The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989/07/19 - Agenda PacketC~ • - '~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. July 19, 1989 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road tr.a.,..y., r,~,.om,..,oa •r• Clty Councllmemben Dennis L. Stou[, .trays. Pamela J. Wright, cosxiLnrnrNr Deborah N. Brown, Msror Prv-rrm Charles J. Buquet, css,rcirm.me.. William 1. Alexander, cosnrnsumDr. •~• Jnck Lam, tiro .xom~sn James L. Markman, cay .Irbmry Beverly A. Authelet, ciy ckx i City Office: 989-1831 Lion Park: 980-3143 PAGE City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 All itme aubvitted fez the Citp Couvcil Agevds vuct be in writing. TDe deadline for aubvitting Lheae items is 5:00 p.m. on the xedneadsy prior to the veetivg. The city clerk's Offiee raeeivea ell aueh itemv. A• CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flaq. 2. Aoll Call: Baguet _, Alexander _, Stout , Brown , and Wright H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Swearing-in of City Clerk. C. CONMVNI CATIONS FRON THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to addrena the City Couvcil. State law probibita the City Council from sddresaivg avy issue voL previously included on khe Agenda. The City Council uy receive teatiavany and •et the matter fur n auhaequevt meetivg. Comenta ere to be limited to five minule• per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routive evQ von-covtroversiel. They will be acted upov by the Couvcil et one time without discussion. Any item may be revoved by a Councilmevber or member of the audience for diacuasion. 1. Approval of Minutes: June 15, 1989; June 21, 1989. 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nes. 7/5/89, 7/12/09 and 1 Payroll entling 7/6/89 for the total amount of ~ i i $3,356,885,48. i 1. Alcoholic Beverage Apvlioatinn fnr nn Sale General Eating 14 Place Eor Pepper's Mexican Cantina, ,IOeeph M. and Sally A. Mo squads, 9740 19th Street, ~Y':.~Iti V~ PAGE City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 4. Approval to open escrow with Jon and Nary Jane Schrader 16 and Robert P. Novell, Loren and Barbara Fritz, Joae and Nozah Chao and John and Sara Viramontez for purchase of land at 12934, 13104-13184, 1290fi and 13048 ease Line Aoad, respectively, to obtain the right-of-way Eor the Base Line Aoad Widening Project between Etiwanda Avenue and Interstate 15 for $11,500.00, $25,000.00, $12,100.00, and $1,000.00 respect ivaly, plus escrow coats of $5,000.00 to be paid from Syateme Feea Account No. 22- 4637-8730 (FY 89/90). 17 5. Approval to award the Victoria Street Improvement Project, between East Avenue and Et i~~randa High 8.:hoo 1, for the amount of $87,210.40, to De funded from Systems Dave Sopment, Account No, 22-4637-8853 (FY 89/90). 18 fi. Approval to award the Vineyard Avenue at the A.T. 6 B. F. Railroad Crossing Improvement Project between 8th Street and 9th Street to Larsen and Leaveienz, Irtcorporat ed, for tae amount of 556,575.00, to be fundetl with Syetema Development, Account No. 22-4637-0850 (FY 88/89). 23 7. Approval to execute co~traci (CO 89-114) foY the Traffic Signals at the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Haven Avenue, Base Line Road and Valencia street, and Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue Pzo ject awarded to Sierra Pacific Electrical for tae amount of $197,556.00 (5179,605.00 c + y - 12-4657 8852 BB27 and Account No. 12-4637-0826, 12-4637 (FY 88/89) (Awarded June 21, 1969). 24 8. Approval to execute agreement (CO 89-115) for computer data off-site atora9e with Datavault (United States Safe Deposit Company) in the amount cf $3,400.90 to be funded from contract services Account No. 33-4133-6028 (FY 89/90). 25 9. Approval to execute coot recta for computer hardware/software maintenance with Weatek Computer Services (CO 89-116), NBI Incorporated (CO 89-117), Cal Comp (CO 85-118), Tekt ron lx (CO 89-119), Technic Computer Service (CO 89-120), and Prime Computer (CO 89-121) in ~ ~ ~ ~ ...c total s.^ount of $ao~o37,nn to De funde3 from root tart Services Accounts 33-4130-6028 ($63,331.00) and 33-4133- 6028 ($36,606.00)(FY 89/90). i7 ~.r"~,~: ~~~ PAGE City Council Agenda July 19, 1909 10. Approval of a Joint Uee Agreement (CO 89-122) between 2) Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation and reconstruction Of 66 xV power poles along the north aide of Base Line Road from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NU. 89-323 Z8 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TH£ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA~ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF 66 KV POWER POLES ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM MZLL ZXEN AVENUE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE 11. Approval of a Joint Uee Agreement (CO 89-123) between 29 Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation and reconstruction of 66 KV power poles along the north aide of ease Line Road from Haven Avenue to Valencle Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 89-324 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JV1lV A' VJa aVItG GI'1C 111 DLI M1D LD . G CALIFORNIA EOIEON COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF 66 xV POWER POLES ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM NAVEN AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE 12. Approval of Joint Construction Agreement (CO 89-124) with 31 Cucamonga County Water -District for inetallat ion of sanitary sewer line in conjunction with Che City renovation of Eaet Beryl Park and construction of West Beryl Park Improvements. 13. Approval of Joint use Agreement (CO E9-125) with 32 Cucamonga school Dietri ct for city improvement of i i i Cucamonga ELementary School playfielde. i 14. Approval of InstallatLon of Public improvement and 34 Dedication Agreement (CO R9-126) between Charles L. Fu liz and Bernice D. Fultz and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street erontage Improvements located along the southeast corner of Victor la Street and Baet Avenue for the Victoria Street Project - EaeG Avenue to Etlwanda High School. 1 ~`,~~ ~.~ c.rf City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 PAGE 35 RBSOLUT ION NO. 89-325 A ABSOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREBHENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBL.TC I1Q'AOVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM CHARLES L. FULTZ AND BERNICE D. PULTZ, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEPIS TO SIGN SAME 15. Approval of Aeinbursement Agreement (CO 89-127) for 41 undetgtounding of overhead utilities, for Development Review 86-07, located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Eaven Avenue, submitted by Arical Properties, Incorporated - UR 002. 43 RESOLUTION NO. 89-326 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP AANCEN CUCAMONGA, CAI.I FOANIA, APPROVING RBIMBUASEMENT AGREEMENT EXBCUTED ON JUNE R, 19 E9 BY ARICAL PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED FOA VNDERGROUNOING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIEB ON 6TH STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OP HAVEN AVBNUE 44 16. Approval to amend Contract (CO 86-053) for vector Control Services to allow edjustment of time allocation to address current needs of casmun ity. 17. Approval to accept Improvement a, Release of Bonder, and Pile a Notice of Completion for: Tract 13555 located on [he southwest corner of Banvan 5] Street and Mt. Baldv Place Release: Pa Lthful Performance Bond (Street) $133,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 13,300.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-327 58 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~-..~ TION CF THE CITY CCL'NCL O. THE CITY ~ OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POA TRACT 13555 NEST AND AllTNORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WORK Y'` City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 rnce Tract 13562 located on the southwest corner of Rochester 59 Avenue and Vintage Drive Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $165,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 16,500.00 60 RESOLUTION NO. 89-328 A AESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNS CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNZA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13562 WEST AND I AUTHORIZING THS PILING OF A NOTICE OF j COMPLETION FOR THE WOAR I, Tract 13022 Weet located on the northwest corner of 6] I Fairmont Way and Milliken Avenue Release: F3lthful Performance Bond (Street) $420,000.00 Accept: Maintenance CuatanLee Bond (Street) $ 42,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-329 I 62 A AESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT3 FOR TRACT 13022 WEST AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THB WORK '. 18. Approval to accept the Jersey Boulevard Storm ^rain 63 I (Sixth Street Industrial Area, A.D. 82-1), Contract No. 'i 89-024, as complete, release bonds end authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 89-330 6Q A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY i i i i OP kANCHO cuOAMONI:A; Ofl LI FOP NI A; ArngpTING THE ~ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA THE JERSEY BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN (SI%TH STRfiET INDUETRIAL AREA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1), CONTPACT 89-024, AND AUTHORIZING THB FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ~_ City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 PAGE 19. Approval to accept the Etiwanda Area i and II 65 Aehabil it at ion, Contract No. 88-161, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the CLty Enyineez to file a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 89-331 66 A ABSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE BTI WANDA AREA REHABILITATION I AND II, CONTRACT NO. 38-161, AND AVTHORIEING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THB WORK 20. Approval to accept the traffic signals and safety 67 lighting at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 88-166, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. RESOLUTION NO. 89-332 68 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TRAPP IC SIGNALS AND SAPSTY LIGHTING AT THE INTEASBCTION OP ETIWANDA AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVBNUEr CONTRACT wn RR_tFr avn anmwnvrvrwr. mwv vrr rwn nv s NOTI CS OF COMPLETSON FOR THE WORR 21. Approval to accept detachment of Tract No. 12659-1, 69 located on the eouthweeG cornet of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street, and Tract No. 12870, located on the north aide of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Eaet Avenue, from Lendecnpe Maintenance Dletriot No. 1 and to annex Tract Noe. 12659-1 and 12870 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and setting the date of Public Hearing for August 16, 1989. RESOLUTION NO. 89-333 ~~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY i i i i i i OF RANOFO CUV'AMONGAr CAiJ RORNTA, is VING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP THS CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION OF TRACT NOS. 12659-1 AND 12870 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 f (~ ~ ~~ , City Council Agentla July 19, 1989 PAGE RESOLUTION No. E9-334 )4 A AESOL'JTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE OETACHHENT OP TRACT ND$. 12659-1 AND 12870 FROH LANDSCAPB lIAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 1 AND DECLARING ITS INTBNTION TO ORDER THE ANNBAATION OF SAID TRACTS TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANC6 DISTRICT NO. 7i PURSUANT TO THE Z.ANOSCAPING ANC LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPFHAING A TI1~ AND PLACE POA NEARING OEJBCTZONS THERETO 6. CONBBiPP ORDINANCES The following ordinencex Dave had public Deerivgs at tDe tine of first raedivg. eeeond reedivge are sxpectsd to be routine evd vov-coatrovereiel. Thep will be etted upon Dy the Council si one Lila wliDOUL dietussion. The Citp Clark will reed tke title. Ray itq can G rooted for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AHBNDING TITLE 12 OP THE RANCHO CVCAMONGA NUNICI PAL CODE ALI.OWI N6 E%CLUSION OF THE CONST U STREETS ORDINANCE NO. 58-D (eeeond reading) I )7 AN ORDINANCE OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.040(A) TO TXE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODS PERTAINING TO AN EEEMPTION PROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDBWALAS ON CERTAIN ABSIDENTIAL STRBETS 2. CONSIDERATION OP ORD INANCB AUTHORIZING THB LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOA COMMUNITY PACILITIE9 DISTRICT 8E-2 ORDINANCB NO. 397 (second reading) ~8 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALZFORNIAr AUTHORIZING i i i i THE i,P.VV Ok A CPECIAL TAX. IN A COryONImy PACILIT IES DISTRI CP /]t, ~ ~'` ) ~l~ City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 PAGE P. ADVBRTIBBD PUBLIC BEIIRIN03 The following iteNa have been advertised sod/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The chair will open the Nesting to receive public Natiaonp. 1. REFUSE RATB ADJUSTMENT 84 R850LUTION NO. 89-335 8411 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING MAXIMUM AATBS FOR RESIDENTIAL ANO COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTING WITHIN THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA O. PUBLIC 8611RINOS The followiag iteNa havN no legal publ icet ion or posting rsquireNanta. The Chair will open the Neetivg to receive public testlNOnp. 1. PP% OP RM IO OF 1 8 BUI DING OFFICI 139 - An appeal requeeting reco:.eideration of the Building and Safety D iv le ion determination that substandard ceiling height in l ^ _ r_.___o , __ o.-__ ~_ ___-_ ___ -.. _ __. _-___. _..__ makes the apace non-habitable. yAppellante - Jeffrey and eatherine Nichols, 9083 Sunflower, Rancho Cucamonga (City Council to sct as euildivg Board of Appeals). 2. MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-32 - NELSON - An 1M10 appeal of the Planning Commission's decie ion to modify a condition of approval requiring the payment of an in-lieu fee for landscaping wit bin the I-15 Freeway right-of-way along tAe pro]ect frontage of 1.55 acres in the General Industrial Specific Plan, located on the east aide of i i i l Hyeaop Drive, north of Aih Street - APN 229-331-02. i i YJr city Council Agenda July 19, 1989 PAGE ABSOLUTION NO. 89-340 148 A ABSOLUTION OF THB CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPHAL OP TFQS PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO MODIFY A CONDITION OP APPAOVAI. RH(jUIRING PAYMENT OF AN IN-LIHU PEH POR LANDSCAPING WITHIN THB I-19 (OHVORH) PRESNAY RIGAT-0P-WAY, POR TliE DHVELOPMENT OP AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON 1.59 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14), LOCATED ON HYSSOP DRIVH ANO NORTH OP 4TH STAEBT E~ CITY MANAOER'8 STAFF REPORTS Tha fol3oWi¢g ilos do ¢ot legally require any public tastiaw¢y, althougb the Chair up open tba aseting for public i¢put. 3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTIONS TO DENY VAAIANCH 156 89-0_4 AND MINOR DBVBLOPMENT RHVIEW 87-71. COMMERCIAL CARRIERS - A request to gratle and pave approximately 12 acres of lantl and a request to reduce the parking setback trom 25 feet to 8 feet antl the landscape setback from 35 feat to 8 feet in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Indu atrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south aide of Jersey ~ ` - 143 07, 08, 6 09. Continued froe~JUlp •5,-1989 Meeting. RESOLVTION NO. 89-316 164 A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VAAIANCH NO. 89-04 TO AEDUCB THE PARKING SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 8 PEST AND REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO B FEET FOR 12 ACRHS OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD BETWEEN UTICA AND V3NCENT AVENUES IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT /HHAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN i i i SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 209-143-07, O8, 6 09 i PAGE City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 30 ABSOLUTION NO. 89-317 167 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT RHVIBW NO 87-71, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOVLBVARO IN THS NIN IMVM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPBCIPIC PLAN AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 209-143-07, OB & 09 2. PRE O B BAG STA ING PROPOSAL FOR 170 COUNTY-WI D6 B IdI MEAS FOA TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES Coatiavad frw Julp 5, 1989 ~eetia9. RESOLUTION NO. 89-342 181 A A850LUT ION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXPHNOITURE PLAN POR THB PROPOSED EAN eERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPDATAT ION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3. CON9 DERA O O BS AB IS I G AP OP IA DARDS POR 1H2 DEVELOP NT OF C AR VBLIC FACILITIES GROWTH MANAGEMENT REPORT ITEM NUMBER 13 4. N I O P O A SO V O PO ING ~ 196 BALLOT MEASURE IS_EA$ED UPON INFORMATION AND DATA CONTAINED IN THE PARAMED R PLAN ADOPTED BY THE FOOTHI L F PROTECTION DISTRICT i RESOLUTION NU. 89-343 212 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EU PPORTING A BALLOT MEASURE PROPOSING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN TH8 [LANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO FUND A DISTRICT PROVIDED PARAMEDIC PROGRAM I I I I ~ T. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following ite~e have Desa tequeeted Dp the City Council for disouulon. Thsy ere not public hoering iteu, although the Chair uy open the wetiag for public input. f' 7 PAGE City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 11 1. SOLID WASTB/RECYCLING UPDATE - Council Subcommittee for Solid Waeie/Recycling recommends establishing a local environmental qualLty/resource recovery co¢mittee. (oral Report) Continued frw Jul} 5, 1989 westing. 2. CON SO WAL OF FEDERAL 213 CLEAN AIR ACT PROM SCAOMD RHSOLUTION NO. 89-344 214 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING H.R. 2323, CLEAN AIR RESTORATION ACT OF 1989 3. S ON F RESOLUTION ENCOURAGING CALIFORNIA AIR 215 REED V O C U AG MENT PLAN - A resolution of the Ean eetnardlno Associated Governments urging imwediate approval by the Ca1lPotnia Air R96ource6 Board Ot Lhe Eouth Coast ALY Quality Management Districts end Southern California Aeaociat ion of GOVernmente Air Quality Management Plan. RESOLVTION NO. 89-345 216 A R830LUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF ]U1NCH0 CNCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UgGING IMNEDIATS APPROVAL BY TN8 CALIFORNIA AIR MAMAGBMBNT-DISTRI CTSyAND SOVTHSRN .CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AIR QUALITY HANAGEM%NT PLAN 4. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIOM ON LAW Z1J ENFORCEMENT STUDY J. ID IPI TIO 8 -OR NEZT NEETZN6 This is the tLa for Citp Council to ideatifp the iteu they wish to discuss et the next aeeting. Tbew itua will sot 6e discussed at this aeeting, onlp identified for the next i i i westing. Y~(r~~7 V PAGE City Council Agenda July 19, 1989 12 R• COIDIDUICATIONS TROII TH6 PUBLIC This is the Liao and place for the general public to sddre ne the City Council. SGtN law prohibits the Citp Comcil froN addressing any iuua not previously included oa the Agenda. The City Covneil nay reeaivs tastisoay and set the utter for a aubssquant Nesting. CoNNea!• are to be Baited to five minutes per iadividnnl. L. ADJOURNIOQiT MBETINO TO ADJOVRII TO EI6CUTIVB 8888I0N TO DISCVSS PEIPDINO LITIGATION I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 14, 1989, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 9320- i i i i C Baee Line Road. i i ~~ June 15, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Budget Workehon Hinutee A. GLL TO ORDHR A budget workshop meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Thursday, June 15, 1989 in the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 993 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:10 p. m. 6y Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Char Les J. Buquet II, and Mayot Denrtis L. Stout. Also present Were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manages) Jerry Fulwood, Deputy Clty Manager; Eugene Gilmore, Sheriff's Captain; and Russell Maguire, City Engineer. Absent were Councilmembera: Pamela S. Wright 8. WORICBHOP ITEM B1. B BC BSI OF F 8 0 990 1 P OPOB D B S. Jack Gam, City Manager, presented an overview of the General Budget. Mayor Stout expressed ha did not have any pzo6leme with the butlget this year. It was the clearest one he had seen and so easy to follow. Councilman Alexander questioned if the budget could be changed during this two- year period if activity in a particular area should increase. Jack Lam, City Manager, Yeeponded yes. Law Enforcement. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, presented an overview of the Sheriff's Budget. .tack Lam, city Manager, stated that in future yeere there w.ov ld be mere detailed analyses for contract services done. He stated that ae requested by Councilmember Wright, the 1990/91 budget has provided some dollars to begin efforts in joining School Districts for a Drug/Gang program. During the 1989/90 budget, we will begLn diecuaeione about this with the School Districts. City Ccuncll Budget Workshop Minutes June 35, 1989 Page 2 Councilman euquet wanted ue to look at using ROA reeourcea to add Resource Officers far the schools, and felt that staff should look into this. Councilwosan Brown asked why during the recent Domb three[ at Alta Loma Nigh School we did not use doge. Captain Gilmore responded we have an agreement wish Norton Air Force Base for use of their doge, but the local Sheriff doesn't have any. Councilwoman Brown said she wanted to use these doge when there are bomb threats. Councilman Buquet stated it was a rarity when bomb doge were called in, they are only brought in during extreme emergenc tee and extreme problems and it is up to the expertise of the people in charge of the bomb threat whether doge should be called in or not. It ie a resource thei ie available, but we should not put it into the contract. Captain Gilmore et ated they would not call in the doge, the experts would be the ones calling them in. Councilwoman Brown inquired about the SOS that was negotiated by Lauren Wasserman, and asked if the BOS was still Ln effect. Jack Lam, Clty Manager, responded yes. He also stated that we want to keep contract and policy items separate from the budget. The SOS is the standard mutual aid. Mayor Stout expressed we should set aside money to study law enforcement services. He felt this issue should be resolved and should be done by an impartial third parry ae Lo whether we should continue contracting or establish our own police department. He felt that to go ahead with this should be debated 6y the entire Council at another time. Councilman Buquat expressed ii was inappropriate to raise this issue at this time. Councilman Alexander stated if we were going to do a study, we shoo id find out what the costs for the study would De and include it in the budget. Councilwoman Brown concurred that the full Council should make the decision whether to add it to the budges, and to discuss the philosophy behind why we are doing it before it ie put into the budget. Jack Lam, City Manager, eteted we can add this item to the next agenda Eor coneiderat ion and then th Le could be added Go the budget Defote final adoption. ~ M k ~ 1 k City Council Budget Workshop Minutes June 15, 1989 Page 3 caoitnl Improvement Procrem Mayor Stout asked what happened to the phase of the Carnelian Beautification Project where the walla ware to be etuccaed, antl asked that this be included in the budget. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, responded usually you do the stuccoing before planting. They will look at some coating for this project. R R • • • R xayor Stout called a recess at 7:05 p.m. The roasting reconvened at 7:25 p.m. R R R R R R Councilman Baguet requested that in future years we establish a clearer delineation of recreation and maintenance in the City. xe wanted tc be sure we are developing the akille for maintaining these project e, and wanted it clear as to who was working on what projects. Jack Lam, City Manager, responded we do have dedicated people to parka and to other needsr and at times they are cross-trained. We can provide Council with thin information. Auaaell Maguire, City Engineer, stated there is an initial acaign.-iert fo: all personnel which ie described on the organization chart. k f R R• R RDA. Linda Daniels presented an overview of the RDA Budget. Council established the next budget hearing for June 29, 1989 at 6:00 p.m. at which time council would be presented with a number of reeolutlona for approval. Councilman Buquet requested a resolution be drafted for acknowledgement of Elizabeth Stoddard'e effort e. Council concurred. R R R f R C. COMMUNICATIONS PROM TB6 PVBLIC There weze none. . . R « R City Council Budget Norkshop Minutee June 15, 1989 Page 6 D. ADJOORNIeMC The meet Lng adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Approved: Jnne 21, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA City Council MinuteB Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met gn Wednesday, June 21, 1989, Sn the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Haee Line Rgad, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at '1:36 p.rt~. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Cauncilmembere: William J. Alexander, Debotah N. Brown, Charles J, august II (arrived at 9:45 p. m.~, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Jack Lam; Deputy City Manager, Linda D. Daniels; Deputy City Manager, Jetry Fulwood; Deputy City Clerk, Debra J. Adams; Asaietant City Attorney, Andtew Are zyneki; City Treasurer, James C. Front; City Planner, Brad Buller} Deputy City Plannez, Otto Rrout il; Senior Planner, Dan Coleman; Aeeletant Planner, Brett Horner} City Engineer, Rueeell Maguire; Senior Civil Engineer, Shintu Boae; Associate Civil Engineer, Walt st ickney; Building official, Jerry Grant, and community Services Manager, Jce Schultz. x • • x R x B. ANIIOUNCBIIDSMfS/PREBHNTATION6 el. Presentation to Beverly Authelet. City Clerk. wishing har Good luck in the City of Chula Vista. 82. Presentation by Cucamonga County Water District. B3. A presentation was given to Elizabeth Stoddard for the Pinance Department's Achievements. R R• M R R C. COMMUNICATIONB PAOM THB PUBLIC No communications were made. D. CONeNNT CALNNDAR D1. Approval of Warranter Register Noe. 6/7/89 and 6/14/89 and Payroll ending 6/8/89 for the total amount of 52,143,037.71. D2. Approval to authorize the adve~tiaing of the "Notice Inviting Bida" for the Victoria Street Improvements fras Eaet Avenue to Etiwanda High school to be funded from Syeiems Development fu ode - Account No. 22-4637-8853 (FY 88/89 Budget Item). RESOLUTION NO. 89-271 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEHENTB PROM EAST AVENUE TO ETIWANDA HIGH SCHOOL", IN SAID CITY ANO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE 8ID5 D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for Beryl and Lions Park improvements to be funded from Park Development Fu ntl /20- 6532-8006 and the 1988 end 1989 Park Hood Act Fund /29-4532-8610 and 8810. (FY 88/89 Butlget Item). RESOLUTION NO. 89-272 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THB RENOVATION OP BERYL AND LIONS PARKS TO INCLUDE TENNIS MURTS AND OTHER RELATED IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTI SS AND RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval of Memorandums of Understanding with employee groups for Fiscal Year 1989/90. D6. Approval of annual lean transaction between the City of Rancho Cucanonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. D6. Approval to purchase vehicle lifts and adapters from Sefac Lift and Equipment Corporation of Columbia, Maryland, for the amount of $28,365.18 to be funded from Accovnt Number 28-4285-7043. (PY 88/89 Budget Year) U7. Approval to purchase electronic diagnostic engine analyzer form sun Electric Corporal inn of Santa Ana, California, for the amount of $26,677.98 to be fundetl from Account Number 01-4647-7044 and I.O.S. (FY 88/89 Budget Year) D8. Approval to award the Feron Sou Levard Improvement. Project from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue foz the amount of $69,828.60, to be funded from CDBO funds - Account No. 28-4333-8394. (FY 88/89 Budget Year) D9. Approval to award the Traffic Signele and Safety Llght ing Improvement Project at the intersection Base Llne Road and Ramona Avenue (Account No. 12- 4637-8826), Base Ltne ROed end Va lenoia (Account No. 12-4637-8827), and Haven Avenue and Victoria Street (Account No. 12-4637-8832) foc the amount of $179,608.00 to be funded with TDA Art lcle 8 Fund e. City Council Hinut ea June 21, 1989 Page 3 D1o. Approval to award the old Town Park improvement project to Martin J. Jaska, Incorporated, for the amount of $912,252.00 plus 108 contingency to be funded from Park DevelopsenG Fund No. 20-4532-8611 and Community Block Grant Fu nde Account No. 28-4333-8181. (FY 88/89 Budget Year) D11. Approval to award and execute a Professional Service Agreement (CO 89-092) for design services relating to the SeauLiflcation and Aris Study and Nexus Co J.F. Davidson Associates, Incorporated for the amount of 537,000.00 to be funded from Besot ificet ion Funds, Account Number 21-4fi47-8871. (FY 88/89 Budget Year) D12. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (cO 89-093) for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 3298, located on 10010 Almond Street, submitted by Wen-Da Heu and Chang Li- Hua Hau. RESOLVTION NO. 89-273 A AESOLllTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBOR-INATION AGREEMENT PROM WEN-DA HSU AND CNANG LI-NUR HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN SAME D13. Approval of cooperative Agreement (CO 89-054) with Department of Transportation, state of California (cALTRANS) for the Improvements of State Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) located between the Deer Creek Channel and Rochaater Avenue, aubmittetl by CALTRANS. RESOLUTION NO. 89-274 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPSAATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TAANSPOATATIONr STATE OF CALIFORNIA (CALTAANS) POR IHPAOVEMENTS OF STATE ROUTE 66 (FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) D14. Approvai of Improvement Agreement, Improvement security and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for DR 88-25, located on the south sitle of Sharon circle, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Indumar Inve atmenta, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 89-275 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CJUtiCTL OF THE CITT OF RAi:CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVE:.JPMENT REVIEW NO. 88- 25 RESOLVTION NO. 89-276 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATIOH OF CEPTAIN TEARITOP.Y TO LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANO STA88T LIGHTING MAINTENANCS DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 POR DR 88-28 City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page d D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Eor Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road, submitted by Hillside/Sapphire Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 89-277 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALT PoAN IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY OF TRACT NO. 1372E D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 11734, located on tae northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway, submitted by Lewis Homes of Cal ifotnla. NESOLUTION NO. 89-278 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY WUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SBCURITY OP TRACT NO. 11734 D17. Approval of Improvement Agreement Hxteneion for Tract 13715 located on the northeast corner of Jernet Street and Exeter Court, submitted by Walton Construction Company. AE SOLUTION ND. 89-279 A AESOLVTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO EXTENSION AND INPROVBMBNT^SBCURITYVPOR~TRACT 13716V~ D 18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for 6809 Hallman Avenue located on the east aide of F3ellman Avenue, north of 19th Street, submitted by Laslo Vaes. RESOLUTION NO. 89-280 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIFOIW IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6809 NELLMAN AVENUE D19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13644, located on the ~,taeaet _orner of Hermosa Avertue and Vlsta Gtnve tvgirr, au nm,.t tgn ny Woodridge Estates Limited. RESOLUTION NO. E9-281 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREBMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SBCURITY FOR TRACT 13644 City Council Mi notes June 21, 1989 Paqe 6 D20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DA 87-26, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Highway and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Watson Land Company. RESOLUTION NO. 89-2 H2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DR 87-2fi D21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bond e, and file Notice of Completion for: DA 65-06, located on the north aide of Arrow Hishwav betwe¢n Haven Avenue and Center Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 318,190.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 89-283 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPOANIAr ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DA 8$-06 AND AUTNORI2i NG THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POA THE WORR DA 85-31. located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street. Faithful Performance Bond (Storm`Drein) $ 107,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-284 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CZTY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA DR 85-31 ANO AUTHORI2I NG THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract 13058 located on the west aide of Fairmont Wav south of Hid hland Avenue. Release: Pditni'lll VnrfnLmanOR Bnn!{ (Fhre4f) C '1SV,fIflQ ~flfl Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 7$,000.00 P.E SOLUTION NO. 89-285 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO C(iCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEN'f5 FOR TRACT 130$8 ANU AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF C0MPLETION POR TH8 WORK City Council Minutes Tune 21, 1989 Page 6 Tract 0 n Z6 ed o t o s uthweet corner of Canistel Avenue and Deer Canyon Drive. Release (Tract 12650): Paithful Performance Hood (Street) $ 210,000.00 Accept (Tract 12650): Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 21r 000.00 Release (Tract 12650-d): Paithful Performance Bond (Street} $ 360,000.00 Accept (Tract 12650-4): Maintenance Guaranies Bond (Street) $ 36,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 09-286 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, C:S.IFORN IA, ACCEPTING THE PVSLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12650 ANO 12650-4 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THB WORE 022. Approval to accept Improvements and release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for _ 1n_i G'1 ln..e 1_n_T n •Ae annfF aiAP of Paao T.i nP PnPA 11Pt vPPn NP11mgn AVPnnP and Lion Street. Maintenance Guarantee Bond (St reset) $ 16,000.00 023. Approval to accept the Archibald Avenue Widening, from north of Highland Avenue to south of Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 88-162r as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer co Pil¢ a "Notice of Completion". RESOLUTION NO. 89-287 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THfi PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE WIDENING, FROM NORTH OP HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RR-i62, ANO AUTHORIZ7NG THE FILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORR D24. Approval to accept the Hillside Roed Improvements and Storm Drain, from Malachite Avenue to Archibald Avenue, Contract No. E8-092, es complete, release hoods and authorize the City Engineer to Pile a "NOtlce of Completion". City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 89-288 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCRPT ING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA THE HILLSIDE ROAD AND STORM DRAIN, FROM MALACHITE AVENUE TO AACHIBALO AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 88-092, ANO AUTHOAIEING THS FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WORE D25. Approval to accept the Hellman Avenue Storm Dzain, from the southern Pacific Railroad Crossing to Monte Vista Street, Contract No. 88-164, as comp3.ete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notice of Completion". RESOLUTION NO. 89-289 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA THB HELLMAN AVENUE STOiiM DRAIN, PROM THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CROSSING TO MONTE VISTA STREET, CONTRACT NO. 88-164, AND AUTHORIEING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORA MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded Dy Brown io approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (BUquet nbeent ). • w • • w B. CONSENT ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PVBLIC BEARINGS F1. APPEAL OP PLAN IN 98 C 9 O Y I C 8 -0 N MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS. - A request to grade and pave approximately 12 acres of land and a request to reduce the parking setback Erom 25 feet to 8 feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to B feet in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial DietrLCt (9ubarea 9), located on the south aide of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Vincent Avenues - APN 209-163-07, 08, & o~. SLaLC cePucl pr eeeutad by OLW Erw Lil, DepuLV Clly Plduunr. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council were: Lloyd Shockley, Commercial Corriere, stated theLr biggest concern was giving up some of the parking area Ln front of their business and at the rear of the property. city Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page e Mayor Stout asked if the number of trucks which were intended to be at their facility had increased. Mr. Shockley stated no. Councilman Alexander asked if it would be a problem to eliminate only the parking spaces in the front of the building. Mr. Shockley stated it would take away a lot of their parking spaces. Jim Barton, Barton Development, stated he was representing the property owners io the north of the appellant's property. He Eelt that Ccmmerclal Carriers should Dave to comply with City standards like everyone else does, and felt they should have to comply with what the City was asking them to do. Jim Roundtree, Barton Development Partner, felt the variance should be denied. He stated they have polled their tenant e, and they felt Conmercial Carriers should comply with the City's standards. He submitted a petition which the tenants had signed to be included ae part of the record. Fred Beckwi n, Ryder Trucking Company, stated back in 1985 the City required them to do certain things and they had complied with this. He gave history of the various appenle that hove gone through the City, and felt they have always compromised with Rancho Cucamonga. He also submitted a plan to ba included as pert of the record. Dave Wadley, reetdent and tenant of the Buelneea Park, stated the City Council should deny the appeal, because he felt the plan that had been established was a good one. Larry McNiel, 7482 Alte Quests, felt Cheze had been enough compromise and that the City would be losing iE they compromised anymore. He felt the appeal should De denied. Theta being no further public response, Mayor Biout closed the public hearing Councilman Alexander stated he felt that if this was an existing development, the City should not be able to make Commercial Carzlere change things. He also felt thin should be a quality looking development, but he did not agree with the P Lflnning Commiaeion•e decie ion. Councilwoman wri~ht erst ed =he e_«Jrted ^_he olap.^.ing rnmmiesion'e decision. Councilwoman Brown et eted she also agreed with the Planning Commission's decision. Mayor Stout stated he felt the Planning Commies ion was correct and supported them. City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 9 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the appeal. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (DUquet absent). Mr. Arezynski stated a resolution would come back at the nazi meeting confirming tote decision. R f 1 F2. CONSIDERATION OP AMHNDING TITLE 12 OF THE AANCMO CVCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR PRIVATE STREET DESIGNATION AND BXHMPTION PROM STREET DEDICATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIRSliENTS. Staff report presented Dy Walt St ickney, Associate Civil Engineer. Councilwoman Wright asked if a street ie under County juriad ict ion and improvements are made, who would be paying for this. Mr. Lem stated that when there ie a private street and improvements are needed, it is because the residents want the City to make the improvements. Councilwoman Wright asked who's responsibility it ia. Mr. Arczynski stated the City has no liability Lf ii is a private street, and that the City will only take it over after it becomes a public street. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Cou ncii were: _ ..i -fin ..aAi _-.. ed Fn nA 46n n .v.r.e and concurred with ,staff's decision, except` for the neect ion of the Ordinance which stated that the sale price of such abandon and excess right-of-way will be $1 plus all coats of the transfer. He felt this should be removed. Greg Fontana, Bellavieta, stated he would like to keep the street private. Councilman Alexander stated hie concern was for the access of emergency vehicles. Paul Carney, Bellavieta, stated that when they recently had made improvements at hie home, he had to give up approximately 9,000 square feet of land to the Clty in order to be able to make hie improvements. He felt the exemption should ba adopted. Elaine Carney, Bellavieta, felt the amendment should be approved also. Barbara Conrad, 1617 Bellavieta, felt the exemption should be approved. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilwomen Wright asked what the costa were to transfer property. City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 10 Mr. Stickney et ated that $125 and the time to process the documents. Mayor Stout asked if there could be something put in the Ordinance to waive the fees. Mr. Arczyneki read the following to be included ae part of the ordina nca: "Provided, however, that said coats of transfer may be waived by the City Council on a case-by-case bas ie.^ Debra J. Adams, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. SB-C. ORDINANCB NO. SB-C (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.055 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMON¢A MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO AN EXEMPTION FOR PRIVATE STREETS FROM STREET DEDICATION AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to waive full reading and set seconded reading for the July 5th meeting with the changes ae submitted by Andrew Arczyneki, Legal Counsel. Motion carried unanimously a-0-i (su quet absent). _ rnnv awvrunucum rrmv nv oawrnn CUCAHONGA.^ -•,, VARIOVB nAl1END1~NTSn TO VTITLE 16, THE SUEOIVINION ORDINANCE, REGARDING APPEAL PERIODS, APPROVAL PERIODS, AND EXTENSIONS. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Senior Planner. Mr. Coleman stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adam a, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 28-C ORDINANCE NO. 28-C (flr et reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO rurANOwGA, cAL n¢:uN1A, AMRNDiNC, TITLE 16 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA RUNIC IPAL CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to waive full reading and sec second reading for July 5th. Motion carried unanimously d-O-1 (euquet absent). x Mayor Stout called a recess nt 9:06 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p, m. with all members o£ council present (BUquet absent). . . . . . ~ City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 11 F4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESBMENT AND INDUETRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT R9-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. - An amendment to the land use definition of "BUildinq Maintenance Sazvicea" to include small operation contractors which meet certain criteria. Staff report was presented by Brett Horner, Assistant Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 396. ORDINANCE NO. 396 (f irnt reading( AN ORDINANCE OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AHENOING THH INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC -~. ..,,,.. TG INCLUDE SMALL OPERATION BUILDING CONTRACTORS WHICH MEET CERTAIN CRITERIA IN THE LAND USE DHFINITION OF "BUILDS NG MA.INTENANCE BERVIGES^ MOTION: Hovel by Alexanderr secondeL by Brown to waive full reading and set second reading for July 5th. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (BUquet absent). • r, + F5. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THB RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ALLOWING E%CLUSION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALAS ON RESIDENTIAL sTAEETS. staff report presented by Walt St ickney, Associate Civil Engineer. _ _ _ ~~... _ ..s tF~e n.-A:..~..ro •.. he aAA aA n,1 ~n continue the firer `reading until all appropriate language was added to the oca finance. ORDINANCE NO. 58-D (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.040(A) TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TD AN EXEMPTION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALES ON CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL STAEETE MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by HYOWn to continue the fir et reading to July Sih with the intention included in the Ordinance. Motion carried unan imoua Ly 4-0-1 (BUquet absent ). . ~ F6. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARR AND RECREATION IHPROVEMENT DISTRICT 8( SPD 1. F]. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ANO RESOLOTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY O ABBESS N 5 T NTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2. 3. 4 5 6 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 12 F8. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNVAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS- 1 2 3A 3B. 4. 5 6 6 FOA FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. Staff report for the above for Items F6, F7, and P8 were presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. # R 1 f f f Councilman Buquet arrived at 9:65 p.m- • • ~ • • + Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was cloned. Mayor Stout felt there should be a conscious effort to get some of the areas that needed landscape maintenance improvements taken care of. Mr. Fu lwootl at ated staff would do this and report hack to the City Council. Councilwoman Brown stated she waa under the impression that the entry monuments were paid by beautification Eeea. Councilwomen Wright stated she was also under thin impression and that the entire City Council had been led to believe this. Councilwoman Brown et aced she did not feel that Landscape Maintenance District it should be -shared etra fight ^acroee the board', Mayor Stout asked if the 5120,000 could be put on hold for the entry monuments, and to be possibly used for something else. Mr. Fu lwood et ated yea that City Council could direct staff to use those dcllars for capital improvements, but that staff could come back to the City Council before any of the dollars are spent. Mayor Stout asked if the decision could be made at the time staff brings the informal ion back to them, and that the City Council fie not committing these dollars to this projecC. Mr. Fulweod stated they are committing the dollars to be spent, but that Council Wli,l l/t IiT VP Yfl ryI VP ,II YPPt I(~n TP t(1 WhPYP tI1PV WTIIt P(1 YI1P mnnPV Pll P llt. Mr. Arczyneki stated Lost what the Council is really approving is the levy to generate the revenue, that the actual expenditure would not occur until later. Cou rc ilman Buquet etatetl that something he would like to see fie a break down of what the anticipated revenues from the beautification funds would be. He thought that maybe coneidarat ion of a proportionate coat ehar Lng, for the sake of equity, that the eaeeaement die[rict could participate in and that would not be a signif lcete chunk, and yet would still be something that fie equitable, Ne suggested that maybe this item could be brought back. City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 13 RESOLUTION NO. 89-291 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARE AND RECREATION IMPAOVEHBNT DISTRICT ESPD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COl4SUN ITY PARES) RESOLUTION NO. 84-292 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 6 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDECAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 RESOLUTION NO. 89-293 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 30, 4, 5 S 6 POA FISCAL YEAR 1954/90 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 3972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 35r 4, S S 6 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Reeolut ion Nos. 89- 291, 89-242 and 89-293. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. F9. CONSIDERATION TO FOAM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. BB-2. AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX AUTHORIZATION TO FINANCE CE I C TAL FACILITIES AND ESTABLISHING POLICY ON ANNEXATION OP ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT INTO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PORTION OP THE DISTRICT. (COnlinued frov Juna ], 1989 Heating) Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Mr. Fulwood introduced Mr. Warren Diven who ie the Bond Counsel for this project. .._. ., iven :cfcsed to t.`.e Cotrunity Facilities District reF,OtC which woe uanL of the agenda packet. He also noted that there was a change Ln the election date which was noted in Resolution No. 89-262. The corrected date should be June 27th instead of June 13th. Mt. Diven introduced Loretta Sanchez who else presented information on this project. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council wee: City Council Minutee June 21, 1989 Page 14 Jim Fro at, City Treasurer, ei ated that in the recommendation of the staff report, it ie suggest ing that the City Council adopt the policy that all future development within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga be conditioned to annex to the law enforcement portion of the district. He asked iE all new development would be paying its own way for law enforcement services, as opposed to the rest of the City that does not. Mayor Stout responded yes that all new developed areas would be reeponsib le for paying for their own law enforcement. Counc Llwoman Wright asked for further clarification of this, as far as newly developed land in an area belnq responsible for law enforcement eery ices. Hr. Fu lwood at aced that ae this district former there are three tracts of vacant land and that other undeveloped propertiee in this City, ae maps are recortletl, they would be conditioned to be a part of the police community facilit tea district. He stated they will be paying their fare share of the police coats. Councilwoman Wright euggested that possibly the law enforcement portion of this ehou ld be handled in another public hearing. Councilwoman Brown stated she had a problem with raising the taxes in an aaeeeement district by a majority vote of the City Council, and instead thought it should be by a vote of the people. Mr. Lam stated that the issue of additional taxes for law enforcement was not a n~..e~l.: nn Mat Nn vn lvnnA M1aA Mnn nhf , Mayor Stout stated we are going to have to figure out a way to pay for general fund types of services, and felt that the law enforcement issue relating to thin ehou ld be a separate ie eue. He stated that the City Council should go ahead with voting on this, but disease the other matter of law enforcement at another meeting date. RESOLUTION NO. ES-262 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING NECESSITY TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS, SUBMITTING TO THE QVALIFIED VOTERS OF A COMMUNITY PACILIT IES DISTRICT THE PROPOSITION TO INCUR A BONDED INDEBTEDNESS SECURED BY A SPECIAL TAX LE"vi i0 PAY FOR CERSALN v'API TAL FACILITIES iir A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND GIVING NOTICE THEREON, AND ESTAEL ISMING PAOCEOURES AND CONDITIONS FOR CONDUCTSNG AN ELECTION RESOLUTION N0. 89-263 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP MNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA, DECLAAIN6 AND BSTABL ISMING THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, AND AVTNORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OP SPECIAL TA%ES TO THE QVALIFIED ELECTORS City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 15 R8SOLUTION NO. 89-264 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND HOD IFICATIONS TO THE RESOLUTION OP INTENTION AND PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF A COMMUNITY FACTL ITISS OISTRICT RESOLUTION N0. 89-265 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAEING CSRTAIN PRELIMINARY PINDI NGS AND PASSING UPON PAOTBSTS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution Nos. 89- 262, 89-263, 89-264, 89-265. Notion carried unanimously 5-0. x x w F10, ORDERING THE FORMATION OP LANOSCAPfi MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. "/ FOA TENTATIVE TMCT 13556-1 AND -3 LOCATED SOUTH OP 24TH BTREET WFST OF CHERRY AVENUE. Staff report presented by Shinto Boee, Senior Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. _,- .-__-,. _ oo_~on A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORA IN CONNECTION WITH FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT MOTION: Moved by Erown, seconded Dy Alexander to approve Resolution No. 89-290. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. • R ~ 1 • f O. PUBLIC RBARINOS C1, APPEAL OF NOTICE AND ORDER G OF ICI L - DAN EROVS BUILDING - V'/M1µ (`F.NT F.N. - An TppPBI bearing nP.f OYe T.h P. CttV COVnCll, aCt 1nO a9 th2 d08Yd of Appea le, requested by the owner of property located north of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Center Street, requesting that the Notice and order of the Building official for Abatement of a Dangerous Building, at that location, be set ae ids or modif led. (COntieued Eros dose I, 1939 eeeting - Since that dais, LDe building has been abated.) Jerry Grant, Building Of tic ial, stated since the building has been abated, he suggested that it be removed from the egenda. ~ w a ~ o u city Council Minutes June 21, 1989 Page 16 H. CITY NANAOBR'S 6TAPF AHPORTS H1. CONHID RATION OF CONCEPT FO A ER N NCE. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Senior Plarne r. Councilman Alexander stated he wanted to make sure that the recommendations of consultants ate considered in this Ordinance. Councilwoman Wright asked if the Cucamonga county Water District would be involved in this. Hr. Coleman stated yea. Mr. eviler stated that Jamie Foote and George Blanchard have read the report and are in concurrence with it. Councilman Baguet stated he liked the direction they were going with this and felt they ehoultl proceed. ACTION: Proceed with Ordinance preparation. R R R H2. CONSIDERATION OF fiSTAHLISHING PAR% WATCH PROGRAM. - PARRS WATCH is a ci ime prevention program which enl iste the active participation of citizens in cooperation with law enforcement to reduce crime within the City of Rancho .: u.,nm rryu Mr. Lam stated et aft recommends this item be continued to the Ju].y 5th meeting so that the actual program information can be distributed to Che City council for their review prier to their diecuee ion of this item. ACTION: Continue to July 5th meeting. R R R H3. STATUS REPORT ON THE ISSUE OF SIDEWAL% IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OP DON TA A S - YBgdrding improvement of sidewalks on Valle Vista and Alta Cueeta Driven with development of Don Tapia Park. Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Hanager. ..........__ ........... .. :^ht nta Cd _hc fcl he .^ca f he cw_lk ..a v d .. . but^becauee^of the coat, she felt that was a problem. Councilman euquet felt there should be a sidewalk, but that options foe paying for it should be checked out. The City Council asked Mr. Schultz if the staff hee checked into getting a e idewalk grant. Mr. Megulre added this could be invest igated. City Council Minutes June 21, 1985 Page 1] councilman Alexander asked if a "rural look" for a sidewalk could be looked into which might. coat leas. Mr. Lam added that an asphalt sidewalk was a poeeLbility also. Councilman Alexander felt that this be held off until more investigation was don?. No action taken at this time uni it further information can be given to the City Council. H4. PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC GRAPE VINEYAADB. Staff report presented by Joe 5c halt v, Community Services Manager. Mayor Stout stated Lt would be a good itlea to take samples from all of the vireyarde and plant them in a general area ae a landmark. Mr. Schultz stated he would check into this with the Historical Society. ACTION: Staff to continue with the preservation of eigniFicate historical plant material. Councilwoman Brown stated that all the cit iee that have the railway running throu3h them are making a statement about the railroad right-oF-way, and that she would ba taking a copy of this Reaolut ion, if approved, to her next meeting regarding the subject. RESOLUTION NO. 89-294 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PRESERVATION OF THE E%IS TING RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS FOR ALTERNATIVE CZRCULATION CORRIDORS wnmrnN; Move3 by 9ro~mn, ___onde3 by Alex g.^.dgt ^ app--e Rggol__rc.^. Hc. _.-_9d. Motion carried unanimouely n8-O. N6. CONEIDE TION OF U G AN IND P TUD OF AW NFORCEMENT OPTIONS IN FY 1989/90 BUDGET. Staff report presented by Jeck Lam, City Manager. Mayor Stout asked Captain Gilmore if he had a discussion with the Sheriff regarding the study. City Council Hinutee June 21, 1989 Page 18 captain Gilmore stated he has and that the Sheriff has no problem with the stutly being conducted. Mayor Stout stated the intent of this is to have a model of law enforcement on a long term basis. He felt the study needs to be done to determine what law enforcement needs are for the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga. Jim Bookout, 5961 Layton Btreet, felt the $60,000 was a lot of money. He stated that the California Peace Officers Standards and Training Post would do a study for nothing. Mayor Stout stated the City would not be the lead agency on this, because they are not a member of the POST and that the Sheriff ie a member of this organization which might De a conflict. Councilman Buquet fe1C that different avenues needed to be investigated and felt it was a lot of money, and that something could be done without paying this much through POST. Mr. Bookout asked if insurance costa was included in this. Mayoc Stout aeketl Mr. Fu lwood if the city has included this coat. Mr. Fulwood et atad yes. Councilman Baguet stated he liked the poeeibiliiy of using POST, and would like councilwoman Hrown stated she felt the City needed to set standards for what they wanted in terms of law enforcement. She felt the study needed to take place. Councilwoman Wright had no problem with this being included in the budget, Councilman Alexander felt POST should be checked out for their participation, but felt the study should take place. ACTION: To he included in the budget. . • • ~ x ~ 2. rtOeNC [[. MOSlN66S I1. CONSIDERATION OF MENT TO P ING C MA SSION. (Oral Aeport) Councilwoman Wright stated that the caliber cf the applicants was excellent. She further atatetl that the subcommittee was recommending Betsy Weinberger be appointed ae the new Planning Commissioner. MOTION: Moved by SLoui, seconded by Brown to appoint Betsy Weinberger. Motion carried unanimous ly 5-O. City Council Minutes June 21, 1989 page 19 I2. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTNENT TO FILL THE VNEXPIAED TEAM OF CITY CLERK. (Oral Aeport) Mr. Lem stated that with the resignation of Beverly A. Authelet that he is recommending the Deputy City Clerk be appointed to the position of City Clerk. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to appoint Debra J. Adams to the position of Ciiy Clerk. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Z3. DISCUSSION O O CONSB D THE PLANNING PROCESS. (OZal Repott by Chuck EuqueL) Councilman Baguet stated he would request that thin Stem be continued until another meeting, antl that he would bring 11 back when he was ready to present the Lnformation. R R R R R R J. IDBMT F TIO OR I 8 Z MEBTINO Mayor Stout stated ha would like an update on the Morrow iaweuit. Mr. Arczynakl stated he could do this in Executive 8e6eion for a partial update and provide the City Council with a memorandum by the end of the week for the r„ti c~RR..o Mayor Stout stated that was fine and that it did not need to be agandized for the next meeting. R R R R R R R. COIDNNI GTIONS PROM THB PURLIC Addressing the City council was Catherine Bridge, 8715 Banyan, who thanked Councilwoman Wright for bringing up the monument coat situation, She also pointed out that Mayor Stout had made a comment that residents are not aware of what Lheir assessment bills include. She stated that she le an exception to that, and that ie what got her started in government against the County. She also stated she was glad to see Thal Jarry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, was pavinu attention to the aeeesement distri rt a. Ahe Alen added ono fort that s_.„_ people cannot afford to pay Eor sidewalks and hope tha[ something could ^be worked out eo that these people could get Chem. R R R R R R City Council nlnutea June 21, 1989 Page 20 L. ADJOORNlOQlT MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded Dy Buquet to adjourn to Executive Sasaion to discu9e personnel matters and the Edwnrde Cinemn csee. They adjourned tc the Executive Sasaion at 12:00 midnight. The Council reconvened at 12:40 a.m. and directed the Ciiy Attorney to file an appeal regarding the Edwards Cinema case. The meeting adjourned at 12:45 a,m. to the June 29, 1989 meeting to adopt the City's budget. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams Deputy city Clerk Approved: d` o mooPOO~ .moo ~.n wwouoo.~ 0 ov noP~ Noon woo..oNu or z i I I I ..P .. N m PO w~9 !FP OOOUOGnu UOO~ ~YYYlrr~ 3i mmm mmm m..mmmmmmmmmm m.immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm l .~ rl nay .. r- G 0 o in no ao Tw o 0 V i.f ~J w ~~ V .. 2 w V lu » i P PP P P 1 wR ii > ~`.~ Y Yr ~- ~- zo w .>u>~ d LV Wt ~{ ~uVJ Ow YZ rZi00 w< ~Yaym N O o0 o ca ~y u.V6 Y G U U V> J>aL~a 1-Ud?m Ti 3T<>SZGSmw ~•lp1 L.L ~~+¢ U > » > > OY i2mV>SU >m.n wO r~.nY LUOLV~6vOL2 n4 n ti M V O 'LV Ow 2< j " rv M~ Y Vw w ~ ` S Y G Z V O O u 6Z < J S dV V < 2 6 2 ~nUOUZ~-u LLYL ~n2 ,'•n ~ aWp mm OpV ml-I pm uJV{ZO 7OVrYw % Z n Sp< EGa<Z L^~WrM pU O V% LVU uiJ VUU6iw Ia OrYF z r-z« YJwwa iu w .°.o~~z... p~ua .°x ~:i °m'~ii~~ c» ~ w awwum~w„~Jwmuw o.w oN~Ya i i mi Dori<dxo"Srx-w~`i `x Y.... u.-y m~ U U tH a 1-VUHVpI-w Vd 6'4VOww nr~rViw<xWJw Y V 6d yr vl wm «<l«{<l{{rtlm wNm mm~tUOVVV Y dl Nm ~ONP NIV+PPyOPmI~mYm m mY0 y ...a mononrvorymnN OP<m nmmo °mm{ I N .~ .~ n .~ ti .~ n NNnNNN ~~ U U 3 P OOP w.`On rr •~nYOYO~r00 bt]Yr PPU MOOYrri COm.P. ri ~tPmN~w YU0 .[ •~ .~ [i .~ n O a. .r .~ ¢ 2 i .-. n m m 9 N .~ .~ m y N Ci>'• urJh.u PO.Y rOd ZI mmnmmmmmmrmmmn mmmmmr~mmi~r..~m mmmmmmmmmm r^mmr^ u LL tt Y 00~ Gp0 O V J OOV C] - u. J Wu3u ?w w v i.)r.rh l y nM1 _ w p zry `zr ~ ~ ° ° Wu< if¢`n aaus p .. o >cif o r::>w jw ~zNL~- .u=J ~ °m ~~w~ mu y aFZ ~6WJ~n'-, ~"y,; .~ L i 02 ZN Su¢ ~([¢z OOmI:Oa OJJn '204w 6 v. G V UYU~O6NfV Vf¢ r6 YS CCITTV4 2~'S CJ ~ZJ-2io2~uVw¢<FL¢rZ-r2.yiu uwSKw p n....u<U1 ra rf 6r'OV>np> i V~-rya Pn>w6ryOjYUaom>S!r-.ryo¢V<u1F LY OYrv Ct 4< J V N RV ~- ww V N Y ~ ri o0 ur - u> vwi0 Z >rVi UV 6> r~ wV3 ;V ¢ w V w l :.. ...~ 3 SS201w ¢o viMV ¢¢JF,t u,<i `ZZa= rnnpWWN u¢l VrJ6 f1uR~ <2 7yV ¢2~r-i .J _VO <o ¢wir+ww rr O 60< <7=YZrbGwOV ZJ No~~~00ow¢H~il- N L 2„poV=V< ~ ~ wmvOi 6~- Z ~. 6 ZZp iN`f zo uia Nay wwsWn< N zowuwaw ..i .. ju a¢¢ Z VrrN OwF w_p_wl-w ~ Yin<t<YYU~~-r'w<¢ Vn ti MH VNWN2NV<Z VjUNJwV:y9 L'•nJ .J¢< wY2vrV ./ Y¢ L6N3< ^^OO~u JO S r wtR Ur.ri<fVwwUS/r 2i+r~LL U VUUOr2V04fNVrOOppp<-rw wwwrn l-m wiu as U ./lV YI n m.ON Yrn-r NP~n I-n OPnOn mPYmOm Pb`O P^rm POnmMP pNr-r n I NL~OPmmmPrNONmPy NrvaO„LNPwu~Y Jm~nmFNYmOmNNwN COm u. u• YO ~. ~[~OOC^ rvJNV OOVOr o'm OOnnm 000 o`O•+Nm+u•.., mPOrh'naw rvyPO.v Ne.~+.n P PPPPOPC0000 p _ - vP Si '+m mmmmmm r..m r~mmmmmmmn+mmmmNmmmmnir ~nm mmmmnmmm n rt rv. ~.. r~Hr~~y rr r~riu r~~ rti P r V y i n S ~- < r ~~ ~ _ V O COO OV nOCO OLV UO ' JUww~ i..uJUw w w u w„wi0 N ~~ Uu L ~ 6[a CYw ~ wr tin OY6 ^V ~OOP6 - ~ H { wVU O wTOOLw ~O C ~- ' 7 2 wU~ TY<uuwwOwwOwti6K mu=,w 02 tiuU 2 VU O LOU~+ wL< w6 - "'CjVwPVrr YL '~ t Ozrv rVl~tirw ¢OO LL J.•Y K-Oi ~T SrY O ~ r_ ~Z~C ~~~ V G rho Z n /. tt w T. V = V IV - .n ~riio l-LLL = j i+ ZO`U = _ _ O r uY"r j rvV V 1 a _~ KVM1OO<Yw w Vin Rw J ZSLOwis u0 wV¢ HY r V¢Y¢LL o2 r>a2w 3 t~-~-<2 O Lf rvj~wpS <6UrYnwwV7<~{ 6N¢t2JF~0<u6rL ~ ;frv~nr Vt Fn`.~JOwen Y2 VVL¢ U•n2 ¢SwT O~n wwF D~niNYw{ OU¢L .i UY u~w woSVOJw~ uw2VR Z%QO OYNYrw~ O{O=r¢w]l¢Z` 20~+2Y<Vw2 V¢¢v~Y ¢F/<{rV2OO7itirii lY.~~K w~nV{YCyN ~I. VV ZLYKYSS2 •'•rV lYawc yYY ~w0 LC ~ l F.pw~P mi-m O.+yYw~P-.rv dy„rvN.p rvP T~ryPn y~pOPN Y~Or ~' ^Om^ry .~ rvOyY^p Ym•O mOr r~+P NyV T~[•m N O•~•0 ~ .-~ ~ n .LiJY y~rryNrmwyHrym py~m 3~rr N WOrvOONm OGPOO'~ mOmOnOY00vPmG[000 ~+O LL'OOPPOOSm.00N w0'OP OwPON Orin On~nmhO OUZO s POOYOSOpP6 •~ Nu. .. +rn nOU~O +00•J'inrv h C'm rOrwCJP m .• N N n .p q rv ~-~ -~ ~• y rv Ov m ~+ ¢ 1 i n N rv i POrn msN rmPO^ ^qP PPPPPP PYPTPPPO PPPPC Nmu`P PYMP P±YPPPY `P~'JY+.rY U L. ~ L L w rr r. .•rr rr~ R 6K rw R r C¢ p F m U C COO hw O 00 Or 7 G J F~~:uuuw _ :u < W W~.l m~ uz GL.~ V N ~ ~ wSw ON m7 tN W vY(w¢ Z i~ S~ y i to Vf n i ~ 22 O j2\ u viJ V ZUry wVw o iU :V <~Z Kw YOV YwJYNNVY~ JO MwrY2 w iUZ¢~WNrV=uNP rw Zwi6JW 2J O Jr6u O tr ~ i2 ~OV<~Zm< Zw wit Z~ 02w H6r~6 w KOK .miOK Vwwy,R<O v~0¢¢ _ 6N26rOhZOK V nOw YrKYO~~¢oi ).Zi Z •Z.~ZJVNSVOKm~2~ 26Zw waS Y6'~~-rte wOt ~+~•~06 ~-60w •tiL~s V VUZUwV2w lwNwYwLYZO<.i VUY¢r~-+~w V~=6sUVu U U V U > W S N OV 4U r v'1 U' m2 ~N <O ZZw •U Or Jt VFU ¢L f >_L _ LV•~ n¢ r6 '~ V W V. r Z W V n<wV uVZwN ZZW2w 'J Uw ¢ ~¢= r.~G •6U26YV OON OI<-SWOONiUO 2 N.^K' 3 nVS l Y_ ~WrW V~+w d'F w3wN < Y'J<2 Z J P~<00hSOJMJ 2N UVC[V¢ wNrwNV J°¢ wawuzoW~wNd4$~aZ •a »...<wwm~aN O <VFwON OZ 6~N VJ~V aY <=VVPUVY2iOL OQ LL 2Z<N Z~ZWw wLNZNPp oONLUNJ •Sw Lf [w oOK'+mF PV_ <LLOWw< O~ ii• K "1Ym J VUZN<Jrrr aK V wOrrPOLY2VO~VUJYNWUNw < OgriYPUN UYw9p LLrvi2<22JNr>UWgLi2 6C=wKZV a0 ZF6 Z<a<S6N««2<t<1'^i+."3 0000< w zr¢NZizzzpaorops~cYiniPPNNPPPP Pic P~,.P rLN Yi gNNm.r ~IgNOhm ryPYhPSNYghgwPNOqOhOhmh N.pNNmOhO gpmPnmNn nmFgONm mm M.On rgnhON qnl.. PlNOmmO h +OgPgqlmmPh mryN .py ..nN P ym i nnNN N N wn ~r nN .~ n -~ ry N.. -~ OOrvN ..Gin OOmOL~~r ODU.POai NPY2. ~[ YOm~0 .nOOrOOV N00mOaCrpLO .n r^O~~aPrrv-~t~.r~SO J'N.P NrrO r.nm u. O.0hY 01-rnruP ~rNJ)Ym 6 ri^rv ~~u~Pmu~ nP rvu. NP mY~u~~ r O 4~ m n m w N 3 Y r PO•^N POnN SO.vrvmJ dwW is PTPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPUPPPPPmPPPP pCP Ti mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmTm J u -=T 2 P ¢ Y ¢Y~G (c ¢O~ ¢ w r+r+rn ~. u¢ __ YJ i Str Z YSZ 'J2 0000 m~J O L'].. O UU 002 6atw w..tw .u J 706 0000¢. VZ ~Y¢OU OOOOwi O w60o ry 00< NZ •u¢~iUUG 00006 O_U Yt¢<wTSS eyllo>YZ 06n rn mV KS0~4 ' 1-¢w~P tr+w VO6UV~ _ :°on~~m za mm00W2 3L ~Y~'u T. Yf~+ w OZO R 6v~VU~a S O¢O uYr~ .wi.{a w 00'~r+~0 w2Ti L ~ d ~O m3i~ Vur vS~ w2m.~m ~K ~Pl>6Znu CSy~Sii I mr ymruawrnu o~ou v~oi.n j6 plxNY V.~oa[¢VYU<m ~i ¢mYY> i~. <~ O pOn ~ ~n T Z LLS U ~~ opw ~ < wwwwZV i OT ^d O W Ww K t<> K <w~ _ 222U~n~6.n wVV. Y PL<w2 oU ~a ~ ~.. 3 m N7%JWYJJJr2YO<u2¢f <wW O~+ wi <O~Lww<OV JY2 1-SZ V°V¢ wVV~IV V°O 6¢m I-V'0K o iaw omOS~or ..ap< ~ii~z~-xz z2O~N¢<¢ zzz2zzxoUO ~~n> ¢¢w ri w¢¢K¢¢¢ <a«wuox mZwwwwww~r w2~00»»4 n~o<w¢~~NZw«HHOKO wu~¢¢~J <NN xh oooooopoNr ~w wso ,,, N,,,w r..-rw»>.»»>-,u:ii `zrs rv~O n.p.pNNNNrrNml-u~O Y.prFPOOYPmdI-TNarOypP~n ON mim°rp rammmm.~pPN.+ wtOr TinW Nm~p ONrOU~Op r ' Mryrm Pl ~n NwYYrymrv m .~O~uY O<OY.P~OY PIroPry u.• rr m Nry ry m~ ;! <! ;, M~ 0 ~+ J S ZY .v 0 6 i 1~ ~ m~ 0 0 ~ oorm m~a~ ~oo~oa~PO~~a~~oo~oa~~; .. i• a oomm zop oo°ao~nm.mr r.ti uoo o.,.~rv.~r m°e P OOO r ~+.+ m ^u ~ I O OOm n 00 S YI mn wm a' N pdnyP O•+n m'~u~ dPU r.vm Pml•Idd dddLddNd W~'n nn < !1'YY Y.rYlY!•'f'f .Ni+YY llYPViYYV! V 3~ mm mm mm nm rvmmmr~m (nmmm m.n mmn nmmmmnTmmmmmnmmmm J U I S P Pw dP L T rw 2 Y~T9 rr lu rrrr t m ~> Z ¢ "'a ~' ¢a ¢¢¢ irsl W > x d x~ zY nYixz use o Apo 0o Juooci v. ro ~~ °~ `~ Ww ruuyui ~wi L¢ ~Z d d <OY < urwp¢0.W ~JNJ H-LLLV N N LLOr r OZOw¢? <_'JWl2r•Lw w 32LS ~r7 w 6J¢il rim W IYZi0. <l~Or¢ O<r r)<> NuOU ¢ o O O V< VONNi~uOJrK~y< wOaJOwLL OOra =f 02J >C CCNJ¢ rZ2 <T u U U ZU.u¢ udi ~OtwrrfZ~FwO it<~Vr<nRZ w.~ c wHsour uxrra~i iNi~~r~ p<ZO ¢ZwUU¢6<Q2 rZUruhN O p 02R ZJNtw>iu N r..~ ¢r°i wp wu <Ow7>fu > > r¢<a >O¢OJO » YFJFrPY¢¢VM1U~-Ny~r a ~TJ U I y 22 wV' wV 1auJ w O < < Z U Z _ r V WW 2 O O T6~ J6p V .+V IN VNN ~V ¢r N J rw ~ LLZ wuQ n V ~ZN V U r2mym L~^ " LV1 S ¢ 6 ~'¢V ¢Ur Py NW 2<OlM JU O¢ j F t yw i UnOw1..<SC YrI Jr+ Orb •J wi6>VW~rJO N¢Vr62wu¢J2w V U UVV 64` OLL06CJ0 yW~L jl-~l<ww L2{ O N Z 7 2JJw G1JWr\ZLLLWWOrTwY<OV¢mUM Orr U FyVW N WLlooNrLLN oYjmO z • r J< O U<y WmWO m<= LLNNii O 000 W ZZLJZaRa yySQ Uw< yJYO r „ L ~ZL 2ZUZ V> rOr~<KSJLOh OfYZ~ JrLi>Nwl[1•iVVw r w Y ~ R ~¢¢t «<ii<M~<rj<i~OOWim~NVUVVyVVV ~ W YI t~ f mN ~N~1\KlhdmNnPOhhmP1.0TO~POnO pl O n Jm ~\.INr0dnY0l~ 9 n I J r r rvo n nSSNPro mf0 Oy S:S~rv.Q~Pn 7 nOm rOYN fiOOW ONOOm~mOV m~ON~ Pnr~ ryOMNOm^N^7 LOa LPmm GOa~w Nmrv ONW n.pWr u~OP Uwn%.~ Om Om ~rmm 00.p n J~ ~ ^^~ m pPPP00007 COUm~ C.p y.Oy J.~.~la 0y0 U_ mmmmmn mmmm mmmnnmmmmmmmm.nmmmmmmmm T^Ir mmmmm V Z S rte.- ~. rnr~uMrn KK¢rr ~ nrrv~ .-. r~r~n tirv~ S S S ..J ~ ~U00 O. ~0000 O Oo uCG w~ W ~.r ..~JJwW JWtlu W ~WW L Jw W J ZO N WG L VJZ< L 6w O ~ 63L L 0.7 20 SK~r•Y{O. ¢O7L V u0 v.JU7 wOR Z ~tYjWOSrw LLS2~ us C ini<Z ~N ~LJ YSCP~~YNJ^ «SW2 _ ~t~n OL ~< sOJ20 J ZrOr6Y~pN0 2F6 w~-s ~m<~¢n .n w 2Q U~w ~<v~Z ~p m.pOryYwL w0 ~-OV ']lrww rV w00000hOwhVh27<Z6 wSOr~VV wl~Uw _ VOpOnC<}VN242L rLiV UVWULL w nONaZR__7= <w n.p nr~~K\ KGra-W r+ w~¢s d'us ~ t~lQ~Nn v. n>VO<Viw'rLC6w000 z < .. .. •• u 00o N wi` ° a SV 2V~+U Z O V aJrV wwZwV r .~On < u Zj 6r t i J <OZUr VZJ 33327 V'/~NZ< W<' O 3 ~Or6'JK«ZOinsO J 00 O.Ymr ~nw OwZO¢ ZOZVV .<.i u~r.znwr ~l wiWiluu9uaaujwtiwo W Yr~oz~i o i p:~u°i..~~zPa~N za°T3«s <~z.+..ra..ci~ Ni .zr rn u orF„zWnauauuu i~~a<o<s r ... ai:' r Nz uzzzzz uo<mi<roN N°c iNZZz t va u•<uwzrrr~aN oooaa~n owrew w m«<_< -~ rVVf YOCIIIrZiz uZi««<)YZ •6 wmUY0~01Z--' IZ-' J~a~~~~~;,~33~~~~a~3~3~3~Aa:oo~N~aoo<ooWWW N ;~ PnmmulPmNNNn.pOm N NNNr nmJP N~/rONNrpmpNmmm yv.-ir f~I r.ywrlf Pmf Vmr iNi<~• ..O NNmwF001•p NNNN r NN •pryrm<r.prywJ ry PNHymmlN «hTN ~ n NN.1 r (~ r ti0000rO0iq Urv000 n~-OC O.~OmUO+000mmOPOUOn.'-'ry OOOONNry OOmN000POmOmOdOOnNOOPlOPO~Oa~ O! m m '~FOm N~-ON hOmryin NONY w0~"Nm POD ,y .~ m rv n mN.~ n.n~P rv~. ~,~ ¢ =i f u mn O SI v~N.mi .N+r O^hm'a NNNrvP Om mm ~~MmmPVlN •.fJ J'a r~.-~Nm NN Y ~p JYN N.i±Jd'O SOS .p .ow0 LYw OL OL Yd 3~ mmmmmmmmmnmmrlmmmmmmmm.nmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmm V V W s z a` V .. N .. ~ <R 6 w S in O 2 S z > J U ]_ ~ p ZpO .n 43 ~VwY ~w ,y .~ u _ Y O V w< Q O f f4 < Y ~„ 3 ~~~ ~n0 fON' ..] 7J OVw^ LL SWO w.OVO O wV a=¢w ¢Z p~wYVU<20V ¢KZ w6 Eo¢ R=6NVUw~-Z ~ZUt~/~ ~Op2GNOJZ=VOVU wi 3u00<tN2VVa]w <UxFawNi joti LL<til_UVf ~w ¢S ~w¢ ~ ~VUwI WZJZO fwV r_ZLf ~< w< rti<sU « u~~Q<wN 2i~w wh¢w Ur_¢WU+,w SLJ w'N V3VV= nOw QJ ZV V VV'>r~V V)<JOwtiti~LLHC~+Jw6 OjOwLwJ 1u lu OS<wfJ Of w¢<wJ N6wz J~¢KI-~CNV ~pLR>¢Niuu'¢~VNYSi6¢UN~. xOw¢iS6G O N ^ Z I w V rr y ~ N ~3 S - V r. 7 O u RUN >FY U OGVyN N 2J riZa uL UZ Nr+ FtiR W~2 HwWOS7N<_ IUF U2RS0 OLIW[ wF6 ~1wNUr O>r2~ OwN¢ ¢ 20~K `~O<¢Fw Zw0<~n O~+~jN-O TOCwR'{1WW'Jw Nw~ iLit JLaZ ~nQw Z¢JNL¢ 60VU2 <uwSV xOWY O<R JOt{ u HZw¢VWR ¢ _{w_OZrOirvr<_R_xM _SV •x VAC>N o OU wWNwW<J><LLYF_ pNJVOiti fO7 R N <wNVtiNL~NVWOwWYIY fO7RW VHwiYOwZUH2><wWYw LR~f iyk xiN<pVVWQ OOVfY m ,.u~W w<uW wlx-w.wxal.<zo¢¢rcxr oz«sws aox .x. s~.z. .c. s wrw>u<uuuuuu cux~YxRiszNti .....+ u N s tl ~OY<FPrNOrym NIP yN.~•PTr NNMNONOhwlHNI~IYON+N.pN 11 O~N.~N NI .O .yNOOO l~Nm <TrNWN Nalw ryhlNaON H r ~ •.nNm.yN NwnTNwryOrvNVF.<i.~+.liNNwY N! .N N ~i N ti~ N ~-ommN oomn~.P000roouooov.J OnoooNOOOm _ rvou :1 OO °o~oor-•mp+•n P.ooc~-.r o.o mooLOO.v r~°o .~ oo~.. ~. -uw ~.ooooomnm O Op~ nOm m..rv~GOn .r a a0 nOF ~Om unN rvNN m m r N 'I P n ~L POn rvm.r inw nan-wPO-•n NON a J•Oa •R I-hn mP?PPPPP [ aJ.O a~NJ•Oa T 1 mmmmmm mmmmm~~mmi•im mm mtlmr~mmmmmmmm mm m~'Imm.nmmmm U y ii ~i r .~ n w n rr .+ r r r• r. m ¢ J O U00~-~- La¢ O 000 l0 O 22u]O 2 JJ . u W ..~ ,., ~~ u - ,.~ _ s z L ..z _ -uu~ ii woR iNw ~~ii - :ii VOLE .~> 6UU •~ ~ooo ~o uoc~`iu ouaiN vi.<. imz ~ ~ wa •~. »>u.< »wwi ire<"z >w owK} w{r~N •oic« uKm a>r a'd' io.L.••LUpKWON wJTa z~u u~w.•w oN UO J000 <R~>20JOVL O UUOYZO~f r~0 RNrn rr w ¢ Jti6 ~SN> wti¢<I-~ w~um x,p wl ZLrsw fU r«fVYUKOKtw<F <~i<rwu2i<i-rV >~rUiR0 [~}Or2 U6L¢~w ~F~TKe~ZJO~VKKUl2 v.KLKCm0 ~V~wLUVV~>~uw<V}u KVw~>O 6j6V¢i.. mew .. oz~»wow~i Kii ~wo~w.-~~ ~n-soJica~o« rcas u..><LKUKLwisW°uuwzisuuNK<i2 i u ~ .. }V 2 U O 2 6 2 JmOw w OY ~ Ow is <r 4Un-vGiaL 6ZN LO r C w~ U j •Q .n: wfyM1 ON•>iW 4LL6i{O<i<~KVLZ Z< O 0212 4iF¢ <2J <~wULY .,L~JYK W ~ m., U W:wi LrNO?ONZ V}<f pIW 2wYLK wa ~i~ -uLJyuwWiwu~wJ r<aa wr< <J }<wo wiK a .~uN asu~°u ..eiiW:SN .z.KY wJ<~~YYJJ J:I oa Wwzz :NJZa L <w Kw xi ''< N JW..K n.ra J.. .. z zz ouw J LN •VSX JJOU Knew W~+J O~(Y YMW3USSfi`0 tRNY I"ILWKO}OJZ•-• >YSZ JhNiVU ISUiY<N 6 rZV<Z •-•OY ZLK«K<7{=jJWWI+<•"17 <W <~'^26 Vrlw< n• LO i wYYy<YaJ'-a l0 OCJN>JSZZrLLNw~Z>S IiHCia P }I {I NNP N.pO On~<NYNJ~mPNypO<-COI-nP0<n~N.p OIP Nr•~i tin 41 ±in:N9n inN N.a hi YmNa J•+•3 NN i01•I .YiM ^ NiN tinN OO+f PN m<yNn1 'f Nm <„nrySyy<I-<A I r+~rymwyN NNN N N ••I N N NN IN~ OOOOn)m 00^pn+UO.+O.+P Op.+Nm+O 0000 u~POPO h[)m .pm+VOnO+PON.pm OOOOmwO oONOwNn ^, Pin P.n nN^ -.mN nO~m , +. NP•'~m PO^ ^mw ryP m .r pa ~.~ n n 6~ n r 21 mP O•~Irvm mpO^~~m+r POn PO~00000000 ^.~n~n •'~ 31 I.lmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mm mMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 1 ~n _ _n n wa Z tir •+ n r I.n ww nnn a n~ a z aa¢ Fin N 2 F ~-U FnO 00 eJ 'JG OS ON OOZ ~[ P000 . .. ~ ^ rvV W ,.lu „V V Z • h~ ~, t < n H O~ i ~`ai uecziraOUm<w<1=Mi~Win ~"ajo ,-u ~ oppzNi a~nu< a z.„'' n~<~<.n WNUz "'-,,. '~~`,~xa z°az wii ..a a'Ld~aua NoiC y~rJ ~L%r Fy,.lz wn><~nVw wyuwJ ° •.e J°n~o~.-,.~< .n.xw«nPpu°w o•J.o °o~WO~i° ~soiiN'~'L.. wi'i~putN3iuaazJ p-.u rms ,i .,,¢ V _ u?r JL oV V L i~ yx a G WY a F N N~ r N_ Z3 y ^ ¢2z < G prr `-USUJ ZwJ6 OAK > OM wa NH ?yJJ 20aw2 :N I",Y ¢OFr m _OVWpu O~rnF N <mmy2V0002 O aJ 5ww6WW '¢ na •2 V< FZQwF<aa mJNUyUN Lt .+Y YO¢N O J J•+I+ p L<wNL000¢~¢Z2 W<w~-IZN JJ J ~-at<I+ an SV 060t~+1"16 J ¢1[Y izwz WJw W .- zrJaz a o ~uN.n <JwwWz w..„oz r ..~,-~ omrJ <m szp> ¢¢a..wmm mr J ~umnFi~isl`.~ux x:uuuuN~rio~vxrz. ~4i'Jinrz-oFwwr>r a P x i<w <..e JZ3 ««<w..e ~¢ <~s<<w...>. .>.ii~iiio ><z zzayzoeoaaaaaaaaa ~a¢a¢~¢au¢s¢¢s.PaNNNp N ii NNOY N'hNnnN•yP NhV.,NNaNNOOn1•~PIN .INaapioFa•'I• ii on..omN O~-.. ..a nr ao a-.rr<amaN a..~oNe.a e n I NN+y NNNnn +~~wamara ^ +NN a NNNry f IN NNN NNNN ooNOOOpY,,.o~-NO~oN+hryoooooopoopono oi-oomcnW ooomohooNryol-h m:mooooo,o oooorvuuooronrv. o - oorvoW ,.~v,~ ~-uo~o rym mY Y.p p. yN mm.pryP tlFm Ynn Ppy TPA PO~+rv u.p ,-n.p O.. uWao<mW< ii mmmmm,., mmmmmmmmm mmmmm,.,mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm W ~ isi zxzx x ~~pooa o 0 u wWUW ~ W i io°o r ~Jm n wPryr 5 mp ¢(~MmOmO Z,nuuu K¢ Uw ~i NOO JNUUU ~+OMT J<um « nZZJO <ir2i ~o~ ~-oa.:,o eaz ra iu u,iNNUwvu~w N,N., z~om ur Wu JSUU °c .°.....~ °iF=s,'~ .. ¢Vwu~HpNUOO¢ 5r.-n p~i~Y= ¢ ~.ii-iWi ¢zzi¢Jm~ zz qw w5 ., z ,~i. 7+~u7JjuWw7 .Tiu SLLJJ¢ZrUiu,¢Yt[¢t~3 w n mn m2 u JUwi LVQyVLLr u. I m¢6..¢6¢¢V¢¢NVv~Nf, w~O tl,pLL l¢5¢¢Z6u.U ¢,SnU ¢m¢KShRU. U O N UV Z __4 < r, qO Oqj f OOgON 3 ww ww O V «{«wU V ~ 2 _ _ t Y 55525_L p a O¢ wr DOgLLOq ~N ¢W <UF OQr J%J,-,4 wuOJ,y H~nNryl 7w_ C_W¢02< 1-~OJ •qwt uKOF __Lw NOU<JJJ J Yfw wpW,~yY O =J0¢ ua Ou Vni< <~<th Sv~YN J'l 2 wiY NU~¢ tNVUyVVV raw<W<NYw X22 `J` ~+h<W ~-<5 ~' itu Nw <O N~.nu T r YNO tI-Y OOC 2wHj¢ ¢ w T2 N! NWQ 66¢6~~LLU~<.,N NFh<2i0pSZiJV~ V T'ZUwZV U WwwWWW{ ~N¢VW<WNN <wJW <SLL pOOZShhYphrV2W¢LVn1'JYWVZNZ<YM„FV ¢gK<62VUY2JLV<O » iw<LY S~+jwWYJYTiL<w i mair~y..ar<~i~i~~°~~q. `~'N H~NN~<5 qp°cuiri°r ~r~~iaii PTNN.~^hmNPONYhYOryNNN O~OVPOwVYiY NrmmtiO NP YNti Y imr h'm N.-~~NmmmNrlrNNNYrYM1NrNY :NN V srvyNNVVmNNVrgNmmNti~l~h<NNNry~NNPryVm VmS YOSV -nN ~NNr~ N NtiN NNmwN /~ oo~n oo~na roaomo m.°ow °onm r .moo ~rcm.i e.o r:n m.~o= m nr ..r in .pr mPO.+ KI S n I-n •lYY 'YYY"~`C 'CM V 3 i mmm mm~n n~mmmmmmrn O V Y Z 1 Z rr V p = O r 2 O L 2 Z >.I a2 ¢O~p _ _ LOi<irv .`j62 VUU2~n tU'Jw LI VOpw r+p ¢O .ox. v+oon` o~iow ~0>~~~2°uwr~:ixx Srv.iwuuu y- ~+6•-Z I UY~C~m~VaSKLNa~ V Z i ~ Z <W ` riiwN~wau i ~„`, ~z.. ~xoxJrc x a ~c~weirY m.`.S u..a zaw o ~ wai'~':li~w~zozr z z.. ziia2O~s°W ra°rsisr~rigoF~. ~ zwNNl. oo ~..a P `."'. ~"i •o~wu/saooso »y3~V~nlZ3~jlx0 N a i rrPPSr .prr mu~p ~Ifrv I rvrvrvrv ~ ~~ JUN 30MA9, + ~ luwlcltltatl tw ulattouc ~ totwl)1 I. Iirgsl a ualutLS) IA] rlo. r. o r d A4W0 r r • ..1s• CowIN tbe~.~ w~ur. +nlt obt ~snmo ~"«W'~" TF Gt G G I d a sus caou. bltnltc Harr w. ae]eax 0000 I61S t al r Ollt a 1 tI00r I•r Paar1•«Htll w Axlw~ Ow Ird ]. MAMgbI a APII1CANryq Tr.p. Iwti ~0 Wes. Jo~N M. AMN r.Mr Lc ]OI• ~ !0•wto Ora I•wunw [bdw OtM MOpOW. ]•111 A. } iiIM1 G/ ItANSAC1101A51 f@ GC. 1vR III[ SY! ] t]SJ AJ O GT ]0 l Ilta• a OuWita Pt r'• Md/un Got1•• ]. la«Ym d OWnr-M«Yw aJ SOwt 9>1p 19tA bt. alI val Ot Ced• Irdb Rv1~11A t ~~ivutA/ao TOiAI 1 1350.00 ~ Slls~ t>p/~l lifwlt• 1]-]1]101 1. M>Lhwr. InYi Y 4 .OSYry AGM. fii GIRaaG Eau SI-NlwOpr and Ilrod rt...r rr..r 0. Ibw for tra h•on <arnidM d • liryl Y rr 10. II•to fa' ow .iehhG orry d M IroHtlory N M Akata4t Mu.q• Caved M r ttll'ltGa\ d Gw 0•Iau'Inn pw• I I. t.pdn a ">W' «tw h Ntw v w 10 « « wudl.«r NG4 ANI M dwtltG par d G`t egtto•«. 11. AlMbal TwA Id IMr srT ^+^w•f a7ltttG h w~td• Y««1 aan« N! •w d IM welittNiOa d a Ik«.... wd Rl Nv N MO ml rel•I• a wtaM V Ntl•h1 d Gw p.Mi«w N M AIuAeIt On•la« C«nel M 1], STALE 0/ CAlI/00MA Cowry M ..._____..__._..._Ow.__ 6/]0/OY_.______._... ~ ..rr G ..n... r ..~ .r. rr tr., ,.+r ..I w . w ..rr .~ ~ x...r.~...., ....,.. .....r. ww..ti .r.. +. r ~.~ x. i... Yt wM4w'w ti M. A• ~.«. •~/ ~ r ~ ~~ y w i\ t +~ ~r .w. n.n x..w~.w ..._.e _....... .. .. ...~....~r~~ :.ter ~.r r~ r .: w~.y .-. . ~_ ;~•~ ...., .. rn ~+P.~ ar ~ •YL Y ~Rna ~Yw{ \ Y A ~w_. -~=•'~. ~.~.Iw ~ h4 ~ J n.grw~ a A\n/ Y nw~ ~ u«w A ~~, III ti ti.~Nr ~~ .r Y tr w~L y wM n ~.. uw ..n. 1'.KYr n Y.~~+ 1•. AIRICAM ) . SIGN H!R ...a__LJ__ ~Lr'r'.~~rc~ pl AAIItAr10M 1T T~INfIltO! Ib. STAY d CALI/OIIHIA Caary N ..W.J6r]SOSp .Ow. .. .q4]/d`A « ~ u .~~i r..rlair.•rlr ~.~ ,mod. rrr , in ~i.~ r ~ r.~ a,~~ IA tlenNll N Lkoawlt) 1), firwrdll N Gtnwdll It. Ik«u Numbtrlll es•rw:.a J• • ~~ 'RLMI alA b • ~ IP, Lxeten Nwn1a aal11rw1 Clry old Dp Cody Cwm1 f3YU Uth 't Do Na wrW bloc TAY [litt; Fw Mprl•I•w Vw QJ] An«h•i ~ twaGN aGw, o~~ ~ ^ ..............--___.._._...---- _... _.___colln wueo --'--9Gtalav.............--'------------ «... Q ttw.N~Iw d_______...Jo4 w........._ .... ............ 001a «_.________.__....]ttMpr llA .... _................. ~I n_I ~~ r, v n~ners ~N a,Nrru ~'ao~ o~+~a.. a r~°""c~ea-oo ~°'~ N zaurw a ieNo~ne aa+Kb ~« rowm M.auR+uan awa.rnw wa4 arsinc 9gAh M~dkm R~NOmtW 4-K OV8/IG rs~ M.aun+uan Rwa.mw wea ovsi~o wMe ana APN 20Q-t11-Qp By: E MCntlt 7.7.89 L_J ~ '-1 i a . - /~ --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF FEPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer ~> SUBJECT: Base Ltne Road widening, Phase I between Etiwanda Avenue and Interstate 15 - Right-of-May Acquisition for Jon and Mary Jane Schrader and Robert P. Novell, Loren and Barbara Fritz, Jose and Norah Chao and John and Sara VTramontez properties at 12934, 13104- 13184, 12906 and 13048 Base Line Road Recommend approval to open escrow with Jon and Mary Jane Schrader and Robert P. Novell, Loren and Barbara Fritz, Jose and Norah Chao and John and Sara Viramontez for purchase of land at 12934, 13104-13184, 12906 and 13048 Base Line Road, respectively to obtain the right-of-way for the Base Line Road widening Pro,lect between Etiwanda Avenue and Interstate 15 for f11 ,500.00, (25,000.00, f12,100,00, and (1,000.00 respectively plus escrow costs of 55,000.00 to be pa td frog Systems Fees Account No. 22-4637-8730 (FY 89/90) and authorize the City Engineer to execute escrow documents on behalf at he City. BACKf4g111O/ANALYSIS: .~ ,__ -. W 1- GnM r.Aw ,,.~ o~tie.~ a TIIe u~yi uen iuy vcii-ii +id ff mct 'd'.,. ~~n d,,.. Novell, Loren and ~arbara Fritz, Jose and Norahr~Chao and John and Sara Viramon tez to discuss the forthcoming City protect to widen Base Line Road between Etiwanda Avenue and Interstate 15. It was mutually agreed that the City would purchase their property (land and improvements) for a purchase price based on an appraisal prepared by an independent appraisal consultant. The mutually acceptable result is the above recommendation plus the City absorbing normal closing costs. Since the City Engineer, by Resolution, is authorized to accept the dedication on behalf of the City, permission is sought hereby to also allow the City Engtneer to acute and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City. ReVp~Zful ~ ~d, ~L i ~ ~~, ~ Attachment / - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector /'i SUBJECT: Award the Victoria Street Improvement Project between East Avenue and Etiwanda High School for the amount of 587,210.40, to be funded from Systems Development, Account No. 22-4637-8893 (FY 89/90) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept ail bids as submitted and award the contract for Victoria Street improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Larsen and Leaverena, Inc., for the amount of 587,210.40. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on July 10, 1989, for the subject project. Larsen and Leaverenz, Inc., is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of 587,210.40 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 3102,817.20. Staff has rov(ovad all hide ro~eivsd snd fnunA •haw M hn r,xw,\aha anA in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background 9nvestigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp lp submitted, ~ ~~ RHM: :s Attachment cc: Purchasing n,mv nc n ~.n nn n STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Award the Vineyard Avenue at the A. T, d S. f. Railroad Crossing ~ Improvement Project between 8th Street and 9th Street to Larsen ~ and Leaverenz, Incorporated, for the amount of f56,575.00, to be funded with Systems Development Account No. 22-4637-8850 (FY 88/89) RfCON1EIDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Vineyard Avenue at the A. T. 8 5. F. Railroad Crossing Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Larsen and Leaverenz, Incorporated, for the amount of (56,575.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS June 30, to 1989ounfor acthen~subjecterprojecti~d~ LarsenVedandd Leaverenz iuwt L~uraixJ io Lirc dyydidi,t ~Gecit r2ipc:iiblc biCdcr ::fth ".id ..^^"^.• ^f f56,575.00 (see attached bid summary). The Englneer'sy estimate was 550,130.50. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and 1n accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp y su ltted, e .. ~7G RHI ' Attachment u: Purchasing g WO i ¢~ y6 O T y~ O H U W N P 0 P O C Z f ~ ~ V H N 0 Y y ~p G Q 0 C6 Y L 8 P yN iK U W a `a 4 M H d Z yt W> S f W ~ a " ~ ~ S a~ O 8 ti T A Ci a ~i M O ~I /~ A 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8 ~ ~ p N P N N N ~ ~ 0 g N QQ,~ ~i _ ~ p O p O p O p O p O p G p O p O .-~ ` 0 J ~ N m i N N ~ C N m 0 1 O N p G p O p O s p O p O p O p G p O p O O p p III ti ~ C N ~ Q O ~ ti 0 3 .. F ~ O N H p O S S p O S ~ S S ~ x m - J ~ T ~ ~ _ .. N s .. ~ s s s s s s ~ s a s 2 ~ ` ^ 8 N ~ ~ yp ~ N ~O 1` P 1 J K • a p O p O p O O C Q N p O p O 8 ~ 3 m ~ ~ ~ St .. C1 Ni 0 P+ .. 0 R 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 °~ ~ N ~ ~ g 8 ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ T y8~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 T ~ O J N ~ N R ti ti N p 1+1 H Y m p O p O p O p O 8 8 Si a 8 S Tz. ~ ~ ~QQ( x ~ ~ 0 N ~ X 1 . p N N N ~ TI f S m N ~ e u°~ a ~ N Q 8 8 H Q M Q ul N a S N H C S W ~ 0 J y N m b 0 P r1 p N 0 yi E Q N Y y~ W_ pC O C~j W ' - C e J J J V V T J J 2 K +~ O J ~ p G ry + N q V YI • T N m Y1 O N Y yL M E ~ E ~ { y< S y H pp G ~~G y Y Cp NS ~ Ur Ye tJV O U ~ L U ~ Uep tJ 1~1 f < y O Y ~ 4 i 4 ~ ~+ q J r M S IG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S N ~ ~ ~ ~ Y yJ ~ yJ ` y ` `Y y r `~G y ` y `y t W ~ ~ • M N p 1 jT yC ~ yG ~ C T C ~ ~ C G C d U `.A j f~0 q ~ p a N OC py p ~ pp ~ p y Y p C 1 S i UY U C U i U i UKO YO ~ N T ~ N W n (O N O n V 8 8 8 88 8 S 8 m $ g ~ ~ S ~ ~ 8 8 S 8 R m 0 J ~ N J m ~ 8 8 88 8 8 8 ~ ~ N ~ N f m N ~ ti .y ~ .f t ~ p 8 yy O m o J , N m JJ O Y O p p Y I p G y p O p O O ~ 2 { y T p N ~ m y P n ~ N .y N C ~ ~ y Q p o . O ~ ~ H o o ~ yy ~~ t hi . J • p O y J ~ J tll m O y G p O p O p O p O O O S W ~ ~ ~jQ j ~ ~ p Qa ~ m y N N N LL C ` p J 8 y S 8 N 8 • o j Yf m J p N y ~ ^ 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 G ^ s m p 8 0 h ~ ~ N { N ~ p N ITI m O N v 5 ;r g gi 8 8 ,~ R 8 8 { p ~ N C 2 1 ti J "'~ N b J I ~ W m y Z L Y U N Kp O .~i LL LL e LL l~. 2 E t .Vppl N X'I1~ J J TLt ~ N ~ J NN ~ N J 6 ONS 8Y p ~ ^ i~ ~Y sQY doso :~~ 8~ .X .s$~x WEa; f: ~ '~`XX; ~~g.Yi tee" '~ is NoJa1t ~~t%g g ~ ~ ~~~ u~~S KN6 Ut 1LL! I~'tNSs' RiG• .y .Na .~-~ N .~.1 H w I s s s ~ o mP P N p N ti ~ O p ~ J J p M '~ O O N C ~ p Z ~ + m y r 0 J J O p p r o o m Q Q 1~. n N p ~ w ` 7 t O K p j 1~1 ~ OI J J 2 ~ S ~ I A ~ ~ y ~ W O f W ~ _ u i N N W p ~ Q J p N p p O O 8 m W N p N O 8 5t C {p N N N F i W m J J Z W p y ~ ` W f O V K O h ~ N N ~ e J J t LL O N N g N ~°i u° ` ya r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~a..~ ei ar i i e . u > . • r e o~. a s r m ae 'ur } NLL M C !. .N~Y ~O Ny r W ~ NN y ~LN^ C N ` w i Y eY LL ~Y ~~ j< Y K 0 P =J s - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ? STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. long, Sr, Public Norks InsPector~6 SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signals at the Intersection of Victoria Avenue and Haven Avenue, Base Line Road and Valencia Street and Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue Pro,)ect awarded to Sierra Pacific Electrical for the amount of 1197,566,00 (5179,605,00 plus 103 contin ency) to be funded from SB 325 TDA Account No.12-4637-8826, 12-4637-8827, 12-4637-8852 - FY 88/89 (Awarded June 21, 1989) RECOMMEIDATION: It 1s recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signals at the Intersection of Victoria Avenue and Naven Avenue, Base Line Road and Valencia Street and Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue Improvement Project, and authorize the Amninistrative Services Dl rector to expend (197,566.00, (j179,605,00 plus 103 contingency) to be funded from SB 325 TDA Account No. 12-4637-8826, 12-4637-8827 and 12-4637-8852, BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, City Council awarded the sub3ect pro,{ect to Sierra Pacific Electrical. Staff has received the executed contract documents, bonds and Insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Resp 11 su fitted, ~~ cc: Purchasing ~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CI:CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 TO: Mayor, Members o£ City Council G City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT FOR COMPUTER DATA OFF-SITE STORAGE WITH DATAVAULT (UNITED STATES SAFE DEPOSIT CO.1 IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,400.90 T'0 BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT NO. 33-4133- 6028 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the execution of the contract for off-site storage for backup data associated with the City's mini and personal computer systems with Datavault United States Safe Deposit Company in the amount of $3,400.90. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Datavault is a firm that specializes in providing backup and retention services for media storage. This will ensure adAcA nrnf ar+inn anrinc+ +haf+. fire an.i n+hcr dicac+erc +h a+ could destroy valuable data. Re pectf idly sub}r/m it~t d,~ o il'!~^h/~f'~ erry B. Fulwood eputy City Manager JBF:de Attachments CJ - CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: Mayor, Members cE City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood; Deputy City Manager ''', SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE WITH WESTEX COMPUTER SERVICES, NHI INC., Clw COhT, TEXTRON IX, TECFRIIC COMPUTER SERVICE, PRIME COMPUTER AND AC3 COMPUTING PRODUCTS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $99,937 TO BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNTS 33-4130-6028 1$63,331) AND 33- 4133-6028 ($36,6061 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. RECCNAIENDATLON: Staff recommends City Council's approval to execute contracts for computer hardwae a/software maintenance with Westek Computer Services, NBI Inc., Cal Comp, Tektronix, Technic Computer Service, Prime Computer and AC3 Computing Products in the total amount of $99,937 to be funded from contract services accounts 33-413D-6028 ($63,3311 and 33-4133-6028 ($36,6061 for Fiscal Year 1989/90. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The computer equipment located throughout the City requires periodic maintenance and repair. The following vendors provide these services on cnm> of hhc hardware/<nEtwaro lnrat PA Ihrn,inhn„1 I'11P ~ . ,C ioner~mon4e These pteces of equipment/software are essential for 'the support of Geographical Information Systems, Management Infarma lion Systems, Mapping and Word Processing functions within the City. SUMMARY: Following is a breakdown of these services Westek Computer Services - (Personal Computers 6 Printers) - $31,428 NBI Inc. - (Word Processing) - 20,051 Cal Comp - iPlotters and Digitizers) - 3,072 Tektronix - (Graphic 'fermi nalsl - 1,396 ACJ Computing Products - (Apple Products) - 7,384 Technic Computer Serv. - (Impact Printer) - 3,000 Prime Computer - (Mini Computer) - 33,606 City Council StaEE Report CONTRACTS FOR CODiPUfER MAINTENANCE July 19, 1989 Page Z R e ally su~e-w^r~ Jerry H. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JHF:de Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 J~: . ~i To: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Ntllie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of a Joint Use Agreement between Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation and reconstruction of 66 KY power poles along the north side of Base Line Road from Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenue RECBMEIDATIBN: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution aDDroving the sub,{ect agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the said agreement. Background/Analysis Killiam Lyon Company is required to construct the Base Line Raad street improvements between Milliken Avenue and Rxhester avenue in conjunction with the development of their Victoria Vineyard South project. As a part of the construction, it is necessary to relocate and reconstruct the existing 66 KV power poles along the north side of Base Line Road. This Joint Use Agreement identifies the easement Location for the Edison poles, defines the priority rights within the easement area and determines the maintenance responsibilities of the two parties. Copies of the Agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. AesD submitted, ~ i RHM:NVaJm Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~Cf - 3 ci'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A FOR RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE 66 KV POWER POLES ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM MILLtKEN AVENUE TO ROCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Joint Use Agreement, between Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation and reconstruction of 66 KV power poles along the north side of Base Line Road and generally located between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue; and WHEREAS, the relocation and reconstruction of such fac111ties described in said Joint Use Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, is to be completed by Southern California Edison Company; and WHEREAS, said Joint Use Agreement identifies the easement location, defines the priority rights within the easement area and determines the maintenance responsib111ties of the Mo parties. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Joint Use Agreement be hereby approved and the Mayor Ts hereby authorized to sign said Joint Use Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. d - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 ~~ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SU&IECT: Approval of a Joint Use Agreement between Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation and reconstruction of 66 KV power poles along the north side of Base Line Road from Haven Avenue to Valencia Avenue RECOMEIDATIBM: It 1s recommended that the Lity Council adopt the attached resolution approving the sub,~ect agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the said agreement. Background/Analysts Lewis Homes of California is required to construct the Base Line Road street lmpreveaMnLS Detween Maven Avenue a11a va lenCta avenue in consunction with the development of their Terra Vista Proiects. As a part of the construction, 1t is necessary t0 relocate and reconstruct the existing 66 KV power poles along the north side of Base Line Road. Th1s Joint Use Agreement Identifies the easement location for the Edison poles, defines the priority rights within the easement area and determines the maintenance responsibilities of the two parties. Copies of the Agreement are available in Lhe City Clerk's office. ResD t submitte~d,~ ~~~ /~ Attachment ~9 RESOLUTION N0. ~~' 3c~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JOINT USE AGREEMENT GETNEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE 66 KV POWER POLES ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM NAVEN AVENUE TO VALENCIA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Joint Use Agreement, between Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation and reconstruction of 66 KV power poles along the north side of Base Line Road and generally located between Haven Avenue and Valencia Avenue; and WHEREAS, the relocation and reconstruction of such facilities described in said Joint Use Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be compieted by Southern California Edison Company; and NHEREAS, said Joint Use Agreement identifies the easement location, defines the priority rights within the easement area and determines the maintenance responsibilities of the two parties. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HLNtUT Ht5ULYtS tnat said Jot n2 Use Agreement ce nereoy approveo and cne mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Joint Use Agreeuent on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 3~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c~^^~oy STAFF REPORT ~' c ~. ~ ~~ ~~ A F ~ I' Date: July 19, 1989 - i4;; 9 To: Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Approval of Joint Construction Agreeme nt with Cucamonga County Water District City Council approve a Joint Construction Agreement with Cucamonga County Water District for installation of a sanitary sewer line in conjunction with the East and West Beryl Park improvements and authorize the Mayor and city clerk to execute the agreement. BACKGROIIND• City Council at the March 15, 1989 meeting provided dizection to formulate an agreement with CCWD for installation of a ......_ . . i .. .f ..... ..y proposed Beryl Park Facilities. The work would be completed in conjunction with construction of the park improvements. CCWD will pay all cost related to the sewer installation. The District, in consideration for the City granting an easement for the installation, would waive all water connection fees for development of West Beryl Park. Those fees total $43,356.25. An agreement has been approved by Cucamonga County Water District Board for joint construction of the park and sewer work. City Council execution oP the agreement is required. Respeptfull~ submitted, JS:DL:bs A J_JI. I~ V~~ /~ .~ Joe ~chultz /yX\~ community Servicea~_Fianager 3~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 1989 To: Mayor, Members of the City Council, Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manage, By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Subject: Approval of Joint Use Agreement with School District for city Improv Cucamonga Elementary School Playfields Recomsendation• ~C' GJCAMp~7 ~' 3 ~. a r ~ .= OI ~iA 14 iS City of City Council approve a Joint Use Agreement with Cucamonga School District for City improvement of the playfields at Cucamonga Elementary School to be Funded Prom Park Development Account 20-4532-8926 for the amount of $195,000.00 and authorize the City Clezk to execute the agreement Background: Per City Council direction, an agreement has been Formulated with Cucamonga School District Por the renovation of Cucamonga Elementary School grounds. The plan, as shown in the appendix of the attached agreement, calla for the addition of two 175' Little League fields, two 250' softball fields, two 195' % 330' soccer fields, relocation oP the existing hardcourt area and the addition of Pour basketball courts, renovation oP the existing play area, concrete work to include sidewalks and mow curbs, expansion of vehicle parking in two locations to accommodate ± 83 care and finally, landscaping to include trees, shrubs and turf. The landscape architects estimate for the work is $482,000.00 as follows: i) Site DamoiitionjClearing $ 20,000.00 2) Grading $ 16,000.00 3) Concrete Work $ 16,000.00 4) Parking Lots $ 66,000.00 5) SPOrt Field Improvements $ 49,000.00 6) Basketball Courts $ 35,000.00 7) Play Area $ 32,000.00 .3 `~'-- 8) Irrigation $ 81,000.00 a) Parking Lots ($ 5,000.00) b) Sports Fields ($76,000.00) 9) Landscaping $122,00000 a) Parking hots ($ 13,000.00) b) Sportefielda ($109,000.00) 10) 10} Contingency S 43.700.00 Project Cost 5480.700.00 The City~s budget Por school grounds upgrading allows for renovation of Cucamonga Elementary and Etiwanda Hiqh School. Discussions with Chaffey School District regarding the high school improvements are continuing. Per the Cucamonga School District request, all work on the Elementary site will have to be completed at times when school is not in session. sy utilizing existing city contracts for equipment rental, a phase development at the Elementary School could sae the sportfield and basketball courts installed this summer. The work would include landscaping and irrigation of the four ballfields and one soccer field. Cost for the work is estimated at ciu5-nnn_nn The second phase would include the parking lot and playground. Those spaces are currently occupied with portable classrooms. They are anticipated to be surplus '6Y"' "- -'' ~` nGhuui yaoa aiiuwiuy Li,n impcvvnmence to be completed in the summer of 1990. Work on lighting the high school fields will require approval by the State Architects Office. The process takes numerous months. As a consequence the project will have to be scheduled for the summer oP 1990. To begin work on the projects, City Council authorization and execution of the Agreement with Cucamonga School District is needed. RespzOtfully submitted, r ~ G,;r'f- -~ Jo ~SChultz co~unity Sexp4lce~ Mnnager ~_ JS:DL:tp 33 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAh10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Magutre, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakoshi, Assod ate C1v11 Engineer SUBJECT: Approvai of Agreement for Installation of Public ]mprovement and Dedlcatton between Charles L. Fultz and Bernice D. Fultz and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements located along the southeast corner of Victoria Street and East Avenue for the Victoria Street Protect - East Avenue to Etiwanda High School. RECOMIEIOATIOM: It is recommended that City council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Insta11at1on of Pub11c Improvement and Dedlcatton between Charles L. Fultz and Bernice D. Fultz and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKEROUMD/AWILVSIS• The attached sub,~ect Agreement between the City and Charles L Fultz and Bernice D. Fultz provides for street improvements which include street pavement, curbs, gutters, driveway, and do necessary clearing and grubbing along Mr. and Mrs. Fultz' street frontaer. Mr. anA wrc Fnitr havo wnrwn ~,. grant to the City a Roadway Easement to ailow for the widening and improvement of Victoria Street in return for Lhe construction of said lmprovemenLS. Sa1d street improvements will be constructed in con,~unction w1th; the City's YTctoria Street Pro,~ect -East Avenue to Etlwanda High School. Respe ubmitted, ~c /y RHM:HM:p - - Attachment 3~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ (' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FROM CHARLES L. FULTZ AND BERNICE D. FULTZ, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of frontage improvements in conjunction with the VTctorta Street Protect - East Avenue to Etiwanda Nigh School; and NHEREAS, installation of street pavement, curbs, gutters, driveway, located along the southeast corner of Victoria Street and East Avenue shall be made a part of the Victoria Street Protect; and NHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Fultz have agreed to dedicate R1ght-of-May as reimbursement to the City for said improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the C1ty Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. RECORDING REQUESTED AND NHEN RECORDED M111L T0: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AGREEMENi FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IIPROYEIENT AMD DEDICATION This Agreement is made and entered into this day of 1989 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Charles L. Fultz and Bernice D. Fultz, (hereinafter referred to as "OMNER") for the installation of certain public improvements Including, but not limited to street pavements and curbs and gutters and do necessary clearing and grubbiny along the southeast corner of Victoria Street and East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals li) CITY has prepared plans and specifications for, and presently contemplates the installattan of, public improvements along Victoria Street from East Avenue to Etlwanda High School. (The VicLOrla Street Nidening Pro,)ect Plans ar~d Specifications are made an integral part hereof of this Agreement). (1i) ONNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 227-141-47, at the southeast corner of Victoria Street and East Avenue which Droperty is within the limits of the YicWrla Street Nidening Pra,~ect and described as follows: ~~ A portion of the west 126 feet of the north 165 feet of Lot 4, Block L, Ettwanda Colony Lands, as recorded in Book 2 of Maps, Page 24, Records of San Bernardino County, more particularly described as follows: Begi nnin$ at a point on the northwest corner of Lot 4, thence south 89 49' 28" east, 9.96 feet along the south line of Yictarla Street, having a half width of 33 feet to the beginning of a 34 foot radius circular arc, concave to the southeast with a radial bearing of south 440 55' 25" east, thence southwesterly along did circular arc 26.70 feet through a central angle of 44 59' 19" to a point being the terminus of said arc and on the east line of East Avenue, having a half width of 33 feet end said point being tangent to said east line, thence north 00 OS' 16" cast 24.05 feet along said east line of East Avenue to the point of beginning. Attached hereto is a plat labeled "Exhibit 8". (iii) ONNER desires to participate in the Victoria Street M1dening Project so as to dedicate necessary Rights-of-May related to street frontage improvements along Its property at the southeast corner of Victoria Street and East Avenue ("the Fultz Portion" hereinafter). CITY is willing to inciude the Fultz Portion within the Victoria Street Nidening Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOM THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OMNER as follows: 1. OVMER shall execute a Oeed of Easement 1n favor of CITY for street right-of-wey and related purposes in form and content identical to that attached hereto as Exhlblt "A". 2. CITY is authorized to cause OkNER's Deed of Easement t0 be recorded forthwith uROn execution of this Agreement and Ctty shall furnish copy of the recorded Easement Deed to the ONNER upon recordation. 37 3. CITY shall include the Fultz Portion as a part of the construction of the Victoria Street Nidening Prolect and shalt cause all necessary public improvements to be installed in accordance with CITY's plans and specifications therefor. 4. OVAVER agrees to grant to CITY, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and contractors such rights of entry and/or temporary construction easements as are deemed necessary by CITY's City Engineer to cause the completion of the Fultz Portion. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the other party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 7. This Agreement is binding upon and shall insure to the benefits of the .Hn Fn nJw nd ~~ LFn1. nNo AnJ .. ~.In aAwJ nJe~w, ~n Yom. ~~ ..~.. .u ~ ij.~r .~ ~ , ..u.r ~. , .. ~ ~. , successors or assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 8. This Agreement supersedes any and ail other agreements, whether oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the sub,{ect matter hereof. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which 1s not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shalt be valid or binding. Aqy modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if 1t is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed thls Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation BY: enn s u ayor PROPERTY OMMER Charles L. Fultz Bernice D. Fultz TITLE: 'I BY: r~ "- TITLE: RECOMME F,D~~APPjDVAL: i ~ ,~Z~~ u a u re ct t igtrre~r ATTEST: every u e e y er APPROVED AS TO FORM: y rney .3~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On 19 before me the un ers gne o ary u c, persona y appeare , an A. AUTNELET personally known to be to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed it. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL o ary gna ure STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this the day, of before me, the un ers gne o ary u c persona y appeare , ( ) personally known Lo me ( ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged tha executed tt. WITNESS MY NANO AND-DFFLCIAI-SEAC o ary gna ure NOTE: WHEN DOCUMENT IS EXECUTED eY A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGEEMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A CORPORATION/PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Engineer ~; SUBJECT: Approval of Rei~ursement Agreement for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities, for Development Review 86-07, located at the northeast Corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue, submitted by Arical Properties, Incorporated - UR 002 RECOMENOATION: It is recormaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utility lines at the intersection of 6th Street and Haven Avenue, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of DR 86-07, the developer was required to wiJeryrvunJ Lice urerireuu util ltj 116e; w, it; frcr~t.:-y: a.'.c of ah Street. Since the Dro~ect is a corner development (northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street), the limits of undergrounding included undergrounding of the overhead utility lines across Haven Avenue to the neareast power pale westerly of the intersection. Pursuant to Planning Conealsston Resolution No. 87-96, and the condition of approval of said development, the developer has requested to enter into a reimbursmeent agreement with the City to be reimbursed for a portion of the undergrounding costs from the adiacent properties directly benefiting from said undergrounding. Assessor's Parcel No's 209-262-20, 210-072-11, and 210-081-13, as indicated on the attached exhibit, are currently undeveloped. Therefore, at the time of future development of said parcels, the developers will be required W submit payments for reimbursement of one-half of the undergrounding costs for the frontage of their developements. ~' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 86-07 - UR 002 JULY 19, 1989 PAGE 2 Assessor's Parcel No. 109-411-16 is currently developed. Therefore, coneributTon toward the sub,~ect undergrounding may become possible at the time of CTty's conditioning of future redevelopment of said parcel. The Engineering staff has approved the total cost of the undergrounding and the distribution of the costs among the benefit parcels as indicated on Exhibit "D" of the attached Agreement. The City has provided 10 days notice prior to the date of Council's meeting to those Darcels affected by this Agreement. Respe y~ submitted, :SB• Attachment 1 ~~ RESOWTION N0. ~~- 3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON JUNE 8, 1989 BY ARICAL PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON 6TH STREET AT THE INTERSECTION OF HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Reinbursement Agreement executed on June 8, 1989, by Aricai Properties, incorporated , as developer of DR 86-07 for the undergrounding of overhead utilities (UR 002) on 6th Street at Haven Avenue Intersection; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said undergrounding operation; and WHEREAS, the owners of the ad3oining properties will share 1n the expense of the undergrounding operation costs as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Rei~ursement Agreement on behalf of the City o9 Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreement to record. ~~ - CITY OF kANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: APROVAL TO AMEND CONTRACT CO-86-053 FOR VECTOR CONTROL RECOMAENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve e amen ed contract for services provided by Nest Valley Victor Control. II. BACKGROUND: Nest Valley Vector Control has performed services for e con ro of flies, rats and mosquitos since 1986. Prior to this contract, vector control services were provided by the County of San Bernardino, also on a contract basis. The primary reason for the change was a comaitment by West Valley Vector Control to provide a program more specialized to the City's needs; specifically, to concentrate efforts on eradicating the heavy ceamnal fly nnnula ti nn. Since fly eradication was a mayor emphasis of the original contract, the mafority of the allocated services were stipulated for this purpose. The success of the lector Control program and the development of areas previously used far agricultural purposes, such as chicken ranching, have reduced the proportion of fly related probiems. As a result, the allocation of services between fly, rat and mosquito control requires ad,~ustment. III. ANALYSIS: The amended contract 1s substantially the same as the or-fg~T- Rather than stipulating only a fly control program, vector control for files, rats, and mosquitos has been included. In practice, the actual range of services provided will be unchanged. Only the ability to allocate resources where they are needed will be affected. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Juiy 19, 1989 Page 2 The allocation of contract resources is determined by current conditions within the City. The types, quantity and locations of reported problems will determine aqy future ad,~ustment to the ratio of services. Such ad,~ustments, if needed, would be proposed by Nest Valley Vector Control when each quarterly report of services Ts submitted to the Pianning Division. The decision to alter the allocation of services would then require City approval. IY. CONCLUS20N: Nest Valley Vector Control has provided a quality serves the City for three years. They have met their commitment to provide a high degree of specialized services. The proposed contract amendment will allow flexibility in meeting the changing needs of the City by allowing aW ustments to the ratio of vector control services. The amendment should have a positive effect on the overall vector control program. Resp su , Bra Bul City er BB:RA:,15 Attachments: Contract (CO 86-053 Amendment) Exhibit "A" - Contract CO 86-053 ~~ WBST VALLBY VBCTOR CONTROL DISTRICT 13766 ARAPAHOS PLACE CHINO, CA 91710 Contract for vector control services with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the West Valley Vector Control Diste ict, hereinafter called Distc ict, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter called city, on the W ITNESSETH WHEREAS, District was ccea ted to provide effective and efficient vector control strategies to protect and enhance the quality of life in the West San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, District is a body corporate and politic and a public agency of the state empo weced' to make contracts, employ staff, and perf ocm all duties and cesponsibilit ies assigned, delegated or allowed by the California Health and Safety Code, oiv ision 3, Chapter S, Section 2200 et. seq.; and WHEREAS, City desires to provide vector control to its incorporated area; and WHEREAS, City desires to enter into an agreement with District for vector (flies, mosquctoes, ana cocencs; conrcoi within the City; and WHEREAS, District has the capability to provide the necessary supporting functions, material, equipment and personnel to carry out the present and ongoing functions of vector control; and WHEREAS, City and District will mutually benefit by such an agreement: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: A. District shall: 1. Pcov3de to city all necessary setvicea, supplies, equipment and employee(s) to catty out provisions of this agreement as requested and approved by the City Council. 2. Assign said employee(s) to specifically perform the work and services provided herein for the City. Such employee(s) shall be under the sole direction of the District Manager as designated by the District Board of Trustees. Any requests by City personnel for work and/or service will be routed through the District Ma nag(^prior to implementation. 'f~ 3. Establish a se pace to accounting fund for this Vector Co ntcol Program and make quarterly reports to City. Dpon reasonable notice to the Dis tcict. City shall be entitled to inspect, during normal business hours, the books and cecocds pertaining to the agreement. 4. Surveillance a. District will establish fly and mosquito traps to objectively monitor such insect populations on a weekly oc other appropriate periodic basis during the contract. b. Monitor degree-day temperatures to predict fly emeegence dates. c. Inspect and treat existing sources of vector production on a schedule appropriate to ensure acceptable control. d. Maintain cecocds of complaints, vector surveys, inspections and control. Reports shall be submitted to City on a quarterly basis. e. Survey suspect areas to establish existence of entities capable of vector production. 5. Education. District shall provide the following services as tome permits: a. Instruct individuals and groups on current vector control measu rea around the home. b. Present information to schools and classes on current vector control measures. c. Prepare media vector control information of community intecea t. Information to be approved by City prior to media release. 6. Compliance a. Issue correction and abatement notices as necessary to abate vector breeding conditions. b. Investigate and maintain a log of vector complaints made by citizens. 7. Control a. Sm element biological control stca tegies in appropriate areas. 7 4( Z b. Apply registered, approved pesticides to control immature and; or adult vectors as necessazy. 8. The Dis tr ic[ shall use California Health and Safety Code, Division 3, Chapter 5, Section 2200 et. seq. in the administration of the vec toc control program in the absence of or in conjunction with any action by the City to adopt an ordinance regarding vector breeding. All fees, fines or liens collected by District pursuant to the above code shall 6e retained by District. Any such amounts retained by the District shall be deducted fzom any fees otherwise owing the District from the City. 9. Throughout the to cm of this Agreement, at District's sole cost and expense, District shall keep, oz cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of City and Distcic t, com pcehe ns ive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from District's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) £or bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.80) for property damage. All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required herein shall name as additional inau[eds the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall u~ .~~~• ~_*~._: n.titn ~n •Ac effon• fhaf• yuagC .. __ .. (1)~the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and City's elected officials, officers, em ployeea, and agents: (2) the policies ace primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be caccied by City; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except of ter thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to City by certified mail. District shall furnish City with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, oc certificate evidencing the insuzance. District may effect Eoc its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 10. District shall hold harmless City from any and all claims or cou ct actions of whatsoever kind oc na to ce for damage to property or personal injury, including death, which may arise from any act caccied on under thin agreement by District's officers, employees, agents ~r representatives, unless said act was performed in response to a directive from City personnel that was not approved by the District Manager. This hold harmless s hall include legal representation in court except Eoc the situation previously described. B. City shall: "`'i' 1. Pay Eoc and ee eive the rights and benefits of all services rendered by District, including those activities specified under Paragzaph A of this agxeemeni and such other agreements as necessary between the Distzict and City. 2. City agrees to pay the cost of this service upon quarterly billings by District not to exceed the current agzeed upon amount. This cost is to include: a. Houely labor charges paid by District to employee(s) for sa lazy{ies) and benefits properly chargeable [n this agreement. b. The cost of pesticides and biological control agents at District cost. c. The cost of vehicle travel at the current rate established by the Internal Revenue Service. d. The cost of support functions and materials. e. The providing for Dis tcict employee of office space and telephone service in City facilities. 3. City shall hold harmless District from any and all claims or court actions of whatsoever kind or nature foz damage to property or personal injury, including death, which may arise from any act carried on pursuant to Paragraph B a C of this agreement by City's officers, employees, agents or representatives. This hold harmless shall include legal C... ~~ .. .• ... C. City and District jointly agree: 1. Either party may terminate this agreement with or without cause at any time by giving sixty (6A) days written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials completed under an audit shall become the sole and exclusive property of the District. If this agreement is terminated by City as provided herein, the District shall be paid actual prog rese expe na ea, or proportion thereof if final period is leas than a full month, payable as provided herein through the date of such Germination. 2 City may be regui:ed from time to time to mo3ify the scope of the services of District to be performed he reundec, including, but not limited to, increasing the number of applications cc treatments or modifications of the contract period. Such modifications shall cause an appropriate increase or decrease in the amount of the DisLC is t'a compensation and changes in the term of this agreement, and when mutually agreed upon by and between the District and City, shall be effective when incorporated in writt'4e/n9amendments to this agreement. 1 ( 4 3. this agreement shall be effective on , and shall remain in effect until terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the pa dies hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto affixed by their respective proper off icecs thereunto duly authorized. District President, Board of Trustees WWCD City Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga District Manager Approved as to Form: Date Bruce Lance, Jr. District Counsel ~~ City Clerk Approved as to Focm: City Attorney 5 THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the Nest Valley Vector Control District, hereinafter called the District, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter called City, on the second day of June, 1986. W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, District was created to provide effect i•re and zffic ient vector control strategies to protect and enhance the quality of life in the Nest San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, District is a body corporate and politic and a public agency of the state empowered, to make contracts, employ staff, and perform all duties and responsibilities assigned, delegated or allowed by the California Health and Safety Code, Oiv is ion 3, Chapter 6, Section 2200 ex. seq.: and WHEREAS, City desires to provide vector control to its incorporated area; and WHEREAS, City desires to enter into an agreement with District for fly control wfthin the City; and WHEREAS, District has the capability to Drovide the necessary supporting functions, material, equipment and personnel to carry out the present and ongoing functions of fly control; and WHEREAS, City and District will mutually benefit by such an agreement: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: A. District shall: 1. Provide to C!ty alt necessary services, supplies, equipment and employee(s) to carry out provisions of this agreement as requested and approved by the City Council. 2, gssign said employee(s) to specifically perform the work and services provided herein for the City. Such S~ employee(s) shall De under the direction of the District Manager as designated by the District Board of Trustees. 3, Establish a separate accounting fund for this Fly Control Program and make quarterly reports to City. Upon reasonable notice to the District, City shall be entitled to inspect the books and records pertaining to the agreement during normal business hours. 4. Surveillance a. District wili establish baited fly traps of its own design to objectively monitor fly population on a weekly basis during the contract. b. Monitor degree-day temperatures to predict fly emergence dates. c. Inspect existing commercial poultry ranches on a monthly schedule and/or more frequently as needed. d. Maintain records of complaints, fly surveys, inspections and control. Reports shall be submitted to City on a monthly basis. e. Inspect backyard farm/animal activities and stables as identified and on a complaint basis. 5. Educ a_t ion. District shall orovide the following services as time permits: a. Instruct individuals and groups on current fly control measures around the home. b. Present information to schools and classes on current fly control oeasures. c. Prepare media information of community and specific fly control progress. Information to be approved by City prior to media release. 6. Compliance a. Issue correction and abatement notices as necessary to abate fly breeding conditions. b. [nves4igate and maintain a log of fly complaints by citizens. 2 5~-- 7. Control a. Release approximately five million Chalcids for biological control of fly larvae and pupae in selected areas. b. Apply residual adulticides and non- residual aerosol adulticides on an emergency basis to prevent dispersal or control local fly outbreaks as determined by district. _. Apply residual fly spray to trash dumpsters in commercial areas once per month during the months of June, July, August and September. 8. The Oistrfct shall use California Health and Safety Code, Division 3, Chapter 5, Section 2200 et. seq. in the administration of the fly control program in the absence of action 6y the City to adopt an ordinance regulatfng fly breeding. R11 fees, fines or liens collected by District pursuant to the above code shall be retained by District. Any such amounts retained 6y the District shall be deducted from any fees otherwise owing the District from the City. 9. The District shall respond to rodent complaints on an as needed basis. Response by District shall not account for more than 10% of District's total man hours needed to provide services herein. 10. Throughout the term of this Agreement, at District's sole cost and expense, District shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of City and District, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from District's activities, providfng protection of at least One Million Dollars (51,000,006.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (i1 ,000,000.00) for property damage. All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shalt be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do 3 S3 business in the State of California and policies required herein and shall name as additional insureds City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that: (I) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and City's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried ~y City; and (3) they cannot De cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to City by certified mail. District shall furnish City with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. District may effect for its awn account insurance not required under this Agreement. I1. District shall hold harmless City from any and all claims or court actions of whatsoever kind or nature for damage to property or personal injury, including death, which may arise from any act carried on under this agreement by District's officers, employees, agents or representatives. This hold harmless shall include legal representation in court. B. City shall: 1. Pay for and receive the rights and benefits of all services rendered by District, including those activities specified under Paragraph A of this agreement and such other agreements as necessary between the District and City. 2. City agrees to pay the cost of this service upon quarterly billings by district not to exceed {36,720 per year, This cost is to include: a. Hourly labor charges paid by Ois tri o to employees for salaries and benefits properly chargeable to this agreement. b. The cost of pesticides and biological control agents at District cost. c. The cost of vehicle travel at 21 cents per mile. d. The cost of printing educational materials. e. Drovide District employee office space and telephone service in City facilities. 3. City shall hold harmless District from any and all claims or court actions of whatsoever kind or nature for damage to property or personal injury, including death, which may arise from any act carried on pursuant to Paragraph D 8 C of this agreement by City's officers, employees, agents or representatives. This hold harmless shall include legal representation in court. C. City and District jointly agree: 1. Either party may terminate this agreement with or without cause at any time by giving 60 days written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials completed under an audit shall become the sole and exclusive property of the District. If the agreement is terminated by City as provided herein, the District shall be paid actual progress expenses, or proportion thereof if final period is less th a^ a full month, payable as provided herein through the date of such termination. 2. City may be required from time to time to modify the scope of the services of District to be performed hereunder, including, but not limited to, increasing the number of applications or treatments or modifications of the contract period. Such modifications shall cause an appropriate increase or decrease in the amount of the District's compensation and changes in the term of this agreement, and when mutually agreed upon by and between the District and City, shall be effective when incorporated in written amendments to this agreement. 3. This agreement shall be effective on June 2, 1986, and shall remain in effect until terminated. 5 5S IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto su CSCribed and their respective seals to be hereunto affixetl by their respective proper officers thereunto duly authorized. .District ~. ~ ~ p11~_. `~.\~~ C, es en oar o ru, ees West Valley VCD // ~ 111-~ Gen€ryl tTa nager~ Approved as to Form: Date ~~ / G uce Lance, , District Counsel Date C1ty Attorney ,~ 6 Approved as to Form: --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~' `~ DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ' FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Ctty Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMEIOATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 13555 have been canpleted in an acceptable manner and it is reconaended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f13,300 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount Of 5133,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13555 - located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Mt. BalQy Place. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development ~~ ., Los Angeles, CA 90067 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f13,300 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5133,000 Respectfu submitted, / _ ~~~--~_T. L-RHM:SFG: dlr Attachment 57 RESOLUTION N0. ~g'.3~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13555 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13555 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEFEFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and fT1e a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ~, RECOMIEIOAT[OM: The required street faprovements for Tract 13562 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is reconmended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 516,500.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5165,000.00. Background/Analysis Tract 13562 - located on the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Vintage Drive DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development VG114Y1) YIn lpi 4, ~V14G •JJV Los Angeles, CA 90067 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 16,500,00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5165,000.00 Respec submitted, ' r i i ,<- - R~YS:$IIGtS~~ Attachment s9 RESOLUTION N0. g9 3 d{1 A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CPLIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEIR:NTS FOR TRACT 13562 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13562 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Ctty Engineer is authorized to sign and f11e a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 't' V - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Horks Inspector`"' SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECCMMEMDATION: ,~; ;~? The required street improvements for Tract 13022 Nest have been coagleted in an acceptable manner and it is recomwended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of (42,000 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Ceagletton and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5420,000. Background/Analysis Tract 13022 Nest - located on the northwest corner of Fairmont Ndy and Milliken Avenue. DEYELOPER: William Lyon Company o~A~ ~rCh1 :11: ~'1~::::: C ~I ~n N Rancho Cucamonga, CA ~ 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) (42,000 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f420,000 Respe ubmitted, // ~ 'r _~"""~~ - ..-- RHM:S :dlw ~ Attachment ~1 RESOLUTION N0. ~ /' 3 d' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13022 WEST AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13022 West have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Norks Inspector ~;,. ~r SUBJECT: Accept the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain (Assessment District 82-1), Contract No. 89-024 as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file "Notice of Completion". RECQ/EIbATIOM: It is recommended that the Ctty CouncTi accept the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain (Assessment District 82-1), Contract 9-024 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5122,918.70 and authorize the release of the retention Tn the amount of (15,111.41 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 5122,918,75, 35 days after the recordation of said notice 1f ra claims have been received and acceptance of the lOL Maintenance Bond. Background/Anaiysls ine suo,7 ect project nas been campieced in accoraance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is 515,114.05 which includes one change order for additional construction of RCB adjacent to existing sewer laterals. The original amount approved by Council was 5135,211.00. Respectf 11 ybmltted, / / /- R d-~ ~. cc: Purchasing RESOLUTION N0. ~ p- ~© A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMYINGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC If8'ROVENENTS FOR JERSEY 80ULEVAAD STORM DRAIN (6TN STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1), CONTRACT N0. 89-024 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NOAK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain (6th Street Industrial Area, Assessment District 82-I ), Contract No. 89-024 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Compietlon with the County Recorder of San 8ernardlno County. ~I --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: F~ichael D. Long, Senior Public Works Inspector ~, ~.' `i SUBJECT: Accept the Etiwanda Area Rehabilitation I and II, Contract No. 88-161 as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" RECOMENDATION: It is recoawended that City Council accept the Etlwanda Area Rehab111tai1on I and Ii, Contract No. 88-161 as complete, authorize the City to file a "Notice of Completion" authorize the release of the Faithful Derformance Bond in the amount of 5165,992,80, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 514,213.74 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 5165,992.80, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and acceptance of the 10X maintenance bond in the amount of 528,427,48, Also, approve the final contract amount of 5284,274.77. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subJect protect has been completed to accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount if 3284,274.77 which Includes 3 change orders for additional lot grading, pavement thickness increase and addition of crushed aggregate base. Resp f y sL ltted, ~~~_ /~ e ~ ' :d1w Attachment J RESOLUTION N0. ~ 9.3 3 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ETINANDA AREA REHABILITATION I AND II, CONTRACT N0. 88-161 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Of COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public ingrovements for the Etiwanda Area Rehabilitation I and II, Contract No. 88-161 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. HON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is autherized to sign and f71e a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. `f' p ----- CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOR,T ' DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector i SUBJECT: Accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the I Intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 88-166 as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notice of Completion" RECO~EIDATIOM: It is reconaended that City Council accept the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 88-166 as complete, authorize the City to file a "Notice of Completion authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 593,225.00, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 55,902.29 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of 593,225.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract anaunt of iiio,vy~.Gu. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The sub,iect pro,~ect has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount if 5118,045.88 which lnctudes 2 change orders for changes in the contract as directed by Cal trans which included maJor modifications to the street Improvements. Resp f y~submitted, /i ~~" .~ ~P RRM:MBL.~Tw Attachment ~7 RESOLUTION N0. X ~- ~d' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUDLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ETINANDA AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, CONTRACT N0. 88-166 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COPWLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Ettwanda Avenue and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 88-166 have been completed to Lhe satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~-P V - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: Cify Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate CTvil Engineer i ~i SUBJ ECi: Approval W accept the detachment of Tract Na. 12559-1, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street, and Tract No. 12870, located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and to annex Tract Nos. 12659-1 and 12870 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and setting the date of public hearing for August 16, 1989. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that CTty Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the detachment of Tract Nos. 12659-1 and 12870 from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, approving the Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the subJect tracts Lo Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. Background/Analysis Presently Tract Nd. 12659-1, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda .~_ _e avenue and [wtn street, and Tract rie. i2oTv, iutuLeJ u,. t~K north Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, are included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, but the recently approved Landscape Maintenance District Master Plan Area suggests that these tracts be included 1n the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. Staff recommends that the subJect tracts be detached from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and annexed into Landscape Maintenance No. 7. Presently these tracts are unoccupied and are currently under construction. Attached for Council consideration is a resolution approving the detachment and annexation and a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subject annexation. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation farm signed by the developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Resp~rNy`~~ltted, - RHM:JS:sd Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ~ ` -3,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIYING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION OF TRACT NOS, 12659-1 AND 12870 TO LANDSCAPE M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 NHEREAS, on July 19, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the Ctty Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and flied with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any Dart thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE DE (T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the Itemized costs and expenses o~ s~ai~work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descrf6ed-in said report, the boundaries of the subdiv151ons of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District 1n proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said vrork and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for tFe purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. 7 O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 for Mnexation of Tract Nos. 12659-1 and 12870 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 1S of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. The City Council has deterwtned that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12659-1 and 12870 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and SDecifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference 1s hereby made t0 the sub,{ect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped Improvement on the Individual development is - r«3dv - -f ~`i. ~ ~t LO t~^. -.„,_ .'t^.nt __ it a1A_ nla _ _nA ~Y" specifications were attached hereto. ~ ~~ SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No casts wt 11 be fncurred for parkway improvement construction. A11 improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (f.35) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 inciuding this Annexation 1s as follows: Existing District (Phase 1 omens -ruction) Landscape Area (Sq. Ft.) 268,482 Trees (Ea.) 572 No, of D, U. -7 / 113 This New Mnex. Total 60,500 328,982 261 833 205 318 Per Lot Annual Assessment 328,982 x 50.35 = 5115,144 833 x 55.00 f 4,165 TOTAL 5119,309 5119,309 = 5375.19 318 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A and "Exhibit B", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhere there is Hare than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number or aweiiing uniu per ioc or parcei. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to detenntne the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the Ctty during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7, Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers ali testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year 1n May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5, Every year 1n June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 7~- Properties and iaproveeents to 6e included within this annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U Sit • ~: aF chi 12659-1 138 Interior Streets --- --- 221 12870 67 Etiwanda Ave. --- 23,000 40 Trail _ 3_7500_ TOTAL --- 60,500 261 ~3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ,I . ~Y~ ~,0~ C1Ti 01 AANC80 COCA1[OlIQA 5~,~_~~: COUZI'P! 0>1 SAN BSINAEDII~iO `; `~~ SPATi 01 CALU~O)Rt~IIA .~ N A33ESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 s.~y! C1T! OI RANCHO COCA1[OIfGA ODUIPP't 0! RAN HaNAtDII~tO n 7R. iz e 70 °~~ 8PA17 Ot CALQ~ORNL- ExNiai r e: :.. 6 ~ N 6„ -~,- RESOLUTION N0. gq'_ J 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DETACHMENT OF TRACT NOS. 12659-1 AND 12870 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ND. 1 AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION OF SAID TRACTS TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING ANO LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, Tract Nos. 12659-1 and 12870 work program areas are included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 1; and WHEREAS, the design of the Yandscaping of Tract Nos. 12659-1 and 12870 is compatible with the design of landscaping of adtacent tracts included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLYES: Section 1. That Tract Nos. 12654-1 and 12870 be detached from Landscape ntenance District No. 1 and be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. Section 2. Thet Notice is hereby given that on August 16, 1989, at the hour Vim. in the City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any oblectlons to the nrL n or~onl of fhn aee nccmonl M tf ri r* maV anaPar and Show f. A IItP rNV Said work should not be done or carried out ~or wiry said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution or Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or ob,~ections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protests must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Section 3. That all the work herein proposed shall be done and carried t rou-h gn in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division i5 pf 4.he Strpefe And Highray5 Code of the State of Calt: ornla. Section 4. That a published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6931 of LFe Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once Tn The~Oaily Re~ort_, a newspaper of general circulation published to the City of ntar0 10, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 7 ORDINANCE NO. 58-D ae follows: AN OADINANCB OP TH6 CITY COVNCIL OF THH CITY OP RANCHO COC.4MONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 12.08.040(A) TO TFiB RANCHO CUCAHONOA MUNICIPAL CODH PERTAINING TO AN EXEMPTION PRON TFffi CONSTRUCTION OP SI DHNALKS ON CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL STREETS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain SECTION 1: Chapter 12.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Section 12.08.040{A) to be read, in words and figures, ae follows: "12.08.040(A1 o t Re m nta. A. The provieione of Chapter 12.08.040 shall exclude the construction of sidewalks on ceeidential streets which have been epecif ienlly exempted by resolution of the Ciiy Council. B. Paragraph A above shall apply only to thpee ceeidential attests, or portions of residential arrests, which acs of each a unique nature that would set them apart from the general city. Examples would include some hllleids developments, portions of streets abutting areas where sidewalks have not been required in the past, or areas where a sidewalk could not be constructed due to existing or proposed physical conettainta ae determinad by the City Snglnear. SECTION 2: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered oc declared invalid 6y any final court action Sn a court of compeieni ~urisdict ion, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provieione, sections, oara9raphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain Sn full force and effect. SRCTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within tifteen (15) tlaye after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Callforniar and citculnted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 77 ORDINANCE N0. ~~ / ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMO NG A, CALI FO ANSA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OP A SPECIAL TA% IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT WH8A8AE, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to ae the ^legielat ive body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceed- ings, held a public hearing, contlucted an election antl received a favorable vote from the qualified electors ralat ing to ens levy of a special tax In a community facilit lee district, all ae authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Fecilit iee Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Tit Le 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (hereinafter referred to ae the "Act^). Th1e community Fecilit iee DLet: Lct shall hereinafter be referred to a• COMMVNITY FACILITIES DTSTR ICT NO. 88-2 (he relnaEt er referred to as the "Diatrice"~; and, NOW, THEREFORE, IT I8 HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: SEL"fION 1. That the above recitals ace all true and correct. SECTION 2. That this legislative body dose, by the peas age of this Ordinance, authorize the levy of ef+ocial taxes at the rate and formula and set forth Ln Exhibit "A" attached hereto, referencod and so incorporated. SECTION 3. That thLe lagis let lve body ie Mreby further authorizetl~each year, by Reao lution, tc dstermine the spec if lc special tax rate and amount to be levied for the next fiscal yaer, except that the special tax rate to be 18 vi ed shall not wxrwed that ax mt s.. ~~h v~~, w:. _.. _....____ .. L1.a :., ••" tot special tax may be levied at a lower rate. SECTION 4. Properties or ant it iee of the State, Federal or other local governments shall, except ae otherwise providetl in Section 53317.3 of the Government Code of the State of Celifornle, bs exempt from the anove-referenced and approved epecinl tax. SECTION 5. The proceeds of the above authorized and levied spec Lal tax may only be used to pay, in whole or in part, t~;e costs of the following, In the following order of pr lority: A. Payment of print Lpal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtadneee. .,. Necaaeaty replanlahment of bond reswrve fundw nr o!ner _____,_ fundy C. Payment of costa and expan ono of authorized public faell ltlee, eery lose, and tnc Ldant el expsnse• pursuant to the Act. D. Repayment of edvencss end loano, as epproprlate. The proceeds of the special tax shell be levLOd only se long a• needed for Ste purpose, end shall not be used Eor any other purpose. SECTION 6. The above authorized spec Lel tax shall be collected '.n the came manner ae ord lnery ad valorem taxes are collected and shall be subj eat to the same penalties end tM same proeetlure, Bale and lien priority in Gees cE delinquency ae is provided for ad valorem taxes. SECTION 7. The aDOVe authorized special tax ehail be secured by the lien Lmpoeetl pursuant to Saetlona 3116.5 and 3119.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the Stat• O1 California, which lLen shall De a continuing Lien and shall secure each levy of the special tax. The Lien of the spec Sal tax shall continua Sn force and of tact until the special tax obligation ie prepaid, permanently eatietietl and cancelled in accordance with Section 93344 cf the Government Cotle of the State of California or until the special tax ceases to be levied by the legle la^_ive hotly of the local Agency in the manner provided in Section 53330.5 of said Government Code. SECTION 7, ThLe Ordinance Le adopted under the apaci[lc author Lze[ion of Section 53340 of the Government Code of ens State of California. SECTION e. The CSiy Clerk shall sign this Ordinance and ehnll Gauss the same to be published wltnln fifteen (IS) days after it• passage at least once in the oAILY REPORT, a newspaper of general circulation publLehetl and circulated in thL Clty. INTAOOVCSO AND FIRST AEAD at a regular meeting of the Clty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CallCornla, on , 1989; ANO TNEPEAFTER AOOPTRD et a rem,l ar maaninn of me r~~.. rnn....~t ns one nt ~.. Rancho Cucamonga, CnllCocnla, held on the day of 1989, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINt ABSENT: CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA STAIE OF CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY OF MNCHO CUCANONGA 9TAT6 OF CALIFOANIA ~9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCNMONGA COMMVNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 99-2 EXHIBIT "A" The Reeclution of Intent ion ref ere to this Exhibit for an explanation cE the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes eo ae to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed community Facilities District to set imate the maximum amount that would be required for payment for such landowner's or resident's property. SPECIAL TAZ "A" - PVSLIC lACILITIES PROPERTY CATEGORIES There era two cetegorlee of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which are identified e• follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property ident hied ae a single Tax Aeaeeeor's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued ae of May 31 of any year. 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property whLc h, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax ^A^, ls: (i) owned Dy a public entity; (Li) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for trane- mieeion or distribution purooeee: ar iii U zoned as apace. TAIIEO CLA38IPICATI0118 AED NAIIMUM 9PECIAL TAI "A" MTi3 The taxing claee LE is atione for the above Property Cat egoriee and the maximum autho- rized Special Tax "A" rates for fiscal year 1999-1990 ars ae follows: TA%2 NG CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Reeldentlal Claee I $ 1,037 per year IMOre than 3.590 aqua re feet of dwelling unit living area) " R. Resident lei Class I? $ 769 per yeei (1,077-3,589 equeq feet of dwelling un It living arse) " C. Res ldential Cleo III $ 576 per yur ~~ (2,560-3,076 square feet of dwell lnq un It living urea) " TAXING CLASSIFICATION D. Residential Claea IV (2,309-1,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) + E. Residential Clae• V (2,051-2,307 equate feet of dwellLng unit living area) " e, Pesident la! Class v. (Lees then 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) " G. Commercial or industrial property MA%IMVM TAX MTE S 461 per year 5 394 per year S [69 per year S 3,030 per acre pec year +" 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $ 2,400 per acre per year ""+ me equate footegar of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living apace, exc Lueive of garages and other structures not used ae living apace, a• shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling un lt. "" The acreage of a commercial or industrial r.operty shall mean the gross acreage exc lueive of any acreage dedicated or offered for detl lcat ion to a public agency. +"+ The acreage of an Vndevelopad Property shall De the gross acreage exc lueive of any acreage dad Lcated or oEtered for dedication to a public agency. lDST90D O- APPORTI014021tT OI SPECIAL TAS "A^ Special Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable properly within one of the above ldent if led Pro party Cat egoriea eo long ea Spec lei Tex ^A^ wvanuea are necessary to pay authorized expanu• of the Community Pacillt lea DiatrLct related to the financing of eu[horLzad public Eacilitiee, which may include, without Ilmlta- tion, payment of debt aervlce on any bonded Lndabtednea• of the Community Pacll Stlee D istrice; replan LShment of any raga lred reserve Eund for any each bonded lntlebted- nesa; Funding of any required •ink ing Eund necauary to pay foz future public facili- ties or debt service; or direct oavna.nt for puD11c facillt ioa (^Cf'D Expanese"„ The annual levy of Special Tex "A" obeli bs apportioned ae Lollowe~ STEP 1~ Tha community EacllLtiu DLe[rict shall •etimate tM emoun[ of CPD Expenses which moat be pa ld Eor from Special Tex "A" revenues collected during the Plecal Yeer for which Lhs Special Tax "A" levy !s to 6e eetabllehad (the ^Raqu iced spec lal Ter "A^ Revenue^). 8 STEP 2: That equal percentage of Lha Special Tax '•A" rate, not to exceed 91a of [he maximum authorised 5peeial Tax "A" rata, applicable to ell Developed Property Taxing clauif icat lone neceuary to generate Special Tax "A^ revenue in the Piecal Year o! the levy equal to the Aaqulred Special Tax "A" Revenu• for such Piecal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: if add it lonel Special Tax "A^ revenues era et 111 necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum autho- risad Spacial Tax "M rats applicable to all Undeveloped Property necaa- eary to generate such additional Spselal Tex "A" revenue shall De levied on all Undeveloped P[operty. STEP 4: If add it lonel Spacial Tax "A" revenues azs still naceeaary to generate the Required Special Tax "A^ Revanua, that equal percentage of the max Lmum authorized Spacial Tax ^A" rate npplicebla to all Developed Properly Taxing Olaaaif Lcation• nacenary to genarat• ouch eddlt ional Special Tax "A" revenue Bha11 bs Touted on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Spacial Tax ^A" revenues era still necessary to generate the Required Spaclel Tex "A^ Revenue, tM community Fac Llit lea District she 11: A. Compere (L) the Special Tex ^A" rata which would bs levied on each Developed properly com6lninq STEP 2 and STEP 6 above with (11) the product resulting from mu ltiplying tM aquas toot age of the Dave loped Property time the sees Maximum Special Tex "A". The Saee Maximum Spaclel Tax ^A" means an amount equal to $0.054 par square toot of the lot ar parcel. E. I[ the product ducriDad in (li) above exceeds Lh. c...~:a: T.,, rote daacrlbad Ln (i) nDOVe for any Developed Property, the common Lty Pacilltlea Dlatrict shall lncreue the 5psclel Tax "A" rata lav led on each such Developed Property in equal psrcantegee up to the reie not to exceed the product tleecribad in (ii) above nsceoaty to genet ate ins eddit Tonal Spaclel Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Spec Lal Tax "A" Rave0uee. Notwit hatending the foregoing, the minimum Special Tax "A^ which shell be lev lad on all taxable proper[ lea within the ComqunlGy Pec111t lea District sech Piecal Year shell be: DEVELOPED PROPERTY: $ 1.00 per dwelling unit for roe idea[ Lal uses $ 1.00 per acre for comnerciel/induairial uses ~~.~a+-aLOPEO 'rAUrENTZ: 5 1.00 par lot or parcel . e ~ ( \~. SPECIAL TAI "B' - ADDITIOEAL POLICE 9EAVICES All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "B". Tne maximum aut horized Spec lal Tax "e^ rat ee for fLacal yeer 1989-1990 ere ae tolLowe: TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TA% RATE 1. DSVELOPSO PROPERTY A. Re sident Sal Claaa I 5 432 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit iiving areal 0. gaeldent Sal Claee II 5 320 per year X3,077-3,589 square feat of dweLlinq unit Living area) • C. ReeLdent lei Claee III $ 240 per year (2,564-3,076 square feat of dwelling unit living area) " D. Ree Ldentiel Cleee IV $ 192 par yeer ~2,3DB-2,963 square fut of dwell Lng un Lt living urea) E. Aeeident ial Cl~ea V 5 160 per year (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living arse) F. Resident Lal CYaae VI $ 112 per year (Lase than 2,051 square Eeet of dwelling unit living area) • O. Commercial or industrial property 51,000 per acre per year "• The mexlmum annual Spec lal Tax "B" rates shall ba aubj act tc eecalet Lon each July 1 commencLng July 1, 1990, at a rate not to exceed four percent (4!) per year. Special Tax "B" shall be Levied annually eo long ae Spacial Tax "B" Ravenuee are necessary to pay for addll ion al polLce earvlcea necessary to eerva the propert les Located within the Di•sirict. Tne "Report" of the Speclel Tex Conaultent, to be approved ea a pert o[ the record upon the conclusion o[ the publLC hearing parteLnlnq to tM Eormat ion of the community Fac ll It tee Dlatrict, shall eat forth aupplamantery details pertaining eo the Rate and Method of Apportionment of [ha Spacial Tex "A" and "B" end shall provide controlling guidance Ln the inearpratatlon and implement et ion of th l• Rate and Hethad of Apportionment. g~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 19, 1989 TO: City Council and City Manager FROH: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy Ciiy Manager ef: Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: REFUSE RATfi ADJUSTMENT RECOMMENDATION it is recommendetl the City Council approve the attached Reeolut ion adjusting the maximum reaitlent ial rote for refuse collection from $8.85 Lc $11.40 per month and a corresponding adjustment of 28.Ba in commercial rates for basis refuse service effective July 1, 1989. BAC%GROUND Staff and the three ree ident ial Hau Jere have negoti a*_ed a 52.55 (29.86) adjustment in basic refuse service. This adjustment is neceaeit at ed by a 758 increase in the County•e tipping fees. The tipping fee factor Se outside Che control of the refuse haulers. This proposed tote adjustment is reques cad to take effect July 1, 1999 and Le the only regular rate review allowed for this year. In reviewing the requested rate adjustment, the County's Dump Fee increase and applicable adju etmenta, including the Consumer Pzice Index, will be considered. Dump Pee Co art San Be rn std inc County at the Weat Valley Solid Waste Landfill site (Milliken hoe been experiencing large increases in operating and maintenance co eta due to shrinking landfill capacity, inc ceasing costa for closures, and escalatlnq concerns regartl ing the environment. These expenses and preparation for the future have resulted in the landfill fee being rained 75e effective July 1, 1984. The new fan par tan depnwltcd will be $19.50, end increase from ctn, sc per ton. This $7.95 lacreaae repre seats a direct coat of $1.81 each month per ree idea[ ial unit, The formula for this ie as follows: 1. Each residsatial unit on an average generetea two receptacles full of refuse weekly. 2. Each receptacle contains approximately 40 pounds of ceEuee (96 pounds per week). , Refuse Rate Adjustment July 19, 1989 Page 2 3. 96 pounds per week X 52 weeks = 4,992 (5,000 pounds). 4. 5,000 pounds = 2.5 tone 5. 2.5 tone X $7.95 per ton increase = $19.88 6. $19.88 per year divided by 12 months = $1.66 per month. ]. One Time Oslp Adjuatravt to Reflect the Covntp'a Dump Fee increase of $1.81 (see ettsehad documevtatiov). This $1.81 should be considered a pass through coat. Moreover. the City Council shocld be aware that $18.50 per ton is still considered a low dump fee for an urban area. As the landfill site nears capacity and alternative methods of disposal are developed, the coats will continue to rise. Consumer Price Index The Consumer Price index for the Los Angeles/Long Beach metropolitan area (a11 urban consumers) for the period April, 1988 (index 357.7) through April, 19d9 (index 3]5.8) was an increase of 5.06. If the $1.81 dump fee increase ie viewed ae a direct pass through cost to each eesident ial unit, then in essence t.^.e refuse haulers are request irq a $2.55 adjustment. This represents a 28.86 increase. Other West Valley City Refuse Rate• It is very difficult to utilize a comparison of other cities' refuse rates to tletermine equ itebility. The major comparative factor Aancho Cucamonga has with the other cities in the west Valley area is that our refuse is depos itetl at the Milliken dump site along with Ontario, Upland, Chino and Montclair. The Los Angeles cities to ouY west and the San Bernardino cities to our east utilize other landfill sites. From that point, a comparison may be made of the three other west Valley tit iee that utilize contractual refuse collection services (Chino, Upland and Mortcla Lr). These cities have three factors in common which Rancho Cucamonga does nat. These factors are: A. Mandatory Service - Upland, Chino and Montclair all have mandatory refuse collection serviced Rancho Cucamonga does not. Approximately .. -... cf Rarchc Cucamonga residents de not have refuse der: ice. ~_ retest imated half of these residents dispose of their refuse Ln'a lawful manner. The other half are utilizing some other method to dispose of their refuse (combining their refuse with neighbor e, dropping their refuse off at a commercial center without permission, or dumping their re Euee in an open field.). This unlawful disposal of refuse causes an adverse Impact on the rates for those who dispose of their refuse in a lawful manner. I ,^ ~f 'LIF Refuse Aate Adjustment July 19, 1989 Page 3 H. City Billing - Vpland. Chlno and Nontclair bill their residents directly for refuse service (included on reeident•s water bill). In Aancho Cuceaange, each hauler bills hie customers directly. The coat of accounting, ptinLin9, postage and processing has a direct Lnpact ort the rates. C. City Abeorbe Non-Payment - Upland, Chino and Nontclair pay the hauler for pickup even if the resident does not pay for refuse service. In Rancho Cucamonga, if the resident tloea not pay for the service, the hauler absorbs the lose. Refuse Service Received each complaint Lhe City receives from a resident concerning refuse service ie logged. The City has received five (5) in the pa et twelve (12) months. It should be noted that each week the haulers pick up approximately 18,000 reeideniLal unite. DO:jle 89-474 I L _NVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ~l°'I~~f COUNIy OF SAN BEANARDINO " R yt ~a Pl;a~ ~ WO~~ ;~ E~Y ® ]N NatA AnowMM Arnw • f[n f[riwdYo, CA fb16-01f0 IIt111QME1 ~ " " i ~ ~~ %/ \~ 130 [~1 D feNl • OMW, W fl76t • 171 t11f7~7b70 ~ ~\ ~~//II~~\\ PAUL F. RYAN, R, S,. MPPA ' ^ 16f06 m•k DAn • 55 ~' CA fxnx • mAl xtin/t / ~~ 1 \ O v"aw m (714) 387-46 PLFJ,1[IIEFLY TD 10DREdd CNEC[Ep uw ~"~~0°'i p1' .GMYX• Mglely N,•,w N••I,•• May 26, 1989 "`""'• °nw" a•.. n.,sro cw."e,w. CND n•aiw• E"ry•ro ~. TO: ALL CLA89 x1 RElQBE BAIILERB W W T•nW "'•^"'• Hn M,wM '--~..•^•n«m. ate... ur.•e Please immediately commence processing the enclosed wor ~.~. w. v.,e,wi. ksheet packet ~- determine your eligibility to charge higher rates. ~V Note the new 5.95E Valley Area and 5.89! rate adjustment h Mountain/Desert Area refuse s. T e Valley Area calculations include based upon the new dump Pee of $18 50 t a new component . / on app July 1, 1989. The Valley calculations al roved May 22, i l 1989 effective so nc ude tonn age adjustments. Annual tonnage per residential household was increased to 2.2 tons per household from 1.8 tons par household. Commercial rates were adjusted proportionately. The new dump fee components are: catemorv Residential ~y $ ~g~ 1.58 Inc $ rease 1.81 T $ otal 3.3g commercial S .50 S .57 S 1.07 To also expedite matters, please submit two_ comn7ot•nA .,",.l.e. "._..-.._ - auuuucLi a maoers includinc nacres 8 thrL. 1+ yhe he o no One coov to• Environmental Health services Attention: Mark Stevens 385 N. Arrowhead Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92415-0160 and ad+oliaese Auditor/Controller-Recorder Attention: Pat Cole 670 E. Gilbert St. San Bernardino, CA 92415-0910 Also enclosed is information on advertising requirements. These apply to those Class A Refuse Haulers with 500 or more residential customers and/or 1,500 cubic yards or more of commercial refuse per month. Please note where applicable, new rates may not be billed until advertising is completed. ,: Please ~xhone 714/387-4655 for further assistance. +,.. - , 1 MARK STEVENS, R. E.H.S. 4 Waste Manegnment Specialist N :, cc: Hy Weitzman ' Richard R. Hornby r~0 Attachments (J /~ n RESOLUTION NO. 89~~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI roANIA, SETTING NAXINVM RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDVSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTING WITHSN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WEBREAB, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that effective ,7uly 1, 1989 the County of San Bernardino euDetantially increased the tonnage fees for refuse d@poeited at the Rilliken Landfill Bite by 756; and N~REAB, the Ciiy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that ain<e August 1, 1988, the leaf adjustment in rates for resident iel refuse collection, there have been euhetantial increases Ln general operating expenses and employee wages by the permit refuse haulers within the City of Aanc ho Cucamonga; and WBEREAS, the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has tletermined that it is necessary for the eff iciant operation and management of the residential and commercial/industrial refuse collection service within Rancho Cucamonga that the maximum rates be adjusted. NON, TREREroR6, EE IT RESOLVED by th@ City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the rates listed below became effective July 1, 1989: SECTION 1: CharG@@ foY SeYViee - Aeeid@ni161. A. Basic Individual Aeaidentinl unit rate utilizing curb service and individual payment. 1. Maximum monthly rate $11.40 per service. 2. Maximum monthly rate differential for service north of Banyan Street $0.70 per aervi ce. 3. Naximum monthly rate for senior citizen $6.90. a. Senior citizen shall be anyone sixty-two (62) years old, head of household, and have a request with permittee. B. Hu ltiple Residential Unit rate utilizing curb service and group payment. 1. Maximum monthly rata shall be $11.40 for the first unit and $1C. 1C for each unit therenfter. 2. Maximum monthly rate differential for ecru ice north of Banyan $0.70 per unit. C. Multiple Resident lal Unit rate utilizing three (3) cub LC yard refuse containers. ~~ D Reno lution No. 89 ~~ Page 2 1. Maximum monthly Yate shall be eB Eollows in respect to frequency of service. a. one service weekly $ 67.50 b. Two services weekly $104.25 c. Three services weekly $141.00 d. Four services weekly $177.75 e. Pive servioee weekly $214.50 E. 81x services weekly $251.00 D. Temporary eery ice (lase than thicty (30) days). 1. Three (3) cubic yard containers. a. Maximum rate of $54.75 for sewn (7) days at a location. D. Maximum rate of $33.50 for each additional service (dump). 2. Roll off container up to maximum forth (40) cubic yards. a. Maximum rote of $233.00 per service (dump), however, container shall be serviced (dumped) at least once every seven (7) days. SECTION 2: Ohergee for Service - Commetclal/InduetrLal. A. commerctal and Industrial rate ut it izing one and one half (1-1/2) cubic yard refuse containers: 3. Maximum monthly rate shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service. Vn-compacted compacted a. one service weekly $ 56.00 $ 83.75 b. Two services weekly $ 81.75 $122,25 c. Three services Weekly $107.50 $161.00 Monthly rates iv respect tv fraquavcy aaall vot De leas than 856 of the atnted mnxSmum rnte. e. Commercial and Industrial race utilizing two (2) cubic yard refuse cgntalnere: 1. Maximum monthly race shall be ae follows In respect to frequency of service. V ~ L Resolution No. 89 ~~ Page 3 Un-compacted Compacted a. One eery ice weekly $ 62.50 $ 93.75 b. Two eervicee weekly $ 94.50 5142.25 c. Three 9ervice9 weekly $126.75 5191.00 Monthly rotas in reapeet to frequen cy sball not ha leas than 858 of the ateted auxLum urvica. C. Commercial and Industrial rate util izing three (3) cubic yard refuse containers: 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service. Un-compacted Compacted a. One service weekly $ 74.75 5112.00 b. Two setvicee weekly $115.00 $172.50 c. Three services weekly $155.25 $269.00 d. Four services weekly $195.50 $329.75 e. Five services weekly $235.75 $390.25 f. Slx aerv lcea weekly $276.00 $45D.75 Monthly rotas in reapeet to frequency spell not be lees Lhaa 856 of the stated atex iatue rate. D. Commercial and Industrial rate util izing four (4) c ubic yard refuse containers: 1. Haximum monthly rate shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service. Un-compacted Compacted a. One service weekly 5 87.50 5131.50 b. Two services weekly $137.75 $206.75 c. Three aerv ices weekly $188, D0 5262.00 d. Four services weekly $236.25 5357.50 e. Five eervicee weekly $288.50 $432.75 .. „ia services weekly $]]6.75 $5..,,. ,.~ Moathlp rete^ in respect to frequen cy shell not be less then 856 of the ateted uxi~u~ rate. E. Commercial and Industrial rate utLliziny six (6) c ubic yard re Euee containers: 1 Resolution No. 89-~5 Page 4 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service. Vn-compact ed Compacted a. one service weekly 5103.75 $156.00 b. Two services weekly $174.00 $eci.00 c. Three services weekly 5244.00 $365.75 d. Fvur services weekly $314.25 $470.75 e. Pive services weekly $384.50 $575.75 f. Slx eervicee weekly 5454.50 $680.75 Novthl} rotas is respect to frequmcp shall not be less thaw 858 of the atatad uxLua, rats. F. Food handling and food processing ae defined by Chapter 8.18 (counter-balanced lid), utilizing three (3) cubic yard containers: 1. Maximum monthly rata shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service. Vn-compacted Compacted a. Two eervicee weakly $131.50 5172.50 b. Three eervicee weekly 5171.50 $233.00 c. Pnur eervicee u~ekly $211.25 $293.50 d. Five eervicee weekly $251.00 5354.25 e. Six Services weekly 5291.00 5414.75 Mavth lp rates in respect to frequency shell sot De lass than 858 of the stated eexia,u rste. G. Roll off container up to maximuF forth (40) cu'o is yards. un-compacted Compacted a. Per service (dump) $251.OC $376.00 Container shall be serviced (dumped) at least four (4) times per month. Ra l.w in respwt tv f}aquevcy shell vak be les• khav 85t of the stated aexi~a~ rates. N. Temporary etrvice (lase than thirty (30) days). 1. Three (3) cubic yerd contains re. e. Max imam rate of $54.75 for seven (7) days at location. 8~ G Resolution No. 89 ~~ Page 5 b. Maximum rate of $33.50 for each additional service (dump>• Rata in respect to frequency shall not be leas Lbav 851 of the stated uzieue rata. 2. Aoll otf container up to maximum forth (40) cubic yards. a. Maximum sate ct $251.00 per service (dump), however, container shell be eerviced (dumped) at least once every seven (7) daye. Rats iv respect to frequency shall sot be leas thaw 65t of the stated eazLue rates. u~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 To: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Assocl ate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Envirormnental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Arrow Route N1dening, from east of Hermosa Avenue at Center Avenue to Haven Avenue ~ECOMMENDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the En virormental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Arrow Route Nldening Protect, frw east of Hermosa Avenue at Center Avenue to Haven Avenue. This report presents an Enviromnental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Arrow Route Improvement Project from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue, for City Council approval and 15suance of a Negative Declaration. rn r~ns~..,,anro sr~, tye r.ltf„~„i. crpi.~,,..gnt.l n~~.lvr~ ec. .,,~ c.,+,. Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to permit construction of the street widening improvement. These improvements generally entail the widening of Arrow Route within the existing right-of-way and as provided by voluntary dedication or purchase of public rights-of-way. Included with this prof ect will be a traffic signal at the Intersection of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue. It is the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed pro,~ect is in conformance with the proposed development of Arrow Route as a ma,~or arterial street will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and, therefore, recommend that these improvements be classified as a Negative Declaration. Res 411 submitted, ~. ..- A~F:dtM-a~~ Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 89'33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROY ING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED ARRON ROUTE NI DENIN6 DROJECT NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Arrow Route Nldening; and NHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and NNEREAS, an Environaental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves a nv ronmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Arrow Route Midening, east of Nermosa Avenue from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Determina on pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 1-' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STiJDY -PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must ee completed and suomitted to the Development Review Committee through :he department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the 7lann ing Division staff sill prepare Part [I of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no siggnificant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will 6e filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report wilt be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: June 14. 1989 Project Title: ARROW ROUTE NIDEN ING Applicant's Name, Address, Telephonexity of Rancho Cucamonna. P.U. Box 807. Rancho Cucamonoa, CA 91730 (714) 989-1862 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer Location of 7roj ect: Arrow Route east of Hermosa from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue Assessor's Parcel List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies o~~~ the agency issLing such permits: City construction and roaU closure permits ~7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: Widen Arrow Route to obtain a functional major roadway section with 4 lanes for travel and a two-way left turn lane. Install a traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Arrow Route Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: Pro iect area ! 3 acres Describe the environmental settin of the project site including information on topography, soi st abi ty, p ants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The project site is a relatively level location that drains to the south. Parcels north wes terly of the Arrow Route project are fully developed'- ~pjrtment complexes The parcel north easterly of Arrow Route is untended vineyards. The area south of Arrow Route atone the entire protect is a vacated golf course, used for grazing. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a serf es of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whale have significant environmental impact NO ~~ WILL TRiS PROJECT: YES "!0 1. Create a substantial rhange in ground contours? _ % 2. create a substantial change in existing noise of produce viora ti on or glare? ~ K 3. „reate a substantial change in demand for municipal services ;police, fi re, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X d. Create changes in th e exist ing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ R S. ~4emove any existing trees? 4ow many?~_ ~ _ 6. Crea".e the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammab les or =_xp los fives? _ ~L Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): in order 'to complete the street widening, the seven evergreen trees will have to 7. Estimate the amount of sewaq ~A nd solid waste materials this project will generate daily: N 8, Estimate the num NSA of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: N/A 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the nett page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct Co the best of my knowledge and b2tiaf. further u.^.derstand !hat addi+.ional informat;on may be rPqulrPd eo be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be~ade by the Planning Division. ~~ ~ ~. Date: i> Signa re - ~ ~ "-'~~- q title -'~ I-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school dfstr!ct for accommedat ing the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL I. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: _ 6 F>rlSnch HafP of occupancy: _ Model/ and M of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range 9~ I-4 CSTY OP gANCAO CUCA>40NGA PART IS - INISIAL ST:'DY ENVIRO:.^.~NTAL CNECtS.IST DATE; June lA, 1989 nPP*_ICSC: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA FILI::O DA?E: LOG NV!®EA: PAOSECT: Arrow Route Widening PROJECT tOGT2ON: Fast of Hermosa Avenue from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue I. E`II'S RO~'?ffVTAL INPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe° ansvtrs art rtqulrad on attached sheets). YES ltAYSE NO 1. Soils and Geolo av. Will cht proposal havt signiclcanc rtsules Ln: a. Cnscabla gsourd conditions er in changts !n geolag is nladoeahips? b. Dis rupcions, displacmtnts, torpor don or c• Changt Sn topography er ground surfatt CanCOYr SnctNals2 d. Tht dtscruc tion, covtring ar modificldon of any uniqut itologie or 9hyaieal fearurta? e, My poctncial inertast in wind or vactr nos ion of toils, offtcting ticMr an or off t1t• eandlcons' f. Ctunps in erns lon sileaeion, or daposieion? g. Exposure of people or piooarcy ca geplo gic hazy rds such as urchquakta, landalldts, mud- slldts, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increaat Sn cht rau of sxeratelon and/or ua of any minnal resouru? 2. N.ydrelaev. Wlll ch• proposal havt aigniflcane r tsu: r9 in: x ~~ ~~ e ~ X _ X _ __ .1L x •~_ - YES wAY3_ i. Changes Sn currants, or eh• course of direc[Son of flowing screams, rivers, or ephenaral scream channels? _ % b. Changes Sm absor9 cion rata, drainage paccarns, or ch• race and amount of aurfac• vacar t. Al caraclonf to cha couca• or floe of flood vacars? ~ ~_ R d. Change in cha amount of surf ate vacar in any body of vacar? ~_ X e. Discharge Snco surface vacars, or any alcaracian of surface vacar quality? _ X f. Alcaracdon of groundvacar charge tarisciee? _` X g. Change Sn the quanci cy of greundvacara, •iehar through diraec addle ions or vich- dravala, or through incarfarenc• with an aquitar? Quality? Quantity? __ X h. The reduction !n cha amount of vatar ochar- vis• svailabla Eor public vacar suppliae? X 1. Expo aura of poop la or proparey co vacar rela cad hazards such as Hooding or aeiehes? _ K 3. Air Quallcy. Will the proposal nave siiµ,:i:....,; raaulca in: a. Cons cant or Datiodic air amiss ions troa mobile or indicate sourtaa? ~ ~ _ X Stationary aoureu2 ,~ ,~ b. Dacariorac ion o[ scab cant air gaol icy and/or Sadrtaruam with eha atcalnmanc o[ applieab l• sit quality •ttndards? _ ~ c. ISteratlon of Local or re{Sonal climatic eondieiorts, at[accing air movaman t, moss cure or tampara turn? _ X 4. Biou FI__ra. will eha proposal have s1{ni[icanc maul ca in: a. Chan ga Sn ch• ch stae ca riscics of apacla, lncluC ln; diversity, dig ctibucton, or number of any spat iaa oj~~-p11}l-ana? ~ _~_ R b. Red ucc ioa of eh• n mbars of any unique, ra ea or and anga red spaelas mE planes'. _ ~_ R c. Introduction of nw or dlarupcive apse its of plants into an area? d. Rsducclon la cha potential for agricultural produc clon? teens. W311 the proposal have signif Scant reeul cs Ln: a. Chang• in the charac uristlo aE specias, Snel uding dlvaralty, distribution, or numbers of any specias of animals? b. Raductlon a! eha numbers of any unigw, rata or andanprad sp¢caa of animals? ~. Incrodutcion o[ nw ar diazupclve species oC animals in co an •ru, or result Sn a barrier co the migration or movement o[ animals? d. DacerSOUC1on or removal of existing Eish or vildlif• hablcac? 5. Pooul anon. WS11 the proposal have aigniflcsnt resuics 1n: a. Will the proposal altar cha location, diatri- buclon, density, dlvarsiey, or gtouch rat• of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal atCect existing bowing, or create a demand far additional howieg? 6. Socio-Economic Fae rots. WSll the piepasal have signif icanc results is: a. Change is Iocal or regional aeeio-eeonomlc charecuriaties, Lneiuding mcono~ie or coemartlal divauicy, tax tau, and property value? b. Yill pro~acc eomts b• equftaD ly distributed arang pro~aet banaticlarlu, L.a., buYau, tax payers oe peolaet amass? 7. Land Va• and Planning Cam tderactons. will cha proposal -haven signif icane caul ca in? a. A aubecantlal al eeracion of the Dresant or of inn:d sand use of an area? b. A conEliet vlth any deeignac Iona, ob~ee civea, polic lea, or adopted plena o[ any govarnmantal encl:Sea? c. M iapacc upon cha qula Sty or quantity at ex Sscing consu:pciva or non-conaumpciv reeeucional opporcunlcles? . 93 . ~ - __ Y _ ~ X - X X X X __ ~ _ ~." '~i 8. Trananoreaclon. 4111 the yroD~aal have algnif Scant reaul ce in: a. Gneraclon of auDStanclal addi[lonal vshlcular movamenc? X S. Ef facts on exia[1ng atree b, of damand Car nev ftnR Conacructlon? ~ ~ c. Effae o nn existing pazking Cac Slf cSaa, or damand fos nav parking? X d. Subaeanciai Smpacc upon existing transporta- tion ayes uma? g a. Alterations ce present pactsrna of circula- eion or movemanc of peoyla and/o: goods? X _ f. Alterations co or aflecta an prefant and pocaatial va ear-DOrne, nil, mesas transit ar a1r craf tic' g g. Incrusq !n traffic hazards co mo cor vthiclea, DScyclista or pedu eriana7 X 9. Cultural Raaourc aa. 4111 ehs yrapoaal have significane ruulea !n: a. Adis curDance co the integrity of archaw logical, palaoncologiul, and/or hies torlcal ruourtes? _ ~ 10. Neal th. Safety. and Nuisance Faecors. 4111 eha proposal Dav. s1gn1lieant results in: a. Crution o[ any hu1tA Msatd or potential hulch hazard? X b. Expaaura of paopla eo pocantfal haalch hazards? _ ~ c. A iYsk of axploaicn er nlnsa of hasardoua au-atanua in the avant of as act idanc? ~ __ ~ d. b ineruaa in the numb ar mt individuals or spgelas of vaccor or pachenogan it organisms or the exposures of poop la to such o rganiama? _ _~ % a. Inc raaaa in existing no isa lavals? X f. Exyoaure of people to potentially dangerou^ n0lsf 1lVels? B• The creation of oDJacclonaDle odors? _ ~ h. M incruse In light or glare? X ^~ ~_ Y°_i Y4!'3L tiC 11. Aaa cheelca. WSll the proposal have algnlf Stan[ rasulca in: a. '[he obstruction or dsgradacion of any ac soft vista or viw? X b. Tha czaaclon of an aaa chaclcally off anaiva a1 u? __ ~ e. A confllec vlth the obi ac clva of daadgnaced or potm clal stand[ corrldora? g ... tlc1i 1t1ea and PrD ilc Sarvicaa. Wdii the proposal have a algnititanc nand for nw systems, or alcettclona co the lollwl¢g: a. Electric pwar? X b. Natural or paekagad gas'. X c. Co®unitaciona syseama? x d. Water supply? ~ X e. WaatevaCJr fac111tUa? _ X f. Flood control acruecusu? _ x g. So Lid vuu Eaeilicias? _ X h. Firs protect Son? _ X i. iuii~~ pm eau ias,: ~ v ~ _ ~. Schaola? X k. Parks or otMr raeraacional Sae lliciea? _ X 1. Maincenanem a! public tatilltiee, including roads and flood control [ae111clea? _ ~ s. OcMr govasoNnul sarvieu? _ jL 17. lnar at-and Searu Ra aoureu . Will the proposal Aare algn iL icanc ruults 1n: a. ~1ae of sub Bran rlal oz exe ¢aalve fuel or energy? _ ~ X b. iubaranclal incre aaa Sn duand upon ex lacing ^ou resa of energy? _ ~ c. M increase Sn the demand toe developmanc o! nev sources oL e$~e ' _ ~ d. M increase or p(rp~acion of the con aumpcion o[ non-ranwab le [o ma of energy, Shen [uaihle rsnwable wurees o! energy are ava11a61e? _ % >.., 5 YES ;a'!3° `.C e. Subs cant Sal depletion of any nanreneva6le or scarce natural resource? ~ 14. !7sndacorv Ffndin¢a of ES¢ni.'SCance. a, Does ch• proj act have [F.• pouneial to degrade cha gwll cy of th• envlrc~anc, aube uncially reduce cha habieac of Eiah or vildlif• apac lea, cause a flah or vildl i[• popula clon co drop b elov calf euftaining Lvds, threaten co elivlnate a plant or animal coaaeuni cy, reduce the numbs os restrict the cane of • rare or endangered plant or animal or allnlnac• important eaamplea o[ cha major periods o! California history or Drehiscory? _ ~ b. Does the prof eet have the po[antial ca achieve ahorc-care, co cha disadvantage of long-term, environmancal gosh? (A chart-care impact on the environment is one which occurs is a relatively brief, def inlcive Derlod o[ circa vh11a loag- cerm Smpaeta will endure wall in eo cha future). _ _~ ,(, c. Does cha prof act have fmpu to vh!.eh era ind lvidually limited, Dut cmulstively <onsiderabla? (Cumulatively consideubla mum chat the lneramancal eifecu of an individual proj ace an consideeabla when viewed Sn connection with eha •ffaees of past prof ecca. and probab l• Eucun proj ecta). d. Does eha prof act have anvironmsntal dfscca which uill cause subecanclal adverse affects on human beings, either directly or ind irsccly? ~ II. DIS C;;SSION OF ENlZA0N14:ITAL lVALVASION (S.a.. of off irmacly ansvara co cha above Quea [ions plw a dlseunion of proposed mitigation musurea), T ~_: II:. DET_.L`!IBATIC:1 Dn :he bash of this Sniclal evaluaeion: ~ i I find tha Dravosad pro~ecc CODL~ `i0T have a aignif icanc eEf etc ~ an cha anvlronman c, and a h'EGATIYE DECWtATIDA will 6a prayared. I find chat although she proposed pro]ecc could have •aignif icanc j XX of fecc on cha anvironmmc, chars will cot 6• a significant ei fee: - in this cao bacauas tha mitigation maasuraa du crib ed an an ac Cached shaac haw bon added ea cha pra]eec. A eEGATI7E DECLUUTZDY (JILL HE PREPARED. ~ I fled chs propoaad prof act NAY have a aignif icanc •E £acc on the anvir:~ane, and an EWTAGB:fE:7T L`iPAGT REPORT is required. Date ~ .Z ,' _ n cure ` ~~ ~~~~~ if cT-`-7-- ~7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ARRON ROUTE NIDENING 6b. Project is to be funded by City Systems fees collected from developers. 8a,d,e. The improved road conditions proposed for Arrow Route, may result in additional vehicular movemen*s. / V - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate C1v11 Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Envtronmental Assessment and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Area V Hillside Road Storm Drain, Phase II from Archibald Avenue to the Upper Alta Lana Channel i It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Area V Hillside Road Storm Drain Protect, Phase II from grchibald Avenue to the Upper Alta Lama Channel. BACKiROUMD/AWLLYSIS: This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Phase II of the Area V Hillside Road Storm Drain Improvement Protect for City Council approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. In conformance with the California Envirormmental Ouallty Act and State Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to permit construction of the storm drain improvement. These improvements generally entail the installatiion of a storm drain within the existing right-of-way. It is the Engineering staff's finding Lhat the proposed project 1s in conformance with the proposed development of Hillside Road as a collector street will not create a significant adverse impact on the en virorment and, therefore, recomaend that these improvements be classified as a Negative Declaration. Resp~etf ly tted, ~ ~ .~ RHM:JLM: pam Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~g- ~.J--~ r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED AREA V HILLSIDE ROAD STORM DRAIN PROJECT, PHASE II NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Hillside Road Storm Drain, Phase tt; and NHEREAS, said fmprovemenis require an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves a nv ronmentat Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Area V Hillside Road Storm Dratn, Phase II. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is dtrected to file a Notice of Determi na o~E~ n pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. / Q ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL Far all protects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Canmlttee through the department where the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part tI of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determtnatlons: (1) The protect will have no stggnif scant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The protect will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental impact Report w111 be prepared, ar (3) An additional Information reDOrt should be supDlted by the applicant giving further lnformat7an concerning the proDased protect. Date Filed: dune 14, 1989 Protect Title: Hillside Road Area V Storm Drain, Phase II Appitcan is Name, Address, telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.U. Box 8U1, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 (714) 989-1862 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To, 8e Contact Concerning this Frot Kt: Mike Ul ivier, Sr. Civi Engineer Location of Protect: Hillside Road between Archibald Avenue and the Upper Alta Loma Storm Orain Assessor's Parse} Np.: N/A List other permits necessary from total, regfonai, state and federal agencies and the agency 1ssuing such permits: City construction permit and road c uicp re permit, County of San Bernardino Flood Control Encroachment Permit. lot PROJECT DESCRIPTION proposed use or proposed prof ect• install 66" RCP storm drain as per Lhe City Storm Drain Master Plan in Hiilside koad between Archibald Avenue and Upper Alta Loma Channel Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if nny: Project area ! 1.5 acres Describe the environmental setting of the pro~ect site Including information on topography, so sta ty, pants (trees land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The Hillside Road Storm Drain Pro.iect is situated in the north oortion of tF i Hi~lc'1 Rnad dra inc Hatt rlv from Arr hi ha ld Aveme Tha land su rround ina the pro iect site is residentially zoned. The new storm drain will join the existing flood control channel east of Archibald Avenue. :; the prdjett part of a larger proJett, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant en viranmental impact No. 10~ NiLL THIS PROJECT: VES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contourst _ ~ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? ~ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (pollee, fire, water, sewage, eic.)1 _ ~ 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning ar General Plan designattons7 _ ~ 5. Remove any existing trees? Haw many7_ _ ~ 6. Lreate the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? _ % Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 1. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this orofect will generate daily: Nig 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this pro,iect: ryiq 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: 6 10. If the pro,Iect Involves the construction of residential units, conplete the form on the next page. CERTIFIGTION: t hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhtblts present the data and information required for this Initial evaluation to the hest o7 my ability, and that the facts, statement;, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can p by the Planning Division. Date: "~? ,fSG Signet "= ---f' ~-- ~'-'' /03 Tit 1e ~--~-ir ~~ RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are re0u fired to secure letters from the School district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to Issuance o1 building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of singie family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model/ and 1 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Ranee / O CI :".' OF RA::C;?0 C~'C ~.MD`~GA PART TI - L:;::AL 5"~`.' ESt'IdC ::?r:;inL C2EC;i:.:5' cATE: June 14, 1989 ~'?LS C.;:-: CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMONGA __:.,,, ,,,_ tcc a~Ee: ?2c]EC-: Hillside Road Area V Storm Drain, Phase II ?eorEC: LocATiCS: Archibald Avenue to the Upper Alta Loma Storm Drain (Exo La mac icn of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on a[cech ed sheets). 1. co i'_s and Geo Lo zv. Will the prep osal have s: ga:: .,a.-,r resoles in: a. L'nscab :e grcurd tend is ions or ir. changes in er c,i. :...... _.,.,.,. lr,. b. Dis rupClo ns, displacements, comp ac cion or 5uriai of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface cmncour in cereals? d. The destruction, cover ing or modifl cation of any unique geol<gic ar physical features? e. Any pocemtlal increase in wind or water eiosion of soils, affecting either on or oEE site condl cons' .. Chanvea g. Exoosu re of people or property Co geologic hazards such as earchq wake s, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or sLmllar hazards? h. An Snc cease !n the race of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. Hvd~e lozv. Vill the proposal have sign if lean[ results in: / Q fES °4~"E VO n X X _ z X X X Faga ~ YES u4Y3E :;0 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of (loving streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? X 6. Changes Sn ab sorp ciao ra [es, drainage pat:erns, oz the rate and amount of surface va ter runoit? X c. Al ce ra bons to the course or Flov of Flood eaters? K d. Change 1n the amount of surface vacer in anv ~ body of eater? g e. Discharge into surface eaters, or any alteration of surface vacer quality? x -. Alterac ion of groundva ter characcezistlcs? g g. Change Sn the quantity of groundvaters, etcher through direct additions or vich- dravals, or through Sn cerfer¢nce etch an aquifer? Quali cy? Quantity? ,_ ~ h. The reduction in the amount of vacer ocher- vise avai Sable for public vacer supplies? i. Exposure of people oz property co vacer related hazards such as Flooding or <oi c!;cc^ ~ d. Air Qualf ey. Will the proposal have significant res oles in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile ar ind Stec[ sources? ~ 5ca[Sonary sources? __ ~ b. Decerlotatian of ambient air quail cy and/or interference vlth [he aCtainment of applicable air quality standards? _ _V ~ c, Altera tidn of local or regional climat lc conditions, af.'eccing air movement, moss cure ar temps ra cure? __ ~ ti. 91ota Flora. Will the proposal have slgnlf scant results fa: a. Change in she characterisciea of species, inelud ing diversity, distribution, or number of any species of planes?~~/ __ Y b. Reduc[SOn of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ~ ~ x c. Incroduceion of nev or dlsrup Give soec!es of planes into an area? % d. Reduction Ln the potential for agrltul:oral produc ciao? % raur.a. will the proposal have signif icanc results ir.: a. Change in the characceris tics of species, including divers icy, discribu c'_on, oz nu.-,bers of any species of animals? b. Reduce loo of the nu=hers of any unique, rat. or endangered species of animals? % c. Incroduceion of nev or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier co the nigco tion or movement of animals? % d. Oecerio ration or removal of existing fish ar wildlife hob Stet? ~ 5. Poouiat ion. will the proposal have significant resuits in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, discri- bucion, density, diversity, oz grow ch rate of [he :,ran population of an area? ~ b. Wi11 the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ~ 6. Socio-Ec onouic Fac co rs. 1J111 the proposal have signiiicant results in: a. Change in Iocal or regional soclo-economic charac:eris tics, including economic or commercial diversity, [ax rate, and property values? % b. Will prol ect costs be equfta6ly diseribu ted among proj etc beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? % _ 7. Land L'se and Plannin¢ Considerarlons. Will the pw pa sal have stgmficanc resuits en? a. A subs cane Sal alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? % h. A conf lice with any designations, abj etc Ives, policies, or adopted plans of any governaencal eneieies? / 7 O % c. M impact upon ch! q u laY ty or quan city of existing coneumpcive or non-consumptive retreat tonal opportunities? % . age ~'rS `~Y3° NO 8. Ttansnorcat ion. Jill the proposal have signif icanc resui [s in: a. Cenerat ion of substantial additional vehicular movement? X S. Ef feccs on exis[Sng streets, or demand for new scree[ construction? X c. Effects on existing parking facill Gies, or demand for new perking? X d. Subscan cial Impact upon existing transporca- [ion systems? X e. Altera clr,;s to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? X f. AL[era[ions to or effects on prey ens and potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air Graff ic? g. Increases Sn traffic hazards to mo cor vehicles, bicycl iscs or pedestrians? X 9. Cultural Resources. Jill the proposal have sig nif icanc results Sn: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? X 10. Hea l[h, Safecv, and Nuisance Factors, Jill the pzo posa! have signif icanc resui cs in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ~- ~ b. Exposure of people co pocenclal health hazards? ~ c. A risk of exploa ion or release of hazardous substancna in the even[ of an accldsnt? ~ d. M increase Sn [he number of Snd iv Sduals or speclxs of vet cor or pathenogen lc organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? _- ~ e. Increase in exls[Sng noise levels? __ ~ f. Expoaure of people co potenelally dangerous noise levels? O ~ ~ ~ g. The creation of ob ecti able odors? ~ Y h. M increase in light or glare? Y ?sae > ll. Aes the[ics. X111 the proposal have sSgnlfltanc results in: a. :'he obstruction or degrada clan of any scenic vista or view? ~ b. :'he creation of zn aes checically offensive site? ~ c. A coni Lct with tha ohjec Give of designated or potential scenic corrldo rs? ~ 1=. ^t Slitle5 and Public Services. X111 the proposal hav e a signif icanc need foc new systems, or alt erations c: -he fallowing: a. Electric power? ~ b. natural or packaged gas? ~ c. Communications systems? ~ d. Rater supply? Y e. Wastewater fat illtiea? X F. Fl oad control structures? X g. Solid was ce facilities? v h. Fire pratectlon? x 1. Police pro sect ion? Y j. Schools? % k. Parks or ocher recreational Eacili cl es? X 1. Ha inrenan<e of public facilities, including roads and Flood control fat S11t1ea? X m. Ocher governmental services? 13. Ener¢c and Scarce Resou rcea. 4111 the proposal iia ve sign ii ccanc results in: a. L'se of sub st ancial or excess Ste fuel or energy? X b. Subscan[Sal increase In demand upon existing sources of energy? % c. M Increase Ln the demand [or development of new sources of energy?/O ^J ~ d. M increase or perperuac Son of ehe consumption of non-renewable forma of energy, when feas Sble renewable aourtea of energy ace avail ab lei ~ ~ ?axe 5 Y°_5 )aY9~ VO e. Substantial depletion of any mm~tenewa6le or scarce nacnral resource? X 14. ~a^.datorv F~ndinxs of SS¢i'Olca a. Does the praj ect have the potential to degrade the quality of the env iranmen t, subscancially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildl ifs population co drop below self auscaining levels, threaten to eliaina to a plan[ or animal community, reduce the number or ras[zicc the range o£ a raze or endangered plan[ or aniaal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Callfo rnia history or prehistory? k 6. Does [he project have the potential to achleve short-tens, ro the disadvantage of long-ce m. envitonmen cal goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs Sn a zela cively brief, definitive period of came while long- term impacts will endure yell into the future). X c. Does the proj etc have impacts which are individually liaiced, but cuaulatively considerable? (Cunula[ively considerable means chat the lnezemencal effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed fn connection with the effects o£ pas[ projects, ana probao le tutors projects). ~ d. Does the project have anvizonmental effects which will cause subs cantial adverse of fects on human beings, either dlrec[ly or Indirectly? ~ II. DISCCSSIOA OF Ey. PIQOV>LS^!'AL EYALUA?I0~ (i. e., of off iz-.a Give answers co the above questions plus a discussion of proposed cicigac ion measures). 1 l O Pa¢e III. DE?E4YZSA:IDV On the basis of this lnltial evaluation: ~ I find [he proposed project COL"U VOI have a sign'_i'_:.ant ef:ecc on the environmen c, and a \2CAZICE DECI.:R.1?IOY will be prepared. _ I fin3 that although the proposed project could have a significant XX effect on the environment, there will not De a significant of fec: in this case because the aicigacion measures described on an ac [ached sheet have been added ca the project. A \EGATI'.T_ DEC:,.:RAT?D:i ::ILL of PREPARED. r i I find the proposed project u4Y have a signi°lcanc effect on the ~_ environment, and an E\TIRD\^ffAi IIII+ACT REPORT is required. ~ '~ `~ u: e C [~~ ~~P~ ire -T ENVIRONIENTAL IMPACT HILLSIDE ROAD AREA V STORM DRAIN, PHASE Ii 2a,b,c. The existing surface street flours will be diverted to the subterranean stem drain. 6b. Protect funds received from Citywide Store Drain fees. 12f. A Junction structure to Join the new H111sfde Ston Drain to the Upper Alta lama Channel is Included as part of this Job. 121. The City will have to provide maintenance for the new storm drain. II~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Envirormrental Assessment and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Amethyst Avenue Storm Drain and Street Reconstruction frma 19th Street to Highland Avenue RECOMIEIDATIOM• It is recommended tha. the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Amethyst Avenue Storm Drain and Street Reconstruction from 19th Street to Hlghiand Avenue. This report presents an Environmental Assessment Inltlai Study for the proposed Amethyst Avenue Storm Drain and Street Reconstruction from 19th Street to Highland Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental fhulity arr anw cr,ro Guidelines, the attached documents have been prcparcd to permit construction of the storm drain improvement. These improvements generally entail the Installation of a 48" storm drain under the existing road bed or within drainage easements as provided by voluntary dedication, and the reconstruction of the existing pavement section. It 1s the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed proiett is to conformance with the proposed development of Amethyst Avenue as a collector street will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and, therefore, recommend that these improvements be classified as a Negative Declaration. Resp su ;ted, ~ i , ~ ~T ~ ''. / ----- RHM:JLM:pam Attachment ll3 RESOLUTION N0. (~ q- ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEDATIYE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED AMETHYST AVENUE STORM GRAIN AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION NHEREAS, the City Councfl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Amettgst Avenue Stone Drain and Street Reconstruction; and NHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmentai Assessment; and kHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the Callfor^~a Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, dE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Hereby approves ~EnTnmental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Amethyst Avenue Stone Drain and Street Reconstruction. SECTION 2: The City Clerk 1s directed to file a Notice of DeternHna on pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. ll~ ENVIItONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION sENrRa. ~1T17AL STUDY -PART I For ali protects repairing environmental review, this form must be comp feted and submitted to the Oevelopment Review Committee through the deoartment where the protect appitcstlon fs made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part Ii of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Canmtsston. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no siggnificant environmental impact and a Negatlw OeclaraLton will ba filed, (2) The Drotect will haw a significant anvlronsNntal lapaet and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared. or (3) M addllional information reDOrt should De supplied by the applicant giving further infonaatton concerning the proposed protect. Date Filed: June 13, 1989 Protect Title: Amethyst Avenue Storm Drain and ,Street Reconstruction ADDIiCant's Marne, Address, Telephone: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga. P 0 Box 801 Rancho fi~ramonaa CA 91730 (714) 989-1862 Marne, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Loncerning this Protect: John L. Martin Location of Protect: Amethyst Avenue north of 19th Street to Highland Avenue Assessor's Paree} No.: N/A list other permits necessary tram local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: construction oermit and road closure permit from Ctty PRO,]ECi DEStRtPTION Proposed use or proposed project: construct storm drain system eztendina from north of 19th Street to Highland Avenue and reconstruct structural section of P,me thyst Avenue Acreage of project area and sguare footage of existing and proposed buildings. if any: Pro.iected area . 2 acres Describe the environmental setttna of the project site including information on topography, so st y, pplants (tree land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic asDKts, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach natesssry sheets): The project is situated in an area that slopes to the south. There ~s an earthen swale at the east right-of-way which drains into a patch of berry vines. The berry vine will be removed to install the storm drain. The storm bra in will then traverse an easement through an asphalt covered parking lot YVY 1- ILV YII :~++~plliannet nn toth crreat „a,+ of Amethv~* Avenue Is the project part of a iarger projeeL, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact NO MILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ~ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _ ~ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, ett.)I _ ~_ 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designationsl _ ~ 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ ~ 6. Create the need far use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, ftammables or explosives? x Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): Eliminate existing natural drainage Swale across private property. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and so11d waste materials this protect will generate dally: N/A 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated dally by this protect: N!A 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and f1111ng) required for this protect, to cub 1C yards: 1000 C.Y. 10. If the protect lnvoives the construction of residential units, eoslglete the form on the nett page. CERTIFIGTION: [ hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information mey be required to De submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made Dy the Planning Oivfsion. oate: ~ 117 Signatur s.~•<-<- _~_ _ -i Title .-, ~` R~SIOENTiAL CONSTRUCTION The following tnfarmatton should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planninq Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accanmodate the proposed residential development. Developers are reouired to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of :logic family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: M 3. Date proposed to Degtn construetton: _ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model/ and / of Tentative S. 8 roams Price Ranee //~ CI:^: OF RA\CHO CL'C;.YO\GA 2aRT II - I?7IZIaL Si.'DY EAVIZ0:7)_::iAi C9EC::LISi DATE: June 13, 1989 ?? IC:.:-: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAf10NGA C _,._ :G GA:°_: LOG ;7U:IDER: p=,o:Er: Amethyst Street Storm Drain and Street Recon~tru lion P^.o:=C: LCCa:IO~: North of 19th Street to Ntahland Avenue Z. E`SPC^R"TAL I>19ACTS (Exp laracion of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required an aceached sheets). YES P_4Y?P SO 1. Eo 1Is and Geoloac. Gill the proposal ha~.. si ynif icanc rnaul cs in: a. Cnscab le ground conditions or in changes Sn geologic relac3onships? % b. Oisrupciors, displacements, compaction ar burial of the soil? % c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? % d. The descruc[fon, covering or modification of any unique geolo g!c or physical fea[uzna? e. any potential increase in wind or water erosion of ant 19, affecting etcher on c: off si ce candi tans? % f. Changes Sn erosion sil[a [So n, ar deposition? ~ _ g. Exposure of peon le or property to geo to git hazards such as ear c.",quakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ ~ h. an Snc tease Sn the race of exeraeelon and/or use of any mineral resource? // _ ~ 2. Nvd ro lo¢v. Rill the proposal have elgnlf itant resin cs in; YES `L4Y9E ::0 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or epheaeral scream channels? b. Changes in absorption races, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Al ceracions co the course or flaw of flood va cars? , d. Change in the amount of sutface eater in anv body of water? e. -ischa: ge into surface eaters, or any alteration of surface vacer quality? f. Alcetatlon of groundwater characterls tics? g. Change in [he quan CSty of gro•:ndvaters, either through direct addi cio~s or wlth- dravals, or through interference with an aquFFer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reducc ion in ehe amount of water other- vise available for public water supplies? 1. 'cxoosure of people oz property co water refaced hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Ouallcy. Hill the proposal have sfoni fi~vnr results in: a. Constant or periodic air amiss Sons from mobile o: indirect sources? Sca CSonary sources? 6. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or Snterference vleh the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alcera clon of 1oda1 or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or cevpe ra cure? 4. 91oca Flcra. Uill the proposal have significant results 1: : a. Change !n the characteristics of species, includ ing diversity, distr ibuclon, or number of any species of plenta? ~ ` O b. Reduction of tha numbers of any unique, rare or eadange red aDecies of plants? x x x ~_ ~ X x - Y x _ X X ~~ ~ ,- X c. Inctoducc ion of nev or dlsrup rive soecle5 of plants into an area? X d. Reduction !n the potential :or agr cultu zal produt t!on? X Fauna. ~i11 the proposal have significant resui :s ia: a. Change in the characteristics of species, includin; dlvezs ity, discrib ucion, or numbers of any species of animals? ~ 6. Reduct SOn of [he numbers of any unique, rata or endangered species of animals'. ~ c. Introdutt ion of nev or disruptive species of animals in co an area, or result in a barrier to the ^Sgratlon or movement of animals? ~ d. Deter SOraticn or reaoval of existing fish or wildlife habitat.' ~ 5. Povuiation. Uill [he proposal have significant resuits ir,: a. U111 the prooosal alter the location, distri- bution, dens icy, diversity, or grouch race of the human population of an area? ~ 6. wi'_1 the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand For additional housing? K o. aoc to-tconomfc Factors. Vill the proposal have sigr.tf icanc results in: a. Change Sn local or tegionai soclo-economic chazac:eris tics, including economic or comercial diversity, tax rate, and pzoperty values? X b. 8111 proj ec[ costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or proj etc users? ~_ 7. Land L'se and Plannin¢ Consideraclons. Dill [he proposal have signsf icanc resuits Ln? a. A substantial alce ra don of the present or planned land use of an area? X b. A conflict inch any designaclona, obj ec Gives, po llc Ses, or adop ced plans of any governmeneal entltlea? / ` ~ g c. M Smpact upon the qula icy or quantity of ex is [Sng consumptive oz non-consumptive retreaclonal oppo rcunitles? _ ~ .aze Yes `aY3v ;.0 g. ?zansoortatlon. Will the proposal have significant re9ui is in: a. Generaclan of subs cancial additional vehicular vovevenc'. % S. Ef feces on existing scree cs, or devard for nee street construction? ~ c. Effects on existing parking fat i'_i ties, or demand for neu parking? ~ d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion sys Gems? % e. Alterations [o pres env patterns of circuia- cion or movemnnt of people and/or goods? % f. Alteraciona to or effects on present and potential eater-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? ~ g. Increases Sn traffic hazards tv mo cor vehicles, b ityclis[s or pedestrians? % 9. Cultural Resources. W111 the proposal have s igniiicanc results in: a. Adis [urbance co the integrity of archaeological , paleontological, and/oz historical resources? ~ 10. Healih. Safeev, and Nuisance Factors. Will the pro posal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential heal ch hazard? % b. Exposure of peopln co potential health hazards? -_ ~ c. A risk of exp loaion ox ral ease of hazardous substances in the even[ of an accident? __ % d. M Sncreaee in the number of Sndividua la or species of vee cor or pathenogan is organises or the exposure of people to such organlams? % e. Increase Sn existing noise levels? __ % f. Exposure of people eo pocenclally dangerous noise levels? / ~~ _ ~ g. The creation of ableceionable odors? _ _~ ~ h. M increase in llghe ar glare? _ ~ :°S Y_44'3' v0 11. Aes checl cs. G111 the proposal have sigrlf Stan[ res ui cs in: a. ~e obscruc tion or degrada cSOn of any scenic vlsca or view? ~ b. `he czeae ion of an eeschecically offensive site? ~ ~ c. d confllcc with the objecelve of designated or poten tlal scenic corr!dors? ~ 12. Ue!lities and Pub llc Serrices. RSil the proposal hav e a signif itant need for new systems, of alt erations co [he following: a. El e<c zit power? b. t:a coral or packaged gas? ~ c. Communications systems? _ _ ~ d. Hater supply? Y e. pastewacer faciL•ties? ~ f. Fl oad control e[ruccures? ~ g. Solid vas ce facilities? ~ h. Fire prat eccion? X t. pn1S'_ ~ --.t..u... _~ j. Schools? ~ k. Parks oz other recreational facili cl es? X 1. Maintenance of public fat it !ties, including roads and flood control facilities? X m. OCher governmental services? ]L 13. En er¢v and Scarce Resources. Hill the proposal have sigh if icon[ tesu lcs in: a. Cse of soh stan[!al or excessive fuel or energy? ~ ~ b. Su6scanc ial increase in demand upon ex is cing sources a£ energy? ~ c. M increase in the demand for development of new eourcea of energy? ~ d. M Sncrease or perpetuation of the consumption of nom-renewable forma of energy, when feasible renewable sources o£ energy are available? X 1~3 - -- X132 ~ t'4S `;tySz `.0 e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce racuzal :esourcx? ~( 14. Yardacor: F!ndinas of S1¢nifiunce. a. Doxs the project have the pot en tlal co degrade the quality of the environcent, substancdal:y reduce the habitat of fish or vlldlifx species. cause a Eish or wildlife payola tion co dcop helve self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plane oz animal community, reduce the number <r zes tract the range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehis COry? 8 b. Does the project have the potential to a<hieve short-tern, co the disadvantage of long-ten, envlrowencal goals? (A short-term imps[[ on the environment !s one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of elms vhila long- cezm impacts will endure veil into chn future). Y c. Does the prof etc have impacts which are Sndividually linked, but cuaulatively cons idetable? (Cuaula[ively comiderable means that the incremental effects of an individual prof etc are considerable when viewed la connecrlon v1<a CAe eiiCC l! u. Ya~• r•`V °~~~• and probable future projects). Y d. Does the project have environmental efts[ cs which viii cause subscancial adverse effaces on human beings, either direcely or Sndirect'_y? ~, II. DISCS SION OF ESVIROalTMSTAL EVALVATIOl1 (f. e., of off lz-.stav e answers co the shove quea [ions plus a discussion of propoaad tit Sgacion measures). ~~~ -- - On the basis of this initial evaluaclon: ~ I find the proposed Droj etc COLD V02 have a significanc effete L_~ an the envi: muaenc, and a b'EGA::':c DECL:RAIZD~` will be prepared. _ I f_... that although the proposed project could have a significant i XX~ eifecc on the envirorvsent, there will not be a significant of fete ~- in this case because the of tiga clon veasures described on an attached sheet have been added co the proj ec c. A SEG.::IIT_ -EC'.:.f1.1iI0~` TILL BE PREPAlt=D. Z find the proposed proj ec[ Y4Y have a significanc effect an the ~_ envi:-~enc, and an EJTIROSxSi I)ffACi REPORT is required. ~ , ~- ' Dace /' acute ~~~ ENVIRCNMENfAL IMPACT AMETHYST AVENUE STCRM CRAIN AND STREET RECCNSTRUCTICN BETNEEN 19TH STREET AND HIGHLAND AVENUE lb,c,d. Reaavai of existing natural drainage Swale and grading of Swale area to nwtch existing adfacent contours lf. Concrete subterranean stone drain wi11 eli~lnate onslte erosion hazards presently experienced through natural drainage Swale. 2a,b,c. Flows through existing natural drainage Swale diverted to a subterranean stores drain. 6b. Pro,~ect funds received fro Citywide Storm Drain fees. /`d~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DgTE: July 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ~.r FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Nartin, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Environmental Assessment and Issuance of a Negative Decl aratton for the proposed Base line Road Ntdening, Phase II from Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving the Enviroraaental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed 0ase Line Road Widening Project, Phase II from Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue. BACK910UMD/ANALlfs15: This report presents an Environmental Assessment initial Study for the proposed Phase ii of the Base Line Road improvement Project for City Council approval and issuance oP a Negative Declaration. This 1s a follow-up review to the Negative Declaration issued for Phase I on March 2, 1988. In conformance wi to the Galtforeta Envi ronmintal Quality qct and State Guidelines, the attached documents have been prepared to penait construction of the street widening improvement. These improvements generally entail the widening of Base Line Road within the existing right-of-way and as provided by voluntary dedication or purchase of public rights-of-way. tt is the Engineering staff's finding that the proposed ~pro~ect 1s in conformance with the proposed development of Base Line Road as a major divided arterial street and a portion of an overall approved project in conformance with the General Plan will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment end, therefore, recommend that these Improvements be classified as a Negative Declaration. Respe ~y submitted, . i, RNtl:JLi~pam Attachment /~-7 RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ~9 A RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONlENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY MID ISSUANCE OF A NEGIITIYE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED BASE LINE ROAD WIDENING PRWECT, PHASE II WHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Base Line Road W1dening, Phase II; and WHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves 't~EnTromaental Assessment tntttal Study and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Base L1ne Road Widening, Fhase II. SECTION 2: The City Cierk is directed to f11e a Notice of Determine o~£i-n pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. /.~8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL For all projects roquir ing environmental review, this form rust he completed and subs itt=_d to the Oeve'•opment Review Cormittee through :he department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application', the ?lann ing Oivis ion staff sill prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will 6e filed, (2) The prof ect sill have a significant envi ranmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied 6y the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Oate Filed: Project Title: BAS'c LINE RDAD WIDENING, PHASE II Applicant's name, Address, Telephonr.City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.0. Box 807, a chn f~ amnn~ a on~n /7id1 qRg 186 Name, Address, Telephone Of Person io de contacted Concerning this Project: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer location of ?roject• Base Line Road Widening, Phase II, between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: N/A List other permits necessary from iacal, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: lane closure, street closure and construction permits from the City f ~~ PILL TRIS PROJECT: YES 'JO .. :r eat=_ a substantial change in around contours? _ ~ ?. r=_ate a substantial change in existin g noise of produce viSration or glare? X 3. .,r eat=_ a substantial chang_ in demand for municipal services ;police, fi re, water, sewage, etc.)? X 1. ~r=_ate changes in th e existing Zoning or ;eneral ?tan designations? X ~. ?emove any existing trees? How many? 25 X 6. :re at=_ the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, ammab les or ezp iosives? X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): Trees must be removed for street widening 1, Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: N/A 9, Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this p roj ect:___N/A _- _--- 3. Es*.imate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cuDfc yards: 1,000 c.y. 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the Pacts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. i further understand that additional infommation may be required to he submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: ~,'- 5ignatu ^ Title ~ tA~~~~ l3 0 '7~- „ clr. or RANCHO ccc~~ovca 2ARi Ii - I:7IT:AL 5^ ~~' ESVIRG\^t_°\T.L CHEC:C.iS' DAT°: Ae2*_: C,:: :: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA ZL:SG DF:°_: LOC SL'."3ER: PRC.'ECi: Base Line Road Widening. Phase II PRG..CT tGCdTIO\: Between Victoria Park Lane and iwanda Av nee I. F::S:RC^'~STAL I:"_^al':S (Exp lanacion of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required an attached sheets). 1. Sa i'_s and Ceolozv, Aill the proposal have s iSn if SC a..^.t :esul[s in: a. L'nscab le ground conditions or in changes in Reolo¢ic lelacionshins? b. Disrup;iors, displacements, compaction or hurial of the soil? c. Change in eopograohy or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modlf Station of any unique geo legit or physical features? e. My po centlal lncreaae Sn wlnd oz water erosion of sails, affecting either on or off Bice condi tons? f, Charges !^. erosion s1l ration, or deposition'. g. Exposure of people or proper cy to geologic hazards such as ear chquakea, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar ha:a rds? h. An increase in the race of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? / 2. Hyd ro lo¢v. will the proposal have signif Stan[ resin cs in: YTS M.4Y°E VO v - ~ ]L - JL .~- _ X _ .% _)(_ ?age ~ 1'GS :!4y3r ::a a, Changes in currents, or the course of direction of (loving streams, ri`+ers, or ephemeral st: tam channels? ~_ N S. Changes in ab sorp cion races, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface wa c¢r runoff'! N c, Alterations to the course or flow of Flood vacers? X d. Change Sn Che amount of surface eater in anv hody of vacer? ~ N e. -ischarge Into surface vacers, or anv alteration of surface vacer quality? ~ -. Alteration of groundwater chars<teristlcs? ._ __ ~ g. Change in [he quancl ty of gro•:ndwaters, either through direct addltlo~s or v1[h- dravals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? X h. 'he reduction Sn the amount of vacer ocher- vise available for public water supplies? N 1. "exposure of oeoo le nr a _„ r related hazards such as f boding or seiches? Y 3, Air Oualicv. Will the proposal have slgniticanc resoles in: a. Constant or perl.odic air emisslom from mobile or ind fret[ sources? N Stationary sources? ~ b. Deeeriorat ion of ambient air quality and/or lntetference vlth the atcalnment of applita6le air quali cy standards? N c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affc<:1ng air movement, mois CUre or temperature? N 4. glo to Flc ra. W111 the proposal have significant results in: a. Change 1n the char~eter~lea of species, lnclud ing dlverl l[y, dis[rlbutlon, or number of any species of plants? __ ~ b. Redaction of the numbers of any unique, tare or endangered spec les of plant!? ~ ~~ % 5 6 ~~- - _ c. Intzodu<[Sen of new or d!sruy rive soec'_es o: plants into an area? X d. Seduction 1n the po [social for agricul:urai yrodvc[ion? X .°auna. Will the proposal have si~nif i<ant resuia a. Change in the [hero[ teriscics of species, inci uding divers it;t, distribution, oz numbers of any species of animals? _ ~ b. Reduce ion of the nuxbezs of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ~ c, In:roductian of new or disrup Give species of animals in co an area, oz result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ~ d. Decerioracion or removal of existing fish or wildlffa habitat'. ~ povuiar ion. W£11 the proposal have significant resu its in: a. ::ill the uroposal alter the low [ion, discri- buriun, density, divers icy, or growth rate of :he il'.can population of an area? ~ n• +:u the proposal of zee[ existing housing, or create a deaand for additional housing? X Soc io-Sconomic Factors. Will the proposal have sign:: icon[ resin cs in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characcerlsclcs, includ Sng economic or co®ercial diversity, tax race, and property values? X b. Will project costs be equ Ltably distributed among proj etc benef is Series, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? % Land ae and plannan¢ Considerations, lJill the proposal have signizicant resuics ln? a. A substantial alcerac ion of the present or planned land use of an area? X b. A conf lice with any des ignatlons, obj ec [Svcs, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental ant hies? /~~ _ X c, M imp ac[ upon the qu laity or quantity of exiacing consumptive or non-eon sump clue reereacional oppo rcunlcias? _ ~ ?age vr$ `r4y3E X70 8. Transoorcatien. Will the proposal have signif Scan[ resui is in: a. Ceneratlon of sub s[ancial additional vehicular movemen c? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for nev street cons traction? X c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for nev parking? ~ d. Substantial impact upon axis sing transporta- tion systems? X e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movemen[ of people and/or goods? _~ f. Alcerat ions to or effects on present and po tentlal voter-home, rail, mass transit or air cratFlc? ~ g. Increases in Srafflc hazards co motor vehicles, 6 icyclis[s or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have signititant results in: a. A disturbance co the integrity of archaeological, paleontolo¢Scal. and/or hf srmtral rn. nn rr es~ 30. Nealth, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significane resin cs Sn: a. Creaclon of any health hazard or potential health hazard? -_ ~ h. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? __ ~ c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the even[ of an accident? _- ~ d. M lnc rease Sn the number of lndly lduals or specias of vac cor or pac;,enogen is organisms or the exposure of people co such organisms? X e. Increase !n exlseing noise levels? % f. Exposure of people to pot en[Sally dangerous noise levels? 34 (/ X / g. The creation of o ~j ae cfonable oda ra? X h. M increase Sn light or glaret X ?age > ': r5 ~;1'3E \0 11. Aescheci cs. IJSll the proposal have sl gn Sficanc resuics in: a. ?he obs crucc!on or degradation of any scenic vista or view? ~ b. '^ie creation of an aes chetically offensive site? ~ c, d tenfl!cr with the eb; etc 4:e of designated of pocen cial scenic corridors? ~ 12. lltllities and Public Services. Gill the proposal hav e a signit icanc need for new systems, or alt erations to Che following: a. Electric power? ~ b. \atural or packaged gas? ~ c. Communicaclans systems? ~ d. Ga[er supply? Y e. uas cewacer facili :ies? ~ F. Flood control structures? ~ g. Solid waste facilities? ~ h. Fire pro cecc ion? % 1. Police protection? ~ ~. Schools? ~ k. Parks or other recreational facilities? % 1. Maintenance of public faclll[Ses, including roads and flood control faciLlc ies? % m. Ocher governmental services? __ ~ 17. Ene r¢v and Scarce 4esources. U111 [he proposal hav e 41gn 12 i^_dnC LeeU1t: in: a. L'se of subscanc Sal or excess ive fuel or energy? ~ b. Substantial Enc cease in demand upon ex isring Sou rtes of energy? ~ c. M increase in the demand Eor development of new sources of energy?/~~ _ ~ d, M increase or parpacuation of the con sumptlon of non-rnnwa6le fours of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are ova ila6la? % ?ate 5 YES >aY9E SO e. Subscantlal depleilon of any nonrenewable or scare! natural resource? % 1L. `facda[mrv Findln;s of SS¢olf itance. a. Does eha pro]ect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the hob icac of fish oz vildl ife species, cause a fish or wildlife population [a drop below self euataining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal or eliminate imporcanc exavples of the ma]or periods of California his Cory or prehiseo ry? % b. Does the pra]ecc have the potential to achieve short-tern, co the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A shot[-term impact on the environment is one which occurs En a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into [he future). X c. Does the pro]ect have Impacts which are Sndividual ly limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively Considerable means that the incremencai effects of an individual pro]ect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past pro]ecta, and nmhah!n fnen•a ~rni>n.al Y d. Does Che pro]ect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Smdireccly? % II. DISC::55IOti OF Eh'CTEO'7`L\TAL iVALUATIO:f (i.e., of off irnacive answers co [he above questions plus a discussion of proposed tit igatlon measures), 13~ Pac^ Ii2. 7ETE'tl'\d:I09 On the basis of this lnlcial evaluaclon: r- I find the proposed project COtiL7 90: have a ai3nif icant ef.'ect on the environmenC, and a SEG.i:I`:c DECIAAd:IOV vill be prepared, _ I fi.^.d :hoc although the proposed project could have a s1gn1f leant XX ~ effete on [he environment, [here will not be a signii Scant eife<c in this case because the mitlgaclon measures described on an attached sheet have been added :o the proj ecc. A VEG a: A'E DEC'..;AAiION WILL BE PltEPAltED. ^~~ I flad the proposed proj ec[ WAY have a signlf Scant effect on the L__~ envir:.menc, and an E\TIAD\^.L~T L~ffAC: REPORT is required. _ / Date r' Si g"~ ~.Klit~t~-'P/~ '•e ~_- 137 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT BASE LINE ROAD NIDENIN6, PHASE [l le. This prolett necessitates the complete or partial removal of a eucalyptus windrow along the south side of Base Line Road which my cause wind erosion to offsite properties. Therefore, replacement street trees will be required with future development of adloining parcels. 6b. Funding for sub3ect project resulted from Citywide Systems Development fees. 8a. Nidening of the existing road bed and replacement of deteriorated asphalt may result 1n additional traffic volumes due to improved conditions. 8e. Although the protect is not intended to be an alternate or replacement d rculatlon arterial, traffic circulation may increase due to improved conditions. 121. Upon project completion, additional roadway surface will be added to existing street system requiring additional maintenance and upkeep. /3~ July 14, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT cxAMO,~, 9 ~' + n i ~ p A ~ U 2 J D 1977 TO: Mayor Dennis Stout, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official I. RBCOh1MENDATION: It is recommended that the appeal for reduction oP the ceiling height in a habitable space be denied on the basis that approval would be detrimental to the health and well-being of persons that might occupy said space, would be contrary to state mandated building regulations, and would allow creation of a substandard condition in violation oY the housing code and state law. li. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Sometime prior to Pebruary 1998, the appellants constructed, or had constructed, improvements within what had tormerly been attic space of their home, without bane Pit oP permits or inspections. Subsequently, permits were obtained and the construction approved subject to two conditions. One was that the space was not to be hea te.: or cooled, presumably because o[ leek oP evidence oP state energy compliance, end aecuuu.y, uie apace was uu~ w ue cuua,uereu as unu,~au,e because oC lack of required heating and because oY substandard ceiling height, of approximately 7'-0" in the area. tsar ly this month, the Building and Safety Division was requested to consider waiver or modification o[ the code ceiling height requirements so as to enable the storage space to be considered as "habitable". After consideration of the circumstances end code issues and review with the city attorney, it was determined by the Building Ofticial that approving the reduction would not be within the scope oP authority [or granting a modification but rather would necessitate changes in both the building and housing codes. Both of these codes are mandated far local adoption by the state, and amendments to those requirements are limited to local geological, to os r~ -~, or climatic conditions. They also mandate making o[ an express lndi ng of need by the governing body (the City Council) that the condition(s) exist to the extent that a change is justified. It is questionable that such a determination can be concluded in this case. I~ / Steft Report July 14, 1999 Page 2 Ceiling height requirements for habitable rooms have been included in the Uniform Building Code since its inception in 1927. They originated, not only, as some would believe, to satis [y aesthetic urges, but rather were based upon conclusions reached by health officials in early - centuey studies of tenement housing conditions in the eastern pert of the nation. The appellant has ind is sled in the appeals request that they are paying taxes as if the room is habitable. Verification of the latest tax assessor records, after the normal 2% annual increase is deducted, show only ;1,454.00 increase in improvement market value, es compared to over ;3,000.00 permit value for the non-habitable space. [f we were to assign a value to the attic area as habitable space, our value would be ;13,000.00 for conversion of the 480 + square feet of area. III. CONCLUSION: tt is the conclusion of the ste tf that to grant this appeal would require amendments to two state- mendated codes end findings by the City Council, of express needs that cannot be justifiably concluded. To grant relief through some other form would result in creation of substandard conditions. There [ore, the appeal snou :u be denieu. Rasp ec flatly submitted, Jerr R. Gre ni~ Ouilding Official JRG:dm ~39~ BDILDING PBBNIT Bt11~01N0 AND SAFEN Orvl~ • BUILDIt~ir city of rancho cucamonq~a PERMIT ~ ~_ ~ ~3 __~pl~_ uow~ Z lM ~Y'1 ..__1~ _~ p ' M. - , 0.mr 2tW I~.q_ MPS.._~11cMOls____ all»._~,~3 _jyn/F~owE12 O 'cYm...b. .. .---~-- -'- (jcuwJ.r~~7., I._ - ---- / a. ne..n ll•y w._ NIA Fq. .. . Onp^n _ _ __ __ _ ~I{ Q Mdwr lln .. .. 4 _ _ ~_.. W Cr4 S.o i5, m.. IreRw1 ~Yx,prrl,.. /nwly~:. 9i1:',~ '3 .Nht--- ~' !K~Bf(Tpf~-E_ ATItc . STLRRb~~.,:~i ~ Ire- ~. ~.~.T Z /y/1LD lJri U'~ FAD DJ41 , tfYs/«^.~Yi1~ ,~., - ~ kv. d W. a. W. Iwmn (Y.I. 4. .1 ^ IpuirM YniN 1 ripr4= w ~. ., __ ,la~~ --L YIurN LSw - - - __ lN^pM _ IWYI Id MGro.ad {an On, . ,_ frq_ir, 0. T D n. ~ ~dl~exl A 71'IC 37dQ17v~ AND tillt.l"7'y ., (lOQ/1'1 SNAC(. k~ P36_CnNRI"Ru~fS~ )p.rION t v I~. <NiCA a ..I~ ~ ~ lfWIT_.. ~...._ . .3~!~c i OIMNWf I RgrfMt __ MAUTII L.R-_... - ---- ~-- ----+~ - I OIMR _.Nr ~ ."~h ;~ Atz_ ofcnurn~Hw.., 1. Xp o., i Nrv r'1 MQ ~ I MX. ~ 6Hn ~ ~. I plmarnex rl~ ,, ~,..,. r ,., I w ~~ NOmd~ ~ % ~O ,..IrJe q1r=/~ ~-r-~,N~//f~ I _(.' / ~ I•L /_ I '.'\ ~~ "JJ (('' YInIYr• rrrRT4xTNR'N Lrf N 4v r l r I r xn~MIRRy'rr'IINTIMr'n;l•rN Yew u.i1114 rv e. I.wuR.l .+p. •Umnl r... . ~µr~rrr +.M•r 1n~n vf ~ t.d.. ~r rN i~~~r •i~ r~ M.y..r d•I a Ll~"~.-,~~r I ~ = , r l r 4n r I. r 1 nn[FILIILp 4441MTIr'4 ~ ti ^ • r?J YrnY. "~~ ~ A ....^ r~f.~ IY .nL .%,. ^il' i. e I r Yr. ~~~ r. FTIIIC ~'.R UI It11YIT1UX RYA M iY UpR[NRxTInN IM~YNtN; I. N .w x..,... ....., ... ,... •- •I 4 r r V ~~. u Y r r nl.l. r p. ~iu ~ m. " n .~ M 4x~h ~ u..~ .. .. .,. ~.. ..... ..r ...~. .,. ....... ..... .o-w ..w L.Iq. w.. n n r I ~ x J• Y••r I ^ r~.l• m~Nti 4timr ~r ~. IY > v. M r rY N ~ O ~}.yix ~ll. r - . • .M .. n . w l .r. L.n• ,r R n ~ . . r ~ ryNRr1YlSNN INI.I Y XY kN1 ~.I _ .. r .ul .e.r ~-. ..... r r ~..... Wer. ~ .. br >.Y ~ I YM M I.r.Yxrr Vrw1 11 Ar.. Y. wN n. •r I x I i ~ ~ ~ . ^ 6 n n..el . ~.nay .r. .... ab..e ... -u r .... b .... ... v ~ ux ' a v m ~m .Y N • A Y M .. . I Lr Illnr Y Y.M ., M rM . . q~ _.. ..... . .. r u . y...:... ..... ..... c .. r l O W w ~ ~ ti • ~/{`~~ 1` .-I n-..r U ....LUr.. ~, I er rrN WiYr I- ~ ....r. ,..~ rr. ..w ur 1 rYU.M l _. R R I' • I..r •e.r r..e.. - ~ T V ./ ~~~ / ~~/ r~.1~..Ir.i y~ ~~~ .T ~/ ..~ILRyd41. ` ~~(IJIIAU INSVF (.IUN (,OPV rnX a n e4a . p.rpnm .l . 133 I.MrI ..Yrr I r^r" ,M• I M JY .1. .I MY IY11M Iw..pn. ..il..uy W Mr IIYyI * y •Y •ml nrv.. ~ +Y .w :.. t n X ~M. M ..e.r.n. ~..IIM NYrw __ . Yd. / r J d•nT p.rm.l .• I ~I. Ir11.A Orl .'0^' I Npd rOl,deNA pnd wr b ml rnnmxdw ,. . o.,..,,l.d w n r.ra~dN a oopNlxed Ip. ~'C ..,ql BOILDIN6 P8BY1T ( INSP1{CPIIXi 8Ht)OBD) _ - - • INSPECTION itEC0~0 • ~ ` 4 IPw1AAIlOfY If.• Cwl'x Cats irrn SrM[Yr fmn, e.rw sr„1. 1..,.«,;x r ~~ ' ~ INSPECTION NOES fvYp twlnr~, elmen. NrJ. vv h rw•. M~.. llYVV. Mm., v.,n, it l~ _ rf,Yfdalr fe '. No.n. A 4.ar Lin. CIraQ{l. bYn _- _ _._.__._.. _.. __-__ ._~_~_ -.- ____.____~ ~ L11G Wxr7. p.rM MYJ'Y. 4rwM 1 G.MY w/ fnl~w., fed Orra. _ _ -- . r, g4MY1G: Wd,l. ..«. la. .rYn,. ....ry. W+n. r,w. 4r..Ar. u.. ,... G ~------- ----- ---- ---- NAU/rlroN 1\.fv.x, 1YM.rY. v9M. 4wM -- ~ - _ ___ ___.~. -- ~~ u b~ _ okA f!NWN!-Ir ~.r•lr ~N ~ ) ~~N~ .. ~~~ 1 YA ~ ~ 4(/N ! _..... _,. •NrHlO~ AIN tnY wMl MA.~, nTxr 1 .N _ -- ` .. - - . flryN11• IAYN Sll:~'M~ Nwn, YmNn.rr lµ r ~K~ .... . ~ ~ I ~ 1 Ar.. i~.flnrrr F.i Y.y .. ~ . . _ .. .. m 1 wY M[•Iw: boon r.~...e..; C.•rx 4w ~~ 1 T ! r^v~ (erx farts, Nu Ae. ~ I .. _~ wN r ~. t1•r'.. ._ __ X SWIMMING M4llf-A d..rY arms u1nA:A; wm,,. 41 er-~.,r,l ~ Y Ir w rm 1 I ' ~ Yt~s~y~,~~ ~~I~ IL.sti.+ ~ +P I ~~ T =. xx.'' • , n V ~r( V.a Y 1Mnr . . i .. rcArH: ~. A.,•I r rr i. ~, . .n ~~ ~~ (( .~~r (/t ~ I (!V Nr ~i f o I 1.r : '.. r -._ + ;RmNIY~r Is p p.~on!(,~~d•b; twg(,c IfYI$CEILANE011f i ~p /~ fr.~ ~ .~,~. I c.~y ,, I 6(Z@(et~ f ` ! ~ ' ~t,~p~~ ; I I I ~ ___ ..,r. „N y• /3~~ P.LECIIEICAI. PSRLEIT euM.wNO Iwo a~rr city of rancho Cuc ~, I~- ~, ~ ELEC/MECHJIUI6G. ,., PERMfT _..,~.~.:"w.,l Fu M.. I Il.wnu ~. TOTAI ELECTRKJ1l FEES Iwo awn\ww. TruYas ~~7.~y~ `P7Lt~':IiT.r'o.' ~ 3 MVIYRi ARLYWM Y. I ~ ~. M. 1. I.rr.V. IY~ Iw Y Y. a. ~rra~....~r~.r .~.rr~~ rR Y rl .R Y1 haYYa~ Y tl~R Y .Ina r r. V t :.~ . _r..~ _.., _...,.._ .._ Z ~1_.~~r r.~~.. \RY MI~..~:~ ..r..~ tO.:....IR..i1...,Y. W [ .R.w'.'w~.. .wMr ~ ...I i. ~. IV.. R. ~. ~~fT. ~.J~Y.IV O..w loYi V 'w w ravlrmsrs or vs.roll rla yMr~^ M\YrMM111MW 411tt M.~ JWr...J. lw ... Y.I.I YOn rYM TOTAI MECHANIUE FEES WRM CIYM GM TWIM _ IaM. On411 _ IwMrw WMr HwM~ Rr4IM Srri. Sswr CYrn. - -_~ ' - -~ - - --~ _)- F {~ l ~..r r. r r. w rM~.. ~ u.r..n r..w Ylr R..r ~ : ~..~.rrn I..: rr ui ~ • rr .4. 1 awli• TrT~ ~M -. ___ MN. WNIYa ___ ~ ~Y~9f,.„ i'I A `U!.f.~ If Y sY.1 eY. erriW.Y y R Y.Y r r.~.w ..w ~ ir' r".. ~ ~ Lw~ ~ ~.ri }Ipl CN. I1 IY M. 1 Iwrn ~ ----'- Ir.M~ +.. 1~~,~Ir~.+r~w~r~ rJws. r. r lurr wrr '~...rr. ~ ~. r~.~ijifi ~.'j :~~~'i~~"3~~\"ppr~~L~~r~~~~.~.1r~.~r.~//~~~~r~Y/.,~('~ t}Vwn ..r...i~+fYLiY/(r~itr.rf~`yru- TOTAL FIUMBING FEES ~T~ ~i.R ~~.r ~~. F,~~ W. raar c.-E. M 4. r. W ~ ~_/~ _.~ '~ Y~rf~ p_.~ -C --- r TIrN . M sM.RI/YYMYM/R~sF Mrrl .\Yr IIIWN1IT Ir11/ M. sl/Y~ IY/Y1MIr1AW N ~T~ .~~ wµy M vRSrrw~ I .Y1 AYRR.Ar n nlrl RwwRWN Y • ~~ Y MIIYRI Nr Ir yR BSCHRFT FBOM ONIFOBY BOILDING OODH noon ONnrrlaa See. 1101. /.) CeYleg ~~ Htliuaa sP~ shW Mve a «ilwg heiBM d na less tlun 7 reu 6 i«hea <xapt as am«wue permitted N thu seaioa. Ititchem, 6Yh, batlnowm aed biletcompraoe«s sny love. aaliog height d na less Auo 7 red menmed m Ae htwestt Dml~^^ I1e"'tAc ceiliol. Whrt expaedbeammil'vtg nembetam aP~u hYS mm4hu.mawsanaq ceiling Mght sell h muwW m the bottom d mne nKmbas. Wlerz exposed beam ttdiog metMen art spaced MI6 inches«m«eooanta, «ilutg hdght slWl h< mrJSUrcd to tlk Oatont d the Ault sopponed hY these trcmhas, Pm"~ dot me carom of me memh«s h as kas men 7 ka above the no«.. Irony man inabuildiog Wsaslapiog «3liug, the prncribedceiliyhdgN t« me mom u mryimd io only aoo-lWr the am thneof. No partim d the mom messmmg less moo S feet fmm me fioislted doer b the finished cell®t shW h included io any ^^ dlhe miatatm ama theteor. If any mom hu . hsssed aAiag, the proMbed «Iling heidn u tegand in two thitdy dle an dIGM1~ ha N nOpiC shat mC llelght Ol mC fWICd ee1611g be ICtS tIYO ~ ICCI. ! 3i E SRCSBPT PBOY ONIP~gI BDOSING WDB Room iWSwrsebne Sec. 583. (q CeBing ffelghn. Habimble space shall have a ailing height of nd kss Nan 7 feel 6 inchn nceq n arhdwix petmined in Nis section. Kitchens, An6, baOuoams sod soiks compartmenn may ha« • ttiling height o! nd kas Nan 7 (en IrcnutM so the lowest projection from the «iline. Wlrerc npoaed Mam«i1M8 member amspa«d x less Oun48 inches onanxb ceiling height sMll be measured ro the bdram of thex members. Wham espoxd beam aRioB member oe spsad x48 inches or Morton anxr. ailing height shall be nwfurcd m the banam of the dnk supported Dy One membes, providd That the 6oeom of the member is rsd kss stun 7 fen above the Ro«. If any room in abu0ding hn a slopin6 ailing, Ole gexsibcd «ilin6 height fw the roan u rcquircd in only anehalf the area Ihercof. hlo portion of the mom meawnng Ica Nan 3 fan from Nc finishal Door to the finishdl casting shall be included in any wmpuwkn of the minimum arts Neteof. If anY mom has a forma ceiling. the ptexnbed ceiling heiBhs is required in Iwo-thirds she area Ihereo(, but in to cox shall the height of 1M Tuned ailing b Ins than 7 feet. Chapgsr 70 SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS f~Knhbn c.. soot r.s n.....t •n.M,;sn;.......,.,.r;M,.I,.....r,,,I.;,.s, ;. A.,.....;....n to he w unwfc huildin6 in attsedencc with $adion 203 of the Building Cwk; or wry huilJinN w laulinn Ilsenvsf, ilwludinN nny dwullin8 unit, tluext nann,w,wrilc of rooms, or the prcmixa un whkh she ssr« is located, in which IM:rc eaintx any of the (ollowinB llstcdcondisiau to an ntennhm eMsngersshe life, limb, health, property. xfctY w wclha of tM publk or tM acupanss themof shall M deemed and hereby is declared m M a wbsmMUd Duildin8. (bl InadegeNe Snnilallon. Inadequxe unitwion shall include bus riot M limikd to she following: I. Ixk M, ur improper wa<rcloxt. dwlory, bathtub m shower in a dwelling unit w Iod8in8 house. 2. lack of, or improper wakr cloxts, lavatories arM hmhtuhs or showers per numMr of guests in a hdel. 3, lack o(, or improper kitchen sink in a dwelling unit. 4. lack of hd and cold Nnning weer m plumbing Oaturcs in a hdel. 5. Ixk of ha and cold running wrier m plumbing fiatuses in a dwelling unit d IadBing hauu. 6 Lack of adcquxe hexing fxilities. 7. lxk uf, or improper opengion of required vemilssin8 cyuipmcnt. g, lack of minimum amounu of nnunl light end vend W ion required by This code. 9, Rwrm amt spree dimensions Mss Ihan roquimd by mix code. 10, lack of rcquirN ekcsrical lighting. I I. Dunpceu o(habiuble soma. 12. Infestxian of insects, vermin or rodents az detertnitkd by she health officer. 13, General dilapidnion or improper maintenance, 14. Lack dc~nnection so required swage disposal system. I3. Lxk of adeyuxa garMge and nsbhish ssdagc and removal fxililles as dttemined by the healthQoffs«r. I~ / IDSCBRCC PROP ONIPOBY ROII.DIRG CODS IIAtYDROOH Room Dlrs~nabrn-SwMlon 1207 Room size, tightness of construction, minimum «iling height, number of xcupwts and ventilation all inkraet with each other to establish the inkrior living environmrnt insofar az odors and moisture arc concerned. Therefore, the U.B.C. mgulates room sizes to azsist in maintaining a comfortable inkrior environment. and the minimum room sius become increasingly important az buildings baome ever tighkr M their eonsrruetion dm to errergy conservanan requirtments. Seniors 1207 (al regulates ceiling heigh8 not only to assist in maintaining a comfortable indoor living cnYVOnmen4 but also to provide sakty for the xcupann of the dwelling. As our populadon becomes utcteasingly taller, it is imponanttlW tall individuals be able to move aboutwittrout striking projections from the ceiling with dtek heads. The bait rtxl uirtmem fa a smooth ce it ing of rc lative ly constam height is that the ceiling height b< not lea than 7 feN 6 inchn for habitable space (see definition fm habitable space in Sation A09). Kikhem, baths, halls, ek., may have aceiling height leasthan l ket6 inches, but under nocircutnstances mey it 6e less than 7 feet measured m the lowest projection from the ceiling. Porthouceilingshavingtaposedbeamswhich pmjectdown tmmthe ceiling surface, then ate two criteria: 1. Where the ecilina beam members arc spaced closer than 48 inches on center, the railing height Of 7 feet 6 inches is measured to the baton of These membm. 2. Where the<aposed beam ceilin8!!rcmbers arc spucd at 4g inches or rrwre on cener, the minimum roiling height of 7 feet 6 inches is measured [o the bottom of the ceiling deck which is wpportcd by the beams. However, in no case shall the batmn of the members be less than 7 feet above the ^oor. Far rooms with sloping ceilings, [he code rtquirts only that the prcscnbed ceiing height be maintained in ono-hal( the area of the room. Nowevec no ptvtion of the room which has a ceiling height o(less than 5 feel shall be used in lh< computations (or minimum Floor area. In the case of a room with a tarred reJing, the code requires the pkscribcd «iling height in two thirds o(th<area anJ, as m all cases for projxtions below the ceiling. the furred area may trot be less 7 feet abov<the Door, The provisions of Subsections 12071b1 and Icl, limiting the minimum sizes o! roems, apply to hatrnable rooms except [a kitchens. Thus, kitchen, water closet compartments, bathrooms, utility rooms, janitor clouu, hallways, ek., have no minimum size w area. ~3~ G S7CCBBP'P FBLIII ONIPUBII BOILD[NG OODB INTHBPEBTATION Q: I would like your eaplanabon as to why the heiRM of ceibngs in residential, habeable rooms u 7 i¢et 6 inches and other areas of re<idenoal are allowed](eel Also. stairnavs are regwred headroom of 6 ieet 6 inches Is (here a relation between these diiierem heiRhis of ceilings, and, ii 50, why a (here no minimum ceiling height for Ihq.e commeroal and indusinal buildings where people spend eiRhl hours each day mn¢ Thud of a 2a-hour period v • In order to answer the questions raised wnh regard to • ceding height requirements (or reudenual as well as commeroal bwldings, a hnei rundown of the hrslon of this ivpe of provision m codes might be in order. Around the turn of the cenmrv conditons in so-called tenemem houses were unbearable al best as they were dark. unsanitary, gloomy and generally considered until for human habdation. The reasons for these eondoions were manifold. bin primarily were lack of adequate tight and vennlanon and inadequate room size, mduding very low ceiling heights Ipart¢ularly in attics and basemenlsi. As a result o(ihese cardibons, many states. including New Vork and California, adopted statutes regulating tenement houses and such statutes were quiteo0en referred to as"tenement house ads. "' The regulations attempted to get al the root cause of the conditions lull dexnbed and, Therefore. preunbed minimum room azes. minimum Isght and ventilation and minimum ceding heights. These IvPes o! regulation hung on over the years and iourd their way into most budding codes. Similar povisions were first adopted in the 1927 edition of the Umlprm Bwidmg Code and, eacepl !or minor uanahons, nave continued e55enbaiiY Ilre same until the present time. Usually, a bgure of g feet or 71e¢t 6 inches has been used as a minimum ceiling height for habitable Irving space and same lower ceiling heights, down to as low as 7 feel. for dher rooms wmcn are na can>idried iu u iieune'u'~~ iumii. '. also ndice Thal the Uniform Building Code does na regulate the ceiling height a1 all m storage closets and laundry rooms. The headroom clearance regmremem (or stalreavs has a dd- lerenl intent and that is to pr¢venl inlury to tall people Although bosh stairway headroom clearance regmreriMnts and rtrom ceiling heights havesome relationship to the height of people, the stairway headroom regwremenl o sbidly a salety hazard provision. We are not completely sure why commeroal and industrial faolities hm no ceding height requrements m the bolding code but generally, part¢ularly insofar as industrial estabbshmems are concern¢d, iuncnonal requirements far operapon establish ceiling helghtswhmh are adequate for Ne health and salety of the workers. We also suspect that during the early 1900s, as the union move- ment became mare eflecuve, union comrads, etc. also had some• thing to do wnh increased health and salety in the work place and. therefore, Ihs problem did na mandest rtsell to such a degree that n was tell necessary to provide building code provivons to cover liu>>dvabun. Alw, during flit. same percd, many ;lairs rcgu!a!rd health and safely m the work place Through indusinal accident commission and health departments. And. of course, today we have the Federal Occupational Safety and Mealih Agency regulat- ing healihand salety in places of empluymem and apparently all of these various agencies have handled the problem reasonably well. We have not heard al any serous problems ar, in fad, even minor problems relating to ceding heights m commercial and indusinal 6mldmgs and imagine That it Ibex problems da occur they occur very infrequently. Therefore. anhe presem time we can see no need to regulate ceiling heights m commeroal and udw- lnal buildings l ~~ ( l ,r..,. CUSTOMER'S COPY (774) 989-1R51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Otfi~ Bax SW 9320-C Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ecegetl 4 1 ate {p~ A~Er¢s4 'y \ NC NO-- DFSCflIViIO '.UNT 0109J1~}000 OINEP UCEN5E5 nHO VEPMli6 DI~T. {II.tAO BUILDING PEPMIfS OiJWIJ6W IHiEPESi ~~~ 01 )[01510 PRINTED MNTERI~L 130901~]]IO PECRE/.iIDH LEES 01 ]901 R!0 PIArvryING LEES 01 ]9T.]YA ENGINEERING ZEES q.pgp.ydq BUSIME55 LICErv5E4 _ _ 01]W1d910 -- G•$N DVFgSXORi _. . ._ ~....... ..m A E76 of •u r~u[iw ... _... .... REE NW&E GEP Ii~ • DS U ya ... .. ~~ _ ~A.Y~ .., v ______ _~ V T~ I _~ ~ V (1 _ Recaipl NumSar TOTgL C~ ~~ ~ ~ 61005 R,.L.a ~~ nr~ 133 ~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 19, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REViEN 88-32 - NELSON - M appea o e ann ng antA ss on s ec s on modify a condition of approval requiring the payment of an in-lieu fee for landscaping within the I-15 Freeway right-of-way along the protect frontage for 1.55 acres in the General Industrial Specific Plan, located on the east side of Hyssop Drive, north of 4th Street - APN: 229-331-02. I. RECOMIENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the ann n~ ssion's decision to sustain and modify the City Planners decision to deny the applicant's request. II. BACKGROUND: This project, an industrial building at the southern en o ssop Drive ,lust north of 4th Street, was approved by the City Planner on January 11, 2989. One of the conditions of vel coal nnnr~ne nivi elnn MnAi ti nn 6, ronui red the oavment of~~an 1n-lieu fee for landscaping within the i-15 Freeway right-of-way per Planning Caamission Resolution No. 87-185. On May 9, 1989, the C1ty Planner received a request to delete this freeway landscaping condition. The appitcant stated opposition to the condition for cost considerations (see the attached letter from the apDllcantl. The City Planner denied the request based on the established City policy and past development review actions. On June 4, 1989, the applicant appealed this declslon to the Planning Commission. me Item was heard at the June 14, 1989 meeting, where the Commission sustained and modified the appeal, significantly reducing the area to be landscaped within the I-15 Freeway right-of-way. On June 12, 1989, the applicant appealed the Commission's declslon to the Council. III. ANALYSIS: The Pianning Commission has determined that the I-15 vore Freeway right-of~vay is an important regional transportation corridor through the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga. My property which adjoins the freeway should be landscaped Tn the same way that all development is required to landscape their "frontage" along public right-of-way. Caltrans does not have /~O CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MODIFICATION TO DR 88-32 -NELSON July 19, 1989 Page 2 plans to iandscape this corridor, but indicated that they would allow others to landscape it subtect to their review and standards. Hence, the Planning Caemission established a policy in October 1987, requiring landscaping or payment of fees in-lieu of construction. All new development protects along the I-15 Freeway corridor have since been conditioned accordingly. The policy requires "all new development adtacent to the I-15 (Devorel Freeway" to landscape and irrigate the freeway right-of-way which adtoins their property. The current policy, however, does not provide any latitude for staff in how to apply the condition for landscaping. Sn its application to indlvtdual protects, the policy has been interpreted to require landscaping of the entire unpaved area (not including median) of Lhe freeway right-af-way. The protect in question, Development Review 88-32 (Nelson), is required to provide for landscaping (through payment of an in-lieu fee) on both sides of a northbound on and off-ramp to 4th Street (See Exhibit "C"1. This area, according to the applicant, amounted to approximately 8 acres to be landscaped. The subtect property has over 1,000 feet of freeway frontage which is required to be landscaped. This 1,000 feet consists entirely of the northbound on-ramp. However, the lower Mo-thirds of the site are undevelopable at this time because of a flood control retention haHn Tharafnro fha nnrltnn ni fho ei to uh1'A ie actually being developed has a freeway frontage of under 300 feet. Development of the southern (basin) portion of the site can occur only after Day Creek Channel 1s improved. The applicant has proposed to construct additional parking in this portion which would potentially add 200-300 feet more of developed land which "fronts" onto the freewey. The additional parking proposed by the higherauseWwhfchewouid increase thetvalueiof thebprojectded to a At the June 14, 1989 meeting, the Commission heard the applicant's appeal and modified the City Pianner's condition for freeway landscaping by requiring landscaping only within the area beMeen the protect's westerly property line to the first roadway (northbound I-15 on-rang at 4th Street). This area amounts to about one and one half acres to be landscaped. The area to the west of the on-ramp (about six and one-half acres) was thus deleted from the landscaping requirement. The applicant has indicated that this reduced the in -lieu fees from 5315,000 to f60,000. I fl CITY CWNCIL STAFF REPORT MODIFICATION TO OR 88-32 - NELSON July 19, 1989 Page 3 In addition, the Planning Comaission agreed to defer the area to be landscaped adJacent to the existing flood control retention basin until the basin 15 reanved (which should occur when Day Creek Channel is ieprevedl. The applicant 1s requesting that the requine~ent,~or freeway landscaping be deleted Tn its entirety. Brad Buller City Planner BB:BH;sp Attachments: i Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhlbit "C" - Exhlbit "D" June 14, 1989 Resolution of Letter froal applicant City Planner Approval Letter Site Plan - Planning CoaaNsslon Minutes of Oenial / ~~ John W. Nelson IB .Y. Crntrnl .{rrnue CDlnnd. CA 91786 pvg rJl J~9B Mnid:{ ~~0 ~1 $~,a~~~ Jmv 11, 1989 City of taoeho eveaaoepa cite council 9120 Duvlim 0.oad Raveho euevvovpa. C1 91770 ' Attu: 0•mir Stout Oex[ bYOC Stout: t av pru•ntl) ip the prveur of oDtaioivq p•rvltr to emvt[uet •p ivduatrial bui ldivp vv gyuop Avvu•, mdvr your 0u1gv 0.nier pmbr Dv BE-l2. I +ould lib to reputft a vodit icatim to th• emditiovr of approvl for ehir proj•c t. a aoditi•A Dy tD• Dlaminp corivviov. 4p•eitieally, th• eovdltion rpalrinp in-11•e tear to D• paie to tb• eiq to[ Lvdrupivp •ithiv the I-15 heeny riph[ 01 v). TD• juvtifie•tiop for tbis repuu[ it Dr warily oe• of •roeoaie bardabip. Thv uleulat•d vn• fo[ MHrvlvinp tb• [a• L vo biq• [•latiVV to tD• air• of tb• pare•1 b•i ep d•vlop•d, it r•vdvv tD• par<•1 aeovoaie vl ly mNUiDle to QevvloD. Thv p[ej•e[ vill .oat 1700,000.00 to convtruet. City Ives ot0•[ than th• in-lieu to •n about 5/0.000.00. Th• in-li•u [n aloe. v •v addi[i oval 360.000.00. Tbi• D[SVgr tool hu to apDtoxi ut•ly 5100,000,00 or le pvreeot of tb covtrue tlov ewb. Bvuur• ct CD• unipu• conti0ue •tiov of eb• vubj•ct proD¢eq, tbL <onaitiov pl•cav vn uvwumabl• d•vaed m th• o•vn !or dn•lopivq [hair property. It thir cavditiov L vlloa•e to [Hale Se •et•a, th• Dro}•pt ail! bee [o ba abavdvead at prof Govt and bv[daDly to tD• ow•n n[ the DiogrtV. Tbv +ould npnttully to[m an inV•na emdoatiov avtiov invpbinp th• City. Obviouriy, ve +ould btu to aq it po the fa[, but v +vuld hav no other option left. It 1v for tbua nuvvr, I a. tayo[tully [.pun flop • aodvticatiov to the cvodi[ionr o! apDro+vl. Very truly your, ,von y. Nelson CITY -' cc: Oao Guerra cn bish, cu•cra trop. Barry Ma•ov YounO, Bnt1a, fluvphner, t Muon CITY OF ~ ~3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA JL"~ 2:> III YM as,a,~,~~ W ~l;<,~,~s~F ITEM: APPEAL OF MOD. r TITLE: LETTER FROM API PLANNING DIVISION z'aacxlsrc:~ ~ RIY Oi MNOIO NGMONGA w+W we.,..f. <.>r~urrnn mxwie~ Jum 19, 1979 w. John wlsen 1f M. Cmtrtl N•nu• tp1aN, CA 917!6 suutcr: iatwr tA103WV11R ctpnmcx iM a1 raz Mar w. when At aNr Jun IA, 1919 .•tIM ae n•n1M talffien dlr•c4d .. as a• ner n.awr m .parr fM1n•aHM Cendlnen w. s of tM apPUp•1 1•car ror a• Wor• a•ftlpa•9 vnJ•ct. m• nar cp+nnpn slmnn a. Itr14 e1 a• •m NtMn a• 1-If inr•y H*t-o/~•r to t. laNSCapN ana9n a• p•7~•nt of • in-11•v fw. ThI• aacislpn a oElh Gy ~~1~p•riol Etpl:~inlnytNq N. N4 of alff~ttt•~ fol7wiig • 10. Find~)MM~a ~Tnft a• nr cwNlttn If conflst•n! rla a• htY's ppilry of r•QW HM landupNM Naln lM 1.15 ins•y Hy:t-o/-wY. h. That ae nn cenditln npnfwrtf • W1/tutlon a a• off ql Ml pnJatt apprar•1 for 9n•lapfMns br1M 61-31. L. Th•t a• atMMN caNltlon rill net W d•trlwnt•1 to a• pvDlle hNla, aNat7, pr rNhn, or .t•rtailr InluHauf to pnp•rtla pr i~poraaanta to a• rlclnlty. Cendltienf: This aodlfleNlm to M M-II 1a apprnN aublKt to a• reilarlM cpndlt/onf: 1. All cpNltfana e1 •nro•al In as appnr•1 1•tbr datN Janwry 11, 1911, syyrarlM Dn•lgwnt f•r1r 7L39 Mail applr. a7e•It FM1M•HM flWfln Candl tiM w. 5 a•11 e• •edlflN m rr•d a• Ieilew: a IM nt9a p/ a• pf ae cash : Ma1n ae NM to a• : r•apnl o/ senHty If b Ya an +wn, ala coNltiM na aoH RN p•r a• naml:p fwlnlm's of nceton at It'• JIM 11, l9tl awtlnff. M appal e1 als dacl sia •vIt N HIN 1n +HNM .la as 11•minf ce.laln sacntary tM•twr ula a 3116 appal ia. tr yn aauld nfn pro aatlnf cgc•n1~q as seMllcatia, plwn do cwt heflaG t0 cent•it 7ntt wrMr •t 716-9H-I161. Sl ncenlY. LOMI OEKIfI 9[IMTlalf fln r r C1ty na CITY OF n`exJf /J(~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: F M ~D. TO DR 88-3 ~ITY PLA!!1 TITLE: PPRd1/IL LTTER _ EXHIBIT: e ~~~ ~, yb~ ~\~ O ~; ~7TTiT~ ~6\ \\\~~ Cl I I Ill 1 1 1 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION ,-':-"~~\ ~ AREA TO BE LANDSCAPED PER THE REVISED CONDITION ,:?;,\ ~. ~ ~; . e ~>; i ~~ ~ 0 ~ PROJECT SITE E 1 I tl~~ ~: i ~~ I I'i ~ iITE ~: i rt Fees for landscapping of this area to be deferred urltN the basin is removed G~ NORTH L, - T- - CITY OF ' ~ J ITEDI: APPEAL OF MOD. TO DR 88-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: SITE PLAN PLANNING DIVISION ERHIBIT: ~_ SCALE: ~_ aN tlslpss n. nmlfluna YD DtYEEtlvl[Irt uv.~_ee- - nn IpP.,I a eM nt> Fr'ri KdTiron !o dip t •,~Mwt • t Mtttq pl eprroxl rtwiriq tM PtpeM / x to-11w lx Ior LMauplp rtgle tM ldt Eratr•~Y rigntrol-w) aaq tM pro1Kt fnntpt for 1.55 KM in tM Wmm•1 [ndar[tl Olftrict liupwee lq of tM IMUarf+l SpKtltc Ihn, 1wttN an [M ent sltle of Nrafq OrM. norm e1 qn SMK - NRI: iit- 3R-OE. Errtt Norn•r, Aftltnnt pLpIIK, pnfnntN eM st,H nwrt. cnnnan McMI mrle•d wm+c co+em. Bfmy Mxn. Ywq, X•nrie, Nwwrln, t N•pn, atorKY tar fppli<mt, rtmee tMY wn tfmKfttq tort [M in-11q Itt M ra Kd pxme a KwOgc nrdfMP• M sad tM •ppllcxt cwl• Mt utilln tM laM In tM f1oN uf<n Maln until PtY [r••N u•m•1 ra lnwovetl, tN tt tMY cw10 Mt alert M let tM 1W Iq la far unt11 tM cnaw•1 ra oePrdr•d, LM rte Miq lorc•e tc } ill a wells InMrtrl et Mfldlrg Mx 1g1na11Y p~emel. Me laud tMt11 tM Imilq (N rx eel rn Wd, tM 1w11ctM wytd Mn to aetnen tM pralKt of tM poywt mould pKDx acenwlcaOy un4xlnlq des Int ewalq SSS of tM coxtrvctix <e+tf. M sutN tMY rn xlr emiglq flog a 100 feet fron[ge InfuN of tM l,OpO loaf enntp• of eM IMirt ppnl. Xe hl< tM lawmewtl pet mould Mt pex/ie tnyoM. M felt tort pxme tM tltY wultl wt tiles tM ux of tM taco porn K [Mf tlq, tM Ippltcwt rn M1q Ierwd Into a r•Wnd me of nM propptY fx eM MMfit of tM CRY [Aargn Nx1d statN tort it tM wnMtp mpnt tM property rllMUt the Ywriedgt Nlt tM Mtcn pbin of r••ulnd, 1t ws Mt tM nawnfln illy el [M Clty to M tun eM wnntsp Rnx tM coMtrantf of tM DropptY• iMn wn w furtMr wOl It wq•ntt. Cp~imtomm CM<be itatN tM tgont of IlKfcgiM nwlne t tnls ties WpffM N Mtn Yr,ltlt MrMn tM f•I[ !M Cpxlfflpn flgYld wnftdp nwtrlq tM ItMKnIM WKmt w tM fl•M wool pnln tt tM qq tort pxtitM pMMltir~tMntapni<pjNif • ante eN moo 0 tafo pultfllll M prgptY awp OY IMn•nq tM rau• of tMir ItN. [a~tmlonm tlhn MY •M }e1fwY qnN tort Me r•wirxxt for tM entln 1,000 foK fnn<pe wf uuub. [nwinlomr LMrlct qlN 1/ eM CDYtfnan ntl lorrrlY pxn confrpKN vltn a d•11ar sltuatan .Mn Intray Irwtq• MM•M uM•wloptll• 1•M. eerrye nmson, 1•nlor Ciril EMlnmm, s[tted tnla pppptY rti unlw• IM 1! m tlfe tM 11 rf< dr • In•wy w•rwp wt Inwlrtl. Cowlstiomm Merlct NnN Ma fM eevuM x~E nwtaw nnlrwn IMebt swgoxtl tM Inewr Irentq• N1auM N on1Y tM M11dMle grwN sMUld M LNaopN •M sort eM vu w tM wu K tM omrwn mould nee e• .ewlntl. 01n Colxm, Smlpr plxmt, tLxtl tole ell <M IeMKeplry erU rK 1Mexe +I[nm tM [dinns rlgnt-a-rq eN raid rpgyfrt in-I1m tees exam :eltttns ors no< wworw a ratter AMSapUp pl ln. loss nqu Ve, CItY Ergimlr, fg9nde [ne Cow MSlon dully lM policy repul ring ItMxlplrp frw tM pnpVtY I1M Lp tM flat roter•y, Mt1tn mould oe tM pnaW. M hlt tM in-ltq fxt Could rte rypulrtp m <M PopptY u dmlowd pY nevlq tM dewlomm IlMfctw or ply In-01q lnf for tM upvp wrtlon fM< N eMn, Ioilwiq e1tnl Mtlpn of tM pn!n, lM dKaoper cwld cegl.n pexlopwnt •nd tt tort t1M Der In-Ilq hu or ItMfnw tM sxoN wrtlon v9 [M pVUI. [owNSfomm <Mtlee Wftlomd II tMn na t Mn•r alto Mlcp 1KIu1q tM nooa wnerel polo ee fM. Mr ma •vt <wltl p• emdpPa rIM Ppttlq .M :nal •nen aril retee +e .n tpelr P~annN ;e rte to e.p•mmn of eM pptiq ,. ~ntn tM ^pea cpnerm eum. mmlesientr Cn1ep1 rx cpxe etl tNt 1/ tM po rn net pltnmd propKiy veld nlrer dtniep tnd tM Llb rwld nerp ores tM LNUyIq. annlSn ~~er d sity su99ntN lM1LL IM -HN fm M Drppcr[laoetl :a :n1 tot danloMe,r sa tort In 1wrd+ntee tLS .Dula not M I•It rltn eM mm~t loo Lfln pet. :Mli t')n1. in~t•tf tc [vr-ve. CITY OF /~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: a~A~ OF Moo. TO DR BB-3 TITLE: P•c. MN~Es PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: ~.! Mr. Mqu1rc stated that belprc the applicant could mtain building penRS for tM first phase M would have to provide surety, guaranteeing that once Day Cre<k Chenml was completed, the developer would et inmate am f111 the basin. Once the basin was f911ed, it would be in tM developer's Konanic interest to utlHxe the laM for Oerkirg so that he could further expaM tM use of tM build[q. Brad Buller, [1ty Planner, suggested that [M Pl annirg Ca~tssl on was rcafft nniq exi sttq Dalicy to take tM landscapi rg to tM first roadway slag [M freeway right-of-vay, aM tnet in-H eu fees should M toll KLed proportionate to tM lane Miq developed. Rat ph Nanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated Mat tM natter was brought De/orc the Pl anniq Cosisiion t¢ appeal a C1ty Planner's decision to deny a coplete deletion of Me lainscapiq caMltton. He suggested the Comatiston make a motion to 5ustaln LM appeal and direct [M City Planner Lo maeM Lm <oinition conil stem with tM Cmwissi on's fi inings. Motion: Moved Dy Chi btea, femMed Dy Bl akesley, to sustain the appeal of tM City Pl anmr's dKtsion to deny tM reRUest far Minl/teatton to Developaent Review BB-32 aM direct the C1ty Planner [o aaein tM caMition mns/stent with the Lomaissi on's /linings. Motion carried by tM folloriq vote: AYES: COIMISS IDNERS: BLAKESLEY, CH ITI EA, FMERILK, NCMI EL, TOLSTOY NOES: CDNMISSIDNE0.S: HDRE ABSENT: CDMISS IDNERS: -carried CommlSSiamr Emer i<k felt tM policy should De more clearly delineated to allow tM land price to reflKt norc or less burden in tM area of 7 aMscapi rg. Cammissi ~~er Bl akesley greed that it should bn predictable. Mr. Nquirc stated M 01d not kmr of any other tong rete:tion Msi ns on private property along tM Irceway corridor. H< felt that a clarificatl on o/ tM policy rcqulrirq laMscapl ng aloq tM proDaty line up to tM first roadway was very predictable. xe stated tMS property was uni9ue Deuuse of :he retenH On basin and LM basin would be rMnved wttAin a year. Lhairman Nceiel inri tad Nr. Masan to <gament Mr. Mason stated that his client world only be develaoim one Mildim aM that although sane addttlpnal parking would De added to CM retention Dasin area when it becnae available, the renal Mar of [he retention basin land would be of no addtil onal Demtit to his cH ant. Choi roan NcNtel stated that bKnse Me additl onal lain wwtd be avail ebl e, tM owner would have Lhe ability to expaM h1s butidi,g aM/or Msl ness wi to [he developnent of addlttonal parkl ng. Me felt Loaf removl:g the raga lrement of lainscaDlq to tM west of tM an-ramp was rellevlq tM eppl scant cons lderably. Mr. Maguire suggested th! bal ant! of tM In-lieu fee be Gied t0 tM eliml nail on of the flood control Dasin instead of the Bevel opnent of that portl an of land. The PlanMq [ammisslon concurred. Mr. Buller ttatrd that he would work WILD tM developer aM aeeM tM condition to delete the regutranent for lainscapiq tM area west of tM on- ramo aM to at taw tM in-ilea lee to bs propprtlomh to tM aru of laM presently Ding da'mioped rlth CM realatntq portion of tM in-Heu fee Del!g due at the time the Dasin area ns requirM to De filled Oecuse tM flood control muure ras no lager neussary. The Bevel open could then expaM his parkiq aM further intensify me of tM Mildlnq. Masked Mr. Nanson Minn tM apDiicant's aPPeal Der1M Mould begl n. Mr, Nansan staled the apped period should begin tonight. CITY OF • • • • a ~~ ~ ITE1[: APPE/1L OF MOD. To DR 88-3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITW: P•~• ~TEg PLANNING DIVISION Ex~IBIT: D-2 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~~ 3 ~ O A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO MODIFY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRING PAYMENT OF AN IN-LIEU FEE FOR LANDSCAPING NTTHIN THE i-15 (DEVORE) FREENAY RIGHT-OF-NAY, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON 1.55 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 14) LOCATED ON HYSSOP DRIVE AND NORTH OF 4TH STREET. A. Recitals. (i) An application has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by John Nelson (hereinafter "applicant") for a Development Review for the development of an industrial bu11d1ng totaling 28,367 square feet on 1.55 acres of land on the east side of Hyssop Drive, north of 4th Street, hereinafter referred to as "the application". (11) On January 11, 1989, the City Planner conditionally approved Development Review No. 88-32 requiring payment of an in-lieu fee for landscaping along the freeway right-of-way prior to the issuance of ally building permits. (iii) On May 9, 1989, the applicant requested a modification to delete fbh ~nMtH nn ni a ,a1 in. . . nni n nn.wtr L..M 6L.n _..._ __.. _. .. _.. _. -•. -._. ._. .__-_... ... ._.......... ..... _. .~r (iv) On June 1, 1969, the City Planner denied the request to delete this condition as inconsistent with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-185. (v) The City Planner's denial was timely appealed to the Planning Commission on June 4, 1989. (vi) On June 14, 1989, the Pianning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal and concluded said hearing on that date with a motion to direct the City Planner to modify the condition of approval to clarify the limits of landscaping and the relationship to the removal of a retention basin. (viii On June 19, 1989, the City Planner mn tlifled the COAdi tf On a5 directed by the Commission. (viii) The Pianning Commission's action was timely appeased to this Council on June 21, 1989. ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUFION N0. MODIFICATION TO DR 88-32 - NELSON July 19, 1989 Page 2 B. Resolution. NON, TNEREFDRE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on July 19, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the end of Hyssop Drive with a street frontage of 1132 feet and lot depth of 1227 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the sub,)ect site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of the City of Ontario, the property to Lhe east is Day Creek Channel and the property to the west is the I-15 (Devore) Freeway; and (c) New development along the 1-15 (Devore) Freeway corridor has been conditioned to Install landscaping or pay in-lieu fees; and (d) The current policy applies universally to alt properties which ad,)oin the freeway right-of-way. , _. ,c, Si tc ii ui~i yuc iii tip icy pcct tJ tiic iat;u ui i/ddndy ii u,i l.d jc to the size of building because of the unusual elongated shape of the property and the fact that the property abuts a northbound on and off ramp. (f) The applicant had full knowledge and disclosure of the recommended condition prior to the City Planner's approval of the application. (g) The the applicant made no attempt to timely appeal the condition fallowing the City Planner's approval. (h) The City Planner, at the request of the Planning Conmission, has modified the condition for freeway landscaping, thereby reducing the landscaped area from approximately eight acres to one and one-half acres and that payment of approximately half of the one and one-half acres has been deferred until completion of the applicant's two-phased pro,)ect. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Counctt during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the deletion of the condition for landscaping would not be consistent with City policy; and ~~9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. MODIFICATION TO DR 88-32 - NELSON duly 19, 1989 Page 3 (b) That the deletion of the condition for landscaping would not be consistent with the ob!ectives of the General Plar.; and (c) The granting of the appeal would not be consistent with the City's goal of providing needed screening and aesthetic improvement along the I-15 (Devore) Freeway; and (d) That the condition for payment to instail the landscaping is not unreasonable nor Inequitably applied to properties which abut the I-15 (Devore) freeway; and 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions yet forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 150 ~} ~~A Qh~ X51_ j~5 ~lan+5 ~.si- ass CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Krout11, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMSSION DECISION TO DENY VARIANCE 89-04 reques o gra a an pave approx ma e y acres o an and a request to reduce the parking setback from 25 feet to 8 feet and the landscape setback from 35 feet to 8 feet in the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard, between Utica and Nncent Avenue - APN: 209-143-07, 08, 09 I. RECOiMENDATION: Approval of the attached Resolutions of Denial or o er appropr a direction. II. BACKGROUND: At the June 21, 1989 meeting, the City Cou~il held a eater nTg on this appeal. At the close of the hearing, the Council determined that the findings required for the granting of a Va ri a,ve rnnlA nM ho weAe anA nnh elA •he Dl _n nlw~ rnw.wlrN ne ._. ._..__ ___._ __ _.._ _r.. _._ ...- .-......--.-.. decision, Staff was requested to prepare Resolutions of Denial for Council action for both the Variance and the associated Minor Development Review. These Resolutions of Denial were presented for City Council action on July 5th. The same day, the appellant submitted a letter (see Exhibit "A"), restating their position. At the appellant's request, the items were pulled off the Consent Caiendar and continued for two weeks far possible additional discussion on July 19. III. OPTIONS AND LEGAL LIMITATIONS: Dl ease note that the public ear ng was c ose on une The City Attorney has advised staff that no further testinany can be taken from either side unless a new, properly noticed and advertised public hearing is scheduled. fie Council may wish to discuss the matter further to decide whether the hearing should be reopened and the appeal reconsidered. If so, staff should be instructed to advertise a new hearing and the Ttems should be continued for four weeks. This would ailaw sufficient time to meet newspaper advertising deadlines. 15 (o CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: VA 89-04 8 MDR 87-71 July 19, 1989 Page 2 Should the Council decide nat to reopen the hearing, approval of the attached Resolutions of Deniai would be appropriate. Res fu s d eul Ci t BB:q(:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appellant's Letter Resolutions of Denial 157 ~3ABELe COOK dl BECKLUND Civil Engineering • Surveying • Structures • Environmental • Planning 5 July 1989 City of Aaocho Cueawsgs Peat Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Cslilotnia' 91730 Attn: City Clerk Ae: City Council seating of 5 July 1989 Ninor Developswt Mvietr No. 87-71 Yariaaee No. 89-01 Dear City Council, On behslt of our client, Coueseial Carriers, we •ould respectfully request [hat the sbova retennced itns he Dulled Iron the convent ealsddar and De Drought back for another City Council uetisg to Further discuu this cue due to new infonation tbat vs: not available at the Couoeil uetiop of Juae 21, 1989. I have prepared tour exhibits that delineate Couercial Carriers' options concerning this site. They are as lollovs: CossercaA Circlets could bnax up the exlsting dust control Raving and thsrsby Vold the Cpndit ions of ADDroval of MDA 87-71 because then sae ao Droject proposed other than the paving. Additionally, there would ba no storage Dersitted vithin the front 120' set back line. Latiutad coat to break up existing pavnent $5,000 Cue II: Lxistins Conditions tdth Screen Ya11 CosKrueted This case is Case I along eitA the construction o! the nquired 8 toot screen wall along Jersey Boulevard, trAicA !s ao "over the counter" building persit. Tha construction of this vall will alloe storage eithin the 120 Loot setback area. Estiuted cost: Break uD exieidg Dsveseat $$,066 Screen wall 600 L.F. • $SO/L.y. $70,000 Total cost 915,000 ~~~ ~ / / ~M 6U North Main Street, Suite 1•B, Rivvtkle, CaliF. 92501 Tebphons (7U) 789-8092 Paps two Couerieal Carriers 5 July 1989 Care III: proiact a tohrittad far Variance 69-0{ This case ru the eorprosdse that was worked out with staff that would allow the txisting Davinq to rarain along wi to proridinp landreapiag and sereeen wall constructioo acrou portiora of the sib. Thir plan allowed the existing parking to raisin easterly of the uin driveway, Dut provided additional laadscaDig9 to screen the parkiaq areas. This plan also provided storspe i0 the front 120 Loot set back and does not disrupt the existing office area. Eatirated cost: Screen wall $600 ~ SSO/lf $10,000 Landscaping 16,000 rf f $3.00/r[ • S{8,000 Total Cost 378,000 Cau IY: Tfiia case requires the total reeonatruction of the oft ice Darkinq and entrance, iastallat ion of landscaping aqd eonatructioq o! the acrarq wall. This plan disrupts the existing olLiee operation sad reduces the arount of storage area. Estirated cost: Screen wall 5600 ~ SSO/Ly $ 30,000 Landscaping 16,000 of • $3.00/s! S {8,000 Parking Lot 16,000 st • $3.50/at • $126.000 Total Copt 3237,000 Couercial Carriers his and is still w1111np to corply with tea eondieroas requsrwa Dy ,Cue III which ^llowa the existing paving to raisin, but Drovidu a aubatantial up-grade to the avpearancv of this sib iron Jersey Blvd., while liri ti ng the construction cosh to a unaggDla uougt for the existing rite. However, it is Couercial Carriers position that the requirarenta iaporad Dy Caae IV are excessive in light of the riairal wark dope in paving this site for duet control. Therefore, if their request for Variance 89-Od ie denied, then the only option that is left it Caae I or II, which will uint sin the axiatinq conditions along Jersey Blvd. Thank you !or your conridwration iq this ratter. It you have any questions or require additional inloaatioo, pluu do hot hasitab to tall, Respectfully, Cabal, Cook { Becklund, Inc. Grant Beckluhd Civil Engineer Enclowrer ~ ~n N J 0 } ~-- 6 m J a a Z n a k Z 4, i m } W W 7 T / J LL Q a `~ ~ w 2 u J a ~~ ~w r, 1~ Y ~~ ~~~ ~~~ M Y11wV f~ll pMY' Z~ 1 m z d ~~~ tNo 0 ~ ~~/YY~S 1f°~I LL 2 9 8 ZZ K O ~~~ °$ U ~3 ~a ~~~ ~~~~LL Z 9~~ ayo, H O JO fn .~ Z^~, ~ (CAl w hN O77 Wo ~fU ~a ~~ g~ a ~~~~~~ v -,; . m -~ r S Ot Z W S ~4 :L ~ i~ 1 a3 .. w w 5 w NNW d Z E G W qU 2 ' Q O ~ 9 & o z w w J o ~~~I w ~ d J '3 V ~ Q U N ~ ~ f O u ~ N W8 g ; ,A r~ /-~ , J I I q Ls~ Z ,~~. t w w ~~ i u X33= ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ „4 o - ~ ~ ~ " ~ - 3 ~z~ o ~~ ~ ~- z ~~~ ~g~ x ~ ° g3 d~u ~1-- w ~,~ i=~Wa~ `duo p`9` ~dao 11 U ~i /// .~ z Jd~ day J ~ ~ JZ WCI `° ~ i w3~a~s_P N / ~ = N A V ~^1 ~ w w p. ~ ,`' ~ a Vuf 4 4 Q ~ 1'' 1 4 J ~ . ; i ~{'1~ .V n; ., 1 i s ~ m ~g W z i J y W i~ , a ~ o m ~' `.~ ~ -~ d ~ ~ ~ ~, _~ ... F _Z~ ~ z 1 ~ ~,y*~~ `W y\R ,~ 4 ICY Y ~ ~ I I .. • , ~~ 5 2~ ~~ ~: ,~ a~ I\ G W tl a j tl i~~a~ z w of ~I~~ w W, ~ a v° ~ a~ N J ~ ~ m ~ N Q ~ ~ ' ug rA Z, ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~J-_ ~ I J ~ m J J Z V 0 ~4 W - l ~ ~ w r 1 1 S S~ 6 i _. - =-~ 4 - I_~ W O w yH~ i ~ ~ t0~ ~ '~sw ~~ ~ ~, $a ! z i CPw °~ ~w4 w Y ~~ a UJ Z v ~q~4 W ~a QQ ~ 9dy, ~ ~~ ya Ga ~ oor ~ 1 O y o o~ m ~ a° 3 ~~~ ~0 iz~dk ~~ 0_~ ~~a~~ .~ o Q N JI h U \~~+ ~' a a w a r ~ d ~ a ~, i ~ a W l ~ w u z ~ ~ J ~ qvq ~ ~ 8 0 n F7 fol fl f~ ~~~~ -~- - z ~ ~ J ~ a ~~ ~, ~ ~ W. n ~ ~ N p V ~ ~ Z G ~ o ' r v ~ N W OZ ei W N ~ N / ~ t` Y ~~ UQ j A•^ 11 i~~ra.e 'LKI•r fr7 _? I ~~~'I m J Q a J Y a e aL 2F E~ 7 m ~,-- o p ['- o ~' V ~~ !] O d o u ~ Z ~ LL LL •. i~ y d o J i~~ J d p p y G ~ ~ W~ ~ y V 3 y u ,~ 1L w °~ 1~`~J ~FFO ~~i ~~ ~' ~ 4~ ~ ~~~Faa a . 3 yr u tl I ... ~T a N a~ ~ @~o A a i ~w ~ ~hko ' V I X 1 1 I i I°V J ~~;~ ~a WyNWy w a ~tl ~~ 7~n~dk tcd + " N ?~~a9o U - a ri ~{. ~. ~a u W a Z G ~ G _ L ~ ~ tl ~8~~ + ol ~~~ -- W ' i, - N ~ `~7 i W ' ` ' 6 , *, i ~~p ! ~ ~ r i d 2 W~ &1 ~ Z ; a p L~ Nl ~ y J U N \ ~ X Q ~' i n d 9 -~ ~ ~ _ I ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~- 3/ /~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING VARIANCE N0. 89-04 TO REDUCE THE PARKING SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 8 FEET AND REDUCE THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 8 FEET FOR 12 ACRES OF LANG LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF JERSEY BOULEVARD BETNEEN UTICA AND VINCENT AVENUES IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9), AND MRKIN6 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-143,-07, O8, 09 A. Recitals. (i) Commercial Carriers has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 89-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the applfcation". (ii) On April 26, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 10, 1989. (ifi) On May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission denied the application on the basis that the required flMings could not 6e made. (iv) The Plannt~ Commission's denial was appealed to the City Council and on June 21, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pu611c hearing on the application. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurrea. B. Resolution. HON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 21, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: l~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. RE: VA 89-04 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS July 5, 1989 Page 2 (a) The application applies to property located at 10807 Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth of 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse, and parking lot; and (b) The property to the north of the subtect site is multi- tenant industrial, the property to the south of that site consists of a warehouse, the property Co the east is vacant, and tfie property to the west is a warehouse; and (c) The application applies to a site that is currently improved with an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is considered a legal non-conforming lot; and (d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.0208 authorizes the Gity Planner to impose reasonable condittons upon a Minor Development Review permit approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements, regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and (e) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020A states that the purpose ar~d intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that such limited protects comply with all applicable City Standards and Ordinances; and (f) The site plan submitted in contunction with the application, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot average landscape setoack ono minimum ~~-iooi parking seiuack, as meaau reJ from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain link fence improvements da not meet the Industrial Spec if lc Plan standards for screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage with mascnry, concrete or other similar materials; and (g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within 820 feet of street frontage. The City's access policy for arterial streets specifies that driveways on the same side of a sheet be spaced 300 feet apart. Therefore, only Mo driveways would be allowed on this site. Further, driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left-turn movements. The City's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum 100 feet from intersections. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: /~P~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. RE: Vp 89-04 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS July 5, 1989 Page 3 (a) That strict or literal Interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the ob~ecttves of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the scone district. (d) That the granting of the Variance would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or tmprovements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, L, aOU Q aYYVt, L111a WYIILII IICI CUj u'ciiica t~c uyYiiCu i0i.. 5. The City Cterk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. /~~ RESOLUTION N0. l( ~ - 3 l 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEM M0. 81-71, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE I NOUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS tN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-143-01, O8, 09 A. Recitals. (i) Commercial Carriers has filed an application for the approval of Minor Development Review No. 87-71 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,lect Development Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 26th of April 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduted a meeting on the application and continued said meeting to May 10, 1969. (iii) On May 10, 1989, the Planning Commission dented the application. (iv) The Planning Commission's dental was appealed to the City Council and on June 21, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on June 21, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10801 Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet aM an average lot depth of 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse and parking lot; and /~/ CITY COUNC;L RESOLUTION N0. RE: MDR 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS duly 5, 1989 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is multi- tenant industrial park, the property to the south of that site consists of a warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is a warehouse; and (c) The application applies to a site that is currently improved with an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is considered a legal non-conformtrg lot; and (d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.0208 authorizes the Ctty Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Development Review permit approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements, regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment of development schedules ar time limits for performance or completion; and (e) Municipal Code Section 11.06.020.A states that the purpose and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and Ordinances; and (f) The site plan submitted in conJunction with the application, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot average landscape setback and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as measured from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain link fence improvements do not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage 1,1411 IIIpi Vlll ), 1V111.I C4C VI V411i1 illl lllpl IXp 4<I Ip i, YIW (g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within 820 Peet of street frontage. The City's access policy for arterial streets specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced no less than 300 feet apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this site. Further, driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left-turn movements. The City's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum 100 feet from intersect tons. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not cansfstent with the o6Jecttves of the General Plan; and l~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RE: NDR 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS July 5, 1989 Page 3 (b) Thal the proposed use is not in accord with the ob~ettive of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (t) That the proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Cade; aM (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions aDPlicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public healtA, safety, or welfare, or materially in3urious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the application. ~^~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 1989 TC: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jack Lem, AICP, City Maneger sueoecT: s o s AttacAad Ls the Lnformation regarding the propoaad county-wld~ ballot meaeurw. sAMBAG eteff will Do pHaent io ma][a a pr~eantation to the council. JL:jle G Gl'1'Y VN' HANGHV GUUAMVNGA MEMORANDUM GATE: July 12, 1989 T0: Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer SUBJECT: New County Nide 1/2 cent Transport on P gram The 1981 Measure A Improvement Program was a f900 million, 15 year roads and highway program. The program had three basic facets, State freeways and highways, arterial highways, and local roads. The main item in the State freeways and highways portion of the program was the completion of the Route 30 Foothill Freeway and Lhe Ctty was to receive approximately f640,000 annual from each of the arterial highways and local roads portions of the Drogram. The new 1989 1/2 Cent Transportation Improvement Program is a 51.658 billion, 20 year transportation plan. This plan continues to have the same basic roads and highways program included. The State freeways and highways DortTon continues to be the main emphasis including the completion of the Route 30 Foothill Freeway. However, this position of the program has been expanded to encompass various other projects including the widening of the San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate 10) southerly of the City. Also, the arterial highways and local roads portion of the program is still included, but has been expanded with a yussiuiiiiy ui ii~e ~iiy receiviny uver i4v hti iiiuo urer Lim iiie ui Lim program. Finally, the program has been expanded to include three new areas of service. The first is 5100 million for the San Bernardino - Los Angeles, and the San Bernardino - Riverside - Orange County commuter rail program. Second, f75 million for senior and handicapped transit fares discounts and service enhancements. And finally, f25 million for traffic management and environmental enhancement programs including corridor greenbelts, HOV inducements, trails, alternate fuels, etc. Overall, the program is substantially the basic 1987 Measure A with additional items added to reflect the successful Riverside County Transportation Program. RHM:dIw Attachment 17~ The San es,nabnw courn irereportesoa oommtaskn SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GO1IERNMENTS A PIJ~NNIN6 COUNCIL OF COOP9URING INn5RNC1NE OOVERNMENfS 444 Notts ArroWlMed Mrenu0. Suits 101 Sen Bemer~n0. Celiionlis 92101 (!14) 881.828 Fax Cn41 e95-440 July 6, 1989 To: Mayors, City Clerks, and City Managers ce: SANBAG Representative Subject: Transportation Improvement Program On July 5, SANBAG set in motion the final steps leading to a November vote on the Revised Transportation Improvement Program funded by a one-half cent sales tax increase. In this action, SANBAG approved for circulation the Expenditure Plan. Under. enabling law, we now must secure during the month of July approvals of the plan only from a majority of cities representing a majority of the incorporated population, plus the Board of Supervisors. Our deadline is Avguat 1. We ask your assistance in scheduling the attached Resolution, or your own version thereof, at the earliest possible City Council meeting. SANBAG staff will be pleased to attend and explain. Tiro - "..' ~i _1a eh n_.lA hn la~naly RPIf-P.xDlanatOrV. Basically, wit follows the form of our 1987 effort with the following improvements: * A 20 year term (versus the earlier 15 years) generates significantly more revenue, thus allowing addition of several major new freeway projects * Afldition of commuter rail, elderly and handicapped transit, and environmental enhancement components * A much stronger and refined return-to-source program for the mountain-desert area Please contact us with any questions, and respond with scheduling da*_es erpedirio~.ls7Y. Sincerely, ~r,~Qi~~~~,,~~ Wesley C. McDaniel Execu ive Director . CL-89-377 i ~~ ... . .... .....................~...~. __..._ ____...~ ........ ..~.. ~ ~... ~...w ....,.m~ nio ucrm a* PROPOSED SANBAG Proposed Transportation Improvement Program Line Amount Program 1 1.658 Billion Total Funds Available 2 (.091) Billion (Less 19 Admin + 1.59 BOE Collection) 3 1.617 Billion Total Available For Plan 4 ~328I Billion Mountain-Desert Share (Plus 70 Million STIP) 5 1.289 Billion Total For San Bernardino valley SAN HERNAADINO VALLEY PR06RAN 6 690 Million State Fxy/Hwy/IC/Corridor/Contingencies 7 780 Construction 8 190 Engineering 9 50 Interchanges/Corridors/park i ride 10 50 Contingencies 12 1,070 Subtotal 13 (230) STIP Forecast (federal/state funds) ie (1001 Develouer Financing 15 690 Sales Tax Needs 16 250 Million Local Projects 17 150 Million Major Streets 18 100 Million Commuter Rail 19 ~ 75 Million Elderly s Handicapped Transit, including Senior Fares 20 25 Million Traffic Management Implementation and Environmental Enhancement Program 6/30/89 revised 173 PROPOSED SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY PROJECTS Route Seameat aad Proiaat Daaoziptioa Amount (1989 S'sI I-10 State Route 30 to Yucaipa Blvd. S10' Million Widen One Lane Each Direction (possible HOV) I-10 Los Angeles County Line to I-15 .580 Million Widen One Lane Each Direction (HOV) I-715 I-10 to State Route 30 $100 Million Widen One Lane Each Direction; reconstruct interchanges (Possible HOV) I-215 Riverside County line to I-30 $75 Million Widen one Lane Each Direction (HOV) SR 30 L.A. County Line to I-215 $400 Million Construct Six Lane Freeway (include HOV) (plus $150 mil. L.A.) SR 60 L.A. County Line to Riv. County Line $25 Million Widen One Lane Each Direction (possible HOV) , SR 71 Riv. County Line to L.A. County line $90 Million Const=uct Six Lane Fzeeway (include possible HOV) Total $780 Million (Plus advance construction of projects in STIP and subject to delay: SR 30 East, SR 60/71 interchange, etc.) 6/30/89 revised l7~ Assumptions/Explanation Line 1 20 yrs at 5$ true growth (inflation not included); first year starts at S50 million 2 required by law and BOE (current) 4 Mountain-desert return-to-source, equivalent percent of STIP available for program projects 5 total available for valley 6 see lines 7 - 15 7 see separate listing of projects (1989 costs) 8 engineering and project development at 25$ 9 Program for interchange revisions and corridor preservation 10 contingency for added projects or cost increases 13 80$ of STIP funds available for program projects (20$ on line 4) 14 conservative estimate of new development Financing 16 distribution by Population to cities and county (for unincorporated) for local needs 17 arterial/major streets program administered by SAHBAG 18 San Bernardino's share of Los Angeles Commuter rail and San Bernardino - Riverside - Orange County ccmmuter rail, to be supplemented by any state or bond program; plus possible short line development within county 19 for program of discounted senior and handicapped fares and transit service enhancements for seniors and handicapped 20 implementation of traffic management program and environmental enhancement program including corridor greenbelts, HOV inducements, bike and pedeatrlan tralla, open space plan development, and air quality-related inducements including alternate fuel vehicle programs 6/30/89 revised SAN BHRIll1RDIN0 CDOIiTIC ONE HALF CENT SALES TA% INITIATIVE TRAFFIC la11IAGEMENT PLAN The cities or county must adopt a Transportation Management Plan that would include the following: 1. A twenty year projected plan and a five-year Transportation Improvement Plan for their jurisdiction which would identify proposed capital improvement projects by priority, adopt traffic level of service goals for the agency, and complete a traffic study/model for the community. The local transportation plans are to be coordinated and consistent with Transportation Plans adopted by SANBAG. 2. The local agency must adopt a development financing mechanism that would require all future development to pay for needed transportation facilities as a result of the development. 3. Local plans funded under this program should place emphasis and yive priority to improving traffic level of service on existing streets and roads prior to funding new development needs. d. T.n~al nlana ahnnl,l clan intaarate to reninnal nlana anA requirements and should consider growth policies, job-housing balance, and air quality goals. Revised 6/15 Wes McDaniel I ` DRAFT RAIL LAWGDA6& Commuter rail expenditures shall include: Purchase or other preservation of rail rights of way for transportation purposes, with specific focus upon; the San Bernardino - West Valley - Los Angeles corridor the San Bernardino - Riverside - Orange County corridor "short lines" and linkages within San Bernardino County Development of a comprehensive rail transit plan, including consideration of a possible West Valley - Orange County corridor Upon positive findings by an independent consultant or agency of cost efficiency and service effectiveness, adopted by a two- thirds vote of SANBAG, excepting the Mountain-Desert members, expenditures may also include: Track, station, signal and other improvements Acquisition or lease of equipment Securing track usage rigncs ou nuu-u"ucu lacks as nc..c....ar; Actual operation, preferably by private contract, of commuter rail operations Expenditures related to the "Aerobus" or other non- automotive transportation system from the Valley to the mountains Commuter rail funding from state and federal sources shall aggressively be sought. Local program funds which may be found to be in excess of need from Cime to time may be transferred to the transit category for use in commuter transportation. 6/15 revised Wes McDaniel (77 San Bernardino Covnty Valley Area Local and Arterial Programs 20 Year Estimate 20 Yr. 20 Yr. (1) 20 Yr. (1) 1st Yr. Local $•s Art. $•s Total Local Chino 515,125,358 $9,075,215 $24,200,572 $455,990 Colton $10,048,482 $6,029,089 516,077,571 $302,936 Fontana $20,779,478 $12,467,687 $33,247,164 $626,447 Grand Terrace $2,893,952 $1,736,371 $4,630,326 $87,245 Highland $7,149,733 $4,289,840 $11,439,573 $215,546 Lona Linda $3,714,780 $2,225,868 $5,943,669 $111,991 Montclair $6,876,301 $4,125,781 $11,002,082 $207,303 Ontario $33,115,618 $19,869,371 $52,984,990 $998,350 Rancho Cucaaonga $27,910,022 $16,746,013 $46,656,036 $841,415 Redlands $15,945,653 $9,567,392 $25,513,064 $480,720 Rialto $17,139,584 $10,283,751 $27,423,335 $516,714 San Bernardino $40,950,796 $24,570,478 $65,521,274 $1,234,560 Opland $17,042,311 $10,225,387 $27,267,698 $513,781 (Yucaipa) $15,457,153 $9,274,292 $24,731,445 $465,993 SBdo. Co. $15,850,778 $9,510,467 $25,361,244 $477,860 $250,000,000 $150,000,000 $400,000,000 $7,536,850 (1) Programming of Arterial Funds is not based on population, but pre- sumably would be proportionate over the twenty year life of the measure. 07/04/89 r 7~' Proposed ballot lsngnage (to be refined and reduced):' For the purpose of achieving traffic relief NOW, meeting highway, rail, and Senior transit needs, increasing safety, and improving air quality by providing essential countywide transportation improvements, including: 1. Construction of the Foothill Freeway (Route 30), the Route 71 Corona Freeway, and reconstruction and widening of 1-215 through San Bernardino; 2. Provision of cosC-effective commuter rail service to Los Angeles and Orange Counties; 3. Providing increased transit service and guaranteeing reduced fares £or seniors and the handicapped; 4. Assuring that all tax money raised in the mountain-desert area shall he spent only on projects in cnat area, ue~niwiucu by representatives from that area; 5. Widening I-10, I-215, and Route 60; 6. Increased safety anfl traffic capacity through improvement, resurfacing, and improved maintenance of local streets and roads in each city and in unincorporated areas; 7. Assuring acceptable traffic levels through a comprehensive plan; 8. Requiring that new development pays its fair share; 9. Improving quality of life by improvements such as landscaping, sound walls, bike trails, and open space planning shall the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission be authorized to establish by Ordinance No. A a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax for a period not to exceed twenty years, to be used solely for transportation improvements, establish an appropriations limit for the Commission of $250,000,000 and be authorized to issue limited tax bonds not to exceed in aggregate principle at any one time in the amount outstanding of S500,000,000 to fund improvements consistent with the Expenditure Blan? YES 0 NO Revised 6/15 Wes McDaniel l80 RESOLUTION NO. / ~~ V" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF , CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS the City Council of the City of finds that a need exists to provide for future revenue sources to fund transportation improvements throughout the City of and the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS a proposed sales tax initiative to fund transportation improvements within San Bernardino County has been developed by the San Bernardino Associated Governments with representation by all cities and the Board of Supervisors; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the l.lty Oi _ , CaiiiV~ula, uGoo ay~r GL"c u.2 ~.r JyJotd Transportation Improvement Program Expenditure Plan for distributing and administering any future revenues of San Bernardino County generated by the proposed half-cent sales tax initiative, and urges that the measure be placed on the ballot in November of 1989 for consideration by the voters of San Bernardino County. A2PR0...., a.^.3 ADOPTED thi day of 1959. ~~1 - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: To: From: Subject: July 19, 1989 ~p ~~MO'~c ~~C` 9 ~~ ~' h,', ~ ID 197 Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager The Establishment of Appropriate Standards for the Development of Necessary Public Facilities --- Growth Management Report - Item 13 It is staff recommendation that the following Facility Standards be adopted for public facilities within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and direct etaYP to develop an implamertation plan for these capital prof acts in a report titled "Parks and Recreation Plan: 1990-2010". Using the information gathered in the Park and Recreation Facilities Review Task Force Report doted February 15, 1989, along with an understanding of existing level of recreation __~.i __ _ _1____ ___ia__ _ __ ,it.. _ __ __ _ _ :-i,o bi - -~ i been fleveloped4forysome~recreation~areas.l+FacilityySianflards are standards for the quantity oP facilities which should be provided in any point in time to meet the needs of residents. The expression is generally a format oP "one facility per so many thousands oP population". These facility standards will serve as guidelines for the level of service the City should provide as population grows. Generally, the recommended facility standard is based on an assumption of maintaining the existing ratio of facilities to population. In some cases, the National Standard is higher than what Rancho Cucamonga is contemplating. It is proposed that the City adjust the National Standards for demographics and actual needs/use in its service of those areas, particularly where demand is stronger than current supply. I will highlight conclusions from the reBearah report on needs. Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood and Community parka are receiving a very high level oP use within all areas of each park including athletic fields, picnic areas, and general passive areas. Rancho Cucamonga residents currently experience n high level of service and the expectation ie that Growth Management Report Jtlly 19, 1989 Page Two From statistics gathered Prom the County oP San Bernardino we know that based on an average expected annual growth in population of 4,423 persons per year; and a standard of 5 acres/1,000 residents, in the year 2010, (buildout of the community) 900 total acres oP community park land will be required. This assumes a population of 180,000 in 2010. We currently have 150 acres that are improved; 750 new acres will have to ba improved to meet our goal of 900 scree. We currently have 193 acres that are owned but unimproved; and wa will have to purchase another 557 acres for development to meet our 900 acre goal in the year 2010. Agreements with schools for long-term uea can reduce this acreage requirement. • Sport Pacilities should be developed quickly to meet the adult and youth demands; either thru acquisition of land and development or improvements of existing school facilities. • Demands from sport teams, particularly in the evening, are placing the current system at its limit. • In addition to the demand for piayfields, we have found out through the Needs Assessment Study that we have a family orientated population and there is a desire for more passive recreation facilities, including natural areas, walking and bicycling trails, picnic areas and playgrounds. • The most popular community eervices include programs Por adult and youth sports, genarel recreation programs, early childhood classes, playechool, fitness and senior programs. X83 Growth Management Report ,7uly 19, 1989 Page Three The goals and direction of the Community Services Department are the foundation for developing the City Park and Recreation System. These can be summarized as follows: Maximization of available funds and resources. Providing the broad spectrum of recreational opportunities. Continuing dedication requirements for developers. Cost effective and quality development and maintenance. Implement programs/services which generate revenue. Investigate revenue souraas for long term maintenance needs. ANALYSIS' A summary of the needs assessment is contained in attachment (A). A count of existing city and school facilities is listed in the first two columns. City standards are based on National Recreation and Park Association Standards which have been adjusted Por demographics and program experience which are specific to the City. Using the information gathered in this research, along with an understanding of the existing level of recreation service experienced by the residents. facilities standards have harm developed for those areas which had none before within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Attached to this report labeled attachment (H) are Community Facility Standards. Facility Standards have been accepted by City Council that pertain to the public facilities identified in the committee report dated February 15, 1989. These facilities are: amphitheater, community centers, swimming competitive pools, fine arts center, golf and golf driving range, gymnasiums, natural areas, trails, performing arts, senior center/services, youth/teen centers, active and passive sports needs (football, baseball, soccer, basketball, swimming, jogging, fishing etc.) Several £acilitiea cited by the needs assessment task force can be classified as special community Pac111ties or amenities but have no National Recreation and Parks Standards. These fncilitiea are usually included in cities as the demand dictates. These are facilities not necessary or mandatory at community parks, but their provision would make the park and recreation system unique to the community and special to its users. /~~ Growth Management Report July 19, 1989 Page Four Listed below are some potential amenities that can be classified as educational/cultural components within a park system. A. Library B. Computer Center C. Occupational/Vocational Training Facility D. Arboretum E. Nature Center F. Petting Zoo G. Museum N. Children's Museum I. Historical Artifacts/Storage J. Time Capsule The community multi-use facility components that may be included within a park system are: A. Community Auditorium B. Emergency Shelters C. Facilities for Rent for reaidente' Uae Banquet Facilitiea...COnference Capabilities Most of these amenities are specialized but might be able to be incorporated, if appropriate, at designated community parks. For instance, the provision of an arboretum/nature center could be incorporated into the proposed open space park near the "Bog" area. The development of a museum/children's museum, central library and computer center would be very beneficial to the community. With Rancho Cucamonga's proximity to world class facilities in the Los Angeles area, it would be important that the facilities be unique to Rancho Cucamonga. As you know, we are anticipating a new library to be built within the Central Park; and while no state standards exist for the number of libraries within a community, there are standards about number oP volumes that should be available to the reaidente. The new library located in Central Park is planned to accommodate 250,000 volumes. Based on research I have seen, the total valumea oP 270-275 thousand (New Central Park Library, existing library and proposed library in N,E. EtiwandaJ meats the minimum standard of volumes per population Por a projected population of 180,000. Outdoor public art that supports or encourages civic pride and awareness could be incorporated into the design of community park facilities. Tho art could be integrated into the design for the appropriate facility, probably in the open space area. Public art may not ba appropriate at all parka, but could be considered at those parka that are moat visible to the public as a means r,P identifying "Rancho Cucamonga and Its community Park system"'. ~ ~ / Growth Management Report July 19, 1989 Page Five Informal camping areas to bs uaed, raBerved and supervised by organized groups could ba included at some perk facilities in the arena designated for open space, group picnic, or appropriate natural areas if not environmentally sensitive. The area would be nothing more than lawn area, with barbecues, amphitheater and restroome nearby. Facilities like fire rings or cabins are neither necessary for an overnight caap-out nor appropriate in a community park. Roller skating can be accommodated at the community parka by utilizing the walking/jogging trails and unoccupied court facilities and perking lots. In summary, many of the facilities, where no national standards or guidelines exist for public facilities, can ba incorporated into existing coffiunity parks and/or facilities. (i.e.) a library housing a computer center; or a community center with display windows housing many artifacts that are unique to our area with monthly displnys. Upon your acceptance of standards outlined in attachment (A) and (B), a plan will ba developed outlining approximate costs and an implementation plan for capital projects; that might appropriately be titled, ^PARlG9 AND RECREATION PLAN 1990- 2010. Respect/f~ur~~~+ll//~Jy submitted, Joe Sc uh ltz,~ Community se i as Manager JS:ba I ~/ ~, C ~ ?~ ~ ~ ~I ~ a 4 ~~ :, ~~ a r y ~ ~~ a ~~ ,~> ~) 1 ~ - a i~ nQ~ P4 ~ F F ~~ ~~ ~~ 0 p 0 0 O o D 0 4 `~ 0 0 i~ ~ O 0 ~- 0 0 0 0 0 p ~ 0 ~~ ~~ a ~ g g ~ ~ ~ a o i ,~ o ~ a~ r { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ L ~ L P ~ ~ ~ @ /, 7 Attachment "A" ~ ~ a ~ ~ u ~ 4 J !u V g ~i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C '~ C ~ ~ N A ~ 3 ~ ~ ~~ - - ~ ~ o V J 0 'o - s ~ 0 o O o c~ ~ ~ s U jo Fo ~6 ~o ~' !d 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 ~F ' N 0 ~ ~a a i U U ~ R s 3~0 ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ 3t~ ~ e~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ i 1 ~° ~ o ~ u ~ - ~ Ij ~ h L ~0 ~ N ~ ~ 0 ~ F ~ ~~~ L ~ N pl w ~c 1 l~ ~~ Attachment "A" o `~ OD ~1 ~ !+~ >! b V {~ If 'J ~ ~ ~~ ZZ.. ~ C [cc ~ ~ `$~ n k ~ ~ 4 - I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1F ~ ~ ~ ~ a S r ~ ~ ~ ^r ~ ~ o + i. "~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y -( P I ~ Y ~ ~ Q 0 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~ ~ ~ )` ~ ~ A ' ~ A J a egg ~ s ~ ~ i ~ I ~ o ~ I $ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I J ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ x.11 - _ - ,~ 0~~ ~' s j ~ \ ~ ~ R ~ V 4 ' 2 ~ ~ R k ~ R J ~' 8~ Attachment "A" ~ 4 ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Zy 1 ~ 6 ~_ ~ C n r k A~ N N~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ o' ~x ~-~ 4 ~ (M N (/1 x 6 ~~ ~ ~~ t ~ ~p ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 3 5 p~ p L ~/ [ i2 Z ~~ i C ~h1 ~ ~ ~ l~ uTn) U 7 ~o P.ttachment "A" ATTACHMENT 'e' COMIUNITY FACILITY ST NDARDS Amphitheater Amphitheaters are not addressed by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) Pacility standards. The recreation trends and demographics identified that with the maturation of the community comes an appreciation of music, dance and art. All of these can be conducted or provided at an amphitheater. Balanced with the perceived need for family-oriented facilities, as well as with population maturation and an increased interest in cultural activities related to music, dance and theatre, a facility standard of 1/30,000 is recommended. Utilizing the recommended facility standard of 1/30,000 and projecting them to the year 2010 identifies a need for six amphitheaters. Community Center The NRPA Standard suggests a standard of 1/15,000. Rancho Cucamonga currently has two community centers. What with the rising land costa in the area, facil itiae such as banks and churches are not constructing associated meeting rooms. These facilities, if they were available, could supplement the City~s inventory of meeting apace. A facility standard of 1/20,000 for community centers is r@COmmend P.d. Tt in imnnr~t ant in aAAlH nn •.. •w: =~'5~~3?.a. analyze the center itself; its size, configuration, layout and function. It appears from discussions with staff, that our two canters are too small, or have physical layouts that are not conducive to conducting more than one activity at a time, which limits the facilities flexibility and ef.f iciency. The facilities should be planned and designed for this flexibility and shculd respond to the specific needs of the potential groups that may use the facility such as child care, seminars, family services, dance/exercise services, youth services and community groups. If their needs for storage, equipment, area and schedule are met, then the system maintains its flexibility. Util:ziny^ 1 f^Ciiity Standard Of 1i20,uG0 and nrn_jar_.t iP., to the year 2010 indicates a need for 9 centers. Since two facilities are existing, there will be a need for 7 additional facilities. l9( wimmira/Competitive Relative to the NRPA Standards, the community park system in Rancho Cucamonga is deficient in its provision of swimming pools. Currently, the only swimming pools in the City ors located at Chaftey College and Alta Loma High School. A facility standard of 1/20,000 which is the NRPA Standard, is recommended. Swimming facilities should be geographically located and desigrad to be accessible. It should be flexible in its design, layout and scheduling to address the competitive and recreation swimming demand of the community. Utilizing the recommended facility standard of 1/20,000, and projecting to the year x010, indicates that it will be necessary to pray ids nine Wool facilities. Two swim facilities exist currently and ono is being built at Etiwanda High School. It will be necessary to provide six additional facilities; however, the actual number to be built may vary, depending on each facilities' size. • Fine Arts Center NRPA Standards are not available for the provision of FLna Arts Centers in a community. Trio changing demographics of the community show that with a maturing population there will be an increeaad inf ernat in _...+ ___,____ --_-n -; ,_ ..c....r,.m music, art and special interests. A facility standard of 1/180,000 should be utilized based on the use factor in cities of similar size. The facility should be centrally located and should be maintained as a Fina Arts facility. A Fina Arts facility is special iznd, but it offers cultural enrichment to the community and it should be maintained as the only facility of its type in Rancho Cucamonga. This facility could grow with the community, with large meeting rooms for lectures and perhaps studio space and/or a museum gallery. The development of outreach or satnllitn programs at the high schools and junior high schools would help inereasn the awareness factor of tine arts within the community. Using the new Civic cnnter capniex ea an area to display werk in pr~yraas and art shows would be another way to increase awareness of the facility. Golf/Oriving Ranee / ~~ The NRPA Standards suggest one •ightsen-hole golf coura• for every 50,000 reeidnnts. With the demographic and economic profile of the Rancho Cucamonga population, golf is one of the activitie^ that would have a high participation rate but did not rata high in tack Loree priorities. With Aancho Cucasonga~a higher median income and higher participation levels, certain activitiu such as golf will experience an increase in growth. s It is recommended that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or another public or private entity, provides two or three oubiic +~>,+een- hole golf course's and encourage development of a golf driving range. Perhaps a quality residential development landed by private enterprise will bring golf into their planned community. Gvmnasium The NRPA Standards of 1/10,000 for gymnasium needs to be addressed within the near future. A gymnasium is a specialized facility that is usually provided at a public junior and high school. Chef tey Collage and the Y.M,C.A. also have a gym. The current gymnasiums fall short of meeting the programming needs of the City. 3ased on the strong support of the community for gymnasiums to support programs such as basketball, volleyball, weight training, dance/exercise classes, tamily service centers and fitness and gymnastics for all ogee, there is a great need to plan for these facilities to meet standards within our City. . Tha recommended facility standard of 1/10,000, when projected to the year 2010, indicates that a total of 18 gymnasiums .rill be necessary. The actual number of gymnasiums to be built may vary, depending on each facilities size. Five gymnasiums are currently being utilized, on a limited basis, by the Commuity Services Department simply because of the schools demand for their inuiiiLies. is is eXLremely dliilcmlL t0 progrdm at Chaffey Collage, Alta Loma and Etiwanda High School and Alta Loma and Etiwanda Junior High Schools because of their activities. Staff has ideal ifiad a need far a minimum of six additional gymnasiums for City programming. Gymnasiums ranked first in the groups consensus for facilities. Natural Area NRPA Standards addressing the provision of natural areas do not currently exist. However, several community surveys and the Park S Recreation Fac111tias Task Force addresead the issue of preservation of natural areas Lor scenic or cultural value. The demographics analysis indicates that ae a population matures, a demand for passive recreation such as enjoying natural areas will dpV0i09. aaii5 19 ~bit6 intent with rerroatinn trenjy fFat i.i L.nrl f.. a need for people to visit historic and cultural arses in natural settings. It is prof acted that this need will increase dun to changes in median income and age. Also, the State recommends that to balance an increase in urbanization, natural areas will have to ba provided in or near urbanized areas. This makes them accessible to the majority of people. The Task Force memberc and the recent Clty survey exprused the need for the preservation of natural features and the creation c! open, passive park wren. / ^~ Tha viewpoint of staff and the two groups c•~ed above is the product of two things: the urbanization of the area, which eliminated the agrarian landscape that had historically existed, and the intensity of the urbanization, which is causing rising land costs. Aa land casts increase, the lot size and amount of open space generally decreases. These Pactors all contribute to an expressed need in the community for natural areas. It is important in an area like Rancho Cucamonga, which has a rich history of agriculture, orchards, ranching and physical beauty, to preserve some of these elements tar people to remember and enjoy. This will help keep Rancho Cucamonga a spncial place. The parks are, and can continue to be, strong visual elements that reinforce the pride and image of Rancho Cucamonga. It is difficult to identity a facility standard Yor provision of natural areas in Rancho Cucamonga. It would be more appropriate to identify the Head to inventory all unique visual, cultural, historical and physical leaturas and establish a minimum size of ~e acres for env natural area deaianation. These areas should be . geographically distributed throughout Rancho Cucamonga and connected to the existing or proposed open space system and/or regicnal park system. It is not appropriate, in the absence of a facility standard, to identity a apecilis need for the year 2010. However, it is aDnronriatn to 1A<nti P.. t1.a• •wa~., ....• ~~___~ __ :n a - a_- _J -._J natural areas. Trail9 Trails are not addressed by NRPA, but they have been identified by the Task Force ae being extremely important elements within the City oL Rancho Cucamonga. The demographic information highlights that ae a population matures and income increases they are increasingly oriented towards riding, walking, hiking and natural experiences. Trails that are conductive far horses, bicycles, walking and jogging are a recommended element in the community park system. current plans call for trails to interconnect the parka, or connect with the ones apaoe system and regicnal park system. Performing Arts Information available Lrom NRPA doaa not addraa^ ar aatablish standards for providing arts facilities. Tha City's demographic information indicatao that a maturing, affluent community has the potential to incraea• the gommunity appreciation of cultural wants . , / The Taak Force aemuain ~naids for our City ranked cultural erta facility--visual and performing second behind a central library. Tha numarow aubcommittus o! the Task Force recommended this lacility ae one o! their highest pzioritlee. A standard of 1/180.000 is recom*~ended with seating Por 800 people in a Lacility designed for cultural arts - visual and performing. Senior Center/ rv;ree Standards for the provision of senior centers and services are not speciiled by NAPA. The state recreation trend analysis highlights a change in the population composition that indicates a "maturation" of the population and a change in recreation emphasis Erom active to more passive interests. A "senior center facility" ranked third by the community Task Force assessing needs as a priority for the City. Currently the Community Services Department programs for seniors exclusive at the Neighborhood Center. The senior population is expands.-: so Last that the existing Lacility will not be able to meet recreation programming needs in the very Weer future. The F..~ncho Cucamonga Ne ighborhood Center (R.C.N.C.) could be expanded by room additions and overall general improvements including storage space, more parking, tlexib ility in room layout and access and • some adjacent outdoor recreation facilities. Tha Park and Recreation Commission consider senior citizen tacilitlas and services as a high priority need in the community. A recommended facility standard of 1/50.000 is projected to the ..L ~ucee 'ii sem r centers will be necessary-to satisfy ythe requirement. Youth/Teen Center< The NRPA Standards do not address the provision of youth centers. However, the Community Task Force ranked teen centers as their number one (1) priority in the future construction of community multi-use facilities. The Task Force Sdentiiled a concern for youths and their spare time. The many single and two parent warkinq households create a situation where parents are unable to supervise attar school time, creating a need for programs to occupy and structure this tlae. The provision of youth services and programs is important to Rancho Cucamonga and Sts youths. However, one centralized Lacility in one physical location makes it inacceaeibl• to soma who lack transportation and a modsrat• drive Lor others. with the growth prof acted in the community, it la important for the facilities to maintain their Llsxibility and their ability to respond to changes in the community. Staff isel• dscentrallzed programming at di!lsrent community canters, gymnasiums, junior and asnior high schools (after school and on weekends) are likely to mut with more youth programming succss• than one centralized Lacility. To be succesatul with teen/youth programming programs and servlce• must be ac~s~s~l• to the youth. RANCRO CUCAMONGA PIRR PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Chief Michaelr Fire Chief BY: Ron Mayfield, Division Chief SUBJECT: Consideration for Approval of a Resolution Supporting a Ha11ot Measure PrppnSina tha Levv of a Special Tax to Fund a District Provided Paramedic Program. The Ballot Measure is Based upon Information and Data Contained in the Paramedic Master Plan Adopted by Foothill Fire Protection Dist r.ict DATE: July 13, 1989 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution supporting a ballot measure proposing the levy of a special tax to fund a Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Paramedic Program. Background/Analysis .... i.... .._.. ....~. .. ......... ~.. .. r_.,. _ ...... .. .....__ _..r.,.. ~.::. r. .............. staff report dated May 31, 1989) the Fire District has been working towards the implementation of a fire district paramedic program. The program recommendations are a result of two independent consultant studies. The first consultant identified the need to increase the level of emergency medical care within our community through a fire district paramedic engine company program. The second consultant established a complete E.M.S. (emergency medical services) paramedic implementation master plan (see attached). As a result of the information and data contained in the paramedic master plan adopted by Foothill Fire Protection District in nnrii i___ P'i ro iii crri rr w112 pla re a nallnt mag dire before nthe ~voterse in the upcoming November 7, 1989 election for the purpose of funding the entire paramedic program. l9~ Staff Report July 13, 1989 Page Two On June 29, 1989, the Foothill Fire Protection District Board of Directors approved Resolution No. 06-06-89 (see attached), which calls for the election and identifies the measure to be placed on the November ballot for voter approval. Also attached is a copy of the staff report dated June 23, 1989, which provides recommendation and background to the adoption of Resolution No. 06-06-89. On July 11, 1989, the Public Safety Commission (through Resolution t]o. 89-002, attached) officially supported a proposed ballot meaSUTe initiated by the N'OOthlll :Y re Yrotec Lion Ui StriCt to levy a special tax to fund paramedic services provided by the Foothill Fire Protection District. As a result of the provided background information, staff has attached a resolution of support for the Fire District Paramedic 9allot Measure which the City Council may adopt if desired. Respectfully submitted, .-~ r rn r~~a `z~`{ <<~ Ron Mayfield Division Chief RM/rb attachments I l I .;ti ...: - F®m~l~n~fl F~~ I~~TIE~'~'d®1~T ~~~'~'~~~'Ti' STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor and Council Members, r_hairman an Members of the Public Safety Commission, Ci y f Rancho Cucamonga FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief L BY: Ron Mayfield, Division Chief DATE: May 31, 1989 ~ SUBJECT: PARAMEDIC N.ASTER PLAN Recommendation The Foothill Fire Protection District staff, on behalf of the Hoard of Directors, requests City Council and the Public Safety Commission support of the adopted Paramedic Master Plan. Furthermore, we request supoort of a ballot measure, imp le*~.e ntation and administrative coordination towards the success of the Fire District Paramedic Program. Summary Based on a feasibility study and community survey, the Foothill Fire Protection District developed a Paramedic Master Plar. (See attached). Considerable time, research and input was involved in obtaining a completed E.M.S. (Emergency Medical Service) Master Plan. The final (Hoard adopted) Master Plar. was received in May of 1989. The Foothill sire Protection District Board of Directors elected to place the Paramedic Program N,=_asure on the November 7, 1989 ballot for voter approval. Staff is currently compiling the resolution and measure necessary to place the program before the general voters. This report is intended to provide an update on the paramedic program success. Backgz^~!n3 During June o`_ 1987, the Foothill Fire Protection District Board received a completed paramedic feasibility study from American Med Tech, a San Diego consulting firm. This study recommended an engine company paramedic program for the Foothill Fire Protection District. This recommendation was based on the fact that such a program would be the most cost-efficient method of increasing paramedic services to the District. Such a program would also improve staffing for fire suppression and would improve paramed9ic integration with special services Staff Report ` PARAMEDIC MASTER PLAN May 31, 1989 Page 2 (i.e., HAZMAT Teams, Search & Rescue, etc.). Many other benefits not listed here are also expected. During May, 1988 E.M.S. Systems Design was retained to complete a community survey to assist the Foothill Fire Protection District with determining the community climate concerning a fire department based paramedic program. The results of the survey suggested an overwhelming support (808) in favor of a fire department based paramedic program. Further, 57.78 of the survey respondents indicated they would be willing to pay for an annual fee for such a service. The response on funding was considerably significant due to the tact that no public education had previously occurred on this issue in the community. During November, 1988, the Foothill fire Protection District approved E.M.S. Systems Design to work with staff in the development of a Paramedic Master Plan. The Master Plan clearly identifies all of the key elements necessary for implementing the paramedic program. The Master Plan would recommend steps to be taken as follows: Scope/Service delivery standards; Timeframe/Tasks tc implement; Sources of funding; Detailed personnel/Equipment plan; and, A plan to interface with Mercv Ambulance Service and surrounding communities. Staff and E.M.S. Systems Design conducted research involving other fire department paramedic systems as well as potential funding sources. With the help of District staff, E.M.S. Systems Design has also completed an analysis of data on current medical aid responses in the Foothill Fire Protection District. Approximately 18 hours of briefing sessions was held wish fire-fighters in the District to solicit their input and to answer their questicns. A Paramedic Advisory Committee was also established with representation of: I.C.E.M.A. ~tv of Rancho Cucamcnca Foothill Fire Protection District management firefighters Grafton Hi11s College Mercy Ambulance Service San Antonio Hospital Iq9 Staff Report PARAMEDIC MASTER PLAN Nay 31, 1989 Page 3 Two one-day retreats were also held in early January and February with District staff to identify service delivery standards of a fire department based program and to discuss other program options. One very important product of the retreat was the identification of a response time service delivery standard as follows: Response mime Standard 908 of all emergencies within 5 minutes and the remaining lOB to average less than 10 minutes other standards as well as thresholds for future growth are identified in the Master Plan. The ultimate mission of the Paramedic Master Plan is to provide an increased, higher quality medical services delivery system to the deserving citizens in the Foothill Fire Protection District response area. As a result of Board approval to place the Paramedic Program Measure before the voters in November, 1989, the following sequence of events should take place: 1. May and June, 1989 - Develop the resolution to order the consolidation of the special election. 2. June, 1989 - Board adopts the resolution. 3. June - August - Notify County Clerk and Registrar of Voters. Advertise and accept arguments. 4. August 15 - Deadline for accepting arguments. 5. July and Auqust - Establish citizen advisory and campaign committee. Solicit funding and support. 6. August - October - Massive public education campaign in support of the measure. 7. November 7 - Elt etion...and hopefully, approval: I look forward to addressing any comments, questions or concerns at the regulazly scheduled Juna City Council and Public Safety Commission meetings. If you have any questions prior to the meetings, please don't hesitate to call. /rer ~~~ RESOLUTION No. 06-06-89 A RESOLUTION OF TNB HOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THH FOOTHILL FIRM PROTHCTION DISTRICT, SAN BH RN ARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PROPOSING THH LEVY OP A SPECIAL TA% WITHIN THE DISTRICT TO FUND A DISTRICT PROVIDED PARAMEDIC PROGRAM PROP09IN0 AN INCREASH IN THE DISTRICT'S APPROP RIATION9 LIMIT, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OP A SPECIAL ELBCTION~ AND ABQUHSTING THH BOARD OP SUPERVISORS OP THE COUNTY OY SAN BERNARDINO TO CONSOLIDATE SAID ELECTION WITH THE GHNERAL ELECTION TO BH HELD NOVEMBER 7, 1989 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Foothill Flre Protection Dletrict (the "Dletrict"( hereby finds and determines that the provision of paramedic service provided by the Dletrict would be In the beet interssie of the rssldsnes of 11nd those persons employed by commercial and Indust rlal eetabl Lhmenta In the Dlatrlctf WHEREAS, the provle ions of Health end safety Code Section 13913 and Ari lcle 3.5 (commencing with 9cctlon 50075( of Chapter 3 of Pert 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Coda authors re the Dletrict Lo adopt a special tax for paramedic services to be provided by the Dletclctj NHEREAS, on June 29, 1989, the Board of Directors did conduct a duly noticed public hearing and receive and consider all testimony and evidence from all Lntereeted parsons regarding the proposed special tnx lavy~ NHEREAS, under the prov lelons of the 1sN relating [o the Dletrict, a apscfal Dletrlet election may be held on November 7, 1989{ WHEREAS, the eosrd of Directors desires to submit to the quellEied electors of CLe Olstrlut at Hoch election the qutat ion hereinafter set Eorth relating to (i) the levy of a special tax to fund paramedic urvicas to be provided by the Dietrici end (11( the increase in the approprlaElona limit of the Dletrict pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Genet ltut ion of the Stab Of Calltornle Lo enable the Diatrfo! to spend tM proceeds of such special tax to provide each paramedic eerviwe( end ~( WHEREASr it le desireb le that said special District election be consolidated with the general election to De held on November 7, 1989, that within the District the precincts, polling places, and election officers of the two elections be the same, that the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino Canvaee the [eturne of the special District electicn, and that said epselal District elect SOn and general electlon Lp held In all reapecic as !f there were only one. NON, TH BREPORE, TH6 BOARD OP DIRaCTORe OP THE FOOTHILL PIAB PAOTBCTION D IBTRICT DOE9 HERSBY RBSOLV6, OBTERMINS AND ORDBR 713 POI.I.ONS: Section 1. That the Foregoing recitel• era true end Correct. Section 2. That the Donrd of Directors does hereby cell end give notice of a special District electlon to be held on Novsmber 7, 1989 within the boundaries of the D1strleG. Section 3. That the Board of DLrecLOre, pursuant to its right end nuthority to do eo, dose hereby determine that tMrs shall bs and there L hereby ordered submitted !o the quallfisd alscton of the District at EM special District sleciion the following quest ion: shall (a(: epee lei tnx to fund paramedic escvics t0 be provided by the Rancho Cucemongs The Protac- ~ YB6 I tlon District be authorised to be lavlsd by such Dls-I I I trial upon each resident lei dwelling unit and commer- clel end Sndueirlal eatabllehment !n Hoch District In ~ NO I a maximum amount not to exceed $4.10 par month per I I 1 resident lal dwelling unit or commercial or business eeiebllehment camssneing in Fiecel Yenr 1990-19911 provided: however, Chet such maximum amount may be Lncreassd annually cammancing in Fiscal Year 2000-2001 by the percentage lnc cease Ln the Coneumsr Pries Index (All !tams) for the local area wh Lch includes ouch District for Chs pracsding Fiecel Year, and Ibl: the appropriations limit of the Rancho Cucamonga Fin Protection District established pursuant to art is l• %IIIB of khe conetitutlon of the 9tnte of Csllfornle be inennsed to $8.243,869 for Fiecai Yeer 1990-1991 to ennble such District t0 expend the prOCesds Of special taxes to fund paramedic service to be provided by such Dletrict7 ~~ A mark placed In the voi ing equate, rectangle of other speci[led voting space after the word ^YES" Ln the manner provided shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the question voted upon. A mark placed in the voting equate, rectangle or other epeclf ied voting apace after the word ^NO^ in the mnnnar provided shall be counted agninet the adoption of the question voted upon. The weeure shell be adopted only upon the aff irmat lve vote of et least 2/3rde of the votes cast upon the question. Section 4. If the levy of the epee Lal tax ae proposed ie authorized by Che quallf ied electors of the District, the following provleiona shall apply to the adminietration and levy of such special taxi A. Reside ntlal dwelling unite shall Lnc lode each individual dwelling unit located within the District, including a single family how, eobilehame, each dwelling unit of a duplex, end each individual epa[twnt, condominium, end cooperative unit. Coemarelel and lnduetrial eetabllshwnts shell include each w..^,..... cetahl~shment toceted within th• District, lnc lading non-prof It organizer ions. Each commercial or industrial eetaDliehwnt In a multiple unit commerc tai and/or Lnduetrial developwnG shall be cone ldared a separate Duslnee• aetabliehwnt. No tax shell M levied on unimproved lend or on propecty owned by a federal or state or local public agency. e. The special tax shell ba levied annually by Che Board of Directors up to the maximum amount authorised for the purpose of funding paramedic services, including the caste of obteiningr turnishinq, operating end mainteLninq neceeeery equlpwnt, paying eel ar Lss, benetite end other necessary perwnnel and admLntet relive expenses o£ providing such parawdlc service. .~ 0 3 Such special taxes shall Oe collected the same time and in the some manner ax ordinary ad valorem taxes era collected by the County of San Bernardino on behalf of the District and eubjrt to the eaax3 penalties and the same procedure and solo Ln the ceee of delinquency as provided for such ed valorem Loxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of ad veioram property taxes shall be applicable Lo each special tax. Notwlthetanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors msy, 1n the exercise of its dlacretion, provide that the special texas to be collected tram commercial and industrial eetabl iehpnts shall bo Dlllsd and collected with the pusineee license tax of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The person or entity in whose nose the commercial or induatrial utablLhrnt L licensed shell W liable [or the payment of the epeciel tax. c. There ie hereby asiabllehed a paramedic service fund. All of the some collecmd pursuant to the levy of tM special tax shell De deposited into the paramedic service fund end shall be aced exclusively [or the provision e~M edminietretlon of paramedic service to be provided by the District. section 5. Notice Se hereby given that the deadline of August e, 1989, at 500 P.M. Le hereby eetabl Lehed for filing with tAe Registrar o[ Voters of the county of sea Bernardino of written arguownt^ for or against the question. written ergumente may be submitted by members of this Board of Directors, any quall[Sed elector of the District, or any bona fide association of voters of the Dietrlet, or any combinat ion thereof. Ns ltten ergument• ehe31 not exceed 300 words in length end shall be filed with the Regletrer of VoUre of the County of San Bernardino, 777 Seat Rialto Avenue, San Bernardino, California 92415-0770. Any argument submitted for or egeinet the question shell G accampnn led by the stetament set forth In ^lwtions Code section 5350, caapleted and e lgned by the euthor~e) of such argum1ent. `CJ If any person submits nn argument against the question, and an argument has been flied in favor of such measure, the Registrar of Voters shall immediately send copies of that argument to the personae) fll Sng the argument in favor of each measure. The pereon)e) filing the argument in Eavor of such measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not to exceed 250 words. The Registrar of Voiere shall send cop law of the argument Ln favor of ouch measure Lo the pereon)e) fil Lng the argument against each measurer who may prepare end submit a rebuttal argument not to exceed 250 words. Rebuttal arguments mu at be flied with the Registrar of Votare at the address epecltled above no later than 5:00 P.N. ~on Auquet 15, 1989. Section 6. That this 9osrd of Dlceciore authorizes the members of the Board of Directors, or any of them, to file writbn nrquagnte in favor of or in opposition to the question and to change each argument until and including the date and time after wh SCh no ergumente mny be filed with the RegLtrar of Votern. sactlon 7. That the Board of Dlrmctorm directs the Secretary Lo Lranemlt a copy of the measure to Counsel to the District, who Le hereby directed to prepare en impartial analysis of the meneura showing the effect of the measure on the exleting law and the operation of the measure. The Lmpnrt lei nnalyels shall De filed with the Registrnr of Voter• of thm County of 9en Bernardino 6y 5:00 P,M. on August e, 1989. sectLon s. mhat the polls for such spmcial elect ion shall M open e! 7:00 A.M. on November 7, 1989 and shell remain open coot inuously trom Hoch tLme until 8:00 P.M. of the same day when the poll^ shall De cloned, except en provldmd in sactlon 14301 of the Elect lone Code of the 8tats of Cal!lornle. section 9. That pursuant to the requlrwwnt• o[ the 6lectlons Code of the stets of Cellfornia, the Board of supscvisors of the County of Snn Bernardino is hereby requested to consent and agree to thm consolldetlon of such special O1strleL •lection with the general election to be hold on November 7, 1989. ~~~ The Board of supervisors le hereby requested to le sue instruct lone to [he RegUtrer o[ Voter• to tale any end all .taps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election. Section 30. The Ragieirer of Voters of the County of San Bernardino Ls hereby authorized to procure end furnish any and all official Dallote, noLlese, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and perapharnelie that may De necessary in order to properly end lawfully conduct the election. The Dallote to W wad at the election shell be, Doth as to form and matter contained LMrein, such as may W required Dy law to M used at such elect ion. Section 11. The foothill lire Protection District recognlxas that additional costa will ba incurred Dy the County of can Bernardino 6y reason of Lh• consolidation and agrees to raimDurae the County of San Bernardino for any such coats. Section 12. The 8acretary of the Board of Directors is hereby ordered to innredlately file a certified copy of thin resolution with the Board of 9upervieors end the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino. Atldltionally, the secretary eha 11 Lnmedletely give notice of the adoption end contents of this resolution se soon ae possible Dy causing Chs publication of this resolution once Sn a newspaper of general circa latlon in the Oletr Lct end 6y mnlnteininq this reeolut ion on fLle for public inspect ton and dlstrl6utlon. ADOPTED on the 29th day of JU B(: , 1989. ATTBSTt eecntsry ~ O (BtAL) sTAT6 or cACxroRxxA ) ) ee. COUNTY OP SAN BBRNARDINO ) I, L. DENNIS MICHAEL, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the roothlll fire Rrotacilon District Do HEREBY CBRTITY that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. , wse duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said District et a duly called and conducted uaetinq of said Board held on the day of 1989, end Chat LL was so adopted by the following votes AY69: Amodt, Mdt5000. Quintana noes: Lyons ABSENT: Eggleston 6ecretary (REAL) v O ll'~ILJCIIIlll~ FIl1C~E ^ 1f~R®'~'E~Tg®laT ~~~'I["R~C°~' STAFF REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Chief Michael C~~~~7L~~ BY: Chief Ron Mayfield SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 06-06-89 Regarding the Proposed Special Tax for Paramedic Services DATE: June 23, 1989 Recommendation Staff would recommend the Board of Directors adopt Resclution No. 06-06-89, which authorizes and calls for a special District election that will present to the qualified voters (of our District) the question of the levy of a special tax to finance a District operated paramedic program. Background As directed by the Board, staff has been working with Mike Williams (E,M.S. Systems besign) ane warren uiven iacceruey for Brown and Diven) to develop the necessary resolution that authorizes and calls for the election to place the paramedic program before the public for financial support. Attached is a copy of the resolution that clearly defines all the information necessary to place the measure on the ballot in November, 1989. The measure identifies the following key points: 1. Declaration of Public Notice to be held on June 29, 1989 (see attached copies of Notice of Public Hearing, Pq.l) 2. To cs11 for a consolidated election with the general San P=_rna rd ino ~nunty election to be held on November 7, 1989 Pg.2) 3. Identifies the measure as it will appear on the ballot (Pg.2) A. Asks for the special tax levy of $4.10 per month e. Asks for an increase in our appropriations Limit in order to use th`e collected funds d~ . Staff Report Resolution 06-06-89 June 23, 1989 Page 2 4. Identifies how the tax will be levied Section 4 Pg.3) 5. Identifies the deadline of August 8, 1989 to submit arguments in favor or against the measure (Section C Pg.4) 6. Identifies the deadline of August 15, 1989 to submit rebuttals to arguments (Pg.6) i. Calls for our attorney to draft and submit the impartial analysis of the measure and file the analysis with the County Registrar of Voters 8. Identifies filing of the resolution with the County Registrar and the Board of Supervisors (Pg.6) In addition, the attached report from Mr. Diven outlines the process involved in the Public Hearing. If you have any questions involving process or resolution, please do not hesitate to call. Also attached is the final copy of the costs associated with the paramedic programs. The final figure will amount to $4.10 per month for each dwelling, commercial and industrial unit. The Explanation of Costs (Pg.l) allows for a quick glance pertaining to the cost breakdown of the program. Mike Williams of E.M.S. Systems Design will be at the Board meeting to present an overview of the Cost Program. The last major step for a successful election, hence a District operated paramedic program, is a MASSIVE EDUCATION CAMPAIGN involving a strong Political Action Committee. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. /rer v O J ,, -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 11, 1989 To: Chairman and Public Safety Commission FROM: Duane A. Haker, Adminietratlve Ace ietan~ SUBJECT: A n n C F'Y P t ~ 1 pl .1 _~ At the Public Safety Commies ion meeting of June 6, 1989, the Commission reviewed the Fire District's paramedic plan. At that time, the Commis lion directed staff to review the plan and the proposed ballot measure, to insure that each a plan did not have a negative impact on the City's General Fund, and to determine what impact thin would hays on properties with other assessments and taxes levied upon them. After reviewing all the financial information related to this paramedic plan, staff finds that the funds that would be raised from the ballot measure would be more than enough to cover the coat of the paramedic service and thus, there will not be a negative impact on the City's General Fund. In addition, staff ~"'", ~ has reviewed the potential impact on properties ir. relation [o ocher aeseeementa •.%''~ and taxes levied. In general, there will not be aignLf scant impact on propert sea as such to preclude any further asaesemente or taxes to be levied Co help fund __r. -.. _.. "h'.^* ^^•.Id nn idontiEied at a future date. It should be nosed, that in the^northeast Etiwanda area there ie a poea ibility for the total tax rate to go above 1.8. However, the amount above 1.8 will be insignificant in relation to the total value of the property, and due to the fact that this particular tax would be voted upon it would mostly likely be mare acceptable to property owners than an imposed tax. In addition to reviewing the financial components, staff has reviewed the language of the ballot measure and has been unable to find any potential difficult see for the community. Attached please find a Resolution of support for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire D istrict'a Paramedic Ballot Neaeuce, whicR the Public Safety Commi59 ion may adopt iE desired. DAB:jls 89-441 ^ ~ ~~~sl'a~~~gJ -' ~•'~ ABSOLUTION NO. 89-002 A ABSOLUTION OP Tf7B PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION OF TH8 CITY OF RANCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A PROPOSED BALLOT NEASOAB INITIATED BY TFD3 FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO LBVY A SpBCIAL TA% TO FUND PARAMEDIC SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIRG PROTSCTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Public Safety Commission hoe reviewed Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District •e Paramedic Plan and proposed Dalloi measure to provide for paramedic services; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Commission finds that the implementation of this pazansadic plan will eMance the quality of public safety services available [o the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, which will in turn enhance the quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga; end WHERHAS, the Public Safety Commission has found chat the proposed plan and bat lot measure will not have n negative impact on the financial resources of the City Co provide other necessary cervices to the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. NoW, TFIERBPORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD, that the Public Safety Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga tloes Reteby support the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Paramedic Plan and the proposed ballot measure to levy a special tax to fund paramedic service provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dletr lc t. 1 I R850LUTION NO. 89~J A RESOLUTION OF TFOS CITY COUNCIL OP Tfffi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOPNIA, SUPPORTING A PROP0.SED BALLOT MEASURE INITIATED BY TBB FOOTHILL PIRB PROTECTION DISTRICT TO LEVY A BPECIAL TA% TO FUND PARA!ffiOIC SERVICES PAOVIDEU 0Y TFffi RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIAS PROTECTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe reviewed Rancho Cucamonga F1[e Protection Dietrlet'a ParaneAlc Plan end proposed ballot measure to provide for paramedic eervicee, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reecho Cucamonga finds that the implementation of thin paramedic plea will enhance the quality of public safety eervLcee available to tho citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, which will in turn enhance the quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga; end WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hen found that the proposed plan and ballot measure will not have a negative impact on the f inancinl resources of the Clty to provide other necessary eervicee to the c itizene of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Public Safety Commission hoe indicated Lte support of the Paramedic Plan and the proposed ballot auvaeure in Reaolutlon No. 89-002. NOw, TNERBPOAB, BB IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hareDy support the Rancho Cucamonga Pire Protection D ietrict Paramedic Plan and the proposed ballot measure to levy a special tax to fund paramedic nervice provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Pica Protection U ietrict. /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATR: Suly 19, 1989 ~`Yf~ TO: Mayor and City Council .~Q~ FROM: Gehorah N. Brown, Councilwoman ~ SUBSECT: CpASitlerntion f Aee 1 do S tin H A 23 1 A geetoration Act of 1989 RBCOMlU3NDATION• The City Council approve the attached Resolution supporting renewal of tae Federal Clean air Act. BACRGROUND• On ,iuly 5, 1989 the San Bernardino aesocieted cover:wents (SANBAGj Board approved the attached Resolution and requested cities also approve the attechetl Dean1~.11_n__.. ____ ml... n ~.. , ~~ •es~.VL n1.iV11 Ul Nltl :.ltlatl A1r flCL. DNB:jla 89-d75 ~ /3 RESOLUTION NO. 89-~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING H. R. 2323, CLEAN AIR ASSTORATION ACT OP 1989 WHERGS, the December 31, 1987 attainment deadline contained in the 3977 federal Clean Air Act Amendments (the Act) hoe passed, the South Coast Air Basin ie among almost 100 metropolitan areas acroea the nation which failed to achieve attainment of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) Dy this date; and x86R6A8, the 12 million people in Ghia air basin are exposed to the worst air qualify in the nation. In fact, the exposure levels in the South coast Air e actin are five times greater than in any other city in the United States. Ozone and carbon monoxide have been shown to cause scarring of the lunge, reduced heart and lung funct Lon, chest gain, and increased incidence of lung infection. There La medical evidence that repeated short-term ¢xpoeurea to ozone may cause permanent damage; and 1IBENEAS while the existing Act contains comprehensive provisions to reduce ozone and carbon monoxide emissions, etatea and localities have had dif ticulty in attaining the NAAQS by the congres atonally-mandated deadline of December 31, 1987. The problems have included 1) unrealieiic nttainment deadlines; 2) failure of the federal government to sufficiently regulate certain sources (e.g. rt~otor vehicles, trains, planes, ships, and nationally distributed coat toga and solvents); and 3) the inherent diff Lcult lea associated with predicting attainment using mnthemntical models; and NBER6A3. Ln January 1989 the Cal iforn ie Clean Air Act !AB 2595 Short became lawn it requires areas to develop, adopt, and implement control plane which at minimum demonatrete a St per year reduction of emiaaiona. AB 2595 represents a strong commitment by California to aggreeeively pursue and achieve healthful air quality; and WRSREAS, each level of government moat do its fair share in controlling air pollution; and WEERRAB, the South Coast Air Basin cannot achieve healthful air quality without a strong federal clean Air Aci framework; and WBEREAB, Ca ngresamen Henry Waxman and Jerry Lewis ere to b¢ commanded for their leadership and etateemanehip in negot Sating legielatlon which provides Cal Lfornia and the net ion the assurance that the federal government will do its fair share in cur air pollution clean up efforts. NOW, TBBREroR6, B6 IT R680LVED that the City of Rancho Cucamonga eupporta H.R. 2323, Clean Air Restoration Act of 1989 to provide far an aggreae the federal control program needed to reduce emieelone from motor vehic lee and other sources under federal jurisdiction. .~r~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 19, 1989 ~~~ T0: Mayor end CSty Council PROM: Deborah M. Brown: Councilwoman ~~Z1V' SUBJECT: C~ v The City Council approvm the attached Aaaolution urgLng Smswdiate approval Dy the California Air Resources Hoartl of the Booth Coast Air 4uality Management Districts and Southern Calitornls Association of covernmente Air Quality Management Plen. LLL9;StlS•l+lil•~ On July 5, 1989, the San Bernardino Aaaoclatad nevarnmenie (SANBAG) Board apptoveA the ettechsd Aaaolution snd requeetad cities also approve the attached ReeoluL ion. The cal ifornia Air Resources Hoazd has delayed Lte approval for the plan at least 60 days and since Sen Bernertlino County will be the moat severely impacted by continuing etlvarse air quality, BANBAC ie seeking the earliest poes ible implementation of said plan. DNB:j le ` / 89-475 d RBSOLOTION NO. 39 ~-.1~~ A RESOLUTION OF TNB CITY COONCIL OP TIC CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING IMMEDIATE APPROVAL SY THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOUACSS SOAAD OF TM6 SODTM COAST AIR QDALITY MANACSMENT DISTRICTS AND SOUTHSRN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OP GOVERN!ffiNTS AIR QUALITY MANAGSMSNT PLAN WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Quality Nanagement District (SCAQMD) and Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) have adopted a far- reaching 20 year Air Quality Management Plan (AQHP) designed to meet federal antl et ale air quality standards; and NBERE113, ea id plan was endorsed by the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), representing all 21 cities and the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County; and NBEREAB, eeid plan moat be approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARH) prior to submittal to the United Sietea Snvitonmental Protection Agency for its approval; but NHEREA3, the CARE hoe delayed its approval foz at least 60 days, claiming the need for further review and aeeurancee; and YIOEREAB, San Bernardino County and its 1,300,000 reeidenie, loeeted in the downwind receptor area of the South Coast Air Basin and thua being the moat severely Lmpacted by contlnuing adverse air quality, seek the earliest possible implementation of eeid plan. NOM. THEREFORE. BQ IT RESOLVED thats 1. The Cal ifornla Air Resources Board grant immediate approval of the SCAG/SCAQMD AiY Quality Management Plfln; 2. SANBAG and its SCAQt~ district-wren jur led ictione declare a commitment to implementation of those measures requiring regional and local government action. ~r~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13, 1989 To: Mayor and City Council PROM: Clyde Boyd, Chairman ~ ~ ~Q"}. Public Safety Comnieeion W' SUBJECT: LAW ENPOACSMSNT 96RVICBS At our July 11, 1989 meeting, the Public Safety Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the CLty Council direct the Co®iesion, staff, and/or perhaps a aubecmmittee of the CLty Council develop n list of criteria and topics to be included within the proposed law enforcement study. The Commission requests that this item be placed on the City Council agenda of July 19, 1989 for Council consideration of our recommendation. JF:db:emm ~r7 G ~'HO ~,~ j ~~,' Q'TY OF RANCID GiX'AMO(VC,A _ r ~A~~~~~rr ~lAAIU l~IIdL U > 1977 Joint Meetinu Rancho Cucamonga City Council Alta Loma Schooi District Central School District Cucamonga School District Stiwantla School District Chaffey Joint Union Nigh School District Julv 11, 1989 - 7:00 o. m. Lions Park Community Center 9161 ease Lina Roetl Rancho Cucamonga, California A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Ca11: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Brown Wright 6. ITRNS OR DISCUSSION 1. Use of school fecilit iea for recreation programs. 2. Planning for school facility needs antl the role of the City in school building projects. 3. City procedures in regards to school safety issues. a, Cjty parka below Foothill Boulevard. 5. Coordination and involvement of school districts and City Sn emergency preparedness programs. Joint Clty Council/School District Heeling Page 2 July 11, 1989 C C010NNIC11TIW18 pRCM TN PUBLIC This is tho Liar avd pLCa for tho gansral public to address the Citp Couvcil. Stets laM prohibits the Citp Comcil frog addpsaiag sap issue sot previously included on the Rgonda. The Citp Comcil up receive taatiwnp sod set the natter fora auhsognont Noting. Cotssata era to bs liaitad to five aiuutee per individual. I, Beverly R. Rvihslst, Citp Clerk of Lho Ciip of Rancho Cueawnga, hereby certify that a true, accurate Copp of the foregoing agenda wes posted on Julp 7, 1989, seventy-two (7I) home prior to the arstivg par eovervwevt Code 54953 at 9330-C Rau Line Road. .p ~ ~CAMp e : ~ RA1VC}10 QJGMONC',A CITY COUNCIL 0 Z AGENII~ U > 1977 ADDEINDM Joint Meeting Ranchc Cucamonga City Council Alta Lena School DSetLioi Central School District Cucanwngs School District Etiwanda School District chaffey Joint Union Rlgh School District Ju lv 11. 1989 - 7:00 o.m. Lions Pexk Conmm~lty Center 9161 ease Llne Road Rancho Cucamonga, California ADDED ITEM OP DIBWSSION 1. Recycling and etlucei ion efforts. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AGENDA Lioas Paek CoeMmitp Canter 9161 Baw Liao Road Rancho Cuca~oaga, Gliforaia 7t00 p.e. - August 2, 1989 (1~ CALL TO OADRR 1. Boll Call: Buquat_, Alexander StOUt_r Brown, and Bright. This is the Lisa sad piece for the geaeMl publle to addrea• iha Piro District Board. state law prohtbib the Diatsiot Bwrd lrva addreating anp issue not prvioualp iaaluded on the Ageada. The Diatrict aoard y7 reeelw [utisway avd sat the utGr for a subaeaueot retina. Pv~..nte ... •e n. aa..(t~ !! f;-- eivutes per iadiVidual. c. rnRaarrr GLOmAR 1. Approval of 8xpendituree [or the month of June 1989. (p9. 1) 2. Approval to receive and file the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of the Boothill Fire PYOtect ion District Board of Oirectore held on June 29, 1989. (pg, 19) 3, Approval LO authorize an Adminietrative Pee (CO FC89-001) fot the collection of special taxes within Community Facilities Fire Diatrict 88-1 (pg. 29) D. PDAi.IC BaARIA09 No Items Submitted. Rancho Cucamonga Fira -2- Auguei 2, 1989 Protection District Agenda 6. BTArr RBPORTB 1. CONSIDERATION TO RESCIND RBBOLUTION O1 07 86 ADOPTED EY THE P RTi PROTECTION DISTRICT AND IN ZTS PLACE ADOPT RESOLUTION PD 89-01 SETTING FORTH THB TITffi AND DATE OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GOAD MEETINGS AS TAH PIAST AND TRIAD NEDNBSDAYS OP THE MONTH BEGINNING AT 7.30 P.M. O (pg. 31) RESOLUTION NO. PD 89-01 A RHSOLUTION OP TBB BOARD OF DIRBCTOAS OP TH8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION OISTRICT~ CODNTY OF SAN BBRNARDINO~ STATE OF CALIPORNIA~ BSTABLISNING A TINB AND PLACB POR HOLDING REGULAR M6BTINGS OF THB BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 01-07-86 2. ELECTION OF PRESIDENT VICE-PRESIDENT ANO SECRETARY TO THE RANCHO CUCANONGA FIRS PROTECTION DISTRICT (pg. 33) 3. CONSIDERATION OP ADOPTS CH APPOINTS A TREASURER TO THH AANCNO CUCANONGA 1286 PROTECTION NISTRICT (pg. 36) RESOLUTION NO. PD 89-02 A RESOLUTION OP THE BOARD OB DIRECTORS OP TH8 RANCHO CDCANONGA FIRS PROTECTION DISTRICT, COONTY OP SAN BERNARDINO~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA APP02NTING A DISTRICT TREASVIIHA r. ADSOVRNIDHIT RANCHO C[JCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Date: August 2, 1989 To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager From: Dennis Michael, Fire Chief By: Alex Ah umada, Administrative Services Officer Subject: APPROVAL OF EIIPENDITURES FOR THE NONTH OF JUNE 1989 ="~, ~~ :~ REC0YlENDATiON: '~ Approval of consolidated expenditures in the amount of 5547,593.08 on the current Consent Calendar. ANALYSIS: During the month of June the District expended the following amounts in the various accounts listed below: $460,602,62 General Fund 85,298,49 Community Facilities District 1691.91 Reimbursement Account (new CFD) au+, ,.+>~. uu BACKGROUND: Dn a monthly basis, historically, the Board of Directors had approved the expenditures for the previous month. District staff is requesting that the City Council perform the same function. Expenditures during the month are allocated to the General Fund, the Community Facilities District or the Reimbursement Account for the newly established CFD. This consolidated expenditure report is placed on the Consent Calendar for approval by the governing board. R^s pectfully submitt ^ ~~i i~~~j~~~ L. Dennis Michael fire Chief LDM/ARA/dah .Yi C !i o ' _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ 1 ; `"~. !. i a i I p 1 ~ s ° wm ~` n.1 i y ' u i _ ~'<~~~~ ' ~ °a°u °e ~ v e ~ ~ d ~~ _~ ~~ r.o ~ i~r o0 0 s~za ~vo =~ ~ ~ " ~ ~V~ . : s y ~J ' W ~~~ loo T T T ~ J ~ u ~ • ~Y MFIy 1-~F 66 lti e~ " o ~^ ~y ~o~Jao~~a iu V~ 1 n ogees ! ~ ,gy m Y GYM vY1~ tS u.j .(U ` ~ oOW "~ ~Tj ~ „ ~r e~° ~ is oa urJ ~ 9 ue~,o + T ~ u~ o ~ L uu IT mm eo o ~ A+ A ` ` ..m b.. ' ~ Fzzsr~t=m u ' w n ~i m 9 ~ ~~'n lu y ~ . i ~V ~ _ ea . m ~ N lm m~ mm l e :?. ° o r~ ~ T ro O'" I ~~' NNN ^~.^^<o~ ! N: ~ : ~ " I " II N .m "" m » o o . nom „ N nN n . „ I j ~ ~ 1 '~ ~ i yy ' i W ~ ~ m NI ' W W ~ 6 ~ 'G 5 O V ` ~ ~ N 6 ~ y I le ~y ti I ry y ~ ~ n M c O r F l .pvtl Ih N~V < ~ ~b ~b a 09 ' o o a o I t t 1.J I I ~' . S e 9 ~ .. 7.% 1...4- ~ _ 1- n ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Cc' ~' ~ i ,~ I~ i'i Nwo r~ a Kul ~~ y` I I 0 I ~'r . 1 ) 3 I ! I I ' I I~ I W IV -~a- ~so~~~W - - ~~ a€~ ~aT" a~v~' E>S S noBa 4 !~! ~66n~ ~5~ ~.. i ~ N ti vii ~~ ~~~ 6y~eg~ o m'ubi V y„o~ °p_~v o__u__ Y .°u(u ~~~~~ o VII ml~ N 1' I' it ~~e~o mzs ~R / ) ) 1 el 1 g B C ~ ~ b" ipq ", e` ,,, ,,,, ~PV_~~ °A~1 dddi P; ~u r.. i> ">ZY >i I,~~~ ~L~ ~~~ ~~ w F „ {{{{{{~~~~~~ c e e ~~C++ C ~68~ .e ~.e8 6Y~I• ~o• ~io~ iuii iioi ~o el y~~~ ~t~~ ~f~~ E°vl 4646 <KR4 S~ti 4 u4t il'~ ~ ~I ~ Nx~.. ! ~~ ~ a w~ C ~F H H ~ S 'moo' ado ' ore _g. _ __ N n ! ( F F ;, d y=i ~' 'I ~ ' 1 i ~ ~ Ii a J I I , j i I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ° ' ~ I ~ I y ~ a ~ . ~ , i ~ ~~~ ~~iry F >Ae e I , `aiu aai I , ~° l " a ' mjf,rv~ 6 ~m ° u o L~q z Em 1 s $ a a i ~~.c u I ~ i unn« u ou le iu~ un u"'a i i o b ob t C? ; " <<i ~" ~ i~~ ` ~ i a " 6 ~ a pq~ ~ ~ ~ I I y . ks< lp ~ ' I s Y"misn =' a s~n~~ ~ ' = 1 e ~o ke I , I L~ ~e o~ ::o ' <<< g ho ~ ~~ ~oa~~< wa ~~ ~~ ' ~ ~ I iP k ~ N 1~ N i I M ink Wih~ u6 o ~ F p i oLG ~y NLu La ~;i i_a w o puFC y i ~ ' u ~ ;' ~6 V ~e~~ ~ e_~J~ ~ _°~~ ~; ~ ~ o no T z~o~~m T.,-_.° p N !^ „ N ~ II A. .. ~ I m ~ ~ `` l i I « ~a. I ~ ~ ' w <'°'° ° ~ ~ ~ ~ m I I I I o I , I ~~ < e S M , .. - T~ o Y 6I ~~ ~ ~ I I ~ l o ~ e oo o ~tl oe O o ae o ~~ a i v ' ' i O j~ l °a l ' . - - 4 e4 C~ u~ ~' f n ~N€ a°z. ~~.', VZ r., _% .ii _ ___ _ _ ___ I ^ ; r ~ I ~' o ry ` n ' ~ 9 ' " L " Y~C . ~L cc o w +` ~i,E e ~ . e ae ~ ~ W c ~cn F I t i~mnw b~~-. ~ ~V o O Y ~Ln . -~v~k _ ~~ .am~~~ ~~e ¢~ e ~ I ~ n$.' c c> ^ n i n~~n~ L r . ~ n~.'.CE°c i' °oov " i N C ~.. w°w ''° c a 4 a a S q~ .a ~.P. ~~ ° 2s~; ;<oa ~a ' Y c z u aa min ca ~ m° ¢ w< ¢ a ~ ~~ ~ i i ~ n ' a ~ a. `o, _ _ V N n' r , n S y ~ y ~„ y ~u R = a~ ' ~ y ° ' i o a + i. c ao..+ . . . i ,, r w a1 CN¢K~ a~i. a n~u T 6 n ui C ~n Lq< UV K~<OV i W.~LFLi ~.~FUV n LL I ~ ~ i ~ I l aS.Ve ~f p ~ N ! .. 2 ,m ~ T C hNN ~~ ~ m0 1I .0 mm mN~ i rV Y i - - ' i I t ~ ~r •y ~ y ~ I V ' J < Y V S N C~ T ~ b .n < N ~oopoo0o 0000 bLb -_I ~~ .I -- --- - ; ~-- . - -- -_ fs' ( / ( f :t Y. __ ___ ___ :.i? "•T., 1 ~ p N ^ I ~ 6 i i ~ ~ <a ^a ~q ° m i 3 ., N \ u g m ~ a Y Y_ o ~Y ~l..~ou~m PUZ°° 9e FwS o° 22f f 0~ ~ ~ C 997ryy >, VO w } } ~~.V + ~~ J 9 tJ ~ti aL SY ' ~ ~ ~ Y n i I ryry W q~~~ wVE PO ~ V p 6 CS ~ V f x VVVV C V ~ ~a W ~ y y0Y A O l I ~ aE W o a ;r° Q O g 'L~n ` e n~ u w°a ~ E +Ww ~° z ei¢ rv. ~ge-s ° °W a°m F Y fi ~ ~ I ~ i y u u m e I I I I i ~ I xx I ° u uro~ ~ 6 M I ni q ~a. YY ' L Y W 6dni ~ ~~ u~ yYq ~~vY3Ym ~V ~ 9~Ib c~ c ~V ~ ~~ n [~ ~ V 6 Y Y ! 6 ~ O g 0. L g 1. i s .+n =~ g C~ N N C q] L 6~ Y ~v 4 Fu<wp h~ N t, N J Y ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ uv r mNO 00q ln mA~a .rb ~~n I n 0m~rN ~ i rn j O .N~~ Wmi.4 iJf Y N%NNH mp N M n Nn Nhl Y mu~ i i i 1 ~l ma ~ e a ~ ~ ~ ~ n n_ e T a N m m n n ~ 0 m ~in np~n I^ I i nL .~imn n < ~ a ~ ~ K F ~ 4 L i < ~ ~ y a n gee o0e~ ~V~Vn }} oe 3 oe~ee rye ,~ ~n ~~ e eo ~~ ae e ~~ ee a e a ~~ . - .-, [f .f 41 I :i1: .I: .I ,.I :_ I I ~ 1 I I pP~ ~C~ ~S~m CAW' Ji a F fwE u~~ z 1 i ~ I 4 I ~ I I I I i ~ I I ~ II ' I I I ' I III ~ I ~ III r ~I V I h u m I r; . Aar ~I I a y te L 4 rt L r ~ p S r ~ 9 " l A ~ l .~>6 „r 1 V OGu pu a n c , . r 0 .. n N a -. i I Kt .. " ~u u m L cc qr „I _ ~~ ti e' I m ~~W °oi~ o e~ ', etE _ q~. aL y u y V~ '. : B~ ° ~° ~p A~6 , m ~ . . u4u p o a ~C 6 u~ C N x m ~ ~ L ~ ~ b 4S 6 >« v~ o L ~ 6 ~ L ~' I ~ u o o a U ~ ; C C =^ ' V ~ T D ES es+ ~I IR4~ , C 4 W Pa ny .6¢ VV I S u 4n L , W u u ~ ~ ~ II ` I oF0 O ~n in w p i o4644i ~ I ~, ~' .dui II ~ ~~ I~~ ~ ~ ~~I I n V rv o i i .n u~r ~i N I m ~ „ i N „N ~i~ N 6 i 1 li ~i ~ I e w ~ f I Y n M1m I Po u . I On I ~ __ I ~mo n b ~ti o m I i N ~ Z Y N C ~ Y Y q S ~ rv w ~? vin .a 'S O~ • • Y ~ i 1 i ~ 1 ) 1 6¢ W ~ ~I i, i I I , , ~ ; ~' ', I ~ i ~ I I , ~~ , I I ~ ~ I , i ' I ~ ~! , I ~ j i ~~ ~ j ~ ~ < ° a ° ~ ~ ! ~ i ~< ~ s . ~ _; ~; ova ~ ` _ >A I I ~ C ~ I I , I ~ I - nl `u6n a q e BE „ O F ~ ^ ~0~ ~ 6N~ ~ Y{ v N e a'~j o ~Nn ) ~G Gun oY~u~~i'C ~Vttsu n ` p l ° ° Um '~ ~ °65 K _ l Q ., 62 n ~ a L d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ Q m k uEu ~ u I ti o e ~ ~ y ~T Q I o~ ~ cc ~~ ~~ c V a ~ I I ~ ~ si. ~ am~' I i ~ P ~ a t y 66Ey E8EV6 ~ wp w ~ 1 7 N.u m I F I s ~ LtaiCVCV W V ¢<¢N 4 ly u ~ I 1 I i i i __ i i I, I ~ G n ~ e I~ ~ a Ne .n ~ V .n .4 er H N .u a i N q N i i I I I I I I I nb_N I I I e.b.. ,e d,n 1 1 1 1... ~vl a ` I I ~ w I m mm .. « n y~nnm , ~ I I ~ I L I u ui i+ F b ~ 1 V ( ~ ~za - " ~ ~~' - ` - x::a ::.c .--. .... ...- I 1 n 1 1 1 ~ , , a 4' ~~ r r a e~> :. a~= ~. II ~ II ~ II I I i z:~ ~~~' wt Wel I 'I t rv _~ i ~I ~~ -"< ~~ vaa ;o s~ ~" =x Gs` Aga .. oo ~: ~ Eo 0 o- I p~BGo 'e't W n.~n nm u 6pa6M166 _ c i .(u tei4u ~m O N E u C „i uq Cm VVnn ~,e ~ ] ~6 V t~F mYm> YV ul _V `~ I i C i ~ NIY ~I.„ I Nl.q ^I. n ~o ~~N ~ ~~ ~~, ~~ C .e b.o ~n ~a - E3 FS "- YY 1 ) 1 ) ~ i i i <o `~~ ' I oar ' o _u~¢ , 4Y II a>z° !' 6 ~' °u `L~a ~~e+s a° O yV I6 I! s ` ~> q I U ~~B eb$ r~-i 1^i .w ool ~ ~ 1 [~ 1 a~ ad 0~4 W~~ I ~ i i I ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I i I I i i ~, ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I! i I i ~ f ~ °i ~ - ~ ~ mI gm I° I i I I ! Im a~. e ~ I I = i \ C i B0u6 6 oSF o ~1 ~ ~r i ' ~~ I n n6@ ~ ~ ! . w u ~ u n I O 1 ~ i I '. o y 1 u p ~ 1 t q1 p +fm m`l ml N l m I ~^ ~ ~ I I ' I I .; , . o = i I W o t i I ~ m$z ~ ~ . n ~ i ~ a ~t Y 6 ~ I u6 j '' L ~ .~e6 6 ~ i i ~ iy.°i ai t Yi° Q U~w i ~ s i r ~ i 1 ' I i t i ~F 1 l ~ ~ ~ I e m ~~ ~ I ' ~e ~ ~r I I ~ ~ m m m IN r ir v r v i H N i t u~i i I N t ~ f I w ~ W mm <~ N s W o r J r s a ~ Q u ~ 5 1: C L S ~n b o s ' ~ a I vl i "; ao ii I 1 6c ~ PIS ,~ i a I ~.Y ~ i m q ~< ul ~ °°s' "s~ .~~ `~mo` Ao~s.' of W o ~. ~. P g B o 6 V 6 Y ~<h .~,~'~°gea2w°=Ewe I atm z~m~° I ~ ol~ fl. ~,. ~" ~~ k pw~p ~ee CON~~ pae~a c a ^ ? ~ 4 ` I I uo°.~ Ez~' ~~ c4~m ~~ ~oylA eln~. JI~JI ~ I~ m m I 9 i iq ~ I `~ t ;I OED 31. a~.t ~~kt o ."O =m u~~ ~ ~ "Be WVC 4 3L- "e ~b~d~~°i.°~°r 4.A°.° ~~ A~ <~ _~~ I °~a ~E~ ~ ~ T ~;" =oo:oe o..acs~~U~~" i y ,q~d ~ ~ ~i.L 9.Ji ~ ~ P 9~ ~~ - m,~ mi a~ a~~,~ o N~ ~jN ~~ i ~~ ~a ~ ~ , i w4 1% S ~ ~ Oo - ' :c = a~ --- -- ~n M 3 I IC IC I ~ i N I I N G L I I I V I ~ C ~ ~n ~ ~ ' ~ ,. ' I q u IC ~ a ~ I P YC w _ o Ni ~ °iu' u6 g V u u u o ~ I ~ " ' V m.[ o u. V Z o e I p i i u t i u O ] m c fi ~ ne <S up ~ c ~ Gum<. I ~ a r q v A c~a i~[ ..G ~ , ~ a..~.. ,i 'e` „ q c cav ~i ~ ~= .°.ar .° °I° °a° ~~ ° ' i ` ~ W ° ~. .. uVp~ _ o s~ tLtW I. ~ ~° ~ ~" L` ° ° ° 59 yip°as°e e ° e ' . fi e = .. ueAU , -' 6~ CNtt CU LLL 6C N ~ 1 ~~ I I I ~ l I eCc ma I N 9 q I ~ 0 o n~u > G° I I N x"' ° ' ~ mu~u I ~~~ as ~ ~" ' s.. q o =~~~~ ° =~~ j _ II saa . ~r ~>'o ~~~ oa~~~k<s<att w :: : : : ~ v ~ i ~ E ' ; , .i . a ~ j. ~ . I xl<~ I ' N>i»» ~p ~ I I I i , I I ~ I I ~ j I J ! n 'd n ° ~ mm ~ ~~ ~ , s ro i ~ e ~ e ~ u m n r ~e ee "~ m ~ I ~ = l ; oj =i i " i i ; I T , ^ I I I I I ~ ~ I I o o; ~ I ~ '~ S ~ N "~ ~ N.~ rv brvrv 0 0 0°o ~NOO e ~eN e ~oe o p`oo e pee . .. . . ; ; n IY., ~ T ~ ~I ~ - j ~ ~ I ~ I ~ i I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~n ~ ~ ,~ = I q ~ ~ I ow ° a i ~ w S d 3 w S ~e a `` y y ~ME V V V I O C 0 V V F $ C C ~ e w Z o ~ ' N I .. .. .. .. 9 .. N ~ , I `s t S S m ~ N F N S 1 M O 0 ~ :. y ~ ~ _~ •i a ~ ~ ~~ 7 i ~ ~ ~ ~ , 3 ~~ I ~ :: ~ ~ p s ~ O ~ o = W ~ ' 0 ~ > o ~ ~~ i I „ I i ~ ' I ~ Li I ~ ~ °~ F ~ i s o u ' m m ~ 9 ~P ~ ~ g ., Y G w ~ : Y y „ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ± z o ffi z m ~e A ~ '~~ ~ ~ $ Y ~ pp a ~ ~ L M fS ~ S L CN ~I ~ 4 N J $1 ~e a m ~ 6 V F N S N j).~' ~' + 't a o >e , ~ ~: ~ _ ~ ,~ IM n ,,',: -;,~ Pu 4lN© tC 0 P Y Y .i C fQ 2LL0 Yd> 46'5 CCU T S JN PDPC =~h n C Lu Nmmm NvF N 0 u 1 00 E 9.. ' ir~u 6EE o o a o =, . sn V ~C w~.Li yLi ' ., .._ vu Y ~ ` ... o Y _ y W EE Gn6n CLL w G WEWW 9VD W O 7 00 p ty ii YYYY YYY D U dY YO T>.T>. TTT C ' F na na o000 000 .. .. ...~ a Ti T>. pp yy EEE~ EEE L JN 4d na WWWW WWW n 1~6 _ NNS On 0 r G i w n~ NNNN iY• =n -uu np -- Do Y Y rcrcWa P„ c V y y J W J ' d ; ~ W W W c ddna c 1 7 ~u YNU ~~~ y o~ y ` a y Y '1 ~ i Y u u Y w u - y u~ n ~i~ C .. M ~£V~ 99 n. ^ n 4 1 Q6 99 VII LJV ~Yw ^ U 2Q Y~ 9 J V~J 00 Y 0400 + R n y V lDl 1Pi Y P Y E .yi Y n > F~L SQL 9S YRN'6 E ~ Y6 L 4 J 1, NOD NN NNNN Q06 W Nf " wpl mMYINi 1'~ L'LI N N S 1 9 - ~ p tl 1 ^ I n Yr P P P I h ['1 Lt CI I 8 11 a' I 9 6n1 P d91 NNNI CJ :G ni6 L h E m I . 1 ~ ^ ~ ~I dlnNU dW~l m w W I d n'd I CI`. 1^Y~NYr I O M1M' I 'D P 1 ~I ~'1 MMI ao-e MwnNl n I M Y M 1 M w0 M M M 1 I I I W I I V 1 I 1 ~ a ~ i a w I £ i I n II1Lh0 M9~+N N ~ aaaa aEa r I w w n ~ ~ w o 1 I !J w 10 i J a ti n L ¢ a O ~ N u W Q +1 O W T (J M 'S' n H CI YI O ^ . n 9f ~'f 6 ~1 9 N O e M l W J l ~ S g 1 t _. O 99 SQ ~Y p ~Y p 0 ~YO 96 a y O 1 ` e i% ° ` t G U4 C4 E 3° L P m ig C 'w C LL L da un o 63 b Cv EEE E 6 I n p; ¢ P LLLL a N6 P C m ,3 3 1. ml E n P I`d " Cp 3e1• LL I LY P O d I F I W N b ' c Y q I 4 a b N L 1 P~ V O n V f 6 ~ A 3 6 i b `¢ P3 nn. 16T C L LVm nb Ls~ m C i t P !~ 9 •'• 0 T R P ~ ~ u C n w LL U OL p L C S O i 4 Y V j i ' 99 VSP O P%QC• ] u P6 Pv a o a C2 wP c m u ¢ vc L°."~ s nuen~b m ~. .U.m ^ 9a mm L 6m Pb. 9 ~ 3 br Um LL•-£2 p e. it F T mm~v +W1 v V -~6 J w P l y [ E L c _ ~ 3 P 9 O6 ~ 1- q._ LL n_ W > W c m n I!i i 4.D ~ _ • ^TG~ • ^V 0 Od4nvp L V- QY / ¢O w h u LL m LL _ vJ JmJ a M7•+ L mLC.+UL SOIL b0 abwm D mU ~+O•" .p .. y d ^ ~ li~m O£ JCf4 3 ^JSNJI J W Pml n 'IPPI P £ .C i ' MPmI ~1 9 m.~Npn Y~ I' ¢ ~ m s nmTl m I a danann Im PI P • I M n I (11N+V~m•• I O 1 A P P PI ~ M ^ MM• W I(1 i M I 1 I I 2 I I 1 m I W I I w i ` i u i ¢~ a r -a Yl mNb)N ( Ln WNN4: YI .CL LL W n W YI £ F W J K S A ~. a J ~ ¢ a u ~ w z T m o 0 Y1 W 3 m Q LL U W 6 W K 1 £ M1 UI 5 P R 0 M !J ry CI t/ fl ~ W P P ti h P P P P f ~ ~ ` 1 I Q O 9O p E 1 01611 O 1 y ~ y ~ I y 1 y Q O@OVI VO T J •) ) ) ) ) ) ', 1 1 . ~ I 1 M` f~- E ' -d 2 C 1 P 2 O EC YW up 4 VE )i N¢ LL Od W G Y f ~~ U ~ ~ F J UO N N Gq f0 U ^ Ud Fn ~G a In 1Y& NF O~µ GJ Z..W F O ~ J n W N Q LL r +S FJW LL W _ n IU Ii £ 2 .. 4 P W f i i '~ c WN rL N6 -. _ ~.. ~ 4 C' W i• ] LL~F ly ~ ~ r ^ il^ d~ d W~ y Yr 4 1jt 2 n W N • 1 W lir u F~ ~ _ E LL 5^ M^ W ^ W^ x p 4 U 9 t 9 ` L 0 J N Y J 30 DO LLC ~¢ p SOQ P - ¢ ¢r r~J ~~ O OW yj~ rt FL ~L F £ LLL J ~ W N I 6 N < S P O 5 0 ~ N 1~ L N } 0 r P ^ (Y 1 Y P 5 0' 6 d' I (Il+i ~ 1 ~ M '~ K • W I K M 2 I W I £ 1 d I r 1 OM1r was 4 I W W r h U W 2 ^ N N a N Q O Y W LL r h P W PN ~ 51 ~(' r II )' g 9~ 7 / E; ~v: ~~ r) ~) ~) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 ) I I / ) 1 ) ) 1 1 ~, ~ ~: pp . t5~ 1 q "!1 Str ~f' V. b li ~, q L ry 'I 2 . LLD >. o ~a z c.. G ~rs E.. f- E U oy vo K Pq 10 m n W n ~I m ~ e n~ u„ i.`. ~ " ~ ~ d Po ¢ 1- 9 N I I- r• P"~ YC N .IYG U4 0 v (GS ~. W ~LtwiP WZ'm 0 O ^ KYO 42Z i[ N G ~ °x ~ u u 3 a~ u > s" JQ JS f _v i« Zj OLL'£ C o~ i 4 J In S P 10 O f I G IP l F .r ' y ~ u i 7 rs I I n w u I >c w tt J 17 Z i O H N N U1 G 4 W LL O u 4 1 L rc N O WS 1 ..e ^6 JM u`r~ 1 6P LL6 F L P W^ -?WP ~ T 2~ ¢.. ~ E~f ~ ai u° ~ d z a y . S~g u 00 LL RJWO Q J T 61- W¢ 0o wwe~d ~e sar•x P ~ d N y m Na O 6 F y® I RAUC80 L4CAl10tlGH Pffi PAOlHCTIGH DIHTRZCS DATE; July 25. 1989 T0: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief ' SUHJECT: Poothill Fire Protection District Adjourned AEqulax Meeting Minutes Recommendation Receive and file the minutes o£ the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Foothill Pire Protection District Board of Directors held on June 29, 1989. Back sad On June 29, 1989, the Pire District Hoard held an Adjourned Regular Meeting. The attached minutes record is a true and accurate reflection of actions taken during said meeting. The Vice President and Secretary of the Board of Directors have signed the minutes and affidavit certifying the accuracy of the board minutes. It is aoorooriate action for the Rancho Cucamonga Pire Protection District Governing Boazd to receive and file the minutes of the last public meeting held by the Foothill Fire Board of Directozs. Respectfully submitted, L. Dennis Michael. Pir ief LDM/rer 19 •"roe: ,, x: ~j .5~€ Y `:_L9` 1/ 1 C~l'rIPIC112206 OP MIHDTSS We, Lane Matsuno, Vice-President and L. Dennis Michael, Secretary, do hereby certify that the attached meeting minutes are a true and accurate reflection of the actions taken at the adjourned regular meeting of the Foothill Fire Protection District Board of ' Directors on June 29, 1989. V ''-Y "'~ ne Natauno, V ce-PreB ent Hoard of~Directors~Q~ ., r.1 ~Z~e3~i7i1lls M, ~,~/ i Board of Directors /rb s J ~° ,., ;,F .: s,. ~,;. F -~ Foothill Fire Protection District l Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 CALL TO ORDER The adjourned regular meeting of the Foothill Fixe Protection District Board of Directors was called to order at 7:05 p.m. Board members present: Mr. Amodt, Mi. Lyons, Mr. Metsuno, Mra. Quintana. Absent: ROLL CALL Mr. Eggleston. Also present: Secretary Michael, Recording Secretary Robin Brock and legal counsel, Warren Divan. Vise-President, Mr. Mateuno, conducted the meeting in President Eggleaton's absence. Mr. Matsuno led the Pledge of Allegiance. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Chief Michael stated that at the County Board of Supervisors' meeting, the vote was unanimous to approve the formation of Foothill Fire Protection District F~ as a subsidiary district of the City of Rancho INFORMATIONAL 1 Cucamonga effective July 1, 1989. ITEMS Chief Michael also noted there were eight successful candidates for the Pire Caotain Dromotional ellvibility list. He commended Chief Mayfield, Chief Corcoran and members of the suppression staff for their efforts in providing a successful examination process. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, to approve APPROVAL the regular meeting minutes of June 8, 1989. OP MINUTES The vote wag: AYEB - Mz. Amodt, Mr. Lyons, Mr. Matsuno, NOES - None, ABSENT - Mr. Eggleston, ABSTAINED - Mzs. Quintana Mrs. Quintana abstained due to her absence at the June 8th meeting. Mrs. Quintana requested a correction to the May 19th meeting minutes. She noted page 10, paragraph 4, which stated, "in the future, on EEOC looking et not only women...etc." It should read, "under BEOC guidelines". ~O Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 Page Two 1 a ~ EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Chief Michael noted that Resolu is an advertised public hearing. duly published and posted. Chief a brief overview to the board. EMS Systems Design provided a calculations done to support the of $4,10 per month. Lion No. 06-06-89 Notices have been Michael then gave Mike Williams of summary of the special tax levy Mr. Matsuno opened the public hearing on Resolution No. 06-06 -89. Seeing no response, he closed the public hearing. Mr. Lyons asked for discussion of Resolution No. 06-06-89 prior to a motion for approval. Mr. Lyons asked that "non-profit organizations" be exempt from RESOLUTION the annual levy of a special tax for funding paramedic NO. 06-06-89 services. He felt the majority of "non-profit" organizations within the community were churches. After some discussion by the board, legal counsel Warren Diven, and consultant Mike Williams, Mr. Lyons made a motion to exempt non-profit organizations f~ from the business establishments located within the District. The motion died due to lack of a second. Following further discussion, Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by Mrs. 4uintana, to change the name of the uiscricc from Foothill Fire Protection District to Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District within the body of the ballot measure. The vote was: AYES - Mr, Amodt, Mr. Matsuno, Mrs. Quintana, NOES - Mr. Lyons, ABSENT - Mr. Eggleston Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by Mrs. Quintana, to read Resolution No. 06-06-89 by name and title only and to waive further reading. The vote was: AYES - Mr. Amodt, Mr. Matsuno, Mrs. Quintana, NOES - Mr. Lyons, ABSENT - Mr. Eggleston Chief Michael then read Resolution No. 06-06-69 by name and title only: R Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 Page Three ._., I i 4 ~+ i RESOLUTION NO. 06-06-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TBE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COIIN'TY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OP RESOLUTION CALIFORNIA, PROPOSING THE LEVY OP A SPECIAL NO. 06-06-89 TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT TO FUND A DISTRICT PROVIDED PARAMEDIC PROGRAM; PROPOSING AN INCREASE IN THR DISTRICT'S APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT; CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OP A SPECIAL ELECTION; AND REQUESTING TBE BOARD OP SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN HERNARDINO TO CONSOLIDATE SAID ELECTION WITH TB8 GENERAL ELECTION TO BE Hffi.D NOVEMBER 7, 1989 Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by Mrs. Quintana, to approve Resolution Nc. 06-06-89. The vote was: AYES - Mr. Amodt, Hr. Matsuno, Mrs. Quintana, NOES - Mr. Lyons, ABSENT - Mr. Eggleston FINANCE COMMITTEE Chief Michael noted that this is second reading of Ordinance No. 18, and stated that the corrections ORDINANCE ware made to the typographical error noted during NO. 16 the June 8th meeting. ordinance No .V V18 by name and title onlyV and to waive further reading. The vote was: All Present. - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston Chief Michael then read Ordinance No. 18 by name and title only: ORDINANCE NO. 16 ORDINANCE OF THE ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO CODNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OP A SPECIAL TAX 1N HELLO-BOOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICF NO. 85-1 POR FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 Mrs. Quintana moved, seconded by Mr. Lyons, to adopt Ordinance No, 18, authorizing the levy of a special tax in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No 05-1 for fiscal year 1989-90, Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 Page Four i f!CC _..F A roll call vote followed: AYES: Amodt, Lyons, Matsuno, Quintana NOES: None ABSENT: Eggleston Chief Michael requested moving Item E.6 before Item E.2 on the agenda in consideration of legal counsel Warren Diven. Chief Michael gave an overview of his staff report regarding Resolution Nos. 03-06-89, 04-06-89, and RESOLUTION OS-06-69. NOS: 03-06-89 Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, to approve 04-06-89 Resolution Nos. 03-06-89, 04-06-89, and OS-06-89. OS-06-89 RESOLUTION N0. 03-06-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OP DIRECTORS OF T~ FOOTHILL FIRS PROTECTION DISTRICT. COUNTY OF SAN BHRNARDINO, STATE OP CALIFORNIA. APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BDDGET POR CO!@lONITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 POR FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 RESOLUTION NO. 04-06-89 A RESOLUTION OF THS HOARD OF DIRECTORS OP THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT POR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RESOLUTION NO. OS-06-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OP DIRECTORS OF THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OP CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL T.AX POR A COlAfUNITY-FACILITIES DISTRICT The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent ~:r. EyvleatO:. Alex Ahumda, Admistrative Services Officer, noted this item is an advertised public hearing, He then RESOLUTION gave an overview of his staff report. NO. 01-06-89 Mr. Matsuno opened the public hearing and seeing b lic hearing. no response, closed the pu (~ j/ Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 Page Five i f 3 I ~1 .J Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mzs. Quintana, to approve Resolution No. 01-06-89, adjusting projected revenue and redesignating budgeted funds. RESOLUTION N0. 01-06-89 RESOLDTION NO. 01-06-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FOOTHILL FIRH PROTECTION DISTRICT, COONTY OP SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADJOSTING PROJHC'TED REVENIIB AND REDESIGNATING BODGETED FUNDS The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by Mr. Lyons, approval to declare the District's existing GTE Electronic DECLARING Rey System 12/36 Telephone System as surplus property. TELEPHONE SYSTEM AS The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent SURPLUS - Mr. Eggleston PROPERTY Chief Michael gave background information regarding the amendments to the JPA for general liability insurance. RESOLUTION Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, to approve NO. 02-06-89 Resolution No. 02-06-89, amending the Joint Exercise of PnWP.YR Agreement for general liability insurance. RESOLUTION NO. 02-06-89 A RESOLOTION OP THE BOARD OP DIRECTORS OF THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTLON DISTRICT, COIINTY OF SAN B$RNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AOTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN A JOINT EXERCISE OP POWERS AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN SELF-INSURANCE PORPOSES AND APPROVING THE AMENDED JOINT POWER OP AOTHORITY AGREEMENT The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by M:. Lyons, to adopt the Foothill Fire Protection District General Fund (Account No. 933) preliminary budgets for fiscal year 1989-90 in the amount of $5,629,863.40. The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NGNE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston V..S Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 Page Six F~ i Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by Mr. Lyons, to approve SCHEDULING OF the scheduling of the public hearing for consideration PUBLIC REARING of adopting the final budget £or fiscal year 1969-90 FOR ADOPTION for September 6, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at 9161 Baseline OF GENERAL FUND Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Mr. Amodt moved, seconded by Mr. Lyons, to approve the execution of a Comprehensive Memorandum of Understanding between the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Firefighters' Association and the Foothill Fire Protection District for the term July 1, 1988 thru June 30, 1990. The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston Mr. Matsuno stated that Mr. Eggleston had requested that he serve on the transition teak force and would MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SUBSIDIARY DISTRICT TASK FORCE r } (L _3 v.. v. u.w,....... oll The hnarA ~~.... arpc-.._ .._. ..____.._ __ ___. concurred. Mr. Matsuno called for a 10 minute break at 8:20 p.m. The board then recessed to closed session to meet for the purpose of discussing labor relations matters with the designated representative. The meeting reconvened at 9:13 p.m. Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, to add to the meeting agenda; Consideration of Salary Adjustments for Certain Classif icatiens. The Vote Was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr, ~~9gloctpn ~~ RECESS CLOSED SESSION SALARY ADJUSTMENTS Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1989 Page Seven fM _.s I) J Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, to approve a 58 cost of living increase for certain classifications, ie: Fire Chief, Division Chief, Administrative Services Officer, Fire Safety Supervisor (Deputy Fire Marshal), Fire Safety Analyst and Maintenance Officer, effective July 1, 1989. The vote was: All Present - AYR, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, that all classifications of the District may participate in DEFERRED the District's Deferred Compensation program at their COMPENSATION discretion. PARTICIPATION The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston DIRECTOR BUSINESS DIRECTOR No items submitted. BUSINESS DIRECTOR ITEMS - NON-AGENDA DIRECTOR Directors Amodt, Lyons, Matsuno and Quintana took ITEMS a moment to acknowledge their appreciation and to NON- thank Chief Michael and the staff of Foothill Fire AGENDA Liao i~L iu• tiro is Neel o_fu.Le. Chief Michael, on behalf of the District, presented each board member with one year and five year pins in appreciation of the board. Chief Michael stated that a joint meeting with the City Council will be scheduled. This meeting will be to present the minutes of the June 29th meeting and recognize the Hoard of Directors. The meeting will be followed by a reception in honor of the board. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS There were no communications from the public. FROM THE PUBLIC ~7 . Adjourned Regular Meeting Board of Directors June 29, 1969 Page Eight ADJOURNMENT At 9:30 p.m., Mr. Lyons moved, seconded by Mr. Amodt, to adjourn the adjourned regular meeting of the Foothill Fire Protection District Eoard of Directors. ADJOURNMENT The vote was: All Present - AYE, Noes - NONE, Absent - Mr. Eggleston ~~~ Lane Matsuno, Vice-President . Dennis Michael Pire i f Secretary, Board of Direc rs /rb ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 2, 1989 TOz Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BYZ Bonnie Cabrinha, Special Districts Analyst SUBJECT: Authorization of an amount not to exceed 5Z•BD per reel for t- a c~ ollection o~ the lev o a spec~l tax wlthln Commun ty Facr14Y[ea Fire District 88-1. It is recommended that City Council authorize the attached contract for an amount not to exceed $2.00 per parcel for the collection of the levy of a special tax within the City's Community Facilities Pire District 88-1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: °f C~]O^ oo~nn nF •hn t'alifnrnia l.nvernmPnt Cn[Ie rP.OUl[e8 that whenever any special charges or assessments are to be collected by the County there shall be added to the amount of the special charges or assessments an amount fixed by agreement between the entity imposing the charge or assessment,,//a//nd the County. R pee 1 su~ tte , erry B. Fu//J(J(ylwood eputy City Manager JBF/BC/kmo Attachments: 4 sets of contracts from the County uC San Bernardino ~9 CONTRACT FOR SRS COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The County of Sao Barnasdino shall collet[ special •saeumen[s for the under-•iansd: 1. Ths followinH eharHaa shall be wda for the collet eion of apeeial auaumanb or apeeial auaus:enS taxer (a) Auussasnts for any die erict~ •paeial di KricC zone or improvaa:aot die trier Shareof: Not to exceed Sl•00 for each parcel DaariDH aueh:aD ~sauamant. ~r ' (b) Special uaausiant or apeeial uaeument taxes levied upon any Lnd er esal property Dj any ciq~ eounty~ district ar other public eorpora4ioo~ 'officer or body: Not .to exceed $1.00 for each parea1;baaridH web an •nsauant. (c) pursuant to Covarnwek; COga ~Seetioa 19104. ouch chary shall b• added to the amwnt; of~'~tha uau assn[ for each parccl DwriaH such am uauaunt.' 1. This contract wy ba eacminatad for any anwinH fiscal year prior co Juna 1, or eha praeadinH ~is{ea1 yue Dy Hivina tan days notice in vritinH to the ocher part~.~ I~ rmnm nP V1N HRaN.aD2ND Atenti nar Diu : -=w°-~ Clark of•[ha Hoard of Suparyiaora By: _ Dated: Attest: By: (Title) Datadi (4/B4: PropTaxFns) Dy i Unairwn Hoard of Supnrviwn Dated• AHwcyi RANCHO CVCAMONGA CFD SB-1 IIys (Title) DaNd i ' ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT ORTE: August 2, 1989 T0: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dietiict Board of Directors FAOM: Duane A. Baker, Sr. Administrative Aaeistant~~ sue.TECT: C ids at ion to ABBClnd Old Resol ti a d Adooti n f N Resolution Settino Porth the Time end Date of Aancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board Meetince Staff recommends that the Diet [Set Board reerind Re6o lut ion No. 01-07-86 adopted by the Foothill Pira Protection District, and Sn its place adopt the attached Resolution, PD 89-01, setting forth the time and date of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 0oard meetings ae the first and third Nedneedays o£ the month, beg inn ing at 7:30 p. m. at the Lions Perk Community Center, located at 9161 BACKGROUND This measure to rescind ens old resolution, 01-07-86, and adopt the new resolution ie to bring the meeting dates and times of the Rancno cucemonga Fire Protection District in line with the regular meetings of the City Council. DAe:jle 69-543 3~ ABSOLUTION NO. PD B9-O1 A RBSOLUTION OP BOARD OP DIR%CTOAS OP THH RANCHO COCAMONGA FIRB PROT&CTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OP SAN B%RNARDINO, STATB OF' CALIFORNIA, HSTABLISHING A TINH AND PLACH POR HOLDING RHGULAR MB&TINGS OP THB BOARD OP DIA%CTORS AND R%P%ALING ABSOLUTION NO. 01-07-86 WHERHAS, Section 54954, Government Code, State of California requires the legis lative body of a local agency Go provide the public a time and place for holding regular meetings. NOW, TH%REFOR%, BR IT R%SOLV%D that the regular meetings of the Board of Directors of the Rnncho Cucamonga Pire Protecticn District shall 6e held on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 7:30 p.m. at the Lions Park Community Center, located at 9163 ease Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, beginning on August 16, 1989. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION IISTRICT STAFF REPORT ~~`~ DATE: August 2, 1989 );,: ;;:a. TO: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Board ;~, ~b,;i FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief SUBJECT: ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR GOVERNING BOARD OF ~~'~ THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ! RECOMMENDATION: Consideration to elect a board president, vice president and a secretary for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Board. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 1989, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District was established through the formation of a subsidiary fire district to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, the City Council will assume the role as the fire districts governing body, establishing itself as the Fire District Board of Directors regarding all actions on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Pursuant to the Health and Safety Code, Section 13853, (Attached as Exhibit "A"), the Board has 60 days under cer- tain criteria to elect from its members a president, vice president and a secretary. Once the Board elects its offi- uece, Lice nuaiu may wuLiuue Lu L.>uou..L Lu~.u~es .... ..~..~,.~ of the subsidiary fire district. ANALYSIS: Under the City's structure, it would seem appro- priate to elect from your members a president and vice president. For efficiency and organizational coordination, the mayor and mayor pro-tem respectively would be logical choices and also be consistent with the legislative organi- zation of the redevelopment agency. Additionally, rather than electing the fire chief as your secretary, it would seem logical to elect the City's clerk to fulfill the role of district secretary. The role of the secretary is to take minutes, certify resolutions of the Pire Doard and other duties which are similar to the City Clerks function. Respectfully submitted, ~~ L. Dennis Micha 1, Fir ief RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE: Auguei 2, 1989 TO: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Boardo /n~ FRORx Duane A. Bnker, Sr. Administrative Assistant D A~~ SDBJECT: Anm torment of Dleirict Treasurer Staff recommends that the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Hoard adopt the attached Resolution BD 89-02, Ln accordmce with Section 13854 of the California Realth and Safety Code, to appoint the Administrative Services Director to serve in the permanent capncity ea Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Currently the Administrative Services Director serves as the Treasurer t0 the Redevelopment Agency, sod holds the necessary bonding required by State law for this poet. This appointment will replace the current District Treasurer who hsa been the Treasurer for the County of San eernnrdino. DAB:jle 89-544 3~ RESOLUTION NO. PD 89-02 A RESOLUTION OF T~ BOARD OP DIR$CTOAS OP THE RANCHO CDCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPOINTING A DISTRICT TREASUARR WHEREAS', Section 13&54, Health and Safety Code, State of California, requires the District adopt a Reeoluiion appointing a District Treasurer ocher than the county Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the District Treasurer shall draw checks or warrants to pay any demands which have been audited and approved in the manner proscribed by the District Board. q NOW, THEREFORE ~~ BS IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby appoints the Adminisiretive Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ae the District Treasurer, who shall ba authorized by the Board to draw checks and warrente to pay any demands which have been audited and approved Ln Che manner proscribed by the District Board, and further be it resolved that the Dietrlet Treasurer shall receive no compeneat ion.