Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990/02/07 - Agenda Packet
0 :i sy ~~ CITY - /\ /\ T T' !V TT l.lJ U l'VT 1,1L I I A~ ~I`I ~A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. February 7, 1990 lions Park Community Center 9161 Base line Road rN~N.~N ~..UYyIIV~~6Y ~ ~ A City Gouncilmemben Dennis L Stout, ntnyo. Pamela J. Wright, Caunrilmembrr Deborah N. Brown, Mayor n.. rrrn Charles J. Buquet, connrilrnrmDer William J. Alexander, counrnmemDrr •~• iack L nm, r„y nrunngrr James L. Markman, as Artnrnrv Debra J. Adams, air orrk City OOttt: 989-1851 [JOro Park: 980-3145 City Council Agenda Pebrunry 7, 1990 PAGE All itees srbsitted for the City Comeil Ageadt enat De in rritine. The dudliae for snheitti¢q thus iteea Se 5:00 p.e. oa tAe Madwaday prior to the eutivg. The city Clssk•a office reeaigs all auc6 ital. I I I A. cAla. xo owbN 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Plag. 2. Rall Call: Briquet _, Alexander _, 6tout _, Brown _, end Wright b. ANNOUMCOOWTB/PR68mrrATI0N8 1. Presentation of 10-year Service Pin to Commiteioner Ada Cooper. 2. Preaentetlon Of Proclamation to Mdres (Andy) Solorzano. C COMIDRICATID•e tRdl TLt PVNLIC Thi• Le the tlaa aYd place for tke ga¢eral pYDlic to addroas the City Comcil. Mate lar proDlDits the City Comcil true addrataleq .Yy iaaua aot pHrlOYely soelmw m ca. Mlevw. the City Council uy zecelre bati~aay aria sN tM salter !or a eubaegaut reling. CaNe¢ta aro to M lieited to fire eiautss par LWiHdual. D. CONamI't CALEIIDM The tollorlnq Coaua! G1aYdar itNS ara •spected to 6e routine aYd a0Y-eontroruafal. 72y rill M aetad Ypaa Dy the Comcll at ow flan rithout discuasioa. AYy itw uy a reamed 6y a Cou¢eiLaanber or eeeDsr of tDe audiuw for disanuion. 1. Approval of Minutest January 3, 1990 January v, 1550 (baguet aDaenL) Januszy 17, loon (wr,.wn eheeni) January 4a, 1990 2. Approval of warrants, Ragiater Noe. 1/17/90, 1/20/90 AND i 1/31/90 and Payroll ending 1/17/90 for the total amount of 54,560,841.75. i ti ~J City Council Agenda February 7, 1990 PAGE 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule 1~ ) ae of January 31, 1990. 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice 24 Inviting 81da• for the Area IZ, Amethyst Storm Drain and Street Improveawnta, PhaN I Improvement Project, lOCated on Amethyst Street from tM Fira Station and north of 19th Street to Richland Awnw, to M funded free i Drelnage Puntl, Account No. 23-4637-8865. 25 RESOLOTION NO. 90-043 A RESOLUTION OP T06 CITY COURCIL OP 2HE CITY OP IWICHO COCAMONUAr CALIYORNIAr APPROVING PL71H3 AND BPECIMCATIONS FOR TIR •AAE11 II AMETHYST STORK DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I, IMPROVEIRMT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTBORIYING ANO DIRECfINO TfII CITY CLEM TO l1DVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to awud and authorisation to esecuie contract 29 (CO 90-019) !oz iho Haven Avenue Oatsway Entry Monument improvement Project located at tM mrtMaat Corner Of 4th Street and Havn, Avenue to Ronald Narrie COnetruM ion [oz tM amount of $201,397.00 ($183,037.95 plus 104 eontingency), to M landed with Baaut !!Station Funds ACCOUnt No. 23-464'/-e'/lY (PY tlY/9U). 6. Approval to award end authorisation to execute a 35 Profanianal Servico Agreement (CO 90-020) with respect io the aurveyinq of Public Norka Design and Construction projects ai various locatlom in the Clty to Wagner Pacific, to M tended fray tM various project accounts at the agreed hourly rate. 7. Approval to award and authorisation to execute a 36 Protoaional Servico Agreement (CO 90-021) with Auatin- fouat Aawelatu, Incotporaeatl, far • eralLic study for the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan uea. TM conaultant•a tee w111 M $30,000.00 to M funded Eraa e 530,000.00 deposit ads by tM Caryn Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-041 3~ A RESOLUTION OF THt CITY COUNCIL O- THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, TO AWARD AND EXECU'M A PRO!'[88IONAL SERVICES AURtiIOHT WITH AUSTIN-10U8T AD80CIATED, INC. FOR PREPAMTION OF A TRA-FIC STUDY FOR TID< PROPOSED ETIWANDA 110RTH SPECIFIC PLAN AREA City Council Agenda February 7, 1990 PAGE e. Approval to award and auihozi:scion to execute contract 38 (CO 90-022) for Naintensnce Retrofit Project end the Parka Capital Retrofit Project to Taylor-at.afer, Sncorporatad for the amount of $5ai,ilb. uu (pea2,uii.bu plus 30\ contingency), to bs funded from Maintenance Account No. 03-4617-7043 and Park Development 1Lnd - Account No. 20-4532-7043. 9. Approval to emend contract (CO Bfi-055) for legal 53 services. 30. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 3 (CO 88- 56 084) with ASL Conaultinq Enginwre to provide additional engineering orvicee for eupplearntal studies required by the San Bernardino County Tlood Control Oletrict Eor Hermosa/Church Storm Drain. The Change Order la for the total amount of $12,003.00 to bring the contract tot el to $105,874.00 to t» paid from Drainage Punde, AccounC No. 23-4837-8781-4803-4110. 11. Approval to execute Agreement for Installation of Public 57 Improvement and Dedication (CO 90-023) between Roee Mart Lnez and th0 City of Aencho Cucamonga !or etrwt frontage improvements along 10298 Church Street. AasoLaTioN ta. 90-045 58 A RE80LUTION OP THE CITY COUIICIL O! Tf7B CITY or RN7CB0 wcANONGA, cALIroRxIA, ACCEPTING Ax AOREEMEMf roA INSTALLATION OP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION PROM ROSE NARTINLZ AND AUTHOAIL SNO THR MAYOR AND CITY CLERE TO SIGN BANE 12. Approval to execute an Agreement for Acquisition (GO 90- 59 G24j oz Off-cite Property, Security, and Deposit for Tentative Tract No. 33812 located west of Etiwanda Awnw and north o! Highland Avenue, euAeltted by Natt Southern Gllfornla, Incorporated - 9tonegate. 60 RBaOWTION NO. 90-048 A REHOLUTION OP THI CITY COUNCIL Of Tito CITY :e IUINCHO CUCANONGA, CALIroRNIAr APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OP O-1-BITE DROPERTY 86CUAITY, AND DEPOSIT PDA TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 13812 PROM MATT 80PfIRRN CALSroANIA, IN_~RroRATED .~. BTONEOATE AND AUTNORIEING THE NAYOn AND CITY CLEAE TO SIGN EAME r-r~~~ \ y~ ~ ~} ' I r.. / City Council Agenda Pebrvazy 7, 1990 PAGE 13. Approval to execute Maintenance Agreement (m 90-025) 61 between Neirick Properties Limited, and the City of Aancho Cucamonga for the maintenance of an overflow channel along with the replaeament end reoa it of fenefna and landscaping within tM City Drainage Saaamant located uo wuthweet corner of Lomita Court end Archibald Rven ~ i RasoLUxzon No. eo-oa7 ~ 63 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP T88 CITY or RAncRO wcAMOeaA, cALIPORNIA, APPROVING TRH MAINTHNANCH AOREElRNT NITR WHIRICR PROPBRTI88 LIMITED, dOR PARCEL MAP 12504 14. Approval of lease/purchase sgreement with Municipal 64 Services Oroup, Incorporated for two (2) uphalt patch trvcks. RE90LUTI011 NO. 90-049 65 A RssoLUTION or THE cITY COUNCU os TNa ezxx OP IIANCBO CUCAMONDA, CALIIORlIIA, AUTRORIEIRG TID3 LHA9E/PURCM9E OP HQDIPMENT T®30UON MUNICIPAL 9ERVIQE OROUPr INC. u. apprarai ro aucnonae purcnaq or a pprabricatw bb restropa building, a goner 9ecF!x !!c!e1 ~ -11x5-c for a the Htiwsnda High School 9porta upgrading project Eras sole worts vendor Nalt Rankin and Aewciates. 36. Approval of Pilm permit )wa. 67 69 RESOLUTION NO. 90-049 A RsaolotxoN or Tas cITY wuNCIL ~P rMS clTx OP RAiiCNO CUCANOIpA, CALIIORIRA, ADTNORIEIRO CERTAIN P[H9 A8 OOINED IM ORDINANCE NO. 410, CHAPTER 5.19 PERTAINING TO TiQ lILMINO PERMIT PROCE89 •.. Approval to Ootroy Cicy OoCUmenta a provided under iG Government Code 9eciion 34090. 7 ~ ti City Council Agenda Pabruery 7, 1990 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 90-050 JS A ABSOLUTION OP T86 CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OT PANCNO COCAMONGAr CALITORNIAr AUTMOR13Iiw TBS DESTRUCTION OT CITY AECOADB AND OOCUlRNTS N9ICH ARE ND LO116ER AEQUTAEO AS PRDV20® UNDER WV6iA70LWI CODS SSCTIOiP 36090 18. Approval io ratabliah en amount raquirad of • dwrlopmwnt 79 as a conLrlbuiion Sn-11w Of tha conatruttion of aeea Lines Aoad atraat NLdaninq snd Nadisn Ialanda from waei of Intrretate 15 to Victoria Park Lmr. 83 RESOLUTION NO. 90-051 A RESOLUTION OT THE CITY COUNCIL OT TIDe CITY OT RANCHO LRCANONGII, CALIlORNIA, 68TABLISHING AND A[M)PTIN6 A COIITRIEOSION AMOOIIT PERTAINING TO TH6 CONSTRUCTION OT TII6 EASE LING ROAD NIDENI116 TAON NEST OT INTERSTATE 15 TO VICTORIA PARE LANE IN THE CITY OT RANCHO CUCAMONGA 19. Appcovaa of Raaolutlon conlirrlnq a Clty Council dacialon 85 madr on January 17, 1940 for an appeal of Planning Caamiaaion Co~Mitiona rrlatinq to 6nvironmantal auoamanc and wndicwnai uaa rarmic odvo - uivnrair iav ahoppinq Centrra. RESOLUTION NO. 90-052 96 A RE8OLUTION OT TIHi CITY COUNCIL OT TFIC CITY 0! AANC/IO CUCANONGA, CALIlORNIAr APPROVING CONDITIONAL U9E PERMIT a9-3a TOA THE OEVQ.OPMENT OP A TAST IOOD ABSTAORANT TOTALING s, 190 900AR6 TEST oN 1.2• ACRES OT LAND off TxE EAST SIDE O- FIAVEN AVENUE BETIREN L61gN AND HmMtaxro Ava~DEa IN zxs NExaeeonxoGD caDOZRCxA1 Dxaxaxcr, AND NAxxNa rxrroxNGa Ix SUPPORT T!D<REOT -APN 201-27i-66 AND 67 ~ 20. Apycoval Lo ortlar the ann.ariinn of OR 88-i4, lecatad an 10: the nortA rides of 19th etramt, art of Ramona Awnur, to Landwapr Malntananca Diatritt No. 3 and 8traat Lighting Nalnbnannr DSatr1M NOa. 1 and 6 -APN 202-171-31, 32 and 35. }~., City Council .#genda Pabrusry 7, 1990 PAGE RESOLOTIOH HO. 90-053 lO4 A RESOLUTION OP THR CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RAHCRO n, ~rat10NPA, rAT.TMPPTR, OPnvorwr mPP ANNEEATIOq O- CBATAIN 1RARITORY TO LANOSCAPS MAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING HAZiiTSNAWG SZSTRICT NOb. 1 AND 6 POR DR 66- 19 u • %+PPeovai to exeeuw .-~proveme ~C Agzesment sad Improvement 10] SacurLLy for 13181 Victorl.• 4treet, submitted by James Banks, Jr. 109 RBSOLUT:JN NO. 90-054 A PESOLUTION OP TIHG C_TY CDUIICIL O- THS CITY Of RANCHO CUCAIWNGA, CALIIORNIA, APPROVING fNPROVElgNT AGASEIOHPf ARD INPAOVSMENT 9ECURITY POR 13181 VICTORIA STREET 110 ?2. Approval of Napa, execution of improvement Agremrent, Improvement Security and Ordering tM Annexation to Street LigAtinq Maintenance District Hoe. 1 end 3 for Tract ]380L end parcel Msp 1]394, lOCated at the northwest corner of Baas Line Road end 8elwanda Avenue eudnitted by TLa earmakian Company. ~ 112 RESOLUTION NO. 9D-055 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COOHCIL OP 1775 CITY OP RANCHO CUC.UtONCA, CALZPORNIA, APPROVING ~ IMPROVS!ffiNT AGRBP.l7RNi, INPROVSNENT SECURITY, ~ I AND FINAL NAPS OP TW1CP NO. 33866 ANO PARCBL NAP NO. 11394 113 AEE000TIOx hn. -^-ose A RESOCOxwN oP THE cimr co7INCIL or THE cixx GP RAMDNO CVCA)N7NGA, OA:.IPORNIA, ORDERING THE ANHNYATION OP CER"'AIK TEdRITORY TO 9TASST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HOE. 1 AND 3 POA TRACT !3856 AND PARCH NAP 1]394 23. Approval of Map, arecutlr9 of Improvement Agreement, 116 Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape MalntenanN District Ho. 3 and 8CrNC Llghtirq Maintenance Dirtrict Nc~. t cad 6 foe Parcel Map 12038, loeaeM south o[ 9th SuNt between r,~en 8erwt and Hellman Avenue, autxmitty~ by RanCt9 BualMee Partners. .,.. ~_.~.~ 1__ 1'. L7,, ~,• ~ ^i' ~r r CSty Council Agenda pebruary 7, 1990 PAGE AaBOLVTION NU. "0-057 117 ~ A R85OLOTION OP Tea CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OP R11HCN0 CVCANONGA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NO!®ER 12050 (TENTATIVE PARCBL MAP NO. 320581, INPROVEMEn? ACREElRNT, AND YMPROVBMHNT 9HCURITY ~ AEBOLTITION 110. 90-058 118 A REBOL0IIJ:. OP Ti6 CITY COVNCIL O! TN6 CITY OF RANCiW CUCANOP:A, CALIEORIIYA, ORDERSNG TMY ANNEIATION G7 CEATAI,N TEARITORT TO LANOBCA_nE MAINTEIDll1CB DIETRIG NO. 3 AND 9TR~T LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOB. 1 AND 6 POR PARCEL MAP 12058 2d. Approval to rxecuts Improveeent A9roelwnt Extension for 121 Tract 12571-3 tAru -e lw-ated on t'~r nortbsest corner of Milliken Avenw and Nountain V1eM Orlve submitted Dy Lew1e Nomes. I REBOLOTION NO. 90-059 123 A RR8OLOTION OP TEE CITY COVNCIL OP TeE CITY . ~ ~ O! RANCNO COCAM.ONOAr CALIPORNIAr APPROVING IMPRUVENEAT MiRaaMEBT EATE119LOA ANU iMPROVmOi,YT BECVRITY [OR TNACT 17671-1 TIDiV -~ 25. Apprcoal to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 12Q Tract :7597 locatetl on tDe soutOMest corner of Haven AVSnw slut Carrari Street submitted by Daly Nomee. RaSOLOTION NO. 90-050 126 A PSAOLOTION 01 T~ CITY COVIICIL O! THE CITY OP itANCMO CUGIMOIIPAr CALIIOMIA, APPROVING IMPAOVLRNT AGEtEMENT EETEEBIOE ANO IMPROValRRT 9ECORITY pOR TAACT 13597 `[5. tpprooai co exscau tmprovement Agreement extension for i2i Tract 33715, loested an tM nortMUt corner o[ Jennei Sheet and Exeter Court, sadeitted by Nalton Construction Corpany. 1 i 5"` s,, (~ 1 City Council Agenda February 7, 1990 PAGE R680LUTION NO. 90-061 129 A R890LDTION OP THE CITY COONCIL 07 TSB CITY O! N1HfCR0 COCANONGA, CALTPOANIA, APPROVING iMPROVEMEMT AOAEBMENT SETBNSION AND IMPROVE!lOQ7P BECOAITY TOA TRACT 13715 '<7. approval to azaeuG isprooemeni AgrewanL Extmdon for 130 DR 56-27 located at 9133 linter street, submitted by California Piniehad Metal. 132 AESOLOTION N0. 90-062 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY WVNCIL OP TM6 CITY OF ]UfNCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVLRIiT AGRBBMENT EETLNSION AND IMPAOVilRNT SECDAITT POR DR 36-27 23. Approval to erecute iluptowant Agreeoent Eaendon for 133 Haven Awnue Isproveoenta loeated on the art •ide of Haven Awnw between Church EtrNt and Baae Lin• Road submitted by iwML Hoswe. AESOLOTION NO. 90-063 135 A RESOLOTION OP THE CITY COONCIL OP TB! CITY ~. ,w~ww ~M„wM1Mw, iiVMin, n{'fnVY\eU yv SMPROVLIRNT AOAEElRIIT EETENSTON AND IItPROVEMENT SECURITY PDR MVBN AVENUB IMPROVEMENTS 19. Approval to accept Improvaewnta, Releue o[ Sonde and Notice of Completion fort Tract 9225 located an the northwrt corner of Carnahan Street and NSehLnd Awnue 136 Faithful Performance Fond ~etreet) $119,000.00 13J RESOLUTION NO. 90-06A A AESOLLTION OF 27R CITY COONCIL 8P TiS CITi OP NANCNO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TN6 POBLTC IMPROVE1aNTE FOA TMCf 9225 AND AOTIIORIEIN6 THE OILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR Tot NO]U ^.~i~-~~ City Council Agenda FeDtuary 7, 1990 PAGE CUP 84-39 (DR SS-071 located ^-^- th. asat Bide of I 138 v^~aee~.r Awm±. hetveen 4th A~reet snd 6th 3trwt Faithful Performanee Bond (Street) $ 21,000.00 139 RBSOLOTION NO. 90-065 A ABSOLPIION OF 1TQ CITY COIINCZL OP TB6 CITY OF AANCBO LVCANONGA, CALIFOAl1IA, ACta Fi'i:::. TAn PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 84-39 (DR 68-07) AND AUTBORI rINC T86 FILING OP A NOTICH OP COMPLETION POR Tim NORR 30. Approval to sccept Improvement •, re Lau of Maintenance 140 CuaraniN Bond for TsaCt 12033 located on the eouthwet Corner of Victoria Park Lana and South VSMO:ia Nindrowe LooP• Maintenance 6uuanttl Bond (Street) $ 64,936.00 31. Approval to accept tM VLntage Park Pro]wk in tae 147 Victoria Planned Co®unity a complete and authorise the I { tiling of a Notice of Camplatlon. I RBSOLOTION NO. 90-066 142 mn~,w n. TAa nTTV fYNINf:TT. 01 'LNe CITY O! RANCBO CUCANONOA, GI.IFORNIA, ACCEPTING TIB3 PUBLIC IMPROVElBNTS FOR TBE VINTAGE PARR PAQTLCT AND AUTISORISINC TIR FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR TH6 MORE ^. CONIe1l ORDINANCiE The lollariny Osdleancee have Oa4 pnhlLe heatiaga ef. the tiae o! liret reedlAq. second reedlaye are eNpected to M routine and aos-coatrovereial. TaeF ML11 Da anted apon Ey !ae ConaC11 at ew t!r Nithoet OLerneeion. T-e CLiF Clesk rill read the title. Aay items ew b reeovW !or diaaaaeion. l~ ~ noeeum anAARML`.MT 87-01 ORY11T NBSTGRH BOTi2.$ 743 ~qti - A request to awnd the Agraeeant to allow a hotel MLthin the Foothill Design and Commercial linter located mouth o! Toothlll Boulevard and Beet of Spruce avenue. ~'. PAGE city Council Agenda Psbruary 7, 1990 10 OADINANCB NO. 415 (second rsadinq) 143 AN ORDINAMCE 02 TBE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OD RANCHO COCANONOAr CALIPOANSA, APPROVING AMEIIDM6NT NO. 1 TO AN EII STING DEVIIQPlDLNT AGAEElOLNT POR A HOTEL NITAIp T8Q POOTAILL DES IGN A9D COIOQRCIAL CENTER 147 ~.-- •- -. _ _ _..~.,~- ~~., n....+..e.,..m ,.+..a >veanrewm 09-02 - CITT O! RANCHO CUCANOMOA - An aarndarnt to Tlt la 17 of the Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.24, Sections 17.24.010 througG 17.24.090, 17.04.O10.C.S.g and 17.06.020.0.62 amending subsections 17.06.O30.E.5, 17.08.O40.H and C, 17.OB.OSO.E. S, 17.18.020.D, 17.18,030.A, 17.18.030. C, 17.18.040. A. 1, 17.18.040.E. S. a, and 17.38.040.8.5.62 and deleting eubeectione 17.06.010.6.S.a through f, 17.18.040.A.1.• thtough • and 17.18.040.6.5. a.i thtough io, rsgsrdinq sstablishwnt of guidelines and standards tot hL11siM dePeloyaent. ORDINAMCi NO. 616 (second reading) 147 AN ORDINANCE OI TN6 CITY COUNCIL O! TN6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORMIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE A!®IDMENT @9-02, AMENC2N4 TITLE 17 O! TBt MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDZNO ~rii.i i.:. i7.2C, -iiG::o -. - - ~ ~ ~ 17.24.090, 17.06.O30.C.1.0 AND 17. 06.020.C .62 AM6NDIMq 9U996CTIONB 17.06.O10.E.5, 17.08.040.8 AND C, 17.08.050.6.5, 17.38.020.D, 17.18.030.A, 17.18.630.0, 17.18.040.A. 1, 17.18.040.6. S.A, AND 17.18.040.6.5.82 AND D6I.LTINO SUB86CTIONB 17.06.O10.6.5.A TIDIWGH P, 17.18.040.A.1.A TNROU6N 6 AND 37.18.040.6.S.A.I TNROOOH IV, AWAIIDINO 68TA6L298M6MT OT OUIDELIN6S AND 9TANDARDB /OA NIITAID6 D6V62APlRMf, Ai1D MAEIN6 PIND2N68 IN SUPPORT TIQAEOP !. ADV6lPIem PD6LIC Q2IRINOs The tolleeinq it4ms bees heeo adeertissd a~/er posted ss public borings as ragsised M lar. The ohale rill open the meselnq W rnel.e psb3ie LeetiwnP. ,5. ~, c PAGE City Council Agenda February 7, 1990 11 MAP 11030 - NEBTERN PROPERTIES - M appeal of a Planning Coamiaalon dkiei.y. do :yl:.g .. ..y..--., t0 w`di"p' 1 - ---•-°* - condition of approval requLrlnq that traffic signals ba constructed prior to occupwcy of any Duildinga Lor Gha development of a ehoppi0q cantor and related Pueal Map located at the mrtileart corner of tlawn Avenue and Foothill mulavud - APN 1077-411-36, 37 and {0. 2. 152 1 7 062-04 lII5 PESOLOTION NO. 90-067 A RESOLUTION Of T10 CITY COUNCIL OP TSE CITY OP RANC8O COCAMONOA, CALI)`0Al1IA, RECOMIRNUIN6 APPROVAL OP TeE COCAMDINiA DEPOT, LOCATED AT 6IONTN BTAEET AND ARWIBALD AVENDE, A8 A LANDNAAE - APN 107-061-04 9. 9'0ELIC EiAEYNOe TAe follorlag iteu ova m legal pebliutlon or posting requirareots. TYe Chair rill owe tM erstiag to receive punssc nacsmomy. i. TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LENIB RO1Dl8 - An appeal of the 18~ Planning Coaminlon'• decision to deny a request tot e time eEtenmlon for a residential auDdivialon and design reviep of 96 a1ngL Easily lots on 13.98 scree of land in the Terta Vleta Planned Comuaity designated Low- Medlm Density ({-e dwlling unite per acre) located st tM southwest rnrner of Tessa Vista Pukway and Mountain View Driw - APN 117-151-13 and 1{. (COalSauW Eros TaaaarY 17, 1990) AE8OLOTION NO. 90-038 201 A REe0LUTI0N OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP ft1111f1N) CUtJ1aONDAr CALI90MIA, DENtINO 1111 APPSAr. Dr 1TR PLANNYNd caaleexoN•E DECISION To DENY A TIME EEI7NEIW1 roR tENTATM TRACT NO. 13303 - APN 217-151-13 AND le, AND MARINO PINOIN66 IN 80PP0XT TBiPYO1 PAGE City Council Agenda HDruary 7, 1990 12 e. clTr lBlltlw~•s sTArr HHroHxs The folloriny itsY do ¢ot legall] regnin an] pnDlic t.stie¢¢], ue¢s¢ga t¢s caair as] ¢pY w. w.L:r.-y .,.. g__._ Sapat. 1. 9TATV9 3LPORT ~( Ylt9E ti+au OR_nlllxwCE A9 RECC742.~ED TO TBH CITY COOI(CIL BY THE POBLIC 9ABETY COMMISSION (COatiaaed fam 0scest,sr 6, 1919) (OA11I. EFFORT) 2. NE-ESTABLISH CABLE TV/DOHLIC ACCE99 203 I. 205 1. ABI'OAT ON ANNEYATIOH H9-02 6TINANDA NOATA -Annexation of 206 approximately 5,600 acne of territory generally located nortR of 21th BirYt and Yat o! the extYaion of Milliken Avenue -statue update and request for Council 9ulroomittY. x. Domes maIEHSH ZLe follovl¢q f.teY Wye beY sequeelM b] tke Clt] Council for diseuuioa. Tkq are ¢ot pablie Maslag iteaa, Qthoaga the Club Y] opY tM meetlaq for p¢Elie i¢pat. 1. BTATtl9 REPORT OM AECYCLIN6 BZLL AA 2040 (CYtioned from 210 JanYr] 17, Iff0) 2. OPDATE OM tl9H Of RBCYCI.ED PAPER (CYti¢ned tram Jeawr] 219 1'7, 1990) 1. naYORT ON Clnt¢taT CITY STAnIA_¢D8 fOR aTRi7xT NIOTH LBNCTN 22 ~~^,CE88 RELATZVE 1'O TBE OPEAATiON 09 6NERnENCY 1 __ _ VEIIICLEH (CYt1enW free Ibreeber 17, 19e9) 1. HTAEM' N11NIN0 - Report on the status of the City•s 224 current atrNt neminq policy. (CO¢tl¢¢ed ftam JaaYr] 17r 1990) 5. RPPOltT 071 THE I!O?/• !TTATICN C] THE pROVZ9ZOHa OY pGH•~IC Z71PSfgYHIQNTB AEOfIIAE1QNTB fOR OdgO2RCIAL/INOtlHTAIAL/ INHTIIRITIONAi. HtlIL0IN68 Z40 rACie City Council Agenda ' Pabrvaty 7, 1990 13 6. CONSIDERATION OF A R630LOTION 20 DPSIGNATE A DELEGATB AND -NIDE RC ID TASR 245 TE TO ERVE ON A a PORC6 AS REODIRSO ONDEA AB 939 - TB 939 cvquirea a task V-.... `r-. ° k^ •-".. wz..::: cwaulunLioy cm cevelopment V • requiraa cites Lo prepare a ecurce of AB 939 Mhich reduction anC rorycling clamant. 248 AESOLUTZON NO. 90-068 A RESOLOTION OP TBE CZTY CODNCIL OP TR6 CITY OP AANCt97 CIICANONGA, CALIPOANSA, APPRWZN6 10Sl~HRSNIP OP A SOLID NASTE TASR PORCs REQDIAED ONDEA A.B. 939 AND DESIGNATING A AEPR69ENTATIV6 101D ALTSIG7ATE PODN TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CDWWNGA 249 7. NORDIC DPDATE 8. OISCOSSIC91 oP NAYS TO LIMIT TNi LR7GTN OP CYTY COONCIL NEBTINGS J IDAPTIPICATIOM OP ITAfs POE OBIT M66TI116 This La tM tiae for City Cooooil to idaotify the itama tha• Nish to dLanas at the not meeting. TMs. itaau rill out M aiacnaaan as rasa NaeL3Dg• osly 1aM.ftiea So! tAa Gait maetioq. E. CONNIIICATIONE lAdl TA6 POALIC This is the ties and place for tM general peblie tc address the City Coeuoil. state laN prohibit. tM City Council iros addressing wy iaaw out prePioasly loclnded oo the Agenda. The City Cooocil say raceire tasLLaony aad sat tM matbr for o subaagnest Neetlog. Cc~ants are to M lfaiiad to flee mieatea pee isdieidnal. AOJOOPNN~ON! L . 103E7IMG TO 1YlODNN TO ErECVI'I9E NisEIOM REOA71DIE6 TE6 EAMIVIALYTD COND0OpTI0M, 10005-10099 AEEON ROOTE. E1'ECUTI9i sEStIOM TO 10.TOD101 10 JOIET IaTIEO NITA TE6 sAECE0 CDGIIOIIOA COIEIOEITY POUMOATYOM pl PESEWIRS 14, 1990, 7x00 T.M., M' TO EAMCW COWIOMOA IRIOEi010~OD Csl~ .~ 9 e~ae City Council hge~Wa tabruaey 7, 1990 14 ~- _T I I, nehra J. aeame, City Clerk of the CU_y o! Baacho Cucamo::qa, ~ herehy certify that a troy, accurate copy of the lozyoi.^.g sganaa Maa p6aYN Da Ld,L YYLy 1I lY9VI w BSI-Gn.. , i , prior to the meeting par OoverllMnt Coda 56953 et 9320-C Beea LSne Road. 'te`n January 3, 1990 CITY OP IUINCHO CVCANONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Aewlar Meeting A regular meeting of the City Council of tM City of Aancho Cucamonga mot on Wednesday, January 3, 1990, in the Lions Pnrk Community Center, 9161 Baee Line Road, Rancho cucaannga, California. The meeting sae called to order at 7s30 p.m. 6y Mayor Donnie L. Scout. Present were Councilmambern Willtam J. Alexander, DaDOrah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Nright and Mayor Dennis L. Stwt. Also prevent wares Jack Lea, City Manager; Jaawe Markman, Ciiy Attorney; Linda Daniels, Deputy Ciiy Manager] Jerry hlwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Comex, Cammunlty Development DlrectoY; Brad Buller, Clty P1aMKj Dan Coleman, Principal Plennar; Miki Brett, Aawelate Planner; Alan Warren, Auociate Planner; Rue• Maguire, City EngLnssr; Paul Rougeau, Traftic Bnglneary xlke Olivlsr, Sr. Civil engineer; Baity Miller, Aasociats Civil Engineer; Jw Stoua, ~•~~-~=-~ - ~ =.•viuoci oez'ry wranc, wzaa>.ng Oirzeial; Jim Martin, Plen Check Coordinator;•Jlm Hart, Adminietrat ive Servicea Directors Joe Scl.ultz, Commun!ty Servicea Managers Patty Riffel, 8xecutlve Aea;etan[; Diane O'Neal, Adminietrniive Analyst; Susan Mickey, Adminietrat ive Aide; Chle£ Dennle Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fira ProLeetion District; Lt. Bruce seiner, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Departvrent; end Debra J. Adams, CLty Clerk. • • • w x B1. Preaentatlon at S-year Service Pins to Co®;eelonar Ray NcIlvain end Councilwoman Pam Nright. Preeentationa acre made to Councilwomen Nright and Coeaaiasiansr My McIlvsin by Mayor Stout. ConmLsioner McIlvaln presented a Aend carved plaque to Mayor stout and the City of Rancho Cucamonga which ha had made in tM Philippines. B2. Councilwoman Brown stated that at the commuter roll vacating Coday, tM first cut toe train stops wu made and that Rancho Cucamonga au one of tM oven stops. City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Page 2 B3. Jack Lam, City Manager, asked that the minute of November 28 (Joint Clty Council/Planning Commission) Da removed from the ngentla until the Planning rr.~.n{... _. -____ =mar .~ ....:.... B4. Jack Lam, City Manager, seked thnt item 011 ba pulled from the agenda and would return when nppropriate. 95. Jack Lam, City Manager, corrected infezz:ntion in the aiaff report far Lteo u2G o~o~iuy^ '..o.. ...:.ompa:.y :aw :Youid he Mariborou9h Development. B6. Jack Lam, City Nonage::, atnted chat the Council had before than an addition which was to oe made a part of Ordinance 412. B7. Sack Lam, City Manager, stated that Ltem D18 should also be removed from the agenda. R R • • C1. Marlene Arnholt expressed her concerns for the traffic situation for the proposed shopping center at Foothill and Lion Street. Mayor Stout felt her concerns mould be appiopriata for [he Planning Ca~teeion to consider. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated this project Se in the Deginninq stages. Jack Lam, Clty Manager, elated stelf would prepare information for the Planning Commission to consider when this matter qws bafots them. Mayor Stout asked Lor the people on the list to De notified of anything regarding this project and that the Planning Commission be made aware of the reeldente' concerns. C2. Diane Nil llama, 7251 asuthyat, reed the following letter "January 3, 1990 Mayor stovi and Memhere of tM CLty Council xc hoe came to the Board's attention the[, contrary to eha City Couneil•s discue4 ion lase May 3, the !naue :ogatdiag tY.a dty and cwnty division of reapomibllities [or library services Y.ad rat been determined and would Da discuued openly in public in iM near future. There hu ban no public tliscuuion which the City Council Md indioalad would occur regarding whose role it would De, tM city or the county, to provide future library arvicaa in Aanoho Cucamonga. CLty Council Hinuto January 3, 1990 Pages 3 It le apparent that the County by default or Dy design nre, in fact, designing a regional library to meei chair nerds first and the needs of the cit Sxana of PeneFo a,ra-,~ ~_ ----.±, We ask you again, ae we did on May 3, 1989, ^Ie it tae intention of the city to permit the County of San Bernardino to operate the future library in Cenral Park7" Sincerely, Jeffery W. Young President iriende of the Library P.O. Box 1162, Alte Loma, California 91701" Mayor Stout asked that thin matter coma back before the City Council nt their next meeting. x x D. COIIaQP CALEEDaE Dl. approval of Xinutes: HMembec 28, 1989 November 28, 1989 (Mienles Nsfovad) November 29, 1989 December 6, 1989 Decasdxsr 12, 1989 (Nright absent). 've.:~iuea su, iioi 02. Approval of Narrante, Register Nos. 12/8/89, 12/13/89 and 12 /20/84 end Payr~11 ending 12/7/89 for the total amount of $2,628,515.82. D3. Approval to receive end file currant Investment Schedule as of 12/23/89. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Appllcetlon for On galas Cenesal Bat inq Place for chili~a Grill 6 Bar, Chili's, Incorporated (P-12 ), 747 feet pet of the northeast corner o! loothill eoulevacd end Haven Avenue. D5. Alcoholic eevazage Application !or Off Sale Beet i Nine foe Hrs. P's quick Cuisine, Earl J. III and Eriaten A. Pritchard, 8045 Vineyard Avenue, Onit 6. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Bala Beer F Nine Eating Place for Salsitsa Moxican Crill, k - an6 Doluria L. Compern, Vincent N. and euzanne Y. Padua, 10540-A 84N Line Aoad. D7. Alcoholic Beverage Appl Scation !or Off Sale Oeaeral for gatehouaa Llquora, Elizabeth Louisa Dickey, 10277 loothill &wlevard. ~: City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Page 0 De. Approval to authorize the advertising o! the "Notice Inviting Bide" far the Rochester Avenue Haa! Side Parkway BOauL1ElCaLion Improvement Project Lunde, Account No. 21-4647-8935." RESOLUTION NO. 9D-001 A RESOLUTION OP TF'J: CITY COUNCIL 08 TH8 CITY OF RA1:CH0 CUCANCAGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA THS "ROCEB9TBA AVSHOB BAST SIDS PARKWAY BEAUTIFICATION IMPROVEMENT PROJBCT BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD", IN SAID CITY AND AUTRORILING A11D DIRECTING THE CITY CLEAR TO ADVERTISE TO ABCBIVH BIDS D9. Approval to authorize the advertieinq of the "Notice Inuit tng Bide" for the Arrow Route Street Improvement end Signal Upgrade at Haven Avenue Improvement Projects, from east of Hermosa Lo Haven Avenue to be funded from Systems Development Fund Account No. 22-4637-0858 end TDA Article B Account No. 12-4637-0831. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-002 A RBSOLVTION Ol TlDS CITY COUNCIL OP TBE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANE AND BPECIPICATIONS POR THE "AARON ROUTE STREET INPAOVEMENT AND BIGNAL UPGRADE AT HAVEN AVENVE IMPROVLMENT PROJECTS", FROM EAST OP HERNOSA TO HAVEN AVENUE, IN 9AID CITY AND AUTNORIEING AND DIRECTING 'a'HE ~aa: waN aw ,wvanaasn a'u aeuaava eaua D 10. Approval to redeem bonds, publish and mail Rotice of Redemption for prepaid Aeeeasmenta within the 6Lh Street Industrial District (82 -1R) for approximately 525,000.00. bnmfer-pe3as-: ITEM REMOVED 17Ip1 AOOIDA. D72. Approval of Parcel Map 12506 located at thn southwest coiner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue submitted uy Wairick Properties, Ltd. RESOLUTZON NO. 90-003 A RSSOi'~aiOH OF TiDi CiTf COL7iCSL OF CiIY Gi RAHa:dO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUNBBR 12504 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12504) D13. Approval to open escrow with Rollin and Ann emlth for purcAase of Lnd at 4322 Etiwanda Avenw, to obGln the right-of-way for the Base Line Road Nldeninq Project between Victoria Park Lane and Interstate 1S for 844,000.00, plus escrow coats of $2,500.00 to W paid from systems Development !NS Account No. 22-4637- 8731 and authorize the City Engineer to execute all neCOelry dOCUmenL •. Clty Council Minuses Jnnuary 3, 1990 Page 5 D14. Approval to authorize contracting with two interne to assist with the preparation of computer equipment to the Civic Canter to to funded from Contract services Account 33-4130-6028 for approximately $5,000.00. D15. Approval of Btiwanda North 8nvironmentnl Impact Report Consultant Contract - A request to approve Letter Amendment Numoer 2 (W 89-041) for ra~~lred additional services by NLchael Bzendman Associates, Incorporated in the amount of $68,500 A0. Said funds Rave been deposited with tha city by the applicant. D16. Approval to execute Recreational Joint Uae Agiaement (CO 90-001) with San Bernardino County Plood Control Diairict for Co®unity Troll Purposes on Alta Loms Storm Drain and Altn Loma Basins No. 1, 2 and 3 and authorising the Mayor to sign same. D17. Approval to award and execute contract (CO 90-002} for Aree V Hil hide Aoad storm Drain, Phase II, Improvement Project located between Archibald Avenue and Alta Lome Channel to c. S. Cooke, Incorporated for the amount of 5334,281.00 ($303,892.00 plus l0a contingency) to W funded with Drainage Panda, Account No. 23-4637-8862. ITOI Rp1OVRD PROM A00ID11. .-.. :.~dr0: 1i t' ...:.-..-- ;.y.~..~~..: ... ..iali~u wi iuLiiu rmpmvemvnr ono Dedication (W 90-004) between B. Lorrnine Malloy and the city of Rancho Cucamonga Eor street frontage improvements along the property at 3783 Arrow Route, for the Baker-Arrow Route Storm Drain end Street Reconstruction Project, RSSOLOTION NO. 90-004 A ABSOLVTION O! T77R CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONOA, C1ILIPOAN2Ar ACCBPTINO THB AGASHlDINT POR INSTALLATION OP POBLIC IMPAOURMBNT AND DRDICATION FAOM B. LOAAAINR MALLOY POA THI 9ARRR-ARROII ROUTB STORM DMIN AND STRBRT ARCONSTRUCfION PRWRCf D20. Approval of agrasment (CO 90-005) between the City o! Rancho Cucamonga and Scott CeDle Coamunications, Incorporated, for addit tonal construction Permlt Pznvf stone. D21. Approval of Xap, execution of Improvement Agreamsnt, Improvement Security and Ordrrlnq the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and street Llghtinq Maintenance DLtrict Hoe. 1 and 2 Eor Tract 13621, located on the norehust corner of Hillside Bud and Hermosa Avenue submitted by Sahame Dwelopsent Company. City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Ynge b RESOLUTION NO. 90-U~b A AS,44LUTION D! T?f! CITY COVNCIL 08 TAR CITY OR IUIRCRO CUCAMONGA, CALI POANIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGR86NENT, IMPAOVEIffiNT SBCORITY, AND rINAL NAP O! TRACT NO. 13621 RESOLUTION NO. 90-006 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TN6 ANNEXATION OP CEATASN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGRTIN6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 rOA TIU\DT 13621 022. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Mnexat ion to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 end 2 for T::act 13851, locate6 north of Nilson Avenue, wart of DNr Creak Channel submitted Dy Pscific International Development, Incorporated. IESOLUTION NO. 90-007 A RESOLUTION Ol TNS CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY O! R11RCN0 COC71M0116A, CALIroRNIA, APPROVING I/4'ROVEMBNT AGREBIRNT, IMPROVtl~NT atCORITY, ANO rINAt MAP Or TRACT No. 13861 RESOLUTION NO. 90-008 ........-..-- .. ... ..... ..... ............. ... ...~ ..... ... ..,...w... CUCAMONGA, CALIFOIU7IA, ORDERING TRB ANNEXATION O! CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 POR TRACT 13851 D23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security end ocdering the Annexation to Landscape Maintsnance District No. 3 and Street Lighting NalnGnanCa Distrlet Noa. 1 and 6 for CUP 87-29, located at tM southwee[ corner of Lomita Covrt and Archibald Avenue submitted by Neirick Propert Les. R690LUTION NO. 90-009 A RESOLUTION Or TIR CITY COUNCIL OP TfR CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOAr CALIFORNIA• APPROVINO IMPROVEMENT AOAEEIQNT AND INPPOVEMIITl 9LCUP.ITY MA CONDITIONAL DSB PERMIT NO. a7-29 Ri80LOTIOp NO. 90-010 A RESOLUTION Or THN CITY COUNCIL Or Tot CIT'[ Or RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIM6 THE ANNEXATION Or CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LAlIDBCAPL MAINTENANCt DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ETRtET LIONTIMO MAINTtAANR DISTRICT 1108. 1 AND 6 lOR COP 87-29 City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Pages 7 D24. Approval to execuU ImproYement A9zeement, Impiovament Security and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Ho. 3 and Street Liahtina Mn inGnanee Dtet ri at xc., S Rnd e f .r OP SN-~? 1nr..eA .... t~.. z..rt ~. aide of Trademark Parkway, east of Pavan Avenue submitted by Reiter Rinker Gateway. RESOLUTION NO. 90-011 .. ovaOA"!'ION OF T°: _-.- ~C„C-_ _- T°s ..I TY _^P ._«_.._ CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA,n APPROVING IMPROVSMEAT AGAEBMBNT eAND IMPROVEMENT SBCUAITY POR OHVEI.OPMBNT AEVIBN NO. BS-13 RESOLUTION NO. 90-012 A RESOLUTION OF TIDE CITY COUNCIL O! TN6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TiBi ANNEYATION Ol CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STA86T LIGHTING NAINIRNANC6 DISTRICT NOS. 1 AMD 6 lOR DR 35-13 D25. Approval to execute TmprovsmsnL Agrasmsnt 6xtanslon for Tract 13441 located on the northeast corner of Victoria Park Lena and xenyon May auMaitte0 by Grupe Development. AESOLOTION NO. 90-013 A RESOLUTION Ol THE CITY COUNCIL O! TN6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, C1ILIFOPIIIA, aPYROVINO IMPROVEMENT ACA6EIO;lPf D26. Approval to accept Improvements, Raleass of Gonda and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 0617 located on the northeast corner on Nighlend Avenue end Milliken Avenue. Aeleaees laithful ParforaMnce Bond (Stt sat) $253,000.00 Accepts Maintenance Cuerantw Bond (Sirset) S 28,500.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-DIE A ABSOLUTION O- THE CITY COUNCIL OF TR6 CITY OF RAHCBO CUCAM0.90A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLTC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL NAP 8617 AND AUTHORIEING T@ FILING Oi A NOTICE OF CONPLBTION FOR TNR MOAK D27. Approval to accept Improvements, re1.GAN of NainGnsnw 6uarantN Bond for Tract 12233 located on the northwest corner of Church StrNi end Hellman Awnue. Mainbnanes 6usrantN Band (Street) $ 46,540.00 Ciiy Council Ninutss January 3, 1990 Page e 028. Approval to accept Improvamsnta, release of Maintenance Guatnnie9 Bond for Tract 12835 locetatl on the east Bide of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Nighway. Maintenance Guarantee Bona (StreeCJ $ 3,300.00 NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded Dy Brown to approve the Coreent Calendsr ae corrected. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. R R R f• R E1. APPROVAL OP TPESPAS$ING OAD ZNANCB AECOMNENDPD TO THE CITY COUNCIL 3Y THB PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION - Ord inanca prohibiting treepaaaing on private property. ORDINANCE NO. 408 (second reeding) AN ORDINANCE O! TNB CITY COONCIL OP TR6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.18 OF TITLE 9 OF TNB RANCHO COCAMONGA NONICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEii SECTION 9.18.012 ENTITLED "TAESPA88E8 UPON PRIVATE PROPBATY PROHIBITED" Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, afld LM title of Ordinanw No. 608. MOTION: Moved by Brown, ascondW Dy Alexander t0 waive Eull reeding and approve _-__ -..-- ..~. .-... ..,................ msuuwuaiYr -v. f • R R f F1. PUBI IC N6ha1NG TO PCEIV6 IN ING THE PAOPO BD IN- NTIDA 6%CAVATE THE ABTA L^_!Li BASIN NO. 1 NORTR OP w}_wY2a a+roxET BETk"iBN RCHI a2. AVENDE AND IUtt1MOSA AVENGE NITHIN Aa axaawx." AUTHOAI EATION POA EEECOTION O! CONTR CT POR SAID PR0. CT~ETAlP"REQUEfTE STEM to CONTZNUED TO JAMUM! 17, 3990 Mayor Stout atata0 this has bNn requested to bs continued to the Jsnuary 17, 1990 meeting. MOTION: Moved by 9cq~_at, aarords3 'si 8r :rn to wntinue the LEamt Ev Jsnvary i7, 1990. Motion carried unaniaously, 5-0. f • R f R F2• report presented Dy Dan Colson, PrLncleal Planner. CLty Council Hinutee January 3, 1990 Pays 9 Mayor Stout opened the meeting for publle hearing. These being no response, the public hearing wee eloeed. RaaOLU1'l0fl h,i. i0-O15 A RESOLUTION O/ TER CITY COUNCIL OP TER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PILN PERMIT REGULATIONS nRDINANC6 NO. 410 ifiret reading) AN ORDINANCS O! TER CITY COUNCIL OP TRS CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPOANIA, ADDING A NEN CNAPTSR 5.16 TO THE RM1CH0 CUCAHONGA 11UNICIPAL CODE PSRTAINING TO TNS PILNING PSRHIT PROCRSS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Nright to approve Resolution No. 90-015. Motion cart red unanimously, 5-6. Debra J. Aflame, Ciiy Clerk, reed the title of Ordinance No. 410. MOTioN: Moved by august, seconded by Alexander t0 waive full rending and set second reading of O[dinence No. 610 !or January 17, 1990 meeting. Hot ion cnrried unanimously, 5-0. • . . • • : F3. EN9IRDNMENTAL A88E86RNNT AND GENERAL PIJ111 AMENDNSNT 89-03A - - A Clty <..,~,. ..w ....~,...~,.... _ _.._______ _ ________ __ .e _ _.._ _.__-_.q _-- .. -. -..- ......-.... .,....... ..ye General PLn~to delete the policy `which limits tea number of very low end~low income subsidized housing units within any single development project. Stntf report presented by Alan Herren, AeeOCiaie Planner. Hayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Thera being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilwasan Nright asked it this was handled through a court of law. James Markman, City Attorney, stated this Ls being done as a result of the lawsuit regarding the Neetern Center of Lew 6 Poverty. RSSOLUTION N0. 90-016 A Id29OLUT1ON OP THE CITY COVHCIL OF TfSE CITf CF RA.gCY.O CUCAHONGA, CALIPOANSA, APPROVING GBNBIUL ALAlI AHENOMENT 89- 03Ar AMENDING TIR GENERAL PLAN HOUSING LLElRNT BY DELETING THB POLICY NHICR LIMITe TIR NUMBER O! VERY LOiI AND LON INCORR 90BSIDIEED HOUSING UNITS NITHIN IINY BINGL6 PROJECT, AND MAEZN6 PINDSNG9 IN SUPPORT TeZAEO1 NDTIONt Roved by Alexander, seconded by Etout to approve Resolution No. 90-016. Motion carried unanimously, S-0. city couneil Minutes January 3, 1990 Page 30 • • • x F4. H CHAY.TEB-39.36 AND ADDING A NEN SECTION 17.02.135. PERTAINING TO XEAISGPE REOUI REMENTS SLatf report presented by Den colaman, Principal Planner. Mayor Stout aiatod ha understood the purpose of Lhis ordinance was to primarily focus on drought tolerant type materials, but asked ll any coneideraYion was given to the plant materials which are necessary for removing poisons in the al r. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, explained how the Ordinance provides for guidelines for selecting trees ee it relates to Mayor Stout's concerns. Mayor Stout suggested to staff that tAe l1eL, ae it is developed, be sensitive to the type of plant materiels that have environmental benelSi• ae well ae saving wetsr. Councilman Buquet concurrsd. George Blanchard, Cucaaonga County Hater Dlatrlol, stated he cammsndad Lhe City staff who have worked on LDis and mated that the Cucamonga County Water O istr iei tally wpports ihL. Mayor stout opened the meeting for public Deering. Thera Dsinq no response, the public hearing wa clowd. asauwanun nu. yu-uIi A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL Ot THE CITY OP R71NCH0 CUCAHONGA, CALIFOANIA, 89TAELISHIN6 A XERI SCAPB A99BS91ffiNT SYSTEM POR RE9IEN OF LADIDSCAPe AND IRRIGATION PLANS OADINANC6 NO. 431 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CZTY COUNCIL O! TH6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORIPZA, ADDING A NEN CHAPTER 19.16, AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 17.02.135, TO TNB RAN1.7W CUCAMONCA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO 68TABLIHHING XHRISCAP6 R60UTAENENT3 MOTION: Moved by Nrlght, seconded by Exam to approve Aesolut ion No. 90-017. Motion carrlsA unanimously, 5-0. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 431. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Nrlght to waive Lull reading o[ ordinance No. 413 and set Ncon4 reading for January 17, 3990. Motion carried unsnlmosa3y, 5-0. • 1 • R R '~. city Council Ninutee January 3, 1990 Page 11 F5. OP HAVES AVENUB AND FOOTHILL BDOLSVARD SUHMITTBD SY LEWIS HONES OP CALIFORNIA Staff report preeentsd by Joe Stofe, Associate Civil Snginaer. Mayer stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION fi0. 90-018 _. .~__-J'T_ON CP m Ci:I CG6NCZL OF .i.~ CiiY ...+.. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ANBNDING PARCEL NAP 11030 , MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded 6y Brown to approve Resolution No. 90-018. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • + P6. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF DPDATED VERSIONS OP UNIFORM CODSS POR INCLUSION IN TIC MUNICIPAL CODE BUILD IN6 REGULATIONS Staff report presented by Jerzy Grnnt, Buildlnq Official. councilman Alexander expressed hie eoncern for the Flrs District and Buildlnq and Safety Department working together on code changes. Mayor Stout opened the meeting !or public besting. There Delnq no response, the public hearing wu eloaed. uwraMUa nu. rig (urar reacing) AN ORDINANCB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONOA, CAL IPORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.0 R, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.23, 15.32, 15.36, i5.d0, AND 15.44 OP TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OP THH RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AHD ADOPTING BY REPERENC6 THE "UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE", 1938 6DITION7 THi ONIFOAN BUILDING CODB, 1933 HDITION 2NCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO= THS "UNIFORM BVILOIN6 CODE STANDARDS", 1933 EDITION) THB "UNIFORM IIICNANICAL CODE", 3983 RDITIDN, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO) TH6 "ONI PORN PLUMBING ODDS", 1938 EDITION INCLUDING ALL 71PPENOICEB) THE "ONIFOAM CODE FOR TH6 AEA'1'EMENT OP DANGEROOS BUILDINGS", 1983 EDITION/ TfQ "UNIFOR!( MOUSING CODE", 1933 EDITION) TH6 "UNIFORM BUILDING 86CURITY CODE", 1983 EDITZGR) ANv :fie 'GNZPORM SIGN CODS°, 19dd EDIT1UNj WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO 9AID COD88, INCLUDING PBNALTI89 Debra J. Adams, CiEy Clerk, rud tAe titU of Ordinance No. 432. MOTIONt Moved by Buquat, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading o! Ordinance No. 432 and set eeoond reading [or January 17, 1990. NoElon married Urani.aoell, 5-O. city council Minutes January 3, 3990 Page 12 • • • • • . 6. PQELZC BEI1NINne G1. n v _ __ _ _ ___ ry. ~ry~nl ..a ~i,v ing Cammieeion'• decision to deny without prejudice • request fora carport nddifion to ar. existing automativa repair at 8517 North Grove Avenve. APN 207-220-05. (Continued fray Dsrober 6, 19i9j Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Hayor Stout asked what the City's legsl options ware. James Markman, City Attorney, stated in order to giant Chs variance, the Council hne io make a finding that there is a special cirewoetence In reference to this structure that makes it different Tram other property in tae zone. He etatetl tact after talking with staff and reading tea reports, hs is not aware of any facts that would formulaic the basis for finding a variance oal±d and approving this, Dui ae further sddad that dws not mean the applicant can't try to convince tae Council of tats. Hayor Stout asked for further clarification from stalf on the Planning Coasaieeionro intent on tail sad asked if therm was • varienec apPliad for. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hssrinq. Addressing the City council was: Hr. Noward Ociwtt, owner of Lae NSN Caragc, stated that In order for ~{..,w w uuiid one cerporc tney wou is new naa to make a lot of costly improveauntc, so he appealed to the Planning Commiuion. Be stated hie partner had built the carport without his knowledge and without a building permit. Mayor Stout askW it there were two issues to consider ionight; 1) if the improvements to the property arc Lriggcrad by any type of development, and 2; if this part lcular structure itwlt is within code. Brad Bu Llsr, Clty Planner, stated those are ins two Lsuas. Hnyor Stout asked if on the second Lssue, can the carport ba modLfiad in order to bring Lt in compliance with CM estback. Brad aullar, City planner, stated it vmuld Aeve to W moved. Hayor Stout aakcd if there wee any discretion on tM triggering point a to when thus additional improvements have to W made. Brad Bullerr City Plannst, stated if a building perm t 1• required, that orainanw SS would require substantial public improvements, and that there i• no relaxation to the provisions of thou conditions. city Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Pegs 33 Mr. Geivett eiatad ha cannot do anything with this other than •ehat hee been done. Me would like to have time to make the improvement e, because he could not make the ell at ones. 7--_-_ ___ ~ ._ ____..o. ...y.,.ue, the public hearing was closed. Councilman euquet etetad ha felt what was being asked of Mr. Geivett wee diaproport ionata with what he la doing to improve hie property. He felt the Redevelopment Agency should W Lnvolved with same of these improvements. He added he did not feel thu au en enhancement to the property, ana felt what was being asked of Mr. Geivett was not fair. Mayor Stout asked what the coat of thin wee. Mr. Geivett stated 56,000.00. Councilman Aleaander stated he diO nOL feel Mr. Geivett was Crying to sneak something by, but that a building permit should W issued. Me stated he agreed with what Councilmen SuqueL stated. Councilwoman Brown brought up iSa face !hat lhie carport was net going io snhence Mr. Geivett•e busineo, but fe1L Lhie was an unusual clrcumsisnca. sae stated eha agreed with Mr. WiveLt es fu a the cost of tM improvements. Councilwoman aright felt ordinance 50 should M looked at. She felt Mr. Geivett should comply with any etendude that wsryone sue camplias with. she stated eha felt he wu Ln violation of City standuds. Mayor stout stated he agreed wits the City Council on their concerns comparing the 54,000.00 to build iM carport as opposed to the coat of the impravemente. Me Ealt Lhie was a conscious decision for Mr. Geivett to do this, end did not have any sympathy for him. Ha felt the City Council should uphold Lhe Planning Coamiaeion's decision. Mayor scout asked eteff if Gho carport could be moved to another location on the property. Brad Buller, Clty Planner, pointed out on the map where it could possibly be moved to. Councilman Buquet stated M did agree that this could possibly ba moved to tM south side of the property, end agreed with Mayor stout that Lhie was two separate caves. Cauncilzaa Alexander asked how long ago eau was done. Brad Buller, City PLmer, stated it wee two yeas ego that the Clty found this illegal structure. Oan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated it took one year just to get Nr. Osivatt to till out the application for LM carport. ti >. x. City Counoll Ninutee Jwuezy 3, 1990 Page 16 RESOLUTION NO. 89-596 A RESOLOTIOp OP THE CITY COUNCIL 02 "RE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALSTORNIA, UPHOLDING TIDE PS.ANNINg COl9lr pa inrs•c uacasroq 20 DENY WITHOUT PAEJODSCB MINOR DEV62APNEDT ASVIEW NO. 89-22, LOCATED ON TH6 80DTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND GROVE AVENUE IN TeE GHNEAAL COMNEACIAL DISTA2CT AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT TID2REOP .... :Jii: riuved 6y Alexander, wCOnded by storm to approve Reeolut ion No. 89-596. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. . ~ G2. NODIPICATION TO OEVELOPNEOT FLNIHW 88-32 - N6 - Appeal of a planning CommiesLOn Mcision to deny a request to modify • Condit ion of approval requiring wrety for tM removal of the existing Mtention basin and construction of a storm drain fwillty for a development on 1.55 scree in the General Industrial District (Subarea 26) of the Industrial Spaelflc Plan, located at tAe southern terminus of Byswp Drive, north of 4th Street, - APN 229-331-02. Staff report presented by Betty Niller, Associate Civil BnginNr. James Nsr1®an, elty Attorney, stated LhaC it Se legal staff's opinion that you cannot attempt to lery part of Lhis on tM other property oanere. He stated wMn thin Landscape Naintsnance District was tosmsd there was never any intention of removing this, it wne intended to melnialn ii. Ne stated LE this condition Ls removed, w one would M responslbie for Lt. Mnyor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Clty Council woes John Neleon, appellant, presented information why he was not in fever of the planning Co®ieelon•• deeielon. Nayos Stout stated tM Clty Council hea bean legally advised not to Brent the appeal. He suggested Mr. Neleon might want to litigate thi• wlih the otAsr properly owners for the coat. Councilman Buquet uksd Nr. NrLon if he was aware of the reUntion basin when M bought tM property. Mr. Neleon ststsd yse. Thera Ming no further soponw, [he publio Mating wu closed. City Counell Mtnutee January 3, 1990 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 90-019 A RESOLV'!'IOU ^. T:~ CITY . - r GF TRS CI TI GF N.LYC:O CVCAMONGA, CaLIFOAHIA, OBNYINGa AN APPEAL OP A PLANNING COMNISSION DECISION TO OBNY A RHQVHST TO nODIPY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR OEVHfgPMBNT REVIHN 88-32 RSOUTAIN6 SURETY FOR TR8 REMOVAL 0! THH HYISTING DHTHNTION DAS IN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A STORN DAAIfl ?AGILITY POR AN INDUSTRIAL DSVBLOPMHNT ON a..... rr°~.°. OF W~w{1 TMATtD LT m_u` ________. mvvylMlQ Q9 }P/RSOP DRIVE AND NOATN OF 4T6 STREET MOTION: Moved Dy euquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 90- 019 and uphold the Planning Commlaainn'a 7ecieion. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. R f f f• f Mayor Stout enlled n receae nt 5:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:08 p.m. with ell members of Council present. • . • f • s G3. CONSIDHRATION OF ADOPTION Or ATTACHED R680LUTION WHICH HSTAHLI wg RATES FOR POLL-TIME INHPHCTION RBODIRHO ONDHA TBH RANCf10 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODH POA REPEATEO,RHINSPHCTIONS Steff report prasantod Dy Jack Lem, city Manager. Mayor scout opmneo lra rt'.aeeing for public hearing. There 6einq no reeponeer the public hearing waa cloamd. A850LUTION NO. 90-020 A ABSOLUTION OP Tl01 CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, BSTABLISHIN6 HOURLY RATES FOR FULL TIMH INSPHCfION PROVIDED UNDER RANCHO CUCAMONCA MOt{ICIPAL COvii FOw RHP671TE0 REINSFBCTIONS MOTION: Moved by Hrown, uconded by Alexander to npprove Resolution No. 90-020. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. f f w • • w G3. GDNSiDSRATLON OF ADJUSTmdmT Ot eDILOING A.e0 3AaHTY DIVISION PHAuIT AND PLAN CED:CY PEES - A raaolution amending fans for variou^ parmiL end plan checking earvicam provided by the Building asu eaf.ty Divi.iw:. Staf[ report preaentad by Jack Lam, City Nsnngar. Jerry Grant, Building Official, added thae thin Asa barn lorwardad to the EIA also. James Markman, City Attormy, nGtad tha>aa lane will not b• creating any ravanuaa. City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Page 16 Mayot Stout opened the mwtinq for public hearing. Thera being no reeponeer the public hearing wan cloned. A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AIOZNDING ABSOLOTION 79.1, SHCTZON 1.0, AMENOZNG FEES FOA PHANZZ6 ANJ SERVICES PAOY'IOED RY TEE BUILDING AND SAPSTY DIVISION NOTION: Moved by Alexander, eecondnd by Buqust to approve Resolution No. 79- 16. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. t • f C5. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON PAIRHONT NAY VINTA E DRIVE BEVENTN STREET. AND VICTORIA PARE LANE Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Traffic 6ngLneer. Mayor Stout opened ihs meeting fot public hearing. Thera being no response, the public hearing was cloned. ORDINANCE NO. 413 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OT THE CITY COUNCIL OP TBE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OB THE RANClIO CUCAMONOA CITY CODE, REGRADING PRIMA FACIE SPHHO LIMITS uWn CaNTAlp CITY aTREET$ Debra J. Adams, Clty Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 413. NOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Btown to waive full reeding of Ordinance No. 413 and net second readiny for January 17, 1990. Notion carried uP,af,...au-h, -... • • • • ~ G6. CONSIDERATION OP e1CATEBOlL9 ORDINA. C6 ILCOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL NY TNR P B~In a~FeTV COlMZ ale. - Ordinance restricting the use of ekateboarde Ln the public right-of-way. Staff report presented Dy Duane Baker, Sr. Admin Latrative Assistant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for pubiie hearing. Addrsuin9 the City Council wau Mark Nhitehsad, 7050 Novara, stated he le concerned with the safety upect, but wu ^lw concerned with children having the opportunity to ride • skateboard i[ they so deaize to. Ns did not feel it wu skateboarding that wu dangerous, but how the parses riding tM skateboard handled it that could crab a dangerous situation. cLty Council Minutes January 3, 3990 Page 17 There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Huqust asked hw this would eflect Clty parka. Duane Baker, Sr. Administrative Assistant, stated that unless it was posted now, it would not affect them. Counciiman Buquet stated hs is It skataboardsrs should be ell owed to [ids in an area ouch ae a basketball courts however, he did not feel they shoo Ld be able to race an a crosawaih, that they ehouid walk across the street. He felt this should be removed from the Otdinmce. Councilwoman Brown asked why this was being coneldered. Duane Bakei, 9r. Adminiat rat Lva Assistant, atnted it was Wcauae of a recent fatal accident. Mayor Stout added he was tM person who Rad requested this because of iha danger involved. Ha felt children mould Da allowed to rids skateboards, but that the City should sat quldslinee to help Duke it as sate as pooibla. Councilwoman Wright felt safety for eksteboard riding should W implemented by the Sheriff •• Departant as L done with teaching bicyela safety. Mayor Stout stated ha felt this should also qa Sn the Grapevine. councilwoman Brown asked if someone is riding their sksteboard in the middle of the street, can a Sheriff atop a child and advise them to gat on the sidewalk. Jamee Markman, City Attorney, stated yes, n Sheriff could advise a child to get on the sidewalk. ORDINAHCB NO. 414 (first Yeadinq) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COVNCIL OP THB CITY OP PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.63 TO THE RANCHO .7JC11}IONCA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAIHING TO THE OSE OP ROLLER SEATES Any MINICAR OFFICES IN CERTAIN AREAS Debra J. Adams, City Clark, reed the !tile o! Ordinance 411. MOTIONi Moved by Alszander, ucondsd by Buga.k tc waive full reeding end vet second reeding of Ordinance 411 foc January 17, 1990 witA the deletion of allowing skaNboard riding in crosswalks. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Counellwaman Brown skated she wu reluctant in vot inq yam beesuu sne did not feel it wu up to City government to teach kids ulety, but that it wu up to the parenN. • ~ • • • ~ City Council Hinutes January 3, 1990 Pnge 1B G7. EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOUIRS PDBLI^ RIGHT-OP-NAY POA TN@ 19TH STevaT WIDENING PROJECT BBTNEBN eCEI ar AVENOS ND H}ygN AVB - Publle Hearing of protests regarding 8minent Domain acilon to acquire public right-of-way for the 19th Street NSdaninq ProiacL between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue at the rror. Li -... ' .;-_ __-_..~_ ... c...,- i:.. :0- _`_ '~i. ___^_a wt., , ne ,avu 2D2-201-60),a and ~a ascent lok' on G19thn Street' (APN '202-201-72)` for the construction of street islprovamsnts across the lrontags of said property. Staff report preeentW by Nib Olivier, Sr. Cioil Engineer. James Harkman, City Attorney, stated there has been contact with the property owner's attorney and Engineering staff stating that ehey have taken exception with some of the 1931 Act processes and procedures and felt they cannot 6e assessed under the 3911 Act for Lhe improvsawnte. Ne zurthar added this is one of the reasons why the property owners will not agree. He felt agzaeamnt would be reachedl however, it was Mfore tM Council tonight because agreement has not been reached ao far end it is io determine whether the rights-of-way are necessary for the pro~aM. Councilman Buquet asked where we were now. JemeO Markman, City Attorney, sisiad we aie coniinulnq negotiations, but that we are et the point of condemnation at present. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public Lnput. Addressing the City Council w@Ye: Mr. Suruki, 10223 19th street, stated M wants tM street to M widtned, nne _ _ ..-......-~.. An• earl AI• nnnn~~na aMaF •Fa nnArn~wl n__n_ ._._i AI _- __ ___ ei aisd ha did not fwl M ehculd be charged tar the improvements. Hr. Suruki'• eon, expressed hie concerns about hie parents losing some vt their property. Councilman Buquet pointed out they ere only talking shout loeirq port of the right-of-way. Rus^ Nnguire, city Engineer, stated wMther thoe Laprovemsnte go 1n or not, if the Suruki'• wanted to eubdloidc their property, they would lone part of the acre Mcauu they mould hew to AedicsU ptrt o[ it. Mayor Stout asked where tMir attorney was tonight, Nx. Surulii atataa he could not be here tonight. Nr. SurukL • son felt this condeanation was a scare tactic. James Marlonan, City ACtornay, stated this Ls not a suers tactic, and that no one is trying to Lntlmldab anyone. He added they will continua to negotiate with tM property ownsn, but added they Mw bean offered • fair deal. City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Page 19 Councllwwaen Nright stated Mr. Suruki should have known thet he would have to put in the infrastructure when he bought the property. she didn't want people to think the City was tM "Ded quy^ in this condemnation. There bn±ng n~ {•_-l~e_ _c_~ .ca, .,a p~Llic nearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 90-021 A ABSOLUTION OP TNB' CITY COCNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RSNCHU CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TF16 PCBLIC NEED AND NSCESSITY TO CONCEMN A PORTION 08 CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ASS&SSOA'S PARCEL N0. 202-201-US, POA TNB NIDENING, REALIGNMENT, CONSTAVCTION AND INPAOVENENT OP 19TH STREET (STAYS AOVTE 30) BBTWBEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 90-022 A A690LUTION OP T86 CITY COUNCIL OB THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THB PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OP CERTAIN PEAT. PROPERTY LOCATBD IN TiB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAN0116A, CALIFOW7IA, A99ESSOR9 PARCEL NO. 202-201-{0, FOR THE NIDENINO, AEALION16NTr CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF 19TH 9TP86T (STATt AOOTE 30) BETNEEN ARCNIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENGE, AND MAKING -INDINGS IN SUPPORT ^,etaAEOr RE$DLDTIDN NO. 90-023 A ASSOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCANONGA, CALIPORNIAr DSCLARING TNB PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDElD7 A PORTION OF CERTAIN ABAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, AHSESSOR•S PARCEL NU. 202-201-72, FOR THE NIDENING, AE7ILIGNMBNT, CONSTRUCTION AND IMPAOVEMBNT OF 19Th STIIEET (BTATB ROUTS 36) BETNEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MMINO PINOING9 IN SUPPORT T103RE08 NOTION: Moved Dy Buqust, sacondsd by Alexander to npprove Resolution Nos. 90- 021, 90-022 and 90-023. Notion cerriad unanimously, 5-0. A F • A i 68 - Publie Neaxinq regarding minent Domain action to acquire public right-of-way for the Cucamonga Storm Drain, Phase 1, locatW at 7797 Vineyard Avenue (APN 208-091-24) !os the conaeruction of storm drain improvsmsnts aerou said yroparty. Staff report presented by Mike Olivier, 9r. Civil Engineer. City Council Ninutsa January 3, 1990 Page ZO Hayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no rv eponse, the public hearing wee closed. A PBSOLGTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL O? THE CITY OF AANCHO :'OCAMONCA, TALI POAHIA, OSCLARING 'IBS PUNLIC NEED AND NBCBSSITY TO CONDEMN A p(YRTION O1 C"nATAIN RRAL PRGP3TiTY LOrATED IH THE CIT_' OF R1fNC1i0 CCCAMONGa, CAi.IPOANIA, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 2n9-091-24, POR TH6 ALICNIBliT, CONSTRUCTION AtiD INPROySI~NT ~)d 1'F~ CUCAMONOA 9TOAM DAAIM (PRASE 1), AND HARING FIKOINGS 1 iUPPORT THEABOP HOTION: Noved by Brawn, wconded by alernnder to approve Resolution No. 90-026. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. ~ . • • . . Hl. REOUBST BY zTA Zr±)La T,I .E -El-UE TO AOD a88 TBB ITY COlni _Tr. vvnaRn lN.: USS OP RED N: LL PARE POR TBE 1990 SEASON Robert Naque, 6166 Cabrillo Court, repreaentstiva of alts Loma Littia League, seked if there was s way to daisy the refurbishing of Har it age Perk '.`ntil July, 1990 instead of starting in aprll, so Che Little League could play their gemaa at Heritage, the Softball association could 'uee the s,.)a.. e..a_ e,. _ _ which era to bs completed `in September,~1990.V• ~Vy y ~~~ ~••- ~.~ ~••-,,• Auee Maguire, City Bnglnaaz, geplained why they need to do thin in April lnataad of waiting until July stating that it in because of the yraee getting esta6liehed before the intense heat of aua)mer. Councilman BuqueL stated hie concern was that the fields ere not used for nine months and that the thrw months they are uwd tMy have to W zanoysted at ihet time. Nr. Hogue stateA ha did not ass a problem with the baseball fLlde, but ha did see • problem with tM soccer fields. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that Rues riaguire, City 6nglnsar, had mentioned ae en alternative that SMEeunity services and Engineering ocald p:xt tai: i:oada together to develop a compromise to euiat all eporU groups. Councilwoman Crown stated she felt something could W worked out to uu other psrb in the City, i.e., Victoria and Terra y1sU to aceaamodate everyone. Jack Lam, City Nenagsr, added that Ju Behults'e, Cpmunity esrvlwe Msnagsr, pLn accaemodatee the Little Leaquq and the adult Bottball can aLO be accommodated without displacing tM Uam. CLCy Council Minuiee Jnnunry 3, 1990 Pages 21 Pere Williams, 5723 Nepe. stored he has twren involved Ln sports groups, antl expressed hie concerns about the way the fields axe being renovated. •rmny Hernandez, 10693 Monie Vista comae nded the City for the fields they are providing. He felt ewryons should consider the safety factor for the kids going to and from ttsir games. :.`s.e i:.;ing no further response, the public inrn.t ....,,,~ .,.. rip"..:, Councilman Buquet stated he ie frusiratad with the conflict In echedu ling. Re ewtea ne suggested at the Park G Aeczsation Commluion meeting that taste were options in getting the fields renovated. fle stated he felt something scold be done to aecnmmodste everyone. Councilman Alexander etnted he felt what Auea Mesquite, City Bngirear, was trying to do was probably going to ba the beat overall effort in the long run. Ha felt the council should go ahead and approve etaf f'a recommendation, even though it ie going to Lnconwnisnce people. He etaGed he is concerned with the safety of the children. Councilwoman Brown stated it the parks had bean built properly to begin with, the Council would not M having the discussion they era having now. She recognised tl.at it would W Oiftioult for patents to qst their kids to other practice fields bscauu some parents work, end that it L awze conoen lent to put them es Gloss [o Li~air rssidenw a possible. She applauded Ruse Naqu ire, City Bnginesr, for trying to do Lhis right, but she agreed with Councilmen Buquet as far as the time frame they are planning on doing the renovation. she felt ether ueane snourc ov iooaae at an orgex to provide s different ^window". Councilwoman Pright stated she agreed with what Rurs !lguire. City 8ngineaz, was recommenainq and that Lf ws didn't do what he war suggesting, that we might be jeopardising the Cicy's monsy~ bur on the other henO, she hated to nee the children without fields to play sports. she felt this ehoul~l nave been done right to begin with, end felt the City should adjust taair "window". Mayo.: stout suggestN this M continued to January 17, 1990 in urcer for the Council to hear from the AYSO. Hs aLo suggaeGd that the renovet Loa be delayed for a year until Beryl Park is completed, but was afraid tars would hurt the litigation. Ruse Megulrs, City 6nglnser, augqutad that if they do postpone the renovation that they dp li Lor a long period of time. councilwoman Brown stated Chat iE all sports groups ware to qst together for discuuion, she did not want to sw tM situation whsrs they arc all fighting !or Heritage and Red 8111 Parks. Councilwoman Nrighi a<atad sae would like to get • report from Russ Maguire, City 6nglnaaz, on adjusting tM "window^ and would like input Exam tiu sposG groups on hie suggestion. City Council Minutia January 3, 1990 Pages 22 Scott Vutphy, 8321 Vinayud j7, aakad that r.preeantat ivea from all sports groupa be informed on what La happening before it comes to the City vowncii. Councilwomen Brown auggeated that all the groupa and staff meet and that hopefully it could W worked out prior to the January 17 meeting eo that it would not have to coma on the agenda before the City Council. Councilman august etntad the aoccar fiwlde do nawd to De renovated, but the[ the little leagues and aoYU+x11 fU!.da do not need to be renovateA. Rr. Nilliame felt it .ou ld ba worked out with AYSO. [still Shaw stated -ha would likes aayor Stout and councilw,xnen grown present at the meeting with wwryona. JoC Schultz atatad he is mNtinq Mith AYBO Thursday night. ACTIONt Item to coma back January 9, 1990 with a report and rol "t ion. • • ~ • ~ . Mayor stout called a rscau at 11:15 p.m. Tha meat:ag reconvened at 31:34 p.m. with all mambas of Council l+reeent. • . • • . . RL. REPORT oa oP,3g, SPACE BTVDY OP n ATINO P Rx O crnwATIOBE-PRRjQR"TY RHC0IB~NDATIOBB POR pAAE AOODI9ITIOB (COaLLnuW from Octobwe 10, 1989) S'. aff report praaantad by Jw Schultz, Community Services Manager. Councilwoman Brown asked for clarification on the Landscape Matntgnance District (LMD) coat par unit. Joe Schultz, CoG:ounity Services Nanagar, ralaued to hie staff report for thn Lnformai ion, with Jerry PuiwoOd, Deputy City Manegar, giving Eurthar explanation on to ia. Councilwoman iiright wxpraaaad concarna regarding rweidanta :n 8wction B getting a perk, snC would it atfwet the total LMD 1 rwaidanb. Mayor Stout felt the ayatam nwadad to tr ELxlble to reflect apportunity sad abii ity. Councilwoman Brown felt o report needed to W worked up on aubaonaa. 9ha also twit in[oraution needed to G gathered on thw LND Ln tM Caryn tract ao a to not acara the people away. Chuck Bayu, Prwaidaot of t:a Caryn BaaaROwnar"^ Aaaociation, aaggwat ad that a couples mambwra c! thw Cf.ty Connell and Coamnlty 8arvicu loin th9r at tMlr mawtinq on Januu'y 13. Clay Counel2 Minutes January 3r 1990 Page 23 Hayor Stout and Councilwoman Brain volunteered to attend. .. __^~~ •_._.., _..- --..--..a a.praoaad ~.-r ... a..aa .oz eeaYU w get a paYN. ACTION: Purihez information to come bnc': regarding thin at the Pebruary 21, 1990 meeting. H3. RBPORT ON RISTOAY AND FBA3IBILITY OP DBVBL9PMAAT OF CwAPPBY GION P Staff report presented by Jw Schultz, Community Services Manager. Councilwoman Wright stated eh• llksd the idea of Joint Perks Agreements by the City and the County end would like mote information on this. Joe Schultz, Community 9ervi.es Menagar, stated he mould calk Lo the county about this. Councilwoman Brown stated sM has hesrd !rw Supervisor Nalker that the County was given lots of money to preserve open spew, end ssked that we contact Jon Nikels' office about thin. ACPIONE Report to come back. • ~ I1. CONSIDERATION OF can rvn1oN awwlN AIA T0. -IC TA SNIN I NTS OVER TAS CITY OF RANCAO CUCANONOA (COntiaved from Dee•ebee 6, 1939) BTATF REQV63T6 TBIS ITEN BE COIFfIMDED TO JANDAET 17, 1990. ACTION: item continued t0 Jenuery 17, 1990. • 1 f f • R I2. CONSIDRRATION OF REAPPOINTMENTS TO TA6 saerw C C N-A COMMLTMr FOVNDATION BOARD O! DIpECTOA3 NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded Dy Brown to approve the recommended r•appointmente of Barton, Mannerino G Ross. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. w • • • . ~ I3. CONSIDERATION O! 9p0i Na'e OF POS I e ••av COIO(ISBIONE - Connell Subcommittee recommsndat ion for public Safety Cammiulon Appointments. MOTION: Novell by Nsight, oconded by Brown to approve iM recammanded eppolntmenis of Amodt, alas and Curatalo. Notion serried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Hinutee January 3, 1990 Page 24 w • . x ~ . ~_ - City Manager, stated That at LF.e teat break ha waa moss aware of further "information to help clarify the sports groups problems. Ha stated that Alts Loma Little League waa always going to, and bee accepted going to, Aed Hill, regardlo• of what HoD Hogue pld. ey doing that Che City would tear up Heritage Park and the soccer folks would not be affected, which meant the Little Gaque Polka voultl a aceosaaodated et Red Hill. He stated the prcblem waa LLa adult softball people got disrupted. He said everything moss all right until the adult Softball folio acid there needW to be m alternative ao they wouldn't have to De fragmented. ea ststsd the Park 6 Recreation Commiwion told staff to f1nQ an alternative to fit them in. He stated the alternative they came up with moss instead of tearing up Heritage Park all at once, staff decided to break it up in half, tM Little Lague could still stay there end wouldn't be effected. TM adults would ba aehaduled all on those fields end wouldn •t be diarup[ed, but etnce the adulb can drive, they can drive up to Haritaga Park, and the sports groups could all M aceamodated. Re stated that wee abet the agreement wee. Hs stated the only iM rweon the LLttle Lague put tM 1Lem on tM agenda was Mcauas they feared tM adult team would ask to do aawthlnq that they wouldn't sent to do. Md since staff name up with thin alternetiw which they thought everyone agreed to, twryone still wasted tc come in caw one said eoerthinq different [rw shat they all egrted to. Ha etatW ae ha !s Gold Dy a couple of the sports psopU, Sa that they needed the proposal written up in such a way they could understand it. Ha stated they didn't understand Lt. Ha stated ha waa tole in tM hallway, that if tM soccer folks dLd not want to use Haritaga, than it aould open up another "window of opportunity^ that mLghL have bwn Defter. Re veld they would Mw agrwd to qo to Red Hill provided that 4An.. 4^A 4A. _ _ _ _ _ .__ _.._ _-~_ :-_ - - s ~i Li.iey u.me up. ne static that under the aiternttiw that staff had,•a1ta~Lama LSttU Lague mould not have Dwn disrupted, they bed already accepted going to Rad Hill thin year - thnt Le shat they pant earl ler in the meeting by Dro y.;n u.y tM agreement. They wanted to wke sure no one kicked them off of R"d Hill. He stated the soccer wee never going to M affected, one the only ones going eo W effected were the adults, which staff had caw up with a euggeation for the adults, but tMy would have to go Mtwwn Red Hill end the ooe field st Heritage. He stated if this could ba described properly, they would all W for it. Councilmen Buquet avid this Sa contrary to whet Mr. Hogue said tonight. Jack Lem, Clty :.a_iager, mated they aouid 9n together tomorrow, and tMy would work things ou! io audu everyone happy. Mayor Stout stated Chet staff ehauld get this in writing. Jack Lam, CLty Manager, stated he would do this. J1. Mcyclinq bloc a !t relates to AB X020 (Nright ). i. City Council Minutes January 3, 1990 Page 25 J2. Library leeua. J3- Ordinance SB - trismer mechanism far Pelruery 7. 1990 moot lnq. Jd. Hou CS*_y Se using recycled paper (Brown. J5. Discueaion of volunteee progzam for various City eervicee ae in Oakland and Palo Altq [oz lebruary ], 1990 meat ing. (Brwm) • ~ ~ • ~ NO communication was made from tM public. • • a t f f MOTIONi Moved by Alexander, eecondad by Baguet to adjourn the mwting to January 9, 1990 for a joint meeting witb the Historic Preservation Commieeion. Motion carried unanlalouely, 5-0. tfeeting adjourned at 1239 a.m. Beapectfully eubmlttad, Debra J. 1ldame City Clerk ApproveJ~ 3. :.~. ~'^.*~: . January 9, 1990 CITY OP RANCEIO COCAHOAGA CITY COONCIL HINOTES Joint Haetinc Joins Heating of the City Council end The Historic Preservation Commission A. CALL TO ORDER A joint meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Historic Preservation Coanission met on Tuesday, January 9, 1990, at the Lions Park Community Centez, 9161 Bese Line Rond, Aencho Cucamonga, Cel ifornie. Ths meeting was called to order et 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembero: Nilliem J. Alexander, Dehorsh H. Brown, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Meant was Councilmamber: Charles J. Buquet II. Also present ware: Jack Lam, City Managert Linda D. DmLrls, Deputy City ....y i :.gl: Hrad~HUller, City Plannerj•Larry'Henderson, Principal 'Planner;^JOC yschulta, Community services Hanagarj Rsthy Sorenson, Recreation Supsrintandant; Diana O'Neal, Administrative Malyst; Susan Hickey, Administrative Aide? JsfE Ring, Deputy City Attorney; and Jen Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. R R R R R R H1. APPROVAL OP BALL PIBLD ALLOCATION ALTERNATIVE ABLATZNO TO NERITA68 PARR RECONSTRUCTION. 9tnff zsport presented by Joe Schultz, Community .Services Manager. Councilwomen Wright asked Eor clnrifieetion on the lighting policy on Sunday r.! ghte. Jw Schultz, Community Services Hantger, stntsd that currently the lights are blacked out or. Sunday, and only on until 10:00 p.m. on the other nights. Councilwomen Ncight asked if sccordinq Co the staff report if all Hems x111 be ccnomagdated, was the lottsty just to detsrmins the Lima and place for gems:. Joe Schulte, Community Services Nanagar, stated that was rorract. City Council Minutes Jenuery 9, 1990 Page 2 Hayor stout opened the meeting for public input. A woman from the Alta Loma Llttie isague zelt they warn beiry .:i apiaced for their entire saaeon and they still wanted to ploy at Aeritage Park. Sha stated the alternative plan discueaed with staff was just that, an alternative plan, Dut stated that if they could not play at Heritage Park they would accept playing at Aed Hill Park. Councilwomen Brown asked if their position hoe not changed since the January 3, 1990 Council vwatinq. The woman stated no. Joe Schultz, Community Servicee Nanagez, stated that all parties might not be happy about the compraoiee, Dut that they know whet it will take io get the fields reconstructed. He presented 6nckground information on the decision to renovate Aeritage Perk and how It was determined which fields wind be renovated first. Ruse Anguire, City Snginear, stated one of the reasons they decided on the wet field first was that another field wet being added, so that next saaeon when the east field wee being renovated, there wind be tw fields cvailable to play on. A gentleman from the audience stated he felt the reason AY50 was accepting thin agreement was that they wrs making no changes in chair schedule or locations. A gentlemen from the audience stated there wrs only three fields in Rancho Cucamonga thst did not have soccer grade on Chem, eo he felt there wrs adequate facilities in the city for relocetinq soccer. A gentlemen from Adult Softball stated they dada •L like staff's proposal either, bui felt that if they didn't agree with the compromise, they wind have nothing. Councilmen Alexander ataisd ho felt staff has dons a tremendous amount of wrk and thst w would have s quicker renovation because of it. Ae was sorry that they couldn't satisfy everyone, but felt the long term benefits outwighed the short term inconvenience. Aayor Stout stated he agreed with Councilman Alexander felt it wind be batter for Lhs ohlidran In the Tony run. Hr knew tfiat Citrve little league wax displaced when Red Aill Perk was renovated, but they meda it through the year and they now have one o! the beet fields in the area. A rsprsuntative trom the Citrus Little League stated the! pwpls wze wry unhappy when Md Nill Park was being renovated, Dut they all felt the end results wze worth it. Aayor Btout closed the meeting for public input. CSty Council Minutes January 9, 1990 Page 3 Councilwoman Brown stated she wee hoping the compromise would be one that the people involved would be happy with. Shs felt it moos unfortunate that everyone __ _ _ _ 1_, f,.: feu: tel. n~ lAn.~ ....._ ~. ~..nnnnA ~ •MV A.ft felt^that if ityhad to ba corrected it `should M done the right way eo it wouldn't have to be done again. She agreed with etafE'e reconsaendation. Councilwoman Gright stated chat baaad on the infonmtion presented, it sppeare4 that the leant amount of disruption mould be to qo with staff's propoasd compromise. HOTION: roved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to adopt staff's recoaatendation and to amend the lighting policy. Hotion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Baguet absent). Councilwoman lfright asked Sf the neighborhood around Red Bill Park hoe been notified about the temporary chango in the light policy and Chat the lights will bs louvered. Joe schultt, Community 9ssvicsa Msnagsr, mated cM reaident• ern be notified and advised of tM data tail will bs sftective. Be further stated that ell the louvering should be completed in January or February, wall before play started in Mereh. R • • R } } Jack Lam, City Manager, requested Council recess to an 8xscutlvs Seeeion to Ala ae .vnA/n lavn,IR TM n~uHn oneuM .f a.M •n _wnn..f L.o Session. R The meeting reconvened nt Bt55'p. m. with four mmsbere of Council present (BUquet absent). R R R,} R R C. JOIMT ITHIIB O! OIHCOSSIOH C1. Present from the HSatorio Preeervstion Camieeion ware: Melicent Arner, Marsha Banks, Gana Billings, Stevan Prenion, end Chairman Hob ec)usidt. Abwnt were ^~wmaulonare: Ada Cooper and Alan Haakvita. . • . R R R C2. POSSIBILITY OP ACOOIRIMO LaxO !OR PLaCRweMT 9P HISTORIC HOM[S. Coamiaelonsr Hanks stated she felt thLs issue started with the Alusmnn Roue on yoothill Soul sward, that they had awsral parties interested in purchaalnq tM house but tMf had no wture in the City to mow the house to. BM felt that if land was not purchased now, it eitNr would not W nval3able in the luture City Council Rinutse January 9, 1990 Page 4 or it would not Da in an appropriate location. She stated that the Redevelopment Agency has wirhin their budget $50,000.00 per year to acquire land, Dut it has •- F.a ~Ith!n a Bwdwvelevment eroiect area. Sven though this wne not enough to buy a lot, oho felt it was a place to alert in formalizing a plan of action. Mayor Stout asked if they proposed that these hamae be renovated Eoz personal residential use. Commieeioaer Banks stated their first idea was tc uea this lend ss s rlrge of land bank eo Lhie acreage would be available, and ae m Individual mows interested in moving a house and starting mnovatione for their own home, they would buy the land and the Agency would be able to use the money to purchase additional land. tiayoc stout stated that the City wne a large sum of money for affordable housing, that 20a of aha Redevelopment budget has to ba aced for that. ee felt that if this type of a protect rrould qualify, a poeeiDility to explore would be to sae if they could use same of that money to buy an area and set up a neighborhood where the historic homes could be moved to, than Ball them at nn affordable price. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Nanager, stated aha only reetrictiona would be that the awls oz rent of the property would have to W at an affordable rata, and the City might want io make aura tact tM coat benefits of aha money invested wan ,.emmanaurats with aha amount received ror Chs sale o! the property. E16{or Stout asked for clarification on wow thews funds were auppoeed to De used. Idnde oaniale, Deputy City Manager, stated aha idea was io write it down to .~ithez rant ar sell at an affordable. Bhe felt what tea Agency needed to ~oneidar mows getting sae moat for their dollar, that they didn't want to have ,oo mace of a discrepancy between aha value of the some and wawa they would be able to offer !t at, but they era still in aha davelapment stage of the proyrem. Commiaeioner Banks asked if a contract could M entered into whereby tae honew~rner would restore aha home because aha homes era elwaya free, but aha Fedavelopment Agency mould bs providing for the lend end aha moving of the nouee. t.indn Uan:els, Deputy City Manger, stated there are several th:'~.nga tho Agency could do. Councihann Alexander wanted an optio.~ to nxplo:•e would be to have n htytoric hou:~F In a park wetting, ar.3 ha~a It available for ~accunlty aaa. Linda Daniels, Dsputy City Banagar, stated that would be a good uu in s neighborhood park aettin~ Ca®iaaioner Backe felt the idea of buying a clock of land needed to be developed, ao that tM homes would W gzoui,ed together and not be disruptive to peoy_e that have new homes in thuz neighborhood. City Council Minutes Jsnuary 9, 1990 Page 5 Councilwoman Brwm felt iha Victoria Lakes area would be a beautiful setting for hiecoric homes. Linda Daniels, Deputy 4ity Manager, stated yw could use money outside of the redevelopwnt project area if you sera using sfEOrdable Rousing funds, but that there are restrictions end you would have to weigh the benefits of doing ihat. The $50,000.00 dome not have to be used for affordable horsing ae long ae It was In the Aedevelopmsni pmjact arse. Councilwoman Wright felt Lf affordable housing money wee v - -- tY.e pu:rbaac of land, it redly wMn't DenefiLting people who needed aflordable housing, because the people who were able to afford restoring the homee aren't going to be people who ware et affordable housing Yncama levels. Co®leeionar eanke agreed the[ it vrould probably be very Eew people who mould JpJalify for the affordable horsing guidelines that world alw bs able Co restore the homes, but occaaionelly there are craftsmen who are interested in restoring a home tact would quality. Commieeioner Presean stated there is going to bo money available, and possibly this could W treaisd ss en investment portfolio, where the major portion is wed far the most good, but n small portion cwld G set aside for • demonstration project to show how this City enn produce affordable hwaing by using their stock of historic buildings. Councilwoman Nrlght felt it might W feNible Lf the intent was not nwsuarlly A..._.J- _{~__~ _T_J ._.w_._..In ..___.. _~...wJ._._.._ J... F_ J,.. ~_•_ •_,_.._. _A J......._.F_ _F.. _~_.. _JI F_ ~~..,J 1. i... ~ r as affordable houdng. Mayor stout Eelt a lot of these goals could be met. Be felt there was a primary reeponslbility because of the way tRs law Se structured, but also Eelt there was n rasponeibility to the community tc meei soma of these other goals. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, stated they ue currently working on the needs assessment survey for the eftordebls Rousing program, and after they OeUrmiw who are tRe people they would W serving and their needs, Lhsn they would bo Lwking et programs to meet those needs. She stated tasy would luep these ideas in mind when developing levee programs. Com,siesioner Preston felt that praeervntion works batter when LRe community understands the economic 6anefits to ell citizens, that it is not en al its thing for ~Jgh inccm¢ pocplo. Councilwoman Brown stated she was surprised at who aMUally fits into the oategories for loo Income housing, end felt that about 501 of the pwple living in the City would quality for living in atlordsble Rousing. Cwomlulowr Bantu rtated she wanted to see a plan developed and the money spent !or the Mnsfii of tM cosmunity, she didn't pent to see it expire. City Council Minutes January 9, 1990 Page 6 Councilwoman Brown stated possibly nt tea next houainq task force meeting, staff could present a report covering haw thane ideas Mould fit Into the houainq etlt aside fund, but that they should start moving on these ideas with the $50,000.00. Linda Daniels, Deputy Clty Manager, stator thw p>u,LO~.i.O cuuiu ., .iy i.e ue~: is a Redevelopment projeM arse, whose boundaries wexe from Highland Avenue on the north to 4th Stzeat on the scuth, Archibald Avenue on the west to Btiwenda Avenue on the east. she elated again that they were not at the point of developing projects wLtR the affordable housing funds yei, but they would put these ideas on the list. Co®ieeioner Banks felt Stiaanda Avenue would ba m ideal place to purchase land due to the vacant land Ln the area and th'e many historical landmarks and older homes on that street already. Mayor Stout felt the options rnuld be explored through the Cammieeion, and with the city coming up to a budget cyola, parhnpa staff can help refine soma of thane idea,. and mske suggestions during the budget cycle of whet they can do now to make thew ideas work. • : R ~ r C3. Commiesionar Preston Kated the CamLsion had a discuolon relating to a budget, and felt the Council should keep tMir thought^ open with respecE to Lama of the .....~. ~.. ~~~ ~~. 1a....li .~i ..c ~..c ... ~~.. ~.. ..y r...y...., .... an ordinance is Winq prepared on that iewe. State Vlaw requires eau typo of mitigation program along with that, and of the lint o! Llama they rwiewed some of them required funding sources, which might be Community Devalopnient Block Grant funds, Redevelopment Agency funds, etc., eo that historic buildings could be rehabilitated. They have also discussed the Santa Pe Railroad Station and the possibility of daeignating it sa a landmark, the archives which would need a money source to continue development of that, end n funding source to continue the survey krork for daterminlnq if structures should be landmarks or not. Mayor Stout stated hs thought the City should hire a profsselonal to conduct an oral history program o! long time residents, and that it should Ue started ea Loon as possible. Commissioner Banks stated that the Oniulo library had done s similar progzms. Commissioner Amer stated the Upland library also has done Chst type of a program. Chairman ectwldt asked it the Community ^oundetion was working on any type of en orsl history project. Mayor Stout stated he knows that aoanone had donated a sum s mwney to do • vidsotspe history, but diAn't know the status of that project. City Council Minutes January 9r 1990 Page ~ Chairman Schmidt stated he moss concerned about people who have aid pleturee in their homes tnaG should De in the archives, and cooing up with a way of communicating to them tM poesiDility of letting the Commission borrow Lhem to make copies without making them feel they were being forced to do this. Mayor Stout /fated that moss why ha felt it moss important to hire a profeeeional that would know not only how ro deal with people without intimidating them, but would eieo be able to reiay the in£otmntion 9nth/rad in an entertaining way. Councilwoman Wzlght felt there were federal grant. e..e±l~wii t,. ..d:y tuns oral histories and w/ might want to e/plore that poe/ibil ity. She also felt it was appropriate to have a proEe/eional conduct an oral history. Mayor Stout felt that time was o[ the essence on thin type of project and he would like to sae funds budgeted Eor this. Commissioner Preston eakad wnat type o! input mould the Council like to see from the commi/eion Gnat would need io G budgeted for. Mayor Stout stated the Commission /houldn't a/aume the Council knows everything that Se going on. Councilwoman Wrignt /rated the Commission also enouldn't aseuaa that there wasn't money available for certain projects. she stated the Council would et ill like to receive euggeetions and know what era came of tM opportunltio out there. Councilwoman Brown /rated that since Rancho Cucamonga ha/ been enosen Lo De e c try wttn en Operit lag stet ion on the aeni8 Pe 11ne, maybe one of Ln0 hl atoYlcal homes 1n the Ciiy could be refurbished io be the stet ion. sae st eted that 9[WBac would De contributing a cum of money to eat up a station, so posei6ly they could uea that money to relocate a home or the old /ration to the location at eth and Haven and relurblsh it. Coamieeioner Bank/ /fated the is/ue of designating the old station a landmeck was going to be coming Wfore Council Ln Pebruary. Commissioner Billing/ /rated he felt the /ration would ba ebls to ba restored to ire original form. Mayor stout uk/d i! hadn't the City received • letter Etas ssnta 8e stating the! lE the City didn't do sametning wicn Lne station, 9snte Pe was going to tear it down. Rick Comsr, Community Dewlopawnt Director, stated that was cottset and fast a letter has been sent to the people coordinating the coamwtsr rail fast tnsy anould coordinate between the operating division and the land division, and try Co get the two parties together to seconclU their difference/. City Council Ninutee January 9, 1990 Page 8 Councilwoman Brown stated they would hew to see how much money SANBAG moos going to contribute for a station and platform, but that the City ie supposed to be up and moving Dy July 1991. She felt it would bar sealer to use the existing atation that just needed renovation instead of alerting from scratch. She further stated that as she and Rick Gomez bring back more information on the commuter rail, they would work with the Commission on the atation. Aick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated there was also a tecMical committee starting uo to halo advise on the cammter call docetiore, so they will keep the Commission apprised u more details Mvalop. commissioner eenxe stated she moos concerned about the negative reaction of some homeowners when Lhair property was being considered for historic landmark designation. 3ha felt the more money the Council was willing to commit to historic preservation, and possibly offering incentl vee to the homeowners, it would benefit the community and Mlp mslu the homeowner's attitude more positive about the situation. R R R R R Cd. Nsyor Siout stated M wmied the Commies ion not only to identify places of historic value in the community, out also to examine ideas regarding how the City Le developing now that will G historic in 50 years or morn, so that they can start doing soma things in a more tubtul manner. Commissioner arnar eked what the Council would like them to do regarding a historian. Nayor stout thought they should outline. what they would like a historian io do, and then go out for bide on the project. Commissioner Banks felt a historian moos not a major budget eoneidarntion enO inquired if they mould need to wait for the next budget or could they gat started on it now, or even on any project of that scale. Mayor stout stated that with all the other things that are happening ha doubted ihai !t could Dm acted upon thae quickly. Xe thought it might W auumar Wfors they could get iL in place. Coaa:issionar Banks agreed that tL-.a was of the esaeroa in atartirg this project. Jnck ism, City Nengar, Kated tM City budget cycle stsrte in February, w now would W a good Lima for tM Commission to prepare idsea end propose Chas am part of the Dudgst. Couneiiwaman Nright stated she was inisrntad in having markers that would direct paopU to historical designations Sn the City. Shm fmlt that avan i! LM money wu not readily available a! the prnant, the idu should b• given to Council so they could try to find funds in the tutus for it. City Council Minutes January 9, 1990 Page 9 Canmlee icner Banks felt the markers should M generic since many of the historical bows arv reeidencee. ...,, r rreecon xvrc me marxars the City oL Ban Jose wee using were excellent .1Q Coamieeioner Banks etstad mrother proposal was the recognition of historical f iguree through street names. she stated the Caasfiseion sae proposed this In the poet but it hoe not oe•n used. Hayor Stout asked if they had a list compiled. Brad Buller, City Planner, stntsd they do have s list of names that they show to the developers, but they usually don't ues them because they say they era too hard to pronounce. Me stated they are coming Mfore Council on January 17 on the street naming policy, and tn.c en.y often cry to pz•-name iM et re•te through Planning eiaff. Councilwoman Brown stated that wyM if a historical new was used for n street, there would M sway it could M shown on the street sign. Chsirman Schmidt felt saw type of brochure should M done up for wMn new people cane to town that would give them the bask layout of tM community and same of the hletory. Councilwoman Gram tslt sawthing lilu that should W distributed LhrougA the Chamber of Commerce sine. tMt was usually where new resident. want to find out information about the coamunity. • R • • R R D. COMMDIfIC11TION8 PEOM THE PDELIC There were none. • • R • • f AATdHEEI®ff MOTION: Hovsd by Brown, seconded by 111exendsr to adyourn. Motion carrl•d unanimously, 4-0-1 (Baguet abeant ). The meeting ndiournsd et 4:34 p.m. Msp•ctfu lly submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy Clty CLrk l~ppsovsd by Historic Preservation CommLsiono nbruary 1, 1990 approved by Clty Council: January 17, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA CZTY COUNCIL MINCTE9 A regular meet ing oY the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, January 17, 1990, in Lhe Lions Psrk Community Center, 9161 Saee Line Aoad, Aancho Cucamonga, Glifornia. The meeting was celled to order at 7:33 p. m, by Nayor Donnie L. Stout. Present wars Councilmsmberss William J. Alexander, Charles J. euquei, Paagla J. Nright, end Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present wares Jaok Lam, City Nenager; James Narkman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniel e, Deputy City NanagerJ Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Mnnagsr; Rick Gomez, Community DevelopmsnL Director/ LeAnn 9mothare, ADA Analyst; eratl Suller, City Planners Den Coleman, Principal Planner? Larry Nendereon, Principal Planner; Alan Wetren, AssoCLab Planners Cindy Norris, Auistant Planners Rues ..-y..:.., .r ~••y...~~.r +•.... .. - DeyuLr v Lr -uyiumi, Jii.iw,., ut. Civil Bngineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil 8ngineers Jw 8tofa, ~yAOOCiete Clvll Bngineer; Barbara Rrnll, Aesistnnt Civil Bngineert Monte Preacher, Public Works %ngineer; Jerry Grnnt, Building Officials Jim Martin, Plan Check Coordinator; Jim mhomae, Building Inspection Supervisor; Carlos Silva, Aehabilitet ion Specialist; Joe Schultz, Community Services Managers Paula Pachon, Adlminieirative Auisiants Jim Hart, Administrative Services Directors Duane Baker, 9r. Adminiattetiva Assistants Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analysts Susan Mlckay, Administrative Aides Petty Rltfsl, Executive Auistants Jan Sutton, Deputy Clty Clerk} Chiet Dennis Nichasl, Aancho Cucamonga Fira Protection DLetrict7 Capt. Eugene Gilmore, Rancho Cucamonga Shsziff'• Siat ions and Debra J. Adams, City Clark. Absent was Counc/1memWrs Deborah N. Brown. el. Presentation of 5-year service Plns to Comstissionsr Marsha Benka and Commissioner Susanne Chitiea. Neyor stout presented S-year Service Pine to Commiuloners Marsha Banks and ausanne Chitiea. Clty Council Minute January 17, 1990 Page 2 H2. Presentation of 10-year Service Pins to Commiasionsc 8ugene Billing and Commissioner Ada Cooper. Mayor Stout presented the 10-year Ssrvace Dana to Cw®iuiwnar kugene Biiiings. CommisaioneY Ada Cooper was absent. B3. preaentat ion of proclamations to Jim Thomas and Carlos Silva for theLr assistance to the City of ennta Crur following the October 17, 1959 earthquake. Mayor Stout preaantsd the proclamations to Jim Thomas and Carlos Silva of the Building and Safety Division. H4. Presentation 6y BoPark Enterprises. Mr. Parker of Bopark Enterprises presented a plaque to the City, which was an awnrd his company had won for the Archibald entry monument. 85. Recognition of Seaquicsntennial Steering Committee for their efforts in planning the City's 150th celebration of ^Ths Aancho". Mayor Stout made the preaentstiona. Bfi. Mayor Stout read a letter hw nod received free the Blood Bank thanking the Clty for its support of tMir blood driven. No communication wne made from the public. • ~ D. CDNEEM4 U' 1LONAE Jack Lam, city Nanagar, announced the corrected bid opening data for item D5, and also announced the corrected account number for Item D15. Councllwgoan Aright caked that Itas D10 W pulled for diwuuior.. D1. Approval of Minutes: November 28, 1989 D2. Approval of uarrante, AegUter Nos. 12/25/89 a^.d 1J10/90; a.:d payrcil ending 12/21J59 and 1(4/90 for the total amount of $2,5{3,495.11. DJ. Alcoholic Beverage Application foc On Sale Beer G Nlne dating place for EL Rey Mexican food and Nariacos, Dionicia eaima Beltran, 8117 Bawn Awnue. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application !or On Bale Bari Nine Ltinq PLw for sear Belly Eakery, JoM A. and Ilarienne E. BLOhola, 9007 Arrow Route, epaq 190. city Council Hinutee January 17, 1990 Page 3 D5. Approval to authorise tae advsrtiaing of the "Notice Inviting Bide" for the 19th Street Improvement Project, from the was! City limits to Carnelian Str9etr to be funded from Syetema Development, Account No. 22-4637-8743. RESOLUTION NO. 90-025 A RESOLUTION OB TN8 CITY COUNCIL OF TFiS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAISONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING Pi.ANS AND SPSCZFICATIONS FOA THE "19TH STREET INIPROVHNENT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AU'i'dOkZ Eiii0 nbu -vinbLiinO Tm LiTY CZwnb IO iw'v7;nT iS'a :O RECEIVE EID9 D5. Approval to execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 90-007) with Ghe California Department of Tranaportetion and the City of Upland for the design and construction of a traffic aignel at 19th Street (Route 30) and Sapphire Street. The preliminary eatimata of coal in the agreement ace igne Rancho Cucamonga a share of $35,475.00 which repreaente 25\ of the total. This will be funded from the Tranaportntian Development Account Nc. 12-6637-8919. RESOLUTION NO. 90-026 A RESOLUTION O! THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TH6 HIHCUTION OF A COOPEIUITIVE AGpEElRNT NITN TIDE CALIFORNIA OBPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF VPLANU M7R THE DHSIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON 19TH STIIHET (ROUTE 30) AT SAPPFIIPE STREET D7. Approval to execute Contract Caange Order No. 2 (CO 89-073) with Don creek and Aseociatee to provide additional engineering eervlcea for expanded scope of work on 19th 9traat connection to Highland Avenue, Phase II - Hiqalnnd Avenue east of Havsn Avenue end Haven Avenue from 19th Street to Haven Village Driveway. The Caenga Order is for the total amount of $3,300.00 to bring the contract total to $28,132.00 to W paid from Syatema Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8852. O8. Approval o! liacal Yaer 1988-89 City Annual Audit. 09. Approval of Authoriratlon to sign Small Claims Court documeMa. RESOLUTION NO. BI-15dB A RESOLUTION O! TIOI CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP AANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOMIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. Al-156D AND NAMING TNOBE INDIVIDOALB NBO HILL EE ALLONED TO SIGN BHALL CLAIMB COURT DOCOlQNTB D10. Approval of tea Banner pollry and appropriation of $12,000.00 fsom tM undeaignatad balance of Fund 2$ !os dulgn, purchaaa, and installation of the banner poles. ITOI pIH.1.ED IOR DfECUEEION EY ODIIMCILNOMAM NEIOET. City Council Ninuto January 17, 1990 Page 6 D11. Approval to allocate $1,200.00 for conference fees for the Cal ifornla SpecLallsad Training Institute for the Public Safety Cammisslon. D12. Approval of Lh• Snvironmantal Initial Study, Pmts I and II, for Phase I lmprovement• co tns cucamongs storm oraln. A resolution accepting and approving the Initial Studiee and the issuing of a Cstagorical Exemption for the project ie attached. AESOLOTION NO. 90-027 A RESOLOTION OP TF$ CITY COONCIL OP TN6 CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALSPOANIA, APPROVTNG TTOS ENVIAONNSNTAL SNITI AI. STODY ANO SSSDANCB OP A CATEGORICAL BAENPTION IOR TfDE PROPOSED PRASE I IMPROVElRNTS 1'O TBE CDCAIeDNOA BTORM GRAIN D13. Approval to law/puseMw two (2) truclu, conventional cab-eheuis with avxlifications for Asphalt Path truck bed, to W purehas•d free oistsrich International Truck Sales, inrnrporat•d of San Bernardino, California in thv amount of 5223,399.03, to W funded Eros two account numbers, LG. S. Account No. 72-6225-7065 and General Account Pund No. 01-4647-7015. D19. Approval to award and authorization for execution o! contract (CO 90-008) for Saae Line Road Strwt Improvements, Storm Drain and TratPic Signals improvement project, from west of Victoria Park Lane to went of InLerstete 15 to Gentry Brothers Incorporated for the amount of 51,547,076.00 ($1.473,405.50 plus Si contingency), to N funded with 8yst•ms 0•velop.mnt Aeeount Aos. 22- 4637-8940, 22-4637-0941 and 22-4637-8730 and Etiwanda Drainage Account No. 19- D15. Approval to award and autROri:atlon for execution of contrecL (CO 90-009) for Arrow Routs Street Improvements, Phaw II, located on the south aide of Arrow Route, from Archibald Avnve to Hermosa Avenue, including the Traffic Signal at Arrow Aoub and A•rmosa Avenue and the Traflic Slgnal upgrade at Arrow Route end Archibald Avenue to Nobessaly Engineerlnq, incorporated for the aawunt of $507,560.00 ($461,399.91 plus lOZ contingency), Lo W funded with Sytwe Developamnt Account No. 22-6637-8735 and 22-4637-8945. 016. Approval Lo award and autAorization to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 90-010) with Ramco Consultants for the acquirition of right-of- way for tM aalignmsne of the Poothlll Boulevard - Rochester Avenue intsrwction and tM ineGllation of traffic signet. The consultant's tee of $12,760.00 ($11,600.00 plus IOi contingency) la to Tx funded from the Tran.porLation Dw•lopwnt Account 12-4637-8705. City Council Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 5 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-OT8 A RESOLUTION OP TNR CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIPORRIA, APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION Iron 6XECOTION OP A PROVe?Blnwar_ ..._ '-::awrnT KITH RM7C0 CONSULTANTS FOR THE ACQUISITION TOlV RIGRT-OF-WAY FOR TNS R1DILIGNlRNT OP TH6 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - ROCHESTER AVSNUS INTBRSECfION AND TR6 INSTALLATION OP TRAFFIC SIGNALS __.. „pp.uval to award and autnozizetion to axecuie • Professional Services Agreement (CO 90-011) with OGA Consultants, InwrpOreied for the deeign of intersection and traffic signal improvements aC the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The eonaultant fee will be $30,685.00 ($13,350.00 plus a l0a contingency) io bs funded from the Syetsm Dovalopoent Pund, Account No. 22-4637-8946. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-029 A R89OLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCLL OP TNB CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALL FOIU7IA, TO ANAAD AND AUTHORIZATION POR EYSCOTION OF PAO]BSSIONAL 98RVICES AORBRDSNT WITH DGA CONSULTANTS, INC. IOR PREPARATION O! PLANS AND SPECIlICATIONS YOR A DESION OF INTEASRCfION AND TRAFFIC eIONAL INPROVEl~NTS AT THB INTER88CTION OP FOOTHILL WULBVAND AND NAVBN AVENUB D18. Approval to award and execute the Profeeaional 8eroicee Agreement (CO 90- 012) for Impaction eervlcss fox tM Hasa Lana Beautification Project, hrnalien _____ -~•••_~ ._°_.-- - ---..-........ -Wyse u~?a VJwu u, to NBS/LOw[y 6nginserinq~for~ tM ,amount of $40,T80.~00 Co W funded from Beautification Account Nos. 23-4637-8793 and 21-4647-8046 and Street Rehabilitation Nnds, Account No. 09-4637-8813. D19. Approval of Profeeaional eervicea Agreement (CO 90-013) by Wildan Aeeociatee for Community Development Block Grant Administration and also for administration and implementation of the housing repair and rehabilitation program far an amount not to exceed 571,026.00. D20. Approval of indentures between Southern Paeltic Trenepoctation Company and the City for construction of an 18 inch Storm Dtain (CO 90-014) and a T6 loch connector and riser (CO 90-015) at AocMater Avenue, north of Baee Lim Road and approval of related agreements Detween Tha Nilllam Lyon Caapsny and Lhe City. RPSOLUTZON NC. 90-030 A AB8OLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL O! TIR CITY OP IUNCHO CUCAMOIfOA, CALIlOANIA, APPItOVINO AOAEDRIITS NTTH 80UTIRRN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CWO?ANY FOR CONBTRUCTION OP AN 18-INCA STORK DRAIN AND A 24-INCA CONNECTOR AND RISER AT ROCHESTER NORTH OF 8718E LINE ROAD City Council Minutia January 17, 1990 Page 6 021. Approval to ixecuis Change Ordez No. 1 (CO 89-001) to the PYOfeBeional Service! Agreement with Pareone, Brinekerhoff, quads and Douglas for the deeign of modifications to the Foothill Boulevard - Route 35 interchange. Amount of * ~ _~ °_ __ ~__ __~.~~ _~- 3.. -. ., v uv vcvpv ac cna vea iqn worn. Funding-has been .approved from fthi Redevelopment Agency Account No. 13-50300, resulting in a total contract amount of 5191,800.00. D42. Approval to accegt Improvement e, Relsaae of Honda and Notice of Coalpietton for: COY g7-i6 loc fed n th th t f F thn g l d d Hermosa Avenues. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $397,965.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-031 A ABSOLUTIOA OF TB6 CITY COUNCIL OF TN6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINC TBE PUBLIC IMPA0V8MBNT3 FOR COP 87-16 AND AUTAOAIEING THB PZLING OF A NOTICB OF COMPLBTION POR TfiS WDAB OR 88-OB located on tN north side of 7th Streit bat H llm A en •e and Azchibeld Avenue Pnithful Performance Bond (street) $ 30,000.00 iua/VV~~Vn nV• YV-ViL A ABSOLDTION or ITa clTr coDNCIL or TIa clTx of AANCHo WCAlbNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINC TH8 PUBLIC IMPAOVBNANTS FOR OR 88-03 AND AUTHORS EINC TFR PILINO 08 A NOTICB OF COHPLBTION POR THB WORK Parcel Mao 9504 located on th rthsaet Co ne of ease 'ni Pad d Hevan Avenue Pa ithful Performance Bond (8treet) 5400,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Storm Drain and Undirgroundin9) $315,000.00 R680LVTION NO. 90-033 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TFDI CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THi PUBLIC IMPR0VElO1NT3 POR PARCEL NAP 9504 ARO AUTNOAIEIN6 TIR TILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION TOR TBE NORR NOTION: Moved 6y Alexander, weondid by Nslght to approve the Consent Calendar u corrected with the ixwption of Item D10. Motion circled unanimously, 4-0- 1 (Brown absent). City Council Minuiee January 17, 1990 Page 7 • f • • • R DIBCOEBION OF ITEM D10. Approval et !De Lamar pollry and approprLtiea of L1].000.m t~ two ..M«Ien.tM 4laare n! !eanA 7t s„r ne~~~ _ ~ __. a...I insta11at1oD of LDe Damar poles. ~ - Councilwoman Nright stated shs wmtsd thin item pulled for diacueeion becauee she was concerned with the coat for whet was Mina described ae Dnnnera. She added that when diesveeiona had taken place prior to tonlgaY when ahs mentioned Dennere, she was talking about banners Chat hang from light poles, not the banners that are strung acroaa the street. She stetad she did not have any obfection to thin, but felt Lha smaller Gamer issue should M addressed, she also added she had received information that the smaller Danners were S65 each. nick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated as has the information on what Councilwoman Nright U talking about and would Nava Lt available et the next Council meeting. MOTION: Novad by Alexander, seconded by BuqueY io approve Item D10. Motion carried unanimously 4-D-1, (Brown abseni~. • • R • f • Councilman euqust requotsd Item I9 W axrved forward on the agenda due to the number of people preunt !or this item. Tae Council wncurredj aoaever the minutes will remain !n agenda ordmr. Mayor Stout requested Item No. E4 M removed for diacuesion. El. CONSIDEMTION OF A FILM PERMIT ORDIN7iNC6 - A dme Cucs_ Munlci 1 C^^e urteinin- to set 11 hl G a fit rmit r ces ORDINANCE NO. 410 (second reading( AN ORDINANCE OF TIDE CITY COUNCIL OF TIa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEN CHAPTER 5.16 TO THE RANCHO COCAMONGA MONICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TR6 FILMING PERMIT PROCESB 62. CONSIDERATION TO TIR AaNCNO CD • A ICIP CODt EY DIM: A NEf1 CHAPTER 19.16 AND ADDING A Md SECTION 17 D2 13 PERTAINING TO mIR City Council Nlnuts• January 17, 1990 Page S ORDINANCE NO. 411 (second rend lag) AN Onn laRa~ n~ 7°'C t`T"'Y MtlNC+•. ae a+!R t•.my nn nnvrv.. CUCANONGA, CALIFOAIPIA, ADIIING A NSW CNAPTBR 19.16, ANO ADDING A NSW BECTION 17.02 .135r TG THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO ESTABLISHING XERISCAPB REOUIRENBNTS S3. CONSI- aTZOH OP T Bt ISHZN- P--D ivrme ~N FA- ROh2 WAY. PINTAGE DRiVn. --vcri Tn SEaa'. iu+0 VICTORIA Pavx •.awx ORDINANCE No. 413 (second reading) AN OADINANC6 OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALI POAMIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THB RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY 0008, RAGARDING PRIMA FACIE 3PSSII L:HITS UPON CBATAIN CITY STRBSTS Debtn J. Adams, City C1•rk, read the iitlee of Ordinance No•. 410, 411 and 413. MOTION: Moved by Nilght, seconded by Alexander to waive full reeding and approve Ordinance Noa. 410, 411 and 413. Notion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown absent). • . • • ~ S4. CONSIDERATION OP SxaTBBQas9 OADIN C6 > COMlRNDBD TO Tfi CITY Bl- TH6 PUBLIC SAFETY COlO1ISSION - Ordinance Netrlctinq the uN OL skateboards in -.. r.. .. :yt. ...- .r. Hnyor Stout e[aGd the reason h• roved Item No. 64 !or discuss ion was because of a letter the City council had received from Mark Nhit•head, whereby ae had euggeeted i) that n preamble be sdded to the ordinance which would state ^that the Olty Council is s•neliive to tea issue of skateboarding as a means of transportation of the CLLy•s yeutA, ae well as a popular recreational and eelf- expraesive activityt end the City Council, being concerned for the general welfare of the people, hereby finds that in Lh• interest of the public safety it is necessary to regulate the use end op•rat ion o[ roller skates, ekatsboarde end similar devices^, which Mayor Stout stated ae had no objection toy and 2) which exanpte from the Ordinanw areas or etrwb where there are no sidewalks adjacent, end stated he has considered that and would not be in favor of thin amendment. Councilxan Alexnadar atatod ha is ir. favoe of the skateboard Ordinnnn ens did not feel it should b changed, but felt Jw Schultr, Caawunity Services Mansg•r, should bo directed toward • park activity to accaaa+odaN tae skateboard rider. The City Council concurred with the pr•amDl• as esgqubd by Mr. MhLtehead. Hnyor stout opened the meeting foe public inpu[. Addressing the City Council wre: City Connell Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 9 Nark Whitehead, 7050 Novara Place, stated he was suggeaiing this be put in the Ordinance because ha felt an Lndividuel should be allowed to ride vhere tMre era no •idevalka. Mark Solomon, 1207 Manzanita atatad there era no aidewalke in hie neighborhood and asked if he would bs ticketed for riding in the street. He Eelt this waa unfair, and caked Lf ha would W harassed for riding at the park. Mayor Stout stated none of the City parks are pnatad ^no skateboards". ORDINANCE N0. 414 (second reading) AN ORDINANCB OP 2HE CITY COUNCIL O! THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALZPORNZA, ADDIRG CHAPTER 1C.68 SO THS AANCHC COCJU(ONGA MONICIYAL ODDS PERTAINING TO TSB USB OP ROLLBA SEATES AND eINILAA DEVICES IN CERTAIN AREA9 NOTION: Novad by 9t out, aacondM by Alexander to waive full reeding and approve Ordinance No. 414 with the euggeatad preamble by Mark Whitehead. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown abeam). • • R f • f P1. CONSIDERATION OP ADOPTION O! UPDATED VERSIONS O! VNIPONM CODBS POR _.. __..__... _.. _.._ ......_._.._ auu rapors praesnca4 by lack Lam, Clty Manager, and Jerry Grant, euildinq Officlai. Mayor Stout commanded Mr. Grant for h1e efforts in getting Chace codes adopted. Mayor Stout opened iho mwtinq foc public hearing. Thee being no reaponee the puhlic hearing waa closed. ORDINANCE N0. 412 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OB RA[iCNO COCAMOIIaA, CAI.SPORNIA, AMENDIIIa CHAPTERS 1s.04, 3s.OB, 1s-12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.38, 15.32, 15.36, 15.10, ANO 15.44 OF TITLE 15, BUILUINfie AND OONBTROCTION, OP TIR NWCHO CUCAMONGA MINICSYAL CODE AND ADOPTI1/a BY AEPERBNCE THE "UNIPORN ACMIEZSTRATSVE CODE', 1988 ELSZTSOHJ THB UIQ:PGBN BUILDING CODE, 1988 EDITION INCLUDING ALL APPENDICLe THERETO! THE "UNIIORM BUILDING CODs BTANDAI108", 1988 EDITION! THE "UN2PORM MECHANICAL CODE", 1988 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO! THE "ONIlORN PLOMEINO CODE", 1988 EDITION INCLUDING i h. i. N_ r City Council Ninutee January 17r 1990 Pages 10 ALL APPEIIDIC63f TFSB' "UHIPORM CODE POR TBH ABATSMSNT OP DANGSROUS BVILDINGS", 1988 BOITION: TfOS "UNIFORM HOUSING ^_^_::^ 1388 iwITIDN~ i~ ^UN irONf dJ ZLD1NG SSCURI':Y CODS^, 1988 SDZTIDNI AND THE "ONIPOPM SIGN CODS^, 1988 BDITION7 WITH CERTAZN AMSNOMENTS, ADDITIONS, DSLSTIONS AND PXCBPTIONS TO SAID COOBS, INCLUDING PENALTI63 Debra J. Adams. City Clerk, reed the title of Ordinance Nn. 412. NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 412. Motion carried unmimouely, 4-0-1 (Brown absent ~. RESOLOTION NO. 90-03d A RSSOLVTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OF RANCHO COCAMOIPGAr CALIFORNIA, 101EI N6 SAPAESS PINDINOS OF NEED !OR LOCAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATS BUILDING STANDARDS CODS MOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Alexander to approve ReeolutiOn Ne. 90- 034. Notion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (BCOwn absent). • • • a • s P2. PROM-5150.000.00 1'O 5113.000.00 TO BE PAID tPOM A8BE8&10!!Pf DIeTAICT NO. 84-2 PONDS - ACCOUNT NO. 81-4637-6028 (COatianed tm January 7, 1990) Staff report presented by Mlke Olivier, er. Civll Ingineez. Hayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 90-035 A RESOLUTION OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ANARDIH6 AND AUTNORIEIN6 6EECUTION OP THE CONTMCf POR TIII CONBTAUCTION O! CERTAIN PUBLIC NORRS OF IMPAOV6IRNT IN A SPECIAL ASSE89NENT DIBTRICT RSSOLUTIOA 90. 9C=C 36 A R680LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIR CITY O! AANCRO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDEAINO CERTAIN CBANOE8 AND MODIFICATIONe iN T0e HOAR IM A SPECIAL ABSE88lRNT DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by euQuet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nos. 90- 034 end 90-036. Motion carried unanieously, 4-0-1 (Beam absent). City Council Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 11 P3. DSVELOPMBNT AGRSE[~NT 87-01 - GREAT NESTEAN MOTELS CORPORATION - A requ6eC to amentl the Agreement io allow a hotel within the Poolhill Design and Commercial Center located south of Poothill Boulevard and east of spruce Avenue. staff report presented by Osn Coleman, Principal Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting For public hearing. Addreeeing eha City Council wee: Leonard Ramos, stated he would address any quest ions the City Council has £or this project. There being no further reepon ee, the public hearing waa closed. ORDSNANCE NO. 615 (first reading) AN 0RDIN1INCE OP TRS CITY COUNCIL O] Tfffi CITY OB RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALI POANIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. I TO AN EXISTING DEVELOPlRNT AOREElfdNT POR A ROTEL RITRIN TRB FOOTHILL nBSICN AND COlO~RCIAL CENTER Debra J. Adams, City C~.erk, reed the Lit le of Ordinance No. 415. MOTION: Moved by Nright, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set second reeding for February 7, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown absent). e • • • + P4. O RANCHO CUCANONGA - A request to eawnQ Section IV, Environmental Resources, and Section V, Public Safety, elements of the General Plan ae they relate to hit leida development end grading and will involve revising the def Snit ions of hit hide from 10 percent or greater to S percent of greater, ae well ae restricting devslopaant on slopes which era 30 percent or greater. Staff report end slide preentation by CSndy Norris, Assistant Planner. Mayor Stout opened eh. nesting for public hearing. Addreeeing the City Council were: Richard Douglas, 130 N. Lincoln, Corona, of Landmsrk Development stated h. is supportive of what staff is proposing. Na staeW that as tM Ordinance is approved ii dwe allow fLxibillty In the slope standards. Roger Prance, 9942 8antino, who lives outside tM City limits Datwen Archibald and Narnwu, stated flay have bean trying to gat a road built in his are and felt this ordinance would prohibit the coed tram going in. Ha [alt tM Ordinance would ruin the natural landwapinq in this area, and felt theca should W soave kind of exception when there era four antes or tau w that there is scare flexibility. City Council Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 12 xhere being no further response, the public hearing wee closed. n -!)man alexaMer eekM !s f}. e!_~ -'_t_i_! 9__ __. ____ _.._-_ Cindy Norris, Resistant Plennar, elated yes and Eurther clarified this matter councilman Buquet felt there should Do soma consideration for special circumstances. Mayor Stout agreed, but felt staff should use discretion. Councilwomen Nright stated the one Seeue that hadn't been discussed was the density transfer iaa. She fall more diacuulon ahculd occur and that the density transfer needed to W token out of this Ordinance. Councilmen Baguet stated ha saw ibis ae a more conservative approach to the enhencament of development, and felt the density transfer were a aide issue. Ne added ha was more conwrned with how structures will be laid out on a hillside. Mayor Stout stated he felt thin should be approved. Councilwoman Nright stated there i• nothing she is willing Go trade off for density. R69OLUTI0N NO. 90-037 A AHSOLOTION OP TN6 CITY COONC IL OP TN6 CZTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIPOANIA, APPROVING OENHRAL PLAN APT.NDlDENT 89- 038 R84USSTING TO AlBND TNH SECTION IV, BNVIAONMBNTAL RBSOURCES AND 86CTION V, DVBLIC 9AP8TY HLBNBNTS OP TNB G%N%RAL PLAN A9 TH&Y ASLAT6 TO NILLSIDB DHVHLOPMBNT AND GRADING, PHVISING TN6 D6PINITI0N OP HILLSIDE TO INCLUOB SLOPBS 8 PBRCHNT OR OREATSA AS NHLL A9 RHSTRICTING DSVELOPNHNT ON SLOPHS 30 PHAC61Tf OR GAHATEA, AND MA%ING FINDINGS IN BUPPORT THBR80! MOTI0N1 Moved by Alexander, acondad by Buquat to approve Rseolut ion No. 90- 037. Motion oarilad 3-1-1 (Nright, not Broom ebant~. Councilwomen Nright stated aN voted no becaua she did not tai the Ordinance went tar enough in controlllnq density. BNVIRONMENTAL A88HSSIRNT AND DMLOPlRNT CODB ANENDMBNT 89-02 - CITY OP w1NeNO CuCAMONfiA - An amendment to Title 17 of the Municipal Code by adding Chapter 17.24, sections 17.24.030 through 17.24.090, 17.06.010.c. 1.g end 17.06.020.C.6I aaNndlnq subuctiona 17.06.010.6.5, 17.08.040.8 and C, city Council Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 13 17. 08.OSO.B. S, 17.18.020.D, 17.18.030. A, 17.18.030.C, 17.18.040.A.1, 17. 18.040.8. S.a, and 17.18.040.8.S.b/ and deleting subsections 17.O6.Ol0.E.5.a eetabliehment of guidelines and standards, for hillside development. ORDINANCE NO. 416 (first reading) AN OAD:NANCS OF THE C:TY COIINCIL OF THE CLIP' OF kANCEO CUCANONGA, GrLIFORHIA, APPROVING OSVBLOPAtnT GVOB AMGriuMaH~a~ 89-02, AIffiNDINC TITLE 17 OP THB MUNICIPAL CODE 8Y ADDING CHAPTER 17.24, SECTIONS 17.24.010 THROUGH 17.24.090, 17.06.010. C.1.G ANO 17.06.020.C.6~ AMENDING SVHSECTIONS 17.06.010.8.5, 17.08.040.8 ARD C, 17.OB.OSO.E. 5, 37.18.020.7, 17.18.030.A, 17.18.030.C, 17.18.040.!.1, 17.16.040.S.S.A, AND 17.18.040.8.5.8; AND DELETING SUB^E ^TIONS 17.06.030.8.5.A THROUGH F, 17.18.040.A.1.A THROUGR E AND 17-18.040.8.S.A.I TNROVGH ZV, NECARDING ESTABLISRHBH^_ OP GUIDELINES AND STANOAAD9 FOR HILLSIDB DBVSIApNBNT, AND NAEING PINDI NGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF Debra J. Adams, City Clark, read the title of Ordinance No. 416. MOTION: Roved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to valve full reading of Ordinance No. 416. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown absent ). MOTIONS Moved by 8uquet, seconded by Alsznndar to set second reading of ordinance No. 416 at the Fabrusry 7, 1990 mwting. Motion certiad 3-1-1 ~zr ignc, nod arawn aownc). Councilwoman Nright stated she rated no Dacnuee she did not feel the Ordinance went far enough in controlling density. • • f Mayor Stout called a receu at 9130 P. m. Jack Lam, City Henager, announced the city council would M in Ezecuti+e Session rsgerding litigation with Warner Consulting (Cowgirl). Ths ageting reconvened at 9:52 p.m. with all members of Council present (Brown abrent). • : . • ~ ~ P5. BNVIRONMBNTAL A89S99MBNT AND CONDITIONAL VSE PERMIT HB-18 - DIVER,~IPIP,a'D - Appaal of the Plarmiug Oi~ieaion decision requiring (1) Payment of currant in- lieu face for tAe coat of the construction o! iha Haven median island from Lemon Avenue to the projact'^ southerly driveway, and (2) the conetruotlon of the Navas median island from the projret'e southerly drlvsway to ae Tar se Highland Awnus for iha dwelopaont of • teat food rutsurant pad in the Neighborhood Cogmwtclel District on the nortMut corer of Highland and Haven Awnuss - APR 201-271-66. Staff report by Berbera Icrsll, Afsletant Civil Engineer. City Council Nlnutee January 17, 1990 Page 14 Mayor Stoui opened the meeting for public haarlnq. Addreselnq Lha Council wee: John O•Meare, oiveraiflyd Shopping Gntsrs, preaentetl background theirTzequiraments.' Be added they have Dean requested to payV$1R9,000.00 in fees for Mc0onalde which Se a 5,000 square foot building. He felt the amount of tree they era psyinq for Chis project was unfair. Councilman Alexander asked it there was any proof to support what Br. o•Meara was saying. Ruse Magui -e, City Engineer, stated there ie nothing in the Pile to prove this. where being no further response, the publLC hearing was closed. Councilman AUxandar stated M did not know if the coat should be jacked up at this point without the approyriate documentation to support Lt. Mayor stout stated he agreed with CounciLOan Alexander es far ae documentation, and furttwr stated ho agreed with LM Planning Ca®SUion. Councilmambera Alexmoer end Nrlghi concurred. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to deny the appeal. Motion carried unaniaously, 4-0-3 (8rgm sbaentl. A Resolution ie to come back at iM next meeting supporting this action. : • • e O. POSL'iC Ex1lNim/ia Rick Gomez, Comunity Devrlopawnt Director, 18Et the room prior to discussion of the next item. G1. TENTATIVB TRACT 13303 - LENIS ROIBS - M appeal of the Plnnning Cammlesion'^ decision to deny a request !or a time extension for a residential subdivision and design review o! 96 s1ngU family lola on 13.96 scree of land in the Terra Vista Planned Community designated Low-Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre( located at the aoulhwet cornet of Terra Vlata Parkway and Mountain View Driw -APB 447-151-13 and 11. stet! report presented by Dan Coleman, PrincLpal Planner. Mayor Stout aakod how they plan to qa aDeut rnac ..:nc thr strr.t rhst h55 yaen deleted from the trsot. Dan Coleman, Pcincdpal Planner, elated that presently tt.e mubr plan for this Brea shows that it will W gzeenwq•. ~, City Council Minutsa January 17, 1990 Page 15 Au9e Haguire, City Engineer, mated with Che deletion of thxe street the City %ngineer would not Rava round it in compliance with the tentative, and would have requested they go back and modify it to delete the street through the .-~a....i.-.y Ln~..~ccicn. James Markman, City Attorney, rtnesd N felt it would take special legislation by the Council to let them build ehia out even if they granted the ezteneion. Jeme9 Markman, Clty Attorney, stated ha was Lnvolved in many o£ the meetings, and felt it waa oafs to say there was not an agreement between the staff and Lewis Hoas ns to what was required es far as the baaine to qualify ea perks. He felt it waa a good faith dispute atwan the two parties ae to how the baaine became pnrka and stated it took a long time to resolve this, end during that time their mnp ran out. He stated as tai as looking to sa if their ap meets criteria to extend it, ha quest toned if there are changed circumstances that would change policy ea SL ie presented today. Mayor st:ui opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing eha City Council wee: Con Thompson, Lewis Haas orated he wanted to add to his letter hs And written, and Lold about the buin Luue. Ma [urther stated that with all that has gone on wLth thin ha felt that' hove been given sn extreme penalty for tr}~ing to cooperate with the City. Na stated he felt the Planning Commlasion Chair sympathised with Lewi• Names on the inequity of this, and felt it lieu of the City Ordinenca, he would have granted the extensLon. :a7Gr .......- ..-..-.. .. ............u........wiu cauwv ci.ie ueuc uw wn caueetgnec. Mz. Thanpaan stated yea. There being no further reaponae, the public hearing wne closed Councilman Buquet lelt tMre acre a lot of extenuating circumstnnces end tale there could hnw ban a batter way to qo Chen to deny the tract map. Councilman Alexander aLted he concurred. Mayor Stout qaw turiher background on the planning of this pro~set. Ne felt both the City and Lame Names wsro at fault in ehia setter. Ne stated he did not Eael the park space are epscilic encugh. James Mnrt~sa, C!ty Attorney, stated hs La rct aware of anyone that would cam. in end amend n tract map as far se chaaginq :treat ciignmenta and dste it beck to the data of the original map, and that it presents • problma. He elated that Lawia Homes says ehne aan twhnlcal problems, and stated it tM Council wanted to work on this they could. He stated he did think this presented • problem. City Council Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 16 Councilman Buquet elated he felt this should be a win-win s~~a~tlon, and felt there were equal problems on Doth aides of the issue. Re did not feel where eha City wee at right now was en appropriate resolution. He felt the City should qa ..a,.,. o.... ~e.~..e -..a.. ..... ep::_cf _c Ws-.. wnf..~t ia. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated if the City Council wants to do anything other than support the Planning Comsisaion'e decision that Mr. Marlaoan should re9eerch this. Councilman 9uquet felt this should Come back at the next meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 90-038 A RESOLUTION OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFOANSA, DENYING AN APPEAL OP THE PLANNING COKKI SS ION'S DECISION TO DENY A TINS 6%TSNSION POR TENTATIVE T1UfCT NO. 13303 - APN 227-191-13 ANO 16, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TRSREOP NOTION: Moved by AlexanMr, saeonded by Nright to continue the item to the Pebrusry 7, 1990 meeting to obtain additional information. Notion carried unaniawualy, 0-G-1 (Brown abunt). • w G2. CONSIDEAATION OP THE MODIFIED ALIGNMENT FDA 8U1D1IT AVENIR NEST OF BTIN A AVENDE TO TENTATIVE TRiCT 110 IsB12 - MATT BODTIaRK i m Sralf report presented by Dan Coleean, Principal planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Lorry Lewis, Nstt Southern California Development, 13812 Newport Avenue, Tuet in, prnented information on the project, and told about the negotiations M has been doing with the psopsrty owners involved. Me stated ha has asked the City to move forward with the condemnation prows. Ne wanted the City Council to know that he het put forth a good faith effort to get this resolved, sac! Baked thst they approve staff's recommaMation. Todd Peterson, Arendia, stated he was assured in 1986 that there would be no candsamation to iM buildings, end chat they weals apt hove any reduction to their lot yields. Na felt the fair eiarlwt velw is actually double what is being o[[ered to him, end added that would M • real hardship on h!m financially. John Chang, 9227 Haven, stated !My ors developing tM property nnr the Nett Nomss. Ne stated they went to qeL the etrueture built and that he is dedicating land to get the project completed. Ne felt ehf^ situation was unfair. City Council Ninutaa January 17, 1990 Page 17 Jamie Peterson, Arcadia, stated that this alignment would adversely affect him if this happened. Bill Barnu, 12719 Suxmit, stated he ie noG in total agreement with the idea of the aliyrmwnl, Cai .o .... .rg •_ q- c_°y .__.. _. -:_.-.._ .,,. previous alignment Ghat wee proposed. Lewis Trout, 7361 Leucite, after hearing the public testimony, stated he moss not aura the Natt Company gsve the property owners the opportunity to input into the process end subait valuation data for the appraisals a; par .. aryv .~.. pr .a.. .. Cou: c api.r -a,. right-of-way propoaalVthere needed to W sons consideration given to the property owners' situations because he did not fwl they have Caen treated fairly in the nsgotiations procsn. Jzmea Markman, City attorney, stated ha fait Nr. Trout•• canments were inappropriaG, that hs did wt understand all the oirewestancee, and advised the Council of the process the Clty mould go thzough prior to entering Into s formal condemnation. Nike Halm, 12749 Summit, did n.t feel the rosd should go straight through, and that he le not in favor o[ the alte_•nato presented tonight. Thews being no further response, tM :^`1 is hea:Rnq was closed. Aue• Nequire, city Rngineer, aada they are not asking for condasinet ion Lonight, only to approve the moditisd alignment, but that any naeeeaary condaanatlon wonld cnnr hank M t/v. Pmmnil .~ • la~ar A.~~ is n~na Councilwoman Nright stated ens dws remember tt!i conversations rot a take any property. l.ayor Stout felt the street ehculd go straight, and did not see any other way xo do this, but wouid like to sw it as safe as possible. Councilman august etatsd ha felt eha street should qo straight through. Councilmen aLxsnder stsisd h. qws along with staff'' recaamen~atlon. MOTION: Noved by Alexander, seeonded by Buquet Lo adopt the modified alignment. Notion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown aCunt~. : a G3. CQNSIDSAATION TO MOD1~ a CONDYTION _/l~_ APPAOVA7_q'O tLINY4 "a18 '~ INSTA..LATION o7 STFaiT TRBtB rOR ), SINC-ix lawlLY 8jpfj(r~.~ MDYTIOR <~N 13jp,J j~jCTORIa BTAxxT fAPN 227-121-22! etalf report presented by Dan James, ar. Clvl.' angineor. City Council Minute January 17, 1990 Page I8 Neyor Stout mpened the mooting Eor public hearing. addressing the City council wee: Jim Banks felt Lhe requirement of the new wind break should be ellmirated. _ ..._.. . .~~ _ ... e.... __ .. _ .~ a11tULd. ' councllroan segue[ erased M has a problem with planting the tress when they may die Mcnuee of the existing tress. Ns felt soma kind of improvement agreement should ha w~s.n - _ _____ ..a Caa.a7.. ~. ... __ _. .._ __ - ___. .._ ___ _ du. arr..,r. -_- __..._. Auee Maguire, City 8ngineer, suggoted Thai if the Council agrees vita Nr. Bunke, and states they do not want the old trees, he folt it would not M practienl to plans the new treee et Chat time, a¢ the other code section kicks in and a lien agreement could M recorded ne the coda requires, da£erring them to a later date. Ne lurther stated M did not think anybody dLagrsms wits not planting the other trees ¢t this ttms, that M wu noL recommending rasa at tM pz•esent time. Councilwoman Nriqht stated that with Lae City~s Trae Protection Ordinance we are trying to go in and do something against this. She did not know why rase was Mlnq discussed tonight. NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Nright not to kake the reeament, Dui record a lien agreement for the installation of tM future trees when it is necessary. Notion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Brown aDSant ~. a } „ • f. R Nl. CONBIDERaTION POR a_vP r. OP eaOL r:'IONa A_xixraRmip0 mnE eeaen Oy manamava OP SaN aNTON~f CdONNITY BOSPITaL aND T8E ea_w BERG IMO mONmY eo An Or S P AVIeem. SOPPORT IN x-EST -I86IN6 a [IM." eve OexTea NITNIN TN6 NRSTE N R66ION OP 8AN BERNARDI110 COONTY AS REOdeRNOED RY THE P ~I 8 ntmv CONNI ION Stiff report presented by Jaek Lam, City Manager. RESOLUTION NO. 90-039 a nEE000:ION os am cxTr maMOm or TxE CITY or RaacNo CUCaNONOa, CaLIrORNIa, RESPECfrULLY REQU68TINC THE BOARD Or TRUST669 Or SM aNTONiO COIOIgNITY N08PITaL EE-ESTABLISN LTS PACTLITY a8 a OESICNAPEh TkwUNA CBaTRR NITBIM SAN BERNaRDIN0 COfINTf City Council Minutae January 17, 1990 Page 19 RHSOLDTIOq NO. 90-040 A AESOLOTION OP TB6 CITY COUNCIL OF TNH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, RESPBCTFVLLY MAEING REQUEST TO THH BOARD 01 SUPEAVIdOR.4 OP eAN BEANAADINO COUNTY FOR SUPPORT IN RE-85TABLISBING A TRAUMA CARE FACILITY IN THE WBSTERN RHGION OP SAN BEANARDINO COUNTY NOTION: Hoved by Buqust, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nce. 90- 039 and 90-040. Motion carried un.~~ _lg, 3-u-I (Nnght, Brown absent). . ~ . . . . H2. RBCOlOffiNDSD STAUCTGRB/BOB.TRCT NATTER POR TNH SNVIRONMBNT7~. k NAGE NT COMMISSION AND RHCOMNBNDHO APPDINTNHNTS TO TRS COMMISSION Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. Lewis Trout, 7861 Lwcita, and rapraaentinq the membership of the San Gorgonio Chapter of the sLrra Club, cosnlsnded the pxopoeel submitted. He expreuad hU opinion on tM lssuss to be worked on by the Ccamiuion and intorawx! ihs Council of other issues that the Commission could Nork on. Jack Lam attend thle proposal does not preclude looking at Mr. Trovt'a suggest ions, but that the issue was only providing a budget for meetings which they rrould qo out of town to. ila stated that any otMr programs the commlaaion waa involved in would cow back to the City Council for approvsl. Councilwoman NrighL invited Mr. Trout to attend this new CoaWieefon'a meetings. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Stout to approve the proposed structure. xot ion carried unanimously, 4-0-3 (Brown absent). ~ ~ ~ . N3. CONSIDERATION Ol EFECUTION OP MBNOnAwDiry Ol DRDEASTA.wnIN6 IW 90-0161 9BTWEEN r.TA tua~, CE ar. un ETI A e DI TRICT TAE axCSO C• CAa~^-FcP. SNBRIPP'9 STATION. AND THE CITY OP RiermO CUCAMONOA TO Erp naa ~g IMPLEMENTATION O- TBE ORDO eOBE ESIBT xnx EDr aTION IDAREI PRODRIIN Staff report preunted by Jaek Lam, Clty Manager. Deputy Gases, eherifP ^ Department - x.apsrla, presented lnformetion on the DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) program. Jack Lam, City Manager, states eta t[ will cams back to the Council end duoriba the entire program once it la ntablLhsd. Deanne Bowes, Central school District, exprpsed her support of the program. C iiy Council Minutaa January 17, 1990 Page 20 Councilwoman Nright ateted fast everyone should ramembec that this does not cover all of tea School dlairicta, that the financial Saaue will come up around April. MOTION: Moved 6y euquat, sacondW by Nright to approve the MW. Motion carried unsnimouely, <-0-0 (Brown abaant ). a r s r : Mayor Stovt called a racaaa at 12:22 e.m. The mooting reconvened at 12:30 a. m. with all members of Council present (Brown abaant). • ~ ~ « ~ w I1. CON 920EIUfT ION OP RBSO UTION AESTRICTINO AIR TRAFFIC TRAINING PLIGHTS OVER THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMOROA Staft report prsunted by JnCk Lam, CLty Nenager. RESOLUTION NO. 90-041 A RESOLUTION O! TfR CITY COURCIL OP TH6 CITY OP FAACHO CVCAMONVA, CALIlOANIA, A66TAICTIt16 AIA TRAFFIC TRAININV PLIGHTS OyEA TA6 CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONOA MOTION: Moved by Alexander, Seconded Dy euquat to epprova Reaolutl0n No. 90- 041. Mot lore CaYried unanlmoualy, 4-0-1 (Brown abunt). • ~ I2. pj$CVSSION OP DESIGN OPTIONS POR OPERATION OH TNS CENTRAL PARE LI F. MAY, Staff report prauntad by Linde DanLaL, Deputy City Manager. councilwoman Wright asked if thin has to G decided tonight. Jsck Lam, Clty Manager, stated Lt did not, but this L^ only for information because Si had Darn caked to ba placed on the agande. councilman euquat Stated one of the concarna ha is Searing free realdanta ie a County-operated ae oppoaad to a City-operated library. councilwoman Mrlght dated a good quaation to ask la why can't the City gat more of the money they aza anE1E:W to, Jack tam, City Manager, Stated than LS no law dating tact ae era entitled to eny o[ it. Councilwoman Nright felt CM Clty Seeds to apply more preuura to gat more of tea lunch from tM County. ~_ City Council Minutes January 17, 1990 Page 21 Councilman Suqust stated he did no[ want the situation with the County where the "tail was wagging the dog" on the library issue. dory scaranxn qaw oacxgrounc information on the "yrienda of the Library" end stated they teal they are the pressure to the County. He stated what They want to do L to provLds iM beet poumle service to the community. Ma suggested there W a study on county va. City operated libraries. He also stated they have not heard of any increase in funds tc the City for library eervi Cee. we f._.tne. nta~sd he fttw .wo.. 1mAud to bo . ra" increase to help llbrnry services, but that it should be a Clty tax, not a County tax. Ha did not want the County to feel too comfortable with handling the Cenirnl Park Library, that this i• how he thinks they feel. Mayor Stout asked if there waa a timeframe for eetabliehing negot iet ions on the operation portion of thin. Jnek Lam, Clty Mansgar, stated the etfort right now !e trying to develop the "footprint^ to get the grant application in because then is a time limii for that. Me stated once tMt ie completed, then the discussions will bo Lnitiated with the County. He stated the County initiated discussions, but staff told them they needed to dewlop the application for the grant first, to qsi the design procus working, and then deal with the epazation issw. He stated if the tank la to look apecifical ly at dswloping crLNria in a service level for a municipal opera! ion, he suggeetsd a special study W conducted. Hayor 6tmut stated he sNS oariOUS options for library operations that era not listed. Mayor Stout pointed out with ttw name Aancho Cucamonga on the front of our present library, he felt psopla expect the service to W as good ns all of the other services the Ciiy provides. He added the City should check into other eLLy operated libraries and see how they are operated. Diana Williams, 7251 aemthyst, stated covernmsnt Coda Section 19104 states Chat the City would file a notice of Lobo! tc withdraw, telling tae library district that they no longer wen! tc bs part of tae County librnry system. She eddsd the City or library district coultl cease to particlpnte in the benetite of the County-free library end the property situated in the city or library district shall not W liable to razes !or county-frw library purposo. she felt this waa something to eMek into. SM further stated she got tM imprnsion that this au going to M ^ County-operabd l lbrary. Jack Lem, Ciiy Managerr stated that staff's present etforts are to ancourags as much County spending a pooible, to get Aaneho Ncemonga•a share. He added that L! the expsetation is !o do • teaslDility study to develop the levels of service and the coat so tact one can determine what is necnury to do a municipal operation, and to use that information to ull the idea in the City Council Minutes January 1"!; 1990 Page 22 community of providing additional support to do the facility, he did not feel staff could do that et thin time. Re stated at thin point all exaff ie doing Le the promise of the County's spending of add itlonal funds for library services to the maximum. Councilwoman Nright felt much more information vas needed Lo go forward with the new library. Jack Lam, Clty Manager, stated that all of the quastlons that have bean brought up tonlgnt cannot be answered at 'tai. L.a: w .::aa __ _..a :-_.. ___ _ _,....i ore feasibility study which is beyond the scope of the budget andAtime frame that we presently have. Councilwoman Nright asked how w could qst thLS information. Jack Lam, City Manager, suggested that it it is the Council's direction to pursue the feasibility of a municipal library operation, they should consider allocating an amount of money in thL edming yar'• budget to do tae fusibility atuay. councilwoman Nright asked what the time tables were for groundbraekinq, etc. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Mann9er, explained the process, with tae library being completed in shout three !o tour years. Jsck Lam, Ciiy Manager, augqutad tact it a study is to bo pursued it be done shortly after negotiations with tae County to see what tM City's base is to oegin attn. ae etatsc it tie sera to start a municipal opratec liorary toasy, there are no funds to start tats. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, slated there is no action plan to at art negotiations with the County for increased levels o! service regardleee of the Central Park Library, but with Council diraMion ataft can begin doing thl• and at the sear tier study the tone or basis of shat taey era sxpset ing to provide when the new Gntral Park Library la eompleted, and would nsgatiate !or added service now and in [our years what will they provide for tae Central Park Library. Mayor stout felt w• should not commit to the County ss to hoe the library will b• operated. ACTION: Report received and filed. • R e R I3. acTIONt Itas coniLnued to •eDruary 7, 1990 meeting. • 1 • • 1 R r~. '~~.. City Councll Ninutas January 17, 1990 Pnge 23 I4. DPDATf ON 09R Ot RRCYCLRD PILDHR ACTION: Item continued to February 7, 1990 meeting. I5. R9C01001NDATI0N O! APPOINTMRNTS TO TNB NISTORIC P R86I1VATI0N COMNI ION NoxioNr Moved by HuquK, uconded by Alexander to reappoint Rugane Billings, Stave PreKOn and Ada Cooper. Notion carried unanimou alv d-0-]. rnr....q .wg_~..• _ ._,. ~ • ~ Ifi. CONS IDSIUTION OP POBL-IC 91L/R'~'~ COKKI93I0N'_9 PIt ICIPATION IN R NG WITH TH8 UNDRASEDiRIBt (Oral Napae!) Mayor stout stated M put this on the agenda heaeuee M felt it Would M a good idea for the Public Safety Co®lasion to he involved in thin meeting. Councilman 9uguK stated M felt it should M lelt at a Councll level, Dut felt the Commiaslon should M advised of what happened at tM meeting. Mayor Stout euggeKad they M given s notice of the meK ing because ha did not feel they Were aware of Lt, but that tM Council Would have the diecuulon and make the decisions. Councilman Alexander felt the Public safety Co®lssion did know about the ..~ewr.... -a ._ ~ _.._ ______ __ _~_--- ^--........cc..W~.. a..y,.~.. ACTIONS The meeting to only include the City Council. • 1t f R 1i I7. DISC099I0N Ot ALTERNATl OATB9 tOR JOINT CITY W m I lRRTIN^^ 9t off report prevented 6y Duane Ralur, 8r. Administrative Aaefstent, Who euggaaiad wwrnl options for the Council. ACTION: The Connell concurred they weld mast the second Nednssday Tor tM February meeting and that the fourth Nedneeday of very month thsrufier M scheduled. TM Planning Commiaalon mould haw • different date dus to their regular meetinge being scheduled an tM [ourth Nednuday. . . • ~ . ~ IB. 9TRRRT NAMINO - Report on tM etataa o! tM CSty'^ CWCrent etrNt naming policy. ACT10Ne Itw continued to lebruary 7, 1990 mNtlnq. • w City Council Minvtaa January 17, 1990 Paq¢ 24 I9. CONSIDaeaTION O1 eanT OTION a IN6 NORDIC pEV°* p NT COMP Staff report pruentetl Dy Jim Martin, Plen Check Coordinator. Mayor Stoui wggeetad that the latter M •igne and the Aeenlnt{nn; if app-..--~+ conignt, De made availsble to Lha homeowners. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for pu611c input. Addr +eeing the City Council was: __.. 2r ld~^ :m nq a~.a tnn rn,.ar et atwd nhe did not reel = was ~__ keeping their promise as far as getting certain information to the hoeaownara. she added vrork ie still not Deinr; completed as it should. Sha also expressed )ur concerns with the open septic tanks. Councilman euquet stated ha agreed with Me. Nilder•• eoncerne with the problem of the open septic tanks, and felt action should G taken on the Resolution hafora the Council tonight. Rick Goma:, Camunity Dwslopaant Dirsetor, stated hs Dee awi with Senator Aya: a•• office and that they rrould be working with the City on the praDleme It is having with Nordie Dawlopnent. Councilman Buquat stetad the City of Chino Se experiencing eoaa problems with Nordic, and thst Rancho Cucamonga should keep Ln contact with them, AiSOLOTIOM NO. 90-042 w wow:;;'i'1tM O! THE CITY COONCIL OP TEE CITY OP RANCHO COCaMl1a6A, CaLIPOMIa, REQBESTIN6 TNaT M INVESTIOaTION 0! NORDIC DEVLLOPMiNT M PERPORIRD BY THE CONTAACTOA'S STATE LICENS3 EDAiD MOTION: Moved by Buqust, a ..^~,ndti Sy Alexander to epp[ove Reeolut ion 90-042. Motion carried un~9lm:uely 4-0-1, {Brown absent). • • e • w :jy_ ~r"wjjCJ1TI011 O! IT6rY PO1 NeIT MENTINO Jl. Councilman Alex~ndwr aa.ced that a report case Dack on eeta611ehlnq 1Laltatlons of emoting elmea •ni agendas. F • ~ w No communications acre made fras~ .blic. rre ~~. r City Council Minutes January 17, 3990 page 25 MOTION: Moved by Alexanders wconded by BuquN to adjourn to Executive session regarding personnel Luuee and litigation matters, and for Executive Seaeion to _...... _.. «.-. «na _•~-,-~.,. oa loon .:z«~,,,. ~+. th ih~ eh._r iff•s Des>r~:rteant to be herd nt the Rancho Cucamonga INighborhood linter at 6s 30 p.m. Motion carried unanimouelys L-0-1 (B[avm abesat). TM eawting sdjourtNd at 3s63 a.m. Reeoeetfully •ubmittad, Debra J. Adams City clerk Approved: ~• ~S CITY OP RANCBO CDCAMOMGA CITY CODNCIL MINDTBs Adiourned Neetinc An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Nednesday, January 24, 1990, et the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Canter, 9791 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamongn, Californin. The meeting wee oa11W to order at 6:&S p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Pr9eont were Councilmmsbers: Nilliam J. Aluander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Bugset II, Pamaln J. Wright, end Mayor Donnie L. Stout. Also present wore: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Llnde D. Deniele, Deputy City Nanagert Dunne esker, er. Adminietrneive Aeeietant; Patty Riffel, Rxecutive Assistant; Ondsrehariff Dick Nilliams, DapuLy chief Tam Wlckum, San Bernardino County Shsriff'^ Department; Cept. rugsne Citmnro; r.t. an.,.. as na.• v~ w,.n oerv0 ~. r• w, re r..y~.~. o.....w.. ,.. __ _ Sheriff's station; and Debra J. Ademe, city Clerk. t • f • • R Mayor Stout mated this Le an infcrmel meo[inq between the City council and the San Bernardino County sheriff's Department to discuss law enforcement iseuse relating to the city of Rnncho Cucmgnge. Jack Lem, City Manager, stated this meeting has been sahadulsd to aselst in enawaring some of the questions that cams up from the November 29, 19&9 ateeting with the sheriff •e Dspnrtment. f • • f • f ~ 2TlM9 OP DI SCl7SlION el. DIBCVSSION OP SMBRIP-'a D8P aTN6MT um y88 ROTATION POLrr•rva Jack Lam, Clty Manager, introduced the item end referred to hie outline of quutiona for thin itw. Deputy Chief Nickum explained In datnil how the deputies era uaignad. City Connell Minuto January 26, 1990 Page 2 Undareheriff Williams, Sheriff's Department, added there aze no minimum/maximum tenures Eor duties and aeeignmente. Ae further stated that even after the discussions tonight On thin subject, thnt it will take a lot of f•~-~*e...-•-~ -^ gar une oatance tRa City Council needs, but did agree thei the City needs stability. Undareheriff Williams, Sheriff •• Department, continued to expreae to the city Council that nne advantage of having the 9Rerit2'e Department provide law enforcement services ie that if there is a Deputy working in the City of Aancho Cucamonga that they do not npprove of, it ie a lot easier to move that Deputy to another area, 6ecauss they could not do this ae easily with their own Police Department. Jack Lam, City Aanager, asked how we go about resolving this issue to achieve aatiefaction for everyone. Undareheriff Williams, Sheriff •e Department, suggested that we Look at copies of contrecte from other cities that contract for law enforcement services with the Sheriff's Department. Ae added that whatever is established for Rancho Cucanonga would probably De eetabliehed County-wide. Hayor Stout naked if there was a wny to protect tae City from getting a Deputy transferred into Rancho Cucamonga that has had disciplinary problems at other work locations. Undareheriff Wllliema, SReriff's Depaztment, stated we would have to work this into the ool SCV. Councilmen Alexander asked if promotions were the reneon for tranetere. Undareheriff Wil items, Sheriff's Department, etsted they needed to look at promoting people already in Rancho Cucamongn io a higher position. Deputy Chle[ Wickum, sheriff •e Department, stated he d10 not feel it was that bad to have someone promoted out of Rancho Cucamonga beceues of the learning experience they gat frao St. Mayer stout felt ws needed to work on keeping Aanchc Cucamonga perecnnel in Rancho Cucamonga Cor promotions. captain Oilarore, Sheriff •e Department, concurred chat a Deputy does get good eXDnYieaee From Going to other erwaw within thole eyatam. Jack Lam, City Wanager, asked for a time limit to accomplish getting the contrecte lrom the other cities the Sheriff's Department ie involved with. UnderaherlCf Williams, Sheriff's Department, stated that hopefully after June 1990, he would Rsve ^ lot more Input on what Se going to happen after Sheriff Tidwell retiree. We felt a lot of work nwdad to G done Detwsen now and Ju..a Geavw by then there would be a new sheriff end the City's law enforcement study mould probably be completed. City Council Ninutas January 2q, 1990 Page 3 Mayor Stout cuggaeted that the contract modifications be done between now and July before the budget. ~ • ~ • . . 82. DISCUSSION OF DECREB OP DISCRETION CIVRN BY TRR SIffiAIFF'S DEPARTt~ TO TN6 STATION COMMANDER AND T TO I RWItNT L N NPORCR $R4G$AtlB_AND INTEAPAC6 AS A POLICE Clli6y TM ARRwwnTan mD rarer, usona Tart ,__ City Manager, introduced the item, and referred to hie outline of questions for this item. Undereheriff Will lams, 6heriff•a Departmenk, stated that at the present time, they do not get input from the City Manager before a decision ie made, Dut felt they needed to male assurmcss that tae City dose have involvement. Deputy chief Wickum, Sherit!'• Dsparts~ent, explained how the Sheriff Department's disciplinary action policy corks. Mayor Stout asked if Captain Gilmore hoe a personnel file once eoareone comes to Rancho Cucamonga. Captain Gilmore, Sheriff's Department, etatad yea, that the files comae with the ~puty. Mayor stout etatad he did not care how a disciplinary action occurs because he would Gold Jack Lam, City Manager, responsible for whatever happens in the Ciey. Councilwoman Wright stated she felt the Station Caamsnder should hove the authority and zssponsiDility for their employees, end felt he should hewn a any eo in diecipllning his employees. She added she felt Lt was important for the person being disciplined io knoa the Station Commander hoe this authority eo they mould W aaare that they work !or the Commander and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Undereheriff Williams, sheriff's Department, felt the Station Commander needed to Da the authority to start and stop programs. He added they would be doing an aaeeeement of the command level positions. Councilman Buqust stated there needed to bo an understanding o! who has the ultimate decision making for what goes on in lsw enforcement. Nm added he felt the Council needs to have mate input in the decision mekiny efforts at the Rancho Cucamonga station. Councilwoman Brown stated the residents feel the City Council is to W held accountable for what the SMrift'• Department !s doing end stated that sae did not teal tae City Council has tM answersl therefore, they cannot be sccountable to the people. Mayor stout etatad he felt the people of the City vented to hove one place they could go for all City servieaa. City Council Mlnutee January 26, 1990 Pages d Underaheriff Nilliame, Sheriff's Department, said he understood the City'q desire for getting more control. Jnck Lam, City Nanager, stated this discussion also refers to item BS in regards to the Station Commander's authority. • • • ~ • e 83. DISCUSSION OP SHBAIBP'9 DBpAA"RBNT PHILOSOPHY POR A CITY INPUT PROCESS POR $ELECTION OP ADHINISTAATIVE PEASOANeL POR TFDS LOCAL SUBSTATION. Jack Lam, City Nanager, introduced the item and ref erred co hie outline of questions for this item. Underaheriff williame, Sheriff's Department, stated that he did not feel tae city would want to get involved in the selection of some of these people if they have the right Station Conunander making these decisions, but felt there should be a Level of pnrticipstion by the City. Councilman Euquet felt a lot of tae Ciiy'e participaticn has already occurred because of the old City councLl 3ubco®Lttee that had mat with the Sher.tff'e Department. Councilwomen Wright stated that she telt the City has had involvement, i.e., CHOICES, but would like to have more involvement. Deputy Chief Wickum, 5hariff'e Department, stated he felt these meetings needed to take place on a raqular baela. Councilwoman Brown felt Lhe CSYy cAould atltl the Sherif!•• Department on the liar of meetings the City Council hoe scheduled with outaida agencies. She etnted she telt the Sheriff's Department should be n part of the City team, and that it would be better for everyone. Sae etaYed she hoe to feel good about the wrviw tM City gets from tha Sheriff's Department. Underaheriff Nlllieme, Sheriff's Department, felt the Public Safety Comsieaion should also 9K involved in tae dlecusaicne. 86. DISWSSION OP SP4AIPF' 8 nBPAATMaNT POLiCTRA wTTD ARnagn mn Dnatlr Da.aminwA YByIF,~;,ivaAZ aancg of LOCAL Law ENYOncEHaAT PERSONNEL. Seek Lam, City Nanagar, introduced tea item and referred to hie outline of quutione for tae lice. UMereherllf Nillieme, Sharlff•• Department, stated ha did not have a problem with the City gettln~ access to everything that goes on with the eheritf'• Department a long ae Li Se legal for them to have it. City Council Ninutu January 26, 1990 Page 5 Vndereheriff Williams, Sheriff's Department, explained the briefing and trnining that Le given to the Deputies. ea advised about the programs they are involved ~^ ___ .._~__ >.... ..w .cacao ne xnew Cne city m1m not know of these. Councilwoman Wright asked if Clty employees were involved in s certain educational program, would it be poeeiDle for the Sheriff to alto Da a part of this. Undereheriff Williams, Sheriff'^ Department, stated yes, that they are supportive of any City program. Ae added ha felt the Sheriff's Department might have some good programs they would like to share with the CSty. • • . ~ . 85. DIBCDSBIDN OP SRE1tIPP•S DBPaRTNElIT RHCEPTIVITY TrMltwg THE CONSID aTION OF rM t. .aN ENPORCBNvNT IDR>•a PR er, See diecuaelon for item B2. • • • . s B6. DISCOSSION OP CURRENT CONTAaCT - DOEB TBE Re!eT PO r OP THE m er.n wr THE NEEDS OP THE CITY TOD11Y7 J6Ck Lam. City Mangei, introduced the item and referred to hie outline of questions far thin item. Re further asked if there waa agreement to work on the existing contract. Vndereheriff N111 Same. 9hariff'• Department. wfwtwA hw dne. nM h.e. . .net.., with sitting down and taking a look at the contract and working with the city on it. Jnck Lam, City Manager, •tatad ha felt the City staff end Sheriff's etnff should work together on the contract eo thin will bs randy by June 1990. Captain Gilmore, 9heriff'e Department, suggested repreeentativee from the City and the Bhariff •a Department qo to otiur contreci cities and have diecuesione with them on what is covered in their contracts. Dapuiy Chief Nlekum, Sheri[f •• Department, suggested that the Public Safety Commiesiomra also tour their fscilitiee u the City Council hoe done. Councilwomen Brown ntated she felt it a Co®leeionez complained to Captain cllaare, that a written remit should b written with n Copy Bent to Jack Lam, and felt this should 6e ehnred with the Comtsiuions. w . w • w 87. DI$NBBION OP ISBDEB O1 NDTD r. COB r No additional wDieot• were distueeed. • e w • . City Council Minutaa January 2{, 1990 Pages 6 _... _._^~C_t~^.. ___ `we _~~ two .x,611n. • • ~ ~ t . MOTION: Moved by Alexander, aarnndad by groan to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MNtinq adjourned at 9x02 p.m. to the Environmental Management Co®leeion meeting on Januazy 25, 1990 to ba hold at the Llona Park Coamunity canter at 7x00 p.m. Reapactfully submittal, Debra J. 7ldemt City Clark Appzeved: i i' t ' ' ; 9 Ir X A V 1 HObN0000heNebOnoNFO00 N1-oo r J O J M1 r _ n n n'+7^N~h ~JaJi.r f'.~T.„rv+VruPmrP N N P N n H w N N N • 9 A 211 7 • h n /~ •~ JNNtlM1 f PhOwNnaNOhOPO H•IN OhfPOnNIIrNrMmP OH NnaNOhmPOnNNr ii Nnnnnnna.daaa+aNNNNNNNNNNaaa afaacaar~hr.l-w opppomeoboeoemecebbpoemb :1'-i-la-¢b°eoe'ec.°..°r ~.°•°.°w~°w~~~°.•°.r-°..°r.°r°rH..N..Hn.......r..HH..r....IH.rr..HH.. rYnn•a aaaa.araaaaaaaaas ar.rar•r•.araaaaarar.a••••r•r ' + 1 If if lfl •I f ff s • . wf L ~ i , ,r uip z~ a r y. P ~2 <\ iOH o ) n n Nd UL Jf a • •I O])N < f f 00 J O f Wf>HILL2 \O ~ ~ V Y.L OOH w O O tlOWNm i V rPi Jl i •n \M P\ O V V VILV W <LLLNN V V fJOLLN NV o OrwVGOWp Of;9 YJLL J iJ ¢Nh J N ~ NO u¢ \ \ W O;U\Y<WLL f pU ~ffN NL W20 ON ONWw ~O wW rV• WYf wON¢WliwwiJ W AO < OU V w NIU 7 iNw<H«LL'n fr] S _ - N N Z \ \ - NOtf ~ffY W seal- iJ NPZ ¢~ S~NVWrLUJOV JN pf :x zJU U¢ itPOP Znmz OJ H~JM ILf LLNw 'J w7 Y LL ? w Nl wwwwN Odrt66LLLLYN 06f F_ _> JW OJ h RV <LL ~Nr•>NV> YJL NZHW ohGHMOwaHJru ).Y»<WYJ ~Jn O n f 'fr) U VU~w o2VL •~2 ZNf wN NwuwNUNNaVNJ Zmw ~ wf2 Zh f YNW W i1NNU6 N;JY INhJHF•N a~-i z V V ONV fLL~00<Wtl > W S JYVVPSV~u ~V<buiH OOJw ~rJ<JZltl00¢fu<f wwtl V Y¢u ¢ Z 6SUJ22Vh 1V WY Yr+2w¢FM1¢¢r.6'n Y b C uZVOVZVy 00 I nJ'JHZN ¢JwHNhVF1FFih hNZH~ uYrr LLLL Lry.u uw J'~ZwT2r-•LL FS•+220n{. > } } OSww rcZ L ¢ aLLgYU rt'¢V6N p a'WLLJwWWf 3Ii>tl~r urrt Vf}7w•un Y006.7Z ZNOYON¢¢Y Cp{pfN>yUJh¢JUZVUU;V•O V r Z FZ S V iH1 a 2 Ln 6 J A O VJ U Ow~ ; Wi H ZV NWUZNO L r1 6 it '~~hVYi of i6 pN.Y>N H z Va i 2 J__ LLZ• ~ Z •J••ni s w n 0 w o[ S ~ o i O UVanu ON J „ pLL = ~ V ¢J . Sw O WW pNUUh2i JV Lr[i'JZV7z•[Hh ~ f hN2 ~<YZM NMUai 2Z> 3 Y LLF YWf ~ Z M ;fMhtF O7i< 2 i > N t Jfff}N ~ NJ !<O Ww> WWMIONZ;W26<H YL OJ Z fV<; rt2i O;ffVWpZJ2W NO'J<t6\O t J O f0)W000 M V WfZZVY ~J• Y<N O7JWOJJH V9L;WMWKNYFy LLILV OUJOf UY6W00 Of)W ].J YN if 2 p H fNf 2 C[ S 911i2'IN hW LLWW>iY'JWi• f ;Of M II ry W O Z ¢wh L~QwVW U M1 V 6 N O WOUr •t i¢Zi;OhhfO OM <.Y WItFOU ~ViWNf<f <f V~ N h2 V X ~. i W W f 2fOWYf ii •Ff0 OSY.UVY NMN Y~ Y I> MW l\ O XWY V V _ R f rM1+~1F roO2NM p y1 u y p fWWOWJWW Wfff LOOiNJWJ~lWF~R •i• 2 Of FfMii>ZW NVhO.IW SfNhWWWUNNfMMf J2f NM 2f NNf _ i 9 J 1 l < t f O uHlffffJ J N NLfi9NNlJf •~OfYVMJJiLf f,NNY fffff<dWWNMi «f««<f \f ffffffff OfVOOf00000 1 Y f Y N T O fNaN0001N~N NOdPnONTNFONff OPMO10hNMTOMONfN 1011 N N P T rrOgNNOONYN Nd NM NrrI.]NPwONNONO•I NOTOONdON MOX • !II .f n T N N M ny ~yPIN Yyr TT OTTN r N NON09 ~rTw Py P~1 n11r1 fr1T.] ul w1 nM rr11rIH ww •yul ~> X r l / Op OnNOOOdopONiNPVOnO0im0 nV~puap OLN danNN gx~NN wC'nH6 Nm NOp np \ x f ni./n ryP..r nN iVm mm N •T'M1NN nN \'r¢N mn n N Nm n n 2x 'JX 0. vx0• giNdngPOrnTVNNhmp OrONTiN dMgPOnNTINNnme,O nNTIN M1rwgmm0gmpm¢gPPpPPOPPPPg000000000nnnnnnnnrrrnrvNNNN OuuViiVVVUYiiiaVUVUV11 ViYViVVaViVVVVi 1ia111i111VJV11 l/ x)• { V • / !\ • a • • •• i d U w J7 Y< lV iU Z N ~ pw wv ON'fLY U O ZLL S i V¢ O T q O N U T WMNJ Ly d n PO N UL u \2 N ~iW Sap w nfu nN N LLv y.i ~ v rhny tiur wy.lF fU W rp w n JWJ i Ln ¢N Ox2i 3 l3 a\ ZLLNLg210N N Y N{JMW y, fn 2 lZw tl Wii YVO 6WW¢W• i2NVOZppJNN YYYf< N 9¢tl nOJN CEO wpJ NWq p3J iJpV J NJ J OZ Np :z: apNhi2e0 Ifs ___ _ __ GNri z pa J>m wpVp~ hNWILJ OY~N 7IiWJw,i'ILL pWr~6 LL n'JN •Ngn26pN ZFN• ><yFyOnZp Nni~ S 06'~iWW>RwWOJM1w LLw f} W>V Ox2x6wM1NWCwNNNdi~ NFwO Owyuf2umwuuNNNVNZ6waJZpV6p¢~u21v NOZZ Oil n2 n ¢pUWni~ O ~2O~OZ¢v ¢1<M1U >Oifo lI-r Of FNJ N SJ<NILLHN qvn n 'u{ SV wiO ~>2arWZJUp ZVnJW 42wCOwf JV La Ff wN <I wfnNOwQViwwp ~ u NSnM if rpfGM1nNUM1'O OeM1 rc¢SSUVVOM1V2nr-V IVN~vOVFO aZI-~Fo Min n~zx-z witl unz o.~n zrnn2M1wl-+,NWNnanorznnn ~zf a r.. r, s-..z>pJYnw N..Y Y..~tl mz J.<+i-in.2.'o nw n..,>w' ri ~'%.i~:~n W w.mugtoo pnLL z»f www ~l N wuo:~i.°~~xrY wnino>:w,.Nxyfw:opousp¢¢z..na:.nnxrii ~fYoiiaio> l ~ /r V 2 Y S YF E .~ u ~. O N ~ J ury O _ ti n vZr+ J uVw NS V Of{UOONO nL F N S 2 a O ZNWS nJZ p y O S r WWNONOVn> > v0 JZ:iO i t ZiV V fNW wlLL V ¢O¢fW J2Z NU ON ON2 ¢i ZF M1JwJF¢ •L nZ 2vNV J¢nr NYl SW OV Vf OV 1tl~Y W N /OOw N N ¢rF q'>V JaFNNOJU U6tltlNi {O>Z2M1iFJ>SONY n n LLMN¢SWYJ SM<tlN Jrf Ota M1yNMNW MNW NNOtY uO .Ji2 N Y W JSFpf ~J wv000700hf iyla iy 9 NW •r 6WYJi¢WLL OKwO<_ x Y T .JVOJO 6i it Jis LwJJSSCrOx N YM1( NMNJ<MYWO{MJ> WUu X • A• J W2if iW<O N¢. OOF Ni WS{aa0a0 fGY OZJ \pZJJi x x :y O. iVfO OF O1Y09 x[KiN>OOONO iYSiiYO SYM1Ya WW6~afW VWOS yWO itlM1yiaatlJMNUYOaYM1NWMZwN<NN ~ O00 XSx JOON>ON¢JOMMZ W>/FrNOYYyM>iFVaO1N N>YLMONi Orxf i{YM1ZIOOJ T00000¢Naf{aOWLtMMJOZ 9'Ja{WYYtl JffiNNf Y'YN MMr[OO fWJJJO ppON090PVYY000U'JUVUWUUOOOOOpOWWWWW WILY YLLLLYLLL AVOVVJ't) x¢X N~mOM gI`r4NNNMdggTTiyONP'ON gIVM1gONTT IgTO,TNgVN.dNNgNNPPd xOx gOTTTgnppT~~TJqNnM1Np¢¢pqmdO Nry dNNWNhNNn N/POr.1¢NON.aN TT xW• ^n TT N NT fT Yr/ N f~N OT yNNT~NNrxOMnVyn~NnT MrmY JwTI ~>X x ~~ PPramoryamappeoaeeepu memoaopNNhpprynaae PI-11 •i• aaOh000NNJ 1NONPbNmmN0000NO000TNNOaOhOONmrooohmmn a a p P a m \Y PJNPN Ow l woNN a Oa V N rNhNa ar• rMM mr r m n ~ .. n NM nT+ N •O• prNmaNahmPOnrvnaNNF OTpNNnaNah mPprNTaNNhmP O.•ryTaNa •i• aaalaVaNNNNNNNM NNaa-0<aaaa aahhhYhPh +oY rNrrnf.Nwrrrrrrrr iiiiiiii iiii ii +¢• viiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i i i v _ N ah 2 a N Jw OW 'J¢W r2 M L V W O O h Fw a <pN W i _ e _ Y J V W ~ W ¢ Vi O O a 2 NV ¢ a 2 SaaaN w>n f P V O_Vy Om n Ofra< JWmu00 NP r ~N\ < VFewF ~ ~W WJ fW ;r¢ Sm LLhV Ju V <M NN U O tw P>LiNWt WJ Z Ni iN iY< YFi pOVW ~ V6\ N W NSYYWJ6 UN O NO ZN NJ2WRW W F w Wi r Y ~ ¢ _ 1 W O u Y MJ < W2Mw w N•Wi W IY SWLLP<W6 YY11~~11 NM<fU2VL<NOM hMS FUwhw w ¢V S) V 2NJ•JaJUWiO~ VyT>1N JJ~YUNW<J1[ hw Y IZ 1 < m~ L06<WSI fi.ON t0¢FW >owwp mNYI h _ VILO~ wOSG¢¢~J sW~ r~¢MW JLL3WWR¢MO• N jl W Zii 2<F N9YON0 ¢>SNOm U00 N 'Vj w U1VW~ wLL¢Y2 NY. S>ZWI'JU LLy iu¢w LS LLSO VNO NN >J Oa JhWUL MY[NM1> hW¢WFMw2 Jiwr cJU SWNF w.Jf ruS¢SU2~f¢WUw~iN VSwZO Nr aEU>¢ wfR hx>ih20iw Tf ui ¢Vhi J<SZWJ~020 x ¢ eLL><ifimf a2u92J h ¢Z<i a 0 Vi~1-U N h~Yw J2FV>i¢N hV LLlhi<wh2>iw NVOmo22FmSN2 1'~jf Jw< wh2WaOVY wiFf N+~ur U rt J J u UJOh6r<UhY w hhpwl F ahVOUV m n+'1-JP FZOhwOhuh2r¢¢SOwNY JOhihJ6i2¢hJ926~au<S2 rN,27 N S LSrT¢i rSrn F.+.~Z LJUUO aOwf ru9ado Jul Vw T•xw><fYwrNS WOwO¢ONfaOw~~V 66 C2 p o UZSrJFVOVVOIarLrtOihY>O\pV¢VNVriOheOin laNbi¢x 2 ¢U VJ I~ FS SO ~+U V 2 P 3 ~ W • JS O u S O J S O ~ ¢ O¢ f2 N Z O J% PW O _ ~. - 2J x 1~ e SOJ Ni OS NJr 2U r y wy NSO WV<J N Z< h ue U SJY 04w N N I 'J f_SW •Oe i t6 Ww J YJ W J7UN>wK2 W NNnTNNAIIO TTNTNNPTan1!<PATPNaaMO PrOI~PPNOONaaNeYAN~r T P.p Ar+N TOTO Ta1P NOa-0mTP r•IIPnRIPN N¢PNNNNaNrTTrrON MOaw T.I /Iw T T TNTTrNN T N TNMT~r AT rl n r Tn rT 3 u: mPNaeaoNOnomammNaNOeermraN n.aeoNNrooomm m °o mmm' ° nzi naa..e meaaPNO~Nmm~nnNNrmmrrNme<NmmNn o.~m r e a. a P n.Ir mmvN ONNPNP 0armrN NM1mrJNa P.OroenPOnrp F hrvwrm W F _ = l °mNN NN+m..Nmne,..N'y.n ° m wm ' `~ aN m NmN N ~ a ra c f J N \~¢rv w w0 Nr.r N .• .. < n aNN m x)X io: .nNmanfrmPC-.Nn<nal-mae.+Nmamahawe.~NmaNNr rm nYn mP Pj^p pPp0000000poryMrwNNNNrrrNNnNnrN•rvNNNN ea: oo>iiiiiiii+iii+iiiiiiiiii+iiii+iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii . . . . + W f K NJ N H i i ° o" cu H N mN O Y m { P ON w r a YN r7 xf 9 \ ~ O ni ti ~ m O N \ J lm j r i 1 0 0 ° wai ' o.c ' ~ M i °¢.Li ions ~ Qa` r V m hJ ~ °' ° il` iai° i ~ ¢ mwo N oe V M1 r0> ` ~ ¢r OSNN W V O OP Y \ e \ Z W W 1NW 6s N1 MxY JN J IO WS Wx (OOOON ?Z w ~Ny WI II Y ±J a<O . y~y y ~ ~ r rW i O O iW l • eSn O LLu w»iiMW ;r iho N JO nl J` 6f••n efeOrr~ r~ r WxOW Nf <rff> ^~`f 6 j0 1 {N~r YIIIIV a4WWOVNNNWG F.h O^NWpN a~nm NP> VZ wNt~l ~f0 rw wu > VF =NIY LL NM{n 0 NYY J wf 0. Z J61Z7 rnN _ .22 I¢ Om~rJNNry NV UrOi~ttJ2h n w t f l u < Nr~UUim 2 <w NV¢U02{ l w VW 6 UZ> W OwYx22wpwm Z+.20 wiLZLL Lf NYOLN r2o0<OmhYNi uZ a rcwm f{.+YrNOr Y¢ZNO aanmZl wo ww iV 2 N m rr < V ww mwYh2Wr02oJ22Y 1 NWYS¢f FN l S x IrWay war OOSO¢¢J.uw>JnN Zhr«rY¢ OfJJ WFJNZ JMI .~ r J i j uZw~Vrr 4¢ w¢pOV r y uNa Om2hWYa aaaJ•+xWZwuuYV» ¢I _ rr n ^ HnYZ6r~mj{SYLL~•Immn m J~J=N=Y n uwOwi JU Y ~S ~ J F ww ~ 2r +~ 4 i ¢OW J is i Y a S w 0 J i YNNNN•n0 Oav 2¢LLOr m9 SYUVrn OVxmVNO»i >. iY»O. •IN ~YmC6 7~7J YJY ~ O JJJJ w Z V _ rl rr NNH > r V ¢ ~ u ui V ~ _ _ ___ V V N { VYNN u N rc 7l :JJ "3 ~• h N Z ~1 •1 I IL2N rY O N¢•n Y NNJ LL6¢ fJ0 SV ¢ »iVUY>SSi Z~~iti NON p> N • rl VFNf r'J Jf jjWOWw fOOpOMW 00 { w > w VrONNJU 7•. NNNNPN{ Y7 JM ONV2 OJ w ¢JJMMwO~ rJ0 NN9JL W JZVV WNNMNWJh N9 J Y O V n n 7 L9f .W>{OWF OJ0000 f• { N„sWW ~a N~0¢rS J WNW a M X • h J~ LL jhih¢J xJW JLZO W{tlWx hV .r WWWW .V ON ¢pU WNUN VYNI O {IOVi9hMOWWhf40 ~• Y. NLi N J9 YN ~ rl ~ iJW W6{NU JNSON OV{M xCf .tpYWNLLIIWWNjihVOWi MN JOTW NLNUV .O N C G hOL V 3V NY LW N a N{W4 W N W> N N JW M M O 2 •WJW OJO{ U O N UN ..N WOWJJJ JfWWJ ~jh YI4NN 11 X JWNNgO 6NNWZrVJOZWW¢OZ O.O WV N1y L\{\fU2jY¢W O {spWW {i WNWj{f Ojh VVN VVVU hh6U>• ~~ifOW f NW S O W •iY h J DV i>OV Vh WNWWUMjiOinO.ILiW90h>V 011iN0 09{WWiJUJOOVf n L N S pO 6 ±2; GLLWWW~LL6660 NNNNNNNNFrYFV ZZj O tlWtl jtl x¢NVIN NNNNNNN X tl ~ n O I njhhPNNnNN01.1 yf rNP•ONJW On10 iNYr yNNONNNNNNPMNaiPnMrNPT• O NOONNPO VNN NNONa Nf NNNTNO M!•..a NPAaAl.l al YlaNPNNNh MU.N NONM ~ •OM W~ ~ mPNPTNPP Pf mp^tlNNM NOmNN{wl m •p IJa-IAm•.1•.IPaNYyI.IgN OP r.l N xI Nr.M MM PN NY N NNN r.IN N•YN T I ~ •>I ~ nppmppVNpWm...prppTT NpVPhrpChprN MYNrw•vWOOrwmJNNOOp ra rldtlr NY NNP N.I NNN~T Y ~ N m0 . Y Y• OA Y~ aX prN T.IN NwOP Or.NTNN.ph W POwN C/'NV n^TTmnmmTTY Y.IY I.IN NYIN NN •1•IN~IV IYIVNaPYN••f Y~I ~IYi I•I R H 2 V2 _ 620f Rm NpFP W p0 OT O U• WV¢ F f .in ~Waiz N ~ ° i N > ~~ nail"- aJ i r s o r- j~n .. r ivf YIW St S UW i V R S>JJ frc f IyVNa a NsfNm iWW f M + : L2f NS lfM6 OS Nf2tl uOV WiOSJ V ~ z zrlNUf 1 O vWJifVf.NwN2YN O If O X 7FM tlf~O1SOf 00> u20 OR F•wNJiWLLNY W f t>O S'Jw wi O Y•LLN i Jf Y _ _ { 1 ~LS3 6FW~-~ WW ZFFOt O {FwFJJY i•Yv V J '~2lJwMNf LLUr6vNZJ f OS~JYW<02~wOwYOV~ tl ui J2G\04~1vLL o YLapmrcrc<PrciJ¢~C•/~~>OWi06a 00 U ~ 2N 2 l ff p f iV N wL Vt LL _ O F>O O NCV! ~ J JJVMWW fOVw ~Z LLV N r JWY NVYS Zr iVV JVO >'/IJV YOOMH J\ tlOSY U6 JFJ>rJNiJYMiYWf1+1. ' i v0> ~-OVVf NWIOH 9¢ f w ~ii r.i.o a oo>\ i2 ~a.W fC\tl n _ yy NM•WiV>Y'J VDO ~VSW FI~N'fNOr F<O• Si0 \JNNUf o[W Y6 Y O LLC n1~nN2 .i S2WJY\f WifO v\S OYti\N WV ~ W OOtl2YOW ~Yf VN MIV tlMf 9i ~ WWWSOfrOW W WYONY ~ZNFh>JJ ONNh SfrFFFFMJIIO ~t~ YJJSNWiVRh\NNNNrJJ6 X511 W 1~i Zi\\f f~NYVfffWWWWLN OW Ff FJJ'J 7>Y»»>itif iif if it •MNTwfNI`TNNTTrhwmOtP ~O• ONE NONh\Nff OONNWNrT O•IpOPO •O• YYT Tf N;\TTTOTWNNTWTPJm N ~1 N T TTnNT TwMN ~W~ > • • 3 r i ;; N, . :• ;E .., ur i ~ e m o0 o eeo opoo aooeTOepren•eprNleoe•nonloNw a ~ °aeo a eno epee aa~no~nooNaennewa.raneonoewowa e or M wOT • •IN MMN as rnln NF~.a10•anFN•aF=MwP NTTaO PN aN • N \ • N • J II _f 11 .y N n w T O A n 2• n w r\ ~• i nor f w N A A °.~• s .~••• wrww~•wrr ~NneweF<rNnaF.NnanaFMONn•Nfh<weNNnINeF.PernT•Nal.eme rzr ¢aFh/e~„1•aa•wwwwwwwweeeeeeeoorrrrrrrrrNNNnr.InNNNN Nn NNNnnNwwwnnFFe/ee.ee<u<..wfee.f «r<..fu. >NPPP OOOOOOOOGOOOOOOOOOpOOOpOO0000eb0000000 OTTTTT•a1•V•ea11•IIIIIIIIaaaaa1a11•aJlaalaa•11111111 1fr 1 1 1 1 I I I I O L a0 f L a O \ J T N U a n P n W i a• W N O. N N nL1 . i n m < O° 0 f ¢ o ~ O• • T Ia • a V 1. .1 • o o '" i ° U n < 0 0 W h i 4 Y nV 1 11 J h L r V _ •= VUV VN VPVZV V> V V V 6 iV r ~ W1~ W N O SNP 11 wV.VtV v ¢ V VE ¢6V ¢ F J .r ~~w f F N O Oii ~ 0 I1 r M O. Ni W O O \h r \! G N 0w ~ 11 y y ~ Y1 y \ f ti OM • t \ W OW WWN L WOW iWUWWyLY fW~ Of0 Si ~ • W • = r fe 7 NVN•U YpNTV `f~WULIWN W J r L \ VWL i ¢WJ JifNi LZpJLf ~ .. __ f ONfUaiW L O iyp _ _+w. b L Y 0 10Y rM• - i 1 -yNV Ji iN~FL LJ N h ~ ~ > W ~h2 J Wi1L iy1 WFW <i NOIU y K ~N 0 1 • L W OWY :O r OL'J NNJ NN Or. Nfh hihY>ON N V hrc LLNW 6r Nr [1 O L (JO i9 u10i jrMZWh„N Jiff „W„tiL Z¢6 M h i iN OOVM WNµgNf WVMWJ fWWW JWa WL pjL ei• r y 4 FF L Y~~ Jf -RM Onh Z iJMLJi V O ~ yrt6Z°Nf iwUt ° ~ ~V 11 N 11 w = 1 J N V t a W W LL Li i e f.~f UU Y Y O ile ZhhtMIf I~Z M Z ¢ i w ~ ~ LL rWr •O^ W Z S 1[ J W W W F iW iWOWZVNiJ i V U O V Mie f ZOi Wh WJOOJ>¢JOWiJW Of JGJ Of NWMOWpWJ U rW• L Z OOW LLN• 00 N hVEYYwWViMLVJZ JV VFt<hLEhZ~y p O LL O Nih NFL JVN ZN99NW<N92WNF9Z MfN hOi Ji'J Nh j IZ W~ NW° W f 0 N O ~ w ~ u ~ 090 iZ>W i W Wf W4w1 .IW>WJO <f MWfWI yW Y ¢ 009 WnU WNf Z>i/>Ni>¢iN>O¢L>e>OUf jO¢E6h¢ r N i J NO y r w u uo ~ re°f 1il ¢ NFU ~ ~ ~ n Y 9 N9N • ( JaJ i 0 l F U 0Y r N¢.'a 0 y1 W l I N RN C UN6 F N y r W h i S ' r _ h0 IS NY N ri ~ ¢ Z s NOS = WY r• ~ N W J • ~ Ma W L Z U U U N i> i y W: a. M M 2 N r ~ o „ EW9 f(7 N Y F Yi M .W IN M r 4y~„NI 1ry ° D ° N i i M n i J F Nw Z i h >OFNM~W Y=Zjep~rYf W10j UO ¢ J Of J JM¢ N¢YF 1 ~ .Vf 4UWNMaJOY9LOf e Vw F U 6J L 1"Y1h N: NfV 09 Mf 1[p ViiW C 1-1 Y F ~ L K haL <N ~NM f W ra V N)OMON WNO iW F i L OOi 4NL0 MZW >i LVie<WW>Nj 9 __ MY > p L> i N O Off FM NOW¢W9jUNfJ O 4 ~ C f i N fW i ONON ~ • : l WI 11 _ f U tWaff MIIV «Fia9 LO V Y W 0 WO E Jh <i Nj OVVf < F iLW N Oj N f1 • V PWr w _ p J p y~ p r ~ p y y1 N N • p f{rM 0 eJ~ ~lY WN{~~ SIMEO Y9 N YWf~ 0 ill r rf pO 000 f L.Y 4 e F 9 LfN ~ hJJ VWLe JFtUNJWW<VisfLNNENNt:NVjNtf> N • O OWS ` Mi <NW i OJJJiii Zf4jNNNMi (WNJJO _ ` O L L N J9 OM 1Nrf< f(f ffffffaff.eff e0000«O«1 r r r :Or e V . NNP N NNa Tal11M nN I1p NINNN.ryO•T ewNNanPT.•wNh. • P P r Prr .T! OaeO .INTNT.TM NN TTT• NNNNO.O N IV n T ~nP T n~ NNNN T ry 1 y N wN wTN T0 NH 1 H r W ~ T T 01 rIT n 111 TT II 1 IpNT •>• tNP fh\ ~fN VYy =moo LLHW FJ N LL ,. F n~ u1iN OONONOOOOOPOIOOPpVPNMNjINONNNONNYVONOOOONOhO00NF0 NAPaOV Nw100A00TOhmOna01NNPON'OO NNIwaOPVw~wOeripNf ONYNN wMVmrOnlO ~ InNNn4NOONNI Nw10PN aNNhhNnnNw T N nPlnnw hM OrvNnrv~ mMONw N ONNw M NNn M ~• O~i• N•Y• \~{• 6 wNNf NIhOPOMNNaNOhoPewNNa N~Chl POwNNaNOhlC~ONNNINIhOPOn Y[mPmmPmmmPaaaaaaaaal NN NNNN NN NNOVaVV<VOVpNhh hhMhMNN00 iteno°OOeeeoeo°eoeoNpe°noleeeeeo°eeeoovle°e°pp°Oeleeee0ee°eweeeeoeeep° oaalaaaaaaaaaH111+a arrallaaf111a+aaalaaaa+alala+aaa V ! \! • ! ! • WN 1N. •N N V ZV ~ W P J V N • i w i n h• N\ O • Wf> V • V\ T On M1pO[ N N U w N9 N N Y hiw !M VO O M NM _V NI ~ ! OWV _ NY W CN ~N O • IF FW WIPNV h h NOO WY W 6N 1\ Y F IV i NZ\Z i PS Z M if UU Y h0 Wi SNn O i OVW M N i WJ W yYif wl MaWM O M ~J J JH J W ONN i O O JNJ O YYPONSt! W »w f W W ~ W : ~O ~ NO OJ~4 OVf NN1Y•\MOfNN N VOU Vu V i • Nn uni IL Pf JIJ Z NiNMWUO NN2 V_ fiZ JZ i =9m a ONiY=~ VI V \NZ~Ot i N NOYW J 'S fJGSZJO~ P! ! wlO•OM WMYO~NJh iIOL!•Sh!•C HOM1Y O JaMWMYNhJW Oi JONON O w~ i S Wh N V Z n '~ _ _ 40Y V hZ _ NN> i N W l WWN bh p Y a J• wt Jl JO NN o WO= wN h S i„ N N J Z 00 u hpp V N •O O a ' Vw O fSlSi - OUV hiJ V Ni w N Y JZ lY Yi JNV OIh ULL O \OMl iLLNWO OhMwM L S YN l ShHh iSG OLLrOdO W~hW u iliYY Z6 wJf N i Y J S yNTIIN TIYIP IIN PNIMINhA00~IMNIOPONh1a1P NN OONOhhmNNNThNpV~p ~NNN yN PNINPN IIVO.eN~y~y fPNHNwa~nNNONhNN NN1~^mN NON P PI1 N Pwl1 N A NAlll Nn NM1wn JN mNm NNI~1 7 ~ ~ I II IIWI •Y• Il f_• ~ ~ • II •O~ I10~ Ili• •WII :P~ IooeeemeeeemolROmoeeeegmwoomoe..asNweaaeaem oeanoe•.ee weeoeewaeeeaemwewaoeooNanoggooNl.m«mmnwaoomeew¢er-n¢q YieeeoNao~n:i ~m„~Namoeaenol+eeew.•iriueh Y~~o~~rieoooemom.: PNNNm•• vHn N~ryne0alaa~N OM1wme VM1FlOVImti NOmnwIH NP Vwb T N N m NOM1M1m Nat nwONmnONNM n a ~ f JN wN P ~w N~ • ~ Y iY oY s ¢Y • Hw h J N a m 2 ggPPPPPPPPPM0000p0000•••1N N••n Wgm wwNNNNNNN gmq ryry Nmm~ Y Y WmmmMeRwmmnRM gggPP OPP POIwlwgggwqPPPpPqpqR ppgwPPgp Y ~i )¢OOOOOOOOOOpO00 p00000pO00000000DO000000000000000000 OI If 1V11if 11111f 1111111111111111111 <I IIIIVIf IIII If 11 Y Y _ y qq ! m qqm mm q ¢ J U=\ m ~ e N P M • S ¢ i1mJ0 a N J< VOO HAD V A 7V ~ n I j : h N PP U T f Y yV ••m\Nn mmi O Om N w A w O q Y \ P WUWIIIOI I'J P O m N Y O IYIM1 q ry • .I V n 2 II ` ~w aN N ~¢ NM •WI =WNNOMY mP On • ¢ W y WMPMm mji Ml = m0 P N ¢ iNP ; W i FV4N0 i O i WNyW~ O F _± Y • Yh O Z _O NOOW/ V !yZ UVY. h:¢ FY N FJ o N U O N Y J¢hi W N [ WJ W O n :W6 9W Y JJ Mj il l f7 V¢ Kw 11 Y y ¢ YIIy p y y JOWW • INfp¢Y¢ f'j<J YOi H••N i¢WZZW••f W iv ~N ¢J Y : Ww f¢ V V6G J •\W u VYZ O•q N<NNNN f••wYNM VOWW L7V Si P _ __ ~ l~ i H= wy~u¢w Njw! 'I iezDD ~u • i•:J aY iPN n 1 U l V ~ % ¢S i Yh M ZNhO JW I V y Z~ 1 WNV YJ F~ ~Ow • i 1•IO N I W OOWW O LL Nil w6 N N p =YWIW 0 LLNw MF• YX~ )GZi 9V gyNYiNWM NM1 D¢NMO2 0 2•hlgfflNOOiwhIW2YM Wh OfaiWJROJFwWZ2<f hLL JjYYhY)iiMiiWhhY~M Nlijy<~WL>N!m ZeW Y ON4 Ym• . NYN¢YQSJ OSNWpU SMi2N~u< YSS¢J{ b FW w0 )~ J •UY :0 : ¢4¢_¢ _y m¢ IJLL I YW¢WW 21-Y SWUf Lo ~ YwIY1 = » _ 1 2<IIYY I„WIf W<OYLLhz IjiwjzF 2 `Y `iv ¢ MO• YYN V ~ GM) SOV )F hL!>YY•WWWZ W Y Y. a Wmh f M1 YO• W~ O~•N SJ q2.O O N61<fMO f<f «•W JZZ Wf<N¢JJFNq iJW< V Y N2NNWWwW¢YJJYJM1SD Y6~NZ\G >)¢NN UyLLY>•OOYf9NOOYN<YOW ~w~ :LLpGytlpZlDL2 NLL¢m<OYK1i WlOM1 9uiRW Uw i~W2 ~•z.IW W¢ySif pyMMw N2Fy Yv~ Na00jhNSV¢Wi6DY OL 0¢YOOKWOOOOVO<)W~i00S))~YCy~YIIOC Yp6 Y Y N Y ~ M " N F y W r o r wi Y n Y M 2 K w Y N U O!V II Y ~ U P IIO.7 O V w Y O W w G Y ` LL JU W02 i V I.jS iW0 O Si y<V< O W tl ' u Y UM n v •, •1 ~ i Y N j • S y LL2 Y hW w < S 1 • N QaVO •V Om ¢ MmV iN J F R VYN Y • • V UWS < WF VJ iN J VYi ••W 10 W WW WNN O O•<• NO P N N¢<• _ OJWVm 2w j h•. IL J'lz p m'O NNPhNGJOmpN.w N10r•N Nh111N NNaNNPP -0FPOHOmmpPMOOgFaNN00 M •fP1AhNONNa1PNPMFPI ryryIINnNNh000ilpN N~•w PNI P•1 YNa 0•• hFm mN T~N•1 N1nN•101•ImI ww mYl~mR ~PImT T••T OnO.OINpIN R••mN nmrrRiln T ~~ uLN w Oa0 VS SWo YNW !-J E: . Y ., Y Y nll OY wi OOOONtlOnpO000NNOONOOhO+TOOIIO dNerOOtlNOndOeaNerve ONN o000HOMTO+00w000000POOwOrmOOTOOhN+NOwmOONOO+aOwOOPO >Yf~ NInP OPANaOm+N„„TNtlTOtlbwdOTen~O roN q.p ipN TOO i'.NONma nn wN5 00 Pn HHnwNPMrya00Nhw~~NPN+NONN hNNeNN NN+wr NY ~• O tl~NelaNh O NN rnN NNamN w ~YY H .. N d N Twwa Ya• ~ w.. w ~Y all OY 2Y ~• O YpY Jmr NrhOPOHNT+NdnOPOMNN aN tlhmPOHNTaNOMOP01NTaNrhOPOwNT YSY 6TnTTIITTaaaa+++a++NNNNNONNNN+OrrdOarOOn hhhYhhhhhmOOm W Pwq PmwwPgggPPPwPqqwPPP rowgPPPwgPwgPPPqqqNPPPPPwPPP seeeoeoeooooaooeeeeeeoooeooeoeeeooeeoeeeeeeeeeeeooee pH a+arrraaaaaeaaraa++aaa+raraaaaa++ararrara•Haaaaa ii 2+ Y f V m fwm m • • m imf Yom f i Ji f m o ~ • V i Ji ~ f Y M Y a O w O Vh hY _~ f_ N P J NT '1i w a N N i U DZ N eH _TN h W M Il N+ U f V'J W 2 V • t mN i Y ~ wF ~ Vf2 \UN Yw h V_J A J YW _W Ytl > YrM dN0 J3 On M1V N U Y NM1 M V WY` OJi S 2 ww JOM WJ1 rN NM > J N2VWI.t2h \ a OM1M iN ~J N WO Y M 7 N Y ~ 2 OSNVOOaWN ~V +W W W .wOW7 ~o w 1-f VWpI O +if Yf NVFiwp• JJJO fJ OFJOJp2TVWrvf+in ~~ Hn~~ •S~ n+r n .max n. ~___~ _ ~.. swm__OFffOWmC rf Of YNW NM I S wp +~ a: ~Y°iJ w___ NVW Y Y h• JV J Y O S S• J VS O> Ja ~V OY MR pZ SK W J N J J W rNOTwVwPONNNNONT MNdwdNNhNhf PdTanNi OT wmPmgdNPwOtlwhN V OwwNPaHd mrYhHPT ~w V10w.VTYP OwwhlgamOMmONTNtlaHa whFhawl Y NTT~hTTV+Owd ^TV lIN1NwP ~wPw TfHINi1 NNTINi1 TrPN~POydNT~NNaTP ~ Q V iNP yyCF\ Jan =~0 f0 W Nw E E N, ... E o~ Y `sY o iii MIRY SY 7• Y 1 Y Y Y Y Y 1 Y 1100 FY YrLLi/ KX YwY 11~Y M Y Y 11 Y •i~ •i11 Y •O• •i• II Y II opeeoee.lepaepeweonpweos«oooeae«owoeowaweeNe«new eeeooooprvoNhP.ler«eaa«pewepNeeNreeeeeeNaeeerp.INa. N N atlN Pa aONPa1eTNObtiPPO w.IlOarer P.Plna OU~e ae r~n0 ynar.rf ..NNONOyarPreMNNabPMN1.b PN.Va OMNaawhaPNO b..p N a raa«M OAa p hN NNa N ~1N PPNN .. pN aN a NON pPOwNTrNprpP O~.N NaNarOPONNNINOPOPOMN Na N'Or pPW pppppPPPPPPOp000000peNw.. M...Yww~NNNNNNNNNNNNn wwPPPPPPeweepeeeeepeepeppeeeppeeeeeepeee seoeewoPOOPOwpoe.weppe..w...~.....r.I.w+NwnJN.«.......rrnwr.....a~.,.~. orrraaaaaaaaaaavaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarararraaaaau raa V O { O p p O J F R P 9 ~ i i a a 4 O < I i NO N I \O_I p p S Op! P O m a L O M e J p IJ P` r < Yt i111Mw Y N I{ i NiL ~Yi eL u WO U F aNO r~1e+ f iN MFZp < N S S ~ M1IN i LM 1 W NJ Y UN J P a OY Y O ~ eu .O.W Mt\iW a JL LW { Y900Y iFV M Oi L~J Y i Nu12 T Vi ONOL ~ LW<FNO`J YWWpOM W W 3 rYpWW N f <00 NIYN FWUJLi WJN06iNt < WOM Mi aY Fj Ti MY_a_NNI hiLYi YiTO i NOWNJWJW ai Np J1L W •e_L ION -iLN !i O•NN FNVi~t 6.M0 t ~V pNhW ~jM NY1 FNNFN HJFOMUy ~YYN \_iNy~MYIf 10l1L.IJ PMLNa N< V>OL WIYJ VLLOWJOOMWNa n1i JMN.YNJ Ln~iLWNOWiW MWW YZ W WLfV1..OFWWf Wi1p.{aYNWON r _U W__YY_ r I NLLJ Np VF FOfY it14VJii • O 1-i NOO<p NV> W fZW ____Ifir FYWYOU_V N! r_f_WIO OV _r (f01 O~NNIaL1iVt J N J r U 2 _ _ = r J Z 1-I o Ni =p N i V F rf Ni LL i° i rM Le a Wo'm ` a. of Yso s s ov Lo LUJY S N S . - WWCN[ Or Y W J F i i z O.Ir JO aNbnO r~" VwP.•r1;pN.101N111111PNVTIIdddNprprrapNP~Pp ~ppYOtiNON N.J - ~~1. rNryrTr000NONaN NrONaJNr«POOPOI MP.w NNNN~N N. ,. NT NI~NN n.iN.ald Mlry.1NNMNN~~n~aON~ara„TN MT .v .: Y ~ Y Y ~ wM 11 I 1 1 1 1 I PP 0000 O OamPODN0N0000000V• nis _ ce-ri.ioienv.inr~ ~:< a icm m mN a n°ei'ron°nNnm .. .. .. .. 'o a .. wN N N ~...~., \4ttM1 N rr N A Ia N ^ N /a q /a Ia n N n n MO• fryp^I^ NPaMwNa hrnN NOO MNVNNM mP ONOM1OpONNmaNiFmpOMNmaNah •aaaaaona aammmmmmmaaa.aamwNNNNNNNNaaaaaaaa mmaal-M1hr-NNNNmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNpNNNNNNNN ~~h1"RPP}PPPPJPOOO m00000000000000000000000m000000 mNNlm mrnmmmmmwlm lrNl;rlmaJal l V a V a1 V a1aJaVaa V a as V as V a a1 V aaJ U 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 If ; 1 f .. 1\ OTm O WSF N U a N 0 r+0a a a M1 Pa O i{N a h \N< m Wi{FN w° N ~ m m m N R ~ m°ao °z s io w r i m so . \ i ~ m>m w O S PN W'1 m V V v <V" '~ ~ _ W ~ O mVpV pV Pm VLLVPVmJav N i_Y u' iNp Y JY.O M w O CIF e e n FNO O \ \ I \ \ N NNN Or¢ 2r¢ ;n W< OWN OVO N p P R P N mOOfO Nf NnN~V00 O wyV Jlr10 <;+;+ _ _ \ _ WOWSOL m27 DOZNO rv T>fN.aai fVmV I;OM i~ wN'JOV~ h 1~nM1YWm 2m1 mpaOZN..lo6 n CpSII wN •SIYLL\ N9.NWN 7J O < F Fi ~ bf MPNN' yU.NN O O o O F O w Zf J~JI>~ NSFm OIN aZ NN NN WNyNV«>Ww L D iZ Jf V¢umy.ytlM1J J~nVu I;U;~ V Z JN w_O w_ViJJ n2JNS VU YZ ON46N0\m V2 LL N.S IN US2 u u V V u V V O[YOOpJp_p_w_ _ u r SaCiuiu .r nVMZ2~hn nYli ZhNNmSJ9 Jy;NIN'J r+>^N h2 ~iYN277FY2 VSm[NOO LL9wu wLLZLLLLNUNLLSSVLL¢2NN O D 2N»Wf 7J WO>w >y w;u y7J<Yp uJOwwO f__f > > a T > } > > > r¢-Z ~aSNZJiU HWOR OR>OKmf[iV>NYaV LL l 2 O J M1 ) p Op n[ ~f X3 Ilo rD J = N p N 2 •M1M1 V YJW Vm i~ N J iWJ ZY O } yo.J ZOp O;- O N iZVU m J r> { V .S P00 V"I;W ZJW J W 2 ; WJ WW{ V ~MN D D O 0Y) w N Zi OI] i O i y <w HVi yj 00 a V m N D nN V Z N JNS[SJJJ > J t i J Jf f f'~f< { rc< p F N f O W f[ VJ.'O Yi 00 T • N N r;l yaapO OOmm VNNr~mmaODOpawaNNirlmhnl;r~ m O NP 1`j ~0 amPaPalilV N/aO NN00NNNO T'1 ri n~ n m y m a n aN w mN m .°+w°mT.Ni.Nl raa ^wi.N. a;~m-~'ir'~i /' ppp.pOCOCppCCpmmpdo.aCmepNmOCnw.Onlp pmaNOpGO vomooooNneeovom~nomnennweemveemrrvPnvowaaPewee oom Nio - mi <.. ~+a ::%_i`n'nn.°.n as <mPPa..a:1'-.°1.dalA.1 wnwran a NMn my P \Xx! Pn rv .o J ~n ~n mX 01X1 JmPOnNmawdFmPOwNAaNdF mPOMN m.IN mhmwm my AaNaFm TOMNin.INaFm .p dFFhFhhFFFFmmmmmmmmmmPPPPPmPPPP0000000emOFFnn n.ynnrv Nadadadadaadaaaaadad oao POOeaaeeoeeo~noococeeeeoooomoemmooooeeooemoP~ OaaaaaaaaaaaVaadaaaaaaaaaaddaVVaaaVaalaaa aaaaVaaadaa 'u i [° s o ~ h ro •W O¢m ~f n N Ji i H F a z o vu _ i N N NLL • N r~ Y 20 Ww J M r J S FV J jy Fy O JV OJ h¢w O~Y1LL'1~W V wJ F Z tp Y F ZII JK h~[J ryM¢hNw3FmNV JP32 rvOy _V¢%o yi VVPwryN `a>FNO m i~.m ea~mie~ai mwi ~. .- °ani iz~ o~ z~m wm~s ~.LLw ANN VOii Y\NAmnhNi~ >2N>muY NY nT NNNN>¢ NNtS] N Nw NhS ~1Z wwN[JSwNN w U:w yM ¢NUf ~InNCJZJ~w iSf Umf d2a min am a2 IiVm NYJNOIS2Nrc [JJJ ¢~' J ZZV[SwJJ W[Ow Ow[~Z JZJ Nn VhLL VfYLLFauUVFLLUZU mUVNVUL V WZUVV~maO J;:u •V ZV ~PII wOfOJFw6o;w tlOOfOOwJUFOOtiw OfJWOJYJf]Ofan wJNOwe V Ym2yfh¢2¢F223¢SZFf FSLLUFSVYU2Ymo01~.uJ22ayV 2h2 n~~uy71-IY IL 2vuuuO,iLLLLnVZULLLLfruwirSiLLiNWULLYnOwS2 LIlJ42Y4NLL W\>wwOOFJwf wwvlwPwmw uSYV¢awi~¢u[ce¢¢V¢¢ZN~manFYYtl>[m>r~p¢¢V a.pLL>uJ¢[O>nuZn NJ l J V p uN rv T o } ~ u n M1W IIS 112 Y¢ I10 110 mF Vd10N'PNmdNPF TOFa1N FdTA dN mPdOAdnnO nJldOin ~n nnPNmNF wn1N PM11 A PamNFpNNmaddNanmda m.~lm OFF mmrrl~PPPmmmp Trllp OO NNFFF wTnTmgn wA.M1 N~IThArN1mNN+1AT Pn1n ^1d'Amn Pi NdA nn Pn+l a r^ w m ~~ Fa0000aoo00000TO00000dNnmeON0000000+ nt m00F Oa1N N0.•N ppp ON NF 0000oonNNFOa0+n000+no00NOOP n ~f paON N100 NSv MOh n a m mN O \ .. a mmYN.• m OYmmNH•ra+Nnnr a Nah p.• PNV N YN am NNw. r N \R¢X T n=^ Y •OR JPOTNmJNaFPPOYNman+FOPONN ma nahPP O.•NrnaNaF PP Or•NmVn+Fmw Rt• .•NNNNNNNNNNmm~mmnT nnwlV.V+a++a+.NnNNNnNNNNaNaaa+aaaa >eaeeo°oeooapvoeo°oo°ooe°aoeeoeoooeoopooooeo°eocc+eaeeeeoaooo oaaa+a..aaaaaaaaaaa+aaf as aaaa.raaaaa+raa++aaaaraa.a. u P f . f s ¢ ° ¢ c ~ s iz J za s a zY o o •w ~o O1 w rc w u i + w~ + FYa Y sR(N ~ sew °or \YY > F\w •P •nZ W PO OO Ztii i a S z v w Rn \m NP S _ W )R V00J ¢'J d s os w J N i UWNtw bN LL NN mNUN ¢OW V Of PU SZ f OY¢ Z NO JFZW O Y ~ 1 U Y 2)O F w O Y 20•.v000YNY WSfOWrUOmnv Hdp NO m JJNZ¢¢O Y +ThoFNUY~ ~' NW+voa<S¢a LL¢JS F ~OfLLm ~ FT ~INmnT606 wp+ +f M2 Ja1mV7wZ N LL o!I f~LL»¢wwNPSw¢r ~Z ilk» ¢ N NO vJ NF •Jwvti FY NIOVUt2NNUm¢¢2 HF6¢NNw¢N N WFW¢ UYYiYNN>7 cN N J OV<rVUU2 NZY af fUZU¢2h2NN w~u jJSr~OTYJJS72WJ NJJY.JIJ JYWSOOwM FZJJN OZ I 7 VFFVVfVUVIZaLLVw FhZ VVFVVLL VUf6VV+aVV Uf iuFFNU w ZY UV¢ ZY2 ¢JVUww w w OONOw.Of400J0 Vf OOUCXOOwrWO~F 1J+iJOOa gpJ OOw¢OIO a u yY32v VSFY22ZF62¢¢mZPS Ymzz Z2zF6FZUNf¢¢YV22¢mw2V S 7rcY777 Z~vaY7S J'7wU2¢OhYiO 7nR-70F?»ZYZJV w YMJOVW¢,v CSZVLLaLLaZLLLL>4LLLLVwNLL¢iOZZ9SLLLLSOULLZ oOW wppdwtuw m¢wwY a n rtw rt n LL~unuusiio a ~ pso LLWUw>¢muo¢¢P a o va ii-rcn iY uW¢K s iaw x ¢' v V a r r z _ i' Y. u`r N ~J o Y.l ~. OJw U V ~ C . V YY VZJ+ wi Zn ~ VO S 23VJwhvw mpZ2 OR9 Jll[a Wfo ~ .U•Fii U U LLN O¢Yn M•f NY Y2 OUr¢+SUY L YOrV 2i+J'J FiI K 242 LW • u2V 1F >NY¢¢W¢ift3J'JZ¢¢f 4f YIZ OY6 09I FtYO lOF 10Of MZf tO 2wJ r'O19J ¢ WO JZ UNWO¢Y1LY ¢Y ni ° Ns ¢. •LL JJ>fwzWwz Na Nfr ooW l Y LLi , 11 D¢J6 W W') RV F.. OVYJ9 wlO. ul Y . 2Y0¢ZNYVfu. .fJ. .J¢•F¢.i 20 ~NJYNM1f/YiJL2 JOR.~ R ¢Nf zwlVV aMZVf NF. Mf .)FWZOiaZrJJ IF210L OOV OW / R fhZ.O N62NV WYwMWfSYYW1YY wVf W000f OwiJ aON¢LLNVYNNNi_NU_ F OFpNNNYOZ¢VV¢¢FFVOipi> hJLJNVSUOWwF r¢3WYl[NLL w0 LI I J2 nNMJiYhYWLZOOLOYOJ Of RW6 UJSfLLJJN2FNOOFNUWLLZLi9f Si R2• OPWVW Yw~uW WWLLLLLLLLLLLLVOUVSUVVZLLZSSYSSSSSZMYY~711799rR[¢ IXI >'X FNilr a'/1aYnFPO+mONpNYNf NN T•~+I~IONaThmP++N dNaNpFNN1NNTTip XOX wONnhF}r.F NFNFm>mmf OP Pa pn'00NP000POTOadPaPPWYaPPOPT Yf XYM nTNn M'1 PiF TNT m+Ii•1r YnTTP1YTmnrvNTmTT Nmnm~TJ OqM+aTwY1.•^1nT.• '~ 3 R / iNP uK\ rp„ LLNW ~_: m~iv 61i •Z II GSM •OY Yw• Y>^ oesmoNaonaneemNPamoemoemrvoeemmromnoomorvem eo mooommyooeemNmnoomaaoneN on rv ar±mrrnrnnNNmOa~mNNmm^H+N '.m m~vn u~p4Nn as ~v.L~. T.rn y+ r K•w.tNN rv n r main ran mmam n+Nanmme rl..m+NanmmorNmaN an m>ennn+NanmmerrvN+Nanmmo NoNa aeeoooeooooaooooa oaaeae°a°o°ee°e°eoeo~n`~`~~~nn~nnrrr-~ o memeeeeeoeoooooe o...a.aaaaaa+a++++.+a.i°a aaaw aa....++aaaa.aa•+++.aaa y a .. f. < i• Nz m Nu aW vv i "1 ,o i mn Z C v mi \V Sm \m_ w J Il ?a • 0 _ m 1 FI V I`u rvV OV Y[ _ `v S~rvVr w >wtW• 62f Y LL F09 N J vw20G2yN2w O nnSOON O~i~•JSSOwY JL VS~LL+Om'>J O w m .JK'J WNZZJ fOJ 62'JO ~IWwuw moo.°.` xyi mw nu eW~oww WfoWWWin'+is'WWr~oz VNSY wZVN=n W~tw --.YnnwYVww e.vN+LwnOpyM1e O •Z rcMN• fa`1a VnNRN NHnnNrctt ORw < O..1V n Nw wv w niw Ntw 1_y.rw F wln r 2 O v V J >: w2 M ni „°~ > n .. ~i n t. ~o iii J i'e' '::'"'"'o'n'o` 7wnw 's~JZS°°a~l SJL OZVWn n 2n2 e_n V'vm¢ J of vNZv i _ N3~1LZ Jt.t> it fn W O¢6 vL J~Jw V.NUOnJ~ d „ n .lJwv wLnWi6~t'w aum v n OJ26o v_> Ff f'J `OVOJ nY.V tVVV p'wN U [`• N9LVLJMWZ u l'mWWa_J<vJ •.W NNW SVSJR LYVr1F 1f 6 O =C,9W VOWGO ~JM< A yOSNRO[N N)\W G'mYV MO Jw OOtNJ SO„ w JJ L'SR •~ O L Vv3eWV nf2C0wWwwf\WfZ_ •• e7: wwawSy<J< y N_N wl G VVNNS bJLL aYNJL~ 32fw JnNJ. OO N~.~fL Ui.Ji uuuu ~eSi rOi ^Y~ nwJOU•ONNae N.\+le'VamnaaNNaamNNmaNNNmarann N.la L/1MNPgpa PrP N(unaON rN ONnrPnnnONONe a:NNN0+00rAr00aNry000MPNN0N wrn~mD;a.Ity NrN m r~wn nN n mrrrlTTYrnnnAmT w NNmyTMTT N I ~u1r/ O ±Nm J4w V~\ Vyo •; Pni~ ~nan ospeeoNOnpaap./aemmNmmmmNppeamoNmoemepehmoleeoomeen G .. nemelNO..h eeeNNenemo ehnanmmmenonnamoaNNmomm! ..ap an~aprlNhNn.,.~maneNNnno P.nNeormnP„PP~m ~'>~ //l rJn: J.nim iaOrvmJlhn~rm N,h a.n T N Np a nrr a n N N a a n .. n N .. NanmP O-/NTIN.phmPOTNnlN W/.¢POrNnaNanmaor nnnnnNnn•«aa!!!!lNNinN mNNNNNaaamaNaaaaYn nM1hhnhhnnnnYnnhnnrnMnnh nu.F nnhnnnnM1hnhYn Oc0000 e00o00p000e000e00000000oVpp00 i!!lIJVV!!!!lailliiVi!!!i llaiVlili!!!!!i!!!!!!i!!iV n K> • K ! !<!i I U 1- •H ! •; _ P 2 O n .~ w0 _ Vr aJ S < K ;! ammT Z.¢./ p V Y iVi O n > 1 J O~rv °O n V O NN peeo~! N K K p 2 O„ .W./w r/S iW-r Uw ul.. J wN m YN.n00 OJye ; w x JoJ ZSJt Z p00;00 O O JnNNNNKw wN r_Y _NNV p2x nu ~~'~_~ uuJn ~2\2(mZ2(:~4 m„4 2i; •, ••-O JS J OWniuuu ~JN O° 'J'JO..'iF S n ~LLNfO WNY 22LL UO LLwaLL LLh°>7 JnmNLL /n 6wwOLLLLLL3LLMLLVY ;N wM1WwNYlalr/n Na Pwl uN~VOr2 :r ../. az K~¢¢ wor°oe°z~ m°¢N n wZVVOVZ!<V ¢w V VZ KV r L'i wZ22u2NZOa Zh tu.LWLS2'mYwOw0 Cw N20PO MpZVmmNn uLL wjOUOSWL020 W Z . ; 22r+;r ; r LLaFNOtl NNOP aYNw1Ni2J iu2 Yuw 2V YLLw r/.Yn W>Y2hY: Z nr2~~YaJW w Vus JJ:ul ;JItl.J<awi OWfN Suff.:Y.P<.J wF4YnVUFi!°a[w°wUn wF~WJW2h iallJm2-Ji'uV WwwFnw w/.w rip _2JJ2 u'2/-Z ruYY7rUrtumnK63sWm92inn nNnC7nJNK/G2244¢Smnrt ri' ~NeQU u~w OJ~.'YWW>W¢w 01~wi~NPOrw WIpOWOw.YwwaW./Y ^JW Y.ZUL~i6Lla aYvLLWm¢OmtOK Cb(b KTJNNaC6¢000K `~. LOK¢LmmO.na a! 2 Z2Z 7 O~J J JJJ p V W S fQf JJJ Y i 2 O S2Z2 V LL N NNN ~J Y a i iJp iiii i W '.i> Ni ri N rlll f~~.ri LV YY O n24'v JJfN ui.i.`.e ° -::oiiNafJOKrweeppi o¢. Jf oLL FJK nz.°. a l'N N(YJVJVi00WU JrV ^f ~YrNNrfOJ NJ2'Jm ZNhVKOu /,6 YVNW u.'Omff C.2 -Kr wpiw ~iW LLr! ZPWn K UVNWO ~>~~ J <KJC>O Siw °NKK LLr VNN'f°nK Ue n/W nY>I4 m uJN 'LOW JN OmK 9x OU S° ~! LSW /f i° N ~•. pie wJWVf>N W W xK OLL4 n~lSYYF-O M.'!wV( NS 2 O °NNW~ VN JNOSNMr~rw2KWi>U>N • DVY}vl °OO2HV nV ON Jy ih NF`IVY V>f M°>¢NJ JJ JNfWJ.W N O YNHYOa F' 02i/ p'J¢mLL~`J¢YNpn ff if i.IS /fGJWpm;00W°LLVVW 4dOJVtt'IUVJ ih'uWW fWf JJ SYVUVdRY¢L(Y¢W<WpNiLL S CF N.u L7fJ(p2Ze00NVYmOOM>mY.J L22<e JJ<<YaJG OJiC<JMK ¢JJ f<f!~•Y''.u.~MpO000YfffVUWrO000000nrYYrO /f ffiKK;J FS/ 6nn,Gq'JiKK([KttYKKb¢mKpgKNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~M1N NNNrnrMYFYrY R nOX nO rN N~O"PNPOONFN 01~1MPnennNrONm+1~~n IPNaNNnnINeONlNmN 1d J•w N! lNJ9 P./Nm.~rP V J MJ II n~0on namTH INNYJ Tm/e.ImJ ~rJrlwn.Viyy yn NTn a.un T,xPOJNmnw„~N F S x T n/ny ~ ^I~n (n/ +1 n. nn n F>F 1 tl• 0 nNmV h~om~uoneeoorum~ ~°n` N.~1JmVhm PONN m.I mtlhePOy nhnnnhl- On4000 Il Y'~ if11•1JIIIJfIVVIVa11 S ~ Y J ~O~ 27 SY RI O~ O11 2• Wt Y: InOIN r~Ym N~IOm Owr~1 PO nh m.~ti TP +1 ~1 JITTnP~m~ W CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION M0. FEBRUARY 7, 1990 RAGE 4 Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the Drovistons of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules ~nA rem,l of irtns aAn r!-_A n,rreuanf iherofn of fM fi,an 41M fhie rnnfrar! Is awarded. The work is to be dine in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of P,ancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. copies of the plans ant specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 525.00, said 125.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be nailed when said request is accaaganied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursa6le payment of f15,00 to cover Lhe cost of nailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regardln9 the cork contracted to be done by the Contractor, the ContracWr may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities to lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, reserves the right to ro3ect aqy and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19_ or ATTEST: e ADYERTlSE ON FEBRUARY 13, 1990 FEBRUARY 20, 1990 d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: city councn anti City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civ11 Engineer SUBJECT: Award and authorization for execution of contract for The Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monument Improvement Project located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Maven Avenue for the amount for the amount of 5201,397.00 (5183,067.95 plus LOS contingency), to be funded with Beautification Funds, Account No. 21-4647-8719 (FY 89-90) a. E~': RECOI(tEEIDATION: it is recomaended that the City Council accept all bid proposals as received, award and authorize execution of contract The Haven Avenue Gateway Entry Monuaent Improvement Project to the Lowest responsible DTdder, Harris Construction, for the mount of f183,087.95 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend f201,397.00 (5183,087.95 plus SOf contingency} to be funded fray Beautiftcation Funds Account No. 21-4647-8719 (FY 89-90) BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 30, 1990, for the subject project. Harris Construction, is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of (183,087.95 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 5184,110. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be caplete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp bmitted, B:dlw Attachment cc: Purchesin9 ~~. S;.. ~h:. yN N_ H H p N H S N S S S S S y yG • i ~ N pm S N ~ ~ N O 8 8 ~ S N 8 1~ F i ~a N n N y Y <~ CiN 0J H J N q N H .Na ~ m OI n r r J J H O 8 H V 1!1 ~S p V S S S S H S H H S 6 ~ .F ~ S j 53 N b ~ ~ ,F. Q S{ ~ ~ N ti Q~ Z' ~ ~ O J S H H H H n H N N H m G J ~ .y H .~ p 1T1 R HQ p C N pS S H H H H H H S L i ~~ Q N i F 1 n11 M I ~ p O ~ 0 ~~Q p' 1+1 ~ ~ ~ N F y< 6 ~ < F< N N C qJ p N S G H S N S O S N J N J H n H p `~ Y 1~) ti N N G H ~O H S S H H S S H H Q~$$ ~Q rl ~ ~ ~ `Q~ ' to G N R ~ $Q $ V aj A N O ~ F 3 N H N ~ N p N ~ q J ^N ~ T H wNi Q8 w ~ lV J J i yHy~~ 1~1 ~ ~ H $ H S H ~ g p S H g g 8 y ~ 1 ~ ti ~ ~ p N ~ ~I N o V ~ ~ ~ N S S H H O C H N ~ p N H yy ~~ OJ q p ~ N n N N ~ J J ~ ~ p N ~ S S S S S S S S S S H N g St y$ S ~ R ~ S g F ~ g R ~ u~ 8 N 8 N 8 ~ 8 N H8 C N CH N W m J . + 1» J J . + W N W P N ~(` ~N ~LL ~+N NLL wN OLL G qW ~1~ ~ NV N N Oli `~ V ~J J ~IJ I IJ NJ J J NJ n ~ ~ g ~ s _ oa of .. asq eg 8 » ~ s» "ns n as ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~ g~ q``P ~YeY~ ye~ My ~~ $ Yya e. M sa M ~ q~q ~~ y ~~ »le ~~, »1• ~e, ~~ [ ~ ssYYa ~ S eMMe ~ tpY[ ~ ~ ` ~n ~ ~ Ny M ~~ O V u I.IY n ~ r .y N n~ • N b n q q w .i a:c . "~~ce .: i ~ ~ . ~ ~ eMr ¢ t ~ ~ y S e V N ~ K s ~ 8 _ ~' b ~ s ~ ~ _ N ~ ~ Q ~ a t ~ ~ ~ 6 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ .. ~ g ~ ~ Gt b y'w i ~ ~ 31 ...:. rsk ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 SS S 8 S 6 ~ ~ m ~ ~ x "a e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ m_ ~~ s g 8 N ~ g ~ R R R R St R R 8 R Q e V O ~ ~ ~ N y S .y N P r ~ r G ~ «< d p p C p C O .r 6 O O O O b T N C ~ g q s si ~ J J J .. - a : p p pN p Q p p p p p K O O O O ~ N ~ O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ s -, ~ p p p p p p p p w OC W C O G O O N N N N N N O ~.~ m p pqW pQ ,py Q .pp-~ p J pJ p~ p N N N ~ W m ~ T e `E 1 b U m p ~ ~ i ~ ~ Lp~ p ~ p p p p 8 0 0 ~ ~ N p N O J J ~ s S~ s m ~~ s s x ~ a 3 g ~ m a~ a g~ ~ ~~ S ppp~~~~ ~ Q~ ~~p 8~ p p O ~ N N + o .W.i J J N 0 ~ 8 8 Qa 8 8 8 ~ 8p$ 8J 8 QaS R~8 8 N ~~ ~ N _ ~ p N m N_ N W ~ $ 8 8 8 8 R ~ St O ti R ~ ^ N N J J m i W }5 W p i ~AU N N ~ NN ~N nW VN J J NJ W t~D ~L yy G SN p~ K F ^ ~ C J~ N F r r . r ~ V ~~ C ~ "s "s'~ $ E a- "s ~ a "n "s "a i 5 ~ ~ s£ ~ r r~ rr~' r~ r~ r r5 rs ra r~ $~ r~ ~ a a'a afg~ a~ a~ a a a_ a a~~ ~~~ a; ~ J G r i H H i • ~ i N N N O m N YI ~ • N • •M ?s nrM ~Pr •~ ~~ •T~~ ~~~ ];r lam` M ~ y CC ~C IfC wC 3m r• e`a_g --;i ja ~a ~» c~ -~i 'F~. .. _ ~ .. ~ .er a; N J rN r r rl~i ~'' r~l rO NVQ N~ r~ t = TO N N T •I~ Tm TO TN +1• N~ s s ~p N iE1 P f 1~ xp1 pN Np pN r0 T i~ g ~ ~ N O O 8 O O ~ N ~ i i ti ~ N ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •s •s •s 's 's s 's 's s •s 's " s s N N rc N ~ e ~ ~ ~ G N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ 's a 's g s a g 's 's ~ 's N 0 r N N W r0l 2 G N N ~ N A V ~ U+ NO C V m ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ a 8b' 8 8 S 8 A ,. 8 8 1 6 ~. ~y O b yG O 1 33 .~,a r ~~ ~~ 0 r ti J e R r ~ ~ .. ~ a~ i yY F ;' K G ~ ~~ 8 8 8 S ~ SS• s 8 8 8 8 R a ~ ~ m ~ ~ N S N H H N N ~ p $ o~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ h v~ ~ i p N •^+ N J J N 8 8 p O p O H p O H p N H p O p O w + • r ~ S 8 S ~ $ n 8 8 ~ ~ N S p ry ,y N J J F C 8 C O O O C O O O C O 8 p O [~ O p O H ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y m N N n 0 Y Y ° 8 N R0 ~QBf H ~ H N 8 ~ j N Q N m • 4 1~ 1~1 J W y ~ e e ~ p ~SI U ~(r ~f ~ N M ~.•N nW N J J v~iJ M ~g~g R~ ~Yl~ .d w r~- .~• ~~ ae s~g~ a~ ~~ ~~~a ~~ ;3~ ~~ a~ e a ~~ ~ ~ .~~ yE S Fes' ~~ ~~ g~ ~~~~ ~C a~ ~ M E ~~ pa ~ _ it' ~~ g~ VV ~ •yM a~~ a a~ ~ R N N CITY OF RANCftO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 yr To: City CounGii and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award and execute the Professional Services Agreeetent far the perfonaence of Professional Services with respect to the surveying of Public Norks Design and Construction projects at various locations in the City to be funded frow the various proiect accounts at the agreed hourly rate RECOMIEIDATIOY: It is recaassended that C11<y Courc11 accept the suMaltted proposal, award and execute the professional services agresent for Professionai Services with respect to surveying to Magner Pacific, Incorporated. BACKGROUNDlANALYSIS In order to exparM our sources for surveying, staff has requested, received and reviewed qualifications and proposals aM has deteradned that they aa+,et our quallficsttons to provide subject services for City projects. Staff has received frs Magner Pacific, Incorporates, executes Professional Services Agreaeents and insurance docuaw:nts, reviewed the and found the to be coiaplete and in accordance to the City's re~~lre~aonts. Res y d, C w.'~ :L :dlw 3ei, a~ y° STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 iD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Chuck R. Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer ua,iECi: Ayprc~sl 'a award a.^.d aut!~r!xation ~^ execuro a Professional Services AgreesKM with Austin-Foust Associates Inc., for a traffic study for the proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan area. The consultant fee will be 530,000 to be funded freer a 530,000 deposit snide by the Caryn Cospany RECONENOATION: It is recosasended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreesrent with Austin-Foust Associates, Inc., (AFA) for the above rcfercnttd work. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Austin-Foust is the rnnsultant fires that is preparing the Rancho Cucssonga Transporation Model (RCTM). The traffic analysis for ew cNv,nAa wnw~A e...r1I1~ o/ap lcwtol ar~w ,wmf utilise 1hr arnl analyze and evacuate the proposed slreet systesr for the ENSP and on-site and off-site traffic lsglacts and propose ^lttgetion sreasurcs for lnteriA and build-ouc (2010+) traffic conditions. In order to insure a tisrely and accurate study, 1t is strongly recosssended that the ease consulting fins, AFA, be stlected to accosrplish the Etiwanda North Traffic Analysts (ENfA). The Caryn Cosrpany, representing the Et/wands North developer's consorttus, has deposited 530,000.00 to fund the ENTA. It 1s rccasatended that the ENTA be funded frasr the deposited 530,000.00 for a total not to exceed 530,000.00. Respec ltted, .._...-,,.~.r~ RNM:CBr:}y-~ Attachsrent ~W -;,. ~., RESOLUTION N0. GJQ -C7`y~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, TO AMAAD AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT MITH AUSTIN-FOUST n~Siii;inie5, iiii,., F,. P~F.,.".,°"•~~ ~ • m.Rlr crnv enp THE PROPOSED ETIWANDA NdITN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA WEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Gucamonga desires to guide the study of the ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN; and iirieREAS, the City Engineer ndS dt.-ec;sd that a thGro+:yi;, in-deptfi traffic study which includes analysts of traffic site and off-site impacts be accomplished; and WHEREAS, the developer's rnnsortlma desiring to cosplete the study of the ETINIINOA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN and couwence devetoptng has deposited 530,000.00 to pay for the traffic study; NOW, TNEREFdtE, BE 2T RESOLVED TFil1T THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIN: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, GOES HEREBY RESOLVE to award and exacuu a Professional Services Agreement with Austin-Foust Associates, inc., to provide seritus as ootctofexceedv;30,000.00 tribe funded yothedabove deposited Ktertals fee, 37 y~.. h, ~_. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FRON: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SIIR.1Gf.T~ Guard a^.~ au!hor?Zeti .n fJr cnci.u viun oT GOOLraCt fer The Parks Nalntenance Retrofit Protect and The Parks Capital Retrofit Protect for the amount of f563,215.OD (f512 ,013.50 plus lOf contingency), to be funded frw Maintenance Account No. 01-4647-7043 and Park Development Fund Account No. 20-4532-7043 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bid proposais as received, award and authorize execution of contract for the Parks Maintenance Retrofit Protect and the Parks Capital Retrofit Protect to the lowest responsible bidder, Taylor-Schaefer, for the amount of f512,013.50 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend f563,215.00 (f512,013.50 plus lOf contingency), to be funded from Maintenance Account No. D1-4647-7043 and Park Development Fund Account Nn 70-4K39-7043 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on January 5, 1990, for the subtect protect. Taylor-Schaefer 15 the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a Dtd amount of f512,013.50 (see attached bid susmmryl. The Engineer's estimate was f460,771.00, Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and 1n accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp y~submitted, Attachment cc: Purchasing a a e z o G R 8 Y - m 3 R 8 gyo ~ „ ~ 3 W ~ ~ 8 k $ Y ~a 8 $ a ti. ~ N ~ ~ ~i s e ~ ~ / ,. -~~ ~ ~ ~I vaa .? t%_ 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 S 8 ~ 8 g 8 8 9 8 8 8 88g & g m ~ ., ~ ., _ .. .. ~ R ~ $8 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 '8 St S ~~~ a 8 8 a 8 8 8 3~ 3 m ~ ~ g ~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ,. s $ ssss a s s g ~ m .. ~ ~ m A _ ~ _ N .. g .. s s s s s a s a s s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ 5 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ P a ssss s s s s m J ~ a - ~ ~ ~ s s sass s a s a s ~ W ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R :7 R 4 P a a p~ 2 ~ J y ~ ' ~ A S .~ ~ :-& ~~ E; O 8 ~ S~ M u ~' ~ ~ 9 ~F~ YW Vi : ~ L ~Y MQ ~i ~ ~~ ~_ A ry M V O A ~ ~ Ng ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ pa i ~~ '~ C~ ~ ~ 8 ; v ; ] ~~ 2 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 74 ' ' ~ t a aa S~i ± ~y { •3 4' F R w S ~q ~ " g ~ ; 'qsS 3 2 S~ ~ i ~ R ~ : ~' SRE __ - # ~ ~' ~ ~ t x ~ ~ 8 F ~° 8 N g 8 8 ~ ~ S d 3S It G g 8~ ~ ~ o ~~" a ~ y $ 2 8 e ^e 8 is tl 8 8 8 8 8 8 g iS ffi 8 ~ 8 '_ A ~ 8 ~ S 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ S 8 ~ ~ $ 8 8 f's ffi 8 8 8 8 i5 S 8 .n . .~ u « N 8 8 8 g 8 8 gg S w ,Er ~~ 8 8 ~ 2 S ~ ~ 4 e 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o N ~ » ~ « R fi is R _ t ~ g 8 gg 8 ~ C gg gg 8 8 ~ ~ 5 ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~' 8 8 8 g 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 ~ ' 8 8 0 ~ g 8 8 8 S 8 ~ g 8 8 ~ $ ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 y 8 8 8 B B 8 8 8 8 8 15 8 8 . I ' s~: " .a . ~ ~. , F ,,; 'e ~, ' 8 8 8 8 S A 8 S 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ 8 ~ & S 9 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 gg 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 x 8 S a ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 :~~ 3 m ~ 8 S 8 l ry 8 8 A 8 8 J .. ~ 8 Q u gg 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 ~' ~ m 8 8 8 0 8 S 8 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 ~ y m ~ m a .. $ 8 8 8 8 S S 8 8 S 8 8 8 ~ ,; ~ ~ a R ~t ~ 9 ~ 8 ~ g ~ 8 7 8 B 8 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 m '" .. .. ~ ~ ~ a .. .. a ~~ s a s s s e s s s s s a g W g ~ s s_ g s s s s N ~ 3 - ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ s-" r »~ $ n e ta:a~ ~' ~~ ° ~ `t ~~ ~~~ °;3~3~Ij~~~~s~~~t .~. ~ o_~ .,.~ "#r~9gs ~3~ a F~ ~~ g ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ g ~ e r ~ tg ~' ^ " u s a 1 ~ ~ i! ~ ~ " ~ ~ g .~, ~g~ g i 8~~ T F ~ ~ ~il ~ ~ ~ ; G i ~ n ` ~ ~ _ ~ y g 8 8 3 b r - N b 8 v r r ~ 8 $ l 8 - ~ 8 ~ 1 y E _ ~ u~ T '~` b ~ .Y C W ~ _ 8 ~ 1 Q 8 8 8 8 8 g 8 B 8 8 y g a 8 $ 8 u 8 8 8 • . O N Q y ] Q {S r 8 8 8 B B B 8 8 8 8 8 ~ '$ ~ $ m 8 C p g u ~ • N N . N • ~ C O N 1 y a ~ ~ N P Q a ~y $ O ~ ~ Q a QQ s {~-$ 8 8 8 8 8 g $ C V 8 8 T v g ~ t~ ~ C > ~~ fi fi R fi iS 8 ° t ' ' ~ 98t ~ ~ 8 ~ $ 8 g 8 ~ ~ 8 8 5 8 8 , 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ' 8 S W 15 a 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Iq 8 8 0 O ~3 _~;; 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ 8 8 e . g 8 8 8 S ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ag 9g R S 83 C 3 3 4 ~ ~ 3 m ~ 8 8 ~ R 8 ~ .. . 8 .. 9 ~ Q8p 3 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ 8 Q 8Q ~ N 8 a 8 8 8 ~ S ~ m ~ ~ 8 8 ~ 3 $ ~ $ R' $ .. 8 8 8 8 8 a a a 8 8 a 8 8 8 8 R 8 ., 9 a g ~ s ~ s ~ a s ~ ~ s ~ ~ s m 8 ~ s s ~ ~ s d a 8 y W m ~ ~ 3 - ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ u B L i 8b 8 ! .. ~ ~ ~ i~ z" ~ ~ ~ ( z e ~ ~ ~ ~ a• $ i ££ A ~ 1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~: M 'a n F~ ~~' S k~ C o 'O m r w .n ,. :. .. r a a Asa sg ;s ~~ s ~ ~ ~~ ~~x s s Ns x 'F ~, 6 ~, ~ ~ ~ r _ ,Y' B ~ v_ en '6 x 8 8 ~l r are "~ ~ t ~_ i i O_ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ $ ' u 8 ' s s s a s s s s ~ ' $ ' ~ ~ ~ a e ~ s s e s a s e s 's a 8 s a s 8 $ s a 8 a ' $ § ~ a § ~ ~ 8 s s s s s s 's a s s `o -a B Fi ft ft fi It fE ft s t ~ ~ S ~ 0 8 yy ~ 5 g 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 B 8 B 8 •. 7S ~ 8 8 f 8 8 8 8 8 ~ e ~ ~ 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 B ~S y~ 3 e ~ a n o$ ~~ Q e s ~~ E F Q E e y ~ '.~. p 6 ~ g .~ ~ $ g e 8 p s s: o~ `s s; ~F v r~,. ter:. _~ 8 m m g 4 3 m s s g 6 Y E E ! e s s ~ m ~ m 8 8 8 8 8 ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 6 8 8 s s s s s e s ~ ~ ~ s a 8 8 e $ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~. ~ °s B 8 S 8 ~ ~ ~ .. 8 8 8 8 8 S § ffi ~ N 8 8 8 8 R o 8 B 8 8 8 S $ s s 8 s s s s s a ~ ~ ~ m s s s s s a a s a s s si ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s a ~ ~ _ ~! y .I ~ ~ J 3 ~ .. ~ .. ~ Q ~ = G ~ ~ 8 :r $~ ~ Ot~ ~I S SY ~4 b~ l W ~~ ~ ~# ~~ a s3a~ 3s te ~~~ ~i~ ~V~ ~~ & ~ r a a~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A s e $ ,a ~ - i des a s .. - s € a S k 8 - q ~~ ~ ~ H ffi ~ ~ ~ - ~ $ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ g $ y ~ ~ x 8 8 5 8 8 8 8 -. - !S 1^ 8 8 ~ 8 - ~ R ~w 8 ~ ~ N ~ SS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' , 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8~ 8 8 8 ~ 8 $ e _ _ gg gg S ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ffi 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ e f'. 6 ~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s 's s , 's 's a s 's s s ~ s g a a s s ~ ' ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ' ' ~ ' a g ~ ~ a e s s s ss s a s ~ ~ 1 :s k- ~`= ~ ~ ~ Y & m m ., g ~ e e ~ 3 m a S a s Y 3 9 S s ~+ 8 8 8 8 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 S ~ 8 ~ ~ $ ~ ~ 8 8 8 5 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 8 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ « e _ R .. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ .. ~ s g g s a s s s 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g 9 gg 8 ~ ~ ~ B $ 8 k ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 ' 8 S 8 ..~ 3 .. ~ s 8 s a ~ s s a a s S S 8 S 8 'n 'a a ~ a ~ ~ ~ e ce ., a ~ t 8 ~ O g ~I L ^ a' Q N ro u ~ ) ~ * i ` ~ y ~ siLayyyFa~ ~ ~YS ~ ~Y E V~ ' ? f 4 N~ ~ ~~ yylI ~ ~ [ 19 F ~t 1 • ; d P ~ N ~'1 ~ Y1 V h O w ~ ~+ ~~ " _ d~ g~ ^~ ~ a~ ~' ~~ '? g t~ ,~? lea a1= ~ ~ $ e 'q' t ~i ~ 8~ SR ~~ ~ pa ~ ~ i ss'ss s» ~ ; c 'i' =° ~ a ! ~ •~ a ~= ~ s ~ ~ _ s- ~ : - k ~ q a .- Y ~ ~ " ~ ~ - es ~ 3 ~, ~ ~ ~ § ffi ~s ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 's a s s s s 'ss 's .. - € _ y " . 75 !" !4 8 ~ 4 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s e s e s s 'ss 'ss s s ~ as s 'a ss 'ss s s 's 's 's o w o ~ 6 F ~s~~ 'ss sss 's s 's a a s ~ g m $ ~ e ~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ s g a 88 8 88 B g 8 g 3 s n a s ~ 8 ~ 8 # 8 ~ 8 s 8 ~ S ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ .. ~ s m m a s ~ s _ s .. ~ ., s p a ~ ~ ~ J _ s ~ s s z ~ s s s s s ~ 8 ~ g ~ s s s ~ B a s ~ o a V ~ 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 i ~ 8 S Q ~ 8 8 8 e 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 r m S m 8 B J 8 8 . 8 ., ~ ., g S _ ~ P 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 $ 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ 0 8 8 S 8 - 8 _ J 8 8 J ~ J 2 H ~ 3 ~ E 8 ~ S _ B Q 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 R 8 51 8 ~ 8 ~ 8' 8 R ~ 8 "~~- R 8 'a a^r 8 Q W m ~ ~ ~ _ C ~ fi .. Y ~ ~~ ~ = G ~ N u ~ y ~ + ~ 8 So~ ~ £ ~" 1~1 1 ~ y A ~ t1 s n . ~~ r 8 ~ .^R ~ 4 ~ ASS ~° 7'~i _ ? ° ~ S~ ~~ ~ Q9~ _ =~ €~ x - a s ~ a 8 S N _~ N S r - ~ a ~ "s d ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = e 8 ~ 8 8 8 B 8 8 8 8 8 - u,'8 a~ N :^ 8 8 8 :^ 8 8 8 8 4 9 S B 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~{ g r o. ~. w ~c m ~_ ~ ` :^ 8 8 8 :^ 8 $ S$ ° 8 g 5 gg N »ti ~ e i 19 ~ 8 ~ q ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 0 0 o H o a ~.. gg gg ~ L ~ 3 ~ o ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 0 8 8 ,`o S$ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ W 8 0 8 B r 8 N N :" S 8 8 8 ~ 7 ~ ~ g ~ ~ £ p ~ ~ ~ s a e i~ a s a 'e 's '8 's s s ~ JI ~,;~;, _ R 8 8 Rgg 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 k R E ~^ S ~ 8~~~~ E S~ II 9 8 R S m ~ 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ n ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 3 e o 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 8 8 8 a g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~' ~ ~ R e ~ A 8 .. 8 8 S 8 B St 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 51 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 8 8 3 ~ 3 8 8 8 8 B 6 2 8 8 8 6 8 8 8 W~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ Y wm ~ ~. s ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ e - ' M ~ n ~ AW Npp ~ ` ^ ~ O 9 .+ ai i r r o ~e~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STt~FF REPORT DATE: Pebruary 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members oZ the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: AEEIiDYEmT TO A6AEEMEIPf FOR LEGAL BERVICBB Attached is a supplemental agreement reflecting an adJust- ment of rates for legal services tc the city provided by Markman, Arexynaki, Ranson and Goldman. The effective date of said agreement would be ::pril 1, 1990. RECOIO~EDATIOE Approval of Supplemental Agreement for Legal Services. Respectfully submitted, -~~.i.Yi !j~ t Jack Lam, AICP City Manager JLJpr 90-41 Attachment $~~; ~'. :'S':: r, BECOED BUpPLEMEIITAL ApAEIDm'ET !OE LEGAL BEEPiCEE That Agreement for Legal Sen•icea entered into cn Narch 21, 1985 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, and LAW OFFICES OF JAMES L. l1ARIOf4AAN, A Profesaional Co~orati_ sad hoatafara oar,..- her-,... ~, ovy .a amended as of April 1, 1990 as follows: i. =11 references to LAW OFFICES OF NARI09AAN 6 ARC2YNSKI, A Profesaional corporation, in thy; above-referenced Agreement are modified to be references to MARRIAN, ARCZYNSRI, HANSON & GOLDEAN, A professional Corporation. 2. Subparagraphs 4.B and •.C of the above-referenced Agreement hereby nre modified to read as follows: "B. Attorney shall additionally be compensated for all work performed in preparation Por and in c~aducting litigation for City end for other services specified in paragraph 2 above delivered by ATTORNEY other than basic services as follows: "(i) At the rate of one hundred twenty-five dour:: ($125.00) per hrn?r for the services of JAMES L. MARFafAN; "(11) At the rata of ons hundred twenty dollars ($220.00; par hour For the services of ot'':er partners; end 1 ~~ ~' ic, "(111) At the rate of one :hundred dollars ($1J0.00) mer hour for fhw gwryirwn nF a?Anr•.i rrw lawyers. "C. CITY and ATTORNEY ARrQe that the fees specified above in this paraaranh a may be mc"7iv;ed by supplemental mutual agreemer.'~ by the parties hereto from time to time, provided that ATTOA:TEY shall not request any such modification to become eiiactive prior to July 1, 1992.^ 3, other than as expressly amended, the above- raferenced Agreement for Legal Services and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. WHEREFORE, the partiae have executed thim Second Supplemental Agreement as of the dates set forth below opposite the name of each such party. Dated: CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, A Municipal Corporation By__ Mayor By ---~iy Clerk Dated: __ NARIMAN, A.aC2YN8RI, HAN80N i GOLDMAE A prpfagional Corporation By Jemmm L. Marirman, 'trma and "tun~cwun~rc i.~ 2 ~S CITY OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 7, 1990 Tn: City Council and Citv Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 9Y: Jerry Oyer, Associate Civil Engineer SiioJ[~T: npprovai Gu exe~u Le wi~Ci aCt ,°. ;ai~y~ C-.'.-r ~+J ° ""h yet rnn~ylHno Engineers to provide additional engineering services for ~ supplemental ,Ladies required by the San Bernardino flood Control District for Hermosa/Church Storm Drain, C.O. No. 88-084. The Change Order is for the total amount of 512,003.00 to bring the contract total to 5105,847.00 to be paid from Gralnage Funds, Account No. 23-4637.8761-4603-4110. It is Hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above sub,{ect Contract Change Order No. 3 with ASL Consulting Engineers. BACKiROUND/A: Y L y515 The fl nn of ASL Consulting Engineers is ecgaged 1n preparing plans, specifications and estimates for Hermosa/Church Stores Drain. The first .~. ~~~.... ..6..w nt •M ninr. u111 nNnnA Fa..w fhe rb,~~h cfnonf_ aactn westerly in Church Street to a point in Nermosa Avenue dust north of Church itreet, with the second construction phase of the pro,{ect extended northerly in Hermosa Avneue to the outlet of the Alta Lama Creek Channei into Hermosa Avenue approximately 400 feet north of 19th Street. San Bernardino County flood Control has requested a basin routing analysis to insure acceptance of additional flaws Into the Church Street Basin and ultimately into Deer Creek Channel. !n addition, if it 1s determined by the Das1n routing analysis that the acceptance of the additional flows Into the Church Street Basin and/or to Deer Creek Channel are unacceptable, then an impact identification (proposed mitigation alternatives) and permit doc unentati on (impact report) will be required. Therefore, it is necessary to Increase the contract to include additional engineering servi ees for preparing Ehe basin routing analysis oniv and, when and if required, the impact identification and permit documentation will be recommended by Change Order, at that time. This Change Order is for a total amount of 512,003.00 to bring the contract total to 5105,847.00 Lo be paid from Drainage Funds, Account No. 23-4637-8761-4603-4110. Respe y segmltted, i~ vRI1M D:pm~ ~~~- / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Aoorovat of Agreesent for Installation of Public Ia>proveiaent and Dediration between Rose Martinez and the City of Raneho Cucaawnya for street frontage iproveraents along 10296 Church Street. RECOMMEMDATION• it is recoewended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreesent for Installation of Public Lprovewerrt and Dedication between Rose Martinez and the City. BACK9t01/H)/AWILYSIS The attached subject AgreeaienL between the City and Rose Martinez provides for the construction of street iwprovements whic.~ lnciuda street pavement, curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewaiks, ntaining Walt, street lights, and necessary clearing at 10296 Cburcb street. Nrs. Rose Martinez Aas agreed to grant to tlw! City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and lawrovement of Church Street Tn return for the construction of said t~proveaents. The street improveeents will be constructed in con~unctlon with the Church Street Improveamnt Pro,~ect between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue. Respectf s~ltted, RHM. RESOLUTION N0. ~Q - (~~{ S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUIICIL OF THE CITY ~ RANCHO CUCAMDNOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AIREEMEM FQ1 INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEIENi AND DEDICATION FROM ROSE MIIRT[NEZ AND AUI'HORIZiN6 THE M11YOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME NdEREAS, the City Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirmwnts for construction of frontage improvements 1n con3unctton with the Church street Improvement Pro3ect between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue; and kHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, street lights and street pavements located along 1096 Church Street, to be made part of the Church Street Improvement Pro3ect; and NOM, THEREFORE, 0E IT RESOLVED, that the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Improvement Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign saae, and directs the C1ty Clerk to record same 1n the 6ffice of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. !~ ~., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5TAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 7, 1990 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Approval of an Agreement for Acquisition of Off-site Property, Security. and Deposit for Tentative Tract No. 13812 located north of Highland Avenue and Nest of Etlwanda Avenue, submitted by Natt Southern California, Incorporated - Stonegate It is recommended that the CTty Council adopt the attached Resolution approving an Acquisition Agreement, Security, and Deposit, also authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ~'.. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A staff report was presented before Council at the January 1T, 1990, meeting approving alignment and concept use of condemnation proceedings for Summit Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue westerly to Tract 13812. To date theft are three Drooerti es in which the Developer has been unable to obtain sienatutts for the required easement documents. The City is authorized by State Law to acquire by eminent domain that property necessary for street improvement purposes. The Developer has signed the agreement and submitted the appropriate deposit anQ security for the acquisition. This agreement allocates costs and responsibilities towards obtaining said properties. The agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectf submitted, ~~ ~~ ~~_ ./~G ~ ~/%~ Attachment RESOLUTION N0. r~' ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACgUIS1TI0N AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AID) DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13612 FAOM MATT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ~CCAu",.A~.D - STD#E:riTE ANu ~riunIiiNG THE MAYOR AHO CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME NHEREAS, the Developer, Nett Southern California, Incorporated - Stonegate, has subnltted to the City of Rancho Cucasonga tract and taproveaent iocate.. r,o: t„ .. nr~ fnr reYiey ^^dit1A'ied bj Tei,tat; i2 TPatt L36i2, ~ ~ -f Highland Avenue and west of Etlwanda Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucasonga; and NMEREAS, for the Developer to neat the requtresknts established as prerequisite to recording of the final awJp of said developaknt said Developer has offered the Acquisition Agreeoent wbattted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together witA good and sufficient security and deposit. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL ff THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLVES as follaNS: 1. That said Acquisition Agreeabnt be and the saa>e 1s hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Acquisition Agrea~ent on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s suthortzed to atust thereto; and 2. That said Acquisition Agreneent is accepted as good and sufficient, sub3ect to approval as to fora and content thereof by the City Attorney. 3, '""` APO ~~: - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: Fobruary 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer DY: Ni111e Yalbuena, Engineering Technician Sun.iECT: Approrai of a Maintenance Agreemens between iieirick Properties Limited and the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance of an overflow channel along with the replacement and repair of fencing and landscaping within the City Drainage Easement iocated on the southwest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue RECOMIElDATIgI: It is recommended that Lhe City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUNOJANALYSIS Neirick Properties Limited, developer, 1s required to provide the City '"i t~ ^•••••`••••~ s,.. •h. w.+n~.rann. eP •h. ernnPllw nhannel anA iM replacement and repair of fencing and la~scaping within the City drainage easement as part of the condlt+ons of approval for Parcel Map 12504, located on the southrest corner of Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue. Copies of the agreement are available to the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, (~^ ~ RHM:NV: ^ Attachment §; .,: ~.. '~~„ ''ssj..: RESOLUTION N0. 90 _ O T 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MAINTENANCE AGREEINNT NITH YE IR[rl( DRnpiRTTFS ~ twt?FI! F!w PlP+'Fl MAP 12504 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeonga, California, has far its consideration a aaintenanee agreeaent free Nei rick Properties Liwtlted, developer, for the a»intenance of an overflow channel along with the replaceaa!nt and repair of fencing and iandscaping within the City drainage easea~ent and generally located on the southwest corner of Loeita Court and Archibald Avenue; and NHEREAS, the developer has suhnitted the aiaintena~rce agreeiaent as part of the conditions of approval for Parcel Map 12504, NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGJI, HEREBY RESOLVES that said aNlintenance agreea~ent be Hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said aaintenance agreenent on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucaagnge, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ 't... y5_• a 4 A g x O "~ 0 .. n a -~ ~~ m z c m 3- p -~ s J ~~ :~ . . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REFOR,T Date: FeDrua ry i, i9yJ "" To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager From: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Assistant SUOJECT: APPROVAL OF LEASE PURCHASE ABREENENT KITH NUNICI PILL SERVICES GROUP I FOR 0 P TCN UCKS Recoaaw!ndation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Reso ution authorizing the lease/purchase of equipment through Municipal Services Group, Inc. BACR6ROlIND AND ANALYSIS: On January 10, 1990, the City awarded two (2) sphalt Patch Trucks to Dteterich International Truck Sales fora total of (221,399.03. The expected delivery date for these trucks will De June 1990. Because the City desires to purchase the equipment, xhich is budgeted over five years at the most equitable rate, Dteterich International's proposal with Municipal Services Group, Inc. as the financier responded wt th the most Tavu rgUle iui.m eat, taut v~ ,.^" ^"^^^' Following Council action, the City will enter into an agreement with Municipal Services Group, Inc. for the leaseJpurchase of equipment totaling X221,399.03, The agreement will provide for two (2) payments each year for a period of five years commencing in July 1990. Ne will be happy to answer any questions regarding this. Respy s fitted, Jim Hart /f Administrative Services Director Attachment <: 1~fuDIU.'~IdA (J0. qD - D7a R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIIMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEASE/PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT THROUGH MUNICIPAL SERYICES GROUP, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has date rmircd that a true a rd very real need exists for the acqui stion of the equipment described in the Municipal Master Leave and Opliun Agreement No. 4u4 (the "Agreement") presented a this meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City pf Rancho Cucamonga has taken the necessary steps, inclcdi ng any legal 5iddi r.g requireme^.t s, under applicable law to arrange for the acquisition of such equipment, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby directs the City Attorney to review the agreement and negotiate appropriate modiflcati ons to said agreement so as to assure compliance with state law and local statutory law, prior to execution of the agreement by those persons so authorized by the City Council for such purpose, RE 1T RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: Fi nding: Authorized Officers. The terms of said Agreement are in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the acquisition of such equipment and the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga designates and confirms Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager and/or Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director w exew ie auJ uei ire,, and Lu nii,ueaa (w ~ ~ "~'" ~ '"""` L, sP~.. .y. Age ~_ and any related documents necessary to the yconsummation of the ~tran sactions contemplated by the Agreement. RESOLVED, the acquisition of the equipment, under the terms and conditions provided for in the Agreement, is necessary, convenient, in the furtherance of and will at all times be used in connection with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's governmentai and proprietary purposes and functions (except to the extent that subleasing of the equipment is permitted under terms of the Agreement) and are in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and no portion of the equipment will be used directly or indirectly in any trade or business. BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized and directed to fulfill all obligations under the terms of the Nun i'i pa' Ha;tnr Lc,..., an^ ^pti on Agrc e..._.^.t Ho. 454. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of February, 1990. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the 7th of February, 1990 and was adopted at said meeting by the following vote: RYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: N E~ COUNCILMEMBERS: A 5 AI NEB: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABS NT: COUNCILMEMBERS: t ~~ s~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 1990 To: Mayor, Members of the Council and City Manager £rom: Toe Schultz, Community Services Manager '~!~1~' By: Dave Leonard, Parks Proi acts Ceordinatcr " Subject: Authorization to Purchase a Prefabricated Reatroom Building for the Etiwanda High School Sports Field Vpgrade Project RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorize $76,285.00 to purchase a Super Secure Modal MP-1135-G prefabricated restroom building Eros Walt Rankin Associates, the sole source vendor of the building. ~Q~: Per City Council direction, plans and specifications era being developed to upgrade the bell field, soccer field and football field at Etiwanda High School. The project will upgrade the quality of all the fields and provide night lighting to one softball field, one baseball FI nIA -r~pDt:.u 11 ___ r _.._ -.-.-., . w.uu.,.n ~.v,. auu w~u nuuuer overlay. ANALYSIS: To provide after-school hours and weekend use oP the improved lighted sports fields, a restroom building is suggested. , To avoid the lengthy process of construction o! the city standard restroom building, a prefabricated building is recommended. This type of installation will allow the building to ba complatad within the aumaar period when the school is not in session. Staff has been working with Chaftey School District Maintenance and oparatian Pareonnel evaluating the prefabricated restroom building market. Two product lines ware evaluated. Based on mnintananca coneideratlons, the Super Secure installation was prefarrsfl by the School District. J8/DL/kla CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 1990 iu: mayor, Ctty Council and City Manager From: Jim Mart, Administrative Services Director By: Susan Neely_ Fi na nre wa na nne Subject: APPROYAL OF FILM FEF. PERMITS RECOIQSENDgTION• ~'~ ~ucnMq~yn 0 0 F $ Z Ui~ > 1977 I It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution adopting certain fees pertaining to City Ordinance No. 410, Chapter 5.16 Film Permits, Section 5.16.060 Fees. BACK6ROUND• On January 17, 1990, Ordinance No. 410 was amended adding Chapter 5.16 to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to the filming permit process. Section 5.16.060 Fees requires that each applicant, except where exempted by this ordinance, pay a nonrefundable application and lnvestigation fee, provide in advance far the cost of any sheriff or fire protection that may be required and pay the applicable business license tax. The application and invest iga tf on fee has been calculated by the Finance and Planning Departments taking into consideration those individuals who will be processing the applicatf on and their current tabor, fringe and overhead casts resulting in a recommended flat application fee of 599.50 and an investigation fee of 5110.00 per filming day. The Sheriff and Fire Departments have ca iculated current rates based upon the type and length of service required, as follows: Fire Deoartment 5100.00 per hour per piece of equipment (reflects an hour of time for a three man pf ece of equipment) Sheriff Deoartment (26.51 per hour (41.64 per hour 545.78 per hour 550.51 per hour (57.24 per hour Reserve Deputy Deputy Sheriff I Deputy Sheriff Sr. Deputy/Detective Sergeant Staff Report Approval of Film Fee Permits February 1, 1990 Page 2 Sheriff Deoa rtment (continued) E44.05 per hour E48 ,53 per hour E85.00 per day Lieutenant Ca pta i n Vehicle Cost (if needed) The applicable business license tax would be a flat fee of E20,00 under the business license rata gory of entertainment. It should be noted that these fees represent current costs and will require a periodic review by the Finance Department for any amendments at the related costs change. Respectfully submitted, ~_~ .~ .~.` - ,~-c~1 ,lim Hart Administrative Services Director JH/SN/dah attachment ~g ~'. ~~.~ RESOLUTION N0. 90- O (-~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1 TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA A.UTHORI ZI NG CERTAIN FEES AS DEF[NEO IN ORDINANCE N0. 410, CHAPTER 5.16 net r~•-.=. ~c.. Tv iri i. ri LrtifiG Yt Rrili rkUi,'tSS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did amend the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Ordinance No. 410 by adding Chapter 5.16 Film Permits, and NHEREAS, Municipal Ordinance No. 410, Chapter 5.16 Film Permits, Section 5.16.060 Fees requires certain types of fees to be applied, and WHEREAS, current rates for said fees have been established, NON, therefore, be tt resolved that the following fees are established pertaining to Film Permits for the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Business License Tax: § 20.00 Applfcation Fee: 99.50 Investigation Fee: 110.00 per filming day Fire Department: 100.00 per hourR "per hour for each three-man piece of equipment Police Department:** Reserve Deputy § 26.51 per hour Deputy Sheriff I 41.64 per hour Deputy Sheriff II 45.78 per hour Senior Deputy/Dective 50,51 per hour Sergeant 57.24 per hour Lieutenant 44.05 per hour Captain 48.53 per hnur Vehicle Cost 85,00 per day **Number and type of personnel is determined by the sta t!on commander after reviewing plans for the event ~9 ~~, - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: January 25, 3990 T0: City Council n '. PROM: Debra Adams ,F~II'1y~~,.~ c Sty Clerk/Records Manager SUBJECT: DflSItDCSIOIf 0/ CI1T DOCDIQNYS It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy accords liatetl on the stteched form. Under the authority o! Government Code Section 3x090, a departmsn! head may fleetroy certain city records which are two yeere oid under -`•i= "`^-=6= oo +~.+~ _:. aucn aescrncrion ie riret approved by the city yattorney and city council. Also under the sass Government Code Section, authority Se greeted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment :et ~~ J ~>> 050 RESOLUTION N0. 90-+^~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION nr '-T'. nE%uHll~ Anu utx; UMENTS WH1 GH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROYID ED UNDER GOVERNMENT COOE SECTION 34090 WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records under the -`~, y= ,.f :6< f~' ve;ny i.i ty vepar imenis are no longer requlren for puDl tc Dr private purpose s:~ PERSONNEL COMMA LAITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AOM INI STRATI ON PLANNING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of the above- mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, and reduce staff time, expense, and confusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Governmient Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City records and doc omen*.s which are over two years old under his or her charge, without making a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two years old; and WHEREAS, said records have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. S ECTiON t: ~ihat the City Clerk is authorized to allow examination by and donation to the OeparGnent of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of Californ ta, or other historical Society designated by the City Council, any of the records described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, except those deemed to be confidential. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, a t enceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. ~/ DE PAATHENT Personnel D/R PREPARED BYfDP.T° .Tor.:- P,DSSeII sBanr No. Storeroom TITnE oe Aox: Glerk Typist Application & EOE Forms 1983 OEECRIPTION OF CCNTENTB: Clerk Typist Oral Interviews 12-83 Clerj Typist Orai Interviews 6-83 Clerk Typist Oral Interviews 5-82 Clerk Typist Com. Dev, 8-83 Clerk Typist 5-83 Planning Intern 10-83 APPROWD FOR D83TADCTION BY: AEuOLDTiOF Niu. OEPARTI SIT HEAD DATE DESTROYED ~ . AACEYNBRI, CI Y ATTORNRY INSTRUCSIONS FOR RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET DEPARTSIENT Admini Strati On PILE CAB, N0. DRAWER N0. LOCATION PerSOnne1 SNELF CASE N0. SNEIB N0. PACE Wf. 1 nP ~ VINyR PREPARED SY/DATE M, Kuhn 4(1(87 VOLUNE (CU,FT.) INCLOSZVE DATES 1987-1985 SERIES TITLE(S) b DESCRIPTION OF CONTENIS RENABAS: Personnel Policies 1981 Program of 5ervias 1982-83 1983-84 Ouestionnairel5pecs for Classification Study 1980 Recruitments Title ~~ Year Assistant Plmner October 1982 Maintenaice Worker Iovember 1982 MaintenaxY Worker Jon & Sept 1983 Engineering Technician May 1983 1983 ilding Inspector Jura kq WNnt Jens i!. Oct 1983 Associo WiI F...tn... .,une a Jury IY83 AssoeiaM Flamer Sept 8 Nov 1983 AccourM Clerk September 1983 Assistant Planner kpMrnber ~9~ Park Planner November Administrative Arwlya4 December 1983 Assistant Planner May 19 AssociaM Planner Moy 84 Assistant Park Planner March 1985 Associate Civil Fsgineer March 1985 Associate Flamer March 1985 APPRO~ FOR DESTRUCTION BY I DISPOSITION Oi RECOBDS~~-~w i CITY ATTOR`tEY ~+~ ~ p 7~ I b `~ ;~ INSTRUCTIONS FOR RECORDS INVENtORY GORRSHEET OEPAR'[2fENT Administration FILE CAB. N0. DRAWER NO. LOCATION Personnel Office SHELF CASE N0. SHELF N0. :..:... .. ~ .. n'cn PREPARED BY/DATE Mary Kuhn/1-21-37 VOLUME (CU. FT.) INCLUSIVE DATES 1978-1983 SERIES TITLE(S) d DESCRIPTION OP CONTENTS Miscellaneous Files 1980-81 Budget File 507.02 Personnel Training 1982 502.05 Salrny/Benefits Proposals 1980 502.05 Sairny Benefit Survey 1981 Recruitment Ada Account Clerk 1980 Accountant 1980 Administrative Aide 1980 Narnlnl3irailVe Nnaly3l I Ytf.1 Assistant Civil Engineer 1980 Assistant Planner 1979, 80, 81, 82 Associate Civil Fsgineer 1979, 80, 83 Associate Planner 1979, 80, 81, 83 Building Inspector 1981 Buiidirg Technician 1978 Business Lic Inspector 1981 City Planner 1981 Cksrk Typ(aT 1479, 80, 8Z, 83 Junior Plainer 1979 Lifeguard 1982 Mointerance Worker 1980, 81, 82, 83 Pork Maintence Supervisor 1979 Park Planner Plm Checker Police Clerk Public Works Inspector Purchasing Clerk Recreatim Assistant Recreation Leader Engineering Technicim 1983 1983 1979 1980 1980, 82 1981 1981 1981 Secretary 1980, 83 Traffic Alwiysi 1373 APPROV ~D FOR DESTRUCTION BY DISPOSITION OF RECORDS: CIIY ATTOR. Y ~~~-~ 8 ~ I o ~ ~ oEPnnxeD±NT Comnuity Services RETENTION Z Yed rS PA[PNtED BY/DATB Tony Ru«ell/B-IO-89 SRELP NO. $terer00lll T ITLfi OF -ESCRIPTION OP CONT[NT3: Trips & Tours! Special Events 1982-84 Facility Request & Attendance Report 1984 °OR D[STRDC.IDN 8Yt P<. TM[NT HHAD / 7 ARCYYNSRI, CITY ~TTORN.Y R[30LUTION NO. DAT[ D68TROY[D i DEPARTMENT Vd Y1D9$ RETENTION 2-5 Years PREPARED EY/DATE Tony Russell/1-10-90 SNELP NO. Rprnrdc fan4ar TITLE OF DfiSCAIPTION OF CONTENTSt Special Studlea ~q-gS 1141-09 AZCP Siam a Info 1141-09 Architectural Review Process 1143-09 Grandy 83ata Second 0n1ta 1141-09 Home Oecupatlon Permlta 3141-09 Mobile Rome Study 1141-09 Foothill Breeway Study 1180-02 Chamber oP Commerce 1180-02 Community Relations 1206-04 Multi-Modal Tsanaportatlan Study 1302-OL Ftr. n.n.n*,n.n~. n.n._...i 1403-05 SO. Pacific 8uslneae Park (Fontana) 1403-OS Environmental Zmpact Correspondence 3404-09 Public Service/Public Pacllit iea RPP 1503-23 Regional Asaoe. Of Government SCAG, 3anbag 1503-03 NAHRO SS03-03 Weat Hnd Mediation Hoard VEO 9 ION EYs BPARTM6NT iQAD Y ARCYYNSRI, CITY ATTORNiY RESOLOTION NO. OATS OBSTROY60 1600-"1 Parks & Redcreation Facilities 160_-OS Parks & Recreatlon Facilities 360C-02 School Facility 203-04 Mobile Homes SH 1960 203-04 Assisted Housing 704-04 City Attorney Correspondence 82 Budget 82-H3 1141-02 Earthquake Studies 1141-09 Special Studies Ontario Ground Access Study 1111-09 Special Studies Window Signs 1141-09 8queatri Z/Hiking Trails 1141-09 Special Studley Foothill Corridor Study 1141-09 Word Processing Study Various Sign Ordinances 1141-09 Public Notification Procedures 1130-OS Reimbursement Agreements 62 1141-09 Spec3sl Studies Discharge of Plrearms 1170-06 Sewers ..on_.n Cn11R w.a«. o«..A1.. 1180-00 Public Relations C.D. Department E2 1503-01 Local Agency 8ormation Commission 1603-03 West End Mediation Board 1504-01 S.B. County Sphere of Influence LAFC Sphere pf Influence 82 1505-02 Cities: General C D Adminatration FileB 4e 45 203-10 Zoning Violations 203-14 63-H4 ?Sacal Year Wurk Program 204-01 MKOK PSacal Impaet Moflel 204-03 Proposal Computer Program 401-26 Tax Correspond9r^,e/General 402-~05 Hlnck Orante 402-06 Job H111 405-09 Mortgage Revenue Honda 405-OS Hond Information 604-02 Personnel-General H2-83 704-14 State Laws 1002-09 Tracts and Parcels 1110-13 Street Improvements 1141-09 Poothill Community Plan Daily File Cprreaoondenp. & Memos 1-53/12-83 Audit Reports City Seautif icatlon Plan Pre-Budget 78-79 Budget Working 80-81 Budget 91-82 Pre-Budget Papers B2 Pre-Budget Papers B3 Pre-Budget Papers 84 Pre-Budget Papers B5 Pre-Budget Parers B6-87 Codification 79-BO Financial Interest Legal Affairs 79 McSlinq Aff idavite 79 Posting Affidavits 80-83 Pectf inding Committee T9 Proclamatlone 78-BO-81-82-83-ea-86 Property Condemnation 7H-BO W.P. Prooosale NHI ARnTrX MAONA III XEROX CPT 8000 BAVIN ROYAL WANG ZHM DISPLAYWRZTER LEXITRON B2-B3 Mortcaoe Bond Coniracis Market Demand Study Trust Indentures 203-oa U.S. Dept. of HUD 205-01 Quarterly Financial Report 601-02 Agreement J, Doolin BSP BIR 602-01 Agreement MROK-FSecal Impact Model 602-Ci Sedway/COOke-Induetrlal Area 602-OS Agreement-MSI Redevelopment 701-16 Pefleral anfl State Houainp Lsgialation 1170-10 salad Waste Studies Hazardous Waste 1503-01 Local Agency Formation Comm Bond Counsel 82-83 Feasibilty Consultant 82-H3 Ondarwriter 82-83 SB-99 Market Demand Study Financial Advisor CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: kusseil H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: John L. Martin. Associate Civil Engineer e~ . SUBJECT: Approval to establish an amount required of a development as a _ ...~.... ..c n_,e ~ iqe na ct roof cuniriUu ii Ji, ilriicu v .' t: C........ - R_., Widening and Median Islands from west of Interstate 15 to Victoria Park Lane. RECOMMEIMT[oM: It is recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached resolution establishing a funding mechanism and a linear foot rate for contribution by private development on Base Line Road from west of Interstate 15 to Victoria Park Lane. BACK6ROUMD• With the City's desire to provide a functional ma,lor divided roadway along Base Line Road from Interstate 15 to Rochester Avenue, the Ctty has designed a three-phased lmprovemrnt plan for the shove specified limits. Phases I and tI of this Dian. extends n_a from Tntarctafe 16 in wrinnt. v..tr Lgpo aro tier,.,. constructed, Phase III is expected to be under construction in the summer of 1990. ANALYSIS• Due to the City's desire to alevtate traffic conggeeso on and provide functioning arterials, Lhe City has designed and will construct street widening and a raised median on Base Line Road. To offset tha cost incurred by the City, a cost which private development would have been required to bear, it has become necessary to establish a funding mechanism for the construction. The attached resolution establishes a unit amount of 5109.00 per linear foot of property fronting on Base Line Road from west of Interstate 15 to west of Victoria Park Lane and 574.00 for Etiwanda Avenue from Base Line Road to SQO feet north and 660 feet south. These untt costs were established by prorating the total costs associated with street widening, median construction, deisgn and right of way acquisition to the Lota1 property frontages appllwble to Phase I and II pro,(ects. Oue to the physical nature of the project, this method was determined to be the most equitable means of distributing the contribution required of development, (see attached calculations) CCSR February 7, 1990 Page 2 In order to Dest adJust the unit cost to a current year value, the unit cost for contribution will be increased on a fiscal year basis by the Pr1a;e I merest Rate as deteriai ned at the beginning of each fiscal year. Respec u13y su.4mitted, ~~ ~;; r?,-~ %~` '-~ , ,,. RNM:JLM: pam Attachaent ~~ BASE LINE, PWISES I ~ II Cost/Front Foot Design P.D 5916 36,576.22 P.O. 6196 49,701.00 Right-of-NAy Appraisal P.O. 6954 36,000.00 Right-of-Nay Costs var. 234,109 + 212,000 + 13,000 {°°,"3 si~~ street; Plan Check P.O. 7025 7,850.00 P.O. 7026 4,350.00 Eztra 7.0. 7334 3,750.00 Printing 30.17 Laird 11,595.63 Construction Costs 808,900.56 - 98,991.00 • 709,909.50 Linear feet on Base l!ne 6,511.00 Lost/Front Foet • 108.93 109.00/LF Por Base Line I ~: 4. ~`~;, ETINANDA AVENUE 51 de Street - square footage of right-of-way taken SF Total Sf Total S Crawford 6,611.60 18,618.97 74,000.00 .iwi vii o.oiU.eSV 12, OD1.US 44,000.00 Chao 600,00 3,423.56 12,100.00 Total Construction Cost AC = 18,319.88 SF + 41,986 SF = 60,305. v6 SF Cobble Stone Curb Base = 60,305.96 SF C d G PCC ~ 1,166.28 LF 260 LF AC Serve Adiust 1 water valve 65' chain 11nk fence item Mount Unit Pr1ce AC Pavement 2000 Ton 24.00 Cobble Curb 502 LF 31.00 hg Base 2400 Ton 9.00 r~~ wro a uuccer lioa Lr 9.uu AC Berm 260 LF 10.00 AdJust Valve 1 Ea 20.00 Chain Link 65 LF 11.00 Total GRAND TOTAL Linear feet on side streets 300 feet north and 660 feet south •i9204' Cost/Front Foot • =78.92 Say 579.00 for Etiwanda Avenue SS1de Street 26,277.00 24,125.00 2.121.00 S 52,523.00 Total 48,000.00 15,562.00 21,600.00 lu,a9a.uu 2,600.00 20.00 715.00 s 98,991.00 5151,514.00 RESOLUTION NO 9~ - ~5 I A RESOLUTION OF ?HE CITY COUNCIL OF ?HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM;i.i;4, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING qND ADOPTING A COHTR IP.'•fiION AMOUNT PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION Of THe Tini~ L11:E "nw,O :iiCc~I.S PROP! l~S' OF INTERSTATE 1S TO VIGi'ORIA PARK UNE TN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;AONGA WEREAS, ;.he City has collected free properties fronting Base Line Road, fees 1n lieu of construction, bonds for participation in construction and/er lien agreements to participate 1n the construction of Base line Road; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is purchasing rights-of-way and constructing street widening and median islands on Base Line Road from west of Interstate 15 to Victoria Park Lane; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes Lhat it 1s necessary to establish methods to equitably share incurred costs among those benefited by said Improvements, as Ts provided on other mayor divided streets such as Haven Avenue. NON, THEREFgtE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. All fees collected in-lieu of construction for Base Line Road Street Widening and Meddans be deposited to a construction account or fund to be used for the pending Base Line Road Nidening and Median construction. 2. All bonds received from developers guaranteeing perticlpating 1n the construction of Base Line Road Nldening and Medians be called in or otherwise converted to a liquid asset and deposited in a colnstruction account or fund to be used for the pending Base Line Road Widening and Median construction. 3. All lien agreements pertaining to the construction of Base Ltne Road Nidening and Medians be amended to make payment to a carstruction account or fund to be used for the pendln? Base Line Road Widening and Median construction or to retmbcrse °.he City for the Construction Hereof and purchase of rights-of-way therefore. 4. A11 remaining undeveloped properties fronting onto Bse Line Road ^ha~l be required by condition of Development to reimburse the City for Lhe cost for their proportionate frontage of the Ba,e Line Road Nidentng and Median construction and rights-of- way purchase. A contribution in 1!eu of said constrlxtlon and parchase for said widening and median shall be an meouM equal ~S3 l CCSR-Resolution No. Feoruary 7, 1990 Page 2 io 5109.00 per 1l near foot of property fronting on Base Line Road. Corner property frontages shall be measured to the ~rgr ,....,,~~,.,, of rho ul tisate rl aht-of-wav of the 51 de streets: and shalt include the particular improvements constructed with this pro,{ect which are unique to the frontages along Etiwanda Avenue which said street frontage cost is 579.00 per front foot of said street from Base Line Road to 300 feet north and 600 feet south thereof. Payment of said contributions shall be made prior to building permit issuance or recording of the Tract or Parcel Map, whichevar occurs first. The unit contribution amount shall automatically be increased on a fiscal year basis by the Prime Interest Rate as determined at . the beginning of each fiscal year. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: enn s u ayor ATTEST: e ra _... ams, y I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Ranche Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California at a regular meeting of said City Council held an the 7th day of February, 1990. Executed this 7th day of Febrwry, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. e ra ams, y U 1 CI:'Y OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. W_sire, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer Si~a_icrT; EMYIRIN!NFNTAI ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-18 - u a a eso a on con r•1ng a ~i4v ounL 1c 1-d-eciston a~ade on January 17, 1990, for an appeal of Plannfng Caiwission conditions for a fast food restaurant located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Learon and Highland Avenues RECOI~EI~ATIpI: Staff recaawends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On January 17, 1990, the C1ty Council heard the applicant's appeal of the Conditions of Approval requiring the paynent of current in-Neu fees for and the construction of portions of the Haven Avenue nedlan island fronting the property. The attached reselUL100 retleCLS Ltle GITy CWnCII's 0eClsion W deny LiR appeal. Rasp f sudaitted, l ~~._~= /~ ~ ~~ `~ R K:sd Attzchaient 3~ ,t r RESDf.UTTON Iq. 89-119 A RESOLUTtON OF 1HE RAfCHO CUCM016A PLAHNI N6 COIMISSION APPROVI N6 COtD ITIONaL USE PERMIT 88-18 FOR THE OEVELOaMENT OF A F.°._~ FOOD RESTAURANT TOTALING 5,180 Sq UARE FEET ON 1.2a ACRES OF LANG ON THE EAST SIOE OF HAVEN AVENUE BE111EEN L@qN 1D9 Nlnxr_un aw:rarFc tN tut NEIGNB]RHOOD COMIERC IAL 0[STR ICT, MID NpC IN6 FIND IN65 IN SU PPCRT 1H ER EOF - APN: 201-271-66 ANJ 67. F. Recitals. {ij Diversified Properties Corp arty III has filed an aDPlicat ion for Cob itional Dse Permit 88-18 as described 1n the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the wb~ect request is referred to as "the app 1 scat 1m". (17) On the 29th of Noveaber 1989, the Planning Conteisslon of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamnga condtcted a fitly noticed pr6lic hearing on the application and concluded said Nearing an that date. (iii) Atl 1e9a1 Drcrcqutsttes prior to the adoption of this Resolution have acalrred. B. Resolution, NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and rcsoived by the Planntrq Commission of CM Ctty of Ranch Cucamnga as follows: oa ijrsi(~~•uy nods snas err or the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based updt wbstantial evidence presented to this Coap1s 5100 dtring the above-referenced prbitc heartrq on Nowsher 29, 1989, trrludlrg written and onl staff reports, together with p>dlic testimny, this Commission Newby specifically finds as hilows: side of Hewn Miele betm~nllamsnoand Hlghlard Awnwstptth ahstnet frontage of 224 heL aid lot depth of 210 het and >z pnserttty vatartt; and (b) The property to tM north of 1dM srtD~aet sits is single family ns/daNtttal, tM property t9 tM south h recant, the property >n the east is auiti-family resiGMlaT, and tM property to tM west is vaunt. 3. Based upon the wbstantUi w/dente pnseMed Lo this Comtatssion Otrirg the above-rehrrneed ptL11c Mer1Ag and rpon the specific itndirgs of bets set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this ColamisalOn Mreby f1Ms and corclttdes es folloMS: ~/ 67DlIBIT "A" a RAnnlna co1e175slon Aesotanon no. a9-la9 aP ea-le - olvelsLPl® cnopeines caPAAr nl Noveaber 29, 1989 Page 2 (a) The propoxd use is in accord with the Ce neral Plan, the abject Ives of Lhe Deve lapaent Cade, and the purposes of the district in which the site 1s located. iii The propoxa use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to Lhe piblfc nealrn, xfety, or welfare, or materially fn,turtous to properties or ingroveaents in Lhe vicinity. .~ ^^ ~ (c) The proposed use coapltes with each of the applicable ,...: .,..._ ... tie kvelOpae rat lade. 4. This Cosaaission hereby finds and certifies that the pro,lect has been reviewed and considered in cospitance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this fonanisston hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings aN conclusions xt forth to pars}rants 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Caawtssian hereby approves tAe appiication sub,iect t0 each and every condition uL forth oeiow and ir. :he attached standard Cord itlons, attached he rate a1d incorporated herein by this Rferancl. Plannim Oiv 151an: 1. The suD~ect restaurant and mated ngrovelnts be canstrocted a1d wtntained 1n canforagnee Ntth tAe plans as approved by the Planning Coeaatsston on Nnw,w~~• 70 10Ne 2. The use sAaii be operated in a sanner rAlich does not intarfera w1tA Lila rormel us. of the ad,lotning properties. If, in the opinion of the City Planner, this provision is being violated, the violations shalt be grounds for roopening the Conditional Usa Permit hearings ant adding emdltions to control C1e violation. 3. Na1sa levels aaasurad at tAe property line shall not quad d1e Level of bekgrould none nora~lty found in the anon. ~. The pnw,isas shall Oe kept elaan and the operator shtil uke all reasonable efforts to su that na trasA or litter ortginating frog n1e use is deposited on d~atent properties. Trash eantatners, as dahnetnad by the City Planner, shall be required and egliyees shall be raqutnd daily to pick W trash or litter orgpinatllg free the ,ip upon ilia site and Nithin 3gb rue of tAe ptriaatter of the property. ~~ i ~: BANNING CCiiNISSION RESOLUTION N0. gg_149 CUP 88-18 - O1 vERSlFlED PNO PER TIES COMPANr [[1 NovMber 29, 1989 Page 3 5. All graffttf shall be removed within 72 hau rs. 6. All parking lot madiftcat tons and re-str lying within thfs shopping center shall be cenpleted pr for w accupanq. 7. Prior to iswarce of any permits, the site plan shall be revised to incorporate all of the revised parking calcu tattoos corresponding W modifications of the internal circa tat ton and that the site plan fndlcate extsttrg and futuK parkfng corre spoMirg to the parking study. 8. Final plans for the patio including outdoor furniture shall 6e reviewed and approved by staff prior to the iswance of arty permits. 9. Enriched pavirg/pedestrlan crosswelks shald be shown at the northerly 'T' tntarsection to make an east-west and a north-south 'onnactlon Cross the driveways, ~ connecting tree sidewalk at the northeast corner of the subject stta with tM southeast corner of the proposed eomrrrotat pa;i. 10. Plans for all proposed erfrtched pavtng/padestrian crosswalks shall be reviewed, and approved by staff prior to the tswanca of any parwtts. ~ ~ fanus shell be crosswalks, Datto, Mils, and roviawed and approved by staff prior to the lswance of Dulldtng permits. 12. This approval is granted cmtlrngent upon the appltarrt's dbtitntng approval fray Wdcy Stores of the paging lot conftguntlon shorn In ExMbtt 'A• attached Mato; Mwever, should the applicant not raeatve approval tram Wdty Stores, the appiiant shalt propose aiternattve parking lot seharaes far approval by the Msign Review fawltpe prior to iswance of butldtrg permits. Ergtneertro 01vis1en• 1. M in-11eu ha for one half the cost of eenstruet/ng tM extstlrg Raven Awnw madtan shall ba paid to LM Ctty prior to th! tasuame of building permits. The for shalt be the City's currently adap4d unit count for Phase 9 times the krgth tram a prolotgatlon of tlfa Comore Awrue south rtght~of~rray line to tM angrllna of Me southerly drtvewy on Hawn Awrum. ~~ PLANNING COlMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-149 CUP 88-18 - OI YERSI FI EO PROPERTIES COMPANT III Novewber 29, 1989 Page 4 2. Construct the Haven Avenue median south of the Sather ly dr tvewgy no further than H1gh1aM Avenue. The developer shall be eligible for ".. l.:wr:iwt~~. u( wn: iiol~ Lim Lasc of GOn SLNCL 70n froe future developeent on the west side of Haven Avenue. In the event that construct ion of this portion of the nedtan becanes a City pro sect, the deve lopcr Shall Dart lc spate in fuMieg one-half t~.. ~.n /.'e met. 3. Cony lete street taprovements on the east side of Haven Aveme frde the project lath ba Mary tb HighlaM Avenue, including orbs, gutter, street tights, AC paveneM, and orb-ad~icent sidewa iK. 4. Reconstruct the southerly drive approach on Haven Avenue aM the drive aisle along the project Barth boundary as follows: (a) A design generally in conforarnce with the peeliainary design shown on the approved site plan shall be approved Dy the City Englneer and Kr itten ag reearnt obtained iron Unoui prior to the /sauance of building penaits. (D) If atraaeent iroe Unocal 1s not abtalnad, the pro,lect shall b• ndasigned to xcosarodate fnrr4 LMI11r by rlAwnim nn trv mrlh elA~ of the existing dr/ve aisle to the satisfettan of the Ctty Engineer. 5. Parkrwy aM landxaptng teprovea~nts along Naven Avenra shall tanforw to the results of the Haven Avenue beautlficatton study. 6. The Secretary >b this Wewisston shall certify to the adapt/on of this Wwlution. APIRDYED Alq ADPiED TN15 29TH DAY OF RDYEM6ER, 1969. PLANNING Cy~IISSIDN OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMOIMiA BY ~f PLANNING COWISSION RE9JLUTION N0. 89-1~9 CUP 88-18 - O[YERSI PI BD PROP9l7I E5 COMPANI IIS Novaabar 29, 1989 Page 5 I, Brad Duller, Secretary of the Plaiming Coewission of the Ctty o9 Rancho Cu caeiorga, do hereby Certify that the foregolrg Re so lut ton Mss dr ly and regularly lntrodo cad. passed, srd dm_L.A by the Pia ~ 7ry w.~. Hsfan a£ L'ne City of Ra ntho Cuwanrga, at a regular iaeettng of the Plannt~g Coautsston held on the 29th dAy of Novaeb er, 19D9, by the following vote-to~it: AYES: COMIISSION ER S: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA. MCNIEL. TOLSTOY, wEINBERGER }nrc. rnNNl~ttONERS? 9QNE ABSENT: COIMISSIONERS: NONE ~~ ,•~„ Li td ~.~ :;. {j~~l=~~_~jj ij~da~ds!~! ?~ d~Y d3a~ sd,rS- t~~ts;-€Y_3~ ~:3?Y ~1r1 ~1'aL9.=tj'~1 =33` ''~ 1r3~ :i~~.ni ~~-t-Y-Y'~~t _. °~=~y~.;j~3~ k~_s1~~s~E"si'a n~~ ;p t a~= s€ s, i ~ ~; t~ ~1' ~ ~d=: ~,l i3 3°s~a i~r 3 s~'$ i.5 ~• s :3i aj ~3ta3 +~~ ~~Fsx -=s~'s tsa ~:~ ~s{ ~~~Yt _i ! ti~3~ ~~: a ~. Yy 3s= s_~~s I;s y di~~# ~~d ~ ~~ ~lg~_ dpdd a$a ~~~,~ :.Y ~~~~ _"s°~ ,-d +~ ~t~d~ iFd i(~y~d~a~ i~3t z3t.ji 3°' ~:;~ ~'i~~ ~~~~~~ #~ l~~.°, ~~ °~ t ~~ . e ~~ i d ~ tea '~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~~ s~ . ti ~ ~ ...s t ~~ ~~ ! p~i ~ - ~~ ~i~ = d~l ~ f dd id- d ~ 'i !! !a~ ~ 5 !~ t;!' ~~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~lj~ ~~ "~ i~ i i ~~ ~~~ E i Y ~!°~E iE ~ N 1 i _: di:ir3 ~r~ ~~ ~~r~~~ ~E~ ~r~~° ~ ~~~¢~ r r°E~ r or 7 :: ~E~tE ~t ~ E r~ '° E~--- ~E ~~EF i~ ~tgE ~; E .°-~ E Ss'~ s~ ;~ Il pa =~ ar~~jt i !tE }~ f~EE `- t~~ 3 ~E ~~~ ~ ¢ri r Ft a+~ a E-E !E ~s ~~E: ~ ~Er f! a_s~ E Ec i M !~ ~; =~ tlt~ iE:_C E~ ~ s~F : ~~~ ~St~ Rs , t: gr~ rsr [s1~ t3 !tr ~x~ ~E i ~~ a sS ~~E ~! ~Q ~s~ s~~ [E ~ ~ir ~~ ~E r~~ `~ ~~F ~: .:r ~. SiS: 7r. ![7Z~ i~~~ ~~~ ~f~~T == it ~.g ~i~- 4 ~_~ s r~i r ~`~Se ~tt n3 l~+tlt •~- ~ r. is rg t~d E` x~a; E~~ Ea EFt~ Fa-E ii ~l~E E ~~[[6i6ir~35CCi4[ (~~~t }~ge - ~ y ^ - ~;a~t~l ~`tR i~RS~~ QjCfi _ ~~~~~~~~C e~Sp~ ~~Sj i! E -'r 0 4r. ~ E rs i ~E• t~-~-t ~f~•3 ~~~~ E »i~`ttwf~ ~li~ :r R~~€Erpi ~+~ ~~i3 R=~E i ~EcF~ 1~3p; ~~ r ~t=tit- ~ e~ ~ ~~-~~Ei(i ~~}~ rE~a i Rlff- vtgF ~, i (rtt t ~~g`~t~l~ ~~~i I~~r ~~ ++ti O a li:k ~k f / yy i~kkf_d ~!' f JE t~ t k~ ~g~i iz $ ss ~_ ~~afi~i~iiyl~ 3-~~~ ~ !~~•~ ~ ~'t'-a = I s~ Gsf 'itlli~}it~ !~~~~ a = ss M j _SE Yp Y~" = =w~ 1A a~JS"=~ r _*i= fj =f3 1'Yfk ~" k '~ ~ -~ ~~ ~~~ to ~ a3 ~~_~ =xis i-',! ~p 3?'; !~ :f ~?tFk~~~J a~~aa a= t,°~ ~'~~~ ~~ Ill ~~~ ~~i tt;'=~,.~~~ }~ ~ ~~ ;~~;~ sxEs~ :~~ :~ s:s ~~! 's~~~~~~it}~~ a3~~c as ~i3i~ =s sit ae :~ ! o };ar :~ f!t piE3 rsa f's ~~ ~ ~y F~ i s i ±~_ il~~ 1 ~' ~~ g ~ ~a tai et1t~- ~.~ ~f?~ ~ t~ ~a t ~ ls~~ a~ i~t~ ss~~~ ?~ ~~~~ 1 y~ ~~ jt ~s lt~Y ~a~~~ z i~' 1• ;'~ i tai to : ac ~~t ~: ~ ~~ d~ : = tts Et~t~ ~~~; ~~~~ ~ fit! ;tt ~ i~ ~~~ ~! as l:s~i~t =<edt SE~i ~ 6~~ t~~ 6a 'ai /s~~~.is~ i~~~ a~~i3~a! +I ~I~ ~ ~ ~i t MI +I ~I ~,~ n I~I`_ ~ I ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ is *~` ~~sa t~~ z ~' ~; ! SiE ~ ~ll~ =i~! ~er s~ i~~! ~j~~ ~ [ Sj +3~1t fi~; s! ~~ Eis °~ ~~ i s3E =` E '~i r"E E ~g~ ~ S ~1~ i... a ai. r f _ r S ! ~ r ~ Ra ~C.f I t fz '~~ F ~~3~~ ~~~~~ ~E t ga ; 3~;~t P'iE ^s~~ i ~y 3 er"~~` iaal~` ~~€i a E3 s s~dal ~~~°~ iffE ~ _r dj = Exa°-~ ire`{ ~_~& ~€ : ~~~ ~~~E3 3~~~ e ~~~~ irpa~~ ~~~~ a_ ~'~s !' Eke a E ii putt L~~~i E~ ' q4 I ~ ~ ~ I` I~ ~ E E lE ii ~ j jj ~~i ~~~ :E~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E g~ ~'1 E I~ ~ j i j a~i ;~s ~ s£ ~ a ~- ~ I. s~ ~~~~ IEEi ai~E '\ ~~a ~E_~~ ~~~y ~~~3 a~~ ~=~E `?~~ `~a ' a •ggs ~a= +=EF ~i~ ~xg E 3EEEa '~~ ~s ~~~E ~Sa =;~ ;. E.• ':F Eag e~~E E ~ ~+~' ~£ sa~~ r ~Ea ~~~ rE ~ sd~ ~i~ Et Es~~ i~~ sEE a 6 ;si t~/sYij t ~ I r iir F ~Yy ~~1== ~~~ _ ~ d ~~3g i _~ i -S_ M~__i~ -'S ~3 a ~ k s p t ; Y E_ k=r? ~ri a~ a 31~~ ~ '~ ~. a y"t~~i ~ ~'i s -r'e~i 'air! t= ~ Y ii5~ '<~~!`a~i~ s ~ rr.. i~p rai yp7Y jj~ iyy.. ~~(~~ Fl Ji 9w i~ E~ ~i i~ yD ^I ~I ~I •~ rI .I ^I ~Y ii L a~ ~i 5 it 'ct i i ~~ ~~ ; .s Y~ ~i ~; ~; ,~ ~~ ~~ ~t a,~;yi :~ as '~ ~~ ~~ +~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ a s_~ .~i 1r ~ll~ ~~ r ~ rllt i3~ ~ till s! ~ ; i~~1 ~,~~ i Y ! ; ~ ~3s~ ii3l s :~~ s t a3 ~~~~~ ~i ~ ~ ~s~': ~ r~ ~I~ ~I ~ JI 9s V ~I ~I ~I ~I a ~ '`^\ ~` w ~ ! `~R(~ i ±i d`_~~ ~~i ~se 63 i Ei" jsf [ ~ ~~ s f s e~~;_ eft tEs '~ ~'"i~E :Ea ;fit R R ~ ~ E~R R, Q. O ti ~t EE"'! j~E :I ~~ ~~`~ ~h ~~~ ~E E~~E ~~! i~ s stca~i ~~ ~: Fi ~(~~ ~~- ~~ cf 'Farr tE if I. I~ 3' E'""~ 3~ ~_~~ s ~^ ~~ •s: ~~ ~f~gg '~ 3~i xE j3 E'i. ~i E~g r- ~a i ~f. ~~ t~¢^i Cf QR3 I_ I. 3 S p E ~ fi [ ~ R'_~ _'- S ]f f i S~ ` E ':i :~ =i if I x I ~ I I ~ _ ~ r i~ E ~ a tae c i r t .; i5 ~ ~ ss ~ ~~ s ~ ~ ` i ;R ~~ ~ es sif E ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! i f ~ £ c.~ t I F g ~s ~ F ~~ r I :\ r\ f> s~ ~~ R ~tE~ •_ fi ~t bf ~~ ' f ..~ i ~} as E rE Q E } T ~~ ~ i r s ~ I s `!a : t t 9b 1~~ I~ I_ IF c~ ~~ gEs *f :° ~!!~ aFa t i~ ~" ~s! ; P: ~:~ ~_ ~~ sEsE iE ~j ~ ~'3 iii ag f ~~~ ~~ ~ iii E[ cE a c~P i~ f E., q re ~~ R a c ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ tffa~ f f ~~ i a Yg=~' -EF: ^E~~E ~~i i~E f iE r E ~~Ef E q @~ ~~~ Q~f ~f E i~~~ 1 ~~ 0 `'I 0 i~ ~ 3! F; i5 ~~~ ~~ ss6 s_r -e _= ~-`3 ~'~ 3"~ .~~ f ~ '" i~ 4 s"~ ss I I ~~t :_ ~~ ~ ~ 4i' :: i s-~ _'~ g3. ~-- -~ -~a :f~ a~f :3y ie3 .I ~I S ~ _~ ~ ~~s_ ;~ ''~~ a~'~ ~~;'i ~~ ~~~j t~ ~'~l ~'_.~~~ ~' ~•~ ~~ rt we~ i s-i ~~b/~ jl ars ~ ge ~ 3F~ ! !~~ My ~ ~~~ i y 3~ ~j ~ I } •' s~, $ ~~~ i 'j~ ~ ~y~y~~ ~. ~~ ~~ 'siss ~ rii ~ ~~ ~~ 1 .s ~ ~3~ i$ ^~ it ~I ~ yn / l r s C t s { "e ~ ~i ; ~. . i~ :, ~. ii=~ ~~ i .\~f 1 ~ i f ! €,~ ~~ ~~ s=~ ~~~ ds !s; iY~ si ;1 i3~ _~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ,_ r ~ it ~I ~I ResoLUrloN Na. 90- oSc}- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPRDVlN6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-18 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT of A FAST FDOD RESTAURANT TOTALING 5,180 SQUARE FEET ON 1.24 ACRES OF LAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETUEEN LEMDN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES IN THE HEIGH80RH000 CONNERCIAL DISTRICT, AND lMKIN6 FINDINGS :!! SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 201-271-66 AND 67 A. Recisais. (1) Diversified Properties Cawpany III has filed an application for Conditional Use Perwit 88-58 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,{ect request is referred to as "the application". iii) Cn the 29th of November 1989, the Planning Coaaaission of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application following the conclusion of said hearing adopted their Resolution No. 89-149 approving Conditional Use Perwit 88-18. (iii) Diversified Shopping Centers filed a ttawly appeal of the Conditional Use Perwlt approval represented Tn said Resolution No. 89-149 on the basis of two (2) conditions contatned to said Resolution. The conditions appealed are described as follows: a. An 1n-lieu fee for one half fire cost of constructing the existing Haven Avenue etedian (Engineering Division Special Condition No. 1). b. Construct the Haven Avenue aatdian south of the southerly driveway (Engineering Special Condition No. 2). Itv) On January 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the sub,{ect matter of the appeal of the Conditional Use Perwii end, on said date, concluded the public hearing. (v) A11 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, 8. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is found, deterrined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga as follows: 1. This Council hereby sDecif1ca11y finds that all of the facts set forth 1n the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. C[TY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. CUP 88-18 FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 2 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the proleCt has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envlrormrental dual lfv Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of rb ,.~~~.._~_g~ u._~._.~... Declaration issued on November 29, 1989. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to tM s Council during the above-referenced January 17, 1990, hearing, incle^_ing written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced November 29, 1989, Planning Comeiss7on meetL-,g a ~. uie wr,tents of 'rianning Caemission nesoiuiion No. 89- 149, this Council specifically finds as foilows: a. The Conditional Use Penit applies to property located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland Avenues within the Neighborhood Commercial District; b. The properties surrounding the subject site have the following land use designations and are developed as noted: North: Single Family Homes; Low Residential District South: Vacant; future I-30 Freeway and Low Residential District East: Apartments; Medlrs-High Residential District weer Vaunt rnnMwl nt,ewe Cbnnnl nn re.ee. nse~..,. Professional, Law-Medium Residential District and Neighborhood Comaerclal c. The Conditional Use Permit conteaglates the development of a fast food restaurant. The proposed use is to accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purpose of the Neighbor Commercial District; d. The Development as specified will rwt contradict the goals of objectives of the General Plan or Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and would rat promote a detrimental condition t0 the persons and properties in the imaediate vicinity of the site; and e. The requirements 9f Planning Gemeission Resolution Ho. 89-144 (Condition No. 1 - Engineering Division), payment of current in- lieu fees for the cost of construction of the existing Haven Avenue Median, and (Condition No. 2 - Engineering Division) the construction of the Haven median island from the project's southerly driveway remain important and necessary conditions. ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. cuP ae-1a FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 3 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Conditional Use Perveit is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga; b. The ae"sign Or iaprv~enients of 'she Ci,nui Eiundi Use Permit arc consistent with the General Plan and Developaent Cade of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; c. The subJect site 1s physically suitable for the type of development proposed; d. The design of the proposed Development is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable intury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; e. The Development is rat likely to cause serious health problems; and f. The design of the Development will not conflict with arty easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88-18, subJect to all the Conditions set forth in Planning Caimaisslon Resolution No. 89-149 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit 'A"). 6. This Council hereby provides notice t0 Diversified Shopping Centers that the time within which ,iudictai review of tYR decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of the California Code of Civ11 Procedure Section 1904.6. 7. The City Clerk 1s hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Diversified Shopping Centers at their address as per City records. ~QO :s -_r. RE4IUTION N0, 89-149 A RENLUT[ON OF THE RANCHO CUCp70IGA PLANNING COIMISSION APPROVING Cola ITIO NAL USE PERMIT 88-19 FOR THE OEVELO R4ENT OF A FAST F000 RESTWJR MIT 10 TALI NG 5,180 9.1UARE FEET ON 1.24 ACRES CF LAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVEfaIE BE171EEN LEMON AND HIGHLAfO AVEMIES IN THE NFt r,HIfIRHnnn rnra/rnrry ".•- -- nnu nMC ING FINDINGS IN SU PPCRT TH kA EOF - ApN: 201--27t-66 Afa 67. A. Retitais. (i; Diversified Properties Company III has filed an application for Cond ltional Use Permit 89-18 as described in the tit to of this Re so tut ion. Hereinafter fn this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "tne app 1 Scat ion". !i+? Cn the 29th of Ncvemb er 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rars:ho Cu canarga con dtc Led a di ly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on Shat da4. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adaptlon of tots Re so to Lion have scarred. 8. Resolution. ICw, TH FRffOR E, it is hereby fou rd, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the C1ty of 0.anclro Cucamonga as fol lows: 1. Th ie Glmmleeinn h~.~hy e„r ls~~~1... e~_~. ... . .. facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution mare ,true and correct. 2. Baxd man substantial evidence prexnted to this Commission dining the above-referenced public hearing on Novenber 29, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission nerrDy spectfialty finds as follows: side of Haven Averaiie bTMefweenlLemwioandaMlghlard Avpenues with at5ireet frontage of 225 feet and tot depth of 2q0 feet grid 1s prexnt ly vacant; and (b) 117e property to the nortA of the s~b~ect sih is single family residential, the property to the sautA 1s vacant, the property >p the east is mtlti-famtTy residential, and the property W the west is vacant. 3. Baxd upon the wbstantial evidence prexnted to this Commission dining the above-referenced piDlic hearing and ipon the specific firMings of facts xt forth in pangnphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: EXHIBIT "A" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. d9-149 Q1P BB-18 - DI VERSIFlED PRO PQt TIES COMPANf III Nove~er 29, 1989 Page 2 (a) The proposed use is in accord with the G°reral Plan, the objectives of the Deva lopment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site fs located. thereto, will notbbe detrf mentaldtwthe op~lic health hesa fetyt iorswelfare~or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) The proposed use compiles with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in conplfance with the CaNfornia Envirnnire ntal Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Commission hereby iswes a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and corrclustons set forth in pa ra~raphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the ap plicatton subject to each and every Condit ton set forth below and in the attached Sta Hard Cord itians, attshed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannirg Division: 1. The wbject restaurant and related improvements be constructed and mnintalned in conformance with the plans as approved by the Planning Commission nn nove~er 29, 1989. 2. The use shall be operated in a manner which does not interfere with the normal use of the adjoinlm properties. If, in the op in ton of the Ctty Planner, this provision is being violated, the violations shall be grounds for reopening the CoMitional use Permit hearings and adding conditions to control the violation. 3. Noise levels measured at the property iine shall not exceed the level of background noise normally fa rd 1n the area. 4. The premises shalt 6e kept clean and the operator shall make al i reasonable efforts to see that no trash or litter originating from the use is deposited on adjacent properties. Trash containers, as determined by the City Planner, shall be required and enployces shall be required daily to pick up trash or litter originating from the site upon the site and within 306 feet of the perimeter of the property. PLANNING CQMMISS[ON RESOLUTION N0. 89-149 CUP 88-18 -DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES COMPANY III Novenber 29, 1989 Page 3 5. All graffiti shall be re m>ved within 72 ha rs. 6. All parking lot modifications and re-stn ipirg w,cmn crass snapping center shah be co~pieteo prior to occupancy. 7. Prior to iswance of any permits, the site plan shall he revised to incorporate all of the revised parking calculations corresponding to madiffcattons of the internal circulation and that the site plan indicate existing aM future parking corresponding to the parking study. 8. Final plans for the patio including outdoor furniture shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the iswance of any permits. 9. Enriched paving/pedestrian crosswalks should be shown at the northerly "T" intersection to make an east-west and a north-south Connection across the driveways, connec tirg the sidewalk at the northeast corner of the sub,lect site with the southeast corner of the proposed commercial pad. 10. Plans for alt proposed enriched paving/pedestrian crosswalks shall be reviewed, and approved by staff prior to the issuance of any permits. 11. Sairyles of the constructfon materials for the crosswalks, patio, walls, and fences shalt be reviewed and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. This approval fs granted contingent upon the applicant's obtaining approval from Lucky Stores of the parking lot configuration shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto: however, skald the applicant not receive approval from Lucky Stores, the applicant shall propose alternative parking lot schemes for approval by the Design Review Commfttee prior to issuance of building permits. Erg sneering Division: 1. An in-tfeu fee for one half the cost of constructing the existing Naven Avenue median shall be paid to the Ctty prior to the tswance of building permits. The fee shall be the City's currently adopted unit anount for Phase 3 times the length from a prolongation of the Lemon Avenue south right-of-way itne to the centerline of the satherly drtvewa~y on Maven Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-149 CUP 88-18 -DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES COMPANY IiI Novellber 29, 1989 Page 4 2. Construct the Haven Avenue median south of the scutherly driveway no further than Highland e. A....nlnnn.. eA .II Ho nl:n iA In in. ~reimburse~nent~of-one half the cost of construction from future development on the west side of Haven Avenue. In the event that construction of this portion of the median bec ones a City grojec t, the developer shall participate in fu rdirg one-half i're pro Sect casE. 3. Complete street improve~rents on the east side of Haven Rvenue from the project sa th hardary to Highland Avenue, including curbs, gutter, street lights, AC pavement, and art-adjacent sidewalk. 4. Reconstruct the southerly drive approach on Haven Avenue and the drive aisle along the project lath boundary as follows: (a) A design generally in conformance with the preliminary design shown on the approved site plan shall be approved by the City Eng Sneer and written agreement obtained from Unocal prior to the Issuance of building permits. (b) If agreement frga Unocal is noL obtained, the orotect shall be redesigned to accommodate truck traffic by widening on the north side of the existing drive aisle to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Parkway and landscaping i~irovements along Haven Avenue shall conform to the results of the Haven Avenue beautification study. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED TH15 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1989. PLANNING CC~I[SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR BY ATTEST: PIANNTNG CQMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-149 CUP 88-18 - DIVERSIFI~ iitOPERTIES CUIPANY 1[I Novenb er 29, 1989 Page 5 I, Brad 8ulle r, Secretary of the Piann ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cu camorga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Re so lutfon was di ly and reaula rlv intmAn rnA na<ceA a.rl ~.1mrod 6.. ~+.+ m.-..+.~ r.....+-.+..~ of •,.,. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 29th day of Nove~er, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CONM(SSION ER S: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, NCNIEI, TOLSTCY> 4EINBERBER N'1F0 fnMMTfCin NR9 c. ABSENT: COM4ISSIONER S: NONE ~~~,-; ;~. ~, ;A z° W nfiyn_a~a^a f=5€~s:;~~p~ e'e ,... ~~~~`~k xE.S ~ir_ =i. SS ? c...SE?°C9 ~~ a~ ~8 !4 x ~SY$ ~`8 .:ga ~~~~ a: 5.~3 ~~5~ F:L3 "sg^~ =x 3x~=i e3^ a's~s s a ~f x~ yy ~,;t ~~'ea Ea 2~ ~ 8 7t ~ ~Y 5°g~ i~ .~ Fp ~~~ 3 ~3i~s F~ ~sa'a i~_ l~+s ~ xaFyr _sE~ .E~~§= a8~ LaE~ s ~e.g3 ~~~ gSE ES EsY y~:1~t ~ Y~ „os cCt `e ~i~C 8iS~ `~ ~'~~,E ys~ sip~~~ fit! ~gL3.: Sg bJ3 _s Y° da a3 3~3 3 :~a e~iE~A i s ~ ~ ~ a~. a e 3~ IE I $ s€' I ! ' a " ~ 3 5i ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s ~- s ~~ ~~ rs ~4 - i S- ~ ~~ a P s- -i ! ~ #~ t s € ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~i g :_ , ~ " m ~ ' " ~~ ! ~ i i ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~~ ~=s'a£ '$g~££ is ~stsi ^e !EM a^a= s•_. E£= s > y~~~tts^ ~:~-§ ~~_..~~' =a aid _~~ x =~'_i ~=a ~ ~3? E~~£s^ agge_~'"~ .~E~~£l~g~ ~s ~Q~ l~o~ e£ i_a •a%ge <g=a g 3a g` $~1a~~3~g E =~asE.~ gcs €n ;;;~ °~ ass rei a ~sssss i !i` ~a :~= ss° i Rfsz^x xERy'~E=~^ [; ~ `e~ a:~ g~ 3;e ~~ s ~ _ a1~ >s~ sE ~~i =£~ ~£ ss swy; ~~~» ~!!~~ Ee~a=ea= Ie j~~ Yea "xtE v$ antis °s~s»g ~_~~ ;E- s?s£$ ~^ sg `a~ a~P _$ six ~""~° dies . ~;~ ~ S1= s% ae ~ee fsa ~_ a. Ray's ss_y~° ~ ~ ~~lSs e= `£ s3= -S~ £g ~qsY e%^E~ ee_~E i~ !£ Es? 3, ;3- sxy xn c:~£ e ~` ~~ ' ~;Ee =»"E s~~; ~=s s an $a~ %fe s~ y~eR "~"si ~~~ii ;use;a a ~ e~s sa $a e:e~ >,.%e .:£,££ ~~lxEc.~>i ~ _cy acg 3~ 34se N p ~ ~ I ~aa s=Y"° s s€~d eded a=~ !f~i =i~yR ~~ "~ co==Y aq ~YaxE ~g ;~'sj ~%YAa~ E sc~~~R2~4~ ;tcE~ 3~"" €- j~%E se $~-# ry"~°=gi ~~i^sgl3~s ~~gga ,g'g~~S ye £xzs ~~ a~ ~=~'s~s'.~ ~Y~£$'~$a3 YyPe~ vex. s~"- ,R - i E ~EE~~,A~e ~~ysxes$ ~3Ra3 ~sRE s £ ,ia^° 3" 1~ ,EAR s ~~ ~" "~Es x'gJtge~: s"- ~Rs a; ~a% z :~+. 'E sR~-a-Egg 3sa~ asy! _E ~~, ~ wsz ~ yg~s~ Es"~ "e- a i ~- s ga ad-i~ yRi=~~_ cggg ~t;'!~ ca~s ~a x L ~~~: - jEs E~xgiE ~isl~y~~i is=~ esc ,y% aRs+t E ~iEr r3~r°& °a?ce xs :8!$ z~%sc N r~ ya:a rr a gF ge saatsSM~;-s =r~rg a 7 ~~ ~~a: ax ~ as gr €~es a;~gyl i-F"5 s `.~9e o ~'i;s ~~ ~ a3 ee `E~~~"se Fss~ ~ s~; = sg -5"5? E ~ =s ~i "sa i~>?"ses' -~'F x 5 ~~`a -wl ~" E~ E ~ a"g ~..fi 5 ;fd e~ _°SFFys_;.e "s.~~: _,; _°~x ~ -'°~'do ,"`, e~ E° A _a:e^e_~o~oy nr5 g_ ~$ F„E~ x i~ ¢ ^~3~. $gS~ a ~g s'gI ~~ fig! <~ E~~~~~a3ge ~'~€:e x~ ~s~ ~ ~- -'S= .I°„' . OEcs ~se .~~$a3gzs$a ggxys g4 o~ac .II~ zx _~~ _w s;r E: a's~x-5~'3"a Eg;fin ~ ~fiia. "E z~ ~'• 1€ sea ~;t ~a"e „s~a~..,. ~~3~€ g~ TaysE ai ~i _~ ra~ agg" ai :~ i : sitri 1= ~s~ ~i~=Ks ~~e .~ig 'e "~ a ~~ 3i ~ Es ra !¢~-x ado ~_~- = z; _ a= d"~i ~s i*ed ~g"if gar - ~: r ~~~~ ! d~ e~ i ~~ ";pc si e~~~ ieas~i 3 5" ij~i ~ _s x ~ 5Y 'i~ ~- aijg ~t~y~~@ y's '~ i z- ~ s. ~~° ;= ~- ~~~ c ii iy~e st =fs~ ~- }xy- rgs ~~w}' $ ~d. ai ~- _"sas~ -° 3 :i'3isr~ i ii 3 ~ ~ t~~ d. a s aa-i yy_ -<BDS :SFi f 5~? :~~ =<° :i dsl~~i €s~ <af~ e~~basa +I ~I € - ~ ~I I MI yl ~ ~ ~I I~I~_ j 33 Q;G aG x ^` a 8 eFg~ r~~ „- ~. ^xg =" t~c~ a;s £~ ~~~t _~" eR a_gs 3°~ i 4^ ~"i a"ac i~j B3g~ ^r' ~i ~Yg~ waC ~~ :=~ 3~ i ~. e 3i~ a--~ x g1 R_ 3S~ ~? S ~~~ ;. s I ~ ~ ~ I~ It ~ ~~ ~ !~_"zf' ~ r~,€ ,:~:s€~; as ~- vji ~g~~ g; E~g g s~~ i~ ~g#~s_g gBi ~ ~S~ ; f ~ ~ ;i ~~7 of ;~ ~ggttg R 6~ ~i~ii R4~ ~C ~R~~C car ~g~res~: ~_ ~ ` ~ I^ n s o'R g ~ Z~~~i gg ~i $xF~ s ~~~g - RR ~ 3- ' R ;cc~" ~~a~E" ' F r~3E ~~ g ; ~ ~gS ~ YS R 4€~EI'c xt~5 ~g xg R S~q a R ~s^Rr --.-_~ g 3~ ~ o ;i~$i s~ icats ~ ~ q s ;,~: ig s ~s~ ~^ :f ff_g do [ ~C~ ' ~' ~ ~F~~ ~'~ ~ - $ Q R xxa iF i^ ~~ `~g~ ?~_~ ~R - a ~~'~ ~~9;t ig~f e ~~ r~~ 3d-= lgg~t 3 ~~ec si ~~gt [~E~e ~ Et: c~sr as ~ ggc'g g~}~ c! ~ n 3SE~, i~3 i~ i i ~ +~k~ _ sig ~ 356~S gg- ,~~~ ~ E f es~~4 ~Q.3 a d ~e'a -~ a~~ g}~j : = Q ~~~~g :~:~n~~ ~~ ~gc ;° Si is"4i si £ ~~q~ ~'~~ - S R 3S~a R i ^g =i~ G ; s<~y g~i ~7 ~ ~ fl~~E _i -a~~ ~ ; EF#- C[~ G_ ~ 3i3~4L ~e4 ~~~ .~ ~ gQ~L I ~ 3~'= a g33? S3a3g ~~" Cxv~F A~~9 ~$-js aa a c :~g ~ ~iC ~=~~t t ~^ F_= ¢RC t^~'tSd xgg RPg ~y. ~~~~g i$s spy ~$. seg aR3 sj?~A ~• c~ ~~f ~~pc£~ ~~~ ~a 491 ~T ~~ ~~~ ~ri ~-- s~S ~~5~ ~~~ ~Ss ~~~ =gp~~ i~j r@=~~ L3 it3~ s:~ asg ~R ssa 1,~9ssa" e~~ ~ I ! r sass F s s eg£i$3 -sue a ~ m~ I xl:-- $~~ i&$Egg ~~a s" ~ ; ~ 3ai8 a i saa s~!g~a as"? ~ ? ~~~~ 3 ~ x~a _~s`s` ~ ~' :~ a ~ s s. `a• ~ ~~as ~~ oee sa~5'' ~'~ .s I° ~ 3 ~'°~. ~° -=~i sgiEsa ~__ '~ I I I I as z E g~;ai s ;rt=• a; } s a a a 's - ..ae;9~ `a . ~~ ~~ z e s p ; sat= $ g!aa ass.g3} Y ~~`-'s - -s -s e s e. - Y ids€€ ~~ agr= ~_~s;ia s`~~ 3E s s .. s xes~~ ~s r - .~ ~ ^~ ~ ( ~ _I _I ^) ~ y €a Fs r g=+~• r e~~s ao s ~ ~~!>i ~$s, a~~r s sa8 ~ x is # _ rra ,iaa r~_>;s 'ar `E a •si = lr~~ €a ~ ~ i~5i ;r;~ ssias s ~• t; ~r !" a~a ;~ !~:"~ ~~ ~ r !s ~i: ~:~sa $ 3~ s~ ;~ .~ a-~~ }: f ! ~~' = a~ a = -i ~~ s ! i 3~-}} ~~ -s a ~~i -~ -a~ ~ gg ~ a= ~~ss ~ s _" t e3 3s!~ !s t~~~_ E~ ~s ~ #!eii a~ ~ ~is~i ~ :a ~ it ~; t s = ! a~~ r! r~~ rs ~ r~~s ~! ~!rs~ ~!F• = 9 ~s~~~ ~t3s A~_!~~ Wd~ ~~~ ~: ~ias <8 ~~~3s :i~ d~ a a ~, ~I ~I ~I ~~I ~I~ "I ~ ~I x""es "E" =~: ~E g:3~3 a~f =~e ^'~ i"E3" Fss =~~ fFx n~g~ ~~5 :s }_ dE g"s~_ sE~ ~E. ~~ 'x~iFE :E= is" :~ J".`~ ~ gYE ,s c;=_~ ~~~ hex i°- x~~s c~; s~~ E" ~; ~3x~ ~Fi ;3 s E "asi ;~ ~Q ~~~~ ~a~ ~~ cs ':ecc F3' st 5 C I I ~ I I V s; EE$ ; ~~ :~= ~~ ~£~ ~~ ~~ ~Fa ._ - o $~ Fr• : ~i :~ a Sq t ;f. 3s ~$ .R ~~ F F Cx ~a x ¢ lY 6! ~ 'e "S ' ? a c~ :~ ~` ~s ~x z a E 33 r ~R i I I I_ = I~~ ~ ~~ I~ Ir i ~~ axe ~x~~ - sa ; a~ ~~ r ~a "; ;` = ~~; "" -'» ;'~'~ ~aF~ a ~~ E i~ ~° ~f F~3~~,e ~ s"_~ des ~~ ~R°-~~ •S s' s- 5~~ a '- x c~ .R "E~ ~ F'x ~ ~~' ~~ RREE s i ~» E g S. s- ~s f ^'~ c'E sFE ., a s a c F x ~~: k 39 ;3 8 I~~~ cE 4 s~R a j~l. ~! E £e s^ - = s x =~ s d"~ a :!~ Fs S =e» ~ E P~ »p P Ea ~' i~ jR ~R~ ~ ~ RskE~ 7 d x ~~ ~~3~ S C s; SEE o ° ~ r =EEp~ p R ~E3 ~~ ~~SR .s aa"t c R c Yxt.$ x~ ~a~ I€R ~:ii ti A. ~y u a s: r< ;a ss °S ~~C ~~ F~; ~S8 g.X yS ~QL~ .a x~3 i ~~~ ~~ I ~.~~ i'3 ~ 18~g I I ~Sa ~~ $~'; fr~° `5~ "$xa ~~_ s; y~; s~ s:u ssB el 5,5: 9 ~~~! J~ i45i P3 .8..1 Ya ~~~E s~ ~,~3 e ~~ =ii a~ 3a~~ ~F ~~ ~_~~ €; ~~ rl ATE ~ :^i ~ =sr g ~~ €~" ^~~ $ 1yi _ `YDj t 22 i ~r~ ~ ~~s ~d ,s ~ g.s s=_"e d _~ ~ ; ~~~~ ~-~~ ~: _~ i a~ r+s [t ~5~~ ~x :~F:s p: , _ ~° r ~I jl s ^I ~ 9 i ~ ° d a L C s . ~.. I~ ~3 ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~; ~~ i- ~ ~ ~ =d~ " .~ d~ ~~ e ~V~ L w ~~ ~~ gYC 3h~ sE ~3, ~a~ 9~ ~ ze ~~# i~~ ~d ~x8 ~#z b8 s ~ , ;sn i~ !~~ !s~ Std ~i~yd; ~~. ~~~ F~d~ ~s~ d~~~'s ~I ~I ~I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 l0: oirr L,,.:r~.il aad City Mz-~;cr FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Engineering Aide ..s DR °.-°. ~^ 1CLaL^-d ..n H;e nn.th JUBJL01: unieriny i.iie itiiiewotiGn r -.., .. ..-. side of 19th Street, east of Raagna Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 - APN 202-171-31, 32, 35 RECONNFJDIITION: Ordering the Mnexation of DR 88-19, located on the north side of 19th Street, east of Raagna Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached is the Consent and Waiver signed Dy the developer for the subject project. This fora enables the City to annex property to existing awintena~e districts where all the property owners have granted ~n.t. rna<anr rn curh an annexation without condactina a oublic hearing or posting. TA1s annexation procedure is perNtted by the Streets and Highways Code. Also Included is the Certificate of Suffici?ncy executed by the City Engineer and the resolution to be adopted by the Council to finalize the annexation. Rasp f liy subwtitted, /~ ~ ~ RHM:JM:sd Attachment AnnxCOnsnt (ENG) CONSENT MID WIYEN TD NNE1U1T70R FQi DR HR-/9 WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CULAMON611, CALIFORNIA, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to tM terms W the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the "Act'), being Divi sl on 15. Part 2 - - - - ~;y;w.w• wue Yi the xace eT Cal lTarnl a, SplC1a1 mat ntenance~ di~strlct known and designated as Landscape Mat ntenance District No. 3 ,Street Lighting Maintenance Oistrtct No. and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referrt~ as the •Natntenance District'); and, WHEREAS, the provisions of Articie II of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the legislative body to order the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District; and, WHEREAS, the legislative boay may, pursuant to said provisions of the Act, order tM annexation of territory to the Maintenance D1strltt without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report' as would MMnrise be required by the provisions of tM Act 1f alt of the amen of property witMn the territory proposed to be annexed have given written consent to the proposed annexation; and, WHEREAS, the undersigned, tM owner's of all property within tM terrlta'y proposed to be annexed to tM Maintenanu District, uknowladge that pursuant to tM provisions M the Act, tM undersigned would ba entitled to notice and hearing and the preparation of an Engineer's 'Report' pertaining to the annexation of the property owned by the undersigned to CM Maintenance District. The undersigned, horever, acknowledge tMt they are swan of the proposed annexation to tM Maintenanu District of tM property owned by tM ..w Aww., wwwA ~wA r., uw w..u V~.,M ."MIA ,I,w IMA•M~~MA n,wY „IY I„V~ ,I, ..~-~.-. •..--, ..-..- ~.~ uA ell ..•.._ ..... _.. _..- _.._-. _. . .. _.. .._._ __ notice and hearing or tM filing of an Engineer's 'Report' pertaining to tM annexation of the undersigMds' property to tM MalMenanee District. NOW, THEREFORE, it is Mreby deciarad by tM undersigned property owners as follows: SECTION 1. TAat tM above recitals era all true and correct. SECTtdI 2. That LiM undersigned, constltutinq tM owners of tM property described in Exhibit •A• aLLacMd hereto and incorporated herein by this rMarena and further constltuting all of !M property ritNln tM territory proposed to M annexed to tM Malntanana ^!strlet, hereby conseriL to the proposed anmxatlon of said property to the Malntenanu District rlthout notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report' pertaining to such annexation. DATED: 1, - 7.7-R9' ~~~~~ o / ~ ~~ '; ~, %-r-tie ~- ~~° _~. I oJ- ~';. CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF CONSENT AMD YAIrER TO ANNEXATION f0A 9 STREET LI6NIIM6 11111MTEMAIN:E DISTRICT M~~ ..sn sT.~eT Li°-'!rSw!s Ma+e+r~uwc nveTerrr x~- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611 RUSSELL H. NAOUIRE, the undersigned, hereby certifies as follows: That Ian the duly appointed CITY ENGINEER of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA. That on the yen day of .tanuac ~, 1990, I reviewed a Consent and Nalver to MnexatTon pertain ng-f~he amiexaLlon of certain property to the Maintenance District, a copy of which 1s on f11e in the Office of the C1b Clerk. That I caused said Consent and Nairer to Annexation to be exanlned and aN exanlnation revealed tMt said Consent and Nalver to Mnexattan has been signed by the owners of all of the Droperty within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District. That said Consent and Natwr to Mnexatton naets Lba requirawents of Section 22608.1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the Stale of California. EXECUTED this 9~.h day of January 199n, ~o~Cucanonga, California. CITY DF IFORNIA ~n3 ?iF ~~; ' RESOLUTION N0. ~-O,r,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE r,ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF resratw rcootrnar m LAND$GVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIBHTIN6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 88-19 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga. California, has previously forced a special Mwintenance district pursuant to the tern of the "Landscaping and LTghttng Act of 1912', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special saintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lt9htlnS }La,t~nz Di~tr!ct Nc. '_ ,he:a~f•~.. r'c..s3 tc a~ t.` °~1- F I.LellarM1e District"1; and- NHEHEAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NNEREAS, at this tine the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refererrced to the Maintenance District; aM NNEREAS, al) of the orners of property within the tercitory proposed tc be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notta and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Reeort'. NOiI, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGII HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLL0115: SECTION is That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown to Exhlblt •A' and the cork prograe areas as described in Exhlblt "B' attached heroto to the Maintenance District. SECTIgI 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, includlny'iTieT-of all assess~aents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 1 ~ I '~i. ~xwar •~• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGN'flNp MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 s/TE J ~ ~~ `~~ ,...a ~ _ _ yk I o S rr~V mrc x•..» ~ r •nn w•r ro ~ ~~ ...e .. p~~ A~.' n 5 .« ~ ~ e yy ^ Mi•.. 1 ~~ ~I ~ ®~ .Yy ~ .. ~'~a ..ta. ~~, ~• .___.__ ~i~~- __ ~i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDNIO ~ STATE OR CALIRORNIA ~~'~-' ENxtetT •e• PROJECT NNE: DR 88-19 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 6.04 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 12.08 units APN 202-i71-31. 32. 35 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Laeips to be Annexed District qo. 50W~--9500L~'6,'OOdTI;W~2T,30D" 1 --- --- --- --- --- 6 --- --- --_ --- -__ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. Street Nave 3 --- JM: 2/7/90 `, i:' `,~4, Turf Ground Corer Trees Sq. ft• Sq. ft. Ea. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager rKUm: eY: SUBJECT: ausscii n. naguire, ~i Ly engrneer Millie Valbuena, Engineering Technician Approval Ieprovenent Agreement, Improvement Security for 13181 w ran nia c~wa! eulr(tteA br James Banks. Jr. RECOAEIbATIOM It is recoweended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,iect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACK6ROUMD 13181 Victoria Street, is a single fn11y residence located on the south side of Yictoria Street, between Etiwanda and East Avenues. The Developer, James Banks, Jr., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts. Time Certificate of Deposit Faithful Performance: f10,020.00 Labor and Material: f 5,010.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. ResD~ y submitted, /~~~~ R W:ri Attachments :; RESOLUTIDN No. ~p- p~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIfORMIA, APFROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 13141 VICTORIA STREET YHEREAS, the the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga, California, has for its consideration an Iproveaent AgreeaKnt executed on February 7, 1990, by Janes banks, Jr, as Developer, for Lhe iprovea~ent of public rlgt-of-way adJacent to the real orooert_v soeciftcally described Therein, and generally located at 13181 Victoria Street; and NHEREAS, the installation of such iproveawlnts, described 1n satd In~proverent Agree~ent and subJect to the terax thereof, is to be done in conJunction with the developax!nt of said real property; and NHEREAS, said Iprovement Agreeaw:nt is secured and accopanied by good and sufficient Iprovaaent Security, rhich is identified in said [proveiaent AgreeaM•nt. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY CWNCIL OF 711E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Iproveaknt A9reeaknt and said Iprovenent SecurlLV be and the saax: are hereby approved and the Mayor is heroby authorized to sign said [provenent A9reewent on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucaaxmga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~,.; i o8 S.° :4,... f O~ e= x V Yrr O ~. V ~. ~~ ~. CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Nillie valbuena, Engineering Technician buaJECT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreement, improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract 13886 and Parcel MoD 11394, located at the northwest corner of Bsse Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by The Barnaakian Company RECOMMENDATI011 It is recoxnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13886 and Parcel Msp 11394, accepting the subiect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. i and 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said maps to record. ANALYSIS/BACKORWND T~x• line(, anA parrvl Nan 1139x: located at the northresL COYIIlr of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, 1n the Camamnity Service District of the Etlwanda Specific Plan, were both approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 1988, far the division of 5.81 acres into 46 condominl~ units and 4.37 acres into 2 parcels respectively. The Developer, The Bartaakian Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the oft-site improvements in the foliawing amounts: Base Line/Etiwanda Improvements Privste Street Faithful Perforwmnce Bond: 5485,000.00 560,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5242,500.00 530,000.00 Monumentatfon: 5 5,100.00 F ~:. ,~•r ~, tea, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13886 8 PARCEL MAP 11394 FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the Ctty Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater District. C.C. 8 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Mnexatton form signed by the Developer is on ftle in Lhe City Clerk's office. Respectf SnDmt~~ed, ~s~ rte' _-._~~ Attachments RESOLDTION No. 90 - ~ 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA_NDN611,_ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND~PARCEL MAP No.11394~ NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13886, consisting of 46 condominium units and Tentative Parcel Map Ib. 1i394, consfstin9 of 2 parcels, submitted by The 8aramxtan ceagagy, auudivider, ioaated at LFF ,^"t`.r.= corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, have been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Maps of satd Trut 13886 and Parcel MaD 11394 said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and wfficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Maps offering for dedication for street and higMay purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said tmproveamnt Agreement De and the same 1s approved and the 14Ryor is authorized to execute same on behalf of sold City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; ana 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subiect to approval as to forty anQ content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. G 1 k, ' ~ V {-~ N' r~~,: RESOLUTION NO. ~~-D~F(P A RESOLUTIDN ff THE CITY CDUMCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFDRNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF rcararu TiRRiTnRY TD STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL MAP 11394 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously iolwed a special ^aintena~rce district pursuant to ~_ •_. __ - t,`,a '^d~:r•-^ .~_ ~~,.~.~"".. e..t ..f lo7E• g"{..n ni"Iclnn 15. U c uci ~a of "L. ~.. " ~. . a..... a Part 2 of the Streets and Highwstys Code of the State Hof California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lightingg Naintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of CMpter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of Lhe owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed w1Lh the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hesring or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFDRE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF INL Cll( OF xAN1:MU w6ANUlaiA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOMS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in ExMb1t "A" and the work Drograa areas as described Tn Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including~ie Tery~of ail assessalents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. X13 ~. ~. EX-MlIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTNJG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 IW LOT 1 '~ Z W PRIVATE OPIVE_ ~~ f^'__~\I ~ Q LOT 2 ~-- PpIVATE DRIVE 7pAC O. 1388E m I- O r J M O PARCEI 1 I = PApCEL MAP 1130• ~ 3 _ f W 1 BASE LINE ROAD CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO n ~ STATE OF CA~Ii+ORNIA ~PM /13914 ~/388b Exxten •e• PROJECT NAM£: TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL IMP 11394 ND. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: TR 13886 46 dlu NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 23 units PN 11394: pcl 1: 3.56 ac .., _- S.. pcl 3: .59 S.3T acres 18.14 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No, of Laa~pps to be Mnexed District No. 58IAT~9500L I6';DW2~C,lARf273DU 1 -° 7 --- --- -'- 3 6 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D(STR[CT Dlstrict No. Street Nase Turf Ground Cover Trees Sq• ft• Sq. ft. Ea. JAA:2/7/90 ~~~ -T:... rtl~ti' L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: CTty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT' ~^^~^°•1 ^s uti., •~.-,...a.,,en• asesaunf Tr~rnva~ant CorUri tv and yam. ..... .. r, _^r. _._,.._ Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance 6l strict No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 12058, located south of 9th Street between Lion Street and Heilman Avenue, submitted by Rancho Business Partners RECOMNENDATiON It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 12058, accepting the subJect agreement and security, ordering the annexation Lo Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorfztng Lhe Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said wp to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 12058, located south of 9th Street between LTOn Street and Hellman Avenue in the General Industrial District (subarea 2), was aDDroved by the Planning Commission on June 13, 1989 for the division of 3.79 acres into S parcels. The Developer, Rancho Business Partners, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;67,010.00 Labor and Material Bond: ;33,505.00 Monumentation: ; 2,550.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Mater District. C.C. 6 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Resp tf ~ubmltted, Attachments RESOLUTION N0. 9O • Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 12058, (TENTATIVE PARCEL IMP N0. 120581, INPROVEMEN7 AGREEMENT, /NY IMF RY~ClILXI .KbUn„1 NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 12058, submitted by Rancho Business Partners, and consisting of 3 parcels, located south of 9th Street bebreen Lion Street and Heilman Avenue, was approved by the Planning Cosssisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 13, 1990; and NHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 12058 is the final map of the division of land approved as shorn on said Tentative Parcel Map;and NHEREAS, ali of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City bare nox Dxn met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Rancho Business Partners as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Lhat said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized Lo sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 12058 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer 1s authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ,: I l :' _~i..; ~> RESOLUTION N0. 9Q ' © `.J~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE><ATION OF CERTAIN TiRRiTnRY Tn IaNQtr!!Dr Ya iw>T4"ur[ n,CTR1rT un ? awn STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL IMP 12058 NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously forced a spr_'!al maintenance district pursuant "a the tenas of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Hlghwgys Lode of the State of California, said special aaintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street L1^h«r^ !~infonenta gictrirf, No. 1 and Street Lightln9 ~.. _. . Maintenance District No. 6 hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance Dl strict"); and NHEREAS, the Provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintanance District; and NNEREAS, at this tine the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhlblt "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proDOSed annexation without notice and hearing or tiling of an Engineer's "Report'. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the aWVe recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative 6oQy hereby orders the annexation of the proper y~T-as shown in Exhlblt "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Naintenance District. SECTION 3: Thal alt future proceedings of the Maintenance District, lncludln -Eli-e levy of all assessments, shall be applleable to the Lerritory annexed hereunder. ~, II V ~., a ~: ..,ten:::~ . EXfIlIT •A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTMG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 9 AND 6 (ty.r, n~ Unj I I ~ ~ _ .. _.. i I C „u;; j ~{ I ~ i I U ', rrAnx• 1 P ~ Nn. w'/ I I I. RYLeI / , i' ~ `Xcr:it'i~T rwi i + '~ li~_ (, ~+ _ ~/ ~. ; /~.a~b../) ,_.. sae Vfu-.,,/.. ~ I Pa e/ E ~ l -Mrcrl '~ I r~ I rr,~w / iuk..wl 1 i~ ~~w~lal5l rz...: ~.re..l .. -h / , ~ I. ` ~ q rr. 5-~_~a ~I sr / _ ~- ~ ~ !w wra) ~'h:! / ~ .... r. i „_.,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COWiTY Of SAN BERNARDMIO ~M l2l15~ Q ~+ STATE OF CALIRORNIA E101IBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: TRACT 12058 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 3.79 acres ND. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 7.58 units ': - N.~. .. 2: 1.54 3: 1.29 3: /9' acres STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTRICT No. of Lasps t0 be Mnexed District No. 5BWC95DOL-ZG,"WD~~7.50II 1 --- --- --- --- --- 5 --- --- -__ --_ --- LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Nape Sq• ft. Sq. ft. Ea. 3 He11Ban Avenue --- --- 7 Lion Street --- --- 8 JM:2-7-90 I~~ r.. <ac'r. CPl'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: City Council and Cfty Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, C1fy Engineer BY: Steve M. aiiiiiand, rublic works inspecio SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12611-1 thru -4, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes RECO~EINiATIDN It 1s recowmended that the CTfy Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subiect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12671-1 thru -4 were approved by the City Council on August 20, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful PlrfOrmanCe Bona: i1,Ua{,000 Labor and Material Bond: f 517,000 The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 6 month extension on said taQrovement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Rasp 11 pbmitted, Attachments ,.. `ib.: ,,. >~:' Lewis Homes Management Corp. 156 NoM Mououiu Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Up1xuQ Cati(oroia 91785 7141985-0971 FAX: 71d/981.9799 December 27, 1989 _ ty _ _-_ _ ____aya EngineeringyDivisionV Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Steve Gilliland Re: Improvement Agreements -- Haven Avenue and Tract 12671 Gentlemen: Enclosed, in response to your letters dated December 7 and received December 20, are two $251.00 checks and executed Improvement Agreement Extension forms Por the above-referenced items. We have completed everything we can on Haven Avenue until SCE :'i~~.l;tr~. the pole relocation, at which time we can fill in the .ele ~ curb and finish the landscaping, so a six month ......1.: .~ a~tl.cia::L .`o~ i;a.an. A 671, since the Milliken Avenue median design was ,~ ~ .y approved, allowing us to proceed with working o~. ~. rrich have not yet been submitted for plan check), pe< ~•~, year should be allowed as we don't know how fast the pla :ek will go -- the landscaping itself should only take a cool months once the plans are approved. 'a l' sat 9a9-66ea if any discussion or additional information sded. Cordially, LEWIS CH~O I,MEF~/S.~~ryM~1AN~AGEME-NT CORP. Don M. Thompson Project Manager DMT:ad Enclosures /~ RESOLUTION N0. 9~ - O59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT rvTcuy lny AN11 IiiPoOYc{sur $C~nRrTY FOR TRACT 12671-1 TNRU -4 i1NEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has Por iLs consideration an improvement Agreement Extension - .atcd :; - :;~ 7 1».., b; La:,is HoxmS a5 daY810per, .°or the improvement of~public right~of-wary aglacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Or1ve; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement a~ subJect to Lhe tenas thereof, is to be done to conjunction with the development oP said Tract 12611-1 thru -4; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified to said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the C1LY of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same an hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, end the City Clerk to attest thereto. la3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT rn.~. .~ u1J , i0: City Council and City Manager i FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Puolic Nor%s Inspect.. SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for -,Tract 13697, located on southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Carrara Street, submitted by Daly Hones RECONEiMTIOY It is recaswended that the Ctty Councii adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agresent a%tension and securlllr and authortxing the Mayor and City Cierk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public lmproveaents for Tract 13697 were approved by the City CouMii on June 2, 1988, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: :679,000 Labor and Material Bond: =339,500 The developer, Daly Homes, is requesting approval of a 6 month a%tension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Res P ly bm/tted, .r-~ R Attachments ~% . r. ~~ ~- , ~ ~~~ ~~, ~. ~ De cemher 7n. 14n9 ~~'i}9~., .. ~ ~ _~ ~L_~'.. ~ :. G~ City of Rancho Cucamonga P ilhtir Wnrks De oa rtment P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Atte ntlon: Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Re: Tzact 13697 - Improvement Agzee me nt Exte nslon Dear Mz. Gilliland: I am in ze ce ipt of your lettez dated Decembez 7, 1989. I would like to extend the agzeement time limitation and have enclosed a check in the amount of 5251.00. The improvements in question have not been completed due to pending unresolved issues awaiting response and dlzectlon Ezom the Clty concerning the wall along Haven Avenue and the vault along the equestzlan trails. We zequest an extension of six months allowing time for the establishment peziod, waiting peziod and City Counsel acceptance zequized by the City as part of the pzocess of releasing these impzovements. If you have any questions, please feel fzee to ca il. Sincerely, DALY HOM OF CALIFORNIA, INC. m nes 1 vresident of Construction T,1/tm enclosuzes IaS RESOLUTION N0. ~-~ (Q O A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13697 ~.. ~~ z; L }k~sa* NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cu:amonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreexnt Extension executed on February 7, 1990, by Daly Haves as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-walr adiacent to the real Droperty specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Carrara Street; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, is to be lore in coniunctlon with the development of said Tract 13697; and NHEREAS, said Improvmaent Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified 1n said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancha Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approval and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension On behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamongs, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAT'c: February 7, 1990 To: City Council aM City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pub11c Norks InsDecto~ SUBJECT: Approval of IaQroveaxMt Agreeoent Extension for Tract 13715, located on the northeast corner of Jennet Street and Exeter Court, suMaltted by Mal ton Construction Coapagy RECOMMEMDIITION It is recomended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,{ect agreewent extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agree~ent. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND lnprovement Agreement and [aprorment Security to guarantee the construction of the public iaprovments for Tract 13715 were approved by the C1ty Council on June 2, 1988, 1n the fallowing mounts. Faithful Perforwance Bond: (44,000 and ;19,000 Labor and Nateriai Bond: ;22.000 and ; 9,500 The developer, Mal ton Construction Capany, is requesting approval of a 6 month extension on said improvement agrement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension arc available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp fitted, Attachments d ~. ?s. *h•~y/alton Associated xo~i«w!burn~hlery i Oamornueoxns i yenam,wrcomu9n!o i le~sl9a3eeoe January 5, 1990 Honte Preacher, publ lc Works Engineer JAPE -~ ~99Q City of Rancho Cugamonga Community Development Department ~~~' °' "^NCHO CUCAiyDN~ Engineering Division ENCINFERINC DIyISION P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: ~piration of Improvement Agreement for Tract 13715 Dear Mr. Preacher: on December 20, 1989 we recieved notice that the improvement agreement for the above tra:-t had expired. :ae rnspnctfully request a six month extension o! this improvement agreement for tract 13715. BnClwed is the required form requesting the extension and our check in the amount of 5251.00 for the Lees. The following work is still required prior to coapletion of all the work covered in the improvement agraament: 1. Hand rake horse trails. 2. Complete horse trail fencing. posts are in but some are Hissing pvc rails. 3. Final course of paving required on streets. Work in tract 13715 ie tied into the cork on tract 10349 and sill be completed together with that tract. Tract 13715 includes 6 homes of ahich one is completed, and occupied, and the other 3 nearing completion. Should additional information be required please lot se knr_~. Sincerely, THE wAlltdt CO!@ANY Cha~~ erhed~ Executive vice president cc: NSlliam Rsymond Clyde Anderson RESOLUTION N0. q~` Q (~ ' :. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOi16A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROYFAENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AI® IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13715 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an hproveNent AgreeaKnt Exknslon execukd on February 7, 1990, by Melton Construction Company as developer, for the imProvealent of Dublic right-of-way ad,~acent k the real property specifically described therein, and general Ty lOCased on tha rortheasL corner of Jennet Street and Exekr Court; and NHEREAS, the installation of such ta>provements, described in said IeArovement Agreement and sub,~ect to the krmS thereof, is to be done 1n can unction with the development of said Tract 13715; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Exknsion is secured a~ accompanied by good and wffteient Improvement Security, which is identified in said improvealent Agreement Exknslon. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ciq of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improveaent Agreement Exknston and said Improvement Security be and the salve are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk k atkst therck. ~~~ ?Py... "V.~Yi.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOftT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer ~~> BY: Steve M. 611111and, Public Norks Insoecie~74CC a ~~_ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 86-27, located at 9133 Center Street, submitted by California Finished Metals RECONEIOJITIOM It is rei.awmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizfng the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement ar.C Improvement Security to guarantee the construction o° the public improvements for OR B6-17 rare approved by the Ctty Council on December 22, 1488, Tn the following amounts. Faishful Performance Bond: 558.000 labor and Material Bond: 529,000 The developer, California Finished Metals, is reQuesting approval of a 3 month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. ResDec 1Lted, 'RNM:56. Attachments /3 0 MVB~ '"Mountain View Builders Inc. 2679 S. Waterman Avenue, Suite "D" San Bernardino. U oa4en ~+!e~ «±_- ;_,,, _ w ;;V JANAURY 15, 1990 CITY OF RANCkp COCAKN('.A Post Office Rox 807 9320-C Ease Line Street Rancho Cucarrnga, California 91729 Telephone tharher: 714-989-18b2 R~~E~VED c:~r ~ ~99Q OF P.~ fA'~MFEA~ d1V~h PRJ,7F7Cf NUPSER: OR 86-27 P[mJflc,T NAME: California Finished Metals REFERENCE: fScteneion xequeat for the off-site imp¢ovmmrte ATI'FM'ICN: Mr. Steve Gilliland Gear Mr. Gillila:d: ro yci v icpiuc un a~ao~i,nr r~iuxyr ~uuuay vim, iiiv, i wa iiia,y yw ii:in letter in refarelxe to an extension rs~quest regarding our ta:d for the offsite inpravemants, for an additiun=1 three (3) months from this date. We have crnpleted moat of the on-site construction, and we have crnpleted the ofF-site undergraad slang Seventh Street a:d the :a:dertgrxid for the strew[ light on Center Street. I4a ere waiting for Southern California glison hook-~, also ve need this extension for the north perking lot drain to care to Center Street. we hope this eorteneion rill ba approved and tae will have a~tpletion three (31 soothe. Thank you again. Ye^j t , Richard AIN V1E51 EUILpEiSr INC. RA: ca CC: MC. Les Harenovet Calltorni4 Fytfiahed Motels ~1' ~. ~ AMlrti[ -Mdn ere!er RESOLUTION N0. 90_ ~`Yd, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1gNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IIiROYEMENT AGREEMENT EI(TENSION AMD IlRNOYEMEMT SECURTri FdI DR 8fi.27 a„,` NHEREAS, the City Cau~il of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, California, has for Its consideration an Iagrovenest Agreeaent Extension executed on February 7, 1990, by CaliforMa Finished Metals as developer, for 'f 'wTiw '~'~t ••f M .~M M f!r eval a rtV t,R ,w`yrvC sa p . ,y, -.. =.~ aw....._ !'4p1. specifically described therein, and generally located at 9153 Center street'; and MHEREAS, the installation of such iMproveaents, described in said Isgroveeent Agreeoent and subiect to the tern thereof, is to be done 1n confunction with the developMeent of said OR 86-27; and NHEREAS, said Isproverent Agrensent Extension is secured and accaiyanied by good and sufflNent Iraproverent Security, which is identified in said Iaproveaknt Agreexxnt Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the Ci;y Counetl of the C11y of Rancho Cucuonge, California hereby resolves, that said Iaprovaaent Agreeaw!nt Extension and said Iaproveaknt Security be and the sane are hereby approved aiM the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said lsproveaxnt AgreeMetit Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucaraonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 13a- CTPY OF RANCHO CUCAAtONGA STAFF ftEPOftT ~.+F_ F.A.,lgrw 7. 1090 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Nagutre, City En9lneer 6Yi Stsve M. Gilliland, Public Norks InsPecton-~~ SUBJECT: IipP~uvaelliieoti, I~ ated non Aeasr t~oft Havenn Avenue beHtween Church Street and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes pECONEIDATION It is reco~aended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sold agreement. AHIILYSISlBACKGROUND Improvement Agreement atld Iprovement Security to guarantee the construction Strteet ndlgasemLine~Roed were approved by thefCltyeCouncil~oneDecelabern~l7h Faithful Performance Bond: 5144,500 Labor and Material Bond: S 72,250 The developer, Lewis Homes, 1s requesting approval of a 6 month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Iaprovement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. Res submitted, /f R . Attachments it x,. Lewis Homes Management Corp. i 156 Naith ~ Avmm / P.O..Boa bA / Uplaed. Cdi[ami~ 91765 71~985-09'll FAX: 7149a1A799 December 27. 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Steve Gilliland Re: Zmpravemolt Agrmammlta - 8avm hvanw and Tract 12871 Gentleman: Enclosed, in respolw to your lsttars dated OsCAber 7 and received Oacambar 20, are tw0 5251.00 dlaeks and a>oecuted Impravemant Agwamant >Qxtalnion tarar for the above-referenced items. We have caspleted warything w can oa Sawn Avenue until SCE finiahaa the pole relocation, at whioh time ve can fill in the remaining curb a1W finish the lalMseaping, so a six month extension whculd hw nlffi ri wnt fnr Nwvwn. AS t0 Tract 12671, ainca the Mllllku' Ava~ma median design was just recently approved, allowing us to proceed with working drawings (which have not yet bean submitted for plan check), perhaps a year abould ba allowed as we don't know how fast the plan check will qo -- the landscaping itself should only take a couple months once the plans era approved. Call me at 9a9-6688 i! slry discussion ar additional informtion is needed. Cordially, LEwI3 LOll68 MANAGEMENT CORP. Dorla~- Prajamt Menagsr OMf:ad Encloauras 13~ RESOLUTION N0. 9O '~V+ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, APVROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IIPROYEIENT SECURITY FOR HAVEN AVENUE IMPROYEIENTS NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement regiment Extension executed on February 7, 1990, by Lewis Hanes as developer, for the improvement s ..,...,,. _... _~ .. .. __ _ _ ,~~ a speciiicallY described therein, and generally located on the east side of Harem Avenue between Church Street and aase Line Road; and NNEREAS, the Tnstaliation of such iyrovements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the tens thereof, is to be done in coniunctlon with the development of said Haven Avenue Improvements; and NFN:REAS, said Iaqrovement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Iagrovement Security, which 1s identified to safd Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and safd Improvement Security be and the sane are hereby approred a~ the MaYOr 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 13~ 4~y ~h~,: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager ~~~ FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 611111and, Public Morks Inspector~~._ $uR,1FCL• Release of Bonds and Notice of Cowpletion The repaired street taprovenents for Tract 9225 have been cocpleted in an acceptable canner, and it is recaaaknded that City Council accept said icprovecents, and authorize the City Engineer file a Notice of Coagletlon. The Faithful Perforcence Bond Ms Deen in effect during the one year autintenance period. Therefore, tt is also recoaaaended that the City Clerk be authorized to release the Faithful Perfonance Bond in the aanunt of (119,000. BACKOROUNO/ANALYSIS Tract 9225 - located on the rarthvest corner of Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue. DEVELOPER: Hill-Nilliacs Developcent 5500 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Anahel^ Hills, CA 92807 Release: Faithful Perforwance Bond (Street) 5119,000 Respect ) subcltted, i ~ / / ,. ~r ~- :dl Attachalent ~i__ t 3 i;' l~yr. RESOLUTION NO. 9Q- OHO 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYElENTS FOR TRACT 9225 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING !~ A NOTICE OF C,'2;'L~..~R' ~~ ^w w.~ MHEREAS, the construction of public imprevemertts far Trect 9225 have been coiapteted to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Copletton is reQuired to be filed, certifying the work cooptete. ROM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho CuCaNOnga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and f11e a Notice of Caepletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardiiro County. 13~ ,: :~ ~. ,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council anA r.~w Nananar ~ V ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 611111 and, Public Norks InsDecTOr'~e~`_ $iio.?'c~T• R9?9359 of Bonds and NOtira of f^nl ofinn RECONEImATION: The required street improvements for CUP 84-39 (DR 88-07) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recoeaended that C1ty Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to f11e a Notice of Completion and authorize the C1ty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the mount of 521,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS CUP 84-39 (DR 88-07) - located on the east side of Rochester Avenue between 4th Street and 6th Street. DEVELOPER: Sven Pools, inc. 9'13J Rocnester Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 521,000 RespeC s ltted, RHM:SMB:d'~W Attachment e. _~„ , RESIX.UTION No. 90 -b ~ a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDN611, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENlS FOR CUP 84-39 (DR 88-07) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NDTILE OF GOla'Lt~ltN rim InC iirnw MHEREAS, the construction of public ieproveaents for CUP 84-39 (DR 88-07) have been caigleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and MHEREAS, a Notice of Caiapletion is required to be filed, certifying the work co~aplete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaxionga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby acceppted and the City Englnter is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Cospletton with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~3`j .~.~ .;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT "''`' - DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: February 7, 1990 City Council and City Manager Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. 611111and, Pub11c Norks Inspettoi~ Release of Maintenance Bond ror Tract L2833 located on si¢ southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and South Victoria Nlndorws Loop RECOMIEIRIATIOM: It is reconsended thst the City Council authorize the C1ty Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year s>,lntenance perlad has coded and the street inprovenents reutn free iron defects in Materials and worksvtnship. DEVELOPER: Ntlitan Lyon Canpany 8540 Arohlbald Avenue, Suite 8 Rsncho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 7;64,936 Respectf ,y submttted,j IM• :, t, ~;" `h?a,.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ;;. ;g;~ :9» Date: February 7, 1990 To: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager By: Raren Mc6uire-Emery, I~ssociata Park Planner Subject: Acceptance oP the Vintage Park Project in the Victoria Planned Con:unity That the City Council accept the Vintage Pnrk Project improvements ae complete and authorize the Community Services Manager to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the release of the Paithiul Performance Bond in the amount of $56C, 000. B7ICRGRODND: The Vintage Perk Project, located at 11745 Victoria Park Lone in the Victoria Planned Community, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Community 8arvicas Department. it is therefore recommended that the City Council accept the project Prom the William Lyon Company as complete end direct the Community Services Department Menagar to file a Notice of Completion for the work. RME/kls '-1 I RESOLUTION NO. 90- ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tf[E CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THB PUELIC IxPROVExENT3 FOR THE VINTAGH PART( PROJECT AND ALITRORZEING TAE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE WHEREAS, the construction of public isprovemante for the Vintage Park Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the Manager of Community Services; and WHEREAS, n Notice oP Completion ie required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, bs it resolved, that the wozk is hereby accepted and the Nanagez of Community Services is authorised to sign and file a Notice o! Cospletion with the County Recorder of San Esrnardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ACCEPTED the 7th day of February 1990. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: Dennis L. Stout, xeyor ATTEST: Uebra Adams, city Clark '~~ ORDINANCE N0. 415 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT N0. 1 TO AN ExiSTTWG DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A HOTEL WITHIN THE FOOTBILL DESIGN AND COMMERCIAL CENTER A. Recitals. (i) rho ral if~r r;ia .e'1°_rnment rCde $~tti 0' $:P,GO, o~. 6ry., 8~.. provides, in pertinent part, as follows: A Development Agreement may be amended, or cancelled in whole or in part, by mutual consent of the parties to the agreement or their successors in interest. (ii} On January 2, 1988, the parties hereto entered into a Development Agreement concerning a commercial development, "Foothill Design and Commercial Center", (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement"). (iii) The original developer, BCE Development Inc., was succeeded by Reilly Commercial Corporation. (iv) The developer has transferred a portion of its interest, through sale of land known as Lots 9 and 10 of Parcel Map 10617, to Great Western Hotels Corporation, part of the real property of Agreement. !vl Great Western Hotels Corporation and Reilly Commercial Corporation have requested Amendment No. 1 to Development agreement no. ni-ul, as described in the title of the Ordinance. Hereinafter, in this Ordinance, the subject lunendment is referred to as the "request". (vi) On January 10, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cc nducted a fully noticed public hearing and recommended approval of this request. (vii) On January 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the request. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the recordation of this Ordinance have occurred. °. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: 1. This Council specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordfnance are true and correct. 2. Therefore, pursuant to Section 65868, et. seg., of the California Government Code, the City Council approves Amendment No. 1 of the Development Agreement 87-01 as attached hereto as1Exhibit "1". '~ 1 Ordinance No. 415 Page 2 3. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dai1,~Re_port, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rant ho Curamnnna, .~, /~ s~,. ~yw:.~ Ordinance No. 415 Page 3 EXHIBIT "1" RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WH.N KtWKUtU, K[IUnN Tu: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4 9320 Base Line Road P,ancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Debbie Adams AMENDMENT N0. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT B7-O1 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENT'iREO INTO ON JANUARY 2, 1988 ENTERED INTO BY AND BET.iE EN 8CE OEY ELOPNENi INC. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMON GA A. Amendment. 1. Section 3, Condition 3 of Development, is hereby amended to read as fell aws: 3. A Uniform Sign Program, excluding the hotel, Shall hF cnMilfeH nri nr fn iec„ennn nF building permits, and which is compatible with the architectural style and addresses the si gnage needs of the design, commercial and food park users. 2. Exhibit No. 2, Fermitted Uses, is hereby amended to add "Hotel" as a permitted use under the category "Business Related Services." 3. Section 3, Condition 7 of Development, is hereby amended to read as follows: 7. A uniform design of hardscape, such as pavement material, trash receptacles, benches, bicycle racks, etc., for the entire site, excluding the hotel, shall be submitted for City Planner revfew and approval. 4. Other than as specifically amended hereby, Lhe Agreement and each and every term and provision thereof, shall remain in full force and effect. (,~ -3- Il Ordinance No. 415 Page 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Amendment No. 1 to this Agreement as of the dates set forth below opposite the name of each such party. llil U~ RW1biiU wLiViiWtlr'. Dated: Dated: GREAT WESTERN HOT'cL5 CORPORATION Oy: Date; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ) SAN BE RNAROINO ) By: MAY R Rttest by: C TY CLERK Title: On before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared and proved to me on the basis of ,aLiaiu~t:,~~ :.. ..._,.__ !^ !~^ *tiP rwrcnn who executed this instrument as of GREAT WESTERN HOTELS CORPORAL IUn and acknowledged to me that suc o icer is authorized to execute on 6e half of such corporation. REILLY COMMERCIAL CORPORATION By: Date: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ) SAN BE RNARDINO ) Title: On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and or said County and State, personally appeared and proved to me an the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed this instrument as of REILLY COMMERCIAL CORPORATI and at now edged to me that suc o f cer is authorized to execute on behalf of such corporation. _ ~(-4- ~1~ ORDINANCE NO. 416 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'f HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 89-02, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE Py ennrur. rHAPTER 17.24. SECTIONS 17.24.010 THROUGH 17,24.090, 17.06.O10.C.1.g, AND 17.06.020.0.6; AME NOING SUBSECTIONS 17.06.O10.E.5, 17.08.040.8 AND C, 17.08.050. E.5, 17.18.020.D, 17.18,030. A, 17.18.030. C, 17.18.040. A. 1, 17.18.040. E.5,a, ANO 11.18.040. E.5, b: kND DELETING SUBSECTIONS 11,O6.Ol0.E.5.a THROUGH f, +; 18 040. A. 1.a rporniru AHn 17.18.p40.E.5.a.i THROUGH iv., REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF OJIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT, AND MAKING FINOI NGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A, Recitai s. (i) On December 13, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code and recommended to the City Council that this Council adopt the Development Code Amendment as set forth in this Ordinance. (ii) On January 17, 1990, the City Councit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Dover nment Code. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. THE CITY COON C[L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recftals, Part A, of the Ordfnance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and co ns ~idered in compliance With the California Environmental quality Act of 1470, and further, this Counr, it hereby Tssues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: (a) The proposed amendments Will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part lI. I~~ Ordinance No. 41fi Page 2 ~, _Y'~5.. (b) The proposed amendments will promote and further implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan 6y protecting the natural character of the foothills, by limiting the potential alteration of the natural landform, and by ensuring the safety, health and well-being of the community through restriction of development from areas with potentially unsafe envirdrr.:ental conditions including soil erosion, landslide, seismic, tl god, tire, po n utton, as Me11 as limited public service access. (c) The proposed amendments shall preserve the scenic character and minimize potential negative aesthetic impacts as a result of conventional grading in the northern areas of the City by revising the definition of hill^de fr,..,. 1^ ^Y _.^.t to a.^.clude land kith ,..,ata al s~^ = os a Y-'--nt ^_r Y." `. Y" greater. (d) The amendments encourage the protection of natural areas for ecological, education and other scientific purposes by restricting development from sensitive hillside areas and by encouraging a more sensitive trea Anent to the land in the northern City and sphere areas. (e) The amendments will preserve the foothills at grades 30 percent or greater as a natural resource and will promote open space land uses by restricting development from significant features of land such as rock outcroppings, ridgelines, sensitive wildlife ha Di tats, creekside or riparian woodlands, and view corridors. (fJ The amendments will avoid residential densities which exceed the capacity of the land and level of service that tan reasonably be supplied by limiting the intensity of development to hillside areas through eue uYV, ~w~rvu ~. . . tj..., .. ,.... .~ ~. (g) The a m e n d m e n t s will encourage innovative and sensitive development in the hillside areas through the provision of guidelines and standards which address site design, driveway and roadway design, architecture, walls and fences, landscaping, grading and drainage. (h) The amendments shall limit the potential negative impacts on adjacent developed and undeveloped properties as the result of additional requirements for hillside areas. (i) The proposed amendments wilt result in minimal impact to environmentally sensitive areas through the use of transfer of development credits to areas which are less sensitive. SEQ UJN 4: The foliorting subsections of ehe Oavelopment Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga are hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: I ~~ Ordinance No. 416 Page 3 a) 17.06.O10.E.5: 5. Gradi na Committee: The Grading Committee, comprising of representatives of each Division of the Community Development De par4ment will consider items such as, but not limited tn; cut and fill areas; drainage and flood control facilities; erosion control; retaining Malls; and the effect of proposed grading on adjacent properties. This Committee will determine if the Grading Pian meets City grading guidelines and policies. The decision of the Grading Committee will be forwarded to the City Planner or "r ianni ng Commission and wiii be based on t -°ia :. thin the City's Hillside Development Ordinance, Chapter 17,24. b) 17.08.040,0 and C, footnote R: A. Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Section 17.24.080.8. c} 11,08.040.8, adding footnote K and 17.08.040.C, adding footnote t which shall state the following: "[n hillside areas, heights shall be limited to 30 feet as specified in Section 17.24-070.0.1." d) 17,08.050. E.5 5. Tile ~ruJ e,.l ai lc ~i vci~yLot:.~. .':i tF.L .C^:'^71 l,e oe Hillside Residential, or is a hillside condition, defined as having slopes eight (8) percent or greater) and enviromnental studies have been conducted to determine land holding capacity and site development constraints, and the proposed density is no greater than tWO units per net buildable acre, e) 17.18.020,D D. A precise site development plan showing lot layouts, access, street design, building locations, bufldfng design, and grading, must be prepared in accordance with the residential review procedures contained in Chapters 17,06 and 17.08, in conjunction with any subdivision or development proposal in the Hillside Resideatial District. Aii such proposals must comply with the design guidelines and absolute policies in Chapters 17.08 and 17.24. ~~9 Y f' i~ Ordinance No. 416 Page 4 f) 17.18.030.A A. Minimum Parcel Size: No absolute minimum parcel widths and depths are required. Buildable area is considered to be a contiguous area of the lot which is less than thirty (30) Y`.____ -awu: di >:uyc w i. i.a mua uei.e nxiucu i.in uu yi, :iic envirorvnental studies and investigation as buildable and is subject to slope/w parity factor calculations contained in Section 17.24.080. g) i7.i8,OSU.c: Building height shall be consistent with the height provisions contained in Section 17.24.070.D.1. h) 17.18.040. A. 1: 1. Grading of any site shall conform to the following grading standards contained in Section 17.24.050. i) 17.16.040.E.5.a: a) Retaining walls shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the provisions contained in Sections 17.24.070.6, C, and G. j) 17.18.040.E.5.b: exposeu wai i> mw feu~cs ~ ay a.: ~'a;c c!:.'.'. h^ ^.^r o,re. than 5 feet in height, except gas necessary for acoustical purposes to satisfy Lhe intent of the noise ordinance. SECTION 5: Section 17.O6.OSO.E.5.a through f, 17.18.040. A.i.a through a and ~~$.040. F.5.a .i through iv of the Development Code is hereby deleted. SECTION 6: The Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amend- ending subsections 17.O6.Ol0.C.l.g, and 17.06.020.0.6, and Chapter 17.24, Sections 17.24.010 to 17.24.090 to read, in words and figures, as follows: a) 17.O6.Ol0.C.l.g (g) All projccts withi.^. a hillside area (foothills defined as having slopes eight (8) percent or greater) are subject to review per Sectian 17.24.020.8. a ' [~ fi Ordinance No. 416 Page 5 b) 17.06.020.0.6 Projects necessitating review as prescribed in Section 17.24.020.0. c) Hillside Development - Chapter 17.24, Sections 17.24.010 through 17.24.090. SECTION 7: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance he rendered or declared i nvalte by any rtndl CO U1'L action in a court oT' compei:eni jurl sdiciion, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION B: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dafl Re rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 'S' ~~., •,;e•., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAASONGA STAFF REPOBT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I February 7, 1990 City Council aRA city Mananar Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Barrye R. Hanson, Senior CTVit Engineer TD CONDITIDNAL DSE PERMiT 86-i2 ANU YARCLI. iiAP ii03v - RCJ ILRR rRJYLRIILJ - A request w ievviry a cvnm cwn yr apprvra~ requ r ng a ra fit signals be constructed prior to occupancy of any buildings for the developex!nt of a shopping center and related Parcel Map located at the northeast corner of Haver. Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1-77-421-36, 37 and 40 Staff recannends that the City Council sustain the Planning Commission's action by a denial of the appeal request. II. BACKGROUND: On January 10, 1990, the Planning Commission unanlnousty denied the applicant's request to nodify a condition of approval requiring the construction of traffic signals prior to occupancy of any buildings in the Tarn Center DroJect, including the Target store. On January 18, 1990, the applicant appealed the Caw•ission's decision to the Council. The applicant's appeal setter is attached, III. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting that the requirement to have all five traffic signal inproveaa•nts constructed prior to occupancy of aryy buildings be relaxed to allow opening of the Target store before the Foothill/Aspen Gain entrance) and Foothill/Spruce signals are operational. They are concerned that unforeseen construction delays could still naterlattze, causing the final signals 1n the lnstallatton sequence (progressing eastward Fran Foothill/Haven) to not be operational to time for the planned March opening of Target. The applicant contends that if the Target store does not open within its scheduling window, the opening x111 have to be delayed four (41 eronths. At the public hearing, the applicant indicated the opening date window could be hissed Dy as little as a day or two, but suggested that the condition be changed to require the Foothill/Spruce signal to be operational wfthln 2 weeks of the Target opening. They do not feel that traffic safety will be compromised during that period. cITY couNCa sTAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 2 The Planning Comaission disagreed, expressing concern that public safety would be compromised if the maior traffic generator in Phase I of Tam Center were to open with non-signalized entrances and exits on Foothill Boulevard. They also pointed out that the purpose behind requiring the Fxth!P ~c"re^_^ "+,~,~ w+" to nsvert total traffic away from Haven Avenue, thereby offsetting same of the increased traffic which the Target score will generate. The Ca~issioners felt that traffic safety was of greater concern to the City than lost sales tax revenues and suggested that Target might De flexible if the delay is only a day a two. The applicant has indicated that the reason that timing has reached such a critical stage is due to "complications in the permit process." There is an implication of responsibility on the Dart of the City, because the cooperative construction agreement between the City and Cal trans was not executed until December of 1989, thereby delaying the start of construction on Foothill Boulevard. It must be rated that it was the applicant who prepared the original cooperative agreement for the design phase which clearly states 7n the Recltais that construction would be subject to a separate agreement. This original cooperative agreement was signed by the City on ,lone 21, 1989, and was executed by Cal trans and returned by letter dated August 14, 1989, which reiterated the provisions of the original cooperative agreement that required an additional construction cooperative agreement. In responte to an inquiry made by Lhe applicant on October 31, 1989, the City Engineer reminded the applicant that 1t had been and continued to be fully their responsibility to prepare and process all necessary documents and obtain Caltrans' approval, including any necessary agreements. The original modiftcatlon request also suggested wording regarding "substantial campietion' of street Improvements and landscaping. The City Engineer has stated that standard poitcy already allows him to release proportional occupancy once public improvements are sufficiently complete to allow safe traffic circulation. This would include functioning traffic signais which might still have a correction punch list. IV. CONCLUSION: These issues were discussed at the Planning Comission hearing, and 1t was determined Dy the Caamiission that the conditions were appropriate as written. If the Council concurs, staff will return with a Resolution of Dental. Respectfully submitted, i,~ e ~~~. /~ /,~~~~~ / RN~t:BR d Attachments: Appeal Letter Planning Co~isslon Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Resolutions I53 f. IL59w f..... ~ .. .. .- .~..~ x0,u as - _. D -isECE:~J- -.rty~ annanaxavwowc/ " Lewis Homes Manageu-ent Corp. °`"""'"~ ~'0N 1156VvfhMOimuioA"muerP.O.eox670/UFlxca,Glitomla91785 JAN,281990 71Q985-0971 FART 714.981-8799 7 e ~~M-M ~~ January 18, 1990 IB1~!~ ? ._•_ " ,The City-of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P:O: Box 807' " Aandho ~CUCamgnpa~,~CA 91730 Re: Conditions of~~Target occupancy CUP 98-12 ~ - Terra"Vista Toirtl Cantor Rancho Cucamonga, CL "' Dear Ms. 9ong:.~~ ~~ -~ ~- ~The Planning Commission danied,at their meeting of January 10, ' 1990, 'the request oP Western Land Properties to modily the '~ conditions of CUP 80-12 referenced above. Leciis Homes ManagemariG Corps, the AuthoriEad Agent Por Western Land __~ .:.... ........r.,. ~ncnnnhA:l7v n~eala this decialon and ragnests " that the city Council hear our appeal as soon as possible. '.. gi y yours,. . ~-~ R chard A. roger '- E eeutive Directo of Commerclal~Davaiopment ~RAM:cs _. ~ ~ ~ ' .. ~~ RAM: 1550. ~ ~ ' t Mot b Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt ~ esolution approving Envi Assessment and Tentative Par 12348, with modification to provi a rivate trail con asemertt with special paving and landscaping from et ear Creek Chbnnel. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ESLEY, CHITI TOLSiOY, MEINBERBER NOES: COMM RS: NONE ABS ~ COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried + t : t . H. 88-12 AND PARCEL MAP 11030 - ncoicrcn rrcvrcrc uc~ - w request co mvvi ry atonal sivn or approval requi r7ng a r'tTi-t a~E~fi~c s goals be constructed prior to occupanq~ of any buildings for the development of a shopping center and related Parcel Map, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. - APk: 1077-421-36, 37, and 40. Betty Miller, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the requested change included the signal at Foothill and Spruce. Ms. Miller responded affirmatively. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Vrnp awry ~cn la uVlNta, YYtl VN, Vpla lnl, au UCU LIIaV IIC was WIWCI'IICU because the opening of Target might be delayed because a signal is not constructed several blocks away frae the center. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the Target store will generate much traffic and Spruce Avenue will help divert some traffic from Haven. He felt Lhe signal at Spruce and Foothill {s important to aid Sn the moveaent of the traffic on Spruce. Chairman McNiel felt it would be hazardous to go from Spruce to FootMll without a signal. Commissioner Tolstoy felt Spruce would be used by many residents who live north of the center, and it was therefore critical that the light be operational. Rick Mager, Nestern Properties, P. 0. Box 670, Upland, stated that Target's opening date is scheduled in a small window of time seL by Target. Ne felt it would be possible t0 miss the window by only a day or two, and Target has indicated that could delay the opening by four months. He stated that Target has projected they could do approximately ten million in sales during that Planning Ceaaaisslon Minutes -16- January 10, 1990 S.~J four-month period, which would impact the City's tax revenues. He thought the signal would be installed by the opening date, but was afraid the signal might not be operational and he wanted to change the condition t0 require the signal be operational within two weeks after Target's opening. Chairman McNiel asked what caused the delay. mr. I'Igy er iivuyil~ i.imrc i n Luupe,d i.i re ayrtuaenL ireiween ,.i,e ~r C] alYi Cal Trans, which Nestern Properties thought had been executed in April 1989 but which was not executed until the start of December, with permits .not being issued by CaiTrans until the second week of December. He stated they were working i6-hour shifts and would like to work 24-hour shifts, but they cannot work without the presence of a Cal Trans inspector, and CalTrans can only provide inspectors for a two-shift operation. Don Thompson asked if there could be flexibility afforded to the Engineering Department. Chairman McNiel stated that on each project the degree of flexibility depends on the anticipated effect of the occupancy of the project. He felt the City would be more concerned about traffic safety concerns than lost sales tax revenues. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chi ti ea felt public safety is important. She felt the center will be a maior draw and it is Smportant to make it safe before the public arrives. She thought the developer's schedull ng problem should not Decome a public safety problem. MNYYI»IVIICI VIi4V,r IGI4 LII< J~1I YL< III KIiC441 V11 O> ~M1~I VI LYIIL Y> NIC other intersections for the reasons he had stated fornerly. Chairman McNiel asked if the Commissioners would consider a police attendant for the grand opening if the signal were in place but not ofl;rational. Commissioner Chittea felt uncomfortable with modifying the condition. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated he could allow occupancy so long as the signal is functional, even 1f there are still some other punch list items which need to be completed. He said the project was conditioned Lo require the signal at Foothill and Spruce to remove some of the treffic fro Haven. Chairnwn McNiel felt that problems will be caused if the signals are not operational, because accidents will be caused by impatient patrons attempting to leave the center via non-signalized exits. He stated Mestern should here followed up to be sure permits were issued. He felt 1t would be a tragedy if anyone were hurt as a result of allowing the center to open before the signals were operational. Commissioner Chi ti ea felt Target should perhaps be more flexible by a day or two. Planning Commission Minutes -17- January 10, 1990 15~ Commis sioner~Tolstoy stated he could not imagine that Target would delay an opening by four aanths because they were held up fora day or two. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Neinberger, to adopt the Resolutions denying Modifications to Conditional Use Permit 88-12 and Parcel Map 11030. Motion carried by the following vote: avFCV rnwrrccmwcwc• o~ war _~ -,;;Tl~ mi.wlrl., TOLSiDY, NEINBEROER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried t *~i~ amen a greemen o a ow a o e w n e •oo sign and ercial Center, located south of Foothill Boulevard and of Spruce Ave Dan Coleman, ncipal Planner, presented the staff repor Chairnwn McNiel a if the amendaent would affect rest of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Mr. Coleman stated that a restaurant Mr. Coleman responded it would contained in the Developmen reement Commissioner Tolstoy asked if t corn as a restaurant. Commissioner Tolstoy felt th d only affect the block 1 and Spruce is designated on the master plan. re for the hotel and the restaurant should be similar ut the sire furniture for the remainder of the development could perha a different. Mr. Coleman stated tha y be appropriate and pproval of the amendment would not preclude from happening because nonaal Design Review process will be us r Lhe entire protect. Commissioner Ch ea asked if the developer had submit the hotel changes requested at gn Review. Mr. Col esponded that the developer had submitted renderin this mbrntng but he d not had an opportunity to check to see if the chap had been McNiel opened the public hearing. Planning Coamission Minutes -18- January 10, 1990 (5 7 ~ DATE: January 10, CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Caamission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Civil Engiircer SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 AND PARCEL rcques mo y a con on o approve rcqu r ng that traffic signals be constructed prior to occupancy of any buildings for the development of a shopping center and related Parcel Map located at the northeast corner of Naren Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-421-36, 37 and 40. BACKGROUND; Conditional Use Permit 88-12 was originally approved by the Planning Cowlssion on April 27, 1988. A phasing plan was adopted on December 14, 1988. Tentative Parcel Wp 11030 was approved on November 30, 1988, and recorded on March 14, 1989. Phase I construction is underway. The applicant is requesting that the condition of approval stating that traffic signals shall De installed prior W occupancy of any bufldings be modified. Alternative wording which would allow occupancy of the Target store only upon "substantial' completion of street Improvements and installation of 3 of the 5 traffic signals is proposed. The applicant's letters are attached as Exhibit "B". II. ANALYSIS: The applicant states that due to "complications in the permit process', CM sprt daU /or FootMll Boulevard laprovements Ms been detgyed until "after ChrlsWS". The applicant indicates that a delAyed opening of tM Target stop will have "tramendcus consequences" and suggests that phasing the occupancy of Taws Center PMse I will "provide for public safety and reasonable traffic flow..." The Target store will be tM mayor traffic generator for PMse I of Town Center. Its primary access point wilt be the Foothill driveway opposite Aspon Strwt. Allowing tM ala~or traffic generator to Dacome operational without its maJor mitigation '~' ITEM N PWININ6 COIMISSIL MODIFICATION TO CUP 88-12 AND PM 11030 STAFF REPORT JANUARY 10, 1990 PAGE 2 weasurcs in place., specifically the Foothill Boulevard street ieorovenents ineludi no traffic si anals at Fnoth171/Aspen and Foothill/Spruce, is inconsistent with the concerns for traffic circulation and public safety which proapted those condttions of approval 1n the first place. Current City policy (Council Resolution No. 88-559) allows ..^Uparri.l aS 'yrvyertivi~ate w the cd7pietlen of i~pravewent5. Therefore the condition as currently rrltten provides sufHNent flexibility to allow occupancy of the Target Storc once the signals and other street inprovenents are sufficiently coaplete to allow safe operation of the traffic circulation systee. I[I. RECOIaNiNDATION: Staff rccowaends tMt the roquest for sgdifteatton be denied. If after consideration of all input, the Planning Cow.isston concurs with this recaaawmdation, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Respectfully sudsitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civ11 Enalneer BRN:BM:Iy Attachaknts: Site PMstng Plan (Exhibit "A") Applicant's letters (Exhibit 'B") Applluble Colullttons (Exhibit "C") City Council Resolution No. 88-557 (Exhibit "D') Resolution of Denial -Conditional Use Panait 88-12 Resolution of Denial - Parcel !qp 11030 I5~ ~,.: -.~ r B, ~-` ~~ ~ o --- JI v -~ -- - ~_ ~~- _ ~. --:-; ~; - - , =~ ~~ .~~ r- z i z~ U O ~ WESTERN PROPERTIES 11lA Ndm Ma"Y"In M,Ma / ~O. w. t)0 / UobiA. G W)M / ]It NbeV71 December 20, 1989 VZA MZ88EH6ER ~,~ Planning Division - , ~~ ~ •~ City of Rancho Cucamonga '"s '~' P. O. Box 807 (( ~'~ ~ ~, .~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 f`y~~ ~~ Attn: Nancy Fong c~~~,~t/ c Re: t-0odification of CUP 88-12 ~~ y~i Gentlemen: weed Like to expand on our above-referenced request, riled earlier, by suggesting that the Coniesion may wish to consider phasing the occupancy of "Phase I" of Town Center, much as was done by Resolution SS-276A for the antis project. For exempla, the new resolution could state that "Occupancy of the Target atom will require substantial completion o! all street improvemance maven, roocnira, gown canter uriva and Spruce Avenw) immediately adjacent to and surrounding Town Center, completion of the Foothill/Haven signal modification, the installation o! the Navan/Town Center end Spruce/Town Center signals, and aubstantiel progress on landscaping and other requirements of Resolutions SS-75, 118 and 236A. No occupancy shall be permitted in Buildings A or B until all requirements for Fhaae I era fully completed, including installation of signals at Foothill/Aspen and Foothill/Spruce." The suggested, or similar, wording seen to ma to provide for public safety and reasonable traffic floc chile giving Target, the biggest sales tsx producer, the assurance they'll need to pin dove and plan their opening. And whit we intend to complete all required improvements as expeditiously as possible in eny avant, it would also force us to do so before any of our own tenants could open. Hopefully, then, this approach could make both the City end Target happy. EXHrerr Q : roc Planning Division City o! Rancho Cucamonga December ?0, 1989 Page 2 Have a good holiday. sincerely, WESTERN PROPERTIES Donald Y.: Tho sor. Authorized Agent DMT:ad cc: .~ Engineering Division ~, Attn: Russ Maguire ~ l~ ~ EXHIBIT 3~ 2oF~ `~. ~- WESTERN oROPERTtES 115! NaT Abuilan MryS / 10. b 57a / u~. G qnN / N~ NSpN December 15, is89 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box an7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ++tyopREie~wopry~E~O~-,., ,W DEC Is ~ ~~I~H.b 7,o.e Re: Modification of Reaoi::t ion 88-75/CUP 88-12 Gentlemen: we now have our Cal-Trans permit and are poised to begin work on Foothill Boulevard !n connection with the Town Cantor project. Mowevar, and I believe the City 8ngineer can attest to this, wa suffered unusual complications in the permit process, unforeseen by anyone, which delayed our start data by approximately three full months. Inataad of having the Poothill work completed by now, as we had anticipated, we wont W stsrtinq until otter Christmas. As we pushed the permit process along a! ebsolutaly the fastest rate wa could, and •inee the delays rata not of our tusking, we must ask, in view of the tramandoua cena.m,.n.... «._. m.....-. _ City, and ourselves, of a dale ed o ~ ~~- Resolution 88-75 ba slightly modiiiW to glVi tlpia City Engineer soma discretion in allowing occupancy. If the words ^prior to occupancy of any buildingm^ w~ra deleted paragraph (4) would read as follows, consistent with the rant of the conditions: "Traffic signals shall be constructed at the following locations with the ability t0 coordinate tiainge: a) Spruce Avenw and' Foothill Boulevard; b) Spruce Avenue eryd Town Center Drivo; c) Haven Avenue and Town Center Drivel and d) Hain Entrance (opposite Aspen Street) and Foothill Boulevard. / (03 EXH~bIT lj: 3 ~ `~ Planning coaission City o! Rancho Cucaaonga December 15, 1989 Page 2 Alternately, "during the construction of the project" could replace the deleted phreae, and would also give the City F.nnin~~~ tA~ _..sl u.. - F.o oc --- _ -r ~.. 'y .+a. uya,wy rn nuuurtinnur ri u. noimal policy. We, of couzae, will try our best to gat all o! the street and signal work completed before the planned ogsninq of Target, the very first stors. But in ease we era not able to complete the _.42 C '..~~...,~..~..~r ~~. thr anti rr nreiact which the currant wording requires, we and the City wl11 nand the flexibility Lo allow phaaad occupancy consistent with common same and public safety. Be aaaurad that we have no desire to delay installation of any part of the improvements, and will rush them to completion as soon am pomaible, but because o! the shortened schadul• need thim requested wording cRanga to avoid potential big problems as Target's opening nears. Thank you for your anticipated eoopsrslSon. Sincerely, WESTERN PROPERTIES i /~ Donald N. TROm on Authorized Agent ONT:ad ~~~ EkHIBIT 6~ ~(dF~f CSC. SPECIAL (4) Traffic s1 nals shall be constructed at the GorJ~lT7on,: foltoring glocattons r1Lh the ability to coordinate things pr/or to occupancy of any 6W ldings; a( Spruce Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; bl Spruce Avenue and Torn Center Orive; I.i Haven Avenue and Tam tentwl• n.rp.• ,rn d) Main Entrance (opposite Aspen SLreetl and Foothill Boul everd. 5719n,i~,l,zp ConID177oNS: ~. .rlgrM xtlYnl I/IM Nglw YW .,YL.I-Y. Y Y IleltrW w k M YIIWIN W r F (ki (glwl'1 nxlrtwtrt. >~1, iin ll~lillr~ p[y Hr~ wll q Yryuw u W (ur IrMYq. l {lml INr..~,lll I LWIrKt IIII. IlrNl Wrtr~ll IYIMM. M W 141t1t q. tIN lwN MI W. .[. r.rll~ IYw N. Ylw rp~rk qNy trltt /NI 1111 w NI qWq rllt IVlllt. _ t Nnllq N ]f.IW NY wr~l Nqq t IF1tl1 NY Ut14M /IYL.LNI WII q tWlrwltl lw NI Y11.NllN .VMN, ~. LWINeI W gI1wIM IYgtrnt 141NIMr M Itl IMW q: ' n/.( .. `~ ; I ~>•;. ui 411. lWlll ' .T Ify pip tt'n.: k is III f r, ^ nClnKr ~. C ~ IW IYlwn lM1Yl w ~I I; WII M an111Wr pr 1N M. NI IYNr Iq II.~IIN Iwl WII M rr Mpr r Ylw, Itl L.M IIIY Nr~ll x tNtlr !r W Ilr Y MIM. Ll wtx Y W rrt WM rlgrM q IM IrNI< NM N+q. Itll II It Mlt W r W.lYl~l flMl WII Y WNYr /rrY Iq (III IMIYx'1 Nllq.4 Wlllr YYLWtIYM4 r1111r1I. ,L .. Nml rgrwrN NW 1lIMIM /Ylrrlt tqq r .Ilwl N(~I1( („ wrq Wll q~rl41ll1 NI111~11i 1lLp N~YI~WYr~ Ixt rl w N~illlr~7 Nillgl l Ilttprt Nil~l~ r~IM~.NI~ f t 1MNY rlw Ipr 1 r (rrl 41wyf1 WII q lgtlfll IIiN[~M NFYtl M W 1111 tMUn. rr rCLg~/,hL l f~'ii'I ,xtl. WII Y INY. r N .p....l xNNN I. Yt gtlNxNx M tilh Irlr r Y [Ib YIYrq. yxxlwrtt WNIW NI M IIYI Ily w Y 1 Wo ~I gll~~ll. Nlw Y[ Iltlt. M Ixplt. fllggtr Yqt ~ fN~ilf WI~IpY l NW Iw t~l/ tWg1 M Yt plNp tlrtlll x nplrN Iw Iw W wnttl Y rt c14 IMIrtI. f~ IMiIINyy11l y~ qN1 twYrrt n W Mrtl1 t4Mt Y Ylwt. M lit/ gpw't A/W ~1 tr111N y ~It WII M YYltlt IrN 1'tgp IYpk nplM. yG/N' ply tll llr.~l YIII q W 411w 4 W ttllNYpN N W i'1. YMl INNM. Yi1M~ Yt/Ik r l4trt Ir IIpIM WII M / INYIIN tw W Itgrltn~l~rlY~M W tl4 l/Nllt IMIw/. j lt, 4MII,X X11 l` NY~IYYNI~W ~Itt~ 11 rrY lIN Ix iryt IWN tlNll q q etYlgl. N ertftN[IY a INYN q qlw nt Wl M It11~ ~ Itll MYId Wli txi 114 611wp~Nr M Yt (pt11yNN Y M NIIIIYIIY N W ~I1. YI1Fl WII It tg11Yt INNY Nllk tlrW W N..Iw rlnr .~. ~N. tptWltW MIYII Ilfl WII r toll tlylY, rV tlMlt W W WII q W411N 4 t14 Iltlflgl. ~{. t 1wMl N11 q r141W /IN tt11tM IY y Nqk qt IL MI xl1fg11kNINY1 q rWNlIN1 Ix tMIrNt1Y N 111 s.t1I1 1l IAIM M W FIIpM M11<IN, 1. YlwfpllN f1lW NII M r141rw N W NIINIM IrIIW ~, 1. I- pylll Ir /rIIW W1w11 11 WNN NYIt t nr ruq ill. Mho. IIYII IgllttW rlyll WII Y NgIM wt111M h t illlhM Lllll inMlt r l1ArN y Yt (Ilt 1t11iO. I. t Ytlgll tflt4l Wr Ilr tnlYllr rll OII Y gYlrll u ptlil W lM1YrY i IIwIIM qw1 rwll 4 Ilrttll. r h t in rib. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SNOIIdE6[tIIdO DMBtON !~5 PPiY: CUP ~~ /2 MoD 1TPLSe~IPPG/CABLE CG1yDi77eN.S C RESOLOTION N0. 88-357 A RESOLCTION O[ TAE CITt COUNCSL O[ TAE CSTI 0[ MNCRO "..JCAtLNGM CALI[ORNIM APPROVING '[uE CITI E:Y7.^7^t'3 e4Li~Y REQUTAIN6 CONPLLTSON O[ CONDITIONS O[ APPROVAL AS A PREREQUISITE TO ENERGY ODNNECIIONS NON, TAEAEIORE, the City Cowcil of eha Ciq of RYCho Cuewon8a doss F.ar.br r_ao+_ee as toll-•e: No parson shall asks conwctiona erect • aourca of anarp. twl os povar to ao7 6ul1dio8 Ysviu aquipunt vhich is roanlatad ~ tachat.eal codes sad for vhie6 a panit is saquired unlaaa, in addition to act[ and ail other Codas, ra8ulatlooa and ordiaancaa, all faprovaawnta ragnind b1 Lha eeaditiow of davalopwat appso[al hna 6aY ewplatad and aewptad ~ tho Cit[ Council. a:tapt: That in davalop~anu coaainie8 aora ehY ow baildiy oz wit, the dovalopant aq hno owrp coawetiew v4 to • p•seonup o! thew buildiya, ez uoita proportiowta to the ewplotioa e! Lprovaaaaata Y zgnieod condieiow of appswal e! davalopwot. In m cue ahdl mro ehY ein•t~-tiro poreant (pit) o! eha buildlnp or snits D• cowoetad eo owtp pesos to co~plation sad aecaptYea o! all iopro[aaonta rpaitad ~ eW conditions of appzonal of davalopuot. PASSW. APPRDp<D. and AIN)Km LM. Ito Aw .~ a». ~>,~:. _. . AlE3i 6ugwt, EiaB, NeiBht, Esoon, 8tont NOES: Nona AS SEIRs Now Doaais L. twt, Ngot ATTEST: ~-Af~N~ Ew•rlp A Auch•i•t, Ciq L1~_ ~~~ Exkrair D RESOLUTION NO. 90-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCMp16A PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF A CONDITION OF ADPROYAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-12 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF HAIEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN 1077-M21-36. 37 A1~ 40 A. Recitals. (i) On April 27, 1988, the Planning Taawisslon approved, subject to specified conditions, CoMttlonal Use Perett 88-12 which orov/des for the developrent of an inkgrekd Coa~ntfy Shopping Cenkr on 71 acres at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. (it) On Deceaber 19, 1989, a request was filed by Neskrn Properties to codify the coMition of approval requiring the deveiaper k ' construct traffic signals prior k occupancy of airy buildings. (iii) On Deceaber 20, 1989, Neskrn Properties e~anded their request k include subskntlal caapletion of street iaproveaents prior to occupancy. Essentially, the request would allow occupancy of the Target Skrc prior k coapietion of the Foothill Boulevard inproveaenLS including signals. (iv) On January 10, 1490, the Planning Coawission of the City of Rancho Cucananga conduckd a lily noticed puD11c hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that dak. (v) All legal prcrequisiks k the adoption of This Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THERffORE, 1t is hereby fount, deknined ant resolved by the Planning Coawisslon of the City of Rancho LUcaagnga as follows: 1. This Coanission hereby spetlfleally finds that all the facts set forth In the Rectkls, Part A, of this ResoluLSan are true and correct. 2. lased upon subskntlal evidence prcsenkd k tAis Co~isston during the above-referenced publ/c hearing an January 10, 1990, includinngg writkn and orel staff reports, kgether with puDllc kstl~aony, this Coa~ission hereby spetifically finds as follows: (a) The requlreaent k have street i~!groveeents and traffic signals an Foothill Boulevard coaplekd (aperetlonal) prior k occupancy of any buildings 1s necessary for public safety and traffic elrculatton; and /~/ PLANNING COMMI SSIOY aESOWTION ND. 90-07 CUP 88-12 - NESfERi ROPkRT[ES JANUARY 10, 1990 PAGE 2 (D) Current C1ty policy is wfficiently flexible to allow occupancies preportlanate to taproveaent coapletlon if public ufety 1s not coup roeised. 3. Baxd upon wbstanLtai evidence preuntsd m this Coawisston di ring N~ .-..~v.~u --fw,c~xeu ~~ ~it1- i1 M1 ~! ~W ~a - 'y iii, :fry u q..r.. .- ::y3 set forth in pareg rephs 1 and 2 above, this Coialsston hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the requtreaent Mat Footh111 Boulevard sheet iaoroveaents, including traffic sl~nels, be coapleted (aperetlonal) prior W occupancy is necesxry era reasonau,e. 4. Baxd upon the findings and conclusions set forth in pareg rephs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Coawlssion hereby denies the requested condition aadlfication. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Coawlssion sha11 certify to the adoption of this Resoiutian. APPRDIED ANO ADOPTED THIS 10tH DAY OF JANUARY 1990. PLANNING COMyI,SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIWDNGA 8Y ATTEST: [, Otto Kroutll, Oeputy SeeneUry of the Planning Coawisslon of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaaarga, do herby certify Mat the foragotrg Rewiutlon res duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted Dy the Planning Coawlssion of Me City of Rancho Cucaaonga, at a regular orating of Me Planning coslssion held on the lOM dq of January, 1990, by Me following rote-toirlt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, HCNiEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NDES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r0~ >~. :.n RESOLUTION ND. 90-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCMpNGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF A COIalIT10N OF APPROVAL FQt PARCEL IMP 11030, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CQINER OF HAVEN AIENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN 1077-421-36, 37 AND 40 A. RecT talc. (i) On Novewber 30, 1986, the Planning Coawisston approved, subJect to specified conditions, Tentative Parcel Map 11030 for subdivision of 71 ac its IniY 1C par~.eis at the nOrtirla tt COrnlr Of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Parcel Map 11030 recorded on FNrch 14, 1989. (it1 On DeceAtier 19, 1989, a request was filed by Nestern Properties to modify the cordltton of approval requiring the developer to construct traffic signals prior to occupancy of aryl buildings. (iii) On Deceaber 20, 1989, Ikstern Properties er~anded their request to include substantial coapietton of street lagrovearents prior to occupanry. Essentially, the request would allow occupancy of the Target Store prior to cayletion of the Foothill Boulevard taproverents including signals. (iv) On January 30, 1990, the Planning Losaission of the City of Rancho Cucaaronga condreted a duly noticed pubNc hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) Ail legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THERffORE, it is hereby found, deterarined and resolved by The Planning Coawisslon of the CiQr of Rancho Cucasarga as follows: 1. This Walaisslon hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the ReelLls, Part A, of this Resolution arc true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cosr+lssion during the above-relerenced public hearing on Januery 10, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, to ether with puD11c tsstlapny, this Coaartsston heroby specifically finds as fellows: (a) The requlreslent to have street 1 rovaerents and traffic signals on Foothill Boulevard caaappleted (apentlonall prior to occupancy of any buildings is necessary for puD11e safety and traffic circulation; and /~9 PLANNIN6 COMNISSI' RESOLUTION N0. 90-08 PM 11030 - IIESfEF', ,MIOPERTIES JANUARY 10, 1990 PAGE 2 (b) Current L1ty policy is sufficiently flexible to allow occupancies proportionate to improvement campletlm if public safety is not compromised. 3. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Cawatssion dart no the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of farts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Coanissian hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the requirement that Foothill Boulevard street L=rrove~rts, ?.^.tl_Ctrg traffic signals, Sa compietea (operational) Drior to occupancy is necessary and reasonable. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the requested condition modification. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Caanission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 1990. M '. "y!.; PLANNING CONNI,SSION OF THE CITT OF RAMCIp CUCANON6A BY ATTEST: I, Otto Krautil, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coa~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do Hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Otanntng Camaisston of the City of Rancho Wcas»nga, at a regular neetliq of the Planning caswlssion held on the 10th d4y of January, 1990, Dy the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CpMISSIONERS: NOES: COMl1I5510NER5: ABSENT: CpMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, MEINBERGER NONE NONE 170 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7. 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad 8u11er, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SU&IECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT, EIGHTH I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends ~iaf-they ouncll approve the attached resolution designating the Cucamonga Depot as a Historical Landmark because it meets the criteria far designation in the Historic Preservation Ordinance and because designation may help to preserve the building for a useful life in the future. II. DACKGRDUND: The Cucamonga Depot has came to our attention because e~fTi owner, the Atchison/Topeka and Santa Fe Railway, sent a letter informing the City of their intention to demolish the building. Thn hn/ldi nn hoe honn nl ~~„eA 60 .anAal~ew anA ~m1_yi_A wn ~.... The City responded to the letter by ,asking for time to assess the historical significance of the building. At the November 2, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Staff asked the Commission members if they wished to set a date for a designation hearing for the depot. The response by the Commission was unanimous Lo schedule the depot for public hearing in December. On Decembor 7, 1989, the Historical Preservation Commission recoeamended to the City Council purchasing (when available), for a token amount, the Cucamonga Depot and designating it as a Historical Landmark. III. DESCRIPTION SUMMARY: A. Location: The location of the Depot is on the north side of EigTitil-Street, east of Archibald Avenue. The site 1s currently zoned Industrial Park, Subarea 7 in the Industrial Specific Plan. fie area surrounding the site is predominantly vacant, zoned Industrial Park and General industrial. However, there are existing residences to the south. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUCAMONGA DEPOT February 7, 1990 Page 2 B. Si nificance: According to Neil Leverton, the Santa Fe d MdY eoresentati ve that GTaii r.~+ ~++,~~ ~:6 Tu'yeno iiCe records show 1945 to 6e the date of~ construction of~ the present Depot on the site of the original 1087 Depot. The post Norld Mar II years saw huge volumes of produce shipped from this building. Commissioner Cooper indicated, at the November 2, 1989 Historical Preservation Commission meeting, that the 6epot is significant in the fact that it was used to ship grapes to the east coast and all over the United States. Furthermore, according to David Cameron, a Santa Monica Preservationist knowledgable of railroads, the more modern style, such as the Cucamonga type are disappearing faster than the older Victorian style. Lynn Merrill, Historical Consultant to the City, believes that this style of railroad station mqy be one of the last in Southern California. It should also be noted that while the station was in operation it acted as the activity center for the Old Cucamonga Coamm~ity. C. Issues: Currently, the Atchison/Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad property is for sate. The San Bernardino and Los Angeles Association of Governments are looking into the purchase of the line for a fuWre commuter rail line. Upon whom or whatever organization purchases the railroad line, the opportunity will exist for the structure to 6e moved and refurbished to serve as a portion of a new transportation ..~j... .. ..~ ..no .. yC. yJ x. IV. CONCLUSION: Staff recomaends that the City Council approve the s oA~ r~cal-Landmark designation for the Cucamonga Depot because of its important role in the life of the caawunity of Rancho Cucamonga and because of its architectural type which was once common but now rare, and thus making it historically significant to the City. Re;, lly Itted, r Rra @ pr ~ ~ City anner BB:JG/j fs Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report, Minutes and Resolution of December 7, 1989 City Council Resolution of Approval ~~ ., '.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~,.T~: TO: FROM: eY: JYiCMfYC i' i , iiai Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission Larry Henderson, Principal Planner arl ana n,nke acer„is to Dlannor SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT EIGHTH STREET ~~• C TNTEREST-AI - I. BACKGROUND: The Cucamonga Depot has come to our attention ecause a owner, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Rallwafy, sent a letter informing the City of their intention to demolish the building. The building has been plagued by vandalism and unlawful entry. The' City responded to the letter by asking for time to assess the historical significance of the building and determine if the City is interested in purchasing or leasing tt. At the November 2, 1989 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, staff asked the Consaisslon meabers if they wished to seta date far a designation hearing for the depot. The unanimous response .,, .".a..._ ..~,._ On TuesdAy, Novemter 21, 1989, staff and Commission member Melicent Arner met with a representative of the Railway, Neal Leverton, at the site and inspected the interior of the building. II. SITE LOCATSON AND DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The Cucamonga Depot is located on the south side of e n a Fe ratiroad tracks, east of Archibald on the north side of Eighth Street, a few feet from the "T" intersection of Belnwnt and Eighth Street. The parcel on which it stands is a narrow piece of land running alongside the tracks, extending from Archibald east to Haven. For th15 report, the "site" is the land on which the depot stands. B. Site Land Uses Zoning, and General Plan Designation: The site or ine aepot 1s a bare patch of lam wo or ree eet above street level, with no landscaping. Dirt, asphalt paving, end en old weighing platform characterize the area surrounding the building. 173 ITEM B IIPC STAFF REPORT CUCAMONGA DEPOT December 7, 1989 Page 2 The Development Districts Map shows that the Depot is within the Industrial Area Specific Plan, in Subarea 17, "Industrial i.r anal iivv tmie if(Na mur'c iii l2rii iYe industrial or commercial°activities to residential areas. New development in this zone is required to be especially sensitive to the surroundings. The General Plan shows railroad use for the site. C. Surrounding Land Use, Zoning, and General Plan Desi gnatton: North: -Land Use: Railroad tracks. Zoning: Subarea 17 in the Industrial Specific Plan (Industrial Park 1. General Plan Map: Railroad. South: - Land Use: Residential. ioning: Subarea 4, Industrial Area Specific Plan (General Industrial). General Plan Map: General Industrial East: - Land Use: Railroad use/vacant. Zoning: Subarea 17, Industrial Area Specific Plan. General Plan Map: Railroad Nest: - land Use: Railroad use/vacant. Zoning: Subarea 17, Industrial Area Specific Plan. General Plan Map: Railroad. Description: The Cucamonga Depot is a simple, rectangular, nn"_e_e nr~y 6_uildi nn yi~h e...w,hh eb,nn~ ,..1L . tt _t ...s horizontal band along the~roofline, and a band of horizontal grooves a few feet beneath the roofline. These features, as well as the rounded overhang above the assyme tical north entrance, classify the style as "Art Moderne". The depot has entrances on both the street Arid track sides, and several boarded up windows and freight doors. °Cucamonga" is painted on the upper portion of the east, north, and west walls, and "Santa Fe" on the south wall. Far pilasters, the outer two wide, the inner two narrow, enliven and add a sense of strength to the highly visible west side. Graffiti is sprayed all over the building, and fire has damaged the northeast portion. The inside of the depot has been vandalized; graffiti covers every surface and broken glass, trash, and smashed splinters of wood litter fAe f19Or, The interior design is plain and simple, divided into three parts: a smell public waiting roam with bathrooms, an office section with numerous built-1n cabinets, and a lower and upper freight area. The construction materials and design of the freight section lead staff to believe that it was part of the original 1887 depot, witA the envelope of the new building constructed around 1t. ~7~ Ii PC STAFF REPORT CUCMWNGA DEPOT December 7, 1989 Page 3 B. Significance: ~+~_~"+trn7: The railroad came through the town in 1887; fE contributed to the cucaawnga Doom years, ine train depot built at that time was a typical Victorian stnxture of wood with a steeply pitched roof and generous overhang. According to fnfonaation given to Melicent Arner by Lynn Merrill, historical consultant, the Santa Fe rail line was constructed through North Cucamonga about the first of March, 1887, and the depot completed by the end of the following October. The station served as a telegraph office as well as a passenger and freight station. According,to L19ht Over the Mountain by Donald Clucas, the building Nas sever y amage in the "big wind" of December 13, 1887, which also destroyed the nearby newsy constructed tbrth Cucamonga Motel. The energetic townspeople soon rebuilt both buildings, however, and the train station was back in business, it proved vital to the growing community, enabling orchard crops, citrus, and grapes to be shipped Lo the world, and people to travel from place to place more easily. According to Neal Leverton, the Santa Fe Railway representative that staff met with, the Topeka office records show 1945 to be the date of construction of the ~rL+r.••. .. p.... yJSt'v1r fcui S -du iuyc 'iuiudivi 4i produce shipped fray this building. Furthernare, according to Santa Nonica preservatlanist David Cameron who is especially knowledgeable about railroads, the more modern depots are disappearing faster than the older ones. i,ynn Merrill believes that this style station may be the last of its kind in Southern California. Staff thinks that this semi-public building played an important role in the life of the community and is a type of building that was once common but is now rare and thus has historical significance. Commission member Hesitant Arner will be researching newspapers for articles abrat the depot once the month of its opening is known; and member Ada Cooper will be looking for infonmattan Tn her flies. This research will document the history of the building and help further establish its significance. 2. Architectural: TAe Art Moderne style, according to A FfeTd'-Guide ~Eo Aserican Mouses by Virginia and lee es er, was u man y rom about 1920 to 1910. I7~ IiPC STAFF REPORT CUCAm10NGA DEPDT December 7, 1489 Doge 4 It was influenced by the "streamlined industrial design for ships, airplanes and automobiles. The sarooth surfaces. curved corners. and hnrixn~rat a,w,haete ,.s the Art Mederne style all give the feeling that airstreams could nave smoothly over their;.." (p.465) Although the depot is a simple building, it's Art Moderne style, a rarity in Rancho Cucamonga, glues the buiidiiy more ar2h;ii,i iu jai Sty nifiCai,te '.`„a' ii ai iynt have if this style were common. Staff concludes that the building's distinctive architectural style, simple though it ruy be, is significant. Property maintained and landscaped, staff can imagine this building looking far more attractive and making an important _ contribution to the arch tectural diversity of the City. 3. Issues: The Railwary corgagy wishes to have the depot ~.a e~ff their hands because it has served its purpose and now is only a maintenance problem. M issue of importance is whether the City would want to purchase or lease this building and possibly eventually nave it to serve as a new transportation depot ar for sane other use. (A mat or portion of the building 1s on a poured concrete foundation; moving it may be difficult, but by no means impossible). The Comtiission needs Lo consider whether the building 1s of sufficient interest to warrant recomimnding not only the designation of the building, but also to reconrrend that the City Council negotiate with the railway campagy to purchase it for future City use. it should be noted that the depot is located within the City's Redevelopment Protect Area, and a future trensportatlon center will likely be located within the Redevelopment Protect Area. C. Environmental Assessment: Deslynations are exempt from r c e c on 153081. tV. FACTS FOR FiIAINGS: Staff finds that the Cucamonga Depot meets severa cr era or designation faun6 in Section 2.24.690 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. A. Historical and Cultural Signlflcance: 1. The proposed landmark 1s particularly representative of an historical style. 7 C~ HPC STAFF REPORT CIICMIONGA DEPOT December 7, 1989 Page 5 >. ~a ~:a o Tha mm~neoA LnA~wr4 ie an nxamnle Of a tVOe Of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is connected with a bust ness and use which was once con~non but is now rare. a. The site is the location of an important historic building. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. I. The propose landmark in its location represents an estaDl lShed aM familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city. (Ord. 70 59,1979). V. CORRESPOIOENCE: ThTs item has been advertised in fie Deity eporl['-f, owners within 300 feet have been notified, and staff has met with and corresponded with representatives of the railway company. yl. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation s'fome s a{-i n recow~end to the City Cauncll the designation of the Cucamonga Depot as a landmark because it meets the criteria for designation in the Historic Preservation Ordinsnce, and because designation mqy help to preserve the building ror a usetui iiie in the future. Respectfully submitted, (~derson, Principal Planner LH:AB:,1s Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Hap Exhibit "B" - Photographs Exhibit "C" -Resolutions ~~~ r...~ ,.. t_` ~~. a ';.,,, i~ C~oamony. n.yot 1Y ?.P i ~" 178 Nf STORtC PRESERVATION COMMiSStON LANDMARK SURVEY AddreaR:. r AP1: ' ~ i' ~ ` i . [6 CQ..-f a*'de V lbw Looking .,..w ..,~+ . Date of Photo ~~ t i . ' ~~^' ~ ~~,, i r: i I I Weyf'sr~e View Lovk ing C~s1 Date of Photo N-P9 . Page of Pages. LJH2 I kI1S'fuu ll' PNSC uVATl ~N ' ~ Nl«1 ~N AN ~MAUg SURVEY Address: Cu ram ~no~/ API: ~' ~ ~~* ` I ~~ .' ~; ~. Southsrde. VS~w Look Snq /~~r fL) Date of Photo II~Q~ I I ~ norm side, View Look lnq GJS'~ Oate of Photo kk"g` _. Pag• _ of Pagec. LJN2 Imo CCMIISSIONERS: BILLINGS, BANKS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, R, COOPER, PRESTON NOES: 0lMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENTe f. SSIONER+ NDNE --carried i MOTION: Moved by reston, second y Banks to amend the Resolution, Condition No. 1 to st that in event the applicant is unable to attain satisfactory financing, ~e s ure shall De returned to the appearance shown on Sheet 3 of the pi - aied November ii, i9B9. the motion carried 'vy the following vote: AYES: Cpe1I SSi PRE BANKS, HASKYITZ, COOPER, ARNER, SCFMIDT, BILLI NOES: ISSi0NER5: NONE COlMiSSI0NER5: NONE --carried f fi fi f f B. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT. EIGHTH STREET. EAST OF Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. ~i~d ii nob $i,i~i~i, diwcu ' ~iic ."w iii you uoS iw~cu u,dQ w,c~ wuuiu ue wiii iriy to sell it for almost nothing. Mrs. Banks responded that the term "token amount' has been used and that the Railroad has not officially responded. Chairman Schmidt asked if the City bought the depot, would there 6e a deadU ne to move it. Mrs. Banks responded that tt would be negotiated. Commissioner Banks asked if a condition of purchase would be cove 1t. Mrs. Banks responded that it would be up to the City Council and the Railroad. HPC MINUTES -3- DECEMBER 7, 1989 J ~' .P Comsissioner Banks stated there was talk of using the depot for the proposed railroad being reactivated. She felt this could be focal point instead of Haven Avenue. Mr. Henderson stated the site is too narrow to accommodate the 320 parking spaces needed. There is same incompat1611 icy In termis of ex_i_sting land .. . arync c to YPr U,c ~edtliiniiw IWil the~CT ty ,~~Naven Avenue it. ~~Naven Avenue is dot igned as the ~Ctty's mw,lor access as far employment goes. Commissioner Preston asked if this is an Amtrak passenger line now or is the southerly line the passenger line. Commissioner Billings responded they Doth are. Commissioner Preston stated he had same concerns with this building and that it vas nct signiftcart, but the report has changed that. Ne commented that he would like the Resolution amended to describe the building further 1n the findings and what facts are to support them. He stated that If someone goes to the City Clerk or Department Secretary and wants to see on what Oasis the Commission made its decision, it is always easier to have those in the Resolution. Commlss toner Banks questl oned If the Cowmission has owner consent. Mrs. Banks responded the City has owner knowledge of what is happening and have not had an owner objection. Commissioner Haskvitz questioned what the estimated cost would be to move the structure. Mr, Hender50m responded that stair nay nOL IOOKed 1nL0 eny Or Lnat f nformati on. Chairman Schmidt opened the public Rearing. Hearing no response, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Preston, seconded by Arner to recommend to the City Council the purchase, for a taken amount, and landmark designation of the Cucamonga Depot located on Eighth Street, east of Archbald, and direct staff to further define the findings 1n the final Resolution to reflect the staff report. The motion carried Dy the following vote: HPC MINUTES .4. BECF?IBER 7, 1989 /R RESOLUTION N0. 89-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CUCAMONGA DEPOT LOCATED AT ARCHIBALD n...m;c. iv,~v caun,n a,ItcCl !W A WexM1aC NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Coaslssion has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all coasaents on the proposed Landrark naet~nsr{nn_ NHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Caa~issian has received and reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation. NHEREAS, all legal prcrequisltes to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NON, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Cosission hereby specifically finds, detereines, and rcsotves as follows; SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Nu ea~'r 101-062-04. SECTION II: The proposed landsark is significant historically and architecture y. onstructed on the site of the original 1887 depot and incorporating a portion of the orginat freight rocs, the building was constructed in 1945. It is now one of the last of this style depot in Southern California. Furihengre, the depot played an important role in the i ife ~r the community. wi cuough a siapie our iarng, tt rs also important architecturally because 1t is in Lhe Art Moderne style, a rarity in Rancho Cucamonga. It thus contrlb~tes to the archltecural dlverstty of the City. The proposed landmark meets the following criteria established Tn Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance 1. The proposed iandswtrk is particularly representative of an historical s;y1e, tM Art Moderne style. 2. The proposed landmark is an exasgle of a type of building which was once cosmxM but is now rare, namely, a Norid Nor II-era depot. 3. fie proposed landmark is connected with a business and use which wss once commn but is now rare; 1L enabled citrus, orchard crops, and grapes to be shipped all over the world. 1~3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSSON RESOLUTION N0. 89-03 CUCAMONGA DEPOT Decendter 7, 1989 Page 2 4. The site is the location of an iaportant historic building, the original 1887 depot. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. fie proposed landmark in its location represents an established and fam111ar viwal feature of the neighborhood, caamunity and city. (Ord. 70 59,1979). SECTION I;I: Designation of a landmark is exaspt from CEQA (Arti_le 19, aea.u on aawor. SECTION IY: Based on the substantial evidence meived and reviewed by thisTama~ssfon and Dosed on the findings set forth above, NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Caawisslon does hereby recaaxnd approval of destgnatton of the _ Cucamonga Depot as a landmark. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1989. HISTOAS+~ C IS N OF THE ITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 11\\ o im a man AYES: COIMISSIONERS: PRESTON, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, SCNMIDT, BILLINGS NOES: CpMISSI0NER5: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE k- u. ~: M''... a'+c~ "5.5. /~~ RESOLUTION NO. ~7f1 _ ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECpMEi®ING APPROVAL OF THE w..w ......w. w.wwr ,nw.rro .r r,n,rtu crnerr ",n "oruTOpn AYENUE, AS A LANDMARK - APN: 207-062-04 -- -- NHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider ail coawents on the proposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution no. 8g-G3 approving the said as a Landmark. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input regarding said Landmark Designation. NHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NON THEREFORE, the City Council hereby specifically finds, determf nes, and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The applicatton applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Nu er - 2-04. SECTION II: The proposed landmark is sfgnificant historically and architectural-Constructed on ilia site of the original 1887 depot a~ incorporating a portion of the orginal freight roam, the building was constructed in 1945. It is now one of the last of this style depot in wl- ~.t~i.....I. C..~. «A. M.w An n~ ..1 ...nA i.w.. w~anf n_ln in hFn life of the caamunity. Although a simple building, itris also important architecturally because it is Tn the Art Moderne style, a ratify 1n Rancha Cucamonga. It thus contributes to the architecural diversity of the City. The proposed landmark meets the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance The proposed landmark is particuiarty representative of an M storical style, the "Art Moderns" style. 2. The proposed landmark is an exmaple of a type of building which was once comaon but is now rare, namely, a Norld Nar II-ere depot. 3. The proposed landmark Ts connected with a business and use which was once camaon but 1s now rare; it enabled citrus, orchard crops, and grapes to be shipped alt over the world. l~5 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. CUCAMONGA DEPOT Febniary 7, 1990 Page 2 a. me site is the iocati on or an important m store building, the originai 1887 depot. e. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. Tne proposed landmarK in its locaiion represents an esiabii;ile:1 a~.d familiar viwal feature of the neighborhood, conn~unlty and city. (Ord. 70 59,1979). Y' ~~. ~' SECTION III: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sect on SECTION IY: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this ou~C nciT and based on the findings set forth above, NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve designation of the Cucamonga Depot as a iandmark. I ~W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1980 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FR011: Brad Buller, City Planner gy• o..ett 4,....o. a~sM late of _~~_. SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LENIS NOMES - M appeal of the ann rtg omm ss on s ec s on o ny a request for a time extension Fora residential subdivision and design review of 46 single family lots on 13.98 acres of land in the Terra Wsta Planned Community designated Low-Medium Oenslty (4-8 dwelling units per acre) located at the ~uuttwest corner of 7er~~a Ylsta Parkwdy and Mountain Yiew Drive - APN: 227-151-13 and 14. I. STATUS OF APPEAL: This Item was continued from the last City Dune mee ng n order to allay time for the City Attorney to research the issues raised by the Council at their January 17, 1990 meeting. The City Attorney will report his findings to the City Cmmril tnninht The staff report of January 17, 1990 is attached for your information. Res t ly e , Bra City P nner BB:BH:sp Attachment: Exhibit "A" -City Courteii Staff Report of January 17, 2490 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 17, 1990 T0: Mayor and IR!moers of crle :.i L~ ew r~i ~ FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 13703 - LENTS HOMES - M appeal of the znn ng mm ss on s ec s on eny a request for a time extension fora residential subdivision and design review of 96 single family lots on 13.98 acres of land in the Terra W sta Planned Coawunity designated law-Medium Density l4-8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of Terra W sta Parkway and Mountain W ew Drive - APN: 227-151-13 and 14. I. REC014ENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council up~ffie Planning Coasission~s decision to Berry the applicant's request for a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 13303 through adoption of the attached M1CJV IY4I W,• 1I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13303 was approved by the ann ng omission on December 9, 1987. The applicant, Lewis Homes, requested an extension on the tentative map 1n order to allow them additional time to record the final map. At its December 13, 1989 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution of Denial for the extension based on the fact that the project does not meet the Terra Wsta development standards approved by City Council on December 6, 1989. lit. ANALYSIS: The tract was Resigned to border the proposed DrcTiara-Avemie on the south. This street has since been deleted in Terra Wsta Planned Community Antendment 89-O1, vdrich was approved by the Gity GOliilCii on Dacesbar 6, 1989. In addition, the interior local public streets do not meet the current Terra Vista standard. The local street standard was changed with the Dlanned Community intendment to include landscape parkways between the curb and sidewalk consistent with City-wide standards (66-foot right-of- wey). The pvroposed tract was designed with curb adjacent sidewaiks (46-foot rightwf-way). Therefore, since this ~. eX~lie~r- ,~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LENIS HOtffS January 17, 1990 Page 2 tract is not currently in conformance with the Terra Wsta Community Plan, a new tract map which meets the current Terra W sta standards, will need to be filed by the developer for any proposed development. The applicant maintains that the time extension should be granted because of delays in park and stormwater retention basin designs in the Terra Wsta Comaunity. The Planning Commission understood these problems but concluded thai they could not approve the time extension because of the recent ordinance revising the local public street design and deleting the portion of Orchard Avenue which bordered the tract. .Rest' lly is t Br B r City lan BB:BN:,js Attachments: Exhibit "1" -Letter from Applicant Exhibit "2" -Planning Coanission Staff Report of December 13, 1989 Exhibit "3" -Resolution No. 89-151 Exhibit "4" -Planning CoAwlssion Minutes of December 13, 1989 Time Extension Resolution of Denial ~V r ~?, s''' ;~, ., Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Maundin Avenue I P.O. Ban 670 /Upland, Glifomi~ 91785 714/985-0971 FAX: 714/981-9799 December to, r7n7 C iry derv City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Appeal - Tr. 13303 Gentlemen: - R ECEIYED- wr ac~~+ewwo~ OEC L7 ~ ~~~ V 1H ItLSJGIV tiG It Enclosed is our check for $126.00 in payment of the appeal fee on the above referenced tract map, extension of which was denied December 13th. Although I must say I appreciated chairman Mc:7ei1's sympathizing with our plight ahd attempting to work out a way to extend the approval, the Planning Commission finally determined that they could not do so hP[:a I1SP. Cif t.hP YPC:Pnt. ad()_nYIC)n ()f t}IP nrdfna nC:P alriPltAlllrt_ the Terra Vista standards. However, having had this project delayed for over a year by the stozmwater retention basin problem, and subsequently delaying its final design to work voluntarily with the Parks Commission on redesign of the adjacent greenway/park system, we don't believe that this denial was equitable, and must appeal it. Had we chosen not to cooperate with the Parks Commission in studying the park system, we could have com- pleted improvement drawings and had the tract recorded well before the PC street standards were amended (over our rela- tively mild objections) .to conflict with those under which this tract was designed. While a builder obviously never likes to delay a project in a hot market, we did so in an atte:^.p*_ to work ,'ith the city in improri.^.g the part. eyctem, and now have not only managed to miss the market, but also face having to scrap our many thousands of dollars in com- pleted improvement drawings to return to square one, delaying the project still another year or so. CxH/gir ! l9~ City of Rancho Cucamonga December 26, 1989 Page Two Pl° reccnsider ~e _re ~:illin^y to vcr;: th CP.C -:dui staff°while we wait for our appeal to be heard, as it°seeme to us that the Planning Commissions grounds for denial may not be all that difficult to address. N .>>. LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA ~~~ Donald Th mpson Authori2ed Agent DMT:Vs Enclosure cc: Brad Huller IRI v_ .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 13. 1969 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 1 BY: Brett ibrner, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LENIS HDMES - A res en a su v s on an es gn rev ew o s ng a amity lots on 13.98 acres of land in the Terra Vista Punned i Community designated Low-Mediw Density (4-8 dwelling units Parkway andlMountainaView Drive APN: c227-151f13 and 14ista BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13303 was approved by the Planning omm ss on on December 9, 1987. The applicant, Lewis Homes, is requesting an extension on the tentative maD in order to allow them addlttonal time to record the final map. According to the Development Code (Section 17.02.100). extensions on approvals may be granted fn twelve (12) month increments, not to exceed a total of five (5) years free the original date of approval. 1i. ANALYSIS: A. General: Staff has analyzed Lne proposed time extension with e current development criteria outlined in the Development Code and the standards in the Terra Vista Community Plan. based upon this review, staff detenained that the pro~ett does not meet the current standards in the Terra Vista Community Plan. 8. Issues: The tract was designed to border the proposed Orchard vl(-anus on the south. This street has since been deleted in the Terra Vista Planned Conmmnity Amendment 89-01, which was approved by the City Council on December 6, 1989. In addition, the interior local public streets do not meet the current Terra Vista standard. The local street standard was changed with the Planned Community AmenOeent to include landscape parkways between the curb and sidewalk consistent with City-wide standards (1.e., 60-foot right-of-why). The proposed tract was designed with curb adiacent sidewalks (i.e., 46-foot right-of- way). Therefore, since this tract 1s not currently 1n conformance with the Terra Vista Community Plan, a new tract map which meets the current Terra Vista standards, will need to be fated by the developer for aRy propsed development. 19~- ~ XNisiT a PLANNING COMMISSION FF REPORT RE: TT 13303 - LENIS NOMES Decea~ber 13, 1989 Page 2 111. I(EI.IATIERUNIlUiV: JLdrT reCOAtaends LOaL Lhe manning i.OMaission deify e app pis request fora one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 13303 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respec},fylly submitted, C Brad ~ity Pl~er BB:BN:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Time Extension Resolution of Denial 193 ~:~. ~, . Lewis Homes Management Corp. 7156 North Mouataio Aveum / P.D. Box 6701 Upland, Cali(omia 9!795 1R 71419950971 FAX: 714/991-9799 ~}'~ ~CE ~ Y { ~ ^ 4A ~~IMpm; November i, 1989 AM Nov os ~gy 7~$~~nini~1E2i8~g City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division '~ P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 k: Attention: Dan Coleman Re: Tract 13303, Tentative Map Extension Gentlemen: flecause the storm drain design of Tract 13303 was delayed for over a year by the park/basin issue and, more recently, by the raflesign of the nearby park and greenway system as reflected in Plan Amendment No. 6, our related infrastructure plena era not far enough along in the approval process to allow recording the map before its expiration. Therefore, please extend the expiration date oL the tentative map approval. we intend co scarf. yiauiuy as euwt oa uao .iuuj 6d:+oG.: is over, and start construction of the houaee in February or March. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation; a check for the $62.00 fee is enclosed. Sincerely, Lewis Homes Management Corp. _ ~ iS.._ ~ (.~ ~. Don Thomp o~,/ DMt:cs Enclosure I9~ Exh,6%~ ~1 n lITL UTIyEAiION AND NA7U~AL MtW/ IIY TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1ii0E men of w `~mYwnY `lf" mvMS auiM fuwll tfn •.•-• M MY ,l.fe I.1f p<~Y f •I,~MMf TfMT ~~ ~/ -~ ~~ - ~ - - ~!Se~t~e-~~~J ~~'._~~~_ _ ... _. .,,~_ _. _ ~---~aR r ~ ... .. I . I i ~, ,~ I ..a _ ,.~.~ ~ .. t ....f.. mss.. ~ ~I _~ ,~~ v v NORTH CITY OF ITEM• /3~3 _ KANCI-IO CLJCAMOrK'xA Trri.E, ~ o~ioa Me~~_ PI.nNN~NG aV61ON EXHIBIT ~SCAf.E: ~'~rL 19.E DETAILED SITE PLAN ^\\ TENTATIVE TRACT NO..I3303 rw~r~~n -~ 1 .1` r ~J~l~V~. -,~~~' ~'~.,~'~, ~~ ~QM ~11a~rl~lYl(~ - ~~ ( ` ~ , • 1, ~ ~' \ LL~ ~\ \ ~ 1 ~ , ~ N l~. ~ , . \ • r 1 ~ ~. w f ti•~1•"t. .f, ./" / `1 i ,, _ OrcNerd ~~crh' w~th~.,Tr,~ ~, .,T,;_,- .M _,; . _._ CITY OF rr~.~u 1T/3~3 RANCHO CLK'AMONGA Tom: 5NC Ri ?/1 PLANNING D(VLS70N ExHIBIT~ G SCALE hone.. I ~i'(P l ~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCMONGII PLANNING COMMISSION, DENYING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13303~- APN: Yt7-151-13 AND 14, AND MAKING FINDIN65~IN SUPPORT r,~~ NHEREAS, a request has Deen filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.83(b) of Ordinance 28-B, the Qbdivision Ordi.^..... .and NHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described tentative tentative tract; and NHEREAS, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that the tentative tract described herein is in conflict with the directions of fhe Terra Vista Cosamnity Plan, as amended; and NHEREAS, the tentative tract described Derein does not meet the current Terra Vista Community Plan standards, as amended, with regard to local street design and does include a portion of Orchard Avenue which was previously deleted. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamo~a Plannfig Commission hereby denies a time extension for Tentative tract 13303. Arvxurw Anu Auuvttu in15 lain uAr ur utCtln6t.H 1969. PLANNING COy7ISSI0N OF ~E `i,TY OF RANCHO CUCMIONBA BY : I~Y~., i„ v I, Br'Sd Bull,Er, Secretary of the Planning Coa~lsston of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, 330o hereby certify that the torepotng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a negulnr meeting of the P1anMnngg Commissien hN d on the 13th dqy of December, 1989, by the following vote-toinlt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, NCNIEL. TOLSTOY, NEINBERBER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY ~xH~a i r 3 197 ...*. Motioll•r, Moved by Ch it iea, seconded by Me inberg er, carried with Bl absent, adopt the minutes of Novenber 29, 1989, as anerded. R +' # F. ENVIROIMENTAL ESSMENT ANO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-29 Ew DROP INN - e request toe s a ar n a eas space o square eet withfn an existing b ldino on 1.09 acres of lard to a Commercial Office District, Subarea 3 o he Foothill Ba levard S ific Plan, located at 9583 Foothill Boulevard - 208-261-47. H. ENYIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ELOPME EVIEw 89-16 - CHILI'S - The eve opment Of a restau rant iota square eet within the Terra Vista Town Center on 1 acre of la the Community Commercial District of the Terra Yista Planned Co ty, ated at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Ba and -APN: 077-421-05. Chairman Mc Niel opened the is hearing. There were no Dublic nts. Motion: Moved olstoy, seconded by Ch ft iea, carried with esley absent, to continue viranrrental Assessment and Conditional Use Pe 89-29 and Environme Assessment and Development Review 89-16 to Jantary 10, 90. .< +: A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LENIS HOMES - A residential su v s on a esign rev ew o s rg a am y ots on 13.98 sres of land in the Terra Vista Planned Community designated Low-Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive -APN: 227-151-13 and 14. Don Thompson, Lewis Homes, P. 0. Box 670, Up lard, requested that Item A be removed from the Consent Cale rdar. Chairman McRfel opened the public hearing. Mr. Thompson stated construction had been delayed far over a year to the park detention basin controversy unto they gave in and agreed to only ono detention basin instead of the two called for in their contract. He stated they subsequently voluntarily delayed construction in order to work with the Parks Commission in the redesign of the YMCA/park site, which necessitated redesign of the storm drain. He said Lhey were now ready to proceed with plan check an the 96 single family units, which were originally approved. He Planning Commission Minutes -2- DeceMter 13, 1989 ~~CNrarr ~ 198" stated that if the time extension were denied, they would reWrn with a denser protect of probably 160 Lawn hoses. Chairman Mc Niel stated the City Council has passed an amendment with respr~t to the street widths, calling for 60 feet and the Planning Commission did not have any option other than to deny the time extension. Mr. Thompson asked if they cold keep the 46 foot-wide streets if they went to a gated comminity. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that if they went to gated streets it world be ham to find the final map to be in substantial co~liance with the tentative map. He stated at the request of Lewis, Orchard was being deleted on the southeast corner, and that also affects the map. Mr. Thoiry son stated Lewis had spoken to Shinto Bose regarding the possibility of taking the portion that was to be Orchard Ave rue and making it part of the g reenway. - Shinto Bose, Deputy City Engineer, stated he told Lewis to go through an airerdment process before finalizing the map. Chairman Mc Niel asked if the Planning Commission could delay action in order to allow Lewis time to work with Plannirig and Erg ineering on alternatives. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that during the request for ex tens ton aM/or appeal process, the time lines have been tolled and if the applicant reWrned with a f1na1 map dining that period, the City mould have to accept the map. w. T. nnn cnn a_c4 oA is twnv ~m lA annwl anA rota rn to na Ginn Rovtaw with a conpromise W do a private, gated~comminity while awaiting to go to City Council. Chairman Mc Niel asked if it would be possible to delay action and extend the existing map withat gfvfrg a full one-year extension. Barrye Hanson stated that once the request is filed, there is an automatic extension of 60 days or until the Planning Commission sts. Chairman Mc Niel asked if the final map were produced prior to Plaming Commission action, if it world be considered in co~liance even though it were not in compll ante with current code. Mr. Thompson stated he thought the final map was in for plan check for a long period prier ±o the a~rdnent, but, that Engineering had nryt aC4epted tip final beau se they were trying to resolve problems with the drainage. Barrye Hanson stated that the problems were parts of the inryroveRents of the whole Terra Vista protect and it fs Terra Vista's responsibility to cagilete the infrastructure improvements. He did not feel the Ctty slowed up the process. Plaming Commission Minutes -3- OeceaOer 13, 1989 19R Chairmen McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea felt that if the applicant were allowed time, they would go ahead and file the finai map and the City will have lost the opportunity to get a project that meets current standards. Commissioner Tolstoy stateQ there would be no opportunity for changes. Commissioner Chitiea stated that if the project were dented the developer could come back with the minor modifications needed to get it right. Choi rman vic Hiei sia te6 that ne was not responot ng to the vet fed threat of increased density. Commissioner Chitiea felt that a dental would not necessarily mean that Lewis would be allowed a denser project, as any project would still have to proceed through Design Review. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the deleted portion of Orchard still needs to be resolved. Commissioner Chitiea felt that the City should take the opportunity to get tt right. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution denying Time Extension far Tentative Tract 13303. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNI0., TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER INGJ~ VW'YI, JJIV~T J: tN t~I. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY -carried «.*:• rive tract map consisting of 145 la the Low-Medtw Density Resid per ac the Wctoria Planned corner of Ltne Road and APN: 227-081-06. _ Steve Ross, Assistant Lhe siding ta_Da cfj have siding, t [e t ror a previous family lots on 2: District (4-B ~II1 N>rfhe northeast Ellena Nest) - addition of a condition to require ~~'ee second story of ali units which 1l~~d at Oeslgn Review. asked if the aoollcant had Planning Commission Minutes -4- additional December 13, 1989 ~o~ RESOLUTION N0. RQ - Q ~g A RESOLUTION Of THE RANCHO CUCANONGII CITY COUNCIL DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNI N6 CnMMT SCTnw'c pcr rcrnR Tn nruy ~, rIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 13303 - APN: 227- 151-13, AND 14, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Hoses has filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 13303 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subiect Time Extension request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On December 9, 1987 this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 87-216, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and dine Baits, Tentative Tract No. 13303. (iii) On November 3, 1989, the applicant filed fora Time Extension of Tentative Tract 13303. (iv) On December 13, 1989, the Planning Commission adapted Resolution No, 89-151 denying the request and making findings in support thereof. (v) On December 27, 1989, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. (vi ) All legal prere~tsites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of Lhis Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including written and oral staff reports, tM s Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is not in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Terra Vista Community Plan, Ordinances, Plans, Codes and Policies; and .~ O CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. TIME EXTENSION TT 13303 - LENIS HOMES January 17, 1990 Page 2 (b) The extension of the Tentative Map will cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Terra Yista Community Plan, Ordinances, Plans, MAne .nA DNiNae• and (c) The Tentative Tract described hereto does not meet the current Terra Yista Caauunity Plan Standards, as amended, with regard to 1~a1 street design and does include a portion of Orchard Avenue which was deleted. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a Time Extension for Tentative Tract 13303. 4. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~~ fir. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I DATE: Pebruary 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Maabere of the City Council ...,.... Mere O•uaa:~ +~..1 ~1 .rr.H v~ analyst SUR.TECT: a DISH Tffi C.ae_*3 Ty~P061IC ACC6E6 COOMCIL SOeCO1GITTEE RRCOM0511D11TIOm It ie recommendetl tact the City Council raeatabliah ita Council subcoffinittee for Ca61e TV/Public Acceaa. P1ICROROVMD The City council diaaolved the Citizens Advisory Commission at ire November 1, 1989 Council meeting and in its place setebliehed the Environmental Managearent Commission. mhe AdvLory commlaeion'^ work program included the monitoring of Cable TV and Public Acceee. This portion of the AQviwry COmmission •a work program Se tae only item to be traneitioned from the Advisory Commission. Rancho Cucamonga, like other surrounding west end cities, coordinates Cable my issues entirely out of the Clty Manager's office and reports directly to the City Council on an "ae-needed" Dacia. This Subcommittee has continued to work with staff on n regular basis to diecuae Cable TV/Public Acceaa issues. The Subcommittee and staff are currently in the middle of negotletiona with Comcast CaDlevision to renew their franchise agreement. Additionally, the subcommittee, in conjunction with staff, hea begun implementing the Public Acca9e provisions of our Cable Tv franchise egzeemeni. The Public Acceee portion of our franchise agrewenk provides for tae implementation o[ a publicr educational and governmental (PEO) network Dy our franchised Cable TV operators. Tha purpose of the P80 aoceee le to provide foci lit ice end reecsrsee to develop end provide Cable asrvicaa that will be in the public interest. Tha development of the PB6 access portion of our agraaoant is directly tied to the ongoing nagotintiom with Comceat Cablevialon becauaa Comcaat Cableviaion services approximately 3400 homer to the went of the City. Those 3200 hoawa moat be efEordaA tae eveilability of Cable Ty connection prior to the implementation of the PEO acceu. ~Sl aassrAU.xsa xn caexa zo/POwm access couren soeoarxaxss February 7, 1990 Page 2 Nith this in mind, it is lmportmt that the City maintsin s continuity with Lha Camcaet Cableviaiow negotiatioae and the implaawntation of the PeC access. However, einq tM diawlutiow of the Citlsens 7ldviaory Commiaelow, the subcommittee working with the CeOle Uwee neada to W formally reeatabliehed. The Ceungi t au_hrte`nwi tta. fn. w~.. uviS-_~ _-.-,;.... ,,.,~~ ~~ -. .y. .. __ _.,- william J. alaxmder. eepectfull and/nnsitiad, ian~~~ administrative Melyat DO/eaf 89-747 R rc .ao u ~~.. r nimv nc orwinun n~rnrvnwrn• i STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City`C~uncil FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Mal -. ~ SUBJECT: LAII EMPORCSNSMT BTODY 8TH8RIM0 COMNITTBB The law enforcement study is currently underway, and soon, reviews of progress reports will be needed. The original proposal by Hughes, Heise and Associates referenced working with a steering committee. Should the Council wish to have a steering comittee, it should at this time appoint one. The consultant anticipates program report reviews the weeks of March 5, April 2 and April 23, 1990 and is requesting that the City reach closure on this subject. JL/pr 90-50 ao5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1~ DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: MikT Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ANNEXATION 89-02 - ETINANDA NORTH - Mnexation of approx ma e y acres o erril:ory generally located north of 24th Street and east of the extension of Milliken Avenue - Status update and request for Council Subcommittee. I. ABSTRACT: Staff is working on several issues which appear to be mpe moots to annexation. These issues include proposed use of County Flood Control land, potential Landowner opposition to annexation, and annexation timing. Staff requests direction from the City Council on these issues. II. RECpMEN0ATI0N: Formation of a subcommittee of the ri tv rmmcil to rev ew annexa ion issues and recoamend action at the March 7, 1990 meeting of the City Council. III. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: In order to provide for the orderly eve opmen o an n e City's Sphere of Influence, the City has been pursuing the annexation of 5,600 acres, commonly referred to as the Ettwanda North Area. There are several related actions, including annexation of approximately 1,155 additional acres of land to be added to the City's Sphere of Influence. (See Yicinity Map). Also, staff is reviewing a proposal fora Specific Plan which will pre-zone the territory, an action which is required by the Local Agency Formation Commission prior to the completion of annexation. The Planning Coaan{ssion has held several workshops on the Specific Plan and the applicant has held Mo community meetings. In addition, an Environmental Impact Report for the Ettwanda North Specific Plan is being prepared and the draft is expected to circulate in mid-February, 1990. All actions necessary for the City Council to proceed with the adoption of a Resolution of Intent to Mnex have occurred, however, some impediments to annexation still exist. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION 89-02 - ETINANDA NORTH February 7, 1990 Page 2 County Policy on Mnexation: On November 29, 1989, the City Council-a~opt~ eso u an requesting the support of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors for annexation of the Etiwanda North area. The Board received and filed our Resolution and no definitive County policy has resulted. We are aware that Supervisor Mikels is currently reviewing this matter and is specifically looking at iJre Flood Control lands. ii ii¢ i.wniy wwia iol i~ sBypJ:t CT t;; $~=^A_rA< fn. Anvnln~mnnf major disincentive to annexation would be removed. However, prior to obtaining County support, there appear to be issues which must be resolved, such as the future use of potential surplus County Flood Control lands. County Flood Control Land: As flood control facilities are ins a e , e u ure s atus of Flood Control lands must be resolved. A portion of the Flood Control lands must be retained for flood control purposes, a portion must be preserved for environmental mitigation, and a surplus portion will be available for schools, parks and residential development. Also, additfonal private land holdings must be acquired to satisfy mitigation for flood control projects, as well as to satisfy mitigation for development. The environmental review process will help clarify mitigation requirements for flood control and other requirements for devewpment ana ieaa Into a negotiation process w7th Lhe County on the use of Fiood Control lands. Based on the history of cooperation between the City and County Flood Control on land acquisition for the Alta Loma Fire Station, a mutually beneficial outcome is anticipated. Mr. Joe DitorTo has forwarded a proposal to the County for use of County Flood Control lands. County staff and Supervisor Jon Mikels are reviewing Mr. DiIorio's proposal. City staff will also be meeting with County staff to discuss the potential uses of Flood Control land. Final determination of the land use for Flood Control property is expected to occur at a later date as part of or an Nnendment to the proposed Specific Plan. Potential Landowner Opposition to Mnexation: Mother impediment ~.. a~~n~,ca~ ate, a en re tLrwan a r area is that two large property owners, Landmark Land Company and Etiwanda Heights Development Corporation (Chengl, appear to oppose annexation at this time. Consequently, an adjustment of annexation boundaries may be needed to successfully annex territory to the City. There are several possible adjustment scenarios which are being reviewed. ~7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION 89-02 - ETINANDA NORTH February 7, 1990 Page 3 Mnexation Timin The third issue is timing. The City's fiscal mpac ich has been proposed in conjunction with the Environmental Impact Report for the Specific plan and will provide the oasis for the `Nian or xrvices~• required by the Local agency Formation Commission, is virtually complete. It is estimated that the required maps and site plan of services could be completed as soon as the annexation boundaries are agreed upon and be realty for City Council action on a Resolution of Intent to Mnex at the March 7, 1990 City Council meeting. IV. CONCLUSION: Direction is needed on annexation issues, including t e proposed use of County Flood Control land, potential landowner opposition to annexation, and annexation timing. In order to facilitate review of the issues, it is recomended that a subcommittee of the City Council meet for the purpose of recommending action at the March 7, 1990 meeting of the City Council. Res ally matted, Bra le ~ity Tanner a 86:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" ~ YicinTty Map ANNEXATION HA/ '~ 1133 ACNE ANEA PNDVOSED TO BE ANNE%ED NITO THE CITyS SPIIENE OF NIFLIIENCE © ANNEXATOI 1f-0Z Siff ACNE ANEA PNOP08ED TO BE ANNE%ED MTO THE CITY E%IfTMNi CITY SMIENE OF NIFLUENCE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: ANNEXATION 89-02 PLANNING DMSION ~,E; VICINITY MAP N' W ( EXHIBIT: ~A~ SGLE: NONE "~~~~,-,• svECIrN: v~AN 1f-ol EnwANDA NDNTN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 7, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Cgleman; Drinri nal pt annex SUBJECT: STATUS ON RECYCLING BILL 0.82020 I. ABSTRACT: This report is in response to City Council request for information regarding compliance with 0.82020. I[. BACKGROUND: The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (0.82020) establishes a network of recycling centers for consumers to redeem their aluminum, glass, plastic, and non-aluminum metal bottles and cans. Convenience tones were established within a half-mile radius around every supenmarket which has f2 million or more in annual gross sales. Each convenience zone must have an operating recycling center or each retailer of beverages is subject to f100 dally fines. Ten such convenience zones have been identified in the City of Rancho Cucan,unya. ine wi.i aiau yivea cries ii,e autnuriiy, wishin the convenience zones, to site recycling facilities. The City Council adopted regulations governing recycling facilities in November 1987. (See attached Exhibit C.) III. STATUS: There have been 51x (6) applications for recycling faciiity penaits (see Exhibit "A"). Of these, the Planning Division approved far (4) of these permits, one was never completed by tha applicant, and one was denied. On January 30, 1990 staff conducted a field survey of all ten convenience zones within the City and detenained that alt supermarkets, except Hughes, have same form of recycling program 1n place. As a new store, Hughes has 90 days from February 1 to establish their recycling center. See Ezhlblt "A" for a summary of the current recycling activities at each center. The State has certified six (6) recycling centers within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (see Exhibit "B"), three of which are recyclers outside convenience zones. Lucky's, Albertsons, Yons, and Stater Bros. (9750 19th) are all 1n compliance with the City's regulations. Alpha Beta (9640 Base Line) and Stater Bros. (8770 Base Line) are operating in violation without recycling faciiity permits from the City. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RECYCLING BILL AB2020 February 7, 1990 Page 2 Goodwill Industries of the Inland Counties, Imo. have been working with the Ctty staff for a eaabinatin" c,~,..wdn r..~...~u._ r_-~_- aamuei Cox, President of the Goodwill oftYce has" secured authorization for the Goodwill/recycling center from the shopping center owner and the Stater Bros. Market 19750 19th) and also prepared the basis submittal requirement for City approval. However, since staff's last meeting with Mr. Cex this gae~ ..-e.., we still have not received a complete application. Staff has attempted to reach Mr. Cox 1n order to determine his interest in pursuing the Goodwill/recycling center. As of this report we still have not heard from him. Ne will continue to pursue this matter. 'i;... >x Re; ally t s ~ra le City anner BB:DC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Recycling Survey EM••Cit "u" Cc t'ficC " Exhibit "C" "VCl~r~y C~r~k;~ - Rerycling facility Regulations Exhibit "D" - Sumaary of A82D20 G7'' ~ t L i S ~~~ R= ~_ ~:_ $~ ~ ~ ~ ;gg b a oY 3~ ¢ LL O LL N N A N N r f Y 0 ~ ~ ~ tl O !~ n ~ n N ~ a •G a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ;j jaj {~ ~ ~~11 • ~(rpp~ p ~ O ~ ~ V1 P 0 0 0 0 M x ~~ i+ g SEE i ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~g~~ O +p app app 1p~ N p 0 0 1~ p Y O V O O S) O O FAI ~~~ ~~ ~' ¢ fi ~ Y ~ r N ~ry i ~a- ~f~~) STATE CERTIP'l<ED RECYCi~NG CEPTERB All State Paper & Metal i3i95 wniciram Reynolds Aluminum 9911 6th Street Lucky's (EnWpco) 6351 Haven Alpha Beta/Albertsons (Ernipco) 9640/9743 Base Line DCE Inc. 9529 8th Street Von's (EnWpco) 8775 19th Street Source:Intervlew with Robin Rutherford, State Departrnent of Conservation, Dtviston of Recycling on January 10, 1990. WORKS/WP: RECYCLING2 3 ~~ ~~'.... , ~~~ '~, v .oa.oso be granted, provided that the building permit for the first permitted dwelling or structure on the same site has also een extended, b. Installation of trailer coaches may occur n _y after a valid building permit has been iesne,i by the ci building and safety division, c. Trailer coaches permitted pursuant to this secti n shall not exceed a maximum gross square Footage of six hu red fifty square feet in size (tongue not included) d The trailer coach must have a valid Califor~ nia vehi a license and shall provide evidence of State Di- vision o£ ousing approval as prescribed in the Health and Safety Cod o£ the state. A recreational vehicle being de- fined as a torhome, travel trailer, truck camper or camp- ing trailer, ith or without motive power, shall not be per- mitted pursue to this section, e. The temporary trailer coach installation . must meet all r uirements and regulations o£ the county department of en ronmental health services and the city building and safet division, £. Any ermit issued pursuant to this section in conjunction with construction project shall become in- valid upon cancellati or completion of the building permit for which this use has can approved, or the expiration o£ the time for which the a royal has been granted; 10. Other uses an activities similar to the above as deemed appropriate by th city planner. At that time, trailers shall be removed fr the site; 11. Temporary Office idea. The use of temnorarv structures, sucn as trailers or rafabricated structures for use as interim offices, may be c sidered in any district subject to the approval of a condi 'onal use permit and the regulations stated within subseetio F4 of Section 17.10- .030. D. Application. Applications fo a temporary use per- mit shall be filed with the planning div ion in a manner prescribed by the city planner. E. New Applications Following Denial. Following the denial of a temporary use permit application no application for a temporary uee permit for the same or su tantially the same uee or the same or substantially the same 'te shall be filed within one year from the date o£ denial. d. 385 SS1, 2, 1988; ord. 293 52, 1986; ord. 211 S6 (part), 19831. 11.04.080 Hec clin lacilit ermit. A. Furpoae and Intent. It is purpose o a sect on to provide ragula- tiona and standards which pertain to the review, construc- tion and operation of recycling £aciltiea within the city. The placement, construction or operation of any recycling facility, as defined herein, is prohibited without first obtaining a permit purausnt to the provisions set forth in this section. ~~'~~ 2~-34a (Rancho Cucamonga a~ 7/L7) 17.04.680 B. Definitions. ~- I. 'Convenience zone" means that area within a one- i half mile radius of a supermarket as designated by the Cali- fornia Department of Conservation pursuant to the terms of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Re- duction Act (Cali £ornia Public Resources Code Sections 14500, _ _~ , 2. "Recyclable material" means reusable material inlcuding, but not limited to, metal, glass, plastic and paper. 3. "Recycling Facility" means a structure for the collection of recyclable materials, certified ae a racyc ling f_ci lity by the California D."oartmant of Conservation as meeting the requirements of the California Beverage Contain- er Recycling and Litter Reduction Act. Recycling facilities include the following: a. Reverse Vending Machine. A "reverse vending machine" means one or more automated mechanical devices, which occupy a space no larger than three hundred forty-two square feet, and which are used for the collection of one or more recyclable materials in return Eor a cash refund or redeemable credit clip with a value not less than the redem- ption value as determined by the California Department of Conservation. b. Mobile Recycling Unit. A mobile recycling unit shall be a kiosk, bin or portable container, occupying a space less than three hundred forty-two square feet, which is used for the collection and redemption of recyclable mat- erials and which is operated by an attendant during hours of operation. A mobile recycling unit may include certain oer- manent structures associated with the mobile recycling unit as provided in this section. C. Development Standards. The placement, construction and operation of recycling facilities shall be subject to the following development standards: 1. Recycling facilities shall be established in conjunction with an existing commerical use which is in com- pliance with the development, building and fire codes of the city and is located within a convenience zone in an area zoned for coawercial or industrial uses. 2. A reverse vending machine which occupies an area less than Fifty square feet may be placed under the building canopy adjacent to the business which sells beverages in redeemable containers. Reverse vending machines which occu- oy more than Fifty square feet, but less than three hundred forty-two square feet, shall be placed within the parking area or other approved location of the associated commeri- cial use. 3. Recycling tacilitiea not located under the buil- ding canopy shall be set back at least fifty feat from any street frontage, as measured from the curb face. (Rancho Cucamonga 272-34b 7/89) I~ 17.04.080 4. Recycling facilities shall be conveniently ac- cessible to pedestrians and vehicles and shall be designed to include safety provisions for separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic (i.e., special walkways, drive aisles, bollards, safety lighting, etc.l. 5. Recycling facilities shall be designed in a man- ner consistent with the architectural and site plan of the associated COmmelC iai use, inClUding, but not 11m1teQ Lo exterior materials, color and landscaping. 5. P.:cyc li.^.q facilities u.•hich are net located under the building canopy o£ the associated commercial use shall be designed with related permanent enclosures or screening such as an overhead tre 11° o- -- 7. Recycling facilities which are operated by an on-site attendant shall be provided access to the facilities of the associated commercial use (i.e., restroom, drinking fountains, e[c.). B. Recycling facilities which are not located under the building canopy of the associated commercial use or within a landscaped area of the associated commercial use shall be designed with a landscape planter at least three feet in width (inside dimension) along the sides and rear of the recycling facility. 9. Recycling facilities shall be maintained in good repair and the area immediately surrounding the recycling facility shall be maintained in a Litter-free condition. All storage o£ recyclable materials shall be within the recycling facility or related enclosed structure. 10. Signaqe regv fired for a recycling facility shall uuwpiy wi ci, cite siyn ordinance of trio city and, where appli- cable, the approved uniform sign program for the associated commercial use. 11. Recycling facilities which are operated by an on-site attendant and located within one hundred feet of a property Zoned or occupied for residential uses shall oper- ate only during the hours of nine a.m. to seven p.m. D. Action of the City PLanner. 1. The city planner shall approve an application for a recycling facility; provided, that the applicatioq complies with each of the following requirements: a. The recycling facility is certified, or has applied to be certified, as a recycling location pursuant to the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act; b. The opaiator of the recycling facility has presented a written authorization from the property owner where the proposed recycling facilities are to be located; and c. The recycling facility complies with all of the development standards as set forth in this section. 2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city planner may deny an application fox a recycling facility, if it is 272-34c (Rancho Cucamonga ^'~ 5/88) 17.06.010 specifically found that the operation of the recycling fac i- t- lity will have a detrimental effect on the public health, 1 safety or general welfare. In the case of any such denial, the city planner shall support the action with specific written findings of facts based on substantial evidence. E. Automatic Revocation. Any permit granted pursuant to the terms of this section shell he deemed automatically revoked if the operator's recycling certificate is revoked or suspended by the California Department of Conservation pursuant to the terms of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act. (Ord. 327 §3, 1987) Chapter 17.06 LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 17.06.~Development/design review. 17.06.0 Minor development review. 17.06.030 Residential growth management review system. Purpose and 1. This sec on establishes the review procedures for residential, comme ial, industrial, and institutional development proposals to acilitate project review by local .._:~.~_ _ _ ea ao ut_.. _n~/An _ .c... o, r..m_ mittees in a timely and of ~ lent manner; to'ensure that development projects comply 'th all applicable Local design guidelines, standards, and ozd ances; [o minimize adverse effects on surrounding propertie and the environment; and are consistent with the general p n which promotes high aesthetic and functional standards complement and add to the physical, economic, and social c rather of Rancho Cuca- monga. 2. in addition, the city finds hat a development/ design review process will support the im ementation of the general plan, as it stresses quality comma 'ty design stan- dards. The city further finds that the qual y of certain residential, institutional, commercial, and i ustrial uses has a substantial uapact upon the visual appeal environ- mental soundness, economic stabiiitY, and proper valuPS of the city. This section is not intended to reatzic imagina- tion, innovation or variety, but rather to focus on mmuni- ty design principles which can result in creative ima a- live solutions for the project and a quality design for e city. It is, therefore, the purpose of this section to: (Rancho Cucamonga 272-34d 5/88) 'dl~ CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING \ AND LITTER REDUCTION ACT FACT SNEET AB 2020, California`s recently enacted Bottle 8`11, estab- lished a new recvcllnC Proprem for beverage containers to ba administered by the Department of Conservation's Division of Recycling. The first of its kind in the nation, the program is intended to increase recycling o[ beverage containers and decrease litter. Thousands of recycling centara will open statewide far consumers to redeem their aluminum, plastic, glass and non-aluminum metal beverage containers. o convenience zones are established showing a one-half mile radius around every major supermarket which has $2 million or more in annual gross sales. Recycling canters moat be operating within the 2,7{1 zones by January 1, 1988 or dealers within those zones will ba Lined $100 daily. o Beginning Septombar 1, 1987 bavarago distributors must pay to the State one cant for oath beverage container sold in California. Rodoemabla containers will carry the mark ••~ali[ornia neuampi.iwn Paiur." o Beginning OCTOBER 1, 1987, consumers who return their marked beverage containers to certified recyclers will be paid one penny per container, plus any applicable scrap value and bonus. o The program has a goal of Bo percent recycling. Hoaaver, if a 6S percent rata is not reached for any specific container-typo by January i, 1990, the redemption value goes to 2 cents, and to 7 cants on January 1, 199]. o The unrsdaamad portion of the Lund will ba used to provide incentives for recycling cantors to sorva unsarvod areas, recycling bonuses for conaunara, litter and recycling grants for community conservation corps programs, public education and promotion, and administrativa costs. o Incentives era also provided Lor nonprofit organizations and curbside pickup programs opsratsd by aithsr nonprofit or municipal districts. .21$ ~~~T /,~1 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 17, 1990 TO: Hayor and MBmberB Of the City Council i- PAOM: Diane O'Neal, administrative Analye SUBJECT: UPOaTE ON UR6 Ol R6CICLEO PaP6R RRCONMII70aTIO It Se recommended thai Ln July, 1990, Purchasing order a taw eemole cease of recycled paper for evaluation es a pilot project. @JI CROROOND The purpose of this eiaff report ie to provide en update regarding the use of recycled paper. At the time the Clty developed its ^in-houee^ white paper recycling program (January, 1988, Purchasing investigated the use of recycled paper and indicated there waa a coat differential between avallnble recycled paper and virgin paper of almost 100 percent. also, the greeting card industry waa the only user of recycled paper and, thus, tae reluctance of paper mill^ to produce recycled paper. The recycled paper was also not of n quality acceptable to moat businesses. Recently, Purchasing raxained the uaa of recycled paper and advises theca is now a greater demand for rscyclad paper and the industry, ltulf, hse ban improving the technology for producing both recycled bond and printed paper (lettarhend~. Bristly, the issues o[ both quality and coat in tho uos oP rscyclad bond paper are important oonaidsretions. Presently, there is a conosrn Lhat the recycled bond paper may cease frequent "tae" when used in our copiers. However, our supplier advised that because of production improvements, the quality of rscyolad paper may become ae goad n virgin stock in anotMr six months. 2n addition, there continua to W a significant cost differential Wtween using rsayoled vereu^ virgin paper. The &tate Office of procurement advlus a set, minimum order would have to G placed Eor rscyclad paper and at present ware uns6le to place such a large order due to lack of storage apace. Update on Use of gerycled paper January 17, 1990 page Two It Se anticipated that once w• move into the Civic Center, Purchasing would order e few eemple caeca of the recycled paper and svalwte its uee baton any newrwl •m•nh 1n 1 °°,~ nM • A.K• _ __ ~ o--~~ - - ~~wne regatplMJ nOth quality end cost of recycled paper would then De provided. Additionally, the City utilises a •raq• pspet for its letterhead end suppliers do not uee the recycled popes in the graduction of the •raq• paper. She reason supgl sera do not use the rerycled paper'to produce the °raq• paper L because Lha ^zecipe^ for the production of the •raq^ paper ie trademarked paper, 6uppliere adviu that the technology for uelnq recycled paper to make s ^raq• paper Se continuing to improve and may W available within six months. Once an evaluation of the Leproved recycled paper for uu in ^raq• paper has boon completed, the Council may wish to consider using the recycled •rag• paper for its letterhead. In conclusion, the demand for recycled paper continues to increase and u awn as we haw evaluated the Improved recycled paper, an updaN will W presented to the City Council for its consideration. oo/set 90-018 ~, o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT unra ~aauary cc, srru TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Russell H. Maguire. City Engineer L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief SUB1ECf: Report on Curtent City Standard Street Width, Length and Access Relative to the Operation of Emergency Vehicles Minimum street width for both public and private residential streets should be no less than 36 feet, with no variance allowed. Cul-de-sac's in high density residential (i.e. condominium, apartment, attached multi-family) areas should not exceed 300 feet io length. All other cul-de-sae's should not exceed 600 Peat in length. Cul-de-sac's in excess of 600 fat should not be allowed and should be replaced by a through street with two points of mobatmeted 36 foot access. All subdivisions tracts should have two complete and unobstructed points of access, each a minimum of 36 feet wide. BAIXGROl7ND: Street Width During November of 1989, questions were directed to the City Engineering Department and to the Fire District regarding what appeared to be differences in the interpretation and application of their respective codes u applied to street widths. One specific point of discussion revolved around a project located on north Hermosa Avenue, known u "The Woods", where the street width was permitted at 28 feet. Historically speaking, the Fire District hsa had the responsibility of establishing tiro Isne and fire access standards in accordance with their Ordinance N10 sad the Engineering Department has administered the requirements pertaining to public streets u established in the Circulation Element of the General Plea. The fire lane and fim aaess standards are, for the most pen, applied to wiWin commercial/industrial projects where the type of conatrvetioo and/or occupancy dictate the need for a minimum 26 foot Brc Isne. This width allows for the set-up of the truck company while still leaving enough distance for another piece of emergency equipment to pau the truck, if needed. This type of procedure is not normally required when combating Brea io aingla-family type residential atrvcturaa. Therefore, the minimum 36 foot public street width is autficieot (or the Pirc District Deeds, but the minimum street width moat be maintained at 36 feet. Street Width, Length and Access January 22, 1990 Page 2 There have been some instances where a private development has been constrnctea uuuztng non-uetiiwrcu nir«ie I:. - - p:ojc::. °_:i^e ^ ~nm streets, the width of the street is constructed ~bclow the minimum width accepted for public or dedicated streets. This allowable narrowing creates tactical problems for the Fire District and parking enforcement problems for the Sheriff. •v ...... ,....vvu,u ,.bYii ~.• what ^isV normallyya private, gatedydevelopment where parking is allowed on both sides of We street. When considering these private streets, two areas of concem should be recognized. The first concern is aesthetics. These private streets can b:. posted as Ere lanes by placing signs every 100 feet throughout the project or the curbs can be painted red. Neither of Wese will produce general public or city planner appeal for aesthetic quality. Secondly, enforcement of the no parking would become difficult in a gated community, due to the lack of continued and reliable access through the gates. Even without the gates, the enforcement problem would be continuous avd burdensome and could product adverse reactions to the Council level on behalf of the affwted residents. Thtreforc, these private seats should be treated the same as the public street and a minimum width of 36 feet should bt required. This will provide for reliable emergency access and at the same time reduce the need for parking enforcement. Cul-de-sec's Tl.n Inoue dnaA.•nd r,d-A.-vet roon armor bar boon innnd In hn n of rho moat difficult to plan around initially and also to navigate later on when completed. These issues become extremely problematic when the cut-de-sac is proposed for a high density dwelling project. Some of the problems that occur are that the residents and/or visitors will not only park on both aides of the street (normally 600 feet long), but also park perpendicular to the cut-de-sac bulb, creating a turn-around problem for emergency equipment. When that occurs, it becomes necessary for the apparatus operators to back the equipment approximately 600 feet out [o the nearest intersection. Even with the use of "backers" (another firefighter watching the back of the unit as it moves backward) it is not an all together safe practice. This rcquircd backing out also delays the rcaponu of this unit, should it be needed at another emergency scene. Another item to consider is that during an emergency al these high density projects, the emergency equipment will be attempting to use the same access in as the residents are using to evacuate. This will become more profoundly noticeable when a natural disaster strikes end panially or completely isolates those residents living in high density projects on 600 foot Tong streets, Based upon the foregoing information, it is to the advantage of the emergency responders and to the residents that cut-de-sac's in multi-family zoning be limited in IengN to 300 feet. Thia will reduce the number of vehicles on the street, reduce the backing distance end reduce the potential threat of those did' Street Width, Length and Access Ianuary 22, 1990 Page 3 being isolated to ane-hali in comparison to the number of !hose Currently existing on 600 font aul-de-su's. L'el-de-sac :a in r•.xc~sa or at r a Within the past year or so, a project was proposed which, when completed, would have tied Iwo atreep togetheq giving access to the project from two ooinls. A smell uerisin¢ of citir<n comnlaiat aurfutd and the end result was one short col-dcsu and another col-de-sac approximately 1200 feet io length. It was then necessary to require an emergency ucondary access to this project in an attempt to mitigate the excessive Icogth of the col-dc-sac, That secondary ucess now presents a ut of problems on its own. The big problem is, will the access be there wheo we seed i[7 la the meantime, who is going to monitor and enforce i[s existence on a consistent basisT to the future, we should avoid creating on-going problems for ourselves by not allowing col-de-sac's in excess of 600 feet. It would appear the moat expedient, cost eitective, and Saltat method of resolving this type of dilemma is to require through streets in plue of extended col-de-sus. The citizen's conceros regarding traffic sad noise is understood, but at the same time it is not too unrcalislic to believe that the original citiun concern can turn into litigation when it is found that a delry in response occumd due to blocked access, both primary (cars, parking, natural disaster, etc.) and secondary (growth, planting, cooatrudon, etc.). Again, it is to our advantage and ultimately to that of the citiun, that cul•de•aaca in excess of 600 feat not be Two Pointe of A c as for Tre ~ This area is one which should be most easily remedied. Two points of access for tracts is required on a fairly standard basis at this time. Again, it is a safety based requirement which enhances the ingress of emergency vehicles while at the same time allowing for the egress of residents via a operate route. On occasion, emergency vehicles will be responding from diametrically opposing directions and two points of uccsa allows for a more rapid and direct response for both vehicles. This area could stand some erophasis but for the moat pan ie being handled on a fairly equitable and consistent basis throughout the city. Respectfully submitted enul M. Ma i Fire Chief Ct r LBA/sa ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 ~ ~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: STREET NAMING - A report on the status of the City's current ~ s re~eE n~ policy. I. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Division Nark Program be a us e o a e imaediate action on updating the Street Naming Ordinance and the implementation of phase one of the street name checking computer program. Further, that a work program for addressing correct street name problems be prepared along with the Fire Department and that staff continue to pursue our computer capabilities. II. ABSTRACT: The City Council (Fire Board) requested a report on the 1'TEyTrrent process and regulations on street naming. III. BACKGROUND: Mhen the Lity incorporated in 1977, it inherited ss r~~ing problems from the County. For example, there Ts a 24th Street in Cucamonga (below Arrow Route) and in Etiwanda Cucamonga, such as 24th, 25th, and 26th that are "out-of-sequence" with other ma,)or numbered streets elsewhere in the City, such as 19th Street in Alta Loma. These street naming problems are not only confusing to rest dents and visitors, but present an even greater difficulty for public safety agencies who must respond quickly in an emergency. To address any future similar problems, the City Council adopted Street Naming Ordinance No. 144 on May 20, 1982. The Ordinance established procedures for naming new streets and changing existing street names. Ordinance No. 144 requires that developers must submit proposed street names to the City Planner for approval. The names are reviewed for consistency with Lhe naming conventions set forth in the Ordinance (i.e. - north-south streets to be named "AUanUkS"). The recordation of the fi not tract, map actually creates new street names. The process for changing a street name may be initiated by public request, Resolution of Planning Commission or Resolution of the City Council. Public hearings must be held by the Planning Commission and the City Council under the existing Ordinance procedure. This process 1s time consuming and costly. For example, the Hermosa/Turner name change took approximately five months to complete. Street name changes can also be a very CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET NAMING February 7, 1990 Page 2 sensitive and emotional issues to the public. In addition, residents and businesses affected by the proposed change mdy Incur inconvenience and costs associated with changing si gnage; notification of customers, vendors, and creditors; and reprinting business materials and advertisements with the new street address. The City would also incur direct costs in the manufacturing and Installation of new street name signs at a tort of annroximately ti5_!NI garb fnr ¢in~lo hlaAa et nnc and tFn nQ gall! for overhead-type signs. IV. NAMING PROBLEMS: Most street name problems fall into these general ca egor es: dupitcate names ("24th Street"), 2) difficult to pronounce names ("Yta Salsipuedes"), 3) continuous/discontinuous streets ("Highland"), 41 out-of-sequence numerical streets ("24th" and "19th") and 5) sound alikes ("Malven" and "Malvern"). As the City has grown, so has the number of street names. The list of street names changes dally as new maps are recorded. (There are currently about I,B00 street names in the City.) Public safety is a primary concern in naming streets. In emergency situations, street names and addresses can directly affect Fire or Police response time. Street addresses are equally as important to Pu61ic Safety Agencies. Dispatches are made based upon street address block numbers. Like all cities, street addresses are assigned by the Building 8 Safety Division as part of the building permit process. In response to a request from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for the re-examination of the Street Naming Ordinance and specific requests for street name changes, this matter was added to the Planning Division 86-87 Mork program, but given a low priority. Nork on the amendmm~t to the Street Naming Ordinance and street name changes, except for the Hermosa/Turner Street unification, has not occurred to date. PROPOSED PROGRAM: To address the concerns ldentifted earlier by e re s r ct and City staff, staff would propose that the following measures be undertaken: Step 1: Update the Street Naming Ordinance. Step 2: Ilevelop and i~lement a computer program to assist with street naming and street addressing. Step 3: Include the Fire District in the process of naming streets (part of update to Ordinance 144). Step 4: Involve the Oublte Safety Cow,aission in the street name change process (part of update t0 Ordinance 144 ). Step 5: Prioritize and ini1ti1ate street name changes. 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET NAMING February 7, 1990 Page 3 In December, staff met with members of the Fire District to discuss mutual concerns with the current street naming process and possible direCt10n5 tp resolving those Concerns. Staff has ettaChetl. 85 a part of this report, a Fire District memorandum summarizing that meeting. Further, staff has met with our own in-house computer experts to identify the ability of our current computer system to address the concerns noted and, if necessary, what it would take to cpmput_ert pn thn street nMn}np nraeess to mi nimire the potential fnr human error. Attached Ts a summary of staff's findings on the capabilities of our current computer system and the recommended adJustments necessary to address our current concerns. In conclusion, the naming of streets is important and can create conflict with puD11c safety response time if not properly implemented. Therefore, Staff would recommend, witA City Council concurrence, that the Planning Division take immediate action on updating the Street Naming Ordinance and implement phase one of the street name checking computer program as outlined in Jerry Fulwood's January 10, 1990 memo. Further, staff would recommend that a schedule for addressing current street name problems be prepared along with the Fire Department and that staff continue to work wtth the Resource Services Department on computer programmlmJ that will further idiy'iJ oui Sti pct i~ewii.y yiin.cii. uw~iwu iul ,ei e, mN.e is Advanced Planning's current work program, AdJustments will be made to reflect the changes noted above. Res u11y ltte , ~----- Br ~ e City anner BB:sp Attachments: Ordinance 144 - Street Naming Ordinance Memo from Fire District Nemo from Jerry FulwooC on Proposed Street Name Checking System Planning Division Mork Program ~~ < < SECTION VI ORDINANCE NO. 144 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR STREET NAMING W1ff.REA3, it is necessary to establish procedures for street naming for new public and private streets in the City o[ Rancho Cucamonga in the interest of uniformity and to avoid confusion to the public; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to establish s procedure Por changing existing street names in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; end WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has adopted Resolution No. 81-29 establishing 9trest Naming Policy for Rancho Cucamonga on March 11, 1981. The City Council does ordain ns follows: SECTION 1: STREET NAMES A. That attest names should be oleesant sounding, appropriate, easy to reed (so that the public, and children in particular, can handle the name in an emergency situation), and should add to the pride of home ownership and community. B. That the following types of street names are unscceptable: numerical names (lat, 2nd, eta); aiphebetfeel letters (A, 8, C, etc.); frivolous, complicated or undesirable names; unoonventional spelling; compound names; given or surnames of persona living or dead (Pioneer families, historic persona, etc., excluded). C. That streets which are continuous shell be extended in accordance with the present street names wherever possible end feasible. _,. ~~ -18 ;. -,:. ,,, ~ < D. That discontinuous streets shall not be given the same name. E. That dupliestion of existing or proposed street names is prohibited. Similar ..w :.. _ _ duplication, regardless o[ spelling., F. That in existing nreas of the City, strive to have new street names be consistent with the pre valling theme of north/south atreeta named after gems and east/west streets named alter trees when possible and where feasible. G. That streets with a 90 degree or more change of dlreotion shall change names et a convenient and appropriate poinlVt as determined by the C[ty Planner. /~ H. That of rest designation for present and future atreeta shat] be as follows: 1. Boulevard Speeiel Esst-West Streets to be nomad Boulevards. 2. 9treata East-west atreeta to be named Streets. 3. Avenues North-south streets to be nsmed Avenues. 4. Goad My diagonal street which does not conform basically to grid to be known es Roads. 5. I)t ive East-west streets parallel to, but between named Streets, to be called Drives. 8. Place North-south atreeta, parallel te, but between named Avenues, to De called Places. 7. Wa,+ My irregulsr street which cannot conform to •ny grid to ba known se Way. j ~Q -19 n. a :~. ~ C g. Court A cul-de-sac or dead-end street with turnaround which cannot be reasonably extended to carry the name nP thr nrpradi n.. 'LrC-~ -a .. Or A cul-de-sac which serves not more than seven (7) lots shall carry the same name ea the street serving it. 9• Woo A street which originates and terminates on same common base street shell be ~dealgnated as a Loo (East-weal or North-south street end named to Indicate the name common base street. l0. PPro~n taSe Frontage roads shall carry n+w o the same name es the street or avenue served and shell not De :Gouiliied ocnerw~se. SECTION 2: PROCSI)I1RE A. It is the responsibility o[ the applicant for development resulting in the oonatruction of new streets to submit names to the City for approval. B. The City Planner or hie designee shall approve all street names In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3r CHANGING OP STREET NAMES A. The ehanging of street names may be inttieted by any of the following: i. Public request which must be in writing to the City Council stating the justlficetion for such a change. ~q -,o- ~ < 9. Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commssion. 3. Resolution o[ Intention of the City Council. tP nh~neo 1 ^;t:ao.'. tuLJugi, public request, the City may require the applicant to pay ell costs incurred by the change (including, but not limited to street signs, public hearing_ notification. ate.). In all cases, it shall be the duty of the Planning Division, to prepare a report discussing the justification for each a change, recommending a replacement name end discussing the impact of the proposed change. SECTION 4: STREET NAbtE CNANfiE PROCESS The Secretary of the Planning Camm(salon ahnll place the matter on the first available Planning Commission Agenda, and ehali submit the report to the Planning Division at thst tinre. R Tha Dla .. i.. I`~.......i __i__ _ _ _.... ..e _..... ~.. .... ....... .. publ[c hearing on the proposed street name change. Snid public hearing shall be noticed to all property owners on the street proposed for change by mail ten (13) days prior to the hearing, or by the posting of a notice along the street at 900 toot Inter vela, ten X10) days prior to the hearing. The Pos~'`Office, County Recorder, Pire District and Sheriff's Department shall also be sent written notice of the proposed change. C. The Planning Commission may recommend approval, conditional approval, or denial to the Couneli by Ae selutiort ursuant Lo the findings in Section !~ of this Resolutton. iy d ~+ '~1- y..: C i D. Upon receipt of the Commission's Resolution, the City Clerk shall enter the matter on the next evailab le Council Agenda. The Council shall hold a public hearing. Se id hearing shell De noticed in the manner outlined above. E. Upon receiving testimony at the public hearing, the Council shall announce its decision on the proposed street name change by Resolution. The Council may approve, condltionelly approve, or deny the street nsme change pursuant to the findings in Section 5 of this Ordinance. If approved, the Ordinance shell include the date upon which said change will become effective. This decision shall be final. Sixty (80) days prior to the effective date of efiange, the Clty Clerk shall send written notice o[ the change to the Post Office, County Recorder, Fire District and 9heritt's Department. SECTION 5: FINDINGS Street names may be changed pursuant to the following: ~.. ..r.,-.... Guoupc iv uJue~u~au~ with the goals, policies end standards of the General Plan. B. That the proposed change is consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Streets end Hlghwaya or adopted Circulation Element. C. That the proposed change will not cause signitlcant adverse impacts upon the environment. D. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience sad geuera3 welfare. X31 -R2- C t SECTION 8: SEYERABILITY The invalidity of any word, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part of provisions of the Ordinance shall not effect the validity of any other pert of the Ordinance ..ti~..!~ ~_- La b:,es ettect without such invalid part or•perts. SECTION 7: PUBLICATION The !@a y^r a.`..:: sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shell cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) dsya after its passage st least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulat on puD fished in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVID, and ADOPTED th to 20th dny of May, 1982. AYES: Prost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser NOESs None ABSENT: None Pht11 15- c~hl o'aser, ayor ATTEST: auren M. Wasserman, C ty ler ~3.~ -"- ~: ,~;F ; - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MEMORANDUM T0: Chief Michael FROM: Ron Mayfield ~.~' SUBJECT: !laps nnmc, ^_eC9^:ber o~ logn ~ On December 5, 1989, Chief Corcoran and I met with Brad Buller and Dan Coleman to disc'~ss street mapping ae it pertains to public safety. The meeting was very productive as we discussed areas of concerns, possible solutions and concluded with a definite plan of action. The areas of concern identified by both parties are as follows: 1. Street naming to include; duplicate names, names that are difficult to pronounce and same street names in different areas. 2. Street breaks to include; looped streets, stzeets that w~ •, ie ...a cn.. _~______ ,_ _ .. _..n _ 3.._ _ .. ~~........... `..a_._ ci, uuyii~.n Le intersections and naming/addressing y~•ofJn ~streeta with a 90B bend. 3. Street signs to include; the lack of street signs at designated breaks or intersections, and 100 block designators. 4. outdated ordinance and perhaps a lack of adherence or understanding. The need to couple aesthetics with public safety concerns. 5. Too many personnel and departments responsible for the final product. Various divisions involved in identification, naming, and addressing streets. 6. Backlog of past problems complicating emergency services delivery, such as Red Hill Country Club Dr. addreeainq and street duplication. 7. The enormous amount of time, data and organization involved in mapping. 33 Maps December 8, 1989 Page Two After much discussion, the following possible solutions were identified: 1. Rewrite the City Street Naming Ordinance to include public safety concerns. 2. Reconstruct the process to allow for a quality product, such as; a. Singular control and responsibility for the final product. This would provide control and adherence to the ordinance. b. Computerization of the street names (index), addresses and street breaks for more control of the data. Computerization would eliminate duplication of street names, addressing and breaks. It would allow for cross-referencing and data analysis. c. Fire Department involvement. 3. Identification of past and present problems, coupled with a process and time frame for correcting each of the identified problems. 4. Council/Board acknowledgement and acceptance of the level of risk inherent in the backloo of nrnhloma. w;rh direction and prioritization of corrections. Mr. Buller suggested we present this issue to the Council as a joint interest, rather than repeating it to the Board and the Council (which are synonymous). Chief Corcoran and I concur with a two-fold presentation or staff report to the Council; the first, identifying the contents of this memo; secondly, to identify the solutions for the process and final product. The next step in which the Fire District will be involved, is to identify all the past and present problems (from a public ea£ety standpoint) involved with mapping. We anticipate to have the list complete within the next 60 to 90 days, Upon completion of the 2iat, we will present it to Mr. Buller and proceed with developing the final solutions of a quality mapping and street naming program. RM/rb ~3~ ,: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM >' DATE: January 10, 1990 s „ ni FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Bob Trammell, Data Processing Supervisor SUBJECT: PROPOSED STREET NAME CHECSING SYSTEM It has been proposed that we create a computer system which would check proposed street names and ensure that the following criteria are met: 1. No duplicate street names. 2. No street names which sound like existing or previously approved street names. 3. No street names which are difficult W pronounce. Management Information Systems proposes a two phase approach to meet these needs. By breaking the system into two phases, we can meet the first two requirements now, leaving the third until it can be addressed in a timely, cost effective manner. It should he noted, however, that the programs Lo and sound mike names cannot be written to a 100'9a accuracy level, Because of this, they moat be viewed as an aid to the decision making process, not as a definitive source. The Planning Department must assess the usefulness of the system and determine how or if it would be used. PHASE ONE The first set of programs would check a proposed street name to ensure that there is no existing or previously approved street name that is identical or that sounds the same. The program, which would use a built in function of the ORACLE Data Baas Management System called SOUNDEX, would allow the user to enter the exact spelling of the street. The program would then check for street names in the data base which aro spelled tho same, or which would sound similar. For example, if a street name of "Phoothill" was proposed, the program would display "Foothill" as a possible duplicate name. The user would have to determine if "Phoothill" and "Foothill" would actually sound the same, as the program would also flag as duplicates, names that sound quite different when we pronounce them. For example, "John" and "Juan". Memo To Brad Buller PROPOSED STREET NAME CHECKING SYSTEM January 10, 1990 Page 2 Thi° •••^~T9••t mnltl M made available approrimately two weeks after your approval, and would require appro~dmately 40 hours of progranirnnr i,iiue w complete. However, because of the lack of firm rules in our language, and of the use of foreign names, there is a probability that duplicate names would occasionally slip through the check. We recommend that research be performed to identify the phonetic clusters to be converted, such as "ph" to "f , as Management Information Systems would not want to take the responsibility for missing a conversion. It is also recommended that the Planning Department approve the list. Aa more conversions are tested, the number of checks eleo increases. For ezemple, using just a few conversions we ran a quick test on Filkins Avenue, a current street in the city, and Found 2250 possible phonetic spellings! PFiABE TWO Phase two would check for the difficulty of pronunciation. Currently, no known method e~riste for determining how difficult a word is. Common words to us, such ae Cucamonga, may appear difFicult to a computer program, and the program .. ikui. Nno° oiw:t uuu~oo ":.ti "' y^.~~. w. ~°^.°_ ,v...f°rfn.i anv°ral TTnivaraitiea and they have told us that they know of no computer algorithm to determine the difficulty of a word. We estimate that implementation of phase two would prove very time consuming, costly, end subject to dispute. Management Information Systems will continue to review literature and inquire as to how others are treating this opportunity. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give either myself or Bob Trammell a call. JBF:BT:de ~ 3C~ 8'Y ~a a~i° w & ~ m r o ~ '. P l 3 N V ~. O °~\ ~\o~ ME $ C Sa q ~ 6 \ m u lm V OI V N e Vag ~ tl j y G ° O 1 U C ~ M1 O\ n~ Y ~0 3 u y ~~ ~ y q \N O y P OS Z~ ~ 0 L EY ^J Y ' ~ N `` '83 m~~ SSE ~ ~~ Q m ~ « y^ ~^ ~ py MM ~ °O l Y~ itg Y ~ L .~a ~ ~ ~ fee a ~~ r J 4 e.Y. 7 8d 4 F E:d~ S ~ » \ Y ~ Y M Y YYY Y M Y M Y M V £ £ ~ N t t E E }['~ ~ E y Y yyYyyyal '8'L'L'!'tl'!'tl ~ k°o~m ~ $a be 94lf • A ° 9~9 C ! C a i aaaaaaa~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ° 3 ~ N°ar ~ 3~°tt r ° e fee re "e ' tl~1~i ~~ a € Es _ g~_~ ~3~~ $ ~ ~ g B ~~~ ~ S S ~ ~~~ ~~~~5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~~i~~~~~ t; ~ ~ € fi$~ a e C i ~ 1V7 ~_ c'/+~~ ~j g'sy ~i !C~~c YMYx6~ C OY ~ ' N v~`pM Y}E~~Mig yaY N ES~a~F B~~~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~„` ~C~J~V bb • 4 es !~ O. e Cy `MS: W Si ~Lf 7 ~ ~ + 'J OY~N~~~NY gg i ~ ~ leN~~~ YG~k~ii ~~II3 '~Sba C ~ C yd~uilTe~~W `p^a kyj' N J°a VOY ~°Y YO JOY ~ ~ 1 ~='°G Y9 V~PQ~ N 1'1 ~ N 1p 1~ X37 O b Ol V P 1/i • W N ti O n m R R .^1 k ° none R ~i o. ~+o'r n~ ~ cvo a~~Ra. 3 8 ~ i ~ ~ i i f s ~~~" ~ i i~~~a T a s~~~rR~s ~ ~ ~+ SS ~ R g3i~',8 ~ 8 YS2~~ e~ g a 3~a~~°:~ R E ~ d~TR» ~ Idt ~~~ 33 € 3 ~^a§2wa^y~ ^ ~ ^ N R 11 ~^'~a 4 A •n•~ ~a^(1 Q a Q~N OCwi~ ~ ~ ~~~' ~ N Ny Ci n ~ ~~f aN~l~ g ~ ~ n ~9~Q GG_ ~3N~ r m m p p qq q 7 V ~ N N V V V O` tl NM O N ~NOONNNN ge~~~~ o~~ ~aaasg?~°g~g~ ~ 4 ~ i o~ ,o~ o e v v vvv a y e o o ~~~~ a~ .a~a's'~a .$$ ~ iaa a tt :tt: ^ N ~~=~ 6 n 4 8 3~ W a ~~?~~i~~ xo i ~~ S 8 4 ~ ~° 4 3 a k g v ~ °3 S ~F '~" n ~ ~ ~ 9 Q~~ ~ Ni N N V o ~ s' ~p ~ a v 3 ° n ~ ~ ~ g i v $ n 9 ~ ~ ~ E ~ R E o al 4 ~ n ~ SX '" ~ ~ ~ i g a3~ ..rrya~,. ~ti P 0 P 0 va ~Q ~' m ti q bL "s .~ u O Y[ s` ~5 ~~ Y 0 5 a~ y• Y~ 9~ ~~ _"e 0 8€ « `~ 3 ~~ 00 a • .~E s~a~~ ~~ ~ ~' ~~- a~a~ ^ &«a' z _ G G.§VDC _ o«Ea«Y° VM ~ ~a~ '`3 ~ ~ss:~ y $6 SYav N VI SIZJ 'i `s ~ a3 ~Za i m ~ ~~ a ~8' ~y~& € b o SS 335 b b p~ m0 PTg mm e ao m \ q 0 m q 0 q 0 m P 8r~ C 83a o Nom' ~ ~ r ~~1~~ 4 fr d~ ~~ee ~ Y is ~•V•~O ~O V~y6M 40 s ~ 40 V ~N~ > K _ ~ N~ ~ v ~ 9 V Y Q~ ~ M~ a 1 O y ~ ` ~ ~a~t g a 4 s ~ ~ €~ p ~se °S Y ~<~ ; ° e s ° ~a c c x ' e [ ~~V y a W~06 D L y 00 ~ + L ~ dIE • >YOtl j ~+ r N N ~ N ~3 `~ v N v_ v v_ o e o_ _° ° 4 _ _° - b b b b b b b b S q~q qPq P qPq ~ qPq T qPq e N 0 m m m 0~ 0 P e m 3 0 ~yyyy ' 3 ~ +~i8 i L ~ ~' V ~' 6 _~ £ V ~M Q r N~ ~ 8 g ~ € ~ 8 ~ ~! ~ 3 8 ~~ 5 V Y Y Y Y q ~ ~~ 7 F Lt tt~ 3 9 Wi s ~+ N Ai Y N V n m q m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 Tn~ raw r,.~~...~i _-~ ~......___~_ FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose. Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: Report on the implementation of the provisions of Public Improvements requirements for Commercial/Industrial/ Institutional Buildings RECOMEIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the modifications to the requirement of offsite street lmprovewents for commercial/ industrial/institutional buildings as proposed in this report and direct the staff to proceed with Lhe amendment to the appropriate code sections. DACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The requirement to dedicate Hissing rights-of-way and to construct missing offsite street improvements for any new development protect, other than subdivision, is governed by the provisions of the City Code Section 12.08. As a condition for issuance of building permit for these protects, the code ream rec the aoolieant to Mdi ca to mi ccine rlahtc-of-wav and to lnctall all missing street improvements along the frontage of the property. Some exceptions to the construction rules are applied when a permit is sought for bull ding alteration, reconstruction, addition up to 650 square feet to a single family residence and certain accessory structures to a single family residence. No provision exists in the code for any exception to the offsite improvement construction requirements for minor addition to a comaercial/ industrial/ institutional building or for ancillary structures. The City Council has previously raised same concern regarding the fairness of these requirements far commercial/industrial buildings. The provisions of the code 1s based on the basic premises that this type of developments increase traffic flow and thereby compromise the safety of the general publtc. Improvements to the adiotning sireot mitigate that adverse impact. In reality, ft has been found that construction of certain type of additional structures and/or expansion of an existing building to a certain extent does not intensify the present use of the property, nor does 1t generate any significant additional traffic to warrant full frontage improvements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REDORT FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 2 CONCLUSION: tlasea on Lne aeore il,iu i,iy>, N,e Sufi SS ,e~ui,~,e,iuiiiy -- - --- --- appropriate sections of the Code to exempt from the requirements of offsite construction improvements for: I. Cumulative additions to existing commercial/institutional building up to 500 square feet and industrial 6uildino up to 1000 square feet. Dut not Wore than 50t (percent) of the floor area of the existing building. 2. Ancillary structures Lo commercial/industrial/institutional building (i.e. structural covers over existing outdoor storage, PAP house, carport structures over existing parking stall and similar structures) which does not intensify the present use of the property. Ancillary structures, as noted here, do not create any increased traffic activities in the area. The expansion of an existing building to the limit as proposed does not require, according to the Development Code, multiple off- street parking facilities indicating comparatively insignificant traffic impact on the ad.)oining streets. Exemption of the offsite construction requirements for these pro,)ects w111 not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the residents. It is also recommended that the existing code provision for "Exception' be amended to provide additional clarification as follows: A. Alteration which does not intensify the use of the structure. B. Maintenance and Reconstruction 1n kind when the cost of which does not exceed SOS (percent) of the value of Lhe existing structure. C. Addition to a singte family residence when the cumulative additions do not exceed 650 square feet. Should the City Council concur with these recommendations, the staff will work witn the Ctty Attorney and prepare an amendment to the Code Section 12.08 to Incorporate the above modifications for your consideration. Respec ~f~//ysubmitted, v.srr"%i ~. /G~~`-~ R Attachment: Copy of City Code Section 12.08 ~~ I 12.08.010--12.08.020 B. Any person violating any of the provisions of sub- sections A, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, R,~ L, M or O of Section 12.04.010, after having been once advised that such activity is unlawful, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished -_ __ _ <~r ,~~. •hwn six months or fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. BS $52, 3, 1979). Chapter 12.08 DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY Sections: 12.08.010 Declaration of need. 12.08.020 Streets and highways--Dedication requirement. 12.08.030 Offer of dedication. 12.08.040 Construction of public improvements--Require- menLB. 12.08.050 Construction of public improvements--Excap- tions. 12.08.060 Construction of public improvements--Additional requirements. 12.06.070 Construction agreement. 12.08.075 Reimbursement agreement fee. 12.08.080 City standards. 12.08.090 No encroachment without permit. 12.08.010 Declaration of need. The lack of full frontage improvements a joining a of or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or parking lot is found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians and vehicular traffic and detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the city. (Ord. 58 41, 1979). 12.08.020 Streets and hiahwavs--Dedication reauirements. No bui3ding or structure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be improved for parking purposes, and no building permit shall be issued therefor, unless one-half of the street, which is located on the game side of the centerline of the street as such lot, hat dedicate^_ _*i9hc-D*"-way fnr the full width Of the ivt along all street frontages so as to meet the master plan and/or standards for such street. In addition to required dedication for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sewer, water or other utility purposes may also be required in connection with building permits where such dedication is necessary to prevent the flooding of adjacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to required utilities. (Ord. 58 52, 1979). ~/' 1 149 (Rancho Cucamonga 11/82) 12.08.030--12.08.060 ~- 12.08.030 Offer of dedication. In the event construe- tion o u frontage provements is not immediately required, any person required to dedicate land by this section shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate property, executed by all parties having an interest in the pzooerty including beneficiaries and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current preliminary title report prepared by a title company approved by the city engineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by the city attorney and the city engineer, and shall continue in effect until the city council accepts or rejects such offer. iGrd. S8 s3, i979j. 12.D8.040 Construction of public improvements--Requize_- ments. Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing oz arranging for the construction of any narking lot or commer- cial, residential or industrial building, or buildings, or building addition or alteration, shall provide for the construction or installation to city standards, of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving to the centerline of the street, and necessary drainage structures unless such improvements already exist along all street frontages adjoining the lot on which the building or parking lot is to be constructed, enlarged or altered. (Ord. 58 y4, 1979). 1?.08.050 Construction of public improvements--Excep- tions. The provisions o Section 12.08. 40 shad not apply to: A. Alterations; d. xecons cruccion; C. An addition to a single family residence when the addition does not exceed six hundred fifty square feet in area; O. Construction of garages, carports, storage buildings, patio covers, swimming pools, spas, and similar structures, accesscry to a single family residence. (Ord. S8-A 51, 1979: Ord. 58 55, 1979). the building official shall deny issuance of a building parmi t, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility connections to any building or parking let until required full frontage improvements exie*_, Or are ^nnar rnnrn A_ nr rneir rnnatrurtion is guardnEeed by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the city in a sum approved by the city engineer based upon one- and-one-half times the estimated cost of construction. B. In the event construction of full frontage improve- ments is not required to be completed within six months after the issuance of the building permit, the city engineer moy, at his option, require that a lien upon the property to be improved be created by contract between the owner and the (Rancho Cucamonga 11/82) ^1~~ 12.08.070--12.08.090 city as security for the performance by the owner of the construction guarantee agreement instead lof a cash deposit. in the event a lien agreement is required pursuant to this section, no building permit shall be issued until the lien - _ _ _< ..c .wa ,.nnnrv recorder dyreement L3 Lew .._.. -.. _ _ ___°__^ of San Bernardino county. (Ord. 58-8 Sl, 1980: Ord. 58 S6, 1979). 12.08.070 Construction agreement. The construction guarantee agreement snaLl be effact~ve or. the date of the deposit of casn and snail --.. uic: t.`.e .ictc cc c-^^'-`:"° r^ the satisfaction of the city'engineer of all improvements required to be made. Upon completion of the improvements and their acceptance by the city, the cash deposit shall be returned to the o-+mer. The city is authorized, in the event of any default, to use any or all of the deposit money to cause all of the required work to be done or completed, and for payment of all costs and expenses therefor. Any money remaining shall be refunded to the owner. (Ord. 58 57, 1979). 12.08.075 Reimbursement agreement fee. If a frontage improvement was constructed under or pursuant to a reimburse- ment agreement between the city and another person along a street adjoining a lot or parcel of land on which a building, or other structure requiring a building permit, is to be constructed, altered or enlarged, then: A. The applicant for the buiidiny Permit shall pay to the city, at the time the application is submitted, all sums necessary to pay the reimbursement sum apportioned to ou~I, 1~ _- -----.. ~ ttie •o.+.o n4 rho roimbUiSement agree- ment; andV B. No building permit shall be issued until the sums required to be paid by subsection A of this section are paid. (Ord. 170 S1, 1982). 12.08.080 Cif standards. The city engineer is authoiued toestaElish-'stanTards Eor the construction and installation of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving and storm drain structures. (Ord. SB S8, 1979). 12.08.090 No encroachment without permit. No building, structure or parking lot s a be erecte , enlarged or altered if it does, or would, encroach upon any public easement or right-of-wav unless ar. crcrcachm°nt permit is first obtained from the city engineer. The city engineer may grant an encroachment permit if he .:atermines that the encroachment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. (Ord. 58 S9, 1979). ~~ 151 (Rancho Cucamonga 11/82) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATEt February 7, 1990 sv: nay... a„w .,.m~.,era c. the Clty Council FROM; Diane O'Neal, Adminietrativs Anelyat BJBJECT: CONBTDERATION OP A R680LDTION TO DE AND AN ALTmWATE TO 86rtVE ON D COUNTY-HIDE SOLID NAST6 TA$E POAC6 AB REOUIRW UNDER As 939 RECd00a7DATI0 It ie recommended that the City CouncLl designate a delegate and en alternate to serve on a County-Hide solid Waste Taek Force ae required under AB 939. BACEOROUIiD As 939 Le legislation mendnt ing that local ~urledlctione develop adequate provieione for solid Waste handling cansietent with regional needs. The legislation requires that on or before March 1, 1990, a County-Wide Solid Waste Taek Force be Formed to easier in coordlnat ing the development of both county and city source reduction and recycling elements. The membership of the task force shall be determined by the Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities within the county which contain a majority of the population in the county end may include repreeentativee of the Solitl wae[e industry, envLronmental organ ix at ions, general public, epaclal districts and affected governmental agencies. The County of San Bernardino, through Lte Solid Naate Advisory Council, made a reeommendetion et See January 25, 1990 meeting that the propoeetl membership of the County-Witle Taek Force ba composed of elected City off ieiale (ta be desig- nated 6y the City Selection Committee with a suggeetad regional dletri6ution7. members of the Board of SupervLeore sad public and profeeelonal represent at ivea. This was not the coneeneus of the City elected repressntntivee et the Solid waste Advisory Council meeting. The City elected officials attending the Solid Nests Advleory Cuuncil recommended the Taek Force be mode up of the twenty-two cities within San Bernardino end that these twenty-two cities be the voting members of the Task Force. TO 86RVE 011 A EDLID MAS'lz TAER FORCE PER AD 939 February 7, 1990 Page 2 Subeecusnt to the January 25, 1990 solid Waste Advisory Council meeting, repre- sentatives from the twenty-two cities within San Bernardino county held a meeting on January 29, 1990 in Ontario. The purpose of the meeting was to disease the formation of the County-Wide Teek Force. The consensus of all parties present was that each City adopt the attached reealution and forward the adopted reeoluiion t0 Che board of auperviavra. 'na wbjac -.- .." dry 1990 meeting was to inform the Board of Supervisors collectively through the attached reaolutian that the Taak Porce be mnde up of the twenty-two cities within San Bernardino. Finally, the offices of thn Solid Waste Management Department requested the attached questionnaire be completed. Staff confirmed in writing that the City wished to participate on the Tnek Porce end that the reaolutior. before you tonight would be forwarded to the solid Naete Management Department nEter the ~fo~eta~l a~d/option by the City Council. ~\ U "lly eubmi ed, - Oiene O'Neal Adminietratlve Analyst nn /anf 90-056 Attachments ~~~ JAN 26-90 FFI g;qp ONTARIO CITY HALL IST FL FAX N0, 7143812567 R. 03 •q aate,e Olsn N.. +, e . e:~ sewp,eses eaN e«neaaw, CA sut a . peel set.oiee~"iu. ~-0a~o 91(h1 wxu pnsta,~NO Teak force pwsttonneira The Chairman of the Sa11d Waste Advisory Council of San Iarnardino County has asked the Soiid Meste Management Oepartmant to prepare an action item for the tebruary S, 1990 meeting of the County Board oT Supervisors regardtn9 eomDOat lion of the state menARr.d Setfa ue... Task Force. We would appreciate your Tnput. Mr, Ntkals is interested in detsrmintng the degree of Interest uch city nos in pertltlpeting 7n ;o11d Maste Tuk Forco meetings to response to nQuirdnaints of A1939. Our goai is to fmpleaient a workable tuk force witA meatmun public input end a minimum number of partlclpants. The envfsl0ned Task Force would be composed of elated offietats as city ropresentetlvp. it wou10 be most helpful 1} you would answer the following puestlon and return to us via fax (714) 357-0130 a soon a feasible so that wa _ ___ _ .. Y... J... • .w . A,i ~ ~::.~. ~v~. V Jt 4 • ~ pil V) nN11Y~J1 WiIYU'J LOI L0711. rwwl Trew to contact 8111 Sterling st (714) 317.0100 for addlttonal lnfornatlon. Thenka for your uslstanN. puestiom.: Goes your city wisA to perticlpata In regularly aoheduied, monthiy agetings of the ;a11d Neste Taak Foroe to Mer items end formulate raommsndatlons to the Beard of Supervisors and Clttea on ;altd lksts i uues t ' Yee K Subinitfyd Iy,_ Jerry Fultvood, Deputy City Manager yp . NO City of Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~P~Q~ ~+wat .r..:.i:r: 7 s~.r. r iw.w.eq ~ ~a~ ^nu•4~~rv rnmt curt Jar cr ;gl Nt'NA tIFUCt~~ .pnOWMI L1fIM741 ~14U141N0e0.1M .. .'MMOWt:1.V.''~ tt ~ ~~~+'.t~l. h+.rn.rt.lw ~ .qY U~ Milt,ai ...... ~ .. ~ aau.d Olnee! IAFkY WAt.!tCn . .. Puu4. Desna inc. 61, ~ ~ r, • .p;.. ;y.,.' Orl o' Rn9en" l NaMwd:K . FN OMrho Irwr t r:oi$tiatiu .~t9eX stf/m DSIOS ; adE9a : Oe-St-i i'ziun~0 oulpnuaae ues:~a ~iia RESOLUTION N0. 90-**t A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMBERSHIP OF A SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE REQUIRED UYDER A.B. 939 AND DESIGNATING n icEF"n EScii inTl'i~ ,vw 1LT,.~.~:.°.TE rn~u ruE ~rrv nc Peu run CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, Section 409540 of A.B. 939 provides that on or before March 1, 1990, each county shall convene a task force to assist in coordinating the d eveiopment of city source reduction and recytiing elements; and NHEREAS, the membership of the task force shall be determined by the Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities within the county Which contain a majority of the population in the county; and WHEREAS, membership may include representatives of the solid waste industry, environmental organizations, general public, special districts, and affected governmental agencies; and WHEREAS, each city within the County is an affected governmental agency under A.B. 939. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby reso7 ve a; follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves thn mamha r¢hio of tha Task Fnrca reau fired ander Sec tinn 469540 of A.B. 939 only to consist of one representative, who is an elected official, from each incorporated city within the county and one representative from each county supe rv isorial district, and provides that each representative may be represented in turn by an alternate who need not be an elected official; and SECTION 2: Representatives of the solid waste industry, environmental organizations, general public and special districts shalt not have voting status as a member of the Task Force, buy may, as determined by the Task Force, be included as participants of the technical subtommtttees of the Task Force. SECTION 3: The elected representative for the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be * The Alternate representative shall be SECTION 4: All elected officers of the Task Force, including Chairman and Vice Chairman, shall be determined by the members of the Task Force. ~~~ :{ DATE: February 1, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coun/c^i~l1/~ FROM: Councilman Charles J. Buquet, II ^'_ SUEJECT: NORDIC NOOD9 I lR11M1N0 DBPICI8NCI68 Since the last City Council meeting, an additional Saeue has arisen in the homes constructed in the original Nordic project on the east aide of Hermosa. Framing deficiencies have been discovered in previously concealed attic portions of two homes, both of the same floor plan. eased upon Lhe above, ae well ae previously discovered def icienciea, I believe it appropriate to have a third party, acceptable both to the City and homeowners, be called in to provide a detailed ae easement of the impacts of this latest discovery. This person would have to possess unique qualifications that would enable them ,.o rsndsz a pzcfeesiornl engireerirg cpiricn regarding Lhe Qefic iencies, determine fl practical construction approach to a reasonable solution, and at the same time, reduce the reaourcae impact upon staff. In discussions with the euilding Official, he hoe suggested that the City consider Mr. Robert Sullivan, Professional Engineer of Upland, who poeeeeeea that unusual combination of backgrounds. Mr. Sull ivan'e firm currently provides contract plan checking service Eor the euilding and safety Divialcn. Hie background includes approximately ten years ae a general contractor and twenty years ae a civil engineer. Prior to forming hie current consulting and contract plan checking firm about ten years ago, Mr. Sullivan served ae Building Official for the Clty of Upland through the preceding ten years. In discuss ion with owners of one of the two homes affected, they have indicated thnt someone of that caliber woultl supplement our in-house talent, ae well afl provide an independent reconvnendat ion. This could be accomplished on a consulting baste with the euilding and Safety Division under our current plan checking agreement. It ie my ceconmendation that the Clty Council endorse this approach end direct staff to handle this ae a priority matter. Aa with ell matters, I remain available to answer any questions you may have by contacting m• at your earliest convenience. CJe/dje cc: Jerry Orsnt, Building official ~y9 ~- ,,.m~ee€~' s a~ mewmmm~_ ., ~~ - ~W ma ae- s.ar W~~ ~mmmemmm _ ', as W e _fi9i m' - F~ rt .. ., - .-p- ',~ ~ -- E ~g. ~~.. ~~ -V - _.~ €~_ -. - o_ ~ LYe > NS~~.;8g~.Xk ~. _ __ ^_~ s FNe'gls eF ~ _ ~II ~~ _ 2ae~= ~~' _ ^$. 3 S I? I Y 3.'. 8 m1 YJUYy4 ` c,~L 3 ; .. _ .. _ e ~ .. I. v .. ... ~~r.Y `~~'~. ,'L i I LY~is F£yp: ~3: ~ $ g ~ IAp~ _33 iiii _ _ Y u ~~Sd5~~F~~ ~~ C8y Y g k E u i~~ ' ~ ~~~ ;tl i'a :a L e _ S&&s&Ss~>8S~38Ss8888eBE&R&8&>s >&P&&&8&8s8 p~ „-,c,_..,,.,,,....v„..,.~~k#8^.238e3eB0o ^.SS~~:S ^o 'o'$~R m P m ,~ °%.°'.e~R~9,S~'^%%rR3°%£88RR8%S~nR ~~ a W AC%.~^.R^~~ °~8v~~r~RF4,~R%~~Y~8§SS~R88%4RRR eem«m.. ..,>.-m .- .,mm..~.. ..~am m m» =R%R%X8485N sP.e>~ m Q ^ $o ~Q ~8 1 %€Ko°~^>%8%8S%8° r%%ee eti%%o8% 3%%8%%%%Y$~ °SSS%SS PaP -„'p gS°>SSo Q Po-~SSB&Pe&S ~ ., . _ _ r ~~ __ 888$8x° -"88888 88$88 zR 8RR o _^F% 38%%3e~mE`='Eg888R8%e% L %8°8fi E88 °s.%o -- a' _ _ ... sve _CR~aB°°>SK86S°_£sSe _ rmoov~n ogffi Ste- .. e ~°~~ 8$8$°b m.°. 88$88888' 8888888$8- 8$$°o $8e8 °o 88 %~F.cm:?>8%88%%8v^m~%88%eOeB%8% R $8eR%%%oK€% _ G - s3a ed4a~NSSSE€~Sd..Sfi _„~.,~,-°RS &' w e. P~~ .. ., ~.. _.o c c_e - ee e c eRWo ~. ~.- .56 ~ $ i'~° ~ S.~V i~` .. Y~~ ~ p p a ~ ' ~ '. 'R_a ~. ~Y'9"YR'S. %~' W'9.93°9ago .~° ~y"a"~e~.°'' _ a "' ' ' ~ ' ~.. 'a J ' ^ ry # , ~ , ~. .. a Y ~ ~ C ° ~ ~ d ~' G ~~es~ B~fC^g^^k^t b~^6^ a aa^ y~gg y g$g6~a~ k~~WjW~GYkf k' , .. '~ h938SS~i33g8.,G L..fl~ffi5-. a.~~Fy~S~,e~ kfiECtl~M~a~W: ` 3 ~ ~~~ S ~ ~ 88~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~. . G~~8$~~~$S S~B ~ ~8 8~8 8 ~~ ~ & §X e /~ ' .~sasR~PPg~&~&s.~Ra&ga~~s :~ _ e>.. mm s m w m ~. ., _° ea~ ~ngci. °s ^'s $~in$°-°s m m F- m m a@ m..m m ..~ 3°"8R8.^.BL '. .°.°.°,S &g88°m .;FRB ', .°oBFk °e - e -,° .n~mmmmmP m .ti . m. d 9 m ~~ . . ° s ~Be ~. . Rs~RRR`a'8 °3~~RRoB°8R8Ro%R= 8 G 3`: _ - - ~RoR=e8fr=A8frRefr=`°~Se 8 Sft Re ~ o8~~^aR ~.°°,8oR~8°~°S~ ASR _ 8388,8=°__ 8S_ 888° ° ~£.~ _~LRFF~~8oo88~oe8~88o2~ ~.. e ~. e ^<Y€ RE - m -. S F6fPeS€RS~£Fe&3~S~e6>SE~R~ - n.~Z .. J ' ~? sae aa~ ~¢~ ~`sa .::~ F sa n k 34~ § G 4 ~YYI Ni ~o AE~ ! C -~ ~ ... .. : a ,,. .. M ~ y ~ ' ... I g A V tl 1 S 6 d ~. ~ ~ , yk.'~ ''£"9Cez.°86iF:'-'C'~:>F:5~ qB_~a tl~$ S ~ ~ N ~ ~~ $$ ^ ~~ _ C r ~ ~ pp ~ .. ~ ~F~~§~~~~~8~~ e ~$ Sed°~ R S $ $ ~R '~ o ~~ ~~~= __ N SR - - ~~a ~~ m m m 5nr m ~ ~~ 4e 9 ~ ~~~5 P. °~~ 4 a m9.m RI B L~ _-e~ 5,. °3 ...~ ., °S~ ;g § 3 g"° ' 8R £~ CSC 3' :E _ e _ kZ _ _ __ _ ffi~ ~ ' ~~ ~V ~ l45 ~ . ~ _ ~ ` ' ~': ~aL ~e k M:y g 4 ~~ w b . ~ ~ ^ ^ p g ~ . ~ ~ ~ e v " a ~ a ~ e ~ ! ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 1 i 5 Y a ^ 8~ E ~~ 5 F4' e ~J 5 a% s c ~~- ~ ~ g:-.s n`°°~ a ~~ s~ - alb G s L '. 9 9~ ~ Y C ~' ~ IP % ~ k e $ ~~ ~ 6 ~ ~$ y ~/ m % X` > S e8 no _ ~ - ~ o - - iFa..:~:;= ~.'°- A S ~888Se 3e 5 Y= ~4 - -_ -a,-. ...... _ ~ ~_sP _ P~ a _ R e € c'c .. .. .. °... m _ _ ~ `ds PF'a ___ __ _ :a, t~4 1' F L 'F- ms' '- ~ve ~ =.. ~ ~ ~~ e e ~., e<. e ~r8`.~. ~KBa~R - _ ~ :Vti~ ^ _ ~S 5 C,s,~? = ~ a ¢ a A ::se u i : ° y~.~ K~k~. '9 wu ~ ' ' ~a f ~ y.sar~a y ~ 1 C Y Y .. u.. ~ ~ ;~~~~~ B~ ~~ e ve ~ e ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~7~~~ N ~ ~ ^ ~ y y pp y y 2^ ^ 2 a~i~iffi~S~IISi~~9 e3~ ~ y ~ . p p y :,~ M 3 ~ ~ ~ .,,, 44 5 9 ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ !~ a x ~ ~' ~ S ~ 8 ~ ~ , ~em$e~ Be~$x~~~ _ 2 Gd8~~ ~FR3{ ~~ ~$ ~ ~ y Y ~ e ~ .. •. 8 8e Re K S RS 8x ~. ~. s ~s ~~ ~ a=~ s o. , m ~ ,. ~€ GM m ___ qe a ~. _ _ __ ~ W ~ ~ ~ F ~8~s ~ ~ 5S ' '~ - _ o fl _ ~ s ~RS $ ~ _ , 5 2 B ° ° Y . ° 'UJ' . R:°_ ~~~ ~ So>aP &° ^ ~~ S g~~ Sa g_S__ 6 gf. ~, °pS 4°'. e6o= ' " n' '~ ° g Y~ a c c e .°.ik Sa' 4' .. a 8~1 ~ °.. A : $.$8.~ emo-m ' n -.~ .~ ~ __ n o . .~ u~~ a i ~ 6 n ~ t Xe ~ y W ~ ~ n F S M .~ ES ~ 6 ~'~ ~ ~]SS ~~ ~ pp ~ ~~ ~~ 8% ~ 8 8 e C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ S ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. NamA .o r~~.. °'-'-' BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civii Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the adverts si na of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Area II Neethyst Stone Drain and Street IeproveeM'nts, Phase I, Ynprovesent Protect, located east of Ae~etllyst and north of 19th Street, to be funded frawt Drainage Fund Account No. 23-4637-8865 RECDMIEIDATIOM: It is recoewended tMt City Council approve plans and specifications for the Area II Methyst Stone Drain and Street leproveeients, Phase I, tioproveeient Protect, located east of Aaethyst and north of 14th Street, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subtect protect plans and specifications have been coegleted by Madole 8 Associates, reviewed Dy staff and approved Dy the Cl ty Engineer. The Engtneer's estiaate for construction is 5308,904.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for February 13 and February 20, 1990, with the bid opening on March 8, 1990, at 2:30 P.M. Resp ~ sited, RHM:L . AttacheKnt f RESOLUTION N0. 9d ~ 0~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "AREA II AMETHYST STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TG iwicnTi aE i0 nECCi:L Bow. .:4EREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Area II Amethyst Storm Drain and Street Improvements, Phase I, Improvement Protect". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following wards and figures, to wit: °NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Councti of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:30 o'clock P.M. on the 8th day of March 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "Area II Amethyst Store Drain and Street Improvements, Phase t, Improvement Protect" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Ltne Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "81d for Construction of the Area II Amethyst StOna Drain and Street Improvements, Phase I, Improvement Protect". PREVAILING NAGS: Notice is hereby given that to accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character to the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rates of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, .the Director of the Department of industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem d~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 2 wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such de ierixinx limo iu ue pus ieu ai the joo siie. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid ', as; the.. ine general prevailing race or wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Leber Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1717,5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmer. 1n ary apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will alto f7. rho ratio ~s apprentices to journeymen Lhat will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen 1n such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Mhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days Drior to the request far certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in tralning in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Mhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship tralning on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0, when the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the adtainistration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,journeymen 1n any apprentlceeble trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1177.5 an1d 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. d CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FEBRUARY 7, 1990 PAGE 3 Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Sndustrlal Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the M ~+~+~~ ~< ..... ___.. __-~ -_ - aids and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and arty subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to da with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter i, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (e) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (108) of the amount of said bid es a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the oroonceA rnnrrarr +s ~ha ~,.a_ +~ .~..,+e~ to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowesk bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1005) of Lhe contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50s) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the perfor>.ance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, oe any work or lobar of any kind bone thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering M s employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor wham a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d