The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989/09/20 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wedaesdaya - 7:30 p.m. September 20, 1989 lions Pant Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga City Couocilmembcn Dennis I, Stout, ar.y.. Pamela J. Wright, cn,wnT.~nEer - Deborah N. Brown, .w.ro. ran.. Chvles J. Buquet, conrnnumDt. William J. Alexander, co.nrl~mnnDr. - •r lack Lam, Orv Afunuae. James L. Markman, o:~ nrro.ne.r Debra 1. Adams, cur co-..r City OIRu: 9g9-1831 bona Park: 9S0-3 US 1~~~+~ City Council Agenda O September ]0, 1989 PAGE 1 All iia• auDCiticd for the City Council Agenda cmt be i¢ writi¢g. TDC dadlinc for •ubciiiing these ita• i• 5:00 p.c. on the Wdnad•p prior to the east ivg. The Citp Clerk' Off ice raecivse cll each iteu. A. GLL TO ORDER _. Plsdgs of Alleyia:~ca .o Flay. 2. Ro11 call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout , Brawn _, and Wright E. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No It ema Submitted. C. COMMIMI GTIONS PROM TE6 PUBLIC TDic i• the tie cad pLp for the gc¢cr•1 public to cddrHe the Cltp Council. Stab Lr prohibits the Citp Comcil froc •ddrsui¢g cap Lmc not pnviou•lp includcd o¢ the Agcad•, ~ TDC Clip cnuacll up ncciq betLOap •¢d ut the utter for • sub wqucnt acting. CoacnL •re to be licitcd to five cinute• pcr Ladlvidu•1. p. CONSRrf CALENDAR The [ollorinq Con eat Glcad•r Stae •rc cxpcetW to Dc ~ routivs sad ¢oo-co¢trovcrc lcl. Thq will Da •ctcd upon by the Council •L oa tiac without dt•cu uiw. Anp i[a ap be rewvcd Dp • Councilcabcr or cccbcr of the audicnec for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutee: Au goat 16, 1989 (BUquet absent) 2. Approval Of Warrants, Reg later Noe. 9/6/89, 9/13/89 and ] Payroll ending 8/31/89 for the total amount of 54,104,878.10. ..• ,.~.ywvar ~ uywer canoe rrom rraca• rear •yee~ay co 11 Fie cal Ycer 1989/90. 4. Approval of final 1988/89 Budgetary Adjuctmcnec. 13 s'. City Council Agenda ~~~,yl~ September 20, 1989 PAGE 2 8. Approval to authorize the advert ieing of the "Notice 15 Snv iti.ng Rida" for the Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Project, located at the nort heaet corner of Haven Avenue and Fourih Street, to be funded from Beaut if icfltion Fu nde Account No. 21-4647-8719 )FY 89/90). RESOLUTION NO. 89-614 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE GATEWAY ENTRY MONUMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST COAN£R OP FOURTH STREET AND HAVEN AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTNORIE ING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERH TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 6. Approval to authorize the refunding of 1988/89 Landscape 20 A9aee9menie - Caryn Planned Community. ' 7. Approval of updated current City Policy and Procedure 21 for various Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance Dietr Lc[e within the City. 8. Approval of Appsal of Environmental T.aaeaament and 46 Conditional Uee Permit 89-19 - Univaraal Arcade - of the Planning Comoisaion'e approval of raqueai to eeiabliah an arcade Ln a leaved apace of B80 equnra feat within an ex feting commercial center on 1.26 acres of land in the General Connlero Lal District, located et the eouthweat corner of Azrow Route and Ma lven Avenue - APN 209-041- :51. (COatinued frw eaptewber 6, 19@9) RESOLUTION NO. 89-406 4~ A PE SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY ' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVERSING TH% ACTION OP THE PLANNING CONMISSIPH AND DENYING CONDITIONAL U9E PERMIT 89-19 FOR AN ARCADE TO OPERATE IN AN EAZ ST ING COMMERCIAL CCNTER ON 1.26 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENEML CUMMEACZAL OSSTAZCT; IM'AT'BO AT TP.E SOUTHWEST COP.NER OP ~ ARROW ROUTE AND MALVEN AVENUEr AND MAEING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THSRBOP - APN 209-041-61 n{ ". u. City Council Agenda ~~~~+~ September 20, 19 D9 PAGE 3 9. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 50 II for the ptopos ed Wilson Avenue Street Improvements from Amer by et Street to Archibald Avenue and adoption of the attachetl P.e solut ion and is euance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 89-415 6! A PESOLVTION OF myE CITY COUNC?L OF TP3? CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSVANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED WILSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHI DALD AVENGE 30. Approval of Community Trail Fence Standards. 63 11. Approval to award the Etiwanda Cobbleeto ne CurD 68 Improvement Project located on the we et Bide of Ei iwanda, north of Victoria Street (Alternate D) •to Eay District Paving, Incorporated, for the amount of $27,742.10, to be Eu nded with Beautification Punde, Account No. 21-4647- 8822 (FY 88/89 and 89/90). 12. Approval to award [he Tratfic SLgnal and Safety Lighting I 70 ~ at the intersections of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street and Archibald and Lemon Avenuee to Hovey Electric for the amount of $192, 177.00, to be funded with SD 325 Fund, ~ ..____ _ ..__. -_ . ... .... ... .. .... .,.-~, .arcd L~li 13. Approval to release Agreemen[ for Postponement of CCSR's 72 ICO 89-155) for Tract 13248, located on the south aide of Highlantl Avenue between Archibald and Hermosa Avenuee. RESOLUTION NO. 89-416 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF nANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OP APPROVAL OP CCSA'S FOR TRACT 13268 14. Approval to accept an Offer of Dedication for Streit i4 ~ ._ ____ _____ed .._ _.._..... .lace Q7 Eaat ... ai, a • ^ v ~ north/aouth street locatsd eaet of Nlil ikon Avenue on the south elde of Jersey Boulevard. ~.J~, City Council Agenda Septeadxr 20, 1989 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 89-417 ~5 A PESOLUT ION OP TfiE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 27 POOT DEDICATION ON BOSTON PLACE AS OPPERBD FOR STREET, HIGHWAY AND RELATED PVAPOSES 15. Approval to offet a Gtant Oeed (CO 89-156) to the State ~~ of California for a port lon of Weet Beryl Park to be used for future Poothill Freeway Alignment. RESOLVTION NO. 59-418 ~8 A RESOLUT ZON OF TBE CZTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF MNCHD CUCAHONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING GRANT DEED N0. 0946 TO T'FI8 STATE OF CALIPOANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEEDING A PORTION OP WBST BERYL PARE TO THE STATE 16. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 2'~CO BB-089) for 79 the Traffic Signals at the intersect LOn of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue and authorize the transfer of funds in the amount o[ $2,938.00 from TDA Article B - Account No. 12-4637-8903 into TDA Artlele 8 - Account No. 12-4637-8708. 17. Approval to open escrow wish Andrew Barmakian for 8~ transfer of remnant right-of-wsy along Base Line Aoad west of Btlwanda Avenue end authorise the City Engineer to execute ell necaoary docueronG. RESOLUTION NO. E9-119 81 A RESOLVTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANZA, DIRECTING TN8 EEECUTION OP A CRANT DEED OF CEASAIN REAL PROPERTY HEREIN pESCRIBED TO THE BAPMARIAN COMPANY 18. Approval to open ewrow wLLh LuL P. Mon, et. al., end 84 Loveland Bapt let Chutch end Chr isi ian Gnter and Piret Bapt Set Church of North Fontana, a California i i Corporstlon, for pureheea of land at 13496 and 13053 Bnee Line Road, respect Lvely, to obtain iha right-of-wry for the Bue Llne Aoad Widening Pzoject between Victoria Park Lane end Interatete 15 for $18,300.00 and 59,500.00 raspeeL ively, plus escrow coati of 55,000.00, to W paid trom Systems Fees Recount No. 21-4637-8770-4606-4117 - APN'• 227-131-08 and 1300-011-06 rupect ively. ,+~,;y'r ,Fy city council Agenda September 20r 1989 PAGE 19. Approval to Order Ghe Annaxat ion to Landscape Maintenance 85 Diet rlet No. 7 and Sirast Llghtinq Maintenance District Noa. 1 and 2 for Tract 13565-2 Chru -4r located on the north aide of 24th St zee[ between Wardman Bullock Road and san Sevains Serest. submitted Dy Standard Pacitie of orange County. RESOLUTION NO. 89-620 86 A RBSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THH ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN THRRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTAICI NO. 7 AND STAHBT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13565-1 THRV -d 20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 91 Security and ordering the Annexntion tc Landscnpe Maintenance Dietrlct No. 3 and Serest Lighting Maintenance District Noa. 1 end 6 Eor MDR 89-07, located on the southeeat corner of 9th Street end Nelma Avanua, 9ubmiited by A1Dert W. Daviea. RESOLUTION NO. 89-421 92 A RESOLUTION O! TmI CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY APPROVING OP RANCHO CVCAMONOAr CALIFORNIA = IMPROVEl~NT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY vns areno nnrvrnowsvm a ve w± .. RESOLUTION NO. B9-622 93 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMGNOAr CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TX8 ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINT$NANC6 DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO9. 1 AND 6 POA MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEN 89-07 96 21• Approval to execute Improvsmsnt Agreemen0. Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Diet[ict No. 3 and Street Llghtinq Maintenance Dietrlct Noa. 1 and 6 for DR E7-6B, located i i i ~ on She south aide Ot 9tR Serest beiNeen Rellman Avanua end Archibald Avenue, euboltted by Sebutieno lilpl :+r ~. City Council Agenda September 20r 1959 PAGE IESOLUTION NO. 89-623 97 A AESOLVT ION OP THE CITY COVNCYL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CDCAMONGAr CALIPOANIAr APPROVING IMPROVElDINT AGRBEIiENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. E7-48 RESOLUTION NO. E9-426 98 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIAr ORDERIN(: THE ANNBEATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 POR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. E7-48 22. Approval to execute Improvesient Agreement Extension Por: Pnrcel Mso 10771. located on the south aide of wiLon 101 Avenue Detween Canistel Avenue end Deor Creek, submitted by criaebY Development. RESOLUTION NO. 89-124 103 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCAr CALIPORNIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY fOA PARCEL MAP 10771 tract 13273. located on the aoutheeet corner Milliken 104 Avenue and Mountain View Drive. submitted by western I Pronsrtfee. ABSOLUTION NO. E9-626 106 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNC IL OP TXE CITY O- RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALI-ORNIA. APPROVING SMPAOVEtBNT AGREEMENT EYTSNSION AND IMPROVEMENT 56CURITY [OR TMCT 13273 Tract 13411. located on SLrra VUt• Street between 107 ~ in S r nd Red Hill Co nt Club D 1 defttsd D I i i Allmerk. Incormrsted. 109 RESOLUTION NO. 89-627 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TFR CITY OP AAIICHO CUCAMOIIGAr CALIPORNIAr APPROVING IMPROVEMRNT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT 96CURITY !OR TMCT 13511 ,.~Z~': *~ City Council Agenda SaptemWr 20, 1989 PAGE 23. Approve! to accept Improvement, Ae !tote of Bonda and Notice of Complet ion for: Tract 12525 and 12761. located on the watt side of Center 110 v nu w t Ttact 1252$ ', Releaee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 90,500.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 9,050.00 TYdCt 12741 Releaee: Paithful Performance Bond (Street) $10'!,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 10,'700.00 ABSOLUTION NO. R9-628 111 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ACCEPTING THE PVHLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT NOS. .12525 AND lL/41 IUYU AU1'MUN1r1N(: TNB P1LLN0 VP A NOTLC6 OP COMPLETION POR TN6 NORR Tract 11549-1. located on the east •ide of Etiwanda 112 Avenue. between Summit Avenue and Bichlend Avenue Faithful Performance BonC (Street) $189,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. E9-429 113 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALI POANIA, ACCEPTING Tig PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TMCT 11569-1 AND AUTNOR22IN6 THE PILING O! A NOTICE OP i COMPLETION POR THE NORA ,: .,:>v ; . *A City Council Agenda Saptemher 40, 1989 PAGE Tract 14663. located on the nth 'd f Nth 1 d 114 V ew i t cal' Peek P` a nd A tl P k Cam t Releeee: Patthful Performance Bond (Street) $i1B,00D.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ ll,BOD.OD ABSOLUTION NO. 89-630 115 A RESOLUTION 08 TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12663 AND AUTHORIZING TH8 PILING OF A NOT YCB OP COMPLBTION POR TEDq MORA 116 Release: Patthful Perforlos:.es Bond (SirNt) $128,000.00 Acwpt: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Strwt) $ ]4,800.00 AE80LUTION NO. 89-431 11] OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINO TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TMCT 13556 AND AUTHORIZING TFR FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR TSIB ipAR Tract 13560. located on the west aide of Netherlands View I18 LOOD at Mt. ~9Grlina Court and Mt. Laawn Court Relww: Patthful Performance Bond (Street) $ 65,000.00 Accept: MalnNnsnw Guarantee Bond (strNt) $ 6,500.00 ~ AESOL'JTION NO. 89-;34 li9 A RESOLUTION OF T22E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEMENT9 FOR TRACT 13560 AND AUTHORYLING THE iiLING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION -OR THE MORE ~., yi, ~ 5l *r r. l., Ciiy Council Agenda September 20, 1989 PAGE Tract 12940. located on the east aide and vest side of 120 tlill~iew Looo at Santiago Peak Couri R@1@eee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 83,500.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 8,350.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-433 121 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP MNCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOPN IA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT 12940 AND AVTNOAI2I NG THE PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOA THE NORA T a t 12937 to tad on the t aide and eat •Ld of 122 H'll 'ew Loo L Mt R i r C t end Nt Hood Court Releaw: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $125,600.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantu Bond (Street) $ L7,560.OD RESOLUTION NO. 89-434 123 .. ..... ...... __ T- II wOrii.li ur lnn ciu'r OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPAOVE[~NTS POR TRACT 12937 AND AVTHOAIZINO THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THE HORA ~acL 12942. located on the north aide and south a de of 124 H illYiaw I.ooo et Teton Peak CaQlirt and Pinnacle Peak Court Releao: Pa ithful Performance Bond (Strut) S 94r~0.00 Accept: Maintenance GuariOtN Bond (Street) $ 9,400.00 ~ i i RESOLUTION NO. 89-335 125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIOS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TMCT 12942 AMO AUTNORI2ING TIR FILING OF NOTICE O! COMPLETION FOR THE NODE _'v` *,. ~ City Council Agenda PAGE ~~~~ September 20, 1959 30 Tract 12941. located o th t eid d ~ae ide f 126 Terrace View Loon at Pvzamid Peak Court Relaaee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5 7fi,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 7,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-436 127 A RESOLUTION OP TH% CITY COVNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CVCAxONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPT INC THE PVELIC IMPROVEMENTS YOR TMCT 12941 AND AUTNORIE ING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THE WORA Tract 12642. located on the aaet ^ide end ~eet •id f 128 Terrace view Loo t xt bot •~• •~~ w~ *.+~....... Court Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5108,000.00 Accepts xsintensnce Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 10,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 59-437 129 A RESOLVTION O! TF1E CITY COUNCIL O- THE CITY OF MNCNO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPT INC THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12642 AND AUTHOAI2IMC THE RLING OP A NOTICS OF COMPLETION FOR THS xORE Tract 12935 1 c ted th act tde and oath td f 130 Terrace Vlew Lmo et xi. Wallace Cou t Releeees Petthtul Performance Bond (Street) $ 77,800,00 Accept: Maintenance Cuaranta Bond (Street) 5 7,780.00 rM1-:j ~' PAGE City Council Agenda Sapiember 20, 1989 11 RESOLVTION NO. 89-638 131 A RESOLVTION OF TFDS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVHLIC IlIPR0VEtBNT3 POR TRACT 12939 AND AVTHOA I2IN0 THE FILING OP A NM ICE OF COMPLETION POR TF~ NORK 26. Approval to Release Caeh Deposits: 132 In the amount of 62,900.00 to Hac3eod DeveloomenG for Hodnl Home Sales Off Sce for Tract 12621. In the artrouni of 62.900.00 to Lewis Xomee for Model Home Sales Office for Tract 11736. ;n the amount of 52,300.00 to The Fieldeiona Comoanv for Model HoM Salsa Office for Tract 13097. 29. Approval of proposal to designate the Demene-TOletoy 133 House, 9686 Hillside Rosd, Rancho Cucamonga, ns a Landmark - APN 3061-963-03. RESOLUTION NO. 89-439 166 A RESOLUTION O! THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP IUNCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OP THE DElBNS-TOLSTOY XOU36, 26. Approval of propoul to duignata Lhe Croswell House, 168 9574 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga ee a Landmark - APN 203-311-04. RESOLUTION NO. 89-440 19~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DES ICNATION OF THE CROSWBLL HOUSE, 9876 ARROW HIGHWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A9 A LANDMARK 27. Approval oL the detachment of Treei 1]036, located salt 198 of East Avanua, south of Highland, tree Landscape ~ ~ ~ Ha!ntenancs District No. 1, approval of the formation of Landscape Msinbnanq District No. H and setting the Public Hearing for NovsmDer 1, 1959. _.J ~, PAGE City Council Agenda Septmnber 20, 1989 12 199 RESOLUTION NO. 89-ddl A AESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS POR THE PORNATION OF LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCH DISTRICT NO. B, PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 200 RESOLUTION NO. 89-442 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPOANIA, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 AESOLDTION NO. 89-443 ZD/ A ABSOLUTION O! THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DETACNMBRT OF TRACT 13063 AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PORN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND OFFERING A TIMB ANO PLACE POR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO L. Cd1EEI1T OEDINAMCEE The folloring OMLnaacas has had public haaringe at the lire of liras vauiay. ewwwi ruuirya ~sr~~~ and nw-eonlrownLl. That' will M aeLW upon Dy the Comcil at one tine rithout diacuasion. The CStP Clark will aad the title. Ray itq can M raao~W for diseusaion. No I[eme Submitted. ', P. ADVEETIEW PUBLIC EEARINOt The [~lloring Star ha•e bNn WPartiaW aad/or poatW a• public heariaga a raguirtl by Lr. The chair will open Lhe rseting to reoaire public ballaonP. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESBMENT AND DEIRLOPMENT DISTRICTS 2O9 i i i i - A i rsquast to pre-:one approaimauly 26 acrd locatW on the northaut corner of Highland and Rochester Avanuu to Low Dane Sty ReaidenCiQ (2-4 dwelling unlb par sera) - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04 and 18. (CootinuW !rw feptasber 6, 1989) .N ;_~~ . ~~~~+~ CLtP Coune ll Agenda Se LemDer Z0, 1989 PAGE 13 OAD INANCE NO. 400 (first reading) 222 AN ORDINANCE OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMBNT DISTRICT AMENDlBNT 89-02, PRB- ZONING APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND TO LON DENSITY R63IDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING VNITS PER ACAS) I.OCATSD AT THS NORTF~AST ODANBR OP HICHLA.YD AND ROCF[BSTER AVENUES AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TNERBOP - APN 225-152 -01, 02, 03, 06, AND 18 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSSSS!ffiNT AND DEVELOPNBNT AGREEMENT 89-03 ZO9 - BLACRNON HOlffiS. INCORPORATED - A requeeL to approve a devslopmant agreavront (CO 89-149) Eor approxisately 25 acres cone feting of 78 reetdantial lots located at tha northeast corner of Highland end Rochester Avenues -APN 225-352-01, 021 03, 04 and 18. (Cwtinued ftw eeplea~er 6, 1989) OADINANCB No. 401 (first readlnq) 224 AN ORD INANCS OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF TNS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL210RNIAr APPROVING DBVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 FOA APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCATED AT TH6 NORTHEAST CORNER OP MIGNLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUH9, AND HARING lINDINGS IN SUPPORT i nEnbVS - KI1 iti-LJL -VLI VL• Vi• VYI MU 10 3. ENVIRONMENT T~ASSESSNENT uN8 ATION A RRW.NT RO-n] _ PO9 BLACRNON NOMSS. INGGRPGMTED - A request to apprava an anneznt TOn egraeeunt (CO 89-150) for dsvelopmenG and annezat ion of approzimetely 25 acres located on tha nartheasi corner of Highland and Rochester AYSnuae - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04 and 18. (COatisued few eeptesdfez 6, 1989) AHSOLUTION NO. 89-375 2~8 A R690LUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP T2BY CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONCAI CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL A99E99MENT AND ANNEXATION ~ ~ ~ AGREEMENT R9-03 (HOMSSTBAD LAND DEVELOPNENT)1 POR DEVELOPMENT AND ANNEXATION OF APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACAE9 O! VACANT LAND LOCATED AT THE NOATMEAeT CORNER O} HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES AND MAKING FINDINGB IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-O11 021 03, 041 AND le -rat:..': y:-.... . PAGE Clty CouncLl Agenda Sepiembar 20, 1989 14 4. SPROGRa~ING 534 049 00 PR0. C %P ND D PRIOR Y 284 COMMVNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GAaa^' FCn+DS TO THE VIA " I T IMPRO~ NT PAO.IELT 285 RESOLUTION NO. H9-444 A R&SOLUT ION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPAOGAAMMING $36,049.00 FROM AVAILABLS PRIOR YEAR COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FUNDING TO VIA CARILLO STREET IMPROVEMENTS 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT fCDBGI GaaNTFE 266 PERFGRMANGE REPORT. 1983-89 FISCAL YEAR - Rwisw of the uee of Block Grant funds, including the status of funded projects and achievement of local and federal goals. 300 RESOLUTION NO. 89-445 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TF6 COMMUNITY DBVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT GAANTSE PERFORMANCE REPORT, 1988-69 FISCAL YEAR 6. CONSIOEMTION TO AMEND MAP TMCT NO. 10210 T+V'aTED ON TNB NORTH SIDE O! ALMOND 9TREET NEST OF SAPPHIeR 9TIlrET 30S - Conaldsration of approval of Amending Map Nithin a seismic spscial sWdiss zone, to adjust lot lino to accomodnts spacial aetbecb rsquirament• pursuant to final geological study, submitted oy Nordic Development Company. O. PUBLIC EEIIRING6 The following itaa bates ao legal publication or posting requisswRL. The chair will open the nssLing to rnaiss publle bstLeul. No Rama Submitted. N. CITY MANAOQ'E BTAA RNPORTR The followieg itra do RoL lagallP require an! public bstiaosF, •lkhou9b the chair gay opaR the nsatioq for public input. 1. STATUS REPORT ON ACTIVITIES IN THE VICINITY O- LaROA GMP 3O2 ...t~ ..icy ti` PAGE CLty Council Agenda September 30, 1989 15 2. APPROVAL TO E%ECUTE AGABEMENT ICO 89-1571 BETWEEN TH8 314 u o w SUBSCRIPTION TO TH6 CZTY'S GEOGRAPHIC INFOAMATLON SYSTEM pATABASE, POR THE INITIAL SUBSCRIPTION AMOUNT OF 510,000.00. 3. STAINS REPORT ON SIDSWALRS POR PI.ACIDA COURT WEST OF 319 S IEARA MADR6 STREET (COntiaued froe Bepteebe[ 6. 1989) 4. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SHWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 32O CUCAMONGA COVNTY GAYER DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 89-466 322 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPRIVING RESOLUTION OP INTENTION AND BOUNDARY MAP FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 17 OF CUCAHONGA COVNTY WATHR DISTRICT S. CONSIOEMTION OP POLICY ON ANNEIUTI0N5 OP FUTURE 338 DEVELOPMENTS INTO THE LAN 6NP0RCEMBNT COMMUNITY ~CIL2TIES DISTRICT 88-3 PROPOSHO BOUNDARY 2. COUNCIL 608INEB8 Tba follaWleq Ltae pave bNn raqueated bl the CLtY CouYCLl !nom Al ~n._~-,-,. ___ _- t yui,Iir L aiL.J iLpa• iLLeYYgY the Chair rF open the uetLe9 for public Soput. 1. STRIDE REPORT ON NORDIC DHVELOPMENT (O[el Report) (COntiuued [roe Eepteebee 6. 1989) 2. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING A CITIZENS ENVIRONMHNTAL 34O MAHAGBMENT COMMISSION - RaCOeerondat iOn to traN it LOn the Cltizane AtlvLOry Camiuion eo an Environmental Commiu LOn. 3. CONS IDEAATION OP AMENDING OAD INANCE NO. 10-A PERTAINING 342 i ~ TO SALARIES POR MEMHER9 O! THE CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 30-8 (first reetling( i 344 AN ORD INANC6 OP THE CITY COUNCIL O! TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOXUA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING SECTIONS 3.16.040 AND 2.16.030 OF TN6 RANCHO CUCAMONOA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SAI,ARIE9 FOR NEMBEAB OF TX6 CITY COUNCIL .r'Jy` PAGE City Council agenda September 20, 1989 16 4. CONSSOSRRTION OF PROPOCaI. ono •rxs..w.m. Op ~ 346 OROINANCf3 RSCMDING DO T SRO ION CONTAO S%PANSZON OP TNS DUST CONTRO- RPa - Thia La a request from the County agricultutal Comoiuioner for input and euppozt of proposed amendments to County Ordinsnces strengthening enforcement procedures and expanding the Dust Control Mea to Lnclude areas within the City Sphere of Influence. J. IDENTIPIGTION OP ITEMS POR NEIT MEETING This is the tiMe for City Come11 to identify the Ltua thq wish to diseuu at the nee aeetiaq. Tbue itua rill sot be diseuusd at thin sweltag, only ideatifisd for the sea eeelia9. IL COMMUNIGTIOME PROM TEE PUELIC Tbis is the tlMe sad place for LM general public to addoaa the City Council. lisle ler prohibits the CStY Couaeil Iron addruaiag .ny iuue not preoionalY included oa the Ageada. Tha City Couo<il uy recei.e tutiaoap sad set Lhe utbr for auheequent Meting. Counts era LO M 1Led.ted to fi•e dnuba per 1ad1Y1dW1. L. AOJOVRIO®IT IRfTINO TO aDJOORN TO A JOIR IOSE'IiNO OP SEE CITY COUNCIL a11D PLaMNIMO COMMIftION TO DIfCUtf TQ VICTORIA OAROfN{ REOIONaL MRLL NITS TR faml CgRRNY OM ffPTOmOI 26, 11f9, a~30 P.M., aT TBa LIONf Po1RR COMMDIITY CENTZR. I, Debra J. Adams, Clty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, actuate copy of tM foregolnq agenda was posted on September 15, 1989, wwnty-two O2) - hours prior to the meeting per Covernmant Coda Sa953 at 9320- i ~ C Baas Line Goad. s' l .V,: . ~.~.`. August 16, 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COVNCIL NINVTEB Reauler Meeting A. CALL TO OADRR A regular meeting of the City Council met on Wednesday, August 16, 1989, at the Linna Peek Community Center, 9161 Baee Line Aoad, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:43 p.m. Dy Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Pamela J. Wright (left the City Council meeting at 1:30 a.m.), and Hayor Oennie L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lamr City Manager, Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Managez; James Markman, City Attorney; Diane O'Nea 1, Adminietrat ive Analyst; Patty Aiffel, Executive Aeeietant; Susan Mickey, Administrative Aide; Aick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Bret Morner, Associate Planner; Steve Rose, Aeeietant Planner; Russell Maguire, City 8ngineer; Paul Aougeau, Traffic Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer; Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer; John Kartin, Associate Civil Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Jim Mart, AdmLnietrative Services Director, and Debre J. Adams, Clty Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Charles J. Buquet II. • w w x r n Jack Lam, City Manager, et ated it ie requested that Items 81, F3, F4, FS end P6 he continued to the September 6, 1989 meeting. He further announced Item G2 will be re-noticed in The Daily Report for legal reasons, and that the item will be back at the September 20, 1989 meeting. . . • . . « B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS ' B1. Presentation of 10-year pin to Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. ITEM CONTINUED TO THE SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 I~BT INO e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C. COMMIMICATIONS PROM TNB PVBLIC David Rogoff, 8229 Placida Court, stated the City had made some improvements on his street, and that he was oziginally told hie street could have eidewalke. tie stated he Se now being Cold that because of the width of th¢ street they cannot get eidewalke. City Council Minutes August 16, 19 E9 Page 2 Mayor Stout asked that this item come back at the Beptember 6, 1989 City Council meeting for further discussion. Tom Albrecht, 6434 Tacketem Place, asked when 19th and Haven was going to be finished and when Highland will be reopened. He also asked about Milliken being extended. Mayor Stout stated that all of hie coneerne would be discussed later in the meeting. Tam Albrecht stated he also had some concerns regarding hie property aseeeemente. He was referred to Jerry Fulwood, Deputy Clty Manager to discuss this with him. R # R # R # D. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Wright asked that Item D3 be removed for discussion. Councilmember Brown asked that Item D7 be removed far tliecueeion. D1. Approval Of Minutes: July 19, 1989. D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 8/2/89 and 8/9/89 and Payroll ending 8/7/89 for [he total amount of $3,698,098.52. D3. Approval to authorize the advert le ing of the ^NOtice Inviting Bide" for the Milliken Avenue Median from 4th to 6th Streets and Eaet Side Entrv Monument Improvement Project, to be funded from eeaut if icat ion Funds, Account Noe. 21- 4647-BB 14 and 21-4647-8719 (FY 89/90. ITEM REMOVED POR DISCUSSION AS REQUBSTRD BY COUNCILMEMBER WRIOAT RESOLUTION NO. 89-360 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALI PORNI A, APPROVING PLANE AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA TNS ^MILLIEEN AVENUE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENT FROM 4TH TO 6TH STREETS AND EAST SIDE ENTRY MONUMENT", IN SA IU CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERE TO MVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the ^NOtice Inviting Bide" for t.`.e E,.iwacda Avenue Cotbleatoaa Cutb and Gutter Improvement Project located on the west aide of Et iwanda Avenue, north of Victoria Street, to be funded from Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-8822 (FY 88/89(. RESOLUTION NO. 89-3fi1 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS ANO SPECIPICAT IONS FOR THE "ETIWANDA AVENUE COBBLESTONE CURB City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 3 A[iD GUTTER" LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OP VICTORIA STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE sins D5. Approval to authorize the advert Laing of the ^NOt ice Inviting Bide" for the Haven Avenue Median, Phase IV-A Improvement Project, located from Haven Village Drive to Highland Avenue to be funded from eeautif icat Lan Fu nd a, Account No. 21-4647-8795 (FY 49/90). RESOLUTION NO. 89-362 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIPICATIONS POR THE "HAVEN AVENVE MEDIANS, PHASE IV- A" ZN SAID CITY AND AVTHORI ZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLHRR TO ADVHRT ISE TO RECHI VH HIDS D6. Approval to assign two crossing guards to Amethyst Avenue in the vicinity of Alta Loma Elementary School, based on the recommendation of the Public Safety Commission. D7. Approval to purchase riding lawn mower and required trailer from C.R. Jaeschke, Incorporated of San Diego, California, for the amount of $25,107.38 to be funded from Account Number 72-4225-1045 (FY 89 J90). ITBN RSNOVED POR DISCUSSION AB REQURST6D BY C0VNCILM6'NBER BROWN nR. Annrreal to axeente Renewai Anreement T.O A9-libl far fhc i.a nderane Maintenance Contract for Haven Median Islands and San Bernardino County Flootl Control Wash Ende to Mariposa Landeeapee, Incorporated o£ Scuth E1 Monte, California, for the amount of $133,510.00 to be funded by General Fund, County Flood Control Agreement, Landscape Maintenance Assessment Dietricte 3B and 4; Account Numbers 01-4647-6028, OB-4647-6028, 46-4130-6028 and 43-4130-5028, respectively (FY 89/90). ^9. Approval to execute Renewal Agreement (CO 89-137) for the Landscape Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Dietricte 2 and 4 to Landscape We et. of Loe Angeles, Californ La, for the amount of $251,916.00, to be funded by Landscape Maintenance Assessment District 2 and 4; Account No,e 41-4130-6028 and 43-4130-6028, respectively (FY 89/90). D10. Approval to execute Renewal Agreement (CO 89-138) for the Landscape ..a lntenarme CO~a Tact fir Genec aL Fwid Pac'kweys and Landscape Maintenance Assessment Dietricte 1, 3A, entl 5 to Landscape Weet of Loe Angeles, California, for the amount of $234,779.00 to De funded by General Fund and Landscape lAa intenance Aaaeeement Dietricte 1, 3A, and 5; Account Noa. 01-4697-6028, 40- 4130-6028, d2-4130-6028 and d4-4130-6028 (FY 89/90). D11. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-139) Eor services with Inland Mediation Board for Senior Shared Housing Services in the amount of $6,300.00 to be reimbursed Dy CDlMlun ity Development Block Grant Funds. City Council Minutes Auquat 16, 1909 Page 4 D12. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-140) Eor services with Inland Hed iation Board fot a Pair Housing Program and Housing Information and Counseling Services in the amount of $8,976.00 to be reimbursed by Co~mounlty Development Block Grant Funds. 013. Approval to execute an amendment to a Pro Eeee Tonal Services Agreement (CO 89-141) with Michael Brandman Associates, Incorporated for additional services for the preparatton of an Environmental Impact Report for [he fitiwanda North Specific plan not to exceed $14,036.00, with said amount to be reimbursed by the Applicant. 014. Approval to award and execute agreement (CO 89-142) for the Beryl and Lions Park Tennis Courts Improvement Project to Hubbe Equipment and Construction, San Bernardino, California, for the amount of $870x019.00 plus 10\ contingency to be funded From Park Development Punde 20-4532-8006 and 8007, 3984 State Bond Act Funds 29-4532-8619 and 8920, and 1985-Bb Roberti-2eberg 20-4632- 8619. D16. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 89-143) between Robert W. Smith and Cheryl L. Smith and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Drainage Improvements located along the northwest corner of the Smith parcel for the Hidden Farm Culvert project. RESOLUTION NO. 89-363 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF PANCNO CUCAHONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR TN.STALT.ATTON GF pORLTr TMPFnVFMFNT aNn nFnTnATTnN RFnM ROBERT W. SMITH AND CHERYL L. SMITH, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERR TO SIGN SANE D16. Approval to execute Agreement for Inetallat ion of Public Improvement and Dedication (CO 89-144) between Walter Q. White and Gayle H. White and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Drainage Improvements located along the southeast portion of the White parcel for the Hidden Fatm Cu Lvert Project. RESOLUTION NO. 89-364 A RESOLUTION OP THR CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT POR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ANO DEDICATION FROM WALTER Q. WHITE ANO GAYLE H. WHITE, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AWD CiiY CLERE TO SIGN SAME 017. Approval io execute Agreement for Inetallat ion of Public Improvement and Dedication (c0 89-145) between Henzy Martinez and Joan E. Martinez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Eor Drainage Improvements located along the northeast portion of Che Mart Inez parcel Eor the Hidden Farm Culvert project. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Pass $ RESOLUTION NO. 09-366 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGRESMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION PROM HENRY MARTINEZ AND JOAN E. HARTINEZ, AND AUTHOAIZ ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SANE D18. Approval of a Lease Agreement (CO 59-146) with Metropol lion Water District for use of six acres of Diatrict property for Beryl Park for 51,200.00 per year. D19. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 89-147) for the Nills itle Avenue Storm Drain end Street Improvements from AYChibald Avenue to the Upper Alta Loma Channel, by Associated Engineers, Incorporated, for the additional study and design of local drainage facilit ie a, ae required by Ean Bernardino County Flood Control, in the amount of $3,500.00 to bring the new contract total amount to $14,700.00 to De funded by City-wide Storm Drain Fees Account No. 23-4637-8862 (FY 88/89). D20. Approval of Parcel Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Real Property Imp[ovement Cont [act and Lien Agreement (CO 89-148(, and Ordering the Annexation to Landseape Maintenance Diatrict No. 1 end Stteet Lighting Maintenance Dietrlct Noe. 1 and 2 far Parcel Map $996, located south of Wilson Avenue, east of Mayberry Avenue, submitted by Randolph s. Davie and Sandra P. Davie. ABSOLUTION NO. 89-366 A PESOLUT ION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER $996, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. $996), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY ANO REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 89-367 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CEPTAIN TERRITORY 1b LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NU. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP $956 0""<i. Approvai to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP 84-34 located on the northeast corner of Baee Line Road and carnelian Avenue submitted by MBWJ Properties. AESOLUTZ ON NO. 89-3fi8 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALI PORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA CUP 84-34 City Council Minuiee August lfi, 1989 Page 6 D22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13442 Kenyon Park, located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive, eubmittad by William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 89-369 A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%THNSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13442 EENYON PAA% D23. Approval of reduction of Falt hful Performance Bond for Tract 12671-1 through -4 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue end Mountain Vlew ^r ive, eubmittad by Lewle Homes of California. Accept: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 103,400.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $1,034,000.00 D24. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: Tract 10414 located on Riverside Avenue between Mille ids Aoad and Vista Street v.,i ewe.,. Faithful Performance Bond (street( $ 322,250.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Certificate of Deposit (Et rest) $ 32,250.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-370 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 10414 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE DR 07-16 located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Foothill Hou ievard and Arrow Route Faithful Performance Bond (street( $ 10,000.00 AHSGLDTI ON NO, 89-371 A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPAOVEMBNTS FOR DR 87-16 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORX City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 7 DR EE-16 located on the west aide of Santa Anita Avenue. 2.000 feet north of 4th Street Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 14,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-372 A RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR RE-18 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DR R7 09 locate on ou ' e o A row Route 2500 feet went of Roche at er Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 408,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. E9-373 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR DR E7-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WORE D25. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond Eor: of 115'19 ln.. of e.i n fFn lAn of we...~nea a..enne n4F ni Oaae is Road Maintenance Guarantee Bcnd (Street) $ 4,900.00 Tract 12670-1 through -4 located on the south aide of ease Line Aoad. between Soruce Avenue antl Milliken Avenue Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ R2,995. 00 Tract 13052 located on the north aide of 19th Street between Amethvet Avenue and Archibald Avenue Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 26,100.00 MOTION: Moved by wrivht. evconried by Rmwn ro ann rove ehf• Conecnt Calendar wirh the exception of items D3 and D7. Motlon carried unanimously 4-0-1 (9uquet absent). OISCVSSION OP ITEM D3. Approval to authorize the advertia ing of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the Milliken Avenue Median from dth to fith Streets and Eaet Side Entcy Monument Improvement Project, to be footled from Beau! if lest loo Funds, Account Noe. 21-4647-8814 and 23-4647-8719 (FY 89/90). City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 8 Councilmember Wright asked if any funds, other than Beautification Funds, would be used. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, et ated no. RESOLVTION NO. 89-360 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIPICATIONS FOR THE "MILL IREN AVENUE MEDIAN IMPROVEMENT PROM 4TH TO 6TH STREETS AND EAST SIDE ENTRY MONUMENT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLEAE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution No. 89-360. Motion carried unanimously d-0-1 (BUquet absent). •11 R1R DISCVSS ION OP ITEM D7. Approval to pu[chaee riding lawn mower and required trailer Erom C.R. .Taeechke, Incorporated of San Diego, Cal iforniar for the amount of $25,107.38 to be funded from Account Number 72-4225-7045 (FY 89/90). Cou nc ilmember Brown queatloned if the city should purchase a machine that ie going to be outlawed because of it having a gasoline engine. Paul Rougeau, TraEfis F.nginear, stated he would hope chat the Air Quali[y ..,a e...,, .,~.......".. .,d.. ~.,.... fti:.. Mayor Stout asked if this could be held for two weeks to allow time for an investigation into this. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, et ated this engine could be converted to an alternate Eue1 source if needed. Cou nc ilmember Brown asked if there were lawn mowers available that do not use gasoline, and has the CLty checked on this. Ru well Maguire, City Engineer, stated they have checked into it, and that eventually they would have the capability to convert the City's machines ae they come on line. Mn9.1 nNf Mnvon ny Hrnwn~ eacnn~ad ny AlevgnnaY to apnrnvc the p'~rcha ga pf Yha riding lawn mower and required trailer. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Bu gust absent). • x n x " " E. CONSENT ORDINANCES E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 89-01 - CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA - Eetablie hment of criteria Eor car washes within Neighborhood Commercial Districts. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 9 E2. AMENDMENT TO THE CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION ORDINANCE - An amendment to Chapter 17.22 of the Municipal Code, modifying parking requirements for condominium conversions to be consistent with Development Code parking regui remente. Debra J. Aflame, City Clerk, read the titles of ordinance Noe. 398 and 399. Mayor Stout asked if the City has received any additional information regarding ordinance No. 398. Brad Buller, City Planner, statetl no ORDINANCE NO. 39E (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CVCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CAR WASHES WITHIN NEIGHBORHOOD CONHERCIAL DISTRICTS ORD INANC6 NO. 399 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.22 OF THE MUNICIPAL 0006, MODIFYING PARKING REQUIREMENTS POR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIREMENTS ..____... .._.__ _~ ___...., ____..___ _~ ..__~.... .._ ..__._ ____ _.._.._..y _... -,.~-- .. Ordinance Noe. 39E end 399. Hotlon carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Baguet absent). ~ a x w • w F. ADVBRTI SED PVBLIC HEARINGS F1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the circulation element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan to restore [Trough Lraf Fic to Highland Avenue between Hflven Avenue and Deer Creek Channel, with a connection to Highland Avenue from 19th Street near San Benito Avenue. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer. Mayor Stout asked iE this has been processed through CaLtrana. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, stated they have obtained permits from Caltrane. Jack Lam, City Manager, et ated there is new leadership at Caltrane and the City has been meeting with them. He further stated that Caltrane hes Deen doing some revamping o£ their personnel and felt there should be more cooperation from them. Mayor Stout asked when the Mil liken work woultl be tlone. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 30 Paul Aougeau, Traffic Engineer, stated work ie to begin next week and that permits have been obtained from Coltrane. He stated the completion o£ the work should be in about six to eight weeks which would open the lane down to Aaee Line Road. Hayor Stout asked when it would be completed down to Foothill Boulevard. Paul Aougeau, Traffic engineer, stated he dose not have a good time frame for that, but felt St should be in lees than six months. Mayor Stout asked about the completion of thr_ intersection of 19th and Haven. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, stated that the completion of the job should be done by the end of September including the traffic signs 1. Councilmember Brown asked what tae tlue date was for the Highland extene ion. Russell Haquire, City Engineer, stated work shoo ld begin in September at tae time the contract le executed. Mayor Stcut asked what the coat to the City would be for this work. Russell Maguire; Clty Engineer, elated $250,000 to $300,000, and that the work should be completed in about three months. He further added the second phase will follow which will include six lanes. Councilmember Alexander asked about tae total coat to renovate Highland end •..i...l •1... . ~t..n ..i •F ~~ Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer, stated yes. Councilmember Brown asked if this street would have to be torn apart again in tha future. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, it would when [he freeway went in. Phillip To lore, 10961 Santa Clare Court, expressed hie concerns for the closing, and now the reopening, of Highland. Mayor Stout stated that when the freeway is built, Highland will be covered up and at that time tae $250,000 to $300,000 will be wasted. Phi L~ m_n i,..re, 10yn1 cants C1a ra Cnn rt, a=k=n whir pmcenn re was taken rn approve the closure to begin with. Mayor Stout stated Coltrane closed this street, not the City. Philip Tolore, 10961 Santa Clara Court, stated he felt it was not right for the Ctty to have to pay for the revamping of Highland since Coltrane was the one to close it. City Council Mlnutee August 16, 1989 Page 11 Mayor Stout stated since it was the City wanting to reopen it that they would have to pay for the work to be done. He added that Caltrane hat refused to pay for some of the City's improvements. Philip Tolore, 10961 Santa Clara Court, stated he hoped that something would be done io prevent this from happening in the future. Christina Menarri, 11430 Mt. Palomar Street, complained about the mail del iveriee in her area etat ing the Po at Office hat refused to deliver mail to her hone. She also complained about the one exit to get out of her street, end asked for Banyan to De cut through first. She asked why the right turn lane at Haven and 19th was closed. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Sngineer, stated he would check into this. Al Buahtoeh, 6785 Valinda, did not feel 19th was capable of handling the amount of care on that street, and expressed hie concern about all of these problems. Mayor Stout asked for Rueeell Maguire, City Engineer, to help on the signal ineta llation at Victoria and Naven. Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, et ated that it should be soon. Al Buehtoeh, 6785 Valinda, expressed hie conc erne about the speeding vehic lee on this street. There being no Eu rther resnnnse. Mavnr At nut rl ncod rho nnM /r nea rinn RESOLUTION N0. 89-374 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 89-03 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT BY THE ADDITION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE ANO DEER CREEK CHANNEL, WITH A CONNECTION TO 19TH STREET NEAR SAN BENITO AVENUE MOTION; Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to approve Reeol~tion No. 89- 374. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (euquet absent). F2. MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-3 - NELSON - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to modify a condition of approval zequ icing the payment of an in-lieu fee for landscaping within the I-15 Freeway right-of-way along the project frontage of 1.55 scree in the General Industrial Specific PLan, located on the west aide of Hyssop Drive, north of 4th Street - APN 229- 331-02 (Item continued free the Suly 19, 19 R9 meeting) Staff report preaenied by Bret Horner, Associate Planner. City Council Minutes P.uguet 16, 1909 Page 12 Councilmember Wright asked for the amount of fees involved in the blue section of the map that was shown on the overhead projector. Bret Horner, Associate Planner, et ated he felt about $10,000 to $10,000 would be involved, and that the remainder of these would be paid after the south portion of the project was 8eveloped. Councilmember Brown felt the fee should be shared by all those people along this corridor. The City Council quest toned if the public hearing had been closed on this item at the July 19, 1989 meeting. Janes Markman, City Attorney, etaied that according to the minutes, which the City Council had just approved, the hearing was continued. Councilmember Wright stated she felt the developer should be able to participate in the discussion to decide if there was a better way of funding this lantlacaping. Mayor Stout stated that, unless there was some kind of a condition eat ablie had tonight, the developer would not have to join an aeeeaement district prior to the ieeuance of the bu Llding permit, and that hie approval would be completed tonight. James Markman, City Attorney, referred to the memorandum that was written by warren Divan which et aced their opinion regarding possible methods to finance 4AP .naf AllAf inn AnA mA,nf PnAnrP of landcraninn ITnrnVPTPntP Plnnn the Interstate 15 corridor. He further etaied that it would be difficult to put together this kind of a diet rict in that particular area. Ne added that if [here was an aeeeaament tliatrict for maintenance, then Mr. Nelson might be in it and might not care for i[, but added if there ie an aeeeaement district to do the landscaping, and he'e made a per square foot contribution, he is going to get credit Eor it, he Would not be double aeeeased. Councilmember Wright asked if there should be an Executive Session since this dealt with advice from the City Attorney. James Markman, City Attorney, et ated only if the City Council felt there might be litigation involved. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council way: John Nelson who asked foi a clarification on the staff report as it related to providing a security for the deferred cash payment. James Markman, Clty Attorney, stated the city council had changed the condition to state Lf he goee to develop the property then he has to pay Che Eee. Ne stated the way the condition should be written ie that, if it ie a pre-condition of the leeu ante of a building permit for any development of the southerly city council Ninutee August 16, 1989 Page 13 portion, that ie eecurity. He further stated that Hr. Nelson cannot do anything with the property until he has paid the fee, and he did not feel that the City Council was looking for any eddi[tonal eecurity. He commended the staff for being thorough, Dut added that we do not need eecurity other than payment of the fee prior to building permit for the southern sect ion. Mr. Nel eon et ated he agreed with what Mr. Markman had said, and suggested that the additional eecurity be deleted ae one of the conditions. James Harkman, City Attorney, felt it should be stated that any approval for construction, other than dealing with the retention basin, requires the payment of the fee. There being no furrher response, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. James Harkman, City Attorney, stated that Resolution No. 89-340 needed to be acted upon, but it needed to include the amendments that were discussed tonight and at the July 19, 1989 meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 89-340 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPOANIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COHMZSSION'S DECISION TO HODIPY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRING PAYMENT OF AN IN-LIEU FEE FOR LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE I-15 PREEWAY (DEVORE) FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, POR THfi DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON 1.55 nrvwe nv raven rw mwv cvvvvar rvnnv mvrar nw mvrrm (SUBAREA 14), LOCATED ON HYSSOP ORIVH AND NORTH OF dTH STREET, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexandecr seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 89-340 with amendments ae listed helow: "The freeway right-of-way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped in accordance with a master plan for the entire segment of freeway within the City as approved 6y Caltrane, the City Planner, and City Engineer. Howeverr if Caltrane will not allow the incremental construction of this Ereeway landscaping with this project, a cash payment in-lieu of ccnetruct ion as a contribution to a future comprehene ive project shall be made to the City prior to the iesu once of building permits. The developer's reaponaibility ahaii bw iimir.eri en the area ea ar of rho oa ar rnna nt the no rthbnn nd freeway on-ramp. A portion of the cash payment, proportional to the amount of area within the site occupied by the retention basin compared to the total site arear may be deferred until the filling and development of the retention bee in area (including, but not limited to construction of any structures, parking facilit Le e, or storage area).' Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (BUquet absent). . . r City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 14 A recess was taken at 8:55 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m. with all members of City Council pre eent (august absent). F3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS A.MENDHENT 89-02 - BLACiCMON AOlDiS. INCORPORATED - A requeei to pre-zone approximately 25 acres located on the northeast corner Of xighland and Rochester Avenues to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling unite per acre) - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03r 04 and 18. ITEM CONTINUED TO THB BEPTBID76R 6, 1989 MEBTINO F4. ENVIRONMENTAL AS SSS N V LOP ENT AGREEMENT 89-03 - BLACRNON HOMBS INCORPORATED - A request to approve a development agreement (CO 89-149) for approximately 25 acres consisting of 78 ree idential lots located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04 and 16. ITEM CONTINUED TO THE BEPTHI®EA 6, 1989 I~ETINO F5. ENVIRONMENTAL AS SESSHBNT AND ANN&XAT ION AGREEMENT 89-03 -BLACXMON HONES INCORPORATED - A request [o approve an annexation agreement (CO 89-150? for developmenC and annexation of approximately 25 ac ree located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04 and 18. ITEM CONTINUED TO THE BEPTODiER 6, 1989 NEETINO ORDINANCE NO. 400 (tiret reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALTPORN IA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT VACANTp LAND TO LOW vDENSITY RESIOENTI AL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHEBTER AVENUES AND MAXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, AND 18 ORDINANCE NO. 401 (first reatl ing) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 FOA APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACRES OP VACANT LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OP HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES, AND HARING PINOINGS ZN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-U 1, 02, 03, 04, AND 18 HHSnId:T ION No. 8v-i7ti A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 09-03 (HOMESTEAD LANG DEVELOPMENT(, FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ANNEXATION OF APPAO%IMATELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUEB ANO HARING PIKD INGS IN SUPPORT THEREOP -APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04r ANO 18 City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 15 MOTION: Moved by Blown, seconded by Alexander to continue these items to the September 6, 1989 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Baguet absent). F6. APPEAL NV O NT A88E88HENT AND CONDITIONAL VEE PERHIT 89-19 - UNIVERSAL ARCADE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request to set ablieh an arcade in a leased apace of 850 equ are feet within an existing commercial center on 1.26 acres of land in the General Commercial District, located at the southwest cornet of Arrow Route and Malven Avenue - APN 209-04- 151. ITEM REQV68TED TO BE CONTINVED TO THS 6EPTEMBEA 6, 1989 MEETING Mayor Stout stated that the persona appealing this item have asked £or it to 6e continued, but that the patty wanting to establish the arcade ie asking that the hearing be Deld tonight due to econortSC hartlehip. Councilmember Wright asked if there were any legal problems with doing this. James Markman, City Attorney, et ated no. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded Dy Wright to continue the item to Septembet 6, 1989. Motion failed 2-2-1: AYEB: Brown, Wright NOE9: Alexander, 8t out James Markman, City Attorney, stated since this was a tie vote that it will be up for public hearing at tonight's meeting. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner, who stated all parties concernetl were present. Mayoc Stout asked where the City has other arcades Located within the City_ of Rancho Cucamonga. Brad eu liar, City Planner, stated at the southwest corner of Archibald and ease Line, near Baskin-Aobbine. Mayor Stout opened the meeting Eor public hearing. Addressing City Council ware: Jan Greber-Abbot, 9786 Eaet Arrow, stated she was against [he arcade, and that the arcade which Le located at Archibald and Base Line is in a commercial area. Her concern was that this arcade was going to be across the street from her home, and she felt her sees was et cictly residential. Jeff Abbot, 9786 Eaet Arrow, stated he disagreed with the arcade going In hie neighborhood even though the Clty had discussed this with the School D iatr Lc t. He did not feel the arcade ehou ld go Ln a neighborhood area. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 16 Terrence Batlete, applicant for the arcade, stated he hoe tried to work with the Abbot•e on their concerns and wanted to get along with the surrounding community, but he felt some of the Abbot's concerns were false fears. He stated the zoning ie C1 whrch does allow for arcades. He stated that he and his partner, Mike Earl, are supposed to go before the Planning Commission in three months and that the Abbot's are welcome to be part of the meeting. He further stated all they wanted was the opportunity to prove themselves. Hike Earlr applicant for the arcade and partner of Mr. Batlete, pointed out that a Conditional use Permit is revokable if it was not complied with. He stated they would like the opportunity to proceed with the arcade and give it a try. Mayor Stout asked if they have had any expez ienca in this type of business before. Mr. Earl stated he hoe been In various retail bueineaa¢s and hoe had experience in working with the youth. Mz. Hatiete added that they are concerned for the youth, and that they did not want to do anything that would damage the image of Rancho Cucamonga. councilmember Wright asked what the age ie of the clientele that would be going to the arcade. Hr. Bat late stated 11 to 14 years of age. councilmember Wright asked if it was the intent for the children to come to the arcade after school let out. Mr. Bflt late stated not necessarily. Mr. Earl stated they are not aiming their business strictly to children. councilmember Wright asked Mr. Earl whet he felt the age of the clientele would be. Mr. Earl stated he felt the age of people coming to the arcade would be between 11 and 30 years of age, and that about half of the clientele would be under the age of 15. sariene satiate added t},at there are a lot of adu its who eniov arcades a leo. She stated if any proDleme were to occur at the arcade that they would be dealt with. She added that they are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and that they too, have a concern for what happens in the community. councilmember Wr Lght quest Loned the hours that their doors would open ae it related to the schools letting outs and asked if it would hurt their business if they were not able to open their doors until after 5:00 p.m. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 17 Mr. Batiste stated it would be more of an adult crowd that would be their after 5:00 p. m. Mr. Abbot stated he still felt loitering would occur, and that this would be a hang out for drug users, and he did not fell he had any false fears. Mre. Abbot stated she did not Daee her life on fear, ens felt it would be more difficult £or the arcade to move out of that location after they had been established far a few months. She stated she felt they belonged in a commercial area. Mr. Abbot asked if there was suppose to be armed security. Councilmember Brown stated that at the Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission did not feel one t@nant should have to pay for armed security Eor the whole center bec ease of the nature of their bueinee s. There being no further reepone¢, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilmember Alexander asked aDOU[ the revocability of the Conditional Vee Permit. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there would have to be a noticed hearing Defore the Planning Commi96 Lon wish evidence why it should be revoked, and that thin could pone ib ly ba appealed before thn City Council. Mayor Stout asked Lf a Stop order could be issued. James Markman, City Attorney, etatetl it would be hard to do it for this project. Counc ilmember Alexander asked Lieutenant 2einer if there has Seen any problems with arcades ae they relate to the Sheriff's Vepartment. Lieutenant Zeiner stated not that he was aware oE. Councilmember Alexander asked if something could be advertised in such a way to emphaei ze high morale and anti-drug use, and add this to the Conditional Use Permit. James Markman, City Attorney, et eted it would be very difficult to work this up. Councilmembez Brown read comments from the Sheriff and Fire Oepartmente ae aLaLad un PaVe <02 of the ayeuda. She pulnLed uuL CdpLdLl GL1nWY@'e Comm@nt@ about hie concerns for the lute hours and the poseib le fighting of the patrons of the arcade. She etatetl there have bean other projects with the eeme types of concerns from residents. She said the question ie where are the kids going [c hang out, and stated she dose have concerns, and that the same kinds of coed it ions should apply to this area as has been done with some of these other p rojecte. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 38 Councilmember Wright elated her concern ie for the close proximity of the arcade to tae two schools, and she fell there would be kids splitting from the schools and going to the arcade. She added she felt if there was a restriction of hours for after 5:00 p. m. that this would help. She felt the City was caking for [rouble by approving this. Hayor Stout stated he was on the Planning Canmise ion at the time arcades became popular, and stated there were the same concerns at that time. He stated the Planning Commission developed conditions at that eime, and that there has not been any problems with any of the previous arcades. He stated any of the concerns that those people had did not materialize. He further et ated he can see where this is headed for a 2-2 vote. James Markman, City Attorney, et ated they could go through a series of motions or could defer it until September when round lmember euquet comes back. Councilmember Brown felt that Hr. Euquet might have some good input into this since he is a Reserve Baer iff. Councilmember Wright asked what happens if Chere ie a tie vote. Mayor Stout suggested that this be continued to the September 6, 1989 City council meeting. NOTION: Roved by Alexnnder, seconded Wright to continue this item to the September 6, 1989 meeting, and for et aff to contact Counci lmember euquet to listen to the tape eo he can be better informed in order to vote on thle Ltem. unf inn na~~, ad nnem mnn alv 6-n-1 IRnm o[ al.aunf\ F7. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION POA THE PROPOSED CHURCH STREET WIDENING PROJECT FROM AACHI EALD AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE Staff report prevented by Hike Olivier, Sen iot Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was cloned. RESOLUTION NO. 89-376 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIJiONGA, CALI FOANIA. APFAO'VING ZHE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED CHURCH STREET WIDENING PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to approve Reeo lut ion No. R9-376. Motion carried unanimously 6-0-1 (BUquet absent). • R h City Council Mi notes August 16, 1984 Page 19 F8. CONSIDEPATION OF THE DETACHMENT OF TRACT 12659-1 IACATEO ON THE SOUTHNE ST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET AND TRACT 12470 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENVE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES FROM LANA^CAPE !i BTR l`T 1 Nn RDFRTNC THE ANNEXATION OF T4ACT NOS 12659-1 AND 12870 TO LANDSCAP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 Staff report presented by Joe Stof a, Associate Civil Engineer. Councilmember Brown asked if there would be an increase in taxes by doing this. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated there would be an increase. Councilmember Brown asked if this would automatically put this in the new police Mello-Roos District. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated not at this time. Councilmember Wright asked if the issue ie approved, how would all of this happen. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated it would be a separate decision. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public Dearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout stated he felt eT.eff'a decision is fair, and that the peoples who buy there would be the ones to make that decision. Councilmember Hrown stated she would like some sari of confirmation »hnnr properue9 being sold eo that the people buying would not all of a sudden learn that their taxes are being increased. RESOLUTION NO. R9-377 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C[ICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DETACHMENT OF TAACT NOS. 12659-1 AND 12870 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND OROE RING THE WORX ZN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNEXATION OF SAID TRACTS TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 ANC ACCEPTING THE FTNAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12659-1 AND 12870 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to approve Re9ol~tion No. 89- 377. Motion carried unan imouely d-O-1 !9u qv et absent). w ~ n F9. dPPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND LSS DANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE_REPORT - Recommend that the Clty Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting end approving the Em•ironme nt al Initial Study Eor the Et Lwanda/son Sevaine Aree Master Plan of Drainage Aeport and the issuance of a Negat lva Decleret loo therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determinet ion pursuant to the Californle Environmental Quality Act. City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 20 F10. TXE ADDITION OF A NPW CHAPTER TO TITLE 13 OP THB HUNICIP COD& ESTABLISHING A DRAI NAGS FEE FOR NEW DFUELOPHENT IN THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE AREAS - Recommend that the City Council introduce the ordinance relative to the eatabliahment of an 6tiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Plan. Staff report presented by Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Mike RoDbine, 7576 Etiwanda Avenue (church facility), stated this would nave a great impact on him. He stated if they were to expand their facil it iee antl get building permits they would have a Dig increase in taxes to pay, end stated they do not have anyone they could pace these fees to, that they would have to pay them themselves. He felt this matter would have a great Impact on the expansion of their temple. Mayor Stout asked if there are exemptions avallabl e. Walt Stickney, Aeeoctate civil Engineer, stated there are residential exemptions available. Russell Haguire, City Engineer, added that since they have already paid for their five acres they would not have to pay this again. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of ordinance No. 402. RESOLUTION NO. E9-378 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION POA THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE REPORT ORDINANCE NO. 402 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FOANIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 13.09 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING A OAAINAGE PEE FOR ALL NEW DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE LOCAL DM INAGE AREA MOTION: Moved by Alexander, ee^_c.^.ded by erwr. '- wa iva Cuil reeding of ordinance No. 402 and set second reading for September 6, 1989. Motion carried unan imouely 4-0-1 (BUquet absent). MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. E9-378, Motion carried unan imouely 4-U-1 (BUquet absent). • e • • • . City Council Hinutee August 16, 1989 Page 21 a. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ESTAHLISN:NG UPDATED DRAINAGE FEES IN THS STIWANDA AND EAN SEVAI NE AREAS Staff repo[! prevented by Walt St is kney, Associate Civil Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 89-379 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALTPORNIA, ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT FEBS FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE ETIWANDA/SAN HEVAINE LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Hovel by Alexantler, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 89-379. Motion carried unanimously 4-D-1 (Bugset absent). • • e Item I1 was discussed at this point of the meeting. Please refer to regular order of agenda for discussion. + x A recess waa taken at 1:30 a.m. The meet ing waa reconvened at 1:33 a.m. with all members of City Council present (BUquet and Wright absent). C2. IN OMAIN AC ON TO AC UI RE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FO BAS LING ROAD WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN VICTORIA PARR LANE AND INTERSTATE 15 - Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public right-of- way for the Baee Line Road Widening Project between Victoria Park Lane and Interstate 15 at the properties located at 13096, 12658, 12659, 12951 and 13053 ease Line Road and 7322'Et iwanda Avsnue (APN'e 227-131-08, 227-111-33, 227-171- 19, 1100-011-01 and 06 respectively and 227-171-04) for the construction of street improvements across the frontage of Bald properties. (Caslinuad from August 2, 1989 meeting) ITEM CONTINUED TO T8E SEPTEMBER 20, 1989 MBBTINO RESOLOTION N0. 89-341 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NOR, CALIFOIUJIA, DECLAR:NC THE PUSLTC REED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMfl A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATEC IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF FOR APN'S 227-131-OH, 227- 111-33; 227-171-19, 1100-011-01 AND 06 AND 227-161-04 ~ . • • • . City Council Minutes August 16r 1989 Page 22 S. CITY M1INAOBR•S STAPP REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF ISSUING A LETTER OF INTENT FOA THE CITY TO PARTICIPATE N W T 800 S V N SYSTEM AND TO PARTICIPATE IN A JPA POA OPERATION OF THAT SYSTEM Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Senior Administrative Assistant. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to approve at aff's regve et. Motion carried unanimously 3-0-2 (BUquet and Wright absent(. H2. PIAE HYDRANT MAINTENANCB PROGRAM - Statue report on the fire hydrant maintenance program developed jointly by the Cucamonga County Water District and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Statf report presented by Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga File P[otect ion District. ACTION: Report received and filed. • " H3. NS oN O SO U IO S I G HE COU S B I A TIME EXTENSION FOR THE ROC% CRVSHER PROJECT - Oral Report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilmember Brown asked that the Resolution De changed in the fifth paragraph, third line, after the word "which" that the words ^by the admission of the Board of Sutw rvisnrs" be added. RESOLUTION NO. 89-380 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUI7CSL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DENY A AEQUE ST FOR A TIRE EXTENSION OF THE SITE PLAN AND MINING RECLAMATION PLAN FOR THE PROJECT %NOWN COMMONLY AS FOURTH STREET ROCK CRUSHER TO BE LOCATED ON SAN BERNARD INO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL PROPERTY GENERALLY NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE (ROUTE 30) BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUH ANO THE DAY CREEK CHANNEL MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 89-3E0 ae amended. Motion carried unanimously 3-0-2 (BUquet and Wright absent). Z. CoVNCIL 6VSINES6 I1. NORDIC WOODS UPDATE Staff iepo[t presented by Jerry Grant, Build Lnq Official. Please refer to the transcript of this item which ie attachetl and referred to ae Exhibit "A". City Council Minutes August 16, 1989 Page 23 I2. CONS IU M I N OF AR PA ON IN COMMUTER RAIL T ON S CH (Oral Diaeussiaa) 5teff report presented by Councilmember Brown. councilmemDer Brown stated if Council approves this she would be taking this back to the Commuter Rail meeting in September. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Stout to approve the City's parLicipaL ion in the Computer Rail Locution Search which may include the location of Bth and Archibald. Motlon carried unanimously 3-D-2 (BUquet and Wright absent). J. IDENTIFICATION OP ITEMS FOR NBZT ID:LTINO No identification of Lteme. 1 h R• R R R. CONMUNICATIONB FRON TB6 PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. R R . R ! . L. ADJOUANIBNT MOTION: Moved Dy Brown, seconded by Alexander to adjourn to Executive Seeeion to discuss oendina llt LOation record ins the Ai va rd Tawwuit. Mntian narN wd unanimcusly 3-0-2 (BUquet and Wright absent). Meeting adjourned at 1:38 a. m. Respectfully submitted, Deb[a 3. Adams City Clerk Approved: OOOOP ti0u~O9mNOpPOpSpN~+09P0i~•v u~Om-•00 OnnOP 00000 Y9n 0'n WNOOJPO~nOY+u~rv rvOnyrvOmOOpOPpO.~ L I ONPOO O+YO mO hen O.'OmnOnNO+'~O+O-rnNON+NO-rP+ u~On m9~+0 NmYNYnNOrvhr O.. ¢I I ..Om yNN .n+YP PYN~+ mti.+ .+.p ~OmNnOr~ ¢ Z i '/ N -.n nY Op n n m m-r n-r~v < w •I InP O-~Nm+u~.pn9p0•+N DPUrNn+N Uf r s. vir+Ya°aaouao aa,oauoioosoou~oaaa~a.~oii~m° amr~O.mam~Ommmmmaa.oa 9m '°m n°m°m~mmm ii m m m mm mnmmmmmmmmmmmmnn m i c.~L .o s~ iz _ Iw-iY L u .~ w L7w¢< rn n.l Or I.nn nr+•-~.~ ¢I ~ :.x-¢r.:z~ ~~ ¢~ w .z.,~ro .x-x xs u°p9 z' o¢ pvFVV<r-m of pv u°~ i]N v o.>» :]W V yi WOrv~ UV ~O VJ JW VU ¢SwNV VV ,O U~nLrvU < <Omw m 1¢ w2N ~ 6n yUmN []O m ¢U 3w •O-~V VYrv 0t_V ¢Sr ZL<Z rLL nn« O~<Vn~< O:yV ¢OUm ./J`={~~YV~ UU¢VU~-LL¢ <V mw OP w '. pzapp"ow ¢n pn z.w[mYmno.~. ~~~._ .... „.np~ ~a ....+.i~uwio pin ~~= iu ,. .- ~. u•c .-WZwu> o~ ¢,]p z.- caa~ioan~-:a~~~¢~,x¢si¢¢Niu ~. <z~m~udi°.~.n iii` n rymLOrz < .zrc ~ Jwrv•uL -~ 4 U n¢rlu ~w x<rv< ~ L° ~ ¢< wV~ P N <t'Jw ]p a +O9u~ P nn0+ i .. ~ ¢ i o'o .. ~,. „~ J _ <~i ~ ¢rszr >.Z mUS~n22 C2YwZV~LL~ ~ V°O C W~I~)m,Vw Ow¢ ZJn O~]¢~nwVn9Y N6JVVV] d ~•.'"~~q+ a rv<<mi •zY °.LUC ¢ u. r.«« ~-u wz¢o pz'i'w ~~m iv <¢9 u•zJO i.z. `J u zzcz W°aui~ ..u °~Wwuw n iz°°~°°v VLtV'S<¢vON.iY-~~x'~L'O¢<tl~wl- 0;<r)NaS« <VinJVVwLLT V<fOMiuinrtlU N„~ta<Sw~-IVV?JU < a«a{Y<SNmL m Vu~VVZVVV POaYpm~+n r-mYPmNmnn .~InNLVYnNNU~•n ~Ln„Pmrynh909 nr00m .pnpN9y9 000~~ ~+ N -0 POn 000 OOOOO r~O U~0a0000 nOP PU~!'~O LOOT OPwO pOY.Or'n0000NP OnOOan rvOY-.PmrvO rv rO.n mm010 POnOnPOOiH pOOn p90ryu Y09rv 4 Q .~ -~ N N w m in n N T~ rNNOnn u~.-~m~On ~" as a.YO ,-a a rvm.r ~..an oPO-rym.r ~- dmdu oa aaa au ~~u alma aroa ror-r~-a w".~oao .,mm.°~.a„°mmm mmmm mm mmmmmmmmmmmm mmr°.m~°,~O~mmm n~;•°, may V - xWnv ix x w N ~ H ¢ rJ m ~. J.< OJ yOCY09 W aaJ~ 2 v ~JW GJWC m< Ji.1 ..~ .. ,~, u'n _,x, ~+ ~ O n ¢ Q r nnn XZT r .'...v of ^'F Fi..m 4LLa¢ w~~ao< i~<z u~p~ u¢~~^F imH "'K 1Y<wi 6V'dwV V.ny~ny'~~(d ~~6JVVJ z4Up v V .L¢/~ ¢O n6.]O~yi. E__[x< ~ 220in3aJj ~ Sj jt.G .LILY L.-. a.~ y v~ ~ 4 =wLL RuJ=¢ 'KJ ~n~_nO~i Z+~~SV~r¢•~n K.C yl¢r.JUwr a[a021~t14Kn0¢ ~ ~- V r- w J y ~T O n i cLJ _ " ~- U O " J F Z < ~ ~ ,J f S/< a nY .-. J .-w< nn YO J i Y.y < n~~] F C< 4 w <Y62rrv~L ~<Zw [OZ<iV YV V •~ Y. i + ..ori ' xipwoa ~° I'm au i `u ] ~ LjJ V~2 `a~J']Z ZN)<y tV JOJ¢~GOaJ 2<S.WS~G ZZ NUV " 1 u /r 6wr<v<LL µViJ <2._u¢ 9iOI Li i)iwF~~ ii<• uSinC ...i6V N<O Qn .awVRmO J 2-n ¢ OF mw„wn w j']I J~+ u ,n 94J<t¢¢FZ VLw S~U.n9 pUj ~~~~~.--~irJ~ ~a ~,]~.<., ~`,m«~OiJ:i ciao: xs..~x,xxs z.:.. a - mVa ndr]O Nn Q'~I^n0 POU~T,Jnn POPT-MY~PPN P .rv ..,- n oo mn mm m.m.an~ n,rv'-,:: m,~: y.~', n.e ~-m rmr°oooo°a°oroon°n°oo n oo°m°om°oa°r°.,°oo°o°oa °o min v°rOOm OOry00ry00mrvmtV JCO-'~N n.yOy00 J~+PNOn OOJ.vU °^ mOJP ~mOm.~Omrm m a ,>.r MO r- ~'vN0 m.n r J rvr ~ ;i n yi RO~vrymvn 0i"APO-rry i. u.-0~wP mgOPP Vrv' PPPOOOVO00000.~ Oq'o mm a'aq O d.p 000000O.oO0000JO O.ONO aJYOJJ S I mmmmmmmmmmm mr~m mmmmrnm mrl rnm mmmmmmmm.h mrrvm mmmmm r Z vl 2 <L Lul v 2 o rr < O S >- S Y ¢ < L2 .v J O~ O .Y n~ :~: .<YO zoaa `o co <Y Or<... o °r w pY YU n vJV J °T >w YoL~ UUin ZO~JJ~p, P pu O LPYO Op~ .] - wZw C¢U~OP~-r >- r-.iwZ L ir+LVn ¢~ _ UL 00 200 V JZ ~OV x~T~ nOwCO n<ti64 > OOLO~ >SZw1~ _ ~<. sd~ ~a<'iowJY <i~L ti~y~i 64ty .O Z~'2 rrSO V 6'J 4U6 +(d .l rGV~n'.)x UUrr>2~V.uUZ`L>JV]JL?LJr-~+"Ju ~r°Jw'p .iz axw wi°zz'Y ~w onJroe Win" y~r i Oar r-O7~Y w 'JJdJLL uJ K] wi p6 u, y'.nuVUw~ JOV„i> wy<w~i u. S.~iL w'-rrw.~iu <iY .uY i VwulJ m~n.]YN~R Z¢<q¢6¢w¢y'J J~Y¢m~v2 L~/¢gY~r.SYp~u~- ~ V > U r n ~Ji7 U U ~ G _ f 'J. u ~< 20.J ~^ i2 r'.¢w.- L5 xJ VL-Ji Z,iu L~ rV prG V<~ <Zw2, >w<Y ZJU'nN2 O 5'¢ 7 na°.>OY 16V2r~u4rY++2~0r-v<SU J1 ~YJG 'r M ~ZV2<Y> <2~0.1F^UwgZO. ~+V~n w=1L~O VZ>OJ<1<x OT.<lmr <V fYZiy UL w'ri tL °u vc°w r+!/.L<w0<y~-r ivt° U'VZT.V 2vn Ot'<Y~n+UC JYZ°m90 ZUtiL VL Yiu r-OJ i ]t tt ~+rcr JSK40V/.~2vJ¢ONLL'N V-V~+~¢ iiUi LV 7tJ ¢.n 4>OUw /ZY< O<4 OvYO 4«S<Zr-rJ rNV'm~Y<~.cv['C'1JU-rJJiu~~u¢~2J°2u7 ~udKp 6'n0.vi6¢ 6f PmFPPmry~v rPn.rvi uOiPfpP'r"OOTOnOgOJ .~O LO Or~rVn uvOOn n-r mq m rq.~n nawm w'nmo m~n ooPPOOnoooooonoa~o~~o ~o..~odo oo o,,. pm wOODU ~~.~~000000000000PrvO0u~.nOVdOi-OOd Y :~v ±r.YOSOY hSv PO-~J~OP~YYONr- ONV rv7a t +~+ CVO P .+ rv n d ^SY O m N r m 2 ; .~ rv ~. m .~ r d ~- d _ .. u` ~ ~- o~d i . .~m,..mmmmmm mr~m r. ,.,mm r.~nrv r,mmnm,.~rJ ,°~?a a~ 9,..m ;°m,°;.°, mr. " . < ¢ _ -.z i>` z ....... _ o .. .. .. rc ne o~i SAYS Z Sm~J rPJ ZSS t? ~ ~ iY a ~{JU V LL = x''>n - ~J~u` _ wYU ~. Jp n~Jm U~6 ~+ YO^adp Jr r~-]V n vuJY<OJC6P~ ~ uPOOY~P ~Sw „JOi i .tyua.nw ~t~n in -~O V1 ¢'.J u> PO~µO .Jiff iVn °xi ~. _ ~z~ ~Lz :moo d ate- ~ vx.., ._..,..w,zR..,.~,,..i.~ir.r.ea.~,: c`in s.9 ., 9~,~Sw.._~iJ:~.. Yin eL UUU Nl diC i ~ _~ uw Z wJ• ~<u OVO 6r u ~- Y ~ U r _ ~ 7 Ut 7jUF~n irw S<`Cl L u<<Q<c ~ uu IV V~~~-R r6P~Q H~.f~ SLZL7.'f VYSULr u, .L[~Y U~.~,n R6~a 1-U[aY J t ~ 2 i ..V ~nSU SO.J wr~r+YinhU ~ r<~ ~ S><Vr~1 <J).L< ~u SrF-dQ~ u~<^~~J¢y~nr~c Vin in YU~Of]Vrr-O ^~<s <Or-~~y u1-~~6~[iliF[-.J ~.,n~n'~9~J non ewv~w win d •~.n ~n v~^f a~~-JJI .~» 6 -~p~Ph~~.pV .n NN~VN pu~.~ U0~9 ~ ~~T N ~ VOO -~ and OP~+ Y Y mo oin o nti ~..o oi- o n no ~o~+ rrrr~rr ¢ °m mmmmm i i ,~ a z w V ^ w U 0 i o W zN ui aa°d ,V ~: ~N~ >~owii~ ~Va JS~v/ru'.Vn S0= r < pu2i 6j F.~i ~ ') W<O t J f V ~ ~ i.~oaz~ ..z ~n J ~t(~ 6 Vy~ -z a z~n~oc: iy ~xao s c ~ ~. ,, vrv~:ym r 0000000 ooa+ ooi-oPmoao~mNaoooo+~-0popmo J000000 OOrvmOOaFOU~NOm Orm P.pO WOU~PI-O OONPO n OOappp+ mOmnOam a~[.~O rvOn -~O U~00P0 OO+OOON +PmaNPn mm +p'n rvrvN Oti NNrv n N n .~ nN ¢I i < O m N m.+ rv n m 6 O ZI O ^ Z aP0^N aa.-6 PO^N L Pn PIP-PPnrnP9immb0i0 m00wn maumam a:oo mmuaaaaaoaamaaan ii mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm o ii _ x V t ~+ n ~ ~+ i-r r ¢ m m ~ p C J NP <Oh~ O O < a0 J\Ya ')V V J ~ iJ n O s ;V u<a<¢ ~a ¢n~..¢ Iii .< sue.. .~ a i # V ¢w w0¢ ~ J UV OU wp4 .n n V ~~ 2Y UO np0 n202~+ Z¢'m ~n~ <U 00 ux r2 r-ZNw r0_<Um ¢ . Uw~Z xN<i)~uJ:u.m ~Y.,z z,i, ¢JOnI a>u. i+¢~niK~rY 7wo< wl ul~<Nw¢Iwxa mwU<~.< v .a6Jxwwx ¢~nYmV¢>pC rvlU J>V m1V L3UU L..~ 1 ~V <O ~ v < V r •~ < ~ 2 < ^ L 2 V t O•Fiw W <U+¢ < [ - _ _ ~ [J t x_V ~ <K RyNU K n2 ~n2u = i u n0 w nJ.n< O ~n0n< J O a)w~0~ ~~U¢ ~ ZM1 a<w +JOV2tm3-<i << ia~w+ w< <M.z., ¢<zO nain~o.<.m w.~. ~an~oa z o0 0 L m nVU 41 ~+U Or+J2<tiU0<OiU mLL'uu -~ S VZUZ~+YW1~-< i+Y U<r wrW2~+¢w=O=:N<in VO„uOV ZO OpL¢J~FJ P V UU6o~w.i S<. rr m < .n~i ~YpL l« l< f<~-mummmmn l>~n VVLIV UV~U O .~mu~nm mmanOmNmanrvPO+mOnnOrvm N mnmmN+a mPNrm~I .O+ +N mPI-00L P i n .rm mm a mm mm^Pm P.Ni nl P-~mmPTn nmP mNP omoaorvnNOa ooporvwaPOOOmpoPOpoo oooool-oPOOo cP Oi-orva oppnryPOOmoPO O.-o oooN moon ~. ~o o.: .. ,dooooooa6~m mp'pm'ormrooY .u o0 PPCUam NimrmNmmpN OYm .+N mOOa m.y pN ..mY m ppa m j i a u'.r .r .. .r .+ .r mY.ny POrN mar-WPOrrvm Pprrvm iAWNNr9 SSWmm mWma~m6mawl aaa oma.o oooaaaaauai mo .eomoaoa aaaaaaama <si mmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm az 2 x W3 x n n Y P n .~ r .. .J .. w .. u_SiSr V6 4 YOK VN6 wSP>S¢ Z ~Sm 2 O~ Y2nw n.4 OWP O ~ u .V n YN JJ ~) wKJ 4 JNJn ~Ww W W NtrvW O SJ mE r ~N V W ~' tm V UN A .O6N . a:-~n. 9u Ni ~` simiu izPO¢Y a o iN° m pc OR 7Vjtt y00^4 W w~OR9 rV-iP~ wa.° wu..tiawaJ`.` 'zY °ow ~<~n9n0 i4pwwVV >~.va Rr->y ~p _ YOpaOJwJOnOV 6()YF O WIT !. w rTV aV LLN o• ¢LLLLU4n Z~iR i N.Jo- ~o>°~~i ~mi~ou:yri~`.`'~i~ooias~~",.~saLLu~n.z.un°u J S <? M .. <.a in ~V r ? J>m V ~ Z 2 [ ~ ~ ~ GVpV ~+v~2 V6 V O~ u27 ~~ r < < O wy nO0 yrv.~iwY Z~+ `y0 V Uz wSVwwwpm I ~¢a rWON O.z.°as,.;wz azozai aca.. ...Y `ter ~. :~°".< w< ~~<w~w~p ..WW~y~n~~ ~p~~pW`~2az~a~o`''..xLL » `w~`~ aii...i..'~.ni»i~`tN~.,~.`J..N.»mwwwwmizwioi'.,~a3~a~u~ SaJV VU~~VUmaJVnm< pwOe]o0 VS<nYONV3itf mPm nrv r r'OrrPY mOYPmmYY I-pYPmryp P I WaOrm nammPn mrmaan mom//~/mmNmmm.y mmmm m.+m mN OOOOOPd NGmO0Y00 r~DP O+~OOO~n On00 0000000 OOpndpPd mOOmOm O'+mL OOOnOnPO Y70u~O u~00 m nOnm000`n -aOPOOry~~nOnmrunyOP m00 nD v.a pOYr m YOP r W N ~ OOnr N n rvr m.pY .r mPOn yP OrNmY Nu~dy DAwD L9atm Pv dddavaa.paJddod adds dma o'i a.oaiud Y~owi o :i nL ..... .. .. .. .. a o r`< s .. ~¢s.Y.JS° sp s SZZ 2S0¢2 V ~O u~Jr'~i wpr 4' VVp y P O 2V~0WJ J rVY WWI r2 DdV wra u. 9< w(a mUw< CPi LLO V _W ddV4 wd mP iVwm O dtt d Ou~%~ ~Y 00 J .n R <N OY~n ¢O~ O OOO~n wj6 r02w ~`. sorv .~e>>~ei ~z nra ,~`., - .'a a~.L,m o>u,wmi ~pLL r era m. r'" _ ., d:; ::.ior°~~aw°P an.,o.an i.`a N~mm~: ~C Vim S> rY(~r24u0ZV „y6N~a Jr~a J.7 u.6V <ap 7µD0 <o0~n '~ w i .a /~~.i ii n,lOZr V~~rrvUtt;'{VwOV¢Y¢.a uv~O V<v~.i end KSN r.n 00 s j4 a< 0 i .-i 6V~-<V V V v Y O r u Vm t' F V VOZ i V_L J r*V YJy2Y Z LO ~~ wZ r= Ku VKr {0 Y vwij2~L6 b~2>~n w'w^u.<S¢<J`iN2 u32V UOJr<iJ uZr V~+< Vrw-Jw FY y VIZ JOr rcS.Y V6%6w N~~~i raw rJ aaoYY<V030F <t ,. ~[Ol0>ZV T60YjY Z<f Nr+ZOYww Z<<iO~R=Fwn 2: ~~~ Y_rZi r-VI YYJJ J.n iL rOLUCL 20 a. +r.n yY O.a urddw/a w~NOr-~PN n P Dymm myY ~f P~~ ~dN V oo~-o-o onn nmoomoo m... ooorvooo oo.>P OOOnom..n-.o~ oono~ooom rvr-ooomoao+ .+oPamoro..moPOa J L r .+000OPmJP I-Orvom +OPP '00 "iam m0^ YPOrva~n .+rv~ n O T.9P a.n .+a + .r m0 ~~ n + Y 0. .~ ~v ^ r• m i~ Q m L PU^ mP0 Pp.+ p aPOSPPPPPaOVtim~ a^a r~ a~PPPmnmPm PPPJPJ PPSPP P~PPppp PPP Z aaaamm naammmnmMnmmmD ama ammm ammo J 31 m mm mm m mmmn m m mm m J 7 i ik if Y r J 6 rn r ~+ .n r' w K V ¢ K6 P ¢ >na o F PzY2 x o Y~ zoFS ~[i xr m rY-¢~V ap VFW YJWVSSJ m UaLUV P~SP~ r'LW OJ Prt mup u33J rn OZ ar >4 Y iV pO P* aZ4U r SO'n >.ip6tU r%r ~ow-~¢~,¢- oi~'aYa ~i wo.~Oo .6i ~-. w7w Y]:7wV¢ 07 <OWw GO.+ OaOOri rn 0 /. V.J ~-.m VUmL NS ~ZbJUO~ ¢F~a - w+¢° ~zeys">xaoo~i~`,z zw aw ¢.oo r;r 7>pN< aSU 6.K' VOi wtl iryL2 LLLS ~-YS 07720 wtw ~ wSw u[wr.w ¢>~•3OarNOwu uSwS ..~z a.boa°-.. sr.. .:"iw. i...r'.>a n'~i~o:ia °a o.~izu¢~. mzb<~ r V U r J r2 Z > C) ¢ u Urp r U~ O > +P ..~ s u r .~ ~ r ~o b oa r cwb _ Y r~0 ¢V 6Vm Z _ 2 ~•~ >r>i V' w UZ6 ZJw ~< L< ~b~i f>w V> < •m ~o.~.w ziw ?a YO U2 [Z]»puW¢a. wVUf9 'Jt iaJ .nO o.6o f7v~it)~~~ w?tr.i~¢O V>~r+¢ OVV Vh u ° _ b~.+nozu •.z¢~..+. oYoa fo~aa o ~~0~"V Y.u 3a f>•+6 M1~ n~-¢N.n vSn< p¢K¢i~ zZw Zb~n K S66ww OIS~U U6tmN0 ~ 'u S~u>l.xn ~S>w O VVO J~Nw~-r ~> KJV 06~mULbOOws~u22U< M>6ZZZ n:o,zzz~zo~o oowba.)bnmambw¢¢¢¢¢<¢¢z J~'¢¢i„~mN aamPm ~ mao+mPna..aP +o'an mom r r mama ~~ :i i~ V v `z ooc°~n-.c ac~mo+o°oo~ori--. o o~o~-omo+or +o~-c o°o+o.o mo ,vo~ry oa ~.:or P°o ~ _ m o rv .. v .. rv .. ~ o rum .. ,~ _.N w.. a, ..mm,.~l....~~,w,°mmm,.~,..~m°~m°mP,~nm 0 r i ~a .... .. .. .. ~ iuo c~i~o ~ r' ~~ .~ . w .n .~., ooWP as "L° W°IJ c oL~ 0o mix °~ Wi,~. .. ziws~~ e J~o:¢m ,moo ou<n°o+iz'`rc .`~ nom.". i,i ~` > > V rtLL our <T~V< ~.~aQ ~_ Y=^ wU 2w Gw~ vL~i O>V °~ rvVruVnNUiO.n¢v,wV .+V<a2y ~L w.i~ Z ~I w V J :~O r <r `L6 ~ u~ VT <~ LAY wwti Q.n ^OrX ~j:] a r.{Z¢(tt V•crQV~r-r.l 4lV¢SijU aI.L>v3i><¢ wVZ2i w1~J S,n'rtL _ L<x rr-r,-r w ¢'.)Ul^'>OfJ LL=u KZ<22ww +PJ~4rv -'YmT J %>nP+m `NPO^ /~ - CITY OF RANCHO Ci;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT Oate: September 20, 1989 To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager From: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director Subject: CARRYOVER FURDS FROM FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 TO FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 The City Council authorize the carryover of funds from fiscal year 1988/89 to fiscal year 1969/90 as outlined in this staff report, and authorize the transfer of the Fvnd 11 carry fa rward funds to Fund 09. BACK6ROUND• Each fiscal year there are projects and activities that were budgeted and not started until late in the fiscal year, thus, will not be completed until after the new fiscal year begins. As a result, the funds budgeted for those projects and activities in the fiscal year need to be carried forward into the new fiscal year to allow for completion and payment of the projects and activities but straddle between budget years. This carryover is consistent wi :h the budget recently approved. Staff has developed a list of the fund and account numbers needing to be carried forward from fiscal year 1988/89 to fiscal year 89/90. These are listed below: General Fund 01-4124-6028 S 8,000.00 O1-4150-1100 10,000.00 ' 01-4151-7044 i2 ,000 ,00 O1-4245-7044 21,000.00 O1-4265-1901 20,000.00 O1-4333-3900 21,000,00 O1-4333-6028 256,640.00 O1-4532-6028 7,710.00 O1-4647-7044 5,800.00 Gai Tax i1-4637-3931 243.00 11-4637-6028 15,665.04 11-4637-7045 11,982.97 11-4637-8022 1,450.81 11-4637-8104 1,752.10 11-4631-8113 6,857.07 // Staff Report September 20, 1989 Page 2 SB325/TDA 12-4637-8826 S 51,353,34 12-4637-8821 54,860.28 12-4637-8829 49,555.11 12-4637-8831 76,600.00 12-4637-8832 81,607,79 Beautification 21-4647-8822 12,700.00 21-4641-8842 20,000.00 ~i-4647-9844 10,000.00 21-4641-8845 51,387.47 Systems Development 22-4637-8743 324,433,00 22-4637-8748 4,615,02 22-4637-6755 12,054.42 22-4637-8850 123,332.56 Drainage-General City 23-4637-8765 73,600.00 23-4637-8802 1,305.00 23-4631-8862 111,122.56 Landscape Dist.44 43-4130-8956 131,726.00 COBG 28-4333-8194 89,363.00 28-4333-8181 300,000,00 28-4333-8811 6,495.00 Resp{e/~c~tful~l`/y,'/s~~u/~~~mitt~ed, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH/dab [ v - CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 20, 1989 To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager From: Jim Hart, Mministrative Services Di rec tar Subject: FINAL 1988/89 BUDBETARY ADJUSTMENTS Approve all final 1988/89 budgetary adjustments for the Special Revenue, Capital Project and Debt Service Funds. BACK6NWN0: On an annual basis, as part of the fiscal year-end close process, certain final adjustments are needed to account for accruals in various funds that were not anticipated, but recorded as part of the year-end closure. The recording of these accruals is necessary to Droperly account for activity in the funds that occurred in the 1988/89 fiscal year, so as not to burden the resources of the 1989/90 fiscal year. T4 n.n i<nnl •A: nlnnn l_•_ _ A_n_4_ailnA of fan hmnn} !n !h1 n• W\~~ ... ~.... ~..u. ..-y ::r-..~-.. nn ..~_ .n an ....... ~~... _~._ ._ _ C nO nn effect the June 30, 1969, financial statements. Respectful ly~s uybmi tted , Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH/d ah af. t.n[hmrnl. /3 APPROPRIATIONS Increase Decrease Fund 15-4637 8050 Slurry Seal 8621 Res. St. Rehab Phase I 2,414.00 203.00 Fund 63-4130 6028 Contract Services Fund 81-4637 3900 Maintenance and Operations 1910 Payments to Trustee Fund 86-4637 3900 Maintenance and Operations 60"c8 Contract Services f L'l IV >V~YJ JL 3900 Maintenance and Operations Fund 96-4631 3900 Maintenance and Operations 7910 Payments to Trustees Fund 82-4991 9000 Transfers Out 29,918.00 5,114.00 61,960.00 5,572.00 2,560,348.00 1,285.00 1,890.00 3,578.00 71,412.00 /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Linda Beek, Junior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Project, located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Haven Avenue, to be funded from Beautification Funds Account Na. 21-4647-8719 (FY 89-90) RECOMIENOATION: It is recommended that City Cou~il approve plans and specifications for the Naven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Protect, located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Haven Avenue, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject protect plans and specifications have been completed by RJM Design Group, reviewed by staff and aDDroved by the City Engineer. The tngineer's estimate for construction is 5140,OOU.00. Legal advertising 1s scheduled for September 2B, 1989, and October 5, 1989, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m., Thursday, October 19, 1989. Respectf submitted, R :LB:sj Attachment /~ RESOLUTION N0. p 9- A RESOLUTION ~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'HAVEN AVENUE GATENAY ENTRY NONUMENT IMPROVEMENT PR0.lECT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOURTH STREET AND HAVEN AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS. NHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Project, located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Haven Avenue". BE IT FURTHER RESOLYEO that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially fn the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIYEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Cierk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 19 day of October 1989, sealed bids or proposals for the "Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Project, located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Haven Avenue" in said City. Bids will 6e opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Did for Construction of Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument improvement Pro,J P<: t, 14ra ted at tha northeast corner of Fourth Street and Haven Avenue". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the (~ Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California 1s required to and has deterniined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for arty work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship Drogram in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of .l,II1rPl1}irPC }A i(111Y11PVmPI1 }ha} Yill IIP IICPf~ in YhP flPrf(11",IIaI1rP r,f }hP contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to flue except: A, khen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of IS percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. Nhen the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. ~7 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 1n the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements myy be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its brarH;h offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon arty of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight IB) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the appllcaDle collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at feast ten percent (lOL) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the raw ~f Yanrhn ri~r a,w,naa If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for Lhe perfornwnce of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work ar labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not Seen issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~~ Contractor shall possess a Ciass 'A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file Tn the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at Lhe office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f25.00, said 525.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will De mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of (10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be require6 to enter into a contract satisfactory Lo the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reJect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 1989. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 1989. ATTEST: y er ADVERTISE ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 OCTOBER 5, 1989 /~ -- CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 ~; TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry 8. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: REFUND OF 1988/89 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENTS - CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY It is recommended that City Council authorize the implementation of the refunding of the 1988/89 landscape assessments in the amount of $195.00 to residents within the Caryn Planned Community who have paid their 1968/89 property taxes and assessments. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As of this date the City has not accepted any landscaping for maintenance within the Caryn Planned Community. City StaFE is working closely with the developer to insure quality iandseaping is maintained. This has necessitated the need Eor irrigation repairs, replanting of various plant materials ..A •h vr~~~nA •Fn n~aL~lirFmnn~ nA CV~Gc _.._ _~__.. ~__.. _y.. _.._ ^..______..... _.. .. r_____. _____ __ confident several areas will be accepted Eor maintenance during fiscal year 1989/90. spectfui~Q(ly submit~'-~ . Jerry Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF:de ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Concurrence with City Engineer approval of updated Current City policy and procedure for various Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts within the City. RECO{IEIDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council approve by minute action, the attached updated policy and procedure for the sub,~ett districts. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS During the past several years, several new Landscape/Lighting Districts have been Posed to address the issues of maintenance by the City of Landscape areas and street lights in newly developed or proposed developing areas throughout the entire city. This growth in the number of districts has necessitated the updating of current policy and procedure to incorporate those districts. The attached policy and procedure documents suamwrize, in conformance with the original district formation documents, the boundaries of the various districts, type of pro,~ects to be annexed and the assessment rate for those pro,{ects. The documents also define the typical landscape areas which are to be incorporated in the Maintenance Nork Program and the permit/inspection/acceptance procedure for these work program areas. Respec ubmitted, /~'-'~-~ ~ RN e:l Attachments Total Cl. Pages zn CI. AMEXATIpI TO STREET LI6MT AID LAIDSWIPE DISTRICT PRDCEWRE Preface 1. All proposed projects (Tract Map, Parcel Map, D.R., CUP and MDR) are required by the Planning Conwission or City planner as a "Condition of Approval" of the projects to join Landscape and Lighting District. 2. Projects are annexed to specific Districts and its work program areas (the areas and/or other Items which are to be maintained by the districts) are determined in accordance with Lhe annexation Policy set 1n Exhibit "A" and .,D.. 3. Ali annexation items are set for the City Council Agenda as consent calendar item at the same time as the corresponding projects tract or parcel maps and/or bonds and agreements are set for City Council approval. Where no map or bond is involved, this item is set for City Council agenda for approval concurrent with the issuance of building permit. 4. Occasionally, the City malt' choose to initiate Lhe annexation of some specific projects to the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts. This process will require approval by the City Council througA public hearing process pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" of the California Street and Highway Code. The processing of those "specific" projects shall be coordinated with Lhe Resource Service pepartment. Administrative Procedure 1. The developer of the project shall be required to submit the "Consent and Waiver" form (see ExhlDtt "C") for annexing to Landscape and Lighting District duly signed by all the legal owners of the property to the Development Processing Section prior to recordation of map or issuance of building permit, whichever occurs first. 2, Project Engineer (In-house staff in charge of the project) is responsible to set the annexation item for City Council agenda as Consent Calendar item in accordance with "City Council Agenda Procedure" (See Englneeririg Procedure Manual). 3. The Ctty Council report package shall include the following: 1. Staff report providing Background/Analysis and Recomxendation for ri ty rouncil action. 2. Resolution ordering the annexation including exhibits for the project boundary and the itemized list of work program areas as referred in the resolution. Sample copies of the report package are enclosed as Exhibit "D". 2a- C1 Page 2 4. After approval of the annexation by the City Council, the Resource Service DeparGaent w111 receive a copy of the approved resolution for their use. 5. A copy of the staff report and the approved resolution is kept in the pro,~ect file and a copy is transaitted to the Xaintenance Department. a3 C1. Page 3 E)DIIBIT "A' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD) LMD No. 1 - "GENERAL CITY' District Boundary: All Residential Properties within certain portions of the City, excluding all properties within the boundaries of LMO No.'s 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and Commercial/Industrial properties of LMD No. 3. (See Exhibit "E".) Note: -This district is generally located within the westerly part of the City comprising of Alta Loma areas and a portion of Cucamonga areas.) Nork Program Area: a. Certain parkways and median islands within the District boundary per page 10 of Exhibit "A". b. Gateways within the district boundary. c. Street trees within all parkways. d. Community Equestrian trails. e. Freeway slopes adtacent to residential protects. (Subtect to City Council authorization.) Proiects to be Annexed: a. All RESIDENTIAL (Single Family and Multi-family) subdivisions within the District boundary. b. Residential Subdivisions within LMO No. 3 boundary. kote: 1. Individual single family residences and institutional protects are not annexed. 2 Commercial protects within this district boundary are annexed to LMD No. 38 ). Assessment Unit: a. Single family residence: 1 dwelling Unit = 1 Assessment Unit b. Multi-family residence: 1 dwelling Unit = 0.5 Assessment Unit a~ cl. Page 4 EXHIBIT "A" LND No. 2 - "VICTORIA' District Boundary: Victoria Planned Community boundary as approved by Ordinance No. No. 143, as amended by Resolution No. 392 and others "outpieces" as shown on the District boundary nap. (See Exhibit "E".) Nork Program Area: a. Victoria Park Lane. b. Parkways per page 10 of Exhibit "A" c. Street trees within parkways and within dedicated easements. d. Parks, including lighting. e. All public trail systems, including lighting. f. Freeway slopes. (Subtect to City Council authorization.) Protects to Annexed: a. All residential protects. b. Non-residential protects (Commercial/Industrial/Institutional ). c. Vacant lots. Note: Original Wctoria Planned Community area per Ordinance No. 143 has previously been annexed to the District. As further subdivisions occur, re-annexation need not to be done, only reapportionment is done for assessment purposes. Nhen development occurs on those properties outside the original community area per Ordinance No. 143, those new developments shall require annexation. e«"«.e=~ a"~~. a. Residential (single 8 multi-family): 1 dwelling Unit = 1 Assessment Unit b. Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units c. Vacant Land: 4.0 acres - 1.0 Assessment Unit ~5 C1. Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" LMD No. 3 - "INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL" (LMD No. 3A b 3B) District Boundary: a. Industrial and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas. b. Non-restdenti al areas within LMD No. 1 boundary. (See Exhibit "E") Mork Program Area: a. A71 median islands within the District boundary. 6, Special parkway locations (Example: Northeast corner of 6th Street and 0uffalo). c. Freeway slopes adjacent to Cawxercial/Industrial projects. (Subject to City Council authorization.) d. Special Area - Retention basin, t-15 slopes for PM 7349 (LMD No. 3A). Projects to be Annexed: a. All Non-residential (Commercial, Industrial, etc.) projects within this boundary. b, All Non-residential projects wt thin LMD No. 1 boundary. Note: All residential projects within this boundary are annexed to LMD No. 1 Assessment Unit: a. Zone A: (LMD No. 3A) PM 7349: 1 Lot 1 Assessment Unit (for the cost of maintaining landscaping, storm drain and retention basin with the Darcel map boundary). b. Zone B: (All other projects - LMD No. 38) Industrial/Commercial/Institutional: 1.0 acres 1.0 Assessment Unit LMD No. 4 - "TERRA Y[STA" District Boundary: All of Terra Yista Community Boundary as approved by Ordinance No. 190, excluding the proposed Central park area. (See Exhibit "E") ~b C1. Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" Work Program Area: a, Certain parkways in residential areas per page 10 of Exhibit "A". b. Street trees within parkways and within dedicated easement, c. Public parks, greenways, trails and gateways, including lighting. d. Median Islands. Note: 1/2 width of the median islands on the peripheral streets of the boundary. Projects to be Annexed: a. RESIDENTIAL (single 8 multi-family) projects within the district boundary b. Non-residential (Commercial, Industrial, Institutional, etc.) projects within the district boundary. c. Vacant properties. Assessment Unit; a. Sing'.e family residence: i dwelling Unit = 1 Assessment Unit b. Multi-family residence: 1 dwelling Unit = 0.5 Assessment Unit c. Non-residential projects: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units d. Vacant properties: 4.0 acres 1.0 Assessment Untii LMD No. 5 - "TOT LOTS" District Boundary: Tract 11915-1 (See Exhibit "E") Note: This tract is also included in LIU No. 1. 4prk Pregram area: a. Tot lot within the boundary. b. Open space areas within the Lract. a~ C1. Page 7 E%NIBIT "A" Protect to be Annexed: Tract 11915-1 only Note: This district stands on its own. No additional areas will be annexed into this district. Assessment Unit• 1 Dwelling Unit = 1 Assessment Unit Note: --This Lract is also annexed in LND No. 1. LMD No. 6 - "CARYN" District Boundary: All City areas North of Highland Avenue, Between Deer Creek Channel and Day Creek Channel. (See Exhibit 'E") Nork Program Area: a. Parkways per page 10 of Exhibit "A". b. Median islands r.. All oubtic Darks. trail systems. oaseos. Greenwavs. etc.. including all appurtenant improvements. d, Street trees within parkways and within dedicated easements. e. Freeway slopes. (Subtect to City Council authorization.) Protect to be Annexed: a. All residential protects. b. Non-residential Protects (COamercial/Instttutionai). c. Vacant Lot. Assessment Unit: a. Residential (single and multi-family): 1 dwelling Unit 1 Assessment Unit b. Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units c. Vacant lot: 4.0 acres - 1.0 Assessment Unit ~~ C1. Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" LMD No. 7 - "ETINANDA NORTH' District Boundary: All city areas East of Daffy Creek Channel and North of Highland Avenue. Mork Program Area: a. Parkways per page 10 of Exhibit "A" b. Median Islands c. All public regional and community trafl systems including all appurtenant improvements. d. Public parks, greenways, paseos or greenway systems, including all appurtenant improvements. e. Street trees within parkways and dedicated easement. f. Freeway slopes. (Subtect to City Council authorization.) Protects to be Annexed: a. All residential protects. b. Non-residential Protects (Commercial/Institutional). Assessment Unit: a. Residential (Single and Multi-family): 1 Dwelling Unit Assessment Unit. b, Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Unit LMD #B - "ETINANDA SOUTH"- Distrlct Boundary: All City areas East of Etiwanda Avenue, Between Foothill Boulevard and Highland Avenue including the traingular property bounded by I-15, Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. ~9 C1. Page 9 EXHIBIT "A" work Program Area: a. Parkways per page 10 of Exhibit "A" b. Median Isiands c. Ail yublic regional and comaunity trail systems including all appurtenant improvements. d. Pubiic parks, greenways, paseos or greenway systems. e. Street trees within parkways and dedicated easement. f. Freeway slopes. (Subtect to City Council authorization.) Protects to be Annexed: a. All residential protects. b. Non-residential Protects (Cammerdal/Institutional). Assessment Unit: a. Residential (single and Multi-family): 1 Dwelling Unit ~ Assessment Unit. b. Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Unit CI. Page 10 FIWIBIT 'A' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD1 1. Mat or street parkways and adtacent slopes along "Back-On" lots in single family residential subdivisions. 2. Darkways on side streets along "Side-On" lots when contiguous to (11 above. 3. All street trees in parkways. 4. Other street trees in dedicated easements. 5. Designated public Greenbelts, Paseos, Trails (pedestrian and bicycle) and contiguous areas as appropriate. 6. Community Equestrtal Trails when located within parkways, easements and Greenbelt areas. 7. Certain Railroad embankments, freeway slopes and Utility corridors under special condition by Planning Commission. (Subtect to City Council authorization.) 8. City Entry Monuments. 9. Median Islands. 10. Public Parks and Lands. a. Parkways contignous to mu1tT-family residential subdivisions. Note: Certain parkways on orator streets may be annexed to the work program depending on the design of the Drotect and only at the discretion of the City Engineer. b. All parkways except street trees adtacent to Coalnerctal/Industrial and Institutional protects. c. Parkways along residential corner property when it is not contiguous to City-maintained parkways. d, Private-trails, private-parks, tot lots except for Tract 11915-1. ~/ C1. Page it EXHIBIT 'B' STREET LIGHT iMINTENANCE DISTRICT (SEND) SLMD Y1 - "MAJOR STREETS" District Boundary: All areas throughout the City. Nork Program: Street lights on ma,)or streets (Arterials and certain collector streets as shown on the map, Exhibit "E" - "Work Program Areas for SLMD M1.) Pro3ects to 6e Annexed: a. All Residential Subdivisions (Single and Multi-family). b. All Non-residential IComaercial/Industrial/Institutional) projects. Assessment Unit: a. Single family projects: 1 dwelling Unit ~ 1 Assessment Unit 6, Multi-family projects: 1 dwelling Unit ~ 1 Assessment Unit c. Industrial/Comaerciai and Institutional projects: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units SLMD N2 - "CITY NIOE" District Boundary: a. All City areas except properties within SLMD N'S 3, 4, 5 and Commeercial/Industrial areas of SLMD M6. (See Exhibit "E") b. Ait residential areas in SLMD N6. Nork Program: All street lights within the district boundaries except those in SLMD dl. Projects Lo be Annexed: a. Single Family Residential Subdivisions within this district boundary. b, Single Family Residential within SLMD X6 boundary. Nate: Multi-family residential projects are not annexed. 3~ C1. Page 12 EXHIBIT "B" Assessment Unit: Single Family Residence: 1 dwelling Unit = 1 Assessment Unit SLMD M3 - "VICTORIA COMMUNITY" District Boundary: a. Victoria Planned Community area as approved by Ordinance No. 143 as amended per Resolution No. 392. 6, All other "out-pieces" as shown on the District Boundary Map. (See Exhibit "E"1 Work Program: All street lights within the district boundary, except those in SLMO Ml. Protects to 6e Annexed: a. Single and Multi-family Residential Subdivisions. b. Non-residential (Commercial/institutional, etc.) projects. Assessment Unit: a. Single family residential: 1 dwelling Unit ~ 1 Assessment Unit h Mul ii-family rPN APnt1a1: 1 AMell ina Ilnit ~ 1 AasesSment Unit c. Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units SLMD M4 - "TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY" District Boundary: Terra YSsta Punned Community as approaved by Ordinance No. 190, excluding the proposed Central Park area. (See Exhibit "E") Nork Program: All street lights within the district boundary except those in SLDD N1. Projects to be Annexed: a. Single and Multi-family Residential Subdivision. b. Non-residential (Industrial/Commercial/Institutional etc.) projects. C1. Page 13 E1(H IBIT_B" Assessment Unit: a. Single family residential: 1 dwelling Unit = 1 Assessment Unit b. Multi-family residential: 1 dwelling Unit = 0.5 Assessment Unit c. Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units SLMD N5 - "CARYN" District Boundary: A11 City areas north of Highland Avenue, between Deer Creek channel and Day Creek Channel. (See Exhibit "E"1 Mork Pragram• All street lights within the district boundary except those in SLMD 81. Protects to be Annexed: a. Single Family Residential Subdivisions. b. Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 2.0 Assessment Units SLMD M6 - INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL a. Industrial and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas. b. Non-residential (Commercial/Industrial, etc.) areas within SLMD d2 district boundary. (See Exhibit "E"1 Mork Program: Ali street lights within the district boundary except those to SLMD N1. ects to be Annexed: a. Non-residential (Commercial/Industrial, etc.) protects within the district boundary. b. Non-residential protects within SLMD M2 boundary. Assessment Unit: Non-residential: 1.0 acre = 1.0 Assessment Unit C1. Page 14 EXNIBIT 'L' CONSENT AMD WIPER TO AMNEXIITION FOR WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terns of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the "Act"), being Division 15, Dart 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. and Street Lighting Main enance District No. (hereinafter referret~as the "Maintenance District"); and, WHEREAS, the provisions of Article II of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the legislative bogy to order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance Distrlc t; and, WHEREAS, the legislative body may, pursuant to said provisions of the Act, order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report" as would otherwise be required by the provisions of the Act Tf all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed have given written consent to the proposed annexation; and, WHEREAS, the undersigned, the owners of all property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District, acknowledge that pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the undersigned would be entitled to notice and hearing and the preparation of an Engineer's "Report" pertaining to the annexation of the property owned by the undersigned to the Maintenance District. The undersigned, however, acknowledge that they are aware of the proposed annexation to the Maintenance District of the property owned by the nnAn r<i~nnA anA ratua any anA alt ri aht rhi [h the unAarci aned may nOw have to notice and hearing or the filing of an Engineer's "Report" pertaining to the annexation of the undersigneds' property to the Maintenance Distrlc t. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby declared by the undersigned property owners as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the undersigned, constituting the owners of the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and further constituting all of Lhe property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance Distrlc t, hereby consent to the proposed annexation of said property to the Maintenance District without notice and hearing ;,r f{ling of an Engineer's "Report" pertaT ni ng to such annexation. DATED: ~~ C1. Page 15 EIfHIBIT °C' CERTIFIGTE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AID WIPER TO AMNElU1T10M FOR TO STREET LI6IITIN6 KAINfEMAMCE DISTRICT N0--~ AID STREET LI6NTIM6 ININTEMANCE DISTRICT M0- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY Of SAN BERNAROIND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RUSSELL H. MAGUIRE, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That I am the duly appointed CITY ENGINEER of the C[TY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA. That on the ddy of 1989, I reviewed a Consent and Naiver to Annexe on pertain ng a annexation of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Naiver to Annexation t0 be examined and my examination revealed that said Consent and Natver to Annexation has Deen signed by the owners of all of the property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Maiver to Annexation meets the requirements of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. EXECUTED this day of 1989, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3~ C1. Page 16 EXHIBIT "D" DATE: T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Ageement, Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. for located at/on submitted by RECONENDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving accepting the suhject agreement and security, ordering a annexa on andscape Maintenance District No, and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. and authoring the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreeme~a~ to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS located at/on the __ _ _ _ c_ rSr4 uae annrnvP v P Ann na_ .(mil SS On one ~ ~ for the~Aivision of acres into lots parce s. The Developer, is submitting an agreement and recur guaran ee a cons ruc on of the off-side improvements in the foil owing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond; f Labor and Material Bond: f Copies of the agreement and security are available in Lhe City Clerk's Office. 1_Pttgr: of auuroval have Geen revived fra'n the high school and elementary school distracts and Cucamonga County Nater District. C.C. 8 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by Lhe Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, RHM: Attachments 3~ C1. Page 17 EXNIB iT "D" RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAlN)NGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. AND FOIC- WHEREAS, the City Council pf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. and Street Lighting Main enance District No. _ (hereinafter referredT as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NNEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct, SECTION 2: That-this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper es shown 1n Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future Droceedings of the Maintenance District, including ire Tevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. C1. EXHI9IT "D" Page Ie ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. ANNEXATION N0. ~/ i ~~ --7 ~ „rs _ _- ~ _ ~. ~,J ~. ~ i r.l... ~~`dtY, .'~ ~ ~ ~ i ~--, . ~ ~• r ,' , ,. },`~ p _ ~ I r~ x'1.11,11 „ I I , --; •J---~-iu~ -`-`~~-L' ~'~ ~ ~ 1 I r'---- ---~~_Y~ ~`J \'l, - . / I , NOTE: WHERE APPLICABLE, EXHIBIT TO SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGES OF ALL AREAS TO BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT TURF GROUNDCOVER PROJECT. sp. f[. s Street 19th Street 12,845 PLEASE SHOW LEGEND CF AREAS TO 'nenid„ of M..^.I NTA: HED Pd rkway Trail LEGEND: ~~ GROUNOCOVER ,~"`tea ~/ 1/,\ ~': CITY OF RANCHO'C(JCA,~IOINGA TRACT 12952 , ~ ~ ~?~' ENGINEE _ ;~ ~ bt6 - RING DIVISION ~ , VICINITY MAP 11n 1 ~~ EXHIBIT "D" C1. Page 19 EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf nict rirt Nn ttrnot Naaw C~ ft Ground Cover Trees Cn ft Fa I C1. Page 20 a a a 6 ~ i~ ~ ¢ ~~ ~ is ~ I1~~ a EXHIBIT "E" ®~~e i i~ ~ i _'~L; inr, 1;~~-~---' 'e - ' S i ~.. -..~1. O ! ~ -_ ~ i t_ /~ Y ' W \~ $ ! 5 Y• ~ i Y ~ ~~'~ S~~ ~ .~ t r ~~ Pil S. _~_ -"-r ~. ~7 _ '" ~ _. _ ..zc. r T'+ __ '~ - l- - ~ 11- -m -r ~-~ ~ -~' i~- _. - ~. ~ __ _. Sg ~ '~~ ti-_' -i F I ~,_ ~ ._ _ _ y~ ~~ L EXHiRTT "F" V \ r ~ U V 'V F y = O ti W t 4 ~ ~ 2 F F ~ /~ V H \~ ~ r- - / ~ ' iY7~;~ .~ . N _- ~i Q ~ - W - t a . ~ 'tt'3 i I ~ ~ _ Q 1 ._ y _ r _~ ~ ~ iJ4~ -~y~r T ~~!' , - Iii t r J ~. - ~ ~L 4~-- ,^~- _ i r - r..r. i -Iy - r l r 1` i i ~ri r. r -- ~ -, 1 r , 'l l . ' ~i -~ ;,v ~ 4, __. «.. ~~ C1, Page 22 LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION, STREET TREE AND STREET LIGHT PERMIT/INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE City/District Maintained Landscape Areas 1, All landscape/irrigation installation that is to be City/District maintained shall require a separate "Construction Permit". Applicant shall submit an application fora Construction Permit to the Engineering Division in the same manner that is required for other public improvements to be constructed in public rights-of-way or easements. 1. In addition to all other requirements, the plans for assessment district or public maintained landscaped areas shall show assessment district number and plant establishment periods. No inspection or work in the public right-of-way is to occur without valid permit. 2. The inspector shall inspect all trenching, pipe materials and sizes, valves, control wires, controller, pressure test, backfill etc, pursuant to "Green Book" Speciffcations and City Standards. Inspector shall inspect planting for fertilization, root control, soil amendments, backfill, spacing location, size, and healthiness. The inspector shall seek the assistance of the Maintenance Section regarding questions concerning healthiness of plant matertal. 3 All irrina ti nn rnntrnllor< anA motor naAoetalc chap he fully enrl need dual purpose (single cabinet for electric meter and controller) enclosure with approved size and type of controller. i. During the establishment period, the inspector shall make regular monthly inspections and notify developer of any deficiencies. One month prior to end of establishment period the inspector along with the Maintenance Section shall inspect landscaping for final clean-up and acceptance. Anything other than minor plant replacement, minor weeding, etc. shall require the developer to continue the establishment period for the required period far the new plant material. When acceptance is to be considered by City Council, the inspector shall make final inspection to insure all clean-up items have been completed. Engineering shall supply the Special Districts Management Department with iuudre fJU tdue dfid 0stlrea feA mnn T,hiy rpc4. fnr any 13nd5rapinD within 3 district. 5. Acceptance will not 6e recommended to City Council until such time all other improvements have been completed and are also to be recommended for acceptance, assessments, if appropriate, are in effect as cleared by the SPecial Districts Management Department and the 1 year 10% maintenance bond for public improvements including landscape and irrigation guaranteeing workmanship and materials have been received by the City. Y J C1. Page 23 Property Owner Maintained Landscaped Areas 1. All landscape/irrigation installation to occur in public rights-of-way or easements that is W be maintained by the property owner(s) will be included in the permit for the construction of the other improvements within rights-of-way or easments. A. If there are no other improvements, a separate permit will be required. 1. Applicant shall provide, at time of submitting application, one set of private landscape/irrigation plans stamped approved by the Planning Di vision. B. No inspection or work in the public right-of-way is to occur without valid permit. 2. On property owner maintained landscape areas, the inspector shall inspect trenching, depth, pipe material and size, and backfilling. Inspector shall inspect plant materials for size, location, spacing and root control. The inspector shall seek assistance from the Planning Division for inspection of planting and compliance with conditions of approval. 3. Owner maintained landscape areas will be cleared when all landscaping is 100% germinated and Planning Division has been consulted and all other public improvements have been completed and are to be accepted. Street Trees 1 all c•rnat 4reac to ha nlan4nA Tn nuhlir riohi<_nf_rav nr Daemonic will be permited under a landscape/irrigation construction permit or other improvement permit, whichever is appropriate. A. If no other permit exists, a separate permit will be required. 1. Applicant shall provide, at time of submitting application, one set of tree planting plans or minor drawing, whichever 15 appropriate for size of project, stamped approved by the Engineering Division. 2. On all projects, Including local streets, the inspector shall inspect all tree staking and tying. Stakes shall be installed per City Standards and shall be secure, Ttes shall be per City Standards and all protruding wires shall be stapled to stake and trlmned. Ties shall be of sufficient diameter to allow for considerable future growth while still providing tree iJpuaPL. Trees will be accepted at the Lime other improvements are accepted. A. If there are no other improvements, trees will be accepted in the same manner as C1tyjDistrict maintained landscaped areas. -! 7 C1. Page 24 Street Lights Street tight installation will be permited under the construction permit for the construction of other improvements. 2. Street lights shalt be complete and energized prior Lo recawnendation for acceptance. Street lights will be accepted at time the other inprovements are accepted provided assessments, if appropriate, are in effect as cleared by the Special Districts Management Department or other arrangements have been made for the pdyment of energy charges by developer. 3. Engineering shall supply the Special Districts Management Department with the number of arterial and/or local street lights prior to deterniinatlon of deposit requirements. ys CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner g~ . SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-19 - UNIVERSAL ARCRDE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request to esta hl ish an arcade in a leased space of 850 square feet within an existing commercial center of 1.26 acres of land in the General Conme rc sal District, located at the Southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malven gvenue - APN: 209-041-51. 1. BACKGROUND: At its meeting on September 6, 1989, the City Council voted 4-1-0 to deny Conditional Use Permit 89-19 for the establishment of a video game arcade. Attached is the Resolution of Oenial which Lhe Council directed staff to prepare. Respect lly submi ed, Brad 8ulle Lity Plann r BB:SR:js y~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-406 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCP.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVERSING THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND DENYING COND IT[ONAL USE PERMIT 89-19 FOR RN ARCADE TO OPERATE [N AN E%ISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER ON 1.26 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MAL VEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FI NOI NGS IN SU PPd2T THEREOF - A.PN: 209-042-51. A. Recitals. (i) Are application has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Terrence Batiste and Michael Earl (hereinafter "applicants") for a Conditional Use Permit for an arcade totaling 850 square feet of an existing commercial center located on 1.26 acres of land at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malven Avenue. (iil On July 12, 1989, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date by adopting Resolution No. 89-93, thereby approving Conditional Use Permit 89-19 subject to eighteen (18) stated conditions. (iii) The Planning Commission's approval of the application was timely appealed to this Council on July 21, 1989, by Jeff and Janice Abbott (hereinafter "appelant"). public hearing on the appeal~of Conditional Use~Permit 89-19 and~cont inued thiat hearing until September 6, 1989. B. Resolution NOW, TNER EFOR E, it is hereby fou M , determined and resolved by the City Council of the City'of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council f~ereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meetings on August 16, 1984 and September 6, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically .:.^.dS ... fC! iows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Malven Avenue, APN: 209-041-51, and with a street frontage of 485 feet and lot depth of 213.5 feet and is presently improved with an existing commercial center; and `7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. CUP 89-19 - ARCPDE Septe~er 20, 1989 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a gas station and single family homes, the property to the south of that site consists of the offices of the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the property to the east is the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, and the property to the west is a fast food restaurant; and (c) The application contemplates the operation of an arcade con r.sting of 20 video game nac pines within ar, BSO square foot leased space; and (d) The applicant stated that the hours of operation would 6e from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days a week, and that minors under the age of eighteen would not be allowed inside during school hours; and (e) The applicant indicated that a minimum of 2 adults would 6e present to conduct and supervise the subject use; and (f) The Cucamonga Elementary School is located less than one-half a mile from the site, and two other schools are located less than two miles away. The Board of Trustees of the Cucamonga School District have stated their opposition to the arcade as income ati6le to the area and would 1 create supervision and safety problems for the school; and (g) The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department has stated that there have been problems with fighting and loitering at other arcades within the City; and l4. ~nl tj - i yu`v - u i ~iy ~ uyMCUi of Conditional Use Permit 489-19 and~add res se dVposs ib le~co ncerns and ~~rece ived public testimony apposed to the arcade, including petitions signed by one- hundred twenty-five persons. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council dur irg the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in parag ra phs'1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the pu rpo ses of the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed use will be detrimental to the public h.,, ~,., 'f ^ty, xe :far^ •icria'ly nju .,..., properties or improvements in the vicinity;~and (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 7 D CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. CUP 89-19 - ARCADE September 20, 1989 Page 3 (d) That the proposed use is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby reverses the action of the Planning Commis lion specified in Recital (ii) above and denies the application. 1 1 "( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Henry Murakosh, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and Ii for the proposetl Nilson Avenue Street Improvements from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue and adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RECglENOATIOM• It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Envtronmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed Wilson Avenue Street improvements and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACK6ROIMD/AINLYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Nilson Avenue Street improvements between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality pct and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements, Said improvements generally entail the asphalt concrete overlay, north side curb and gutter, replacing catch basins, etc. It is Lhe Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed protect will nat create a significant adverse impact an the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. /Re/sp~ectf • submitted, C ~H.C ~~ ~~ ,pa \/~ f Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~9- ~ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONI£NTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED WILSON AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM AMETHYST STREET TO ARCHIBIILD AVENUE WHEP.EAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available Input concerning the proposed Wilson Avenue Street Improvements; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Envi romm!n a ssessment initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Nilson Avenue Street Improvements. SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to a fornla Environmental Quality Act. 5/ c.~.ira -~` ~~~~' ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW z, '`~ '-~'- APPLICATION - ~ ` INITIAL STUDY -PART I ;.,-- GENERAL For all pr aj ec is r_qu firing environmental review, :his form rust Se Como letzd and submitted to the Development Review Committee ihro ugh :he dzo artment where the project aoplica?ion i5 made. Upon receipt of this aoplicalion, the Fanning Divis idn 5t aff gill prepare part II of the Initial Study and ma'rte rocanmenoat ions to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations; (1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (?) The prro jzct will 'nave a significant environmental impact and an Environmental :rp ac? Report sill be prepared, or (?) An additional information report should be supplied Sy the applicant giving further information concerning the preps sed project. Da L= Filed ?r of ect Titl=: Wilson Avenue Street Improvements Applicant's yam=, address, Telephone; City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Concerning thisTProj ect: Henry Mu ra koshi, Associate Civil Engineer, (7t p) 989-1862 location of ?roj ect:Wilson Avenue from Amethyst Street to Archibald Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency isSLing such permits: ~~ PRO.IEtT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed project: work to be done consists of, in general, A,C. overlay, A.C. reconstruction along with curb 8 gutter (south side) east entl, new curb and gutter (north side) east end, and relocation of catch basins. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proDOSed buildings, if any: Nona Describe the environmental settin of the project site including information on topography, so~T slab ity, pants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): Wilson is a "secondary" paved road serving the residential community. Tract home develooment accounts for all of the imoro ved sections of the street. A S.C.E. substation and a single dwellin_u front the only unimproved section reducing westbound lane width from 32' to 9'. The entire south side is boa rdered by a 6' block wall with residences. An equestrian trail seoa ra tes the wall and the curb. The north side is intersected 6y two residential streets providing access Lo homes There are only two homes with direct access on Wilson Avenue. Une home built at the turn of the century has 5e ve ral lar a eucalyptus trees and f rnn is Wilson Avenue. This home is a designated local landmark. i.hr KluSinnn infvrtier; t.inn wan wi i5nn, n,ne ;nnm„a 'n,ac cinot~a l;v,<, [s the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental Impact '~ J MILL TNiS PROJECT: YES '.0 _. ,'°_3!? a Sah5t3nt131 change in 3rn0nd SO ntpUrS? __ _~ ?• ^•~'~? 3 SU7St an ti 3i charge i0 exiS:ing ^p iSe pf prOdUCe r~~ra,:on or glare? % :. ~^eat=_ a su 75tant+. al char ce in demand for municipal services ;police, fi re, water, sewage, etc.;? _ X 1, neat=_ changes in th e exi5: ing ?cning or ;eneral ?:an desi gn atipns? _ % >. Remove any =_xisting trees' 4pw many? 12 % _ 6. ~rea*.=_ the need far us=_ or disposal of potentially bazar dpus materi dls sucn as toxic substances, "amma6les or =_xp los ives? _ ~ Explanation of any YES answers above ;attach additional sheets if necessary): Tlie trees close proximity to the new cu r6 and gutter and driveway at 9600 Wi lSan Avenue may result in its death - due to root damage 7. Estimate the 3mou nt of sewage and solid waste materials this project gill generate gaily: ?. -5?imato the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required far this project, in cubic yards: 10. If the project involves Che construction of residential units, co~ilete the farm on the nett page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in ine attached exhibits present the data and information required for this in~t'31 evaluation to the best of my agility, and that the facts, statements, and tnf ormation presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and 'nnlief. i further pndar<tand That. uid itinnai information may ha required Ln Se subm;lted before an adequate evaluation can be made by Che Planning 7lvision, Case: `/ (~•-~'S' Signature Title Associate Civil Engineer 5~f ~` RESiOENTIAI CON STRNLTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district far accommodating the increased number of students prtor to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Location of Project PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE a TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: Z. Number of multiple family units: _ 3. Oate proposed to begin construction: ___ _. 4. Earliest date of occupancy: _ Model/ and 1 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range )~ CITY Oy AA.4CR0 CL'CA.YCNGA PART II - INISIAL SE'OY ENVTAOh"'~NTAL CRECI:LI ST DATE A.°PLI C:.:7: City of Rancho Cucamonga F:L_;G 5ATE: LOG NL~AER: PROJECT: Wilson Aven ie Imoroyement5 PROJECT LOCATION: f~nm Amefhvct to Archibald I. E\'VIRO :'?ENTAL IMPACTS (Exp lanarion of all "yes" and "maybi' artssrera ara tequirad on attached sheets). YES YAY9E NO 1. So its and Oeo cagy. ufll the proposal have s.gnia cant resin cs Sn: a. Cns tab le ground condielons or !n change in geoid gic rslaclonsh Lpa? ~ e __ X b. Disru~c Iona, diap laceman cs, comps[ [ion or c. Change Sn copograpr~ or ground aurfaca contour intervela? _,_ ~, d. The do [ruction, covering ar mod ifitarLOn of any unique geo login or physical feocuraa? _ ~ •. My pmreatial intrust in wind mr eater erosion et toils, at Cac cing •ithee on or of! cite condieona? _ g f. CAanges !n •ro slan siltaclon, or deposition? ~ X g. Cxpmun o! people c proper:: to gaoioaic hazards such as ear Mquakea, landsl idea, mud- slides, ground Ca pure, or almllar hasarda'. _ K h. M increase in th• ra ca of ea craetlon and/or use of any aineral resource? .. ~ ,(, 2. Hyd rc to xv, Will the proposal have signif Scant resu.es in: S~ E~ .`!i?3. a. Changes is curzanzs, or the course of direct San of flowing streams, r3vera, oz epheaeral stream channels? % b. Changes Sn absorp cion rates, drainage patterns, or the rata and amount of aurfac• vacer runoff' % c. Al cata[SOna co cha courf• or floe of flood vacera? X d. Chang• in the amount of surface voter In any body of voter? % e. Discharge loco surface waters, oz any alceratlon of outface vacer quality? X f. Al ce ra don of gzaundva ter tharacteriacica? __ ~ g. Change in the quart city of groundvaurs, elchef througn direct addltlona or vlch- dravala, or ch rough in urfeunc• with an aquifer? Quell ty? Qwnutr? _ X h. The reduction in the amount of vacer och+r- vise available for public vacer auppllas? _ X 1. Exposure of pwple or property to voter rel aced hazards such as flooding or aeiches? _ -Y.. 3. Air Quallcy. Vill the proposal have efgn Lticant or al Cl in: a. Cam cant or per !odic air glsaions from mobile OT SfldlteCL eOYiCea? X ScaCianary aouzeea? ~- b. Decerforaelon of tedf lene air quality iod/or Sptarfsrsnes_vieh the attainment of apDlica6l• dr gwlit~ standards? _ ~ X t. Nten cion o[ local or regional cllma clc eondltions, affecting air movement, mo iscuze or ump•racure? ~ 4. 9L^ca r'^ra, a'ia the proposal have signif icanc results Ln: a. Change Sn [he characteristics of spec lea, Intl ud l^; divers ley, dlstributlon, or numb sr of any species of plants? ~ - _ ~ b. Reduce log of the numbers of env unique, race ar eodange red sp ec Ses ai plants? ~ ~ _ X ~ ~~ „-~ - _ c. Inc zoducclon of nw or disrupt SVe speclea of plants Sneo an area? ~ d. Reduction in the potential for agricul coral produc cion? z nouns. Gill the propoaal have signif Scant raeulcs In: a. Change in the eharactarla tics <f ape<Sea, Including diversity, diatr l6ucion, or numbers of any spec!es of animals? X b. Redo<cion of the n~mbsrs of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ~ c. Inczoduc cion of nw or disrup Give apaciaa of ancauls In co an area, or result Sn a barrier to the aigraclon or movement of aniaula? ~ d. Decor ioracion or removal of existing fish or wildlife ha62cac? _ ~ 5. Poouiarlon. W121 cha proposal have algnSflcanc resuics in: a. ':ill the propoaal alter ehe tocacfon, diacrl- 6ucian, dons Sty, diversity, or grouch rata of the human population of an area? ~ b, uill the propoesl of lecc exiecEng housing, or creaee a demand for additional howing? K 6. Soc ia-Economic Futons. Will cha propaul have s iguiicanc ruules Sa: a. Change in local os reglonel aocio-economic charaeasietiee, Including economic or commercial dlversi ty, tax rau, and propercq values? X b, will protect eoete be aqui:ab ly dla eribuced ooog project benef SCiariee, i.e., buyers, tax payers or pro~ue ours? _ ~ 7. Land 1•s• and Pl ann ln¢ Cana tderaciona. utll eh• P~opasal have signlf :cane tunics in' a. A aubecancial aloe ra cion of the present or planned land use of an area? K b. A conf licc with any dos Sgnar ions, o6~ect ivu , pollUes, or adopted plans o! any governmental entitles? X c. M 1=pact upon the qu la Sty or qua nc Sty of ex iscing con su :pclve or mm~-COnsunDtLve reereacional oppocnlnlt Sea? z jrb - - 3j2 vL'j ~~V 8. :rananortacion. V111 the propoaal have signlf Scant reaulb in: a. Generation of subatantlal addl:lonal vehicular movement? X b. Effec ca an existing streets, or demand .'or neu scnec conacruccion? _- ~ c. EfEetro an ells ang parking fat £liciaa, or demand for -ev pa rking? _- ~ d. Subs cantlal Smpact upon exiscinq cranaporta- [San systems? X e. Alce ra bona to pnaene patterns of circula- tion oz movement of people and/ar goods? X f. Alceraciona [o or affects on present and po ten clal vacar-borne, rail, meat crsnaic or air traffic? X g. Inczeaaea Sn [raEC1e hazarda eo motor vehicles, 6lcycliaca or pedes criaoa? X 9. Cultural Resources. V111 the propoaal have ngm acaac results in: a. q dis curbance to the Sncegricy o£ archaeological, pal ~....w iv gi~ai, and%Or nlacori cal rtlau ttta? __ ~ 10. Hea1:h, Safecv~ and Nuisance Faecors. Vill the pre posal have algniPlcane reaul ca in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X b. Ezposura at ptopla co po uncial hulth hazarda? _ ~ c. A rdak of asp lot Son or release of hazardous aukatanua Sn zhe avant aC an accident? _ ~_ X d• M increase in the numb ar of individuals or epecfes of vac tar ar paehenogea is organisms or the exposure of people co such organisms? X e. Increase in existing noise levels? _ __ ~ f. Exposure oC people to po cenclally dangerous noise levels? _ _ 7i g• The cr ea clon of ab]ec clonab to odors' X h. M increase in light or glare? 59 - - -~ Y°_~ ~.~ oc 11. Ara cheLSca. Will cha proposal have algnif SCan~ results ln: a. iha obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or v1rv? % b. The c-easion of an aeachacltally offena lv aiu? ~ c. A conflict vlch cha abl ac tlve of du lgnated or pocan cial scenic corridors? ~, 12. Ucil lcles and Public Sarvtcaa. Will chs proposal have a signdflcanc nsad for new eyaceme, ar alterations co cha following: a. Electric povez? % h. Natural or packaged gas? % c. Coe>ounicationa systems? % d. Wa err supply.' ~ ~ •. Waseevaur faci11c1ea? ~ f. Flood toncrol structures? % g. Solid vac ce facilitlas? % h. Fire pre cecc ion? _ X i. Police pro cecclon? ~ A J. Schools? _ z k. Parks or ochsc racreacional tae ilicias? % 1. Ma intenamee of pub llc [ae111t1n, ine luding roads and flood control fac111eies? ~ m. Other govatnman cal sarvicu? _ ~ 17. Ene rgy and Scares Aesourc ea. WSIl the proposal haw sign if !cant nwLts an: a. i~aa of aubscanc!al or t.c eaa!ce fuel or energy? + b. Su6scancial increase Sn demand upon ex iscing sou rtes of energy? X c. M increase Sn the demand for dove to pmenc of nev sources of energy? _ ~ d. 0.n Increase ar parp ecuu ion o[ the consumpc Son of non-renevable fo r_a of energy, vhen fear Sble renevable eouress of anargy are aval lab le? _ x ~b ~3 ~ Y:S :AY3~ VO •. Substanclal d•pL Lion of any nonreneva6l• ar eetzea natural naoura•? X 14, Mandacorv FSnd lnaa of 51¢n1flcanc •. a. Does cha pro¢e[ have ch• podncial to d•{rode ch• gwlicy a[ cha anvirmnmt, •ubseancially reduc• eha hab itu of fish or vildllta apadu, taus. a fish or vildllta popula elon to drop bQov self w•calnin{ lw•la. ehraaun eo •liminaca a plant or animal coaaauaity, reduc• eha number or restrict cM rang a[ a sera or andan{•nd plant or animal os allminau Smporeanc uamplss o[ eha em]er Darioda of California hie eory or prahiaeorq? _ X b. Doea cha projate have the Dountlal to sehlava short-term, co ch• diaadvancaje of ion{-ucm, •nvironmencal {owls? (A short-uem impact on cha anviramanr L one which oeeusa in • [elacivaly brief, dat1n1t1va period of eiu while len{- term impacts will •nduu wall Snco eha futon). _ ~_ X c. Oou cha prof sec have impacts which arm Individually limited, but emaulatlvely eonafdarabla? (Cumulac lvdy eomidera63a means chat eha leerapncal effects of as individual project an considerable when vlawd in connection with the effects of past projects, and probab la Future proj edes). _ % d. Doea cha proj wt have snvlronwncal afteeta which will cauu wb^unclal adverse etfeen on human being, richer directly oT Sodfnecly? % II. DISCUSSION Of L111Z10MO111TA1 LVALUATION (1.e., of attirmacive answn co ch• above qusac lone plus a discussion et OrapeNd ai tipcion meaauna). W 2 a.e . IZ:. 7ETER.YINATION On cS• bat is of thla ini cial waluac ion: i Z find the DroDOSad DroJ act COULD NOT have a signif icanc effect g', an the environmene, and a GATEGORI CAL EXEMPTION will be prepared. I find chat al [hough the proyossd proJeec could have • significant J eifecc an the environment, chars will not he a aignif icanr cif etc in ;his ease because the mitigation measures des<rib ad on an attached shut have bean added to chs proj etc. A NEGASriT_ DEO:.UNTION GILL BE PREPARED. C I find cha proposed prof act NAY have a algnificanc of fecc on the ~ envirnmanc, and an EWIAON:ffN2 L9PACT REPORT Sa required. Date ~_ ~o. yq ,!.~(' ~G` r~<~~ 5lgna cure Associate Civil Engineer TS Cle ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September nc0, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Drad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUB,IEC T: COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCE STANDARDS e~3 . I. RECOMMENDATION: This report is a matter of information only for the Council. No action is necessary; however, should the Council have any concerns, the item may be pulled for discussion. II. BACKGROUND: Upon recommendation of their Trails Advisory Committee, the Planning Commission took action on August 23 to approve a new standard for fencing along Communf ty Trails. The new standard is a two-rail, white PVC fence that stands 4'2" high at the post cap. The previous standard was a three-rail fence of 4'6". This now standard is based upon the fence design on the trails surrounding Heritage Park. The Commission indicated that three-rail fencing should still be nd rFn nn Gnnr inn nulA •:n nM a,...... a ^~... ... Also, sta ff nu ndersta nds ~+that Council's di~rec tion is to use~three- rail fencing where public safety issues are involved, such as at elementary schools (i.e. - Windrows School). The attached Planning Commission staff report fully describes the new standard and the reasons therefor. Re u11y s 8 ted, Bra 8 le City anne Ail ~r~r ~'vn Attachments: August 23, 1989 Planning Commission Staff Re Po rt ~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPUBT DATE: August 23, 1989 TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner DY: Dan Coleman, Fr inc ipal Flanner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCE STANDARDS I. RECOMMENDATION: The Trails Advisory Committee, at their meeting of August 16, reconmended that the Planning Commission modify the standard from a three-rail to a two-rail PVC fence, with essentially the same height. [. ANALYSIS: The Committee indicated that the existing two-rail fences located on the Community Trails around Heritage Park reflected the desired standard. The City's current standard calls for a three-rail PVC fence (see Exhibit "B") that is 4'6" in height. The two-rail fences at Heritage Park are 4'2" in height (see Exhibit "A"). The fallowing factors were considered by the Trails Advisory Cuu.niflee iu naniny iiiia re~unmentiatim~. 1. Two-rail fences adequately contain the horses, assuming a 4'2" height. 2. Two-rail fences provide better sight-line visibility at intersections. 3, Two-rail fences provide better visibility of landscaping behind the fences and create a less "wa 11 ed•in" appearance. 4. Two-rail fences would reduce material and labor costs. III. COMMISSION ACTION REQUESTED: The Commission should review the pro vo sed rodiffca tion, and, if acc eptabie, approve by minute action, Y~ PLANNING LOIRIISSION STAFF REPORT RE: COMMUNITY TRAIL FENCE STANDARDS August 23, 1589 Page 2 Res ully i ed B City P nner BB:DC :ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Proposed Fence Standard Exhibit "B" - Existing Fence Standard V 9'R~t~'n . PVC FENCE E`~ERT POST --_ POST CAP ~ a' ~ 5xS rvC POST ~ rx~ we w~ i ~ , i NOTES: _ ~~ I x `' TRAIL ~ COINIIIR fSFA FENCE w t,~a mar r j ~ y~ o~nnrtEC Tmruros nwE. ' i- FM6N CRAOE 1 I? t xcarmm auMrt[~ NORTF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ~~ ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALE: PYC TFNCE POST CAP ~MR~Y POS~T~____~~ ~ Li~ ~ I b I bl ~ I I~ TRAIL I elua« sT~ 5xY PVC POSE Yxr Pvc FOIE NO~T~EyS: A~ ryO 1' p051S A NCAT~ Oi OOIECTION AA[ A[ TO IE WIIN CONOIIETE _ M NNiJ11 iaY~ (~ {•tI ~I4~L~IVlJIiav~ M ~M~' ~. All Roan/ i~wr K ~ TCIIC[ ~µ~~Fy~7 TEIEII ERATE FENCE -IIAd! SIIAIL ~C OIOENIED pl TO'MAWS TRUL puac .' :~ t oceowmm wNnE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ~~ Nf R ITE1[: TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALE: Guf~P~'"~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer eY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT AwarJ the Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb Improvement Protect, located on the west side of Etiwanda, north of Victoria Street (Alternate Bl, to Bay District Paving, Inc., for the amount of 527,742.10, to be funded with Beautification funds Account No. 21-4647-8822 (FY 88/89 and 89/90) RECONENDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted award the contract for Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb Improvement Pro (Alternative B) to the lowest responsible bidder, Bay District Pa Inc., for the amount of 527,742.10. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 6, 1989, for the subJect pro,{ect. Bay District Paving Inc., 15 tho annaro~t inwect. rocnnncihle bidder with a bid amount of f27.742.10 (see attached bid summary 1. The Engineer's estimate was 524,234.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and to accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respec submitted, RH Attachment cc: Purchasing ~d ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ro~ W II5 ~~~ gig: ~~~ ~9 g k ~y. E 8 8 ~ ~ x ~: ~m ~~ ~~ ~i °:~ 8 r~rmv nc n ~ u~r.~n ~t r~ n ~anw.r n .~~ STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Linda Beek, Jr, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at the ~ intersections of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street and '; Archibald and Lemon Avenues, to Hovey Electric for the amount of f192,177.00, to be funded with SB 325 Fund ', Account Numbers 12-4631-4911 and 12-4637-8912 respectively, (FY 89/90) ~ RECONIEIDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Ccuncil accept ail bids as submitted and award the contract for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at the intersections of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street and Archibald and Lemon Avenues, to the lowest responsible bidder, Hovey Electric, for the amount of (192,177.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 6, 1989, for the sub,iect project. Hovey Electric is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of (192,177.00 (see attached bid summary 1. The Engineer's estimate was f170,000.00, Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respe y ubmitted, /,, C RHM. B:s~ Attachment cc: Purchasing /~ 8 3 y ~ W Y o~ 8 8 b ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ! _~~ s € Y 3 3 Q 8 ~~g d G ~ b ~ S "~ a ~I ~ 7/ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 LY T0: City Council and City Manager ~-~C FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Release of Agreement for Postponement of CCBR's for Tract 13248, located an the south side of Highland Avenue, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancelation of Agreement for Tract 13248 authorizing the Ma0'or and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. Background/Analysis On September 21, 1988, the City Council entered into an agreement for the postponement of CCLR's for Tract 13248. CC&R's have been approved by the City Attorney for H 8 S Cap1W1 Enterori ses; the buyer of Tract 1374A, and rarnrdaA nn Fahruary 73 1980 document No. 89-063161, Official Records of San Bernardino County, California. The recording of the CC6R's meets all conditions of the Agreement entered on September 21, 1988. Respectfull submitted; i~ R :NV:sd Attachment 7a- RESOLUTION N0. ~~(•~ l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CCBR'S FOR TRACT I3248 YIHEREAS, to meet the requirements, as a prerequisite to approval of building permits for Tract 13248, the subdivider of said tract, H a S Capital Enterprises, entered into an Agreement for Postponement of CCAR's; and NHEREAS, said requirements have been met by the recordation of CCAR's, document No. 89-063161 recorded in San Bernardino County, California, and the current devetoDer, H 6 S Capital Enterprises, Submitted a Revocation, Release, Satisfaction and Cancelation of Agreement for approval and execution by said City. NOM, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said agreement be and the same approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City an4 the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. 73 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract Civil Engineer SDBJECT: Acceptance of Offer of Dedication for Street Purposes, offered as Boston Place (27 feet widel, a north/south street located east of Milliken Avenue on the south side of Jersey Boulevard RECDMIEMDIITIDN: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the 27-foot Offer of Dedication on Boston Place and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause save to record. Background/Analysis The developer for Parcel Map 11891, located on the south side of Arrow Route at Milliken Avenue, has requested that the City accept the dedication of Boston Place as offer on an Easement Deed recorded in the County of San Bernardino on September 25, 1984, in order to construct a portion of the street. A portion of Boston Place, from the centerline of Boston Place east, will be paved along with the full street improvements on the west half of the street for the development of Parcel Map 11891. This will allow for better two-way traffic flow. Respectfull submitted, RHM:LE . Attachment 7~f RESOLUTION N0. v l- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING A 27-FOOT DEDICATION ON BOSTON PLACE AS OFFERED FOR STREET, HIGHNAY AND RELATED PURPOSES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section is The offer to dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of LaTTfornfa, the property herein described for Street, Highway and related purposes, is hereby accepted. Said property is described as follows: That portion of the easement as offered to dedicate W the City of Rancho Cucamonga per easement deed as recorded on September 25, 1904, as instrument No. 84-23033 O.R., Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, as shown as Jersey Boulevard on Parcel Map 8648 as Der map recorded in Parcel Map Book 97, pages R1 and 86, records of said County. Section 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a cerfiFie~ copy of this resolution to be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. ~v ~ C/L ARROW ROUTE ra 1 :.n. w•• ra is rc~ IZ -a 11 ra to ra • a.w• nw a.a•• w a.a~ w a.m u• a.pl a•• rc~ Z !.M AO ra. 11 •.4 M• ra 3 a.we ns rcr_ 1 a ra 1 ~ a.a• •e• lean w rc~ ~ ~ I.wl ,w rct ie a.•n ee• ra s rct i s rct ~o PCL 7 I.ao r ~.MI M• a,q ~ i a.en •a• rct 17 i rc~ 6 a.•o •p i _ _ I.nl /p i /r : i rc~ • / ~j ~ I rcl rl ra tt •du ,•• ~ I haM O•• Ii.W 1•• L rcl 2t rCL Z3 ` a.al• r• 1•.•P ••• ~ ~jE~01CAR iOfJ e PARCEL r~N Iigy ~~ --- CITI' OF' RANCHO CL'CAMONGA ``/ ~~cn,HOticp STAFF REPORT >p j \~~' L ~ F z J4~~E~~, ~_ T. Z_ Date: September 20, 1989 - ~ _ •in =•• To: Mayor, Members of City Council, and Cit Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager~j 4.,}L By: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator ~ Subject: Offer Of Grant Deed To State Of California For A Portion Of West Beryl Park RECOMMENDATION' City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an offer of a Grant Deed identified as California Department of Transportation No. 8946 granting a portion of West Beryl Park to the State of California and adopt the attached Resolution approving the transfer. BACRGROUND• At the March 15, 1989 City Council meeting, staff presented a report in which the State of California Department of .. _i ~. .. ~ ~. ... . C pv....... •~v.... Freeway corridor for use by the City in the construction of West Heryl Park. In consideration for providing the soil, the City would provide the States a small portion of the West Beryl Park for a future off ramp at Carnelian. The concept was approved by Council and a permit has been provided by the Department of Transportation for removal of tha dirt. To conclude the agreement, the City Council is requested to execute the Grant Deed for the property requested by the State. Respectfy,lly submitted: Toe Schultz ~ '~ Community serdices Manager JS:DL:bs 77 RESOLUTION NO. 89-7~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GRANT DEED NO. 8946 TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEEDING A PORTION OF WEST BERYL PARR TO THE STATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California on March l5, 1989 approved the transfer of a portion of West Beryl Park to the Stata of California Department of Transportation for alignment of a proposed Foothill Freeway off ramp at Carnelian Street: and WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Transportation agrees to allow the City to remove +~- 20,000 cubic yards of soil Prom t2ie proposed Foothill Freeway R-O-W fcr use by the City in construction of West Beryl Park; NOW, THEP.EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dose hereby grant to the State of California the Grant Deed No. 8946. 7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector ~I SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 2 for the Traffic Signals at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue and authorize the transfer of funds in the amount of (2,938.00 from TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4037-8903 into TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4631-8708 It is recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 2 for the Traffic Signals at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Naven Avenue and the fund transfer in the amount pf 12,938.00 from TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4037-8903 into TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4637-8708 Background/Analysis After contract award, construction of Traffic Signals at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue was delayed due to extended plan reviews by Cal trans. Substantial chances were incorporated into the plans and specifications thereby resulting claims by the Contractor due to the changes in material specifications. Respect y submitted, ~/ /~~/ Attachment 79 - --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and CT ty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY; Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer ~' SUBJECT: Approves to open escrow with Andrew Ba nnakian for transfer of i remnant right-of-way along Base Line Road west of Etlwanda Avenue ~! and authorize the City Engineer to execute all necessary documents. RECOMEMDIITION: ~I Recommend approval of Resolution to open escrow with Andrew Barmakian for the transfer of remnant right-of-way at 12796 Base Line Road, APN 227-521-65 and to authorize the City Engineer to execute escrow documents on behalf of the City. Escrow fees of up to f1, 500.00 will be paid from the sale proceeds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Engineering Design Staff met with a representative of the Barmakian Company to discuss the forthcoming City pro,{ect to widen Base Line Road between Victoria Park lane and Interstate 15 and the inclusion of a remnant right-of-way parcei into an adtacent development pro,{ect proposed by the Ba rmakian Company. It was mutually agreed that the Ci tv would cell rn> .bm.,,.,. „~.,4. _~ .._.. par~ei ac 1L/90 ease Line Road for a price based on an appraisal prepared~by an independent appraiser. The mutually acceptable result is the above recommendation plus the City participating in normal closing costs. Additionally, permission is hereby sought to allow the City Engineer to execute and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City. Respec tf su fitted, f-~ RHM:JLMipa ~~ (~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~' ~ I 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED TO THE BARMAKIAN COMPANY A. RECITALS: 1. Heretofore, this Council purchased a substandard lot and improvements then known as 12796 Base LT ne Road for street ri aht-of-way purposes, at fair market value, on April 20, 1988; 2. As an integral part of Lhts transaction, an independent appraisal was made to determine what, if any, value could be established for the remnant portion of the acquired lot, which has been established as f7 ,500.00; 3. The 8armakian Company, as a condition of development of an adjacent parcel, was conditioned to acquire and incorporate the remnant portion into the development project; 4. The Barmakian Company is now requesting that such transaction be concluded so that development of the adjacent parcel may proceed. B. RESOLUTION: NON, THEREFORE, be it found, deteimined and resolved by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. All facts stated in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, hereby aro fnunA to ha truo and rnrrorY 2. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Grant Deed describing the real property described in Exhibit A, thereby transferring title of such property from the City of Rancho Cucamonga to The Barmakian Company through an Escrow transaction, fees therefore being paid from the proceeds of the purchase. 3. The Cfty Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution. U/ I 1 ~ Z ~~ ivN+~ 521-65 ~ REMIIANT - i PcG;:EE $$ T F 1 '~___~~ LOT Ib a iz m' N y ~ n~ -~t---SASE - ~;ME - r- •, CfTI' OF f(,\NCttO Cl'C;\,\IONGA `. _ "''~{~' = EtiGINEERING ~I\'I51(1N = E i ~ivn " w titlr; I~LCL FI / \ N page EXHIBIT "A" THE LAND REFERRED TO IS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFIXINIA. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLONS: That portion of Lot 15, Block "J" of the Etiwanda Colony Lands, according to plat as shown in Book 2 of Maps page 24, records of San Bernardino County described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Lot 15, said corner being 651.89 feet Nesterly along the Southerly line of Lot 16 in sa1A Block uJ" from the Southeasterly corner of said Lot 16• thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot 15, 87.83 feet; thence Nesterly parallel to Lhe Southerly line of Lot 15, 72.00 feet; thence Southerly parallel to the Easterly line of said Lot 15; 97.83 feet to the Southerly tine of said Lot 15; thence Easterly 72.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 15, to the point of beginning. EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 27.00 FEET THEREOF. -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ._~, DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~, BY: John L. Martin, Assoc i,ate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Recommend approval to open escrow with Luis P. Mora, et. al., and ', Loveland Baptist Church and Christian Center and First Baptist '~ Church of North Fontana, a California Corporation, fee purchase of ~~~ land at 13096 and 13053 Base Line Road, respectively W obtain the right-of-way for the Base Line Road Widening Project between Victoria Park Lane and Interstate 15 for 518,300.00 and E9,500.00 respectively, plus escrow costs of E5,000.00 W be paid from Systems Development Fees Account No. 22-4637-8730-4606-4117 RirfY~F1~LTTfW Recommend approval to open escrow with Luis P. Mora, et. al., and Loveland Baptist Church and Christian Center and First Baptist Church of North Fontana, a California Corporation, for purchase of land at 13096 and 13053 Base Ltne Road, respectively W obtain the right-of-way for the Base Line Road Widening Protect between Victoria Park Lane and Interstate IS for 518,300.00 and 89,500.00 respectively, plus escrow costs of E5,+10G.00 to be paid from Systems Development Fees Acceunt No. 22-4637-8730-4606-4117 and authorize the City Engineer W execute escrow documents on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND/AIULY5I5: The Engineering Oesfgn Staff met with Luis P. Mora, et. al., and Loveland Baptist Church and Christian Center and First Baptist Church of North Fontana, a Cal ifornla Corporation, to discuss the forthcoming City project to widen Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Interstate 15. It was mutually agreed that the City would purchase their property (land and improvements) for a purchase price based on an appraisal prepared by ~an independent appraisal consultant. The mutually acceptable result is the above recommendation plus the City absorbtng normal clcsi ng costs. CinrP ?nP Ciiv inninaPr nv uPCni ui'i nn is mi'nnri vad M ar root rnP doriiraiinn ___ -. ..___ _.._.., ._ ___.._. .___ __ ____r. _.._ ___.--.. _.. on behalf of the City, permission is sought hereby to also allow the City Engineer to execute and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City. R espec tfyljy submitted, .. ~~ ~k j ~ t~~./,~---z------~- RHM ~.JCM-ya~' ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Nannette ehaumik, Assistant Landscape Designer SUBJECT: Approval Lo Order District No. 7 and and 2 for Tract No of 24th Street, San Sevaine Street County the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 13565-I thru -4, located on the north side between Nardman Bullock Road and submitted by Standard Pacific of Orange RECOMENDATION: It is recommended that Lhe City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Naintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract No. 13565-1 thru -4, BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Nos. 13565-1 thru 13565-4, located on the north side of 24th Street between Nardman Bullock Road and San Sevaf ne Street was recorded under the County and subsequently annexed to the City. As all developments are annexed into the appropriate landscaping and lighting distracts at the time _< <,_ "~ ~ "YY~ ~ ~J ~ I.l IYLL I,Vi• •JJVJ-1 LI II V 1JUU J-Y 1,111 VC annexed into Landscaped Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respe ubmitted, ~ r :NB: y Attachments G ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~_ ~~ L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NOS. 13565-1 THRU 13565-4 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously foneed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act cf 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFO0.E, THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That ihis legislative boc(y hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown Tn Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B` attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including ~t~ el ry of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~W ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IANDSCAPE~ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 n ~ 1B .l \ z9 ~ /L 1R /~ 30 `' 23 3/ 91 12 32 7J / j5 ~ ~ 20 Z I2 /9 3 43 ~ /8 a ./4 /7 5 37 /U U ~ ~ ,~ , ,8 ~ , M B ,~ Ya 2 ,ro 3.7 /0 / //~ 3 ,gyp /2 I l ~ ~ /3 ~ 4 ~/ i. Z .~ L a' 42 l ~J ~ iv / 8 1 / ~% 9 / L~ _ .. LEGEND MiO,AN m E°""",•" T""• TRACT 13555. ~ GITY MAINTAINED Af/fAS ~ STAGt[ ~trt ~` cy, ~M title; f CITY OF RAPJCHO CUCAI~IONGA ~7;~.r~ 1 F{ ` iz E:N(;INEERING DIVISION ~`IT ~~~•> VICINITY ~1AP 1 \ pagt nn ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTG2ICT NO. 7 9 '> .. 1 ~1 1 1 ``1 ~, 11 I .~ , y` +9 \ ~e ', 17~ /s \ /S o~` ""0~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhSONGA "'~`' ~; + `~\~ A 'EXHIBIT A" ~. ? , n /7?'%i~ ~; F~ ~~ vi !> page Irn - LEGEND M~OUN ~ EO""'""" T""" TRACT 13565 CITY MAIN TA,NED AgE9S A S~0.Ct[ 'n1f@ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 9 7 i g I !0 5 /D BP~e ' 12 ~ 3 // y z /1 ~ 1/ 13 e --~' y /3 1a 14 1 15 /4 ~.J 1G /3 /g /G ~ 19 24 17 LEGEND MFO~AN ~] `°`Tw"°'"~" TRACT 13565 ® CITY MAINTNNEO e.gEec I___ ~ sTACR t~1t11 o" ""` ~ CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA "`I`' ~;~`~\'y ~ 'EXHIBIT A• c`: 7x~ h :c 4< <> o~a~ un EXlIIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: Tract 13565-1 thru -4 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 132 d(u N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 132 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. SBOOL -"-~SIIDt---`-Zb~QiJO- 1 --- 16 --- --- --- 2 49 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. Street Name 7 MMD Easement Perimeter Alta Dena Court Annandale Court Bradbury May San Marino May C1alremont~Lane Crescent May Covina Place Glendora Drive Hastings Ranch Rd. Ridgeline Place San Dimas Lane Turf Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. NOTE: (York progra~ areas to be annexed at future dates.) JAA: 9/20/B9 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager I FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ~~ Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ~~ and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 89-07, located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and !, Helms Avenue, submitted by Albert N. Davies RECOMIENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving MDR 89-07, accepting the sub,iect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND MDR 89-07, located an the southeast corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue, in the General Industrial District Subarea 3, was approved by the Planning Commission on Aoril 12. 1989. The Developer, Albert W. Dawes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in Lhe following amounts: Faithful Performance 9ond: 259,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 529,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater District. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. ._ i-, R~ WV:J ` Attac men is ~>/ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~- ~ ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIWONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEN N0. 89-07 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on September 20, 1989, by Albert N. Davies as developer, for Lhe improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Mt nor Development Review No. 89-07; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 9~ RESOLUTION N0. g~- ~~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNERATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MINOR DEYELOPMENT REVIEN 89-07 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district ou rs cant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972`, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the `Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proDe~y alas shown ~in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including'~ie T of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~j3 .A. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ueaa . . ~.. snrtrr~ ucurs ~ sracer nrrn --- smrar ntca ..ra ' aixrx araar i ° n HO au nu t» t [ ~ u _... NlLW_AYlN EE ii - °°Y o [A ~ Mq! M1NVt , t F(Ilgl 1WL[VM° ME1 p.Y (LIgaG AYa[t) / FA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ,' _,:~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA MDIZB9-07 ~ ~~, NfNTN 8TR[!T El(FIIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: MDR 89-07 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 3.82 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 1.64 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed District No. ~---56TJ6~--~3'SDISC - z, 27,SOO I --- --- '-- --- --- 6 3 -- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. Street Name 3 Feron Doutevard Helms Avenue Ninth Street Turf Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea. --- --- 32 JAA: 9120/89 ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPQRT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: r -. I Approval improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering ~ the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No, 3 and Street '~ Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 87-48, located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue, submitted by Sebastiano Fil pi ~ RECOMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DR 81-48, accepting the sub,iect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND OR 87-48, located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue, in the General Industrial District Subarea 3, was approved by the Planning Comm ssion on June 23. igRA fn. ihn a+,,;~+nn na o oa ,.. into I lot. -'"' "' -"" -""' The 6eveloper, Sebastiano Filpi, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the fallowing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;6,100.00 Labor and Material Bond: ;3,050.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. VpCnpfl4i,li~) • Ti 44~A '/~ ~ z z- T HMWY•.JAA3d._~ ~---, Rents Lj/_ RESOLUTION N0. U~-~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEM N0. 87-48 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on September 20, 1989, by Sebasti ano FTl pi as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described Tn said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is tc be done in con,junctTon with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 87-48; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RESOLUTION N0. ~~_ ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87-48 NHEREAS, the City Council of the CTty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1977." authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance DTstric t; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, ail of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed wtth the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper shown-in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including~e levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. C7 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 i~ EA/5T/N6 :-RB ( ue/IE9 ' -305- '~ ~~NiMPn STREET •.td0"~~~ ~m~ 5`kEEf LIGNf 4 II J:.~ -`USCJnG _URB{GJTIEA ~~ - 5 ., 3TS.TD ~ 35~ S4 l~ ALK _ __a ____-_ ' 9k] 1 995 N/Nfti STPEET ~ ~ ~ j ~ APN-L09-091-'2 W W a ~~ i~ V T \ \, i ~I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r- DRf37-9B STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT 'B' PRDJECT NAME: OR 87-48 ND, OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 2.86 acres ND. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 5.72 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps to be Annexed Districi No. Tt ,DDS 27,5UU I -° -_' --' --- --- 6 1 --- --- --- ___ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. Street Name 3 9th Street Turf Ground Cover Trees Sa. ft. So. ft. Ea. --- --- 5 ~eq; oi~n ioo ~~ ------ C[TY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~- DATE: September 20, 1989 I' T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~', 9Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector~C SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 10771, located on the south side of Mil son Avenue between Ca nistel Avenue and Deer Creek, submitted by Grigsby Development RECOMIEIpATION It is recommended that the CTty Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 10771 were approved by the City Council on August 6, 1987, in the following amounts. c,; .~.v.u o~.a.....,.,.e u„en. tie rnn Labor and Material Bond: f38,000 The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office, Respec tf itted, Attachments i RHM:SMG. ` V/ 'Grigsby Development, Inc. Bd80 UTICA AVENUE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91130 • I]i d198]-d303 August 28, 1989 Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 10771 Dear Steve: At this time, we are working to complete all the improvements prescribed in the Smprovement agreement between Grigsby Oevelopmeni and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the above-referenced projec[. Presently, the majority of the curb and gutter is Sn place and we anticipate paving the streets (first lSft) within the next month or two. We do not know at thSs time when the second lift will be applied because we will _ mA C..... 1 .l.i l Ilia to suggest thatythe extension be granted for one year~to allow adequate time for the improvements to b¢.complp ted after the construction activity has been completed. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Scott Murphy Director of Planning and Administration Attach: Improvement Agreement Extensions ~v a RESOLUTION N0. 8 ( - ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10771 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 20, 1989, by Grigsby Development as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Nilson Avenue between Canistel Avenue and Deer Creek; and NHEREAS, the instaitati on of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 10771; and NHEREAS, said tmprovement Agreement Extenst on is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. /0 3 - ------ CITY OF RANCHO CL`CA:IIONGA -z=i,~•.. STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer I BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks lnspec toy ~~~ '~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13273, '~, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain ' View Orive, submitted by Mestern Properties IIECOMMENa11TI0N It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13273 were approved by the City Council on September 22, 1988, in the following amounts, Faithful Performance Bond: 5482,000 Labor and Material Bond: =241,000 The developer, Nestern Properties, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respecl~submi tted, / ~ ~. _1! - ~--^-~`---° ~` RHMiSMG:sd~ ~, Attachments '~ ~ Lewis Homes Management Corp. I I SF Sorth titountain Ave nuc / P.O. Bur 670 ~ Cpland, Culi fumia 91'95 'I499 S09'I FAX'. 714,98;-9799 August 2, 1989 Mr. Monte Prescher City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Improvement Agreement for Tract 13277 Dear Monte: In response to your letter of July 28, 1989 indicating that the above referenced agreement is about to expire, we are hereby requesting an extension. Work will be completed around September 21, 1989 except the signalization of Milliken and Foothill which has to clear CalTrans before work can start. Six months should provide enough time to complete all of the improvements. Enclosed is the Improvement Agreement Extension form completed in triplicate and notarized, along with our check for $251.00 for the extension fee. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, (~ Donald M. Thompso~ Project Manager DMT:sd /n~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~- ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13273 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 20, 1989, by Western Properties as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-wdy adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13273; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. /~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA STAFF REPORT ~- DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ii BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspecto~~~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13541, located on Sierra Vista Street between Camino Sur and Red H111 Country Club Drive, submitted by Allmark, Inc. RECDMIEMDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13543 were approved by the City CounciY on September 8, 1988, in the following amounts. ca/~h£ul ~nnfn.~nanro Yn nA• <O1 nnn Labor and Material Bond: f40,500 The developer, Allmark, Inc., is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Re spe- ly sub fitted, RHM;SMG: m Attachments /~ Real Estate Investments Construction Proper?y Management /~LLMAf~K a August 2E, 1989 Allmark,lnc, City of Rancho Cucamonga Community uevei opment Uept. Engine=_ring Division P.O. IIcx 807 Rancho Cucamcuya, CA 91730 M L-.: Monte PCeSCher Public Works Engineer Re: Tract 13541 Dear Sir: Please constder this letter our Cormal request Eor a 180 day extension of the ?mprovement Agreement on the above referenced teact. t have encl rsed roPies of punch lists dated 12/15/HR an~i %/il/R9 a:ong with signed, notorized Extension Agreements and a check far s2si.oo A5 you are aware, the homes on the lots are being constructed by Pridemark Homes. The final punch list items will be completed by Piidernark prior to tbe'expiration of our reyuesE ed extension. ~~~ If you nave any questions, please do not hesitate to contact rt,e, 'i ou/~/~ D w:ght Anthony M1ze V :.ce President JAM/tn enclosures ALL89FH.LTR ~S Tid~fx~~~ ®~NUv~~isr /rte wrw /~~ T~~" °%o Q,,~Z~ey qT ~arrp~ad or= ~~ s ~mtr-v Vie{ /`~ p,~/ ~ ~~+/ Pao!]. /1 /,~'Ydo ' 7C 70 Arrow Route • Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91 730 • 171 a ?897556 Fax 17141 94t 4468 RESOLUTION N0. ~ 4. 4 ~-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CYTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13541 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 20, 1989, by Allmark, Inc, as developer, for tho improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Sierra Vista Street between Caini no Sur and Red Hill Country Club Drive; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the devei opment of said Tract 13541; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. - CITY OF RANCHG CL'C'ANONGA 5TAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~' BY: Steve M, Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector `~~.. I SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMME1~11TIpl: ~- ;~ The required street improvements for Tract Nos. 12525 and 12741 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amounts of 59,050 and ;10,100, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amounts of ;90,500 and f107,000, Background/Analysis Tract Nos. 12525 and 12741 - located on the west side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Highway and 26th Street DEVELOPER: Spirit Development 4 Uooer Newport Plaza. Suite 101 Newport Beach, CA 92660 TR 12525 TR 12741 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bonds (Streetl ; 4,050 E 10,700 Faithful Performance Bonds !Street) 590,500 ;107,000 Respe ylly~s muted, i ~ far ,. i.-.'-L... ~ ~. ~ - RHM:SM_G~~~ . Attachment /ID RESOLUTION N0. ~~- L~~.g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12525 AND 12741 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract Nos. 12525 and 12741 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. / ~/ - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks inspector~.a+ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: r- ~~~ `. The required street improvements for Tract 11549-1 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. The Faithful Performance Bond has also been in effect during the required one-year maintenance period and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Therefore, it is also reconended that the City Clerk be authorized to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5189,000. Background/Analysis Tract 11549-1 - located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit Avenue and Highland Avenue DEYELOPER: Lewis Homes P.0. Box 807 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f189,000 Respectful submitted, ~~~ i J /' ~'~ /~~ ~~ RHM:SMGad ~~/ Attachment 1/4 RESOLUTION N0. ~`~/_ i v.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 11549-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING CF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements fcr Tract 11549-1 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector~~j i SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ~ RECOMEIWITIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 12643 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f11 ,800 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Cierk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f118,000. Background/Analysis Tract 12643 - located on the south side of Netherlands View Loop at Calico Peak Place and Antler Peak Caurt. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 9090 fontnrv Pa rl; Fact Les Angeles, CA 90067 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) (11,800 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5118,000 Respec submitted, r _-- _ ~_ RH~'-511fi-dTF! Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~- ~~d A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORMIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12643 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12643 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector ~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13556 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 612,800 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notlce of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 3128,000. Background/Analysis Tract 13556 - located on the east side of Sierra Crest Vier Loop at Mt. Harvard Court and Mt. Cambridge Court. DEYELOPER: Marlborough Development 2029 Century Peak East Los Angeles, CA 90067 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 612,800 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 6128,000 Respect s bmitted, r ;/ /~ ~~~/ RHM:SMG~dTw Attachment I~~ RESOLUTION N0. X ~1_ ~~ l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13556 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13556 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be fileA, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,- DATE: September 20, 1909 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspec to~~ ~' I SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ~, RECOMMENNATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13560 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f6,500 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the anrount of 565,000. Background/Analysis Tract 1356U - located on the west side of Netherlands View Loop at Mt. Sterling Court and Mt. Lassen Court. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 2029 Century Park East Inc Angeles; f.A 90067 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f6,500 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S65,000 Respectf liy submitted, RRFi'-SOktdYw Attachment ~ ~ O RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ~3~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13560 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13560 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is au thorl ze4 to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~`1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Yorks Inspector~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12940 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recomaended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of E8,350 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (83,500. Background/Analysis Tract 12940 - located on the east and west side of Nillview Loop at Santiago Peak Court. DEVELOPER: Kaufman and Broad 3607 inland Fmni ra Rmil ova rd Yr110 Ontario, CA 91164 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 18,350 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 583,500 Respec ubmitted, _- RHM\SMG : di wi" Attachment ( ~ RESOLUTION N~,'-F3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12940 AND AUTNORIZ ING THE FILING Of A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12940 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. l a~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice df Completion RECOMMEI®ATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 12937 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f12,560.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f125,600.00. Background/Analysis Tract 12931 - located on the east side and west side of Hillview Loop at Mt. Ranier Court and Mt. Hood Court DEVELOPER: Kaufman 8 Broad 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-110 Ontario, CA 91764 Aaept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 12,560.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Streeti f125,600.00 Respectf ubmltted, L ~--.1-'t_~i~ RHM:SMG:sd / Attachment l ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~9- ~,J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS fOR TRACT 12937 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12931 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~ a3 - C1TX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks InsPector~- SUBdECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMiENDATION: I The required street improvements for Tract 12942 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 59,400.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 594,000.00. Background/Analysis Tract 12942 - located on the north side and south side of Hiliview Loop at Teton Peak Court and Pinnacle Peak Court DEVELOPER: Kaufman b Broad '1fi09 In1anA Fmni ra Rnniava rA Suito f._110 Ontario, CA 91764 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 9,400.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f94,000.00 Resp y s hmitted, .% _.~i ~ ~ ~-- -- RHMSMG:sd~~- Attachment /r~?" RESOLUTION N0. V~~ ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12942 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12942 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. l_ _. ~ - ~-/-~ ~S - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto SUBJECT: Release of Bands and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Tract 12941 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of (7,600 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f76,000. Background/Analysis Tract 12941 - located on the east and west side of Terrace Vf ew Loop at Pyramid Peak Court. DEVELOPER: Kaufman and Broad 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard NC110 Ontario, CA 91764 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f7,600 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) (76,000 Re spec submitted, c ._'~~ RH i~~. snG: d Attachment /~ RESOLUTION N0. V~_ ~~r n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12941 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12941 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to 6e filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ..~ ~~ j C~ - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gi1lTland, Public Norks InspectFr_ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion i RECONEIDATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 12642 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 510,800 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f108,000. Background/Analysis Tract 12642 - located on the east and west side of Terrace Yfew Loop at Mt, Abbot Court and Mt. Johnson Court. DEVELOPER: Kaufman and Broad 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard MC110 Ontario, CA 91764 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond iStreet) f10 ,800 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f108,000 Respec tf y submitted, RH •SMG:dIw Attachment /~ O RESOLUTION N0. 8 1- ~,~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12642 ANG AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12642 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFDRE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the Ctty Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. i /~ ---- - CITY OF RANCHO CCi'AMONOA STAFF REPORT r- OATE: September 20, 1989 ~t,~ T0: City Council and City Manager J ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto `~~ ~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMIEMDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12935 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f7, 180.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (77,800.00. Background/Analysis Tract 12935 - located on the east side and Nest side of Terrace View Loop at Mt. Nallace Court DEVELOPER: Kaufman b Braad t ~` J ..i t~ :I~ :firy vui.., v~ .. .. Ontario,~CA 91164 u Accept; Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 7,780.00 Release: faithful Performance Bond (Street) 577,800.00 Respec ubmitted, I ~ RHM: FMi'sd~ Attachment l,~o RESOLUTION N0. ~ r' y3g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRACT 12935 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12935 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Ci•;y Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~/ ~ I ~ . _. -_...1 /~~l n,mv nc, naurvn rrrr nnrnwrr_n STAFF REPORT ~~ 0AT E: Se otember 20, 1989 T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CASH DEPOSIT i RECOMMENDATION: Work for the fcllowing tracts has been completed. Cash deposits are hereby recommended by the Planning Division to be released to: AMOUNT OF TRACT N0. DEPOSIT PURPOSE DEVELOPER 12621 $2,500.00 Model Home Sales Macleod Office Development 11734 $2,500.00 Model Home Sales Lewis Homes Of fire 13057 $2,500.00 Model Home Sales The Fieldstone Office Company Respec tf lly submitt , Orad Buller City Planner BB au /~a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '. DATE: September 20, 1989 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Ii I FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner '~ BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner ~~ SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIuNATE THE DEMENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE, 9686 HILLSIDE RD., RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A LANDMARK A PN: 1061-561-03 I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Cauntil designate the Demens-Tolstoy House, along with the garden, as a landmark. !Exhibit "A"). II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the Comniss ion at the request of the co-trustee of the property, Peter Tolstoy, who wants to protect the house and garden with landmark designation. The hcuse one of the most interesting, AisLincLive, and impressive huild ings in the City, and Lhe families that have lived in it have been important to the development of the Citv. The attached March 2. 1989 Staff Reoo rt contains a detailed description of the architecture and of the significance of the Demens-Tolstoy families. The entire corner is presently a Point of Historic Interest, having been so designated in 1982. However, Point of Historic I r.te rest designation is for recognition purposes only; alterations do not require Historic Preservation Commission approval. There was some question about Lhe exact boundaries of the landmark, resulting in the hearing being continued and the exact boundaries being decided at the September 7, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission meeting. The reconmendat ion far designation, however, was made at the June 1, 1989 meeting. 'he devastating fire of July 21, 1989 came after the Historic Preservation Commission had made its recomne nd ation for landmark status. The recommendation was based on the historical and architectural significance of the house and that significance remains. /33 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT O EM ENS-TOES TOY HOUSE LANDMARK PROPOSAL September 20, i989 Page 2 III. REQUESTED ACTION: Staff believes that landmark designation is still well deserved because the building remains important both historically and architecturally. Landmark status will help to ensure that restoration/rehabilitation is done in a wav that is faithful to the original. Staff requests that the City Council approve the attached resolution and designate the Demens-Tolstoy lio use as a landmark. Respectfully submitted, B rau 'r`/ City Planner 88:AB:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" Staff Report and Minutes of March 2, 1989, April 6, 1989, May 4, 1989 and June 1, 1989 Staff Report and Minutes of September i, 1989 Resolutions /~ 1, ~ 1 ~~ _ ~'~ b1 III ~~ ~ ~., o ~ ,'.- w I ~,:~If 6 i ~ 1 N '~ `"~~~'~ 3 //~ E>Rhtln~ 4.2 ~l ~~ inl~l~ ~''i t ~-~~,~ ~ ~ ~ i o a~a ~ of ~ I, ~~ ~ _ a ~ fl '~• .~ei III ~~ .:::`~-:185 s . . .. . . . . ,. Zd~VOM)1VgqIJ y ~'~L `. \ ` ~- ^ '~ly~~i ` r ~, `. .. .. '.. .,to ,de,QF,b! nieo:~; `~ ~- II ILI'1 ~ ~h~ 'F' ~bi c :.. ~ ... .. ~ ~ :: ' ... ~.. ~. rG r~/~ • ~„--r-rug c +-~C ~.-:•+-.+e.~-ice _ -, _ <q.R Or)i/! JfrR. ~ ,~ ~F-l T -`-_~ r,,a.'ec,~ i~l _~~--655 G ~ ~ o Designated Area: .89 Acres Dimensions: 210' ± north-south 185' ± east-west t /\ NORTH C..'Y OF ~, ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:DEMENS•TOLSTOY LANDMAI Nlstorlc Preservation Commission / ~S EXHIBIT:_~ SCALE: 111 = 8f o. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~cnnro STAFF REPORT ~?~°' ~`_ YI I 1J Z ~ F GATE: March 2, 1989 ~ t~ ~-~I T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Comm scion cpnM; Larry Henderson. Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE DEMENS-TO LSTOY HOUSE, 9686 HILLSIDE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS A LANDMARK APN: 1061-56-03 I. BACKGROUND: This proposal was brought to the Commission by Peter o s oy w o owns the property. The house is already a designated Point of Historic Interest; the family wants to protect the house with landnark designation before it is sold. The house had been on a 12 acre parcel which was recently subdivided. It is expected that there will be new houses built on the adjacent land, formerly joined to this property. The request is to designate only the house itself, the garden around the house and a few rows of citrus and vines, as shown on I the attached map. a~. J~1. OI.I VII OIIV VC ]1.I Ir/41VII. A. Location: The house stands on a 3.16 acre lot located at L'ne northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Hillside Road, set back approximately 175 feet from Hillside, and 125 feet from Archibald. 8. Site land Use; Zoning, and General Plan Designation: The site is the location of a single family residence, garden, a small vineyard and several rows of citrus. It is zoned and designated for very low density residential use (under 2 dwelling units per acre). C. Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, and General Plan Desiynation: 'L"' 'JaCart; '-^d gild u'eii y"rid teu' Very Luw DenSi Ly Residential, under 2~dwelling units per acre. South: Vacant; zoned and designated Very Low Density Residential, under 2 dwelling units per acre. HISTORIC PRESERVAT! COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - DEMEn~-TOLSiOY HOUSE LANDMARK March 2, 1989 Page 2 East: Single Family Residences; zoned and designated Very Low Density Residential, under 2 dwelling units par acre. West: Vacant; zoned and designated Very Low Density Residential, under 2 dwelling units oer acre. Description: The Demons-Tolstoy House is an imposing Queen nne lc orian building with massive walls of native stone and an exuberant complex of towers, porches, dormers, gables and chimneys on and around its hipped roof. The house faces Hillside Road but the garden design and entry are oriented toward the southeast corner of the property. It is set off by a small vineyard, a few rows of citrus, and a terraced garden. The house calls attention to itself because of its size and the unusual combination of material (natural rock) and style (Queen Annel. Among the features that stand out are two large towers that flank the front facade, half-timbered gables with small-paned lights in the windows, the striking texture and craftsmanship of the rockwork, and the placement of windows Just under the roofline. fie house 1s at once sophisticated and rustic. The two towers balance the front facade, but the house escapes an uncharacteristic (for Queen Anne Victorian) symmetry by means of an off-center flight of stairs which marks the main entry. The feeling of assymetry is reinforced by the n ui6 mein my n.leM ah Mn of the na ndnn The interior is commodious. The house has two stories above a g roundlevel basement which contains a number of storage rooms, a guest room, a workshop, and a large playroom. The main floor contains an entry hall with a stairway leading to the second floor, a large living-dining room which once was two separate rooms, a kitchen at the rear with an adjoining porch and pantries, and a wide hall off of which are bedrooms and baths. Ceilings are about 10 feet high. The second story has several more bedrooms, baths and sleeping porches It has the feel of a house made for a large lively Victorian family. There are interesting nooks and crannies and surprises throughout, such as a lTvingroom pocket door that slides vertically into a slot in the floor, and a study wall that cif rivy i.n rav eai the adini ninn Lladrnnm,,, M~rh, of the info rinr trim is redwood (now painted white), and the floors are oak. The garden fs terraced, with each section defined by rock dividers. A small working vineyard 11es to the south of the house, and citrus trees are to the east and west. /3~ HISTORIC PRESERVATI COMA SSI ON STAFF REPORT - DEMEn~-TOLSTOY HOUSE LANDMARK March 2, 1989 Page 3 III. Analysis: A. Historical Background: The house was built around 1890 6y a Mr. Green, cousin of the Ch affey brothers, according to the application form. Mr. Green's bride did not want Ln live in what was then Ferro sa; he sold it in 1991 to a Russian immlgran t, Captain Peter Demens (Piotr Demetieff). Captain Demens was at that time looking for a vacation house and ranch. Several scholars have published matertal about this colorful man. Demens was an energetic entepreneur who, according to The Hfstory of Alta Loma 1880-1980, had been a captain in 't>e zar s mperla uar a ore leaving Russia because of dissatisfaction with the government. He came to the United States in 1880 and settled in Florida with his wife and four children. An article in the July, 1977 issue of The Quarterly Journal of the Library of ron9ress, entitled "Pe ert eme~ns, , e e ou a e us efl-r -feTTs the saga of Oemens's unsuccessful foray into railroad building in Florida. The story of his Florida adventures is told in greater detail in a book, Full Steam Ahead! The Story of Peter Demens, Founder of St. Pe ers urg, or a y er arry~, F~ The Library of Congress article discusses his numerous contributions to Russian publications describing life in the Ilnf•nA G1a~en nil alts l: Gn :e rata,.....:. ~~.~ ....~.~•..~ ta_ virtues and made him look good, too. He told of his many successful business schemes in Southern California as a bank shareholder, owner of steam laundries and sawmills, and partner in numerous other enterprises. He wrote in one of these ,journals that in 1894 he managed to "satisfy the inborn tendency of every Russian - to settle on the land." He is referring to purchase of his ranch in. femosa. He and his expanding family spent some of their holidays and summers on the ranch before moving there permanently in 1912, Captain Demens 1s reported to have been especially influential in bringing the Pacific Electric Railway along a northerly rnu EN, rnnveni en} tp tha ri tri1c grny o<, iannn~ne rg nnnnii tti ng from the railway participated to a plan 1n which they assessed themselves to acquire the right-of-way. According to Peter Tolstoy, Demens put up his own money to pay for the shares of those landowners who did not participate in the plan. Demens also may have used his influence with the Huntington family to convince the Paclflc Electric Company to swing to the north. I a~ HISTORIC PRESERVATI COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - DEMEna-TOLSTOY HOUSE LANDMARK March 2, 1984 Page 4 Also, according to Peter Tolstoy, Demens chose the name Alta Loma for the new train depot, which the other partners agreed to. Demens was a citrus man of importance, serving on the board of the first Docking house in Alta Loma and as President of the Cucamonga Citrus Fruit Grower's Association, and later building his own packing house north of the tracks west of Amethyst. Demens died in 1919, his wife, in 1922. Their daughter Inna lived in the house until her death in the early 1940's. The second daughter, Vera, and her husband Andrey Tolstoy, also Russian, then came to live foil time on the ranch. Andrey was a technical director for MGM and the house was host to many parties with Hollywood friends. A close friend and frequent guest was Yul Brynner; an upstairs bedroom with a beautiful sleigh bed is called the Yul Brynner room. B. Significance: Architectural: The house is significant architecturally. It is one of the most striking and interesting houses in the city. Examples of Queen Anne architecture can be found throughout the United States, but few are constructed of uncut native round stones. ThP }M r4noee nF •6P mal to Po{APnh {n }HP N11~ anA openings, their height, ands the large diameter of the towers bring a sense of mass, weight, and permanence to the building. The contrasting wood porches and dormers with their various shaped roofs enliven it. According to Peter Tolstoy, the glass in the house comes from China, and the wood from the Lake Arrowhead area. Historical and Cultural: The house also has historical significance because it was the home of Peter Demens and family an outstanding, colorful, and important part of Alta Loma's history, and later to Vora and Andrey and son Peter Tolstoy, artistic and talented people and well known members of the community. L. \uM\: iRll lp It WOII I Ii hP pPP{prahlP }p dp[1gnT tP LhP Pn}1 PP 316 acres, the owner's request is only to designate the house, garden, and a few rows of citrus and vines because the property inay be further subdivided. Future development should be sensitive to this unique environment and preserve as much of the context as possible. ~3~ HISTORIC PRESERVATI COMA SSION STAFF REPORT - DEMEno-TOLSTOY HOUSE LANDMARK March 2, 1989 Page 5 D. Environmental Assessment: Landmark designations are exempt from CEQA under Article 19 Sec. 15308. IV. Facts for Findings: The Demens Tolstoy House meets the criteria in 'Secfion~. 4-090-of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. A, Histor;cal and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, and way of life. 2. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned and important. 3. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that is now rare. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The construction materials used in the proposed lanOnark are unusual, and uniquely effective. 2, The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, its detatis and materiais are beautiful and unusual, C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark ma teria7ly benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed lan6nark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood and community. , V. Correspondence: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report, no ce-tom sew to homeowners wi thi n 300 feet, and scus~ s oT if ave taken place between staff and the owner, Staff has toured the property. 'vi_ worn mnanda ii, nn• Cta:i ro:~yAnnnwc that the iii gr~ri_ Ore~n.~~y ti On omm ss on recommend to the City Council approval of designation of the oemens-Tolstoy House as a Landmark as shown on Exhibit "A". Mr. Tolstoy may wish to request alternative boundaries, and therefore ask fora continuance of the Public Hearing. / ~/~ HI SiORIC PRE5ERVATI COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - DEMEha-TOLSTOY HOUSE LANDMARK March 2, 1989 Page 6 Staff further recommends that the Historical Preservation Commission recommend the following conditions to be attached to any future tract map at the time the parcel is divf ded: 1) Oeed restrictions must iimit the houses to the immediate south and east to one story. 2) The architecture should be compatible and restrained. 3) There must be sensitivity to grading issues to the south and east to keep the Demens Tolstoy House visible. 41 Landscaping to the south and east should not block the view of the Demens-Tolstoy House. 5) As much of the context as fs feasible must be maintained. 6) The deeds to property to the south and east should contain property owner acknowledgement that there may be a law-impact adaptive reuse of the Tolstoy-Oemens House. Respectfully submitted, ~~'~:~ Larry Henderson N ~,, DL nnnw BB: LH:AB:,15 Attachments: Site Map Application Photographs Resolutions / ~// CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting March 2, 1989 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Cali Fornia, Chairman Schmidt then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Melicent Arner, Marsha Banks, Gene Billings, Bob Schmidt, COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: Ada Cooper, Alan Haskvitz STAFF PRESENT: Larry Henderson, Senior Pi anner; Arlene Banks, Associate Planner; Kelly Orta, Secretary. APPR04AL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Banks, seconded by Billings, carried to approve the minutes of February 2, 1989 as amended. ,r •+* A. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE DEMENS-TOLSfOY HOUSE, 9686 HILLSIDE ROAD, Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, stated that Mr, Tolstoy could not attend the meeting and that he want to build some flexibility into the dimensions of the landmark bounds rtes and therefore, he has requested a continuance to Lhe April 6, 1989 meeting. Motion; Moved by Banks, seconded by Arner, to continue the Proposal to Designate the Demens-Tolstoy House, 9686 Hillside Road as a Historic landmark to the April 6, 1989 meeting. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RAN(S, AaNER, BRLINGS, SC NMI DT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, HASKVITZ -carried HPC MINUTES ~.1- MARCH 2, 1989 C,~- CATE: April 6, 1989 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Li Gn.4/Q 1'n r~J; ~~. -` ~~. ~~' z TD: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Conmti scion FR DM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BV: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TD DESIGNATE THE DEMENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE, 9686 - - - ... ,on roue rom arc BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the March 2, 1989 meeting o ,e stork Preservation Commission to enable Peter Tolstoy, co-executor of the Tolstoy estate, to clarify the boundaries of the area to be designated as a landmark. Mr. Tolstoy is requesting tk at the Historic Preservation Commission's and City Council's Resolutions be phrased to allow flexibility in the boundaries of the designated landmark. The finai dimensions wiil be determined when (and if) the land east and south of the house is subdT Vi ded (see Exhibit "A"). Wclle ea o...b. u a ..• ...... r-~_a.,.. -... ~.__.:.._._ ..i iii different parties about the sale of the property. Mr. Tolstoy wishes to protect the house and garden with landmark designation, but intends to avoid adding a layer of approvals to subdivision of the land. However, if the property is sold to someone who wants to keep the three acres intact, Mr. Tolstoy requests that the final dimensions of the landmark be the entire property (see Exhibit "B"). This latter al to rr.a tive would be the ideal way to preserve the context of this historic structure. II. ANALYSIS: Since the move Lo designate comes at Mr. Tolstoy's requesi- and since the historic values of the property would be reasonably maintained with either alternative, the Commission should consider this request, Ah n. n mamn_ran dnm ran cunr •.. r~~..nn• o>>....: ..,. be .... ... ~,. ~..,..,. ..y Staff recommending conditions that would-~~h elp ensure compatible development should a tract map be submitted. III. CORRECTION AND UPDATE: Mr. Tolstoy was not in town during the time a e rc -s~ff' report was being prepared, and thus was not able to correct an error regarding ownership. The report said that Mr. Tolstoy is the owner of the property. The information he subsequently gave to staff is as follows: !~/3 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: DEMENS/TOLSiOY LD April 6, 1989 Page 2 We11s Fargo bank N.A. as trustee of the lkra Tolstoy Trust. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. as co-executor of the estate of Andrey Tolstoy, deceased. Peter Tolstoy as co-executor of the estate of Andrey Tolstoy, deceased. Mr. Tolstoy said that he has the authority to consent to landmark designation. Mr. Tolstoy also said that the family is interested in having a plaque placed on the house. He was given the sketch drawn by Laura Bonaccorsi, City Landscape Designer. Staff will discuss wording and placement with Mr. Tolstoy once the designation process is complete. Mr. Tolstoy indicated that the family would be willing to pay for the plaque. IY. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation ommss on recommend to the City Council approval of the designation of the Demens-Tolstoy House because 1t meets the criteria cf the Histcric Preservation Conmfssicn Ordinance, and that the exact dimensions of the designated area will be determined when a tract or parcel map is approved. Staff further recommends that the HTstorlc Preservation Commission request staff to send a memorandum to Current Planning staff to consider the following items on any future subdivision or parcel map: There should he a deed restriction limiting the height of the houses to the immediate south and east to one story. 2. The architecture of the houses in the tract should be compatible with the Demens-Tolstoy House and must be restrained, in order not to clash nor to take attention away from the landmark. 3 Th^ -h^~~ld b^ sensitivity to gradin ues the q south and yeast to keep the Demens-Tolstoy ~HOUSe visible from the street. 4, Landscaping to the south and east should not block the view of the house. 5. As much of the context as feasible shoulA be retained. /y~ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: DEMENS/TOLSTOY LD April 6, 1989 Page 3 6. The deeds to the property to the south and east should contain property owner acknowledgement that there may some day be a law-impact adaptive reuse of the Oemens- Tolstoy House. Respectful l'Iy~subm~itte~d~~ L.J. ~derson Senior Planner LJH:ko Attachments ~y~ CITY GF RANCHO CUCAh10NGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMA SSI ON MINUTES Regular Meeting April 6, 1989 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commlssicn to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Lommuni ty Center, 916k~` Base Line Road, Rancho Cucarcnga, California, Chai r;nan Schmidt then led in the pledge of all eylance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: DRESENT: Mel scent Arner, Marsha Banks, Gene Billings, Bob Schmidt, Alan Haskvitz, Ada Cooper (arrived 7:10 p.m.) STAFF PRESE(1T: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner; Pam Ledbetter, ~ Assistant Park Planner; Kelly Orta, Secretary x ~ + • + ; APPROVAL OF MINUT Motion: Moved by~Billings, seconded by Banks, abstained by Haskvl tz to approve the minutes of March 2, 1989 ~PUBLiC HEARINGS i _ n. Lnu~rv,"nn G'u's G;iniivn v">-vi iri~vEi•¢ri.i-iGL.ii u'i riuiiii - n prupuaai Lu es gna e e emens- o s oy ouse, s e oa Rancho Cucamonga, as a Landmark - APN: 1061-561-03. (Continued from March 2, 1989) Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no response, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Haskvitz stated he had difficulty visualizing how the property would be subdivided and what citrus and grapes would be left intact. Mrs. Banks stated that the map 1s approximate because the exact lines of the s ubdlviston are not known, She stated that Mr. Tolstoy wanted to have the property designated as a Landmark to protect the bu11d1na_ and as much as the Duna as possible bef ur2 ii ii iul u'. HPC MINUTES -1- APRIL 6, 1989 I ~l~ Commissioner Haskvitz stated that the view of the front and side of the house should be saved. Commissioner Banks stated that this would be difficult. She stated that once you take out the lot on Hillside shown on Exhibit "A", she would find 1t hard to keep the house visible. Commissioner Billings stated the lots on Archibald Avenue would b'i ock it also. Commissioner Banks stated that the house would not be visible if the subdivision was done according to Exhibit "A". Commissioner Arner questioned if the little piece from Hillside to the house was needed for access. Mrs. Banks stated that it was more of a view corridor to leave open so that from the southeast, you would 6e able to look in and see the house. Fie stated *h at if the Commission wanted to change the dimensions of the map, this item would need to be continued to give Mr. Tolstoy an opportunity to review. Commissioner Billings stated that both proposals eliminate the arch driveway, which is a beautiful setting to the house. He stated Exhibit "B" would Inc Judea portion of that driveway. Commissioner Haskvitz questioned how much control the Commission had. Mr;. Banks stated that if Mr. Tolstoy does not agree with the borders recommended by the Comimissi on, he would relay that to the City Council who have the power to approve the boundaries of the landmark. Commissioner Ha skvltz stated that half of the value of this house is the :. -. 'y, Commissioner Banks stated she saw eliminating one lot on Exhibit "A", either the lot dl rec tly south or the lot dl rectly southeast. Fie stated that either way there would be visibility. Fie stated she had serious doubts that the house would have any visibility with houses on either one of the lots. Motion: Nerved by Banks-, seconded by Arner to continue Landmark Designation 89-01 - The Demens-Tolstoy House, to give the applicant time to respond to the Commission's suggestion of eliminating one lot from his Exhibit "A" to provide greater visibility of the house to the May 4, 1984 meeting. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, ARNER, COOPER, SCHMIOT, BILLINGS, HA9CVTTZ !iKS' COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried HPC MINUTES -Z- APRiL 6, 1989 /y~ - CITY OF RANCHO CLCA91ONGA STAFF REPORT ~- ~; <', DATE: May 4, 1989 ~ I, T0: Ch ai nnan and Members of the Hi sta ric Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner ~I BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner ~I SUBJECT: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: A PRDPOSAL TO OE SIGNATE THE ~~, _ - - an mar es gna o-Ei n~~-0'l~ BACKGROUND: The Demens-Tolstoy House is presently a Point of isA'~c interest in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Its co-owner, Deter Tolstoy, requested designation of the house as a landmark, but wanted flexibility in the final determination of the landmark boundaries in order to be able to subdivide the vineyard and grove to the south and east without having to request a Landmark Alteration Permit. Designation would have the advantage of protecting the Integrity of the house from inappropriate changes by future owners. At the April 6, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, Commission members expressed the opinion that the setting is an imporLa ni part of Lne Slgnl Ll tome of the House and they wanted to explore options to preserve it. They continued the pu611c hearing. Deputy City Planner, Otto Kroutil, is currently working with Mr. Tolstoy to find a way to preserve as much of the setting as possible without sacrificing density. II. RECOMMENDATION: .Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation omm sL~s'~on continue the public hearing to allay Mr. Tolstoy and Mr. Kroutil sufficient time to work out a satisfactory design solution and to determine appropriate landmark boundaries, Respectfully submitted, Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko /y~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMi96I0N MINUTES Regular 'le eti ng May 4, 1989 Chairman Bob khmi dt called the Regular .Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Ni storic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 9ase line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Cali Fo rnia. Chairman khmi dt then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL rgLL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: tAelicent Arner, Marsha Banks, Gene Billings, Bob knmidt, Alan Haskvitz, Ada Cooper STAFF PRESENT: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner; Arlene Banks, Associate Planner; Kelly Orta, Secretary + • r ~ ~ APPRO YAL OF MINUTES _ ~ Motion: Moved by Banks, seconded by billings, carried to approve the m7nutes of March 2, 1989. PUBLIC HEARINGS l (~ A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE DEMENS-TOLS70Y MUUSt, 9080 HILL SIUt RUAU, HANGHU CUCAMUNGA, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 1061- { - ecommen a on o con nue o une o enable staff to ;~ work on design alternatives. Arlene 9anks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Motion: Moved by Billings, seconded by Arner to continue a Proposal to Designate the Demens-Tols toy House, 9686 Hillside Road, Rancho Cucamonga, as a Landmark to June 1, 1989. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 91LLiNGS, ARNER, SCHMiDT, COOPER, HASKViTl, BANKS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE --carried HPC MINUTES -1- MAY 4, 1989 /~/ CITY OF RANCHO CIiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,_ . ~.. DATE: June 1, 1989 T0: Chairman and Members of Lhe Historic Preservation ~'~ Commission '. FROM: I a, ry Nond 9. - , ~C.. ~.,~ O1a~iri~r 8Y: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONTiNUEO PUBLIC NEARING - A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE D M N- Y HOU H LL R RAN H UC 0 L ND K - A N: -5 -0 ii I. BACKGROUND: This item was first on the March 2, 1489 agenda. It was coot nued to allow time to explore ways to include as much as possible of the setting around the house within the boundaries of Lhe designated landmark. Staff had recommended in April to designate the landmark with the provision that the exact placement of the boundaries would 6e determined when a subdivision of the parcel is made, or when the property is sold to an owner who wishes to obtain the 3 acres, in which case the designation would be for the whole corner. Also "-"''- '" '~t ~f auyyee ieu wnu ii.iuns co oe pas sea along to currentupl anning~staff. (See attached Staff Report). II. DISCUSS ION: When the Commission considered this proposed landmark, ~a T-re ady a Point of Historic Interest), several members said that they would like to see if a larger area could be included in the designation because the setting is o' great importance to the integrity of the building. The sense of an earlier time and place would he lost if the vineyard, cf tru s, and other trees were removed. furthermore, the house could be blocked from view by future development. Commission members felt that houses built to Lhe south and west wou id be detrimental to the landmark. They felt that an ample area between the house and street was needed to retain the context. - i, u~, n.~.. v......i _, °""=" - t" ~ ~" and Peter Tuistoy iaiked aboui possible ways to^~leave Va portion of the land around the house undeveloped, either the southeast corner or the vineyard in front. However, because the 8 acres west and north of the house had already been recorded as a separate parcel and the Droperty sold, the ability to redesign around the house to allow more lots nn the 8 acres in exchange for open space to the south/southeast ~~U HISTORIC PRESERVAT' COiMISSION STAff REPORT OEMENS-TOLSTOY NOUS~ June 1, 1989 Page 2 was limited. This door is not entirely closed, however, but now that the sale has taken place, Mr Tolstoy would like to move ahead and get the house and garden designated. The Commission obviously would prefer to recommend to the Council designation of the entire corner, or at least of the house plus a goodly Perrio^ rn the seufh!sautheast. How_ver, since Mr. ro?s.oy is the originator of the request, and the request at this time is to designate the house and garden only, it appears the the Commission's real choices are between designation of the house with the garden at this point (with the door left open for the possibility of a larger area, and perhaps the entire corner being included later), or not to have the property designated as a landmark at all. The remainder of the lot could be left as a Point of Historic Interest, to enable future Commissions and Councils to know that the intention is to preserve the setting, and to help support justification of special, creative treatment of any future lots. Exhibit "R" illustrates this proposal. This designation can be thought of as a first step in a series to ensure that the house and garden will not be inapproprfately altered, and to work toward the goal of preserving as much of the context as possible. Future possibilities include designing a transfer of development rights scheme which would allow an owner to "buy density" from this parcel and allow higher density elsewhere, leaving the "donor" land undeveloped. Another possibility is to ,- - - ops~~- Syr - - ~ 60 >~~L6 a~~~ southeast tou provide for rete ntionc of ~veg elation, place the houses where they impact least on the view, and restrict walls. ??i. P.ECOMMEND ATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation ommis~s'i on approve the attached Resolution recommending to the City Council designation of the Demens-Tolstoy House and garden as a landmark, leaving the remainder of the corner parcel as a Point of Hi ;toric Interest. The boundaries, as shown on the aLt ac hed Exhibit "A", are within the north and west property lines and a line generally described as the outer edge of Lhe easterly and southerly dr ivewa,ys. Staff further recommends that staff be directed to work with the property owner toward the goal of preserving as much of the setting within the 3.16 acres as possible. /~/ HISTORIC PRESERVAT' ~ COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEMENS-TOL STOY HOUSE June 1, 1989 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, L.T f~r4as~ ~~ i3 L.J. Henderson Senior Planner LJH:m Ig Attachments: Exhibit "A" Staff Reports of March, Resolutions April and May, 1984 /5~ 1 ~ ~~~ - 1-~ ~ ~ \ '~ ~ I ~ ~ ,`~ `~ , z ~ tR~{adv. ~~, ~ ~~~ lo'# ~ ~ ~' ~ s . , ~ ,~ . {, ., h _ # .., I .,~ ?'v ..4 ~ ~, ~~ ., ~ hrv :~. ' 1 N ~ yj t i ~ . ,,.q , r . ~, wl } r~~ ~ ~~ ._ . ~ a,ll(,-, 1_ Eb ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° 1 f^ f~l~ U~ ~i4~c.,Z ,,,, ~ .,~~J ~.~ W,.~~.~ ~ ,~ ~:.. brim ~ '~ 1.t: ~ ',~ hi .L '~d I ..: " .~~ '~'~ / i ~ ~~i~~ I ~~) ~~1 1iI~ I {I lir l ~~ ~ ry~, XI ,ll ~I '• j i i ' a ~ O~ i 1 r i. ~ ~ I { t' ~ i I ~~ i ~; ~ ~ 1~~ ~1 tt I ' ~ l I N: / ' V 441 e ~ i'~~ ~ ~~'~ 1 ~ ~ 4, -I~"~ . t~ '~~ ~`,~, ~, -~ ; i~ ~ _ ~ °7 ~ ~,,,, r~' ~'7'~ ' ~ 1 }.9..'~~ ~; ~f~~ ~b.'A.' ~ i ~' ~~; , ~, ~` ...:~:..• i pf :f ..'.. :~:'. :. ~ , . ~ . ~* i I' :J. ~. fto : i .. . z z~.~.. .. . i7 ~. .. ~,,.~; _w ...._... f. .~ ~ ~ Tr I ~ / l~ (. ~. ~+~ f~~J`~. 4 ~ F ~ ~~ ~'i.~' ~ W a~:~i t ~` ARF H ~BA E-R ~': ' " ~\~ , --` ~N O'15 20 E N4',~' ~;~ _-z~~-~-~ ~ Imo' ( ~1 ~i~^-;s:n:c r i ~. I L. ~ '~~' I. ~ /S .~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMi SSION MI MITES Regular Meeting ,lu ne 1, 1989 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman St hni At then led to the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COM1I SSfONERS: PRESENT: Marsha Banks, Gene Billings, Bob Schmidt, Alan Haskvitz (arrived 7:051, Ada Cooper L OMMI SSIONE RS: ABSENT: Melf cent Arner STAFF PRESENT: Larry Henderson, Senf or Planner; Ke11y Orta, Secretary +~+.+, APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Banks, seconded by Billings, carried to approve the ml notes of May 4, 1999. + + + : i PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE DEMENS-TOLSTOY ~ - - `\ Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Peter Demons Tolstoy, 9540 Hillside Road, stated he would like to commend the staff on the diligence of their work, especially Arlene Banks, Larry Henderson, Otto KroutTl, and Brad Buller. He stated that one of the wishes oP his family is that the house be designated as a landmark. He stated that because There ~ e btC LrU5t5 and one probate, he cculd only offer Lhe 9ardan and house, and cannot offer the remaining part of the 3 acres that the house NPC MINUTES -1- ,TUNE 1, 1989 /~~ 15 situated on, He stated that the hope is that to the future, the 3 acres will be sold fifth the house and that the whole property would be designated. He stated that the citrus on the property is between 90 and 100 years old, and - is no longer viable economically since no grove services are available. He stated that the vineyard is rather new and with only one place around to crush the grapes, which makes the vineyard economically not viable. He stated that the citrus and vineyards are only viable Tn preserving the neighborhood the way the family would like it to be preserved, but unfortunately this may not he able to be worked out. He stated that he would like the Commission to declare that part of the property that he knows he can preserve at this point. He stated he had one change to the map. He stated that the east-west dimension of 2301 feet 1s actually about 2041 feet. He stated that he xould like to have the Resolution to the City Council changed also. He re-assured the Commission that the family is going to do all they can to preserve the whole 3 acres. Commissioner Cooper questioned whether there was going to be an easement so that there would be access to the house. Mr. Tolstoy responded that this will occur. Fk: stated that they want to preserve the circular drive as best as poss161e and that there will be Mo drives. Commissioner Banks questioned if the shaded area on A-4 1s accurate and ,lust the dl mans ion wrong. Mr. Tolstoy responded no, that the shaded area is also wrong. Fie stated that he would like to preserve the driveway, but that it may be lmpossl ble to preserve two rows of trees. Commissioner Banks questioned if the westerly line is moving east or the easterly line moving west, or both coming in. Mr. Tolstoy stated no. He stated that on the west, the 'driveway is approximately what they are trying to include. Commissioner Banks stated that the 200 feet would include the most easterly rrnv of trees and exclude two rows to the west. Mr. Tolstoy concurred. Commissioner Haskvltz questioned if the trees 1n that area are all 70 years old. Mr. Tolstoy responded that to the best of his knowledge, they have to be 90 years old. Fie stated he was not sure on the dates. HPC MINUTES -2- JUNE 1, 1989 /5.5 Commissioner Cooper stated that Mr. Tolstoy's grandfather signed the Cucangnga Citrus Association Book in 1896 and that Mr. Tolstoy's mother verified the signature. Commissioner Banks stated that the Commission's concern was not to acquire as much lard as possible, but to keep the view of the house open for public view. 91e stated that their concern was that the corner of Archl bald and Hillside be opened, even if it was a strip along the driveway. 91e stated she understood the problems that are occurring and that the family will continue to try to see that this comes about. But, if this cannot happen and the land that is not shaded does get developed, then the conceal becomes the development of that property and can the houses be situated and qu ali ficatl ons be put on the height of the development that they be of a nature that does not obscure the view of the house. Mr. Tol stoy stated that he can guarantee that he will do all he can to preserve the view of the house. He stated there have been several people interested in buying the property with the idea of putting houses on the four lots around the house and he stated they have re,iec ted those. He stated there is one developer interested and he is very send tine to this and when the property 7s sold, there will be a deed restriction as best as possible. He stated that the plan the developer is talking about would leave quite a corridor to the house. He stated that decisions will not be made for several months. He stated that any development on this property will be handled N1th great sensitivity. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Banks asked Larry Henderson what the process was within the City that the Commission can work with to see that their concerns are addressed. M. wenAene nn . nnAnA !ha! hhe ml anninn rmm~l eai nn vi 11 hn Well a nF If e<~_„___ _va no because 1t wi 11 still ce rry the Historic Point of Interest. He ste ted 1t will come back to the Commission with staff indicating receipt of the parcel map. Commissioner Banks questioned if the parcel map would be approved before the Historic Preservation Comm7ssion had a chance to review it. Mr. Henderson stated no.- He stated 1t would come back to the Commission as an informational item indicating that the parcel map as been received and 1t now time to re-examine how much of the site should be left as a Point of Historic Interest. Fie stated that this does not legally affect whether or not tt 1s reviewed by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Banks questioned if the Commission's concerns could be relayed to the Planning Commission so they would courteously refer it back to the iii itvr iC Pr ci2r'r ativn Commission. HPC MINUTES -3- JUNE 1, 1989 / ~~ Chairman Schmidt re-opened the public hearing. Mr. Tolstoy referred to a previous staff report and the recommendations, which would become part of the mo*.i on. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Bi lungs, seconded by Cooper, to recommend Landmark Designs Lion of the Demens-Tolstoy House, 9686 Hi llslde Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to the City Council and change the east-west dl mansion from 2301 to 2001 feet and request that if the remaining land is to be developed, that the Planning Comat ssi on refer it back to the Historic Preserrati an Commission for revl ew. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMA SSIONERS: OI LLI NGS, COOPER, BANKS, HA9(VITZ, SC HMI DT NOES: COMMI SSiONERS: NONE i ABSENT: COMdI SSI ONERS: PR NEA ~ ~_ _ --canted + + . • . NEN~BUSINESS B. PRELl MI NARY RE ViEN OF ARAIZA HOUSE, 9442 19TH STREET Larry Hendersbnt Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt oper`ed the meeting for public discussion. The property owner sta tell. that the house is built over a cellar and has also been added on onto the wholAback side of the house. ' Chairman Schmidt closed the meets for public discussion. Commissioner Banks stated that her husb is related to the Araizas and she has a name of someone that has documented'~.~he Aratza family history. She stated that the house appears to be 1920's ho She stated that she felt the Commission shoutQ pursue getting informatlon'~out the house and 1f the information leads to anything, then try to get 1t oif•.tihe agenda fora public hearing. if th~ Commission does not find out anyth else about it, or anything that-wouid inM cote that was the original Aratza House, she does not even feel that it 1s an excellent example of a Craftsman style house. M.' NP n/ln r[/In llilPf}IOOPd Th011} }IIP [l}P 1}CPIf. HPC MINUTES -4- JUNE 1, 1989 ~z~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ C DATE: September 7, 1989 T0: Chairman and Members Of The Historic Preservation Commission FR "uM: Larry Henderson, Principal ..an r,cr 6Y: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SIIBJ EC T: 80U NO ARIES OF THE OEMEN S-TOLSTOY LAIIOMARK BACKGROUND: Oes pi to the disastrous fire at the Oemens-Tolstoy House, the structure remains one of the most historically and architecturally significant buildings in the City. Staff intends to put the recommendation for landmark designation on the September 20, 1969 City Council agenda. The purpose of this staff report is to discuss the boundaries of the landmark. Rs stated in earlier staff reports, Peter Tolstoy's request is to designs to Che house and garden only. Rt the ,tune 1, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, he stated that the east-west dimension of the landmark was to be 200 feet. when Mr. Tolstoy actually drew the line on Che map later at the Planning Department ~~~_. ~~. ._-• ..--• A:...--.:..- --_n ....• •.. In •......n..:.n•~nl~. 107 feet. ,.~~.. ..~,,. ,.,... ,. ,~,,..,. ,,.,. .,.,.,. ,.,.. ... .. .. -.. ....__ .__ Rt the July 7, 1989 meeting, Che Commission was concerned about the difference between the lA2 feet (plus or minus a few feet) on the map and the 200 feet indicated at the hearing, and wanted to clarify the reasons far what appeared to 6e a change to a smaller designated area. "Staff learned in discussing the matter with Mr. Tolstoy that the reason far the discrepancy in the figures is simply that the 200 feet was an estimate Chat overshot the mark; the line drawn on the map is exactly where Mr. Tolstoy wants it Co be. The Commission's preference has been to designate as much land around the building as passible. However, the request for landmark fnnrn 4r Tnle~n., nA •FO _ <_•_ _ f_n_ _o_C_tryn.t i_e_ gii .~„~~ rc ,,. .,,....,. .... ..._ ~ ~ , the 'n ouse and garden only, Staff thinks that the landmark boundaries drawn by Mr. Tolstoy are acceptable for the following reasons: 1; Protection of the house and garden are assured. ~J HPL STAEF REPORT BOUNDARIES OEMENS-TOLSTOY LANDMARK September 7, 1989 Page 2 2) The Commission can review and comment on plans, if any are submitted, for the rest of the 3.1 acre parcel. 3) There still seems to be a good chance that the setting will be retained by future owners. The designated area shown in Exhibit A is apP rox ima tely .89 acres measuring 210 feet north-south, by 185 feet east-west. Landmark designation will require that changes to the exterior !that are different from the way it appeared prior to the fire) will be brought to the Commission for a landmark Alteration Permit. However, changes that must be made to correct unsafe or dangerous conditions are allowed without a Landmark Alteration Permit. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Nlsta ric Preservation Commission acc eDt Exhibit A as the recommended designated landmark area. Respectfully submitted, ~ O ol6_ l.G. . La Henderson Principal Planner Attachment: Exhibit "A", Designated Landmark Area /J CITY OF RAN ~OOCRU DONG AVSSr01V P RPO$eS QNL HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Y Regular Meeting September 7, 1989 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Pre servation Conmiss ion to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Schmidt then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Bob Schmidt, Ada Cooper, Steven Preston, Mel icent Arner, Alan Ha skvi tz (arrived 7:05) COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: Marsha Banks, Gene Billings STAFF PRESENT: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Arlene Banks, Associate Planner; Kelly Orta, Secretary; Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator +.+.. AP PRCVAL CF MI";UTES Motion: Flo ved by Arner. seconded by Preston, carried to ana rout the mi mites of August S, 1984 + ~ . ~ OLO BUSINESS A. OOU NO ARIES OF THE DEM EN S-TO LS TOY LANDMARK Arlene Banks, .."s soc is to Planner, presented the staff report HPC MINUTES -I- SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 / /~~/ DP2AFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Conmiss inner Preston referred to the third point of the staff report, which indicated that there still seems to be z good chance that the setting will be retained 6y future owners. He questioned what the basis for this belief was. Mrs. Banks stated that there have been people interested in purc hasin9 the property who want to retain the whole corner. Mr. Tolstoy can explain further. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Peter Tolstoy, 9540 Hillside Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the lot is one lot of 3 at res. He stated that the family would like to see the house and the 3 acres sold as one piece to help preserve the nature of the neighborhood. He stated that because of economics and other kinds of considerations, he needs to keep their options open on Lhe 3-acre parcel. He stated that they have found several people that are interested in buying the 3 acres and preserving it as one piece. He stated that in case this is not viable, they want to keep their options open, at the same time wanting to make the house and gars en parr os *.he historic zl scheme, Conmiss inner Ha skvitz questioned if there had been anv decision made on rebuilding the house. Mr, Tolstoy stated that as of at this time, they have devised a process in which the house can be replaced. He stated that there will be three phases to that process; 1) fea sibi l~i ty or discovery phase, 2) drawing of plans for the reconstruction and obtaining City's approval and 3) reconstruction itself. He stated that the first phase has already been contracted for, fommissioner Ha skvitz au estioned if the house would 6e reconstructed r ana rr{l acc of av nanca c, HPC MINUTES -2- SEPTEMBER 1. 1989 DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Tol stoy stated that as far as he knows, there is plenty of money to cover what will be required. He stated that after the feasibility/discovery phase, he may have to say that he does not know. He stated that it looks now that there is enough to cever it and to bring back the antiques and everything else that was destroyed. He stated there was one thing he would like to add. He stated that he noticed that the staff report suggests that the Commission have a look at what would happen to the 3 acres if it were not sold as piece. He ,r,. rcd he would FoYC ,.., we", the Cc, :r•iss'„•• would a's„ •~ant r„ takc u '.ook at the 8 acres around it and when the pre posal for that development comes, the Commission might want to look at that so that wil', blend in with the ambiance of the neighborhood, Chairman Schmidt closed the publ it hearing. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated that the remaining portion of the 3 acres will remain a Point of Historic Interest. He stated that the entire 3 acres and house is now a Point of Historic Interest. He stated that at Lhe first public hearing, ±he Commission made a point that they wanted tc make sure that the Pcint of Histcr is Interest stayed on the 3 ac roe sn that there was some allowance that if an opportunity presented itself to designate Lhe entire site a landmark. it could be done at a later date. Commissioner Ha skvi tz questioned the possibility of expanding this designation to the entire site. Mr, Henderson stated that Mr. Tolstoy would not support that. Commissioner Preston suggested a few th in95 the Commission want to add to Lhe motion to accept Exhibit "A". He stated that the Commission might Want to re- state for the record that the intent would be to continue to have a Point of Yi~4n nln in4n ne~4 dneVnm Hnn t~:e mdl..q 4:n~n nG •F` ~ .y.• r.~•• v.. .,u.ivu.i Vv•r v r utrc„ second, any designation of the .89 acres is not binding on the Commission with respect to any future designation of the remaining section of the property if, HPr, MIHUi ES -3- SEPTEMD ER 7, 1989 ~~~ FOR DISCUSS ON pURpOSES ONLY at some later point, the Commiss ien felt that it became necessary in order to protect the remaining portion of the property, and third, that Commission would like the retention of a view corridor from the street that protects the view of that structure. Mrs. Banks stated that Mr. Tolstoy wants to retain the view corridor. Mot i.. ~.. Ma ed by Arno, sec„nded ;,y Pre,,.,.,, ,.c reco~~:,,end ~o she ~ ty Ccuncl to accept Exhibit "A" as recommended designated landmark area of the Oemens- Tolstoy House with three additions; 1) that the remaining property continues to be a Point of Historic Interest, 2) that by designated this area as a landmark, it does not preclude designating the entire corner as a landmark in the future and, 3) to be sure that a view corridor to the house remains, no matter what happens in the development of the su rrcu nd ing area. The motion was carried by the following vote. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARN ER, PRESTON, COOPER, SC HM IDT, NASKV ITZ NOES: COMMISSI O";ERs: NONE ABSENT: LCMMISSIONERS: BANKS. BILLINGS --carried P,e spect fully su hmi tied, Kelly Or to Secretary RPC MINUTES -M1- SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 ~,~ 3 kESOLU TION N0. 89-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE IIISTOR IC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE DEM ENS-TOLSTOY HO:1SE LOCATED AT °686 HILLSIDE ROAD AS P. LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Co mni scion has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider alt comments on the proposed Landmark ,,.^.1 y,.,, ..,,. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and rev'ewed all input re ga rdirg said Landmark Designation. '~.JH EREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. "IOIJ, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Co mmiscion hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application generally applies to property located within Assessor Parcel Number 1051-551-03 as shown on Exhibit "R", an area of .89 acres measuring approximately 210 feet by 185 feet. SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the fallowing criteria established in Cha oter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cu ea monoa Munic ioal Code: ~. Historical and Cultural Significance: ine proposeo ianama r¢ is particularly representative of an historical period, type. style, region, and way of life. 2. The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned and important, 3, The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that is now rare. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The construction materials used in the oro po sed landmark are unusual, and uniquely effective. /~ y HISTORIC PR ES ERVAIIUN COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-G2 O EM ENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE Gu ne I, 1989 Page 2 2, The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is 6eauti ful, its details and materials are beautiful and unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the h ictn sir rha carter of tho n inhhn.hn„d 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visua'. feature of the neighborhood and community. SECTION RI: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA !Article !a, Sectionn iS308~ SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed Sy this Council and based on the findings set forth shove, !IOW, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Cc until does hereby approve designation of The Demens-Tolstoy House as a landmark. APPROVED AND ADOPTEG TH iS 'ST GA'( OF GUN E, 1989 G~ .fry ~ ~l / y -yrv. yri ~c-c.(/~ Bob Schmidt, Chairman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, PRESTON, SCHMIOT, COOPER, HASKVI TZ NOES: COMM ISS[ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, BILLINGS ~~~ j RESOLUI'I ON N0. V I_ y.~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE D EM ENS-TOLSTOY HOUSE LOCATED AT 9686 HILLSIDE ROAD AS A L ANCMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has heid a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation and issues Re soiuLion No. o9-OZ recouxire nd my Lu L6 io Ci Ly Cu unc it that said Landmark Designation he approved. I•lH EREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed ail input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Landmark Designation, WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The apDl icat ion generally aDPlies to property located within Assessor Parcel Number 1061-561-03 as shown on Exhibit "A", an area of .89 acres measuring approximately 210 feet by 185 feet. SECTION ii: The oro oo sed landmark mee is the fol lowinn criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, and way of life, ?, The proposed landmark was cn nnected with someone renowned and important. 3. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building that 15 now rare. D, Historic Architectural and Engineering Siynificance: The construction ma terial5 used in the orooosed landmark are unusual. and uniquely e rrective. 2, The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, its details and materials are beautiful and unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: /~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. D EMENS-TOES TOY HOUSE SEPTEMBER 2U, 1989 Page 2 I, The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood, 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood and community. SECTION Ii L• Dac;nnarinn ^f land:ra rk ._ <x e~~~pt from CEQA !nriic ie 19, Section 153- 0~- - SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Council and based on the findings set forth above, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES ULVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve designation of The Demens-Tolstoy Nou se as a landmark. /` CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT ;t DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8r: Arlene Ban kS. Associate Planner ~'i S f1BJ EC T: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CROSW ELL HOOSE, 9874 ARROW HIGHWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AS A LANDMARK - APN: 208-311-04 I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council designate the Croswell House as a Landmark, II. BACKGROUND: This item was brought to the City Councii in August, 1988, It had come to the attention of the Historic Preservation Commission because of a proposed apartment development on the site. At that time, the owner, Joh^se.^. Liao, was opposed tc designation. The Councii referred the recommendation back to the Commission for reconsideration. the Historic Preservation Commission tabled its recommendation because the building did not have nraat onnu~6 r ~+a+~,,,,.c .c warrant designation in the face of owner opposition. Since that time, the owner's architects have worked with Planning staff and the Design Review Committee on various configurations for the apartment complex. All have ncorpo ra ted the Croswell House io to the design and used details from- the house in the new huildings. When neighbors expressed concern about the prospect of an apartment complex, Mr. Liao agreed to change his application from agar tmenis to condominiums, necessitating a new application. Mr. Liao also agreed to support landmark designation. The house is a small Spanish Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival 1s~±yle building in good condition, The attached staff reports ~1.iVP IIC tT11oA An ~t wi„1:.... . y~iv~~ the II I]tll %'llell Il e1rK (IM II II (~ !1? the building. The sty ie fits in well with contemporary inte rp re to ticns of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture. Although it is a modest building, it does meet the crf ter is for landmark designation listed in the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: CROSW ELL HOUSE LD September 20, 1989 Page 2 The property appears to have changed hands; the new owners, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Liu, are agreeable to designating the building a landmark and keeping it as part of the project. iII. ACTION REpUESTED: Staff requests that the City Council approve the Resolution des ignatinp the Croswell House as a landmark because it meets the criteria in the Historic Preservation Ord ina me as stated in the attached Resolution. P.esDBC tfully ~ bm yj d, Brad Buller / City Planner BB:AB:sp Attachments: HPC Staff Reports and Minutes of August 3, 1989 with all Attachments. Resolutions / ~~ --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~- DATE: August 3, 1989 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner ~~'~ BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner I! SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CROSWELL HOUSE, 9874 ARROW ~~~ _ _ ~-- A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 89-03 FOR I. BACKGROUND: I A. City Potions: The Croswell House was originally recommended o~~e Cit-y-Council for designation as a Landmark in July of 1988. At that time, the owner, Mr. Johnson Liao, was opposed to designation. The City Council referred the recommendation back to the Cenenission saying that more information was needed showing the historical importance of the house if the Council was to justify designating the property over the objection of the owner. The Historic Preservation Commission rescinded its original recommendation, reasoning that the house is not sufficiently outstanding to justtfy designation without owner consent. Haweve r, Commission members felt strongly that the house should not be wantonly destroyed, that it does meet the criteria in the Ordinance for Local LanAnark Status, and that it should he incorporated into the proposed multi-family project. A memorandum to that effect was sent to the Planning Commission. Since that time, the project planner has been working with Mr. Liao to modify the design of the proposed project. The latest proposal includes the house; tt uses design features from the heUSe rh neughoUt the proj eCt. and is laafr in density and has more landscaping than originally proposed. The proposal was brought before the Design Review Committee on May 18, 1989, where several changes were proposed. In June, a preliminary Environmental Assessment was presented t0 the Planning Commission. The Commission heard the concerns of numerous neighbors and commented that the project would / 7c= HPC STAFF REPORT RE: CRDSWELL HOUSE LD b LAP August 3, 1989 Page 2 likely not need an Environmental impact Report if it were modified to address the ob,i ections of the neighbors. As a result, a new application for condominiums (rather than rental apartments) has been submitted. A Landmark Alteration Permit will be presented in September for changes to the lot. Historic Preservation Commission staff is attempting to make the process as smooth and easy as possible for the owner. B. Owner Action: Mr. Liao stated his willingness to have the oushe ed-sTgnated as a Landmark in a recent letter to the City. Historic Preservation staff contacted Mr. Liao on July 17, 1989. He said that he is willing to support designation as long as it does not create an obstacle to his development of the condominiums. Since his proposals all Tnclude retention of the house, staff felt that designation would not be a problem, and could be an advantage if he pursues the use of the Historical Building Code and a Mills Act agreement. II. ANALYSIS: A, Earlier Staff Re orts: The attached staff reports describe ~f ee a~nding land uses, the historical and architectural background of the house, and its ciani fT ca ncc. Pacts fnr fi nAinnc arc the camp Tn hri cf the house was lived in by Mrs. Ora Croswell, Secretary of the Cucamonga Water District for many years. It was built probably in the early 1930's, and has a touch of Spanish Mission in its architecture. Staff thinks that the house is worthy of designation because it is a good representative of this type of Spanish Eclectic architecture, it is in good condition, and has not been altered on the exterior. 1t was the home of along-standing member of the community. The house will help to make the condominium development more architecturally interesting. Environmental Assessment: Historic Preservation Commission s a a oug a an environmental determination for the ~~~h ale project had already been made by the Ptanni na Commi sston, but discovered that their review had been nre rely preliminary. It is necessary to advertise and make an environmental determination in connection with a Landnark Alteration Permit. / 7/ HPC STAFF REPORT RE: CROSMELL HOUSE LD E LAP August 3, 1989 Page 3 III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in The Daily Report and newspaper an -~noti ces were sent to the owner an o owners of property within 300 feet. Staff has talked to Mr. Liao. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation omm ssion recommend to the City Council designation of the Croswell House as a Landnark. Staff further recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission continue the Landnwrk Alteration Permit hearing to September 7, 1989 sa that a proper advertisement in the newspaper of the Environmental Assessment for this proposal can be done. Respectfully submitted, ~~~;~'~„ Larry Henderson Principal Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments - HPC Staff Report and Minutes of October 6, 1988 City Council Staff Report of August 17, 1988 HPC Staff Report and Minutes of July 7, 1988 HPC Staff Report and Minutes of June 2, 1988 Resolutions / ~~ J----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~. ~- DATE: October 6, 1988 it T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation ', Commission rROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner ', BV: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner ~', SUBJECT: RECONSSDERATION OF A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CROSWELL ' HOUSE, 9874 ARROti HIGHNAY, AS A LANDMARK OR POINT OF ~, HISTORIC INTEREST. APN: 208-311-04 '~~ I. BACKGROUND: The Croswell House, located on the north side of Arrow igA'TTietween Archibald and Hermosa, was originally brought to the attention of the Commission because of a proposed condominium development on the site. The house was on the survey list with a status of "SUS": Surveyed, Undetermined Significance. This house is a Small Spanish-Eclectic or Mediterranean style structure with a synmetrical facade and Mission-influenced parapet. It was built around 1934. It was the home of Ora C. Croswell, a secretary at the Cucamonma wa rnr rmm~a~y The Commission recommended designation of the house as a landmark to the City Council because the house is a good although modest example of Mediterranian/Spanish style architecture and because it appeared feasible for the condominium project to incorporate the house successfully and thereby create a more interesting and distinctive project. The histo ricai background, however, is not sufficient to distinguish the house as having special historical significance. Another reason far recommending designation was that there are only 25 Spanish style structures on the survey list, and many of those are on Foothill Boulevard, and face an uncertain future. II. COUNCIL AC TiONt Mhen this item. came before the Ci t'r Cimnr.ii the ~ouncii~voted to refer it back to the Commission because, lacking owner consent, they did not see that it was outstanding enough td require the owner to build around 1t, The Council also felt that the historical documentation was weak and wanted staff to see if more information could be found to justify landmark designation. ~7'~ HISTORIC PRESERYAT, ., COPM ISSION STAFF REPORT CROSNELL HOUSE October 6, 1988 Page 2 III. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL INFORMATION: In addition to the information con aloe rn e s a repor s of June 2 and July 7, staff has found that the Croswell family was in the teaming and automobile express business. A 1914 City Directory advertisement says "O.N. Croswell, Auto Transfer Teaming and Orchard Work, The Maximum of Efficiency". (See attached) Teams of horses could 6e hired to be used in the orchards. Auto transfer/express referred to transporting goods by motor vehicle. Whether Ora Croswell was a member of the family or married to a member of the family is ambiguous. The 1934 city Directory lists her as Ora C. Croswell. Early Directories often indicated if someone was a widow or included "Mrs." in the listing, but there is no indication that she is married. However, a 1951 Directory lists her as Mrs. O.C. Croswell. If this is correct, then she was married tr, a member of the family. Association with the Croswells does not seem sufficient to justify landmark designation of the house. Their name is not listed in the more accessible historical resources. It appears that they were not one of the families that influenced the development of the area, and no events of community-wide importance occurred at the house. It simply was the home of a woman who was a secretary at the local water company. 1V. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION POLICY: Mr. Johnson Liao, owner n nrnnur v c nn n avnr n ne nna4i nn Thn rnmmi- in the midst ~of wording its policy regarding designations of landmarks when the owner is opposed. The criteria are as follows (not final wording): A. Has the property been identified as having potential state and/or national register status and does it stand out as having special architectural and/or historical significance? and B. Could designation help to protect the structure? Although designation would meet criterion B because it might help to protect the Croswell House, it does not meet criterion A. The Croswell House has not been identified as having potential ate iviGr riationai 'reGi;tei itatu i. and aith0uuh if is a onod example of Spanish Eclectic/Mediterranean architecture, it does not, in staff's opinion, stand out as having special architectural significance, nor does it stand out as having special historical significance. HISTORIC DRESERVAI .N COPMISSION STAFF REPORT CROSNELL HCUSE October 6, 1988 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation omm ss on no recommend designation of the Croswell House to the City Council because, lacking owner consent, it is not outstanding enough to warrant designation. However, if the Commission wishes to retain ±he house on the survey list as a potential local landmark in the event that the Planning Commission wishes to retain or to move the house or if the condominium project is not built, staff could support such an action. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ L.J. Henderson Senior Planner LJ H: AB:mlg Attachments: Staff Reports of June 2, 1988, July 7, 1988, and August 17, 1988, with attachments. Page from 1914 Cucamonga City Dl rectory /7~ flAMONA AVE. Af~(:FIIi~AL[~ C~ 1 l• PLANNING DIVISION IT'E.~1 TITLE _`I X71 1~r2t ~'~W EXHIBIT SGIE 7~ t „ m ~ r f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V y - N ~ Z ~ i ~ - y _ n . a T 0 0 y N . 1 ~ n Z F+ '~ - - - d t+ ^ No ,'y L ~' = ~ A r w` ~ ~ r .) u ~ b N _ '-l ~ ~ J ~ A -1 z / ro y n H G r n M ~ _ L ~/ '~ - ~ h - y ... n ~- = = X ~ o 0 ~J IJ V1 T l'~ n Yu X Ci ~ Y 1 7 ~ C m = Y ~~ ~d n i~] ~ x O 1 ~a Z -• O r ~~ Z T ~~ a J o a? r= ~~ ~~ ~~ -e '~ .-. . }FF ~ ~' A. ` ' III p 'i .~ O _ ~ I .. i i ~ ~ a O ~ F-~ . rt ~ w t is M fD o iv c. G ~ ( n' W ~ ^ /TI i' ~ ~: ~~ "i K o ~ z, o ~--~ L ~ ~ O .i 'i ~ Y m G ~ ~ Q .I. ~ • ~ W ~ -r } ~ ~ l ~ .^ n n ~ ~ ~ ~ : Y ~ O '-y £ j ~ . Y ;: ~? 3 ~ Y A x ~r ~ b "5 n ~' ~: n u p ,: 1; ~ Y , ~ a ^, ~. ~a ~' 7 "„"j' @. 3 ~ ~ 0 ' ~ ~ n i' 'i J ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ;: w o . 1 R ' ' : t ^ ~' ~~r +-ri ' rrm ~'.~-' r:-Y.-f- 'rte a ~ -:-:-5 :~i^: -i ~ i ~~-;-; :- H^'..'.-{i-: ~: ~ -17 .,...,,,- ~.~...,t..~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 17, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CROSWELL HOUSE, 9874 AKRON L - I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends ~ihaE-Ehe-Et"~Council designate 9874 Arrow Highway a landmark. II. BACKGROUND: This proposal came to the attention of the Commission wirequest for a condominium project for the site. The project site is on the City's list of potential designation but was taken out of sequence because of the pending project. Currently Mr. Johnson Liao, though he continues to object to designation, is working with staff to incorporate the house into the project. Architectural 6etails from the house are being included in the architecture of the development. It is a Spanish Fclect is style house built in the early thirties. III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Commission first consi ere +s + em a s une meeting and continued it in order to look at the proposed site plan. to the meantime, Assistant Planner Cindy Norris worked with the applicant to incorporate the house into the site plan so that on July 1, 1988, the Commission- saw the plan which included the house. The Commission understood that the owner objected to designation but commended him and hfs architect for working with staff. The /~C CITY COUNCIL STAFF PORT THE CROSNELL MOUSE August 11, 1988 Page 2 Commission voted 5-U, 2 absent, to recommend designation of the house as a landmark, They also specified architectural features which they would like to see in the design of the new units. Res y submi j~ /B d Bull / Cit r BB:AB :mlg Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Reports Site Plan Resolution cc: Historic Preservation Commissf on Mr, and Mrs. Johnson Liao / 79 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Juty 7, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner ~! BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner !~~ SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE 9874 ARROM HIGHNAY A POINT OF ~~'~ -- I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the June 2, 1988 ! to st-rtc Manning Commission meeting. The Commission wanted to ~i see a site map of the proposed condominium project and to allow i time for further research on the history of the house. The maximum number of units that could fit onto the property is 44. City standards are such that the maximum number of units are by no means guaranteed on a piece of property. Quality development requires excellence in design, ample room for outdoor living, provisior, for privacy, generous landscaping, and amenities such as recreation areas. Quality development often means not building to the maximum. II. UPDATE: The week after the Historic Preservation Commission meeting, current pianm ng sca rr memoer Ctnay Horrts, Assistant Civil Engineer Betty Miller, Larry Henderson and Arlene Banks met with the owner of the property, Johnson Liao, and architect Victor Palos of Inland Design. Two proposed site plans were reviewed. Curb cuts, fire lane locations, views from the street, and various configurations for the condominiums were discussed, The major topic was whether and how the existing Spanish Eclectic/Mediterranean style house could be incorporated into the project. A new site plan was presented to staff on June 29, 1988 that leaves the house in its current location. Staff will discuss the site plan at the n~eeti ng. iii. Histur icai informs ii on: The previous owners, John and Patricia ~echsner~, ougfi~f~{he`house in 1960. The name Patti-O-Rancho came from Mrs. Oechsner's name, Patricia (Patti) plus the initial of their last name (0). They brought up their ffve children in the house, keeping cows, pigs, horses and chickens in back to give their children a taste of country life. Mr. Oechsner worked for a ~v HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 9874 ARROW HIUnNAY uulY 7, 1988 Page 2 local dairy. Previous owners were the Taylor family who owned a motel in Missouri and spent the winters in Cucamonga. The Taylors had purchased the house from the heirs of the Crosswell family, according to Mr. Oechsner. The 1934 Cucamonga City Directory shows an Ora C. Crosswell, secretary for the Cucamonga Water Company, living at 186 E. Arrow Route. Mr. Oechsner's information corroborates the City Directory, assuming that 186 E. Arrow is now 9874 Arrow. The phone directory indicates that the house was built at least by 1934 rather Lhan 1937, the date given by Mr. Oechsner. There was some discussion of the possibility that Leslie "Scoop" Faster who worked for the Cucamonga Times may have lived there, but City directories of the s an ear y 40's place him in Alta Loma. IY. ARCHITECTURE: As stated in the ,iune 2, 1988 staff report, the oust} a ruins its historical architectural features, and although loss of houses such as these may seem as small matter, as they are demolished, one by one, Rancho Cucamonga's few and fragile links with the past are lost. The City loses a bit of charm and interest and flavor. There are only 25 structures on the list identified by the survey team as pre-World Nar I1 Mediterranean/Spanish style. Many are on rau ciiiii ouuievard and race an uncer coin fu cu re, the se 2~ structures represent only 7.8% of the total number of structures on the list. Another way to look at this is to compare the number of structures of this style, most of which are single family houses, to the total number of single family houses, of which there are 23,507. The historic Mediterranean/Spanish style homes represent .iY, (one-tenth of one percent) of single family homes in the City. Because of the scarcity of this style of architecture, staff is revising its first recommendation and recommending that the house be designated a landmark. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 9874 Arrow Highway meets three of the cri erra rs e n he Ordinance. A. Historic and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style, 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of huilding which was once common but is now rare. i 5 i J HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 9874 ARRON HIGnMAY July 7, 1988 Page 3 8. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual featura of the neighborhood. (Ord. 70 59, 1919), iY. RECOIRdEN0ATI0N: Staff recommends that the Historic Pre serva ti nn ommis~ si'on recommend to the City Council designation of 9874 Arrow as a landmarY. because it is among the few good examples of a modest, 1930's Spanish-Eclectic style home in Rancho Cucamonga. Further, staff recommends that the Commission comment on integrating the house into the site plan and on how Lhe style, details, and materials of the house should be echoed in the design of the condominium protect. Respectfully submitted, .. n ~~`n~/-C~ In L ~J H ntlerson `~~~~~~ Senior Planner LH:AB:mlg Attachment: Tentative Site Dlan Revised Resolutions ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~- DATE: June 2, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner ~. OY: Arlene 8ank;, Associate Planr~er SUBJECT: POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST DESIGNATION OF 9874 ARROW ROUTE - 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: 'A~cfton- egues e a the Historic Preservation Commission recommend-to~t~e City Council the designation of 9874 Arrow Route as a Point of Historic Interest. B. Location: The house is located on the north side of Arrow ouR~,Tl24 feet west of Hernasa, across from Ramona. C. Site Land Uses -Zoning - General Plan Designation: The site contains a single family house with two garages, a small out- building and old chicken coops. The zoning is M, Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). The General Plan Designation is also Medium Density Residential. D. Ad,j scent Land Uses - Zonin -General Plan Desi nations: or - scan one um ens y e5 en to eneral Plan Designation is M, Medium Density Residential. South - Single family houses; Zoned L, Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); General Plan Designation is L, Low Density Residential. East - Small bungalow; Zoning and General Plan Designation is M, Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). west - A large lot with a large wood frame house; Zoning and General Plan Designation is M, Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). E. Description: This flat roofed Spanish Eclectic one-story house idn~ea, a nine triCdl facade with a has ~r-"' .r prominent, iow- pitched, gabled front porch, The gable is echoed on the parapet roofline above. A pair of decorative, red-tile covered shed overhangs emphasize the horizontal lines of the row of front windows which flank the front entry and are protected from the sun by awnings. Triangular vents composed of six semi-circular tiles and decorative medallions beneath the gable (~ HISTORIC PRESERVATIC STAFF REPORT RE: POI - 9874 ARROh ROUTE June 2, 1988 Page 2 peaks are embellishments that enliven the simple lines of this house. It was restuccoed with a finish that is probably rougher than the original. A circular driveway is edged with boxwood and in front of a matching garage is a trellised carport. The words "Patti-0- Rancho" are cn the nailbcx. There are nature tree; cn the property and a large Palm in front is one of several lining on the north side of Arrow. It is estimated that the City has only a handful of Spanish style structures from the late 1920's and 1930's such as this one. II. ANALYSIS: ac ~rcund: An apartment/condominium complex is proposed for s-fFi~nd adiacent land, totaling 3.25 acres. The house is on the list of potential landmarks, but no documentation has yet been done on the history of Lhis house. A Current planner brought this house to our attention. It appears similar in style to houses built on Foothill by George Klusman in the late '20's and early '30's. The house retains its historic architectural features. Although apparently it was an egg ranch, its style and the iunnai iruni ya ru uu nui have a iypiuai iy rural iuuk. B. Issues: Loss of houses such as these seem to some to be a smaTT-matter. They are not elaborate edifices, and no especially important person lived in them. But, as they are Lost, one by one, the few and fragile links to the past in this region are lost. In a City that is rapidly approaching the 100,000 population mark, the 200 to 300 pre World War II structures that are not remodeled beyond recognition become a rare and valuable resource to be cherished. Staff's position is that these yenerally scattered, generally modest huildi n9s give a bit of flavor and a touch of interest to the City; they add layers of meaning to the area and a sense of place that comes from having elements in the environment that are both old and new, that have a variety of mental associations and provide O ACII>C VI I. UIIt 111Y lty w1111 llle past. Ill ey IllaM1e a Ilew ll ty IIRI!`e livable by offering diversity and "roots". They bring tc the present the taste, values, and daily life of the past. Once they are gone, all this is lost. Thus, it is staff's opinion that loss of a house such as this is an adverse Impact and that alternatives such as incorporating this structure into the design of the condominium protect need to be considered. ~ O~ HISTORIC PRESERVATIf STAFF REPORT RE: POI - 9874 ARROn ROUTE June 2, 1988 Page 3 C. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a Point of Historic n eres s exemp un er CEQA (Article 19, Section 15308). Environmental assessment of the protect involving demolition of this house, however, needs to consider the negative impact on a historic resource. III. FACTS FOR FiNDIN05: The criteria for designating a Point of rs orilT^f-'cam are the same as for a landmark. The criteria that apply here are: A. Historic and Cultural Significance: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical Style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use wh lch was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the nergnoornoop. Tura. iu ay, t9iYj. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: fits hearing has been advertised in The Daily e o1~rE-newspaper and notices were sent to the owner andowners wr rn 300 feet. On May 16, staff spoke to Inland Design, the firm that is working on this pro,j ect. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation ommis~ recommend to the City Council that 9874 Arrow Route be designated a Point of Historic Interest because of its architectural interest and the scarcity of such buildings in the City. Staff is not recommending Landmark Designation at this time because of the lack of historical information. Respectfully submitted. ~l,~T~ r Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:ko Attachments: Point of Interest Form location Map Photographs Resolutions /J ~ fiISTCft IC PPESER +ATiON CCMNiSS IOG LdtlCMAP.K SUR': E'! Address: 9874 AKROW Apt Z!y' i/r C14 ~I I _ ~ ~ 1 rr'er " `%lew Loak Snq N0~7N Cato of Fho to S,og ~ ~ .~. , i - ~~ , it• '- M ~i t. ~, 1 k ~~ ~ i "' n ~ .,lY s.. ~~ ~ n Viow L^oY.Inq ;LY/TN t!BM~C~. i Oa to of Photo -5 ~'o' ~i Fags of Fage LJHI I L l U Y CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMCSSION MINUTES October 6, 1988 7:00 P.M. Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission to order at 1:00 p.m. The meeting was Held at Cions Park Community Center, 91x1 Base Cine Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Schmidt then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Mel icent Arner, Gene Billings, Alan Haskvitz, Bob Schmidt, Marsha Banks (arrived at 8:35 p.m.) COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: Ada Cooper, Marge Stamm STAFF PRESENT: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner; Arlene Banks, Associate Planner; Gati Sanchez, Secretary APPROVAL OF NIMUTES Motion: Moved by Billings, seconded by Arner, unanimously carried, Lo approve the minutes of September 1, 1988, as amended. . r . • ~ PUBLIC NEARI M6S A. A PIWP96Ab Tt-1~5lrMfl+ ~ME'6~9MiLL^NUU.K, 9874 ARRON HIGHNAY, RANCHO Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, Commissioner Arner asked if local significance was considered adequate to override owner objection. Ms. Banks stated that according to the draft owner policy, if an owner was not in arrprd uifh having 3 property designated as historically significant, then the property needed to be outstanding in some way. This property was not listed as having potentfal state or national significance. Commissioner Billings felt Lhe property did not stand out in architectural style. NPC Minutes -1- October 6, 1988 / 0 Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, stated a property would probably meet state criteria if the residence had been built and lived in by a founding member of the community and would not need national importance to 6e on the National Register. Commissioner Haskvitz asked if retaining the house would affect the number of units or the plans. Ms. 8a nks stated the property owner was interested in maximizing the number of units. Commissioner Arner stated she felt the house was to be Lhe focal point of the development. Ms. Banks noted the Commission could forward their concerns to the Planning Commission. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. Ms. Banks indicated City Council had stated if the City was going Lo ask a developer to build around a structure, it should De an important structure, and they asked if more historic informatfdn was available. Commissioner Haskvitz stated the house was not in the same category as other structures, but did not like to allow the destruction of the building for no purpose. He felt the Histdric Preservation Commission should ask Lhe Planning Commission to keep the building. Mr. Henderson suggested the Historic Preservation Commission could send a message to the Planning Commission, stating that even though the building was not designated as a iandmarx, the mstonc rreservanon commission reic cne building had local quality and should be retained ff possible. Motion: Moved by Haskvitz, seconded by Billings, to accept staff's recommendation to rescind its recommendation for designation, but to retain the house on the survey list, They further requested staff to send a letter to the Planning Commission stating the Historic Preservation Commission felt the house was a good architectural example and asking that the developer justify destruction in terms of number of units prior to letting the house be demolished. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, SCHMID7 NONE BANKS, COOPER, SIAMM --carried # t # # # HPC Minutes -2- October 6, 1988 ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC RRESERVA710N COMMISSION t1INUTES P,e gular Meeting August 3, ]989 Chairman Bob Schmidt called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Hi5[o ric Preservation Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Caii rc rnia. Chairman Scam idt then Ted in the pied ge of ai ieglmie e. ROLL CALL C CIR115 GION ERS: PRESENT: 1la rshe Banks, Gene Billings, Bob Schmidt, Ada Cooper, Steven Preston COMMISSIOtJERS: ABSENT: Alan Haskvitz STAFF PRESENT: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Arlene Banks, Associate Planner; Kelly Orta, Secretary k 4 1 } } [NTRODUC?ION OF 11FW HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER Chairman Schmidt introduced Steven Preston as the new Commissioner. . . . . } PP.ESENTRTION OF RESOLUTION OF COMM ENO RTION TO MARJORIE STAMM Chairman Schmidt presented the Resolution of Commendation to Ila rjo rie Stamm. w 4 4 } } APPRO'J AL OF 'U NUTES Motion; !1ov ed by Banks, seconded by Billings, r,arried as amended, to approve the minutes of June 1, 1989 and July 6, '.989. (Preston - abstained) . « . PCBLIC 14EARINGS C. R PRC R^SAL TO DESIGNATE THE CROSWELL HOUSE, 9874 ARROW HIGHWAY, RS A L ANOMARK - APN: 208-311-04, HPi MfthI TES -1- AUGUST 3, 1989 0. A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT 89-03 FOR THE CROSWELL HOUSE, 9874 ARROW HIGHWAY - APN: 208-311-04. Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Banks questioned if there were~any proposed alterations to the house at this time. Mrs. Banks responded no. She stated that one of the proposals that she had seen had an attached garage, but the last proposal she had seen had no changes pro"nosed. Commissioner 9anks questioned what the Landmark Alteration Pe rmi[ was for. Mrs. banks responded that the Landmark Alteration Permit is for the area around the building. Commissioner Preston stated that the property to the east has a public notice siGn Chat would suggest that it is scheduled for some sort of apartment or condominium project. Mrs. Banks stated that this was part of the condominium project. Commissioner Preston questioned if the develape rs intend to use the house for some other purpose, such as facility for the condominium development. Mrs. Banks responded that it is going to be Lhe manager's apartment. Commi55iu ner Preston questioned if the amount of property to remain associated with the house is known, or if it was going to be common open space. Mrs. Banks responded that she will be bringing bark all of this information, along with the plans, when the Landmark Alteration Permit is heard. Chairman 5c hm idt opened the public hearing. Hearing noone, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Cooper, seconded by Banks to recommend to the City Council Landmark Designation of the Croswell House, 9874 Arrow Highway and to Conti mie the proposal to approve Landmark Alteration Permit 89-03 for the Croswell House, 9814 Arrow Highway to the September 7, 1989 meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote: . AYES; CCMMISSIONERS; COOPER, BANKS, 9ILLiNGS, COOPER, ARNER, PRESTON NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMM ISSI ONEHS: IIASKVITZ --carried HPC MINUTES -2- AUGUST 3, 1989 / 7~ Acting Chairman Banks re-opened the public hearing. Hearing noone, Acting Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cooper moved to recommend designation of 7980 Vineyard, the Thomas House, as a Historic Landmark to the and City Council including staff's two additional recommendations to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Stamm seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, STAMM, .4RNER, BANC S, NASKVITZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COPA1i SSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCFM IOT --carried .. ~ x + : F.. A HISTORIC LANDMARK OR POINT OF HISTORIC ~,~ Arlene Banks presenied the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks opened the public hearing. John Liao, owner of the property, stated that they have presented the plan for initial review. He stated he is still in opposition to the designation, but he worked with the architect to incorporate the house into the design. He sta*_ed he will suffer a big loss with delignattcn. He questioned if there will be compensation for his loss. Victor Palos, architect with Inland Design. architect fnr thi< nrnierr <rarad that it was unfortunate his client was not aware of the possible designs tt on before he purchased the land and submitted the first site plan for review. He stated the density cannot be maximized with the house left on the property, He stated that a better design could be done without the house. He stated it will become an economic hardship trying to incorporate detailings from the existing house. Acting Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Larry Henderson stated that in response to Mr. Liao's question, the City has no mechanism for financial compensation to the developer. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the majority of developments with a maximum of 14 dwelling units per acre usually get about 10-11 dwelling units per ac. ~, which ~, about 75`; maximum den si to. Acting Chairman Banks stated she would like to see the four units in front of the house be moved for better vt sibil lty. HPC MINUTES -6- JULY 1, 2988 I~I Larry Henderson stated that this project has not been presented to the Design Review Committee and they may be have other ideas as to Lhe design. The Commission concurred that the developer should be commended for working with staff in coming up with a possible solution. Commissi ~~er He skvitz moved to recommend designation of 9874 Arrow Highway as a Historic Landmark to the City Council for approval. Commissioner Arner seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ, ARNER, COOPER, BANKS, STAMM r{nF C; rrYAMictrnHcPc; yn yr ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, SCHMIDT --carried i The Conmission concurred on the following items that might be included in the design: ti le roofs with curly 0's at the ends, tale vents, stucco exterior, i Mission style roof line, and flattened arches. i --- --1 + ... + . NE11 BUSINESS G. INCENTIVES FOR PRESERVATION Arlene Banks presented the staff report. The Commission, together with City staff, prioritized the incentfves and discussed further action invclved in each incentive. The Ccmmi ssion directed staff to pursue as a first priority an Ordinance for Demolition Dei ay. , The Commission directed sta to further pursue an Ordinance regarding Facade Easements, to investigate fort r the Mills Act, to further pursue an Ordinance regarding waiving of F s, to get more information on Marks Historical Rehabilitation Act, Provision of Design Services and Property Tax Rebate. The Commission also direr to staff to further investigate Ordinances for Density Bonus, Expansion of Non-Co orming Uses and for Examining Parking Requirements. The Commission concurred at when the Incentives are finished, have a seminar with the 8oardof Realtors r their educa icon. H. P07ENTI AL AGENDA ITEMS FOR AUGUST 4, 1988 ~~ crie Da riki vi Bienteu' the itdff reuitr E. ~a c+n 3wA that e_np nnn_dori information on these items. The Commission concurr~ that 10213 19th Street and 87.91 Foothill Boulevard should be heard in Septen~er and that staff should initiate an application on the residence on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, north of Victoria, and seta public hearing for 9468 Lom ta, and Haven Avenue Cypress Trees for August, The Commission directed staff initiate an application on 8818 Archibald Avenue for August HPC MINUTES -7- JULY 7, 2988 I (~ Commissioner Cooper stated that it is one of the oldest buildings, but is concerned about putting in a big two-story building across the street from the Thomas Winery. She stated she would like to see the plan. Commissioner Ha sk vitz moved to continue the designation of 7980 Vineyard Avenue, The Thomas House to the July 7, 1988 regular meeting and direct staff to check into moving the house to another location. Commissioner Cooper seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HASK VITZ, COOPER, STAMM, SC HM IDT, BANKS, AP.NER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 81LLINGS --carried . ~ . ~ . . OLD BUSINESS H. LEOIG HOUSE UPDATE Arlene Banks presented the memorandum. The Commission concurred to have Mark Lorimer keep Arlene updated on the move of the house. I. ALTA LOMA HONOR ROLL Arlene Banks made reference to the memorandum. The Commission concurred that they felt this was located in an out-of-the-way place. Arlene Banks stated that the City maintenance crew could not maintained it because it is on private property. The Commission directed Arlene to get in contact with Mr. George Leimen of the Rancho Cucamonga lunerican Legion Post to see if they could help in the maintenance. • NEN BUSINESS ~~• - APN• 208- n i -ua Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. HPC MINUTES -1- JUNE 2, 1988 l ~1 ~ John Liao, owner of 9814 Arrow Route, stated that he is opposed to the designation. He stated he was concerned over the restrictions and the affect of the value of the property. He stated that if this was designated, he would not be able to develop it the way he wanted. He stated he would donate the structure if someone wanted to move it. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cooper moved to continue the designs Lion of 9874 Arrow Route to the JuIY 7 1989 regular meeting to enablz staff `vrl ng the site pion in for Commission is review. Commissioner Ha skvitz seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: COOPER, HASKVITZ, STAA44, SC HMIDT, ARNER, BAMCS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS L...~'°°^' --carried K. JULY 1, 1988 SCHEDULED LANDMARK PUBLIC HEARINGS The Commission concurred to not hold any new public hearings at the July 7, 1988 regular meeting due to an already full agenda. ANNOIINCEMENiS Commissioner Banks announced that the Eti wands Historical Society's Rummage Sale is June 11th. Arlene Banks made the following announcements: I) Mr. Pallay is workingg with the City to move a historic house from Pasadena to Rancho Cucamonga; 2) an Environmental Impact Report is being done on the Foothill Freeway and will be commenting on cultural resources adjacent to the corridor; 3) there is a permit for all but 300 cubic yards of the rack pile; 4) the Planning Commission approved a concrete tale roof for the Gerber House; 5) Paula Pac hon, Community Services, received a call from Mary Smith wanting to donate a 1913 tool box used in making shoes. CC~/IISS[ON BUSINESS ^ YroPo,~„ ao ~=ar the agendas of Ju iy and August Oi any new ',terns to freeVup Arlene to develop a brochure explaining Historic Preservation and to direct staff to develop some amendments to the Ordinance that provide positive incentives for owning a landmark. The Commission concurred. # # R # X # HPC MINUTES -8- / q'/ JUNE 2, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENOiNG APPROVAL OF THE CROSWELL HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9874 ARROW ROUTE, AS A LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has received and reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NON, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Num e-6 r 2U1~311 -04. SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria establishe~Tn-Cha er 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historic and Cultural Significance: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting fie proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood (Ord. 70 59, 1979). $ECTYON III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEOA (Article 19, Sect on ccrTlnN iV• Ra<cA pn 4hn c~h54gn}ial uyi genre reset ved and ray{ewerl by this ~Cbmni ssion and based on the fi r•dings set forth above, ~J HPC RESOLUTION N0. RE: CROSWELL HOUSE LD IWgust 3, 1989 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLYEO, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Comm ssion does hereby recommend approval of designation of The Croswell House, 9874 Arrow Route as a landtna rk. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 1989, BY: ~--bob mi airman AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l~I~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~_ l i O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE CROSWELL HOUSE, 9874 ARRON ROUTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landnark Oesi gna Lion and issued Resolution No. 89-03 recommending to this City Council that said Landmark Designation be approve WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifics ily finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Nwn ear ZOB~11-04. SECTION II: The propdsed landmark meets the following criteria establishe~.n Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga ILnicipal Code: A. Historic and Cultural Significance: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood (Ord. 10 S9, 1979), SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Section SECTION [Y: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this ounc and based on the findings set forth above, NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve designation of The Croswell House, 9874 Arrow Route, as a landmark. /~~ ~- ---- CITY' OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 _~ 'i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Engineering AT de SUBJECT: Approval of the detachment of Tract 13063, located east of East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue, from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, approval of the fornwtion of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and setting the public hearing for November 1, 1989 RELOMIEIUATIDM: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions detaching Tract 13063 from Landscaoe Maintenance District No. 1, initiating and forming Landscape Maintenance District No. 8, approving the Dreliminary Engineer's Report and setting the date of public hearing for November 1, 1.989. Background/Analysts Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 contains an area from Highiand Avenue to Foothill Boulevard and east of Etiwanda Avenue and I-15 to the the easterly city limits. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 was given preliminary ..~__ _~_.,..., u.t .~.,... ~.. u.. 7 in a~oA iuef .ih nF •hie u yyi~wi ni~..u La.n......p.. ~~... ~~... ~....... ..~. ., .~~_.__ a--. ^^. .., .. district, was formed on June 21, 1989. It was agreed at that time that all present and future developments in Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 were compatiule with what is planned for this area. Tract 13063, located east of East Avenue, south of Highland, was annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 on January 4, 1984, but because this development is more compatible with the work plan area in Landscape Maintenance District No. B, it will be detached from Landscape Maintenance No. 1 and included with the formation of the new district. Respec tfu fitted, ~~ j~z ~ ouw •u nn~~n Attachment /9 ~ RESOLUTION N0. 8 l - I l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIWONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 NHEREAS, Part 2 of Division 15 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets d Highways Code authorizes this City Council to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to improvement and maintain landscape located therein; and NHEREAS, this City Council declares to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. B" to improvement and maintain landscaping located within the boundaries of said Landscape Maintenance District. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This Cfty Council hereby proposes the formation of an assessment s r c to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 8" pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2: The nature, location and extent of the improvements to be instal a an ma ntained with 'Landscape Maintenance District No. 8" are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" Assessment Diagram and the location and extent of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 is more particularly described in Exhibit "B" and the City Council hereby specifies that designation "Landscape Maintenance District Na. 8' Ultimate District Boundary for said landscape maintenance district as included 1n the "Engineer's 4nnn rt" SECTION 3: The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to cause the prepara on and filing of a report wfth respect to the formation of Landscape Maintenance District in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of the California Streets b Highways Code. /99 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~_ I ~Gf' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 WHEREAS, on September 20, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said Li ty Council has duty considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses a sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descry e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sa ssessment District 1n proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained 1n said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION d: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for-f e~purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. / (J`i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 TRACT N0. 13063 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Civision 5 of the Street and Highways Code, State of California ,Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This report deals with the establishment of a Landscape Maintenance District for the South Etiwanda area. The District will originally comprise of Lhe boundaries of the Tract No. 13063. Areas to be included in the work program are the trees and Dlanting within certain rights-of-way of streets and freeway slopes as determined by the City; street trees and eucalyptus windrows within street rights-of-way and within dedicated tree maintenance easements as required by specific plans or by the City Council, the public Darks, the greenway and paseo systems, community gataways, regional and community trail systems including lighting, signing, striping and all other inprovements such as play equipment, fences, walls, etc. within those systems; such similar areas as required by the Specific Plan or by the City Council or as dedicated by various subdivisions. The work program generally excludes the parkways landscaping (except the street trees) adjoining the fronts and sides of single family residences, adjoining multifamily residential units and adjoining commercial and IIIl1.I LY LI VIIGI ueveiuylneui wili~il wiii ue main La iueli uy Li1we ueveiuylnen ia. The District will eventually include the majority of the areas included within the South Etiwanda areas and other areas generally comprised of properties bounded on the north by Highland Avenue, on the south by Foothill Boulevard, on the west by Etiwanda Avenue and I-15, and on the east by east city limit. SECTION 3. SCOPE Of NORK The areas listed above will become part of the active work program at such time as the specific areas are dedicated to and accepted by the City. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, the areas improved by the developer with landscaping, irrigation and other required improvements, then after a period of maintenance by the developer as determined by the City Engineer, the acceptance of maintenance by Lhe nu inwnan,.c UI]N ILL. IIICIC OIII uC a lay 1.111E If Ulll 411C Urlglllal dCdll.a 4l Un until the pi strict actually begins the maintenance of the areas. On certain work program areas where abutting properties will never be developed, the District may install the needed improvements as required by the City Council and maintain the soma. ~0 I The plans and specifications for all improvements within the work program areas to be installed by the developer will be completed by the developer at their cost for the individual areas to be maintained within the subdivision and will be approved by the Community Development Department. Annual Engineer's Reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council defining the specific work program for each year and its estimated cost. As development proceeds within the District, the areas to be maintained by the District will increase and so will the cost; however the number of units will also increase. The estimated maintenance cost and estimated assessment rate per unit for the original District and the completed DT strict are tabulated herein after. The assessment rate is expected to vary year to year as more areas are annexed to the District until such tfnte as all the properties within the ultimate district boundary are annexed, after which the assessment rate should remain constant excluding cost of living increase, Maintenance Activities Detail maintenance activities on the areas to be maintained by the District consist of providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of the landscaping including: cultivation, irrigation, trimming spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; maintenance, repair, energy costs, and replacement as necessary of all required lighting within the park, greenway, pa seo and trail system; removal of graffiti from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas; repair, removal ar replacement of all or any part of arty improvement. SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS No costs will be incurred by the District for original inlprovenlent C Un5 Gr11C Lion except: ier certain nominal areas as menLlmnee In JeC L10n J, Ine cost of any new construction will have negligible effect on the total assessment of the District due to its scope in comparison with the overall District work program areas. Based on data from other cities and from the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Landscape Maintenance Districts and from the review of proposed work program areas, it is estimated that based on current dollars, the maintenance cost for assessment purposes, estimated areas to be maintained and the estimated number of assessment units will be as follows: A. Original District The estimated costs for the on gt nal District comprising of Tract No. 13063 are shown below: Parkway landscaping i iitCiuuing iitipes 8 monument walls) 16,600 SF 0 (0.35 (5,810.00 Trees 203 EA 8 (5.00 (1,015.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST (6,825.00 ,.Jn ~ B. Complete District The estimated costs (as current dollars) for the District upon completion of all areas within South Etiwanda area are as shown below: Parkways, trails, greenways, freeway slopes, etc. 1,599,000 SF @ 50.35/SF = S 559,650 Neighborhood parks 1,524,600 SF @ 50.35/SF = S 533,610 Eucalyptus Ni ndrows 5,516 @ f150.00 = S 836,400 Street Trees 2,420 @ 55.00 = S 12,100 3~I,4d~tiQ~ SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of the Assessment District are attached to this report and labeled "Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 "Exhibit A". These diagrams are hereby tncorporated into the text of this report. Precise lot dimensions are included in the referenced tract maps and Assessor's records. The District will originally be comprised of Tract No. 13053. The assessment rate of the tract will be as shown in Section 6, phase one construction. Additional tracts will be annexed into the District after its fornwtion. The final configuration of the District will nrli~An !hn Cnnlh Cliuan Aa a a+H ~n L.I.. An.~.i hnA a~ •h.. .. n.H ... nna .~nnno n _ .. ..,___ .... ___... r_. ~.__._. .~ _~.~. .~~ r^~~~. ..~. between Highland Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, east of Eti Wanda Avenue and I- 15. A copy of the proposed final District No. 8 boundary is attached to this report as Exhibit "B". SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS A. PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTION (Tract No. 13063) Maintenance costs for Phase One comprising Tract 13063 are found to be ~of specific benefit to all property within the District in accordance with the following relations: Total Annual Cost (Section 4) = 56,825.00 Aiceccmani iini tc G~mmarv Land Use Assessment Units/Unit Assessment Units Dwelling Units 73 1 13 TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 73 ?C~ .3 Assessment Rate = 56,825.00 t 73 = (93.49 Effective Assessments f93.49 per year or (7.79 per month per dwelling unit Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessment will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be Gased on actual maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries. B. Complete District Maintenance costs for the entire District are found to be of specific benefit to all property within the District in accordance with the following relations: Assessment Units Summary Assessment Land Use Assessment Units/Unit Units Residential Dwelling Unit 1 D.U. 1 Other Land Uses (eg. Camnercial, Institutional) 1 .0 acre 2 Total Annual Cost (per Section 4) = Si,941 ,760 Assessment Units Summary nano use um cs gssessmenc Assessment Units/Unit Units Dwelling Units 4,145 1 4,145 Other Land Uses e.g. Commercial, Institutional) 35 Acres 2 Units 10 TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 4,215 Assessment Rates 51,941,760 t 4,215 5460.68 Effective Assessments (460.68 per year or f38.39 per month per unit Estimated assessments are for comparison only. Actual assessment will be set by public hearing each year in June and will be based on actual maintenance expenses and developed land use summaries. ~~~ ~/ EX/YBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 ;ice ~~ • ' ~i F~i ~. i~~ Ihi r .~ , ~~ ~~~ ~ . s' >~ 2 s a ~~ AVENUE 11 I ,,,,,,~ ~s ._ .i.' i i - ~~ I `- ~ i i r_:i°~, 3' ~ ~~ , ,~ •, :~~ s ~ / . l ~ ' ~ °~ i. . . ~ . ~ - r . . ~ ~ 1 i °'t ~I s: u~ yl ~ - - Sys, ~.:~.....a-.</+i ~, ~ -- 1 ~ ". ~; 4i 0~ i i ~_, ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ y ~. lt.~ ~____ ___ -L. _y- -/ YL ~ --T- ~~ ~- VIC'LORIA AVENUE p6-+ TRACT ^]O. 1:+Ub.i AS RECrX2DED uti JrSiUAR't 3Gr 13A3 IN HOOft 218, PACES iJ-14 OF TRACT MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COLT"TY RECCRDr COUNTY OF :AN BERNARDINO, STATF. OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ ~ / ~3n(--~- FORMATION CITY OF RANCI~10 CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~, EXFIIBTT "8" IAT1MI~t OIS'fRICT B01N~ARY LANDSCAPE MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~f• f ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING THE DETACfWENT OF TRACT 13063 AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, on September 20, 1989, this City Council adopted Resolution No. 89- * proposing the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance Distric4 No. 8" for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements to be located within said assessment district; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 1989, this City Council preliminarily approved an Engi pear's Report with respect to said "Landscape Maintenance District No. 8" and caused said Engineer's Report to be filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Tract 13063 work program :rea is included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 1; and WHEREAS, the design of the landscaping of Tract 13063 is compatible with the design of landscaping of ad,~acent tracts included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 8; and WHEREAS, this City Council desires to form Landscape Maintenance District Nv. 8 for the maintenance of certain landscape improvements to be ivcated herein. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga iiereuy resui ves as ipllpws: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby declares its intention to order the formation of an assessment district to be known as "Landscape Maintenance District No. 8" for the purpose of maintaining certain landscape improvements therein and to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2. That Tract 13063 be detached from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and be included in the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8. SECTION 3. The landscape Improvements to be maintained wlthln the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 are more particularly described on Exhibit "A" and the general location of Landscape Ma+ntenance "istrict No. o l; more particuiariy described On the diagram attached as °Exhi bit R" and incorporated in the "Engineer's Report". ~: '~J / RESOLUTION N0. PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a full detailed description of the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and of land within said assessment district. SECTION 5. This City hereby sets the date, time and place of a public hearing on the formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 to be as follows: DATE: November 1, 1989 TIME: 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line Road City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ J~~ CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~t GATE: September 20, 1989 ~ ~ 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner D'~: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner '~ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS ~~~~ AMENOM ENT 89-02 - BLACKMON HOMES INC. - A request to Pre-zone approximately 25 acres located on the north east corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues to Low Density ~ Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) - ~ APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, and 18, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGPEEMENT 89 03 BLACKMON HOMES, INC - A request to approve a Oevelopment Agreement for approximately 25 acres consisting of 78 Residential lots located at the north east corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, and 18. ENViRONM ENTAL A.SSESSM ENT AND ANNEXATION AGREEM^"Ni 8n 03 i BLACKMON HOMES. INC. - A request to approve an annexation Agreement for Oevelopment and annexation of approxima tel_v 25 acres located on the north east rn rnnr of u;,, hi ,.,n ,.,a Rochester Avenues - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, O4, and 16, 1. RECOMMENDATION; The following items are recommended for approval: Development Districts Amendment 89-02, Development Agreement 89-03, and Annexation Agreement 89-03, (See attached Staff Report of the July 26, 1989 planning Commission meeting.) II. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting to annex approximately 25 acres of San Bernardino County undeveloped land into the City for the purpose of developing under City Standards. The appl iratinn ;ncl~~nes Cc.c'o---- ,-- vmm~t tr ii ti wnendmont "Pre-zo nej consistent with the General Plan of Low Residential ~2-4 dwelling units per acre), Development Agreement setting the development of 78 residential lots fora term of 7 years, and an application to Local Agency Formation Comnissf on (LAFCO) for the annexation of the property from an unincorporated area in the County to the City. c-'U(~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DDA 89-02, DA 89-03, EA d September 20, 1989 Page 2 III. BACKGROUND: AA 99-C3 - BLACKMON, HOMES A. Pre-Zone/Development Agreement: On July 26, 1989, the Planning Conenission reviewed and reconone nded approval of the Pre-Zone and the Development Agreement for this site. The Pre-Zone request is for Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), which is consistent with the General Plan designation. The Coiwiiss ion reconone nded approval of the Pre-zone at Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acres. The applicant concurs with the density set by the approved tract map of 7E lots and agrees to meet all City standards and pay City fees for development. The term of the Agreement is seven years. 8. Annexation Agreement: An Annexation Agreement is a part of this application (see attached Resolution). Through the Annexation Agreement, the City agrees to pursue annexation through the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFC01 and the applicant agrees to annex to the City. On April 19, 1989, the City Council approved a Resolution to begin processing to annex the subject property to Lhe City and forwarded the application fer annexation to LAFCO. C. Tax Excha nae: - On July 5, 1989, this Council approved the tax exc na nge proceedings between the Lity and County. This action is part of the annexation proceedings. D. Envi r::nmental: An Environmental Assessment has been completed by staff and all possible impac ~s have been successfully mitigated and the Planning Comm ssion recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on Lhe Development Districts Amendment (Pre-Zone) and the Development Agreement. IV. ANALYSIS: The project's intensity and land use is consistent with the City's General Plan and the surrounding areas. The applicant has agreed to develop the subject site to City standards or as conditioned in the fmm t~'~ rnnA;r;nne ,.o a ppru val. .~_ _ __.._._._..,, ,,, The format of the Development Agreement is modeled after the Ahmanson Annexation 8A-04 which was approved by the City Council in January of this year. ~7 I C1 T'! COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DOA 89-02, DA 89-03, EA & AA 89-03 - BL AC KMON, HOMES September 20, 1989 Page 3 The subject Development Agreement outlines the res ponsibi ii ties of the City and the Developer. The Developer agrees to develop at City standards or as conditioned in the County Conditions of Approval approved by the Board of Supervisors in December of last year. In addition, Developer will participate in a Mello Roos Comnun ity Facilities District which will mitigate the impaction to the School Districts. The term of the Agreement will last a period of seven years. V. FACTS FOR FINDING: All the facts for findings can be made. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: These items hav=_ been advertised as a public hearing in the Daily Report newspaper, the property posed, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VII. CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission reconune ndnd approval of the approving Oevelopme nt Districts lvnendment Pre-Zo nr 89-02 and Oevelo pment Agreement 89-03. Staff recommends that the City Cou rcil concur and approve Annexation Agreement 89-03, P,es ull mit i Br d er City Tanner . 6 B: JG :sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" -Project Map Planning Co mmiss iori Staff Report of July 26, 1989 Planning Commission Minutes of July 26, 1989 Resolution Aporov ina Anne nation Agreement Ordinance Approving Pre-Zone Ordinance Approving Development Agreement _ _._._. _._. _._._._ r_._ r._._._.-.___.- --'-- c' . .; .~:. ~ ~~ ~ ~, ,~. L. ,. i l ~ t-p!l1t~'OR IMFiO[MO~ NI slD , i wa ~\ 0A AN O ;L._ u _ rr ~~ =~ fii GNU GN - ~ J , J W ~ _~ ~ s FOO NILL ; ecn - o _ --`r-*^' i W o eln W 6 t ~ ..- W -'- ~ m ~ ~ ~Ih U SAN 9ERNARDIN~FREE D r /\ l ^1(~tI'H L I~1 1 \ ll' ITEM: ANE%ATgN 6403 IZ,~•~.~ «x.•'~~~iE~ TITLE: vlCarrMAP f'I,ANNING DIVIS1pIV EXHIBIT 'A• x:ALE NOrE ~~ 1 ~ O ma Q ~ PLANNED ~ ~` h ~ /'~ COMMUNITY ~ ~ ; / i i i~ ~!~'a~ ~ u .~,~ $ ~`~ i I.~:,, N.•ci+c,~~vo I i ~I ~ -- r. i,v ~p c w Couv ry 4' . V. ,Ti P. SG R.~A.CNG C..rs+r+oa.~:.+ Q i ..~ T. / Q h o~ h l-iVdA/L/6' U~ 1 rya ~4 ti V 4 l N(~tT'H R.1~('I iU C~C~.~K~;GA ITE.`I~ ANNEXATION 89.03 TITLE SITE MAP EXHIBIT 'B' Sc:aLE NONE ~~~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: July 26, 1989 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commi sst on FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - reques o pre-zone approx ma e y acres o vacant land located at the northeast corner of Hi ghiand and Rochester Avenues to a density of Low-Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acrel - AP N: 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, d 18. (Continued from June 28, 1989.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 tlLAl:x mUN pumas inc. - A request to approve a uevei opment reemen or approximately 25 acres, consisting of 78 lots at approximately 3,2 dwelling units per acre, located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN: 225-152 -01, 02, 03, 04, 6 18. (Continued from June 28, 1989.) noGTniti.T. ine ayyiiw Limu ice, o ue~ci opnrcuL uiei~itL nircn~oueui. pre-zone and Development Agreement are part of a package of actions for development of 78 units (County approved tract map 13835 - see Exhibit "C") on 25 acres of undeveloped land located on the northeast corner of H19hland and Rochester Avenues. The applicant has requested annexation to the city, An application for 5nnezatlon has been filed by the City with the San Bernardino County Local Agency Fornwtton Commission. fI. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; The applicant is requesting the pre-zon ng o approx ma e y 5 acres of undeveloped land as part of annexation proceedings and 1n preparation of development. An apps lcatton for approval of a Oev el opment Agreement for a term of 7 years is also requested. A. Surroundlnq Land Use and Zon1 North - Existing single residence, within the County West Foothills Community Plan designated RES 4 (4 dwelling units per acre). c I `j PLANNING COMNI SSION 'OFF REPORT DA 89-03 E DDA 89-02 - BLACKMON HOMES July 26, 1989 Page 2 South - Foothill Freeway (Route 30) corridor. East - Ya cant Flood Control (Day Creek Channel)/County West Foothills Community Plan designated RCN (Rural Conservation). Nest - Ca ryn Planned Caimuni ty, City designation Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units Der acre). 8, General Plan Designations: Project Site -County General Plan is RES. 4 (4 dwelling units per acre). Cf ty General Plan is Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). North - County Generai Plan is RES. 4 (4 dwelliny units per acre). City General Plan is Low Resi dentiai (2-4 dwelling units per acre). South - City General Plan is Flood Control. East - County General Plan 1s RCN (Rural Conservation). City General Pian Law Resi dentiai Fiood Control. West - City fene ral Plan is low Residential {2-4 dwelling units per acre). C. Site Cha roc to ri stl cs: The site is vacant and undeveloped. uxe the rest of the northeast portion Oi the City, the site is on an alluvial fan, sloping to the south. Vegetation on the site consists of mostly alluvial fan scrub brush. The soil is coarse, mostly boulders, rubble and cobbles. I iI. ANALYSIS: A. General: The purpose of the annexation is to proceed with p ans or residential development and to participate in financing mechanisms for infrastructure which are 1n place or to be in plate in cooperation with the City. An application for annexation has been flied by the City with the San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission. The applicant has not filed any further project appltcatl4ns with the County preferring io process through the City. The following analysis summarizes the main points of the proposed Development Agreement. ~~/J PLANNING COMMISSION FF REPORT OA 89-03 d DDA 89-02 - BLACKMON HOMES ,lu ly 26, 1989 Page 3 Density: The City's General Plan designation for this st to is Low T(esi dents ai (2-4 dwelling units per acre). On December 19, 1988, the County of San Bernardino approved a tract map consisting of 78 lots. The density of the approved tract map is approximately 3.5 dwe111 ng units per acre. The County's General Plan designation for this site 1s RES. 4 (4 dwelling units per acre) and the City's is Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per ac rel. Therefore, the designations of the County's and City's General Plans are consistent regarding this site. C. Off-site Improvements: The applicant will provide street mprovemen s on oc ester and Highland Avenues. The improvements will 6e to City standards. Specific improvements by the applicant are identified in Exhibit "C" of the Development Agreement. D. Reimbursements: The applicant may request a credit against requ r~nage fees and road improvements fees in regards to infrastructure construction that exceeds the demands of the project. E. Fees: The applicant will pay the usual C?ty fees wh?ch will be-frozen to the current fee schedule for 12 months upon approval of this agreement. F. Special Dis tracts: The Development Agreement will require the par c pa on n special 01str1 cts as needed to provide infrastructure for development, including a Mello-Roos Fire District and a Police Protection District. G. Schools: in regard to school impacts to the Etiwanda School UisirTc't, as required by the District, the applicant will be required to pay fees based on the square footage of each residence. In addition, impacts on the Chaffey School District are discussed in the Environmental Assessment section of Lh75 report. H. Parks: As approved by Community Services, the applicant will pay park fees Instead of setting aside any land for parks within the development. i. Term; The term of the agreement w711 be seven (1) years. iV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the T.nitial Study an rev ewe a nv ronmentat Checklist, Part II of the initial Study, and has found impacts that could occur but '.'111 be mitigated. ~~1,~ PLANNING COMMf SSION OFF REPORT DA 89-03 8 DDA 89-02 - DLACK MON HOMES duly 26, 1989 Page 4 One of those impacts identified is student enrollment to Lhe Chaffey School District. In a letter dated June 14, 1989, Steven Butters, Director of Business Services for the Chaffey School District, recommended two measures to mitigate the potential impact: 1. Blackmon Homes Inc. or designee not being permitted to pull building permits until after state funding for Rancho Cucamonga Nigh Sch eol is secured or; 2. Blackmon Homes Inc. tract Da rtf ci pa to in a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or some other funding mechanism to augment development fees. Within the attached Development Agreement of this Staff Report, Mr. Butters recommendation of number 2 has been incorporated. (See Section 3M of the Development Agreement.) Another potential impact, vehicular tirculatlon, has been addressed and mitigated, through the provision of accelera Lion and deceleration lanes and fair share contra button for a traffic signal per the attached County Condi tt ons of Approval and the ' Development Agreement. Based on the above findings, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration under the Califcrnla Environmental Quality Act. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The followinc findi nos may be made by the ann nPT-l g ComnfssTon for Development Agreement 89-03 and Development Districts Amendment 89-02. ' A. The intended Land use is compatible with the surrounding land uses in terms of circulation and intensity of use. B. The project will not have any adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. C. The project is in conformance with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. Y;. CORRESPOIAENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in e a y-Sfeport newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent is .,,, c~i:•: carers within 3C0 feet of the Dro,ject site. PLANNING COMMISSION , .OFF REPORT DA 89-03 d DOA 89-02 - BLACKMON NOMES July 26, 1989 Page 5 VII. RECOAHENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Comml ssi on a op attached Resolutions recommending approval of Development Di;tri ct Amendment 89-02 and Development Agreement 89-03 t0 the City Council. Respectfully ffibmi tted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:JG:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - W cini ty Map Exhibit "B" - Site Map Exhibit "C" - Tract Map Resolution Recommending Approval of DDA 89-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of DA 89-03 (including the Development Agreement 89-03) ~\ / b Cha McN1e1 opened the public he arirg. Al 'de it ick, ral Partner, stated he agreed with the st of ort and was available to a questions. Hearing no further t ny, the public hear log wag, ed. Commissl ~~er Ch it lea state peered to be, ~ ystraight-forward division and she supported the project. , Chairman McNiei asked if Che par area was appropriately divided in relat tan to the bui ld irg s. Ns. Kroll responded that t ark ing relate the bu ildtngs appropriately and Standard Condition 5 ided for rec tproca Ss. Motto n: Moved by tie a, seconded 6y Neinberg er, opt the Aese lu Lion approving Envir ntal Assessment and Parcel Map 1250 tion carr ted by the follow to e: AYES: /L`OMMISSIONERS: CHI TI EA, MCNI0., 11EINBERGER NOES// LOM'li SSIONERS: NONE • ~ ~ a D E oLRb nrn+nr7~l - n r ayu a, w M' c- ~~ ov Y' ° " "~ V ~ ° ' Avenues to a densl ty of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units Der acre) - APN: 225-L52-01, 02, 03, 04, 6 18. (Continued from June 28, 1989.) acres, consisting of 18 lots at approximately 3.2 dwelling units per acre, located on the northeast corner of HighlaM and Rochester Avenues - APN: 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, L 18. (Continued tram June 28, 1989.) Jeff Gravel, AsslstanL Planner, presented the staff report and suggested minor wording cherges in paragraph 7 of the Development Agreement regardlrg t nd emn ific at ton. He stated the charges had been requested by the Ctty Attorney. Chairman NcNiel opened the public hear iiy. Jeff Blackmon, applicant, requested that the numtler of side-on garages be reduced from the 50% mentioned 1n the Architectural and Design Guidelines. He Planning Commission Minutes -?- July 25, 1989 I stated that bec else of the slopes, too mr ch df the rear yards would be consumed by side-on garages. He suggested staggerlrg the garages and setting some back an the lots to Drovide a varied look. He felt the protect should ertu late the Vintage iaryn protect, which has all front-entry garages. Chairman McNtel stated the requ ire meat had been included to avoid the look of perpetual garage doors found in same standard tracts. He felt that the 50% requirement should be left in the Agreement. He stated the policy had Deen adopted after the Caryn Development Agreement and he did not wish to make any charges to the number. Mr. 8l ackmon asked if any charge could be made in the future if it is found that the ru nber does ;ot we rk. Commissioner Chit tea stated there was already latitude for reduction in 5% increments down to ZO% 6y submitting add atonal floor plans. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Ctty Attorney, Bugg este4 that the wording be changed from "Developer should consider..." to "Developer shall provide..." Pat Thomas, 10515 Rl ng, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that students would be going to Et iwa nda H1gh, which was already impacted, and she asked when homes world be built. Chairman Mc Niel stated that he d1d not know and indicated that the school. Issue and school construct tan schedl le is a state matter. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the Architectural aM Design Gu idellnes were modeled after the Ettwarda Specific Plan. He stated the developer could provide a smaller percentage of side-on garages by prov tdlrg add it tonal floor ..r_.~ ue <,~n .~.. n.y.lnnn~nr an wear nt wan lA not allow the develoder to request a Variance on this matter,-but would require Planning Comalsston and City CourK 11 approval for a mod if scat ion to the Development Agreement. Commissioner Chttiea felt a lot of fle>c16111ty was already built into the guidelines. Chairman McNiel agreed the wording should be changed to "shall provide." Commissioner Chlttea stated the Cfty wanted to provide better neighborhoods by moving for,rard from Caryn, Instead of emu lating it. She supported the Development District Aarndment and the Development Pgreement with the "shalt provide" word tag. Mot tan: Moved by Chltlea, seconded by Netnberyer, to adopt the Re solutions -corsndiry approval -f Enrtrcn~M.al AsSSSSaent arA Development Dlstric*_ AnRndment 89-02 and Environmental Assessment and Development Agreement 89-03 with modlflcations td correct Lhe wordlrg of parogragh 7 regarding Ind emn ifl cat ton aM to charge the wording of the Architectural and Design Guidelines to "shall provide." Motion carried by the following vote: Pianntng Commission Minutes -4- July 26, 1989 c',~® AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MC NI EL, wEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSION ER S: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLANESLEY, TO LSTOY -tarried .... . a restaurant use, located ai 8034 Haven Avenue - APNt 1071- Tam Gra ss is to nt Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Mc opened the pub llc hearing. P hyfilts Hyde, for of Operations, requested that the D e allowed to be larger than f ec au se she stated they were conslderi av leg strolling 6 ands far wedding tlons and felt those ho 101ng ba nq may wish to have larger bands. She sted coed it ton 8 be removed t law far use of the p at to by strolling ba She also requested that tion 6 6e changed to permit access to the from either a ma to for door or from the restaurant. Mr. Grahn sia ted that staff any main building entrance, for fire exit. flowing access t0 the bar from: the rear exit to be used only Hearing no further testimony, the publ ar leg was closed. cente Co ,stoner Chit lea felt entertainment at Mango's Beachfront Cafe would rest to the cent r to Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 26, 1984 Oan Ca lemon, Principal Planner, ted Cameissian had In the past supported use of ente rt afnmm nt a pat9 a. He felt the use could be ~vii.~v~~cc .`.~ wi aic u. we cif ~c ,a ~yyii~atimi yiJw ii. Chairman Mc Niel stated staff d not appear to ha concern with the second entrance to the bar from paL to area and he felt ax imam four-piece band might not always be app late. Commissioner ChIL1e ~ ncurred that 1t would ba accepts to allow larger bands. She stat ~11ked the a~tence of pat to mislc rendered what wculd happen tf~, r restaurants wished to use the patio. Brad Buller ~ ty Planner, felt tt might he appropriate to r t written consent fr d~olning tenants to conJurlctlon with a Te~orary Use 1t. He felt it condition were Included 1n this Enter taimlent Permit, 1 ld be Imp le as part of the policy for fu Wre Temporary Use Permits the ~ %~ ! ORDINANCE N0. 400 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN f, HO CUC AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-02, Pk E-ZONING APPkOXIMAT ELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LPND TO LOW OEN SI TY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITES PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND APlD ROCHESTER AVENUES AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, and 18 A. Recitals (i) On duly 26, 1989, the Planning Commission of the rSity of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development District Amendment Pre-Zone. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Plann in9 Commission recommended that the City Council adopt Deve]apme nt District Pmendme nt No 89-D2. (ii) On August 16, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 8. Ord finance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. SECiiON 2: This Cou ncii hereby finds and certifies that tire project has Seen reviewed and consid?red in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a ;Jegat five Declaration. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in to runs of PGI. GI)Fl. .l rl(1 1'll lllll.lt 11 CA I]tIII V_ land use in the surrounding area; alnd~ b. The proposed district cha n9e would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment nor the surrounding pro pe rt firs; and The proposed amendment is in con fo rina nce with the General Plan. ~~ Ordinance No. 400 Page 2 SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Development District Amendment 89-02 Pre-Zoning the district designation Low Density Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) for those properties located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper o{ general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4` ~a3 ORDINANCE N0. 40i AN ORD INMIC-e OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIf1G DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 FOR APPRCX IMAT ELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES ANO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-01, O2, 03, 04, and 18 A. Recitals (i) California Government Code Section 56864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature find and declares that: (a) The lack of ce rfa inty in the approval of Development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least ecouem is cost to the public. (b) Assurance to the applicant for a Development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the p ru je~_L in a~~u rda~n;e with ex iSLing pulic ies, ru ies and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private arhir inarinn , ,-ahcnc i~~> nla nn inn and ro do ra rhn orn nnm,r costs o~f Development°, (ii) California Government Code Section 56865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any tiLy may en Ler inlu a Development Ag reeire nt with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the Development of such property as provided in this article . (iii; California Government Code Sec tiun 56365,2 provides, in part, as follows: "A Jrv elopme nt Agreement shall specify the duration of the Ag rcemc nt, the pe rmit teu uses of the property, the density of intensity of ~re se rv a^k ion ~or ~J ~d ed isan on of~la ndV~for public Vpu rpose s. a The Oev elopme nt Ag re eiae nt .nay include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for s~.rh sr quent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, re s'.r ir. do ns, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent Dev slopme nC of the land for the uses and to the density of in to nsi ty of Uevc1 opine nt set forth in the Agreement . ,~ ~ lT Ordinance No. 401 Page 2 (iv) "Attached to this ordinance, marked as Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by this reference, is proposed Development Agreement 89-03 concerning that property located at the southwest corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues, and as legaily described in the attached Development Ag re erne nt. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, that Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1" is referred to as the Development Agreement" (v) Concurrent with this Ordinance approving this Development Agreement, the City Ccu nc it has adopted an Ordinance approving Development District Pmendme nt 89-02 for the purpose of pre-zoning the property to Low Density Residential (2-4dwe 11 ing units per acre). (vi) On July 26, 1989, the Planning Co mnission of the City of Rancho Cucaw nga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the application aM concluded said hearing on that Ja to and recortmend ed approval. ;vii) Cn August 16, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing co nce rn in9 the application. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance 'nave occurred. 8. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and _,-~ SECTION 2: In conjunction with this Development Agreement, an Environmental Assessment, in conformity with the requireme r.ts of the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared. The Commission has determined that this project 'would not have a significant adverse effect on the env ironme ni, and hereby adup LS a finding of no significant impact on the environment and issues a~Nega tive Declaration. SECTION 3: based upon substantial evidence presented during the above referenced public hearings on July 2G, 1989 and August 16, 1989, i oc lad in9 written and oral staff reports, together with public to stiinony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a; i'ne subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the .IJLll t~l'd DCVVIVLIIF iIt ~~ ^f v~..... ~. nd compatibility with existing~~l4a nd use ~~in the ~surrou nd ing~area; and c1~~ Ordinance No. 401 Page 3 (b) The proposed Development District pre-zone would not have significant adverse impacts on the anv ironment, nor the surrounding properties; and (c) The proposed Development Oi strict Pre-Zone is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 4: This Council specifically finds that: !al The teca±;eo design, and nrn posed uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing Development in the vicinity. (b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan o` the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 5: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 6: This Council approves the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1" SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause Lhe same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a new sp oper of general circulation published in the City of On to no, Calt fo rn ia, and circu is ted in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ' ~f-~ ~~ RECORDING REQUESTED BY AIO WHEN RECORDED IMIL T0: Debra J. Adams City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Califo rota 91130 OEYEl.0P1E1PT A6REEMFAT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the thirty-first day following final adoption of the ordinance approving 1t (hereinafter, the "Effective Cate") by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City" hereinafter) and Homestead Land Development (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"). NITNESSETH: A. Recitals. (i) California Government Cade Section 65864 provides as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: "(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result 1n a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the consumer, and discourage investment 1n and commitment to comprehensive planning which weutd make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. -1- <~3a 7 °(b) .' Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to condi tT ons of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage prT vote participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides in pertinent part as follows; "Any city, may enter Into a development agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article. ." follows: (111) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides as "A development agreement shall specify the duration of rho agrawronf., fhP no~wltt~A aces of the orooerty. the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The development agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary action, provided that such conditions, termis, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent dlscre4fonary actions shall not prevent development of land for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the agreement. The agreement may prn yi, do roar rnnctni~tinn Shai7 he rnm~en{arj yi,thin a specified time and that the project or any phase thereof be completed within a specified t1me." -2 - ~ c~ ~ (iv) Developer owns fee title in and to that real property consisting of approximately 25 acres in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County now proposed for annexation to City. Said property is legally desc rl bed in the legal description Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereinafter is referred to as "the Sf to". (v) City's General Plan Designation for the Site is Low Density Residential i Mo to four dwei ling units per acre). Developer and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement specific development criteria to be applicable to the Site upon its annexation to City which will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the Site in accordance with sound planning principles. (vt) This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of Article 2.5 of Chapter 4, Title 7 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 65864 thereof. (vii) City has determined that the use and intensity of use provided in this Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan. h:u {1 ae na n~ of ~h. nmr~ee of annnnv/nn hh{~ an roa,wnf rliv ha< undertaken, pursuant to the Callfcrnta Environmental'Quallty~Act ("CEQA"), the required analysis of the environmental effects whlth would be caused by the agreement and adopted a resolution documenting compliance with CEOA. (1x) As further consideration for the assurances Drovlded by this Agreement to Developer that Developer will not be prevented from developing the Property, City has requested that Developer provide, and is willing to provide, certain additional sums and agreements to construct and transfer to the public certain additional improvements. B, regiment. NON, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 3- ~~ ~ 7 1. zoning/Pre-Zoning Designations. The parties hereby agree that City's zoning and premni ng designation for the S1 to hereby Ts deemed to be Low Residential (L! District subject to the specs flc terms and provisions hereof which shall supersede conflicting standards and requirements of the Low Residential (Ll District so long as this agreement is in full force and effect. 2, ream oe the Agreement. The term of the Agreement shall commence on the effective date and shall expire on December 31, 1997, so long as Development remains 1n material compliance with this Agreement, as from time to time amended. 3. Standards and Conditions. The following development standards and conditions shall govern the development of the Site during the term hereof, sub,lect to the Drovisions of paragraph 1 herelnabove: A. City Shall allow the Site to be developed to a density of, not greater than, the Tract Mep (TT 13835}, approved by San Bernardino County, December 19, 1988. Development of the tract shall be in conformance with the Ct tv standards of the Low Residential (L1 District or as modified by the County Conditions of Approval. 8. If required by City as a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall consent to the application of the Mello-Roos Fac111ttes Act of 1982, the Mm1d pal Improvement Pct of 1911, the Municipal iagrovement P,ct of 1913, the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, the Landscaping and Lighting act of 1972, and any and all other available proceedings to provide for public conduit financing for the construction of public improvements required as a condition to develapaent of the Site or any uortl on o, uu rtiuris therv!oP. -q- ~~ 3 0 C. In lieu of the dedication of land located within the S1te, Developer shall pay City's park fees required due to the residential development of the Site. Said park fees shall be calculated in accordance with standards in effect at the time any such fees are due and owing or subject to subparagraph D. Said park fees shall be pa ya6le for a lot contained within a final tract prior to the City release of utilities for occupancy of that lot for residential use. D. Subject to subparagraphs 2.E and F herei nbelow, Developer shill pay any and all City fees required as a result of development of the Site, or any portion or portions thereof, at rates current at the time payable, including, but not limited to, beautification fees, park fees, systems development fees, building permit fees, and plan check fees. Not withstanding the foregoing, the current fee schedule attached as Exhibit "D" shall be in effect for the period of twelve (12) months from the approval date of City Council of this Development Agreement and thereafter all fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at that time. E. No drainage fees are required. Regional drainage would be as conditioned by the County with any drainage lines needed being installed by the Developer. F. Developer may request and City shall extend ~to Developer credit against required systems development fees only to the extent of Developer's direct construction costs incurred in constructing oversized facilities (i .e., facilities sized to service areas located outside of the site) which are not located within the Site, or abutting the Site. Pr1or to recordation, the Developer shall contribute his fair share toward the future signal izat ion of Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue. His fair share is estimated as 514,400.00 based on a traffic report submitted by the Developer's Traffic Engineer. See Page 7 of the County Co nd ittons of Approval. -5- G. Developer shall consent to the creation of an assessment district or districts to provide for the construction and nwintenarKe of any and all lighting and landscaping within public rights-of -way within the Site or abutting the S1 to pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Pct of 1972 or, if applicable, Developer shall consent to an annexation or annexations of the Site or any portion or portions thereof to an existing assessment district formulated under said !kt for that purpose. H. If required by City as a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall consent to the application of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982 thereto, or Developer contribution of equivalent funds, to construct regional drainage facilities. I. Development of the tract shall be Tn conformance with the requirements of the City Development Code Exhibit "E" Architectural and Design Guidelines, and the County Conditions of Approval and shall proceed through the standard City design review process. J. Developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. K. Developer shall provide street improvements as set forth in Exhibit "C" Supplement to County Conditions of Approval for Tract 13835 regarding street improvements of Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue. L. Developer shall consent to the annexation to the Community Fact titles District 88-2 in order to provide for continuous law enforcement services for the protect. M. As determined by the affected school districts, 1n regards to school student population impacts, Uie applicant shalt consent to, or partid pale in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Conmunity Facilities District pertaining to the protect site to provide in coN unction with the -5- c;l applicable School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities Drior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. However, 1f any khoal District has previously established such a Community Fati li ti es District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the pro,j ect site Into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whl ch ever comes first. Further, it the affected khool District has not formed a Nello- Roas Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. N. Developer will provide each buyer with a detailed disclosure statement of all taxes and assessments on the property. $a14 d15c1osurM statement shall first be approved by the City Planner. D. Developer shall comply to all Conditions of Approval set forth December 19, 1988 by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors for Tract 13835 (see Exhibit "8"). 4. ApDticabtitty of Ctty Ordinances. Except as expressly modified herein, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained in City's ordinances, specific plans, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, its Development Code, building code, electrical code, fire code and plumbing code, as amended, shall apply to the development of the Site pursuant to this Development Agreement. Further, any terms or phrases contained hereto for which there are definitions provided to City's said Development Code shall be deemed to be utilized in accardarrce with those u'efi nl lions. _)_ ~>33 5. Rel ati onshTp of Parties. IC 15 understood that the contractual relationship between City and Developer is such that Developer is an independent party and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever and shall not be considered to be the agent of CT ty for any purpose whatsoever. 6, General Condi tt ons. The pa rtT es further agree as follows: A. Except as expressly set forth t^. this Agreement, ne representations of any kind or character have been made to one another by any of the parties hereto or Dy any of the parties' agents, representatives, associates or attorneys with respect to each subd ect to which this Agreement relates. B. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to each subject to which it relates. C. This Agreement can only be amended In writing, which writing must first be executed by all of the parties hereto. D. No provision of this Agreement may be waived, except in writing. which wrTtina must be executed Dv all of the oarties hereto. E. The Darttes hereto each agree that they shall execute and deliver to the other, upon request so to do, any and all documents reasonable and necessary to accomplish or evidence the agreements contained in or contemplated by this Agreement. F. In the event that any party should default Tn one or more of its obligations provided 1n or contemplated by this Agreement, the defaulting party shall pay to the other all expenses Incurred in connection with efforts Eo anfiirC:i. Kuzh @bif ea tiga; inel tiding rag sonaDle attorneys' fees and costs, whether or not suit be commenced. -B- C ; L/ 7 D, Thts Agreement, all other documents and agreements provided in or contemplated hereby, and all rights and obligations arising therefrom shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, representatives, successors and assigns. 7. Indeimification. Developer agrees to, and shall, hold Ctty and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from liability for damage or clot ms for damage for personal tnt uries, tncludi ng death, and claims for property damage wht ch may arise from construction operations of Developer or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, eagloyee or other person acting on his behalf which relate to the construction and operation of the Protect, excluding claims made from inturies or damages to, or occurring on, public property. Developer agues to, and shall, defend City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer's activities 1n connection with the Protect, excluding ciatms made from inturtes or damages to, or occurring on, public property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, spectfl cations or other documents for the Protect. 8. Assignment. Developer shall have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign or transfer all or any portion of this Site (as may 6e subsequently subdivided), to any person or entity at any time during the term of this Developxnt Agreement. My such transfer shall 6e deemed to include an assignment of all rights, duties and obllgatlons created by this Development Agreement with respect to all or any portion of the Site. The assumption of any or all of the obllgatlons of Developer under this Agreement pursuant to any such transfer shall relieve Developer, without any act or inn{il Ranrn ny the City, of its legal duty to Cortorm those obligations except to the extent that Developer is to default with respect to any and all obligations at the time of the proposed transfer. -g- ~- ~ .~ 9. Aa>endments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California Government Code Sections 65868 et seq. 10. Minor Amendments to Development Plan. Upon the written application of Developer, minor modifications and changes to the Development Plan may be approved by the City Planner pursuant to the terms of Section 1i.02.070A i"Minor Revisions--Administrative"1 of City's Development Code and substantial changes to the site may be approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to the terms of Section 17.06.010 (Design/Development Reviewl. 11. Enforcement. ?n the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer, Ctty shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) by registered or certified mail addressed at the address stated in this Agreement, and 1f such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within sixty (60) days after such notice is given, or i'.f not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within sixty (601 days iprovided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within said sixty (60) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by °CE Q~•......1 ~~. ~.. r1 ~.. w ui Mw_~• s~_nN,.w nnN nn Aala.e dal uil• mA.n this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, Ctty may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation o4 this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for 1n,~unctive relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. 12. Event of Default. Developer is to default under this Agreement upon the happening of one ar more of the following events or conditions: -10- ~~ ~ 6 a. I£ a mated al warranty, representation or statement 15 made or furnished by Developer to City and is false or proved to have been false in any material respect when it was made; D. if a finding and Bete rmi naticn is made by City following an annual review pursuant to paragraph 14 hereinbelcw, upon the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not compiled in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and ooportunityto cure as desc ri hed in paragraph 11 herei naDOVe; or c. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided 1n paragraph it heretnabove. 13. No Maiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Developer if on periodic review Ctty does not enforce this Agreement. Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third mn~y n. nn hiW nhhan •h an Nfu all Mhnn naaa~M ua a1 1a,a nn In onnl by which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there 1s a breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 14. Mnual Review. During the terra of this Development Agreement, City shall annually rcvlew the extent of good faith compliance by Developer with the terns of this Development Agreement. Developer shall file an annual nnn xi t^ ~iw i.,M Cato^^ ~nfDr..ati on " d~"^ tCm^'!an.Ce with the terms Df .np_. ..~ ~.~ erir ~~y r• this Development Agreement no later than July 15 of each calendar year. -11- r J If as a result of such annual review, City finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied in good faith with any of the terms of conditions of this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement. I5. Covenants Run with the Land. A11 of the Drovi sions, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon Ghe parties and lwheir respective heirs, successors (by merger, consols data on, or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, a6ntnlstrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring any rights or interests in the Property, or any portion thereof, whether by operation of law or to any manner whatsoever and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable law. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act on the Property hereunder (A1 1s for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of Property, (B) runs with such lands and (C) is Dinding upon each party and each successive owner during its ownership of such properties or any portion thereof, and each person having any Interest therein derived 1n any manner through any owner of such lands. or env portion thereof, and shall benefit each party and its lands hereunder, and each other person succeeding to an interest in such lands. NoMithstanding any of the foregoing or in this Agreement to the contrary, any assignee or transferee or mortgagee which acquires any right or interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof shall take and hold such rights and interests subJect to this Agreement and shall not have been deemed to have assumed the Developer's obligations or the other affirmative duties and obllgatlons of Developer hereunder except: (i ~ fo isle a.tont Phgf any of turh asst gflMQ, transferees or mortgages have expressly assumed any of the duties or obllgatlons of Developer hereunder; -12- ~> °3 k (11) if any such assignee, transferee or mortgage accepts, holds, or attempts to exercise or enjoy the rights or interests of Developer hereunder, it shall have assumed the obit gatlons of Developer; and (1ti) to the extent that the performance of any duty or obligation by Developer is a condition to the performance of a covenant by Developer, '.t shall continue to be a condition to Developer's performanre hereunder. 16. tbrtgage Protection. This Agreement shall be superior and senior to any lien placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof, including the 11 en of any mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach hereof shall defeat, render invalid, di minish or impair the lien of any mortgage made in good faith and for value and any acquisition or acceptance of title or any right or interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof;, by a mortgage (whether under or pursuant to a mortgage, foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in iTeu of foreclosure, or othenvtse), shall be subject to all of the ternn and condtttons contained in this Agreement. No mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform Developer's affirmative covenants of Developer hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; except that to the extent that any covenant to be performed is a condition to the performance of a covenant by City, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to City's performance hereunder. Each mortgagee ~shail have the right (but not the obligation) for a period of ninety (90) days after the receipt of such notice from City to cure or remedy, the claim of default or noncompjtance set forth in the Ctty's notice. If the default is of a nature which can only be remedied or cured by such mortgagee upon abtatning possession, such mortgagee shall seek to obtain 03i5e5iivn with diiic_ence and continuity throuoh foreclosure, a recotver cr otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy ar cure the default or noncompliance within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or noncompliance cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be 13- <,) ~ c7 reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such default or nonco~itance if such mortgagee commences cure during such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such cure. 17. Nott ce. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by certlfted mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later sped f'.ed by the parties hereto. To Developer: Homestead Land Development 23470 011vewood Plaza Drive, Suite 240 tbreno lmiley, Callfornla 92388 Attn: Stephen L. Hetnsohn To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Attn: Jack Lam, Ctty Manager 18. Recording. In attordance with California Government Code Section 65868.5, a certlfted copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder of San Bernardino County, Callfornla, immediately upon this Agreement becoming effective. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the effective date of the ordinance approving this Agreement. ~-14- yd ctTV of RANONO cucnNDNCe Dated: 9y yor Dated: Dated: By -15- ~~ y er DNNER: HOMEAEAD LAND DEVELOPMENT By .9,e,.o~.,~.~.o,. lOCAI. af.PIIN 9new~TTnY [ T CTnS a,~u+a,io __;/~ LOCKWOOD EN8INEERINO city of Rancho Cucamonga (Affected Agancy)a~ 3/13/89 b SURYEYINB COMPANY, INC. rp,,,.ti,,,, p,,,,,, .,,,,,, t, ~. ~~~~~ ~~ ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION nimte. CWfgny 997a ooo~ien nu.aa 9101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All chat portion of the Naat 1/2 of the Eaat 1/2 of Che SoutMaat I/4 of Section 30, T. 9. R. 6 N, S.B.B. S M. being more particularly ducribed as follova: Beginning at the Northvale corner of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1!4 of the Scut.`.east :/4 of said Sact ion 30; Thence S 89.75'04" E along the North lino of said South I/2, South 1/2,Northeaat 1/4, Southuat 1/4 a diataene of 660.00 fu[; Thrace S 0.02'02" N a distance of 329.87 fut to tM South Lina of as id Northeast 1/4, Southuat 1/4 Section 30; Thence 8 89.35' 21" E along the acid lino a diatance of 2.91 feet co the Nerthust corner of the Nut 1/2, Southuat 1/4, Southmut 1/4 of said Section 30; Theca S 0.04'02" N along the said East line of the Nut 1/2, Southaut 1/4, Southuat 1/4 of Section 30 a diatance of 1391.48 fut [e the South line of said Section 30 being the ulsting Rancho Cucamonga city limit Line; Thence N 89.36'09" N along the said South line a diatance of 662.15 feet to the Southuat comer of acid Southaut L/4, Southuat 1/4, Section 30; Theca N 0. 02'02" E along the said Nut lino ofthe East 1/2, Southuat l/6 Section 30 a distance of 1649.55 feat to the true point at beglning ~~~ ~~ J-i 3•-d9 No.910t B0. 11119! TT i 3teJS ANNEXATION 89-03 EXFREIIT •Ae LAND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT cmoR, 393 Nonn Amow~EE9 AyARU~ . 9An 9irnwtllno. CA 9N1a~0190 • ptq ]a7AYM 1 January 20, :989 Expires: December 19, 1991 Jeff Blackmon Lockwood Engineering s 93ackmon Homes Surveying Co., Znc. ?.O. Box 5269 P.O. Box 796 Riverside, CA 52517 Rialto, CA 92376 RE: 745W /La9004251DC01 W199-62 745WVLB9004251TT01 TR 13875 Dear Sirs: COUNTY Of SAN 9EPNAROING ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WOR93 AGENCY JOHN N. JAOUE99 Und M+np~m+m Oincior OFFICE Of oLANNING Snaron W Hpnrowo County T+mm~9 Gllicn OFFICE OF SURVEYOR C;+VOA D. TOTImaOn. L5. CoumV Survryor OFFICE Of BUILDING ANO SAFE T` Lurv L, Sc~oalko0l. v E. County 9uJmnq Oaime This will advise you that after completion of the environmental review process, and due consideration thereot, the above-retarencad project was conditionally approvnd by the County Board of SupeF- visors at its meeting of December 19, 1988. Said prof act was found to be in compliance with County policies and regulations and was approved subject to the conditions as sat to rth on attached pages 1 of 15 through, 15 of 15. in accordance with the San Bernardino County Development Code, Section 84.0205(1), all requirements specified on the attached sheets shall be met within thSrty-.iv r~Al ,nr,r •~.. .~«.~ «E.~ r,«„ of this Latter, or the Conditional Approval is void. one (1) extension of time not to exceed three (7) years may be granted. A written request must be submitted, with the appropriate fen, to the Public Inlormation Counter at the address above, prior to the date of expiration. PLEASE NOTE: This will be the only notice given for the above specified expiration date. The applicant is responsible for initiatlnq extension requests. Sincar ely, EPWA/LAND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF PLANNING ~~o~~ TERRI RAHHAL, Associate Planner West Valley Planning Team cc: Surveyor/Land Dev. Division Env iranmental Health Svcs. 9uildinq and Safety cc: County Special Districts County Fire warden County sheriff TR:rb ANNEXATION AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B' 3LACXMON HOMES PAGE 1 OF :5 SLB/a7-110/W119-62/TR 1]875 Conditions of Approval .2-19'88 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All lots shall have a minimum area of 7,200 square feet, a minimum depth of one hundred (100) feat and a minimum width of 60 feet, (70 feeC on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de-sac or on a curved street where the side Lot lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than sixty (60) Pest measured at the building setback line as delineated on the composite development plan. 2. Where lots occur on the hulb of a cul-da-sac, a minimum lot depth of ninety (90) feat will be permitted. Lf the proposed depth is less than ninety (90) feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth. 7. Roads within this development shall be entered into the County Maintained Road System. a, The water purveyor shall be Cucamonga County Water District. 5. sewage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga county Water District. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAp: O ~rICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETY ~ n. ,.,,,,_i__ry __il :a~;„~t, ~wwpiying witn tna provisions of o:dinanca 281St/ shall be tiled with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map. 7. A geology report, prnpared by a licensed geoloq ist, shall be filed with and approved by the Building Oftieial prior to recordation. A deposit to cover the coats of the review shall be submitted with the report. An additional deposit may b• required or a refund issued when the costs do not match the deposit. The review costs shall ba paid in full prior to recordation of the final map. DEPARTMENT OP ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 8. The following are th• stepe that must be completed tc meet the cequiremants for Lnstallat ion and/or tinane• of the on-site/off-alt• water system and/or sewer system: ~ ?rON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) •*ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES BLACFMON HOMES 2AGE 2 OF i5 SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 1]8]5 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 Where the system is to be installed prior to recordation: The water system, fire hydrants, and/or sewer system shall b• installed in accordance with requirements of the state Health and Safety Code, and in accordance with plans approved by the water and/or sawering utility and the govern inq fire protection authority. The plans shall be reviewed by a Civil Enginear,registerad in the Stat• of California, and contain required certificates and approval signatures. It is the developer's responsi- bility to submit to the OFFIC°_ ^r SL'4"OY^R ~~~- DEVELOPHENT SECTION, a copy of the approved plan and a signed statement from the utility of jurisdiction confirming that the improvement has been installed and accepted. B. Where a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the imprc•~ement: The domestic water plan and/or sower plan which meets th• requirements of th• Stat• Health and Safety Code shall be reviewed by a Civil Engineer, registered in the Siat• at California, and approved by the water or sawering utility and the governing f ir• protection authority. Th• plans shall contain th• required cartif icatas and approval signatures. A copy of the approved plan shall be submitted to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR *=ND DEC^'~~ MENT SECTION. Said onaineor aF.ii a.«._~_,-- . ~ u11 .. Vl VVllll necessary to install the improvements .v a. This amount plus tan percent shall be posted with the County of San 8srnardino. A statement signad by th• engineer stating that the amount oL bond recommended is adequate to cover th• cost of installation o! the improvement shall b• included with th• estimate and eubmittad to th• OFFICE OF et RV vno *nwn DEVELOPMENT SECTION. o. or, in case^ where the water agency or ~awarlnq agency is a governmental subdivision, Lha bond in the amount of 110 percent of the ^ost of inataiioElon ci the improvement may 6• placed with the agency. A signad statement from that agency stating that financial " NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) ""ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES 9LACi4dON HOMES PAGE 7 OF 13 SUH/8~-110/Wi19-62/TR 17?75 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 arrangements have been completed shall be submitted to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR, i.AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION. Frior to release of the bond for the improvement, the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed statement confirming that the improvement has been installed and meets the requirements of all appropriate State and County laws pertaining to such improvement. It is the developer's responsi- bility that such signed statement is filed with the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR AND DEVELOPMENT SE_CTI04. •+9. An acoustical studg shall be performed to assess noise levels at the development and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Environmental Health Services prior to recordation. Prior to issuance of building permits a report stating that the recommended mitigation measures have been implemented shall be submitted to the Department of Environ- mental Health Services. COUNTY FIRE AGENCY io. The dnvelopment and each phaa• thereo! shall have two points oL vehicular access Lor fire and other emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Coda. 11. Water systems designed to moat the required fire flow of this development shall be approved by the Fire Agency, Tha - c_cp~r :all Iuauiai~ the Tire Agency with two copies of the ,water~syetem improvement plans Lor signature and a letter from the WateY Purveyor statlnq the availability of the required lire flow prior to recordation. Water systems shall be operational and approved by th• Fire Agency or bonded for prior to recordation. Prior to any above grade construction occurring, water for tiro protection shall be operational and approved by th• FLr• Agency. 12. Six (6") inch mains shall be required. +17. Due to th• project being in high hazard terrain, hydrants must be spaced at 400 toot intervals. +1a. Duo to the project halo? blab hazard terrain; rho ?ire flow shall be a minimum of 1500 gallons poi minute. NOTE: Hydrant spacing may be increased and lira flow reduced, + NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) +~ENVZRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES •LACKMON HOMES PAGE 4 OF 15 SOB/87-110/W119-62/TR 1]8]5 Conditions of Approval 12-19-08 shoul d-the developer decide to install automatic fire sprinklers in all the residences. ••15. Developer shall commence, participate in and consummate, cr cause to bs commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Me11o-Roos Community Facilities Distriot Por Foothill Fira Protection District, to finance a fire station to serve the development, including land facilities, equipment and operations and maintenance. The station shall be located, designed and built to all specifications of the Foothill Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The aqu ipment shall ba selected by the District in accordance with its needs. in any building of the station, Developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by District and Developer by the time of recordation of the final map. OFFICE OF SUR`/EYOR :AND CEVELO~,NT/DRAINAGE SECTION 16. Flowage easements or San Bernardino County Drainage Easements shall be obtained where diversion or concentration of runolf from the site or drainage facilities dewaters onto private property. 17. Adequate rolls shall be provided on the entrance reads to the site at Rochester to minimize the possibility of street flow entering the site. a n.+c...._«_ __._. _. _.. ~;,nii b^ maae co lntarca t and conduct the o!f-site tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely of tact adjacent or downstream properties. i9. Adequate San Bernardino County Drainage Easements (minimum 15 feat wide) shall b• provided over the natural drainage courses and/or drainage facilities. The easements shall ba designed to contain the 100-year frequency storm flow plus bulking and freeboard per County Standard Criteria. 20. in addition to the Drainage Requirements stated herein, other "on-site°or "oft-site" improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed otter mere complete imnravemenc plar;s and proriiee have been submitted to this olfice. • NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) •+ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES BLACiQQON HOMES PAGE 5 OF 15 SUB/87-i10/Wli9-62/TR 17835 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 *20a. Added by 9.0.5 '_2-i3-88 *21 *22. The developer's engineer shall obtain or provide c*.e necessary engineering information to forward to FEMA in order to have the site removed Prom the flood plain. This information shall consist of copies of the plans of flood facilities now under construction, and the hydrologic/hydraulic calculations put into the format acceptable to FEMA (Hec i, 2). *z3. Tha applicant shall contribute his fair share to the Day Creak Channel Project. The amount shall be determined by the Flood Control District, based on acreage. *23a. Th• tract shall not 6• released for occu anc until Phasn ,dried by 8.0.5. a Day Cra• C anne s comp a • an opera one 2-19-88 O FFZCE OF SURVEYOR LAND DEVELOPMENT/ROAD ~F~'TIOl• 24. Road sections within and/or bordering the tract shall be ,ase~~-tea -. _ ' ----""-"' Vaiiay nvad acanaaras and west Valley Foothills Community VPlan standards of San Bernardino county, and to the policies and requirements of the county Transportation and Flood Control Department in accordance with th• Master Plan of Highways. zs. Any grading within the road right-of-way prior to the signing of the ~improvament plena shall be accomplished under the direction of a Soils Testing Engineer. Compaction tests of embankment conetructlon, trench backl111, and all subgradas shall be performed at no cost to San Bernardino County and a written report shall b• submitted to the Contracts Division o! the Transportation and Flood Control Department, prior to any placement o! baa• metarlala and/or paving. -" • Final plane and profiiea shall inaicat• the location of any existing utility facility which would affect construction. * NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) *~ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES Approval shall ba obtained from the San Bernardino County Flcod Control District that the site is adequately protected from the 100-year design storm in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations and the county Development Code, BLACKMON HOMES 2AGE 6 Or i5 SL'B/87-110/W119-62/TR 17875 conditions of Approval 12-19-88 27. Slope rights shall ba dedicated on the final tract map where necessary. 23, A thorough evaluation of the structural road section, to include parkway improvements, from a qualified materials engineer, shall ba submitted to the Transportation and FLood Control ^epartment. 29. °xistinq County roads which will require reconstruction shall remain open for traffic at all times, with adequate det rs, ,.,.ring ac,.ual --nst- - -- cos; deposit steal bz made-to cover the cost oP gradinq~and paving prior to recorda- tion of the tract map. L'pon completion of the grading and paving to the satisfaction of the ^. ransportat ion and Flood Control Department, the cash deposit may be refunded. 70. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated on Highland Avenua, Future State Highway 70, Rochester Avenue, Vintage Drive, and along the rear oP double frortage lots. •31. Future State Highway 70 right, oL way, including any irterehanges or grade separations, shall be reserved along the prof eet Lrontaqn and shown on the map as par the Cal Trans letter of August 19, 1988. 72. All road names shall be coordinated with the County Transpor- tation and Flood Control Department, Traffic Division. 33. Road improvement plane Lor Highland Avenue-State Highway JD shall be submitted to the State Department of Transportation Ly a aayinlu au ~:ivii rry inNr. 3G. Dedication shall b• granted on Highland Avnnun-State Highway 30 as necessary to concur with the Master Plan of Highways. This dedication is to be coordinated with the State Department of Transportation. 75. An approved type wall or barrier shall b• rsqulred along the rear of double !rootage lots, and shall 6e constrvcted outside of public right-of-way. 36. All required road and drainage improvements shall be bonded in accordanc• with the County Development Code, unless constructed and approved prior to recordation o! the F1na1 Map. 37. Turn around^ at dead and streets shall be in accordanc• with the requirements of th• County Transportation and Flood • NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) ~+~ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES ~,,.. r ~~ c~; B UCiQ30N HOMES PAGE 6 C? i5 SUH/87-110/W119-62/TR 17875 conditions of Approval 12-19-88 27. Slepe right9 shall ba dedicated on the final tract map where necessary. 29. A thorough evaluation of the structural road section, to include parkway improvements, from a qualified materials engineer, shall be submitted to the Transportation and Flood Control Department. 29. Existing County roads which will require reconstruction shall remain open £or traffic at all times, with adequate detours, during actual construction. A cash danosit s..*.all to made to cover the cost of grading and pavirq prior to recorda- tion of the tract map. Cpon completion of the grading and paving to the satistaction of the Transportation and Flood Control Department, the cash deposit may be refunded. 30, vehicular access rights shall be dedicated on Highland Avenue, Future State Highway 70, Rochester Avenue, Vintage Drive, and along the rear of double frontage lots. +31. Future State Highway 70 right, of way, including any interchanges or grade separations, shall b• resnrved along the project irentage and shown on the map as par the Cal Trans letter of August 18, 1988. 32. All road names shall be coordinated with the County Transpor- tation and Flood Control Department, Tratfic Division. 37. Road improvement plans for Highland Avenue-State Highway 70 shall be submitted to the Stat• Department of Transportation by a regiatarsd civil engineer. 34. Dedication shall be granted on Highland Avenue-State Highway 3D as necessary to concur with th• Mastor Plan of Highways. This dedication is to be coordinated with the State Department of Transportation. 35. An approved type wall or barrier shell be required along the rear of double frontage lots, and shall be constructed outside of public right-of-way. 76. All required road and drainage improvements shall be bonded in aceordanc• with the County Development Cade, unless constructed and approved prior to recordation of the Final Map. :-. Turn a::~unds ae doad end streets shall b• in aceordanc• with the requirements of the County Transportation and Flood + NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) ++ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES SLACF(MON HOMES ?AGE ~ CF 13 SL'H/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835 conditions of Approval 12-19-88 Control'Department, and the Forestry and Fire warden Depart- ment. 38. Existing utility poles shall be shown on the improvement plans and relocated as necessary without cost to the County. 39. T..*.e developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests and i! he or she should Pail to do so, the developer shall at least 12o days prior to submittal oP the final map, enter into an agreement to complete the imp rovaments pursuant to Government Code Section 55452 at such lima as County aequira9 the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by developer of all costs incurred by ccunty to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security Lor a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have bean approved by County prior Co commencement of the appraisal. 40. Right-of-way and improvements '(including otL-site) to transition traffic and drainaq• flows from proposed to existing, shall be required as necessary. al. Trees, irrigation systems, landscaping required to be installed on public right of way within this tract area shall be maintained by other than the County Transporta- tion/Flood Control Deportment, and shall b• as specified in County Transportation/Flood Control eta ndarda for tree planting. Maintenance procedures acceptable to m.a ~a^^r«_- "_cn'F:cod ~.v,~i.cwi uepartmant shall b• instituted prior to recordation. *«42. Prior to recordation, the applicant shall contribute his fair share toward the suture signal izatlon of Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue. His Lair share is estimated as $14,400.00 based on a Trattic Report submitted by th• applicant's Traffic Enginga. OFFICE OF PLANNING 43. Commitment shall b• obtained, in writing, from th• sewerinq agency. Said commitment shall lndicat• that the agency has the capacity to furnisri sewer servie• to the subject project, and that all necessary arrargements ha~• k±aenmadn with the agency to supply such services. A copy o! the commitment shall ba filed with th• Office o! Planning. * NON-STANDARD CONDZTSON(S) *~ENVZRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES BLACHMON HOMES PAGE a OF 15 SUB/87-11C/W119-62/TR 13834 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 44. Developer shall provide for street lighting within the tract as follows: A. Low intensity, energy-efficient street lights at all intersections; 3. Install underground conduit with a pull cord (for future installation of additional lights) through the tract; C. Deposit monies with the Special Districts Department to cover all installation and connection c..*.a rges for additional street lights per adopted County policy regarding light pol• spacing and Location. D. Prior to recordation, the tract shall be annexed to the appropriate district to provide street light maintenance. :4. Subdivider shall present evidence to the County Surveyor's Office that he has tried to obtain a non-i rterLerence letter from any utility company that may have rights of easement within the property boundaries. 46. Easements o! record not shown on the tentative map shall be relinquished or relocated. Lots off ectad by propoaad easements or easemanta of record which cannot b• relinquished or relocated, shall be redesigned. 47. The following build i..^.g setback pries shall bs delineated on the composite development plan: A. A variable front yard bnitritnn =.«*±^_!: 'i:t c. at loo~~ 22 feat and averaging at least 24 feet. B. A sid• yard building setback line oL at least 15 feet adjacent to aide streets on corner lots. 49. Fcur (4) copies of a Landscaping Plan shall b• submitted Cor Office o! Planning review and approval. Said Landacap• Plan shall include the following: A. The required slope planting. slops planting shall ba required Lor th• aurtace of ali cut slopes more than fiw (S) fact in height and till alopu more than three (3) fact !n height. Said slopes shall be protected against damaq• by erosion by piantinq with grans or ~r6wnd cover plants. Slopoa sxceading fifteen (15) !ut in vortical height shall also ba planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten (10) feet on contarsr or +NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) +"ENVIRONMENTAL MYTIGATTVE M£ASUAES BL1CiQ30N HOMES PAGE 9 OF i9 SL'9/87-11G/W719-62/TR 17875 Conditions of Approval 12-19-e6 t raea/ spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site. Trees l0i 15 gal.; 40k 5 gal.; 50t 1 gal. Shrubs 20i 5 gal.; 60t 1 gal.; Groundcover 100! coverage. 3. T.`.e regt:ire3 street trees. C. A11 required walls. All decorative walls shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, split block face, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. D. Any existing trees to remain on site. Any existing eucalyptus trees to b• retained shall be topped to thirty (00) teat, trimmed along the lower tittesn (15) feet, and cleared of all dead leaves and branches. Afy, Revised by 9.0.5. 1z-19-ee ~e. 49. Four (d) copies of an irrigation plan shall ba submitted for ottic• of Planning review and approval when slope planting is required. Slopes required to b• planted shall b• provided with an aFFroved eyatem Qt irrigation, a~signad t4 Dover all portions of the slopes. A functional tact of th• system may ba required. Tha maintananc• of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall b• the responsibility of the developer until the ~ ttON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) *+ENVIRO NMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES JMCKMON HOMES 2AGc 10 OF 15 SUH/87-110/W119-62/TR 17875 Conditions of Approval 12'19-8H transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenancn is officially assumed by a County Service Area. All irriga- tion systems, where requ irad, shall be designed on an individual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an approved manner. S0. A minimum number oP one (1) inch caliper/15 gallon, multi-branched trees shall ba planted on the lot adjacent to the street right-of-way for each of the following types of Lots: A. Cul-de-sac lot - 1 tree; 3. Interior lot - 2 trees; C. Ccrner lot - 3 trees. Thn variety oP tree to be provided is subj eet to County approval and to 6e maintained by the property owner. 'ded by e. -19-88 u'M by a 1°.-dB ded by 8.0.5. -19-89 ~51d. Prior to recordation, an annaxat '2d by B.O.S. 19-88 ~ YON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) ~"ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASfJRES 51. All landscaping and irrigation shown on the approved landscape and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed or suitable bonds posted Por their completion. ~51c. This tract mev have to b• modlPisd to provide an extension HLACICMON HOMEB PAGE :: OF :5 SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 17875 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 PERMITS SNALL NOT H6 I880ED DNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN METz OFFICE OF HUI DIN AND HAFETY 52. For projects where grading is to be done, grading plans are to be submitted to and approved by the office oP Build inq and Safety. 53. obtain a demolition permit for any building to 6e demolished. Underground structures must be broken in, back-filled and inspected before covering. 54. Submit plans and obtain building permits Por any required walls. 55. An erosion and sediment control plan shall ba submitted far review and approval by the Building Official prior to any land disturbance botweon October 15th and April 15th. 56. A tree removal plan, permit and preconstruction inspection in compliance with the County's plant protected and management ordinance shall be approved prior to any land disturbance and/or removal of any protected trees or plants. COUNTY FIR. ADEN '~ "57. All roof inq materials used in this project shall be of a non-combustible aatarial. ~Ireated materials of a temporary nature will nat be accepted. OFFICE OF BURVEYOR +.nnu usvFL~PMENT/DR,INA ~rCTION *58. A permit shall 6e obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga far work necessary within the city streets, such as storm drain connections. OFFICE OF SURVEYOR L1ND Deys•rnpp{rNT/ROADa corTIO!' 59. An encroachment permit, or authorized clenrance, shall 6e obtained Eras the County Transportation and Flood Control Department prior to issuance of a grading permit by the office o! Building and Safety. 5^• 5n =ncraaehment permit -hall b: re quirad from the State Department of Trenaportation prior to any construction within state right-of-way. " NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) ""ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES sEACR3QON HOMES PAGE 12 OF 15 SUB/s7-110/W119-62/TR 13825 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 X61. Pxojecta subject to a building permit shall have all required on and oft-site improvements, requ irad for eech phase, completed and approved prior to final inspection of any buildings or structures. The term "phase" as used here shall :jean the loilowinq: "The block of building permits drawn on less than the whole project" or "A plan o1 building construction which indicates blocks of construction of less than the whole project". In each phase, the installation of any on or aft-site improvements shall be sufficiently completed so as to assure protection from storm or drainage run of !, a sate and 3riveabie aceasa for fire and safety, and the ordinary and intended use of the buildings or structures. Tha Building official, with the concurrence cf the OPf ice of the Surveyor, may approve any plan or approve a change to an approved plan, which complies with the intent of this policy. OFFICE OF PLANNING +62. Prior to iasuancs of building permits the developer shall provide certification from the appropriate school district as required by California Government Cod• Section 53080 (b) that any tee, charge, dedication or other loan or requirameht levied by the governing board o! the district pursuant to Government Code Section 57080(a) hms bean satisfied. 63. A final grading plan shall be required. Said grading plan shall be submitted to the Offic• o! Building and Salety for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall: ~~ -+~:~ ~w a maximum siope ratio o! 2 to L and a maximum vertical height of thirty (70) feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of elopes shall b• a minimum of one-hal! th• slope height. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contouza. B• a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots. *54. Recommended maximum heights for manufactured slope benke era 1!.st ad below. Vertical ha fight shall b• th• meeeurement between th• •levat ion of th• to• and top of th• sl op• including retaining walls. Tha natural elope for grading purpoa:e shaii be determined on a parcel by parcel basis, using th• high and low elevation of the area to b• graded. Maximum he fights shall not b• exceeded unless grading can be * NOt7-STANDARD CONDITION(S) "'ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES BLACHHON HOMES SUB/87-110/W119-63/TR 17875 PAGE 13 OF 19 Conditions at Approval 12-19-88 significantly reduced by increased height. Alternative designs that would reduce slope heights are preferred. Any bank excaading twenty-five (25) feat, regardless oP length, shall have variable gradients. A. The maximum slope height where the natural terrain is ten (lo}) percent or leas, is ten (lo) feet. B. The maximum slope height where the natural terrain is greater than ten (l0}) percent but less than or equal to Sittaen (15}) percent, is fifteen (15) feat. C. Tha maximum slope height where the natural terrain exceeds fifteen (15}) percent, is thirty (70) feet. "65. During construction, measures shall be taken to control runofL from construction sites. Filter fabric fences, heavy plastic earth covers, gravel berms or lines of straw bales are a few of the techniques which should be considered. "66. Grading shall b• phased ao that prompt revagatation or construction can control erosion. Where possible, only those areas which will later be resurfaced, landscaped or built on should b• disturbed. Rssurf acing of parking lots and roadways should take place as scan as practicable, not at the completion o! construction. 67. A copy of the final grading plan, appzovsd by Building and Safety, shall be submitted to the Office of Planning when graded out slope sxcssd five (5) feet in height and fill slopes axrt..A •~.~.. (~) t_ = is „ 9 UBJECT PRODERTY BRALL NOT HII OCCDPIED ONTIL THE FOLLONINO CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET7 COUNTY FTRn' AG N v 68. Address numerals shall ba a minimum of Lour inches in height on a contrasting background, and shall ba vislbl• from the street. Durlnq the hours of darkness they shall bs internally illuminated. (Standard No. 122). 69. Each chimney used in conjunction with nny flreplac• or eny heating appllanes Sn which solid or liquid fuel Sa used shall be maintalnad with an approved aperk arrester as idertlfiad '-^- *_-^-e '-'•^•=fo ~ FSra Ccdi (Standard Namber 171) . " NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) ""ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES 9LACXMON HOMES PAGE 14 OF 14 5279/87-11P/W119-62/TR 17875 Conditions of Approval i2-19-98 76. All required landscaping and walls, as per the approved landscape plan, shall be installed prior Co occupancy. * NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) w*ENVIRONHENTAL NITIGATI~';lEASURES Exhibit "C" Conditions of Approval Street Improvements on Rochester and Highland Avenues A. Rochester Avenue shalt be constructed full width from Highland Avenue to the north pro,lect boundary. The vertical and horizontal alignment shall conform k the City's approved street plans. including approprtak transitions to align with a mayor arterial on the south side of Highland Avenue. The Developer shall revise the approved plans k tncl ude the east side of Rochester Avenue, to the satisfaction of the C1 ty Engineer, prior k issuance of an encroachment permit. The Developer s1w11 De rc/mbursed for actual audited costs for constructing those improvements shown on the approved street plans for Parcel Map 9192 (Sheets 3 and 4 of Drawing No. 1215) from funds on deposit for the ultimak improvements. B. Highland Avenue shall be constructed full width (44 feet of pavement) for the entlrc length of the protect fronkga and far 442 feet west of the cenkrllne of the inkrsectlon of Highland and Rochester Avenues with approprtak transitions k the existing pavement beyond those points. The Oeveloper will ba glvp a rcimDurseant agreement k recover the cost of constructing the full width permanent street improvements from future development as 1t occurs on the south side of Highland Avenue. C. Interim right turn deceleration and acceleration lanes for westbound traffic shall be constructed on the north side of Highland Avenue, with transitions k meat the permanent pavement at both ends, to w.ln.....~. ..H 1, N.. N~.,~• w.v.A of ".• TM. ILud n... .Hall A• rclat+ursed for actual audikd costs for constructing those improvements shown on the approved street plans for Parcel Map 9192 (Sheet 17 of Orawing No. 1215) fray funds on deposit for the ultimate improvements. SIAPIEMEpT TO COURY COi~sTION! Of APPROVAL ANNEXATION 6A-O3 EXF1181T "C" CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA.~fOYGA ~~ca+rr~i~ s, .~ ~''l ' - [pNUNITY DEVELOPMENT OEPAATMENT FEES _ ~ i =~ 19" ?he following fee schedule is in effect for the Building and Safety, i Engineering and Planning Divi si onz of Che Community Develdanent De oar tment. I 7lease address any questions you may have about specific fees to the I Department in wM ch the fees are coliec tad. Fees are listed within the I Department heading responsible for the fie and the key code listed below will indicate at what point the fee should be paid. 1) Upon submittal for review or application 2) At Cime of-permit issuance 3) Prior to approval of final map 4) At time of plan check submittal Plannin Dl vision Fees entat ve lap u ittal Tract Map (1) Ini teal Study Part I (1) Extension of Tentative Tract Map ;!J Pla nnlnq Development Nlr1d Flef Design/Technical Review (Cam'1 6 Ind) M1ner Oev elopmenC Review Res. Dev. Design/Technical 0.e view Ccndi tianal Use Permit Specs r+c Plan/Planned Community En vi ron. Assessment (Ini tial Study Pt.l) Sign Permit (Indlvldwl Sign Review) uniform S1gn Program Review (,) Amendments/Yartanes Dev. D1strlct Amendment (tone Change) General Plan Amendment lartance u:..., Exceo','.on E60.9 ~ 532/Lot or actual cost plus 205, wM chev er is greater ta7 562 5251 S62 51,272 f398 51,251 f87 532 f93 ;649 ~ 532/acre 51,272 E272 S62 ;'! Other Permits and Deposits Temporary Use 5-0- Temporary Model Sales Office f32 Sales Office Cash Deposit 52,500 Dn-site Su bdivi zi do Sign Cash Deposit 5628 'e mpo rary Construction Office 5126 ANNEXATION B9-03 EXHIBIT "D" Revised 4/11/88 ;1) Appeals •Appeal of a Oi rec for (Staff Oeciston) S62 YAopeal of a Punning Commission Decision 5126 to ppeat of a Tract Map 5251 •Ap peat if filed through City Planner's Office tFppeal i; filed through City Clerk's Office En interin Division Fees entat re ai-~1~~tal Par c_I Map f207 Initial Study. Part I f87 Revert Subdivided Land to Acreage $62 + 51.25/acre ;:) Appeals YPa rcei Map f125 /Appeal it flied through City Clerk's Office ;I) Extension of Tentative Map Parcel Map f62 (1) Certiflute of Cae>pilance For: Lat Line Adjustment f186 Parcel Map Waiver f186 Mergers f186 :) Street Vacation Request f125 ;:; Monuakntatton Surety f2 ,400 + fS0/Lot (Cash Deposit, Refundable) '4) Map Checking fns Residential Parcel Maps f600 + f80/parcel Tract Naps and Non-Residential Maps of 10 lots or Uss f905 Tract and Parcel Maps over 10 Lots f755 + f15/lot or parcel i) [eprore~eut Plans •• widening of Existing Streets Interior Streets: 1-2 Sheets 3-5 Shee Cs 6-10 Sheets 1L or Mare f0.60 per lin, ft. * sheet charge for interlar streets 5600 per sheet f1 ,200 5525/sheet over 2 Sheets 52,775 + 5480/sheet Over 5 Sheets f5 ,175 + f450/Sheet cver 10 Sheets ~_ Storm Drain Plans: Same as for interior streets 'i ydrology Study: Drainage areas up to 150 acres - 5600 Drainage areas over 150 acres - 51,200 ;3j La nds ca De Plans: Ci[y maintained areas SO 10/Sheet ••FpY improvement Plans, titie Sheets will not be included in calculating charges unless, in the City's opinion, it also serves as a plan-and-profile <~,e er, Maxims for rush Jobs rill be SOS greater than those listed above. Rerf sions to approved plans/ataps ctrl M cMrgad on tM Oasis of actwl costs. ;2? Pu611c Yorks Insp. Fee S. Of of improvement cost to (25,000 4.SS of improvement cost nett 575,000 4.05 of improvement cost over 5100,000 Buildin and Safet Di vlsi on fees ui d ng ermit Var es Eased upon valuattan of work ,4) Ptan Check Fee ISS of @ull ding Permit fee (2) Drainage Fee•• General City Area S50 per 1/100th of net acre Etiwa nda Area A 6 B 175 per L/100th of net acre Assessment District 8 Planned Community Mo Fee !J1 Sf rn of and Ninhu,av tr nI a..11A1.... V. t.,. •~.. Sys iems Fee •• ;2i @eau ti ficatian Fee •• 10.20 per sq. ft. of gross building area ;Residential Only) under roof, dr f200, whichever is greater ;Gj Electrical Permits Calculated on a square foot basis for new " resldenttel Cutldings; an outlet basis for existing residential buildings and other buildings. ?; Plum6ing b Mechanical Calculated an basis of number and size of Permits fixtures and/or appliances. ••rhis fee schedule is not all inclusive -- olease check with r, he @u n ding and ,•.ety DapaPtmenC for specific fees. _7. Ca~uni tr Servites Oepartwnt See attached fee schedule for calculations. School Fees - Contact appra priate School Districts for fee amount and payment Alta soma (714) 987-0766 :e nt ral (714) 989-8541 Cucamonga (714) 981-8942 Etiwa odes (714) 899-2451 Chaffey High School Disc rict (714) 988-8511 Utilit Fees Contact appropriate Utility Company, (i.e., gas, electric, water, etc. for fee amount and payment. A list of utility companies and teLphone numbers is provided by the Engineering Di vision. Underg rounding existing overhead utilities (in-11eu fees) - see separate handout when fees are required. Current City adopted unit amounts are as follows on a ptr toot basis: Telephone - f 16 Cable TY - f 10 Electrical - depending upon when undargrounded as follows: 1986 and before - f100; 1981 - f135; 1988 and after - f128 narc, utters of ortifleation of uoaetty rill be noutnd frael school districtx and ester districts along riLh proof of payrent of appropriate fr.s prior to huilding penit isswna. _4. 5Q C` C N W Y a a ~` _ P _ _ 2 1 ~ _ - - ~ ~ w ~n .+ w » ~ = ^ Yl P N ~ ~ y` h e ~ C - W ~ u~ b tl P O u C ~ 0 H M h H ~M W 2 O N ~ LL ~ ~ s m N .~ C r, e 1(I » ~"1 N e N C .:. 1(1 f'1 v 1~ » ~O N 1O O~ .. W n OI ... i W .7 ~ = a N m m .~ 'n o g _ m ~ = o Z J ~ ., o _ e a J s » :. » .~ n LL N -~ ~ i ~ ~ N J ~ ~ N ~° ~ 0 » i ~ ee b a .. 2 is N ~ o o a i ~ o ~ 3 s a _ a n A T m A C r = i ° 4 - e - _ _ ~ _ O 9 w w • w ~{ i i N o i ~$ ~ r - , , , I ~ II I ~ I I I ~ ~~ w III _ r-~ x a W a e^ W C~ i ~ I • ~~ I ___ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ i I ~ I ° "E I I I e ' i p _ , ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; A I ~ $ "- I I I I _ _ _ _ I _ I ._ _ _ _ ~ 1 __ I I ..• ) J o I ' ~ = - I I °' °~ ~' ~ P ~~ I ~ I I I r ~ I i • i i ~ P ~~ I _ I I >,< 0 o x o I~ i. v .m r a z O C m C r O N O m r r 2 G z y m a n z m W Q U aMM ICY W a y F Z C7 Z J J W 3 0 N O W N O Z a W ~~ ~. O FL J ti v v J i a ~~ a o ~, :- i ~ s r ~ ~ N I ~ ~ ~ !i h ', ~ c ~~ ~O ~ i I I ~ I >~ I CF _ M I I i I ~ i 9 -° x `u ~ n ~ I O C p m M I i 1 ... .. ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ i I I ~ ~ 1 r ° N ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ i 'o ~; I v ~ l ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I i ~ i i .. :: ~' ~~ l~ e I l I I ~I I ~ l e 8 ~ ~ s ° N ~ ~ P i N W Y 2 Q G Y ~ 9 - 9 r e -_ ,. e; U N ~ C a 12 ~ I ! W 1 m K ~r ~ 1 W W W W W q^y Y I ~ $1 O _ O ~ G 1 I r i s ' II I N tl~ V W-I W C~ I ~ ~. N Y M I W I W W W I I B C II ! u I~ I__I ___ -~-~-_ . I --~ . i I Qf 1 9 I O I O Y ~ O pp m ~ I C ~ i I v l O I O O I ~ n l lO G O O I ,' r i oa II u~ ~'~ ~ I = e m C Ip ~ ~ I ~` ix~i o !~ 11=~ N ~ i ~ ~I .~ _ JI v I I- n m I i it y Ia III .Y.~ I- Y ^I `9T c I N P w a ~.I i i m I m I V I N I ~o I a li 9 ~ I ~ I ti s ~ Q I ~ ~I N ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _ W~ ~ ~ y I V n O~ I T I ~ N ^ w I N M M M M D I~ 6 ` ~ C C_ W W ie. m ; I ~~• m' 1 1 a ~ ~ v x. I ~ I « ~I ~ ~ a w ~ 1 --•I o N I~~, S g 8~~ 8 ~ o ' a~ ~ ~ m S m I-I = y H M M M M M '^~ ~ C m ^ m m V ~ 2 3 b __ ~O ~O V b b W ~ _ w ~+ .~ .w w ... 6 I I~ Y I O I O I N 1~ LLt 10 ~ I S._ ~ N N N I~ O P x c -~.I o N r. n n ~ e~ I n m ~ .i ~ ~ Q c _ -9I .. N t'1 R N ~ ~ ~e ~ '.ai i i ~ i Ir O 4 J ~ C ~ d 1 <i a c P A x R K e F F d € - - ~ 9 _ O • • I ~~ e~ c I ~ W N z a • .° 1 : q a I N I I l ~ I I q I b I I x ~~ I I ~ W W W W W I ~ I Q! D~ y i I I • O O Y I i ~ O i i r ^ N N 1 N ~ i w ' I w V1 V N tJ~ N ~D u .~ • TJ l I C i ~~~ • .. II y I I N I N I N I N I I ~ N I n< I I r I W O O I • I I N ~ L I ~ ~ I II ~~ . ~~~ I U I Y M ~ M I O M O ~ Y ~ ~ ° ~ ~ I O v O ~~ I O I I= n l O I O O i I Z I • u ' I ~~- ~~i U .-.. I CI. __ .I ~- u I +vl ."i ~ ~ ' 1 9 z J ICI P ~ 9 g~ ~ I n I __ ~ I c _ a I c ~~ ' - ~. I~ v I _ II o r.~ i ~ ~"• ~I m n ~ i. Yw -- a r I ~ I m ' I ^ ~ • i m T ~ ~ ~ N I ~ ' , l ' ~ ~ ~ ~I m y J' i~ ~p ~ i i y IJ 4 ~~ I~1 i 7 J J W N V ~~~ n_ C J W•: ~... L u O x ~ O :" i y l I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I ~' ~ I i ~i ~,~ ~I ~~ ~ ~ _.~ to y ~ ni ~ _~ ~ _ I i 1 r N L1 ~I V 4I ru f ,~ 1 i ___ <"1 iAl ~ ` ^ t 9 ~i f Q` c c o c c c ~ o o - 0 0 I 0 c I I c c c ^i of C i ~ _.^ ~~. i 0 0~ -s, o o~ °o o I ~ I o o N - _ N -N I - N~ N I ~ I ~ ` I °, N I ~ N ~ ~ i I N ^ I .. ~ I io ` _ I n - n ~ 1I ~ I m I I I ~ I o N O~ T 1 q~ ~ .J' N ~"i C I ~!1 c C g I 0 1 I w ~ s 6 r a r r `~ ~ K N W X [< G TENfATIYE TRACT 13835 ARCHITECTURAL A1D RESIGN 6UIDELI NES EXHIBIT 'E' I. ARCNiTECTURAL AND DESIGN GUIDELINES A. intent It is the intent of this article to provide guidelines for the design pf structures ar elements which reinforce and establish the character of North Etlwanda Foothill Area. It 15 also the intent to assure that new development be designed 1n a manner that is sensitive to, and compatible with, the character of N ctorta, Caryn, Etlwanda and the Etlwanda Specific Plan Area. Protects which 1n the opinion of the Design Review Camaittee do not meet the Intent of this article shall not be recamaended for approval. B. General Guidelines I. Protect design shall be guided by site-specific factors such as views, mature vegetation, topography, surrounding development, and similar considerations. The use of designs and site plans prepared for another site shall not be permitted unless successfully modified to 1aca1 conditions. 2. Arch Lectural and design elements which relate to the existing and desired character of North' Etlwanda/Foothills area are best describes as: - rural, rather than urban - informal, rather than formal - traditional; rather 4han contemporary - rustic, rather than polished - low profile, rather than massive - relating to people, rather than automobiles -1- ANNEXATION 89-03 EXHIBIT "E' C. Specific Standards 1. Excessive repetition of single family structures with identical floor plans and elevations shall be discouraged. Footprints and elevations shall be discouraged. Footprints and el evatl ons shall be varied per Figure 3-1. FrgORE 3-1 Number of single family dwellings 5-10 11-20 21-40 41-60 61-80 81-100 Over 100 Minimum number of footprints" 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 additional for each 40 dwelling units -- , ~~ Ml nimum number of elevations per footprint" 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 A reverse footprint of a floor plan will count as an additional footprint. Aside-on entry garage with an elbow driveway will count as an additional footprint. 2. Developer shall provide at least 50S of all lots be side-bn garages. However, a reduction 1n this requirement, in SS reduction increments, dawn to a minimum of 20S of all garages within single family tracts for side-on entries where an additional floor plan per each 5S reduction 1s provided and tf approved by the Planning Commission. The intent 1s to discourage a residential street lined with garage fronts. 3. Driveways shall not exceed 15 feet in width through the public parkway frontages on lots Tess than 75 feet 1n width. On lots 75 feet of greater to width, driveways shall not exceed 24 feet, with a FOOTPRII[T/ELEYATIOM REpUIREMEYfS -2 - smooth transition provided to the ultimate driveway width within a depth equal to the parkway depth. 4. Two-story structures should not be planned for corner parcels, unless si deya rd setbacks of 25 feet or greater are used. However, the Planning Commission may consider existing one-story portions of two-story structures not exceeding 12 feet maybe allowed a maximun 15 foot street sid4yard setback. 5. The pro,{ect shall be designed in a manner that is not only senst tt ve to, and compatt ble with the characters of the Wctort a, Caryn and Etiwanda Comment ti es, but also reinforces Lhat character through an integrated design and architectural theme. 6. 4fiile no specific architectural style is required, the integrated theme selected shall reflect the traditional architectural styles found in W ctorla, Caryn and Etiwanda, including but not limited to those listed Del ow. My one of the following themes may be util!zed as dominant theme or they may be interspersed. Both one and two story buildings are appropriate to the following categories. a. W ctorian Characteristics: - fieldstone foundations _" ° -d ---f"rya - ,. :r y.. ~.. ,.~. ~.... - porches and verandas - bay windows - vertical windows - roundheaded winders - tlapboard and fascia - board and Batton siding - large roof pro~ecttons b. California Bungalow Characteristics: - hip or gable roof/gently sloping front - porches/verandas, enriched foundations _3. c. California Ranch Characteristics: - law, rambling - rustic, lnfornml, front porches verandas d. Mediterranean Charac teristf es: - vertical lines, arching windows and entries, red the roofs - stucco siding e. any other integrated design style which to the opinion of the Design Review Committee meets the intent of this article. 7, Materials, textures, an6 architectural detailing shall be consistent with the design theme. "Stucco stone° products nay be used to create stone effects, except where river rock occurs, which shall be native stone. However, if any stone Droducts arc used, some portion of the units shall include native stone. 8. Along ma,lor (collector or above) streets and the street sides of corner lots enhanced masonry shall be n~nvl AeA ese erawniee nn none R all other fenri nn within the rear and sideyards shall be provided at the option of the builder, sub,~ect to City review and approval of the designs and construction. 9. Street s16e landscaping and irrigation shall be reeauired prior to occupancy. Said landscape and irrigation improvements shall first De approved 1n plan forty by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building peAdts. These Dlans shall contain the following elements: a. Architecturally designed mall boxes which which olo Theme is consistent alth the dwelling units provided for each house Dy the builder. See example on page 7. _¢ b. Enhanced driveway and front entry walk treatments, uti l7 zing decorative pavements and wide wai kways. c. In addi lion to the standard parkway trees, at least three 15 gallon trees per house would be planted by the but lder no later than occupancy of the home. also, accent trees of at least 15 gallons in size will be provided to numbers sufficient to equal one tree per corner for each intersection within the tracts. This tree planting is to be designed in a manner to relieve any monotony of the streetscape, perhaps by cluster planting between the homes. d. Irrigated and turfed areas shall be provided for each front and corner street side lot. e. Paseo at the end of the "A" street cul-de-sac shall be provided, landscaped and annexed to a landscape maintenance district. -5- CONCRETE CAP PILASTERS OCCUR EVERY 60' ro Boa O.C. HEIGHT VARIES 6'-6'- 6'-6' CUT STONE VENEER STUCCO WALL FINISH GRADE TUBULAR STEEL FENCE WITH Sl8' PICKETTS p S' O.C. -BEIGE COLOR PILASTEAS LOCATED AT PROPERTY LWE9 VIEW FENCE HEK3HT VARIES FROM S'8' TO 8'8' .FINISH GRADE NH VIDE 8' WIDE MOW CUUB WHERE TURF OCCURS ADJACENT TO FENCE. CONCRETE CAP PILASTERS OCCUR EVERY 80' TO X00' O.C. HEIGHT VARIES FROM 8'8• TO 8'8• BRICK VENEER STUCCO WALL FIWISH GRADE TYPICAL FENCE/WALL TREATME'JTS AT PRIMARY ALONG PERIMETER ENTRY MONUMENT SITE BOUNDARY 18• ~5• r STANDARD RURAL MAILBOXES 0 TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND #t le• ie• c 2'x5' GRAB SUPPORTS WITH CHAMFERED ENDS 5'x5• PO5T WITH A CHAMFERED TOP 4N0 ROUTED GROOVE RIVER ROCK BASE FINISH GRADE STANDARD RURAL MAILBOXES 2•x3' GRAS SUPPORTS WITH CHAMFERED ENDS 5•x5' POST WITH A CHAMFERED TOP AND ROUTED GROOVE BRICK BASE FINISH GRADE IL!• 13• ~-STANDARD RURAL MAILBOXES Y•x5" GRAB SUPPORTS `NITH CHAMFERED ENDS 0 i S•x5' POST WITH A CHAMFERED TOP AND ROUTED GROOVE STONE a.eE FINISH GRADE ~"~ NOTE: EACH ALTERNATIVE IS TVPICAI MAILBOX STAND M3 SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BV U. S. POSTAL SERVICE TYPICAL MAIL BOX TREATMENTS TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND N2 RESOLUTION N0. ~R - 3 / 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL'NC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 89-03 (HOMESTEAD LAND O EVELO PM ENT), FCR DEVELOPMENT AND ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCATED AT THE ND RTUEAgT rnRN, Ep nc Htn uL e,Nn e,Nn RnrH rc'rE.°. .^,V ENU ES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APPI 225-152-O1, 02, 03, 04, and 18 A, Recitals (i? The owner of the subject property has request zd annexation to the City. (ii) The City is pursuing a change of organization (annexation) of the subject property from the un in cc rpo rated area of the County of San 3e rna rd ino to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. !iii) Attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by reference is Annexation Agreement 89-03 concerning the 5u bj ect property located at the northeast corner of Highland anal Rochester Avenues, as legally described in Exhibit "A" cf Annexation Agreement. (iv) On September 20, 1989, the City Council of the City of .~~y~ .~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~. «~ yu~~~~ nca~ uiy wn~e niiny xiie pr'u pu sea Annexationy Ag regiment and Concluded said hearing on that date. (v~ All the legal pre re qu isi±es prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 6, Resolution NOW TH EREFGRE, the City Council of the City of Ranr.ho Cucamonga does hereby resolve by as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution are true anA correct. 2. In conjunction with this Annexation Agreement, in ton fo rmance Wli nfc ni •An •l: h rho ro „no,no c.....:, r-' ---iie ntai Qua1'i ty Ac L, an envi re nmental ~a sse ssment has been pre pa red The~COU ncil has determined that this application would not have a significant adverse effect on Lhe environment, hereby adopts a finding of no signifi rant impact on the environment, and hereby issues a Negative Oeclara Lion. ~a ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. DDA 89-02, DA 89-03, EA & AA 89-03 - BLACKMON HOMES September 20, 1989 Page 2 3. The Council specifically finds that: (a) The annexation conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: and (b;~ That the pub iic necessity and general welfare require the approval of the Annexation Agreement. 4. The City Council approves the Annexation Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "I". ~~C, RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND, WHEN RECORDED, MAIL T0: Debbie Adams City Clerk City of Rancho Cu czmo nga P,O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ANNEXATION AG REEMEfIT THIS ANNEXATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into to be effective on Se ptember 20, 1989, between the CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONG A, a municipal corporation of the State of California (City1, and Homestead Land Development {hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). A. Recitals (il Qvner is the owner and developer of Property pre se oily located in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County, Cali fo rn~ia, consisting of approximately 25 acres located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues more particularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto and hereinafter referred to as "the Property", (ii) Owner desires to annex the Property to the City if City, prior to annexation, approves that proposed Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("the Development Agreement" hereinafter). (iiil City has determined that annexation of the Property into the City would be beneficial to City and is concurrently providing assurances to Owner of Owner's permission to develop the Property by entering into a Development Agreement. NOW, TH E.R EFOR E, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1, Initiation of Proc eedinas. Subject to Paragraph 2 below; City shall initiate and diligently pursue to completion proceedings for annexation of the Property to the City in as expeditious a manner as possible and in ac ro rd ante with the provisions of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Government Code Section 56000 et seq., the p rev+ously or concurrently herewith adopted a Resolution of Application to Annex and promptly shall submit the proposal for annexation of thn Prnnorty to '"" ''i ty the vocal Ayency Fu nna Eiun Ca mmission of San Bernar0 ino County "'LA FCO"1.~V City agrees to comply with all reasonable and normal conditions and requests for additional information and documents imposed by LAFCO in ro nnection with the annexation proposal, City agrees to negotiate in goad faith with the County of San Bernardino ("County") as to the real property tax n xc ha nge between the City and the Corm ty to the end that such exchange is agreed upon at the earliest possible time. After LAFCO has made its order of . ' 7~C? ANNEX AT[ON AGREEMENT 89-03 - BL ACKMON HOMES September 20, 1989 Page 2 determinations with respect to the annexation proposal, and provided that City has approved the Development Agreement as provided in Paragraph 2 below, City shall complete the annexation proceedings. 2. Completion of Annexation Pro ceedings. Ho twithstanding the .. ^f Pa ragraFh ' above, ty -hal riG adopt re solutim. urd Briny the annexation of the Property to~~the City, nor authorize the C1 erk of the City to transmit a certified copy of such resolution pursuant to the Cortese- Knox Act to the Executive Officer of LRFCO until the City's City Council has approved the Development Agreement. 3, Environmental Review. in connection with aopro val of the Development Agreement, City shall undertake al'. necessary and appropriate review and evaluation of the potential environmental impacts thereof and the development of the Property in accordance therewith on a timely basis and in ron fo rmity with all legal requirements, and shall 6e the "lead agency" for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, 4, Notices. Any notice to either pa rty shall be in writing and given by delivering the same to such party in person or 6y sending the same by re9iste red or certified mail, return receipt requested, or Express Mail, with postage prepaid, to the party's mailing address. The respective mailing addresses of the parties are, until changed as hereinafter provided, the following: ..~Ly. Clly ui icmic im wcamonaa °320 Base Line Road P,a nc ho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Jack Lam Owner; Homestead Land Development 23470 Olivewood Plaza Dr Suite 240 Moreno Valley, CA 92388 Attn: Stephen L. Heinsa hn Either party may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein at least ten r'0` days prior to the date such cha nqe is affected. All notices under this Agreement shall be deemed given, received, made or communica fed on . per: '' "^1 i:2 ry t, a~ - '- ` ma~ied, un file deiive ry date or attempted delivery date shown on there turn receipt. 5 Attorney's Fees. If legal action is brought by either party against thr other for breach of this Agreement, or to compel performance under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall he entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' `n rs ar,d costs. 5 'Jega tion of Partnership. The parties speti fically acknowledge that the development of the property is a private development, that neither party c ANNE%ATION AGREEMENT 89-03 - BLAC KMON HOMES September 20, 1989 Page 3 is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. None of the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between or among the parties in the businesses of Developer, the affairs of City, or otherwise, nor shall it r.ause them to he r~~~;de red ;nt yen to rers °mbers of any joint enterprise. This Agreement is not ~i me nded nor shallm it be construed to create any third party beneficiary rights in any Person who is not a party, unless expressly otherwise provided. 7, Geve ra bi lity. Invalidation of any of the provisions contained in this Agreement, or of the application hereof to any Person, by ju dgme nt or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions hereof or the application thereof to any other Person or circumstances and the same shall remain in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this Agreement as so invalidated would be unrea so na6le or grossly inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate the purposes of this Agreement. 8. Exhibits. All Exhibits to which reference is made herein, are deemed incorporated into this Agreement in their entirety be reference thereto. 5. Entire Ag reement. ibis wr tten Agreement and the Exhi Di is hereto contain all the representations and the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Except as otherwise specified in thi< Gnnoemont nAn _ ..A. representations are su pe rs ed edninn to tal by this~Ag reement~and ~F.xhibi ts~he re to ~, and such memoranda. 10. Construction of Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement and the Exhibits hereto shall be construed as a whole according to their common ~~neaning and not strictly for or against any party and consistent with the provisions hereof, in order to achieve the objectives and purpose of the parties hereunder. The captions preceding the text of each article, section, subsection and the Table of Contents hereof are included only for convenience of reference and shali be disregarded in the construction and interpretation of this Agreement. Wherever required by the context, the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine or neuter genders, or vice versa. ... Pui thBr Aiw ra nceti[ in_van ant in - - _ n+~ r... ~. party covenants, on behalf of itself and its succe ssgrs ,n he irs ~a nd assigns, to take all actions and do all things, and to execute, with acknowledgement or affidavit if required, any and all documents and writings, that may be necessary or proper Lo achieve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. IZ. Governing Law. This Agreement, and the rights and obligations of the pa rtias, shall be yove rued by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Slate of California. O r~ ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 89-03 - BIAL KMON HOMES September 20, 1989 Page 4 13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute on instrument. The parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first wr Rten above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California Homestead Land Development 23410 Ol ivewood Plaza Drive Suite 240 Moreno Valley, CA. 92388 By: By: City Clerk Approved as to Form: 6y: City Attorney "City" DY: "Qvne r" ~~ 3 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 20, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM• Brad Bpllor, ri ty Pla nn or 8Y: Miki Bra it, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING $34,049 FROM UNEXPENDED PRIOR YEAR COMMUNITY OEVELO PMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO TBE VIA CAR ILLO STREET IM PRCVEMENT PROJECT, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve re pro gramm ing $34,049 from unexpended prior year CDBG funds to the Via Ca rillo Street Improvement Project. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The City Council has previously awarded change orders far the Via Cari llo project in the amount of $34,049. The primary reason for the increased Lost was to correct drainage problems far residences adjacent to the street. All the work on this pra ject has been completed, r~:,. __. :__. :.. ~.._._~ __.:__, .. ~.. .~~,. ~.. _,_ .,. .._, prior year funds are available for reprogramming. $ 61U from North Town IV Construction, FY 1985-66 $ 6,161 from Administration, FY 1987-88 $ 758 from Senior Shared Housing, FY 1987-88 $26 ,6'LO from Housing Rehab/Repair, FY 1987-88 CONCLUSION: Unexpended prior year funds are available for rep ro gra inning. A Resolution approving the reprogramming is attached. B raTY)6u 1 Tac. City Planner BB:MB :mlg Att a<hme nt: Resolution ~ ~ r RESOLUTION N0. 8 1 - ~T~(' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG A, CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMMING $34,049 FROM AVAILABLE PRIOR YEAR COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FU NOING TO VIA CAR ILLO STREET IMPROVEMENTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho tucamon9a, California, hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1 The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a Community Development Block Grant Program in compliance with the regulations established by the U. S. Oe pa rtment of Housing and L'rban Development; and (ii) 534,049 of unexpended block grant funding is available for rep ro g ra mminq from prior year unexpended Block Grant Funds as follows: $ 610 from Na rth Town [V Construction, FY 1985-86 $ 6,161 from Administration, FY 1987-88 $ 758 from Senior Shared Housing, FY 1987-88 $26,520 from Housing Re ha h/Repair, FY 1987-88 (iii) Via Ca ril lo, a street improvement program in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood, was funded entirely by Cemnun ity ue veiopment UIOtK Grant to nos in the amount of 3217,000 and required zdd itional work in the amount of $34,049; and !i v) The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on the use of these funds on September 20, 1989. SECTION 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: A, This Council approves reprog ramping of $34,049 of unexpended Community Development Block Grant funds from prior years to Via Ca rillo imoroveme nts. C ~~ U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT nATE: September 20, 1989 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner e~3 . SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) GP.ANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR - Review of the use of 61ock Grant funds including the status of funded projects and achievement of local and federal goals. I, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomne nds that the City Council approve the Grantee Performance Report for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year and direct staff to forward same to the U.S. Department of Nousing and Urban Development. II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: In accordance with the requirements of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Community Development Block Grant recipients, a Grantee Performance Report has been prepared (see attached). The purpose of the report is to review Lhe accomplishments of the past year. Capital Improvements: During Fiscal 1988-89, the City Council awarded contracts for five capital improvement pro jec is which are funded all or in part by CDBG funds. Funding for these projects was approved by the City Ccu ncil in fiscal years 1986-1987, 1987-1988 and 1988-89. Wdrk on these projects is in progress or has been completed. The following projects are funded entirely by CDBG: - Fe ron Boulevard (work in progress) - Streets in Southwest Cucamonga (work in progress] - Via Ca rillo (completed) - eveniria Vc Tar irmm~ie~eril - Sierra Madre (work in progress) The Old Town Park in the North Town Neighborhood is partially funded by CDBG and is under construction. The park will be completed in the Spring of 1991. The contract award for this project was delayed until storm drain installation was completed. O6 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT September 20, 1989 Page 2 Other Projects: The Senior Shared Housing Program is continuing and provides valuable housing counseling services for seniors in the Community. The Housing Repair and Rehabilitation Grant and Loa r. Program has lagged somewhat during the 1988-89, because the County gave notice that they would no longer offer this contract service. The City will start its repair ar.d rehx bili Lotion program during fiscal year 1989-90. III. SUMMARY; With the close of Fiscal Year 1988-89, all projects app rcv ed for funding were in progress or complete. A Resolution adopting the Grantee Performance Report is attached. Res c lly tte Bra er City P anner B B:MB:js Attachment: Grantee Performance Report, 1988-89 Resolution of Approval O Grantee Performance Re ort ~so<Par;,,.n;e+H~_,In, P ndurD.np.ea,nPn•.a,; Gammumy DemeF^ens Bah Gan; Proper ~r DIl9 Aiirival h'o 26p6-0L' ie,D 3 i'. 5:. 9320 Base Line Road aMi ki Bratt Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 i (714) 989-1861 6. Thlveportconabu olthHOl:owlnplormnhowlrp proprnuNbvMShrouph(dtla): June _30s 1989 D. Sum[ of Funds ~ Put I aW Pan Ii, loan HU0.a9a93 c. Low /Moo Banab; Worosneot. form HUD<filp 3a, d Suws of Funds ~ Pan III, loan dp191, e Aired BeneGlAa:nAes, ICrm HUpJ9<96 L Aetionsu Al(ema.,ely Further Fart HOUSmp. !orm HUD~a9a96 p. Dsp'acement, loan HUD~apap 7, Sea HUD penCDaoh 6Sp 2.'Enntlement G•an:ao podormanm Report Insbuclioni fa pwdaw on cdnylepnp ms GPR. ]. Thlnopn alaopnlNnu a. AsuasmpV DY mo Aruba of tlu rNaponship of tW usa N Community Dowbpmpt BGxM Grant (COBG) lands lo: (1) belly iMnuhod mmmuniy dawbpmps objactiwa; (2) dro NationN ObjKtivas which raquva Eu1 each CDOG usisbd aDeviry muss Ntlrr banoPo bw and moMn4 inmma peons, as b Asa prawncm or olim:naLOn of slums or bGphL or rMN communRy nnda having • prucuW ugr¢ry, and (3) M Primary ODjKpw which rpuins bLL b No apprpNO N MuI 60 parpm d al CDBG lunch aapK+dM Mnrp M ma, Iwo a Ihna mnumEw program yous spedfwd by d+o prantaa in ns prDlca Wn wi W la aclvitias whirls Dpo6t low ud moMra4 inmma parsons; D. Dasaiptbn[ ol: U I sea name of and masons for chanpas in C+a pranlw i program objamivaN aM (2) how pro pranrea wouk cDargo rLL Dropram as • mauls of :u oaparwnma; e. Summary obey mmmants rKNvod by Na prams on v propnm Irom duxana n Ib ryMdbdon. ~~ a. Thapnntw'nulhorlaod OlBdNRprnonullvawtlllusNt: a. Th!a reDOn wn;uns all name dann(wd:n poma 6 arW 7 aDOw b. To bLL best of his her knowktlp uA W GN p+o data m Ihia raporl is tma arM corron as of pw dab in ibm 6. c. Podpri asHNOna mah aw:iabb under V:a Commun:ry DavNopmpt BlorA Grant (COBG) Program has mt Wan uolixad tp redup suDS;upaAy Na amount of bnl finv.cW support lu mmmumry dovNepmml acvNOU bNOw du IavN of such suppn poor m Ta Nut of ma moral non:ly cwnpNUd CDBG program yur. _ ~:iu i o :.w nr .o ;a~ e~ _ _ __~_-_ __.--_ __ n. GU _..._. _ __ I Rain Ns rocoro'or 3 yeas prevro:.s etl~ecn ~s ohso~are brmXUDdY19,1:A6L1 rN humour 65+0 2 ~ ) Grantee Performance Report U.S.0.Psnm•nwlRouslnq StatusofFunds ~ m~'ryD: a°vm.Ml' PerlB l aOd I I BIOCA mam vmgrem /~\ ~r OM9 Approval No 250600~(exp Y31r90) +~> ~~^~~ Gus uumwr rrm rar.a City of Rancho Cucamonrla B-88-MC-06-0556 From 1-O1-88 ~6-30-89 Plrtl:9ummaryolflnouruond Fspsndltur•a CDBG Funds I 1. Urwxpended CDBG lands st end o1 prevbus repaNnq paned 'I f 813,400 2, Add vonal GDBG lands recaved I f •. Enutlement Gram (RUDJOB2, hne l3D) 417,000 ". 9urPlus krn U:.mn P.r.:ewC' NDP Se:docw-: 1~-- 7'~'-. v'*A :w) I S _ 0 c. Lo•ns quarenwad order SacWn 108 ', S 0 tl. Proprem incarro reoawetl tlunnq Gw program yea (es shown m StsNS W Fulls Pert III, mlumn 1) ',, f 7,855 e Return of OnntbMS f 0 J. TOMICDBG IUntlsavsiWdalor use dunnq this reporOnq period (cum of Yrwallhru 2ej ~i.f ' 1,238,255 1. To41CDBG IuMs•xp•nded dump tlJS npaurp ad f • Amount shown on Acoviry Sumrtwry bans, ~np 369,914 b. CDBG hxMS used fa Sapion t08 p•ym•m1 f 0 S. UMYpordad bWna of CDBG hxMa M dr •rM el Ihu nppunp pwid (fM 3 mirws liwa 4 end sD f ) 868,341 A LowlMod B•rw010udngthb Rponlnpvsybd I f. •. Tool CDBG lands •xp•MM (hom hn• H •bov), •xsp tar 5•c. toe pym•nLL ~' f 369 , 914 w i .... oa.._:....... «......_ _._ ..:......:....... .. ,-.... .,._.., -. _._.,.,,, I ' 53,772 C. Nal BkpBndlQlle{ atlblKl b proq(un h•rwfit n.gllnOpl (Iin• 8. minus ill 6D) ~ f 3_16 ,142 7. Expandlurex banafimrp bw •rd motl•nb bcprn•pwsons (•s shownn Lev/MOd B•nofil WOrluhaal f 316,142 Pan IV) f. Pargnl bswfit lo'ow •rd naNreb sxane p•rsans (YM ] •s • p•runt d Yrw 6c1 '~i 100 %- q, Proprem yov(•lmwro0b wrtficebon PV AA/A9PV,_PV^ B. LewlMod Bm•Polor MUlU•VwrCMIBC•UOm (oomDltl•enlYllo•Nnulbnp•rlod•w•MS on•ywq 10.1 Cumu4tlv nM nporidwrn suOjM b propnm bM•In obuletion b Cumu40w expen6wras b•n•fimnq bw •rd mod•nb nxom• lurwns c Percent Ormulevva benehno low ell mmm•L inrdrn•!,araens (Fw r0h e. n pq.penr pr n,y snn) f not aDPl icable s _- ~ Return Mrc record for 3 ye9rs Prerwus edlgns ere pbsol0le MnMUD~ID19.a 1IdB rel ZI CFR p•r1570 snd handbook 8510 <,1/\~ _ \ ~~ ~ o ^ ~ r~ ~ ~v ~~ T a, a ~ m o ~ o o c ~ yyjj~~ l0 6 O LL O O I £ ~i 'i b U O N N N .Ll p Y 0 l1 v N q: V i, L C O L M C_'i E m m 6 O •1 ~, m c a v o o Y v I O q L V L ~ V Y ~ Y L Y V t ~ ~ U N ~- N n i c E+m+m o m o'.m+o ~q D O J O L> L O O Z a' lJ J F- U 2 m 1 1- U O ~' m ^L ~~ 111 G d i ~ 1 ~ 3 d ~ i ~ I i N c ti LL; ~ n i ~ ~ m ^ 0 0 S - r c ti a ~[1 , = C g ~ 7 a o ~ o o ~~w e ~ O] V ~~ G~ :~~~~ a O U N ~j~~~ ~ - N N,~ +i J ~O~ ~~ C a~ ~~ C _~ I~ V Q 6~ a m t m ~ ~a C) 9 N O O N 0 0 0 c O O M n O o a O 1 m w m I E o i v . i vu a•- n ' I Y L c o p o n . ' v v m n p v m c vx .- Y.-vm vv Y L ~nO ' Y nLY > C ~ Y W c t v v E m ^ v' v . I b'1 O T N v L o 9 z .'> > E ~ O L 9 U C L d p Y ~ Y m ry >~ Y y p1 q N N O I L VI £ >> L N T L L N m~ q c m > S O m> pip 1 q of ~ i vYee OD g .^- ~ ~ ~~ ctn. E ... d vi O >..-. 2 m ( U C ~ Y O L O E n y J Y COM U O W i ~M ` ,S O i o V 2 o f W _ N ~ _ ? r E ~ Ln ~a~ y ;n H n i co u 3 O t ~ 3 v nae o.- •~ L. ~ U O. O Y ~[l A f'1 L C ' ~ ^ ~ O 1 Y NN:V ' Y Y r- n v dII NNgQ1 Y Y'fJ.- 9:V C In ~W Y ~ J L C F- m O L C N m t Ih ~(1 q O I I O yv 00 P yy~i ~ O O~ J 3 ~ a+ Y .- S E V Q 3 O N T I i ~ « ' ', . V y 0 ' W m ~ V i 9 m 2 W V ~ o o E a Y ~~ o ~•- O a ~~ ~ c U. ~ L C\ C N P L C L ~~ • ~ Y N a n y 2 ~n m y a n v a > o f~ c d ~ ~ KO CE>U V> >yY- O ' Q fi Q LL L S C E V Q i M o v a ('1 D N m m m N S N ~ ~ ^ ~ M ~ N aJ O S ~ u5 N ~ T :V j ~n~,'.3 ~ 5^•.: -1 -(~ ~; - ~ R C L c q N c E 4 r~ e n ~o o n .^- i n v ~ 9 ¢] N . ~ 9 N ~ 0 a - c_ a a~ .n~ N~ ~o ~p ~~ O O L C u oo ~ rn ~ rn \ [J O O V- O V- O n ' ~D « L L ul lI .. ;.~ o .. n .o .a o ao.° +v+irin wiww L nqq d CO N L X L~~ L mO.. .. n~^^ Eh m.. ~ cYV `o p Yv ' O N L ^qq li^ N i '' O N O 'i J y V N U N ~~ U m V N i nmm ~.^ mco ~ fpm Y m J m Y m O m M CJ C O O O L> O O L> O G O V HU 6 ml-U d ~m Y- V U Imo, ~~-_ '~~ ti b ~; -:i ' n N m M1 L b n Cl V N ~ O O C Z 6 C O 1 ~ < n ~ f..,. Z N N H n d C N R Z F r 0. 1 O d rr (C 1 'J N,T (D T' O N N N 1 O ~ < a o b m n: S 9 TS J'O C N N C O~CwAC' m n c I i -~ ~(C '1~bn o n;< 3 L l+b O d N 6 1 3 wa 1 N lTG C1RN N d to j p •• W9 ~< Na (D N N J N a O O c c ~o- N m o-~ J ~ n ~ N N 6SN N d 1 1 j m o n r u ~ • ~: ~ ~ O S I ~ n i r ~ ~ p . ~c 3 3 NOm ~ O 6 ~ M .~ m n 1 ~ x ~ rt O O ~ n S o o. ~ ~ i ~ xru ~ z < is -e* o•• n b i r O ~ 0 g ~n ~ f , ^ 0. fo . m 3 D. Z O S z N \ 0.O < J fe ry O N~ r. ~ i y yy I-- l' c b ACA d ~_ am o ~ _ ~w I srt i ~ k ' ~ onv+. ~ nee ~ M c 3 ~,! o N A ~ v - 3 o n J a L o 0~ M f0 r m o ~c ~,,, . v d w ~ ~ ~ . _ '~ Na 3~i v M< i ~e of ~"o nmv t°~ ~ n ~ m a~ ~ ~ ~ } p < J 4 x a.n z ' ~O 3 n 0.6 ... p~~. d S 60rt xN FN nw ~. ~. a f d F ~ C P d , O N r" 9 7 ~C i° \ w C O ~+ O W O d 3 '~ ~ r o Z O C O N ~ ~. -~ v N -1. 6 O '< N I W W C7 O ( ~ °) } ~? m W m W i d d Cy n s xl ,~ l~ N N N v N C y l 1F P F p' Y V W ~ ° ~ ad ~W ~ ~ W m N ) i t V N W s ~~ Iw rn ~ i x i W w -• V V ~ r v. ~N a ~ i O ~ O P p N ti u w 3 [ ~ i 'v ~ N W V~ ~i y 4 C O ~ v ~A ~ N ~ _ ~ p .O i 6 U ( W _ ~O ~ D n O Ii } ~} I _ _ o i n n-yn n ntin I G o o p o 0 o n -+ v r. -{ 1 d C a ~m ' a m ° coy com<o ~ '~ c i . . a ~ m.+ad, 1 N u G G d ~ G] J l JC !] T n n Y N n J ~ ~ J . d ~ S N " w d o ~ 0 ~ O 0b » 'S n S O' O , y N N 1 ti O m 'y O d 3 ~ n O .. ~ . 1 n M H 3 N a m E ~ 0 0 n o , ~n 3 M m x s x ~ a w o rt I 0 i n f ~_~ L ~~ fA .p C A ~ 0 7 .~ O ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~I~ '~ 0 y V a t c x 'm R w o. - av m n a.n ~+n nn:N ro ccw ~m i- ' $ = nv0~0 nOOp MN OG ~, O R !~: M1 ~ P P .T ~ ~ ~ _ N T O. W 4. c ~ 9 ' ~ 0. 0 0 O ', i ~C 0 0\ 0 0\ o N ~ l~ ~ m ~.~~ ;> w o GranteePerformenCBReport S.a.O•p.nm.nlalMou•Inp p •MUrMn 0.vNOpm•nt /~\ Low/klodBeneiitWorksheet Communinow.apm«,1 ,r &dcF GrAnt Proprnm OMB APWOe•I No. 2506-0011 (•zp 3']190) rW~.dm.n. rw N~.m.r a«w to.r.d City of Rancho Cucamonga ~'B-88- MC-06-0556 ~'prpn; l-Ol-88 rob-30-89 pn n ind •p.n0ltum ler iR. Acyublllon, Cemirvcnen er R•N•Illltllen el prep•ny IOr Mouanp ~~ X of mW CDBG unv tob ToW Mu GUBG R.EYC'.,M',.µ.lµ4W'•. Low.'mod AcMry Arnnry NUn III orv~Vb wu qwi mod ~ pbrn o~ 'I nw ~ Au van Pu Nvnbr j~Y ~imod ~ ordn ~~ wn I i modro mpworo -- Not applicable ~ '~~, p.nn: cowup ArnMry Numtu Not appl lcable AcWiry Nun Nun d Pioprun Auu W Tad Wmn ~' Loxrmod ozn Nb aWn ud r•DOrd~9 Woos ii ruporvy p"od 8umolSWtl•rMOwrhpaCo•W ..nnc ~w upmonun•mnropenmpnnmmuianu.cnrnw.auniryopawwruad •uxm • 316,142 p.nrv~. ro,aL•.~upaunmerom P.na.n..nd pl • 316.142 ---- R•wn n4p noor0la ] yw loan NOOdaAa An (1.881 PnrwuR •8pon n oD•oMl• nl 21 CFR p•n 570 •nO n•rd0odh 6510 2 <~`1~~ Sum of Dlnel Ewp•nAilury. ; Grantee Performance Report Status of Funds Part III u.a.aP.nm.mmnoomw •MUrb•n0••MOpm•nt ~~ Cammuniry WnOm•m Blod Gnm Progvn - ~ ~ f wee I w.a. LvnP ~ v~om.m hams A~71!•ni• vtl wvi• of Mmnw nur iox M SuD MW Sum w.~..e ' Ir I •op•nl Furq • e -o lI -e •• ~ 8820 ~I, Residential Rehabilitation -repayment of I I b7,855 I subsidized loans ~i I i i i I it i i ' i ~ i ~ ~ j ~ . ~ 'Alrch rrm/+•(iw imWCtbnU .+3i-~~^'' ;_!', ToW a 7855 wW n V11~ I•W!e ~IX ~ yN vn.+w~ •eitlon n oMorr P•p~ 01 P•QM IamXUO-/o/a.1(Sal M Z/ CFR wn aI0 rM Mndbock 10 4 ~/ O j~ ~ * C) U a ~ ~£ m y ~ s~ yy f~ m ~i~ py N E N o Q y U ~A1 ~! I v ~ U lC~ ~ ~ F V ~ ~~ O ~~ «~ ~-~ a A ~a i~ ~~~ i -i I n by C ~9~ 0 0 o io ppp O 1 ~ I ~ I ~~~ O O ~ E o m ~ ~ E _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O m ti ae ae x 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ c p, .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ : %~ a c m N L o c v ~ .- v+ m c c N i o W o .- N L i- ~ ' N L V 1 N V J O J N C L V- O C L y L J O e C N O 9 O N V~ V C E Y O N~ I N rou La OIN PL I N C O ^' ~ r l ~ N N 3 60 O Y ~ ~ ~ _ ' L N ~ N A N N I ~ w9 ~ c~ m E F ~ s . m k k 3 N 41 S W L 4! J N of N VI VI Y c c >, L ~ T ~ D E y ~ a o + - E o J V W V V ~ E ~ C O v J W O - 6' ~ :V 6 VI L o y ~ • i ~~ a z$ 7n 8 ua U P; ~$ 8~ ~~ `1 ~ -r ~s ~~ ~Q ~4 4 1 3a3 J; W a n J J VI d ~? ~ ~ S CS OID J ~ O N 6 3 u a 3 nN J m3 s~+C PO. N V n O -~ '+ n Opd M !D 4~0 ~ O in ~ O N ~ A m Y Y O O R d !0 O O O O O _ W J O l w ~s -.. ~mwon ~,Y 3 n Y m ~ n 3 . J . n J£ o o N N o m M O oN .o ~, ~ocaJ ~ Y-n a an aPd a J O-o sn o o rt lm .o Y v~.r n~ ~»a o.Y -s m a Ysn Jan in ~n na~nn JY M a < a i m e Mme. s (r .R a o d mdJ 00 0 0 o a m ono J~O Jn-~Jw Ye a Nm Nnz n n °nr nm m c ~ n T .+ o n a n -.. r i z d Y~ Y 3 N 3 J 3 a a d J a n O d N ~ ~~ OZ N ONJ JN (D O~ O d C a~ a O d w (f N N C N ~ O J Y S O G O O ~O J O [t d~ C7 d O J P J rt "1~ N n £ rt _ £ £ c w C N S Y S O C '4~ ~. N a n ~C ~O ~n n ~. N VI N n N r1 a r1 • J d V~N-+ P P~.a O lrt ~•S n3 ~ N n o m -n o J m 0 a .. m 0 ~ -•.~ - +.y d 3 ~c 3Jm Y m n n a a Y Y m N E o a m M d a ~ ~. -n ~ ~. Y a a n n ~ c in o n as tonoJR ~.a a Nrt +Yn o n ~ N aR~~ N arr Y ~~ mno .o Y >-ma J nm m ~o mJ n c C ~C V£ J Y O J a Y N O f1 n P tY N J ~+ O rt -1~ 2 Y t'f « d _ ip O 9 S d C O d J J N ~. O P ~ ., N 4 N ' 3 ~~~ a ~..y o?~ J ~ » p ~ Q i ~ d ~4~ n •!V `L III I O ~ rOmi C N R o 7~ f J ~ rZ ~ 1 ~ y d ~ I~ m m a i m m .rw~ ma >•~+~ n~ m m ~ O ~ m ~' n °' 0 0 0 0 0 o n o a w ~ w O ~+ v n ~. ~ ~. o i I N n N ~ w.. ~ nn £ -nnn J n ~ n 3 'S a 'S w O O O a J I O O N w w N n l l~ t0 l 3 S n l C N ;-~ S~ P I I _ T ~om n rJ o a m N w n y ~ ~ m o o o~ Y ~ ~ 3 n < a N N I fu `v O ~O O a ~n ~ a Iv !D y 6 n -A 6 in N N Y J E O ~. I 6 b n n i ~ tD n; P O N £ . rr YN O J C JO(G Y YN O G , ~i ~ J ~l ~ ~ ~ T ~ % O N S N ~ O C N -+ Ll a I m coc ~o o< oQm av m u N (i a N O O ~ ~. n O 'T 6 I n 7 0 u N ~ n J O 'I -.. w ~ ~ d N N ' On O N b J O O' ' I N N a Y c 9 S ~ M S£ N w N O . j R O J 9 'O .~ J ~ S G -~. O j '-1~ i ~. ~' y ~ tL ._, 6 ~ N ~ ~ O i i W N d N (U rt N P ~O P lD 6 b E O .+ N S I I (D X a !p J J (D i W m o I n m m . O w . F , c rt N d o rt n S N S '1 O M n N ` J N w J £ N ~ m r m o d n n n . Oo -ten Y mm ~ o a ~~ m y, ~ ~ a ~ s ~ , n n N as a Y o ro n m t0 -. a a < N ~ ~~~~ 98 ~~~s i~~~ O ,~_ ,a~ ° ~ a ~ ~ ~ = ~ npp E, ~ ~E< ~ B ~' Y3~ 8 ~~$~ E Y 6 I ~~ a~ _ 4 'e~ ~9 i ~ a~~~ i i _~ ~`~6' ~P~ ~t ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ml r~ ~ m~~~ J ~~~ O . O Z ii dM '~ 3 u a i ~Vap ~4y CF a~ •u.s ccvuuc er oe ie•;r,c ;nim see-m~-vn~, s:ue `\ ~ / GRANTEE PERFORNANGE REPORT No. 7a Assessment of Use of Community Development Block Grant Funds in Relationship to City and National Community Development Objectives The 1988-89 Community Development Black Grant Dro gram committed the City of Rancho Cucamonga to one new public works project and two on-going programs. in order to wppu rL Line se prujec LS and programs, Lhe majority of fwids received and remaining unexpended from pervious years, were budgeted to them. Housing Rehabilitation In '.982-83, the City established an en-going, multi-year Housing Rehabilitation Loan Preg ram and a Senior Citizen/Disabled Persons Repair Grant Program. The housing Rehabilitation Loans Program offers below market interest rate and deferred loans (with interest written down by the City) to low and moderate income homeowners for a maximum term of 15 years. The Senior Citizen/Disabled Persons Repair Grant Program offers a non-repayable grant of up to >1 ,50v to individuals or fannies that meet eiig ihii!ty and income requirements. There were 25 re pa ~ir grants. The re ha6i iita Lion loan program performance logged in 1988-89 will below the goal set in the HAP, despite newspaper advertisements, newsletter articles, and staff outreach to target groups, The City has, through its program subcontractor (County of San Bernardino Dffice of Economic and Cononunity Cev elopment) process a number of applica Lions, but only 1 home rehabilitation loan was funded, In 1989-90, the City will initiate a City-operated grant and loan program. Southwest Cutaponga Street LproveaEnts - Sierra Nadra, Avenida Yejar, and "rl di iu'd Cauri By repairing and upgrading public improvements in southwest Cucamonga nd offering low interest loans and grants, Lhe City hopes to encourage private investment in the area and ensure all residents a safe and pleasant living environment, ~,j 7 ~' With the completion of the major needed public improvements In the North Town neighborhood (the city's other eligible target area), the City Council directed staff to shift the focus of CDBG funded improvements to Southwest Cucamonga. The selection of projects for funding in 1988-89 followed the priorities set by the City Council for upgrading the area. These streets were the next to the north to south priority order. The work involved resurfacing the street and construction of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks along the entire length of the street in southwest Cucamonga. Design of the improvements has been completed and the contract has been awarded. Construction is expected to be completed in the fall of 1989, North Town Park Devektpment Due to difficulties complying with HUD mandated schedules, the funds which were allocated to construction of the Turner/Hermosa storm drain lateral were reprogrammed to pay for a portion of the cost of development of a neighborhood park on Feron Boulevard In the North Town neighborhood. The total cost of the project is expected to be over E900,000. CDBG funds will cover $300,000 of the oast. Design of the improvements has been completed and the contract has been awarded. Construction is expected to be completed In the fall of 1989. Peron BoWevard Street Impmvemeats Funds were set aside in 1986-87 to reconstruct the south side of Feron Boulevard adjacent to the proposed North Town Park site and additional funds were reprogrammed to the project [n 1988-89. The project was delayed while major drainage improvements were made In the area. However, a contract has been awarded and completion Is expected in 1989. Senior Shared Hovsl~ The Inland Mediation Board operates this program of assisting senior citizens who want to continue to live Independently. The two purposes ct the program are to counsel seniors on their living options and assist those who cannot live alone to tlnd roommates among other active seniors. The city allocated 58,300 to continue this program. The program has been operational since the summer of 1985. Eleven JOB/OI804-GPR 2 c seniors were counseled and one roommate match was made this year. One hundred percent of these were low moderate income. This program meets the city`s goal of providing a decent home !n a suitable living environment for all residents. Admiotstrative In 1988-89, the city budgeted less than 20 percent of its entitlement award for various allowable administrative costs, Including Fair Housing Services. No. 7b. The city has not changed its program objectives for 1988-89 and would not change them as a result of its experiences. The ohjectives for the 1988-89 program (as contained in the Final Statement of Community Objectives) were: 1. To eliminate and prevent slums and blight and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare while preserving the housing stock for people of low and moderate income. 2. To provide information and affirmative support for the Falr Housing laws of the state and `. ederal governments, In support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a su[[able living environment. 3. To provide netghborhood parks and recreation facilities in low and moderate income neighborhoods !n order to support rehabilitation of those areas and ID order to meet the needs of the residents. Creation of these centers for community activities will Improve the living environment In the surrounding low and moderate income neighborhoods and support the prevention and elimination of blighting conditions, as required under the national priorities. 4. To eliminate hazards to the public health and safety and prov[de street' improvements N areas targeted for housing rehabilitation assistance. Priority In these improvements is being given to areas whose residents are predominantly low and moderate Income and to repairs whlrh will correct health and safety hazards, thus Improving the liv[ng environment. Nn comments were received from the public on any part of the CDHG program during the past year. JOfi/01804-GPR 3 1 ~~) Gl c / RESOLUTION N0. ~~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RP,NCHD CUC AMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUNi TY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, 1988-99 FISCAL YEAR. WHEREAS, in 1988-89, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, conducted a Community Development Block Grant Program; and WFIER EAS, the 1988-89 Community Development Block Grant program has been discharged according to federal requirements and meets 6o th City and federal program objectives; and WHEREAS, the preparation of a Grantee Performance Report evaluating the programs is required by federal regulations; and WHEREAS, the Grantee Performance Report is required to he approved by the City Council prior to su hmittai to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. NCH1, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the Community Development Block Grant Grantee Performance Report for the 1988-89 fiscal year is hereby approved. ~1 3ov CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Gary H Sheu, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: AMENDING MAP FOR TRACT N0. 10210, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF I ans era on o ~ approva o ~n ng p wT nthT a s~lc special studies zone, to adiust lot lines to accomodate special setbacks requirements pursuant to final geological study, submitted by Nordic i Development Company RECONEMDATIDN: It is recommended that the City Council open the public hearing and continue the hearing until October 18, 1989, to hear the subject amending map. Background/Analysis Tract No. 10210, located on the north side of Almond Street, west of Sapphire Street, was originally approved by City Council on September 4, 1985, and was recorded on October 7, 1986. Due to potential seismic hazards, particularly fault rnnturP a <Pi cwir ha vardc rannrt wac etmnlPted h_v a Cta tP RPaistered Geotechnical Engineer. As the result of this report, lot line adjustments and special setbacks are required. Changes in the lot lines of the map were conditionally approved at Design Review on August 24, 1988. Special fault zone setbacks are shown on the map. The developer, Nordic Development Company, is submitting the amended map for approval at this time. However, due to the developer's inability to resolve a buildable area issue raised by the City's Planning Division, it Ts necessary to continue the pu611c hearing until October 18, 1989. ResDec s bmitted, i f. RHM:GHS:sd~--- . ~,~J ------ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p~cntitpH STAFF REPORT ~~~9.^ 5„~ \i9 ip DATE: September 20, 1989 F ~ ~'" V__- TO Mayor and City Council A ~. FROM: Duane A. Baker, Sr. Administrative Assists-~ SLIBIECp: Status Renor[ on the Activities in the Vicinity of the Labor Camp This report will serve to update the Council on activity and actions regarding the labor camp and surrounding properties. Staff last reported on this issue on August I5, 1989 in a memo (attached) outlining activities of the Arrow/Labor Carnp Task Force. Below are actions being taken by the City and other agencies on an ongoing basis and since our last memo to the Council. General Activity The City has spoken with the property owner on a number of occasions regarding the clearance of the site. beyond weed abatement as his development was coming up and he preferred to do all work then. Afler discussing the recent fire and the concerns of neighboring residents, the owner of the property has verbally agreed to clear the remaining. underbrush and hillocks on [he site. A letter was sent to the owner outlining the specific work rcyuested and he will notify the City when he has scheduled the work. Staff will keep the Council informed of this development. 2. The City has posted in the labor camp area the attached ii L,..~ Ao~ii.~n ~a G~ol.h .. i.....,i~.. ~b...~P i....L ioo r... work where they can go for help. In addition, these fliers have been given to the Sheriff's Deputies and community relations personnel who work in this area for additional distribution. Along with a flier aimed at workers, there is a flier aimed at employers and contractors. This flier will be distributed through contractors groups and _~~~ Labor Camp Status Report September 20, 1989 Page 2 associations as well as through the Sheriffs personnel who have been stopping contractors along Artow. The fliers inform the individuals of the Employment Development Department's (EDD) casual labor desk in Ontario aimed at day laborers. This program has been worked out in cooperation with [he EDD who have reported an increased number of employers calling their offices to use this program simply from the articles hat have appeared in the Dailv Rcoort. 3. Staff has been working with the press in an effort to communicate to the public the actions that the City is taking in this area. These articles have helped to communicate to the contractors and the day laborers the City's tough stand on activities in the area as well as communicate the employment help that is available through the EDD. Sheriffs Department The INS has made several small one time sweeps in the area to keep their presence known. The last sweep was during the week of August LiS[h. the INJ wtll continue to make these small raids separate from the coordinated sweep being planned for the near future. 2. The Sheriffs Department will continue planning for a coordinated artd extended INS/Sheriff sweep of the area to include laborers and contractors. This effort is in the planning stages and will be carried out when INS personnel become available. 3. The Sheriffs Department has and will continue to make extensive patrols of the area in the early morning and wiii continue to hand out warnings and citations [o contractors who have been coming to pick up workers in the area. 4. 'fhe Sheriffs Department recently rcyucsted from and is now evaluating a program from the City of Santa Ana, which was used in a similar situation, to see if it can be ~~~ Labor Camp Status Report September 20, 1989 Page 3 applied here. This program was a way to communicate with the workers to le[ [hem know of culturally accepted behavior in the United States so that some of the problems experienced to date could be alleviated. S. The Sheriffs Department has begun sending copies of all citations issued in [ha[ area for Drunk and Disorderly Conduct to the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABCj Board. in addition, a request has been made for the .4BC to investigate the EI Chico Market. Rancho Cucamonp,~ Fire Protection District Responded to a mattress and grass fire in the labor camp site. Copy of a narrative regarding the fire is attached. Traffic EnEineerane Have posted "No Stopping/No Standing" zones along Arrow. In testimony given at [he Public Safety Commission, local residcnis havc cbserved that this action has helped reduce the numbers of people waiting for work in the area. Planning Currently the owner of the labor camp property has a development application in the Planning Division. This application is incomplete and the developer is faking [he necessary steps to complete his application so that it may be submitted to the City for processing. Above are the actions that have been taken since our last report. fhe Task Pbrce and the agencies which we have been working with will continue to meet on an ongoing basis to resolve the problems in ihts area. As [he lack force meets and actions are taken, staff wiii continue to keep the City Council informed. ~~Y ~~ ~.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 18, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, 8r. Adminietrat ive ! Aeeiet\ y SUBJECT: Artow RoutB/LabO C T k F . ~~cnniaL ~0~9. Y ~~fI'"p~kA Yiy .~. V / A L ~ IZ 19 ~ The Taek Force for Arrow Route/Labor Camp met to discuss actions that can be taken to improve the situation in that area. Before going into futu-e actions, the Taek Force went over actions that have been taken in the past. Listed ie a summary of these. The FSLe Dieu ict 1. Fire Znapert ion at E1 Chico Maiket and surrounding apartmerta in January 1989. At that time minor vio lot ions were corrected. 2. The fires in the area have been limited since :seeds .have bas.: a.,e ted, and activity hoe dropped since the Labor Camp was torn down. The Sheriff's Station 1. The Sheriff ie contacting Santa Ana Police foc information on programs that they have used in improving a atmilar eituat ion in Santa Ana. 2. The Sheriff hoe been making extensive patrols of the area in the morning hours, and hoe been handing out waznirge to contractors who have been coming to pick up .workers in the area. 3. The Sheriff hoe been making periodic sweeps of the Labor Camp and neighboring properties to keep people from est abliehing campB ices or she It er e. 4. The Sheriff hoe and will continue to work with the INS in coordinating sweeps of the area. cone Entorcemenc 1. Providing immediate reeponee to any calla from that area. 2. Pasr calls from the area have usually dealt with weed e, trash, maintenance or downed fences. 3. Have been asking workers to Inoue along when complaints are received. 1 ~~ Arrow Route/Labor Camp Task Force August 15, 1989 Page 2 Traffic Ena ineecina 1. Wi11 shortly be posting "NO Stopping (NO Standing" zones along Arrow Route. Build ins and Satetv 1. Involved in the actual clearing of the buildings on the Labor Camp property. 2. Since structures on the Labor Camp have been removed, Building and Safety has not had much activity. General Activ itv i. The ze is currently a proposed development plan for the Labor Camp property and surrounding propert tea. This development is currently in the normal development review proceeeing stage, but the City cannot expect to see any real activity on the site for at least 5-32 months. 2. The City hoe been talking with the property owner to insure compliance with weed abatement and other types of hazard abatement. 3. The City hoe sent a letter to the Building Industry Aeeoc tattoo asking for cooperation in improviny the eituat ion by not picking up workers in the area. 4. The City hoe talked with Lne Emp LOyment Deve lopmani Depa rtmant (EDD), and has been working with them on employment programs Eor the people on Arrcw Route. 5. The City has been communicating with the reeiden^.s in the area to let them know what's happening, and will continue to do so. .._~.. the past actions b: iefly re-exam iaod, the Tact. Force has r.ow identified several actions which thoy will be doing over the next few weeks to help imprcve the situation. These items are: 1. Continue exi:a Sheriff patrolling in the mornings, and adv tae contractors of legal ramifications of picking up illegal workers. 2. contact county Health Department -- This would mostly be used as a resource to give a determination of a eituat Lon in which a health hazard ex iet s. City staff would then have to do the legwork. 3. The city is talking with the property owner to see what can be done to clear the site. 4. The City will be talking with the City Attorney to determine Lf the City's new Nuisance Ordinance can be applied in this instance. ,~~ ~C, Arrow Route/Labor Camp Task Force August 15, 1989 Page 3 5. The City will work with the EDD in developing a program for workers, will have flyers at local markets in the area, and hand them out along the street apprie ing people about work to 6e had at the EDD offices in Ontario. 6. Work with contractors to let them know that Arrow Aoute is not the place to pick up workers, but instead they should go to the EDD office in Ontario. Part of this effort would be for Sheriff patrolmen in the morning, when they give warnings to these contractors, to al eo give them a flyer indicating where they can go to pick up day laborers. "/. Use the press. Use the Dailv Aemrt to alert citirens to what actions the City ie taking in trying to alleviate the problems, as well as alert contractors to whae Se happening in the area. Also use the Spanish language newspaper, La Voz, to alert the workers ae to where they can go to qet work. 8. Contact County Social Services to determine if there is any assistance they can provide Sn finding housing for those who are using the Labor Camp ae a campground or who have no hou sing. 9. investigate pulling liquor license from the EL Chico Market to cut down on ertraneoue gathering in that area. The Sheriff's Department .li 11 start se..^.d i.^.4 a copy of all cites iosued in tfat area fcr Dru rk antl Disorderly Conduct in Public to the Alc holic Beverage Control Department (AHC), and will contact them and advise them that we would like an ABC investigation of the E1 Chico Market. Those are the actions the Taek Force has identified. Tha meeting again after we have had a chance to get some of these of or started to see if there ie any effect, and what else c :ask Fcrce meets, i will continue to keep the City Counc CAS:j1s cc: Jack Lam Jerry Fu lwood Task Fcrce Members n„nt; .ca fcr~ rnmma aa;,.~ 1:80.10/89-583 Task Force will be actions taken care an be done. As the it informed of our ~~~~ CONTRACTORS AND EMPLOYERS Do You Need Workers for One-Time Jobs, Temporary Assignments, or On a Regular Basis The Employment Development Department Can Help The Casual Labor Desk is now available to help you get the laborers that you need. Call Benny Perez at 983-5821 ext. 316 with your labor requests or stop by the office at 1511 E. Holt B1., Ontario. The Casual Labor Desk is there for you Monday through Friday 7:00 am to 5:00 pm 6 a Arrow Employm~rlt Wvrlopm~n_ t Wpt. I-10 FtNway \y ~U ~. JOBS DAY WORK AND ~.ONG TERM WORK If you need work Jobs are available at the Employment Development t7epartment 1511 E. Holt Bl., Ontario 7:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday For Information Call 983-5821 or Drop By In Person We are here to help you get work Employment Dw~lopm~nt D~pL I-10 Freeway Hotl &. J~~~CJ 1 TRABAJOS POR DIA O PERMANENTE Si uste esta necesitado de trabajo Trabajos estan disponible con el Departmento de Employment Development 1511 E. Holt BL, Ontario 0700 - 1700 Lunes a Viernes Paza Informacion Llama por Telefone a 983-5821 0 Presence se en Persona Nosotros estamos aqui paza ayudazles encontra trabajo. Empbymrtnt IHV~lopm~nt ~ HoN BI. »way '~ /U SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FOR FIRE N3418 On August 31, 1989 at approximately 1349 hours, I responded in the capacity of Duty Chief (shift supervisor) to a reported grass fire in the 8700 block of Foothill Boulevard. First arriving units reported by radio that the correct location of the incident was actually the old labor camp with access off of Arrow Route. Upon arrival, I found a grass fire burning; grass which had grown among the concrete slabs that were once large bungalows. This fire may have been on 1/2 to 3/4 acre, including the slabs. Suppression efforts were unhampered and free from unusual circumstance. There were several persons on scene who could have been cooking bu[ no evidence of this was found and circumstances for cause were officially listed as "suspicious." Respectfully submitted, i' ~ Robert A. Corcoran Division Cliief Operations RAC/rer ~' I Signs to direct laborers to state job office 9i W IW „rlrMani fdlyoa in EogWh and 9paniah w eapaetad b be posbd along Arrow AouY on Friday blling d. laborers how ehq nngat JoM thro X the eau Empleymsnt 1lsvalopmmt Department. Rancho Cuumonya omclale, who haw•bsu wrestling with a way b yet day labonn oft of Arrow Route, hope that tM Jobmatch program ie the en- ewer b dlecounyloy the workers flnm tM popular spot whero day laho»n [art mooch no-stopping dgn wero peered al the serset fom Vineyard Avenue W Baker Avuue in an attempt b dlemurep nntramon from atoppiry slog Artvw Route to pick up wwkm. Cky allkdala uld the noatopping sign and Inenaaad ahari8 a patrob luw partlallq datarnd the utivity. Nowawr, tM city also wanb b iulp the la6eewn find smploymmt. A city Wk force of city stag mam- Mn and dtium in coniunmlon with eM stab employmen[ department hope that the daY laboron and eontnc- ton will take them up on the oiler of jobs through the state sgency. HUeM esker. • city senior adminis~ trativa auiatant, uid the crate amploy~ mmt oflia will act u n matchmaker betwun the mntncton and the work m. Balur wid contn<bre ears cdl the employment of11n end uk for workers. The day labonn would be at the shb employment oft-ice on Holt Boulevard in Ontario waiting to be matched with the empployer, 1Ta Bien will be dbeributed b com cotton, pored along Arrow Route, and eherllTe depu[iea will hand them ouL u they make their Detrols along Arrow, Haker uid. The Oien will include e map showing how b get to the employ ment office from Arrow Route Cmeracton or workw un n1i tl stab employment oRiro at 889.682 The oBlu at 1611 E. Hole Blvd Onbrlo is open from 7 a.m. b 6 D•n naksr ma. "The hope la [hat the worker end el coneraMOr will use the ryebm," Bak said. "We srs hoping chic will dlsvie the problem." (~3 r. 4 a tabor s~: ~t wc't ___ trying dandle hazards yet help workers ey Michael Mahi Btatf Writer Jce .41fen calls hinieif the tinoffi~ cial spokesman for day leborero who mngregrare along Azmw Rout in Rancho Cucamonga. "You need somebody w work:'" Alfaro asked s reporter. "I'm the hardest working guy out here." Altaro, wearing a green windbreak er jacket end a baseball cep, said he speaks for ell the men who gather along Arrow Route m the early morn tog hours waving down landscaping end bwldrng contractors m search of workers. The 52.yeanold electrician stood along the well of the EI Chico Market on Arrow Roule song wi!h shout six other workers hoping to get a day's work At times more then 40 moaily Hispan;c men ere trying to get a day's ~.4 el,...n A..nw w "These guys ere lust trying to make it," Alfaro setd as a Rancho Cucamonga sheriffs deputy patrolled the street "They don't want a hassle. They lust went to work." But Alfaro, a C.S. cn;zen. ;e coin fronted w;th several obstacles ;u h;s role es uno(tinel public relenons spokesmen for the day laborers of Rancho Cucamonga. Responding to residents' eom~ plaints. coq' off~ciels have steppsd up efforts to deter day IaMrers from seeking employment m the mostly res;dennel ne;Rhborhtrod by posting no stopping signs along Anna Route between Cmevard and Baker ace vA up' task force is working wrth the staa• Employment Ueveoopment Ik~partment to help match the wnrk~ era with cnntractora so Arrow' Route won't be used as a mee4nR Dlece. Another problem s that the rnen use the old labor camp sate on Arrow Route ee a place to sleep and cook their meals after a day's work However, reeidanu living in two mobile home parlu behind the old labor comp believe that uasefe wndi- tions exist in the properly Including overgrown weeds, people gmping out and cooking over open tiro. A Bro wee reported et the former Isbor camp shout two weeks ego. The origin of the smell Bn wu allegedly hom • lit cigsrotte that ignited e metres. ARer the fire, residenu in Cua Volente mobile home Derk asked the City Council on Sept. 8 if the owner of the 2~~ecre Bite plea to develop the property. Duane Bskar. n ctty eentor edmin- iatn[ivs eWStent, aid the owner of the land, FwMei Limited Partnership of Monteroy Perk, hu submitted pre Ilmmery plans ror a proposed .iee~ apartment development. A tree study still is pending beforo the plans can be tubmittad w the Planning Commiuion, Baker aid. "We've been working with she own en to see whet can be done about the weeds end other nuisances;' Baker said "The owners have been very cooperative." Immigration end Natursiiretion Services egenta and Sen Bernardino County sharitFe deputies conduct oc cueiond swee s of the old labor nmD, but the Say lebonn seem to make their way back to the csmp that Altaic said ilia matly Hispanic men that congregau along Arrow have heeded the warnings end that they try not cause s problem. Ho aid work hu been herd to find end that he only gets • job about every other day. "We know whsle happpeening. We reed the newspepsn," Alhro veld, "The guys m out here to work and not ceuu problems." go away -- ---- - CITY OF RANC;HU CCCAMOISGA STAFF REPORT ~ DATE: September 20, 7989 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council 6 City Manager ~ FROM: Jerry B. Fuiwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, Cartographer ~ I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE ' CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR SUBSCRIPTION Tp ; THE CITY'S vEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASE ~. FOR THE INITIAL SUBSCRIPTION AMOUNT GF $10,000. ', RECOMMENDATION: StaFF recommends that City Council approve the agreement between the City and the Cucamonga County Water District far subscription to the City's Geographic Information System tatabase for the initial subscription amount of 510,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSTS: Since the development of the City's Geogtaphic database, staff has received several requests Eor maps that are generated from this svstem. The Cucamonga County Water District in their request for various layers indicated the need to receive the data on diskettes for downloading to their system. A one time data transEeY cost factor of $10,000 will be received Prom the Cucamonga County Water Cistrict with a possible $500 per month subscription. P. spec tf.ully submi ed ~x~~-,% err; B. r^ulwood Denuty City Manager JBF:de Attachment ~` THIS AGREEMENT is entered into in the State of California by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereafter tailed the CZTY and Cucamonga County Water District 9641 San Bernardino Road P.O. Bin 638 Fanchn Cucamonga, California 91730-0638 hereafter called the WATER DISTRICT. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: This agreement is for furnishing by the CITY to the WATER DISTRICT coverages of land based information from the CITY'S Geographic Database through the transfer of digital data by hooking up the WATER DISTRICT'S hard drive to the CITY'S Macintosh II computer that is tied into the CITY'S Prime computer system. This transfer will be accomplished after regular working hours, weekday or on Saturday at City Fiall. Subsequent updates to the database will be provided by the CITY on diskettes furnished by the WATER DISTRICT. The data the CITY provides shall be used only in Acvclnnm mh of the LIdTRR IITCTA Tf T'C nwn hncinocc ,ahirM shall include servicing and maintaining records on behalf of it's customers and clients. The WATER DISTRICT shall not permit any third party to use this data or allow data outside cf the WATF,R DISTRICT'S business premises. This data shall not be duplicated fox save in iLS oriyinai form nor shall any part LhereoC without prior 'written consent Erom the CITY. This ayreement entered into by the WATER DISTRICT with the CITY shall make the WATER DISTRICT bindiny to the C TTY'S computer security policy and any changes made to oa :'' policy th e.-eoF. 3~s 4. The CITY shall furnish to the IdATER DISTRICT only those layers of data for all parcels in the CITY specified here: la) Lotlines Ibl Right-of-Ways Icl Addresses Idl Street Names lel Street Dimensic,ns (fl Drainage Easements lal Equestrian and Community Trails (hl Street Centerlines 5. The WATER CISTRICT shall pay to the CITY a lump surti amount of $10,000 for only those layers of data specified itt paragraph 4. The above referenced amounts shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct or indirect costs, including the work of employees and consultants. Payment to the CITY by the WATER DISTRICT shall 6e made in accordance with the schedule sat forth below. lal $10,000 upon receipt of layers specified in paragraph 4. (bl upon writter. request from the WATER DISTRICT to the CITY for updates to the database, the CITY shall be compensated by the WATER DISTRICT for one-third of }he an }i~al nn~}c •n lahnv Inv }he fTTV }r. ha~~.-. accomplished said updates. Ir.) The WATER DISTRICT does have the option of requesting the updates on a monthly basis with a five hundred dollar ($5001 subscription paid to the CI1Y monthly. This subscription will be reviewed annually as operation costs increases in the CITY. 6. Paynle nts to the CITY shall be made by the WATER DISTRICT upon receipt of invoices submitted by the CITY, in accordance wi t'n the schedule outlined in paragraph 5 F:VVC 611V VV1LC5 711411 UC Ud1U Wltll 111 Llll ['tV I.~IVI (ldVti after receipt by the WATER DISTRICT, All charges shall Ge in accordance with the schedule outlined in paragraph 5 and subparagraphs la) and (bl or lal and Ic 1. / ~ Pa ymerts for additional services requested in writing by the WATER DISTRICT and not included in paragraph 4 shall 6e negotiated with the CITY and paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the terms negotiated. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced as a lump sum amount as specified in paragraph 5 and subparagraphs lal and Ibl or la) and Icl. THE CITY and the WATER DISTRICT mutually agree and stipulate that the data, documentation, drawings, reports and/or other materials produced as a result of this agreement are intended to be used for reference purposes but not as legal documentation of elements of property description. Such elements including, but rot necessarily limited to, property lines, lat areas, right-of-way designations, bearings and distances. This Agreement may be terms Hated by the WATER DISTRICT upon the giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to the CITY at least thirty (30f days prior to the date of termination specified in said notice. "Notice of Termination" shall be by certif iea mail addressed as set Eorth in paragraph 10 below. In the event this agreement 1s so terminated the CITY shall be compensated cn a prorata basis with respect to the portions of the project completed as of the date of termination. CITY ten,day written notice certified and^ addressed as^set forth in paragraph iG below in the event the WATER DISTRICT, its offices or employees viclate any provision of this agreement including but not limited to confidentiality and payment. CITY shall not be held L able for any damages sustained as a result o[ termination "by WATER DISTRICT, except Eor damages resulting from the CITY'S breach of agreement. 3i~ 10. Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written comrtiunication between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph i0. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this agreement: Jerry B. Fulwood I_lc p,lly (_ify Man3gc_ City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 George B. Blanchard, Jr. Assistant General Manager Cucamonga County Water District 9647 San Bernardino Rd. P.O. Bin 638 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight 1481 hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postaye prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. The ....~ .... .............m ~.- .,.__,._, ..______ ~_.. ..,_ __.-____.. .. .., ....., ......... ~. ., ..,,~ .... .. ........y... ..,. ,....,. ,.y. .....~,.... ,. '..... be George B. Blanchard, Jr. Any change in the WATER DISTRICT'S Project Manager must be with the CITY'S knowledge. I1 This agreement supercedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this ayreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Ayreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this P.greement shall be effective only >.f it is in r.. ~/O ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager -- FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer ~, SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON SIDEMALKS FOR PLAC IOA COURT WEST OF SIERRA MADRE ~' (continued from 9-6-891 '~ At the City Council meeting of September 6, 1989, Council recommended a neighborhood meeting, at the job site, with individual contact of all adjacent property owners on Placida Court to determine a width and shape of sidewalk that meets State Standard, and satisfies the property owners so they will voluntarily dedicate all necessary rights-of-way. This neighborhood meeting was held on September 12, 1989. The consensus of all the property owners or their designated representatives, was to construct a curb adjacent sidewalk six feet wide. BACK6N011ND/AMIILYSI S- As directed by Council on September 6, 1989, a neighborhood meeting at the project site was held on the evening of September 12th. All owners or their designated representatives were personally contacted during the meeting. They all wanted sidewalks. A plan showing a six foot adjacent sidewalk versus a sidewalk that varied from four feet where there were no obstructions, to one that was six feet wide where there were obstructions, was explained to all the owners. After seeing the plan and where the back of the sidewalk would be physically located, the consensus was to construct a six foot curb adjacent sidewalk. It is felt that the owners probably misunderstood where the back of the sidewalk would be and after we pointed out that location in the field, they were happy with a six foot wide sidewalk. This requires an additional five feet of right-of-way as outlined in our letter to Mr. Rogoff, dated August 23, 1989. All the property owners agreed to donate the additional five feet. Therefore, staff is proceeding with the design of the sidewalk, all legal and dedication documents, and negotiations with the Contractor for construction of the sidewalk. ,. Respec ,gl y ~~6mitted, I i ~ /C;: 'I RiNI,:MO:pam- Imo) CIT]' OF RANCHU Cl'('AbH)?~GA STAFF REPORT ~-..~ DATE: September 20, 1909 TO: Mayor, tdembers of City Council & City Manager ~ FROM: .Terry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BY CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913, DIVISION 72, SECTION 10104 ~, OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE) RECONMENDATiON: It is recommended that City Council consider the request by the Cucamonga County Water District for Council's approval to initiate preliminary formation procedures for a proposed sewer assessment district pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12, Section 70104 of the Streets and Highways Code. BACKGROUNDjANALYSI$: Tite f~luuicipai imps ovnmenL rct. of 1917, under Chapte l' 12, Section 10104 of the Streets and Highways Code states: "Iah nn n aAinrc_ is ini+iatad under this division by a legislativerebody other than that of a city or county, and beEoze the resolution of intention is adopted, the proposed resolution, together with a plot or map which shall indicate by a boundary line the extent of territory included in the proposed district, shall be subnli teed for approval of the iegi-iative Uody c t,`,e city ... II \ ~. A letter requesting approval by City Council of a proposed sewer assessment district by Cucamonga County Water District Eor a non-sewered area (East side of Carnelian, North of Hanya r.) has been reviewed by City Staff. he .,.,c ar~o;.ga ., ,. t,y ''„a ter ...strict will have to preceed with ..A i.a„e al l_ nL~li Foavln required in Eorming an rassessment district. Cityr Council's approval will allow the Cucamonga County Water District to proceed forward with the process. C,ty Council's approval would not eliminate the need to have the final construction plans reviewed by the City for. permit ~~~~~ City Council Staff Report CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT September 20, 1989 Page 2 purposes. Review of the final plans will address such issues as the proposed use of a City drainage easement across an existing lot which may conflict with the storm drainage intent and current use of that easement by the City. R e~pectf idly submit$ed, ~ ~7</~~l ~~ i erry B. Fulwc o'Ta Deputy City Manager Attachments JBF:de v' I RESOLUTION NO. ~~- ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE Cf[Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION AND BOUNDARY MAP FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 11 OF CUCAMONCA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Board of Directors oC Cucamonga County Water District (the "Dls[rtet") has initiated proceedings under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code o(the State o(Calitomla, to finance the aegwsitlon, construction and inslallatlon of certain sewer system improvements within a portion of the District to be designated Cor purposes of such proceedings as "Assessment District No. 11 of Cucamonga County Water District, County oC San Bernard/no, State of Calltomla. "and for [he levying, collection and enforcement of assessments to cover [he expenses of such vnprovemenis and the issuance and enforcement oC bonds to represent unpaid assessments: and Wf{EREAS, [he land to be assessed for such public Improvements Iles whhin the City of (rancho Cucamonga: and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10104 oC said Code, the Board of Directors of the Dislne[ has submitted to the City Cou nett of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City Council") (or Its approval a Resolution of Intention, together with a map which mdica[es by a boundary line the extent of territory included in the proposed assessment district, and 1t is necessary that the Clty Council approve saW Resolution of Intentimr and map before the Board of Directors can complete such proceedmgs: NOW, THEREFORE, BE rP RESOLVED, delemtined and ordered by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: '1'hc Kcsolutlon of ^rtenuon entitled "Resolution Declaring Intention to Order the Construction of Certain Improvements Within and for a Proposed Assessment District and the Payment oC Certain Expenses Incidental 'Phcrclo be Assessed Lto ^Pay~lhe'CoslsV and~.Expenses of~Such Improvements, and Determining That Bonds Shall be Issued in the Amount of the Unpaid Assessment Pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911" and the map tndtcattrtg by a boundary line the extent of territory Inchrded in the proposed assessment district and entitled, "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 L CUCAMONG.4 COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN DERNARUINO. S'CATE OP CAhIFORNIA." on file with the City Clerk are hereby approved. This resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 10104 of the Streets and highways Code of Stale of California to enable the Board of Directors of the Ulstri~•t to take each and every step required for or suitable for the eonsununauon of the work and the levymq. colleclmg and enforcement of the ;issessmculs to rover the expenses Thereof and the Issuance and enforcement of bonds to represent unpaid assessments. 9'he Citv Clerk Is hereby dlrerled to lrmsmll a rcrtifled copy of this Resohrtlon to the General Manager of Cucmnonga County Water District. 3~~~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT' NO. ll •-•-~~-~•'^~• NC~YdG, C0.iNlr p,Fp 0.[loiCl ryrmMM p,R'Vxu w l[G(NO --~° it ~Y"- ~ -- ,gd ':-: '~~~' ~...-,~ ,.c, } ..., v ~ '~. ~ ill a $ cn ~, ~. Y ~ .-. I ~ ~ -- }' It M1M pN.FNPp1 l / ~.unw ~r.n. ..~.. ,~ ~,...,~r..v.r,n wirer .. s ~I t •a. ,nvw a = ROBEnT NEW rr J. Yin-I•rr:A..r BEYEBLV E BNA DEN ~7. Cn..M M~r,n CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYD W. MICNA F.I A•,A.~~. CHARLES A WEBT GEORGE A, KUYKENDALL JEROME M. WrLBON July 26, 1989 Debra Adams, City Clerk City Of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. 0oX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Jack Lam, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BoX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: W.O. /4165 Sewer Assessment District All The Cucamonga County Water District has been requested to form an assessment district for the purpose of providing sewer service to a presently non-sewered area of our district. The request was made by a majority of, the residents in the proposed assessment orsrT~cc. The area in question is on the east side of Carnelian Street north of Banyon Street and contains streets known a, Reechwood, Emerald and Moonstone. The assessment aiea has been designated as Assessment District No, llr Cucamonga County Water District, County o[ San Bernardino, State of California, and is being formed pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 (commencing with 9100001 of the Streets and Highways Code. Pci or to our Board of Directors adopting a resolution of intention starting such proceedings, it must first obtain by resolution the approval of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. TO that end, we have included with this letter a copy of the proposed resolution'of intention plus a map indicating the boundary of the assessment district, Also included is a copy of Cucamonga County Water District's Resolution No. 1989-7-2 requesting the approval of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the formation of the proposed assessment district and the proposed resolution of intention and boundary map therefor. 3~~ C4CAMONGA COUNTY WMEII p9TRICT • I,O. 90% 939 • CUCAMONGA. CALIF 91)JO-09J9 . 1)IA, 99) )Sel Debra Adams •:ack Lam City of Rancho Cucamonga July 26, 1989 Page 2 Please schedule this request for City Council approval of the earliest opportunity. The proposed sewe[ system is currently under design and we anticipate construction to begin in April, 1990, if no delays are encountered in the formation process. Your attention to our request will be appreciated. Please contact the undersigned with any questions that you may Dave relative to this matter. Yours truly, ('UCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT W.~ael I "" o~~,i eini yiGm:ridi nauayei 1,WM: js Enclosures 3~s 29!1 R6SOLOTION NO. 1989-7-2 RBSOLDTIOII OP TRB 80ARD OP DIRECTORS OF COCANOIN-0A COURT? NATBR DISTRICT R6QUBSTIMG APPROVAL OP TOB CITY COUNCIL OP T5S CIT! OP RANC80 COCAMONGA POR TRB PORNATIOII OP PROPOSBD ASSBSSNBNT DISTRICT N0. 11. COCAMONOA COVNT)• MATBR DISTRICT, COONT! OP SAM BBRNARDINO, STATE OP GLIPORNIA~ ARD OP THE PROPOSED RBSOLDTION OP INTBNTION AND BOUNDART NAP TBERBPOR Q WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board of V Directors") of Cucamonga County water District (the Q "District') proposes to adopt a resolution of intention initiating proceedings for the formation of an assessment district within the boundaries of the District to be designated Assessment District No. llr Cucamonga County Water District, County of San Bernardino, State of California, pursuant to the provisions of [he Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 (commencing with @10000) of the Streets and Highways Code, for the purpose of financing certain sews[ system improvements within said assessment dietrict~ and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10104 of said Code, before the Board of Directors may adopt a resolution of intention initiating such proceedings, it must submit the proposed resolution of intention together with a map which shall indicate by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in the proposed assessment district to 3a~ 30t obtain the approval of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the formation of the proposed assessment district, said resolution of intention and said map; NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED, DSEERNINHD AND ORDERED BY THE HOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CDCANONGA CODNTY WATER DISTRICT AS FOLLONS: Section 1. The Board of Directors hereby requests Q U the approval of th e City Council of the City of Rancho Q Cucamonga of the formation of the proposed assessment district and the proposed resolution of intention and boundary msp therefor ae presented to the Board of Directors at the meeting at which this resolution is adopted. Section 2. The Secretary of the Board of Directors shall transit a certified Dopy of this resolution together with copies of the proposed resolution of Intention and map of the boundaries of the proposed assessment district to the Clty Clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga end the City Manager of [he Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and shall provide the City Council of said City with all information required -2- 3a7 3o;i by said City Council with respect to the proposed aseeea~ent district. ADOPTED this lath day of SDly, 1989. Ro ert Neu e , [ea ent r'i of the Board of Directors d U Q Attest: ~/~Xn of the Boar of Directors -3- 3~ CERTIFICATION I, LLOYD W, NIC HAE L, the duly appointed Secretary of the Hoard of Directors of Cucamonga County Water District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of said Uistrict at a r=gUlar meeting of said Board duly held on the 18th day of July _, 19 E9, by the following vote: AYES: Directors Neufeld, West, Wilson NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors Braden, Ruykendall IN WITNESS '.JHEREOP, I have he[eun[o set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Cucamonga County Water District, this 19th day of July , 19 89 ry~ ~ '~ oacd~ f Seal 'Directors 3a9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OP SAN BER NARDINO Gn t, Lloyd W. Michael, duly appointed Secretary of the Board of Directors of Cucamonga County Watec District DO HEREBY CERTIFY [hat the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1989-7-2 and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED: JDly 26 19 E9 (SEAL) •[® a[ ~ / e Boa Directors 3 30 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AND FOR A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND THE PAYMENT OF CERTAIN EXPENSES INCIDENTAL THERETO PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913, DESCRIBING THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES OF SUCK IMPROVE- MENTS, AND DETERMINIWG THAT BONDS SHALL BE ISSUED ZN THE AMOUNT OF THE UNPAID ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO THE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") of Cucamonga County Water District ("the "Dlatrict") proposes to form an assessment district under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets and HLghways Code, Eor the construction and installation of the improvements which are hereinafter generally described; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors hereby finds: (i) that the public interest, convenience and necessity require: (a) the Construction and installa- tion of certain sewer system improvements; (b) the acquisition of certain land, easements and rights-of-way necessary therefor; and (e) appurtenances and appurte- nant work and incidental coats and expenses in connec- tion therewith; (ii) that the project is Feasible; and (iii) that the lands to be assessed will be able to 331 carry the burden of the proposed assessments and to pay the coats and expenses thereof; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND OA DEAED by the Board of Directors of Cucamonga County Water District as follows: Section 1. Description of Improvements. The public interest, convenience and necessity require, and it is the intention of the Board of Directors, pursuant to the provisions of Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, commonly known as the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913." to order the construction of the improvements, together with incidental costs and expenses in connection with the proposed assessment district, for the benefit of the lands within the exterior boundaries of the proposed assessment district, hereinafter referred to as the "improvements," all in the District, more particularly described ae follows: (a) Construction and installation of sewer system improvements, including approximately 5,270 linear feet of 8-inch sewer mains, approximately 13 manholes, approximately 31 house laterals and appurtenances and appurtenant work and incidental expenses in connection therewith; and ib) The acquisition of land, easements and rights- of-way necessary for the construction and operation of said improvements. -2- ~ 3a Section 2. Description of Assessment District. Said improvements will be of direct benefit to properties and lands within a district which is he rohV der l.a red to be the district benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said district shall be known as Assessment District No. 11, Cucamonga County Water District, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and shall be all that part of the District having the exterior boundaries as shown on a mep of the district entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 11, CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOr STATE OF CALIFORNIA," (the "Assessment nistrict") which map is on file in the office of the Fecretacy of the Board of Directors. Reference la hereby m~.;o r,. aa;.; man fnr a Eall and complete description of the Assessment District and said map shall govern Eor all details ae to the extent of the Assessment District. Section 3. Report of Engineer. The proposed improvements are hereby referred to Camp, Dresser 6 McKee, ?nc. (the "Engineer of Work"), and said Engineer of Work is hereby directed to make and file with the Secretary of the Poard of Directors a report (the "Report") in writing containing, insofar as applicable, the following: (a) Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements which shall indicate the class and type of improvements to be provided for each sons within the Assessment District] -3- 333 (b) A general description of works or appliances already installed and any other property necessary or con- venient Eor the operation of the improvements, if the works, appliances, or property are to be acquired as part of the improvements; (c) An estimate of the cost of the proposed work and improvements and of the cost of lands, rights-of-way, easements, and incidental expenses in connection therewith, including any coat of registering bonds; (d) A diagram showing: (i) the exterior boun- daries of the Assessment District, (ii) the boundaries of ttie zones within the Assessment District, and (iii) the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within the Assessment District. Each subdivision or parcel, including each separate condominium interest, ae defined in Section 783 of the Civil Code, shall be given a separate number upon said diagram; (e) A proposed assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several subdivisions or parcels of land in the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said subdivisions, respectively, from the improvements. The assessment shall refer to such su bdivisione by their respective numbers as assigned pursuant to subdivision (d) of this Section 3. -4- ~3 Section 4. Gonda. It is hereby determined and declared and notice ie hereby given that serial bonds to represent and be secured by the unpaid amount of the assess- ment which will be levied to pay the costs and expenses of the improvements, and to bear interest at the rate of not to exceed 12 percent per annum, shall be issued in the manner provided by Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Improvement Act of 1911, and the last installment of such bonds shall mature not later than 20 years Erom the second day of January next succeeding the next September first after their date. Section 5. Division of Land and Bonds. The procedures set forth in Chapter 5.5 (commencing with $ 6490) of Part 5 of Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code shall no E„ttnwod fnr division of land and bonds. Section 6. Disposition of Surplus Funds. If after completion of the improvements and the payment of all claims from the improvement Eund the Board of Directors shall determine that a surplus remains in the improvement fund by reason of the assessment and any supplemental assessment Levied for said improvements, any such surplus shall be used as follows: la) For transfer to the general fund of the Dis- r.rict of an amount not to exceed the lesser of 51,000.00 or five IS) percent of the total amount expended Erom the improvement Eund; -5- 335 (b) As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assessment, in the manner provided in Section 10427.1 of the Streets and Highways Code; or (c) For the maintenance of the improvements. Section 7. Proceedings Under the Special Assess- ment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. The Board of Directors intends to comply with the requirements of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, Division 4 (commencing with $ 2800) of the Streets and Highways Code, by proceeding under Part 7.5 (commencing with g 2960) of said Division 4. In addition to the matters provided for in Section 3 hereof, there shall be included in the Repozt provided for therein the following information: ~a) the total amount, ae near as may 6e deter- mined, of the total principal of all unpaid special assessments required or proposed to be levied under any completed or pending assessment proceedings, other than that rontemplated in the instant proceedings, which would require an investigation and report under said act against the total area proposed to be assessed; and (b) the total true value, as near as may be deter- mined, of the parcels of land and improvements which ace proposed to be assessed. Pursuant to Sections 2961 and 2980 oF. the Streets and Highways Code, such total true value shall 6e the Eull cash value of each land and improvements -6- 334 as defined in Article RIII A of the California Constitution and as shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of the county of San Bernardino. Section 8. Property Owners Taking Contract. It is hereby determined and declared that the public interest will not be served by allowing the owners of the lands assessed or liable to be assessed, or their agents, to take a contract for the installation of the improvements. Section 4. Adjustment of Grade on Private Property. Whereever it is necessary to eliminate any disparity in level or size between said improvements and private property, it is in the public interest and more economical to so such work on private property than to adjust the work on public property to eliminate such disparity. Adopted this 18th day of July, 1989. RO ERT E. NEUFELD President of the Hoard of Directors ATTEST: LLOYD W. MI HAEL Secretary of the Board of Directors -7- BJ90040A ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1959 TO: Mayor, Members o(Clty Councd & Clty Manager FROM: Jerry Fulwood. Deputy City Manager S[JB,JECr: CONSIDERATION OF POIICY ON ANNEXATIONS OF F[TIlIRE DEVELOPMEh7IS INTO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY FACILI77ES DISTR1Cr 88-2 PROPOSED BOUNDARY RF.COMMENDA170N: I[ Is recommended that City Councd consider adopting a policy that would ttgWre [afore developments m the North Ethvanda area to be conditioned to 6e annexed into the current Caw Enforcement Community Faclllttes DISIriM 88-2. I39C1SS'a$Q1,11$+ On Aprll 19, 1989 Clty Council adopted the necessary Resolutions inttlating prelhnlnary procedures and setting a Public Hearing for the fonnatlon o[ the drainage and Law En(oreemmt Communtyy Facllilies Dfstrict No. BB-2. The Drainage portion o[ the District has been structured for acqulsltlon of Infrastmctures. The Law Enforttment portion of the District will be for operations and maintenance purposes with an initial special tax ranging between $112.00 and $432.00 annuaity based upon the square footage of the home. On June 21, 1989 Clly Council approved fortnatlon of the Community FaCllltles Dlstrkt 88-2, a.,.t a,rthnrived the Irvv of a srarfal tax [n finance Drafna¢e Caoltal facWties. Additlonany, a Law Enforcement Community Facdllles bistrlcl was formed which mcluded three tracts within the North Etlwanda Highland area. However. City Council did riot approve the policy to condhton and annex all future developments mlo the Law Enforeement portion of the District. ANALYSIS: In creating a city wide Law Enforcement Community Faelllties District of vacant undevUoped property there Is no plausible way of allocating costs to the smaller undeveloped parcels kr the City. Therefore, Staff has modified its prior recommendation to condition all undeveloped propertlos within the Ctty to annex into the current Law Enforcement District. The new boundary area would be limited to [he North Etlwanda area. Thts boundary and general location Is a more manageable area. Staf[ recommends creation of a Communltp Fac91t1ea District In the North Etlwanda region over the undeveloped land that encompasses the areas bounded an the west by Deer Creek Channel up to the Intersection of Deer Creek Channel and Banyan Avenue thence easterly along Banyan Avenue to Rochester Avenue thence southcity along Rochester Avenue to the Intersection of Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue then bounded on ilia south by Highland Avenue on the east by the Ctty limits and on ilia north by the Sphere of Influence up to the Intersection of the Sphere o(Iniluence with Deer Creek Channel. City Council Stall Report [AW ENFORCEMENC C.F.D. 88-2 September 20, 1989 Page 2 SUMMARY In summary, Exhibit A reDects the vacant undeveloped parcels fn the Clty and the recommended eventual annexation boundary for the Iaw Enfomement Community Fac8ltles Dlstnct 88-2. pecUully6ubmitted. eny B. Fulwood/ ~~r~ Deputy City Manager JBF:Jmf Attachment 339 ----~- CITI' OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 TO: City Council FROM: Pamela J. Wright and Deborah N. Browr. Council Subcommittee Recycling/Solid Waste ~. . ~;,, SUBJECT: Establishment of a Citizens Environmental Management Commies ion RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council transition the Cit ixe ne Advisory commission into the Cit izena Environmental Management Commission, and amend ordinance No. 307 to reflect structure changes of the transit Lon. BACKGROUND At the July 19, 1989 Council meeting, the Council Subcommittees for the Cit izena Advisory Commission and Recycling/Solid waste and staff were tlirected to meet with the Citizens Advisory Commies ion (CAC) to die cues trans it ioning the CAC into an environmental commission. One member from each Council Subcommittee and staff met with the CAC on Thursday, August 22, 1989. This meeting ores advertised ae a Special Adjourned Meeting of the CAC with the specific purpose of discussing transit ion ing the focus of the CAC to an environmental Comm iseion. The CAC endorsed the trans it icn of the cAC to the cit izena Environmental Management commission. The motion carried 6-0-2 (two Commies ionera were absent). The two Comm iesionere who were absent from the August 22, 1989 meeting were contacted, and have advised they are in favor of trans it ioning the CAC into an enviroccent al commisa ion. The general feeling of the commissioners 1s that they Fali ve fhia ,a aif ivc mn and fetf fhe entire rnmmnnity wnu l_tl n__ w fr_nm thisetraneit ion.a ~ ~~O Est abl iahment of a Citizens Environment al Management Commission September 20, 1959 Page Two STRUCTURE The suggested structure of the Citizens Environmental Nanagement Commleelon would be a working commies ion wits a focus on environmental issues (i.e., recycling, eo lid waste, air, water) with the intent of the Commission continuing Co be advisory to both the City Council and other Connieaiona. It le auggeated that the Commission membership be made up of eleven members at this time with out geographic designations. Additionally, the Council SuDCOmmittee recoamende the membership number be reviewed far effect iveneee in a 3-6 month time period. The joint quarterly subcommittee meetings with the Council Subcommittee, Chair, Vice- Chair and staff would continue for the pu rpo ee of reviewing the work program of the Commission. It is suggested the council Subcommittee for the environmental commie eion be made up of the current Council Subcommittee for Recycling/Solid Waste with e designated alternate £rom the current CAC Council Subcommittee. The Council Subcommittee for Recycling/Solid Waste believes this transit toning will only increase the involvement of the community In the decie ion making process end edvance citizen issues. ReeRectful ly Submitted, ,y ~ Y?( 1` .:.~F. vif~'~. 9~..1.~-mac, Pamel~ight Deborah N. Brown Council Subcommittee for Recycling/Solid Waste PJW:DNR;jle 0701.11/89-644 ~c/,~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAffiONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 20, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: William J, Alexahder, Councilmember~ SUBJECT: CITY COVNC IL COMPENSATION l~y The compensation of City Councilmembere has not been revised to keep up with the schedule provided by State law, which bases the amount on population. The position of City Counci lmember entalle incucr ing ezpanaee not reimbursable during the course of our tenure. The many night meetings and functions that one needs to attend, in order to be effective, are numerous antl involve considerable coot ributione of our own resources, such ae varat ion time, baby eihting, and other expense e. While the poa it ion of Counci lmember ie indeed a ^voluntary" position and is not, nor should it be, compensated ae a full time job, our City should at least keep up with the minimum schedule outlined by State law. Revising this now (although it will not affect this present Council), would be prudentr not only co weep pace, uuc cw more adequately balance the coat contributed by Counc ilmembere in performing their responeihil ities. I would like the Council to cons itler adopt inq first reading of the attached ordinance updating the compeneat ion schedule, bringing it consistent with State law, and to apply to the next soated City Council. W.lA/dja .zt tacFUd ~~ 0 ~ O T T q ?~ Y H ~ Y q N O U y p Y K C C d m H 4 O 0 6 0 .] 'y~ 9 d '0 C w 4 q g H q O Y d N F d "~ d / E O O O O O O O O O O H N Y~ m A 0 O O O O O O O O O O ~~ c N O h d O O O O O O O O O O U m~ K O ~ O N O O O O O O C d (L Y d £ m va N 1/~ Vf In IR N N N N N q 'O W H Y .w. K C J U1 ti ti OI ~I O W, J 5 N .] E H p U O O O O G y E O O O O O O 00 N pN O O O O O h O H "~ ~ N ~O W 1~ H N ~ U N \ N N ~'1 C O c ~ ~ \ \ N c 0 O O O O O O O O O O N W~V O O O O O O O O O O 00 a o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 Ni o o N o 0 o n o 0 0 a; ~ N n ~ ~ n ~( u N N N 1/1 N N N N N N N G F~ O m n m s n o w ~ d In h O J1 N ~O 0 0 0 o a o ~ a a o o o e o rv o 0 o ~ ~o r ~o N u~ N c o o c E m V U 4 H q U Oi C q q O O Y 0 U 'O c O C ~N C q d L O c q Y O 4 q C t0 U'. U C Y q Y / q 0 G C O C q i~ 'O 4 C q L o . U O ~ d O q K U Z O ~ Z U O K U h d r N ~1 TJ N U a A 7 a K N E c q c u d G b• a F 0 V 4i/ 'S EF- 1 3-~='? T H11 1 1 : 13 P1 r0F 1 P1 .aN .il r-~F•C ='r N3Y I F ~~2 .J4 ORDINANCE NO. -IO-~ AN ORDINANCE 08 THE CITY COUNCIL OP T88 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA AMENDING BECTIONB 2.16.020 AND 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO COCAMONOA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAININd TO BALARIEB POR MEHHEAB OF THE CITY COUNCIL. A. Reolt4la. (i) California Government Code Section 36516 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "(a) A city council may enact an ordinance providing that each member of the city council shall receive a salary, the amount of which shall be determined by the following schedule: n . "(a) in clt iea over 75,000 up to and including 150,000 in population, up to and including six hundred dollars ($600) per month. "For the purposes oP this sectlen the population shall be determined by the last preceding federal census, or an estimate validated by the Department of Finance." (11) The population of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga exceeds 75,000 and is less than 150,000 Sn accordance with the most recent census estimates validated by the State Aepartment of Finance. H. ordinanae. IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS: @ectlon ].. Suction 2.16.020 of Che Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as Pollowa: "2.16.020 Population estimate. As of Septembor 1, 1989, the latest estimate of the population of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, made by the State Department of Finance, is one hundred and four thousand (106,000)." 1 ~~~~ SEP- I J-39 T H!: 1 1 : 1 l9r F' V :9 HN .'.: rF'C L'~'Fl 9~F I F _ .3 + .~4 Section j. Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: ' "j_ 16.034 Salary amo apg waiver A. Eaoh member of the City Council shall receive as salary the sum of SSx Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per month. The salary shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner as salaries are paid to other officers and employees of the City. 8. Any membeY of the City Council may receive the authorized increase in salary, or any portion thereo P, as provided Sn this section by enactment of Ordinance No. /O -C'~ by filing a written request for said increase, or portion thereof, with the City Clsrk of the City of Aancho Cucamonga. Such request may be filed nt any time and shall continue in effect until the and of the Council Members term of office or until a withdrawal of the written request is filed with Che City Clerk.^ Section ,~. The salary increase provided for in this ordinance shall become available to all members of this Council when any member of this Council next begins a new term of office. Section g. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoution of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its adoption at least once in Thg Da11v Aenort, a newspaper of general circulation published 1n the City of Ontario and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1989. PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ _ day of Mayor i, DEBRA J. ADAMS, Ctty Clerk of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a reguiar meeting of the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day o! 1989, and was finally passed at a regular-meeting of tRe City Council of the City oP Rancho Cucamonga held on the ~ day of _ _ __, 1989, by the following vote: ~U.~" CI"PY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA c~cAM1fp1, MEMORANDUM z~?° ~V\\`',, x~~ ~~~I~ ~~~ ~ z V _ ~ III =~9iT -._ DATE: September 20, 1989 To: Mayor and Members of the City Cou nl!clIil yy FROM: Charles J. Buqu et, Councilmember U~~~C^ SUBJECT: REVISION OP COUNTY ORDINANCES RBOARDINC OUST ANp EROSION CONTROL As you are we 11 aware, the City has e-psrienced some devastating winds in the recent past that has prompted a call for more stringent voile control measu rea during the Santa Ana condition months. In my role ae the City's soils and eroe ion control representative, I have been in frequent communicatiene with the County Agricultural Commissioner's et aff in this regard. Revisions to the existing ordinance to strengthen enforcement procedures, ae well as expand the area wirhin the "dust control area", have been drafted for submission to the Board of Supervi aors. Ae a good port Lon of the expansion area lies to the north of the City bound arle e, and within our ephera of influence, nnn Irv ar aff .,..td tao «„ fi.a« m..« «e:a .~a..m ~«:..., «., a,e r, ..,,.... to obtain their input, and hcpefully, support for the changes. In reviewing the proposed area of expa neion with City and County etaf f, it appears a proactive approach to eliminating problems experienced in recent years during heavy winds is appropriate. City staff also is supportive of the expane ion because of the pceent ial for imminent development within the sphere area. I have asked Mr. Tom Ra ird from the Agricultural Commissioner's O£f ice [o attend the September 20, 1989 Council meeting and provide proposal details to the City Council foc cons cderation and response. As with all matters, I remain available by contactinS me at your earliest convenrence. CJB/d ja 6