Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/06/06 - Agenda Packet_.~ ,, - , 3 ~,; w CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY 4F A4*!CII4 CUC ;;unw~G REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 70D pm June 6, 1990 Civic Center Council Chambers tOSM ('ivir (enter Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 •~• City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, xrayo. Pamela J. Wright, cnuircnmrmbe. Dehorah N. Brown, nroyo. norm Charles 1. Buquet, cou~<nm<n,e<r William J. Alexander, counts;m<mDr< +~• Jack Lam, Cq~.Knnnx<, ]amen L. Markman, ay Aimrn<v Debra J. Adams, cnr c;<,.t City t)fTce; 989-1631 Liom Park: 980-3113 PACE City Council Agenda June b, 1990 All Stec aubaittad for the Cilp Coaacil Agaada aunt De in writing. The dgdiiaa for aubad.tting than itga it 5:00 p.a. on the Nadngday prior to the aaating. The Citp CLr4's Oftica raeslvq all me6 itau. f i I ~ A. CALL TO ORDEQ I i ~ 1. Roll Call: Baguet _, Alexander _, Stout _, I Grown _, and Nright III I i I I a. AN~wuec~rrs/pRaamrsAxloee ~,, I C. COIelO112CATIOIfa eeaw Tq PgaL1C Thin la the tine and place !or the ggeral pnDlie to addraq the C1t7 Cooacil. 6tab tar pmhlhitn the City Cnnncil [rq addieaainy q! leave a0! pt..ionaly Sacludud q W Agenda. The Ciep Oomcil rp receive tgtiaonp and net the natter for a nubaegngt wtiag. Cagenta aav to W limited to [ive I sinntq per individual. I p. CalaQr CALLLNDAa The folloriag Coaaant Glaudar iteu are expectW Lo M routine and noA-controversial. They will b aetW upon b! the Comcil at one tine without dLCUSSion. Any itq up be i rgovsd by a Comcilaaahar as awsDer o[ !ha andigee for discussion. I 1. Approvsl of Minutq: May 2, 1990 May 8, 1990 I I 7. Approval of Narrante, Ragietsr Hon. 5/16/90 sM 5/13/901 1 and Payroll ending 5/9/90 for the total amount of $7x073,/71.48. 3. Apprwsl of 3989/90 Budgetary Ad~uetmsnta. 11 i i i a. Approval to srecub • new sgrasaan! (C4 90-081) [or 55 sharing LM come of the mainNnanoe of traffic signaU st city boundaries between the Clty of Ontario snd the city o[ Rancho Cuoasonga. City Connell Agenda e~~~ ~3~ Junes 6, 1990 PACE 2 ~ 5. Approval to execute annual contract (CO 90-O8Y) with the 59 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department for an Automated DLngerprint ID system (CAZ.-ID) in the aawunt of $46,080.00. 6. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 90-OB3) with the sm 60 9cr.^.ardino County 83oW Cantroi Di¢tzict for Day Creek Phase 3A improvements from Airport Drive in the City of Ontario to I-15, just south of Arrow Routs in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in an amount not to exceed $10.5 million to W funded by San Bernardino County Plood ~ Control District with Bureau Of Reclamation Loan Funds. Hy an egremn[ approved previously with the Ylood I Control DS etr ict. the said Federal ]mn . n~~ ..±]i ti I repaid by the City•• Rehwlopment Agency from Pund YY. 7. Approval to execute Mimburaement Agteement (CO 90-0H4) 61 !or Undergroundinq of Overhad Utilitiaa for parcel Map No. 9436, located east o! Nawn Avenue, between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue, submitted by Diverritied Properties Company III - UR 004. A880LUTION IAD. 90-Y31 63 A RE80LUTION OF TBE CITY COUNCIL O1 TBB CITY i OF RANG COCANONOA, CALIfOANIAr APPROVING __-.~.~__._._ _-_Y......_ _..__..___ ... _.. . .u ~ay.u,u..n.N• ,M,tis,Y..• eYFV,aV Ua VVaa a, 1990 POR UNDERGROOIIDSNG OF A PORT20N OP OVEWRAO UTILITIES LOCATED RABTERLY OF NAVNN AVENUE, BETNEBN NIOlN.AND AVENUE AND LElN)N AVBNUi 8. Approval to execute Program Supplement No. 14 (CO 90- 64 OBE) to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08-54]0 between tM City of Rancho Ncamonga and tM 8tate of Cslitornia for the modification of exieeinq Aailrwd Crouinq protection devices at the Aocherter Avenue at Atchlwn, Topeka and Banta h Railroad Crossing No. 7- 95.0. The auppleernt seta the Federal portion of CM project at 5119,700.00 and the City'^ portion at $13,300.00 with provision to incnaN the Clty portion ~ should Che need arise. rirdinq for the Supplement ~ Agreement shall W from eyKems Deoelopa~ant Fu(nle. City Council Agenda ,TVna 6, 1990 PAGE AESOLUTION NO. 90-232 66 I A ARSOLOTION OP TID1 CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP AANCNO CUCIINONOA, CALIPOANIA, AUTHORSESNG S~ P p S N pR ~ ~ U PLBNSAT NO 14 TO LOCAL AGENCY STATB ~ ~' AGREEMENT NO. OB-5420 POA CROSSING I PROTECTION MODIFICATIONS AT THE ROCf7ESTER AVENUE AT THE ATCHISON, TOPERA ANO SANTA PE I I AAILROAO CROSSING NO. 2-95.0 ~'' ~ 9. Approval to execute annuel contract (CO 90-086) with San 68 I ~ i~ eernnrdino County fot Mlmal Control Saroicea to account i for Dereonnal ~d ....:.. _.~.. ___._____ _..:-.-.,. ;,. $62,700.00 to bo funded from General Overhead Account No. 03-4285-6028. j 10. Approval to accept Improvamenta, RaUSq of BonQa and ~~ Notice of Completion Por Trect 13722 located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lana and Milliken Avenue. Relesaa: Faithful Pazfozmanca Bond (Street) $1,367,000.00 j Accept: I .,..~.,........ n _ .-. .... _..- ~ `, • -__••-_•`- RESOLUTION N0. 90-233 ~) A RESOLUTION OF TFR CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIPOANSA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEXEMfB POR TAACT 33722 AND AUTHORIEINO TNC PILING OP A NOTSCB O/ COMPLBTION POA TIR HOAR i• COIIEOT OEDI111111CEa The following OMieancaa have pad pahlic haariaga at the Eiaa I of fist reading. Eacvai readiaga an expected to M routiaa and aoe-eaatraveraiai. T'hay will ba acted upev by the Couvpil at one tiM without diacnuioa. The Clty Clerk will seed the Citla. My ltae can M raevved for dLcuaaiou. 1. CONSIDEMTION 01 8 E9' ADDRE89IN0 POBTSNfl ~Z g~gyjgji>)uQQ - an Ordinance amending the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda by ravLinq atraat sddraaa eaalgnmant and poatinq raquiramanta. city Ccuncil Agenda Juno 6r 1990 PAGF, I~ I ~ i ORDINANCE NO. 618 (second iaading) 72 __ ~ AN ORDINANCE OP TNB CITY COUNCIL 6P TBS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIAr ANENDING i TBE RANCHO CUCANONCA tiONICYPAL CODE BY I I DELETING PORTIONS OP SAN BEANARDINO COUNTY I CI PROVISIONS ADOPTED BY ORDINNiCS NO. 17r I ~ I ENTITLED "POSTING OF STAABT NUNBBAe" AND BY I ' I ADDING CHAPTER 8.26 ENTITLED "STREET ADDRESS POSTING"r TO T2TLS B OF SAID RANCHO II CUCAMONGA HONICI PIU. CODB I ...._ ___.. ____.___ __ 76 CITY OP A>nCKO CUCAMONGA AIDSNDINO SECTION 12.08.050 OP TAE A>wCNO COCAMONGA MDNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO gxPwPTZON3 FROM REOOIAEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT POBLIC INPROV6NENTS ORDINANCE NO. 420 (aoaond raadinq) 75 AN ORDINANCE OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF T~ CSTY OP AANCRO COCANONGAr CALITOANIAr ANENDSNC EECr2oN 12.Da. aso Dr rA: RANCHO rncAUONGA ~ NONICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO E7CElQ•TIONB IRON RYpDIREMENTB TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC IMPROVEIRNTB 3. CON9IDBRATION TO CHANGE TAE REGULAR MEETING PLACE 77 ~ ORDINANCE NO. 4T3 (second raadinq) 77 I ~ AN OAOINANC6 OF TFB CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RAHCRO CUCAMONGAr CALIIORNIAr AMENDING 96CTION 2.32.010 OI CRAFTER 2.12 OP TITLE I 1Y Ol TBE RANCHO COCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE LOCATION OP CITY COONCIL MEETINGS I. ADVElTIN PIINY.IC ENANINGN TDa Yallawisq iiru tu.. bwa adxartisad sad{or poNSW u I public DuringN NN ragnind D~ law. TDa eMir will span LDa satiny to mNlpa puDlia tulLOnl. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND CHAPTER 8.24 OF TBE AANCRO IS COCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BF ADDING Nd 6ECTIONS 8.26.060. 8.24.050. 8.24.060 AND 8.24.070. pEATAINIMb TO 6RAIiTTI REIN1VAt. AND THE SALE OF AEROSOL PA2NT Ciiy Cou.lcil Agenda Juna 6, 1990 PAGE ORDINANCE NO. 419 (aecand r~adinq) J9 AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF TNS CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ANSNDINC CHAPTER 8.24 OP TNS IUINCHO COCANONGA I ! MUNICIPAL CODS BY ADDING NSN SSCTIONS ~ ~ ~ ~ 8.24.030, 8.23.050, 5.24.060 AND 8.24.070, PERTAINING TC GIUPFITI ABNOVAL AND THH SALE OP ABROSOL PAINT ~ ABSOLUTION NO. 90-236 i 81 A RBSOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TIDE CITY ~ i ~ OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIPOAHTA, A0T7IORZSING ABNARDS AB OHPINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 419, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO INFOPMATION LEADING TO TIR CONVICTION Ot ANY PERSON PLACING GAAlFITI OM AMY POBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY 2, 82 RS80LtlTION FOR THE AENOAL LEVY OF A88E98MENT8 NITRYM 7 AND 8 FOA lIECAi. TEAR 1990/91 I i aaaULU'a'aV11 lW. Yu-[aa oc A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OF THi CITY O- RANCHO CUCAMOMGAr CALIMIANIA, TO LEVY AND COLIdCf A93ESSMBNTS NITNIM LANDSCAPE '! MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS MOB. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, !~ ( 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 PURBtlANT I TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIORTIMG ACT OF 1972 IN LOIINECTIOM NITN LANDSCAPE MAIIITENIINCE ! D29TAICTB NOS. 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 6, 7 AND 8 ' 3. COMSIDEAATION TO APPROVE ANIRIAL ENOINEER'8 REPORT AND REBSILUI'IOM 1OR TBe ANNUAL LEIK OF ASSE88MRIT'E NITHIN STREET LYGNTINO MAIETLN!S9LR DI9TRICTB MOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 181 !i ~ 5. AND 6 FOA FISCAL TEAR 1990/91 I Cliy Council Agantla dune 6, 1990 PAGE AHSOLOTION NO. 90-236 1$Q A RESOLUTION OP TIB CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OP RANCHO COCAlfDNGA, C1ILIPORNIA, TO LBVY AND COLLECT ASSE881PJ7T3 NITHIN 9TAEET LIGHTING NAINTEMANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 POA FISCAL YE11R 1990/91 PURSUANT 1'O TfB ~ I LAND6CAPE AND LIGHTING ACT O! 1972 IN CONNECTION NITH BTREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 4. CONSIDBAATION Or AMEND7IN: YAD, mo~,.T .... 14t-~, ......., ~ ON THE SOOTNNEST WRNER OP HIGHLAND AND MILLIAEN 31`1 RESOLUTION NO. 90-237 320 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OP RANG CUC1111011DA, CALIrOANIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP, TRACT NO. 14121 s• 322 DEVLLOPIRMT REVIEM 89-12 - DAMES - M appeal o! tM ~ ~ Planning Cosiulon'^ daciaion denying tM dawlopaiant of ar. industrial complai containillq six Lnduatzlal Duildinga totaling 22,940 aquas tact on 2.2 aoree of land in tM GeMral InduatrLl DLtz1M, SuMrp 3 of tea industrial Specific Plan, located on laron ~ I Boulevard, eaet of Helene Awnw - APq 209-031-87 end 8H. ~, RESOLUTION NO. 90-238 365 A RESOLOTION 0/ THE CITY COUNCIL Or T~ CITY O! RIIMCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORIIIA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT' AEVIEN MO. B9-32, THE DavsLOP1uNT or AM IimosTAlAi CO!@LEY CONTAINING EIi INDU6T'RIAL EDILOINGE TMALING 22,910 EpDARE rEET ON 2.2 ACREB Ol LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, EUEAREA 3 IPD O ~ I ~ PEROII BOUI,EVARD, EAB Or HELMB AVEMUE APN ~ 209-33i-87 AND 66 ~ PAGE ,t City Council Agenda Y p ~+' yP Juna 6, 1990 7 ue or hr3r I O. PIIBi.IC BE71R2)Itl8 The follwing itus bare ao legal publication os porting I I requirewata. Tba Cheir rill open the weting to re<eire public Grtlaon}. i it I I No Items Submitted. " ' i ~ 8. CITY NANAONR•8 BTAR REPOATN ~I The following itew ao oni irya/!p r:.-y.ar: nut puLiic I ~ teatlwnY, although the Chair wY open the renting for public i i ! i iuput. ~ 1• 367 (COntlaaed few NaY 16, 1990) I x. 369 I HILLSZDS/SAPPRIAN VBNTORE Na8OLUT1Uw NO. 9U-x UY ( ~~~ ~ ~I A R830LUTION OP THP CITY COUNCIL OP TN8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~, 2NPAOV%lRNT ACABB!ffiNT 8%T8N8ION AND I I ~ LNPROVENENT 98CURITY FOR fAACT 13728 I. COUNCIL BtlaYRNf The following itsw Date been ragaeeted by Lhe CLLY Conrail for direuarioa. SheY are not puDiia boring itwr, although the Chair rY open Lhe wellay for pablie input. 1. Sd)NBID^AATION OF RECOtBRNDATION tOR TRIAD ALTERNATt POA AB 939 TASK LOACR (Oral Report b7 Taek 7oroe Nr~brrj 2. fAN@1piMTION O} TIIR CAP8UL8 AT CLVIC C[NTER - 3)Z Diwuuion of ltsma, length of time, end rare for Time Capsule et C1Ylo linter. 3. REPORT ON STATII9 01 GARAGE AiOtlIRRlRIIT9 IN NIILTI-FAMILY PROJ%CT9 375 City Council lu3enda June 6, 1990 PAGE This ie the ties for City Comeil to idatify the 1!a/ thq eiah to diacu/a a! the Wert wlLey. These ita/ will not M discucacd at this acting, only idatiti/d for the Wert i ~ acting. I ~ R. WIDW1fIC1TI0Y/ IgON T8t POaLIC Thies i/ the Lies and place for the gearal pohlic to addreee i the City Co::acil. Dtita ... yiohlLi is ine Ciiy Lomcii z.w ~ t addrec/inq any iasw not prcvioncly included m the 1lgenda. The Cit7 Comcil ay meive bstiaey and ut the atbr for a aubcegeat aeliaq. CoaMnt/ are W M linitcd to five i einute/ per individal. L. aDJBDaamx 706TIa70 TO aDJ00t11 TO gItCVfI9f eggy011 2b DI{COgD piRtOlpQ. Ma97.'BRD. EZ[COTI9S DtttIgf SV ADJOOO Sq DOD~T M~9' 0! JWR 7, 1990 11T 6100 P.M., iOCRTIOII TO Di •101001M.m. 1, U/Ores J. Ilnan/, City Cierk or Lhe City of Mneho Cuaaeangl, i hereby certify that • true, accurate cagy of the foregoing ag/ntle was posted on Rey 25, 1990, uvmty-two (72) hour/ prior to the wting per Dovernant Code 54953 at 9320-C Dose Line Road. i May 2, 1990 CITY OP AANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Rewlar Neetinc A CALL TO OADHR A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, May 2, 1990, in the Lions Perk Community Center, 9161 Basa Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Celifornin. The meeting wne ca11aQ to order et '1:64 p.m. 6y Mayor Dennis L. 9touL. present were Councilnesdoere: William J. Alexander, Deborah B. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and MayoY Denn1• L. Stout. Also present were: Jerk Lam, Clty Hanagsr; Andrew Asezyneki, Assistant City Attorney; Linde D. Dmiala, Deputy City Msnageri Rick 6amea, Community Development Director) Olen Jonas, 9r. RDA Analyst) Ruea 14quiie, City Engineer; Welt Btickney, Iuaociatee Civll Engineer) Jerry Grant, Building Official) Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Alan Narrsn, Aasociaie Planners Miki Brett, Consultant; ^' Richard Alcorn, ,Code) Enforcement. Superviaor;~ Jim , Hart, Administrative services Director] Joe Schultz, Community Services Nanagsr; Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst; Susan Hickey, Administrative Aides and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. f • • R • f B1. Presenter ion to Lloyd Michael, Mtiring General Naneger, Cucemonge County Wetar OSatrict. Mayor Stout preaentatl the proclamation io Lloyd Michael. B.. P.aynr S.c..t a.-.ncuncad L.a,. w~ACilaaabar Br,;wa has 6vn appointed to ores on LAFCO. E Ii • f R 1~ City Council Hinutee Nay 2, 1990 Page 2 C1. Ron 2lebarth, resident of Rancho Cucamonga who was representing property owners who own recreational vehicle e, stated they would like to submit a petition requesting the City Council to hold public hearings to change the Ordinance to allow residents to park their RV's on their own property. He a18o stated they would like a moratorium an the current Ordinance until the public hearing takes place. Mayor Stout asked hvo to submit their petition to the City Clerk. Nr. 2leharth stated he would do this on Thursday, May 3 after he has made copies. Mayor Stout stated with regard to the AV issue, this matter would be discussed at the next meeting. Richard Alcorn, Code Snforcrosent Supervisor, confirmed it should probably be ready for the May 16 meeting. Andrew Arezyneki, Resistant City Attorney, stated that depending on what the City Council decided, thi• is pazt of the Development Code and that it would Rave to go through the Planning Cosmieeion. C2. Steve Manning, PYeeident of Rancho Little League, stated various concerns with the facllitiae in which they piny their games. Be stated they are asking for immediate approval of temporary storage contatnere, and stated they would like an agreement to improve Old Town Park to meet game playing needs for the .... ......... .,~ ..... ......... .. et ... p .e uy a yvLa~iw which addressee their ~concerne, but was notareedy to submit it at the present time. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated staff has had convereakione with Mr. Manning and that they are working on solutions to hie problems. He further stated he would meet with him on Friday, which was acceptable to Mr. Manning. Mayor Stout felt the park issue should be referred to the Park 6 Recreation Caiusieeion for eheiz May 17 meeting. He suggested that their recommandntien come back io the City Council. C3. Betty willieme, Rinlock Street, complained about people parking on her street while they are ettendinq Little League gaawe at Church Strwt Park. She ainind it nee linen difficult for her to get her matt Gceuss of this sicustion. Mayor Stout suggested that ehs Little Lesgus participants be sensitive to perking on Rinlock and not blocking residents' mailboxes. C4. Mayor Stout announced that the dedication of Old Town Park was Saturday and would be In conjunction with Cinco de Mayo. City Council Mlnutee May 2, 1990 Page 3 C5. Councilmamber Brown stated that the residents from Nordic Development have asked that an emergency item be added to the agenda to consider possible litiget ion. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to add an emergency item on the agenda regarding Nordic Development. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Hayor Stout stated this would be the last item under Council Business. • • • • • a p. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval o£ Minutes: April 4, 1990 D2. Approval of Warrant e, Aegieter Noe. 4/18/90 and 4/25/90; and Payroll ending 6/11/90 for the total amount of $1,705,568.71. D3. Approval io transfer $80,400.00 between Community Development Block Ornnt funded Southwest Cucamonga street Improvement projects. ITEM POLLED !OR DISCUSBIOM AY MAYOR STOUT. D4. Approval to adopt a resolution in support of tl. R. 3389 which ie the Billboard Control Act of 1989. AESOLUTION NO. 90-175 A RESOLVTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPORT H.A. 3389, TH6 BILLBOARD CONTROL ACT OF 1989 D5. Approval to award and execute a ProPeeeional Services Agreement (CO 90- 064) with RJM Design Group, Incorporated, to prepare plane, spec Lficatione and estimates for landscaping the Milliken Avenue Underpass Sast and West Parkways (7th Street to Jersey Boulevard) and Median (SLh Street to Jsrssy Boulsvard) for e fes not to exceed $37,000.00 to 6e paid free the Redevelopment Agency funds, Account No. 13-503p0. An additional lOt contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. D5. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Nap 9350, located on the nozthsasL corner of Bses Line Road and Milliken n.aiiua, aubali CCad by Inv viii ism Lyan Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-176 A RESOLUTION OF TA8 CITY COUNCIL O! TIR CITY O! RANCRO CUCAMONOAr CALIlORNIAr APPROYINO SMPAOVElQIIT AOAEElQNT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY !OR PARCEL IfAP 9350 City Council Minutae May 2, 1990 Page 4 07. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement extension for Tract 10369 located on the west aide of Sapphire street at Thoroughbred Street, submitted by Walton Hillside Hetatee. RNSOLUTION NO. 90-177 A ABSOLUTION OF TiA$ CITY COUNCIL OP TA6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVBMRNT AGREEMENT BXTBNSION AND IMPROVEMENT 38COAITY POA TAACf 10349 D8. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9498 located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street, submitted Dy Reiter-Rinker Gateway. RESOLVTION NO. 90-178 A ABSOLUTION OF TBH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMBNT AGREEMENT SxTENSION AND IMPROVBNENT SECOAITY POR PARCBL MAP 9498 D9. Approval to accept Improvements, Aslesae of Bonds and Notice of Completion for: nR 07-Ofi, to a ed on he eo base orner of ~ ^•+~ --n .wn e.,~ Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 90-179 A RESOLUTION OP TNS CITY COUNCIL OF TA8 CITY OP Al1NCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR DR E7-O6 AND AUTHORIZING TtR PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION POA THS WORR DA 081 1 c t d th oath aid f 9th Strast ba -a n Hell AvenLa and Vineyard Aoenua Release, Faithful Performance Bond (Straei) $ 31,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90-180 A RESOLUTION OP TBE CITY COUNCIL OP TN6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TAE PGELIC IMPROVEMEIITE /OR DA BB-21 AND AUTHORIZING THi PILING OP A [70TIC6 OP COMPLETIOp -OR TR6 WORK D10. Approval to accept the old Town Puk ProjaM. City Council Minutes Nay 2, 1990 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 90-181 A RRSOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF AANCNO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC ZMPROVENENTS FOR TRS OLD TONN PARR PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING TH6 FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THS HORS 011. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Public Hearing on ,Tune 6, 1990 to levy the Annual Aeaeeemente and approve the Final Engineer's Reports for Landscape Maintenance Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, a, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 90-182 a ovare rn•rnu no muv nrmv mrrurrr nc ____ ____ __ ._-.....J CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ^ OP^ CITY 6NGINEBA'S ANNUAL AHPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE NAINTHNANCS DISTRICTS NDNHER$ 1, 2, 3A, 30 6, 5, 6, 7 AND S RESOLUTION NO. 90-183 A AESOLDTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OP W1NCH0 CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMBNTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE tMINTSNANC6 DISTRICTS NUMBERS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, b, 7 AND S POA FISCAL YEAR 1990/41 PUNSUANT TO THH LANDSCAPING AND LIGNTINO ACT OP 1972, AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACB FOA FDSARIN6 OHJECTIONB T®iBTO 012. Approvel of PrellmLnery 8ngineer'e Reports and Betting Public Naesing on .Tune 6, 1990 to levy the Annual Aeeeeamante end approve the Pinel Engineer's Reports for LightLng Maintenance Diatricie Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. RESOLUTION NO. 90-186 A RESOLUTION OP TN6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S 71NNUAL REPORTS POA LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NUNSERS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, AND 6 RESOLUTION NO. 90-185 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL O! THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, r_PSIPOP1tIA, DECLA.4INC ITS ZNTENTZCN LEVY AAO COLLECT ASSSSSMENTB NITHIN LIGHTING NAINTENANC6 DISTRICTS NUNBERB 1, 2, 3, 6, 5, AND 6 POR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 PURAUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIONTIN6 ACT OP 3972r AHD O116RINC A TINS AND PLACB POA NEARING OHJECTIONB THERETO MOTIONS Moved by Alexander, seconded Dy Nright to approve the balance of the Caneent Calendar Hith the exception of Item number D3. Motion serried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes May 2, 1990 Page 6 • • . • . + DISCVSSION O! ITIDI D3. Approval Lo transfer $80,600.00 between Coouaitp Developaeat Bloek Orant forded southwest Cucaaoaga Straat Isprovaaent projacta. Mayor Stout stated he did not know why the money ~:ne being transferred. Ruse Maguire, Clty Hngineer, eteted it wne mostly because of Placida Ccurt. MOTION: Moved by Stout, eeconded by Buquet to approve Stem D3. NoiiOn carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONBBNT ORDINANCH9 No Items Submitted. T. ADVBRTI SBD POBLIC Hsl1RINO6 P1. CONSIDERATION OF A RE°OLO'~'ION DESIGNATING STR.aMG L NR A A PRII TB T AND °XEMPTING TH8 ANUTTZNC PROPERTIES FAON REOVIREHENTS SST FOATA IN Ca PTHR 12.08 OP THE MONICIPAL CODE Staff report presented by Nelt Sticknay, Associate Civil Engineer. Councllmember Alexander caked if the Pire District had reviewed this. Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer, stated nc. Councilmember Alexander euygeeted the District look at this before council makes a deciaLon. He also axpreesed hie concern for the one access only situation. Hayor Stovt opened the meeting for public henzing. Addressing the City Council were: Don Smith who elated ha fell this street could be extended. Mayor Stout eked Lf there was some kind of agreement Deiween ihs hamaownere to me intein the at reset. Mr. smith stated they did not have an agreement, Dut felt everyone wee in egreament about maintaining it. Councllmambar Wright asked what wee at the end of 9treng Lena. Mr. Smith stated there wee a gully, but felt it could still b• sxtandad. eusan Donnelly, Strang Lena, stated that if a atraat was to go through, Lt would teka a lot of paopla'• property away. city Council Minutes Hay 2, 1990 Page 7 Tam Barry described in detail the elevation situation. Helvin Pearl informed the Council of the cooperation among the residents of their etraet. Gary Thompson stated he felt the majority of the neighborhood is In favor of making this a private atreet. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Jack Lem, City Hanager, stated a corrected Resolution had been distributed for the Council to consider for approval. Councilmember Alexander asked if Council aooroved tho Rnunl~_t+^-, uuw is atop them from negotiating with the property owners. Auae Haguire, City Engineer, stated this is only an action to make this a private atreet. Mayor Stout suggested that it be noted that the ree idente were in tavor of thi e. Halt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer, suggested this be added to the Resolution. Council concurred to add the following e[etemant io "Exhibit A^ of the Resolution: Sixty percent (60t( of the property owners signed the petition, one Hundred percent (100e( of the property owners at the public hearing were in favor of the private etraet designation. RESOLUTION NO. 90-186 A RESOLUTION OF THR CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONOAr CALIPORNiA, DSSIGNATI NG STRANG LANG AS A PRIVATE STABBT AND SYSMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM RBQUTAE!ffiNTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 90-136 ae corrected. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. P2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR OAANT APPLICATION FI8 L yEAA 1990-91 - Tha ndoption of the final Statement of Community Developamnt Obiectivu for program year 1990-91 and the preliminary ealsetion of psoSeete based on en anticipated grant of $463,000.00. staff report presented by Nark McCOllom, CDBO Consultant. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public Maring. There being no response, tM public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes May 2, 1990 Page 8 Counnilmember Brown inquired if the $30,000 could coma from the ADA houeinq 6et- aeide. Mark McCOllam, CDHG Consultant, explained how the money was to be used. Jack Lamr City Manager, stated the $6,000 could not came from the houeinq eet- aeide funds and further explained this. Mayor Stout stated he would like Yo see $24,000 go toward the graffiti program. Mark HCCOllom, COBG Consultant, stated he would make that modification within the allocation. RESOLUTION NO. 90-107 A R8SOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCNO CUCAMONOA, CALIPORNIA, ADOPTING TH8 BINAL 9TATSHSNT OP WMHUNITY OBVSLOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OP PUNDS POR 1716 C0141UNITY DBVBLOPMSNT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM POA PROGRAM YEAR 1990-91. HOT ION: Moved 6y stout, seconded by Buqust to approve Resolution No. 90-187 ae amended. Notion carried unanimously, S-0. . ~ . Ri CTNRRT NaYP LN 1NI]R On-M - L1TV I,9 Ra Nl6:I~ ITLA V,»lnf -_ n_N_ •_ i_.F._....n the name of Rochester Avenue (old portion) from 4th Straw[ to a point approximately 600 East north of 6th Street, n diaianee of approximately a/10 of e mile. Planning Commission recommended name change to Charles Smith Avenue. Proposal to also change the name of the portion aL Rochester Avenue (new portion south of 6th Street). Planning Conmieeion recommended name change to Rochester Court. Alternative street -ease may be considered by the City Council. Staff report presented 6y Alan Narren, Associate Civil Engineer. Mayor Stout opened the mee[ing for public hearing. There being no response, the public hear inq was closed. Councilmember Buquet stated he has concerns with uainq both the Eiret and lase name Eor a street. Ne felt the city should steer sway Erom doing this in the future. Councilmember Brown stated she agreed with Councilmembes SuquaL. IIESOLUTIOtI NO. 90-188 A RESOLUTION OF TN6 CITY COUNCIL OT TH6 CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALITOANIA, APPROVING STREET NAME CAtANOE NO. 90-01 TO CHANGE THE NAME OF 1110 PORTIONS OF ROCHEeTER AVENUR TO CHARLES SMITH AVENUE AND ROCHESTER WORT REBPEGTIVELY City Council Minutes May 2, 1990 Page 9 NOTION: Moved by BYOWn, seconded by Alexander to approve Rego luiion No. 90-188. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. 6. PUBLIC aarana CI. COpS-.7-AAT-ON OF N uP% r OP NOTI & 1b ATS POBLIC AJZSAgCES By~~ ETIWANDA AVENGE - APN 229-061-11 (COntiaued Eros April 1B, 1990) Staff report by Richard Alcorn, code Enforcement Supervisor. council inquired about the flags that were in the picture e. Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, stated they are permitted for uses such as at model home complexes. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Address ing the City Council wee: [nrayne Bailey, representing Patchack Development, stated theca was nn easement agreement, but that the City can no longer find a copy o! it. He elated they have attempted to clean up the area. Councilmamber Buquet asked him the last time he saw the propezty. Mr. galley stated today. Councilmember Buquet suggested he look at the picture c. Mayor stout explained to Mr. Bailey that the fings are only allowed for each uses ae nt sales complexes for apartments and at model home complexes. There being no further response, the pu611c hearing was closed. Mayor Stout informed the Council ae to why the Planning Commission wanted the trail in the place ii is in, end that with the condition it Le in now, it was not doing anything for the appearance o! the neighborhood. Me added hs felt they should maintain the trail and that the appeal should be denied. MOTION: Moved by stout, seconded by Brown to deny the appeal. Motion enrried unanimously, 5-0. • • • • R f 0. CITr MAIfABEB~s exaee oeonema H1. CONBIDBRATION O! TAtCT 13318 K Y R YO - Davelopar•• request o! April 25, 1990 to sccept • cash deposit Sn lieu of withholding occupancy. eta[f report proentod by Ause Msquise, City ~ngineez. City Council Hinutae Hay 2, 1990 Page 10 John Bayoun, representing Mayflower-Bayoun, stated that they would put up the deg~eit in order to move in. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to accept the deposit and not hold up occupancy. Notion carried unanimously, 5-D. • ~ ~ . . . I CODNCIL BDSIREBS I1. CITY ADDRESSING POLICIBS Staff report presented by Jerty Grant, Building Official. _ - ____ oorod that thw ordinance decline with street address posting be handlad'eeparately from the curb painting ordinance. Councilmember Wright stated the agreed with eeparntinq the two issues. The Council concurred that etreei address poetiny should come back at the May 16 meeting for first reading. Mayor Stout stated he would like to give the curb painting issue soma more thought. Couneilmamber Brown etstad ae Mayor Stout stated earlier, thnt the council needs to know what kind of money commitment is involved. The Council concurred that the curb painting issue should case bask with additional information. Counc llmember Wright euggeeied when this Lnfocmat ion ie brought hack, that it include alternatives to financing of painting curbs, what other cities era doing, and what the City Se doing now to have this done, and maybe soma other _zeat ive eolut ionw other arses have checked into. ACTION: Item to coma beck at the May 16 meeting. • x . ~ Iy, arnxnamrON TO A_RpAOVE TNS TEMPORaay yARIANCE OP THE SPORT9 FIELD LIOHT r"-mpgq POLICY AT RED NIL CITRD9 LITTLE IR~Otne SENIOR FIELD YOR TFDS DAT68 Op JULY D - Thic variaacc will apply oni:• to the 90-feet bane path field located at the northwest and of Aad Hill Park. Staff report presented by Joe echults, Community Services Manager. The Council asked questions as to what affects this would have by approving the v¢rlanca. Councl7mtmWr Wright expressed hu concerns about patrol !or the uea. City council Mlnutee May 2, 1990 Page it MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Buquet to approve the temporary variance. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. R R R • . I3. DI rr1~SION ON SUPPORT OP CIiINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'5 POSITION AND WATER COWSERVATIOW ISSUES MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to refer this to the Environmental Management Commission. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. I4. CONSIDERATION OP RESOLUTIONS SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OP PROPOSITIONS 303 311. AND 116 Staff report presented by Rick Goner, Community Development Director. Councilmember Brown stated Proposition 111 must pass for the commuter rail to happen. RESOLUTION NO. 90-389 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCRO CUCAMOAGR, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSI^a ION llo, THE ARIL TRANSPORTATION BONG ACf MnTTONr NnvM by nlorRnd~.. nnAnr) by Rrnun M • v. nnanlaH nn 4n On-tPm Motion carried unanimously, 5~0. RESOLUTION NO. 90-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNC IL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION lllr THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF AND SPENDING LIMITATION ACT OP 1990, ANTI PROPOSITION 108, THB PASSENGER RAIL AND CLEAN AIA BOND ACT OP 1990 MOTION: Moved by Baguet, seconded by Wright to npprove Resolution No. 90-190. Motion cnrriad unanimously, 5-0. R R R• R R Msyor Stout called a racoon et 9114 p.m. The mwting was called back to order et 9:25 p.m. with all member of Council present. R • • • R 15. 6TTNA~IDA NORTH ANNEIATION AND SPECIFIC PLAN STRAT66Y -Report by Council Subconmlttaa. (oral Report) 9tatt report puuntsd by Lazry Nmdarwn, Principal Planner. City Council Minutes May 2, 1990 Page 12 ' Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. addressing the City Council was: Joe DiIorio, repreeeneing the 8tiwanda North Landowners Consortium and a couple of other property owners in the arse. Ne read the Eollowing letter into the record: "May 2, 1990 Ciiy Council Members City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Ae: Rtiwanda North strategy Dear Gentle People: The following Ls the response of the 6tiwanda North Landowners Consortium to the city Council•e Subcommittee report ont he 6tiwanda North annexaticn. The Consortium wishes to remain cooperative wish the City•^ elforte while developing our properties with the rights given ue to ue by the County's Oenersl Plan. It Ss our desire to produce a eamownity thnt seta the highest nverell standards for design, social and fiscal responsibility to In that light, wa suggest that in considering the Bubco®ittee•s report the following items be brought forth: i. It may not be Ln the City's beet interests to refuse to annex properties in the future. 2. It probably would bo non-productive to litigate to enforce e eat of standards that may Do intarnnlly inconeiatent, but it should be very productive for the City and County staff to work cooperatively on the development o! 6tiwanda North. annexation must be a cooperative effort to be eucceeeful, now or Ln tN future. we again offer to cooperate in satisfying goals o! the City and County xF.ile respect!..^.g the lsrda,.^..ers' r!q.^.U. Ne suggest that a rriiea by the 8ubcomaittee jointly with Staff and ConeortLum representatives W held so thnt various Lsavea may be sddreasad in the proper form. Thank you [or your willingness to take into account the feelings of the peopL moat affected Dy your actions. city council Minutes May 2, 1990 Page 13 Yours truly, /e/ Joseph N. OiIOrio, for the Etiwanda North Landowners Consortium JND/j ae" He also stated that in a previous letter he had written to Brad Huller, City Planner, he indicated he felt there was a communications problem. He felt the landowners do want to build a good community. There being no further response, the public input session was closed. Councilmember Brown asked why, if the consortium wanted io make things good in Rancho Cucamonga, do they want to go to the County to get plane approved knowing their etandarde are lower Shen the City's. Mr. DiIOrio did not feel County etandarde ware lower than the City's. councilmwember Buquet felt there was a lack of continuity Prom Che Etiwanda North area compared to the rest of the City. Ne felt the County should let the City process the proposed projects and let the City maintain them. Mayor Stout stated he felt the staff and Planning Commission have done a good job. He diu not feel compromiee• should be considered. Ha also stated since this was in the County arse to go ahead and let the County develop i!. He did __ _ ._.1_ •4i _n ____ bid Yn M .d he..~n.e Fe i~H •Au_ nt_P.. AIA ..~ -..~ _ -..n• •n..u.. .. neceaearlly have to have this land. Councilmenibez Wright stated she liked the strategy and felt it would help the present situation and assist for the future. Mayor Stout stated that just because someone gets a project approved by the County dose not preclude them frga going back through the City process. Councilmember Brown asked if this could go before the entire Board of Hupervieore to try to turn over the planning of this in order to meet Clty etandarde for Du Siding. Andcew Azezyneki, Assistant City Attorney, stated the Board would have to adopt n policy about this. Councilmember Brown felt this avenue should be inveetigatsd. CouncilawmWrn Buquet and Wright concurred. CouncilawAaber Brown stated she would like thin raeoaraendation to go to the Board of supervisors. MOTIONI Moved by Brown, ncondad by Wright to confirm the dlreotion o! the eubco®Lttw. Motion carried unanLoouely, 5-0. City Council Minutes Hay Z, 1990 Page 14 MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Wright that the City correspond with the Board of Supervleore that they take action on the City's request of last November and that they be Lnformed of what action the Council took at thle meeting. Mat ion carried unanlmously, 5-0. f f R• f f Ib. S IO S I SP YING PROGRAM (Oral Beport) Councilmember Wright stated chat it ie her underetnnding that the City can buy beneficial ineecte that might need to be replaced in the City dus to the malathion spraying. She felt possibly some funds could be allocated for this, and asked staff to investigate the poeeibility. Councilmember Baguet etnted hie question was if the Slate really hee [hinge under control now, because if they didn't, he did not want to bring new ineecte into the City and hove them sprayed with malathion. The coat factor for purchasing the ineecte was oleo dlecueeed. Councilmember Wright suggested this go to the Bnvironaental Nanngement Commission to come up with a plan. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to sand this Ls sue to the Environmental Management Ca®Seaion. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. The Council raceeeed at 10,12 p.m. to Sxecut ive Seeeion. The Council reconvened at 10:21 p.m. with all members present. 1 f 1 R R R 27. Andrew Aresyneki, Aeeiatant CLty Attorney, stated he Se reconmending the City Council instruct hle office to initiate litigation with the developer to obtain injunctive relief to insure that Rordic hamea currently under conatructlon and completed homes comply with Nealth and Safety Coda raquirementa, and Lf possible, to get Lhe court's authorisation to withdraw building permits from Y.oueae widei conetruutiun pending cwmpietiun wf safety inspectTUne fraw corrections of existing homes. Mayor Stout asked if Nr. Arezynaki had a tLne line. Andrew Aresynekl, Aaaletant City Attorney, stated they anticipate having eomethinq filed Mfore the nett Clty Council meeting. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded 6y Alexander to proceed a stipulated by LM Assistant City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City council Hinutee Hay 2, 1990 Page 15 Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Resident from Paradise tract in Colton stated she feels Colton•e City Council was very weak, end asked the Council if they could contact the Mayor of Colton and ask them to take the same action that Aancho Cucamonca has taken. Councilmembar Brown stated that she and Aick Gomez, Community Development Director, would ba going on Monday to Sacramento to testify before a Senate committee regarding the "Bad Builders Ordinance". John Huggins stated he would like to see the engineer come to the teat of the houses and check them also. Mre. Huggins stated she appreciated what the City ie doing and for tiling the lawsuit. Jan Wilder expressed her concerns for the coat to get repairs made to their home and for legal fees resulting from tiling the lawsuit. she asked if the City could check into a way in which they could get financial aeeietanca for these costa. She commended Jerry Grant £or all of his efforts, but did not feel he ehculd have had to do what he did alone. There being no further response, Mayor stout closed the public input session. J. IDERTIlIGTIOR O! ITEMS !OR IIEIT MEETIND J1. Councilmember Alexander felt the relief aeeietanca item for Nordic should come back. R f R f R f g. COIONNIGTION6 FROM TRB Pb'Bi.1C Rl. Lewis Trout asked for staff to check Lnto the CBQA rsgulatione ee Lt relates io the replecmaent of bugs due to the melathion spraying. Jack Lamy City Manager, stated they would check into this, but fell thin was en emergency acticn, and emergency actions era exewp6 from C6gA. R2. Duane Glaee, Stratton Court, askW whet ttw lima frame was for the inspector who would come out to inepeM his houw in the Nordic Dwelopment. Councilmember Buqust stated they seated Mr. Sullivan to do an inspaotion of each houo. Councilmsmber Brown suggested that Mr. Glaze work with Aick Ooalea, Community Development Director. City Council Ninutae May 2, 1990 Page 16 Rick Gomez, Camaunity Development Director, stated that new that the program 18 in plnce, he would schedule Hr. Glace' inspection. ft3. Mark Gutglevck expressed hie concern for the children who live in Heritage Park in Fontena that are going to school in the Etiwanda School District. He also asked if hie publication could be left at City tacilities ae handouts for the public. Sack Lam, City Hanager, atatad he could leave copies of hie pu611cation in City facil Sties ae long as he did not indicate it wne a publication fzam the City of Rancho Cucamonga. He ndded chat in the future, alaff will be considering policies and procedures for outside publications in City public buildings, but this hev not l.so~ .,.,...e..lin1~M vst_ Re stated at the present time, Re ie free to leave them at City facilities it he wishes. : • ~ • a ~ NOTION: Moved 6y Brown, seconded by Alexander to adjourn the City Council to Executive sees ion to diecuu labor relations, and for the Redevelopwnt Agency to adjourn to complete their Execwtiw session regarding property acquisition. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. The City Council and RMavelopment Agency meetings adjourned at 10:48 p.m. Debra S. Adams City Clerk approved, ~~ ...................its"iiiiiiii.......iiiiiiisi.... ::W:.~ ~.. :;:e : o ~ ~2W ~ .. ~n V V~WW VV~ • N~r~~J i~i Ytaa ~ • V N~fJ~~YU ~ u i nV~n i ~NiW JJV)F~ OOH FJJiu JYNiiM1 Jne J Y?iNiiwwiMNt w ~~ i~ O O N~YV~[• ~~1~~~~i1i~~i lienieelY~ie~a~iu r O OSr ~w~<i~~hZ.~0e00<~reCl~l1~O~Y~1w H n ~ ~ ~ n n nor n~ ' nnn~~NnnnT~ nn~ n inNNw oYaoaeoo.a_....rYOr~a..o.re~r,ono.noorra<rYYYreYL~m >e..oore..<~r.nen~on~nrrn~o.Y.ern>rao~...ororaaoer~ wV a J ~iw NwY JVr C ~JY r iwrw`ii ~nr i~wJ •L r~FVS~yJIF it~'~jiwiiii:~4UluJVwu~~FOYnriy'W N~h~~rfnUUiF J.~i oYOn VJe~j?j~UUYJJi •YrVYOnnVt1+OLeO~uYeirrULJJtaa= UUVV4VYUUVUVUV UCOOOYYCCOOOO~wVUWWrLLLLVYVYYLLZiSii~ TwrywYwn_nnYllMrwwN rl~Y irw h/1 ~IlAlII•JiFlNnT1YnO1Nh w~l h.0 r~ O y • •YnNeY ~ wLYwOOYwOYwnL000.1 I~•n'~1Nr~w •• rAAUA~1~w•F~~Tnnl~~rrwr/Iwr,Iln^nnnnnrSS w . e ~.mwwem .w.ww. w i woao.o a.e ._._w._w~ ,. =e= ~~. - i ~_ ~~~ - w ~~~:~_ °ae ;w..:e.w;: e„ »;,~:: wM;1YrYYJJJ~JJJJJJJJJJJJ •J JJJJi Zittiif iiZO0oo0000i~~ Z'""A:~~A~:S:°~~nw.•wrhrlrOi~~r~i Z1+. 1an FNr~inNOiM1wnO~tinnVi n~ rv wow NM n Jw iVw NO •w n.,nHwM1 NNe~w wh N ~wM nFlM ~1wi1 FlInFln w' wV1 NMNw~ nrv nww m ww Fln ...em.~~moooeeo.oaoe.e~meoe.o~~..~..om~e.o_ee.~°oo~ aaoooa~a..ooe.e.ooe~.e>,ano°e.a.hee~~~.°ae~ve<,~oee .aa~_mmoe°o~~~~voo.amoaee~~mae~~.ve~~Pao<oae.e~...P a..~a_~.>.~.a~~.~e.,~.~mea~.e~..~a~.. ~a~._.a~...~n :m.~a~oao_~~.~«.ae.~T.~.~.ao.~~..a~..o_~~.~e~.ae.,T o ...........................i:i"s........i::......... ,~ a - - ~: Ni...o:owN::::so. ~o~o. m~~.oe:na..e aa=Y+~v.+oh..o..e ~..MN»~ ~~W e~ s niiiiiinninm:weiirviw~ 1 :i n~ iS CS '° ~V1w1~6V~ ~i~ oiN~U~ ~OVV Wii7w •~w~ ~~~if ifiiiil• ~aaeaaAea.ae wnnn wna~~~~w :; E 1 1 1 I I I, I 1 I 1 m a mOpO O ea•anpNOONO•O•NN O O.pOm000 aTaNhPONhO010NOPN• Xt~ ! • m aNNN J•OmNVmnNOOho.IwO ~i a r m h m a Pe Naa °p m mhmnePervmo m• v r..l arpNPh H 'mNNaNN NN OmnvaP \• n N OP N :m m ~ .j O• n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n :'i i• • • s sn n•n nrnwwr•irwn lPWNNmaNenPem•nmhltlhePeNNmann•weNNmaNaT•PpM1nmaNa ZY ••00hhmmNNhM1maM1MVVOONNNNmmmmmmmmma••a••aaa•Nn • wPP PP0000+VmmnNnNnNMNNnNnNPNnNNNnNNNNNnnNnn Xrc Oa••••alaaal•aa•Ia••aa•i 1.Iaaaaa•a••alia•a1a•••••aa•a iii 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I •i w 1 1 • O ON 11 U • P TOtw ~W.~\AVN O\V mxTx F • 000 PIOFO•N NONE 2 N • • 1 • • aUa all •aSf J V •LL J J i V Z < !hLL h J i Z Iw O \ rL h JSW J ¢Nf •O V V VOV ZV V<V~ { OOW W O viv V Vewa VF. 2 LNP V V V V VLV VVV6VJV V iY V\VU i \ rth\ X X 9 2 O h[ ilw ii V2m x 2 MN. Z M C N N 9{N h> F\N W ! J VN J U¢\ Y M Y i WSJ t O N<\>VN• \ \ \ \ \ Z G SY.W ONW> Mr aOlwO Ofo a 0 O \ ZZN fM1W ILhV NY ~ J J'JVZ U_I ~2X \ \ { y F W \ SY{ W> Nl~W t<I~l NU U\NWLF LLOO N n m m m C Z N iQN 6\2 09WNr 6 S !y°. N W:Wb <zux io ZJN'LLJw O O O J> h O ONJ NZ VNFY2 flw Fr2 NZ 6h •v O M ~ N LL» F~{ W 2pi WJL JIWF LLV6\ T 4Nw H H h F Z U h [ i 7 V M1ISYV LYWi O>7WWf On6 O O SSfw2VZOCMf¢NnNnJUG Ilu O O O O Z 2 ¢JNM1 UZWfZWMOf 00 JOZ JZ Z 6Y[> >L h J>hNiOLLJ6h~J<fN 1[ I[ { S LL Y WLL1yWW{ O KO<f Z 7WUUUSN LL V U u U U x hY0 f JJIWVNVwWfOO1L<N\Ww u h S>09v s\U hvVJ SFNO¢NhC[ Ili O h. h O LLwVhLL6 'JNVfh>¢JVFI'JSiYOFZV i ZFZFSGW V2L9 Nf-f OLLhhLLrDlZOJVO J 7W00> f ^JMW~ PWY¢O¢p{¢ > > > > > i-I > N O G f VSJAVUf V NCENSVL OOwYJFV<OiG s w Y O Z II X vN O II Y •F F f O Z L OM ZM y h { h U VJ OV II X Z vO ! ~ O O N iNLN ¢ J JU LLi{N h h Z c an. ~S.ua a i w J y S O J V p YWN UwNS~VW O 9 2 V V L NNNW\xW V J O Z 0¢ 6 V W01{ SN{W7YZ W Y ¢ O U • U VOM1 JM1{ ~W N S fLW~ h h Z M1 { ZiYO S! ihV SViVUFY U II > > a S S PWZSVM6 S VZ0 VNfxVOWOlIOUJJi u O u J O i ~ 1Yfl~p2 f CV W9Wf O 1M h 11 LL G N• 2 y M y Oy O al JOS[ILL O ViWWhLN 11 O Z o O Wi~J Uf_J O 70M1<W___LLOW Wf wW Oi i W W_ O J x r1 V: WOiF O{M1xJ ! LO 1 X v v {• Y W i O 6 i VZO>LLW\ J >Wi0'JYYVi[MY~NW OYh~VV RW~ ! O ~ i ~ S W ~ ~ W MWVJVON ~ {f~SFWilSO OXZiV VilWJ~ •[• O: i• M O> ! Y>iJW20 2 SJVMGf W VINI[V iORNJY ~{• ~ O i x • J 9Wf h JJ[![tZiNM ifffWW :L; N N I M N< Z S 0 W S !¢YNNNS O N<f « f{f ff•tO0.OO00 A II P a P N tl mONPnN N „vnaPOmN0100PwNPm>P SOX ry f P f P O~ r m M PPhmaNV n mOOmmmONNONOOMmaN OX N N N O • N • TT OrO,r v~ ~NOINNn• m XSX m m m m m r.l m M N mwNN m N M1 I>~ /_ m• \• NONNOOOOOOFNwYON•••OMNOOPONPNOOPFONVVNOONOMMOOOOOOOO FVOPONOOOM•NPO•NNIOFOONNVMNIONFOMONNOOFNOFOOOOOOOF ryMYP•~Oyp90FtYyNNOONmomF~[ ~•••~..~JVON Girf ~oOe~NNOP ONO•N11NwNVVN whNw~OiOPPbHOONNO •NFO~ wyONTOdN•0110d NMOO w N O ry wM• A V w N V •~ ~• s JNOPOwNn•NVFOPONNNVMVh>PONNNIN VhOPOwNN•N<FOPOJNAINIh nOnn„OVOOOOFFFFFFhhFFO000000000PPPPPPPPww00000000 NnNONnNnnNNNNNNNNNNMNNnNNnNMNNNNnNN0002NVVV >OVIV~IIIVV :11•V•Id1111d11111111•1•V•IIIIIIIVIffIVIVV 111111••~ 111•IIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIIId•IIV111V11•f 11VIVf u O iN°P ~<n Z„ Otp SZ WO ILNW Oj6 F L •M1i O V LL M1 Y p N • • • 000 O O 00 O N J 0 o OW e N ~ O N w ~N F W 10 U Y O_ ~~ 0 WL 00 ~N NWV +O J pi 1 pNf \\ WS N POw h L W Yf ~ W •yy00h ON : i{ h VNi W• • ~MNMIeOP P 2 OW wN { MWO ~ W 1 holl0 •N •^,I ~"' Sh~>. i.i ~~ iu i:l ii `o u •>L•i wFd WuNii•4.r '~ __ f•nJ O Y QiN N 10 OMO 000 W W >iNi M NW 1.. • L Jh 1 Yiw NJZLh 2 CK L ZZN ~ ii h9W i N iO 2 MMNL O WOf 0 W i0 Ntl F JL NW VN JiWW 7 YYY p_60LONJ 60NV N~YW 1 ~~ MO WiM ZZN<ZiZm a o1NV u>Jf 0H00YWN N OM NY JN~F JOM,MiOYVN O LJZNFI< OW i=_Mi YiNitl WW N <Ni60< M ryW V_ W W o7pf Z d< M Wtll.•hSYOW 2•V~IOONOO~OiOi LfNWMY•• NitYY6~ 7 iZ FWY>i iiVIZJ iJ i{N„Oy JN Um ON ~J JWOOV h0 FI ~LLf NO>M6 >iFM0L2 ONNVZOORLNW>n Otlw i Z < Z<i<Wi tNLW000Npwe WOWW<uN0 ~LLWi00N6FhN SMhwi >W i\OLO WLNMYI L FStw~OWG0J2 N NOVF Who<U J fdJHii\WJNWVNZLYL ftOhWWfiVNWNOWWyiYP W~wNMVwLLMJ JNJMJVNW<{<OWZ N<VN<6 JWpO•LZOW<O u JNNONNN JVSON„Op0 SOrh0J01NYaJNVff00Y 22WW2YZP WOtlh000YNLLOUQtl 62JMhMWKOZLLRM1 w10 WOwWWZtlNWtl~J ~tl60SY SGZJN000NYVN IiM<i00 OfVNW FI ILWFNLJJWVZNOWIOOLLMSV i•~ii°u.Li olLUesultl-u.°.io>iiwr~o i~iiiNiijaioaiiii.W. >o sw a~uin :.yhoiu°n N i i i •' > LL Y W i u { ~ W -•i N •. r Yu u i tl : ws rN N ~ u Wh r N YW J N S V N O O~ J r 9 h 2 _ Y N V M1Y WNVFYi OY f MM WL M1 V `1 •O N{Y W Wi O>F Y J S F~N2 ONNVV:O <M1 VWNV Y N!>i O YO S MN Y ii fYWJ VLLO WWOY>JYOiM FNOFi1NZ Sp0< NWih MNlY WZ YWNM LL GY JOM1 MF 0WJ OUWMYYN •!W YfV;=fF{Y•t fONff<1M! 0VZ OW Oi VN •NN N<Vf iYM\N<9 JhWNYJO 2<N<LF tOf• O M>000• YfeV'JF YY <tfYh faU DN Yp NOYL fOYN OFiWNi ~~YMhZNVU JYMWWNNii •Y NOi •i ZNiJii>fM• FSYf •WVa M>J Vtl~MW fOiFY •WO06 JNMiN OWOJ «NJ ZYNW ZLWMf<iY Jf OJiYOHfY WFiiWYWHM1ONOVNfYISN YyyIIOJihfW`NMNOw`Y <•tW W>fM h>~~htltlffJ IMOY iYtlFif~ii WfNM1Jif YYM>N wJJJi'JOVfIW200000~VJ"JjY<f<WWWUMMIO]f OZ0i1~wNM000~tfMJOY OOOOOOOVYVUVVUUUYYYJOOpO0000000WWWWWi1Li{iWWWYUYYYY•Y Itl1~~••M1.IYO•I~~wV00.O•I I~~d1I0OrTNI11000NAOPNIMryNIwPV~H10110 Pf 00•N•rF Ny0 N••nIOON ITwTryry ONNIwIh NMNIJONNNNN~pOONNywO•NwPNM NryNTMI/'w M N N Tm INT•y NMN 7 z SNP Sm U¢\ V_ 00 :ia \~ ~~ w ~ w U11 •O~ ~W~ Y ~ ~ Ilw~ •Z II AS• NNymbmhomNDm~~weemmaeyeeNOOroNeNOpoorooNNOm N eNONNbbNPOm OI•IOymNy00NOrmNOepNpNONOpw m N w~N PNrVNmOrMN rVnyagwPj.Oi y.pa y,ryOPNNNTNNNNNNN my,ymy w N •I r wyNN ~• n r N .. w N NNyNmhOPOwNmyNbrmPOw ry1.'y N0>mP0••N n1{N0>OP O~.IN OIy Norm 600••www NwwwwNNNNNNtl~NnNNtltltlPNNmmtlyabyy aeyyyNNmNNNNNN wamm OmNNp eiiiiiiiaiiiiiii i.yriiiiiaaiii~iaiaiaiiaivaiiai+i+aiii ~ m.m> mm. • . a mm { h mN u >hm `ui i ° z o w° ap ~w J as N r D ONn a Yis z <~ z im NO° ¢ iL i1°n '• iN: i uDS me uNi ~mn°YU nw~~ • i iW i ^ o °m PUia NtlnWb;Nrp z ..im w ... \hm i VV MO m0 S10V wV\O~ :6 wOy¢\U L••m>Ywnlm > {jam f I YO< N <N NwM _ _ VW SrNY2 NJNIO O_ZOR mN yrUwn~~•¢o S •OO O LL J6 (VS mM0 •6 O~h> mVLLLL N Vww < P N M wVNO¢¢¢NN ~ 1010•Wi~af ~~ SS< ¢JU¢F ONW\S>tt0< uOW wWr••OrMNh <_ Y_OiwJJOU ui~~m ~ ~ _~_••y _••• ~•••-V.-.- Oh ZOwm' _Ir_ OOLLOWJ W¢ iwwWO F LLLL<Nw W{¢CO ¢U W W~211.1 i O ULLr{ IU_LL<Y 00 u Ym¢i ry Ow •oJ pm NO wNYLL 00 LL¢¢ J _ iYUO~LLpI¢ ¢Ji ••O NWOO¢PLLJ • D~J• wrmU LLLLjLL_UU V__U OJ w_¢SOwhU1rYZMi mYWY{yHi>LLO\VO~N SJwWU¢ NNNO •~ w iu f OI¢NLL6r _fOViYwwwlW ••N ><W{MOLL LLu2/J r rlwN I..SU Z `ItNWUUU>SLLSSW iWr6>2f>LL••M { NW~NFFfPJ~M O{WOh JW O¢ Nu•==~F~WW00_WV<{MWm101~u=~uNOww~ > =N0M6~Zer ¢ JTMNVVrNrc NZ SJLOWr>LL '~wwwMM7tlZFZSYJh 2S TWNJw ¢h<rwVw¢ irt•7JZT\¢M» SOLLY LLW¢¢S Z1.IV wrTm O<WOUNZZWWVZi00LLJ<¢W¢OLLZ .~¢m¢wNN¢Oimii¢KNNMUii{oV~INmWS~CNm4SNOiiNl Z.wiiONM2NNY O YWw V LL Z ~+ w S V J JJO m ~ N O „m0 MW r O N N ut S 00 •• _ J • •N~n N N S n_ ._ ~ UC C w N W ZNNONS U Z1-U JJLLKNI = U >`Nj eS T: y N NDD Uf{ Np f m F 20 M • ui mJOO ~rz •{O ZN OODU tlpm(6 {M D O Y U w f> Wi DOW N hN •Vw a T w ~J JO WN S UVV rrN TJ t2mU MiOLLw ~JW DU ~T`iF UiUSJtlwJf a iNWNLL O{¢OWWfURwI¢ rmV02 Q N _ jrOr VJ MtlYiw Y••w JJZZp ZNUw hJ2=• OSIND Otl NZ •OW WWWNY¢WLL oJChJJD••'S Nm WLL~OJW>tl NJ 00 yWp `OSOO .O mm72fi{ fZ•wffM oJOh 20WiJWbU{ iNY¢N• JZZOMi U UtlWJ »rw • ipNZN uN6{WYJ FO 220WSWj9w •Nf {YS •S Y6RiNU2 f •iiWi SOCWWtl N{ J NNN Im_•Rh 0_D_O_O_SSOW_m_ fi \W U•LL WYWifJT W •O¢Wiiy~ ZW N f mUN JY LLYOOWN••LJ pf Y _N{OVU'J rrmiL2 •DDffffwN2••Y Owa_>y „~WVDNUh Y1{U Yf Uf NW_tl_W_••OD>T>ODUIp OUNOOJJJJhWS2'J JWT Yf Y~WNN~~tlr{D iS Z Z MMTIN wNwYwlI~YYYYYYYYJJJJJJJJitSSi OOOmN O~•1•Oy Lnl nlNhNNnymNbNyNryONNp00000wNPnNN.•N bNNOmwmN O<mp••m PbbyPwNPmPn•y npp ~wwOONnwnr MOPPNtlNrIOrVmh NmTNwwNNwwwwHNnNy n w w bTbryNmbr~TNN n••mmwMNN •NiNN m 8 E + VX ONTOOTONOppNNOOM1NON0000NTNONPOmTtlOppOaNtlrM1Nwn000000 ^~^ h•ONOONONOMa00PNNNp00000NOTpNOTVO000TNNNNhTO000T00 OOCT IjN PLmmOam +OO NONhtlONnN 0 w T NN p N ti n \F PI N+OwTVNNO TrONar 1 •I ~Iw r i PrNNONNONN wTO w«n NwwTaN wNTTO ON O NN nT \~ n n w w ma w T +T• w « NFr OXiIFI XO• JPOwNTaNO«OPOnNT+NtlM1ppOwNTaNrhOPO'rN TrNrM1OPOwNPaNrhpp SF ¢NOrONOmVVrpFM1hM1M1hFhhYOOmOOmmmOpPPppppPPPP000pp00000 tlrtltlarrrtlrtlrN+tlNtltlraaatlPtltlmaratlaaM1hhhhhM1wM1h ° iii iiiiii+rr+ar++aar++aaaa+aallaaaallr+aaraaaraa+aa+ p±iaal++•aalaa+•+aaaa++aa+Ir+raarrl+aa+aaar++++aaa+1 +ii F w • • . •i• • • • •• • •• p : ..N a« P Y X OI N a 1 ¢> WNO T Y LTJ 11 F + r«nl Vrn r rH« n Z>O \w O\¢ V N il• i SYii N\N W \ {1{1 2 O VO~• WII Wh W ~ m O Ni+ f«\ n V w`fi N«\1 1 ¢ rNiu \OZIY¢VL Wh WVI R\w YV J • +ZiNNp YSm 'J yN Nrr WSU JN« ` W«S wOW « h ¢ RW WwW 6he>N LL i <ef«O ) Z wJh iw iJ •YPUVI LL ¢\ V IN« O¢J FWN• Ih • Y« 1 + NPOOU«O2¢ VNWN w N < Y O W ~ Oa0 Y j HUJ Yh~IWO• ZWrWNW W i M~[00 t UVVfryYWOWM O h I <>MLWONMQO« i U2N29 « WI 6V I UPw6N U TI Li _ _ _ LL¢N¢JJ¢ « r rrrrr rr _ __ __ f, ~. ~rr~ W LLM1i\\JLLyO:Wh{ Oh wJ N L W¢NpNn ZI pOi O Su0 <O F ~= <2WY sM NW wY .Fy{Z2NW t Cu LL oYWw ¢R +O«)Op JWwPw1- •hLL ODJIW6f •W hi¢\ VN Su M + WZUZhNLLpN««rau z h>OLLWN«hWZ wh ¢hz ptlwz azwrw xu a pphw««> > z swW~LLLL¢z{ a PzN ~z Nzz«2PLL u~ LLwewwa N~wwih w~n¢zJ p«xhpwwp« ¢ ~~ « w w VM O J SySZU6 Wr¢iYNiu fr S WYh<1tp0 NVOZO¢ <2JW¢¢•WF wL60¢pLL2¢w¢LLZjCULLOOi SWWLLLMiLLWO O J LL VI tNZ OO:mVC<JI V Oy OJ y WV2 t w W S J N OO „ LL Wi•w Ju W h2 NNLL LZwS NW W 02 'J ¢NSNJ 6 {ONNVVOiWOp NpJWNUWwONLL VVLLJ {rOWZJYV>OJ 'J¢yN V n J2SUh«Vm CrOrF CSrFVV fOwV J 1 FC hWZwf-wJ«2 • -IFJJ2IU m9«Z««Z«6ZMNWHZw wi f6¢¢LLw«i)GJUWwM6«WLLSW~CN<Sn ViVLL'fwpWiZOJ OOfWWJef¢w~+3wJ«WWOW« NVUwpN¢LLiStO¢)Ci00ZYPWU2N6Z>20>IZOappU{siNLL¢p«iONhJ U « LL F S P V i F u V J V~ r US ¢ V 4w Ya.N ~ = i Z UmJ ~O si « « U eY n M 1 i N VI~J ZSZO WJV hOtl NZ ¢{ «OON V wU VJO ~ OW VO f S 11 F FN S «w MrN ><hY O «O OUY NY• ~ppLLf¢ J hN N V2 >ON>i «VNZ C OuU • 7L OW+HU fh2 W YILW ZLLM{Sh ON{Z 6+NV7VVWJLw p ¢r h WhOOWV2pJ IOK O Z iJVVM7MOM«ZCOpVwNJWFONN wp2 NJiiO «JJ i UNVZZ <~~O=Y Ny«¢mZLLW{JNV¢ NiV OOtir>OlU p00 FV 006N • b¢WONw O«Mi>:i W2JOO« ONFVNO[J O •WUV F _ '=NNNW «J2VhIWh«Wh0«OU •JM OW>uON«M6PW OiUl~ifp •O{ i WLL p P ~ MJ•<~O f¢S¢SOJ«VU W 6 hfhhNrON •V St •H pF.YO¢ < WY a¢ SW fMWwN«J)VW¢2>'1fJWZY2N D 00«V{N< •W~ pO ~fWN2¢««~LYOai LLY.W {f SLLO NSJUMWw«Yip OSSi Oiyl YNOO xYjNS r fiW««hJ«O h~f OwZZhOi YY NWWUV { Y •t• ShUU 00«¢1U0«WVYYUJ2VGNFWZZ N0~6J 7t Ci20M » >OYJii XyF Ciii iiZ2i2ii0000>G66GLL000>POGOCCPLL¢¢¢¢Yiipl[YOONNNMN F TNFPThpp wN NN+TnNONrPNTOTNrMpOTp O1rNNPOwr+OmO IIOF Pp«00NNNnp9hrlT ry~w9hmnaNryJ a.gwTyNpNTH MnItlO+NU)••NmM1O SF : « NN+NT+HTATTNPNw NrO.ITNTNr NnN^~N ~MNwtlrNNryNm~+NNT N WF > : 9 V tNm ~~N V6\ Of0 iLL0 O e^ ~E ~Z• 4^ \F \. 7• OII NEE m1 ~< i~ w w M •iI X011 ~F• 11U 11 IIN nOmOTN~NnPOwOOFnTOPONNJ VnjO ONpOOFTNOp00 FTInTONFONPOp NWNTdNnIOOTPN..Mm Tw w NIwNNFIfm PTnNNTPC NN F..TION F O JOwNTfnOFOPOwNTfNOFOPOMNmIndFOPONNTfNO offfafff II~f1If~l~Ifff111f~11ffflfffff lff~f~• Offfflf lfllffflflfflVff.I .Ilffffffflf lff tl _ y . m.mm• m f ! • mm. V N `~ m x I z z uw°w • o i pofw nT zmNw •ia o bsw tli mOO ~ Nx °o ~" I J m ~tl •i N i i~~ w NOVOI FV OW r tlVmUwiOwmfmN ~N V NO wiVZ \NFV wS .[N MI FJUJiWY00000 FVSIN 00 wJJ V Y f Z< 0000 ZNO \ hONJO i ~. OVmi ON FPNNF Fr.WJi. V N_NNU<N_ O• MN NIO _Mf \_NN i o J•W00000Nio Uf 7b^ Zw<\OV w~MmM J20 OM YLLSV W•O< y OINFN Nw• J90LLIlf JJ O\06w1{ooPOpNOP6ZtN WOOwN2WP ORNN J OYmew~wP JnWNi00 p' OJ06b JLLNwLL whYFwE< TOwwoNwwSib~NifmtlOwlU VSONw LiixN6xJ0pOwO\OFW WLLO>nl« MUiuON WiNwNN1o JZJm Y\OOYOw00 FSi Y6 <~YO N> fJWLN•f UV022wOVfJ FpmCm~ Z1-<Y> N f Of NSOILJ C W.Zii OTTwlmn YS~WOiNfeOiNtltlNN6WwtV Yiv>Zf SJw OOUNiO6uONrNNNONNOV<OOm NIL i00ajOYt<NOtCY N 0V0 O V2 -IJ JJ u S .~ JJJJJ p O Z OwNm LSSSS O .V NNNNN Jm ZN<N ~ N xS: O 4_ aW0 <f< .OOF LLFS6J~ JV ~u 1 1 I ~ i ewwN u.wic« aN a 1-0 ~z f„ IIIIIV > <_CON6YF > <i MF V_O <S2.e O''11e 100 NILLLN .[UOOJWiY.<i pUN N M Y<OP pJNNNNN<NNf NVfOWOJ •j tOaN< O Y<WV<NNNMMVJJF NJM OiUN t. NS mP NpOWi00000 •ff 1LJF.teU<i V WOW WNYWO 000 1m MwWWw VONm JUW W<\VL e< N Wwu r~~IN-JwN .wtl ~u ~ z Uitli• W4LL Il W>w J> w`t0 W N~JwwNMwJ66tl FYJN JON N WLL nIL JJJJJY_W_ JNNiWYFWVOW 02 .O SYJ2V pQ:w~OF« « JV ~K>J3W OaW]~ ) <FWWF LULLWO _____W<VUVU .~JO<O <NMJNJYtlNUJJ JY •fuuuwzeeneooooose~rl=Fia .z<N« a NNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNYY»>Yiili ifiiM TrwFFINTnTTTP~FnNd fOONIP~. Y~I d1A.T.d pPNPO wNwNNOT11111TNmTTNnNwNmPNdNdNINPwNN n T.ITNNnI ..J wNN P T N N MP N N JNTN (D CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: June 6, 1990 T0: Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director 8Y: Susan Neely, Finance Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF 1989/90 BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS RECCMMEN~ATiON Approve all 1989/90 budgetary adjustments for the General, Capital Projects and Special Reserve Funds. BACKGROUND When the budget development process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated revenues and appropriations 14 to 16 months ahead of anticipated needs. in nanP ral ochima 4nd rovnmme anA ann rn nriatinnc have hPPn ad illc}PA in reflect a more realistic level of activity in all funds. There has been no shift of estimated revenues and appropriations which digresses from the direction Council has requested of staff. Capital Improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Council items throughout the year. Attached for your review are charts showing the increase or decrease in each account area for revenues and expenditures. These increases or decreases are determined by comparing the amended figures to those originally adopted Dy the City Council in the budget. Respectfully su Dmitted, -~ ~~_~-- e m Hart Administrative Services Dfrector JH/SN/dah attachments I I ~ h: ' IQ nd:. it O - ss=° i=' i°' in ~ a ~° „ a i.: I a I I I 1 I j I ~ ~ I I j I I ~ I~ 1 ~ I~ CF Yi i• i I <C i• < I I t~~pa j a f I/1 ~ ~ ae U*< ~ < ~ I ~ ri as< of i°o ~~ i~ of Rw 1 I i t 1 ' . °u 1• ~ la I 1 I ~ 1C ~ 1~ ~ m a ;a I I I ~ 1 O 1 O I ~ O O p I a F V a s ~ ~ t ~ c i ` < = ~ ~ °o i u a r ~V I~ P 1~ ~ I I O 00 101 w ~ I~ ~ I I ~ O fi °s T i s b V $.' =~o ~ _; e ° p m a ~_ ~: oe :; ° o: a s ~W ] ~ ~ •~ ^a ~ ~o a eo ao ~ o w Q <~ 1 W U a ~ f\ C o L i p ~ Q x i ~ m N I~ --' ~. ~, I~ ~ I~ ~ I~ ' 1 fit! I r ^ ~ ~ ~ i r~ • 11 i t ~ > >e~ t ~ ~ ~ i • t • ~~ ~ ~c e a pe0 Y ~~ o + f Ih ~ f ~i f •~ C iY • u ~ I~ Ir i ^ n .. ..n nw n... ~ t0 ~ I • 1 ~ a g a C o o ee Y ~ ~Y~ ~ ~ i ~ <~ _ ~ 'i •~~-.i O~IM s t~~e Yit ~~O~V •YUY nip p~.oap~agn><~it~ O ~ 4 P~ • r f~ ~ ~i 0000 ,.n n n n~.~~~.unu~~n~n~.~ ~{ Oh ; : ^ l i M ~ ... e ~S ~4p F Ch ye i. M t• tY ~ i t n 10 Y Ui> M O O --=:e ' '- - _ _~.:' - .e5 4i as c.~. .v .i .. .. N.. ..~ F ;~ i I a 9c - , : Y ,; e ::~ : , _ . ':a. ~ - _ _ ,_ a -- _ _ ,~ .. . - - _ ~w o ~ • __ ~ R •u~Ae ~ ~• •~~~ F~ e : ~t~~~~ ~Y~YY >~Y1VY~.~.n~ ~>~j~YHnwwa~0 M 4~ ~ nn ~ ~1t!Inngnaq :.. .~. tl.. .. .. .. ..n O h G C O 4 I ~ h t O i p 18 do - - i': i S6S3S55S56 ~... = c - -. e 4 . f i •~ c i e ~ Iq c.e - - is je ie !? - ;-' - • s ~ ~ ~i • i • I • i • j ~ I le i ^ i Iw i i- ~ h f A~ V ~ F c r= ; ~Y ~ • } Oh ip s F Y ~ : ~ IF ~< t ~ V " ' C . - a '] . ~ . ~ .. ~~ ^zs -- , ~. ~. c: e :w f i io i ` - i Q I ::: T ~aa a ~' - - oa o -s=w: LL 0 . ~ ~ _ ~ o s W a~ `~ ~ ~° ~~ CIIY pF RApp10 CUCYpGA euaEl /wuslpEllrs FN0 i 1a3. NscurnOw BENIk MO Icnw /enu{ NaNO IICRYE ARBME 16'0 tlflwlR AEYEIOE Itt'D R1IMiN (OECAWE) ROCA{ YoY Afl'911F +1 ItYBAIE tl31wfR OICBNR 31. EY91R INI - tIn 1Nf-N IfM 1N1-N IMFN (I) )AYR 01-0900 1010 -- - hapxry p+ • Cn t«w« 1,lII,Iii t,fii,lif 1}1,11) I,iN,IN 171,013 ' INO ha«rty ra - Cn uirreurM N,iM IN,111 N,NI lro,ON 11,1!3 IN/ hap 7« - In +« i vwra U,NI i1,ro3 0 15,N1 (71,N7) ' IDES Svxl~nt+l iw 11,ON 51,131 N,NI f7,dN 11 ' loin iu Nl« haa«« o / 1 e e ' loss Oa+Nry ru N,m ot,1ro o 1o.lN Ot,3ro1 tlo0 A1« { 0x Ow I,11f,N1 1,}11,N1 LNf,Nf LIIS,NO IN./N ' ^IS lrm11M kCYNnaY 1« 1,515 7,500 1,711 7,300 t ' 1190 ,1a+ilron to 11)117 E!5, 111 I,iG Il,lro (ltt.iN) ' 1100 rro«rty lr+xirr 1++ 3tl,lSO 115,IN 1N,IN EN,ON I/,Nt 01-3901 1550 hrrtMU F« - Op { El«trfc H/,NI Nf.IN 1 Af.N/ Ef,11I :;dR1 tSS3 :.xcntx ix - A«I0«tl+l ANa IN,N7 I/1,050 {I,IN IN,W If,N1 01-1101 ISSf Fr«chix iw-CarrtLl nfa III,/N 111,813 11,110 III,/N N,)if 01-7101 ISSI kxtMx i« • G{I+ fl N3,17f lN,111 ro,RO ti1,N0 11.111 ~~~---•~-~-- Sub-ioiil i, 11/,34 1,3/0,1/1 i,f11,eN I,N1,111 Ni.N! ~:: ~3 ctn of Dux11D n¢BPUM uN7r eDwsiFprs PCIDAI N1BIrt AEC'0 g1IMIN BCIML AOYBUE NC'D 111611fo 01IMm IILNNI (06Q1fY) P/D / /CCi. DESCIIITIOE fISW iqA AEYI}Ad Ai OEYBAR g11Miq 069~q 11. AFY9YF INI - III1 IN-N Im 1NFN IIII-M (1) lltmw f pfniN DI-11N }}N Mlnta llcwfe 1!1,0}1 I,N}.SN m.w NO.NI (1/}.SN) DI-1101 17}0 BIrycL Uxr YN NS 10} NI (N) ' lql Ntl/1N IWNb i,N1, 170 i.N1,ON m.qS I,1N.N1 fSN.INI ' •'"" .. _, .__.... ....... iu.tu 5,110 LNI (1,711) ..____-.._- Tub-toNl .._.-___""_- 2,!1],17! ~1,011,IN ----T~-.- 9}1.511 .-_.-____ 1,511.100 .-_-_..-__ (i/t,1N) / (1) ilnw B For1tlN ) .___.r_ OIdNI 7110 Yfhtalf Oadf flow 110,IN 1q,1D1 I1,N1 11S,iN II,N1 )ISO Bnwfl Winnw Flnw A,NS 11,NI 10.111 71,110 (1) ~ 1151 Df»1 NI, frn.t 7N 3.oN i.fss 7,N/ s ~~--~~ -----' ~-- 7u6-tqd 1N,g0 mese..m tN,3}I d.•o.•x.:e -~ NI,iN ttl.HO tO,NI ~vm~.. ~~ CI!1 OF AMOp CUOMOAGt NOSEI INUStAB115 K1UIl ACNAI MBION IACIFtlE A159416'S 07IM1N IEYEUF Ill•0 1711Mt® (IBC!!tlf) 11l,p / ICtt. OESMIRINS fISCLL !FAA Atx14f It k19R EStIMTFS ORB~EI II, ^a~ Ixl - 1N1 1M1-N Im IN-N tlll-N (Il amlllmua OI-3101 1500 Mb i LwN 11 I I IN M ' 1000 Intxwt Fam1n1. 111,!11 Ill,af 111,15/ m.Nl 1111.x71 nm an m mtm.o Inw~nu N,iti Sl,lll 11,1N N,Ip I, ISI ' 1x0 Aftarw/ Itr CNrS. /a i50 l1 :N 0 ' IStO Otnlr bv.r41 %,OH %,017 1,x1 x,xl (1,11t) ' ISti Swi1 Clar Crt f111iq fw (It7 0 /t 0 0 ' astt Sr17 Uar Crt Slut/Pf iw 0 0 0 0 0 ' 1A0 LL al IYCAIOtry i fWlylnt I,a3 0 I,IfO 5.010 S.Ix ' /no sa..f t.a 1 a 1 0 0 ' x,s c.:n cunrry. s sln.e.x u1 la m m la • asu QxtplOnlt atlttf~ rrryr.. o o m sol sx • /sa 1«xiet• nxrl.l: Sl~a ul la a 1N la u:l I.tx,u. Mt.: m-s~.... x.r.w n1 o IN m :x iuo-<oe.i ~----'-- la.111 ALIq - tx,m /N,551 UIO,xq ~~ CI'Y OF A.YIOp CILAIg191 NOdE7 ,161d5IFFl1?S AcruN Ectw wIeIND IIDIfNE NreuE le'D IsrIM1N IIFY6AIE le•D unM/N (1[uruld MID / ACC?. OFSCIIFII0119 FI%N 3EIR IEV~E AT SIV911E ®i1Mim Ilt'9~9t 11. AN9AIF 1NI - Iw IN!-N INS 1N1-N INHI (3) Intx/wxnwbl OIa/00 51]0 Abtw Vd1i1V in Ltu 9.3N,l7d 1.fO,IN LiN.N] /.w w ~~+ta ' ,v,.wnwn rtoFSrq is uttu 1,N3 f,N/ 0 i.Nd (NQ ' SCSI Govt Cali S/FC. 9oMNtim 1,1N 0 0 0 0 ' 5170 lnller Co¢N In L1q - Nl11/ 6.SSO 0 D f,7N 4N1 01-390! 5311 OfV Nldhiy Ucnw Fw 1.610 E,OSt B t,w (Sq dIJ1i0 5310 C1pSrttp fia 111,/dl fU,S55 71,]If 11S,Nf I,/IS ~----- ~- Sob-Wt11 - ' ),116,H1 3,111,110 1,111,]11 I, I11.IN III,NI E) CNrdN fa wviw dl-]!01 HN Fingir hint flp 9, O3o D I,iit S,w S,ON DI-1101 1100 CwtatN F11Inp iw d 0 P i ' d1E0 Flan twv vtn N:„N 311,IN NI.IN 1,N1 ' 1}10 Fiirnliq Fw ',iI,IN 751,371 117,711 NI,NI I,NI Ind Fp9ws1n/ Fw zNlan :del.lx nl.a1 1dN,w n,w see-<aFl 7.77:,NI lAnan 1,711,111 - 7,/N.IN a,Nt W cm z Iwap aurw ewrr Iwusrrtlns /clau letlu as uaaa ssrl Ise marts ewR /r'~/ mans (np~lAl) ns i ,Imr. Ieal»Im nlw rlr w~ a Isew matte tsws ». ~ iM - 1N1 nIFM MINI i neHl 1111-M - y . (r) aMn 01-1Nt 1M1 Trwflr In l,ta,IN I,Nt,M 1 I,W,SM 1 n-tm as NK IIIM 1 1 1 al w w M of-an n:: ~-rNa alrn.ro LNe,rn rN.w ».no nlas ilu) n-ttn n:t 4wll~t /llam e.INwl~ t a,m Nt,m Il.m a,sl tt»,m) of-mt as Inan+~l n. al. trnel 1 1 n1.Nt 1 / at-Im :eN oen. elnlalny ~• Ne,ttl 1 o e 1 lue~toe.i t.ln,nt t,nt,e» sx,m t.eN,NI (eN. nt1 ~ MAl - 1aaAL 141M n.IM.ln n,iM,ill d / I,nl,m u,nl,ls (m.INI CIi3 N AMpp LLYIIgNA NDOIt NIUSiABl77 ICRMC ACIYAI NI711N IICNIIE N7l4E IBC'0 BIIMi® AtY9[ 16'1 031M701 (IINIAAI f4N/ / ACCT. OElpII1TIW fIXAt 3EM RYBIOE AI N191E ESiIMiB OBClO 71. IRYBIII INI - INI IMFN INI IN1-N IMYM Iv!ciu Nvaut IU9: a+.w~n/Cm 11-JNl SI/! AN~OUrAl~el/C1110 /I.NI 31x17 N M3 a Ax iA..~„ wo-=!~3.i -- a,nl n,ai - 71,N3 N.IIi peal73 Mi~eurulwtU41 ifN --_-__'..e•y-^lan..na ?..I !N !./!'- 2~H! ], N! (3~In) Lbtai>" ~- 7N I,IK 7,7N 7,010 (7.115) wN;.;:N!nU: iMt3 of in wnxn~m 01-1101 5111 AddurMNgCan3Y N 3,1. 13,170 701,317 0 0 tIN,7n1 01-IN7 INI UAlwfln In 131 0 0 / 0 7~e-3an u,m lu,w o 1 un,ua ~$ :m a lfealo ar:xMN1 euoeFr fwAnrnars N111AL ICNM AIBN® IeptltlE IIfE1R Mf'D ®i1M110 M1BU( AB'D 0711NiB (ORUUE) ft110 / 1CCr. OFlpIR10A] FIeW 1Fq AlYDeE fi eNaelF B1IM7® uLt!•u 71, A!Y'01E 1N1 - INI IMHI INI 111-u 111FM Bu iu 11R p0.1Np iU0 iw iq 1IAi NI,NI N7.171 N1,11/ flf.Nl @,f3/ O1-NN INO IMInN Nm1np1 1,7N N,111 1 t1,N1 SN Of-1111 INI irwffM In If 1,{N 11,117 1 1 114,11]) N-1111 SI51 /N iq 7111.5 0 1 1 1 1 a-uq w, .._w. ,_ .,..,. 9uNNd 1, 111,7N M7, 111 /N.ir/ NI,Ne (1,11)) Oq u. 1101. 4101.5 114101 1100 In[ftwt Ircow N.IU 11,74! 1/,1N u,ON (11,775) 1101 Liq Inpo~ 1 I,N4 1,041 1.1N Q.M7) 5110 klb w iq - 7106 1/5,N1 1R,4N 111,111 N1.1N (Q slsa k.N w rq -:IRS 1,N1 lo,o/o ID,eN 11,oN o II-1101 1111 In L1~ F1q 711 0 0 1 0 II-7N! ful irlmlr In 14.19 17,111 0 0 (77,111) ---- - --- --- - - BukaNl &d :ii isT ul msN /1im n7,is1) s19s/rM /lr.l 1i-flu IIN 4Kfrgt FxniM N7,111 11,175 71,7N u,111 1,N5 It-0fN SR9 DN NIN h1 I,u/,i11 I,IR,I{I 1 t,1u,IN N,ul R-N17 NN irgdln In 7,111 1.1N 0 1 O,7N) 1E-11H N77 INn-WM MIMw1NgN 1 0 0 1 1 1.115.711 1,117,)N 9,1N I,u/,IN N.iM ~q Cftt OF RKGp CULWIfl1 DDO65i nOJUSfxdi9 KN4 KNK 11610FD INOIFAOF AIY0111 DK'0 ptIMRO IIYfiIX A6'0 ptlMip 10[G1FLR) WDD / KCT. pEKAlITIdS OIY4. YEU AEYB4S 01 MY9JE piiMlm DKERA 11. AEYUAE 1w1 • Iwl iMFN Iwl Iw/-w 1111-M wa«<sm sm.;ur I)Jwl 1110 IserMHan Sr. 111,}11 9w,ISC 111.N} UI,/w D I]-)NY 1101 Gmstmr In 915 D 0 1 1 sue<«a w},m nL1u nl.w: »s.Iw a se IDo !s-Iwo Iloo mx.rnt lawl Llu o a] Iw Iw rsalol sus s.cna a91 s a x us«.t9a D D o e o uawl lam o-m.ral In o 0 1 0 0 Subta~l 1,111 a Iw 111 /H PNxM1m Grmq/trtlNl 1 11-1w0 9110 /~IntHmRIeMl SfOwAlb 11,511 0 0 0 0 II-0501 1{00 Intwwt E1rn9np1 0 0 0 0 1 IM1N} IOOt 7rAatxr In 0 0 0 0 0 fuhtOtA) /e,fll 0 0 0 1 30 CITY ai IIIOp CUUIp111 fU1Ni AVmllat] (CIVIL IC1YIl dB IVLiYF IM'!1[ /KY NIIMIN !1!M[ 6'1 Oip11i9 (Imwll fV1D / ACti. pS1I1II0» tI/Nt TNI MYB4E OT MYA[ BIIMi» R!B 11, 1lYp111 11M - INI (III-M ~ IMI INFp IM/-N iN 76.71! If-0111 t/N /tYrtl lrtnb N,Ip t 1 1 1 N7/ OtM IYldtntttww p,111 1 1 1 1 fultobl N,1N 1 1 / 1 1rtIM1t iw111ttw/EtMMt 117-]pi 1111 km ktin itw I1111] »7,N1 1 III,lN (NI,7rq 11-]p7 fpl 4wfw In flf N7 1 p,Nl /l,lp m~twT- nzpl VITA 1 m.eN aN,f») 1trF Otnlaptnt 10-]pl INI Intwwt Frolgt III,TII 7N,ifi 217.1» m,N1 Ip i/N M Nn1alMit ttr 7,iN,M1 I,fri,Nl iN,pl 1,lp.IN (»,IN) iffi irn Y1rtt M pwlatwt 1 1 0 0 0 11N A 0 Yllit tav Lint Agra 1 1 1 0 1 :fx !ra 103 !0-0IR N11 lrtafw in 1 1 1 / 1 fubmGl 1,Ip,p1 7.111.»7 - Mt,N7 t,Ip,M1 (N.»t) 31 CIA Oi O171CIp CUCNMIpI tUD31i AONSiIB113 ACEl4l ACNAI A6oFD IIICIMd1E At3BllE Att'D f311MTN INO1K IB'0 fS11M1N (DFgRASF) FlAIO / ALCi. NSCAInIOM FISCM 1IM AJYBpI Al MYBAIF FS1IM1® OBE~9 Ii, At7BN[ Iw - 11N INF11 1N1 INf~N 1NFN /mMillutlm ti•111I 1100 IMMyt fiminr 5,111 0 / 1 D 11Jt0i 1111 DlvllalrY hrtlKptlm n,fN 1 /I,NI 1 0 71-3N1 i1N ImuH/tutim iw 1,N/.151 LISt,IN 7N,IO SN.NI (157,IN) >1_tm1 nu I. it.. 4.. • tt ^• 11-1N1 iiti CmtMlMim /n Nd 0 1 A MS./50 NS,/SIB 71-7901 I1N lw rplpw,t 1 f7,IH 0 N,w (I7,N1) 71-1133 1001 irwfw In I,1N 5,777 D 0 (3,111) SiMMS LSN,Ni 1,NI,NO ' -- !11,111 IN,ISO (NS,IN) syttw Oa.lm.me 174N1 INI IMKwt EKn1np~ 13,111 }1,117 IN.NI 1N,N0 iN,371 1{01 llm intro !!7 S, 131 7,113 0 (S, ISI) 1q0 77ttw iw 1,IIIdN t, 131,111 II1,N1 7.ON,100 {NI,IO) 1110 AlunrKL f71tw iw 1 0 1 0 0 iKl Orvllwr'1 hrtlaKim 0 0 0 0 0 1117 NL K lm/ p 0 0 0 1 ius emtr3attmiiMw p n:,coo 0 0 (n7,IN) !r. :3m Fro 17,73E 0 0 d 1111 In L1wi i1mBYrihorolph (31/,1131 0 0 1 0 nu Cmm3Wnm m ud 1 o e uLIN nl.m 77-0Nt 1001 hw}vt In 1,SN IO,NI 0 I11,iN !11,171 7ulta~i---~yJ---~ -~ j,N7,f11 1,7N,Nf ~ IP1,113 7,lf0,SN ~ (111,111) 31 cm of ullalo a1t311aw euNtl AolusnltRr Knot K71N1 AABIND IIICAFNF Nrelll Itro tsruwm NIeRk lec•p erIMRO (oelctx) Xtro f Kcr. Nxllnias 3tlSLL 1FY NYeNF a IkY6UF FJi33M3N ooceAN 11. kYeA[ INI - 11M 1M}N 1N/ 1N4N IIII-M RNKN YK111f1MNwrJ Hry i}101 1110 Oeln Ntln fw f,N1,111 1,3N,N1 NI,NI SN,NI ;IN.Nq i3-3pl 7111 OMiwr'1 IlrtlciNtlm 0 0 p b 0 i3-7101 1100 Intxrt ixniM f,}N fp 31,111 31,N1 N,MI 71-H01 1115 Cmtrl YuHm frr. RN / LIp,NI 1 I,IIf,N/ 771,N1 13-1111 1001 1rKdwr 1n ],Ia 1 0 1 1 SYOtoal 1,131,11/ 1,IN.1/1 311,311 1.1/7.N1 Iu1,Nq YlNrll Aid O.Mn 3/dN0 {110 fyKll X19hKy &KH (11,111) ip.NO 0 I71,N0 (/7,/M) ^p1 kch10110 AvOwc (Cpp) Ii,iN 0 0 0 0 1111 pthK Mkurxwb (1,111) 0 0 0 B i1g9p 9001 rrrafKl In 0 0 0 p 0 9uKK11 0 N1,Op 0 111.101 ----_ (l1,IN1 R. 1'BCry &Kt !14191 Itryf If.u n 1' :N SI,SN 11-1900 Oid iam /Kh 7 0 0 II1,N1 I/I,Np slNunl o wa..w.® a ® e .. . In./w ua,lp a.9n - p31a . . .....~ .. ......w.. i1=1nI"em toll Rn.Nrl~n /s3,113 us,aaa o a./N a N•7101 INI /ru1rN inew I,HS 1 0 1 1 7ukxtl /N,111 177,N0 0 111,N1 1 33 CIiY Of RllCtp NCAIIMM NO6Ef ANIAii1B11y ILR'Al ACNAy AIBpEO INCAE~iE kV9AR Afi'0 OfiMRO MA'fil[ ~'0 BfIMiO (OBOIIY[) PAO / ACCT. OFYIIRIa6 gIOCAI ItM M'IBAR Ai Ab'BAIF F31IMiN OR9~G 11, M1'9AIF 1N1 - IN1 1111-N 1N1 iNFN 1Nf-N IArk lord Bran - iN1 it-1101 SITS /.rh bM OrIM/INI 0 7ff,tN B 3N.tN 0 9uAtot.l ----- ---- 0 NI.i51 0 1N.t71 0 Xbtrolnl &Ant 31-1101 5110 NUtrclui bunt gLOhrllNnb 0 0 0 0 0 Sukuul a a o - i o vxh ema Act - INe 31-1701 Slly ~ vArk lotl @AM / IN6 a 11;IN o y1,gN q SubroGl 0 N,ON 0 SOON '~ 0 3~ '~, cIn a INgq w.nw Noah Aoxerlexrs A[IIIAI ICRMI MlMN IIINAtE NYEII[ IB'a FIfIMIN lliF 6'1 NfIN1p I/6NAR) PAII / Axi. NlQIttIN! Ingl YfM NtBfE AI AtYpll! 6IIMTN 16AB 11, 1lIB~f ]MI - IMI IIII-M INI IIIFN 1MFM Irnm 1 - hwlatNta Aw~ul v-1/N Mun 1 Irvlrw 1 0 1 n.IN n.1N Sukx~1 a 1 ---- 1 n,IN n,IM N f1a Gvt v-]NO N IIO Gwit Inca 1 0 1 na,M ]/1,Na - memta- o a i m.IN m,/x 'C7k •T.::K X:4S nY..: I:,iadN 8,ila,/i: i,Ri, iri fi,Ri,iN IL:N,iNI 35 cm a IJlglO atAll0lpA euou'r ANUS17kr75 Actuu Ac1uAE xewEO 71u9J.3E ItrnllE Is~o anr1E9 9e~o mlriEe tueawEl MO / ACCt. 9ESCIII71U15 3I3GLL tfAA REY9kE Ai AE1911E EItIM)EI OBC~kt 11, AEY9YF I1N - 1H1 I1H-M NH J913.M 191FM WI7Al WIOlEC1 MOS GI1t11 faexw Jo-Dw auu JntxYt urnnpl 911,11] 3A,b1 9ri.311 3A.M 111,131) Is)9 ai.r a.J.v,. 0 0 0 o e an lox Aprwwnc vruwdl o e 9 0 0 191 Ahlnlrtrttlw ix] 0 0 9 0 O 73-1997 9001 trx9fxl In 0 111,110 0 HL1H 0 Subtxli~~-""~-~---- --911,713 1, R9.ISi IH,111 1,119,HA (16,111} Gntr11 NrF kcpdMtlx 71-7541 1609 ~---InMSt Elmtip9 7,117 9 9 0 1 1910 Caq 1rx11/1 111.113 9 0 0 9 H:9 aA1r 4r.w1 0 0 o a o - wetltd u7.9a o a 0 0 bInIH.3t caw rA99 M9 Ir1H1 tloo eaa xx+1e 3,ns,aa a o 0 9 11-INI /IN (newt In1a H,131 II.IN e 1 (II,INI snii«1T"~"' "_ a`.liiaii u.llE ~ e ._"".....- a tu.EEE 3c~ cin a a1NN tutwa11.1 aNtr Aaesnms Atruu AcrDAt xeeN Ieargl AE1'BUE IS'0 tlPIMiN IeVBAIE NC'e ®TIMiN (NpM7F) ftAq / Atli. NYAIIiIUp fI1Nl 7FM IE16UE /T AIYBI'F OPIMiB OfG9~911, 11'RR INI - INI INFN INI 111-M IIIFM AD N-E EnNndlMi0eleN aD 15-1NI /IN Intlrwt um1nN t,iN 0 111 IM IN iflo as er:.w e 1 1 1 I me anw' e~.we (s,Nq D (N) e 1 is-]N7 fN1 nw,a.. m e 1 1 e 1 Auull (],fs]) 1 III IN IN N u4 A1G tm tlnmei IF1101 /NO Intwt famtep 13,171 11,111 1,717 11,110 t ifel seta /n«e.ae e o a o e es:e aelr nt.n. 0 0 1 0 0 s/-1N7 1N1 nmfr. m N.ls1 o e o 1 ~ tuNMd 111,111 if,/N 1,711 I1,fN 7 ID I1-I Nx SMre ]edevelJ Ndf1i /IIO IMw,a ExninN 71,111 11.7{1 I/,IN 77,111 t NaNt /N, r.IMlw m D e 1 e o a~eiltli '- -'-i{,f1i n,nl usa n,m t 37 CILV OF IIWCIp CUGI~MJ aoen /austl9Ts 1BNLL IOfUAL 1190® IIICIE.R 1lYEI[ A6'0 g7UM19 InE4F ew'D BtIMI® 1169tlF1 RIIO / Ktf. 017CItIXTiOw f1YAS 191 111911E /i AwMI[ HtIM19 OBCB~EI 11, AIY911E Im - Iwl IIIFN twl INI~w 1111-11 w a-1 /Ir c~ n-7m uw mcxa sminp o1,ln msss nl,In Insle s n-ml ute aX1. ~ 1 1 e o 1 IFlffi foal hlniln In S 0 1 I n SWlabl 111,111 - IOS,SSS nl,111 m.nl -5 w w es xrrtpl 11-3901 1600 Intxnt Gminw 1I,tli 11,015 /,m I{,010 S f1-3901 1100 eoe et«ne1 C 0 0 0 0 n-m: 9001 nnaal m o 0 0 0 0 S10mtd Il,itl Ie,OeS 1,7n 11,110 6 n19nIb0Xill 11-0101 i1i0 intlewe F4»Inp 77,Ow 11,3!1 S,tw n.nl t IM1f01 IfeO letl 0 rl P ! iFiiu ne, il'111i9n in i11,Iw 1 0 1 0 5e0tn11 llf.lw 11,571 S,tN lLSH t 3$ +z° CITY Df RNCq ftCMOR1 wwlf WOIIBIPo ACNK AC(IIl ~w O7W11 Ins7e ^C•1 maw/s tlld! B•1 minnw 1wt71wq tuo i lar. 7aat(mm nlca rut w1a1e Ir ant merits os n. cowl 1w1- llw lwl-w -...•tr 111Fw 1wF11 w IF! M wUrP amla n-mt Ini (M1Nrt frninp Y,/R IM.W 1,7w IM.1M (71 w-7w1 rwl Iwll~wr 1 7,Iw,Iw 1 7,w1.w 1 w-mt ww (Mle tMU. 1 1 1 1 1 n-m7 wol r'../.. m 1 0 1 1 1 Il.m :,cw.m I,m :,Iw,lw al 1 x~. i/TAl CAl1r/l IADlltf flAlw I,wt.wl 1.711,/N 7N,m I,Iw,711 (w,tN) 3q Clrt OF OllOp CUCOq& eUOBEi ODIUSigItS OCIUIL ACIWLL AIB9E0 IMOAWF IlIEA[ 11S'e 0TIM1B 0lY9IIIE IIR'0 0TON1eD (OBALYq fUI10 / Otti. 09PIITIpl1 fi0tll 1H1 AH90F O1 AHBYE B1IMIED 06E~911, kYBAE INI - IHI IMI-fl IMf 1M1-N iMFN OBfOCT MOS uuouwrt Cmtni OtrM At/~ptim 1Wf01 1100 lnttt~t 4miigr S 5,}11 1 S./H S1 ' ISO hifwry Cott (IH,}H) 0 0 0 0 ' IS}! L1tH OtS~mt IM.IH 0 0 0 0 If-191} 9001 trtroftw In 0 L}If,110 0 I,}H,110 0 ------"-~- - Y ~- Submttl },H7 1,HS,iH 0 1,}15,}10 31 Gnhal OmM Rtwrw 19-1141 ileO~~~ Inmrst Etrninyt 11,151 SI,HI 9 11,000 (ef,IH) H-af: fael rttw5tn m m,aH o f e o 1Wteul ^_••__-- - IA,ISI _~- S1,IH -- e _ ILOH - ~'PL"HU Mtitla imd - WtA btt 0mM N-7Bt N01 41Hltn inln 15,111 /1},tll 0 110.110 0 11JNi IIH Inttrrt Incs (H,110) II,HI 0 II,HI (11) fu4teH1 711 -~IH,011 --- - 1 /H,111 (It) 0 CIiY OF AAlglp LUCAl105A ACNAL ACOO/l AIMim IICMAIF IOFYBIIE AB'0 9r0117N IItY6AlE 1[C'0 BTIMON lota11,e11 {NO / ACCT. OEOCllllrlpl fn[K nAl MY9l[ At MN1AR HfIMiN OR6~F1 Ii, IEYMYO INI - Iwl 1NH1 INI IM/-f1 INFN htnrvn land - Xp-th Fwt /ri {1-)111 N01 7tIMw1/n lN,SM 0 I 1 0 {{-3101 1100 Intxwt las i, 1N 11,151 0 11,N0 1U -- 9ubKanl T---- m.110 11.N1 0 11,N0 15) Gtivuy Cat fad - Nn•M Fpt 1wh i1d111 1001 Glafln In N,{11 p 0 0 1 N-1101 1100 Intxwt into. (70,111) 0 0 0 0 5io-taJ I/1 i -- 0 1 ~--~ 1 A011-1 Rrd~ltfa nm/1 11:a Orwrtr r,n - cn Swrrw o p nr.Nr n1,N1 u1.No naN1 nN nnwrer rn - rn Ae,t.d / 0 0 0 1 n•no1 ale fntltrt fnrninpn o 0 o d e u-1NI o01 lntrwt - brtr MNINtn o o p 1 5 n-1111 iN5 klaiwt - arv MlMltiw o 0 0 0 1 11-IIN fNl Inwhn In / 1 0 1 1 1 Sukw11 ~----~• j -- - p - -101,111 IN,NI 111,N1 clrr a wnlo acAlaNA BUOBEi ANUSanrs YLRSLL AC1YK xNS® fOtWIE ANSIN NC'D 9TIMiEO CYEM[ B'D HipMIFO (0[WR) iW / ACCT. 06LA1i11011 iI1Gl 1MA AIY9111 AT IIYBAR FJIIMIB 06AR It, kYBY[ NM •INI IN4M IMI NII-N 111FM AO N•1 Awrw 11-7101 INI Intwlt Ew1nN 0 1 1 0 1 1101 Illlrw IINtrNmn 1 0 1 1 1 11-Itl] INI Irwtw In 0 0 1 Y I SuNalt 0 0 0 0 1 AO 1{-I EleNl imrtrlt Nrriln9l if-fMI 1{00 lacrtiM.nmt Nm1p1 0 0 o e o n•NU Not nlNlw to 1 a a 1 a Submtil 0 0 1 0 1 N N-1 II/stlm 11.9911 i0t1 iropmq ia-Cp lttvM 111,{!/ 111,1N 17, {!{ IN,NI (1N) INI bltY f InttnN 111 1,115 111 I,NI (111) INI Intlnlt Fmnlnp II,NI 1,171 1,111 f,IN (1,111) INI IMmNt - Em1v NlM/tlm I,NS 0 I 1 1 iN1 MiMINI • Gr1y N/N/tlm N,NI 0 1 0 1 II•]1N MII irmYlw 1n 0.l10 0 0 1 1 sAew1 _-~• • ~--- NLOM _ tH,M1 ~ ~7.Iq 710,N1 (LN/) ~4 CIiY OF RANLXO OIGIIyIBA euoasl Awuslllun ACiVAI Niue Cy91E AB'0 RfIM110 Ifl9AlE AN'/ iNW / NCi. OfSGInTIOp fiSCAt 1NA IEY91E A7 OLCBp 11, I1w - 1N/ I1w-M iw/ N N-1 Mw /IBI1S0 IANEAY 9TIMTw (ONl7/dE) AtyB14 wfiMi{/ Afy61R 1MM IIOFN 11-]tel N/e m<wt frnlnN n.u{ u.ue La: u,tw 1 rwl 11N.rw rwlrwnu / 0 1 a 1 uatu wel rr~.f« m u,we e e s e bkWl pill IL{t/ 1.1{7 f1,iN 0 w 11-1 mmt.nt urn Isifoi --ilo/--inima um+nN twA o a o 0 IS-1N1 1001 irwfrn In 0 0 1 0 0 .--_._-_-w-_-__ skxa -.---------_"-_ -- r.au __-__"-- o ' --- a o e AO N-I NONltlan 11-0901 1060 Inrlty S Intwrt 1,111 0 I,tlS I,NI 1,N0 w-]w1 1010 Irar/!y Ow - Cp 1ruiM I,ON,Slf Lwi,iff Of,N] I,/11,N1 1 1NO vnorw<y is - rp SaorN n.ln atut 1,IO1 N,no ' 1 aeo mtxwt Nrnln{r ]s,wl u/.a] n,w ]u.N{ t Ifni mtrwt - 1f.ty r!{tlwP!~ nos nlz+Nt - s.yty oN.Klen o 0 o e o 1w1 centrluNa GpINt - IN (fu,nll Lnl,o{e (at,uT) l,lx.lw 1 i1w /npH-SNtbl tMrr f,IN 0 0 1 0 1511 LOM frw AN 0 7 0 1 1 nam twl iraaernr m 1,nlau o m,N1 e 1 swtx.t I,NO,ON ...e....® :.u{slo -- ®..r , iu,as e..e.~ ]sw,1n I,IN ~3 c1tt a IxMO nltAlokl tVINi INUSTIBIis k111/l KNk AIBIDFI IIC6gF AfiY811E 16'0 Rlllxix xrxlx IB'/ Ri1Mlx (IIIIxNE) iM/ / ACtI. SEY]I/7IOx r1Yk llx kx113E ]i NrB4t RLIM7E0 l6x~x 1f, A]rBx[ 1x1 - 1x1 INFx IYH If1f-x INI-N N ro x Ilxgt+q x-)xl ION /yu11rtY lu - C// SIIgN x1,111 I,NS,il1 /N,NS I.NS,ifo ] 1N1 Irgrty Iq - yp Slxra N.NI N,/x 11,351 N,NO s IIq Intuxt 4rn+nP 1 1,N! 1 7.N1 (1) 1111 Intxxt - Fr1Y blgtim 1 / / 1 ixs yMn[ixl • 4r1Y bMgtlm 1 a o 0 a 1010 Pgala ] Intwt I,lii 5,x1 1,SN 1.N1 (I,xq 9t-1111 1111 fewan In 1 1 0 0 0 SWtau1 --'T--~~~ - - 1f7./f0 I,xi,7U Ifl,lE1 ----1,011,370 (I,fti) N ro I] Axxw ] Ii-0xi /100 --- Intxxt Fxnlnp 11,/11 35,]1{ t3, 111 15,3N / 1 nll Iqua Ixulrgxa o 0 0 0 0 n-Nti xm Ifgt}q. m o o ] e o svlatll 17,11{ ]5,11{ 33, I1f ss,3x 1 ~~ uol{i ]o;usmlrs ACNAL OCNY MBIgD INNIFI{E erect te~o anrm erect te~o mIM1E0 t{eeanl ntat / ucr. uN:llmaH tlsw ctrl event N eretl{ m)1Niq leas w, ttreu IW - INI ItIFq INI Iq/il flq-N N N-I bun 1E--]10101 1!10 Intuat FNninlt 11[.11/ i1,OH 0 f1,1q I 91-31N q01 Irarfar in q/.eM 1 1 1 0 eubtu+,l 1iS,g1 i1.IH 0 10,iM 1 AO ]!-i0 Nvaptlm I]•]H] 1070 prop~ly iu - C/Y Sr0un/ 1]I,ON iN,tf] NLt]S }t1,ti1 (]) ' 1010 6Wruty fa - rp 9tulw OS, iSI SO,Ht t],ti! q,ql IA 1[00 Intuat F~rninp N,IS7 It, 011 tt,l1S /{,NB t Nol Intrnrt - wlv AM.H+oI IN a Ht o ' a 1 iNS rrirolNl - Fu1y ANrOt1m LNI 0 ]atl 0 0 No Nl. A taw 1 1 o e a H-]9N tool rra.fin m e o 1 e o n-]wl low ra.nr t mtrrat ],H] a lac lalo gala ~~x:::! - --- su.iti IN,;11 I:t,N7 ;c,/~, :a:; ~~ [Irr ns unn nrYrol IVOBEr 10}OS11BIr3 A011M3 AO1VLL M6ilI eR1S11E RIE1f IB'e mmrm 1eYen116'0 IniIM16 (16R/II) r>wo) Yar. owam3m Haul rw Il191t Ir IItYBY! mnuumm IBm9 ll, 11YiF 1M1 - I1M 1111-N iM1 11M11 IMFN b »-IA IYHrv1 Md»t IfM Intrwt Ew1n11 17.1{1 G,W »,l» »,IN 1 Twl 1wlm 11Hir~p 1 1 1 1 0 u-»17 NII rrwfw In o 1 1 1 0 ---- wnconi A, 111 f1,N1 31,131 SI.I11 1 /0 If-} AWlptim q-3101 IOIO VopM'tY r1~ - C/Y SINI11 I».15T lI1.1H IM,»I 711,3» (7) 1010 Irnllr[Y 7a - 1/Y 11aIIrN I,/» 1}.»I Il,fp 17,{N (I) /i» 3Mwt Fwin{I 1,»I IS,it} l.Ifl Il,ll/ (3) ~ /{» IntwR - Ir1Y •Ilwelm I,»! I,IM 115 LIM 7 i»5 Wlnnigl - fnr1Y AIfAt1m }O,i17 71,I/S 1,151 A,111 S IOiO /rwlq{Intwrt 1,}11 0 3.113 1,IN 3,iM ~ 1»} ANH/tlen horlnlnt 1 / 1 / e »-}»} fool rrnnl}w m a o 1 1 3 ~ lu1mt11 a1,1n In,111 in,m NI,SII 1,1» IO »-} Rwr.. i1-34^+ 14gn !^!zn! Sr..!~ 7,OIi i,lii i,ai i,lii i,ief 1»I AMYVI AgilnNr111 1 1 1 7 0 n-}»: »01 rr.nrw m o 1 a e 1 1ubeM~1 -'-~ 1,111 I,W -~-- I, N! I,IN 1.IM 70TA1 71BRY NM : i,11T,i/1 },117,i» I.N1,11! }, III,»I »,m f`p C;iY OF R/IICI10 C6N9101 0006Fi ,1W1631FX13 ilMO / Attl. OESCII/iIOM sNC3u ~tuESSOn nMN .....»M..m..m..m t11kINN Nine 11 AMxr11 AC1UOl OC1UN MBOED IICINdf N1611F 16.0 ESi1M1N IEYBNE A6'D 911Mitc (06Mftt) iISOLL YE00 MY9AF 07 NYEINE FS17MR0 06~Nt 71. Nf911F INI - 11H INMM INf INH1 IfN-11 /0-11N 1030 ha/xty fa -Cry SlevtN IN,l10 }N,O3 N.NI iN,IN 0 1010 ho0lrry is -In ONUnO LfN LN} 3 NI 1 q0 Ht !{00 Intwrt Ellninpl 71,055 IS,/St IO,3N IS,IfO (I) /0-]957 N01 itmfln In 0 D 0 0 0 10-3901 1010 1p11tY i In[tret I,7N I, ]IS 111 511 (105) WOtoGI 107, IS7 113,011 t00,SM 715.N0 (101) llnONtN pint ix Y1ctaM 11-IfOf 1010 hpxry fa - Cn SNUnd 313.111 635,111 357.11] N5, 111 0 INO Iroplrry lu -In 71nxv! 1,N1 qIN S,IN 1, ill 0 1300 Intlrat E.ImUgl SI,O,y 73,7N }1,11{ 70.000 1,iN 1060 ra11tY i Intlrat 110 1,131 1.7N I, NO (71) /I-3191 9001 irwaf~rl In 31,131 0 0 0 0 SoNOUI 315.370 191.111 111,331 10,770 7.111 .v ............ ............... ...A..®... a®®.m o.~mt~.or trkalM Mlnt N MYSm1 /h]f01 1070 hogrtY br - Cn SNVrtl x,131 }, 111 SS, 111 f6,ON Si.li/ INO IwpNry is - In OIar10 0 711 SN SII tlf /IN IMwrt EImInN 7N /l x,111 7.171 7,711 INI bwlry i IM1rrt 0 71 100 IN i/ I:afu fool nalrw.IO o 0 0 o e SrNxll 1,/7f 7,311 SI,Iff N,1N If,IN 1~ cin a ]halo acNe1N rmxr Iwnnlan PJ10 / .YSr. OEtalIRlOn ICIVr KnILL IIBRO Ie0A51R avers rc•v EIIMiN tier[ s•1 orlMl® c06ln[) nlra rra IEiIAR ]7 IYBIS nfeMl® ICerel ll, IkYBrE INI - IMI 11ni1 IMI IIII-11 11n-11 tN]cnpn Ulnt N Tm WM] IJ-)N1 JOtO ITOIN'[Y Tu - Cn ].wr INI hvgrty fu - In ]]nuwl INO IMwwt I~m1M INO IMlty 1 Infest N-1nt NN 4sf]n In iH,tl1 N1,71S H{,SN 111,771 S L/11 I,NI 1,110 1.171 Ifi IL U] 11 ltJ 11 NI w w 7N 711 111 NI • 7N a o o a o Suaail 371,IN 3n.Nl 111,N1 717.N1 3.IM uk]ww wa[ n IM ra u-7111 IN/ r.nv..ay rw - cn 7NUn1 LNI /,NI 3, NS /,Np e Ia0 na]N<y Tu - /n ].N1n/ 0 NI / ISI 01 7 INO IMNwt Nwinw 1.N1 In 7N W 7 1011 M1ry L Intones[ 0 ]t o 1p 1 N-0111 1001 YnwfNr In 0 0 1 0 ] ~ - - SuE[wl -~- ~ I, M]M] - -- 1,070 7.tfl I,/n -~- it :YM.:]w flint N :ww La a-nN Iv71 wlwar rN - cn slwna u,lN n7,l/s n,wl nJ,IN tsl 1010 ryvrN[r rN-rn ]NwM 1,n: a I,N3 I,ISI IsN 1{N snewa dnnlryl I1,IIS IONS 1.N1 N.Iw 1 1010 /lnllry ] In[Nwt IN 711 IN 1N h7 IYNIf NII ilNl}NI In 0 0 0 1 0 IN,lN IN.tn tOI,ON 1N,111 i,i17 n..m. .dmu.... .............. .wnn~to® ...®rr ~~ CITY a< IANCy10 CUCIFOIDI /006EI IausIFEXIs ACtuu Aqua IXefaco iFtIFASE AEY9NF A6M tl11M3FD AOYBIR IB'0 BIIMIFO (OBMAtEI fOM / ACCT. OEOCIII/LI015 f10CAl YE4 1EYBNE Al EYWF tl1IMOE0 OBB~EO 31. AFY91R Ipl - 1N1 191FH 1111 iMFN 11N-10 txd hint IM Mtm /1-flpi 1000 DrMxtY to - Cn SanW 76,311 115.000 101 103,000 0 Iao I.M.rev ilx - vn 91euM o a D b o 1{00 Intxxt 4rn1Mf IN 3.Nf 3i 7.M0 3 1010 Imlry 1 Intmx 0 0 0 0 0 16-3111 1001 Umim In 0 0 0 ^ ^ wOtx11~-----~~-- - - 11.310 ~---- 111,18 -~-------pl II1, 130 -_---~~ U^0 Nlnt Ost 11 FOIE: Fdl fUID IX DIOCAI YFAII 1110-1I! 11-3901 101C 9n^p~rty lu - Cn $rtYrM 0 0 0 0 0 m/s Dmpxtr n. - Dn ImirF o a b D o 1060 holey A Intxxt 0 0 0 0 0 000 Inexx[ 4miM1 0 0 0 0 0 0-1111 9001 irmfxt In 0 0 0 0 0 wetoul o - - -o a v b lMF 41nt O.t 11 M07[: NOM PMI IN Iwo-111 Is-:!-. D:x::v'.: "sDwfw o 1 D o / 3333 vmm~ty iN - cr sFmMe o o a o 1 mw Dfnatr A mtxxt o 0 o a o 1600 Intxat 4mIMt 0 0 0 0 B 0-1911 IC01 hxdxl In 0 0 0 0 0 wbMpi 0 0 0 0 0 ~9 CIiY a' A41~10 CYCYJMN NNE7 Ag1Y911M118 At1VM N7gAl gBgm IlctMN thBN MC'/ 011MIN II'.Y9![ AB'! HfIMlN (00.YAN) FIA11 / NS1, 0Op11rfI0M FI/LLL YGI ItVBUE Ai MY61k 671M7N IN7rNl 1l, MY6tlF IMI - 1m 1NFN INI IN/-!1 1NFN l1NHiM %N II ArcrrNl ssaNl nn rmlrtr is-cn l.nwd la,m u1sN N.tN u1,N/ 1 IN/ h*/lner sa-rn Same t,en Lm I,JU JaN pnl 1101 Intxwt frnMN !,m 7.tt1 9,171 /,m 111 INe 1wltYl lntr.rt Jn JIJ m m (n) ss-m: ml rr.+ew. In o a a o 0 Svkattl - IIt,NJ --sN.NI T a.m lustl ~-~(ilj s+gMmq !nt n n.sa.nl.t seaNl w7e Fragrty iu-Cn SMm.e 71, R/ Ii/,Nl IP.113 11f.m (s!I) Iola Irowty iu-/n BawM I,N7 7.m Lstl t,wo (Lms AI% intrrwt FwrAnq. Ills/ J, Ni I,Nt S,N/ 1,553 +ote Nnsq 1 mtrnMt m m sn Iw m ~ sl-1m Jtm n«+ran m 1 0 ! / o I --_-.._ suNwl N,N1 ' .- --'tt/;ws ._.~----_ - N.nt --_.__-.- -- vl,tw --....._-- m clgMlnp %a N VletaL SI-7Nt Ilt/ FnMnY fq-Cn SrwrM 11,711 Nell 11,079 N,m (1/) INI IrMrty ht-/n luvnl S% 5,111 1% 1,000 (1,/lq /IN int0rrt Faminp. f,N1 1.100 L71/ 1,7N (1N) IOtO Pplry t Inpnrt N ilt 117 t!a ISf71 s1-%% Nol lrwfa In o a t / o lMxd: N,N7 I%,/1! N.Ni IN.NI (3, 1/t) So Cln OS AMCMO COON9Da NO6Di ID7DSiRIRS ICIDDL /LI00. AA911N IItA1ND N1BAAi A6'D t5i1MiN Af1841 IB'D BtIM7N (IBIFtl[) R1W / /tti. aFYAlttigl5 fllal 1FN k1E14 AI AlY61R Bi1MIN OD09~f1111, lY9R IIY - IM I1N-M IMI IIN-N iNFN LsIMLp DLt N itrq Ytm SI-0t01 1070 DrtgxtY lu - C/Y SavM N,117 Ii,/N x,111 11,fN (1N1 Ia0 fM01rtY lu -try 51aeM 111 In 171 IN N 1600 Intuwt Flminp i,/M 5,1H 1,111 I,NI NI lam v.~.lry 1 mtwe n a w n/ N ar>nx rvei rtm.nrx m 0 1 0 0 1 wlrota II,1D1 IS,1f1 57.17! N,OfI N L17AtiM DIR t5 Gryn Ca 51-1101 1010 OrooutY 4x - Ch 9sertl 1{,111 17,115 11,717 17 111 s r 1010 harry lu - 1/Y SIaM 111 IN 15! , 150 !k 1600 intuwe amlMl 7,fN t,ili I,BI 1,U0 (f) IDW hxlry i Intwt 75 a N IN N 1 Sf-3117 1001 irmhn In 0 0 0 1 1 SuDe'ogi -~------ -11, 17i- ~ 71,tN 11,7!1 15,a0 711 ~• LIfY OF AAAL1p Nf11011U, IOOBEL IO.Iw11B1f AC10AL eveoe Ile~l m51Mie Af.TW 11191E 1s•1 /IB~e movie IIS1fAE tO61fg17 Mp / ICCi. OS1COItti0A1 fI1wL RY 1lY9e n 16BYE liflMle 0699 St, ItYBR Iel - t9 111FN iMl 111Fe 1111-M LlyRlq wrt w Inpgtrtll Arr e-Silt Ilw Ir1tIrN iu - C/Y 711urM /,III I/,1M f,Sn II,OM 1 Iwo nellrtr is - t/1 Serrll 1 Kf 1 1 16!) IW Im..t Flenl::w W ri m IM Iw 1111 IMlty 0 Intwt 1 0 1 1 0 10-391 w01 TrMw+ In / 1 1 1 (/) 1 -- - SWtm~l -~-- ----I,/i5 -----15,/15 1.151 IS.MI (S) 70fA191FCIAl A967B171111D5: I,IN,95 7,61,11! I,N7.59 1,111, pl N,19 ~~ Cin Oi OIAL1p 0.YIIdl1/ «w:..~.,..:i„u„a ACI1105 ACllMI M9iE0 IIIONON IIIYlU[ IN'0 N]IMIN N'ION 6'0 NiOM]N (ONI{Nq illw / .ICti. pNC0i1TI0p ]OGl 11A0 NNNE N NYBIIE t711M11D NNN911, NYNN 1M - IN1 IMFN INI INFN INFIO FgwIF111tt PAIN 1]-1w1 1101 Int~Nt Frn1n{n I1,N1 1N.511 1].N] IS,IN fM.Nll nw t~ rw NLIN 1,N{,fN MI,MI 1,tN,M1 (iN,SN) 33-!111 1001 Utmfw~ In 1/1,IN w.111 N,IN II,NI (5,1111 SWtnbl -~- ~ - -- 111.151 }, 111,IN IN,N1 1,]N,ON (IN,IN) IntlnpplvnltnNi SWIa n-awl I/ao mtlnNt slm;nN Isl,ns /s,nl nan n,Nl N,N1 1511 NIINrt IflMiet Mdwrlt 11} E/I 1 !N (111 IOe} VNn ftr 1N,}{} }3i, 51/ /t }]1,510 1 n-]wt f00i RINfIM Ir. ].61 I,In 0 I,NI 11 - - ]aNet~l - '--~ 131,111 ~ S11.Nf 11.111 3n,1i1 21,N7 ~3 ~r CIlY W AAH110 CUCMMLI BWOOi AWUSiRlliO ACMLL M161AF 16'0 H11M0» f•AAI / A[Ci, OE%tlMlpp 0I%H 1FY MY91AF IMI - 1H1 11»il Iwfit ;vnttnOnt ACRVLL NBIIH ItUGiF AI1l0[ AK'0 H11MIH (pNMA») AI A»BYF HOIMiH 1&E~9 70, Af191A1 1111 1111-» 1111-» 11-1101 1110 Intrwt fouoq• IH,IH N,H1 71.111 H,HI (1.111) 11-1»Z 1001 irwfw In 1 1 e • tulewd ~ 111.I1i 11.111 tl,Ht H,IH (t,pl) tofu /M»IFIAAY PAW : LIH,HI 0,»1,0N 1»,111 1,IHdpt IHI,I/Q aAw 1/1r< - Au n11H ».tll.»/ u,nl,ln Isa»,/» H.ns,IH (1,a1.HSt !1!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!1!11!111;1.. iililiiiiiHiii ii{ii!i1i11!lil wn:H-11 IwPt Obb<w:Iww\OMMI•M111HIHt) V 'r. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jmaes T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer e~3 . SUBJECT: Approval and execution of a new agreement for sharing the cost of the maintenance of traffic signals at city boundaries between the City of Ontario and the City of Rancho Cucamonga RECOMIENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve and execute the agreement for sharing the cost of traffic signal maintenance for boundary signals between the C1>iy of Ontario and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga have traffic signals and 7ntersectton ilghtin installed and maintained on streets containtna the n~~~rn,... ~ot::c ;; _., L~K t,w cities. in order to define the maintenance functions to be performed 6y each city and to specify the dl5tributlon of casts, the subject agreement has been prepared. Prior to this time, the two cities had informally split the costs by fully maintaining relatively equal numbers of locations. The numbers are no Longer equal, thus an agreement which formalizes the process 1s desireable. The agreement refers Y Exhibits 'R' end "B' That are lists of the various locations. Each list also contains the percentage spilt of any costs incurred at each location and which city is responsible for maintenance. The agreement provides for the addition or deletion of iocatlons when the City Engineers of each city approve. Also provided is that each ci!y sha]1 bill the other on a semi- annual basis for the cost of services incurred over the period. Such billing shall also include a summary of actual maintenance and power costs. A 101 functional and administrative overhead assessment is allowed to cover indirect costs incurred 1n providing the maintenance services. 5S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 JUNE 6, 1990 The agreement also contains provtslons to hold harmless one city for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done 6y the other city. n "moo f: i EIRIRIT 'A' TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATIONS SCHEDULE I - INIMTAINW BY THE CITY OF ONTARIO Maintenance d Operat ton Cost Sptit No. Location Cntar in Rancho Cucamonga 1. Grove Ave, d 8th St. 75% 25% 2. Vineyard Ave, d $th St. 50% 50% 3. Haven Ave. d 4th St. 50% 50% SCHEDULE II - ININTAINED aY THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICi111011GA No. Location Ontario Rancho Cucamonga 1. Archibald Ave. d 4th St. 50% 50% =J Y E1(HI9IT '8' ~. No. 1. 2. 3. No. 1. INiERSECiION LI6IITIM6 SCHEDULE I - W1IMiA[NED BY THE CITY OF ONTARIO Maintenance 8 Operation Cast Split Location Ontario Rancho Cucamon0a Grove Ave. 8 8th S*_. 15>: 25X L'ineyard Ave. d 8th St. 50S 50X Haven Ave. 8 4th St. 50X 50X erurn ~ ~i _ ~LNIn1NtU 6T IiIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAININGII Location Ontario Rancho Cucartwn0a Archibald Ave. 8 4th St. 50X 50X S$ - CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager HY: Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS Supervisor SUBJECT: CONSZDERATiON TO APPROVE ANNUAL CONTRACT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR AN AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT ID SYSTEM (CAL-ID) IN THE AMOUNT OF $96,080. RECOD4IENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the contract with San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department for an Aut omatad Fingerprint ID System (CAL-ID) in the amount of$96,080. HACnGRGUND/ANALYSIS: The City enters into an agreement annually with the County of San Fingerprint Identification System^for the benefit of the citizen's within their jurisdiction. This agreement is for Fiscal Year 1990/91. The only difference in this agreemenr is the language changing Automated Fingerprint Identification System to Identification Systems. s ild/~lA(y ubmit d, erry B. Ful od Deputy City Manager JC)C ~ tIC Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 ('~ TO: City Council and City Manager v FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer i SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for Day Creek Phase 3A improvements from Airport Drive in the City of Ontario to I-15, ,lust south of Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in an amount not to exceed 510.5 million to be funded by San Bernardino County Flood COntr01 District with Ru rnau of anN a~aN nn loan fimAe_ nv an agreement approved previously with the Flood Control District, the said Federal loan amount will be repaid by the City's Redevelopment Agency Fund 22. RECOMIEMDATIDM: It is recommended that the City Council approve the su6,{ect contract with the San Bernardino County Flood Control 0l strict and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Day Creek construction administration is being funded by the City from the proceeds of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 84-1 and from a portion of the RDA tax increment and a loan from the Federal Bureau of Reclamation. The construction cost for this Phase 3A will be funded from the said Loan Funds which are administered by the flood Control District. The contract for the Phase 3A construction is scheduled to be awarded by Lhe County Board of Supervisors at a meeting in June 1990, after execution of the sub,~ect agreement. The agreement provides a mechanism for the rountY to proceed with the Day Creek pra,~ect. The County has now received the full amount of the Federal loan money of approximately S13 Million, and deposited in a separate fund for the completion of Day Creek Project. Previously, the City's Redevelopment Agency entered into an agreement with Flood Control District whereby the agency agreed to repay the loan from Lhe pryc?ede Of the tar 4nC.romeat espesialiy set aside for Day Creek Pro~ec t. Re c uY5 ltted, ~ I ` /~ R /M.W:fllw /"~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 (Z T0: City Council and City Manager L~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Dan James, Sr. Civil Enolneer SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities for Parcel Map No. 9416, located east of Naven Avenue, between Highland Avenue and Leman Avenue, submitted by Civersified Properties Company III - UR 004 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utility lines on Haven Avenue, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of Parcel Map No. 9416, Diversified Properties Company III, the developer, was required to underground the overhead utility u-- .. :~. ...n i..^• e1 An nP Navon aunmm Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, and the conditions of approval of said development, the developer has requested to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City to be reimbursed for a portion of the undergrounding costs from the adjacent properties directly benefitting from the undergrounding. Assessor's Parcel No.'s 201-271-63 thru 201-271-171, along the easterly side of Haven Avenue, are alt Dart of the subject development; therefore, no reimbursements will be made form said parcels. Assessor's Parcel No. 201-262-45 is currently developed as a service station within Neighborhood Commercial zoning. Undergrounding in-lieu fees have not been contributed to the City in the past. Therefore, contributions toward the subject undergrounding may become possible at the Lima of City's conditioning of future redevelopment of said parcel. Assessor's Parcel No. 201-262-46 1s currently developed as a shopping center within a Neighborhood Commercial zoning. Undergrounding 1n-lieu fees were contributed to the City at the time of development of said parcel as CUP 87- 04. Therefore, the reimbursement contribution of said parcel in the amount of 514,362.25 will be paid from the City's undergrounding fund. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PM 9416 - UR004 JUNE 6, 1990 PAGE 2 Assessor's Parcel No.'s 201-263-01 thru 201-263-25, and Assessor's Parcel No. 201-262-36 are developed as residential condominiums 1n Low Medium Residential zoning, which are categorically exempt from payment of undergrounding of overhead utility fees. Assessor's Parcel No. 201-262-40 is currently a vacant parcel in an office/Drofesstonal zoning, which can be subject for reimbursements of undergrounding of overhead utillttes at the time of tts future development. The Engineering staff has reviewed the total costs of the undergrounding, and Lhc dist~iSution of Life coals. The City has provided 10 days notice Drior the date of the Council's meeting to those parcels affected by Lh1s agreement. Respectf lly submitted, 0.HM: :dlw Attachments ~~ ~', RESOLUTION N0. 9Q - a ~I A RESOLUTION DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON JUNE 6, 1990 FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF A PORTION OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES LOCATED EASTERLY OF HAVEN AVENUE, BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by 0lversified Properties Company III, as developer of Parcel Map 9416 far the undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utilities on the east side of Haven Avenue between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue (UR-0041; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said undergrounding operation; and NHEREAS, the owners of the ad,Toinging properties will share in the expense of the undergrounding operation costs as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the salve is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucmanga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. Co3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Approval and Execution of Program Supplement No. 14 to Local Agency - State Agreement No. OB-5420 bebveen the City u( ridreho Cuca.:oo,a and "_ •' "` California for the modification of existingCRailroad Crossing protection devices at the Rochester Avenue at Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing No. 2-95.0. The supplement sets the Federal portion of the protect at 5119,700.00 and the City's portion at (13,000.00 with provision to increase the City portion should the need arise. Funding for the Supplement Agreement shall be from Systems Development Funds. RECOMIEMOATIOM: t• i~ Mn.nh~ • nnwnnAnA •Y,ai 4M riW rnnN'il rnnrnvP .1nA PYPf II}P the attached Resolution that authorizes the execution of Program Supplement No. 14 to Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 08-5420 and a certified copy of said Resolution along with the executed original copies of the executed Supplement be sent Lo the State of California for their execution. sAClccRaino/ANALrsls Attached herewith are the duplicate original copies of the above subtect Program Supplement No. 14 to Local Agency -State Agreement for Federal Aid Protects No. 08-5420. This program supplement provides for railroad crossing modifications at the Rochester Avenue at Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing No. 2-95.0 for four (41 new crossing arms and for the removal of 2 existing crossing devices to allow for the widening of Rochester Avenue. The supplement sets the Federal portion of the protect at (119,700 and the City's portion at f13,300 with provision to increase the City portion should the need arise. The Federal portion to be limited to the amount shown. It should be noted thet the City will provide for the pavement widening up to and away from the railroad crossing with CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPDRT ROCHESTER AVENUE RAILROAD CROSSING PROTECTION DEVICES JUNE 6, 1990 PAGE 2 ~X, ii, ';:. separate construction contracts at City expense as part of Rochester Avenue Improvements. Funding for the Supplement Agreement shall be from Systeios Development Funds. Respect 11 ~SUbmttted, / ~/ ~ ~~~~~~~ RHM. AD:sd Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 9~- a.3~• .0. RF$DLUTtDN OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PR06RAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 14 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT N0. OB-5420 FOR CROSSING PROTECTION MODYFICATIONS AT THE ROCHESTER AVENUE AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING N0. 2-95.0 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "Local Agency"), has for its consideration and execution, the Program Su element No. 14 to Local Agency-State Agreement No. OR-5420 for the modification of existing Railroad Crossing protection devices at the Rochester Avenue at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Crossing No. 2-95.0; and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, District Office O (hereinafter referred to as "State") processes and monitors Federally funded protects; and WHEREAS, as a condition to payment of Federal funds for said protects, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Program Supplement No. 14. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for and of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to: 1. Authorize the Execution of Supplement No. 14 to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08-5420 for the Installing of 2 N9A cantilever flashers with stub gates and 2 N9 gates with flashers to be controlled 6y motion sensing devices with necessary actuating and operating circuits and instrument housing, to replace 2 Ng's at Grade Crossing PUC No. 2-95.0 Rochester Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County. 2. To authorize the Mayor to sign said Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type 1n the Resolution number and date in the blank of the third block of said supplement and for the return of the original copies of said supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with the certified Copy of this Resolution. BE IT AL50 RESOLVED, that the Local Agency shall also comply with the "Special Covenants or Remarks" attached to said supplement including: 1. Payment of Local Agency portion of said agreement estimated at 513,300.00 and such increases as required to complete such construction. ~~Q RESOLUTION N0. CROSSING PROTECTION MODIFICATIONS AT ROCHESTER AVENGE AT A.T. 8 S.F. CROSSING PAGE 2 2, io Reaffirm the "Nondi scri mf nasion Assurances" tontat ned 1n the Local Agency Agreement No. 08-5420 for Federal Aid Program. 3, To agree that the payment of Federal funds for such project will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Adainistratton to the Federal-aid Protect Agreement (PR-2)/Detaii Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and to accept aAy increases 1n Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or 81d Letter ar its modification as prepared by the Division of Local Streets and Roads. 4. Aii required pavement markings and advance warning signs shall conform to the requirements of NUTCD, 1978 and shall be placed 1n thetr proper iocatlon by the Local Agency at the time of completion of the Railroad's work. 5. The cost of maintenance of the crossing shall be as allocated by the Public Uttllties Commission. ~~ -a. ~.. .f r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6. 1990 TO: Hayor and City Council Hembere FROR: Duane A. Baker. Senior Administrative Aasista:lt SVBJECT: AMIIiDHD AHI101f. CORTROL CONTRACf WITH 9A. B. DIHO COORTr Rscouaadaeloa It ie recommended that City Council authorize azecutlon of the attached contract wLth San Bernardino County foc Animal Conttol Servfcea in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Background Tha attached contract is identical to the contract rerrentlp !.^ nEisct ... ...a C tty. Th^_ service levels and etafflnq levQe of the contract zema!.n the same, The only difference Le the annunl amount o! the contract. The current contract with the County La for a total sum of $35,600 per year. The proposed contract would bs for a total amount o! $62,700. Tha inc ree aed nnst reflects the chsngea in the aalarisa and benefits of County employees, and the eervlce• supplied by the County that have occurred since 1987, when the current contract was signed. Attached for your lnformet ion ie a sheet showing the County's coat for providing en Leal control. Although the new contract amount Sa larger than the current contract, there will be no negative impact on the qty's budget. Ths reason for thin ie that the Clty hoe budgeted in peat years $75,000 annually to handle animal control cceta. This was done to prCVlde a contingency to provide for eaNrgenciee end additional services. Again at aft reconaaende that the eLty Council authorize execution o[ tN emended contract with the County of San Bernardino Cor animal control aerviese for an amount of $62,700 to ba fundsd from Account Ho. O1-a285-6028 (general overhead contract aervicoa). Rp~act£ully bm ed ///{// /l.~Gdc« ~. OB alr DB\209 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH \ ~`\')'('iG ~~\~~ ¢ couNrv of sAx aEwulo!xD 767 NaM Mt. ViEw AvNNN 8b 4:npAYw, CA 82416-0010 1711!387-0480 ti \Z~ GEWIGE P.. PETTEaEEN, M.D., M.P.N /N/)I~q\~\\ Di,~cmr o~ Wdk Naar May 3, ]990 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Duane Baker P.O. Box 807 .,...o..,, .. ~Cm~Oliya, Cif yliiii Dear I1llaile, As Me discussed today, the following is an amendment of the March, 1989 contract proposal figures: Salaries/Benefits: Animal. Control officer (2.5 FTE) $ 77,000 Animal License Checkers (1.0 FPE) $ 21,900 Public Infornlation Clerks (0.7 FTE) S 17,000 $115,900 Services/Supplies: Vehicle Casta $ 19,600 Licensing Program Costs $ 18,000 Office F]cpenses $ 7,000 shelter Services $ 11,500 $ 56,100 Subtotal of Salaries/Benefits and Services/Supplies $172,000 A-87 (10.04$) $ 17 300 Total Costs $1~9 300 Less Licensing Revenues ($12ti, 600) Net City Cost $ 62,700 Should you have any questions or require additional information, please call ne at (714) 387-2500. Sincerely, anne L. KroegES, Program Manager San Bernardino County Anima]. Care and Control OU6 CASL Mrll Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-0003 1-800-472-5609 or 714-387-2500 .1LK: tb ~( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pubiic Works Inspecto~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECQIEMDATIOM: The required street improvements for Tract 13722 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond to the amount of f136,700.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performnce Bond in the amount of 51,367,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13722 - located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Milliken Avenue DEVELOPER: The N1111am Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite 6 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5136,700.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 51,367,000.00 Respectfull submitted, Y ~~° RHM:SMGis,1n~-- --------~--- Attachments RESOLUTION N0. -/~ - a 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13722 AND AUTHORiZIN6 THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public isproveaents for Tract 13722 have been coapleted to the satisfaction of fhe City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Coagletlon is required to be filed, certifying the cork coaplete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga hereby resolves, that t/re work 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Co~pletfon with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 7( ;. OROINAN CE N0. 418 AN ORO INANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY DELETING PORTIONS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROVISIONS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE N0. 17, ENTITLED "POSTING OF STREET NUMBERS" AND BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.26 ENTITLED "STREET ADDRESS POSTING", TO TITLE 8 OF SAID RANCHO CUC AMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Recitals. (i) The County of San Bernardino has adopted a uniform system of house numbering for the County and said uniform numbering system has been made a part of the County General Plan. (ii) The City of Ra nc~io Cucamonga has continued the County uniform numbering system since S~~orporation. (iii) It is necessary for the purpose of emergency response to maintain a numbering system that is consistent with other jurisdictions and as free of confusion as possible. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 6, Ordinance. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and orvdain as follows: SECTION I: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Section s 63.071 through 63.076, inclusive of the San Bernardino County Code adopted by Ordinance No. 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga are hereby deleted. SECTION 3: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, entitled "Health and Safety", of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended by addition of Lh apter 8.26 to read as follows: Chaster 0.26 STREET ADDRESS POSTING Sections: 8.26.010 8.26.020 8.26.030 8.26.040 8.26.050 8.26.060 Assignment of Street Addresses Posting Required Size and Location of Numbers Multi-Building Properties Street Address Numbering Review Enforcement 7a Ordinance No. 418 Page 2 8.26.010 Assignme nt of Street Addresses. Street addresses shall be designated and assigned by the Community Development Department, a designated division thereof or other agency in cooperation with the Community Development Department. 8.26.020. Po sting Required. Street address numbers shall be conspicou sly posted and thereafter maintained on each building located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. tactvrloNS: 1. Buildings accessory to residential buildings. 2. When street address numbers fora single family residence would not be visible from the street due to distance tram the street or obstruction, numbers may be posted on a post or other independent structure. Such numbers mounted shall otherwise meet the requirements of this chapter. Nund~ers posted on free standing mail boxes, are acceptable under the provisions of this subsection provided no more than one mailbox is installed at the same location. 8.26.030 Size and Location of Numbers. All street address numbers posted pursuant to this Chapter shall meet the following minimum requirements. a. Numbers shall be no less than four (4) inches in height with a corresponding width. b. Numbers and their background celors are to be of significantly contrasting shades. c. Numbers are to be readily visible and readable from the street on which the building or building fronts. d. Numbers painted on curbs are not acceptable as a substitute for the requirements of this Chapter. 8.26.040 Multi-Bu ilding Pro erties. Properties developed with mare than one main building and where 6?vtsability to all building street numbers from the street is obstructed or is otherwise unreadable, shall, in addition to the numbering for individual buildings, also be provided with independent structures located adjacent tq the street frontage upon which the address numhrrs have peen assigned, showing in readily visible fashion, the beginning and ending numbers assigned to that parcel. Where numbers are assigned on more than one street frontage, such independent structures shall be provided on each frontage. ~3 Ordinance No. 418 Page 3 8.26.050 Street Address Numberin Review. For other than single family res id entia properties, location, size, contrast, visibility and mounting of street address numbers for new projects shall be subject to and a part of review under the "Land Development Review" process of Chapter 17.06 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 8.26.060 Enforcement. The Building and Safety Division shall be responsible for initial installation of street address numbers required by this Chapter. The Fire Chief of the Ranchn Cucamonga Fire Osst.;crhalt be responsible for enforcement cf maintenance provisions of this Chapter. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Da ilv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Cr~tar io, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 7~ ORDINANCE N0. 420 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 12.08.050 OF THE RANCHO CUC AMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO EXEMPTIONS FROM REQUIREMENTS TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NOW, TH EREFORE> THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO f, OC M1UNOA MES HERE BY uROAiN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 12.08.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended in words and figures, as follows: "12.08.050 Construction of Dubl is improvements - Exception;. The provisions of Section 12.08.040 shall not apply to the following: "A. Alterations which do not intensify the use of the bu ildin9 or structure, or generate a greater hazard to public health and safety as determined by the City Engineer; "B. Maintenance and/or reconstruction of a building or stru ctu r~e provided the total cost does not exceed fif**-y percent (50%) ofi the fair market value of the existing building or st n+c to re; "C. Anv addition nr rnmita r;~e ana +~+~~_ •+~!; ;^ - sixty (60) month period, to an existing single-family residence provided that such addition or additions do not exceed a total area of six hundred fifty (650) square feet; "D. Any addition or cumula Cive additions, within a sixty (60) month period, to an existing commercial and/or office building totaling less than five hundred (500) square feet or an existing industrial building totaling less than one thousand (1,000) square feet. The provi- sions of this subsection shall rat aDP1y if such addition or additions constitute more than fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the existing building: "E fOnStruG~ion Cf varaGes. caPDJr`ti, storage buildings, patio covers, swimming pools, spas, and similar structures accessory to a single-family residence; and "F. Construction of accessory structures W a commercial/industrial/office building (e. g. strucW ral covers on existing outdoor storage; fuel pump building; carport strut W res over existing parking stalls; and, similar structures); provided such accessory structures do not intensify the use of the building or property." 7S Ordinance No. 420 Page 2 SECTION 2: The City Council declares that, should any Provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislative, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he puhl fished within fi fter. !15; days after its passage at lease once in the Inland Vall ev Da i1y Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga. 7(~ ORDINANCE N0. 421 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.12.010 OF CHAPTER 2.12 OF TITLE II OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE LOCATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS NH EREAS, the City Council of the City of Ra nc ha Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: S"eCTION 1: Section 2.12.010 of Cha Dter 2.12 of Title II of the Rancho Cucamonga Min is ipal Code hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "2,12.010 Meeting Place. Regular meetings of the City Wunc ii shall be held in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Ra mho Cucamonga, California." SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published within fT fteen (15) days after its passage at least once in Inland Yallev Dailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario~fornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 77 ;(. `ira„ s - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Duane A. Baker, Senior Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: ORAPFITI REIfARD RHBOLOTI011 RHCOMNHRDATIOm It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the reward for graffiti conviction as provided in Ordinance 419. HACEOROHHp This resolution establishes a minimum reward of $100 for information leading to the conviction of vandals who have defaced public or private property with graffiti. The resolution also provides for the reward amount to be set higher in circumstances when the City Council feel it is warranted. Finally, this resolution would designate the identities of those seeking this reward as confidential information which would not be released to the public. Respectfully submitted, ~uaMe ~6ct~,t ~qs DAB:tlr DAB\264 7 ORDINANCE N0. 419 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE dY ADDING NEW SECTIONS 8.24.040, 8.24.050, 8.24.060 AND 8.24.070, PERTAINING TO GRAFFITI REMOVAL AND THE SALE OF AEROSOL PAINT NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Chapter 8.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended, by the addition of Sections 8.24.040, 8.24.050, 8.24.050 and 8.24.070 to read, in words and figures, as follows: 2, "~' hewa rd for m to rma tion. The City Council may, by resolution, offer and pay a reward, the amount to be determined by any such resolution offering such reward, for information leading to the determination of the identity, and the conviction, of any person who willfully places graffiti or other inscribed material upon public or privately owned permanent structures located on public or privately owned real property within the City. 8.24.050. Sale of aerosol oa int containers - sto r-oe requirements. Any business or establishment offering for sale to the public aerosol paint containers weighing six (6) ou nc as nr le« Inot vo ;n6r ,.a ...,.,.,,.,.-_~ .~-.. store and maintain such containers in a Cpl ace that pis locked and secure, or otherwise unavailable except by special request. 8.24.060. Penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, fire, par the rsfiip or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the require- ments of Section 8.24.050 hereby adopted. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any pruv is ion of said Section or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or by imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partnership or corpora lien shall be deed guilty of a senora rn effen se for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of said Section is committed, continued, or permitted to continue by such person, firm, partnership or corporation and shall be deemed punishable therefor as provided herein. 8.24.070. Civil remedies a ailable. The violation of any of the provisions of Section .4.050 hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated 6y the City 7q Ordinance No. 419 Page 2 through civil process by means of a restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance. SECTION 2: Severab ility. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of the Ordinance hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive leaislat+o n, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of said Ordinance hereby adopted shall ruin in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valiev Da ilv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation Buhl ish ed ,~ ...e r <:. .-.- O,-, tariu, W ii fo rn ia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. s,., k', ~' 4').: RESOLUTION N0. 90 ~3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING REWARDS AS DEFINED IN ORDINANCE N0. 419, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 Of THE RANCHO CUCPMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO INFORMRTION LEADING TO THE CONVICTION OF ANY PERSON PLACING GRAFITTI ON ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did amend the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code with Ordinance No. 419 6y adding Chapter 8.24.040 Reward for Information; and WHEREAS. AWnic final (bd ina nrn N,. a,o rw ~r.__ °._'. ~' Lien u.'av .uYU, allows for rewards for in fo rotation leading to~the co ny is tian of~a ny person who inscribes any public or private property with gra fitti; and WHEREAS, the rewards pursuant to Ordinance No. 419 have been esta- blished. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that rewards for in forms tion leading to conviction of vandals who have inscribed grafitti shall be a minimum of One-Hundred Dollars ($100.00), and that the City Council reserves the right to offer a higher re ua rG 9n circumstances as de to nnined by the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the ident lty of those seeking rewards shall ba cnnsid ornd rnnftAnntt.t to ti...~„rt..~ .,a ..+n .,... ~.. __,____, . public, 8~ ;. y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 TO: Mayor, Members of CI!y Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry B, F ulwood. Deputy Clty Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNL`AL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITIi1N L4NDSCAPE MAI!V'IENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3. 4, 5. 6, 7 AND 8 F OMM NDATION~ It is recommended that City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and Resolution establishing [he assessment rates for Landscape Maintenance DLStricls Nos. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5. 6. 7 and 8. BACKGROUND /ANALY I Because of City Councd's enhanced commitment to the City's Assessment District program over the last five years the assessments within the Landscape Mamtenance Distracts have been Irnolved in a downward trend. This trend started m 1985 and has continued Into June of 1990. However because of Inflationary pressures and Increases in amount of lnfrastruc!ures maintained, the costs within some Assessment Districts are beglnNng [o increase to the point that we are recommending some assessment Increases. Staff believes [hat uUlUing the Consumer Pnce Index (CPI) Is a reahstic approach to address this issue. Curtentty the ICPII rPna~~G ~ tom. ~..,..o~... r,.,r....,...,,-.~_.- ........r..,_..... _. ____. _._, .....~. ,..,,, y.....s o.. ..,~.onoc wui Le mwuwreuuea for one. The following Is a summary of these assessment dfsmcts Landscape Mafnlenance Dismct No. i -General City The recommended assessment rate ($35.00) includes the C.P.1, increase of 5°,u and an increase to fund the capital improvement protects approved by City Council in October of 1989. A list of [he approved Improvements Is attached lu ^re Eugineer's Rcpuri. The current assessment is $25.00. Landscape Maintenance Dlst det No. 2 - Victoria The area being maintained by [he distract wW double during 1990/91. The cost of maintenance Is the basis for the 596 increase In the assessment rate ($204.75). The cost of maintawng the parkways and parks has increased dramatically end even with the Increase proposed expe::ditures a•L! need to be monitored very <9nceiy ro insure vff!c!e.^.! !u.^.ds Car t.*.e year. A;iy of the 1989/90 carryover funds will be used for contract maintenance. The curtenl assessment is $195.00, Landscape Maintenance District No, 3 ZONE A - FfYSSOP This eight parcel distract continues as protected and no mte Increase Is needed for fiscal year 1990/91. The current assessment Is $258.75. CriY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT IANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIBTRICTS June 6. 1990 Page 2 ZONE B -COMMERCIAL DISTRICTB Commercial and Industral properties make up [his district and provide the funds Cor maintenance of median islands within the commercial and industrial area. The concept for the assessment rate at formation was to spread the necessary costs over the acreage wahin the dtstrtct. An increase of $5.00 per acre is necessary m provide sulttctrnt funding and the maJor expenditure continues to be contract mamtenance. The proposed rate Is $175/acre. The current rate Ls $170.00. Landscape Mazntenance Dtstrlct No. 4 -Terra Vista The recommended mte ($110.25) Includes a 596 merease necessary due to the Increase m park maintenance costs. Four neighborhood parks Witt be maintained !n 1990/9( Fv~•ndu~.->~ ^•"' `r ^-r•'^- a:iy :., ,..e s.u?n:,c.a iunuu,g antl arty 1989/90 carryover funds will be used Cor contraM maintenance. The current assessment Is $105.00. La-^dscape Maintenance District No. 5 -Tot Lot This dlstnct does not change m number of amts or area maintained, The currrn[ assessment mte otffi105 is sutlictent to cover costs for 1990/91 with 1989/90 carryover (ands, fandseape Maintenance DisMCt No. 6 - Caryn The current rate ($195) is sulflcient to turd maintenance for Rscal year 1990/91. Since landscaping has Just recently been accepted for maintenance by the distde[ it is recommended that the rate remain stable unfit a mamtenance hlstary paifem can be devdopcd. This provides sufficient landing for unexpeMed expenditures that cannot be protected at this tlme. City directed s[a(f to exptott the usage of any excess funds within [hfs dlstrtet to acmulrr a nark ••°b1::..".c ' Co,.cmuy s,aii rs woraing towards thSs end. However, there is $167,000 N possible carryover within the Caryn plan landscape distrct. These (ands can be used to assist in the acqulsl0on of a park site. Landscape Maintenance DlsMct No. 7 -North Etlwanda This 1s the first year for assessments in this distract and the mle ($75.00) is based on funds raga tred to maintain landscaping on the f!rst tracts w7thSn Etlwanda Highlands. The rate Cor this district will Increase as development occurs. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 -South Etlwanda This Ss the ilrst year for assessments N this district. The rate (695.00( is based on protected costs for Landscaping far the fkst tracts within the disMet. The rate for this diatrlet wtll increase as development occurs. /R~speetfully sUbmitt~~^ JeU rry g, Fu1 ~ . Deputy Clty Manager JBF:JmC Attachments ~3 ~~ 86/88 88/87 87/88 88/89 89!90 90/91 Landscape Maintenance $38.00 $28.00 $25.50 $25.00 $25 (x1 $35 00 DLStdct I (General City) , , Landscape llRafntenance $22,',,77 $223.17 $195.00 $195.00 $195 00 $204 75 Dtstdc[ 2 (Vlctona) . . Landscape ivfalntenance on % i $0,00 $258,75 $2.58 7.r, m^O° ^~ _ _ . seotl. /5 $258.75 ..~...~. ymopl Ir Landscape Malntenantt $0.00 $0.00 $O,Op $45/per acre $165/per acre $170 00 DLStrlct 3B fMedfansl . Landscape Maintenance $154.10 $128.34 $105.00 $105,00 $105.00 $110 25 District 4 (Cerra Vista) . Landscapz Maintenance $163.64 $113.41 $111,00 $105,00 $105.00 $105 W DisMct 5 ITo[ Lot) . Landscape Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $195.00 $195.00 $185.00 $195 00 Dlstncl6 (Caryn) . Landscape Maintenance Dlslncl 7 (N. Etlwanda) $75 00 Landscape Malntenantt D1s[nct 8 IS. Etlwanda) ~~ ~~ ~s ~'ia. $95.00 RE8OLUTION NO. ~ -,a 3,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 'f0 LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH I.AiNDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2. 3, 4. 5, 6, 7 AND 8 WHEREAS, the Cfty Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of May, 1990, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 90-183 to order the therein described work to connection with Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 which Resolution of Intention No. 90-783 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of intention on ffie to the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurtsdlctlon facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said Cttl% Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. ACTION 1: Ft IR h/+rPhy rnenlonri hr ttie !`its ^,;,;Ir,;,u Jf u~c iiiy ui Rancho Cucamonga that the public Interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the Fiscal Year 1990/91, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described to said Resolution of Intention No. 90-183, be done and made; and ~~ SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1990/91 and method of assessment In the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. U'S .ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ (GENERAL CITY ~ .~ FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMI'['CED BY: SPEC WI. DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Raricho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Pazkways & Equestrian Trails) Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 {General City) is prepazed in compliance with the regmrements of Article 4. Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Protected operations and maintenance costs for Fiscal Years 1989/90 and 1990/91 are provided In this report. Protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to furnish the highest quality landscaping at the lowest possible assessment rate. Assessments are used to furnish services and materials for maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways and equestrian trails with the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. I is considered of general benefit to ail azeas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of parkways and equestrian trails include repair of irrigation systems, removal or replacement of all or part of landscaping Improvements. The maintenance also includes provfdtng for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. Trimming, spraying, fertilizing and/or treating for disease or tntury as well as removal of trimmings, rubbish or debris are part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls immediately adtacent to parkways aze repaired and kept free of graffiti as part of the maintenance process. Capital Improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and improvements are as stipulated in the condtUons of approval for each development and as approved by [he Engineering Division. Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review General City During fiscal year 1989/90 additional moisture sensors were installed in various parkways for the conservation of water. Moisture sensars have proven to be of great benefit to the reduction of water usage and subsequently water costs. As of Protected 89/90 Budget 02/28/90 06/30/90 Assmt. Admin. $ 36,172 $ 36,172 $ 36.172 Overhead $ 1,130 -0- $ 1,130 MaL~t./Opcr. $ 15,000 $ 785 $ 5,000 Veh. Maint. $ 5,500 -0- -O- Cont. Trees $ 5,000 -0- $ 5,000' Tratl Malnt. $ 12,000 -0- $ 5,000 Contract -Van. $ 10,000 -0- $ 10,000 Contract- Maint. $ 80,000 $ 56,547 $ 80,000 Tree Maint./Admin. $ 17,000 -0- $ 5,000 Capital Exp. $ 15,000 -0- $ 15,000 Water $ 17,000 $ 13,938 $ 22,128 Electric $ 6,000 $ 3,928 $ 6,000 Cap.Imprvmts. 000 _0_ _p_•• TOTAL $3 39,802 $111,371 $190.430 " The contingency account for trees established to provide funds for Lree replacements required due to a maJor storm or disaster has $10,000. This money 1s in a reserve account and can only be expended upon approval by City Council. City Council reviewed possible capital Improvement protects during the current year and the $120,000 budgeted will be carried over and budgeted for 90/91 capital protects. During the current fiscal year the following tracts (diagrams attached) were annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: ",„. ~. Flscai Yeaz 1990/91 The proposed expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 reflect the intent to provide continued high quality maintenance as well as maintaining a reasonable assessment rate. Budget 90/91 Assmt. Admin. $ 40,940 Overhead $ 1 280 Mamt./Oper. $ 5,000 Veh. Maint. $ 1,000 %oni. Trees $ S~j Tra11 Maint. $ 12.360 Contract -Van. $ 6,000 Contract - Maint. $184,250 Tree Matnt/Admin. $ 14,000 Capital Exp. _p_ water $ 2g,r~O0 Electric $ 5 800 Cap. Imprvmts. $120, 000' Addt'l. Cap.Imp. $437.250•' TOTAL $853,880 ` Carryover from 1989/90 " Capital Reserve Fund Loan to D1str7ct and Carryover Funds REQUIRED REVENUE Protected Assessment Receipts $400,802 Capital Carryover $120,000 Loan ezzz n~o TOTAL $853,880 Due to protected maintenance costs there will be no funding of equipment or vehicles protects during fiscal yeaz 1990/91. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexations for Fiscal Year 1990/91 ANNEXED MAY 3, 1989 Tract 12420 114 AU. ANNEXED JUNE 7, 19$9 Tract 13359 6 AU. ANNEXED AUGUST 2. 1989 Pazcel Map 12218 3 Au. ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989 Pazcel Map 5996 4 AU. ANNEXED SEPT. 6, 1989 Pazcel Map 12573 2 AU. ANNEXED ()C:T d, 1989 'h'art 13??~ 1^ =:; Tract 12820 16 AU. ANNEXED OCT. 18, 1989 Tract 13810 7 AU. ANNEXED NOV. 1. 1989 Tract 13930 23 AU, Parcel Map 11685 3 AU. ANNEXED NOV. 15, 1989 Tract 13813 6 AU. ANNEXED DEC. 6, 1989 Parcel Map 9431 5.88 AU. ANNEXED JAN. 3. 1990 Tract 13851 ~ i !! L~. Tract 13621 7 AU. ANNEXED MARCH 7, 1990 Tract 13890-1 Tract 13890-2 It Is estimated there will be 13024 assessment units within this district in fiscal yeaz 1990/91. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover funds and protected costs, the assessment rated will be set at $35.00/unit. Assessment receipts for any fiscal yeaz are not realized untll after December 10 and a portion of the estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the disMct for the first s1x months of 1990/91. 1990/91 Assessment Rate 9899 Assessment Units x $35.00 = $346,115 3125 Assessment Units x $14.88 $ 54,687 89/90 Capital Carryover = $120,000 C~pit~i lii:sC::c:: uii:l LUUii $333.078 TOTAL $853,880 ?.< CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 seo ro S60 $50 S40 bJV $20 82/83 83/84 84/85 85/86 86/87 87/88 88189 89190 90/91 Fiscal Year --r Assessncent Rates ~: CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROJECTS Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 DESCRIPTIVE LOCATION ESTIMATED COST S/s Base Line, Ramona to Cambridge $ 34,50P S/s Base Line, E s W of Cen t.er $ 18,750 S/s Base Line, from 500' E/o Center $ 18,000 NWC }ia ven & Wilson, Haven Erom Wilson North; Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; Mayberry from Wilson to N/o Poplar S 55.5nn N & S Side of Victoria E/o Haven to E/o Mango E/s Haven S/o Victoria $ 36,000 S/s Banyan from Zircon to Carnelian $ 33,000 SWC Lemon S Hermosa; Hermosa from Highland to Lemon, Lemon Erom Hermoa to 750' West $ 19,500 N/s Wilson, E 6 W of Birchbay $ 15,750 NEC Hermosa and 26th $ 19,500 E/s Haven, N/o Railroad ~ i-u,5uu E/s Hermosa, N a S of Railroad $ 37,500 W/s Archibald from 200' S/o Almond to 175' N/o La Cclina $ 27,000 N/s Banyan E & W/o Jadeite; W/s Archibald N/o Banyan G/c Artie thyst from S/o Sunflower to Manzanita $ 16,500 NEC Archibald and Wilson; Archibald from S/o Cottonwood to Wilson, Wilson E/o Archibald $ 12,000 E/s Beryl N y S!o Culpepper ~ „ v •+r+o , S/s Lemon from 350' W/c to 600' E/o Mayberry $ 15,000 S/s Alta Loma from Revere to Mayberry; includes W/s of Revers from Altd Loma to Highland and E/o Revere from 185' N/o to Highland $ 13,500 W/s Beryl N b S/o SunElowe[ $ 15,000 N/s Banyan from E/o Zircon to W/o Vineyard $ 11 250 , W/s Hermosa N s S/o Ironwood $ 11, 25D N/o Lemon ~/o London $ 13,500 N/s 19th E s W/o Mayberry $ 13,500 E/s Archibald N b S/o Sunflower $ 12,000 S/s Victoria E & W/o London S 12,?50 S/s Wilson Erom P.r chibeid [o Amethyst; 'r./~ Archibald SJo Wilson S 13,500 WIs Archiblad N b 5/s of La Gloria; N b S/s of La Gloria W/o Archibald S 79,sn^ TOTAL $527,250 ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 axxExaTtoH: 5-3-Q9 _fLVLNTw___.__ __ 7Tf[LT _ L[OfND 0.17' near uawr • LTL[lT TN[[ fTll[fT TM[f • I OUA 1 Sptu (f ALYYf /I~IhIIA ~ !(V(NTN (T (YfALV VAY N646Mek AV[. ~~' fIM1N tlll[f N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: '17~1lA2n 3' `f .5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANIv~XATION: ~-Sl--J~l- ~ ~ i ~~ ~~ Ih I I _ __~ \ i s \ ~` I s i ,~~ N Ciry of Rancho C-ucamonga Project: T~L~ :y: . ~.,; ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIN'TETlANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: B'I' S4 NINETEENTN STIIEET -------.-_____~_._1 ~ I ~~ II _ ~l III ~~' Neil it ~ - ,aro~+~~ I ~( =~ ti I~I 077 AC~ i ~ ~~~~ I~ I I ~m~ I I~ ,_~ I ..s, ,~. I~j ~ >'~~=i i ~ I ~I~ I~ °I II II ~~~ , . I j ~ -~~ ran e. i']~i2e93~° I ~ I 'I City of Rancho Cu_ camonga 8 Project: ~/~/ ASSESSMENT DL4GRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTIIVANCE DLSTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~/~~~ ~/IISON AVFNUf ~ ,. - - . . > _ _ - m _. _ .---........_ A A ~ - ...... ...:.__ _,-'_ - ...-_.. m m $ -- ~~. .,__ _.. -' -- - '. ". .'. . _ r._'._.-_ 1 _...... t . 3 _.. - ~ - - ~--- -- -- __. T ' i. __ ..-.. I ;- - 4 _. ~_.... ,~,{! I~illiJlT~6/~YYtf ~! J `l. City of Rancho,~uca~yoryW _ ~ i Project: ~ rMS7 :k <;t- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTINANCE DLSTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~ •B4 i I ~a~• w~~ ~~ t ~J j 1~ I - i. (`~_' ~ • 1~- ^ ~•r i ~ 11~ 1 ~ l~~ ni ~~~ ~u i ill ~t1RI.71C1. 'JAI@ I ,~~ r City of Rancho u onB~a Project: i lll~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLS T RICT NO. 1 ~/ n ANNEXATION: ID ~' 'b_! l0 ~I ~~I ~ ~~~ , ' ~i i _ v an 1,q gg ~ , , 3 I ' l q I !~I I~ I .i tm am ~iAd ' ~ i ~ I I ~hJ i ~ ~h I YI I i _.___ _. _____i___T.._ ~ ~ ~ sr --• ~ ~ ~ - --- 11--~-- --~- ~ ~ , nekMC~ rRCaar arrrawr i ~..~. -~-- .. :.~, N city of Rancho ucamonga Project: ~_ vv~~ ` ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAEVTINANCE DISTRICT NO. I ArrNExATIOnr: /0 - 4 - $4 .~y , :~ J _,_ taN sue I I ' _ _ ~ i i __ _-_ _. _.__ ~_-_ .._ _ __. _?.yii __ _ ... ~,. _ _. -r .... ~~ ~ r..~.~~... ~..., i ~., ~T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~]~ypy~y~}j ~ ~ ~~ ~ i 1 '~~~.. ~ ~~~ ',~I f 1 ~i uu[P li .. J' ~qa¢ • M a+a1 w~ N/H lGlf A•1-tl00 1N ~•rMw iP[ 4i1 r~ AM lOI~ tMw t N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Pro~ct: -~,~ `:a ASSHSSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: /Q~I~'8A I i 7 °'" f t I'I b I~ k ~ .r ~ a ~ . u F i N (1( N/LLS/~l 7~ew~ x City of Rancho Cucam n a Protect: ~~/o ASSESSMEi~'T DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIlVTE[VANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~I~ ANNEXATION: N~I•~_ I i ~ i . ... war c.~ _ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ --- ,, ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ •,~ ; 1~ i , I-- y- --r- . --h~i I r ~~ I x City of Rancho C~cem_ gng~ _ Project: (~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I,.4NDSCAFE MAQVTINANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: II• hgq -4- ..1...,t ...t ..t. ~ ,. ~ - ~ : ~~ ~~ M .... R J i ~, ` ~ \r /.~~ j~~ .. I =~_ _fiii~` ~ !M i N 1 City of Rancho onga Project: ASSESSMENT DL4GRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIdTINANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~ ~- /_fj'$Q 19th SSRfEP PPpPFAIRZ 071RP ~ Im.LMN1 AVL. \ LOP 2 LOP ~ LOP 0 LOf 5 1!A' 6 ror 1 ', \~ ____ PmPOl2OC6 LN8 LOsCdO ~~ ~s111~1' 4I4~! N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: ~i'b~I"?~`R`~1'~ lN~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: •b•~ HILLSIDE ROAD .~ ~} a r• W I W 6 N J Y ac ~T f~ City of Rancho u a I Project: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTEfVANCE DISTRICT NO.1 I ANNEXATION: ~ ~~~ ~ `i I aw.''y 'j. ~~. ~ i vF_ "~ n ,r, I ~ ~" iY ~~ u !s y, u :1 I u :~ ~g}..f. u .~ N s y ~. i i I zest~s ~ a~ N ~ 3, i ?L~ ao N • ~ v ? h~ T ?} .s ~ w .~ ~ n = v ~$ 'a a ai •a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~..... w ~ as ~, yy I _ ~'~ _ ' .i N i ~ '° t ~s '" ~ s D OTES CITY I ~~ ~~ ~ ~ INTAIiIED AREA n O D OTES STREET L GHTS I ~i~L$ ~a ~~ ~u i ~ 1 I ~~~ a ~ ~ fa ao ~ ~~K' ~ : 1 ~,ay"'_' II '' i ~ 4 x City of Ra~,cno c~ `e" ~ a' Project: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENMICE DISTRICT NO. 1 A ANNEXATION: ~ ~ 7~_ I I I ~ ALMONO STREET ~ I I ~ ~ ~ z W J ~ W ~ W ~ m ~ _ N C =~ _ i ~nuL31NE ROAD t h r s t ~ ~ WILSON AY[NU[ ~ t I - ~~ J~ City of Rancho Cucamgngal' Pro e t '~J~j ll~~ j c ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTETiANCE D~I{STRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: 3-~7A <f i I ., '~ i 1 ~ '° • >tl M ~ A' ~ i { S et ~' ~ ~(!' ti{ • w ~ T Af M b • w M s1 s Z u b t b N t; K n C O n a~ u ~ b ~ Is ~ M ss MApeCILA OR. i IA 1{ p ~~ 1~ h b {1 it I fiiGNWVD ,AVC. ~~~// J~ City of Rancho~C,l~camQgga _ , Project: ~J.~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCrE~ ~D/L~STRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~•-/'7d I ~ i I I ~ b " v ~ /~ i. ~~~~ u ~ x v ~~ v ~ u u ~ u ~~ a>' ~ ~ b _ ~ b sl ~ t " ~ :a 'O ~ ~_ sa _~ ~ ~ C~ '~L c City of Rancho Cu~l o~Aa L Project: ~• ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SI7BM?TPEU t3Y: SPECL'3L DISTfL'CTS ADYSiiQiSTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Victoria Planned Community Fiscal 1990/91 The annual report for Landscape Maintenance Disrict No. 2 1s prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 5 of the Streets and Hf¢hwayc Cade Stare of Cal!for.^.!a (Landscape a^~ L1ghting Aci of 1972). This report deals with the maintenance costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the projected maintenance costs for fiscal year 1990/91. These projected costs aze used to determine the assessment rate required to provide the highest quality of landscaping at the lowest possible assessment. The funds aze used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways, parks, and trail Improvements. Maintenance of this district is considered of general benefit to alt areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated fn this report. marntenance of parkways, parks and trails include repair of irrigation systems, removal or replacement of all or part of landscaping improvements and necessary cleaning and repair of trolls. The maintenance also includes providing the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping. Trimming, spraying, fertilizing and/or treating for disease or fnjury as well as removal of trimmings, rubbish or debris are part of the ongoing maintenance. Walls Immediately adjacent to parkways are repaired and kept free of graffiti as part of the maintenance process. Park, parkway and trail improvements w(thin Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and Improvements are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Englreering Dhtisfon. '~ :,>, Review of FYSCaI Yeaz 1989/90 There were no unusual maintenance problems during the year. Maintenance of the districts pazkways continues to be the lazgest expense. 89/90 As of Protected Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assmt. Admin. $ 14,056 $ 14,056 $ 14,056 Overhead $ 3,329 -0- $ 3,329 Maint./Oper. $ 30,000 $ 7,612 $ 20,848 Ve}~. Maint./Oper. $ 12,000 -0- $ 5,000 Contingency Trees $ 5,000 -O- $ 5.000 Loan Repay. $ 00.000 -0- $ SO,000 Trail Maintenance $ 5,000 -0- $ 3,000 ContractServ. $270,000 $215,101 $322,656 Contract Vandalism $ 35,000 -O- $ 35,000 Tree Malnt./Cont. Adm. $ 15.000 -0- $ 5.000 Capital Expend. $ 10.000 -0- $ 10,000 Water $150.000 $ 62,875 $120.000 Electric $ 12,000 $ 3,614 $ 7,500 Pazk Maint. $142,000 $ 18,849 $ 72,000 Irrigation Restrn. S 20.000 -0- Q 5.000 $763.385 $322,106 $678.389 z ;s Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The protected expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 will provide for the continued maintenance of parkways, parks and halls. The squaze footage to be matntained will double as the majority of pazkways in the area of Milliken between Base Line and FLghtand have been accepted. Landscape District 2 Budget 90/91 Adliiin• $ 17,060 Overhead $ 2,498 Matnt./Oper. $ 9,700 Veh. Maint. $ 11,000 Contract Routine $ 650,349• Contract- Vandal. $ 10,000 Capital _p_ Water $ 170,000 Electric $ 14,000 brig. Res. .0_ Contingency $ 500 Loan Repay. $ 55.458 Cont. Admin. R 2n lR7 Trail Malnt. $ 38,117 Pazk Matnt. $ 242.699 $1,241,548 Due [o protected maintenance costs there will be no funding of equipment or vehicles during the 1990/91 flscal yeaz, ' Includes approx(mately $368,000 of protected 1989/90 carryover funds. Actual carryover will be detenntned after 6/30/90. PROJECTED REVENUE It is estimated there wlll be 3982 assessment units and approximately 415 acres to be assessed as vacant land. After review of current expenditures. assessment receipts, protected maintenance costs the assessment rate for Fiscal Year 1990/91 will necessitate a 5v/o Increase from $195/unit [o $204.75/unit. Assessment receipts for any fiscal year are not received until after December 10. A portion of the estimated carryover funds will be used to fund the district maintenance costs until January. 3982 A.U. x $ 204.75 = $ 815,315 415 Acres x $ 5i.19 = ~ 21,'l44 1989/90 Carryover $ 338,349 Interest = $ 58,833 Penaltles/Del. _ $ 7.588 TOTAL $1, 241, 329 C07Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 $230 $220 $210 $200 $190 82/83 83/84 84!85 85!86 8618.7 87:88 88/BS 89/90 90/91 Fiscal Year -~- Assessmart Rates i j ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ~ I T.ANI]S[:AP.F_. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (HYSSOP AND COIbII1~ERCIAL/IIVDUSTRIAL) FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Su13Mi'1~TED nY: SPECIAL BISTRICTS ADMINISIRAT[ON APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY E;IGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ZONE A Hyssop The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3- Zone A 1s prepared in compliance with the requirements of Arttcle 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Calffornia (landscape & Lightmg Act of 1912). Thic ronnrt nmvirina infprmaHnn nntlining actual mamtenanr.P. COSLS for Zone A (Hyssop) for 1989/90 and protected costs for fiscal yeaz 1990/91. The protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality of landscaping whsle maintaining the lowest assessment rate. Assessments wlll be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways in the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Zone a) is considered of general benefit to all parcels within Zone A and the coats shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of vii nr am. n~r1 nr am. /mnrmmmoM nrn.d Alnrt fnr Itin Nfo m~na+N~ hnnU{. nn.i __. __ _.__~ c__- __ ___~ ____y____ _________ ~__.__-_-o -__ _._ -__. ~-.. _.. _. ~._~. ~... beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertlLzing or treating for disease or inJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adJacent to the cultivated azeas. Parkway improvements within landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Zone A were constructed by the developer. The plans for the Improvements aze as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review The maintenance of Zone A (Hyssop) continues normal and routine. This portion of Izndscape Maintenance district No. 3 remains constant with eight pazcels. No changes aze anticipated for 1990/91. 89/90 As of Protected Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assmt. Admin. $ 32 $ 32 $ 32 Mamt./Oper. $ 10 -0- $ 10 Veh. Maint. $ 135 -0- $ 100 ContractServ. $1,450 $ 886 $1,450 Water $ 300 $ 152 $ 250 Electric $ 150 $ 92 12 $2,077 $1,162 $1,967 Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 1990/91 Budgct Assmt. Admin. $ 32 (h~rrhrari -n_ Maint./Oper. -0- Veh. Maint. -0- Contract Mafnt. $1,519 Contract -Vandalism $ 44 water $ 315 Electric $ 160 $2,070 PROJECTED REV-ENUE 8 Assessment Units ~ $258.75 = $2,070 After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, protected expenditures, the assessment rate for 1990/91 will remain at $258.75 per parcel, City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance Distrtet No, 3 ZONE B Commercial /Industrial The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3- Zone B (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared In compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides information outlining protected costs for fiscal year 1990/91 for Zone B {Commercial/Industrial). The protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping while maintaining the lowest assessment rate. Specifically, assessments will be used to famish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of median islands within this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 - Zone B is considered of general benefit to all pazcels within Zone B and the costs shall be divided as Indicated !n this report. Maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all nr anv Hart of anv mvrllan talanrl lmnrnvrmrnt nrnWrlina fnr thn lifr :.rnwth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trismtrg, apragirig, fcrtslL-.:.g or treating fer disease, or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from areas adJacent to the cultivated areas. Median Island improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Zone B were constructed by developers and/or City contract. The plans fo: median island improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Dfvision. ' ".k Fiscal Year 1989/90 Review Replacement of trees damaged by wind were replaced during the current fiscal year. There were no major problems with maintenance and water consumption have been reduced. 89/90 As Of Protected Hudget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Admin. $ 624 $ 624 $ 624 Overhead $ 590 -0- $ 590 Maim./Oper. $ 9.000 $ 75 $ 2,000 Contln¢encv R i,ntxi -n_ a l.ruln ContractNand. $ 9.000 -0- -0- Contract/Maint. $ 60,000 $35,078 $47,000 Tree Malnt./Adm. $ 2,000 -0- -0- Capital Expend. $ 30,000 $18,860 $20,000 Water $ 12,000 $ 4,827 $ 9,600 Electric >S 1.600 $ 887 ~ 1.400 $125,814 $60,351 $82,214 During fiscal year 1989/90 the following protected were annexed to Zone B of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Commercial/industrial{. P.NNEXED APRIL 5, 1989 DR 87-44 1.5 ACRES DR 87-42 .64 ACRE ANNEXED MAY 17, 1989 PM 12057 1.81 ACRES ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989 DR 88-07 5 ACRES A.N?~?E?~'D JUNE 21, 1989 DR 88-25 1.5 ACRES ANNEXED JULY 5, 1989 PM 11891 131.03 ACRES .~ 4. ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 PM 11852 ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 20, 1989 MDR 89-07 DR 87-48 AA1NE?~D OCTOBEP. 4, 1989 DR 88-21 DR 88-14 AIV tVGAGL Vli1VISLK iU, i989 DR 87-34 ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989 PM 12121 PCL 1 PCL 2 PCL 3 DR 89-10 DR 88-43 ANNEXED DECEMAFR 8. 1989 DR 88-29 DR 88-32 ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990 DR Erb-i3 CUP 87-29 ANNEXED FEBRUARY 7,1990 DR 88-19 PM 12058 ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990 DR 88- l1 12.51 ACRES 3.82 ACRES 2.36 ACRES 2.27 ACRES 2.8 ACRES 1.7 ACRES 2.07 ACRES 1.92 ACRES 3.79 ACRES 4.6 ACRES 1.78 ACRES 2.34 ACRES 1.55 ACRES (i.3b ACRES 3.58 ACRES ~, T'. Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 All pazcels wfthln Zone B will be assessed on a net acreage basis for the maintenance of landscaped medians on Haven Avenue from 4[h Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east Ctty Limtts, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue Crom 4th Street to Foothill boulevard, 6th Street from Haven to Rochester Avenue and other median islands on mator divided highways within the ]ndus[nal SpeMfic Plan Area and Foothill Boulevazd overlay area. For fiscal year 1990/91 the median island on Haven Avenue from 4fh to Deer Creek Channel and other portions fronting commercial/industrial development. Projected 1990/91 Expenditures Assmt. Admin. $ 728 Overhead $ 255 Matnt./Operations $ 13,214 Veh. Matnt./Open. $ 5,775 Contingency -Trees $ 500 Contract -Vandalism $ 5,000 Contract -Routine $132,228 Tree Mafnt./Cont. Admin. $ 4,675 Water $ 10,000 Electric $ 700 At1 7Z t17F After review of expenditures for 1989/90 and protected costs For 1990/91 st has been determined Lhe assessment rate for Zone B will be $175 per acre. 989 Acres ®$175 = $173,075 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 5300 5280 5260 $2a0 $22C 5200 Rfi/R] g?!gg 9glg. ~3;BC SGl9i Fiscal Year ~- Assessment Rates ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTINANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: %S'89 _ CIYIC CENTER 0 YE I ~~ I _ I ,= i ~ ~.~ ~: ~ree~ ~. i 1 ~ ~ ' m. I. City of Rancho uc ong;J Project: 77 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTAARICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION: ~s•B7 ~°`" I % `_4VEHUE ' / ~'_ 9 1/ I I I 1 4.~ W` W O:~ N\ 11 /~ 2 / ~ / I] ti ~ O If Y I / / ' J//~f 10 / s ~ / T / \ \~~ _ CIV fD CCR ER DRIV[ _ \~_ • ~f STREET TR[[ Tr-[ CIVIC CENTER OR. -RURW CARAlIi[RA A L[![IO . ~lTR[[T ~IlNT • /TRELT TRE[ 1 City of Rancho C~ ~an~on~Uf Project: QgQ]~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTINANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: y/7~~ i i Q P. M. No. 12057 I i I ~~ __ ej`~ ` ~~ Ciry of Rancho ucamonga Project: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: ~-~'a~_ .- 6 t/j Stn~f I Jo, P. ,,f. B B9/ °' I 1 - s~rE ~~ r i _ ~N4 J'14IIT~ y w.w ri.warv A1W4/ ~ ~wiM ~ V • 1 `` I P...~tQ 9~/~~-moo l'~ City of Rancho C_ucacpgpga, Project: ~~~ ASSESSMENT DAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLST~RIAC~T N0.3 ANNEXATION: 6-1J-B4 -' ~ . -----~ ~I ~ . I ~ ~~ ~-~_ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ _i -vt.wr- ~I ~ _~ SRE 'i ~ ~ • ~~~ ~I •. ,. ~~ ., , ..~ \~\\ 0. ~~ ~ ~. -~ ~~ IWLf1•TEPYNT Lf~nT I _ . TF1,~ST _ E,~ ( a srrw t,gwr ~ ~ , Ciry of Rancho CucarrSq~~~ Project: .~.~' ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: .J„s_89 l C/L ARRON ROUTE ra I : ra la ra IQ ret ss Iii In -a • ' t.na r a.r r t.w r t.at. r sau r t.rl r -Cl ~ btu r /Ol I • bt1 r P6'- i t.~r -OL I~ /iL 1• t.tt1 r It.11t r • -0. ~ • I.ttl r• ~• /~ I• W]y t.tt1 ttt -~ ~ • -il 1• ~ M /•~ ~ MM r • ~ i ra 7 -CL I/ ~ t•Yt r ~1~~~ - =. ~ ..tll r •r~ .... • ..... _.~~_ ~ i R '- o ~ -a ~ rr' b ra- al t.q r It.t1 t1 a.ol r -a to rx n 6~It r I~a- • I ttrat>_t~ Tnfa /fntlsaot~la IMMIT • ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • f7RiLT 11Ya tMl/(T. City of Rancho Cucamon a Project: ed./L~!/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTENANCE D[LS,T~RICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION: 9-~n~E"1 _ atw~ iom ' ~"'~ ClU ~ ~'t>~.U1l.C! r a r r r r r .a ~ .~ ~ FF r • ~~ i*C i iii ® ~ ~ non _- ~wKw rte. r.r~ ta7CI N City of Rancho uc onRa Project: /~, ll~~ .~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTINANCE DLSTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION: ~~A ~9 E ~ wrrnw s+nttr ':Ti.'~ i i W ~ _ ... ~ 1 f Yrr i '-~ ~~'. YM1~ _... ..__... pa~~ /~0 artt~ I ~ 1 v ..... ._._. _.. . ~f 14~~1~1Wy{ ~M w~rar Ida ~ .~ ~--'r ~ l'~L'a'iwt-,aa ~ ~ rtfw aaruw~ ~i~ ~ u ~, i .. /IltifK ~ . M C~ ~~ 1 A! City of Rancho Cucamon a Project: ~QB ~.~'' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR[CT NO. 3 ANNEXATION:a 2o-g9 Erranrr c~Ira rump ' ~--~- - - - - ~ :C~orasrr ~~~r rystue cuwtu wrrsr LL , ~ - ~~T7~ '~t - P ~ vaod L.li=~ --~ morwvx y ~ »u a fnr .vwrw srrrrr ~ uw-tof-ot~-rr I I ~ } - ~ ~ 3 I !~ a i ~ ~_ N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Project: ]49.48 l/N~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIS'CRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: 19'fFl 51REET i 1 I ~ ~~~ ~~~ I ` I '~ .:< 1 i : ~ ~~ 1~ City of Rancho Cuc .g; I Project. ~M v ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATTON: ~~4=Sq I c. >~ r i _ 9M S~ie~t ~~' r • . • • . • gC~RCUSICEX-~uYO~fR- GcA. 8909 9th sf, N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: 1aQ88_tq~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIlVTENANCE DLS~TRAICT N0.3 ANNEXAI'[ON: /4-IAa7 ~ .. i.- i~ r•. sai. a' • .. .. urnu... nLLiiLFY~ BL W~ / ' oRe~ ~ . . n ~J O O fi cry oI Rancho c =~~=a~ P<a~: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: ~~ ~? ~ f Ciry~of, ~ o C.~i/i/ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: ~~~~~ i ~m fn~T I ~- ~ ~Ieefle«a~C.~. ~ •• .. ..Ka ~ naoa ~ ~I + I E U ~~ J~ City of Rancho Cucam I'roJect: aro llN~~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i ;I ~ ! ~I ~ _1 `~\\ ~~ . I~ ~ ~\ \ ~ ~:~ ,:\~ a ~~ I U '~:: \ \~\ ~ wpm rtwwr ~ ~.. _. ((~`" _ f+ll I x swr-~.;»~~ city of Rancho c_ u_camgng='~ Prof ~~7 AssESSmIENT vu+cRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: .~- \~. ~~ ° ~ i ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ,:~ :., ~ , ~ ~ , '~, ~"~~ ~~~ ~. jkTfNTIAN j i' ;~ $?ISIN i ~{~ ;;; 1 i` ;Y I ~ I';~ ~` .. L~ i ' .~~ .- - TL City of Rancho Cu '~T+ Project: a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTINANCE DLSTRI CT N0.3 A ANNEXATTON: I ~-rs~9 FIFTN STREET ""^ r '' I r~ `" 01~1~1~1~1~1~I~1 1 ~ 0 , i f °'" J oue sTORv acpK WLANi +:. wmw ~ ~ /MOV RN 1i ~ N _4 6~ !YA 011Y 1'W~ I6! ~ M ® MwM-a«M D31L Nn ~~ ~iWt/ 1MIM 2S ~. +R MMaf uylp 1 a 1 City of Rancho C_uca¢1ong~a Project ~• '/ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ADISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: ~ ~39~ I~ ~~ I ,,--P.-,r-.~~ ~ - i ` I, ~ it ~ ~ ~J ll~ C~-J-F-~C~L~--9--11 ~ . ! I i I II ~~ II L, f.__.LJL~ 3 ~L_ D ~ ~~ ~ ti ~~ ~~,~~. ~~~ i +-~ ,. ~~ ~=i ~ i ~.~ a- a ..... a~_ „ _ ~, ~ i !I I! ~.%..~ ~ ~ -~- ~I l I = d ,, ,,,~. ~ ~ ~ ~ _--- I _~ ~ ~ I .....~, x City of Rancho C_ ucar~ong~ Project: ~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAEVTENANCE DISTRICT NQ. 3 ANNEXATION: /~~ i ~,,.r ~ -~~ -'-` - - ----~ t ~ I ,d <_. ~. _ %~ ~I I I 1~) ,11 ~ ~ f ~ ~ l'~ , .d ~ ~ ~ i ~~ _> ~ P z ~ . it - ~ l M+; I r ~ S ` ~o '~ ~ {~ ~~„ ~. • O ~ i I II J ~. City of Rancho Cu_ c~ ongaZ~ Project: ~~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNE!CATION: ~Zq~ 1.5/T~ / ~~~ ws --- ~.._ ~~.;t~s ] ~ ~ tiA +Y n~ ®°~ 0 i i O ' • rY~Y ry1l ~rFrM rr f _ ~ r IMI ~Yw N ~ ~ ~ M w. 1 • 9 h ~ t,.. 1 ® 9 r ~w l~ ~ ~ •~ ~ I rYr ' ^ is A I ~ ~j' er ~' Zi r ~ •' w ; ~ w~' ~' ~ . - ~ .wt - ___ ~4}I i City of Rancho C_ ucagong~ Project: ~~• N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 r~I ANNEXATION: ~- I "9~ 9 *- ST _T __ T ~ ~r ~.t.,~ . i - ~ --- ~ I i~ ~ '~ .,`.._;..__ ~.I ~il Cit. -) ~•+ i ~ 1 J!,~_;-_! I ;i.r y't.-. .t. ~~ ~ICa sly .'. ~~ _ L {-- ~ -- -n - I -. .._ ... .__ _.._ ...e- ~ I I'i ~ ~ t w ... L~.Y):f ~'T4w I . ~ l~wry • a..r e . ;h ~ Y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ...KvU' .- ~ i ~I~ ,.y' '. , i.,.r., i L ~ r _ _ -- ~ . I ..... r ~ ~ I' N i City of Rancho Cucazn a Project: p~' JQp,S~ ti !4 '~d. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: 2' Z I^q~ . ~pu +txuaa,ti:o N,e ., ~ KMaK ppR + •.w C~ ~® ~ i I L' • i ~ I . ~-~ 1~1 ~~} ~ (/ JJJ\~~s,~ .J1~ ~~ ~ ~iyd Ciry of Rancho C,/ ucamonga Project; ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMl1ZUNTf1~ -- .... ~ F(SCALYEAR 1390/91 CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 Terra Vista Planned Community Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The annual report for fiscal year 1990/91 for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista) 1s prepared fn compliance wnh the requirements of ArUCIe 4, Chapter 1, Dh~lsion 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides SnforcnaUon outlining actual maintenance costs for 1989/90 and protected costs for fiscal year 1990/91. The protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping and the lowest possible rate. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servlMng and restoration of parkways, parks and trails tvlthtn this district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 is considered of general benetlt to all aeeas within the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Maintenance of pazks, parkways, and trails include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any art of any Improvement, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of~the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treatlng for disease or inJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and grafflU removal from walls immediately adJacent to the culgvated areas. Parks, parkways and trolls within Landscape Maintenance District no. 4 were constructed by the developer of the individual subdivisions. The plans and improvements are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. s Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90 Maintenance during the current fiscal year on landscaped azeas con[mued to be routine. Currently there is $12,750 in a reserve account for the replacement of trees lost in major storms or disasters. These funds can only be expended upon Council dlrecUon. 59/90 As of Protected Budgec 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assmt. Admin. $ 11,276 $ 11,276 $ 11,276 Overhead $ 1,480 -O- $ 1,480 Malnt./Oper. $ 14,000 $ 641 $ 3,000 Contingency $ 5,000 -0- $ 5,000 Trail Maint. $ 3,209 -0- -0- Contract -Vandalism $ 14,000 -0- -0- Contract -Routine $ 99,000 $ 56,118 $ 75,000 Tree Maim./Admin. $ 12,000 -0- -0- Capttal Expend. $ 10,000 -0- $ 10,000 Water $ 52,000 $ 29,497 $ 40,000 Electric $ 5,900 $ 3,502 $ 4,680 Park Matnt. $100,000 $ 18,472 $ 31,600 Base Une Medians 5173.000 $ 30.327 $ 173.000 $507,465 $149.833 $355,036 During fiscal year 1989/90 the following tracts were annexed to Landscape Maintenance D1sMCt No. 4: ANNEXED October 4, 1989 Tract 13304 59 D.U. ANNEXED November 15, 1989 Tract 13662 29 D.U. ANNEXED February 21, 1990 Tract 13664 & -1 28 D.U. Fiscal Yeaz 1990/90 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 continues to experience normal and routine maintenance actlvttles. 1Wo parks (Coyote and Spruce) and befng maintained by the district with the work being performed by City Crews. The parkway maintenance continues to be handled by a contract maintenance company. Assmt. Admin. Overhead Mafnt. /Operatians Veh. Ma1nt./Oper. Contingency -'flees Trafl Maintenance Contracc -Vandalism Contract -Routine Tree Mafnt./Cont. Adm. Water Electric Pazk Maintenance Assessments ,;. st: Single Family Multi Family Commercial Vacant 89/90 Carryover Budget 90/91 $ 12, 504 $ 1,640 $ 2,500 $ 6,000 $ 500 $ 1,911 $ 4,300 $ 56,813 $ 2,693 $ 50,000 $ 5,500 $208.660 $353,021 $ 171.328 $ 135,163 $ 7,856 $ 662 $ 315,328 $ 37.693 $ 353,021 >.,, r TERRA V[STA PLANNED COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT BENEFIT MATRIX FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 Medians Packs Parkways Single Family 1554AU. $ 16,003.25 $ 91,603.54 $301,769.40 Multi Famlly 1478 AU. $ 15,220.45 $ 87,124.11 $ 32,811.60 Commercial 113.44 M. $ 3,165.48 $ 6,661.35 b Vacan[Land 64.54 Ai. $ 661.82 ~ ~ $33.051,00 $185,389.00 $134,58 L00 ESTIMATED COSTS Median Maintenance $ 33.051.00 Pazk Maintenance $185,389.00 Parkway Maintenance $134.581.00 Total $353,021.00 Benefit Units lylealans razxs razxways Single Family 1554 A,U. 1554 A.U. 1554 A.U, Multi Family 1478 A.U. 1478 A.U. 739 A.U. Commercial 227 A.U. 227 A.U. -0- Vacant Land 129 A.U. -0- -0- Single Family Benefit Assmt. $134.73 x 1554 = $209,370.42 Credits -0- Carryover $24.48 x 1554 = $ 38,041,92 Ne[ Benefit $110.25 $171,328.50 ~,a K',. Multi Faintly Benefit Assmt. $ 91.45 x Credit -0- Carryover -0- Net Benefit $91.45 Commercial Benefit Assmt. $ 69.26 x Credit -O- Carryover -0- Net Benefit $126.57 Vacant Land Benefit Assmt. $10.25 Credit -O- Carryover -0- $10.25 1478 = $135,163.10 $135.163.10 113.44 Acres = $7,856.85 $7.856.85 x 64.54 Acres = $ 661.54 $ 661.54 ~,., 'z,' CITX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 S160 5150 5140 5130 570 5110 $100 65/88 86/97 67/68 66/89 89/90 90/91 Fiscal Year -o- Aacessment Ralea ~c.., .. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRwICf NO.4 ANNF_XATION: IA-rll'B9 _~ > ~ s 9 a u Q .~ ~Nigya auva i ~~f i f City of Rancho Cucam a Project: ' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTINANCE DLSTRICT N0.4 ANNEXATION: I1• ~~~9 T--~4~- v eP s ,~ -c v ., ~ i _ ~ , _ 2 y I: ~~-1 m e ~I ~~ i 6 111 ' I' e ~ I l~~ a i ssa.,l ~ : f ~T I ~ I c~=, I '' k ~ -~ ~ ,. ti - ....~ w ' ar s N ar at ai ar is N ~ I ~. x Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Project: ~f~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 ANNEXATION: 2"~ • q~ 'z ~ r ~ = ~ ,. z. r , :, ' ' '} ~. ` ~ ~ a ~w\ ' Z i ~ ~/~ '~ i ~~~ 1 \\\\\v///// ~ ~~ ~ II ~~ ~~~/ ~~ ~~ ^-- ~ ~~ ,; , ,~ , ;;f, x Ciry !~ oCucamon a ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 ~ (TOT LOTJ ~' ~ i' , . ,:~ ',' ~~ k ~~ r., .~+, F~ i~ ` ~~ I ' q ~; ~t ,' FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The 1990/92 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4. Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and H[ghways Code, State of California (landscape and Ltghtmg Act of 1972). This report provides Information outlining actual maintenance costs for 1989/90 and protected costs for fiscal yeaz 1990/91. The protected costs are used to estabUsh the necessary assessment rate to provide the highest quality landscaping at the lowest possible assessment. Specifically, assessments will be used to furnish aentiees and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of pazkways and the tot lot within the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated rn this report. M`IMn~~~no ni fhn fnf IM n~ii nnelnvnv Ient~~iln 1hn ~ ~ntr _ m_I n . p~~_.. ~J °C~.~. replacement of all or any part of any Improvement, providing for the life' growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, tnmming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or 1nJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls [mmediately adJacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway and tot lot improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivision. The plans and parkways are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90 Maintenance continued normal and routine 1n Landscape Maintenance District No. 5. There were no annexations to this district during the current Ciscal year. The district was formed with the 44 units within the tract and there ar no plarzs to expand this district. Budget As Of Pro]ec[ed 89/90 2/2S/90 6/30/90 Assmt. Admm. $ 176 $ 176 $ 176 Overhead $ 23 -0- $ 23 Mamt./Oper. $ 150 -O- $ 50 Contract -Vandalism $ 150 -0- -0- Contract -Routine $3,400 $2,1 10 $3,180 Water $ 600 3 136 a 103 Electric $ 125 Q 46 $ 72 $4,624 $2,468 $3,684 Fiscal Year 1990; 91 Assmt. Admin. $ 176 (lvnrhnarl G R4 Maint./Operations $ 167 Contingency-Trees $ 50 Veh. Mafnt./Oper. $ 25 Contract Serv. $3,751 Water $ 200 Electric $ 80 Tree Mafnt./Adm. 22 $4, 737 This district will continue to contain the original 44 units. After review of expenditures, assessment receipts, possible carryover ($117) and pro]ected costs, the assessment rate for Ftscal Year 1990/91 will remain at $105.00. Assessment Rate 1990/91 44 Assessment Units x $105 = $4,620 89/90 Carryover $ 117 $4,737 s. k, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 s17o SSfi0 5150 5140 S130 5120 5110 5100 85/06 86/87 87/98 88/89 09/90 90/91 Fiscal Year ~ Assessment Rares y ~~ .~ 1 H... - --_ i ~ ANNUM. ENGINEER'S REPORT i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 i I r;CARYP3 PLF-NNL'D LOI1dMUNIfiS~ ~ • <::: •~, °o_°o - ~IdY~1~~YUtItl~I~I~F~~ °° "~- ~ F[SCAL YEAR 1990/91 CCCY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Enptneer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1990/91 The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 Ir aryn PlannrA Cnmmnni}vl is nrrna nA !,.; ~,^--- "' r.... ~C.T.~....,a..o waaaa iim requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides information on actual maintenance costs and protected costs for fiscal yeaz 1990/91. The protected costs aze used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide quality landscaping whffe maintaining or lowering assessments. Assessments will be used to furnish services and matenals for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of pazkways within the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. B is considered of general benefit to all areas in the district and the cost shall be divided as Indicated in this report. Detatied maintenance activities Include the repair. removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement, providing for the Iife. growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or tnJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adJacent to the cultivated areas. Pazlc.;~ay imp:over..ents within Landxape ida:nteua;ue District Nu. G were constructed by the developers of the indlvlduai subdivisions. The plans and parkways aze as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engtneenng Division. Review of Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Parkways for several tracts were assumed for maintenance during fiscal year 1989/90. The previous problems with plant materials were corrected and the ilnancfal responsibility for maintenance of Phase I have been taken over by the District. Budget As of Protected 89/90 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assmt. Admin. $ 3,756 $ 3,756 $ 3,756 (lvnrhParl .d` fd1 _A_ >T, RdQ Matnt./Oiler. $ 10,375 -0- $ 1,000 Veh. Mafnt./Oiler. $ 1,264 -0- -0- Cont. -Trees $ 5,000 -0- $ 5,000 Trail Malnt. -0- -0- -0- Contract -Van. $ 6,400 -0- -0- Contract -Routine $ 46.000 -0- $ 20,000 Tree Main/Con. Adm. $ 2,600 -0- -0- Capital $ 5,000 -0- -0- Water $ 32,000 -C- $ 1,000 Electric $ 3.000 -0- $ 200 brig. Restor. $ 10,000 -0- -0- Rebate $ 91,055 $91,055 $ 91,055 mn l7 non an:.°-- @l^_^.°5: There were no tracts annexed into Landscape Main tenance DisU7ct No. 6 during fiscal yeaz 1989/90. Q1Q Y~Y as Fiscat Yeaz 1990/91 Projected 1990/91 Expenditures Assmt. Administration Overhead Maintenance /Operations Vehicle Malnt./Operations Contingency-Trees Trail Maintenance Contract -Vandalism Contract -Routine Tree Maint./Contract Admin. Capital Water Electric Irrigation Restoration Reserve Carryover (Pazk Site) $ 4,684 $ 738 $ 3,000 $ 1.000 $ 3,000 $ 1,077 $ 9,000 .4,7.'1.7.:ifitl $ 19,440 -0- $ 15,923 $ 3,000 -0- $107,991 $396,213 It is estimated there will 1171 assessment units within this district dunng 1990/91. After review of possible expenditures and assessment receintc. and nrojected coats. the aageagmenf ratr will remain ai `.B1AR Otl 1990/91 Assessment Rate 1171 x $195.00 $228,345 89/90 Bud. Carryover = $ 59,877 Reserved Can;~over $107,991 $396,213 `s ~_ ~.. a ;a,. v~ u,~~'.: ~t~::rc- J3VV 5250 5200 5150 <1 /~/1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 --v-- Assessment Ramos 07/08 80/89 89/90 90/91 Fiscal Year ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (ETIWANDA NORTH) FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMi'[ir.D BY: SPECiAi. DiSTRIc''T5 AllMINIS"C12ATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Ettwanda North) Fiscal Year 1990/81 The 1990/91 annual rennrf fnr Tandcranr Maintrnanrn nistNCt N~. ? (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I. Division 5 of the Streets and Hfghways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting AM of 1972). This report provides information on protected costs for fiscal year 1990/91. The protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide quality landscaping at the lowest assessment rate. Assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, se.~victng and restoration of parkways with the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 is considered of general benefit to all areas fn the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated fn this report. _ rcp,.., - _.. replacement of all or any part of any improvement,~providing for~the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or intury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish. debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and grafllu removal from walls Immediately adtacent to [he cultivated azeas. Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. S _.'J Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 was formed during fYscal yeaz 1989/90. No expenses have been Incurred. The district was formed on June 21, 1989. The following tracts have been annexed into this district: ANNEXED AUGUST 2, 1989 TRACT 72462 27 UNITS ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989 TRACT 12659-I 138 UNITS :itd.`,i iGoiU 87 UNIT5 ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989 TRACT 13566-1 112 UNITS TRACT 13566-2 TRACT 13566-3 TRACT 13566-4 ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989 TRACT 13565-1 132 UNITS TRACT 13565-2 TRACT 13565-3 '1'KACT 13565-4 PROJECTED 1990/91 EXPENDITURES Assmt. Administration $ 2,880 Overhead $ 432 Maintenance/Operations $ 3,000 Veh. Ma1nt./OperatOns $ 1,500 Contingency -Trees $ 3,000 Trail Maintenance $ 1,078 Contract • Vandalism $ 2,565 Contract -Routine $1 9,955 Tree Mafnt./Contract Adm. $ 5,094 Water $13, 796 Electric $ 700 $54,000 It 1s estimated there will be 72U assessment units within Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 during fiscal yeaz 1990/91. To cover the proposed expenditures the assessment rate will be $75.00 720 A.U. x $75.00 $54,000 ~a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE~/DLSTRICT N0.7 ANNEXATION: ~' Z-$q sUWIT wIwVC i I . ~ ml j n .W ~~~ W~ a _ d - _, o • ~ • , • ~ R 9M5T~ • MNL ~ Y . A i R ~Rf 1 ~ .~ I C l ~ l I I~i 1. GRUUUn[dVE¢ (s.F QrE (wMM~T tee) TAIL • (6NrT P.L) ~e~euv ~ ~ CITY MY~l T~~4C0 ~Q~J! i • yr¢!iT L~N17vi 1 NT City of Rancho Cucamonga rfa~: -1~~2 • ~~ r ~ ~~ .. . ~~ 4 f ASSESSMENT' DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLS7RICT N0.7 ANNEXATTON: i • • ~ ~i • ~ 3 . , l l l l I~I 1 1 V i l l l I~ ~! _IEGiNO FOR COZY MANTENANCE AW6AS ® LWO•Uta Aaa- wuasrtaaw tangy • sTRIaT \Nrls fi~ City of Rancho C_ ucamopga Project: ~Q~~~ .. i_'- ;~, ;,, ..~„ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.7 ANNEXATION: &~_ ----"~'---• ~ I L ~~ _ ,,. ~~ ~~; ~ ~, _ ~1~. III V ~T~~~'la n ~. ~~ -~"I' I ` I' I~ x City of Rancho camon a s Project: 7 ~'. ;.. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ANNEXATION: ~~!~_ `u; LEGEND CITY MAM'1TAINED AIEA9 Q~ i~tT11~~M TA\Il City of Rancho Cucamon Project: 'j'~,(~/ i A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIIVTENANCE.DaLSTRICT N0.7 ~ ANNEXATION: ID •7.9q ~ 32 ~ 33 3 4 IEIR ~ 3s ~', :. cou 28 29 37 27 38 zs ~ ao 3s 2s 11 to LA 24 12 t ~ 41 42 23 13 = 8 w^ 22 14 0 7 44 f 21 18 8 46 20 It 1. 1716 5 4 3 2 1 46 SN RI 1 E 47 4t 4t 60 51 02 '~3 64 68 O6 67 jj ' 1 ^ CIT`I MM1T111[0 ARA3 ® ~~RTw~t Jh~ City of Rancho Cucamon a r' Prom: ~7~../~~ii3 N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAIlVTENANCE DISTRICT N0.7 ~ ANNEXATION: I I ' I ' ~' p r/~ ~ 2 JI y ~, Ib h ~ ~ ~ Z2 L / s: ;w ° ~ t a x ~ ~ w .r ~ /7 3 n ,ir v ~ a s d ~ N , ~~ y ~ ~ .Lt // ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N city of Rancho c_ ucamonga Project: N ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DCLSTpRICT N0.7 ANAIEXATION: ~ ~ - ~ - d -I I ~ ~'~\~ i ~ ~, zs ~ 1s i' \~ / ZF ~ - ai - ss ~,/` .sz z: ~e ~ z/ ~ ~~ .a as is 31 ie i! D\ 1 S y y 0• 1 L ~ .30 ~ ~ /S / i 1 y /a }Lj'. i 1 t z: Y n r s 1 s! i9 ' ~ 1 ., u • 9'r 1 :~ 1 /0 1 / ~0 si 1 ~ 1 N s 1 ~ /1 /3 ~ ~ 1 3 y 1 '~ /Y 1 f 1 o w ~ ,n ~ e ' b 4LG[NO P~ilhuy ® ~Y T~M~ ~ CITY WMT~MK0+11Vf ~ tarMtt r1~~ N Ciry of Ranch-o~ Cpu~c~a.m~yoKnga Project: ""f"°" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ANNEXA710N: ~~~1-~ N N~lMM m ~-~ r~u- ~7 CITY MI~MITMN[0 ~I~I~» ~ f ~ ft*ltr T1~~ ,~`(• City of Rancho Cucamon Project: ' ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT ~ ~ ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 ~ (ETIWANDA SOUTY~ I I i FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I i SUBMiTTEU 13Y: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (EUwanda South) Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The 1990/91 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (Etiwanda South) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Artlcie 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report provides information on protected costs for fiscal year 1990/91. The protected costs are used to establish the necessary assessment rate to provide quahty landscaping at the lowest assessment rate. Assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of parkways within the district. The maintenance of Landscape Maintenance Dlstrmt No. i3 is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and the cost shall be divided as indicated in this report. Detailed maintenance activities Include the repair, removal or replacement of all or anv part of anV Improvement. orovidln¢ for the Hfe. growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, trimmtrig, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or 1nJury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair and graffiti removal from walls immediately adJacent to the cultivated areas. Parkway improvements within Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 were constructed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development aid as approved by the Engineering Division. ~: :, Review of Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 was formed during Uscal year 1989/90. The district was formed on September 20, 1989 with Tract No. 13063. This tract has 73 assessment units. No other developments have been annexed to date. PRWECTED 1990191 EXPENDITURES Assm[. Adm1n. $ 292 Overhead _0_ Maintenance/Operations $1 ,193 Vah. Mal..^.t. 1(h>eratinna $ ?F Contingency -Trees $ 5pp Contract -Vandalism $ 510 Contract -Routine $3 .402 Tree Mafnt./Contract Adm. $ 213 Water $ 650 Electric $ 150 $6.935 ,^~<_ It is estimated there will be 73 assessment units within Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 durin0 fiscal vear 7980/A1 Tn rnonr ~tiP protected expenditures the assessment rate will be $95.00. 73 A.U. x $95.00 = $6,935 ''z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6. 1990 1b; Mayor. Members of Clty Couned & C1ty Manager FROM; Jem 8. Fulwood. Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO AFYKUVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3. 4, 5 AND 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 RSrr)MMENPA??ON. It 4s recommended that City Council hold the Pubbc Hearing, and approve the Engmeer's Reports and Resolution eatabbshing [he assessment rates for Street Wghtlng Maintenance Dtstrkt Nos. 1, 2, 9, 4, 5 and 8. HA K ,RO ND/ N tY 1 Through detailed momtortng of revenue and expenditures over [he pas[ four years patterns have developed. Lighting Dtstne[s 2 through 6 are basically the same type of districts and history, mdlcates the assessment rate will ultima[ety level out at approslmately $20.00 and then increase based on In0atlonary pressures. „ .::.g D......~...,... ....,..o. This district has had a mte of $7.52 per umt for four years. With protected Southern California Edison Co. rate Increases it Is recommended the assessment rate be inereascd to $9.25 per umt. 'Oils will provide su8lclent funding for fiscal year 1990/91. Lighting District No. 2 -Local The reearuveuded asscasmem rate wW remain al $20.00 per unit. This w111 provide su[Ticlent funding and will allow a rebate of approximately $17.75 per parcel. The rebate consists of remaittbtg funds . Lighting D1striM No. 3 - Victoria The r_commended aascasment rate vrill remain at $20.00 per unit. This will nrwide sufficient funding. A rebate of approximately $11.00 per unfl will OCCUr Crom remaining funds. Ughting DlsMet No. 4 • Terta Vlata The mommended assessment rate will remain at $20.00 per unit Remaining funds will allow a rebate of approxlmeley $ 47,00 per unit. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 6, 1990 Page 2 Ltgt!ttng District No. 5 - Caryn The mommended assessnent rate will remain at $20.00. Excess Cunds ace re9eMNe of an error ]n last year's assessments The assessmett should have been $20.00, however, a charge of $35.00 was inconeMly assessed. A rebate of appratmnately $44.00 per umt will be possible. Ltghthtg District No. 6 - Commercial/Industrial The mommended assessment me w81 remain at $20.00 per acre. This w91 provide sutHcient funding for 1890/91. As of this date we have not melved anv of Southern cal!(nrn!a F.d!sn^.'° forme; ~4-cet li&1;. rare csccmates. the assessment rates w91 provide sufficient funds for these possible rate utcreases. spectfully su tied, [_ --~~' erry H. Fuhvood Deputy Clty Manager JBF:Jmf Attachments 18a ~. .... >~,T s4/es es/es 86/87 87/88 86/89 68/90 90/91 Stn:et Light Maintenance $9.64 $6.91 $7.52 $7.52 $7.52 $7.52 $9.25 District l Street Light Maintenance $36.22 $31.23 $25.00 $23.00 $20.00 $20.00 District 2 Street Wght Maintenance $48.65 $48.03 $35.00 $27.00 $20.00 $20.00 DISUtct 3 Street Light Maintenance $27.14 $32.21 $25.00 $22.00 $20.00 $20.00 District 4 Street Light Maintenance $38.50 $35,00 $35.00 $20.00 District 5 Street Light Maintenance $25.00 $20.00 $20.00 District 6 18~ ~. A- RESOLUTION NO. 9U , \ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 PL'RSL.4NT TO THE LANDSCAPE A.'VD LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3. 4, 5 AND 6 Wtii:.&r.eti~, ilia ~iiy i;uw,cu ui [ne wry of xancho Cucamonga oio on the 2nd day of May, 1990, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 90-185 to order the therein described work in connection with Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 which Resolution of tnten6on No. 90-185 was duly and legally ppublished in the time, form and manner as requited by law, shown by the a6idavlt of PubhcaUon of said Resoluton of Intention on (Ile in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and conetdered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning tlxe JurtsdicUOn facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 for the Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 90-185, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Year 1990/91 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. IRT si, ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL) FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CP1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMTII'ED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineers Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Artenal Streets Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) 1s prepazed in compflance with the requirement of Article =F, L.iaaj~iea i, Divieauaa U vi uac ou cc L9 anti iiiguwnys %utie, oinir ui inuiwaain (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the protected expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 to determine annual assessments, The assessment will be used to furnish services and matertals for the ordinary and usual maintenance as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas 1n the District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumfnatlon of the subtect area. Street lights were individual subdivisions. conditions of approval Engineering Division. Assmt. Admin. Overhead Capital Expend. Electric Contract Serv. constructed and installed by the developers of the The plans and street lights aze as stipulated 1n the for each development and as approved by the Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 I2evtew 89/90 Budget $ 69.752 $ 2,751 $ 13,006° $ 49,000 $ 4.172 As of 2/28/90 $ 69,752 -0- -6- $ 35.666 Protected 6/30/90 $ 69,752 $ 2.751 -0- $ 53,496 $ 3.120 $138,875 $107,233 $129,119 •Low bid was $2000 over budget. Protect not awarded, During fiscal year 1989/90 the following tracts and lights were annexed Into Street Lighllng Maintenance District No. 1: ANNEXED APRIL 19, 1989 TRACT 12462 27 ASSMT. UNITS ANNEXED MAY 3, 1989 TRACT 12420 114 ASSMT. UNITS ANNEXED MAY 17, 1959 PM 12057 3.62 ASSMT. UNITS ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989 DR 88-07 1 ASSMT UNIT TRACT 13359 6 ASSMT UN[TS ANNEXED JUNE 21, 1989 DR 88-25 3 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED JULY 5. 1989 PM 11891 262.06 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED AUGUST 2, 1989 PM 12218 3 ASSMT UN[TS ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989 PM 599ti 4 ASJM'1' UNl'IJ ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 PM 11852 22 ASSMT UNITS PM 12573 2 ASSMT UNITS CUP 87-05 10 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13873 124 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 20,1989 DR 87-48 5.72 ASSMT UN[TS MDR 89-07 7.64 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13565-1 TO 4 132 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989 TRACT 13566-I TO 3 112 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13737 12 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 12820 16 ASSMT UNITS PM 11835 2 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13304 59 ASSMT UNITS DR 88-21 5 ASSMT UNITS DR 88-14 5.6 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 18, 1989 DR 57-34 3 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13810 7 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989 DR 89-10 9.2 ASSMT UNITS PM 11685 3 ASSMT UNITS PM 12121 15.56 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13930 23 ASSMT UNITS DR 88-43 3.56 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 15, 1989 TRACT 73662 29 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13813 6 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1989 PM 9431 5.88 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 14121 47 ASSMT UNITS DR 88-32 3.1 ASSMT UNi2'S DR 88-29 4.68 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990 DR 88-13 12.76 ASSMT UNITS CUP 87-29 7.16 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13851 61 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 23621 7 ASSMT UNITS ANNL~'XED !''EN1fUA1tY '/. 19~JU DR 88-19 12.08 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13886 23 ASSMT UNITS PM 11394 18.74 ASSMT UNITS PM 12058 7.58 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990 TRACT 13664 & -1 28 ASSMT UNITS DR 88-11 .80 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED MARCH 7, 1990 TRACT 13890-1 & -2 166 ASSMT UNITS ;.'. ar: ii. PROJECTED 1990/91 EXPENDITURES Assmt. Admin. $ 57,760 Overhead $ 3.155 Electric $ 58.215 Unanticipated rate increase $ 1,440 Capttalexpendltures $ 13.000 $133,570 PROJECTED REVENUE 14440 A.U. x $9.25 = $133,570 A protected $46,185 1989/90 carryover will fund this district until assessments are received In January, 1991. CTPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA gts'sst fight Maintsnantx Ellateict No. 1 slo S9 Se B4/BS 85/98 88/87 87/88 88/B9 89/90 90/91 Si Fowl Yw ~~ Aasensment Ratm tr 8:+*. . ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIlVTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATTON: ~ - 19-g'~ war ~~ (-~ I I. fr'~1 ~ N - I tl F ~~~yyy ~~ a 4 A W • n ~ y ~ w • ~ a4sn • ww[ a • w r ~ w • ~ • a N City of Rancho ucamo~a Project: 1. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGFiT'II~IG MAINTINANCECcDISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATTON: ,5' 3-Pq LCO[ND Ph l111((T LIGHT • lT11TfT Tlltl ~f11[[T TA[[[ our I r i r f~NTU li AWY( .Iw•eurotu ![v[xiH TT LYtALYTYI YANTNI ~ H!ttY•M ~vf t AYYA.vTUa< _~ (IMTM (TIK[ N City of Rancho Cucamonga Roject: ~~D III~~~ ~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIlVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATTON: ~ I~I'S~I ~ ~ V Q P. M. No. /2057 i I fcnon _~~ 1 ~\ Biy~ Gty ~ A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTII~IG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~' 7' B9 '~-- 1 °' ( 1 sr fie' l r I h ^.,~ ,.a~is~ Iwa~+~ A/ AIaAi~QI 17 1~y M,~.Aw.rl I I 2 P.,.~~ 9~/sl.7o x '~~ `"~ shy ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~o ' 7' ~GI i ~~ ~~ y i ~ ivy J~aaE ~. \ ~ a ~\ t iZ ~I J r I City of Rancho C~ ~ on~a Project: ~'Y"r~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAEVTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXAITON: ~/ 1I~g9 I i ~.~I I; _ I i -~.uwt- ~ III ~ _~ SITE 'i ~ ~ ~ ':~~ ~~ ..~ \~~ ~ ~~~ u ~.... .-, -~ -- ~ -~tA,TP TE-~4NT !a!S ~~ ._ . TH ST _ ~~ I a ~ ~; ~, x Cary z• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAEVTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: '/~~•~q / C/L ARROW ROUTE ~. 1 i ~.rrr • -OL t7 ICL If I0. 11 -q 10 4Cl • • ~'r r •.w r +~ r +a• r gal r /Ol t n ~.r r _ rot 1 ~ _ ~' '_ ..rr ~- _ I. •.r r ~Ol ti -af U a.r r 1•./A r DEL ~ ~ 1.•M r• ~i (•OL It • •..1 r rw ~ • -a 1• Iol ~ ~ ~ • ••• ~' -et • L~ b /4 ~f ~.NI r 4a~ •A N.+ ~ ~. !1 /Ol b M• r N.+ r i i - Tti~%IdYRMI~. !x•117{ •~~••~•••• •7~OT 7R~ MMNT. ~f City of Rancho ucam >~~' Project ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHIIlVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: I _ _ NINETEENTN- 9TIIEET T I a7L:L~ ~) I '7 r L, - ~~ I 1 ~ I~~ ~ n ~~ I-I ..om~^, i I~ O~f! iC~ ~ . II ` 1 I tLV` i.l I~r ~.:ti-:c. ,, I ~ __~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ I I~ I II ~ I ~~~ I I ~ i -~` ~ TNACT NO 9 t10 n.e. l iixe- City ~ Rancho~~~'~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIVG MAINTENANCEaDIASTRICT NO. i ANNEXATION: ~~~~' wRSON wFNUf _ ~ 2..... _. .. :. ..---- _ _ .,. .. .. - - - < m . p P _ . D m 2 - -- .... .__ __ _ .._. ~ _...... " t _ - -- . .. m ~.. .---...-_ - ~ + .. .._ . pOH?1 i frt R/Vlr ~. _. ~:.:.. 'cf i' is~eT G/dit~'f City of Rancho ucamonga _ Pro)ect: f~~ t G ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: R ~ ~ - Rq - -~ --~.---.-.i_..1 l._---•-•-- - ------ - ~ ^oua ~ - 6 ~~{, ~ ~ ~ ~i w~ u ~',I ~ Y Y r Y Y ~a tYY K YYl r~ r~ Y ~® ~ _' n~n~./~~YY~Yn , Imo. W Y . Y N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: ~1/,~L ~^ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AxxExATlox: 9-b-84 ,....... I ..... - ~. I 1 ~,'- i _._ ~ ~ ~~. x City ~ Rancho ucamon~ ~~ Project a, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIG_T-ITING MAINTE/N~ANCE DLSATRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: 9- ~' A 4 I ~ H!u'tii.fiiB i fIT[ v/CT'OMI ST W • O >t t 3 ti w slsrtier sr. x City of Rancho Cu a sf . -y~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGH'ITNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNE7CATION: 9 b-89 -)~ ~Q_-------' ~ -~LJ~ L` I t l i 1~~~. ~ - fi--- 1 ~' I~ ~ ~1 1%1 11V I~SQJiI I j; ~ a,~ f ~~ ~d31'J9 /,)0- X3:3 "0'4;-~i1 ~ - ~ n I I, ~ \ /~ f tl ; , ;! 1 jai ' /'~~ __ - ~ ,;.~...._- ate, ~~~~\~ \4 ~ ~ lia ,, f ~ 1 I i ~ ~~~ fAN A /Yf1 ~ ~' lv I i II. J!;(J f71'11A~19A C~iQ9Y 1,~'ll3 ~;;~ j ~ ~ Tw I it iU i i I 'T, ( -z--~ -_-_~~- li 3 I Tavn*nn ~'' ~~~r ~_11~f.~T•'7JR14 ,• 2^3 ,i; yY ~~rwn. 1 ~Ar~Ar ~~~ 7 City of Rancho~ucam~n¢ /a I'rojeck ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~' 2~ "~ I i CRIfT//~ ~yf! / fyTTtl lfa~-~ ~ti _ ff rpsrlrr!!l =~~.1- ~~- '`L ;~~erulr c/wlr ~~- ~ - ~ lmruc curl~anu; --4- ~ .~ L ~-'~~-~r- ~TAfr nerd ~ I !^' I _-+'malwwr .~ I +ar r twa rwrr srr!!r I I I .vr-mr-oil-n ;t t ~~ ~I I~ N City of Rancho Cucam ryga Project: ~~1~11 rk Gti ~': Y.'. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAAITEANANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: T';~•84 NIN7N lTRffT ::~~ s I ~ I _ __ W i t N~O~ QIIf- 1~0 ' IYCf7. I I w' .__ ...... ._ ~ Ap ~~~~~ • ! Nh Rlrf (~ ~ a (- i . ._-~ ~~ L~L ~Y"if4 ~ ' qM~ ~Y~WI~ a~f ~r ~ o~ ~~ ~ f4 l ~ _. 1 s M/ffl 1 i 1 r Cityp ~ CucamQn~~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET I.iGHTAIG MAIlVTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~-2Q-Qq t ~~ ~ ze r ~ ~n \ rt u ~ n ~ zz ~ ~ ea y ~ m s a n ~ a ie a .d rr s ~ n ~ ~ r i ~ ~ f A L~ 9 ,~y ~ ~~ io _ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 3 L~ ~ ! ~ f 7 i LLGLNO Np~~M ~ uner~er Tru- ~ an wwnrKp erns y ~~ r*~wte ~s~ T N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project:'l~,~j UUUIII 'a, ASSESSMENT DL\GRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: q-20-g9 ~ ,~'~\w I ~ ~~ =a , 19 ~ ZS \ P. _ /_ fa ~~ 1~/ i JS 11 i0 r 1/ ~~ Q ~ SG i1 \\ /9 ~ sy in k e• ~ 3/ /f / _ ~ i n ~ Y n? ~ s ~ ~ ~ s~ ~ ss ~ i~ tis.• .~ , y ~. ~ in \ ~ ~ si t ~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ *~ ~ so ~ if z u n (~ ~ , a is s ~ ~ * i~ ~ • ,r d a t ~ ~ is ~ A Mp+-,M , Lp Mrr~r t~u- j ~ GfY IYMIMIILO A1~-! T City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: iY_l_'j51oS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTEAANA--N_C_E DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: el~i~0'~ I e I ~ _ o I ~ ~. _ io ' i~ ~ \ ii u : u ~ n si ~ So ~ se ~ ~~ ~ ,s irr / io ~ ~ r ~ r I ~~ '"t ~ ~ sr I *i ~ ~ ~ '+ IM~~Aq m ~ra•rfru- ~! ® CITY MAMTYIi[D AItAS J~ ~ ~~R ~t~ Ciry of Ranc2to cam nga , Project ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGH'I1NG MAINT'INANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: I D• ~il• 8 9 I ~ ~ I I 2 3 4 s 8 7 8 9 10 II 12 i3 ~ S ly ss 42 41 ~ IS s4 X43 39 40 0 le s3 ~ 44 I ~ 17 s2 ~ as c ~~~ le sl 46 3? 37 19 so 47 3s m 20 49 4e 3e zI ~ zz 34 Ross 33 32 COURT 24 23 31 2S LEGEND C{TY M4INTAINED AIEAS `;~ N6TIO\M T11\1V 2e ® M~O~AN 27 ® srsKlt iwai 2e 29 City 1~ o u ga_ 0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STTtEET LIGHTII~IG MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATTON: IO~d'A~ 32 33 31 30 34 IER N 35 CVY 1 36 28 29 37 27 3e za 40 39 25 II 10 24 12 9 LA 41 42 23 13 Z 5 43 ~ ~ '" ~ 44 21 15 6 45 20 t9 1• 17 16~ 5 4 3 2 1 46 ~ r!1 R I H 47 40 49 50 51 82 53 54 65 56 57 GTY MAMAN[D AItA! CityPr ~ ian ~n r~ ASSESSMENT D~ANG~DLTRICT NO.1 STREET LIGI-ITE~G MAINTE~N~_A~~ ANNEXATION: i;.. .~ ~' i ~ ,. , „' ~. ..~,._~.,,iu~i f ~f~_._____ _ _ _ __ ___~__ i~ ~ 1 Illy _~l_ _i_~.- 1 i I1 I ~i _ 1~1 1 ~, _- ~~~ I 7 r :..+ ' ~y~ nuw~ AWf afWX I i ~'- v ]I~~ M !VN LOS ~-I~MW -JJJ L',.~. Imo. ~L ~ I fY 4fM cry of R~~nQ c~~7ga rco}ecc: ~~~ bit s ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: IO' q' - ~j' A i~ ~+'v: e1L w1 °1 ' m,, j i ~II °4~I I ~I I ,3 I it i 't~'I ~ icY i~~auuu ~ --sa~r-.~. c'C~~L L~_ ,i-' ',1 - ~ - -~;~I ~,~ ~,I ote/nm ~emwv enMr of w.' Fi l F ~ ~' -KLL • rv >r0t nit H/N LGrI R-1-Y00 I ~ tat ~•~ww I tot orr ~~ µ tt+wt crn• i N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga r~o;~r-rs~aSao :r: ,_~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DAI/S~TRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ID'4'S3g ~,, ~ .~ t.i ~~ ? j ';i.,~4 ! y~ 5,1; G:- J ~J/~ '~ - ` ~~ ~•.. , ~j . i ~~-~Sy Wy v ~ i~ .~ ~ ~, v, a, Iri \~ C i -I, ',, e```,~~ R \~~I ~~ ~ Y" i i ii'11 ~ ", . -s ~ :w~ I~~e.s,.-T.,~.:.~, L~ BA$EUNQ q0. ~ _ _ N City of Rancho Cucamonga ProjeM: ~J,-~$ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AxNExATION: i(Q-4/-g9 ~ ~ -- ~~ "°,~,-~ °aw' "~----_ - oiuve City of Rancho I~oJeCt: ~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIVG MAINTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATTON: lO-A~-~R ~' i j l ~~ ~ i i _ 4~% Shttf QLEXCUS ILEX-Ho[LY aAiC - 6 c'A. 89C>r 9~k sf. N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Project: 1~G~1 ASSESSME'VT DIAGRAM S1REEf LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ID•~$1_ 19TH S771FEt I I 1 I ~$~ ~~ ~~~ 1' .~ f ! ~~ .~ i f ~ x c;Iy or is~a~o c~~ ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION: [p•M•A~I ..• ., ..r. •si. s' .. • _~ i I MEDICAL BLDG. i ~ DR 07-3~{ e • • • O O 0 .. .. City~l~ oC~~B~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTINANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: /dam/~~ .FAV L' ~. _ h s k ~ y. • iy ~, ~ M O v " ~ N/LLS/DE 7te~i Cityo~l~ oCu o ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET' IdGH1'II+JG MAIIVTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i ANNEXATION: JI- I-B9 ~M ~r~rr - fff/Di7~itt:7liir~ ~I wKa t ro~aa • I I 1 1~ i ~~! City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: Q~l+b ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTWG MAINTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: 1~' I~d4 2 "' ~•~ _ D ..:.: ~ F .:~: -,- .. s ~ -4• ~ v ~' - - e~~ ~± :~ y,- ~-~-, a / _, ~ L N ~'~~ x City of Rancho Cucamon a Project: ~/~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ,l~hg~ MI ~~ 1i i ~~ - n4'I ~I 1 Ii ~' I ~~ •~ I N ~j ~I ~~ AM~(1{ ! .~ ~ I a' _ ~ ; .,.. ,.~ 1~~~..~,.. I ~ '~h ~ i+ ~, v ~, r~ ~ ' ~i i! ,.i h 'w'•~iR ~ D ~" 1~~ •SY• i . ' ,. 1~,., .n ~ -~ m~ , +.. :.AS~" W~U ~ ~r o r. 1 rx Ciry of Rancho ucamon Z' Project: ASSESSMENT DWGRAM STREET LIGHT<lVG MAINTENANCE DIAASTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: IO- ~~87 I w, .buy c J _ ~ 8 . ~ ~ re 1` ~ s i ~X~ u r ~ 1 r: j x City ~ oo C~~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ STREET LIGIiTING MAINTENANCE/DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~I~~`,~7 i ~~ ~ '~ ~ sirE '; ~ _.~ \ `.~~ ~. '~ ~n•tww- ~ ~ ~~ ~ X b1Uw/ L'q'tt~ h~ c~ry~Rancho~`~g%13 '^ ~o~ ASSESSMIIVT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIlV'1'ENANCE D~IISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATTON: ~I~ 15'94 p GtsC _ c..VS ~ea.c ~ ~. , --~ - r ~ _ -~~_ i . ~ -, ~ , I, ~~ . ~ r -1 i I ~ ~ 3 ~~ , AIL ~ ~ -~ 1 ~, i~ 5 ,i ~ 4 ~----~. ~` ~~ ~, e S~W~I 4~~ I. ~ 1 ~ ~ ( I 4 ~o 4.--J C_L-_ ~ ,L , /I Isar ~ ~ ~ p.nr w ~ +- JIf N M a L 11 i! N h t . .. City of 1~ o ucam ga Z. Pro ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D[ISTgRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~' I S' b 1 1 19Lh s1RtE1' PFPPPRIOCE COURT ~ ~ LOf 2 \ ' [.OT 3 ~ LOT < LOT 5 I LOT 6 xQ.4Mn AYL. \ ~ I I BEPPEIIIOOL LANG LOGIIiI ~~, ~8'lnm'I LID1R N City of Rancho Cu onga Project:'r$ ;~~. ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: I a ~~~~_ ` ~( HILLSIDE p0A0 I /I . ~~ i w x a I WI W NI 2 4 3 J A iy~ m l iA~ {.. City of Rancho ucamon ~' Project: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHIIIVG MAINTENANCE DISTR[CT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: , Z •~_ ~~ JYL~.. ~y r ~ qr~ \. 15 MD.RCT 91T~ yCTENTiON I ; ~ ~ BASIN finl, u; ~~ ~. i f I _f ~f City of Rancho C_ _caig~ong~ Project: ~rAl+ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGI-T17NG MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: /2w!.~ b9 / h YILIIRlI .nwt !/ w'~wll 1 ~. ! S 1 ! 1 ~ i i ! ` _ _ ~. .. ..~ o ~ ~~ _ ., ~! -~- }' ~ ~ _ 1 v w u w~ w w T ~ G ~ ~! , R 6 !~ w ~ ~ ; a p x ~ ~! .. t 9 ~. , . o t N w a N M AN ry W 7~ ~ ~ , ` ~ ~ ! , ~ w n n. ww •• , ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~9` .w_1~ u a f ~,~~ n n a n ! r I I V ~ r 4 ! 1 nlrw wr j -~ ~ x ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: 12 ~[N S4 FtFTti S7REEf ~~~ 1 ~~ r ~ "f I I I fN AT J AT oI~I~I~I~I1 I~~1I T~ 1l O YItANffOgli R 3 Z ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ~~ ~, fw i ~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ (ffY ~ ~NM pl9L NR ~~ • •AWY T~~ asw ~ ~ ~~ 4~tP L ~ City of Rancho C_ ~calnpn~9 Project: ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: I ~3~ 4`L_ i ~ '~ ~ a_~_~_rt__._n_ n ~ ~ ~ e v. a~ 'I ~ h u u v v v-v .-v.-n- ~n I ~ L n~_ ~ ~Ir fit- .~~- ~~~, ~~ ~_~ +- ~ ~- a ~ ~ _ ~, ~ ~ I~ ~~~~~~~,~I~~ I~ I, o' `~ ~: J City of Rancho Cucam n a I~o~: ~P•~3 N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. I I ANNEXATION: I ~~~4~ I _ ~«.~.~ ee.~.~ I _ ~ -~._-..~_ - __t _ _ J I ccr. I I •i ~ 1 ~ ! 44 a 41 ~ ~ tl~ i I 1~ ~ (1 I I.I I I' r ,~ I ti I in - ~ '~I s. r~1 {- ~ N i i ~ {I i '" ~ ~~ ~'I .~ o ~ iw~' -- _ \ Ciry of Rancho u n Z4 Project: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIJTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~-3~9e - ~ ,.. i ~:i_ ~ n i ~ ~~__ _~ .o~ .: t I f~__. as. a~ "s I ti~ u N 7i ' ,I i7 a zi -~.}~~ u .a w c 7. r :i '`"3- m ~ } ~~ 70 ...• i ~ ~~ a+ T( rs ~ x u ~ 3 ~ ~#~, ~. f r N," ~ ' ~~ r~ .r w i`as ~.^~.w..w.r ~ N ~o ~ r e ~, s ® D OTES CITY I q r• ~ ~ INTAINED ARE ra v D OTES STREET' yyii L GNTS I r.1+.$ i7 rr re 1 Y h~K T ro r ~"^ ~ 7 7 r r',= z-' ~~ ,~ ~ 1 '/ "-`~ wassr .7vsvc~r ~i r i T City of Rancho ucam a / Roject: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET IdGH1•ING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~'~' qQ W i t ALiIORD STREETfW - _ i= ~ W T W ~ S h W ~ W S < O m I •___ 2 > N i W V Z t Q ~ S NILLSIOE ROAD F A f S t W w~Ls-~ AVENUE ~~` J~ City of Rancho CucamoniQ~a PtojECt: Ir ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIYG MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~ • ~• 4e s/TE -y - . ww ~ r0 A/f IaM/ M S~ .I Ta I/M A•A M =1F IMI aa•M • 1 A~• '1' i-. "`e•~ ~~ Ir ~ a - ~© ~ ~~ ~~ q `"/~ i .~abi ~ i cs~y oc~:g~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~ ~ ~ ~ i W LDT t I= W •AnAra oewc ~ _- _~~ -~- LOT a ~IIIt1AT{ DIIIV! TlAC O. la!!• • M o ~ •A11C^L 1 = U •AIIC{L YAK 7fa!• ~ 3 H W BASE LINE ROAD Gty of Rancho Cucamon project '(~~ t~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET' LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: ~•[/•4A LOT / W 2 Pg1V•TC DIIIVE > < l07 7 PlIVAT! OlIV! TRwC O. IJ!!! ^ t J f ~ Pw11Gll l = PwPel~ rwP ~~~a. < U 3 W BASE LINE ROAD City of Rancho Co_ camonga Project: ~//~~ ASSESSMIIVT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTfTVANr1CE DISTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: ~- r -~-((~ - ~. ~ ~__~ I I `~ ,:.".. ~i ''li M (.~i, ~--- .~ jb ; w ~ jt\ ~ ~i ~ EIi ~ir...r) -I ~~. - _ _ ... { .. ~ ~---- ! , 1 •ww.rr ; Ali , }'~ ~ Y ~ GwJ.w)I ~r^~; yrrq'i., ^'i ij. r ~ yip .e ~ ~ ' to :::.. ~I •,{ ~ „I~ ~ ~ 'J I ,~~torOrfl r 1~.. iii I ~ i ice) N City of Ranch Cucamon a II Project: o llNUp1 k#. . ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATTON: L~1.i~4e i IZ ~ ,, . ,s ~ ~ ~t J{// i 1/ -\ I as a ~ v~~ ~a a. , a~ a a °/ ~ ~~"~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I~ ~~~ ~~ T i ;,; , -~ , __, City of Rancho^y~a ~o~n a Project. Tli /) ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D/I~STRICT NO.1 ANNEXATTON: 2 -~~ "/ D . tau "x'Rwisawo ~ve.~ KNgI pex ~- ..•~v. ~ =sue :r :: t i i _ ~ a, a.~.. Z~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~. i i Q .~ ~~ N City of Rancho C camonga 1, Project:'; J j IINI^^ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET ISGHTAIG MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. I ANNEXATION: •y.ge • „ n a a u ,~ i. a < as y n ~ u u a. as is av ~ a s s ~ ~° t~ ~I_ t~ ~ a~ "Ay a 1L c Ciry of Rancho canon a rroect: '~. l~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGH'fEVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION: _~J!~ ~ <f,{~, = a ~"~' i 3 ~ N ~ u )1 ~ s ~ -- ~c ~ ~ ~ » ~ •~ » ~ w » ~ N Y t} ~ Z ~! fi ` ~ w ~ u ._. n k b » ~ as ~f AAAfiOCLLA DR. is its w i~ I~ n m :~ u WIGM~ANO AVC. ~~,~,/ J1A~ Citycho C}~tmong~. J U 1~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (Local Streets) I FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMI'1'1'ED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Local Streets F7sca1 Yeaz 1990/91 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) is nreoared in compliance .+sth thr - ^„+-~_--~^« _o . _ _ Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal yeaz 1989/90 and the projected expenditures for fiscal yeaz 1990/91 to determine annual assessments. The assessment will be used to famish services and matenals for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street tight improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas within the District and costs shall be dftdded as indicated in the body of this report, Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or renlaremPni of all nr any Hart of a,,.. ~.n~....,a...o,.~ ......e.~a... s^r 1L::r=L.~:.t~ _ _ r__.__-_e _„ of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and Installed by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights aze stipulated !n the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of F7sca1 Yeaz 1989/90 89/90 As of Projected Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Acgmi. Adndn. 320,268 $20,268 $20,268 Overhead $ 2,027 -0• $ 2,027 Electric $60,000 $31,233 $53,160 Contract Serv. $ 4.565 $ 1.986 ~ 3.408 $88,860 $53,487 $7b,863 During fiscal yeaz 1989/90 the following developments and lights were annexed into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2: ANNEXED APRIL 19, 1989 TRACT 12462 27 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED MAY 3, 1989 TRACT 12420 114 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989 TRACT 13359 6 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED AUGUST 2, 1989 rivi iiiia 3 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED AUGUST 16, 1989 PM 5996 4 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 PM 12573 2 ASSMT UNITS CUP 87-05 10 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 20, 1989 TRACT 13565-1 TO -4 132 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989 TRACT 13727 12 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 12820 16 ASSMT UNITS DR 87-34 3 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED OCTOBER 18, 1989 TRACT 13810 7 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989 PM 11685 3 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13930 23 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED NOVEMBER 15, 1989 TRACT 13813 6 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1989 PM 9431 5.88 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990 TRACT 13851 61 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13621 7 ASSMT UNITS ANNEXED MARCH 7, 1990 ANNEXED MARCH 7, 1990 TRACT 13890-1 & -2 166 ASSMT UNITS PROJECTED 1990/90 EXPENDITURES Assmt. Admin. $19, 524 Overhead $ 2,327 Electric $65,851 iii~uiiul.iyaia.la :alC 11;Ci L"tl3S o.9:ii $97,620 After review of current expenditures, protected revenue and possible carryover ($130,174) It has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 will remain at $20.00 for fiscal yeaz 1990/91 A portion of the protected carryover funds will be used to support this district until assessments aze received in January. 4881 Assmt. Units x $20.00 $97,620 Carryover $130,174.00 1/2 of 90/91 (43,425.50) $ 86,748.50 The protected surplus of $86,748 will be rebated during 1990/91 providing a rebate of approximately $17.75 per pazcel. The exact amount available for rebating will be determined after 6/30/90. CITY OF RAlYCHO CUCAMONGA Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 $90 S30 S20 S10 85!88 BB/87 87/88 88!89 89!90 90/91 Fbc~l Ypc ~- Assessment Rates ':.a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTINANCE~IDIQSTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATTON: Q'-Iq-E / u + • i n ~ I~ O Y 1~ y7W [1 • n i y ~ w • + ~ wsn awa • w • • ~ ~ • ~ N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Project:'1$,(~2 ~F ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: ~•~~4 ![V[xTN_ _ _ lT xf[T . ` - _~. _1. _ ~ •~° •• ~~ i • S w ~` • l[0[MD 7i1A1~[T T11tlt `I . ~,~ .~ IJ fTll[[T TIKq OUA 1 1 / nlTw 1r Aµq AIIN rIL/A SNLNTM !T a'V•ALY YAUTM ~ ~ ~Kl6M1M !V!. LY AYVA ~ ~ i +~ flxTll itett ~ x City of Rancho ucamon a ['roject: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: JQ ' 7 ' S9' i 'W ~ti ~y i a ~~ W 2 1 .I I N City of Rancho Cucamonga I~oi~: ~1~.9 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LICH'IING MAAITENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: ~•L~B, NINE7fENT11 - ~ _ l711EfT I I ~'i''tfJ.~P. rl ~ ; I J i •~ww~ ~)~ I ' •.~~~JaL~ ~~~t. II~~G~ I ~ ~~~ Z~ ~ p^~i~~ ICI ~ I ~ ~~ I jw r. 7 ~mn ~ 1 o.~AC. ~ _ i l l i I i w~ 11 jai .c' I~~ _ ICI ~i i I! _ ~II~ ~ ~ ~c I I i t• i I i -_- __ ,w x Clty of Rancho u a ProjecC ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D~iSAIRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: ~-I~I~B4 ~riISON wENUQ t A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE~DiISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: 4!e'B! urra f ._ 1 ~ nr•'.r war ~S!(a ~ i ~~~// J~ City of Rancho ~ i ~~ Project: ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTENANCE DLSTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: 4b •~4 I A6/6ML I NO f •~re v~croM1 sr. W a e o `3 ~ I W ~IUe/er sr. fi, c~nq~g~ x Gry ~ aKC_i7'0~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: ~ - ~ r\/~ '-/ _ - L. ' s-~ ~$ n~n~ e a ~ s~ Aa A h ~ 'd 7 fi a • i~ y y v ~ n ~~ ~ '~ a u / ~ b ~ ~ ~ 7 L uacw !~ ~~-M f17 cw~tc~r *ww- ~ qTT IYMTYIfp ~R~ ~ ~~ N City of Rancho Cu_ camonRa Project; -~(~(~ ttt~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIYTINANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: CI'ZO"$q ~~ .l ~\" r' ~ ~~ ~ ~~ Se ~.~ /~ ~ ~. ni / :~ /~ sz a ~o +~ 1/ ii .~ zo is st iv is !\ ~ a/ y ,y e . !~ y 19 ~ p 1 n ~ ._ `~`' z ~~ f~,... 11 SS /7 r ~ I ~ 27 L 13 r ~ ~ // ' t2'.. ~ ~ d- t /v I~ ~ / .r~~ si~ ~ ~ i ~ s ,re /~ ~ ~ / /1 /3 ! tl ~ ~ /7 1 Z ~ ~ N ~ 7 r! ~ a ! d I.L6[IO Nh~MI ® Mir t11M~ ® G7/" YiM7'~1ML0 AID! y ~ ~ ~ Tt~ T^ N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: '~,~'fq~j ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGH'ITNG MAINTINANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: ,~-ZD-89 L[fiRNO ® M~~IM~ ~ ~nnw t~u- awo em wrtttMtc ~iW TC ~~ +..wa~ .wat t City of Rancho C~famsr~$ ~ un Project: '~~f~(~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: /~.~.BO LEGEND GTY MAMIT41NE0 AKA! ~ Msr~~w TIU~- ® NtO~AN ® srwaR w.. City o ~ o ucam nga _ / Pr ~~~ T ~., , , ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTINANCE DIb'TRICT NO, 2 ANNEXATION: Ie•y-84 ~ 32 33 31 30 34 IER N 33 ~ 36 COU 28 29 37 2T 36 ~ 40 39 2Q 11 10 LA 24 12 9 l 41 42 ~ 13 = 0 43 7 is i~ 7 as 21 Ib e 43 20 19 I• 17 ~ 8 4 3 2 1 46 ~~ I E 4T 4d N 00 bl 82 93 04 58 bi 6T urr w~ ai ~ a ® ytwslTT~aa City ~ ~ticam~~}~_~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEYATION: /D'4-89 } m, W~~. 3'~ v.•.a uu ~ ~I i •1~ 1 MI g~, ~ '~ I '-. 'fir-~-'r--~_ j '; I ~~ ill At4 ~ n 1>n~ tYf I ~IIY~ '--I 11pYV fRCL1tY 10(Yfo/W'! ti +VH (W 11.1-~{GO [-y :.il City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: `(1~J8~1y ~~ ~ I t A ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAEVTINANCE DLSTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: /D'4-SI R I ~ i I~{j,~ ~ lira°I~~ ~ ~ II ~~ ~ ~ ~i ~ _J~.l ~~i~ I I~I~ _._ __f I~~I, «. ~~..» lln 3 ~ it ~ ,, ~. 1---~ _ _ -,i. ,~ --- ~; `•' ...... --2~ ..... i i,~ ,;~ ~nre.w Kuvuv ery.r er wv i --~~, i 'N'LL • AI A0~ ly fyN 20f II.1./QO 1~f f-~M~ fPt f•Il ~~ r lur ~o~ t~1 fi, N City of Ranc-ho-~C~u~caym~o~nga Protect: ' >,tirr--v ~d ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTENANCJE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNF,XATTON: ~~1~~q _ .r- n ~~. iu.:' .. • ~ ~ ~_ i MEDICAL ~ ®LOG. i on es ~ . . . . O 0 0 ~~ .. .. g~~ x ~ryProtect:~~77 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGf1TING MAINTENANCE DI~S~ARICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: IDS/S-A4 7 ~ RP ~ ~ 2 k ~y ~ a ~~L _ * V N N/LI..S/~E 7~eewi City of Rancho ca ao Projecp ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: JJ~~~Bq * ':• ~ ~~ , r ~ ~ :. -_ g N •. . _ D ::i:. ~.i.: • ~ ~ .s J _i- P~~r \. . ~ i '1 t '~ ~ ~~ ~\ new ` f ~« ~ .,_ J i N ~ j x STREET LIGHTIIVGES~SMENT DIAGRAM A1n7TElVANCE DISTRICTNO.2 ANNEXA'ITON; /f. /. QO ary oERancho~a~~ f ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DLSTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: JI -I.~~- SCI 19th SMCCt vvpemxcce mtas xu.ww •vt. '~ f/Jf 3 VA' 3 fAf ~ fql' S IOI 6 Lox 1 evemxxs LkR Li~D N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Project: `r$f,~9j3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DIMSTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: J2-brA9 HILLSIDE ROAD x~ ~• W W H ~ N ' • 3 J Y i ~. i ~~ +V CIty Of Rancho C_ U~eR~QAfe, PPO)CCt: ~.uY--~71~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION: /"3~ I :i'^ ~ i _T.. ~' ~0% ~ A i p N ~ ZCtiaa~i 71 N ggg ~Jyw.,f„y3 x ~s~ ~ ;. II ~~ as i .~.'~ ~~ ~f ~ >. h~ m ~s ao .a A+i • ~~ !1 y / a7 ~ i a;r .._ ~. a ~ ~ D OTES CITY I u ~• ~~• ~ INTAINED A w y CL~NOTES STSEET~ L GST3 (~ ~~$ ~ i i w i~ II ~ i3 ~ s ~ a ~~~. o ~ • =~ ~ wnaw wrsvur -i ~ i City of Rancho CucamgnQas' Project: ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 I ANNEXATION: /•s•qe W i I ~ AlMONO STgEET ~ iz W i < ~y ~ _ W '~ N O i N ; _ ~ ~ w«a~Oc ROAD s x r s nsoK ~vcNUc City of Rancho Cu_ camp~¢a' Project ASSESSMENT DL4GRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: ~ • ~• qQ 1 ~~~ r. 2 ~o 7 sr b n M al __ I_ 0 ~ 7L ~ ~ y • ~ ~ !i T ~ ~ y • M Y t1 • Z N ~ 71r ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IL ~ b » ~ i1 i1 MARlCL.LA DR. N Is w n 1. n m tl u NIGN~MID AVC. a1nl City of Rancho C_ yc~n4n~a/ U Project: /~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.2 ANNEXATION: ~~•'Q • w n ~ u ~~ ~. ~ ~: - 1"'W1b w ~ ~• n u ~ N ~ < u ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ n +e s _ ~ ~0 se r» _~ ~ u N i ~ » 7 ~ ~ M ~`c Ciry of Rancho uam Project: •'~'fi 111 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) I FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District ldo. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1990/91 The annual report for Street Lighdng Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) 1s prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Uivisio6 s of uic Succio ac.ci lifghways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report outlines the protected costs for fiscal year 1989/90 and the protected expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91 to determine the necessary assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light Improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company, Maintenance fa considered to be of general benefit to all azeas within the district and cosis shall be divided as Indicated m the body of this report. Detailed malntnr,anrv anHvi9ino a,,.t,..~o a., _......~_ __~_..-, replacement of all or any part of any improvementsyprovlding for the illumination of the subJect azea. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street Ifghts aze as stipulated !n the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1989/90 Review 89/90 As of Projected Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assort. Admin. $13,928 $13,323 $13,928 Overhead $ 1,393 -O- $ 1,393 Electric $48,000 $29,612 $50,780 Contract Serv. ffi $ 1.701 ffi 2.928 $67,231 $45,241 $69,009 Durtng fiscal year 1989/90 the following protects within the Victoria Planned Community were annexed Into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3: ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 TRACT 13873 ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989 PM 11838 ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1989 TRACT 14121 ANNEXED FEBRUARY 7, 1990 TRACT 13886 o~R 1139-~. 62 ASSMT UNITS 2 ASSMT UNITS 47 ASSMT UNITS 23 ASSMT Trtyrme i d.74 A55MT UNI'T'S Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 experienced normal and routfne expendttures during the current Hscal year. Fiscal Year 1990/91 Protected Expendttures Assmt Admin. $ 15, 848 Ovrrheari a 17=2 Electrtc $55,200 Unanticipated increases $ 6.450 $79, 240 After review of expenditures, protected revenue, and protected cazryover funds ($80,764) it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 will remain at $20.00 to per assessment unit. A portion of the protected canyover funds will be used to support this district until the assessments aze received during January. 3962 A.U. x $20.00 = $79,240 Carryover $80, 764 I/2 90/91 Bud. (36,395) $44,3fi9 The protected surplus of $80,764 w111 be rebated during 1990/91 providing a rebate of approximately $11.00 per parcel. The exact amount avallable for rebate wIIl be determined after 6/30/90. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(iA Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 $50 S30 SZG $10 B5l88 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 Fred Year ._.f_ Aasesemenl Retee ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHT'EVG MAIIVTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: 4-d - 89 sou Mt'~~^T~ 4i're lu _i~- ~ j~~~I -- y__ ., ~~,.~:- ~ fi---- ~ i °'~ :~~.1~ I ~ ~~ '~~'~•_~ '. ~i it i71J 131)5) i~lv :~ ~~~~ ~ ~ =, ~ ~ I ~, ~, ~" _ .il`r ! I I ~ I'~~ rM ~ tiro ~' iv I •~ Ili 3! 1(J :'fl'd,1,•1DA COi 0NY !,1,11 ~ I ~ I ~ I it i'.) r I '1~ I it J I fsaQa~ I, ~ ~ I ~. ,. r ~ ~ l~ ~ -~~~1`~7'.7.lLT i .., 7}y1~~'33+~ ~ i7~~Sdi'++Ti~i~o ~~'~ ~ a~ * 9} ~~~ `~~ City~i~ ucemon~3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIJG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATTON: ~~' ~F - S ~;i~'': __` ` ia,a '~~ :°£!~ ~, ~ ~.: J.4r` V ~ ~. ~~~ ~ , ~ / +,~' _ ;tx. '~ ,~%~ ~~ / ~ a g. --~ , Aa, City of Ran Cucamo ga Project: ~ ,1 T a ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTINANCE DLSIRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION: ~Y~w~.~ ~- J Yllll([N (rtYq 't wn 'j"'~"_'_twn.~l_____.~_ I ~ i I ~'~ i I ~ i ww rv9 ..~~~ ` ~_ 1 _ _ w~w• I / 1 1 1 1 1 1 _• I • 1 ~~. Y _._ ( - -~ I. _ Y, 11 ~~'• • ~ S T ~ 11 N~ • .., ~ 11 u.~ •y M M ~ I s I 1 'y •, k '' + i/ S M A AJ x 11 i ` y - I -I ~ mil ~ ~l ~ I ~ I A A ." ~~t =~ ~' ~ ~ n ° 4 ~ ^ d A~ w Y~ I 11 ~ 1~1 A 1 ~~ Y ~O~ C 11 A A A w~r'e A tl i ~ I~I i i ' JAwM ~ ~ 1 e~„~4~a~r _ ~~~ IIt~ ~ //lit ~~ I M/ ~ I _~ ~ ~ c;ey o~ 7~LMl$i 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGH7TNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: ~~7.4G ('~'"~' I tot i 7 W -IIIVA i! olllvt I ~ Z LOT ! {~ ravAn oervt TlAe o. +ottt 0 ~ ~ t ~ rAtou U •wsGR YA- 11il/ S _3 r~' W BASE LINE ROAD " `~~jiBL ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTEANANC/E~DIS'IRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION: L•7•7~J LoT + PIIIVATE 0111V! ~~ i LOT a t11ACi No. +at BASE LINE ROAD O 2 3 F W x Ctty of Ranchos gmop~~ Project: ~M Il / PIIIVAT! OIIIV! ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAIlYTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) ~i-~ FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATTON APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE. CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 Ten•a Vista Planned Communtty Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Communtty) is prepared fn comnltance wirh rnP =;~1=~-~~~~~w ~: ~.uc:c s, Gi~apter I, Division 5 01' the Streets and Highways Code, State of Callfomla (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the protected costs for Rscal yeaz 1989/90 and the protected expenditures for Rscal yeaz 1990/91 to determine the annual assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of sbreet light Improvements as provided by Southern Callfomia Edison Company, Maintenance is considered of general beneRt to all areas in the District and costs shall be divided as hidtcated in the body of this report. Detailed mafnten~nn.. ~...ly.,t7cc iaciudc .h2 ,cyan, ielnuvai or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subtect area. Street lights were constructed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated to the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review 89/90 As of Protected Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assmi. Admin. $11,352 $21,3u2 $I I 35z Overhead $ 1,135 -0- , $ 1 135 Electric $3 3 089 $1 U• 0 , $21 600 Contract Serv. $ : $ 7 8 , $ 1.5Eio $47,276 $22,437 $35,647 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 experienced normal and routine expenditures during the current fiscal year. During fiscal year 1989/90 the following protects were annexed to this district: ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989 TRACT 13304 ANNEXED NOVEMBER I5. 1989 TRACT 13662 ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990 'TRACT 13664 & -I 59 ASSMT UNITS 143 ASSMT UNITS 28 ASSMT UNITS FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 I'roJected Expenditures Assmt Admin. $ 7,124 ^:•cnc~wds i,4ut Electric X27.094 $35,620 After review of current expenditures, protected carryover ($106,156), protected expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 for fiscal yeaz 1990/91 wID remain at $20,00 per assessment un1t. A portion of the projected carryover will be used to fund this dts[rict unt11 assessments aze received in January, Projected Revenue 1781 x $20.00 $35.620 1/2 pf 90/91 $106,156 (17,810) $ 85,346 The projected surplus of $88,346 wlll be rebated during 1990/91 providing a rebate of approximately $49,50 per parcel. The Pxarf an.......« CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA Street I.1ght Maintenance District No. 4 $35 $30 $25 $20 $i5 85/86 88/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 F4Ce1 Yqr -w--- Assessment Ratea ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAIIVTF.NANCE DISTRICT N0.4 ANNEXATION: i ~ C _ --- s i ~i !I i ~Miyw Wfy~ _ ~ 1 DIIIYt i City I~jIChO L'UCYR1QIlys ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 ANNEXATION: J~-/sg~_ 4Y a - ~~ '~ ,~ s a s i ^ r~-_ ~~1 i I J ~ -_- _' ' o Z ~_~ I i ~~ i ,~I, fit, i 3 j I i ~ r----J l., ~~ I~ G ~. I -" W ~ ~ ~ s e ~~I .~ 4~_ _ I ~. '~.I'~ I ~ I /0 y~ /~ 2 ~ ~ I .s i ~-~.~ i~ +s~ ry i~ ~I ~ K ~~ ~ I ~ . .. x City of Rancho Cucam ~~: ~°~,z ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.4 ANNEXATION: • ~ s ~ r-~C " 'A ~~ } ,. ~y ~ ' , ,. , ~„ '~ ' `~ ,; ,~ s 2 I ~'~e h i Y ~ ~ ~ / 's ~% ~ ~ ~ ` !~ \ 1 I i~/~ / i ~ i i V ', / .. i V City aE Rancho 011ga ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT I I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (Catyn Planned Community) FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMI'Cl'ED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINiSTRAT[ON APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street i,lghting Maintenance District No. 5 Caryn Planned Community Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 Tile ariniidi rcpurt fur J1rcC1 iigiiuiig ivlaiiiiciiatit:c Di3'u iii iv. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected costs for fiscal yeaz 1989/90 and the protected expenditures for fiscal yeaz 1990/91 to determine the annual assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all azeas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated m the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement providing for illumination of the subject azea. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights aze as sdpulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Review of Fiscal Year 1989/90 89/90 As of Projected Budget 2/28190 E/30/90 Assmt. Admin. S 3,756 $3,756 $ 3.756 Overhead $ 470 -0- $ 470 Electric ~ 8.000 $2,811 ~ 5,640 Contract Serv. $ 343 $ 150 S 300 $12,569 $6,717 $10,166 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 experienced normal and rou0ne expenditures during the current fiscal year. The following tracts were annexed to the district during 1989/90: ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989 TRACT 13748 102 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13858 61 ASSMT UNITS TRACT 13857 69 ASSMT UNITS Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 Projected Expenditures Assmt. Admin. $ 4,680 Overhead $ 538 Electric $ 8.000 Unanticipated increases $10.182 $23,400 After review of current expenditures, protected carryover ($58,886), protected expenditures and revenue it has been determined that the assessment rate for Street Ltghtlng Maintenance District No. 5 for fiscal year 1990/91 will remain at $20.00. until assessment receipts aze received In January. Protected Revenue 1170 x $20.00 = $23,400 Carryover $58,886 1/2 of 90/91 (6,609) $52,277 The projected surplus of $52,277 will be rebated during 1990/91 providing a rebate of zpprmdmately $44.00 per pazcel. The exact amount avallable for rebate wi;l b2 determined after 8/30/30. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Street Idght Maiatenance INstrict No. 5 S90 $30 $20 S10 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 Flsgl Yeu ~ Axxmment Rates ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM S'CREET IdGI-ITTNG MAINT//ENA~7NCnE DISTRICT NO. 5 ANNEXATION: b` /^759 ~u.yw ~ rr 1~-- i -- t.._ , -~ n ~/.;.. r--;~y I Lots 5d-5!. Tract '3?Sd lj'~ ~ \<./~~, T ~ ~ ~ ~ • Milliken Ave Parkway pct A, Tract t 3857 - nAC I ' ~1r- a r-r ,I ~ iY) I $ I ! I TAT I t ~ /W7Y'I~YS1~^R II lots 9-t t ,Tract 13857 .J ' _ _ ,, ~\ Milliken Ave. Metltan . _.s r 1-. ` I.ol A, Lot 32 E Let 33. Tract t37aB T, ~ I T I •i~ul ~wQ _~Y~~nf N Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Projects I3 Y57 13858 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (Commercial/Iadustrialj FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITCED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISIRATTON APPROVED: RUSSELL MAGUIRE, CI1Y ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Commercial /Industrial Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5, of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). `iivs report deals with the protected costs for fiscal yeaz 1989/90 and the protected expenditures for fiscal yeaz 1990/91 to determine the annual assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual mantenance, operations, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all areas m the district and costs shall be divided as indicate din the body of this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 was established for Commercial and/or Industrial properties mainly within the Industrial and Foothill Specific Plan azeas. Areas included in the work program aze the a is cci iiria is wiuaiaa uac ai~iaw-uf-w ny ua ucaiGunicai cmcuacuin of aia ccin dedicated to the City and are limited to local streets. The work programs excludes matntenance of street lights to rights-of-way of orator streets. Detailed matntenance acUvittes snclude the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the Illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers for the individual protects within the district. The plans and street lights aze as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Yeaz 1989/90 Review ^09/90 As of Projected Budget 2/28/90 6/30/90 Assort. Admin. $2,272 $2,272 $2,272 Overhead $ 284 -0- $ 1.84 Electric ffi •2 $ 800 X2.000 $6,756 $3,072 $4,556 The following protects were annexed to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 during fiscal yeaz 1989/90: ANNEXED MAY 17, 1989 PM 12057 1.81 ACRES ANNEXED JUNE 7, 1989 DR 88-07 5 ACRES ANNEXED JUNE 21, 1989 DR 88-25 1.5 ACRES ANNEXED JULY 5, 1989 riri iiayi LS1.U3 AI:RGS ANNEXED SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 PM 11852 12.51 ACRES ANNEXED SEPI-EMBER 20, 1989 MDR 89-07 3.82 ACRES DR 87-48 2.86 ACRES ANNEXED OCTOBER 4, 1989 DR 88-21 2.27 ACRES DR 88-14 2.80 ACRES AfVNL~XLl) VI:l VISL~K 18, 1`J69 DR 87-34 1.7 ACRES ANNEXED NOVEMBER 1, 1989 DR 89-10 4.6 ACRES DR 88-43 1.78 ACRES PM 12121 7.78 ACRES DR 88-32 1.55 ACRES ANNEXED DECEMBER 6, 1989 OR 88-29 2.34 ACRES ANNEXED JANUARY 3, 1990 DR 88-13 6.38 ACRES CUP 87-29 :1.58 A(:KN:S ANNEXED FEBRUARY 7, 1990 DR 88-19 6.04 ACRES PM 12058 3.79 ACRES ANNEXED FEBRUARY 21, 1990 DR 88-11 .40 ACRES Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 Protected Expenditures Assmt Admin. $ 5,568 Overhead $ 317 Electric $ 4,500 Unanticipated increases 17 $27.840 The rate O: dP.VP.iOnRlerlt and anoanfnnnn of aY~nn~ HrtM~..m ..a•{.:.. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 determine the actual expenditures of energy chazges. It has been determined that an assessment rate of $20.00 per assessment unit will be necessary to cover to protected expenditures and anticipated development. Protected Revenue 1392 A.U. x $20.00 = $27.840 A protected $10,487 w1ll help fund this dtstrlct for a portion of 1990/91. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Strest Ltgdt Mainte~ce Piste3et No. 8 S26 $25 $29 S23 $22 S2i <~n $19 88/89 89/90 90/91 FL~aI Yev ~_ Aieoameni Rahn ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTAIG MAINTINANCE DLSTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATTON: S-17-94 U Q M feron --~~ ~ 1 `\ \` Misr ` ~~ City of Rancho ucamon a 7 Project ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM i STREET LIGHTIlVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: ~~~~ _~_~5'tn-r~' i f I 1 I I ?o. P. m. B09/ ~~ I 1 s; rE ..~ " I ...~ ,,,~....._ w..~ a+~.+~r J"a/ 111/ M .~.I+M.rI I 2 P...~r a 9 ~/s s- ~o ~•• x City of Rancho Cucamonga I~roject ~.~'~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DiS7RICT N0.6 ANNEXATTON: b•II~BQ I 1 ~ ~ i 41I I 1 I .~t- I ~ _~. Sfl'E 'i ~ ~ ~' . '•~~ ~' ~ `\\\\ ~~I U '':; \ \~\ a _~ .. aarlrl•>'EruNT can I _. TM sr _ I ~ I a s"r'' cyst x Ciry of Rancho ucamonga Proeck ~•'~,~ 111 ASSESSMENT' DIAGRAM STT2EET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISIT2ICT N0.6 ANNEXATTON: '~'S'B9 r C/L ARROM ROUTE i i '01 ' • • ra t ~ ra to rs I t rx le ra • s.»/ r • • s.r r i • sar r saw r s.sls r saw r • s~iw~ss IOl 1• s•ew r /al i s.~ r /eL 1 ~ /Ol t• •.~ r Ia./Ie r1 t~ • • I.r re I~i tlat to • ~aM M /~ • • tIK le Nel • la~ssti Mw r s.srsr f0. 1/ • ~~~~ =e f ~.wl r e•e •ee• y~ ~ f eee~'• 'i Y -Cl • ILL it /O 11 4a r N.eY r s.wl r tleb tte f~ p a.ws s~ Iws~ Ir ~~~ 711Y /MM41v/1.M1~ MINNT. ~~~~f e ee e e e e e e e ~tI1rLT 1M/t sMllrr. City of Rancho Cucamonf a Project: ~M /1 X41 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET' ISGHTIIVG MAINTINANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: I ~ caret i ~ ~~1 r r r r r r rs w w ~~ - non --I~C1~ N City of Rancho Cucamonga I~roject, ~~ llN~~ ;:;. «:.. ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTfIdG MAINTIIVAA_NCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION: TZD•BQ MlM1M lfRt~'I ..^.4$ W i - -' J ;~ -~. mar': uw. -.. _.....__... ,~ ~~ ~. ' wm mar r'~ao ; i u --~ ~ ~~rr-;w~ - --.:~.:c.::::z.I fiiii~3ai ~ n a+~rst + ~ x City of Rancho C_ uc~a~onga O~ IRoject l7Jia. ~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGI-ITING MAINTENAANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION: 4-?.A' AR ~~ana cvaa a arrro __ _ ~~ -- " ~ -R ~~7rti/r cart l4it%Al Cfoa/tlarrQ~ ar~.rd f yi wr r *na wwrN u~i~r wn-tN-Ob-rt Qty a~o~ C/i-G7'~8 II~ ` ~. Ik n I.~ ASSESSMENT bIAGRAM STREET LIGHTIIVG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 I p ANNEXATION: I D ~4-hq ~' C, ~ , ~ ~ _i i ~ 9,N~ S/rttf ' T _ • • • QCERCUS S[EX~rYo[LY oAR - G t"A. e9ev 9t~ sf. I N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: DQAS-2~ III~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: lo-,a~q I9TII ~~ ~ I YY~ ~~ ~~~ g`~ I ~ I ~~ I! ~~ I I ~ ~ t~ v x city of Renchoga~ ~;~t: • ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGH'T'ING MAINTENANCE DL5IRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: IG I MEDICAL ' ~ SLOG. OR d7-34 n n n I ~ U U U ~~ x City of Rancho C_ cag~o~~ J T~o;~ $1.7' '1 ASSESSMEWT DIAGRAM S'T'REET LIGHTING MAIIVTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATTON: IM i~ AQ I 1M ~~r~ •• ~~~~~~ •YI.'t ~ IMGZ ~ ~~ ~ ~ x City of Rancho ga ~o ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTINAI~'CE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATTON: III I~ eq I.~fl. _, _ _ e,T~ I '~i _~- ~ vfiC ~. .~ ~ ~. •. I~ ~~ ~ ~~ .,~ Q ~I I ~ ""~ wkh•fpYN1 faA I ~~ s. ~~ ~ a[ f1NW 6qM, l `n~ City of Ranclw ga ~ I, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGF-II7NG MAIlVTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: 1.1.84 ..r S ~ i' i ~ }. N ~~ i ~•, /rNC 1 ~~ t .. i s I • p~....r .. Illl ~Sr..••r M I .;. ~~~ w 1 . ~~ ~ ~ +ww ww ~I . ~r . i i I I~--O el ~I I~S ~ • .. _!! •GMr "0 1~+ ,..r..h 4L~woa w R~ ... _T 1 r. city of Rancho ucamon la' Rojec~ ASSESSMINT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION; _~"b-99 \`+4 ~ i _. ., ~~;~ ~~ 1i2~A ~ li~il ~ ~_ ~ ~. i -- .eo,,acT ~Te DlTENTION I ~ OV g11SIN ~J ~ ~ t I~ I _R ~, u ~~ ~, i _~ r A1~ City of Rancho uca o I, Project: NN ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAAITENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: JrJ.~brB,q HFTN STREET ~~~ r_ ~ r~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~) 0 ~ f TR~Mlt010NR i( urn ~~ ~ F.K I ` MIOVG ~ ~ ,~ i ~l~t!!! 0!C~L M~170JAnlK ® N~Ir iw~y- ~~~~ rTNMf 1MIN 2S rw N R NWt uww s ~. City of Rancho cam ~~ Project: ~,~r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: ~~~~ ~~ i r T'"~r1" I ~~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~. ~~- ~ i i ~ d .a ~_~ ~ - --- f~ City of Rancho Cuc nga~ U Project: /.7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGFITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: ~•`__ •i _ ~ I h.4 ~ JmII Ilpl~ ~ I 1 I i~ a~n,~n P ~. I! n J ~~ ~ ^ L~ '~ j ~~ i; I~ ~ I r i r _ ~ ~ IfI i f~~~~~j~j~s V.~._ T i•1e• I~ City of Rancho ucam Zs Project: 7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGI-TYING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.6 ANNEXATION: '~.•7.4~ 5/TE J ~ taw ~ •~,~.~=tl r•' mt w.• r ~ .~ ~~ •iw ww w f.~ w~ •• • N • ~ 9~j • S 1 ... .., ! e'~ . ----- - ~~ I I-. « ?, t J~: ~~ ~ ~ ~ w~ i '-------- ""t ~i!• ` _ ~ ~~~~~~~___~_ iii I ~ •.i i City of Rancho Cu_ cazyopg ~ s Project: ~~a• 1 lll~~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTAIG MAINTINANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: ~ LI a*- sr I L~~` 111 !.!~Y ~ _ ^".r_._._, wY 'i l _ i I ~ r..flrc• III 'LET-w'.~1~~4.. I „ I rw w..u) \ INYnI I lii ~ --I Y I 1 , 11 .1. ... ~ n,1 sr f / uls..e { '/. ~~~~i ~ j /l i NM.Y / rIf Y.41 1y rr' II I ' I. 1r~• r .. .... .....1~ ~~ ,I-- -- /...., I N City of Rancho Cucamonga Project: P~ I ~1DK$ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTINANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION: ~ - ~ I -gO sru xa~:.w~,ua a~,e. T\\ ~ T1 ~ K~\ \ a sa - + ~w ~~ ~® ~~ ~~ _ ig - ~~ ~~~~ 1 ' i F ~~ ~ ~~~ ; r ~~ ~ t -~ 4 R •~~ N City of Rancho Cucamon,8a Project: ~$_~I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Civil Engineer :aryp•=. i SUBJECT: Approval of Mending Map, Tract No. 14121, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues, submitted by Rhoades Development REC01lEIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Mending Nap, Tract No. 14121, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said aap to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The final map for Tract No. 14121, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues, was apyroved by City Council on December 6, 1989, and was recorded on December 15, 1989. The proposed lot development was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on February 8, 1990 anA annrnvaA by tha Plann/na f'nmmi«inn nn FMrnarv 70. 109(1 Thle approval requires the modification of various existing lot tines which requires the processing of an Amended Tract Map. The developer, Rhoades Development, is submitting the amended map at this time. Respectfu fitted, t RNM: :s Attachment h'; c., RESOLUTION N0. 90 -v} ~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP TRACT N0. 14121 WHEREAS, the Mending Map of Tract No. 14121, consists of 47 lots, subrgitted by Rhoades Devetopnent, Subdivider, located on the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues, has been sudsitted to the City of Rancho Cucanongd by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in canplta~e with Lhe requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, the original Tract Map No. 14121 was approved by the City Council on Oecesber 6; loaa~ ann .e.~e.n~ ,.r neca~.nar f6 10A9; gook 229_ pages 37 through 38; and ' NHEREAS, the developer has made a significant number of changes of lot lines to accosandate specific housing units; and WHEREAS, to sweet the requtreaw!nts established as prerequisite to approval of the Mending Map of said Tract, said Subdivider submits for approval said Mending Map offering for dedication for puD11c use the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that the offers for dedication and the Aawmdin9 nay ueiineacing same are nereoy approved and the City Clerk is authorized t0 execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City a~ record said nap. / ~` / / F rrraK~~ `~~M1 ~acJ ,(.t ... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA axonv~n~a Dmetox .3a ~1'; "l h7g i//~ 9J.~~.ri 1 rrs~: TR /4/2/ N ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SD DJ EC T: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-12 - DAVICS - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision denvina the dcvelnrxne nr ns :-...:-• containing six industrial buildings-totaling 22,940~squa re feet on 2.2 acres of land in the General Industrial Ois trit t, Subarea 3 of the [nAustrial Specific Plan, located on Feron Bouleva rA, east of Helms Avenue - APN: ZOO-031-87 and 88. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council support the Commission's det i5ion to deny Development Review 89-12 per the findings in Resolution 90-52. P.Ar Kf.ROIMn~ a ~ ;.i .~- romotin ~ ~~ ~ n s'y" "°"`" p1 v~eae, aimig wi en p 9 quality 'design,-is the dialogue that occurs between the City and the applicant's of development proposals. This forum for the developers and the City enhances the opportunity for quality design. When these communications are severed, as they were in this case, any chance to resolve differences is lost. With over 100 Design Review cases per year, only a small portion of these end up in an appeal before the City Council, which highlights the overall success of Lhe City's Design Review process. The applicant's existing project was originally approved in 1906. During the development of the project, the applicant changed the building material from splitface block to slumps tone block without City approval. The applicant contends that he submitted a written request to change the building materials. Staff has no record of any reaues t. In lid J, i9A9; tna annl i,ranl n ^e ^'ItCd tC the Pidnnii~g ~Gm6~7 iiiUn a request to accept the unauthorized ~c hange in the primary building material. The Planning Commission accepted the change since the building was completed, but indicated it was their position that future phases should not be proposed with the same slumps tone material. ANALYSIS; The Design Review Committee reviewed the applicant's current proposal of an industrial complex containing six industrial buildings on Feron Boulevard, east of Helms Avenue, on October I9, 1989 and February 2.2, 1990. The Design Review Committee's discussion involved CITY COUNCIL STAfF REPORT DR 89-12 - DAV IES June 6, 1990 Page 2 art hitec to ral design !i, e., building ma terialsl, site planning, and landscaping, including tree preservation. The Cesign Review Committee, after reviewing the applicant's few modifications, felt that the remaining issue could not warrant a positive recommendation to the Planning Commission. The apps icant disagreed with these recommended changes and was not wil lino to fu rthe^ modify the pt.a r,s. He instead requested to go directly to the full Planning Commission in order to persuade them in his favor. On April 11, 1990 and April 2S, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed the applicant's proposal. The Planning Commission's initial action, with the agreement of the applicant. was that this matter should be continued and referreA hark to THn nevi,.., e,.~~~-y; ^„-,,,, ,,,,« ;,~ ,~,ul ve tnese outstanding design issues. However, the applicant requested that the Planning Connniss ion of Lher approve or deny the project without the additional opportunity to resolve these outstanding issues. CONCLUSION: The applicant has appealed the Planning Commission's decision to deny DR R9-12 hosed on his disagreement with the Commission. Since his main objective was to gain aDPro vat for the use of slumps tone, he was not willing to revise the plans to resolve the other issues. After rnnsidnri^n att rt.o ~.~^.-_v;c- ,-d r;;tliC t^;i 6nouy reya rd ing cne project, the City Council may consider taking one of the following options. Option 1 Support the Pianning Commission actions and deny the applicant's appeal. Should the City Council deny the applicant's appeal, this would 6e consistent with the Commission's findings per Resolution No. 90-52. The applicant would not he able to re-a poly fnr nne year, providing the project is denied with prejudice. Option 2 Grant the applicant's appeal reversing the Planning Commission's decision of denial. This would essentially grant approval of the project as proposed with many outstanding issues remaining unresolved. Option 3 Refer the matter back to the Planning Commission/Oesfgn Review Committee. This would remove the Design Revlew function from the City Council and put it hack with Planning Commission to resolve the outstanding issues. Should the applicant refuse to consider this option, the City Council would 6e left with either Options 1 or 2. 3a3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 89-12 - DAMES ~u ne 6, 1990 Page 3 Re ctf submitted, ick omez omm ity Dg!velopment Diratfor R6:OA:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Appeal Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report of April 25, ;990 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Minutes of April 25, 1990 Resolution of Denial ?k}~ Garcia ~ associates A:chitecture Planning Urban Design Interiors 'nember American Institute of Architects 10)]2 Arrow Route Suite 604 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91]70 U 714-987-]677 ~ FA%714.990-5170 ~~a 1aD CC ~ ~`"`J'J .May 2, 1990. ^A. 'J~~2JJJ '11 /1t7~_}~ / qt~ ,r - sKY. .'-/n_) rlry nF RANrryn t rignyrv.rq P. O. Rox 807 ~ Rancho Cucamonga. California 91729 aJ~ ( Attention: City Clerk , ~ Reference Environm>n tal Assessment and Development Review 89-12, Planning Commission Appeal. Gentlemen I hereby appeal the decision of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission discussion of April 25, 1990, and disagree with Resolution Ntmber 90-52 in its' entirety. Encin sed you will find the a check in the amount of 5126.00 for the appeal fen-. Please schedule this aepea! for :he next available City Council Agenda. Rezoectfully <nhmitred GAR IA ,G ASSOCIAT ARCIiI ECTS Iint`1pa1 G IRG:rgg Enclosures: As noted above. cc: Mr. Bill Davies, Albert W. Oavles, Inc. Mr. John Mannerino, Mannerino 6 Briguglio file ~> -3aS :. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,, .~ DATE: April 25, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DFV ELnyMENr ocvrcu oo,t2 uA"v IES - The development of Phases II and III of an industrial complex, containing six !6) industrial buildings totaling 22,940 square feet on 2.2 acres of land in the General Industrial District, Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on Fe ron Boulevard, east of Nelms Avenue - APN: Z09-031-81 and 68. This item was continued from the April 11, 1990 Planning Commtss ion Meeting to allow the Commission members that reviewed the pro,lect during Des gr. Review the opportunity to hear the item. Ci BB:BA/ift ~•. Attachments: April 11, 1990 Staff Report Resolution No. 89-158 Resolution of Denial J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT ~, GATE: April 11, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-12 - D VI EIS - The development of Phaene [r ..,. r,l ..s industn al complex, tonta ini ng six (5) industrial buildings totaling 22,940 square feet on 2.2 acres of land in the General industrial District, Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on Feron Boulevard, east of Nelms Avenue - APN: 209-031-87 and 88. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Artion Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. 8. Su rrou nd ina Land Ose and Zoning: North - Orchard; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3). South - A.T. & S.F, Railroad; Industrial Specific Plan f, Subarea 3). East - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3). West - Construction service yard and office, manufacturing; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3). C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial Nest - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: A Coast Live Oak tree, approximately 38 feet in height with a spread of 42 feet fs located on the north portion of the site. There is no other significant vegetati on on the level vacant property. 1 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIR. ASSES. DR 89-12 - DAYI ES April 11, 1990 Page 2 E. Parkins Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foo to ge Ratio ReQUired Provided Phase lI Buildings Office 2,120 1:250 8 8 E thru H Lt. Ma nufac t. 10,785 1:500 22 24 Sri 32 Phase Ii1 J and K Office 1,060 1:250 4 4 . ~ _- _ nn_c ,:qnn In ,n 18 18 I[. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is requesting Environmental Assessment and Development Review for Phase II and III consisting of six (6) industrial/manufacturing buildings totaling 22,940 square feet. The DroDOSed use is consistent with Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan. Phase I of the industrial development consists of four single story buildings located to the west of the proposed Phase II. Phase I was approved in September 1980. The design and construction materials of the proposed buildings are essentially the same as the existing buildings in Phase I, which is slumps tone block. However, the decinn /materials fnr the huilAfnns in Phaso i we ra nrininally approved by Planning Commission as splitface block (Exhibit G- 1). An unauthorized change in design/materials was made for the buildings in Phase I prior to final inspection in May 1988. The proposed buildings for Phases II and III duplicate the design and materials of Phase I, Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee Chitieaa, Meinber9er~ema n) reviewed the site plans and elevations for the proposed Phase I1 and III of the industrial development on October 19, 1989. The Design Review Committee requested that a different primary exterior building material be used. The applicant resubmitted plans which were reviewed by Design Review Co,erittee (Chftiea. Tolstav, kroutill cn Pebruarv 22. 1990. The Dlans had not addressed most of the recammendattons as requested by the Design Review Committee at their October 19, 1989 meeting. The plans had been revised for the February meeting as follows: ~.: ~, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENV IR. ASSES. DR 89-12 - OAVI ES April ll, 1990 Page 3 1. Two additional proposed buildings, G znd H, which were nut shown on the previous plans, are now proposed to be located in a lawn area recommended by the Committee to be developed as a small park with a plaza, or master planned for development. 2. The planter areas at the front of build inq E, F and J have been increased in width, but not to the full 8 feet in the narrow areas for tree planting as requested. 3. Additional planter areas and plants have been proposed at Phase"II I. VVHoJ~ „r ~;.a su ~~ ~ ~~ wever, additional trees~ehould be",provided for screening. A. Enriched paving at the parking lot entrances has been shown. However, the plazas and building entrances are not shown with enriched paving as requested. Since the applicant had not addressed all of the recommendations as requested, the Committee recommended at their February 22 meeting that revised plans be resubmitted for review addressing their concerns: 1. Alternative building materials not strictl limited Lo tilt-up concrete panels, should be uti ize for the huilAinne Tha huilAinne nn Dha<o TT rm,ld ucn emm~ ivnn of block material other than slumpstone block as the primary building material. Slumps tone block could be used as an accent material. The buildings in Phase III could use the same material as the buildings in Phase II, or they could be constructed of some other acceptable material such as tilt-up coMrete. 2. Additional glass should be utilized to emphasize building entrances. 3. An additional texture/material other than glass and painted concrete should be used on the building facades, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158. .. Trees oroooied to be ola nted wi tnin Anv as samente or sewer lines which may thereby be restricted shall be id entifted. 5. Rdditional landscaping should be provided at the south edge of Phase I. Building "G" should be located further to the north in order to provide a planter area at the 2 l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIR. RSS ES. OR 89-12 - OAYI ES April 11, 1990 Page 4 south end of building "G" if the proposed landscaping is in conflict with the drainage easement. 6. Additional landscaping should be provided at the drainage easement to the south of building "F". 7. There should be an 8-foot minimum width planter area along the east side of building "H" for screen planting. 9. Potential impacts on the Oak tree, due to the proximity of the tree to proposed building "J", should be further oar ;".r"n 9. The plaza to the north of building "E" should be relocated to a more central location such as the northeast corner of building "F" for example. 10. Interlocking pavers shall be used for the "enriched paving areas" at the parking lot driveways. The extent of the pavers should be expo nded to include the full length of the driveway and include the handicap stalls. Handicap stall should 6e located adjacent to driveways to accommodate this tonce pt. ll. Enriched paving should Ge used to delineate pedestrian areas across the parking lot, connecting building entrances with nlaza areas nr with oarh nihor fnr example. 12. Building er~tra aces and walks should utilize "enriched paving." 11. An alternative surface such as turf 61ock should be used for the emergency access road. On March 9, 1990, staff received a letter from the applicant's architect (Exhibit "A") which stated that the applicant disagreed with the ORC recomme nda icons and requested that the project be scheduled for Planning Commission in order to resolve the issues at that level. Therefore, the City Planner has referred this item to the Commis lion. The plans submitted for Planning Commission are the same a5 that submitted for the last Design Review. None of the Design Review Committee recommends tf ons or comments from the februa ry meeting have been addressed, except verification that trees cannot be planted within the City drainage easement and that the lotatton of the proposed building J should not impact the roots of the existing Oak tree. %. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIR. ASSES, OR 89-12 - DAV IES April 11, 1990 Page 5 Staff also notes Lhat the project design is inconsistent with Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158, adopted on December 13, 1989, in the following areas: The architecture does not "project a high quality, progressive, sophisticated style of development." Only one primary building material is proposed (slumps tone block) versus the minimum two primary building materials required. c. The proposed -lumps tone duck is rmt representative Of the desired "textured block" material recommended for primary building materials. C. Tree Preservation An arborist report has been completed for the Subject property providing recommendations for the preservatior. of a 38-foot to 11 Coast Live Oak tree on the Phase III portion of the site. One of the preservation techniques was that no trenching deeper than 8 inches be done within 15 feet of the tree trunk, if the building "J" location is approved as proposed, the arborist recommends that area Lion units be installed at grade. A key issue with res oect to preserving the Oak tree is the location of the proposed 6uildf ng "J^ 11 feet from the tree trunk. The tree has a maximum crown spread of 42 feet. Building "J" is apD rox ima tely 22 feet in height. Construction of Building "J" would necessitate removal of apDrox ima toly ID feet of the crown an the west side of the tree to a height of about 24 feet Fram finished grade. It is staff's opinion that severe pruning would be necessary creating an unaesthetic appearance in the shape of the tree. Staff recommends that the site plan be modified to eliminate the necessity for removal of any of the tree crown and that no building should be located within the drfpline of the Oak tree. An unidentified 30-foot high deciduous tree, which was not located on the aopiicant's pian ehpu id a7se he preserved with the Oak tree in staff's opinion. It 15 staff's rec ommenda Lion that the site plan for Phase III be modified to accommodate preservation of both the Oak tree and the unidentified deciduous tree. .i' hN ~' .S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENV IR. ASSES, OR R9-12 - DAM ES April 11, 1990 Page 6 D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed Lhe project on October 17, 1989 and determined that with certain standard and special conditions of approval, the project would 6e consistent with applicable standards. E. Environmental Assessment; Part I of the Initial Studv has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part [I of the Environmental Checklist and found no sfgnificant adverse environmental impacts as the result of this project. III. Facts for Findings: The following findings are provided for the r ~~~niiril .v.. a .. J:6:JC: ~.'.Uh. i) The proposed architectural designs are incompatible with the overall design goals of the General Plan. 2} The proposed designs are inconsistent with the physical form and appearance requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan's Urban Design Concept. 3) The revisions to the proposed plans as recommended by the Design Review Committee are appropriate, given the appearance of other buildings of simfiar use within the City. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff rernmmendc that the ot~,,,, t,,,. r,,.~..~:.~:,,., take one of the following actions: '.) Deny the request through the adoption of the attached Resolution. 2) Continue the request ato allow the appiicant to develop a decinn which moere }f1~e reccasocndatian of the Design Revi~A Committee. t staff to prepare a Resolution with specific t ions o` approval to be brought back to Planning ssio}IJfor adoption. tful Brad Bulle City Planp 88:8A:sp c.~' PLANNING COMMI SS [ON STAFF REPORT ENV IR. RSSES. DR 89-12 - DAVI ES April 11. 1990 Page 1 Attachments= Exhibit "A" - Letter from Architect Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhihit "C" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "0" - Typical Site Perspective Exhibit "E" - Master Site Plan Exhibit "F" - Site Plans Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Exhibit "N" - Trash Enc iosu re Plans Exhibit "I" - Grading Plans Exhibit "J" - landscape Plans Exhibit "K" - Photographs of Trees Resolution No. 89-158 - Design Policies Resolution of Denial k: r,, {::' , ~; Oarcia SI- ~.saociatas .~•: ~.tectu re Planm ng Urban Design Interiors ~:*r. n f~e• 4m er r9n I^s:~.tute of Architects 10]22 Arrow Route March 5, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 9340-P Raseline Road Rancho Cut amonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. 9ruce Abbott Associate Planner ter: ~iv::J- p7 ANNMr- p11G570h' Iar;ROS ~qan 71819~It'i~=i1 "ICI'-wlb Suite 60J Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91]30 ]14A8]46I3 rnx n4-9eo-s 130 ReRardina: Davies Ind oar •i a! P-r!' Architect lob No. 187-022-003 Dear Mr. Abbntt: Thank you for your prompt reply regarding the Development Review Comments fnr nor Davies Industrial Park project. Your expediency is greatly appreciated. C,a rcia & Associates and our client have carefully studied the Design Review Comm tree's <omrrents. We were dismayed to find that the progress needed for us to arrive to a satisfactory solution has yet to be attained. Since our client disagrees with the recommendations, we have reached the concl us inn that it would be best for all parties Involved to have this matter resolved ..^.t the commission level. Having said that, we ask that our project he scheduled for the next Planning Commission agenda. Finally, I would like to personally thank you for all of your cooperation and hard work over the past few years. If you should have any questions or comments regarding the topic covered, Dlease feel free to contact me. `p ectfully, FIA R /r(5 5 AR ITECTS 1indlpal Rr,: c•r cc: Mr. gill Davies, Owmer File CITY OF 33~{ ITE,~1: L7R ~'~~~ IZ:~;vCI"IC+ Ct~i~ TITLE~i2Z°~? FROM AR~~i`7~? PLANNING DIV610N EXHt131T~ ~ SG -: `~ ` -- ~~/~~/~~ r~7f1 I _:.:.h71DN IN J'Jrt2 u. ~ ~ ,~ i ~.L. °~+ .._ ~ I_.__. 5U/ G2EA = ` ----I 3 ,~ ~ c I6HT1-i ST. D ~s _ Lt-H-YO ® Ni~~O ~w~~~~ ASK 1 L -~~ ~~ :• ~ ~~ i :/ t / 1 _~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _- ~~ I ~i ~ ~ : ~,~~ 1 ~~ ~ ; ~ ~~ --~~,_ __~ ~i rr~ ~~ _. .~. .nom. T Twni~__ _ ~_ ~.. _t -- 3 1 ! ~ ~ ~: i W _ _ ~l - i ~~~~••I' _ +. _ I ~~ ~~ ! Y ---- ,,-=, ~l t 1yR~` (i ~u t iji _' •aaelaoa. _ ___~ HtlVd lVItl15114Ni III 41135VNd '.4~~1 ~-, . t _ . ' S31AV0 ~ 3ALL03dStl3d'Sfllll ~k , ~ ~ ~ y _\ l~_ ,. _~. _.__. r ~q ~ . r 'A, , 3~c -~ • c - "' ~. , ~ .f V~. =_:~ris~ :_?' .. 'tit-i: •f __ ~' -~~-~~ ~1 .. __ ,i i~ ' - -- _ _ ~ __ --_ s. r at3 , r F_::~ ='-= ___ d y ~ N L ' a , 1 ~o a . ` an y ~' 1 G 9 _ `. ~ 1~ '~ ' ~ ' ~' ' ' y _ , - 6 t I d ~' ~., I ~& , Q v K1 ~ ~~~RRR I .~37 s I _ ___ __ Z1-88-tlO ~ _ s'i~ ' ~~ Htltld ~Vltll SflONI tll7!135MId (V va~ho~~~y yy ga~a•O S31AtlO NVld 3LS 1131SVY1 ,ah~ r-_---_--- _~' a ,. ?eF ~ of I ;. ~ ~~ a £'!:~f I I f ;£,. ___..______~ _________~ I r ' I Z F~::i I ~ ~.~{~i:t i _ I 1[ ~ i ig (jr l I t ~J _ F .,. , ~ `~~ --~ 1 a _ il; _ ~ ~'u~ n iii ~i fl~ -"~--~= , i n I I FI i.i ~ I I: N . ; ; ~ L____1 ~;~ _ Fat r---~! ~- -- ~ :I i ~ i ~ I y~ i t I. I I I / T is I i i ~ / ____-_____ ._. ____ it +", ~ r~ J ~ ~ii ti M 4i (al F F t- V U ~~ HQ U CL~ ~_ 2 X w :a a z d ~' 6 ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ I~~°v ~ ~r e C~ {~~ a ~~:aii ~~ ~~ ~i~~ E e ~~ t~ . ~~ E~~€ - ~ C` » _ .. _ ~ _-~ ~ i i e ? i Ji ~ a ~ y "~ i ~ E d WW ~. ee ~ _, 2f F S~ t ' = N l` ~ ;•~~ ~ 5 #. e ~ FI' i - ~ i N +.. 0 p2o ti: u ,• T~ i~ ; ~-~- , ii i E ~ ~ 0 ' ` ~ ~ T' ~~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 4 y f l-r~ ~ H 4 a;s f it ~Mttl~~~~~~~~k CC ~q"i a,~ it 19 9! !P I~ : 5 T ~~ ,: E ~E~ .E+i ~i i ~~~ ~, ~~; tt€r ~~~ ~ . .~~ ~ E~ i~~~i 41 J b J t~ii F = F- F y a ~~ z U R; _~ _ ._~T-:lS-TL1T4Ttf~ :T1T-._ .339 - ~~~ ~~ +~ ~~~ li ~~ f~ ~ + '- :-- f ~ , , ~, ~, ~.._ ; - ~, ~II 1I ~ ~ ~,'! .~ Q~ 4~, ;~ ~ ; ~~~ ~, = i; 4 ~~! _ ~ ~ _' _ _~~_~ t;~l ~i:~ ec h <<C ; ~~~ ~~~'~ ~0 ~ ~ w ii~i3;-1 ~i! ~y ~i ~ ~! i 3 s ~ g~~3~. l~~k ~: ~~ ~~: ~ ! : ~~ •...__.. ~~ ~I ~ -w ' ti ~, . _ ~~ ~~ ~~ t1'~4-.1'!-- P r; ;~ 0: h~ ~ jib; ~E~~ pp ~i~ x ~ fii~ {{ ~ tit3 1 ~ ~f . ~~ ., ~ ~g ~~ E '3 ~~ ~,~~,~~ f _~ ~~ai ~3i ;i ~ ~ 3~0 ~p:~ r• •. P f,s~ s~ ~` 7 ,~e ,-~,~ i~ ~~Ic a { 7! i ii~ E ~1 ~ j~i L W~` _,~ x ~~; H•k o~=a ~~~§ O~ ~w aryygey J i! W ~ ~ n~~ LL~~ €~ s .t FL ;: 5' ! 1i r Z oa ~• ~~ ~~ a~ ¢~ i 2 O~ ~- q6W a W V ¢~ 3~ f g5~~3 7~3~! ~! ~3EE~ ~F ~~~ i c ~~~~ 3~33i~ f i~z~~ ~' F' i> S~EY~ 63 Z ~~ O 3i < ?e ~ W W O Vf fi Or~;b r ^~~ 4 Y i W jj W ~ii~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~s ~. I, ~ ~ti .... w; ~ ao Lt' t~'+~a ~, •, r~'a ;S ?iie ~ I' ~ ~, S j ~_ t j~ j, {~ +~ .E z 1( ~! ~~ ~i l _~~ 3s o ~~ Q,~U rj ~~d rc ~ .:~ '.;~ W~ r~ .i 2L" er ,",.f ~. LLs3 ,~,~ ! .L, ' ~, _ ~i3 ;<;~. ~- c~. i _ ~3~ ~yH~ '= i oµ~ <~~; J~3 W 22~ ~ 71~ LL~~ r' r z Oa a~ w wyy~ wa ¢~ i 3 ~~3 o• Ali ~~ ~~~a QWQ~ d !!k_ S 3 ~{ i~ tai 3'~.~ • of y ~~~~ ~3~~~ ?', s~~$~ {i = ~e O 3~ ~ ~~ a _ > J W W O y . i •.'' .. Zf O`~ J W ~~~.tj~E?~E~ H ii7~ s~-e.-w ~: ~ ~~i~1 ~ ~ w.. - ~o ~ 3unsm~ Ntnu ! , :1 11 j ~ ;~ :; ~ ~ __ ,~€~if~~e? - °- ~i :e_ /.. ~ i ~ 1~~ ~ ~ 1 ~' • ~ ~~ ~ -_ -- , a -- .:- ' -r`- ~ 1 ~' .. ~, 1~~ li! ~i ~ ! ; un __. ~, _ b ~ !~~ ~ '1 ~ _. j 1 ~_ -'j`J I w `i ; W ____ ~ ii \ u. ~~J ~j 3 3 ~~i ~~ u3 F y ~~y V b ~, ~ Z '7 VW 4, . aii ~ i ti i+u!+nli:1,~ i • ,--i, .. `-i 'i 4; .4 ~~ 1 I fI ~! .. ~ _. ~i '1 •~ i X11 !"iI' ' +' • ~~ ~ ' i; II,, w , 7 ti;~il ?; ,i iE .~.;. ~' ~•~,~i ;' r .I{j+lln 'lil,~ dlllu~lll,l~ ~irl;lh,;;!I,IE~: ~till6liuli~l ~ n,.lim„It:u ! r Ili ~~ 1 i ~!!I !4 ~'' + I ~:~. 'i. iv QI Eil 1 a ~II~ ~ i'~' z Qt ~..'.~ ~h1 ~ ~ ; I .~1! 1 + Ule ~ µi {~~f+~~l ~ i i Kyn. .' ~/ .oo. - /~ I I ' • ~4 ~'t ~ CI ~~ ,-~. ~'t I .W ~i !: ' + ;~ ~ ~r _ j _ 7 ' i+: I7 i li ~ i l ~ I,~ w ~ ! i ;"? ~;; 4 I .. 4 F b M1 ~ r' i.i a! ~ .~, ., a,, <. ! ~ ~! r _ "'-~- ~ ~ _..u ...: IJ .. - . . _... --- _- - 11 ar 11.,1 lia tf :.11.:I . 1. f ui;l '" i :iii :~~jlijltr l~ ,.I~ i~ f 11;q ''i, Vii'; ':rii•'ii€„ li p :J i. k!!I+1•~+rt iiai~l:iiu `it4, f IL, ~. .. ',, j ij: I' Il i , I ~ it t : I ' 4.d~ I ~ li, .pi i y±t,7: ,! F ~ ~ ,.' ;! I ~~: '~' ,., -' J u a i 1 it ; ~9 I ~ i ? ' T ~ 1 , ~• ti :,u,,:a. , 1 , ~ ,,. ~ . ~ ~ 0 3 .,il~,,. ,Ju• ,,, ~:I :•, ~. ,: -. ~yl. DTI,: .~-;; ~. ti--:. ~ 1 t ` ip Y tl: I`LL ~rJl ~i ~1 tt ! 1 M St `~-__E _ ~ 1-fi ~~ ,. 1 r ~ •, ~ i t .. t `~'' ,' ' ~' ` tiNllgil~H' :. . t '~ 1 ~~_~ _~. I rLrb ~ ~ IJlltl II c I ( _~ `Y~'- ~i ~~~ r ~ ~ W ~ , : t-1•- ~ - 1 ~ ~ ,1 of + ~ '- o t S W 1 W 1. 1 1 i 1 ~- _.~_ _ ?_1 ~ i . I~._ W ~ 1 1 _ _ r` !, 6 r I I ~~~ ~;i I _ ~ ~~~ ~ ,: as e 4 N M 1 ~ w ~ a t) J = s_~x _ ~ :~ 7e fi k ~~ z E~ Q Ud s i a ~ ~ t ~ ~ s ~ X31 a~ ~ :: 4 tt# !~ i~ i~ a~ §~ it 7~~~ '..! 8 ~ ~ 7: ~~ .~ °f ~ 11 ~ a~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ r'~ ~ t°~ '~~ ~~ ht 1 (Sy 17' ~~` i'~ <tc ;° jd ~ ~tiSf~ ~~~;; ~~ F.~ T) ;t ~ I~p~ ~ ~ y' ~ '~ 9p~ ~ ~ - 7~ ~8..~ e11 'IS !"'f ~I `~ .~ ~~ ;3Si,j1 ~; ~ ~~ ~~~ ~f ~~ ~ Flt ~ ?I3 ---- Et , _~ ~ n i 2 ~~ h '~ a ° ~ J s° s! _ t' ~! ~ . ~t F - ~~ ,,w`' ~ °YI_. ~~ w .~,~~ . . ~ ~ aii~~~ea~~~3~~! i~ . . ~~ ~~ ~~1~ r~~ ~i !! ~ 6 ~~8 •~~ .~ - m u b VI F u~3 F = F" F ~~ V > a ~~ ~ H¢ ~ ~~ 3~7 Q W O U) 71 Z Z z 7_ Q O _~ i~ y~~~ I 1I~/JJJI 'I 1~ ~~ i .t J. -y .t' F ~ ~n U '~ /'1 - >. ~ z ~~ 7. ,,,., <C U cC s .3~8 ~..r ~- } a , ~ !~ ~ ;Q O ; z Q ~ i , ;~ ~ ~I~'~ _ ~ I` O ~ N" z ~i QI °~ ~= F FF-- ~.1~ ~ 3 O z U~ ~ ~.. z_ C ~ az Z ~, ii z Q Y Q ;- U GL~ s O J RESOLUTION N0. 89-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING Ci)rMI55fON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTAOLISHING DESIGN POLICIES FOR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS REQUIRING ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND CREATIVE USE OF BUILDIHG MATERIALS NITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NHEREAS, the Planning Commission has expressed design concerns with painted tilt-up concrete industrial buildings, as they lack variety, have fnadequate architectural treahsent, increase maintenance, and create dated building design and previous oreiects have ~~* ,Ae,.,~,.e~.. aAA.r•..A .....!_<~~- -- -' ---- - -:y:: concerns; and NNERFAS, there is a need to establish a design goat to guide future development; and NHEREAS, design policies are necessary to expound and implement the established urban design guidelines and standards of the Industrial Specific Plan; and NHEREAS, such design policies are needed to provide clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby estabiish design policies for the additional architectural traahww~ ,^A_ c:^cnti•ra u;a o; ouiiding materials as follows: SECTION 1: Goai Statement The intent of the design policies 1s to assist the designer in understanding and complying with the Urban Design Guidelines and Standards of the industrial Specific Plan. The goal is to ensure high quality and timeless building design, which includes building entry focal point, sufficient articulation to building plane, and the creative use of building materials. These design policies expound the established Urban Destyn Guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan and shall apply to all industrial buildings within the Specific Plan area. SECTION 2: Design Criteria A. Desirable archftecture shall project a high quality, progressive, sophisticated style of development. Variations 1n architectural style, construetlon methoAs and materials are encouraged. 350 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-158 RE: ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT December 13, 1969 Page 2 6. All building entrances shall be well articulated and protect a formal entrance statement through variations of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape plazas, as well as relate to pedestrians. C. The articulated building entrances, together with the landscape plazas, should be designed to relate to and connect with the area-wide network of open space, thus, unifying and fostering a sense of community. 0. The degree of architectural treatment and embellishments must relate to the scale and mass of the budding. E. Accent treatment, such as changes in exterior materials and texture, is required. F. The creative use of building materials is required. A minimum of two (2) primary building materials shall 6e used. The recommended primary and secondary building materials are as follows: Primary building materials - - Sai1~W acted concrete, textured block, ^^bri ck, granite, marble, and similar materials as approved by the Design Review Cpmmittee. Secondary building materials - glass, tile, polished brass or copper, brick, concrete, painted metal elements, painted accent stripe, and other materials as approved by the Design Review Committee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1989. PLANNING~C`0//~IISSION~O~'F}THE CyIyT~Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 35r PLANNING CpMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-158 RE: ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT December 13, 1989 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coamiission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planningg Coewfssion held on the 13th ddy of December, 1989, by the following vote-to-rrit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAdESLEY, CNITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE COPMISSIONERS: NONE ~•. 3S~- :f' ~;ms r RESOLUTION N0. 90-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO RNiA, DENYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 89-12, A REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO DEVELOPMENT REVIEN OF PHASES II AND ?II OF AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 6 BUILDINGS TOTALING 22,940 SQUARE FEET ON 2.2 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN Oil FERON AVENUE EAST OF HELMS AVENUE, ANO MAKING fI NDIN GS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-031-87 ANO 88. A. Recitals. i, n!s.~r+ ~~ ~..~ ~-_ ~ es ice. __ "',:.a.:__ c;;. 'h^ rnnrnval rc Development Review No. 89-12 as~desc ribed ~~in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 11th day of April, 1990, and continued to the 25th day of April, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the apps ication and concluded said meeting an that date. i ii i) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Re so lotion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved 6y the ?lamming Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meetings on April 11, 1990, and April 25, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specf fic ally finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on Feron Avenue, east of Helms Avenue with street frontages of 151.67 feet for Phase II and 154.88 feet for Phase III and lot depth of 393.48 feet and 222.5fi font respectively, and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is an orchard, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3; the property to the south of the site consists of A.T. 6 S. F. Railroad, zoned Industrial Specffic Plan, Subarea 3; the property to the east is vacant, zoned Industrial Specific Pia n, Subarea 3; and the property to the west is a manufacturing and construct ion service yard and offfce, zoned Industrial Specffic Plan, Subarea 3. -353 PLANNING COMMISSION _.50WTION N0. 90-52 OR 89-12 - OAVIES April 25, 1990 Page 2 (c) The architecture, materials, and site plan do not meet the design criteria established for that dis Lr ict within the Industrial Specific Plan and Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158. (d) The proposed architectural designs are incompatible with overall design goals of the General Plan. (e) The revisions to the proposed plans as recommended by Oes'~gn Review Committee are appropriate for meeting the goals and design c ri tz ria of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial av idence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific find inr:a ne `acts set fartk .n pa rag ra pns i and 2 above, to 15 Commission hereby finds and concludes a5 follows: (a) That the proposed project i5 not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed project is not in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and !c) That the proposed project is not in compliance With each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and ~d) That the proposed project without the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 1990. PLANNING COMyiS5I0N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST .35~{ PLANNING COMMISSI~u-RESOLUTION N0. 90-52 ~- DR 89-12 - OAVI ES April 25, 1990 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fo rego tng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commis lion held on the 25th day of April, 1990, 6y the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: f.H tT[EA, MCNIEL, TOL STOY. MEINBE RGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~~ ~' a,:. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the proposed solution of replacing the two buildings with one larger building is better. Chairman Mc Niel felt the applicant had done a good job. Motion: Moved by Talstoy, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the Reso lu lion approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map t3123. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOME ABSENT: COMNI SSIONERS: NONE -carried Motion: Moved by Neinherger, secoM ed Dy Chitiea. to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Deve lalv.eat Rev:^, en__,, :,c ia„ --__~_~ ~~ ine poi lowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITI EA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded Dy Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution approving Modifiration to Development Review 88-20. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHETIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER ~,.^.CS. vui4iia~iuntNS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried . . w a OLD BUSINESS x a -~ F. •~ ENYIRONIIENTA!-~AlStlSN[NT"AND"/- ~S - The eve-lopment~ ase3~s"il~aod~ro an n striel comp exT conta~ing six (6) industrial buildings totaling 22,900 square feet on 2.2 acres of land in the General Industrial District, Subarea 3 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on Feron Boulevard, east of Helms Avenue - APN: 209-031-87 and 88. (Continued from April I1, 1990.) Brew AbMilq Associate Planner, stated he was avetlable to answer any questions. Commissioner CAttiea asked if the appltunt had submitted any changes to address any of the concerns listed at the last Design Review. Planning Commmission Minutes -8- April 25, 1990 3 Sly Mr. Abbott stated that only two items have been verified since the last Design Review: (1) that no trees can be located within the st0 rm drain easement, and (2) that the location of Building J should not impact the roots of the oak tree which has been designated by the arbor ist for preservation. He said that staff found with further review of Building J that severe pruning would be required to accommodate the proposed location of Building J, so staff was recommending that Building J not be located within the drip if ne of the tree. Commissioner Tolstoy asked for clarification on the additional tree shown in the photographs. Mr. Abbott stated an approximate 30-foot high deciduous tree was shown in the photographs but had not been shown on the applicant's plans. He said staff fs recommending that that tree be preserved along with the oak tree pending identification of the species because it may or may not fall under the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Commissioner Tolstoy asked haw close the deciduous tree is to the oak tree and if it intrudes upon the canopy of the oak tree. Mr. Abbott felt it is approximately 26 to 30 feet from the oak tree and does not intrude upon the canopy. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the tree is a columnar type or a spreading type. Mr. Ab6att stated it is a spreading type, Dut the skirt of the tree has Deen pruned up quite high so that trucks can readily pass under it. Chairman Mc Niel invited public testimony. Les Davies, 6239 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they requested that the Planning Comm is sign review the protect at this time instead of continuing to work with the Design Review Committee because the owner wishes to use slump block and that has been a sore point with the Design Review Committee. He stated that Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-158 lists textured block as an approved material, but the Design Review Committee refused to accept slump block as the building material. He felt the staff report did not adequately reflect the compromises they have made to go forward with the project. He said they had increased the plazas, planters, landscaping, and deco rat the paved areas. He stated the owner is adamant about using stump block because it was used on Phase I, He said they were to error when they changed the butldtng material on Phase I to slump block without obtaining written approval but they had increased their landscaping in an effort to smooth the situation over. He said they dfd not recall making any promise that they would not use slumpitone on future phases when Phase i was accepted. He said they only recalled making a promise that they would not deviate frbm plans when approved for future phases. H! said they dfd not wish to use tilt-up concrete because the tilt-up concrete butldtng next door to their facility is constantly in need of painting because the paint is peeling. He said some other buildings in their area have only 4-foot planters and no pavers and only small employee plazas hidden behind concrete tilt-up Planning Commission Minutes -9- April 25, 1990 357 walls. He safd Buildings 6 and H were added when they master planned the area, and they had never promised to build a park area. He said the Dui id ings are tucked away against a railroad spur and will not be seen from any ma Jar street. He felt the buildings should be designed by the owner, not the Design Review Committee. He felt the number of conditions have increased with each Design Review Committee only because they refuse to to change the block. He felC if the block were not an issue, no other conditions would be required. He said the arborist had told them in August that the oak tree would survive a pruning and that it would be acceptable to have a building within IS feet of the tree so long as aeration units are installed. He said on April 10, 1990, they received a letter from the arborist crarfng he had changed his position. He felt that the Design Review Committee has lost their direction and he requested that slumpstone block be permitted. Jorge Garcia, Ga rcfa d Associates, 10122 Arrow Route, Rancho Cu camonga. felt the Pla nn inn Commie"ipn f,,;resf .y ilauiiiiy on the architect and the structural engf veers Dy specifying the building materials to be used. He felt the architects and engineers should make the decision on materials. He felt that ff the City hoses their will on the cho tee of building materials, then the City assumes the liabilf Cy for structural integrity. Commissioner Chitiea stated that splitface block wns specified for Phase I, Dut slumpstone was used. She asked why the architect was now saying that slumpstone is more structurally sound than splitface. She also stated that she did not feel the City ever told the applicant he must use tilt-up. Chairman Mc Niel felt it is lad it rows to suggest that the burden of if abitfty would fail on the City 6etau se Planning Commis Sion Resolution 89-158 includes concrete as an option. Commissioner Tolstoy stated h. w+a~~t ••-E.;;ta „J i.iie orrrerence in building incegr icy between splitface and stumpstone. Mr. Garcia stated there is no difference in structural integrity between splitface and slumps tone, but they were told to Duiid tilt-up buildings, not block. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he was present at one of the Design Reviews and he recalled that tilt-uD was suggested as a type of construction that the Ctty would accept along witA other materials. Ne safd that tilt-up has been mentioned many times as the protect has Deen reviewed, but the City ha6 not said it has to be used. Coa~issioner Tolstoy stated he did not feel tilt-up should be used for the buildings because they arc scull. Mr. Garcia stated Dhases II and tit are designed w be a continuation of Phase 3, Mr. Davies stated that at an October 19, 1989, meeting one of the Commissioners stated "there was no way you wilt build a masonry building 1n this town." He said in future meetings they were told the slumpblock is an inferior product and would not be satiable. Dlanning Commission Minutes -10- April 25, 1990 3-5g Leonard Thompson, Masonry Institute of the Inland Empire, 1535 South "D' 1955 eC~Hea sta fed propert ~awne rsh rata ini tproafe ssio nals lto hd esigntand Aconstruct buildings and the architect is the most important member of the team, as he specifies the material to be used to meet the needs created by the function of the building. He said the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted and uses the standards of the Uniform Building Code based on the standard specifica tfons of the American Society for Testing Materials. He said slumps tone block is considered a textured block with a shape to resemble the Spanish/American heritage. He said a recent newspaper article quoted City staff as saying that siumpstone is not of Mgh enough quality to be used. He said many buildings have been designed, engineered and constructed with slumps tone. He said siumpstone is being specified to maintain continuity with Phase [. He felt the Design Review Comaittee is discriminating against siumpstone, the architect, engineer, owner, and the masonry industry. There was no Further public testimony. Chairman Mc Niel stated this multi-phased protect went through the City's development process and was then approved by the Planning Coaq issian. He said that although the approved primary building ma ter cal was splitface block, the aDPlica nt used slumps tone. He said the applicant then requested that the Planning Commis sfon allow Phase I to be siumpstone and the Planning Commis lion agreed with the proviso that future phases would be splitface block, as originally agreed. He did not see how the City was guilty of discriminating against the masonry industry by requiring splitface instead of slumps tone. He felt the listing Of other iS aueS is COmm00 LO other pro~eC t3 aixl Lh05! {S aUBa had not been addressed. He felt the issue of siumpstone versus splitface to be only the tip of the iceberg. Commissioner Chitiea stated the integrity of siumpstone block was never questioned and the Design Review Committee has never suggested that concrete block is not an appropriate building material. She said the siumpstone finish was discussed in relation to aesthetics and compatibi City with other projects in the area. She felt the Coawissfan was very reasonable in allowing the shes be lieved tthe rem wa saanb ag reement that~theonexti phase so would repre sent a a^dn improvement in aesthetics. she felt the building material is only a small part of what makes the pro,jett. She said there are site plan dtfftculttes is sues,a employee lunch areas Bands bu ildt g designs in terms of haw the entr lei work or could be enhanced or redesigned. She said those issues had Deen discussed at Design Review, bu4 the applicant had not provided any plans to address them. She said that the Planning Commission now requires two primary building xiatertals nn ail proyects acid the applicant is only proposing one material. She felt the issue of the oak tree is significant and she wished to savedior not. sShe feltelt isfi epprapr9ateyto plate a buildingrlltfeetofromba withstandhthat type oof distouwr^banceshe5heosatd Lheeappllunt was notsasked to remove the building, but to redesign it. She felt the List of requirements to Planning Commission Minutes -1t- Rpril 25, 1990 3~g be typical of chat 1s asked on all projects, and she felt there was no reason why the Drojeet could not De 6uflt once the items are addressed. She stated the applicant has repeatedly stated they will make changes but the changes have not appeared on the plans. She felt the project to 6e nowhere near ready for approval. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the Design Review Committee was not addressing the sla bility of building materials, only aesthetics. He felt. slumps tone is not the kind of material the Committee Nis hes to see in that particular area, He concurred that the other items need to be addressed. Commissioner Chitiea stated mere had been discussions about how combinations of materials could be utilized to make the project work. She stated that some of the buildings in Phase fI and III do not even face Phase I. Chairman Mc Niel felt the aDPlica nt's allegations Mere inappropriate and less than true. He stated the Planning Commission went a long way to allow Phase I to go forward, He felt the abject of the Pla nn iaa C.osmi~s?-- ?- •- :- .a l:;u "-^v^'^^^-':' i::`:i?a p:ct~c ling the community from the mismanagement of that development. He felt there needs to be a sense of cooperation on the part of the developer. Ne said the position of the developer has been stated publicly that he as property owner has the right W build whatever he chooses. Chairman Mc Niel stated the Commission had three opt tons: (1) deny the project, (2) continue the matter to allow the applicant to develop a design which meetz the recommendations of the Design Review Committee, or (3) direct staff to prepare a resolution with specific toad ittons of approval t0 be adopted at a future meeting. Commissioner Chitiea suggested asking the applicant if he would consent to a continuance. CL,~~urnricmei requested the applicant respond. Mr, Davies requested that the Planning Commission state if slumps tone block could or could not be used as the primary building material. Ne felt the slumpstone 61ock was the only issue. Commissioner Chitiea felt the Plannfn~ Commission could not act upon only one is sun. She felt the Wmlmis lion could give d}ret Lion, but !hey could not pass any sort of Resolution on only one Item on the list. Chairman Mc Niel felt the use of slumps tone block 1s a point of negotiation no different from any other point of negotiation and was not exclusive of the balance of the problem. Commissioner Chitiea felt the plans needed to be in closer conformance before the Commission should give approval. Commissioner Toistoy felt the project needed to return t0 Design Review. Commissioner Chitiea felt the project should come into conformance or be dented without prejudice. Planning Commission Minutes -12- April 25, 1990 .3G o i concerned to see that the City gets the best development~.ydssible. She ised the efforts of staff. ~ i~ Mr. Bo stated he would like to meet Chairman McNf€1 at the site to review the builds s. He asked if it would be pojalhle to work with staff to determine if resurfacing of Building A meets the standards. Chairman McNiei sta he would make a ~gements to meet at the site. Mr. Mager stated that the t y would be able to do with Building A would be to match Building 8, not test panel. He requested that the motion be modified to allow ma tchi~g~6f Bui g B. Chairman Mc Hiel st}k€d he would not ame his motion. He stated that it may be determined ttyat Building B is comparable the test panel. Mr. Bullerista ted an attempt should be made to str to ar hi PVP the level of fFo ~+..~i- -_- /J r - PUBLIC COMMENTS Les Davies, 6239 Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, requested that Item F, Environmental Assessment and Development Review 89-12, be reopened. He stated he nad misunderstood what he had agreed to and he requested that he be allowed to withdraw his agreement to a continuance. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, asked if Mr. Davies was now asking that an action be taken, even if it led to a denial, Mr. Davies responded affirms lively. Mr. Hanson stated there was no legal reason that the Commission could not reconsider its action, but it was at the Commission's option. Chairman McNiel asked if Mr. Davies wished to drop his request for a continuance to work on the protect and accept either an approval with conditions or a Aenfal. Mr. Davies requested that the Coaaaissfon deal with the Resolution of Denial. Mr. Manson stated that if the requested action were to result in a denial, the applicant would have only one opt ton, which would be to appeal to the City Council. He said that ff the City Council does not approve the appeal, the applicant would not have an option to return LO Planning LO reactivate the project without filing another application and paying the fees. Mr. Davies responded that he understood. Planning Consaission Minutes -20- April 25, 1990 3 ~3 Drad Rulle r, Cf ty Planner, stated that during the Design Review Drocess the applicant was given opportun ittes to return with alternative building materials and the applicant had chosen not to come back with alternatives. He felt the question is whether the applicant is willing to consider any other alternatives other than slumpstone block. Mr. Davies 5ta led he was asking that slumpstone block be accepted as the primary building material. Mr. Buller stated the Commission could give minute action direction that the design as propose8 with the use of slumpstone is inappropriate and the applicant should proceed back through the Design Review process. He said Ghe applicant would then have to decide if he would take that direction. Commissioner Chitiea felt that was an approDria to step. She felt there are many other equally serious concerns, but the Commission could giv¢ direction on that one issue. i.ha irman me Nf el asked the Commfs sion's feelings about slumpstone versus other materials. Commissioner Chitiea felt Chere should be two materials and that slumpstone is inappropriate for this particular pro,iec t. Commissioner iolstoy agreed but felt that slumpstone could be used as a secondary ma serial. Commissioner Chitiea agreed slumpstone could be used as an accent material. Commissioner Weinberger concurred and su99ested that when the Dro,iect rPnirn<n to Design Review it ~arA ane ^~_,•+~ t~ ,-2r;aweu by other Can,aissio nets because cnere appeared to be a wall built between the applicant and some oP the Commissioners. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the Design Review Committee had already asked for two materials and suggested that the slumpstone could be used as a secondary or accent material. ~' •. Chairman McNiel stated he participated in the Design Review Drocess of Phase I when it was agreed that the pro,iect would be constructed of splitface block. He said at that time it was determined that slumpstone was not an acceptable material. He said one of the things the Commission is attempting to do in the community is to upgrade alt areas. He felt the Commission was ortgfnally set up to upgrade the conmafnity. Chairman McNtel agreed that slumpstone is acceptable as a secondary material, but not as a primary material, Nr. Buller stated the minute action would give the applicant direction regarding the slumpstone. He suggested the Commission might wish to ask the applicant when he would like to return to Design Review with alternative building designs. He stated that the Commission was providing direction, but they had not made a decision. He said direction could not De appealed to City Council, but a decision could be appealed. Planning Commission Ninutes -13- April 25, 1990 3~ l Chairman NcNfel asked if the applicant wished to continue the project and bring it back through the Design Review process to seek resolution. Mr. Garcia stated that the use of any other type of block would not blend in with slumpstone as a secondary material because of the difference in colors ova i'a 61e. He stated they would like direction to 6e able to use slumpstone on the two buildings adjacent to Phase [and then use other materials for th¢ remaining buildings. Chairman Mc Niel asked again if the applicant wished to continue the project and bring it Dack through the Design Review process to seek resolution.. Mr. Davies stated they would like to continue at this time. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded oy Neinberger, to continue Environmental Assessment and Development Review 89-12. Motion carried by the following vote: ... _.,. Lu'nrii;iSiJri[n5; to 111tH, MLNIEL, TOLSTO Y, NEINGERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried R f t • ! 9:00 P.M. -Planning Commission recessed. 9:10 P.M. - Planning Commission reconvened. . . ~ : r `~ REVIEN OF LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE COSTS NITHIN ASSESSMENT OISTRICyf~(Oral Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated that staff is ~ntly looking at the budget and wanted to present some issues that the C is Yacfng regarding maintenance of the eight landscape maintenance distr s. He said some of the major areas of maintenance are trails, parkwa Darks, trees, and median islands. He stated soaK of the major c areas are vandalism, water, contract maintenance, and regular main ante utilixtng City staff. He indicated that budget requests to Lain current levels of service in maintenance districts may have to cut approximately 45 to 50 percent to avoid huge raises in the assess s. He said the City is attempting to find more cost-effective ways to er and amintaln. Mr. Fulwood slaved sereral charts of costs for the van us maintenance districts and said the City has to make up the shortfall m the General Fund. He said the City is currently estimating landscap intenance costs at f750 per unit in the North Etiwanda area. He said al Landscape maintenance costs are• between f~,000,000 and 34,000,000. stated that the three main phases of any project are the design, co ruction, and maintenance; and the design of the infrastructuro nos a r impact on the long-term maintenance. ~ arming Commission Minutes -14- Apri1~L5,` 1990 -3~~- Chairman McNiel asked if the Planning Commission wished to allow the item to be reopened. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that if the applicant wished the item to 6e reopened, it should be reopened. Commissioner Chitiea stated she had no objections to reopening the item so long as the applicant urxiersto od the ramifications. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to reconsider Item F. Mr. Hanson stated the Commis sinr. had thereby deleted the former action. Chairman Mc Nfel requested public comment. Mr. Davies requested that the Plano inn room.?<_;;;;;; yaas or deny the Resolution, in essenre ecr^-• ;:r 'a„y the project. He stated that the owner encouraged soar a Resolution of Approval with conditions not be approved, but preferred that the Commission approve or deny the Resolution of Denial. Mr. Hanson stated that the applicant appeared to be asking that the application be approved or denied exactly as presented by the applicant. Mr. Davies stated that was correct. Commissioner Chitiea stated that she wanted to be sure the record reflected that any vote wouid be based upon alt of the considerations and requirements, not merely the one aspect of building materials. Commissioner Tolstoy aq reed that rti<.e .y__ ,,,,, ~~,;y ,,11e issue involved. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by McNiel, to adapt the Resolution of Denial for Environmental Assessment and Development Review 89-12. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LHITIEA, MLNIEL, TOLSTOY, NEINBEROER NOES: r,OMM155[ONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried « ~ r There were no further public comments. R # * + t ~'CO ION BUSINESS ,. K. TRAILS ADVI MMITTEE APPAiNTMERTS (Continued froai 4/11/90) Planning.LomRission Minutes -21`'~--~,._ April 25, 1990 ~' ,. 2 ~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. 9~ -~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S GENIAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEN N0. 89-12, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLE% CONTAINING SI% INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 22,940 SQUARE FEET ON 2.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3 OF THF. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON FERON Hopi EV APn, rncT nc Y.ELMS A:'ENOE. A. Recitals. (i) Albert N. Davies has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 89-12 as descrihed ie rr,o +:+~_ .,o ••<- ^___~~~~'-- nereinarzer to tm s tie solution, the subject Development Review re questVis referred Lo as "the application." (i i) On the 11th day of April, 1990, and continued to the 25th day of April, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application. (iii) On dune 6, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to hear an appeal on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ~. . iVll. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced meetings on April 11, 1990, and April 25, 1990, and presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on dune 6, 1990 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on Feron Ave..^.ae, e"st of Rel ms Avenue eith street frontages of 151.87 feet for Phase II and 154.88 feet for Phase III and lot depth of 393.48 feet and 222.56 feet respec t,ively, and is presently unimproved; and 3`P S CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. `~: DR 99-12 - DAVI ES June 6, 1990 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of Che subject site is an orchard, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3; the property to the South of the site consists of A.T. d S.F, Railroad, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3; the property to the east is vacant, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3; and the property to the west is a manufacturing and construction service yard and office, zoned Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 3. (c) The architecture, materials, and site plan do not meet the design criteria esta hl fished for that district within the lndu strial Specific Plan and Planning Commission Resolution No. R9-I58. (d) The proposed architectural designs are incompatible with OVe rdll OeS~gn gua fie ui iiie acnmui ?ion, (e) The revisions to the proposed plans as recommended by Design Review Committee are appropriate for meeting the goals and design criteria of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Commission and this Council during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Count it hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed pro sect is not sn arrnrd ws.~, rtio objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site .5 located; and (c) That the proposed project is not in compliance with each of Che applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (Al That the proposed project without the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal. 3~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 611111and, Public Morks Inspector SUBJECT: Review of Ingrovewent Agreew,ent Extension request for Tract Nos. 10827, 10827-1 and 10827-2 located on Man:anita Drive hetwegn HaYPn Ayam_n a.A ua...Nea Ivnngn e,dx~ifhoA by Oel[n Industries This is a continued itea fron the City Council ax~eting of MAy 16, 1990. Attached is the Staff Report which outlined the Mstory of the protect and staff's recaaaaendatlon. The City Attorney will be Baking the presentation and rendering his recowaendatlon. Resp u ub~aitted, f nW. P. AIu ..~ AttachAent `'. ` ~--~`P 7 t.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 16, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Giitiland, Public Norks Inspectar~- SUBJECT: Review of Improvement Agreement Extension request for Tract Nos. 10827, 10827-1 and 10827-2, located on Menzanita Drive between Haven Avenue and Honensa !venue s!~L~1 *ted nv nelrn In!tuetr~ee RECONEIMTIOM: it is recommended that the City Council NOT approve the Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10827, 10827-1 and 10827-2. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Improvement Agreement and Securities for Traci Nos. 10827, 10827-1 and 10827-2 were originally approved by City Council on April 17, 1986. There have been 4 subsequent extensions approved, keeping the protect current. However, each extension led to initial legal action due to the Developer intentionally failing to comply with staff requests to extend the Agreement. Tile ieLLera Lnai were receivee from weico Jussi iymg the time exsension all stated that certain construction items would be caegleted in a timely manner. Relco has never met those time deadlines. Furthermore, in June 1989, City Council approved additional occupaneles on Tract 10827-2 in which one house would remain until the remainder of the improvements were complete. As of this writing, the Improvements remain lrrcamplete while an entlro Year Ms elapsed. Relco Industries has shown no goad faith W complete the improvements and continues to argue with staff over construction items and Conditions of Approval. This has been an angoing problem which has seen no rmeeQy. At this time, the City Attorney has been eonLacted and his office has been proceeding with a demand against the securities. IL is tMreforo recamaended that City Council not approve an Iaprovement Agreement Extension. Rasp 11 subritted,~ Attachment DATE: June 6, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SU&IECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Sapphire Street, submitted by Hillside/Sapphire yenwre RECONIENDATION It fs recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. It is also recommended that Lhe City Council allow NO occupa~rcles until all improvements on Hillside Road and on Sapphire Street are 1001 complete. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13728 were approved by the City Cowrcil on October 20, 1988, and a 5 month extension was granted on November 15, 1989 in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: f713,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5356,000 The developer, Hillside/SaDDh1re Venture, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Eztension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Res/Dp tted, "'''~~~ / / / .. i v Attachments NORDIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY April 26, 1990 Steve H. Gilliland Public Works Inspector City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Imorovement Agreement for Tract 13728 Dear Mr. Gilliland: Apparently when we attempted to submit the Improvement Agreement extension, you requested that we provide you additional detail regarding dates of completion of the off-site improvements. A substantial portion of the improvements have been completed. We still need to complete final street work, a portion of the storm drain system, and the off-site storm drain at Sapphire and Hanyan. The off-site storm drain site has been walked with Engineering. The progress of construction has been relatively orderly to date. To take into account for final pick-up list items prior to exoneration of the bonds by the City, based on previous -~ ^-"C ai~ii vi eiw wvu ~i,o. ea vvnvi 95& of the items will be completed within 90 days. If you need any additional information, please give me a call. We will gladly walk the site with you iP you think that is necessary to make you feel comfortable. ~.im~~~ very truly yours, HILLSIDE/SAPPHIRE VENTURE, LTD., A California Limited Partnership :. ~, :; p 1990 ~'~~!'~E EdNG t)IVwun, }LIK;dll GILL .ITR cc: office By: Nordic Development company, Its General Partner Harr J. Keto, Secretary .,.., .,,~.....n CIARRMONT. 01191 )11 ma n.ylM 370 RESOLUTION N0. RO .,a~Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13728 MHEREAS, Lhe CTty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamohga, Caiifornia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on dune 6, 1990, by Hillside/Sapphire Venture as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Sapphire Street; and NNEREAS, the instaliation of such improvements, aescribed in Seiu Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, 1s to be done in con~unctlon with the development of said Tract 13728; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City CouMil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the N~yor 1s hereby authorized to sign said improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 37( - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 6, 1990 TO: Meyoc and Nembera of Clty Council FRON: Diane O•Heal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: CO118IDBR111'Idt O! TIMB CAPBVLE AT CIVIC CBNTBR The purpose of this Staff Report is to provide information to the Council _n _pA:..~ the ei .v lun~h ni limns ens Ilse in. •F~ t~~ n ~~ The time capsule will be placed behind the dedicstion plaque at the new Civic Center end will measure approximately 1 foot by 3 foot cube. Additionally, for the Councll'a coneideratLOn, Ls the length of time the capsule should remain sealed. Tha Council mny wish to consider 50, 75, or 100 yearn. Also, staff hee asked each Clty Camaiseion and the loundation to provide a suggested lies of Stems to De placed Ln the time capsule. The following items were euggeated: • Video fran Chaffey Cazcla Nouee Restoration • Grape Herveet Brochures • Hubbell Telescope Launching • Eereh Dny Hewepaper Article • -emographlc Profile of Comnunlty • Formal Letter [o the People Opening Box • Philosophy of Clty • Copy of AB 939 Legislation • copy of Jason Hueng'e Environment Eeeay • Current Hewspepei • Publicat Lon [ran Etiwends Historical society • Lions 1990 Yearbook • Yearbooks frao other Organisations in the City • Church Bulletins r'e Conaiderat ion of Time Capsule at Civie Center Suns 6, 199D Page 2 • eott le of Pierre Biane Wine • A Seequlcentennial Pin and Calendar • Clippings from the Lone Cypress Tree • Current Issue of the Grapevine PuSlicat ion • Involve Local Schools for aridir ionai input • Pictures of Dedication Plaques at Red Hill and Heritage Parka • Copy of Cu [[ant General Plan and First General Plen • Plastic bottle to show what they looked like, with explenatlon of our recycling efforts • Hieioricel Tlme Line of Clty Development and Park Development • Minutes of Park and Recreation Commission Meet Loge • Photographs, including Aerial, of City and Parke • Parke Guide • Grapevine(s) to show Recreation Programming • Pamnnraohice of City and Pertinent City Surveys • Any pertinent matazlal dlatributed when the City wee Incorporated • Video of the City • Bottle of Nina from City Vineyard • Prssesd Laaves of Ciffetent Citrus Groves and virayard6 • Cucamonga Potato (Racks) • Local Newspaper frao the Dey of the Dedication, Photographs of various erase of the City, Polaroid Pictures of the Dedication Ceremony • Pictures of City Nall • Copies of a 1965 Nsst End Osnernl Plen May from San Bernardino County, an August Ze, 1978, publication of the Proposed Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, • 1901 Executive summary of the Draft General Plsn 373 Coneidaratiun of Time Capsule at Civic Center June 6, 1990 Page 3 • Copies of ell Promotional Videos that the City has produced • Working Plana for the Aagional center, Copies of nll Specific Plane, and any Nel9entoae prepared apacificaily for the Ceremony Staff anticipates sharing addiLion41 euggeetiona from the Environmental Management Co:msieeion at the time this staff report ie presented on Juna 6, 199tl because ihia Camtaiaaion meats after the June 6, 1990 agenda La prepared, eepectfslly auhm tad, Diane O'Neal administrative analyst DO:tlr Do\262 ~', 37~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE; June 5, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: REPORT ON STATUS OF GARAGE REOU IREMENTS IN MULTI-FAM (LY PROJECTS. On November 18, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 211D which established new regulations regarding parking requirements for multi- family residential developments. Specifically. this Ordinance remiiras t~,at at ieeei iii or the wtai required covered spaces shall be within enclosed garages. This new requirement applies to apartments, condominiums, townhomes, and duplexes. The City's Development Code previously gave developers the option to provide one parking space per dwelling unit within a garage or carport. The Ordinance also changed the City's parking requirements for apartments to make them the same as for condominium and townhouse development (the former parking requirements for apartments were slightly lower than for condominium/townhome) as listed below: APANTMENT PARKING P.EQUIREMENTS Old Standard Ordinance 211D Bachelor/1 Bed roam 1.3* 1.3/1.5** 2 Bedrooms 1.5* 1.8** 3 Bedrooms ?.7* 2** 4 or more Bedrooms 1.1* 2.3** * One space in a garage or carport ** One spate in a garage or carport f50X must 6e in oaraae) All new multi-family projects approved after Ordinance No. 211D have met or exceeded the 50R garage requirement. ec ully tt ~.3 ' B le City tanner BB:DC/j fs Attachments: Ordinance 211D City Council Staff Report - November 4, 1987 City Council Minutes - November 4, 1961 ORlaNA1Ci 110. 311D AN ORDIBA]IQ OP 8E C[Sf m011C8. OP 186 CIS] 0/ RAi®0 mruolol, cdlxeavll, 6rnaD]D aplxOPla[f ma 61alOOR 6D. e]-oa, dlmNIta NCiiq 1].l3.odo eNSAaIC TO t.1A~1' dLid'JSIM Rlmlia ND eMQ.OBm Od1eDN. NCSZ011 1).06.090 PN'CtINNT,p 10 OIIIOeL ad]Gi GDIDO.IrN pe PNQIR YW, I8D elIBIOi 1],OI.Oq NeSAaili: 18 ImILOM INIa1fxLL Di1S 9Ili OI 3N aY6iAPidli ma OY 181 CIii OP edllao mC11UW, DeDLYia 8p. 311 i~1e16, w tW 11th dv of OttebM1 IN], the Yl•mioi furiseiw held • A111 •derteiwd pWlie hwdnl pas•uvt [o e•etler 65!61 0! cbe Crlitotri• Coettrwt Cade •rd reet~teded to cbe Cdt] Cored •bKiw o[ wditiwtiwr to tM CltY't reltlPle lerllp gehioi etmd•ed• and rWrr ®ie else fat tlrlle /rill eridree•t. NeRi1e, r tpt IN dq of Mo.rtMt. 1N], eht C!q Cowcii b•id e dvlp •dt•te4•d pablie hwtivi pmesme to 9tMlov 65661 0[ th• Crli[omit .. _~_-_t !tom. 6[CfI011 ix 14• Webs 6imwp Clep Cowcll hu u4 th• tellwiei ti•Qiry•t ]. m•e eW Arevi••t L r•rn.ted eo Ntnit LprotN Nihdri ••d rwidrtl•1 rit e1•e •trrd•sdtl t•d 3. Shrt tM pnPeted D•PelePtrt Code ert•dtue meld toe hrr •Sp!ltene irget r tG enitorrr<i tw 3. th•t W PrepetH DtteleNrt 64 drodwt !a L eo•lotr«cr r!M 4e Ierlt t4 pollciu of the Ce••srl plw. 3t 14e Wthe OrettrM Clc] Covwll W lord tWt chit pro5•ee vot <rwm • tllelticrt tdw•re frp•et w the enlavrwt and rreer•Nt it•rree o[ • 1tptlw Meltertir w MwrNr /, 19tl. 808, ]BNtlON, N IS iNR.ttDx 1. 16te pvtme to dectiw 6ltl0 ee 65633 of [hr ' Criilomlr Oorrarrt Cede, tWt cbe Ciq Corcdl et tM Ciq al Ituebo me•rerN besebP eppaww w [he Ieh aq e[ MtWe:, t9n, Dnelopr••c Ct4 /rrMrt e]-o3, rerdtoi 1•eriow u.1:.o10, 1].De.o9o em v.De.D1o u loiis.t A. 6wtis 11.13.010 63 tb•11 M rud•d eo eW u loilsa Clrttw deeelypwt (eoMrLtr terrhorre, rgteWU ate.) tri-Mt•ebW titil• [clip farm Sot ilr, gtie bare, drelw. ate.) tad whir brr gsbx (r) etedtox 1.! ot!-newt MaiW rgttr Ni wie od rbieb ar tNw A•Il b !. ypeep x weppst. (b) OM (1) htlmrl l.! o!t-tteNt Neblry thew qs r!t of rNth ow aqm tbil N !a • p•'•6e oe wteert. . 37~ ~ijt., 3',7. oratr•<• wo. ]lip e.p 3 o Plrt•r br••ka aN ap•eial pnivt •hrld W ioclnhd alovt th• rthiw •!•ir. Thr• !Heart aN fourreivt pacneva to eh• drivwq/parkly art rlgth.. o Iv Debt to opw ap •o[a o! tM WrtiV •rr [o Nj.r.vt 3aNarpN •rw aN r•duea wa •allq• .!face aloe N• dri~• aiala, oflrt nt!•t nrm•/rspvee• ar rconrapd oa 1•ytht drive •Lalr. :Dj Areblc•ttve•~ waya •ed canoe! rcructnzr wpuld a•61hit drape rhleh •n <apHDl•, avppartir• aN fa137 ivt•tratN lato wa r•rall arrLitrtatal than u Saplarv[N ehnuth w• [ollrivt prmLiorr o Dry •rrocevrr prrat diltd[aleix - i••pi•i pc•Pvrcara gptopsnn rlw wa orfµati d••ip Svtrt w th• .aia aerueearr aad th•rNx• [ha pwp/rcpt! •eramurr world a liai[N eo p-11 rn. o tarpna psap mon u an •lwe o[ hasp rytb aN nr to rrt• ugly pe[am. Y[aMra rr o[ .iaµ• .taw peep mot. .ewe M nathd. !fa panmir et lvera•aN await) em stet[ fee . wwlat err •iw laep arMn N prop mon. M uraAt eya<lttOp/ pa[<M Ot dp0[a tm n aortaanu and ahpld a •rolhd. e •plla•p•. •atlttrllk•• report haipa •htah p•[nq r addo. eaa-revere p•vpeir •n r[ mai[Jl• ChaxrcrLdr of a pat!!y area, e•WtrtW a•alp •lrrn ahria M lveatratN into tW •tennara eo t•rq a rra p•trwat aavrapt foe tM rrpurta. o SL•rap vain would W ha1pN .. r Iv[•pai par[ o! eh• repan •errcerra. D. hour 17.Op.Oq 1 - Mlalaw Oaallly pain tL• .hall h aa•aha eo r•N r follrat pl L IJI tlaW [aal1~ hsawN !.000 q.fe. 1,000 p.lt. 1,000 p.ft, halltata Dpi) A ataxia i••117 d•arLad hlliy lm shr l.pW q.ft. rq M av[hgLN rhr a dnalepws WlMn lvaoratin 1ralfeir fv err!, µae eM anhltrtaral Grip eh[art6 eN apparel of a OaNt[dral On hrlt pee Motlr 17.01.0)0. 377 CITY OF RADiCAO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C~~+MO~ =1 '~ °I 'IA `I~ ~';z VII ~ i> DATE: November 4, 1987 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner vin.iFC7• EuYlpr»wcurei eccrcwcpr Aun ncvcinoMCwr cn_nv_ aa~cunMCUr - - -~~ - amen n o e eve opmen o e o a y o ancho Cucamonga Ordinance 211, to revise Section 17.12.040 pertaining to upgrade of parking allocation standards and to require enclosed garages for all apartment and condaainlum prodects; and, to revise Section 17.08.090 pertaining to upgrade of General Design Guidelines for parking areas in multiple family development; and, to revise Section 17.08.040 pertaining to upgrade of minimum residential unit size. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the propos-~DeveTopment Code Amendments and issuance of a Negative ue~i or oi.ivu. Ii. BACKGROUND: In mid-1986, the City Council directed the Planning L'r~on consider modification to existing development standards as follows: 1. Bring aparta~ent standards in line with condominium standards (except for subdivision requirements). 2. Consider modifications of parking standards for all multi-family units to include requirements for enclosed garages. 3. Consider modifications to the mininum unit size for single family residences. In December of 1986, the Planning Commission held a workshop to review a number of alternatives drafted by staff for modification to multiple family parking standards and minimum uMt sizes for residential development. 45 a result, the Planning Commission requested staff to pursue amending the Development Code to reflect Commission direction at the workshop. I9]i CITY COUNCIL STAFF ..LPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87-02 November 4, 1987 Page 2 On October 14, 1987, staff presented recomaendations to the Planning Commission for upgrading the parking standard and minimaa unit provision for single family residential developments. rrt. aNALYSiS' A. Parkin Ratios: Staff had conducted a stogy and found that pa ng pro ems in multi-family developments were primarily caused by the inconvenience of barking area locations, unwillingness of residents to park in appropriate locations, ~+~~~~• s +wy iwfm areae rather than o::J t,)p::~f.~.l uiue5 ::•"dou :.] _• y^v. ... ..i any lack of guest parking. ~~ps a result, the Planning Commission directed staff to draft new provisions which reflected these findings. The proposed provisions therefore improve the locationai and design standards to make the parking areas more convenient and desirable to use. The parking space ratios were modified to provide the following: 1. Increased covered space requirements for 3 and 4 bedroom units. 2. Require at Least 1/2 of the covered spaces be garages (rather than carports). .~.. ..ci .-. ~.ur r. i.iui Vu.~i~ fVi i uc ui VMn Yi,i 1.i• These changes are reflected in amendments to Section 17.12.040A2 as provided 1n the draft Ordinance. The combination of apartment and condominium standards is provided by the deletion of Section 17.12.040A3, the apartment parking standards. B. General Desi n 6uide1lnes for Multi-Famil Parkin . The staff s u e ens ne a mu - am y comp axes are generally designed in two different concepts: 1) a perireter Loop driveway and parking areas, and 2) dispersed driveways and parking areas. Design review policies shouid promote the positive features of both types of site planning. Creative combinations of these two types of plans should result in prefects which exhibit significant open spaces and provide convenient parking locations. This direction resulted 1n additional design criteria for Section 17.08.0900.4 as proposed in the draft resolution. 2? I CITY COUNCIL STAFF ..ePORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 87-02 November 4, 1987 Page 3 Minimum Single-Family Unit Size. The City currently has a 900 sgsq-ft. m n mum un s ze or single family units. Smaller units are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit to allow flexibility. After extensive deliberation, the Coamission requested staff to draft an amenAeent for its considerattort xhich would increase the minimum unit size. This request is reflected in the proposal to increase the minimum size to 1,000 square feet. Homes smaller than 1,000 square feet would remain possible sub,~ect to a Conditfonal Use Permit. The draft Ordinance provides for this recammendatian by amending Sections 17.08.0408 and C. IV. ENYI RDNMENTAL ASSESSl1ENT: The Plannt ng Commt SSton has reWawended e ssuance o a ega ive Declaration based an a deterwinatton that the proposed amendments would not create significant environmental impacts. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a pu61TC hearing n e e a y Report newspaper. VI. RECOMMENDATION: It is receaaended that the City Council adopt the a ac r nonce approving the proposed amendment and issue a Negative Declaration. Res fully tie , (- City tanner 88: AN: to Attachments: Planning Coamission Staff Report of October 14, 1987 Planning Commission Minutes of October 14, 1987 Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-181 Draft Ordinance 3$0 .. Nwwber {, 3981 I•N 1 IOTION: Moved hp Dagatt, wmod•d b2 Rlv1 to tppsw• Mtolniov No. 1]i09 Motlw ureitd m•viw•12 S-0. ... n. mrvxwx1mrrv-, A.3ttasemrt Aan_Dnm.Detmrr mm Al~1-plmlf ~IALei-0i_ cirt I r_tit010 WCA1011U~ -- 'M s•:A::ot io Siii~ ii n! ih: Ijmi:lpil toh yvrc•lvinD t ehi MIi:iH:v of Bun un4tN nvI<11vt to<lliriw •od the erinrit !ot 4v loutlov •ad pentlov of curb [real Setw. (Itw metfewd [ra t0/73 ~ 1 Sutt report 30 Mlki Dneq bHneot Pltvger. (0303-01 DO AMEN) IL2w wt .eked if the vw •hopply/ c•nnn vwld hne tbw tedlStiw in<orport d ioto thw, Dnd Du1Lr, Clq Plewq nn•d th•t .hie could M pLewd Lar rv • nw pexkivi lot ti elev. LHeeuwlev tooR pl a en w mlw, wvelvt at thew •ed wswiet for [he P•cll Riu. IL)w Stwt oytwd the • C1v/ !or pmll< hwriop M1ken big0. vo rwpovw. ebe puhl le hwriv0. rn el 4 W1w Siwe did vot Ld w web[ ahaald hn• thew fecIIftiu. _.._ ..-- ___ .-- .. r.....ew w. sn. RpQPl 110, 17-376 A RCamU2I0N Op 30.1 CZTT mON OI 9tl ¢22 Of DANmO m G10N0A, CA42IOMIA. Altl1 ROIIAIlX1R m0i usnumri RI-01 ADMIq sXCr Il.a.o10 w T1t Otp60Ila1T m0 01 TIX Ct1T RANOdO mWO1CA P61TA1NDq 10 T[ATD NA0.MTX0 0.tCT2 010.2X0.9 NI'aIX mMMRCIN. MD OlRC1 a0Nt0. 00.DIMAMOi M0. 377 (lien ewd4 M 00.D{NANOI OI TXX C2IT 000NCIL Ol THD C3TT 0.AN010 m vd0116A, ON.I300.NIA. ADDING /tDTION 11.0{.010 1Nt MN(NO m0t1OWA IDNIQIAb ml\ RRTAIN3NC 10 let Illl dN0 6a2gLI0.81M![ OD 0.XCTQ.IN6 IACILIT$X MINIM t 1:irz UI NAlltiq mCA1gFA M)2ION: Mw•d q newt, wconMd bf ltgwt tv r•ire full rwdt tvE ut u<ond rudigp vi Ordiwnw Mo. 317 !ar Nwrber 11, 1917, bevl oe No. 07-376 ehvutd •LO me• beck •t tbt tiw !or •pprwtl. Ibtlov 4e6 uwnicow:l S-0. •..• (co) O. RNIRONI®ri~ MN0.Z1iMT AND-OXpQA1MIXf mDt AlmlDlmrf -LDAI--4]-03 = CI2f OI P:MOIO CUGVlINO: - M rm::•ai io ep~ bn:l:p::vt Codi of ah• Ctry o! A:vc6e -~e:r::p aidlueu 7tt, eo swlw !w[lo• 17.11.010 p.rnigivX eo vp•n6 vl p•rkivt tliowrlov cun4ede evd to .pain •vdowd pnpv tee ell epeevne and cogdwlel~a proJnnl •od, tv rwfw !•etiov 17.OD.090 ptR•iWv/ to upend. v! 0•vr•1 0••SIV Cal Yllwt for Wrkivt •rwe iv rut elpA [•0.f1I dn•lopr•nt •v4 to rniw A•crion 37.01.Ot0 pts[•toiep to up0.nh v! efpiuw wti4ntlal wlt tit., 9tttt report h A11w N•erw, Attoeltt• lltvwe. (0103-03 DC AMp) counetlwbn Nritht ut•d the d!lttrwu Sv ptr4lvD .pear. tee •pertaDntt. .dos scd ewr_vuaa. Mr. N•srw thud ehtn vu qo dltArwu. Ikfor 9twt [tit aht WI tbould M cop epcttte a to rhn [hq wn loakivt for wd vwbd t61• tddtd tt the Oidluow. _. 1 3~/ lYry Cvaetl Nfautrr Mwaabae f, 19{7 Pat/ 9 Nqw atwe oprwd thr awHy tw pebli< hwrly, than Mly w eYpeaw. tha public bwrly{ vu dewd. 1Ypw levee rand ehrt ®iR• amr 1,000 uul wt M allow/ elver ehar/ !r weap[lawl mHM ro ebt It mw aoe loot 1lha ![ !a w aap awwtloe ca W.. 'n/~ ORIOIIMR 110. 311-f (tirvt rwdtta M ORDIWQ OI iHI WCRO OldMROA CITS COONCii ArIRw1RC maonrNr wxs AlgitOf~ o-0s. At01DxIR 96CxI0N 17.I ZOdO mrAMm m~ IAO(tIO ALIAxArxeN srMwRro Mo maagD~ oduaee, asirmN tl.De.o9D PRRrAIYDF 'tO OCtIIUI Re16R WSW.MRt AR H/IIR' MW, MO etCTION li.0e.0A0 RRrA311CD ~70 ICIIIIaIrI AIalDOrrlAi mrsr aaR or 18R IRVV,onax ~ mts oI x{t an or Waeo mtAeowa opnxWd No. s11 IgTIOM! jjl1wwad by !toot, wrouGd bl Rfy t0 ralvr Intl taadto{ of Ordiwvw Ib. 311~IC rvd wt weoW rwdly Imo MwaMr i{, 1911 rltp raaroGd rbwgr. N/t!w award waviwrl/ 3-0. ehir rbodd M pLud ami adrartlwd pvbllc bwMeq Mauve H cbw{w MSv{ mom Svrtaad of wvwvt wdiwear. rra F. M1111IC1ijAL 000{ AIOIp~IIf - mrt~1_ IY40 40tltC110i - Y wrv6ree to t6l) pi:r ib:ii 'ot{-i6: -mow aarwt: nw1--~-Pi eeir tt w.naly e.ttLOa t0. .1]0 mod addle{ • eve laalw IO.Nd10 wthw4la/ ebr 1we-11Lrefaa rod raved at vAidw tea /oblie atrwer rw hit-rala. Mrtty Aeu1tlw avd 6 d/apNd Petiy aPnr. ttal! saprt hp tlebrd Iiweq Com ee[w t luprniaw. (l16]-01 pC i rRAI) uamcllrM levee aabd ha wdoa ebla Kohla ru. Dud ldlvr. 7 Plwwr Mtal • aunq W aet Mr tats w to bw wq rMldn thia Lw bus tbs it redA as daw w tb awl e! tla afar w tab as waaw aetiw w thaw aieo/tlae/. Couvetlrbe twwr rdA.v .a...___ ____ __~~_ _... ~......:+vrrutwa. Nr. puwew caY/eHl tb eMa na ]vat aeetbr cwt ee qt tMw thia{a talue an vt brew Mauve mould M tape an a[ •ltbwt roaawlvt eha 6hari[f'• D/parwvt. Mr. uron err rrbd rpprotlrtal7 aavl of thaw par uaat ha hwdlw. w avwand probbll 3 qe dq. wxor ttwt ogwd tba awela{ toe poltc b dy, Mdrw/ly Cewe11 mt Rq lcutr. f.lll Cewt !e plwoela, the adlatN chat tbn hb Mw 1 move rhwa it wr tape an o! >v dI. Mt r/prtd of woaar probia w twHeaga rbn tt !r • cad /e a. M adad tb Coacu oee to tale tbir 1lgtip. Mgor ltwt alawl tb publte hwNo{. Wpap Ciq Clart Ada/ rwd tb [ltla at Otdlwea No. x70. oRDIIIAIIa Iq. 7!0 (!Len rwdY/) \ _ M OeD/W6 DI SAD CIrf ODOMgL 0• xNR ctrl O/ Wa0 C0 t11N111GA AMCIDIIp CtAIlY 10.N 0/'At RM7D m(DICNOA NOMCIIA3 lD[i 1T AMYDiq {eCl'xON IO.N.l10 MD ADDt1Y A R Ntl ItClIOt lo, N.IAO ADlwORII1R tO SIIOIAliA2Di ~. MD/OR RONMAL 0/ /Y76tl IRON II/iI6 RItlRe A10 NIONNATt, /ARRq /AC]3irAe AND /MDIG/ID0 dRRf14 epAae, eI Dtem/AaD ctrl INIhOtiq 3$a- MANNEBINO ,~ BBIGUGLI~ L A W O F F 1 C E S_ J9HN0 MANN ERINO SAL BBIGUGUO HAND DELIVERED June 1, 1990 City Council c/o B[uce Abbott r. - _^7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Envitonmental Assessment and Development Review 09-12 - Davies Council Members: Please 6e advised that we represent Albeit W. Dav iea, Inc. This l.e±ter shall serve as our formal request that the above-[efexenced matter, cu[rently scheduled to be zeviewed on June 6, 1990, be continued. Mx. Mannerino has been out of the country. Me will not return until next week and will have insufficient come ~~ e~~e~== -°n-' ~~P Teview with the council members. Please reschedule the review of the ebove- cefecenced project and notify us of the new date. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, MANNERINO 6 BRIGUGLIO l By ~ A L ipp Paral gal ALT/eg 9838 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE 1101 NANCN9-CUCAMONOA, CA 91799 /TEL (7 U) 989-7109 /FAX (71/} 9~1.891U