HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/03/01 - Agenda PacketOATSx Marsh 1. 1989
TO: City Council
PAOae Beverly A. Authslet
City Clerk
SDBJBCT: TIME AmD COWS IMVOL9SD n
RSSBAACa FOII ASCALL COiWITTBS
RBVI SSD
Aft@r th@ 4YSglnnl aiaf£ r9pDrt WIIe OOmpl3ad. St WIIO d1eCOVer~ thtt CLF~r ~4 ~£
menibere had spent time researching items for the Aecell Cammlttae. The adjusted
figures tollowx
Resource 8ervicee Director
Revenue Aesmi Analyst
Revenue Aeamt Alde
Account Technician
Accountant
yinence Manager
Deputy Ciiy Clerk
Clty Clerk
Redevelopmen! Coord.
Maintenance Supervisor
COI®Unlty 8eLV1Cee Menage!
Community Svc Adm Aeet
Comwnity services ALde
Pringe end
30 min x 26.60/hr. - $ 13.30
1 hour x 17.15/hr. - 17.15
1 hour x 10.36/hr. - 10.36
40 hours x 32.72jhr. - 508.80
40 hours x 34.77/hr. - 590.80
6 hours x 27.14/hr. - 162.84
15 Aours x 13.43/hr. 201.45
35 hours x 21.36/hr. - 747.60
45 min x 27.00/hr. - 20.25
15 min x 25.00/hr. - 6.25
30 min x 28.00/hr. - 14.00
15 min x 16.34/hr. - 4.09
1 h@ur x zl.oo/nr. - 21.00
$2.317.89
Overhead (35a) 811.26
TOTA[.8 141 hours 15 min 53129.15
Investlgatlon vita the Planning Department indicated that no contact had been
made with that department.
Copiu of ell in[orution requuted were paid for by the Recall Commlttse at
the rate of 5.15 per copy. Several teem in to either listen to or make copies
of tapes of city council mNtings. In uch cue, the person provided their swn
tepee and recorders.
ba
Y-.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAtFF REPORT
DATE: March 1, 1989
7C! Mayor and City Council
FROM: Duane A. Baker, Administrative As -(
l
SUBJECT: Animal Control O to tpnc
GUG'k0
~~~ J ~'r
OIL ,pY
FBI ~ BIZ
a. GD
197;
Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to pursue negotiating a
joint use agreement with [he City of Upland for shelter facilities. In addition,
it is suggested that the Mayor send a letter on behalf of Ne City Council to the
City of Upland clearly stating our intent and our desire to enter into a mutually
beneficial arrangement. The goal of this agrcemeot would be to allow Rancho
Cucamonga to use Upland's shelter, thus avoiding lht large capital expense
involved in building our own,
Back ¢rnund
As listed in the City's 1988-89 Goals and Objectives, staff has examined animal
control service alternatives. This examination was brought about because of a
number of concems mat me t.ny x.oudmt and some resments naa regarding
out current services. These concems are as follows:
1) Response times for service have been excessive, and in some cases
requests for service have not been addressed.
2) Residents have complained about not being able to contact animal
control dispatch in a timely manner, having to wait on hold for an
excessive amount of time.
3) Residents have complained about an un-caring and unresponsive
attitude projected by animal control personnel during calls for service
and field responses.
4) The animal contml shelter in Devore is an excessive distance from the
City and inconveniemiy located for residents.
5) The City is burdened by an excessive number of dead animals in the
public right-of-way. Tod often requests for the pick-up of such
animals are not responded to in a timely manner.
6) There appears to be a shortage of animal control officers necessary to
handle the number of requests for service.
In response to these concerns staff has explored four primary alternatives for
providing animal control services. Listed below arc the options that were
explored and there associated stare-up costs and annual operating costs. These
options were explored in terms of the ability to meet the desired level of
service as indicated by the Animal Control Subcommit[ee of the City Council
(Mayor Stout and Councilmember BuqueQ and attached as Appendix A.
Qptinn 1
Maintain Current Contract - Continue with our current contract with the
County. Part of this would be to continue efforts to improve responsiveness
and service. However, it should De noted treat mere are no guarantees tha[ the
County will be able to provide the level of service desired under the Curren!
contract. During the calendar year 1988, the City received 30 complaints of a
major restart for 3,672 animal control fitld responses. It is uncertain whether
there were any more complaints regarding service that were never brought to
rh.. orr.p!inp of the (^iry alrhoueh that possibility exists. In the oast, a lar¢e
portion of the problem with the County's ability to provide adequate service
involved County personae) shortages. The City has no real coplroi over how
the County will allocate limited resources if a shortage occurs agaip.
Stan-up Cost: None Annual Cost: 575,000
Qpj'oi n 2
Expand the Contract - Combine with other peighboring communities to
form a regional animal control area with the County. This arcangement would
have provisions for permanently assigned persapnel and a focal shelter.
In our discussions with the County regarding [his option it appears that our
..de urA F. _ _rl.. _ d_:. J.. ~..
... -. ... .~. ~. iivu .~..y..u~.. .i ~..,.
Fontana and Ontario joining -the plan -These cities have ezpressedu intercst~ but
nothing definite has been decided. In the meantime, the City of Ontario has
expressed concern over increasing costs and the City of Fontana is
investigating contracting with another provider.
There are no specific figures or proposals from the County regarding this
option although the County had plenty of time to respond and knew of our
desire to discuss this matter in time for the 1989-90 budget. Becaux of this
fact, staff can not give any specifics on the cost or service level this plan
would entail.
Stan-up Cost: Not Kncwn Annual Cost: Not Known
Option 7
Caniraci wiih Someope Else - Cvr.iraci wiib mtpihcr providar of animal
control services. Staff has identified the only orgapization capable of meeting
our needs as the Pomona Valley Humane Society (PVHS). In addition it was
decided that the only way a contract could work would be to join with other
area nines. This decision was arrived at due to the high coat associated with
serving our City alone which is isolated from the rest of PVHS's operation.
Staff has worked with the Cities of Ontario apd Fontana in getting a proposal
from PVHS. The PVHS proposal (Appendix B) is very thorough and specific ip
addressing the Deeds of our community. From the proposal and discussions
with PVHS staff, it is felt that a contract with PVHS would address our nwds.
This option relies on the cooperation of the Cities of Ontario and Fontana.
Although these cities showed initial interest in the project, after reviewing
the final proposal there are doubts whether Fontana or Ontario arc willing to
commit to [his proposal. As mentioned above, Ontario is concerned with the
high cost and now seems reluctant to participate while Fontana is concemed
with the start-up time and has received proposals from another provider.
Tite mason thai the arart-up cost for this option is so low is that PVHS would
finance most of the capital ezpeaditurcs and simolY spread the debt service out
over several years. The capital outlay is buried in the annual cost to ppcrate
the program.
Stan-up Cnst.• S16,896 Anuuai Cost: 5148,378
Option 4
Do it Ourselves - In this option the Ci[y would provide all or some of the
animal control services required. Some portions of the service such as
dispatch and sheltcr could be accomplished with other agencies. With this in
mind, staff explored three scenarios in which the City provides some level of
service on its own. The first scenario (Appendix C) is the City providing the
complete service on its own including a shelter, The second scenario
(Appendix D) has the City providing animal control services while leasing
sheltcr services from another agency. The final scenario (Appendix E) has
the City providing animal control services and sharing shelter facilities with
the City of Upland.
Before discusain¢ the above scenarios etaff r•rnlnmd rh. n ee:ha:ro ,.r .h.
Sheriffs Department administering our animal control services as part of
their contract. The Sheriffs Department was not receptive to this idea.
However, they did suggest that an arrangement for joint dispatching could be
worked out with the County. However, since a local clerk would be required
there are no great savings because :he clerk could serve as the dispatcher.
Scenario f
The first scenario of the three (Appendix C) is the most costly. In order for the
City to provide all necessary animal control and shelter services, a large
capital outlay is required. This capital outlay would provide for land
acquisition and construction of a shelter facility and all necessary vehicles
and equipment. In addition to the capital cost, thin scenario requires the
largest number of personnel because of the staff associated with the shelter.
The level of control for this scenario is very high and the response time would
meet the desired levels as set forth in Appendix A. It should be noted that the
desired service levels in Appendix A were originally addressed to the County
and that a City mn service would most likely be able to exceed those levels.
Stan-up CJat: f524,500 Annual Cost: 5129,500
Scenario II
The second scenario (Appendix D), leasing shelter space, is not u responsive to
the City's needs as the other scenarios. In a leased shelter, the City would not
have as much control oven the way in which residents arr, dealt with when
they go to the shelter. More importantly, there arc no private kennels with
[he necessary services and capacity conveniently located to town. One of the
main criteria set forth for animal control service was to have a local shelter.
In addition, the City would still have to find space for a holding facility to hold
animals until the end of the day until they could be taken to the leased shelter.
This is required to avoid excessive down time due to trips to the shelter in the
middle of the day. This would mean that the animals would be left unattended
and residents would still not have a local shelter.
As with the first scenario, the response times would be greatly improved and
control over the officers would be increased. The only mttercnce m servtce
deals with the services provided at the shelter. Also, because a shelter would
not have to be built, there is a big savings in the capital outlay.
Stan-up Cost: 5124,500 Annual Cost: 5113,900
Scenario RI
In the final scenario, staff contacted the City of Upland to see if there were
resources which we could share. For example, the City could pay to have
Upland's shelter expended and share the cost of the shelter staff to provide for
our animal control service. Upland's staff has expressed some interest in this
idea but requested a letter from our City Council expressing the City's intent
before detailed discussions can take place.
The advantages to this proposal are that Upland's shelter, located south of Base
Line on Campus, is very close to the City and the City would not have to
construct a new facility. In addition to reducing the capital expenses. this
arcangement could reduce personnel costs associated with manning a shelter
because those costs could be shared. Finally, this scenario would provide for
one location for residents to go for all animal control needs.
Again, because the number of animal control officers remains constant the
level of service would be ineeased over existing services.
One thing that must be pointed out about this scenario is [hat the City of
Upland's response to our overtures has been very tentative. It is staff's feeling
that if direction is given to pursue this option then Upland would be more
willing to have serious negotiations. Thia option seems to be s situation where
both cities benefit. Upland gets an expanded shelter facility and we get the
animal control services we want without the expense of building a new
shelter. The cost date used in Appendix E was arrived at from discussions staff
has had with gpland regarding the amount needed tc upgrade Upland's
shelter. The Engineering Depanmeot in Upland indicated a figure of about
530,000 to increase shelter capacity. The 510,000 shelter service fee is ao
estimate of what our portion of building maintenance end overhead. The
remaining personnel, operating, contract service, and capital coats remain
basically the same from the researeb conducted for a completely in-house
program (Appendix C).
Stan-up Cost: 5124,500 Annual Cost: 5115,500
APPENDIX A
Desired Level of Service
1) Enforcement of all State, County and City laws and ordinances pertaining
to animal control services.
2) Issuance of citations is necessary for violation of applicable laws and
ord ir~a nc es.
3) Investigation and/or response to all requests for service pertaining to
~OT.e541^ qnA ritw animals within fho f.ity limite All nn n_n,.~..~~~-,. .,••..
(as defined below) shall be responded to as soon as possible within four
hours between the business hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., seven days
per week. A71 emergency calls (as defined below) shall be responded to
within an average of 30 minutes, 24 hours per day, seven days per week.
Emergency Response
- Calls involving vicious/aggressive animals.
- Calls involving sick/injured, abused, mistreated or neglected animals.
- Calls involving animal related traffic hazards.
- Calls involving emergency assistance requested by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and other public agencies.
Non-Emergency Response
- Request for pick-up of dead animals (exce of when causing a ha zard 1.
- Request for pick-up of animals abandoned, confined or loose.
- Report of animal related nuisance (barking, animal running loose,
female in season).
4) Comprehensive dog licensi rg program whereby new and renewal licenses are
issued by mail, at local clinics (a minimum of three different dates) and
at Che service providers business office. A computer listing program is
preferred.
5) Comprehensive canvas program whereby all residents are approached first
by mail and Second by a house-to-house canvas to identify unlicensed
animals. Citations shall be issued to those persons required to license
an animal but who neglect or refuse to do so.
61 Animal reotrel education program whereby informatics is disseminated
throughout the community, to special interest and community groups, and
in local elementary, junior high and high schools. Service providers shall
conduct in-house sessions on animal control related services and animal
care to all elementary, junior high and high schools and to all service
and community groups requesting such assistance. Providers shall offer
general information and city sponsored publications and other local
information sources and newspapers.
APPENDIX A (Continued)
7) Providers shall provide monthly and cumulative fiscal year service reports
indicating that this position and resolution of all requests for service
made by Rancho Cucamonga residents.
8) Providers shall be responsible for contacting all Rancho Cucamonga
residents req~es ti ny service. Provider may respond with an animal control
officer or with information over the phone providing a resolution to the
request as achieved.
9) Providers' animal control personnel shall be responsible for meeting with
designated City personnel a minimum of one day per week (es to blf shed by
mutual agreement of the City and provider).
10) Tra os shall be provided free of r_harge to Rancho Cucam:en ga residents
requesting assistance which involve strays or animals not owned. Residents
may 6e charged for the use of traps which assist in requests involving
owned animals. Residents may be charged a deposit for any trap which is
loaned,
11) Vaccination Drogram for all animals within the City along with general
information about such a program shall be provided. Programs shalt comply
with all local, state and federal vaccination laws and guidelines.
12) A complete animal control shelter with all holding facilities, office
space, equipment and supplies necessary to Drovide animal control services
snail be provided. Shelters shall be open for business between the hours
of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Manday through Friday and 9:00 a,m. and 3:00
p.m., Saturday, except on legal holidays,
OAa:jis
APPEf1UTA B
ANIMAL CONTROL PROPOSAL
FOR THE CI ^aIES OF
ONTARIORANCHO CUCAMONGAFONTANA
PREPARED BY:
POMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY, INC.
JANUARY 1989
PURPOSE
THIS PROPOSAL HAS BEEN PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITIES
OF ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA. THIS PROPOSAL HAS
BEEN DEVELOPED IN AN ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE
PRESENT ANIMAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IN THESE CITIES. OUR PROPOSAL
panvrnFC rnn n _ _~~ ~,,,~,yOE ArvIgiAL CLARE FACILITY AND CONTROL
PROGRAM TO BE ESTABLISHED IN THE CONTRACT CITIES.
HISTORY
THE PONONA VALLEY HUNANE SOCIETY WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1949 A5 A
NON-PROFIT ANIMAL WF.LFAR F. ORGAN7ZATThN ir. rocn mr,c enn*vmv
CONTRACTED WITH THE CITY OF POMONA TO PROVIDE A QUALITY
ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL PROGRAM. SINCE 1950 THE SOCIETY HAS
nnnrn rr~rr nnntmrnynr nrmr c~ -mc rnumoat~m ernarnE~
CLAREMONT, LA VERNE, SAN DIMAS, CHINO AND MONTCLAIR.
THE SOCIETY'S SHELTER, LOCATED AT 500 HUMANE WAY ZN THE CITY
OF POMONA, HAS GROWN FROM A SMALL 10 KENNEL SHELTER TO A VERY
LARGE MODERN FACILITY CAPABLE CF HANDLING OVER 40.000 ANIMALS
A YEAR.
THE PCMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY IS GOVERNED BY A BOARD OF
DIRECTORS CON,PRISED OF TEN MEMBERS. THE DIRECTORS ARE
VOLUNTEER CITIZENS REPRESENTING THE SIX CITIES SERVED. THE
DIRECTORS SET POLICY AND GIVE DIRECTION AS NECESSARY TO
ASSURE THE CONTINUATION OF A HIGH QUALITY ANIMAL CARE AND
CONTROL PROGRAM.
THE POMONA OPERATION IS M°":AGED 9Y WILLIAid C. HA-nFORiI,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND TECLA L. SIMONTON, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR/
OPERATIONS MANAGER.
2
METHODOLOGY
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROPOSAL HAS BEEN DEVELOPED AS A JOINT
EFFORT OF THE STAFF AND BDARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE POMONA
VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY.
THE RESEARCHERS COLLECTED STATISTICS ON THE SZX CITIES
PRESENTLY UNDER CONTRACT AS WELL AS THE THREE PROPOSED CITIES.
THE STATISTICS INCLUDE DEMOGRAPHICS: POPULATION, NUMBER OF
DWELLINGS, SQUARE MILES, ESTIMATED NUMBER OF ANIMALS, TYPES
OF ANIMALS AND GROWTH POTENTIAL. THIS DATA WAS COLLECTED BY
PERSONAL CONTACT WITH THE APPROPP.IATE CITY AGENCIES, i.E.:
PLANNING DEPARTMENTS OF EACH OF THE CITIES.
FROM THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN GATHERED, WE ARE ABLE TO
S:10W COMPARISONS BETWEEN OUR PRESENT OPERATION IN POMONA AND
OUN PROPOSED OPERPTION IN TH£ ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
FONTANA AREA.
3
SERVICES
THE POMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCSETY OFFERS MANY SERVICES WHICH
ARE DIVIDED INTO TWO MAIN AREAS: ANIMAL CONTROL AND HUMANE
ACTIVITIES. WE PROPOSE TO PROVIDE A SOUND AND EFFECTIVE
ANIMAL CONTROL - HUMANE ACTIVITY PROGRAM CCNSZSTING OF THE
FOLLOWING SERVICES:
1. ENFORCEMENT OF ALL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS PERTAINING TO
ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL.
2. RESPOND TO ALL REQUESTS FOR SERVICE REGARDING DOMESTIC
AND WILD ANIMALS DURING THE HGURS GF BA.M. TO 6P.M.,
MONDAY THROUGH SATUADAY.
3. RESPOND TO ALL EMERGENCY CALLS FROM BA.M. TO 5 P.M. ON
SUNDAY AMD HOLIDAYS.
4. RESPOND TO ALL EMERGENCY CALLS FROM 6:00 P, M. TO
8:00 A.D1.: MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY AND FROM 5:C0 P.M.
TO E:00 A. M. ON SONDAY.
5. PROVIDE ALL SERVICES PERTAINING TO LICENSING OF DOGS.
DOG LICENSE SERVICES INCLUDE:
A, MAILING OF ANNUAL RENEWAL NOTICES.
B. ISSUANCE OF LICENSES VIA MAIL AND/OR THROUGH OUR
BUSINESS OFFICE.
4
SERVICES CONTINUED
C. SCHEDULE AND STAFF A MINIMUM OF 5 LOW-COST RABIES
CLINICS EACR YEAR.
D. PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE DOOR-1C)-DCOR LICISISE CANVASSING
PROGRAM.
6. MAINTAIN A FULL SERVICE ANIMAL SHELTER IN ONE OF THE
THREE CITIES (LOCATION PENDING). THE SHELTER WILL BE
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY --- EXCEPT
ON DESIGNATED HOLIDAYS.
7. PP.OVIDE A HUMANE EDUCATION PROGRAM ACCEPTABLE TO THE
......... ....... .. ......v..~. vio7ni~.I6.
8. FURNISH EACH CONTRACT CTTY A MONTHLY REPORT OP ALL
ANIMAL CONTROL ACTIVITIES.
NOTE: THE POMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY'S PROCEDURE NANUAL
HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITH THIS PROPOSAL.
5
PERSONNEL
FIELD SERVICES
FTFrn ccq!.?~~,~, ;,ILL n$ aurrVR't'ED HY 70 POSITIONS; 7 OFFICERS
1 DISPATCHER AND 2 DOG LICENSE CANVASSERS. REGULAR FIELD
SERVICES OPERATE FROM 8:00 A.M. TD 6:00 P.M. IN THE WINTER
MONTHS AND cROM 8:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. IN THE SUMMER MONTHS.
EMERGENCY SERVICE IS PROVIDED FROM 6:00 P.M. OR 8:00 P.M. TO
d:00 A.M. EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK INCLUDING HOLIDAYS.
REGULAR FIELD SERVICE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: ENFORCEMENT OF
ALL CITY ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO THE CONTROL OF ANIMALS;
RESPONDING TO ALL CITIZEN COMPLAINTS; REMOVAL OF CARCASSES
FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND ALLEYS AND FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY UPON
REQUEST; IMPOUNDMENT OF ALL STRAY ANIMALo ANU OWNERS ANIMALS
UPON REQUEST; INVESTIGATING BITE REPORTS AND QUARANTINING
OFFENDING ANIMALS; INVESTIGATING ALL REPORTS OF CRUELTY,
NEGLECT AND ABUSE} MAINTAINING ALL RECORDS OF ENFORCEMENT
PERTAINING TO ANIMAL CARE AND CONTRCL.
eMERGENCY FIELD SERVICE INCLUDES: RESpONPSNG TO ALL REPORTS
OF SICK, INJURED OR VICIOUS ANIMALS; REQUESTS BY THE POLICE
TO ASSIST II. E. REPORT OF ANIMALS CONFINED IN TRAPS OR ANIMALS
CAUSING A TRAFFIC HAZARD). EMERGENCY SERVICE WILL EE PROVIDED
EVERY DAY AFTER REGULAR FIELD SERVICE IS COMPLETED.
6
PERSONNEL CONTINUED
KENNEL SERVICE
KENNEL SERVICE WILL BE SUPPORTED BY 5 KENNEL ATTENDANTS.
KENNEL SERVICES ARE THOSE SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH MAINTAINING
OL'R ANIMAL SHELTER. ALL ANIMALS WILL BE HELD IN OtiR I'nemnno
IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. STRAY ANIMALS WITH NO IDENTIFI-
CATION WILL BE HELD 3 WORKING DAYS BEFORE BEING ADOPTED TO A
NEW HOME OR EUTHANI2ED. ANIMALS WITH IDENTIFICATION WILL BE
HELD 10 WORKING DAYS BEFORE BEING ADOPTED OR EUTHANI2ED. ALL
AMIMAI.S WILL BE MAIN^.:Altv~^1.. IN T'F'.E CLF.;hBSf AND SAFEST ENVIRONMENT
POSSIBLE. KENNEL ATTENDANTS REGULAR DUTIES INCLUDE CLEANING,
FEEDING AND EUTHF,NASIA. ALL KENNEL ATTENDANTS WILL BE TRAINED
BY A LICENSED VETERINARIAN TO PROPERLY AND HUMANELY EUTHANI2E
DOh1ESTIC ANIMALS.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INCLUDE THOSE SERVICES THAT SUPPORT
FIELD AND KENNEL OPERATIONS. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES WILL BE
SUPPORTED BY 6 POSITIDNS; 4 CLERKS, 1ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
AND i OPERATIONS MANAGER. THIS STAFF WILL PROVIDE THE PUBLIC
WITH ALL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO SERVICES PROVIDED HY OUR
ORGAN12ATI0N, PROCESS ALL ADOPTION AND REDEMPTION REQUESTS,
SELL OOG LICENSES, PROCESS MAILINGS FOR RENEWING DOG LICENSES
AND MAINTAIN FILES AND RECORDS AS NECESSARY.
7
PERSONNEL DEPLOYMENT COMPARISON
POSITIONS PONONA PROPOSED CITIES
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 1
OPERATIONS MANAGER 7 1
A0flH Upcnro i x
HUMANE EDUCATOR 1 **
COMMUNITY RELATIONS COORDINATOR 1 **
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 1
CLERK/RECEPTIONIST 5 4
DISPATCHER 1 i
FIELD OFFICERS 7 7
MtNNGL A'1'TENDENTS 6 S
CANVASSERS 2 2
TOTAL POSITIONS 27 21
* EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POSITION AND BOOKKEEPER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED OUT TO PROPOSED CITIES AT i08 OF BASE PAY AND
BENEFITS OF CURRENT POSITIONS IN POMONA.
** HUMANE cnnrnmlON PCSZTiON iiv POMONA LVI T.1. gi`kytrE n~c~u AREA.
COMMUNITY RELATIONS POSITION WILL NOT BE CHARGED THE FIRST
YEAR.
8
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
THERE IS PRESENTLY NO AN It~LAL CARE AND CONTROL FACILITY IN
nm~ nr myr nnnnnec~ _ ,,,~ ~ ~~~~~~, riB YxVYOSE TO BUILD A
FULL SERVICE ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL FACILITY IN ONE OF THE
CONTRACT CITIES.
THIS PROPOSAL REFLECTS A NEED FOR 8 VEHICLES TO BE PURCHASED
IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE
TARGET AREAS.
MANY OF THE COSTS FOR THE FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT HAVE BEEN
BUDGETED iN THE ENCLOSED LINE ITEM HUDGET. THE FORMAT OF
BUDGETING THESE LARGE E%PENDITURES MARES IT IMPERATIVE THAT
THE HUMANE SOCIETY AND THE PROPOSED CITIES REACH A LONG TERM
AGREEMENT BEFORE AN ANIMAL CONTROL PROGRAM CAN BE FINALIZED.
9
BUDGET
THE POb10NA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY OFFERS MANY SERVICES WHICH
AFF i.T Smsn nn]n sq mWn Mn •~~ r*mcrrn-~~ ~~~Ii,-NL ~~~yynOL Aivu
HUMANE ACTIVITIES. THE REVENUE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL IS
GENERATED THROUGH SALE OF DOG LICENSES, ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES,
nneuLANCE FEES, ANIMAL TRAP RENTALS, VETERINARY FEES, COURT
FINES AND MISCELLANEOUS OTHER INCOME. THE REVENUE FOR HUMANE
ACTIVITIES IS GENERATED THROUGH ADOPTIONS OF ANIMALS,
DONATIONS, FUND RAISERS, SALE OF PET SUPPLIES AND MISCIISA!lf70U5
OTHER INCOME. THE EXPENDITURES BUDGETED FOR THIS PROPOSED
OPERATION IS BROKEN DOWN INTO TWO SEPARATE DIVISIONS AND A
PERCENTAGE OF EXPENDITURES IS ASSIGNED TO EACH.i.<.• aas Fnw
ANIMAL CONTROL ACTIVITIES AND 12$ FOR HUMANE ACTIVITIES. THE
EXPENDITURES IN THIS PROPOSAL ARE GREATER THAN THE REVENUE
GENERATED BY THE REVENUE SOURCES, THEREFORE, THE THREE
CONTRACTING CITIES WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEFICIT
FUNDING BASED ON THEIR PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION. IN THE
FUTURE, WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE FUNDING FORMAT BE
CHANGED USING PERCENTAGE OF SERVICE RECEIVED. BECAUSE WE ARE
UivABLE T'O EVALUATE THE PRESENT SERVICE BEING PROVIDED WE
RECOMMEND OPERATING UNDER THE POPVLATION FORMULA THE FIRST
YEAR OF SERVICE.
10
POMONA VALLEY HUMA":E SOCIETY d S. P. C. A
ANIMAL CARE d CONTROL PROPOSAL
FOR TI1E CITIES OF
ONTARIO RANCHO CUCA"TONGA FONTANA
JASUARY 1989
.AD~iI NISTRnTIVE SERVICE EXPENDITURES
TOTAL A!C H/A
OFFICE SUPF LIES S 9,000 $ 7,920 $ 1,090
t;A INTENANCE CONTRACTS 12,000 10,560 1,440
ADV ERT'I5ING/COMMUNITY AWARNESS 8,000 7,040 960
TRAINING 5,000 4,400 600
DOG LICEt:SE 10,000 10,000 D
INSURANCE 35,000 30,800 4,200
UTILITIES 30,000 26,400 3,600
PROFESSIONAL FEES 8,000 7,040 960
POSTAGE 19,OOC 16,720 2,280
DUES d SU85CRIPTIONS 2,000 1,760 240
PRO+lOTI0N5 4.000 7.nnn ?, ~~^
E;-0PLOYEE RELATIONS 3,000 2,640 360
PROJECTS 20,000 D 2a,ooo
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 2,640 360
5168,000 $129,920 S 38,G80
FIELD SERVICES
TOTAL A/C N A
VETERINARY FEE $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ D
SAFETY EvUiPhiENT „ Ovu 5,000 D
VEHICLES - MAINTENANCE 30,000 30x000 D
LEASE 36,000 36,000 H
COPLMUNICATIONS 5,000 5,000 D
UNIFORMS 3,500 3x080 420
504x500 $84,080 $ 420
POMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY 6 SPCA JANUARY 1989
ANIMAL CONTROL~PROPOSAL CONTINUED
PAGE 2
KENNEL SERVICES
TOTAL A[C H/A
PHYSICAL PLANT S 70,000 561,600 $ 8,400
SUYPLIi;S 7,000 6,160 840
ANIMAL FEED 12,500 11,000 1,500
DISPOSAL 9,000 1,920 1,080
MEDICAL SUPPLIES 4,000 3,520 480
$102,500 590,000 $ ?2,:00
rnormnr ... ........Gnuo
6 ANIMAL CONTROL VEHICLE BEDS $51,200
12
POMONA VALLEY HUDIANE SOCIETY d SPCA
hNIMAL CONTROL PROPOSAL
PAGE3
ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES ~
A
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OVERHEAD
BOOKKEEPER
CiV EAHEAD
CLERKS
OVERTIME
OVERHEAD
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
OVERHEAD
FIELD SALARIES
OPERATIONS !4,.NAGER
OVERHEAD
OFFICERS 6 DISPATCHER
OVERTIME
OVEP.Y. EAD
LICENSE CANVASSERS
CVERHEHD
iC-HiA 4'U'1'AL
60-40 530,000
60-40 7,200
88-12 13,000
88-12 3,100
88-12 71,100
88-12 4,000
88-12 17,100
88-12 32,000
88-12 7,700
5165,200
8 TOTAL
100AC $ 36,700
t00AC 8,800
100AC 167,200
100AC 18,100
100AC 40,200
100AC 36,000
100AC 8,700
5315,700
KEN!:°' FRIES
KENNEL ATTENDANTS
OVERTIME
OVEP,NEAD
B TOTAL
88-12 $88,800
88-12 6,000
88-12 21,300
$116,100
JANUARY 1989
A/C H/A
$ 18,000 512,000
4,320 2,880
11,440 1,560
2,728 372
62,568 8,532
3,520 480
15,048 2,052
28,160 3,840
6,776 924
5152,560 $32,640
A/C H/A
36,700 p
8,800 ~
167,20G ~
18,100 ~
40,200 Q
36,000 ~
8,700 ~
$315,700 ~
A/C N A
78,144 10,656
5,280 720
18,744 2,556
5102,158 $13,432
13
PONONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY d SPCA
ANIPfAL CONTROL PROPOSAL
PAGE q
RECAP OF EXPE?7D ITURES
JANUARY 1989
i v_i,~L A/C H/A
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE $166,000 $129,920 $38,080
AD?tINISTRATIVE SALARIES 785,200 152,560 32,640
FIELD SERVICE 84,500 84,080 q2p
FIELD SALARIES 315,700 315,700 p
KENNEL SERVICE 102,SOD 90,200 12,300
KENNEL SALARIES 116,100 102,768 73,932
CAPITAL EXPENSE 51,200 57,200 ~
TOTAL $1,023,200 $925,828 $97,372
is
PROJECTED ANIMAL COt7TROL REVENUE
SALE OF DOG LICENSES
ANIMAL Ih1P0UND FEES
AMBULANCE FEES
ANIMAL TP.AP RENTAL
VETERINARY FEES
COURT FZNES
$ 3E',E'S
32,900
6,575
2x600
550
0
TOTAL INCOME 5 425x000
15
ANIMAL CONTROL COST BREAKDOWN
SALARIES WITH OVERHEAD
GENERAL OPERATIONE
CAPITAL EXFENDITURES
5 Si0,428
ann ~nC
57,20C
TOTAL S 925,828
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL INCOME
SUBSIDY
PERCENTAGE OF SUBSIDY BASED ON POPULATION.
ONTARIO
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FONTANA
8 OF POPULATION
418
338
268
16
S 925,828
425,000
$ 500,828
ANIMAL OJNTROL ODST
$ 205,339
165,274
130,215
i ~VV,OLO
POMONA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY b SPCA
ANIMAL CONTROL
PROGRAM
*S BASED ON ANIMAL CONTROL ANIMAL CONTROL
SUBSIDY SUBSIDY
CT T'i SERVICE 1987 1987 1986 1968 1989
POMONA 51.8 $ 201,292 $ 228,373
CLAREMONT 7.5 36,299 37,713
LA VERNE 6.4 32,714 32,182
SAN DTMAS 7.8 32,266 39,222
CHINO 15.9 68,116 79,952
MONTCLAIR 10.6 37,195 53,301
TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL RESPONSIBLILTY $ 470,743
*PVHS BUDGET 1988-1989 "CONTRACTING ANIMAL CONTROL SEVICES FOR
THE CITIES OF POMONA, CLAREMONT, LA VERNE, SAN DIMAS, CHINO AND
MONTCLAIR"
17
CODIPARISION CITIES
PRESENT CITIES UNDER CONTRACT
'87-'88
CITY POPUfATION SQ. DALES OICET.LII~S DOG LTCEeVCFC n ~,_ onm~.r
POMONA 119,144 22.8 36, 14A 8,562 177,512
CLAREDIONT 35,996 11 72,000 2,892 39,27_5
LA VERVE 30,085 8.5 10,394 2,824 42,318
SAN D1MA5 31,720 15 8,431 3,125 49,454
D10NTCLAIR 25,383 5.25 8,841 2,681 41,980
CHINO 52,014 16 14,376 5,594 83,570
TOTALS 294,342 78.55 90,188 25,628 434,059
PROPOSED CITIES
CITY POPIIIATI0:4 SQ. MILES DWELLINGS DOG LICENSES A.C. REVIT4UE
ONThRI0 118r794 36 37,555 NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILALBE
Rk4.~10 CUCAtdONGA 105,020 35 33,710 "
FONTANA 75,327 35 25,132 " "
TOTAL 299,141 106 96,397 NOT AVAILABLE NOI`AVAILABLE
18
APPENDIX C
City of Rarx:ho Cucamonga
Animal Control Costs
Personnel Cost
Kennel Attendant (2) 35,600
Animal Control Offber (4) 88,000
Dispatch Clerk (1) 16,800
Benefits 49, i 00
$189.500
Genera! Operstlone
Office Supplies, Printing 8 Postage 4,800
Promotion 8 Advertising 500
Community Awareness and Educatbn 500
Insurance 1 8,000
Ui,iiainrs - rY1Ci18aB 8rld M81n18nafICB 2,500
Field Supplies 8 Equipment 2,000
Vehicles -gas, maintenance, 8 replacement 26,400
In-service Training 500
Llcensirtg Supplies 3,100
Dues 8 Subscriptions 200
Sse,soo
Contract Servlese
CarnassingServices +c nnn
Veterinary Services 2,000
Other Services 5.000
122,000
Capital Expenditures
Site Aqulsition 200.000
Shelter construction 230,000
Vehicles (3) 84,000
Computer Equipment 5,000
Communicatbna Equipmem 3,500
Office Furniture 2.000
1524,500
Grand Tatel 5794,500
less Iicettsirq revenue 5140,500
less first year slert costs 1524.500
Annual Opentinp Coeta After InitiN Ywr 1729,500
APPENDIX D
Ciy of Rancho Cuprtwnga
Animal Control Costs W/O Shelter
Personnel Coat
Animal Control Officer (4) 88,000
Dispatch Clerk (1) 16,800
Benelits 37.000
$141,800
General Operatlone
ng,.a c,,.. nay o~c;.~., a "o;; "-
Tf..-~, ,y u ,O}fV .. 4.800
Promotion 8 Advertising 500
Community Awareness and Educatbn 500
Insurance 18,000
Uniforms -Purchase and Maintenance 2,500
F~~~ti S,••;M,:oa 8 Equiprtlem 2,000
Vehk~es - gas, maintenance, 8 replacement 33,500
In-servbe Trainirp 500
llcensirg Supplies 3,100
Dues 8 Subscriptions 200
565,600
Contract 5ervleee
Shelter Services 25,000
Camessinq Servk;es t 5 nnn
Veterinary Services 2,000
Otner Services 5.000
$47,000
Capital Expsndlturee
Holding Faclliry 30,000
Vehicles (3) 84,000
Computer FAuipment 5,000
Communica8ons Equipment 3,500
Oflbe Furniture 2.000
$124,500
Grsnd Totes $378,900
less licensing revenue $140,500
lase first year start costs $124,500
Annual Operating Coate After Initial Year $113,000
APPENDIX E
Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga
Animal Control Costs
Utilizing Upland's Shelter
Personnel Cost
Kennel AOendenl (1) 17,800
Animal Control Officer (4) 88,000
Dispatch Clerk (1) 16,800
Benefits d2.800
5165,500
vener~i vperaiiona
Office Supplies, Printing B Postage 4,800
Promotion 8 Advertising 500
Community Awareness end Educaibn 500
Insurance 18,000
Uniforms -Purchase and Maintenance 2,500
Field SuppOes 8 Equipment 2,000
Vehkes • gas, maintenance, 8 replacement 26,400
In-service Training 500
licensing Suppllee 3,100
Dues 8 Subsaiptbns 200
558,500
Contract Services
sneuer services to,ooo
Camassin0 Services 75,000
Veterinary Services 2,000
Other Services 5.000
532,000
Capilel E><penditwaa
Upland Sheher Expansion 30,000
Vehicles (3) 84,000
Canputer Equipmem 5,000
Communicatbns Equipment 3,500
Office Furniture 2.000
$12$,500
Grand Total 5380,500
lase Ik;ensirtg revenue 5140,500
less Brat year start costs fi24y00
Annutl Opantln0 Costa ANar Initial Yar 5773,500