HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/11/01 - Agenda Packet
•
CITY
_ COUNCIL
A G E N D A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
lst and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m.
[4overUer 1, 1989
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga
•~•
City Councilmembero
Dennis L Stout. Mayor
Pamela J. Wright, envru~nmemaee
Deborah N. Brown, Mayoe Prvrem
Charles 1. Buquet, couno;Imerneee
'William J. Alexandeq eounvnmemDee
•~•
Jack Lam, enr nm~oxe.
i
James L. Markman, cm~ Arcoenrv
Debra J. Adams, Cuy C/erk
City Office; 989.1651 Lions Put 980-J143
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
1111 ilea auheittid for the Citp Council Ageada cost De in
crating. The daadlina for aubeitting ths{e aloe is 5:00 p.e.
on the Midne{dip prior to the snseting. Ths Citp Clerk's
Office receive{ ill such itas.
A. CALL TO ORDER
i. Piedge of Allegiance to Plag.
2. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _,
Brown _, and Wright
B. ANNOUNC~N'f3/PAESBNTATIONS
1. Present ai ion of 10-year Pin to Dave Leonard. (COntioued
f roe October 38, 1989)
2. Pieeent at ion of 30-year Pin to Tino Torrez.
C CONNONICATIONS pRON T'B6 PUBLIC
TAie is the taco and play for the general public to address
the CiLp Council. etaG law prohibits the Citp Council frw
addrauiag sap issue not privioualp imluded On the Agenda.
The Citp Council up receive teetieoap and wt the alter for
a {nbaequenc eeeciu3. ~.vw•n„L. ~.~ -„ __ ~~-'t t!a ~n five
einutee per iadividuel.
D. CONBENT CALENDAR
The following Conaaat Glandat iteea are expected to 6e
routine and non-coatroveraial. Thep will be acted upon by the
Council et ono ties without discussion. Anp i!a uy bs
zewved by a .eeuncileseber or caber of the audience for
diacuasion.
3. Approval of Minutes:
September 26, 1989
~ ~ September 28, 1989 (BUquet, Wright absent)
OoWher 1, 1989
October 30, 1989 (Wright absent)
October 18, 1989
2. Approval of Werrente, Register Noa. 10/18/89 end 1
10/25/89, end Payroll ending 10/12/89 for the total
amount of $1,216,139.75.
T'tnr _. ,
L)~
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 1~
ae of October 25, 1989.
4. Approval to authorize the ^NOtice Inviting eide^ for the 1/
West Beryl Park Improvements to bB funded from Park
Development Pund 20-4532-8015.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-493 Lg
A AHSOLOTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORNZA, APPROVZNG
PLANS AND SPHCIPICATI ONS POR THE "WEST BERYL
PAPA IMPROVHZOiNTS" ON CARNELIAN AT HIGHLAND
AVHNVH IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORISING AND
DIRECTING Tfffi CITY CLHAA TO MVSRTISE TO
RBCEIVB BIDS
S. Approvnl to authorise end request proposals for design 24
consultant services Co develop plane and specifications
for Don Tlburclo Tapia Perk.
6. Approvnl to award the Milliken Avenue Median and Monument 27
Improvement Project from 4th to 6th Street to Valley
Greet Landscape for the amount of $437,823.26, to be
funded with senutiEication Funds Aceosnt Noe. 21-4667-
8814 and 21-4647-8739 (FY 89/90).
A
Improvement e, Phase IV-A, withouC
prejudice.
e. Approval to procure coptere through a 5-Year 30
Lease/Purchase Plan.
9. Approval to award and execute a Professional services 31
Agreement (CO 89-174) with Herman Rlnanel and Associates
for the preparation of traffic signal plane for the
intereacT~gne of Spruce Avenue at Terra Viete Parkway,
Archibald Avenue at Highth street and Vineyard Avenue at
Arrow Highwny (upgrade) in the amount of 516,500.00
($15,000.00 plan lOt contingency) to be funded from TDA,
Artirle a funds Sn the following amounts: Account 12-
4637-8918, $5,390.00; Account 12-4637-8914, $5,390.00;
i eud Aocosnt 32-4637-A915, $5, 72n.00. ~
1"+~
n~~..
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
10. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-175) for the Traffic 33
Signal and Safety Lighting at the intereectione of Haven
Avenue and Soventh Street and Archibald and Lemon Avenuee
awarded t0 Hovey Blectrie Eor the aawunt of 5231,395.00
($192,177.00 plus 104 contingency) to be funded Prom Se
325 Pund Account Noa. 12-4637-8911, 12-4637-59]2,
respectively, awarded SeptmnRer 20, 1989 (PY 89/90).
11. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 89- ~ 34
106) for Sierra Madre and Placide Court for construction
of sidewalk on Placida Court.
12. Approval to execute Amendment to Contract (CO 88-085) for 35
Code Snforcement Representative.
13. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 43
Improvement (CO 89-176) between Jack A. and Janice S.
Maraee, Sr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street
Improvements located along tRe north portion of the
Mareee parcel fot the 19th Street project from Archibald
Avenue to Haven Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 59-494 44
A ABSOLUTION OF TNS CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY
OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGAEBIffiNT FOA INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
_rnanwvMewT AROM ,TACK R. AND JANIC6 E. MARSSE,
SR. AND AUTHORIZING TF~ HAYOA AND CITY CLERE
TO SIGN SANE
14. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 45
Improvement (CO 59-177) between John P. and Emma J. Amodt
and tRe City of Rancho Cucamonga fot Street Improven~ente
located along the nortR portion of the Amodt parcel for
the 19th Street psoj act from Archibald Avenue to Haven
Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-495 46
A RESOLUTION OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY
OP MNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
~ AOAEEMENT FOA ZNSTAI.ZATIOH OF PUBLTC
IMPROVEMENT PROM JOXN P. AND EHMA J. AMObT AND ~
AUTNORISI NO TXE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN
SAME
7L' 7
k~,
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
Q1
15. Approval to execute Agreement for Inetalleiion of Public
Improvement (CO 89-178) between cnrrie Candice Johnson
Hall and the City of Rencho Cucamonga for Street
Improvements located along the north portion of the Hall
parcel for the 19th Street project from Archibald Avenue
to Haven Avenue.
46
RBSOLITf ION NO. 89-496
A RSSOLV2ION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY
OF AANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGRBBl/6NT POR INSTALLATION OF PVBLIC
IMPROVBMBNT PAOM CAARIB CANDICB JOHNSON HALL
AND AUTHORIZING THB MAYOR AND CITY CLERR TO
SIGN SAt@
16. Approval to execute Agreement for Inetnllaticn of Pu61ic 49
Improvement (CO 89-179) between Lawrence and Hlvira M.
ornelae and the City of Rencho Cucamonga for SLreei
Improvements located along the north portion of the
Ornelae parcel for the 19th Street project from Archibald
Avenus to Naven Avenue.
50
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-497
A ABSOLUTION OF TNH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
IMPROVEMENT .PROM LAWRENCE -AND -BLVIRA--M-
ORNELAS AHD AUTHORISING TFDS MAYOR AND CITY
CLBAR TO SIGN SAME
17. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 51
Improvement (m 89-180) between William D. Angel and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Improvements located
along the north portion of the Angel parcel for the 19tH
StresL Pr~ect from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue.
S2
RESOLUTION NO. 89-498
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OP RANCNO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
~ AGP.BBMBNT FOP. INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC ~
IMPROVEMENT PROM WILLIAM D. ANCBL AND
AUTHORIEING THH MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO SIGN
SAMB
Y- l l~/
V ~
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
18. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 53
Improvement (CO 89-181) between Marcus B. Telada and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk improvements
located along the northern portion of the Talada parcel
for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court project.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-499 ~
A RESOLUTION OF TRB CITY COUIiCIL OF Tim CITY
OP RANCEIO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGABE!ffiNT POR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
IMPAOVEMBNT PROM MARCUS B. TBLADA ANO
AUTNOAIEING THB MAYOR AND CITY CLERA TO SIGN
SAiffi
19. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 55
Improvement (CO 89-182) between Meriberto O. Oliva and
Roeie M. Oliva and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
sidewalk improvements located along the northern portion
of the Oliva parcel for the Sierre Madre/Placida Court
projacL.
RESOLVT`ION NO. 89-500 56
A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OB THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTPORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
~ AGAERDINT FOA INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
M.~OLIVA •AND AUTHORI SING vTiB MAYOR NAND CITY
CLEAR TO SIGN SAME
20. T.pproval to execute Agreement for Iretellat ion of Public 5~
Improvement (CO 89-183) between Stanley 0. Cabunoc and
I Roee M. G. Cabunoc and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
', sidewalk improvemania located along the southern portion
'~, of the S. Cebunoc parcel for the Sierre Madre/Placida
I, Coort project.
RESOLVTION NO. 89-501 58
A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALL PORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
i i g0ovvunym POR IHSTALLATICM ... PUBLIC ~
IHPROVBMBNT FROM BTANLBY C. CAHUNCC AND ROSE
M. C. CABUNOC AND AUTHORI EING TMB MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO 9IGN SAME
J" ,
} ~*.
41`FS
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
21. Approval to exeaute Agreement for ZnetallaLion of Public 59
Improvement (CO 89-184) between Pedro C. Cabunoc and
Leonila C. Cabunoc and the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga for
sidewalk improvements located along the eoutheaetern end
southern portion of the P. Cabunoc parcel for the Sierra
Medra/Placida Court project.
60
AESOLUTZON NC. 89-502
A RSSOLVTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OP RANCf70 CUCANONGA, CALI PORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGA88MENT POA INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
IMPR0VE7ffiNT FROM P8DA0 C. CABUNOC AND LBONILA
C. CABUNOC AND AUTHORISING TNB MAYOR AND CITY
CLBRN TO SIGN SA7~
22. Approval to execute Agreement for Inetsllatlon of Public 61
Improvement (CO 89-185) between Nary D. Asebedo and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk Lmpcovemente
located along LAe eoutaezn portion of tae AeeDedo parcel
for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court project.
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-503 62
A ABSOLUTION OP TMB CITY COUNCIL OP Ti>Z CITY
OP IVINCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIAr ACCEPTING AN
AGRBElfBNT POR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
_-_ .. _ Kiwi rii
nl -
i
iuunv
_
,
.
,.
~ ,u,u
AUTHORISING THB MAYOR AND CITY CLERE TO SIGN
SAHB
23. Approval to execute Agreement Poi Inetelletion of Public 63
Lmpzovement (CO 89-186) between Wa lLer F. Gage, Jr. and
Eathleen A. Gage and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
sidewalk improvements located along [ha southern portion
of the Gaga parcel for the Sierra Metlre/Plecitle Court
project.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-504 64
A ABSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALLPOPNIA, ACCEPTLNC AN
~ ~ hOREE7WNT POR I77STALLAT2077 OF FUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT PAOM WALTER P. OAGB, JR. AND
RATHLBEN A. OAGE AND AUTHORISING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLEAN TO SICN 8AH8
~,
41
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
24. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 65
Improvement (CO 89-187) between Gary D. Bird and Sherri
Lomond antl the city of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk
improvements located along the southern portion of Che
Bird/Lomond parcel for the sierra Madre/Placitln Court ~
project.
66
RBSOLVTION NO. 89-505
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGRBE!ffiNT POR INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
INPROVSMEHI' PAOM GARY D. BIRD AND SHBRRI
LENOND AND AVTHORIZING THB NAYOA AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN SANE
25. Approval to execute Agreement Eor Installation of Public 67
Improvement (CO R9-188) Detween David J. Rogoff and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Eor sidewalk improvements
located along tAe northern portion of the Rogoff parcel
for the sierra Madre/Placida Court project.
68
RESOLUTION NO. 99-506
A R83OLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
AGRSEl03NT POA INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC
•VOOMrvw.nn _-. .... .. . ILLW
`
c
AUTHORISING THE NAYOA
AND CITY CLBRE
TO SIGN
SANS
26. Approval to execute Agreement for In etallation of Public 69
Improvement (CO 89-189) between Michael J. Judge and
Nancealee A. Judge and the City of Rancho Cucamonga far
eidewalK improvmaente located along the northern portion
of the Judge parcel for the sierra Nzdze/Placitln Court
project.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-507 7O
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN
i ACRRRMRNT FOP. T_NSTALLiPION OF FUIILIC ~
IMPAOVBMBNT PAOM MICNABL J. JUDGE AND
NANCBALEE A. JUDGE AND AUTHORISING THB MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN BAMB
Y~
:_y ,. `,
4~
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989
PAGE
27. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public ~1
Improvement (CO 89-190) between Stephen 6. Filer end the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk improvements
located along the northern portion of the Piler parcel
for the Sierra Nadre(Placida Court project.
RSSOLVTION NO. 89-508 )Z
A RBSOLOTIOH OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP AANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ACCBPTING AN
AGAEH!ffiNT FOR INSTALLATION OF PVBLIC
IMPROVBMENT PROM STEPHEN 6. PILEA AND
AVTHORIZIN6 THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERB TO SIGN
SAME
28. Approval to authorize the assignment of an Adult Cro6e ing ~3
Guard at the intersection of Vintage Drive and sierra
Croat Loop for Caryn Elementary School.
29. Approval to open escrow with Mary Phyllis Bonehire, et. ~4
al., for purcAaae of lend at 12951 Base Line Roatl, to
obtain the right-of-say for the Baee Line Road Widening
Project between Victorin Park Lane end Interstate 15 fot
$74,750.00, plus escrow coats of $5,000.00 to be paid
from Syeteme Peea Account No. 22-6637-8730-4117 and
authorize the City Engineer to execute all necessary
documents.
30. Approval to open escrow with Waller A. Flariani and 75
Evelyn J. Ploriani for purchase of a portion of land at
7767 Vineyard Avenue, Aencho Cucamonga, to obtain right-
of-way for the Cucamonga 8tozm Drain (Phase I) Project
for $1,344.00, plus escrow costa of $1,000.00 to be paid
f<om Drainage Pund Account No. 23-4fi37-8847-6603-4117,
and authorize the City Bngineer to execute and validate
escrow documentB on behalf of the City.
31. Approval to open escrow with Feltz 8. Quesada and 78
Victoria R. Queeade for purchase of a portion of land at
7745 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, to obtain the
right-of-way foz the Cucamonga Storm Drain (Phase I)
Project for $8,784.00, plus escrow costa of $1,000.00 to
i be paid front Drainage Fund Acncgnt No. 23-4537-8sd7-4.',03- ~
~ 4117, and authorize the Clty Engineer to execute and
validate escrow documents on behalf of the City.
32. Approval to vacate n portion of Jasper Street - Tentative 81
Trnct No. 12820 - located south of Highland Avenue and
west of Carnelian 6troet approximately 13 foot wide and
130 feat long.
{-,,~~y
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1939
PAGE
82
RESOLUTION NO. 89-509
A RESOLUTION OP TNH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
08 RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING T!!B VACATION OP A POF.TION OP JASPER
STREET
3?. Agprovnl of Parcel Map and ordering the Annexet ion to 85
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for Parcel Hap 12122,
located on the east aide of Rochester Avenue north Of the
A.T. S S.F. Railroad Tracks, submitted by the Fullmer
Company.
86
RESOLUTION NO. 89-510
A RESOLUTION OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL HAP NUMEEA 12121 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP
NO. 12121)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-511 87
A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TN6 CITY
OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPOANIAr ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIOHTIN6
NAP 12121 ........... ...... ...... ..............
34. Approval of Hap, the Vacation of a portion of Rinlock 90
Avenue, execution of Improvement AgzeemenL, Improvement
Security and ordering the Annexation Lo Landscape
Maintenance District No 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Noe. 1 entl 2 for Parcel Mnp 11695, located on
the south aide of Devon Street at Kin lock Avenue, .~
sybmitte~y James O'Brien.
RESOLVTION NO. E9-512 91
A RESOLUTION OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY
OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
~ ~ ~ PA?rPL NPn NlR.9EP. 13595, 1HPP.OY?YENT ~
AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND TNS
VACATION OP RINLOCR AVENUE
~7~,
~~
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 10
RHSOLUTION NO. 89-513 92
A RESOLUTION OP TiB CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORRZA, ORDHRING TNH
ANNEXATION OP CHRTAIN TBRRITORY TO INiDSCAPE
HASNTBNANCS DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 9TREBT LIGHTING
HAINTENAHCB DISTAI Cf NOS. 1 AND 2 POA PARCEL
MAP 11685
35. Approval of Nap, execution of Improvement Agreement, 95
Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 13930,
located on Wilecn Avenue between Aellmen Avenue and
Amethyst Street submitted by Winbrook Development,
Incorporated.
96
RB60LOTION NO. 89-514
A RBSOLUTION 08 TR8 CITY COUNCIL OB THB CITY
OP RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIAr APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AORHBMHNT, INPROVBIBNT SSCORITY,
AND FINAL MAP OP TMCT NO. 13930
ABSOLUTION NO. 59-515 i 9I
A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL O! TRB CITY
Jr :.:.i:~.:J wf.L:iG:.6:., .::.i.i~GCv.inr AiwcnIiio I'^".
ANNEXATION O8 CBRTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPH
MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 POR TRACT
13930
36. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement 100
security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 7 for Tracts 13565-1 thru -4,
located o01'de north aide of Toth street and east of
Wardman Bullock Roed, eubmlttod by Standard Pacific of
Orange County.
RESOLUTION NO. 59-516 101
~ ~ ~ A RXSOLDTZOH CP Tlib CSTY CO'JNCZL OF TIE CSTY ~
OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIN0
SMPROVEHENT AGRBElENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
-OR TPACTS 13565-1 TNRU -4
PAGE
City Council Agenda
Rovember 1, 1989 11
R860LVTI0N NO. 89-517 102
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY
OP AANCRO COCANONGA, CALIFORNIAr OADBRING THE
ANNS%ATION OP CERTAIN TBRAITOAY TO LANDSCAPE
MAZMTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 FOR TRACT 13565-1
T'®1U -4
37. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 107
Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance DLetrict No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance Diatzici Noe. 1 end 6 for DR 88-43, located
on the north aide of Sharon Circle, east of Hezmoea
Avenue submitted by Garrison Management, Incorporated.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-518 108
A RESOLUTION OP TRB CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVSlBNT AGRBEMSNT AND IMPAOVBMSNT SBCORITY
POR DEVBLOPHSNT ABVISN NO. BB-43
109
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-519
A ABSOLUTION OF TNS CITY COUNCIL OF TAS CITY
OF IUINCNO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRINC TRB
ANNH%ATION OF CBRTAIN TERRITORY TO LAND9CAP8
W
FOR
MAINTSNANCB y DIBTRICT V•N0S~. y 1 WAND y6•
DSVSLOPMBNT ABVISW 88-63
38. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 112
Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance Dleirict No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for DA 89-30, located
on the eoutheaat corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street
submittec~y Genaele Aeal Batate.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-540 113
A RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OF PANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPRO~PMENT AGPS3v_P.ENT AHD ?P3ROV&x?NT 9ECOP.ITY
POR DBVELOPlRNT RBVISN NO. 89-30
s>
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 12
RHSOLUTION NO. 89-521 114
A AHSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF PANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNHEATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTBNANC6 DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STRHHT LIGHTING
MAINTBNANCB DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND fi POR
DEVELOPMLNT RHVIEN 84-10
39. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 11]
Tract 13748, located on the southwest corner of Hilliken
Avenue antl Vintage Drive, submitted by H.J. Brock and
Sons, Inc.
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-522 12~
A AHSOLUTION OF 1'EI6 CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVSMBNT ACAHEMENT BETHNSION AND
IMPROVSl~NT SHCURITY POR TRACE 13748
40. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 6xtaneicn for 121
Tract 13857, located on Lhe northwest corner of Milliken
Avenue and Vintage Dcive, eutmitted by M.J. Brock and
Soria, Inc.
RHSOLUT ION NO. 89-523 124
A AHSOLUTION OP TIOI CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMYROVBMENT AGREHMBNT 8%THNSION AND
IMPROVEIVINT SHCURITY POR TRACT 13857
41. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Bxtenelon far 125
Tract 13858, located on the eouthweet corner of Hilliken
Avenue and Benyen Street, eubmitted Dy M.J. Brock end
Sone~ Inc.,
RHSOLUT ION NO. 89-526 128
A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMFROVSNSS7T AGRBS77SNT EETSI7GIOI7 A77C ~
IMPROVBMENT SHCURITY POR TRACT 13858
42. Approval to azecute Improvement Agreement Bxtenelon for 129
Tract 13442, located on the northwest corner of Victoria
Park Lene end Henyon Nny, auDm it tad by Beywaod Nomee.
I"(
~; n
n
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 ~ 13
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-525 132
A RESOLUTION OF THIL CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCNO COCAMONGA, CALIPORNIRr APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT ACRSSMBNT E%iBNSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13442
43. Approval to exewte Tmprovemsnt Agreement Extension for 133
Parcel Mnp 9350, located on the northeast corner of Baee
Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The William
Lyon Company.
RBSOLVTION NO. 89-526 135
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF TRS CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGI#. CALIFOANIAr APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGAEElBNT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMEN2 SECURITY POR PARCEL NAP 9350
44. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension Eor 136
Parcel Nap 9897, located on the eouthenet corner of
Church Street end Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Lewis
Homes.
138
RESOLUTION .tl0. 89-527
A RESOLUTION OP T!B CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY
~
IMPROVSNBNT
~ AOAEBMENT ~•• EXTSNSION••V•AND
IMPROVEMENT BECURITY POR PARCEL HAP 9897
45. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Bxteneion for 1 139
Parcel Map 11341, located on the northeast corner of
j Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis
Homee.
141
RBSOLVTION NO. 89-528
A RSSOLUT ION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMf0N0Ar CALIPORNIAr APPROVING
IMPROVBMENT AGREEMENT S%TENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA PARCEL MAP 11341
i i i i i
46. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
142
Tract 12902 located on the southwest corner of Hermosa
Avenue and Almond Street euboitted by Nordic Woods II.
rn }
r 4,
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 14
RHSOLOTZOR NO. 89-529 144
A ABSOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEIffiNT AGRSSl~NT EXTENSION AND
INPROVBHSNT SECURITY POA TMCT 12902
145
47. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 8xtenaion for
Tract 13367, located on the north aide of Highland Avenue
between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street, eubmltted by
Quinteeeence Developaent.
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-530 147
A RHSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF RANCfiO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVSlRNT AGRBBlBNT HXTHNSION ANU
IHPROVBI~NT SHCURZTY POR TRACT 13367
48. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds, and
Notice of Completion for:
148
act 6 5 a tad n
the o rheas[ co ner f H'lliken A e a nd Hiahl d
Ave u
Relenee:
D.tlh e,.t Dw.inrmxncw Bond (Streetl 5207,600.OD
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5207,600.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-531 149
A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THS
PUBLIC IMPR04BMENTS FOR TRACT 12fi42, 12935-44
MASTER STR@ST9 AND AUTHORISING THS PILING OP
A NOTICE OP CGMPLHTION POR THS WON1C
act 12936 located an the west side of Hil lview Loop at 150
Xettle Peak Place end Ht. Palomar Street
i
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $108,000.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,800.00
~ ~ i
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 19&9 15
RESOLUTION NO. 89-532
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPROVSMBNTS POA TRACT 12936 AND
AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOT ICS OF
COMPLETION FOR TAB WOAR
bract 12939 located on rho east aide of Rillview Loon at 151
52
TL a P ak ou t d Rett a Pe place
Release:
Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 55,000.00
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Streetl 5 8,500.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-533 153
A RESOLUTION OF TN8 CITY COLR7CIL OP THS CITY
OP RANCAO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
TNS PUBLIC IMPROVElBNTS POR TRACT 12939 AND
AUTHORIZING THB FILING OP A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION POR THS WORK
49. Approval to accept the Red H111 Park Storm Drain 154
Improvement Project, Contract No. 69-082, as complete,
.ore"e w....a" _.. .. ....C .. Li .gl~De. ~.. uw a
"Notice of Completion".
RESOLUTION NO. 89-534 155
A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
PUBLIC IMPAOVEMBNTS FOR RSD HILL PARR STORM
DRAIN AND AUTHORIZING THS PILING OF A NOTICE
OP COMPLETION FOR THS WORK
50. Approval of Propceed Intention to Excavate the Alte Lome 156
eaeln No. 1 located no[th of Banyan Street between
Archibald and Hermosa Avenues within Assessment Dietrlct
eb-2 and the ceiling for Aide fot en id basin excavatlon,
i , Aeueeement Diar.rict Nn, 54-2 (Alta Loma Stcrr„ Dra iDy -
Bid No. 3, to be funded £rom Assessment DLetrict Drainage
System Fund, Account No. BO-4&37-602&.
f ~ /~v~
i~ ti,
V~
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 16
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-535 158
A ABSOLUTION OF TNH CITY COUNCIL OF TER CITY
OP AANCEIO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO OADHR CBRTAIN CNANGBS AND
MODIFICATIONS IN TER NOAA IN A SPECIAL
ASSESSMBNT DISTRICT AND 96TTING PUBLIC FISARI NG
RESOLUTION NO. 89-536 150
A RESOLUTION OP TNS CITY COVNCIL OF TER CITY
OP RANCFIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AEPERHNCING
PREVAILING MAGE SCALE AND DIRECTING CALL FOR
CONSTRVCTION GIGS
6. CON8ISNT ORDINANCBB
~' Tha folloriag Orditaaces Mw had public hearings at the rive
of first reeding. eeeaed reediegs ere erpectad to be routine
'I sad non-ooatroTersiel. Thq rill M wted upon by the Council
~'~ at a~ !iw rithout di aeuuion. The City Clerk rill read the
title. Anp ita can be reso~aM for discussion.
~i 1. ST CTS
I D A
l request to pre-none approximately 25 acres located on the
nOtinaaet corner qL Mignlanq anq xgcne9ter AVCnUea t0 LOW
' Density Residential (2-4 dWel ling unite per acre) - APN
225-152-01, 02, 03, O4 and 18.
ORDINANCE NO. 400 )second reading) 152
AN OPD INANCB OP TER CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALL POPNIA, APPROVING
DSVELOPMSNT DISTRI CI AMHNDMENT 89-02, PRE-
20Nji1G APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES OP VACANT LAND
TO LOW DHNSITY ABSIDBNTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS
"~ PSA ACAB) LOCATED AT TFR NORTHEAST CORNER OP
NIGI{LAND AND ROCNSSTBR AVBNUBS AND HARING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THBREOP - APN 225-152^O1,
i
i 02, 03, 04, AND 18
i
2. ENVIRONlRNTAL ASSBSSMSNT AND DEVELOPMENT AORBBNBNT 89-03
= BLACEUION NOMHS. INCORPORATBD - A request to approve a
tlevelopoent agreement )CO 89-169) for approximately 25
acres consisting of 78 reeitlent ial lore located at the
northeast corner of HSghlanQ and Rochester Avenues - APN
225-152-03, O2, 03, 04 and 18.
~~~
PAGE
Ciiy Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 17
OADINANCB NO. 401 (second reading) 164
AN ORDINANCE OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OP AANCRO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVBLOP!ffiNT AGRBSIOINT 09-03 POR APPROXIMATELY
25 ACRBS OP VACANT LAND LOCATED AT TR&
NORTHEAST CORNER OP HIGFII.ANO AND ROCED;ST&R
AVHNOES, AAD MA.4ING FIND INGS xN StlPPORT
THEREOF - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04, AND 18
3. CONSIDB ION TO AMEND CHAPTER 2 28 OP TE76 RANCHO
CVCAMORGA MUNICIPAL CODE DISSOLVING THE ADVISORY
COMMISSION AND CREATING IN ITS GLACE A CITIZENS
ENVI ROMMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
ORDINANCE NO. 307-A (second reading) 218
AN ORDINANCE OP TFHS CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY
OF RAHCAO COCAMONOA. CALI POANIA, AMBHOING
CHAPTER 2.2E OP THB RANCMO CUCAMOIPGA MUNICIPAL
COOS DIBSOLVIMG TNS ADVISORY COMMISSION AND
CREATING IN STS PLACE A CITI ZBNS BNVIRONlD3NTAL
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
- P. ADVERTIddD PVdLIC eSAAI1108
.L. i.,ii.,wiuy iLsa i.ere Leeu surer uew euu/vr pusses as
public huriaga as required DF law. The chair hill open the
esetiag to receive public teetlanaY.
1. CONSIDERATION TO ORDBA THB DBTACHMSNT OP TRACT 13063 220
LOCATED 8 ST OP BAST AVENUE SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE
FROM LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCB DISTRICT 1 AND THS FORMATION
OP LANDSCAPH MAINTSNANCB DISTRICT NO. 8
221
RHSOLUTION NO. 09-537
A ABSOLUTION OP THt CITY COUNCIL OP TFIS CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TNB
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THS OETACFAI6NT OF
TRACT 130fi3 PROM LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE
~ ~ ~ CISTftICT :70. 1, T17H FORMAT ICN OF LANOSCAPfi ~
NAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 8 AHD ACCEPTING TNB
PI NAL ENGINBBR'S REPORT
~~~~~^ sss ~~/ , , yyy yyyl
r ~~ ~
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 10
2. HNVIRONlDINTAL ASS886MENT AND GSNHRAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89- 228
,0~1t- S.G.E. DBVHLOPMHNT - A request to amend the General
Plan Land Ute Map from Flood Control to Medium Density
Residential (e-14 dwelling unite par acre) for
approximately 1.78 acres of land located on the west aide
of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood
Control CheMel, and south of Viveru Street - APN 207-
022-64.
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-538 268
A ABSOLUTION OF TRS CITY COONCIL OP TNB CITY
OF RANCFIO CUCAF.ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
GENERAL PLAN ANHNDEHNT 89-02A, AMENDING THB
GBNBRAL PLAN LAND USB MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL
TO MEDIUM DENSITY RBSIDBNTIAL (0-14 DNBLLING
UNITS PER ACAS) !OR APPAOXIMATBLY 1.78 ACRES
OP LAND LOGTED ON TNB NEST SIDE OP CARNHLIAN,
BAST OY THE COCANONf'A CRBEX PI.OOD CONTROL
CHANNEL, AND BOOTH OP VIVBRO 9TRSET, AND
MAEING FINDINGS ZN SUPPORT TFDSRBOP - APN 207-
022-64
BNVIAONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEVBLOPMENT DISTRICT 228
AMENDMENT 87-12 - H.O.N. DBVEZ.OPMEITF - A request to amend
the Development Districts Nap from Flood Control to
Mediwa Density Residential (5-14 dwelling unite per acre)
.ry~....i~ne.e:y .- eu an ui ~ iwalw3 uu ~iltl wntll
`
u
aide of Carnelian
Avenue, east of
the Cucamonga Creek
Flood Control Channel, and south of Vivero Street - APN
207-022-64.
ORDINANCH NO. 404 (first reading) 2~0
AN ORDINANCE OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TNH CITY
OP RANCRO CUCAMONOA, CALZPORNIA, APPROVING
DBVEI.~RNT DIBTRICT AMENDMENT NO. 87-12,
AMBNDING TEB DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM
FLOOD CONTROL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(0-14 DNEI.LINO UNITS PSR ACRE) POR
APPROX IMATHLY 1.78 ACASS OP LAND LOCATED ON
THB NEST SIDH OP CARNELIANr BAST OP THH
' ' C!'^..AMONOA CP3EP. FLOOD COHTRCSL C7Ui7777EL, A7:D '
SOUTH OP VIVERO STREET, AND MARINO FINDINGS ZN
9UPPORT THEREOF - APN 207-022-64
CJ~£
0
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 19
3. ENVIAONMBNTAL ASSBfiSNENT AND GBNHPAL PLAN AMBNDMSNT NO ZIZ
89-02C - POTURB SSTATB. INC. - A request to amend the
General Plan Lnnd U9e Map from Office to Medium Density
Residential (e-14 dwelling unite per acre) for 3.556
acres of land located at the southeast corner of
Archibald Avernus and Church Street. The City will ales
consider Nei9Ahorhood Commercial and Low Medium Density
Residentinl ere alternat ivs deelgnat ions - APN 1077-332-
26. (ITEM TO 86 CONTINUED TO NOVEMBAt 15, 1989 MEBTINO)
AHSOLUTION NO. 89-539 272
A RBSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OY TFIE CITY
OP RANCHO CDCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA. APPROVING
GENBIU\L PLAN AlD3NDMHNT 89-02C, AMENDING THB
GENBRAL PLAN LAND U58 HAP PROM OPPICB TO
MSDIOM DENSITY RBEIDENTIAL (B-14 DWELLING
UNITE PEA ACRE) FOR 3.556 ACRE6 OP LAND
LOCATBD AT THS SOVTAEAST CORNEA OP ARCMIBALD
AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET, AND MAEINO PIND INGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-332-26
SNVIRONNBNTAL ASSBSSMSNT AND DHVBLOPMBNT OISTRICT ZJ2
AMBNDHENT NO. 89-04 - PVTUAB BSTATB. INC. - A request tc
amend the Development Districts Map from ^OP••
(office/Profeaeionel) to "H" (Mndlum Density, 8-14
dwelling unite per acre) for 3.556 acres of land located
~., e ~ u.e -.. .......... .r-.. ..__ _..A Lbe nF
a
-
The City w111 also consider "NC"
(Neighborhood
Street.
commercinl) end "LM" (Low Medium) ere alternative
districts - APN 1077-332-26.
ORDINANCE NO. 605 (first reading) 272
AN OPDINANCB OP THS CITY COVNC IL OP THE CITY
OP AANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA. APPROVING
DBVBLQPjtENT DISTRICT AM&NDMENT NO. 89-04,
AHBNDIHO TNB DEVBLOY!ffiNT DISTRICTS MAP PROM
"OP" (OFPICB/PROFESSIONAL) TO "M' (MEDIUM
OfiNBITY, 8-14 DWELLING UNITS YBR ACPE) POR
3.556 ACRES OP LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OP ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CNVRCM STRBBT,
~ AND :!'_ IN3 PINDING° IN SVPe GRT THEPE OP - AVN
1077-332-26
~~V}
4~ ,
PAGE
City Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 20
a. R s T 89- 273
02D - RANCHO CUCAMOHGA RHDHVBLOPMBNT AGHNCY - A request
to amend the Lend V9e Element of the Genarel Plan from
Flood Control fo Civic/COamunity for 3.15 acres of land,
located on the north aide of Banyan Street, east of the
Deer Creek Channel - APN 201-191-24.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-54C ~ 296
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CENHRAL PLAN AMENOMBNT 89-02D AlIBND ING THE
GHNERAL PLAN LANG USB MAP PROM FLOOD CONTROL
TO CZVIC/COM1[IJNITY POR APPROX INATELY 3.15
ACRES OF LAND LOCAT%D ON THE NORTH SIDH OP
BANYAN STREET, BAST OP THE D%ER CRSSA CHANNEL,
AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN
201-191-24
~NVIAON!@NTAL ASSHSSHBNT AND DH48LOPMANT DISTRICT 273
AMENDMENT 89-OS - RANCHO CUCAMONOA REDBVHLOPHENT AGHNCY -
A request to amend Lha Development Oiatricta Map from
Flood Control to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling unLte per
acre) for 3.15 acres of land, located on the north aide
I of Hanyan Street, east of the DeeC Ctaek Channel - APN
{ 201-191-24.
I
Jiw lnnn~a nu. •uo ~urar reamngl 298
AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A!ffiNDHSNT N0. 89-OS
AMENDING TH% 0A'V%LOPHSNT DISTRICTS MAP FROM
FLOOD CONTROL TO LOW DENSITY R83IDSNTIAL (2-
4 OWBLL ING UNITS PER ACR%) POA APPROXIMATHLY
3.15 ACASS OF LARD LOCATHD ON TEH: NORTH SIDE
OF 8~lD AN STREET, EAST OP D%SA CRESR CHANNEL,
AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN
201-191-24
5. CONS IOSRAT O T ON USE P I 8 12 300
MODIFICATION - WHSTSRN PAOPERTI%S - A request to appeal
~ the ccnditions Of approval Liiiinsad Ly the Planning ~
Commieelon requirLng a pedestrian passageway through
Building X, within the Terre Vieea Towne Center, located
et the northeast Corner OE Haven Avenue end Foothill
Boulevard - APN 1077-421-05, 06, and 13.
r ~~i~
7:Jy~
PAGE
City Council Agenda
Novembez 1, 1989 21
RHSOLUTION NO. 89-541 323
A RESOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OF MNCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE
APPEA[. OF THB CONDITION RBQUIRING A PEDBSTRIAN
WALRMAY THROVCH BUILDING R AS I!fl?OSAD BY THB
PLANNING COl41I SSION FOA THB APPROVAL OF
MODIFICATION TO CONDZTZONAL USB PEAMIT 88-12
WITRIN THB TERM VISTA 1VWNB CENTER, LOCATED
AT THE NOATNBAST ODRNER OP MVEN AVENUE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND HARING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-421-05, 06, AND 13
O. PUBLIC BEARINGS
The following ltge have np legal publication ar pouting
raquiragpis. The Cbeir will opaa the ~eatiag to wceive
public testiMOay.
1. ~`VSIDSMTION OP BMINS DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQOIRE PUBLI 325
G ON
TFOS COCAMONOA CR6 CHANNEL TO 1300 PBET EAST TABRBOP -
Public hearing regarding Eminent Domain action to acqulrn
public right-of-way for tae Cucamonga etozm Drain, Phaae
Ir located at 7785 Vineyard Avenue (APN 208-091-23) for
tae construction of storm drain improvements across said
~ ~.wyea~y.
RESOLUTION NO. H9-542 330
A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO COCAHONGA. CALIFOANIA, OBCLARING THB
PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION
OP CERTAIN MAL PROPERTY LOCATED 2N THB CITY
OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 208-
091 ~, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPOATe
Tae following itga do sot legally require anp pu611c i
~ ~ testimony, althcugh tAe CAair eey open the Ngiing for public
input.
1. CONSIDEMTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THA pROPOS@D REGIONAL AIR 334
QUALITY ELEMENT
u~:S.
L)Y.~
PAGE
City Council Agende
NOVan6er 1, 1989 22
335
RESOLUTION NO. 89-543
A RBSOLUTION OB THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY
OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARTICIPATION WITH SAN 88RNAADINO COUNTY POR
TAH PRBPARATION OP A ABOIONAL AIR QUALITY
BLEMSNT FOA THE PURPOSH OF IMPROVING AIR
QUALITY WITHIN SAN HEANARD •_NO COUNTY
2. V T 8TH 337
STAE R N Ae I N TOPERA ANO
SANTA FE RAILROAD
33H
3. AEVIEH OP PROPOSHD LANDSCAPH MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
GE RAL U D V P
T. CDDIfCIL W8IN688
The following Sipe here beq requ•ated Dy th• City Comcil
for diacuaaion. They era noL public hearing Sips, although
the Chair xp op•n th• x•ting for public input.
1. V O S S C RDINANC
SOLICITATION SHCTION (Ornl Report) (Continued fros
October 18, 1989)
_ _..____ _..._.._. _°...._ ------_---.._ _...._._.. _._ .._.. _.._..
` van
AVHNV83
3. UPDATE REPORT ON NORDIC WOODS (Oral Report)
4. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION REDUCING NO%IOVS FUMES AND 345
SHO](E HMITTED BY VEHICLES
RBSOLUTION NO. 89-546 346
A RBSOLVTION OB TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY
08 PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REDUCING
NOXIOUS FUM88 AND SMOXH 6MITTSD BY VHHI CL@S
~ ~ J D S R O ~
This 1a the tine for City Couacll to idgtify the itga th•y
wish to d/atuu wt Lhe next xeiing. Thx• ltgs will not ba
diaeuued e! Lhla xeting, only identified for the nex!
xetieg.
1
PAGE
Clty Council Agenda
November 1, 1989 23
E. COINIONICATIONB PROM TBE POBLIC
This L the tir uQ platy for the Buual public Lo address
the City Comcil. elate Lr prohibits the City Council froze
eddrsuiag uy iuu sot previoasly included on the Agenda.
The City Comeil uy meive bsLlaoay sad sat the utter for
a subsegueat eaetieq. Cosswnts us Lo Ds lieited to five
minutes per iaditidvnl.
L. AOJO3IRIIID3Aff
N86TIM0 TO ADJOOIIN TO JOINT IRBTI110 NITS T~ PURE ANO
RRCREATION COMitIBBION. NOVA16At 1{, 1989, 700 P.N. AT TBE
LION9 PART( COMNOIIIT! CpPTBR.
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on October 27, 1989, seventy-tw (72) hours
prior to the meeting per Government Cotle 54953 at 9320-C Baee
I
I
I Line Roed.
I
September 26, 1989
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTRS
Adi rrted Joi t H ti a
An adjourned joint meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and the Planning Commission to discuss the Victoria Gardena Regional Mall with
the Hahn Company was called for Tuesday, September 2fi, 1989 at 6:30 p. m., to be
held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 ease LSne Road, Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
Due to a lack of quorum the meeting was cancelled, and duly posted ae such on
September 22, 1989.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
Approved:
September 2B, 1989
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Special Keetlne
A special meeting of the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga was held
on Thursday, September 26, 1989, at Windrows Park, 6849 Victoria Park Lane,
Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:15 p. m. by
Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
P: esent were CouncilmemDere: William J. Alexander; Deborah N. Brown; and Mayor
Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Ksnager; Jaalee Markman, City Attorney; Rick
Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Plflnner; and Debra J.
Adams, City Clerk.
Absent were Councilmembera: Charles J. Buquet II end Pamela J. Wright
• R • k • ~
Mavn. e«....« " ~__ „_ c ~„-„ ~„ eye~iai meesrng ror an Executive Session to
discuss poaeible ^l itigation in order to atop Norm Johnson and the Rock Crusher
plant, who continue to violate the "Stop Work Order" issued by the County. Re
further etat¢d another reason he called this meeting is that it hoe been brought
to his attention that they are violating their ^Stop Work Order" and Continuing
to put in improvements and do construction work on eit¢. He further stated it
hoe been learned this week that the County hoe declined to take an injunctive
action agai.net the Rock Crusher plant, leaving the City ne choice but to explore
other poseibllit ies ae to what the Ciiy can do.
Mayor Stout stated he hoe oohed James Markman, City Attorney, to look into this
matter.
. • t • • .
tteetlny adiourneri ar c;2n p,m, _e ar. Dxecutive Seaeion to oieeues potential
litigation against she Fourth Street Aock Crusher Company, in relation to the
work now performed at their project site near the Day Creek Plood Control
Facility, conerery to the orders of the County of San Bernard Lno.
• • • ~ .
City Council Minutes
September 2R, 1989
Pag¢ 2
The meeting reconvened at 5:28 p.m. wish three members of Council present
(BUquet, Wright absent).
MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Stout to move forward with litigation
against the Fourth Street Rock Crusher Company. Notion carried unanimously, 3-
0-2 (BUquet, Wright absent).
Councilma:. Alexander stated the reason he was voting foz this was because he felt
that by filing the lawsuit, it would definitely make a statement.
Mayor Stout stated for the record that he had talked with Councilwoman Wright
the previous evening and she was in favor of moving forward with the litigation.
fe f f R f R
MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously, 3-0-2 (BUquet, Wright abeam). MeatLng adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
Approved:
October d, 1989
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Recular Meeting
A. CALL. TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga met on
Wednesday, October 4, 1989, at the Lions Park Commun Lty Center, 9161 Base Line
Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ifotnia. The meeting wee Called to order at 7:30
p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander; Deborah N. Brown; Charles
J. Baguet II; 2amela J. Wright; and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda
D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick
Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Otto Kzoutil,
De putt' city Plaanor; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Auas Maguire, City
Engineer; Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer; John Martin, Associate Civil
Engineer; Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engi near; Bob 2etterberg, Maintenance
Suoerint ertdent; Jim Hart. Admin ietrat Lve Services Di rant nr: ~Tna srhnlty.
Community Services Manager; Marti Niggins, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator;
Tony Flozea, Adminietrat ive Aide; Duane A. Baker, Senior Admin ietrat ive
Assistant; Diane O'Neal, Admin Let rat ive Analyst; Susan Mickey, Administrative
Aide; Patty Riffel, Executive Assistant; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Pz of action District; Lieutenant Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's
Station; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
. . • ~ w w
~. AIBiOVNC~NTB/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of a Proclamation commemorating the 50th year of the Grape
Narvest Fe etival.
St cut st seed .he P: oclamat io: for the Grape Hazveat Feat lv ai wJU id be
presented to the Chamber of Convnerce at the opening ceremonies.
82. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there has been some misinformation
about the City's poe it ion relative to filing a lawsuit against the Fourth Street
Aock Crusher Company. James Markman, City Attorney, confirmed a lawsuit has
been Ei led, and that hie firm will represent the Ctty in court in the next few
weeks, and Ghat Chet' ere pureu ing this.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 2
B3. Jack Lam, City Managerr stated that Items D7 and D20 have been pulled from
this agenda, and Item D22 haq a correction in the title.
E4. Councilwoman Brown stated last week she was elected Vice President of the
Inland Empire Division League of California Cities, and asked for the City
Council's concurrence.
Mayor Stout stated he did not have a problem with this and felt it was a very
prestigious position.
M t • fi 1r R
C. COMMUNI GTIOSS PROM TR6 PUBLIC
Councilwoman Brown stated she nee been asked to read a letter from the
homeowners of the Caryn Project, and stated that although this cannot be
discussed tonight, she asked for it to be placed on the October 1B, 1989 agenda
for tliscuaeion. The letter was read into the record:
"October 1, 1989
Deborah Brown, Councilwoman
Rancho Cucamonga City Council
Ccuncilmr.,.an emwn; (sic)
On behalf of the Caryn Homeowners Organization I am requesting your
assistance in bringing our proposal [o the agenda of the Rancho Cucamonga
City Council. Would you pisses see that each member of the council
receives a copy of our letter.
Over the past several years the res idente of the Caryn Planned Community
have watched ocher developments grow into family planned cpmmunities.
These areas have at least ane park and playground facll i[y within their
boundaries. The Caryn development loaf the lend set aaide as a
neighborhood park and single family homes now sit on that Bite. The
paseoa have already been laid out, however they lead nowhere. They were
part of the original plan which Included the park. We would like to
request your aeaietance in helping ue to obtain a pack within our
development.
Our proposal is set forth in the following:
1. We are requesting the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga purchase and
set ab Lieh land to be used ae a COMMUNITY PARR Eor recreation within the
CARYN OEVSLOPMENT.
2. LOCATION: Tha 8 acres 6aet along Milliken Avenue-North of Highland,
South along Vintage within the boundriea of the Caryn Development.
City Council Minutes
October 6, 1989
Page 3
3. To facilitate tae loes of park land ae set forth in the Master Plan
by the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga which ie set up to allow 5 acres of park
for every 1,000 people. The money received, around 5700,000.00 from the
original Bite was placed in the parka 6 recreation general fund and should
be available under the John P. Quiby (sic) Act passed by the State
Legislature.
4. NAME: The CARYN HOMHOWNERS OAGANIZATION, officers and Board of
Directors wcuid like to eubmitt (sic) for coneltleration tae name of
Vintage Park to the Parke S Recreation Commieeion and have our name
proposal placed before the City Council. The name could be changed at
some later time by a vote at large of the Caryn Homeowners Organization
and in compliance of any regulations set forth by the Parks 6 Recreation
Commission or 6y City Council.
5. The CARYN HOMEOWNERS ORGANIZATION will donate trees to be planted
within the park. The CARYN HOMEOWNERS Parke 6 Aec. board memebere (sic)
would request to work with the Parke S Recreation Commission and tae ciiy
in establishing the layout of the park.
6. The boundaries 6aet along Hilliken Ave. and on the Southern accees
road be Fenced or a wall built to provide safety for our children from the
proposed freeway and security for homeowners boardering (sic) the proposed
perk.
Present condiiione force our children to walk along Miliken (sic) Avenue
and cross Highlentl Avenue to uss the perks 1n the Victoria community.
This is not a suitable condition with regards to the safety of ouc
children. Overcrawding in tae Victoria Parke are making some parents
drive their children out of the community to find playground facllitiea
elsewhere.
The rea ideate of the Caryn Planned Community have no area at the present
time within our development Ear which to hold meetings, eoc ial gatherings
or club act iv it iee.
Councilmembere, GuR commitment to this and the severity of our proposal
ie evident wits C}fQ elgned petitions before each of you. Ttie ee 1008
eignaturee were gathered wlthln two days to make our presentation here
tonight along with the residents from the Caryn Community.
The Caryn Community no Longer wenta to be known ae the "quiet community".
We have aBtabliahBd AO active, wupport ive CARYN HOMEOWNERS OAGANI2AT ION
to work within our development end to support the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Thank you for your consideration and time In hearing our proposal.
city Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 4
Sincerely,
CARYN HOMEOWN&AS 0AGANI2ATION
Charles L. Haynes, President"
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this can come back on the October 18, 1989 agenda
regarding review of the park.
Mayor Stout suggested this be placed on the October 18, 1989 agenda.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Di. Approval of Minutes: September 6, 1989
September 12, 1989 (BUquet absent)
September 20, 1989
D2. Approval of Warrant e, Register Noe. 9/20(89 and 9/27/89, and Payroll
ending 9/16/89 for the total amount of $1,473,583.87.
03. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule ae of September
27, 1989.
n4. Approval to authorize the advert isinq of the ^NOtice Snvit inq eida^ for
the ease Line Road St zest Improvements, Storm Drain and Traff lc Signals, Erom
west of Victoria nark Lane to west of InLetetete 15, to be funded from System
Development A.c count Noe. 22-4637-8940, 22-d 637-8941, 22-4637-8731, 22-4637-8730
and Etiwanda Drainage Account No. 19-bfi37-8840 (FY 89/90?.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-447
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CAL IFORNZ A, AFPROVING PLANS AND SPBCSFICAT ZONE FOR
THE "BASE LINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEHENTS, STORM DRAIN AND
TRAPFIC SIGNALS, PROH NEST OF VICTORIA PARR LANE TO WEST OF
INTERSTATE 15", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERR 1R'fTDVERT ISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D5. Approval to authorize the advertleing of the "Notice Inviting Bitle" for
the Arrow Route Street Improvements Phase II, located on the south aide of Arrow
Route, from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, the Traffic Signal at Arrow
Route and Nermnwa Avenu9 and the Traffic Signal upgrade at Arrow Route and
Archibald Avenue, to be funded from Syeteme Development Account No. 22-4837-5735
and T.D.A. Article a Account Noa. 12-4637-8829 and 12-4637-8830 (PY 89/90).
RESOLUTION NO. 89-448
A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF TNH CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS POR
THE "ARROW ROUTE BTREBT IMPROVElQiNTS PHASE II, LOCATED ON THE
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 5
SOUTH SIDE OF ARAON ROUTE PROM ARCHIHALD AVENUE TO HEAMOSA
AVENUE, THE TRAFFIC EIGNAL AT ARROW ROUTE AND HERMOSA AVENUE
AND THE TRAFPIC SIGNAL VPGRADE AT ARROW ROUTE AND AACHZBALD
AVENUE", ZN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO ABCEIVE BIDS
D6. Approval to award the Hidden Parm Road Culvert Improvement Project located
east of Carnelian on Hidden Farm Road for the amount of $71,888.00, to be funded
.:ith Drainage General City Account No. 23-4637-8765 (PY 88/89 and 89/90(.
. -_~____ __.._..___, ~.. o..,-~i-~-rrnaae
ef-3 .
deevmente. ITEN RBNOVED PROM AOBNDA.
D8. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the
proposed Jersey sou levard Storm drain from Vincent Avenue to 3100 feet Eaet,
being part of Aeeeeement District 82-1.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-449
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENV IAONMF.NTAL INITIAL
STVDY AND ISSVANCE OP A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION POR THE PROPOSED
JERSEY BOVLEVAAD STORM DMIN PROM VINCENT AVENUE TO 1100 FEET
EAST, BEING PART OF ASSE93MBNT DISTRICT E2-1
D9. Approval to accept oaeh deposit ae surety for completion of undezgrou nding
of utilities for the purpose of releasing utility conneotione, Tract 11734,
Lewis Homes.
^30. Approval to name the park facility in the Victoria Vineyards South
Development the John P. Quimby Park. ITmI PVLLRD POR DISCUSS ION BY COUNCILWOMAN
WRIOHT, STOUT AND BROWN CONCURRED.
D11. Approval of a SuOCidination Agreement (CO 89-158( for 8797 Strang Lane
submitted by Henry Allen and Debra June Taylor Allen.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-450
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY CO!*NC IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHi~
CUO'AHUNGA, CALTFORN IA, APPROVING A 9UBOADINATION AGREEMENT
FROM HENRY ALLEN AND DEBRA JUNE TAYLOR ALLEN AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CL&RA TO SICN SAME
D12. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement (CO 89-159( for Underground ing of
Overhead Util it tea for Development Review 85-48, located at the northeast corner
of Hellman Avenue end Seventh Street, submitted by Golden West Equity
Propert tea, Incorporated - UR 003.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 89-451
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
H%ECUTED ON OCTOBBR d, 1989 POR UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD
UTILITIBS ON HBLLMAN AVHNUH AT THB INTERSECTION OF SEVENTH
STREET
013. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-160) for the Sapphire Parkway
Renovation and Trail Retrofit Improvement Project located north of Banyan Street
awarded to Gateway Landscape Con et ruction Company for the amount of 694,578.00
($85,980.00 plus l0i coot ingercy) to be funded from Beautification Funds Account
No. 21-4647-8845 (PY 88/B9 and 89/90) (Awarded September 6, 1989).
014. Approval to execute contracts with Derbieh, Guerra 6 Associates (CO 89-
161), DGA Consultant e, Incorporated (CO 89-162) and Associated Civil Engineers
(CO 89-163) for 8ngi nearing Plan Checking Services; and with J.F. Davidson 6
Associates (CO 89-164) and R.TM Design Group (CO 89-365) for Landscaping Plan
Checking Services for FY 1989/90.
015. Approval of Hapr execution of Improvement Agreements, Improvement
Securities and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
and Street Lighting Ma intensnce District Noe. 3 and 2 for Tract 13566-1 and -
3, located on the south aide of 24th Street, west of Cherry Avenue in the Low
Density Residential Area, submit red by The Caryn pevelopment Company, Btanda[d
Pacific of Orange Cou nay, Rockfie ld Development Corpotation and Century American
Corporation.
RHSOLUTION NO. 89-452
A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCKO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT NOS• 13566-1 AND -3
RESOLUTION NO. 89-653
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, ~CALIFORNI A, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE HA INTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOB. 1 AND 2 POR TRACT 13566-1
AND 13566-3
015, Approval o- Hap, execution Of Improvement Acraement, imnrnvoment Secur~b
and Ordering the`Annexatlon to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Streot
Lighting Maintenance Dletrlct Noe. 1 and 2 foY Tract 13727, located at the
southwest corner of Cnrnellnn Street and Highland Avenue, submitted by Southland
Development Corporation. ITEM PULLED POR DISCUHBIOR BY COVNCILNONAN NRIOeT.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 89-454
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPAOWHENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMHNT SECURITY, AND PINAL NAP OF TRACT NO. 13727
RESOLUTION NO. 88-455
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIPOANIA, OADBRiNG THE ANNAXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D23TAICT NO. 1 AND STAEEI
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANb 2 FOR TRACT 13727
D 17. Approval of Map, execution of Impcovement Agreement, Improvement Security
and Order inq the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 3 and 2 for Tract 12820, located at the
southeaeL corner of Highland Avenue and .Teeper Street, submitted by Southland
Development Corpnrat ion.
RESOLUTION NO. 09-456
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALTPORNIAr APPROVING INPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IHPROVeMENT SECURITY POA TAACf NO. 12820
RESOLUTION NO. B9-4S7
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
~c~u;60;;C.^., ^AT.S FOANIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTL'Nwn~.a C~_TF,I^T tAt. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N06. 1 ANb 2 POR TRACT NO. 1282V
D18. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security
antl Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance Dietr ict Noe. 1 and
3 for Parcel Nap 11838, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and
Victoria Yark Lane, submitted by The Will ism Lyon company.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-458
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALZFORNZA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NVMHBA 11838,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 11838), IHPAOVEMENT AORBBMENT AND
INPROVEHENT SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 89-459
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXRT ION OP CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
3 POR PARCEL MRP 11838
City Council Minutee
October 4, 1989
Page 8
D 19. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security
and Ordering the Annexation to Land seeps Maintenance District No. 4 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Tract 13304, located on the
northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, submitted by
Lewis Homes of California.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-460
A RESOLUTION OP TRB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPOPNTA, APPROVING IMPAOVEMBNT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT NO. 13304
RESOLUTION NO. 89-461
A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORN IA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STRBET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 POR TRACT NO. 13304
ITEM RA1oVED PRON AOENDII
~~
D21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security antl
Ordering Lhe Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Diettict No. 3 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for OR BB-21, located at 8989 9th
Street, east of Vineyard Avenue, submitted by Peeeon, a divie ion of Avery.
R830LUTION NO. 89-464
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCNO
CVCAMONOA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVBMBNT AeREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DBVSLOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88-21
City Council Minutee
October 4, 1989
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 89-465
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OADBAING THS ANNBXATION OP CERTAIN
TBARITOAY TO LAHJSCAPS MAINTENANCE DTSTAICT NO. 3 AND BTREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 88-21
D22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, improvement Security end
Ordering the Annexet ion io Lnndecapa Mnintanance District No 3, ', SGYB®ti
LightllYq'. lis~CEA~Iu'$~s[Fii~iCe. 1 and 6 for DR 88-14, located on the
northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 8th Street, submit tad by Indumar
Investment e, Incorporated. TITLB CORRECTION S80NN.
ABSOLVTION NO. 89-466
A ABSOLUTION OP TX8 CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMRNT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DEVELOPMBNT ABVIEW NO. 88-14
RBSOLUTION NO. 89-4fi7
A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TfiRRITORY TO LZ YDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICT NO. 3 AND STRfiET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NON. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW NO. 88-14
D23. Approval to accept Improvessnts, Release of Bonds end Notice of Completion
for:
Parcel Mao 11222 IDA 87-531, located on the south aide of 6th Street
between Buffalo Avenue and Rochester Avenue
Faithful Performance Bond (Street( $198,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-468
A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIAr ACCEPT INO THE PUBLIC IMPR0VEMBNT9 POR
PARCEL MAP 11222 (OR 07-63( AND AUTHORIZING THB FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR TH6 WORA
DR e~-26, locat d th south set corner of Arro HS h a and R the ter
v nue
Faithful Performance Bond (Street( $83G, 000.00
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 30
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-469
A RESOLVTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OF TF@ CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ACCB PTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR
DR 87-26 AND AUTNOAIE ING THS FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE HOAR
Tract 13559~ated on Sierra C~eet Vow Loog at,_Mq, -Wilson Court and
White Mountain Court
Release; Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $196,000.00
Accept: Mei ntenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 19,600.00
RESOLVTION NO. 89-470
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIAr ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA
TEACT 13559 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION POR THE WORK
Tzact 3742 e t d o t o soot et e o w Hi hwa and Sierra
Madre Avenue
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5 76, OJO.CO
Accept: Maintenance Gu arentea Bond (Street) 5 7,600.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-471
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGAr CALIPORNIAr ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TACT 13742 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OP A NOTICE OP
COMPLETION POR THE WORK
D24. Approval to accept the Avenida Vejar improvements, between Grove Avenue
and Sierra Madre ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to
file a "Notice of CompYeFion".
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-472
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CGCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROI CMENTS FOR
AVEN IDA VEJAR, BBTWBBN GROVE AVENUE AND 3IEAPA MADR&, AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICB OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORR
D25. Approval to release cash deposli Ln the amount of:
,~2y600.00 to Lewis Homes of Model Home Sales Office f r Tract 12317
52.500.00 to Lewis Homes Eor Model Home Sales Otf Lce Eor Tract 33013
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 11
$500.00 to L Hom f S bdi n 51 f T a t 115d9
50 D.00 to General Outd Ad a t' i t S'^ P zm t t Tract 12090
D 26. Approval to release cash deposit in the amount of $65,00 D.00 to Wat eon
Lantl Company for the required floodwall and perimeter lands taping for DA 87-26.
MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to approve t!:e .,o :sent
calendar, minus items D7, D10, ^16, antl D20, and with corrected title on item
D22. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
R R R R
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D10. Approval to name the park facility in the Victoria
Vineyards South Development the John P. Quimby Park.
Councilwoman Wright stated she had this item removed because she did not agree
with the recommendation.
Councilman Buquet eteted that with all due reepaci, he did not feel it ahoula
be named the Quimby Park, and did not Eeel a park should be named after any
living individual.
Councilwoman Brown concurred with Councilman euquet•e statement,
Mayor Stout suggested possibly naming the park Chaffey Park, John Raines oz Dona
Merced Park. He stated he did not agree with Quimby Park at this point in time.
Councilman Alexander asked why this had been decided to be called the Quimby
Park.
Councilwoman Brown stated it was through the Parke and Recreation Commission.
Councilman Buquet felt some sort of policy should be eatabliehed so that parka
are not named after any living individual.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that staff could provlde Council with a lint
of names to consider ai-L}1e October 18, 19 E9 meeting.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Nrlght to continue this item to
October 1B, 1989. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
R s a
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D16. Approval of Map, exacut ion of Improvement Agreement,
Improvement Secu r+ty and Ordering the Annexat lon to Landscape
District Nc. 1 and Street Maintenance
Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract
13727, located at the southwest corner of Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue,
submitted by Southlentl Development Corporation.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 12
RESOLUTION NO. 89-454
A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING iNPROVEtffiNT AGREEMENT,
IHPROVBMENT SBCORITY, AND FINAL NAP OP TRACT NO. 13727
RSEOLUTION NO. 89-455
A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB ANNE%AT ION OF CSRTAZN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTSNANCS DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTAICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13727
Councilwoman Wright wanted to make sure this was not in the Freeway right-of-
way, and that it could go underground if needed.
Rues Maguire, City 6ngiueer, stated this item, along with Stem D17, would both
be looked at in the planning stages.
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded Dy Stout to approve Reeo iut ion Noe. 89-
454 and 89-655. Motion carried unanlmouely, 5-0.
R R R R 1 tt
L. CONSENT 0RDINANC69
E1. CONSI T O C O C O. 0 A ING TO SALARIES FOR
Debra J. Ademe, City Clerk, Yeed Ghe title of OrdlnenCe No. 10-e.
Mayor Stout removed this item for diacueeicn.
Councilman Buquet stated he understood there was someone in the audience who had
requested to speak about the ordinance.
There was no response from the audience.
Councilman Buquet stated he wanted to read a letter and have it made a part of
the record:
"September 19, 1989
Mr. Dennis Stout, Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. BOX 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Mayor Stout
City Counci] Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 13
The Daily Report newspaper hoe recently run an article outlining the
forthcoming proposal to increase the fees paid to the members of the
Rancho Cucamonga Clty Council. I am writing to you to let you know ae a
business person end ae a citizen chat I strongly support the increase.
After I read the article I was somewhat dismayed over the fact of the
small "stipend" amount paid to the Council na3mbers. I had no idea that
you and the other Council members received such a small amount which is
nothing more than a mere token. I aA aware of the Lime Lhat the Council
members spend working in the coovounity and, yea, it ie true that elected
officials should be expected to serve, however, nny intelligent busineea
person or citizen ehou Ld know that even if a council person was to receive
the maximum amount per month based upon the State of California's formula
which, in this coca I believe would be $650.00, that you will never get
rich as an elected official. The Daily Report quotes another Council
member who apparently voted against an increase the last time the idea
surfaced stating that "in fact, it was expected of a city official^. I
believe this ie n very abort Bighted attitude and with the demands placed
again at the Council members, that type of an attitude ie unjust.
There are many private businesses located within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, moat have outside Honrd of Directors, and I can assure you that
the Board of Directors of fosse bueineeeee do not put in the time ae a
board member that the Council members do within the City. With Chat in
mind, ertain, let me say I would strongly support an increase in the
Council members' fees up to the maximum allowed by etatu[e.
aver .... owuo for ~nnH nnnA anrnoaa v: •aln thin Niv
Very truly youce,
Steven A. Seneenbach
President
SAS/ec
cc: J. Lam, City Manager"
Councilman Baguet crated he did vote agalnet the ircreaea in salary last Apr±1,
but ie in favor of it at the pxeeent time becauea of Lhe way it Se being
handled.
'Duna iiwomen Wr iyht asked lE ns a GouncllmemLer, and when she le un Clty
buaine ee, can she be reimbursed Ry the City for those expenses.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated ye e.
councilwoman Wright asked if some of these expenses could 6e deducted on her
income tax.
James Markmnnr City Attorney, etatad he did not know.
City Council Hinutee
October 4, 1909
Page 14
Councilwoman Wtight stated that she personally checked with her Certified Public
Accountant, and they can be deducted.
Councilwoman Brown stated she was not questioning whether the City Council
should be given the increase in salary, but had a problem with who would be
approving the increase.
ORDINANCE NO. 10-B (second reading(
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CllCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMEND ZNG SECTIONS 2.16.020 AND 2.16.030
OF THE PANCHO CUCAMONGA HUNICI PAL CODE PERTAINING TO SALARIES
FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of
Ordinance No. 10-B. Hot ion carried unanimously, 5-0.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 30-
5. Motion carried 3-2 (Brown, Wright nod.
R R • R R
(.ate\,I~l.tlL'V_(J~i~il?I f433i1a_.1'lSillJ
Fl, VACATION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD - PLAZA DE LAS BRISAS - ON FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD AT THE SOU ST CO ULHVARD AND AAMONA AVENUE.
APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET WIDE AND 566 PBHT LONG - APN 208-301-16. 16. 17 (Continued
f rnm Cwnf ~wN~n R 1OA01 CRnff n mM n nonln~ N, .inn Mnfa oee....: awn ri..:l
Engineer.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. R9-473
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFOANIAr OPDERING TO BS VACATED, THE FRONTAGE
ROAD - PLA2x DE LAS BRISAS - AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET
WIDE AND 544 FEET LONG - APN 206-301-16r 16, 17
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve Aeaolut ion No. 89-
.77. McClon carried uumilmuue iv. 6-0.
• R R R f
F2. CONSIDBMTION OP THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AND II AND
ISSUANC 0 S BAL NU S E
IMPROVEMENTS PROM SOUTH OF BANYAN STAEBT TO HILLSIDE BOULEVARD - Recommend that
the City Council accept and approve the Bnvlronmenial Initial Study, Perte I and
II for the proposed Archibald Avenue Street ImFrovemente and issuance of
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 15
Negative Declaration therefore and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of
Determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff
report presented Dy Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer.
Mayoc Stout opened the meeting far public hearing. There being ~o reaponee, the
public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION N0. 89-404
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOA THE
PROPOSED ARCNIBALD AVENUE STAEHT IMPROVEMENTS PROM SOUTH OF
BANYAN STREET TO HILLSIDE ROAD
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 89-
474. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• • • ~ • e
O, PUALIC HEARINGS
No Items Submitted.
N. CITY MANAGNR'B STAFF RNPORT9
H1. APPROVAL TO ADOPT THE DRAFT MVLTIHAZARD EMERGENCY SERVICES PLAN FOR THE
CITY OF PANCHO CVCAMONGA WHICH WILL PROVID& FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF EMERGENCY
SERVICES AND COOAD INATION OF EMERGENCY FUNCTIONS WITHIN THE CITY RND WITH OTHER
PUAJ.IC AGENCIES PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVAT PSRSOt'S Continued from
September 6, 1989. Staff report presented by Marti Higgins, Disaster
Yreparadneee Coordinator.
Mayor Stout reterred to a memorandum that had been written by Marti Higgins,
Disaster Preparetlneea Coordinator, datetl September 28 which was before the
Council, and the information that wee provided to the Council about the
Emergency Plan. He further asked Lf there would be a problem with both of the
emergency facilities being eo cloae together.
Marti Higgins, ^isaeter Preparedness Coordinator, stated her staff Le working
o:. hi- and stated that she fe it rhn ea_me way, Decauee if a dicaeisr d occ,.
in this area, Doth sites would be Snoperable. She added they are eetabliehing
a policy for a minimal distance between the emergency fecllitiee.
Councilwoman Wright felt the Subcommittee for Dieaeter Preparedness would
poeaibly be more knowledgeable to act es the people in charge for the Dieaeter
Council, rather than the Mayorr since they were working with these issues more
closely, and asked it this could possibly be changed in the Ordinance previously
adopted.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 16
Mayor stout stated he agreed with this
Councilman Buquet felt it was done this way because of legal requirements. He
felt this should be checked into.
Jack Lam, City Manager, asked if this can be taken ae direction to check into
the Ordina ^,ce, bur asked to go ahead with the adoption of the document presented
tonight.
Councilman Buquet stated he felt the City Yard would be s more appropriate place
for an emergency center location.
Councilman Alexander stated that previously he had had many queatione, and now
felt the plan was acceptable to him.
Mayor Stout stated he felt the City ie better prepared for an emergency Decauee
of the work that Marti Hlggina hoe done.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-613
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, ADOPTING A DRAFT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
PLAN
MOTi.ON: Roved by stout, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution Nc. 89-413.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
. • • . . .
H2. STATUS REPORT ON ACTIVITIES IN TNB VICINITY OF LABOR CANP Continued from
September 20, 1989. Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Sr. Administrative
Assistant, who stated that work would commence on October 12 to begin clearing
the Labor Camp site, and that if this did not happen, he would report back to
the City Council.
ACTION: Report receivetl and filed
' ~ . . . . .
N3. CONSIDERATION OP CONCBPTS AND PO ICY APPL ICAB E TO .NDSCAP MAINTENANCE
^ISTRICT NO. 1 sta[f report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy Ciiy Manager.
Ccuaci l;.roman Wright asked lC deveiooment policies requires atl developers tc
establish a maintenance dletrict on all perimeters of their development.
Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated yes, that all propertlee ae they are
developed are annexed into one oP the City's seven landscape dietrlete.
councilwoman Wright clarif led her quest lon by asking Sf the deve leper is
required to put in improvements on ell of the perimeters o[ their development.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 17
Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated yea, and that they are annexed into
one o£ the districts they are tn, and that district will maintain this only
after the city accepts the improvements and meats the city's standards.
Rues Maguire, City Engineer, further clarified that all development, the
property itself, i9 annexed into the dletricC for the purpose of assessment,
net all developments have landscape improvements.
Counci _raoman Wr igh[ asked .. the aeeeeemente that have been collected from
Assessment District One? 1) what are the chances of that money being used to
actually maintain that perimeter, and 1) is every perimeter that is in the
assessment district maintained ae much as ie necessary for that perimeter.
Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, et ated that it ie maintained, but could not
say that the perimeter ie maintained at the level that it should De. He stated
that in Landscape District One the City contracts for maintenance of that
district, and that it may not be at the level it should be.
Russ Hagu ire, City Engineers stated what you get ie a variation of what was
originally installed, but that each particular item ie maintained to the level
of what was originally installed.
Councilwoman Wright asked if the money that Le collected from a specific area
will be used to maintain that parkway to the level that it Wae installed, and
ie that being done.
Rues Maguire, City Engineer, ei ated yes for all parkways in District One.
Councilmambo- ,.__. ,,. sic more would come out on this when the capital
improvements were discussed.
Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, stated he would be happy to provide the Council in
summary form the demand level of service and responses in the city's contracts.
Councilwoman Wright suggested that possibly maintenance requirements be made
stronger and that people would be willing to pay a little more if they would get
better service. Shs felt we should go back and demand more from the developer
also so that all distri~ are ae well-kept ae the next.
Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, stated that any new tract that has a parkway in
District One has to meet the same standards ae a planned community.
Councilmeniber Alexander stated that po9et61y a quest SOnnalre be sent c__ .- lbs
residents in uia*rict One asking ii they would be willing to pay more `tovhave
a higher level of service.
Hayor Stout added that possibly some of the people that ere not in a district
would want to be part of a district because they can see Dow good the teat of
the City looks, and felt it was time that they were asked this question.
Clty Council Minuiee
October 4, 1989
Page 1H
Councilwoman Brown added she Eelt the people where not educated as to how the
landscape districts work, and that pose ibly the amount paid into District One
should be increased.
Councilmember Buquet stated he felt there were a lot of people that would be
willing to join a district, and felt the City should use better planning as to
what fal's into a district.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
1 • R • • >
H4. CONSIDERATION OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ELIGIBLE TO BE PUNDED FROM LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 IN THE AMOVNT OF 120 000 00 (ITEM TO BE CONTINUED
TO OCTOBER 18, 1989)
ACTION: Item continued to the October 10, 1989 meeting.
• • • • • •
H5. CONSIDERATION TO It¢LEMENT PILOT G FFITI PEMOV PROGRAM NORTH OP 8TH
STREET. WEST OP BARER ALONG T P ATCHISON. TOPElW AND SANTA FF. Staff report
presented by Jerry Pulwood, Deputy city Hanger, who stated that Deputy
Marhoefer, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station, would help him with the elide
presentation.
• • • • • w
Mayor Stout called a recess at H:BD p. m. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m.
with all members of Council present.
Slide presentation was made by Jerry Pulwood, Deputy city Manager, and Deputy
Marhoefer, Sheriff's 5tat ion.
Jerry Fulwootl, Deputy City Manager, stated staff is requesting the City Council
to allocate 59,000.00 for'the implementation of a pilot graffiti removal proycam
along the railroad right-of-way, north of Bth Strest, west of Maker. He stated
he would be reporting back to the Clty Council in the future with a et atua
report on the program.
.c,.nc i~_an AlexaLdar stated he wouid be in favor nt the pMgrs_T.
Depu ry Marhoefer, Sheriff's Station, suggested that once the City starts this
type of program, that they do not eiop.
Councilman Buquet felt this waa a good flrat step, but that the City needed a
long term plan in working with the County end the re llroad to eiop the graff itl
problem. He added that he felt Lhe City should make the people lnvo lved in the
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 19
graffiti pay to have it cleaned up. He further suggested that possibly the City
install a chain link fence along this area to keep the gangs from writing the
graffiti,
Councilwoman Brown stated she agreed with Councilman Baguet, and that the gangs
are starting to head to the northern portion of the City.
Councilwoman Wright stated she xelt the City should do easething about this area
because the people in the southern portion of the City are also part of the city
of Rancho Cucamonga. She spoke about the C.H.O.I.C.E.S. program, whereby
individuals come to the School Districts and talk to the children about gang
related matters. She stated she liked Councilman euquet'a idea of having the
people putting on the graff ili paying to have it removed,
Councilman Buquet felt we should get the railroad involved in preventing the
graffiti from haopening.
Councilwoman Brawn felt the County should also get involved.
Mayor Stout suggested that the 59,000.00, and that staff make a major effort Lo
preventing graffiti from occurringr be epproved.
Cov ncilman Alexander stated he would like to see this come back in November far
an update.
Mayor Stout openetl the meeting Eor public hearing. Addressing Council wee:
M~a. Terrell. who felt whatever can be done should be started ae soon as
possible,
There being no further public response, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to begin the pilot program
immediately. Motion carried unaninously, 5-0.
. . . . ~ .
M6. 9NSIDEAAT ION TO REPROVE THE LARE D65IGN OPTION OF THE LAREB AND PARKS
PORTION OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMDNITY Staff report prevented by Joe
Schultz, Community Services Manager.
Councilwoman Brown asked what is it going io coat to maintain the lakes.
Soe Schultz, Community Services Manager, stated that once this plan is epproved,
he will go back and work up the numbetsr and be able to tell her at that time.
Councilwoman Brown did not feel she wanted to vote for the concept if she could
not vote for the coat of it, and that ie why she would like to know what the
cost involved ie.
Councilwoman Wright asked how deep the lekee would be.
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 20
Joe Schultz, Community Services Maneger, stated it was not determined at this
time.
Cou rc ilwoman Wright asked about the security for the lakes, and asked that if
the perimeter of Lhe lake wne a certain distance, was there a requirement of how
deep the lake ahau ld be.
Joe Schultz, Conununity Services Manager, stated he felt that would have to be
determined at a later date.
Councilwoman Wright asked where the water was to come from.
Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, stet ed these 9u eatione would have to be answered
in the future.
Councilwoman Wright stated that she would like this to be written in layman's
terms eo it would be easier to understand. She asked how close will the houaee
be to the lakes, and asked what the setbacks ware.
Joe Schultz, Community 5ervicee Manager, felt Mr. Bailey with Lhe William Lyon
Company could answer these questions nwre appropriately.
Councilwoman Wright felt we should move slowly with this until all the queationa
were answered.
Councilman Buquet felt we should be careful before we get too far into this, and
that we should move slowly.
Add ree sing the City Council wee:
Jim Bailey, William Lyon Company, who et ated he hoe been working on this
project for over five years, and asked that the City Council give approval
on Lhe plan if they did like the design of it. Ne et ated he would like
to know that the plan is what the City Council likes, and the[ he is
headed in the tight direction.
Councilwoman Wright asked how close the houses will De to the lakes.
Jim Bailey, William Lyon Company, pointed out on the drawings to
CouncLlwoman Wright how Lhie will be designed, ae to where the houaee end
apartments will be poe itioned; and how they will be Eenced. Mr. Bailey
asked Brad Buller, City Planner, to ba sure that every City Counc ilmember
gate ccpiea of these plans.
Jack Lam, City Maneger, stated that if the City Council approves th ia, that
everyone involved will go bnck and work out the details and figures for it.
NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexnnder to approve the lake design
option of the lakes and parka portion of the Vletoria Planned Community. Motion
carried unaninouely, 5-0.
City Council Hinutee
October 4, 3989
Page 21
R• f R R R
H7. A PROV OP F VE Y P OJS L ST USE OF THE CITY•S OCAL STREET
AND ARTERIALS SHARE OP THB SALES TAX TRANSPORTATION FUND (MEASURE I1 Staff
report presented by Auee Maguire, City Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-475
R RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF TN8 CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ApPROVI NG A PIV6 YEAR PROJECT LIST POA
THE LOCAL STREETS AND ARTERIALS SHARE OP THE LOCAL SALES TAX
TRANSPORTATION FUND PURSUANT TO THE AEVISEO SAN BERNAADINO
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ZMPAOVEMBNT AND TRAPPIC MANAGEHENT
PROGRAM (MEASVRE T)
MOTION: Moved by BYOWn, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution No. 89-475.
notion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• R • f R R
H8. REVIEW OF LAW BNPORC6!ffiNT STVDY RE(~IEST POR PROPOSAL Staff report
presented by Jack Lem, city Manager.
councilwoman Brown concurretl with the meeting between Lhe Council and the
Sheriff, but that it should be within the next month, instead of hold inq things
up ary longer.
Councilwoman Wright stated she wonld like the City Cnunrlf • ...___ .....,. ,..,~
ew^ri"_ tc....a ~,.a city gate started wish the Law Enforcement Study'
MayoY Stout referred to a previous meeting with Oick Williams and Tom Wickum of
the Sheriff's Department of San Bernardino County, who stated they had no
problem with the Ciiy conducting the survey, and that they would work with the
City on the study.
Councilman Buquet stated the firm hired to do the study should be unbiased and
that this matter shoo ld bs settled ae quickly es possible.
Mayor Stout suggested Life City set a date for the Request For Propoeple (APP)
to go out, and set a meeting dote with the Sheriff before the RFP'e 90 out, and
that this De done prior to November 1, 1989.
MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to meet with the Sheriff a,-.d
any aonrnpzis^_e staff, Bud to proceed with the Request for Proposals for the Law
Enforcement Study, of which all is to take place prior to November I, 1989.
Motion serried unanimously, 5-O,
R R• f f f
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 22
I1. UP ON NORDIC D VEIAP ORAL REPORT Staff report prep anted by
Jerry Grant, Building Of£ic ial.
Mayor Stout asked about the tnveetigation of the Chino ordinance.
Jerry Grant, Building Official, stated it would be diecu esed at a meeting Chia
coming Friday, and that he hoe bean working with Rick Gomez, the Ccmmunity
OevelapniE nt Director, on this ieeue.
Hayor Stout stated he would like to see something done with this as soon as
possible.
Councilman Buquet stated he felt the City needs to be careful and not cross the
line as to the City's reepone ibility in these problems. He felt we should be
obis to come up with some kind of answer to these problems.
councilwoman Hrown stated they will De meeting every Priday with the homeowners
to addreae the concerns, and that they should have a reporC come back i.n four
weeks uptlat ing the City Council.
Hayor stout suggested that someone from Chino come to one of the 5ubc omm ittee
meetings Co diecuee the ordinance.
ACTION: Report received end filed.
r r x
I2. STATUS REPORT ON TIIUCR PARRIN6 ON POOTHTi.T. Rnrrt.RVaNn evn•wvs.. w_ _ _ _
RAMONA Staff report praeentetl by Rusa Maquira, City Bngineer, Who stated the
signs are going to be metalled.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
x • . x . x
I3. REPORT ON D CLOSURE STATEMENT TIVE TO THE AOCR C BHER
Councilwoman Brown et ateSthat the reason she had this put on ie that in some
of her diecuseions with ree idente in the Caryn Community and Compaea Roee, it
was brought to her attention that Lhe diecloauzes that the City Counc Ll approved
ae of sepiember 1, 1988 to be signed prior to the deposit of a home, have been
qu Lte the oppoeiCe. She felt it was Smpoztant fur the City staff to know who
the develooe re are eo that this car. be remedied. SDe stated she had atcn re s3
In the staff report that this ie voluntary.
Brad Buller, CSty Planner, stated that there were some contlitione in which it
was requested on a voluntary baele of those projects Ghat had been approved
prior to the City taking action on this policy.
Mayor stout opened the meeting for publte input. Addreee ing the city Council
were:
City Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 23
John Scaff thanked the City Council for standing behind the citizens on
the rock crusher issue. He stated he was not aware o£ the rock crusher
going in when he bought hie house, and stated Lhai if this isn't stopped
immediately, he will go on with legal recourse.
Councilmember Huquet stated that it ie not a problem with our local Supervisor,
and that everyone should contact the other Supervisors to ge[ their support for
stopoing tote.
Rudolph Acevedo, Caryn tract, stated he found out about the rock crusher
after he had closed hie escrow.
Christina Haneri at ated she is moving into the same area ae Hr. Acevedo
and was also net told about it.
Berry Hillmer stated he had bought a home from Kaufman and Broad
approximately 2-1/2 years ago and was not told about the rock crusher.
Gerald Ranier et ated he had purchased a house from Kaufman and Broad, and
expressed hie concerns about the rock crusher. He asked what had happened
with the park that was to qo in the Caryn Development.
Councilwoman Brown et atad this would be disco seed ai the next meeting.
Dania Mueerbar, Caryn project, stated she had not been made aware of the
rock crusher either, and further added that the Brock Homes are not
disclosing this infarmatlon.
Char lee :iaynes, Caryn Homeowner's Aeeociat ion President, reported Che
disclosure problems he ie aware of.
There being no further response, Mayor Stout closed the public input session.
Councilwoman Brown felt the developers should be mode aware of this.
Brad Buller, City Planner, agreed.
Mayor Stout suggested t'~ a letter be sent to the residents to thle area
informing them of the Board of supervisors hearing dale.
Bratl Buller, City Planner, stated this would be done.
CounC liwoman Brown fait that the developers were making the pecple aware cf the
rock crusher in the beginning, but that she has now learned that it Se not being
done sue to the tees imony received tonight.
Counci lmember Huquet felt all effarta should be concentrnted towards the Board
of Supervisors hearings to try to get them to ekop the rock crusher.
City Council Ninutee
October 4, 1989
Page 24
ACTION: Report reeeived and filed.
x • • • ~ ~
I4. DIS U ION O RO L ON NT ON I PROPERTY Staff report
presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner.
Cou nci:.;oman Wright asked if the possibility of grant funds had bean Inoked
in W.
Larry Menderson, principal Planner, stated that they plan to bring back a
report in approximately a few weeks about the statue of the old Alta Loma area
and whether or not there should be a specific plan on that.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the Council was
Charlotte Carrara who stated she has no problem with the monument being
on her property, but that it is the lack of maintenance that she had the
problem with. She also stated she has no problem with it being moved, but
would like to see it memorialited.
Mayor Stout reported on a monument in Sacramento o£ those who had loot their
lives in Viet Nam, and suggested the roll call monument include the names of
these same individuals chat are from our city.
Counc ilmember Buquet stated he supported etaff•e recommendation, but felt the
monument should poe eibly go eome pinta like Heritage Park•
Cnerlotte Carrara asked if there could be an exception to the City's
ordinance dealing with the maintaining of monuments on private property.
Mayor Stout etatetl this would be looked into.
Charlotte Carrara stated she would hate to see this monument go to a
public perky but would like to see it stay in Alta Loma.
Counc ilwcman Wright asked that some klntl of celebration take place for this on
Vsterene Day. -~
MOTIONt Moved by Bu gust, seconded by Stout, to approve etaf t'e recommendation
allowing this to et ay in downtown Alta Loma (with renovations) and add the names
of Viet Nam Veterans From Rancho Cucamonga to this. Motion carried unanimously,
5-C.
~ • R R
S IONNTIlICATION OP ITBNB /OR M6IT I~NTINO
X71. Councilwoman Brown asked to bring the sollcitet ion ordinance back to city
Council with a provie ion to limit the hours of eolicitat ion in Che city. It was
asked that this be brought back at the October 18 meeting.
Ciiy Council Minutes
October 4, 1989
Page 25
J2. Councilwoman Brown would like an update on the Caryn project ae tc why
they have not mei City standards for tae October 1H mestiny.
J3. Councilwoman Wright requested a report come back to the Council on the
plane for Guaati Park so that Council input can be presented at the October 25
County meeting.
74. Coc..c ilman Buquet etas ed the Nordic eubcomoittee will be gluing an vodate-
75. Councilman Buquet would like a report on smoking vesicles in the City.
• 1 R e R f
R COIOHiMICAxIONB FROM THE POHLIC
K1. Diane Nilliams, 7251 Amethyst, stated she liked Councilwoman Brown's
suggestion about the raporL on solicitation and expressed her cancerne of being
approached in parking lose by solicitors.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated tae City Attorney will do a report on this.
f R tl R • f
L. AOJODHNIHSNNT
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Hrown to adjourn to the October 1C,
1989 joint meeting with the Chino Bealn Municipal Water District. Notion
carried unanimously 5-D. Meeting adjourned at 11:1'/ n.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
Approved:
October lOr 1909
CITY OF RANCY.O CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
J ' nt Me t' q
Joint Meeting of the City Council and the
Chino Basin Hunic ipal Water District
A. CALL TO ORDBA
A joint meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the chino
Basin Municipal Water District met on Tuesday, October 10, 1989, at the Lions
Park Community Cent¢r, 9161 Baae Line Aoad, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The
meeting was called to order at 7:10 P•m. 6y Hayor Dennis L. Stout.
PresenC were Counc Llmembera: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles
J. Buquet II, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also preeent were: Jeck tam, City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City
Hanager; Jerry H. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community DavelopT~ent
Director; Joe Schultz, Community Services Nenager; Diane O'Neal, Admin iaCr at iye
Analyst; Susan Mickey, Administrative Aide; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk.
preeent from Chino Bae in Municipal Water District (CBMWD) was the Board of
Directors cone feting of: Dwight Prench, Pzeeident (arrived 7:20 p.m.); Anne
Dunihue, Director; Bud Girard, Directors and John Anderson, Secretary-Treasurer.
Also preeent from CBMWD were Tom Homan, General Manager; and Doug Drury, Manager
of Operations.
Absent was Councilmember: Pamela J. Wright
Absent was Board member George Horha.
• • } } R R
Tom Homan. General Hanager, introduced the members of the Board of Directors and
explained the diiierant nrcaa they covered.
R • R R } R
B. ITBMB O! DIACUBBION
B1. o r 'ew of D1 t ict Ooerntione
City Council Minutes
October 30, 1989
Page 2
Tom Homan, General Manager stated CBMWD serves the west end of the county,
consisting of Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Montclair, Chino, Chino Hills
and the Agricultural Preserve. The District was formed in 1950, and covers
approximately 250 square miles in the west end of San Bernardino Ccunty,
servicing a population of 500,000, and is governed by an elected Boacd of five
members. He stated their current budget ie $98 million, which consists mostly
of capital improvement e. The four major areas they deal in are as wholesale
water agEncy for imported water, operating a non-reclaimable waste system,
regional sewage treatment/reclamation syeiem, and their groundwater basin
management.
He explained their feeder system through the area, and how as a member of the
Metropolitan Water District they are allowed to purchase imported water from
the Colorado River. Ne 9i ated that their program ae wholesale operator to local
companies (i.e., Cucamonga County Water District) ie funded through user fees
and does not rely on taxes to support the eyetem.
He stated their non-reclaimable waste program was started in the mid-60's to
service industries that could not discharge their wastes into the ground. They
built the eyetem through a bond issue, then brought it into the Loe Angeles and
orange county waste systems for disposal. Their capacity for the Loe Angeles
Sanitation District Le 16 million gallons, and 2-1/2 million gallons for the
Orange County Sanitation District. They currently have approximately 40
intluatries connected to their system, which are serviced either by direct
cocnection to a pipeline, or by Lruckiny their wastes to a designated site.
He explained that the groundwater basin is Ln the upper watershed area with
distribution through the Santa Ana River, which del ivere approximately l5a cf
orange County's water supply. In 1960, Orange County became concerned about
development in the upper watershed area and how that would affect their water
supply and filed a laweu it against all of the users in the upper watershed area.
CBMWD, San Bernardino Wflter Dieir ict, and Western Nunici pal Water District
intervened on behalf of the producers in that lawsuit and agreed upon a
settlement that these three agencies would guarantee to discharge 44,000 acre
Eeet to Orange County. CBMWD'e share of that ie 17,000 acre feet. CSMWD then
negotiated to purchase Che sewage ireaiment plants in the west end so that title
to the reclaimed waste water could be made to meet that obligation. The Dis [r ict
assumed ownership resport42bllity for maintaining the plants in exchange Eor the
water.
. • ~ • ~ ~
B2. Discuss ign of Diatrict'g °ff^-~ i1 Gro ~d Wa'a- Mai -ere-t
Tom Homan, General Manager, stated that Ln the mid-70'e there was concern about
the condition of the ground water basin, since the level was dropping ten Eeet
per ye at in some areas. SB222 was passed in the State legislature which
established a pump tax ($2.00 per acre foot), and those generated funds were used
to perform a study of the basin, which led to an adJ udlcation in 1978. The
result of the adjudication was that a safe yield of groundwater was determined
to be 140,000 acre feet per year. The master plan that reau lted called for a
City Con ncil Minutes
October 10, 1989
Page 3
system of aeeeesmenta for anyone who excessively pampa water from the ground
water basin. The revenue generated from the assessments ie used to buy State
project water which ie used in spreading Daeins to replenish the ground water
basin. The adjudication ie monitored by a Water Ma stet appointed by the court,
which ie the CBMWD Board of Directors. He stated the amount of water used last
year in the Chino area was 270,000 acre feet, and the deficit was made up from
other water.
He stated the Cucamonga ground water basin is separate, and is controlled by
Cucamonga County Water District. He stated moat of water used by Rancho
Cucamonga ie from there. He covered some of the future problems with the ground
water basin due to the amount of nitrates in the ground water, and discus sad the
groun~ water management plan they are developing to keep the aituat ion under
coot zol.
• • • • • ~
83. Discussion of District's Regional Bewage Program.
Tom Homan, General Manager, gave an overview of the various regional sewage
treatment plants that service our area, their capacity, construction planer and
costa involved in funding and operating the plants. He stated that CBMWD has
a regional performance plan that covers a 10 year span which ie updated annually.
Their calculations of funds needed for this time period ie $430 million, with
$130 million of that dlractly related to new regulat lone from the Environmental
Protection Agency and the Siaie of California.
e4. Discussion of Waste Water Reclamation.
Tom Homan, General Manager, diecueeed the Water Master report which showed
initially CBMWD started at zero for their contribution to the reclamation
program, but that around 1980 they began to discharge more than their obligation
of 17,000 acre feet to [he Bents Ana River. He diecueeed ways that CBMWD is
exploring to reuse waste water that would increase co et effectiveneee and utilize
all the treatment plant e, while addressing the environmental issues, not only
of the Ching 6ae in, but also of the downstream users. He stated that RP4 will
be the showpiece for waste'water reclamation, but the other plants will have come
type of program ae well.
~ n r, n . .
~5. Resort on £r. irs„r~artal Aegu let=one ttat_Affect Dist rlet OGei aL:ona.
Tom Homan, General Nanager, explained that moat of what they do et CBMWD is
impacted by environmental raga lationer whet het Stater Federal or Local. Ne gave
en overview of the evolvement of standards from the early 1970•e, and how they
have gone from aecordary treatment to tertiary treatment. He etetad there ere
more regulations pending regarding toxic materiels, and how passage of these
regulations will affect CBMWD and thalr coat of operating.
City Council Minutes
October 10, 1989
Page d
k • R R R
Maycr Stovt asked about the phasing of Plant d,
Tom Homan, General Manager, stated they ate in preliminary engineering, and they
have retained a consultant who ie working on the Environmental Impact Report
(F.IRi. They expect the EIR to be completed in a year, then tleaign and
con et rut ion will follow.
Mayor Stout asked if there was a rel ationahip between the dairy industry and the
condition of the groundwater.
Tem Homan, General Manager, et at ed the dairy industry would have an impact, some
nitrates can be attributed to agricultural practices, but not neceeearily to the
dairy industry. He stated it takes 3o-5G years for a chemical to get into the
groundwater system.
Mayor Stout asked about the offensive odor that is noticeable from RP1 sometimes,
and asked if that could be attributed to weather conditions.
Tom Homan, General Manager, stated that both RP1 and RP2 were built in the 1940's
and ware not designed to have a high level of odor control, and there were no
land use conflicts until recent development around the plants. He stated Che
new plants will have odor control designed in.
Mayor Stout asked if the technology was available to eliminate odors in the
Future.
I ~~ roman, uenecel Manager, stated they do have the technology for odor control,
and that it ie much easier to install when building a new plant, but it is
difficult when trying to retrofit a plant. They are trying to do what they can
though to retrofit the older plants to control odors.
Anne Dunihue, Director, felt that some of the odor problem was caused 6y
construction at RPI when it was being enlarged.
Dwight French, President, etatetl they could take people to the new plants that
had odor control when bhey were constructed to show them the effects of the
[ethnology.
Councilwoman Brown asked about the sludge issue and how the City could help with
the sewer lines ana eeptLc tanks.
..sight 1mmi~, Pree Ldent, stated the pumpLn9 from the septic tanks is a small
amount compared to their overall sludge problem. When there were att LClee about
the eludga problem, at thei time CBMWD wee the only depository for septic tanks
servicing all of San Bernardino County, end a portion of Riverside County ae
well. Since then they have cut back to servicing only within the Chino basin,
and pcoduction from septic tanks within the Chino basin to very little. Some
of the areas they are looking at to recycle the eludga is to compoeC Lt with the
dairy industry, and then distribute it for retail Bala for garden compost, and
City Council Minutes
October 10, 1989
Page 5
they also have an agreement with a firm to mix the sludge with kiln duet to uee
ae a cover material for landfills.
Councilwoman Brown asked that if continuing to build septic tanks in Rancho
Cucamonga will not affect their business.
Bud Girard. Director, stated it would not affect the sludge problem, but it will
continue co affect the ground water quality.
Mayor Stout asked if they would prefer that Rancho Cucamonga not allow septic
tanks anymore.
Councilwoman Brown asked if it would increase the nitrate level in the grountl
water.
Bud Gitard, Oitector, stated yea it Would, that looking back in past records,
it was domestic waste treatment ai RP1 that greatly increased the nitrate content
in the ground water.
Mayor Stout asked if the amount of septic tanks found in the northern part of
the City is affecting the Cucamonga County water District ground water basin.
Dwight French, President, stated not ae much ae peat agricultural pro eticea in
that area.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated It also hoe to tlo with the
level of the ground water, antl In those areas the levels are quite low, so that
when you do uee eentic Lanka the imoact ie Greater.
Councilman Buquet felt that it we keep putting more and mare in, eventually it
will have to work its way down.
Uwight French, President, et ated that in some areas all of the water going into
the ground water basin is coming from reuse. Ne feels that you will see a
greater impact on the ground water basin from lawn fart ilizera and chemicals,
than from aept is tanks. of course the beet action would be to have no septic
tanks and have control through the treatment plants.
Councilman Alexander asked what could Rancho Cucamonga do to set an example.
Dwight Prench, President, stated that getting the treatment plants in, and
encouraging xeriscaping In the community eo that not only would lees water be
used f.._ ,.. ^igat ion, Cut leas cnsmieals wcu ld be used is keep unau .able pia ;ta
for the^area lush looking.
Anne Dunihue, Director, stated another thing that cities will have to start
looking at ie using a dual water eyetem, 1.s., reclaimed water for lawns and
fresh water for tlomeat is uee.
Mayor Stout asked if there wee something they could do io control people from
putting things Lnto the newer eyetem that shouldn't 6e.
City Council Hinutee
October 30, 1999
Page 6
Dwight French, Preeident, stated Cucamonga County Water Die[rict is supposed to
monitor what ie being dumped info the sewer ae a contracting agency for CBMWD,
but of course any action from the City to help monitor would improve the
aituat ion.
Councilman Buquet stated one possibility would be when an industrial operation
comes into to the City would be to require trap inetallatione that would be
easily ..cceesible for monitoring their discharge.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated their are new regular ions for cit tee regarding
storm water.
Aick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated this goes Dack to the
fectilizare and chemicals used in yards.
Dwight French, Preeident, stated they will probably have to start treating storm
water.
Jack Lam, city Hanager, asked Sf positions have changed on septic tanks due to
environmental rrgulatione or for other reasons, because ion years ago Cucamonga
County Water District wee encouraging eept is tanks for ground Water recharge.
Were they doing that for lack of knowledge of environmental impact, or are we
more concerned now because of increased regulations.
Dwight French, Preeident, stated he didn't feel that anyone knows yet what the
real impact of eept is tanks ere 6ecauee there hoe not been enough time to study
it yet and see the affect e. There are concerns about health impacts, but he
doesn't feel anyone Could tell you whet that impact ie, so 1t would ba difficn It
to say 1i an agency was practicing incorrect policy or not•
. x . w x .
John Anderson, Secretary-Treasurer, left the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
• w .
Mayor Stout stated there ie a problem with the septic tanks anyway 6ecauee people
haven't maintained thenr~and are taking washing machine water, etc., and dumping
it illegally and causing health problems.
Dwight French, President, etatad the sewer system ie a more positive way to
dispose of sewage. Part of the legacy of the County is that their requ latione
on septic systems were not very goad and the systems were undersize.
Councilwoman Brawn etatad she felt that 6ecauee of the increase of development
In the City, the people who nre doing the installing of the eept le tanks don't
know what they are doing. She Eelt that quellfied people were too few, eo she
expects to see more problems beceuee of that.
City Council Minutes
Octrber 10, 1989
Page 7
Dwight French, Preeldeni, stated there will be the same type of problem when
contractors are Lnetalling sewers, there will be few goal ifiad people to do the
work.
Councilman Huquet asked about storm water reclamation, and asked if large parcels
of several hundred acres could serve ae reclamation baeine.
Dwight F. ench, President, staled there are currently recharge baeine in the
rcrthern part of Lhe City.
Bud Girard, Director, stated they are using old gravel pits along the Los Angeles
County border, Dut they ar¢ limited in how much they can use those basins because
midges uea them ae breeding grounds, or they would use them more.
Dwight French, President, stated that in the son Gabriel Valley area the g: oval
operators have come too close to the ground water level so it makes the old
gravel pits vopractical to use. He stated all of their water ie being reclaimed,
but he would like to see it ueed at least once in this basin before it is
released to Orange County, which would also help them cut down on importing
water.
Deborah Brown stated she hoe heard that toilets that are ueed at the airport and
in some restaurants uea only one gallon of water to flush as opposed to the
standard toilet, and was wondering if that was true. She also wondered if it
would help if the City required developers to install that type of toilet in
residential developments.
Tom Homan, General Manage[, stated ye e, those toilets do use less water Mir h=
Lae i,eeru nuxea reports about them. He hoe heard it takes 2-3 fluehea to make
them work, eo your eavinge are to at.
Anne Dunihu9, Director, stated there might be a problem because the sewer lines
are made for five gallon capacity and felt there might not be enough water to
push the sewage down the line.
Mayor Stout asked if the City was to use reclaimed water for the parka, lakes,
etc., ie it cheaper than the regular water to the point where they could justify
putting in a secondary wMer eyetem for reclaimed water eyetem.
Dwight French, President, stated right now their contract provides for CSHWD to
sell reclaimed water beck to the servicing agencies for the coat of tertiary
treatment. He felt they needed to get with all of their eezvici nq agencies and
regionalize their water, and try to get the right kind of agrcer„e :ta In place
with the gr:.ernruaut. i'hue if reclaimed water was ueed instead of domestic water,
that would give a credit to the domestic user to be able to take more water out
of the basin at a lower price. He felt iE they had those kind of agreements in
place, they could almost glue away the reclaimed water, eo Che cost of the dual
eyetem ie just for the inetellat ion of the eyetem. He felt this would benefit
everyone.
City Council Minutes
October 30, 1989
Page e
Mayor Stout asked if Rancho Ncamonga would be dealing through the Cucanronga
County Water District.
Dwight French, Pres identr stated yea, they are CBMWD'e contracting agency.
+ . . .
C CONWORIGTIOMS PR011 THE PBBLIC
There were none.
k f f
P. AD.lOBRNIBOPr
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded 6y Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried,
4-0-1 (Wright absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
Aeepectfully submitted,
Jan Sutton
Deputy City Claris
Approved:
October 18, 1989
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINOTES
R_evular Meeting
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga met on
Wednesday, October 18, 1989, in the Lions Park Co:anunity Center, 9161 Dase Line
Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:35
p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles
J. euquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
A 1eo present were: Jack Lam, Clty Mnneger; Andy Arczyneki, Deputy City
Attorney; Jerry 8. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City
Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner;
..a rcy Aendereon, Principal Planner; Hlki Bzatt, Associate Planner; Russ Maguire,
City Engineer; Joe Stof a, Assoc iate Civll Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building
Of£ic ial; Jim Martin, Plan Check Coord inatoi; Jos Schultz, community Services
MananPr: nunnn A. Ra 4oc Cr ARmtnl of oaf :..e ne
Administrative Analyst; Susan Mickey, Admini st rative ^«Aide; Patty Aiffel,
Executive Aeaist ant; and Debra J. Adams, Clty Clerk
a • a • • x
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of 10-Year Pin to Dave Leonard.
Nave Leonard could not be present, so thle was continued to the November 1, 1989
meeting.
a2. Pre9e n[at ion of Proclamation Observing Red Rlbnon Week, October 22 - 28,
Mayor Stcut presented the proclamation.
M k f R
03. Preeentat ion to CAEA (Citi zene Against Subet ante Abuse) Network.
tlayor Stout made the presentation.
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 2
86. Recognition of Local HfPOrte to Combat Substance Abuse.
Students from the City were recognized for their effort e, and they spoke about
their program to combat substance abuse.
. . . x t
C. COIOIfMIGTIOM3 IRON TBB PVBLIC
Chuck Haynes, President of Caryn Homeowner's Association asked that their
proposal for truck routes on Milliken and Highland be placed on the November 1,
1989 agenda. He read the following letter to be included ae part of the record:
"Mamba re of the City Council
10-18-89
We would ask that you place on the agenda for the next available City Ccuncil
meeting our proposal regarding truck routes on Miliken (sic) and Highland
Avenue.
We have all been fighting together to secure a peaceful en•iironment for
ourselves and our children with regards to the rock quarry, now working in our
back yartls. The city has spend house exnau sting every effort to stop this
intrusion. Tne residents are also speaking out. our proposal to the City
Council ie to act before, not after, when we are faced with add it ioanl (sic)
site. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga alonga with the Traffic
Engineers to study and act for a delition (sic) of Miliken (sic) and Haven
Avenue ae a truck route. In recent days I have counted no le ea than 78 trucks
using Miliken (sic) and turning onto Banyan or Highland. The noise antl
vibration alone ie too much of a burden to be placed on homeowners of Caryn or
Victoria.
Geological reports will show we are sitting on an alluvial fan. There ie no
hard rock until you get down further. The duet and brush you see (on a clear
day) Bitting down along die i0 freeway Le the top soil from the foothills after
years of being washed down. Our etreeta, although engineered to hold traffic
will require continued maintance (sic) with the truck traffic that we have see
(sic) from [he quarry site. It will require money from the Clty and the
taxpayers who have been fighting this quarry operation. We will not be able to
4J to irorm Johnson end ask him to nay fnr road maLnt 3nre (a~~) wo kno•.• this
is within the scope of the city Council and can be acted upon. In blunt terms
ladtliea (sic) and gent lemon, we can put 1t to him before he pate it to us again.
We have the opportunity now to atop thin before it gate going. In moat cases
later ie never better. We need Co edtlrese Chie Seeue now.
Thank you for allowing me this opportunity and for your consideration - I thank
you.
City Council Minu tee
October 18, 1989
Page 3
CRarles L. Haynear President
Caryn Homeowners Organization"
Mayor Stout asked that Lhie coma back on the November 1, 1989 agenda.
• w . . . .
D. CONSENT CALBNDAR
D1. Approval of Warrant e, Register Nos. 10/4/89 and 10/11/89; and Payroll
ending 9/28/89 for the total amount of $2,616,730.28.
D2. Approval of David H. Griffith and Aeeociatea, Ltd. to Conduct a user Fee
and Co et Allocation Study (TO Be Funded from Account 01-4285-6028).
D3. Approval of Comp Plue to Conduct a Classification and Compenset ion Study
(TO ee Funded from Account 01-4124-6028).
D4. Approval of the Community Development Block Grant Housing Aeeiet ante Plan
- Staff ie recomaendlnq approval for the 19@9-90 Housing Assistance Plan which
ie the second annual increment of the three-year plan required of participants
in the Community Development Block Grant program of the Department of Housing
and Vrban Development. ITEM REMOVED PON DISCU68I0N BY COVNCILNONAN PRIORY
RESOLVTION NO. 89-476
A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO
rnrnunwra - ___ .. _._ . .___ __.._ ...- ........ .. ...... ......w.....: .:
THE HWSINGaT ASSISTANCE^^PLAN^ POR ^THE '^1989-90 -COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCS GRANT PROGRAM
D5. Approval to authorize the assignment of en Adult Crossing Guard at the
intersection of Terra Vista Parkway and Greenwich Place for Coyote Canyon
Elementary School.
D6. Approval to amend a Resolution of Summary Vacation of a portion of e
Utility and Drainage Easement, located went of Archihald Avenue and north of
Base Line Road - V-088, include ut Ll lty vacation.
RESOLUTION ti0. 8E-716A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CAL7FOAN M, AMENDING FFSOLUTIOH HO. ,,., ,.,,
SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OP A PORTION OF A UT IL ITY AND
DRAINAGH EASBtffiNT APPHCTING PARCHL 1 OP PARCHL MAP NO. 5792
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 4
D7. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-168) for the Etiwanda Cobblestone Curb
improvement Project located on the west aide of Etiwanda Avenue, north of
Victoria Street (Alternate B) awarded to Bay District Paving, Incorporated, foz
the amount of $30,516.00 ($27,742.10 plus 109 contingency) to be funded from
Beautification Punde, Account No. 21-4647-8822 (PY 88/89 and 89/90) Awarded
September 20, 1989.
D8. Approval to execute contract (CO 89-169) for the Hidden Farm Road Calvert
Zmprovement Project located seat of Carnelian on Hidden Farm Road awarded to Jim
L. Hubbe Construction for the amount of $79,077.00 ($71,888.00 plus lOk
contingency) to be funded with Drainage - General City Account No. 23-6637-8765
(FY 88/A9 and 89/90) Awarded October 4, 1989.
D9. Approval and execution of the 1989/90 City Wlde Tree Trimming Maintenance
Agreement (CO 89-170) to United Pacific Corporation of Santa Fe Springs,
California, for the amount of $130,000.00 io be funded by General Fund, ACCOanG
No. 01-4647-6028 (PY 89/90).
D10. Approval of Release of Agreement for Postponement of CC&R'¢ (CO 89-171)
for Tract 13441, located on the northeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and
Kenyon way.
RBSOLUTION N0. 89-477
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELBAS ING AN AGRHHMENT POA POSTPONEMENT
OF APPROVAL OP CCSR'9 FoR TRACT 13441
011. Approval of Release of Agreement fox Postponement of ccSF'e (CO 69-172)
for Tract 13442, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and
Kenyor. Way.
RESOLVTION NO. 89-478
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT ,
OF APPROVAL OP CC&R'S FOR TRACT 13442
D 12. Approval to release Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
(CO 89-173) (86-355440) releasing Assessor's Parcel No. 201-251-16 located at
6249 Archibald Avenue, submitted by Robert E. Reol le Sr. and Mary Lee Reolle.
RASOLVTCON Nn, 89-479
A RHSOL`1TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONOA, CALIFORNIA, AELBASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACT ANO LIEN AGREEMENT WITH R08ERT E. REOLLE SR. AND MARY
LES RHOLLS
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 5
D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Monume ntat ion
cash deposit for Tract 10246, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue
and Hillside Road, eubmitted by J.C.A. Dave Lopmant Company Partnership, and
release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement Security and Monumentation
deposit accepted by City Council on August 17, 1988, from Jung Hwang & Sone Real
Estate Partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-480
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TXE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVElUiNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 30246 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREElII:NT AND SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED eY CITY
COUNCIL ON AUGUST 17, 1988
D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance Dietrlei Noe. 1 and 6, for DR 87-34, located on the west aide of
Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, euDmitted by ARCM, Ltd., A California
Limited Partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-462
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCA.NONGA, CALL FOAfiI A, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO
SMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEN NO. DR 87-34
RBSOLIIT TON NO. R9-4Ai
A RESOLVTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTft ICT NO. 3 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 87-34
O15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering
the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Diet rict No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract 13810, located on the north side of
Hillside Road, 330 feeCTJeet of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Vic Patel.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-481
A RE3OLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCNO
WCAMONGA, CALIFORIZA, APPROVING IMPROVSMRN'f RGF.EEHENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND PINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13830
RESOLUTION N0. 89-482
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCZL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNYA, OAOERINC THB ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO 4ANOSCAP6 NAINTBNANCB DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13830
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page fi
O16. Approval of improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10349 located on the
west aide of Sapphire Stree[ at Thoroughbred Street, submitted by Walton
Associates.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-483
A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCY.O
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRF.RMP.NT
EXTENSION AND IHPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TRACT 10349
D17. Approval of Improvement Agreement Bxtension for Tract 12659-1 located on
the aouthweet corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street, submitted by Walton
Associatee.
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-484
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO
CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGAEEMBNT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVBMENT SECURITY POA TRACT 12659-1
D18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Cup 05-19 located on the
southwest corner cf Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue, eubm fitted by Ken Rudy
Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-485
A ASSOLVTIOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
rnrrnunurn _ _
EXTBNSION ANO IHPAOVEt~NT SECVRITYnPOR ,CUP 85-19 - Wy ...
D 19. Anproval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for:
Tract 13825 1 t tl n the ao ih id of Fi h A e u between Nr_rmosa
Avenue and Kinlock Avenue
Re leaee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 15,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Eond (Street) $ 1,500.00
RESOLUTION N0. 89-486
A RESOLUTION JA THR Ct TV mgryrlr. np THE rimy np paNCPp
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPAOVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13825 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP
COMPLETION POR THB WORR
City Council Hinutea
October 18, 1989
Page ]
T t 1355] 1 ated o th e t 'de f Sier e C e i V' L p t Mt
Sherman Court and N0. Waverly Court
Ae lease: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $100,500.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,050.00
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-487
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPT ING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13557 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION POR THE WORE
Tract 13342 located on the east aide of Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street
and Pinch Avenue
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $476,000.00
Faithful Performance Bond (Private
Street) $176,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 47,600.00
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Piivaie
Street) $ 17,600.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-488
-._.~nN n4 TVP nTTV MI,N/`tf, nR TYW /`TTV nP PaN!'Vi(1
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13342 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
Tract 13542 2 loc red on the east aide of Ca e e be wean Wilson
Avenue and Banvan Street
Ae lases: Fa Lthful Performance Bond (Street) $308,000.00
Faithful Performance Bond (Storm Dra.+n) $131,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 30,800.00
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Dratn) $ 13,100.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-489
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13542-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE Of
COMPLETION FOA THE WORK
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 8
Tracts 11606-2: 11606-3: 11606-1 & -3 Storm Orain located on the south
side of Victoria Street between Haven Avenue and Oe er Creek Channel
Tract 11606-2
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $276,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Hortd (Street) $ 27,600.00
Tract 11606-4
Releaae: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $190,000.00
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 19,000.00
Tract 11606-1 6 -3 Storm Drain
Releaae: Faithful Performance Bond $220,000.00
Accept: Haintenance Guarantee Bond $ 22,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 89-490
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CL'CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC iMPAOVEMENTS FOA
TRACT NOS. 11606-2, 11606-4, 11606-3 AND -3 STORM DRAIN AND
AUTHORIZING THE PILZNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent
calendar, less item D4. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
CISCCSSION OF ITEM D4. Approval of the Community Development Block Grant
Housing Resistance Plan - Staff ie recommending approval for the 1989-90 Houaing
Assistance Plen which is the second annual increment of the three-year plan
required of participants in the Community Development Block Grant program of the
Department of Houaing anC'arban Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 89-676
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CS TY OF RANCHO
..JCP.MOHGA, CALIFORNIA, RDOFT P.:G THE GECCY.O YEAR I.CREHENT OF
THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOA THE 1989-90• COMMVNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOC% GRANT PROGRAM
MOTION: Moved by Wrightr seconded by Brown to approve Reaolut ion 87-476.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• • +
City Council Minutes
October 1R, 1989
Paqe 9
6CONSBNT 9RDINANCEB
No Items Submitted.
: + + x • x
f. ADV6RTISBD PVBLIC BEARINGS
I[ema F1, F2 and F3 were heard together.
F1. ENVIRONMENT AS SS T D OEVB P NT DIS ICTS AMENDMENT 99-C2
ELACKMON HOMES, INCORPORATED - A request t0 pYe-zone approximately 25 acres
located on the northeast corner of Highland and Aocheat er Avenuea to Low Density
Residential (2-d dwelling unite per acre) - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, 04 and 18.
(Continued fm. 6epteebar 20, 1989) St aft report presented by Larry Henderson,
Principal Planner.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council
was:
Norm Canchola, Hameetead Land Development, apologized for the delay in
this being Drought before the City Council while they ware getting the
necae9ary information they needed. Ne stated they agreed with staff's
reremmerd atio.^. and looked Forward to working with the Ciry of Rancho
Cucamonga.
There being no fuYther Yeaponae, the public hearinn wan nlnn>.~
ORDINANCE NO. 400 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNC iL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 89-02, PRE-ZONING APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT
LAND TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS FER ACRE)
LOCATED AT TXB NORTHEAST CORNER OP HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER
AVENUES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEAEOP - APN 225-152-
01, 02, 03, OT, AND 18
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance 400.
MOTION: Noved by Alexander, seconded Dy Buquet to waive full reading of
ordinance No. d00 and set eecoP.d resd ing for ::cverber i, i9o9. Mocinn rarrled
unanimously, 5-0.
F2. ENVIRONMENTAt, ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREHMENT 89-03 - BLACI(MON HOMES
INCORPORATED - A request to approve a development agreement (CO 89-149) for
approximately 25 acres consisting of 78 resident Sal lots located aC the
northeast coineY of Highland end Rochester Avenuea - APN 225-352-01, 02, 03, 04
and 19. (Continued frw Septaeber 20, 1989)
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 10
ORIII NANCR NO. 401 (first reading)
AN OADINANC6 OP THE CITY COVNC IL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DSVSLOPMSNT AGREEMENT 89-G3
POR APPROXINATHLY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCATED AT THE
NORTHHAST CORIiBR OP HIGHLAND AND ROCAISSTER AVENUES, AND HARING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THER80P - APN 225-152-O1, 02, 03r 04r AND
1B
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk; read the title of Ordinance No. 401.
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, 9eeoRtled by Brown to waive full reading of
ordinance No. 401 and set second reading for November 1, 1989. Motion carried
unarimously, 5-0.
F3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE AN O AG E NT 89-03 -HLACICMON HOMES
INCORPORATED - A request t0 appYOVe 6A annexation dgraeme nt (CO 89-150) for
development and annexation of approximately 25 acres located on the northeast
corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN 225-152 -01, 02, 03, 04 and 18.
(Continued fine Septasrber 20, 1989)
RESOLUTION NO. 89-3'15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO
CL'CAMONGA, CALIFORNZA, APPROVING SNVI ROI7MENTAL ASSESSMENT ANC
ANNEXATION AGREEMBNT 89-03 (HOMESTEAD LAND DEVELOPMENT), FOR
DBVSLOPMSNT AND ANNB7IATION OP APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT
LAND LOCATED AT THE NOATNEABT CORNBR OF NIGHLAND AND ROCHESTRR
AVENUES ANO HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-
01, 02, 03, 04, AND 18
MOTION: Moved Dy Brown, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 89-
3'15. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F6. CONSIDE T O O. D 30 LOC ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
ALMOND STREET. NEST OF $A?PHIAE STREET - Coneiderat ion of approval of Amending
Map within a seismic spacial studies zone, to adjust lot lines to accommodate
special setbacks requiremenie pursuant to final geological study, submitted by
Nordic Development Company. (COatiaued froe eepteeher 20, 1989) Staff report
presented by SOe Stofa, Associate Civll Sngineei.
Mayor Stout openetl the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
City Council Hinutee
October 16, 1989
Pays 11
ABSOLUTION NO. 89-491
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TM6 CITY OP RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMFROVEl~NT SECURITY AND AMENDING MAP TRACT NO. 10210, LOCATED
ON THE NORTH SIDE OP ALMOND STREET, WEST OF SAPPHIRE STREET
IN THE HILLS IDS RESIDENTIAL AREA
MOTION: Roved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 89-
491. Motion CaYYied unanimously, 5-0.
~ e e• e r
F'S. REPR G 50 7 4 00 F X P O MMU TY DEVELO N
BLOCR GRANT FUNDS TO THE AVENIDA VEJAA STREET IMPROV&MENTS PROJECT Staff report
presented by Niki Brett, Associate Planner.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no reeponse, the
public hearing was closed.
RESOLVTION NO. 89-492
A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMMING $50,784.00 FROM
UNEXPENDED PRIOR YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9LGCX GRA:7T FUNDE
TO THE AVENIDA VEJAA STAEBT IMPAOVBFdNTS PROJECT
MOTION: Roved bV Brown, seconded by AlexandeY to aDDYOVe Resolution No. 89-
492. Motion carried unanimous ly, 5-0.
• • • • • w
O. PUBLIC 86ARINGB
G1. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND CHAPTER 2.28 OF TM6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MVNICIPAL CODE
DISSOLVING TH ADV S MMIS ION ANO C ATI O IN ITB PLACE A CI IT 'LENS
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMI99ION 9tnff report presented by Diane O'Nea 1,
Administrative Analyst.
.lack Lam, City Manager, elated this Ordinance compliments a previous decision
by Council.
Mayor stout opened the meeting for public hearing. The:c bcing nc za~penae, the
pu6l is hearing was closed.
City Council Mlnutee
OctobeY 18, 1989
Page 12
ORDINANCE NO. 307-A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPOHNIA, AMEND ING CHAPTER 2.28 OP THE RANCHO
CUv'ANONGA MUNICIPAL COD$ DISSOLVING THfi ADVISORY COMMISSION
AND CREATING IN ITS PLACE A CITIZENS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
Debra J. Adage, city Clerk, read the title of Ordinance 307-A.
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded Dy Brown to waive full reading of
Ordinance No. 307-A and set second reading for November 1, 1989. Motion carried
unanimously, 5-0.
s • R + " .
C2. CONSIOERATTON OF AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 15 08.130 AND
ADDING SECTION 15 OB 135 TO TNB RANCHO CVCAMONGA HUNICI PAL CODE PERTAINING TO
RELNSPECTIONS AND REPEATED INSPECTIONS Staff report presented by Jerry Grant,
Building Official.
Councilman Buquet stated he felt things were moving in the right direction.
Councilwoman Brown felt the Ordinance would address the City Council's
frustrations regarding the "bad building".
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no reeponae, the
public hearing was closed.
Mayor Stout asked if this would go into effect inmediately, and would be
followed up with another ordinance with a first and second reading.
Andy Arczyneki, Deputy City Attorney, stated yes.
ORDINANCE NO. 403 (URGENCY)
AN ORDINANCB OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, C-LIPORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 35.08.130 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING SECTION 15.08.135
TO THE RANCHO CUCAHONGA HUNICI PAL CODE PERTAINING TO
REINSPECTIONS AND REPEATED INSPECTIONS AND DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOP
Debra J. Aname, pity Clerk, iaad the titre of Ordinance 403.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve Ordinance 403
(urgency). Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
• • . . ~
N. CITY NANAOEA'B BTAPP BEPORTB
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 13
N1. ONSIDEMT JN OP CA IT PR S E GIBLE T BE FUNDED FAOM LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 IN TH6 AMOUNT OF 5120.000.00 (COdtiaued fray October
6, 1989) Staff report presented by Jerry Pulwoodr Deputy City Hanager.
Mayor Stout asked where these funds come from and how they are earmarked for
certain purposes and cannot be used for anything else.
Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated that within District One, the
property owners within those boundaries (mainly we et of Haven) are assessed
approximately $28.00 annually. These dollars accumulate within the fund which
can only be need legally in District One. He further eiaCed that each year a
budget is set up and those dollars ere budgeted out and the property owners are
assessed. Ae ehoe¢ dollars come in, they era used for maintenance and
operations Eor water costa for parkways, etc. He also stated that a portion of
those dollars are allocated for capital improvemenCa within District One, and
therefore, it ie that portion of the budgetr the 5120,000.00, that is applicable
to capital proj ecte twat Se being considered.
Jack Lam, City Manager, also noted that this particular district, when it was
set up many years ago, was primarily for the purpose of maintenance, that it
was not set up as a capital dietricC.
Ruse Maguire, City Engineer, presented further information and maps.
Mayor stout opened the meeting fot puhlic input. There being no response, the
public input eeaeion was closed.
Councilman Alexander brought up the fact that the City Council had talked about
charging an increased aesesement to improve the appearance or ueuuauape
Maintenance District One. He stated he would like to know how the reaidente
feel about the increased co et,
Mayor Stout felt it would not 6e a good idea to start the capital projects since
there is the need to clean up the landscaping in th ie area.
Councilman Buquet et ated he agreed.
Councilwoman Brown et4ted-she agreed in philosophy, but felt this shoo ld 6e
handled the way the CDBG money ie handled. She stated she found it hard to
believe a trail Eence costa 542,000.00, ne ie propceed for Archibald.
Mayor St nut elated he felt what Councilwoman Brown was referring to should 6e
handled a[ hudget time. He further stated h0 did not know if the Council should
decide on the Eeneing on Archibald or how ii should be Funded. He feiL if Cha
reeitlente in that area wanted that fencing that badly, then pose ibly their
particular fee ehou ld be increased to pay for it, Ne felt that portion of
Archibald did not get that much traffic anyway ee compares to other parts of the
City.
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 14
Mayor Stout stated he felt the money ehoultl go to cap'.tal maintenance items, not
capital projects. He felt come examination should be done with respect to
their capital resources, but that this should be done during the budget time,
not at this particular tLoe ae far ae allocating the resources. As for
developing a different method of doing this, he fell it could be done on an
ongoiny Daeis, st artin9 now. He suggested the possibility of setting up sub-
dietricts.
Councilman Buquet stated he agreed with the sub-zones. He felt the funds should
be allocated to clean things up first, and to look for new funding sources
through the budget process.
Mayor Stout asked Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Manager, to bring back a report on
sub-zones stating if it ie workable.
Jerry Fu lwood, Deputy City Hanagerr stated he would do this.
ACTION: Mayor Stout suggested the following items be considered ae direction
to staff: 1) Come back with report on sub-zones; 2) Allocate $120,000.00
toward the prioritized list of capital maintenance projects; 3) Capital project
funding to be deferred and discussed at budget time; and 4) If residents in a
development wan[ to upgrade an area and are willing to pay for it, they can do
this at any time.
H2. CONSIDERATION OP A ONE YBA_ LEA MBNT ICO 88 155 AI Yi TH WOMEN S
INFORMATION AND RESOURCE CENTER YOR TH¢ CITY OWNED HOUSE LOCATED AT 111 NORTH
GROVE AVENUE. VPLAND CALIPORNTA 41786 - One Year lease agreement with the
women's Inforniation and Resource Center and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
provide crLe ie intervention information and referral e. Staff report presented
by Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst.
MOTION: Hovetl by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve CO 88-155-A. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
Or. Jan Wright of the Women's Information and Resource Center thanked the
City Council for 2}Rir support of their program.
R • . R . .
H3. CONSIDERATION OF ADVERTISING ax ULATIONS FOR AUTO SA_ S CENTERS
MOTION: Roved by Buquet, eecondad by Wright to receive and file report. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
R R • A t
H4. CONSIDERATION OP SUGGESTED N PARR IN THE VICTORIA VINEYARD 90UTH
DEVF.LOPMSNT Staff report presented by Bred Buller, City Planner.
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 15
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to approve the name of Ellena Park.
Hot ion carried unanimously, 5-0.
~ w • • • t
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
I1. D_SCUSSION OF PARR PLANNING IN THE VICIN-TY OF MILLIRNN AND_NANYAN Staff
report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager.
Mayor Stout asked if someone wanted to acquize and develop an acre of park land,
what would the co et De.
Jack Lam, City Manager, et ated the coat to develop would be at most the entire
cost of what it was to pu [chase the land.
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the Cit.. Council
were:
Mike Arab, Chairman of the Caryn Park and Recreation Committee, who et aced
there are no parka in their community, and suggested the location north
of Highland, east of Milliken and south of Vintage. He suggested the park
be called Caryn Park.
Joe Diiotio, The Caryr. Company-, stated he would like to see a park in this
area and would be willing to work with Joe Schultz, Community Services
Manager, on [hie.
There being no further response, the public input session was closed.
councilwoman Brown stated she concurred with etaf f's report, and for additional
information to come back to the Council at the beginning of next year.
Mayor Stout felt the Council should move forward with staff's recommendation.
Councilman Buquet also agreed with staff's recommendation and appreciated Mr.
DiIOrio'e willingneea to assist the City. He felt the CLty should be cautious
in designating a eLte.~
Councilwoman Brown suggested that the Park and Recreation Conmiseion look at the
floating park land.
Councilman Ru.gegt ceerurr¢d, and asked that Lha information come Dack at the
January 3, 1990 meeting.
ACTION: Report to com¢ bacx January 3, 1990.
I2. STATVS REPORT ON COMP STZON OP PVBLIC IMPROVE NTS. CAAYN PI,ANNBD
COMMUNITY PROJECT staff report presented by Ru ee Maguire, City Engineer.
City Council Minutes
October 18, 1989
Page 16
Councilwoman Brown stated she requested this be placed on the agenda because of
a rea itlent that was asking for more information on this.
ACTION: Report ieCeived end fil¢d.
• • • • ~
I3. RF.V IEW OF THE CITY'S BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE SOLICITATION SECTION
(TB IS ITEN HAS 88EN RBQUBSTED TO BB CONTINUED TO TBS NOVEMBER 1, 1989 !ffiETINO)
ACTION: item continued to November 1, 1989 meeting
Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:30 p.m. The meat ing reconvened et 9:50 p.m.
with all members of Council present.
I4. DISCUSSION OP GUASTS PARR PLANS POR RECOMMENDATION TO SAN BERNARD INO
COUNTY MEETING ON OCTOBER 25. 19&9 (Oral Report)
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to receive and file report.
Motion carried unanimously, 5-6.
IB. UPDATE REPORT ON NORDIC DEVELOPMENT (Orel Report)
Councilman Buquet stated they have had two meetings with the tes identa and still
have problems to be solved. He et ated some of the walk-throughe were stood up,
but that the developer did catch up the next day. Ne further et aced the next
meeting is echedu led for October 27, 1989.
CcunC llwoman Brown stated that they are working with Mr. Eeto on the problem=
and will continue to meet with him bi-weekly.
Councilman Buquet stated he would like to get copies of any paperwork to the
other Councilmembere fU!'their information.
Mayor Stout asked if the urgency ordinance approved tonight applied to tha
Sapphire Tract.
?ack Lam, City Manager, a±at sd it applies to evsrybedy.
Andy Arczynaki, Deputy City Attorney, stated it would apply.
Mayor Stout asked if this applies to previous reinepectione prior to th ie
ordinance being approved.
Andy Arczynaki, Deputy City Attorney, stated it does not apply to previous
re inepectlone.
City Council Minutes
October 10, 1909
Page 17
Counci lmembere august and Drown stated they woultl keep the council informed.
Mra. Huggins, from the audience, stated the residents appreciated Mr.
Grant's efforts along with JLo Martine.
ACTION: Report received end filed.
R R R R R R
I6. REPORT ON SNORING VEHICLES (Oral Report)
Ccuncilman 0uquet stated ha did not have all the material he needed for Chia,
but he would like Aancho Cucamonga to work up a plan through law enforcement
agencies to atop the problem with smoking vehicles and for this to be passed
along to other cities for adoption. He asked for a resolution to come back on
this at the November 1, 1909 meeting.
R R R R t R
J. IDBNTIlIGTION OT ITENS 1MR RRZT N66TIN6
There were none.
K. COgHINIGTIONS PRfNI TH6 PUBLIC
There were none.
R R R R R e
L• ADJOURNNBNT
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded 6y Brown to adjourn to Executive
sees ion to discuss personnel matters. Mot Son carried unantmcuely, 5-0. Meeting
adjourned at 10:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
Approvede
11 11 1 I
m ob om vend nooa ave..mme¢.. ¢ e m m a
:i:
d Nmry00rhmmJm N.~M wNmNTO•n.~T nmNia
\ x TirX•.p?~Imrvm im i~nm+r ti ~'X •NP aN
7~
P
n n
n n
n n
~
p ppp
Nml-mPO n~.ln a•n
•ii ii
XqX TTTTXI•`~A MTTwIMm
Ymmmmmesb00W00mo~0oOmeammmmmbmmmmOYOmpmmgppommpgqmmm
XhX nlm TT nT nT•~ITTnTIl mil pl wlT wlTn T/l q lrlmmmmmq mw~m MTMTMmnT mmgTilTX~
V I/1 1 I I 1 m p• qp! qq p• / /q
/
V V S
mSOiM
1G
OZNSN fT 2
p
p
n mWgWm O
nOTOMF ¢ ~
T
W S
V
VI 1 N
r
VnV
¢
6 \
2
P
JO Z
S
o on w
yw 2 SyV
~
i~ Y ~ Vn
¢
7w
f f
H~
2~ WVnU NO
jww
.u _
nSw2 wS~ •L2
o ~ u~ .~
iii ~~ .wiziaN d.
~iai.`..+~ nzwidz
"
a
a
r xzX- .
.
i
N
wu
<
~
~
u i. jib u 2 Sn
J
J
S~ nEdfFdNO
v~
~
.n J
wJZ27V2U
rc
ti
a n J
~
ui rt rc uZU ~Jd
nOSYZ/dSUZH•
S~emuVa Ya Yp•nrt6 Vmrvo Fm~/waSS d~nd Z¢771~
atV
o
¢ Nn yw
JT
n ~ ~ wf-[wi S? i
2n~
< u w
= w
;
2 J wi~u rCSd 4Xar na
LL Z/X-~, ~S.dJ 11t Sm SZ2
T
3 d FJ.
U'JU .nSU ¢
7+rcVE~
V
m
S
¢Jm O~S2/J ¢•~J
¢J7 J
Jr~V w]iw V
Y
JJ ~I ZJW TKO4 J~>¢r~~J¢')Jao
S¢
Xtn u O l m /a n 'f /m4 +~//1<////a//malmmum 9.9r JluJJJVVUJU
•~ i iNPnrlm iyw~n (n a•~1 r-nlm rl-N•I~~T ~e mef T•r~i
'
° ° -.mioT~-i
.1
.
a
.. .. -~ .. n r n .. .n.X T .... .... ~.... +,
I
q0
TLLO
X
M
X
Y
nZ~
\n•
\YmM
~e
nT•
nSn
NV~
IOW iI
nL
Mp
np0
XE
OraO gNONNmh~10 PO~MNOPOwmNNOOOVTO000000FN<onpOTOONOOPO
OHONOOMPPNOOOV m•rNnVVTwVImnnP<mNN~•n OOn.PVM
TH J .~ N N N N yP n.~NnN nrNm N V e
J ahpwonNm•nahpPO~rv T•NOMpPONN T•N pN pPONNTf Nah mP OnNTVNO
w•••INnnnNNnnnni00i«O.O<hhh Fnl-w F FP00pppO0emoPPPPPPw
yee00oppl=TTmTTTTTTTTTTTnwnTTTTTn nnIITTTnTTT w1I1TTTnTTT
O
p
p
n
OTTTTTTTTT'1w111TTTTTTTTTTTnTnn nTTTnTTTTnnTTTTTTTM
Tw
l l
i
N
J
m •LL • LL•P• p•
m
y
•o \
T
INJ O
• oY WO I
G
~ LL
~ O
~
t NO i p iP
i
N N N
N• 11"1 •
~2 : Oop
h
t • Ym 1
V WO
•N _
O N ~ Opi _
LL L nY zh~
m
34 W J ~+ JLSONU
FF
O
Y nw yWwJ i iwY •Ww Ni 4Y11mu O1PUOW
_ _ N
ua OF N FV
J Y
4LL
WiGCN MV 4V4 ~V
JS LLOONV lY
0 OJ ilwh J
03~ • i Y arl
1 WJ W Wm wZLLY Jh~VnOO
Z
~~ u
_
V
Y =
Jd
7 CV
C+ >O
P i
M
~
O Z2 ~
2J0
I
__
7 yZ>w tt
VFNrfM
i
u
P
O
w L+nP V OOgP<V P•Nh.~w nrvFn•.~N yrl y+lm V JamTNin P•~10 qHN L
m O•NmonN•ONNnPNgmNPaPwTanoPtinVOP OmwPNagnaVPPFn
•OONmO OBI 000nn1N wgNP J pTNTNMNNNT00
a
0 oem o..poermcereeae mennpmaopnpooN grmpppmeNm+rn
4 OOOrAppONOONnPrNNmmmmnneeNparmwmONVNmNronmrp+mrmw
P~i•
nJN nVm mrP
m
Nn
n
m
pm rv.a OPNm.Iw HmMO
inmbmPn
dlmnNNraammNMm
NN
+Jmru
ZY
~n
m+Nanmamrrvm+NanmaorNm+NanmaerNm+N.mn maorrvm+Nan
AN
Nmwim mmmmm w[m r++V++V
m+rrrmai+lo+++1+.I+VraYrlrlmorJ+m+rmmm+mlVrr+Jrrr•
mmmmgmmmm
mmmmmnmm[mm~Tmm[m mnmmmmmmmmmm m[rlm mAmmmm ml+lm mNl mmmm mwl wl mnm
•m! n • mfmm
U
u n w W f
y'
L W _
N a
V `O
¢ _ PI
W
3
Z \~WZ m ¢ p0
O
a
•
J
n
m
V
xL o1011 V~1
_ iiJ v
NOwO J w
v~~ 3N F
u2 IW w
Po On VVU V'OV
OINpON V
U V
m
_
_
_
v
RJ 23r Y1 J
N;o
13300E 13 wFC r~l i2 ~
r,.
N0
>JO7w \~¢ n7 ___
N
_
f'n r[
~NMw33
WIU M wiwV SZ~N~mv~W Nm
N
ti
V _ V'Uf wpNJ O11 LLV
>Zf imZrZOyWr ~0 n~naLV2NU<¢ZL
O
Ov~)u.10W e`I
FZLL
io°[ Y
n
wn
Zn¢
HJJ+'w ~ • o l l I vrniH iw24~+N
f
u
x NJVmr
RJVU _ FOVu
n
wx H ~o~i
Su3i26JN0J~upO 7i~wNZ2nr3i~wrt i[uowvw nlm Jmm
w ~f 7fGPOJwuJ6wwnf VJaw wf Tf'~u'•
ep
nN
oIn
<
N
w~LUL¢pRm¢mL4Z[[m VfVJ>)~iJWnf a~n¢Li¢URV
w
w
W»
u
~
., n
.... i
`o
¢
~
.
1
fit
nu ti
u
[[Ct
7~
')l
RJnr.JZ Jan
~:
emnfnNA¢
v
uSZLL ut O'~ni~i J>5N ~SYT.S JJw
_
f
T \
~+X'~ ¢IfJq ZUT[ 1 m?
+ i
V
•il r2uVUJ
3
rcF[[N aFTU31[VJU'mfl vuf nflT..fYOrJiS~U n[~22w6rJ010 w22 ¢'r uYp w.Ji
V f1_ 4~u iZ1f f¢ZruwJnU fffa¢nuw Yqf Z'y T'1n VUF'JJ 12C
i 2 SC1v0006u6i'~¢6uiaZrctt¢¢¢¢¢¢RN~N Nan Nan NN~~I./iNrr...r Env
m M1r [n N[nmV Pn V NaNmA 9P V PmO4NrvyNOONnYNNm m-~n SNJn n.~J
O NmnrrnmNSNmmmm-~PwVrrm m-[arvnm ^IA ~nm Pn NOmTJn
aaia~m
e~~q
pvon~m N.. ,...[ ~rmm..m. ¢n•
e
.. 3
i~~
u~
..
.;
ESE
;:
~:'::
:c:
x}'u
nFn
x01
nwx
~msae.a~a~a~
~~aa m.°.man.~.n
mJ~nOhYa
~I~I~~~I••~
mop]OmmmOmOO
'onmmmnnnnnnnm
i :!
io
J 4
>n>i¢w
r7
wJp
u~
S iJ lLLwu~
JJStZ nu=ip J¢
r~~<7F.~M~s
>~[LL )iin~ij¢Z
~n n
U H
rcy7
~IJIY
~[V
03'~
,S np~...Y ~O
E
w,
s
Wp
VY
I 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I IO01 1 e l l l l l l l l 1 1 I N
P a o P eoooeeeo ee o
i.w P e noeompee• e
+
a ~p AOTmwwT
B O O O O O P e
\n O O PwP •mPTPOFFn
w w N N NN N N N N N N N PNP Fnnnn Tn~n M+~ n
\n¢~ w w
p
F A n n n n n
n
n
n n n n n n /^Y
1 N n
o
n
n
n
n
n
N
n
^
^
n ^
n
n
Qn f
iy
a
• a f
e
f
f •fi
aaffaf Yl~ fY
i
M •f f
f
i
Y
•n"rvma
tl
N
N
e
••I
0<PPNmNN~T1
OhFwwNNNNN
IN NNNNNNmPe
in
ew•••
OOOOPOieOFhhFhnhFM1hoq mmlmmpeHmOmPmomplPwwn
n
NNmmmmFFFFF M1FFFhFFFFFFFFnFFFFFFhFM1FFnFFMFFFFFM1mme
NmTm TTTTM TmTTTnI1TTTmTTTmwITTT1iTTmTmmM mTAmmmm Tm
1 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1
2 P V
• P P N
a ~ F n
M ri n m m m m m T m m ~ Ihir T T T m T T T T
I
V
V P v V v V
" V V V" v
`Hm v v r v v V v v v V V V V v
~a V a' PP
P
`N 5 \\ \ u h
\\ 1\\ \\\\\\\\\
~
'^ R
V' Y
~ w P Pm
\ N P
PP Nw~
Pa
\
\ o
i m P P
P
TPPP
a u
P
P
~+ i
O O O (]00 Opp000O
F YwF F
OOO
O
p
n~ 0 o O n O ~]e o O p p O o e 000
p
CI
O 00 o u
y
u
V u u u V u u
uu uuJ u u uu u J
~/ J ~~ ~ U .i a
~~ p/t O OOOe PfJC~/`
r
w
/]i
7 i
~ r ~ a > s > T a > a i i } a>a fa~)YfiT> as ) ~
' S
z
~
i JJJ
i
i c%lyr w
F
_ _
2~~~i J
j
t ,.LL uu u.a ru i
_ _ t 7J
_
r1
i
x s my
uu
u ~.iauWWLL~
i
Y 7 2i
Y i d .'] r. n m 09 J l¢ 9 l rt> >6n pI~OLC>CG? ~N ~ n
• NTn r wNT••
m
m
P
til
wNNNNNw N d
T
y • • mn d
Opo OOOOeo000
n ^1 w w m 1•• •••Ii1•1• m N
~'
S
e oe o Nom«uonemmoemPOONmmnam
mo N i'on~°ooo+'~Nnnil°~'...Ieommoaeomoeea.Prvr.~oNNe
4 oP ~~brvm O~+ONPOPNNPOhmNaPmNNaonNrNOOmar
Ana Td1NF nlwnyMlY Nw omwnw~mn a.~nmNnN^raNmNn
Y ^~ 'n N V w .~ n
jl~ n
I~ ^yNanPOa.nn~mP O~P+n J N~phmPOnryn~ma~-m P0'IN mINaFmPOnr~n
.zw aoaaaanr h~.~-h.-h.-l-mmmmmmmmmea.PPPPPPPPPmooo
acw.'...NPmommmmmmmaommm~mmmm'memmooommom'm moooa m'mmmam mmmm
''onMm~nnmmn~nnn~..mnnnmmnnnmm~nnnnnmm~nmm~mm~nnnnnnnnnnn
V I>INI~ I IS ~ P Y
Jrw O ~U RV \ V r 4'
Yn Omt \N W N\ N 6 Y U\
x a Y ~JN • > >i
N In Z \w m N_ 6 P.VC J
~ av2v ivx n~ O ~ m:V OJ 2
'.nP v7 u LLWI i „OI ~N
i~ Y i hja n~
W J w.rt nV
rvC a ~ - ~~_ sU_9
rn
Z ~n 2 S~GwOZJ YNj
u uiw 4Z YOn ,[~4N V ~Jiu
~ rvOn ;P ~xQ JmSUa
.i F n.~ LL r; ~ o Nr PO v tiH
YL ri~ZPO ~.~~BCLL aUO wj +~a RZCO
. SV.'Z' C<U.JLLiZOS 1U P•nr K'~7 ¢•n.. ~.y.v tc
~. ~+S S~ Vaw 2.~~l~u vi.C n . OJ.~~J¢~.a =l~~-Jx>Jt)STa
i -i w.ut r~-~'Jrn n~iiu` ,2Z Y~1 uVJ ~n t.-awF
i~ c .~ u.~. T ~1'nu~='a~Vra/n~i'+uw scf SnmVfvl.rv /'~~i ~u ma.~ma.rc
a~~a~ J
L l r. n
J
i +i 1 r n~it~ ~-~.aaJ ~i fJi ~i ~
.]~.~ n: 1`[U
t~~ r„~J 11 a2w~
J ~ ~~
~Ji~" dirt-~~ '..a
c .. o xr o N.i ~ •J::uiii ~.'a m~ai~+f `+.J. i:oi:: ~,'I°~'*: _
.eiaa.'»~ara n..a emmman.n a.,.m m~~JJJV J.. i
no ~., o.. on N.n rvn.. onP On'm ~~+<.nmNr+.n x~
~`~~ N m M~aman.m~~TmmarvNM1 ±m n~ai4~~me..rT
~. HTnn
1,~ a l~ -. ~ n r ~ mti ~ n~ ..n.+-.
n .i
.~mao~e.m:omm~oom.~,r. mN~ma~rvmeeom am:eammmme
~:aa~~~::„;o~aaa~m~moma
„° o~nM~ar~~aaa~;mmmmrvrv;..as~mm-~ ~T_rv~A~oTo
m.~.~~maoT~mT~.a.mma.rvm;~ a~mae~rvm.
..~~,nN~
M~m~~m~n,T~~~m mmTmm~mTM~~m~~~°A mm~m~mm~mmmmmmmmMmm
N• •_~
~ • W
pjOH .\i . ~ V
JV J S~rVrv
~f~m
S ~ • I l J Oar
¢I
S ~~ 2 .n ~ ~nT ¢ ~
S li^ YY~
S~~~i ri .ln +~2WwY
,~o°z^ ~ - ez
z+~' `NS'~n.n.~`~.
.. _ _ _ rVrz~ a- r
> ~,i
.. ~J°
n'.'eL ~~~„~~i
~z i.`.~.` o ~~ z~ '_
Yf uin~(~(~~J
Stn»ny j.nyS r f
lnr])H'~il vuJ ~~y Jaa </a~i n~~.i.Vf u„~i Li'J
./.~J./l VI)~'~]},1Ot17.~~^~~~uV nLLwLL ~ui~VY J) T w~n.-.rn ~.~~lllllllK
imn..onm•na n~mm r..~mn,m+m as rrvvmao~Namm •,eo Jrv.~..NS a-...rro
~ma^tm nnmoN~~ a~-.,m.,nvNam.~m~+nNOMmy~-a.nNa.~rv.... em..~m.na a
^ N ~ yT.n^J nNw Om^o ~n N'+n .,y TMTw TTFm• wT.JT
n n
VX
O aOwINlPNOONONhPNONOM~ON O~OnONP~100e00~10•NOPr
e O~IONnOlONnNNpOl~reOee nl~POONPPpONOPOm
OONOOFN
;
/
PAO~N
10 NN Opf1Y Ow~ON OO tlP ONOOTPOI~P
O~MOge rynl^r m a NNII
N
nNYr
NOr
O V
O
P
a
N
P.
„m
r
rr
NO
r
\X¢X r N r a N r
N
XqX r r
~i
l i e
: gNaNlwoNNn.X Narewo..NnP nay-ePOrNn.rn
`
ooo°
n
z a
N~
nr-r-srX+PleemeomePwwawawPaweo opoo
NNwPPNenamaaaa
mnnnmm~°
P
n`
~n
l
°
n
°
l
''
!`
°
l
°
e
°
l
l
n.
..
m
n
n
nnwinrln
.
~~
nnnn
n
nmm~m
n
nn
nn
~
omnmP
n
n~..mnmi
o
..r
V J JrNZ f
!
w _ i
~
V
y
l 100 PMG ~ J! a
Z NMq M
mC
~
_ yN
N
rW NM T
M
t
m WI
J• W
in Zm JV
eJZ
O
m>W
WVSS
q
J
¢V
W~Zq
J
O
OS
>ZpN2UH~ H ONOV Jp
nTCw ZOrXX
O
w
i P w NN
~+SO02 ~6a 1-2f Ww wZ2iu
u
iZq~XinZVF= Z4ua at~w~
i
~
~' rxiwl.
__ __ r~9 wLOwJJ
U
2
~
r
mS H
nS w v
w ]P 032
f
.JJZ~N ZN¢¢iu
,
rrn n[
vnm ~~u¢X pau.r.~.+i...uui.uu OOnS?wsi ~t>ii Yi K.ui r[iZZn9.p v>
]
,y
" r
~
r:.
7E
ZI u ,
f i'- J4 n n
il ~
7J7J
Jn
V
V
ijSW
Y.uny
~
.u
~nn
i'~SN
v
_
.
j
r
rt
~i '>
y Y' N .n
an0 uN0 ^N`¢ )u x6r
Nea ZS ]u 2
>'u~J 7rtsl JN 7iX J
a OT.XV X
~
~f Y
M
na
u JJn nqa ¢
Jt Z
~
r 2
V
1
Z
O J~nge
H
u r
iJ SZ~J~
OZ U
prww r, w~n
x~=0 n>.X¢ 1.+2 JY~[~-1 a u~~w SSA[ 2~gxZSOJ000-IJ
Xtu U
lF
O.XOnF x`X~~v.]OiYY27
XO
,
Hr~70uJ
q
gq j
.XjJJJ
~qu
Y
JV
Zrnr M']!RI(a ~galq~
+aJJJJJJ J rircrirxxixzionnon qa nn a.acaaaaaaa~.nal:l x¢
mNl-P O NN r^
NmN
O
+NNPPar
lrN
o~r~~N NNOrONOOaama
Y
N
y
m
mm
TN'Z aVN^uPM• O Orn~In NNNlnanrelNN
^
n mn ~.On~m
mm~r~ +1 nr rrwiarq r^Im NN~y N9mrN1 .4 rm0
x /'X.
. X
NX X
NOPOCaaOTONNOTaONOrN000mO00paT0¢Orr+f Pm
oOTaN000NOOPYfmNawOFCNON O~IVOOOOFNOPOOrnOn
P~1u OO NP'O PNOOfv.Ih wmNNNnOmnPwPOOp ON„Nippf NPP N
~. ren TPmfm+aTaa+ P Nf mm
Twm Pm TTN a
nw • nr n OJf NNr m
a a m n N
6
JahpPOnrvmf NYw~NO~NTfN<n eppnrc mf NJh rTenN T•NpNmNOnN
XSX OOOrrnnrnwJrrNNVVNNNNNNTmmmmTm TmTal of ffffffN\IN
amaaamOm a'Omm°m'0amaa000amm°p°mmpmmieaeapme0o ae amamammmm
pmmmTnM~~TmmTmmTTTTTTTTm Mnm TTTTTTTTTTTTmmmTTTmmm
~Sn
F • i N
V VZw hJ J O V 1 Z
x o \ a
• Ki¢mNf fl YW I h
Y la O N NYY u
wzo o I-or
zue
P alma.Ni oym P ¢ W WNN la h
T. ~.'m SOSm
.~.~o~.~i%~w~n r r iii
~iN2.. err°~
¢w0 JpOr mF V
¢\O VV7~lw HOti3\u fZ~u 1
J¢ aY
NZp~ O\i~NrrNIO uY
N'JOJa ~O+Fa
hJn~[~OarIJVf Nn I~ rY\
FPSu
72i+ 220X-~+r r mAN II '.Irwv
WZSYOJ FVJOtlmNWFVV n~-r'9v ~Xi]L NN ¢YmZ>VNZ
AZ1 Yw
JS¢
rZiVn?NX-¢F
Z<Z 2+~ V _
Fn mi Ow Vfvi nt>t
O Diu li vi~~¢~m ~Y 4~~~v nnc.J JO~~..~JLT~aLaumiw uOJOOi~]~>a nta
~. .~.rn t ZfM
~z .JZ`
~.. ., i$ r
S Ltd ZS 0`Nnw
J?f
xiiei~ inz ~'~
n ~JJ~-fJLLY2e JJa %7Z
i2r- u9W J2w
wiz zxi ii:. nnoonva izz
z: .mz.m~ ~N ~~+N ~ nn~ninvn N.~N ~NNN +~~n..nn....»i> ii i~::~w~ ~~
NNTn. mNJmaNnmaaawoamPmNN..m
NaarvNmaNN.raao~-a
N : rnu.N.~.m.~:~: i=~mm.~.H.N.mr. m.°. maim memo oarN.a mm mm
n .. ANT mrT nm mrm rrn rm.. m
. ~~ ^
~°m5_::gB ~I 8: ~ ,I 0
Asa .>m msm
o 0
L'
G
I a ~
°Ri 1
3
~5 9 C . ,+ _ - ~ 8 ~I~
r
m ~..
~~..~
?S~ .,~ p ~a
`~`
b° - _ 8C
g kg •~_~
ge
~=P s ffi88°:SSiRB~; =G & _ Y R
r
~ga
o _^~rsSg ~l
_
~
A n -
~~ k
x.°~ mom..-..__ e
~2
R 5
dn~~:,~uT:~
" ~ +'~
' -~z
:.~ a saa ~
EE~Y•3
; _ e ~c
s
>E
CCLe£E~~S
~' _x
03
9 y
g a
•
„
~ ::cxss 'S
==BZ~
: T?y ~ Y~ ~ ~'
3 ~ >
k f
t
L y y
9 $Sy Y Y
~.~[
5~~~4
8
S
F
:£
(S~
'x a:
Y~g°
$E
Y
S~fi~C
=3ScY
YSF~'
C 9 ~ 8 .
_- :5
°^.~•
yfgs€
"°atE
1'yee°.
:€~r6
_`_~~',
4
F
C
u ~y
' ~ P
1~$
I i
/~
° ' &&BLSLSSB°&&SLY€BESLLiY58E€8 _i 8&8R&RS&
~g ~'~, =_-°vBS~--3.XF=-.R'S _S E_8_°269'R e~___a~-.°.^ 8>a8
8.x°.5:.
g ~, e_e_ ,.___eve=_ve~_____e=838e-od8ve£=8 888e
'~ .. mm~~,_.->omammaaasssa~R°=~~~P~:~~m~m£ m :mm~
}$~'~, $SiRSAB$$~F~.R AR~AICCZ"R ~A98~8,~,~~~RRR~R88 ~ 8,`^_~R
m
__ Fitl hM3888~R ~SS .4^~~F~RyR8~88888~8~~8RR~88St 8R~&
888=8RCa888888888888^8888888888588888 o8R8
s ~s~a~basames~$e8ve$ss5~a~asaas$~88a~o m ~sss
~, ~so=ses„ssgssssaPass~,~sssPSPs>assszRs a szss
~-
~~ 885='BS::s8R8R88888888=8888888888888885 m
m SRRR
St ..gym RRR^.~Sr:°8d8~8S~%R~~%ee8~~~~~88~8~8~8R S
88de
~+' at 888~so~~8::'°>&~SS88&&~s88aS6R 8ff8SsSa8a _
sS..:
8%~
we r
m
°x~
~
tl "' 88R=8r .e888888888888^888R8888E8S88888
~~
8
8S8
8S
8 m 8885
~ ~
8
~
Sr<
~$~~~~a~P~~~888~~e~808g88 m ~8~8
"~
- ~'~ 888rPa`.4°%~ZS8858R85ff,~~88Stb&8&8>SK&8S
.. ~. S SSZS
r m
i &BiSmB.mmS&8mE&&&Smw!&LS&tSSLS58mmiSm
& &S
&&
_
=
° _
s ', s
i -..
8e~voveve-- -_e e988 se_e o$8fi
yy V~ 9~~WU; ~Yi6 y~~
~
3R1
~
S
"~
~3
i
S
8 ~~ ~
S
~
~w
t
N.~_I
.^^.~~
8
~^^B
4~~
__u~
g
a
SR4
~ ~y M
N
°
^
g
g
^
'~l~
' :YI~S~~~~~~3 '~58
~3 ~'~~ ~~~^Y=10C
9 ..~C
#.
8
'-
sax-aeaaaA$s~~a-a~~~a
~$~I~'"~g~
ww~iae'~6~ = g_
~"6
_
_ a
Y E y 3
~~~ Wa~~aE~?S~~a~~§~~~$$~~~s~s~a~sk~~a ~a~$s
~~ ~ ?~~s$
-- - .xss_==_ss~=5~a?-'~3Rx;aarenar~~sa_ _ -
se
€ ~
Hg ', 8888885&G88&R888S8REY8S88ES8C88SC8tYYR88
- - -T3=er-°_~:e^°?SS-Eaemn}~.R_338eR£2=S^
g evoeooe__veove~6=eS-=^e=SoE-e=e~=.e=Ee6oo
^~:h^F~a^:a~.R°C-<aF'B~~Zs~:°:S~^n .^.rRR~~Sc K.°.. -
~ S~^F~'~-'^~~~~~~g~~R~~38R~~t'I~~S'R af~~~~~~~^. R88 ^a $
.3~ v..> :ms.e.::mo.mamm:e~mm m.,mmm:ma >e. ~ _
8~RR8AR~88~8~%~SR~Ry ~B~~$~F.~~Ra~m~~$%pR88
PP $
m
8888888888888888888888$%88$88888888888
'
s~~s~8~~8~~~see~sseagaggssaa~~~ee
s°aae
~ S gSSd&&~eSag>£C&SS8S8SS$S38fiS8S&S&SS>>°gtx°
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ..
8` g'. 8888888885888%8888$888R88S88888888888885 8 8
~~~ s~~~~~~asss~°ss°°s~~°s°a~°s~a~K~~~~s°ss°s~~~°s°s
s a$ °s °s
~a- ,
PPP_e_PassP~sss:.sssazssssasiesssc>aac~sa
sad
~ _ m
3e
=~ 888$88E8888888888888858888R8888888888
ssss
sa 8 8
g
~ ~g
o~~~€agg
~8~~~g~8~~~~~~g~~~8~~8~a # e
- R
'~ S~~b&8 S°8SSSs&&&858£8&S8s8S858SSCS&88&8&8 - S
_ $wl bm5mm'&IILSmm&&L~Ee°.8RSg3&ffi&E&&&ffi~ELS&&m&$
e o==oo~~--moo ~mSee~ve"-'Be~S^oS=Bme?^-^6SSee=e
' /. Y.C ~SY'8CN".Y1
& y~iQ~y=yVW ~'~~~~~~fsyY 3_=~5
S
%iC8 ~ Ilp
~ e
k~X...'.,Y~4
a 8~SS~YIW
8~~~~~~~~~~3~{~CYS6 Vu'"~r~ ~~
~ ~
_ a
~
~~
E
sPv
~:=
Ye~
a~~
~~a
S~
r
e __ m .^~R~ .. ~.°.F 3 s ~
!
8 ...
ue ., ~
GGS& 88a^ 8tY --
a
s-'S'~'~ _ ~ IIC ,'^.~_ g_3 as F
'- s$x~ _ a-- ~ agx~ ~ ¢ -
c~~~! ~~mm m i~ma ~
m O0"s 'a
P ~x°am "a m n
sa--
Q~ $$g~ ~Sg
P ~~~$
6 5
~ $
ma sssa 8 as c mar s
-~~ - sggg ~ _sg s c
~: -PPP eggs - sad s _a'_ a `s
W~'' ease a ease s ass s z2sa a s s
~i 8RS8 S 8888 8 Ra8 IC - R 8
_aa - gaga s zE ^£e"'S s ~
_ &~L° m4S& SSG
_ m6G
_ _ 3
v
''~, e~~e aaa'a s'as ese~ o P
~' ~~~~ ~ u e
~
~'~, ~
G ~~
~
~~ ~<~ a
~
~elP 65 d
'~ ~p *
3~~ ~ yy
~'
V~4~i qq
A ~
~~~ ~y
€ g
g
^5~~' ~ AW C1;'
Q y
~~, Y888 ~d ~`• MYCC S ECG ~ ~
fiY6 ~ ~~ d~
p
~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ i Y ~
~~~ EE
i~~~~ ~ gg ~~RR
~~8~$ 4a '8..'~8~ ~ ~~88~ ~ y
S~ ~~
~ 3
s
9
s
a
c
s
Y
~i
Y
~e
t
gig:
::
8
s
~'''
~~ ~i
~
~~~
~ a,
W
r
a~
?' ~
i ~„
g d a _
=~ ~ -' e _
- ~ .. ..,
~W,
~`;
~
~ i
~i ~
~~ -
Y
I
..
~1
Y y
A
IC ° It ,~
IC
- ~~.~ a8
~8 y
~ 8 88 &a 8
x R EE - . ci _ ~_y ~syy
~8 8S' 8 _ l8 iSF8 88 8 ~8 ~8 'i R A !8
~$ as= ~ a 3~ax~ $~ i ~$ ~~ ~ a a ~~
8 8°.Ca 8
48C RC$ 8 S 8
_ _m_ ..r8 € a s s a ..
_ mz°~_° mmzssz~ ms _
>-ass^BPa~g°s~#~ °a $g °sSfi~ a ~ ."a x
~ ~ ~
'~s ter.. ~~_ °s
s=`-'R="=-Wsa assay ~ ..
Se%~~~~~~~~~~ ~_~~~~~ Y y ~
g~kkokkk8gw~g YIY~~W~- Y k `_: Y
g V g Y ~ ~ Y
g G K C Y 4
ca4s~~'~~8~~~~~ a a~~~~~~~ m v`~ as }~~ "a ~s
F ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ s
~~
~ % &S RR 881 _
i
€ ~~ 8 __ - ~a ~$;
, ~ -
- na;
W 8 % ~ ~y
l~r.^ yy
~~
2 ~
~~I
°a
~
~ <
~~3~~
z
y
w ~I R
d
,
s- s -
n
i
3
~
~ _
.y,. ~ ~' tY Y Y
o
~ a
~~ ~ ~
g
^~ $
~~e
L
~i $~$$`
S
~ eg
o ve_e=
.~.M ~
~3L °1.
' R ~~~~
ha N e mm:o ~ .
.~'.~~
ek
3~
v ~ a
e ~~~
u=°_
~~~$ ~
+~ b
e
i y'
~
G~, ~ ~ ~ {
{
~S~Y
~ ~ 3 C
` V
4 ~
~ 5
~ Y
9 ~ 5
~
' d
~~ S ~ gg
~~8~ Y
; ~ 5
l ~ .? 6 ~ p' ~ ~ 2
/6
ma, nc n A winLiA lei il~ A 1JllAil_ A
STAFF REPORT ~~~ ~~.~
A
Y ~ Z
~~_ ~D
November 1, 1989 19__ ~
To: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager
From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager
By: Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator
Subject: Approval to Authoxiza the Advertising of the
"Notice Inviting Bids" for the West Beryl Park
Improvements to be funded Prom Park Development
Funds, Account *fo. 20-4532-8015 and Community
Block Grant.
C014SENDATIO
Zt is recommended that City Council approve plane and
specification for the West Beryl Park Improvements on
Carnelian Street at Highland Avenue, and approve the attached
Resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the
"Notice Inviting Bids".
Raf'Rt~SN1TA7n /71N1T.YRTR e
The West Beryl Park plans have been completed by Purkisa-Rose
and Associates for development of the Conceptual Plan
approved by City Council. (see exhibit)
The tan acre park will include two lighted soccer Yields,
picnic facilities Por group and individual use, a childrene
play area, a half court baeketbali court, send volleyball
court, restroom, parking for 95 cars and extensive
landscaping, and open-space areas. The concept was developed
in conjunction with a Community Task Force and represents the
communities desires for the facility.
Respectfully submitted:
Joe Schultz
Community Services Manngar
SS:DL:tp
Y
6
G Q
)E
¢M
Wr
mx
~. W
a "
W
I
Y
2
q
a
J
}
W
fD
F•
N
W
~~~ ~ ~
I/~ ~ ~ If
,,. ~, l .'S J i
_,~
,,,, . .
~~.
1g
RESOLUTION N0. 89 ~~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE "WEST BERYL PARK IMPROVEMENTS" ON CARNELIAN
AT HIGHLAND AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of *_he Ciiy of Rancho
Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans
and specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the plans and specifications
presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby
approved as the plans and specifications for "West Beryl Park
Improvements".
BE IT FURTHER SOLVED that the City Clerk is authorized
and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of
sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the
aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement
shall be substantially in the following words and Eigurea, to
wit:
^NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS ON PAOPOSALS^
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this
notice, NOTICE I8 HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the OPf ice of the City Clerk in the
offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of
2:00 p.m. on WEDNESDAY, November 22, 1989 sealed bids or
proposals for WEST BERYL PARK IMPROVEMENTS and WEST BERYL SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS in said City.
Bids will be opSRed and publicly read immediately in the
office of the City Clerk, 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730.
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance
wit.*. the previsions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7,
Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay
not leas than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for
work of a similar character in the locality in which the public
work is performed, and not leas than the general prevailing rata
of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. Sn that regard,
the Director oP the Department oP Industrial Relations of the
State of California is required to and has determined each
general prevailing rates of par diem wages. Copies of such
prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of
the City clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Baseline
Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and nre available to
any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also
shall cause a copy of such determinations to be poste$ at the job
//
Resolution No. 89-XXX
Page Two
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty tc the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, Twentyfive dollars ($25.00) for each laborer,
workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion
thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic Se paid leas than
the general prevailing rata o£ wages hereinbefore stipulated for
any work done under the attached contract, by hlm or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said
Labor Code.
In accordance with the provisions in Sections 1777.5 of the
Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in
accordance with the regulations oP the California Apprenticeship
Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the
prosecution of the work.
Attention ie directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of
apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.3, as amended, requires the contractor or
subcontractor employing tradesman in any apprentlceable
occupation tc apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest
the site of the public works project and which administers the
apprenticeship prcgram in hat trade for a certificate of
approval. The certificate will also Pix the ratio of apprentices
to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the
contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in sash cases
shall not be less than one to five except:
A. Wnen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint
apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15
percent in the 90 days prior to the request Por
certificate, or
S. When the number of apprentices in training in the area
exceeds a ration oP one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it ie replacing at least
1/30 of 14m- membership through apprenticeship training
on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence lhnt he employe
registered apprentices on all of his cantracte on an
annual average oP not less than one apprentice to eight
journeyman.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds
astabllshed for the administration of apprenticeship programs if
he employe registered apprentices or journeyman in any
apprenticenble trade on each contracts and if other Contractors
on the public works site era making such contributions.
Resolution No. 89-493
Page 2
The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (b26.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic
employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if scch laborer, workman,
or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages
hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the at Lathed contract, by him
or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said
Labor Code. ._
Ir. accordance with the provisions in Sections 1777.5 of the Labor
Code as amended by Chapter 9i 1, Statutes of 1939, and in acw rdancz with the
regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, property indentured
apprentices may be employed in the pros ecutior~ of the work.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6
of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor
or any subcontractor under him,
Section 1777.3, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor
employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint
apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and
which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to
journeymen that will be used in the perfo nuance of the contract. The ratio of
apprentices to journeymen fn such cases shall not be less than one to five
except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint
apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent
in the 90 days prior to the request far certificate, or
D, When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a
ration of one to five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of
its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual
basis statewide or locally, or
D, When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered
apprentices-en all of his to nt racts on an annual average of not
less than one apprentice to eight journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established
for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered
apprentices or .iourneymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if
other Centraciors on the public works site are makiny Sucii contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Resolution No. 89-x7IX
Page Three
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with
the requirements of Sections 1777.8 and 1777.6 in the employment
of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage
schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the
Director of Industrial Relations, ex-otlicio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division
of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours oP labor shall constitute a legal day's work
for all workman employed in the execution of this contract and
the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be governed by the laws of the States of California having to
do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter
1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended.
Tha Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, twantyfiva dollars ($25.00) for Hach laborer,
worl0aan, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract,
by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work
hereinbePore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said
laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and eubaistenca pay to each
workman Headed to execute ths work required by this contract as
such travel and eubsiatence payments are defined in the
8ppllcabifl collective bargaining agreements riles in accoraance
with Labor Code Section 1773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's
check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the Clty of
Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at heat ten percent
(108) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder
will enter into the proposed contract if the same ie awarded to
him, and in event oP failure to enter into such contract said
cash, cashier's cheolh certified check, or bond shall become the
property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awerda the contract to the
next lowest bidder, the amount of tho lowest bidder's security
shall ba applied by the City to the difference between the low
bid and the eaconfl ioweet bid, an6 the surplus, if any, shall be
returned to the lowest bidder.
~/
Resolution No. 89-X7IX
Pegs Four
The amcunt of the bond to be given to secure a faithful
performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred
percent (1004) of the contract price thereof, and an additional
bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (504) of the contract
price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of
claims for any material or supplies furnished Por the performance
oP the work contracted to ba done by the Contractor, or any work
or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also
ba required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation
insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under
contract which may be entered into between him and the said City
of Rancho Cucamonga Por the construction oP said work.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a
proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General
Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the
Contractor's Licanae Law (California Husiness and Professions
Code, Section 7000, et. seq.) and rules end regulations adopted
pursuant thereto at the time contract is awarded.
The work is to be done in accordance with the prof ilea,
plane, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file
in the OlPice o! the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the City Clerk
at 9320 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of
the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment o! $30.00 said
530.00 1s nonrefundable.
Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plane and
specification will be mailed when said request is accompanied by
payment stipulated above, together with an additional
nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost oP mailing
charges and overhead.
The successful bidfler will be required to enter into- a
contract satisfactory-to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the
General Provisions, ea wet Lorth in Plans and Specifications
regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the
Contractor's sole coat and expense, substitute authorized
aecuritiea in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca1iPornia, reaervea the right
to reject any and all bids.
as
Resolution No. 89-XXX
Page Five
Hy order o! the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Dated this day of ,
Publish Data:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra Adams, C ty Clerk
I, DEBRA ADAMS, CITY CLERK Of the City of Rancho CUCamOnga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution vas duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council o! the City o! Rancho
Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting o! said City Council
held on the day of , 1989.
Executed this day of , 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
Debra Adams, C ty Clerk
a3
nrmv nr.+ n e rrrun rr?r a arnnrr_ e
STAFF REPORT ~' ~9
~y
>, Yg~+ as
F'. ~+'UC '~?
- GL ~
Date: November 1, 1989 ~~__
To: Mayor, Members oP City Council and City Manager
From: Joe Schultz, Community services Manager
By: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator
Subject: Authorization to Seek Desicn Probosals For Don
Tiburcio Tapia Park
Recommendation:
City Council authorize the Community Services Department to
seek request for proposal for development of construction
plans and specifications for Don Tiburcio Tapia Park.
Background:
A ten-member cammittee of Rad Hill residents developed a
conceptual design for Don Tapia Pazk (formerly called
Creekaide Park). The committee's design for the park was
approved at the May 17, 1989 City Council meeting.
The committee requested consideration be granted for the
completion of sidewalks on Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista
Drives. The sidewalks would connect She nark to na saline
Road to the north and Vella Vista Elementary School to the
south as shown on Exhibit A. Thfs item was deferred by
Council with the request that estimated cost and potential
funding sources be provided Por the work.
The City~s Engineering Department developed an estimate oP
probable cost to provide the sidewalk improvements at plus or
minus $95,000.00. This information was reviewed by Council
at the June 21, 1989 Council meeting. Direction was given to
look into alternate ~8st saving methods to provide pedestrian
access through the area.
Due to department staffing changes and priority shifts to
finalize various park development projects, the project has
been placed on hold. To avoid any further delay tc the
prof act, it is recommended that City Council authorize the
Community services Department to seek proposal for
development of construction drawing for the pork. Ae part of
the proposal, the consultant will formulate various options
for the sidewalk. Those options will be presented to Council
for direction.
JS/DL/mq
Attachment
~~
EXHIBIT A
BAS E L I N E R O A D
A L A
UCAMONGA
CREEK
CHANNEL
ROPOSED
SIDEWALK
D:I >
C ~I
A
b/ ~~ESIDEWALK
" VALLE VISTA
~~ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
NORTH
~'~\a
,~:,:
~, ~
i,,i~I
i;s41
,f
~ ~~~~~a
~~
~~
~ ref]
n,mv nc n w e,nvn rrtn w vn~,n w sue
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ,
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Award the Milliken Avenue Median and Monument Improvement
Protect from 4th to 6th Street to Valley Crest Landscape
for the amount of (437,823.26, to be funded with
Beautification Funds Account Nos. 21-4647-8814 and
21-4647-8719 (FY 89-90)
RECODENDATIOM:
it fs recommended that the City Council accept alt bids as subeitted and
award the contract for Milliken Avenue Median Improvement Pra~ect from
4th to 6th Street and Milliken Avenue at 4th Street east side Entry
Monument to the lowest responsible bidder, Valley Crest Landscape, for
the amount of (437,823.26.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on
September 7, 1989, for the subiect Dro~ect. Ya114y Crest Landscape is
the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of 5437,823.26
(see attached bid sumaary). The Engineer's estimate was 5489,018.20.
Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in
accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required
background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements
of the bid documents.
Res y .~ ted,
r
:L8:s,1~ ~~
Attachment
cc: Purchasing
~~
R
4
a~
C
k
o
E
3
3
A
9 ~
n ~
8
s
~
~ k
~ 5
~ _
~ g
b
a
G
~
~ ~I
~
~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Novearber 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Reiect all bids for the Haven Avenue Median Iagrovenents,
Phase IY-A, without preJudice
RECp~E1OATI0N:
It 1s recaaaK:nded that City Council reJect all bids for the Haven Avenue
Median [agrove^ents, Phase IY-A, without pre~udlce.
Background/Analysis
Pursuant to previous council action on the subiect project bids were
received and opened. Further researcA into funding sources and into
coordination with adiacent developawmts have shown the need to postpone
the protect. Therefore, all bids should be rejected without prejudice
and the pro3ect will be considered to be rebid at a later date.
Resoe¢LfuNP sub~ettted,
~/~//~
RIN:MOL;d]Y~
~9
--- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE; November 1, 1989
T0: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director
BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Assistant
~;
-.,
SHBJECT: APPROVAL TO PROCURE COPIERS FDR THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TNROU6H
p 6-YEAR L E/PURL E
RECOIMEIIDATION: That a new Xerox 1090 and Xerox 1040 copier be procured by
the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department through a 5-year lease/purchase
plan.
BACKGROUND: In 1985 the Sheriff's Department acquired one of the first
production model Xerox 1090 copiers, financed through Hells Fargo Bank. This
copier has experienced considerable malfunctions resulting in numerous service
calls and a recommendation that this machine be replaced.
Xerox is willing to buy-out the current Nel is Fargo contract and we can
replace the existing Xerox 1090 machine with a new Xerox 1090 machine.
..AeA inr ihn Chnriii~c Da+rnl nnora+iDnc
build ing.•
ANALYSIS: The existing 1090 machine is inefficient not only due to down time
but because it does not have a finisher. Anew 1090 with a finishing device
will provide the means to speed copying and assembly of documents.
Additionally, because the 1090 has been in production fora period of time, it
now has many self-diagnostic features unavailable in the older machine.
Payments on the existing lease for the 1090 are E2.065.00 monthly, includ tng
the maintenance contract. 'Due to the availability of a favorable low interest
rate (3.9X) through Xerox, both new pieces of equipment could be acquired at a
cost of b1 ,839 monthly (including full service maintenance) which is a lesser
cost than that currently paid, E2,065 monthly, for the one 1090 machine.
Sufficient funds are available in the Sheriff Department fiscal year 1989/90
bu~;et. dve +n the nrinr mnnP.hiy amOwd. of E2,065.
Respectfully submitted,
~~A
Jim Hart
Administrative Services Director
0
nimv nc~ n n w:nun nrrn ~ z..rnw.n ~ .-
STAFF REPORT
Daie: November i, 1989
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Russel! H. Mayuire, City Engineer
By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
='.
Su b~ect: Approval to award and execute a Professional Services
Rgreement with Herman Kimmel and Associates in the
amount of 516,500.00 for preparation of traffic signal
plans for the in tersectipns of Spruce Avenue at Terra
Vista Parkway, Rrchi6ald Avenue at Eighth Street antl
Vineyard Avenue at Arrow Highway (upgrade).
RECOMMENDATIDN-
It is recommended that a contract he awarded to and a Professional
Services Agreement be executed with Herman Kimmel and Associates
of Newport Beach, Ca)ifornia for the preparation of traffic signal
plans for the intersections of Spruce Avenue at Terra Vista Park-
way, Archibaltl Avenue at Eighth Street and Vineyard Avenue at Arrow
Hrnhwav Iuonradel in the amount of 516.500.00. (f 15.000.00 plus 30%
contingency) to 6e funded from TDA, Article 8 funds in the follow-
ing amounts: account 12-9637-8918, f5,390.00q account 12-4637-8914,
55,390.OG; antl account 12-4637-8915, 55,720.00.
BACKSRDUND/ANALYSIS:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Pascal year 1989-90 in-
cludes the preparation of plans fcr and the construction of traffic
signals at the intersections of Spruce Rvenue at Terra Vista Park-
way and Archibald AClnue at Eighth Street. These new traffic sig-
nals will provitle atldetl safety at the intersections antl positive
right-of-way assignment. The CIP also provides for the modification
of the existing traffic signals at the intersection of Vineyard
Avenue at Arrow Highway to atld east and west bound left turn
phasiny as well as upg radinq the con troller assembly and other
appurtenances io current standards.
The Newport Beach consulting firm, Herman Kimmel and Associates,
were asked to prepare a proposal for the above described work as
they are a recognizetl and tlependable traffic signal design firm
with experience in Rancho Cucampnqa. Their proposal was reviewed
and judged to adequately address the issues antl requirements as
toltl to them.
31
CCSR
Re: Professional Services Rgreement
Traffic Signal Plan Preparation
November 1, 1989
Page 2
The fee estimate for each portion of the work was tletermined to be
in line with fees currently being offered for similar types of
work. They have supplietl the required Certificate of Insurance in
the amounts prescribed and have submitted the agreement as executetl
by them.
With the above in mind and Lhe fact that staff has personal
confidence in their ability antl desire to complete the protect in
a timely and professional manner, Herman Kimmel and Associates is
hereby recommended to receive the award of the project antl that the
Professional Services Agreement be executed.
Res ly,~ bmitted,
RHO .~
STAFF REPORT
- .,
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~"
:,
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civ11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting
at the intersections of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street and
Archibald and Lemon Avenues awarded to Hovey Electric for
the amount of f211,395.00 (f192,177.00 plus lOS
contingency) to be funded from SB 325 Fund Account
Nos. 12-4637-8911, and 12-637-8912, respectively (Awarded
September 20, 1989) FY 89/90
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract documents for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting
at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Seventh Street and Archibald and
Lemona Avenues and authorize the Administrative Services Director to
expend f211,395.00, (f192,177.00 plus l0i contingency) to De funded from
SB 325 Fund Account Nos. 12-4637-8911 and 12-4637-8912.
uacRyruunuj nna iysis
On September 20, 1989, City Council awarded Lhe sub,)ect project to Hovey
Electric. Staff has received the executed contract documents, bonds and
insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in
accordance with the contract proposal.
Resp 1 fitted,
R :LB:d1w
cc: purchasing
33
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Noveaber 1, 1989 L1(
T0: City Council and City Manager ~CJ~
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 for Sierra Madre
and Placida Court for construction of sidewalk on Placida
Court
RECONEIOATION:
It is recoawended that City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1
for Sierra Madre and Placida Court for construction of sidewalk on
Placida Court and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign saaw:.
Background/Analysis
As a result of petition frw the property owners of Piacida Court for
construction of sidewalk on Placida Court and previous Council action,
right-of-wqy has been acQuired froe said property owners and a
construction proposal received frow the contractor for said sidewalk.
Staff feels the contractor's proposal is slightly high; therefore we feel
that Tt will be necessary to Droceed on the sidewalk construction of
Force Account. Once the Change Order is approved and any necessary
reprograawling is caapleted, a purchase order, not to exceed f24,000.00,
will be cut.
Respec 1 Maitted,
~ ~ 7
R :IOL•
cc: Mikt Bratt
Larry Henderson
3~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA
STAFF REPaRT
CATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 1, 1989
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brad Buller, City Planner
C~MO'lf:
9
~ ,
a. ~>_
c
z
Fi ~ IZ
- a
195;
Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor
APPP.OVAL TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR CODE
ENFORCEMENT REPRESENTATIVE
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council
approve the renewal of Contract Services by Joe Torrez as
Code Enforcement Representative as amended for Fiscal Year
1989/:990.
ZI. BACKGROUND: Joe Torrez has been employed by the City on a
contract basis since 1945, During this time, he has been
involved with all aspects of the Code Enforcement Program
and proven to be a valuable resource. Except for his con-
tract emp'_oyment sCatus, Joe Torrez provides the same
service level and is considered no different than other
full time staff in the performance of his duties.
The current Agreement approved in Fiscal Year 1988/1989
includes provisions for an annual performance evaluation.
This was intended to provide an opportunity each year to
assess contract requirements, and make appropriate cost of
living or other salary adjustments. This evaluation
process was completed and necessitates a revised Contract
Agreement.
III. ANALYSIS: The attached Agreement is substantially the
same as for tll'e preceding fiscal year. The job definition
and description of duties is consistent with that of
regular full time Code Enforcement Officers. An eleven
(11$) salary increase hoe been included in response Lo
cost of living increases and a favorable job performance
evaluation.
ed,
CS ty ~F~'anner
Attachments: Agreement (CO 85-085 Amendment)
Exhibit "A" - Job Description
~s
AGREEMENT
(CO 85-085 AMENDMENT)
This Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day of November, 1989
between the CITY of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter
known as "CITY") and Mr. Joe Torrez (hereinafter known as "CONSULTANT").
A. Recitals,
(i) CITY has heretofore issued its intent to contract for
professional services with respect to code enforcement activities (hereinafter
referrred to as "services").
(ii) CONSULTANT has heretofore issued an intent to contract
with CITY for the performance of such services.
(iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform services
necessary to accomplish the duties of code enforcement activities.
(iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform
such services and is willing to perform such services as hereinafter defined.
NON, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT
as follows:
8. Agreement.
1. nefinirinn• The fnilnwinn AafT nifi nn <hxll annlu in fhn fnl lnw;nn
term, exce- pi-wi~the context of this Agreement othervrise requires:
(a) Services. The completion of those Code Enforcement requirements
described in x 1 1 ' hereto.
2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows:
(a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith perform the services in accordance
with Exhibit "A" hereto and all in accordance with Federal, State, and CITY
statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, ail to the reasonable
satisfaction of CITY.
(b) CONSULTANT shall be the sole person providing services in
accordance with this Agreement and shall not secure and hire any other persons
to comply with the terms of this Agreement.
3. CITY agrees as follows:
(a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of 518.80 per hour for the
performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost
of all staff time and all other direct and indirect casts or fees, including
the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment
to CONSULTANT, by CITY shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth
below.
/~`-'
Consultant Agreement
City of Rancho Cucamonga/Jce Torrez
Page 2
(b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with
the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices
shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by
CITY, All charges shall be in accordance with CONSULTANT'S proposal either
with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no
event, however, will said invoices exceed 95S of individual task totals
described in Exhibit "A".
(c) Additional services: Payments for additional services
requested, in writing, by CITY, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in
accordance with the fee schedule set forth in paragraph 3(a), above. Charges
for additional services shall be invoices on a monthly basis and shall be paid
by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY.
CONSULTANT shall not be paid for any services performed in excess of forty
(40) hours each work week unless such additional hours are requested by CITY
for additional services.
4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT:
(a) Information and assistance as set forth in
Exhibit "A" hereto.
(b) Such information as is generally available
from CITY files applicable to the service
requirements.
(c) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining
information from other a_nvPrnmental anPnriec
and/or private parties. However, it shall be
CONSULTANT'S responsibility to make alt
initial contacts with respect to the gathering
of such information.
5. O.mershlp of Docunx?nts. All documents, data, surveys, drawings, ramps,
photograpTs and repor s prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement
shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon pdynrent for services
performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall
be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT.
6. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the yylying
of a wr en o ce of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days
prior to date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this
Agreement 15 so terminated. CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT'S
applicable hourly rates as set forth in paragraph 3(a) above, or a pro-rata
basis with respect to the percentage of the project caapleted as of the date
of termination In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive maore than
the maximum specified in paragraph 3(a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY any and air documents, data, surveys, drawings, maps, photographs and
reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the date
of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.
3~
Consultant Agreement
City of Rancho Cucamonga/Joe Torrez
Page 3
7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands,
invoices a~wrT en comnun ca ons a ween the parties hereto shall be
addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals,
furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance
by the parties under this Agreement:
City Manager
Director of Community Development
City Planner
Deputy City Planner
Code Enforcement Supervisor
Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by
mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty-eight (46)
hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and
properly addressed as set forth above.
8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall not commence work under this AGreement
until i as o ained all insurance required hereunder in a company or
companies acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all
times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance:
(a) Workers' Compensation Insurance: Before beginning work,
CONSULTANT shalr-furn s~Eo CITY"a cerflTica~of insurance as proof that it
has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for said CONSULTANT in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code
Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to this
employee. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY
a certification as follows:
"I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code
which requires every employer to be insured against stability for workers'
compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions
of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the
performance of the worR"bf this Agreement."
(b) Before beginning work, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a
certificate of insurance as proof that it has secured and will maintain
through to term of this Agreement automobile 1ia6111ty and property damage
insurance Tn an amount not less than 5100,000 (one hundred thousand dollars)
tar CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT's business vehicle.
9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless
CITY, 1 s e ec a an appointed of ftcials, officers, agents and employees,
from all itabillty from loss, damage or injury to persons or property,
including the pAyment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys'
fees, in any manner arising out of or incidental to the performance by
CONSULTANT of this Agreement, including, but not 1lmited to, alt consequential
damages, to the maximum extent permitted by taw.
3g
Consultant Agreeaent
City of Rancho Cucamonga/Joe Torrez
Page 4
10. Assi rmw!nt: No assigrmw•nt of this Agreement or of any Dart or
obligation o per ormance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part,
by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT is
an indepen en con roc or un er this Agreement and shall not be construed for
any purpose to be an employee of CITY.
12. Governin Law: ThTs Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance w e aws of the State of California.
13. Attorney's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is instituted to
enforce any erne or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing part Tn said
legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees and casts from
the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reuonable.
14. Annual Evaluation: CONSULTANT shall be evaluated annually in writing
as to the per ormance an ulfTilment of contractual duties.
15. Entire A regiment: This Agreement supercedes any and all other
agreemen s, a er ora or in writing, between the parties with respect to the
sub,Tect matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representation by any party which 1s not eabodied herein nor any other
Agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be
valid and binding. ARY modification of this Agreement shall be effective only
if it Ts in writing signed by all parties.
IN WITNESS MNEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
.~~ uic uiy' di,.'~ jcY~ l i, iv aGL IU, L11 o'JUPo:
CONSULTANT CITY
Jce Torrez Uennts L. stout, Ngyor
ae ~. ae
ATTEST:
ra ams, e
ae
39
Consultant Agreement
City of Rancho Cucamonga/Jce Torrez
Page 5
EXHIBIT 'A'
CDDE EMFDRCEJEMT CDMSIILTANI
DEFINITION
To perform technical field and offtce investigative work in the enforcement of
various City codes and ordinances; process and issue related permits, notices,
reports and public hearing documents; provt de information regarding codes and
procedures to residents and businesses througA extensive public contact.
SUPERYISION RECEIYEO AND EXERCISED
General supervision 1s provided by the Code Enforcement Supervisor. No
supervision is exercised over other personnel.
REOUIREMENfS
Duties are required as follows:
Respond to requests and initiate field checks to identify possible violations
of a variety of City codes aM ordinances.
Investigate violations, contact responsible persons, and perform follow up
tnspettiens to ensure that reNdial action has been taken.
Keep detailed documentation of case activity.
rmm~nu wri Han ~n~n<e mwAww~. Lnnl._M wn 1 .. .wA W.
Research and compile lnforawtton and prepare written reports and statistical
data on a variety of topics.
issue Naming Notices and Motlces to Appear in Court.
Prepare code vlolatloe uses for prosecution Dy tM City Attorney and District
Attorney.
organic assigned field and offtce work to provide efficient handltny of
cittun complelntt.
Provide information ngwsted Dy tM publlt and City stiff in person and on
the telephone.
Learn and explain appropriate City codes and ordinances,
Undersgnd legai descriptions and boundary maps of real property.
%~
Consultant Agreesent
City of Rancho Cucaaamga/Joe Torrez
Page 6
Analyze and coepile technical inforaatt on on code investigations and
violations.
ApDiy invests gatlve techniques useful in ensuring coapllance with appropriate
codes and ordinances.
Establish and maintain effective working relationships and caawnications with
the public, other Lity personnel, and outside agencies.
Coaaaunicate clearly and concisely, orally and in writing.
Operate a coeputer terstlnal.
Operate a two-way radio.
Mork independently in the absence of supervision.
Possession of a valid California driver's license.
Certtflute of Coagletlon of a coursc in "Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure'
(P.C. 832).
~/
Consultant Agreement
City of Rancho Cucamonga/Jce Torrez
Page 7
LODE EIEORCEIENT COIrtRACT
I am aware of the provisions of Sectton 3700 of the Labor Code which
requires every employer to 6e Tnsured against liability for Morkers'
Compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the
provisdions of that Code, and I will comply wtth such provisions before
commencing the perforwmnce of the work of this Agreement.
Jce Torrez
(Date)
I~
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November I, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate C1v11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Jack R. and Janice E. Marcee, Sr. and the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga
for Street Improvements located along the north portion of the
Marcee parcel for the Nineteenth Street project from Archibald
Avenue to Haven Avenue.
IIEC01/ENMiIOM:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improveme~ between Jack R. and
Janice E. Marcee, Sr. and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga.
BNC1061t0U1D/AIYILTSIS:
The attached subject Agreement between the City and Jack R. and Jantce E.
Marcee, Sr. for street improvements wA1ch include cuvb and gutter
Installatton, street pavement and other related work, along the north portion
of the Marcee parcel. Mr. and Mn. Marcee have agreed to grant to the City a
Right-of-Nay Easement to al law for the installation of curb and gutter, streer
pavement and oxner relaxes worn In return ror the COrdtrUttlon oY satd
improvements.
Said street improvements will be constructed in conjuction with the City's
Nineteenth Street Project.
Respe submitted,
/ -
. am
Attachment
~3
RESOLUTION N0. ~ 1- ~Q~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION QF PUBLiC IMPROVEMENT FROM JACK R. AND
JANICE E. iMRCEE, SR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN SAME
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for Installation of public improvaeents along
Nineteenth Street; and
NHEREAS, installation of curb and gutter, street pavement and other
related cork, located along the north portion of the Marcee parcel shall be
made a part of the Nineteenth Street Protect; and
kNEREAS, Mr, and Mrs. Marcee, Sr. have agreed to dedicate the
necessary Right-of-Nay easement to the City for said improvements.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, Caltfornla, does accept sold Iaprovement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City
Clerk to record save in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, Caltfornla.
~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate C!vil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
John P. and Emw J. Amodt and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
Street improvements located along the north portion of the Amodt
parcel for the NlneteerKh Street project from Archbald Avenue to
Haven Avenue
RECDMENpATIOM•
It fs recomaended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between John D. and Eawa
J. pmodt and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BAUOiIDUMD/ANNLTSIS:
The attached sub3ect Agreement between the City and John P. and Emma J. Amodt
for street improvements which include curb and gutter installation, street
pavement and other related work, along the north portion of the Amodt
parcel. Mr. and Mrs. Amodt have agreed to grsnt to the City a Right-of-Nay
FAtpaent fn al lnv fnr }Iw inefal laH nn of n,rh and_ m~No etn~a~ ~ ..~_..~ 4.A
other related work 1n return for the construction of sald•tmprovements.
Said street improvements will be constructed 1n coniuction with the City's
Nineteenth Street Pro,~ect.
Respec bmltted,
RH :CB:
Attachment
/ v~
RESOLUTION N0. U ( ~~ / '~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION ~ PUBLIC INPROYEIENT FROM JOHN P. AND EMW1
J. AMDDT ANO AUTHORIZING THE IMYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN SALE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga bas
established requirements for Installation of public improvements along
Nineteenth Street; and
WHEREAS, Installation of curb and gutter, street pavement and other
related work, located along the north portion of the Amodt parcel shall be
made a part of the Nineteenth Street Protect; and
NHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Amodt have agreed to dedicate the necessary
Right-af-May easement to the City for said improvements.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the C1ty Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornta, does accept said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the C1ty Clerk to sign same, and directs the C1ty
Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardlne
County, California.
//
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~~_~
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer
SUDJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Carrie Candice Johnson Hall and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Hall
parcel for the Nineteenth Street project.
RECOMMEMDATIBM•
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improveaw!nt between Carrie Candice
Johnson Hall and the City of Raxho Cucaaonga.
The attached suDJect Agreement between the City and Carrie Candice Johnson
Hall for street improvements which include curb and gutter installation,
street pavement and other related work, along the north portion of the Nall
parcel. Carrie Candice Johnson Hall has agreed to grant to the City a Right-
of-Nay Easement to allow for the insta11at1on of curb and gutter, street
pavement and other related work 1n return for the construction of said
improvements.
Said street improvements will be constructed 1n conjuction with the City's
Nineteenth Street Project.
Respe l s bm ted,
~` r
RI M;,Nl1;S9.:pasrr
Attachment
7
RESOLUTION N0. ~ ( ` ~ I `f
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM CARRIE CANDI CE
JOHNSON HALL AND AUTHORIZING THE IMYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGH SAME
WHEREAS, the City Coundl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
establlsned requlrtraents for Installation of public improvements along
Nineteenth Street; and
WHEREAS, Installation of curb and gutter, street pavement and other
related Nork, located along the north portion of the Hall parcel shall be node
a part of the Nineteenth Street Protect; and
iOiEREAS, Carrie Candice Johnson Hall has agreed to dedicate the
necessary Right-of-May easement to the City for said Tmprevements.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to stgn same, and directs the City
Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~~
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engireer
BY: Henry Murakosht, Associate Civ11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Lawrence and Elvlra M. Ornelas and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga for
Street Improvements located along the north portion of the Ornelas
parcel for the Nineteenth Street protect fra~n Archibald Avenue to
Haven Avenue
RECOIIEMDATIOM•
It {s recommended that Ciq Counctt adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Pub11c Improvement between Lawrence and
Elvlra M. Ornelas and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACK6ROUID/AMNLrSIS•
The attached subject Agreement between Lhe City and Lawrence and Elvlra M.
Ornelas for street improvements which include curb and gutter installation,
street pavement and other related work, along the north portion of the Ornetas
parcel. Lawrence and Elvlra M. Ornelas have agreed t0 grant to the City a
R1aht-of-Nov Easement to allow fnr tha lnetaliatlnn of rurh anA nurror ,r..er
pavement and other related work in return for the construction of said
improvements.
Said street improvements will be constructed in con~uctlon with the City's
Nineteenth Street Project.
Respectf~ submitted,
R M:NM;CB•
Attachment
I
RESOLUTION N0. ~"( ~ /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM LANRENCE AND
ELVIRA M. ORNELAS AND AUTHORIZING THE M11YOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN SAME
NHEREAS, the City Councii of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for installation of public improvements along
Nineteenth Street; and
NHEREAS, installation of curb and gutter, street pavement and other
related work, located along the north portion of the Ornelas parcel shall be
made a part of the Nineteenth Street Project; and
NHEREAS, Lawrence and Elvlra M. Ornelas have agreed to dedicate the
necessary Right-of-May easement W the City for said improvements.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, CaU form a, does accept said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City
Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
So
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAirIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: C1ty Council and City Manager ~~~-•
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civ11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approvai of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
N1111am D. Angel and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street
Improvements located alongg the north portion of the Angel parcel for
the Nineteenth Street protect from Archibald Avenue to Have;, Avenue
It is recommended that C1ty Council adopt the attached Resoiution approving
the Agreement for installation of Pub11c Improvement between M1111am D. Angel
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACItfR0U1D/AWLL1'S I5:
The attached subiect Agreement between the C1ty and Nilliam D. Angei for
street improvements whtch tnclude curb and gutter lnstallatlon, street
pavement and other reiated work, along the north portion of the Angel
parcel. Mr. Angel has agreed to grant to the City a Right-of-May Easement to
allow for the installation of curb and gutter, street pavement and other
related work in return for the construction of said lmorovements.
Said street improvements w111 be constructed 1n coniuction with the C1ty's
Nineteenth Street Protect.
Respectfu submitted,
RN M:CB:naw~
Attachment
s~
RESOLUTION N0. ~g-~ T~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVElENT FROM NILLTAM 0. ANGEL
ANO AUTHORIZING THE IMYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
IIHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for installation of public improvements along
Nineteenth Street; and
NHEREAS, installation of curb and gutter, street pavement and other
related work, located along the north portion of the Angel parcel shall be
made a part of Lhe Nineteenth Street Protect; and
NNEREAS, Mr. N1111am D. Angel has agreed to dedicate the necessary
Right-of-Nay easement to the City for said improvements.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement;
authorizes the Mayor and the C1ty Clerk to sign same, and directs the C1ty
Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
S~-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~_~,
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Marcus B. Telada and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk
improvements located along the northern portion of the Telada parcel
for Lhe Sierra Madrc/Placida Court pro,~ect.
RECOMMEM011TIOM•
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between Marcus B. Telada
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACK9t0UM0lAWILYSIS:
The attached subject Agrcewent between the City and Marcus B. Telada provides
for sidewalk improvements which Include sidewalk installation and other
related work, along the northern portion of the Telada parcel. Mr. Telada has
agreed to Brent to the City a Sidewalk Easement to allow for the installation
of a sidewalk along Placida Court in return for the construction of said
improvements.
Said sidewalk Improvements will be constructed in con,~unctton with the City's
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project.
Respp~:t submitted,
//~
RHM:H
Attachment
53
RESOLUTION N0. ~ ` ~ ~ f 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT fOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM MARCUS 0. TELADA
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for construction of sidewalk improvements 1n
contunction with the Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect; and
WHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the northern portion of the Judge parcel shall be made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Telada has agreed to dedicate sidewalk easement to the
City for said improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs Lhe City
Clerk to record sable in the Office of Lhe County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
5`f
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~-~.r~
T0: City Council and City Manager ~-C.
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer
SlB,IECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Heriberto 0. Oliva and Rosie M. Oliva and the Ctty of Rancho
Cucamonga for sidewalk improvements Located along the northern
portion of the Oliva parcel for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court
protect.
^ECOMMEMOATI011•
it is reconwended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between Heriberto 0.
Oliva and Rosie M. Oliva and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACIf9lOUID/AWILTS [S
The attached subtett Agreement between the City and Heriberto 0. Oliva and
Rosie M. Oliva provides for sidewalk improvements which include sidewalk
installation and other related work, along the northern portion of the Oliva
parcel. Mr, and Mrs. Oliva have agreed to grant to the City a Sidewalk
Facnment to alinr fnr tM lnc tall ail nn of . <1ArralY al nno o1,r1 A. r,.u.~ t..
return for the construction of said improvements.
Said sidewalk improvements will be constructed in contunctton with the City's
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect.
Res submitted,
~-
Attachment
5S
RESaurloN No. ~9- .5 QC7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHC
CUCAlONGI1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALUTION OF PUBLIC IIVROYEIENi FROM HERIBERTO 0.
OLIYA AND ROSIE N. OLIYA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGH SAME
WHEREAS, the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirmaents for construction of sidewalk improvements in
conjunction with the Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
NHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the northern portion of the Oliva parcel. shall be made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Plad da Court Project; and
MIEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Oliva have agreed Lo dedicate sidewalk
easement to the City for Bald improvements.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Councll of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agretwent,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City
Clerk to record same in the Offi ee of the CourKy Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
~~°
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: November 1, 1989
T0: C7 ty Councll and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Assoctate Civ11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Pub11c Improvement between
Stanley C. Caburroc and Rose M. 6. Cabunoc and the C1ty of Rancho
Cucamonga for sidewalk improvements located along the southern
portion of the S. Cabunoc parcel for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court
project.
~ECOMIEIOATI011:
It is recommended that C1ty Councll adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public SmproveweM between Stanley C.
Cabunoc and Rose M. G. Cabunoc and the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga.
BAC106RpMD/AWLL1~S IS:
The attached subject Agreement between the City and Stanley C. Cabunoc and
Rose M. G. Cabunoc provides for sidewalk improvements which include sidewalk
installation an4 other related work, aiong the southern portion of the S.
Cabunoc parcel. Mr. and Mrs. 5. CabmMC have agreed to grant to the City a
Sldawalk Facement to allow for the 1ncUllati nn of a sl Aewalk al ona Pl aci da
Court 1n return for the construction of said improvements.
Sa1d sidewalk improvements will be constructed to conjunction with the City's
Sferra Madre/Placida Court Project.
(Respe bmitted,
1WM:NM. am a
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. ~-f'~ 5o I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAIbNGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOi!
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IlPROYEI£NT FROM STANLEY C.
CABUNOC AND ROSE M. 6. CABUNOC AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO SIGH SAME
NHEREAS, the Ctfy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
establi>hed rcqutreaents for construction of sidewalk improvements in
conjunction with the Sierra Madre/Pla~tda Court Project; and
NNEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the southern portion of the 5. Cabunoc parcel shall be made a part of
the STerra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
NHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. S. Cabunoc have agreed to dedicate sidewalk
easement to the City for said improvements.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ctty Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept Bald Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the Ctty Clerk La sign same, and directs the Ctty
Clerk to record saae 1n the Offiea of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
5~
GATE: November 1, 1989
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Pedro C. Caburac and Leonila C. Cabunoc and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for sidewalk improvements located along the southeastern
and southern portion of the P. Cabunoc parcel for the Sierra
Nadre/Placida Court protect.
R£CONEMpATIOM•
It is recoawended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Insta11at1on of Public Improvement between Pedro C. Cabunoc
and Leonlla C. Cabunoc and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BAC116ROUMD/AMALVSIS:
The attached subtect Agreement between the City and Pedro C. Cabunoc and
Leontla C. Caburoc provides for sidewalk improvements which include sidewalk
installation and other related work, along Lhe southeastern and southern
portion of the P. Cabunoc parcel. Mr. and Mrs. P. Cabunoc have agreed to
orant to the City a Sidewalk Easement to allow fnr LM Inc tall ati nn of ,
sidewalk along Placida Court in return for the construction of said
Improvements.
Said sidewalk Improvements will be constructed in contunctlon with the City's
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect.
Attachment
5~
RESIX.UTIgI N0. ~~. 5oc~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIN: CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAlgNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AtltEEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC I14ROVEMENi FROM DEDRO C. CABUNOC
AND LEONILA C. CABUNOC AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAFE
NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for construction of sidewalk improvements in
conjunction with the Sierra Nadre/Placida Court Project; and
HHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the southeastern and southern portion of the P. Cabunoc parcel shall be
made a part of the Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
NHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. P. Cabunoc have agreed to dedicate sidewalk
easement to the City for said Improvements.
NOM, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lhe City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City
Clerk to record same in Lhe Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
~71
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~-~:~(
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakosht, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Nary D. gsebedo and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk
improvements located along the southern portion of the Asebedo
parcel for Lhe Sierra Madre/Placida Court protect.
IIECONEIOATI011•
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improveae~ between Mary D. Asebedo
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACIt9lDIAID/AWLLYS IS:
The attached sub,~ect Agreement between the City and Mary D. AsebedD provides
for sidewalk lmprovemertts which lnciude sidewalk installation and other
related work, along the southern portion of the Asebedv parcel. Mrs. Asebedo
has agreed to grant W the Cttyy a Sidewalk Easement to allow for the
installation of a sidewalk along Piactda Court in return for the construction
of said improveaents.
Said sidewalk improvements will be constructed in conjunction with Lhe City's
Sierra Madre/Dlactda Court Proiect.
Respect 1 6mltted,
AH : pam
Attachment
~f
RESOLUTION N0. ~ I ~ -J ~3
A RESq.IRION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AOItEElENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMROVEI~ENT FROM WIRY D. ASEBEDO
AND AUTHORIZ IN6 THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
NHEREAS, the City Gouncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for construction of sidewalk improvements in
cordunction with the Sierra Madre/Plactda Court Prolect; and
NHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the southern portion of the Asebedo parcel shall be made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect; and
NHEREAS, Mrs. Asebedo has agreed to dedicate sidewalk easeaent to
the City for said improvements.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Ctty Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sage, and directs the City
Clerk to record same Tn the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernerdlrw
County, California.
W
DATE: November 1, 1989
CITY OF RADICHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
8Y: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Halter F. Gage, Jr. and Kathleen A. Gage and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for sidewalk improvements located along the southern
portion of the Gage parcel for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court
project.
~ECOMME10111'I011•
It 1s recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public ImprovemenK between Mal ter F. Gage,
Jr. and Kathleen A. Gage and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACI(6ROUED/AI W.15I5:
The attached subject Agreement between the City and Mal ter F. Gage, Jr. and
Kathleen A. Gage provides for sidewalk improvements which include sidewalk
installation and other related work, along the southern portion of the Gage
parcel. Mr. and Mrs. Gage have agreed to grant to the City a Sidewalk
Easement to allow for the lnsta11at1on of a sidewalk along Placlda Court in
return for the construction or Bata improvements.
Said sidewalk Improvements will he constructed in conjunction with the City's
Sierra Madre/Piacida Court Project.
Respe ubmttted,
i ' -.
t
M:HM:pam
Attachment
~3
aesauTlDN Ko. ~Q' SO~
A RESOLIRION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFQINIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC I4PROYEMENi FROM NALTER F. GAGE,
JR. AND KATHLEEN A. 611GE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requtrenients for construction of sidewalk improveaents in
conjunction with the Sierra MadrejPiacida Court Project; and
kHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the southern portion of the Gage parcel shall 6e made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
NHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Gage have agreed to dedicate sidewalk easement
to the City for said improvearents.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lhe City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does acttpt said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sane, and directs the City
Clerk to record sane 1n the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardlra
County, Califvrnia.
~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 a-~it
T0: City Council and City Manager '~C~-/
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Ins tallatlon of Public Improvement between
Gary D. BT rd and Sherri Lemond and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for
sidewalk improvements located along Lhe southern portion of the
Bird/Lemond parcel for the Sierra Madre/Placlda Court project.
RECDMIEkUATIDM:
It 1s recommended that C11zy Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between Gary D. Bird and
Sherri Lemond and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACI06RdMD/AWLLYS[S•
The attached subject Agreement between the City and Gary D. Bird and Sherrt
Lemond provides for sidewalk tmproveaents which include sidewalk installation
and other reiated work, along the southern portion of the Bird/Lemond
parcel. Mr. Bird and Miss Leaond have agreed to grant to the City a Sidewalk
Easement to allow for the installation of a sidewalk along Placida Court in
return for the construction of said improvements.
Said sidewalk improvements will be constructed 1n conjunction with the City's
Sierra Madre/Plactda Court Project.
Respe f submitted,
M:HM:
Attachment
W~
RESOLUTION N0. 8q' ~J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CItY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONCJI, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN A1~IEEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC [MPROVEIENf FROM GARY D. BIRD AND
SNERRI LEMOND ANO AUTHORIZING THE fNYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO SIGN SAME
iHEREAS, Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
establlsned requirements for construcilon of sidewalk improveaents to
conjunction with the Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
NHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the southern portion of the Btrd/Lmond parcel shall be made a part of
the Sierra Madre/Plactda Court Project; and
NHEREAS, Mr. Bird and Miss Lmond have agreed to Dedicate sidewalk
easement to the City for said lmprovments.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucmonga, California, does accept sold Improvement Agrement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign sme, and directs the City
Clerk to record sme in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardtrro
County, California.
r
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 ~_~-~'
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakosht, Associate C1vi1 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Pu611c improvement between
David J. Rogoff and the City of Rancho Cucannga for sidewalk
improvements located along the northern portion of the Rogoff parcel
for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court protect.
It is recommended that C1ty Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvaaer~t between David J. Rogoff
and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga.
B11CI®t01MD/AIpLYS IS
The attached subJect Agreement between the C1ty and David J. Rogoff provides
for sidewalk improveaents wAich include sidewalk installation and other
related work, along the northern portion of the Rogoff parcel. Mr. Rogoff has
agreed to grant to the City a Sidewalk Easement to allow for the lnstallatton
of a sidewalk along Placida Court in return for the construction of said
imnrnvamanft.
Said sidewalk improvements will be constructed in cordunction with the City's
Sierra Madre/Placlda Court Protect.
Re/spectfu submitted,
RN HM: pam'-
Attachment
RESOLUTION N0. ~ ( ~ ~~ `+'
A RESOLIRCON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCHO
CUCAlgNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOIL
INSTALLATION OF PUOLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM DAVID J. ROGAFF
AND AUTHOR iZ IN6 THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
41HER£AS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for construction of sidewalk improvements in
cordunction wtth the Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect; and
NHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the northern portion of the Rogoff parcel shall be made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect; and
NHEREAS, Mr. Rogoff has agreed to dedicate sidewalk easement to the
City for said lmproveaents.
NOM, THEREFdtE, BE IT RESOLVED, tMt the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept sold Improvaent Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City
Clerk to record same to the Office of Lhe CourKy Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
~g
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: November I, 1989
T0: City Councii and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshi, Associate C1vi1 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement between
Michael J. Judge and Nancealee A. Judge and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga far sidewalk improvements located along the northern
portion of the Judge parcel for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court
protect.
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Insta11at1on of Public Igproveaent between Michael J. Judge
and Nancealee A. Judge and the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga.
eAClosaaro~ANarsls•
The attached suWect Agreement between the City and Michael J. Judge and
Nancealee A. Judge provides for sidewalk improvements which Include stdexatk
installation and other reiated work, along the northern portion of the Judge
parcel. Mr. and Mrs. Judge have agreed Lo grant to the City a Sidewalk
Easement to allow for the gns tai lati nn of a c1Awa14 el nn~ ol.~t n. r..i,..* ~~
return for the construction of said lmproveaents.
Said sidewalk improvements will be constructed in coNunctton with the City's
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Protect.
Respectfu submitted,
Y ,
RHM:HM:pam
Attachment
~~
RESOLUTION N0. (~Q' .5~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC lMPROVElE NT FRON MICHAEL J. JUDGE
AND NANCEALEE A. JUDGE AND AUTH0RIZIN6 THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
MiEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requirements for construction of Sidewalk improvements in
conjunction with the Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
IIFIEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the northern portion of the Judge parcel shall be made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Placida Court Project; and
MiEREAS, Mr. and Mrs.JUdge have agreed to dedicate sidewalk easement
to the City for said improvements.
NON, THEREFOtE, 8E IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucaaonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City
Clerk to record same 1n the Office of the Cowlty Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
7b
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: November 1, 1989 ~+
T0: City Council and Ctty Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry MurakosM , Assactate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement for Installation of Pub11c improvement between
Stephen E. filer and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga for sidewalk
improvements located along the northern portion of the Filer parcel
for the Sierra Madre/Placida Court protect.
NE001/EN011TION:
It is recommended that C1ty Council adopt the attached Resolution approving
the Agreement for Installation of Pub11c ImprovemeiK between Stephen E. F11er
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACp6R01M0/AMALPSIS•
The attached subject Agreement between the City and Stephen E. Filer provides
for sidewalk improvements which include sidewalk imtallation and other
related work, along the northern portion of the Filer parcel. Mr. Filer has
agreed to grant to the Ctty a Sidewalk Easeaent to allow for the lmtaltatlon
of a sidewalk along Plactda Court to return for the construction of said
i xryr uvanenla.
Said sidewalk improvements will be comtructed in cror~unctlon with the City's
Sierra Madre/Pl aci da Court Prgiect.
Respect ubelt~~ted,~
Attachment
7/
RESOLUTION N0. ~ Q' So c~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tiff C[TY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEDTING AN AGREEMENT FOR
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FROM STEPHEN E. FILER
AND AUTHCRIZ IN6 THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAVE
NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
established requlreaents for rnrKtruction of sidewalk improvements in
conjunction with tix• Sierra MadrelPlactda Court Pro,{ect; and
NHEREAS, installation of a sidewalk and other related work, located
along the northern portion of the Judge parcel shall be made a part of the
Sierra Madre/Placida Court P%iect; and
MIEREAS. Mr. F11er has agreed to dedicate sidewalk easement to the
City for said Tmproveaents.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEO, that the C14y Council of Lhe City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improveaent Agreement,
authorizes the Mayor and the C1ty Cierk to sign sane, and directs the City
Clerk to record sane in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County, California.
7
- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA 'cc.
STRFF REPORT ~`~ ~~
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. MaguT re, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT; Authorization for the assignment of an Adult Crossing Guard at
the intersection of Vintage Drive and Sierra Crest Loop for
Caryn Elementary School. ~,
RECOMMENDATION:
[t is recommended that an Adult Crossing Guard be assigned to the school
crossing at the intersection of the Vintage Drive and Sierra Crest Loop for
Caryn Elementary School.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
In January of 1989, the Caryn Elementary School was opened to students,
although only the western half of Lhe Caryn Community was occupied. Staff
worked with the Principal on the traffic control needs for the School for
those conditions. At that time the intersection of Vintage Drive and
Sierra Crest Loop was stilt under construction and not appropriate for student
crossing, so an alternate location, Vintage Drive at Nillview Loop, which is
300' west of Vintage Drive and Sierra Crest Loop, was selected for a
alY
This year, with almost complete occupancy of the community, a crossing study
was conducted at both intersections. The results indicated Lhe two separate
locations did not meet the warrants far an adult crossing guard. However, if
the totals for the two locations were combined, a sufficient number of
students would be crossing Vintage Drive to 3ustify a guard. This situation
was discussed with Lhe Principal who concurred with the elimination of the
Hillvtew Loop at Vintage Drive crossing and directing ail students to
Vintage Drive and Sierra Crest Loop with a crossing guard.
The combined volumes indicated 32 students crossing Vintage Drive 1n possible
conflict with 484 vehicles in the morning hours and 60 students crossing
against 304 vehicles in the afternoon.
Respe ,y i led,
M:PAR:
cc: Clyde Boyd, Chairmm~
eubl is Safety Commiaeion
73
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Recommend approval to open escrow with Mary Phyllis Bonshire, et.
ai., for purchase of land at 12951 Base Line Road, to obtain the
right-of-way for the Base Line Road Nidening Protect between
Yictoria Park Lane and Interstate 15 for f74,750.00, plus escrow
costs of f5,000.C0 to be paid from Systems Fees Account No. 22-4637-
8730-4117 and authorize the City Engineer to execute all necessary
documents.
RECONEMDATION:
Recommend approval to open escrow with Mary Phyllis Bonshire, et. al., for
purchase of land at 12951 Base Line Road, to obtain the right-of-way for the
Base Line Road Nidening Protect between Yictoria Dark Lane and Interstate 15
for f74,750.00, plus escrow costs of f5,000.00 to be paid from Systems Fees
Account No. 22-4637-873U-4117 and authorize the Ctty Engineer W execute
escrow documents or. behalf of the City.
BACK6RO81N1/ANALYSIS:
The Engineering design Staff met with Mary Phyllis Bonshire to discuss the
forthcoming City protect to widen Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane
and Interstate 15.
It was mutually agreed that the City would purchase their property (land and
improvements) for a purchase price based on an appraisal prepared by an
independent appraisal consultant. Additional compensation is being requested
by the City Attorney of 1750.00 for negotiation expenses.
The mutually acceptable--result 1s the above racommmndatlon plus the City
absorbing normal closing costs.
Since the City Engineer, by Resolution, 1s authorized to accept the dedication
on behalf of the City, permission 1s sought hereby to also allow the City
Engineer to execute and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City.
Respect ~111~ muted,
RHM:JLM:pam '
7~
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: :like Olivier, Senior Civ11 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval to open escrow with Walter A. Floriant and Evelyn J.
Florian{ for purchase of a portion of land at 7767 Vineyard Avenue,
Rancho Cucamonga, to obtain right-of-way for the Cucamonga Storm
Drain (Phase I) Protect for f1,344.00, plus escrow costs of
f1,000.00 to be paid from Drainage Fund Account No. 23-4637-8847-
4603-4117, and authorize the City Engineer to execute and validate
escrow documents on behalf of the City.
REODMENDATIOW•
Approval to open escrow with Walter A. Florlani and Evelyn J. Floriant for
purchase of a portion of land at 7767 Yineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, to
obtain right-of-way for the Cucamonga Stone Drain (Phase I) Protect for
51,344.00, plus escrow costs of (1,000.00 to be paid from Drainage Fund
Account No. 23-4637-8847-4603-4117, and authorize the City Engineer to execute
and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City.
Ramco Consul Lana, our ri gnt-oi-way cons ul tent contracted for the Cucamonga
Storm Drain (Phase I) Protect, met with Walter A. Florlani and Evelyn J.
Florlani to discuss the forthcoming City protect to construct an underground
storm drain in Vineyard Avenue.
It was mutually agreed that the City could purchase a portion of their
property that will provide right-of-way far an underground stone drain at the
rear of the subtect property for a purchase price based on an appraisal
prepared by Ramco Consultants. The mutally acceptable result is the aMve
recommendation.
Since the City Engineer, by Resolution, 1s authorized to accept the dedication
on behalf of the City, pernrlssion is sought hereby to also allow the City
Engineer to execute and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City.
Respe~ i led,
~~.
RH
Attachaent
~~
EASEMENT DESCRIPTI011 F'uR
WATER A. FLORIANI AND EVEL~N J. r'~„RI~uI PROPERTY
APN 20a--097-20
AN IRRC U LARLV SHAPED PORTION, SUESEGUENT L'i DESCRIBED AS PARCEL
OF ,IiC FOLLOYJ L.., OCSJRIOEL PARC~~.
A PORTIOtJ OF LOT 6, SUBDIVISION "C', CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT, IN
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERIJA RD UJO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 21 Ur" tJ BPS, PAGE o7, iN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUIJTY, DESCRIBE(. AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLf CORIJER OF LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 0
DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE E.45TERLY SIDE OF VINEYARD
AVENUE, 320.37 FEET; THENCE EAST 268.3 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION
OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT
OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 26 FII tJUTES WEST 148.69 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 48 DEGREES 34 MIIJUTES EAST 10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47
DEGREES 26 MINUTES WEST '269.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
E%CEPT ItJG THEREFRGM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOU TIIERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE NORTH 0
DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY SIDE OF VINEYARD
AVENUE, 254.37 FEET; THENCE EAST 150 h6tl; (HENCE SUUIH ANU
PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID VINEYARD AVENUE, 50 FEET;
THENCE EAST TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE tORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 41
DEGREES 26 MINUTES WEST ALOtJG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
RIGHT OF WAY TO THE POINT OF OEGINNING.
~EF.EL L
BEGINNING AT A POINT-ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PARCEL DISTANT 74 FEET WESTERLY OF THE MOST EASTERLY
CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EASTERLY TO SAID EASTERLY CORNER;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE
PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 32
FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
7~
~~ ~
r~
Ifl
d;
AREA ~ 336 S.F.
APN ZOB-09/-ZO
on c. inr~
sua. 'c
Ma z//6~
77
C/IY OF RANCHO
fLOR/AN/ PROPERTY
APN 208-09/-ZD
EXH/B/ T
N I~,ye~of L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
BY:
November 1, 1989
City Council and City Manager
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
Mike 011 vier, Senior C1vi1 Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval to open escrow with Feliz B. Quesada and Victoria R.
Quesada for purchase of a portion of land at 7745 Vineyard Avenue,
Rancho Cucamonga, to obtain the right-of-way for the Cucamonga Storm
Drain (Phase I) Project for (8,784.00, plus escrow costs of
E1,000.00 to be paid from Drainage Fund Account No. 23-4637-8847-
4603-4117, and authorize the City Engineer to execute and validate
escrow documents ort behalf of Lhe City.
RECOMMEM011TIOM-
Approval to open escrow with Feliz B. Quesada and Victoria R. Quesada for
purchase of a portion of land at 7745 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, to
obtain the right-of-way for the Cucamonga Storm Drain (Phase I) Project for
(8.784.00, plus escrow costs of f1,000.00 to be paid from Drainage Fund
Account No. 23-4637-8847-4603-4117, and authorize the City Engineer to execute
and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City.
Ramco Consultants, our right-of-way consultant contracted for the Cucamonga
Storm Drain (Phase [) Project, met with Fei1z B. Quesada and Victoria R.
Quesada to discuss the forthcoming City protect to construct an underground
stone drain in Vineyard Avenue.
it was mutually agreed that the City could purchase a portion of their
property that will provide right-of-way for an underground stone drain at the
rear of the subject property for a purchase price based on an appraisal
prepared by Ramco Consultants. The mutally acceptable result is the above
reconwendatton. --
Since the City Engineer, by Resolution, 1s authorized to accept the dedication
on behalf of the City, permission is sought hereby to also allow the City
Engineer to execute and validate escrow documents on behalf of the City.
Respectf ~SUbmitted,
/ c
~~-
R
Attachment
7~
i. ,
~ '
1
~_
r
'~_
~.
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION FOR
FELIZ R, pUESADA AND VICTORIA R. OUESADA PROPERTY
APN 208-091-44
AN IRRF ;U LARLY SHAPED PORTION, SUBSEQUENTLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL
1, nF THE FOLLOWTN, DESCRiRED PARCEL:
A PORTION OF LOT 6, SUBDIVISION "C" CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT, IN
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiNO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN 800K 21 OF MAPS, PAGE 67, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, OESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, WHICH IS
NORTH 0 DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST, 320.37 FEET FROM THE MOST
SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAIG LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 12
MINUTES EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID l0T 6, 133.3 FEET;
THENCE EAST 385.49 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC
ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 27
NINUTES WEST ALONG THE SAID WESTERLY LINE OF RIGHT OF WAY, 177.79
FEET; THENCE WEST 268.3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED 'IO THE SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 3, 1963, IN
BOOK 5920, PAGE 427 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL 7~
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PARCEL DISTANT 10 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE MOST EASTERLY
CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EASTERLY TO SAID EASTERLY CORNER;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION
WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD
COMPANY RIGHT OF MAT, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL A•DISTANCE OF 14 FEET; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
H:88054EAS.DES
10
r„~w;,r~~. 7~
` r
!_ }
t
r
_ e
.~
~ ~1~, 1
~0~~~~ I
/ 'IT/ ~{
A.P. ti/. 208-oq/ -44
- - ' ~`Y'
GP~P
y~.
a~
- ~~
5 L / ~-1
iR ~ 3'
~~
~,a ~~~?
~ ~~. ¢~,.
~9?
A4Ei ;
Z/96 S. F.
R7R. LOT 6,
SUQ. "C "
MB 2I /!7
,¢.
/,.
4sb
M
f~ "'
r ~'
8
~ ~.
~sn
T1' OF R4iUCN0O0CAMQI/GA
Qt1E5A[)4 P~PERT7'
AP. N, 208-09/-44
ExHrerr
"A
N P.~. z of Z
;,v ~, _ a.s.q
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November i, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Phillip Yerbera, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF JASPER STREET - TENTATIVE TRACT N0.
- reques vaca a por ono asper ree oca
sou~i of Highland Avenue and west of Carnelian Street
approximately 13 feet wide and 130 feet long
RECOMEIOATigI:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering
the summary vacation of a portion of Jasper Street.
Background/Analysis
On December 9, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-215 and
approved Tentative Map No. 12820. The racation request for a portion of
Jasper Street was not included Tn said Resolution as the vacation was later
detenained necessary through the Plan Check process.
The subiect right-of-way vacation was on the Planning Commission's consent
agenda on October 25, 1989 to make the finding that the vacation conforms with
the General Plan.
Respec s ed,
:PV:
Attachment
~l
RESOLUTION N0. ~q- ~ 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMIAl1ILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
A PORTION OF JASPER STREET
NHEREAS, 6y Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and
Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucananga is authorized
to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter sore particularly
described; and
NHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a
portion of Jasper Street 1s unnecessary for present or prospective public
street purposes because 1t has been superseded by relocation.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Lhe City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby ma es s order vacating that Dortlon of Jasper Street on file in the
office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cuuaanga, which has been
further described in a legal description wMch is attached hereto, larked
Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: That frog and after the date the resolution is recorded,
said port o'T n ot~Jasper Street ~w longer constitutes a street or public utility
easement.
SECTION 3: That the L'1ty Cleric snail cause a tern nea copy or sm s
resolution i-o ~i recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California.
U~
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of Jasper Street as shown on Parcel Map 8785, in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as Der Plat
recorded in Book 92 of Parcel Maps, Pages 98 and 99, in the office of the
County Recorder of said County described as follows:
Beginning a~ Lhe centerline intersection of Highland Avenue and Jasper Street;
thence S 00 37' 51" E 360.55 feet along the Jasper Street centerline; thence
N 89° 22' 03" E 17.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N 00° 37°
57" N 130.47 feet; thence N 89° 36' 25" E 13.00 feet; thence S 00° 37' S7" E
130.06 feet; thence S 87° 47' 38' N 13.00 feet to the true point of beginning.
Attached hereto and made a part hereof 1s a sketch entitled Exhibit "B".
S3
DETA/L HEREON
?fo~ba¢o r[azur f~W'T of w.Y
N/GHL4N0 AYE.
_-~.
s
h~ ~
.h
~8 ~0
~
~ ~
.i~-
se~•o»e~w
' DETA/L
® -AREA BE/N6 [G4GOTED
Exf//Bi r B
/ACAT/ON OF A PO/PT/ON OF /ASPE~P STFr'EET
nrmv nc v w unvn nr rn w unwrn .
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map and Ordering the Mnexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance
District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 12121, located on the east
side of Rochester Avenue, north of the A.T. A S.F. Railroad
tracks, subAitted by The Fullax:r Caaryany
RECOMMEIDATION
It is recoaaRnded that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Parcel Map 12121 and ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3 and street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and
6, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause save to record.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Parcel Map 12121 was approved by the Planning Casalssion on April 26, 1989,
for the division of 1.78 acres into 3 parcels in the General Industrial Area
./I w.c ,uYaM iVI J~1G.rlfiir ~IY11, iN.a 1.CJ Vu Nlc ea]i ]I VQ ui
Rochester Avenue, north of the A.T. A S.F. Railroad tracts. taprovenents are
to be constructed at the time of building periwit issuance.
The Consent and Naiver to Annexation forty signed by the Developer is on file
in the City Clerk's office.
Respectf subwitted,
_~
Attachaknts
U~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONOII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL IMP NUMBER 12121
(TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP N0. 12121)
+IMEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nurber 12121. subritted by The Fullmer
Coapany and consisting of 3 parcels, located on Lhe east side of Rochester
Avenue, north of the A.T. 8 S.F. Railroad tracks, was approved by the Planning
Caerission of the City of Rancho Cucaronga on April 26, 1989; and
NHEREAS, Parcel Map Nurber 12121 is the final rap of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
NHEREAS, all of the requirerents established as prereQuislte to
approval of the final rap by the City Council of said City have now been net.
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIgNGA
HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map Nu~er 12121 6e and the sere is hereby
approved and the Li;y EngiMer is authorized to present sane to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
O 4~
RESOLUTION N0. ~ l _ ~ ' I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGJI, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE IWiNTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR
PARCEL MAP 12121
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has Drevfously foraW:d a special maintenance district pursuant W
the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972`, being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
MHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to
the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings t0 annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, all of the amens of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance D1sLricL Nave filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's 'Report".
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative bob hereby orders the annexation
of the prop~as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit 'B` attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all fuwre Droceedtngs of the Maintenance District,
including-E~levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
87
EXNe1T •A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6
4~
l
'
r
1
I N.C'FG /
rn r t
Ie
n ~+~
~ ~
~ . }
Q
~
''' '
I •
M i _ _
wa.'aYt zmar _ ^Cj /vnw• ~ ~
......
g
a
~
,
nT-rc r ~
y
y
I . ,~~~ ;
~, ~~ f`~
'~
2 "~
i ~
• R
.
~
~~
`
~ + / ~
i
W f rr --
.-_
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEA 1212 ~
E)DIIBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAME: Parcel Nap 12121
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: pcl 1 - 2.07 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 15.56 units
pct 2 -~ 1.92
pcl 3 - 3.79
7.78 acres
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Lapps to be Annexed
District No.
1 --- --- --- --- ---
5 --- --- --- --- ---
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DiSTRiCT
Tarf
District No. Street Nape Sq. ft.
3 --- ---
JM: 11/1/89
Ground Cover Trees
Sq. ft. Ea.
~~
-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
.r,~
GATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager ~
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer i
BY: Willie Valbuena, Er.3ineering Te,.h„ician ~~'
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, the Vacation o. a portion of Kinlock Avenue,
Improvement Agreemem, ix,,;rovement Security and Ordering the
Annexation to Landscape Nainlanance bistrict No. 1 and Street '~
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 11685,
located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue, 'i
submitted by James O'Brien I
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving
Parcel Map 11685, the Vacation of a portion of Kinlock Avenue, accepting the
subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said
map to record.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Parcel Map 11685, located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue and
c ii,y u Ji:iiiJ,i Jf Lu L> tl., tc opJ Kiel U1.1. %1Y tlllub I>Iluwll as Vaba LCYj ui IraC[
9337, in the Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning Coamission on
September 28, 1988, for the division of 0.585 acres into 3 parcels.
The Developer, James O'Brien, is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Band: f50,000.00
Labor and Material Bond; f25,000.00
Monumentatioa_ f 2,550.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater
District. The Consent and Natver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is
on file in the Cfty Clerk's office.
Respec~uNy`;tibmi tted,
sd
9d
RESOLUTION H0. ~Q - S ~ a-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~ THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCA.MONGl1, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11685,
IMPROVEMNT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND THE
VACATION OF KINLOCK AVENUE
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 11685, submitted by James O'Brien,
and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the south side of Devon Street at
Kinlock Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga on September 28, 1988; and
NHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 11685 is the final map of the division of
land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map;and
NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as Drerequisite to
approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met
by entry Into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement
Security by James O'Brien as developer.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreaaent
on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and
that said Parcel Map No. 11685 be and the setae 1s hereby approved and the City
Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for
recora.
/t'
RESOLUTION N0. xC~ _ ~ / 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR
PARCEL MAP 11685
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has Drevlously farmed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to
the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Nalntenance District; and
MHERE/S, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above rec1ta15 are alt true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation
of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including a evy of all asspssments, shall be appllcaDte to the territory
annexed hereunder.
~~
'A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
,~
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEA I I GBS
~;'~
EKNIBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAME: PARCEL MAP 11685
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 3 parcels N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 3 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Lamps to be Annexed
District No.
I --- -° --- --- ---
2 1 --- --- --- ---
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf Ground Cover Trees
Uistrict No. Street Name SC. ft. Sq. ft. Ea.
1 Kinlock Ave. --- --- 4
JM: 11/1/89
9~
CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
eY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval cf Map, improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract
13930, located on Nilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and
Amethyst Street, submitted by Wi nbrook Development, Inc.
RECOMEIOATION
It is recoamended that the City Council adapt the attached resolutions
approving Tract 13930, accepting the subiect agreement and security, ordering
the annexation to Landcape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City
Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Tract 13430, located on Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst
Street, in the Very Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning
Commission on January il, 1989, for the division of 15.72 acres into 23 lots.
The Developer, Minbrook Development, Inc., is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the
following total amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: =1,279,000,00
Labor and Material Bond: S 639,500.00
Monumentation: f 3,550.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water
District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer
fs on file in the City Clerk's office.
Resp ly itted,
RHM.NY:J •~~`~
nts
~~_
RESOLUTION N0. ~9 ' S ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYiNG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
1NPROYCMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 13930
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13930, conslstfng of 23 lots,
submitted by Ninbrook Development, tnc., Subdivider, located on Nilson Avenue,
between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street, has been submitted to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approvai by said City as provided in
the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the
requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Ma of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said
City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for
approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway
purposes the streets delineated thereon.
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCiL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said improvewent Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same
on behalf of said City and the City Clerk Ts
authorized to attest thereto; and
~. T`uut id;u Iiiyi u~iwie,i ;, mmlyr is a~i.ey iau na ywu
and sufficient, subiect to approval as to fora and
content thereof 6y the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
9~
RESOLUTION N0. ~4. ~ '
A RESOLUTION OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION of
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.
1 AND STREET LLGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND
2 FOR TRACT 13930
AHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucasanga,
California, has previously forw!ed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the tenas of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Dtvislon 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1, Street Lighung Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize Lhe annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
NNEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have Bled with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the proper as shown in Exhlblt 'A' and the work program areas as
described in Exhlblt 'B" attached Hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including a evy of all assessments, shall be applicable t0 the territory
annexed hereunder.
EXMeIT •A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MIAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
rac wAtN ~T
~ 8 ~'-'~--r 's
_ I
i r _~_.. _~ - ., ~ ~
~ i
- - ~ w Alt
p
• ~ _ ~
~ /
ff ~~ X~i~ 1r ~
I L ,. _ ~ i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
.~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 1~Q?~n
R
EIIHIBIT 'B•
PROJECT NAME: TRACT 13930
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 23 lots N0. Of ASSESS. UNIT: 23 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Laaps to be Annexed
District No. ;WO-- Pt~WD-27?a6D
1 --- 1S --- --- ---
2 12 --- --- --- ---
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf Ground Cover Trees
u is Ll'IlL ilU. JLrClL ~aaR ti. aq, it. ta_
1 Niison Avenue --- 21,130 71
I Layton St. --- --- 13
1 Hillside Cove --_ --- 24
1 Monarch Ct. --- --- 17
1 Hell~an Avenue --- --- 13
JAR: llili89
9~
---- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAJIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager -~
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician ~~,
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
for Tracts 13565-1 thru -4, located on the north side of ~
24th Street and east of Hardman Bullock Road, submitted by
Standard Pacific of Orange County
REC01/ENDATIOM ~
I
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
accepting the subject agreement and security, for Tracts 13565-1 thru -4, and
authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Tract Nos. 13565-1 thru 13565-4, located on the north side of 24th Street
between Hardman Bullock Road and San Sevatne Street was recorded uMer the
County and subsequently annexed to the City. As ail developments are annexed
Into the aDDraprlate landscaping and lighting districts at the time of final
approval by City Council, Tract Nos. 13565-1 thru 13565-4 have been annexed
t ntn Cf runt li~htin~ n,ai nfonanro nietrirf Mne 1 and 9 ner rtty rnunril
approval on September 20, 1989. The project was not annexed into Land
Maintenance DTstrict No. 7, because the details of the work program areas were
not complete at the time the tracts were going to Council.
The Developer, Standard pacific of Orange County, is submitting an agreement
and security to guarantee the construction of the landscape improvements 1n
the following amounts:
Faithful Perfornwnce Bond: f1,006,500.00
Labor and Material Bond: f 503,250.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
The Consent and Waiver tD Annexation form signed by the Deve'.oper is on file
to the City Clerk's office.
ResPe y%s fitted,
.~,~~
`i ~ l
"RH y
Attachments
/DO
RESOLUTION N0. ~~' S / W
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT,AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, fOR TRACT 13565-1
THRU 13565-4
NHEREAS, Tract No. 13565-I thru 13565-4, submitted by Standard
pacific of Orange County, Subdivider, located on the north side of 24th Street
and east of Hardman Bullock Road has been submitted to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City on September 20, 1989,
as provided to the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in
compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said Ctty; and
NHEREAS, to meet the requirements estaDitshed as prerequisite to
approval of Tract 13565-1 thru 13565-4, the Subdivider, Standard Pacific of
Orange County, has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for
approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient
Improvement Security, for Landscape purposes.
NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same
on behalf of Bald City and the City Clerk Ts
authorized to attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as goad
and sufficient, sub~eCt to approval as to form and
content thereof by the City Attorney;
/D/
RESOLUTION N0. ~C~_ ~ I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRlCT N0.
7 FOR TRACT 13565-1 THRU 13565-4
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously Ponied a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Hlghaays Code of Lhe State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 7, (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional
territory to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Maintenance 01str1ct; and
NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NON. THEREFORE. THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE r.iTY DF RAwrHO cucamnurs
HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described 1n Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of Lhe Maintenance District,
including a evy of atT assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
/~ 1
i !IT •~•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. '~
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
e ~
f
~ b ~
/0
/~ IS ~
2
/1 ~il 1/ 11 ~
~ /
/D IG 11
N ~ 13
/1
1r
/a ie /
f2 r
.d6 .!S I
~/ ~
A7 ~,ff~
~[NO
,.. ,/ MtauM
Q~ COMM7NI7y E4 UF5TR/AN TRAILS
® ur wwTw~+co ~R.~.t
~ ~.~aa~ rah
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~'iA
~' C01~NTY OR SAN BERNARDI
~ STATE OF CALIRORNIA
:~
TRACT 13565
I iX1lIT •A•
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 'j
STREET LIGHTING MANTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
~i
I
I
CITY OF RANCHO C~ICAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
_ ~ TRACT 13565
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IEGENO
® Nn~ari
CDp1MUNl7y EWUESTRiAN 'r2A1~
® GTY WNTYNEO AItAf
~ 1~~R •n1l\
'M
ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 'j
STREET LICaHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
l G N
Nt~~~M -
m COMMUSITY 64~E57RiFN fRAi45
® GTY M~NTYN[0 !1~!
ttttttl Rtt/R 'tw{~
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
~' C0~1NTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~ TRACT 13585
,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
r
E%MIBIT •B'
PROJECT NAME: Tract 13565-1 thru -4
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 132 d/u N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 132 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of Lawp s to be Annexed
District No. 58IX1l~500L TI,TRAr L7?.,00
1 --- 16 -- - --- ---
2 49 --- -- - --- ---
IJUiDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Turf Ground Corer Trees
D1strlct No. Street Nape Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea.
7 Mi1D Easea~ent 58,343 57,029 210
Perimeter 71.267 96.002 540
Alta Dena Court 11
gnnandale Court 37
Bradbury Ndy 32
San Marlno Nay 18
Clatremont Lane 29
Crescent Nqy 'S3
CoWna Place 32
Glendora Dr1ve ~ 18
Hastings Ranch Rd. 19
Ridgeline Place 45
San Dimas Lane 22
JM: 11/1/89
l~~
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 `~
T0: City Council and City Manager ~C•
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering Lhe Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. i and 6 for DR
88-43, located on the north side of Sharon Circle, east of
Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Garrison Management, Inc.
RECOMIENDATION
It is recawaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving DR 88-43, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nas. 1 and 6, and authorizing the MAyor and the City
Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
OR 88-43, located on the north side of Sharon Circle, east of Herarosa Avenue,
to the General Industrial Development District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial
SpectTtc Ylan, was approves oy cbe running bommission en riay 3G, iSoi.
The Developer, Garrison Management, inc., is submitting an agreement and
security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the
following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: (3,300,00
Labor and Material Bond: 51,650.00
Copies of the agreement~ad security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater
District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation fors signed by the Developer
is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respec tiy~sub tted,
~~
C .
RHM:NV:JM:~I--=
\_.....
Attachsents
~!~
RESDLUTION NO. ~~ ~ $ I~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROYEIENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REYIEN NO. E10-43
NHEREAS, the C1ty Councii of the City of Rancho Cucaaronga,
California, has for its consideration an Iaproverent Agreeaent executed on
November I, 1489, by Garrison Manageaent, Inc., as developer, for the
iaproveaent of public right-of-wady ad,~acent W the real property speclflcally
described thereto, and generally located on the rwrth side of Shoran Circle,
east of Heraosa Avenue; and
NHEREAS, the Installation of such iaprovea~ents, describe6 in said
Inprovenent Agreeax•nt and subject to the terws thereof, is to be done in
conJunction with the developaaent of said real property es referred to Planning
Cowaission, Develapaa?nt Review No. 88-43; and
NHEREAS, said Iaaproveawmt Agreeaw!nt is secured and accaopanted by
good and sufficient Iagrove~ent Security, which is identified 1n said
Iagrovement Agree~ent.
NON, THEREFORE, TIN: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANC110 CUCAMDNGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES that said Iayroveeient Agree~ent and sa/d Iaproveasnt Security
be and the saaae are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said tiproveaaent Agreeient on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga, and the
C1ty Clerk to attest thereto.
~o g
RESOLUTION N0. x9 - ~ /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL aF THE C[TY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE iMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND
STREET LIGMTIN6 WIINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 88-43
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously foraxd a special aaintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3, Street Lfghtiny Maintenance D15trict No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 6 (Deretnafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District"); and
IIHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to
the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Maintenance 0lstrict; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
fil'rg cf ui• C,~,irc: ~cpcrt".
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legtslatlve bogy hereby orders the annexation
of the proper as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as
described in Exhibit "B".attached hereto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including-f~Tevy of all assessabnts, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
~a9
EXIlIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAQRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B
sirE
a
_~...
:.~
~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DRBB-~ 3__
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EIDIIBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAME: DR 88-43
ND. Of D,U. OR ACREAGE: 1.78 acre N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 3.56 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
District No.
1
6
No. of Lamps to be Annexed
SHd1l-95DOLlF, W~-2T,'.i00
--- --- --- --- ---
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
VIiY11VY I~V• JN CC1 n
3 ---
Turf Ground Cover Trees
JM: 11/1/89
rTmv nr neNrun rTrrenan*rre ..rrr..;.,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November I, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician
~~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR
89-10, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th
Street, submitted by Genesis Reai Estate
RECOMIENDATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving DR 89-10, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the
annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. I and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City
Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
DR 89-10, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street,
in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Specific Plan,
.:os apprc:ad ty tha ..r.r. ry Cc-.ilia-, ,.c „~1~ 12, .:, .m t`c d;•: ca cf
4.6 acres into 1 lot.'
The Developer, Genesis Real Estate, is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: f164,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: f 82,000.00
Copies of the agreement ;tBd security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater
District. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer
is on file in the Ctty Clerk's office.
Res suyaiitted,
R / ~~
Attachments
~~~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~- •J~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ABREEMENT
ANO IlPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 89-10
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaiaonga,
California, has for its consideration an Irprovesent Agreeaent executed on
Novea>ber i, 1989, by Genesis Reai Estate as developer, for the iIDproveaunL of
public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and
6th Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such ta>pravearents, described in said
Ingroveaent Agreerent and subject to the terns thereof, 15 to be done in
conjunction with the developatent of said real property as referred to Planning
Coasi ssion, Devel oparent Review No. 89-10; and
WHEREAS, said Iaproveaknt Agreeaknt is secured and accaaganied by
good and suffident Iaproveaw:nt Security, which 1s identified in said
iayrovenent Agreeaent.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDN611,
HEREBY RESOLVES that said Iaproverent Agredaent and said I~proveax!nt Security
be and the saaw: are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Iagroveaw!nt Agreeawmt on behalf of the City of Ra~ho Cucaaanga, and the
City Clerk to attest thereto.
/t3
RESOLUTION N0. 7t9 ~ $ a l
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CEPTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND
STREET LlGHT1N6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR
DEVELOPMENT REYIEN 89-10
MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of Lhe State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District`); and
NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to
the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their
wrlcten consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filine of an Engineer's "Report".
NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this 1e91s1ative body hereby orders the annexation
of the proper y as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as
described 1n Exhibit "B" attached hercW to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of tha Maintenance Distrito,
including-the Tevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
/( 7
EXIrlIT •A•
ASSESSMENT DIA~iRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MOS. 1 AND 6
6TR. STREET
y''
PIRCEL x PERCR t , l
1 ~ I ^.
Tt' t ~ I -
I ,
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR 89-10
E101IBIT 'B'
PROJECT NAME: DR 89-10
N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 4.6 acre N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 9.2 units
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
1
6
No. of L s to be Mnexed
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
n,.~_i. u~
Y.
3 6th Street (median)
JM: 11/1/89
Turf
i i L.
Ground Cover
a4. i i.
5759
Trees
Ea.
34
/~
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Magaire, City Enytneer
BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspectoe-~'
~yz
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13748,
located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage
Drive, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sons, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the suDJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 13748 were approved by the City Council
on October 20, 1988, in the following amounts.
Infrastructure 8
Streets Storm Dra1n
Faithful Performance Bond: 5106,000.00 f2,093,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: f 53,000,00 =1,046,500.00
The developer, M.J. Brock and Sons, Inc., 1s requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available to the C1ty Clerk's Office.
Respectful bmltted,
~~ z~~
RMM:
Attachments
~~
M ~ frock 4 Sons, Inc
_. ..: r......a~ms
..
Uc[o ber 11, 1989
Ciey of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Attn: Steve Gilliland
Re: Tracts 13857 13858 and 13748
De ac Nr. CilLi la nd:
I wish to request that the Improvement Agreements for Tracts 13857,
13858 and 17748 6e extended for an additional period of 12 months. This
excen si on is necessary in order [o allow us time [o comp Lete [he
following items.
U Perimeter Landscaping. This is necessary because the City
tog rose nog Depa rcme nc was not aD le co provtae orock Homes wt [n cne
revised Milliken Avenue median landscape spec ica[ions unlit
approx ima[ely August 28, 1989. Consequently we ace in Che process
of plan checking the necessary landscape plans and nor able to
complete the installation of [he Landscaping.
2) Placement of [he final asphalt cap. Our normal practice is [o cap
[he steers after we have completed the construction of our houses in
order to leave a blemish free scree[ surface. Since we are in the
middle of our houoe construction proc sea t would like to postpone
[he in s[alla[ion of [he as pha Lt cap.
J) Construction of the 8aynan Street Bridge. At [his point in time we
are wa icing Eor approval by the Army Corp of Engineers. They have
told us to antic ipa to approval 6y October 31, 1989.
4) Street stgns, street Lights, sidewalk, and ocher remaining behind
curb impro vme n[s will be completed as [he houses are hull[ out.
/r8
I have enclosed to triplicate the required Improvement Agreement
Extension Form (signed and notarized) and the Eee of 5251.00 Eor each
tract. Please call iE you require any add icional information.
Sincerely
S v n Shepar
P oje ct Manager I
cc: Jason WheaCOn
DISK2/kdc0062
// /
RESOLUTION N0. ~R- 5 ~~-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13748
MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Californta, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November 1, 1989, by M.J. Brock and Sons as developer, far the
improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Milliken
Avenue and Vintage Drive; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and sub,~eCt to the terns thereof, is to be done in
con,iunction with the development of said Tract 13748; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
1n said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
~ ad
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13857,
iocated on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Yintage
Drive, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sons, Inc.
RECOIIEIDATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
M4y0r and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 13857 were approved by the City Council
on October 20, 1988, in the following amounts.
r'ci uiiul ie,iw uouue ouuu: i»,uuu.uG
Labor and Material Bond: 147,000.00
The developer, M.J. Brack and Sons, Inc., is reQuesting approval of a 12-month
extension an said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office.
Respe ~, ubm tied,
RHM:SMG:IY
Attachments
~/
M ; 8rxka Sens. IOc
__ ._ r. ....~<cwr.
,,....,., t: 1491
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Attn: Steve Gil Liland
Re: Tracts 13817 , L3858 and 13748
Dear Mr. Gilliland:
I wish [o request that the Improvement Agreements Ear Tracts 13857,
13858 and 17748 6e extended for an additional period of l2 months. This
extension is necessary in order to allow us time Co carp le to the
follow Lng items.
1) Pe rimecer La ndstaping. This is necessary because Che Cicy
Doe i,.c c. iae 0.pa::~a~.:: ....., .~... ,..~ p....:o< .,.o ...~,.
revised Milliken Avenue median Ala ndscape specications until
approximate Ly August 28, 1989. Consequently we are in the process
of plan checking the necessary landscape plans and not able to
complete [he insta lta[i on of the landscaping.
2) Placement of the final asphalt tap. Our normal prat[ite i5 to <ap
' she stasis afeer we have completed [he tonatruction of our houses in
order [o leave a blemish free scree[ surface. Since we are in the
middle of our hoyjp construction process I would like to postpone
the tnstallacion of [he asphalt cap.
3) Construt[LOn of Che BaynSn Scree[ Bridge. AC [his point in time ue
are wa t[ing for approval by the Army Corp of Engineers. They have
cold us co ant is ipa[e approval by October 31, 1969.
4) St rear signs, scree[ lights, sl dews lk, and ocher remaining behind
curb improvme ncs will be completed as the housea are bull[ out.
~~a
have enclosed in trip ticace the required Improvement Agreeme nc
Fx tension Form (signed and notarised) and the fee of 5251.00 for each
e ra cc. Please ca 11 if you require any addic TOnal inE ormacion.
Sincerely,
/ i
S ~n Shepar
P o~ece Manager
cu Sa son Wh ea [on
OISK2/kdc0062
~~3
RESOLUTION N0. ~9 - ,5 a
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13857
NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, bas far its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November i, 1989, by M.J. Brock and Sons Inc., as developer, for
the improvement of pubitc right-of-way ad,Iacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner
of Milliken Avenue; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and suD~ect to the ternis thereof, is to be done in
conJunctlon with the development of said Tract 13857; and
NNEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified
in said improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
(~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto~
+?.
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13858,
Located on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan
Street, submitted by M.J. Brock and Sons, Inc.
RECOMMEMOATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the atached resolution,
accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mdyor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 13858 were approved by the City Counctt
on October 20, 1988, 1n the following amounts.
Faithful Perforsunce Bond: 598,000.00
Labor and Material Bond: ,;49,000.00
The developer, M.J. Brock and Sons, Inc., is requesting approval of a 12-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectful lac ibmitted, _
:1 /'
AttacTx~n ss
"T 3rrcx fi Sons, inc
Oceobcr 11, 1989
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. aox 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91770
dcc n: Steve Gilliland
Re: Tra ccs IJ 857 U 858 and 13748
Oear Mr. Gill[La nd:
I wish to request [ha[ [he Improvement Agreements for Tracts 13857,
17858 and 13748 be extended for an additional period of 12 months. This
extension is necessary in order to allow us time to comp le ce the
following items.
li Perimeeer Landscaping. This is necessary because [he City
Engineering Oepa rcmen[ was not able [o provide Brotk Homes with [he
revised Mi Lliken Avenue median landscape spec ications until
approximaceLy August 28, 1989. Consequently we are in the process
of plan checking the necessary Landscape plans and not able to
compleee the installation of the landscaping.
2) Placement of Che final asphalt <ap. Our normal practice is to cap
[he steels aftec au. have completed the construction of our houses in
order to leave a blemish free st reec surface. Since ue are in Che
middle of our house construction prole ss I would like co postpone
the installation of the aspha Lc cap.
J) Construction of Che Baynan Street Bride. At this polo[ in [Lme we
are wa is ing for approvai by the Army carp of Engineers. They have
cold us co an[Ec ipa [e approval by October 3l, 1989.
4) Sc reec signs, scree[ lights, sidewalk, and other remaining behind
curb [mprovmencs will be completed as the houses are built out.
V +~'
I have enclosed in triplicaee the required Imp ro vemenc Agraemen[
Excens ion Form (signed and nova rixe d) and [he Eee of 5251.00 for each
tract. Please call if you require any add l[ional inf ormac ion.
Sinc erne ]j. ~
5 venR Shepar
P ojecc Manager
cu Jason Wheaton
OISK2/kdc0062
f P
RESOLUTION N0. ~9 _ ~a~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13858
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November 1, 1989, by N.J. Brock and Sons, [nc., as developer, for
the improvement of public right-of-wAy agiacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner
of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street; and
NHEREAS, the lnstallatlon of such improvements, described Tn said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the tenas thereof, is to be done in
con,~unction rith the development of said Tract 13858; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security De and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
~~~
nTTV l1Ti O A min tJn ni in A 11/11In
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspecto ~ ~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13442,
located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon
Nay, submitted by Baywood Nomes
RECOMMENDATION
It is recoanended that the City Councii adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,{ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Cterk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 13442 were approved by the City Council
on November 3, 1988, in the following amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: f612,000
Labor and Material Bond: 5306,000
The developer, Bpywood Homes, is reQUesting approval of a 12-month extension
on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension
are available 1n the City Clerk's Office.
Resp tted, ,
i ~~~
RHM.
AttachmRntS
1~~
I3i~~exxx~ ~c~eliryrnerit Group
;10 Nr~i7rort Qnter Dnrt. Suite 250..'Jar7rort Beath, Cali(omia 92e60 f7141 W 0.7251
October 24, 1989
Mr. Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
ATTENTION: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
Subject: REpUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AS REGARDS THE IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT fOR TRACT 13442, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Victoria
ommunt y
Dear Mr. Gilliland:
A Request is hereby made to Extend the Time of the IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR TRACT 13442 for a period of nine (9) months. Support/,iustiff coif on of
chic nPni1P<t ac rP7atPA to the SfhPAIIiP of 1111nrnVPll,PntC wnr4 ltamc
contained in the Agreement is:
Curb and gutter work is virtually complete with exception of two
spandrels and several radius infills.
Sidewalks, street lights and street signs are being installed in
conjunction with the final stages/items of work of our House
Construction which is scheduled to be substantially complete through.C
of 0's at the end of April 1990.
NOTE: All Production Nouse units will De complete by that point in
time; however,~we will commence construction of our
"buildout" house (i.e. the house which will go on the Model
Complex parking lot). The start of this "buildout" house
coincides with the completion of the Ra les effort which we
anticfpate will conclude at the mfdAle to end of April.
RdR of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, spandrels, street paving and the
like will proceed with the completion of the Production Housing and
while the "buildout" unit described above is under construction during
the month of May.
J3d
Mr. Monte Prescher, Public Horks Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
October 24, 1989
Page 2
• The final lift of street paving will folloa the completion of the RdR
work and is anticipated to occur during the first part of June 1990.
• Adjustments to manholes, cleanouts, valves, required striping,
barricade removals, any final correction work identified Dy
Inspectors, antl the like will occur during the middle to second half
of June 1990.
• He anticipate the remainder of June 1990 and July 1990 as a period far
final acceptance by both the City Inspection staff and the City
Council.
NOTE: For all categories of Improvement Hork Tasks, we have
allowed a prudent amount of time for unforseen work delays
that we envision could occur due to weather, manpower and/or
material unavailability, separation and protection of
homeowners, and the like.
Ne will continue to maintain the Securities as stipulated by the terms of
the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13442.
As requested, ! have enclosed three executed and notarized copies of the
Extension Form, together with a check in the amount of 5251.
Thank you far your consideration of this Request.
Sincerely,
l ~~
onald H~Landis
Project Manager
DN L:gp
cc: Bond FilelTract 13442
/31
RESOLUTION NO. ~9 - ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13442
MHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November I, 1989, by Bayroo6 Haines as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-ray adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located on the northrest corner of Victoria
Park Lane and Kenyon Nay; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conJunction rtth the development of said Tract 13442; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient improvement Security, rhlch Ts identified
1n said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said ImprovemenK Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension an behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thercW.
13 a-
--CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
f
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and C1ty Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Gity Engineer
BY: Steve M. G111iland, Public Norks Inspector ~'
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for~Parcel Map 9350,
located on the no,•theast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken
Avenue, submitted by The w111tam Lyon Company
RECOMMEibAT10M
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing Lhe
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Parcel Map 9350 were approved by the City
Council on October 20, 1988, in the following amounts.
Streets Stnn Drain Base Line
Faithful Performance Bond: ;38~I31 -f502;3I~ =bTb;I55-
Labor and Material Bond: 5192,566 5251,258 5308,078
The developer, The N1111am Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 6-month
extension an said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Res 1 ~mitted~
RHM iG:s
Attachments
~1~--/
%~~~1LLI:~~I L1'O\~~ip~nit~/
BSdO ARCHiBALD. SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONioA. CA 91730 171 d1 980-41dd
October 1989
Mr. Steve Gilliland
Pu61ic Works InspecCOr
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.U. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Reference: Expiration of Improvement Agreement for
Parcel Map 9350
Dear Steve:
Per our conversation of t0-3-89, ue hereby request an
extension of the above noted Improvement Agreement for a
period of six months. The work is 55% complete. Attached
as requested is the City Extension Agreement, execueed and
nocorized in [rioLicate with a check for E251.00.
Sincerely
A. /
Chri~~ Meissen urg
assistant Proje Manager
~~eESVe®
CI (Y CC RAM:irO fiifA,~iO ~,"
E~~IhEERING OIVI W
SION
1 ~' /
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
RESOLUTION N0. ~q' ~p`P
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL M11P 4350
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November 1, 1989, by The N1111an Lyon Company as developer, for
the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner
of Rase line Road and Milliken Avenue; aM
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n said
Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terns thereof, is to be done in
coniunctlon with the development of said Parcel Map 9350; and
NHEREAS, said hprovement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 15 identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s
hereby authorized to sign said Improvemknt Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
rnmv no o , •en„n n
STAFF REPORT -
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector~J ~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9897,
located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista
Parkway, submitted by Lewis Homes
RECOMIEIDATION
it 1s recomsended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk W sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Inryrovement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Parcel Map 9897 were approved by the City
Council on October :0, 1988, in the following amounts.
Faishrui reriormance uond: Si,uio,wJ
Labor and Material Bond: f 509,000
The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 3-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are
available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respec 1 fitted,
,~~~~'
R
Attachments
13~
Lewis Homes Management Corp.
I I56 North Mououin Avenue r P.O. Box 6701 Upland, Calilomia 91785
7 Nr985-0971 FAxI 7191981-9799 '
October 6, 1989
Mr. Monte Prescher
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Division
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Smprovement Agreement for Parcel Map 9897
Dear Monte:
In response to your letter of September 28, 1989 indicating that
the above referenced agreement is about to expire, we are hereby
requesting an extension.
We are still waiting for signal plans to be approved by the
Traffic Department, but expect to be able to complete all work
by the end of December, 1989. We feel that a Three (3) month
extension would be sufficient.
Enclosed is the Improvement Agreement Extension form completed
in triplicate and notarized, along with our check for $251.00
for the extension fee.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Donald ~Th pson
Project Manager
DMT:sd
X37
RESOLUTION NO. ~ l - sa-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9897
NHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November i, 1989, by Leris Hanes as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Church Street and
Terra Vista Parkway; and
NNEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described Sn said
improvement Agreement and subject to the terws thereof, is to be done in
con,{uncLion with the development of said Parcel Map 9897; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of RarKho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
f 3$
-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA j ~~.. u
STAFF REPORT
GATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspect~r a~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel
Map 11341, located on the northeast corner of Church Street and
Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Haines
RELONEIOATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subiect agreesent extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Parcel Map 11341 were approved by the City
Council on October 20, 1988, in the following amounts.
cr.we~~ ct,.... n..~q Tr~FF~r a,..,.i,
Faithful Perfonisnce Bond: 330'l,ODO - ?;ISO;11tN~"-
Labor and Material Bond: (151,000 f 90,000 S 55,000
The developer, Lewis Noses, 1s requesting approval of a 6-month extension on
said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreexnt Extension are
available 9n the City Clerk's Office.
RespeC ib telly
I~
.~.
Attachments
( ~/
Lewis Homes Management Corp. -
1156 tictth \iounuin Avenue / P.O, aox 670; upland, CaliPomia 91785
7;1,985-0971 FAX: 714/981-9799
October 6, 1989 .,.., ...~ ~.
Mr. Monte Prescher
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Engineering Division
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 11341
Dear Monte:
In response to your letter of September 28, 1989 indicating that
the above referenced agreement if about to expire, we are hereby
requesting an extension.
We expect to pave Milliken this month, and expect to complete
Church Street to orchard Avenve in December. The
Foothill/Milliken signal should be completed in January, 1990.
..~ ~~...~ ..,.u .. u Fyn WV~1..,, an..cl,a1V„ 10 OYlL1V1Cla4•
Enclosed is the Improvement Agreement Extension form completed
in triplicate and notarized, along with our check for $251.00
far the extension fee.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Do~ M. Tlltimpao~1
Project Manager
oMr:Ga
/~~
RESOLUTION N0. U~ - ~ag
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFatNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL iMP 11341
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November 1, 1989, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement
of public right-of-way ayiacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Church Street and
Milliken Avenue; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subJect to the tares thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Parcel Nap 11341; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Ra~ho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and Lhe Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Ra~rcho Cucamonga, and the City Cterk to attest thereto.
/ ~/
rr~rv nc n n w?run rr?r n nan~rr n
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectf~7~,
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12902,
located on the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Almond
Street, submitted by Nordic Noods lI
RECOMMEIDATION
It is recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subiect g0 day improvement agreement extension and security and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Tract 12902, located at the southwest corner of Nermosa Avenue and Almond
Street, is being developed by Nordic Woods II. The Improvement Agreement and
Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site
improvements were orlainally approved by City Council on February 4, 1988.
Construction Permits were subsequently issued for Lhe items that the developer
was conditioned tp construct. The expiration date of the Improvement
Agreement and all permits issued was February 3, 1989. At that time, the
developer requested an extension of 90 days to complete ail remaining
improvements. Staff recommended a 6 month extension. City Council granted
the 6 month extension. At this time, the Improvement Agreement and all
permits are once again expired and improvements remain incomplete. The
Developer has ignored all correspondence from City staff. Accordingly, staff
is holding occupancies pursuant to City Municipal Code 12.08.060. In
response, the developer has formally requested an additional extension of 90
days to complete the approximated 308 of remaining construct/on Items.
Resp f ,ly fitted,
/"
R :sum
Attachments
/`/~~
NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
October 23, 1989
Steve M. Gilliland
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
RE: Improvement Agreement for Tract 12902
Dear Mr. Gilliland:
Enclosed herewith you will find three originally executed
extension forms, along with our check in the sum of $251.00. We
have substantially completed the improvements we are obligated to
complete. We will need approximately 90 additional days in which
to complete the remaining improvements. Could you please be so
kind as to process an extension. Apparently, the lack of the
extension is holding up final sign offs on the houses that are
complete. i thought that we had sent in an extension request
form earlier, but apparently we had not.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at
987-8308 or 944-3866.
Sincerely,
NORDIC WOODS IZ, LTD.
By: NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Its G~~ene~~ra~~l!!~~Partner-
By: Harri J. Keto
Secretary
NJK:vi
Enclosures
CL~F[MONT. CA 91]11
i~3
RESOLUTION N0. ~ 1 - 5aq
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EMTENSION ANO IIAPRBVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12902
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has far its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November i, 1989, by Nordic Woods II as developer, for the
improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Hermosa
Avenue and Almond Street; and
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subJect to Lhe terms thereof, is to be done in
con,lunction with the 6evelopment of said Tract 12902; and
NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securify, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Securlfy be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
/~7
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto~
SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13367,
located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Hellman
Avenue and Amethyst Street, submitted by Quintessence
Development
RECOMIEMDATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction
of the public improvements for Tract 13367 were approved by the City Council
on November 17. 1988, in the followtna amounts.
Faithful Performance Bond: 1.298,819.00
Labor and Material Bond: (149,410.00
The developer, Quintessence Development, is requesting approval of a 4-month
extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement
Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Resp y tted,~
/~-~--`~
R SMG:s
Attachments
l
h.L~tx_r 11, 1989
rir.y of Rancho C\FCarav.~eta
P.n, °;x # 807
Fancho '":camonda, Ca. 91730
Re: Expiration oP Improvement agreement PoY Tract # 13367
Attn: Stave Gilliland
Pear r,:•. G11111and,
In response G> your letter dated September 29, 1989 re8axrling the future
expiration of Wr improvement agreement. I would like to formally request that
we be granted an extension oP approximately 120 days. It is unfortunate that we
are not complete with our improvements, however even though we obtained a final
map L1 december 1988 we were not allowed to commence any onaite improvements
until the end oP Aprii 1989.
The salrce of the delay in the installation oP the improvements is the last
minute requirements that we install a portion of the master planned etoxm draLl
ir'F Amethyst even though St was not a requirement of our tentative map.
At this point we are waiting for the proper pipe 4a arrive and the gas company
ro L~s4a11 the proper fittings in the relocated gas line. (as of this writl.ng
«4,. w~..~ .,....t ~:,v a._.. 4E.n ..e..w~s o.+.+ o__ .•ne.i,. t.+.w.ma rn inc+nll.ot lr,n na amn
sa the Oity~isaues the approval.)
With the pips wid the gas company Faginning their construction we should be ablr_
~; cemplate air improvements within the requested 120 days.
Thatilc YW ,
~7 FI,
]BIOTA YFPRA AVFNVF, YJ~iE 70> aivF9LOf CAI'.FO9NiA %505, JI~~E89~fmt9
/~f6
RESOLUTION ND. U l - S ~ B
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13367
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension
executed on November 1, 1989, by QulMessence Development as developer, for
the improvement of public right-of-wyy ad,~acent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of
Highland Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street; aM
NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and sub,{ect to Lhe terms thereof, is to be done in
con,iunctton with the development of said Tract 13367; and
NHEREAS, said improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
T
DATE:
TD:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
--CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 1, 1989
City Council and City Manager
~r
Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector
Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECOMEMDATION:
The required street improvements for Tracts 12642, 12935-44 MaJor Streets
have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that
City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee
Bond in the amount of f207,600.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and authorize the City Cierk to release the
previously reduced Faithful Perfornmnce good fn the amount of
f207,600.00.
Background/Malysls
Tracts 12642, 12935-44 Major Streets - located at the northeast corner of
Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue
utvtwrtH: Kaurman a Nroao
3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C110
Ontario, CA 91164
Accept:
Release:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f207,600.00
Faithful Perforwwnce Bond (Street) 5207,600.00
ResD 1y ltted,
c
/ // ~- _~~
:SMG.sJm
Attachment
/ `~ D
RESOLUTION N0. ~R- S3I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYENENTS
FOR TRACTS 12642, 12935-44 MAJOR STREETS AND AUTHORIZING
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
dHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 12642,
12935-44 Major Streets have Deen completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
1~9
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and Ctty Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
The required street improvements far Trac4 12936 have been completed in
an acceptahle manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of
f10,800.00, authorize the City Engineer to ftle a Notice of Completion
and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n
the amount of f108,000.00.
Background/Malysi s
Tract 12936 - located on the west side of Hillview Loop at Kettle Peak
P1 ace and Mt. Palomar Street
DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development
2025 i.ensury varK last, Suite 16bU
Los Mgeles, CA 90067-3097
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f10,800.00
Release:
Faithful Peeforwance Bond (street) 5108,000.00
Respec omitted,
~~~
- ~~
R .s m
Attachment
/~
RESOLUTION NO. ~ R-~ 3p
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 12936 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FDR THE NGRK
NHEREAS, the construction of public improvea~ents for Tract 12936 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of
San 8ernardlno County.
/v /
-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November I, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspecto~r9
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
RECOMIENBATION:
The requtred street Tngrovements far Tract 12939 have been completed in
an acceptable manner, and tt is recommended that City Council accept said
improvements, accept the Maf ntenance Guarantee Bond 7n the amount of
f8, 500.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the
amount of t85,000.00.
Background/Malysis
Tract 12939 - located on the east side of Hillvler Loop at T1oga Peak
Court, Pikes Peak Court and Kettle Peak Place.
DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development
2v~G CanCur•y iar'a Iasi, ~Uiie 15bU
Los Mgeles, CA 90067-3097
Accept:
Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Streetl f8,500.00
Release:
Faithfui Performance Bond (Streetl (85,000.00
Resp submitted,
,
RHM:SMG~
Attachment
~~~
RESOLUTION N0. 8 ( ~ =J~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TRACT 12939 ANO AUTHORIZING '(HE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE NORK
NHEREAS, the construction of public taproveaents for Tract 12939 have
been coerpleted Lo the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NHEREAS, a Notice of Coapletion is required to be filed, certifying
the work coa~plete.
NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coapletian with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
/53
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A.,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: CTty Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
By: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Narks Engineer
SUBJECT: Accept the Red Hill Park Storm Drain Improvement Protect,
Contract No. 89-082, as complete, release bonds and
authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of
Completion"
RECOMMENDATION:
It is receapended that the City Coundl accept the Red H111 Park Storm
Drain Improvement Protect as complete, authorize the City Engineer to
file a Notice of Gampletion", and authorize the retention of the
Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (181,914.30 to be used as the
Maintenance Bond for one year, and authorize the release of the retention
1n the amount of f9,923.52 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount
of 590,947.15, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims
have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of
f188,546.79,
Background/Analysis
The subtect protect has been completed in accordance with the approved
plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The finai contract amount is (188,546.79 which includes 1 minor change
orders for additional restoration of take pump equipment.
Respe . y ubmitted,
R w
cc: Purchasing
/~~
RESOLUTION N0. ~'(" ~ ~ 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS
FOR RED HILL PARK STORM DRAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
aF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORK
NHEREAS, the construction of public i~provements for Red Hill Park
Storm Drain have been cospleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
NNEREAS, a Notice of Coiapletion is required to be filed, certifying
Lhe work complete.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Ciky Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coapletion with the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County.
/~~
--- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r„
STAFF REPORT
~.-
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Proposed Intention to Excavate the Alta Loma Basin No.
1 located north of Banyan Street between Archibald and Hermosa
Avenues within Assessment District 84-2 and the calling for bids
for said basin excavation, Asses went District No. 84-2 (Alta Lama
Storm Drain) - Bid Na. 3, to be funded from Assessment District
Drainage System Fund, Account No. 80-4637-6028.
RECOMEMDATION•
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolutions for:
A) A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANGES
AND MDDIFICATIONS IN THE NORK IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ANO SETTING
PUBLIC HEARING.
B) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIiY OF RANCHO CUCMAONGA,
CALIFORNIA REFERENCING PREVAILING NAGS SCALE AND DIRECTING CALL FOR
CONSTRUCTION BIOS
BACKGROUND/ANILLYSIS•
ThSS report presents the Engineering Staff's Intent and recommendation for
construction of additional storm drain facilities within Assessment District
84-2, to be funded from remaining assessment revenue. Plans and
stafffiandiapproved by nthemmCltyudEngi eerciaTheEproposed~storn ddrain will
supplement and orovlde consistency with the City's Master Planned Drainage
Facilities.
The estimated construction cost 1s 5140,000 without contingencies and the
1989~aBid OpeningrDate40~Novemberg29,A1989tati 2 OOap m.; PubllceHearing and
Award Date: December 20, 1989.
See attached " ertificate of Assessment Engineer"
Respectf u it d,
J~_~~
RHM:MD:pam
Attachnw!nt
/5~
CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 84-2
(ALTA LOMA STORM OAAIN(
CERTI}IdT'6 OR A38E33!lQIIT 6NOIN66R
RMARDINO CBANGE9 AND MODI}ICATId13
The ands re igned does HEREBY CBATIPY under penalty of perjury that the following is
atl true and correct:
.. That the undersigned was the Assessment Engineer for the original proceedings
foe a epeclel assessment district conducted pursuant to the provisions of the
"Nun Lcipal Improvement Act of 1913", being DLvielon 12 of the Streets end
Highways Cotle of the State of California, said special assessment dLetrict De ing
known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 84-2 (ALTA LOMA STORM DAA IN)
(here in eft er referred to as the "Assessment Diet rlct"(.
2. As Assessment Engineer, the undere Lgnad was responsible for the erlginal spread
and apportionment of the original eeeesemente Sn accordenre with the benefits
received to all percale of property wlthln the bounderlae of the Assessment
D istr lct.
3. The undere lgned hee a[ this time reviewed the proposed changes and modifications
to the works of improvement as proposed for [hs Assosment Dlatrict and hee made
a preliminary epreed of the costa and eegnsee fot the proposed work to all
parcels end properties that banef It within the Doundar lee of the Assessment
Dletrlct.
4. The undersigned hee furtMr reviewed tM surplus monies remeinlnq at this time
in the Improvement Pu nd following the complallon of the nrininat ..~.w ~_
rmprovement for the Assessment Dletrlct.
5. There ie atlequale surplus monies eval3aDle to eccomplleh the Funding of the
propesetl modified works of Lmprovement for the Assessment Dlatrict.
6. The epreed of the eesesemente far the modif isd work would lmpect and bene[lt all
properties wlthln the Dounderles o! the AeseesaNnt Dletrlct, and thus no modlfi-
cetlon or readjustment of aaeassmsnta is necesaery et this time.
7. NO ASSBSBMBNTB MILL BE~`I NCRBA86D BY REASON OF TB6 PAOP0960 CHANGBS AND
MODIFICATIONS.
68ecuted this ~V day of w~ 1989, at Newport Beach, Cal ltornla.
DON SOC IATES
BNOIN66R
CITY O! MNCHO CUCAMONOA
9TAT6 O} CALI}ORNIA
/57
,,+.
RESOLUTION N0. 8 g' ~ 3
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANGES AND MDO IFICATIONS IN
THE NORK IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND SETTING
PUBLIC HEARING.
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has
previously initiated proceedings and held a public hearing Dursuant to the
terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for
an assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 iALTA LOMA
STORM DRAIN) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
NNEREAS, at this time it appears to this legislative body that certain
changes and modifications are necessary, and that, pursuant to the provisions
of Section 10353 of said Streets and Highways Code, it is necessary that this
legisiatlve body adopt a Resolution briefly describing the proposed changes
and giving notice of a time and place for a public hearing where persons may
appear and show cause why said changes should not be ordered; and,
NHEREAS, no assessments will be increased 6y reason of the proposed
changes and modifications.
NOM, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true an4 correct.
SECTION 2. That the public interest, convenience and neeecclr~ ro~~,+re"
and is is me intention of this legisiatlve body, to order certain
changes and modifications 1n the proceedings and the works of
improvement for this Assessment District described as follows:
The construction and installation of additional storm drain
facilities and appurtenances to serve all properties within the
baundarles of the Assessment District. a~ -may,
SECTION 3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE IST OAY OF NOYENBER,
1989, AT THE MBUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING
PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE LIONS PARK COMMUNITY
CENTER LOCATED AT 9161 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, [S THE TIME AND PUCE FIXED FOR HEARING ANY PROTESTS
OR OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND MOOIFICIITIONS AS
PROPOSED TO BE MADE BY THIS RESOLUTION. ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY
APPEAR BEFORE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY AND SHOW CAUSE NHY SAID
CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE KITH
THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION. ANY OBJECTIONS MUST BE IN
WRITING AND FILED KITH THE CITY CLERK BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT
ANY TIME NOT LATER THAN~THE;T~`IME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARIHG.
lN~"
Ik-~~
l S~
SECTION 4. The City Cierk is hereby directed to certify to the adoption of
this Resolution and cause a copy to be published once, not less
than ten (10) days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.
Said publication shall be in the GAILY REDORT, a newspaper
designate6 for legal publications under these proceedings.
SECTION 5. Said changes and modifications do not propose any increase in
assessments in the Assessment 61str1ct.
SECTION 6. These changes and modofications are hereby ordered pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 4.5 of Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913".
SECTION 7. Any changes made pursuant to said Chapter shall not release or
discharge the sureties under any bonds as required under this
Oi vi slon, if applicable.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of Iggg,
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY OF NANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
J /
RESOLUTION N0. ~ l ' S 3 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCMAONGA, CALIFORNIA REFERENCING PREVAILING WAGE SCALE
AND DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has
heretofore Instituted proceedings for changes and modifications to the works
of improvement under the provisions of the "Municipal improvement Act of
1913", being DivlSfon 12 of the Streets and Highways Cade of the State of
California, for the construction of certain public works of improvement 1n a
special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0.
84-2 (ALTA LOMA STORM DRAIN) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"1; and,
WHEREAS, at this time there have been submitted for final review the plans
and specifications for the changes and modifications to the works of
improvement far the Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, tt 1s the Intention of the legislative bogy to also call for
sealed proposals ar bids for the doing of Bald changes and modifications to
the work and improvements 1n said Assessment District; and,
variousRclasslflcatlonssofrworkmen requlredhle the performance ofwsafd ~'kthe
NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLYED AS FOLLONS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitais are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the plans and specifications for the changes and
modifications to the works of improvement in the Assessment
District are hereby approved and authorized for bidding.
SECTION 3. That it 1s hereby determined and ascertained that the general
prevailing rate of per diem wages in the iocality to which said
work described is to be performed 1n the natter of the
construction of certain public works of laprovement, together .with
appurtenances, 1n the Assessment District, under Lhe provisions of
the Munlclp>rl'Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for each
craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the
contract, and also the generai prevailing rate for legal holiday
and overtime work of each craft or type of workman or mechanic, is
to accordance with the schedule obtained from the Director of
Industrial Relations, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773
of the Labor Code of the State of California, and rcfercnte 1s
hereby made to copies thereof on file with the transcript of these
proceedings, which said copies are available to any Interested
party upon request. Further a copy shall be posted at each fob
site during the course of construction.
/(ob
SECTION 4. That the proposals or bids shall be opened and examined at a
public meeting so called; and said results of the bidding shall be
reported at the next regular meeting of this legislative body
after the opening of the bids.
SECTION 5. That the terms and conditions for bidding on the works of
improvement for th15 Assessment District are as set forth to full
Tn the Bid Documents in the specifications as previously
approved. Reference is hereby made to said 81d Docuoents
heretofore approved and Identified as follows:
A. NOTICE INYITING SEALED PROPOSALS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. BA-2 (ALTA LOMA STORM GRAIN)
BID CALL N0. 3
CONSTRUGTION BID OPENING GATE: NOVEMBER 29, 1989
B. NOTICE INYITING SEALED PROPOSALS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 84-2 (ALTA LOMA STgiM DRAIN)
BID CALL N0. 4
CONSTRUCTION BID OPENING DATE: TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY
ENGINEER.
For all particulars as t0 bidding, the Notices Inviting Sealed
Proposais above referenced and all incorporated documents and
laws, Including but not limited to the "Municipal Improvement Act
of 1913", shall control.
SECTION 6. That it 15 hereby determined that 7n the ayes. !h~ ~--tract;,;
contracting owners included, does not complete the work within the
time limit specified to the contract or within the time Limit as
shall be authorized, the contractor or contracting owners, as the
case may be, shalt pay as liquidated damages the amount or amounts
as set forth in the specifications for the pro,lect, said amounts
herein referenced and so incorporated. That it is impractical to
determine the actual damage which will be sustained by reason of
such delay, but that the stated sum 1s a reasonable amount for said
liquidated damages and 1s not being imposed as a penalty.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of _____ _ ___ _ 1989.
C1TY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA /~
ORDINANCE N0. 400
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CISTRI CT
AMENDMENT 89-02, PRE-ZONING APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACRES OF
VACANT LAND TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES AND MAKE FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152 -01, 02 03, 04, AND 18
A. Recitals.
(i) On ,1uly 26, 1989, the Planning Cammissf on of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-
referenced Development District Amendment Pre-Zone. Following the conclusion
of said public hearing the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council adopt Development District Amendment No. 89-02.
(ti) On October 18, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly molt led public hearing and concluded said hearing
prior to its adoption of this Ordinance.
(iii) A11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain
a~ iuiiuWe:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECT IOPi 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project
has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environ-
mental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds as
follows:
a. The subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of
access, site, and compatibility with existing land
use in the surrounding area; and
b. The Droposed district change would not have
significant adverse impacts on the environment nor
the surrounding pro pertfes; and
c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Pian.
l6a
Ordinante No. 400
Page 2
SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rantho Cucamonga hereby
approves Deve o ent District Ivnendment 69-02 Pre-Zoning the district designa-
tion Low Density Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) for those
properties located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues.
SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fffteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
(63
ORDINANCE N0. 401
AN OROINAN CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEV ELOPME NI AGREEMENT
89-03 FOR AP PRO%IMATE LY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LANG LOCATED
AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF H[GHL AND ANO ROCHESTER AVENUES
AND MAKSNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-152-01,
02, 03, 04, and 18
A. Recitals
(i) California Government Code Section 56864 now provides, in
pertinent part, as follows:
"The Legislature find and declares that:
(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of Development
projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and
other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and
commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient
utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
(b) Assurance to the applicant for a Development project that
upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in
accordance with existing policies, rules an.1 regulations, and subject to
conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage
private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs
of Development".
(ii) California Government Code Section 56665 provides, in pertinent
part, as follows:
"Any city may enter iri[o a Development Agreement with
any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the
Development of such property as provided in this article .
(iii) California Government Code Section 56865.2 provides, in part,
as follows:
"A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the
Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of
use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provision for
reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development
Agreement a~ ,~1~~^e ondi tic n~ term re- -ictions, acid requirements for
subsequent m discretionary actions, provided~Lthat such conditions, terms,
restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent
Development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of
Development set forth in the Agreement ."
(iv) "Attached to this ordinance, marked as Exhihit "1" and
incorporated herein by this reference, is proposed Development Agreement 89-03
concerning that property located at the southwest corner of Highland and
Hoc hester Avenues, and as legally described fn the attached Development
Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, that Agreement attached hereto as
/~
Ordinance No. 401
Page 2
Exhibit "1" is referred to as the Development Agreement".
(v) Concurrent with this Ordinance approving this Development
Agreement, the City Council has adopted an Ordinance approving Development
District Amendment 89-02 for the purpose of pre-zoning the property to Low
Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre).
(vi) On July 26, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonr= held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the application and
roncluded Said hearing on that date and reconmended approval.
(vii) On October 18, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the application.
(viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2: In conjunction with this Development Agreement, an
Envirarunenta ssessment, in conformity with the requirements of the
California Environmental puality Act, has been prepared. The Commission has
drtc*, ;; ',a' t6ut Giio p, uj eti wuuid not nave a sigm ficant adverse effect on
the environment, and hereby adopts a finding of no significant impact on the
environment and issues a Negative Ceclaration.
SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the
above referenced public hearings on July 26, 1989 and October 18, 1989,
including written and oral staff reports, together with publit testimony, this
Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The ~ubj ect property is suits 6le for the uses permitted in
the proposed Development District in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
(b) The proposed Development District pre-zone would not have
significant adverse impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding
nro per *_ies; and
(c) The proposed Development District Pre-Zone is in confor-
mance with the General Pian.
SECTION 4: This Council specifically finds that:
l LO~
Ordinance No. 401
Page 3
(a) The location design, and proposed uses set forth in this
Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing
Development in the vicinity.
(b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 5: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general
welfare., and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development
P.greemert.
SECTION 6: This Council approves the Development Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit "1".
SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be pu 6l fished within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Dail Re_~ort, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of ntar0 io, Cat iforn ia, and circulated in the city of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
/~"P
R ECOROI NG REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL T0:
Debra J. Adams
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamo rtga
P.O. Box 807
4a nc ha Cucamonga, California 91730
BEYELOPMENT A6REENEIIT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the thirty-first day
following final adoption of the ordinance approving it (hereinafter, the
"Effective Oa to") by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal
corporation ("City" hereinafter) and Nome stead Land Development (hereinafter
referred to as "Developer").
MITMESSETN•
A. Neci tale.
(i) California Government Code Section 65864 provides as follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
"(a) The lack of certainty in the approval of
development projects can result in a waste of resources,
escalate the cost of housing and other development to Me
consumer, and dfypu rage investment in and commitment to
comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient
utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the
public.
-1-
/~
"!b) Assurance to the applicant for a development
project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may
proceed with the project in accord ante with existing policies,
rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval,
will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private
participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the
ecenomis costs of development."
(ii) Cali fe rnia Government Code Section 65865 provides in pertinent
part as follows:
°~Y citY, may enter into a development agreement
with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real
property for the development of such property as provided in
this article. .
(iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides as
follows;
"A development agreement shall specify the duration of
the agreement, the oermi itad ~,«< ,.s •~.a .,
ar intensity of use, the maximum height and^size of proposed
buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of
land for public purposes. The development agreement may
inciude conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary action, provided that such
conditions, ternis; restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary actions shall not prevent development
of land for the uses and Co the density or intensity of
development set forth in the agreement, The agreement may
prgv;de that construction shalt he comunerced within a
specified time and that the project or any phase thereof be
completed within a specified time."
-2-
l~8
(iv) Developer owns fee title in and to that real property
consisting of approximately 25 acres in the unincorporated area of San
Bernardino County now proposed for annexation to City. Said property is
legally described in the legal description Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
hereinafter i5 referred to as "the Site".
(v) City's General Plan Designation for the Site is low Density
.Residential (two to four dwelling units per acre). Developer and Cf ty desire
to provide through this Development Agreement specific development criteria to
be applicable to the Si 4e upon its annexation to City which will provide for
maximum efficient utilization of the Site in accordance with sound planning
principles.
(vi) mis Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of
Article 2,5 of Chapter 4, Title 1 of the Cali fo rn iz Government Code commencing
with Section 65864 thereof,
(vii) City has determined that the use and intensity of use
proof ded in this Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan.
(v;;;l e< ^,_rt ^` t`a ,:, u~eaa ur approv mg this Agreement, City has
undertaken, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the
required analysis of the environmental effects whi cA would be caused by the
agreement and adopted a resolution documenting compliance with CEQA.
(ix) As further consideration for the assurances provided by~this
Agreement to Developer shpt Developer will npt be prevented from developing
the Property, City has requested Chat developer provide, and is willing to
provide, certain additional sums and agreements to construct and transfer to
the pu6l is certain additionai improvements.
D. Agreement.
NDW, THEREFDRE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
~~
1~
1, Zoning/Pre-Zoning Designations. The parties hereby agree [hat
City's zoning and prezoning designation for the Site hereby fs deemed to be
Low Residential (L) District subject to the sDeci fic terms and provisions
hereof which shall supersede conflicting standards and requirements of the Low
Residential (L) District so long as this agreement is in full force and
effect,
2. Term of the Agreement. The term of the Agreement shall commence
on the effective date and shall ex Di re on December 31, 1997, so long as
Development rend ins in material compliance with this Agreement, as from time
to time anre nded.
3, Standards and Conditions. The fallowing development standards
and conditions shall govern the development of the Site during the term
hereof, subject to the provisions of paragraph t here in above:
A. City shall allow the Site to be developed to a density of,
not greater than, the Tract MoD (TT 13835), approved Dy San Bernardino County,
December 19, 1988, Development of the tract shall be in conformance with the
City Stan da rAz of •tie !cy; ,^, ;;~~„L; of (~j uistr ict or as modified by the
County Conditions of Approval,
B. If required by City as a condition of development of the Site
or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall ton sent to the application
of the Me11o-Roos Facilities Act of 1982, the Municipal Improvement Act of
1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the Improvement Bond Act of 1915,
the Landscaping and Lighting act of 1912, and any and all other available
proceedings to provide for public corufutt financing for the construction of
public improvements required as a con di tf on to Bevel opnK nt of the ST to or any
porti o^. or rort ions tha rcn f,
-4-
f ~~
C. In lieu of the dedication of land located within the SiCe,
Developer shall pay City's park fees required due to the residential
development of the Site. Said park fees shall he calculated in accordance
with standards in effect at the time any such fees are due and owing or
subject to subparagraph 0. Said park fees sha 11 be pa ya bte for a lot
contained within a final tract prior to the City release of utilities for
occupan.y of that lot for residential use.
D. Subject to subparagraphs 2.E and F hereinbel ow, Developer
shall pay any and all City fees required as a result of development of the
Site, or any portion or portions thereof, at rates current at the time
payable, including, but not limited to, beautification fees, park fees,
systems development fees, building permit fees, and plan check fees. Not
withstanding the fa rego ing, the current fee schedule attached as Exhibit "D"
shall be in effect for the period of twelve (12) months from the aDProval date
of City Council of this Development Agreement and thereafter all fees shall be
based on the fee schedule in effect at that time.
E. No drainage fees are required. Regional drainage wou l.: 6e
as conditioned by the County with any drainage lines needed Dei ng installed by
the Developer.
F. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer
credit against required systems development fees only to the extent of
Developer's direct construction costs incurred in constructing oversized
facilities (i .e., facilities sized to service areas located outside of the
site) which are not located within the Site, ar abutting the Site. Prior to
recordation, the Developer shall contribute his fair share toward the future
signalizatfon of Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue. His fair share is
estimated as E14 ,400.00 based on a traffic report submitted by the Developer's
Traffic Engineer. See Page 1 of the County Conditions of Approval.
-5-
~/
G. Developer shall consent to the creation of an assessment
d is trio or districts to provide for Lhe construction and maintenance of any
and all lighting and landscaping within public rights-of-way within the Site
or abutting Lhe Site pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 or,
if applicable, Developer shall consent to an annexa Lion or annexations of the
Site or any portion or portions thereof tc 3n existing assessment dis tr itt
formula;ed under said Act for that purpose.
H. If required by City as a condition of deve to Anent of the
Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall can sent to the
application of the Mello-Roos Facilities Act of 1982 thereto, or Developer
contribution of equivalent funds, to construct regional drainage facilities.
I. Development of the tract shall be in con fo nna nce with the
requirements of the City Development Code Exhibit "E" Architectural and Design
Guidelines, and the County Conditions of Approval and shall proceed through
the standard City design review process.
J. Developer shall provide each prospective buyer written
notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard
format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any
p rope rty.
K. Developer shall pro of de street improvements as set forth in
Exhibit "C" Supplement to County Conditions of Approval for Tract 13935
regarding street improvements of Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue.
L. Developer shall consent to the annezation to the Commun lty
Facilities District 88-2 in order to provide for continuous law enforcement
services for the project.
M. As determined by the affected school districts, in regards
to school student population impacts, the applicant shall consent to, or
participate in, the establishment of a Mel la-Roos Community Facilities
Df str ict pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the
-5-
/ 7~
applicable School District far the construction and maintenance of necessary
school facilities prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of
building permits, whichever comes first. However, if any School Ois trict has
previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applit ant
shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into
the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final
map or :'.e issuance of building permits, whichever comes first.
Further, it the affected School District has not formed a Mello-
Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of
approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or
issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed
null and void.
N. Developer will provide each buyer with a detailed disclosure
statement of all taxes and assessments on the property. Said disclosure
statement shall first be approved by the City Planner.
0. Developer shall comply to all Conditions of Approval set
forth December 39, 1988 by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors for
I ract 13635 (see Exht bit "B").
4. Applicability of Ci tv Ordinances. Except as expressly modified
herein, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained
in City's ordinances, specific plans, rules and regulations, including, but
not limited to, its Development Code, building code, electrical code, fire
code and plumbing code,-es amended, shall apply to the development of the Site
pursuant to this Development Agreement. Further, any terms or phrases
contained herein for which there are definitions provided in Cfty's said
Development Code shall be deemed to be utilized in accordance with those
definitions.
_7_
X73
5. Rela tionsh iD of Parties. It is understood that the contractual
relationship between City and Developer is such that Developer is an
independent party and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever and
shall not be con5id ered to be the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever,
6. General Conditions. The parties further agree as follows:
A. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, no
representations of any kind or character have been made to one another by any
of the parties hereto or by any of the parties' agents, represzntatives,
associates or attorneys with respect to each subject to which this Agreement
relates.
B, This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties
with respect to each subject to which it relates.
C. This Agreement can only be amended in writing, which writing
must first be executed by all of the parties hereto,
D. No provision of this Agreement may be waived, except in
writing, which writing must be executed by all of the parties hereto.
E. The parties hereto each agree that they shall execute and
deliver to the other, upon request so to do, any and all documents reasonable
and necessary to accomplish or evidence the agreements contained in or
contemplated by this Agreement.
F. In the event that any party shoo ld default in one ar more of
its obligations provided in or contemplated by this Agreement, the defaulting
party shall pay to the other all expenses incurred in connection with efforts
co enforce such obligation, including reasonable attorneys' fees and cos t5,
whether or not salt be commenced.
-8-
~~
G. This Agreement, all other documents and agreements provided
in or contemplated hereby, and all rights and obligations arising therefrom
shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and
their respective heirs, rz presen to fives, successors and assigns.
7, tnd emni flea Lion. Developer agrees to, and shall, hold City and
its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from liability
for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and
claims for property damage which may arise from construction operations of
Developer or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other
person acting on his behalf which relate to the construction and operation of
the Project, excluding claims made from injuries or damages to, or occurring
on, public property. Developer agrees to, and shall, defend City and its
elected officials, officers, agents and employees with respect to actions for
damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer's
activities in connection with the Project, excluding claims made from injuries
or damages to, or occurring on, public property. This hold harmless provision
applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been
suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this Develo Anent Agreement
regardless of whether or not the City pre Dared, supplied or approved the
^~`^' .',JC wile uta im iirc nu et i.
r......, .r^. Llf ,..u uu~~. m J.nc~ ~
8. Ass looms nt. Developer shall have the right to sell. mortgage,
hypothecate, assign or transfer alt or any portion of this Site (as may be
subsequently 5ubd iv ided), to any person or entity at any time during the term
of this Development Agreement. Any such transfer shall 6e deemed to include
an assignment of ali..s ig ht s, duties and obiigatio n5 created by this
Development Agreement with respect to all or any portion of the Site. The
assumption of any or all of the obligations of Developer under this Agreement
pursuant to any such transfer shall relieve Developer, without any act or
~pn pl rr o,ntn by the City, o* its legal duty to perform those obT igations eat ept
to the extent that Developer is in default with respect to any and all
obligations at 'he time of the proposed transfer.
-g-
l~5
9. lunendmen ts. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole
or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the
manner provided far in California Government Code Sections 65668 et seq.
10. Minor Amendments to Develo anent Plan. Upon the written
a pplica-ion of Developer, minor modifications and changes to the Development
Plan may be approved by the City Planner pursuant to the terms of Section
17.02.O10A ("Minor Revf sions--Administrative") of City's Development Code and
substantial changes to the site may be approved by the Planning Commission
pursuant to the terms of Section 17.06.010 (Design /Develo Anent Review).
11. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of
this Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (ar
its successor) by registered or certified mail addressed at the address stated
in this Agreement, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable
satisfaction of Lity within sixty (60) days after such notice 15 given, or if
not corrected within such rea sa na ble time as may be required to cure the
breach or default if said breach or default cannot be to red within sixty (60)
days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced
"f U.... „ .J aini.y (u G) uaye and must cherea rter oe ail igently pursued by
Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under
this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bring any
action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing
out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state
or federal , for in,j unctive relief against any via la Lido by Developer of any
provision of this Agwement, or apply for such other relief as may be
appropriate.
12. Event of Default. Deve lv per is in default under this Agreement
u pan the happening of one ar mare of the following events ar cand itions:
-10-
/ ~(
a. If a material warranty, representation or statement is made or
furnished by Developer to City and is false or proved to have
been false in any material respect when it was made;
6. If a finding and determination is made by City following an
annual review pursuant to paragraph t4 he re inbelow, upon the
basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied in
good faith with any material terms and conditions of this
Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as described in
paragraph 11 hereinabove; or
c. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this
Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in
paragraph 11 here in above.
13. No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any ciaim of defect
Tn performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce this
Agreement. No nperfo nuance by Developer shall not be excused because
performance by Developer of the obl iga ttons herein contained would be
unprofitable, difficu li or expensive or because of a failure of any third
par iy ur eon ty, Diner roan City. All other remedf e5 at law ar in equity
which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement are availabie to the
parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Develo Anent
Agreement. No waiver 6y City of any breach or default under this Development
Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach
thereof or default hereunder.
14. Annual Review. During the term of this Development Agreement,
City shall annually review the extent of good faith compliance by Developer
with the terms of this Development Agreement. Developer shall file an annual
report with City indicating information regarding compl Ta nce with the terms of
this Development Agreement no later than July 15 of each calendar year.
-il-
l77
Cf as a result of such annual review, City finds and determines,
on the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied in good
faith with any of the terms of conditions of this Agreement, City may
terminate this Agreement.
15, Covenants Run with the Land. All of Lhe provisions, Lerms,
covena~ s and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon
the parties and their respective heirs, successors (6y merger, consolidation,
or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees,
and all other persons acquiring any rights or interests in the Property, or
any portion thereof, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever
and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs,
successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns. All of the
provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and
constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to aDPl ica ble law. Each
covenant to do or refrain from doing some alt on the Property hereunder (A) is
far the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of Property, (B) runs
with such lands and (C) is binding upon each party and each successive owner
during its ownership of such properties ar any portion thereof, and each
person having any interest therein derived in any manner through any owner of
>u~ii is nd>, ur any porn on tnereor, and shall benefit each party and its lands
hereunder, and each other person succeeding to an interest in such lands.
Notwithstanding any of the foregoing or in this Agreement to the
contrary, any assignee or transferee or mortgagee which acquires any right or
interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof sha 1~1 take
and hold such rights end interests su bJ ect to this Agreement and shall not
have been deemed to have assumed the Developer's obligations or the other
affirmative duties and obligations of Developer hereunder except:
(i) to the extent that any of such assignees, transferees or
mortgages have expressly assumed any of the duties or obligations of Developer
hereunder;
-12-
( ~ v
(ii) if any such assignee, transferee or mortgage accepts,
holds, or attempts to exercise or enjoy the rights or interests of Developer
hereunder, it shall have assumed the obligations of Developer; and
(iii) to the extent that the performance of any duty or
obligat~.n by Developer is a condition to the performance of a covenant by
Developer, it sha 11 continue to be a condition to Developer's performance
hereunder.
16. Mo rtgage Protection, fiis Agreement sha 11 be superior and
senior to any lien placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof, including
the Lien of any mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach hereof
shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage made
in good faith and for value and any acqui si tf on or acceptance of title or any
right or interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof,
by a mortga qe (whether under or pursuant to a mortgage, foreclosure, trustee's
sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or othernvi se ), shall be subJ ect to all of
the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. No mortgagee shall have
an ohl iga Lion or duty under this Agreement to perform Developer's affirmative
covenants of Ueveloper hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; except
that to the extent that any covenant to be performed is a condition to the
performance of a covenant by City, the performance thereof shall continue Co
be a condition precedent to City's performance hereunder.
Each mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) for a
period of ninety (90) days after the receipt of such notice from City to cure
or remedy, the claim of default or noncompliance set forth in the City's
notice. If the default is of a nature which can only be remedied or cured 6y
such mortgagee upon obtaining possession, such mortgagee shall seek to obtain
possession with diligence and continuity through foreclosure, a receiver or
otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure the default or noncompliance
within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or
noncompliance cannot, with dfllgence, be remedied or cured within such thirty
(30) day Deriod, then such mortgagee shalt have such additional time as may be
-13-
l7~
reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such default or noncompliance if such
mortgagee commences cure during such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter
diligently pursues and completes such cure.
11. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this
Agreement shall be provided by ter ti fi ed mail, return receipt requested, at
the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such
address as may be later specified by the parties hereto.
To Developer: Homestead Land Development
23470 Olivewood Plaza Drive, Suite 240
Moreno Vailey, California 92388
Attn: Stephen L. Heinsohn
To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Base Line Road, Suite C
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Calf fornia 91729
Attn: ,lack Lam, City Manager
io. neco rd ina, to accoraance wttn Ca lifo rn to Government Code
Section 65868.5, a certified copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with the
Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, immediately upon this Agreement
becoming effective.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this
Agreement as of the effective date of the ord ina me approving this Agreement.
-14-
/ga
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated:
By
Mayor
Dated:
Dated:
-15-
By
City C erk
OWNER:
HOMESTEAD LAND DEVELOPMENT
By
/8l
~.. ,.r u. nvnr ~nr ~v
LOCAL.AGENCY_FOANATSOLLSONNL55ION u o ~/ i
LOCKW000 ENGINEERING City of Rancho Cucamonga (Affected A enc )yw rs]/17/B9
8 y ow[
8 SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. _(pjat~u„ llomes, ~lpplicanel-_ er ~YL,
Jep Weal Foornul 8oulararo ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION
nano. Cuucrme 9tJle o[uw,wraw we [ ao 9101
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A11 that portion of [he West 1/2 of the Ea ,C 1/2 of the Southeaa[ I/4 of Section
J0, T. L N. R. 6 N, S.B.B. 6 M. 6aing more particu Lrly des cribad as follavs:
Beginning ac the No r[hwest corner of [he South 1/2 of the South L/2 of [he Northust
ii4 of the Southeast U4 of said Section J0; Thanee S 89'75'09" E along the North
Line of said South 1/2, South 1/2,Northeast l/4, 5outhaaat I/4 a distacna of 660.00
feet; Thence S 0.02'02" N a distance of 129.87 feet to the South line of said Northeast
I/4, Southeast 1/4 Section ]0; Thanee 5 89.75' 21" B along the as id line a distance
of 2.91 feet to the Northeast corner of the Nest l/2, Southeast 1/4, Southeast 1/4
of said Section 76; Thence 5 0.04'02" N along [ha said Bast line of the Nast 1/2,
Southeast 1/4, Southeast I/4 of Section IO a distance of 1791.48 feat to Cha South Line al
said Section 70 be ing the ex is[ing Rancho Cucamonga city 1lm It line; Thanca N
89.76'09" N along the said South line s diatanca o[ 662.L5 fast to the Sauthwot
corner of said South east l/4, Southust 1/4, Section 70; Thanca N 0' 02'02" E along
the sa Ld Nest line oftha East I/Z, Southeast 1/4 Section IO • dlatanu of 1649.55
fee[ Co the true point of Mgtning
J ~77_l9
EXF~fT 'A"
ne ocve-orreNr ~oeec~ewr~
Ti-i3dTS
Aga
LAND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT cmaR
385 North ArloWSeatl Awnw • 5u+ BNnutlino, CA 92/150180 I71, 13B7AY9t 1
January 20, 1989 Expires: December 19, 1991
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ENVIRONMENTAE
PUBLIC WORAB AGENCY
JONN N. JADUE58
LmU Manpemam Oiractpr
OFFICE OF PLANNING
Snnon W. royMOwar
County Plannm9 Officer
OFFICE OF SURVEYOR
Clauee D. Tomlinson. 1.5.
County Survryor
OFFICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
Larry L. ScAOelEOpl, P.E.
County BNIEIny Olficisl
Jeff Blackmon Lockwood Engineering &
Blackmon Y.omes Surveying Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 5269 P.O. Box 396
Riverside, CA 92517 Rialto, CA 92376
RE: 745WVL88004251DC01 W199-62
745WVL88004251TT01 TR 17835
Dear Sirs:
This will advise you that after completion of the environmental
review process, and due consideration thereof, the above-referenced
project was conditionally approved by the Covnty Board of Super-
visors at its meeting of December 19, 1988. Said project was
found to be in camplianca with County policies and regulations
and was approved subj act to the conditions as set forth on
attached pages 1 of 15 through, 15 of 15.
In accordance with the San Bernardino County Development Code,
Fantinn Ra.n2o5l11 all rew iraments spec if led on the attached
sheets shall be met within thirty-six (]6) months after the date
of this letter, or the conditional Approval is void. Ona (1)
extension of time not to exceed three (7) years may be granted.
A written request must ba submitted, with the appropriate fee, to
the Public Information Counter at the address above, prior to the
date oP expiration. PLEASE NOTE: This will be the only notice
given for the above specified expiration date. Tha applicant is
responsible for initiating extension raquasts.
S inceraly, ~-
EPWA/LAND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF PLANNING
~.~v~d'~
TERRI RAHHAL, Associate Planner
West Valley Planning Team
cc: Surveyor/Land Dev. Division cc: county Special Districts
Environmental Health Svcs. County Fire Warden
Building and Safety County Sheriff
TR:rb
/~3 AMEXATION A011EENENT EXM~IT 'B'
BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 1 OF 15
SL'H/87-110/W 119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. All lots Shall have a minimum area of 7,200 square feet, a
minimum depth of ono hundred (100) feet and a minimum width
of 60 feet, (70 feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot
on a cul-de-sac or on a curved streeC where the side lot
lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the
lot, shall have a width of not less than sixty (60) feet
me ~sured at the building setback line as delineated on the
..ompasite development plan.
2. where lots occur on the bulb of a cul-de-sac, a minimum lot
iepth of ninety (90) feet will be permitted. If the proposed
depth is less than ninety (90) feet, a plot plan must be
submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible
and to justify the lesser depth.
3. Roads within this development shall be entered into the
County Maintained Road System.
a. The water purveyor shall be Cucamonga County Water District.
5. Sewage disposal shall be by connection to Cucamonga County
Water District.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE HET PRIOA TO RECORDATION CF THE
FINAL MAP:
OFFICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
6. A preliminary soil report, complying with the provisions of
Ordinance 2815 shall be filed with and approved by the
Building Official prior to recordation of the final map.
7. A geology report, prepared by a licensed geologist, shall be
filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to
recordation. A deposit to cover the costa of the review
shall be submitted with the report. An additional deposit
may be re quined or a refund issued when the costs do not
match the deposit. Tha review costs shall be paid in full
prior to recordation of the final map.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
"o. the foilowinq are the stapa that must be completed to meet
the requirements for installation and/or finance of the
on-site/oEP-site water system and/or sewer system:
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
/V
BLACICMON HOMES PAGE 2 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
A. Where the system is to be installed prior to recordation:
The water system, fire hydrants, and/or sewer system
shall be installed in accordance with requirements of
the State Health and Safety Code, and in accordance with
plans approved by the water and/or sewerinq utility and
the governing fire protection authority. The plans
shall ba reviewed by a Civil Engineer registered in the
State oP California, and contain required certificates
and aooroval signatures. it is t*.e 3evelcper's respcrsi-
bility to submit to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR LAND
DEVELOPMENT SECTION, a copy of the approved plan and a
signed statement from the utility of jurisdiction
confirming that the improvement has been installed and
accepted.
Where a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of
the improvement:
The domestic water plan and/or sewer plan which
meets the requirements of the State Health and
Safety Code shall ba reviewed by a Civil Engineer,
registered in the State of California, and approved
by the water or sewerinq utility and the governing
fire protection authority. The plans shall
contain the required certificates and approval
signatures. A copy of the approved plan shall be
submitted to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR Lnwn nrvFT.Op_
MENT SECTION.
Said engineer shall determine the amount of bond
necessary to install the improvements.
This amount plus ten percent shall be posted
with the County of San Bernardino. A statement
signed by the engineer stating that the
amount oP bond recommended is adequate to cover
the coat of installation of the improvement
shall be included with the estimate and
submitted to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR. ND
DEVELOPMENT SECTION.
or, in cases where the water agency or
sewerinq agency is~a governmental subdivision,
±he bond in the amount of 110 percent of the
coat of installation of the improvement may
be placed with the agency. A signed statement
from that agency s:atinq that financial
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
*#ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
DVS
BLACI(MON HOMES PAGE 3 OF 19
SUB/°'-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
arrangements have been completed shall be
submitted to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR. LAND
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION.
3. Prior to release of the bond for the improvement,
the utility of jurisdiction shall submit a signed
statement confirming that the improvement has been
installed and meets the requirements of all
appropriate State and county laws pertaining to
such improvement. It is the developers responsi-
bility that such signed statement is filed with
the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR LAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION.
*+9. An acoustical study shall be performed to assess noise
levels at the development and shall be reviewed and approved
by the Department of Environmental Health Services prior to
recordation. Prior to issuance of building permits a report
stating that the recommended mitigation measures have been
implemented shall ba submitted to the Department of Environ-
mental Health Services.
COUNTY FIRE AGENCY
10. The development and each phase thereof shall have two points
of vehicular access for fire and other emergency equipment,
and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations
as required in the Development Code.
11. Water systems designed to meet the required fire flow of
~~: _ ., _.._lcr .arcs ~ ~;.• 1 Le oyy,~uveu uy Li,e sire wgency. me
developer shall furnish the Fire Agency with two copies of
the water system improvement plans for signature and a
letter £rom the Water Purveyor stating the availability of
the required Pire flow prior to recordation. Water systems
shall be operational and approved by the Fire Agency or
bonded for prior to recordation. Prior to any above grade
construction occurring, water for fire protection shall be
operational and approved by the Fire Agency.
12. Six (6~~) inch mains shall be required.
*13. Due to the project being in high hazard terrain, hydrants
must be spaced at 400 foot intervals.
+14. ^ue t^ the prcjact being in high hazard terrain, the fire
flow shall be a minimum oP 1500 gallons per minute.
NOTE: Hydrant spacing may be increased and tiro llow reduced,
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
lg~
^LAC2CS0N HOMES PAGE 4 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
should the developer decide to install automatic fire
sprinklers in all the residences.
**15. Developer shall commence, participate in and consummate, or
cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a
Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for Foothill Fira
Protection District, to finance a fire station to serve the
development, including land facilities, equipment and
orerations and maintenance. The station shall be located,
designed and built to all specifications of tY.e Foothiii
Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's
property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected
by the District in accordance with its needs. T_n any
building of the station, Developer shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by
District and Developer by the time of recordation of the
final map. '
OFFICE OF SURVEYOR
LAND DEVELOPMENT/DRAINAGE SFCTrON
16. Flowage easements or San Bernardino County Drainage Easements
shall be obtained where diversion or concentration of runoff
from the site or drainage facilities dewaters onto private
property.
17. Adequate rolls shall be provided on the entrance roads to
the site at Rochester to minimize the possibility oP street
flow entering the site.
18. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct
the off-site tributary drainage flow arounfl or through the
site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or
downstream properties.
19. Adequate San Bernardino County Drainage Easements (minimum
15 feet wide) shall be provided over the natural drainage
courses and/or drainage facilities. The easements shall be
designed to contain the 100-year frequency storm flow plus
bulking and freeboard per County Standard Criteria.
20. In addition to the Drainage Requirements stated herein,
other "on-site^or "off-site" improvements mey ba required
which cannot ba determined from tentative plans at this time
and would have to be rev±ewed attar more complete fmpravement
plans and profiles have been submitted to this of lice.
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
/V
BLACRMON HOMES PAGE 5 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 1e-19-88
*20a
Added by B.O.S.
12-19-88
*21
*22. The developer's engineer shall obtain or provide the necessary
engineering information to forward to FEMA in order to have
the site removed from the flood plain. This information
shall consist of copies of the plans of flood facilities now
under construction, and the hydrologic/hydraulic calculations
put into the format acceptable to FEMA (Hec 1, 2).
*23. The applicant shall contrihute his fair share to the Day
Creek Channel Project. The amount shall ba determined by
the Flood Control District, based on acreage.
*23a. The tract shall not be released for occu anc until Phase
dded by B.O.S. II o Day Cree C anne is comp e e an operations
2-19-BB
OFFICE OF SURVEYOR
LAND CEVE LOPMENT/ROADS SECTION
~ - ~_ _ _
--• °- '--`'--- "'"'"- ~.~1/~~ u~cuviiuy cite cracc snap be
designed and constructed to Valley Road Standards and West
Valley Foothills Community Plan standards of San Bernardino
County, and to the policies and requirements of the County
Transportation and Flood Control Department in accordance
with the Master Plan of Highways.
25. Any grading within the road right-of-way prior to the
signing oP the improvement plans shall be accomplished under
the direction ~a Soils Testing Engineer. Compaction tests
of embankment construction, trench backlill, and all subgrades
shall ba performed at no cost to San Bernardino County and a
written report shall be submitted to the Contracts Division
of the Transportation and Flood Control Department, prior tc
any placement of base materials and/or paving.
26. Final plane and profiles shall indicate the location of any
existing utility facility which would affect construction.
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
*~ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
(VO
Approval shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County
Flood Control District that the site is adequately protected
from the 100-year design storm in accordance with Federal
Em?rgency Management Agency (FENA) regulations and the
County Development Code.
BLACAMON HOMES PAGE 6 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
27. Slope rights shall be dedicated on the final tract map where
necessary.
28. A thorough evaluation of the structural road section, to
include parkway improvements, from a qualified materials
engineer, shall be submitted to the Transportation and Flood
Control Department.
29. Ex`sting Ce:unty roads which will require reconstruction
shall remain open for traffic at all tir„es, with adequate
detours, during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be
made to cover the cost of grading and paving prior to recorda-
tion of the tract map. Upon completion of the grading and
paving to the satisfaction of the Transportation and Flood
Control Department, the cash deposit may be refunded.
3D. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated on Highland
Avenue, Future State Highway 30, Rochester Avenue, Vintage
Drive, and along the rear of double frontage lots.
*31. Future State Highway 30 right of way, including any
interchanges or grade separations, shall be reserved along
the project frontage and shown on the map as per the Cal Trans
letter of August 18, 1988.
32. All road names shall be coordinated with the County Transpor-
tation and Flood Control Department, Traffic Division.
33. Road improvement plans for Highland Avenue-State Highway 30
vuu~i lLou ~~ Li,e ola~e ueparpmenc or •rransportauon
byuayregiatered civil engineer.
34. Dedication shall be granted on Highland Avenue-State Highway
7o as necessary to concur with the Master Plan of Highways.
This dedication is to be coordinated with the State Department
of Transportation.
35. An approved type wall or barrier shall be required along the
rear of double f,Zontaga lots; and shall be constructed outside
cf public right-of-way.
36. All required road and drainage improvements shall be bonded
in accordance with the County Development Code, unless
constructed and approved prior to recordation of the Final
Map.
37. Turn arounda at dead end streets shall be in accordance with
the requirements of the County Transportation and Flood
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
l g9
BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 7 OF 19
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 17835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-08
Control Department, and the Forestry and Fire Warden Depart-
ment.
38. Existing utility poles shall be shown on the improvement
plans and relocated as necessary without cost to the County.
39. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the
required off-site property interests and if he or she should
f=il to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior
to submittal of t.*.e final map, enter into an agreement to
complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
Section 66462 at such time as County acquires the property
interests required for the improvements. Such agreement
shall provide for payment by developer of all costs incurred
by County to acquire the offsita property interests required
in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion
of these costs shall. be in the form of a cash deposit in the
amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer,
at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved
by County prior to commencement of the appraisal.
40. Right-of-way and improvements (including off-site) to
transition traffic and drainage flows from proposed to
existing, shall be required as necessary.
41, Trees, irrigation systems, landscaping required to be
installed on public right of way within this tract area
shall be maintained by other than the County Transporta-
tion/Flood Control Department, and shall be as specified in
C"',.-,tl +~u.,o1,u.La Livuj Biuud vonLrol s2anaaras for tree
planting. Maintenance procedures acceptable to Transporta-
tion/Flood Control Department shall be instituted prior to
recordation.
**42. Prior to recordation, the applicant shall contribute his Pair
share toward the future signalization of Highland Avenue at
Rochester Avenue. His Pair share is estimated as $14,400.00
based on a TzaPf is Report submitted by the applicant's
Traffic Enginpat.
OFFICE OF PLANNING
40. Commitment shall be obtained, in writing, from the sewerinq
agency. Saifl commitment shall indicate that the agency hes
the capacity to furnish sewer service to the subject project,
and that all necessary arrangements have been made with the
agency to supply such services. A copy o! the commitment
shall be filed with the Oftice of Planning.
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
/9~
BLACXMON HOMES PAGE 8 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
44. Developer shall provide for street lighting within the tract
as follows:
A. Low intensity, energy-efficient street lights at all
intersections;
B. Install underground conduit with a pull cord (for
future installation of additional lights) through the
tract;
C. Deposit monies with the Special Districts Department to
cover all installation and connection charges for
additional street lights per adopted County policy
regarding light pole spacing and location.
D. Prior to recordation, the tract shall be annexed to the
appropriate district to provide street light maintenance.
45. Subdivider shall present evidence to the County Surveyors
Office that he has tried to obtain a non-interference letter
from any utility company that may have rights of easement
within the property boundaries.
46. Easements of record not shown on the tentative map shall be
relin quiahed or relocated. Lots affected by proposed
easements or easements of record which cannot ba relinquished
or relocated, shall be redesigned.
47. The following building setback lines shall be delineated on
the composite development plan:
A. A variable front yard building setback line of at least
22 feet and averaging at Least 25 Peet.
B. A side yard building setback line of at least 15 feet
adjacent to side streets on corner lots.
48. Four (4) copies of a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted for
office oP Planning review and approval. Said Landscape Plan
shall include the Lollowinq:
A. The required slope planting. Slope planting shall be
required for the surfacn of all cut elopes more than
five (5) feet in height and till slopes more than three
(3) feet in height. Said slopes shell be protected
against damage by erasion by planting with grass nr
ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding !1lteen (15) feet
in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs,
spaced at not to exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or
~ NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
•~ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
HLACE(MON HOMES PAGE 9 OF 19
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
trees; spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on
centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover
plants. The plants selected and planting methods used
shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions
of the site.
Trees 10$ 15 gal.; 40$ 5 gal.; 50$ 1 gal.
Shrubs 20$ 5 gal.; 80$ i gal.;
Groundcover 100$ coverage.
B. The required street trees.
C. All required walls. All decorative walls shall be
designed and constructed to incorporate design features
such as tree planter wells, variable setback, split
block face, columns, or other such features to provide
visual and physical relief along the wall face.
D. Any existing trees to remain on site. Any existing
eucalyptus trees to be retained shall be topped to
thirty (30) feat, trimmed along the lower fifteen (15)
feet, and cleared oP all dead leaves and branches.
~~
Revised by B.O.S.
i~_io_pa
*E.
49. Four (4) copies oP an irrigation plan shall be submitted Por
Office of Planrinq review and approval when elope planting
is required. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided
with an approved syst¢m of irrfgat ion, designed to saver all
portions of the slope. A Functional test of the system may
be required. Tha maintenance of graded slopes and landsoapad
areas shall ba the responsibility o! the developer until the
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
l ~v
ffiOACI(MON HOMES PAGE 10 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
conditions of Approval 12-19-88
transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is
officially assumed by a County Service Area. All irriga-
tion systems, where required, shall be designed on an
individual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an
approved manner.
50. A minimum number of one (1) inch caliper/15 gallon,
multi-branche3 trees shall be planted on the lot adjacent to
t';e street right-of-way for each of the following types of
lots:
A. Cul-de-sac lot - 1 tree;
8. Interior lot - 2 trees;
c. Corner lot - 3 trees.
The variety of tree to be provided is subject to County
approval and to be maintained by the property owner.
51. All landscaping and irrigation shown on the approved landscape
and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed
or suitable bonds posted for their completion.
Added 6y B.
12-19-88
.dried by B.O.S.
12-19-88
added by B.
~2-19-88
.dried by B.O.S
2-i9-Ba"
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
/93
*51b. The ~~A ~~ Street connection to Rochester Avenve shall be
BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 11 OF 18
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
conditions of Approval 12-19-88
PERMITS SHALL NOT BE I68UED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE
BEEN MET:
OFFICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
52. For projects where grading is to ba done, grading plans are
to be submitted to and approved by the Office of Building
and Safety.
53. Or-air. a demolition permit for any building to be demolished.
Underground structures must be broken in, back-filled and
inspected before covering.
54. Submit plans anfl obtain buildinc permits for any required
walls.
55. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Building OPf icial prior to any
land disturbance between October 15th and April 15th.
56. A tree removal plan, permit and preconstruction inspection
in compliance with the County~s plant protected and management
ordinance shall be approved prior to any land disturbance
and/or removal of any protected trees or plants.
COUNTY FIRE AGENCY
*5i. All roofing materials used in this project shall be oP a
non-combustible material. Treated materials oP a temporary
nature will not be accepted.
OFFICE OF SURVEYOR
LAND DEVELOPMENT/DRAINAGE SE ION
*58. A permit shall ba obtained from the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for work necessary within the city streets, such as storm
drain cannactions.
OFFICE OF SURVEYOR
LAND DEVELOPMENT/R0~1 SECTION
59. An encroachment permit, or authorized clearance, shall be
obtained from the County Transportation and Flood Control
Department prior to isaunnca of a grading permit by the
Office Of Building and Safety.
60. An encroachment permit shall be required from the State
Department of Transportation prior to any construction within
state right-of-way.
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
~~1
BEACICMON HOMES PAGE 12 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
*61. Projects subject to a building permit shall have all required
on and off-site improvements, required for each phase,
completed and approved prior to final inspection of any
buildings or structures. The term "phase" as used here shall
mean the following: "The block of building permits drawn on
less than the whole project" or "A plan of building
construction which indicates blocks of construction of less
than the whole project". In each phase, the installation of
any on or o£f-site improvements shall be sufficiently
completed so as to assure protection from storm or drainage
run of P, a safs and driveable access for fire and safety,
and the ordinary and intended use of the buildings or
structures. The Building Official, with the concurrence of
the Office of the Surveyor, may approve any plan or approve
a change to an approved plan, which complies with the intent
of this policy.
OFFICE OF PLANNING
*62. Prior to issuance of building permits the developer shall
provide certification from the appropriate school district
as required by California Government Code Section 57080 (b)
that any Pee, charge, dedication or other £orm or requirement
levied by the governing board of the district pursuant to
Government Code Section 53080 (a) has been satisfied.
63. A final grading plan shall be required. Snid grading plan
shall ba submitted to the Office of Building and Safety for
review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
A. ee limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a
maximum vertical height oP thirty (30) feet. Setbacks
from top and bottom of slopes shall be a minimum of
one-half the slope height.
B. 8e contcur-graded to blend with existing natural
contours.
C. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between
individuaTlots.
*6a. Recommendnd maximum heights for menufacturad slope banks are
listed below. Vertical height shall be the measurement
between the elevation of the toe and top of the elope
including sataininq walls. The natural slope Lar grading
purposes shall be determined on a parcel by parcel basis,
using the high and low elevation of the area to be graded.
Maximum heights shell not be exceeded unless grading can ba
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
/95
BLACHMON HOMES PAGE 13 OF 19
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
Conditions of Approval 12-19-B8
significantly reduced by increased height. Alternative
designs that would reduce slope heights are preferred. Any
bank exceeding twenty-five (25) feet, regardless of length,
shall have variable gradients.
A. The maximum slope height where the natural terrain is
ten (10$) percent or less, is tan (10) feet.
P The maximum slope height where the natural terrain is
greater than ten (10$) percent but less than or ecual
to fifteen (15$) percent, is fifteen (15) feet,
C. The maximum slope height where the natural terrain
exceeds fifteen (15$) percent, is thirty (30) feet.
*65. During construction, measures shall be taken to control
runoff from construction sites. Filter fabric fences, heavy
plastic earth covers, gravel berms or lines of straw bales
are a few of the techniques which should be considered.
*66. Grading shall be phased so that prompt revegetation or
construction can control erosion. Where possible, only those
areas which will later be resurfaced, landscaped or built on
should ba disturbed. Resurfacing of parking lots and
roadways should take place as soon as practicable, not at
the completion of construction.
67. A copy of the final grading plan, approved by Building and
Safety, shall be submitted to the OlPice of Planning when
graded m,t alnnoa evrnaA Piwn /S\ fnnh In hni ~Y.f ._.._a ctii
slopes exceed three (3) Peet in height.
SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIHD UNTIL THE FOLLOpINO
CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN METs
COUNTY FIRE AGENCY
68. Address numerals shall be a minimum of four inches in height
on a contrast~j(sg background, and shall be visible from the
street. During the hours of darkness they shall be internally
illuminated. (Standard No. 122).
69. Each chimney used in coniunetion with any lireplace or any
heating appliance in which solid or 1lquid fuel is used shall
be maintained with an approved spark arrester as identified
in the Vnitorm Fire Cods (Standard Number 131).
* NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVfi MEASURES
/ ~Y
IDi,ACkMON HOMES PAGE 14 OF 15
SUS/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835
conditions of Approval 12-19-88
Revised by
a.o.s.
12-19-BR
OFFICE OF SURVEYOR
LAND DEVELOPMENT/ROADS S CT ON
al/~F///RR+F,lT6'9XRY0/]W.9'UUNk//BMtlNY/ bE
P~/.
MAN/d
Revised by
B.O.S.
12-19-SB
.evised by
_.O.S.
12-19-88
rr;w/
73. All required road and drainage improvements shall be installed
prior to occupaff'dy.
OFFICE OF PLANNING
74. Sidewalks shall be provided throughout the tract, including
all peripheral streets.
75. Utility lines ahall be placed underground in accordance with
the requirements of County ordinance.
+ NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S)
~•ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
/9 ~
AAA////~b'd /i&'dbfiddt6~i//tyVdyidA',/Nt,4t/YdfiB~/l(bktNd//Y~1 x:ASfd dAGYd d//s)16M!/]SA'
Q.feytG4,6'd/i`.b/df6VYdd/A/dv(6A//a(d6M~'dKd/R'dK/kA>'/.1,1 ati/,t,u.v,~~r,e;~/ir,a
HLACIQiON HONES PAGE 15 OF 15
SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13935
Conditions of Approval 12-19-88
76. All required landscaping and walls, as per the approved
landscape plan, shall be installed prior to occupancy.
~ NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S~
*•ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
l/v
Exhibit "C"
Conditions of Approval
Street Improvements on Rochester and Highland Avenues
A, Rochester Avenue shall be constructed full width from Highland
Avenue to the north pro3ect boundary. The vertical and horizontal
aliynment shall conform to the City's approved street plans,
including appropriate transitions to align with a major arterial on
the south side of Highland Avenue. The Developer shall revise the
approved plans to include the east side of Rochester Avenue; to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to Issuance of an
encroachment permit. The Developer shall be reimbursed for actual
audited costs for constructing those improvements shown on the
approved street plans for Parcel Map 9192 (Sheets 3 and 4 of Drawing
No. 1215) from funds on deposit for the ultimate improvements.
B, Highland Avenue shall be constructed full width (44 feet of
pavement) for the entire length of the Dro,lect frontage and for 442
feet west of the centerline of the intersection of Highland and
Rochester Avenues with appropriate transltlons to the existing
pavement beyond those points. The Developer will he given a
retm6ursement agreement to recover the cost of constructing the full
width permanent street improvements from future development as it
occurs on the south side of Highland Avenue.
Interim right turn decelera tl on and acceleration lanes for westbound
h•affi~ ehall ho efr nhnA •hn ..fh nlAn ..F Yl nhl ..,A m,.
with transltlons ton meet then~permanent pavement at both ends, in
conformance with the City's approved plans. The Developer shall be
reimbursed for actual audited costs for construtting those
improvements shown on the approved street plans for Parcel Map 9192
(Sheet 11 of Drawing No. 1215) from funds on deposit for Lhe
ultimate improvements.
//~ SUPPLEMENT TO COUNTY CONgTNNIS OF AVPNOM-L
r _/ Ai~NdEXAT10N 89-03 EXf#&T "C'
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA:VIONGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEES
`-`~$~r
.'~ "r
tI ~
Y ~ ~ ~
n H
z
r°" I
The foglowing fee schedule is in effect for the 8uiiding and Safety,
Engineering and Planning Divisions of the Community Development Department.
Please address any questions you may have about specific fees to the
Department in which the fees are collected. Fees are listed within the
Department heading responsible for the fee and the key code listed below wi',1
indicate at what point Che fee should be paid,
(1) Upon submittal for review or application
(2) At time of permit issuance
(3) Prior to approval of final map
(4) At time of plan check submittal
Plannin Diriston Fees
Mtat ve ap a ittal
Tract Map
(1) Initial Study Part I
rll Frhone<,.. _s ~Cn t.ai.e ii a~i riap
(1) Planning Development Review Fees
Design/Technical Review (Com'1 8 Ind)
Minor Development Review
Res. Oev. Design/iec hni cal Review
Co ndittonal Use Permft
Specific Plan/Planned Community
En vi ron. Assessment (Initial Study Pt.i)
Sign Permit (Ind:.vi dual Sign Review)
Uniform Sign Program Review
E649 ~ E32/Lot or actual cost
plus 205, whichever is
greater
E87
562
E251
E62
E1 ,272
E398
E1,251
Eel
332
E93
(I) Nendeenes/Variances
Dev. District Amendment (Zone Change) E649 ~ E32/acre
General Plan Amendment E1,212
~/ariante E272
Minor Exception S62
(1) Other Penits and Deposits
Temporary Use E-0-
Temporary Nodel Sales Office 532
Sates Office Cash Deposit E2 ,500
On-site Subdivision Sign Cash Deposit E628
Temporary Construction Office f126
apo ~ex~nor~ ea-oa Exr~ ~
Rrvt ~
(I) ADplals
'Appeal of a Director (Staff Decision) S62
NAppeal of a Planning Commission Decision (126
NAppeal of a Tract Nap E251
'Appeal if filed through City Planner's Office
NAppeal '.s filed through Cf ty Llerk's Office
Enatneerino Division Fees
(t~ Tentative-Nap fuhstittal
Parcel Map j201
Ini tiai Study, Part [ f87
Revert Subdivided Land to Acreage f62 + f1.25/acre
(1) Appeals
(parcel Map f125
(Appeal is filed through City Clerk' s Office
(I) Extension of Tentative Map
Parcel Map f62
(1) Certiftate of Capllance For:
Lot Line Ad,jusUnent 3186
Parcel Map Waiver (186
Mercers jioo
(1) street vacation Request (125
(3) Monunentation Surety j2 ,400 + j50/Lot
(Cash Deposit, Refundable)
(4) Map Checking Fees
Residential Parcel Maps f600 + j80/parcel
Tract Maps and Ngp;Jtesidential Maps of
10 lots or less (905
Tract and Parcel Maps over 10 Lots (755 + f15/lot or parcel
(4) t~provenent Plans :~
Widening of EzlStfng Streets ;0.60 per lin. ft. + sheet
charge for interior streets
Interfar Streets: 1-2 Sheets (600 per sheet
3-5 Sheets f1,200 * f525/sheet over 2
Sheets
6-10 Sheets f2,775 + j480/sheet over 5
Sheets
it or More (5,175 + (450/Sheet over 10
Sheets
-2-
Storm Drain Plans: Same as for interior streets
Hydrology Study: Drainage areas up to 150 acres - 5600
Dra ire ge areas over 1S0 acres - (1,200
(d) Landscape P1an5: City maintained areas f310/Sheet
••FOr Improvement Plans, title sheets will not be included in calculating
charges ~nles s, in the City's opinion, it also serves as a plan-and-profile
sheet.
Maxus for rush jobs rill be 50f greater than those listed above. Revisions
to approved plans/maps rill be cMrged on the basis of actwl costs.
(2) Public Yorks Insp. Fee 5.01 of improvement cost to (25.000
4.55 of improvement cost next 575,000
4.Of of improvement cost over f100,000
euildin and Safet Oivistop Fees
2 Bu ng erm t Var es based upon valuation of work
(4) Plan Check Fee 75f of Building Permit fee
(2) Oraf na ge Fee••
General Lity Area S50 per 1/100th of net acre
Etiwanda Area A 8 B S75 Der 1/100th of net acre
Assessment District
d Planned Community Mo Fee
(2) Street and usO~,y.. 1~ of Gu{iuing vaiuanon
Systems Fee ••
(2) Oeautification Fee •• (0.20 per sq. ft. of gross building area
(Residential Only) under roof, or 5200, whichever is greater
(2) Electrical Permits Calculated on a square foot basis for new
residential buildings; on outlet Dasis _ for
existing residential buildings and other
.~ buildings.
(2) Plumbing 8 Mechanical Calculated on basis of number and size of
Permits fixtures and/or appliances.
••ihis fee schedule is not all inclusive -- pt ease check with the 9uilding and
Safety Department for specific fees.
3-
~~
Co~unitr Services Departaw:nL
See attached fee schedule for calculations.
School Fees - Contact appropriate School Di stric is for fee amount and payment
Alt? Loma (114) 987-0766
Central (714) 989-8541
Cucamonga (714) 987-8942
E ti wa nda (714) 899-2451
C ha ffey Nigh School District (714) 988-8511
Unlit Fees Contact appropriate Utility Company, (i .e., gas, electric,
water, etc. for fee amount and payment. A list of utility companies and
telephone numbers fs provided by the Engineering Division.
Undergrounding existing overhead utilities (in-lieu fees) - see separate
handout when fees art required. Current City adopted unit anwunts are as
follows on a per foot basis:
Telephone - j 75
Cable TV - j 30
Electrical - depending upon when undergrounded as Follows:
1986 and before - j1001 1987 - j135: 1988 and after - j128
NOTE: Letters of certifiutton of gpacity rill be required free sclgol
districts aiW ester districts along rith proof of payaxnt of appropriate fees
prior to building penit isswlrce.
-4-
~3
I
Q
a
W
2
N
W
y
Z
a
J
2 4
~ rn
=
~
~ n ~ c
-.
o ~c -'
c n n
~
y N
M
N
N -~
M M p
~ „ N
~ ~ N
5 1 P
V? C
~ ~ ~ ~ 1
P O
4 /~ /~ +n M M
~ ~ V 1'1 N tD
~ ^ ^ N 1~'I N y)
~
~ OJ
~ M
uQY e
O b Ul
n a P i
~ N
4 H H H M M M
~.
Y m N M b W
J Q
.l ~
~ Q
~; b ^ O
Q
`~
~
M M M H M
4 N
N 1 1 1 I 1
Y ^
4 M
J 4 ~:
~
N 1
1 1
1 1 1 i 1
1 ~ 1
4 N
a ~
E
~ a
r N ~ Y ~ !r ~
a° d b ' Z
4 0
H
~ ~
n a ..
~
a ~
a ~ a
E 3 ,~
~~
U
Q
Q
W
a
y
I-~
'~
V_
J
J
W
O
N
V
O
J
L!J
W
H
Z
Q
J
w
W Ii
6
O
LL
J
r
of
J
x c
0
x
~
u N
p ~ ; 1
~ v u
O
~ ~
N
p
~
_ I
i
__
_ I
_ I
I
y
~ O
~ ~ O
~ I
I
'a
L 6 o
w
~
9
C c
,.,
N
i
~
~
i I
i
S - - °-- - -i -- --
'
I ~r -
m i i i i
I
~~
~Q_~
~ol _
1
1
1
1 ,
1
1 ,
~
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
P
O
N _
S g
~ ~ V 6 6
d
N ~ ~ 3 f $
V
J
N
LL
h
6
W
Q
U
a
W
a
N
F
Z
C7
J
J
W
O
a
N
O
J
T.
Y
W I
~ li
O
4l
J
O
0
o
I
~
~
W
1(I
K ~ I I
C
pr
I
;y N
~O
m
I
I
I
1
I
;
I
I
I ;
i
O Y p I
e
I•
I Y `u
G'
4
i 6 O
c
~
N
I
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~•
~ ~ .~N-
N
N
~
M -
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
' Y
F> ri i i i I I
<g
:•n
~
I
I
I
I
I
I -
I
I -
; -
I
I
e
I
.~
I~` I
a p '+ i
I i
I
I I I i i
I
w
e
w
=
e s o
"
~ ~ ~ 1 l f
VVN
a
W
W
Y
a
a
d
W
U
Q
W
a
N
H
Z
'~
V
Z
J
J
W
3
W
W
O
J
Q
ly I.
W S
U.
O
LL
O
H
o
i
1
O
X O
O
ti
i
x
z
O~ N M b ~
.-~
,o m
a Ic N
.. O
m
1
n N R P
M M M M M
01
P LO
Ilf ^
.-~ N
n r`
I ~
. r.
~ I
b
c l T
N O ~
I . u
i ~ ~ ~ 1
y p
Or '+
N N
M M
M In
M 6
I
0 0
o 0
$ 0
$
3~ o o 1
1 1
1
M
i E M M M N
f
}
n
n
In
m
m
i
a N N
• N
• N N
• 1
1 1
5
3 E
C=
C OI
M
M ~ OI
N
~ j OI
N
~ O~
M
....~ P
N
~N
~~I
e
a PI N N N 1 1
<~ ~
i ~
. s P1 ('1 l~l 1"1 f7 1
1 I
I
f
~~' n N f4 O ~ 1 1
gc
=~ l
I I
N
J
D
_ ~ B S
4 e .. ..
~ ~ $ i ~ ~
~O
J
W
LL
>~
K
a
w
U
Q
Q
W
a
N
Z
V
z
J
J
W
a
W
m
z
6
W
W S
W
7
LL
o
.I
0
J
c
X ~
O
N ^
x
i
~ Q m N .p
.
•. i
. N m N 1p
~
F~ Q NY C ID ti
1[f C I~ P O• ~
~ r N
N w
M •-w
M •~
N
M
M
Y :
g=
~ w
m
~
- W
N
b
m
O rn
~°
N
~
m O
°
I(1
m
T "'•
'c
J
L
~ `~
c
J
L
1
1
e~ N
N m
N
1 e
N v
N o
~
I ~ _ _~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i
~ o o ~ S S
la
.
m a~D ~ m m ~
~' ~ M N M M N M
Op -- 6i W Op OG W
b f0 ~O b b b
•w
i u
m
PI
~
m
m
H
I
w N M N N N N
y
~ P
. ~~ ~ i
€ ~
;
e e a w n .n vi
I
l
P j
Y m N N N I
Y
~~ ~
Y !7 M m m m m
is
v
~J ~+ N m Q Q 1 1
L~ w l
I
I
I
I N ~_
I
~ ~
~
O
y
~ ' 3 ~ ~
s
~~
t
41
>r
a
w
z
U
4
Q
W
a
Vl
F
Z
,~
V
Z
J
J
W
0
N
Q
r
2
1
1
W
W
W1 If_
~ i
O
li
r
O
P
o
i
O
X C
0
~1
N
In P 1~ th N
1 !7
~ N
~ 10 OI
N 10
b
1
I 10 Vf O~ O O
q M M q q
I
_~
ii N
O N
W C
O
v
C
C
~ ~I ~ J y I
e
i .
1 (q
1'f OJ
1~ 10
10 L
1 L
N 1
01=
m
d
r` G G
M M M
Y
ie
l
m O
S O
O O
O pO
O
O
a i
1 W m W m W
~ L q N M M N
::
s 0
n 0
n 0
n 0
ri
~ 1 Y1 In N Y1 N I
~ S _ N q H N M
~
~
O
I R N I 1~ N In
1
~
L 1 N N N I
.8
1
I ~ ~ M ~ ~ I
I
~
Y
N
P1
d
o d
O 4
I 2
~ I f ^^
.
~e~ ~
l I
I I
l
l
l 1
l ~
l
l
W
N
~ a u
~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 3
~
~Oq
Z
5
a
w
C
U
d
~l~
Ci.
N
H
J
W
f7
~ .
u
~~~
W
_~
n
a
W la_
~I
0
J
O
0
o
~I
~I
O
K o
i o
a
x
_ ~
M ~ ~
M1
~
N p
T l c
e N
'
r
~~
~ y
I N t
1
u
~ I l o f .. ! o f l 1 I
n ui .
^ 1
~
it N G1
I V' l L
I ~ ~ ~, C i
( i
o° ~ o
O c
C o
G C~a+~I 0
OI
i
_ 9 Q C G p
-~
'
O
G
O
O
O~
~
I - ~
=i
N
N I ...
N
N
~ °
I
L C N
N N N
` -
KO
ri
n
r~
n
n
~ O
LGO N
`
N
I
1~1
I
4
I
P
~ ~
O
^I
C
u
S
a :. _ ~
~~~
®a.
W
Y
Q
S
TENfATINi TRACT 13a~
AACNITECTIAtAi AND OESI611 GUIDELINES
E%NIBiT 'E'
I. ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
A. Intent
It is the Intent of this article to provide gu1de11nes for
the design of strucwns or eleaents wMch reinforce and
establish the chaneter of NorM Et/wane Foothill Ana.
It is also the intent to assure that rear dwelopawnt be
designed 1n a canner that 1s spsftlve to, aM caapatlble
v1tA, the character of NctoMa, Caryn, Etiwanda and Ma
Etiwanda Spec/f1c Plan Ana.
Projects rhlth 1n M• opinion of the Design Revtar
Caaaslttee do not acct the ingnt of this article shalt not
be recaaaended for approval.
B. General Guidelines
I. Pro~act design shall De guided by site-specific
factors such as viers, sawn vegegtion, topography,
surrounding developaant, and s1a11ar
cansldentlans. The use of designs and s1G plans
prepared for another siq shall not N per>ritted
unless sueepstulty eoQlftad to local conditions.
2. Arehle«wral and dplgn Naaalnts rhich relate w Me
aalating and dplred character of North
EtiGilMa/Foothtlls area an Dpi descHbp as:
- rorai, rather than urban
- lnfonaal, rather than for+rl
- tradtttonat, ranter than contesporary
- rustic, rather Man polished
- for profiles, ratMr Man araslva
- relating to paapie, ranter Man autaohtlp
.1-
AI~MEXATION •9.93 EXl~IT 'E'
C. Specific Standards
1. Excessive reDeti tton of single family strucWrcs with
identical floor plans and el evattons shall be
dl scouragad. Footprints and elevations shalt be
dl scouraged. Footprints and el evatl ons shall be
varied per Figure 3-1.
FIGURE 3-1
Number of singly
family daellings
5-10
11.20
21-40
41-60
61 ~0
81-100
Over 100
Minimal nwber
of fooLDrt nts"
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 additional
for each 10
dwelling units
over 100
Mlnimua nuaber
of elevations
per footDrint•
2
3
3
4
4
4
4
A reverse footprint of a floor plan w111 count as an addltloMl
footprint. A side-on entry garage with an elbow drlvewaAy w111
count as an additional footprint.
2. Oweldper shall provide at last 50'L of all lots be
side-on garages. Ilowavar, a reduction 1n thts
nqu/reaant, in St reduction inerawenb, down to a
^tnMw of 20f of all garages within single faalily
Lraeb for side-on entrlas wMre an additional floor
plan per each SS reduction is provldad and tf
approval by the naming Cads:ion. Tha intent is
to discourage a residential street lined with garage
fronts.
3. Orlrwrayf shall not auaed IS feet 1n width through
the public parkway fronbgas on lob lass than
7S feat in w/dth. On lob 7S feK of gnaatar to
width, driveways shall not aseaad 24 /Nt, with a
-2
FOOiPRI1R/ELEyATIOii kayUIRElE1IT5
~/'1
saawM transition providtd to the ultiante driveway
widM within a depth equal to the parkway depth.
4. 1Wo-story structures should not be planned far corner
parcels, unless st deyard setbacks of 25 feet or
greater are used. xwiever, the Planning Caawisston
may const der existing one-story portions of two-story
structures not exceeding 12 feet maybe allowed a
msxieum 15 foot street stdgard setback.
5. The project shall be designed to a manner that is not
only sensttlva to, and caepat/Die with the characters
of the Nctorta, Caryn and Etlwana Caaasunities, but
also reinforces that eharacter through an integrated
design and architectural thane.
6. 1611e no specific architectural style 1s required,
the Integrated there selected shall reflect the
traditional archlteeturol styles found 1n NctArla,
Caryn and Etlwanda, lnciuding Dut not 11e1ted to
Lhasa listed beiaw. My one of Me following theses
any be utilized as dot ant Mauve or Mq any M
interspersed. goM one and Uro story buildings are
appropriate to Me following ategorles.
a. N etorlan
CharacUrlsttcs:
- fieldstone foundations
- sleep giOlfs Gild roOTIIM
- porches and YerandaS
- bay windows
- vertlal windows
- roundllNded windows
- clapbard and fascia
-- bard and Dalton sldlrg
- large roof projections
b. California lungalow
Charaeteristles:
- M p or gable roof/yantly stoptng front
- porchN/veranda, NrlMed foundations
_~
~~~
c. California Ranch
Charackri stl cs:
- law, ranbling
- rustic, tnfaral, front porches/verandas
d. Med1 krranean
Charackristlcs:
- vertical lines, arching windows and
entries, red the roofs
- stucco siding
e. any other lnkgrakd design style which in the
opinion of the Design Review CgalttN nests the
lnknt of this aKtcla.
7. Mskrtals, fixtures, anA architectural hta111ng
shall De consistML with the deign these. "St«co
sWna' prod«ts Syr be wed to crwte sWne eff«ts,
except whm river rock «eun, wh/ch shall be native
stone. Nowwer, tf argr stone prod«ts are used, sane
portion of the units shall include native stone.
8. Along a~or (collaetor or aborel struts and the
strNt sides of corner lots enhancM asanry shall be
proviaed, see exaagin on page 6. All omer fencing
within the roar and sidayards shall be provided at
Lha option of the builder, sW~ect to City review and
approval of the daslgrK aM eonstruetlon.
9. Street s/de landseaptiy and irrigation shall D•
repaired prior to «cupancy.
Said landscape and trrlgattan lalprovanants shall'
firs{-~ba approved 1n plan tors by Ma Design Rwtaw
Caadttaa prfor to the lsswnCa of airy Dutldlnq
parslta. liras plans shall contain the following
elaasnts:
a. Arehttaetorally datgmd all boxes which which
color aches is eonststant wttll the dwe111rq
units provided for eaeA house Dy the bWidar.
SN exaapl• on pegs 7.
.~.
~~
D. Enhanced driveway and front entry walk
trcatsxnts, utilizing decorative DaveaKnts and
wide walkways.
c. In addl tlon to the standard parkway trees. at
least three IS gallon trees Der house would be
planted Dy ffie builder no later than occupancy
of the hoes. also, accent troes of at least 15
gallons 1n size will be Drovided in nuadrors
sufficient to eWal one tree per corner for each
Tntersectlan within the tracts. This tree
planting is to De designed in a ernner to
relieve any eonotgny of the streetseape, perhaps
Dy cluster planting between me homes.
d. Irrigated and turfed areas shall De provided for
each front and corner street side lat.
e. Daseo at the end of the 'A" street cul-da-sac
shall be provided, landscaped and annexed to a
landscape rtntenance district.
.~j.
~/~
CONCRETE CAP
PILASTERS OCCUR EVERY
ao' ro loa o.c.
HEIGHT VARIES S'-S•- 6'-6'
CUT STONE VENEER
STUCCO WALL
FINISH GRADE
TU$UTAR STEE! FENCE
WITH S/!' PICKETT$
® S' O.C. •BEIGE COLOR
PILASTERS LOCATED AT
PRDPEgTY LIFER
VIEW FENCE
S'E~TO d 6~$ FROM
FINIpSN GReeADE
CUCCRDU WgNFRE I~URFCW
OTO FENCEDJACENT
COFK~IETE CRP
+.' STUCCO VMLL
PILASgTERB p~~p EVERY
E7 TO t00' O.C.
FEgNT VAREB FROM S'$' TO
BRICK VENEER
fIN18M GRADE
~// TYPICAL FENCE/WALL TREATMENT'
J~ t
AT PRIMARY ALDNO PER0.IETEF,
ENTRY MONUMENT SITE BOUDIDARY
STANDARD RURAL MAILBOXES
of
III
1~----
2'x5' 6RA8 SUPPORTS WITH
CHAMFERED ENDS
S•xS• POST WITH A CHAMFERED
TOP AND ROUTED GROOVE
RIVER ROCK BASE
FINISH GRADE
TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND • 1
le• le•
0
STANDARD RURAL MAIlBO%E8
2•xS• 6RA8 SUPPORTS WITH
CHAMFERED ENDS
S'xS' POST WITH A CHAMFERED
TOP AND ROUTED GROOVE
BRICK BASE
FINIAN f7A •RF
1p • IB' - r-STANDARD RURAL MAll80XES
3'x8. ORAE BUPPORTS WITH
CHAMFERED EN08
0
S•x8• -08T WITH A CHAMFERED
TOP ANO ROUTED GROOVE
STONE BASE
fIN18N ORAOE
^ NOTE: EACN ALTERNATIVE IS
TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND I8 SUPJICT TO ACCEPTANCE
aY U.B. F08TAl SERVICE
~~~ T TYPICAL MAIL BOX TREATMENTS
TYPICAL MAILBOX STAND +P2
ORDINANCE N0. 307-A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENO[NG CHAPTER 2.28 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;9JNI CI PAL CODE DISSOLVING THE ADVISORY
COMMISSION AND CREATING IN ITS PLACE A CITIZENS
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Ranc he Cucamonga, California, does
hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Chapter 2,28 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
hereby is ame~ed to read as follows:
Cha titer 2.28
CITIZENS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Sections:
2.28.010 Created.
2.28,020 Role of commission.
2.28.030 Membership--Generally.
2.28.04G Membership--Terms of appointment.
2.28.050 Iembership--Removal of members.
2.28.060 Regular meetings.
2.28,070 Officers.
7 7A nan .ln; nt cu Fr nmmit4aa mn a}innc
2.28.010 Created. There is and shall remain in the city government
a Citizens Environmental Management Commission (hereinafter "CEMC"j, a body
replacing the Citizens Advisory Commission which hereby is dissolved.
2.28.020 Role of commission. The CEMC shall act in an advisory
capacity to the City Council and Panning Commission on environmental issues.
2.28,030, Members hi Generall The CEMC shall consist of a~total
of eleven members. Me ers of the CEMC shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga
and shall be appointed by the City Council. A subcommittee of the City
Council shall submit to the City Council the name of any person proposed for
appointment to the CEMC and upon such appointment by the City Council, the
name of the appointee shall be recorded in tfie mi nu t±s of the City Council
meeting. The nine members of the Citizens Advisory Commission dissolved
hereby shall be deemed members of Lhe CEMC for the duration of the term of
office they were serving on the Advisory Commission.
2.28.040 Membership--Terms of appointment. A. The eleven members
of the C~shaTl each serve two-year terms. Either five or six members of
the Advisory Commission shall be considered annually by the City Council. A
member shall continue in office until his/her respective successor is
appointed as set forth below unless sooner removed as provided in this
Cha Dter,
Ordinance No. 307-A
Page 2
B. If a vacancy shall occur, other than by expiration of the term of
office, it shall be filled by appointment of the City Council for the
remainder of the unexpired teen. All regularly expiring teens shall terminate
on December 31st of each year.
2.28.050 Membership--Removal gf members. A. Members of the CEMC
serve at the pleasure of the City Council and may be removed at any regularly
scheduled City Council meeting, upon three working days' prior written notice
to the member. Removal shall be by majority vote of the entire City Council.
B. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the expres-
sions of CEMC members save and ezce pt the guidelines established by the CEMC.
2.28.060 Regular meetings. Regular meetings of the CEMC shalt be
established by resolution of the CEMC.
2.28.070 Officers. The CEMC shall select a chairperson to preside
at all meetings of the CEMC, and a vice chairperson to preside in the absence
of the chairperson. The secretary to the CEMC shall be designated by the City
Manager.
2.28.080 Joint subcommittee meetin s. A. City Council subcommittee
and CEMC subcommittee chair and vice chair) joint meetings shall be held
quarterly on the first Tuesday of each calendar quarter which is not a legal
holiday. In the event this is a holiday, the meeting will take place on the
next regular working day. Special meetings may be called as needed by either
subcommittee.
o ihn :nr ,.,nnla e~~hnnmmifton mnoH nee nhnlt he inr `hn
.n ,.~~
purpose of establishing a CEMC work program and review of matters studied by
the CEMC. Additionally, the City Council or Planning Commission may designate
work program assignments at any time notwithstanding the regularly scheduled
quarterly meetings.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same '~ be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Da il~Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of ntar0 to, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
~/9
CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Novenber 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: JuQy Acosta, Engineering Aide
~~,
IK
SUBJECT: Ordering the Detachment of Tract No. 13063, located east of
East Avenue, south of Highland Avenue, from Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and the Formation of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 8
RECONENDATION:
It is recanmended that City Council approve the attached resolution
ordering the rwrk in connection with the detachment of Tract No. 13063
from Landscape Maintenance District No. i and the formation of Landscape
Maintenance District Na. 8 and approving the final Engineer's Report.
Background/Analysis
Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the
13.x..3 i- -.~. 't °f E'^t ;:y^..~.. - .nth „s
Highland~~ Avenue, fromV Landscape Maintenance District No. ~1 and the
Formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8. The developer of
Tract No. 13063 has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The
attached restitution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively
approved by Resolution No. 89-442.
Respect ul submitted,
~~
RHM:
At~achment
aao
RESOLUTION N0. v~- ,~=.J~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DETACHMENT OF TRACT 13063 FROM LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DI STP.ICT N0. 8 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
did on the 20th day of September, 1989, adopt its Resolution of Intention
No. 89-442 to order the therein described work in connection with the
detachment of Tract 13063 from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and the
formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. B, which Resolution of
Intention No, 89-442 was duly and legally published in the time, form and
manner zs required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said
Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the
Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property
proposed to be assessed for the improvements described 1n said Resolution of
Intention No, 89-442, according to the names and addresses of such owners as
the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly Bailed 1n the time, form, and
manner as required by iaw, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in
the office of the City Clerk; and
uurorec _,1A r1!° r,. mil n.,,i„ Ain ,. _ vi,.,.A •U.. _A ..I d..
oral and documentary, concerning the ~urisdlcti on facts tnVthis proceedi ng~and
concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be
derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,iurisdiction to
order the proposed work.
NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLYED, by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, as follows:
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga at EFie public interest and convenience requires the
formation of the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described 1n said Resolution of
Intention No. 89-442, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the
Engineer s ere y finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of
assessment-fn~c Engineer's ReDOrt are hereby approved.
SECTION 4: Be tt finally resolved that sold assessments shall not
begin until af~60 percent of said tracts have Deen occupied,
~~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 8
TRACT N0, 13063
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY fOR REPORT
This repo-t is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4,
Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Street and Ht ghways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This report deals with the establishment of a Landscape Maintenance District
for the South Etiwanda area. The District will originally comprise of the
boundaries of the Tract No. 13063. Areas to be included in the work program
are the trees and planting within certain rights-of-way of streets and freeway
slopes as determined by the City; street trees and eucalyptus windrows within
street rights-of-way and within dedicated tree maintenance easements as
required by specific plans or by the City Council, the public parks, the
greenway and paseo systems, community gateways, regional and comunity trail
systems including lighting, signing, striping and all other Improvements such
as play equipment, fences, walls, etc, within those systems; such similar
areas as required Dy the Specific Ptan or by the City Council or as dedicated
by various subdivisions.
The work program generally excludes the parkways landscaping (except the
street trees) adjoining the fronts and sides of single family residences,
adi n7 ninn nil •iiaaT lv nN AnnN .1 .M ~. ...A .Ai..i-i--
,. ... ...~ ...~. ~.~-.... .~, -.. ..... •~-~ u~,•... ur... uuJUl~, ll,.f ,.VMM1CI .. ,ul Y,1„
institutional development which wilt be maintained by those developments.
The District will eventually include the ma,{arity of the areas included within
the South Etiwanda areas and other areas generally comprised of properties
bounded on the north by Highland Avenue, on the south by Foothill Boulevard,
on the west by Etiwanda Avenue and I-15, and on Lhe east Dy east city limit.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF NOAK
The areas listed above will become part of the active work program at such
time as the specific areas are dedicated to and accepted by the City. The
normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, the areas
improved by the developer with landscaping, irrl9ation and other required
improvements, then after a period of maintenance by the developer as
determined by the ri+y Engineer, the acceptance of maintenance by the
Maintenance Oistrlct. There will be a lag time from the original dedication
until the District actually begins the maintenance of the areas.
On certain work program areas where abutting properties will imver be
developed, the District may install the needed improvements as required by the
City Council and malntatn the same,
a a ~-
The plans and specifications for all improvements within the work program
areas to be installed by Lhe developer will be completed by the developer at
their cost for the individual areas to be maintained within the subdivision
and will be approved by the Community Development Department.
Annual Engineer's Reports will be prepared and approved by the City Council
defining the specific work program for each year and its estimated cost. As
development proceeds within the District, the areas to be maintained by the
District will increase and so will the cost; however the number of units will
also increase. The estimated maintenance cost and estimated assessment rate
per unit for the origina! Distrtci and the completed District are tabulated
herein after. The assessment rate is expected to vary year to year as more
areas are annexed to the District until such time as all the properties within
the ultimate district boundary are annexed, after which the assessment rate
should remain constant excluding cost of living increase.
Maintenance Activities
Detail maintenance activities on the areas to be maintained by the District
consist of providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of the
landscaping including: cultivation, irrigation, triawing spraying,
fertilizing or treating for disease or inlury; removal of trimmings, rubbish,
debris and other solid waste; maintenance, repair, energy costs, and
replacement as necessary of all required lighting within the park, greenway,
paseo and trail system; removal of graffiti from walls immediately adlacent to
the cultivated areas; repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any
improvement.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
Yn eN ui11 Fs /n nA h 1hn IH.t..tnt f^ •i i^'1 i ••t
construction exoept for certain nominal areas as mentioned in Sec ti n 3.~~The
cost of any new construction will have negligible effect on the total
assessment of the District due to its scope in comparison with the overall
District work program areas. Based on data from other cities and from the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for Landscape Maintenance Districts and from the
review of proposed work program areas, it is estimated that based on current
dollars, the maintenance cost for assessment purposes, estimated areas to be
maintained and the estimated number of assessment units will be as follows:
A. Original District i
The estimated costs for the original District comprising of Tract No. 13063
are shown below:
Parkway landscaping
(including slopes
d monument walls) 16,600 SF 0 f0.35 55,810.00
Trees 203 EA B f5.00 • 51,015.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST f6,B25.00
a a-3
B. Complete District
The esttnated costs (as current dollars) for the District upon ca~pletion of
all areas within South Etiwanda area are as shown below:
Parkways, trails, greenways, freeway slopes, etc.
1,599,000 SF 8 50.35/SF S 559,650
Neighborhood parks
1,524,600 SF @ f0.35/SF = E 533,510
Eucalyptus Nindrows
5,576 8 5150.00 = S 836,400
Street Trees
2,420 0 f5.00 = f
;I 12,100
;'T4I;76Q
SECTION 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed boundary map and legal description of the Assessment
District are atWChed to this report and labeled "Landscape Maintenance
District No. 8 "Exhibit A". These diagrams are hereby Incorporated into the
text of this report. Precise lot dimensions are included to the referenced
tract maps and Assessor's records. The 0lstrtct will orlginelly be comprised
of Tract No. 13063. The assessment rate of the tract will be as shown in
Section 6, phase one construction. Additional tracts will be annexed into the
District after Its formation. The final configuration of the District will
inciuae the 5outn Etiwenda area, more particularly described as the properties
between Highland Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue and !-
15. A copy of the proposed final 01str1ct No. 8 boundary is attached to this
report as Exhibit "8".
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENTS
A. PHASE ONE CONSTRUCTION (Tract No. 13063)
Maintenance costs for Ahmse One comprising Tract 13063 arc found to be of
specific benefit to all property within the District in accordance with the
following relations:
Totai Annual Cost (Section 41 56,825.00
Assessment Units Summary
Land Use Assessment Untts(Unit Assessment Units
Dwelling Units 73 1 73
TOTAL ASSESSMENT UN1T5 73
~/ ~7
Assessment Rate (6,825.00 ~ 13 = (93.49
Effective Assessments
(93.49 per year or f7.19 per month per dwelling unit
Estf mated assessments are for comparison only. Iktual assessment will be set
by puDiic hearing each year in June and will be based on actual maintenance
expenses and developed land use sumaari es.
8. Camelete District
Maintenance casts for the entire District are foun4 to be of specific benefit
to all property within the District Tn accordance with the following
relations:
Assessment Units Summary Assessment
Land Use Assessment Units/Unit Units
Residential Dwelling Unit 1 U.U. 1
Other Land Uses (eg.
Commercial, InstTWtional) 1.0 acre 2
Total Annual Cost (per Section 4) - f1,941,750
Assessment Units Summary
Land use Units Assessment
Assessment Units/Unit Units
Dwelling Units 4,145 1 4,145
Other Land Uses
e.g. Copgercial,
InstlWtianaU 35 Acres 2 Units 70
TOTAL ASSESSMENT UNITS 4,215
Assessamnt Rates f1,941,760 • 4,215 (460.68
F_i'fective ASSe55ment5
(460,68 per year or f38.39 per month per unit
Estimated assessments are for comparison only. AcWal assessment will De set
by public hearing each year in June and will be based on acWal maintenance
expenses and developed land use summaries.
was
El(R!R •A•
ASSESSNN:NT DIAR'~1RAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8
~HIGHLA.W AYENCIE
II _ _
...... ..yiy. µ
FF~~ l
I~
~~ '-
'
~
`
,,., --
_ lv
~'~
~
'4
'
-• ~i~ ~~
~'~ ~ ,R
t ~y - -- ----- --~
~I I N
°~ ~ ~I~ ii
~" ~ = _~
c y _T_ ~"
C10RIA AYFNUE ea~~~
TRACT NO. 13063 AS RECORDED ON JANUARY 30, 1989 IN BOOK 218, PAGES
10-14 OF TRACE MAPSr IN THE OFFICE OF 'THE COUNTY RECORD, COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA
COUNTY OF !AN BERNARDINO
sTATE OF CALIRORNIA ~ ~.~L~l_~1~11e~
FORMATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
E711~R T
ULTIMwTE DI:TRICT ~OUNdARY
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Novenber 1, 1989
T0: Mayor and Menbers of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cindy Norris, Assoc late Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENT 89-02A
L N request to ameM the nera an
Land Use ap ram Flood Cuntrol to Medium Density
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 1.78 acres of laM located on the west side
of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood
Control Channel, and south of Yivero Street -
APN: 207-022-64.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
request to ame
the eve opment istr cts ap nom ood Control to Medium
Density Residentlal (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 1.78 acres of land located on the west side
of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood
Control Channel, and south of Vivero Street - APN: 201-
m~_ea
I. RECOMMENDATION: On October 25, 1989, the Planning Commission
rata-mme~hat General Plan Pn~e ndment 89-02A and Development
District Pmendment 87-12 be approved by the Cf ty Council to ameM
the General Pian and Development District designations from Flood
Control to Medium Density Residential. If the City Council
concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution and Ordinance of
approval would be appropriate.
tI. ABSTRACT; The City Cou nctl will review the find togs and
con- cTusions of the Planning Commfssion and make a determination on
the proposed General Plan and Development District Amendment
rea.uests, to charwe the land use des ig natf ons from Flood Control to
Medium Density Resf dent tal for the su6~ect property.
[I i. BACKGROUNDNISCUSSION: The Plannlrg Commission reviewed these
app r. at ons at their regularly scheduled meettrg of
October 11, 1989. At this meeting the Commission reviewed the
aa-~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
E.G.M. DEYELOPMENT
GPA 89-02A b DDA 67-12
November 1, 1989
Page 2
proposed amendments for consistency with the General Plan,
potential for traffic impacts, compatibility with surrounding land
uses and the possibility for significant environmental impacts.
A: a result of potential unmitigated significant negative
environmental impacts identified by both the Chaffey Htgh and
Central School Districts, the Planning Commission recommended that
the public hearing be continued to October 25, 1989.
Both the Chaffey Joint Union High School and Central School
Districts have indtcated that the students generated from the
additional residential units would significantly effect their
ability to provide adequate service to the students of the
districts.
As a result, staff and the Commission encouraged the applicant to
work with the districts to find solutions that would mitigate these
potential impacts. The result was the execution of impact
mitigation agreements between the applicant and each district.
Nith these agreements in place, the anticipated impacts will be
mitigated to an insignificant level.
As a result, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a
Negative Declaration and approval of General P1 an Amendment 89-02A
and Development District Amendment 87-12. If additional details
o!c uccucu w,iCei uiuy um ouuve Jixuaaiun, pieaae refer Lu Life
attached Planning Commission staff reports.
IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the conclusions listed fn the
a ac a ann ng ommisston staff reports of October 11, and
October 25, 1989, the City Council can make the following findings
regarding these applications:
1. The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District and
will be adequately protected from flows from the north
and east, as deterained by the Engineering Division as a
result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood
protection measures; and
2. ?he stte is of adequate size and shape to meet all
development standard requirements, as evidenced by the
design of the related development proposal, Tentative
Tract 14263; and
aa~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT
GPA 89-02A b DDA 87-12
November 1, 1989
Page 3
3. The site will have adequate access to accommodate the
proposed use, based on extensive traffic analysis ~~ the
Engineering Division and proposed future roadway
improvements; and
v. The proposed use is compatible with existing and future
land uses in the area, as the proposed site is separated
from any existing residential use by the Cucamonga Creek
Flood Control Channel and Carnelian Avenue to the east
and west, and the existing Cucamonga County Na ter
District reservoir to the north; and
5. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
General Plan, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed
land use designation to satisfy the stated goals,
objectives, and policies contained Tn the text; and
6. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
policies and objectives contained within the Development
Code, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed site to
meet development standards.
7. The proposed amendment will not have adverse impacts on
the environment, public services, nor the surrounding
properties, as evidenced by the conclusions and findings
or the 1nl ttal JtUay Part 11, 8h0 the tmpl emlentatl0n of
mitigation agreements between the property owner and the
Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the Central
School District.
V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
e e a y eport newspaper, and notices sent to property owners
within 3if0 fe~o~fhe project site.
VI, ACTION: If the Giiy Council concurs with the reconmendation o' the
ann ng Conmisslon for approval of General Plan Amendment 89-02A
and Development District Amendment 87-12, then adoption of the
attached Resolution and Ordinance would be appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
" Brad Buly/
City Planner
BB:CN:mlg
~3b
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT
GPA 89-02A & DOA 81-12
Novenber 1, 1989
Page 4
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of October 11, 1989
Planning Commissi c.i Staff Report of October 25, 1989
Planning Commission Minutes from October 11, 1989
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval for GPA 89-02A
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval for DDA 87-12
Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment
89-02A
Ord tna nce of Approval for Development Oistr ict
Amendment 87-12
a3
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
ny~ ,t
DATE: October 11, 1989
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner
Cindy Norris, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERATION RATES
G N I
Since the writing of the GPA 89-02A and 02C reports, additional
information regarding the student generation rates has come to our
attention. Instead of a generation factor of .1562 (students/unit) for
single family development far the anticipated elementary students, a
lower .4252 figure is used 6y Central School Ots tr ict as an overall rate
for the dfstr ict. See attached Central School District letter with
amended note, dated October 9, 1989 from Ingrid Vogel.
Therefore, the fol lowing number of students is now expected from the two
GPA developments:
Rate Students
~r~~no"r n~"fry . ~":r~ ~ nnon ~, r,.w
GPA 898-02A - -
Chaffey High School .15 32 5
Central Elementary .43 32 14
Subtotal - 19
GPA 89-02C
Ch affey High School .15 40 6
Central Elementary .43 40 17
Subtotal - 23
TOTAL - 62
In addition, attached are revised Exhtbits "D" (GPA 89-02C) and "I" (GPA
89-02A) which reflect amended school enrollment percentages for the
revised student generation figures.
~3~-
PLANNING COMM(SS~^4 STAFF REPORT
GPA 89-02A, & 02.. P.C. AGE1aA ITEMS E b [
October 11, 1989
Page 2
Resp lly s Led
Bra Bu r
City ahner
BO:CN:m1g
Attachments: Exhibit "D" -GPA 89-02C
Exhibit "1" -GPA 89-02A
Letter From Central School District
a-3 3
DISTRICT WIDE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT FIGURES
for combined GPA's 69-02A & C
NEW STUDENT51
CURRENT CAPACITY GPA'$1 99- 2 % OF TOTAL
'DISTRICT ENROLLMENT PERMANENT (TEMP). 02A j%]_ 02C u ENROLLMENTS
Central 4281 25123 42633 14 .3 1T .4 .7
Chaffey 4620 3800 4620+ 5 .09 6 .. .2
1 as generated by the anticipated residential project on the sites
of the GPA's.
2 % of currant enrollment-district wide
3 figures from City Master Environmental Assessment-1988
E'xh~b%f'o' (3P/1~9.0ZG~
~' ~ ~ Exh~bi~ 2~ CbpA g9~02A~
FITH:.?.I-DHLt+RII HF'CH. T'EL tla .7lJ-9.14-$?f! Oit 9,59 15 ~38 q0 .004 P.03/03"~
ADMIIdtSIRa~T7ON
Central School Disrrict
9a s; foothJi 91vd. i P.ancho Cucamonga. Caliromia ?t')0 ~ (71u1 909-BSat
July 26, 1989
Hr. T!mo<hy J, as Lk Lr.•
Project Arcn!teat
Plcaaal-oalasu erehi<aeta
9627 Aaven Avenue, 4mte 220
Ranctw Cucamonga, CA 9L7)0
Dur wr. ratkinr.
Fi+tn N. Jove
ellwewlwrewoeNT
in~rid Vo4el
Aaar, wrn .. wetws••
Sbarm L Nsjel
atlT. w-T. , IM •TaYR 1 OM
f am Sn ceeeipe oC your July 26th Teeter deal inq vitR youe pi+nn•d
eomt[uc:!on on en• vent ald• of Grnellan Serene ae the Sneet•ect!on
oC Casneli+n and vlvaro. You a•k•d Cor anavre eo tvo quuelona.
Cueatlon I1: Aill the Central School District and ehe ap•eifie Eloeagry
School vhleh •erve• thin project De ampaeed ae eM tine eh1^
project rill be oeeupted sapprosimately Augurs 19901t
R•aDOnaes rail. 71•ca 6lemaneary School ee rvaa this area. It ie
mvatcrordaa ac tt+e prevent taws and, yu, Lt rill be 1wDacNd
even tureher ae ehe time the vrojece 1• ee.plend.
question 12: Bapd upon eM •peeltla intormetion supplied eancarnlnq CAIa
..+tt nur oro lets have a •lgnlt!cant negaeiva impace
~. ___
upon the diatriet7
Reapona•: Your plane to build ]2 ]-be4room, iy-bath homes v111 have
eigniClcsnt ne9a tiv SmDact upon Che diaezlee.
Ne rich that ve could give you dl if .rent infotmatlon. but w e•n'!. I!
you have any addi tLonal quutlon•. Tat w know.
S incarely,
.~
Erwin b. Jonas
Superintendent
10/9; 09
•p Genera 4on rector Cor l:ont ul School Dl atriet Sn
Single PAa,ily Norco .7542
bi et tics Overall Averags • .a252
/~~ ~~
eouo of leusnu
Nmrr t. 11er Anloni~ 1. Iafal Olbbir AIw Ialh A. Mu1ur And,le TgNi
M1n~Irnr CIw1 AVinNr nrinlw W+.aM
DISTRICT WIDE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT FIGURES
for combined GPA's 89-02A & C
yF.w STUDENT51
CURRENT CAPACITY GPA'$1 69- 2 % OF TOTA:.
DI6TRICT ENROLLMENT PERMANENT (TEMPI. 02A ~_ 02C j~ ENROLLMENTS
Central 4261 25123 42633 14 .3 1T ,4 ,7
Chaffey 4620 3800 4620+ 5 .09 6 .. .2
1 as generated by the anticipated residential project on the sites
of the GPA's.
2 % of current enrollment-district wide
3 figures from City Master EnvSronmenial Assessment-1988
Exh~bif Z ~ CGpA ~'OZA~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 11, 1989
T0: Chairman and Members of Lhe Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Bu?le r, City Pla nrer
BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN PMENDMENT 89-02A
E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the General Plan Land
Use Map from Fl oad Control to Medium Density Residential (8-
14 dwelling units per acre) for approxfmately 1.78 acres of
land located on the west side of Carnelian Avenue, east of
the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, and south of
Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-64.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
87-12 - E.O.M. DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the
Development Districts Map from Flood Control to Medium
Density Residential (8-]4 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 1.78 acres of land located on the west side of
Carnelian Avenue, east of Che Cucamonga Creek Flood Control
Channel, and south of Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-64.
Pn n~rn n~ E. rnirnrluE mn~* :"2E3
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Re nested: Approval of a General Plan and Development
District endment to change the land use designation from
Flood Control to Medium Density Residential.
R. Surrounding ~d Use and Zoning:
North - Existing single family (pro pc sed multi-family, TT
14263) and Cucamonga County Na ter District water
tank; Medium Density Residential (8-]4 dwelling units
oer ac re i.
South - Vacant with existing drain channel; Flood Control.
East - Carnelian Avenue and existing single family; Low
Density Residential (2-4 dwe 111ng units per acre).
West - Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and existing
single family residences; Fl oad Control and Low
Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre).
2-3 ~
PLANNING COMMISSION SL r REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02A b DDA 81-12 - E.G.M DEVELOP.
October 11, 1989
Page 2
C. General Plan Desinnations:
Project Site - Flood Control
North - Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
ac rel
South - Flood Control
East - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre!
West - Flood Control and Low Density Residential (2-4
dwelling units per acre)
D. Site Characteristics: The subject property is vacant with Lhe
exception of a landscaped parkway of Eucalyptus trees and
shrubs directly adjacent to the existing curb and flood
control channel along Carnelian Avenue. The parcel has a
varying topography with the majority of the site having a
grade varying from 2 to 5 percent while the portion located at
the southeast end has slopes varying from 11 to 20 percent
adjacent to the flood ton trot channel.
Directly to the north are three (3) existing older single
family homes which are to be removed as part of the proposed
development for Tentative Tract 14263. Further north is an
existing water tank and approximately four (4) single family
homes all which currently front onto Carnelian Avenue (see
Exhi hit "f."l. The land north of tho ca hnmoc hae hoar
developed with multi-family units. To the east are existing
single family homes which rear onto Carnelian Avenue, while to
the west, are existing single family homes separated from the
subject property by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel
(approximately 150 to 200 feet wide).
I[. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study,
Part t, and the responses from the school districts and completeA
the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and,
except for sc hoot-impaction, has found Lhat no other significant
adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of the
proposed General Plan Amendment 89-02A and Development District
FVnendment 87-12.
Both the Cha ffey High $c hoof and Central St pool Dis *.r is is have
indicated toot there will 6e significant negative impact on their
ability to provide services as a result of the proposed
amendments and planned residential project. The potential
student generation for each district as a result of the proposed
amendment will 6e as follows:
a-38"
PLANNING COkS1I SSI0N Sl. ~ REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02A S DDA 81-12 - E.G .M DEVELOP.
October 11, 1989
Page 3
rate students
students/unit x units ' = generated
'ha ffey High School District .15 32 5
,.e ntral School District .75 32 24
TOTAL 29
*Ba sed on a total of 32 units as requested in the development
proposal, Tentative Tract 14263.
District-wide school enrollment figures are attached in
Exhibit "I".
In response to the district's concerns, staff had requested that
the applicant work with the school district towards developing
agreements to provide appropriate mitigation measures. As of
this date, Lhe applicant has been able to come to an agreement
with the Chaffey Joint High St hool District, but an appropriate
mitigation measure has not been reached with Central School
Ois tr ict. Staff is currently in contact with the school district
to aid in reaching some form of agreement.
Therefore, as adequate mitigation toward resolution of potential
s ionific ant impacts has not been reached, staff is una hle fn make
the determination in favor of preparation of a Negative
Declaration.
III. LAND 115E ANALYSIS:
A. Background: On June 25, 1984, the subject property was
declared surplus by the San 8e rna rdfno County Board of
Supervisors, as improvements to the Cucamonga Creek F1aod
Control Channel had been completed and the easements were no
longer necessary,
On March 8, 1989 the Planning Commission reviewed a request
from Burgundy Creek Ltd. for a proposed Deve to Anent District
Amendment from Flood Control to Medium Density Residential.
The Planning Commission found that due to the unusual site
configuration and potential traffic hazards on Carnelian
Avenue, that a determination on land use could not be made
until further information was presented with the application,
including a development proposal and traffic analysis.
Add it tonally, the Dlanning Commission determined that a
General Plan Amendment would be necessary to change the Land
use from Flood Control to Medium Density Re siden ttal.
X39
PLANNING COMMISSION S1..F REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02A & DDA 87-12 - E.G.M 6EV ELOP.
October I1, 1989
Page 4
The Planning Conmissi on also raised concerns regarding master
planning of the subject parcel with properties to the north
with regard to access. However, staff has determined that
this would not be possible as the property located direr. tly
r,n rth of proposed ?e^.ta tive ?ract 1.42E3 continues to be
retained by the Cucamonga County LJa ter District. Recording to
district representatives, the reservoir on this site functions
as an integral part of their system and it is not anticipated
that it will 6e eliminated. Additionally, a berm is located
along the south end of the property which functions as a levee
to protect against overflows and access would not be possible.
8. Traffic Analysis and Generation Rates: As a result of the
proposed development project, the Engineering Division has
conducted an extensive traffic analysis of the proposed site,
and found that the resulting traffic can be appropriately
accommodated as a result of future roadway improvements.
Carnelian Avenue, which is a designated secondary arterial, is
projected to have traffic levels of up to 26,000 vehicle trips
per day. As a result, access to Carnelian fs limited and the
street will be designed with an ultimate right-of-way of 88
feet, (64 feet of pavement width). Additionally, to reduce
potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians,
a rinhh_*nrn larva ill ho ;AeA a,,. ~h 4., -•
the proposed driveway aligned with Vivero Street.ly .r,.~~~. ~~~V
A traffic analysis, prepared by O'Rourke Engineering,
indicates that due to existing tra ffit levels on Carnelian, a
stop light will be necessary at the Vivero intersection to
help reduce speeds and thereby reduce the number of accidents
between Base Line and Foothill. Additionally, the study
concludes that, "this intersection is warranted based on
existing Conditions, not a5 a result of the proposed project."
A comparative analysis of traffic generation rates as a result
of the project for the low (L), Low Medium (LM) and Medium (M)
land use categories was prepared by staff as shown in Exhibit
"D". It was found that the traffic levels would vary
sl+ghtl y, eith the LM designaticn tend tng W generate a
greater amount of traffic (240 vtpd) than either the L (180
vtpd) or M (195 vtpd) categories.
Therefore, although traffic generation rates for different
land uses will vary somewhat, the resulting traffic levels
will be relatively mfnor in comps rlson with levels predicted
along Carnelian Avenue as a whole. The street will be
designed to carry the projected traffic load at an adequate
level of service which will mitigate the proposed traffic
concerns.
a~~
PLANNING COMMISSION 51,..F REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02A 8 DOA 81-]2 - E.G.M OEV ELOP.
Octoher 11, 1989
Page 5
C. Land Use Anal vsis: The proposal to designate the subject
property as Medium Density Residential rather than Low or Low
Medium is consistent with the policies contained in the
General Plan with regard to loc at tonal and compatibility
considerations.
The General Plan states that the Law (L) and Low Medium (Lt1)
Residential designations are intended to encourage lower
intensity single family housing. The Low Medium Density
designation is described as one which "encourage(s) greater
housing diversity without changing the single family character
of the surrounding residential cha rat to r." As a result, this
designation can be used as a transitional housing type or as a
buffer from higher intensity uses.
In contrast, the Medium Density Residential designation is
considered a more appropriate use "adjacent to parks and other
open spaces, along transit routes and major and secondary
thoroughfares, and near activity centers, such as recreational
centers, libraries, she Aping centers, and entertainment
areas." It can serve as a buffer and can better accommodate
impacts as a result of traffic and noise.
Oue to the location of the proposed project adjacent to the
flood [nntrnl channel with r oe f~~~,~.n _ .~ :,
and Carnelian Avenue, which r isc a designated ^secondary
arterial, a higher intensity use is mare appropriate as
opposed to one Which would encourage a single family
character.
Add itiona7ly, as the project site is separated from any
adjacent residential develo Anent by some form of edge or
harrier, the higher density development will not cause a
negative impact on surrounding existing uses.
IV. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANALYSIS: State law requires that the
Development District, i.e., Zoning Ordinance, be consistent with
the General Plan (Section 65860, Government Codej. If findings
can be made to warrant the General Plan Pmendment to Medium
Density Residential, then Similar find inq should also be made
regarding the Development District Amendment change to Medium
Density Residential.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the General Plan and
Geve opme~ nt District Amendments, the Commission would have to
determine that the change would promote the land use goals and
policies of the General Plan and not be materially detrimental to
the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse
environmental impacts. Following are the findings that are
necessary:
~/
PLANNING COMAISSION Sl r REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02A d DDA 81-12 - E.G.M DEVELOP,
October I1, 1989
Page 6
1. The property is suitahle for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District
and will be adequately protected from flows from the
north and east, as determined by the Engineering
Division as a result of hydrologic analysis and orn po sad
flood protection measures; and
2. The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all
development standard requirements, as evidenced by the
design of Lhe related development proposal, Tentative
Tract 14253; and
3, The site will have adequate access to accommodate the
proposed use, based on extensive traffic analysis by the
Engineering Division and proposed future roadway
improvements; and
4. The proposed use is compatible with existing and future
land uses in the area, as the proposed site i5 separated
from any existing residential uses by the Cucamonga
Creek Flood Control Channel and Carnelian Avenue to the
east and west, and the existing Cucamonga County Water
District reservoir to the north; and
5. The oro oa sed amendments am '.n rnn fn rmanre with the
General Plan, as evidenced by the ability of the
proposed land use designation to satisfy the stated
goals, objectives, and policies contained in the text;
and
6. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
policies and objectives contained within the Development
Code, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed site
to meet development standards.
However, the proposed amendments may result in
significant negative impacts on the ability of the
Central School District to provide adequate service as
evidenced by the fact that an appropriate mitigation
agreement has no? been rear he^_ between the pro perLy
owner and the District.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public
hearing in The Daily Report_ newspaper, the property posted with a
supplemental large notification sign, and notices sent to all
property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
~~
PLANNING COMMISSION S1. REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02A b DOA 87-12 - E.G.M DEVELOP.
October il, 1989
Page 7
VIiI. RECOMMENDATION: As a result of the potential negative impact to
school services, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
conduct a public hearing and consider all written and oral input
'n considering the following determinations:
A. That the General Plan and Development District Pmendments be
denied, based upon the fact that no definitive mitigation
measure is available to resolve the resulting impact on the
Central School 6istr ict. If the Commission favors this
option, staff would recommend that the denial be "without
prejudice" so that the applicant may re-apply at any time if a
mitigation measure or solution is found; or
B. That the General Plan and Development District Amendments be
continued until a more definitive agreement is presented,
which clarifies the mitigation measures on the school impact
issue; or
C. That the Planning Conmiss ion Bete rmine that the potential
impact as a result of the General Plan and Development
District lvnendments, of approximately 29 addi tf onal students
(elementary and high school), is not sufficient to result in a
significant impact on school services. Nith such a
determination, the Planning Commission can recommend a
w<e>Non non >.>r:r" >nn .6e9 .:d"r ..: CP".
--~~-~ -.. -. ^y ,.,.,.
DDA applications.
Res lly suh 'tSRd,
Brad u le
City Pla er
BB;CN:ko '-
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "8" - General Ptan
E zhibft "C" - Location Map
Exhibit "D" - Traffic Ana ly515
Exhibit "E" - Proposed Site Plan
Exhibit "F" - Letters of July 26 and August 22, 1989
from Central School District
Exhibit "G" - Letter of July ll, 1989 from Chaffey Joint
Union High School District
Exhibit "N" - Letter of September 21, 1989 from
Applicant
Exhibit "I" - School Enrollment Figures
~3
Vicinity Map
N.T.S.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA trEM;
PLANNING DIVISION ~~ Vl~j`~~T N
EXHIBIT: SCALE: ~
~~~
''~'~~d
.~
__ :~
:~
~..,
•
_
'
.
Golf -
+
`
_
E
_
;nurse : -
~
.
...
I
~
;~ ;
'~
.
_
...:
. ;.
•:
• ;s
:~
•:
••
~:•
.~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM;
PLANNING DIVISION TmE: Grtn~i'aL 9/an N
EXHIBIT: ~j SCALE:
~J
:;:;:a
:~
,~
:; ::~
-.•
Subject
parcel
~...
a ~s
~`.~ ~-a.'!~ Pel erode
\ .f
V
\ ~~~ M~
~~ ~ ~
,\\ V
7
~\\~ ~
iJl
~.~
R
l.~ I ~
$---1
~ ~_ ,
__
.a- .
i,
~-----J,
t ~ ~~ •M•
~' ~~ r-r i_.ri
cl ~~ ~4r^ ~ r~
l .l
\ ~ +\ ~ ~
\ \\ / 1
(~) ~
r t
8 yCJ ~\~~~
~ e\
~, S ~C ~
..
\[
\ ~`
~' '~
~\\
I!IJF /~VF
r
r~ `
J
_;
a _
LJ h f
1, ,
.,
LJ
.:' _
= L
F- ._ SITE_
{
~ -
L
. ~
,,
;C ~\. -
.,
', ~ i
. `~
rr., .
,~:
r ~ rl, ~ r ~i
LJ ~ L~L].1R_r
j>v {~
J ^) \-w,~
l~ ,, II -
~11 Vr'1 `J C ~.~
i;
4
{~ ~ r'~ r~
I~p -l l Q l J L J
~p~ Y
5 " ' ~
f~~
C r'i
aaHH l J
~4l _
~~~ ~ f' r. C~ <~~
= J
/~
~~ f~no,~ opn/'eB
J
ri ,
~I L-~--- l 1 ` ' JI ..
I ~1IIQ
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM:
PLANNING DIVISION ~m.E: LOGQ.fY0I1 ~'Ylatl N
EXHIBIT: SCALE:
a~a~
EXHIBIT •D'
Traffic 6e nera tion Analysis
Staff has conducted a comparative analysis of the traffic generation
rates far the proposed project site based upon possible differing land
use sate^orie s.
The generation rates for the Low (L) and Low Medium (LM) categories were
based on average lot size. Additi onalty, staff assumed a single family
(including duplex) type of development to occur in the Low Medium
Category, rather than a clustered development
L 18 units x 10.00* = 180 {vt pd)
LM 24 units x 10.00* = 240 (v tpd)
M 32 units x 6.10* = 195 (vtpd)
As can be seen; the Low Medium category would tend to generate a greater
amount of traffic than either the L or M categories. It has generally
been found that single family type developments tend to generate higher
rates of traffic due to the larger number of persons per household.
However, traffic is generally mare concentrated from multi-family
projects as a result of limited access points.
* Average daily trip generation obtained from the Ge re rai Ptan
Master Environmental Assessment.
~ I ~\ \ \ I\ ..........._ I
\ _
L .__ y~ (-
LL' ~ ~i
~- : ~'.
\'\ r.wa. \\n• r
it\%
s,~ \.. ~ .~°~
,.
IBO i6~~4a.~. ~~,
,...~ ~_.
i. __^ _ . _ _. _
• ~ J ' ~~ j ._.__.
j __ I~
. _.
_ I _ -
y, ~_ i!
i
-I A V
,~ .l .
=lil
G
of
c ^ ~\
CJ n
x l
87 ~
)sca io
log
Po r. Lol
- ..w 13
. _. h/B 2/~6>
es so ea
~~~ 0 III ' ]I II'
S'~
r i
. ~~ ~
17 W w...... r .,.... ~ ~ Swccr nwrcn p ~ rlr
D 1 j \ •~~n.u.- ~~ I
qq 1
4 IS a \ .......- ^~F 7. I I y-~ I t n0
r "_
i ? I 19 ~ \ 'f, 1
' _.,~
1 O
I~ va 13 a ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~.
e _ r O
-. •Pr d 99 .... --- - .~... G
's ~ lay It _ ~l ,. ••. ,. I o 4
L ~~ 3c I]IL IZ \'~, ~ A
I
~'+0 9 \ c•4 \ ~' oO
~Q9 ~
Pi. ~ u \ \\ I ~1 5 mo -
~ m
^~.SI' bl„ u s C\
I' )r'L O
..Y ~., YY~~ ` \ \ X11 C
~7
1
- N
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM:
PLANNING D[ViSiON 7m.E:~DO~rd J~i~L P~a~f ~
(E~XHQIBIT: ~ SCALE:
/ V
C¢ntral School District
9457 foothill Blvd. f Rancho Cucamonga, California 91710 ! (7111 989~85a1
Suly 26, 1989
Mr. Timothy J. Watkins
Project Architect
Pi to ssi-Da lmau Architects
9627 Haven Avenue, Sui ce 220
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Watkins:
.,DMMISTRATION
£rsin N. Jones
aVR CRIMTCMOeryT
Ingrid Vogel
asst .suer „euarNCae
S6arov L Nagel
•ieT.{YPT.,IN{TRV CTION
.!'. :..~
I am in receipt of your ,luly 26th letter dealing with your manned
construction on the west sitle of Carnelian Street at the intersection
of Carnelian and Vive rc. You asked Eor answers to two questions.
Question I1: will the Central School District and the specific elementary
School which serves this project be lmpected at the time this
project will be occupied (app [o[imately August 19901?
Response: Valle Vi ata elementary School serves ehis area. It is
overcrowded et the present tine and, yes, i. •..•i 11 Se imna ctad
even Earths[ at [he lime the project is completed.
Question t2: Based upon [he specific information supplied conce rninn chic
p rojecc, will our project nave a significant negative impact
upon the distri eta
Response: lour plans to build 12 7-bedroom, 2'.-bath homes •.+ill have a
significant negative impace upon the district.
We wish that we could give you different inf ormatlon, tut wn can't. if
you have any additional questions, iet us know.
Sincerely,
~1 i
A L~
Erwin N, done5
Superintendent
9n
~~~
soon of r~renls
Nmn 1. fla, AMRnu I auR~R IIeLLm M~b~~
. .nm ii~.l n,•„r...
A n'h 4 Move dmlrrx In lur
Central School District
9457 Foothill Blad. ~ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 r 17111 9898541
August 22, 1989
Mr. Timothy '. Wa ikies, Project .Architect
Pita ssi-Dalmau ARC hitects
9267 Naven Avenue, Su>_te 220
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173G
Dear Mt. Watkins:
ADMINISTRATION
k".rwin N. .lanes
9UPf NIMTCMaCNT
Ingrid Vogel
as sT.avPT.,eaalNC as
Sllaroo [~ Nagel
.as sT.suPT.,INST nVCT:oN
In response to youc August 14, 1989 letter, 1 am provid:nq Sou wl th add iti ona!
information you requested concerning the ampact of your Burgundy Creek Project
upon Central Schaal District,
You asked for answers to six questions:
Question 111: What is the current enrollment and design capacity of the aEfec led
elementary school, (Does the design capac wy include portable unlcs?1
and the projected enrollment at the project's completion?
Response: The Valle Vista Clements ry School is designed EoC 5]8 pupils and
presently houses in excess of 620, In a recent review we found
no adequate space to house another portable, thus, we transferred
Ile 1'n annrho• arFnnl n mne~ nn rnl l...
Although we do have portables on [he grounds tc is the only elementary
school ape ra ttng without a 1lb racy and a ae mnuter canto: due co the
lack of space.
Quea ii on N2: What is the student generation factor used by the dtstr ut tc
Bete rm the the number of students expected from your pco 7ect'
Raspon se: The student qe~e ration factor used ty the district is .";%2 per unt<.
Question 1i: Will your pro 7ect impact the district's ability to nrovide adequate
service to resldencs7 IE se, under :fiat ;andittons can the dtstrtcc
provide adequate service'
pespan,_, 'foe -- our _.__. .111 fu. .^. e.r .,v r. r..; .,,, .. a; ...,ra.,. -.e.c ..
sc hool.V We can pcovtde ad~1q~':a ce se rvl ce :~E ve had addtctonal class-
room space.
Question A4: Does the disc: ict use, or have plans ro use, I•n rtat~le ~las ;room,
to handle the increased student unrollmwlrs7
ResPOn ae: lie have portablu class rooms un c•~c ry s:cr ul nc~ ar n,ml .I::;'r: .: t„
ILl nd 1C the CVCr tp,'1't`aSlnq =,. 1111 C11r Onro1. ,pot.
asp
an un nr ler+ttrs
Mann 1. flnv Anlnnu I IluKer IlrLlnr NJr, Aulh A M,na r Jnd,en lu lw
r.,....l.m n, ., • .,. ~,..
Mr. Timothy S. Watkins
Page Two 8/22/89
question !5: Dues the district have plans to construct additional school
facilities, and iE so, what is the projected ci me frame and Eunding
sources?
Response: We are presently complei ing the third and final phase of Rear Gulch
School. We are currently working on State applications for three
additional schools -- Terra Vista II for 1991, Ruth Musser Middle
School Eor 1992, and the Coyote Canyon Elementary School Eor 199_
to [epla ce the temporary school huili by Le:+is Homes. 'Che Eunding
source is the Slate of Ca liEOrnie and a< present no Eunds are avail-
able. However, we hope to be funded if the voters approve a school
building bond issue at the next election.
question 16: Does the district have a comprehensive master plan or 5-year
action plan? IE so, what do tney entail?
Reaponse: Yes, we do have a comprehensive master plan and our 5-pear action plan
is described in Response AS above.
I tcuet this is an edequete response to your concerns.
Sincerely,
>,
Ingrid Vogel
Assistant Su pe rantendent
jj
r" -Z
Chaffey Joint Union High School District
211 WEST FIFTH STREET, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 917624698 Q14) 9PB-8511
,,,~
~=
SUPEANTEHOENT OF BCI,OOIa
Oaan E. SmM~M~
•58OLNTE SUPERNTENOEHT
INSTHVLiION
Bma B Wrmon
•83,8T1NT SUPEHIHTENDENi
PEg54NHEL
Owap E Cap
BO1g0 MEMSEq$
galnMXn E Mrnby
Om C Manm
flaymaM J $a,rro
CXaUn J Unalby
' GmM W Wdl
J ulr 1'.r lses
Pitassi-Da lmau, Architects
3267 Haven Ave., Ste. 223
fiancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
ATTt7: Timothy Watkins
Rfi': Hurgundy Creek, Tentative Tract 14263
The above-referenced project, consistlnd of 32 townhomes, is
situated in the Alta Loma Hi¢h School attendance area.
The current combined capacities of Alta Loma and Gtiwanda Hidh
Schools is 3800. Their combined erLa•ollmant is 4620. Ttle ova rage
is housed in trailer classrooms; however, the sarvice facilities
(cafeteria, gym, guidance and administrative offices, parking,
access, library etc.) are woefully inadequate for that num,ter of
students.
O)' UCYYC„IVGa, n ,av ,I,Ya u u.~ ,.a
projacts et bothJschools, ainc rearing their combined eapacitY to
4950. However, our projections ir.d irate that by September, 1990,
the combined enruliments of the two schools will Le 5550. W,:
still will have to use trailer classrooms, and the campuses still
will be seriously overcrowded.
The Chaffey District has a new high school (Rancho Cucamonga Hidh
School) for that area on the drawing boards. Wa have applied for
State fundlnd, but the State ilas no money for the project. A
State bond issue ~ proposed for cha June, 1230 l:aLlo t. If it
gets on the ballot and if the issue is approved snl:t if the Chaf-
fey District receives some of that m.:ney, perhaps wrm could upon
Rancho Cucamonga Hrgh £chool in i~3~.
- 'hu ,ccaai tY ~..° -tat f• ~di..d Ran .1. C••. ,,,.; r.ga Hi eft
School, the Chaffey District _ compelled ~tavinf ortq you chat
your projE:at will have a sLgc:fi.ant n.gatiw imp:.ct up,.'n Lha
District ar.d that the Chatf ey Gi.;trict sz._s no ce rt,ain re aaf .~f
that impac tir.n coming fr.,m Lh~ Ccacc
~~
1nNJ111E .11 II II W.1 r ,,Ilalll ( al X rl I IINF /r 1X 111 • Ir.,r i i i., •,111.1 , ~X rll lr r ~rlr Ilr .r.N~ • ,X111 I 'IX 1Y
Exhih)f U
While the Chaffey District does levy developer fees pursuant to
Government Code Sections 53060 and 65335, those Pans fall far
short of producing enough money to build the scktool facilities
needed in Rancho Cucamonga. 'Cha District, thereYore, will and
hereby does recommend that the City ait her
(1) Deny approval oP Tentative Tract 14263, or
(2) Condition the approval of Tentative Tract 142C3
upon E.G.M. Development or any assignee's not being permitted to
pull permits and start construction in that tract until after
State Pundind for Rancho Cucamonga Sigh School is scoured and a
contract awarded for the construction of that high school, sls
(3) Condition the approval of Tentative Tract 14263 upon
E.C.M. Development's partir_ipation in a Me11o Roos Community
Facilities District or some other appropriate school facilities
funding program beyond the current developer fees levied by the
District.
'ncere~,
STEPFIEN L. SUTTEFS
Director
Business Services
SLB/sb
cc: Brad Buller
a-53 G
FI :'>I-.. ~_, ! RF'CH. TEL .. ~ td-SV .7-5::
EEP 21 'B5 lb~3b Ir;> 12'.ELGF IT iiF• fq~, fl P'
S epbember 31, 1989
Mr. Brad _uller
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
P. o, Bcx 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 5173U-OBO7
RE: Traot nJ. 14263
Deer Mr. Huller:
P. 2. i
This letter ie intended to voice our concern over the policies
that era being Qeveloped with regard to the obtaining of Will
9a rue letters from the Chaffey and central school districts.
I would like to state that we have tried to adhere to every
request the city has made of us. we have striven to make our
project as high in quality and its submittbl package ea complete
as possible. our yoal is vory similar to the olty's with regard
to aesthetics and overall public acceptance and appeasement.
v
crowding oP the schoola he• evidently led to the need oC a more
tt ~inrtnnf nntl~rr n.+ will cwrvw 7r.+,~._.-.. ~w ..
~ r: y-cGvt J( rvua
staff-we contacted both districts in order•~to-ootein information
about our prof ace's effeot on the schools. Through our
communication .with the districts we have learned of a pending
t4allo-Roos which is in process to develop another school.
Chaffey has an ngraement which states you either pay an
increaasd tea or enter into the assessment district. We have
agreed to have our approval conditioned to meet that reryuirement.
I would hope the city could Work a similar arrangement with
central school district.
A project such as ours can not pay the school lass until ws
record a construction loan, eanF:s will not record construction
loans without approvals. Thus, we gat caught in the middle it
they must ba paid in advance oP approvals. Our project Will
incur at least S80,000.oo in smhool fees plus whntavar ineraase
ti,e districts decide on. A prof act o1 oUr •12• normally Only
requires $zoo,ooo.oo in onpitel •o you can sae the tramaneoua
impact vhlch would occur it the lass needed to b• paid 6e[ore we
could obtain finanoinq.
a~~
~xhlht f H
r1 I. I .._~„ _ .,
.,~_... EL :,.714 ... i _, a.. .-.l F'...:ii,
.(
SEP 21 '67 It%At H;5 L~L•: LL kI IT Cw fFL. @AC F'.3~3
~ I implore the olty on our behal f, as well as other smell builders,
to vary much took to conditioning approvals besed oh the
developer entering into an agreement with the district before his
map can record. The alternative of advanced ,payment e+ould
finenolelly ruin emnll builders.
Slneerely+
Je[[rey s, Aurum
Vice President
JSB/pd
2s5 N
DISTRICT WIDE SCNUOL ENROLLMENT FIGURES
for rom6ined GPA's 89-02A & D
NEW STUDENTS=
CIIRRENT. CAPACITY GPA'S2 09- 7 % OF TOTAL
DISTRICT ? NROLLMENT PERMANENT (TEMP)y 02A ~ 02C ~ ENROLLMENTS
Central 4201 25123 42633 24 .5 30 .7 1.3
Chaffey 4G20 3000 4820+ 5 .09 G ,. ,2
1 as enerated b the antici ated residential
g y p project on the sites
of the GPA's.
2 % of current enrollment-district wide
3 figures from City Master Environmental Assessment-1908
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM:
PLANNING DIVISION TTPLE:.~•%u^a/ t~Irn!lnrr~nJ N
EXHIBIT: '/, ~ SCAIE:
~J
he ~Q with Cau nsel that a corporation would no e.
Motion: Mo Tolstoy, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the Re lion
approving Enviro 1 Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map with
modifications to re a recorded reciprocal access a sin to nonce
agreement in lieu of a Ho s Association, installation a common area
landscaping prior to occupancy parcel, and replac of the ez ist ing
fences with a shared masonry wall a east, nort d west boundaries of
the pro,lec t. Motion carried by the fo vot
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RLAK ESL EY, CN]j>KII~NI EL, TOL STOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CONMiSSION ER S: NBERGER
+ .. + +
8:45 P.M. - Ina Commission Recessed.
_c
- Planning Commission Reconvened.
I.
V GICLV rI'1 CI\I - It rC1IVCaL LV CIIS IN LIIC
ontr~Tto Medium Density Residentia
approximately 1.78 acres of land lc
Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek
Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-64.
i dwelling units per acre) for
on the west side of Carnelian
Control Channel, and south of
~.
K.
u evew rmcni - r reque sc co amens me ueve wpmenc u\scnccs map rrom rwuc
ontro to Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for
approximately 1.78 acres of land located on the west side of Carnelian
Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, and south of
Vivero Street - APN: Z07-022-64.
n resiaennan suoaiyy@~on one aesngn review or az conaommmm un\cs on
3.35 acres of land to the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units
per acre) and the Flood Control District (a proposed Medium Residential
District), located on the west side of Carnelian at Vivero Street -APR:
207-022-54 and 64. As satiated with this pro,lett fs General Plan Pme Mment
89-02A, Development District Amendment 87-12, and Tree Removal Permit 89-
SR.
The staff report was presented by Cindy Norris, Associate Planner, and Tom
Grahn, Assistant Planner.
Planning Commission Minutes -9- October 11, 1989
OJ
Commissioner Chitiea asked if there is a sidewalk connecting the proposed
protect to the tommerctal area to the north.
Mr. Grahn replied there is not.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if the sidewalk extended north on the eastern side
of Carnelian.
Russ Maguire, City Engineer, replied that it does.
Commissic^er Bl akes ley asked why there was not a trail access.
Mr. Grahn stated the Resolution requires the applicant to prepare plans
add ressirg the access point leading to the west property line; however, there
currently is no agreement between the City, the Flood Control Oistr is t, and
the Corps of Engineers for an extension of the Regional Trail.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if anyone was pursuing the extension with the Flood
Control District and the Corps of Engineers.
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that ante the Alta Loma Channel
Ag reenent is approved, the Ctty plans to prepare a master agreement for the
rest of the Cfty.
Commissioner Blakesley asked where access was being contemplated.
Mr. Grahn stated it was ,lust south of the recreation center along the west
protect boundary.
Commissioner Tolstoy concurred with the necessity for the turning lane, but
i'elt the parkway along Carnelian would lose a lot of its charm.
Mr. Grahn stated the protect was canditfoned to require conformance with the
Carnelian Beautification Protect.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Pete Pitassi, Pi tassi Oalmau Architects, stated the protect site was dlff icult
to work with because of its shape. He proposed single family attached housing
(duplexes) with an A/8 pattern instead of an A/A reverse pattern. He stated
they also proposed twq_buildings for diversification. He stated the
deceleration lane world decrease the frontage along Carnelian, but they
proposed landscaping in that }ocatfon. He stated they received correspondence
from Central School District late this afternoon and the developer had agreed
to the proposed fee. He reduested that the protect he approved with a
condition added that the developer agree with the School District mitigation
Treasures prior to issuance of building permits. He was concerned regarding
Ergfneering condition (8), and wanted to confirm that it referred to orb and
gutter improvenents only.
Planning Commission Minutes -10- October I1, 1989
asp
Jeff 8urvm, 6057 Oella Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, asked how the in-lieu fee was
calculated. He stated their traffic study concluded that a signal would be
needed at the corner of Vivero and Carnelian even without the proposed project
and he, therefore, requested reimbursement at 100K.
Mr. Maguire stated that even if a traffic signal were required without this
project, the ex istirg street configuration is only a "T" and the signal would
only have three Legs. Therefore, the developer was being asked to pay for the
forth leg, particularly since the project would have no alternate access. He
stated that in the past the Cf ty has required larger developments to install
and pay f•r entire signals. He further stated that withal the project, the
signal was not a high priority, and it would be several years before
instal cation.
Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the formila on condition (8)
called for standard fair market value of full improvements; i.e., curb,
gutter, sidewalks, and street lights. He stated the applicant would normally
build the improvements, but the open channel needs to remain to pick up water
off Carnelian.
Mr. Burum stated he agreed with fair market value, but that on the
u nderg rouMirg in-lieu fee, the charge is approximately 5OX higher than actual
costs.
Mr. Hanson stated that the nu~ers for utility undergrounding are generated by
the utility companies, but the City can use fair market value for the other
improvements.
Mr. Maguire stated that the applicant would wbmtt full and co~rlete plans
along with estimates of value and cost. He stated Engineering would loon
estimate how much it would cost to build the improvements later.
Mr. Burvm felt they were perhaps getting to the point where the project would
not pencil out. He said that because their traffic study indicated the City
should have a traffic signal at Vivero and Carnelian even without the addition
of their project; he felt that their payment of the normal systems fee should
be adequate, Instead of requ irirg them to pay for 25% of the traffic signal.
Chairman Mc Niel stated that when the project was last reviewed, the primary
concern was the traffic ft world generate and he felt the developer should
have anticipated the pos;sjble need for a signal.
Mr. Bu rum stated that since the sfgnal is currently nonexistent, he felt the
City should work with the developer and be wSlling in pay for the signal.
Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing wes closed.
Ralph Hanson, stated the developer was requesting that their Parcel Map 6e
coMitioned to pay the dollar amount mentioned 1n the letter before the
Commission from the Central School Ofstrict, but state law does not allow the
Commission to hose wch a condition on the project. He stated a private
Planning Commission Minutes -11- October 11, 1989
d
agreement between the developer and the School District might be appropriate.
He suggested if the Commission wished to approve the project thfs evening,
they might add language to Planning Condition (5) to state that if the
developer and any affected School District arrived at a private agreement, the
condition would be deemed nu'.1 and void.
Commissioner Ch itiea felt it was essential to have some sort of agreement for
school mitigation. She co~limented Mr. Pitassi on the si*_e plan and
architectural deslg n. She was concerned about the traffic into and out of the
project, and the only access being from Carnelian. She felt that the traffic
generated by the project will greatly affect the need for the signal and
there fore 'elt the test of the far-way signal was partly a responsibility of
the developer. She supported the project with a signal, a school mitigation
agreement, and Engineering's conditions.
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed that he could not support the project without a
signal. He was concerned abort the breakup of the beautification area and
suggested the project be conditioned to pay particular attention to the
landscaping that the deceleration lane removes.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that staff very carefully reviewed the
removal and replacement of trees. He agreed that there should be a greater
focus on a denser landscaping in the area of the deceleration lane.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if it should be added as a condition, or if it
would be sufficient to reflect the desire in the Minutes.
Mr. Maguire suggested adding a condition requiring review by the City Engineer
and Cfty Planner to be w re the beautification theme is reestablished and the
establishment of any additional landscaping or tree easements necessary to
assure control of the landscaping.
Barrye Hanson stated that the Resolution called for the sidewalk to be
property-line adjacent, separated from the curb. He asked if the Commission
was in agreement.
It was the consensus of the Commission that if possible the sidewalk should
wind through the trees.
Chairman McNiel commended the developer on the project's sensitivity to .good
site planning and desigrl~
Mr. Buller stated staff wou14 prefer a continuance to allow an agreement an
school impaction to be in-hard before recommending approval. He sold that
order state law the most appropriate time to consider school impaction would
be durfrg the General Plan review rather than with the Map.
Commissioner Blakesley stated his concerns had already been stated and he
agreed with the proposed modifications to the conditlons.
Planning Commission Minutes -12- October 11, 1989
~~
Chairman Mt Niel reopened the public hearing to allow the applicant to comment
on continuance.
Mr. Pitassi stated that because of financing, they c'id not want to delay the
project. He said he was willing to pay the fee, and he would like to have the
Map conditioned and the project approved.
Chairman McN iei stated that the School District letter requested the City
impose a fee requirement and the City could not legally impose that fee.
Mr. Pitassi felt the City could iingose the requirement of an a3 regime nt on the
Map.
Ralph Hanson stated the law is very specific about what the City can impose.
He said it would not be a valid condition for the City to ingose.
Mr. Buller stated that because of advertising requirements the first available
City Council meeting world be Nove~er 1. He said the project cold be
continued to the October 25 Planning Commission meeting to allow time for the
applicant to present the mitig of ion agreement; and if the project were then
approved, it could still be fcnwarded to Cfty Council on November 1.
Therefore, no time would be lost if action cculd 6e taken on October 25.
Mr. Pitassi stated that he couldn't sign the mitigation agreement without
approval of the map. He said the Chaffey High School District had agreed that
as soon as the City gave approvals for the project, the School District
agreement cau ld then be signed.
Mr. 9uller stated that the Oe renal Plan Amendment and the Oe ve topment District
Agreement cold not be coMittoned and the City mist see evidence that school
impaction fs mitigated.
Chairman Mc Niel suggested continutng the project to October 25 and scheduling
the items for the November 1 City Council meeting. He felt the Commission
needed to see the agreement before supporting the project.
Mr. Duller requested that the applicant Consent to a continuance on the Map.
Mr. Pitassi agreed to the continuance.
Motion: Moved by Ch it lea, seconded by Blakestey, to continue Environmental
Assessment and Generat°P'lan Amendment 89-02A, Environmental Assessment and
Development District Amendment 87-12, and Environmental Assessment and
Tentative Tract 14263 to October 25, 1989. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 9LAK ESI EY, CNIT[EA, MC NI EL, TOLSTOY
NOES: CONMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NEINBERGER -carried
Planning Commission Minutes -t 3- October 11, 1989
a~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. 89-133
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02A, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE
GENERAL PLAN LANG USE MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO MEO SUM
DENSITY RESIO ENTI AL f8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR
1.78 ACRES OF LANG LOCATED WEST OF CARNELIAN, EAST OF THE
CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, ANO SOUTH OF
VIVERO STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ANO MgKi NG
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-022-64
A. Recitals.
(i) E.G.M. Development has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 89-02A as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred
to as "the application".
(ii) On October 11, 1989, Lhe Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
Dn this date, it was requested that the item be continued to the next
regularly sc heduied meeting on October 25, 1989.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commiss ton
during the above-referenced public hearings on October 11 and October 25,
1989, including written an6 oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, th 1S Commi3'41on hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to approximately 1.76 acres of
land, in basically a triangular configuration, located west of Carnelian, east
of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, and south of Vivera and is
press.^.tly vacant. Said property is currently deli mated a3 Fio09 Goatrnl; and
a~a-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-133
RE: GPA 89-02A - E.G.M. DEVELOP.
October 25, 1989
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is
designated Medium Density Residential !8-14 dwelling units per acre) and has 3
existing single family homes. The property to the west is designated Flood
Control and Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre` and is
developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and single family
homes. The property to the east is designated Low Density Residential (2-4
dwelling units per ac rep and is developed with existing single family homes.
The ;ro pe rty to the south is designated Flood Control and has an existing
channel ,. ra .n; and
(c) The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be adequately
pro tet ted from flows from the north and east, as determined by the Engineering
Divi Sion as a result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection
measures; and
(d `, The site is of adequate size and shape to meet ali
development standard requirements, as evidenced by the design of the related
development proposal, Tentative Tract 14263; and
(e) The site will have adequate access to accommodate the
proposed use, based on extensive traffic analysis by the Engineering Division
and proposed future roadway improvements; and
(f) The proposed use is compatible with existing and future
land uses in the area, as the proposed site is separated from any existing
residential uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Carnelian
Avenue to the east and west, and the existing Cucamonga County Na ter District
r~.,, .,, ~ ~ .,....e c,.. t, ~~„
!g) The pro pa sed amendment wfll not have significant impacts
on the environment, public services, nor the surrounding properties, as
evidenced 6y the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part II, and
the implementation of a mitigation agreement between the property owner and
Chaffey Joint Union High Schaal District and the Central School District; and
(h) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan, as evidenced -hX the ability of the proposed land use designation to
satisfy the stated goats, objectives, and policies contained in the text; and
(i) The pro Dosed amendment is in conformance with the policies
and objectives contained within the Development Code, as evidenced by the
ability of the pro pa sed site to meet deveta pment standards.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the spetiftc fi ndfngs of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a ~3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-133
RE: GPA 89-02A - E.G.M. DEVELOP.
October 25, 1989
Page 3
(a) That the subject property is suitable for Lhe uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use ih the surrounding area; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
(c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
Gene rai Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compiiance with the California Environmental Duality Act of
1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative
Oec la ration.
5. 8a sed upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
fi5850 and 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
25th day of October, 1989, of General Plan Amendment 89-02 R.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly fntroduted, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 25th day of October, 1489, by the following vote-to=wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, MC NIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMTlS5I0NEA5: BLAKESLEY
~lo
RESOLUTION N0. 89-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PMENOMENT 87-12, REQUESTING TO AM ENO
THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNI iS PER ACRE)
FOR 1.18 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF
CARNELIAN AVENUE, EAST OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD
CONTROL CHANNEL, AND SOUTH OF VIVERO STREET, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FI NDiNGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 201-022-64
A. Recitals.
(i) E.G.M. Development has filed an application for Development
District Pmendment No. 87-12 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is
referred to as "the application".
(ii) On October 11, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
On this date, it was requested that the item be continued to the nett
regularly scheduled meeting of October 25, 1989.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings on October 11 and October 25,
1989, including wri elen and oral staff reports, together wf th public
testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to aDProximately 1,70 acres of
land, in basically a triangular configuration, located west of Carnelian, east
of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Conrrol Channel, and south of Vivero and is
presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Flood Control; and
~~~
PLANNING LOMM iSSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-134
RE: DDA 87-12 - E.G.M. DEVELOP.
October 25, 1989
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated
Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and has 3 existing
single family homes. The property to the west is designated Flood Control and
Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre! and is developed with
the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and single family homes. The
property to the east is designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units
per acre) and is developed with existing single family homes. The property to
the south is designated Flood Control and has an existing channel drain; and
'c) The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District and wilt be adequately
protected from flows from the north and east, as determined by the Engineering
Division as a result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection
measures; and
(d) the site is of adequate size and shape to meet all
development standard requirements, as evidenced by the design of the related
development proposal, Tentative Tract 14263; and
(e) The site will have adequate access to accommodate the
proposed use, based on extensive traffic analysis by the Engineering Division
and proposed future roadway improvements; and
(f) The proposed use is compatible with existing and future
land uses in the area, as the proposed site is separated from any existing
residential uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Carnelian
Avenue to the east and west, and the existing Cucamonga County Na ter DSStrict
reservoir to the north; and
(g) The proposed amendment will not have significant impacts on
the environment, public services, nor the surrounding properties, as evidenced
by the conclusf ons and findings of the Initial Study, Part II, and the
implementotfon of a mitigation agreement between the property owner and
Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the Central School District; and
(h) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use designation to
satisfy the stated Beefs, o6~ec Lives, and poiic tes contained in the text; and
(i) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the policies
and ob,jettives contained within the Development Code, as evidenced by the
ability of the proposed site to meet development standards.
3. 6a sed upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-134
RE: ODA 87-12 - E.G.M. DEVELOP.
October 25, 1989
Page 3
(a) That. the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the enviro nmer~t nor the surrounding properties; and
(c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Att of
1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration,
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
65850 and 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning
Commiss Tan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the
25th day of October, 1989, of Development District Amendment 87-12.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certf fy to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH OAY OF OCTOBER, 1989.
PLANNING COM~IS SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA
r
BY: ~
arry T ie , Cba3rman
ATTEST
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rant ho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 25th day of October, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MC NIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
a~~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~. 5 ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN ANENOMENT
89-02A, RMENDI NG THE GENERAL PLAN LANG USE MAP FROM FLOOD
CONTROL TO MED IDM~DENSI TY RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DNELLI NG
UNITS PER ACRE) FQt APPRO%IMATELY 1.78 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE MESI' 570E OF CARNELi AN, EAST OF THE
CUCPMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, AND SOUTH OF
V[VERO STREET, AND MAIC ING FI NO INGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 207-022-64
A. Recitals.
(i) E.G.M. Development has filed an application for General Plan
Amerdment No. 89-02A as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the su6~ect General Plan Amendment is referred
to as the "appltcati on".
(ii) On October 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
ard, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution
No. Q4•It,~,thereby recommending to this City Council that said application be
approve .
(iii) On November 1, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
(ivj Nii iegai prerequ is rtes prior to me adopt ton m to is
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by Lhe
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals,-Pert "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in complfaue with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff
reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a~~
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPR 99-02A
November 1, 1989
Page 2
(a) The property is su itab ie for the use proposed, as it has been
designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be adequately
protected from flows from the north and east, as determined by the Engineering
Division as a result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection
measures; and
;b) The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all development
standard requirements, as evidenced by the design of the related development
proposal, Tentative Tract 14263; and
(c) The site will have adequate access to accommodate the proposed
use, based on extensive traffic analysts by the Engineering Division and
proposed future roadway improvements; and
(d) The proposed use is compattb le with existing and future land uses
in the area, as the proposed site is separated from any ex istirg residential
uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Carnelian Avenue to the
east and west, and the ex (sting Cu camorga County Water District reservoir to
the north; and
(e) The proposed amendment is to conformance with the General Plan,
as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use designation to satisfy
the stated goals, obJecttves, and policies contatned in the text; and
(f) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the Doltctes and
obJectives contatned within the Development Code, as evidenced by the ability
of the proposed site to meet development standards; and
(g) The proposed amendment will not have adverse Impacts on the
environment, public services, nor the surrounding properties, and evidenced by
the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II, and the
implementation of mitigation agreements between the property owner and the
Ch affey Joint Union High School District and the Central School District.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves
the applf cat tan.
S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adopt ton of this Resolution.
4 w
ORDINANCE N0. ~ d
AN ORD MANCE OF THE CITY CW NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT N0. 87-12, AMEIOING THE DEVELOPMENT OiSTRICTS
MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(8-14 OW ELLI NG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 1.78
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST S[DE OF CARNELIAN, EAST
OF THE CUCPMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, AND SOUTH
OF VI VERO STREET, AND MAKING FI NO iNGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
- APN: 207-022-64
A. Recitals.
(i) On October 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with resD ect to the
abcve-referenced Development Oistr ict Amendment. Following the conclusion of
said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Development District
Amendment No. 87-12.
(f i) On November 1, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing
prior to its adoption of this Ordinance.
(iii) .411 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
Section 1: This Council hereby specifies aM finds that all of the
facts set o~ nth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and
correct.
Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the pro,lect
has been rev iewe~'and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality #vt of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a
Negative Declaration.
Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows:
la) The property is suitable for the use proposed, as tt has been
designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be adequately
protected from flows from the north and east, as determined by the Engtneerlrg
Dt vis ion as a result of hydrologic ana lysls and proDOSed flood protection
measures; aM
(b) The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all development
standard requirements, as evidenced by the design of the related development
proposal, Tentative Tract 14263; and
ago
CITY COUNCIL ORO INANCE N0.
OOA 87-12
November 1, 1909
(c) The site will have adequate access to accommodate the proposed
use, based on extensive traffic analysis by the Engineering Division and
proposed future roadway improvements; and
(d) The proposed use is compatible with existing and future land uses
in the area, as the proposed site is separated from any ex istirg residential
uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and Carneifan Avenue to the
east and west, and the existing Cucamonga County water District reservoir to
the north; and
(e) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan,
as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use designation to satisfy
the stated goals, obJectives, and policies contained in the tent; and
(f) The proposed amendment is in confonma~e with the policies and
obfec tives contained within the Development Code, as evidenced by the ability
of the proposed site to meet development standards; and
(g) The proposed amendment w511 not have adverse tracts on the
environment, public services, rmr the surrounding properties, and evidenced by
the coot to sions and findings of the Init tat Study Part II, and the
implementation of mitigation agreements between the property owner and the
Ch affey Joint Onion High School District and the Central School District.
Section 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
approves evD et-opment DSS tract Amendment 87-12 thong inq the district
designation from Flovd Control to Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) for those properties comprisi nq approximately 1.78 acres,
located west of Carnelian, eas*..u the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel
and south of Vt vero Street.
Section 5: The Cfty Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Ordinance and sha 1 cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Da11 Re art, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City o n ai-b~1o l:aTTfornia, and circulated in
the CSty of Rancho Cucammrga, Caltforma.
r/ ~1
n.mv na n ~ ~rnun nr rn ~ ~snwrn n
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 89-
uzc - ruluBt t~lnlt, 1M:. - a request to amens the uenerai
an an se p rom fice to Medium Density Residential
(8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 3.556 acres of land
located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and
Church Street. The City wilt also consider Neighborhood
Commercial and Low Medium Density Residential as alternative
designations - APN: 1077-332-26.
ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELODMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
NU. tl9-U4 - rUTUNt ESlATt, Lm:. - A request LO ame0a Lne
eve opmen s r c p ram (Office/Professional) to
"M" (Medium Density, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 3.556
acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald
Avenue and Church Street. The City will also consider "NC"
(Neighborhood Commercial) and 'LM" (Low Medium) as
altarna tiuo dicfr;,-~" _ eou• Im? 33e 2~.
This application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meeting
of October 25, 1989. At that time, the applicant requested a
continuance in order to complete impact mitigation measures required of
the Drofect. The application was continued to the Commission's November.
8, 1989 meeting and no final action was taken.
It is therefore appropriate to open the hearing to receive any public
testimony, and then continue the item to the Council's November 15, 1989
meeting.
Resp ct ly sub ted
Bra
City Pia er
BB:AW:ko
a 7a-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, ]989
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY; Cindy Norris, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-020 -
RANCHO CUC ONG REDEVELOPMENT GENCY - request to amend
the Land Use Element of the General plan from Flood Control
to Civic/Community for 3.15 acres of land, located on the
north side of Banyan Street, east of the Deer CreeY, Channel -
APN: 201-191-24,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT
89-OS - R NCHO CUCA110NGA REDEVELOPMENT GENCY - A request to
amend the Development Districts Map from Flood Cant rol to Low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 3.15 acres of
land, located on the north side of Banyan Street, east of the
Oeer Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-24.
I. RECOMMENDATION: On September 27, 1989 the Planning Commission
-~~-- --••~•-• ~•. ~~ „„i~~wrnen~ oo-uw and ueve io pment
District Amendment 89-OS be approved by City Council to amend the
General Plan designation from Flood Control to Civic/Community and
the Development Districts Map from Flood Control Lo Low Denisty
Res iden *_ia 1. if the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached
Resolution and Ordinance of approval would be appropriate.
II. ABSTRACT: The City Council will review the findings and
conclusions of the Planning Commission and make a determination on
the pro pa sed Gene~ir 1 Plan and Development District Amendment
requests, to change the land use designations from Flood Control to
Civic/Community and Low Density Residential respectively, for the
subject property,
III. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission reviewed these
apo aation~ s at the;r regularly scheduled meeting of September 27,
1989. At this meeting the Commission reviewed the proposed
amendments for consistency with the General Plan, need for public
facilities, compatibility with surrounding land use, and the
possibility of significant environmental impacts.
a~~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: GPA 89-02D b DOA 89-05 - RDA
November 1, 1989
Page 2
Based on this review, Lhe Planning Commission determined that the
provision for adequate levels of service of a public facility is
identified in the goals and objectives of the Public Facilities b
Public Safety elements of the General Plan, that there is a need
for additional fire protection service as a result of the rapid
S rowth in the City, and that the location of t.^.e proposed facility
is compatible with surrounding land uses in the area, as potential
impacts can be mitigated as a result of site design.
As a result, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a
mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan
Amendment 89-02D and Development District Amendment 89-05. If
additional details are needed concerning the above discussion,
please refer to the attached Planning Cammiss ion staff report.
IV. FALTS FOR FIND [NGS: 8a sed on the conclusions listed in the
attached Planning Commission staff report of September 27, 1989,
the City Council can make the fol cowing findings:
1. The property is suits 6le for the use proposed, as it has
keen designated surplus by the Flood Control District and
will be adequately protected from flows from the north,
=_s determined by the Engineering Division as a result of
hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection
measures; and
2. The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all
development standard requirements, as evidenced 6y the
design of the related development proposal, CUP 89-24;
and
3. The site will have adequate access to accommodate the
proposed use, based on compatibility with the adjacent
residential collector street artd proposed future roadway
improvements; and
4. The proposed use is compatible with existing and future
land uses in the area, a5 land to the north and east will
be used for flood control purposes and the residential
properties to the west and south have been designed in a
manner which minimizes possible use ren fl is ts; ar,C
5. The proposed amendments will not have significant impacts
on the environment nor the surrounding properties, as
evidenced by the coot fusions and ff ndings of the Initial
Study Part II; and
~~~
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RE: GPA 89-020 b ODA 89-OS - ROA
November I, 1989
Page 3
6. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
General Plan, as evidenced by the ability of the propo 5ed
land use designation to satisfy the stated goals,
objectives, and policies contained in the text; and
,. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
poiic ies and objectives contained within the Development
Code, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed site to
meet development standards.
V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted with a
supplemental large notification sign, and notices sent to all
property owners Within 300 feet of the project site.
VI. AG TION: If the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission far approval of General Plan Amendment 89-020
and Development District Amendment 89-05, then adoption of the
attached Resolution and Ordinance would be appropriate.
Resp lly s fitted,
v '
0
Brad er
Citv P anner
BB:CN:ko
Attachments: Pia nning Conmission Staff Report of September 21, 1989
Planning Conission Minutes of September 27, 1989
Planning Conmiss ion Resolution of Approval for
CPA 89-02D
Planning Ccmmission Resolution of Approval for
DDA 89-05
Reso181'ion of Approval for GPA 89-02D
Ordinance of Approval for DDA 89-05
~~
..
rnmv no o w wrn on rn rn w •nnr,rr ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September~27, 1989
T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FRON Brad Buller, City Planner
I
BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN PMENDMENT 89-02D
- AN R L N N Y - R request to
amend the LaM L'se ement of the nera Plan from Flood
Control to Civic /Conmuntty for 3,15 acres of land, located
on the north side of Banyan Street, east of the Deer Creek
Channel - APN: 201-191-24.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AM NDM N - - N
A request to amend t e eve opment 1strlcts ap nom
Flood Control tc Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) for 3.15 acres of land, located on the north side of
Banyan Street, east of the Deer Creek Channel -
APN: 201-191 -24.
RELATED FILES: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-24 ANO
PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Su rrourd in Lard Use and Zon in
North - scant; ood Contro
South - Single family homes under construction; (4-8
dwelling units per acre)
East - Vacant; Flood Control
Nest --Single family homes uMer construct ton; low
Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)
B. General Plan Oest nations:
ro ec[ ite - ao ontrol
North - Flood Cent rol
South - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)
. East - Flood Control
West - Law Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per
acre)
a~~
PLANNING COMMISSIP" STAFF REPORT
OOA 89-05 - RANCHC JCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 21, 1989
Page 2
C. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacant with an
approximate slope of 4-1/2 percent from north to south. The
Oeer Creek Channel abuts the west property boundary with
Banyan Street adjacent to the south.
In addition to this General P1anvDevelopment District
Anie ndment request, the City is also processing Conditional Use
Permit Application 89-24 and Parcel Map 12779 for this project
site.
II. ENVI kONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study
Part and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part ii of the
Initial Study, aM has found that no significant environmental
impact will occur as a result of the proposed General Plan
Amendment 89-020 and Development District Amendment DDA 89-05.
III. LAND USE ANALYSIS: The requested amendments propose a land use
charge from-Flood~ontrol (FC) to a Public Facility designation of
Civic /Community aM a Deve lopment District change from Flood
Control to Low Density Residential. Public facilities are a
conditionally permitted use in the Residential District.
The proposed Land Use/Development 0is tr ict Amendments have been
reviewed for consistency with the General Plan, need for public
facflit to s, and compatibility with surrounding Land Use.
Cons is to n~
The provision for adequate levels of service of a public facility,
including fire protection, is identified in the goals and
objectives of the Public Facflit ies and Public Safety elements of
the City's General Plan. As specifically stated in the Public
Safety element, "...the health and well-being of the Community and
the physical safety of its structures shall be safeguarded."
Figure V-7 of the General Plan, Fire Hazards and Fire Stations,
indicates the approximate future locations for new Fire Stat ton
facilities (Exhibit "C"). The locations are not intended to be
site specific, but to be an indication of possible future need
that may be adjusted over time as the City develops and as new
information, heco~nes available.
Need
The need for pu611c facilities has increased as a result of the
raptd growth in the City, particularly with regard to Fire
Protection Service. The Redevelopment Agency, together with the
F1 re Department, has developeA a master plan for development of
~~
PLANNING COMMISSIO" STAFF REPORT
DOA 89-OS - RANCNL JCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 27, 1989
Page 3
fire stations (Exhibit "E"). The master plan is based on the
achievement of adequate response times within each defined service
area and the provision of safe levels of coverage to all parts of
the City as well as the sphere areas. Each station's service area
s approximately three (3) miles in diameter and the proposed
service level is an attempt to reach ninety (40) percent of the
calls within five (5) minutes. Therefore, as the location of
future fire stat tons is dependent upon the established locations
of new and ex lsting facilities, it is aDPare nt that a station is
necessary in the immediate area of the subject property in order
to ensure adequate coverage.
Compatibility
The proposed land use fs compatible with the surrounding land uses
in the area. The requested facility is located in the northern
port ton of the City in which the maJority of the lard uses are
lower density, sing le family residential, with the exception of
the flood control properties located directly to the north and
east, and the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel which abuts the
west boundary, Exhibit "A".
The residential lands are currently under construction and have
been designed with a rear-on configuration to Banyan Street and
property boundary walls. Additionally, Banyan Street is a
des iy ne ied res idenLiai wiiei. iur nii iii imo ieaG i~Led pu iuLy u.
access, thereby allowing adequate ingress and egress. Potential
t raff lc and other use conflicts, lnc lud irg noise impacts, should
be adequately mitigated.
The Flood Control District has determined that the subject
property 1s not necessary for flood control purposes, as Deer
Creek Channel located to the west, has been improved and a
siltation basin fs to be constructed east of the site. Flood
protection meailllp s, to protect the site from flows from the
north, will be required with the related development proposal.
IV. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANALYSIS: State law requires that the
Deve opment sir ct, .e ., Doing Ordinance, be consistent with
the General Plan (Section 65860, Government Cade). If findings
can 6e made to warrant the General Pian 0.merdment to
Civic/Community facilities, Lhen similar findings should also be
made regarding the Development District Amendment charge to Low
Density Residential in which public facilities are conditionally
permitted.
a~~
PLANNING COMMISSIC' STAFF REPORT
DOA 89-08 - RANC HL JCAMONGA REO EVELOPNENT AGENCY
September 27, 1989
Page 4
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the General Plan and
Development District Amendments, the Commission would have to
determine Lh at the charge would promote the land use goals and
policies of the General Plan and not be materially detrimental to
the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmen tal
impacts. Following are the findings that are necessary:
1. The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District
and will be adequately protected from flows from the
north, as determined 6y the Engineering Division as a
result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood
protection measures; and
2. The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all
development standard requirements, as evidenced by the
design of the related development proposal, CUP 89-24;
and
3. The site will have adequate access to accomrrod ate the
proposed use, based on compatibility with the adjacent
residential collector street and proposed future roadway
improvements; and
4. The proposed use is compatible with existing and future
Lana uses rn the area, as is na to the nor to ana east
will be used for flood control purposes and the
residential properties to the west and south have been
designed in a m-v nner which minimizes possible use
conflicts; and
5. The proposed amendments will not have significant
impacts or, the envf ranment nor the surrou nd irg
properties, as evidenced by the conclusions and findings
of the In itiaLStu dy Part II; and
6. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
General Plan, as evidenced by the ability of the
proposed land use designation to satisfy the stated
goals, objectives, and polic tes contained in the
documents; anC
7. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the
policies and objectives contained within the Oevelapment
Code, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed site
to meet development standards.
a ~~
PLANNING COMMISSIO" STAFF REPORT
OOA 89-OS - RANCNG lCPMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 27, 1989
Page 5
V1. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a puh lic hearing
in he ail Re ort newspaper, the property posted with a
supp emental arge notification sign, and notices sent to all
property owners within 300 feet of the prof ect site.
VII. RECOMMENDAT [ON: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of General
Plan Pmendment 89-02D and Development District Pmendment 89-05 to
the City Ca ncil and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Res tfu lly tied,
Brad B ler
City anner
BB:CN:mtg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan
Exhibit "B" - Yic inity and Location Map
Exhibit "C" - General Plan Figure V-7
Exhibit "D" - Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Fire Protection Fac ilit tes Master Plan
Resolution of Approval for GPA 09-020
Ke so iu tion or Approval ror uuA u9-u5
aC
_ - ~
1
e ................ --
^ --- •~ 1
• :•: :. ::::::.~ •: 1. ::::. ~.•::: ~~. ~... ..,~.,..:::::.: ~: ~:: :i~:..,.'......: ~ '.
~~
.:,tit,. ;,cc;
i,' i~ ~
CITY Ofi RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM:
PLANNING DMSION rrri,E: ~onr~n/ p/an ~
Exx~e~T: scALe:
a ~~
ift
zo2 iy0
13.03AC~\\~
Low Ocnsi>Ey
Ac>fidcnt~aL
Po~.z
~I
19.66AC O
~ V~21V
i.~~ . ,
37 ~ 11
~`. (ern f
.IBA6.
\~,
/l~s
41
iun ~~. O
'K G g
cA
aa.aac, 3
n
~-
+
,1~5 yel `,
~
/
~
?~ fl C
F
C:
O
I
E~S
2 .
,
.
;
.
,
~ i
,~
f/ood Cunf~ol
~ Va~lnt
,~,Iw.~
Sits
i
1 I
se2cs /.l /.~ .-'I I
,„
Vacanf
Loua rJcdivm I~
33.673 AC.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
Fire
Statio~
No.
ITEM:
TmE:Lare><ien ~ ust /I7ee N
EXQHIBIT: SCALE:
~0
n
.,
ro0
r ~+f
z~
~~
do
~n
c
^' a
°zo
z
a
r~~ ~
ri ~ ~~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C
~7~ ~ a
~ ~l ~
~'~
a~3
~_ -:.~_
~..%
/ /~
i~- -~ ~i
~~ ~ ~ , Fire
.. Station
~ ~-~ "..
~ 'j~ ,,~" ~~~ !~ o,..,..
,. ,.; . ,~
l ~• i-"
~~~
r-1 i i 1
~ ~ '
~~w W~~Y~
_~ ~ ua uun
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM:
PLANNING DMSION ~,~; 5,~~ 2«,y N
E%HIBIT: ~ SCALE:
a~~
0
ry~n
Y
nZ
A
O'
A
n'
a
0
x
c~
a
b
yr
2
Z
b
0
z
1
----'
~S
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITf EA, MC N[EL, TOLSTOY, MEI NBERGER
NOES: COM4I SSION ER S: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESL EY -carried
e + : + +
Chairman McNiel welcomed the attendance of Scout Varsity Team 677 from Alta
Loma in the audience. Team Coaches Dennis Coda and Scott Watson ird icated
they we~~~ attending to earn credit toward merit badges for citizenship in the
community.
.::++
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE $S,MENT ANO GENERAL PLAN FVAENDMENT 89-02E - CITY OF
H request to ame ection nvironmenta esources,
an ectior. V, ublic Safety, elements of the General Plan as they relate
to hillside development and grading and will involve revising the
definitions of hillside from 10% or greater to 8X or greater, as well as
restricting development on slopes which are 30X or greater.
Chairman McNiel indicated that staff had requested withdrawal of the
application to allow ft to be heard at a later time in con,iu nc tton with a
proposed Hillside Development Ordinance.
Motion: Moved by Ch itiea, seconded by McNiel, to withdraw Environmental
Assessment and General Plan Rme ndment 39-02E. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MC NI EL, TO LSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NEINBERGER -carried
. ~ a +
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-O2o - RANCHO
Y - reques o amen e a se emen
o the nera an rom ood Control to Civic/Community for 3.15 acres
of land, located on the north side of Banyan Street, east of the Deer
Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-20..
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-OS - RANCHO
GUGPMUNGA NEU EYELOPMENI R(iENCY - R requeSL t0 amend the Development
istr c s ap ran o0 on rol to Low ResidenH al (2-4 dwelling units
per acre) for 3.15 acres df land, located on the north side of Banyan
Street, east of the Deer Creek Channel -APN: 201-191-24.
Planning Commission Minutes -10- Septellber 27, 1989
~C~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MCNI EL, TOLSTOY, NEiNBERGER
NOES: COMAISS IONER S: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY -carried
k * * * *
Chairman McNiel welcomed the attendance of Scout Varsity Team 677 from Alta
Loma in the audience. Team Coaches Dennis Coda and Scott Nat son indicated
they wen= attending to earn credit toward merit badges for citizenship in the
community.
* k * k k
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02E - CITY OF
- request to ame ec Lion V, nvironmen a esou rce s,
an ec~ tT o V, Aublic Safety, elements of the General Plan as they relate
to hillside development and grading and will involve revising the
definitions of hillside from 10% or greater to riX or greater, as well as
restricting development on slopes which are 30% or greater.
Chairman McNiel indicated that staff had requested withdrawal of the
application to allow it to be heard at a later time in con3unction with a
proposed Hillside Development Ordinance.
Motion: Moved by Ch itiea, seconded by McNiel, to withdraw Environmental
Assessment and General Plan Amendment 89-02E. Motion carried by the following
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MC NI EL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMIISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BI.AKESLEY
ABSTAIN: CONM [SS ION ER S: NEINBERGER -carried
# k * * *
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-ODi - RANCHO
Y - reques o amen e a se ement
o the nera an nom dad Control to Civic/Community for 3.15 acres
of land, located on the north side of Banyan Street, east of the Oeer
Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-24.
H. ENYiRONMENTAi ASSESSMENT ANO OEVELUPMENT U1STHICT PMENDMENT 89-05 - RANCHO
~u~rmurvn rccu crewrneni ru;en~t - n request to amend the ueve iopment
stn cts ap nom o on rol to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units
per acre) for 3.15 acres of lard, located on the north side of Banyan
Street, east of the Deer Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-24.
Planning Commission Minutes -10- September 27, 1989
~-"
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-24 - RANCHO
N N - e deve opment o a ire station
iota ng ,02 square eet on 3.15 acres of larxl in the Flood Control
Oistric t, located on the north side of Banyan Street, east of the Deer
Creek Channel - APN: 201-191 -24. Associated wfth this prof ect is General
Plan Amendment 89-02D and Development District Amendment 89-05.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO PARCEL MAP 19774 -
within the Flood Control Development District, located on the north side
of Banyan Street, east of Deer Creek Channel - APN: 201-191-24.
Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if the elevations shown were the ffnal designs for
Fire Station No. 5.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Larry Wolff, Wolff/Lang/Christopher, stated there were still some minor
revisions which Here not shown.
Commissioner Chit tea stated the glass shown on the elevations went all the way
to the ground.
Mr. Wolff stated the revision to a bay window was not caught when the
elevations were revised.
Chairman McNiel asked if the screen wall should be brick to match the building
or natural river rock to be compatible with the balance of the wall running in
eithar direction.
Commissioner Tolstoy preferred brick, as it would be a short wall with
pilasters 40 feet apart. He felt it should fit the fire station.
Commissioner Chitiea felt it should be internally consistent with the fire
station.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that there will 6e a lot of brick on the building
and he did not feel another material should be introduced on such a short
wall.
Chairman McNiel felt the wall relates more to the streetscape than to the
building. He preferred natural stone.
Brad 8ulle r, City Planner, stated according Gi the Sr»SS sec kton on fhe plans
the wall would not be visible to the public street because of a proposed
landscape berm in front of it. He stated it would be like a retaining Wall.
Chairman McNfel stated that the portion exposed to the parking tot side should
be brick.
Planning Commfssion Minutes -11- September 27, 1989
~0 O
Mr. Wolff stated they would use brick and plaster for the wall.
Hearing no further testimony, the public hear irg was closed.
Commissioner Chitiea concurred that the wall should be brick
Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adapt the Resolutions
recommending approval of Environmental Assessment aM General Plan Pmendnent
89-020 and Environmental Rs ses spent and Development District Ane ndnent 89-05
and approving En vironne ntal Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 89-24 and
Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 12779, with a modification to provide
for a stucco and brick screen wall. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMHI SSIONER S: CHI TI EA, MC NI EL, TOLSTOY, WEIN BERGER
NOES: COMMISS[O NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMI SSfONER S: BLA.KESLEY -carried
« • . • >
K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-23 -
w~rmunuN ntu tvewrmeni ~u,enci - me aeve iopnent or a pre station,
maintenance aci tty, tra n ng center and tralnirg tower totaling 36,328
square feet on 7.08 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial
District (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Area Specific Plar., located at the
sou thhest corner of the proposed extensions of Jersey Boulevard and
Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-111-23.
Otto Krou til, Deputy Cfty Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman McNiel asked if the tower were not included, where the building would
end.
Mr. Kroutil stated that *.he detailing would still need to be reviewed by
Design Review.
Commissioner Chitiea asked if the color has been selected.
Mr. Kratil stated current direction called for a warm gray stripe with
reddish burgundy 12-f11Ch block and samples were avaf lab le for revfew. He
stated the colors could stilt be addressed with the discussion of the
d etaf li ng.
Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.
Larry Wolff, Wolff/Lang /Christopher, stated he was available to answer
quest tons.
Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, stated he appreciated the
support received from the RDA, Planning, and Engineering staff.
Planning Coimiission Minutes -12- Septerber 27, 1989
d'8 /
RESOLUTION N0. 89-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN PMENDMENT 89-02D REQUESTING TO AMEN) THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM FL000 CONTROL TO
CIVIC/COMMUNITY FOR 3.15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET, EAST OF THE DEER CREEK FL000
CONTROL CHANNEL, RND MAKING FI PAINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 201-191-24.
A. Recitals.
(i) The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has filed an
application far General Pian Wnerdment No. 89-02U, as described in the title
of this Re so lu Lion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the su6,)ect General Plan
AnK'Mment is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On September 21, 1989, the Plann ing Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hear irsg on the application.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have otcu rred.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby Spec if icallY finds that all of the fat is
set forth in Reclta ls, Part "A", of this Re so lu Lion are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 27, 1989, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commisston hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to approximately 3.15 acres of
la M, 1n basically a-R tangu lar conf lgu rat ton, located on the north side of
Banyan Street, east of the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel and is presently
vacant. Said property is currently designated as Flood Control; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is
designated Flood Control and is vacant. The property to the west is
designated Lew Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre} and is under
construction. The property to the east is designated Flood Control and is
vacant. The property to the south 1s designated Low Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) and is under constnlctton; and
~9~
PLANNING COMMISSION 'SOLUTION NO. 89-121
GPA 89-02D
SeptenDer 21, 1989
Page 2
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the
district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
(d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of
the Land Usa Element; and
(e) The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be adequately
protected from flows from the north, as determined by the Engineering Division
as a result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection measures; and
(f) This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant inq act
on the environment nor the su rrourd ing propert tes and fs su ante of a Negative
Declaration is recommended; and
(g) The proposed land use w711 have adequate access based on
compatibility with the bordering collector street and as determined by the
Engineering Oivis ton's traffic analysis and the proposed roadway improvements;
aM
(h) The subject parcel is of an adequate sfze to enable a
proDOSed facility to meet development staMard requirements: and
(i) The Drooosed land use is comoatih In with ax ist inn land
uses in the area, as mich of the surrounding land is or will remain
undeveloped or can be designed so as to minimize poss f6le Impacts.
3. Based upon the subs tent cal evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-refere nted public hear ing and upon the specific f/nd Togs of
facts set forth 1n paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(aj That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted to the propo5ltl dlstr ict 1n terms of access, size, and compatibility
with existing land use to the surrounding area; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have s7gnfflcant
lmpac is on the environment nor Lhe 5urrou nd log propert to s; and
(cj That the preposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends Issuance of a Negative
Oeclaratlon.
~I
PLANNING COMMISSfr" RESOLUTION N0. 89-121
GPA 89-031
Septenber 27, 1989
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Darag raDhs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of
September, 1989, of Generai Plan Amendment No. 84-02D.
6. The Secretary to this Comm iss ton sh all certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND PDOP7ED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989.
PLANNING COP ISS ION nOF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: '~" ~` r
arry cN ie hairman _
I, Brad Bu 11er, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cfty of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the toregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commiss ton of the
Citv of Rancho Cu camonea. at a reau lar meoti nn of th- Plannim rnmw/«/q., tie In
on the 27th day of September, 1989, by the follow lrg vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMAISSIONER S: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBE RGER
LADES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COPM[SSIONLRS: BLAKESLEY
C~ oZ-
RESOLUTION N0. gg_lp2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CINMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-05, REQUESTING TO AMEND
THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO LON
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DNELLI NG UNITS PER ACRE) FOR
3.15 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN
STREET, EAST OF THE DEER CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHRNNEL, AND
MAKING FI NO INGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-191-24.
A. Recitals.
(7) The City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency has filed an
application for Development District Amendment No. 89-05, as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,)ect
Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application".
(it) On September 27, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cu camorga conducted a di ly noticed pu611c hearing on the application
and recommended to the City Council that the essoctated General Plan Amendment
No. 89-020 De approved.
(iii) R11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
0. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORE, tt is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
~;oun iiy Cun.n ias iun ui Liie Ciiy ui naiK.iw Cu canimya as roi lows:
1. Th 15 CommlS Ston hereby spec iflc ally finds that all of the facts
set forth in Recitals, Part "A", of this Re so lut ton are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
diving the shove-referenced public hearing on September 27, 1989, including
written and oral staff reports, together with pu619c testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies Lo approximately 3.15 acres oP
land, 1n basically a trlargular configuration, located on the north side of
Banyan Street, east of the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel and is presently
vacant. Said property 1s arrently designated as Flood Control; and
(D) The property to the north of the subject sfte is
designated Fiood Control and is vacant. The property Lo the west is
designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acro) and is under
construction. The property to the east 1s designated Flood Control and 1s
vacant. The property to the south is designated Low Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre) and is under construction; and
a9.~
PLANNING COMMISSION SOLUTION N0. 89-122
ODA 89-05
September 27, 1969
Page 2
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Po lic tes of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the
district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
(d) The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has
been designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be adequately
protected from flows from the north, as determined by the Engineering Division
as a result of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection measures; and
(e) This amendment does promote the goals and ob,lectives of
the Land Use Element; and
(f) This amendment would not be materially in,)u rious or
detrimental to the adJ scent properties and would not have a significant fury act
on the environment nor the surrounding propert les; and
(g) The proposed land use will have adequate access based on
co~atib ility with the bordering collector street and as dete rmined by the
Engineering DTVision's traffic analysts and the proposed roadway improvements;
and
(h) The sub,tect parcel is of an adequate size to eneb le a
proposed facility to meet development standard requirements; and
(1) The proposed land use is compatible with exisrinn t..,w
uses in the area, as msh of the wrrou ndirq land 1s or will -remain
undeveloped or can be designed so as to minimize possible impacts.
3. Based upon the subs toot tai evidence presented to this Commtss ton
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the sut~ect property 1s suitable for the uses
perm It ted 1n the praeesed distr tct in terms of access, size, and compat tbiltty
with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
(c} That the proposed amendment is 1n conformance with the
General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the Callfornla Environmental quality Act of
1970 and, further, this Commission hereby rccammends issuance of a Negative
Oeclaratlon.
7
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-122
DDA 89-05
September 27, 1989
Page 3
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commis ston hereby resolves that pursuant to Section
65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of
September, 1989, of Development District Omendment 89-05.
6. The Secretary to this Commis slon shalt certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH OAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA
BY
f
I, Brad Butter, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fo regolrg Resolution was duly and
regularly intraduted, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Raneho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
.... ..,. ...y ..ter... ., , ..~ .,,.. .r l.Vn Ily V.c-iV -., .L.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER
NOES: CpMt5SI0NER5: NONE
ABSENT: COIRAISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
a9s
RESOLUTION N0. ~ - 5 Y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN FVAENDMENT
69-02D AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM FL000
CONTROL TO CIVIC/COMMUNITY FOR APPROXIMATELY 3.15 ACRES
OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BANYIW STREET, EAST
OF THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAILING F[ND INGS 1N SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 201-191-24.
A. Recitals.
(i) E.G.M. Development has filed an application for General Plan
Amendment No. 89-02D as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General P1 a,n Amendment is referred
to as the "appl icatf on".
(11) On Septenber 27, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga condo ted a An ly noticed public hearing an the application
and, following the conclusion of safd public hearing, adopted Resolution
No. 89-121 thereby recommending to this City Council that said application 6e
approved.
(iii) On NovemSer 1, 1989, the CSty Councfl of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conduted aduly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFgtE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically find that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Counie7l hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in co~liance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented t-0 this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff
reports, this Cauncfl hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) The property is wttable for the use proposed, as 1t has been
designated wrplus by the Flood Control 0lstrict and will be adequately
protected from flows from the north, as determined by the Engineering 01v1sion
as a rewlt of hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection meawres; and
2-9~
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
GPA 89-031
Page 2
(b) The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all development
sta Mard requirements, as evidenced by the design of the related development
proposal, CDP 89-24; aM
(c) The site will have adequate access to ac commM ate the proposed
use, based on compatibility with the ad,)acent residential collector street and
proposec future roadway improvenents; and
(d) The proposed use is compatible with existing aM future land
uses in the area, as land to the north and east will 6e used for flood control
purposes and the residential properties to the west aM south have been
designed in a manner which minimizes possible use conflicts; and
(e) The proposed amendments will not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surra Ming properties, as evidenced by the corolusions
aM findings of the Initial Study Part II; aM
(f) The proposed ameMments are 1n conformance with the General
Plan, as evidenced by the abilfty of the proposed laM use designation to
satisfy the stated goals, o6~ect Ives, and pollctes contained to the dowments;
and
(g) The proposed ameMments are in conformance with the policies aM
objectives contained within the Development Carla, as evidenced Dy the ability
of the proposed site to meet development stall and s.
4. The Ciiv Lau ncil of the City of Ra nrhn fncamnnna ha rahy an~rnvnc
the application.
5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
~-9 7
ORDINANCE N0. ~Q~
AN ORDINANCE OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT N0. 89-05 AMEIOING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO LON DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4
DNELLI NG UNiTS PER ACRE) Fat APPROXIMATELY 3.15 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE DF &1NYAN STREET, EAST OF
DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AIR) MP.KING FINDINGS IN SUPPatT
THEREOF - APN: 201-191-24.
A. Recitals.
(i) On Septerr6er 27, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga condo ted a duly noticed puhtic hearing with respect to the
above-referenced Development District Amendment. Following the conclusion of
said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 89-122
thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Development District
Amendment No. 89-05.
(ti) On November 1, 1989, the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing
prior to its adoption of this Ordinance.
(111) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of thfs
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows:
Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the
facts set o~~t~ the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and
correct.
Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the pro,lect
has been review and considered in compliance with the California
Environmental puality Pct of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a
Neg atfve Declaration.
Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows:
(a) The property is suitable for the use proposed, as it has been
designated surplus by the Flood Control District and will be adequately
protected from flows from the north, as determined by the Engineering Division
as a re wit of hydro log lc analysis and proposed flood protectfon meawres; and
(b) The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all development
standard requirements, as evidenced by the design of the related development
proposal, CUP 89-24; and
a9 ~-
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE M0.
ODA 89-05
Page 2
(c) The site will have adequate access to accommodate the proDased
use, based on compatibility with the ad,lacent residential collector street and
Droposed future roadway improvements; and
(d) The proposed use is tonpatible with existing and future lard
uses in the area, as land to the north and east will be used for flood control
purposes and the residential properties to the west and south have been
designed in a manner which minimizes possible use conflicts; and
(e) The proposed amendments will not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the wrra nd irg properties, as evidenced by the conclusions
and findings of the Initial Study Part II; and
(f) The proposed ame ndmerds are in conformance wtth the General
Plan, as evidenced 6y the ability of the proposed land use designation to
satisfy the stated goals, abJectives, and pollc ies contained in the dacumernts;
and
(g) The proposed amendments are in conformance with the policies and
ab,iectfves contained within the Development Code, as evidenced by the ability
of the proposed site to meet development standards.
Section 4: The Ctty Caunctl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
aDProves ev~e-~nt District Amendment 89-OS charging the district
designation from Flood Control to Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling
units per acre) for those Droperties located on the north side of Banyan
Street, east of the Deer Creek Channel.
Section 5: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
Ordinance air sTiaTl can se the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Oatl Re ort a newspaper of general
circulation published 1n the City o ntar o, a ornia, and circulated in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
X99
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner
e~3
SUB,I ECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 - MODIFICATION -A request to
appea a on on o pprova mpose y the Planning
Commission, requiring a pedestrian passageway through
Building K, within the Terra Vista Towne Center, located
at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill
Boulevard - APN: 1077-421-05, 06, and 13.
RECOMAENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the
on on o proval, requiring a pedestrian passageway through
Building K as imposed by the Planning Commission, and deny the
appeal.
II. BACKGRDUND: Since January 1988, the Planning Commission has been
con uc ng a series of workshops regarding the design of the Terra
'iie is Towne Cencer, accacnea is a cn ronology of the Comm ssion
workshops and Design Review meetings summarizing the topic of
discussions.
At the July 6, 1989 workshop, the Commission reviewed the various
site modifications that have occurred through design review of
Ma,j or 2 (Mervyn's) and Ma,lor 3 (Montgemery Nard). The Commission
indicated their desire to provide a pedestrian corridor through the
east side of the center to 1) provide direct access from the
parking area atshe rear of center, 2) provide a mere direct
access from future malts-family residential across the street. The
Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution
formalizing the approval of these various site modifications.
On September 27, 1989, the Commission conducted a public hearing to
review these modifications. After lengthy discussion over the
pedestrian passageway through Buiiding K and the concerns with the
Montgomery Nard Tire, Battery and Accessory Building, the
Commission conditionally approved the modification to Conditional
Use Permit 88-12 with requirement for the pedestrian walkway (see
Exhibit "D"). Exhibit "8" is a list of these various site
modifications, while Exhibit "C" shows the approximate locations of
these modifications.
~jp D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88-12 - MODIFICATION -TERRA VISTA TONNE CENTER
November 1, 1989
Page 2
Copies of the September 27, 1989 Planning Commission minutes and
the applicant's appeal letter have been included Tn this report for
your review too.
III. ANALYSIS: In order to assist the City Council on reviewing the
appe~this section of the report descrt6es the Commission's
established design Dolicies and the discussion and deliberation the
Commission has had regarding this Tssue and the applicant's concern
of the required passageway.
A. Slw~ry Of Plaawiwg Ca~i55ion CplSideratinll and diSCUSSip1.
A weed for the pedestrian wssawewr through Buildlna K.
In the Commission"s deliberations, the following factors
were considered as reasons fora pedestrian connection
on the east side of the Terra Yista Towne Center:
a. There are over 140 parking spaces located at the rear
of the buildings in this half of the center, Host of
which are concentrated behind Building 'K', with no
access to the storefront entrances. Providing
pedestrian access to these parking spaces would
ci~C Juldyc u1a.. u>e mw promo ie a shorter route for
employees who would typically park there,
b. There will be over 500 multi-family dwelling units
located across the street which could benefit from a
more direct access into the center.
c. As part of these modifications, the applicant deleted
two interior pedestrian connections from the
en~tainment c~wplex at the north end of the center.
d. The site plan for the center differs significantly
from the ortglnal Terra Vista Community Plan concept
1n which the greenway troll system teed directly
through the heart of the center all the way to the
corner of Haven and FocthiTl to encourage pedestrian
patrons by separating them from vehicular traffic.
~~~
PLANNING CDMMISSIDN STAFF REPORT
CUP 88-12 - MODIFICATION -TERRA YISTA TONNE CENTER
November 1, 1989
Page 3
e. The Community Plan envisioned this center as one in
which clustered buildings ",coined together by covered
walkways sheltering pedestrians" and "masses of the
various buildings in the center will be divided so as
to be human-scaled and not appear monolithic".
Established design policies for pedestrian connection.
The City's General Plan and Development Code contain
policies which encourage shopping centers to be designed
as human-scale, pedestrian-oriented centers. It has
been a long-standing design policy from the Commission
to require continuous pedestrian connection throughout
the site to connect buildings with parking areas, open
space and plaza areas. For example, the Foothill
Village Shopping Center, located at the southeast corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman, has two pedestrian
corridors leading to the back parking area because of a
significant amount of parking in the rear. The
neighborhood shopping center on the northeast corner of
Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, Haven Village, has a
pedestrian connection to the back parking area which
connects to the apartments to the east.
°. s :'.~_::,:c:, Ji i:,e pe.ieai.ri~n p~3w9B ~W' TAr0U9n
ng
At the Commission meeting of September 27, 1989, the applicant
raised concerns with opening up a section through Building K as
a pedestrian corridor to the barking area behind it. Dne of
the concerns was the proximity of Montgomery Nard truck and
loading activity. The pedestrian corridor m$y increase the
conflict between pedestrian and truck traffic. Mother concern
is the posslblylty of encouraging ,coy-walking which would pose
a security problem.
It should be noted that the specific footprint and elevations
for Building "K" have not been submitted. The pedestrian
corridor could be located closer to Building "J" to avoid
conflicts with the loading area of Montgomery hard. The
Planning Commission also stated to the applicant that they
would be willing to work with them 1n deterniiMng the final
location and design for that pedestrian corridor to alleviate
any safety and security concerns. it is staff's opinion that
safe pedestrian access can be provided with careful planning.
3aa-
PLANNING COIMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88-12 - MDDIFICATION -TERRA VISTA TONNE CENTER
November 1, 1989
Page 4
IY. CONCLUSION: Based on the above discussion, the Planning Commission
ee ed~rm~d-a pedestrian passageway through Building K is necessary
and a desirable amenity and feature. Staff concurs with the
P13nning Comaisslon. Staff feels that it is premature far the
applicant to state the safety and security concerns, when the exact
location and the design solution have not been attempted.
Respectfully submi~tted,/
~6+1~~~~000CG~C/
/Bra-d Buller
City Planner
BB:NF:js
Attachments: Appeal Letter from the Applicant
Chronology of the Meetings on Terra Yista Town Center
Planning Commission Workshop Minutes of July 6, 1989
Planning Commission Minutes of September 27, 1989
" " - pi c7iuu5iJ ^PP, ureu vi Le riau
Exhibit "B" - Revised Site Plan Showing Various Site
Modifications
Exhibit "C" - List and Sumaary of the Proposed
Modification
Exhibit "D" Resolution No. 89-120
Resolution of Denial
303
Lewis Homes Management Corp.
1156 NaN Moumeio Avenue / P.O. Box 6101 Upiaed, OlJoroix 91713 / ]Id 9461319
October 9, 1989 ~ '
Members of the City Council ~~
City of Rancho Cucamonga
c/o Debbie Adams, City Clerk
P.O. Box @07
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917]0
Re: Terra Vista Town Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Ladies and Gentlemen:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission held on the evening of
Wednesday, September 27, 1999, certain actions were taken by
unanimous vote concerning a proposed pedestrian passageway to be
included in the footprint of our proposed IIA" building located
within the above-captioned project.
We hereby respectfully appeal the decision of the Planning
Commission to the City Council, and request an immediate hearing
to he held on this matter.
Kindly contact me with the scheduling date as to the earliest City
council meeting that can be held to resolve this issue.
7cr t- 1'i ycca,
1
\
Richard A. Mager I
Executive Director l
Commercial Development
RAM/nc
-RECEIYED-
Ir of RTtICHDQICJINNIN~
aNIWNp gVIBtUN
OCT 101983
~
,a
7,8~ia8
~AL ~o ~A'3-i2 I~OD
,~ ~rr~
~ ~ c- rl/~/B9
~D
1989
CNRpIDL06Y of TERRA YISTA TDNM CEIfIER
Jan. 19, 1969 DRC review of all street furniture
Jan. 19, 1989 DRC review of Modffication to theater
court/entertainment center
Jan. 19, 1969 Planning Camaission Workshop regarding Target store
elevations
Feb. 2, 1989 Planning Comaisslon Workshop regarding Target store
elevations
Mar. 16, 1989 DRC review of hull dings A, B, T
Mar. 16, 1989 Planning Commission workshops regarding Mervyn's
store elevations
April 6, 1989 Planning Commission Workshop regarding Montgomery
Hard elevations
April 6, 1989 DRC review Of building A, B
May 4, 1989 DP.C review of Mervyn's Elevations
May 31, 1989 PC Workshop Mervyn's and Montgomery Nord elevations
Juty 6, 1x89 PC workshop Montgomery Nerd
PC review of modifications to caeprehensive site plan
h xa ~ `
(,.~Fy'&9pt$
OM:sp CHRAUOLDFr/ O~ ~/~.W~
~~ H~f~s
3aS
/98~//9B8
CHRONOLOGY OF TERRA YISTA TOwN CENTER
DRC/PC Review Dates
(PC dates shown Tn bold face type)
October 22, 1987 General DRC review of protect
November 19, 1987 General DRC review of Dro,{ect
December 9, 1987 Development Review 87-39 approval oy P1arning
Coamission
February 4, 198A DRC review of "architectural details" as
required by condition of approval
April 27, 1988 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 88-12 by
Planning Comnissi on
'i7i'
May 19, J.88 6RC review of Mod Rl and Target
June 15, 1988 City Loundl review of Haven Avenue median
island opening
June 22, 1988 Planning Canmisston approval of Modification #1
July 13, 1988 Planning Coawtsslon detenainatton of "regional
center" for purposes of preparing Uniform Sign
Program
October 20, 1988 DRC review of Theater court area revisions (Mod
#2)
NoveaBer 30, 1988 PTanning Comuisslon review of Phasing Plan
December 8, 1988 DRC review of Theater Court area revisions (Mod
#2)
December 14, 1988 Planning ComRtssion review of a revision to the
Phasing Plan
Note: Not include8~in this chronoiogy are Design Review Committee
wo-Treshaps regarding development of sign program.
30~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMA SSION
Adjourned Meeting
July 6, 1989
Terra Vista Town Center Workshop
Chairman Larry McNiel cai led the special meeting to order at 9:45 P.M. at the
Rancho Lcamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga.
ROLL CALL
C OMMISS[ONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Ch it ie a, Larry McNiel, Peter
Tolstoy
ABSENT: David Slakes ley
STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal
Planner; Russ Maguire, City Engineer; Betty Miller,
Associate Civil Engineer; Debra Meier, Staff Consultant
~~ R R R * R
^~ Site Plan Mod ificattons
Tom Bond, of Architects Pacifica, began the discussion by describing the
charges on the site plan as represented in the modification. Mr. Bond
explained that the footprints of building S and P have been adjusted
slightly to allow a view corridor toward Mervyn's. Since these build irgs
`. uVc Gvt hi vuyh 0~>1y ,i nericw yi uuae~iuy a, i.iie iuuiyr in is >i1VU iu
still be considered conceptual in nature.
The Commis Sion suggested that when buildings S and P are ready for Design
Review that such features as a perimeter trellis and landscaping would
most likely be required.
Mr. Bond explained that Pads 1, 2, 3 and 4 are restaurant pads. Pads 1 &
2 depict a final footprint as these restaurants arc known users.
Mr. Bond then 4escrtbed the modification Co buildings E/F and G/M. Each
pair has now been combined into one 6uilding, due to Dercefved leasing
problems of the original design.
The Commission accepted the concept of combining the buildings. Hpwever,
the Conm i; sion expressed concern with the relatf onshtp of these 6uiid ings
to the traffic circle and entertainment center. They do not want to lose
any opportunity to capture overflow from the entertainment center to
buildings E and G. In addition, the Commission expressed concern
regarding the service areas. The building frontage (or appearance of
frontage) should continue around the buildings as ouch es possible. The
final design, including footprint, service arcs screening, and landscaping
must be resolved through specific Gesign Review of building E/F and G/H.
,~dL to ~pBB'll. NADlFIc.4Tmn1
7/6/B'Y CA"1~/«iatl sfiDP MiN~s
3a~
The Commission discussed the possibility of creating a pedestrian corridor
through the east side of the center. Such a corridor could allow
pedestrian traffic from future multi-family resident tai on the north side
of Town Center Drive, as well as direct access to the front of the center
from Lhe parking area at the rear of the shop buildings.
Tom Bond stated such 'a feature could present securi ~y and maintenance
problems.
The Commission reiterated their position that it would be a desirable
feats-e.
Mr. Bond explained that building T was being deleted from the original
plan, as requested by Mervyn's. The Commission did not ob,i ect to deleting
building T.
Staff was directed to prepare a resolution of approval for the site plan
modifications.
Montq ornery Nard
Mr. Bond updated the Commission on the progress of the Montgomery Nard
building elevations.
A. Main Entry
Mr. Bond explained that the transition panels on either side of the
entry had been expanded, as they had discussed at the previous
meeting.
The Commissfon was still uncomfortable with the proportions of the
nnfw Thov ennno<tnA n<1m na1 r~A rn luinna ~n ch.~_m f_Mn •hn
appearance.
Mr. Bond stated that they had looked at that idea and felt that it did
not complement the structural aspect of the trellis, which worked very
simply and elegantly.
The Commissfon then suggested the possi611ity of placing another set
of columns near the building face.
Mr. Bond agreed to pursue that suggest ton.
B. Promenade
Mr. Bond indicated that he had eliminated the kiosk that had
previously been in front of Montgomery Nard within the pedestrian
promenade through the parking lot. He went on to describe the
promenade as tt related to the entry of wards.
Planning Commission Mfnutes -2- July 6, 1989
O
The Commis ston indicated that the promenade should align with the
center of the store entrance. They felt that it world provide a more
complete and finished appearance, rather than looking like an after-
thought.
Mr. Bond agreed to look at redesign of the promenade to achieve the
proper alignment.
C. Kids Stare
Mr. Bond explained the most recent changes to the Kids Store
elevation.
The Commission was satisfied with the level of detail used on the
building face under the arcade. They suggested that the t he accent
be replaced with a sconce light. The Commission also suggested that
the accent tiles used across Che front elevat ton be replaced with
precast quatrefoil designs. The use of the quatrefoil should extent
across the entire Montgomery Nard elevation, in addition to their use
on the Kids Store.
The sig Wage for Kids Store int Ludes yellow letters with purple trim.
In addition, the "i" in Kids ant the "t" in Store are figure
repress ntatlons of children. Also included 1n the overall scheme is a
rainbow striped, colored awn irg.
The Commission expressed opposition to the awning Colors and sign
design used for Kfds Store. They stated that all the Montgomery ward
specialty sig Wage should be consistent with the approved sign program,
with respect to the 24" shop size stgnage and approved colors.
n. Flnr it it aveaia
Mr. Bond described the modifications to Electric Avenue as a result of
the previous meeting.
The Commission was satisfied with the window pattern and the metal
lattice form used within the arch. They suggested that the same metal
mullion pattern De used within the stucco arch features, similar to
window million pattern. within the recess of the arch the darker
gray/beige building color will be used.
The Coewlsslon iMicated to Mr. Bond that particular attention should
De given to the available plaza area east of Electric Avenue when the
adjacent shop buildings are ready for specific Design Review. That
area should trclude, accent paving, seating, and pedestrian features
similar to other plazas on site.
Mr. Bond explained that the stgnage proposed for Electric Avenue is a
red letter with a teal green trim.
Planning Commission Minutes -3- duly 6, 1989
3a9
As expressed earlier, the Commission is opposed to the mix of accent
sign co tars and preferred consistency with the sign program as
approved.
E. Rear Elevation
Mr. Bond described the additional detaf is that were added to the rear
elevation, includ irg the added layer of molding he low the roof tine,
trellis at customer pickup area, metal lattice, and esp altered plant
material within each arch form and the painted wainscot with a
~ullnose plaster trim.
The Commissf on was satisfied with these charges and suggested that, in
addition, the quatrefoil design be included as an accent to the rear
elevation.
F, Auto Express
Mr. Bond described the architectural modifications includtng the
arcade and tower at the southeast building corner, and the addition of
a ports-coc here over the auto entrance.
The Commis Sion was generally sat tsf led wfth the architecture; however,
opposed the accent colors aM sfgnage.
Mr. Bond also indicated that they would need to add an old Lire
storage area at the rear elevation. The storage area would be made of
t10' high masonry walls and metal gates.
The accent color scheme consists of a black and whtte checkerboard
rile fascia along the south and east elevations at the top of the
w indnw lion the mo1a1 f.as aryl winAw nn llin,., ,...~ ...e •~,.
- _... __.. ..._... _.._ -r. ..-, .... .~,.
s ig nage is red and black.
The Commission historically has not favored the use of checkerboard
patterns on building architecture and they expressed their concern
about using such a pattern within Terra Yista Town tenter. There was
mixed react tans to the rcd metal frame and window mu111ons.
Commissioner Ch it tea felt that the color was too strong a shade of
red; however, Commissioner Tolstoy thought that the use was
appropriate. Mt•. Bond explained that the slgnage of the TBA
(Tire/battery/~essory) included "Auto Express", uMeriined, with
"Montgomery Nard" underneath.
The Commission agreed to the verbiage, but stated that the black/red
design was not in conformance with sign program color criteria.
Conclusion - Monta omerv Nard
The general building design, building colors, and materials were approved by
the Commission. the unresolved issues include the Hnal design modifications
Plannfng Commission Minutes -4- Juty 6, 1989
3/a
to the Entry and Promenade, and the "Image Package", including signs and
accent colors. The Commission expressed great Concern regarding the color
package as proposed 6y Montgomery Nard. They agreed that the proposed colors
would significantly detract from the intent of the sign program, and open the
possibility for any and all tenants to use unlimited colors and designs.
Adjournment
The workshop adjourned at 1:25 A. M. July 7, 1989.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brad Bu 11er
Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 6, 1989
~~~
Motion: Moved by To lstoy, seconded by Weinberger, to adopt the Resolution
approving Entertainment Permit 99-04. Motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MC NI EL, TO LSTOY, NEiNBERGER
NOES: COMM(SS [ON ER S: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAK ESL EY -carried
+ . ~ r +
E. MOD ff(CATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES -
' ropo sed various minor revis o ~o E6e si e p an an ui ng es gn o a
previously approved 71-acre shopping center (Terra Yista Towne Center),
that involves such items as ad,ju stment to on-site curb line, combination
of buildings into one, shifting of building orientation to provide view
corridor, architectural enhancement for building edges, etc., for property
lnc ated at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothfll Boulevard in
the Comwnity Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community -
APN: 1077-421-05, 06, and 13.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. She indicated that
Home Depot shown on the map was not part of this review.
In response to a question from Commissioner Tolstoy regarding the approved
phasing plan for the center, Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff would
forward a memo to all the Commissioners regarding the status of the phasing
plan.
Chairman Mc Niel asked the distance from Spruce Avenue to the first driveway on
Town Center Drive.
ws, rong re sp ono ed rt was roughly 150 feet.
Chairman McN iel asked if that was an acceptable distance.
Ms. Fong stated that Engineering policy normally requires approximately 200
feet.
Chairman McNiel asked if the intersettfon of Spruce Avenue and Town Center
Drive will De signalized.
Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated it will be signalized shortly.
Chairman MCNte1 opened the public hearing.
Tam sand, Architects Pacifica, stated Lhey were requesting the charges because
of items addressed in the Design Review process and tenant requests. He
indicated they wanted to coabine Buildings E and G into one building because
they felt tt would make the building caster i:0 lease. He stated ail the items
had been reviewed at Design Review and he understood they had been tentatively
agreed to as betrg reasonable.
Planning Commission Minutes -4- ftC~]!~/l~ September 27, 1989
C~,yPB9-i21~
q/z~~B9 CuMH/6fia/HiuMAl~
3 /a-
Mr. Bond stated they would be converting some of the stalls that are to the
rear of the center and relatively inefficient far patrons to the front of the
center. He said they were having no trouble meeting the City's criteria for
parking, but were having some problems meet irq the tenants' criteria. He said
they ware attest ing to have anQ le Dark Sng by restaurant pad 4 on the
corner. He stated if the parking is moved to the front, approximately 50
spaces would he added to the front.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a tenant had been secured for Building A.
Richard Mayer, Western Properties, stated a tenant has approved the site but
documents have not Seen signed.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there would be future requests to charge
Building A.
Mr. Bond rA sponded no and noted that the foundations are already befog poured.
Ne requested an opportunity to comrent on Planning coed ft ion 5. He De li cued
the conditioned walkway would encourage pedestrians to walk through and into
the service area and increase the possibility of someone riding a bike through
the corridor out into the path of a truck at the nearby Montg ornery Ward
dock. He also noted that the Montgomery Ward pick up door will provide access
to the main body of the store and would enable patrons to pass through the
store. He also felt a pedestrian walkway would coca rage ,l gywalk irg and world
became a security problem. He preferred that the item ba addressed at the
Oes ign Review level and have the coM it ion removed from the Resolution.
Chairman McNiel stated several corridors had already been eliminated and Lhe
City wishes to provide for pedestrian access throughout shopping centers. He
indicated the parking behind Buildings J and K would not be used by theatre
patrons because it is too far removed from the theatres. He said that wfthout
the corridor 6y Building K, the only pedestrten thoroughfare is along Mafn
xreet or througn the stores. He rest that peMaps Lhe loading area Of
Montgomery Ward could be moved if that presented a problem. He felt any
problems generated by the pedestrian walkway could be addressed.
Mr. Bvnd felt there is parking available for shopping patrons and it could be
better addressed at Oesfgn Review.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated that high density housing world be located
directly across the street and he felt they should have an easy access to the
center. --
Mr. Bond stated that they felt 1t 1s better to create a mayor separation
between buildings or not c Hate a separation at all.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would prefer to see a separation, rather than a
corridor.
Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed.
Plannfng Commission M/notes -6- September 27, 1989
3/3
Chairman McNiel stated there are still some questions regarding the TBA
but ld ing as it relates to Major 4 and sig n age, and to light of those questions
the Commission wished to hold approval in abeyance until the issues have been
re so 1 ved.
Mr. Mager stated that placed Western Properties in the untenable posttion of
not being able to resolve the Montgomery Ward location wfthin the project.
Mr. Buller stated the prevf ous meeting was a workshop of design review
matters. He stated the workshop did not consider the Conditional Use
Permit. He stated the modifications to the Conditional Use Permit being
con s'.de red to,^. fight constiL Led the formal action requ tred as a follow up to
the Commission's design workshop.
Mr. Bond asked if the City Ccu ncfl were to deny the appeal of sign colors and
graphics if the Planning Commission would then give approval of the TBA
without the other issues befog resolved; i.e., MaJor 4.
Commissioner Chitiea stated the driveway adjacent to Space would have to be
resolved to the sat isfac Lion of the City Engineer.
Chairman Mc Niel stated the basic configuration of the build irg and
architecture were acceptable.
Commissioners Ch it tea and Ta is toy concurred.
Commissioner Tolstoy stated he was not comfortable with where the building was
going to sit.
Mr. Bond stated they cau ld commit that the TBA would sit where it shows on the
plan, unless Montgomery Ward withdrew from the project, in which case the
~.~~: ,n :..,. ~.rv.lA nn~ h. hni l•_ Ilv RnnA th.n acY.,l if fi4_v run nril ww to
approve the color package requested by Montgomery Ward if the Planning
Commission would then approve the TBA.
Mr. Buller staled that at the Design Review workshop the Planning Conmisstan
gave approval to the TBA but reJected the image /slgnage package. He stated
that~if the package that has been appealed fs not upheld by the City CounC11,
then it goes bade to the Planning Commission for approval of the signage,
mullion color, and tile.
Commissioner Chltlea stated that if the checkered tile, signage, and mullion
color are approved, she would not support that TBA to that location becalse
she feels it would be inappropriate to the center, particularly as an entry
statement, with the Montgomery ward-requested standards. She stated that the
TBA has not yet been approved in that location.
Chairman Mthiel stated that when the sign program was first put together,
Western made a comaitment that they would live up to the sign program.
planning Commission Minutes -8• SeptenAer 27, 1989
~~~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MC NI EL, TO LSTOY, WEINBERGER
NOES: CONMISSION ER S: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESL EY -carried
e e ~ x e
Chairman Mc Niel welcomed the at tend ante of Scout Varsity Team 617 from glta
Loma in the audience. Team Coaches Oenn is Coda and Scott Watson fMicated
they we ~e attending to earn credit toward merit badges for citizenship in the
common r cy.
+ + w . :
F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02E - CITY OF
- request to ame ection nvironme nta esou rtes,
an ection ub lit Safety, elements of the General Plan as they relate
to hillside development and grading and will involve revising the
definitions of hi115 ide from 30% or greater to 8% or greater, as well as
restricting development on slopes which are 30K or greater.
Chairman McN iel ind Stated that staff had requested withdrawal of the
application to allow it to be heard at a later time in conjunction with a
proposed Hillside Oevelopment Ordinance.
Motion: Moved by Ch it tea, seconded by NcNiel, to withdraw Environmental
Assessment and General Plan Amendment 89-02E. Motion Carr ted Dy the fol lowing
vote:
RYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MCNI EL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESL EY
ABSTAIN: CONM[SSIONERS: WEINBERGER -carried
..~~.
G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENOMENT 89-020 -RANCHO
VULN'IURIq ncucruvmcnr IWCII{.T - R request to amend the tarp use Element
o sera an nom ood Control to Cfvfc/Community for 3.15 acres
of lard, located on the north sfde of Banyan Street, east of the Oeer
Creek Channel - APN: ZO1-191-24.
H
nrvc¢w mcn~ nucm., - h rl quest co alll nU WQ dlVe topml nt
ser cts ap nom o on rol to Law Residential (2-4 dwelitng units
per acre) for 3.15 acres of land, located on the north side o/ Banyan
Street, east of the Oeer Creek Channel - APN; 201-191-24.
Plannfng Commission Minutes -10- Septeaber 21, 1989
~/J
,;,
s'
.,
.~
} ,a - .. .
~~ ;`~' ;~
o w ~~~~~~~ ~~~ --~o ~ ~
- ~~' ~ ~ \
~,
~' Y y' .,
' ~ _~ Q_i?T. ~~
~~ _ _ i_. ,a.,
' _ 'I I = ~ ~ I jai. _ ~ ..u~..Y
-a _~..
;: o v ~.,a
~~_ I ~l b9 ~ 1 ~44T~
Ib mm~~~
"S ~~ ~ I Q ~
_- = ~-- -- - _ r --
---.. -- ------- ~LL _ -..~-- -- - --~
--_ - ~ --
._
~~
I / \ I
~~y~~V~
i wJR I R
CITY OF wP ~,
RAI~'CI-ip CL,~C'p;btpl~K-,q Trr~: /r~o~T,E1~Rq Y%57f~
R.A.~vNt~c otvts~oty /~. 9Z18Y exHierr: 7ON' G EK
C~c /i~~~
~//~
EXHIBIT "B"
CUP 88-12 - MDDIFICATJDN
List of Yarious Site Modifications Approved by
Planning Commission on September 27, 1989
A. Modification of Major 2 to incorporate the Mervyn's store.
B. Adjustments to retail shop building edges of Buildings 8 and E,
adjacent to Mervyn's.
C. Adjustments to Buildings S b P to create a view corridor for
Mervyn's.
D. Adjustments to the surrounding curb Tines behind Mervyn's,
including the creation of additional parking and another
driveway to be used as overflow parking for the Theater.
E. The elimination of Buildings T and M to treate greater
visibility of Target and Mervyn's.
F. The combining of Buildings E 8 F and G d H into single
buiidings oy aeieting inter or open-air corridor.
G. The incorporation of Mongomery Ward into position of Major 3.
N. Adjustment to retail shop building edges of Buildings K d L
adjacent to Montgomery Ward.
I. The Incorporation of a Tire/Battery/Accessory (TBA) facility
for Montgomery Nard adjacent to Major 4 Tabled by Planning
CaaaHsstan.-
J. Miscellaneous adjustments of various curb lines and driveway
location to attanmgdate the Montgomery Ward location.
K. Parking area north of Building Al moved to south of BUilding
A2.
L. Adjustment to the orientation of the theater, the theater
court, and the westerly parking lot including the alignment of
the driveway.
3/7
~~ ~
iiigi3 iii i ~~~,
..,..: ,:, 1...
< < << 133
i Y Y II ICL
~ Illill'!1 tll ! ilt 1 1 1
... i .. ..._ t . .
-' - p
~~
;; 9i1i1~ OIBpp1100~
~1[f ply c~ra?e:tel~
< t
9?iidl II,IIitlii~
~::r l)A ' if eii.'
~ I ~;~$
. ~ ~ f4lt '~
ail=~ ~ >>.....~
%/__ ;Q(
/8' ~
J~~ / ~•
~ ~~
/~
JI~ /•%
. ~~~
~~~~~--~
'~ ~ H '"'~
1H
I i ~
7~
~~[
0-9~
P ~ -9
~`J d
-_ ._~
(}Ili
~___ Y ~ ~,
-' L ~ I li ~
ID
1 ~~~
! I~ ~"-~
'~QI
r '~
;, I~
~~ ~ ~ z ~•o
ce or=
o - G ~`•'v
,... ~~_-~ c~
~~
°-----~-~ tI
"-"-' p a
r-J- •1-c-1 ,
_ ~, .9 ~~ ,•_~ I
,..... ~.~ E - `i
3/~
~" r
RESOLUTION N0. 89-120
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCPMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING A MODIFICATION TC COIa)ITIONAI USE PERMIT
N0. 88-12 PROPOSED VARIOUS MINOR REVISIONS TO THE SITE
PLAN AND BUILDING DESIGN OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 71-ACRE
SHOPPI N6 CENTER (TERRA VISTA TONME CENTER) THAT INVOLVE
SUCH ITEMS AS AO JUS7MENT TD ON-SITE CURB LINE,
COMBINATION OF BUILDINGS INTO ONE, SHIFTING OF BUILDING
ORIENTATION TO PROVIDE VI EN CORRIDOR, P.RCHITECTURAL
ENHANCEMENT fdi BUILDING EDGES, ETC., FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED CQB~UNITY AND MAILING FINDINGS
IN SUPPatT THEREOF, - APN: 1071-421-05, C6, AND 13
A. Recitals.
(i) On April 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 88-75, thereby approving, subJect to speciffed corditfans, a commmnity
shopping center on 71 acres of land in the Community Commmercfal District of
the Terra Vista Community Plan.
(ii) western Properties has filed an application for the modification
of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88-12 d5 described in the tit la of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the 5ub~ect Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application".
(iii) On the 6th of July, 1989, the Planning Commission conducted a
Oes ign Revfew wo rkshap at an ad,larned meeting to discuss the design aspects
pf {hP YPV 1<P.n V'~~P ~Ifw• ~M
(iv) On the 27th of September 1989, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded Said hearing on that date.
(v) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred .
B. Resolution. ~,
NOM, THERffgtE, 1t Is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fasts
szt f~rtn in {,he Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution arc true and cornett.
2. 8axd upon substantial evidence prexnted to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings On July 6, 1489 eM Septemm6er 27,
1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Coaatssion hereby speclftcally finds as follows:
..
3/9 ~xk<~~T n
wa.u twit ION N0. 89-120
CUP 88-12 - MESTE(G ,20PfltT[ES
Septeaber 27, 1989
Page Z
a. The application applies to property located at the
northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage
of t2, 700 feet and lot depth of t1,440 feet and is presently in various stages
of construction; and
b. 'fhe property to the north of the subJect site is an office
complex under construction, the property to the Bath of that site consists of
an office conQlex, the property to the east is vacant lard and the property to
the west is an enter talnment/office complex.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
durirq the above-referenced public nearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as fol laws:
a. Th zt the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the ob,t actives of the Development Cede, aM the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
b. That the proposed use,' together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially in3urious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code.
4. TA1s Commission hereby finds and certifies that the protect has
been reviewed and considered in rmm~tian'e ~!!. .hc ;;,~,,,,iia environmental
v,,,;1Ly ncc or 1910 ard, further, this Commission hereby issued a Negative
Oeclaratfon on April 13, 1988.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application su63ect
to each and every condition set forth beiow.
Planning Division
1. AT?' pertinent Conditions of Approval as
contained in Resolution Nos. 88-75, 88-118, 88-
236, and 88-236A shall apply.
2. Any buildirg footprint depicted on the site
plan that has not received Design Review
approval by the Plannlrg Coaialssion, shall be
considered conceptual in naturo.
3. At the time of Design Review of Buildings S and
P, the inclusion of perimeter trellis and
laroscape features shall De incorporated into
the architectural design, to the satisfaction
of the Planning Comaniss on.
3~
PLi a _ul IR H0. 89-120
CUP 88-12 - wESTE~~PROPERTI ES
September 2I, 196s
Page 3
The rear elevation aid service areas of
Buildings E and G shall be designed to the
satisfaction of the Planning Commission. An
appearance of a bui ldirg frontage shall
continue around the rear of the bui iding as
much as possible. The final design, including
footprint, service are screening, and
landscaping, shall be resolved during the
Design Review of these two buildings.
5. A pedestrian walkwdy shall be provided through
Building K. The corridor shall be designed to
the satisfaction of the Planning Commission
_ during Design Review of Building K.
6. The incorporation of a Tire/Battery/Accessory
(T BA) facility for Montgomery Mard, adJacent to
MaJor 4, is not part of this approval, as shown
in Exhibit "A."
Ergineerirg Division
Driveway location adJustments shown on the
madffied site plan are acceptable, sub,lect to
the following:
a) The easternmost driveway on Town Center
Drive shall be relocated westerly such
il,a~ L1,e eesl CYgC ui 1.lle Yr IVCIIay Ip a
minimum of 200 feet from the BCR far
Spruce Avenue, or as otherwise approved by
the City Engineer; and
b) The northerly driveway on Haven Avenue
shall 6e separated from the sottherly
driveway by a minimum of 300 feet,
meow red at driveway center lines; and
c) The southerly driveway on Haven Avenge
shall cOnfona to Cfty Council Resolution
Ho. 88-410.
All applicable landxaping and street
improvement plans shall be revised to reflect
the driveway relocations aM approved by the
City Engineer prior fo f1na1 map auaeMalent,
issuance of building permits, or iswariee of
encroachment permits, whichever ocars first.
3a~
TION N0. 89-120 _
CUP 88-12 - NESTEI JROPER TI ES ~ N
September 27, 1989'
Page 4
3. Parcel Map 11030 shall be amended to bring all
non-vehfcuiar accesses and ingress/egress
easement locations into conformance with the
Conditional Use Permit as modified.
6. The Secretary to this Tpmmission shall certify to the
adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27tH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989.
PLANNING COMNI SIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r~ n L ~ ~ n
ATTEST:
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commisslon of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregotrg Resolution was duly and
regularly introAUCeu, passed, and adopted by tDe Planning CommlSSian of the
City of narKno Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 2ith day of September 1989, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA; wrwrci~ T'~L$iGi> wt1N8ERGER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
,3 2-a
RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ,'~ l
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLOI NG A
CONDITION REQUIRING A PEDESTRIAN NALKNAY THROUGH BUILDING
K AS IMPOSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL
OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 NITHTN
THE TERRA VISTA TONNE CENTER, LOCATED AT 7HE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BWLEVARD, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-,05, O6, AND
13.
Recitals.
(i) Western Properties has filed an application for various
modifications to the Conditional Use Permit No. 88-12. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "the application".
(11) On July 6, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a Design Review workshop at an adjourned meeting to
discuss the design aspects of the various modifications to the site plan. On
September 27, 1989, the Comm{ssion conducted a duly noticed public hearing.
Following the conclusion of said hearing the Commission adopted its Resolution
No. 89-120 thereby approving the CUP 88-12 modification subject to certain
conditions.
(iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission
Resolution No. 89-120, Condition 5, was timely appealed to this Council.
/...,
1 ~~/ •a~ Vf iW ,c,lY/CI, LJ VJ, lllli 1.11J' VUUIKII 1. UIIUUl. 4tlU a
duly noticed public hearing with respect to such appeal and concluded said
hearing on that date.
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NON, THEREFORErit is hereby found, detennlned and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1, This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing on November 1, 1989, including
written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
northeast corner of Naven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage
of 12,700 feet and lot depth of 11,440 feet and is presently in various stages
of construction; and
3a3
CITY CWNCIL RESOLUTION N0.
CUP 88-12 -MODIFICATION - TERRA VISTA TOWNE CENTER
November 1, 1989
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is an
office complex under construction, the property to the south of that site
consists of an office congle x, the property to the east is vacant land planned
for High Residential (24-30 units per acre) and the property to the northwest
is an entertainment/office complex; and
(c) One of the site plan nod if ications consists of combining
Build irgs E and F, G and H into one building and deleting the interior open
pedestrian corridors. These pedestrian corridors provide a north/south
connection for the future multi-family north of Towne Center Or~i ve, the
theatre and the shopping center to the south; and
(d) There are over 140 park irg spaces located at the rear of
the buildings in this half of the center, most of which are concentrated
behind Building "K", with no access to the storefront entrances. Providing
pedestrian access to these parking spaces would encourage their use and
promote a shorter route for employees who would typically park there; and
(e) There are over 500 mn It i -family dwelling units planned
across the street which would benefit from a more direct access into the
center; aM
(f) The site plan for the center differs significantly from the
original Terra Vista Community Plan concept in which the greenwdy trail system
led directly through the heart of the center all the way to the corner of
Haven and Foothill to encourage pedestrian patrons by separating them from
vehicular traffic; and
(g) The Comm nity Plan envisioned this center as one in which
clustered buildings ",joined together by covered walkways sheltering
pedestrians" ark: "masses of the various buildings in the center will be
divided so as to be human-scaled and not appear monolithic"; and
(h) A pedestrian corridor is a desirable amenity and feature
that needs to be provided at the east side of the center through Building K.
Su rh a corridor will a11rnr pedestrian traffic from the future multi-famf ly
resident tal as well as direct access to the front of the center from the
parking area at the rear of the shop buildings.
3. Based upai *.he substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced ou6lic hearing and upon the spec iffc findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes that the pedestrian walkway would be consistent with the objectives
of the Terra Vista Community Plan, Development Code and General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal.
3~ Y
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989 L-~F
T0: City Council and City Manager ~-~l •~
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
SUD.]ECT: Public Hearing regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire public
right-of-way for the Cucamonga Storm Drain, Phase I, located at 7785
Vineyard Avenue (APN 208-091-23) for the construction of storm drain
improvements across said property.
RECONENDATIOM'
Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing
staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-w>1y for the construction of the
Cucamonga Storm Drain, Phase I Improvements adjacent to 7785 Vineyard Avenue
(APN 208-091-23) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
BACK6RODID/ANALYSIS•
This is an Eminent Domain action to acquire right-of-way for the Cucamonga
Storm Drain, Phase I project. The project limits are between Cucamonga Creek
Channel to 1300' east thereof.
TFn_ anelnl~~ Mvn.~n nt wo. ta'11 AIA ...~ .AA-.... -C •~- ,a-.-~
at 7785 Ytneyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. Through a ~hired~investlgator, Mrs.
Pestels' exact whereabouts cannot be verified. At this time, we have been
unsuccessful in contacting her. Mr. Pestel is in agreeance with the City's
proposal, but the property in question 1s to joint tenancy.
The storm drain project mentioned cannot be completed as planned, without
acquiring a five foot strip of land aiong the southeast side of this
property. The City is willing to offer just compensation for the appraised
value of said property.
Notice of Intent's were mailed to the Pestel's and all parties having alien
against the subject property on October 13, 1989.
Respec tfulla~~u~iS~d,
~,~~~~~
RH •TAN•
Attachment
3aS
NOTICE OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RAMCHD CUCAlDIDA TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ff NECESSITY TO
CONDEIN A PORTIdI OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTT LOGTED YITHIN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGAIDIN9A, CALIFd1NIA, ASSESSORS PARC0.
N0. ZOA-091-23 Fpt THE ALI6INENT, CONSTRUCTION AID
IMPROYEIEMI' OF TIE CULAMd1611 STORM DRAIN (PHASE I1
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of Civil
Procedure section 1245.235, the City of Rancho Cucamonga intends to consider for
adoption a resolution of necessity to condemn, for a storm drain improvement
project a portion of that certain real property commonly known by the street
address 1785 vineyard Avenue, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Assessors Parcel No.
208-091-23 ), and which property is further described by the legal description and
the map depiction attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
The hearing by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
consider the adoption of said resolution will be conducted on November 1, 1989,
at 7:30 p.m., ar as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Council
Chambers, Lion's Park Community Building, Lion's Park, 9161 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that, pursuant to California Code of Ctvil
Procedure Section 1245.235, 1f you desire to appear at the ebove referenced time
nA nt, in aiA An .In Hm Fe nA •M m, HO Fnlln
a ~n w • a ~ .mu .",v a nn r< ae
-.... r.-~~ ~. ~- .-. ~~- ~ __ ~_. _.. ..._ _• _ __ _.._.
1. Hhether the public Interest and necessity require the project;
2. Hhether the project is planned or located 1n the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and,
3. Hhether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the
project.
To appear and be heard on any of the above referenced items, you must file
a written request to appear within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
Notice by filing or delivering a written request to:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Base Line Road, Suite C
P.0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamenga, California 91730
3a~
Failure to file a written request to appear and be heard as outlined above
can result, by law, in a waiver of your right to appear and be hoard at the
hearing.
For further information, contact:
Mike Olivier, Sertlor Civil Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Base Line Road, Suite "C'
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
;714) 989-1862
Dated: C~(~Od ail ~ ~ l9E`I a! b'A.~S~fof~, ~?~u.T4
DebFa ~? ams, y ~C1e I~T-
2
3a7
OECLARATIOR OF RAILING OF NOTICE dF IMiERTIOM
TO CdNIE1M PROPERTY
DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby declares
as follows:
That on October 13, 1989, I walled, by fiat class mall, postage fully
prepaid, a copy of the attached "Notice of intention of the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Adopi a Resolution of Necessity to Condemn
Real Property Located withtn the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
Assessors Parcel No. 208-091-23 for the Alignment, Construction and
Improvement of the Cucamonga Stone Drain (Phase 1) to all persons owning an
Interest to said parcel whose property may be acquired and whose names and
addresses appear on the last equalized tax roll and anyone who, to the City's
knowledge, has an interest 1n said property. The names and addresses of all
persons to wham said notice was walled arc set forth on Exhibit "1" attached
hereto and Incorporated by this reference.
I declare under penalty of penury of the laws of the State of
California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration
was executed this 13th day of October 1989, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
~ a Q un ~5 tttlm.., 1 '~n.vfil
Debra .Adams, City Clerk ~
1
3~
E101IB[T 1
Paul U. Pestel
7785 Vineyard Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Judy A. Pestel aka
Judy P. Somers
P.O. Box 124?
Upland, California 91785
JuQy A. Pestel aka
JuQy A. Somers
c/o Fasson
9292 9th Street
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Thomas Shirley and Alice SM rley
588 South 7th Street
Grover C1ty, California 93433
Franchise Tax Board
P.O. Box 2952
Sacramento, Cal ifornla 95812
County Treasurer-Tax Collector
Hall of Records
112 Mest Th1rd Street
San Bernardino, California 92415
~~
RESOLUTION No. 8 (- 5 ~'
A RESOLUTION BF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCANONBA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEEO AND
NECESSITY TO COIWEMI A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED IN TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA
ASSESSORS PARCEL ND. 208-091-23, AMD W1KIN6 FINDINGS IN
SUPPdtT THEREOF.
A. Recitals
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining
to the alignment, construction and Tmprovement of the Cucamonga Storm
Drain (Phase I) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to
as the "Protect"). Based upon such analysis, it has been determined that
the most reasonable and feasible plan for alignment, construction and
improvement of the Cucamonga Stona Drain (Phase I) will require the
acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commonly known by
the street address of 7785 Vineyard Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and more particularly described 1n the attached Exhibit "A".
(ti) Pursuant to California Government Code 4, Section 40404(b), a
City may acquire private property by condemnation when it 1s necessary for
rights-of-way for drains, sewers, and aqueducts;
(ti/) Oii~epa"~ fn fMa nmvl elnn< of ~alifnrnia nnyernwnnt 1'nAe
Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution the City has made an
offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount
of fair market value as established by an independent appraisal valuation;
(iv) On November 1, 1989, this Council held a duly noticed hearing
pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1245.235 and said boating was concluded prior to the adoption of th15
Resolution; and,
(v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of
this Resolution.
B. Resolution
NON „THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foliaws:
1
330
SECTIdI I: In all respects as set forth 1n the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution.
SECTIgI 2: That the real property which Ts required for the street
improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the Ct ty of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more
specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTIpI 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
Council during the above referenced public hearing, including written and
oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows:
a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed protect;
b. The proposed protect Ts planned or located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least
private intury:
c. The property defined to this Resolution is necessary for the
proposed pro,{ect; and,
d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of
said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code
Section 7267.2.
KMTiW A. TLS ~N.. u~u ~Il L`.... L.. d~~lu ~i ~t.'. i t~ tiv
. y ~u~ u~
acquire the property described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in
eminent domain. The City Attorney 1s ordered and directed to bring an
action to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
San Bernardino, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against ail
owners and claimants of Lhe property described herein for the purpose of
condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary
to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the
provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and
instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the
ampunt of serurity by way of money deposits as may be directed by said
Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of
said real property for the uses and purposes herein described.
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
2
33/
r •
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION FOR
PAUL J. PESTEL AND JUDY A. PESTEL PROPERTY
APN 208-091-23
A 5 FGOT STRIP LOCATED NORTHWESTERLY ANO ADJACENT TO THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF
Wav, BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY 5 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PARCEL:
THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF A PORTION OF LOT 6, SUBDIVISION "C"
CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CAL2FORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 OF MAPS, PAGE 67,
TN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 0
DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY SIDE OF VINEYARD
AVENUE, 204.37 FEET; THENCE EAST 179.85 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION
OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY
RIGHT OF MAY; THENCE SW TM 41 DEGREES 28 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF
WAY 70 THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
P.n1I8IT ^A"
33a
APN 208-09/-~
i
~ AT,'Er
--
POR. COT 6,
SL'B ~C"
i
i
A^G ?/ ~n7 j
. .~... /
C/TY OF R4ibCYlO CUG~7MONGA
PESTEL PFir?/~EETY
APN 206- 09/ 23
N
£:t/f/Bl T
A~
n: rtn n
~` r
o
STAFF REPORT ~~' ~~.~
_L---
197
DATE: November 1, 1989
To: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Diane O'Neal, Administrative
SUBJECT: Coneiderat ion to Adont Reao.
I[ is recommended the accompanying Reeolution be adopted approving the City'e
participation with San Bernardino County Ln the preperat ion of a Regional Air
quality Element.
BACKGROUND
The Air Quality Management plan (AQMP) was adopted by the California Air
Reeourcea Boaid (GARB) on August 15, 1989. The control meaeuree in the AQMP
propose a wide variety of means for acnieving the goals or regional moon rt y,
balanced growth and cleaner atrr including local air quality elements. AL1 of
the measures have a legal mandate to be implemented.
Councilmember Brown and the Planning etaf£ attended the preliminary
implementation meeting for the AQMP on Wedneedayr October 18, 1989. San
Bernardino County ie proposing a cooperative effort to meat the first phase
mandated by SCAgMD that local jurisdictions adopt air quality elements that study
and develop polic lee to reduce air pollution. A work program has been outlined
which explains acheduking, citiaen pnrticipat ion, technical end advisory
committees and an aet imete of each city•e proportionate coat for preparing the
element. Tha approach of a coopetat ive effort among eurcoundln9 cities and the
county of San Bernardino to study anfl develop policies to reduce air pollution
is a more coat effective method than individual effort e. The attached Reeolution
formalizes our cooperative commitment to participate in the Regional Air Quality
element.
Finally, Section 4 of the attached Reeolution tequiree the City Council to
designate one elected official from the Council to serve ae a member o£ the
Adviaory Committee to facllltete direct Clty involvement Ln the element.
Do:j la
attachment
J
33~
RESOLUTION N0. 89-'~"~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO
CU CAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARTICIPATION WITH SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY FOR THE PREPARATION OF A REGIONAL AIR
QUALITY ELEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING AIR QUALITY
WITHIN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve
as follows:
'WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San 6ernard ino County,
California, is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), the agency responsible for monitoring and
reducing air pollution for the South Coast Air Basin.
WHEREAS, the SCAQMO has adopted a 1969 revised Air Quality Management
Plan (AQMP) for the purpose of setting forth a comprehensive control program
that will lead the South Coast Air Basin into compliance with all Federal and
State air quality standards including the Federal Clean Air Act.
WHEREAS, the AQMP has proposed that cities and counties within the
South Coast Air Basin adopt air quality elements as part of their general
plans.
WHEREAS, the preparation of an Air Qualf ty Element is desirable to
provide for the safety and welfare of the community by promoting physical
development and economic Growth that is comoa ti ble with reoi onal air anal itv
standards.
WHEREAS, a regional approach and cooperative effort with San
Bernardino County, SANBAG, and other San Bernardino County cities within the
South Coast Air Basin will greatly improve the efficacy of the policies and
strategies in achieving the goals of cleaner air and compliance with Federal
and State standards.
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has requested
participation in the d~velopnent of a Regional Air Quality Element to more
adequately address air pollution in San Bernardino County.
WHEREAS, joint participation will greatly reduce the cost of
preparing an air quality element or other implementation far each affected
j VriSdirtian,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The City agrees to participate in the preparation of a
re gian al ai rT qua qty element.
SECTION 2: San Bernardino County will be the lead agency for
preparing a reg onal air quality element and envirorvnental documents.
ass
Resolution No. 99-*+*
Page 2
SECTION 3: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will allocate funding in the
amount of 5,9 .00 to 311,990.00 dependent upon the final cost of the
program, to be transferred to the County.
SECTION 4: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will authorize a member of
the City Counct'l to represent the City as a member of the Advisory Committee
to be coordinated by San Bernardino County to facilitate direct city
involvement in the Element.
SECTION 5: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will authorize the Planning
Director or his designee to represent the City as a member of the Technical
Committee to be formed and coordinated by San Bernardino County to facilitate
direct city involvement in the Element.
3 /~°
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1. 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: BTATOB RBPORT OR GRAFPITI RB![OVAL -- PILOT
PROGRAM AT BTB: BTRBST AND SAERR AVBRO6
Baokground
On October 4, 1989, City Council approved a pilot pro ram
for private graffiti removal in the vicinity of 8th Band
Baker. Within a few days of City Council approving the
pilot program, Maintenance staff made contact with personnel
at the Santa Fe Railroad to seek permission to enter the
railroad right-of-way. At that time, permission was grant-
ed, and a flagman was assigned by the Railroad to the City
at no charge to the City.
Analvsia
..i ~y eau piuueeueu W remove Lrees, shrubs and Weetls to
provide a safe work area for City and work-release
personnel. This allowed graffiti removal to commence on
October 11, 1989 with completion occurring an October 12,
1989. As of October 26, 1989, the wall has remained free of
all graffiti.
As a second phase of the program, staff set up a meeting
with the City oP Ontario staff in an effort to jointly work
together in kee{aing graffiti to a minimum in both cities.
The City of Ontario was vary supportive of Rancho Cuca-
monga's position, and did agree to keep the adjacent area
free of graffiti, and if graffiti for any reason was not
removed in a timely basis, all that Rancho Cucamonga staff
has to do is to call the City of Ontario, and they will
remcve it i.-~~mediately.
s fully~mi ed,
erry B. f{LLF//J7u''lwood
Deputy City Manager
JBF/pr ~ ~
- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: LARDBCAPB M1IINTSl111MCB DISTRICT RO. 1 COMCSPT
FOR BDBDIVIDIMO FOR C7IPITAL I![PROVBNRRT
On October 18, 1989, staff presented to City Council a
concept for utilization of the $120,000 for capital mainte-
nance projects within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1.
However, this concept did not fully address implementation
of a capital improvement program which is the other pressing
issue. The following concept further defines implementation
of a capital maintenance and capital improvement program.
eunn~ i
Staff will seek funding sources for the remaining $407,000
unfunded capital maintenance projects presented at the last
city Council meeting. This would bring the landscaping
throughout the district up to current. City standards for new
construction. Additionally, it would save future assessment
maintenance dollars that could be used for other maintenance
purposes within the district.
e 2
While funding sources are being researched, staff would
utilize resources to determine major capital projects
throughout the City, their cost, and who would benefit from
them. At this point, the Landscape District would be
subdivided on a capital improvement basis to address these
projects and to clearly reflect all such projects within the
City.
LaIiDBCAPB MAINTENANCB DSBTRICT NO. 1
November 1, 1984
Page 2
Phase 3
A final determination would have to be made to either
proactively or reactively complete capital improvement.
The proactive stance would direct staff to actively approach
property owners to see if they would be willing to absorb
higher assessments on a short term basis for completion of
capital improvements within their area of benefit.
The reactive stance would direct staff to make the programs
known throughout the City. Staff would assist with capital
improvements when requested by property owners.
During June of 1990, staff would present the final project
for implementation based upon City Councils direction.
Re pectfully submittDed, -//AJ
i ~i~~~~
erry B. Fulwood
Deputy City Manager
JBF/pr
.~9
nrmv no n ~ ern on wn ~ vn~rn .
5TAFF REPORT
DATE: November 1, 1989
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Report on truck route designations on Haven and
Milliken Avenues.
It is recoawended that the City Council review the information contained
in this Staff Report and receive input from the public on this subiect to
determine whether additional truck restrictions should be placed on Haven
or Milliken Avenues.
BACKGROUND
A request has been received from the Homeowners Association of the
Caryn Planned Caawunity for the deletion of truck routes on Haven Avenue
and N111iken Avenue south of Highland Avenue. Both of these streets are
now designated in the Municipal Code as truck routes from Fourth Street
north to Highland Avenue. There is currently no truck route designation
on these streets north of Highland Avenue, thus truck restrictions do
exist on those oortinne True .,.ut^~ !r, t!:c Ci ••• ~~ - -
a ..2~c ~"Laui~aiieu under
Ordinance No. 373 1n 1988; restrictive signing has been installed in many
parts of the City and the completion of sign installation is currently
under way.
The establishment of Truck Routes on several north/south streets through
the City was done to provide reasonable access across the City and
between the two state h1 hways traversing the City. In the future the
industrial area will need access to Freeway 3D, which will be provided
along the same truck routes. The attached map indicates that the truck
routes in the City aP€-limited to "ma,lor" or "major divided" arterials in
the non-industrial part of the city, with a couple of exceptions. The
truck route ordinance was presented to the Public Safety Commission far
approval and then to the City Council for adoption. There was no
opposition expressed at any of these meetings.
ANALYSIS
Truck routes are limited north of Base Line Road t0 two unrestricted
truck routes along Haven and Milliken Avenues and two restricted truck
routes along Carnelian and Archibald Avenues, the latter befog restricted
to trucks with shorter trailers.
~d
C[TY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRUCK ROUTE DESIGNATIONS
ON NIIVEN AND MILLIKEN AVENUES
NOVEMBER 1, 1989
PAGE 2
In all cases the arterial streets in the City are designed to withstand
the traffic loading of trucks meeting the weight requirements 1n state
law. This fact hawrver, does not legally preclude the city from
establishing weight limits on any of its Streets. The basic truck
ordtnance itself is based on this ability of Cities to limit the size of
vehicles on its streets.
Any change in the current designations of truck routes would require
amendment of Chapter 10.56 of the Mwdcipal Code.
Resp~c lly submitted,
SRN :PAR:Iy~
Attachment
3 ~/
v 1
C``
~nVr'
rl \
1
Z
--~~~
w ~
yl O
~ m
J -~
2 ~ }.
ti
J
C
< ~
a J
z y,
o h
3~~
h
~
Z
~Q
QV Q
W~ ~ h
v~ 2
~~ F
W ~'L W a
~ ~"
~
~ ? z
~
[ 00
•
I
~ U
II
•
1 U~
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 10-18-59
WE WOULD ASK THAT YOL' PLACE ON THE AGENDA FOR THE HEFT
A': AILABLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OUR PROPOSAL REGAEDIhiG
.. ,,.,.: POUTES CPi `I: LIKEN A'/ECiUE AN^u HIGHi.ANC AV'cNUC.
'd5 HA'vE ALL 9EEN FIGHTING TOGETHER TG SECURE A PEACEFUL
ENVIRONM EtiT FOP. OURSELVES A.ND GUR CHILDREN WITH REGARDS
... .,.6 ROCK CUARRY. NOW WORKING [N OUR BACK YARDS. THE
.,. .: HAS ~P'eNT HOOPS EXHAUSTING EVERY EFFGRT TO STOr .'HIS
.;ITR;:S:CN. THE RESIDENTS ARE ALSO SPEAKING OUT. OGR
PRO?OS_ A~_:'U )THE CITY COUNCIL iS TO ACT BEFGRE, NGT AF"i 6R,
..~.~Fi6~&F~l9T WE ARE FACED WITH ADDITIOANL TRUCK TRAFFIC
GF A MINIMUM GF 450 ~° ROUND TRIPS EVERY DAY IN AND OUT
CF THE MIMING SITE. WE ARE ASKING THE CITY OF RANCHO
CU CAMOF7GA ALONG WITH THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERS TO STUDY AND
ACT FOR A DEL ITION OF MILIKEN AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE AS
A TPUCK RGUTE. IN RECENT DAYS I HAVE COUNTED NO LESS THAN
'O '".....,,... ~G li:v i•i :.LiKEiv nnu 1uKNING ONTO BAN'i AN OR HIGHLAND,
THE NOISE AND VIBRATION ALONE IS T00 MUCH OF A BURDEN TO BE
PLACED GN HGMEOWNERS OF CARYN OR VICTORIA.
GEOLOGICAL REPORTS WILL SHOW WE ARE SITTING ON AN
ALLUVIAL FAN. THERE IS NO HARD ROCK UNTIL YOU GET DOWN
FURTHER. THE DUST AND BRUSH YOU SEE cON A CLEAR DAYS
SITTING DOWN ALONG THE ID FREEWAY I5 THE TOP SOIL FROM SHE
rr"OGTHILLS AFTER YEARS OF BEING WASHED DOWN. OUR STREETS,
ALTHOUGH ENGINEERED TO HOLD TRAFFIC WILL REQUIRE CONTINUED
+lso*i
MAINTANCE WITH THE 'FROCK TRAFFIC THAT WE ~ SEE FROM
THE Gi.ARRY S:'. 3. ._ .R... -.. ,. ,q7,i~•, ^-~f; ni ___ ._-, _ .-. '.-
3 y-3
%'OAYERS WHO HAVE $EEN FIGr.'_:ia: .:i 1; .. _:,r:::. :.__:.,.__._,.. ~ _
WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GO TO NORM JOHNSON AND ASK HiM TO PAY
FCP, ROAD MAINTANCE. WE KNOW THIS :£ '•';THiN 7HE SCOPE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL AND CAN BE ACTS; UPON. IN BUNT TERMS
CADDIES Atr^ GENTLEMEN. WE CAN PL"I' IT TO HiM BEr CRE He
PUTS :_ _., US AGAIN.
8' HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY NOW TO STOP THIS BEFCRc ii GETS
~.,, _:.G. ..~ :^.UST` CAScS LATER IS NEVER BETTER. WE NEED 'iC
AD7RE55 THIS ISSUE NOW.
THANK 'fOU FGR ALLOWING ME THIS OPPORTUNITY ANC FOR YOUR
CONSIDERATION - I THANK YOU.
CHARLES L. HAYNES,PRESiDENT
CARYN HOMEOWNER ORGANIZATI~O _/~
3~~
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 1, 1969
T0: City Council
FROM: Charles J. Buquet II~~~
Councilmember
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REDUCING NO%I OUS FUMES AND
SMOKE EMITTED 6Y VEHICLES
This memorandum is in regards to the attached Resolution which identifies our
commiLaent to reducing noxious fumes and smoke emitted by vehicles.
At the last City Council meeting, October 4, 1989, I requested a Resolution be
drafted for Council's approval regarding plating a high priority on our law
enforcement strategies to reduce the number of smoking vehicles and to also
decrease the number of expired vehicle registrations. My intention in proposing
this Resolution is to encourage all cities within San Bernardino County to adopt
same or similar resolutions in order to effnr r; unto .,,d~.~o ~m„~;.,.. ,.,.w r..i ... ..,.
decrease the number of expired vehicle registrations.
Rancho Cucamonga's City Council has always placed a high priority on our
community and I believe we can continue our commitment to a better environment
by adopting the attached Resolution.
CJB/do
3 ys
RESOLUTION N0. 89-'~'•~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REDUCING NO%IOUS FUMES AND SMOKE
EMITTED BY VEHICLES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes
air pollution as one of the most obvious and potentially harmfui by-products
of modern life in Southern California and knows no poiitical boundaries and
significantly affects the lives of each of us who live in this region; and
WHEREAS, nowhere else in the nation is the air as bad as ours and
although progress has been made, our failure to attain Federal and State Air
Quality Health Standards exposes ourselves and our children to an unacceptable
health risk and potential cost the gravity of such risk is only now becoming
fully appreciated; and
WHEREAS, scientists now believe technology exists to achieve Federal
Clean Air Health Standards which can eliminate emergency episodes of
particulates from soot and smoke which reduce visibility and penetrate deep
into our lungs; and
WHEREAS, in time, we can meet the Federai standard for ozone, our
most serious air pollution health threat and the most difficult problem to
control; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires a
proactive enforcement approach be initiafoA ~~ fsrt`,:~ iauuce air pollution by
++i r., ~clr~ emitting noxious fumes and smoke from their vehicles and
citing those vehicles with expired license registrations; and
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is
committed to improving the quality of life by reducing the noxious fumes and
smoke emitted by vehicles and places a hf gh priority on decreasing the number
of expired license registrations due to non-compliance with State Vehicle
Emission Standards.
NUW, THERE FORE~..t he City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve and encourages all cities within San Bernardino County to adopt
same or similar resolution, banding together to effectively develop and
implement a program to site violators and ensure compliance with state
standards as part of overall law enforcement strategies to reduce air
pollution.
3 y~