The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989/06/21 - Agenda Packet - ''~, CITY - COUNCIL .~ A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~i REGULAR MEETINGS ~ 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. Jwe 21, 1989 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~~• City Councilmemben Dennis L. Stout, .vavo. Pamela ]. Wright, co~~drm.merr Deborah N. Brown, Nuro.vRrem Charles 1. Buquet, co~~oam.me.. William 1. Alexander, cawe.xm.me., w ~ Jack Lam, crry .i/uw~rr ;ariiES L. hEerkman, cny atomey Beverly A. Authelet, cry cr.rt City Office; 989-1851 Lions Park; 980-7145 PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1989 All item. submitted for the Citp Council Agende must be in writing. The demdl ins far submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. oa the wedaesdsy prior to Lbe meeting. The City clerk's Office receives ell Hoch hems. A. CALL TO ORDER I _. _ of - 1 ul°ag^ A__egia.-.ca .o Flag. 2. Ro11 Call: Bu goat _, Alexander _, Stout _, Brown _, and Wright R. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation to Beverly Aut haler, City Clerk, wish inq her good luck in the City of Chula Viet a. 2. Presentation by Cucamonga County Water Dletrict. 0. COMNDNIGTIONS PROM THE PVHLIC This i. the time and plsca for the geverel public to address the City Comcil. Stmt Lw prohiblb the city Council from addressing nap issum vot prmviouslp included oa the Agende. The City Council may receive testimony and net the matter for a suoaequenc maecing. Coueats are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Cslendar item. ere expected to be routine and oov-controvert lsl. They will ba aceed upon by the Council et one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Couacilrember or member of the audience for diacusaiov. 1. Approval of warzante, Register Noe. 6/7/89 and 6/14/89 1 and Payzoll ending 6/8/09 foz the total amount cf $2,143,037.71. i 2. Approval to authorize the advert ie in9 of the "Notice ~~1 Inuit inq Bide" for the Victoria Street Improvements from Eae[ Avenue to Etlwanda High School to be Funded from Systems Development funds -Account No. 22-4637-8853 (FY 88/89 Budget Item) City Council Agenda dune 21, 1989 PAGE AESOLVTION NO. 89-271 12 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VICTORIA STREET IMPR0VEMENT3 FROM EABT AVENUE TO ETI WANOA HIGH SCHOOL", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO I I I ~ ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "NOCice 16 Inviting eida^ for Beryl and Lions Park improvements to be funded from Park Development Fund d20-4532-8006 and the 1988 and 19R9 Park Bond Act Fund :R29-4532-8610 and 8810. (PY BB/89 Budget Item) RESOLUTION NO. 89-272 l9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIPICATIONS FOR THE RENOVATION OF BERYL AND LION3 PARRS TO INCLUDE TENNIS COURTS AND OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE AND RECEIVE BIDS i 4. Approval of Memorandums of Understanding with employee ~4 groups for Fiscal Year 3989/90. 5. Approval of annual loan transaction between Che City of _'4 Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment. Agency. 6. Approval to purchase vehicle 11fts and adapters Erom 3(: Sefac Lift and Eyvipment Corporation of Columbia, Maryland, for the amount of 528,365.18 to be funded from Account Number 25-4285-7043. (PY 98/89 Budget Year) 7. Approval to purchase electronic diagnoet is engine 3E analyzer form Sun Electric Corporation of Santa Ana, California, for the amount of $26,677.95 to be funded from Account Number 01-4647-7044 and I.G.S. (PY 8B/B9 Budget Year) 9. Approval to award the Feron Boulevard Improvement Pzoj act from Ramona Avenue to Nermoea Avenue for the amount of $69,828.60, to be Eunded from CDBG footle - Account No. 28-4333-8194. (PY 88/89 Budget Year) City Council Agentla June 21, 1989 PAGE 9. Approval to award the Traffic Signals and Safety Light ink 4"l Improvement Project at the intersection Baee Line Road and Ramona Avenue (Account No. 12-4637-8826), Baee Line Road and Valencia (Account No. 32-4637-BB27), and Haven Avenue and Victoria Street (Account No. 12 -4fi37-8832) for the amount of 5379,605.00 to be funded with TDA Article 8 Funda. 30. Aonroval to award the 013 Tewn Park ?:rpro.ema.-.: yrvj=Ct l5 to Marc in J> Jaeka, Incorporated, for the amount of $912,252.00 plus 106 contingency to be funded from Park Development Fund No. 20-4532-8611 and community Block Grant Funds Account No. 28-4333-8181. (FY 88/89 Budget Year) 11. Approval to award and execute a Professional Service 97 Agreement (CO 89-092) for design services relating to the 8eaut if icat ion and Arts Study and Nexus to J.F. Davidson Associates, Incorporated for the amount of 537,000.00 to be funded from Beaut ificatior. Funda, Account Number 21- 4647-8871. (FY 88/89 Budget Year) 12. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 09-093) for 4R Parcel 1 of Pareel Map 3298, located on 10010 Almond 5t rest, submitted by W¢n-De Heu and Chang LL-HUa Heu. RESOLUTION NO. 89-273 99 .. ................. we inc ~.a rt wwnl.iL VC' '1'ME l:l'1'Y OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM WEN-OA HSU AND CHANG LI-HUA HSU AND AVTHORIZSNG THE MAYOP, AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN SAME 13. Approval of Cooperative Agreement (CO 89-094) with 51 Department of Transportation, skate of California (CALTAANS) for the improvements of state Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) located between the Deer Creek Channel and Rochester Avenue, eubm fitted by CALTRANS. RESOLUTION NO. 89-274 72 A Rfi50LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ... F',.4NC.... .,.,.. . Ciw iFwRFiA, APPRUVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTAA.NS) FOR IMPROVEMENTS OP STATE ROUTE 66 (POOTHILL BOULEVARD) PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1989 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security 53 and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance ^ietrict No. 3 and street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR Be-26, located on the south aide of Sharon Circle, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Indumar Investments/ Incorporated. RESOLVT ION N0. 89-275 54 A ABSOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO, 88-26 RESOLUTION NO. 09-276 5`' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDfiRING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINT%NANCE DI6TA ICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 3 AND b FOA DR 88- 28 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement .+nd Improvement %s Security for Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of sapphire Street and Hil le ids Road, submitted by Hil leide/Sapphire Venture. .W UVa.V11V1~ INV. 6Y-L// ~j9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY OF TRACT NO. 13728 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 6!. Security for Tract 11734, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway, submitted by Lew Le Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 89-278 67. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PAZ: C:1O CVCAMOi:v'A, Ciu,i e`ORH1A, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NO. 11734 City cour.c it Agenda June 21, 19 E9 PAGE 17. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract ~ 54 13715 located on the nor[heaet corner of Jennet Street and Exeter Court, eubm it ted by Walton Construction Company. I AEEOLUTI ON NO. 09-279 I 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY y OF RANCFIO ^VCAHONGn, Citi.Ir`OHNf A, APPROVING i IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13715 1E. Approval of Lmprovement Agreemen[ Extension for 6809 57 Hellman Avenue located on the east aide of Hellman it Avenue, north of 19th Street, submitted by Laelo Vass. RESOLUTION NO. 09-280 58 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO SMPAOVEMENT SECVRITY POR 6809 HELLMAN AVENUE 19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 7U 13644, located on the eoutheaet corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista Groves Court, submitted by Woodridge Eet at es Limited. RESOLUTION NO. R9-2R1 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13644 20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for OR E7- 7j 26, located on the eoutheaet corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue, eubm it ted by Watson Land Company. RESOLUTION NO. E9-282 74 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA; CALL F4FN IA, APPROVING ~ ~ ~ ~ iMYMOVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA ON 87-2fi _.~~: PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1989 21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bond a, and 76 file Notice of Completion for: DR 85-Ofi. located on the th 'd f A H' h between Haven Aven e a d C t A Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 318,190.00 RESO*_UT_ION NC. 8,-283 ~. A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 8$-06 ANO AVTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE DR 85-31. located on the north t r H A 78 and 4th Street Faithful Performance 9o nd (Street) $ 156,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Storm Drain) $ 107,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-284 7j A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DA 85-31 pND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF .:..,,B..cl w,. own ina wunn Tract 13058 located on [he woof 'd f F t Wav RO south of Hi hl d A e Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 750,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 75,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-285 pi ~~ ••..• ~•a: wuncin ua~ TnE CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAE CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEME NTS FOR TRACT 13058 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORR f': City Council Agenda June 21, 1909 PAGE Tracts 12650 and 12650-4 1 t d th th t 82 of Canistel Ave d D er Canvon Drive Re lea66 (Tract 12650): Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 2:0,000.00 Accept (Tract 12650): Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ ['1,000.00 Release (Tract 12650-4): Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 360,000.00 Accept (Tract 12650-6): Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 36,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-286 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTINU THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA TRACT NOS. 12 b60 AND 12650-4 AND AUTHOAI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMFLETION FOR TH8 WORK ~ 22. Approval to accept Improvements and release Maintenance ~~ ~...~~.~•••.__ -uuu a~'~ liioe •ocacea on vne soutn sld¢ of Daee Line Road between Hellman Avenue and Lion 5t rest. Maintenance Guarantee eontl (Street) $ 16,000.00 ~ 23. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue Widening, from P.5 north of Highland Avenue to south of Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 98-162, ae compl¢te, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notice of Completion^. RESOLUTION NO. 89-287 86 R OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAE CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THE ~..uu~e u~ roHcNTa eGR TI'IE HRCHIGALU flVGNUE ~ WIDENING, FROH NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. E8-152, AND AUTNORI2ING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WORK ai} PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1999 24. Approval to accept the Hillside Road Improvements and A7 Storm Drain, from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 88-09"e, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a ^Not ice of Completion". REEOLUTION NO. 89-288 A3 A RESOLVT iON OF THE CITY COT.?^_'_L CF Tf:E CITk OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPAOVENENTS FOR THE HILLSIDE ROAD AND STORM DRAIN, PRCM MALACHITE AVENUE TO ARCNIHALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 88-092, AND AllTHORTZINC THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE 25. Approval to accept the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain, from A9 ^_he Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing !o Monte Vista Street, Contract No. Be-164, ae complete, release bends and authorize the City Engineet to File a "Notice of Completion". RESOLUTION NO. 89-289 90 A RESOLUT ZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE HELLMAN AVENUE BTORM DRAIN, FAOH THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC ::.IL :~~ ~____ - nvnic nip l'N ~'1'Hf:C 1'r JU V CONTRACT NO. 88 164V AND AIITHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE £• CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinencee bane had public bee riags et the time of first reed ivg. Second readings are expected to be routine and von-cantrovarsial. Thap will be acted upon by the Council at one tine without diacwaion. The City Clezk will reed the title. Any itev can ba tenoned for discussion. No Items Submitted. P. MVEATI SED PUBLIC HF RINGS Tha following iteva hens bean edvartisad and/or posted as public hearings as required by leN. The chair will open the meeting to receive public testlvony. City Ccuncil Agenda June 21, 1909 P.4GH 1. AP O G COHMISSION DECISION TO NY VARIANCE S1. 89-04 AND MINOR DEVELOPMENT RHVIEW 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS - A request to grade and pave approximately 12 scree of land and a request io reduce the parking setback from 25 feet io 8 feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to 8 feet in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south aide of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Vincent Avenues - APN 209- 1 143-CT, C , S 09. 2. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO 111 CVCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PRIVATE STREET DESIGNATION AND E ON FROM S BEET EDICATI N CONSTRUCTION i REQUIREMENTS ORDINANCE NO. 58-C (first reading) 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.055 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN E%EMPTION FOR PRIVATE STREETS FROM STREET DEDICATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEBSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE ANF,NDMENT - il° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 16, THE SVBDIVISZON ORDINANCE, REGARDING APPEAL PERIODS, APPROVAL PERIODS, AND E%TENSIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 28-C (first reading) 122 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN 125 AMEND T B9 02 - CITY OF C C C ON A - An amendment to the land use definition of ^BUildinq Maintenance Services" to include small operation coot rectors which meet certain criteria. ORDINANCE N0. 396 l,firet reading) ~ 74f AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TXE CITY OF PANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALZ FORNIA, AHEND ING THE SNDUSTRI AL 3PECIPIC PLAN TO INCLUDE SMALL OPERATION BUILDING CONTRACTORS WHICH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN TH8 LAND USE DSPINITION OF "BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES" PAGE City Council Agentla June 21, 1489 i0 5. CONSIDEHATION OP RMBND ING TITLH 12 OF THE RANCHO 141 CUCAMONGA HON ICIPAL CODfi ALLOWING EXCLUSION OF THE CONSTRVCTION OF SI OEWALRS ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS ORDINANCE NO. 58-D (fitet reading) 143 AN ORDINANCE OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ~ ~ OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.040(A) TO THE RANCHO CVCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODH PERTAINING TO AN E%EMPTION FROM THS CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS ON CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL STREETS LAS 6. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THfi ANNUAL LEVY OP ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE ' PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT OISTAICT f85PD1 I 145A RESOLUTION NO. 89-291 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN TH& PARR AND RECREATION IMPROVBMBNT DISTRICT 85PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) 146 7. CONSIDBAATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ANO RESOLUTION R N F ASSBSS NTS W N STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. d. 5 it ~ b b FOA FISCAL YfiAA 1989/90 146A PESOLUTION NO. b9-292 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY H G R O COLI.ECT ASSES MEN TS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 3, 2, 3, 4, 5 6 6 FOA FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT' OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 b 6 14) E. CUNSZDEHATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND i ~ _ ION AHHVAL LEVY OF ASSESSME •, •• LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 2. 3A. 38. 4 56 6 FOR PISCAL YEAR 198 90 ~'(~ t~ ' n 4 ~~ PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1989 11 1478 RESOLUTION NO. 89-293 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLHCT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3H, 4, 5 & 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPB AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 IN CONNECTION WITN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4r 5 6 6 148 9. CONSIDERATION TO PORN COMAIINITY PACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TA%. 'i AUTHORIZATION PI E ERT IN C P I IES AND ESTABLISHING POLICY ON ANNEXATION OF ALL FUTVAE DEVELOPMENT INTO THE LAW HNFOACEMENT PORTION OF Th1E i DISTRICT (Cavtinuad frv~ Juva 7, 1989 ~eeting) I RESOLUTION NO. 89-262 1488 i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY t OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING NECHSSITY TO INCUR A BONDBD INDEBTEDNESS, SURMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF A ~ C021MUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THE PROFOSZTIC:7 TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY A SPECIAL TAX LEVY TO PAY FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL FACILITIES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND GIVING NOTICE THEREON, AND EBTAHL ISHINC PROCEDURES AND CONDITIONS FOR CONDVCTING AN ELECTION I RESOLUTION NO. 89-263 148K A RESOLUT ZON OP THE CZTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AND ESTABLISHING THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THF. QUALIFIED ELECTORS RESOLUTION NO. 89-264 148R A RESOLUTION OF THfi CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OP A COMMVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT l~~~=' > .{,,,°, t ~'-~ / PAGE City Council Agenda ~Y' ~e'~3~ June 21, 1989 12 RESOLUTION NO. 89-265 1485 A RSSOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF 1'HE CITY j OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALI FOANIA, MAKING CERTAIN PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND PASSING UPON PROTESTS 30. ORDERING THE FORHAT ION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRZCT 149 NO. J FOR TfiNTATIVE TRACT 13556-1 AND -3 LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET WEST OF CHERRY AVENL RESOLUTION NO. 89-290 150 A RESOLi]TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT O, pDBLIC B6ARIN09 Tha following items have sso legal publication or posting requiremeate. The Chair trill open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. APPEAL OF NOTICE ANO ORDER OF BUILDING OFFI IAL 162 DANGEROUS BUILDING - 9'168_ CENTER - An appeal ha ar Inc before the City Council, acting ae the Board of Appeals, requnated by the owner of property located north of Foothill Boulevard on the east aide of Center Street, requeeti,ng that the Notice and Ortler of the Building Official for Abatement of a Dangerous Building, at that location, ba set aside cr modified. (COatiaued from June I, 1989 meeting - Sinca that date, the bssilding hsa been abated.) R. CITY M1INAGER'9 BTAP} REPORTS The fallowing iteu do sot lagallp require anp public test imoay, although the Chair nap open the meeting for public ~ ~o,~t . ~ __ 1. CONS IDEAATION OF CONCEPT FOA A %ERISCAP O INAN 163 ,.._, f'. PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1989 13 165 2. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING PARR WATCH PROGRAM - PARRS ~ WATCH ie a crime prevention program which enlists [he active participation of citizens in cooperation with law enforcement to reduce crime within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 16] 3. STATUS REPORT ON THE ISSUE OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS IN ~ CJNNNCTION WITH DEVELOPHENT OP DON TAPIR PARE fCREERSIDE PARXI - regardi nc improvement of sidewalks on Valle Vista and Alta Cueata Drives with development of Don Tapia Park. 4. PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC GRAPE VINEYARDS 1]Q i]2 5. PRESERVATION OF THE EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR ALTERNATIVE CIRCULATION CORRIDORS RESOLUTION N0. 89-294 1]2A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PABSBRVATION OF THE EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHT-OP-WAYS FOR ALTERNATIVE CIRCULATION CORRIDORS b. ONSIDE O F IN VDING AN INDEPENDENT STUDY OF LAW SJ9 T OPTIONS IN FY 1989 90 B DGET I. COUNCIL BUSINHSS The following items heve been requested by the City Council for diacuesion. They ere not public hearing items, although the Chair map open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OP APPOINTMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION (Oral Report) I 2. CONSIDERATION OP APPOINTMENT 0 L T UN RED TERM ~, OF CITY CLERK (Oral Aepoit) i i ]_ __erhee.OH 0 _L COHSE..°.VAT.ION .°.ND TY.E PLANNING PP.OCESS (Oral Report by Chuck Buquet) ~,i,>'y''~`, 5;t ~ } i~ '! PAGE City Council Agenda June 21, 1989 14 J. IDRNTIFIGTION OP ITEMS POR NBZT N66TIN0 Thin is LDe tive for Ciiy Covncil to idevtify the iteae they wisp to diacuaa mt the next veetivg. These iteas will not De diseusaed at thin veeiiag, only identified for the next vesting. [. COIMUNIGTIONS PROM TH6 PUBLIC TIlie is the tine mad place for the gsveral public to adtlress the City Council. Stake law prohibits the City Council from addreaaivg any iuua not previously included ov tIle Agevda. The Citp Council vmy receive Lestivonp avd set the matter for a subsequent veeiing. Comments are to be liviied to five vivute6 per individual. L. ADJOVRMUDiT NSETINO TO AWOURN TO E26CUTIV6 6688ION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTSR6 I, Bevezly A. Aut he let, Ciiy Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing age..-.da van posted o:. June 1L, 1989, seventy-two (.2) hcure prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 9320- C Baae Line Aoad. r, tr~~ c i s 9 mp~i-aprynnrf~aOa+nP~ONmOnOOmOp On O.OP a i- i .... ..~ .. .. Wa$.oame ao..n.~.me~..m e.....+.Na~oPO-. n.~.ae ~'r<W W^ ? z~J c zW z ~ a~ e9i o~ zJ w W - Y:~ W~.W .> __ j~` ~~ ei m.`, -"'~C'i: x+1'3'" z .`ib+iY~~'a~soi3 `: a3.m5 `niiu`u'i . m ^.ny ova _..~yg _ y~W~ se.m..a au W..~... ~ ., oN,.:o=a,>+e,.N;_n....~eNm_,._~~e~.~N; _- g ;c~ .. a _> V iu!i~ ~ V N ~ u. ~OU.•n0 y y { s dYON~ ~F~7 iMN^ O N~y 'O ti<.-n+ .°.~ y o mS31F m. m^i`e'e ~'W' 7! " ~oi~a.°."~N• `~N ,. ma.$M.N ma.._~ °oi-`iA9SvQo $~~~: :. o$eNiCn sms u~ W ope~c mW°. ' siN~... e i ue u^6 O_~W.n p FyN ~( WN i .~ m. 0 0 .i..7~iii'~.a.~.:r~imm~-mm$.u.iu M.'~`, "J r oma ~-.aNa.Nn.. mi-N nN a-.n~-m.r N..mn r ~ ~°.:$X.^s'ra°'m^ry °nia~°.'"e~o~S,~«ynneo~°nMiemm Yooo.oumad.o°oooro .. °+°n~°oe^°eom dof-...dod oono,. S.$io.°. °n `e °e vo °e ooeo i . ., ~~h^....T n^mmmmmm mmn,~~nnn^n m.~..^m^~...h..^m..m nm .. ..n _...n ..... .. _.... _: sz lssd° asz xs i YV~+ VYY2V YV JuW oV U~V _ W Yn ~nV Y i~ w r~ ! n 6 ~:i SiL JVn O~ UZ M1WQ uW G < 'y^ <¢S~Z it°~o if ~hi V J~ ~~f^ n unn YF ~V Q~~i YYd N!~ wr n a°w~o22i3 ~ruin~oY>uOY.'i%° uVSnuMCYCS~v~n Yd4uYV~n nUiw~nn2uVwS<¢+~nVwi 2 ~^ ~ ^ u Q ~ Quv ,J y ° S w° N ° E~°o' WWW 4=~ S~ i o o ~'~" i ^e.3~^... < we3f~4 „' oi's i~ ww 3939oe°+ ° a :3C: s.~ ~3:: au~i 3'<'u~7~~G'o wW <~z1 Y. Y..~ 1°. iuiie~i w.. Vnj n °~nw Y. MYr~Or V`VU=VVVVVnVUVY33„°33,w°°°°°~dwnwwwwwmw.w h fPnm:hin nddeOhlnP<„n^mmPmlOdnaml.~nf NPm! p p OhOfNOpp ~N^InhNN< d ' M1On P°S NNNn< mPPNnm~d<^id NOmdryP rydryhNnn .. x~ ., .c~~g°d~o~omasa a a =, m _ .. .r .d r ry Ws'~~° - x ~ ,,.,,,,_„rmmr.,r~~,nmmm~mr,...,r,,.,,,.,.,rmr.,r.,.,m~,..m ... ~ r Sa e: .... r r ., r t of ryi ~~n~~ on J~O pup U~a J} i ~'Ci wO e.,. .f= -:> :b.: i w V Ji c w'f VZV Y Pa ZUYT~VI~ ~J6mnaj~d u a~ ui~. Y`r'.~i: aiO ~S: ~' ~,r 3'"' ~'S ..sae^.s?T'°. s'+=,.:Pn..m:o: Ya Vi ~i Oi aR~ V P S w Yti~N U L~ i Y CryM 4 r OM~~ ~i aC~uY 6ZYt~ N ~~{{ L< j N6rr 2i>u~i e SaU'00 ~f~6iri C~C ~ ~CZP~6 fP~2rPUrP 'raWaP6iU' PW~~~YS2VanQ UUPi~>C ! un1~3~M>~u ~V~ a raa"° .. 4=W.a~dWa.W«S;yaP .: r~~:~tr e~e~~WVW .ase,~ ~o ~ ~.°° r..eaa.~a~P.~. ~..~ you -+o.+u r~rzFrs nz ry.,r~RRPSOr~.~..ai7ow ran nPOP PV OneONl~In~IryPnlnOr'nir~rrPrf PlVPrynpry r r RRrRP~ryP~a~Rerf s~ rr .... ~.. or~~,ry.P rR ao°0 ~+=.~'.:°.°o°° o°o~e:.".oo°oo°R.°s a'oryo~d .~.aoeon: f ° ..,ry n, •=nn~m~^°m °o ovo'o'^.°^~N °.n'. a`.. +. a..uao-F~++n a~-°P m `d o°~°u 3 m~m„~m.,.,., .,,~«m.,~m~~m .,..rv,,.,...m n.,,~m.,m.,-...,-mm- ~ ~ a sc z .s io°: ° 05 -oo -a $ c _ soyeW oS 'M1a s:Y~ ~ 4° :.. RY+~ ia.~.rv s s ~ .. .. -i.'.i uMF-" zRw~~- ~' iuror~a.~n.~ d~6~ ~ u iN eri::" -~Wee'~3~Y~~~WC~r`.s ~W.°=,g ~.'. r.°.u ~.W'. srdr,~,W iztizso~e~. Wi'+.~.oM Oi. W W~x..~,.~zn~zy~., .. a:. iN 6 xo .. u a° z " ' '"f" Y .z :u iN~~ :i V~ M '~ +Fi~ -~~ i i e a sw--~,ao9i ->.. era R&~=Sa':~Vd ~a ~3m~W~3>a°>4~3s Q4Y° '.~5~.~'.J.°aaeW~Wi.°.~..~a~o~°n.,~i..W< z.. .: a : .~cd .s .. ~.o.. WWW'i3>a..a.. .a.~e Ef..a„ :Y°o"CO: Y. Cfl.,....d~`. ^gria~u~a u`.7.W 3~a 37:x":.':: _~ .a..WW.,.3 ~~. c s 2i~ieoiiiao&o •°s a........ noo n°nn-n s.enn -or ~-rv.°rva,na an~~n.~n R ~nnnno.S.. n, nSw~n ° gr :,RR.°°.A'^ ~°~°.~R RnRk~.oSry~:8,°a.5~~"- °°n n n i i .'. °OO x'.88'=o °o'nn ~~:oo:.: ~""<'a .°.8.`.91`-o'o e':8o8'o ~soo:~~`-o mama.. r..m^»mrvrH.oaN:$mrr a m m o$i fc Se'o "a°,r ofo.nm.ea o0 ';ASS&8 S`d,°. a'o a.^af Se.e>eP CP n n 4( Y ^P^ Wj ^ i3 fa t rt-~'oY Y o u~iu GuY ~ O Ie o m.°.u su uia Ps.'r FNYW N~~~'eWee iNr s'~""~ es r ss~~ YI=~)~ ii~Q=i `a urWiY~V.~ i4 N vein eee0 air iDUi ueia 4'j~w6o u1WUl1 )yin )y ¢S~nN miO2gi~uniy en~~ ufi >'3 i.9~.eS°:_u' °$`~zi~~~•N64°i~. eiS i`iiieio~~ m i~W.s1.IW`B~W.~..".m °~`.^ e:: ez `iii+%:iz ~~a ~Ig~ey, ~~u_eii ~wisy~uy°iynzgy~ <u~m. r4e.+mu:: iNS<SW~NYr.ioe<ii~MiLe7N.Sa i1111.i ~~aN~eis....aIII..e sea •111>c.. N.•I~a.s>~am~<e<+ a s111~1...s.+N'~'i uNaR<~o N,. __ s YY _ ~ a asa ~WJOIW.1 6 VY WN> N i N N :oo=a=aoa~- c~~-~a va~r is yi~u.1 Ri ~ao~Jna~°~~fSe:..:Y~VY1ja~fY~WJ 6~ps~ei6eQr>¢QiLNU:s`s ~i ~~~m~~~~~~~m~mm a ;~Ys :~~ ~~W ~ s~ W 9J C 2 Tu V 70 J O ~ j{n Y Z_Yrn JWJ OV ~GJf i ¢SWi~ I~u~tii i R~3SS ~` :s 3. Wiz+z.y i3m:2~.6".4W 's'~iia:Sa od oex ..se`s+wz:u+w~. i z 4 ~n~ i C ZZ rV~w ~' 8gi~u SJ~= ~W ~~:~~~ ~'a~~a:W > .W~> e~ °=~:ca CeFJWy~ .~ F FOF J.~` V ..e~°aiSii'Y iiRxr~ e e.`.o~oi :go `noaSmS ice. m 0000 rNO mrNNryOP0FOrydONNP0O1~aNN^P0000 0 0000 oo tio.:lr.~.r-womo-~om1.i +"w i-r=ou, l-~o orymraNo 1 ~dOa m m d.yd Nr~P0APN.m.1NV=NOO<~« « « O f « dm ^ ry O d d Y u o_ V i x z a P m r Y I p a N<w,o ~"-m~rY al-~i~.-n.NmrNal- Wpo-.rvmra ar-mP O..~mrNa aPPPPPPPpPPpPPPPPPPPPPPpOPPOPP PPPPPPPppP mmmf~lmmnmm m,': ~mmn mmnmmnmo.m n,"nmmmmn nlmn .m<fe.nnn.~".~ 1 «1N t- a o c~ u11 c u`I F F <F rm' ~ L W L m °z o~1m1« .. ci «~« .. a« .. ..««Y.m u < u°m wW ¢ W ~W its ¢¢¢ a ,`. ~N x x ~i iz o~~ orhz~ -. zzz it W. x rvFt WOLL iwoo mo joioY in oo~NOg ~ V 1N Ww¢W~Q OaVW UMVN VZ NJ«Ja VWW2W< W WP 60L =ieT VNO\W;L wZT s«~ UQ ASV¢ Vw Qr M¢'J ¢LL~<N¢WCURNil2< > LLO« 6 1u ¢ OWWCNC 7Y¢<Wi N O YFN =m \2«'= QQVU LPYU U4{N 0mtW 1t W_Vlf Z _ 62«~ miN~Z UWVU~ 6 nn`o < Vn« \e« m<JV O! <1 N O QI y O ON UINY6~1Nw ^ O{OwWKtOLLV«N6^~O.«Y <Vw W « YV«7< 6w6f20wJY ~J 2 9LW0^2 V 72i N~dOWW«W1wy0 < m2J2m OOH Z9 mZ6~ OVLZOm«LLKZry«JZ Ou0 VV111 00~ <Y 2 {LL021¢OQY{WOMZZ IIG LF0CF 0W0 Ni 1V< ~ O<Wi OYZOU mV~«V=i¢u ¢t O14 V Y2wJ uti Y ¢ V40<LL6T6 mYp00_ N_Z w l-F« « 1-"Jilnm nl Y U wILJ 121««np«YJ Ji-1'1 w « 6wQiJ«;iO ¢ `UF ¢OV4N Wr/Z < VNNUJT «KyNON1< hVi« u o s^¢mmao~ 3 ooLLe<V a. ur-«iLNgJ <hN SLSw60KU¢S2Z6Lt¢6 JF%mpm wiuN UyV VmYJ 0 oz{z eoW>WOwwN^zWwWr<LLOio~W»z.1uu~«~ > >uo« iu>oomLLmJa<>woNyNwLLmNWNOLLl «yJNme V ti LaF Q V O «6N < • N « ~« O < 3 O aSi ¢Kw yW« LL S y U rii O US N N <~< yOWm OV «2¢NmUL < UO OZ`i'1«IW-w.ii4 M1 2i2 Zi0<L 014 N< iVU~VOp6nY tN «7W0¢J22J ~~ N OLLO F mJWWVNW2OF~~jj pOO 11yy « y py Wa 1 WF LtM¢JFW tY6WWJ V 'JI=jNOOK NMWO < 09 iah6pZLL jjii OVVLLFI[KN < WV<UV Lw1 ZLLFOLOOON 6mWpU 1.~<y Q ` O O h U V nL 21Wy<OWLLOhhNOWOOW O_Fa li+yTl1W <WUfLLT> N ~ J /LL JYV{<I~IV ItNWw ¢mWVLL {LL<~O~N~<O N yWe WzioauW JJ p J OLmi <r~m~uS~GNN~V O~8<TNim'OLM<QaY « NJO Y m¢~~ «ffYf ~~<t «mm~WmimCmVV VYVYVUYOhI S MONO n10 mOpNrw<dryryFdNYx10PNmPn dPl NNh^NN^ rFPF PT1p(~O ^m qO fNN TON^NrNdmNdrl~lr mmO<PyY ~ .ri r1 n1NMmNNP 1~ry^ ^ NnMNN IOVPd P 7 •+OOd'aJPOONOaOdOOdOO N.n OONO mv.O!•~O ••w0000Ntir qP rll0ma000NwadNOOV'OON •tOOFOmPOWlv~O Pnm pO OpNlOF~+ N <! nOd+tlNrPJFOlNWIwIT ~NNIPVNhnwlNrdwadrti^OOPdFPW m m !+t N rPwT ~mry Ndm<PNa'.rON •~ < N !d O ~+ N nmNN 6 < ~ N nl 31 < 2 <1 rmPO-~NTYN~OhgPUnNTYN dhmPO•~rvmlN.pr WPO•~NmM,n dr ` LI PPPPP~PPPPPPPPPPPPPmPPPCYY'O]00000~00000^mU0 tJ 31 mmmmmmmmmmmmm m~lm TmmmTmmmmmmmmmTmmm Tmmmmmm U L Z L LL YLi p u} U Z 2 N < rt wLwN ^ ^ ^n ti •~ •t < o^ s ¢ z¢ ¢_ i v¢W¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢¢ uw u WPW s <2 L z .aiw i.^. Ymi iz x xzx 6F Y FPF` O O J O ¢ONOU U^O 00 .1 700 (IINPO F ll w6W y' Yw WLL N9LLWOU.u WYW WU W 'JWW Z 1 U _ p_ O V <_ 2 SOJ J ! >JS \LLOVJZ L 7F1• <^ W¢< OJ4<WSFVY00 J6N .S. •~il FU JVp OjJ y^I6U w> <66 uyW JRI<- 0{LL¢ FV~OU<9uuLL u0<W ~SWN <USpWYYJ >u4 ¢1 WwWV Uai Fvy4 J{JN60<¢ ZW }•n¢YU¢N M hl oSr<iiw ¢Uy W^NOtn LpSJON22Wln¢WWNLSYYaJ 1JJF L^WWU Ow L<YVWw V6U F¢FOU 61.. Lr t L6l J ~ ¢ i u¢Z W~.V~y •~ N N «WZ ZwY 2U ^O NYI p<M1N LpP UJ~Op<FSNtiL2Wi<Y24p0 p~N wWZ ¢n_wN¢w Y7{OM1wZZ ••¢mUV6P¢<1<96'O VpZ¢OWF~ON~nJUZ?p¢J1-FY A GWJ Z~f r-il-rY JYLn SW F ZwG JON ZO<O VwF4-P¢>000 LJLMJL ZfJM1InifLLY N^^W¢ LLnLQni2ZWN{¢p¢<WWm 1 ¢O^L«ww¢^2WwJw•~~2L<W02wi00<W«LL<JOP••LL¢KO IUVwLUNNr\w¢}LOF Ur•p 6pVF¢NV<L¢ZJNp62nLFUUJ Z YV V V> Z Z 1 SON F r• { <¢ O uU s Fu ul¢} z: L ¢ J U ¢ Z6 2 U ^Y O O^ p V• Ni~° i o `o^ z ¢ o Z~7 {S ¢ T OV Uti_ Ou VS S Jr 2 C%•<'~ < ~ Olmr- 40 > r•y~iiJ Vm0 ^2 ^ lw V 9'Oh Yf ~ ¢¢Ww O r>n N M1 OC Z26 •J YO WWN ¢ „O <w <u ~• iZV~[6 Nwt YJF NOJN RI < j pY~a ~ z up^o^ ~iuN ~.JU<i<e~<u~ Z L 2irFyoW Y¢ iZa F Yi<Z O F^NNZY¢J10 aF _h V~•iO MJSp^Q iF iU< 1 • O~^t WL6 <p^~• O O NY16~ O 1 a0i NZ`< 0¢JJN W < t ZOW¢2~ZL^<L 1 W N66 LO<OW •JV• <iM1IY ONLiF`<O¢LFUJ MWO iLi~wJ ~j <LWN< Y V < ! i i N 1 W6 ` LLN 1 jpi WSM WyU<NJO •+ 1 F 01"IWWYCOF SLWOiO 6¢ pWM OJL F_ i`_'J 16Wy YY• JNJOp< i Wa`3WW%MVp L ~ Yi•ILFMW'2 iNW¢JW YWWUM}OVUIG__r,~p Jj`jJ 8~j~¢ P 1 <iJ W^^^60p'F aWOY iYL Oj y1 tp «uUu a W I ON~OUpp~ WLL9LLJVU JfLi iln l..lMp1^MLLZ piiViiCii YI ! 61 FONF PPPiTlNFNOlIt10F<NaTTO.h PF<TI{1M P<N •JINTN~p •t I 1 'OOhTh..ppN»:yO NfaNPIl1 PY1111l Opy2 TNwPPNfNFFlFNNryM d ; TN^ti d0lpa N^lFMY~^<^NNN~IOVN~^^T O.ny ry F~FF oWroooaam°naoooooo°.aor~-oPOOOgrvm,omOOao'•.-mo ogroaogmro Prggopororon+°N+orWaomaNOOni-+No .......... ...... . ......... .. ... .. . +~mmPaa+drYmPOP h.gilO N°yOplrNlPrOl.lnm°°hmPOm .a + r O r YO mr r r r a -. rv r a u Z R L 6 < s u O P O W } ~ < c a Wp0•'aNi•. Y.t. a1-mPOrnl.lr NahmpOrN m.'qd Wp°rrym+'n al••D N ml•1N Y++Yr++rf+NNngNmNNN 0±0 OOOOAO t000o0000O000000 O JO 0000000 Y +$+!!Y!!g +++lr+rrrlrr+rlg+grlg r+lr++Y nNnnnmNn~..m nlem mqN n.•Irv mrynNN~•.mmm,.INmmmT m..IN NN~•.m M N GY i V L L1 .. N .. L r .'. 1 ~. .a SO i<¢![ NY KP VRm w h< m ¢6< uw zh zwzs ¢ui zr cio i zr x ~ xxx O~ X00 9... WOL 60ZNSP 10 O ~P O~ON Ph Wr WEWW Nf RW-.O ~.Whm20 ~ .Z.W W mP WWWf L YN m<n S Q pw~ >¢a~ N<o idJr i o YUwrO WON6NNUJ 60611 S O h .>< <WNYW °L¢ury1Ll < O W <6< 201 ."r<MJ ` 1U V 2ZUi U NV Rm LL hV~ugilV rLiV~J LLI OI~•J > uG[ ..<J i .1iJ 00 J<O<f Z6V<N<~Y~ O N G OM1 Jw<_yj UV<ti2 MwihYOTjW<rLJ M1M~ ¢ wi ¢L i2< Nm i WO}6> .N'.6 whOPHN~NwU<LLsW<r ~ ~<F 1J<WN SN y ¢<h yFJ^` UaLLYYN 01~~-.NwjO JJ2r3J WY[Z 6 RO<4r >u°. 060t]RUi Z~'N ~tJ 6JMwiGW >F. iy~iNGLV30WhOOV mtNUU6NY<6uNU6Um luOmLOa'NLL<WiF>aC>W h~10 aYY¢ P V m i uc .z o ru ¢~ zu 'a;NO o> tY W U >W ~ uu }~ sWS :o zz s O < Ww 6i Np }~ 6 2Y ¢ 1J NVa O u O i-.i 6 V ~JN OZ6 V L RW ~ zWa }J~ }u¢asii z °z ii> N u uaM1Ja W O NO „~ V¢ O .rl.yy SW.+<iW N>i 0J[H~H¢C <1~ r V rh ~,~ji JGL rS¢JWi~ NrZW<.w uWH OONNFUjJ « JONWWJ f2 6.1 ~ i gawONO N i X 00 Jan¢°iii mN~ .~ i~u uzi<~ NaZ J`Yp g ¢°i rW-Rd~ . 2~u .¢im W J OZ~Za 1.• 6. OFYNJ nI~I~NW yW'G OLL pOp `LL` R.'. .'.U«<Ow0`` JJM1¢ OM V.•I FW a<NN OJ< w< OKaS~Ji~i60yN X``iF V~irNJp}<UV006¢OQ~1 '^V~NWWi ~V~~690~ «YUia 1 1y VYWY<i ylWiii!'JJ OJ}»V 00002 `<O W~I~'(2i «a.".Jpa6~a «~<WWMMy hizssc:suz z: sa GM1Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaa asassaN OPryO T1.IN NTaNOayyry}YNagq yhq qOq ayaf ahdNdMddN NIII.f.a}Pr+IN NPIO 1~1d O1JOR+d+••IOgNl~d aq.IM+ Nip y~ M1M1 ^!ryl~MddMHgTMNON TN'f wO T^NOO wN^h.O d00•'aNN ry y N Nry Nry N 9 NOO~O'ImOamNNnONOmO0am1'~OaOrPON a M1 m.~in .~N NPmymY N.nm aPP ~NNOh r n r rmi .wiNna .nN wM1pMYymrmM1Nm i s 0 c ~ i V a F O Y y H < J p u o..rv m+NaM1mPD.+nmrNOhaPO~.rymrN aaaaaaaaaoh~-M1«M1n h~-~-h mmmmmm oiof~oi o~~oY~ YooooooooooDY ~r r $ r++rr++r+rr+ mmmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmm L f Oi t LL V NI « 2 .y«.n Y% .-~ r.i« V ¢« < ~ <K6¢66 j .y ¢¢ Sw_w_W__wW _ Ou wwn < 12- m r « h oN«a oeo Dm~ ,onN wiD oo °. ° j WWWWWry ZO WU «JW W N Ly¢0000 Z«W < Jiu ¢ V 6„Y. ryN~VO fZO0Y~1 p s uIJ¢aoonm ~i~i n .°.IwoN¢¢ "' '"' "' • ~Ni .'. ula uD'aauiN aD.Wi `N V7¢IYnP~ m¢WiPO¢POm 00 2J JYOm<ODh 1 D iS00 2'Jp poW«pUmhNOODU W^?ti t¢mNOyO Ww> LNO¢mOpPOOR SST Om SG 26N ZYL ,Orl-!r 00 KCU YM«6 Uwl«1-u.[1m 00~«u SWww ~ < {~J ~¢6 I Z Z OIZ¢0Z Wi p¢r~`fn +mmmp¢s iya~o<o«Nn WIN-.~: oy. Z w22w«I 11 YOSNUhnNm.-~N6<60 VJlupWp'MNaa00¢I1Yw6~ONWLpJOL > h •SN 2 p U tO.I000LO U V J S i Or .Si ¢ w OONU4 V0 < O Ny O S UOpO< V 2 1 y ti wWwWV2 ~jY ¢ i Gu t«it<n 0[¢ ~ UO W U ~¢ E C~¢¢~V h <O HmO.<+w0 ~ Vw u0000n NO VF «VF J.". ¢ ~WSOOZULLWUU¢ p ` wli O«<W 6N¢Jw.4 M«MM6 SO ea 6Ryyip6 RN N1.JYWmWI<JIY YUU„Nfrl-yam •F:L1LUi 6 _'Z <uN2M¢ 6N 61yi¢yV ~~i aM VUYi¢ Mt O J Ot« ~¢li<O yjiNU JJ<_O_¢YNO teW20 Wi IC¢ U J%<L Ow¢ytZ22Iw~~NNwW ~ O 6 JOjO 9N2<`6 IN JW¢yJ1S¢MW LNNC~Y.On NNNNN II"FJ7Jy 7MYJjlt JN MOmOPThhhhPhNP«O T.+1.f`OO POn 000Tf.pn w«M Nf w~Zf wlim y.p PNSOTF yTIPN ryPTTTTTryyNTrryO.pOryrhNNNT /~ - C[TY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONrA STAFF REPORT ~., ~- .~-:~ DATE: June 21, 1489 T0: City Council and City Manager ', FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i, 8Y: Linda Beek, Junior Civil Engineer '~, SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the VTc toria Street Improvements, from East Avenue to '~. Etiwanda High School, to be funded from Systems Development ''~, Funds Account No. 22-4637-8853 It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Victoria Street Improvements, from East Avenue to Etiwanda High School, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BAC :GROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Linville Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is Si,iu,dw.uG. Loyal auver ii Sing is acire duffed iur ~i wre u , and July 5, 1989, with the bid opening at July 10, 1989, 10:00 a.m. Respec tfully-submitted, > ~/ ~ G~ ( ~~^. ~~~/ ~ RHM: LB T~ Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~ I ~ ~ ~ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM EAST AVENUE TO ETIWANDA NIGH SCHOOL," IN SAID CITY ANO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TC AOVERTI SE TO RECEIVE BIOS. WHEREAS it the rtes±ton Of the C'ty of Rancho Cuc..^..ong3 to __.^.s tract certain improvements in•the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 'WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements, NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Victoria Street Improvements, from East Avenue co Etiwanda High School". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required Sy law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Sa~~ Cep ~ ~t„ - ..y - - "Y GIVEN tha Lathe said City of LRa nc ho Cucamonga will receive ~atTthe OffT ce~of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on ar before the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Lhe 10th day of July 1989, sealed bids or proposals for the "Victoria Street Improvements, from East Avenue to Etiwanda High School", in said City. 31ds will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line 0.oad, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must he made on a farm provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Victoria Street Improvements, from East Avenue to Etiwanda HTgh School". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the s ~~.;:s,. ~:. L,b,. C^d^ ni.,1..i~ 2 o~..t ? Chi t^~ I A.t1,.to t pr u .., p , and•2,~the Contractor is required to pay not^less than Lhe general preva111ng rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less that. the general preva111ng rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general preva111ng rates of per diem wages. Copies of such preva111ng rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, 1- ,v Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy o` such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1771.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 911, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the re guiati ons of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: x. wnen unempioymenc in the area of coverage by the joint appren cicesiiip committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or o. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. iiie CJ~i tr`dL Lur ii required L4 make i:Jntri bu Lions Lu funds ei Labi is Bed fUr the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1717.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. /~ _p_ Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the AAninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. 'tight (B) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Cade of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is requT red or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (108) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder wilt enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest biA, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder, The amount of the bond to 6e given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1008) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (508) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries comoensatfon Insurance covering his employees uoon work io be done under contraci which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's license Law (California Busfness and Professions Code, Section 1000 et. seq.) and rules l~/- and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. Tye work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furni=hed upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 535,00, .;. id E35. 00 is nonrefundable. Opon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mai',ed when said request fs accompanieA by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nr:nrei mbursable payment of 520.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. to accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any and all Sids. 9y order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of , 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cai ifornia, this day of , 19 ayar ATTEST: - y er ADVERTISE ON June 27, 1989 July 5, 1989 1-s -4- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: To: FroII: By: June 21, 1989 9 j Q, '~ >.I'' ~ ~ A r z °n 19` Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager Joe Schulte, Community Services Manager Dave Leonard, Park Project Manager Subject: Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bida" for the 8ary1 and Lions Pazk tennis court improvements to be funded from Park Development no. 20-4532-8006 and the 1986 and 1988 State Park Bonds Acts no. 29-4532-8619 and 8810. RECO1B~HtiDATION• City Council approve plans and specifications for the renovation of Beryl and Lions Parks to include tennis courts and related improvements and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting niun~. BACRGRODNQ Per the 1988-89 budget, plans and specifications were developed for the addition of lighted tennis courts and related amenities to the existing Beryl and Lions Park Facilities (see exhibits). Recreation Systems Inc has completed development of the plans and specification and authorization is requested to solicits bids to complete the works. nr.aw . T 1 ~.$ `: 3'£ 3C%1 ~f°03003A003'3000003330 _ ~i\a ~ ~ ,S - Sv ~J J • ~ ~ Imo.` _I ~-~~' ._._ 6. ~ ~ t. IHe3:y~-U ti - L i q ~ 'S ~' i `~ILI T' ws !° ~! i ~ t .~~--+h -i't-~..--__f I 3 ul • H o ff; ~ ;~ ...~ v ! - __ ___ ~. .. ...______. ._ .1 i _ ~ ~_.~._ ~, _ ~ ° _ ~ e .. -- --- -- -- _ __._ ___ 5 I ~• ~. _ -`f ~ ~ •, ~ ~ ° beryl street ~?;. 3~ ti ;nil i-/~ ': i~ ~ ! -,~,:~ ~~ I.r°N w e.melwnn q.n a ._ _ __ _ reaeetlon eyetema Inca7aMW °1 ewrl oN rMeb wuncnp~ .J- .--• .- ~ ~~ _ •~ EXHIBIT A ~~~~ y _ 5 S 3• .~ a.A •,3+ c;~ Ilan K S ~/ i/ice ~ [ ii _ '_ ~ _ - r C '~'_ y,/ i ~~ ~ %- - _ a( ~ i v .: ~~. ~. ,, _ - - ~% ~ I b ~ ~+ 3~~ "/ _ .. `A~ C-. ~ ___ a '~ P~ F ~ ~ N[iq~/~ "'"- I i S - I I iC -~ ?s ~ .i... .i:3iE f i9 .3 'F-i' ~t t,R ~y~ ~-~ti:~ . ~ ~. i 's; _, 3 .. ~ - - - - ' `i; ~?+:711' 'll '•1 I. ~ ~. 431 n I.ro.t .~a ewmxnan p.n _ __. '__.. rxr+at{on rystema in^caPyaated I ''L7+{ _ ~ Ilm. P.rM nMb cYC.mp:W _ EXHIBIT B ~7~- RHSOLOTION NO. 89~88[- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE RENOVATION OF BERYL AND LZON3 PARKS TO INCLUDE TENNIS COURTS AND OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE AND RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for BERYL AND LIONS IMPROVEMENTS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bide or proposals for doing the work specified 1u uiC aitltnoniu t,i sun nO4 G1Jtll:liiCall Ufla, Wf11 Ulf Baid advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: ^NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS^ Pursuant to a resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, July 19, 1989, sealed bids or proposals for BERYL AND LIONS PARK IMPP,OVEMENTS. e cpere.. pu.......r uuuedrn..cay in office of fthe City Clerk, 9320 Base LinenROad, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided Por the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Rid for Construction of BERYL AND LIONS PARK IMPROVEMENTS". 1 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not leas than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is requires to and has determined such general prevailing rates oP par diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Sase Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. Tha Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid lees than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefora stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations oP the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention ie directed to the provisions of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5 as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any appranticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeships committee nearest the site of the public project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices tc je~_rneymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five ... . When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ration of one to five, or O C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements Section 1777.6 fir. the employment of apprentices, Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employefl in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and by subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State if California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter l a~+irlo 1 ,.f fho Ta h...~ (`.+.ie nP hl,o ergo of !`al: an~n:n we amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is regv fired or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work req~~ired by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance ..ith Labc. ..odc ,,.,ct i.... ..,~.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (lo&) of the amount oP said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers check, certified check or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100$) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50$) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims Por any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions oP the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000, et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work is to be dons in accordance with the profiles, plans. and snecifi rata one nt hho ri t., ns vane.,, n...~.".,....> ._... vt i.. in the Office of the City Clerk at~9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Payment of 30.00, said .00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 15.00 to cover the coat of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cu~a-u,vny-a. In orda.^.^_e wit.*. t..*.e requirements Section. 9C< aP the General Provisions, as set Forth in the Plane and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole coat and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monisa withheld (performance retention). cJ v The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali P.ornia, reserves the right to reject any and all bide. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this list day of June, 1989. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, this 21st day of June, 1989. Mayor ATTEST: clerk ADVERTISE ON June 30. 1989 July 12. 1989 ~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ' ~`ie Date: June 21, 1989 To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager From: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director Subject: APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUMS DF UNDERSTANDIM6 M1TH EMPLOYEE 6ROUP5 FOR FISCAL Y 89-90 RECUMENDATION- The City Council adopt the attached Memorandums of Understanding with the employee groups and direct staff to prepare the necessary documents far implementation for fiscal year 89-90. BACK6ROUND- The meet and confer process with employee groups has concluded with agreement having been reached with each group. the attached Memorandums of Understanding reflect the agreements made with each of the employee groups and they have been signed by the representatives of each employee group. The agreements reflected in the Memorandums of Understanding are within Lhe authority given to staff and funds for the packages have been included in the fiscal year 89-90 6u dget. Re spec tfutly submitted, Ji Administrative Services Director JH/rs attachments MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Whereas, the representatives of the Supervisory/Professional Employees Group and representatives of the City have met and conferred regarding wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment, and; Whereas, the representatives of the Supervisory/Professional Employees Group and representatives of the City have reached agreement on items within the scope of Meet and Confer, and; Whereas, the representatives of the Supervisory/Professional Employees Group and representatives of Lhe City wish to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the agreements of the Meet and Confer process; Now, therefore, the Supervisory/Professional Employees Group and the City cf Rancho Cucamonga agree as follows: IMPLEMENTATION All terms and conditions of employment currently in effect and not changed by the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding will remain in effect. Unless otherwise stated, the effective date for implementation of the items in this Memorandum of Understanding is July 3, 1989. The term of this agreement is July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990. SALARY ADJUSTMENT .+ wac as iaiy inu~eaee ur ok. MEDICAL. DENTAL AND OPTICAL COVERAGE The City agrees to average the cost of medical, den tat and optical benefits for fiscal year• 1989/90 including the Principal plan, Kaiser A and Care ,'4nerica, thus, providing for no additional payment by employees for coverage through June 30, 1990. SICK LEAVE BUYBACK The City agrees to increase the number of accrued Sick leave hours it will buy back from employees to 120 hours. The currant ro gg;rnme nt=_ far eligi Wilily ~~~~~„~ ~~~ e sec t. SAFETY FOOTNEAR The City agrees to provide E135 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear for employees required to wear safety footwear as a part of their job responsibilities. The City will establish accounts at Knapp Boots and Red Wing Boots for the purchase of the safety footwear. ~J Memorandum of Understanding Page 2 LIFE INSURANCE The Li ty agrees to increase the base coverage for employees by b10 ,000 to a total of ;30,000. ,411 other differentials established by previous resolutions remain in effect. Additionally, employees who wish to purchase additional life insurance coverage through the City's offered program may do so in 810,000 inc reme~ts a*_ the group rate. The method of payment wiil be through payroll deduction. OBSERVANCE OF MARTIN LUTHER KING BIRTHDAY The City recognized the importance of the observance of Martin Luther King's Birthday to employees. The City also recognizes Lhe importance of ensuring the private sector is able to conduct business. Therefore, the City grants Martin Luther King's Birthday as a holiday in the following manner: City facilities will not be closed on Martin Luther King's Birthday until such Lime as the private sector recognizes Martin Luther King's Bt rthday as a holiday or Lhe federal or state governments mandate that government facilities be closed on that day. Employees who wish to celebrate Martin Luther King's Birthday may do so on the designated day. Employees who do not wish to celebrate Martin Luther King's Birthday on the designated day may use those R hours as .'looting holiday hours to be used within the calendar year. ?he floating holiday hours associated with Ma rt~n Luther King's Birthday are not usable until the designated observance day and must be used 6y December 31. MATERNITY LEAVE The City agrees to grant female employees up to 4 months maternity leave for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on a leave of absence without pay will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence without pay. X10 PLAN OR FLE%-TIME A study on the feasibility of a 4/10 plan, or flex-time plan will be handled on a citywide basis. As part of this Memorandum of Understa nd inq a memo will be sent to the City Manager requesting a citywide study be conducted and recommendations be developed for presentation to the ri*y Cou^.cil o ,.,. .,.-.,..,_ Proper ..~~~ ,~~~_.~~~=s fvi ail City employees. c/ Memorandum of Understanding Page 3 This Memorandum of Understanding is agreed to and accepted and recommended to be incarpo rated in the City's compensation resolution for fiscal year 1989/90. For the Supervisor/Professional: Xv/-~--~ Richard q corn For the ity: Jim Hart Mary K n Anna folaman MEMDRANpM OF UNDERSTANDING Whereas, the representatives of the Maintenance Employees Group and representatives of the City have met and conferred regarding wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment, and; Whereas, Lhe representatives of the Maintenance Employees Group and representatives of the City have reached agreement on items within tf~e scope of Meet and Confer, and; Whereas, the representatives of the Maintenance Employees Group and representatives of the City wish to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the agreements of the Meet and Confer process; Now, therefore, the Maintenance Employees Group and the City of Rancho Cucamonga agree as follows: IMPLEMENTATION All terms and conditions of employment currently in effect and not changed by the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding will remain in effect. Unless otherwise stated, the effective date for implementation of Lhe items in this Memorandum of Understanding is July 3, 1984. The term of Lhis agreement is July 1, 1989 Lh rou gh June 30, 1990. SALARY ADJUSTMENT A base salary increase of 6%. MEDICAL, DENTAL AND OPTICAL COYERADE The City agrees to average the cost of medical, dental and optical benefits for fiscal year 1989/90 including the Principal plan, Kaiser A and C,a re America, thus, providing for r.o additional payment by employees for coverage through June 30, 1990, SICK LEAVE BUYBACK The City agrees to increase the number of accrued sick leave hours it will buy back from employees to 120 hours. The current requirements for eligibility remain in effect. SAFETY FODTNEAR The City agrees to provide E135 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear for employees required to wear safety footwear as a part of their ,106 responsibilities. The City will establish accounts at kna pp Boots and Red Wing Boots for the purchase of the safety footwear, ~~ Memorandum of Understanding Page 2 LIFE INSURANCE The City agrees to increase the ha se coverage for employees by $10,000 to a total of 330,000. All other differentials established 6y previous resolutions remain in effect. Additionally, employees who wish to purchase additional life insurance coverage through the City's offered program may do so in ?'10 000 increments at the group rte. TYie method of payment will be through payroll deduction. OBSERVANCE OF MARTIN LUTHER KING BIRTHDAY The City recognized the importance of the observance of Martin Luther King's Birthday to employees. The City also recognizes the importance of ensuring the private sector is able to conduct business. Therefore, the City grants Martin Luther King's Birthday as a holiday in the following manner: City facilities will not be closed on Martin Luther King's Birthday until such time as the private sector recognizes Martin Luther King's Birthday as a holiday or Lhe federal or state governments mandate that government facilities be closed on that day. Employees who wish to celebrate Martin Luther Y.ing's Birthday may do so on the designated day. Employees who do not wish to celebrate Martin Luther King'S Birthday on the designated day may use those 8 hours as floating holiday hours to be used within the calendar year. The floating holiday hours associated with Martin Luther King's Birthday are not usable until the designated observance day and must be used by December 31, MATERNITY LEAVE The City agrees to grant female employees up to 4 months maternity leave for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on a leave of absence wtthout pay will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence without pay. OVERTIME The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of an impending storm or impe ndinq emergency situation, and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, ro bring the total hours to 8 worked in that shift. Employees who are suhseaurntly reCatt>n r„ work *_he ~tor^ or cmergenc; situation will work no more than IZ consecutive hours. Rny hours worked in excess of 8 in that 12 hour shift will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week. STANODY PAY The City agrees to compensate the employee required to be on standby at the rate of 3128 per week. ~~ Memorandum of Understanding Page 3 PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION Employees required as part of their regular work assignment to work on Christmas Day, New Year's Day, Independence Day, or Thanksgiving Day are Ceemed to be working a premium holiday. These employees who work on Lhe aforementioned premium holidays, can choose to be compensated in either of the two fOllpwing way<_: 1) 8e pai^ titre and one half for working that day and observe the designated holiday at a later date or, 2) Nork that holiday at straight time, and receive 2 days off at a later date. 4/10 PLAN OR fLEX-TIME A study on the feasibility of a 4/10 plan, or flex-time plan will be handled on a citywide basis. As part of this Memorandum of Understanding a memo will be sent to the City Manager requesting a citywide study be conducted and recommendations be developed for presentation to the City Council on proper work schedules for all City employees. This Memorandum of Understanding is agreed to and accepted and recommended to be incorporated in the City's compensation resolution for fiscal year 1989/90. For the ce Gployees: ~- r4-~1 ~a.c is ti iii V %~-~~/ to ~ /99 Greg E hran For the //gity: -__:~~--~~0 aim hart Mary Kuh Do/o~-6'/e try ~~ ~G/~®~ Mark Perry 30 MEFIDRANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Whereas, the representatives of the General Employees Group and representatives of the City have met and conferred regarding wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment, and; Whereas, the representatives of the General Employees Group and representatives of the City have reached agreement on items within the scope of Meet and Confer, and; Whereas, the reDresen to Lives of the General Employees Group and representatives of Lhe City wish to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the agreements of the Meet and Confer process; , Now, therefore, the General Employees Group and the City of Rancho Cucamonga agree as follows: IMPLEMENTATION All terms and conditions of employment currently in effect and not changed by the provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding Will remain in effect. Unless otherwise Sta Led, the effective date for implementation of the items in this Memorandum of Understanding is July 3, 1989. The Le rm of this agreement is Juiy I, 1989 through June 30, 1990. SILLARY ADJUSTMENT x oa se sa iary increase of 6%. MEDICAL. DENTAL AND OPTICAL COVERAGE The City agrees to average the cost of med Teal, dental and optical benefits for fiscal year 1989/90 including the Principal plan, Kaiser A and Care America, thus, providing for no additional payment by employees for coverage through dune 30, 1990, SICK LEAVE BUYBACK ihn City agrees to increase [he number of accrued sick leave hours it will buy back from emnlnyeoe to 1?n hGOri. Tile C.: r`rr+nt re niii roman t5 fp •• ^l;^y ibil icy remain in effect. SAFETY FODTMEAR The City agrees to provide E136 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear far employees required to wear safety footwear as a part of their ,fob responsibilities. The City will establish accounts at Knapp Boots and Red Wing Boots for the purchase of the safety footwear. .31 Memorandum of Understanding Page 2 LIFE INSURANCE The Lity agrees to increase the base coverage for employees by $10,000 to a total of $30,000. All other differentials established by previous resolutions remain in effect. Additionally, employees who wish to purchase additional life insurance coverage through the City's offered program may do so in $10,000 increments at the group rate. The method of payment wiii be through payroll deduction. OBSERVANCE OF MARTIN LUTHER K[N6 RIRTNDAY ' The City recognized Che importance of the observance of Martin Luther King's Birthday to employees. The City also recognizes the importance of ensuring the private sector is able to conduct business. Therefore, the City grants Martin Luther King's Birthday as a holiday in the following manner: City facilities wiil not be closed on Martin Luther King's Birthday until such time as the private sector recognizes Martin Luther King's Birthday as a holiday or the federal or state governments mandate that government facilities be closed on that day. Employees who wish to celebrate Martin Luther King's Birthday may do so on the designated day. Employees who do not wish to celebrate Martin Luther King's Birthday on the designated day may use those 8 hours as floating holiday hours to be used within the calendar year. The floating holiday hours associated with Martin Luther King's Birthday are not usable until the designated observance day and must be used by December 31. MATERNITY LEAVE The City agrees to grant female employees up to 4 months maternity leave for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on a leave of absence without Gay will he responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence without pay. 4/10 PLAN OR FLEE-TINE A study on the feasibility of a 4/10 plan, or flex-time plan will be handled on a citywide basis. As part of this Memorandum of Understanding a memo will 6e sent to the City Manager requesting a citywide study be conducted and recommendations 6e developed for presentation to the ri.y r r, wn ri crnndn ie~ a,,. OdnCrr df 'v rG ~eP •~~ •oi uri bity' eII1p IVy225. Memorandum of Understanding Page 3 This Memorandum of Understanding is agreed to and accepted and recommended to 6e incorporated in the City's compensation resolution for fiscal year 1989/90, For the General: Tom Acosta For the ity: ~~~ Jim Hart _~B ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ Elisa Har Cathy Mori ~2~,-, ~ .uf(.-~ Karen Sto fa Mar/~~ ~~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: lone 21, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LGAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REUEVELOPMENf AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. BACKGROUND : In Fiscal Year 1987/8R, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved maintaining a balance of $5,406,406.78 on the loan to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. This includes $2 Million loaned to the Agency from the City's Park Development Fund in a previous action this evening. ANALYSIS: In order to receive tax increment revenue, the principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate existing debt which will be repaid by the [ax increment received. For this purpose, when [he Project Area was established in Fiscal Year 1982/83, the City loaned money to the Redevelopment Agency in order to establish initial debt, as well as to provide monies for operations. Por deb[ purposes, the City and Agency have continued to maintain this loan from the City, thus ensuring the Agency's receipt of its full tax increment revenue. Hach Fiscal Year, the Redevelopment Agency pays the loan back to ibe t,iiv. im:iuiliuo iilir.i e.~;. wlt{i ihr. tnt i0i:renk:nt r0 vcn ues Wlili li are received fromvthe Trustee, after paying all deb[ on outstanding bonds and agrcammtts. Uuring Fiscal Year 1988/89, the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay to the City a total of $4,003,018.56 towards the principal and interest on the City/Agency loon. At the present time, it is necessary 3~ for the Agency to continue the loan with the City, in order to show sufficient debt to receive the full amount of tax increment revenue. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to authorize the Agency to repay and re-borrow the full amount of $4,003,018.56. Respectfully submit[ed, Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager 3.5 -~ ---~-~- CITI' OF' RAVCH(1 CI'CA~IOVG.1 STAFF REPORT ,-~;~,~ DATE: June 21, f989 ~5,`'[`~~'~)({'" T0: City Council and City Manager '~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ BY: Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: Approval to purchase vehicle lifts and adapters from Sefac Lift and Equipment Corporation of Columbia, Maryland, for the amount of $28,365.18 to be funded from account numbec 25-4285-7043 (FY 88-89). It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of: One set of four (4) heavy duty vehicle lif to and required adapters to Sefac Lift and Equipment Corporation of Columbia, Maryland, as the lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of twenty eight thousand three hundred sixty five dollars and eighteen cents (528,365.78). The purchase to be funded from account 25-4285-7043. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At 2:00 on Wednesday, June 7, 1989, the City Clerk received bid proposals for one set of four (4) electromechanical mobile lifts. These unite are required by the mechanics of the City in-house vehicle and equipment maintenance at aff. The flexibility of these lifts will enable the safe lifting of the various heavy duty vehicles and equipment for below chassis service and repairs. The bid proposals provided to the vendors included City staff generated specif icationa to respond to the diversity of vehicles within the City fleet at present and the foreseeable future. Bids were submitted and received from Sefac Lift and Equipment Ccrpcraticn, of Columbia. Maryland and A & M Equi pmnnt of Maheim, California representing Rotary Lift of Hemphis, Tennessee. The bid received fcom B A M Equipment fails to comply with the specification as requested by the City Staff in regard [o a safety consideration deemed critical by the Maintenance Staff. Substan[ieting this response ere the recommendations of Fleet Maintenance Consultants of Huston, Texas, who are the consultants to the City for the design and furnishing of the interim equipment and vehicle maintenance facility. ~ ~ SEFAC CORPORATION ,TUNE 13, 1989 PAGE 2 In that the B & M Equipment (Rotary) bid is non responsive with regard to the inability to provide the City the equipment per the provided specifications, Staff is recommending award to the second responsible bidder. The bid received from Sefac Lift and Equipment Corporation is in compliance by meeting or exceeding the City specifications on all performance and safety items. Rea all submitted, RAM:~P 3~7 - ---- -- - CiT1' OF RAtiCHU Cl'CANO?vGA STAFF REPORT ~ , ~ ~~, , ~. / DATE: June 21, 1989 ~'~~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: Approval to purchase electronic diagnostic engine analyzer from Sun Electric Corporation of Santa Ana, California, for the amount of 526,677.95 to be funded frog account number 01-4647-7044 and I.G.S. (FY 88-89). i t RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of: One electronic diagnostic engine analyzer to Sun Electric Corporation of Santa Ana, California, es the lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of twenty six thousand six hundred seventy seven dollars and ninety five cents (526,677.95). The purchase to be funded from account Oi-4647-7044 and I.G.S. BACEGROUND/ANALYSIS At 2:00 on Friday, June 9, 1989, the City Clerk received bid proposals for one electronic diagnostic engine analyzer. This equipment is required by the mechanics of the City in-house vehicle and equipment maintenance staff. The diversity and specialization of the equipment and vehicles within the City fleet requires the flexibility of this unit to aid in the coat effective evaluation and repairs by the in-house fleet maintenance personnel. Bids were submitted and received from Sun Electric Corporation of Santa Ane, California, Beer Automotive Service Equipment Company of Santa Fe Springs, California, and Allen Test Products of Riverside, California. The bids received from Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and Allen Teat Products fail tc CGmpiy with the specifications as requested by the City Staff. The bid received from Sun Electric Corporation is in compliance by meeting or exceeding the City specif icationa on all performance end equipment items. ResDy~ /gully submittedr Y ,~/ RHM:~P y -~-~~ '~ ~ / g -- CITY" OF RdNCHO CCOAMONG~ STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 ` , T0: City Council and City Manager J '~, FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SUDJ ECT: Award the Feron 8aulevard Improvement Project, from Ramona ~' Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, for the amount of 369,828.60, to be funded from CDBG Funds Account No. 28-4333-8194 I (FY 88/89) '~. It is recommended that the City Council accept alt bids as submitted and award the contract for Feron Boulevard Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Laird Construction, for the amount of 569,828.b0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 8, 1989, for the subject project. Laird Construction is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of 569,828.60 {see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 577,856.00. Staff F~~ ~.I ~....A .11 LlA~ ..I ~~~A ...A i~ ~..A tA~~. t~ A~ .o.l..M ..a !.. -. O..y . - accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectful ubmi tted, i~~,~-~ ~ii RH :ly Attachment rr purrhacinn G G 6 V p2 0 yM1 2 ~F( n Z F C N '- £ Z V v Z l7 R1 m ~ d H 6 n t o a a a P m m M O A O N D a O N ~i O O s O s o ~ o .. ~, „ ~~ ~ ~ ~ m , a M _ o 0 0 ° u °o e F- • _ N £ n vmt -~ m C tv P j rt ~ ~+ K .~ .y 1+ O O O 0 0 `~ S S e ~ ~ r v ~ ,. ~ ~, a .. .. a a ~ o ~ n .. ~ e .. ° ° ° ° g m o o o a •• ` N o f o ni g _ c Q N n _ Q 1 p r. r,.. C .. C G t~ ~r .~ ~ :3 iv ,~ O O C F _ O O C p .i v ~ , Q y ~ ~. c. ~n ~. c .n r ~ n ~ O O ~ - a ,.. ~- ~- i Q C ^~ o ~ ~~ E m fe E ~ ~ y , r m ~n O c J 4 E t) ~ ~ 4 y ~ N L qE J o FR p ~~ ~ - ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Y DATE; June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement !, Project at the intersections of Base Line Road and Ramona 'I Avenue (Account No. 12-4637-8826), Base line Road and Valencia (Account No. 12-4637-8827), and Haven Avenue and ~~ Victoria Street (Account No. 12-4637-8832) far the amount I of 5179,605.00, to be funded with TDA Article 8 Funds i (FY 88/89) RECONIEIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract fur Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, 5lerra Pacific Electrical, for the amount of 5119,605.00, BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Oon nenvinue rnunril aril nn hiAe wnn en11r1t•oA ror>1uaA anA nnnnaA nn June 8, 1989, for the subject project. Sierra Pacific Electrical is the apparent Lowest responslble bidder with a bid amount of 5179,605.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 5185,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp y~bmitted, ~~~_ i v~ i ~__-~ RNM: Lo:iV Attachment cc: Purchasing ~~ 0 o ~ C V Z` tJ N 8 U O G w N ~ M 8 O ~ O N N w V O K G 2 V d~M 6 t 7V i p dt Y <CN N W qu ~ ~=s` Y d ~ ~ -- 4a N oaA p~V C N gI gIV ~-+~ LL C ` ddV p [ Y- m02 H V i'n a ~ ~ 8 ryN mpN N S~ O Di 8 N NM O J~ S 0 8 8 ~ ~ m J ~ J 8 S 8 w ~ ~ ~ ~ N b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D) J J J .. L O 1- p O p O p O O tJ S O N O < G I N ~J x W y m J J J ~ j p J 8 8 g i g ~ ~ ~ o a ~ s y e y O Y 3 Q J N j 3 eL J J J N N m ~ ~ F S O 8 O F W ~ O b O e n a'J Z r i L d vl <t t R t~ W m J J J w gLA "d ~ ~ o ~ c4y O C ~ N N N p v A C J J J 8A U CC ~1 YI N y ~ dL C S yy 9YCd C yy YYC ~V G4 yy Ail}M TS ~ NNE a > .e A e c y A A ~ ~ ~ 1- mN S I C mA WC m A SA ~ / /~ +~9Q ~ N~F~ N O A rAY.I N O O M r~ N ~ y « W / C ~ ° G C ~r a ~ ~~ ~~o ~ g ~ < € a ~ ~~~~ F ~~~ ~ ~q .. ~ M 8 e 8 P N~ m g 8~ G OLL O - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAh10NCA ~~~n~oN ~- STAFF REPORT ~~" , `O=. i x~-~'~ 4- 1 .: Z Z ~; Date: June 21, 1989 == i~_ o i I To: Mayor, Members of the Council and City Manager ' From: Soe Schultz, Community Services Manager Ali By: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Manager Subject: Award of the Old Town improvement project for ~' ' the amount of $912,253.00 to be funded from ' Park Development fund no. 20-4532-8611 '~, City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the it contract for Old Town Park improvements to the lowest responsible bidder, Martin J. Jaska, Inc. for the amount of ~ $912,253.00 plus 10$ contingency. Funding to be from Park Development Pund 20-4532-8611 and Community Block Grant fund 28-4333-9181. ATI.PI`OI~TTiTT. ?er previous council action, bids were received an3 opened on May 24, 1989 for construction improvement of old Town Park. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. submitted the ~, lowest responsible bid in the amount of $912,940.00. Review ~~, of the bid reveal a calculation error of $697.00 revising the I bid downward to $912,253.00. The architects estimate for tha ! project was $1,025,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be ' complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Additionally, staff has completed the required backgrnnnd investigation and finds the law bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. I~ S ~a~~ >~II al ~I m~ °.I I ~I I _, ~~ '-ii I ~I a _~ of=i j, _I =~='~: _ ~, ~, _. ~~~~ II _~,-,- `) `II ~,~~ µi ~_ ~ _ ,_ _ P~ ~~ ~-- C[TY OF R.tNCHO CliCAbtONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 ~~ ~~ T0: City Council and City Manager I '~, FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ', ~~, BY: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to award and execute a Professional Service ~, Agreement for design services relating to the ', 'I Beautification and Art Study and Nexus to J. F. Davidson ' Associates, Inc., for the amount of 537,000 to be funded ~I from Beautification Funds, Account Number 21-4641-8871 '~. RECOMENOATION: It is recommended that the City Council award the project for the Beautification and Art Study and Nexus to J. F. Davidson Associates, inc., authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for said project and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 540,000.00 (537,000.00 plus 53.000.00 contingency) to be funded from Beautification Fund, Account Number 21-4647-8871, Background/Analysis It has become necessary to review and update the City's Bead ti fica Lion Fee structure and establish a nexus between that fee, or cost to development, and benefits derived by development from beautification improvements. Assembly Bill 1600, which took effect on January 1 of this year, requires the City to analyze this cost to benefit relationship and establish a fee structure accordingly. i ~ ii. ~Y> •~- ._, RHM:W0.tsjar ~ Respect s bmitted, / + ~' j~ ~1 - ---- CITI' OF RANCHO CCCAy10NG~1 STAFF REPORT ~C`~ DATE: June 21, 1989 ~ ,~"~ ,, T0: City Council and City Manager ~C3r FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician ~,, SUBJECT: Approval of a Subordination Agreement for Parcel '- of Parcel Map 3298, located on 10010 Almond Street, submitted by Wen-Da Hsu and Chang Li-Hua Hsu 'i, RECOMIEIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Subordination Agreement submitted by Wen-Da Hsu and Chang Li-Hua Hsu and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause the agreement to record. Background/Analysis A Real Property Improvement Contract and lien Agreement Was accepted by the City Council and recorded on October 29, 1981, as document No. 81-239269 in the official Records of San 8ernardlno County, State of California for construction of offsite improvements including curb, gutter and pavement. In order to secure financing for his project, the lender requires that the subject Lien Agreement be subordinated to liens in favor of the lender. Wen-Da Hsu and Chang Li-Hua Hsu has submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. Respec tf stub itted, RHM:WV. Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. V f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM WEN-DA HSU AND CHRNG LI-HUA HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of off-site improvements, including curb, gutter and pavement was approved Dy City Council on August 19, 1981, and recorded in San Bernardino County on October 29, 1981, Instrument No. 81-239249; and WNEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires th:t Lh2 abC:o_~r_nfi oned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and NHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordination Agreement to 4hat effect for the City's approval and execution. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordination Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. ~~ a< .:._ ~., ~~ r w aC~ l., ~cw~ >! ~•) e. n r -®- -,~ _r-~- I ~.~: ..i., P~,. ~ ~ i w.c , lo.c - ak"~-~~. - .,: PARCEL MAP 3298 PARCEL 1 .a..c .l~K Wt ~. l] r CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ ~~ 11 ]N .[ Wl ': ~~~ :~`~ 1 t __ ...<. ~i ni.e. a...wo'rlia~ I'rI Boots YOI Wp 07 1\ rrra~: iooio A/ma.,dSf. TITLE: PARCEL MAP 3298 ~i°ar. /~ EXHIBIT: ------ ---- CITI' OF RAtiCHO CCC'AMONGA STAFF REPORT r-~.~ -~: ~- - ; DATE: June 21, 1989 }~~ TD: City Council and City Manager ~~l FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~~ 0Y: Nillie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Cooperative Agreement with Department of ~~' Transportation, State of California (Caltrans) for the improvements of State Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) located ~~, between the Deer Creek Channel and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Caltrans ~, RECDMIEIMTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subfect agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the said agreement. Background/Analysis Lewis Homes of California 1s required to construct the Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) improvements between Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue .. +.._...+__ +a~. av.. +...~..i ...«...• ..G •AM. Tn...a Viela Dwnio_r to Tn ~~~ CLno ~~~...~~~~ ::~.~~ .~ ... ..... .....r....... ~. ..._.~ ._.._ ..___ order to receive the necessary permits from Caltrans for the said construction, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to act as a lead agency for dealing with Caltrans and this cooperative agreement will facilitate receiving the necessary approvals from Caltrans for the protect. Respec su mi ted, /~l RHM:pY-sdm-~ Attar nrent ~' RESOLUTION N0. ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT KITH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSDORTATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRANS) FOR IMPROYEMENTS OF STATE ROUTE 66 (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the City Council of the rf ty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Cooperative Agreement, from the Department of Transportation, State of California (Caltrans) for the improvements of State Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) and generally located between the Oeer Creek Channel and Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, the construction of such improvements, described in said Cooperative Agreement and subject to the terms Lhereof, is to be done by Lewis Homes, Inc. in conjunction with the Terra Vista Development; and WHEREAS, in order to receive the necessary permit from Caltrans for the said construction, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to act as the lead agency for dealing with Caltrans and the said Cooperative Agreement is to facilitate the receiving of necessary approvals of Caltrans. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Cooperative Agreement be hereby approved and the Mayor 15 hereby authorized to sign said Cooperative Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ -- ----- CITI' OF RA\(:H(t Cl'CAyIONG~ STAFF REPORT ~; ,ry, _ ;,'~ ,• DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager °1~~~'. ~~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~~ BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SU "a.iECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement, Imo rovement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Oi strict No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 88-25, located on the south side of Sharon Circle, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by tndumar Investments, Inc. RECOMEIDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions aDDroving DR 88-25, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering Lhe annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND OR 88-25, located on the south side of Sharon Circle, east of Hermosa Avenue, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Specific Plan, was approved by the Dlanning Commission on Octoher 6, 1988, for the d1V1S10n Ot 1, 6U acres iu w i yu~C21. The Developer, lndumar Investments, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the full owi ng amounts: Faithful Performance Cash: f3,200.00 Labor and Material Cash: f1,600.00 Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to A~nexatien form stgned by the Developer is on file..//in the City Clerk's office. Respec~X"yliy s, tted, ~~ ~~ } RHM:WY?JAllisjm Attachments 53 RESOLUTION N0. gq- .~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 88-25 NHEREAS, the City Council of California, has for its consideration June 21, 1989, by Indumar Investments, of public right-of-way adjacent to the therein, and ge ~erally located on the Hermosa Avenue; and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, an Improvement Agreement ezecu ted on Inc. as developer, for the improvement real property sDecifi cal ly described south side of Sharon Ci rcie, east of WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 88-25; and MHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the Ct ty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 8 / ' t7 ~ W A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUClWONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION Of CERTAIN TERR iTORY TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 88-25 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance disU-ict pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein 6y this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of DroDerty within the territory proDOSed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2; That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas a5 described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including~ieTevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. sS x~r ~ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 I i ~' ~ l -V4CANT- ~ ~ -~ ~: SITE \~\\ a ; ~ ~~ ~\ _ ~~~ ;. a I Ia 1' I ~•V~ti ~ tEN41T lQUST~I ~i SDCTH ST ~ ~y ( :a; street L,yrit ,.~;~~~:; crrY or aarrcao cuca>rtoxoa ~ n a ~s-~s ~„~~, covrrrY or Bart saaxa»n~o ' - 3 sraTS or caaaonxca -~--~' EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: DR 88-25 N0. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 1.50 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 3 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No, of Lamps tc be Annexed District No. 1 --- °- --- --- --- 6 1 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf 1\V. JII CCI I\OIIF Jq. 1L. 3 --- -__ J AA:6/21/89 Ground Cover Trees iq, rc. ta, ~~ --- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer EY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT; Approval of Improvement Agreement and [mpravement Security for Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Sapphire Street 'I and Hillside Road, submitted by Hillside/Sapphlre Venture i RECOMEIOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security of Tract 13728, and authorizing the Mayor and the Ctty Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13128, located on the northwest corner of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road, in the Very Law Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission an November 25, 1987, for the division of 20 acres into 34 lots. The Developer, Hillside/Sapphlre Venture, is submitting an agreement and >e~u rl iJ w yum au i.ee Lim wu5 u'uCti uii v. tim vu-a my7v.ces,~.. •ite - - •,r •;;c following amounts: Storm Drains Faithful Performance Bond: 474,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 537,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp submitted, /u.., ~ r~~~~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0, g~J "~ 7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NO. 13128 NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite Lo approval of the Final Map of Tract 13728, H111side/Sapphire Venture, Subdivider, has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ Q - ~- 7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT N0. 11734 WHEREAS, to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements, Lewis Homes of California has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approvai and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subiect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. ~v 8~~ ~a~e`~;e 'I ~..I -® ~ ~I~I .. ~~ ~;~ ~J `` .~ - A_ m ~. m ~~ a ~e '~ T~sr i ,i~~ ~ --~ ~'~ ~ L__ cN ~r--._. ior --.~w~r r__ . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ ENGII~tEERTriO DIVISION "" V N PI'EM: Tror,~// 7,3d Tats: ..:~~: CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA n STAFF REPORT "~ J J DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ~, FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector`~,~ ~I SUBJECT: Approval of improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13715, ', located on the northeast corner of Jennett Street and Exeter Court, submitted by Walton Construction Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subiect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Imorovement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of~ the public improvements for Tract 13715 were approved by the City Council on June 2, 1988, in the following amounts. raiznrui verrormance nano: ~tiw,wu ana >iy,uw labor and Material Bond: f22,000 and f9, 500 The developer, Walton Construction Company, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respect y subml d, RHM: $kG.s;~ Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~q~~77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13115 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June Zi, ig8g, by Walton Construction Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Jennett Street and Exeter Court; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13715; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Exten si an on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~5 RESOLUTION N0. V I _ ~ X O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR 6809 HELLMAN AVENUE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 21, 1989, by Laslo Yass as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ayacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on 4he east side of Hellman Avenue, north of 19th Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said 6809 Hellman Avenue; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvoment Agreement Extension on Dehalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~g June 5, 19x9 City ~° Rancho Cucamonga W Sox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, C.:. 91730 SC3.ifiC?: 3egveat for extenaion of Improvement agreement fo^ 5909 Aell~an. i+0: City cngiaeeriag .1s yaur records have indicated the Improvement n3reement for o;03 Hellman will expire on July o, 1959. During the tine aertod of the a~-reement than*ea hav~• occu^ed regard- in? tie property. ., larzer portion of the property in question has been sold to Hix Development Corporat`on along with the exiet- in;.y land surroundi.^., it.~a par`• of the 3t~yer/Seller a~reenent Hix Development Corporation has agreed to com- ~lete all tronta3e improvement required by the Cityy of '.'.*:ancho Cucamonga on i8C9 Hellman and on both parcels of ?roperty surrounding it.Phis improvement +::111 take effect iron the final a?proval by the City of the Hix Developnsnt Cor?oration track map. 3ecaus=, oY t:.e uncertainty ,n the data of approval concern- in•; the start of development on the t:•ack map we request an extenaion of a 12 month period. Sinc `~ 1/~V~1 Laszlo Vasa ~! VY :,.~. K ij rrmv nn o e nir rrn r r rr e aanur_ e STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Millie Val6uena, Engineering Technician .: i~ ,; SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 11734, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway, submitted by Lewis Homes of California I RECOMIENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subfect agreement and security of Tract 11734 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 11734, located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway, in the Medium Density Residential DTstrict, was approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 1988, for the division of 8.5 acres Into 5 lots. The Developer, Lewis Homes of California, is submitting an agreement and seturi Ly i.u yuarmitee Lice was Lru~Liun ui Liie uii-site imyruvemen Ls in ii~e following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f182,400.00 Labor and Material Bond: f 91,200.00 Copies of the agreement and security are ava11a61e 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respec su it d, .-~ - -~. RNM:wV:~jm % ~J Attachments ~-t~ I N CITY OF 1TEY: Tiz~~t f3~28 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~G TTfL~ Errc~Exu~rc Dtvi.~ox err. Thy \ I /u~tun Associated Companies ~ 2011 evt linencial wey / pwi office box 775 /Etlilomie 91710 / (B18) 963~BB05 I ;` ~,./ v~ '`~ } May 23, 1989 ~ Fax ~ ~ F~.~ `, " -..,. i City of Rancho Cucamonga P .O. Roz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Re: Tract 13715 Gentlemen: Pursuant to your letter dated April 20, 1989, we are sending a signed copy of your Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13715 and a check in the amount of 5251.00. We anticipate completion of this work to be appzoximaiely six (6) months from codays date. The only things we are lacking are final completion of the horse trail, improvement gueter, fencing and slope landscaping. Thank you Eor your time and consideration in this matter and if you should have any questions, please Eeel free to call this office. Sincerely, WALTON CONGTROCTION CORPOAATION lyde And~r,G; President CEA/plh ^~~;~~~~ enc. . 1 . ~'dl^i~,~.! f,W'F M08Cu1 ENL~NEENiNG OIYISWN ~~ ~~~ Associated --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _~ DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~~i BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto~~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for 6809 Hellman Avenue, lotated on the east side of Hellman Avenue, north of 19th Street, submitted by Laslo Vass RECOMEMDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,{ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for 6809 Hellman Avenue were approved by the City Council on July 7, 1988, in the following amounts. raizorui reriunwnce ounJ: io,2u"G,Gv Labor and Material Bond: 53,100.00 The developer, Laslo Vass, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the Ctty Clerk's Office. Respectfu fitted_,_,~.__~~ - / "! RNM: . s,{m Attachments -- CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r- CATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~I, BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13644, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Court, submitted by Noodridge Estates, Ltd RECONMENDATiOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13644 were approved by the City Council on Myy 19, 1988, in the following amounts: Fai Li,iul ."Oi fGi u,ur,Cc ~JBd: ~~ec nnn Labor and Material Bond: f24E,000 The developer, Woodridge Estates, Ltd., is requesting approval of a 4-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe ~~bm j~ted, RFDA:SNG:sd % ~ Attachments 70 RESOLUTION N0. ~ r ~~~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13644 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 21, 1989, by Woodridge Estates, Ltd. as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way aQiacent to the real Droperty specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Vista Grove Court; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,{ect to the terns thereof, 1s to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13644; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extenslon 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extenslon. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extenslon and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~I NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 22, 1989 Steve M. Gilliland ~ ~ '"^~ Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917]0 ••, u~oaVEE,u ,ud RE: Tract 13644 wG O;ysi~(tl Dear Mr. Gil l,iland: Enclosed herewith are three (3) executed copies of a Request for Extention of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13644, along with our check in the sum $251.00. We will need an additional 12o days in which to complete the Tract. A substantial portion of the of£site work is complete. If yov have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, WOODRZDGE ESTATES, LTD. A Limited Partnership, BY: NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ~~it~a~r;eneral Partner Narri T. Keto, Secretary N7K:klb Enclosure(s) ~~ ioroo rt.xr u.o wm.aa nr.ncra c~crna«:. c. s~,w nu~wor~ee -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOftT J DATE: June 21, 1989 ~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~~-> it BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspect SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for OR 87-26 located at the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue, li submitted by Matson Land Company RFCOIftEMOATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and CTty Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for DR 87-26 were approved by the City Council on Mareh 16, 1988, in the following amounts. Fai iiii ui ~criun.uuca ~uiw: '..°.a,~9C Labor and Material Band: f41S,000 The developer, Matson Land Comparyr, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respec Y y ted, ~% RHM:S Attachments 73 RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ~~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ExTENSION ANO IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 87-26 MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on dune 21, 1989, by Matson Land Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad3acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast corner of Arrow Hi ghwdy and Rochester Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conJunction with the development of said DR 67-26; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOw, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are Hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorl:ed to sign satd Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 7 ~{ WATSON LAND COMPANY February 14, 1989 Mr. Steve Gilliland Public works Inspector City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Rcad P.o. Sox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 a .. ,~'.Y t'.: y 'CIA •.• idi ~ moil Re: Expiration of Improvement Agreement for DR 87-26. Dear Mr. Gilliland The purpose of this letter is to request an extension of time on our Improvement Agreement for our project at Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. We have been waiting for some time for the Southern California Edison transmission crew to relocate the 66kv linec runninn_ alnnn Lrrnw Hi n_hvav M allow nor rnnf rwr*nr to pave both Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. Due to inclement weather consisting of rain and high winds, the schedule has fallen behind. While we have requested a six month extension for the Agreement, we expect that the work will be completed prior to that date. Attached is the Improvement Agreement Extension which has been notarized as well as a check for ;251.00. Very truly yours, Gerald C. Weeks Vice President Acquisitions & Development :sc 7-S 77010 SOUTH WILMINGTON AVEN UE, URSO N. CALIFORNIA 90115 (7f )) I)S~lIB6 --CITY OF RAtiCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1969 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~, BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspect a-~ ~. ~!I SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ~ RECOMEIWITIOM: The required street improvements for OR 85-06 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner and 1t is recomaended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5338,190. Background/Analysis DR 85-06 - located an the north side of Arrow Highway between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue. DEVELOPER: Lincoln Rancho 310 North Nestlake Boulevard X200 _ _,~~ wl, ...- r~ otta9 nca •~u uy~, Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5318,190.00 Respect s~ fi~jtt/ed, V RHM: :d Attachment 7~ RESOLUTION N0. X `t' - ~ X A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85-06 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 85-06 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer Ts authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 7/ --- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ~~~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector`s ~i~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completfon ~'~ RECOMIEMDATIOM: ~~~. The required street improvements for DR 85-31 have been completed in an i' acceptable manner and it is recomaended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the following amounts: Street Storm Drain (156,000 5107,000 Background/Analysts DR 85-31 -located on 4he northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street DEVELOPER: A.H. Reiter Development P.0. Box 7250 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Release: faithful Performance Bond Re spectfull ubmitted, RHM:S Gad ~ ~~ ' Attachment Street Storm Drain 5156,000 S107,00 -~~ RESOLUTION N0. !l 9~~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLlC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85-31 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 85-31 have been comple±ed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, Lhat the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 71 - --- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ` ~. DATE: June 21, 1989 ~; T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspectoc`~~..... SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Tract 13058 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of (75,000, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Comp]etTOn and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f750,000.00. Background/Analysis tract 13058 - on the west side of Fairmont May, south of Highland Avenue DEVELOPER: M1111am Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite B kancno wcamonga, un virsu Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) 375,000 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 3750,000 Res~pectf submitted, / 7 ~ '~ RNM: S~,:s3~ Attachment O RESOLUTION N0. ~S'' `Q~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13058 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13058 have been completed to the satt sfactt on of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT li DATE: dune 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager i ~,,~ FROM: P.ussell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gillfland, Public Works Inspector.`J/~C SUBd ECi: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMEMOATIDN: ~y- .~_ti~ J, The required street improvements for Tracts 12650 and 12650-4 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is retonmended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amounts of 521,000 end 536,000, authorize the City Engtneer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amounts of 5210,000 and 1360,000. Background/Analysts Tracts 12650 and 12650-4 - located an the southwest corner of Canistel Avenue and Deer Canyon Drive DEVELOPER: The Deer Creek Company ' r ~uD V L I,.G MY C1111C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Tract 12650 Tract 12650-4 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 121,000 136,000 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5210,000 1360,000 Respectf 1 tt ed , ~~ ~ •~~_~~ ~ ~ ~ -; ~ i RHM: Sl~lrsd~ Rttachment RESOLUTION N0. X ~t"_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 12650 AND 12650-4 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 12650 and 12650-4 have been completed to the satisfaction of the Ct ty Engf neer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Compiett on Ts required to be filed, certifying the work complete. HON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Nottce of Completion with the County Recorder of San 8ernardlno County. ~3 ---- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCANONGA STAFF REPORT ~~ ~ DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager / j FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer I BY: Steve M. G111iland, Public Works InspectQr~+1%-~" SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12362 located on the ~~ south side of Base Line Road between Hellman Avenue and i Lion Street It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance Deriod has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Tac Development 9513 Business Center Drive NB ~6iiC ~~J wCuwwi,y'u, .°„", :1)3.^. !coo Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 516,000 Respect 1 ubmitted, -, RHM; - ----- CITI' OF RANCHO Ci: CAJIONGA STAFF REPORT -~ DATE: June 21, 1989 ;,~1 TD: City Council and City Manager vv I FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Dubuc Works Inspector '~, SUBJECT: Accept the Archibald Avenue Widening, from north of '. Highland Avenue to south of Lemon Avenue, Contract No. I, 88-162 as complete, release bonds and authorize the City I Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" REC01/ENDATIBN: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Archibald Avenue Widening, from north of Highland Avenue to south of Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 88-162 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5124,925.15 and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 515,179.65 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 5124,925.15, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of 5151,796.48. Background/Analysts The subiect pro,lect has been completed 1n accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is 5151,796.48 which includes three minor change orders for wall relocation, striping changes and signing changes. Respec 1~C /~d, i -~-------~1~-% RHM: cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION N0. ~ ( - ~ X 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ARCHIRALD AVENUE WIDENING, FROM NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE,ICONTRACT N0. 88-162) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements far Archibald Avenue Widening, from north of Highland Avenue to south of Lemon Avenue (Contract No. 88-162) have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~P --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _~ ,N' STAFF REPORT %$~ DATE: June 21, 1989 _~ TD: City Councii and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, C1ty Engineer BY: MTchael O. long, Senior Public Works Inspector ~~~ SUBJECT: Accept the Hillside Road Improvement and Storm Drain, from ~ Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 88-092, as complete, release bonds and authorize the CTty Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" ~i, It is recommended that the City Council accept the Hillside Road Improvement and Storm Drain, frog Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue Improvement Pro,lect as coaglete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in LAe amount of 5432,360.80 and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 120,661.41 and the Labor and Matertais Bond in the amount of 5432,360.80, 35 days after the recordation of said notice Tf no claims have been received. Also, approve the f1na1 contract amount of 5413,228.17. Background/Analysis The sublect project has been completed 1n accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is 5413,228.17 which includes 1 minor change order for utility delays and minor storm drain modification. Respectf 1 , ubmitted, „~, /'. RHM:MDL:s~q cc: Pcrchasing RESOLUTION N0. ~ 1 ~ ~V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HILLSIDE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND STORM DRAIN, FROM MALACHITE STREET TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE, CONTRACT NO 88-092, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of pu611c improvements for HTllside Road Street Improvements and Storm Drat n, from Malachite Street to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. 88-092, have been completed Lo the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanwnga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sfgn and file a Notice of Compietion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ----- CITS' OF RANCHO CI;CA~IONGA STAFF REPORT ,...,~~ DATE: June 21, 1989 ~ T0: City Council and City Manager y ~'~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer II BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Publlic Norks Inspector !, SUBJECT: Accept the Neliman Avenue Storm Drain, from the Southern ~~ Pacific Railroad Crossing to Monte Vista Street (Contract '~, No. 88-164) as ca~lete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" RECOMIENOATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Nell man Avenue Storm Drain, from the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing to Monte Vista Street Contract No. 88-164 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completton", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f1,188,225.25 and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of f125,704.45 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of f594,113.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of f1,257,044.45, Background/Analysis The sub,iect pro,iect has been completed 1n accordance with the approved pions and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is f1,257,044.45. Res~Gt Tly suomitted, 7(~ - ~~ ~i` RH .M'MDC~diw cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~~ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE STORM DRAIN, FROM THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROW CROSSING TO MONTE VISTA STREET, (CONTRACT N0. 88-164) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILIHG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of publfc improvements for Hellman Avenue Storm Drain, from the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing to Monte Vista Street, Contract No. 88-164 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 90 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SU&IECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY VARIANCE - reques o gra a an pave approx ma e y acres of land and a request to reduce the parking setback from 25 feet to 8 feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to 8 feet in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 91, located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, bedeen Utica and Vincent Avenues - APM 209-1?3-07, O8, 8 09 narnl~lPwnarrnu~ This is an appeal by a councilmember of a Planning Commission dental of a Variance request and the associated Minor Oevelopment Review. fie City Council should hold the required public hearing miJ naie an apyrupriu ie Je Lt,,x iua Liuu. BACKGROUND; This item has a long history, as briefly outlined below: In July of 1988, Minor Development Review 87-71 was aDDroved by the City Planner, allowing the 12 acre industrial site be graded and paved subject to conditions requiring full improvements along the public frontage on Jersey Boulevard. This included street improvements, screening, landscaping and undergrounding of ut111ties, as required by current regulations. These Improvements would have brought the site into conformance with the Industrial Specific P1 an. The applicant appealed these conditions to the Planning Commission, and the Commission valved the undergrounding requirement. However, the requirement for full public improvements and landscaping along Jersey Boulevard was upheld. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VA 89-04 b MDR 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS June 21, 1989 Page 2 The applicant appealed the remaining requirements to the City Council. In February of this year, the Council denied the appeal; however, the Council felt that some relief from the Conditions of Approval was appropriate, in that the scope of on site improvements was rather limited. The CauncTl directed staff and the applicant to develop a reasonable improvement plan, with only partial improvements to be required. Most recently, the Clty Council has reviewed this proposal on February 1, 1989. The Council reviewed the modified development plan, with partial improvements (Exhibit "B"), and agreed in concept that the proposal represented a reasonable compromise. However, it was determined that a l~eriance would be required, and the applicant was advised to file fora Variance. The Planning Commission held the required public hearing on the Yarlance on April 26. During the hearing, testimogy from business people in the area was presented in opposition to the Variance. At the close of the hearing, the Commission felt that the findings required for the granting of a Yerlance could not be made and denied the request. Staff was therefore requested Lo prepare resolutions of denial (Exhibit I d I1 )for the protect. Because Commercial Carriers aDDlted for the Variance based on the Council's direction, Councilman Alexander requested the item be u, uuyiiL w Liie iuii wwi~ii iu, wuai uc~dtiu~i. ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION: The Yartance as presented to the Planning Commission would result in full improvements on approximately 40% of the property frontage, partial improvements on about 305, and virtually no improvements on the remaining 305. The area to remain unimproved is located in front of the office structure, in the easterly portion of the site, at the Lerminus of Red oak Avenue. Currently, a 36' strip of pavement used for parking abuts right up to the street, with no landscaping between the curb and the parking area. This substandard condition was the subtect of much concern to the Planning Commission and one of the reasons for denial of the Variance. The attached Commission Minutes and Staff ReDOrt with attachmw!nts provide additional background information for your consideration. 9~- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VA 89-04 b MDR 87-71 - COMIERCIAL CARRIERS ,lone 21, 1989 Page 3 AVAILABLE OPTIONS: The available options are: 1. Uphold the Commission action, denying the Variance; 2. Reverse the Commission decision, approving the Variance and Minor Development Review; 3. Approve the Variance and Mfnor Development Review with modlflcations. With Council direction, Staff will prepare appropriate Resolutions. Res liy s to t~ Bra Bu r City nner BB:OK :sp Attachments: Exhibits 18 tI - Resolutions of Denial Exhibit III - Planning Commission Ml notes, April 2b, 1989 Exhibit IY - Dlanntng Commission Staff Report, April 2g, 1989, with attachments A, Band C ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-66 A RESOLUTION OF 1HE PLANNING Cg4N1S5I0N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNiONGA DENYING VARIMICE N0. 89-04 TO REDUCE THE PARKING SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 8 FEET AND REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 8 FEET FOR 12 ACRES OF LAN3 LOCATED ON 1HE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOJLEVARD BETNEEN UTICA AND VINCENT AVENUES IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUGAR EII 9), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-143,-07, OB, 09 A. Recitals. (1) Coataerctal Carriers has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 89-04 as demribed in the title of this Remiution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the wb,lect Yariance request is referred to as "the apps icatlon". (ii) On April 26, 1988, the Planning Coanissl0n of the City of Rancho Cucaaarga conNCted a duly noticed puD11c hearing on the application and continued said hearing to laty 10, 1988. (111) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Remiution have accurrod. B. Remiution. NON, THFRffORE, it 1s hereby found, deterarined and remived by the Planning Coasaisslon of the Lity of Ranhho Cucataorga as follows: 1. rots Colllllisston rKroey ap6lTiUlly TindS iliac ail ui ii,e ia~L> set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of ibis Remiution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial eviderce presented to this Coawission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 26, 1989, and continued W May 10, 1989, including written and oral staff roports, together with public testinggy, this Coawisslon hereby speclf1ca11y finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property totaled at 10807 Jersey Boulevard with a stroet frontage of 814 feet aM an average lot depth of 673 feet and 1s proseMly fagroved with an office, warehouse, and parking lot; and (b) The property to the north of the wD,Tect site is rwultt- tenant industrial, tfie property to the south of that Site consists of a warenouse, the property oo the east is vacant, and the property to the west is a warehouse; and (c) The application applies Lo a site that is currently 1~rwed with an office building, warehouse Duildirg and parking tot and is considered a legal ran-confonaing lot; and ~i «~7 1 ~ v PLANNING COMMISSIn" RESOLUTION N0. 89-66 YA89-04 - COIMERC .CARRIERS May 10,.1989 Page 2 (d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.0208 authorizes the Ctty Planner to tapose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Development Review permit approval, including requirements for lard soaping, street improvements, regulation of vehicular irgrcss, egress and traffic circulation, establishaent of development sc hedrles or time limits for per formarce or coapletton; and (e) 14ntc ipal Cade Section 17.06.020A sates Urat the purpose and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to aswre that wch 11m1tad projects comply with all applicable City Standards and Ordinances; ant (f) The site plan submitted 1n con~unctton with the appllcatlon, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan stanched of a 35-foot average landscape setbsk and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as meawrcd from the ultiamta face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain link fence improvements do not meet the Indrstrial Spxlfic Plan standards for screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage with mawnry, concrete or other similar amterials: and (g) The site wrrcntly is improved with far driveways within 820 feet of street frontage. The City's access Dolicy far arterial streets specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced 300 feet apart. Therefore, only two drlverays would be allowed an this site. Further, driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avoid cpeflicting left-turn xovements. The Ctty's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum 100 feet from Intersections. 3, Based upon the wbstantlal evidence Drcsentad to this Coamisston during the above-referenced public nearing ant upon the specrrtc rrnatngs or facts set forth to paragrephs 1 and 2 above, this Comatsston hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal intarpretatian and enfoecement of the speclHed regulation would not rewlt 1n prectlcal difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship Inconsistent with the ob,iectlves of the Da~elopment Cade. (b1 1haC Mrere are not exceptional or extreordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the DroDKtY involved or to the lntenced use of the properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal intarpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation world not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties 1n the same disirlct. ~~ PLANNI N6 COMMISSIOA .SOLUTION N0. 84-fib VA89-Oa -.COMMERCIAL CARRIERS 14y 30, 1989 Page 3 ' (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the 7mlcati ores on other propert/es classified in the sane district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will De detrimental to the publle health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vi clnity. 4. Based upon the findings and conciusions seL forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Cowaission hereby denies the application suD,lect to each and every condition set forth Del ow. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF PWY 1989. PLANNI/~ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA!IONBA JJ~~ 1 r BY: /./.C~ ~.Ll C.F' ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coawisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cert/fy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Caasslsslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular eeeting of She Planning Caewisslon held on the 10th day of Mqy 189, by the foltowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSiOMERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 9~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REYIEII N0. 87- 71, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAW INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAILING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-143-07, 08, 09 A. Recitals. (i) Commercial Carriers has filed an application for the approval of Minor Development Review No. 87-71 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter fn this Resolution, the sub,{ect Development Review request is referred to as "the application". (ti) On the of 26th of April 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting an the application and continued said meeting to May 10, 1989. (111) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 T~i~ ~...wlt ~1 _w I~w.aF~ a nNF/rally i1nAe tF of ali n_F *I~n Pa~fe set forth 1n the Recitals, Part A, of tM s Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 26, 1989, and continued tc May 10, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby sDectflcally finds as follows: (a) The application applies to Droperty located at 10807 Jersey Bouievard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth of 673 feet and 1s presently improved with an office, warehouse and parking lot; and (b) The property to the north of the sub,)ett site is multt- tenant industrial park, Lhe Droperty to the south of that site consists of a wareheuse, the property to the east iz racant, and the property to the west is a warehouse; and (c) The application applies to a site that is currently improved with an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is considered a legal non-conforning lot; and 9~ ~jC~~~~T ~~ N PLANNI N6 COMA SSIO' TSOLUTION N0. 89-67 MDR 87-71 - COlMERL.nI CARRIERS Nay 10, 1989 Page 2 (d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.0208 authari zes the Cf ty Planner to impose reasonable condl ti ons upon a Minor Devel apment Review permit approval, including requirements for landscapT ng, street improvements, regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and (e) Ffuni ci pa) Code Section 17.06.020.8 states that the purpose and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and Ordinances; and (f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the application, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot average landscape setback and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as measured from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain link fence improvements do not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage with masonry, concrete or other similar materials; and (g) The site currently Ts improved with four driveways within 820 feet of street frontage. The City's access policy for arterial streets specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced no less than 300 feet apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this site. Further, driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left-turn movements. The City's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum iuu ieei rnrm inixrae~. Li mra. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissfon during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrzphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General P1 an; and (b) That the proposed use Ts not in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use 1s not in compliance with each of the dppiicabie provisions of the Development Cade; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurlou~ to proDerLles or improvements in the vicinity. Q. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. g8 PLANNIN6 COMMI SSIO :SOLUTION ND. 89-a7 Mq! 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CASIRIERS Mey 10, 1989 Page 3 S, The Secretary to this Cossai ssi on shall certify to the adoption of Lhis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS LOTH DAY OF MIIY 1989. PLANNING CC+eIi SS SON OF THE LITY OF AANL HO CUCAMONGA 8Y: I, Brad Buller, Sec rotary of the Planning Coasd sslen of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Cawalsslon of the City of Rancho Cucaapnga, at a regular eeeting of the Plants ng Caasaisslon held on the 10th day of Msy, 1989, by the fo11w1ng vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHI TI EA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE g~ .«... 9:05 o,M. -Planning Commission Recessed 9:25 P.M. -Planning Commission Reconvened + . r . « F. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVI Ew 87-71 - CONMERC IA. CARRIERS - A request to grade an pave approx na y acres o a or an ex sting site within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9j, iota Led on the south side of Jersey Beul eva rd, between Utica and Vincent Avenues -APN: 209- 143-0), OB d 09. G. VARIAIICE 89-04 - COMR171G IAL CAB0.d alS - A request to reduce the parking se ac rom ee o ee a . iandscape setback from 35 feet to 8 feet for 12 acres of land in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Vincent Avenues -APN: 209-143-07, 08 d 09, Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner presented the staff report and picbrres showing existing conditions along the frontage of the property, Grans Becklund, Gabel, Cook 6 0eckluM, staled they were in agreement with the conditions and he was available to answer questions. Chairman MtN1e1 asked if the landscaping in front of the east 6uildirg was largely dirt with groundcover thet has not filled in as yet. Mr. Becklund conf Trmed that it was. James Barton, 10535 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cuwnonga, salted he was the owner of the development on Jersey Boulevard north of the subject property. He stated he had invested =22,000,000 fn his projectand the Lity had required he stay within the landscaping guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan, He stated that when driving down Red Oak m the project site, there is currently no laMscapirg and only sparse laMscaping was being proposed. He believed the Planning Commission made a proper decision when they initially required public right-of-wAy landscaping. He felt it would De unfair to glue the applicant a variance from the City standards. He complained that the e~layees of the project site were using the eaployee plaza and patio in his development. He frlt the project proponent would be nnaktng money off the inproveinents bxause of increased usage and should be required to perform the landscaping. He felt the project site was an eyesore and the Ctty should grasp the opportunttp to require proper landscaping. Dave Nadley, 10700 Jersey Boulevard, M400, Rancho Cuwnpnga, staled he was a tenant in Jersey Buslress Park. He said he had moved 1n to July 1988 and his office was directly adjacent to the entry of the Commercial Carrier conpiex, He stated chat when he first leased his space he had reservations because he Planning Commission MT notes -11- gprTl 26, 1989 ~ ~ ~~r~~, felt the souM side of Jersey looked like an industrial ghetto, but he had seen the quality of development in Rancho Cucamonga aM felt the area would be improved. He felt the paving represented a mtfor expansion to the Commercial Carrier facility and that rare traffic would be generated. He complained of loitering in the evening hours, which he felt was caused Dy employees or visitors to the Commercial Carriers site. He sated Commercial Carrier's metal buildings were not attractive and he felt the 25 foot landscaped seMack was not unreasonable. Mr. Becklund stated no future development would De taking place on the site aril that the lot had been paved a year ago as a dust control measure. He stated Mere was no change in the use or additional construction to take place, except for Mole requirements contained in the Resolution. Commissioner Ch itiea asked if any trees were planted when Me site was paved. Mr. Becklund stated ;t was not a parking lot, but a vehicle storage area and no aesthetic improvements had been made. He stated Me area vas covered wTt'n 1/2" gravel mined wiM emulsion, giving Me appearance of a gravel yard. Mr. Barton salted Mat nothing had been done where Red Oek terminates. Loyd Shockley, Maintenance Supervisor for gyder Tricks, stated Mat people loitered in front of his property, but they were not his employees and Mat he had spent a lot of money and time cleaning up the site when he originally bought the property. He said Mey were originally told by City staff that MGy would not be required to make arbr lmprwements and Mat wrfatlrg wiM a macadam rock coating would arty require a gnding and Raving plan. Commissioner Chitiea asked Me condition of Me street, and why Me applicant w,,n /I lit hPPa ack ed reoalr 1t. 8111 Silva, Deputy Ctty Engineer, stated Mat ma,ior street improvements are required for full redeveloprent or new development, but not normally for a Minor Development Review. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Chairman MtN1e1 felt the Planning Commission had performed an acceptable ,lab when the protect was first reviewed. Me did not think modification of the conditions and granting of the Variance ras to Me best interest of Me community. He felt it wes approDrtate to require upgreding of the property with Me appllcatton for the Minor Development Review. Mr. Kroutfl stated Mat City Council felt Mere should De amore realistic relation shto between on-site vs. off-site imgroveaents. ThC had questioned what triggered the requirements for improvements. It was felt Mat Meoretically Me applicant could go back aM remove the macadam coat and no improvements could be required. Therefore, City Council felt it might be better to redece Me amount of improvements regained. Planning Commission Minutes / -12/- April 26, 1989 /~1 Commissioner Chit Tea asked if the site would met the County requirements for dust control if the coating were removed. Mr. Krou til stated it would then bec oim a code enforcement issue, because storing of trucks could require screening and the City would have the legal means to make them remove the vehicles. Commissioner Finer ick wanted to knav if a Development Review would 6e required to remove the macadam coat. Mr. Kroutil stated the macadam coating was applied subject to conditions. If the conditions were not met, the approval would be void, Fie felt City Council returred the matter Dec au se they felt the City would get nothing if the Variance was not gran Led. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that if the applicant paved the area as a parking lot, that would require a permit and it would trigger the need for landscaping. Mr. Krou til stated that had the Planning Commission determined that the macadam coating was not a fora a paving, the Minor Development Review would mat have been required and no condlt ions could have been placed an the site. Commissioner Emerick stated the Commission needed to determine 1f the macadam coating should be cansideretl paving. Chairman mYNiel stated the macadam coating was put down to control dust. lie felt that as the requirements did not Include undergrandTng, they were not a major burden. Ile felt the improvements were not significant and he wandered why Ryder wns opposed to improvements. Commissioner Ch it tea felt people on the aa,7o tntng properties and riwse peuy ie traveling down Red Oak had to view the site aM it was an gyesore. She Pelt that the conditions originally imposed were at the minimal side of what is normally asked of other property owners. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed that the original conditions were consistent with what 1s asked of other property owners. Commissioner Fmerick felt that the original conditions were correct. Chairman McN1e1 felt that the dust generated before the macadam coating was more of a nuisance to Ryder Trucks than to surrounding property owners. He reopened the public hearing far comment from Mr. Becklund. Mr. AeckluM stated that the original conditions required moving the office parking lac and a toss of approximately 2 acres of storage to relocaPe the parking lot. Chairman Mc Niel stated ffiat landscaping generally runs lOS - 15S of a total project. Planning Commission Minutes -13- April 26, 1989 D o~- Mr. Becklund staled they would be agreeable to that percentage tf they were proposing a brand new development. However, he felt this as this was not a new development, maJor landscaping should not be required. Hearing no further testingry, the public hearing was closed, Brad Butter, City Planner, stated that the applicant originally appealed staff's conditions on a Minor Development Review application. The Planning Commission upheld staff's Condit loos and Lhe applicant appea led to City Council. City Council determined the applicant should resubmit the matter to the Planning Commission and request a Variance. fie applicant then resubmitted, based oo the direction he heard from Lity Cau ncil. The Planning Commission should now consider the City Courcil direction and take action on the application. Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Chitiea, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for Yarfance 89-04. Motion carried by the following vote AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIFl, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY -carried Mr. Buller asked if the Corwissioners wished to reconsider their position on any of the original conditions regarding the level of iogrovement. It was the consensus of the Planning Connalssion that they would request ingrovements consistent with what they had dog previously. Chairman McN1e1 stated he would De wtllrng to aiscuss puaaiuie murl~y of driveway locations, and he would possibly be willing to leave the driveways where they were currently proposed. Ralph Hanson, City Attorney, salted that the ResDtu4lon for the Minor Development Review required a Variance, which the Conaatssion had voted to deny. Therefore, the Minor Development Review could oat be approved. Motion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Chitiea, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for Ninon Development Review 87-71, Motion Carried by the following vote: AYfS: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIQ, TOLSfOY NOES: CpMISSI0NER5: NONE ABSENT: CCMMiSSIONERS: BLAKESLEY -carried R * * * * Planning Commission Minutes -14- Apr11 26, 1988 /03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 26, 1989 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MINOR DEYELOPMENT REVIEN 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS - A reques o gra a an pave approx ma y acres o and for an existing site within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and W ncent Avenues - APN: 209-143- 07, 08 6 09. YARIANCE 89-04 - CgMERCIAL CARRIERS - A request to reduce e pa ng se ac rom ee q feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to 8 feet for 12 acres of land in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Wncent Avenues - APN: 209-143-07, 08 8 09. i. ABSTRACT: At the City Council meeting of February 1, 1989, the oun nied an appeal of the Conditions of Approval for Minor Development Review 87-71. The City Council, however, felt that grvnp .axpf fm~ .yo r,,..wiri,,s ~a a"~.,.,,.1 w__ „ _~•ie~~ In reviewing the applicant's appeal, the Council directed the applicant and staff to prepare a reasonable improvement plan. A modified improvement plan was prepared and reviewed by the City Council, which would require a variance. The Council therefore dented the appeal request and directed the applicant to submit a variance request to be heard by the Punning Commission (see Exhibit "A") . II. BACKGROUND: On November 19, 1987, the applicant filed Minor evlT~opnient Review 87-71 requesting to grade and pave approximately 12 acres of land for an existing legal non- conforming lot. The applicant proposes to pave the existing site, which is utilized for truck parking and storage. On July 7, 1988, the City Planner reviewed and apprryved Minor Development Review 87-71 sub,iect to conditions that would bring the site into conformance with the Development Code and Industrial Specific Plan. [~ PLANNING COIMISSION STAFF REPORT Mpt 87-71, VA 89-04 - COMERCIAL CARRIERS April 26, 1989 Page 2 On July 18, 1988, the applicant requested that all of the Conditions of Approval be appealed to the Planning Commission. On October 26, 1988, the Planning Commission approved modified Conditions of Approval for Minor Development Review 87-71, by this action, the appeal request was effectively denied in part. On November 4, 1988, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. III. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: On February 1, 1989, the Ctty Council rev ewe~i~ia mo ied-improvement plan. The proposal was to improve a substantial portion of the frontage, to eliminate one driveway, to relocate and reconstruct another, and to provide a decorative screen wall, with landscaping behind the setback line. The specific proposal 15 outlined belay and qn Exhibit "B": 1. Driveway "A" will be removed. 2. Driveway "B" will be relocated to align with the driveway across the street and reconstructed to City standards. 3. A11 improvements (i.e., landscaping, decorative screen u"/1 eMoet 11 nhFC e1 .MralY ",111 ha rnnetnviM between the west property line and Driveway "B". Driveways "1" and "2" will be remain in their existing locations. 4. Driveway "2" will be signed "Right Turn Only". 5. The existing parking between Driveway "B" and Ortveway "2" will remain. 6. Behind the parking row, beWeen Driveway "B" and Driveway "1", a 5-foot landscape planter and decorative screen wall will be incorporated. The above improvements would require a variance to reduce the landscape and parking setbacks in order for the parking areas to remain within the setback area east of Driveway "B". The variance request was submitted on March 17, 1989 (see Exhibit "C"1. ~ ~ ~.) PLANNING CCNMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR 87-71, VA 89-04 - COINERCIAL CARRIERS April 26, 1989 Page 3 IY. ANALYSIS: This proposal would result in the development of full mpro ements on approximately 403 of the property frontage. The proposed decorative wall, with landscaping, would screen the storage area from public view along Lhe entire frontage, as required by the Industrial Specific Plan. In addition, one problem driveway would be eliminated, and another relocated to a more desirable location. The two easterly driveways and the existing parking between them would remain unchanged. The modified proposal, as presented, is consistent with the Council's direction. The proposal would result in significant improvements to a substantial portion of the site. It is assumed that any future expansion or alterations requiring permits would trigger the requirement to bring the rest of the site up to current Development Standards. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Comnisston must make ail of the following n ngfi- sdi~or~fo approve this application: 1. fiat strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical diffinAty nr unnorweea rv nhvei raj hardehin inrnneie tent with the ob,tectlves of the OeVelopment Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conAitions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not comply generally to other properties 1n the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties to the same district. 4. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of a special privilege Inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified 1n the same district. 5. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially in,~urlous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. rod PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPoRT MDR 87-71, YA 89-04 -COMMERCIAL CARRIERS April 26, 1989 Page 4 VI. CORRESPON3ENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a e rt newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent proper y owners within 300 feet of the protect. VII. RECOlMEN)ATION: If the Planning Coawission can support the Facts or ngs, then approval, by seperate actions, of Minor elap nt Review 87-71 an6 Variance 89-04 through the adoption o the ttached Resolutions of Approval and Standard Conditions w ld appropriate. City :ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" -City Council Minutes, February 1, 1989 Exhibit "B" - Ieprovenent Plan Exhibit "C" -Letter frowt Applicant Resolution of Approval -MDR 87-71 with Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval - YA 89-04 1~7 City Council Minutes Feb[uary 1, 1989 Pegs 6 Pl. NLNOR DEVQ~PI®f AEVIEN E7-71 - COIOmICI11L CASE/. IMC. ~ An appeal of the Condit lone of approval for tae grtdlnq and paving of approximately 12 acme of land for outdoor storage within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 9) locntad on the south eider of Jersey Boulevard between Utica and Vincent Avenues. Coatieued frw January 18, 1989. Staff report presented 6y Brad Suller, CSLy Planner. Councilman Alexander inquired it the Pira OSetiict had been involved in this. Brad Buller, City Planner, reepondeC they had not, but etaPf would run this 6y them. Mayor Stout opened the meeting fot public hearing. Thera being no response, the public hearing uas closed. ~ RESOLUTION NO. BB-704 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCID OP TtR CITY OP RANCHO CllCAHONGA, CALIPOANIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OP MINOR DBVELOPMYNT REVIEN NO. 57-71 LOGTED AT IOB07 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT )SOBAREA 9) O! TAB INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND HARING PINDINOS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTIONt Moved Dy Alexander, seconded by Wright to deny the appeal for Minor Development 87-71, and direct e[eff and epplicent to proceW to the Planning Commission for review of the variance. Mayor Stoui et nt ed Chet Lt shoo ld be noted Chet Council has rev iswad th1s~ and ale hough not Legally making a finding, there wee a general coneeneu• twat this , compromise were acceptable. Motion carried unanlawusly, 5-O. ~ • • ~ G1. THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAIN6 AREA MASTER PLAN OP DRAINAGE REPORT - To approve and adopt the 6tlwanda/San Sevalne Area Master Plan of Drainage Report. Statf report presented ty Halter St ieknay, Aeaoeiate Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meat inq for publlc aeacinq. There Winq no public response, the publlc hearing uas closed. O~ ~H)n~11 „Ae ~a At°~ -~~~ ~d ~? II \~ ~ YAA W 3a I ~~ ~ ~L 7 J d ~ ; ~ ,~ ~f ~°° o ~~ ,, 'a ~/ V r~~ J / ~ V i ~ ' / ~ V' i 1 / ~ J I 1 I ~~ 3 ~~ o~~ ~e .1 ~~ ~, ~~~ ~Y 1 --'_~' • - T 0 ~ ~ I ~ 9 H ~ ~-~< ~ ~ U ~ v'f ~l 1 :~! S M a7 ~ ~ E., '~ V 0 ~~ V ;~ Vq ~' ~ z ~zz V fx 17 March 1989 ~,. _ OK S BED m LUND Civil Engineering a Surveying • Structures • Environmental • Planning city of Aancha Cucamonga P.O. Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Ma. Cynthia Kinser -- Planning Dopartment Re: Variance Aequeat Yor Hinor Development Aeviex 87-71 Dear Ms. Kinser: In conjunction xith Minor Development Aeviex ,87-71, xe respectfully request varie¢cea in the folloxiag ereea: 1. Street Setback Hequiremeata 2. Lendacaping Hequirema¢ta The justification for these vnriancea ie that the many iagrovemente required by the Industrial Specific Plm xould not he in line with the type of minor construction proposed, ie. that of coating the parting _ ..~ i. t,. ..>,.w nP ,.. r,unwi nn n4 facilitiee.+yHoxever, •after comultetion rith the Planning Depart•ent staff, ve have proposed a eubets¢tial upgrade of the existing site conditions as outlined in the City Council Staff Heport 1lDH 87-71 dated February 1, 1989. These improvemeate rill upgrade the site to e condition superior to the the present condition. This comtrnction x111 go a long vay toxerd meeting the intent of the Industrial SpecifSC Plea requirements, hoxever varie¢ces tram those requirements era still necessary. For the above reenom xe raepectfally request that the Cit7 consider approving this variance regveat. Enclosed ie the variance fee of 5272.00. Should yon have aqy queatioas or require additional iaforeation, please do net hesitate to cell. Respectfully, Cabal, Cock d Hecklund, Inc. ~nGat:ip~~~6~r.C~/ Grant Becklund civil Engineer Enclosure R~ EL, CO 1l0 647 North Main Street, Suite 1-B, Riverside, Calif. 92501 ~ItC~T „C„ Telephone (714) 788-8092 ----- CITY OF RANCHO CL"CAytONGA STAFF REPORT ,-~ ~- .~-; DATE: June 21, 1989 .<T51'~' T `~~ TD: City Council and City Manager I ! FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Amendment to Ti tie 12 of the Municipal Code allowing ~~~ private street designation and exemption from street dedication and construction requirements RECDMMEMQJITiDN: It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and introduce the ordinances relative to the designation of private streets as approved by resolution. Background/Analysis The requirements of the Municipal Code regardtng dedication and/or improvement of streets consistent with City standards (Title 12) continue to be a source of irritation with property owners proposing to build or remodel stngle-family residences on older private streets within the community. The most recent situation regarding the dedication and {mnrnvnmanf of •heC_ ~w ~.~~w S.~.c .i JCCw ,eJ un oel la ~15La Ur7Ve. In some cases the property owners on private streets want the street improvements constructed and the street improved to City standards. In other cases, the property owners are opposed to dedicating the necessary right-of-way and/or to guarantee construction of the necessary street improvements. Sometimes these opposite cases occur on the same private street. Street improvements, inciuding curb and gutter, street iighting, etc., are required by the Development Code sections of the Municipal Code to provide a pleasing environment, to protect properties in resldentlal districts and for the health and safety of persons 1n those residential areas. However, the Development Code (Title 17) also provides for street standards on private streets' as approved by the Planning Commission and based upon gpeclfic criteria. However, this desfgnation of "private street" does not apply to individual single-family restdentlal unit construction or remodeling. CCSR JUNE 21, 1989 PAGE 2 To eliminate the con tTnuing conflicts between property owners interested in building or remodeling residential dwellings on private streets, the City Attorney has prepared an ordinance which would amend Lhe Municipal Code to alloy for the designation of certain streets as private streets. The ordinance provides a public hearing process whereby property owners on streets proposed to be designated as "private streets" would have an opportunity to express their opinion regarding the maintaining of a private street desf gnat{ on, and exempting these private streets from the Municipal Code requirements for dedication and construction of Dublic improvements. Respectfully sohmitted, r ~ . RHM:N~Ssd Attachment 1 d ORDINANCE N0. a A~ C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING SECTION 12.06.055 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN EXEMPTION FOR PRIVATE STREETS FROM STREET DEDICATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Chapter 12.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 12,08.055, to be read, in words and figures, as follows: "12.08.055 Construction of ublic i r_o_ve~ments~ - Ex~e~m~ti~on ~~e stream. a prov s on~T s of Chapter 12.08 snot app~to pr v~residential streets as follows: "(1) Those private rest denttal streets permitted to be established by the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to Subdivision Ordinance and/or Development Code procedures; and/or UCVCIVp111C11L I.UVC ~1I ULCUUI CJ, uUV "(2) Those private residential streets which have been specifically exempted by resolution of the City Council. "D, Ex~~em L~~io~~n of ~riva~te streets - Procedure. The City Council, upon tie filing of an Appl cat on Pet- tfTn and following a noticed public hearing, may adopt a resolution designating a private residential street, or a portion thereof, exempt from the provisions of Chapter 12.08. "(1) Definitions: "(a) 'Private Residential Street' shall mean a private street in a residential area established as private, or for hhich offers ^f dedf cats on were not requested, pursuant to the pre-incorporationVSan Bernardino County subdivision/development procedures. "(b) 'Application Petition' shall mean a petition bearing the names and addresses of property owners representing, at minimum, sixty percent (60%) of the properties fronting on the private residential street proposed for exemption. The Application Petition shall contain, or have /~31 attached thereto: the name of the street and description (in words or by map depiction) of that portion of the private residential street proposed for exemption; a map depicting the street addresses and approxtmate locations of those property owners signing the application petition; and, a vicinity map showing the approximate location of the private residential street in relation to existing surrounding streets to a distance of approximately one-half mile. "(2) Procedures - Notice and hearing. The Application Petition shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga together with payment of appropriate fees. Upon receipt of the Application Petition, the City Clerk shall schedule the matter fora public hearing before the City Council occurring at a regular meeting no later than sixty (60) days following the filing of the Application Petition. Notice of the public hearing shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.02.110 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. "(3) Requirements: "(a) The traffic flaw on the private residential street shall consist primarily of the ingress and egress of the residents along such street and their guests, without customary usage by non-residents as a route of passage; "(b) The proposed private residential street tc~ao~t nT iii iiu dims tid,i twu I~l uTitTiiy u/ yi JyuSc u' public streets; and "(c) Sufficient off-site and on-site parking, in conformity with the requirements of the Development Code, shall be provided. "(4) Findings. The Ctty Council shall approve the private residential street exemption request if, based upon substantial evidence presented at the public hearing, the Council finds all of the following: "(a) The private residential street is in conformity with the General Plan; "(b) The priva*.e residential street meets al} of the requirements set forth in this Section; and "(c) The exemption of the private residential street will not adversely affect the health, safety or welfare cf those persons and properties adJacent to, and Tn the vicinity of, such street. /~~ 2 "(5) Vacation. In the event one or more offers of dedication have prev out sTy~een accepted on the proposed private residential street, no resolution adopted pursuant to the terms and provtstons of this section shall be effective until all such dedicated property is vacated and abandoned and such abandoned right-of-way Ts sold to, and accepted 6y the owners of those properties which originally offered such dedication. For the purpose of this section, Lhe sale price of such abandoned and excess right-of-way will be one dollar {f1.00) plus all costs of transfer. "(6) Condi Lions. In adapting any such resolution, the City Council may mp- oT se any reasonable conditions deemed necessary by the City Engineer to protect the health, welfare and safety of those persons and properties in and around the private residential street. "(7) Fees. The City Council may, by resolution, establish a fee to recover the costs involved in the review and processing of the Application Petition. Section 2: The City Council declares that, shouid any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent Jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain 1n full force and effect. .~iK tiul r The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be pu611shed within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in Th___e_ D~ailyy Ry~e or~~t, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntarD~fornia, and circulated in the CTjy of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED ;nd ADOPTED this day of 1989. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~~' 3 / V r~~ • "(5) Vacation. In the event one or more offers of dedication have prev oui-Tbeen accepted on the proposed private residential street, no resolution adopted pursuant to the terms and prcvi si ons of this section shall be effective until all such dedicated property is vacated and abandoned and such abandoned right-of-way is sold to, and accepted by the owners of those properties which ort gi pally offered such dedication. For the purpose of this section, the sale price of such abandoned and excess right-of-way x111Jbe one 9ollar (f1y00) plus gll costs of ~ transfer,, o+-~.-~--T ~ ~ ~ ~ "(6) Condltl ons. In adopting any such resolution, Csa-rf the y Counc7l may mpTose any reasonable condid ons deemed ~„b . necessary by the City Engineer to protect the health, welfare and safety of those persons and properties 1n and around the private residential street. "(7) Fees. The City Council may, by resolution, establish a fee to recover the costs involved in the review and processing of the Appiicatian Petition. Section 2: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or deciared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent ,lurtsdictlon, or by reason • of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain 1n full force and effect. Section 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Clty Clerk shalt cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The DaTI Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar o, a orn1a, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1989. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: HOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: l ~~ cu-... G~ 3 ATTEST: • every uthe et, ty e I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californ ta, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was given a first reading at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1989; a puDiic hearing was held on the dam , T98~and was finally passed at a regular meet n~f the CTty ou~n~f the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1989. Executed this day of 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every u e e e LJ r~c~ • ATTEST: every ut a et, ty e I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was given a first reading at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held or. the ddy of 1989; a public hearing was held on the ad y~~ X89-and was finally passed at a regular meetings the City ounc o the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1989. Executed this day of 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. every ut a et, ty er ~I w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 0.SSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - N H U N - Var ous amen ments to t o the ubdi vi lion rd nance, regarding appeal periods, approval periods, and extensions. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed ame~ment to the Subdivision OrEinante. II. ABSTRACT: This report presents certain changes to the Subdivision ~Srd nl ance to make the map process consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act and the process for all other entitlements (i.e. - CUP's, Development Reviews). The specific changes are explained fully in the attached Planning Commission staff report. Res y ed Br r City P1 nner BB:DC:mlg Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report Minutes of May 10, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting Ordinance 117 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 10, 1989 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner ,i` GUGMp,~ 9 ~ r. C n I j~~ P L r0 z _ 7 19" ~ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CITY - r ous amen ens o e e u v s on r nonce, regarding appeal periods, approval periods, and extensions. ABSTRACT: This report presents certain changes to the Subdivision r nonce to make the map process consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act and the process for all other entitlements (i.e. - CUP's, Development Reviews). Ii. BACKGROUND: Appppeals: The Sub division Ordinance currently provides for a (15) day period to file an appeal of the Planning Commission's action regarding a tentative tract or parcel appeal shall be filed within 10 days after the action is taken by the Planning Commission. Further, the City's Development Code establishes a 10-day appeal period for all other entitlements, such as Conditional Use Permits and Development Reviews. Since a pro,i ect may have both a Tract Map and a Design Review, it would sem logical to allow for a consistent appeal period. 8. Apppprovals: fie Subdivision Ordinance states that the approval oT~enfatlve tract map or parcel map shall expire 18 months from the date of the Planning Commission's approval. Section 66452.6 of the State Map Act establishes that tentative maps shall expire 24 months after approval. Again, the City's Development Code establishes a 24-month approval period far Conditienal Use Pernits and Development Reviews. The proposed amendment would provide for a consistent 24-month approval period. C. Extensions: The approval period may be extended by the anFt~ng commission upon request by the developer. The Subdivision Ordinance currentiy allows a maximum extension of 24 months. The State Map Act, Section 66452.6, aitows for up PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT May 10, 1989 Page 2 to 36 months of extension. Staff is recommmending that the City's Subdivision Ordinance be amended to allow up to 36 months of extension. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental ec s an oun no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this pro3ect. If the Conmission concurs with these findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. SV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission as o~ched Resolution recommending approval to the City Council. Resp 1y s d, Brad er City P1 nner BB:DC:ko AttaMments: Resolution Ordinance III mnissioner Tolstoy agreed and felt that condition I was flexible enagh to al w the applicant to place the lot line where he wished. Comniss oner Chitlea stated she would be uncomfortable approving the parcel map with t cmdition 7. Chairman Mc 1 reopered the public hearing m allow Mr, Hix to comment. Mr. HTx asked h he could get the 30 feet back after the parcel map vas recorded. He wg sted that another condition be added U/ 8110N fora lot line adjustnent in future by merely buying the land from the sellers if the map were recorded for to acceptance of the master plan, Ralph Hanson, Deputy City thrrney felt there was no need to add a condition to the Resolution. Chairman Mc Niel felt that m' ute action would adequately protect the applicant. Nearing no further testimony, the pub 'c hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, secmded by 8iakesley, to adopt the Resoluticn approving Environmental Assessment and ntative Parcel Map 12218, with modification to charge the APN to 202-061-3 and 39. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERiFK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE A&SENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -ca .. ,r: + \ K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MUNICIPAL CCOE AMENDMENT - ~wwvvnun - ranuus one runencs w ncie io, me auoarvrsron uratnance, raga rg appeal periods, approval periods, and extensions. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, pre seated the staff report. He indicated that the amendnent was brought before the Planning Commission to allow their conments. He requested minute action only. Chairman Mc Niel asked 1f it was legal to allow only 24 months instead of 36 months for an extension. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that ft wou1A be illegal to allow 1?ss than ±he s+a to requirerrent. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated staff had been allowing the Map Act to govern. Planning Commission Minutes -6- May 10, 1989 ~~v Comalssioner Chitiea stated that the 15-ddy appeal periods for tentative tract or parcel map actions would be permissible because it was longer than the stale-mandated 10-day period. Mr. Coleman stated that appeal periods for all other types of action were 30 days and he felt it was confusing to the public to have two different appeal periods. Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing net closed. Commissioner Cbitiea felt it would be appropriate to bring the Municipal Code into conformance with the state law on all three items. She felt the 10-d ay appeal period was a reasonable amount of time to file an appeal. The Planning Commission unanimously supported the changes as recommended by staff. *+•~. L. ~ME OCCUPATION PERMIT 89-185 - DOUW -Arc appeal of staff's decision to a ome ccupat on erm r a multi-track recording studio located in a Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 9292 row Route - APN: 208-361-19. Cynthia Ktnse Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel 1 ited public comment. Mike Golan, 9292 Arro Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they were willing to lower the nunber of cut mars to a maxtmum of one per day, which would be less than the average for re dances where piano ar swimming were taught. He showed pictures of the s dproofing ire terial on his walls aM stated his studio speakers would not ach the maximum level of 110 decibels (d8) referred to in the staff repor He stated he had modified his speakers to reach the 110 dB and then taken ibel readings right outside his door and from several other areas up to th edge of his property line. He showed charts, which indicated a reading of d8 immediately outside his door down to below 60 d8 at the fence. He p nted a letter from his neighbor indicating he had done the sound level adings in the preserce of his neighbor and a statement that the neTghbo felt the equipment posed no disturbance problem for the neighborhood. Ccmmisstoner Chfttea asked how Mr, Dolan could reco groups with a limit cf one customer per day. Mr. Golan stated he could record the menbers individually various tracts, or could record the vocal at another location, aM then mix the tout tracts in his studio. Planning Commission Minutes -7-/ May 10, 1989 /~( ORDINANCE N0. ~~- C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Section Ifi,16.130 of Chapter 16.16 is amended to read as follows: "16.16.130 Appeals--By Subdivider. If the subdivider disagrees with any ac on y e ann ng amm ssion with respect to the tentative subdivision map, he may, within ten days of such decision file an appeal with the City Clerk. The Council shall consider the appeal within thirty days unless the subdivider consents to a continuance. This appeal shall be a hearing with notice to the subdivider and the Planning Caaaaission, and upon conclusion of the hearing, the Council shall, within ten. days, declare its findings. The Council may sustain, modify, reject or overrule any recomaendations or rulings of the Planning Commission and may make such findings as are not inconsistent with the provisions of this title or the State Subdivision Map Act." SECTION 2: Section 16.16.140 of Chapter 16.16 is amended to read as follows: -d " - ---ws - ,.,... Count nor ~~ y s au oryanq n eres~e person affected DyVa V ~~ decision of the Planning Commission, may file a complaint with the City Council concerning such decision. Any such complaint shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten days after the action which Ts the subJect of the complaint. No complaint shall be considered after the ten-day period. The City Council shalt set the matter for hearing. The hearing shall be held within thirty ddys after the fl ling of the complaint pursuant to the procedures contained in Section 16.16.130, with additional notice being given to the affected interested persons. B. Upon conclusion of the hearing, Lhe City Council shall, within ten days, declare its findings based upon the testimony and documents produced before it. It may sustain, modify, re,~ect or overrule any recommendations ar rulings of the Planning Commission and may make such findings as are not inconsistent with the provisions of this title." / d~ C]TY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. RE: TITLE 16 AMENDMENT Page 2 SECTION 3: Section 16.16.150 of Chapter 16.16 is amended to read as foil ws "16.16.150 Appeal--For General P1 an and Specific Pian Conformity. Any-fn ei; res a person may appea any ec s on of t e ah PT nn n~- Commission relative to conformity to the General Plan or any Specific Plan of the City to the City Council within ten days of approval or conditional approval. Such appeal and hearing thereon shall be in accordance with Section 16.16.L3D," SECTION 4: Section 16.16.160, Subsection A, of Chapter 16.16 is amended to rea as ollaws: "16.16.160 Ex iratton. A. The approval or conditional approval of a ~U ve su v s on map shall expire twenty-four months from the date of the adoption of the resolution by the Planning Commission approving or conditionally approving the map. M extension to the expiration date may be approved as provided in Section 16.16.170(8)." SECTION 5: Section 16.16.170, Subsection C, of Chapter 16.16 is amended to re~a as follavs: "Time Limit of Extension. C. Extensions mAY be granted for a pe or pe no exceeding a total of tAree years.' .,C„T. ....ctloll .,..,.,..C70 c. C` `cr lu.2C is ,.„-,ceded tc .ad a. "/~' fall OWS : "16.20.070 Appeals--By Subdivider. If the subdivider disagrees with any ac on y E e an~PT nTn~ission with respect to the tentative map, he may, within ten days of the receipt of such decision, appeal such action to the City Council in accordance with Section 16.16.130." SECTION 1: Section 16.20.080 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read as follows: "16.20.080 Appeais--By Interested Persons Adversely Affected. Any in eres a persona erse y a ec a y a ec s on o e anning Commission with respect to the tentative parcel map may, within ten days of such dectston, file an appeal with Lhe City Clerk in accordance with Section 16.16.140. SECTION 8: Section 16.20.090 of Chapter 16.20 is amended to read as follows: l~3 CITY COUNCIL ORDINNICE N0. RE: TITLE 16 PMENOMENT Page 3 16.20.090 Expiration. The approval or conditional approval of the ~r-a vti a parse. map shall expire twenty-four months from the date of adoption of the resolution by the Piannfng Commisston approving or conditionally approving the map. The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative parcel map shall terminate all proceedings and no parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included within sueh tentative parcel map shall be filed without first processing a new tentative parcel map. SECTION 9: Section 16.20.100, Subsection C, of Chapter 16.20 is amended to rea~as follars: Time Limit of Extension. C. Extensions ~4Y be granted fora period or per no excee ng a total of three years. SECTION 10: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, pa rag~ap~sentence or word of this ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of coagetent Jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legisiation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, ana words of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION il: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance an~siiaTt-cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its adoption at feast once 1n The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the Ctty o r o, an c rculated in tfie City of .__~_ ~.._.r.-_. ~a -CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _~, ,a} DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN _ _ - amen n o e an use e n on o u ng n enance Services" to include small operation contractors which meet certain criteria. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of s n us r a Specific Plan Amendment. Ii. BACKGROUND - On April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission directed s-Eeff"~ prepare an amendment to the Industrial Specific P1 an (ISP) to permit small operation contractors in areas wM ch currently permit Building Maintenance Services uses. Smaii operation contractors are contractors which do not have outdoor storage, da not operate large construction equipment, and typically are self- enRloyea or nave very iew emp ioyees. Curren Liy, Lim i,F wo uul differentiate these types of users from the larger, more construction-oriented contractors which typically have outdoor storage yards. The Commission determined that small operation contractors were similar to uses described under the Building Maintenance Services land use category 1n the ISP and that they could be differentiated from other, larger and more construction-oriented contractors. Thus, on May 24, 1989, the Commission recommended approval of a text amendment to the Building Maintenance Service land use definition. iII. ANALYSIS: Based on the Commission's direction and on the desire to m-TE airs potential Droblems with allowing contractor uses in industrial Park subareas of the iSP, staff Grafted, and the Commission approved of, the following text amendment to the definition of Bull ding Maintenance Services (amended text is shown in bold face): / d CITY COUNCIL SIAFF REPORT Envir. Assess. d ISPA 89-02 -City of Rancho Cucamonga June 21, 1989 Page 2 Building Maintenance Services: Activities typically include, u6~are notTim'il:ed~maintenance and custodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and ,janitorial services. Siall operation contractors may 6e included in this category, provided that the contractor has no outdoor storage of arty reterials or equlpraerrt, no inoperable vehicles or non~otorized trallen, nor arty vehicles in excess of il4' to width or 6,000 pounds in gross weight. This added text is based on figures specified in another area of the Industrial Specific Plan, as well as in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade pertaining to the regulation of parking on public right-of-way and in residential districts within the City. These figures specifying maximum vehicle width and weight appear to be a good separation point between small pick-up trucks (typically used by small contractors) and the larger, more construction oriented vehicles. The added text also prohibits outdoor storage or the use or storage of any inoperable vehicles, non-motorized trailers, and offices, etc. Currently, building maintenance services uses are permitted in 12 of the 17 subareas (Subareas 1, 3, 4, fi, 7, 8, il, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17) of the ISP. However, they are not permitted in the Naven Avenue Overlay District. Hence, small contractors wuuiu ue pmwi LLeJ in Lime i"c ouuai edn, uut iiul, ni ui(ii tiic Haven Avenue corridor. The amendment will provide additional opportunitfes for small contractors, many of which may 6e operating in residential districts as home occupations. Small operation contractors would be attracted to the multi-tenant tndustrial parks Tn these subareas which are geared toward smaller leased spaces. iV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has found no significant impacts on a env ronmen as a result of this proposed text amendment. The Planning Comwission recommends issuance ~f a Negative Declaration. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Industrial ec c an an the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a public hearing. /d CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Envi r. Assess. d ISPA 89-02 -City of Rancho Cucananga June 21, 1989 Page 3 Respe ~ lly su d Bra Bu r City ner BB:BH:ko Attachments: Exhi6lt "A" - Staff Report of May 24, 1989 Exh161t "B' - Planning Lommisslon Minutes of May 24, 1989 Planning Comaission Resotutlon Recommending Approval Draft Ordinance Approving the Proposed NaenBnent /~ r' - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: May 24, 1989 T0: Chairman and Meyers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ', BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Dlanner SU&IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN ame nm: nt to a an use e n on o ur ng Maintenance Services" to include small operation contractors which meet certain criteria. I. BACKGROUND: At its April 12, 1989 meeting, the Planning omm ssron directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) to permit small operation contracors in areas which currently permit building maintenance services uses. The Commission determined that small operation contractors were similar to uses described under the Buildl ng Maintenance Services land use category aM that if they could be differentiated from large operation contractors (which typically have outdoor storage and operate large construction equipment), they should be included under this category. The Building I'q ill {.C llalbe .1t1 YiAea uiCi Ylc W(icilti,J ~1ci uliticv ~- :2 :~ subareas of the Industrial Specific Plan. They are not permitted in the Naven Avenue Overlay District. I1. PNALYSIS: Based on the Commission's direction and on the desire to mitt, ate Dotential proble~rs with allowing contractor uses in Industrial Park Subareas of the Industrial Specific Plan, staff has proposed the following text anerdnKnt to the definition of Building Maintenance Services, with the amended text shown in bold face: Building Maintenance Services: Activities typically include, but are no m ma ntehance and custodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and janitorial services. 9w11 operation ca!trecars may be included in this category, provided that the contractor has no outdoor storage of aqy materials or equipaeM, no inoperable vehicles or noniotorized tretlers, nor any vehicles in excess of 84" 1n width or 6,000 pounds in gross weight. /< EXHBIT A PLANNING CO!MISSIp" STAFF REPORT ISPA 89-02 -CITY RANCHO COCAMONGA May 24, 1989 Page 2 This added text is based on figures specified in another area of the Industrial Specific Plan as well as in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to Lhe regulation of parktng on public right-of-way and in residential districts within the City. These figures specifying maximum vehicle width and weight appear to be a good separation point between small pick-up trucks (typically used by small contractors) and Lhe larger, more construction oriented vehicles. The added text also prohibits outdoor storage or the use or storge of any inoperable vehicles, non-motorized trailers, and offices, etc. III. ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has fount no significant impacts on a env ronmen as a result of this proposed text amendment. If the Comaisslon and City Conch concur, a Negative Declaration should be issued. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project Ts consistent with the Industrial pec c an a the General Plan. The project witl not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Gaily Report newspaper as a Dubiic hearing. YIII. RECUMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Coamission cans e~~le options outlined above and recon~aend approval of Environmental Assessment and Industrial Specific Plan maenament 89-02 to the City Council. Res o ily b Ttte Br lei City tanner BB:BH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Staff Report of April 12, 1989 Exhi6lt "B" -Planning Coa~aisslon Minutes of April 12, 1989 Resolution Recommending Approval Draft Ordinance /4 / CITY OF RANCHO CliCA.'YIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FR01•': BY: April 12, 1989 Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brett Horner, Assistant Planner .J ~~ O r ~9 Q~-~~~ c z __~ U Z 19'" ~ SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN - A request to initiate an amen en o e an use regu ations for Subarea 7. FBSTRACT: The applicant, Mid Valley Management Company, is requ~ing that the Commission initiate an amendment to the Industrial Spetlfic Plan, Subarea 7, to permit building contractor uses. Currently, this use is neither permitted nor conditionally permitted within this subarea, which is designated "industrial Park". Staff is seeking Commission direction on whether to initiate an amendment, and this report 1s not intended to be a comprehensive analysts of the issue. II. ANALYSIS: The ISP currently has two categories for building co~Eor uses, which are defined below: Dina AI ..., rnn~raMnn~e niFMne ,nA V„vle• M+i W fiae yp ca y nc u e a ces an s rage of equipment, materials, and vehicles for contractors who are in the trades irwoiving construction activities which include, but are not limited to, plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services. Screening of outdoor storage is required as per Section IY, A.6. (Storage Area/Screening). Building Contractor's Storage Yard: Activities include e man nonce an outer storage of large construction equipment and outdoor storage of large construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment, cranes, and outdoor storage of building materials in an unscreened manner. The applicant's realest (see Exhibit "A") concerns small operation building contractors, such as plumbers, electricians, carpenters, and similar tradesmen. These contractors typically are self- employed or employ only a few persons, do not utilize heavy equipment, store materials indoor only, and lease a small amount of space (1500 square feet or less). /3d E,ryrBir- I~, PLANNING COMMISSI OI 'AFF REPORT RE: ISP, SUBAREA 7 April 72, 1989 Page 2 The applicant believes this type of use is different from the contractor use described to the ISP. Further, the appii cant states that these smaller operation contractors are very similar to other permitted uses in Subarea 7, such as custom manufacturing, office, light warehousing, business supply retail sales and services, business support services, and building maintenance services, among others. The applicant specifically mentions the building maintenance services use as being similar to that of the small operation building contractor. The ISP defines building maintenance services as follows: Building Maintenance Services: Activities, typically inc u eTd~are nofTi-mTi:ed to: maintenance and custodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and janitorial services, III. ISSUES: Currently, the ISP does not differentiate between u~iTdi-ng contractors which utilize heavy construction equipment and have outdoor storage yards (large operation contractors) and those which do not (small operation contractors). Hence, all contractors fall under one land use category (which may or may not be desirable). Generally, DuTiding contractor uses are not compatible with office, light warehousing, research, and retail uses which architecture, site design, landscaping, etc. Consequently, the ISP excludes building contractor uses from the Haven Avenue Overlay District and from subareas, such as Subarea 7, designated as "Industrial Park". Building contractor uses are permitted or conditionaity permitted in most subareas (see Exhibit "C"). It appears from this exhibit that the ISP provides sufficient area in which to 1 sate building contractor uses, regardless of whether the contractor has an outdoor storage yard or uses heavy Construction equipment. However, if small operation building contractors do not use heavy equipment or store materials 1n outdoor storage yards, Choy may De compatible to subareas which permit such uses as building maintenance services and light manufacturing. In this case, the only area which may be of concern is the vehicle uses by the small operation contractor. Frequently, a small operation contractor will use pick-up trucks to travel and transport small building materials beMeen the office and the job site, (~ r G~H~B/l ;9 ~, PLANNING COMISSIO'~ "TAPE REPORT RE: ISP, SUBAREA April 12, 1989 Page 3 Nawever, some of these trucks may be quite large, weathered, and in disrepair from being on the job site, From an aesthetic standpoint, this would to rd m negatively impact "Industrial Park" zoned areas. Yet these same types of trucks may also be used by janitorial services, ex termt nati ng services, main Lenance/custodial services, and other uses defined in the Building Maintenance Services land use category, which is permitted 1n Subarea 7. IV. OPTIONS: If the Conmission believes that the applicant's requesE has merit, the fallowing actions could be taken: 1. Initiate an ISP amendment to permit or conditionally permit 9uilding Contractor's Offices and Yards in Subarea 7; 2. Establish a new ISP laM use category (through a text ame Mment) def Tning a small operator Dullding contras Wr (a contractor without a storage yard or any heavy construction equlpmentl and permitting or conditionally permitting wch uses in Subarea 7 and/or other subareas as the Commission feels is appropriate; 3. include small operator building contractors in the Building Maintenance Services land use definition by rewording Tts definition through an ISP text amendment; 4, Include ail contractors in the existing lard use definition by amending the text of the ISP aM rewording the laM use title to read: "Building Contractor's Office and/OR Yards"; 5, Not initiate any amendment; or 6. Any other option the Commission may deem desirable. V. RECOIMENOATION: Staff reconaaends that the Planning Comaisston cops er a op /ons listed above and direct staff to Droceed with Lhe desl dicourse of action, if any is desired. RtsPectfp}ly fubmitted, ,~.~ ~,,~ Brad Buller SG~, City Planner BB:BN:ko /3~ Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Request letter Exhibit "B" -Subarea 7 Exhibit "C" -Map of Area Permitting Contractor Uses GXyiBir~" LY/cor~nr,~r~Nr s.ar. s.:vas Clty PLVVing nep[cvm[ c(o Brad Buller P.fl. Bex BO] Rencho tucavonge, G 9V]0 gE: Auendwnt of Indue[iLl Speetf [< PlAn Our Mc. Buller: The A[[w Bueinue Cence[ Se loured lv ev IP-0 land uu z ThL dufgnecian rumen gmeul coneuceare Me ELLl into coo uugo[1ee- Bulldlvg Ceptuc[or'• O(flne and Teide vi[h ecnmed rtouge, and enudieg Gan[[acter'e B[o[µe Ta[d vi[h un¢[oved e[o[vge. The pLwlvg deper[uvt hn [zkm the pwi[ivv tlyc ell pn¢et coo[ncton • ruericnd fv the tP-] toot wen i[ chq how vo ouedoa[ uorye vnd buoy equipvev[ nquirwou. Me vn agwetln0 tlut [he depertuve n- caveldu [h!e poel[iov. The cull pvenl cent Hence vhv lem epvw to wr cunt uke epece o[ 1500 egwre Gu or lvu. They ow ow or [w pickwp tncke Dui vv heavy canrt[ve[SOn equipunt. Thei[ vyuuieve cwelse o[ o[flce u evd ven- M1vvee e[aup. All a ne[rua[SOV w[k m0 uurnl tlelwery fe dove ¢ the Thue cull pvrtvt cavtucnv do va[ lvpac[ on [M Hour evy d1ENnvtly rpm n[br m.A u.....n.A • nr... n. 4.N1A4 a ........ .....~. W vavld lib n 1v1t1vu xhvtwer pmuducu m rvelLDle n w co have ehL u¢er ucoveidewd. Veiy iru19 Youre, vALLLT MAXAGF1m[1' COIQAIR l ~. \--![4 I LuLLng Mvvµ[r cc. Oev40 Le![ Ylt Mi. JM ~nnn ~ LV ~Ol . PPrttl CrvragP JAY~4 9, IA • ,l„1 Nl5[S CITY OF ~--~ ITEE~: SUBAREA 7 OF ~T 70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: REauEST ~,~ PLANNING DIVISION ~ y~B~l,~l,p EXHIBIT: A OIIICOL1TgM Tluonlaul~ A - 1Q0'RO.W. ooea ry~Yryp _. __.__ ~ ~wM. 1W'A.O.M. • W~N• r-I Ylb• ~~'r In• 11.O.M. C]pO Maw IaYI• HAIL !(IMO! •,•~"~ ~ ~p w~ ® ~~I ~~ Vsy N014ISeN M• NN H arM^NIML w Nw11 Y •MINFININI •rP• 'TM WM NIaWn IMT MI M NrrM11 wIL~ IW Y tlM INMINI W TIn lY1COpn oI • Mo 4 rl IlrMlwl N • wMM !M•o wt NW1r1 ••r nlw r+N C!/ M•N•A. CITY OF ~3~ ITEI[: oFAS To RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: su~A PLANNING DIVISIONC,Yyjg~r~~~ E%HIBIT:_~SCALE: ~~~ '~ LOCATION OF COMPLEX .e.t...,re. e~vsee~ warn vw ene C/~~ AMCA t~~CnG VN~ i near r vrf u yr r rvrv rv~r ~.~ /~~ ARE PERIY~TTED OR CppOfTIONALLY PERIiMTTED i land U••' IP OI GI 61 GI I GI IP IP GI ial GI GI ~ IP GI GI HI IP IP USE TYPES Sabana IHO 1 2 8 4 6 8 7 B p 10 tU~12 7GItd 1S 18 17 owl•wro colro-•et•r'• Otfk• a rra • t • t t • • • • • •Ylltllnp Conlr•ctor'• Slora•• yMd • • PERMITTED USE i CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-merketl U••• Not Permittetl ' IP-Industrial Park GI-General Industrial MIiHI-Mlnlmum Impact Haavy Intlu•trlal H C-H a: an A:c. Cvor:ay District HI-Neavy Inouetnal CITY OF ~-3 ~ ITEM: s~AR A 7 oFAS 70 RANCHO CLICAMONGA TITLE: M1AM1 PLANNING DIVISION ~y/~~B/l~~r EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE: ~ ~~ DIIIECTOR'S REPORTS D. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - A request to initiate an amendment to the land use regu at ons or area 7. Brett Norner, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman MCN1e1 inviMd public comaent. David Left, associated with development of Arrow Business Center salted Mid Valley Manageaent CompaAy rtes the property management company which operates the facility for them. Ne provided pictures of facilities leased to Wo small general contractors and one small plumbing contractor. lie stated they had discussed the concept with Brad Buller. Ne said their typical units were 800 feet and all units have office space with some industrial space. He said they do not rent to welders or caDtnetmakers, oecause rneir uses ww iu be nu lay mw dusty. He said their proposed users were generally not on site except for the office staff. He requested that the use be allowed in the zone without a Conditional Use Permit. Jack Corrigan, BCE Development, original master planners of the business park, stated that when the property was orfginally developed, provisions were made to avoid having contractors' storege yards in the area. He stated that when the Arrow Industrial Condoainlums were originally built, small general contractors were allowed and there had never been any problems. Ne felt the modification wes warranted. He felt the management corporation would police any weathered trucks being stored on-site. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the CCARs restrict outdoor storage at Arrow Industrial Condominiums. Mr. Left stated that their leases prohibit outdoor storage. Tnere were no further public comments. Planning Commission Minutes -19- April 12, 1989 /3C~ Commissioner Tolstoy stated he felt the proposed use was acceptable so long as the wording prohlbTLed Wtdoor storage and equipment other than trucks or service vehicles. Chairiren MCMIe1 stated that electrical aM plumbing contractors sometimes brry oid Langendorf panel trucks and haul them to construction sites to stare their equipment. He did not want those types of trucks left at the business centers. Commissioner Tolstoy suggested the wording should exclude that Lype of vehicle. Commissioner 8lakesley asked if parking of a certain duration cWld be prohibited. Commissioner Chitiea asked wino wWld enforce this provision. Commissioner Tolstoy stated an inoperable truck wWld constitute Wtside storage; and if there was no way to make a distinction of the kinds of vehicles that could be parked there, he would be against the Amendment. He felt if there was some way to word the Amendment to restrict the Inoperable panel trucks, he would support the charge. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that City Code already prohibits the storage of lnoperatTve vehicles at Commercial/Industrial sites. Chairman Mc Niel invited Mr. Corrigan to respond. Mr. Corrigan stated that as City Code already prohibits the storage of inoperative vehicles, he felt the property owners wWld do an adequate Job of policing. Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested the Commission cWld direct a moATfication of the definition of building maintenance services and could prohibit overnight parking in contunctian with those uses. Chairman Mc Niel stated that he did not want the CTty get into a problem with enforcement. Mr. Corrigan stated that CC6Rs are one of the toughest things to enforce. He felt the quality of the protect wWld be the determining factor. He stated that the applicant did not build and sell, they managed the properties. There were no further public conments. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to direct staff to Initiate an Industrial Specific Plan Amendment td expand the deftnltton of the Building Maintenance Services category to permit small building contractor uses. ... •+ Planning Commission Minutes -20- Apr11 12, 1989 /~~ EX~//g/T[$ ~~ k h h h h PUBLIC HEARINGS H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS"eSSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC l.~ I I Ur RMI1 Li1V '..U I. MI'I U I,uM MII QIIIC II VIIIC IIL LU LIIC 1611V U>C I "building mai ntena rce services" to Inc'. ude small operation buiiding contractors which meet certain criteria. Brett Horner, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Hearing no testimony, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the amendment was well written and the use would be a good addition. He felt the truck definition and the prohibition of outdoor s*.orage would eliminate possible adverse effects. Commissioner Chitiea felt the expanded definition might help to make more centers viable. Chairman McNiel agreed that the added language made sense. Commissioner Emerick felt the expanded definition might encourage some sm alt businessowners to move out of garages into centers. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and industrial Specific Plan Amendment 89-02. Motion carried 6y the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Ao~E r. COMMI$SIO C f~ I YF CI FV r rr iPd N NCR... 9_.4..____. - a h * x h + Planning Commission Minutes ~~ May 24, 1989 EXHBl4T B r ~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INOU STRIAE SPECFFIC PLIW AMENCMENT 89-02 TO INCLUDE SMALL OPERATION CONTRACTORS NHICH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN THE LAID USE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES", AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. WHEREAS, on the 24 day of May, 1989, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant Lo Section 65864 of the California Governnent Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this alrendnen w not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration an May 24, 1989. NON, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65650 to 65855 of the California Government Code, ~ that the Planning Commission of the City of RaRho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of this amendment. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recomoends that the City Council approve this amerdnent to the Industrial Specific Plan per the attached Ordinance. NlIOVIGU MU /YIUIILU IO 1J GYIp UNI Ur RNI, llm. PLANNING COMMFSSION ATTEST F RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Pe solution was duly and r'2guidriy infrvduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of Iky, 1989, by the fallowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMiSSi0NER5: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: CCMM155[ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY /39 ORDINANCE N0. 3 / AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE SMALL OPERATION BUILDING CONTRACTORS 61H1CH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN THE LAND USE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING IMINTENANCE SERVICES". NHEREAS, on the 21st day of June, 1989, the City Council heid a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The land use definition of "Building Maintenance Services" s amen ed to read as follows: Building Maintenance Service: Activities Lypicalty inc u e, u are no 1'Tm~d to: maintenance and custodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and extemdnatTng services, and ,~anttorlal services. Small operation contractors may be included in this category, provided that the contractor has no outdoor storage of any materials or equipment, no inoperable vehicles or non-motorized trailers, nor any vehicles in excess of 84" in width or 6,000 pounds in gross weight. SECTION 2; This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely ee eFe environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. .~/ '~O --CITY OF RANCHO CGCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT ~- DATE: June 21, 1989 _i T0: City Council and City Manager ~! FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ RY: wait Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer ~'i SDDJECT: Amendment to Title 12 of the Municipal Code allowing ii exclusion of the construction of sidewalks on residential streets I RECOI/EMDATIOM: tt is recomaended that the Cfty Council conduct a public hearing and introduce the ordinances relative to the provisions for deletion of sidewalks on specific streets as approved by resolution. background/Analysis The requirements of the Municipal Code regarding the construction of sidewalks consistent with City standards (Title 12) continue to be a source of irritation with property owners proposing to build or remodel single-family residences. Because of the unique nature of some residential areas of the community, there have been requests of the City i~.u°: u~°`1...... ~~ ~w C~....nn H.n u1..nur nt ni wtr::~tlnn Hd~::.~il ~:~ ,.r.. ~.. C^y. .... ~~~ .. ..~ both sides of the street, especially in hillside areas. The Development Code (Title 17) requires area streets except in the case of a planned community or specific plan which has established specific standards. An Ordinance has been prepared which would allow the City Council by resolution to designate certain streets as exempt from the requirement of standard sidewalk construction. Respec u Maltted, ' 1 `~ ,`~ RHM: MJS~d'-~ Attachment I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM GATE: June 21, 1989 T0: City Ccuncil and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: '"~~ lusion of the construction of sidewalks on residential streets -aa-ardinanca-a~n~egdia~Tit}ri2-a~the' RECBI/EIOATIBN: IL is recommended that the City Council conduct a publ7c hearing and introduce the ordinances relative to the provisions for deletion of sidewalks on specific streets as approved by resolution. Background/Analysis The requirements of the Municipal Code regarding the construction of sidewalks consistent with City standards (Title 12) continue to be a source of irritation with property owners proposing to build or remodel single-family residences. Because of the unique nature of some residential areas of the canwxmity, there have been requests of the City from developers to forego the requirement or construcnng sidewalks on both sides of the street, especially in hillside areas. The Development Code (Title 17) requires area streets except in the case of a planned community or specific plan which has established specific standards. An Ordinance has been prepared which would allow the City Council by resolution to designate certain streets as exempt from the requirement of standard sidewalk construction. Respectfully submitted, RNM:'dJS: sd Attachment ORDINANCE N0. ~g'~ D AN CRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADD[NG SECTION 12 ,08.040(A) TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDENALKS ON CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL STREETS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOHS: Section 1: Chapter 12.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 12.08.040(A) to be read, in words and figures, as follows: "12.08.040(A) Construction of ublic i ravements - ~Reqqu~ir~~e~~m__en_t_s__. d-T~ie provers o~fZTap~l exc~construction of sidewalks on residential streets which have been specifically exempted by resolution of the Clty Council. Section 2 TIIC Vi YJ VVYII,.i 1 YG1.14ici 411Y t, i11 V111 U 411j [II V~ 1i iVll, ac,rti Vll, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared Invalid by any final court action in a court of competent furisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and Lhe City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The~Oai~l! Re o~rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of n ar o0 t 1 ~ California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. l~3 1 B. Pazagraph A above shall apply only to those residential streets, or portions of residential streets, which are of such a unique nature that would set them apaz[ from the general city. Examples would include some hillside developments, portions of streets abutting areas where sidewalks have not been required in the past, or areas where a sidewalk could not be constructed due to existing or proposed physical constraints as determined by the City Engineer. PASSED, APPROVED and ADWTED this day of 1989, AYES: COUNCIL MEM8ER5: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: every ut a et, ty e I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was given a first reading at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of nmiuw ~uCaia4uyd lidiu u,i tic d6i 4f , :+~~ u 'yuul iG hearing was held on the may of I989, and~was finally passed at a regular meet nag oP the City ou-C ncfl~ the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1989. Executed this day of _ 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~` every t e et, ty e I~ 2 - ------- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA =~ STAFF REPORT ;y~`~~ ~` ~. DATE: June 21, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM.: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNllAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (SSPD1. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Hearing, and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments with the Park and Recreation Improvement District. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must approve an Annual Engineer's Report which reviews the status of the district and projected revenue and expenditures to establish the rate of assessment for the next Fiscal Year. The assessment rate has remained a... _ rate`EOr Fiscal Year`1989/90~c=__ ~~~ ~~_._ __,..__: __ ....,. ,. a: ..~ Single Family Residential $ 33.50 Parcels less than 1.5 acres 16.75 1.5 acres to 3.5 acres 50.25 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 117.25 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 234.50 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 469.00 25.01 acres and larger 837.00 Residential property with more than one dwelling unit are assessed for an amount equal to $33.50 times the number of dwelling units. uec tiu.(i/(~y su~bm i~t~t e~d~ n IV • ~Y`/w/wcc- Jerry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager Attachments: Resolution Engineer's Report s RESOLUTION NO. 8~ -~ 9 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 86PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK). WHEREAS, the Cily Councl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of May, 1989, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 89-226 to order the therein described work in connection with the Park and Recreation Improvement District which Resolution of Intention No. 89-2'L6 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Irtention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duty received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resclved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District Tor the fiscal year 1989/90, and said City Councl hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-226, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report tiled by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1988-$9 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. ~~S ~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report 85-PD Fiscdl Year 1989/50 Author ity For Report This report Eor the 1989/90 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division i5, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways Code. Provisions fer this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscaping a..^,d Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis far the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. BS-PD, thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City o£ Aancho Cucamonga. . nd:nG Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1472, requires assessments to he levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount tc be assessed 'anon lands within an assessment district may be ap- portioned by any Ecrmula or met'nod which f a:rly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots cr parcels in proportion to the estimated benef as tc be received by each such lot oz parcel Erom the impravemer.ts." The means of determining whether or not a parcel wr 11 'penef it from the improvements is contained in the Imprav ement Act of 1911 ;Division 7, comment inq with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of CaliEcrnial. The 19'2 Act also provides e c.,.....:E:c attcn ni vaciuus areas '...*,in an assessment district into ben of it tar eas where, by reason of var iations`in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive during differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. Benefiting areas consist of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of 6eneEit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncont.goous areas. Estimate of Cost The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal year. Costs far the district wl ll be reviewed annually, Any surplus credited against assessments or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for tha following fiscal year. 1989-1990 Fiscal Year Estimated Costs & Budget Summary Balance from 1988-89 Budget $ 47,887 Contributions (interest earned) Redemption Fund/Limited $ 32,552 to Pay Hond Debt Service Special Reserve Fund/Limited $ 16,965 to Pay Bond Debt Service Total Estimated Available Funds $ 97,404 County Special Charges S 5,483 Administration Charges $ 88,616 Consultant's Fees $ -0- Debt Service Installment 11/2/90; $303,733 Debt Service Installment 17/2/901 $803,733 Operation & Maintenance $191,226 $1,092.791 Balance to Assessnent $995,387 Method cf Spread The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which Ea iriy distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. Definitions The D1Strlc+. is dividad into thYee categories fem. t.",c purpose c~ der ermtn my the assessments as follows: Category A - includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. Cateyory H - includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes fer those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than $500. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel mans. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions: Parcel Size Range Number of Existing Res. Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than I.5 acres and I.51 to 3.5 acres and 3.Si to 7.0 acres and 7.Oi to 14.0 acres and 14.01 to 25.0 acres and os ni ,...o c i,...o. ~.,.~ 1 cr more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units d or more dwel i.ing units e or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units vc ,.. ..,,..e n..,<ii: .... .. Category A is based on the number cf existing residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per exist my residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are 6u ilt within the improvement district. Maintenance costs, however, are expected to increase annually and will somewhat offset the antic rpa ted decrease in assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: nu e,~efi ~aL aarcai5 a5 ueC iced Leiow: 1. all properties currently tax exempt; 2. all public ownerships; 3. cailroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. major uttlity transmission rights-of-way; 5. mineral rights; 6, parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. all normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less then $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and a• non-profit organizations (i.e., churchesl. C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1989/90 Ss $33.50 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than on residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to 533.50 times the number of dwelling units. Category B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 1989/90 shall be according to the following schedule: Definition less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 7,01 acres to 14.0 acres 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.01 acres and larger Assessment Pec Parcel $ 16.75 $ 50.25 $117.25 $234.50 $469.00 $837.50 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.0 Eor Category C parcels. The individual 1989/90 assessments by Assessor's parcel number have been tabulated and are on file with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cuc artonga and are hereby made a part hereof by this reference. Assessments Single Family units 26,117 at 33. 50 = 874,919 .50 Less than 1.50 acres 874 at 16. 75 = 14,639, 50 1.5 acres to 3.50 acres 348 at 50. 25 = I7,4g7. 00 3.51 acres to 7,0 acres 231 at 117. 25 = 27,084. 75 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres I42 at 234. 50 = 33,299. 00 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 52 at 459. 00 = 24,386. 00 25.01 acres and larger 79 at 837. 50 24,297. '0 1,016,104.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Parks & Recreation Improvement District $34.80 $34.60 $34.40 $34.20 $34.00 $33.80 $33.60 $33.40 1 r i ~ i ~ i~ r 85/88 86/87 87/88 88/89 89190 Fiscal Year -*+- Assessment Rates --- ------- C[TY OF' RANCHO CIiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager .;.,'.~ SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL EPJGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Hearing, and approve the Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. BACKGROllND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must approve an Annual Engineer's Report which reviews the status of each district and projects revenue and expenditures to establish the rata of assessment for each district Eor the next Fiscal Year. [:..n+i.,n nie+rin+ Nn 1 ILr+nriall remainc a+ R7 59 nar dwelling unit. The remaining districts 12 thru 61 all for local street lights within various sections of the City. Each is proposed to be set at a rate of $20.00 per dwelling unit. Following is a summary of 1986/87, 1987/88, 1988;89 and 1989/90 rates kor each of the lighting districts: 86/87 67/88 88/89 89/90 L.D. #1 IArteriall 7.52 7.52 7.52 7.52 L.D. #2 ILO rall 32.23 25.00 23.00 20.00 L.D. #3 IVictorial 48.03 35.00 27.00 20.00 L.D. #4 (Terra Vistal 32.21 25.00 22.00 20.00 L.U. #S (Cat ynl -0- 38.50 35.00 20.CC L.D. #6 (Industrial) -0- -0- 25.00 20.00 R llny subm't` rry Fulwood Deputy City Manager Attachments: Resolution Engineer's Reports RESOLUTION NO. V (~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of May, 1989, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 89-228 to order the therein described work in connection with Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 which Resolution of Intention No. 89-228 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquued lurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for the Fiscal Year 1989/90, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-228, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1988/89 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. /~~ ~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 (ARTERL4L) -1- F IscAL YEAR Isasiso CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRF., CITY ENGINEF,R Annual Engineers Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Arterial Streets Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report Far Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 iArterial Streets) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act cE 19721. This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89 and the projected expenditures Eor fiscal year 1909/90 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials Eor the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as ind.cated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of zny irt~provement providing far illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval Ear each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1988/89 Review ~ 88/89 As of Projected Hudqet 3/31/89 6/30/89 Assort Admin 48,720 48,720 48,720 Maint/Oper -0- -0- _0_ Capital Expend 20,000 -0- 20,000 Electric 42,000 21,656 21,655 110,720 70,376 90,376 During fiscal year 1988/89 the fallowing tracts and lights were annexed into Street lighting Maintenance District Na. I: I ANNEX 40 TRACT 12643 49 S.F. TRACT 13555 47 c c ii TRACT 13556 40 S.F. TRACT 13558 52 S.F. TRACT 73560 23 S.F. TRACT 77567 43 S.F. TRACT 13563 44 S.F. DR 87-11 5 ASST. UNITS ?M 9350 206 S.F. DR 87-26 62 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 41 TRACT 12070 67 B.F. DR 07-16 7 ASST. UNIT ANNEX 42 TFACT 13425 71 S.F. ANNEX 43 DR 86-43 5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 44 TRACT 13476 37 S. F. TRACT 12902 29 S. F. ANNEX 95 TRACT 73644 24 S.F, PM 9504 32 ASST. UI9ITS CUP 87-04 7.7 ASST. UNITS DR 86-32 65 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 46 TRACT 12650 35 S.F. TRACT 12650-4 36 S.F. TRACT 13715 5 S.F. TRACT 13697 47 S.F, TRACT 13742 17 S.F. ANNEX 47 TRACT 13318 16 S.F. rnn ai_io i in acem imirmc CUF 87-42 4,54 ASST. UNITS DR 87-41 2.56 ASST. UNITS DR 87-52 176 ASST. UNITS PM 10941 14.58 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 2i, 1989 DP. 81-29 8.7 ASST. UNITS TRACT 11748 232 S.F. TRACT 13857 TRACT 13850 TRACT 13273 128 S.r'. DR 07-55 16 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13270 280 S.F. CUP o6-19 6 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER S, 1998 CUP 07-16 16 ASST. UNITS CUP 07-26 21 ASST. UNITS TRACT 12659-I 138 S. F, ANNEXED OCTOBER 19, 1988 PM 9897 30 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13728 34 S. F, PM 11341 Zs ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 2, 1980 DR 87-69 9.7 ASST. UNITS DR 87-61 7 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEN9ER 16. 1988 PM 10783 23 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13367 19 S.F. ANNEXED DECEMBER 7, 1988 PM 1023A 9 ASST. UN LTS TRACT 13692 19 ASST. UNITS DR 08-10 8.5 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13542-2 30 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED DECEMBER 21, 1989 DR 86-27 12 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED JANUARY 4, 1 989 DR 07-11 1.4 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13063 74 S.F. DR 07-19 DR 07-20 11 ASST. UNITS FOR HOTH TRACT 12332-2 151 S.F. MDR BB-19 19 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED JAI4UARY 18, 1989 DR 87-61 26.69 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13281 205 S.F. DR 88-20 8.10 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13753 132 S.F. FEBRUARY I, 1999 TRACT 12895 d ASST. UNIT5 FEBRUA.R'f 15, 7989 PM 1tl90i 36 .6b ASST. UNITS MAP.CH I, 1989 TRACT 74150 64 ASST. UNITS PM 11030 143 ASST. UNITS MARCH 15, 1909 DR a7-o6 21.6 ASST. UNITS ii o"0-20 r i. i,SST. Y UNITS 88-16 DR 6 ASST. UNITS APRZi. 5, 1909 TRACT 13432 56 S.E. DR 87-42 1.28 ASST. UNITS TRACT 13542-3 24 S.F. TRACT 1382] 5 S.F. DR 07-44 3 ASST. UNITS TRACT 11606-1 41 S.F. Praj, Hudqet 84/85 BS /86 86/87 B7/00 88 89 89/90 Assort Admin -0- 1235 4059 31,952 48,720 69,752 Overhead -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 2,751 Maint/Oper 2805 2902 50 130 -0- -0- Electzic 21,518 25,449 25,974 29,851 42,000 62,000 Cap Expend -0- _-0- -0- -0- 20,000 _8,000" 2-0,403 29,586 30,003 61,933 110,720 142,503 "Portion of carryover funds to be used far street light installation. Projected Revenue After review of current and projected expenditures it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 will remain at $7.52 per assessment unit. The projected carryover funds f$ 66,7701 will be used to fund the district until assessments are received in January. Prujec ted Liphts Projected Assessments 229 - 5,800 17,430 at $ 7.52 = $131,134 229 - 9,500 426 at $15.04 = $ 6,407 I - 22.000 R137.sdt 12 ~- 27,506 ii GITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 $s $a $~ $s $5 i -i ~ i ~ r T--r-~ i 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year -F+-- Assessment Rates ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. HD 1~I. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR. 13556 Z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION NO. yo 11r1111'I~ala ~,.~„~,al,alwlul,.~~ s~ar~a~~a°~a~a/~~~a1 p,' N'M'N'4 ~M 7~IMIH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTo T14. ~355~ Ia1N U ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LICiHTINCi MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. y0 NNI ~1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTS TR, 135(00 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING AAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 40 I~ liJ. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECTS r. J356~ ~.. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. '~ O ~ t! 7t u ~ HaanyLtia 11 I H/ lY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTS ~. 13563 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. ~-FO N IGHLI-ND AV6NUE _r .:..ar ..... S R R.R. ~^. ~ ' ...' ~i ~ i • :~ ~ 3 :, ,a~~ ., = ~: = ,. ~ i. r ~ -~ w1U~ ~ Z BA JFLf PIS li0A0 I ii ~~~ N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: P m. 9350 ,,_ . ,,i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI(iHTINti MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. y I ~, ~ ~ . __ __ • i 4 ~ ` /~ 1 I I I I •, 1 V X14MLW AV l ,uI /_ /1r O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR. lag~o 3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIt3HTINQ MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. ~ I fMfNILL 0.YQ n4.o • LMU~a_r~wur Naiw~ connax ....•~• ~ w ' IM W ~Illr YIwU11Y 'IWYW ~yM '`-• NAY ~ ~ IINM~ • W O nq,p 1 ~~ r M~ou Nuv. i N~ 1Y !~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA i PROJECT: p.R. 8~-i6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET ll(iHTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 4a u• ..++f~~ 'N ~I~~~`~ ~- ~-~ ,a , . ~. ., _~. a ~, a i et ~ i~ •i .w--i7 ~- i\ .o i u u /) ~ 4 •~ / \~• \ .. r~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~;' ~~~~ ~ ~'~ .a` r. ~ x ~~~~ ~ :, ~~. -~- ~ ~ of I °~ ~~/ s .~~ i 7y9• .~/ l~~ Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTi T . l3ya 5~ V M Q ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINti MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. t ANNEXATION NO. y'~ • r n • • • r • n r r r • • ~. Y w s ^ w u y ~ ~ t , r ~~ ~ . r w w ~~"- • r .rR~w .~.~ 1~~1 ~i 00TNI lL~~ NI'I lY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA /~~ PROJECTa TR. 13y 7~ 1~ v i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINti MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 4 y ~.'~a~o' .....J II ~- , I r. L II r_Ti •(YYMOI~ I ~I //•Cll = I J I I 1 r~-~,-° 1 3. I T~~Y ,~.,^ .' n I ~ .• 1 ~--~~ ~ ~ ~ r ll ~ 'L'll~= '~{/ ,~'' ~ u :• I i f 1` 31 10 It " L~i!~~+ x ~~ ~i ~w r r / u /rr ~_1 ~~~ ~ _ N // Wil I! Il Il ~ S .1 ,'.. 1• i --I~--• yin/ • r. r ~ //~/r au.. ~ + I I ': l~ ~ • s la n - L • ~_.~ s .: / rr+r IY/ L- - .+"' I ~~ it i l i" 7 I~i ~~~r• I I ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR . l ~ 9Ua, ----- - - _ ~ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LICiHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. HS .u ~JeJO T ~~ ~. r . ' ~r.~. * ~ ~I I 1 -- III 1 ~~ aim- ~ l ~ ~ I I ~~~~,/~ ~/'~~' ~MLLt1 1 ~~ ~~ J T ~' 1 1 tt _, I ~ ~ ~IQ ~ --.. ~ . ~ .. ' ~iwr~ .~ ~1 i 1 ~L~ ' ~w~ _ ~ b 7 ^~ ~ I :~ I ~ ^t YS •V ~ y,>~_ .. I I~ 'I- I I /`~~O U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: ~ R. l 3 6'`f ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIdHTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. H5 l vA~aHC'- ~~~, W 7 2 W t TERRA VISTA VIL6AQE ~.w. ssoa: ~~ J r :Aas wHt town ~~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJEGT~ Prn, 9so~- [e (p ~~ ASSE$~MENT DIAtaRAM ~I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE G1ISTRICT NO. ~ ~ ~I ANNEXATION NO. 45 it i I ///~`U? 17-04 ~ j t I / / 1 1 ~ it ICI ~. ~ ~ j~ i i LE ,, ~' ~~ ® ~~ V ~' ._ II ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 II ~~~ ~~~~ I I I j ~I Ii = ~urw. s~r ~~ y~y~~~~nt! ao ~ i it U it „~-_ NIGNlAMO AV(MIE ~ 1~~ w ~ ~ IIII, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: C U. K k7-0 `~ V 1 i i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ~ I ~ ANNEXATION NO. ~}5~ I~ I I i~ i ~I roorwitt via weal p . ~ ill ~ ~ f ~ ~ 2 c, I i • ~ i~ r i I~ I I' I IE I I Ll~P r I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA ~/ ~ I PROJECT: U h' ~6 3.~ t ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. ~}~ I I i,.l I, I.,ItO~ ~ I y' ~ ~ j 1 32 I- ~ 29 30 ~;S a3 ~I2+ 25 26 I27 26 37 ~~ n ~! s J4 y ',h e2 21 I~ 20 19 18 35 36 ~ ~3 9 t0 a 12 1 -~ 5 ~ \4 \" \ E NI ~~S IOE NO~J / ~ T l~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: TR 1a~50 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. H E. I 2 27 2By 29 '_.r-~~ 2~I2o 2gli 6 ~ ~I 16I 19II 20I 21 li 22 e 30 I i I _~ - r 3 5 , ^~ I 6 ~~ 8 I r ~ ~ I Ii ICI I~ •1I I~~I~ A ~Y 32 l 0 15 ~~ ~ 1 I 5r: 3 ' I ~' 3 , `~ '~ ~ ~ 3 '`c it ;c ,1 Tall r.'I i,~~\ ~\ 3i ~ ~ :C' c-, i ~~~~•~ n1 ~L51 DE ROAD ' L~Y I I W [-~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR I~.~SD-`/ V1 ASSESSMENT" DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 'I (~ ~i (T~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: 7pj X3715 ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM II i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRlGT NO. J ~ ANNEXATION NO. ={~ ', l I~ I' _ ~ m``°` ' 1~ ~ 1 I .~ ~; ® 1 I ~ M = •I J I I, 1 1~ i i ~~ ~ ill ' 's~r~ ~ ~~m~ it ~• .~ n y r H / III I III E ~ Ii . ~ ~ ~ _ i! ~ , ~~ ~~ I~ NN ~ i~ N l~ A c ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA i _ _ V' PROJECTS I K I3 `~'~,~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ; ANNEXATION NO. y'7 i' ~"/:~ )I i'r f,, I~ __ 1- --+~ _ .y. _ ~ f ~ Ik R ~ ~ , :i h ~ `/. L It l ~~ ~y 'V~ yi ... ~ ~ i I:,y ~. ~ 7 -. ~/1~ + .h=~ ~ ...hr ~. ~ ~ « J~~n ~ , y~,.r ~~~ . '~ ~. 1~~, • ~ 'a I . ~ ~ r ~ :f 11 ' .• i ICJ 1 I I J ' •I I, 11 1. ~~ l~ i Y I• ' ~ .~ I• •• ~ ,' , ....._ _.::..~.1... I C 1~ ~ •1• i`' .I ~~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CIYCAMONQA PROJECT: Tr1 13318 d ~i IA ( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ j STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DlSTRtCT NO. / ~ ANNEXATION NO. "/'J ~ Ij I~ I; ;i ii II ~i --- -° ~ -'Sire -- -'; ~•--------~--- R ~ '~ ._ ...~ z W ~ > w ys _ ~ .~~ <' w 'I s .~w~/r /1 ~ III W I 1 ~ it ill I ~ III I I ~I 'I ~ ~I '' l~~ ~ E ,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: G ~~ ~ ~'7- N ~. ~I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION NO. Y 7 ~w~i `TM - ~~ ~~ ~". ~ -- ---~ 4~ --LL-U-_ - ee~ea, vibt.~, e+YiKT uN+~'I or wK~+v a4u~.r°w~ xerae .r. I / _n~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT: C. L: F? 5'7~ 5~2._ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I'I I~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I it I~ ANNEXATION NO. 47 I ~~ ~~ li I ~ I ~' J L ur;~ow II j I i I I ~ N77 i I I~I 1 F! / ICI l ~~ I I it II' i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA '~ PROJECT: D, F2, 8i-`II jl - ___ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 4 7 ~ I ~~ _ -~i as ~'~ i ._ I III it i I ~t i I i °t .SITE d~~ ~~ ~~ ~. i -L------------------ i ._ I; ', ~i ~ ,_ ~I ; j j <~ ~ I~ ~~ 11'~ iii ICI III 1'i ~~ r i i ~ _' j ) ~'~ -~~ ~ i ' j ~ r ii ii it I I I ~I I i I ~ ~P ~ tt CITY OF RANCNt) CUCAMON(iA III ~!) PROJECT: Q R 87- S~ ~ -- - II ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. y'7 ~! it ~~ ~i 'I ii I~I II W ~~ ~ W l 9 '< ~~ m ,Q,~ _ U Z ' • ~ C~ 2 i III Yp r. »~. rr..• ~ ¢ - i ,I,I bast f ~J~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ .~ I' 4'"5} _ 'il t ;I ~ I ~~ II ii ~ I to FRW . ' it I II i I -~1 I, 1 `~~ A L ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA PROJECTa f (Yl. 107 4 I V1 ~', ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 8TREET LItlHTINtl MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION y~a~~8~ a..~~y.,,~, r,r- , ram„ ij~l L_e_~_JI~ I I ~ i~_J I L_ r r i ..rr dr J II ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOiiTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION ~/~ / ~ ~~' j~ ~?f ~ i I ii ,rc ~ t ~ ~ ~ I j •~•„ ~~ ij ~~ i I , ii ~~~ it ,,, i ~~ i i .,, , , it 1 1 1 _ ~~ __ ~'~ ~~dna~wd w~~Y~ Ni ~~ I ^' LY ~~P A ~ i ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~~ PROJECT: 7R. 137H~; /,g8~'1, lyks~ !~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM l;l STREET LlOHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. l ANNEXATION 9%1~~~d~ I j' Il ~ ,~ ~~ y . ~/ \\ ~ i .~.. ~` ~ r ~ ~~ ' l \ ~' ~I ~~1 ~~ l~ ~ r . ` ~\ ~ Ili,., ~ ~. r j f A ~y ~. Tf' i, `.. ,~ !' i!, ~ . ,.. if ~ ' ~ f ~.'„ ~ ~\ li ~I3'.Y ~.... it ,~, h'~ ~_~ ~\ ., r Y 11 `~ ~ • .i ~ _ ~I , it ~ ~• ~ yf~ l.-_ ~ ._ ---~-rT - ~ ! ~I I; I '' II ~I /~l~ A L ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~~l PROJECT: (K, 1347.3 i ASSESSMENT pIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION 9~.a/~~~ __ _ I 1 y ~ .r' -- ---- i~ `J `~ - !I I y '-- - - ~ '~ I ~ ' 1 ~ ~ a ~~-~ ~ N;~ ~~ ~' ~. ..., e (I[ I I ,J \\ `~. ~ ~ rt I~l I `~P A K ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONi~A PROJECT: ~ h~. 87-~ J ~/t ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINq MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION 9~~~~P6' l it ~~~ A N (~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA VI PROJECT: rR, ~3~ '70 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 8TREET ll®HTINO MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. / ANNEXATION y/ai~x~- .~,,.,._ ' I C u~ ~ { ~. ~. f, ,"..~ r i rNa(v.eo - ,. ~ yd,` `a;® ~ i ~ r fir, ,: - ~>.. s I ~a I :as ~ ,a ~ ~cz I ti+ i ~ I ~ 'j I~© ~isiCi~i~ if` ~~: a iRR i..r ., ' \9 rf4 I' ~I ~!1 ~ 4 ~' N ~' i ~ ®~pp i YY I = f r 4 ~i-~ ~ iv n 4 ~: {~ 4 a '-Y~" ~ - Q j.' •~ Y Y ~ '. '. Lit M 4 ~ 5 , (~ 4 I - I , 1'Y { ~Y 1 I O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: C U N ~s'~`j j ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1~ STREET LIOHTIN(i MAINTENANCE D93TRICT NO. / i ANNEXATION ia~a~8~ i it I iI~ lil • -- ,ao„a~ ~oaa~ -- i ___ _ _ I~ it •------------------- ~. ------ I ~ ---- _~- I _ ~- ' ~I '~ Ili 1~--. Viii ail: n -~ i i '~ _ ~^ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~.Z ~~ _ i ~~ '~ : uuss ~: : vu ~' ~ ~ - -. - ~~ ~11~~ ~'- I~~~o~lt ~~ Iii Lr ~ ~ ~: it N~ ~~ II ~I lY ~~~ [~ (^ A D I~ ' 1~'Y' / ~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ~~ PROJECT: C. v P, ~~-l~ ~' V ) ~ ASSESSMENT ®IAt'aRAM BTREET LIaHTINO MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. / ANNEXATION ~c%~s;4' ~, // II ~~"" Iil ?W ~ ~ (~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A IVA' PROJECT: C.U. F'. S'7'.~~P ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM i i ~' STREET LIQHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. I ANNEXATION /n/s~88 ~~ I I ~,i 'I iii ~~ ~ --.. ' ~ ,~ ;~ ~-> ~ ~ i ~._ '- ~ w ..n...r.~. n..,~l, t~ ~ ~ ~ „ :~ I , III ~ ~ ~ i `~~- »T~,.---~ j1ir~_- ,• ~~ I I~ ~! ~ I ~,' ~ ,, f~~ A~ CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONOA L Ili I ~ PROJECT: / R /.~ 659-/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET ~IQHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION /0~/9~8~s" ~`~~~ ~S CITY OF RANCHO CUCA-AONpA PROJECT: P(n 989'] 6 4~ _._~ ASSESSMENT DfAGf~AM 1 8TREET LIQHTIN~ MAINTENANCE 018TRICT NO. / II ANNEXATION io~iv/~~ II ~ ~ it .,' I a ~ rr J 1 r ~• ~ ! ~_ ' ~~ ~ ~ ,~- , ~ a~ ' ~ / I~ ~~ ~, I!I ~ I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA N PROJECT: /R. /:j 7u~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 8TREET LIOHTlNO MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION lc~i9~8~ i- ~"`mow :~ __1.~_..__ _~~-aTV~+~r P - .. 1 \~ ~'1 _ ~. .~ ~. ~~ ~ i - ~.. ;_--- _ L~~. _ J T ``~ i ~_1~ti ;q i~~ Au CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: f' I'1~ 113'{1 d w ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 ANNEXATION l1~~~8y Arrow A7 & SF RR ~ 6th ~r~~ ~:n ~-I~ ~~~ ~ v CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT; /~ k. ~7'D`J r ~~ ~~ ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LItiHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION U~'a~~~ s ~^ srw«r w ~~~ A w ~X. ~I t tI~ C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTt p R, b'7-~nl ~~ ~i .. ~. h s~rE ~1 ~ ~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ 1 i STREET LI(3HTIN~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION n~i~/~~ ~ ~I t ~' c_~i • Yt.L.~yi,~, 1 +~r ~ I' 111 1 i. 1 I ~ II I, ` I i i ~ ~ :.~, - , .r s ~ l ; II! i~ 1 fl ~-- I ~,,. .,, ~s- ., "fir __~ ~ ... ~~,,I ~ , ~1, Z'..~«7'...~"D ti w r i~ it i ~~~~~~ j ~ ~~ II lT LY i~~ qx ~! i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONt#A PROJECT: F' YPl 10~ 8.3 j ~r ASSESSMEId7 DIAGRAM ' ' STREET LIQHTINCi MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~ 1 ANNEXATION /~/ib~ b'k 4 I hill II !~ i ~~ -__ ~- < ~~ MWD R.C.N. ~ ,~ rl 'l _ ,~,,,.,,,,,o .,,,,u~,uR ~ I dal j ,, ~~ ,~ ~', ,, ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ CITY OF RANGNO CUCAMONOA PROJECTz ~~i 1.33 6 ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 STREET LIQHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i ANNEXATION /~/~/3~ r f \~ 1'~ I ~~O/ I ~ / ~ ~ Ili SAN ALANARO~NO AV"e. ~~ ~ _~ ~ ~~I- / a I ~I ,~ ~. Ij / 2 '` I ,, ~ I ~~ '~ ~ ~ I ~ I it j; I __.J ~I, - cnnTHi~ I A~.,n ~ II ,I '~ I`I~ Az ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: f' YYI. IAa3S' V~ '~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM _ ~ ~7REET LiOHTINCi MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION i 2~7/~'~ II wir~rlarra a/Nf ~~ ~. ~ -_- i :. T ." ~ ~ r Tr-_- 'I ~rCA7W'rt'lir I,S :C17 1 1 _ r 1 _ 1 1 !1 O I ~~ ~ ~ ~ _.. i ~ IYp~ ~ ~ +17' N ~I d ,~, ~ . i ,~ ~ - i ~ ~, ( _ ~ i ~ :ark= - ~~I``33~a ~ vtu r.u~c r "~~ ' .`\ w~rcrs „~ I ~' 1~~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONQA IJ~ PROJECT; Trt, 13~"/~ i/, ASSESSMENT t)tAGRAM i STREET LI4HTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQ. I ANNEXATION i~~7~~~ ~ ~;,,, ~ ~ rwwn ~ a~~ v,ll ~ , ~ ~ wa-a- ~ ~ ~ \yI ~ I I wa.a•M I I LL 1~.JJ ~`.1.. \..V ~ F F I I~:~ ~ / .. _... _.yi ~ r1 1Tr(~, I / •~i~ i ~ ~ ~ tires I. -- ~ , ~~=~ ~ ~ ; °II -.-,~. , _ .~.__ .. _ ..+w i lYl PI ' I ~ ~ wa-s-n y -»-r~-~~Q , ~ ` \ ~ I ~~ \ I . ~ : ~ ~7 ~~ w.-.-. ~ .Jll~i ~ ~ ~,~ A ~ p w•a•e`~ ~~C = ws a •w ~i l nr.wrr y I J y~ I~ ~i~l I I. ~ \Y ' n\ ~, ~ ~ .. ~. a `w~~~~y i _~ ~~ I ~~ ~ 1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: D R SK- 18' yY,7~tcr 3~TC'.r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQNTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ' ~ ANNEXATION i~~~/~b%. ~ wt~ll !~I -!;--!~!-~-~Y I-=~-i ~ ~ ~~(~ `~/ ~ ;I~` ~.J ~~ is ~~ r•eo~R++l `~ ~ C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT; TH. 135y~-a._ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI(iHTINQ MAINTENANCE DI8TRiCT N®. / ANNEXATION ~,~ ~a i ~ e~ ~_ ~ r'- _~ ~ f7! (C • ,Ile `• ~ , .:[~cioofD ~~ 5 jJ~ C r lI1 ^ ~a I ' a~ ~r r`) ~ .u< ~ I~ f !:_ ~' ,.9c ear © ~ I'O ~ DC~©~p lfD ~ .vs " I vwcwtir ,~jj® .p I ~.... ., .... , i:.. ~' ~ J ~I~ vn~Nr ... bl '~,~ ~ • ~~ ~o lY /T~ ~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: U ~', kb-d'J ~l! ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 11 STREET LIaHTiNfl MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. I ~ ANNEXATION i~y~89 ~~ ~, i ~\ ~~ !:! i I~ IAI "'"r ~ I ~ i .... av • ' ~ i. ~ , ~~ III ~i ~ ~~. ~ . ar_L_t r~ _ ~ III i i ~' I __ q MN f i ...r .~ I "1~".M~ V i ii ~ i ! i ~ ~ ~ '.I ~"' I ~, -~51 T E I,~ I~ +3 E ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PRO ECT: - / ~/, J D. R, 87 7 ~~ -- -- . 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 STREET LIaNTINO MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. / i ~ ANNEXATION //y~~9 :?ice-=~-°2 ~.u.~.~~~,s~-tea .r~~ ~ iii iiRi'.L. 3 I ~' ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~d I I ~ i .~ u I, a 4 ~~ .,. _, ~~ ~~ , . 113 •~~) / ~~ n u ~ I it ~ I I i c% ~ ~ i i a lV - ,-~ ~ ~i1 -- '~.7 ~ _' ~ a~ i '~- -. ' - -.~T-- .rr ~rrr wvr-'.- ~~ _ _ _ ~I ~ !~~ ~ ,~ / I/~ -~ I I 'h~F- CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA { VI ~ pROJEC7: Tk l 34 G 3 ~, -- --- -- - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINQ MAINTEF:ANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION i~y~~y r r-riM - -!- - r++ !~ i .~,,,_ ~. / ~ i ~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~,:~1 •w~ ~ r- i~ ,CYI~ I -Vb1~1 \,~ t ~~, i }- L ~~L -I! ~ ~~ l ~~.~ ~~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: D R S'I-19 a- ~7- d0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ STREET LI(iHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / 11 i I "NNEXATBON iw~~y _ I • ~J ~ ...~ r+... ... ~ s ---- - - III i I -~ • M~ • ~ .. ~ +w. • w.r ~rnw ..... ' .. .feu ~ •,.1'r: I~ i / v. r ' h.. ~_.. _. ~-_} ~ • i ~~ e i ~ e ~~ • ~ Y i • e ~, i ~-~ ~ o~e~e ~ ~ ~ i e • ~` ~ ~ II it '•• " t • ~ • • , ~ ~„ p ~I~ •~~ ~y-' a it • ~ I' jl I i II it I loll i ~~ I TKO ~ l~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA ~ PROJECT; TR. 1„23;-~ ~~ ASSESSMENT ®IAGRAM STREET LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION if~~~p I~ ~~ ~ J f tcctnu b:~~. I ~ III I ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ El a, .• lacatlon ~ /o,~f5 A/fiMwr~~• arrow rout Rt. U. 9/9J0 i ~r ~ I~I ~~, I~ Y~ 1 y i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Il •faa •t. ! I i' ~ ~ ~ ' I a.t. ~ a.t. rallroaei III I I III ~I ~I~ , 'i l~t~ ~ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA II PROJECTS /YIO /'~. ~~`/~ V t ~, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LICiHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION i~~4~~y f~~~J. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT: D ~, g~-J/ 3/r~- 6 IA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 018TRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION l l ~~ f tiq III ----- ^-----=----_--.:.r..-.e~.::===--_"-------_~ ~~ G ~ •.: ^aia~ a ' ~~I(' ~. I.i / + i /,11/1• i / i Ii/ I.i Ly li 1' ~ }~ 1,+ +.y 1~ + 31 , I i i ~ ~ ) 3 : ~`i li i ~' 111 i,,: ~ ~ 1j~j1 _~ ' a1 S 7: 6 i t f i ,aa.w ~ 11! II i t i~ p :; 1 7 7 + y i I if i %~ ~ '.~ j : i,:' 7~ ~ ~'~ i • •, i r . ~ ~• • --_ a .. ~~ _. ~' ' ~ .1 • •'_~• ff f ~ +~• ~ ,1 i I •~ I III -~'~• ~ 6 •I.I. , . ~' 'i1i a • • •e •i• • al•~•~,a o ~? ~~ oaw w I ~ ~;I j ~ i ii ~, 1 1 I ~~~~ ~ ~ I! 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR 13as/ VV 11 s ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ STREET LI(iHTINfd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. j ANNEXATION ~/i8/s9 i I- II ~r ~ 1 I~IIr1~ ;Ir>~rr ~ 4rY • ~ ~ y~ ey e Y r ...-_. "e r ~. ,.. III ~;' :.. __I ~a~~ Y,~~ ~~, r ~l ~ M •~ (I 1 ' ~ ~i ''ar~'a~ ~ ~i a ~ ~ i ~ a~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~'r 1 ti~ I; ~~~ ~~ - -- - ~~ I II I~ ~r~ i~ ~rj ~ ~ tiJ. 1~~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM i 1 STREET LIdHTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Nd. 1 ~I ANNEXATIQN l; l&~8y ~ ~~ II ~! II I~ I; ''1 rqr rw y~ n "~y1 '~i I + M • q ~ I Iq x ~~ q 1 Iq 1 ~ IY • 1 Y li :Y 1 u1 Y • ~- I i i ~x I 1 ql q Y ~ q i I .y-r' Y q • 1111 1 IiY IY ~ ~ Iq ~ I ;II N NI Y Y ~ Iq ! `i A• Y :li III q ~ Y 11 Y Y Y q 11 11 q ~YNq I III yy: I~ ~~__~!I_ w YI WYt=i ~ ~___ 7 l ii i l it I~ I~ I~ ~~ ~ / ~ "~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT; 7r~{, /9d ~D _. -- --- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~~ I ~ STREET LI(3HTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / it ANNEXATION ~/iS/~y 1! I. ~1 ~ ~, ,- ~ ~s~u+~xn i6MTNlfsT W"nwwrv.w ~ I!! ~~ I r Y Y r r • v u ~ ~~~~ r i 4 Y 11 ~. ~ ~ ::'YI i4 ~ r N ~ ~ • ~ 4 m I: ! ~ 1 W Y I Y Y A 1 ~ 4 r 11 1 !~ m .Y r 4 II Y 4 u r 4 M ~G 41 }- It1111111'' Y 4 3- r _ °, , r .'I" u• ~ 1 4 U q ~1' ~ ,1/1 W~ I, I ! ''i ~~ '~ ~ ~1 jli /`~~ `~ ~l ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON4A I PROJECTI ~ / 3 7~ 3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI@HTIN@ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. _r~,~ ANNEXATION ~2/~/89 GAaRIG1. 'DR1 UG SuNNY6~lN~l dWR~eRR`( it ~~ Ac.eR Coue~' /T~P~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: TR la89S ~~ 17I ASSESSMENT' DIAGRAM 8TFIEET LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE 018TRICT NO. / ANNEXATION a~is~g9 ~~~ - o ~~~ ~~ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONAA PROJECT: f~(>7 /D y8/ >~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ 1 i ANNEXATION 3~~~Sy II iI II': it __ ~ ~, ."' it ~~~ ~ ~ II 'II i. ~ ,. _ !~ s: .. Ij ~~ i~ ~! I I ~ l ~~I CITY OF RANCNO CUGAMONOA PROJECT: 7R. /y/SO V - - 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNESCATION 3~~ j8~ d~ „~, - ~_.~ I ~~P ~~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: R~7 /1D30 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 8TREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION 3~is/8y ARROW ROUTE w JERSEY BLVD. t~ dos91E f xf 1 5 6TH STREET u'f ~ I-10 l~~ ~$ S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: (~ ~. 87-~(~ .; q I~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 i STREET LI~HTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION 3~ /~~~"9 ~ S/TE +~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ f~_I_ - NY~rt~fti Ytt~~1L ! ® ~ Ili ~ O ~ ,~ W. 6~ ;.. 1 WY r ~ o-. ~ e .WPM i .s~~ Ili „~ _ . i ~ ~ ~-~'TC d~ ~" ~ ~ ~I Wry . w ~r i • ~ ' I s_~ +r a ei..r-~~ I I ~I l ii I ii i Iii _j_ ~~ i 1tnY1~ ~ ~~~ `~T ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUGAblONQA ~ PROJECTi C~ U P ~~-~~ ~( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM l ~ STREET LICiHTINO MAINTENANCE Dl37RICT NO. / ~~ ANNEXATION 3~ is~~9 j it ~~ IIII 1~MIN7t__. _~Nip~l~~_.__ i i ~r ~aI -'i~ ~ "I' ~ ' ` r u i ~ ~ lo.. oQ ~ ~ ~ ~ .%I~.h rr: a•.h......:A~. I '~ 'I ~' I i ~'i I I I,, ~ ~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA II PROJECT: U~ 88-1l0 -- - -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTIN(3 MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. / ANNEXATION ~/~5~~~ 1 / ,/y/ ~ /r 62 I I 17 01 .60 N Il I 14 IJ 1! It 10 f 0 II 1 •6 •7 M ~~ I 10 10 17 If If ~ ~ / / •4 •J 42 41 i i 17! 24 23 2! i i I !i i i ~ ~. I ~~ ' ~ ~ W ~ 1 >N 27 ~ 2! i` y ~ I! ~ t ~ i ~ i r ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ 34 J.1'I ~ i it i i i r~a~ wewi I -~.arJL - 7 iI 1 i~~ ~ v OITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: ~TK. I35 ~/~ ~ i i i i i r i i i~ i 7 " - _~ ASSESSMENT DIAG~iAM II STREET LIOHTIN(i MAINTENANCE D13TRICT NO. i ANNEXATION -v~s~~~ II I \ °f a~ I I '~~~ ' -~~ ~I`I_y 4~ ~ ' y, r `W / ~~ ~ f '/ r 1, 4 / .r I r ~°~ f /~~•\r ~o i~ ~, I~I \``~-`,. __ CIVIC q OO~Vt nlT lY ~I i ~~ (`~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: O.YZ. 8~"N~ VV 11 ASSESSMENT D!A(3RAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION ~~s ~ky 1• IJ TT7, tWCI 1542 - 2 It I !! 16 I i I • t 9 20 21 2! 23 2~ I O ~ ~ 1 ~~~/i~ i//~~ / i 11 16 9 0 7 O fl 1 3 ~ ~ f ~~/ i ~ ~ ~ 12 /~ ~ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT: TR I~SYa"j ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINCi MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION 5~~5~8`j ~ ~ !I~ ~~ /`~~ ~ Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~fONQA PROJECT: T, /38x3 ^~ ~~ ~ ~ _ f r. ,~ 1i -i ., ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI~HTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. / ANNEXATION ~ /3~~~ ~, a b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON®A PROJECT: ~ fj 87- y~f l~~~Z~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ' -~\' STREET LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION `~ `- ='' ;' -- ~i v~rnowa. -- I i -~- i~ ~ ~ i~ I~ i ~ ~~ ii • ~ ~ ~ I ~ • M M N q ~~ ~ _4 V Ali 1-~./ _ M ~ ~ ~~ ._ '° ~~ i a "~ r r i • I ae w I i ~~ ~ A I~ ~ ~+ r I ~i u w ~ .. ~~ I! it i i ~~~ C, ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA l_.. - - -- -- - PROJECT: ~. //606 °/ ~/1 I ANNUAL F,NGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DdSTRiCT NO. 2 (LOCAL) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SLJf3MITTF.D BY: ASSF,SSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: _ ___ RTJS.SF.LL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER ' Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Local Streets Fiscal Year 1989/90 Tne annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nc. 2 lLoc al Streets( is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. This report deals with the projected casts Ear fiscal year 1998/99 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1989/90 to determine annual assessments. The assessments will he used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas within the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all oc any part of any improvement providing Eor illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of the inAividual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Piscal Year 1998)89 BA/89 As of Projected Budget 3/31 89 6/30/89 Assmt. Admin. 14,604 11,604 14,604 Capital Expend. -0- -0- -0- Electric 57,000 23,318 35,000 Maint./Oper. -0- 16 16 61,604 37,938 19,620 During fiscal year 1988/89 the fallowing developments and lights were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. ANNEX 26 i ~A('T 12970 6i S.F. ANNEX 27 TRACt 13425 71 S.F ANNEX 28 TRACT 13476 37 S.F. TRACE 12902 29 S.F. ANNEX 19 TRACT 13614 24 S.F, ANNEX 30 TRACT 12650 35 S.F. TRACT 12650-4 6 S. F. TRACT 13115 5 S.F. TRACE 13697 47 S.F. TRACE 17742 I7 S.F. ANNEX 31 TRACE 13318 16 S.F. ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 21, 79 88 TRACE 13748 232 S.F. TRACE 13857 TRACS 13858 ANNEXED OCTOBER 5, 1988 TRACE 11659-I 138 S.F. ANNEXED OCTOBER 19, 1998 TRACT 13728 3/ S.F. ANNEXED NOVEMBER 16, 198 8 TRACE 13367 19 S.P. FM 10783 23 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED DECEMBER 7, 1988 TRACE 13642 19 S.F. ANNEXED DECEMBER 21, 198 8 TRACE 13541-2 30 S.P. ANNEXED JANUARY 4, 1989 TRACT 13063 7i S.F. TRACP 12332-1 151 S.P. ANNEXED FEBRUARY 1, 1989 TRACE 11895 8 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED APRIL 5, 1989 TRACT ti696-I 11 S.F. TRACT 13813 5 S.F. TRACT 13541-3 21 S.F. 7RAi:~ 73542 56 S.F. Fiscal Year 1989/90 Projected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. 520,268 Electric 60,000 Overhead 2,027 Capital Expenditure 2,534^ Total $84,829 After review of current expenditures, projected revenue and possible carryover funds !$71,0001 it has keen determined that the assessment rate Eor Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 can be lowered Erom $23.00 to $20.00 Eor Ei scal year 1989/90. The carryover funds will be used to support this district until assessments are received in January. The carryover amount is due in part to Edison rebates. Until exact energy rates are established these funds will be reserved in part foY possible rate increases. Lowering the assessment rate will still provide sufficient funding for this district. Projected Liqhts Projected Assessments 452 - 5,800 3067 at $20.00 = $101,340 4 - 9,500 ^Street light installation CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 $ao Aso S2o $t0 I ~ ' T 'T" ~ ' T I e5/88 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year --a-- Assessment Rates ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 (VICTORIA) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CPI'Y ENGINEER • Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report Eor Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria P Lanned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirement aE Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. This report outlines the projected costs foz fiscal year 1986/89 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1969/90 to determine the necessary assessment rate. The assessments will be used to Furnish services and materials Eoz the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be cf general heneEit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement cE all or any part of any improvement providing for the illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers Eor the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval Eor each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1988189 Review Projected Annual Costs 88/89 As of Projected Budget 3/31/89 6/30/89 Assmt. Admin. 11,760 11,760 11,760 Electric 46,000 25,252 46,000 57,760 37,012 57,760 During fiscal year 1988/89 the fallowing projects within the Victoria Planned Conmun ity were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. ANNEX 9 PM 9350 206 ASST. UNITS JA.NUA.RY !B, !989 TRACE 13281 205 S.F. TRACT 1375] 132 S.F. TRACT 17280 I72 S.F. This district experienced normal and routine expenditures during the current fiscal year. Fiscal Year 1989/90 Projected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. $i 3,928 Electric 48,000 Overhead 1,393 Capital Expenditures 1,741 $65,062 After review of exoendituras, projected revenue, and nrojected carryover ($52,0001 it has been determined that the assessment rate for Sireei Lighting District No. 3 can be lowered Erom $27.00 to $20.00 per assessment unit. The projected carryover funds will be used to support this district until assessments are received during January. Projected Lights Projected Assessments 504 - 5,800 3482 x $20.00 - $69,640 6 - 9,500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 --o-- Assessment Rates 85/86 96/87 87/88 88/89 99/90 Fiscal Year ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 i (TEII.RA VISTA) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER ' Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 Terra Vista Planned Cononunity Fiscal Year 1909/90 The annual report far Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Conmuni tyl is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California iLandscaoi ng and Lighting Act cf 197.1. ':his report deals with the pzcjected casts foz fiscal veer 1999!99 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1989/90 to determine annual assessment rates. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ozdinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed by the developers Eor the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval Eor each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1988/89 Review Projected Actual Costs 88/89 As of Projected Rudqet 4/30/89 6/30/89 Assmt. Admin. 7,140 7,140 7,440 Electric 30,000 II,de1 25,000 37,440 18,921 32,440 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 experienced normal and routine expenditures during the current fiscal year. During fiscal year 1988/89 the fallowing projects were annexed to this district: ANNEX 8 PM 9504 32 ASST. UNITS i ANNEX $FpTF,.MiEn 77, 7904 TRACT 13270 140 S. F. TRACT 13273 128 S. F. ANNEX OCTOBER 19, 1988 PM 9897 30 ASST. UNITS PM 11341 23 ASST. UNITS MARCH I, 1989 'T&ACT U150 64 ASST. UNITS PM 11030 143 ASST. UNITS Fiscal Year 1989/90 Projected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. 17,352 Electric 33,000 Overhead 1,135 Capital Expend. 1,419 46,906 After review of current expenditures, projected carryover !$46,000!, projected expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for fiscal year 1989/90 can be lowered from $17.00 to 520.00 per assessment unit. The projected carryover will be used to fund this district until assessments are received in January. The large carryover amount is due in part tq Edison rehates. Until exact energy rakes are established these funds will be reserved in part far possible rate increases, Prof aced Lights Proiecte0 Assessments 174 - Sa00 2838 x $70.00 $56,760 15 - 9500 I - 22303 1 - 77,33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 Fiscal Year -o-- Assessment Rates 85/86 86!87 87/88 88(89 89/90 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. b (CARYN) FISCAL YEAR 1889/90 CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District Nc. 5 Caryn Planned Community Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 ICaryn Planned Comnuni ty) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division t of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1988/89 and the projected expenditures Eor fiscal year 1989/90 to determine annual assessment rates. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and costs shall 6e divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Projected Expenditures 88/89 As of Projected Bodnar 3/31/99 6/30/89 Assmt. Admin. 1896 1896 1896 Electric 1500 2212 1500 9396 4108 6396 Street Lighting Maintenance District Na, S experienced normal and routine expenditures during the current fiscal year. ANNEX TRACT 11613 19 S.F. TRACT 13555 17 S.F. TRACE 13556 10 S.F. TRACT 13558 52 S.F. TRACT' 17560 23 S.F. TRACT 13561 13 S.F. TRACT 13563 11 S.F. Projects annexed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 during 1988/89 were: Fiscal Year 1989/90 Projected Expenditures Assessment Admin. 3756 Electric 6000 Overhead 470 Capital Expend. 470 12,696 After review cf current expenditures, projected carryover !$19,0001, projected expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 for fiscal year 1989/90 can be lowered Lo $20.00 The projected carryover will be used to fund this district until assessments are zec eived in January. Pro lected Lights Protected Assessments 3i - 5800 939 x $20,00 = $18,780 2 - 9500 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 $ao ~o $zo $,01 ~ ~ ~ 87188 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year -~ Assessment Rates ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 (COMMERCL4L/INDUSTRIAL) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUDtE, CPfY ENGINEER Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annual Engineer's Report Conmerc ial/Industrial Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report Eor Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division S, of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping ana lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected casts for fiscal year 1988/89 and the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1989/90 to determine the annual assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all areas in the district and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. fi was established Eor Commercial and/ar Industrial properties mainly within the Industrial and Poothill Specific Pian areas. Areas included in the work program are the street lights within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City and are limited to local streets. The work programs excludes maintenance of street lights in rights-of-way of major streets. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the 111umination of the subject area. c«.eer n „n«~ were ~nocrrnrr ed and 1~~«.,n ed by «he develnne~a fa. «he individual projects within the district. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1988/89 Review 88/09 Projected Budget 06/30/89 Asst. Admin 2,012 2,012 E Lectric 4,000 6,012 1,012 Expend ~tur es for fiscal year 1988/89 were low. The tollcwing projects were annexed to SLreeL Lighting Maintenance Di s'tr ict No. 6 dur ing fiscal year 1988/89. ANNEX 13 DR 87-26 62 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 14 DR R7-16 1 ASST . UNIT ANNEX 16 DR 86-43 5 ASST . UNITS ANNEX 16 CUP 87-0/ 7.7 ASST . UNITS DR 86-32 1.2 ASST . UNITS ANNEX 17 DR 87-41 2.56 ASST. UNLTS CUP 87-42 4.54 ASST. UNLTS ANNEX 18 PM 10941 14.58 ASST. UNITS DR 87-62 176 ASST. UNITS CUP 87-19 7.74 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 DR 87-28 8.7 ASST. UNITS DR e7-88 16 ASST. UNITS CUP BS-19 6 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 5, 1988 CUP 87-16 16 ASST. UNITS CUP 87-26 21 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 2, 1988 DR 87-61 nn an..cn 7 ASST. n i n~cm UNITS ~nnm_ ANNEXED DECEMBER 7, 1988 DR 88-IB 8.5 ASST. UNITS PM 10238 9 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED DECEMBER 21, 1988 DR 86-27 12 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED JANUARY 4, 1989 DR 87-17 1.4 ASST. UNITS DR 87-19 II ASST. UNITS DR 87-20 M.DR 88-I9 19 ASST. UNITS w4irEX-nu JAI4UARY lc. i969 DR 87-61 28.69 ASST. UNITS DR 8H-28 8.10 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED FEBRUARY 18, 1989 PM 10981 36.56 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED MAR(71 15, 1989 DR 87-06 21.6 ASST. UNITS DR B8-16 6 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED APRIL 5, 1989 DR 87-44 3 ASST. UNITS DR 87-42 1.28 ASST. UNITS Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Projected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. 2,272 Electric 4,200 Overhead 284 Capital 284 7,040 Projected Revenue 568/units x $20.00 = $11,360 The rate of development and acceptance of street lighting within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 will determine the actual expenditures of energy charges. It has been determined that an assessment rate of $25.00 ems. o~~~~~,,,~,,,..,a„ .,~ .,.,,~. ~,.. Q2a.,,,,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 $26 $25 $24 $23 $22 $21 $20 $19 F ~ ~ r i 88/89 89/90 FlscalYear ----r- Assessment Rates ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 8TREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. d ANNEXATION NO. a ~ ~ M I • • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ MI •1 1 !`~~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECTS TR. /aZ870 i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LICiHTINCi MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a ANNEXATION NO. a~ xi.xuxo A~iwc .~ _ ~~ ,a s~ n .. ~ .° ' n ~r ~- 1 ~° q u _ u ~~ : m e a n , ° ~ ~ -~--J ~. u °~ I ~, ~ ~'~ ' ~'~t .,~ /~ N 9I~l/'r~ 1 ~ ~ I \~ t i i \ ~ ^NI lY ~~~ ~ ~ (~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA N PROJECTS ~, /3'YaS' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIONTINO MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. a.8 • • n r ~ ^ r ~ •~ • A ~~ M w • ^ 1r ' ~ • •s p ^ ~ ~ Y n ^ ^ v r w ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ w F00 MIIL u ~- 2IT i l~~p c Z IlAVYi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR ~9~7~P V, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI(iHTINC3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a ANNEXATION NO. a,~ .aw _!. ~~e:. ~J I i i ~ ~ ~~ ~~r HrYripa~ ~.aca I I s 1 ' I 1 _._,„ 'J ~ .. j `1.' Ian::, ar ~ I ~ I--~ ~ Y a I ~ ~ -- ~ .i.~~m as :I ,L ~ a u as ~ ~ I ,~ ..r.~ 1 _ 1 u m ~a T ~ ~1R1{•tUf ~-n .•,r •u br ti •r ww t~ A i? sa ~ -- is •~~O , Ia r l a~ s I ~a l u / I ,ItI~ I~ i i vT '~ rA•Nr CITY OP ~ANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECTr T~. ~ayoa a 1 _ •~ C ± ~~ r ~ T ~ y~R lMr I .. I11 - c F---1 S :a I i...~..~•r r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI(iHTINa MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a ANNEXATION NO. a 9 I 1 I ~ ~ RIIIr1 YR1 ~___,_ ~ _ ~... * ~ li ~ 1 .. ,. 11 ~ _~- I 1 _ - i 11 I II~ ~ H l ' ~ 11 ~ 4 L~ 11 11 11 q• ~~ '-- _ - - --•- i y~nua... 'a' I ..RI ~ :•. ~ -Lto- .. J~~1~ II lY I I `~~ C ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR . 13 6 `f y V 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DtBTRICT NO. d ANNEXATION NO. 3r) . t7 19 t9 20 21 22 23 2• 2ti 2E 2) 30 29 ~ 30 ._1 IOI9' E 'jbl 6 31 ,_ ~ i6 15 11 1~ t2 II 4 32 J" .~s 3 Z 3• ='• JS I --~I t letusloc Iwo ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: lR• 1a~5~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTIN(i MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 30 ~ y' n l ~' j ~' 1 `' I,~I,:~ a, ~„I,ol ~ I :61 •I I~~I '" 23 24 25 26'~ 27 ZO 29 3C 3~ 32 ~;S 33 ~~ 3~ - ,~ ~e ~5 s~ ~ s 2z 2~ zo ~9 IIB 3e I] 9 ~0 B 12 ~ 1 . .... - ' 2 .I 5 , 3 6 x~us~ot Sao ~~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECTS TR. /a 610 - y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a. ANNEXATION NO. 30 I I 2 I I I 'r ~ ~. r~ +. ' i ~ i ,~ b r1 1- .~'-Il~nu I ~~~ c N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECTi %R, /~9/3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. d. ANNEXATION NO. 30 r +~ ~ II I• i f! JO al i ~~ I ? N if lI r N r f t! ~' Jf s • ~ ~ ~ : ~ s " n N ,d N n ~a• -_ - ~~ (~Q C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTi TR. 1369 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINC MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 30 ~~~ ~. ~~- 1 ~~~• ~1 . ~~ ~ i 1 i .1 ' 1 O .. I I i w I . n I' j ~N11~.~ i .~ I u I ~~'~ r p 7 11 ~ 1 I I lY ~~ C {7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTI ?F~. /3 7~{ 2. ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ''i !~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANGE DISTRICT NO. ~. ANNEXATION NO. 31 ill ~ l I i "n-r~ ~ ; _~-'' ~-,"~~'`--- III l ... ~ .. ~- 7' ..~ -- .'1--~ ~: --'r, ..i7`" ., "' _ _- I it 1 ".if' ~`'~' ~ ._ ~.. ' ~I '. .y ~'V 1 ~~ {r, 1' 1 'Y~~ l 1. 1 ~~ I •. Ir, .. ; ~. i; it I,:~ a";:~,t ~ .j::.., ~~~ I I ~i~ . ~.ti <.. •.~~. ~II~ ~~ ~I ~ I I. i~ ~! ~~ ~P Q CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: 1 K I ,?31 b' ~ ~ I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~~ L; STREET LIGHTING AAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. a. ANNEXATION 9/a i%~,~' j ~ i I~ I~ ~I _ ~~ i. ~" ~ ' '~ I I~' ; , i' ~ . ~ I ~~ .~ i I I i it ~A e t /1 f i ~ I. I t ~I ~ °'. ~i rI ~r I II L! II i P . I. NIONUNO ~µ1YYt ~ RI l~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~~ PROJECT: ~i~ 137H3'~ /33'47 136'0~~ V' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. %S I ~ i ANNEXATION ;'~i J~B~ I ~; fl! -,. ~ '~ I ~ ~~ ~, ~ w ~~' J =. ~.~. M ~ ~~ ~ ~ " r / Ali I ~, rrrnAuj nrr~~C.. Q i~ I; l I j' ~I !, i 'I ~~~ ~ i Ii I~~ ~S ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ~ pROJECT~ Ti,', l.Z b 5 y-/ VV 11 f ~~ - - - _ - l ~ j ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I j 3TREET LIQHTIN(i MAINTENANCE QI3TRICT NO. -~ ~ ANNEXATION /!%,/iq~b'8 !I ~j' II I~ ~I II 1 Y~+ ~ ` ~ ~ It ~ ~ Y ~ 11 A !~ ^ ~~ Y ,~ 3i ~ ~. ~ _ R ~~ i _ u ~ s • r 7 1 1 i~i. 11 1'~ '~ ~ a r r ~I II rr i ~ HI <trv w+.n _ I- i r it ' ~ I ~I 1, ~ , , it i ~i ~~c~ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~ ----- PROJECT, I~., Ljq,~ ~' I 1 _\ ASSESSMENT DIAtaRAM STREET LIOHTINa MAINTENANCE DIST RICT NO. ~ i ANNEXATION ///ie,~ fig' ij I ~~ ~d a~ ,~• c -f, ' I iti3~s~'_ I ~ -,r I I I~ ~, !i rry1~ it I ~ I~ 3 ~ i I a ~ E 13 a ~ I ' ~ : ~ n Y G I~ ~ _~~ ~ A _ .1 Ir~~ I •l I! ~ ~~ ~ i , I ~~ aI ~~ ~ MM~ ~ i ' ~ ~~ I ~ ;~ y ~! ~ i ~ ~ ~! 1 l I ~ ' ~~:r~ m`~:. t.T~ ~ \ ~ ~7L'4L~SrV^ .I ,i. .~~ III ~7 ~ t it i ~ e _ _-. _ _ ~ i ~8P ~ _ I y'7fdf ~ ~ • ~- 'I .L' I ~ .. ~ Y ~ ~~3.. ~ ~ -3/ *1~.~ ~ I III, ~I l Ili I li u ~~~ ~~ U I i l i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA PROJECTi (~ l~. 10')83 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTIN(3 MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. ,~ ANNEXATION /i~i~/a'a- ~Oaa~iiNCr'~ ~- ~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM `~i ~ ~~ ~ STREET LIQHTINQ MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~ III ANNEXATION /~/7~P~' li ~I .vwllieta~rw I/tNr j ~ III i i ~"~~.... I I i ~_~ wG AlA'Mltt l a :Q7 i Ili I, i ~ k I I ~' _' ' i If 1 1 O f~ p q ~ II ~ i '~ I :ytgscr MGR ~•~r 7r~ 17 ~ Ir ~I Ill .. ., 1 ~' v i l ~ • f 1 p 1 r I © ~ I•o 1 r , ~ I aV i (r I :Ci A ~ I~f i- j I ~, ,~..4 r. I I ~ 7+tnt7 ~~,, W1 ~I ~~ I I/Yf •YV I ~ ~I I I'I L Y ~~ r~~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA I i PROJECT: Ali. 13~N3. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~. ANNEXATION ;~/~~/5'S' PROJECT: .~K /.YSy~-_1_ 6 ~: ii sw(x` CITY OF !~~HO CUCAMON~A ' ASSESSMENT' DIAGRAM ~ ~ ~ ~ STREET LIdHTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION ~ /y/84 II I~ l II I! I~ '' ~' !~ ~ ~ ~lsyy. una~ !I I I e ~i ! ~ ( i . i'fi1f. it i y; ~1 ~ : ~ ~~ ~~ i~R116. I ~ ~1~ .° i ~ t f 1.,. i ~~ •~I j ~J ~~ it ~ smx4 l t y 4 ~ ~ 1 e ~ ~ ~ w , . ~ I I N 1. ~ ?, ~ `~ ~ .I ` y ' 4 l I ~~II ~~~i~ ~h~ : il, ~ ~ ~y......~.. ~~ -` LY Y I i ~i M: 1 `^ I III I ~ ' N, I 1IY J ~~ ~ y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA T R, 50ln3 PROJEC ~ / / ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIQHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. .~- ANNEXAT[ON //'y~S~ ~I"'i~~~ 1 /~~ c ~ CITY OF RAkCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: /R. /.733.-~ ~l1 t r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE a13TRICT NO. ~ 1y, ANNEXATION ~ ~~~~9 ~t=Ne F ~i ACGR ART %~~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: ~ ~,'~', /,28`~S~ i ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 STREET LI(3HTINC3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. v. ANNEXATION H~S~~'s ! I ill ~~ ~~ YK JbfAA -_ .~~.~ ~~~ ~ i i ~ ii ~~ I ~~ ~ i Ij • II li + I ~~ r w I~ ii ~ ~ l I . ~'. a • ~ I ~ r ~/ ~ . ~ i ~ a r y r I, I' ~ I ~ « ~~ III A / ,• M ~illl Y/M/ ~/ III i I I ~I ~^ I~ I I~ I~ I w f y l~ L N I ~' ~~~ ~,~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TK ~IGOG'~ --- - - I, ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I ~; STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NA. ~. ~~ I ANNEXATION ~/~~/fy j ~ ~/~lo~a ~rau~p~ ~I _ ~• h~~~ ~w :. ~'_f ~ III' I' i '~, ~f,:lr 1 III ~~I _ ._^~F~ I! j iti s ,.' mss= 'G ~ • „ ` 1r: ~ 'I j ~ ~ - ~_ 'II '. ~ rn i, e _ ~ , _ , '~ ~ ~ ~I III r ~ _ + -. III I ~ 1- '~ m, i ~>~~.~ ~ ~ ~J '' ~ -,~_- z ~ . ~ ~ I ~~' i 1 ~ i ~ .. tt~~~~ ~ ~ ~'~V I ~ ~~' i ~ ` ~ ~ ~~I I I ~i ,~ i i I ~ , ~ I i ~ i~ L_ _ _ I ~,T YI • tl~`1~ I' l `~~~C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTi I(e. /.jYa.~ ~/' --'--- -- - -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1I STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION y~~/85 i~ i~ l Ii I it m. Nn- -»~a2.2 ~~ ~~ ~ 1~ 10 19 17 i• 19 20 21 2R IJ 10 ~' 21 I IJ 1c 11 l0 9 s 7 e e l f ~ 2 ~ II ~l l it 'I ~' II I I, i' ~I I~ lY ~ C/ III ~ r ~ ~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA i ~ PROJECT: T, /y p"y,~ -3 V 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION y~3/6'1 'RACT~ yy 4d. 135:x•3 ~ a+ ee ea ,~ ,~~' 1 a a • e e r , e2 1- /1 e, •eo +s 11 r I• la la 11 to s e II f ~~~ •~! ~~I~II IQII~f V~IZI lflm/ I •4 - +a IT 41 ~ ~ 1 Za a~ ~ as al I ~ ~ ~ ~ II II ~ ~ ~ x \ ~ a4 JJ ~ ~ 1 >t 7/ i / ~~._ I `~~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONAA PROJECT: IJR . /36 ~~` V 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION - 'i x~~~-y m _.. : /, `~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ASSESSME~V7 DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION --_-- ~---- :.~4~ n.-- //~s~y5 ~° i i~ a nwwrw ~ ~ Y Y Y 4 11 Y~ ~; Y~ Y Y~3] Y II ~ ~ Y Y ~ q' '• 4 U{ 4 ~ Y 4 •4 4 4 ~ W w'a ,• 'll } I I r 1~ 1~ 1 4 M Y Y iI~ , • ", 4 ~ „ I, / 4t i Y u 4 u 1 :;I~ ~ ~~ - r-- I`~~ ~ ~ Ct7Y OF pANCNO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: ~ %K /,j?,~ 3 i~ r a. ASSESSMEFlT DIAGRAM STREET LIdHTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION ~ lis~~a~ ,:, ~; - ------- si d ~^ `14 • If e f f f. /If,f f /.f~f:1 1 f ii ',"~~~ -' f 1 I I ~ .~ +rs. uw +Iwer w !! • i• ~ i i i 1. i i i ~ i'~~ i'• r-' a~ f f I l f I i i i 1 i i e ~ i '• I ~ i i! ~ i / w~ f ~ 1 ~I !I~ • 1• 1 ~ i i i ill E l i l 1~•I i ., i I i,1 l i • }1 I~ .li ~ i ... • • • r • Y u~xw • • e i~Yj I • • • • • i s I t I • . • 1 I . i ~ • ~• • ~ u~ I 1 • li• • 1 • • • • • • • JI•II Y•~•~ Y> 1 1 ~_~~1J1~~ ~~~ ~ _~ 1IX ~`~ ~ ~ ~- In. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt•IONOA I ' I,~ PROJECT: `,~ /3 ~ B/ Y1 i i, ~ l ~I ~' ii i~ Ii ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING AAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 9 wf~.R. 3 ~.I ~ i ~ ~ ~I I ~'; I, i' 3 :~ , ~ ~~~~ y p i / ~`.~ ~ , 4 'A ~ ~, 2 ~~ ~~ i. T.~.~~~I: 4.~ ~ '-a .rn r Z f3A JEl.fNt KOAD jl iI~ _~_ ~~ ~~~P CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA - -- PROJECTa R m. 9 3 5O -- - ---- - - - _ . I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 8 ~- VALlNCtw .a7'/ s - IWI z ~~ W ~ ~ TEV ~~ 'ETA t..... ,so. Z ~l WL J gar ~ i SAtle LINE Y®AD Iyy / LIB (~~~)~ VI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: FN /7'l 9J 0 ~/ i ~( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ,i STREET LiQHTIN© MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~/ ANNEXATION 9~~i /s8 i jl ^~ i~ e.. .. ~I li, i ~ ~~`~el ~m~L (fRIRI ~ i y ~. ~ f ~ , ~ ~ '~~~ 1 i ~ ~ • i ~. , -.. ~ . C ~ r ~-y 'I ' le 1 ~,y,.1y`1\ '1 `c~-1 ~ (/' 1 1 .. J ~ 1 9 ~j Y ~ ?7 • dA ie ~--•-i--.! , .s 1119 ~i~r r;u+~u~%di iY~ ~I,-;1~~' _ - _ I i ~I I~ I I i N, M i I~~~s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA i PROJECTi ~, l3a ~O ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE D13TRIOT NO. ~ ANNEXATION 9/s ~~~~ ~~ ~_ i" ~ \ li - ~/ -.:.,•~ _' _ -_ ~-7~ ~~ v ~ y.- S~ ,,` ;\\ ~ ~ ~ ~I. ' .~ ~ y ~~,.. is .~ .f,+,l 1 ~\ ~i,i~ '; ~ J V ~ \ __ __ _ _ _ is ~' ::~'( ---~f +' 1 ~~~ 1~~~T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT: -TR. /3,17,j ASBESSAAENT DIAGRAM ~~'~ ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ti 'i i ANNEXATION 9 ~ 9 'I i i'i ___~_~ I ~•--r~-Y.__ _ ~__ ~ j ...__. _ _ __ ` i -L..._ _ ~_r_ __ II y /G~ 2___~r~ Qom- I __ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i ,. • -' ~ ` v •' ~ ' ~ t~ L /°~~ •,te41f / I. ~I I i I I i'I I~~ ~ U I~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: PiYJ 9d'97 ~l1 __- _._-'_ __ 1. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIf3HTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~`/ ANNEXATION ;o/;=,/~e ~~ :fs y~~,~ sa...'y.i ~~ .. i--~ \ 1 ~~! ~ f~ ~_ ,~~. `~ __ .may./}/j/^TY/~~, {r~`)~~'-v~1`A~v ~~~.. ~ 1 `^\~ 1, T ~ ` ~~~~ ~V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: h'~;. 119{/ ~, ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~j STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. y ~~ ANNEXATION ,3/i~~9 i. II ii '~,' - i I ~' . ~ +' ~ ~ •~ • . ~~ f, .. ..;..~ ...... ~ Iii _ ~~,~.~. !I I~I ~~~~~ ~ ~ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: 7R /y/SG ___ -- --- __ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIdHTINd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 'J/ ANNEXATION ~~~ ~u^y '6 ___ __*TDQIITI ..,, ~t~t~l,l~q 1~1-~S~f'~~~ ~~~~x CiTV OF RANCHO CUCAMONC~A PROJECT: N 111. /l030 ~rtLt':' fl II Yf.T~,~ .i IA ~- -- ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S ANNEXATION NO. ~ i i i ~ ~ __~ _~ ~ .~ ~ f M I •-..r.-•--mow-~ ~ fl t~N gNUMq~N f la tM >yti9 Mf>•tn f> _~~ ~ ~i ~ - ~a ~t M ~ >• >A ~ ~ ~ l ~T~°= ~' it ~, ~ ~'' ~. ~; ~~ ;' ~~~ ~c ~ Ili CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTi ~7 f4. ~ 3 ~ ~~ l -- - ~ _. - l -__ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S III ANNEXATION NO. .3 i j ii ~~ ~' ij ""_'''^, - - ~ Esc T- 'i n u u~ a! a n ~ • av. z~ s >o ,I _'"°""'_„'~ y r ~ 1. . i i; a !~ ~~ o u !! ~~ .~~- I ~ a I a •y ~ a„ ~ ./' ~ ~~~. Y A ~ III p N 3 ~ N 'l~~ r: ! 1 ray i _ I Od M Y ~ ~I I I i it ~ III I~ i'l I~~ Et CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA PROJECT: T ~.jSJS- V 1 I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ i ANNEXATION NO. ~ ii ~ ~~ i ,..... a ~ a ` , t .., , u tt to t~Y w a u t~ ~ l 1 ' ~ ~~~~~~__ s u it `~ ~ a 37 t~ at i n ,~ ~ ~ ~ „ n a H pl .Y I~ ~_ A M~~ ~ ~I~ rtT(y--- III !, i ~ ~; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: T/1. ~35J(~ ~/1 i i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I'~ ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. .5 '~ l ANNEXATION NO. _3 i~ I I )JI ~_ ~~~ 11 ~ r • ~ ' + :~ 1 ~; ~ u n u u '/ +~ 11 n M i ~ n ~' 'I y >w a n„ a w ill ~ to M Y it l~~. ~ ~~~ ~ II l!Ij s 1s s1 n at >. _ .~~ ~ ~ I ~ ' w O it y N 11 q 1i M ..~ •I~ l ill it Yh i i i, 1~(P t~s i! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTS r,(~ /,j5 5X I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S i ANNEXATION NO. 3 ~I ~ I~ 'I s , ' ' l ail ~.~ ///''' ~ • • M~~ ~ i i. , ill ~~ l .. ~~ '~i .~ .. II !~ !~I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA III PROJECT: JR /356D ~I - ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET SIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRIGT NO. S ~~ ~, ANNEXATION NO. 3 I ~~~ ~i 'i ~'~ ~ . hill ~ a 1 ~' ~ ;I i ~~ y 1 7t Y 11 a 11 M ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ la >r • ~Iaa>nsaa a u ~y_--~..~. j :r I s `~ a vanaaalar III +~ I ~I, "_'__- i i i I, I ~I { ; j~: ~~~ ~~_ ~, CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONt~A , ~! PROJECT: "TK / ~Sv.:3 I~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Ii STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 13 I ~ ~+.Oir rou rf T _ _ _ _~.. .... w ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. :r ',' .:.f. I.I I ... lj is 4 .f ~~ ~ ~~~s;~' i ~ ~ .,.. ~ I --~ ..••..~,~. el ,., t~ ~ ~ i ~ ,. , :7r7 , ... n ~ i III ~ . ~~''~r~~~~~~'~ sir , Ji r~.,..\ i . _ i iyl~__ ,~ ._ .___. _,.. __ ~ ~ I • ai . _ J i ;r !I - ~, ~1 c ' Q~ } it ~[" ." _ •. ~!'•.': F~SV .t 1 _ ,~ ~ .~1... ~. F' I n r.r "~~11~ ~ i V~ I ./•'~III 1 CITY OF RANCHO CLdCAMON(~A PROJECT: l) R. b ~'~1 ~ P/r) ~p /y,~` ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM \I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. / N ~~ ~ it I I! SITE Yao?Ni1.L N. Y I~ I nkD ii ~ ,~ i rrr~ww ~~!I,li 'raw... um+fa.,~w, ~ f wxr wu -^ `1Ww~r1~ ~ ~ W nkD ill __ MIIOW NW. ill i ~~ ii LY Iii /~-I-~ t ~ 'i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONIiA ,_ ~ ~~ PROJECT: (~ ~ Y 7 i ~ - i '~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM -" STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. ;S I ~I ij it ~~ i~ II l I ~I I' ,Ili ~I~ II I I~ ~~ ,I!I ~ ' I' ~ i i i i ~, ~~ i /~~ ~ Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: O R. 8~' H3 li -?~• 1k. it1 I,. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM i ~ STREET LIGHTINr, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. G, ANNEXATION NO. /~; ~ I ~' II 1CU~ 1)~Ok) ~,~ /"~~ r i I~ li LE !M. e }'~, ~~ ~ 1 I' ;• ~, ~° .~~ :.: 1,: -: ;. ;~... wsw~ w ,~~aw~s +w wntt 1 = •.n ~LrA t ~'' I bl ~* ~ ~~ N14MlAM0 ~M[W(~_~~w ~ ti I ~ ~~~ G~ ~I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA i ~ PROJECT: (~.. (J ~ ~Y7- ~ `/ :; ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. C ANNEXATION NO. i ~. z I~~ ~S (, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA ~1 PROJECTS D h' &L~;j~ :~ ~i II ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGiiTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. / 7 I j ~I ~I --- • ~«_»,•- --- -S+"" ill SITfi „+' -~ ~ ~ i i F + ~ ii ~ _ B:fi;:. ~ ~ .rw + ~ z ~ ii ~ ~ ~ i y,, ;Ilil ~ ~~ ww ~ f ~ ~~ ill' N_ LY ''I `~~ t T I Ii I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ~ ~ PROJECT: l! ~' N ~ 7- N2. i I - --- j~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. y ~ ANNEXATION NO. / ~~ i ~I ~ ~ l _ ~, , ARROW NWY. e ilk i II it 6077 i w ~~ < j _, I`u ~ I ~1 '( ~ lh ~~ ,JERSlY ~ ~_ ~ I I' ~I I I II _ I~ ICI I I ~`~ ~ t U I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA CT: k'I yl ~i PROJE (i lti ,~ --- 'r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. C: ~ i ANNEXATION NO. 1 ~ I~ I 1 : ~i w ~~ a 9 W t W m a ~ I U ~ ~ ~ ~~ < Q ~ I it ~I' ~.. ».we i I i j Q µ S+- J Y 'III Sh. w 4pSt , - --- ___ I_ 1. ~ t a ~~, I®~ w . ,~ L ,~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~' ~I PROJECT: f' !!) l d `J h~~ -- ASSESSMENT DfAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ i~ ff ~'I I ~~ ~I ANNEXATION NO. i y /~~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: j-j /~' S-'/-5.~ u. ~r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ~ ANNEXATION 9~a~~5=K ~w ~~ .,~.. .~,.. ~~ i~~ ~ x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA r l~ ~i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI~HTIN(i MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION y~!,~~~`~' -s ~'- ~ r-~ it ° f ~ 1 1 ~i it ~:I i ~ ~ 1 rl=~ a '~l w I 1214 1 1 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~;; r ~ tl - \ Y• I .. „f ~~i-~~ _ L-IYL ',~~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~`~~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: /~ {; ~' 7- JS ' I~ I AS3E3SMEN1' DIAGRAM 1 i BTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. E ANNEXATION 9j ~ %~ ~6' i ~I ~'~ ., I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ru .u,• . ~q~, ~ ..(,y. _ ~I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I i ra ! ra rm ra roo W +a +r +o+ it (3i© v G G v C') v~' I I,I' ~~ , ~ _...... I ~I~ ~~ 1. ..~- .: ~ o Z ~ S ~ . ~ I'I, ~i lY +~ ~; i~~ ~z ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA li ~ PROJECT: G. U P. ~~ "~~ I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION ~c~,~yy ,-~„~ ..~ ,---1 I - ii ,i ~ _ _ ICY '~ lip ~ ~ ~ a.tl ~ ,,,~ >> ~; I! I I ~ ..• ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~ /~ ~ CITY OF RANCFIO CUCAMONOA PROJECT; C ~~ h' ~f%-i6 V 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ STREET LIt3NTIN4 MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. 6 III ANNEXATION ~,~/~.%~~' I' I _~,~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ _-__ ~. `1 ... ~_ ~~ I~I I ~ ;~~.Ir -1 I ~ i I~ .~lii~ 11111 ' III ~~ ~I~~'I' ~~ ~ r ul I III '~~ I ~ ~ ,d "' 11"1 III I ~, i ~ 1' ~ I I I ij \~ I~ L 1 I ~1~' I 11 ~I i _--~-I . ~ ~ :, ; ! I o ~4tH0 _ ~ I ill ~~ ~~ -~ ~I'~ i I II ~ - ~ i I III _ ,1 ~, ~ 1 111 i'I. I II II ~ ~1 r.m.m S I ~ ~ I ~ I ~_ I I it • ~ (I I I NI I ~ lY III I (~~ ~-~ ~ it CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONOA PROJECTS C; L I. P ~ ~".~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ^l BTREET LIaHTINQ AAAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION !/~a /fr Y ~I s'^ srpffr i , ~ f 1 < ~, i. i I i~ I ~ I ,' s ', ~ -~ iil k y t ii ~ ._ .. I~ I~ I ~ ~~ S/Tf 11 Irt~ ~~ ~" ~ ~ Y I ~I FuTURf B'JILO/NO L..- -- IoI II i ~ ~ ~I ~~ ~, i'~ I i ~, ~~ ~ c ~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~ / ~!1 If I PROJECT: D X. ~ ~ ~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM _i j ~ STREET LIf3HTINfi IriAINTENANCE DISTRICT Np. 6 ~~~ ANNEJCATION /i~~~~~ ~' ~I ~~ I' I i, ~' i I i I jl j I i~ it I~ ~I III I ~~ ;i ~I it I I I ~~ { I ~ II ~~~ ~~ i ~ ~~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONQA 'I PROJECT: 1~ R h 9-~~ (l' J A rrcv I I : II ' ~ I ' ~ ~i l ATBSFRR iO ~ ~ v v ~ ` = a 6th LJ '1 ~ I I j~y~^~~ ~ {~ Y Iii I-! 0 Fwy u I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION !a ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ,~j ~II~ ~o...r Ih J w..V.V. ~! I I Y ~~ ~ ` ', ai w `r~ I ~~..e~ ~~ wv•a.r aw~r:J :gyp iti --•----- II w..~.u ~ ~ Qro~ecl- ql ~-.`~~~~~ 1 n~ 1 glTC. ' .....-. , .Ji~~~ I ~,. __._ \1_..t..~li.~i ~ .~ ~1 , ~~ _ ~ ~~ ~ """°"; ; "'III 1 v ` ` ., ~ } ~~i~f ~~ ~I,Ii~ ~ ; ~ .. ;: ,k ,~I ! i! ~ ,~ i~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONQA PROJECTS Q /~, ~'~'-/~ V 1 r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION is/~ ~~- l ~ ~ ICI 'li m, ~ i r !Ii ~ ~~ ~~i ~~ ~~ 3/1N pE11NP.gO1N0 AvE. ~i r N ~~ Z Q !I /~/ v` 3I II i Y v ~I " I ~I ~ I~ I _ ~f! ... - FOOTHILL Ol.VO. ~ l~ ~ II ~!~ ~l „I LI ~ `~~ F r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMOA ~~ III PROJECT: ?/y1. /~~3,~ ~\ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING b9AINTENANGE DISTRICT NO. ~ i ANNEXATION %~ /a i~~8 ii -~.-..~-.--z ~ ~ I I ---_-°--~~- ~, III I p.. :.a iu aoa~ s.oa ecr ih I 4 '~ +D ~ sir[ ?'d: ~ I3 ~ ~ .a. i~ I ~ ~ ~ © I ~ D[v®tG/~D „~ ~ ~ ~ ° "` a ~ i II; ~ 3 I i I d i~t,~~' ~Nr e Ili ~ ~ I~ _ . _ ~~ I~ w ~~P ~ ~- i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ~~ PROJECT: (~.,Q, ~~-~7 ~' ASSESSMENT DIAGR~~M l~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D13TRi: T NO. ~ I ~ ANNEXATION //y/~9 ~I I I ,..~.e., ~ i ii '~ ~~= - ~ T l -y• 1 •~ ` ` I ~ ! • \ ~`' ... . it .I „ ~ ~I ply' '~ s~ i ~ t ~, I ~ ~~ ~~ ~- ~. ~' ~, .. ~ r ~~ V ~1 Y ~\A~ ~i ' ~ I '~i ~ , ,,. .. I ~~~~; r-rc II I~~ F~ CITY 6F RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECTa C) k. 1'%-/ J I/ II ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LI(3HTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. G, ~' i ~~. ..~ ~~~ F ,_ ANNEXATION ~~y~~~~ --,--rn~\ . _a~ l ,. ~~~ ~~ .~. -- ~~~ I ~ J~l.~i~! ~~ __.~_ ~ ~~ ~ ~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECTS !). k, ~%-/y ti 8 ~ dd i ((~ l~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 STRE ET LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION ~ /~ ~~~ i II~ ~ j i ~ ,foothll blvd. L ~ I z ~ ~ _ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ° ~e _ ~ I'~ E ~ ~ si~a ^ ` location ~o~f5 A.arrv.srr. arrow route Rc.u~• 9710 ~ ~II ° 1 ~ ~ i L--1, _U ~ ' « sr>t® fit. a ~.t. ~ ~l.f. railrOtad Y II~ r~~ ~S II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON9A I PROJECT: i>I~li R. 8Y-~y ASSESSMENT DIAraRAM 3THEET LI(3HTINO MAINTENANCE D13TR1CT NO. G ANNEXATION i~i&j~9 ...~1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM BTREET LIQHTINGf MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION ~;-;~-~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~' ~ it i'I 3TREE7 LIdHTiNd MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ i! ANNEXATION 3~isl~y ~ I~ j !I !'~' ~. !; ,i !' I', i ARROW ROUTE ' i w ~ Ii i~ a JERSEY BLVD. li :I~ ~i roa~~ ~ ~ - ^ I ~I! i a l~ - Ii = 6TH STREET i III .., I i i ~ j. !-1Q ~ ' ~~ i~ I NN~ ,~ N (`~~ ~ J I~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~J~ PROJECT: D k ,5 )_Q ~ V 1 -- -- -._, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ~~ ANNEXATION 3~i~~~y ~~ ~~ it ~~ ii I i~ ~~,~'~'~~__~, r~1«~ ~ .1 ~ 1 ~ -, t ~Q~.' ~ :: .. ,; ~ .a~,~ f ~; ~I '~300t70tltlP . I f~ I~ ! !i I„ ~~ ~ ~ (! CITY OF R~NCHO GUCAMONQA ~I PROJECT: Ci f~. k8-llo ___ __ ___ ~/, l ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 ~~ ~ 3TREE7 LIOHTINQ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~, ~' ANNEXATION y~,-~~=~ I~ II ~ ~~_ civic cen-rex o ave ! ~ ~..~ i ~ I ~ -------- - _ ~I ~I I. ~ ` °~ ~ ~ ~'li ~ I I ...ter - ~ -I--l~ II i' •: ~ry~w ~~ ~ ~I ~I it ~ ( l i ._ ~ • n 'i i _ ~ I, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA i PROJECT: Q /~ b`7- `/~ J - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. RECOMMENDATION: It is reconmended that City Council hold the Public Hearing, and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing the assessment rates for Landseape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5 and 6 for Fiscal Year 1989/90. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must approve an Annual Engineer's Report wRich reviews the status of each Afatrirt ann projects revenue and expenditures to establish the rate of assessment for each district for the next Ftacal Year. The rate for 1989/90 will remain at the current rate for all districts except Landscape Maintenance District No. 3-B IColmlercial/Industrial). This district is assessed on an acreage basis and projected costs of median maintenance. Maintenance costs on Haven mefl ians are higher than originally projected therefore necessitating an increase in the rate. Following is a summary of 1986/87. 1987/88, 1988/89 and 1989/90 assessment rates for each of the landscape Qistric ta. 86/87 87/88 8_81 84 89 90 L.M.D. N1 IGen. Cityl 28.00 25.50 25.00 25.00 L,M.D. N2 (Victoria) 273.77 195.00 195.00 195.00 L.M.D. N3 IA - Hyssop) 258.75 258.75 258.75 258.75 IB - Medians) -0- -0- 45.00 770.00 City Council Staff Report LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1-6 June 21, 1989 Page 2 86/87 L.M.D. #4 (Terra Vistal 128.34 L.M.D. #5 (Tot Lot) 113.41 L.M.D. #6 (Carynl -0- 87/88 BB/89 89/90 105.00 105.00 105.00 111.00 105.00 105.00 195.00 195.00 145.00 spectful//l(~y submitted, ~//J 1J• YDY74rK. erry Fulwood Deputy City Manager Attachments: Resolution Engineer's Reports ~~7 ~ RESOLUTION NO. ~~' ~ q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ^vOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A , 38, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5 AND 6. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of May, 1989, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 89-230 to order the therein described work in connection with Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, and 6 which Resolution of Intention No. 89-230 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for tha contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired lunsdiction to order the proposed work, SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5 and 6 for the Fiscal Year 1989/90, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-230, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1988!89 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. 1~7~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITE FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: A39E99MENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CPI'Y ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 I General City Parkways G Equestrian Trailsl Fiscal Year 1989/90 The 1989/90 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General Cityl is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 5 nE t*.^ Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. Projected operations and me intenance costs for Fiscal Years 1988/89 and 1989/90 are provided in this report, Projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to furnish the highest quality landscaping at the lowest possible assessment rate. Assessments are used to furnish services and materials for maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and equestrian trails within the district. mhe maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District Nc. 1 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of parkways and equestrian trails include repair of irr lgation ....,...,,m,. .,.m..~ ,.. «e _ ... .. ,~,..n.p..g...,,, _~___..._. _..... .._ ._ _.,....ce~, .... .. .. .. .. ... .. .......... ... ...~ .~,. The maintenance also includes providing Eor the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. Trimni ng, spraying, fertilizing and/or treating Eor disease or injury as well as removal aE tr innings, rubbish or debris are part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls inanediately adjacent to parkways are repaired and kept free of graffiti as part of the maintenance process. Capital improvements within Landscape Maintenance Distrlet No. 1 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1988/89 Review General City Camplat ion of the Archibald Entry Monuments was accomplished during 1988/89. An additional $4,000 was budgeted for the Contingency Tree Replacement Account bringing the total amount available to $5,000. Moisture sensors were installed in various parkways to conserve water. Additional Eunds will be budgeted in future years to allow more moisture sensor installations. As of Projected 88/89 Budget 03/31 89 6/30/89 Assmt. Admin. 29,516.00 29,516.00 29,516.00 Ma int./Over. 2,000.00 2,429.47 3,644,16 yeh. Maint./Cper. 6,466.00 -0- 6,466.00 "Contig./Trees 4,000.00 -0- 40,000.00 Contract Serv. 39,392.00 31,877.48 47,820.00 ""Tree Maint./Contract Adm. 16,425.00 -0- 16,415.00 Capital Expend. 20,000.00 -0- 20,000,00 Water 35,000.00 10,739.06 11,116.00 Electric 5,000.00 2,926.25 4,392.00 Entry Monuments -0- 45,421.35 45,411,35 157,799.00 121x909.63 234,800.51 "The contingency account Eor trees was established by City Council tc provide funds for tree replacements required due to a major storm or disaster. Currently there is $5,000 ($1000 from 87/68 and $4,000 from oo(u ~. ___., .^~ a,~n;f innal fnnd¢ in tha amount of 55,000 are budgeted, dux ing fiscal year 1969/90. ""No direct payroll charges in the budget, City personnel time will be qa id from this acccunt. During the current fiscal year the fallowing tracts idiagrams attached! were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Landscape District I - Annexations For 1989-90 ANNEX 43 DR 67-11 5 ASST. UNITS h1Yry GX y TRACT 12870 67 S.F. ANNEX 46 TRACT 17425 71 S.F. ANNEX 46 TRACF 13476 37 S.F. TRACT 12902 29 S.P, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Dt3TRICT N0..1 ANNEXATION io _s-88' I i a ~ u r + r -~._ pf _.c~.._ f~ I y J U~ Ll '~ } u ryl i w r 1. / ^ 1 0 t ~! t r .. ~w^~ ~ ~ _ . 3. .KGf, ' I . ~ IJ ~ tl ~1 C~,~O } ~ r i ti r S ,•_ r • ~~ ',f r n ,~. i I u ~ •'i D ~ p { r 11 W~ .I, ~ ~Y ~ cif • ~ r ~~° w ~+O 1~' n 'r.• L\!~Q ~7 J i .... i /., -- - , r k ~ L t~ i ~Jr .' + f` a' ``.~ ~« \' it +y , ;} ~i .~ II ~! ~jT ~~~ i~ l1 '~ II CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONOA i PROJECT: TR, &583 ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION io-s-88 I I ~~i II ~~ •\ I w' r I - -~~ i ~ 1` w r »~~n w ' ~ III V r l! I I ~~+~+~M~»~~~.~,n.f~.I n~ I ~ ~I I I I ~i I ~ ~!~ I ~, ~i I ~~ (`~7y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: TA. /d ~ 59 -l ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. Z ANNEXATION ic- i9-8S ~. ~ ~ ~ Y • ~~ • • I ~ • ~ • 1~ N ~ 11 Y N 'Y N ~ r ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ Y a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I-++ r t~l 1`~7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: rR. l 3 '7.~ 8 ~l ~ - -:Y~-... --- -_ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ' LANDSCAPE MlaN (ENANCE DISTRICT Np. L i ANNt~ATION 1,-a-~~ ~ ~! ~~ '~ ~ / ~ I ~Ii ~jO' ~ Y ~ I 1 f ~S1'y ar+ r I n' it Y T Y Y I ~,~~1 ~ N III ~~~ N ---~ 1 N 1 N~i Y it I ~ ~ ~~ ' Y i I~ III ` i ~ ,J}.. y~~ ~t$a '~ 1iv `~ i r Y r r Y ~ ili ~I 0 ~'j~ II N n Y I .~ Y ~• r~ ~ ! ! I yp1a181 ~. • r ~ u ~ ~' ~ YrYII• Y M w 11 ~~ Y r I Y n w ~~~ it u "' ~ u ~ i w w ~ in ~ w r ` •1~pNY MILL ~elIN4~ f`~^/ Y /V .~1 '~7 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA I -_ PROJECT: TR. 13650 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNEXATION ll- i6- 88 ICI ~ ul ~~,1 j i~ it ~I W r+~ ! ~.~.~ nuctt z ~,.~ I~C~L I ssT\ ..• r~ I 1° i it I_ t ~,~ '~: ': er' ^.'F.•. ~, ~..sw ~~-~A.~ CITY OF ^~NCNO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: /~/rt. /n783 i j... Ltd" ~~ ~I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ ANNEXATION 11-ib-s3 I I~ ~~~ ._1 ~, ~ ~w0 R.C.N. i~ I~ ~~--~- - ~ ~~ ~ ~ I MIMRrVdG I4I~N(JL i~ ~, I ,, i 1~ ~Ac. CITY OF RANCHO CUCARIONOA PROJECT: /R. /336 'J ~l' ASSESSMENT DIAGF?AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION /.~- /- §~5 urWYIY(V/M INS// VM/~~H Uw 1 ~ MGM .~ Y ~. i ~• ti ~ ~,f ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ta IaAi'1 .~ ~ lalfll ~Tj~ .Ilu' uwuo+~ lY 1~7~A ~ CfTY OF RANCHO CiIGAMONQA PROJECT: 7R. 136Hd, V, - -~~ 7AifALail 4S { j ~~'. t SO'f 1 1 , 4 I , • Nat: i ........ ~. f ~i~ i w i 1 arrrxa% \ r--• ,~~. • u iu ~_ ~ w~ i ~ I ~ aAUU~ i 9 .I . i iii ariiw..., 9 II ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM '~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Di3TflICT NO. 1 III ~~ ANNEXATION i~t-~I-gg ~ ~.- I.1( III ~. -.~ ~~~~ i~-y~~o', ~~ C ~ ~ - - -1"i' i - - ;~+y~~ ~ ~~ -~ I' / I v -, . ' - - • L~ _. ~ ~ . •. • • • a ~, ~ Imo` ..~ ---- _ ~I T I I ~ - 4_ - - - - - ~ i;' j r i -- -- - , i "~-- -I- ~% II ..~.• ~ ! ' I ,. ~' ~ I ~~7~E (~ j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONDA N l PROJECT: 7R~135H~-a- --- ASSESSA/1EPIT DIAGRAM l LANDSCAPE MAINTEivi,~:CE D19TRICT NO. L I~ it ANNEXATION l- y- 85 i I ~-~+af~+r.W~, y ~ I ,~ ~ ;~ i I ~ k . l ~~ ~ ~ i ..,. ~ a I i Y. ~'~ ~ 1S ~J / 65~`~ ~a j ~~--- --- it I ~ iil ~~7 ~ r li CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: / 3DG 3 - - -- --- --- rR. -- ASSESSAAENT DIAGRAM ~I '; LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D19YRICT NO..~ ~~ ANNEXATION /- ~- 8° ,, i' ~I it ~~ ....e ...... _ o • _.. i - ~~ ii ~ ... ,... ....... ~~ .. •.1.. .. __ r. _. wnw~. _,___ 1 ,, it ~ }~+~~~-. it i .~ ~l.-~:_~~.. ~ ~ ~ , !1' j I •I, w '~ ~ ~~~.0~ .r ~ e ~ _, . •. ~ ~ r d r' ~•_ ~~ ~ i r ~ i • • '~~ i I ~ T t • ~ ~ ~ • w I • ~ ~ __ ~\ ~_ ~ ~ ^NI I lIY ~~~ ~V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT: j"R. 1a33~ -~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ ANNEXATION a - ~ - 8 9 i ,,r ~' ~.I _%: ~ ~~ ~ r I ~T~ 1 ili .. ~..` Y 1/~~ I~ ~~ ~ ~] r3UN-1Y4~11w1 ~,aeR~aL ~ QWe~ew.aY 'D(iWG ~~ ~ ..~'~ I . Y ~ ~I j' r~ --- ~_ ;r I~ ~ I ~ I I I ~~. ~ t~l ~ `~7 ~ ~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: ~~, /,2d`/ S -- \ ~^ ASSESSMENT DiAGf;AM ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIJTFIICT N®.L i i ANNEXATION 4 - S-~y it I~ ~~ --- !I •swus ~ ~ ~ ~~~ : ~ ~I ai • r ~ M it 1 ~ it ~„ I • ~ ~ N it U h :~ ~r, y r~ _ / N , y ~~ t ~ ° i i .. ,..~ ~..: ,~ ' i I II i. I I i i II ~~ ~ w I I A l Y I~ I i I N { M 'I ~ ~ ' ~`~7 ~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~ PROJECT: TR.. I~~~G-~ ~l' ~ -- ----- /~ ~;~ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM iii LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~, ANNEXATION ~~ 5 - S5 LOdI A/Ytlt I I . ~~ ~ ~~ . l o -i~ ~ Lrral -~ f ~ ii ~ ~:~~ ~I ~~I ~~ ry ~ Li ~~ I ~. ~~ i. ' ° '~ a Y '' ~ ~ ~~.~ - ~~ ~~ ~,, ~~~ =i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ el~ W ~ ~ P ~~ L- ' ~ I ! - ~ ~. ~ "I Mi ~T `~ 1 A.~J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR. 13Sd3 ~!q - - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI~TfiICT NO. Z Ar:NEXATION N-5-~9 m. Nd i3 ai 2 - c` ~• ~e ~s v u 19 20 xl ~ YJ x+ ~J- ~ a ""~~'' _-I I I c a s l y 6 6 e a 12 ae .wr ~i ~v ti.~wa C) n'f ~1 `ti h .'~ ry .~'~ ,ti ,, /~7A K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: lR. l3S'1,~ - 3 i e~; ~. , r~,'~ ,//~ I z : : ~/ ;/ IA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION y'-s- x9 'RACY NC. l35;~-3 ' . ~ ~ ' ' 4 ! 1111 1 ' C E < 2 ~ ! Lr, , j ~ :~ l ., i•=i - 11 fl I I- i- i i 1 ,5~~ i ~/ i/%~ ~ 3• 06 Olf ~~ ,~j~ 1 2 ~ • 6 4 7 ~ //,' ~~ /~ ~ k - !..! / sa 'T ~ 117 "' 61 •eo •f II I I• w I: I1 l0 9 e ; ~ II I •a •~ N li I. le Is e~ I• Is 20 <a I !._!: ,u •- ~~ li I -- - - it /r i i ~ ' 79 ~ ~ ~ it II ~ ~ ~ Z! /// i i ~ ~ i i i ~ ~ i i ~ 3• ~ II 1 ~ 71 i i i I 1 ' ' ~ i~ l~ 7 ~4 ~.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: "~R, /3~"~~- E II ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REP®RT T A 1~T71C ('+ A DT. T.T A T1~TTL\1~T A AT!'~Ti T7CTAT!'~T ATl1 ~ l-IC11\LUVLIL 1J 111A11\1111\C11\V:.:J YlIJ 11Y1V 1 L\V• !~ (VII;"f(IRIA PLAYtiF,D COJIIQUNITYI F'ISCAI. YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCE{0 CUCA~IONGA API'ROVEU: RUSFF;LL l1AGUIRE, CITY F.NGINh'ER City of Ranchc Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No Uiatoria Planned Cotmnunity Fiscal Year 1989/90 The annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 is prepared in compliance with the cequ irements of Article 4, Chapter t, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California !Landscape and Lighting Act cE 19721. This report dea Ls with the maintenance costs for fiscal year 1988/89 and the projected maintenance costs far fiscal year 1990/91. These projected casks are used to determine the assessment rate required to provide the highest quality of landscaping at the lowest passible assessment. T:ie funds are used to f'urni sh services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways, parks, and trail improvements. Maintenance of this district is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated ir, this repert. Maintenance of parkways, parks and trails include repair of irrigation and necessary.clean ing and repair of trails. The maintenance aLsorinc lodes providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. Trimming, spraying, fertilizing and/or treating for disease or injury as well as removal of trimmings, rubbish or debris are pact of the ongoing maintenance. Walls immediately adjacent to parkways are ceps iced and kept free of graffiti as part of the maintenance process, Park, parkway and trail improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 were constructed 6y the developers of the individual subdivisions, The plans and improvert~ents are as stipulated in the conditions of approval far each development and as approved by the Engineering Divisicn. Review of Fiscal Yeac 1988/69 The loan repayment was reduced by 60,000 to provide funds Ear the completion of the White Alder project. Park s and parkways experienced a lot of vandalism which shows in the high expend,tures in Co ntract Ser•~ices, B8/89 As of Projected Budget 3/31/89 6/30/89 dssmt. Admin. 11,200 11,200 11,200 Ma int./Oper. 8,000 3,504 5,040 Veh. Ma int./Oper. 10,604 49 10,604 "Contingency Trees 9,000 -0- 9,000 Loan Repay. 92,000 -0- ""132,000 Contract Serv. 125,000 124,607 161,592 Tree Ma int./Coot Adm 10,000 -0- 10,000 Capital Expend. 12,000 -0- 12,000 Water IOO,DDO 52,626 96,300 Electric 8,000 3,239 5,760 Park Maint, 72p,000 11,223 56,208 White Alders -0- 31,924 31,924 5G5,dD4 1sa. 452 541 .eta n,..:..,. c: eat r toga/qq rntc s r ally a ec>d ac varant land w>ro parcels iota l 614 developed. These additional units . 'Currently there is $10,000 in the reserve accoun t for tree replacements from a rtajor storm or disaster. An additiona l 55,000 is hudgeted for fiscal year 1989/90. ""$100,000 from Carryover funds. The $100,000 carryover and the $ 32,000 budgeted will be paid to the Beautification Fund to reduce the loan balance. T his will leave a balance to the lcan of approximately $156,00 0. Funds will be budgeted for fiscal year 1909/90 to again reduce the balance with final payment scheduled for 1990/91. ii Fiscal Year 1999/90 T!;e projected expenditures Eor Ei scai year 1999/90 will provide for contl ~Ued maintenance of parkways, parks and trails. Budgeted funds far capital projects are for moisture sensors and/or reconstruction projects. Landsc one District 2 Praj. Budget 97/99 88/39 99/90 Admin. 9,064.00 11,200 14,056 Overhead -0- -J- 3,37.9 Payroll 8,662.70 -0- -0- Fringe Ben. 4,797.00 -0- -0- Mal.nt/Oper. 14,469.96 S,OSJ 30,000 Ueh. Maint. 1,725.4G 10,604 12,000 Cunt: act 75,593.-02 161,592 305,000 Cap. Expend -0- 12,000 +J,GDJ Water 47,029.93 96,300 11.0,000 Electric 2,231.50 5,760 12,000 Irreq. Res. -0- -0- :O,OC0 Pazk Maint. 73,271.13 56,200 142;000 `Rencv. 834,331.79 -0- -0- Tree sem. 4,973.33 -0- -0- Contingency -0- -0- 5,000 i,can Repay. -0- 100, 00G iJ,JJJ Cunt Adm/Tree Maint. -0- 10,000 15,000 Wh ae Aldezs -0- 31,924 -J- 7,0!6,049.55 500,630 763,395 Large amcants cf new car kways assumed for ma intend ore n=.:e ss state the increase :n contract services, water and el ecru uty. Prcjected Revenue - It :s est>,mated there w>,11 re 3474 assessment units and approximately 699 acres to ce assessed as vacant land. After review of expenditures, a sses sn»nt receipts, pessi6le casts, the assessment rate far Fiscal Year 1'309/99 will remora at $1351 unit. Asses smear receicts far any Eiscai year are not received until after ar .,. .,a as _- _,, car r.._..__ .,.,,ds ... __ ~c n3 ~ distr tct ma :ntenance until ~=JanuaryYVand `r epayment~ of 'loan •te the Beautification Fund. 3414 A.U. x $195 = $665,130 699 Acres x $ 40.75 = $ 34,076 $699,806 Carryover Funds $ 63,579 $763,305 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 $230 $220 $210 $200 $190 y i ~ i -• i i ~ ~ 65/66 66187 67/88 ^ 88189 69/90 Fiscal Year -a---- Assessment Rates ~~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 (HYSSOP AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SLBMITPED BY: A.SSE>SSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION , APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual "engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. J Zone A HVSSpp The 1999/97 annual report far Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 - Zone A is crepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California llandsc ace y Liynt in9 Acn of iaaZ i, This report prcvides information cutlining actual maintenance costs for Zone A !Hyssopl for 1999/99 and projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90. The projected casts are used to establish the necessary assessment ratp to provide the highest quality of landscaping while maintaining the lowest assessment, Assessments will be used to furnish services and materials far the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways in the district. The maintenance eE Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Zane AI is considered of general benefit to all parcels within Zone A and the tests shall he divided as indicated in this report, Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any Fart of any improvement, providing far the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease pr injury; the removal of tr iimli ngs, rubhish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal Erom walls imir~ediately aajac ent tc the cultivated areas. -. .,._... :___-___._._ ..:...:_ .,.. a.--,.... u,:..~u.. ar.u n; <«.; ~« Nn i 9nno a . ~. ,, ...i ..,.r.... ....._.. __ _-_..... __..__._~.. .__.. were constructed by the developer. The plans for the irt~provements are as stipulated in tie conditions of approval Eor the development and as approved by the Engtneering Divisicns. Fiscal Year 1909/39 Review The matntena nce of Zone A ;Hyssopl continues normal and routine. This pore icn of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 remains constant with eight parcels. Ne cha nges are anticipated. 90/99 As of Projected Budget 3/31/99 6/30/99 Aa amp AdRI~ 32.OD Ma int./Opar. 50.00 14.99 JS .00 Ooh. Maint. -0- -D- -0- Contract Serv. 900.00 696.53 900.D0 Water 900.00 J4. 03 300.00 _lectr a 100.30 75.50 100.00 Contingency 75.90 -0- 75.00 3,057.00 953.07 1,743.00 Fiscal Year 7989/90 Zone A cf Landscape Maintenance District Nc. 3 is cpnskani with eight cartels. 1989/90 Buaget. As smt. ndmi~ 32.00 Overhead 7p,pp Marnt./Ccer. 735,00 Veh. Ma int. _p_ Contract Serv. 1,450.00 Water 390.00 Electric I5p.00 Contingency -p- 2,077.00 After review cE exc mditures, assessment rece.pts, projected expenditures, the assessment rate far 1999/90 will remain at :258.75 per parcel. d Assessment Units x $]59.75 ~ $2070 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A $soo $280 $260 $240 $220 ~ i $200 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year ~- Assessment Rates City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Repcrt :.andscape Maintenance District No. 3 Zone B - Commerc it l/Industrial Fiscal Year 1989/90 Tie 1989/90 annual report far is ndscape Maintenance District No 3 - Zone H (Ccmunecc is l/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19771. This report provides information outlining projected casts for fiscal year 1389/90 fcr Zone H ICotmnerc ial/Industr ial 1. The projected casts are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the Highest quality landscaping while maintaining the lowest assessment. Specifically, assessments wi 1). 6e used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of median islands within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3- Zene B is considered of general benefit to all pax'c eis within Zone H and the costs shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance activities include the repair, removal o: replacement of all or any part of any median island improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and neauty cE tae lzndsrap mg, trinm:i ng, spraying, fertilizing or treating '. or disease er injury; the cemeval of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from a.iiannn4 4.. 41,n •,14~„a4 n.i Median island improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Zone P were constructed Dy developers and/or City contract. The plans far median island improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval far each develocment and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fisca] Year 1988/89 Review Haven medians from 4th Street tc R/R north of Baseline were completed. Hiqh water consumption Iduring construction and plant establishment) and higher than projected contract maintenance charges caused this district major problems. The total assessment rate projected did not provide sufficient .,:,ds. sLGr,i~, de6Li JV ad mall tx ees and iu iuatiun sox inkier i;eads n eetl to nee replaced to conserve water. Due to the financial status of the district I:r ee replacements are planned for 1989/90. During fiscal year 1988/89 the following projects were annexed to Zone H of Landscape Maintenance District No, 3 (Commercial/Industr iall. LANDSCAPE 3-B - ANNEXATIONS FOR 1989-90 ANNEX 17 DR 07 26 30.5 ASST. UNZTS ANNEX 18 DR 87-16 .5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 19 DR 86-43 2.5 ASST. UNITS ANNEX ?0 CUP 87-04 3.84 ASST. UNITS DR 86-32 .69 ASST. UNITS ANNEH 21 DR 87-41 I.20 ASST. UNITS CUP d7-42 2.27 ASST. UNITS ANNEX 22 PM 10941 7.29 ASST. UNITS DR 86-08 1 ASST. UNITS DR 87-62 BB ASST. UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMB'eR 21, 1988 DR 87-28 B.i ASST. UNITS DR 87-56 16 ASST. UNITS CUP d5-19 6 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 5, 19dd CUP 87-16 16.4 ASST, UNITS CUP 07-26 21 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 2, 1988 DR E7-69 210-391-16 210-391-17 ii of n___z o, _~q r oqr, arvcv r DR 87-61 3.7 ACRES ANtJEXEU DECEMBER 'l, 1988 DR 88-18 4.21 ACRES PM 10238 pcl I .46 ACRE pcl 2 2.15 ACRES pcl 3 2.02 ACRES ANNEXED DECEMBER 21, 1988 DR 86-27 209-261-13 5 .96 ACRES ANNEXED JANUARY 4, 1989 hIDR 08-19 3 .26 ACRES DR 87-19 209-261-16 DR 87-20 209-261-1d 1. 592 ACRES 709-251-19 1. 047 ACRES 209-261-22 1. 11 ACRES DE 07-'.i 2^!-2'!-69 . 6^, ACRES ANNEXED JANUARY id, 1980 DR BB-28 4.046 ACRES DR d7-61 229-121-36 14.34 ACRES ANNEXED FEBRliARY 15, 1909 PM 10981 pcl 1 2.76 ACRES pct 2 2.76 ACRES pct 3 2.78 ACRES pct 4 9.98 ACRES ANNEXED MARCH 15, 1989 DR 87-06 10.0 ACRES DR 80-?6 2.99 ACRES CUP 00-20 .73 ACRE Fiscal Year 1989/90 AL1 parcels within Zone B will be assessed on a net acreage basis Ear the maintenance of landscaped medians on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Fcothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City Limits, Mi 1l.iken Avenue and Rochester Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 5th St: eet from Haven Avenue tc Rochester Avenue and other median islands on major divided highways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. For fiscal year 1989{90 the median island on Haven Avenue wi it be maintained from 4th Street to Beer Creek Channel. Additional phases of Haven Median are under constructed but only area fronting conunezc ial development will be assumed by this distr[ct. Projected 1989/90 Expenditures Assmt. Admin. $ 624 Overhead 590 Maint.(Operati qns 10,000 Vehicle Maint. -0- Contract Services 69,000 Water 12,000 Electric 600 Conii agency 1,000 Cap. Proj. J0, 000 Tree Maint./Cont. Adm. 2,000 5125.n1d After review qE expenditures for 7999/B9 and projected casts Eor !989/90 it has been determined the assessment rate for Zone B wili he $160/acre. This is a majcr increase aue to high rt~a intenance costs, water and the need to cepiace trees. 737.7 Acres x 5170 = $I 25, 409 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B $200 $150 $100 $50 --" $Oy r ~ r ~ 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year ~- Assessment Rakes I~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-.Ci ANNEXATION NO. / ~ •~~ar •o~u /ly~.~. ~1. ~ ~ r.~, ~ _, 3 .ar ~ 'r ~. i -••i i ~{i z III ~ ,.. s ~ +~ :~ 1. t .~ r s I K ~~ '; 9, ~~ i~ +~ : , ? L~f~°T; j~ o~` I _ti x~? li ~ ,~~~~~" -.. i N .''. .+~.~lL ~! JI •i ~ ' J ~ I v~ I ~ C •.ta_ • ...., .. _$/3~. ". ~r':.' ~._ ~ -- r, ~• '.I V ~ ~.. sx ... .. ~ 3..~~ •• ~Jwr• ~~'~.t. ++ t : l.:l J.t J .rani %// 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: p. R. B~-AG e Q ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-B ANNEXATION NO. 18 ~$1TE ~ /ofifM4L rL TKO rM~1 1 , 5w'w--- ~w~w i .: • ..w. ww ~+~w ' L-.. W ~Y.D MIIO~I NW. ~i ~~ L. 1nY / 1 ~ ~~ I' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IIYA,1 PROJECTS p, (i. 87-16 (~- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ^' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-B ji ANNEXATION NO. 19 ~ I iiI i II II Ii I~ I~ !~ I ~ I~ VIII '~i I11 II`, I~ 'I 1 Y ~,~7 ~L (, ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONQA N PROJECT: D, R, 86'"!3 ~ P ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 •~3 ANNEXATION NO. do ~~~~~f~ ~ ~ ~,,• ,~` wrwe ~• a~~~ M1LN YIL 1 1 ~p •.if ~GY/l .w ~t•o~ 1 ~ ~. i 0.' ::• . ~. ~ ~ . "N .® ' 11 ~;.~ i~ .~; ~i ~: '"'fit! ! I aicauao ~v[wt ~ +i I~7~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA PROJECT: C.U.R 87-0 ASST=SSMENI' DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D13TRICT NO. 3- 3 ANNEXATION NO. ~2U 1~713~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: p, R, fr6~3,'L ~~ i,_~ k __ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D13TIaICT NO. 3-Q ANNEXATION NO. d r ii !i I ~I' ~ ~ ~ I J I i A11110W MWY ~I i I _ ~~ I~ I i' I •en III ICI ~\ 4I ~ ~ u i II ~ ~ ~~ '' w ~~ I ~ (~ i I' I I I _ i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: D. A. 87- ~ / , 1. - - - j ( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 ~ LANDSCAFc eAA1NTENANCE R~STR9CT NO. .3-B I ANNEXATION NO. a ~ ~~~ ~i i I ' ~~ it , / 1 ~~ 'E I 1 / ~ .... . , i W h ' ' I ' ` III ~ , , '~'/ • ~w~ /l 1 i i III Ili ~~ I w _~ I' i~~ a~ MONOA NCHO CUGA RA CITY OF ~, PROJECT: C c~. ~ S~" ya- JJ ~ ~ ---- (~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM \Il j LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ®ISTRICT NO. 3-b ~ ANNEXATION NO. ,~ ~ ~ I~ ~:I I - ill ~ ~j 9 '' ~ a II ° ~ a l~ a . ~ ~ a~ ~ ~j < _ III 6""S1- I e -I st II lj dw cr. - ~ ,~ ~... ~ III I ' N III j ~I I IORRWY. ~ ~ ~~ I~ ;~ ~~ '~ i ~ i I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA ' PROJECTa QTR. l09~// V ~ i ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-n ANNEXATION NO. as i»-=- III I i ^ ~~. ` ~ I J ,©""" T` " ~ .,,. / ..~..m ~I / ~~ w s l ~ ~ ~ -; , I! ,. ~B ~ _ ~ I I ~, -- - ,; ~, o ~,~ A ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ `~ ~ i ,- ~~~,' ;I ~ 173- I, CITY ;`F RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: p.~, 86-og ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ ~~ ,I LANDSCAPE iiAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-Q ~i. I i ~ ANNEXATION NO. a a, i Ij ~ ~ ~ a I I i; II i~ ~ ;~ ~I ~ 'I , ' i i' ~ "~ ,~S I TE °~ i~ ~ a ~; i, I" ~"r Illil ~ i I - ICI ~ .. I ~ li I I I I : v ~ ,T1 ~i s ~ f 's ,I ,1 ' ; _° i o - i. I {~ i i ~1 1 W I~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ N011TN 1 ,I ~ ~ I III ,' \' I f -~~ i! SIN - ~~ ii Tit II I ~~7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO~~lQA PROJECT: !~. R. 87- 5 a- - ---- - - - - - -- = -\ ((I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 it LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ~~ ~ ANNEXATION NO. d a. ~ ~I ~ ~ r it ,I ; I ' i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~, ~ o ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~; i ~ ~,~ o.., ', ~ i~ ~ i I 1~7 ~ ~ ~ ~` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA b ~I PROJECT: G.U R 87-1y ~ I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-13 ANNEXATION 9 ~a r f ~~ ~ I . ' III ~[~tl •IY[[[ VIII, ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~ i I` L'---°-- I ~ I ~ iI {{ ~ I l__~ i ' ~ ~ ~ i III ~~~ , ~ ~ I:~ I, I I L_ I~ ~ -~ i~ ,_ ~, r i _ ~ G/TG ~>za.a ~~i ~ ~® .~~ r-t_. I~! III I "er"r ,t r ' ~ I `_~ `"_ I ~~ ~ ~ III i ~ i !I ~~ -~ °i 1 ~ 7 ~ ~- I' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA it PROJE'.': D.R. 87-dS V, I( ASSESSMc~T DIAGRAM ~ LAND3CAPE MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. _3- Q ANNEXATION 9~ai ~8~ ~ i 1'r.._~_ ; '' ii i __,___~_tVW ~-w' o ,~ .,r ~~ ~ ~ «, ..ter.. ~ V ~I ~ ~ ^' I M ~ ~ !1 ~ . N ~' ', ® +r ~ I y r ... ~ .... ,,: ._ ~,, i~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -----° ~~- ------------- sirE ii 1~ ~ i i r~7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA I'i PROJECT: ~ R- ~~" p~- (/1 ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ^l LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. 3-B ANNEXATION 9~a/ ~~~ ~ L ~ i fQd lhLL6 r~71A1 WlIG - 1 '~ I ~ _. ~ t1 `` y i I ~' .w i' ~.. N S F ~.. ~'A.q... P eu~~~; ;_ id k' ~...:,~ , ,Mr~• _ ., ~ i ~ .a .w ml .N m(~ a. iw .w roi ~ 0 ® W G 3 0 "J 'J O ~; ....I... I .. I - i j~~ ~ ~ .. _ T "urawt ---.. -..._ ~ --ernur ~ .ha .• 3 w P ~o~ G ~ 3 p M 0' p® ~d0 , illy z 1 Y l~- ~ =T A N ~i i'},~ M y ,. I -yc_- ' II ~~ _ ~ 11 i N ~ ~ 1(~ sl N y7J r~ h ^N' lY /~7 ~ N I~ CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONAA PROJECT: C. U P 85 -l9 ~l ~ ~ ~ --- ASSESS~~iEWT DIAGFir".~1 ,1 i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. s- e j'' ANNEXATION io~~~~8g • -- - --- - ~,.. .A.... -- ill ~ ~~~_ c-==~, ' I' !! II ji pp -- ' ii; ~ L ~ i, ' li ~ - ~ ~ ~ - I -Y - ~ _~_ - - _ _ - _ '~i I I il' ~ - W Y ^ IL ~ ~ ~ V , Y~~Y li ~_ ~S ` rY ~~ f ~~ t"t ~ n i Vii, nip: iuiunni~ ~~.. ''~.~ snra r~ --~,r. I! ~I I N ~~ I~7 3 ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~i ~I PROJECT: C..U.B 87-!6 ~- \ I~ ASSESSMENT' DIAGRAM ,i f.ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-Q ANNEXATION io~s~BS I !I ~ - ti~ Ili ~ ~ ~ ~ `, i ~~,, ~ ~ I'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~I `J , ' I ,, _,„_I_ _I~~Ly~ .~ IpTi *~ iRITiTfTi'~ l _____~--1 ~ - _J1 ; d -- ii I ~' ~ 111 ~~~---,..I„I~, ~ ' ~~ I, :, I I ; „,„ ~~ {-. --mil f i C ~~~ n ~ ~ li ,,, ', i li ~ I `t / 7 ~f CITY OF gANCMO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: C. U, R $ ~- ~ 6 ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~I ~ LAND SCAPE MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. s' 8 it j ANNEXATION i~ ja/8~ I~ ~ I ' I ~ ~ I I I~ ~,I ~~ i I, i ~i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~7 (1'~ ~c I CITY OF RANCNO CllCAMONQA PROJECT: p. R. 8'7- S9 ,grow j ~ I r~T&SFRR ~, v Y ~ _ ul Q _ _ ~ OCh -~rH ©04Q I „ ~ ~+ ., ~ ~, " , . ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-d ANNEXATION /~~a /8~- I ~I I ~ 'Jfi-+ I II ' ~~~^3T/iFE7 ~ 6/A S7AEf7 ' ~' ~ ~ ~ Ij ji _, y s t I ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ fY/7URf ~l1LOIN0 ~I e ~' ~ ~ _, , M (~7 ~t~ ~ III CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA i PROJECTS ~, R ~~- 61 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE A19AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-(j ANNEXATION ia~~~~8 ~~'i A ll~ ~~~ I ! f \ r~rs.~~ ~ __ J In s a ~ ~ ~LiJdJ -~~~ ~~ re-s r (~ la I I J ~Ill V ~ I -- ---_---~--~III _ ' ~-~ .-. -e.-~j ~ IMII I, ~~~ ~ wt. «s.w.u ^ ~ r v ~ I I l ~ U 114 I IL' H~ -y,I ,~-_~. ~ ~ - -------- VI ~ ...-..~ ~ PvOJee f'• . ~ ~ ~~V ;fI I r I ~~ S I TG n ar.w•y.~\v •~l1 ~~ Ij~ .~• I ~ \ ~ I i tl ~p~ ~l 1'`' -~J„1_- ill I`_.- `...~...'T' I t i I ~\ ~~w•~• J li wo...r I, '~ AL.:.:.~~y 'In lu;~l NI 1Y /7.35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: p. R. SB-18 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-8 ~! ANNEXATION la /7 /e8 I~ ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D13TRICT NO. 3-t3 ANNEXATION /a /a ~ /~8 X23 ~ry ~,lA,l V ~ it I ~.a+\n~ ~ ~ ~ '~ . - WET t ~ r ~~ .........1~ ~~ r ~~~~ i ~'a i~ ~ `I sir[ t,~ ~ : ,I m i ~ I t '~_ ..,~, ~~ ,RC nn.Y I 1 ~ ~ Oiv©to v(D ~~'OD. _ Ili ne Y°° II ~ WIK I VI~CI~Nr ~1~~® ~A~.[ Yl' ~~ \~ ® W~A~W. I T ~I ~r,l I • YY`^' ~ ~. , I i A Kf ~ _rei_ I v i ~~ r.~ :I ~ vncnNr III ~ I ;I '~ ~ I ~ _ ~ - ~~ li N tY 1~73U CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONaA ~I~ V 1 PROJECTt ~. R. 8~-~'7 ~ - -- --tea- ---- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANASCAPE MAINTENANCE (DISTRICT NO. 3-8 ANNEXATION i w~a9 ~( ,roothll blvd. ~~ c ~ e f 4 L fi~`• /~ IOCatIOfl _.JLr itrow mutt l ~~ ~A~~~ ~L-. ~+ ;w' s I.t. i ~.f. rollroad N ill ~~7 ~ U CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONOA V, PROJECT: m D.R. 8819 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAND8CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-Q ~~ ANNEXATION l~`f/89 ~~ I I ~ ~~ Iii i ~ it \ ' ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ I I ~ \ ~ ' ~ ~ ~t i ~~I ~ i l ~ x.Im ~ _ _ II j `' ~~ II ~ .,.~... , ~.. ~ 1-- ~~ I~ i ~ ~ ~~ li ~ '~" C 'I I -J 9 L.J~I..~l~ i' ~ =- ~ ~.c«,- I III •uu._ .,a... ~ li ~ 4 ( ~ IIf i ~~ ~ i i ( I i i I' ~ ~ I I i fl~ (~7 ~ w ~i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI~AONOA PROJECT: D, R. 8?-l9 +`~ 89'x0 VV~1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 LANDBCAPE MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. 3-q II ANNEXATION i/v/89 ~ ~~ ~ -~- - ~-_- --- _-- III •.-y. ~_ • .wy / ~_ Y II~ ~ I I ~ ~ - ~ ~ '~ I ... . !Y I i ~ , ~ ~ ~.~ f ~ ~ \~ ~~~ ~'~r~~~ ~ ~r r~V ~~ i TIC L ~~~I ~ ~ 1~~ -~ i Y 5, ~ ~ II I ~ ~7 I' l X ~ CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA N PROJEGT~ D.R. 89- 17 ( ASSESSMENT DIAGIRAM 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-t3 I~ ANNEXATION /jl8/s9 i ii ~--sirE' ~:_; , ••.~,.. i ~" i ~= • ~• '~~ ~~ ..,®.r. i ~ '~• y 6 0 ~ r` ~ ~-~" ' --I.-..+.~-~ • ~ ~ ~ o.~ 1 i• r ti~l ~ •r r~ rr Y/ 7 •~ ,~ i +~ ` q ~ i I II ~~ ~~ M ,~~ ~r I m i ._t~ _ __L.~. -- ~ l ~~ I I Nil II lY r /~ 7 ~ y i I CITY OF RANCHO OUCAMONOA PROJECT: p. R. k~ a $ --- - - - -- - -- i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE ANAINTENANCE DISTRICT NC. 3-f3 ANNEXATION ~ /~ s~/85 3/T~' :. ^+ +~~ - ~ _y ~ i~4 ei ~.~ ~~ ,~{ ~ ' fl I~ f l` I , I ± Y *. ' , ~. tit y I' ~ .~ ~j ! li I~ ~ 1 ~I ~ ~' ~r 0 W~ ~ /= .~ I~ I~7 B z- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONpA PROJECT: lJ,R- g~-s/ ~/' ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1 'I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. 3-B ~ ANNEXATION a(~s~fr5 II ~I ~' ~~(~ i ~~ WIIW f~ I ~ ._ !i ... ~~ ~~~ .~.,, o.~ ~.. s ...., wwr u.rv+r ,., 1~7 C ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: P M. ! a 9 Y~ i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ I( LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3-B I; ANNEXATION 3/is~89 +I l I ARROW ROUTE ,~ ~ ~w JERSEY BLVD. I I ~I ~~'s~ ~ ~ -N it ~, - - -- .. : ~-10 'I ._~. ~ ~ .. I I '' ~ ,~ ii 1~7~3 i ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA L~ PROJECT: Q. R 8~-Q!o ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D19TRICT NO. 3-~ ANNEXATION .~~ia'~~y i u ./ ~~, aQ ~ ° ......, -uo i w ~/ /`t'7 ~C ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA PROJECT; ~ ~Q, 88- /b ~/) ~~_T ~l I j ANNUM. ENGINEER'S REPORT ~~ II jl LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 ~i 'I ITERR,a VISTA PLASHED CO'~i~ItiAITYI ~ I ~~i~ ~ ;~ crcCar ygan Igag~gn CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMGNGA I I ~' SU[3MI P?'F:D BY: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMINISTRATION ' i I RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CPCY ENGINEER ~` -- City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Terra Uista Planned Community r'iscal Year 1989/90 The annual repcrt Ear fiscal year 1989/90 for Landscape Maintenance District !ic. ;Terra U sta; i- prepared ccmpliaace with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter lj Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cal if ornla ;Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs far 1988/89 znd projected Lasts for fiscal year 1999/90. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will 6e used to furnish services and materials Eor the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways, parks and trails within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Marntenance District No. 4 is cans idered of general benefit to all areas within the d is[r ict and the cost shall be divided as indicated ir. this report. Maintenance of parks, parkways and trails include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing Eor the life, growth, hearth and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, Eertillzing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of tnmmr ngs, rubbish, debris and other solid vaste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas. Park, parkway and troll improvements within Landscape Maintenance Distr t<t No. 4 were ccnstructed by the developer of the individual subdivisions. The plans and improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each develcpment and as approved by the Engineering Division. Rev rev of Fiscal Year 1988/89 Maintenance during the current fiscal year on landscaped areas continued to 6e routine. Currently there is $1,150 in the contingency Eund which is far the replacement of trees lost in major storms or disasters. An additional 55,000 vi11 be budgeted in 1989/90. :ag f:ccal year logo; oo _..e f^11^_vl.^.g tracts w<re annex>d ro L3!Id 5ra pq Maintem:we District No. 4: LANDSCAPE 4 - ANNEXATIDNS FOR 1589-90 ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 2I, 1988 TRACT 13273 118 ASST. IIN ITS TRACT 17270 110 ASST. UNITS ANNEXED 0f7fOBER 19, 1988 PM 9897 30 ASST. UNITS PM 11341 23 ASST. UNITS MARCH 1, 1989 PM 11030 143 ASST. UNITS TRACT 14150 64 ASST. UNITS Fiscal Year 1989/90 Separate accounts for trail ma intenance and vandalism repair have b^en added. It is important to be able to track these activiti es tc establish a history. Proj. Budget 87/88 88/B9 89/90 Assmt Admin 4,780 7,440 !1,276 Overhead -0- -0- 1,480 Maint/Oper 8,041 9,050 14,000 Veh Ma int 815 1,500 10,000 Contract Serv 33,680 52,000 113,000 Cap Expend -0- 40,000 10,000 Water 9,167 ^ 30,000 ~ nnn 52,000 ~ cnn Tree~M/Copt Adm -O^ 1D, 000 12,000 Contig Trees -0- -0- 5,000 Irreg Rest -0- -0- -0- Payroll 2,849 -0- -0- Fring Hen 1,728 -0- -0- Park Maint 20,170 40,000 100,000 Troll Maint -0- -0- 3,209 81,629 190,990 $334,465 "Projected Carryover $344,576 6 Months Funding 167,233 Base Line 173,000 Posstble Carryover 4,343 i Following is the Assessment Benef it Matrix outlining the rate of assessment for 1989/90. TERRA VISTA PLANNED COtR4UNITY ASSESSMENT BENEFIT MATRIX FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 Medians :arks Parkways Single Family 1430 A.U. 11,964.16 78,989.34 87,617.34 Multi Family 1478 A.U. 12,296.96 81,196.54 45,026.65 Cortmiercial 113.44 H.C. 1,888 64 12,469.11 -0- Vacant Land 93.54 A.C. 1,55E .13 -0- -0- Totals 27,705.60 172,644.99 132,643.99 ESTIMATED COSTS Median Maintenance $ 27,705.60 Park Maintenance $172,644.99 Parkway Maintenance 5132,643.99 $332,994.98 Medians Parks Parkways Single Family 1438 A.U. 1438 A.U. 1438 A.U. Multi Family 1478 A.U. 1478 A.U. 739 A.U. Commercial 227 A.U. 227 A.U. -0- Vacant Land 187 A.U. -0- -0- Single Family Hcncfa Asc,^,.t $24.18 .. 1438 $17a, ., ip, as Credits -0- Cazryover $ 19.18 x 1430 = $ 27,58 O.B4 Net Henef it 5105.00 $150,990.00 Multi Family Benefit Assmt $ 93.72 x 1478 = $134,956.18 Credit -0- Carryover $ .93 x 1478 = $ 1,374.54 Net Bene Eit $ 92.79 $133,SB1.64 ~CnSOCLC`31 Benefit Assmt $124.57 x 113.44 Aczes = $14,358.10 Credit -0- Carryovec -0- _ $126.57 $14,358.10 Vacant Land Benefit Assmt $16.46 x 94.54 Acres = $1,556.13 Credit -o- Carryover -0- $16.4fi $1,66b.13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 $tso $tso $tao $tao $tzo $tto $100 f r ~ i ~ i ~~-~ i ~ 85/86 86/67 87188 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year ~- Rssessment Ratos I, ( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ I LAND3CAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ II ~ ~ ANNEXATION 9~a/ ~ ~ ~' I !, - ~a ~ N r' • ~ III '. a ~ . 1 "~, IJ ~ ~ . e'+~ ~ .~ ~ ~, ~~ /~ tt~ :a ~ .iur ~-~row~~~ ire ~I ~ - - - - II ~ 'I IIII ~ III ~ ~ 7C S ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA T /3a 73 ~A~JECT: iC - -- - - i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAND8CAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICT NO. ~~ ANNEXATION 9/~/~88' ~. - - 1 ~~ ~ ii ~ i. h.~ ,Sf v~ i i ` c,, ISi `y~ .. 1 I ~ Ill ± ,'. ..~,l~~i~1iE ~'}'--~~ ~~. , ~__ •~I'~_-. ~; ~ .• _ _ ~~ i ~ ti ~~~ ,_.,l `` ' i` ,i '.. .. ' / ~~ ~.: i. ~~~ `j~ J ~ ~~~- ~~~~ ~ J x111 _` ~~~ lY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: TR. /30770 ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ ~ LANDSCAI`E MAINTENANCE DI8TRICT NO. ~/ II ANNEXATION ic~i9/sg i~ it I i ~' I~ -~-- -Y°- - -.. _"~ ~ ~--l ~ ~-~ ~~ I ~ ,~ ~~ 1~7c K ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: F' /Yl. g85'I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXJITION io~i9~8~' I, • ~i .~ . ._ _ .;~ "`r" iV _~!"i ~ ~wti1 fll _ ~ ~~ ~.. i. ~ ~ i i ~'~ 1 _„_, ~-• l ~7c ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A PROJECT, P rn, 1 13 `f ~ ~~ i ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D13TRICT NO. y ~I ~' ANNEXATION 3/~/~-y ', ' ,, ' i 'u+l ~ ~ , i ,~~_~~~~~~ II .,,.0 ~ ,. f~] uNl~~~q ' O. . l ° 9 -~' 1 , ..... -.moo , _ ~•~ ~ ""r`-' ID ~IIIZ ~•~ _ .~.. 1~~~~~~~11 b !~ II~,~~~~ rc~~-~i~g~I~.~w~~ ~ ~ ~~-.c,~,,......~~ R:_:..:•. ,,dam .111 :~lti'~•:_••', 16f.~.~r.r.~TQ~j `~ ......._ y ~ .- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ., „ i i ~ i~ t~ ~~7C ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA rHOJ6CT: P~7. //03ZJ '~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~~1 LANDSCAPE MSAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. hl ~ ANNEXATION 3ji /Sy I ~ I I' ~ ~. ~_ ~ i ~I~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Ili ~~ r ,: a~ ~ ii I' i ~ ,i ~`~7CoJ CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONOA PROJECT; TR, /1'/SD ~, '. t I j A1VIVUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT Ll~NDSCAI'E M.AINTENAIVCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (TOT LOT) ICI ~~ I > t'ii T + TLr '~ ~~ it ,t'~ ,' l i~ '~ FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 CITY OF RADICHO CUCA~IONGA SlrI3MPI-PED t3Y: ASSESSMENT REVENUE ADMIDIISTRATIGN APPROVE:D~ RUSSELL 1-LIGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 f TOt Lotl Fiscal Year 1999/90 The 1989/90 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 1TOt lot! is prepared in ccmpliaace with the requirements of Article 1, rhaoter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California !Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. This report provides information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1999/89 and projected costs for fiscal year 1989 /9 D. The projected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Specifically, assessments will be used to Evrnish services and materials Eor the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and the tot lot within the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District Na. 5 is considered of general DeneEit to all areas in the district and the cast shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of the tot lot and parkway include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, provid inq for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adjacent to the cult iveted areas. Parkway and tot lot improvements within Landscape Maintenance District Nc. 5 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivision. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1998/89 Maintenance continues normal and routine in Landscape Maintenance District No. 5. There were nu annexations to this district during the current fiscal year. The district was formed with the 11 units within the tract and theca are no plans to expand the district. Piscal Year 1989/90 An increase in contract services is required due to a change in contractors. Additional monies will also be budgeted for tree replacement due to storms. Proj. Budget 87/88 88/89 89/90 Assmt Admin 176 178 176 Overhead -0- -0- 23 Maint/Open 30 76 150 Contract Serv 2534 4836 3550 water 227 300 600 Electric 158 108 i26 3125 5495 4624 This district will continue to conkain the original 44 units. AEker review of expenditures, assessment rec eipis, possible carryover 1$6,4951 and projected costs, the assessment rate foc Fiscal Year 1989/90 will remain at $105.00. Assessment receipts are not received until after December 10. The estimaked carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance until January. Assessment Rate 1989/90 Carryover Funds:;•~~ ~ r~V, - $,762 $5,382 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 $t~o $tso $tsa $140 $130 - $120 $110 $100+ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 85/86 86/87 87/89 08/99 89190 Fiscal Year -+-- Assessment Rates ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 (CARYN PLANNED C01~Y~'NITI~ c~. ; • u.- ,.r. • ~. n °o°o FISCAL YEAR 1989!90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' SLBbiITiED BY: ASSESSi~NT REVENUE ADIVIL'VISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIItE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance Distri rt No. 6 (Caryn Planned Common ityl ?fiscal Yea[ 1989/90 The 1989/90 annual report Eor Landscape Maintenance District No, fi !Caryn ?iarned Ccsr~unity; is prepared is cprpli ante with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19711. This report provides information on actual maintenance costs and projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90. The projected costs era used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide qualify landscaping while maintaining or lowering assessments. Assessments will 6e used to furnish services and materials fot the maintenance, operation, servlc ing and restoration of parkways within the dl str ict. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and Lhe cost shall 6e divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities inc lode the repair, removal or replacement of all or any pact of any improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, is fuming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal Ecom walls immediately adjacent to Che cultivated areas, constructed by •the developers of~the~indiv idual^subdivisions' The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1998/69 Maintenance of parkways within Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 have not been assumed due to major prohlems with the establishment of plant material. Lt is the City's policy to insure the quality of landscaping before the district assumes financial responsibility. The district rt~ay experience some minor expenditures by the end of the current fiscal year. 99!89 As aE Projected Budget 2/28/89 6/30/99 Assmt Adman 1896 1696 1896 Maint/Oper 600 15 150 Contract Services 40,000 -0- 6000 Veh Maint 1099 -0- 500 Water 30,000 -0- 2000 Electric 2000 -0- 350 Tree Maint/Contract Adman 1500 -0- 500 Contingency 2000 -0- -0- 79,295 1911 11396 The following tracts were annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 during fiscal year 199 Bi B9. Fiscal Year 1989/90 uue m i+wuicu,~ pl,.., - 'ti^.^. ,et nmc maintem nca r.csts to the district have not been realized to `date. Funds collected in the prior year will be rebated in the amount of $92,130. It is anticipated that the existing Landscaping will become the districts responsibility Eor maintenance during 1969/90. Parcels annexed to the district ate as follows: LANDSCAPE 6 - ANNEXATIONS FOR 1999-90 ANN20UTION 3 TRACT 12613 49 S.F. TRACT 13555 17 S.F. TRACT' 13556 40 S.F. TRACT 13559 52 S.F. ~ To,ACr 13 cr,p 23 S.r. TRACT 13561 /3 S.P. TRACT 13563 44 S.F. ANNEXATION MAY 1, 1969 TRACC 13719 232 S.F. TRACT 13857 TRACT 13858 Projected 1989%90 Expenditures Assessment Administration 3756 Overhead 643 Maintenance/Operations 9000 Vehicle Maintenance 1264 Contingency/Tree Replc. 5000 Contract Serv/Vandalism 6400 Contract Serv/Maint 46,000 Tree Mai nt/Contract Admin 2600 Capital Projects 5000 Water 32,V00 Electric 3000 Irrig Restoration ?0,000 124,663 It is estimated there will be 17721 assessment units within this district during 1989/90. After review of possible expenditures and assessment receipts, and projected costs, the assessment rate will remain at $195.00. Assessment receipts are not received until after December 10. To fund the district until January $64,252 will be used and the [ema4ning cazryover funds 1$92,4301 will be rebated. 772 x 195 = $150,540 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 $soo $z5o $zoo $150 $100 ~ ~ ~ i ~ -~ 87/88 88/89 89/90 Fiscal Year v Assessment Rates A33E33MENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 3 i ~ ~ ~ w i ~ ~ n w n a ~ ~ n s s ^ ~~ ~ ~ +~ w a w„ a s ue / _ TWIT ~~ ~ ® ~ouwo coven o s.r. MI•I+I«Iyl~l~l "_ S>r34lt!!Q DOVER S~ sowo s.l~. NNI rl /~7CX CITY Of RANCNO CUCAMONOA ~pOJHCT~ TR. /d 6'i.? ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. ,3 ~ TuRr cwouwo cove T,1TS s.r. I a a L4l~ !~ ~4!!l~ [OVEII ss,ras s.r. /~ 7C ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTS T,q /35"SS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 3 T'om' 7 { { 7 { { » { H q t7 M t{ Q q t { / O ~~~ i 1{ ~i Y i i i i t{ i i i T i i {{ '\~~" ~{ i i A i i - TrfIV ~~ ~~ ~QYER AREA ..r.:. OROYMO COVtR o a.~. +s,aso s.R. I Cz ~~7 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA PROJECTt 1R. /9556 A83ESSMENT DIAt~RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 3 LI ~I ~l'1'1' ~• ,. n u u w x N ~ N . ~ L A Y y Y Y Y ~ y ~~ Y h Y ~~~~~. • N M M _r~. .~ S Y H Y L i1 ^ Y ~1 Y Y .. tl Y Y i ~I~1M~1 ~1-I l I ~ Imo' TUIV WIWMO COYEII ~~ GSOUND ~Q ~~ 2,OT0 i.F. 71,3{! S.F. I~( ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT: TR, /3558 A33ES3MEN7 DIAGRAM LANDSCJIPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 3 - .,, _ -+ ., .,,, _. ~ • • ~1 ~~ M p M M M~ M,~ C• ~,~--- . Tug c~ouNO covet ~ ~ ~~ COVER ~ ~.aoo s.P. ~~.rao s.f. /`~~ ~$ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTe TR, 13560 A33E33MENT DIAQRAM LAND8CAPE MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 3 ~`+~aanaaapar s °ws,.nysaars ~-..~•_, " r••ass•ssra• ~T~= ~ Tuer I!!SE t~ fi~4!!!!Q coven ~Fd '~ csouro covtR 7;,wo s.r, r~,uo a.r. ~~ IN I~ l I`f 7~C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECTi TR. 11561 Y) A33ES3MENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE IiAAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 3 1 . ~ . ~ a ~ i 1~ s N ~ i i Y M p Y M • p i ' N i Hii it i'i i y U N N 11 N Mi~liiMii/ ~ Tug ZUEE eELS ~l1tlQ DOVER ~dl~ GROOMO COVEII O,700 O.F. Y,W O.F. f~?~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA PROJECT: ?R . ! 9 5G 3 A33E33MENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. S/3/8y -- ~-` - • •~ 4 iY u ~ .~~, _r , .. ~C ~_ __ - _ i ~ 1 ~~ _ 4, 4 _ ~ •~~ ~. . j T ~ ~ NLMI~MO ~~YI MUI ~~I7~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA PROJECT~T. /37y8, /38Sy+/9Ir5g- ---- CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONvA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO FORM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 88-2 AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX, AUTHORIZATION TO FINANCE CERTAIN CAPITAL FACILITIES RND ESTABLISHING POLICY ON ANNEXATION OF ALL FUTLI2E DEVELOPMENT INTO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PORTION OF THE DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Hearing and adopt the attached Resolutions ordering any necessary changes and modifications, making preliminary findings and passing upon protests, declaring and establishing formation of Commmunity Facilities District No. 88-2 and authorizing levy of special tax, and declaring necessity to incur bonded indebtedness, submitting proposition to voters and establishing procedures and conditions for conduct of __ _... w.... ~.i,,,i Fha• r:t,r rn :nnil aAnnf the~~policy that` all future development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga be conditioned to annex to the Law Enforcement portion of the District. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On April 19, 1989 City Council adopted the necessary Resolutions initiating preliminary procedures and setting a Public Hearing for the formation of the Drainage and Law Enforcement Community Facilities District No, 88-2. The D.~inage portion of the District has been structure9 Eor acquisition of infrastructures in the amount of 3.4 milliun dollars from bonfl proceeds and 4.5 million dollars from City fees. The Law Enforcement portion of the District will be Eox uuetdLiuns and ida:ntenarce purposes with an Snitial special tax ranging between $112.00 and $432.00 annually, based upon the square footage of the home. The required public atiun of the Notice of Intention to form the District and the Notice of Hearing has been met. TFe Certificate of Compliance relating to mailing of the required notice is on file in the office of the City Clerk. City Council Staff Report CFD 88-2 June 2~, X989 Page 2 The other issues dealing with unit count and park acreage are still being considered at the respective commissions. Therefore, staff has not changed any of its calculations. spectfu l/^l(y submiDtted~, J//~ G~ ~,J• +~/Gfi/DVPG• Jerry Fulwood Deputy City Manager JHF:de Attachments ~ 4~ f~ RESOLUTION NO. ~9 - a~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING NECESSITY TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS, SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF A CCMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THE PROPOSITION TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY A SPECIAL TA7C LEVY TO PAY FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL FACILITIES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND GIVING NOTICE THEREON, AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDUP.ES AND CONDITIONS FOR CONDUCTING AN ELECTION WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Ihereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"I, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted a public hearing relating to the issuance of bonds to be secured by special taxes to pay for certain public capital facilities in a cort¢nunity facilities district, as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, said Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0. e8-2 Ihereinafter referred to as the ^District^1; ane, WHEREAS, at this time this legislative body is desirous to ~.~ a<~~- prv____ __ ..._.._ _.._ ..______r ._..__..~_ ~_ ..~ .. indebtedness, •to declare^the purpose for `said~debt,~^ andyto authorize the submittal of a combined proposition to the voters of said District, being the landowners of the proposed District, all as authorized and required by law; and, WHEREAS, a special election is to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "local Agency"1, at which time there will be submitted to the qualified electors of said District certain propositions relating to the authorization to levy a special tax and the incurring of a bonded indebtedness in order to pay for certain capital facilities in said District, pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as referenced above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: RECITALS SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. 14$4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 2 NECESSITY FOR BOND ISSUE SECTION 2. That this legislative body hereby expressly declares and skates that it is necessary to incur a bonded indebtedness as authorized under the terms and provisions of the "Mello- Roas Community Facilities Act of 1982", in order to finance the below described public capital facilities. PURPOSE OF ISSUE SECTION 3. That the purpose for the proposefl bonded indebtedness and facilities proposed to be financed through the issuance of said bonds, is generally described as follows: To finance the construction, installation and acquisition of certain drainage and flood control facilities, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acquisition where necessary. For further particulars, reference is made to the file onkikls.A "('TTV OF RAN('HO l`1 K'AMONQA. CCM4AUNTTY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2, DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES", a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. For all particulars, reference is made to said approved file. BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT SECTION 4. That the whole of the District will pay for the above referenced bonded indebtedness. A general description of the District is as follows: All property wtthin the boundaries of COt+J+tUNIT`f FACILITIES DISTRICT NC. 88-2, as shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map designated by the name of this Co1mnunity Facilities District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. /4 6C CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 3 BOND AMOUNT SECTION 5. That the amount of the proposed bonaea indebtedness, including the cost of the facilities, together With all incidental expenses, is generally as follows: SAID PROJECT FACILITIES, INCLUDING INCIDENTAL EXPENSES, SHALL NOT EXCEED $4,000,000.00. For further particulars, reference is made to the "COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REPORT", as on file in the Office of the City Clerk. BOND TERMS SECTION 5. That it is hereby further determined that bonds shall be issued, and the maximum term of bonds and/or any series shall not exceed forty 1401 years, and said bonds may be issued in differing series, at differing times. The maximum rate of interest to be paid on said _.,_~~ ^t ,.a tTn of nr of eitfi ar twelve percent 112}1 per annum or the maximum rate permitted by law at the time of sale of any of said bonds. The bonds, except where other funds are made available, shall be paid exclusively from the annual levy of the special tax, and are not secured by any other taxing power or funds of the Community Facilities District or the City. ELECTION SECTION 7. The proposition related to the incurring of the bonded indabteflness shall be consolidated with the proposition relating to the levy of the special tax, shall be combinefl Snto one ballot proposition, and shall be submitted to the qualified voters at a special election to be held on the 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 1989, and said election shall be a special mailed ballot election to be conducted by the City Clerk Ihereinaf ter referred to as the "Election Official"1. If the combined proposition for the levy of the special tax and the incurring /4~D CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 4 of the bonded indebtedness receive the approval of more than two-thirds l2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, bonds may be authorized, issued and sold for the purposes set forth herein and the special tax may be levied as provided for in the Resolution of Formation. BALLOT SECTION 8. That the ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A Shall community Facilities District No. 88-2, City of Rancho Cucamonga, be authorized to 11 incur a bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $A,000,000.00, to be paid by special taxes as established 6y the District, with interest rates not exceeding the maximum of hn~{voA by la a~ ~hn •imn of hn findnCe COnatrUCtiOn, dC(]U 161tlOn^no dnd installation of certain drainage and flood control facilities, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acquisition where necessary, 21 to levy special taxes to pay Eor said facilities and additional police protection services and/or any authorizefl anfl issued bonded indebtedness, and 31 establish an Article XIIIB appropriations limit equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which may be levied in any fiscal year? YES NO ~4~E CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 5 EXISTING TAX RATE AND APPORTIONMENT The existing tax rate and apportionment for the tax categories identified below, as previously approved for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 are as follows: SPECIAL TAX "A" - PUBLIC FACILITIES PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which aze identified as follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessor's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 3i of any year. 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the dat¢ ni •_hn n_l_n •n nhh n_W" the levy of" Special"Tax "A"~ is: lil owned by a public entity; lii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or liiil zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX "A" RATES The taxing classifications Eor the above Property Categories and the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rates for fiscal year 1989-90 are as foilows: TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $ 7,037 per year IMore than, 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " 14gfi CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 Sune 21, 1989 Page 6 TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE B . Residential Class II $ 768 per year (3,077-3,589 square Eeet of dwelling unit living areal " C . Residential Class III $ 576 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living areal" D . Residential Class ZV $ 461 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " E . Residential Class V $ 384 per year 12,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " o....: A,.nH el rte _~ VT C 960 n _ ar (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) " G. roennercial or industrial $ 2,030 per acre per year "" 2. UNDEVF,LOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $ 2,400 per acre per year """ " The square Eootage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living 5rara; ?x~insiva of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permitlsl issued Eor the dwelling unit. "" The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. 14$~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 7 ""* The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered Eor dedication to a public agency. SPECIAL TAX "B" - ADDITIONAL POLICE SERVICES All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "8". The maximum a uthorized Special Tax "B" rates £or fiscal year 1989-90 are as follows: TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $ 432 per year IMOre than, 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living areal A. Residential Class II $ 320 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " C. Residential Class III $ 240 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " D. Residential Class IV $ 192 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " E. Residential Class V $ 160 pet year (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " F. Residential Class VI $ 112 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living areal " G. Commercial or industrial $ 1,000 per acre per year "" V I ' CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 8 The maximum annual Special Tax "B" rates shall be subject to escalation each July 1 commencing July 1, 1990, at a rate not to exceed four percent (4}) per year. Special Tax "B" shall be levied annually so long as Special Tax "B" Revenues are necessary to pay for additional police services necessary to serve the properties located within the District. VOTE SECTION 9. Trtat the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after trte word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of trte prcposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as autrtorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION IJ. The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election (1f PlFlal CM1T11 nPT PINT and TPAdPT .ill CPTVt/'PC and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: Frepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. 2. Cause to be printed the requisite number of of Eic ial ballots, tally sheets and other necessary foams. 3. Furnish and address to mail official ballots to the Qualified electors of the Community Facilities District. 4. Cause the ofEic Sal ballots to be mailed, as required by law. 5. Receive the returns of the election and supplies. ~ 4~ L CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 7989 Page 9 6. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. 7. Canvass the returns of the election. e. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. 9, Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election 1RC Urred a5 Le6ult Of S@rV1Ce5 performed by the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. 10. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings anfl conduct of the election in the manner and fozm as required by law. -4~7 RESOLUTION NO. ~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AND ESTABLISHING THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, ANG AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WHEREP.S, a public hearing ha; been held and concluded, and the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO L'UCAMONGA• CALIFORNIA, Ihereina£ter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"1, is desirous at this time to proceed with the establishment of a community facilities district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Art of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, said Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"1; and, WHEREAS, this legislative body has further declared its intent that the authorized public facilities be financed through the issuance of bonds, said bonds secured by the levy of a special tax; and, WHEREAS, at any time before or after the formation of the District, this legislative b~,dy may accept advances of funds -___ _ ___ M1n .mv n n:.. ..: :.. ~ .. .^.~ _ . reimbursement and/or . repayment shall^ bey made £orY said advances until expressly set forth by agreement and/or resolution of this legislative body setting forth the amount, terms and conditions for any reimbursement and/or repayment shall be made for said advances until expressly set forth 6y agreement and/or Resolution of this legislative body settir.q forth the amount, terms and conditions for any reimbursement and/cr repayment; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there are less than twelve 1121 registere3 voters residing within the territory of the District, and have been for at least the preceding ninety (901 days, this legislative body is desirous to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the .,_ _ __±3 1_ndnyrn ors being rnn mta iified elertnrs as authorized by law; and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted to this legislative body Ear its consideration, a Purchase/Financing Agreement by and between the District and The Caryn Company, which would authorize the District to acquire the public capital facilities described herein pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in said Agreement. l~-g ~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: RECITALS SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this legislative body does hereby establish and declare the formation of the Con¢nunity Facilities District known and designated as "COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIS'TRT-CT NO. 88-2". BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT SECTION 3. That the boundaries and parcels of land in which the public facilities are to be provided and on which special taxes will be levied in order to pay the casts and expenses Eor said public Facilities are generally described as follows: nii pi .+pe~iy wi Li. i.. J. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ~NO•uu88~2, as shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, saifl map designated by the name of this Convnunity Facilities District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The boundary map of the proposed District has been filed pursuant to Sections 3111 and 3113 of the Government Code of the State of California in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, at Page of Book of the Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts for said County. DESCRIPTION OF F?.CLITIES SECTION 4. A general description of the public capital facilities which this legislative body is authorized by law to construct, own or operate, which are the facilities to be improved under these proceedings, are generally described as follows 14g ~- CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 Sune 21, 1989 Page 3 The construction, installation and acquisition of certain drainage and flood control facilities, together with appurtenances anfl appurtenant work, including acquisition where necessary. Far further particulars, reference is made to the Eile entitled "CITY OF RANCHO FACILITIES DISTRICT NO FACILITIES", a Copy Of w] Office of the City particulars, reference approved file. CUCAMONGA, COMMUNITY . 88-Z, DESCRIPTION OF rich is on file in the Clerk. For all is made to said The facilities, as above-described, are facilities which this legislative body is authorized by law to contribute revenue to or to construct, own or operate. It is hereby further found and determined that the proposed facilities are necessary to meet the demands and needs of this local Agency, _ _~~: ~a installing the` facilities includes incidental expenses consisting of the costs of planning and designing the facilities, including the costs of environmental evaluations thereof, all costs associated with the establishment of the District, the issuance of bonds, the determination of the amount of any special taxes to be levi:d, the cost of collecting any special taxes, and costs otherwise incuzred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, together with any other expenses incidental to the acquisition, construction, completion and inspection of the facilities. UBSCRIPT UJN OF SEEVICES SECTION 5. That it is the further intention of this legislative body to provide certain services that are in addition to those provided in the territory of the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services to be provided is as follows: ~ a-~ M CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 4 Police protection services which are in addition to the extent to which said services are currently provided to the territory within the progosefl District. The costs of said services shall include the performance by employees of all functions, including operation and maintenance. SPECIAL TAX SECTION 6. Except where Funds are otherwise available, a special tax, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the proposefl District, is hereby authorized, subject to voter approval, to be levied annually within the boundaries of said District. The pzoposed special tax to be levied within said District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Government Code of the State of California. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the __ ~..i~ 4n LAn pzaro- ~p~ ~ _.... ~ ...___ __ attached end~incorpozated Exhibit M"A", which sets forth in suEf icient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed District to estimate the probable annual amount and the maximum annual amount that said person will have to pay for said facilities. Said special tax shall be utilized to pay for the construction, expansion, rehabilitation or purchase of the public capital facilities and services to be provided, and/or to secure a bonded indebtedness which shall be utilized to finance such public capital facilities. The special taxes herein authori~ad shaft he collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority In any case of delinquency as applicable for ed valorem taxes. I ~U,v CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 5 Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real pr opei ty in the District and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien cancelled in accordance w.i th law or until collection of the tax by the legislative Cody ceases. PREPARATION OF ANNUAL TAX ROLL SECTION 7. The name, address and telephone number of the office, department or bureau which will be responsible for preparing annually a current roll of special tax levy obligations by Assessor's parcel numbez~ and which shall be responsible for est i:nating future special tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.1 of the ar_cas Eollows~ ... ~••~ /~y ~~ ... ~y--•u-••-yI ASSESSMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 TELEPHONE: 17141 989-1851 FINDING OF VALIDITY SECTION e, it is hereby further determined by this legislative body that all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of the law, and specifically t.*.e pro•:i~ions of t.*.e "Mello-Roos Comma.^.ity Facilities Act of 1982", and that this finding and determination is made pursuant to the provisions and authorization of Section 53325.1 of the Government Code of the State of California. 4~a'o CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 6 SUBSTITUTION FACILITIES SECTION 9. The description of the public capital facilities, as set forth herein, is general in its nature. The final nature and location of improvements and facilities will be determined upon the preparation of final plans and specifications. The final plans may show substitutes is lieu uf, or modification to, the proposed work in order to accomplish the works of improvemen~, and any such substitution shall not be a change or modification in the proceediny~ .:n long as the facilities provide a service substantially similar to that as set forth in this Resolution. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE SECTION 10. Ary landowner or resident who feels that the amount or formula of the special tax is in error may file a notice with the Agency aPPeeil..y . evy .. Si:oG i:.l .: appeals panels of 3 members, as appointed by the Agency, will then meet and promptly review tRe appeal, and if necessary, meet with the applicant. If the Findings of the Appeals Board verify that the tax should be modified or changed, a recortanendation at that time will he made to the Agency and, as appropriate, the special tax levy shall be corrected, and iE applicable in any case, a refund shall be granted. ELECTION SECTION 11. This legislative body herewitR submits the levy of the spe^_ial tax to the qualified electors of the District, said electors being the landowners of the proposed District, with each landowner having one 111 vote for each acre or portion thereof land which he or she owns within the Community Facilities Dlstriet. 14gP CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 27, 1989 Page 7 This legislative body hereby further directs that the ballot proposition relating to the levy of the above referenced special tax be combined and consolidated with the proposition relating to the incurring of a bonded indebtedness. This Resolution shall not constitute the notice of the election and the Resolution declaring the necessity to incur the bonded indebtedness shall constitute the notice of the combined election relating to the bonded indebtedness and authorization for the special tax levy. PURCHASE/FINANCING AGREEMENT SECTION 17. This legislative body hereby approves the Purchase/Financing Agreement by and between the District and The Caryn Company, the original of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes the execution thereof by the Mayor and City Clerk, acting on behalf of the District. ~ 4$ ~ RESOLUTION NO. ~~~P RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT i'.:IEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNL4, (hereinafier referred to as the '7egisiative bogy of the local Agency"), has previously declazed its intention and ordered the prepazation of a "Report" relating to the initiatlon of proceedings to create a Community Facilities District pursuant ro the terms and provisions of the "Me1lo-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities Distrito shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Districf9; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, the furnishing of certain facilities and services, and all other related matters has been given, and a "Report", as ordered by this Agency, has been presented and considered, and at this time it is hereby determined that certain changes and modifications in the Resolution of Intention and proceedings should be ordered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals aze all true and correct. SECTION 2. That it is in the best public interest and conveniences to order certain changes and modifications to the proceedings and Resolution of Intention, as they relate ro the formation of the District, and said changes and modifications are as set Eorth in the final "Report" submitted and herein approved, entitled "COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REP'ORT'. SECTION 3. That the proceedings, Resolution of Intention and "Report" as now presented, shall stand for all future proceedings as the Resolution of Intention, proceedings and "Report" for the District. I 1 V RESOLUTION NO. S~ / ~ ~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN PRELIMINARY FBVDINGS AND PASSING UPON PROTESTS WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL/FORNL4, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agenty"), has previously declared iffi intention and ordered the prepazation of a 'Report" relating to the initiation of proceedings to create a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Me1lo-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities District shaE hereinafter be referred to as COMMLTAiITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notlce of a public hearing relating to the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, the furnishing of certain facilities and services, and all other related matters has been given, and a "Report", as ordered by this Agency, has been presented ro this Agency and has been made a part of the record of the hearing on the Resolution of Intention ro establish said District; and, WHEREAS, it has been further determined that written protests by fifty percent (5096) or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is greater, residing within the boundaries of the proposed District, or by owners representing one-half (I /2) or more of the area of land proposed ro be included in said tnstria and nor exeu~pc fruw iue s}xti.;ei in,. Lave ,wt ~.~ .ria;.ad, :y,d, WHEREAS, all Communications relating to the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, and the types of facilities and services, as well as the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax, have been considered, and at this time this legislative body is desirous to proceed with the establishment of the District; and, WHEREAS, at this time there has further been submitted to this legislative body, pursuant to an environmental evaluations, a NEGATIVE DECLARATION on the project, together with any comments received during the public review process relating to the formation of this District. NOW,'fHliltliNORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. T`~~t the above recitals are all tme and correct. SECTION 2. That written protests have not been Eiled by fifty percent (5096) or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is greater, or property owners of more ~4~S CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CFD 88-2 June 21, 1989 Page 2 than one-half (1/2) of the area of the land within the proposed District and not exempt from the special tax. SECTION 3. Except where changes and modifications have been made, all protests and objections aze hereby overruled and denied. SECTION 4. It is hereby further determined by this legislative body to proceed with the formation and establishment of the District, formally known and designated as "COMMUNITY FACILTITES DISTRICT NO. 88.2". SECTION 5. The "Report", as now submitted is hereby approved and is made a part of the record of the hearing, and is ordered to be kept on (Ile with the transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection. SECTION 6. It is hereby Further determined by this legislative body that all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in rnnformity with the requirements of law, and spedflcaEy the provisions of the "Me1lo-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1962", and this iiuuiu6 is uwue Yw auea,i iu ii,e Yiuviaiw~a auu auuui~i<.diiwi Ji Section 53325.1 of the Government Code of the State of California. SECTTON 7. It is hereby further determined by this legislative body that the proposed capital project facility and services are necessary to meet the increased demands placed upon this local agency as a result of new development and/or rehabilitation within the District. SECTION B. Based upon the initial study, the rnmments received thereon and the Negative Declaration for the project, it is further determined that the proceedings relating to the formation of the Community Facilities District will not have a significant effect on the environment. The City Manager is hereby directed to immediately cause a Notice of Determination to be filed in the Ofhce of the County Clerk. ~~BT Exh~Tk "A" REPORT: duly 1989 3460 Days SPECIAL DISCLOSURE 0 Agreed Agreed TAXFS BY BUII,DER: FEMA: Amended Purchase Working With SfaR Agreement Needs Park PARKS: 5 Acres Per 1000 3 Acres Per 1000 Commission Approval DRAINAGE iLE~'EL DEBT Agreed Agreed SERVICE): NORTH ETIWANDA Conservative Wail For Approval SPECIFIC PLAN: ApproachUnNl Approved '~.. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TRACT NO.135651~ BRENTWOOD COLLECTION NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX AND ASSESSMENTS The Gty of Rancho Curatnonga, the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Edwanda School Dishier have each completed proccvdings to form Community Facilities Districts pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982". Each of the Community Facilities District is krrown and designated as follows City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 88-2; Foothill Fire Protection DisMet Community Facilities Distrito No. 8&1; and Community Facilities District No. 2 of the Etiwanda School District. Thepurpose of each DisMB shalllR b assist in the Flnancingofcertain public capital facilitiesand servicesgenerally described as follows: RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.B&2 PUBLIC CMITAL FACILITIES-The construction, installation and aoluisilionof certain drairwge and Flood control facilities, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acquisition where nenssary. SERVICES -law Enforcement protection services which are in addition to the extent to which such services are currently provided to the [crtitory within the Rancho Cucamonga CFD. It is estimated the special [ax for this district will be between 5380 and $1088 per year dependent upon the square footage of the home. FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILI77E5 DISTRICF NO. B&1 PUBLIC CAPITAL FACILITIES - The constmction of a fire station, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, including acquisition where necessary. SERVICES -Fire protection and suppression services (including emergency medical service and such other services as Foothill Fire Dislritl may be authorized by law to provide) which are in addition to the extent to which such services are curtently provided to the lertilory within the Foothill Fire Protecfian District CFD. It is estimated the special tax For This district will be between $140 and $220 per year dependent upon the square footage of the home. ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.2 PUBLIC CAPITAL FACILITIES - Acgwsition, design, construction, improvement, modification or rehabilitation of school (arilities, including the acquisition of uhool sites. It is estimated the special tax (or This disMct will be approximately $600 per year based upon the square footage of the home. The bt which Buyers are purchasing is located within the proposed boundaries of these DistricN. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TRACT' NO. 13565 1-4 BRENTWOOD COLLECTION Page 2 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT EACH YEAR SPECIAL TAXES WILL BE LEVIED AGAINST ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DLSIRICIS, INCLUDING BUYERS PARCEL, FDR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE Ct751$ AND EXPENSES OF SAID PUBLIC CAPITAL FAt::ILTFfES AND SERVICES, AS APPLICABLE. Additionally, Ranclq Cunamor~ has established Lighting and Lardsrape Maintenanre DistriCls pursrunt m the provi- siore of the "landscaping and Lighting Act of 19TT. These Maintenenace DtstrkLs are desigra0ed as Landscape Main- lerrmace District No. 7 and Shcel Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. t and 2. The purpose of these Mainlenanre Dis- uicts is massist in the finandng of the mainteranceof certain parkway and median landscaping and public park improve menrs and maintenance costs aM energy charges for street lights. YOU ARE HEREBY N077F~D THAT IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE SPECIAL TAXES, AN ANNUAL MAINTE- NANCE ASSESSMENT SHALL BE LEVIED ACAWST ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE BOIJNDARtFS OF THE MAIN- TENANCE DISIRiCTS, INCLUDING BUYERS PARCEL. THE. ESF6.4ATED ASSESSMENT FOR BUYERS' PARCEL FOR THE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/9015 6606. Spedal Taxes for services and assessments for maintenance are ongoing. This project is within an area desigraled as a Flood plain and may require Flood insurance through your homeowners insurance policy. If the Buyers have any grrestions regarding any of the Community Facilities DisM[ta or the Maintenance District, the Buyers are invited m call the mllowing. Questions regarding either the Ranch Cucamonga CFD or the Rancho Cuamonga Maintenance Districts: City of Rancho Cucamonga Assesment Revenue Administration sole) ovoeaSt Ext. 215 or 216 Questions regarding tM Foothill Fire CFD: Foothill Hre Protection IlisMct (714)987-2535 Questions regarding the ENwanda School ITstrkt CFD (714)899-245t - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1988 T0: C1ty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: JuQy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566-1 AND -3, LOCATED SOUTN OF 24TH STAEET, NEST OF CHERRY AVENUE RECONEIUATION: It is recaawended that CTTy Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work 1n connection with the Fonsrtian of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACXGIXIUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a Resolution ordering the work 1n connection with the Foraetion of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 for Tentative Tract 13566-1 and -3, located south of 24th Street, west of CAerry Avenue. The developer of the suD~ect tracts has been notified of w,.` ..tii ,. w..1... I,.. w-.t1 anA .nn~i ~~e u.r .1 en ,v,e~..l at fir e~f~ TM attached resolution etso approves the F1na1 Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 89-232. Res s fitted, r c RHM:J ALWChaent ~~9 RESOLUTION N0. ~ / -~~ Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California did on the 17th day of May, 1989, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 89-233 to order the Lherein described work in connection with the Formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, which Resolution of Intention No. 89-233 was duly and legally published in the tine, fora and Wanner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Nearing", was duly and legelly posted in the tine, farW, Wanner, location, and nunber as required by law, as appears froW the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file 1n the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly Wailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the inproveWents described in said Resolution of intention No. 89-233, according to the naWes and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last nailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, which said copies were duly Walled 1n the tilde, forty, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in LAC asst ~~ ~C LF~ rH~ r1u..L. anA NHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and docuWentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts 1n this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the conteWplated work and the benefits to be derived therefroW and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho CucaWOnga, as follows: SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Cauncll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 'hat the public Interest and convenience requires the Formation of said District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-233, be done and nwde; and SECTION 2: Be tt further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s re y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be 1t flirther resolved that the assessments and Wethod of assessmenl:Tn jh~ngtneer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4; Be 1t finally resolved that said assessments shalt not begin until a tt er 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. r~~ cln of RANCrw cucluloNGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 TENTATIYE TMCT NOS. 13566-1 8 -3 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Highways Cade, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the establishment of a Landscape Maintenance District for the North Etiwanda area. The District will ortglnally comprise of the boundaries of the Tentative Tract Nos. 13566-1 and -3. Areas ta be included in the work program are the trees and planting within certain rights-of-wyy of streets as determined by the City; street trees wl thin street rights-of-way and within dedicated tree maintenance easements as required by specific plans or by the City Council. The public parks, the greenway and paseo systems, community gateways, regional and community trail systems including lighting, signing, striping and all other Improvements such as play equipment, fences, walls, etc. within those systems; such similar areas as required by the Specific Plan or by the City Council or as dedicated by various subdivisions. At present, the ortglnal Dtstrlct will consist of vacant lots. The actual work programs for these tentative tracts will comaence at such time as the tracts are recorded and needed Improvements are completed and accepted by the tiro The work program generally exciudes the parkways landscaping (except the street trees) adloining the fronts and sides of single family residences, ad,loining multifamily residential units and ad~olning commercial and instituttonai development which will be maintained by those developments. The District will eventually include the majority of the areas included within the North EtTwanda Specific Plan areas and other areas generally comprised of prnpertles from Day Creek Channel t0 the East City boundary and from Highland Avenue to North City boundary. SECTION 3. SCOPE OF NOAK The areas 11stad above will became part of the active work program at such Gime as the speCiflC areas are dedicate8 to the and acClpted by City. Tho normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, the areas improved by the developer with landscaping, irrigation an4 other required ~....)' improvements, then after a period of mintenance by the developer as determined by the City Engineer, the acceptance of maintenance by the Maintenance District. There will be a lag time from the original dedication until the District actually begins the maintenance of the areas. On certain work program areas where abutting properties will never be developed, the District may install the needed improvements as required by the City Council and maintain the same. The plans and specifications for all Improvements within the work program areas to be installed 6y the developer will be completed by the developer at their cost for the Individual areas to be maintained within the subdivision and will be approved by the Comaunity Development Department. Annual Engineer's Reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council defining the specific work program for each year and its estimated cost. As development proceeds within the District, the areas to be maintained by the District will increase and sa will the cost; however the number of units will also increase. The estimated main*enance cost and estimated assessment rate per unit for the original District and the completed District are tabulated herein after. The assessment rate is expected to vary year to year as more areas are annexed to the District until such time as all the properties within the ultimate district boundary are annexed, after which the assessment rate should rematn constant excluding cost of living increase. Maintenance Activities Detail maintenance activities on the areas t0 be maintained by the District consist of providing for Lhe life, growth, health, and beauty of the iandscaping including: cultivation, irrigation, trimming spraying, ICI Ill IL 1111) JI •I CY 1.IIly IVI VIaiYJG VI i1..l Yij, ~~\ nL tea ~In'w. .. ~-A IJ1. debris and other solid waste; maintenance, repair, energy costs, and replacement as necessary of all required lighting within the park, greemvay, paseo and troll system; removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cuitivated areas; repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred by the District for original Improvement construction except for certain nominal areas as mentioned 1n Section 3. The cost of any new construction will have negligible effect on the total assessment of Lhe Dtstrlct due to its scope 1n comparison with the overall District vrork program areas. Based on data from other titles artd from the City of Rancho Cucamonga far Landscape Maintenance Districts and from the review of proposed work program areas, it is estimated that based on current dollars, the maintenance cost for assessment purposes, estimated areas to be maintained and the estimated number of assessment units will be as follows: I ~~ A. Original District As no dedication will be aside and as no improvement will be done during the tentative stage of the saps, no cost will be incurred for the original District. B. Phase One Construction (At recordation of Tracts 13566-I and -3) The estimated costs for the original District comprising of Tract Nos. 13566-1 and -3 plus 24th Street fray Nardsan Bullock Road to Cherry Avenue/City boundary are shown below: Equestrian Trail (including 50,034 SF D S0.05 = S 2,501,70 fences, sow strips and portals Parkways (including slopes 8 aanument walls) 218,448 SF 8 f0.30 = 565,534.40 Traes 572 EA 8 f5.00 = f 2,860.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST 570,896.10 C. Complete District The estimated costs (as current dollars) for the District upon completion of all areas within North Etiwanda are as shown below: Parkways, trails, 9reenways, etc. plus neighborhood parks 8,100,028 SF 0 (0.35/SF ~ (2,835,010 Conammlty Darks 8 60Y of 1,481,040 SF 888,624 SF D f0.35/SF f 311,019 ~TdS ~ ISYg SECTION 5. ASSESSFENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of the Assessment 0lstrict are attached to this report and labeled "Landscape Maintenance District Na. 7 "Exhibit A" and "Exhibit B." These dlagrass aro hereby incorporated into the text of this report. Precise lot dimensions are included in the referenced tract maps and Assessor's records. The District will originally comprise Tentative Tract Nos. 13566-1, and -3. Once the tracts are recorded, it will become a part of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. ?he assessment rate after recordation of the tract will be as shown to Section 6, phase one construction. Additional tracts will be annexed into the District after tts formation. The final configuration of the District may include much of the North Etlwanda Spetlfic Plan and properties casprlsing the l53 area from Day Creek east to the City boundary and Highland Avenue north to the National Forest limits. A copy of the proposed final District boundary is attached to this report as "Exhibit C." SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS A. ORIGINAL DISTRICT Total Annual Cost f0 Assessment Units = 0 Assessment rate = 0 8. PHASE ONE (at recordation of Tract Nos. 13566-1 and -3) Maintenance costs for Phase One comprising Tracts 13566-1 and 3 plus 24th Street from Hardman Bullock Road to Cherry Avenue are found to be of specific benefit to all property within the District in accordance with the following relations: Total Annual Cost (Section 4) f70,896.10 Assessment Units Summary Land Use Assessment Units/Unit Assessment Units Dwelling Units 113 1 113 TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 113 Assessment Rate (70,896.10 ~ 113 (627.40 Effective Assessments 113 per year or (52.28 per month per dwelling unit Other Developed Land Uses = NONE Estimated assessments arc for comparison only. Actual assessment will be set by public hesring each year in June and will be based on actual maintenance expenses and developed land use suaemrles. C. Complete District Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of spet141c benefit to all property within the District In accordance wtth the following relations: /~ 1 Land Use Assessment Units Sisiary Assessment Assessment Units/Unit Units Residential Dwell ing Unit 1 Assessment Units Summary Land use Units Assessment Assessment Units/Unit Units Cwelling Units 5,345 1 5,346 Other Land Uses e.g. Commercial, inch tutinnall 80 Acres 2 Units/Acre 160 TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 5,506 Assessment Rates ~ f3,146,029 s 5,506 a 5571.38 Effective Assessments 5,506 per year or 547.62 per month per dwelling unit Other 0eveloped Land Uses NOME Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessment will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be based an actual maintenance expenses and developed sand use summaries. 15S eXNB1T •A• ASSESSMENT pIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MARITENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 _._.. ' TRACT NOS. 13566-1 8 13566-3 l , ~, ~~~'~ ~~~.I ' : L~ : L : ~_ _ . _ ~~-: ~ -~II- :~ __- .~, ---- C,~~ EXF~IT "A" ~gS~SSN~ENT DIAGRAM 24TH STREET ~._-- ;-_ ~,,.,;.-_:~,.,-_,..__ WARDMANBULLOCKRD. -°~° :,~~~-_,~~:-= TO CHERRY AVE. ¢• J ' '_. ~' ~ - EXFIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIP.GRAN1 LAtiDSCA?c MAINTENAtiC°_ DISTFICT NO, i ~~~~ °7JN7 AN7 Tn_c h1FINSc1FNCE ~~~ ~• •_-~''`":•-`^''"`` 13566.1 & 13566-3 ~, _ EXF~IT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~.=.^^SC ".'_ L:,"-.:*:T~':ArJC_ DISTRICT tCO. ; ' ~ ~I ~ I j I L I S I G i 7 I° 9 I /D i:/ I :~ I /3 ;_ i ~ _ _2.~ ._i ,~ j ~ ( I ,; /GZ /_C /45 ~~ { /'=~ _ .. p ' 3 /'7 / i ~ o /~'i L7 ~ ~ 1J 43 / I ^ ~www G-.~Ur:7 h':7 7=== !.(AIV c4F.N.. TRACT 13566.1 & 13566.3 ~, - - ~~ .~- `~~ ~~ I LV +E" ~. 11E9~1'IDI IA161A1P6 16an}1611d tffi110Cf 7 9fOLT vscs-1 c -) nose lam1a16 oP n6 rWSr twr oP ]16 vel 101)P oP SPCr1oN n. SAN eaawwm l613IU3Allr 3N 1}01 CT1Y aP OANCIO QA6lQI'A, ~Y OF SAN N8AXA16IItA~ 3019E oP ova3vlaaA, 1oce91n13 N3111 lnr s, 11+ACm No. xae, As tm NM P[IID 1N 6001( ]~, 01(y+ 6B Or IP04, POmIMR OP SA]0 fII.1NY. 1J3. A4 SNO3N ON A MAP PIIID ]N 8001( '!]. PAf~ ri Al6I ~O Q NCOD1m 0 96i11EY. 161 oP SAID o]fMIY, ~ A3 WfIOYB: OB'INlIIG AT n6 NONIffi~P OOtNGi OP SAID N071 NA)P; nO51CE NON1H 89' 11' d6^ FAST 1126.5] Fffi'l 10 116 eA31 [.06 aP SAID N091 Fq[F; 'IfOl6]: S9[AN 0• 16' Ol" NFST 1611.00 I+0!f MONO SAID PAST 1036; '00562 116 )OfSQ/1NC NIRSGS: 3. ltalOl 89' tl' S9^ NBYl' 15'/.99 IM1E'P 10 A WINl ON A NOM+O9tilI1' 1725.00 N101' AAO1V5 096196 1100' IS OONQV6 1G41110Y. A NAD311i. 'OD SAID NOIl' 0006 2. NOAD~ILP 6.07 Pte' N1I0: SAID CVN6 7160Uf21 A CBm01L NEIL OP 0' OB' 07": ]. NON4AMN7l' N01013 89. 51' S9^ N03P 50.00 1Bf 10 A kO1N1' QI A /07F•DY7871 1673.0! l001 BARB m{116 71013' I3 ~A1VE 1641770.1, A laves. n) SAID f011)P NOU6 9WM e9' tl' S9+ 0131: A. SOUO00X 11.31 Pte' ALO1C SAID 011116 716~Ri1 A C)NNAL ANiE OP 0• !)' l3^. 5. 3RN0111[11IP I0]fDi 66' ]]' 06^ M<g1 196.~I P<'dl': 6. 9UON 6]' Ol' 09^ 1~1171.M IA`ll'i '!. IIORM 69• /1' S9^ M@P 170.00 111'1 e. NOA.'pl 70. 26' A9+ 1130 90.d 7ldl'1 9. 9W01 67' I7' 16^ N®1' 65.11 im'! 1V. `M/1:1 OO' U' 11>' rfilC tVJ.Yi IfYI') 11. 90N01 65• 3)' )]^ MBI' 23.00 PQT 10 A PD7NP ON A lilYdR.1711 1690.00 100P MOlm 076N6 71613' 7S m10W6 G61EQYr A 0AO7A2. 10 311ID FO1M' BPAIB 50001 65. 3]~ l]+ M361J 13. 901A166Y 70.79 P7d1 Ai1110 SAID 01606 1HPaA1 A C811ML AIQL OP 0' ~3~ 17^; 1). 9a)IN 65. 51' 16+ 1~1 23.00 6@li 11. NC6411 69. 6)' 19" N@I' 155.66 IQ.'! 10 116 ild! LII76 OP SAN 1®1 IPV Q 116 0.R 1aIPi 1107•~ NOlml 0• 16r 61" Q6P 16)1.63 fRf 11TH' SAID N681 iJ116 10116 W110' OI BCII61131C. I63N ~U.0301 5/10/69 ^ EXF~IT "C" - -- 'i - '-' -' ~~ CRV BOUNDARY t, i ti I j i i /~ ~~ ~~ -' _ _ ~ . ~ i ~~ ~ ', I i~ I _ -. r i I RIMY .ten ..< R ~ ` IRGILAND AVENUE _ - ~ ' ~ -' -~ lD(3X - pYYFAC;AC *~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 17~/ - i0.RA 4'~$A J_, ~' _ L~j6 - CAXYX i,~ ~~~ ^~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF ftEPOftT ~~' ~~M~°~ o ~ f ~ z V I> 19'17 ~ June 14, 1959 TO: Ole yor and Members of City Council FROM: Jerry R. Crent, Building Official SUBJECT: CONTINUATION OF APPEAL $ NOTICE D ORDER OF BUILDING OFFICIAL - DANGEROUS BUILDING - 9768 CENTER - APN 41077-401-34 STATUS: Per Field inspection on 6/11/99 by Carlos Silva, Rehabilitation Specialist, structure and all debris have been removed. Owner has complied with Notice and Order o[ Building Official. JG:I1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT FOR A %ERISCAPE ORDINANCE I. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council review the concept for the er scope r finance and directs staff to initiate ordinance preparation. tt. ABSTRACT: In response to direction from the City Council, staff recamme~n s that the City approach the subject of water conservation to the landscape by 1) adopting a "Xeriscape" Ordinance and 2) preparing Guidelines which implement the Ordinance. Both documents would be pre Dared simultanreously and presented to the Council as one package. III. XERISCAPE ORDINANCE CONCEPT: The ordinance can be drafted similar to the Ctty of tos Angeles %eriscape Urdinance wnuh encourages reduction in water consumptfgn through a variety of techniques. Points would be awarded for the various techniques and each protects' landscape and irrigation plans must achieve a minimum number of points. The plan check process would require the landscape architect to certify as to the °claimed" points under the ordinance. Techniques: 1. Low gallonage irrigation system in ma,)ority of planted areas; such as, stream rotor, drip, trickle, micro. 2. Plants placed or grouped according to their watering needs. 3. Automatic controller for irrigation system. 4. Tensiometer/anenameter/raincup used in combination with automatic controller. 5. Turf 1lmited to no more than 25 percent of total planted area. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT FOR A XERISCAPE ORDINANCE June 21, 1989 Page 2 6. Water conserving plants used in 75 percent of total planted area. 7. Use of reclaimed/recycled water. 8. Irrigation system designed to water plants according to their needs. Landscape materials which require different watering needs are irrigated by separate control valves. 9. Hardscape (non-Irrigated) surfaces, such as natural alluvial rock and special decorative Daving materials (i.e., brick, aggregate finish concrete, tile, interlocking pavers). 10. Where turf is used, utflizaticn of warm season grasses. such as Marathon or other hybird fescues. 11. Woodchips, bark or other mulch on top of exposed soil, such as underneath shrubs. 12. Soil amendments to improve water holding capacity. Upon concurrence of the Council by minute action on this concept, staff will immediately prepare Ordinance and Guidelines. Re p ully fit , B d Bu er Cit anner BB;OC:,Is l~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: June 21, 1989 c~"^+o,~ o o ~ A Y p F'.. U Z ~- __ ~a To: Mayor, Members of City Cuncil, and City Manager From: Joa Schultz, Community Services Manager Subject: PARK WATCH PROGRAM Authorize Community Services Department staff to implement a PARKS WATCH PROGRAM within the Clty parks in cooperation with the Sheriff Department. Parks Watch ie a crime prevention program which enlists the active participation of citizens Sn cooperation with law enforcement to reduce crime within the perk system. There are two primary goals of implement i.ng PARKS WATCH: The first is to reduce vandalism within the park eyetem. Vandalism is a menace to park end recreation operation. Its seemingly irrational causes and destructive results reduce recreation opportunity and increase park maintenance expenditures, The second goal of Park Watch is to create an environment where people care about each other, their parka and their community. The city can proact to vandalism by implementing PARK WATCH . we can accomplish a program throughout the City whereby the Community Services Department informs the citizens of our intent to curb vandellem within the park eyetem by meeting with homeowners associations, service clubs and use the Grapevine to communicate our message of PARK WATCH. Appropriate eignage will be posted at ell parks informing citizens to WATCH THEIR PARK and report all cases of suspicious behavior to the sheriff's department. The Citizen Patrol will also be asked to part Scipete in the program. PARR WATCH June 21, 1989 Page Two The youth, park users and neighborhood residents who are encouraged to covEent on how to prevent vandalism will be more likely to use PARR WATCH as wa intend it to be used--- watch their local park--take pride in it--and report people who abuse "their" facility. Why Parka WatcY.? • over 4o million crimes are committed every year and the number is still growing. • Thera can't be a law enforcement officer on every corner, so citizen involvement is essential to combat thin social crisis. • By cooperating with each other and the Sheriff's flapartment, people can help fight crime in their community the moat effective way helots it begins. A brochurs will be devalop•d ^imilar to the attached. Pleaea feel tree to comment on what should be included and/or excluded. Thank yov. Respectfully submitted, c_i Joe chultz, Community Services Manager JS:bs / C T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: To: From: By: Subject: ecommendat June 21, 1989 cox^MO,~ ~~ ' 7r oi, P Ff ~ Z J'j D 1977 Mayor, Members of City Council and City anagar Toe Schultz, Community Services Mannger ~~-~ Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator) Consideration of Sidewalk Improvements in Conjunction With Development oP Don Tapia Park That City Council provide direction on the development of sidewalk improvements on Alta Guests and Valle Vista Drives and provide a funding source should the work be authorized. Backaround• A ten member committee of Red Hill residents davalopefl a conceptual design for Don Tapia Park (formally called creekside Park). Tha committees design for the park was approved at the May 17, 1989 City Council meeting. The committee requested cons ifleration be granted for the completion of sidewalks on Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista Drives. The sidewalks would connect the park to eaeeline Road to the north and Valle Vista Elementary School to the south as shown on Exhibit A. This Stem was deferred by Council with the request that estimated cost and potential funding sources be provided for the work. The City~s Design Engineering Department reviawafl the proposed area and developed a preliminary estimate cf probable coat to be ± $95,000.00. Tha figure represents sidewalk improvements consistent with City Standards end would require retaining walls and fencing along a portion of the improvement. This factor contributes eignificnntly to the cost of the work. The estimate does not include acquisition of R-O-W. Additional research end title reports would ba required to develop those coat. Should Council desire an estimate for this item probable costs can be developed. Potential funding sources Yor the work could be derived Prom 1) use of the 1911 Act to condemn adjacent property owner, 2) Reallocation of Gas Tax monies from already approved maintenance projacte, 3) Application for a grant under the Transportation Development Act and finally, 4) Use of unallocated General Fund revenue. Items for Council to consider under each item are: Usa of Lhe 1911 Act would require condemnation of land owned by Cucamonga Water District. The land is outside of the park site. The Water District made the park a feasible City project by providing a long term lease et a dollar a year for the land the park will be developed on. To take advantage of this agreement and then condemn land outside of the agreement could pose a problem. Second, use of Gas Tax monies would require deferment of previously approved maintenance projects. Third, allocations under the Transportation Development Act have bean raqusatad by the Public Safety Committee to ba used for handicap access. Finally, the fourth item, use of General Fund Revenue is limited. Use of this fund is usually for emergency item(s). Based on the cost for the proposed sidewalk work and the need to adjust already tended projacte to fund the work; City Council may consider that, eide•.alks in the Rod Rill area nova uuL Laeu aayuia au iu Liu ynai.. T'a~ia acaa wan Lu maintain a rural atmosphere and it might be appropriate to consider this; based on coat(s) and lack of funding. I will ba available to receive your direction end/or answer any questions you may have. Thank you. SS:DL:tp ca: Russ Maguire, City Engineer ~~8 EXHIBIT A B A S E L I N E R O A D UCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL ROPOSED SIDEWALK ~' W Q _~ G ~I O J XISTING SIDEWALK /~ 9 YALLE VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL v /TO n A MI~TJl1 l.T l!T A AA/lUl~ A STAFF REPORT l."`_•q, ~•~' ~.~ ~~ r LL ~~ F F ~ 2 Date: June 21, 1989 - -" 197i ' To: Mayor, Members of the City Council, City Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager By: Ratan McGUira-Emery, Associate Park Planner subject: Preservation of Historic Grape Vineyards Recommendations That the Community Services staff review future park designs for preservation of significant historical plant material. Backoround• Historically, the area now known ae Rancho Cucamonga played e significant role in the developaent of California's Wina industry. Not too aany years ego, while driving along olE Foothill Aoolevard, silo after wile of grape vineyards could be seen periodically interrupted by lush citrus grouts. Toflay, Lheee vineyards end grouse hove Lean replaced by the commercial, industrial and rasldential developments typical .....A. __._ ~__.._ ~- - -.. .., particularly San Bernardino and ^itiverei~lercountias. It has been the practice, when planning the City's parks, that significant tree species be preserved whenever possible to allow historical influence as well as provide large, mature trees giving shade cover. Examples of tree preservation are: 1) the eucalyptus trees at Windrows Park which were planted to provide a "windrow^ or wind protection for the area's agricultural plantings, 2) the California Pepper trees at Groves Park which originally provided sun protection for the local agricultural use, and 3) the Olive trees at I.a Mission Park that were a part of the La Mission labor camp which housed laborers for the local vineyards. in addition to those elgnificant plantings already mentioned, a portion of a grape vineyard and perhaps a citrus grove in future park sites would ba consistent with the City's attempt to commemorate the historical significance o! the Rancho Cucamonga area for future generations. I I O Staff Report 6/21/89 page two Potential park locations currently under consideration for representative plant preservation axe 1) the arboretum at the future Central Park where an historical nature walk and interpretive center could be planned, and 2) NorthEaet community Park, where a small sample of Citrus trees still exist (moat of the grove was burned in the Texas Range fire in September, 1988). As always, I am available to answer questions and/or receive further direction on this subject. Thank you. S?, car y T' S halts Co pity S ices Mnnager I f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, Cartographer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE PRESERVATION OF THE EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHT- OF-WAYS FOR ALTERNATIVE CIRCULATION CORRIDORS. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council commit to the preservation of the existing railroad righ-of-ways for alternative circulation corridors. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Commuter Rail Subcommittee met and voiced concerns about the possibility of loosing the existing railroad right-of- ways. The Subcommittee is therefore requesting support from ..a.~r nne r(•1ae fns Ma n oao nraN nn nF hhcca n nhf-nF-ura vc The attached resolution will demonstrate City Council's support of maintaining the existing rights-of-ways. R~lly submitDted. // ~~li~C Attachment: Resolution '~erry Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF:IYB:de I~ v RESOLUTION NO. /~ ~ T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PRESERVATION OF THE EXISTING RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR ALTERNATIVE CIRCULATION CORRIDORS WHEREAS, there may be a possibi 1. t}' cf future sale of the existing railroad right-oE-ways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the railroads; and WHEREAS, the General Plan designates bor_h the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe and Southern Pacific lines as transportation corridors; and WHEREAS, the General Plan encourages the further study into the implementation of co~mnuter rail services and development site criteria for multi-model transit stations along these rail facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council is cortunitted to the pursuit of alternative modes of transportation that will provide cleaner and more efficient travel for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is conanitted to the preservation of the railroad right-of-ways as circulation I ~v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REFORT ~ ~cAnr ~ ~~'~ 0 0 ~ $ z U A 1977 DATE: June 21, 1989 TO: Mayor and City COUncil PROM: OOane A. Bakery Adminietrat iye Aeai t / Si1BJECT: Cost for Police Studv Staff has researched eeveral cities that have had police etudiee tlone. Beeed on this survey, staff hnn determined that for a city of our size, a police study could coat from $50,000.00 to $60,000.00. OAe:jle l73