Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/03/07 - Agenda Packetn u CITY COUNCIL ACFNi~A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI.fONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m March 7, 1990 Lions Panic Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga •~• City Councilmemben Dennis L. Stout, Mm~o. Pamela 1. Wright, counrnmrrnDe. DeMrah N. Brown, Mnyo. r,..ren. Charles 1. Buquet, comrnm.n,er. William J. Alexander, coundtmemG. •r• ® 'I City Office: 969-1851 Lions Put 980-3145 Jack Lam, au'~Ho~os=. J ali1GD L. IYlal lllllall, Ul1'A/(Om[,v Debra J. Adams, any cr.rr City Council Agenda March 7, 1990 PAGE ADOSNOUM NOl03ER 1 TO CITY COONCIL AGENDA CONSENT CAL&NDAR i A. COIf88NT CALENDAR She folloNiag Coasaat Calmadar itmma arm arpmciad to Dm routias and non-eoatxovmraial. Shay Mill W acted upon by the Council at oaa tiw miLboui diacusaiom. Anp ita wp bs ramrod by a Councilarbar or mmmbar of eba audisaw for diacuaaion. V 1. Approval of Mep, Improvement Agreement, Improvement 1 Security, Future Relmbureemente, and Ordering Lhe Annexsilon to Landscape Maintanence Oietrict No_ 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nom. 1 and 2 for Tract Not. 13890-1 and 13890-2, located south of i Ennyen Street, north of Hlghlend Avenue and wamt of Deer Creak Channel, submitted by Hommetead Land Development Corporation. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 90-078 A A83OLUTION OP TIRt CITY COUNCIL OF TfOS CITY O1 RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AOR66NSNT, ~ I IMPAOVel~NT 36CURITY, AND FINAL RAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13890-1 AND 13890-2 ~ Re3OLUTION NO. 90-079 Q A RESOLUTZON OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUC7IMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TH8 ANNEIUTION 08 CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAZNTBNARCB DIBTRICT NO. 1 AND 8TR68T LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOB. 1 AND Z POA TRACT NO3. 13890- V I I I I 1 AND 13890-Z CIT" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire. Ci tv Fnnt nnnr BY: Phillip Yerbera, Assistant Civil Engineer SU"oJECT: Approval of Map, improvement Agreement, improvement Security, Futnre Ratehurcnmante anA nrdnrt n~ •bo ~r~_~~t•~- - -',..;cape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting .Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Nos. 13890-1 and 13890-2, located south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Homestead Land Development Corporation RECOI~ENDATIOM IL is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tracts 13896-1 and 13890-2, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the anrrexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement, to cause Bald map to record and approve that system development fees be used for future reimbursements for work done within Deer Creek Channel right-of-way. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tracts 13890-i and 13890-2, located south of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue and west of Deer Creek Channel in the Medium and Low Medium Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1988, for the division of 40.2 acres into 166 lots. Phases 1 and 2 consist of 51 and 26 lots respectively. The Developer, Homestead Land Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security W guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements 1n the following amounts: TAACT 13890-1 TRACT 13890-2 Faithful Perfonaance Irrevocable Authority to Pay Letter: 5966,000.00 5178,040,00 Labor and Material Irrevocable Authority to Pay Letter: 5083,000.00 S 89,000.80 Monuoentation Cash Deposit: S 4,950.00 S 4,400.00 c1Tr couticll sTa~ REPORT TRACTS 13890-1 AND 13890-2 MARCH 7, 1990 PAGE 2 According to Planning CoA,aission Resolution No. 88-110, approved on June 8, 1988, the developer shad be eligible for reirbursements as follows: Item 4.b(1) System development fees for ail work within the -^_°r^.r-2~ P.i,ai~r~ei ri gbi-0l-way tf epprDVed by the Ct ty Council. If not approved by the Council, the requirement for the work within the Oeer Creek Channel right-of-way shall be waived. Anticipattng *hLt the City Cu~ncii would approve system development fees be used for this particular reimbursement, the agreements security guarantee amounts reflect construction being one within the Deer Creek Channel right- of-wyy as conditioned and noted in Bald Resolution No. 88-110. Copies of L'ne agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received fraa the Cucamonga County Mater District. The Consent and Nalver to Annexation fors signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Resp~fllll submitted, -~ ~ __' _ / ~ l_ RHH`: PY`ffni Attachments d' RESOLUTION N0. ~~- ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM7NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYINO IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13890-1 ANn 13AOn_9 WHEREAS, the Yesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 13890, consisting of Phases 1 and 2, 51 and 21 lots respectively, submitted by Homestead Land Development Corporation, subdivider, located south of Banyan Street, north of Hi Ohland AVenI1P ?nQ e?ef ~f nea.• r..m4 rw.,...et w_. ti--~ '••-t'-..: t'c+ .,.' •.. ~w of-Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval 6y said City as provided in the Subdivision Nap Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Lo meat the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with goad and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Maps offering for dedication for street and highwdy purposes the streets delineated thereon. NOIi, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 1s approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security 1s accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to forn and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said Cityy; and 4. That System Development Fees be used for reimbursements of all work within Lhe Deer Creek Channel right-of-way be and the same is approved, subject to approval as W prrocedure, form, and content Dereof by the City Attorney. 3 RESOLUTION N0. (~ `(~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRI70RY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. L AND STREET LIONTIN6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 r'un TwiCT NOS. i3irvli-1 AND 13890-2 WHEREAS, the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucaaronga, California, has previously foraxd a speCiat aaintenance district pursuant to the terms of Lhe "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highweys Code of the State of California, said special naintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Naintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the aneexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this ti Me the City Councll 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and i1HEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice a~ hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". ~.^.., T'ri~n«Oni, Tn[ ~~~~ CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII HEREBY 0.ESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: fiat the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work progra~a areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedingys of the Maintenance District, including ~PeTvy of all assessaents, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. urnw7 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAQRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 i 2 3 l 5 W Q 4 T e s Z ~o u ~~ ~ a w ,z r re ~. . so 4s 40 47 44 45 44 43 42 ai 40 aFMn 7 3x 33 34 33 3b 37 31 MARBELLA x3 DR. is ~w~ nl tel rolzolzi HIGHLAND AVE. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .~ STATE OP CALIFORNIA $ ~ u `~ L9 ZO xt C ~ u zs exMtl17 •%• ASSESSMENT DIAQRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 e 7 e s 4 3 2 I 9 \lo I ~q~/~2~ \( ~~` ~ l4 ~ ~~ > 33 3s ~ 72 Z 37 31 ~ 30 d 39 ~ r .9 ~ z, 0 17 ~ is I J 19 R ~ 21 22 z3 4 !5 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONaA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ `rl~~. EIWIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: TRACT NOS. 13890-1 AND 13890-2 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 166 d/u N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 166 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lanps to be Annexed District No. 1 --- 14 --' -° -" 2 22 ___ --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees _a ~.. u. ~w,..,,.h uw.~e c~ fh Cn ft Fa. 1 Leapn Ave, 5,439 52,063 128 JAA:3/7/90 PAGE City Council Agenda Merch 7, 1990 All itaea aubaSttad for the City Council Agenda oust 6e in writ iag. Tae dead line for aubeitliog tboe itua is 5t00 p.e. oa tae Nednuday prior to tae east Say. Tae Citp Clark's II office receiva• all auto iteaa. A. CALL TO ORDER I 1. Hedge of Allegiance to Plag. ' 2. Aoll Call: 9uquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Brown _, and Wright __ i 0. ANNOVRC610IIlTS/P R46RfATIONS 3. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring March 7, 1990 ae Arbor Day in Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Presentation of Proclamation Deeignating the Week of Merch 11-17 Girl BcouC Week. ' C. COMMafI[ATrnNa 1Rltw Tfle w Thi• is tae tLe and place for the yoeul public to addrea• tae City Council, stab law ptroaibita !be Citp Couocil iroe addreuing any Lsaa cot ondoua 1. ient.w.n ,.. re. . _ ~ Taa Citp Council up receive teakiaway and ut the otter for e aubaequeat eoiing. CoeeeaG an to be 1Litad to five ~.i einutaa per individual. D. CoR_ ggNT C~i.rexaA~ Taa following Coawet Calendar itoa era expected to be routine and non-coatroveraial. Thep will be acted upon bq the Council at one tLe witaout dLcuuim• Aup itp uy ba raeoyed Dp • Coua<SLenber Or eeeaer o! tae audioce for diwuuion. 1, Approval of Minutes: Pabruary 21, 1990 2. Approval of Werrania, Aeyiater Noe. 2/21/90 end 2/28/907 and Peyroll ending 2/14/90 [or tRS total amount of $1,750,966.95. 3. Approval to receive and Lila current Inveatont Schedule a• of February 28, 1990. 1 10 1 I PAGE City Council Agenda) Mnrch 7, 1990 2 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer 6 Wine ]$ for Mobil, Stat LOn Ope ratora Incorporated, 0677 Archibald Avenue. 5. Alcoholic Sewerage Application for off Sala Beer 6 Wine Iii 20 for Hobil, StatLon Operators Incorporated, 9315 Base Line. 6. AlcahOllc Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer s iJLne ~I 23 for Mobil, Station Operators Incorporated, 10477 Lemon ~ Avenue. ~ 7. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer For China 2$ Town Houee, M.X.L. Corporation, 9030 Foothill Boulevard, 1102. 8. i Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer fi Wine 27 Eating Place for Howe 11'e FeYm Houee Reet au rant, Judith L. and Richard A. Howell, 8733 Etiwanda Avenue. 9. Approval to amend starting time of City Council meetings. 2$ RESOLUTION NO. 90-097 i 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 77-5 DBTBAMINING TH6 DAY AND TIME OF CITY CCIINCTi. MvpTrune 10. Approval of resolution setting forth policy guidelines 31 for acquisition and development of future park facilit See. I ~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-098 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING POLICY GUIDELINES FOR ACQUISITION AND DBVELOPlHs'NT OF FUTURE PARE FACILITIES 11. Approval to initiate a Landmark Alteration Permit to move 33 the Ledig Houee (LSndmnrk No. 13) from 5702 AmethyeG St Yeet '_o a sae eaa of the Ranchp ruca..;_nga ~ Neighborhood Center and physical alterntlone related thereto. 12. Approval of the Environmental Initial study, Parts I end qp II, for the Highland Avenue Improvements from Hsrmoea Avenue to MayWrry Avenue and Lewanca Of a catagorlcel exemption therefore. City Council Agendal~ P.4(7E Merck 7, 1990 3 RESOLVTION NO. 90-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA, CALiPORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STVDY AND ISSVANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOA THE PAOPOSEO ' HIGNLANp AVENUB IMPROVEMENTS PAOH HERMOSA AVENUH TO MAYBERAY AVENVE 13. Approval to execute a Reimbursement Agreement Eor Undergrounding of Warhead Utilities (CO 90-040) for DR 86-13, located north of 9th Street, between Jineyard Avenue and Hallman Avenue, submitted by Meeeenger .u.6atmenc company - VR OOB. AESOLVTION NO. 90-100 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AEIMBUASEY3NT ACAEEMENT EXECUTED ON MARCH 7, 1990, FOA UNOERGAOUNDING OP A PORTION OF OVERHEAD VTIL STIES LOCATED NORTH OF 9TH STREET, BETWEEN VINBYARO AVENUE AND FtELLMAN AVENUE 14. Approval to execute a Re Smbureement Agreement for Undergrounding of Warhead utili[Lee (CO 90-041) for DevelOtment Rwvtow R'I-es i,.......a_ _ _ Avenue, between Bth Street and Ariow Rout® eubmitted`by The Fullmer Company - VR 005. RESOLUTION NO. 90-101 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OP RANCHO CIICAMONGA, CALIPORNSAr APPROVING AE IMBUASElQTNT ACAE6!ffiNT BXECUTED ON MARCH 7, 3990, FOR UNDEROAOUHOING OP OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON ROCHESTER AVENUE, BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND AKRON ROUTS 15. Approval to execute a Reel property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 90-044) from JegWe Banks, Jr. for s ~ing'le family resident, iocetw,{ nn lglal victoria Street between Etiwende and beet Avsnuee. 41 53 55 56 58 59 I!' lil i i I I i i i I ~! I i VIII City Council Agenda Harsh 7, 1990 PESOLUTION NO. 90-102 A RESOLUTION nv xuv ...~,... ^_....-__ __ _. ` Ix OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IHPROVEl~NT CONTRACT ANO LIEN AGAEEMRNT PROM TARES BANRS, 3R. ANO AOTHORI2INC THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERA TO SIGN THF, SANE i6. Approval to relea[e bonds for Tract 12650 Storm Drain located on the southwest corner of canietel Avenue and Deer Canyon Diive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (storm Drnin) $382,000.00 Labor 6 Material Bond $ 91,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-103 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELBASING THE FAITMPUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND THE LABOR AND HATEAIAL BOND POR TRACT 12650 STORM OM IN 17. Approval to eccopt improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13270 SiOrm Oraln lOCflted on the nn.~:...,... _=c--c „~ C„~~..u orrnnr anc Mllllken Avenue. Release Faithful Performance Bonds (Street): Storm Drain Foothill $686,000.00 storm Drain elm $146,000.00 storm Drain church $758,000.00 Accept Maintanence Guarantee Bonds (Street): storm Drain Foothill $ 68,600.00 Storm Orain 81m $ 14,600.00 Storm Drain Church $ 76,800.00 R83OLUTION NO. 90-104 A RESOLL72GN OF THE CITY COUNCIL Tna CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFOANZA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEM&NT9 POR TRACT 13270 STOAH DRAIN AND AUTHOAIEING THE PILING OP A NOTICB OF CONPLBTION FOR THB NORR PAGE 61 62 63 64 65 4 ~ PAGE city Council Agenda) Harch 7, 1990 18. Approvnl to accept the Vineyard Avenue RehaDilitat ion, 66 it between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevnrd, Contract No. ~ 9]-136, Improvements ae complete. ^'~^+'° ' c ° ~ , °ucnorxze the City engineer to file a "Notice of j ~, Completion." ~'~, i '~, ~I RESOLUTION NO. 90^105 6J naSOLUTIOH OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY ' OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ~, ~ PUBLIC INPAOVBlOSNTS POR THE VINEYARD AVENUE ' RERABSLITATION, BHTNHEN ARROW ROUTE AND ~ i I, ', ~ Foarxn.L RoDr,HV'_aD, .yD r.L^.T;DRIS n:;, :.:b rIL INu '~, OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THS WORK . 19. Approval to accept the Hidden a^flrm Road Cv lverir Contract 68 I i No. 89-104, Lmprovsmenb as caoplete, release Che bonds and authorize the city Bnglnser to file a "Notice of !i Completion^. ~ ~ i RESOLUTION NO. 90-106 69 A RESOLUTION OF TNS CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLIC IXPR0VE7gNT6 FOR HIDDEN FARM ROAD j ~ i CULVBRT, CONTRACT NO. 39-104, AND AUTHORIZING ~ THE PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLHTION POR THE WORE ~ i 10. Approval to accept the Hnvan Avenue and 19th street ~~ Improvements, Traffic Signal and Storm Drain Improvements ~ ~ ~ (CO E9-033) as complete, release the bonds and authorize ~~ the city Engineer to file a ^Not ice of completion^. RESOLUTION NO. 90-107 ~ ~1 i A RHSOLUTION O! THE CITY COUNCIL OF TN6 CITY I` OF RANCRO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINO THE ~ PUBLIC IMPROVBNENT9 POR TH6 INTERSECTION OP i NAVEN AVENUE ANO 19TH STA86T AND AUTNOAIEING i TNB PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION PDR TH8 WORE ~ I 5 PAGF. City Council Agendai March 7, 19901 6 E. CONSENT ORDIRANCEB Thu folloxing Ordiannens her. Sad public awnriaaa At th. ~+.. of iirsc reaaing. second rudiaga arm xEpxclW to p. routia~ and aoa-coatrovxr~ial. They x111 M ActW upon pp Lh~ Council at op4 tiw without discussion. Tha City Clark will read the title. Anp itq can be rgov4d for tliACUexion. 1. CiGi7~I0ERATZON OR R a '" C D SE VI E HAR E ~ /2 SCHBDULS AS RECOHMBNDED TO-THE CITY COUNCIL BY THB PUBLIC SAFETY WMMTSSION - Ordinance establishing service charge for the third and subsequent false alarm during any one year period. ORDINANCE NO. 409 (secmnd reading) 72 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ AMENDING TITLE 8 OP THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.26 ENTITLED "SERVICE CHARGES FOR FALSE ALARMS" AND PROVIDING FOR SERVICE CHARGES TO DEFRAY THE COSTS OP FALSB POLICB ALARMS -. ADVERTISED POELIC EEARINOB The fOllowiae +ls. b... wct_ __. "~_~.: ...3j vs pu.rw As -- public h~~ringA a rapulrM by law. The ebais Mill open the p4ting to racaira publie Gatiaony. 1. CONSIDERATION OP FNVIAONM+NTAL ASSE S RNm ND O INANC I IQ BSTA@L ISHING A PROGRAM EQ $ MITIGATION 08 SE LSMICALLY , :iAZAADOVS MASONRY BUILDINGS ~ ORDINANCE NO. 417 (first reatlirg) 79 AN ORDINANCE OP THS CLTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIPORNIA~ AHENDINC TITLE 15 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 42 REGARDING BARTHgUAAE HAEAAD REDUCTION IN UNREINPORLBD MASONRY BVILDINGS AND NAEING s'iNDINO3 iN BnPpnRT TPE.^3C^ 2. CONSIDERATION TO AUTHORIZE CERTAIN SERVICB CH+UIGES AS IOQ DEFINED IN ORDINANCE NVMBE~, 409. CHAPTER 8 E6 OP THE IUWCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. PERTAINING TO SERVICE GFD~?GEE POR P1LBE 1LAPJ!8 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I PAGE City Council Agendal March 7, 19901 RESOLUTION NO. 90-108 A RESOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL. ne mwv n___ i Iddvc3b cUCAHONGAr CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN SERVICE CHARGES AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE N0. 409, CNAPTER 5.26 OP THS RANCHO CUCAHONGF. MUNICI FAL CODE PSRTA INING TO SERVICE CHARGES POR FALSE ALARMS O. PVeLIC HEARINGS The following itesa have no legal publication or poativg requireeeata. Ths Chair rill opev the seating to receive public teatiwny. 1. EHINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOVIRE PVHLIC AIGHT-OF-NAY FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD PARCBL MAP 11838 PROJECT BETWEEN VICTORIA PARR LANE AND ROCHESTER AVENOB !12428 AND 12472 BASE LINE ROADI - Public Heerinq of protaata regardiny Eminent Domnln action to acquire public right-Of-way for the Baae Lina Aoad Nidaninq, Parcel Nap 11338, Project between VieiOrie Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the property located at 12428 and 12472 Baee Llne Road (APN 227-D9i-14 and 15) for the conettuct icn Ot street improvements acroa• the frontage of said property. CPQn~,,T gnu ~.-. ~- -vi ' ~ i A RESOLUTION OP THE CITX COUNCIL OF THE CSTY ' I I ~ OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NBCESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION I'il ~~ OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY ~~ ~ 07 RANCHO CUCAMONOA ANO HARING FINDINGS IN 'i ~ I SUPPORT THEREOF 2. X W I VICTORIA PARR LANE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE 112504 BASS LING AOADI - Public Hearing of protaate regarding eminent Domain action to acquire public right-ot-way for the Baee Line Road, Psrcel Map 11839, Project between Victoria Park Lana aid Rocheetor Avenue et t.^.O proxay lxated eE 12506 Baas Lina Road (APN 227-111-12 end 13) for the construction of eirNt lmprovamanta across the frontage of acid property. 105 106 tm 110 7 ~Y / I PACE City Council Agenda `e° ~ McYCh 7, 1990 8 I ~ ~' ~ ABSOLUTION NO. 90-110 ~ 112 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY :..-........., .,~~r.awm:nr CALIPOIWIAr OHCLARING TNS PUBLIC NBfiO ANO NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORT ZON OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OP PANCHO CVCANONGA AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 3. CONSIDEMT20N OF ADOPTING RESOLVTION ESTABLISHING UPDATED ORAINAGH PEES IN THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE AREAS RESOLUTION NO. 90-111 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGAr CALZFOid1IAr ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINA08 IMPROVBl6NT PEES POR ALL DBVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE fiTIWANDA/SAN SEPAINB LOCAL OMINAGE AREA OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA Tha following itaa do not lagallp require aap public UaLiwnp, although the Chair up open !ha ueting for public input. 115 117 1. nFOUnST TO A.woND CITY COUwC2L Po'ICY ON IiLBASS OB IZO OCCVPANCY POR TRACT 13697 ! ALY HOlLSI LOCATED ON TH6 WES'^ SIDE OP MAVEN AVB O TN OF I 2. CONSIDERATION OP A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ONE HSL6 140 SPACING SSTWEBN INTBRCit GE9 ON TlIB ROUTE 30 P HWAY - ReCOmawndation to adopt a resolution to indicate to Federal euthoritiee that a one-mile spacing of interohangea on the future Route 30 Freeway is eeaential to the City'a itaneportation program. f RESOLUTION NO. 90-134 I 141 A RBSOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOtiGA. Gi.PFORMA, OPPOSING THE FEDERAL HIGHNAY ADMINISTRATION'S DESIGNATION OF TN6 ROVTB 30 COARIOOR YOR TWO-MILE INTERCNAN08 SPACING PACE City Council Agenda March 7, 3990 9 b. COVNCIL BVSYNB88 The £ollowiaq ite~a have bean rsquuted by th. ^:~d ^- r„^' °^- ' [___--.,... rasp are not public hearing itap, although the Chair py open the peting for public input. I 1. DISCVSSION OP MALATHION SPRAY; AREA-WIDE - Information outlining actions taken 6y anrrowcd ing cat leg. I 2. CITY ADORES SING POLICY 3. CONSIDERATION TO NOMINATE A CITY REPRESENTATIVE POR THE SOVTHBRN CALIFORNIA WATBiL COMMITTFP Tbia is the tiN for Citp Comcil to identify the itoe thq wish to diecuas at the Wert pKing. Thee itgc sill not be diacutud at this acting, only identified for the next eeeting. R COMMUNICATIONS PROM TBB PUBLIC Tbi• i• the tip and place fos the general public to addreae the City Council. StaG laM prohiblU the Citp Council trop addreuinc sav /....~ -__ -- ,~.,w.iy iucauded oa the Agenda. The City Council py receive Nctipup and net the aatbr for a euDNquent Nctiog. Caaannte are to be Baited to five oinute• pas individual. NHETINO TO AAYOORN TO A JOINT MRATINO XITH THB RANCHO CUCANONOA CWSIUNITI FOUNDATION ON 101RCB 16, 1990, 7100 p.N. AT THB RANCHO CUCAMONOA RAZOBBONHOOD CSNTBR. I, Debra J. Adams, Clty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that n true, accurate copy of the foregoing agendn wan posted on March 2, 1990, seventy-two (72) hours nriop t0 tho :.Ant 1ld mr c:n.,.r^.t: t CW: Si961 at 9320-C Baw Line Aoad. 142 165 1~~ Pebruary 21, 1990 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL HINUTEE Aeaular Meet'no A. CALL TO OADHR A regular meeting of the Ciiy Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, February 21, 1990 in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Ao ad, Aancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was reconvened at 7:33 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Bu gust II, Pamela J. Wright, antl Mayor Dennia L. Stout. A1eo present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Harlmen, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manger; Jerry a. Fulwood, Deputy Ciiy Manager; Aick Gomez, Comnwni.ty Devaiopment D1recWr; Brad Huller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Ruae Mnguire, City Engineer; Joe Schultz, Community services Director; Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator; Jim Mart, nnm: n: ar.aH vo cuwlrno ni rwrr nre Dnanw Awkwr. Sr. Admin ietrative Assistant: Diane O'Neal, Adminietrat ive Analyst; Patty Riffel, Executive Assistant; Chief O snots Michael, Fire Captain D8v0 Eerry, Fire Engineer Chuck Lane, and Firefighter Tim Weasel, Rancho Cucamonga Fire PYOtection District; Captain Eugene Gilmore, Deputy Ruben Gonzalez and Deputy Jeffrey Hill, Rancho Cucamonga sheriff's Station; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. h • R • R B. ANNOUNCHMENTH/PRESENTATIONS al. commendation to Deputy Mibek, Fire Captain Berry, Fire Engineer Lane, and Firefighter Weasel far their life saving efforts of January 10, 1990. Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Dist riot, related the events Ghat led to the ._onr a(Inn pY rnp r_ ~gnnar ,.nna. Mr. Jae Wells expressed hie gratitude for Lhe four men and their ettorte in saving the life of his granddaughter. Mayor Stout presented the proclamations City Council Hinutea February 21, 1990 Page 2 B2. Presentation to Deputy Gonzalez and Deputy HL11 for their involvement in the Choices Youth Intervention Program. Deputy Go nzaLez thanked Councilwoman Wright for her eff orte on behalf of this program. Ri. .Tack Lam. City Manager, et ated that on item D12 0£ the Consent Calendar, Section 4A in Resolution No. 90-073 was being amenaea ae auomrrcea co ~cvi,~.. that night. 84. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that Item D21 was being pulled from the Consent Calendar. R R R R R R 0. COI®RIHICATIOHS PROM THE PUELIC C1. Patrick Coliins, 6596 Etiwanda Avenu¢, expressed hie concerns about Etiwanda Avenue being used ae a drag strip. He telt moat of the violators were not re aidents of the area. He stated that there were various facilit iee on Etiwanda Avenue that are used by children and it was dangerous to their safety. Mayor Stout stated that tRe Public Safety Commission might be able to ae sist Mr. Collir~e in addressing hie concerns on this issue. Mr. Collins was also concerned about the public water feed syeiem that was being installed, and one of the main storage [sake located diagonally from hie home. He statetl that several times the tank hea been overfilled, the moat recent occasion was last Thursday when the overflowed water froze on the roadway. He stated he contacted the SherLf f'e Department about black ice on the road at ease Line and Etiwanda, and was advised that there wne a crew on alts putting out sand and markers. He stated that when he went by the area aDOUt half an hour later there were no matkera. He asked Lf St would be poeaible to have a quicker response from the city Maintenance Department when incidents like that are reported. He stated one time the tank overflowed, and it took an Dour and a half for someone to respond. He was concerned with th¢ Waste of the water, and the possible safety hazard of the tank being overflowed into a flood control system. ....... adp.,ad ,.-. ,... .. !p t 1 tR _ t__ in hha nlty __ --nlgnllnd Fv CheVCUCamonga C¢untye Water District. •He stated that even though the Clty dote not have control over the water, they will contact the Water District and izy to work with them to solve his concerns. He stated the City had not been ewers the Water District was putting in the syatsa, until afisr the Dietrici had committed to do it. He stated they have bean having meetings with the Water District and are now trying to work closer with them on issues aftectin9 iha community. City Council Minutee February 21, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Collins stated he was concerned with the construction in the Et iwanda area, especially with the detour on Eaet Avenue. He stated there was a large pile of dirt on the corner of Eaat Avenue and ease Line Road that moat people could not net throuch, and if it gate wet then there ie a elide problem. Auas Maguire, City Engineer, stated the Maintenance Department worked during the last weekend due to the heavy storm and took care of all known emergencies. Ma stated that storm clean-up on the roadways was curreniiy underway and eat imated that it would be complete through the whole City by Priday, February 23, 1990. Mr. Collins then asked for an update ort the Rock Crusher situation. Mayor Stout provided Mz. Collins with some background on the issue and advised that the Council would be meeting later that evening in Executive Seaeion to discuss further action. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutee: January 26, 1990 D2. Approval of Natrante, Register Noe. 2/7/90 and 2(14/90; and Payroll ending 1/31/9U for the tat al amount of $1,836,876.70. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application foz off Sale Beer 6 Wine For Nobil, Station ..__-_. _-_ .___..____. _~ o~.. ... _.,... _.. n...._..., v.....n .ne ...a,...va.nv ov _r _______ _..___,.______. ___. ._.._, _ .. .. ... ...... ..-__ _._. ___.._._.. _. COUNCILNONAN WRIDBT. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Public Eating Place for Cask 'N Cleaver, The C & C Organization, 8689 Ninth Street. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General fur Alpha Beta, Alpha Beta Company, 9640 Baee Line Avenue. D6. Alcoholic Beverage Application far off-Sale General for Alpha Beta, Alpha Beta Company, 6753 Carnelian. D7. Alcoholic Beverage Application far On Sale General Eating Place for Sam's Place, Luanne R. Pellegrino, 6620 Carnelian. -_. apz'_'-- -c ~ ~. o_--n -..- .....------..y ... ...- ~w....~ .».,....g B moo" for the Baee Line Road and Accheeter Avenue TratYlc Signal- and •9etety Lighting Installation Project, to be Funded from Syeteme Development, Account No. 22- 4637-5943 (PY 89/90 City Council Minutes February 21, 1990 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCF.O rnCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLP.NS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "BASE LINE ROAD AND AOCHES3BR AVENUE 'rxaxx i:: ccc:r_ '"° SAFETY LIGHTING INSTALLATION IMPROVEMENT PROTECT," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHOAZZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D9. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Hide" for the Inetallat ion of Street Light a, locates on cha norii, o .._ ... Dec:. L...-... ..oc,. at Alta Loma High School, to be funded from Lightin0 District No. 1 Fv nds, Account No. 55-4130-8771 (FY 89/90). RESOLUTION NO. 90-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIPICATIONS FOR THE "INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTING ON THE NORTH SIDE OP BASE LINE ROAD AT ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL," ZN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND ^IRECTING THE CITY CLERK TG ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D 10. Approval to see aside the award of the Niillkan Av anus Nadia r. and Getaway Improvement from 4th Street to 6th Street, reject all bide and authorization to re-advertise for bide. RESOLUTION NO. 90-071 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOAN IA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA THE "MILLIKEN AVENUE HEDIAN AND GATEWAY IMPROVEMENT FROM 4TH STREET TO 6TH STREET," IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D11. Approval to Destroy City Documents ae provided under Government Cade Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 90-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ....-.-.-..-.. C.Ar.IFDO4T L_ PnTPl1P T7 T!iG THE DF.QTPItGTTAN DF ('TTY AECOADSnAND DOCUMENTS WNICH AAE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 D12. Approval of an appeal of the Plennin9 Conwieeion'e decision to deny e request for a time extension for a resldentiel subdivision and design ravlew of 96 single family lots on 13.98 acres of lnnd in the Tsrra Vista Planned Community des Lgnated Low-Medium Daneity (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) loceiad at the southwest corner of Terre Vlets Peckwey and Mountain Viaw Drive - APN 227-151-13 and 16. RESOLUTION WAS A1~7060. City Council Minutes February 21, 1990 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 90-073 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COVNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING mMHTSSTON'S DECISION TO DENY A TIME RATRNRTnN mo mo,_ „~-,- TAACT NO. 13303 - AYN 227-151-13 AND 14, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF D13. Approval of Parcel Map 12357 located at the southwest corner of Highland _, _ •...? *==-a- c _ _ -ubmitted by Southland Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 90-074 A PESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TKE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPN IA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 12357 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 12357) D 14. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Sierra Hadre Avenue Street Improvement Project from Arrow Route to Ninth Street and is euance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 90-075 A RE SOLUT ZON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAI. INITIAL STDDY AND SSSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOA TRS PROPOSSO uio.......~,..~ .... .......... .................. ...---__ ..._...-_._.. .._~__ _. NZNTN STREET D 15. Approval of the Envirorunental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Sa1Lna And Vinmar Avenues Improvement Protect from Calaveres Avenue to Sierra Madre and to 350 feet north of Saline on Vinmar Avenue; and issuance cf a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 90-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNC IL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STVDY AND ISSUANCE OP A CATEGOAICAIi EXEMPTION POR TNS PROPOSED SAL INA AND VINMAR AVENUES IHPROVEHENT PA0.78CT FAON CALAVSAAS AVENUE TO SIERRA MADRE AND TO 350 PEST NORTH OF SALINA ON VLNMiu A'va[iuE 016. Approval to award nntl execute contrnct (CO 90-032) with Nolff/Long/Christopher Architects for architectural and design services for the Animnl Care Fncility. Amount of contract not to ezcaed 5118,880.00, to coma from General Overhead Account 01-4285-6028. City council Minutes February 21, 1990 Page 6 D17. Approval to award and execute the Professional Services Agreement (CO 90- 033) fot Construction Surveying for the ease Line Aoad Street improvement e, Stcrm Drain and Traffic Signal Yhaee I and ZI, west of I-16 to V{ntnria Y?rU L3::e ~tojec:. t~ AssociaaaG snyinnere for the amount of $35,437.00 to he funded from systems Development Accounts Noe. 22-4637-8940, 22-4637-8941 and 22-4fi37- 8730, and Etiwanda Drainage Account No. 19-4637-8840 (FY 89/90). D 18. Approval to award and execute the Prof see tonal 9ervicee Agreement (CO 90- 034) For the Construct ion Surveying for the Arrow Route Widening Phases II, Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, project to Wagnez Pacific, Incorporated, for the amount of $17,064.00 to be funded from Systems Development Account No. 22- 4637-8735 (Fk' 89/90). D19. Approval to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 90- 035) for Design Services to Develop Construction Bid Documents for Don Tibureio Tflpia Park to Pu rkise-Rose Associates Ln the amount of $42,256.00 plus 101 contingency to be funded from Park Development Fund No. 20-4532-8770. D20. Approval to execute a Supplement to a previously approvefl Improvement Agreement of Tract No. 13930, located on Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street, for Systems Fee Credit and Aeimburaeawnts for a portion of Wil eon Avenue, submitted by Winb[ook Development, Incorporated. AESOLVTTON NO. 90-077 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO .:....:.......- ....--. _.,.. .._ _.._. _.._ _.._ _ _ _ _ nwvm env mve PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT OP'TPACT NO. 13930 2mrperetiort:~ ITEM REMOVED PROM AGENDA. i-+oio c City Council Minutae February 21, 1990 Page 7 D22. Approval of Hape, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street ... .. .: ___ _. _...w w^.. i ...n n a..- m._... e,.. >>aan anA 1ib64-1. ..ay.......y ..._.._____.._ _ located within the Terra Vista Planed Community at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, eubmitted by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-000 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE cxa2 Ur xAncnu CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SEC'JRI TY, AND PINAL NAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13664 AND 13664-1 RESOLUTION NO. 90-081 A RESOLUTION OF TNfi CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ORDHRING THE ANNERATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND 9TAEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 4 FOR TRACT NOS. 13664 AND 13664-1 D23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. i and b for DA 88-i i, located on the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue end San Bernardino Road, euMnitted by Edward R. Combo. ,TTI.M V/. On-nY7 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCNO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVINO IMPROVHMENT AGREEMENT AND INPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA OEVELOP!ffiNT PEVIEW NO. 88-11 RESOLVTION NO. 90-083 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIPORNIA, ORDERTNO THE ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO3. 1 AND 6 FOA DA SS-11 D24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12332-2 located on the south elde of Tacketem Street approximately 2000 feet east of ..o.e...,. o.. ...-„... od by ':.-. _ k. RESOLUTION NO. 90-084 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMHNT ACABEMENT HXTHNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SHCURITY POR TMCT 12332-2 City Council Minutes February 71, 3990 Page e D25. Approval to execute Improvement Extenaion for Tract 12902 located on the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Almond Street submitted by Nortlic Woods Tr RESOLUTION NO. 90-035 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT HXTENSION AND IMPROVBME:iT SRCOAITY FOA TRACT 12902 D26. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 8xtenaion foz Tract 13063 located on the east side of Saat Avenue between Highland Avenue and Catalpa Street, submitted by Citation Builder a. RESOLUTION NO. 90-OS6 A AESOLOTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13063 D27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extenaion for Tract 13318 located on Che southeast corner of Marmoea Avenue and Manzartita Drive, aubmltted by Mayflower-Hayoun Development. AE30LUTI0N NO. 90-087 a ova ni NT inN nv Tns niTV MnNn Ti. nw mNR PTmv nR 9AN!`Nn CUCAMONCA, CALI FOANIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT BXTENBION AND 2NPR0VEtffiNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13318 D28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extenaion for DR 57-19 and '20 located on the northeaat corner of 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Indumar Investments. RESOLUTION NO. 90-OSS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI £ORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMBNT SECURITY POR DR 37-19 AND -20 D29. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extenaion for DR eB-28 located nn tFn onehFO~a1 rnrner of Sv _`^-e ssamlu mA Vhihn nnY Agonyo, v-~nml.tod _hy Rancho Cucamonga Medical Part sera. RESOLUTION NO. 90-089 A ABSOLUTION OF TNB CITY COUNCIL 08 TNB CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNLA, APPAOVINO IMPROVEMENT AOREEMENT BXTBNSION AND IMPROVENBNT e8C0RITY FOR DR 08-23 City Council Minutes February 21, 1990 Page 9 D30. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Ext ens ion far Parcel Map 9897 located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, RESOLUTION NO. 90-090 A AESOLPTZON OF Ttffi CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVBHENT AGREEMENT ExrEnaaoN anu •ninG~a.~bl .;L......_._ ._.. _._....... ._.. 989. D31. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for TR 13476 located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Tryon Street. Release: Paiihful Performance Bond (SYreeY) $228,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Hond (Street) $ 22,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-091 A AESOLUT ION OF 2HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13476 AND AUTHORISING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POR THE WOAA MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright io approve the Consent Calendar, ae amended, lase Items D3 and D21. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • • R • R DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for OEf Sale Beer & Wine for Mobil, Skation Operators Incorporated, 8514 Vineyard Avenue. councilwoman Wright asked James Markman if he was aware of any other cities Lhat have passed ordinances prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages at gee stations. ,Tames Harkman, City Attorney, eteted the State Legislature adopted leglalatlon approximately a year ago saying that such a prohibition would not be legal. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, eaconded by Buquet io approve Item D3. Motion cerriea unanimously, 5-0. • • • . R « No Items Submitted. 4• R R R R City Council Hlnutea February 21, 1990 Page 10 P. ADVERTISED PUBLIC REARINGB No Items Submitted. ~ R R • x ~ O. PVBLIC BPJIRINGS Gl. CONSIDERATION OF FALSE ALARM ORD INAN(`E AND SERVICE CH GE SCHEDULE AS_ RECOMMENDED TO THE C CI a THE PURL G 5 B^ COMMISSION - Ordirtence establishing service charge far the third and subsequent false alarm during any one yo_ar period. (COntioved frog FaDruary 7, 1990) Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 409. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilwoman Wright stated that she hetl understood there was opposition to this ordinance and wanted it noted that no one had appeared in opposition at the meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 409 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IFOANIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO "SERVICE CHARGES FOR PALSfi ALARMS" AND PROVIDING POR SERVICE CHARGES TO DEFRAY THE COSTS OF FALSE FOLICE ALARMS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 409 and Bet second reading for March 7, 1990. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. . . . • w B. CITY NANA06R'S BTAPP REPORTS H1. REPORT ON OPEN SPACE STUDY OF FLOATING P c RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAAk ACOUISIT ION (COetl4uad trot January 3, 1990) Staff report presented by Dave Leonard, Perk Projacte Coordinator. Mayor Stout felt the priority should be Bet by the people living in the targeted areas and their willingness to pay for the coat of park melntenance. He stated that there might be people in one area who would be rssietent to the Ldaa, and people in another arse that were very will lag to have that coat, ouch ee the people In the Caryn conmunity in Aree C. Councilwoman Brown eteted that they have heard from some people In Ares C, but that if they ware to take a vote you could not be certain that all the people in Area C would be to favor of 1t. City Council Hinutee Pebruary 21, 1990 Page 11 Councilwoman Wright asked if it would be decided through a public hearing process for voicing protests as opposed to a "yee^ or ^no^ vote of each resident in an area. Mayor Stout stated that a public hearing was the legally required minimum, but he would like to have a plebeecite vote, such ae was done in the Rochester tract. Councilwomen Wright and Brown agreed the only way they vnnid hg .;.i ll: ••~ « decide the issue would be by a pleDeecita vote, which would have nothing to do with setting priorities. Hayor Stout felt ycu would only need to set a priority if two or more areas indicated they are ready to go with this plan. Councilman Buquet stated he would like the Council to target Area E which has been overlooked for a very long time. Councilwoman Wright stated there ie not a lot of apace available in that area for a park, and felt iC would be difficult to find adequate apace. Mayor Stout stated that if there was a good parcel available, and the opportunity was right to save it, he would consider getting the property even if 1C co uldn'l be developed right away. Councilman Baguet atnted the dwelling unite in that service area are very high, and fR1Y ihwTO ncoAnA •n Fo an a nRqu{hln rnnnPalinn of n...nn! !n 6e1.. .. ..i n.. balance for that area, and felt ifnaiepe were not taken soon to lock up a parcel in that area, the opportunity to develop a park would pace by. Hayor Stout thought possibly the area might qualify for Block Grant funds to help develop a park. Larry Henderson, Principal Plannerr stated they had recently conducted a Block Grant analyaie in Area E on the very question on if Block Grant money could be used for n park, and found that the perkaiiee that are nvaila6le are not in identified income level areas so Hlock Grant funds cannot be used. Councilwoman Brown inquired where the Lwo sites indicated or. the chart for Acea e were located. ila VR I.Rnna Yd. Pa T4 PYni p_rTe r n__T.i l _n a_!_n__T a_Y_a 1_u_.i n_ _ ____•_: n_n _ _ .Vh ..f O -^ . .^. .. wa .. .. ... ~ih Street, went of Madrone, which wee approximately 15 acres, and the other ono wee the old Labor Camp site and directly north of that. Councilman euquei felt that it they urore able tc lock in a site in Area 8, they could use Chet ae a marketing approach with the residents to work toa_ethar on developing and maintaining a park for that area. ACTIGNt Staff to bring a policy back Por adoption on the Consent Calendar nt the March 7, 1990 meeting. City Council Hinutee February 21, 1990 Page 12 • • • ~ • x Items H2 and H3 ware heard and considered together H2. CONSIDERATION OF MEMHEA6HIP IN THE WE T END CO JNICATION AUTHORITY - Consideration of membership in a Joint Powers Authority to operate an 800 MHz communications system in the West End. Staff report preeented by Duane Haker, Sr. Aamin iatrative Rae a.etant. Councilwoman Brown wanted to verify that for whatever monies and expendiiuree on equ ipmen~. or other items were allowed by the Council, a report would come back the next year auditing how those funds were actually spent. Jack Lam, City Hanager, stated yes, there would be a report back to Council RESOLUTION N0. 90-092 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PORMATION OF THE WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY H3. CONSIDERATION OF FORNING THE WEeT ND COM NI ATI GN FIN N IN AC OAITY WITH THE CITY OF ONT RIO - Conaiderat ion of a Joint Powota Authority with Ontario tc finsnce aq.:ipmant ac~:iaition for an 600 MHz conenunicationa system. RESOLVTION NO. 90-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, AUTHORIZING FORMATION OF A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY WITH THE CITY OF ONTARIO AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MOTZ077: Moved by Browny seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Noe. 90-092 and 90-093. Motion carried 4-1 (Wright, no(. • R Ii I coDxcu saslNESs L1. DISCUSSION OF WAYS TO LIMLT THE t OF ITY CO Li TIPU (COatiaued from February 7, 1990) Staff report preeented by Jack Lem, Ciiy Manager. CouncLlman Alexander stated the renmon he brought up the iaeue was because he did not feel Lhe public should have to wait until 2:00 or 3:00 a.m. to be heard. Ha liked the idea of starting to limit meetings at 11: C0 p.m. to have them f inleh by 12:00, and would be in favor oP starting the meetings earliec, but did not like Item 4 an the staff report 6ecauee he felt ii was eomet Lmee difficulC io schedule the number of meetings they already attend. City Council MSnutea February 21, 1990 Page 13 Councilwoman Brown stated that possibly if there were presentations that weze not tied in to a specific date, it might help if they Were held until a meeting where the agenda was not lengthy. Councilman Buquet felt that having meetings that lasted until 2:00 or 3:00 a.m. were an impoe it ion to people who wished to attend the meeting and participate in the process. He stated he hat Deen involved i.n other organizations that star tad witiv an open end policy on meeting times that woultl run very late, but wnen iney set a time limitation they found they were et ill able to accomplish the same amount of business or more in about half the time, and were able to conduct bus inset while everyone was still free h. He felt a Lot could be done in the planning of the meetinys and setting up of the agenda, to control how many items are on the agenda to try and even out the tLoee of the meetings. He felt if the Council targeted a time to end, such ae 11:00 p.m., that they could accomplish that goal the majority of the maeeinga. Councilwoman Brown stated that in the peat City Manager's Staff Reports and Council Buainese were at tae beginning of the agenda because they were controversial and they could be taken core of early while the public was there. She felt having them at the end of the agendn was fine ae long ae Council could get to those items in a timely mannerr but that was not happening. Councilman Huquet stated another thing he hat found helpful When preparing agendas was to set an aaL'cipated period of time for each itar,,, not wAth the intention of limiting diecuaeion but to help with budgeting time for the items on the agenda. Councilwoman Brown stated that SCAG shows a propoeed time for each item on their agendas to be used ae a guideline by the members for discussion time. Councilwoman Wright stated the felt the issue was that 6ecauae they are holding public meetings the focus ehouid be that the puhlic hat aright to see decieione being made that will affect them, end have the opportunity for input. She did not think the meetinge should et art at 5:30 or 6:00 p.m. because people who commute to their jobs would not De a61s to get back Ln Lime to participate in that proceae. Sha thought possibly they could start the Council meetings at 7:00 p.m. and have the other meetings afterwards, move the non-conttoversial items to after 11:00 p.m., and agreed with having no new issues taken up after 11:00 p.m. Councilman Alexander agreed with starting the Council meetings at 7:00 p. m. with sny °CA cr Fire Soard .-neetilgu ut>rt ins at o:3G o. m. Councilman Buquei felt that starting at 6:30 p.m. would mnke it difficult for some members of the public to attend the meetings. Councilman Alexander stated he felt the RDA and Pire eoerd should continua to meet pYior to the Council. Mayor Stout stated if the RDA and Piro Board meetings wars put at the and of thw agenda they could not be noticed because there would be no definite time. City Council Minutes February 21, 1990 Page 14 councilwoman Wright stated she had no problem with leaving those meetings at the beginning and just having them et art at 6:30 p. m. Councilman august felt that the meeting starting times did not need to be earlier, that they should be able to just finish all bueineeH by 11:00 p. m. He felt they should try to make changes incrementally, try to improve the time management on the agendas, and then if that dose not work, they can take a Look at c..a ny my `..z wzztu.g tiwea. Councilwoman Wright asked if they wanted to trV moving the consent items t~ 'he end of the agenda and to stop new discussion at 11:00 p.m. Mayor Stuut felt that a lot of people attend for the Consent calendar items and he did not want to see them having to waif to find out if they were approved. Re felt the Consent Calendar did not take that much time and that it might be inconvenient for the public to move Lt to the and of the meeting, but was willing to try limiting the meetings to 11:00 p.m. Councilman Alexander stated he did not want to rush through or postpone items in order to meet an 11:00 p.m. deadline. He felt the meetings should et art earlier because Lhey do not always have an RDA or Firs Bonrd epeting. He also did not want to s¢e the public limited in their comments and particlpat ion in the meetings. Councilman Buquet stated h® did not teal chat starting the meetings nail ier by half an hour was going to Improve or solve the problem. He lelt the problem the Council was facing was that they ware not able to set Lhrouah thw h++wina'na .• hand in a reaeonaAle period of Lima, that there were a lot of factors involved, and adding more time to the meetings was not the solution. Me Pelt they needed to work together to help curtail the length of some of the meetings. Mayor Stout elated that Home of the topics Lhat would usually be on Che agenda under Council Business could just be cavsrad by a report to Council, then if the consensus was that acilon needed to 6e taken, it could be placed on the agenda at that time. councilman Buquet stated that another way to menage the load would be to eprend requested reports out and not stack them all up on one agenda. Mayor Stout stated that he agreed wtth having special workshops on vary involved items, ouch ae the regional shopping nwll, ae suggested in the staff report. That way poo~L whn were only iaareztad :- Chat Gne item would nnr have to sit Lhrough a regular meeting to Da heard, end oleo Lt would not delay • regular meeting for o[her people by having lengthy diecueeion on one topic. MOTIONt Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to have eta!! return witA e Reeolut ion tar all awetinge to begin et 7,00 p. m. Motion curled unenlmouely, 5-0. • • • e ~ CLty Council Minutes February 21, 1990 Page 15 I2. CONSIDERATION TO APPOINT D GATE TO 5 RVE ON AOUTE 66 PRESERVAT GN COl4fI TTEE (Oral Report) Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community ..e.e.opment Diracto[, who sin Inc ..., .... ne sweiieg with the Comarttea next week, and that their general putpoee^ ie to try and preserve the historical characteristics of Route 66 trom the Arizona border to Pasadena. Mayor Stout stated he felt it was very important that come of the historical aiynificanca .,i Route 66 be included in me Footnilt Spec lfin plan, ACTION: Update reports to be sent to Council by memorandum. R • • I M h I3. CONSIDERATION tlF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF COUNTY'S DECISION ON TASK FORCE FOR AD 939 Report presented 6y Councilwoman Brown, who stated she had this Resolution placed on the agenda because the Resolution passed at the prior meeting was not the Aeaolution of the Board that hoe to be comprised of the County and the cities. She stated the original Aeaolution only allowed for thirteen members Dut was amended to include all twenty-two cities, and the two County staff members on the private/profeasional aide were removed, which reduced that number to ten. She felt the crucial aspect of the new Aeaolution was the definition of a "Dlviaion of the House^, that the private/profeasional members of the group do not have a vote on iaeuea Chai would enact legislation. Councilwoman Wright asked if the private/profeasional members got to vote, but that they could not override the public officials. James Harkman, City Attorney, stated they can vote, but that nothing can be adopted except by a majorliy of the public official e. Councilwoman Wright stated she liked the overall make-up of the private/professional members and the balance of organizations, but was concerned stout all members of the County Aoard of 6uparvisore being on this eoartl. Councilwoman Brown stated that was epecifical ly requested by the City of Ontario, because since they were asking for full representation by the cities, they felt there should also be full representation by the County. Mayor Stout stated the agenda soya they era adopting the eoar4 of Superviaor'a proposal ee of Pebruary 14, 1990. Hs asked if that hoe bean emended becnuee he had read in the newspaper on February 16 that they were at 111 talking about ^-ha-^.gi.^.g it• P.a Stated he had 22C2ived a call frrvn Mwyn_* H,w..n cn finer ..s Ontario Lolling him not to adopt the Aeaolution yet because they were still working on soma differences with the County. Councilwomen Brawn stated the Board recommendation on the 14th was to allow twenty-two titles, the Division of the House rule, and the tan people on the private/profeasional aide. She stated that whnt Mayor Snider was concerned about was the criteria for appointing the Chair and Vice-Chair. City Council Minutae February 21, 1990 Page 16 Mayor Stout asked if that was part of the February 12 Resolution because he did not want to peso iris Resolution tonight and then find out the County hoe changed rtie. ,...c.,.,..._r„ Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated that according to the newspaper article on February 17 there were three outstanding iesuea, one being the rotation of the Chair, the second being sure that the cities had alternates, and U:e ~,?:i_~ ..__ _. eluding cis pr ivataj prei eueiwuai side. ne ecacnd ci~ac in discussions .wish other cities today, it was determined that Harry Maye frao the County was going to be discussing these iesuea, but there wne nothing finalized at this time. Councilwoman Wright asked Mr. Fulwood if he had gotten that information from the Daily Remrt. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated some o£ the information was from the newspaper, but he hoe also spoken with John Holmes, City Manager of the City of Redlands, who hoe been in contact with the County, as well ae with a number of other people. He stated they felt there are some variables to be worked on and that noshing was in writ lag. Mayor Stout stated ha spoke with Hayoz Snider on February 20 who told him that it looked like the iaeuee were going to be worked out, that everyone was egreeab le, but that he has c.,i mat wit Y. Suparviaox Jon Hikele on these iesuea yet. He felt that if Councilwoman Brown was set ief ied with the Resolution ae it ie now written, he did not have any problems with it, but felt that they should wait until the County does or dose mt acnnnr ~r nos..~e .~,.. a ___ __, Councilman Baguet asked what would be lost by the two week time period if they were to continue thin to the next meeting. Councilwoman Brown stated that until 518 of the population of Cha cities approve the A8 939 Task Forces, the County risks n fine of $10,000.00 per day after March 1, 3990. Councilman 8uquet stated he felt there were still things to be worked out and was not comfortable with the idea of approving the Resolution when they were not sure what was transpiring. ' Councilwoman Brown stated they should keep in mintl that there are three Leeuea that Mayor Snider hoe a problem with, bus the rest of the cities in San 9ernar3l.^.c C,,..niy dG act ::acasdariiy hate any nrnnl ems. Mayor Stout stated he was concerned that they were adopting a Resolution In support of whet the Board of Supervisors hoe done when they were not even aura whet has been decided upon. Councilwomen Brown stated she hoe spoken with Supervleor Mikele sad the important iesuea are covered in the Raeolution before the Council tonight, and if the other Seause needed to be in writing, Choy could amend the Resolution et that time. City Couneil Ninutee February 21, 1990 Pages 17 Councilman Alexander stated he would like to ceeolve this issue before the first of March. Councilwoman Wright stated she did not like the newspaper's representation about this issue, that the cities were being territorial. She did not see it ae being territorial at all. She felt the newspaper was being shortsighted in not recognizing it was a philoeophicel issue about whether or not the private sector was going to be deciding money issues in Lhe County or whether it would be public of ficiale. She felt they were miaeing the point totally and that they should be sensitive to those ieauee that are being done to protect the public's good. RESOLUTION NO. 90-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING lt8MB8RSHIP OP A SOLID WASTE TASR FORCE REQUIRED UNDER A.B• 939 AS APPROVED SY THE SAN BERNARD INO COUNTY BOARD OB SUPERVISORS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to approve Ae6olut ion No. 90-094. Motion carried unanimously, 5-D. • f R • t J. IDENTIPICATIOR OP ITEMS POR REST M66TIN(i .Tl l~nnnn~l~n~n 4 eY ..A 4r __ _ _ regarding pool and spa safety covers wLth the Council, oat only-for the .safety aspect, but also as a water conservation measure, and receive a report regarding what other cities are doing, but stated it did not need to be on an agenda at this time. J2. Councilwoman Brown asked for a report on Moreno Valley•e Youth court program and stated this item did not need to be on an agenda at this time. R t R R R R R• COMMVNICATIONB TROY TR6 PUBLIC A1. Fred Boyd, 6550 Etiwanda Avenue, inquired about any development plane for the property on the southeast corner of Etlwenda and Highland Avenues and the h0 ___ +ar ated _.. !t. Mayor Stout stated he hoe heard that the owner of the property would like [o develop a protect, in which case the house would Da removed, but ho did not believe the owner hoe moved into the process at this time. Bred Buller, Clty planner, stated they hove not had an application on Chat property yet. City Council Minutae February Z1, 199D Paqe 18 Mr. Boyd stated he fell there were a lot of code violations happening at the residence. Mayor Stout atlvised Mr. Aoyd ihaL he could work with Code Enforcement on any proDleme Lhey era experiencing with code violations, and suggested he contact Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, about it. Jack Lam, City Manager, atatetl they would also have the Sheriffs Department ioox iota any po9eioie violations. • • • • x MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by euluet to adjourn to an Axecutive Seeeion to discuss the Rock Crusher litigation. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. The meeting adjourned at 9:17 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: ~ N V~\ 00 Lf u •• •• Y ~ V• f R • 611 II F11 •a• ~n N• N• O' Z11 11 >• ¢• x •pi• GYM ~¢• •~~ I• o O O O O 0 O G O OOOOOOpNOOn00 ONOOOPNpOMOnOOV O O O OOOOOhM000000 OPOOONNOONO N•I00 c h ooooe~i w.ieeee riceu.•. •~eee~ "• Y M d ~ r•ONOOTNOONh •• •• N N N • • INInNhhlhilf NONN NI>I• N 11N ± ~. nwa N w n A n A N M P n P A n n n n A P n ill w~w~wNw Awwwwwwwwwwwww JNI. OVnONny~pP000mNNV<OOPPOOGOOOOOOOrrN•I.I M•b•N=MNNNNaNNNN O APPOON NIn TIInNfMhhyy~»0000> 000000 s O 0000 ~POOOOrrrrr r••M MN•• .• NrwrMM w•.1N rrNM•~•0•r •0••OIrNNrNMrN OTN II11111•11111111f 1111•11111111'IIVIf 11V1.11V11111111 1 I 1 1 I O 1 1 1 1¢ 1 0 1 O I > 0 J O 2¢ Jr T1. •Jh N P hNY n•> N MN N V=0f000 ^7M P O 0 NOOWIN 7 Nh M • fOJ ZTOI •OaN T d n O••NW W JM000 N taN Zr¢ •oIWPrO O Ow N w 1 FJM O fe•j JJnPw W •N IN wYTiT•• •„ISIJ1 IAININI~ P YY 1\1 i JSNO=a ~ J V W\OJWpOSfnr u N O Of 0 e H U e0V WI\ONr ¢<N VY ~ O O > ~ Il `NOJJJOa \\ _ „W O_W_Oa N ZVeV N iV V y y VOVW \1• NNV ¢ F ~ >v6VNVYVfVWVZV NV VO WNOFJJIMr 2 VO Yff • yV 1 MV„VZVVVSVMV > V J =F1 JOWWVN w= Y>il0 V Y • JVJ W1.• MF YWF» ¢ \YI OOO ~ 6 a F yVf 9WJWN f~V~ L• i WN J YJOPP< Z f YJ•JSFaa h IOW 'OWWa\\F O F P J J 0 V<F{¢~j ZtN6a O aJ JNMJ I i 0• J _N f__N WOSFOV<$Z i WWO NIOJ\\f 6 N J> 1 > y. J CFfai\O O YZ i ZiTN o V W; P i~ ` O\O NJOW W_VVV 2 S O•a r ~+ P > t_ •O •pOMYl06 !JS FFIM 70\O M f O 1 O 1 hw OOl WJI~WW J NNW OZL W 1 tOieZ F Y¢ WI¢ W WWV W O y¢ J O W Z1N 1`J wwOFMhOY 1 a OSO<aVyaj F • 6 Y V IL bV ••f OWw YOJZS F O••Z> > U y IIZI WO Ot6 aOZLL¢ J~VfZ>aPZYhMNNN ¢ V O O 1- W _O__VO W W ZWfJgO w u r a N ` f > GOO Y:tWa i•• MWwyyNO J U 1 i iiiOMYVUOwo •Z W¢~Ot G V W G { INJJJFWNG6 LMf Of JOaVahV¢¢2 a w N 2 SIOwwW ¢ JO 'J Fiwy » • O F Iv Z 2 C LL NNNNG•.Y YMNJ>G OGP<ZFN>¢I.O MSON o < ~~~~opoepzwil ePSaeW<~NJZpY\ 6 a N Y> O i> O V Y ZZ Z••M6WW tp•If {OOS VVNVfw J S 1- O V N U N F N o u U I G N i 2 I Y > F ~ J II J Z N i J O II J f h 11 2 N f 1+ O 0 J ^ > t y II II i Z W O 7 II 11 N ~ •• F „ h ~ • J W 11 • t a O U D N 11 • W •[ yy ¢ V % W II V N O~> I i• • i r f o ~. i i i s e u o o f o ~« iY ~O 0 :W :> V h FI a NR wM• e hew Y ~Ni N NN __J YS¢ ZY ¢P• Y( W WWYW•tJJOViVN¢ V O OOVVtltlYhWO W • ffrffuYJY of 9 • •710YV2 \Y Sh hNiW Yt a F ooiiiM•hif eiaU J N NMJJVZYfiiVVM W O a 1 F Z JU S w NJNY N•• N ¢ MOp O• O 006E O f NN iY i Np3 Np<2 i I~IV WFVYF 9 ~ iz>•i• ?uueiw< i FY<MMNJfZW> iZW i~~•• Wf<YhY J NZaNNY~Y OM><W WVffVYNwNhVOO V'.i ~6G\NOfYYGW~W1Wi1 yF hi~tfWO„t1w>iMhi iVYYU~Zi:~~JJ YNY )! Oyhy JMJ wSYiY0000M0<ZYY F>WWWZiNNNJiiiN VJaZiONNNOf<lfl «f f «<«ra Yl<l w O h M IPIr NNIP•I IP•1N •Ni •NI •h.1h M010 ~YPPTry~ryr~OPOhT T p D •1 O N OOTTMnM•IO OOFN PO• ON PIIIY O••111 M T 111 T T •• T ~~ TTTTT •• N M •y 111N 'NeaNm^eomeePfpometlPaoNphmeeNeNOamw oe•ePwweeemrephooo rya01.1POmPtiOPmrNmOhmNONT :OPNNmOM000 :m OOr00 nr.wi uMif nwnnPhra~OhPeDamNw~~0Yr0•_ OaOMOMNOwIm OwOhN OmOmTm Ymm -~~N"~ TNwNr PNrr aNNmP O N P r 'w '~ '~ f R N nN n ~ e wIM hw T N N O_ ~N\ VON =ie Yoo OVa Y LL V i •2• '_: ~6 ~M: iu• N• I~IOY •i• •W• IIN~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w M "i •< ti 6 JPOnNNfNahOPONNNrNahe+NNNNYri N'NhO OMNNrNtlhiPOwNmrNahOP Nseewlm eeeeeoim Oren•° P N NNNaeOOaeaaame:oee""'hl-h m rmmm y.<~Nn n.m+n..nnNnnnnNnmnn.<i.~~mmnnnm~.mw.°1.°. .°.~JN...PIn°n ~.m~~nnnN...innJN Orrrrrrrr11r11rrrrrrr•rVrrrlrlfrr•rrlr• • •rrrrrrrrf y 00 O <O •LL< < LL• O W OW W U W p T r ¢ MWM V ~ O °O Z R O ~ R O Pp0 N~ \ r Ni tRN „ ao ~ eLL a i m c wi ~[ < SON •e ~ OP < •N W OTW N o s• NO O• ~ wWwNO i WN =J F 0 ~ OPM J _V ¢ r N¢ i0<r ¢W wNWwIr VW WN Op NZ < h ~ pJFh NRV20¢u MU w0 WO a j1A N J i O OW JNJWr > JY 6~ NF KWS mAOV W~_.W yMF •LL _O ~ tLL O VV O u'M6 VNf :~`6 iN nTN=6HNN p_O LL OW tS Wi<W' • ¢ ¢h2J • NV N N• Fy NLLMNIWI¢ W <LL¢h MOW FV20 = 'W OLL<LLIUN LLZ h X N WWi JMWZ ! ~piOn O ~ a= 2J J2NVSU2R O°Yp W J~LL °WW6 NJt> VwWUW MLL •ONWONVN NM N Opp N NnNJVNWhnrW} w NnJJnOn! WNN t\ZVIN Zw JVO 2W~w060NVSJN¢NJ L 9h FONO w_WMJm O _pR IVZJ O JZSwmNN _ Vm ¢ m~uU~N ¢ 2 O F 2NmYYJY~ JI V VNWO~LLnQ~r<!i+ w6 V YNiZruP p J}¢OhJN1.hn7VLL< aio¢CGOnNZ W!a! MpWW< :~M JI= UOWYN< NULLO! LLwJ00 2SSNWMLL=Uh ipGMLLW p¢F_>In}hw°_V_p V09NZWMILLYJ2WSZ°I OI N~JaLLLL~OVJ hn¢N¢NO¢i w RSItLLUVmVW1: e w w0 LLLLm»NnLL ae¢twMww Gy n0 u wjWwnNWVR >WM wWWwlr i<p1> Offw 2}6 O¢NLL¢<M>i¢°LLLL..a¢hZ<¢¢¢emO~IONNOLLOJO}UIOWh'm VfNV¢ i ~ i N V LLNn Z < J« HU J < V O >_ !nN in U < 6 INi N YN f \ N < ~ < t N UCN~ WN W U N i y ~ i riii<LL N° y vo ~' _ _ n w op .. ° iiz .. w ~ .. .._ Juu ¢! w vi ° RNN .iip u WW i u° >FO LLLLN°YNS OWW Y_Y WV V RLL ¢OZNOf •~OW N_O NC°UYOWY JZYJ i 60 i N< <MNrN! V LL < Z ~ W WNOm :00 ih¢Z~m Z~W <Y 'VLLO wF• W1N6 i0<Y00 Jul-ihW VV ZUVF<Y SM 1tw jiy M i FFVWiNLLOY<M~w°WNLLVViVyOY<¢ ,,1f WNCQNN~JOYO w<V°XJ JYO NOOUWMOMVNO«Ww« 1 iLLVOW~ ~Ni N hlLL 1[FMLLU iM>J 00lVOOLLN~ VJO Yt~V YU~W WN i O OSJZ< JVN¢n •MJ<W <09 N JN ON>w Z • !u~ NSSO N1.IyMZ w<JM Jnn100W •JO ~~~0l~•VJOiOpOf pW0 « J 02ni2 wtFY W<j tLL il>LLLLRYw10MYiiWtRY}N OVM<ZWyNnhFn<iMWNyWw wi O OOnnYMnYVZ<NZO« JJVO<V Wnni2WNNN¢hF>OW Y¢Pwj NOJ}7JJJJ JtMMyiJ'JUUJ}Vni>WJFrUVNVnZmO00i0<JSWyYO>JR 000lODUUUUUyVyyUVVUUVO00000000pWWWiLLLLLLLLLLLLVVVNiiiiii POaPPN NIIOryOTNhaNNNNPNPNOnNrhPPPNPPNf hNrtlNNNOPn00<Pr NPOOPOOnnOaMPOPNMOP=T PrNOOMNONhONNNOOPONNOMOhNMNP<90 IRNPOOPnn hTmwNN w°INnNNMNJHNANVNNnTmhnNMNnAON1MmN pT IIIN TT :6 IN Ohl•ION••o pNObOONOwN1 •hioF PyOi IlO 000+Q N••NOONOPmYhi Of00 NQUb1N ^^`phN^OWN\OONO~I U1N m/IO wmP00prmwne~PreN^~n mu~r NPhmNOIdP1rN••dN nNN ryN Nd ~NNdN wmNN M 10 m ••h •'• m •.I i•1 ••1 1 m w n N `Np F= ~fN VttN Ofo U~•~ VOe pH¢ J • ~ • +ii '_• • I • • Ma• XO •_OM ~ • w F :>. T•nmhmPOwNNfNmwmPO••Nm\NmhmP Or+N m.INOwePOiyNNVNNFmPO mPPPPPPPPmP00000opOOO nw•J ••N r••r ••n•~•NNNPPNnNNPm m~eeeemePPP~PPPPy~aj~POPPP P OIfIfV\f1\I~IIIf1\f\f\.IIf I~11lIIf11111\\IJ111•\1'IV VV• tl V m fVmm• m m m• O VLLO Vw N > ~ i NP ~P= ~ O F P h • NZ Jm 6 YH O UO •O \ •S NI>JV a0• Z N U•+r VIN OV t \ 1 ••SMth iNnmN NO• 2 ¢W LL i\ JO FOU W_I.1 •~MN 2 >W NZ n W m WN W VS • Wm°NO 1n\= Z61S22 OLLJ ° WVYON P fZ u m;NS O OI V V\ i•• LSw•T •m mm W p + w T Fr•hOF •ZJJ oMZa w ur _6 NM O 2 =1• > LN NN••WW 06 6NSIUW N J JUt? i OSWOTi JLLJN JWr•SJJ aJ N SLN Y t: O+Nt MWO¢6J fJNM U LL ZOV >•• m •ILL IOWO •atlUMO~f• WJ •¢WNSS 7 LLIiN WN 4rNJ•P•f2 M Jr pr2 Nu ni~uFr •Iw NOVZ6iL OOYN JSY iFas OJ:La N • V ^ OtY NLL •P •• u r INO=N~~ LLVpIJa JV f ONUr w jLL wflV LLs 2 LLa;• CNLL wywwr aOw WOS U7 7r000 NwZrO>6UWZi000 OSrZW ~ N tQ~l UI aY i O UWWh oVa60 a6W Jf_1W •iw +ri m~LLrrFUWSZONZWNWWI~ ZIZ aSUFF¢Nt 2NWan2wN UM wV F¢NrN NYOd6FVif>O tiNNtpZIO2VYONJtVN1L0 UVYGa2>aOw FI>Fa21 h0¢aWJJOFa>Y UOJaF WJ FNaOSatN200 •SO tGZf JafFt uV~220 O ¢J 2i 002i GUOFNt22L~0 MVt tOYrMwrywH aLL'J FLL¢ Ni2N0 aiJ YL rZG2V¢Z20< NUriLLWZwOiWNarwZNNVSZUWWOJOUN\VwwJ Ow<UOmtwm w `N-J>Z ONUU~}yNf UOtWVIiClZ6••V¢ JauO>Om6SR VOtLLLL UanNm~~OLL _ ¢ JJS u u i z z " i N ~ 0 1= •z .. N w uw Y " ~ i.'. O Oo >INwW OvV N O ;~ ya LVZ2__ ONZ WO n LNwUU •~N •^iW • nJ 'JO NJ ~7^ Y u; Diy y N w0 ZONy6 f N Wt oX 00 O ¢LL JZVNNam _ tlZ J ~ Z NV Or >2uwZ a NWNww WO`ZOO V OOSNStOOF NM WLL V>JaN f2Z••i0 JJ Oi OS LLW•+•W22FNVW0 00 OIa 0~1wONNttU t1 ZrNNwu ZN tiW M09••SJ t WOLL tRY•• VVVN• NVUNJIwo hWW•(JMVSOa N•aZ MW Vaa;J>„OUN>tajw SJ wOw2tl R» NJNGNI\OMFN9R ON ¢••6 Vft N+Z;O O oLLLLR JI>Off>J YJ<t O W i W7°t 9 ZNV KaJx s0 JxN OOZFIVV22Zr •J GOO F~t10¢JOOJ°x•>i2 S¢rROOJtZO• ;Ywww LL • >ZWn •• SSNZWJOYwJe00N is°u °o ~aixi.W.xiwugNSH333•N•~i`:•i•.i•~=°+~PPY Sa~"~.°•°N ietlitlii:iii°r•°• Y.OfOOVJJrNOZR2tOUatlVVZrYO¢a Ywm000mr » OJNI WVYJLLMO iXw•ZiuMHy w•°1•aj17~(•i[•x[•O(~JJJJJJiItLfiLtiYiZ2220o000pRL~OPL PPOw\O~ONPn••OnMNNNOOmMnm°dOPmNdPPN.•PPNNPNJOnIT OMPNPI+ NINP NPPTNNwNPwN~MTNNPN\m Nm MITTNPryT „PN~mNNNO N •• Tw N mA •1 mmTnNmr• mm T /rN 3 aNtlOON M1Nm0000mNOmO0000a00w• OOOOPNN•.NmOa^1+mrN t~ OpPrawNNOOpPONOP00000mO0Y1PONOOrOONJ•r mN Y •!Y _ OpM1aONaONOepmnOwramOON^OTPOPf- TN44maFahNNa {aa wc_~..mmNrrNe•r N NahoNmN+ hP•rPa Nr NFrgN N..N+ Na • N a N .. • \Y¢~ n N n w P w rY O• ZY P ° JMNPaNi1.OPONNMfNOhOPOyNM+NaNmP O..Nm•NaMmPOnNn•NaM1O i zi nNmPNnNm•P+ ra+p~•NNNNNaNNNaaoatlaaaaaaPraaaa•. h.. ¢ PPPPaPPagP P ywi.P..Piw.°.wy.P+w.P.yywrN rr..ywyyNrryrw.gi .PY r e ~n o iaiii+i+iiiiiiii+aaa+a+a++++++raa+++f+a++arf+arr iii U .. . .m .m m ..• . . N a T Z Z ntl U w P N m 1 JY aLL • O • Fy r a A i m l • i LL°m .. it . . o • O . w r N ¢O u h . nVN . NN< Nw \ _ _ . . } J _ N ZiJNi+ W.L SLL Y O h iNP MNJ _ ..ai VOV V M.th Z ¢ V ° ~ _ _ V>r.VYN y¢w LL rIF Z yWJOJ WJiJJWJOi W• J .J J Y iWPm •Y • rS)¢ •rVi .jif O u • i NNf<W\i h WN VN SOT=»t J¢OOpWPJOO wIOwr p =m NJ u J » O ~ uu °O M'J 1¢h itL~ i » 2 ¢jOrNLL< <IOWO\LLIlJ6FLLLLrOONN¢ Y.NY. 61L N'J ~wNJZipZOOPt F S¢M• NJOONW °VOPO LLHW HY _ OOW~WF~ y100 IOL PW¢ph¢22¢ V ¢ wrW h¢uWW mrVh t q •.P J Vm>W2WSShr OiZiYiUZ wUV 2yZ W •Kw22>M022 uZ10 mPNOw< OV000 Wm021 w J N ¢ O O w1Yl it iN.. J pZ O<_M1_JP _t<yYNNN ..am2M > \¢ LLOYFrPW<+F..Ny00fQ>Sr2YW>OJ32N rJN LL u OM Y OWii•'.<Z<1m •p.. W <rOYm fWfV<wf°<OVWwONOmO! w260PU¢NaNtlLLJWP2'J PMP<¢ NI-Sp a C W __ IF n~nl~1¢J 2¢Z¢W¢O! JCO¢ M M VOw<W..W JwN¢yy¢<LLWPW WiWWZpw422MV WLLZ2VV Wis >orr wo worJr<>yamp« mJWa ~ o ¢ ° > N¢spnipuop~ aa inz¢p¢~>¢sr~° a ¢upwptocpaoi:hP¢e, . e w zz Y Y JJ Z O « Y J S i .O ~ • ~ on Nx nV ~ O O VN ¢tf Z J 6 LL O V U O SSMOV 2 u V • ZZF UUN r M uh• „J Z i/N O IIWWSF r 2 • iu Ns oP~ <r Iii .oW Yii iiz~ °y. ~i Y n ww:i ¢p LLO~wJ ~i zzz wr ri.LL.LLZ r i yo Ni° r W i= z w : uu e wu yJS)JOwr JWa z J i JA i i ¢o y¢r U II Y II 11 SR •.NVW..WpUJNww¢>WOwmafMOO yyI y¢V rW1~wi Wp0 MOJpOZf> O >iLLLL l¢OiiWW• NU Yj11u1 p r01¢w¢CWO WwJO•.y0°J¢ V¢fW LL ~M •O yW W6ZSJ¢M Y Y W iNM tObOJV00 UJJWJW• iFYwH iFiiV n f.t <h> OV W 6 P V I I Y ¢iN° OOIV JNNriOOY •OrLLW• J<WWJJO)MNS¢N R20tr N Y Y d P yy11~ MUW OW Ytf P'UVpoi <NNNf<VZZ VY[tly02..Wf fWWNiN Ri ° VU ~ i PO J I4ib•. •.ZP» OOLLLLS¢ZZwpMM .77ff mJiV6¢¢NNRNJp6 6f 11 ~SY ¢'Jf <a~W W... ..i>.! «fyuW22Z Op000¢P'J J~Jw W'JfYVmW000QW PPpO¢Y ¢¢ii •NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNhhM}))ifiiiiMN Y¢11 NaNtlPNyONraNgNP+ry Niv1 I.PNOmNNN P Nma..a ANhTTa+gOaPO IIOY ~ waPaN•Y00•.h....NhmNOOhrNOgNPN wPNOhyNpa°a0•. ..q PN Dy IIOY •ill ~ mMOi.10MTryTTM100TMn1N01•I nlNaanTn NYT NnIIwNana~NY1 Nm T NN•...T TnmNN~.1TT NnNTw rrn Y1 NyTwN N~rln > , I • Y Y ` '`/~ 1 _ 1 1 1 1 1 o N oo\epeDee NaoemPNOmmoeofoedTOmeeooedood •hL• N N pONMOhOOem mV000rnM ONPN00000mdON10000A00m \F oOdOVOTONNN NOONmOPONNN0000NmOVTdmOONOdNO N O YN NANO m dnP»OIN O N\\MnNNNP~n\NNn^ \ d n w nnNd\ d m •\ O n n N N N F• p n 2 • • /~ I• A ire n q n Nwwwwwwrwss• /• •O• Jdh O OnN T .IN OP O.4NT\NdhOP ••N T\NdNmwO»MT1NdhOPOnNTdNdhOPp •S• mN P hhOOmOm0000m PPONPPPPaPPP PPPPPPPPP1e00000000nnnnnnnnnnN OPPPPPaaP0000000000000000e0000 NNNNNNNnNNNNNNrvNNNNNN 6. •t• OTI .• •1\\\ VI \1r\\\\\IId\ \11\f\\f\\\\\\\d\\\\f\\\V1.1\\\ Y7• V I I I I. 1 L PU L Im L p L II i h U n YT A TS i i \K t PN C V LL S w I PN • O J6 Us uU V iUV rwP wim O p V•[• VP of V¢ U O O\O ffh U¢ WN W W UWW W i isw L L S\ OY »o eeee eo S II v b ry VUVN N VP VN {fH NMh VOhi VN N SM ~=MOei2 •Wn VS fh YO rh\ ~ V O SVn V L Vf LSI Z a P JC : YMfh VU 6• N w w y•1N V S Ulm ~J9 \ • P > ~ Y O •Uh L Y W J J JO 0? O NZ 100 J hN¢0 6 • \ i 1 h i w i Uh 7 P J f N0 N Nh{NN F1 VUww Y i sf J1YW w o • d _ Lhe O_ r2W ¢ M if Jii i i iiN U •2 r W iT 2JF O w O O h> ¢VVh V VOOVVO 2 _ O • O • U N •[ : b i Z O •. O • j 0LL»T i U N • O O M UNw 2n hi P67mhU W LLNW 1 O O i 0 SIj=T iNW LL=WVVf =M=00VUV W iiJwL Si2M h» » J Oho < O N \ SS ~ IN f W i 6 NNNY W WWO O¢6 66006 ObbUJ662iY h w O 9N > Ga W y Z 'SN W W0W» WW»•JW Y LL V 1 6 :\' N 0U NO r{N Y V i >iw h WN Nw W_www>W¢h •K¢rNW O»J YmK1W Y i N V 2 i h? Y jN ~»OLWVNrJ WW H WhwWY»W¢W 2 WhF¢ O V W _ _ u 1U1ry •1 •'i •' N oYZ NZ¢h 1 <hwWMW 006D2 iVZ¢W0 Wo0M2¢J W6 6N;•6 »¢o oo»oaou6 oN»rz > U U Q Jm¢¢w{ODW NJ U.IGU¢VUSC W¢ wLL¢ffwJwVfUU¢r ufU Sf00 O¢r0¢OYWp>60N6NN6WN6 NfWNNiSOU NS VN I U N u«•a L J • W f p S• l iwMW MVf Ow•[ ShW i J J h Nr 2 J i ¢ OJ I J _ ~ c N 1 F S U S w W WI4{ \• W SL 0 Z » Z yu?u f • O N S •2• ¢W¢ 6V W 00 J O i WLO F • • • ` N 1 1 V WWO J •t { Wf _ 1 P NN N»M { N• l Y O Y ON hM¢Lh > Hh fU M JI • • N Y YOM ;„ _ _ P WVOiY UO O YtMJVJfM • • F K O J : J W V J b MW ifJi J~•O yiYM wY ih{0 `Of LV DiJMY16L V¢UW e2ii0{ ¢60 SOWLLWN• • s t ¢ i > OSWWN2 Vh WM YVh2¢»Yh t¢LLhMLYL V L L ~ F O U 6 h O Vf ~VMALY• 6»i bh• OI 4LW I NJOO NOhJONOfWLLiiWfW Nf OMYrLLiWWhYi'• t iY rLWNhY• 0!N • • V 2 bLY JMDO •f0 _ J WY•WO_aiMNOU . O f t ~NZM V~t • : h Y Y 0 ¢ ! OdY0Y12 • Y hV N > rL00 •N2N Y •h • N W• O W• .1 J O N • W •1p1 fWpW r W fhV 'J JVN Wf6W1}~ Y OfWJNwhfOWi! y •LLL SSDWOOi JWhii LYfNWf~ NN /i• O O S O „ VYMN2 JNfW W » » Y:LLLVOLNY•VMNhLY N r UJNDONJJJ II • 0 O f Y rV»OOW9OVJ Y. 1 iY0N 0f JOpOYY9f •f ~ II!• S 0 1 F i b Nhf>UNpblN• h{f1 flefffOp0000000000000VVV 1 F 1p11 h P O w \ OP\hnnOdOPN m»mNVO\PdNMO\TdhPOOhNNOhNN••hN 10• d \ P d n NNwpdNOmPUN d p\dNrynryOd\OmOdNTOdM1ONPdNfO• H N n d m T d T \~T\ A \w M y yM Nh •S• • ~ r • T I •I T n Nm T TN n.1 »n•4 T NT T > • ~ d F VY OOOTOhOO00NpppNOwmNNOPOhNPmOONO00pOOp000• Y>F /_YSY OOOPOOOT/OOwTTOw0000hPOnlrNwmPPPONOPINOVhO000PON001 •~• •• •• • •Y~ f~OOT<IN~ mY ~~G=NS. ~ a a 101NN NPN Na wH OwmTw•hOm NN0 T1110 Nhw~Of M N wVw ~> Tw N T Nhh T w m w \Ya N0 ry I 1 N +1 J ~ ~ • ~ ¢FOY m•NO mPOwNTINVFOPO•YNT•NOhOPOwNT.IN Oh pPOwNT<N 01-O POw 112Y mTTnI1TTmTFl111I• «IIINNNNNNNnNN0000 mmOhh OOOOOOpo00000e000000000000000000000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 01••V111111••<11•111•1•<111•11111<1.1• « •11•1« •<•<11 II Y • < /f• / f Z fJ U ¢ • 2 ¢O ~ ~ __ _ _ U ~Z N w2 OL M 1 V P Z L N P/J m YV 6V P TN w NVVlW U_ LrJ 07 Y P / •n<W<W W n00 IN< •f < OC f VN • LLL • y __ y~Y • 1/i OtOV~ i ~W LL ~ W iw 00 r• ~• y p N w0 M N OY OZV ~ _ O 9 W w WMwN NiZ J LLh WO P NW IhO Ow• WOi ~ wMJ _VU N~V 9_ wN n¢yNNWO OS> O r\ U V w .pJ6 T F\ Y + y W W N• f2WIZ JnW CW >a>VIU Sw< •ii2 V< ¢Vr6`O O V VV¢V>~NV nV k ¢ n uzm Y irie Nn f o Ww<NSNnnrY e . . n \NY\¢ VV> J JJNN ¢WJ OOf Oi J U¢\ tlN< N TN N wWM~N yY0 f OLM NNiNiN ¢ N NMT W V>MV h~NNf OfPwNZ:/NI S N: N~wN O N: O O• N w V iiYUp ~< H < ~ w H2• V pVVFOWb01 /brN O'YfUWO 6\V JV WSVWILNWwiNNC f2VW N<V Z\ W ¢ VZww illP m ZO WiCWLL< fY-LLNO O OhV~K 02>¢6f0 wN2>NhL hVN 04r0 IN Gh f O O N¢ _ _ Nf~W V VWOT~ U VV OV O N ~ WJFN U hZ4hZWr>Z N2 W NMM Nw S¢SMWZYLLM rZM) LL N L¢f wfY OJ SiZiUUO¢Zww ~NNN~pe ~N SwU2NM F i p J C wwGZW • ¢i V LLUmLVN¢Y„LLOOWW W U W6 N u i 0 I wpZwfihW Oww wtiJ¢W NZWW IhZw h U O ¢Z whWZ WWWSffi WUVW YPVYW>V LL u U nUf VYPP YW N'wONVJ YN ffYOR WPOmw mSOU w~>ppr w w O P u2> r~¢¢¢ _ 02¢VW 7WwNi wLLNhH ¢N~J LY¢SO 2 t SOIIMOLJNLLJJLtm Or~LLr¢ W/LLJ6NWOOJNZOSi1 W0LL WS OVpPwUOW<WWNwJrtY2LLW/))M YUUWWOUwWw O w NOm000NZOUNmPnNV¢O¢sL>CNi~JOJNOOLL¢SLL ONN/OVNOOI-VON U U Z Z V v '1 J w Z h V NL SU NV o'..wi ~ w .3" z .i. a N p ••hJ Z OJ ~ ~ OU N r O Y ilw~) w< M 2 ry i Sh i V W < N Y w WmFV Y O:hi2 N N ~ i ZZFp V f O 20 J OV U W L NWN~ i• OU ¢ G 2 9 Oh ~ • i LLOW ZJC ii YhIIG/ON~¢ i0 UF6NC Zi hWNh fryw ~~L M1YiWNO¢O 00 VWONNVW<6 fiVMlnO MO¢J Ni N YUJJY Y ~ UC2JVUMJh VY>N6 N ` r<Z~VyO NfYYNWM ZZWNW >iOOJ f ~ Y Y <~uNf >f `WVN<SY w JhM U « 1~:OOV i WOJNf bl. /ff F. •Zff iw w Jb NN <LL ilia, YU N6 i N !• Z> JVi WUV OZZ W~/ • ¢WWJf •W JM f pM W / >WWZ JSS •LVOO)~~ 2 ZNZVNVMVL<•ON ••Y•W WJh >NY W II OYW y¢•jfJ OOfO SN SON OWf 2Z !>OI•f <f U L J twZiYJ ~WIYI pp y wWILLIZY>V~fNlf~JwY>0;6NWYUVYFh2LNN •h tW]~lYUW•NIWpOVVIWLN ~O r •Z• _ J¢f hlF VVJ6tlJ> W!6¢M/VNNMV6¢ZZ/JIL/¢rJ20>WWU YZY <S S'+YJOO¢¢O»J f WWWWWWVMf JZY wOp00 ffY000¢hffWWW VVVUUVVVVVVUUUVOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWLLLLWLLUUUVVVVVVVSSZZZ Y Y Y Y •OY w1~NrNN/N•POOhOTNmNNOmOONhN•>N TwOPnPnT~d O.Nj~pjA1hr110jIT OmO NwM nHOTy N n• wmnw N mNNn P P II ZY i wry T Tm w w w n Tnw m ~ .l • IT • NTH Y Y>^ (~ C T S x • OONNOOO00m00 ONOOOOmNNO ~ ~ NOOOOOONPNONOmNOeONOPO0000 10NO0a ":' o~me•~~nre owN ° n \x TNU .P NN g m m a N ~ • • lrf NN Naa e m•r i . i• N N MYa A M y r l mx .. •N .. r rr <x J ~ n r• ; ~~ LL YOX J POrNx1•NmrmPO~NN•NanmPOwNw1•NarmPOw•N wl•NaFmPO~N xzx nremmm mmgwPwwwPwPPPmooooe0oeerr.. ... .. .. ,. ..rNNN N:NN±rvN~±:NN•°a °iNNNHNnNNry~NHNtiNN tirvnry >NNNNNNNN°N I 01••••VV• • •• •V •f•V•V••••••• ••••••V•V•V••V•••V f X ~ ~• X ~ x _ V m mmm m m m m w F iW« ~i°° m~ i ~ ei z as z > •:::. aai Jz~wo ° Nr w r ~~i VwHa° m o i zz o\ `^ ! .°.ar woz • ° ~iwn ~a °e e } . . i N . s ~W>kN ° a Uw WF WW S q •• F OwVM w /IM ZNW I OOO f S ZNC • _ Or IUOOP Or W ti m WwJ N I wwwm •tiT Su LL fy\ r< VNO NV m O n 1- WV F ryN\w UU USq gry NSUN r W NN 6F J• 6 WO e[ m N>rm mry w W ZZ JW OFY N ~~ ZLpCii JWiN f•• .~JJV u yN x O NOUWM i«Mi0 FWwNYmW \ZC Z • N OOO < 0 • J OWWmrV1LWZW VyU • Ww rN: w•~ m •[O W~W •LL rw w2 N ZMZ:iUr >MJUfW Na>w i\LN NNM ~ == x 1JNJZV p2 SJN }JZ liO NOi 1iJWWW>WVY00•[J 06 ~ LLL U wju in OV:wN~NZ~w ~uwOZ Vx_'O~ V C •xF~w 7 ° ~ 7 07w a ILL I..m• WN W20LLOZr www _ lu VO N i MO Y~ L .r F f r YFwVwZOLL ~ YNO00 W N m ON n N O 6Cry<Y Z ~ Z ~NmuwiZ a n mO O N Vf ly F0 • i a• i nFw UF I I VV O w ° O " _ NO N U W2G<° 2W pl2f mw j=NNNUVW LL22 <U wVWN6NNNi26N0 L JM6mr OWw Uu Z < XN rZV FOn N FIN iF m=JJJ• w02 YF q O m F LL nY} NJw<Y Y iF uV l<JWLLmNeJUn¢M}ON faLL f1 WfJJ m N < y W O mW6ZiVFWVWFU••WWNZ•nm OOOJZmUF04 =mmm SOOrwn V\LLN }•[i OFFO2m FFnZ NKim wW OLrmwZ Y2r2ZZ NV6WrONWW4NrLLLLirCONNVw Upi>N < 4 <F NViU>L1 uCCZ24>S. iOJ~N mip GYOaOmINNNwYUmVmrOOi r f fJ NS FOMN U V 7i</ 2 OmZI m N < r ~ NLUrc 00 L Z 2 V w 1 u y _ - Z G i[< ~_ .i zu:.A .. N 7 JF Ze e2n WO O rJf • N S Jr •.U N O • JJO O y f< 6S WV W uJ V ~ V NN r< < V° " •sY i i JV OV J Y fV V mm Y•J WSmNiVifir00 mZWi r <iM1 m W m 1 m OFJnO F • ON„ Ow JW<~2rVri• f`w06 ° r IW O N ir f 1 ' Jf• NJ O O 66a iO\ O _ _ OO1L VFO> > » w OOOiN• F<M WS• OM OiOWm'2WWSW •• Nm •mfOV ~ M ' OOfO UJ r wO JO ONC6WmN f092<6 •Y• • pJWO• i2W 2 O 1'I x 2 Z y2iN t m i> W y iZrOV JwW« < J! O~ WWWSV fplO •F pOff• NV• iF •r LLW •OWNJmYNN •We •MNa a.[ • zzzpNp2upWCmNZSLL N FpwNplzaNZZ}zlJ:aa..ppNWSUWerrx•N UUVF°OW 'J « rNw2Y2m V O NNWUrV YVfOrUVi00J2YFmif2i xEx _ _ mmiJ9EN000VUOJJN°SmOmM NU2 OJ VSZJJFlOim 7'J• W w < W ww O eFF 1E 22000WZif of OJn w w ly ul ln000000m ___M O •_ V U U J _ x X _ _ __ __ _ _ _ MMrFIN r"1 'f •tYYJJJJJJJJJJJJ ! ! !!!!!!!!! x x ~m~ ONxla m mNrm aTMmNNammNN PP^ONPaa00mrmNN000tlNON•rPOM• xOx NTNNNNNPMNP• ±PrmOnOPP • PrNN•O•nVONONNrPNNNNNNI• r x°x m ~ rrOm~mNPrmNOT Tr1 •rmPT•NNIm^mAOMN ..N~Ma•..rq Pr "SX wr N N T NNnwnw N xl .•N n1 rr•r•N NN N^Ir " } " ~// 1 1 I 1 / VM waewoogpnomPPm NmnNmeeNNiq eeepeeeNNOOYOmoa v OIN hY00ia{g10YM0000NO000NOOgPOqPm in q~e w aN OYN Oaa10N On.• Y •• .yY nwm Y N wi ~ ~ LL NOYmPOMNniN gnOwNmlNahmPO nlNahmPOwNnVNOYOPO Nnnnnnnnn111•IIIIf NNNNN Naaaa0a0aaaYYYh •¢ NNNNN NNNNNNNNtiNNNN INNNNrvNNNNNHNNNNNryNMNNNNNNNryN •tl• OIIIIIIIIIIIIii11i11ii1i11111i111i 111i111Viii11V1111 X3X w21 • O S b\ Z V VN Y > O Y \wl i >+ a z Y na >LL w; Np w\m ~ LL+ Z 1 Y J Vin YI• Wq n _ ON¢ Lw VZ ¢ i\ Y PLLW { ~ ~ LL V WLL I \N N V > f \ VSO J U\ F VS Yl Sw• \OS YS w ••N i l MO M\1 SV w D V u LL il I J MN M fJ N f W WS 1 \frJ eWWOltWno m2N Yp e O+O ZN¢ ( NV N+Jn6 LLWY UUUw J\M m0 r i i ~n qp e ne•. ps Iw Wgs N¢•. W V Yy > V 2LL0 O• p W~{ ySJ I> O7 2 ¢t90}OW~ZiOLLD }~ qV6 l00 YO'Jw iLLwZpZYpW6w+wYLL1 OOP mJi w ~ S LL Nw IONNNWS•i(O O US\SJO I LL LL SeN'j NIWtlJ NIwtJ. Np¢NV+LLN jYw ~>{F+>W~YVY IL LLnJYFfWiWWV02W Sw v.Z VZ lnS UwV¢ 04 ¢OUY2ZZS JW\> YOVUSm DSO ~wSwSwY wJ¢m WiptlVOZf(WZSY2JZwKwR~R}rnnW}C6hLLOY U' VWZI¢>p7w•tl.~N LL LL Of J'/IS +IVN a[OJO+W¢OOIV JO O+O}2 f 4 ¢ u 2VwYwY+J Y'JC O20 NIO •{~w}tl }WY J2SU0•c2rcNYOtltlS~ OVO •}ViSMwN n NUONNwwNmw¢JJ wNNOYNU22¢••M JFOL w(ZY GS JOf ffwm0l} pWpm>tl2 wOpORI¢ LLOUNU4V ZVLLimi¢6CVZOZULOOSLLwZ¢OIOV••Y WmpUUUYJNZGwVmUU6N V u .i V Y N N LL p 2 < O U V ZO L JU t i W N VM >w UZ SFN S X JI ¢ N W W V Y NO O pp [ 2g2N J YNf W W ~FS MS ¢iu wVOZ ~ w w w a • a Miy V O V SY w U ONN NOJ Y G • hy~ O MW fN t p Y¢ tl O JOMwf Z JN •p6W ¢ • p O V •IL OVJU V U } • _ W Fi _ _ __ Fm YM l tW¢`W:VU O` wG iLLS~O N O ~ h O 11 ip •¢NpIW O JON J N(w i wFOMUJi.Itl N••O W VLLWV'JO?(}6 „N OWw NOwOY OONSLSNM O O tlyOwJ _ _ W JSOJ • p~J ~mUYN P6Z iWp S M O MOW LL • Z{ O tllOwl 6 J>S +IIVM JX VUVV OOI+{ VVI JUW>MwCVYY J1. i~i0+(VN'J 9J O Oli O SVLL• ¢vOW •UY• •i0~ OWw W••WUVU t J(OOSO QSZSOY •U• C 2 •UpY JO JpNO l••NOCV• {66WWfN J`M 0 N M (M YOWY}O<( (V OppJ 6•V NNN WWWWWFLLOY •LL J • •_• tl NORhWq`GW SO WO y>WF6LZLS+OI+N i¢JYYOOOOOwM~J}O}Wf wO ~'O <WSNS•[ Zf ( OJ O NWSmNwwWl _i'JFV•tOV V J X _ _ __ __ ___ S O[tlUYVVVM{W{LLhiiMMOpOJ7 LLODU•}»O}U : LZOWf•n 00 2tltlOW W••NO O ¢tl0 flllWM••NwN O•Il IIODUUYWZ(O •2 S t(SOOGp¢(LLLL\6p> 6LLC>L¢O¢¢6¢(¢6(Q¢64[6 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN • X 11 ~O X T ~ N I I InwO••OYOPONTdYNOnN{aPPnhgPP ~nI l Mh lCrNmhNe•nnwnYiiNNn •ill mnhnP„mNwNhnNN Nn rv a NNMnnwNmNniHNwn nNT MinilNw n w C • • ONOyio00P000mONVOO1r11 PEhy0lTOOm X=X q• • iNNryTOmNDOOmmOOPryNTrvOperyNOwOTiOOp ~~~rN~rNX~~Nw~r• •~XXX• ~~• •Nr~• i ~ ~.fn qqf of Of O>Sy{i'^q gC~IrrNSCaa~ \X _ hmmnwlNONmOONNITOITWNN OINNN h ~~ i Jiro .p Y-O yNTINOhmPOyNTiNOhmpOnNTiNm •SM1 PpPPpPpP NnN NN N NM1 NNNNrynNNryryNN N N NNN i i Ol laliaaaailiii11i1i1i1i1i1111ii1 N • LL m 2 WY O N U i \ V NS N aL O J4 J • h LLM WW \ SN n iW wl N V wM 2 wS 1 2 0 Y 2 VO { 1 ~ W i V K i w m II r LL m pOi N ~ J Wi 4 U• 2 i=m TJONN NI hY 4U m0 mYh w F O m f y ; N V V h = UO J ~ X • 000 Ww16V \Ni N m ~ J li i N KS 2 i if i JV y Iw OOw02 ~YVUJ V N NYN M1JI<TChLLW IWf N~IONJ mWUM h SY66 LfJ J JNTJ _ TmNO UNON LLLLwh> Uietl LLL24 M F lu Z NZ JO Y i yW VV yyrynVeOi~•N 1.ShNn2 dU>LLWJO>W u nYJ2JVwit YJ2tlh m 0 f u niX qJ UfN692JhN- F TTT KPF wS22POSV wY.N ~ O NVLSJ NVh JF> M i O~uf IOIVW NNNNwU10llU>SONLLwiL6401t2i0impVNi ^ f < < 7 _ _ _ _ J » > J iff L J L _ N SS Y NNNN LL• l O U n NLL O O 2 W r i o X wJZ f S Y M fVUO _ 2 Nf>• 1I l1l I SZZS W N 2 NY OOf• Ow60fW OO OIy2LLlli fK ~ OVhh NJhOSFNN w Y ~ NNNNO: YwNY 7 J h1 NI W Y NOJYN YhwP f23wYf6YFN Z wN I..Z SO wOZbOWiWJ W KUUNNUhtpiJ OSYf Wi'JN OVYf N LLSiii0Yi0[mhi lOV6iO VZO w LLLLLLHJW6tlO60M0 F • • UZS> OSO V JJJJf N W W SfN W wNJCYO •Zw6 22Ww Y _ _ _ yI V~VVU hLLO wO Ot4Z~J2Vf SnOMf hINIJO w Yi• E [~O Xw16JhWV miJJSSNKKJNNFIJYUW tl N O `V F 00?~•fw w200fW Y N NNN NNNNNNN NphhF1-hl. » )iiSSiif2NN N mTNNTThPP:PNPhTNTOPPiwhNTOmhTPTmy rv r NON 2. ~ •iiThTTOVNOl il NnNTIhTmNmryhNTC ...y.T N T . T T y ~~ w N>~ 9 : :: F:~i .PS =ee~~" ommm mmmmm m _ ~ ' as"s Y kX .~R: >.E~" °^ ... .: saga u ~r~=~ ;'s c C A !i X t ii - si _ ~ ~ ,. F L ~ °s a s Y f ~ .. /D IS:~ p,~~a .: ~ s a,s:: o3:i: :s~:- ei=?? _ ~.,a PSI iffiy~ y. IE ' ~eoR>^>>aR~assagss~asases2e~€€~adP 'saR>-a . ur4C~S^.m.. ..P mo~~e~8$SF3°~„4 a.`~'.°Pro• rm'~ooRS, o ~ PR'S '€FSS .-> o ' °FdR"@SR8Re " PRR a^.8i'uE S'=-5 - - --dS°R _ e .,~ ~ E~ £ ~oy'F. ~ ~gY Y,. .. .. .. .._~. .- .. ., .. __ .iy ~~ - ~.~ s .. ' "YSEaa5555Y$~gC.~..~a°. "'F `.yr_~~ X ~~ ~x ~ SL. b ~6~a'as-y'mY'!Y~E ` eF Y ` k ~~ ' u a :-'~~"' a _ - ~ , ~ ~ , ,~ , ~d ~.` .'. :: W~ a~~Y`~~::. za ~, an v .'F_ W f~1~4~3 s a.`~1 ft <_ °~,&a~n ~ . ~ a' ~ . . - I~ .. - - -----~~.-a-..r-_g=~= _ - ~ - ~_ m ~ _- _ __ 8o8~88SEs&888888&88Y888E && & 8Po ve e y a m=8e~.8_ ~~~:?e~~~~g~m ~ - ' 8~ w^~ .. 8R8R&8xC a`~8 n°RL F'e'$$Ega~$e m Vm m m m .. m~ m .. $S8°Ae ~:;~~89R''Fa'L~~6 ~„^S~RR~ mmm mmmo- m m m m .. .cam .. _ 8888888888 p ~•. m ~•. €'Ro~8`.°-,88e~°. .°.8 °0_~°.BReooi e m _ ~~~s~sSs 8.°.SSSS8SSKK4sK°' - R - 8g - _ s ., y°~,' _ 88888~88888.88888888E888 k 8 & 888 5~€ fr8" °Eve~eF88$~~~~`°08°. 82 £: a ke3 k elm __ `• ___ .. e m ' R~ ~°€~i 3fi88e88veF~8o~$g F; g85 J Y B rt~~u WY'~SV~yH~.. Rs. .. $~~S~a`~ '„~ ~l1P~dY~_~~Y a 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ft YgS g ~F ~yygpGpa 4~ 4Y SY~~N - ., ~R W 8 5 ~ Y L Y 6 '~ F£ ~2 ' S b W' ~ 5 d e -. ~~ S~e ~ s8~~~~isBRS~~~oA Fi a£~ .~~. ~~~. .,~ /~ b' ET y .' .: ~:~~ FR° N ~ .~ g`' - X ~~ d '~ =,~y'3 WS ~ 4~ :=S s 9 ....:::~, Y _ _ - ~y _ a e53aa s~ 4 y J ~'` ~ A ~ p S M'. I3 ~ ~ e m a ~ - _ - 3f. d:e A° d82a ~ SR RRRokR S - ~.; -re X85:; S a`R 8 -a - __ - ~. i. ~5S IIRf a .~ .a .~ .~ ....:.~ ~ ~ .r #- .. _ ___ a ..yR ~wy~~ .. . .-^w - ~ . .. ~$GG1jn Yge~ u if ds~{~L`.EN>Y`~e~ w~a ' .,-:R .:.eke d 9 84 A~~ , o fl~«~C~ ,, :i W., . ..> ~~!~ ., .1 5`: . . . . ~ . - ~ ~ e `1 L F _ R9^388? ~R~Re i ' ~ - 'f V ~ F .. 4 . En .. _,-o.. .. ., S _ %. ~ .. .. _ {{ r x ~. ~Y`~ 3, ~°.€ 8% m oR. ., ~~ .. - r~ .. - x~', ~x "a ~s ~s. Ss~ m ~ '~ 2 mo m°~ N s __ _ .. e~ L 1 _ _ _ X^ .~ .. ~~ 5 S v Y .. 4, `.i Yg F. Y b d .. T Y ~° G ~.~ _ Li - °y. 1 : s ."_ - ~ 5 n 1 APN STATION OPERATORS INC. 11obi1 I 8477 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 81730 Located within a Medium Residential Area Zoning of Adjacent Properties in the area. North Medium Residential 8-14 Du's Ac South Commerical _rlC+ IM1jP AlI1T NPG I(IP llt l.'11 N-I/1 II~I~e~A~ kest Office (vacant) / Industrial Park ISP subarea three jjtorrez 20feb1990 ~I r. ~ i I ~ I - o I ? i -.-r-=nN9o .. ._-waru- r r I 1 APN 208-291-05 STATION OPERATORS INC: Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. y1730 Located within a Medium Residential Area Zoninu of Adjacent Properties in the area. North Medium Resfdential 8-14 Ou's Ac , South Commerical c~.• Modi um Goc irionhiai R-ia rui<<ar West Office (vacant) /Industrial Park ISP subarea three ,),)torrez 20feb1990 COPY__- ' - .~ ......~..~..~_ YfIKA110N 1'0~ IILCOMONK MAM IsYtlNfl 1. ME(5) OF IICFN5E15) FllF NO. Tw Dpsrlww d A4Me4. h,wape Cmkd 1901 4aoa.q SYI Y6PYMUIIq OK sALL aESll c YI16 RECENT NO ~ ~ ~ ~ _ Szr ~h. Cd1.9Y15 . w..... ...n... CppF ~e15 TM urxNrpnM M..SY 9ppli,. b Ikvmer d«niMd mlob.o Dor. 11.~9d :., rvuc",~ in .rRx.w:.r., I T,ro. Rwwl .,lac rcn Jgrnto.• tz. _ MPNed .N«5«. 5101E O FR,mw Der•. / EIr.Mn Dole s. rmisl a }RANSArnoNls) rEE LK. rrrF 9er f 1.ti.o0 2J Mnu,l ~ „p - • ram. N wrNl.. bnl l s Le~eRen a Sp0~w-rlemn« 9nd Sk.N -- ~ - _ - - Y J l a 9p,Nllnp Gr w1 ~wNd IWCM LlMi~nq, ItMi 91)JO Sin WreA[dl TOTAL 5 1]8. J0 '., d II h,mi«. lived. ). M hemkn InuM ' SMw !YW Nlkmr-- Ciry liminl Yu e. Aw;uep Ada... rl6l}.nnr h9m n~-w.nM. «r sI,.N ,....,..,., ]11(iY Re,t •lupdN A9N., SM. T00, fwp,nl, rl~ 91505-1]J3 Mra. '' 9. Ilu.e Yeu mr been <wmkl,d d o lelee}1 10. Mpv, Yee ,ver .iebM arty N Nle gmklom d a,. Ak9hoM Gr«99e reM,el M « rpuNAem N IM Oepen.wnl pr- ~ lainirq b IM Aalt I I1. E.pldn a "YFS" enmer a ilwm p w 10 en an un«Fnlml wNaM ,Adl M dwnpd pen d a1. epplkeMan. IT. Applnml 91,en 1911NN enI mmoper «e91,Yea Nr entl, NemW q«ml« will Mre eF an gwNRmliem d a Ikmlw, and '~~, fbl NM M .III M riehM « ewer « pwNY M V Nd«d eg N M. g«'irem d IM Ak91wM Fe,emM Cam,ol M li ~. q. 5}A}F 01 UINORNMA Cwnry N .....--._....-.r_-____.-_________._Dew---_!_. ______. m. -..--. ~ ~ ~~ ,..-++ti. ~nY a w.~wwe ~'rr+., ur r.w ~+rr ~ ,..~s w~~ +w,+ +.n w ~.. w.w..n 2w,+ Ilj.+tl+~n w wN ~ ni r i. r .rr~n r ..r .u,n w w 1, ..+wr it ~, ~~ w«+n~ ~w+,ir ~. ~. ,:..,vrn.,E . ~. ~~ h •wI~ ~I+w~. wrwr n...e.: w wn~r n,~.r . ~~ .i ~r•••~~ ' w,~ nee r tr .. +a ~, r.r w4w+ n w -n w. ~~tir~ . n «+ w nW! .w~.rt.n. .. ~~ ~ ~n~ ,. t, w, n.iwr Y w,nlww. x wn M1 uwl„ „y4w.n w•r 4 ~.M~n Yr «N. M, !h IL AMIUHT R, ~~, r • . ~. slcn rNFfox~fnFrde -ova,ib:.re'~- - ..""'3"`~`-i=n~c.-va~».»,.:: -----_c --°-,. . _.. .. r9w.~..,en...m...,.M ~......_.,, ' el .- ._ ~I ~ M~RlFC1FTF0N ~C 7~/1Hfi~O~ ' I3. STATF OE ULIY0RNI~ C«nry N______________________________________Oob _....-.--____---......__.___ u+ .,gym w wr ih+, wnn V4...w.M w. .. h ~V.11,w .~ ,F.~ .I it ....t . w ~n.nk. wLL+R M ~In1 w .,4 xw M.i. wu•+...w.. r.,.~i. ni +.n w ~ r.. wri..~. ~w,. I ~~I'I ~riw•N War ti ww ~~ y, ~i iyM~M r ~w~w M; .M i 1 ~I VA ~~+~~w..~,M}„y; AIM NwW~nni~M~ n ~~A U~M,N ~~ ' y.~~ w+... n,n nw...wr `n ws.f h Mr w..NO. A +.n~ .x. eT~~ . ~ ~ ~.I~~r w w Nr M rM. M •wMw~ n w •I.~i ~ ~, ~, u,f~+ ~ in nw k M.n~ gMYwM -~T~~~. 1, nwwmw, ~,M+~ w Xn M~+~ -A .~ mJ~..w v.ui, r, xn Owti~ ra nd w.IN sdeN rive F.w, r« ns+YRR,.I o. olltf ^ Abd.r ~".-"---__°-"~ V -----"-cones Attum ._""""---....:-F..-.-L-~'-"--~.._ ~.,...~ ^ Run,r,N /w d-_..____..-hM pl--... .................._-..OM 9n.-..__.___..____.}wNq N....-_..-____________ ~ ~_ I ~- I a. ~COPY._....._.._.. •. w.Nr AMw raM urb. - err!lrenof! Ia11 AAGOIIOlR ~fNYeN UB7Mflr1 1. 1lvF(31 OF IICFN3F(S Nlf tq. 1r Depleeq d AImMi4 Feerap CwYd lva~ ~ ~~x~ arr sale rltm~ wrxn! fFCEM NO ~ .. ~.~u "' ~ •°"'^" ~ [OGE ]615 IM uNwifpd Mra6r ar/+. b Iwrre devi6N p loruen hard ]. NA6K{31 Of AnlKANrIS) irp. Mrmil suaton Werecoro Inc [_(-• 1 ~ A.w+d ..d., se, loon . r Flbnorln ef..e.. xbe: a. iYrt(Sl OF 114NSACl1ON(31 I !EF lK. Trrt ~ re. I s]oa.ou sn Amw] se.cc • Nwp d MNmb lloCil 3. lesobn d iwnen-NwnMr ad Sh.e W)) Ar c pl6glq AN., y q GIy aM CoeC~ ~^e^M' xgnceo Aroo9B Itrl 9It10 9qn fhrwrdl iOTAI 3 1]8.00 q Ir neriet IATeYE, ). M heriel Inwde Shaw Ttp d 14 r CM linint Tgg F. Ab6bp Adbev (161hrenl hwn ll~Mrbr rd Urea n...i ~~I v. Mme yp eti Mm aenv6l.d d a lelen/1 10. Hpe 1W eler riolel.d mT d he Frn;uq d 6r Akahdk leerere CeMId b w lr o! the Dapabwnl pn Iu+JM p 1M Aatt 11. Feagn a "RS• anger b Ibiw 9 w 10 on p erp6Tnq wNS6 Adl N dwrN ren d Mn eppFaeFen. ll. SiAi! OF ffAVMlq V~~n Cwr1! N .~ ~-__.__________,__Doe___~3~452.._.____.. ... +.ww. r.-. ~.... ,r .,....... w, , y.~.. w ~ ww ti wn~ ..•.e.~: ~.w..e w....w.. -~ rr~V nrMnMr v )`~ ~ YI wA ti i M Y wow ~r ~, ~~e,~a.n ~ Flu. Irv ~~ w ~r t nn ~ . Y ti rM.-~v . ~u~ ~ waw w x..~.i ~rn.A. !1 wl Y ewwv ~..... Y +..wr 4 wnh 4n wir M Yr w ~NF rrrw Y YM ~ X.r rew4.n~ w 4 n w w~ur wNw~r ., utiw 4 M.r w W~ Derr I 1 wJw Oar .wr 4 ~.arnr F ..~... M1 wWU+ w ~i n i w n e....~. ( ~ M s, ~ SIGN lIHF Kl___.tir____ ____ _____________ ~ w ~ ° 41 tae rtKlm Orpgtsr }r. ' .__... . 4..u.u ~9ilea are M~ 1!: lTATF d CAUlOlAA Cergf a______________________________________[bb.___..._._. _._..__.______... ., r.Ml I wwr. ~ rw urr Jerwr ~r wiMr N .F ~~ F • rnn Mrs M Y Iwwwe wnlw wlriwn M fir/ ewww nerr~r w ... lhl: rli ?w b Mr. inY~ nn~Yw+ wn r.q n Mwa arw wl w ~n w w~~ w.l w4 ,ru,wr Mu N ~ ewey M wnM ar 4 puww~ IY Y h wMw wtlvMw w wnnw MM14~r w,r w rMr i4 er)rr~ M e ~. ~. 4 Mon rtit :ti wwe yw Mry eT wrie ~ rr ~ ~4d h ewlw w14M n aM M ti hnww. w~rw M w u~qw M x~w w w rAra w lys~ wn nM ,~ vrAwr M wnlw wl.rM 1 Y ~:nrnr h ww. r. w14r r Y I4rw M n ~W ......r Y 1 Newrer Dq Na Mrllr Moe TAY L4q rp Deprxrea Up Q; AnpM~ ^ AwrMr aglkq. 0 A~r!NS/T~-------------"--"-- I ~------"_Cdk3 A4HW ."----~- ~~-t//_iQ. ~.,..., ^ Aaevwh w a---........rw a---------------~------°-. oAb p-°---°-----e'aro' N...°-------~--°--- CtTY (IF RANCHO CUC/V10NB11 C ] FI0.D [ 7 INBP 1oC11O1 ~ _ SfA'ne.J o/~°~-e~~+w~ CODE ENFCIRCENENT &lRE/Ml C 7 CIFF ICE C 7 NARN At~i~ E O/ CAGE ACTIVITY REPQiT Iit PVIOPE Ij7 INFO 9_~,j ~,-3SfL__~d ~-- ~w HANDLED BY ~ ~~LGU~___ ~___~ I _ DATE_~ / /Z /_~O T1t1E ~ ~7 REGARDINS: ~~~HAC.~f F/E~.aGt C_~r.~,ov~~~l_.. HT~. ~/ PERSON CONTACTED?®,ND NANE /`L fJ.~~__L~Y~L~_~~'f_YSR-____~_ ~/ ' >~ -'i _ INFO F/,3=- 7z~9s __.~~~~n'»i?~ ----L/ 730`----~fac~ sr.3~i,_---------- u'eSCRIPTiONs_/_LCC~f1JG_=~p~fJLll1L~-_~-L=`?2!21Ld~_-`'TT° i~'~7~ _ __-TtC~_~Fl1~P~/_L1.~-__/z=~ ~1___I~~EL4!_~_YZ_°_%'~__S/1~_G/w/GO_ _ _~~L;UGr1L_~~~f~l~~--~~---Cir,Y_ _l~_itT/_CC! __-_ AGO -- ~!_cr1~ __1r_~~---~p-~"~=-------------------------------- --- ----- ~ ~~~__/v~Ef~_~-_' i,~/v u-L~L?_~E~ ~1G.2 -1~i~i»s-o -Tf ~~~~' /~~FOo/~: ~/~ i~~L-2 -.Ti.4r-~iyi~l~ar~ NEXT ACTION: _ TYPE:_~_ STATNS: ~~ AREA-APNC ZZ Z-~ ^ I ir.:r w: a~ uM un J i ~-- ~r 0 0 ~„I nr.l ~ ti,.~ O/~. b p ,'~~c :.«: ~~' , ~~ % / / I 1 ..~ ~l9 JIl / / ~ / / I ~ a /0 O O 1 ® ~F i APN 208-431-27 STATION OPERATORS INC. 9315 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 81730 Located within an Office Zoning Zoning of adjacent properties . North: Office and Medium Residential 8-14 Du's Ac South: Office and Meduim Residential B-14 Du's Ac East Office and Meduim Residential 8-14 Du's Ac West Office (vacant) a~- Jjtorrez 20feb1990 - COPY._.L.~:~~ NRkAlION IOl KCOIIOIK wYt-N {ECMW~I ]« u[vwNe[N N AkoXdk CCCNnee e[neei Ivor raasy sw,w.wae, CdA. 9A11 sae svaaaonEO :....w....:.e,.[.,w.: iM wlsN:en.e a...eE eppf ro[ SNNN e.«.YNe., rob.. ]. NaME(51 d AERKIF1f(n - ~ I. MHS) of uCENSE(5) wr said aux a Inee . TYEFIS) Df TEANSACIIOIII51 HLE N0. ~~~ ~. ~ ! ~ CIFOGIIUHK.4 cox .ImS oel. aw.d rMP. Mql ~ lK. iYOE a . ,'l D] - ~ _~~ .. Neme d blin.N N.wi l s. Iwoxon d Wlinnl-Nrl~l4w aM Slmr 1 W L ] ] ~on Aw., y ~ « ~ ~nry ~Mip Cuc~a 1{Y) 91 ]]U Sb M[MLCI iOTal 51]ti. UO O Rry.WS. utwuM, ). An hlmmllntiW snw iroe a liw ~- cXr u,met *.. a. aaleq Addrwl ra d~11weIN awn s)-EANw« wd sMw ~y+.,l;...~ u aasDC-A335 w.e. 9. Ywle yw eyw e[en [ani[Ne d a roa,M 1D, Yew Y^+ ...r rwieNd wry d XN neriliww q XN AkeheGe Nrxeen Cwwq M w I[YCbNwn el Mw Oepereww y«- 11. Evplein o •'T!S" enlwr b iNn 9 w 10 en an anollMml wll'sN Ywil W EwwN poM N Mil opOlicNNn. IT. AgliwY tgrx[ awl XM «ry wwgyer «nplq[d 'w on•lele IKenW pelllilel will aun oX MN eilwli5[Nenn d Y li[emw, eM tl lh« M wIX ror .'rgeN «[wN « 'Nile wdfwi .ny ei Nw «e.iNwl d the Akd~oGc b+er1aq fon`tcl An. N. 51AfE M CANEOnNk VI~.h1A CaYnry d _241e1R1f_____________________0.N__..1 ~_j~.O._!._.. YMr ~. N I+MI. J Yw .N. yam. ~.w M M ~. ~ N~iw~l, IIy,Y~i+, .~..: M + .~..II-. ~ .~. [..e . w.o .r'-~ ~ + .N',..:~...M,.. m ~ ...A. F.N. .'~i 1~,~~ w.. w.+ ~w t[.a +w ++r+..rM..r sr1 ...N.: r. ....~. N.I. ~.. ..~IW 4+n~. MeF w.W I+~.-..I+rWwin +n w^ •Ww+r~ „ µ Y,C M M Owr~~.l w + ~ + wY: N Mr..µ + •+In. +n •waw 1 Nww: In :u w xr1+ gNµw.,. u. M +.Mn-n F "M. M WNV++^~^ u~~ ~n+n h C~I+w~~ '-~ T' ~~ ` r aERICAM _ n n II \\ ' /rl EIG[! N ~ _ .. ____ ~_.~ .. ..... ..... .... .......... aa)O~~yu_•____ 41EY[ 3fSCZdi dvuiso[. tee. [uzM[.. , ,.:..,«n ~ _ ~:r•--.. --------------- 60MYN[ION [FIw[[ W«N py____________________________...._____.....__.___... ._________... ___ ___ . A~l1eM10N /~ 7RM/Ml{1~"~•••w... .. I3. S1AlE O CAUfORN1A Cwm] N ......................................OeN.___._..______._...._._..__ e.W...r. w .„. +.:.:....~. .eY., w . w Nw+ N M .+w I. .we, . M W....~ mil..:;.. a+. wa.:r . + ..:i.w..l... ~il ~« .. w .w..... . + M wN[ us.nM1l Welty. YY+ .y a ..MM w M ~nMr ":.. +~ly,wn +Mi +. M'ww~ rµr • .d I.nl+ F .ywN Nr Wr ewes: OI ww N+ w++M .wIN+:+: + V w:e w~+ n n+nr h nr.ew N ANe~ ~~ +wr Wn I~a~ M1 br ~ +r. H...wN+ wNw+w n M wr+len + Nn .ertl.s.l. •N+w w w h w. ml~w eW+µr n + M.+./ +.µn p .MNw N w.NU+, u M :4 xeN+ .INww:+. nw Y ..++.w w µN+ M .wl'µwµ+ • Iles +ia n :wN:'w ur~w w A Ae:enr Da Nq Wrke Ml[1o 7AYWIFw DeyeNweaE ffw OnlE ^ ElaNdnY E[PNa ^. ^ •-----------------------•- --------cone auaro .-------`/-~-~+-~ ~-------- ..,.., ^ bnee'ell M N_.....___Aii q ............................. OIIIN en_........___.._.. WCM W..____......._...._._ w of Vl Z N 'O .v ~+ 3 O O O O j O O P ~ r* rr a n v ~ s ~ m ~'~ r v ~ o r s o ~c ~ m F a d A o n 3 P C 6 Z 3 N 3 ~+ l O D N \ d !C ~ G x n ~ ~ m _ _ ~ _ m ~ ~ .. - n A O N Y d (p Z O ~ ~n O J -~. a m n w n o m s .. M ~ rt M r' ~c z w ., m n m s o• 0 S S O O 2 C) O £ m 3 w w 3 N 1/~ (V ff rf ~ .. .. n r z a o ~o E -~ e P s w v N O 6 S !0 O ~ O N d a n O N Z D n v a z J ae N 0 i m N A ut 3 d O Z \ ~ N ~ ` C 10 o w 1 m m i N 1 fl r x 3 TT ~ m i ~ d v < r a COPY._--. _. r..r. ww~.w.w.rrurrr- ~ ~~~ !0~ A1C011011t MAM ~~1 I. rrrrysl or ucfHSE(s) Re ea, r« oq.i..n N AkvMi4 u..T CoenN ~, ~ Tool •..e.w s xsAlomo a sua S usn~ saan,.n., cdo. vsele m ~oeeArleru ...~.~..,~..~..~ cooexu rM we.:o..e Fw.6r nn+..M ~ o.. ~n« daui6.d m bb.c liovd t. nAAY(A a AnIICAnf(3) iwq. Iwer boo.d wd« s... tbu ^ __ _ ,•• nr..3.. o.i. . [11.ni.. eel. Tnc wt sou, n a. rays) a rRA1+3ACTOn1sl rs iK. TYlf roc sn. sao, ol.x.«.n 3 Gol fwn Ifin, fAAlznin u.n u. Lu... w ~ I -licSAA Con Iw.u bnc. Ch 3e Tin9 ^. MAO. BtonAflA[. A Nome N SoYnw Gpip. t'p. epnY __ J. lvaoxon d FNmn-Niwbw ed Sn.w xse .oomsu u.a., eloz ary .d Lp Cib [~.wt s rmu 'i 4 tl M«IY.IbIMtl. 1. An hwiw MdY '~ Lw rYM N I:tinr N-r3tYt Cllr I:.ini it e. AtailLq Adbw M Al1ilN1 ea« sl-N..e.. wd LnN rr...i in..l v. enn yw n.. e.w mn.iwd d n I.lonrl 10. Nn.. p n.w .IMeiid n.Y d b noNllwi N Ow AkelieL[ e...,ao. CaNrd M w ngINW. N e. Orpvhrnl pw. 11. Eglun a "Y6^ waw p exn. 9 « 10 w an ww.lnaw .lid dr w ~~ M d Mn nlPtrrw. It „I ~ Fi MlnwYeli a ~ MMy axM`w~1M~wm~w N iv A4aMi Unwei CeMrel ANmr. aJ 11. STAi[ P CNMpMA Caunry N _.lAl.IOwIR_____.___.____Dw_____ ~~/~ __...... ..v..r. w ..w... r s .... A..r .~. . - . r.. r. ... w i... .... ~ i ,.... n ..r.. w ~. n..., i n. nyr... ywin,. .w,... r .n.rr w .: n.u.i ti~ ~w mow...., .IYY4Iw rYY i~JUM.rYnr~•.4~.n•NYw r.. r~...w Y..~ w.,. .. e~..r.. r-...ur.. '...~ti....~+.. "x~n m Y A _Ai•.. F niw s .~ n ,w w.y. n... Yu... n .Mn. nI ~ An Y wnlw Wun ~ -.~ ... ~~y i.A4r .. 4 Mme.. w a ..,. 1.F AMKAM r LION IIA! .11L4 ..JJf1 ._.ye..._.._ .................................................. ........ . f )•7 _taelil.ltigp~Jr ...... ___ _____ _______________ ... M~UC~TION n TIIANN~ROII IS etAT! d CA4IORtlA Cowry M____. ~_~~ .............bw___..... ~/tf/N WY Imo. ! .. d r~ .I~ ~yw...M. ~ ~~". w. un~ :i, iw rFn Kn N N n.ww i4 +~r L 1w.4~ +eqM ~nw. M ~.i~n~ .. .~~ ~unw n~M `YN. n +r 4 tiw W. yIM.Y Wnw Y M. wM. .rl ~...~ YY~ w. w .Jn n.n w iY wwiti ti w I~wln .JnF1 n Y qv Me.n tl Ln wVw.n .I. wJn 4 .~m~ F .+ war iN r. h inMn ~hMn n .~~ •r/~ n r .~« n Wr f nr~+ M . r., n .. M.W .~..•w+.w.w w ~. M .Yn M wr.r ...n ...ua. .n... ~.r+n r w ..+~ w sn~ . n wy n w.lw.. n I.r ~ erti I w,W.n n . M... n Y.. nr ..Fn ~ w.Iw~, b w.Mn X+'n M .A6....r~ +/r..r r erg w .~ ~n+w. uMry n Y r9n~~. "' ^ MMwMIwN ._1WM .. ...._OCIOM .. _Anl/I IIA ______________________ • «n~ d NN Mrlr blie TAY Lir; par DQiI/IIYif Uw Ods AllnAwlr p IbLe wlY.. ^^ iL ~( ^ n+~r nwA Sl~ - p .___________________________..... ._. cons Aw~w ..sff!1!e R- _~ a i~ 91730 Located within the Old Gemco Center Comnericial Zone. Zoning of adjacent properties. North: Conmericial and Low/Medium Residential 4-8 Du's Ac South: Cormeric ial and Medium/High Residential 14-24 OU's Ac iaSt emi,ucriGdi West Conmerical ~/ jJtorcez 20fe61990 China Town House 9030 foothill Blvd. 8102 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. COP\rr•., _ .~+w• wrthAfr.eriwu~f..- YY-IIE~1gN IOe AICOIgII[ eMM1 1bEeMA I. TT/f(S) a IJWISGA Ml NO. _ r w ~wiwr a AkMr1k e.r.e. Cennol YEQq no 1ED ~asi'Oy a YwWWYn s w YAts ®. YIR { ._ ~ ' mwe.re, EaM. 9%1s rassc l1JICY txotilunrut ""°""^~ d ~ cou w1s N~ ..° ~a~• hn d ° ~ °"' i. eLw. d.. fr .e le.ed a. EIM1F(S) a AIRIGM(37 Tenp r.nnn AgYed Mid. Src ]ab ^ gfM[LL. Sutllth L. L Rl rlurd d. rllera.~M1w~ ILLWnp fR~n:.. M„ ]. TTrE(5) Oi IYANSACIION(5) ~ lK. IYEF nw sina I H Mnael !w 19B DG R 91 e. r,r. a Mhow ewell'n InL~ SwM PnYte9[rnt 5. LaLVYLn d Ma~w~-NUnd~r ud Sneer 69J] rtlwnde Aw. cry eel ro Led. cf.+r i NYerhu ulo..ma• 91Y]9 Yen erryrd TOTAL A9fi,00 P n rrrrwL YtewM, )..1n h Inr-0r Slwwl~d lit«ue {0-IOWO] wrr~r~e e1.65 C'ry l' t it e. Mal.o Adder fr d11«.nr irrw SF-lMwbw ab Yrew nt.rl n...r e'r vw~ 9. Mare Yw eret bern Lwdtlyd d a lebnyr 10. 11Lte rer e.w .:ebY/ w•Y d do Pet~we d rM AkMaKt e.nrrae. Cannel b w •rerbxaw a the YLPnnwd pw. IainiA b de AnT I I. Esdan a ^TS^ amww b Yew 9 w 10 an r erNtbnr diILA dell b• dLwxd pwl a M's epphceYuf - _ ' It. ApliLOn slew (sl d.r w'.aaoerr ^MLM b wW NwL..d a«uel .i he.r rN dw noeewYein a o fiww... wW ' Ibl da hr .III r tbkb w Lover w pwwM b d eielelyd d Nn a dnwll w Lover w b d AlsdgN~CdMa AgAO I]. STALE Of CALNOYMA G^a^4 a .. W.~~ .Delr.__________~ ~ ~ ' VIM ~t J r~lwr. ~L wr. ^r~ ynL,~ µ.. ~w~tn N .v ~i~+, w ~IM M1 ~ Wn. ~ ~nN ~wrrL wr w nn ~r ~M W M ..+~n.L r~rM w T, M me +~y ~ Iwo 4w1 ~q Xu M ww~`nn n .~L.~a. L~.n ~ , _ iw..w '- h ~rlsr. ~ nr~:.m~ws.n ' n~nM ~nisnn ~ iw+L w~M~ n •~° L' -'L^w1 -W +- 4w r Yn ~n h In ~ MJ r M-nY ~ ,~ W .n h,M..~ni~w L~'~~~Miii~vM-~ tiMd,.-~~r w M~,L a ~y-e ~ n. -. ,I w..I~: Ifl xw M1 innl- ~MrM.w..nr Y .. M..^n F ~.w w, w4M ~ M w. mJ .Mi4 n, an~~~ n,n~ a ^L t w IL. AIRKAM ~ •. ' SKAI MFEE _.1..._...._~~ ........................ ....________ _ ____. IMrLIC117pN ~~ 7~ANlAlO[ IS. STATF OF CAQEO9dA <wnry d__._.__... ._._.Peb_____________________._. _.... M. ~~~q xww ~ya~ar. M w ~..+.~~•~n.~u.r rrx.~ .~ ~n~w~~iii nw i. i.wr ~~M.ew n ~~~ -..i`:.a :~....r~ r e.w, :n nn~f.....r..r~..... n'~...w ...w i....ti"t` ...m n....~. a : ~ ~~r~Ln nM~~ ~ M wt ~M~ M wdw~ w Y1~1 er nn~ ~ ~.µ- N w.nM~. M innN ~nvnw .M^n L~ w~~r~ nMfe+. e- 4~r .in .~ ~r IWp~ rF iy an~w~ De Na Mriq Irby ]7dr cbry lw Drgrtinnll Vw o+M1 ALbdbF. O Yewrdrd rkr, p__.____._.____~________ ..... . ......._conn bMm._____..____..__:~_!!._____.._______._.._ .w..., ~ YewnM ew a__.._____.la1w...._________..__k.....___OYh»an________________1rMYr br ____.__. ~vr $'1GC I x'11 ~ .~ $~ )o ~ s P n f9 ~436I . 7 I~"' iz,,: 0 n p u i ® ~ T' 1.53 AC ':' ~ / 435 G. l: APN 229-161-03 I Howell's Farm House Restaurant of 33 cciwa naa Ave. µ Rancho Cucamonga, LA 91739 Property currently zoned: industrial Specific Plan Subarea II - General Industrial Zoning of adjacent properties: North: I,S.P. Subarea H - General Industrial South: I, S. P. Subarea 8 - General industrial East: I.S.P. Subarea 6 - Generai Industrial West: i,S. P, Subarea 15 - Heavy industrial Prepared by: R. Alcorn 3/1/9II d~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council / FROM: Duane A. Baker, Sr. Adminieirative Aeaiata~~`~ SUBJECT: Resolution Ch 1 Cit C 1 M tin Ti Per Ciiy Council direction at the meeting of February 21, 1990, staff has prepared the attached resolution. TRis zeeolution will supersede Resolution No. 7'/-5 which aet the meeting time at 7:30 p.m., and will change the dwsignated time for Clty Council meetings to 7x00 p.m. DAB:jls 90-015 oQ7 RESOLUTION N0. 90-*~* A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION N0. 17-5 DETERMINING THE DAY ANO TIME OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Regular meetings of the City Onunr i,l of the rity ns Rancho Cucamonga shalt be held on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. unless the same shall be a legal holiday, in which event such regular meeting shall 6e held on the next succeeding calendar day. SECTION 2: This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 77-5. 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: March 7, 1990 ~;UCAMp'YC ~ 9 j Ki Y of ~ I~ A ~C Q BIZ ~L_ - a .." To: Mayor, Members of City Council and City tf~~ agar From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager I,/,~- $llb]eCt: POliCV GniAellnee aCr ~CySieitivi, nnu ~ v Development of Future Park Facilities City Council accept the attached resolution setting policy guidelines for acquisition and development oP future park facilities. On Febrvary 21, 1990, City Council had discussion on prioritizina acquisition and development of future park facilities within floating park designations. City Council requested that staff ornnern .. _ ~-'tic: eLli„y policy on this issue for direction toe acquire and develop future park sites as opportunities arise within the city. The resolution for acquiring and develapinq park facilities eats policy for staff and the Park and Recreation Commission to pursue land and develop parks as opportunities arise in the "floating" park designations in the city's General Plan. J5/kls AttaCh~ent cc: Park and Recreation Commission RESOLUTION NO. 90- C5 9~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF -'-.:a, 4ni+1r viiliTA, SETTING POLICY GUIDELINES FOR'ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF FUTVRE PARR FACILITIES WHEREAS the City Cnnnrtil i¢ mmnni-f ivn no ..+~+ - _ p.o.....ng ..yeii space and parks and recreation opportunities throughout the city, and WHEREAS the coat of open apace is increasing and the availability of land in certain parts of the community are becoming more limited, WHEREAS the City Council desires to establish general guidellnee for the acquisition and development of future park facilities, NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby support the following policy: 1. Land should be purchased for land banking when the availability of funds coincides with the o~mnrtnn±t;• «^ acY,:1.¢ 1¢uun ac a reasonable price. 2. Attention should be immediately directed to fletermine land banking poeslbilities in the southwest Cucamonga area because of the limited availability of land to secure in the near future. 3. Priority should be given to the development of parka in areas where residents have a desire to contribute through participation in the maintenance of the facility through the appropriate maintenance districts. 3a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 1, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ui: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUB dEC T: INITI ATE_A LANDMARK ALTERATTON 7FRMt7 rno roc ~ O1G IiDUSE - App ro Val to initiate a Landmark Alteration Permit to move the Ledig House (Landmark No. 13) from 5702 Amethyst Street to a Site east of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center and physical alterations related thereto. RECOMMENDATION: Approval 6y minute action to initiate a landmark alteration permit application to relocate and restore the Ledig House for the purpose of. housing the Community Services Department staff and services. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The G. P. Ledig House was designated a Landmark by the City Council on Rugust 3, 1988 (see attached Resolution). In addition, for some time now the Ctty has been seeking bids for the sale and relocation of fhe Ledig House, ', oca ted at 5702 Amethyst Street, in order to find a qualified buyer for sale and relocation of the house. The Du rc ha se and the moving of the house was and is necessary in order to allow for the planned extension of Wilson Avenun, we<t from amu rti,,~. c..,,,,. The City has been unsucc essfui in securing a qualified bid to sell and relocate the house. Since the time is approaching when Wilson Avenue must be extended as a Condition of Approval for Tentative Tract 13930 and an opportunity has presented itself to relocate the Ledig House (Landmark +r13) from its cu rreni location to a site east of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, staff has brought forward the current request td initiate the Landmark Alteration Permit application. Subject to separate City Council action, the currently budgeted Redevelopment Agency Funds of E300 ,000, for relocation and rehabilitation during the 1989-90 and 1990-91 fiscal years, is available. The parcel to which this structure would be moved to and rehabilitated on is owned by the City and is currently vacant. Two conceptual site plans have been developed by the Community Services Department staff and are included as Exhibits "A" and "B" to this packet. The house wau ld be restored in order to nrn vide needed A.dmi ni st rative Office sedcp for nrn_gra_me de...e^tty hou Scd within the Neighborhood Center. The action of the City Council to initiate this application would merely begin the process of approval by the Historic Preserve tf on Commiss loo to authorize the moving and restoration of the Ledig House. It should be noted that only the oldest portions of the Ledig House would 6e moved and the rear addition, constructed only a few yea r5 ago, would not be a part of the moving process. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LEOIG HOUSE ALTERATION PERMIT March 1, 1990 Paga 2 "'~e~1 iu i i B d 8 er1 City anne Attachments BB:LN:js you i i t /~ Resolution No. 88-503 Exhibit "A" - Concept Plan Exhibit "B" - Concept Plan Photograph of LeC ig House 3'~ RESOLUTION N0. 88-503 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP AAN CHn CUGroNGA; rAr rsneyL~ i+iiitUV lea: DESIGNATION OF THE G. P. LEDIG HOUSE LOGTTSD AT $702 AMETHYST Ap ENUE AS A LANIMARR WHEAEAS, the Nintoric Preeetvntion Coamiseion hen head a duly edv er ti eed public hearing to r ...i dtr -+ -„mmeni• on the proposed Landaark Deai gne tian end issued Rasol ui ion^No. 86-Ill recommending to this City Council that said Landmark I/ecignntion be epprwed. WHEREAS, the City Council hee received and rev iexed ell input fzca the Hiec oric Preee rvetion Commission regarding said Landmark Deeignetion. WHEREAS, all legni prerequieitea to the adoption of this Raeolutlon have occurred. NW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as Follws: SECTION 1; The •ppl ira tion •pplie• to property located •t /uaeuor Pe reel Number 1062-071-08. SECTION 2: The proposad landmark meets cha tollw ing Grit scan estebli shad in Chapter 4.24.090 of the Rancho Cucuonga Municipal Codn: A. Hier oriel and Cultural Sion:He..,~.. 1. The propoaad landes rk i• pe rtf culerly representatfye of e hiet on eel period, aryl e, end ray of life. 2. .The proposed landmark ie an e:mple of a type of building xhich xas once common but is nw tare. 3. The proposed landmark was connected xith an important local peraomal ity. B. Historic Architectural end Engineering Significance: 1. The Overall effect of [ha design of the proposed landmark im beset iful, or ate de tails end materials an buutiful or nAeeuel. 3S Resolution No, 88-507 Page 2 C. Neighborhood and Ceograph is Setting: 1, The proposed landmark in ire location represents en eetebl fished end fine it ier visual Eeetute of rh. ,. ....+._ SECTIDN 3: Designs tion of a landmark is ezem pt from CE'9A (Article 19, Section 15308), SECIiuH_4: Based on rh....h..o-tlal evidence cane ived end rev iered by th fie Council end based on the findings set forth above, NGW, TR EREF-RE, HE IT RES DLVEp t6 et the Rnnebo Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve de eignetion of the G.P. Ledig Rouse es a landmark. PASSED, APPRpVED, and ADDPTEp eh fie 3rd day of August, 19F8. AYES: Hroxn, Buque t. Stout, Ring, Bright Noes: Nona ABSENT: None Dennis L. Stout, Nayor ATTEST: i ~- i\ / ~l1fG.~.J ~[Ll~il/~ eve ru 1y A. Auth ale r, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AU TNELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Glifornie, do hereby certify thst the foregoing Reaolut ion ras duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucem ~~ge, Glifornie, et a regular meeting of a•;d City Caunc it held on the 7rd dwv of a........ Executed th fie 4th day of August. 1988 et Rancho Cucamonga. Glifornie. l n ]'~~ ~._ l/. E'a~71 of Beverly Authele t, Citq Clerk 3~ f~ou~ j i I j i ~ ~ ~ i i P~alG Naze: Rr.,e srytss PYUS ?~ ~~ ~~ f cNE N.G. /tea ,llo~: dv'OFfi°AV71lC~,~fo/E,o~t ,~ .~~~,+,~ ~,mw,ga. a~-.o,~+v ~ ,~ P~-R~---------- - `= I /,, ~~ /5' m I `/ \ ' / ~~ ~. R.G.rI. ~ ~ ~, _ ~ \ ~_ II lr_~_ p~ " ffsT ia+m: LEDIG HOUSE Ttt1e: CONCEPT PLAN !}1~W R7~ ~ ,No/t: 6dofq~IJAt~Re,~'aYmfa ~, MA7yu0AYt~IfRANA6~, I `xr~i I /N6R£55,~ r-~--~-r-r-I i i 1 f i i _) ~ ~ I I i l~ ~ i i ~ ~ I `~ ~ I j I ~i ---~` ~~4r~x~-uoC~cus y~ OLY9 ~ d/6 N.L. A~OEO. i I I I ~~ Gi~cu~e~iAt 0~~,^~y~ g, -- / ~~ R, G./~l, G -- Cif ..,\ ~'. \ y y y ,,. f~a~ :I I I. ~ i~~ 1 4 . '3 ~l•7 '~, ~, \ /\ i~. ~~~~ ,arAi/~ sT item; LEDIG HOUSR 'ittb: CONCEPT PLAN la:Wblt: B sceba "=20' "f'he 91 year oIJ LeJig HomesteaJ at 5702 Amethyst St. i!~ \ Hl4tQrl~ Ikbir~itloO ~" ;~ CI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager ("1 FROM: Russell H; Ma~~i+.w r+.y c...a ~`~r ~J ~ BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil~Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, parts ? and I? fcr the Highland Avenue Reconstruction from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue Lo reconstruct the south side of Highland Avenue ~ and issuance of a Categorical exemption therefore. ~ RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the Highland Avenue Reconstruction from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue to reconstruct the south side of Highland Avenue and issuance of a Categorical exemption therefore. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed Highland Avenue Reconstruction from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue, In conformance with the California cnvlrnnnwe.a, n..,,+... ._. uutaeitnes, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction~of the above-mentioned reconstruction. This pro,~ect consists of replacing existing Highland Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue 1n cooperation with Alta Lama School District •for the development of Vineyard Junior High School. The new alignment will be with respect to the future Route 30 Freeway. The City's portion of the new road will include pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street trees and street lights. It 1s the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed pro,~ect will rat create a significant adverse impact on the envlrormant and therefore recam~mend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt, since said work entails the reconstruction and improvement of an existing roadway. . ~. "nes ly ~ fitted, R M: M0:1 _- / Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 9D- Q / 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL tuT71AL cTl%Y pyn reel uurc nc A rATFr_nRl reL CYC~oTt~p cnR THE PROPOSED H16HLAND AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO MAYBERRY AYENUE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available Input concerning the proposed Highland Avenue Improvement from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue; NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California EnW romaental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Environmen a ssessment Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed Highland Avenue improvement from Hermosa Avenue to Mayberry Avenue. SECTION 2: The City Clerk 1s directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant ~Efie California Envirurmiental Quality Act. ~I ENVIliONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION GENERAL iil'itiii Oiviil - rC~isl~ i Far aii projects reouiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted Co the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application 1s made. Uport receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will Drepare Part ii of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commies ton. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The prdject will have no sign if lc ant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will De filed, (2) The project wilt have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report w111 be prepared, or (3) M addttlanal information report should 6e supplied by tM applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title: Hiahl and Avenue; Street Improvements - South Side Hermosa to ADOlicant~c Name CAAr~.• ra!<v~diid r;.,. Name, Address, Telephone of Person To 8e Contacted Concerning this Project: Nike nljyi~r location of Project: South Sfde of Highalnd Avenue; between Nermasa Avenue and Mayberry Avenue. Assessor's Parcel No.: N/A List defier pernrits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency 1ssuing such permfts: City encroachment permit and road closure permit ~~ PROJECT DESCRIPRON Proposed use or proposed pro.iect:_ Reconstruct the south side of Highland Avenue, between Hermosa and Ma yDerrv Avenues including curb and gutter sidewalk, street liohts and asphalt pavement. Acreage of protect area and square footage of existing and proposed 6utldings, if any: 1 Acre Descrl6e the environmental settln of the pro~ect site including lnformatton pn toDOgraDhy, so s a ty, p ants (tttes , land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspectt, land use of surrounding properties, and the descrfpttpn of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets)• _ The site currently serves as a road and with these proposed improvements would provide access to the now under cons *.ructicn Highland Junior High School. The south side of the proposed improvements fs Ca lTrans right-of-way for future Route 3o Freeway. The Droject will cause the ramnval of Eucalyptus wind row on the south side of Highland Avenue. [s the pro~eet Dart of a larger pro~eet, one of a series of cimlulative actions, whleh although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental tnlpaet No ~3 PILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a Substantial change in ground contours? z 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _ ~ 3. Create a subst antla7 change in 4emand fer .^.runic!pal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)1 _ ~ 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ % 5. Remove any existing trees? How manyTy~ ~ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fiammables or explostvesT % Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): The trees need to be removed in order to safely realign Highland Avenue. ~~ Ett!.;=tom t~L '~-''t of sew oya anu aUl iU waaLe materta is this project will generate daily: None B. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated dally by this prOj eCt' u~.,e 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, 1n cubic yards: aooo 10. If the project lnrolves the construction of residential units, complete the fora on the next page. CERTIFIGTI011: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and inforR;atton -equired far this initial evaluation to the Dest of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and informakion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. !further understand that addttlonai information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can De made by the Planning Division. Date• ~ %' ;'l% Signature Y---. -z l.l~ °~ RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION i6e rviivnrtry rniormacion snauia oe pryviuea io Ln! L1Ly OT Rancne CUC dmOnga Planning Gtvision in order to aid the school district 1n assessing thefr ability to accommodate the proDOSed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Specific Lac at ion of Pro3ect PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: _^_ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Mode ll and i of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range V CITY OT tANCHO CQCA`[ONGA PAR2 II - INITIAL STCOY EWIAONTLrNTAi C9ECIv,IST qpp. ICA;;T; City of Rancho Cucamonga eILiSG DATE: LOC NVHDER: PROJECT: Nichl-nd Avenue Street Improvements pROJEC: LOCATION: th sitle of Mi hland Avenue between Hermosa Avenue and Mayberry venue. I. EWIAO~'."1:NTAL I:'Q'ACTS (Explanation of all "yea" and "maybe" enavers are required on attached shoe ca). YES :4AY9E NO 1. Soils and Ceoloev. V311 the proposal have signi: icar.c resin es in: a. Cnstab le g:pund conditiom pr In change in Qeo logic relationships? b. Disruptions. Aa•p Leeo:.::. wmy.c Gaon or burial of the soil? c. Change Ln topography or stound surtacs contour intervals? d. The descructiom. eoverin~ or sodlflcaeion of any un1que pologic or Dhysleol lsatureaa. •. My pegncisl imtteale in vlnd of va ter sroslon of roils, atfseeing either on at oft site condltons? t. Qunjas !n erosion sil cation, or depoa is ion? g. 2spesure o.' paoaie or properey eo geolo'ic hasards suoh as earchq uakas, landslides, mud- slides, ~rovnd failure, or similar hasards? h. M inenaae !n eM rac• of exeraetion andloe use of any mineral reaouree? 2. Nyd roloty. ^ill the proposal have sianif Scant teauita tn: '^ W x x x _ __ Y.. _~ ~ _ X _ -_ 1 -~_ ~ >:., .,. , a. Changes in Darren es, or cn• course of dire[ clon of (loving streams, rivers, ar eyhexeral ac: tam ehannels? Y b. Chan gee in absorp ct on races, Qralnage yatterna, or eh• rata and amount of aurtaca eater runoff? % c. Alceraclons ca the course oT floe of flood eaters? ~ __ X d. Change Sn ch• amount of aurfau we ur in env body of eater? V_ ~ _. uiacharge Snco furfac• vacera, or any alcera [ion of surface eater quality? __ ~ f, Alters clan of grovndva ur characteriatlca? ~_ ~ g. Change Sn the quancl[y of groundwacers, debar through dixecc sddltlona or wlth- dtavals, or through 1nNZtarence wl[h an aquifer? Quallcy? Quanclty? S h. ih• reduecion fn the amount of watei ocher- vine aval3ahle £ar publie vaur supplies? X 1. 'e.xpofure o[ people or property co eater rela ced hazares .,,.~ .. f1ocG1,-y ,,. ..icnu! ~- ~~ Y_ I. ASr Oualiev. Nl11 the proposal have aignlf lean[ ruin cs in: •. Constant or period le sir emiaslons Leos mobile or ind ieecc wureu? ~ Scaclonary eouzeu7 ~ _- % b. Wcerloratlon o! amb lent alt quality end/or lpteetlrMee with the atcaltuwnt of epplleabl• mlr gwllry atandarda? _ % e. Al nration o! lot al or regional cliautle eendirlons, attecting air mev.QSnt, miscu:e az te~apsracu:a? _._ 1L 4. Bioaa Flora. 4111 :he proposal have slgnitleant results in: a, thanae !n cha [beret urla[lea et speelu, fncluding divanlcy, dla ttihucion, oe numbee of any speeies of pl'/at~e~a? _ __ ~ b. Reduet ion of eha numblrt of any un lque, rare or •adangered ap ec lea of plan n? % y_g vqy ar c. Introduecien of nav or disruptive species of plants into an aru? X d. Raduc[SOn !n ehe potential for agricultural production? 2auna. 4111 ch• proposal have significant reaul ca in: a. Change in cha charac uriaclu of spec lea, Intl uding divers icy, dlatrlbuclan, or numb era of any spec tes of animals? X b. Aeduc clon of the n.aabess of any ualque. rare oz endangered apaciu o! animals? ~ c. Znerod,~~!!c-, o~ nav os disruptive apetlaa of animals in co an area, or result Ln a barrier to ch• migration or movement o[ animals? _ _ d. Uecerlouelon or removal of existing fish or vL1d11fa habitat? _ _ ~ 5, pooulacion. 4111 cha proposal have elgnifieant results in: a. Gill the proposal aloe CM loticdon, dia[r!- bucion, dens icy, diveraiey, oz grouch race of the hunan population oL an area? ~ h. 4111 the prapoaal affect axiatSng housing, os create a demand for additional how leg? _ ~ X 6. $ot io-Economic Fa~.n.. u„ ~ . sign Sf !cant Hlulca 10: --- _~~~ i.Jjn,aai iwva a. Change 1a 10ea1 Or raglONl aeOlo-aCOno~dC eharaccasiac lea, iaeluding ecotco~ie oc co®arclal diwniey, tax eau, and Property values? X b• Yill~preleec aoao be equ !:ably diaeributad mat Prolaet banetieiariaa. S.a., Duyere, tax payers oe prol eet owes? ~ _ _ 1. Land Vae and Planning Conaideraeiona. 4111 the proposal have sign if !cane naulea in? -~ ~ s•acantiai ai oration mf cha pros ant or planned land uaa of an area? X ~ e b. A conflict vlch any 6wlgnaclona, ob~tecivaa , policies, or adopted plane of any govarnmancal snc:t:es? - JL c. M f~pacc upon the qulalty or quantity o! existing eonau:pc:ve oe non-eonaumpc ive rlCTeaC SOnal OppO r[U gl[Saa? X ~ [-, IIJI Jyje _ YCS' \~V~: 8. Transoortation. 17111 the proposal have slgnlf Scanc reaul to 16: a. Gnsraclon o[ subs tancial addiclonal vehicular egvemen c? ~~ ~ b. Effec [a on exlaCing scree cs, of demand for ntv scree eonscruetion? __ g c. Etfec ca on axis cing parking facSliciea, or demand for nev parking? __ ~ d. Substantial SIDpau uenn axle ang czanaporta- cion sys cams? ~ e. Alce rat ions to pnaent paceerns of circula- tion or awvsmenc of paopls and/or goods? __ ~ f. Al tetaciom eo or sifeccs an presort and po can cial vacer-borne, rail, msss eranaic or air eratfiot Y.. g. Increases in traffic haaards co motor vehicles, b lcycliats or pedeatriana? ~_ ~ 9. Cultural Resources. Hill the psdpoaal have ugnlf Scanc reauln Sn: a. Adis curbane• to ehs Snesgricy of atchuologlcal, paleoncologlcal, and/or hlaco rical resources? _ __ ~ 10. Health. Saf. -+ ,,. pet wra. Hill the V proposal have slgnificant zeaul to lo: a. Crucion of any health hasard or Doanadal health haurd? T g ~~ b. Eayosure of paopls to pountial Mal[h hasarda? _ __ X e. A risk of eaploalen oe relaau of hasardous eu-etaaps is cM event of as sec idmct _ __ ~ d. Am St7creue in the number of individuals oe species of vector o[ paehenognie organisms or the exposure of peoDl• eo such organlsaut _ -_ ~ e. Incnu• Sn existing no SS• levels? _ _- K f. Exposure of paopls co potentially dangerous nols• levels? _ ~_ ~ g. The tees cion of obi eeclonable odor? w ~ h. M inetsrs• in light or giant ~ X ~_ ~~ vc 11. Aaachaeiea. N111 cha proposal haw signif !cane [uules in: a. 2As oba cruccion oz datradatlon o[ any acanic vista or viw? _ __ Y b. The <rsat Son of an aasehatically offanaivs ai u? X c. A conflict v1 Ch the ob]¢tSVa of dasla nae.d _ or pocsncial aeanlc corridors? 1:. L't 111ttea and Publie aarvitea. W311 the proposal have a significant naafi for naM sysema, or al[erationa co she lellovlag: a. Fl eetzic power? ~ b. Natural or packapd ps? X c. Co®unicacions syataes? ~ X d. Water supply? ~ _ __ X e. vascwacar fac13[t[u? X f. Flood aonerol acruecuru? X g. Solid vast! fac111ciaa? ~ X h. FSCS pro cacrion? _ ~ f. Pol Sc• Pro cattion? ~ .Y. k. Parb or otMs seeraaclowl fatS11t1o? __ g 1. Maineanante of public [ac11[tiea, including [Dada sad Llood eonteol foci! Lola? _ X ^. Othee ~aves~antal aarvicu? _ X 1). Fne rn and Scares Maoureaa. will ehe proposal ha~a ti/nlf leant rasulca in: a. Vu of sub ecantlal or axeaaaiw fuel oc enaegy? _ ~ b. Subs tan clal intreaae Sn dnand upon aafatins sou re as o[ energy? X c. M Sne raase Sn the dmand for davalopnenc of nw wurua of anargy? _ __ ~ d. M Sne raaae or parpecwclan of cha cansunp Lion of non-nnwabla to ma of anargy, vhan tw ib la renwable eourua o f a narLy an available? _ ~ f / ~ ~ ~ ~3iL ~ Y°5 :.1Y3r ti0 e. Subacanclal de9la CSon of any nonrenewable or .urea natural resource? - _ _ ~ 14. Yandaiorro Flndln¢• of 51¢ni Cf canc.. a. Doea the pro}fee hev eh• poeanelal co d•grada ch• quality of ehe enviro,ro•nc, subatan [!ally zeduc• the habiese of fish or vildllfe ap•c1es, cease • fish or wi1d11te pepulatlon co drop Delov self sustaining law•L, threaten ee ellmine c• a plant ar animal eossunity, rsdue• the number or rartrlee eM range of a rata or •ndanpred plant oT enlmal or eliminaee important examples of ehe wlor periods of California history or prebls eory? ~ ~_ ~ 6. Does the pros eec have the potential co aehlav shot[-term, co the dlsedvantage of long-term, environenncal goals? (A short-can lmpeet on the emirenmenc ie one which occurs !e a nletlvely brief, dafini Give period of time while long- urm impse es will endure yell into the future). ~ ~_ ~, c. Doea eM proj etc have SmpacG vhleh an individually limited, but eumula[lve1F eonsiderabl e? ([amulet ivdy eensidete6le means coat ehe ineremeecal et[eers of am individual p:o)•ee aze considerable when viewed !n connection vleh cM etlecta of pace proisen . _^.~ p--...... !acute prof ecta). -~ _- X d. Daea cha project have snvironmencal effeep which will cease wbsemtSal sdveree effects on human beings, etcher diraeely or iedireccly? % Ii. DISCC55IDN CF lTtl2llONf4NTAL ICYALVASLON (S.e.. of atfirmaclve answers eo cha above QueaelMe plus a diecuuioe of prepeead mitigeclon musures). The project wEll be funded by systems development fees. ~I III. DETERMINATION On thebasis of this initial evaluaiton: ^ I find the proposed project LOIILD NOT have a significant effect on the enviror~ment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation mzasures described on an '*.t= =d ~h=^t h= b^ ,tided to the - -~. „~,,,,~,.~ p, ojc DECLARATION WILL BE~PREPARED. n I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the l_...1 environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY E%EMPT per article ~fi30p____, Class ~, Section c of the Californ`ia~- nvironmental Qua ity Act. Date 3 7 9C ' igna C- ~ 7 L"ii~ ~1'~ - r Tt~t ~, eT~ ~~ CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. maguire, airy u,yincc, BY: Dan Janes, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Undergroundin9 of Overhead Utilities for DR 86-13, located north of 9th Street, between Yineyard Avenue and Neil man Avenue, submitted by Messenger Investment Caepany - UR 008 RELOMNEMOATION: It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utility lines on 9th Street, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same Lo record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of DR 86-13, Messenger Investment Company, the developer, was required to underground the overhead utility lines on its protect side of 9th Street. Pursuant to Planning Coawission Resolution No. 87-96, and the conditions of approval of said development, the developer has requested to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City Lo be reimbursed for a portion of the undergrounding costs from the adiacent properties directly benefitting from said undergrounding. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 209-012-17, and 209-013-01 are currently vacant parcels within industrial zoning; therefore, contributions toward the subject undergrounding may became possible at the time of City's conditioning of future developments of said parcels. Assessor's Parcel No. 209-013-02 is currently developed as an industrial building. The development of said parcel took place under DR 88-21, which has contrlhuted to the City mndergroundtng in-lieu fees at the time of its development. inerefore, the reimbursement contribution of said parcel in the amount of 530,214.80 will be paid from the City's undergrounding fund. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 86-13 - UR-008 MARCH 7, 1990 PAGE 2 Assessor's Parcel Nos. 209-012-04, 209-013-36, 209-013-37, 209-013-39, and 209-013-40, are currently developed as light Industrial developments. Undergrounding in-lieu fees have ru)t been contributed to the City by any of said parcels. Thorofnro cootrihutio.^.s tor.•ard the ,,.Lj~,L unucrgroumm~g may become possible at the time of City's conditioning of future redevelopment of said parcels. Assessor's Parcel No. 209-013-27 is currently being developed as Lhe future "City Yard". The development on said parcel, as conditioned by DR ._~-. - ......, vn vi ui,d@r gitiuridi ng in-iieu ,mom for the utility lines on the~~opposite side of 9th Street. The reimbursement contribution of said parcel in the amount of 14,337.20 will be paid from the City's undergrounding fund. The Engineering staff has revlevred the total costs of the undergrounding, and the distribution of the casts as illustrated in 'Exhibit D" of the subfect Reimbursement Agreement. The City has provided 10 days notice prior the date of the Council's meeting to those parceis affected by Lhis agreement. Respectfully, submitted, G i/'„// ~~Y, , ~' ~ ~ ACV ~~ .n ~.-1~.~`~~ RHM:D1: dl~ ~ ~/ Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ( D - l O(~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT EKECUTED ON NARCN 7, 1990 FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF A PORTION OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES LOCATED NORTH OF 9TH sructt_ ntrwttN v1NEYARD AVENUE ANO NELLMAN AVENUE itHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement subaitted by Mosennaa_r Investment Company, as developer of OR 86-13 for tfie undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utilities on the north side of 9th Street, between Vineyard Avenue and Hellman Avenue (UR-0081; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said undergrounding operation; and NHEREAS, the owners of the addoining properties will share in the expense of the undergrounding operation costs as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the MAYor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement Lo record. S-5 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,- _; DATE: March 1, 1990 :, T0: City ramril and rirv wa„a..o. j j FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer - BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities for Development Review 81-55, located westerly of Rochester Avenue, between 8th Street and Arrow I Route, submitted by The Fullmer Company - UR 005 RECOMEMDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utility lines on Rochester Avenue, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign Bald agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of OR 87-55, the developer was required to underground the overhead utility lines on its project side of Rochester Avenue. Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-%, and the condition of approval of sold development, the developer has requested to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City to be reimbursed for a portion of the undergrounding costs from the adlacent properties directly benefiting from said undergrounding. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 229-111-24, 229-251-30 and 229-271-44 are developed as industrial buildings within industrial zoning. Undergrounding in-lieu fees were not paid to the City at the time of said developments. Therefore, contributions toward the subject undergrounding may become possible at the time of City's conditioning of future redevelopment or subdivision of said parcels. Assessor's Darcel No. 229-111-25 is presently develcped as an industrial building (developed under MDR 86-26 ), which has paid to the City an undergrounding in-lieu fee for its frontage on Rochester Avenue. Therefore, the reimbursement contributions for Bald parcel 1n the amount of f13,516.68, corresponding to the undergrounding performed on Rochester Avenue fronting said property, will be paid from the City's Utility Undergrounding fund. CITY COUMCIL STAFF REPORT OR 87-55 - UR-005 MARCH 7, 1990 PAGE TMO The Engineering staff has reviewed and approved the total cost of undergrounding and the distribution of the Costs. The City has provided 10 days notice prior to the date of Council meeting .~ LhJSe parceia airecced by this agreement. Respectf~ submitted, ///~ ~ ~ ~ 1~;~, RIW: : sim Attachment 7 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ - ~ ~f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING REta18URSEAIENT AGRPr•mvNr EXECUTED ON MARCH 7, 1990, FOR UNDERGROUNDIN6 OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES ON ROCHESTER AVENUE, BETNEEN 8TH STREET AND ARRON ROUTE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Retaburseaw!nt AgreeaN:nt submitted by TFC-Rochester, a California General Partnership (by The Fullmer Company, general partner), as developer of DR 87-55 for the undergrounding of overhead utilities (UR 005) on Rochester Avenue, between 8th Street and Arrow Route; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said undergrounding operation; and NHEREAS, the owners of the adfolning properties will share in the expense of the undergrounding operation costs as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF pANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to sign satd Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreement to record. S~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Nil lie Vatbuena, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement fray Janes Banks, Jr., for a single family residence, located at 13181 Yictor{a Street between L L11~allda Ynd la it A~r..rr~ RECOMIENDATIOM: It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. BACKGROUND/ANA!YSIS The developer, Janes Banks, Jr., of 13181 Victoria Street, east of Etiwanda Avenue, requested a butlding permit for a roan addition to his single family residence. Street improvements, including installation of street trees, are required per City Council Ordinance No. 58 for issuance ~s a M,ildinn normit. The street trees are not reautred to be installed at this time per City Council decision on January 17, 1990. Therefore, the developer has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future installation of the street trees on 13181 Victoria Street. A copy of the Agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. Respect X11 submitted, Attachment RHM:NY aim / ~Z v~j d CQO O ~ D U O yam" V RESOLUTION N0. ~O- ~ Q 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY r~oonvncur rnYTpar7 awn I icY aapFFMENT FROM .LAMES BANKS. JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, adopted UretnanCe ND, bFI On FODPUary Z1 19/9, t0 establish requi rement5 for construction of public improvements in con~unctlon with building permit issuance; and NHEREAS, installation of street trees °°tabr,ished ~ a prerequtsite to issuance of a building permit for 13181 Victoria Street has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by James Banks, Jr. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, Californla, does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorises the Mayor and the City C1erHc to slgn same, and directs Lhe City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardf no County, California. ~' - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 1, 1990 ~~ T0: City Council and G1 ty Manager ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspec*_or ` `~ SUBJECT: Rei ease of Bonds RELOMEMDATI011: It is recomgended that City Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the Ctty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 12650 Storm Drain is located on the southwest corner of Canistel Avenue and Deer Canyon Drive. The developer, The Deer Creek Company, was required to bond for the storm drain construction that is located to the east of their tract boundaries. That parcel of land has since been recorded as Tract 13851 and bonded for by Pacific International Developers. The bonding includes storm drain construction. Therefore, LIIO uVllu] ]uUlgl ll.cu V NIG vcm V~c<n ~ ~ r., n.~r ~~"'~ "i ..nA J Vv^MurV ]~~ .:I...... DEVELOPER: The Oeer Creek Company 8480 Utica Avenue Raxho Cucamonga, CA 41730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Storm Drain) 5182,000 Labor and Materials Bond (Stores Drain) S 91,000 Respectfu}3~ submitted, ~, iS~ _. ~~- Attachment RESOLUTION N0. / ~ ~' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r_ir yunun~ m`nur~ i:`L~ ~l°: + r i AIT: LrJ:. ~~iN uw ~X~~ BOND AND ~TNE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND FOR TRACT 12650 STORM DRAIN NNEREAS, the security for the construction of the storm drain 1s no longer required for Tract 12650 since it has been submitted by Tract 13851 and accepted by City Council on January 3, 1990. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Clerk is authorized to release the Faithful Performm~ce Bond and the Labor and Materials Bond. C~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7. 1990 T0: Ctty Councn and city Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 13270 Storm Drain have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amount of f68,600.00, ;14,600.00, f75,800.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amount of (686,000.00, 5146,000.00, and (758,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13270 - located at the rrorthwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes Post Office Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Store Drain: Foothill Store Drain: Elta Stor,t Drain: Church Maintenance Guarantee Bonds (68,000.00 (14,600.00 (75,800.00 Release: Fatthfut Performance Bonds (686,000.00 5146,000.00 (758,000.00 Respectf >SUMattted, ~ r/ HM:SMG:s A nt RESOLUTION N0. 9o-I(~~{ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEiENTS FOG TA1r.T 13970 STnnw nP~,TN nun nw~,rv•+•••^ ___uu TiiE FILI;«, CF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NDRK NNEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13270 Storm Drain have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is reQuired to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: rn. FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 7, 1990 raw rngnril anA f.i tv wanaaer Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Senior Public Morks Inspector~~Jy( Accept the Vineyard Avenue Rehabilitation, between Arrow NuU1R dnd FOOthiii BuuieVard, (:Ontratt ~: B?-?iF improvements as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Enolneer to file a "Notice of Completion". RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept Yineyard Avenue Rehabilitation, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 81-216, improvements as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond Tn the amount of (104,892.60, and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of f104,892.60 six (6) months after the recordatton of said notice, if no claims have been received. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The sub,{ect pro,)ect has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Respe l,y submitted, i ~ i C ~^`--~ C~ s,)m Attachment RESOLUTION N0. /O'/~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY pF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE VINEYARD AVENUE REHABILITATION, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING nr e, u0?!fC fli r/WDI irTnY ifle TYL unov HHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Vineyard Avenue Rehabilitation, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 1, 1990 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Senior Public Norks Inspector 1IJCo( ~' Accept the Hidden Farm Road Culvert, east of Carnelian Street, Contract Na. 89-104, as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "NOttce of Completion" RECOMEMDATION: It is recowaended that City Council accept the Hidden Farm Road Culvert, east of Carnelian Street, Contract No. 89-104, as complete, authorize the City to file a 'Notice of Completion", authorize the release of the Faithful Performm~ce Bond in the amount of f71,888.00, and accept Lhe lOS Maintenance Bond in the amount of 57,472.00 far one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of f3,735.80 and the Labor and Materials Bond 1n the amount of f35,944.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. At so, approve the final contract amount of f14,716.10 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subJect project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is (74,716.10 which includes one contract change order far hydroseeding slopes ad,~acent to the work area for erosion control. The original amount approved by Council was (74,777.39. Respec y itted, RIM: MDL: sd Attachuent RESOLUTION N0. 9D- ~~ lP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CdTY OF RANCHO CUCAIpNOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIDDEN FARM ROAD CULVERT, CONTRACT N0. 89-104, AND ellTunpr7Tyc nr rIL?kG r.F A ruT?CE r .,,,,-....~.;,;: o-;;;; TriE NORK NNEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Hidden Farm Road Culvert, Contract No. 89-104, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the CTty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San 8ernardlno County. ~9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT March 7, 1990 CT ty Council and City Manager Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Senior Public Norks Inspector7J1CQ~ Accept the Intersection of Haven Avenue and 19th Street, Contract No. 89-031, as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" RECONIENDATION: It is recommended that City Council accept the Intersection of Haven Avenue and 19th Street, Contract No. 89-031, as complete, authorize the City to file a "NOt1ce of Completion", authorize the reiease of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (496,045.00, and accept the l0Y Maintenance Bond in the amount of (60,089.43 for one year, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of 529,818.87 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of (496,045.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice 1f ng claims have been recetved. Also, approve the final contract amount of (600.894.30 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subiect protect has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications arni to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is f600,894.30 which includes 5 contract change orders to cover costs due to utility delays and to cover cost Increases due to plan revisions by Caltrans that Included modifications to the traffic signals and ml5cellaneous itess related to Lhe street improvements. The original amount approved by Council was (496,045.00. Respec 'submitted, ~ ~' Attathment RESOLUTION NO. 9O- ~ O A RESOLUTION aF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS cnp roc rurER:EC7I.^"~. M HAYEk AYE1tJE A."C """"~ :`3iri a~ntci Hilo AUTHORIZING THE FILING ~ A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NNEREAS, the construction of public imroveewnke fn. ehn tnte~enr ri nn of Haven Avenue and 19th Street have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and Lhe City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~! ORDINANCE N0. 409 AN ORDI N.AN CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AFiENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOtiGA MUNI Ci'rAL CODE BY AUUliiG A iiEN CHAFT"cR 8.26 ENTITLED "SERVICE CHARGES FOR FALSE ALARMS" AND PROVIDING FOR SERVICE CHARGES TO DEFRAY THE COSTS OF FALSE POLICE ALARMS A. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 8.26 hereby is added to Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read in words and figures, as follows: "Chanter 8.26 "SERVICE CHARGES FOR FALSE ALARMS "Sections: 8.26.010 Definitions. 8.26.020 Response service charge. 8.26.030 Billing. 8.26.040 Enforcement. "8.26.010 Definitions. for the purposes of this Chapter, the following definitions shall apply: "(a) 'Alarm system' shall mean any device designed for the detection of an unauthorized entry on premises or for alerting others of the commission of an untaw ful act, which device, when actuated, emits a sound beyond the business premises or residential unit or dwelling protected by such device or transmits a signal or message to another location. "(b) 'False alarm' shall mean an activated alarm or alarm signal from any alarm system which is responded to within the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, but for which no emergency situation exists or where there is no evidence to indicate that there was an emergency situation as determined by the responding officer. 'Fa ico al,erm' chaii nni irrilde thnco atarmc ar ti va ind ny ov,iraerd inary meteorological, atmospheric, or other conditions or means as determined by said Sheriff's Department. "(c) 'Fiscal year' shall mean the period from and including July 1 of any year to and including June 30 of the following year. "(d) 'Person' shall mean any individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity. 7~- Ordinance No. 409 Page 2 "8.26.020 Res onse service char es. A service charge which is established by resolution of the City Counci of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in order to defray costs incurred in providing law enforcement services in response to a false alarm shall be paid to the City, by each person who possesses premises, for each third and subsequent police response made to those premises geri2 ra led by a fa ise aia n;. uurjuy arty f...^1 ^__.. "8.26.030 8jll ing. The City's Finance Depar Lnent shall cause to he issued a mn nth ly hill for tho :_Inpd id 5r ry jra rhd roes 3CS r:~ed del rin; the billing period and any prior periods. Such bill shall be due and payable within fifteen (15) days after the billing date. "8.26.040 Enforcement. The airount of any service charge shall be deemed a debt to the Ci t- y. ~~action may be commenced in the name of the City in any court of competent jurisdiction for the amount of any unpaid service charges A17 ce rv ice charges shall be deemed delinquent fifteen Q5) days after they are due and payable." SECTION 2: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SEC LION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation y:: .u .u. :j ...i , w~~~..~u , uiv .. i~~.v~u u.... ~n gyn.. v tj v~ Rancho Cucamonga, California. 73 March 7, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT cu~nfon, 09 LL ~i Q F~~I ~Z u` a ~a la , TG: Mayor and Members of the City Council FR Did: Jei ry Groot. Building Official BY: Carlos H. Silvia Sr., Rehabilitation Specialist SUBJECT: SEISMIC MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the accompanying Ordinance as a further step in identifying and mitigating seismic hazards from unreinforced masonry buildings within the City. II. BACKGROUND: California State Senate Bill 547, Unreinforced Masonry Law, was enacted in 1986. It was the first measure passed in the "California At Risk Program" in preparation for future earthquakes. It requires that local jurisdictions develop a program to address all potentially hazardous unreinforced masonry buildings (URM's). The bill requires a jurisdiction to accomplish three goals: 1. Identify all "potentially hazardous unreinforced masonry" buildings. 2. Establish a mitigation program to address the hazards these buildings impose, which may include retrofitting, lowering of occupancy levels or demoii lion. 3. Submit the findings and the mitigation program to the Seismic Safety Commission. Although the law required us to establish a program, by January 1, 1990, specifications for the program were not defined by the statute. As a result Building and Safety staff was unaware that the proposed mitigation plan was ,_ subjeui iu GalifGrii id Eiir7i Ginn ei,tai yuaiity n~ until just prior to the January 1st deadline. ~As~a~result a finalized draft acceptable under CEQA and to the Historical Preservation Commission, has been delayed till now. The accompanying ordinance includes the results of environmental consideration and the HPC and is hereby presented to the City Council for consideration. 7 3 to ff Report: Seismic Mitigation Program Page 2 March 1, 1990 The State Seismic Safety Commission recommends that aurtsdtcttons develop a mitigation program based on individual city needs. Notification to affected property owners that their building has been identified as "potentially hazardous unreinforced masonry" is the only specific provision of the law. The remainder of the program is left Lc ,judgement of local jurisdictions to determine what should be necessary to effectively increase life safety in the event of earthquake. This flexibility gives the city the opportunity to develop the most effective plan that will benefit the community. Our p ro DOSaI is based upon a model orainance included in "Guidebook to Identify and Mitigate Seismic Nazards in Buildings" published by the State Seismic Safety Commission, but modified to a more realistic timetable consistent with the number of structures involved. tII. ANALYSIS: Building Division Staff has worked with the Planning Department and the Historical Preservation Commission in developing the accompanying list of potentially hazardous unreinforced masonry buildings in Rancho Cucamonga and an ordi name that will set the mitigation efforts in motion, The compilation is the result of field research and examination of County Assescnrs rat nrdc and field curve v5. In addition, a research report was commissioned by the Building and Safety Division to enable the Historical Presera va ti on Commission to finalize the historical significance of those Sdentified structures not previously categorized, A total of 21 buildings have been identified as potentially hazardous. These buildings were further categorized, based upon individual historical significance of the building, by the Historical Preservation Commission, URM bu ildfngs within Rancho Cucamonga are scattered throughout the City, with the majority of these buildings having low to moderate occupancy levels. Thus the threat to life in an earthquake is not extremely urgent at this time, Moaever, hazards do exist and the adop*_idn of a seismic mitigation program will provide the City the opportunity to improve its huilding stock and improve life safety as welt as complying with the State law. 75 Staff Report: Seismic Mitigation Program Page 3 March 7. 1990 As a means of encouraging correction, State lawmakers have preliminarily established financial programs to encourage the cooperation of building owners. City Council adoption of 5hn miti~aljnn prAinarro will oStaAli,h the „_ oggary vehicle for owners to apply for bond financing asrit becomes available for seismic retrofit. Also a number of the incentive programs proposed as a part of the environmental assessment would make funding available thru the City. The proposed seismic mitigation program is based upon several currently in use in other cities (Los Angeles, Long Beach, etc.) and as outlined in the Seismic Safety Commissions Guidebook. The time frame for compliance has been modified to reduce the time for full compliance, from 7 to 3 years, which staff believes is adequate considering the limited number of buildings affected. Our proposal would also provide for an extension of an additional year by the Building Official under extenuatfng circumstances. The program, as proposed, is intended to improve life safety significantly over retention of buildings in their current conditions, however, it will not necessarily bring them to current code standards nor guarantee their ~.~s - ui nyuu..... a pu~Yo..., .. ,.i ..y~..m is to reduce likelihood of death and injury in seismic disaster. Following is an overview of the proposed seismic mitigation programs: The goal of the program is to reduce the risk of death or injury from ground shaking on ORM buildings by improving their structural resistance. It establishes a minimum level of seismic resistance for unreinforced masonry buildings built before building codes were prevalent. It also provides systematic standards for notification to owners, for classification of those buildings based on their present use and for ornrriaiinn of ctaruc Wi:n inn_ rnu_nty rornrdcr Further, structural standards and time periods for compliance are included. 7 (p Staff Report: Seismic Mitigation Program Page 4 March 1, 1990 The initial step in the program requires tht owners obtain a structural analysis of their 6uildin9. Buildings are then required to be Strengthened or demolished at the owner's option if the analysis GcLcinii l-- ~efiC ierit i2i. ReYiEw rE yuiiement5 Ly the Historical Preservation Commission, before revision or demolition, are also specified for buildings determined to have historical significance. Once historical significance is determined, permits may be issued to demolish or repair the structures. If the repair alternate is selected, owners then have 3 years from notification to complete repair work. The proposal allows use of the Uniform Code For Building Conservation to be utilized as a means of encouraging the continued use of existing structures. We are also mandated to utilize the State Historic Buildings Code for qualified structures, which provides guidelines for carrying out preservation of existing historical buildings yet maintains reasonable levels of life safety. The cost of retrofitting URM's will vary dependent upon the mitigation program selected Dy the owner. using the construction Cost Chart referenced in the Seismic Safety Commissions Guidebook, and figures derived from adjacent communities, costs to retrofit single story buildings vary from $2.50 to $22.00 per square foot of floor area dependent upon the condition of the structure and repair methods utilized. SUMMARY: City Council adoption of the accompanying ordinance will allow for reduction of hazardous structures and their inherent danger to occupants and surrounding properties. The ordinance is consistent With recommendations by the Seismic Safe t_v Commission and meets the intent of Senate 0111 54%. It I1keWlse provides a neCeSSary vehicle t6 apply for state funding for seismic retrofit as it becomes available. The ordinance is structured ro provide optional use of the Uniform Code For Building Conservation, and the State 77 Staff Report: Seismic Mitigation Program Page 5 March 7, 1990 Historic Buildings Code, which will also allow for retention, to the greatest extent reasonably possible, historically significant buildings subject to the law. ~~li ril'r l~.'.~t~ ~....~. ~1Yd ~f]~C ~ ft.^.YlS1PA nt fl, /~ pending ordina nce,~its impact, and this hearing. Reinforcing Lhe relatively few buildings in the City that are affected by this ordinance will provide a limited degree of assurance that life and property losses will be reduced in event of a significant earthquake. Respectfully Submitted, ~~ i Je rAS'y R. Grant. 6u' ding Official JRG:11 7V ORDINANCE N0. ~7 AN OROINANFF nF Tuc rrrY rnnurn nr CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 15 rOF ,THE MUN IC[PAL CODE BY ADCING CHAPTER 42 REGARDING EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN UNRE IN FORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ;i. nr.~iiHLa (.) The California State Legislature enacted the Un reinforced Masonry Building Law (Chapter 250, Statutes of 1986; 58541--A1 quilt; Dayn;Omcn• - $cGtiari ^^15 ~, 52^y.) ~^y;:j ;•,^,y ell _••c Ai~f inrc in Sai<mir Zone 4 to identify and develop a hazard mitigation program for all types of potentially hazardous buildings. (ii) The adoption of this ordinance provides the necessary vehicle to comply with state regulations. (iii) The proposed ordinance and the Uniform Code for Building Conservation are acceptable programs utilized in other cities and referenced in the "Seismic Safety Commission's" Guide Book. (iv) This Ordinance, while protecting the health and welfare of the Citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, also encou ra 9es the preservation of historic buildings as evidenced by reference to the State Historical Building Code, the provision of incentives and by requiring additional review prior to demolition for such 6uil dings. (v) A duly noticed public hearing, as required by California Government Cade, has been conducted and concluded prior to the adoption of this ordinance. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE Now, Therefore, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTION I, In all respects as set forth in the Recitals. Part A, of tlll~ Urd I11 G 11C C. SECTION 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance wf th the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 7q SECTION 3. Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Entitled Bu ildinas and Construction, of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended, provided that said amendment shall not apply to or excuse any violation Lhe reof occurring prior to the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4. Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 15.42 to read, in words and figures, as follows: Chd ptei Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Unreinforced Masonry Buildings Sections 15.42.010 Added - - Purpose 15.42.020 Added - - Scope 15.42.030 Added - - Definitions 15.42.040 Added - - Rating Classi fication5 15.42.050 Added - - General Requirements 15,42.060 Added - - Administration 17,42.070 Added - - Historic Buildings 15.42.080 Added - - Rnalysis and Design 15.42.090 Added - - Materials of Construction 15.42.100 Added - - information Required on Plans 15.42.010 Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to promote public safety and welfare by reducing the risk of death or injury that may result from the effects of earthquakes on unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings constructed before 1946. Such buildings have been widely recognized as sustaining life-hazardous damage as a result of partial or complete collapse during past moderate to strong earthquakes. The provisions of this Chapter are minimum standards for structural seismic resistance established primarily to reduce the risk of life loss or injury and will not necessarily prevent loss of life or injury or prevent earthquake damage to an existing building which complies with these standards. This Chapter shall not require existing electrical, plumbing, mechanical or fire safety systems to be altered unless they constitute a hazard to It fe or property. ~~ ~ This Chapter provides procedures and standards for identification and classification of unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings based on their present use. Priorities, time periods and standards are also established a nder which these buildings are required to be structurally analyzed and anchored. Whe rP the anal vcic An,nnm: noe a.. c: ~: ,.n~:..~ h6:e rF a_pf n. _ __ the building to be strengthened or demolished. However, the provisions of this Chapter do not preclude the preservation of historic buildings. In fact, preservation of historic buildings is encouraged through the permissive use of appitca ble portions of the State Historical Building Code (SHBC ), established under Part 8, Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. In addition, the City will pursue incentives to assist property owners in obtaining aid offered by Federal, State and local agencies. These incentives are further elaborated on in cPrrjnn 15.42.O70.F, 15.42.020 Scope. The provisions of the Chapter shall apply to all buildings constructed or under construction prior to 1946, or for which a building permit was issued prior to 1946, which on the effective date of this ordinance have unreinforced bearing walls as defined herein. EXCEPTION: This Chapter shall not apply to detached one or two family dwellings and detached apartment houses containing less than 5 dwelling units and used solely for residential purposes. 15.42.030 Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, the applicable definitions in ec tions 2302 and 2312, Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition (UBL, 1988 Edition) and the following shall apply: Crosswall s: Interior walls of masonry or wood frame construction with surface finish of wood lath and plaster, minimum 1/2 inch thick gypsum wallboard or solid horizontal wood sheathing. In order to be considered as a cross wall within the intent of this Chapter, the cross walls shall be spaced at not more than 40 feet apart in each story, and shall be full story height with a minimum length of one and one-half times the story height. High Risk Bu ild inq: Any building having an occupant load of 100 occupants or more as determined 6y Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition. E%CEPTiON: Buildings meeting either or both of the following c rtteria need not be classified as high risk buildings. Any building having exterior wails braced with Grosswaiis as defined above. 2. Any 6ufldfng used for its intended purpose, as determined by the Building Official, for less than 20 hours per week. Historical Bufldina: Any building designated as an historical building by an appropriate Federal, or State Agency, or as a landmark by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and any building on a local, state, or national inventory of historic resources. V ~ Medium Risk Building: Any building having an occupant load of more than 20, but less than 100, as determined by Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition. Low Risk 9uilding: Any building having an occupant load of less than ants - ua ce r.... r~aa ..., ou:.uu~: ''°C .°°° .~ Un reinforced Masonry Bearing Nail: A masonry wall having all of the following characteristics: .. Providing vertical support for a floor or root. 2. Having a total superimposed load of over 100 pounds per linear foot. 3. Having reinforcing steel less than 50 percent of that required by Section 2407 (h) 48, UBC, 1988 Edition. 15.42.040 Rating Classifications. Buildings subject to this chapter shall be classified by the Building Official as High Risk, Medium Risk, or Low Risk Buildings as defined herein. The total occupant load of the entire building as determined by Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition, shall be used to determine the rating classification. EXCEPTIONS: 1. For the ou roose of this Cha oter, portions of buildings constructed to act independently when resisting seismic forces may be placed in separate rating classifications. z. ine uuiia rog urfaciai may allow one use or a ven n eq occupancy load rather than the occupancy load specified in Section 3302, UBC, 1988 Edition in determining the rating classification. 15.42.050 General Re ui rements. The owner of each building within the scope of the Chapter shat cause a structural analysis to be made of the building by a civil or structural engineer or architect licensed by the State of California; and if the building does not meet the minimum earthquake standards specified in this Chapter, the owner shall cause it to be structurally altered to conform to such standards; or cause the building to be demolished. A. Service of Order. The City shall have up to 270 days in which to serve the order as outlined in Section 15,42.060. B. Loapliance. Upon service of the Order, the owner of a building, identified within the scope of this Chapter, shall comply with one of the following requirements: 1. within 270 days after the service of the order, a structural analysis shall be submitted Lo the Building Official for review, Such analysis shall demonstrate that the building meets the minimum requirements of this Chapter; or 4 2. Within 270 days after the service of the order, the structural analysis and plans for the proposed structural alterations of the building necessary to comply with the minimum r•equi rements of this Chapter shall be submitted; or ,,. h;n ~:O days otter i.he service or ine order, a letter or intention to demolish the building shall be submitted. Any proposed demolition of a historical building, as defined in Section 15.42.030, must first undergo landmark application review to determine the historical merit of the structure. in adGriron to review for landmark status, the Histar it Preservation Conmissi on shall determine the need for and required contents of a feasibility study to examine po ssi 6le alternatives Lo demolition which may include a cost) benefit analysis, reconstrur.tion alternatives, relocation feasibility or other similar analysis determined necessary by the Commission. The study shall he completed by a City hired consultant, but fi ra nted by the aopl ica nt, and shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director or his designee and reported on to the Historic Preservation Conmissi on. Building Permit. After plans or letter of intention to demolish are submitted and approved by the Building Official, the owner shall obtain a building permit, and commence and complete the required construction or demolition within the time limits set forth below. These time limits shall begin to run from Lhe date the order is served in accordance with Section 15.42.060 (A) and (B). 1. Ine property owner snail have t year from the date the order is served td obtain a building permit to complete structural alterations or building demolition. 2. The property owner shall have a total of 3 years from date the order is served to complete construction of any structural alterations. E%CEPTION: The Building Official may allow an extension of time, for obtaining a building permit or demonstrating compliance with this Chapter as set forth in Section 15.42.050, of up to an additional one year, if it is demonstrated that there is nm immediate hazard to life safety and that there will be no adverse impact upon adjacent properties. Any further re yuest far extensions of time shall be accomplished in the manner set forth in Section 15,42.O60.C for appeals. 15.42,060 Administration. A. Service Of Order. The Building Official shall issue an order, as provided in Subsection (B) below, to the owner of each building within the scope of this Chapter. Service of the order shall not occur until such time that the City Planner and Building Official shall determine that the incentive programs, referenced in Sec :ion 15.42, O70.F, are in place and operational, but shall be no longer than 270 days from the date of enaction of the Ordinance. Contents Of Urder, i ne oraer sna i l oe m n, .....y " a; l o~ served either personally or by certified or re gi ste red~mail upon the owner as shown on the last equalized assessment, and upon the person, if any, in apparent charge or control of the building. The order shall specify that the building has been determined by the Building Official to be within the scope of this Chapter and, therefore, is required to meet the minimum seismic standards of this Chapter. The order shall specify the rating classification of the building and shall be accompanied by an informational pamphlet, as referenced in Section 15,42.070. F, which shall also include a copy of Section 15.42.050 and shall include alternatives and time limits for compliance. C. Appeal Order. The owner or person in charge or control of the building may appeal the Building Official's determination that the building is within the scope of this Chapter to the City Council. Such appeal shall be filed with the Building Official within 30 days from the service date of the order of the Building Official. Any such appeal shall be scheduled for hearing before the City Council, not later than 60 days after the date that the appeal is fit ed. Such appeal shall be made in writing upon appropriate forms provided therefor 6y the Building Official, aid the grounds for appeal and the justification thereof shall be stated clearly and concisely. Each appeal snail be accompanied by a filing fee as determined Dy City Council Resolution. D. Recordation. At the time that the Building Official serves the aforementioned order, the Building Official shall file with the Office of the County Recorder a certificate stating that the subject building is within the scope of Title 15, Chapter 15.42, "Earthquake Ma za rd Reduction in Unreinforced Masonry Buildings"--of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The certificate shall also state that the owner thereof has been ordered to structurally analyze the building and to structurally alter it or demolish it where compliance with Chapter 15.42 is not exhibited. If the bull ding is either demolished, found not Lo be within the sGU pe of iiiii Cha yie r, or is found to be strut to rally ca pabie of resisting minimum seismic forces required by this Chapter as a result of structural aitera ti ons or an analysis, the Building Official shall file with the Office of the County Recorder a certificate terminating the status of the subject building as being classified within the scope of Title 15, Chapter 15.42-- "Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Unreinforced Masonry Buildings" of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. V 1 "~ Enforcement. If the owner or other person in charge or control of the subject building fails to comply with any order issued by the Building Official pursuant to this Chapter within any of the time limits set forth in Section 15.42.050, the 8uildin9 Official shall order that the entire building 6e vacated and _ ~y ____ _ _ _ _ ~ ,.ai `vecl complied with.u ~If comp', ~i ante ~w i~th such order ~Lo vacate has not been accomplished within 90 days after the date the building has been ordered vacated or such additional time as may have been granted by the City Council, the Building Official may order its demolition or abatement in accordance with the provisions of the procedure sec for ih .n ine uniform i.ude fur noa cement of Dangerous Buildings as adopted by Chapter 28 of this Title. 15.42,070 Historical Buildinos A. Historic Preservation Revier. Any proposal for the structural alteration or demolition of an historical building, as defined herein, shall require review by the Historic P•e servo ti on Commission prior to issuance of any building or demolition permits. 8. Scope. The Commission shall review all plans, proposed structural revisions and demolitions for pre servo ticn of historic character, quality of design and aesthetic considerations, review fee waiver requests and demolition feasibility studies and, make reaommenda ti ons to the City Council regarding potential designation. C. Additional Information. Addf tf onal architectural elevations and e etatls may oe requested in order to provide clarification in review of the proposed revisions. D. General. The standards and procedures esta 6lished by this Chapter shall apply in all respects to an historical building except that as a means tp preserve original architectural elements and facilitate restoration, an historical buildf ng may, in addition, comply with the special provisions set forth in this Section. E. Unburned Clay Masonry or lldobe. Existing or re-erected walls of adobe construction shall conform to the following: Unreinforced adobe masonry walls shall not exceed a height or length to thickness ratio of 5, for exterior bearing walls and Gluit be provided with a reinforced bend beam ai the top, interconnecting all walls. The bond beam shall have a minimum depth of 6 inches. The bond beam may have a width equal to the width of wall less 8 inches, provided the resulting width is not less than 8 inches. Minimum wall thickness shall be 18 inches for exterior bearing walls and 10 inches for adobe partitions. 2. Foundation footings shall be reinforced concrete under newly reconstructed walls and shall be not less than 50 percent wider Lhan the wall above, soil conditions permitting. 3. New or existing unsta bil ized brick and adobe brick masonry shall have an average compressive strength of 225 pounds per square inch when testetl in accordance with AaIM des i9nan on C67. One sample out of five may have a compressive strength of not less than 188 pounds per square inch. Unsta bilized brick may be used where existing bricks are unsta bii ized and she re the baild ing is rut su sceptibie W fiooLiny cundi lions or direct expose re. Adobe may be allowed a maximum value of 3 pounds Der square inch i'or sneer with nv {,~..i aese ,o, lateral farces. 4. Mortar may be of the same soil composition and stabilization as the brick in lieu of cement mortar. 5. Nominal tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may be neglected if the wall meet thicknesses requirements and shear values allowed by this subsection. 6. Allowable stresses far archaic materials not specified in the UBC, 1988 Edition, shall be based on substantiating research data or engineering judgement subject to the Building Official's approval. 7. Alternative materials, design or methods of construction may be considered as set forth in Section 105 of the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edi tton. In addition, when a request iii on ai te, noiive prupm eu ueaiyn, ma ieriai ur me emu ui construction is being considered, the Building Official may file written request for opinion to the State Historical Building Code Advisory Baa rd for its consideration, advice or findings in accordance with the SHBC. F. Incentives. In order to encourage the preservation of historic structures, the following incentive programs are to be explored and information made available to property owners with buildings subject to the provis tons of this Chapter. This list does not preclude the use of alternatives not identified here. The Planning Division shall develop an informational pamphlet, which shall be sent to property owners of buildings identified subject, to the provisions of this Cha yrer, which ^haii b2 ' 'icd ui rentiy with the Gi dei specified in Section 15 ~42.060.A~ The pamphlet shall explain the basic provisions of SB 547 and this Ordinance and shall outline the various options and incentives available to property owners including financial assistance and design consultation. ~r ,L The City shall provide funds which may be used toward design consultation for owners of historic structures. The City has funds which may be available for this use through the Community Development 81 ock Grant (C DBG) program and through the Historic Preservation section of the Planning Division budget. Nithin 6 months from the effective date the Ordinance, program guiaelines snail oe oeveiopea ror use or these funds. 3. Asa majority of the historic unreinforced masonry buildings are within the Redevelopment Project Area, available funds may be used toward historic rehabilitation. The City shall investigate the possibility for setting up a local loan program for Seismic rehabilitation as referenced in the California Health 6 Safety Code Sections 55000 through 55009. An analysis and determination of the feasibility for setting uD the program shall be made within 6 months from the date of enaction of the Ordinance. if it is determined that a program is to he developed, Lh en the criteria, guidelines and ena 6l ing legislation shall be developed within 270 days from the effective date of the Ordinance. 5. Upon request, the City shall provide information about the Mills Act .,~ owners of historica', buildings. The Nills Act allows property tax benefits in exchange for preservation of a huilding. The Historic Preservation Cammissi on may recommend to the City Council waiving applicable building permit, plan check, design review, land use and landmark alteration fees for historic structures which are designated local landmarks, or for those structures determined to be significant through the landmark review process. In review of the request, the Historic Preservation Commission shall give consideration to the architectural and historical merit of the proposed seismic retrofit and/or structural alteration. 7. Additional financing may be available through State and Federal agencies and may include: a. Tax credits for reha6ilita ti on which are ova ila ble under the 19B@ Tax Act. To be eligible for the hi Sher 201 historic building tax credits, the construction documents must be approved by the State Historic Preservation Office and National Park Service. b. Funding for Seizmit retrofit may also be available through the Small Business Administration (SBA), and may be used for engtnaering, planning, permits and construction costs. Borrowers shall include businesses that meet the agency's size standard and eligibility requirements. g~ 15.42.080 Anal vsis and Oesicn. A. General. Every structure within the scope of this Chapter shall be analyzed and constructed to resist minimum total lateral seismic forces assumed to alt nonconcurrently in the direction of each of the main axes of the structure in - ..... .~ _.. ~ eyus:.VUiI: vsanccw (FORMULA III-1) The value of E'C_g need not exceed the values set forth in Table No. III-A based on the seismic zone as determined by the O~iS~Lig CWr. T've value or a snail be the value specified in Table No. III-B. The i factor shall be as spetifi ed in Table No. III-C. The value of W shall be as set forth in the Building Code, 1988 Edition. B. Lateral Forces on Ele~ents of Structures. Parts or portions of structures shall be analyzed and designed for lateral loads in accordance with Subsection (A) above and Chapter 23, UBC, 1968 Edition, but not less than the value from the following equation: lp~alCp Sl/p (FORMULA III-2) For the provisions of this Su bs ec ticn, the prcd utt of rs need not exceed the values as set forth in Table No. III-D. The value of c need not exceed the values as set forth in Table No. I14-M. The value of w shall be as set fnrtn ;n tna Um form Building Code, 1988 Editil$n. EE%C EPTI ON: Un reinforc ed masonry walls may be analyzed in accordance with Section 15.42,090. C. Anchorage and Interconnection. Anchorage and interconnection of all parts, portions and elements of the structure shall be analyzed and designed for lateral forces in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition and the equations ~;x yp (Formula III-2) as modified by Table No. III-0. s Mi4limuM anchorage of masonry walls to each floor or roof shall resist a minimum force of 200 pounds per linear foot acting normal to the wall at the Level of the floor or roof. D. level of Required Repair Alterations and repairs required to meet the provisions of this Chapter shall comply with all other applicable requirements of the UBC, 1988 Edition, unless s Decifically provided for in this Chapter. E. Required Analysis. Except as modified below, the analysis and design relating to the structural alteration of existing structures within the scope of this Chapter shall be in accordance with the analysis specified in Chapter 23, UBC, 1988 Edition. I. Continuous Stress Path. A complete, continuous stress path from every part or portion of the structure to the ground shall be provided for the required horizontal forces. 2. Positive Connections. Ali parts, portions ar elements of the structure shall be interconnected by positive means. F. Mal ysis Procedure. Stresses in materials and existing construction utilized to transfer seismic forces from the ground to parts or portions of the ;fracture shall confo^.n to those permitted by the UBC, 1988 Edition, and those materials and types of construction specified in Section ie .4e.v50. Ha to rials and connectors used for interconnection of parts and portions of the structure shall conform to the UBC, 1988 Edition, Except as modified herein, un reinforced masonry walls shalt be analyzed as specified in Sections 2416, 2418, and 2419 of the UBC, 1988 Edition, to withstand all vertical loads as specified in Chapter 23, UBC, 1988 Editi an, in addition to the seismic forces required by this Cha Dter. No allowable tension stress will be permitted in unreinforced masonry walls. Malls not capable of resisting the required design forces specified in this Chapter shall be strengthened or shall be removed or re pi ac ed. E%CEPTIONS: 1, Unreinforced masonry walls may be analyzed in accordance with Section 15.42.090. 2, Unreinforced masonry walls which carry no design loads other than its own weight may be considered as veneer if they are adequately anchored to new supporting elements. 3, The 50 Dercent increase in the seismic force factor for shear walls as specified in Table No. 24-H of the UBC, 1988 Edition, may be omitted in the computation of seismfc loads to existing shear walls. G. Ca~binatton of Yertiul and Seissdc Forces. R11 new materials introduced into the structure to meet the requirements of this u._~ a tC .,...bi nnA mrhirai and horizontal Sec ii on whicii are Su oa ~.. ~2v ..,..~~ forces shall comDty with Section 104(b) of the UBC, 1988 Edition, except as follows: Stresses in existing lateral force resisting elements due to a combination of dead loads plus live toads plus seismfc toads may be tncreesed 100 percent over allowable working stresses specified in the Uniform Code, 1988 Edition, however, shall not exceed those permitted by Section 15.42.090. ~' 2. Stresses in members due only to seismic and dead loads shall not exceed the values permitted by Section 2303(d) of Lhe UBC, 1988 Edition. Calculated tensile fiber stress may 6e reduced by the full direct stress due to vertical dead loads. 15,42.090 Materials of Construction. All materials permitted by the UBC, 1988 Edition, including their appropriate allowable stresses and existing configurations of materials specified herein may be utilized to meet the requirements of this Chapter. A. Existing Materials. In addition to the materials permitted by the Uniform Building Code existing configurations of materials specified in this section may be utilized as outlined below. 1. Unre inforced Masonry Walls. a. Un reinfo rced masonry walls analyzed in accordance with this Section may provide vertical support for roof and floor construction and resistance to lateral loads. The bonding of such walls shall 6e specified in Section 2312(b) of the UBC, 1988 Edition. Tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may be neglected if the wall does not exceed the height or length to thickness ratio and the in-plane shear stresses due to seismic loads as set forth in Table No's. I[1-F and IIt-I. 1. R Lne Nal I Ile lgnV N111. FIIC ~! ratlU exceeua 1110 lpellllCd limits, the wall may be supported by vertical bracing members designed in accordance with Section 15.42.080. The deflection of such bracing member at design loads shall not exceed one-tenth of the wall thickness. E%CEPTION: The wall may 6e supported by flexible vertical bracing members designed in accordance with Section 15.42.080 (B) if the deflection at design loads is not less than one-quarter nor more than one-third of the wall thickness. All vertical bracing members shall be attached to floor and roof construction for their design loads independently of required wall anchors. Horizontal J pa11119 al Ye!'t ll.al brdt'ing IIIeI11YC!'] )hall IIVI eT1.CCd one-half the unsupported height of the wall nor ten feet. d. The wall height may be measured vertically to bracing elements other than a floor or roof. Spacing of the bracing elements and watt anchors shall not exceed six feet. Bracing elements shall be detailed to minimfze the horizontal displacement of the wall by components of vertical displacements of the floor or roof. -s g0 e. All un reinforced masonry walls utilized to carry vertical loads and seismic forces parallel and perpendicular to the wall plane shall be Les led as specified in this Subsection. i. All masonry nyal;ry ~!;~11 aquai or exceed the minimum standards established herein or shall be removed and replaced by new materials. Alternate methods of Le sting may be approved by the Building Official. The quality of mortar in all masonry wa'.'.s shall be determined by perfan ing ir.-place shear tests or by testing eight-inc it uinine Cc. cores. Alternative methods of testing may be approved by the Building Official. Nothing shall prevent pointing with mortar of all the masonry wall joints before the tests are first made. Prior to any pointing the mortar joints must be raked and cleaned to remove loose and deteriorated mortar. Mortar for pointing shall be type S or N except masonry cements shall not be used. All preparation and mortar pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a Registered Deputy Building Inspector. At the conclusion of the inspection, the insDec for shall submit a written report to the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the seismic analysis of the building setting forth the result of the work inspected. Such report shall be submitted to the Building Official for aDDroval as part of the structural analysis. All testing shall be ya i ino~ as w,aanw wii.ii i.im ,eyuirenrcuis specified in this suhsec Lion 6y a testing agency a oproved 6y the Building Official. An accurate record of all such tests and their location in the building shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval as part of the structural analysis. ii. The minimum number of tests shall be two per wall or line of wall elements resisting a common force, or 1 per 1500 square feet of wall surface, With a minimum of eight tests in any case. The exact test or core loco Lion shall be determined at the building site by the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the seismic analysts of rhn h,~51 d:nS, ,~Fj o.t to appr .al of the 8uildi.. ~~4 Official. iii. The bed joints of the outer wythe of the masonry a hall be tested in shear by laterally displacing a single brick relative to the adjacent bricks in that wythe. The opposite head joint of the brick to De tested shall be removed and cleaned prior to testing. The minimum quality mortar in 80 percent -~ of the shear tests shat'. not be less than the total of 30 psi plus the axial stress in the wall at the point of the test. The shear stress shall be based on the gross area of both bed joints and shall be that at which movement of the brick is first ebccryaA, iv. A minimum number of mortar test specimens equal to the number of required cores shall be prepared from the cores and tested as specified herein. Tne mortar joint of ine outer wytne of the masonry rore shalt be tested in shear by Dl acing the circular core section in a compression testing machine with the mortar bed joint rotated 15 degrees from the axis of the applied load. The mortar joint tested in shear shall have an average ultimate stress of 20 psi based on the gross area. The average shall be obtained from the total number of cores made. 1f test specimens cannot be made from cores taken then the shear value shall be reported as zero. 2. Existing material configurations including wood shear walls utilized in said configurations may be used as part of the lateral load resisting system, provided that the stresses in these materials do not exceed the values shown in Table No. III-G. Strengthening Of Ezi st ing Materials. New materials including wood shear wa 175 may be utilized to strengthen portions of the exisn ng seismic resisting system in the aescn oed configurations provided that the stresses do not exceed the values shown in Table No. 11I-N. Alternate Materials. Alternate materials, designs and methods of construction may be approved by the Building Official in accordance with the provisions of Section 105, UBC, 1988 Edition. Testing of Shear Bolts. One-fourth of alt new shear bolts and dowels embedded in un re inforceJ masonry walls shall be tested by a Re gistere6 Oe puty Building Inspector using a torque caiibra ted wrench to the following minimum torques: 1/2" diameter bolts or dowels = 40 foot-ibs. 5/B" diameter bolts or dowels 50 foot-tbs. 3/4" diameter bolts or dowels 60 foot-lbs. No bolts exceeding 3/4" shall be used. All nuts shall be installed over malleable iron or plate washers when bearing on wood and heavy cut washers when bearing an steel. -t- g'~ G. Deter>.i nation of Allara ble Stresses for Design Methods Based on Test Results. Allowa hle stresses for design methods based on test results shall 6e as follows: 1. Design seismic in-plane shear stresses shall be substantiated by tests performed a; specified in Section +~ ~+ nqn o„r;,.,, <rr>ccnc eh all be related to test results obtained in accordance with Table No. III-I. Intermediate values between 3 and 10 psi may be interpolated. ... Oompre;;ior ;tresses for un rzinforczd .aa soary having ; minimum design shear value of 3 PSI shall not exceed 100 nct 3. Design tension values for unre inforced masonry shall not he permitted. H. Anchor Tests. Five percent of the existing rod anchors utilized as all or part of the required wall anchors shall be tested in pullout by an approved testing laboratory. The minimum number tested shall be four per floor, with two tests at walls with joists parallel to the wall. The test apparatus shall be supported on the masonry wall at a minimum distance of the wall thickness from the anchor tested. The rod anchor shall be given a preload of 300 lbs. prior to establishing a datum for recording elongation. The tension test load reported shall be recorded at one-eighth inch relative movement of the anchor and the adjacent masonry surface. Results of all tests shall be reported, The report shall include the test results as related to the wall thickness and joint orientation. The allowable IIIC .VIVO VI LVC C/.I)L Illy YIILIIVI] )11011 UC IVI LY pCI LC1IL of~ the average of those tested anchors having the same wall thickness and joist orientation. Qualification tests for devices used for wall anchorage shall be tested with the entire tension load carried on the enlarged head at the exterior face of the wall. Bond on the part of the device between the enlarged head and the interior wall face shall be eliminated for the qualification tests. The resistance value assigned the device shall 6e twenty percent of the average of the ultimate loads. 15.42.100 Information Reouired on Plans. A. feneral. in addition to the seismic analysis required elsewhere LF: Dh.°i pl~dn LFe l: ~ ^d 2ngi ai 'lit tcct v}ii'ILiic for the seismic anal ysis^of the bu illding shall determine and include the information required by this Section on the approved plans as follows. All unreinforced masonry walls shall be anchored at the roof level by tension bolts through the wall as specified in Table No. lI[-N, or by approved equivalent at a maximum anchor spacing of six feet. -'-g3 All un reinforced masonry walls shalt be anchored at all floors with tension bolts through the wall or by existing rod anchors at a maximum anchor spacing of six feet. All existing rod anchors shall be secured to the joists to develop the required forces. The Building Official may require testing to verify the adequacy of the embedded ends of existing rod an_c ho rs. Tests when required shad conform 'vu Set ilvn u.Ya.Jiv ~n~. When access to the exterior face of the masonry wall is pr :cnt^d by praxi ty of exist ng b°`ld'ng, xall ~~chors conforming to 5 and ~6 in Ta b1e No.~iI l-H may be us ad .~^ Alternative devices to be used in lieu of tension bolts for masonry wall anchorage shall be tested as specified in Section 15.42.090 (I1. 2. Oia ph ra gm chord stresses of horizontal diaphragms shall be developed in existing materials or by addition of new materials. 3. Where trusses and beams ether than rafters or joists are supported on masonry, ledgers or columns shall be installed to support ver?ical loads. 4. Parapets and exterior wall appendages not capable of resisting the forces specified in this Chapter shall be removed, stabilized or braced to insure that Lhe parapets and appendages remain in their original position. shalt be pointed with type S or N mor V ~ y ~ ^~ Lar (Masonry cements shall not be used). Prior to any pointing, the wall surface must be raked and cleaned to remove loose and deteriorated mortar. All preparation and pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a Registered Deputy Building inspector certified to inspect masonry or concrete. At the conclusion of the project, the inspector shall submit a written report to the Building Official setting forth the portion of work inspected. 6. Repair details shall be provided for any cracked or damaged un reinforced masonry wall required to resist forces specified in this Chapter. i_ the ty na_ and dmn_ncinnc of nv,i piing walk anri inn ci~n anri spacing of existing floor and roof members. 8. The extent and type of existing wall anchorage to floors and roof. 9. Accurately 4imensfoned floor plans and masonry wall elevations showing dimensioned openings, piers, wall thickness and heights. -~.gy~ 10. The location of cracks or damaged portions of unre inforced masonry walls requiring repairs. 11. The type of interior wall and ceiling surfaces and if reinstalling or anchoring of ceiling plaster is necessary, ac. iic ye+icra~ W~iui i~ml 5i urc mvl idr jJ nrva onu ii i~im ~a mia need pointing. -~- 9~~ TABLE ZQ-A AORIZONI'AL FORCE FACTOFB HARED ON OCCUPANT LOAD occwwNT I.own a~ Building with an occupant load greater than 100 al ocher 0.133 o.loo ~ TABLE III-H 7 a~iwv~e BEI8IQC ZONE FACTOR ZONE 4 1 TAWS iII-C I FACTOR OCCUPANCY FACTOR All Buildings (High. Medium h Low Riakl I.O TABLE >II-D FOR PARTS OR PORTIONS OF RATnvo cl~eenrtcwr[oN Is High Rbk Building Medium h Low Rfak Bulldings I,00 .75 TAWS Di-E REOVLATED EISI[ENT6 i $IRP~TSl$ Ef~iYitXr sariasarC ZorlE n Walt: h/t Ratlo x 'CenNOn bolt fbendlrtg) x In•p4ne shear x Panpeta x Floor and Roo(: Diaphragm stress and x diaphragm chords TAflLE III-F ALi.OWABLE VALUE OF ~[GRT-TffiCSNE,cB RATIO OF UNREIIYFORCED 11(ASONRY WALLS WIY'R ffiNIMAM 9UALl1Y MORTARI~ ~.avodwna,Re AS DElR® !~ aec. 16.44.W0 ' AI7.Ol'ffi7f BiBLDIl1U6 Walls o! One Story Buildings 16 13 c7..,~ e~...., vrai _r Multi-Story Buddings 18 15 WaDs In Top Story of Multi-Story Buddings 14 8 All Othc Walls 16 13 ~ Mldmum quaLty mortar ahaB be ddamlocd by laboratory tmtlng In accordance with Sectlc® 16.42.090(e). Table !II-G is not apphrabie to budda~ga of rating claselflntlon I. Walt a(bulldtn®r wtthln rating rlaestBcatlon 1 ahafl be emlYUd to accordance with Sactlon 15.42.060(p. TABLE III-G VALUES FOR E%ISTING MATER7AL3 I NEW I(AIF7tIALS ORCONtacuRnnON OF ! ~. rersnm: --, I >anzextwrs • I vAiuae I 1. Howzotrrac DIAPHItACtes a. Raofa with atratglrt aheathing and roo0ng 100 me. / R for oy~wCC..'...-2:.:iy :..::.~ ai.wu,:.y"y eeiaroie coast. b. Raota with diagonal aheathing and roofing 4001be. / R tot applied directly to the sheathing aelsmtc shear. e Floors with snalgtlt tongue and grove 150II1e. / R for sheathing. seismic shear. d. Floors with atratght sheathing and Ontahed 300 Cis. / R for woad flooring. e~(e ah~, e Floors with diagonal sheathing and ltruahed 460 ms. / R for woad Oaoring. aelrmla shear. f. Floma or roofs with straight shothlo$ and Add 601be. / R to plaster applied to the Joist or raRm. the s0awable valua far items lava. 2 SHEAR WAILS I00 ma. / R o a Wmrl ahrA walla arllh lolfi anA nlaar^r Olde ~ edaIDk 3. PLAIN CONCRETE FOO7IIiGS t 1600 pd lmleee o de ~, shown by tote. 4. DOUGLtiS F02 WOOD Allowable stress came ae Ml D.F.a 5. REINFORCING STEEL Q. 18,000-». / aq. ' maldmwns & SRgJClVRALSTEEL Ra20.000ibw! eq. ' maslmtms Material must be aourid eM N good emdltlaa ~ The wood lath url plntc must be renthrLed to eabtlog Jabb or nRaa in a mercer approved try the flwlding OOcisl. s ~n maybe 1nm'Nald tot COmbineflaos aI lelds r epecfEed m 9aetlm Eb.4S.OB0 tgl 2. TABLE lII-H ALLOWABLE VALVES OF NEW ](ATVOrarw USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH E7C78TIIY0 CONSTH;VCTYON ~ Oq vta N Z9r 1fA'[1CWAr-e oa OONlrOL)HATiOle oa 1fATLWAi.6 ' ' 1. HOI62ONTAL DIAPHRAGM6 Plywood ~t.~~tf.t..a ap Iied directly over odsting tralgbt whuthiry an~ mde d ptYe'ood eheeb Snnu Y apecitled b Table ZSJ d VBC. be~v~ on Jolsta or toilets and edge of plywood 'HB F,d., fw bbekad 1«ated on center d IndfNdunl eh<athtrtg boards. dtaplv~Yme. 2. SHEAR WA.L1S a. Plywood sheathing applied dlrcotly over odatlttg Same Y vw1uY mood studs. No vdue shall Fx given to plywood apecttied b UHC. apphed over Weitng Plaster or wood eheattnng. 'BB Ed.. Table 25-H Cor shear wWr. b. Dry wvL or plnater applied dkectly over adatfttg 7596 dthe values -+.aod etids. ;Fc16ed k VHC. '. ' c. Dry wall or plneter applied to plywood eheathhtg 33 1/396 dike evcr oSitDtg wood stutla. value apecl6ed m UBC.'6B Ed.. Table Ma]-I. 3. SHEAR BOLTS Shear taolb @ dowels embedded • min d S" Into 10096 d the value unxlofomed masoruy walla. Bolt cmtced Ina 2 for Plain tttaeoruy -1/2" dbmeter hole with dry-pack or non-aDr;ok apetd6ed m VBC. grout wround clrcumfes<nce of 1»I< or dawel.i• 'g9 Hd.. Table M2{-0. No gluts blast than those glvett for 3/a" Dolts atoll be used. 4. TENSION BOLTS Tevaim bolts @ dowels odmding enkeely through 1200 Ns. pc bolt YMiiIfOFld IIlaaOllry Walla aeCtYCd w/DY[t[tQ ^ date ar a1d< ofwW with at ICYt 30 p l Or dowel. . ~: r ~ s. wAU.wlvcttoRSCls.a2.loorol n. Holb ottmdfm to thv exivrbr face o[ the Wail silk 600 Iba. per bolt. • 2-1J2" ro plate under the head. Irstall Y epecl6ed for shear Dolts, Spaced not rlaaer thou l2" on miters. t•a? B. Kolb or doweb onendtng to the etdufor faced 1200IW. pa bolt or tb. wit anti. w'J-t /Z^ rmtM o1Ne Vndn'tbv Dead dowel. dt drfU at m att~e d 22-1l2 d • b the 1.15 ecute6 for bolo t l [atsta0ad Y a h m . m~ a . p o 7. INFW.ED WALLS I?litlfOrCld mYWntY IntklCd OPetttrtga Itt ~ 6ame Y VaIUC unrekdomed naasottry aval]a with keys or dowel to sDecl0ed for match reutforctng. uvtektfotled ttfYOnry wWa. 8. REINFORCED MASONRY D~aeotuy pllrf 6t vane R1nf01Ced p!r 3u.. 211 ]. ~, ~'BSBS E.d. Sam! Y Ottin<a to Table B. UBC. 'BS Ed. 9. RR RGS® CONCRd1S COtf<rwta bOtln'. wall and pletw R4dOtMf Y ValY Y O B a ID e aperf6ed d Clu7tar 26. UBC.'88 FA.. 4 dastard for ~ p ~ ~ pp d p t '~ UBf 9S @dK tributary Iwda. . ". ]O. E)QSTWO !'OVNDATION LOADS ftt~ tnisttlm-Srado due FOnrldaCOn IWN fOi atrltC[URa tOthlbtdtlg tt0 fYfYttm dYd ev/deMe d settlettrnt. vadittW ,mryQ lead tend taY be 506 fOi' fad krd ~ lW05C roptdled by thY t Boles and dowwb to bs ttMad Y aPac16M a L>eo. 16.12.OY0Ig. a Holt std detaels to be 1 /2 hteh vdrdmtun W dtstosesr. ~ DrWktg far boles and doveb shall tr dens vlth sn electM rotary dtUl. impact tool shale rrt be used for drllWtg MIY or tlghtenly aMhor and chest belt note. TABLE III-1 ALLOWABLE SAEAR STRE88 FOR TESTED r?tyA~l!'4ltf`F.?I R/iM1!MP_9 mA~I9 9094 ~ 1E9T 1i880LT3 ' AVAtMiE IE6T ItE00LT8 86181ftC A-17.aleE ~SaB 9A>kA txe IN PBI FOl I.E88 THM QIXMtL67R PS __ fa00~ AWA - 30 plus a~3a! stcss ep 3 pei~ ~ e 50 plus aidal atrem 33 5 p el' 1100 a~ awal etresa or I I 67 or more 10 pet max• 'Allowable ahea atreaa sap be tnc[meed by eddltton o(10'k of the axlai etreu due to the weight of th!. waII directly above. TABLE IIIJ: T!!~ LB1tIIT8 FOR COI~LiANCE AC7BS OWI®tT0 OM'AIII B~DIIUi P~1BT wR8II~ pi7®if C01~7'AOCliON A1T~f Complete Structwal Altemtloru or Building Demolition lyeerc 180 depa' 2ytan i tallatlon ~ Ina 1S0 dtrye ~ 1B0 daya• ~ l y~ •Meaaured from date of bufldtng pamlt lesuetlca TABLE IQ-H SERVICE PRIORITIES AND EETENDED TIMI; PROVISIONS RA1'IIfG OCCDPAIIT Iit~lOlL 6lfIISWOl1 OB CLASSIFLCAT[Ofl LOAD TLa PER<008 TIIa Aley6t WALL POi< Atlf:®OQB ARE Of Otmlit II187AIiZD High Rlak 13u0dmg 100 a mote 270 days 180 days Medium Risk Mare than 20 270 days I80 days Hu0ding but teas than 100 I,oq RWc Bu0ding Lees than 20 Yl0 days 1 year •Meaeund firom the edecfNe date of this ertldt. TAHIE III-L: HOli07ANTAL 10'ORCE BACTOli3 BASED ox RATIIIO cleaaDtlcr+aioN RATma cwatncATlt~n acs High Posk Butlding Medium/[.ow Rlslc 13u0d1np 0,193 0.100 TABLE TQ-flg: 80L2rLONTAL FORCE FACTOR "Cy " FOR PARTS OR PORTIONS OF SUII.DINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES] PART OR PORTION OF BUIIDING gip, N VALUE OF C p ' ca-ienor oear[ng @ non-lxaring WaLa. interior bearing walla & partttloru. interior non-bearing walls & partltlons over 10' in height. masonry fences over 6' Normal to in height. Flat Surface 0.20 C~i::lever parapet & Diner canillever Normal to walls, except retafNng walla. Flat Surface 1.00 Exterior & interior ornamentatlons and aPPendagn~ Any dlrectlon 1.00 Whm connected to or part of a buQdrg; towers, tanks, tower & :arks + cnntenb racks aver B'3" In height + contmb, chimneys, amokestaclc~, and penthouses. Any dtrectlon 0.20~'~ When connected to or part of a bullding: Rigid and rigidly mounted equipment and machinery not rryryulred for continued opemtlon of psentlal Any Horizontal occupande. s Dlrectlon 0.203 Tanks + effedrie contents reatmg on ground. Any dlrectlon 0.12 Floors and roofs acting as diaphragms. In the plane of the diaphragm 0.12 a Prefabricated structural elements, other than walla, with force applied at center Arty Horizontal of gravity of assembly. Direction p,90 Cotmectlons for exterior panels or elemrnb. Any dlrectlon 2.0 t See Sedton 15.42.080(b) Cor rise of Cp z When lomted m the upper portion o(nny bulldtng with a ratlo of 5 to 1 or greater the value shall be Inetased by 50%. 3 For [lexlWe and geidbly mounted egWpment and machmuY, the appropriate values [or Cp nllall be detarmmed with consideratlon given to both the dynamic propertlea of the equipment and machinery, sad to the building or structure >A which It V p4«d. ~'Ihe W far storage rarb shall be the weight of the racks plus eontenta. 'ihe value o[ Cracks over two storage support IeveL m height shall be 0.18 for [he leveb [he Eap two ieveL. s'Ihe design of the egWpment and machinery and their anchorage is an Integral part of the design and spetltieatlon of such egWpmectt and machinery. 1}te etntcture to which the equipment or machinery 1. mounted shall be apable o[ resistlng the anchorage forces (see aLo Section 2919 g0. UBC. '8B Ed.). e Floor and roofs actktg u d4phn~ris shall be dtylgried for a minimum Corte resultlng from a C poi . i2 applied to W tulles a greater force resulb tram the distribution o(lateral [Drees m accordance with 9cctlon 2912 (e), UBC, '88 F.d. GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS AND NOTATIONS 1588 Edition, Cp = Numerical Coefficient as specified in Section 2312(9) and as set forth in Table No. 23-d, UBC, 1988 Edition. n = The dimension of the structure, in feet, in a direction parallel to the applied forces. f~ = SDecifi ed compressive strength of concrete, psi, rp = Lateral forces on a part of the structure and in the direction under consideration. ft = Allowable tensile stress, psi. Lo = Height in feet above the base to level n. z Occupancy Importance Factor as set forth in Table No. III-C. S Numerical Coefficient for site-structure resonance. v the totai lateral force or shear' at the base. w The total dead load as defined in Section 2302, UBC, 1988 Edition, ..~1~~A1m •6n nonH ~: nn Ina Ainn cnorifiaA in $ar ti nn 7304(dl therei^ where applicable. wP = The weight of a Dor Lion of a structure or nonstructural component. a Numerical Coefficient for locations in Zone 4, Z=1. ~ a3 -"- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Sr. Adminietrative Aeeieta , SUBJECT: Service Charcee for Falee Alarm Ordinance Staff recomoende teat the City Council adopt the attached earvice charge schedule for the Palse Alarm Ordinance. BACEGROUMD: The attached earvice charge schedule Se based on similar schedules in other cities. The schedule ie graduated, than giving first time violators a chance, While creating a et tong monetary incentive for repeat violators to correct the situation. DAB:}le 90-014 RESOLUTION N0. 90 ~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO fllf qunNG,q, rgLi FORM A; AIITH ORT71Nf fFRTAiN SFRVifF CHARGES AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE N0. 409, CHAPTER 8.26 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SERVICE CHARGES FOR FALSE ALARMS n riinEA$, the City v "'1 ^f hha r`h ~~ of Ra rr hn CUC a1110 and did amend the Rancho Cucamonga Munic ipal• Cod ey Ord ina nce No. 409 by adding Chapter 8.26 Service Charges for False Alarms; and WHEREAS, Municipal Ordinance No. 409, Chapter 8.26 Service Charges for False Alarms, Section 8.26.020 Response Service Charges requires certain types of service charges to be zpplied; and WHEREAS, current rates for said service charges have been established. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that service charges are established pertaining to service charges for false alarms for the City of Rancho Cucamonga for false alarms during any given fiscal year as follows: Third fa ise alarm: S <^.5.00 Fourth false alarm: $ 50.00 Fifth false alarm: $ 75.00 C iv hh and a,h cam mnh Falca aiarmc• t10n.00 1 ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager BY: John L. Martin, Associate CTvil Engineer e~ , SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regardsna Eminent Oomaln action to acquire public right-of-way for the Base Line Road Widening, 1'ar Cel i~ap iib3o ~rvJ eci, ue i.wccu °i~ °'^~ I, ono and Rochester Avenue at Lhe properties located at 12428 and 12472 Base Line Road (APN 227-091-14 and 15) for the construction of street imprevements across the frontage of said properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the construction of street Improvements for the Base Line Road Nidening Parcel Map 11838 between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12428 and 12472 Base Line Road (APN 227-091-14 and 15) 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Ts an Eminent Domain action to acquire street rights-of-way for Base Line Road west of Victoria Park Lane adiacent to a recently approved <Fnnni nn ronlno "nA Da~~ot Yon Yn 1"D]D TFie anti nn i. AM ... .. Fwd ~~..~ required by the Agreement entered into between the City and Hughes Investments. The time limit of 120 days from date of filing of the map, to acquire this right-of-way, is set by the State Subdivision Map Act and is due to expire on Apr11 9, 1990. Therefore this action 1s brought before the City Council for consideration. It will need to be adopted should Council desire to enforce the condition of approval place6 on the parcel Map subdivision to construct offsite Improvements, not adjacent to the subdivided property. The owner of the parcels, Ms. Edna Ellena, has been courteous, but has declined to accept the monetary "offer of ,just compensation" made by the City, as established by an independent appraiser. Aithough negotiations continue, 1t is deemed necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right-of-way for the prapred develaoaent, orior to exairation of the ct.ate mandated ti!ae period for acquisition. Res y fitted, ' 's'---~- ~~ i RHM: ~ Attachment 10 RESOLUTION MD. / ~ "!(~~ A RESOLUTION ff TIE CITY COUNCIL dF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611 DECLARIM6 TIE PUBLIC NEED AID NECESSITY TO CONDENI A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOUITED IN TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKIM6 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. fil ?r,e City of Rancho Cuca!sorga has conducted a study perts*.ning to the wT deni ng, realignment, construction and improvement of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "protect"). Based upon such analysts, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for widening, realignment, construction and improvement of Base Line Road will require the acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commonly known by the street addresses of 12428 and 12472 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal7fornia, and more particularly described 1n the attached ExhiDlt "A". (ii) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City ..r .n .~.,.~.. .... ~.,, .~... _u_ ..._ .. establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (T11) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting Lhis resolution Lhe City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as establtshed by an independent appraisal vaiuatlon; (1v) On March 7, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the teram of California Code of L1v11 Procedure Section 1245.235 and said hearing was concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. e. Resolutiom. D7 NOM, THEREFORE, 4t is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resaluti on. SECTtt~I 2. ?hat :T real property which is reyu t, ed `_ 'hz street improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTIpI 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced publtc hearing, Including written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The pubiic interest and necessity require the proposed pro3ect; b. The proposed pro3ect 1s planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private in3ury: c. The property defined in this Resolution Ts necessary for the proposed pro3ect; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in eminent domain. The City Attorney 1s ordered and directed to bring an action 1n the Superior Court of the State of California fcr the County of San Bernardinc. to the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all Lhings necessary to prosecute said action to its final c~ I ~4 determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and Instructed to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an order penaitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and ouroosed herein Aecrrt heA. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1990. ayor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dR hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of March, 1990, and was finally passed eta regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of March, 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOFS: f.01TNf.T1 MFMRGRC• ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga '~/ 4- i SEC 32, T I N. , R. o W , S. B. M. ;. ~ I r-----~ _~ s;i o, i I ~_ J tTIWANL'A COLONY LA~iCS ; ~ I''a ~ .m r/t o f:LOCI< J 13 :.~' ~' ' -NI~- ~~no•u ~~I et11 ;t ALLEY •~,.•~~./I:~ , / 1 .~ , ~~ ~ ~~ i~ 6N/~N,nF ,I ~~i ~)~- I --~~~Cj ~ ~nG ~.;~ bid ~ o Fa/r~iEG ,v"",~'~`~~~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ -.co `2 .,0 ~~ .W I °I ._ ~b d, ~~ n^ 'M CU9L'6 A/L/NE C7lA ~~~ ~~ a~ ~~;~ i I (~ n-/eao co•a-ro's92r'<-a~co ~ ~ hN I 41,,.3 ~ tiN V.S'O)'fJ ~N' gyp/Of ~/_:•yN~/N I ~ ~ ~ 4 •AHLE'G 'A• I Q aw'~ti Z^ ~ oA( ~ i ~^?e v'~~a is (oi is ~rii4i it iL rC~tii" ". a I W4'o Mtl r0~O L 0~9T ~ ~(T~ {~ i ~ WKti t :'..' P.9i7CE[ "A" ~ ~ ~~~~u I -- ---~ -~ ~, I W /sli .c,.. % N IliUlll'~I':4 ~' i~6JOV . J ".N\. Ib i9[~~ ~~ r c>ar ? I u , en J / //I/'/n aO.v AiiOf/ntl.^•. /.vC _ Ex,UrBiT "A" _ C/TY Of HAA/CHO CUCAMONGA IrIlS H~l151'Cl([IMIIO/N(pU1/µ'INf 4VAr[(SIOCSCN19rOlN rHr 5//rrr /O! / J/I~VrfC [al<unlrnl /I IS rvO)IY4N/Ol rMr WH/IrFN prSfNNIrtJN II.(NC/N. >cur /'. GO:_ twlW,v er ~~.'wrc d /1/JOl sw~rrr S.'OR`FASEME Y5 ___ [L C r Y~~' EXIi(3IT A-h E%hII BIT A-3 E:NIBIT •n• LEGAL OES CM1:PTI C4 OF Pn0.CEL 'A• ANO •S' (Sl11fE EAS E4 F.tiT) n a t nvl i =he Clcy of AancLO Cummn nrn, County n[ San Br rn nrJino, ":a:e .. of Gil ;(n roln,~ vv UVin =lent p°r=ton °f 1°[s J0. ]l nntl R of Or°n r.c Fmpire n~l'r^. n[ ^nn".. i... ~. ~. ;i. •_•~ ..: .:..r^. ..t I.n Re 1. Ne=°rtli °f tian germ rd:ne County, Call(o role end note pnrelcu lerly de ac rihed as [oilevz; P n(t rl r'= (SLOPE FAS JffNT) - _ __ __ ~ as vu c z ti. - "J[J"pa me also,be(ng•the Nn[cM1eezc ~c "a r°( rhac ceren(nspnrcel c°sveYeJ c the Cuv. ( San Baron rd Lno by J<ed r ordetl Noaenher 25, l9JJ in 9eok L22,0 page >06 ca (00(RcinL ftec4ra x, M1eaerda °( 5nn Be rna[Jlno Coonty, CollEo rn ln; T1:.`n<e N. 00" OB' 01• E.., elanR sold Eazc lino a dtxcence of 11).89 (eeq Thence N. tl9° S4' B)• V„ a tlls cvnce of ].00 feet to • polo[ herelne feet rr [errrtl Co ns Pofn[ 'A•; f be nce 5. UO" OS' 0)• W„ a d(s canee of 18.00 feeq The c Southvesce[ly ° o cahgen rha Norchve c hnv(ng, n naius o. :4.00 feet, through a angle=o( 9]°02Jw43•~ an are length a[ ]9.15 leer c n point of r ve[se < rve alre; Thence Ves:erly o artve concave co cM1C Sw rh hoeing a rndtus o[ Ig40.00 (etc, ch rough a ongle of 00" BS' 2J•, an arc lengtM1 of 10.00 face (the initial r:,d v al I(nn hm rs N O]° 12' S2• E.); Thence 5. )4" 54. 40^ V., o d!scn nce of 91.21 (eee m chi potnc of hrg iam ng of the pv reel co be des[ [1600; in ante s, 00" 10. 1J• F.., n dls [once of 12.00 lace; TM1ence 5. 9]° B]' 10• V., z d(s[ance of 1/.1.10 feet co v pain[ on the No:ch .[ of said parcel c veyeC :o the Cwnry of Sen ae roam too; re1'Lence 5. 99" /.9'021^ V., along zn{J I:a eh line a als canee of 115,)9 (ceq Thence N. B1' S]• IO' E., a alscan<e v( ]S]J1 feet co chv paint aC nin5. Con uvl ns: ]5)) SF °r 0.09 nc[ea R\fl Cfi. "9" (SLOPE EAS FN ENi) BrRlrning nc thr Frrr lnbeloee menelo nrd Po (ne •A^; mm~ce s. UU" h5' W^ 4., a dts ca nce aE 18.00 [eee; Tllc ore Sour F.vc xrerly o . re ngene carve e e co the 0orchvese having n rod tus aE 24.00 fee[, ch [0086 an eagle of g]uoZcav45•, nn ere iengch o: 19.15 . of rave rze :u ce; O~TM1encerVeaoerly on a cha Bouh having a rndlm of 1940.00 lace, through a angle oEc00"eS5~n2)•~ an etc lengrh of ]0.00 face (the lntclal radial t(ne bears N. O1° 12' SY E.7; Thence N. 42" ])' )2' E., a distance of 81.93 feet ca the paint of beginning. Conca(ns; iGl] SF or 0.01 ac rea De sr rip clan preperea oMer the zupe rls ion of: ~~L+C~i/ P-zt_e9 Ylll tam ~I nading wn L,s. ]e 21 oau (or J. F. JIaulJeOn Naocle re e, [nc. ~S~p lANO S``[+~ s" Wh('AM N L'r/ Ap01NL10M A 1;/} Ile 7841 J ~`F [1~AL1V11Pt\ SAC 3~, TIN.,R 6~V.,S.B.M I . --7 I ~~ i ~ L- ~ NI _ ETI'TVANDA COLO~~Y LANDS ~ I7. {" ~ i BLOCK J ~g „"~%° , ~, - +~ f7CCE.v `aua.>: n~e~noiv <ar ? ./ ~I m'~ // t1 ^` cA~'[evE tOlJ2 ~ I~ J ' I ~ l ~ .,/~Y~.,4T ~s~}j ~ 1 rnl~- ~~ I .a` v ej ! ai ~ <~, ~,W a ~ i ~. ~ ~ ,e-/esn m'a. cc•sszr L-~a ro' by L ~ it , IJ n•a/ar c•9j YVb5'[-es/s' i }•~y 5ro'o5'oPw .A9.ce• i ~ ..N9 .ELI 1~f'- ~'n~n~~.r ~ .)~I-„ MO ZO// ~I W h .:J iS~Q IANU g p` ~~~: NIIVA4N o AODINfiDN p I# L4 .Q So-q( x, LYSC.^/Plt'1'J /:Y/+vwn c:va~n ~G.V/fFnl%YO,v p- \'L'/. Nd 7911 ~,? i ~/ ~ C•lw~n~'! yr CAl^'> ~cL/.vr //Fn .nf:>o 153eZi oo/r fOH J v !1%vT.JOA>A55oC/n.T3. /mc // /~ // C/lY Of FiAA/CHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT A-2 In15 ttAIIS SIX tV 4Y 1/0 /ry Lpry)/,w !Nf ALtfFL /5/ OfSCq/!FO /N INF / I)IIOrfO LbCVM(NI If l5 M0!/pIgIOF INf NgII)fN (X SM((I /QF scar r I ~ 6o LF4Nrv Nr cfr.vaalf 2 /1,09 sus~ecr $i~lEE/EASEM6U/ EX111a:T "n" EXH16i7 A-1 LECAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL "A^ (STREET fAS F.M ENT) A11 chat land In chc Clty of R:mcho Cuc anon gn, County oC San Bernardino, Sta ce oC Ce!Stn rnia, within chat porclmi of Lots 30, J1 and J2 aE Ornnge F.inptre Ac res :,s :shown by map on fLle in nook 20 of Maps, a[ page 1, Records of San aernardlr.o Counf y, Ca1LForn to and more par tlcuiorly desc rtbed as Collows; pAR rct, ••, ~~ (STREET GASEN ENT) Beginning ae a po ine on the Easc line of sa ro Lot J2 wiiici, beaus , O7" E., a discs nce of 20.00 feet from the Souehe~st corner of sold Lot 32VSaid point also F,c ing Che r~or ci,a a.,c ccraer cf "F,^r ~... _nnrcel conveyed co [he County of San aerna rdlno by deed recorded November"25, 1977 in book 922. page 204 of Offf.c Sal P.eco rds, Records of San Be rnard too Coun cy, Cal Lforn ia; '[hence N. 00° OS' 0>^ E.., along said Easc lLne a dis eance of 117.89 feet; Thence N, 89° 54. 53" N., a dis [ante of J.00 fecq Thence 5. 00° 0$' 07" U., a dis Lance of 18.00 feet; Thence Sou chwes terly on a Cange nc curve concave co the Northwese having a radius of 24.00 fee[, through an angle of 9]° 27' 45^, en arc length of 79.15 feet co a po tot of t'everse curvature; Thence ues cerly an n curve concave to the Sou ch having a radius of 1840.00 Cee c, through an angle of 00° 55. 27", an arc length of J0.00 feet (the inicLal radial line bears N. 07° 72' S2" E.); Thence 5. 7G° 55' 40" W „ a dis trance of 91.22 feet; Thence S. 00° 70' 77^ G„ a distance of 12.00 feet; Thence 5. el° 17' 10" U„ a d[s lance of 241.70 Eeet co a point on the North sine of said pa reel conveyed to Che Cow[y of San eernardine; Thence N. 89° 49' 21" E„ along sn Ld North line a dlsconce of 789.42 fee[ co the point of beginning. ' Co rata ins: 10914 SF or 0.25 acres Descrlp clon prepared under Che supo [vision of: 8"Z S ~ 89 OLLllam II. Addlogcon .S. 7821 Date for J.F. Davidson Assoc Sates, Inc. WII tIAM H. ' ADDINCiON oo C.. 3~.y No. 3841 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 ' To: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Johr. L. Harts.^., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Danatn ~~++rr to acquire puoltc right-of-way for Base Line Road, Parcel Map 11838 Protect, between Yictoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12504 Base Ltne Road (APN 227-111-12 and 13) for the construction of street improvements across the frontage of said properties. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with ccndemnatton of right-of-way for the construction of street improvements for Base Line Road Protect between Ylctoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue at the properties located at 12504 Base Line Road (APN 227-111-12 and 13) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~ Vf ,~` V nYn~,vv~, v/ n~,n,. ,.~,., This is an Eminent Domain action to acquire street rights-of-way for Base Line Road west of Victoria Park Lane adtacent to a recently approved shopping center and Parcel Map No. 11838. This action 1s being pursued as required by the Agreement entered into between the City and Hughes Investments. The time 17m1t of 12U days from date of filing of the map, to acquire this right-of-way, is set by the State Subdivision Map Act and is due to expire on Apr11 8, 1990. Therefore this action 1s brought before the Ctty Council for consideration. It will need to be adopted should Council desire to enforce the condition of approval pt aced on the Parcel Map subdivision to construct offslte Improvements, not adtacent to the subdivided property. The owners of Lhe Nabisco parcels, NablSCO Brands Inc., and So. Pacific q ail pnaA h"yn nnen ~ni~nton US, anti hayo 5i~ggn<terl nra4i5 dads tali en thereby declining the monetary "offer of ,lust compensaiton" made by the City, as established by an Independent appraiser. However, a request was made of the City for "commitment of support and cooperation with respect to the future development of Nabisco's remainder property." Staff has not made any cammlLment, other than to review any proposed development with a courteous and prompt response. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPDRT PM 11838, PUBLIC HEARING OF PROTESTS REGARDING EMINENT DOM4IN MARCH 7, 1990 PAGE 2 nitnougn negattations continue, 1t is deemed necessary at thls time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right-of-way for Lhe proposed deveiopment, prior to expiration of the State manila*_ed time period for acquisition. ReS pettfUl~SUdllt tted, i ~f~~ ~~~ r % ~ "" / RHM:JLIhiy Attachment /~ RESaurIDN No. q~-~to A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COUNCIL ff TIE CITY OF RANCHO gITA1NMt611 OECLARIN6 TIE PUBLIC NEED AMD NECESSITY TO CONOEIM A PQtTIOM OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII AND MANIM6 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Rect tat s. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the widening, realigrmaent, construction and improvement of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue Tn the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "project"). Based upon such analysts, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for widening, realignment, construction and improvement of Base Line Road wilt require the acquisition of a portion of Lhat certain real property commonly known by the street address of 12504 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and more particularly described Tn the attached Exhibit °A". (ii) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (Tit) Pursuant to the provisions of California Goverrent Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this resolution the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as estaDllshed by an Independent appraisai valuation; (iv) On March 7, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pars want to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 and said hearing was concluded prior Lo the adoption of this Resolution; and, (v) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adopt/on of this Resolution. ria B. Resolution. NOW, TREREFptE, 1t is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamm~ga as follows: SEGfIpI 1: In all respects as set forth 1n the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. SECTIgI 2: That the real property which 1s required for the street improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifically outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTIBN 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, including written and oral staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private Injury: a, The property defined in this Resolution 1s necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owners of said real property pursuant to the terns of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SEGfIgI ~: The City Council hereby declares Its intention to acquire the property described to Section 2, above, by proceedings in eninent daaatn. Tha i,i P.y Attorney i< erderod and ds. rarfied to bring an action in tic CeporT nn Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardlrw, 1n the nave of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein Por the purpose of condemning for street improvement 113 purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney 1s authorized and Tnstrutted to make applications to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by wav of money deoost is as may ha directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposed herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1990. I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heid on the 7th day of March, 1990, and was finally passes at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the 7th day of March, 1990, by the following vote: n'ic5: i.iiimi.i~ rieivseic~: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AP,STAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga ~{- 'r ~ ~. ~ ~ y '' 7 Ul ~j_ A n' ~ ~" ~o EXHI6IT A-4 I L Ar„q Cf/ fnV1 E3 EO:~ .k'HH/Sf-L, !VG __ r~ L~SCHitY%O /N EXNitl/q"L-OF LISEO _ /l~CCnrY.'D L'CC cV L P~) qS /N;)/ a.n !?/-U</( IH. HECCHM CF :q.J GY'/LYfY1LYNp LOUF/T/, C/1U/`OHN/f7. ~--. SEC. 32, i . I N., R.6~V., S. B. NI. ~ E ~ ~ ~ I Ff7fiCEL //F~ „ ,_: I I ^ ~~'`~ -. `~ ° t LTIWANUN I.GL uiJ~i i..i+i'uvS . ~ ((~~ Z JS.W' ~~ ~ <C 1~ • f 1 s ~ ~ ~; ~ ° l iANU ,SU , c S~ ,~ , r `~ F.3ASE ~ I L/!VE `JOF/ p ~ ~~% Ym!I;,M11 c "ooirlcron . b-3o-4i ~ 6V. -_ II l I Foev.~ewm!%!' _ ' :c~:^ ~,v,- __~ \s. tlo. 3821 f~' ' ~ SCUF. /Oit/E'QUNHiE/9 CC39. a:c ~ '. ~ 9 w ~ ~. ,lF f0 . pF CAl1 __ CE3["H/F//~V F/,': /A/.`lo ILUCG'/1l~YE S:f~"ffY%D.i:V CUfT (/E ~`///1/l D.9TA uF' (r~ h,z.rLt~' ~=e~'o~'zo° c-9l T3' ,(/,r~-~~C/~f/j~ ~ ~-Z`;-%y OZ fi°/v9-'+O ~' d•Lk7'L/'9~v' t'O. J',o' NrtcraMrT. ALViNbr ~~ [.S i'JZ% ~lvlC F0,9' !1 NLU'"0.+'07"E .:.Z3' /. f. DAI%O:~CYV A~uCC//{J£S,INC. EX.4~,F/T „A y C/TY OrC i`3ANCN0 CIJCAMONGF~ rl,ls PCarls saar.walol,v tDCar/nc rNe nv~ce /s/oescF/eco /N me sl+eer l ov,L, F7Ia[NEO COCUMENT /r /S NOIa PARr OF rNf MR/rrEN DESCR/PT.'ON r/f_NF/N. state / ": on, rnaHN er CCtt anr[ ~, /? /PO suo~ecr SCOPE EAS~MENl UO/Oi 9-7 .w....,,, ~ .~~ ..~..u ~) .y~.o....n ExuIBIr •A" ,. r.GAL DESCRiPiION OF PAP.CEL "A' (SL07E EASEHENT) IT A-3 Ali tlme In nd Ln cho Ciey of Rn nclw Cucoino nqn, County of Snn Bernard Lno, Senco nC Coll EO rn Le, vlcbin choc part Lon of Loc ll lu aleck •J• oC GCSwa ode Colony Londa as shown by map on Fl le In cook 2 of Maps, ec pege 24, Records of Son Be rnnrd Sno County, CallfornLo and more particularly described as follows: PnIiC F. i. "A" (SLOPE EAS E.Y ENT) Coimne nc Lae nt the Sou Ch one-quarter corner of Sec cton .72, Tovnshlp 1 North, Range 6 IJesr, Son 8c rnnrd Lno He rldinn ns shovn by map of Tract No. 12044 on File In Book 167 of Haps, ac pages 78 chr°ugh 89, Records of Sen Bernerdlno County, C-1l r,.ni~. Thence N. 00° 05. 07" E. along Ule Norco anu aoucn qua r[er section line also being the lies terly Llne of chat cerca to par<el conveyed to Nobisco, Inc. and described in Exhibit "C'• of deed reco Ned December 29, 1987 as Instrumenr No. 87- 451628. Records of San ee rnnrdlno County, Callforn in, a dts ranee of 177,76 Cea e; Thence S. 89° 54' SJ" E., a dls cenco of J3.00 feet to the point of beg Lnning. of the parcel [o he dese rlbe d; Thence S. 00° OS' 01' M., a distance of 48.78 fee c; Tbene° Souche ns re rly on a tangent curve concave co the Norcb ease hoving a rod lus of 24.00 feet, through an angle of 83° O7. 20', on ere length of 34.79 fee[ to a paint of reverse curvature; 'the ace Eas Ce rly on a curve concave co the South having n raJ Lus of i8L 0,00 feet, through an angle of 00° O1" 4G", nn arc length of 0.9G feet (the initial radial line bears N. 07° OL' 47" E.); [o a point on the Eas [erly line of sold parcel conveyed co tlahlsco, Inc.; Thence N. 00° OS' 07" E., along Bald Easterly line n dls ranee o; J.21 feet co an angle poLnc in Bald line; Thence S. 8')° 54' S1" E. ca nelnuing along Bald Easterly 11ne n dlstnnco of 15.00 feee Co an angle poine In sold 1IYie; Thence Northerly contlnu tag along said Cascerly line on a non-conge nt curve 12", an arc length of 10.~2H Eeec (the 1nLCtn1 radial line bears 5. 89° 54' S)"E.); 'Ch cote tJ. 20° 25' S!"U., a dLstance of 02.79 feet; Thence tl, 89° 56' S7"U., o dls cattce of 15.00 feet to the polo[ aC be ginning. Contains: 1E59 SF ar 0.04 acres lescrtp cton prepared undo[ the wperv is Lon of: !illiam 11. Add Lngtun .S. 7821 Date ~or J.F. Davidson Assoc in Ces, inc. ' 191LLIAM q,• ADOINCION ,No. J821 , ~' EXHi6iT A-2 s I. ~~ ~- fr~HCec cnvi~ a~rn,;7 NAtl/=ro, /ee `} ~ Lt:5Cf1/PElJ /A/ E,<///tl/7"'C'OF LEED ~~ ~ ~Cnn[~O B HG~CC~,9C.Sl F,' N tSEHNFIHQOVO GOU.VTY. GCUPOHN/fJ. Rtl I =^ I SEC. 32,T.IN.,R.6VV.,S.B.fv1. v Q•U ~~ ~ ~j9~'i 5e~'sos3E ~ '~~ "~~ LTIWANDA COLONI' LANDS «t ~ 'lvl ~ ~ BLOCK J :,, e ~ 1 ~ tY ~L :. ~, / ,_ J 13 °~' r^ ~ NOJ J/ ~/i E' } Z v rni ~ o o ~'af3 CEL 'fl "' ~~ ~, ~~ p' roD .VCHPNER(/C tt'ER~'FCF/. / r H ~: ~ b ~ -e en Hem/~c~q crl 2], /n: s rv iY I 3J' I y, [Yl1.U/J/>U/,000IXINl Y,~iF<//ril)N/N. ~J d.02°.99'34• `.z5g. G/NNin/G ~ diJl -` /~~tAND SSG I ~ /.°JfIJ`~ ~~' L/.t/E f30fJp _~~' nill~nMri `a ~ ml I/ eomr+cren ~ ~p IJ ,~ b-3o~VZ ~~I _sECrAz ue--4u„'H;~~n cm. \. s/ 1l0. 3921 d ' \9~FOf Cpltip2 CUr9!/F DP.: e 2 fJ'/CV:eO Ci9' d • L19'C/'rp ~ C • O. Jls ' cFSCn/f'rav ir~ci.vncouuoen /r: °:/r-/wr..cv O.° W/LC/qM NNOL%NG/~~G[/ UNIT I'Of1 /~.+F~(L1~9~V/OSC.V FT~'.~~CY/RTS, /.UC. C. /V~7 ~.~// ~~ /~ Ti C/TY Ors F3ANC,~/O LL/CA/~fOrUGA Tn/5 PL.al /5 SIX. ELY .TN A/0 /N (Dfi1TlHG 7NE Fl7/KEL (SJ CESGR/DEO /N THE SHEET I OF.J TT<O/ED ~CUh/Eh? lr IS NOTAPdNT OF TNF WRITTEN h.'SGp/PTION TIfREiN. ca~E•/"= 40' L19pNN BY ~,,1 P1TE ~ /? /~ sos~ECT STf1EET EA~EMEA/r dU/o594 Nabisco, Inc., o lieu Jersey Co rporotlon exutnn "n• LECAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL •A• (STREET EASENENT) EAII?NIT f,-1 All chat land In the Clcy of Rancho Cucamonga, County of Sen Be rnnrdlno, Ste to of Callforn La, within that portion of Loc 1J Ln Block •J" of Etiva nda Golo ny La rds as shown by map on FLle Ln Book 2 of Maps, nc page 24, Records of San Be rnazdlno Lounty, Callfo[nle and more parcicu La rly described as follows: pARCEh "A" (STREET EASEHENT) Commencing at the Seuch one-quarter corner of Section 72, Township 1 North, Range 6 tie sc, Son Berm rdlno Her Ldlan ns shown by mop of 1'r etc No, 12044 on Pilo in ;,• r sc p „es 78 ch much 09. Records of Snn BernerJLno County, ~Dalifornla ;~ v~ J " Thence ti. CO° 05' 07" E. along the North and South quarter section 11 ne also Laing ilia Lies terly iLne of chat certain parcel conveyed to !7ablsco, Inc, and described in Exh LbLC "C" of deed recorded December 29, 1987 as Ins crument No. 87- _ a., rdl. fnoncy. Cnllfornla, a dis ca nee eE 67,47 EeeC to clue Vinos c„LJes ce rly -corner of choencerea Ln pn r<e1 conveyed to tl~c County of Snn Bernardino and described es Parcel 1 of decd recorded Oeeober 27, 1965 In Book 6500, page n75 of OEEtc inl Records, Rem rds of San Bernardino County, Caltfoznla, said corner being the po lne of begLnning of the parcel co be described; The ncc coati nu tog N. 00° OS' 07• R. along said Notch end South quarter sec ciao Lire also be log sald.Nesterly line of pn reel conveyed co Nnblsco, Inc. n dls cnnce of 114.37 fee c; Thence S. R9° 54' SJ" E., n dls tance of 73.00 Foeq Thence S. UO° OS'O1" N., a distance of 48.78 feet; Thence Soucheas [e rly on a tangent curve concave to Che Northe n5t having a radius of 24.00 fee e, through an angle of 87° 01. 20", an arc length of 7A .79 feet c° a paint of rave rte curvature; '!hence Easterly on a curve concave co [he Soueh I+nv1nC a radius oC 16GO.V0 fee c, ch rough an angle of 00° O1. 46", an arc length of 0.9G feet (the initial . u n~o nl' 47• E.): to a po Lne on the Eas early line oC s¢Id parcel conveyed-eo Nnblsco, Inc.; Thenc° S. 00° OS' 07" N., along se Ld Easterly line a dls ennca of 47.45 feet to a po inc on the Northerly line of sold pn[cel conveyed to the Caun cy of Snn Be rna rdLno; TI)e nee Ucsterly along s¢ld No reherly line on Che Soueh having ¢ tmdtus of 1277.00 feet, through length cf 55.08 EeeC to ctie point of beginning (the Contains 4850 SF or 0,11 acres Description prepared under Che su perv Ls ion of: ~~ ~~ P-L5-d9 Ntlllam H. AddLn goon L. 1821 Dnce for J.F. Davidson Assoc la ces, Inc. `'S.~O IAND SSA/~i V WILLIAM II. p ADOINGION N n non-Cnngcnt curve concave [o an angle of 02° 73' 74", nn me initial rod l¢1 line bears N. U2 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REP®RT DATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Nal ter C. Stitkney, Associate Ct vii Engineer SUBJECT: The adoption of a Resolution updating the drainage fee for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution which updates the drainage improvement fee for all developments within the Etiwanda/San Sevai ne Area. BACIfOAWMD/ANALYSIS: On August 2, 1989, the City Council approved a drainage master plan and policy for the Etiwanda/San Sevatne Area. Ai so fn August of that year, the Ccuncil adopted a Resolution which updated the drainage fees for that area of the City. State Asembly Bill 1600, which requires a study (in this case a master plan of drainage) be made which ,iust',fies any esta611shment of ar change fn development fees, also requires that the study be reviewed on an annual basis for changes affecting those related development fees. During the course of our annual review, certain minor technical aWustments were made. In addition, the cost estimates reported in the master plan study were ad,)usted by the Engineering News Record Index to arrive at current year dollars. The resulting drainage fee amounts and the relative changes from the current fee amounts are listed below. Proposed Proposed Fee Increase/ Amount (Decrease) (per net acre) (per net acre) Regional Mainline Facilities: Upper Etiwanda f 7,800 i 50 San Sevaine 2,500 (30) lower Etiwanda 0 0 CCSR March 7, 1990 Page 2 Secondary Regional Yictoria Basin 400 0 Henderson/Nardman System 6,400 (2501 Hawker-Crawford System 3,700 40 Upper Etiwanda Interceptor 2,000 (40) Master Plan Upper Etiwanda 8,900 (100) Gn CaYai re 2,900 (200) Lower Etiwanda 16,500 (500) The reduction in some of the fee amounts have came about as a result of the technical ayustments mentioned above coupled with a very slight increase in the 1989 construction index used. This drainage fee update will take effect inmediately with all new development in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area being reQuired to pay the updated amounts. Respect y submJtted, ~• i/ R Attachment I I RESOLUTION N0. 9D ~ ~ i I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING UPDATED DRAINAGE imreuveneni rccs rua A~~ ven~urnenw diiniri T;;~ ETINANDA/SAN SEVAINE LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGA NHEREAS, the City Council of the Cf ty of Raecho Cucamongz hzs zdop•°d Ordinance No. 402 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging an Eci Wanda/aan Sevaine Area Orai nags Improvement Fee; and NHEREAS, a master plan of drainage study of the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Local Drainage Area, along with an analysis of the need for new developnM•nt was conducted, and said study set forth the relationship between new development, the needed facilities, and the estimated costs of those improvements. The study, entitled "Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage", was prepared by BSI Consultants, Inc., is dated August 1989, and was adopted on August 2, 1989; anA NHEREAS, an annual review of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage is required along with the review and adJustment of said drainage improvement fees; and NHEREAS, the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage and the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Fees Adiusbaent - January 1, 1990, was available for public inspection and review fourteen (14) days prior to this nnbl{r hn"ni nn• and WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: A. The purpose of this fee is to finance drainage facilities to reduce the impacts of flooding caused by new development, within the Etwwanda/San Sevaine Local Drainage Area; B. The drainage fees collected pursuant to this resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in the "Etiwanda{San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage"; C. After considering the study and analysis prepared by BSI Consultants, Inc., entttied "Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage", and the testiapny received at a public hearing on February 1, 1989, the Cauncsl aaoroved said ctudy on A~gvst 2, sago, and further fihds that thR new development in the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Local Drainage Area will generate additional flood hazards within the impacted area as described in the "Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Pian of Drainage", and will contribute to the degradation of the public health and safety in that EtlweiMa/San Sevaine Local Drainage Area; fI~ Resolution No. Page 2 D, There is a need in this described impact area for drainage facilities which have not been conntructed or have been constructed, but new development has not contributed its fair share towards these facility costs and said facilities have been called for in or are consistent with the City's Public Health and Safety Element of its General Plan; E. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities ~,...... "' t`a ' ~^•^'^ ^^ ^_tel ~;o~* co. „hicn the cnrrespondinq fee is charged, and, also there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships or nexus are in more detail described in the study referred to above; F. The cost estimates set forth in the "Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Dratange Fees AdjusLeent - January 1, 1990" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: Definitions. For purposes of this resolution: (a) "Benefit area" is that property which is generally tributary to that particular drainage facility. (b) "Net area" is the net of the area of the entire parcel, after exclusion of the area of ali public street and highw4y rights-of-way and public lands, with respect to which a Building Permit is issued. 2. A drainage improvement fee shall be assessed upon approval of a tentative map, a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel map, director reviews, site approval, location and development plan, conditional use penait, or the issuance of a building persit for development in the Etlwanda/San Sevaine local Drainage Area and shall be paid either prier to the recording of a subdivision map, a parcel aap, the waiver of a parcel sap or the issuance of a building persit, whichever occurs first, in the benefit area depicted and described to the 'Etlwenda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Drainage". Nhen fees are collected upon the issuance of a building penal t, the amount of the fee and the area For which the fee shall be considered paid shall be determined by the 6uildino Offieial, !il!en fees are collet+~d prior U tho recording of a final or parcel sap, the asount of the fee and the area for which the fee shall be considered paid shall 6e determined by the City Engineer. [n either case, the Dull ding Official or the City Engineer shall I I~ Resolution No. Page 3 determine if the development lies within this benefit area, the type of development and the corresponding fee to be charged in accordance with this resolution. 3. Fee, fie fee structure shall apply to ail level op ent in i benefit area and shall be based on the following schedule: Regional Mainline Fee Upper Etiwanda f 7,800 per net acre San Sevaine E 2,500 per net acre Lower Etiwanda -0- per net acre Secondary Regional Fee Yictoria (Yictoria Basin) E 40U per net acre Henderson/wardman S 6,400 per net acre Hawker-Crawford S 3,700 per net acre Upper Etiwanda Interceptor f 2,000 per net acre Master Plan Fee Upper Etiwanda f 8,900 per net acre San Sevaine f 2,900 per net acre Lower Etiwanda f16,500 per net acre a FunAc Fnee ~nll n~laA Shan Ho ..L inn .. ~,. e,...e. ':~~^~t~ designated- o~the construction of the applicable drainage facility. Fees from the three Regional Mainline areas shall be placed in a single fund for the construction of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Regional Mainline System. Three separate funds shall be set up for the Upper Etiwanda Interceptor, Henderson/Nardman and Hawker-Crawford Secondary Regional areas. The four Master plan areas shall contribute to a single Master Plan fund. The Yictoria Basin Secondary Regional area shall also contribute to the Master Plan fund in order to reimburse the City's Master Plan fund for the drainage facilities already conntructed. 5. Use of Fee. The fee shall be solely used to pay (11 for the described pu c ac ties to be constructed by the City; (2) for reimbursing the Ctty for the development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City; or (J) to reimburse other developers who have ^onstructed Dublic facilities describeA in the °Etiwanda,/can Sevaine Alba Master Plan of Drainage", where those facilities were beyond that needed to mitigate the impacts of the other developers' project or pro,)ects. 6, Fee Review. The City Council shall review and ad,)ust this fee to determine a er a fee amounts are reasonable related to the impacts of developments and whether the described public facilities are still needed. Th{s fee shall be adjusted on January 1 of each year by the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index of Januaary 1 of that year 1n proportion t0 a s~ia~lirepor~fits~fi(ndaingsyto ~theBCi'fy L48unc~va~"d no~iceRipuR~~c9hg~R~6~"'6Rb recoaaaend any ad,~ustment to this feeaor other action as may be needed. II l CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 ^ T0: City Council and City Manager `~ FROM: Russell H, NamiT rn [i ~ s-yi ~__; BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectar~~' I SUBJECT: REQUEST TO AMEND CITY COUNCIL PDLICY ON RELEASE OF OCCUPANCY FOR TRACT 13697 (DALY HOMES) LOCATED Dw rNF wFCT SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF CARRARI ~ REf.Ol~EIfD11TION: It is recoamended that City Council direct staff to continue to withold final occupancies for Tract 13697 located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and CarrarT Street pursuant to Resolution No. 88-557. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Several months ago the developer, Daly Homes, was advised that the block wall alcng Haven Avenue was constructed in the public right-of-way. The developer's engineer furnished the Engineering Division a letter with copies of perwits and a grading plan showing the wall on public right-of- waY. The construction aF the watt wac incnnrrnn anw sf r,l~.e~ ti., a_ Building and Engineering Divisions. After investigation by Engineering staff, it was determined that the Building and Engineering Divisions were under the impression that the wall would be constructed on private property according to the approved Haven Avenue community trail inprovement plan. The developer's engineer was sent a letter advising him of these findings, and was advised that the developer would have to relocate the wall or have each affected property owner execute an encroachment agreement accepting responsibility for the wall. Considering that relocation would probably not be an option for the developer, staff sent a letter stating that if the property owners refused to accept responsibility, then staff would recommend vacation to Ciry Council. Last week staff received confiraation from ail property owners with the exception of one who has refused to cooperate. Staff is attempting to contact that property owner 1n an effort to avoid vacation. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 13697 - DALY HOMES MARCH 7, 1990 PAGE 2 In addition to the above, an existing CCND water vault is located within the Haven comttunity trail gust south of Carrara. 'fhe improvement plans indicated a 4' clearance between the wail and the vault. Even though this condition was met, the as-built condition was unacceptable due to the vault being level and the trail being on an approximate grade of SR resulting in a large obstruction. ?he developer was advised W reloca*.e the vault. The developer contacted CCND and they advised the developer and City staff that relocation was not practical. The developer was then advised to construct the top of the vault at the same grace as toe trail. ngatn CCND advises stall Cnat this was not practical and instructed the developer to fence around the vault. CCND believed a liability exposure existed if horse and pedestrian traffic were alt owed over the vault. Staff reQuested a letter from CCND confirming their concerns. After receiving the letter, staff advised the developer to provide an as-built plan to be reviewed 6y the trails cow~ittee. The trails committee concurred with staff recommendations and the developer's engineer was contacted Lhat day to make revisions to the plans. The revisions were FAXED to staff. Corrections were FAXED back and the developer was told he could begin making the corrections in the field. Staff has been holding two houses pursuant to Resolution No. 88-557 until the above Items have been resolved. The developer states that improvement Bonds were submitted to the City when the Improvement Agreement was approved. Nhile this holds true, Improvement bonds are trot related to occupancies, but only to guarantee the construction of the •'s Ccfa~;t IIII~1I VYq~G11W VYG W YG~G VYcI Respectfu 1 fitted, `_ ~' / ~_ Attachments is ~ r (-. i ~~ ~-~ ~~~ )-1 CITY OP RANCHO NCAh1ONGA r,•. o...:. e,,, ao- e.,,,n,. c~,.m~~y., ui~,o.,,, ar:~ -,..-•~ ~•=~ ~~ December 14, 1989 C.M. Engineering Associates, Inc. P.0. Box 6087 San Bernardino, CA 92412 Attention: Stephen C. Pleasant, Principal Planner Re: Tract No. 13697, Daly Homes In response to your letter dated November 15, regarding the block wall constructed within the public right-of-way along Haven Avenue, the City has researched your request for clearance and has made the following determination. First, Engineering approved Improveelent Dl an Drawing Humber 1243-L clearly shows all Mock walls to be on private property. All Engineering's actions have and are being based on said aDDroved plan. The contractor/developer failed to obtain a penett and inspection issued by the Engineering Division for work within the public right-of-way as required pursuant to General Note 17 on the approved grading plan. Had the contractor/developer applied for a permit, the application would have been denied, and he would have been advised W construct the wall outsfde the right-of-way. Failure to apply for and obtain a permit issued by the Engineering Division results in all other peratts and approvals befog lrrolevant. TMs lady seen like a hard line; however, the city does not want the maintenance, responsibility and liab111gr of privacy watts. It 1s a9rced that if the wall were to remain in the right-of-way, the C1Ly would have control aver 1t. Although this may be desirable, 1t is more desirable to not have the liability exposure. Your point regarding the building parwtt inspections and approvals are welt taken, but there are several problems. The standard drawing does not indicate Lhe wall's location with rcspett to the right=ot-way. The standard does not address all possible locations and 1s intended to show structural features of a wall. The copy of the grading plan 1s not adequate in depicting the exact location of the well. Planning's approval relates W archttectursl features. Engineering's approval relates only to other requirements that may be required as a condition of approval of a building parwlt. ~d~ .n... mrmNr. v,,. ~ Wilh+m I ,11u.andar ~~ Charm 1 Buyuer 11 a uu,+a• Drum, 1. Sraw Deburah V Bruwn PamrW I N'nxhr Ia[k Wm. ~ICn L.M. ENGINEERING ASSDCIATES, INC. / TRACT 13691 DECEMBER 14, 1989 PAGE 2 Approval by the Building and Safety Division relates only to architectural and structural as indicated by the gnnmv.d etawg. Vh.n reviewing your letter of request with all the affected divisions, it was determined that all parties involved believed that the wall would be constructed on private property. Ai though, the City is sympathetic, it cannot assume responsibility far the wall being constructed an public Droperty. As stated earner, the wail can be removed or an Encroaclnaent Agreement can be executed with each of the affected adjacent property owners. Assuming that removing the watt is rat an option and if the developer obtains written denials from the property owners stating that they elected not to execute an agreement, then staff will recowaend that City Council approve vacation of that portion of right-of-wqy. Prior to staf9 making a recowaendatton, in addition to the denials signed by the property owners, the developer shalt also make application, submit fees and provide documentation, i.e. legal descriptions, plot plans etc., for the Droposed vacation. If you Dave any questions, please feel free to contact me at 989-1862. Cordially, CDMIIUNITY DEVELDPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIYISIDN ~~~ Monte Prescher Public Norks Engineer MP:sd l~3 `l\~ February 23, :990 City of Rancho Cucamonga Past Office Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Monte Drescher Public Works Engineer RE: Tract :3697 - Haven waii Agreement for Erc roachment into amity Easement or Right-of-Way Dear Mr. Drescher: Enclosed please find the original copies of the letters signed by the homeowners accenting the easements. The homeowners that have accepted are as follows: Lot 31 - Mr. & Mrs. Jeff Chen Got 32 - Mr. & Mrs. Arun Sanghavl Lot 36 - Mr. & Mrs, Douglas Warner Lot 35 - Daly Homea of California, Inc. The homeowners fcr Lot 33, Tanya E:•aroff a.^.d Paul Wahnman, have decided not to take a position on this matter. Enclosed please find a copy of our letter sent «,, rh.m nn Fnhr»arv la. 1990 and a coDV of the original letter sent to the original buyer, William Angel, on January 16, 1990. Upon your notification, we will have the homeowner sign and have notarized the "Agreement for Encroachment into City Easement or Right-of-Way". If you need anything further, please give us a call. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. sincerely, DALY ROMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. ~/ r ~~i ~ i n v' e .~ C1- lif.A.R-tl"l ~ Carol S. Nale for Tom Jonea, Vice President of Construction Enclosures HAND DELIVERED ~~ January 16, 1990 . Daly Homes of California, Inc. Attn: Michael Nimon 10483 Carrara Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Nimon: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested Daly Homes ..f ~eylif0^IIia .. ep3rs __ ".~.g.-a2 .lent - Encroachment" on the^City rof Rancho~CUCamonga approved form for the existing masonry block wall located along Haven Avenue. The Clty of Rauu... C -aW- .._ .-- accept the wall into their right-of-ways, .even though the wall was built to the City's specifications and in the correct location. This Agreement of Encroachment covers only the wall from "face of wall" to "back of wall", approximately six (6) inches. The homeowner will own the wall and accept certain obligations, as explained in the Agreement for Encroachment Snto City Easement Right-of- Way. All requests must be received en or before 1/19/90. If these requests are not unanimous between all homeowners, then the City will have tc go to City Council and prepare to condemn said property to the private individual homeowners. Please sign and return this letter to our office in the enclosed addressed, stamped envelope, Sincerely, DALY MES OF C~LIPORNIA, INC. ~~C //f-T~i, V~ Robert N. Burke Director o! Marketing We accept requested or easements DALY MOMS 0 AL., INC. ,~~i Michael J. Nimon President Date~.~~L) We reject requested easements DALY HOMES OF CAL.,INC. Michael J. Nimon President Date ~d~_. January 16, 1990 D '^ ~~'~ JAN ~ 7 ~y~p i) `... u DUI Jeff Chih-Ping Chen and June Ming-Ying EFie'R 5231 O2ark Mountain Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Chen: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested Daly Homes of !`ali Fn.~nia rn_n _ na..~va..~e..r ,.c c nnrnarnmcm" nn the Citvrof rRancho Cucamonga approved form for the existing masonry block watt located along Haven Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not accept the wall into their right-of-way, even though the wall was built to the City's specifications and in the correct location. This Agreement of Encroachment covers only the wall from "face of wall" to "back of wall", approximately six (6) inches. The homeowner will own the wall and accept certain obligations, as explained in the Agreement for Encroachment into City Easement Right-of- Way. All requests must be received on or before 1/19/90. If these requests are not unanimous between all Homeowners, then the City will nave co go co City Council and prepare to condemn said property to the private individual homeowners. Please sign and return this letter to our office in the enclosed addressed, stamped envelope. Sincerely, DAL HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. ~~~~ Ro ert N. Burke Diractor of Marketing We accept requested or easements eft f Chih-Ping Chen June Ming-Ying Chen Date we reject requcotcd easements Jeff Chih-Ping Chen June Minq-Ying Chen Date /Q `~ January 16, 1990 Douglas D. Warner and Cynthia B. Warner 5291 Ozark Mountain Piace Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Warner: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested Daly Homes of California, Inc. prepare an "Agreement of Encroachment" on the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved form for *_he existing masonry block =11 located Ong Haven Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will snot accept the wall into their right-of-way, even though the wall was built to the City's specifications and in the correct location. This Agreement of Encroachment covers only the wall f ror„ "face of wail" to "back of wall", approximately six (6) inches. The homeowner will own the wall and accept certain obligations, as explained in the Agreement for Encroachment into City Easement Right-of- Way. All requests must he received on or before 1/19/90. If these requests are not unanimous between all hpmcnWP.e rS, th °.^, the C_~y w... have to go tG City Council and prepare to condemn said property to the private individual homeowners. Please sign and return this letter to our office in the enclosed addressed, stamped envelope. Sincerely, DALY H/gMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Robert N. Burke Director of Marketing We /acce here ested or / ~i i,~ e~e~~~in K A~ ~s D. Warner Cynthia B. Warner _ ;7 3 0 _ Date We reject requested easements Douglas D. Warner Cynthia B. Warner Date IV / Januazy 16, 1990 Arun R. Sanghavi and Nayana A. Sanghavi 5251 02ark Mountain Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. S Mrs. Sanghavi: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested Daly Homes of California, Inc. areoare an "Agreement. of Encroachment" on the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved form for the existing ~riasonry block wall located along Haven Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not accept the wall into their right-of-way, even though the wall was built to the City's specifications and in the correct location. This Agreement of Encroachment covers only the wall from "face of wall" to 'back of wall", approximately six (6) inches. The homeowner will own the wall and accept certain obligations, as explained in the Agreement for Encroachment into City Easement Right-of- way. All requests must be received on or before 1/14/90. If these requests are not unanimous between all homeowners, than the City will have to go to City Counoil and prepare to condemn said property to the private individual homeowners. Please sign and return this letter to our office in the enclosed addressed, stamped envelope. Sincerely DALY fiPMES OF CALIFORNIA, iNC. Robert N. Burke Director of Marketing We accept requested or We reject requested ea,se5den}.~ easements Arun R. Sanghavi Nay a ~A/. lS~ngha i Nayana A. Sanghavi Date Date /~ V Februzry 14, 1990 Tanya Evanoff Paul Wahnman 5271 Ozark Mountain Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Ms. Evanoff and Mr. Wahnman Enclosed please find copies of our letters to your neiyhbo rs with regard to the black wall on Haven Avenue. As you can see, the homeowners of the four other lots involved with the wall have agreed to sign the "Agreement of Encroachment". We would like you to reconsider your decision not to take a position on this matter. Should you decide to agree to sign the "Agreement of Encroachment", please sign and return the enclosed letter Lo our office in the postage paid, selt- addressed envelope enclosed. Thank you for your consideration Sn this matter. Rin~e~nly DALY HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. /i' Robert N. Burke Director of Marketing RNB:ch Enclosures ~~9 January 16, 1990 Tanya Evanoff Paul wahnman 5271 Ozark Mountain Place Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91701 Dear Ms. Evanoff and Mr. wahnman: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested Daly Homes of California. Tn~ nrenare ___ ~, A.jreemenr ..f c„....,, ~,-time„r„ tie riw ~ c< -_ - aCUCamonga approved form for the existing masonry eblock wall located along Haven Avenue. The C±ty of Rancho Cucamonga will not accept the wall into their right-of-way, even though the wall was built to the City's specif Scatlons and Sn the correct location. This Agreement of Encroachment covers only the wall from "face of wall" to "back of wall", approximately six (6) inches. The homeowner will own the wall and accept certain obligations, as explained Sn the Agreement for Encroachment Snto City Easement Right-of- way. All requests must be received on or before 1/19/90. If these requests are not unanimous between all homeowners, then the City will have to go to City Council and prepare to condemn said property to the private individual homeowners. Please sign and return this letter to our office in the enclosed addressed, stamped envelope. Sincerely, DALY H HES O/F////C~ALIFORNIA, iNC. Robert~N.~ ur e' Director of Marketing We accept requested easements or We reject requested easements Tanya Evanotf Paul Wahnman Tanya Evanoff Paul Wahnman Date Date /30 January 16, 1990 %-~" ;'~ ~ ~(,~/~: ~ ~-y _ ~ ~/ i ~ i (, 1{ ~ ~ `~ ~ 't `-' William D. Angel , ~ . 5271 Ozark Mountain Place ~ 'j y ~ *`. - ' ( ~ _ ~.• ~~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 ~ - _ ~ I (C ~~~~. ~'_/ I /"/'i .~!a ,L_ Dear Mr. Angel: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested Daly Homes of California, Inc. prepare an "Agreement of Encroachment" on the City oY Rancho Cucamonga approved form for the existing masonry block wall located along Haven Avenue. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will not accept the wall into their right-of-way, even though the wall was built to the Cit_v's so_ecif ications and i.. the correct location. This Agreement oP Encroachment covers only the wall from "face of wall" to "back of wall", approximately six (6) inches. The homeowner will own the wall and accept certain obligations, ae explained in the Agreement for Encroachment into City Easement Right-of- Way. All requests must be received on or before 1/19/90. If these requests are not unanimous between all homeowners, then the City will have to go to City Council and prepare to condemn said property to the private individual homeowners. Please sign and return this letter to our office in the enclosed addressed,~stamped envelope. Sincerely, DALY OMI~CALIFORNIA,'INC. Robert N. Burke Director oP Marketing ~"~:', ,^~ ., We accept requested ': or easements v William D. Angel - .,~ Date we reject requested easements ~~~, William D. Angel Data 13~ CIVIL l FNVIIIONMlNTAL MGINlfl11NG ~sxiixssuxc A~NCIArs{, >txc. LAND PLANNING AND iURYFYIND FAX (7133 88i-bii3 (XERO% TELECOVIER 7010) GATE: G ~ ~ 7 ' ~ J TIME: PROM: S 4 C .Q,a S a H} INSTRUCTIONS: Cc 7v~ .lao~s /~f/,, ~o~l~~ TMIS OOtL'gENT CORTAINS _ ~ pA8E5 INOLL'OINL TN'u' wYEn SiiEEi~ aae ~. Aavon o,.. r.o, e!! ron, wl ~ ~,! . fnH w!w No wNl vm! w!y . Mllrow Clore . P.O. 1a Z,0l, v.„!, CYlhimi! ilbml9N•~Ngn! (C h 7NAN0 ~11J~e ~. c` cl ~d ~ r ~i) 1( ~ ~ T y 7 6 5 I~I,n.u I/n. ~. .I 1. _ .l PLANTw+IG LEGEND ._._ , v (~--OOI~.fI'O .t1.:i0R2.Li. - iOCt W,0•.H: .vi ~...i.:~- . ~:aT~ ..w . Y=v-v.v. ~wasi ~r17'[GOOYM 7'Ct•IY 'i~Ji'i DO/o - ~ip'i ltl(r -iSl'OOOMM ~~ (N) YWIIrO r(/o~ 6 ttiuw.l2ii ~ l'-e' O.C. Ncflp ip NM 7{S!t•YrY l~/Ci ~ 1T O.C. /,ou ~oui, t~~ ror - Iw rutl a w n+tr» up:~o w~-ncw orwo - ®tl~o rIO c»~ opol~s tuo I twu.a ua ~ a~.a- o.c. twofrwo ~~~ (~8~ U BEi~lJ1AL Na'YES; •~pttt TO tom! L-i I'OR /IJ11t2t+0 0{S~IL• • iVi! 1'0 itlQ'!' [r7 r'tfl OpOAL Ip'rtdta YD q/CIrICliIt7lti. n 1 oasaarTaa of ~wsaN 1 ~•*~ L-*^_ ~ I CITY Ot= RANCHO CUGAtMONGA ~ HAVEN EQUESTRIAN E8TATES TRACT 13697 -RANCHO ~~` pALY HOMES ru ~w+iu rKNC. twnc wf 1~. MMQO QtGwaA~ C~ ~Orff ~q rfNN APPROVED ~If: /Y/G/~599_ / OAR: OIIN111 JON IUMMAN • M 1/Irti~111f /1~lR~ ~~ i1~ ~il~ i1~~1» (U.r-1r~ 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga TELECOPY Tekphone:(71/)989.1&51 Fu: (714) 987fi499 TO: STEVE V~LE~15~r FROM: ~/1U./i E ~2E~SCl~ElZ DATE: 2lL ~/9 0 TIME: l~% ~f s sus.IECT: ~K / 3 ~ 4' 7 NO.OF PAGES: (incluiina tltir met Fkax call (711) 9av-lssl, exten.kn probknu in reoeivin` tbbr tnnanlMm. J3~ u~, a lee.e .n ,ny Tf'T ~-~~~ C~ Ir`z i ~IN"~' ILk 32 LOT 31 VENUE LOT 35 ~ur's?eIRN ~i};L i ,Q, BX;cvINE NOW FT,~; P••=________ i,, B"CU26 FRCE•• r!RVEN AgV'ELN~U E `~T.~ u.u ~. \ ~.. GiH~~i~ ;~ ~_ smc w,.~x •` U t .~,if•.. _ r~~.;j 82.27 T.C. • 81.808.C ~3 ~Xisrwc v.~T ~oc,~rioN i- ~ ` HAVE]V AVENLE Menke - uwE ~v,M zFV~sE -uE vwtis ra < ,., i ,,,~-..~~~<~,., ~~ TRAILS AOYISORY CQNITTEE CQMEHT SHEET PROJECT GESCRIPTIDN: Tentative Tract 13697 - GALY HOMES - A residential subdivision of 47 single family lots on 29.9 acres of land iota Led at the southwest corner „f ~, moo., ,.,,o.~,., ~.,a ,,.., .. ;...,.... COMMENTS Shown on the attached plan there is an existing utility vault located in the subject parkway. The approved revised landscape plans show the vault to remain with a minimum clearance of 4 feet. This plan was revised by the developer due to requirements of the Cucamonga County Mater District. Attached is a letter from the O1sLrict indicating why the vault could not be relocated and the need for fencing. Engineering staff is in agreement with the Distrtc is letter. The proposed design could be improved by removing the fence adjacent to the street, landscaping the triangular areas and installing additional curbing (see attached plan). Prior to requiring the developer to provide revisions. Engf neerinq Staff would like the Equestrian Conwiitees toatments regarding the width of the trait by elim ina ling some landscaping next to the masonry wall and modifying the plen surrounding the vault as described. Action: 13~ I _ r I -- I~ E / N - • fin) ~ O °1'tLl 2 ~' LOT M s ~'~ - ~ 35 ` U I' 1/~v/{ _' 0 i m I .. 1 J~f 1 PLAN ~,r/sr.~v~ r~uir~co-~ee~J w.• .,~~.,, „~,~,,,,,~ AS QP//LT WATT SE~2V/GE lr/s-!/LT .. r~~r~~ OACy.VOMFt T~iC.!!iT NO. /!Gr^J7 rrwir.rrrr rw '~7 Fr A i/ ~r N A V E N !/ E C~D CUCAMONGA COUNT`F WATER DISTRICT •eu ftn f[11r tt0iNO e0 . cVC/.x ONCt ctLV f~`aa 'JSaf . YO foa a]e • n• sf7.. ffl December 4, 1989 .~ RO[[RT N[UIRD V4..IrfM4t1 [N[RLY [. aM D[N .1enWn. C•ewfl Y~~wr LLOYD W. WCNA[L RneYn CNARL[f A. W[fT O[ORO[ A. KUYK[NDALL N`"~ City of Rancho Cucamonga •~,~ Engineering Department ~ ' P. 0. Box 807 R Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 - ! Ey ~.. .~ •.^ Attention: Monte P[escher %! ' Re: Control Vault at Southwest Corner o.~<~ ` of Haven Avenue 6 Carcari Street ~`r ~'~ °'~ '., Dear Monte: The District has reviewed the situation with the concrete vault and its close proximity to the equestrian trail. The vault can- not be relocated to a.^.o ther area as it provides pressurized water to a specific area and the vault's location is controlled by ground elevation and the existing water system it connects to. The vault cannot be lowered unless all interior piping and valvi ng is lowered accordingly. Landscaping around the exposed portion of the vault would be acceptable to the District. Because the vault is in an equestrian trail, the District requites that the vault be fenced in a manner that will prevent horse traffic on or across the vault covers. Equestrian traffic over the vault presents a serious liability situation, If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, COCA}4QfiGR COUQ7SY WATSR DISTR2C'P ~~~~~ - -- mea H, ine, Jr Engineering Depar ent Supervisor JHC:b cc: Daly Homes -George Guiders 13~ Fe bzuazy 27, 1990 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga. CA 9777n Re: Tract 13697 Dear Sizs: Daly Homes of Calif oznia is requesting to be placed en the City Council Agenda for March 7, 1990. The city is currently holding two hostage lots in the above noted tract. We request that the city council consider this to be an "unnecessazy hazdship" to Daly Homes, thereby zeleasing these hostage lots. 1008 of all bonds axe cur zently being held fox future zepairs that may arise, in addition to the hostages lots. All other improvements that have been requested have been addressed and Daly Homes has acted in good faith to expedite the cmm~lati no ~~ nc~cc im...,..,...~,...4.. We appreciate your time and consideration in this matter. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, DALY HO OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (~C Yq .~e~&-~c ~:ao a,m. 0 ones V e President o£ Construction TJ; tm X39 __ ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION DF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ONE-MILE SPACING BETNEEN INTERCHANGES ON THE ROUTE 30 FREEWAY REC01lENOATIOM: it is recommended that a resolution be adopted to indicate to Federal authorities that a one-mile spacing of interchanges on the future Route 30 Freeway is essential to the City's transportation program. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Federal Highway A8ain15tration has made the determination that the Route 30 Corridor would not be considered urban even in the forecast year 2010; and has made the determination that the Route 30 corridor interchange spacing should, as a result, be restricted to every two miles. Actually, the areas along the Route 30 corridor in San Bernardino County are rapidly urbanizing; and tho Cnutharn fal tfnrnla Accnciated Governments has forecast a significant increasing growth within the corridor. Development planning along Route 30 has been based on one-mile Interchange spacing for many years and to change the interchange spacing from one-mile to two-miles now would severely impact the City's circulation and growth patterns. It is important, therefore, that the City ,iotn the Board of Supervisors in opposing the Federal Highway A6einistration's designation of the Route 30 corridor for Lwo-mile interchange spacing. Respectfu su fitted, /_~-~- 1 - - ~ R ~:PR:d~ Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 90 - „ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION'S DESIGNATION OF THE ROUTE 30 CORRIDOR FOR TNO-MILE INTERCHANGE SPACING WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration, Region Nine Office, has made the determination that the Route 30 Corridor would not be considered urban even in the forecast year 2010; and WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration has made the determination that the Route 30 corridor interchange spacing should, as a result, be restricted every two miles; and WHEREAS, the areas along the Route 30 corridor in San Bernardino County are significantly urbanized; and WHEREAS, the Southern California Associated Goverm~ents has forecast a significant increasing growth of urbanization within the corridor; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has passed a local 1/2 cents sales tax measure which will provide a majority funding Por the construction of the proposed Route 30 corridor; and WHEREAS. Y.hp fi Lv of Ranrhn h,rawnnna~e lnral n/annlnn alnnn onn_tn 7n has been developed based on one-mile interchange spacing for many years; and WHEREAS, to change the interchange spacing from one-mile to two-miles now would severely impact the City's circulation and growth patterns; and WHEREAS, the initial study has indicated unacceptable traffic volumes will occur around the proposed two-mile interchanges; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY opposes the Federal Nlghway AAminlstration's designation of the Route 30 corridor for two-mile interchange spacing; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLYEO, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, further recommends the Route 30 plan to reflect one-mile interchange spacing for the Route 30 corNdar tfirouah Rancho Cucamonga. ~~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90 _ /I ~~~ w 7 ~`y ~ N,Y" ,~p,~~ ~~~.Y~~O~v r f`lfi.9' p " !Wade urban ESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~ THE CITY OF RANCHO D ADMIN~TIONISOESIGNIITIONIOF THE OUTE~30NC0 RIDOR FOR fit' iN0-NILE 1NTERCNANOE SPACING MNEREAS, the Federal Highway Adainlstration, Region Nine Office, has the deterisinatian that the Route 30 Corridor would not be considered even in the forac.er yea.. pm n. _.d MNEREAS, the Federal Highway Adninistraiton has iaade the determination that the Route 30 corridor interchange spacing should, as a result, be restricted every two Rtles; and HHEREAS, the areas along the Route 30 corcidor 1n Sen Bernardino County are significantly urbanized; and a slgnificantEincroaslnsg~gro thCofiurbanizationiwlthi^~Lhefr r~,ontjdors and~ast MHEREAS, the County of Sen Bernardino has passed a Coal 1/2 cents sales tax neasuro which will provide a n.~ority funding for the construction of the proposed Route 30 corridor; and HHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucaapnga's loal planning along Route 30 hat hw.n rMvet nn.A A. ..w .. _ ~__ -.--- ~.. ..--...~.i@ in~,~~aa„yf Spacing rar M^y years; and now would everolytliyact~LMie C1Tyts etarculationtand growth patterns; amend les NNEREAS, the lnittal study has indtated unacceptable traffic volwas witl occur around the proposed Lwo~il• inter~hanges;;~~ wBdtW-~tM City of Ranolln Cygaepwo~ pay e1{~eyaep oppelAetW1. City taaourc.s „itpkw tb.U a0rr#gevf:. M~llt';ANail/_M,~'li'11". dei{~p„atlon pllx ewes aateatroyhlc aoeee~fe aeiieequanoee !o Ranc+ao Caoadionga. HON, THEREFORE, TIRi CITY CWHCIL OF TiE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, HEREBY opposes the Federal Highway Ad~lnlstraLion's designation of the Route 30 carcldor for two-ails interchange spnting; and CUCAMONGA~f rthe~r nca~di~Lha Route 30 pC011HIC2~ rofl~icLlone-iHie~~ intareMnga spacing for tM Rauq 30 corridor through Rancho Cua~onga. ~ I~ KANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE; March 7, i990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: GISCUSSION OF MALATHION SPRAYING AREA HIDE ~. ~1---- The purpose of this Staff Report is to provide information regarding the spraying of malath ion. The State of California has established a "medfly tra Sler" location at 6th and Mountain in Ontario. The purpose of the "medfly trailer" is to provide follow up after spraying has been done. This follow-up includes placing traps at various locations and, then, checking these traps on a daily basis for medflys. Additionally, the i.^.d iv i^uais staffing the "mad fly trailer" answer "general" questions regarding their operations. Don Henry, a Deputy Proj e[t Director for the State of California. advi<ec rhar Rancho Cucamonga did receive an application of aerial spraying in October, 1989. Subsequent to that spraying, the State released approximately 20 million sterile flys up through the first week of January, 1990. Mr. Henry reports there has not been a reoccurrence of Lhe medfly in Rancho Cucamonga, nor in San Bernardino County, since Oc Labe r, 1989. Mr. Henry did provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a Med fly Status Report which includes backgrou nd, trapping, regulatory, sterile releasing, detecting and aerial treating information. Also included was the March medfly treatment schedule. This information is attached for your review. Also provided for your review is information on what other communities positions are with regards to the spraying of malath ion. The City of Los Angeles nas proposed number of ~Ncr, items which support Their position of discontinuing malath ion spraying. These are attached for your review. Also, Councilman Hach's office advised the City of Los Angeles filed a lawsuit on February 22, 1990 requesting the spraying of ma lath ion be stopped. The suit is pending and the City Council is still considering the recommendations made. Malathion Spraying March 7, 1990 Page Two The City of Pomona passed a Resolution (attached) opposing the aerial spraying of malathion on January 29, 1990. Also, the City of Pomona filed a lawsuit to halt tiie spraying on Fehroarv 1h, 1990, The lawsuit was denied xnd at its February 26~, 1990 Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to join the City of Los Angeles in their lawsuit. The City of Rosemead passed a Resolution (attached) at its February 13, 1990 Council meeting requesting the aerial spraying of malathion be suspended. The City of Ontario prepared a report on the safety of malathion and a Resolution urging the State of California to re-evaluate the alternatives to combat the mad fly infestation and opposed the aerial spraying until further scientific evaluation is available. This information is attached for your review. The City of Chino directed staff at its February 20, 1990 Council meeting to prepare a report on the safety of the spraying of malathion and io provide information on the latest research regarding malathion. This re Fort is to be presented at the March 20, 199o Chino City Council meeting. This information is Drov ided as a samolin9 of arfinnc r.4e~ ,tea ~_... surrounding communitfes in regards to the issue of malathion spraying ~^~ Respectfully Submitted, i~. '. ~~ , n Olane O'Neal Adminfstrative Analyst DO/dgo Attachments 1~3 f1FR t71 '9C1 1444 ~~c,. ~~~~)q87- ~~~9 P.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ { ~ ,~ ~ ~ "~" d7' d9 ua~c~EZ~, ~(' &18 l~52-053' ~ ~ ~ ~aatn: ~oN N 171 e. d n et jJ0' ~~ ~ (OT ~oN~? _ ~NCgMw~44 EYmn6a of fPayu: (Jnefadtny l~4pays). PY1A Ot '?0 la:4a F etruar. 2'S. 1990 P.2 5t~tus F._p~art 6 a<:unr,l,~and ;7:;u:~ J:..1+ 3`r:-:9, [na u. -. car b::er'.~ - .r ;.r. .. ~..r ,..,..., . r:nltfurr i.:. Cc: ar *_ment cf-Fop and Agr3cu.l t;ar a~(CtlFA';, ~ar•a^__un`a '~--=r r. c,rn__ cF Aori~-:x1 r::.rE r.~!ve been in~/rived to Mc•r, tarrnne>n Frutr fl Si'i ,41 y1 er =d u.=.t 1~r, Proi?~;t5 in i_r_s Ange; e?, Santa Cldr [l, 52.": ~r-rnard1n U, 2nd fi dnG e^ L'OlInt125. 'rhd =~~ st -l•/ •.:a=. apped rir: )U1y _^, 1487, rear Uodc:er S::aJi ::~n in Li/s Angel et County. Inta si+:ad trap of n9 cauq.^t sa'/ar.a mare flies o~i Er the ne::t few dB is Ultimately 4:r flt~s ware trapo Etl. ter, t„E ad'~i ••=E of the Sciane ndvtspry F'ar:rl (3AP1, we 6ggan an er ~•7 i!:attcn orecr3m Pnn si =_ti a cF a slnpls aE+-t al applieati an of ,:..iathinn :,sit ~ni 1•; wr;d b~i r_l ease of sterile fries fcr twp P1atl4i•r c-a:~.°rciCl OnS, T{-,ta or r~Ysm Wa.i cUmpl gied Sr: SaPtsmtar, ,, .,-- enrt., it .run Jst and D'cuntat r, Vt sw .., Sant:.-.. C. ar ?L:r. ;>. _..._ yl';,:^t.:i zf of e." i~r,l and arsaJo= .San 6grn,rd1 b E:)an arduicati on Ue. r,g the hedinninq ~~r, October <~~ wh2 or Lns ?,noel _= County, wa sr_a tf.c-red luc ations +,hr ough ar a,xs. :.: d,a'e there ar= t. (y /; mor ,TFerrh Holly:,+n od• F F'uc~:/Sutltr, I=asadEna, Br ee/t_ l:6 wn Q'J: !dOrWai'l. lrwird 3i2. Pumonar. opteml?v~-r f1i25 werE CrdppE' in CoL.tn t,. ~r. .- th5 gal darn ^ark. Lns r,gFlei Cuun tv. and iri th_ J C•-.n,yn t'r. lr. all of thrrsa cn~±m=, we rogr a,~l described aGOVa. How•avcr. a fly was trapp od ir. the Syim::r art? g t. r, tU tf dp +L135 to W1•]~1V t the less Anq ales and 17r anya Ca_Lnty ftaan separate treatment locations drama City, RcSOmead /Manravla, F_ael= Habra, Sputh Gate, Glendora, ~rdugo Hilts, Gartlen Groves and 7hF supply cf st erila Matlfl USDA/COFA l~br_r story in Haw apprp::i mat sly lOD million f ad.it [tonal fit as par weak a The er:paneion ^f the pr ogre 9t al-ilt Medfll ES, With th i. the CAF ,sn Dgrgrnh er 7 to oh r_ar,duct of t?+e program. The SAF rec oirnnsnded ttrat th flia5 (Galdwtn Park/Valinch should continue to rvicel ve bra treated with multiple ae mixture through two Medfly panat'3 rxc ammentl ati ohs and P_ach Snf asted area is e,~pac T>Sesa tY ~iatme,~t3 am pl anne Cacemcar through March, and es is. a ISmitad rgaourc e. The ii has a capacity of producing less weakly. Appr o;!i mat ely 6p milLion o available from for •iyn Sources. rapidly used the available supply of in mind the USDA and CDFA Cpm/gn od aSn their recort,mendati ohs far the sa areas already recel wing sterile Whittier, L'pl and, and Mauntaln 'JSawl hem. However, all other eraa5 should Sal appllcationc of mal athlon bait ife cycles. The Protect adoptetl the has begun eeri.al bait treatment. etl to be tract ad eight to 12 t1,i+ew. cnce a~ierv three weeks d;.+rlna every other weak. in Ppril and 'lay, ~~ MRR al •qa la: a= a.a arG weal%ly dear ;.nq June 3`790. Aari al and qr a~_~nd treatmen? consists of acol ying a mi,:t x of 2.6 oz. of mat athion and 9.6 o~. of pro*.ain bait per acr . Attachment 1 liF[s d=. .Ya Angeles Crnanti es. 'i hF, r_DFA mai r,talc=_ a cagoar for Maditerrenasr, fruit fly ir,f astation in tl-:a st e. `.a. tlcc4.a fir Orange anG Ln5 Tea-pL,i nd ive stata;'c oun[y tracpino ercar;•n o provide early datecti on :+ any Trap: are 'm.+n ~3 in host tr 3ll9Ceptli)le areas and ara the Vcar. at sped 'i etl Densities 'in o acted weakly or bi-weakly through Int.en si~. r; tranping lv t!iyq~rad wh a•r a single fly ix trapped. Follcwi r~q cgnfir,natvan •.~= t e so ecimen, trap tlensi tins in tna r, •.-,re souarY r.~i la are in_rea ad within 24 hours. Jac Aar.~n traps =r•a ul ~~er] over an fll saucer Ifi115 area !n a i,G0-50-2v-1+i arrsy. -r..;-, in the •rora nd :e ara ar 1•i ced daily for tna first week. Traps in thn_ ei uhC aia!•.ars ~i~•1a5 ar o!~.nd the cere ara GarviceC per ;~ twu days. pll ether ceps are checked at least once wikhi r•. the fir ak :•+SeF:.. All [rape ra then sarvicetl weaY.ty far Cr,r se i?f5 Cyci a_= r•4 ti~a il/ Ueyc~~~ Lnc' laec fly ucLs~lc.i- ?n additi•~r to `h:s •7 !'son raps. McPhail kraps will ha increased u'. t-ne c.rrz square rniIa tr. ~ traps dtr square milt. Thew ~c(~'~at1 traps baited with M Lure, will he checked daily fur the rirst wank ynd wtel:.ly there ftar. Cnca at eryi4 fly ralvasea b gin, Stainer traps ars olaeed at per square mile with 2;. per cquare mile on the eterily release borders to monitor tho numo rs of sterile ralvaae flies lr. the wild fty an vi ronment. Td tlata there are 26,Bri7 tr pD placid within 1,6EV cquare milcc rAoproximat sly 1,3 milli en creel in Las nngelea, San Earn ar•tlino and Or anne counties. 7ha b aatcd own by county and trap types are d3 icilUWSo Les Angeles Ce. ac keon Trapv 20,311 cPhail 427 keiner 1.572 San BernaY dino Ce. aekeon Trapv 860 cPhail 0 teiner 377 Orange Co. ackson 3,117 cPnail 143 teiner a I~~ ~, .~ 01 ~_ 14:46 To pravant the Mediterranea frgm whara they were fquntl, EncomoaSSi r,g garL cf tha t 9C;Q ayG a'r,_ mi.l?5 3:^. Cr!r_ !j lld i6 In Or anO? Cc. and =JJ 1!1 'and 9~` ail 3nL'" 13 an '_I I"i]2 nq ila]Ur 'h O'vT prod v.C Pr3 in 1 es5 tF an CO :> ogres of host. agpr U;i Natcly ar:~) acres in 6arnard3r,q ~_v`. For any cf the crops tc be treatment is necessary be, madfly- ?heae trPat,aents they c~'a13~-, batt sprays. To dace th are arE a total o '?g 4;: .at i':n 'with ea^_h GeinG USCG/CO=P _~nd tha owner. T our 3.=ries. pr,~duc ors dowry t *_he a t±ss. The ma~oricy o Fnpalea Cc. - 2,869 and *.ha San Harnardin4 Cq. - 5.'.. Thar-s hava dean over Z, 5'v0 Ga3ny h•r csacu*_?.y in court. action and posavbla fines, Sac attachment M2. Feather tool in the fi'aht a~ -0lias relaasad in large nurtd lar•~ae have Deer. datectod. and aircraft. Tha ground r areas whara most of the inf le di atributed avanly over million fliaa par square mi veniclaa and 250,000 per tq att achmant A2). P.4 fruit 43ias from artifically mcviny quarantine area was sstaGii shed ee cr~untiss. Currently thare ar? n i~l~le dre4 - OG/ if' Ld5 ivy a:co :G.. n Har naYdl no Cq. ThE BritlrE ar 2a 3 nd11?trial eriJ ir4'n mein, T;lare ?r? s area. Within the quay=.n `.ina aroa, rgos are raised in Los Fingel e Cc.. ~nae Co. and SJO ~cras 3n San vested ar~d moved, an aopreved they can Ga r_artified fraa from Ga fuini gati.nn, cold traat moot or i4 3,2^<5 estdhlishments ur~d ar der comp:i once agraemant between se esr::.Glishments range from qr oc er'. =r trap en o: tatigr, c?r~tors. the indi v3dual push-cart vendor 3n thASa eataGii ah manta arc in I_e3 amai ntler are ir. Orange cc. - 3pg sod anti ma 'diO:dtiGna 3aEUed Wltr~ 1 rs ara 9 okh ar caws pending court @t arile Falwase inst madfly is the uae o4 si.arilE rs in the areas whara wild fliaA and pis 3s acne Goth oy ground vahiciaa aria of .art is cancantr afed in core ~t+tf ~n canters. The aerial rataaca ~• antirr aroa. F rte nimum o= ono ' par week ara released Gy ground ,re mlla par weak Gy •ir. fSae I I 01 .. 14:47 Tha fallowing summarizQ the to date. Gr cuntl Ral vase Ar as cover atl (aq. mi.> Nc. flies released - Aar:}. al __,e i~s~ hlo. flies rel¢asetS - Te date, there h. a:.a tFen wil three co!~.nty area follows: Cioi~n tv, No_F1i e? Los Ar,q elan 'clysi 3n F'~r'r RO All Othsr 20~ Or anCe 3 San Bernardino 1 P,5 o~ tns starilo release progr 5rt~ - bl 6..;85 ,oillicn - 1[3 90.124 millicr ec ti or. flies antl larvae dtteeted. In the Larval Nile _gmm,~ Praaertlea 01 162 u 4 to 43 1 7 19 O O 26 TOTAL ^<49 ~ 133 66 rig MRP 01 'E+0 14:47 I P.6 Attachment I 1 n, aurrl r-^ rp _ __ T - _... ~.. _= t iwl_3 Drain L:r: To Data Trc:ted 9yl mar 17 10 980 4 2:19/90 . can Dram] Ib In ^sn - -~ CirV North 14 8 460 ~^.,/79l9:7 HGi1;'W'OOd F';aad~ne i7 ~O 803 6 ,/~;?; q;; Rn semaad ;~.'.r .,5 920 E 2/21!90 Irwi ndelw ^] 1.° 440 ~ 2/12!90 Doanpy 46 29 44U ., ,,, ,~; qrj .. ~~.~tnyaFg 48 30 7^eU :~ 2i 14x90 G1 r.nr.-.ro 18 S2 °n6 T a, .2/~. @rEa/"LaHyp_ra 79 12 16U v 2/12!'90 Hai„r~.t; Verdugo Hills 3U 19 2U0 2 2/22/9V Fomdna 11 ~ 04ti 1 2/15!90 GF.ANGE COUNTY " rex"/LnHibra 7 4 4GU v 2/12/90 Helghts Garden Grove 36 2, 040 2 2/18/90 FEMAkY.S: 1. San Frrnando Valley: i.^. lud=e ~','t mars F';.nera:na C. tY anu Morth H~]13 ywacd '~reatman ~. Gl sndora= includes GS an ors and Hrse/"LaJjg~ra Hel ahts" trQatment blocks in Lca ngeles Ceunty~ antl "@rea"; La Habra Hsi gnty trsatm~nt locks in ORANGE COUNTY. ~~9 MFP, 01 '?0 14:48 y _ - . } ZZ >N~4~O~U~>Sf ' .2 l '. < Ga~.s m ~ ~ ~3 x ~4~~: ~° ~~a~c 'o .~.^ a; ~ ~~s ^ M Ko ~~ O • } ... -`( H H . ; 8 S I '~ P,7 ~5 V N • ~ _ _ 01 n 14:~ NEWS Release Medher. anean Fruit FH Feature United States Los Angeles County DepeAmant of DepantneM of A9dcuNwe AgrkuAtre CalHOmia Orange County Department of DeparoneM of Foal and Agnwtture Contact: Gera Curry or --~---~eb~~' 22, 1990 Pwr....t q~p e.a _,___ - 6~_,l+~t .- r___. ____ MARCH MIDFLY TREATMENT The March schedule for eradication o£ the Medite today by Leon Spaugy, Los ..ssionax . ion bait applic?tio^. for the fruit fly was announced Cosnty Agricultural Cotmn- Approximately 383 square involved in application a weeks, The specific date inQ to the wren involved. 4Paugy said that if the to wezther conditions, local media. The treatment achedula for i wuui or uii,,,lrar arcs/ i.a 2. Downey 3. South Gate 4. Garden Grove (Grange C 5. Sylmar/No. Hollywood/P 6. Pasadena/Eagle Rock 7. Rosemead/Monrovia 8. Jerdugo Hilla 9. Irwndle/Glndra Brea/Le; 10. Downey il. South Gate 12. pardon drove (Orange G s of the Loa Angeles beam are lathion bait once evOry three each application varies accosd- application must be postponed due ~s will be announced through the March is as follows: araHta 65 aq mi Mar S, 1990 46 sq mi Mar 6, 1990 48 aq mi Mar 7, 1990 .) Pomona 47 sq mi Mar 8, 1990 norama City 47 aq mi Mar 12, 1990 47 s4 mi Mar 13, 1990 53 aq ati Mar 14, 1990 30 aq mi Mar 15, 1990 braHts 65 aq mi Mar 26, 1990 46 aq mi Mar 27, 1990 48 aq mi Mar 28, 1990 .) Pomona 47 sq mi Mar 29, 1990 '~ I CITY OF LOS ANGELES ~~ L~J CA V r/•V\ From: The Office of Cifiy Clerk Raom 3>i8, Clry Hall, Los Angalas, CA 80012 Tsisphona: (213)485-3686 FaX: (23)237-0838 Date:. - / [~ - RO Tlme• : `/ S 70: Number of Pages: c ^ Special Instructions:. Arun: LJIQnc o~ ~t ~.a~- i 'a n~-~'Co~n r~.i ~{-e-2. ~C.O-'~ MP.r.~a~,,, ..1.~_ -~i.~.t..c Go ~n cl~ m~ 2.- ~0-40 , ~ gQe-+ rile Na. 84-566 TA TNR Mr1NnTe_ nz .,,NR ~ . CITY Or LOS ANG8L.89 Your AATA, NBALTN i ADMANITZBE COVnittee reports ne follow ; Yss No Public Comments x ARTS, HEALCH AND HUMANITIES COM.M ITTEE REPORT relative to the issue of aerial spraying o." Malathion in the city of Los Angeles. Recommendations for Council Action, as developed during tsseimony prompted by the Motion Iwachs-Picuet regarding public hserings on the issue of aerial spraying of Malathion ir. the City of Los Angeles: 1,INSTRUCT the City Attorney to pursue ell appropriate legal acticn, including lawsuits and administrative mppeele, to: a, temporarily halt the aerie! spraying o! Malathion until its use is proven sale b, cause a the State to conduct an up-to-dote independent expert Yisk asaeaament study c, in the interim, increase the use o! ron-pesticide alternatives to combat the Mediterranean fruit Ely infeetetion. 2. SNVITE other concerned mur.icipalitiee and governmental entities to join in our legal actions. 3. INSTRUCT the Community Development Department to work with the Los Angelso County 9oard of 5uperviaors to implement plnne whereby the homeless receive both adequate noti £ieation of planned sprayings and safe shelter during the •prayinge, 9. DIRECT the Department of Recreation and perks and other City departments which maintain outdoor public fecilitiss, to immediately implement n program for cleaning outdoor feeilitiea following aerial Malathion sprnyinge. H- iNSTR9CT the Airport -d Harbor D6pdrtmonEi to imoiwmwnt a program Eor inspsetinq packages and freight, end to pool informational aign^ warning of the danger and prohibition^ ageinat lruit importation, 6, REQUEST Chat the V,9. Postal Service inspect all lizst close moil for the presence of the Mediterranean !roil Ely, 7. REQDE9T the State to undsrteks a current study by en independent bodx to eseertein she effects of ec tinuad Malathion •preyln on public health, and that the study be published and sub~ect eq~4r rsvisw. 8. REOVEST the Governor to lmmed lately form a panel o! medical doetore to advise the public shout the e!lecta of Malathion eorevinq~ and thnt thu ~. ~ be ~~ ~ ~. 9, REQUEST the State and County Health Departmente~to eotft ynuously monitor the public health and er,vironmeneal of"acts of khe aerial eorevir.c oroeram. 1C, REQUEST the 6tate to reverse its pzioritie• ar.d release existing sterile Medflies in urban tether than agricultural areas. --. -•°•:: ire ~[ot Lu increase the production of sterile Medfliea andVir,.p lement~an ongcing research program regarding eradication methodology since the Medfly may become resistant to current eradication practices, ::, REQUEST the Sta*.e to plan long-term eradication elforts which wculd take into account t*.e probability o! periodic infeetatione. 13. ENCOCRAGE the State to look to the agriculture business community to fund laboratory far.ilities end services !or production and research on Medfliee. 14. REgUEST the state to openly hold public meal inge o! the sciantifis Advisory Panel in Los Angeles. 15. URGE she State tc incorporate research regarding alternative methodologies _nto its long-term gleaning projects and eradication plan. 16, That the City continue to hold periodic public maating• in conjunction with State and County agencies eo that residents have an opportunity to express their views, and ao that the State and County can present their plane and positions in a continuous exchange of information. i7. REQUEST the respective profeaaionel organ izatione, such ae tho Los Angeles County Medical Association, to diaaeminet• information regarding the effects of Malathion to their membership, and continually monitor the health el Let• of aerial Melath ion ^prayinq. 18. REgUEST State licensing agencies to incorporate information on the effects of Malathion taro continuing education end certif i4atl On prOgrame.I- - 'T / on D camber 15, 19 a otion (wache-Pi was introduoed regarding city Council hol ng f 11 public he age r the pu a e! rho ughly axe ping th issue of sial •p ying of ^ln hion in the Cit of Lva gele^ •nd wee refs ed to the Arts, alth nd Hum attics mmittee. 5 At 't• re let meeting n .7a ary/Z9 1990 he ta, Heel end Hu nisi s Committee me fo eight and one- elf hours, ell wing all pr ant o addzete the tree. Teatimon a e received tom ra •e tativaa from the Celifornie Departm n of Food and Agr ict tors, Lo• Ange lee County Deaartmant Health i , 1 ~. CITY OF POMONA -.t...:L~ .. .-.. - THE CITY OF POI~I:UNA Ftb <,pw*:{ '; ;L'SG.a Off.ce at 4e tlr.~ C'n rk Gr. t:erY of i ywb,"y ~",f T E L£ C O P Y T R A N S M I T T A L 8 H& E T TO; Giana O'iJea1 TELECOPY M: (714; 987-b499 A°. :,~Ci tJ ,;< 9ancho Cccarorca TELEPHONEt 989-i95I FROFi: ,".'.!y C1e+'k'S 0``ite TELEPHONE: 620.23Ci nT: Clty of Po,tona TELFCOPY 1: (Tta: R9+..e+^^ ' TELECO F'i OPERATOR: Cd YOl ine tOTAL F1U!fBER OF PAGES--?his Transmittal Sheet plus 2 pegee UATE: F_e~'-~~YV 16.1 QO TIME: 9:00 A.M. P.M. NOTES: Rani , .inn ":o QQ-17 ! ~~ I n' 'Ld [tl°" ' n~'. 4~~ ".~, HJ Ibne•nA l 1 nITY 17111 R71A~INi RESGLJTIC~R NO. BO-1? A RESOLUTION OF iPE CCL'NC:L CF THE C:TY OF POMONA, CALIFDRNSA. CP POSING N'19r aG9raL ep~ Ytt;D ~r vn• n - - - --- A :CGUe ~He Lua fiY.'vEL~J CuUN TY 9ECA L'SE OF A PDTENTI AL~SERIO US~dUMAfI HEALTH HAZARD, AND URGING THE 30'dE Rf~OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFCR N;A TO DIRECT A THOROUGH STUDY ?ES!':':^'G LN CONClUS;7E NEDiCAL F'NDI?IGS REGARDING THE MALP.THION E%~CS!RE AXG "UMAN HEALTH RISKS. IHEREAS, the Council cf Lhe City of Pomona shares the conc¢rns of other cities and elected 9ff~t'a's in !a5 Angeles County that ev¢n though the ~"edf!y is threatening our fn; its and veyetab les, there is a pot¢nt1a1 serious Duman health hazard :vith the aer!a' spraying of Malathton Insecticide; and ~dHEP.EAS, conclusive medical findings regarding Malathion exposure and the patent';' of human health hazards have not yet been made; `ION, 'HERE FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Pomone, Caitfornia, es follows: SECTIO^! 1. The Council of the City of Pbnona opposes more aerial spraying of Pal athion Insecticide in the Los Angeles County because of the potential serious human health hazard, end respectfully urges the Governor of the State of Califdrnla, the Honorable George DeuKme,llan, to direct a thorough study resulting in conclusive medical from en. ~.~•.a~.. 'hc ~-•••~•~ _ ..,~ ,,.,o~nivn eeyusur¢ one human nee lLn riaka. SECTION 2, The City Clerk shall certify Co the passage and adoption of *.h!s reso~ution, and it shall th¢reupon be in full force and effect. APPROVED ANO PASSED this 29th day of Jan_~~ery , igg0, ATTEST: I/.eX.rYi1,1/~- -'Ci er THE CITY OF POMONA By~~G leyo ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' ~- i.5(P y ttorney CITY OF ROSEMEAD JEYM1.S Me WYP•~ Y..°" ~ ~i~~ ,. ~oses~ead , M: YM MO iFY oEOU. - _. gWM~KYFN oeEP• rv :a, ern y BB99 E, VALLEY BOULEVARD • P 0 a0% 399 _eQ ~~ 'n:~on-~ ~ RUD[MtAU. GAUFVRNIA 91TID TELEPHONE IB1BI 29B~8B71 TELECOPIER 9/83079218 February 26, 1990 At their regular meeting on February 13, 1990, the Rosemead City Council took action on the attached resolution and requested that a copy be sent to you for your information and consideration. Sincerely, l ~ ~/ ~ii 9 .,t 1 ,v ,~IC2 WMNSR City Clerk City of Rosemead Attachment E.26:1 E.26:i I ~ ~i ~~iVfl' ~~T RESOLUTION N0. 90-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF ROS EMEAD REpUESTZNG`THAT TlIL•. AEAIAL APPLIGTION OF MALATHIOI(. ZNSECTTCIDE BE SUSPENDED IN UJS ANGELES COUNTY ~ IJXtAiAS me m}~nic n! Fh_ --- -- , _ _______ _ _ importance o[ Cali[oznie's agricultural industry ~and~the davaat 'ion that the neditwrrenean Fruit Fly can prang; and IINPREA3, State OwpartmwnY of Foed and Agriculture officials have adminlate nd the aw ia) snraylnT o aldt.`.im ;:aac:ic ire .. various parts of Cos Angeles and Orange Counties in an attempt to eradicate the neatly; and NHEREAS, a public concern has bean expressed that the [e :.iay be 5@C1oLL9 hedlth dnd flnVi[onm@n[al cons idirdtlenS LRpt have noC b@en properly or adequately addressed toga rdinq the repwated appl icaticn o[ Hala tnion; and NREREA3, tnere is a spacial concern regarding the snort and long tors nealen wt[ects Nala[hion say haves on well ch ildran; and NHEREAS, the aeabara of the Rwwmwed City Connell ful strongly eRnt it is the rupenalbillty of government to protect the publ is Malth, safety and wlta n. NOH, THEREFORE, bw it rweolved by tRw City Couneil m! the City of Rmwmaed as follova: Swctlon 1. Nwmbare o[ Nw Aeaemwad City CDgbcil Mzwby Cormally raquwwt the state of California to aoapend all aerial Halath ivn appllcatlons until lndependmt and [ellabL anslyab haves coneluaively aRevn roar Na latRion Ls net hasardeus tc the ,`.ealth mP humane or to the env irenmwnt gwMrslly. Section 2. Maabwn o1 tna city Count 11 hwzeby utge tow state of Callfoinla to vigorously sewk albrnat lvu to aerial Ma lathlon °r••r i'n •"~ ~waewnc moa aa<ernac zvwa to proGtt CRe Stan's important egrl<ultural indY/try. Bwetlon ]. State and Caunty ottleiala era urge0 to institute a compreRwna ivw p:tbitc educatSon Dtogns rwgwrdlty the Medld rranwan Fruit Fly, its wtadlcatimn and lnaeetleidee in order to increase thw public undwrstetxllnq o[ ell telatsd laauo. Section 1. Tow City Clerk L herWy dirwcbd to provides ea[CSt1ed cepiu o[ cola Rwsolution to gevwrnor Gorge Deukse}ien, United Stabs Swnaton Alan Cranston eM Pob Nilson, Cengreasaan Matches Nsrtinez, Msemblyvemen silly Sannwr, Nw baque o[ Callforrla Citiu, and the California Conerwet Cities Auoc is lion. Se^ct!cn • TM Neyor, or Drbidinq of [leer, is herby direcbd to affix nL elgnstun to ehL Ruolution signity![g lta adoption by tow City Council o[ tM City of Roswwaa, eM ere Clty Clerk, or her duly eppointwd deputy, le directed to attut thereto. 1 PASRIp; aPwnvrn axn Ampm- _.".!a r-.. -[ F:~ ua zy', i - . ~` rr Nl1YDR i Mnbl ewrel ly teat eM ton{e1n{ 4aolueion No. 90-I3 A1TE$T: vu dull W n{uLely sdeptM bl taw Cley Counell of eM CRl o! Ueeaawd a[ • n{uler wmtim{ tMno! Mld as eM J6..3 ~= ~'==+'-' - I]ta d9 0[ hhrwrl. 1990. bl eM follovta{ log: ¢ITY CLAUi Tb: MCoeka, boor, McDOneL, {rweea. IaperiQ M: Mane Abwv[: Now Abauin: pave Ci22~ Lt~~ ~v Scate of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS City of Rosemead ) I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument is a full, true and correct copy of the original on file in this office. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hCd~,n~d~a~n=d"~'a~f-fixed the seal cf the City of Rosemead, this ~_ day of z J 1990. (C ~2 GCS ~~'c (. t.~w/ C ty Clerk E.41:8 !59 CITY OF ONTARIO o~,tAR,o t ~ j CITY O F a~~ .>'x O N~'I` AID R I d JOJ EAJT 'B" STRSET ONiAR~O p'W~~tA' CAL!FO4MA 9V6~~1196 pU1 9d6~1!Si r OU.tp7 iv ^.'. ^:VNJ ~' A,.SWj _..~ rf~ v~, '1 nJa ~t+~ ~E'.^.P i E 44*E4B~;~ wL o; Vrin ~. °~ . a 3EiC~`P V:`. ~ / ~ Ci+ARLE$t MIlMUf4 .`. •~.. cr. m.« PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL A8 SOON AS POSSIBLE ~~ ~' ~ FROM: `'~I~u~`1~1~_ ~~ - - COMMENTS: (M 41Y1 NUMBER OF PAGES: 5~ _ (Including covot pays) J OPERAT ; L' PLEw9E NOTIFY OPERATOR IMMEDIATELY IF >y¢j RECEIVED PROPERLY: 714.31.2610 w r~ r r r r r r w w w~ r r w w~ r w r r• w r• r r r w r WHEN SENDING USE(/T~EL-EgCOPY NUMBER (714) 3y1•D8g2 r w w r w r w w r w r~ ~i 1, r r w r r r r r w r r r• r r r u: -. .-.. . _ .... ... ..-... - -.... -... ..._~.. _ MEMORANDUM TO: ONTARIO CITY COUNCIL FROM: DENNIS M. WILKINS, CITY MANAGER DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1990 a ~o~~~~; MALATHION Attached Ia a report on the safety of malathion prepared by the Library Director's stall. Then la also a resolutltn which will appear on your ev9nlfl9 agenda My orifice has comacted a number of cities, intU~ding thoaa mentioned by Mra. Schwarz, who have taken a positbn. Essentially, k requests that spraying be suspended until en updated study re published. Attachment 'lP( ONTARIO CITY LIBRARY , MEMO __. vennis Wilkins, City Manager FROM: Sue Jackson Luce, Library Director DATE: FPh ~,_. r'; , 1S>G SDHJECT: Surmary of. Research on Safety of Malathion R E Q EIV E D CITv CF C~~'A?10 ~. ;r.u,~~s';,nr r F`_J i ° 1390 AM PN 7i8~9iW1U)12)1)2~3i4i516 A summary conclusion from recent studies is that malathion has the potential tc be a toxic hazard it ingested in large or concentrated amount s, or if the subject is exposed to it in repeated sprayings, The ecncontration amounts typically sprayed in agricultural use are usually ao low that the harard factor is negligible. Repeated sprayings, however, may cause symptoms that frequently manifest as derma± ~_^; rc~rL aLwcy irritations, with related symptoms manifesting as headaches and nausea. The answer to the question o! whether malathion causes genetic mutations, cancer, or low birth rates remaln9 inconclusive, with a number of research agencies (governmental and privates) agreeing that a number of further studies are necessary to determine the true toxicity level of the chemical, we also checked with the League of California Cities office. Sta!! said they had no list of citiea's stands on the ieaua of malathion spraying, although they have had numerous inquiries. They referred us to BellllOwer a9 8 fe110w inquirer. The Bellflgwer ,P.d.;,iniatialor gave t.*.8 following information; that Nozwalk and Monterey Park have passed resolutions banning Che sprayings Orange County voted to continua aprayingt Glendale and Bellflower Are voting on resolutions February 12, 1990; Los Angeles City Council MAa to discuss the issue today, February 9, 1990. ee comuaented that essentially the resolutions asked for a hold on spraying until the state agency report (in process) on malathion gives conclvaiva evidence on the health risks, ~~ T0; DATE: Page 2 Dennis Wilkins, City Manager February 9, 1990 s^,ackoround The preponderance o£ reports on malathicn toxicity Generated during and i:n,r.ediately after the whClesa7e ~_rayin3 =mar mecav in the early ;°80'3 concluded than rti. ~ „-;,;,;uv was relatively harmless to humans who came 1n contact with it. Environmental pesticide was relatively harmless to humans who came in contact with it, Environmental Protect!on Agency atudiea determ!red that even under long exposure, field workers using malathion were at minimal risk. More extensive, laboratory originated atudiea by tF.e EPn concluded that malathion was noC readily absorbed by the ski r., and death would only be the consequence of a person ingesting a substantial quantity. That malathion was (and is) a toxic agent was not disputed in triese early reports, but the general consensus was that at the low dosages used to control medfly, malathion was completely harmless to humans. Concerns about the long-term hazardous effects o£ ma'_at.*.icr. reached Snto a grey area reeding more re8earch. Particular concerns of malathion as a carcinogen were dismissed in a number of testa which Indicated that, thovgri a potential cancer-causing agent, malathion had less potency than saccharine, a substance still commercially marketed as a sweetener in 1990. Conr..~ •cr malathi nn a. =n !-w::~r. „( ivircn detects were s19o dismissed, though the competing studies in thin area were generally vague and inconclusive, There were a number of independent tests, most notably by Sumner Kalman, professor of pharmacology at Stanford University during the late 70's and early 80'9 which SntlicaCed negative results, mainly in the sabstance'a abi).ity to alter chromosome patterns, and to increase antipyrine elimination, but such effects occurred only at high dosages. Studies for Lhe late 1960's paint a more potentially hazardous picture. while malathion is still considered a "safe" agent, it is recognized ny a number of governmental and independent agencies ae a genot oxie aubaC ante causing respiratory and liver damage, particularly for those whc come into repeated nr grold.^.gcd content w'_t.*. it A recent study (1967) by the California Department of Health services indicated malathion as the posa!ble activating agent in a number of say Araa birth defects. The EPA has atlmitted soma of Lhe early atudiea proving the relative harmleesnesa of malathion were flowed by argue that the chemical is still the aafeet pesticide to use in human inhabited area9l however, they also have atlmltted that this statue is not as firm as once thought antl that further atudiea era needed. i (~3 v ~ ~ EESwUI2uii iiGe llthiT A RE90LUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF TMR CITY OP ONTARIO URGING TH6 STATE OF CALIFORNYA TO RE-EVALUAtE 7116 ALTERNATIYEA TO COMBATTING MEDFLY INFESTATION AND OPPOSING AERIAL SPRAYING UNTIL 6VRTNEfl SCIENTIFIC EY ALUATION F9 AYAILA3LE 11ryCREAS, there continues to be a seriou9 cancarn ezpresaed by the o ittzens of the community of Ontar to about the long term effects en Humans bnd Ebe lnvironment rasulting From cor.t In ued mal aehion epraying Eo aombec the modfiy lnfaatatlon; and MHEREA3, the City of On lane Eel Saves further scientific evaluation Ss neresnary Grior to the ponducting of Curthar sari al spraying to combat Che mad r'iy infestat Lora; and VNEREA9, the health, Rnl fare, and quality of life of thv m tizena of the CS ty of Ontario i9 of the greater[ condern to ehe City Counc ll of the Clty of Ontario and prior to the conduating of any aerial spraying, all raaaonaDta ^lternatlvaa and all health ecnaideratlon} should be fully azpl orad and evaluated prior to the enmmenoer~ant of aerial aprayi rag. NOM, THEREFORE, 2ItE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITT Of O1ITARIO HEREBT RLSq.YE3 AS FOLLOYSt 1, Tnat ch0 Callfornla nofort-=,-,; „~ r`ood and AgrtcUlture Se hereby urged .. ,v-nxamtne, ra-evaluate, and revise ite approach W combatting madfly infests Eton and explnrv all possihle alternaCivea Orior Ea the contlnuanc• of serial epraying in the SEate of Oa nfurni a; and 2. That the Governor of Callfornl^ be nquea tad to nave prepared a rsport of the effects on cities by the previous epraying on the madfly prior to commencement of spraying ir. the city of Ontario, i HEREBY CERTIFY that the forego ing reaolutlon Rae duly end regularly passed and adopteA by the city Council of the Clty of Ontario, California, ^t o reiul ar meeting theroof hold un tho ?0th day of Fehruary, 1990. City Clirk o the City of Ontario Y ~~, ~;, „~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Tn• Ma vnr Mum6or< n~ nno r;.y fn~inrit and fits Ma na nar FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Ci rec for BV: ,ferry R. Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING STREET ADDRESSING C~JCAMp ~j 1 f n ~; ,~ ' g ~Z ., I> 19]] I. RECOMMENDATION: It is reconmtend ed that the City ordinances be amended to increase the minimum size of identifying numbers for street addresses to 4" height for individual buildings from the current 3" height, and Lo require street addresses for comner cial/industrial buildings and multi- building complexes to be located so as to 6e visible and readable from from travel lanes of adjacent streets. it is also recommended, if the City Council sees fit to initiate a program of providing uniform to rb painting of street addresses, that guidelines be developed for its impiemen cation oy an rode pond env gun u~ec Lm . II. BRC KGROUND: At the City Council meeting of November 15, 1989 the staff was directed to review the rurrent street addressing policies and make recommendations to improve the visibility of identifying street numbers. Staff and the City Attorney's office were also requested to review curb painting of street addresses and block numbering of streets. III. ANALYSIS: As a part of the staff report submitted for the meeting of November 15, it was suggested that the current requirement for size of identification numbers (3" high) might he a contributory factor in making street addresses difficult to discern. After further review of conditions throughout the City related to commercial and industrial buildings and multi-building complexes, it appears that the current practice of allowing buildings Co 6e posted such that their addresses are ~V I bi< di i'%cria Ji ••'tiiin mplix may at ~v 1~n r of r, bl~fin~ tI1 illP situa ti on.V Accordingly, it is~staff opinion that an increase in the minimum size of numerals would help to make individual premises more identifiable. Also a program undertaken as a part of the development review process, that would make more specific the loca tf on of numbers so as to be visible from travel lanes of adjacent streets, would improve emergency response services would improve traffic flow and make it more convenient for citizens to reach their intended destinations without conflicts or confusion. An example of such program might be a requirement for addresses to be posted on a monument-type background Staff Report: Re sidentiat and Commercial Building Street Addressing March 7, 1990 Page 2 adjacent to the street frontage(s) for multi-building complexes and/or further inc rea ssing number size so as to be more readily visible from the t hroughfare. In regard to curb address painting in residential neighborhoods, the principle aspects discussed by the City Council were issues of whom should Dh vsically perform the work (City forces, contractual agency, community service groups, etc.) and how payment for the work might be ar miirrd lf.ity exonn se solicited donation, direct tharae etc.). Many painted curb addresses exist throughout the city, apparently the result of enterpriz ing groups or individuals however this issue has never been addressed in city ordinances. in other jurisdictions, service organizations have undertaken the task, which, if such an approach were initiated, would necessitate preparation of procedures and guidelines to achieve uniform results throughout the city. The City Attorney has provided information from the City of La Mirada, (attached) where a private company paints addresses on all curbs paid for by the City. In Lhat program, all premises are uniformly identified, it is controlled by the City and there is no solicitation of funds from property owners. In regard to an appropriate location of curb-painted addresses, one immediately adjacent to driveways appears to present the least- nhctnnrtivo coot cinnln family na ci d..nf ial c rn rh mintinn in conmlercial, industrial and multi-truild ing locations, in staff's view, would not tre a viable program, in light of the likelihood of traffic and parking obstructions. A program of increasing the visibility of street addresses from travel lanes as outlined above should provide the desired level of improvement in access for those areas. A final issue raised in Council discussion was that of block numbering of city streets. Staff's view is that attempts to place block numbers on curbs at intersections would tend to confuse motorists looking for addresses and contending with on coming traf Fi c. It is current public works policy to provide block numbers on street-name signs at all intersections except those of short, local streets (usually cul-de-sac) or those that occur between evenly numbered blocks. New signs and those that are replaced due to damage or attrition now include block numbers whar, e. - possible. Over a period of time, all s -- t nave signs (except those mentioned above) will have block numbers, therefore it is staff's view that this condition will ultimately be diminished. /w Y" Staff Report: Residential and Commercial Building Street Addressing March 1, 1490 Page 3 IV. SUMMARY: In summation: a. Easier and more timely recognition of street addresses would be possible if the size of numbers for individual properties is iric reassed tram O" to 4" ir. height. b. A program of reviewing numbering methods of commercial, industrial and multi-buiidina projects during the development review process, for visi biiity from street thoroughfares would improve access and traffic flow. c. Curb street numbering would least impact city forces if done through private con tractu ral services. d. Block numbering of most streets is currently achieved by providing block numbers on street intersection signs as older signs are replaced, intersections not currently so designated will ultimately be reduced. Respectfully Submitted, ~~~~~~~~ ,- Jerry'R. Grant Building Official RG:JG:11 1(v ? FEB-29-90 WED 19:19 CITY OF Lq MIF2gDq P_02 9.50.0:.0--9.50.040 w Chapter 9.50 ~i:vG v: HOCSE NC:I3EHS ON CL'BBS Sections: without permit. 9.50.020 Business license required. 9.50.030 Minimum s*_anda rds fcr ourb numbe rin^y. 9.50.040 exceptions. 9.50.050 Severabiiitp. 9.50.060 Civil remedies available. 9.50.070 Violations--Penalty. 9.50.010 PaintinC of house numbers pn curbs prohibited without permit. No person, Eirm, corporation cr partnership shall p nt, stencil or otherwise marR upon any curb, street, roadway, alley or sidewalk within the city, any house number cr address without first having received a pe rnit therefor from the environmental services ma racer or his designee. There shall be no fee for such permit, and the person, fi rr., ce rpe:atien o: carne:ship applyi.^.e for such Permit Khali submit written authorization from each cwner of property, .~ ne rmitting the placement of house numbers or street address . on such curb of the location in question. (Ord. 367 §l ipart), 1966). 9.10.020 9usiness license required. Any Fe rson, `_i rm, Partnership or corporation engaged in the painune o` ~xcse numbers or street addresses on any curb within the city fcr any remuneratipt., whether by donation or otherwise, shall be recuired to first obtain a business license From the .`inn nce manager. (Gr3. 387 §1(part), 198fi). 9.50.030 :7inimum standards for curb numberin House numbers or street addresses p ace on the curb ace shall be of black paint in figures three inches in height and im- presse3 upon a background of white pal at a Tinimum of five inches in height and eleven inches in width. The background shall be refiectorized throueh the use of class beads cr - - i.aG atiectc tired rna to riai Ter.+r i~a vr_ocriinn •ho -_ standard specifications therefor, ford. r387 S1(part), 1986j. 9.50.040 Exceptions. None of the pzovisiona of this chapter shall apply to the city, its officers, agents or employees, and house numbers or street addresses may be placed upon curbs by contractc rs employed by the city. !Ord. 387 §1(parU , 1986). ~~ 140-1 !La Mirada 3 d^) FEH-28-90 WED 14:19 CITY OF LA MIRHDH P-03 9.50.050--3.52.010 9.50.050 Se verabil'~ty. The city council declares that should any provision, section, paragraph, se:;tence er we rd -_ s _i'.ap:.c: ue rendered oz dac_arec Invalid by any final court action ir. a coact cf competent jurisdiction, oz by reason of any preemptive lecislation, the remaining pro- visions, =_ectiohs, paragraphs, sentences and words of this chapter shall remain in fu~1 force and efiec t. (Ord. 387 §4. 19861. 9.50.060 Civil remedies available. T.he violation o`_ any of the provisions of tClls chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the city through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary cr permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. ;Crd. 387 §J, 1986;. 9.50.0;0 Violation--Penalty. Zt is unlawful for any perao~Irm, partners I? or cor?oration to viola to ary provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this chapter. Any person, firm, partnership or corporatior, violating any provision of this chapter or Eai ling to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed y-uilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprison- ment net exceeding six RICnt.19, or by botr, such fire and imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partnership or cor- poration shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for nh nA un Aa nn .f:n •wn r_onF .. ~._ violatior, of'any of thenprovisions of this^chapter~is comb mitred, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partner- ship or corporatior., and shall be deemed punishahle there EC_ as provided is this chapter. ;Ord. 387 §2, .366). / ~ / CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA pJCAMO~ STAFF REPORT ~' ~ x Z _~ ... 1907 ~ November 8, 1989 ~... ..~;o ...c. :. cr., ... ...c :.. :~ ..c ..,,-.c,. a,'.,. .,. :y ...er agar FROM1I; Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: POSTING OF STREE7 NUb]B ERS 1. RECO,'vl'YIENDATION: it is recommended that the City Council review the staff report and accompanying data end, it felt necessary, provide direction to staff es to any further action. i[. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting o[ November 1, 1989, the City Council asked Cor a review of policies and ordinances regarding posting of street addresses for buildings in the city. Requirements for assignment end posting of street numbers were included in the Sen Bernardino County code, adopted by reference by the City, as a part of Ordinance 17, at incorporation. Those parts of Ordinance 17 remain in ePPect today. .After incorporation, and prior to organization of the Building and Safety Division, ass i¢nment of street addresses (house numbers) for developments was the task oP the County Surveyor's o[Pice. Soon after the Division was formed, transfer oC that responsibility was made to Building end Safety "in cooperation with the Planning Department" ea outlined in the county code. Enforcement of the Ordinance 17 provisions (presumably [or veri~n of installation) lies with the "[ire agency having jur fsdletlon". In addition to the authority o[ Ordinance 17, the Building Code contains provisions for premises identification o[ new buildings and the Fire Code has similar requirements for both new and ex istin¢ buildings. The Pire Dlstr ict has included the requirement on their Plan Check Report end reviews this es a part of their plnn check of ell but single family residential buildings. Single family dwelling compliance is a part o[ final inspection by the building inspection staff. 17~ StafF Report: Posting of Street Numbers November 8, 1999 page 2 Orcinfl nee 17 and Lhe Fire Code have provisions for contrasting background and Ordinance t7 establishes e minimum height of three inches for house numbers, although many of larger size are evident. All o[ fhe pertinent codes require legibility and visibility Prom the street :. ..u ::u5 :i~c ~.roycrry, niuwugii iiruinnnce i~ yror i~co ....- alternative methods. I[I. ANAL YSI5: By end large, businesses have a financial incentive to post visible street addresses, particularly small users dependant upon media advertising for attracting customers. Those dependent upon walk-by irattic for prosperity are less inclined to make addresses obvious to motorists. Regardless, obvious posting of the address of each property is a code requirement, it for no other reason then to facilitate emergency response by police, fire and emergency medical units. At the November 1 Council meeting, the opinion was _ expressed that a sign iticant number of bus)nesses do not- have street addresses. The small size of the identifying numbers (three inches high) may have contr ibu tad to that impression. [t may also have been furthered, although to a limited extent, :rom repetnt:ng of structures so as to reduce the required contrast between the posted numbers end their background or from damage or deterioration. Also, where multiple buildings occur on a site, we have allowed the posting o[ the numbers (under "alternative methods") so as to be visible Yrom the mein driving areas. It is also likewise that some house numbering that should have occurred under county jurisdiction may not have been eccomp lashed. Finally, it is possible that, although subject to application by dual agencies, oversights in posting have occured in the [i nal inspection processes. There bas been no ex iensive effort by city staff to determine to whet degree house numbers ere non-existant, but a survey of fifty-lour buildings teeing ease line Road, between Carnelian and Archibald, revealed only seven properties without reediiy visible addresses. Two were residential and the remainder were non-realdantiai occupancies, including Alta Lome High School, end the library. I7~ Staff Report: Posting of Street Numbers November 8, 1999 page 3 The r_ ^~r, three buildings were eonxtr acted prior to incorporation, although two of those have undergone minor remodeling. In addition to those without identifying numbers, tour single Camily residences (pre-ir.ecrporation; have r. urS ers ...... no.c uo.o: .G.u.a.. v, naro o«:. aou wb da• IV. SUMMARY: Based upon our preliminary survey end lack of any significant number of complaints regarding this matter, staff is of the opinion that current ordinances end enforcement policies are adequate to accomplish appropriate posting oP new construction. In the event that the City Co unail is desirous o[ undertaking a retroactive program for posting of existing buildings not complying with current ordinances, it is suggested that it be on the basis of complaint rather then e structured, systematic survey. It the Council is desirous of increasing the minlmum size o[ numbers to improve visibility, ordinances may be emended to do so. Respectfully submitted, rry .~n~f' -' u~l tog Official JRG:dm ~7` ~A+~.1 3~~ A2 rJ '>~% G Cam. C©~~ OF STREET NUMnERS 63.011 - 63A7a s nspter 7 POSTING OF STREET NUMBERS 63.071 Adoption of Uniform Numbering System,. 63.07' Designation a(Numbers. 53.073 Poisine Pequirement. ~~.~.r Size and Location of Numbers. 63.075 Ezerptions to Posting Requirements. 63.076 Enforcerrrcnt. 71 Adoption of Uniform Numbering System. The Board of Supervisors hu adoRted a unitortn system of house xring (or the unincorporated territories within the County of San trdino and such uniform numbering system has lxen made a part of the ral Plan of the County upon rtcommendation of the; Plmning 73 Designation of Numbm. Stmt number shall be designated and assigned by the Planning vtmrnt or other agencies in cooperation with the Plmning Department proved by the Planning Director. 73 Posting Requirement. Stmt number shalt 6e ronspicumr•t;~ y; :;~u on ach building located e unincorm.~led :,va or the County of San &matdina. U there is mom one building on a lot snd only one street number is deigned, the ar shall br pared on the prineipat building or the building nearest the ~7a Size and Loation of Numisen. All strtet numbers posttd punwnt m role chapur shall tntet me awing requircmrnb: fa) Number dull br no fen than throe (3) inches ie height wim . nponding width. (b) Number and 6ackgrossnd colon mwt be of etmtnating shades. fc) Number mwt be visible and idenUf46k from the stmet on Wldch suildint or 6uildin0 (tons. Idl When number an a building swuld not be rplbk from Ilse street to xtbaek Idisfance from stmt) or wadd otlxnvite be oWtructed, t number: may be Dated Ci: in independent sttllctUR such Y a pat, must cthrrwlx meet the requimtitenn of thk actloa. Nttmbea ported rata! boxes ax u:ttpt.bk under the plrrrYitxu of this mhsectlwt only ) no more Man one mail box U imtslkd an a dress bt. (e) Numbers pained at Curb are not at:aptabk ar a aubtltute tar ~quimments herein. 462.1 nagrnW ~~3 63.075 - 6).074 LAND 116E, BUILgNG REGULATOK 63.075 Exceptions to Posting Requirements. "- ,.a.~ nmrhoas or posun6 s[rcer numbers may h aulhnnn•d b, the enforcin6 agency provided the enforcing agency detennmes Ui,i 0,. method used complies with the intent of this chapter, which is to imurc uui all street numbers arc properly posted and nn be readily ascen,u,ed ,., those agencies chareed with grotectian ~f the public peace. hvuim .,~,,, and welfare 63.070 Enforcement. The Firc Chief, or his authorized representative. of the fire ,tn•n,. having jurisdiction shall be rtsponsible for enforcing the provuwm ~~i n... chapter. DIVISION 4. VALIDfFY OF TITLE 6 This Title and the various parts. divisions, chapters. srctiom and , burr, _ thereof arc hereby dedarcd to be severable. If any part; semence. pamar,pb = section or ciaus is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid. the murannln ~~t this Title shall nol be affected Ihercby. The County Boar) of Suprn ~w~r. hereby declares that it would bare parsed this 7itk and rach pan tl:rx:d reprdkn of the fact that one or more puts thereof M dr. l,n•d unconstitutional or invalid. /raarrrq 482.2 !7~ ,ulrnun ~`u.a... .car..e tfewtr awWulee a.r rir rdw ra f» aW.d r rt ow. , ;u slfr.. wtc eegoata, tppe.ae ,~, ar at!..ppwW rir. ro M prorrrro vrvr~;:.,. 7._~R_-.~..,;_._. aoclmdtW naWU frMMlrlon -~ !r. N.]M. Appmatl nr~ a rtira dWl k i~ a aq w r~ eenuq bilAn{t o rd . prilln r b le yiYYJ Mille r ~ lre me rer ar nd frvry r papwlr. 7af0 rrlre efrtl tam .f~ rr ~P~ 14yfMl fNe. Il.L1. Mrsnsar.iW.w.trwv~ wr..YydlMl Neese d rtrY apmyt r ~lw rrrY ratr Y raarf for YI- rti~vfY-II~r/ugeeee, rAfdrgw*fw.lgfarl.rrM r rrtwllrleah.. trl4lwial..owwrrbrarrrrll teat lqt r'r rwr7 rae r w~u b r t W f. gYM1011 ^ M{'fALLNItON AIA MNRlN~NC[ OF ~ y MOTECTION, tJ~l~MRTY tYS1BiM AIO A//LtANCq UIYftAln er N.s~, a17fw~+w~letlvrrrtylwrgp.tYi ~....._..- ~-~--•r~e ~. rl..~4r ~.:lttt r"~+r ivriYtr .~ s: Rl:.:~~t+ra nr as r'A. .eaae'iff r r wWw rerl9 d p.lelr iw, I~YiI r qf~f w rliel lrq*r. Atl aAYaeltY led.aAewwrfrrMwrr da d fb reef at ~M trr Millly a Prtr ~i i~ lM eAMrf t ~e wr e. r~efr.e w r r.arw .r u.~c. wf^r~ w. f ai ~.++ w+l. r ~w d. geafeb wrier il~ ~ ,r.~rfrlwrwrdr..rraalra+dr r +lr. mitt r fr ~nr Y rely ref t+..Yf f.r.f Seri ~ 1. geiM eni+4 d rrar iw eAN~e rr. rr r.. t~l d ltlYerrmgltll~or~ dYfrrre6.eYr~I~~ai,rwltlL r ~Yrr r.w YO' qwe. tryyt r flee. f4M ~ ~wlM fb edyelire, wiWe Mar lrelefl. fwrl~ eAS,.rd r ~ r~ie eetre, ra ~. flex, leM/rmt~ r b elred r lrt MsY IlwtrtliyiYr qrr. M1w rl qua w ilftleft. ~fl' Y lar mmtroeefarfp~.iri)e~eriYlGr~.ftr.i.tfae~rt r fvrrlef !Ir Nanld Awlrtlw.lw ulYwrlb f7w ~arie• a e111F Y I ~~ 311317 UItFO11M ~ItLDMO COOP is msWlcd m a sW I. GM bus shall Mve an ousaae Droners os saa leu Nan 1'~• imh nornwrt Wan I "~ imhesaM shill ponde •ckasaneeof 1'~a inches besvrcen the pab bar ,nil a0lacem surface. Gnb ban nsd sal be pronded m Group 0.. pivisson I aputmem Daises. 5 When n cm k ewDlidiM Nat the facilisies m usable by a person m a wheelchau. disssemions oNer Nan those above shall be accegabk. Ibl Anew to I~ralaeka. Mkrara aw6 Towel t7Yiea. In adser Nan Group R. Division 3: Group M: Group R, Division 1 apMrM houses and Gswp 0, Divisors 2 asM a srora7e accupncsn, toilet ream fiilisin sMll M i fdbws; I. E7ceq (or tlw projection of bowls and wane pphit• a eki uanhunscled SpC6 b IIICDtf N WIdN.191IkDe, to DCIdIIYId 17111e11ef m dlplh]DaR DC pNYlded 10der Y kW OK IiYNMY. 2. When msrrasa M provided, n kau arse slrll he scrolled w thn d1e bOllgll n(RK INilek i, WidYn a inCDM a Id r100a. 3. wlsele rowel andslisposd(inturtsartprswided, they shaODe ac<eisibkro she physically eaedkapped and at kanolwsha0 he wimietO itcAL Mlle floor. Ic1 Wahl FCW Wa. WDelc wMR (OYIYitl YC plWided. N kit wD 1bW love a spool W IsNn ll Inches of len floor bdshatl eareup`ftai, hadcpnasad conwls. When fa Wainaia kcasdm aoakove, dralrove YYO Dt11e1 Madsae )2 inche k wilhh. sill lYkoeoes. Whue ssuNk t<kohonn art proYidad, r lin acct shall b ~ insWkd so tlmt she hassdteb dkl a1W arose sxeira art wphk H inch M she Flan. Usihwcled aaeu wllkn'13 inNSn o(dr kkphor still De psovdad~ Sure accps shell be nil ki dwe 301oehn k width. CaRgIMMO Onto Sae, 513.7he troop asld hi0lin{ofcampnsted pies shaOcomplY wish the Fue Cask. hwsll~ IM111MIOMlOts Sat. fU. Appowd ielhit a tdlYesan t11W be ptovidod fi aR new buildolp k nod o poohka i w bt pkkly rifiNe aRd kpbk ADte she racer a lord Ro•y the psopity. ^ ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT ;` DATE: March 1, 1990 iu: idayor and members of the City Coo ncii FROM: Oiane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: TRUSTEE NOMINATION FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PATER COMMITTEE The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a member of the Southern California Water Committee, Inc. (SCWC) and as a refresher for the Cou nc 7l, a background information sheet on the SLWC is provided for your review. The SCWC has informed the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the three-year trustee term has passed Quickly and it is time for the city sector of San Bernardino County to once again elect its representa tlve to the Board of Trustees of the Southern California Mater Committee, The SCWC has advised that a City can nominate a representa tfve from its own City to serve as the trustee. The Coiam it tee meets on a monthly basin ar nivse r>~. ~o~u C{ou> unu, yeneraiiy, the meetings are scheduled from 11 a.m. to 12 p. m. The current trustee representing the city sector for San Bernardino County is Faye Da stru p, the Mayor Pro Tem for the City of Ontario. The Honorable Da sirup has asked staff to advise this Council that she does wish to 6e re-nominated to serve as the city sector trustee for San Bernardino County. Attached for your consideration is a list of all city sector members in San Bernardino County. from the nominations submitted, the SCWC will compile a roster of candidates and proceed with a hallot-by-ma i1. ,Respectfully Submitted. ~~~~~"~ ilia = ~n ,.., neiiii ...__.. 0. N=u„ rw a>~,a~iVC Wild ly5t DD/dgo Attachments 7 50111NERN CRIIfOpNiR UNITER COMMRTEE, INC. 1775P SM'PItIW CiRCIE • SUffE 1P0 soam oc musrcFS ~KVINE cRUFOwaH oe7t a • n asst -7466 coum ro. a. x w.. o~ c..a..r.M.~ rd. M,In a.,m v.. ao•.., m..,wn...u. ,.o,,.~,,..:.....~ <.+.Vw sv,age w+a.. w.., um,. w. a.~eew. mm, n ~.•re w.. r.,. r semen. c»•vaw~y.. BACKGROONDER w. mvub•. IM Mmi M U,sJ. `"""dO°9' The Southern California Water Committee, Inc. is a n~,~"n'~~Ofl tax-exempt, non-partisan, public education partnership """°"~^"fbni °,.a that is dedicated to informing Southern Californians ti~ M~.~~u.M~~^A..w about our water needs and our state's water resources. ~a<"'°'° The Water Committee is a unique coalition of diverse m+Aw,. interests that have come together for the first time ~~fani°"°' to address this important and vital public policy •s ine~r v issue. Representing business, government, agriculture, ,,4i°°°„a,,.`°'°1„g,,,,,, °,o, water agencies, and the public sector, our mission is arv segos to raise public awareness, reach consensus and find "°"`°"'"'°"° solutions uyaamc . Kn W 0.in bn ,°je ~,~ SCWC gathers and disseminates timely and factual , wd~.a., information about California's water. We're committed ~ ~"•°' to keeping all members of the community informed on •.. r.•.V O,.. matters of clean water, adequate supplies and °"°s"°°'m .... ...afro mho wnae_ rn ;afe ..a.. ",a:.. _ ^ ~dd~ seminars and workshops throughout Southern Califoznia. a'°,e~a,.,a. SCWC provides slide and film presentations, accompanied anwfssscROS by written material and other resources to schools, ``aww..+a amu.,rq.M. civic organizations, corporate executives and universities. ~~ The SCWC Speakers Bureau arranges appearances at public tl~aq~ ,m,,,,„o, forums, radio programs and television news interviews. ""•°y~°' SCWC members have testified at legislative and regulatory ~ ~. es~a..w+'a~.. hearings throughout California with the assistance of the a ~ Committee's staff and legal counsel. , ~, aA. ~.... `°°"°""i°'°°" The Southern California water Committee is working now to „mop ensure a sound future for all Californians. Zt's ~~'~ 11oi 0iO1° important to our lives, our children, and our children's ,..,~.,.Mn..+rodw,,.ob„ children. r~wwpa uu,. o-ea ~, •~ ors aaw+n•ua.wra s... q.. x..ra,yw..•p..V oa.i v..n. >m o.mmauwwew~ n.nsw. M.aauwaoa lECialnlfuE fl0~'OIN CpsMNRCE t.o.np..s. ne.o.•a ti.HM+~o..M~ ~ ^~s fLPN11VE Otll[CI011 r/ (~i% ir•f..rr n mov.an..sart aa,m., ww'.m'v. ww, aurM•t w~aAMw me wak rK.rs. San Bernardino City Sector Members Eric Ziegler Robert Mrthell cry of Buatow cry o([.om. l~da 220 E, Moaatain Yn:w Street 11126 Andenm Street Bantow,G 92311 Lama linda,G 9Y1S42883 Faye Daatrup City of Ontario 303 Eau B SvuA !?nr•dn r• 417E? Cacok Keswick Cry of Redhmds Ppt OBmc Box 820 Redlaadt G 92373 Diane ONeal cry of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baaeliae Road ._Y.~...a..,.~.....::.,~,: ,. ,.,~.. tarry Rhiahart (Sty of MoatcLir SI110eaito Street Maolrlav, G 91'/63 Bob Holcomb Cdy of Sm Bernudino 300 North D Strcet Sera Bermrdiaq G 92410 i79 IfUGHES INVESTbIENT S' OEVELOPM ENT 6 ACOOISITION Oi EONM EflCIgL PROPEPTI[5 JOHN H. POTTHH Via 1ltasenger February 22, 1990 'DTe honorable City Council City oP Rancho wcamaLgP Post Office Box 807 Ranet~o Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: Right-of~Way Acquisition (Base Line Road) Trset No. 11838 Request for (bntinuence of Hearing on Resolution of Necessity Dear Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council: By letter dated February 12, 1990 from Mr. Bohn L. Martin, Associate D~gineer in the Engineering Division of the Connnmity Develoiaent Department, we were infonred that a public hearing would be conducted on March 7, 1990 to consider the adoption of a resolution o[ necessity for condemnation of certain right-of-way for Bsae Line Road near our Tract No. 11838. Tile property to be acquired is owned by Ms. Eda El lens, and we have agreed to eaeiat the City pUl`ehase 69 a eandltlat OS OUP aUUii viaiml Pt+p. J: :. We hereby request that the public hearing be continued for not less than 30 days. Tne continuance is requested eo that (1) further negotiations with Ms. El lens can be pursued so as to hopefully avoid a condemiat ion action, and C2) we can relate to the appropriate City officials some concema relating to the appraisal methodology for valuing the right-of-way strip. Finally, we hereby waive any etaiutory and/or contractual ti~m Iimi is pertaining to the cantmencement of condemnation proceedings, including but not limited to Section 68462.5 of the Califomia Government Code, during the pendency of the continuance. 'thank you far your cons ideretion o[ this matter. Very iruiy youre, }I1®frS/ LHN/V[CBYtIA~A59J0CIAIFS ~." hn B. Potter ec: Russell Maguire, City Engineer Ralph D. Hanson, City Attorney TWO CORPORgTf PLAIA~aU1TE 250~NEW POFT BEgCM. Cq 92880-'1HE9 P. O. '"•OR• y. CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March :, 133v TO: Mayor, Members of the city council, and City Manager FAOM: Debbie Adams, City Clerk ~, ~,i C/ BDBJBCT: 3TS11 el DAG7 HDi68 yC,~L~/'~_ Please remove this Stem fran tha agenda ae Rick Gomez and Ausa Maguire have met wish Daly Homes and resolved the situation eo that it ie acceptable to everyone. /da W m ~• m m V Y S m ~' ~O C D N t+ b m N N r W P W O A 2 O V m p O •O A A ~O W j/~ W ~• W tl O W V • V O OI ~O V O W y ~O tll m r A V r O~ V O O \ a m O N a } y p b T T W m n 3 i i i r T A N fn O O O J d a F O (~ N fl S O A O O ft rt m N N S S •1 a O N T .» 7 ,» T a ro z m z v c s K r r o Io -. o m v a r ~ m a ~- r* ~ s N T ~ C'I ' y Ll fi y O~ 4l :O (/~ 3r C)Cl SS O VI A t+H O2 C O S ~A d (D rt d N S C O!G Z C !p J Ta F o o. •o N ~o O ~ c n c> > N N w Z 1G 3 d 7 F 9 l d N S R W m m a 3 z N ~ ro m a ~ 3 ro'~c s n d v r\ ~ ~ N a r a •+~ ~o > ro ~ vv a ~ Z N m o o a > a cf ~-+ c F o M Z a 3 ~o c ro ~ a c ~n s m _ ro~ _ a a ro nn n _ O t1 ft O O ~O (Y T ~. O •y i d N ~ N • .T l O O v o io ~ ~- ~ o ,+ o ~ a ~ • t ~ n 6 N\ Y. F N (~ c a £ a i m a s o m o c ~ m o M i ~ n ~ ~+ n •+ 0 3 ti c c n~ j ti lU d •p d d a •y 3 F 7 of a ry a C S e1 l ~ O N G N O ~• S O IG N c ~ K ff ~ 1 O n > C ~ G N m m s N N lD 2 •C N ~ T N ~ O U• b N N O• N V O m IQQ p O O m O W O A O ~ O~ O O O O O O O N W ~ N W O N N N N O O N N a A Glm .v a a a a a a a c m - a M N M + N - n M •+ ~ a .T ~ M a M ~• .+ r ' ,+ T rt rt rt r : .* n „ ~ n ~. ~. ro on U~ Y P r u• ~ v ~p N a n ~O N W O O A V A O O m OC T y• r o mn ~~ r x 3 r r 3 x 3 x 3 3 s r mC r c V V O 'O V V S V O O N N N In S r r r r r r r r r r v O O ti ~-• r r r r r r r r r r ~ v \ \ \ \ ~ - 1 o v 'o v co v~ ~n in in ~n m m r r r r r \ \ \ n 2 ° ° ° z a z A A A A v a N N r x • r v+ r o ~ m r r ~+ W cf 0 D ~n d p O m ~ J V 9 N N C~ n ~C n p O O C C V10 N O C N N 1 } ry d O' n P O ~ » c o n c a ~ » _ r ~ ° c ~ own ce a a u o c Jol. ~.+J ~ .~ ..• m o d 0 0 ~* ~ _ '{ 6 W 61p N ~O O N r O K 0 0 O d 0 0 n d (1 ~ Ip N T O .~ d O N N d t f1 6N ^i 3 _ N ~lD O O n N r r 6 J N~ y~ ~ b b N N d d 6 n n 0. J ff N O N '1 3 ~ N N S~• N d b ~ a d y~ O M } } ~c J ~ n Jc F J N N n (C C N n C 6 y~ N O d ~ d a lC 4 n O J J 3 H ~ n m m ~ p1 C N N n ° m m m J o o n ~+ r 3 µ N ° ° ' N i a r z ~ a o W r v o m ~ J } c He w o O v 3 N _ = N N (D l~ (0 6 n N n N u ~ J J • n-. w J J (T d ' J !D J u a a N'p ~ ~o ,. ,+ a ~ e m m -~ n . ~. 6 (~ S J S W 2 (! d an d W z w m< a< O r i CC rV l ( ~ e ~ elf a -•~o ' n O ~ ~ O J a m a a r -~ n J a ~ A A 6 N m 3 O ry } N F (~ (r N N '1 } W O~ V Y N W W N A A W ~O V V ~O N VI ~•+ O N V1 O N ~O b W N _ ~ (1 `f ~+ 01 d N 71 S S S 1Y .'] C - o m O W J n m n >- } x a } d W O C N L S N C ;~ J N d l ~. O J N n C --~ n n- ~ e o d n a d n O b O ~~ W W iY O O O W C -~ O J N J .9 J n n E~ n ~o m~ 6 ~ O 1G O b C d 9 N ~ ~ } S } VI d m •e .. i } .+ m a o rv a m c rv a ~ N n J N N s } rt b C N N d ~G c s .c m ~ 3 o m c N m A O~ r N W V1 N W ~G O O N O O O N N N O O O O O N N O _ O N N N O a n a a a N N N ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~ n ~ -n y, f1 e1 rf A W r N 01 A tl1 N W O A ~ O O N O O O 3 S S 3 S 2 r x N 9 S 'O O O '9 ~ r r v~ r r r r r V V b O O N N r W r r r r ~ ti ~ ~ ° v Q ° z ~ s z A rd A Nijac No. 0760-O1 9P0-3145 ' !ION'S COI1MUNi 1Y CENTER ' '161 3ASEL[NE RU. Rr:,r_t. No: ~ RRNCIIO CUCRMONC+A, CA. _..__i line No: ___....________..___ Rbort Code: Rey No: 0 Zip: 91701 Corby Code; Equipment: PRO-41D ins call Date: 10j 01/Aa l nstal lel s: Last Service: 02/24/90 Oa L- n£L..:nn ,..7. n..,-.. ~.._ .. .. ___ _ ~ _C Man _lirviro 02/16/?0 OIDLER CN(:f.K REPLACE 9WIIC Hf,S ON P/R 0~"1Vf<3 .JOHN 0.75 09/29/89 ALRRN-CUSTOMEF. CIIAiR 1N FRONT OF REFLEC IOR 0.00 DS(221A? OTHER iWO 3ROKEN WIRES/CLOSET FULL OARH DEAN 2. U0 05(13/A9 CUSTOMER ERROR GU91 nNER MOR FIEO/ 0.01' 05(10/99 Oi NER IRAN.^,FORN!'R Olli Of WALI. PL(IG 0.00 01(23(89 CUSTOMER ERROR CUS TONER NO7I FIEO 0.00 01/13/39 8A0 3WI tCiI ?1'I'I IiUO ?^ "W 11~'Il UEAIl 0. ~0 03/30/89 OTHER OPEN [KIOP. I'OVNp 0. UR 03/27/89 UIRLER CHfnN [NnE.lt LIND MAn ACCOIINi 11UNRPR i; E1iE 0.90 12/14/OR RLRRM-CU^iONER Z3-Cr ~p'g 0. OP 11/30/89 OERM3 !IN9LIr.l(EO 09401 ,ENE n,'•0 11/2E/OE RLRRN-CU37ONER L3-(.qn'g 0,00 ll/26/OA RLARN-CUA TONER Z3-Ix~R'9 0.00 DA/16/PP RLARN-C.U$IOMFR td-,7 A1l17nP n nn OR /0Pj 9e RLARN ~C;1(I~'~I,fR ~•9'~ n, nn , 07(Ob/C9 RLRRN~C!I^•I~RII: f: 1`; (vl'"' 0 11(' 05/09/89 BEAMS Rri LCD; I~'IIE,^. tU Nf n, Pi All ROALIOIIEO ':HIIIV n "• 03/27/PA ALARM ~U9rnNrn °.01' 03/16(11.4 6A0 9WI I'[N PROKEH 39 iltl OR.RERI RLE.PII OV100 St11 it'r 0.'10 1D/75/97 RLMttI-CI1'<I~rtiF.R ~-NCO2tlALO NO COUE 0.Rn 09/23/37 V711[R POORfN WIRE Ri 71C !-~~ 'i~`d% OP,'<a/A7 RLRRII CU"I~+I~IR i'L 1'AUII!~'~ ~'RE I+ n, pn OS(05/P7 CIIS ii)Nf, IP I RI'I'I? 1f+11911 ~'nll IU of Alt I'I AN li 03/?7%97 PCAN4 Ai Iriq ICE AN 0." • j.. 0',/2A 47 BEMiS M fr:P I•I b'~ f`I "NI IIY 0.%~ 02/21707 OLARN^C!!91 O11F. td OlU ENP.~ Ilf W C(IDf 0.00 PNOrecr~oN sEmrlcEs 93eo Savenm si.. sous R naseo-srn Rancho Cucamonga, Cq 91730 Fev: Ta980-1933 COMRACnJR'S LIC: LABBB LIC: M12352 Marc`. ', . ,92 CITY COUNCIL City of Rancho Cucamonga 9161 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CR 91730 It has come to our attention that ordinance number 4091 Service Charges for False ql arms, is lacking the following considerations that would benefit the customer, the City of Ranche Cucamonga and the installing alarn tlealer: 1. Definition B. 26. 010 - does not allow for false alarms occurring by natural disaster, acts of God, or other conditions the alarm, nor the customer, are responsible for. 2. Definition 8.26.020 - is unfair in the fact that ^ost cities allow 3 or 4 false alarms with no repercussions per physical year. 3. Definition 8.26.040 - there is a lack of provision, in which the city is to make sure that the installing alarm company is licensed to do business in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, therefore creating more revenue for the City. 4. In the provision for the cost of false alarms. lhnro :. _ which states the nunher of false alarms after sir ^16IN before repercussions by the City are instituted. We believe strongly that alarm ordinance needs to be enacted, however, the ordinance that is now on the agenda lacks definition and will only cause future problems, due tc the lack of the above mentioned items. We would liMe to recommend a ND vote on ordinance nunber 409. We recommend a comnitt ee be fornetl to help establish an alarm ordinance, that will make sense to the consumer, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the alar• industry. I wo ultl like to offer my help and cooperation to assist the City in writing this ordinance. ThanN you very •uch fe•'~11-1-n.,wing me the cpFOrt u, ity of voice my nni_n i_nn_. Since, , Craig L. Thomas C.E.O. - RCEKR PROTECTION SERVICES Vice President - Security Services Rasociation Chairman - Legislation Committee ~~ ~~ MIJAC ALARM COMPANY DNI510N OF MIJAC ENTERPRISES INC. P.O. BOx 37 • UPLANp, CALIFORNIA 917&50037 (714) 9B2~7612 March 7, 1990 ~` ~ ~I~ ~ ail City of Rancho Cucamony_,a ~ RF~EIVF~ 9320 Baseline Rd. STE. C ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173C \9~„V IiE: Ordinance /W09 pear Councilman Charles Bouquet The City of Rancho Cucamonga is looking Corward to passing ordinance 6409, titled "Service charges for false alarms." Although abuse of sheriff department time dcesn'c directly cost the city money out of pocket, the more false calls a deputy is required to respond to, the less time Chey have to do their own job of crime prevention, traffic control and investigation. Unfortunately, with our increasing, number of people moving into Rancho Cucamonga, by and large [he responsibilities of crime prevention will fall more and more nn tho sfireOdnra of thn n ,vato vartnr , rnfna e: nnol alarm companies. Youz proposed ordinance does nothing [o solve the perceived problem, however it does seem to raise a question about double taxation in the form of charging alarm users Coz each cal] responded to by the sheriff department. IC is my intention that rmwh o£ th;s problem cam be solved with the help of open colRnunica tion between the city, the local alarm associations and individual companies. Better licensing of fly-by-night companies, education of the homeowner on the use of the system and strong responsibilities to choose the correct installation techniques and equipment will greatly enhance what the city is trying to achieve. Rather than na s.c i_!lo the nrrli nanrg ac v;r: rt~^ 1 •-^gU~gt Cl:e ty ConltCil consider ocher options including getting the alarm industry involved. Doping you'll vote no on ordinance 11409 in the interest of seeking a long teem solution. Yours for better securr Steve Sopkin Vice President Member: Inland Fhlpire Alarm Association, National Burglar. b Fire Alarm Assoc. National Fire Protection Agency I ~~~ CITY OF RANC}10 CUCAMONCA r„•i o,m,. r.~,. m- Barm,~ t.„ami,~.ra coin„~„„ ~r,o, ,; u, eeo.l ri ~~ a a.,..-_va Rancho Cucamonga City Council Rancho Cucamonga community rouncauon March 14. 1990 - 7:00 y.m. Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center (Oranaaba Row) 9791 Arrow Highwny Rancho Cucemongar California A. CALL TO ORDBR - CITY COUNCIL 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call - C_}_ty Council: au9uet _, grexanaer _, stout _, crown _, nr rg nc 8. CITY COUNCIL BVBIN[SB 1. Diecueeior, of County AB 939 Taek Porce. Roll Call - Conmunity POUndat loot Barton , Beyeredorf , Dutton , NcNay _, Mannerino Purkiaa _, Rosa D• JOINT IT018 Ol• DIBCUBBIw •. aCUeeimr JI po uycaa~ r priaj 66ia j,i ariridd DY v ity ~~ irv as wuaG~ Gala be aeelated by thn Aencho Cucamonga Community Puundntion.~Y Z. Oiacuaaion of StamN of mutual concern. o,,.„d,.,a~~, M+v~~ William J. AleeanJer ~ C'harler I Puquet II niv N.++xr~ Dennis I„ gtnul Ikborah N. Brown Pamela I. Wright Jaak Lam, AICV City Council/Rancho Cucamonga Comounity Foundation Meeting March 14, 1990 Page 2 E. COMMUNIGTIONE FROM THE POBLIC This is the tivu and place for tae general public to addrua the Cilp Council snd tba Rancho Cueaawage Caaunitp Fomdatioa. State law proaibits the Citp Council and Coomitp -onaAAtioa fsw addressing any iuue not previously included on the Agenda. The Citp Council and the Casunitp Foundation up _____ _ _.__isnn} _=..i cat tba u - for . .ubaequaac aseting. Ovmen6• are so be limited to five minutes per individual. P. AWOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adana, city Clerk of the Citp of Rsneao Cuca~mnga, hereby certify that a true, accurate cope of the foregoing agenda was poatad oa March 9, 1990, seventy-two (pZ) hours prior to the nesting per Oovermnt Cods 54953 at 93Y0- C Baae Line Rced. i DATE: March 14, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: AB 939 TASK FORCE The City Council at its February 21, 1990 meeting adopted a Resolution in support of the County's decision on the membership of the Task Force for AB 939. Subsequent to the Council approving its Resolution, the Board of Supervisors revised their proposed membership on the AB 939 Task Force at its March 5, 1990 Board of Supervisor's meeting. A copy of the Board of Supervisor's revised membership of the Task Force is attached for your review. Thx Soa rd of Supervisor's revised membership for the Task Force now calls for the public and professional representatives to 6e appointed by the elet ted officials. The public and professional representatives will be a61e to vote as membe rc of tha AR Q9G 7, eL F,..~n ei .._. .~... .. ...., ___~___~,_ , for the Division or House Rules or fora designated alternate fromcc itiesM~V~~Cc This information is provided for the Council review and consideration as requested at its March 7, 1990 City Council meetf ng. ited Administrative Analyst nn~ "90 Attachments: City Council's adopted Resolution Board of Supervisor's Revised Membership for the AB 939 Task Force CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S ADOPTED RESOLUTION RESOLUTION N0. 90-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIiY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMBERSHIP OF A SOLID HASTE TASK FORCE REQUIRED UNDER A.O. 939 AND DESIGNATING 0 ocooc<curgr, uc nyn q~..e...~_ ___., _._ ~_ .. ...._......,. ••.v~i me cur VI' H{WCFiP C UCAMONGA WHEREAS, Section 409540 of A.B. 939 provides that on or before March ' ;9"">0, eat i, county sna a convene a task force to assist in coordinating the development of city source reduction and recycling elements; and WHEREAS, the membership of the task force shall he determined by the Board of Supervisors and a majority of *_he cities within the county which contain a majority of the population in the county; and WHEREAS, membership may include representatives of the Solid waste industry, environmental organiz attons, general public, special districts, and affected governmental agencies; and WHEREAS, each city within Lhe County is an affected governmental agency under A.B. 939. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucanonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the membership o the Task Force required under Section 409540 of A.B. 939 nnlu in rnnefo• ni n ti<m,a,ty. uhn to _,, nln_,.A .at't_t~, s_... _._~ incorporated city within the County and one representative from each county supervisortal district, and provides that each representative may be represented in turn by an alternate who need not be an elected official; and SECTION 2: ReDresentatfves of the solid waste industry, environmental organizations, general public and special districts shall not have voting status as a meatier of the Task Force, buy may, as determined by the task Force, be included as participants of the technical subcommittees of the Task Force. SECTION 3: The elected representative for the City of Rancho Cucamonga sha be Deborah N. Brown. The Alternate representative shall be William J. Alexander. SECTION 4: Ail aleEYed pffiten pf Cho Task Fnrre; inr iijding Chairman aan mice Chairmen, shall be determined by the members of the Task Force. PASSED, APPROVED, aM ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 1990. Resolution No. 90-068 Fage 2 AYES: NOES: AfuENT; AT f EST Alexander, Brcwn, Buquet, Stout, Wright None None ;.f~~ n?nnis ~ , Stnu t, .error ~ci-1~~ ebra J~ida City I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said Ctty Council held on the 7th day of February, 1990. Executed this 8th day of February, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. QC.IL4a~w~~YL.Q J zebra , City C erk AItAt.Hnce~ , BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RLVI9ED REVISED MEMBERSHIP OF gXHIBIT AA AB 939 (The terms as ndopted in the Februery 12, 1990, action o! the Boatd ar• revised sa noted) 6WAC/811TF PROPOSAL RECDt4fENDED FOP REVIEW AND APPROVAL Proposed msmbarship o! the cot~bined Solid Wute Advi wry Council and the AB 939 Solid Waete Teak Lorca shall be as follows: rvernme.^.tal RaHrasaataticet: Elected city officials, to be eppointsd by each city and/or designetad by the City selection Committee. Appoint all members of the County Board of 8upervisor^ to the 6WAC/SW:l, one I1) 4f which shall serve a Chairman. Public and Proteaaionai iteoraesntativss t10)~ in addition to the above governmental members, the following public and profauional manbarahiptz le-~-bee4eed-~b5~-ei+e 1 - Recycling industry or expert 1 - Neter/Mubwalsr distriot 1 - Recognised environmental organisation 1 - Neste industry organisation 1 - Industry-AL-Laree 3 - Public-At-Large Z - Coammnity services dirtriot• i - Agriculture AAminietrative and Btaf! 8uooortt The Solid Maete Nanagament Department shall provide technical advise and administrative support. The Department of Environmental Nealth DervicN a• Local Enfozceeeni Agoncy shall provide technical advise. Bubcommittun BTARDIRC SUBCOlPIITTEES BRALL B=t -- Meycllnq and soured ReAuctlon 8ubcomeitteet -- heiitey citing Oubcommi!leet and -- Regulatory Camplisnee BuDoommiLtN Ravlasd Exhibit A11' Page 2 M 80C SQSCWWIY'1'E~8 81GLL INCLUDL~ -- FSacal Aavlaw SubOOmmitta• .ha aubcommlttaa shall ba ouepriaad of members o! the 8N11C/- SWTF and/or other rapraasatatiwa, a otticlai1y daaigaatad by the SxaCJBNTF. hppointad members may designate a •ta!! member of the rmpraaented organization to serve is their plate or. a subcommittee. Au lea and Policleu Existing BNAC sy Lava and policies will continua to serve as quidallnes !ot tea ntw s1iAC/BxTF with the lollowinq additional a. City appointed masd>asahlp viii bm by individual appolatanat lroa saoh oily, or by appointneata o! the City plsdtioa cosmlttN, and will aot regeire apprevel by the Ward o! 8uperviaors.