The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990/08/15 - Agenda PacketCITY - COUNCIL ~~.~ A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7qI ptn August 15, 1990 ~,`iviC CRMer Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive nancno Cucamonga, C,aiiiunlia 31730 •w• City Councilmemben Dennis L. Stout, nrayo. Pamela J. Wright, Counrilmrmeer Deborah N. Hrown, Mnyo. Fru Trm Cherle6 J. Hugael, CounrilmrmMr WiOiam J. Alexander, conmdlmemee. •r• Jack Lam, c: ;~.+mr„F.: , James L. Markman, o~.~nvornrr Debra J. Adams, oa rare City Once: 969-1851 l.ione Perk: 980-3145 I PACE City Council Agsnda Auquet 15, 1990 1 All itus tubeitted for the City Council Agenda cost W !a ~~i writing. The dudline for aubeittiag thaw itos is 500 p.n. ~~ ov the Nadneaday prior to the weting. The City Clerk's II Office receives all such itsa. 1. Aoll Call, Baguet _, Alexander _, Stout ~, Brown _, and Wright _. Tbi• i• the tLw and place for the ganewl public to addteu the City Comcil. 6teN lee prohibits Lhe Citp Comcil Eton addrwsiag any issue not psevionalp included on the Agenda. The Citp Comcil uy reeeiw tntiaonp sad act the utter for a subsequent acting. Caeeenta an tv be 1Lited to five ed.vutea par individual. D. CONAArl CALSIIDAR The following Covent Glandar iteu are exgeled to W routine and non-covtrovaraial. Thep will W acted upon Dp the Guncil at one lice without dlwuutov. Avp itu cep be revved by • Councileeeher or neeber of the audience for diacuasion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. fi/30/90, 7/45/90 end 8/1/90; and payroll ending 8/2/90 for the total aaount of $1,654,050.04. :. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule ae of July 31, 1990. 3. Approval to authorize tM advertising the "Notice Inviting Aids" fM the 19tH StrOet lmpmv^ nt 6, frCm Archibald Avenue to Naven Avenue, to W funded frao System Development ponds Account No. 44-6637-8766. 1 13 19 city Council Agantla PAGE August 15, 1990 2 II RESOLUTION NO. 90-324 Z0 I ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND 6PBCIPICATIONS POA "19TH STREET ,euJSUm oenri"n gvTrogw 'nCflZEALp AVENUE I I ~ AED HAVEN AVBNVES", IN SAZD CITY AND ~ ' ~ I AUTHOAI2IRG ANO DIRECTING TFffi CITY CLEAR TO ~ I I MVEATISE TO RECEIVB BIDS ~, ~ I, II ~ !, 4. Approval to accept Installment Note in the amount of 24 ' I ~ :33.'24.3 :z;.~a 77zatarn 'Haste IOdaetriaa fo: dcL'nq__ct ~~ ^ i franchise fwe for the quarterly period 7/1/89 to '' i 9/30/89. ~ 5. Approval of 8nvirorvosntsl Zn1tL1 study Parts I and II 26 '. i ~ for the Proposed Railroad Crossing Nidsning and ' ' Improvemsnt• at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fs Croeeing (PUG No. 2-96.7) an Hawn Avenue and the ~ Iesuancs of a Cataaorlcal Exemption therefor. j ~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-325 2~ A PBSOLUT TON OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONCA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING it THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS I AHD T* aNn •Carmure nv 1 ram~,vrn ~na• r. I I ~ I ~ POR TI0 PROPOSBD NIOENING AAD IXPROVEIIBNTS i I i TO THE ATCBISON, TOPEEA AND SANTA -8 j 'I li ~' RAILROAD CROSSING (PUG NO. 2-96.7) ON HAVEN i I AVENUE NORTH OP BTH STREET ~ ~i ~,I ~ 6. Approval to authorize the Department of General Servieee ~ 4~ ~ of the state of Csllfornia to purchase certeln materials, supplies, and equipment on beAalf of the City i i i of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 90-326 41 ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY I ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMOMOA, CALIPOANIA, AUTHORISING ~, ~ ~, TTfB DSFARTHENT OF GENERAL 35AVI CES OP THS ~ i STATE OP CALIFORNIA TO DUACHASB CERTAIN ~ MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, AND 6gVIPMENT ON B6IDILP OF THE CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONOA 7. Approval of eetClsmsnt o[ Eminent Domain ACiion (CO 90- 42 130)j Rancho Cucamonga vs. Etls M. Ellsna, Cass No. RCV OS3129. PAGE City Council Agenda August 15, 1990 3 RESOLUTICN NO. 90-327 i I a. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, AUTHOAIEING AND DIRECPING THB MAYOR TO EXECUTE SETTLEMBNT DOCUlBNTS RBLAT INC TO EMINENT OOMAZN CASE ;i0. RC.' 053.25 (CITY .~ nnFCri4 CUCAMONOA, ETC., V. BDA H. SLSNA, ET0., ET AL.) AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PROCEED IN CONPOANITY TIdRENITN ADDtovnl to execute an ops t.tin, a ___...__ (CO 90-13'_; between Security Pacific National Bank and the CSly to provide lender services under the Nome Improvement PLOgYam. 9. Appzovel to sward end execute a Profeaaional ServLnse Agreement (CO 90-132) for preparation of an infrnetructure phasing plan for the Et iwenda North Specific Plan area to Planning Nstwork Ln the amount of 59,075.00 to W funded £rom Contract Services Account No. 01-4333^6028 (PY B9/90). i0. Approval to award and execute letter amendment No. 3 to the Profeuional Services Agreement (89-043) for the preparet ion of the Btiwands North Speelfic Plan Environmwnra+ Tmn.rt ee..,.a ~~te w..,..., _,...a.._- Aeeociatee in the amount of $46,019.00 of^ which $24,311.00 will be funded from Account No. 70-276-545 and $21,708.00 will be funded from Contract Services Account No. 01-4333-6028 (PY 89/90). 11. Approval of Improvement Agreement and improvement Security for Tract 13280, located north of Baee Line Road between Milliken and Rochester Avanuae submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 90-328 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVINO INPROVEP.ENT AGRSEI[ENT RRD INPROVEMENI' SECURITY POR TMCT NO. 13280 12. Approval tD vacate a public utility and drainage eawment on a portion of Lot 5, Trnct 10045, loeeted ai the terminus of Almond 8tratr Meat of Haven AVaue, approxLnately 20-fai wide and 285.22 fat long (APN 1074-123-21). 42 nn 67 49 50 51 53 PAGE Clty Council Agenda August 15, 1990 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90-349 A RESOLUTION OP TFRL CITY COUNCIL OP TF78 CITY OP RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUlBIARILY ORDERING TAE VACATION OP A PUBLIC VTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON A PORTION 08 LOT i Gi •M 1VV~J 33. Approval to accept the Renyon Park Project in the Victoria Planned Cwmnunity. RESOLVTION NO. 90-330 A RBSOLVTION OR THS CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RLNCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTINO TM8 PUBLIC IMPROVBMBNTS OP TH8 KSNYON PANR PROJECT AND AUTHORISING THS PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THE HOAR 14. Approval to accept Improvements, Ralenu of Bonds snd Notice of Completion for: Trnct 13445. located on the northwest corner of Vict i Perk Lene and Aocheetar Avenue Releeus Pw i~hfal oe.fnnmwnro qnM ,a~.m~l cioe nnn nn '~, ! i 'I Accept: I, ! Maintenance Gunrantee Bond (Street( $ 74,400.00 'i RESO&UTION NO. 90-337 A RHSOLOTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP IUNCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT 13445 AND AUTNORILINO THB PILING of A NOTICE OP ~ COMPLHTION POR TNB NORR Tract 13810 locsted on tM no LA ids f Xllle'd A d ~ at Ram Court Releue: Faithful Perfornunce Bond (Street) $174,419.00 Accept: Ns intenance Ouerantee Bond (Street) $ 17,445.00 54 57 58 59 60 61 City Council Agenda Auquet 15, 1990 PAGE RESGLUTION NO. 90-332 62 I ~ ' A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COVNCIL OP TNB CITY I I OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING I TAE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR TRACT 13310 AND AUTHOAIEING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP ' l ~ ~ CO!Q'LET_ION POR THE NOR3C d i ~ ~, parcel Ha0 11030 Unde Oroundin0. located on the east 63 aide of Haven Avenue between Paothill Boulevard and Deer ' I ~ I j ~ Creek Channel ~ ~ ~ Aeleaee: ' l i ~ Faithful Performance Bond (street) 5616, 601.OC I ~ I Accept: Maintennncs Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 61,660.00 64 AESOLVTION NO. 90-333 A RESOLUTION OP THH CZTY COUNCIL OP THL CITY i OP R11NCN0 COCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PO3L IC IMPROVBlQ;NTS FOR PARCEL MAP 13030 ' i I UNDERCROUNDINC AND AUTHORISING TIDI FILING OF A NOTICB OF COMPLETION POA THE NOAE ~ .._--.. ..__ .. - _. 65 <~ ~ ~~ intersection o Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue ~ < ~ I ~ Release: Faithful Performance HonC (street) $110,000.00 I I R880LUTION NO. 90-334 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVE!ffiNTS FOR PAACBL MAP 11341 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND AUTHORIZING TN8 FILING OF A NOTICB OF COMPLETION POA THE WORE I I i ~ 15. Approval to accept Improvement, reluee Of Naintnmce 67 Guars ntew 3oDd fnr TriCt! 12650 and 12650-4, 1vLatOd at the southwest Corner Of CanLtl Avenue and ONr Canyon Drive. Tract 1$650 Maintenanw OuarenLN Bond (Street) $ 21,000.00 Tract 12650-4 Maintenance Ouarantse Bond (Street) $ 36,000.00 PAGE City Council Agenda Auquet 15, 3990 6 The following Ordiwncu have had public hearings et the tine of first reading. eernad raadinge ass expeetW to be sontiw end Yon-coatro~ereial. Thq will M acted upon bF the Comeil at Yw ties wilhoat diacnuioa. The CitF Clerk rill road the ----G. ii.T l.w uiu rMi tBiYrYd LOr di/CYU10Y• 1. CONSI DBRATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO INDUSTRIAL SPECIPIC PLAN A.~?NDNENT 90-02 - CITY OF RA.NCNO COCAMONGA - A request to amend the land use regulations for 9uDarea 5 tc conditionally permit Automotive Pleat StoregY. ONDINANCB NO. 423 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TNB INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND TNS LAND USE REGULATIO118 FOA SOBARBA 5 TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT AOTOMOTIVE PLEET BTORACE r. ADVEAx2eED puELlc aAalMga waYY 1:..~ ueq YeeY ed~erCieen evY~er pp\tq am public beariwla a raquirW bF Uw. The chair will open !be uatiag to seceisa public totleoYF. 1 RESOLUTION NO- 90-335 A AESOLUT ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OB THB CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING TRACT NAP NOS. 13565, 13565-6 AND 13565-9 68 68 72 73 2. CONSIDERATION OF VACATING A PORTION O! EINIACR AVEN[R. ~ 76 Ciiy Council Agenda August 15, 1990 PAGE i ~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-336 ~~ A A6SOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIC CITY OP AANCHO CVCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO 66 VACATED A PORTION OP RINLOCR AVENUE I LOCAT60 SOVTN OP HIGHLAND AVENUE ~' C 3. CONSIDBRATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSHSSMENT AND BTINANDA S1 I i SPECIFIC PLAN AlRNDlBNT 90-01 - CITY OP AANCRO CVCANONGA - An emendmsnt to the Etiwanda specific Blan pertaining ' io Lhe proposed remOVnl of existing Hucnlyptus windrows ~ ~ -- _ r-nu!t cf the al iy.-~52.-.: .iu~wui! a~~wr:_e waa~ .,~ ~ ~ Etiwands Avenue and other street alignments. i OADINANCE NO. 626 (first reading) 101 AN OAD INANCB OP THH CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCNO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STINANDA 9PECIPIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, ANHNDING PIOVR6 5-13 AND SHCTIONS 5.33.306(+) AND 5.41.201 O! THE 6TINANDA SPHCIPIC PLAN PERTAINING TO Tlls PRESERVATION OP HVCALYPTUB NINDRONS, AND MAEIM6 PINOINGS ~. ~ I IN SUPPORT TNERHOP ' I ' ' ene~m vw~_rn~ n The following itge haEe no legal puDlieatioo nr pontia g I rpuirerents. The Chair will open the renting to receive public teetiroaY. ~ 1. COHSIDEMTION OP AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PUHLIC ENTRY lOM1 i ANO OCCUPANCY OP POSTBD CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCB NO. 625 (first rending) 105 ~ ( AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY i O! RANCHO CVCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, REGULATING PUBLIC ENTRY AND OCCUPANCY OP i i ~ POST&O CITY PROPERTY H. CITY MAIUOER'E ETAPP BEPORTB The following itre do sot lepally require qy publio tnetirooy, eltlwagh the Chair vP open the reetiap foe public iapnt. PAGE Ciiy Council Agenda Auquet 15, 1990 S 1. COlIS LDEAATION TO APPROVE BANNER A_PPLICATIONC aNn 108 2. oaCOtR.~NpATION TO.Aw!ND TAE A>NNCA twfr.T[!V CONSIDERATION OP CONTAIBV'~'IN 5 000 00 TO T Z 130 BNPLR¢ DBS ION INSTITVTH 3. CONSIDSAATION TO DESIGNATE A VOTING A¢PARRANT>Trw >un I i31 iN AITBAN>T6 TO BS PR_ 6NT AT TN8 BUSINSSS SPSSION OF TNB ANND OP C. IPO 2A ITIE CONF¢ NC¢ ON I 4. OCT08ER 23. 1990 CONS'DEA TIOFi ^O IY-AODCC^ A.'D 'E- D'^" FOA PUS LC 134 HEARING ON ASSZDENTIAL lIAB SPRINKLER ORDINANCE - City Council introduction of the ordinance 6t' reeding of title and aettinq date of Septomher 5, 1990 for public hearing on an ordinance requiring automatic fire sprinklers in all residential bulldinga and certain related accessory bulldinga. ORDINANCB NO. 026 (Introduction) 193 AN OADINANC6 OF THE CITY COUNCIL O! THE CITY i oP RANGED CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMBNDINO TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRVCTI011r OI TH6 IUNCHO CUCANONOA 11UNICIPAL CODE AHD ADOPTING BY REFERENCE 9TANOAA03 NlPA 13D AND NPPA tae mvrw Door yawn __ _,._ „______.__ .. _ Ttta a PROTECTION ASSOCZATION, REQVIRINC THB INSTALLATION OP AVTOMATIC PIAB SPRINKLER SYSTBNS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES ANO CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY THERETO, KITH CERTAIN AM¢NON¢NTSr 0¢LETIONS AND 6%CEPTION TO SAID CODES ', 5. STATUS REPORT ON THE F001'NIr. BOCrt.EV A ROCHBST¢A ZOS AVENUE TRAPlIC SIGNAL The I. COUNCIL BVEINEBE following SLNa Lave hoe requotsd bF the City Comeil for diseusslan. That' era ast pubs ie Leering itus, although the Chair uy open the uetiay for public iapui. 1. DI$ODSSIGN OP BU$ STOPB ON AV¢N A - n (COAtiauad f[ae 202 Auyuat 1, 1990) 2. CONSIOEAATION OP ALL LONIN6 CAaN068 BEING APPROVED BY 203 TXE CITY COVNCIL PAGE City Council Agenda August 15, 1990 This i• Lhe tiRa for Cit} Council to identif} the itus the} wi•h to discus et the Hart Ranting. Thos SteR• will not M di•cved at thin Rnetiog, ovl} ldentifled for thn anrt Ranting. This is the tine •ad place for the geDeral Dublic to address the City Councii. -ut• iuw pYehihite tae Cit} aunt ii iron •ddre••ing aD} issue Dot Dre~iov1} included oa thn A9eDda. The CiL} Comcil u} maiw b•tiROn} avd set the MCNr for • subsequent weting. Ce~ente are to W liaised to fire ainutu per ivdi~idual. IDRTIE6 TO ADJODEIf TO EIECOTIVE P66EIOE TO D2ECDEi P6E8070~. 101TTER6. i2LCUTIVi EEBe20N TO ADJOVe11 TO A JOUR 106TIE0 RITE TEE EINIROgRMlAL 1011010~IT CDNIIEEIdI TO M EII.D OE ADODeT IZr 1990, 7100 P.M., IE TIR EAVQ AV6NE COE-EE>71CE EOOM LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CRNTEE DR7VR. I, Dnbrn J. Adams, City Cierk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that n iruO, accurate .copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 10, 1990, enventy-two (72) houro prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 et 10500 Civic Center Grive. atl Jw 2w0 V~ a ~p~ •S• ~P: ~On nix Y ~ n w i ~ i ~ ~ I12~ ~i~ ir• •O• Ili1 1We f 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ = = :. goapN~nmasaaapNNap+moaNOppp :+G 4=P..^.fp~n: ~:~m my0v0 nnanpnNiPONnFNmrvTamONn1P OONrvNP N N N a a w N~=w n wymmNma ~1T SwNO~N+ ° 9 m a a N NN N.4N Nry p0 n n n A /1 r\ h h N J'iJNNm•N• aPO.pppnO+M+NaNanOPO~Nm+Nanap YOYN aNa ~Tap .a.ppN.a Nay yny BO~OO PCCOnNTaNawOPO Nm~NnNV~~~}~OwN11Nn~~TNmN NVNiw 1NI~NNNM~gN11 a1 VAN Y~Y1nNnYni vni YwiNrNNV01 a°aaoaaaaooaaaa<ao+aoaaoaooaaaaaa giiiii~+aiaiaiiiiiaaaaaaa++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa+aaaaaaaa• V lilil I I lil L P a .~ r 'a i • + i~ i a a • + Oa V JV v f V v V i N VOVyv L >< V W W F •i t \ n J O S i i L f W W U Y N rii w S a~ 2~ i f V '. 2 O J U V J 2 J _ a J N a a w ) i s w Y s ^l W O 1 N O F f C i p ~ ° u_ ~ N O W V a n .<i u M1 aa~ • N O 9 • O Y f L l V W N _• } eNt • V U J '1 O } J O • a m • nl • O ~ N N N 1 }2 if <•f < f O S PN ~ n u \• e i N s • _ no u • n V w ~ i N O[ > J Va0 L MIJ t Y • 2 V p\ VaN i 6 O W O rtp N N e :Y W:: Y.~::o~« ~~N~ 'M « u.la Nu •LPN~N < nz \~NF•i• N Ni i_WW wpl in~.\i~J r}nip a JN ri _ JwiWJn OVFY nl JPNOY: pMY •iNV\}aNipW\nngWN600pR< wmVin~Z>yWNZNnIn<p)OKnV<J\: J~Na _ LL> aNNwi p0\x6Nw }MF NG YY xV p Nx9UN:aiO w'+SiwN YpZn~nNNVNWwwxNJWJUNUI~+JZgf uVwWi000YJ Z >ZLG ft< JSO w J n NwfYpWhff00 F9Nn pnJNJUnn "' WnN~uuza .W. pJi~"y\ i°z wiz°i~ Jnana.•.Na.iaioaJiw°x'xa~i+ pu1VNwY•V~Ii2n:GjUweO~2NLLNSN2YwW<p W•N)~•••Opp< • iN)<W<Wj2 33VN0 YYaaVViV6VL6VNaVV6Ix p6VaNJ N M ~ N O~Sn l p V • VSYSW l Np ^ V x0• p >p JL UY<yYy wJ 'IpIN t LLJipY~• V ti~ SY pi N < LVMV p 9 wJJLV Jw J iN6i<pNV J •N N V YNpYVNO1W<NVL ~p NYVNOfL)fZJ iY~ ~YWiJ N ~ n• <yWri~lif U1V1YW<t'J ~<OWi•UMn H W O • v1 NMWtC W< a 7~i p W) •S NJMS N•WW~}Y• i~ NM~~ZintY i 2• OJ t nOi V•<nn •Y< iy< + •<f< '1OW00<• M1M •Y LNy N9JN J<fitY YNniiO•n}W ~ inINW YYJ O F••JV•LlfiirO~N<~M _p W_M1O<W~f ~MnOiVMfN Sl p y WJ•NN N~F`iJY~t WY<}O fW~<Yp~VF YiW ZFN L)IV } J JfN VJGMWVYNNniiNViWYNOJtfWMN iVJVJM} ~<~•<~<•<~0~~•~}i•VVVYVYVVUVVp00~ 1•.1}. ohn~vr°-. ni~ml~iisiiie~~t.wiiil}.n wwn ^~N}~N•^.N••M MNm~NN NaNM1N< MNgNa 6 :iE ~~ mNio n NN.Y. °.m naN nN"N ° y F N '~°a m F a ~v~~i :un w . . . Ny . . . . . y N, Y i N ^ .. yy n N Y N a ..^ .. m z. a NahwweyNm+Na aNO~-mwP naNanmweyNm+N aFm mRNSY°~MGY'.°AU',NY',&Y°.:$YP.Nh$$$$$$$$$S.^o'+^ea^ye a^a .'Y'e'a eam"a a$oa eaaa eaeoaeaeaeoaaaaaa~~aa~aa~ + aae oadao aa ~ ~~ ~ ~ °VVa+• VV+VVaVV++Vi••iVV +• • aVV f• •• +iiiViV+ 11 • 1 • • l l 1l ) Yi\ Vn[ \SO y Oe ^ V i OnI' } \ I ~ 7i V 0 ' n V O w Frl 1 a w ~ W Y u 1 w0 ' f J m2 {w ¢ llOm J O\ i S^ I } 11 w J } W PV J2~ y ~F 4 J~CF 40 :i m Y IW 0 ¢2 N wLL 29 y y SN i~l +: c 1 wVl yJ SLN e : ` a : i ¢ N > ¢ ~~ e~i~ a\NSC U1 J N L?W ° m zJWO ~ p iSU y °n 'Ii u 1'J°+ NI o ^ mio z ° ~~ ° W v tyJ m N.. Y . ~ ee ~ i e °m ~+ ~>I i npJJgsa~ my} ¢ >l\ z n _ \ N Y •u u V7J V N v ? ' Zr.ne j 'l u=jOVn¢1 V ) - JY< uRJ + iVw Y L YJ~n rn Z y ' : o V VOm u ~- FY'u p<o wZJea yi¢• y f*24. v 'ramaue¢+orenl- L sv w^eYVL¢N2 iNU ¢ p pGeV iV¢Fp6J i i ~ V S ~ T • S _ y h V V y O ± ~ l y U _ t w6w JLFJ6 V 2 J Au Z N u •r Y n i NFV h 9UN JW M M< O ) y Y •OJ T.AN• J jn0¢w U xw e¢lL ¢ ,c J~ VO y O\ N ` n II Y } 6Wy0 f ° y yyY- h2y1 h u f;u e[ :VF 9} y nNVG'Y J AV } SV'i L J J 9 ul[J I t ~ Y ~J yy ` Ny6\NZ i~F V6WyiN T' ijUW6 fYii2030MiZSY 2f~0 f~~ i x Y Y JWUw YO 90y 0< i'Y\ CI•m L NOYNS}fwfW^V N ^ W I Y VSI 00'Y VY •\OVFOIIL N. ° }ii 6h a\OyVY}\YN'J WC ~}i\ Y -J SLVSUOYJH~MwJ~~Q~N°<LL~A \uVi~N)~~ <iYY •OJ J t OVOVnO Jf Y Y r Y nJ OL'y1WNNf NJY+iJ OJA1O(1 fi} pwONN LSO JNWN6U• ONfJ W ~ : \ _ V<Y~YVJW i wV0 i~YJ¢ JOI 9JN4 FIY»VOyM M1• WtiYOWN~} } ONNNJM1I• Yi fiN J Vw y <UWN\yVOJOf<W06JheJhLION)JYa1}OOtO}}iVi}YVi{092>V NJ 1 lY :S. : Vyy.(i6lWyJiO}{f M0^iL~Iijjjf<V°p <V S1fyJ0 •yi0 i OOOW'Yw wIL WIL IIOVYYi:sy^in[LL LLLLL:~:LOOeO....../NONNN YOti YO me.F.n.limrm.~N°}m.IPnNaaaNmNw..wm+eeNwnwPwwnNNnw sr.a+NNI. I. N ONwPYNmONfaw YONy NiTaNP VN^}Nw°NyM^V°Nn101n^ YN OII ~ NN y^»nln»~yN00<rY-Y<^^V NNaMN^ryNVayTTn~PNNT N°ONV eT T ` 111 ^ n^ mmY NN -Y T N N Tq nNNy ~w: a:o~~w :_: ::-; - = P a a.l e9~+ N N .. i, . ~. + + NdNEy~~NV >W OVa~Ia Va.If <aVVJ• ' V~ ~ u nJw 0[\<Y Z w N~< zu v a sue: .. \ zNtla a crew < ~., t x ., o s .~ MJv ~iJnw9 aJYZ VNNNwe f w _ L iiOJ e; w2Mtli aLLntlltl tl0> pJ pig ~XGn a i~+ ' nl 71~ oU6pSSOWLLZ V J'Y J N n y NII6 JZ9 a21 ~ 70 NV~U TIC JTtl FJ XY+ nnJIZVUVL¢UfOi J7 J JJ JF isu upW ~. z z n.. .o i L LOLL oJV nn '< ••SN 220E "f~9 ~t~ <J •1~ •+<O iw I 1 V~IF Ziu M1ie p'N uy OOp<tl7pNnH inw tiN Utl iNNtl t<N ~J01 MY<~VNV7J WuVpN JJi\O'Yp< iW• HVi06V w pio <Ww i<.lor eV• VJ<N iVe JJW tlOiViJ + f t W W i W W ~+ \~ e w t W11 VV~+•i<+•SLI ILO JO +S+ 9<Oti JpJJO MY[W +<+ oee~iN «'u oenWw +i• NNNN~fliilf iwN +Z+ NNNNTV<NtlA n~4Pw +e• Tw1<N •lil<NNNAI•eM •11I M4TTJTNn^N^I ~•INT W• :>• + 3 • O ;N 1P J2B ua <P up OY nd V w a. 6 ±i+ oaa~ ~• \ ~ Y II • f e lli• ~~ •O• •o• 611 ~N• e TaaaaNNeNNnoaaawNeTmnndaaonoanrTaapaoWPne haahoTNNePaI-n maN ..aP.NTONew...ama....NNTnp .s ~ ~: .:ee . .F n.'.~~:~n nr:paNari c.ee~:riMa+eo N N n nMNnrN NT .^a °oNPN N„YaaFNmaPryPmMrmar+ N T T N n nNrnaO aw w N N A A n n n 4N mav)1F ~4Nh{PO4NTaNan+PaNNaaNenmPONNTaNanmPOyNTaNanO as ~• PPPP o NJ,+.. T T was aan~nhnn~S9m2~eemSS:CmWmWY80Cy ~'i'!"i Si 9'a'"J e2:m~.^Ym m^Wa >TTT Tina oeaoaaaaaoaooaaoaaoaeaaaaaaaoaae+aeea+aeeaaaa oaarra+araa+areaaraaaraa+aaraeaaaaaaa•araa+rrraaaaa• V.I 1 I I I • • Y)• • • i. . . .. . m. mo°P w~T )~ {e U O ONa\.WP N O W f r1aPh)h N\ J p 11 TOTOT.O e O L\ O T V J ` • •Pa a aYa N by ^ J N i P ; \ N •~ iN \ ~ nNa Or M FVaVfVJV6V NJ yW N\ NYWW d W nV O 42 2uNi T) W FH JhiY «F J J • NN N6 ihr9 h CO U)h ) 7 O N n_Y MWW VNN_p Y\O V WiJ W__< _ ~Zuyr wOY JO WZ hNtW hYNI` ~ uii~ Ow N < i N)VVfJZWW) i YiWU •J N YINaNiWi V ` W 'O• u0 M<IYWN\O iaN Vr NY~ JdG N 1 tV0 J WlJ »VNM •YYIY O_i W Y 6ON[ OWOL G 7 N O i MWNJOO~ Yw Nip'JY i0 OWe O OZ W • S ~V~ OiYpZVNmiVV NSN ~J=iNWMYNOMnNiMtl4 YN n piWO)WON )I.WfN• 6 M VZM1 wI. Y.• NYIe 2 w <VN w JrNyw WY NNUI J Ni WniwwNr~+ U n{ J N iN hm~Oh Z i0~; WwYVepYiWp OOOTNiVJ w • p inffNOP M <O O . Nl{Y YN Ni iwJ ~ W~VJVY V SOV<ZTW Nnn{!WS inW'JNY:uN4 Ni Ct „ M1 J <JW WiN<w {4W JWNn7U VYW nJ. 9Y •JOJ O O VnaWN2JWhiniNiOnOUN000N){ t2NFfOpV{O YVO U r i W _UnYnOhiNnZfhnJ2UN IINO4Wi<_W iiNnNWry WNNJ V N ~ WU~Vwm<OOSWJOP J'VNa{tFHJ •~NpYMiJ;:O); pN n m J ) )UUCVhUY~9 ~w~d)JNfYNiNHN)Wwf F N _2 _ O uY f O 1 i i O VN t• YfVU O W 6 nWfi F N f N ti WW OM WpuriNN FF •t J n ~ ~t ~ uNi:t h^ OY MAYN •YNN ~• ~ H Y ~y SB NNOOWNN i O V•i M N `J)iY N 63NH~SpOiNV N iM O fyS W~ ) f m4 WVWW Oi NVfWWYYW • Nh i • 'JO p O O O O V N>S Jf rW hYWWYFJ VV JV i i W JNJMJiWY7 fVf Nrfe 4 •t YC ON FY p 9 NOWNYNNSS )IL rf OJ•fOrY MY W f Y JOi iYVh WONM iiyyW 1 FW O <r fN yi i` O WYrWrNf YW4 { ~haa Nr JJpf NY th Vyih VW a a a p W NN~NpYSVWWOhiO~YOHYUY•IN~iW MJr V1tIhL~W3Y ~4 N N N t WMNOiLOWW •n Yff WNNOY{fF{V;~ OL NNYf WVWiYi Y s O iYNiOWYYWW )W Oi iW N Y i Y 1 W Y • p V hiW<Y <{>i~ n tlN ii ~i i iNN WfOr• JWfJi p O n •WYYp LyM rnN • •O~NhOOYNp iN OYN Wf yfy11 XY11I Nf OiYO i ) ~ W W YW{~1 Yi000tWMiN niYH~i1WOJMOVyN~HMf~f YWyFW) JI ~ t 4JNJWVYNNYNJYp::nF yVM> iW>VWY NVYf WOiifO V V f N N Y{<~<f1f{OO aQVVyVVVUYy0000000pWWWWWWlt10LUV N ry ~ W ry ~~MI+V 10~1W NON YIT~1+NiONrn+{Y~TI)•OOONTONN I'NfMNO~vi~ N T a •NSP N:N M arW~Tny{yTN+N^NNNNN• AI n N N Nmn w rTN T N N i V iNn ne ~im e: I 00 uJu 9 ~i - ~: ZII ~• p• •OI •:. Y w n O w I • ' •i ii • ~ •O~ O• •(~ ~>II NPOOmNOONOrPNONnaaPNO OOaNa ah NO am000o NO 000tlOONNanO a anaowe/NN°a errNeawa Noe . e e oarwNea emee:: ria•ia:N~.iN1:al::n:w:.:e eeaaoe y•:.:o::NNem~enr aaamPeN/eNwn oeN wrNN/wwryNN~ wna.°.°e. nP ii.N•r~P NNYTaT ~e NaNr .1 N ONarm •• N aN P NNw Na tl MV Oh/POr•NTaNa••OPO••N TaNONfPOwNNaN r1..pONNm aN aNOp °`m222 sm2 S.Niaim~"aNaiNar n s SSS /SSSY92y2/ «rr n. CsLCSSR°<3°/a.°rm iaeeaaaaaaaaoaaairaraeaaoraaaaaaaraaaa~~raaaaaaaaaea oaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa VfLr• • •«f• S s Yf V fY P V O n W Cf ~. j I a u ° zQ~ ~ a ~ws • i w ON•YiYY wfWM°J W O\~ ie.\F i ~ N~YMY~YYMY<L••!J M W < \aN y •y >VWwWYWY L _\= P VN O\s PaY O L 'J O NNN NWWNrN NO N WMW w r V n •if<fW<NNf<Y•\W •1•Jfi \.• N \l1Lf N• n :. `:Yu. lf~~~i~'~'~~.`+iw°r °WO°li~ il>e~r w.\.NS u`~ii O iniYJYJJ Z •• MWJ<J i NO 'NYOW \ WO a J WWV Ki__yf •:IIIa.I NII{~•aW ~y w< O~WS a.VO O° Yi LWiiWW>J i N O F •xN"OOwNif O>IO OONNIW LJy IN :in/V<\{« <ifNO/~ ViOYfOf\• i „NY 60TY •i 1 y {YWF NYiY:V Yi •YL i Ta110 NO< 07 n000000YON LYYY •~~YNNW• YVM1 I m ~r i°fN><OrWWWWWWOYri00W°• Wr (YYOV YSSa0000hOW O ~~rY~L YiitiiiWiWO nfWmNJYW WOO OwY Nyml •w ~r }N i NSFV w.L>J_.NO J.•_<iNxVOa m00 r 2w W iuOW • • • • IiWV pJ~W F YW\NN 6FWW:JOIINO iW) 66 JWWWWWWWWOiYL/.PW 9(><MWniY 'J aapy 1 Y <Y`°::>Y)>)>OOtNONN>N Yi OYYJ<VViOIOr rw~ >OfY• « <f {•POY i'1WOf Nt<W>Y.JO }<OiViOYN~J a r Y si<~ a/<Y r.}°zNN /iir<r< rll .. rJOYL/z:zzzzzz rl <J Y~NY O~ Fa o.z .laeor< SY:(:~:/OYiiWWWWWWWWO<(VrOn iWM1i! Y WWV:: TmmW a YCt Y J4rWY>i»)»>PLWOY/VfN W•{NI. \f 6LN J wl I IM O Li •iiMf {_ «f< N JpJ1s=~=YOPPOOWi W nyT.•a< IY+1[NSNO•. Osi ~ZZZZ~ OOOWe OV.•fL»YjZf OrNNNaOi i i yy yyu yyW to uii Y Vi~iiOF• ~ ~JJ Y ° SU sOOVNU V {<V~VVLO•i~1 M nn •JJ nw rVN (NVY V n> WZ °WW V • WN Nr</YY • N N ^r V O_Y WNN V j is{fJ(SMOV IN Y<a• O YW O( q iJ1 NiJNgNr: N.O O N. J1L ifi `"' `:~ y 3~ ':3@3'7W°YaYSN]9 3x11 i;WWSN ~°Cy ::: N7JlY O :J/ VeF00 °i(>WNNYVOIyI Y_fNNWMO/W YVYi 111110 •OLOr } UW (NYitNr M<lJYbei YNiMONO>< NWW{ 7[>1'>[V ~OriVn V_ jNS(VN VVV>SINYV\N 1. Y{Rl wW YWLY GOON WrW< N MNNNNNNy•~~((NCWN9J yy+WYM yyW `Y •ON~jV NNN~ ~~ }Yi~W3g0000000NW rJY iYJ~~~~L < OOOi 0°O Y<{{NV>S7 .S Nr///+/O//JNOWWwWO •N<N(i`JNOWIYVUWOOWWWlM ~VY ~WY {O {jOF V N(N):OVY f9 ( rW~~yY> ~ NrN~ oN irrsrrrrrs lnYU i>YY u {JI Y•9 •YO/rWWWWWWWWMi WNMJO°r0< OO~YVYWYW •IJJJ<J U CN}W qW l SOOg000°q^»J NYYWYrI `OLii` YO+/iN<{{Yr >YJY i(Y 4 JJJJ JJJ~I {WNYw< OyVY EN YVY >pOr(LYi~t~1n~'J'J ~O'J OOt>VVYVVrIi~ iiigYArii(rr •{ Yq>tWwOI{><r<00000000~ Y{« «WNOgr{{<WMMt{<{WNOOOOI YL(Mq•tYJJJ((i((`((((i (Oilllllllll.rrrrrrNNNNNNNNNN TwN{NY°TP{P°+{/PTOaNnOhNNNNa/hPNwY(hINNNr'I wNONNNNIN M:aONMwN(aar«{<w{raNN<aw.INNMNNa.waMa{•IMaM1OPIVTTwN w /~Nw<TNTNTaaaaaaaTTTw wN. nNMM~wNaN~waaNmlary~TT N TTTTTNTN NM yTN 5 iN'w 1 ~i°n VYI 2LL0 u W :: ,~ ; s=: YII \~ •i~ <• ~ O• ~ i• ~• ~ i 110• •S• :mi iii w •O~ ~i.i :.°Ii iui o~ w:~ ~w~ ~r V ao~:m~° e aNanem omoo nN N:N h •N N w N ~ LL J01N ^If Nanm ame m<e meaaea 'o a~•fffa~f u m m V i •Li W ~a ~ Niu a Vf y: i~4 w~ i~ Sa Nn WN O• Vw LF NW f2 ni f• Wf ao u m• `1i w Ww O rf it rVi faisi uYn fWJW °w n:~.W.e.°IS~ siN fPa1Ff9WjJ NmwNii ifs Y n V O V i s s IL tlpW p6 tl• N•N ~U S iTV NL• u10NiWNWO nV M„inn~1 ~V~VJO pNMM WFIV YYi1f NVW N~nmJOfVi •MO{O m MOMS •W 1Ji WF>SwF JI`l IM1 NY1iIN JJJ i iiffWr00 f'l7ili ifi rNnNH1^i1HNw P •mONmNN M N N u O LNP ViN ~')^ WO S O WNw °N6 J Y LL • W•i: •.. \• N• \• •). J• •i• ii. i• w• hi L• `ui NI W• n• 6 p J a «wn000A0000000000wOnr0°°00 00 e eWO i°ca°apN.i oneNr..n NAeOWeoeeh0«Nnreseoeiaw a A r r w w N ra N • N .•N.•ONryAN w r O r A e • w A r\ h N /~ II I• n n n a• •^• ^•^••N JOahOrPONArNAaNeP°rNAaNa P NAaNawWpOrNAanawePO..Nna YTfFOOryNMNxSSSSSS$$aeaaa<S^eSiS7SSSSSS^<^a 66<ai^a a<3S33a W nNaeae+ae+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar+eeaaeeaaa+a•eeeeeoaaa oi•aaaaaaaaaaaaeaaa+aaaaaa•araaaaaa+aaa•aaa•a••••aaa s s rof N+.. n na n n a u NhaeYrN n S • ry A W W wr `i PFhP°\N M W\M_ h_L_ Nw_ hR0 = h + PN L w • aNN\ewa + afw WNJ hOn at J i • a^a0a a a9 • P WW WWah L 1 h i \ w i VNyhyJV V..V iVtV E R _~ = i u F ° O N • i • C U ° 1 e ~ i i u C ~ J \ _ e i _ ~ Y 6 :W °w w Y VrVL~V VYVt~V W \V i f i !Y iu ~ NL VJ WO m °°° VL l • WO i J• N ~W i O M t t N e L C U O Y n Y_ h L O W f J W N N Y 9 M ° ~ i W u f i ° R ° W ~ • R it ° ~ f r n Li a W a J~ • • •Y N Y i t w V r r - )L ~ 1°~F WYO : i 700 =l0 f N LN SL :L)JJ IrONNNN WO JOIN ~ W i Y iJ• a oiii `ie .eueY W YNyf pr~yMfOOMWWY _••W~FyN SN• i Y w ~w 1FLiMy N%F0\0O•y.M GINSSJFhiaN F J ~JN yJ WY ihYViOfYJJ JOy• NL Ti W__\!a~•°[0_NYf_tNMM~. f OJaOLWVaiWW N 'J ~eW YfW~NWiW~NOWG 79 )J ~O W O WWM_ ~WWO MOf \r•f •`i•~N O.`iW iWiOYWw NY •°IY )'•` °•JO LOO LWML ~ihLJ .J ipOjiO~VWVMiWNL 1'.e~h °h`i°e)YJ°aLi~°isi ~ihhZNrif oi~r'ei° VLNWNJYiNJVPJhyRWhJiNi a•`IWN~W)WNOWiYwj ORL~~RMiYLiilJVfiiNUNf )YYi)lMiaNwiFi V`=0 a0a lr fJ7N O.Oia•r •WifNOM•W M JFLNWhY wnYW iW`•L•hhLYWYr~OyUN YiYfWNtMw` JNNwtJN9M9 YMINYI: t VW)W)YYM ttJf iNMJfLiLOWW9LW hiLl)iY VwOOW1~GI,.ULOILVYiLLf Vf 100RL0~\OSYOOYL Ni 3J hN i H M~ Y V W r3 Vi • WN NYLL y i aJ YN 6f N S iy V6 Opp N Y)J : w • a W i W ~ R N 3 NL y1 W NN W W O • i NV wi i~00 Y iYJ W N W •NW)wYwN itYi NYaRY•O M NV ~i R iW N ~W~~:~aiaesYaNaasa~LeWass aMJL ~ LL•ss ••eYY a YLS• uffu )rYU~• f LNNY •O JJL RLYOi M[°NtYy • N Y O WJ i•e N„ W Of Y pyyp YMOw aWOR •V •h W~f •VL/• YOOWV/N „ M~O NYt LOJYii )wMWNN °W •if t000 •M JO• aY h e yWWLLLYW``~~11 NYN N YyyNY i~N • YR•iy2 aiJiYwMVYON~~w a~f•Y•~N YNR\M Y•Y ~JJLiYa•• h)JJrf OCCCCCCf'J°l••aiJJOLOi-WyiO •f•a••0000010000000YYYYYYYYVYYVROO~R n w • N • R OOIh wSNRaM~~~YN1~ARryy~w~~1~PI~R.A. ~wewN wRl-.1'Ia A • ~ a N An NPOPaOn rAA•^ ONryAO w• AOOOOwN A R N An A NAAr NNMn PNn•INA RR RNRNAAA W 7 - - eave+vrNnvNVVaaeNr+rvnNVpNnNeaPVemeemrNew enM°e eFOV rewoNVNOnvwveNaePawoNePevaePONnPr+NVeraen :ii •<• e~or-a««o~eemw«iww.:«iine««ee«r;i r nl: l=.n<eeee~w•w; ~• Nrw°P n.r.o aeeNnPamaNnnN+rvrONNNanaNrnranene+ee Nm + N m nN NmNNNwrrNrP••rNNa NN.4 \• n N N N J n •. •<• N + ra m oYfY N ~• ~=Y JNahOPO•.Nn+Ner OPOrNn+Nahf PONNn+NarePOrNn+NarePOwNi.1+N PPPa NNNNNNnmmnlnT ~`°+°ee°e °a oa<oaoaao R°€Y.wQr°..°wh ~r=l:sC1^-~n."•.r.~n~w.N.nhhhrnrrhrrrr aaoaooaaaeaoeaeaaaaaa•a•aaaee•aoaoaaaaaoaoaaaaaaaaaa •!• vaa+a+a+aaaaaa+++++•a++++a+++r++a++++aaaa++aaaa+a+a+ fZl y{N pJL U LL Y •Q• is. •WY •h 11 Y 7 Y • C Vm f • • L 2 n S _We p • i M S rv Vw O :eY N N• P r Z n • N Z e O\On y NN • NP Jlw= nrwi IIY r YN_Y__\ VY_Y_N JI Y_ n_ >WrW N OiN r O\ Pn'J W W w ) > W tN U ) LL< •V.rJ Uf LO VVy ZM > f YY fYnii ZLJ)r <N WJ f LLO\J < 2 « Y YNr<Z NW LS >W. SO Jri )• f)f fZ fNf2~ •<f Of 2f<• fJLO u a iV Y V L LD LNL ~16:r/L Lt N!V NiN:r N UOI Yr~fi » Z •• Zf N> Z J NN= JY Z eJ )WOOY nlOfZi JiIVWJf+uYU OM V SYJ Z O..N V ZVVO OZpOmO •> OOf: O O li ZJYe • •WY \ •IINY YN>Wnr YYY .YYI !hl YZ ~[~ < OVfNON N~SLn` ZN ffifUW~.r w. .. r.. r.. ....•..r rte.. . .•~ WVLffJ90RV9J9ZfWO70YLM9W<9W »~Nr NF V^O OiNOYW Y6` Y!lNlW~lpl.[ZYOOfN VlbIZY OnLL m.y mVJ N fVM: .YOVYN> YOr6 f YYYZWrfOV < w WN VLWLiW OLOWOOONN=Mr. Nf Nfy LNNfONNp[ONI ~m JpNJNFLZOVO)>.Jf YOJY yY i6i i Sll •OyY F ZWZZ 'Ot O LYY.Z.WJi •Y)rMWSML~Lrif 9LLM^MUjrhrWO~Y N7NNOWNV hLLNL LZVSVmJJ ZIZWON)laOiWZlOOL J<OLILUrN2LLL<lJLLVOWi W OWWN„NONWWW! FNZW WYiZJI ZMJ JiY WJJJYOJ ZJf WJS Niel 9 iNi W IVZh>NOOf_ f_ r_f i<_ffWi<_{_U=s e_GJ Y NV< WOp~LL~<rfbf~WO!ll~Y•ti~f ~ 10 D WhNf O ~~~<NWJO\ WLC O~lNL<L fiP:L! OOrZrWiYOYhNNLrYZrLLhVJM W!m! V OONJ ZuWW SVM fYNJY>nWNJfN>MiMJfNNiJrN NSZVZ'J .[ LLWi~~OrN>Z)FJi•Yif Yi•+•JYOOVJJrWMe2P0„`N`VJWYYL mfr<aYNffWWw 00 WamOfOt<VLNrLOYZLLOLmLU wIr1.aLLiSpl4iLVLLO~Ir..V LLIZN 1• N Y f y y y ~ > > O Z i Z m ei u t mp a N N W ,• L M V9f » MW~fNi i VN J J •W •V y r•rOJ3 W U t O Vm W OW ZO ..O VOVW O O lJLii Ni rf<~ yW OilfiN W9iZ W e NNWNfN ZO LN W uuS>fi YNf N~W~//sMs i)yNyY •Of 0> JO'JNJ p eG> {• •`V ~J iYa~Nf9FJVJ~i!<•Yf~NiNOOO~Lr O ~fV •W ••J Yi'J VY S~W!•1 N ONO `: S6LlVLO>iJZ .W WtJW i O NNJWONZIM> >WN •_11• NrWWW VM>O OSOOYJW fSSfWLJYJWf JZW fN>fJ9 !NO U f/>f: nn 1Y J•yry Y~J ~M~~O..IN ~~VLiYJVJL~JObN f Jf• O(MiJW ••• >fi.YN • VWLJOJ WMJ • N1 ••• Fp Ofy` wMFLWV NYNOii N Y O •J•JiIOJ •S 9nIL i/<NWW> ZSZNYWYONOiiiWO ~ ffVUhf ••N J<~ObVW f~fYylWWWif//J NOb•/OWiJiOVff MOWN•~JryIfWZYWWiON (fr/yVfYY f>YYy/Oe OeW W WWWLLLbVVVVVVYV/YS~(SiiiNrNWYJJJJJJ(tiiii(i(((iiti nNlf+ara/NONNnNrrnNOwOnNNhNr/N•/wM•OeNVNM/NrNN) aNN NwNwfryO/llOlaaNhnMNNTNANNNOMNNI+N.ON NNrNNrrMNN/ISMNr NOa^^rNf/NrNrrN/rn•ww/^lafrnNNN/nnrnl~•NNrN/N•fNhV n nNnNn N NN NN NN NN N NMl1rN N N a1111N g `u tN 1• VSN u~^ g;° 2{O eoy OvW 6 JO V LL ui a " :i: OGf• ~• \• h• OI i. X00 •W• I70 . a. OVA •N• •O• •w• i i i I ~ w . • ~ :W: i •SY ~ ~ it 000 ~O~ •WO •O• OayOO1OOOO0NOPOOOOOOOOOOOnOpOONONONwOOrOOM P OO19OO0NwOwOrOOOOOnnONwOOaOwNOOrwOONONF ~N NNr:n yearOaNaPniPNOOpNnOwOOOrnO miinlw-.w. T.Nr ~°. i.R. °9 .N.y^NN°9 wNiN •.y~aea~nhnN9 hNaNhN9rNwn .•w n1 •N O wnw ON nn •• .• w N N n • N N N ^I n JehOPONrvnfNVMOPOwNnrnryyh~1OPONN n~r~OONrMOPOn.INnINr1h~OPOwNnr WaM1FFfhrnnr.:ArFhr hl~l~hl•hAAle•1<•frl•I~I. 1`1`~I•Ih•1. I•rAAI.M1A~%.FFF Or~aii111Vai1iaiiiiViiaalaaaliiilViaeilaVaViliiiii V N N t O ~ W S O O JS P ! 2 V i .• tl 7 a ^N Sry yN O r i V ~ N n P N Z ~ r !Oh W 000 yW~ fW ~W W O W` N V ¢N0 w• Lf Ni i h NT h > o NIN M O =Z =WN NW 0 •0WN ON O y MIiO N O_YP1 N!N_w rOO >h W> Oi W M.. i h V tli r Mnlw„ h j! O OI aO :O V r` o ~N 0 hYj~-ii~JO• •ON F~ OVT OVh V Y NZhrFO NO w6 00* 1j, ~ ~~ ..I, i ~sR a .n;o {;t Wi i e N e 9W hassN~{ tlO\IGVliW t z pZf `W Sfn ii tlrVi NNJttlV !P~ h •u~ {Wh{ {sh i u9 Nu!{{:u{W •{{u<tl~ .iii •~ti{Ni a h 9n ie< Nf NiNlR 9WOO of YNi;OOWW aW Z wiN{Oni W=WOO i<WaWWVWhWrSi9 h1O r sso sio> .. oNhasNs {J h>hi{NU.h.~ > >.• a p iON OF O hM1iNM••iN• •0Z iNNt iO=u~OOi{•i~N WNh M= MWJOf iWyYSSYOi•/Z ~ O =nOPaiW :NG• ••wN• FWWNONN 6i_SO iZ •1 •IO SN i• •M h• rWhV LV aYYShUhfiy W M J!O ai a hWV VeiNVNN WNO S:VjNO•.M OQ•1ZW •W . iSWOW NOWNNaIONN{NhMi:MNOWhOi~: N6tl ^`JJliJiYhtlJON O 6iW0h\\CO\i>JwJ JOJMw Ni OhJNiu _iV>.•w Vq p V e M tl WNMtlNMJ>NJNUN•i•Niih•hiS<W V<ihhWAhOlM>Nkh.ANNY{J<J• aoi{o.N.i ol~~i e-'.e~•iiinuNWii°u i~iiJSU°.N..Nn: i'w r.°1~eai elaii~inew~WR z V N M i SV V •' l • > • a ii W • V Na = V W,W,i r i yyV ~ W NWJVV > SS OM 9NW{N W J i • V~Mf~< uii ft 00 OOZOhi ~ ~ MV>Vi_V V_i {a « Y< > i Oi VM V •• l WfW { OWVh <>YZ V ` WYN9 1 h O O hOMO JanIY>ILJVY i0 W ~: _W VYZ RI W Zi< MNO~Z Y iV ^JI <1~ ``_ ~ZNN <• M<t~ ~ O~ IL O~i iOh rM\iJY ~ ~Y h <V<SJIV<>iNW hNYV wY'NMViW WiS<W V •VN~e~ •l •j Of i'9hWOwOWh• {WYY>iWOiJ wN 00 li N<lNi~<NhhlVQO{J OJS 1y OJ••hVVVN<~J Y•w O I NNWVJ<W~~ O •VV JJW 1 •• M V VwVVWVS O Rl• N>WJ W> iYW •1<NNOV O VSSVV {M0W> p WWpS~WINO<WfWYJO OJ`M(iNNiNO0Jl0 WpW Wy iN if>y~MOlV hhW<WNiNJ~ SY~Y`!V1•>YV WJJ\MWfYhV~1.O >Si{ieWOOO<!•hIS>O>O\NJ Sil2Wi •NMWW V>hV{ONJJV NI•f Ji WJSVVV •WWW S•nO9O<IIIYVWWWSSi{{FM<<OfMN «V 4W 00{{{{{i{\0VROO0VfVVVHNNMHMNMNNNNNNNNMhM»>iii~SM 1•NNhhM<NnNMVTyrNNVNnPVN•OSNPNONrMVOrVTTwOVMeOOPNV Nnn Nl•OIIVONhTO nIP O111N1O•+^.e rnhNan<NNPeRhnN<nahnNO NNNNw~MMN N»~NNNMNNnNN<N 01OMw~rNN1•NnOwnNNVNNaNON x101 n n Al 1.11.1 1111.11y M n w N M n N N O1 N M n A 111111 n 9 4B LNP {i:. u~i ='o ZWO OO OJp ~[~ \• •fn iii •~• •~• O O OONOPO••O ppa000•OOOOPFOwOaMPwnaN/aNOa n• PI•O m O n ~~ON ONO •,.OPOnp ROnN„PI{Na000pnPNa•aP N w •a nP "NaONN PIIa•wN0 N•a nN0 NwONPNnnanNPrp~ry" ry .. n n n n •pep~awen ., maNanePONNmaNanpweJNnlNan/POwNm•NanePO. N~panl--h hff wIN.I nnnmmmnmm RRRRRRPRRRPPP?PPPMTCppwP••PwrPPPPPPPwPPPPXX aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaalaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaa Yo•aaa••aaaaaaa•aaaaa111•1•Iaa•aa••••••••1•••1••a•aa• { ~ i i i . / ! i m/ / ~/W u .N- pa e w n aw.°.~ ~ N si o ~ ~ , n W a O NI- YJ f 2 N • G V a •Wa + n P •PND WY { • O OP T me• r Nij y era »~/pe iunJg z o a N ze n C mNw N t ON h N i i n lv VJ W nn W O Li~00a~Y~~ OZ M• ~ tiw p N 2 Z Ni ` f20nLLp NN W LL W •W av V ••/ J NY uwau Y/ P a O O 6 h m ~ FYw °wooz~~Nw~ zu ! c N zJ P_ e\W r o/w oY «w N.r P.u.W i LL 00 S JN, W_J •` /\O_=SOY _;FLL !j JhOU W \J• 6 wm O a 7LONOS J'JO t z YWZi1t: ~ Vii 7W ~~00 VI OWO O=sOOW Z y2 J h CNW OONNWON h 2 n nn N \y \ZWW Oh N =NZY/ZW\ wV • „W 1[ t LLULL WWOWWi~ :iW66iYw WIJO Y wVyaViWW •W i N [ ~J y OsOCONN00 _ U O :OJmJ OOiP O OUNJ w O 'NZO hM 01LNV W/~wi[ifV N u JW h hhhNWhhi{ ZVNC• 2N »r,O Nbr;hw ~ iN2w_i /_USZNj fNWwyww n PN O=NW W1LUM ~ w W6 wu W <wW ,{h 2/6W N> P uW\ iYw OWm Q NN S :u:02 iCFV hfpNG ~f ~O Fwi_W NZ~~ Mi w NN ! ~ i>Wiwh: ZY i,•M p LL:nW:ON ! VwfmNm N YJWf{ YY F{O/fFf IJVJ{OG ~j WD O !Y LL" UwuNIOGUr'LLLL! W KZV7Nir iMOan OO fW00002 F V'U r9 ivN 2CfYhLLOihMNJ'J N!•.W OfhOWitlmhwLLFWYOJ Jy w wywOwZwWWiii !/OfVihi Y'! ZOO{NNJJJO2W//W V i Cp ;~ WapC OUN•O>~OOVVJ~VWhW(•WiW 6p,Wf~JwYCli~llmVO)~Y [ V w y W• L 06y O l O 'n '1 V O W• N W ViV N O W ' j W ZWO J O !J V aj; » NZ NY[W i w w Z n "" : : r" f L " ~~ . • ~ W`~aL:~~e~ D° ~: e sa: WHWNiifu ivV N W WO WW MO w~ Ii Z N m Nr Ii :WU „ YNm ry O ZZ [NW „NNF, i Vj.• >:i F,: { W WZOOVO NfmM 0 , i N N i ~~ ii rWi _ _ : r V ay i NOJUy iiY 6 r P i i ! i~N - UrWN J p • • W es r W ~~ { 60 F I~iZWiFtV00lOVVrO~YUOUV/w0<~i SYrwi • i N O N Z w y J UOU: N_OrWifZWZW{f{Nf F VOi F " w M N • • ~ : W ~ Yi ~uzio. _ • f{{ y gsf[ Wi iir f Lrwf~•u OWW °u •NiiuJ cDZrl~i/~ ~~/! JLiR -uDO• N Oi ~zz m • • [ Y W• i00uNi iN ZW JO OOOfYVV O {.J000Y • i •W• O 2 i! NM wJrNWV ` pp s ` yyII OOWtY1i.•iiO FwFn W WW ~' ~Mi~S~JZhF Y t>H •[• w V iY WIWO{ J , i r J N MPNOFFJrNO JJZOFVJ000YVUJYJJ2 I Z~ Ilf• •i• [ W OW 00 ~{ Z O VNii/ {m{/{/ : h VNM UV fi/WWMOO! itlfw0000i9000 WWWWNyOVJ {{OOOOOOOV VVVVVVVYVVVVVYVOOOOOOOWWY 1- O h0 PP 1-„IOONO{NnON„NP POaNawNON „INNI-OPONNI-NI-TOO N N I-N ~H mOw100nwwDOINOMwNOMNOR~ •OOOhNyP101gNN0,1 I•1 • Oy yNa„Nma nOO~mNNNImONwONn ~N Ny00NN0,1 Nwn nnNN NnmN NN NNNN N n /~ V• n000000NmNO00000nea000NO00NO0e00000 OIn Taa00NNOOPTNw n1a0000«1000oNOnmONe OaONa01-a OOaMOxaPmTPOO m.o~~PPOPNammmOxOnNNwa w w p r i N NpaPeaa00NNNaNmmTNOOa NpN xa•OhpTT mamT N• Nmw .rNaawa Nww N.r x •wrww N \ ~ n w w x ~+ N •II fei m w N m a x a N wowNTeNanePOwNTaxahmwewn TaN h ePe w Tanahew e a N .lI p p ~ p . p .y1. .pp i p .pp. . . ll 1N~ PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPIPPP w~~~~ ~X~aP PPNPw ww Pw~P PP PPPP P P >aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaeoaaeaamaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa i iii aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ealaaaaaaa • m V m m m Z N S p N e n as.y. i ° rvz oo J \N uuJ i •P ~ •\ h r rF\\PZ J ~ 1[NO N _ mu N v Ne ° W ~ • WY W l= n:ww\m h W i ,f e x W WNNN Jhi OI ; i V \N`\\\>?V pN Z= tNNO 7r• T N i M1h ZNP m h<ON iFm Nf YZ%r ZU fl !E \S ~> rN~J <Oa JP P VE g~iC:W• e ~fe i oN> Nh ~ O •ia~lh• h> euN ns««i «o N n\ o\ yil I JZ 000 Ih > O\P :hiOZ Pf h P P \ ~ m OHO • • • • PP\ZS OWm • VNf _ VIWJ nMWW V W m N_ wV_ _ Y LIV VWOiW•f0\N\NPW« NN N W ~~~rr ~~ r_IJNrP_ P« S_9Wi\ m\ V rr ~ n JI rN ~W finwW C ~NhM1h« U NtiiO L L m i iLL0 `00 ~ nNMZ \O FWWifNI a \ 2 Fw„JLL x¢i0 W fW J JWfmWhO CON »WYNn NVhhw 1 S rZ ~O O fLL~ \ iU\ N C I.m iNw O ~i Om«Z = O JSOO> `Wr m \W T OC ` j W9w W Z SNZ Ny N NVVOJZ •tOw6W Z\WT~~WOhU> \NC •S UC _ Y FMGME«TONiW VJ:If rIW \ ZV nN2 r> iy nlW •WmZ ONO J NSNSWLxif LLOO T~NC>OZO p>w>•~LLWN OYVaO O wm OfNZ N.phN Jii>C \0 Orr its wmONVLLfM ~wO: u Sr JE i FZ N NPlhhm'J OiI aV` 0Z OJ N O OON J>O S rO U O V O LL T :Omf ~V>w VpWVWTVYZipf 6rl O SYf_O W«hhCa U~W Y~ ffVW James<Y 9e •yMIJ rw VfWi N r' W Pn a Vf n y •ZI unt uy z oPeNm uV J nl 1 \ oNml-.+ hwNnaNN>n«r whNr>Fr•>\ Uh >FYM Or. ZZ> ~ •W SiZWJIL6JiZYa220lJJafZ wOJ ZZ>ffNSNVNPyO•NOZ OyOZ 1C C S6 OCG Y T f Ot nCC JYY ;~U YC 0 N L OZ N1•>ZNZO V r Ir LL ~rVVLLG AY0 2 C NV l O _ « Z V h • • ri O h WN fN pJ CL J 2 V 9 IL W N f V r Y 'J I if Z O V>h fH = J <J M i y ~ OWiY YY O >. it J J y xSr ar22 00 4 Z ~ ~ ~ itm w W W N Y J \F W W I Y • C6 V• ~ J «ZS~ J1 O 2 •a W UWSJ ZOO WV f • _ NOC i1LJ9 w aW V= ZCNO V OV ZNfY Z BMW i MN _ f Cw m NiMF Mi L _ Ni V wW•tYJ JO a V> iYi VOa W_fWJtlfyhi ImN• Z 00 iiy O yy O` JW~ EYWOOEf VVNxIW[f NmFf 00'J JOOW iiV •ViF~¢J 6'Ji irti• NtONiNWOF O>J'JWWL 1'O OWW>1f iN• ifJONOmii> OWNiV L• • • iimi f iV IL> 'IOOn Of «WJJi Za yW • N YM\OWWM i m O Z O 11 11 > WW YOCS •{ IJ Ci pMZ• •Z .1 YMV V«a •JJ •~•2i rZi• rrM1 •hJ JmOrtii N iN•CSe O • •iiN Zi •iF•WWN «iWi WFJ• WJVi YV •h6Nif WW>OM N • • yJWWr >bfWWU YWSSIy• ZM ZYYr[ J y•I NOWZWi mry ~•p fW i„W:iiINFJ ~ ZVVi NE3V EWtWW WfZN>OpJJF1Y WF Wi<J pPP• ~t~ Y OZZhWMY\iiJ•lCmhYJ6•» >tWOm'J>••CWYM>YJJZjii~ •Z• WWW1Li LLILC~CVYYZSSSSr MriiJJiiif[iiSOt\Cit>•iii•NNNNMNMN •i• •O• amaN•war•aORh 110hnNJ•MnhaNOMNNNNwNPIrN•OhTON00000NNP M TNMNaN O TaTNNNN•TNnnPNPN VNONY00TnNO••NNnwaOM••V•O•S• •O• ;W: _ ryNINNN TiwywnNy^1•TNaww~1•Ta10NNTj w NIN•NM NN NNnNN NTNNw N TNN NnNNN A Nnw NMN fN•• r •>I ' ' fNo e 21 yf0 61 Oye O~ `Frt \~ •S~ .Q• •Z• ~w~ 11 • ~ •Z• •~; •O~ Lei ~i~ WI i• oamoP +ooeonNNn ahoeeNeoPeN1oaweaN aiON~f w'aPOmNaariin Tnrmh nr ~.. N N N ~a"~rva r N r r r + JwPP1 pplNanPoPOrNNV.INCCahOPOwN n.INaFiP wPPP~P S~ROSGa0oe0000o00000000 OiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiFl if iiiiiiill VY i N" J w `a si ~ s ! i u a\ ix e.PJ Ln J y VPN• aN I+a „ tla LLi r\M1Z •\ JP y F SLL ~\\r• P>Nr PN W\ hZ \V f tr \e l ONOY U\WVZ \r xF w\w NZf •J whi Zh NI F6 Ilhf \W• F NJFJ JNWhJY6 wV i•JU 9 wZ W\N~VWW _ ZFZi C iV Li •j~ N VnJ6V OL06 ~i W• ZCOOa• NV• QUUnrGN~i2 J~O Oi VW 4G w Ylwa f fUPV>f Of WfFZf _fJ •J OrVWeuw=VN rOfWJSLLrV7WV to WFfZIZZJrPNZf rvxJehZUwJ rfN VNPGZNrinOwPYCrOLLGOV>'~>POVC J h y U 7 J Y O MVY r F Y Oy h NJO p r ~~ ~ V Uf hYO N _H_ Iri Nla r _• „ f ~i D ywfNCN~ u V Nhw OtOFWUiWU ~ rOZW `~ Y der 6 W iVww w wLLUiV VF .`7Wr J7s iJ JNZ •~JOryJhNy j V i i;Y=eVY eJWxyyrIWWJWF„> • W UJOYV UWVyv yrj{Nnh riiJJeJ NNNNOOi hf eeiZfrry~~W wIn lVireww NNNNhrpji» >iiif iifiiRM iii n°inn°ml°n llanr rvnln aN ie n.`iw.rviw~iwae n° ~• iNihTYwNNNNaMimrvMNryNrrN~ T TNw .ITN NNN V ~ ~ G tBeg ~ C tlS°Jmm~' ~ y qa. _ ... a. ...m mm: ~ m tl ° ..~ ~ES: - .E°2 :_ R ° ~ Y• ~~ ~ _ - 4yy'W,'~ k - °°n°9~.9ii ffi:'~ a ~~I f& ___" 8~y r8~~d~S8~ m'~ _ 8y °~ rv die .._~ .._ ~~ ~ _ E:_ '' P t _ _ e ~ C _ ~~}}I ' ~.;f ~ "da y ~ . C Beg ¢ .%$ t s i~ ~ ~i '~ E:, _ 68o-e°&o-.°55£555°aBaRi.s. e_ssgEP$e$°s_5 -e `-°°e ~_°~". `i _r ~e..S .°. °°°F~~'$ F°n'o=° SS:Se.%~~SP i5ii= -e~rv~ r _ e e°~$$$$°~$==ee~ae$aE.°.~e~=° Aoviuvo~~o ___mv . a~~~F~m~~meM1Sn~~~a ~~a _~ ew~~~P~~~~Y. ~. m1C he'K 9°,~$i~$$AR ^iC 9,~FICC ~ ., SFRRIO FfY 8.^S e N SS4.S~R$g$'Y'~,A~'~=~'8~~~$$$$$'$.°.°-.~R~S RJR m ^~ SS8R~~8$~8 m CI ^a 8888&~a -88888888888Ga8RRRR8 e 8883888Re ai xs§ssama~a~ggggx'ggggg~~aa~sgss r asc~gssgg€s SSe&Sas m nF°FSBvSNRRRdgarSY8SSS S«>'s 888$52 - H _ m = RSRRR^~~_eg88R88R8RRepaRB 88€ 8888° 3~- Sa$~$€emSmB~$S~R £iR3R8RKr~o#$~%$ - v~8~Rae~8S a=~ 2~8&%8PGm~„ryRPgZS~RA~°8rrC8°s gii5 SSS3fiea8$~ der 51, 888S88ti7a5_<R8R88R8R888n<8888RR = °°88888888 ~~5 ~ ~- B ~ °oR%a8~^„&~Rr8 & 8ffS~8° 888555 m SSSfiS!%o58 ~ a °m 885888888°>8Z&55£8_8 Ss_.°.8 &885 S$SSsB$B58 i BSI •. s -~~-g8=`-'^.°,SS~_%m°~_=____^„Se9: °_.~->.~°oeo~_~°°ve-veeSSS'ee°e.,°e° ~=X--_CSp% a°,°°°_0_6 '~ ~~~Wg .°,95E3° ~~ ~ii b~ ~$ Nw m~ h ~ _~ ~&ea pia&L`6 n~ ~~m~ '~ ~ ~w~ ~ r ~ wa~' ~ k a x a a e ~ ~ ~.~. z~ a ~ ~~ ~ i a s v i ~ ~~ y y i g ~ yy ^ ^ y ^ ^ ^^i bEIIi~~E~A~EED~1 ~L~~$5~~~~~~~~~Y~: ~ ~3~Ng~~ M$~a~~~~2~~IC 4 g ~ ~ ~ E ~.. pC FSS~~R~S^°°'°^^ Si 6`FAC".A 5 e ~ - e. u ^ ~ ~ ~~~''s~g~s'sss'ss~~~~~~~"s"a"s"s's's~~" ~~= ~ „ ~~~~~~~~~3~ s /~ •~ .s. °_ r ass m„s - ,~ ~Ga s ~~ ¢~ a as°°s2c°e _ _ e__ __ __ _ _ _ ~~a __ i` `x=eassR-'s sas a `a s`a `s a s~ s?~~srs~s m m mm_ m a ?a~a m?- sgg~g^=fig m ~ ~~~ m m gas m ~ o, ° <888R88 S 888 m R$R ^: RBI y~~ %~'~ R8RRR888R o8 SS#~ R 8~1 ~g~ 8' 5g6S6SSS€ S ~ 88~ 8 a SSm~ -_ A' ~° _ ~ ___ ,., _ _ All y r'v' ~W m8`m_>&° sO.B 8 m_ m °m m ~° -~:_msa~r a ree P Y 4~~'~ em$~R ~''_'8 ~e e8e 8 ~Sei e u ", y N° S ~ifA ~ ~~ ~a ~,y~ bY~~sB_~i!'y ~°. 1~,~ -~N''8~"~d'k ~'d~' fu'8 ffi'~6'n b §~ ~,~ S ~5 y~~s €~> .~59 u I! P .g ~~I %'RI $ ' ~"I g' 4: L' ' 3 SI ~w~ ~^ ~~ ,,, C ZI R" °. L 3 3 ,,. ~ L ~~ = ~ v~ s ~ y _`s 's 'v_ ~ ~8 a ~~ x ~ e% 08 8R a8 8° ~ S% m ~ ~~ a " ~e e C 8 ~ ~8 s € Y 3 .9 ~~ ~ a P ~g v ^Si S.°.mSm #S ~S !8 ~8 ~^e ~8 !8 0 .z', 3F .'~rv gip Y. Y..: 1f fY. f@. % ~P : ~_~~~ RCap3S _ 8 % m8m88 8 R del -~~a~~ z^ i s ~_` r F"a ss~se~aasess~ x a $~s ~`~~, ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~e~eoee~vevevee e e e e Y~ a' a " .. ..~,.~.._.~.~....mmmm m ., ~ .. ~i. oK ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y E ~ ~ ~S.aa.~. ~ ~~~~~~11K ~'%l~w~F~ ~ ?~ ~ w r ., a s a a t kx a a a t '~"~~~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ^~~ i y py ~{{ ^~ y{ ^^ y p ~y ~ i y ~~38~4E~iYIIES~~~IR ~ ~% Sx ~ 3 ~ ~ M ~ . ~, ~ p 6 k yt e +y S S ~ 5 q ~ 8e88888€88888880 ~ ~ 8 ~ 9~ I $ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y y8 ' ~ E~ ~:Y ~~g ~ , _- L2. a~ ~' Y' ~ _ ~ ~° ~ _&~£ x$ ~~' e ~~I a~ ~ e.. %: a`: -rS~ »s ~~~~ tlN <~Y ~le~~ ox. `y ~~~tl 5 ~ ~ G ~~~~~ ~ Q ~ Fn i W E 9 W i ~~. e~ =' ~~~ R IC s T tl{ 6 I V w n,mv nn n ~ wrn iin n,rn • w"n~rn STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 T0: C1ty Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Engineer g~3 . SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting B1ds" for the 19th Street Improvment Pro,~ect between Archibald and Maven Avenues, to be funded from Systems and 58140 Funds, Account No, cc-4u37-8744 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that C1ty Council approve plans and specifications for the 19th Street Improvement PraSect and approve Lhe attached rcsolutlon authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice inviting Btds". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by B.S.I., reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engl~~er. The Engineer's estimate for construction 1s 5350,000.00. Legal advertising ,~ •F.c~^. cd sue. ~~..~... ~~ InnrJ .~ e.....~~_.. . Innn :71 t` t`.'. ~'.C y. .r.......... opening September 13, 1990, at 2:00 p.m. r Respectfully submitted, SB:LBay Attachment ~q f~~. RESOLUTION N0~ 90 "3a`~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "19TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BETNEEN ARCHIBALD AND HAYEN AVENUES", IN SAiU CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO AOYERT[SE TO RECEIVE BIDS '„1EREAS, it Ss the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain lmprovemertts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the CT ty of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications pl ansnand specifications forchl9thcStreet ImprovementhP roJectpbetweenas the Archibald and Haven Avenues". BE IT FURTHER RESOLYED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required Dy law for the receipt o' sealed bids ar proposals for doing the work specified 1n the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED 9ID5 OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice. NDTTf.F Tc wcuray rrpcy t.".at ;;~ ;;;~ C;Ly yr Rancno Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 13th day of September 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "19th Street Improvement Protect between Archibald and Haven Avenues" 1n said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately to the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, Bids must be made on a form provided for Lhe purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of 19th Street Improvement Protect between Archibald and Haven Avenues". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter i, Articles 1 and ?, the Contractor fs required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per dl em wages for work of a similar character 1n the locality to which the public work 1s performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages For holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file 1n the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any d~ interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.001 for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herelnbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under h1 m, in violation of the nrovtsions of said L°b^r retie. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly Indentured apprentices may be employed in Lhe prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions 1n Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 or the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen fn any apprenticeable occupation to appiy to Lhe ,joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program 1n that trade fora certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of Coverage by the Joint apprenticeship rrxmii ttaa hec arrnodsd s rc Lhe requ =" °. pcrc.r.. „l tie iv ~d~a y,'i ur' N/ est for certificate nor 8. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of Its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the ad<ntntstratlon of apprentireship programs ff he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen 1n any apprentlceabie trade on such contracts and 1f other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenttceshlp standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or ~I from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall tonstltute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth 1n Division 2, Fart 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for eacn laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (S) hours in violation of said Labor Code. wncrac cor agrees to pay travel and suDSi stance pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined 1n the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1173.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable Lo the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and 1n event of fat)ure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. if the fi tv of Ranrhn ho-aonnna au"nAe •M ^t" ^t t: t~. _ _ bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied~byVthe~ City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract far said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond 1n an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the contract price for said work shall De given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance rnvering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done 1n accordance with the profiles, plans, and ~~ specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Lfne Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and speclftcatlons, available at the office of Lhe City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 535.00, said 535.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, tegether with an additional nonreimbursable payment of E20.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, ag coY fnrih {n tho Plane anA 5peri i1 ~a11 n..q r-gerdi r.~ ~!:= 3vik contracted to De done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities 1n lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla. Dated this day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla, this _ day of 19 ADYERTISE ON: August 2~, 1990 and September 4, 1990 ~: ~ 3 ~.. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: August 15, 1990 TO: Rayor and Rembere of the City council FAOR: Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II SUWaCT: IaBSAIJJRMS Ipf6 - M687EIU MASSE ZRDOSTAIES ~ Recommendation ~~ ... ~--._-_._ ? inat the City Council accept the attached installment note in the amountr of $33,224.26 from Western Waste Induatr Sae. Analvale Weetern Waste Industries did not make its franchise payment for the quarterly period July 1, 1989 through September 30, 1989. This payment wne not made due to the fact that western Neste Induetriee experienced relocation and personnel changes. Dpon discovery of thin delinquency, Nestern Neste lms:ediately paid the quarterly payment of $18,985.29. Pursuant to the franchise agreement all payments shall Da mode io the City within 30 days of the conclusion of each calendar quarter. Dpon the expiration of any i0 dwv +wnl mi n Aallnmmn! • ~n~n~wn! n~ os• m .v.nlb eF.lt w.. 1....1 ..A ._..._!.~_! the unpaid balance. 2haretore, penslties will apply to this late payment. The penalty calculations for Neetern Neste Industries ere ae follows: Franchise Pee Owed ~ $18,985.29 $18,985.29 x 25t $4,746.32 $4,746.32 x 7 months >• $33,224.26 - penalty Weetern Waaie has acknowledged ire error and reeponaibility for payment of the penalty. It ie recommended that this penalty be paid over n 12 month period with an llltereat rate of 9t to be paid on the unpaid principle. Respectfully submitted, ~, D en~eel' ~ ~J Rnnagement Analyst II DO/tlr D0:381 cc: Jack Lam, AICp, Clty Reneger Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Ranagar INSTALLMENT NOTE-INTEREST INCLUDED = 33,224.26 Chino Ci~hOmW June 27, 3890 In NIItalNnentt a8 heroin stated, for vdue retd9ed, iM underspned maker(s) promlu(s) to pap b City of Eaacho Cucamonga soda ~ P.0. Box 807, Rmcho Cucamonga, California 91729 lM SUm d Thirty-three Thousand Two Eundsed 'rirenty-four and 26/100******************BOtyp~ June 1, 1990 rdM Iderost from on the unpaid pNntdpal at the rats d Nine Percent (9x) pa CMlpa annum: ptlndpal arM interest psymtemnetaarnmed Eight Thousand Nine Nundred Ninety-one and 31/100 (6991.32/Qtr)******************** Odgfs amaaonOle 30th ~, after each quarter idd~h,bsplnnlnp pl tM 30th ~ d July, 1990, then October 30, 1990, January 30, 1991, :y+f.l 3C, and camnulnp umN sold pflndpW and Nlaeat Itwe heM Tulry paid. 25 Western Waete Industries by Al Slmonlan. 41ce President ..._.....__.~ ._. nr'riw.irrreinld.rrwrinrwiw.x.w.rr.w M..~r6~~rrw r.w -••••~•.-••~ .rw. e.r, ww+r ~rrwo.e• sv.. w.ww.i+~wa~.~ mw w~rr r. DATE: T0: FROM: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 15, 1990 City Council and City Manager Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Environmental Ini*.ia', Study Parts i and ii for the Proposed Railroad Crossing Nidening and Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Crossing (PUC No. 2-96.7) an Naven Avenue and the Sssuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor RECDI/EIDATIOM: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the Proposed Nidening and Improvements to said crossing and the Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the se ei„n +snrnyawante fn tM atrhicnn, Tnneka and Santa Fe ;r:;0___ _ .. Crossing (PUC No. 2-96.7) on Haven Avenue. In confonmance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of said widening and improvements. The protect generally entails Lhe widening of railroad crossing, installation of rubberized railway crossing pads and modern automatic warning devices for public safety and convenience, it 1s the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed pro,)ect wiil not create a significant adverse impact on the Environrent and therefore recommend that these Improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submitted, SB:JAD:IY Attachments .~ ~P RESOLUTION N0. qo -.33~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PARTS 1 AND II AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED NipENING AHD IMPROYEMENTS TO THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CRtlSSIN6 (DUC N0. 2-96.7) ON HAYEN AVENUE NORTH OF BTH STREET ~.:. `~`d`.: NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has re~aiewed all available input concerning the Proposed Atchison, Topeka and Santa re icaiiway C~;Deny Crossing ;JTdert„g and improvements; and NHEREAS, said Nldening and Improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and NHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, the C11<y Cou~tl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follors: Section 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga approves the EnvironmenT s~sment Initial Study and Issuance of a CategarTcal Exemption for the Proposed Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ra11MAy Crossing Improvements (PUC No. 2-96.7) on Naven Avenue north of 8th Street. Section 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant W Ehe ~alifornta Environmental Quality Act. d AI'k'LNUIX E NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: _ Secre [ary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Rcam 1311 Sacramento, Calilomia 95314 FROh7: Ci [y of Rancho Cucamonga P.0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~- Clerk of the Board Coup[y of San Bernardino 385 iJ. Ar rowhe~ nv¢., 2nd Floor '- °grna: -- CA 2415 Attn: Engineering Division A.T. c S.F. Railroad Lrossing Wi dening and Improvments on Haven Avenue Proiect Title A.T. E S.F, Railroad Crossin (P.U.L. 2-96,7) on Haven Avenue north of 8th Street rotect ocat:on-o pecittc Railroad Widening and Imp rovements for Public Safety and Convenience, the Ci[y of pose, and Beneliciar Cit of Ran ho canon a Li n i Name o Public Agency Approving Project Litt' of Rancho Cucamonga Name rtl Person or Agency Carrying Out Project Exempt Status: Check One _ Stinis serial (Sec. 1507)) _ Declared Emergency (Sec. 13071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec. IS071 (b) and (c)) ~- Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. A r' I iqr r1 Si--ih t tr~ynt r t•f f m°..r~t a~t•~y ems., Reasons why protect is exempt: M'nor alr cl f e '.r'nn0 Cat tr"~-rr °Q+ lJ'd ..a and 1 nvemenrc, Contact Person Area Code ~ Telephont: Excension Jerry Dyer Associate Enal neer 714-989-1962 x2172 Il ltlcd by applicant: I. Attach certified dpcurnent o[ exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes _ No _ Dale Received for Filing e% / Qom„ Signature `d'o`t'' 3hintu Bone, ilewty Ci1•~,rl~ne>~r Title ENVIRONlvlENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I 1977 GENERAL Far all protects requiring environmental rev!ew, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the protect application is made. Upon receipt of thfs application, the loon ing viv is ion sceri wrli prepare tart II of the In ittal 3tuay ono make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no sigynificant environmental impact and a Negative 0eclaratlon will be flied, (2) The protect will have a signifYcant envirorxnentai impact and an Enviroranental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant gluing further information concerning the proposed protect. Date Filed Protect Title: AT s SF Railroad Crossing North of 8th St. in Haven Street. Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: city Fhgineer, Commr,ity Deveiopmnt De¢artrrent, City of Rancho Cuca~rorga Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Protect: Tarvy A. Dy.r (714) 989-1862 Location of Protect: raven street fran 8th Street to Humbolt Avenue. Assessor's Parcel No.: in street right-of-way. list other permits necessary from local, regional, state srtd federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: PUC and As s sF Railroad. 2q PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed use or proposed protect: Widening on the west side of Haven street (41' to 47' ) betw,rn 8th Street and Hianbolt Avenue. Snstallation of rubber crossing pads for AT s SF Railroad crossing atd installation of curb and gutter, =4dwq~U ~^-? ,rev ^^, sides of street. Acreage of protect area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if dnY: N/A _.. _ __ _ Describe the environmental setttn ~ of the protect site including information an topography, so stab y, p ants (trees), Land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description oP any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): Topography is generally flat exoeat where it rises to ,reet the railroad. No adverse i~ets aze evident as regards to plants, animals, cultural, historic, or sprnie natters. '1-ie existing adjacent laid is in transition to light iirlustrial - mmrrcial uao ii,ui vdl:dllC OL LesiflPlltldl USe. Is the protect part of a larger protect, one of a series of cumulative act tons, which although tndlvidually small, may as a whole have significant environmental Impact rho 30 HILL TNIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground cantours7 ~ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _~ 3. Create a substantial Change in demand for municipal services {police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)1 _ y 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan des ign attons2 _ A 5. Remove any existing trees? Now many2 _ _y__ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lamma6les or explos ives2 Y_ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials rh ie nrw ~.~i wiii ye ne rate adlly: Nnne 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this pro3eCt' None 9. Estimate Lhe amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this proJeet, 1n cubic yards: Less than Soo c.Y. 10. If the pro~eet involves the construction of residential units. canplete the form on the next Dagt. N/A CERTIFIGTION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attaehM exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are Lrue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an a4equate evaluation can be made by the Planning 01v1ston. nn Oate:~~ 6;,/99o Stgnature,~r, ®,.,,~ .~^_ Title Ena neer Associate 3i ;•~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:IONCA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: hHy 4, 1989 APPLICANT: City Engineer, Dept. of Calmlulity Services, City of Rancho q:camonga FILING DATE: LOG Nln(gER: PROJECT: AT b SF Railroad Crossing North of 8th St. in Haven Street. PROJECT LOCATION: AT b SF Railroad Crossing North of 8th St. in Haven Street. I. ENVTRON`~NTAL IMPACTS (Exp lanaelon of all "yea" and "maybe" ansuers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geo loaY. Hill Che proposal have e ignlficant results in: A. llnafaFlw ..Jn ~J1 t~~r~~~r -~~ -~~ r.e~i ~„ geologic relatlonahips7 X b. Ois rupclons, displacements, compaction or burial of the so l17 X c. Change in topography or ground surface ' contour intervals? ~ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ ~ X e. Any potential increase in uind or water eroslon'of soils, affecti~g either on or off sib conditonat X ~ _ f. Changes in'erosLon silts lion, or depositlon7 _ x g. Exposure of people or proper Cy to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landsl idea, mud- aLidss, greund fsllura, or similar hazards? X ,_ _ h. An increase in the rote of extraction and/or X uu of any mineral rssourest .~ .~_ _ 2. klYd ro logy. ULll the proposal have aignlf leanC ruulu ins ~~ YES ;4\YBE ND \ a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? X b. Changes in absorption races, drainage patterns, ar the rate and amount of aurfaee water • runoff? X c. Alterations Co [he course or flow of flood waters? }{ u. Change in iiw emu wll~ ui 8uiflLe LoCv'r .G fiR~ body of water? X e. Discharge into surface eaters, or any alteration of surface water quality? X f. "lteratlo^. ~f gro •rdwz t^r chs rcetcrl ^, [i.~'. u g. Change in the quantity of groundwa tars, either through direct additions or with- drawals, of through Interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? X h. The reduction in the amount of eater other- wise avallab le for pub llc water aupplfes7 _ X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding oc seicheat X 3. wir Quaiicy. Nut cne proposal have afgnit scant res ul cs in: a. Cons cane or periodic air emisa ions from mobile or indirect sources? X Stationary sourcesT X b. Deterioration of amb Lent air quality and/or interference with the attainment of applicable air qua}icy standards? x a - c. ~ Alteration of local or regional clime elc cond itlons, affecting air movement, moisture or tempt securer X 4. Biota Flora. bill the propoeel have stgnif scant results in: a. G'hange in the charaecerlet its of apeciae, including dtvers sty, distribu tlon, of number X of any apatite of plan CST _ __ _ b. Redue tlon of the numbers o[ any unique, rare or endangered spat lee of plantsT _~ X 33 _ YES >4:'(6E :10 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of X plans into an areal - d. Reduction Sn [he potential far agricultural X production2 - Fauna. will [he proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the chara<ce ris tics of species, Sncluding divers lty, distrl6ution, or numbers X of any apaclae of animals? - b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare X or endangered species of animals2 n. introduction of nev ar disruptive species of animals into an area, or result In a barrier X to the mlgra Cion or movement of animals' _ - _ d. Deterioration or removal of axis cing fish or X wildlife hob seat? - - ~- $, Population. N111 the proposal have signif scan[ results in: a. 41F11 Chn proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of X cha human population of an etea2 _. -- - U111 the proposal affect ex Ls Clog housing, or b . s.. .a a, w,.....1 Fmivlnv~ ~aeaic s ._. _______..__ .. _ - uou.e.-.~ X 6. Soc1o-Economic Factors. NF11 the proposal have ' signif Scan[ results ln: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic charactarls tics, including economic or con®ercial dlvets Sty, tax race, and property X valuea2 - -' - b. WL11 project coats be equicab ly dls eribu led among project beneficiari9e, S. e., buyer9, X tax payers or project usera2 - - - 7. Land Use and P1annlnrs Considerations. W111 the proposal have signif scant results int a. A su6e [antlal alteration of the present or X planned land use of an areal •• - -- - b. A eonfllct with any designations, abj eccivas, po lFc les, or adopcsd plans of any governmental X an[itias2 ~ ~ - c. An lopaet upon the qula Sty or quant lty of existing eonsuw,pcivs or non-consumDtlva R rfCCaaCional Opporcueit last ~. -~~ - YES >L1YRF. NO , 8. Transoorta tlon. Hill the proposal have slgnif !cant results in: a. Generation of aubstanclal additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing streets, of demand for new street construction? X c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new yarkin¢? X d. Subatant lal impact upon existing transpor ca- tion ayatew7 X e. Alt eratlons [o present patterns of clrcula- rlnn nT mmvement of oeoole and/or ¢ooda? X f. Alterations to or effects on present and po [entlal water-borne, tail, mass transit or air traffic? ~ X g. Inc ceases 1n Crafflc hazards to mo COt vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ~ 9. Cul tural Rescurces. Hill the proposal have elgniidcant results ln: s. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or his cor !cal raaources? 7i lu. health, Sate[y, and Nuisance Factors. Hill the pro posal have slgnif !cant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? _ i X b. Exposure of people Co po tentlal health hazards? ~ X c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous subs Cancas in the event of an accident? _, ~ X d. M Sncrease in the numbeil~of •tnd ividuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organiema or the exposure of people to such ofganiama? ~ ~~ e. Increase in existing noise levels? ~ ~_ X E. Exposure of people eo po cencia lly dangerous no lsa levale7 X g. The crest ion of obJ ettlonable odoreT ~ ~~ g h. M increase in light or glare? _, __ g 35 ves >U~?ne vn 11. Aesthetics. Hill the proposal have signiF lc ant reaulcs in: a. The obstruction at degrade [Son of any seen lc vista or view? X b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? X c. A cor.f lict with she objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? X 12. Ut 1l Sties and Public Servltes, will the Droposal have a aignificanc need for new systems, or alterations Co the following: a. Electric power? g b. Natural or packaged gas? X c. Communications systems? g d. Hater supply2 X e. rise tewater Eac111ties? X f. Flood control structures? X g. Solid waste facilities? X h. Fire pro [action? X i. Fol ice protection? X j. Schools? X k. Perks or other recceacional facilities? X 1. Rain tensor[ of public facllltles, including roads and Flood control far it ities2 ~ i. X m. Other governmental services? x _1 _ 13. Eneray and Scarce P,esourcea. u111 the proposal have signlE Scan[ results in: a. Use of subscantlal or excessive Euel or energy? 3~ b. Subs tanclal Increase in demand upon existing ~ sources of energy? _ X c. An lo[[[ess !n the demand for development of new soureas of energy. X -.- ~_ _ d. An increase or Derpetuat ion of the conaumpcion of non-ranwa6ls Eo rms of energy, when fees able ranwab is sourus of aenergy era availablai ~ ~ X. 2 :JCU~ YES ;L\t'DE ;to e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or acarca natural resource? X 14. Mande torv FindinRS of SLRnif Scant e. a. Does Cha pra]ect have [he pa ten[ial to degrade Che quality of the envtronmen [, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or vildlife species, eauae a fish or vildlife popu latimn to drop below self eua taining levels, threaten to' ellmina[e a plant or animal Community, reduce the numbnr or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the ma]or periods of i.3i lfO rraia bia,W ry or piehia[ary[ X b. Does the pro]act have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental gonlsi (A short-term Impact on eha environment is one which occurs in a relatively briaP, dafiniclva period of time while long- term impacts will endure wall Into ehs future). X c. Does the pro]ecr have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively cone idarabla? (cumulaeively cone idarable means that the lncremencal effects of an individual pro]ect are considera6la when viewed to connection with the ettects of poet pro]aecs, and probable future pro]eces). % d. Does the pro]ect have environmental effec is which will cause substantial adversa~effacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly? % II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIR0:7!fENTAL EVALUAYIO;i (i.e., of afflrm.tive answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). l.b. Sane fill will be mnpacted to provide for the widsnitg of street and installation of curb and cutter, sidewalk and paverent. 6.b. Public City funds are being used for oongtruction; i.e. the assts will to equitably distributeill amoung tax payers or project users. 37 III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluaiton: ^ I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. rt I find that although the proposed project could have a significant u effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. Q I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT per Rrticle ~, Class t Section t530t of the Caliform a" Environmental Qua t~'ty Ac/t~. Date 9~~, /990 _CL,rw/u'.~ g ture P,.1J(311~E41 Asco~-In'rc Tit e 3$ RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION Not Applicable Tha following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division to order to aid the school distr{ct in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school dtst~tct fcr -cca~odaing the iacea,a:~ auntucr of students prtar to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. SDecific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: _ _ 4. Earliest date of occupancy: ~_ Model/ and+l of Tentative 5. bedrooms Price Range 39 r ---- C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 7, 1990 TO: Maya, Members of the City Council, City Manager PROM: Jim Hart, Adminislra9ve Services Director BV: Joan A. Krosa, PurdfasMg Agent SUBJECT Staff recommends approval of Resolutbn No. 90-~, which will albw the City d Rancho Cucamonga to purchase vadous materials, services, and equipment from ills Slate of Cal'rfomia, Depanment of Generel Servbes. BACKGROUND The Stale of Calilomia offers to all rnunicipalaiea, school districts, and special districts the opportunity to participate in their Cooperative Purchasing Program. ThIs program enables gcti ernmeM eMktes to procure materials, sevices, and equipment through contmde set up DY the Department of General Services. The State of Caldomia provides the various govemmeM agencies wtlh a document of curceM contracts that the Department of General Services has legally procured. This document describes the varbus materials, services, and equipment that may be purchased Nrough the Slate of CalNomia. ANALYSIS The Slate of Calitomia works very we9 wkh bcal agencies end their procurement needs. S1nce the State is such a large entity, beat agencies have been able to take advantage d large quantity discounts, which the City cannot always do on certain items. In add'abn, the State of CalAOmia processes pumfiase orders In a tlmety mader and are very helpful d arty problems arise. Respectfulty suDm9ted, f /`/ (, _ Jim Had AdmlrrelratNe Sevices Director JH/JAK/mem RASOLVTION NO. 90- ~~Y A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIfH1ANIA, AOTBOAIEING THE DEPARTMENT OP GENHRAL SBAVICBS OF THS STATB OF CALIFORNIA TO PORCFIASH CSATAIN HATBA IALS, 90PPLIES, AND BQOIPMHNT ON BHBALF OP TlHS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WI@REAS, the Stste of Cnlifornin requires a reeolutlon nuYhorizing the Department of General Services to purcF.aee items from a eieie conirncY for local agency use; and savings. _ ___ ___ .. ,., ,.,,,,a L~e.ahle NOW, TNERHPOAE, B8 IT RBSOLVHD that the City Connell Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does heteDy authorize the OfPlce of Procurement, Department of General Services of the stets of California to purchase mntsriele, supplies, end egailalant for and on hehslf of the city of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to 8sction 14814, Government Coda, and that the Purchaainq Agent Ss hereby authorized and directed to sign and deliver all necessary raquesb and other document Sn connection iherewlih for and on behalf of the Clty oT Rancho Cucamonga. ~/ RE80LDTIOR RO. 9o-3a~ A REBOLOTIOE OP TBB CITY CODRCIL OP THE CITY OP RAECHO CDCAHONOA ADTHORI3IHO ARD DIRBCTIRO THE EAYOR TO EIECOTB 88TTLBIBHT DOCOIDZETB RBLATIHO TO BMZHBRT DOMAIR CA88 RO. RCV 053129 (QITY 07 RAN4nO G.7Ciss~:avv.~.. van O_ xn1 M. SLLEHA~ BTC.~ ET AL.) AED DIRECTIR6 THB CITY ATTOREHY TO PROC88D IH CONFORMITY THEREI)ITH. A. Reoitnle• (i) The City Council nas directed the City Attorney to initiate and pursue to completion an action in eminent domain seeking acquisition of a portion of the real property commonly known as 12428 and 12472 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California by Resolution No. 90-019 adopted March 21, 1990; (ii) The City Council has bean presented with, and has agreed to, a settlement offer concerning the above-referenced litigation; and (iii) The necessary documents have been prepared and require execution by the Mayor, on behalf oP the City of Rancho Cucamonga, in order to finalize the settlement agreement and Cnu rt. nrnnaadinrt. N01I~ THBREPOR8, SE IT REBOLVLD by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. The Mayor ie authorized and directed to sign, on behalf of the City, the agreement Por purchase of real property in settlement of eminent domain proceeding, and such other documents as may be necessary to finalize the agreement set forth therein. 3. The City Attorney is directed to proceed in conformity with the aettlemsnt agreement. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1990. ~l 1 I, DEERA ADAMS, City clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the day of 1990, by the following votes: AYES: COUNCIL MEMflERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABemprysn: COL^{CZL MEMBSRSe ATTEST• City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Z ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 ~~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner I BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AN OPERATING AGREEMENT BETNEEN SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK ANO THE CITY TO PROVIDE LENDER SERVICES UNDER THE HOME ?MPROVEMEN,T PROGRAM. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recononends that the City Council approve Lhe operating agreement and corresponding disbursement agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. ABSTRACT: In order to provide low-interest loans to qualified lower- income households under the Home Improvement Program, the City must execute an operating agreement with a local, private lending insL itution. The agreement allows the City to reduce the interest rate of the loan, authorizes Lhe necessary depository and disbursement accounts, and establishes a revolving loan fund on behalf of the City. Staff recently requested proposals from local lenders to provide the required services. Three local lenders offered to provide the services needed for the program. The three proposals were evaluated based on overall cost to the Li ty, including the cost to the City of reducing the interest rate of the loans and the cost of loan processing fees. Based on this evaluation, staff determined that the program proposed by Security Pacific National Bank will best meet the needs of the City. BACKGRDUND; The Home Improvement Program involves two types of loans: the Law-Interest Loan and the Oe fe rred Payment Loan. The Low-interest Loan is for households who can make small monthly payments and who otherwise qualify fora loan under standard banking trite rta. The City will reduce the interest rate of the loan to 6 percent per year. Rs an example, an eligible applicant will be able to receive a 510,000 loan for about SBS.DD per rAnth. The Deferred Payment Loan is for households who cannot afford even a small monthly payment, or who otherwise cannot qualify fora standard loan. There will be no interest rate on the Deferred Payment Loan. The homeowner will not be required to make any monthly payments on the loan. The loan need only be repaid when the homeowner sells the home or otherwise transfers the title. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OPERATING RGRE EHENT - HIP LENDER SERVICES August 15, 1990 Page 2 r°°~ #: ~;, All loan repayments will be returned to a revaluing loan fund from which additional loans may be made. ANALYSIS: In order to determine which of the proposed programs best meets the needs of the Home Improvement Program, staff compared the overall casts under earh oroq_ram. These costs are summarized in Attachment I. As can be seen from Attachment I, the overall per-loan cost will be lowest under the programs offered 6y Security Pacific National Bank. Staff also reviewed the additional loan program processing and reporting services offered by Security Pacific National Bank. Staff has determined that the services provided by the bank in w'-=.. Yli th t~`? prQCC ~!;_ ~. - to s~~tlif~he •~^ successful operation of the Home improvement Program. Attachment I: Analysis of Proposed Loan Programs Re t lly to Bra er City P anner 98:L~H/jfs ~S ATTACHMENT I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED LOeVY PROGRAMS AMORTISED LOAN PROGRAMS COST FACTORS SECJRII'Y ~ PACIFIC POMONA FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF AMERICA I. INTEREST RATE TO BORROWER: 6.00% 6,00% 6.50% 2. AMOUNT OF LOAN (EXAMPLE): 510,000 510,000 510,000 3. LOAN TERM (YEARS) 15 IS 15 4. ORIGINATION FEES: SI36 5200 SI30 5. DISBURSEMENT FEES: 530 SII SO 6. COST TO CITY UPON LOAN CLOSING: 17,186 52,671 57,130 7. NET PRESENT VALUE ADIUSTED INCOME 54.622 SO • 53.367 STRF_AM OVER TERM OF LOAN: 8. ADtUSTED COST OF LOAN 70 CTTY: 52,564 52,671 59,769 • No revolving loan fiord income sham generated tmdet dus pmgom. i~ DEFERRED PAYMENT LOAN PROGRAMS COST FACTORS SECURITY PACIFIC POMONA FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF AMERICA 1. LOAN PROCESSING FEES SI59 5450 5350 2. DISBURSEMENT FEES , 550 I i 50 i 50 3. TOTAL COST OF FEES 5209 5450 5350 ~-: ~ w =z;, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIQGA STAFF REPORT GATE: August 15, 1990 TO: Ma vor and Memhe rc of thn r.i rv rnnnr;7 FROM: Brad Buller, City Flanner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner cim srT. nnnnnu ni rn nu non nwn rxrrg7r A PpnFFCCI ONaL CFRV 1f.FS AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF AN INfRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN FOR THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO PLANNING NETWORK IN THE AMOUNT OF E9,075 TO BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT No. 01-4333-6028 (FY 89/90). RECOMMENDATION: It is recamnended that the City Council approve the subject contract by minute action and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. ANALYSIS: On May 2, 1990, the Council adopted an annexation strategy and on June 20, 1990, the Council directed staff to prepare a Specific Plan far the Etiwanda North area in order to provide pre-zoning for the area as required by law as a condition of annexation. The Infrastructure Phasing Plan will be included in the appendix to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The purpose of the Phasing Plan is to tie the completion of necessary infrastructure to the construction of units in the Etiwanda North area. The Phasing Plan will be completed in two phases. Phase I will cost 59,075 and wfll: * Identify all necessary infrastructure, including but not necessarily limited to, water, sewer, drainage, roads, parks, fire fac ilitf es, resource management, and fire (fuel management), as well as service areas. * Identify services. * Provide a matrix identifying the infrastructure and faciitties components which will 6e required to Support development of each of the service areas. * Include printing and other direct costs. * Deliver screen check matrix to City within three weeks of authorization to proceed. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PHASING PLAN AGREEMENT - PLANNING NETWORK Augusi 15, 1990 Page 2 Phase II will cost $10,875 and will: * Identify costs associated with each infrastructure and facilities component and up to six phasing scenarios to determine the most cost efficient order to development, Provide a draft and final Phasing Report. Because not all the cost data is available at this time, this contract fc `_r ?base i only. Staff requested proposals from qualified firms: Michael Brandman Associates Planning Network Because of other commitments, including preparation of the Etiwanda North EIR, Michael Brandman Associates was unable to respond with a proposal. However, based on the criteria of ability to prepare a draft phasing plan matrix in a three week time frame, on the availability of consultant's staff familiar with the City, and with the preparation of phasing plans, staff recommends Planning Network,. Copies of the proposed contract are available in the office of the City Clerk. Res ly fed, 8r Bu r City anner BB :MB/Jfs ~8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Councii FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ANARD AND EXECUTE LETTER AMENDMENT N0. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (84-041) FOR THE f CV3f1V YLHn ENVIRONMENTAL -'IMPACT RE PO RTy, WITH-lIM ICNAEL BRANOMAN ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF 546,019.00 OF WHICH £24,311.00 WILL BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT N0. 70-276-545 AND 521,708.00 N ILL BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT N0. 01-4333-6028 (FY 89/90). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the subject contract amendment by minute action and authorize the Maynr and City Clerk to sign the same. ANAL YSiS: On May 2, 1990, the Council adopted an annexation strategy and on June 20, 1990, the Councii directed staff to prepare a Specific Plan for the Etiwanda North area in order to provide pre-zoning for the area as required by law as a condition of annexation. ~ompietion of the tnvirenmental Impact report is a required component of the annexation applications forwarded to LAFCO and a required component of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Additional services on the Etiwanda North Environmental Impact Report are required in order to revise and complete an EIR for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and also to complete a Resources Management Plan. The Resources Management Plan will describe mitigation measures requf red by the EIR and become an appendix to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Funding for additional services is in the amount of E46,019.00, of which 524,311.00 will be funded from Account No. 70-216-545 and E21 ,708.00 will be funded from Contract Services Account No. 01-4333-6029 (FY 89/90). Cupiei of the proposed contract amendment are avatla ble in the office of the City Clerk. Res f ly sub /Brad er City anner ~ n 88 :MB/,jfs N --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~~' DATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu &se, Deputy City Engineer BY: Ni11ie Yalbuena, Assistant Engineer ~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract No. 13280. located north of Base Line Read between Milliken and Rochester Avenues, submitted by The N1111am Lyon Company ~ RECOMMENDATION It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 13280, accepting the subiect agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALVSIS/BACII6RDIIIN) ' The Design Review for Tract No. 13280, located north of Base L1ne Road between Mi111ken and Rochester Avenues to the Low Medium Density Residential District, was approved by the Planning Comafssion on December 13, 1989. The Developer, The N1111am Lyon Company, is submitting an agreement and eewriiy i.u yuarm~lee Lice was Lru~Liun ui ale nenyun ii0.r nail, uaJ ~, uaaiuy iu the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5240,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5120,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available to the City Clerk's Office. Re~~s~~pec~~tfully submitted, ,6"C.~.~.fn SB:NV:pam Attachmants RESOLUTION No. (O-,3a'o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Alm IMPROVEMENT SECURITY fOR TRACT N0. 13280 uucnc~e •iw lH tv fnuncil of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August 15, 1990 by The N1111am Lyon Company as developer, for the construction of the Kenyon Nay Railroad Crossing adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located north of Base Line Road between Milliken and Rochester Avenues; and NNEREAS, the installation such improvesents, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the tenas thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Design Review for Tract No. 13280; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, whicA is identified in said Iprovement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY t)F RANCHO CUCANAMGII, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the MAyor 1s hereby authorised to sign said Improvement Agreement on Dehalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. s'fi ~?.. §." Snr. +n.. RAIL ROAD C!i'OSS/NG N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVL9ION rrE~t: 17T'I.E: T.?.4CT /~28a EXFIIBI'l~ _ '.'a `~ S~" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BV: Millie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer eY~ . SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON A reques vacate a pu c u an ra nage easement on a portion of lot 5 of Tract 10045, located at the terminus of Almond Street, west of Haven Avenue approximately 20 feet wide and 285.22 feet tong (APN 1074-121-211 RECOMEMDATION: It is recaamw!nded that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sunaaary vacation of a public utility and drainage easement on a portion of Lot 5 of Tract 10045. . BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Ftnai Map for Tract 10045 was approved by the City Council on February 2, 1983, and as part of the conditions of approval for said map, a 20 foot wide public utility and drainage easement was dedicated to the rr e.. •A~.~nM ~,. rho N/11 eTA. rhann•1 nn May 15: 1990. the homeowner of lot 5 of Tract 10045 has filed a request to have the portion of the said easement on her property vacated which is approximately 20 feet wide and 205 feet tong and 1s located at the tenelnus of Almond Street, west of Haven Avenue. The subject easement vacation was not used for the last six years and per Streets and Highways Code, the City can summarily vacate it. On July 11, 1990, the Planning Commission determined that said easement vacation would canfotm to Lhe General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur. pectfully submitted, B~N :J~h ~.~yr Attachment RESOLUTION N0. qp '~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEFENT ON A PORTION OF LOT 5 OF TRACT 10045 NHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highwary Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1s authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the Ctty easement hereinafter more particularly described; and HHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a public utility and drainage easement on a portion of Lot 5 of Tract 10045 is unnecessary for present or prospective public easement purposes because the easement has not been used for the last 6 years. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Lounril of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ma es s order vacating that poMton of street on Map Y-095 on file in Lhe office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which 1s attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and Dy reference made a part thereof. rnv.n„ o~ TG~t e ~ ...~ .tom.. ~Fn A.fn ~M ,aenl of/nn is r~r~nrAM said easementvacation as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" no longer constitutes a public utility easement. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolutlo`o~ recorded fn the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. x r. )„ E%HIRIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION 20' PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION A STRIP OF LAND, 20.00 FEET NIDE, IN LOT 5 OF TRACT NO. 10045, IN yAy --- - _+n C90Y\COTYO STCTC A9 CRLIFORFIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDEDu IN•BOOE 164 OF RAPS, PAGES 77 RND 78 IN THE OFPICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OP SAID COUNTY, THS SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID STRIP EEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5. (( G U D J_' I ~r Q ~ a v ~ Ox v ~~ x. r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Auquat 15, 1990 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, cLP, community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE XENYON PARX PROJECT IN THE V1CTOx1A PLANNED COMMUNZTY ~ RECOM!ffiNDATION That the City Council accept the Renyon Park Project Improvements as complete and authorize the Community Services Director to file a Notice of Completion. BACRGROIIND The Kenyon Park Project, located at 11481 Kenyon Way, in the Victorin Planned Community, has bean completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Department. It is therefore recommended that the City Council accept the project Prom the William Lyon Company ae complete and direct the Community Services Director to file a Notice of Completion for the work. Rea tfully submitted, Jo Schultz C unity Se ices Manager JS/KME/dk 7 RESOLUTION NO. 90- 3/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TfiE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE KENYON PARR PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Kenyon Park Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to ua iiivu, aarciiyiny wa waci~ GLm~,id,`.e. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the work is hereby accepted and the Director of Community Services is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County xecorder of san Hernaralno County. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do herby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongn, California, at a regular meeting of said city council held on the 15th flay of August, 1990. Executed this 16th day of August, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, C ty Clark 5$ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA - __ STAFF REPORT GATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy, L'ity Engineer i o~. Sieve iii. 0ii111antl, PuDlfc Works Inspec to~~ikd~- ---~~ SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13445 located on northwest ~crr~er of Victor?a Park lane anu hw.0@5te+~ A.onue i RECONNENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13445 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept Bald improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of (72,400 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of f724,000. BACICGNOIIID/ANALYSIS Tract 13445 - located on northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue DEVELOPER: The Nilitam Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite R Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 72,400 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) (724,000 Respectfully submtcted, SB:SMG:pam Attachment 59 RESOLUTION N0. QO " 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13445 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of pubNc improvements for Tract 13445 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the ,.,.rk .. mplete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: qugust 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Horks Inspecto SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13810 located on the northslde of Hillside Road at Ram Court. RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13810 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and it is recanaended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount oP 517,445.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (174,449.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13810 - located on the north side of Hillside Road at Ram Court DEVELOPER: Vishnu Patel et al 2025 E. Financial May P.O. Box 775 Glendora, CA 91740 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Streetl f 17,445.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f174,449.00 Respectfully submitted, ~~* SB:SMG:Iy Attachment RESOLUTION N0. C1o -33a- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13810 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements ror iracc i3aiG ~,av~ been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. nue, 1I1LRCf MC, - tj C'LL~ 1 trio °~;~ -f Ranchc ~L'C a!110nga hereby resolves, that theuwork~ 1s hereby accepted and the City Engineer is auihorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 1 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 15, 1990 City Coundl and City Manager Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Stev> M, Gilliland, Pub19c Norks Inspector i Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 11030 undergrounding Located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Foothill 9oulevard and Deer Creek Channel. RECOMlENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 11030 undergrounding have been completed in an acceptable manner and 1t 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the'Matntenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of f61,660.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n *.he amount of f616,601.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11030 undergrounein9 - iocai:eu un Gw easy :iCc cf Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel. DEVELOPER: Lewis Development Company 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond f 61,660.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond f 616,601.00 RespectfutQiy'submitted, /may SB:SMG;Iy Attachment Co3 RESOLUTION N0, qQ - ~~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11030 UNDERGROUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE FiIiNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE VIORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements For parcel Map 11030 Ua;Kry';uurlu'ifly, ndre ueen cranpieted to ibe sasisfaciion of ine vity EM1yi~leer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required Lo be filed, certifying the work complete. nuiv, i n¢nEFunE, i'r,e v ~ iy Caan~2. 6f tFK ;. ~ iy 6T naacno Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the York 1s hereby accepted and the C1ty Engineer 1s authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion rlth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 15, 1990 City Council and City Manager Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspect~~~-- i Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bands and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 11341 Traffic Signal located at the Intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue RECOMIENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 11341 Traffic Signal have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and 1t is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Cierk to reiease the Faithful Performance Bond 1n the amount of 5110,000.00. OACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11341 Trefflc Signal - located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and N1111ken Avenue Release: DEVELOPER: LeM15 Homes P.0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Faithful Performance Bond f110,000.00 Respectfully submitted, SB:SMG:Iy Attachment 5 ~, RESOLUTION N0. 9Q -~`/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOl16A, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL M11P 11341 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING Of A NOTICE DF COHPLETION FOR THE NORK Yllrorpe .rte :a~st.-~,-..-- - ~,; mpravenrencs for Parcel Map 11341 Traffic Signal have been caopletedvto the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and HHEREAS, a Notice of Canpletlon Ts required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the C1ty Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 (~ / U T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer B.: Steve M. Gilleland, public darks inspec t@~ ~_ SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tracts 12650 and 12650-4 located on the southvrest corner of Canistel Avenue and Deer f~ _.. n.., _._ RECONEMp11T10M: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bands Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street Improvements remain free from defects in materials and vrorkmanship. DEVELOPER: The Deer Creek Company aeon iit~c_ n_,e.;._ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Tract 12650 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 521,000.00 Respectfully submitted, SB:SMG:Iy ~P 7 Tract 12650-4 f36,000.00 A %:: .6.' ORDINANCE N0. 423 AN ORDI NRN CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RMENDING THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND THE LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR SUBAREA 5 TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT AUTOMOTIVE FLEET STORAGE A. Recitais. (i) On .lone 27, 1990, the Planning Conmissi on of the City of Ranc he Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed p!!hlir ha ar+c; -;+«~ _ .~ .~c -.c ..,,. referenced Industrial Specific Plan Amendment. Foll owing ~ihe conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Coim!ission adopted its Resolution No. 90-79 thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Industrial Specific Pian Amendment No. 90-02. (ii) On August 1, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certif{es that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environ- mental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: The Industrial Area Specific Plan, Part III, Table III-1 on Page III-5, is hereby amended to add Automotive fleet Storage as a condi- tionally permitted use in Subarea 5, as shown in the attached Exhibit "R." SECTION 4: The indusiriai Area Specific Pian, Part iY, Subarea 5 Development Reg~tions, commencing on page IV-37, is hereby amended to add Automotive Fleet Storage as a conditionally permitted use, as shown in the attached Exhibit "B." ~P V Ordinance No. 423 Page 2 Signature Page ~~ l .c ~~. C`Xk I~c7- t•d hl SUMM TABLE III- 7 Ordinance No. 423 • PEgMITTEO 115E ARY pF LAND USE TYP Page 3 + cogoinoN«LV pEgrairTED usE BY SUBAREA. USE TYPES Lan° ~_s Ip NOTE Non-mar4ee Uses Nal pv,.,~,~„_ NUFACT Suear•ai ryp_GI_GI DI cl GI IP 1P f., n. ,. _ URIMY: lrynl M•tllum Hyvy PrebaUOnal. vnm• - M••.._. - O•Nyn S•rnq• • i +_ + • a ~~~_ Anlm•1 Gr•......•ry Suppll•• i 9•rvlcb _ T ~ ~ ~ 1 AN •nt•LLbUng .+I + + ~ • -1 A•t•BNltlr• iugM Trueh q•PNr'Mglw I • I CI + I )+ I 14 i + + ~ +: + ' A~ • " TrueM gIP1rI-Mao • I + (~ + ' + { • + I I I Automotly a•I•• 1 r • ; + I • I +I I • I ~ • ~ + + Buu°I 5orrc•Statron I ~ I I I I+I++I •I • ++1__I ~ ~ BmltlrM Centr•etw i Ollic• { Y•rtl• + ' i yComr•cter•Stor•yY•re I•I iI•I+I +~+I+ ~+~+I+I +: BunWUM MNnt•nNrc• a•rvicq +, •I • ~ I • ~ + ~ + Bu• y A t'anrlnp E.WPmIM ~ I • I • • ~ ~ ~ • I ~ I I •Nb a•PPIY MINI { a«rl .•li•a A SN••~ • + (• I I 1 • I • I • I i Convmmc•S•i °ac•• :I •'+i•i •I+~~i:l •, I i•i•• •i• Gil 6 Suvrcy i • I +I I • + '••I Ent•~ • alrnhlny E•dNbNnMb +' + I + ~ + I I e I • I ~ e Fes•FO0° Impel Comm«el•1 + I I • • + ~ I I ••I • • • I • I • • : + + ~+ fln•nel Sa4• I I I I I ++ + +I I•I{I} i •I, In•unnc• { qql E•Ut• a•rrlcu i+ I I I + Fooa A Bnuayr S•lea +i 'F I + + } 1 ~ i ~ j ~ } ; I FPn..N a Cr•m•IVr s«Ne•• I •' ~I I + . I i 1' + ' + + + NgvY EPYIPmInl Sabi q•ntUa ~+ i'+~+~++ 4lfl~l++i'}I •I+i+++'+ Nebl/MO1N I ~ W I I+ M~a<~V SNrrc•a }I+ +II ~'+ 4i I I+~+I+14 + I ..+ P«vonN N•Nt• Cut S•rr'I<• i~ l '• I I I• I• I I I + Sari<a • I~ • I • I P•tr • +I I*Ifl I+I i~+l I I•~~•i onN F•cMM• +' + ;' qM•M t•rrkq '+I+i4 +I+ItI+I .I+,+I{vl ~+ + Stq~l'An ~ i • i + ~ i CIVIC --~ I ~•j+j•~•I I •I• +~+ •~•~a~~'~I~r I I•I•I •I•I• i AtlmNyItaDr• Clrlc «vICU Cullur•I I • , • ' + aNnNr• •ro•et U • • • • - . Illlt FI•o N • tl Contr VIIetY Corr Qocllltl•• ~ l; I ~ } I +I + • i • • I • •, : I PP•Ilt Mwln•q ~ • ~ + + } Puelr< a•NIY i Ullnl • A..•mel ~+~ ~ ~~~+I I+I+I+I i+l4;~l~l+I I+~+' NO-N•r•n Av. Or•r4 cl 0i•G•n•rN In + + ~ ~ + ~ + + + + Y Drtln tlualrral MI NI-Mmrmu +I + + NI•NOavY m°uapn~~ It•avY Intlu•bmr ~+'+IfI•I•i •I • • • • ~ • I i• ~J +j •j•i•I •i • •' i_ ~~i-~ Ordinance No. 423 ~~/~' ~~la,,,_ii Page 4 SJ OAREA 5 Land Jse 7esignation General (ndw tri al primary Fanc ti on Tne area has railroad access and is substantially Jeval oiled with Ana ny users having rail access. 'dnere pos si ole, future users should De funs tional ly ;arved by rail uses and primarily for manufac Wring and warenou5~ng ac ti vi tl e5. This idb3 "B3 `. located south of AT 8 SF Railroad to the soutne rn City limit east of Archibald, west of Haven. Rail iervice Function It is the City's policy to encourage the development of Rail Service facilities on parcels wi ter strong rail development potential. Standards have been es to dl is ned as a part of this SDecific Plan (Part IIt, Section IY.G.) which require Rail Service development of all parcels which a,i,j oin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. Permitted Js es Custom Manufacturing Light Mandfacturing Medium Manufacturing Research Services Light Mholesale, Storage, and Distribution Medium Nholesale, Storage and Distribution Agricultural/Nursery Supplies and Services i.a cing ana Un nK1ng tstd Dltshmints Repair Services Conditional Uses Puolic Storage Heavy Nholesaie, Storage, and Distribution Automabile/Lfght Truck Repair - Minor Automobile/Truck Repair - Ma,Ior Building Contractor's Jffices and Yards Building and Light Equipment Supplies and Sales Business Support Services Convenience Sales and Services Food and Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and RenUls Petroleum Products Storage Recreation Facilities Extensive Impact Utility Factllties Puolic Safety and Utility Servlces p_4c MntivE ~leeT ~jfpraq P. I V- 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Ausust 15, 1990 T0: City Councii and City Manager FROM: Shintu Dose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer ,~ ~f SUBJECT: Approval of amending maps for Tract Nos. 13565, 13565-6 and 13565-9, located on the north side of 24th Street and east of Hardman-Bullock Road submitted by Standard Pacific of Orange County RELOMEMDATIOM: It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving amending Tract Map Nos. 13565, 13565-6, and 13565-9 and authorising the City Clerk to cause said maps to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract Map Nos. 13565, -6 and -9 located on the north side of 24th Street and east of Hardman-Bullock Road was approved by the County of San Bernardino. Annexation and Development Agreements were approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 16, 1988 and December 7, 1988 respectively, for the 4PG1. li• On September 27, 1989 and November 8, 1989, the Planning Connission aDProved the recommendation by the Design Review Committee for the above mentioned tracts. As a result of the Planning Commission's approval, it is necessary to amend several lot lines on these affected tracts due to side yard setbacks. Standard Pacific of Orange County Is submitting these amended maps to provide for the necessary ad~ustaents to the lot lines. Standard Pacific of Orange County has an approved agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements on file in the City Clerk's office. Re~~sp//ectf~~ully nnsubmitted, /3'~/ SB:JS:~h Attachment 7 ~- RESOLUTION N0. (~p- ?~~,~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING TRACT MAP NOS. 13565, 13565-6, and 13565-9 NHEREAS, the Amending Tract Maps 13565, 13565-6 and 13565-9 submitted by Standard Pacific of Orange County, Subdivider, located on the north side of 24th Street and east of Hardman Bullock Road, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sy said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and to compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and NHEREAS, the original Tract Nap Nos. 13565, 13565-6 and 13565-9 were originally approved by the County of San Bernardino and the Design reviews for the said maps have been approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and NHEREAS, the developer has made a significant number of changes of lot lines to accommodate specific residential development units; and NNEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Amending Parcel Maps said Subdivider submits for approval said Amending Maps offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. I,1 ~VV A.. ~;` I.; ~.. I. it aLM1 I.i .. vin, ~~, u~ ~ y Y) Rancho Cucamonga,~Caltfornia,~that the offers for dedication and the Amending Maps delineating same are hereby approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City and record said maps. 73 2 pER BI ]I /69 1.~ q Ir b ~5~~~° ~ °\~b1e ~9 \\4. v 2 4r 3 ~ ~ f1-~ Ir \~ s r O ~'L° w0r ~ t/! IIr \a ~ ry ,~/~'L9 ~1 ~ ~ 'I'mo' ~I ~ \1 ~ ~ry6 r~ I \9 'C I~,y 4 ~•_a ~ ° y P A ~ ~ ' ~ ~~I 5l .~„I 09 1111 s\~ +°n „Dry e\~ VIII °/ .,9~9Yr. ~° , I,ry foa2~\ryy'Y~~\O or °,~ ry\y ~ ~\9~v~ ~\~A~~ d ~ ~\a}2 .(\9 n \1 / 6syb. Ot ~~~h 1I. ~b\. t~\ ~~\ y. Z. I '~Y 1~0\e\\ yy ~ ~ °\\ ~ X91 3 \ol a 1e19~ ~ ,B\ry~. ~2 t p'+\p\\a\ 9~ op° 1\ b '~ \ ~ A h 'I 'y _ \~ t \0\9\ 11~P / \6\, end 'B ~+ d> it M1~\\ c+s 2\~ ~ \°~\f~ °~~ N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DM3ION 9c~ oT X \. :l 'x'-10=I u~\D~\ !\ry j7T t t~ 5 ~'~i `o v \ ~? I s 4` ya ~~2 l9 '15~~ \ p0 fib' •~ k ~ •`"\ry ~ \h\ ` 6 \ i dry \\~+\yT' ^l" \ T^R t" , rM1~~. G} ^. E I \ r].i. ~~IZ+~•=Y 9FaP ~(1 w ~ see a] ~ ~r SEE DETAIL ~Y~ LOT ~'2" F0. 2~ LP ~00.~ L 9.92!8 . R 9.31/58-60 F,E` 6~ ~ Q,\rr,'l o0i LGT ~X TjjR~~~4LLC``T /~VW'/ m f ..A.: =6 wti~" ~,~ ~ ~o~`"~ o v e P ~ '1 1 \ ,p '~ k h \~\ '~\ ~~ \~'~ '\ b ~2+s~= 0 ~ \a \ .~7. 1' .50 ~ 1'S"II' \y ~ ~~Y 9 ~ °~ ~" 'p ry ry t 9 ~ '~ ^P+}~ ~L '~~ C~ 9 ~ ~ \~ .m -. •..ru. ..- uva 9x W -„ r P~ RI VIMI mJ oq¢ ~ ow z ~v «g 4Q J'_ x 30 00 13265 G 2 1 P WIfN BRA39 TAG ~ F0.1°I.P YIITN P TAMIEL AS SHOWN PER R iiSRS •9 PLLUG SL.AIPEO _ PEfl Tfl. 836 5- ~p`' ` r V PPEM: ~m~n~~o /N~ TITLE: 7R/~ ~~6 -9 ~~ ; EXHIBPi` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Nalt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer e~3 . SUBJECT: Vacation of a portion of Ktnlock Avenue located south of Highland Avenue and east of Hermosa Avenue RECOlIENDATION: It Ts recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the vacation of a portion of Ktnlock Avenue, located south of Highland Avenue and east of Hermosa Avenue as described to Exhibit "A" BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Prior to the City's incorporation the County conditioned Tract 9472, which 1s located north of 19th Street and east of Hermosa Avenue, to construct a secondary access to Lhe proposed development. That secondary access was determined to be a "temporary" road from the development to Highland Avenue to the north with the intention of eliminating the road -, - i~~.~.n Ano nl nn"rM rne~ ni fM nrnixf rnn <1v,M iPd fhP 11Prma IIPIIL access to Tract 9472. On October 18, 1989, the City accepted Tract 13342 and with it a public street which meets the requirement of a secondary access to Tract 9472. This action eliminated the requirement to maintain that temporary access to High and Avenue. Since that acceptance of the new access, the City has received a request to vacate that portion of Klnlack Avenue which acts as the temporary access. with the addition of the new access and the impending freewily, this extension of Ktnlock Avenue 1s no longer needed. Upon approval of this vacation, the City will proceed with the destruction of Lhe asphalt surface crossing the freeway corridor which the vacated easement encompassed thereby making that extension of Ktnlock Avenue impassable. In addition, the City will contract to replace the depressed curb at the nerth end of the cut-de-sac whirh elipwed access to this temporary street. The City will also replace the missing sidewalk at the cut-de-sac. There exists a block wall along the north boundary of the tract except at the access to Kiniock Avenue from the north. The applicant was informed that the City would not construct this missing portion of the watt but rather the applicants would be rospanslbie for completing the well at their expense 1f they wished tt constructed. 'S CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT KINLOCK YACATION AUGUST 15, 1990 PAGE 2 In addition, if the property owners desired landscaping at the cul-de-sac they would be responsible for installing those improvements. On dune 13, 1990, the Planning Caawission found that said vacation would conform to the General Plan and recomaended that the vacation occur. Respectfully submitted, SB:MS:jh Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-33~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNAADINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF KINLOCK AVENUE, LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ANO EAST OF HEAMOSA AVENUE WHEREAS, by Resolution Na. 90-309 passed on July 18, 1990, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City street hereinafter snore particulariy described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.m. an August 15, 1990, in the CT•y Hall Council Chamber, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CaliforMa, as the time and place for nearing all persons ob,~ecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and pi ace, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation. NOM, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted that a po ono Tnlock Avenue 15 unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Councii hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No. V-C91 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which hes been further described 1n a legal description which is attached hereto, corked Exhibit "A", e..A A ~ ..e Fn«_,._~ waA~ a nw«f fh~r~Cnf SECTION 2: That the sub,~ect vacation shall be sub~eCt to the reservat onf sand exceptions, if arty, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That the Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the resolution to e~recorded Tn the office of Lhe County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: That the Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolesion, and it shall thereupon take effect and be gn force. 77 EXHIBIT "A" 40 F00T ACCESS EASEMENT A11 that certain real•proDerty situated in the Ci t)' of Rancho Cucamonga, Cou rty of San Bernardi ho, State of Ca7lforia, Deing over a portion of Parcei 2, as said Parcel 2 is Shown on Map No. 4232 recorded 1n Book 40, pages 57 and 58 of parcel maps, said portion being a strip of land 40 feet in width and lying 20 feet each side of the following described center line, Beginning at a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 2 distant thereon N89; 53'29"E 173.58 feet from the northwest corner of said Parcel 2; thence from said point of beginning 50; 11'37"N 248,83 more or less to a point on the southerly line of said Parcel 2, distant thereon 169.48 feet from the southwest corner of said Parcel 2. _ _ Nrot~rvn ~lV.~~ _ ~ _ ._ Northwest Corn•r of Parctl 2 _ 173.58' _ _ _ ~~, N 89. 33' 29' E 1 l {0 Accsss q I Eussnent 1 f~~^~ I Par. 2 Yt-~1 fj°~i l 1 l South•sst Carn•r of Paresl 2 ~ ~ ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SNaII~ERQi(i DIVISION ~ V N rrn~: TPP1.~ M~ // l~ N/GHL ANO AVENUE ~r ~,("j' 11 PROJEC ,LP ~~e' LOCAT/C L~ ~~~ nrw rraE ~~~ ~O~ 1 54' I S~ ~ ~RP~ I t~ a ~ ~ .,~~ ~ ~U G'Jr ~0. - ~~1~ Z Qg, 1 ~~ _ W e K.nei' swn ~~1 ~ i I t mho '~ 07 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I w,.<<a ~. ~~ ~ v ~, 7,~f~ N I f~ ~ 0"` ~ E . ~ TRACT N0. 9305 t ~Et• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMEERIIQ(} DIVISION / V N rr~a: T1TL& /!C/N/T~' MAP err: "C ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _y; STAFF REPORT °~ ~,.~~. .~yCSt , T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 8Y: Tom Gra hn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ET IWANDA SP EC iFIC PL N NDMEN 90-01 - C TY R CHO CUC Rn amendment to the Eti wa nda Specific Pan pertaining to the proposed removal of existing Eucalyptus windrows as a result of the alignment of Summit Avenue west of Eti wa nda Avenue and other street alignments. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recomne nds that the City Council approve Eti wa nda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01, consisting of two items. First, the amendment would permit removal of a Eucalyptus windrow identified for preservation by the specific plan. Second, the nMwon• „lA mndl Fv fhe ~o of nF •ho on fir nlan allnwinn Olanninn Commission approval of tree removal ~~requests subject to certain conditions, including required replacement. In addition, the issuance of a Negative Declaration is also recommended. If the City Council concurs, the attached Ordinance should be adopted. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13812 was approved by the City Council on December 1, 1988, and included a condition for the construction of Summit Avenue full-width excluding off-site parkway improvements between the tract and the intersection of Summit Avenue with Eti wa nda Avenue. On January 17, 1990, the City Council recommended adoption of the modified alignment for Summit Avenue for the area east of Tract 13812 and west of Eti wa nda Avenue. In determining the Summit Avenue alignment, the Ctty Council chose an option that would arov idE the least conflict with and mini mite condemnation of existing structures. Asa result of this determination, an alignment was selected that will require the removal of one garage and a windrow containing 31 Eucalyptus trees. CITY COUNCIL STAfF REPORT ESPA 90-01 - CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 15, 1990 Page 2 Watt Iota nd Empire, the developer of Tract 13812, submitted Tree Removal Permit 90-14 for the removal of these 31 Eucalyptus trees whose locations now conflict with rights-of-way improvements far Summit Avenue. The tree locations either conflict with ac teal street improvements or with grading improvements directly adjacent to the street; in either case preservation in place will not be possible. The tree removal application was submitted as a direct result of the Summit Avenue rights-of-way determination. ANALYSIS: Ct iwa rda Spec~f;c Plan identifies several Eucalyptus windrows, including the windrow in question, for protection and preservation (See Exhibit "C"). This and other Eucalyptus windrows identified in the specific plan were selected for preservation, as their location provided the least conflict with future street alignments. However, as development proceeds in the specific plan area there may be occasions where additional tree removals will be necessary. Currently, any removal request fora tree identified for preservation requires Ordinance Amendment to the Etiwa nda Specific Plan. The course of review requires Planning Commission approval, approval by the City Council with first and second readings, and an additional 30-day period prior to approval; a minimum time period of three months. To simplify the process, the Planning Commission is recommending that Sections 5.31.304 (a) and 5.41.201 of the Eti wa nda C nn_.: fi. Alan A_n_ mnAi is nA TFn.n _..ll .1 L~.. ~An nl. nn! __..-- ..-.- ,.. .-.. ...- ..y Commission to approve tree removal requests when necessary without additional amendments to the specific plan, subject to the following findings: a. That the proposed windrow removal is necessary in order to maintain public safety when determining the alignment of public streets; and 6. That no rea sonabie and viable alternative, such as street realignment, exists; and c. That adequate replacement plantings will take place consistent with the Etiwa nda Specific Plan standards; and d. That the orooosed windrow removal, inuethnr yfth the en nditinns thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or fmproveme nts in the vicinity. The proposed text amendment to the specific plan contains provfsion5 for the replacement of trees. However, at this time replacement plantings for trees removed with Tree Removal Permit 90-14 are not recommended, as tree replacement will 6e required as development occurs on adjacent property. ~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESPA 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 15, 1990 Page 3 FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In reviewing t'ne proposed amendment, the Planning Commis Sion determined that Lhe following findings could be made: c, T` `hc ^^<ed Eti wa nda Specific Plan Rmendment will nat he detrimental ^'to adjacent proper ttes or cnu s~ ciyr,if:ca nt environmental impacts; and 6. That the proposed Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment provides for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management of the City; and c. That the proposed Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Additional information on this item is available in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report. neape}•,riuT'auu~e ~' , ~// L' Br Bul r City nner 88:TG:m1g Attachments: Minutes of May 23. 1990 Planning Commission Meeting P la nnfng Commission Staff Report of May 23, 1990 Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-67, Recommending Approval 0^d!ra,^.ce Adopii,^,^, Et'.we^.da Spec:f:c Plan Amendment 90-01 W ~;,, H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE SSMENI AND ETINANOA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 - ~~ nr.nunu wcnnunun - nn amenmienc w cne cclwa naa apeclrlc Tian per a n ng a proposed removal of existing Eucalyptus windrows as a result of the alignment of Summit Avenue west of Eti wands Avenue and other street alignments. Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Yice-Chairnmn Chitiea opened the public hearing; but hearing no testimony, she closed it. Yice-Chairman Chitiea stated there were two issues: removal of the specific tr~ee~and changAng-of the process. She felt that removal in this instanco m,y ... ........ .°j .... vy~.r.-iyi .a w. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the trees needed to be removed and replaced and he thought the requirements should be amended. wmnia aiune, riei ~iror aLa leu iirc ~nanye regYiied tirai rigorOYS rlnainga De maQe to allow removal of trees, and he Felt the change appeared to be lorthwhil e. Vice-Chairman Chitiea stated that because a public hearing would still be required, she felt the change might 6e appropriate. She pointed out that the Commission must make findings that no reasonable or viable alternative is available and the trees must be replaced. VT ce-Chairman reopened the pu611c hearing. Jar. Peterson, P. 0. Box 3007, Arcedla, stated that she owns property on Summit. She felt the removal of the trees on Summit should not be necessary to put in a road. She stated a dirt road is now in place and she felt an improved road could Just be Dlaced where the dirt road exists without removal of the trees. She obJected to 31 trees being removed 1n order to construct the street. Vice-Chairmen Chitiea asked the condltton of the trees. Mr. Grahn responded that al l tees appear to be heal thy, but there has not been an arborist's report. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to assure Ms. Peterson that the Planning Conraission and City Council have acted 1n a direction to preserve as many trees as possible, but unfortunately some heritage trees must be removed. Vice-Chairman Chitiea asked if the reallgraaent were to curve, if tt would still necessitate removing all or most of the trees. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated that the location 1s fixed at Etlwerda Avenue. He said they considered moving the rad north, but tt would necessitate removal of two houses W then bring the rad Deek down. He stated City Council chose to affect the least number of houses. He said that 1n Planning Coawisslon Minutes -11- May 23, 1990 O~ order to save the trees by the Peterson's property, it would De necessary to remove two houses. Yice-Chairman Chitiea again closed the public hearing. Yice-Chairmmn CMtiea agreed with City Council that it Ss better b remove the trees than the structures. Comisstoner Tolstoy felt there was no other alternative Dossibla. Ne stated that changing the procedure would not mean that trees will be removed more easily, He recomaended approval of the amendment as recoamended. MOt10n: MUVed by lelatey, Secofpea u~ rie)Cner w bGi,pL Gn0 Ke SOIYL10n recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01, Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, M0.CNER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNI0., NEINBERGER -carried • . + a ~ I PI o um esidenttal (8-14 dwelling units per for 3.56 acres of la looted at the southeast comer of Archlb Avenue and Church Street. he Ctty wtil also consider Nelghbo Commercial and Low Medium Res ttal as aitematlve designations 1077-332-26. J. CI~~IRV111'ICi~11,L J'ppl Mu YLILLVII'i ~~ vi u, ni GT i~nuiwn. rcques ame a ve opmen ~s roc s ap rom rofessional) "M" (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre for 3.56 res of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue d C h Street. The City wail also consider "NC" (Neighborhood Comaerc and "LM" (Low Medium Residential) as -alternative designations - 1017-332-26. Brad butler, City Planner ted the ap cant has a pro~ett currently in the design review process requested that a items be continued to allow concurrent review. stated the items would readvertised. Vice-Chairmmn Ch ea opened the public hearing; bu aring no testimony, she closed it. it was consensus of the Planning Commission to con a Envtronmental Assess t and General Plan Amenbaent 90-O1B and Environments ssessment and Dev pment District Naendment 90-02 to an unspecified date to ow them to b onsidered concurrently with the development proposal. Planning Commission Minutes -12- May 23, 1990 8s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 23, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ~.. iii. ui uu Buiier, ciCy Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWAN O_A SPECIFIC PLAN nrinir uME6i yv-ui - An amenament to the Etiwanda Specific Plan pertaining to the proposed removal of existing Eucalyptus windrows as a result of the alignment of Summit Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue and other street alignments. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13812 was approved by the City Council on December 7, 1988, with a condition far the construction of Summit Avenue, full-width excluding off-site parkway improvements, between the tract and the intersection of Summit Avenue. On January 17, t990, the City Council recommended adoption of the modified alignment for Summit Avenue for the area east of Tract 13812 and west of Etiwanda Rvenue lsee Ezh ibit a..'1 Prior Lo the adoption of the modified street alignment of Summit Avenue by the City Council the actual alignment needed to be established. Following approval of Tract 13812, the City Engineering Division was working with the developer in obtaining the necessary rights-of-way when a conflict was indicated by the San Bernardino County Surveyor that the actual location of the Summit Avenue alignment could not be determined. This was due to conflicr,i ng survey in forma Lion, ambiguous wording in deeds, and the possibility that the original subdivider may have not had legal title to the land. When the ambiguity of property ownership had been de*.e rmined, the City Council was faced with a dilemma, The alignment of Sunznit Avenue had to be established, and the alignment would either conflict with existing structures or with a Eucalyptus windrow designated for preservation by the Etiwanda Spetiffc Plan. In determining the street alignment the City Council chose the option that would provide the least conflict and minimize the condemnation of existing structures. As a result, an alignment was selected that will require the removal of one garage and the Eucalyptus windrow. PLANNING COMMISSION S,,,FF REPORT ESPA 90-01 - Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment May 23, 1990 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A, General: Tree Removal Permit 90-14 was filed with the Planning Division, for the removal of 37 Eucalyptus trees, whose location conflicted with the rights-of-way improvements F,.. c..,,.,,:. n.......- The Etiwanda Specific Plan identifies several Eucalyptus windrows as well as other Palm, Pepper, Silk Oak, and Olive trees as being worthy of protection and preservation (see Exhibit "C"). The intent of windrow preservation is established through Section 3,36 by stating the following objective: `'The preservation and perpetuation of a windbreak system, equal to or better than the existing windbreak system, should be promoted for reasons of public safety, wind protection, histor lc al significance, and aesthetics." Further, Sections 5,31 .304 (a) and 5.41,201 state "Existing windrows Located along or within public street rights-of-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be preserved." By stating these objectives and requirements, the specific plan clearly indicates that the windrow 7n question was intended to be preserved, maintained, and supplemented with tree plantings to enhance the aDDea ra nce of the windrow and add to its historical significance. The Tree Preservation Ordinance was es to b115hed to provide wnin wnirui mechanism ror t:ne preserve iron of trees throughout the City by establishing criteria for the protection of "Heritage Trees." However, it also allows the consideration of a tree(s) removal when the removal is necessary for the construction of required improvements within the public street rights-of-way. Revisions to the Etiwanda S ecific Plan: The Euta lyptus windrows dentified in igu re 5-1 were selected for preservation as their location provided the least conflict with future street alignments. However, as in this case, there will be occasions where additional tree removals may be necessary. Any request for the removal of these windrows currently requires an Ordinance Amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan, The course of review requires Planning Commission approval, approval by the City Coun[it with first and second readings, and an additional 30-day period prior to approval; a time period minimum of 3 months. To simplify the process, the Commission may want to consider modifying Sections 5.31.304(a) and 5.41.201 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. These revisions I PLANNING LOMMISS ION S,.,rF REPGRT ESPA 90-01 - Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment May 23, 1990 Page 3 would allow for Planning Commission review and approval of tree removal requests, when necessary, without additional amendments to the Specific Plan. This would require the following text amend~nen ts, highlighted in bald print: Section 5.31.304(a ), Pa ge 5-31: Except as noted in Section 5.41.201, existing mature trees located within or along pu btic street rights-of-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be preserved and supplemented with plantings in accordance with street cross-sections, Fi qu re 5-20 th rovoh 5-40. Section 5.41.201. Paoe 5-31: Except as specified belor, existing windrows located along or withfn public street rights-of-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be preserved. Individual trees or sections of such windrows which are diseased or damaged by fire shall be replaced with 15-gallon size Eucalyptus Macu la to iSpa tied Gum Eucalyptus) to match existing pattern and spacing. However, the Planning Coa>wi ssion shall have the authority to approve a Tree Reagval Perwit subletL to the following findings: (a) That the proposed windrow re~oral is necessary in order to waintain public safety when detereining the alignment of pu611c streets. (b) That no reasonable and viable alternative, such as street real ignaw!nt, extsu. (c) That adequate replacewent plantings rill take place, consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Standards. (d) That the proposed windrow reaMtval, together rith the conditions thereto, will not be detriaw!ntal to the public health, safety, or welfare or auterially injurious to properties or taprorewents in the vicinity. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Before approving the Specific Plan Amendment, the P ann ing Commission must determine that the amendment will not be detrfinen tai to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed amendment is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and Ii of the initial Ludy and has found no 51gn1fita nt environmental impacis as a consequence to this amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 8~" PLANNING COMMISSION ~,.,FF REPORT ESPA 90-01 - Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment May 23, 1990 Page 4 V. CORRESPONDENCE: This items has been advertised as a public hearing in The Oaily Re ~Ort newspaper, the property posted with the supplemental notification sign, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the pro,l ect site. 'J I. RECOMMEN DAT[ON: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a REs~lution of Approval recommending to the City Council that they j approve ~i Wanda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01 through adoption of the ~a ttfy ed Resolution, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. bmityed, Brad Bu 1,Yer City P nner BB: TG/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - location Map Exhibit "B" - Modified Street Alignment for Summit Avenue Exhibit "C" - ESP Figure 5-13 Exhibit "0" - ESP Figure 5-13 Amended Ezhi bit "E" - ESP Figure 5-6 Resolution of Approval 8~ _---+--T--~-tea'-' i . ' ~ i ~ - , -- -- ~ ' ~ '; ;`~ ~, __ -- ~ T '. _ __ _ _ _. .-__ . - - ~ - ,-SUMMIT AVE _ ~ i ~ ~ .r____ L~ ~' ~ i ~_, ! I L. ~ ~ II - ~ T^'~ V r (I I i , CC V ` ~ i ~~~ - I - c HIGH~~NO AVFi_~ ~~ '~ i I I ~ ~~ ~ ~W ~~ > 111 ii I~mL-~ ~ I ~ ~ u f TT~\1 ` ~ ~~ _~ _ .-~+ ^ _ W Cl'Il' OF UCAMONGA rreM. r P ION mLe:~I ~---- N 90 ~: sue: ~-- rr tai .:I s4 ~~ e= Wi V 1 ~Y~Y ~~ i ~~3 ~y 7~ L y ~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~~ I •!~ r~ ~~ ~~ ~~ . ~~ ~ a ~~~. ,~ ~ n ~~ F ~~! ~ iE ,~ i (': ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ /y ~ -- -~--.~ ~~~~ ~' i 1F [ '` ~~~; ~ ~~,- ~_~~ ~~~ :ui ~ ~ € ~ ,~ :ts ~~ ~i ~~ r ~r ~ ,~ ~, ~ `( ~-I ,;I a sill y _~ m U W Mi ~A z U H +,v~ ~ U 9~ :• rw snu[r /~~ ~ ._~ ~\ Ilrr Mari /' ~ j/ i~ailvr~i / ~ ~ / ~, ~I v,rcpie j,~_ ~ ~~I4 prpK ra iiWW~~ ~' j ~_ /_~ % /EXISTING STREET -~~r-`----1r' TREES TO BE PRESERVED j '~ ~ ~ ~~~ Existing Windbreaks _ { ..I~.. - ~i % NYi'w M' Exbting Trses i ~,' aw.lrvw i !I Maw roams aw. _ .~ i ir- /~ ~ ` ~_ tills figure -~;! '~ .'; STREET TREE ~,~ 1 ~ ~~ ~, PRESERVATION CRY OF _ ~ UCAMONGA ~M' P ION T~F:~~uura, 9~1~ 1V 9~ 1. ~~ err: ~ sue: - x~ rr i% _ J .__ __ TOXIC X~XX L~ / ~ aea~e `_ ~ ^~ a _ ,aua ova-~{ ~;.!/ ~- _~ ~~/ ~~ OIh~ OFOw ~ ~/ ~' /i ~/~ ~~ /~~~ _/ % -~ / .,~ %~~~. EXISTING STREET ES TO BE PRESERVED ~i rr. ExietMg WMdbreaks 1 r.xs. ~~.~ Existing Trees j Y~o«., w or. _~' / ~/ ~. STREET TREE ~_ 1 PRESERVATION cm OF UCAMONGA `~`~~~ E" JO1 P ION T[ILE`~~ 9 I~ T! 9~ ,~ err; '~ sc~: - ~. ~~ - - -- ~i ~? - ~= i // ~' // ~~ ~~ ~j ~~ • Freeway Accssa >• MaJor Arterial ~~ Secondary Arterial 'dl~iirin Special Design Collector ~n~nunf Local Streets STREET SYSTEM 5_g rr~: o -o _ C11Y OF _ UCAMONGA ,~.~.1,~:~A~~r 5.~ N P ION n 11 q~ >~~: ~ sue: - RESOLUTION N0. 90-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CAL IfORN IA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL Of ETIWAN DA SPECt FIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, AMENDING FIGURE 5-+3 ANO SECTIONS 5,31,304 (a) ANO 5,41.201 OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN PERTAINING TO THE PRESERVATION OF EUCALYPTUS WINDROWS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT .nrRcrF A. Pecitals. (i) the City of Rancho Cucamonn:, ti~< c.:...,^~, c__ ~.. - °: `:~~-~ d.. appi iCd ClOn fOr ~reC~~~~ rian Wnendment 90-Ot as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." Iii) On May 23, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. !iii) Ali legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determinaA, anA rnentvoe ~_.,, ._,.,, F loon ing ~ommtsston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; i. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ?. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 23, 1990, inc?uding written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, thfs Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part 1I; and Ibl The prq posed amendment is rec es sa rv to allow fn. tHn r eiaovai of a Eucalyptus windrow Sdentified for preservation by Figure 5-13 of the Eti wa nda Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 97 PLANNING COMMISSION RESCLUT ION N0. 90-67 ESPA 90-O1 - ETIUAN OA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT May 23, 1990 Page 2 (al That the proposed amendment is necessary in order to maintain public safety when determining the alignment of public streets. !hl That no reasonable and viahle alternative exists, such as street realignment, ~! That Ne pro pus ed amendment, together with the conditions thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. id? That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the nhia~}iyn~ of tMC Gcii2idi Piaii ui tine Etiwa ndtl Spec lfiC i'ldn. 4. This Commission hereby finds that Lhe project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of ?970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Oeclara tion. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 7, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: fat That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Ra rt ho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of May 1990, Eti wa nda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01 amending Sections 5,3t,304(a) and 5.41.201 and Figure 5-I3 as follows: Section 5.31.304!a!: Except as noted in Section 5.4 L20~, existing mature trees located within or along public street rf ghts-of-way specified in Figure 5-i3 shaii be preserved and supplemented with plantings in accordance with street cross-sections, Figure 5-20 through 5-40, Section 5.41.201: Except as specified below, existing windrows located along or within public street rights-of-way specified 1n Figure 5-13 shall be preserved. tnd iv idual trees or sec ttons of such windrows which are diseased or damaged by fire shall be repiaced with 15-gallon size Eucalyptus Maculata !Spotted Gum Euca lyptusl to match existing pattern and spacing, However, the Planning Commission shall have the authority to approve a Tree Removal Permit subject to the following findings: (a1 That the proposed windrow removal is necessary in order to maintain pu blfc safety when determining the alignment of public streets. ib) That no reasonable and viable alternative, such as street realignment, exists. 9S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTE ON N0. 9U-61 ESPA 90-01 - ETIWAN OA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT May 23, 1990 Page 3 ~c` That adequate replacement plantings will take place, consistent with the Eti Wanda Specific Plan Standards. 'd1 That Lhe proposed windrow removal, together with the conditions thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, ar welfare or materially ~u~'~+JD Cv yru yci L ce ur impruvemen is in ine v~ic inity. Piau re 5-!?: IAttached~ !b! That the Planning Commiccinn hereby rec miuaen:ie that the City Cu unc ii approve and adopt Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-O1. !c1 That a Certified Copy of the Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopt ian of this Resolution, APPROVED AND A00 PTED TW IS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 1890. PLANNING COMMISSION OF [TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ce ena lrman ATTEST I, Arad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commf scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranc ha Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of May, 1990, by the following vote-ta-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIE.4, MELCHER, TULSTOY NONE MCNIEL, WEINBERGER 99 ,. ,~~. f~ n~ ~% s _ _*o~ r~nn ~ a i/ 1 i ~' ~~~~~. i / I i~ ~ ~;, 4 /Oo Wwr ~ j ~~~ -~f / J~~ i, '/7~~/ /~J i EXfSTMi~i STREET EES TO BE PRESERVED ~~+ Existing Wktdbreaks .wn. Existing Tnss w owe AktENDED dle - figure STREET TREE 5_ ~ 3 PRESERVATION ORDINANCE N0. ~p~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROY ING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01, AMENDING FIGURE 5-13 AND SECTIONS 5.31 .304(a) AND 5.41.201 OF THE ETINANOA SP ECIFiC PLAN PERTAINING TO THE PRESERVATION OF EUCALYPTUS WINDROWS. AND MAK[NG FINOI NGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals (il Dn May 77 LOBO: the Planning C~mmic cipn of the fity pf Re qr hn Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Eti wa nda Specific Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-67, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Etiwa nda Specific Plan Amendment 90-01. (ii) On August 15, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All Legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. .,. ~ ...~... v. .~~. .. t,~ i ~.u i~V i~V ,.Y 1Y~11V IIlJO VI VU III] C] 1VIIVw]: Section 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set Forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the ordinance are true and co met t. Section 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in complia me with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. Section 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: (a) That the proposed amendment is necessary in order to maintain public safety when determining the alignment of the public streets; and (b) That no reasonable and vfable alternative, such as street realignment, exist; and ~~~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. ESPA 90-01 -CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGR RUGUST 15, 1990 Page 2 (c) That the proposed amendment, together with the conditions thereto, will not he detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or ma to rialiy injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and °~~°~` ~ will lvt ue ueirime0 tai LO Lne objectives of the General Plan or the Etiwa nda Spec+fic Pia n. Section 4: That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve on the 15th day of August 1990, Etiwa nda spen fu Pian amendment 90-01 amending Sec lions S.3i.3G4(d) a,.d 5 "1 2^1 and Figure 5-13 to read as follows: Section 5.31.304(a): Except as noted in Section 5.41.201, existing mature trees located within or along public street rights-of-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be preserved and supplemented with plantings in acct rda ace with street cross-sections, Figure 5-20 through 5-40. Section 5.41.201: Except as specified below, existing windrows located along or within public street rights-of-way specified in Figure 5-13 shall be preserved. Individual trees or sections of such windrows which are diseased or damaged by fire shall be replaced with 15-gallon size Eucalyptus mac ulata (Spotted gum Eucalyptus) to match existing pattern and spacing. However, the Planning Commission shall have the autho rf ty to approve a Tree Removal Permit subject to the following findf ngs: (a) That the proposed windrow removal is necessary in order to maintain public safety when determining Lhe alignment of public streets; and (b) That no reasonable and viable alternative, such as street realignment, exists; and (c) That adequate replacement plantings will take place, consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards; and (d) That the proposed windrow removal, together with the conditions thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Figure 5-13: (Attached.) Section 5: the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and sha cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Valle Dail Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the C ty of Ontario, a ifornta, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, ~bd- t. n~ Oror~ ii nne a j% 7ir~L~~ ~i '" n ?-' / _ ~ =~~~~ .C ~~ ~ ~~,. =run .ve ~~ ~ ~/ ,~ ~ ~i ~/ !w~ /~ rpoT~y •.9. ~/ ~~ r/~ ';~ ~; -~I ~ ... _- `, /, ~i ~i EXISTING STREET %~q/ TREES TO BE PRESERVED ~+~+ Existing WMdbrsaks r~w.~ --~ Exbtq~p Trees W OY~ A&IENDED title }i9ur~ STREET TREE 5-13 PRESERVATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 •iv: eiayor and riamuene wf ....a ...tp ...,W,cil FROH: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Hanager SUBJECT: CORSIDBRATION OP AN ORDIRARCB RRODLATIBO PDBLIC S6TRY ABD OCCOPA1iCY 01 PORTBD CITY PROPERTY Reoomm~Ddatioa it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance which restricts entry and occupancy of certain city owned property which are posted and not open to the public. The City has several facilities which, for the purposes of reduced liability exposure, should be restricted tc access by the general nnhlir mhia Pwrt was nninted nut to C{tv staff bV the Citv's insurance provider. Facilities such as the City yard, or the underground parking facility at the Civic Center are examples of such facilities. The proposed ordinance restricts entry and occupancy of City owned properties that have been posted to peace officers, City employees acting in the course of their employment, ar other persons having express permission oP a duly authori2ed City employee. By restricting access to these areas, the opportunities for members of the public being injured by the normal work activities in these facilities is reduced, thus reducing the City's liability exposure. R/e/s~p~ectfully Submitted, V ~V.~~, DAB:tlr DAB:373 Attachment JVN- B-?O FRI 14:43 MHRKMGaN ~ QRC2YNS K.2 P02i04 ORDINANCE NO. ~~ AN ORDINANC8 OF THE CITY COLTDiCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCEO CIICAHONOA REOULATIHO FUHLIC ENTRY AND OCCUPANCY OF Y08TED CITY PROPERTY. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLI.oWSt @9Qtj-4n 3• Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Coda Sa hereby amended by the addition of a new chapter 9.20 to read, in words and tiqu Yes, as follows: °S~ieX 9.20 n~~ mil OCCUPANCY 4K P4~' ~ S'.ITY j~$OPERTY. ..e en.n~n p~ Hereon other than a peace oPticer, City employee acting within the course and scope of employment, or other parson having express permission of a duly autriorized city employee, shall enter or remain upon, or tall or refuse to leave upon a City employee's request, any City-owned property not open to the public, provided such property has been posted with a sign or signs in plain eight at entrances to such property. Such signs shall be readable from not less than twenty-five (25) Leet end shall atatei 'CLOSED TO PUBLIC - vxoLATORS BUBJEC'+' TO ARREST.' / ~1 SUN- ,3-90 FRI 14 46 MARK MfaN a RRC2YNSKi Pe3iO4 "9.20.020 It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements oP this Chapter. Any person violating any provision of this chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty oP a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a Pine not exceeding $1,000.00, c~ by imprisonment not exceeding six (G) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion Ehnreo! during which any violation of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, and shall ba deemed punishable therefor as provided in this Chapter." @14S1.4I1 1• Tha City Council declarns that should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or words of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason oL any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, suctions, paragraphs, sontencea, and words oP this Ordinance shall remain in full force end effect. Beotion 3• Tha City Clerk shall certify to the passage OP this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in T}~g Dally Ranort, a ~~ 2 JUN- 3-90 FRI 144T MARKMAN a'1 ARCZYN3KI PO4%O4 newspaper oP general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1990. I, Debra Adame, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of thn City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1990, and was Finally passed at a regular seating of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1990 by the following vote: AYE5: COVNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENTt COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST' Debra Adams, C ty Clark city of Ranehe CUCamotlga / ^~ C111i1aa) 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City .,aray-a FROM: Joe Schulte, CLP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: BANNER POLICY REVISION AND APPLICATION APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval oP attached street banner applications, corresponding policy revisions and adminis- trative procedure which establishes fees. BACRGRODND During the past year the Council, through the Planning Department, approved the use of street banners for event advertising. The implementation policy was given to the Community Services Department to administer. Community R P.YV 1l!aa Dona rtmont a/•aPP WYnw an aAminivMaMiva nr~nnoA..~e to accompany the City~s Policy (attached). The attached procedure and banner applications were voted on and recommended for approval by the Perk and Recreation Commission on July 19, 1990, with recormendatione Por policy changes. ANALYSIS During the application and recommendation phase of the banner approval process, several i•eues became evident. The Park and Recreation Commission and etaPP Pelt the current policy only allowed the Founders Day Parade and July 4th events to be aPPZOVed. Therefore, the following changes to the policy are requested: • City events should hove City logo on banner. • Events each as Red Ribbon Week should be allowed end the policy changed to provide Por slogans or messages on banners. BANNER POLICY REVISION AND APPLICATION APPROVAL August 15, 1990 Page 2 • Policy does not allow for statement on admission fee which could lead to anger on the part of citizens who are enCOYIIIICed to nartieinwtg v4*hnnt 1rnpyl~Q y~+, regarding admission charge. • Wording of policy should be changed to sat two categorise. 1. Be for a community-wide event, open to the general public and be of significance to the City~s heritage, or 2. Be a City oP Rancho Cucamonga sponsored event. Respectfully submitted, Jo Schultz community se i es Director JS/XS/kla i IQ9 ~~ PROPOSED POLICY ATTACHMENT „A° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BANNER POLICY APPROVALS Requests to hang a banner must be made in writing to the Department of Community Services prior tc August 1 of every year. The banner must: Be for a community-wide event, open to the general public, and be of significance to the City's heritage, OR n Ae e~ ,,...,,e ,.;~.. ,.F n~ ,.,,,. - - Be approved by the City Council. DURATION only six special event banners per location are permitted during each calendar year and may only be displayed Por a period of up to two weeks. The City reserves the right to take any and all six display periods. However, a hearing of the Park and Recreation Commission will ba held in September of each year to consider all applications that have been deeme3 complete ar.3 submitted with fee prior to August 1. Final approval shall be made by the City Council. BANNER LOCATION The only designated banner locations are on Archibald north of Foothill and Base Line west of Haven. SPECIFICATIONS All banners are three feet in height and thirty Peet in length, and upon receipt of a proposed message and required fee, the City will cause the preparation of the banner to begin and will display the banner during the approved display period. The sign copy shall be limited to the event name, date, time, location, logo, admission tae, slogan or massage. r~inai approval of the message on the banner will ba made by the City Council with the approval of the application. The installation and removal of the banner will be the responsibility of the City. Following the display period, the banner will be returned to the applicant. The established fee includes installation and removal of the bennar. Additional fees will be charged !or banner preparation at market price. /' O Street Banner Application Organization: Contact Person: Address: Street Mailing Atldress: Work Phone: Home Phone: Event: Date(s) of Event: Brief Description of Event: Proposed Banner Signage: Use space provided or attach a copy of proposed Signage. Include name of event, date, time and location. Colors to 6e Used: Requested dates of Banner Display: From: To: Location of Banner: Archibald/FOOthiil Base Line/Haven I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Application. I have bean fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its' officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may 6e sustained white this banner is posted. vlgnatufa: Daid: Date Reviewed By Stafl: Date Heard by Perk & Recreatbn Commission: Recommentled by Commission: Yes No Date Heats by City Council: Coundl Actbn: Approvetl Denied e/oo City of Rancho Cucamonga ~.,~ Community Services Depanment aT^~c::~-r ^~^ Ctty Statl Use Only Fees: Payabb to City of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Install & Remove: $ AdministratNe $ Preparatbn $ I / / Total $ SUBJECT: BANNER POLICY AD?IINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE Effective: (Council Annroval Date1 Purpose: To provide information on the administration and monitoring of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Banner Policy. PM irv• n ..o "^^~ .~~ .„`.o yvli~y L~ o.::-: i.`.~ u ~ y u.r. Binnning Department `and approved by uthe6 City Council and is attached as Attachment "A". Definitions: 1. co munity-wide Ev n On n to -orn.,.i AihH n~ Events which the entire City is encouraged to be involved in or invited to. 2. sicniPicance to t_ha Citv's Herit~n~• Evanta that promote, enhance or portray the City's history. 3. Snonsored by the Citv: Events or activities provided and sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonca. Procedure: 1. Obtain City Banner application Prom Community Services Department, sea Attachment "B". 2. Return application and corresponding Pees to Community Service Department baPore August 1 oP each year. Fees should be made payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Only applications which era Pully complete will advance to the approval process. Approval Process: 1. Application must fulfill both of the following conditions to ba considered by the Park and Reoraation commission and city Council. a) Be for a community wide event open to the ganerel public, and ba oP •ignificanca to the city's heritage. b) Ha sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. l 1I , BANNER POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE Page 2 2. If the above conditions are met, the application will be submitted along with all other applications to the Park and Recreation Commission. 3. The Commission will review all applications at their September Commission meeting and forward their recommendations to the City Council for Pinal approval. 4. Final approval will occur at the next Council meeting following the monthly Park and Recreation Commission meeting. 5. Once final approval has been obtained, CSD Staff will notify applicant on the statue of their application. Terms & Conditions: 1. No banner can be made or displayed in advance of Pinal approval by the City Council. The City assumes no liability or coats for banners which applicant has made prior to Pinal approval by the city Council. 2. Banners must meet the following requirements: Size: Three feet high by thirty feet long. Signage: Is limited to event name, date, time and location oP the avant, logo, admission Sea, slogan or message. Material: Ba able to withstand constant exposure to various weather elements for a two week period of time. 3. Display of a banner will not exceed two weeks. 4. The City will be responsible for the installation and removal of the banner. The City ie not reaponeible for sign damago occurring during the installation, display and removal of the banner. 5. The City reserves the right to take down any banner which has become a hazard to the public. 113 BANNER POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDDRE Page 3 6. IP desired by the applicant, the City will have the banner made by a vendor. Applicant is responsible for paying in advance Por the !'°.^.^.~r ~.rC~IIdiOn. If baiu.oi i6 3G.'.ateu, ..h> signage cannot be created until after the approval process is Piniehed. 7. Banners should ba delivered to the City's Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Monday thru Friday from e:oo am to 5:00 pm. 8. Banners cannot be installed by city crews until a representative of the Community Services Department has checked the banner for compliance with the Aannar Policy and corresponding approved application. 9. No changes in the approved banner mesange can be made once approved by the City Council. l0. The City reserves the right to refuse install- ation of banners that do not meet the approved application. The applicant forfeits all money and expenses incurred in such signage. li. banners once removes from their location will be available for pick-up at the City's Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Monday thru Friday, from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Any unclaimed banners will be discarded after two weeks. 12. Banners can be reused annually iP the signage is in good repair as determined by Community Service and Engineering Departments Stale. The organization will still need to apply annually via the Hannar Policy Procedure for banner display. Fee's & Charges: $75.00 ~ Inatallatian and removal fee per banner. $50.00 - Administrative Pee it city bacomae involved in creation and preparation of the banner. (Applicant is rasponsibla for actual coat of banner - pnyebla in advance.) I /~ CURRENT POLICY ATTACE: ",.t~"f "A" CItt OF RPNCHO CUCANONGA BANNER rOLICY APPROVAL 5 Requests to harp a banner mist be made in writing to the Department of Commrnity Services prior to August 1 of every year. The banner mist: j_I ne nor a comes mty-w roe event am open to the general pub iic, arai ~_j Be of significance to the City's heritage, and j~ Be sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and 3e approved by the City Ca ncil. DURATION Only siz special event banners per location are permitted during each calendar year and may only be displayed for a period of up io two weeks. The City reserves the right to take arty and all six display periods. However, a hearing of the Park and Recreation Commission wSll be held in September of each year to consider all applications that have been deemed co~lete and submitted with fee prior to August 1. Final approval shall be made by the City Council. BANNER LOCATION The only designated banner locations are on A.rchib old north of rootm t i ana mace une west or Haven. SPECIFICATIONS All banners are three feet in height and thirty feet in length, and upon receipt of a proposed nes sage and required fee, the City will cause the preparation of the banner t0 begin and will display the banner dining the approved display period. The sign copy shall 6e limited to the name, date, time, and location of the event. Final approval of the message on the banner will be made by the City Council with the approval of the application. The installation and removal of Lhe banner will be the responsibility of the City. Following the display period, the banner wilt be returned to the app i i wnt. The established fee includes the preparetton, installation, removal, and storage of the banner. 'I S Street Banner Application Organization: Contact Person: Address iviaiiiny HUUi6JJ. cuy zip Work Phone: Home Phone: Fvont~ ___ __ _ Date(s) of Event: Brief Description of Event: Proposed Banner Signage: Use spew provided or attach a copy of proposed Signage. Include name of event, tlate, time antl location. Colors to be Used: Requested dates of Banner Display: From: To: I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limks of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Application. I nave been fusty authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Ctkamottga, its' officers, empbyees end agents from arty antl all liability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: Date: City StaN Use Only Date Reviewed By SIaN: Date Heard by Park 8 Recreation Commission: Recommentled by Commission: Vea No Date Heard by City Council: Council Action: Approved Denied City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department ATTACkC•t£rv; "D" trees: PeyebN to Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga in AMance - Install 8 Remove: 5 Administrative S Preparation $ // ~ Total i Subject: Banner Policy Administrative Procedure Effective: July 1, 1990 Purpose: So provide information on the administration and monitoring of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Banner Policy. Policy: A copy of the policy as submitted by the Planning nenartment and aporeved by the City Coc*.cil p^. is attached as Attachment "A". Definitions: 1. Community-Wide Event Open ~ ~ a hti Events which the entire City is encouraged to ba involved in or invited to. 2. Significance to the Citv's Heritaae• Events that promote, enhance or portray the city's history. 3. Soonaored by h i v: This ie meant as a philosophical sponsorship or willingness to support the intent o! the event. The uas oP sponsorship dose not include financial or litigation support. Procedure: 1. Obtain City Bannez application from Community Service Department, see Attachment "8". 2. Return application and corresponding tees to Community Service Department before August 1 of each year. Fee's should ba made payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Only applications which are fully complete will advance to the approval process. Approval Process: ~. Application must fulfill ail the following conditions to be considered by the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council. a) Bo !or a community wide avant open to the general public. b) Be o! significance to the city's heritega. c) eo sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga I f 2. If the above conditions are met, the application will ba submitted along with all other applications to the Park and Recreation commission. 3. Tha Commission will review all applications at their September Commission meeting and forward their recommendations to the City Council for Pinal approval. 4. Final approval will occur at the next Council -^~ -- m t:.a ovs.inly rarx ana Recreation Commission meeting. 5. Once final approval has been obtained, CSD Staff will notify applicant on the statue of their application. Terms & Conditions: 1) No banner can be made or displayed in advance of linal approval by the City Council. The City assumes no liability or costa for banners which applicant has made prior to final approval by the City council. 2) Sannera must mast the following requirements: Size: Three teat high by thirty feet long. Gi•omIDetm: Signage: Wording is limited to name, data, time and location of the event. maceriai: ne able to withstand constant exposure to various weather elements for a two weak period of time. 3. Display of a banner will not exceed two weeks. 4. Tha City will be responsible for the installation and removal of the banner. The City is not reeponalble for sign damage occurring during the installation, display and removal of the banner. 5. Tha City reserves the right to take down any banner which has become a hazard to the public. '' 6. If desired by the applicant, the City will have the banner made by a vendor. Applicant is responsible Yor paying in advance Yor the banner production. If banner is donated, the signage cannot be created until after the approval process is finished. 7. Rgnncrc ehnnlA Ha qn't; uA r.. rr~ ..1 t..._ Corporals Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Monday thru Friday Yrom 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. 8. Banners cannot be installed by city crews until a representative of the Community Services Department has checked the banner f~~ compliance with the Banner Policy and corresponding approved application. 9. No changes in the approved banner message can be made once approved by the City Council. 10. The City reserves the right to reYuae installation oP banners thnt do not meet the approved application. The applicant forfeits all money and expenses incurred in such signage. 11. 8annere once removed from their location will be available for pick-up at the Citv'e i.~rporaLn YarC, 9153 Ninth Street, Monday thru Friday, from 8:00 em to 5:00 pm. Any unclaimed banners will ba discarded after two weeks. 12. Banners can be reused annually it the signaga ie in good repair ae determinefl by Community Service and Engineering Departments Sta!!. The organization will still need to apply annually via the Banner Policy Procedure for bnnnar display. Fee's & Chargae: $75.00 - Installation and removal fee per banner. 550.00 - Administration £ea iY City becomes involved in creation and preparation of the banner. (Applicant is responsible for actual cost o! banner - payable in advance.) /~9 BANNER APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL /~© .. Street Banner Application Organization: Contact Person: Address: Slraet Mailing Address:_ Work Phone: ~a Event: Date(s) of Event:, Brief Description of E Proposed Banner Signage: Use space provided or attach a copy of proposed signage. include name of event, date, time and location. Colors to he Used: Requested dates or Banner Display: From: To: I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the CIry of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Application. I have been lolly euthodzed by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby twld harmless the City of Rancho Gucartwnga, its' officers, empbyees and agents from any and all Iladliry ror damages or loss or injury either to persons or property wh~h may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: Date: City Statf Use Only Date Reviewed By Slaff: ~: PayaDN to City or Rancho Cucunong~ in Adv~na Date Heard by Park 8 Recreation Commission: Insta118 Remove: S Recommended by Commisson: Yes No Administrative S Date Heard by Ciry Council: /~ / Preperatbn S Council Action: Approved Denied Total ~ aty Home Phone: zp City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Depanment City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Application Community Services Department - Organization: aanc;•.c c:ca-:o:::.a citi ~ : a.:.~inst s :~t: ncc abuse Contact Person: ?~ulz : ac`.on Ccrmunity Service= De?artment City of 3cnche Cncs;er.3a Address: ,r.-n CS-,ar C~n~~=- -ri va R=nrhr Cucaron oa. CA 9! i3o Street City Zip Mailing Address: same ~a ~~°~~ Work Phone: 9e9-ins© ::zlos Home Phone: 9~>-oose Event: ,F,~ R,t,-.,. t.~,,;, Date(s) of Event: octobcr r:-z~, .990 Brief Description of Event: •., u -;ort for a cru free ortuaunit anc nation. Proposed Banner Signage: Use space provided or attach a copy of proposer! signage. Include name or event, date, time and location. R'cD RIHACN V,'E°n ---- CctcSer 21-27, :99D City LC'O C:~,oice for ma ... Urug Free Sho~,: ;our aupport .or a crag free community -- tear a rcd ri'd.~or. during thin tree:- CCIefS t0 b2 Used: Rec'. anc Blac.'c --- City L°.~o in regular eoloY, Requested dates of Banner Display: From: n~,,.- ;•,, Conn To: ncto5er 2e, .990 -tars ?ut un iaanner '.U-20-90 ~'O1rm I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Appllcatlon. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucanronga, its' officers, employees and agents from any and all (lability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. n ~ 3igi,diuie.J ~.(.~-~~-w~ ~ ~~~v ti~ Data: ~~~-yl' %.1i %7~u ~' City StaN Use Only Date Reviewed By Staff: ~ 9 D Fees: /~ " /'~ / Payable to City of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Data Heard by Park 8 Recreation missbn: ~t Install 8 Remove: $ Recommended by Commfssbn: Yes~ No Administrative $ Dale Heard by City Council: RI~nO Preparation $ Council Aclbn: Approved Denied ~~ ~- Total t City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Application Community Services Dnpanment ' Organization:_~ -/ n.r.~.a~ a~ -~-'fr, ~Ne ~- ~ Contact Person: ~/-6f~,1 ~5~ -,ti' Malllflg %1Ciuivo '//,~,~~~ Work Phone: `,~s'%- /~S~ Home Phone: C'-~'_l~'f ~ Event: y~ Date(s) of Event: Brief Description Proposed Banner algnage: Use space provided or attach a copy of proposed sgnage. Include name of event, date, time and location. rl6 ~ .>FF ~tII'G)`~,/ ~ /V~Li L'r ~~ r,L ~~n Y J/ qK., /(i: ~,.J ~f~~e~~ / //,¢St, d-ra. i, il~"`•~ ~, J,e,1`CUCt'a, ~/;vvt~wv iii.,`r~. •,~. ,. Colors to be Used: Requested dates of Banner Display: From: /O "` lG? To: ~'C'_ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Application. I have been lolly authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby holtl harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its' officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss 6r injury ellhFfJ to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. /~ /j ~/ , Daie: -~ ~~^ J City Staff Use Only Date Reviewed By fait: ~~ Fees: ~~ ~ L ~ Payable to Ciry o1 Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Date Heard by Park 8 Recreatbn C mmission: l.(LYLah Install 8 Remove: $ Recommendetl by Commissbn: Vas No Administretfve $ Date Heard by City Council: r ~ /~~ Preparation $ Council Action: Approved Denied Total $ Street Banner/'Application Organization / . ~~ /. ~ ~~/ Contact Person: City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department - °° utY Zip Mailing Address: ~'/>``~%''~ Work Phone: ~`~fy- /d' ~ ?s Home Phone: ~-=~k ' G 1„ Z ,Sr Event: /tom f S 1 ~ !~ ~ %'~~z~,~~ /(/y C Date(s) of Event: ~~I N //~ /cj9/ Brief Description of Event: h.t~,','; ,,~.rTi ~J d Fk p'~C,,,t~a.v d~ ~~t s Proposed Banner Signage: ..s~R,~' ,!n_h -.s r_ iFr'~-,!/~crN . Use space provided or anach a copy of proposed Signage, Include name of event, tlate, time and location. ~ ~T'tS ~'~' 7"/~~ ~~ !l ~l~ S i yt~~ ~ C.//r`T ~~ ~ ~/ CP~ / /'~/ l`% (ij // ~ ] /(i ~1 of - ~.5 ~ ^^i v L~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~na.l ,~ '~r /~e/~~ j': G ~ ] l l l I •• ~ •~ • ~ „ _ ~ ~ Colors to be Requested dates of Banner Display: From: 1 % ~To: ~ ~ r I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Application. I have been Tully authorized by the atwve organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Ran¢ Cucamonga, its' ofgcers, empbyees end agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or ' fury. either topersons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. ~ / // $ign,anlro; ~~ - vdle: /~ ~-.~ ~" City Staff Use Only Date Reviewed By Staff: ~ 0 Foes; ~~ ~~ ,, ~,, Payable to City of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Dale Heard by Park 8 Recreatlon C mission: ~~~ Install & Remove: $ Recommended by Commission: e/s No Administrative $ Oate Heard by City Council: r4/tq9 y /~ / Preparation $ Council Action: Approved Denied [f Total s Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Application Community Services Depanment - ~ ~ , Organization: Contact Person: r Address: ±C7 ~ /~o fC Mailing Address: r~^'~9>i ..~,c, ~ ~ ~ - i ~' S a' Home Phone: Event: Date(s) of Event: _ Brief Description of Proposed Banner Signage: Use space provided or attach a copy of proposed signage. Include name of event, date, time antl location. ~ y ~'= ~> f ~ ~~~ ~E,I ~~ f i ~ /j. Jc. ,, -H y, p u ,Cr..r.1 . Gofors to be - %<', . I a Requested dates of Banner Display: From: (a .1 To: ,~ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Applicatbn. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its' officers, employees and agents from any and all liability for damages or loss or nfury eitherf to parsons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. / / / , Signature: ^ate: ~`~/` City Staff Use Only Date Reviewed By Staff: B Fees: ~~ ~~ ,, ~,, Payable to Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Date Heard 6y Park 8 Recreation CgLnmission: ~ Install & Remove: $ Recommended by Commissbn: ~ /F'~es\~ No AdministratWe $ Date Heard by City Council: g/~9Ct C Preparation $ Council Action: Approved Danled ~~-.l Total s City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Application Community Services Department - ~fgan12at10n:_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF CO4IPIERCE COrltaCt PerSOn: SUOY CLAYTON Address : azao U[ica Ave., S[e. 16U Rancho Cucamonga 91730 Street City Zip iv!allll!~ HVUrCSS R9R0 nrira Avn Sta. 1F0 Ranrhn nuramnnma. f.A 97710 Work Phone: 9a7-lolz Evert: Date(s) of Event:1 Brief Description of Home Phone: 9sz-1979 Proposed Banner Signage: Use space providec or attach a copy of proposed signage. Include name of event, date, Time and location. W "' se ~/ Colors to be Used:~,U/-fi7E ,(i¢.YN~ .D,4,er~ ®uo/.~~•n.~ lr~~~~~%PS_ Requested dates of Banner' Display: From://J~„_S L_ SeF. X44 To: Mo-n Od~~i~~o) I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Appltcatbn. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its' officers, employees and agents from any and ell liability for tlamages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Yv~ iii. ~ L~ia !- ~ ~. SlgnatureG~'-~u~~/~ Date: !~~/~~ City Staff Use Only Date Reviewed By Staff: - ~ ~ Fees: Payabb to City of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Date Heard by Park & Recreation Commission: ~ /4 9a Install 8 Remove: S Recommended by Commissbn: (Vas) No AdminlslratNe S Date Heard by Clry Council: 9 d Preparation S Council Action: Approved Denied /~ CO Total ~~ ~~ :,S M~ C~0 ~~ w V w ~y ~~ ~~ ~y ~~ ~~ ~s ~a ~ 9j, ~~ 'e F f: City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Application Community Services oepanment - OfganlZaUOn: RANCHO CUCAMONGA CF3AMBER OF COMMERCE Contact Person: ~unY CLAYTON AddreSS: 8280 Utica AVe., Ste. 160 Rancho Cucamonga, 91730 Street Cily Zip Mailing Address: azau uc lca Ave., Ste. 160 Rancho Cucamonga, 91730 Work Phone: 9a7-lolz Home Phone: 9az-1979 Event: Dates Brief [ Proposed Banner Signage: Use space provided or attach a copy of proposed signage. Include name of event, date, time and location. a.~es on ~y Colors to be Used: _ Requested dates of Banner Display: From:.Sf~a 3 To: d~ ? /fig/ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Applicatbn. I have been fully authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its' officers, empbyees and agents from any and atl liability for damages or loss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. /J fl /.n / ". mow' L- n ~i i~ /"~!% Signature:/~~~1"i~ei~o~~~,i Date: 7irio City Stott Use Only Date Reviewed By Stott: 4 ~ ~' Fees: - /,, Payable to City of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Date Heard by Park 8 Recreation C missbn: J (L~LLn Install 8 Remove: $ Recommemfed by Commission: t es No Administrative $ Date Heard by City Council: 8/i.~9[) 11 Preparatbn $ CounGlAcllon: Approved Denied ~dg Total $ City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Banner Application Community Services Depanment - OfganlZ8t10n: RANCHO CUCAMONGA CRMteER OF COMMERCE CentaCt Person: JUDY CLAYTON Address: R28o Utica Ave., Ste. 160 Rancho Cucamonga 91730 .c~rnne ~ "p Mailing Address• 8280 Utica Ave., See. 160 Rancho Cucamonga 91730 Work Phone: 967-lOlz Home Phone: 982-1979 Event: s Date(s) of Event: ~ / ~~ ~~~ / 99/ _ Brief Description of Event: ~~pDS/~7O-yj Proposed Banner Signage: Usa space provided or anach a copy of proposed signage. Include name of event, date, time and location. ~ 5/N~Ss r CaKA~tu~Vi7tJ EXPO ~MII y 17, / 8 Loewfii~ ~. b~ d.,ta~..r..: Cotors to be Used: I~G.v~t`31 uo e- K>° rR Leers rrn, Ulh f~~ hA_12Y1 w Requested dates of Banner Display: From: Mn.~ L, To: M~aQ3 /9~j/ I have received a copy, have read and understand, and agree to abide by the limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Policies regarding this Street Banner Application. I have been fulty authorized by the above organization to submit this form and serve as the primary contact for the organization. I hereby hold harmless the City of Rancho Cucamonga, its' officers, employees and agents trom any and all liability for damages or bss or injury either to persons or property which may be sustained while this banner is posted. Signature: ii ~ ~ ~~[-F~i~r ~.i Date: _ %~/ ~/ ~u City Staff Use Only Date Reviewed By Slag: 9 ~ Fees: PayaNe to CIry of Rancho Cucamonga in Advance Date Heard by Park & Recreation Omission: ~~ Install 8 Remove: $ Recommended by Commissbn: ~ No AdminlstratWe $ ,, ~~~~7 Date Heard by Cfry Council: 8//990 Preparation $ Council Action: Approved Denied ~d 9 Total $ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Auquat 15, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council r1tUM: Duane A. mazer, Assis2anl lU ii•c ...:.y eia„uye~~~~ SUBJECT: COMTRIBDTIOH TO IDLAND EMPIRE D89IOM IHBTITBTE This last year the inland Empire Design Institute (IEDI) was established as part of the Shaping Groxth in American Communities Project. The Institute x111 serve as a clearing house to provide information to developers, business persons, civic and cultural institutions and private citizens regarding architectural design and planning assistance. The purpose for the formation of the Institute ie to help facilitate quality design for the Inland Empire region. The Institute is now prepared to start up and is eeakinq approxi- mately $50,000 .in start up costs necessary to begin operation. These start uo funds are beiim aouoht from the County. Cities. Measure I, BZA, prominent area developers and the architectural and planning professional associations. of the $50,000 start up costa, the Institute is seeking $10,000 from the County and $10,000 collectively Prom area cities. Thus, a contribution of $1,000 is being requested of Rancho Cucamonga. DAB:tlr DAB:766 30 ~.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: August 15, 1990 To: Mayor antl Members of the City Couna,~l ~ vacK Lam, AICP, Clty Manages ~It FROM: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk SUBJECT: CONSID$RATION TO DBSIGNATB A VOTING RSPASSSNTATIVH AND AN ALTERNATE TO BS PRESENT AT TN6 BUSINESS SESSION OP TNH ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIPORNIA CITES CONPERENC6 ON OCTOBER 23 1990 RECOIN161ID11TION it ie recommended that the city council designate a voting repreeentat ive end an alternate who can be present et the Business Session of the Annual League Conference on October 23. Hackaround/Analvaie This year•e League Annual Conference is scheduled for October 21 - 2d, 1990 in Anaheim, California. At the Bueineae Seeeion, which ie to take place an October 23, at 1:30 p.m., the membership will De taking action on conference reeolut lone which will guide cif See antl the League Ln an effort to improve the quality, reaponsiveneea and vitality of local gavenwent within the State of California. The League ie requesting each City des ignets a voting representative and an alternate to be present at the Bueineae seealon to vote on matters affecting municipal or League policy. if you have any questions, pisses feel free to contact me. /d]a Attached !31 ~.: :~. . ;~~~ League of California Cities ~~ - 1400KSTREET • SACRAMENTO,CA95a14 • (918)4445790 ~~~` cairtwnre cores wax r«~eme. To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Don Benninghoven, Executive Director Rc: Designation of Voting Delegate for Leao.te M11ua1 Dear City Official: Sacramento, CA Iuly 12, 1990 ~~ This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for OMOber 21-24 in Anaheim. One very important aspeM of the Annual Conference is the General Business Session at which time the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual Conference resolutions will guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the qualiTy, responsiveness and vitality of local govetnrttent within this state. All cities should be represented at the Business Session on Tuesday afternoon, October 23, at 1:30 p.m. at the Anaheim Convention Center. the Bucine c Session. The League Constitution provides that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League polity. A voting card will be given to [he city official designated by [he City Council on the enclosed'Woting delegate form." If the Mayor or a member of the City Council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one .n ~- ~.d~_._a _ a._ . .. d.l..."m A... a rbo !`: n, r"n, ril ~i iir~aa. Jfiwi:iu ',:.u w ....o.b ......... ..:......:C:i :e ~~.~y..._. ... ..e.... ~ ..-_ _.y ___n will not have a registered delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these officials should be designated the voting delegate or alternate. Please forward the enclosed "voting delegate form" to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, Seotembet 2S. 1990), so that the proper records may be established for [he Conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the League Registration Area in the Anaheim Convention Center. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. An outline of the voting procedures that will be followed a[ this conference is prinwd on the reverse side of this memo. I[ is suggested that the Mayor and all Council Members from a given city try to sit together at the Business Session so that, if amendments are considered, there may be an opportunity to exchange points of view and arrive at a rnnsensus before the city's vote is cast. Your cooperation in returning the attached "voting delegate form" as soon as possible will be appreciated. ~3~ ., League of California (.}ties is -'~ ~ cac/ttp~ornher city bas a right to ccsi uae vote uu iuaiiars pc~iaiuu~g iu iJeague poLoy: 2. To cast the city's vote a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the Credentalss Committee. 4. The voting delegate or alternate may piclt up the dy+s voting card at the voting delegates' desk in the conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and the alternate is permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same aty by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Onty the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who Gave left a sample of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, [he Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city official to vote at the Business Session. X33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:~fONGA STAFF REPORT August 15, 1990 T0: Mayor, Members of the City Counc ii and City Manager FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: RESIDEIITIpL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Lhat the City Council introduce the accompanying ordinance by reading its title and set the date of September 5 for public hearing on the document. BACKGROUND: On April 18, 1990, the City Council directed that staff prepare a residential fire sprinkler ordinance for submittal to the Public Safety Commission for review and recommendation. On June 5, 1990 and subsequently on June 12, 1990 the Public Safety Comnissi on conducted a public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Public Safety Commission made modifications to ~•~-j__~~ .,a ~.,d oe ~ho• rho_ nnc al ho rnfimnnd Tn the r,i t.V Cou ncil'wi th a recommendation for adoption. The•document before you is the result of the Public Safety Commission deliberations and conclusions. ANALTS IS: The ordinance before you this evening is not for the purpose of conducting a hearing but rather, for setting of a date for hearing before the City Council as required by the government code. In the case of adoption of a nationally recognized code or standard by reference (as is the case here) state law requires two advertisings within a two week period prior to the hearing. The hearing date of September 5, 1990 as recommended will allow sufficient time to meet state noticing requirements. In addition to the ordinance, and to allow fora broader review, we have provided the Public Safety Commission minutes, the report submitted by the Fire District to the Commission and a report on the same subject presented to the Planning Commission in 1986. Re; pRc tfully Sypmi d~ I"/t///i ~/// n~L i ,'die rry .Grant ~Buildin9 Official JG:11 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT '- DATE: June 5, 1990 TO: Chairman dntl MBmbers br the rubiiC safety Commission FROM: L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief SUBJECT: COHSIDHRATIOR OP A RHCOMMStmATIOR TO T~ CITY COONCIL RHGARDING A PROPOSHD RHSOLOTIOR AND ORDINARC6 AMHRDlQ+NTS RHQDIRIMG TRH INSTALLATIOR i - OF ADTOMATIC PIRH SPRI~r.rzrtc IR RBSIDHL~TPIN. I OCCOPAIiCIBS 1 The following staff reports, proposed resolution and ordinance amendments are submitted for your consideration in providing recommendation to the City Council regarding the installation of automatic fire sprinklers in newly constructed single and multi-family dwellings. This matter was originally referred to the Coam:i ssion by the Board/Council. On April 3, 1990, the Commission ~L.T i44~.i it: r... .-.u:~~- - ~V 111C OUd L'Q~1.011n(ill regarding the useV andyy effectiveness of automatic fire sprinklers. On April 18, 1990, the Board/Council (after considering Commission input and the supporting factual information) directed staff and legal counsel to prepare the appropriate legislative documents for Commission consideration and recommendation. Additionally, a public hearing has been advertised in the Daily Report on May 18th and 25th for your June 5, 1990 Commission meeti.nq per Board/Council direction. The Building Official and Fire Marshal have jointly developed the attached reports, findings of fact, resolution and proposed ordinance amendments with appropriate direction from our legal counsel. Respectfully submitted, I /~ L. DeC~hael Pize Chief LDM/Ib Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiYIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June S, 1990 T0: Public Safety Commission FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE wu.uo r ~~ ~~ < > ~,., F'i 4, Iz t97~ RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Pu61ic Safety Commission review the attached proposals, consider any testimony received at the hearing, and make recommend attan to the City Council as to inclusion of additional regulations into the Municipal Code regarding residential fire sprinklers. II. BACKGROUND: At the City Council meeting of April 18, the Council directed staff to Drepa re an ordinance regarding additional requirements for residential fire sprinklers and referred the matter to the Public Safety Commission for review, hearing, and recommendation. The City Attorney has recommended that any provisions in this regard 6e `r~CJf yJfdtcJ inw ~iiq uuiiu iuy reyUia LiUn5, in Gansteerd Llen or a recent Attorney General opinion, and because all other construction regulations in the Muniti pal Code, relating to private property, are administered by the Building and Safety Division. He has further indicated that the fire code, administered by the Fire District, should be revised to eliminate conflicts between the two codes. Since the Bu tiding Cade has been developed to regulate construction and the Fire Code is a maintenance code, the recommendation is valid. Accordingly, the accompanying documenia Lion includes: (a) proposed revisions to the Unf form Building Code (Exhibit "A") that will require installation of fire sprinklers in alt new residential buildings not Dresently designated as requiring them by the publfshed codes; (b) copies of two standards, NFPA 130 and NFPp 13R, (Exhfhit "B"), published by the National Fire Protection AssactaH an (NFPRj, annotated to refl act where changes in the content are proposed; and, (c) an outline of the proposed modifications (Exhibit "C") incorporating a brief explanation of the effects of the proposed changes to the Standards and the reasons for same. /3~ Public Safety Commission June 5, 1990 RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER ORDINANCE Page 2 It is anticipated that when conclusions are reached in the Pvblic Safety Commission deliberations, the NFPA Standards will be rewritten as necessary to incorporate concluded modifications, reformatted to be consistent with already adopted Building Code Standards and presented in ordinance form to the City Council for further consideration. 1II. ANALYSIS: The City's current building regulations include requirements for ins taiiation of fire sprinKlers in individual apartment and condominium buildings containing more than 15 dwelling units or more than two stories in height, and to hotels and motels containing 20 or more guest rooms. The accompanying proposals will expand the sprinkler requirements to all other residential structures, attached garages and carports, and certain other detached accessory buildings. The Standard used for installation of "conventional" sprinkler systems in currently regulated residential buf ldings, Uniform Building code Standard 38-1, is based on a third Standard, {NFPA 13), and is the same as is used for commercial and industrial buildings. The proposed Standards (NFPA Standard 130 and 13R) were developed specifically for rest dentiai occupancies up to four stories in height, contains exceptions for small spaces, attics, and accessory areas, has Less stringent design parameters than NFPA 13 and, in general, is mare specifically oriented to life safety than to property loss reduction. The proposed modifications to Standards NFPA 13D and t3R will, in general, remove many of the exceptions found in the printed Standards. and will add additional limitations, thereby providing a higher level of protection than the original publication. Sprinkler provisions adopted by surrounding Jurisdfctf ons more closely follow the published Standards than those proposed for Rancho Cucamonga, however, most nef ghboring cities vary in their requirements to some extent. Staff will be reviewing differences between Rancho Cucamonga proposed regulations and those of surrounding JuriMiction, in order to develop, to the greatest extent possible, uniformitj with other cities throughout the hest End. A compliation of differences and/or further input will be Drovfded at the Commission meeting. IV. CONCLUSION: The proposals before the Coamissfan are the result of a number of discussions between the Building and Safety Of vision and Fire district staff and represents the ,)Dint efforts of both agencies in carrying out perceived City Council di rectf on. 0.espectfull S~uJb~mitted, F / /'`~ Jerr Grant Buf ding Official JRG/kes ' 3~ it n EX~~b ~t A PROPOSED BUILDSN6 CODE MODIFICATIONS 1. Amend Section 3802 (h) of UBC as follows: (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. qn automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: 1. In every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Oesf gn Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," except that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dweliing unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall be monitored by an approved central station. 2. In all new Group R, Division 1 Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1, above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBL Standard 38-2, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems, in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height." 2. Amend Section 3802 6y addf ng Subsections (i) and (j) as follows: (i) Grouo_R, Division 3 Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkling svstem shall be installed in all new Group R, Division 3 Occupancies. System design and installation shall be conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwell togs and Lodging Houses." (j) Group M. Division ! Occuoarctes. Rn automatic fire sprinkling system shall be installed in all new Group M, Division 1 Occupancies constructed within Len feet (10') of a residential occupancy. EXCEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 391(b) 1 of the Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. Private garages and/or carports attached or accessory to residential buildings may be suDDlied from the system serving the primary use, however, piping and installation within Lhe accessory portions shall 6e in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. 3. Amend Uniform Building Code Standards by adoption of Standards 38-2 and 38-3 (Reformatted and revised NFPA 138 and NFPA 13R). 138 ~i E><~~b~i- "C" Rancho Cucamonga Flre District Installation Standards for Quick Response Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems Per Rancho Cucamonga City Ordinance ??, all residential fire sprinkler installations shall comply with NFPA 13D or NFPA 13R Standards (1989 Editions) with the following revisions: NFPA 13D One- and Two-Famil Dwellin s and Mobile Homes t. Revise 1-~.i.2, "Exception:" to read: Exception: Listing may be waived for tanks, pumps and for hanger as permitted by 3-4.1 only. These items however, must be approved by the Fire District. 2. Revise 1-5.1,4 to read: All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standards. All systems shall be flow tested in accordance with RCFPD Standazds. (The intent of this change is to assort proper lnstallatlon procedures were employed and to give added assurance against future Jallure.) 3. Group R Division 3 Revise Chapter 3 to add a section 3.7 to read: All buildings exceeding 5(100 square feet shall Gave installed with an approved fire department connection (FDC) in accordance with RCFPD Standards. 4. Revise 3.1.1 to delete "Exception (c)" (The lntenr of thlr change fi to assure that the bullding occupant cannot pos- sibly dlsob/e the ryrtem with out dtsabllns domutte water.) 5. Revise 3.6 to delete the Exception, end add: The water flow alarm shall be located on an exterior wall of the master bedroom, such other location, as approved by the Ftre Chief. i i (The intent of de/eting the eucptlan is to osswe that an audible evacuation device is sounded upon sprfnk/er activation. The intent of the M. bedroom flow alarm lacadon fa w backup the smoke detector as an alarm jot the bed- room most likely to be occupied. It is nut the intent of this section to require alarms jot every matter bedroom Ina aing/e 6uUding. /t it the intem of thAr section to allow fleslbiliry in the location requirement so that the alarm is placed !n the best location to alert occupants inside and neighbors, Passerby, «c. outride, of a water flow in case tlu occupantr ae not a7 home ) 6. Revise 4-ti, "Exception 1,2,3,4,5", to read: Exception: Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces, and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. (AII other exceptions are deleted) r O Public Safety Commission Minutes -4- June 5, 1990 olic P ivat r Parka nforcement. Chair stated that since Commissioner Quintana had brought hie issue and she unable to attend tonight, he would like to continue item to the July meet Chairman Boyd wed if there were any members of the rn/fic present for this Ihom ` 1 There was no response. Chairman Boyd stated the re ndat icn was nduct a study on the legality, feasibility and effectiveness he Po11 artment enforcing permit parking violet ions on public school gr e. atated he would like to see an additional recommendation that set a the policy whereby the City could have the School District enforce t parking on school grounds instead of using City Police personnel. ACTION: Item continued to my 3, 1990 m ing. . . • . x E1. Cathy s rd atated it was very hard to access San nardino Roatl from Orang because of the closeneae of parked care to a intersection. She ed Sf there was a way to extend the no packi area by the i [section. eoytl asked the fingineering Department to invest agate the w • • ~ x x P. ADVERTISED PUNLLC HBARZN08 F1. REVIEW OF PA POS DASD N AL A P ANCE Chairman Boyd presented the Dackgrountl information on this item at the Council and Commission level. StaEt report presented by Ch let Michael, Pire Dtetrict, with assistance Dy Jerry Grant, Building Official, Division Chief Almond, Pire District, and Craig Fox, Aae istant City Attorney. Chairman Boyd asked about the proposed chnnge on page 26, section 3-S, to delete the exception that a local water flow alarm was not needed if you had a smoke detector. He asked what was the purpose of the water flow elsrm. DivlaLon Chief Almond, Pire Dietrlct, atated ae the ordinance was developed, a committee was formed made up of people from the Building and Safety Division, the Pire Sataty Division, and the building industry, end stated one of the members of that committee was present to nddrees their questions. I~I Public Safety Commission Agenda -B- June 5, 1990 Tim Fejeran, Fite Prevention Specialist, stated the purpose of the water flow alarm wne to act ae an evacuat Lon device and a back-up to the smoke detector system, and to alert tho neighbors if the owners were not home. Chairman Boyd asked why the alarm was to be located on the outside of the house, and if since oast homes hove the master bedroom in the back, wouldn't that keep the neighbors from hearing the alarm. Tim Fejeran, Pire Prevention Specialist, stated in NPPA 13D and 13R, under 3-a, the appendix states the audible device shall be heard with ell bedroao doors closed and in all bedrooms of the house, eo it was placed on the outside master bedroom wall to be heard by both inside and out aide of the dwelling. Ne stated moat tracts are built back-to-back and would probably echo throughout the area. He stated 'the alarm would be on the master bedroom or cther approved areas, and each tract would be looked at on a case-by-case baste when it came through the planning st ages. There followed a diecueeion on the location of the water flow alarm. chairman Boyd stated on page 29, there Le a proposed deletion of section 4-S, ao would that mean eprlnklere would be required Ln bathrooms. Also by deleting section 2, would sprinklers be required in small closets. Tim Fejeranr Fire Prevention 9pecialiei, stated that is correct. Me stated they have found that moat 6athroame have comDuetiDle plumbing fixtures nne combustibles chemicals under the stake where there have been incidents of fire starting in those locations. Ne ateted they ware also recommending that epclnklers be installed in smell closets because that Se moat often the place vhnro small nFllA~on h1Ao when thano ie w firo Commissioner Yankovich asked if there would just be one alarm required because some residences are very large. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention Special Let, stated it would depend on the structure, and if it meets the requirements for audibility. He stated there may be incidents where two alarms ere required due to the size of the structure. Chairman Boyd opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Commission were: Don Jeckeon, wLlliam Lyon company, stated they just received their package on [hie item and fell they die not hove enough time to prepare, and asked the Commission for a continuance of this item. Bill Ruh, BIA, felt the City should have giant a Copy Of Ghe report to All bu ildere in the City ae a courtesy as he did not receive hie copy until today either. Me ateted he would also feel more comfortable dLscueeinq this issue if Lt could be continued. He then presented information regerdfng Eire eprlnklere from a study conducted 6y Johns Mopklns University and how he felt the coat would impact the homsbuyer. Martin Garrick, Linwln Properties, also naked the Camoiulon to continue the matter dw to the lack oP time to review the staff report. ~~ FuDlic Safety Cammieaion Agenda -6- June 5, 1990 Joe Manieco, attorney for Lewis Nomes, stated he had no complaints with the consents of the staff report, but was concerned with the validity Of the proposed ordimnce. Ne presented information regarding the State Attorney General's opinion on municipalities adopting more stringent codes than the Stnta Fire Narehal, and submitted it for inclusion with the minutes. mh,re ne,..a .,,, f„rr Eer comment. the public hearing was Closed. Chairman Boyd insirucied the Commission on the following points: The Council hoe requested Lhe Commission review the proposed epecificat ions. They specifically did not request the Caamieeion to give them an opinion on whether they approved of the idea or not. Those arguments that tfave Even medw to the Camiuion era made far the purposes of inserting theta into the record. The Ceumiseion's jurisdiction is to decide the leeues based ort the evidence as it is heard and the direction given by the Council. That dlrection le to review the ordinmeee, and to make whatever changes or modifications or other recaamendations ae Lhe Commission feels Se appropriate. The public hearing will be adjourned, end Lf there le fuethar teat imony ae Go changes or modifications, it will be considered at that time. ACTION: The public hearing was continued to Juns 12. 1990 meeting, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers et 10500 Civic Canter Drive, to allow those present mote time to rsyiew the information. s • • • • ~ Chairmen Boyd called a recess at 8:05 p. m. The meeting reconvened et 8:12 p.m. with all members of the conaslesiort preeeni (Quintana absent ~. • R • • • t /~~ Public Safety Commission Minutes -1- June 12, 1990 ' Ron Zeibarth stated that 1e a r¢al problem and did not know if they would able to satisfy everyone's needs. asked what if the public safety aspects are different en the se of vehicles, each ae boat e, camper shells and a moving vehicles. Ron Zei h felt the Commission needed to consider w ,200 citizens feel, end a boat Se properly blocked and stable of a hazard for - c„_ .._ _ _.,____„_ .h..ntd cone ider the boat er'e needs as wall as the-recrea nl vehicle owner's. Chairman Hoyd asked abo amper shells ae a eaEet zatd to children. He et aced it was against the .to leave refrigerator ored outside with doors attached, eo wouldn't a c hell pose the a of hazard. Ron Zeibarth statod temps ells ore no fight eo he did not feel it was the acme issue ae a re rotor. ated Sf a shell was unsecured from the truck, it should bo rsspo ility of the owner to see it fie properly secured. They wanted rc t, but also felt they had certain rights. There being no Eurther comments, the hearing was closed. Chairman Boyd naked Bngineering ate o ras h the tight line visibility for vehicles parked in the front yard a where Can back out onto the street, and what the recomsended set-bn arm to ansu he vehicles ore placed in e safe manner eo ea to not block sidswalka, fi cceaa, sic. Commissioner Glace stated h~uld Like information oat percentage of grade fie considered safe for ei q vehicles on. Commieeloner Yankovich ed he would like information on h o properly secure the tongue of a boat d how beet to store camper shells. Commissioner gu a felt it would De useful to define a specific eubcategorlee he potential hazards Ghat are specific for sac bcategory. ACTION: S to coma back with the aDOVe informatLon, and present i ntion an ordin from other citlea an the same subject, at the August 1990 meet in • R • R R R rman Boyd cal lad a recess at 8t02 p.m. The Commission reconvened at Bt15 with ell members of the Commission present. R 1 R R R R C2. CONTINUATION OF ADVERTISED PUBLIC ,HBAAIN6 ON PROPOSED RBSIDBNTIAL FIA6 Chairmen Boyd re-opened the continued public hearing fray Juns 5, 1990. Addressing the Coamission wags ~~y public 9ntety Coasiaeion Minutes -4- June 12, 1990 Bill Auh fzaa the BIA, 9227 Haven Avenue, who thanked the Commission for the opportunity to coma sack on Dehalf of the BIA. He stated he ores concerned with the ma Lntenance requirements ae listed on page 45. He felt moat residents would not follow the directions because they were too involved. He oleo referred to an article that appeared in the Daily Bulletin on June e, 3990 regnrding planning fee shortfalls, and felt several huildera would not build in the City if this ores passed. He also referred to the north Btiwanda area which ie already paying into a Communities Pacility District for fire orotectl..~. ...~,, ~!. ie -- _.,e t..a ~~,. :.:y :ne Goer or residential fire eprinklere would be very expensive for them. There being no further comnante, the public hearing ores clceed. . .. Coaunaaaaonar .. auu caa aye Gem ores ma sue prove........, o..,. ,. uviy homeowners during response time by the Pire Department. He also felt if a person could afford a $300,000.00 horse, they would want to do something to help protect that home. Cemmiaeionar Curatalo stated the arguments presented only address coat. He Baked if the BIA hoe ever considered if it can save lives. Bill Ruh, BIA, stated that eeverel years ago before he ores with the BIA, ha worked on a system io provide smoke detectors to save lives. Corc~m ieeioner Curata:o felt that smoke detectors would work Ear adults who can flee, but what abour small children. Bill Ruh. BIA, stated he felt ihet hne been looked et. Chairman Boyd stated he would like the Commission to consider the exceptions to the ordinance ae outlined on page 41. He etatad the proposal made in the staff report on page 69 recommends that these exceptions be Belated and substitute with ^eprinklere may be omittetl from attics, crawlepacee, and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes^. Commissioner Weet ores satisfied with the answers provided by the Fire District at the previous meeting. Commieeloner Yankovich etatad hie only concern ores with the exterior elnrm on the maeier bedroom. Chairman Boyd did not feel that sprinklers were needed in small closets and small bathrooms with non-flamwbla fixtures and would like to sea Ezcept ion No. 2 loft in, and possibly issue in Exception No. 1 also. Cortmiuioner Amotlt concurred with Chairman Boyd. •ta~~• Camoieeioner Glees arrived at 7,20 p.m. •~~~~• /~~ public Safety Commission Minutes -5- Juna 12, 1990 Chairman Boyd then referred Lo Section 3-6 on page 38, which the Pire Dietriei was recommending be deleted and replaced with ^in moat building confiquratione, the water flow alarm shall be located on an exterior wall of the master bedroom". Commissioner West felt that might work on smell dwellings, bui wne not sure how it would work on a large house. Commissioner Curetalo felt maybe they could require more than one alarm if square fnntwnw wow lwrow. Chief Michael, Pira District, stated ycu could Snetall ae many alarms ae was felt necessary. He elated the master bedroom would be moat effective because Lt was where adults would De aG night when people were sleeping and could assist with evacuat Lon. Nw wrwron tnwy ..^.,n„ ...~... ~w- ....w..," .,. .. _,. __.... a ~^ •-~ FEW nw=t to equip the homes with alarms. Commissioner Curatalo felt they ehoultl keep the requlremant and add Ln something that aver a certain square footage would have more than one alarm. Tim Fejeran, Fire Prevention Special let, felt the exterior alarm would be for the parents to help in evacuating. He stated it would ba hard to determine a particular square footage requiremani for more than one alarm because the conf igurst ion of houses vaYloue so much. The spec if icat ions stets the alarm muss be audible at night throughout the entire structure with all appliances operating, eo he felt it would be beat to decide at the time the models era built how many alarms would bo required. Chairman Boyd suggested that on page 69, where LL revises Section 3-b, to delete thw wxrwnN nn wad add wnrdlna that anus "water flow alarm) el shell be located on an exterior wall in such a location that it is audible throughout the house ae approved by the Fire Chlaf.^ The Commission concurred. Chairmen Boyd then referred to page 61, Section 2-6, and stated there appeared to be n coneaneue to leave Ln exceptions 1 and 2, delete exceptions 3 and 4 and put in their place the exception noted on page 70, "Sprinklers may be waitted from attics, crawl spaces, and other concealed spaces thst are not used or intended for living purposes or storage", and to keep in except ion 5 on page d2. MOTION[ Moved 6y Amodt, seconded by West to direct the Clty Attorney to develop an ordinance implementing the requirements of 13D and 13R as amended by the Commission, antl to send that ordinance to the City Council for adoption. Motion carried uran Lmously, 6-0-1 (Quintana absent i. MOTIONe Moved by West, seconded by Curntalo that the Commission rscammsntl to the City Council to adopt the findings of feet as shown on pages 76 through S0. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-1 (Quintana absent). /~ 130.1 Copyright C 1989 NFPA, All Rights Rnerve4 NFPA t3D Sf+nd+rd fm fhe Installation of SpriDkler Systems iD One- and Two-Fssmily Dwellings and Mobile Homes This edition of NFPA 13D. Standard far she Imsal/4sion of Sprinkler Syuems in One- and Two-Famt(y Dwellings and Mobile Homes, was prepared by the T«hnical Committ« on Automatic Sprinkler, released by Ws Correlating Committ« on Water Extinguishing Systems, and aped on by the Nauowi Fire Protection Aawciation, Inc. at its Fall Meeting held November 14.17, 1988 in Nuhvilk, Teoness«. It wu issued by the Sunduds Counril on January 13, 1989, with an eflemive date of February 6, 1989, and mperseda all previous editions. 'fhe 1989 edition of mis standard has been approved by the American Nadonal Standards Imtituk. Changes othcr Shan editorial are indinted by • vertical rule is the margin of the pogo on which thry appear. Theo lino arc included as an aid to the user in idntifying changes from the pmious edition. Origla ad DewMpment of NFPA 13D Rrcnanirinv tht neM rn rMUSr rht annual life Inaa fmm fim in miAenti+l mm~wnrira (about 30 percent of tool Ion of life by firs), the Cammitt« oo Automatic 5prinklers appointed a submmmit[ee in May 1973 to prepare a Staodud on the IastUlatioo of Sprinkler Systems in pro and Two-Familyy Dwellings and Mobile Homes. The Subcom- mitt« waa composed of member of the Committ« on Automatic Spookier and other technically compneot experts. The sandard wu submitted and adopted at the Annual , Meeiing io Chicago, IL oo May 1246, 1973, The 1980 edition wu a compine rewrite oC the 1973 edition including St uniu where aDPropriate. The 1980 edition incorpon[ed the rnulu of the residential sprinkler tat program Wmiaivercd by the National Firc Protecioo Association, and funded by ^ research gent from the United Suta Firc Administntion, Factory Mutwl Retearc6 Coryontioo, and me Los Angeles City Firc Department meduned the dwelling tats. Factory Mutwl Reuarch Corporation, McNeary Insunn« Comulting Servim and the Charlotte, North Caroliw Fim Department mnduned the mobile home tnu. After gaining ptamical experience with the 1980 edition, modi8atiom to the sundud, including removal of design pamm~en for dry-pipe systems, were made in the 1984 edition. 7ht 19$9 edition presides Cot the rerognitinn oC antifrcexs systems. nn updstt en the me losses m one- ana two-iamuy dwellings, and otter new gurdae« for pmmomng of residential sprinkler oo sloped and beamed ttilings. Requircmrnts have alw been provided for the insuilation of residential sprinkler in high-tempenturc areas. /~ / nw a«a.~ 130.3 Akenmue Rqn L AIIM. Anon Murwl Rerwck Corp. (Alumni ro W. E. Nikon) Dos L Der. Dov CbmiN Co. gltmum m 1. L. De0.av1 Towq E. EnEYM.IV,lurtnrl Rirk luurtn phewu ro K W. Lvderl Dr.M D. Enmr, Cevtn fm Flrt pmearch Wurene m W. D, WWOW Rreeell P, fYaly, Nul. Fin Sprivklrr Aun. ^.: a; rlrw0.n E Lwwkk, trndervritm Lehwerorin Iric IAltervne b L J. DmeAk) EJwrd L GWrE. Vndennun Lekonuriu of Crm ear fAlterwk b 0.. !. Wryhq ., •MmL Xrron Corp. IAluneu m D. M. Yalu) 0.e/snC D. MrEw, Amenru Firt SpriWrkr Awc. (Aluneu b L J. Grey) J. L MskYkry, NW. RrrnrvL CouvWl IAlrrrvru m 1. K Richudmnl M~rrn M. MeawLL Muwell Q LeBmov A.rthiune (Alu:vu ro J. c. O'NeJll Rveb J. MlLloskk. Emma KaNk Co. wrewre n e. 1. smiekm:m) JauFk c. NweY, s. PeuCmr Firt Depv IAlmwb b E. C, Eemnl O~W W.O'Remb.SMirmrr Eepe«riy COrp. INiwYn b C. W, $rAi(mrr) Jrr RrRY4 Tke Yikiy Cmp. Wura.. ra .:. errmro HmTSAo-,lm1 Axm NF+rt ChiNe (Alurmu ro W. Drvk Hllbo) Jtl'r~W, AWe Aunmmk SprieWU Co. (AxnroHe m L ]'mmermevvl ]rY SbIMmE The Skmrw Cmp. IAHnutr b T. 0. Drtyl J,Mr i. Vby NFP Sprivkln, le<, (AIW Vn w W. TempYO) wuE~ A wwL RarJrwn n Aemrbw lm. (Alumni m R. H. Jemm) NMMh~ E4M L RWkL NuEMe Arue. WNIS 6. Re44 RoEel Auoc Rep Commilue ov 9efeey ro Life MW M. Lrr, WmmW Fin Syxsou SnlrommlNte on Araktvthl OtLVpRVCk3 JrkR G.O'IVA, Qtlrmu n....pa...k A r....:.... r.. E,I,rW L Rdrk1. NvEku Auae. lgerY L CegML PtlleElr Amomelle Sprinkler Co. Im. Juew L DrwYeE. NNL ANP. of Nome EuJhn RkkrrJ [. HeBkq, LSO Commenul Rikk 9mim RYPk JrYUa AIWU lervrean Co. NrkyCkrl [r1, Frvlary MmuJ RrrrvB Cmp. Gmr~ L L~,nrleLL VvOUwriun Lrborumia Is, RaMr E. 9wkuq NFM SuE Liuwn Orrle Lr.MM4 MuyWC Fin EgWpmnt Corpo- nebv J. L tkkkr4rR. Fin Reernrr4 Couodl of CuWn Nrrr 91w, Intl. Aem. of Fin Chiefl J. Tem SeYIL VS Fnr AdmipWkrlon wHkem L'hy Grinvell Firt Prvlectmv Syueme [o. Im, WRtlem TYrr, Rempu croup WIIEr A Wrkk, Rolf leeeev k04 Mex. Im. Thu Iw nJmm~4 ihr memMrrAip u rM nmr rM Commrnn war Ea//alad vn rM rrxt a/thlr edition. Jin<e rMr nmr rMryn :n rM mrmMnArp maY Fare arvrmnd NOTE: MrmhrNip ov • Comminn rkYl en in reC of iredf mmunu rn eigonemeer of 0e Auonniov m uy Earvneer deMOped ley Nr Commirrm ov whkh rtr memker eervu. 1 ~8 Nk.lae~ GE~ERnL IPFORNniION 13D-5 NFPA UD Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family' Dwellings and Mobile Homes 1989 Edition NOTICE. An avensk l-lfollowingshcnumberorletterdengnas- ..~r-. • .. . v M1.- ~4vx~e1.`.a%x _ _ _ _ _ _ Information on re(ercnced publications can be found in Chapter ' and Appendix B, Prelate h is intended that this standard provide a method (or thou individuals wsshing w install a sprinkler system for additional li@ safety and properly protection. h is not the purpou of this standard to rcquirc the installation of an automatic sprinkler svsrem. This standard auumes that one or more smoke detectors will be installed in accordance with VFPA 1q, Standard fur the lmral(arian. .Hamrenartce. and Ilse ol'HOUSeho/d Fire nhrnmg Equspmenr Chapter 1 Genml Ioformation 1-I' Scope. Thn standarC deals with the design and in- stallation of automatic sprinkler systems far protection against the fire hazards in one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes. 1-!• Purpose. Th<purpou a(9his standard is to providca sprinkler sysem that will aid in the detection and control of residential fires and thus provide improved protection against injury. hfe loss, and property damage. A sprinkler system installed in accordentt with this standard is eapecP ed to prevent flashover point involvcmenq in the room of fir<origin. when sprinklercd. and to improve the chance for occupants to escape or be evacuated. Guidelines are established for the design and installation of sprinkler systems for one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes. Nothing in this standard is intended to restrict new «chnologia or alternate armngem<nn provid- ing the ievei oP safety prescribed by she aandard is nnr lowered. 1-J• Definitions. .4pprmed. Acceptable to the "authority havingjurisdic- hon." NOTE', The Nananal Fire Protection Associanon does not approve, inspeet or randy any msWluions, procedure, egmpmenL or mat<nW nor does n approve or evalwm ieung labontone. In determining tae accepsabililY of installations or prottdum. equipment or mnenoh, the awhony saving lunsdKlson mry base accepume on com- ~~q phann wish NFP.4 or other appropriate Nandards In the abxntt of such standards. said authority may rcquirc n'o dance of propennstallatian, proceeure or ux. The aarhorisy baring iunsdscuon may alw rtfer so the hsungs or labeling pncum of an osgamzaoon conttmcd wnh produn cvaloa- sions winch Is in a position so determine compliance woh appmpnam standards for she current produnion of lisird i¢ms. Authority Havioa Jurisdieioa. The "authority having junsdicuon" is the organszauon. ofhce or mAO'idual re- sponsible for "approving" equipment, an insallation or a proceaure. VOTE: The phase authority hasinglunsdinion''IS Uxd in NF'PA documenu in a broad manner since Ivrisdicnons Wher<pubbe safety rs primary. the °aushonry hanngluns- diaion" may Ue a federal, ssax, local or other regmnal depanm<m or indmduL such e a fire chief. fire marshal. chief o(a fire pmention bureau, labor department, heahh depanmens. building oesciai, elttWcal impactor, or others having statutory authority. For insurantt purposes. an Insur- ance inspecison depanmens, nsin6 bureau, or omer Imur- antt company repreunutive may be the "authority having jurisdielon," In many dreumsUnces the properly omer or his dnignated agent astume the role of the "authority having junsdinion'"; as governmrnt insWluions. she com- mandin{ ofiar or departmental oNcial may b the "author- ity having jurisdiction." Check Vdre. A valve which allows flow in one direction only'. Control Valre.• A valve employed to control Ishutl a supply of warcr m a sprinkler system. rws.. nt..a.... o,.. ,.n.,.., e~..b.....e i.,..,. ,,,. matic sprinkler expresud in gallons per minute. Dry System. A system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing air under atmos- pheric or higher pressures. Loss of pressure from the open- ing of asprinkler ordetection of afire condition causes the releau o(water into the piping system and out the opened sprinkler. Dwealq. Any building which contains not more than one or two "dwelling units" intended to be uud, rented. leaud, let or hired out to be occupied, or which are occupied for habiution purpous. Dtrelliq Uolt. One or more rooms arranged for the use of one or more individuals living together as in a single hauukttpmg unit, normally having cookin8. hying, sani- tan, and sleeping facilitiei. LahelN, Equipment or materials to which has been attached a label, symbol or other identifying mark of an organization acsepmbl< to the "authority having jurisdic- tion" and rnncemed with product evaluation, that mam• taim periodic inspection of produttion of labeled <qmp- mem or materials and by whoa labeling the manu(acturcr indicates mmpliantt with appropriate standards or pertor- mantt in a spetifled manner. Gatti. Equipment or me«rials mduded in a list puh- IiShed by an organization acceptable to the "authunq I,n ea,a,~ 4'nTE0. SL PPIY 5\STEN CONR1~EVa 170.7 Chapter 2 W'ner SuDPIY 2-1 Geoenl Prariskm. Even automatic sprinkler system shall have at least one automatic water supply. When stored water is used az the sole source of supply, the minimum quantity shall equal the water demand rate times 10 min- uets. ISee 4-/ J.1 r_2• aqy... c .-.;. :~~. (ni;c4ing uamr suypiy sources are acceptable:~N la) .4 ^_.... ._.^. (^ 3 rG:2blf wa!f{ wnrk5'_V5t[^: (b) An elevated tank. Ic) A pressure tank installed in accordance with NFP4 i i bn~dnrd tnr rhr /nvallatinn oLSnrmkler Svsfems. and VFP4 2?. Standard for Khter Tanks (or Private Fue Yrotea (ton, (d) A stored water source with an automatically operated pump. 2-3' Malti(rurpox P{ping System. A piping system serv- ing both sprinkler and domestic needs shall 6e acceptable when: lap In common water supply connections serving more than on<dwdling unit. 5 gpm 119 Umin1 is added to m< sprinkler svstem demand to determine me size of common piping and the size o(the total water supply rnquirtmenes. (b1 Smoke detectors arc provided in accordantt with VFPA 74. Standard far the /ntrallation, sfamtenonce. and Lke nl Household Fire Warnm¢ Equipment. (cl All piping in the system conforms to the piping specifications of this standard. Idl Permuted by the local plumbing or health authority. 2d Nobik Home Water Sapply. A water supply for a sprinklered dwelling manufactured otT-site shall not b< leu than that specified on the manufacturer's nameplase. [See 4~4 i'kr E.rrepnon.) Chapter J System Components }I Vdrn and Dnim. }I.t Each system shall have a single control valve ar- ranged to shut oR both the domestic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shutoR valve for the domestic system only. E.rreprinn :Va. l: The sprinkler ryaem ptpmg mar have a teparate cannot valve where superv(sed by one of the Jollow~ mg methods: !~i ! rnnni tlannn, pmnne(nn', n remora yd(rnn niarm ternre, tbl Laal alarm service that wit! cause the sounding of an audible signal at a constantly a(tended point m lrl Laking the valuer open. Ezrepnon .Vo. 1: Aseparate thutpwa/ve is not required for the domettir water rupply in multipurpose piping systems. YLT Each sprinkler system shall have • W in (13 mml or larger drain and Left connection with valve on the system side of the control valve. }LJ Additional drains shall be installed for each trapped portion of a dry system which is subjen to freezing amper- atures. }E Pressure Gaga. }T.1 .4 pressure gage shall be insmiled to indicate air pressure on dry systems and on water supply pressure tanks, i-i Dip:ng }J.1 Pipc or tube used in sprinkler systems shallbeo(Ihe materials in Table 3-3.1 or in accordance with J-7.2 through 3-7.>. The cnemicai properties, physical properties, and dimensions o(Ihe materials listed in Table 3-7.1 shall 6e at leaf equivalem to the standards tired in the able and designed to withstand a working pressure of not less than i:~WrtiL, .. r Tdk }l.l Maledak vat Dlmemievs SrandW I Specifi<auon (or Welded and Seamless Smel Pipe 45TH .45J WroughPSteel Pipe AVSI B3n.lOM Spttificatiam for Elettnc-Resistance Welded Stal Pipe ASTM A: JS Copper Ttibe )Drawn. Seamless) Specification !or Seamless Copper Tube ASTM BTS Spaification for Seamless Copper Water Tube 45TH 868 Sprifintier. for Cxnersl RequL•cmems (or Wrought Seamless Copper and Copper-Alby Tube 4STM 8251 Busing Filler Metsl ICiassification PCUP.r nr nfu P-ds 4WS A56 Specification (or Solder Metal, 95.5 (Tin-Antimony-0nde 95TA1 4STM BR }3.2 Other types of pipe or tube may be used, but only those investigated and listed for this service by a testing and inspection agency laboratory. 1J.3 When<v<r the word pipe is used in this standard, it shall be understood to also mean tube. }3.1 Schedule 10 steel pipe may bej~ined with mechani- cal groove couplings approved (or service with Broovcs rolled on rho pipe by an approved groove rolling machine. }l.5 Fissings uxd in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials listed in 7sMe ?-?._< er in acrordantt with ?-?.7. The chemscal propeties, pnyvcal properties, aria aimen- sions of the materials listed in Table l-J.S shall be at least equivalent to the standards cited in the table Fittings used in sprinkler systems shall be designed m withstand the working prcaurcs involved, bus not leis than 175 qi (i 2.1 ban) cold water prcuure. }J.d Joints for the connection of copper tube shall be brazed. Exception: Salderedjoints (ql-S solder mem11 maybe used for wet-pipe rapper ruby sprremr. I ~ ~ iw taroan STSIEM pF51G\ IJD-9 41.4 Sprinkler Coverage. 41.4.1 Residential sprinklers shall be spaced sa that the maximum area Drotccted by a single sprinkler does not extted I J4 sq ft (13A m°). 41.4.2 The maximum dissantt between sprinklers shall not exceed 12 ft pJ ml on or between pipelines and the maximum distance to a wall or partition shall not exceed G ft 11.8 ml. The minimum distance between sprinklers w nNn a cumparsmem >nali be 6 it i-.J wi. 41 < The minimum operating pressure of am sprinkler shall be in accordance with the listing information of the sprinkler and provide the minimum flow rotes specified in 41.1. 41.6 Application rates, design areaz. areaz of coverage. and minimum design pressures other than thou specified in 4-L 1. J-1.2. 4-i.b. and 4L5 may be uud with special >prinkkrs which have been listed for such specific residen- tial installation conditions. 42 Position of Sprinklen. 42.1 Pendent and upright sprinklers shall be positioned so that the d<Oectors are within 1 to 4 in. (25.4 to 102 mm) from the ceiling. Esreptrun: Spenmf residemral sprinklers shell be inslafled m amorddnce avrh the fisting hmim(ions. 42.2 5idewall sprinklers shall be pnition<d so that the deflectors are within 4 so 6 in. 1702 to 152 mm) from the cehng. E.arepnnn: Special resldenriel sprinklers rhaG be rnsrelled m acrordanre aslh the listing /imimrianr. 42.7' Sprinklers shall be positioned sn Ihai the roponx tim<and discharge are not unduly effected by obstructions such as :ailing slope. beams, or light fixtures. 43 System Typo. 43.1 W'et-Pipe Syatema. A wet-pipe system shall 6e uud when all piping is innalt<d in areaz not subject to frcezirg. 43.2 Dry-Pipe Systems. Where svssem piping is located in unheated areas subject to freezing, adry-pipe or anti- fr<ex<system shall be used. F.arepnon: Gsred nandard dry-pendent or dry ndewall sprinklers may be exunded rota unheated areas nor intended %nr living purposes. 43.7 AnNfreeu Systems. ¢i.17 DaHgitbq. An anti(rceze system is one emplnyina autpmasit sprinklers anachcd to a psping sysrcm comaining an antifreeze s0lwion anO connected so a water supply. The nmiGttz< solwion, followed by water, diuhargm immedi- ately from spnnklers opened by a fire. 4).J.Y Wham Uaed. The ux of antifreeze solutions shall be in conformity with any state or local health regulations. ¢37.) Aostheeza Solatka4 47.7.7.3 When sprinkler systems are supplied by public water connections the ux of antifreeze solution other than /51 water solutions of port glycerine 1C.P, or 115. P. 94.5 percent grade) or propylene glycol shall not be permmed. Sui[able glycerine-water and propylene glycol-water mn- turcs are shown in Table 4-3.3.3.1. Table 47.7.7.1 AnNfneu SukHsms m be L'ud if Puolk Water b COanMe4 to Spriokkn apenne ereezlga Solmka Grniry N Poiat Matedm (by 1'olvmel 40'F 119.6'CJ 'F 'C Glycerine 50%W'ata L133 -IS -26.1 C.P, or U.S.P. Grade' 40% Waser LI51 - - 70.0 30?b Water 1.165 -40 -40.0 Hvdremeur Scale 1.000 ro L200 Propylene Glycol 70% Water 1 0?' ~ 9 - L'.9 60%Water 1.034 - 6 ->_LI 509e Waser 1.041 -76 -77_> 40%Weser 1,045 -60 -51,1 Hydrometer Scale 1.000 to L-OO ISUbdivislon s 0.00'_1 CP ~'hemiNly Purc. U 9.P-Untied sores PMmarop«u 96.5% 43.37.2 If public water is not connected to sprinklers, the commercially available materials indicated in Table 43.3.3.2 are suitable for ux in antifreeze solutions. 43.777• An anlitrttze solution shall be prepared wish a freezing point below the expected minimum temperature for the locality. The speci& gravity of the prepared solution shall be checked by a hydrometer with suitable xale. LNe 4777.2 Antitreeu Soklbnr to be Cud i/ Aklk Wner 0 nor Coggeayed tq Spdekkn 5paiflc Frmiaa Soknon Gravity m PWnt Mata1N IM VWUne) a0'F (13.6•CI 'F 'C Glyttdoe If glycerine is uud, sin Table 47.7.3.1 Dimhylene Glycol 50%Wamr L078 -IJ -15A d5%Water 1.081 -27 -72.8 JO%Wmer L086 -41 -41,1 Hydromeer Scale L000 m 1.120 15ubdivuipns 0.0021 Ethylene Glycol 61%Waser 1.036 -10 -2J.J S6%Water 1,067 -20 -29.9 51% Water 1.069 - 70 - 74.4 a7%Waser 1.077 -4U -40,0 HyC;omHer &ak :,000 to !.l>-O ;Sundivisicm 0^021 PropYkne GlYCOI If propykx alyml s uud. see Tank aJ J. ).I Gkium Chloride !b CaCI~ per 80%"Flake" gal of Wmer Eire Proration Grade 2.87 LI8) 0 -It.B Add mrrodom inhibitor 1.78 1112 - 10 - ZJJ of sodium bichromale 7.89 1137 - 20 - 28.9 vt of per gN wirer 4.77 1.248 - 70 - 71,4 1.73 1171 -b -10,0 1.91 L28J -50 -43.6 'Fro from myxrwn chbnde and aher Imlwnun sr»tenm 51'tTEN Df51GY rOV-11 Tabk N.JIb) Prenme Losses Ipsi/hl Copper iubiog-TYpn g. 4 Q M. C = 150 Flow hate -GPM Tubioa Type Siu in. 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 b JS 40 35 50 , N 0.08 0.12 O.Ifi 0.20 0.25 0.70 046 0.64 V.85 - - - L 0.10 0.14 0.18 0.]3 0.29 0.35 0.<3 0 r5 LW - - - K 0.13 0,18 0,24 D.JO 0.18 0.46 0.69 0.97 L28 - - - I M 0.02 0.03 0,03 0.06 o.e7 O.UB 013 0.18 0.:4 0.30 O.IA 0.46 L UUt VW VUS LLUO U.VE V.IU U.li V1V U2] U.75 U.4) UJi K 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.07 0,09 0.11 OI] 0.24 0.31 0.40 0.50 0.61 „ M nnl nnl Ong nn2 nOl 001 not OOT 0.09 011 015 0.1] L 001 0.01 0,02 0.02 0.03 0.0? 0.05 0.07 0.10 O.i2 0.16 0.19 K 0.01 O.OI 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0,06 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.17 0.]0 I'e M - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 008 L - 0.01 OOI 0.01 D.DI 0,01 0,02 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.0] 0.08 K - 0.01 0,01 0.01 0.01 0.02 002 O.U3 O.US U.W u.0] U.W _ M _ _ _ _ _ - 001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.0_ 0.0: L _ _ _ _ _ - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 p,02 0.0'_ K _ _ _ _ _ - 0.01 0.01 0.01 0,01 0,02 U.0_' For 51 Vmu'. I gal. • 3.85 L. I ql - 0,0689 fiar. I R ~ 0.3038 m. Lbk 1-I.J(tl FquNeot Lesgth of %pe in FeH for Sgsel W Copper Fitlirp W KlYea Elton Tees Vahn Fi1HOa/711Ye Fbw Floe GbM Die eter M Tbn thn "Y" lo UeRees UePea eI k Blaarh Ran Gne Aqk Globe Atten Cak CMeh 4. 1 2 I 4 I I l0 21 I I 3 ) 1 I 3 5 I 12 28 IS 3 3 I;: 2 7 6 2 IS 35 la 1'h 2 4 7 8 3 2 IB 17 72 6 6 2 3 S 7 10 l 2 24 57 28 7 8 o..M n^ r-r•r TrAnl..l 0..rr Nn 11 n For 51 Vntu'. I R • O. JOIE m. IThn n bout upon IM fnctwn Iw 16rmyh gb< fituea Moo lotepmecnl of IM C floor avmhMx la the pipma) (k7 The remaining piping shall be sized the same as the 4-0.1 To siu piping for systems with an elevated tank. piping to the farthest sprinkler unleu smaller sins arc pump, or pump-tank combination, determine th< pressure justifi<d by calculations. at the water supply outlet and proceed through steps (ck tel. Exrepuon; For sprirtk/ered dwellings menujermred olj--nee. (g). ih). (i), (j), and (k) of a-4.J. the minimum pressure needrd to satisfy the ryttem design rritenton the system side ofthe mere shall betpecifiedont 4-S Plpieg Coaflgantbaa. Piping configuntians may be dam plate by the manufacturer. (See Senion 1d.) looped. gddded, straight run, or combinations thereof. 4-b l.totkw of Sprinkkn. Spnnklers shall be installed in Tahk N.J(p 811 anat. Prsaam Lmaaa hW~b Mmn Exception No. 1. Sprinkers may be omitted Jrom beth- pgalgR Len gpgp rooms nor exceeding i5 sq ft /5.1 m'J with noncembusnble Meter FIowIP) plumbingfzcewes tlnrbnl 10 73 26 31 34 32 Exnprion Na 1: Sprinklers mtY be omUted Jrom small ss 9 13 le 26 clouts where the lent dimension dart not exceed 3 ft 10.9 m/ I Nx 2 i i le 6 I O and the ores does not exceed 14 sq ft (1.1 m'1 and the wells Iyl •• I 2 2 q 7 2 ] •• •• •• and rtil(nnggs are surfaced with nonromburtible or bmrtrd romburtiMe metrrialt at deJulyd by NEPA 110. Standard on 2 I ryas of Building Conslrucfion. NOTE: Hlpller pnnun bus Ipec1EM by Hw maaufr4um Ibmtt be uud m pku of twee fpmiMd io IM uGe. Lonsr prtnum Ieilr/ may M ales £xrrprfon No. 3.' Sprinklers mtY be Omttttd from gerpget. Faxll Wpparllllt tan 11 pnYites q' nN Ipe1p mOYtR YI[r. • AMu maimum nut Oow of sommowy mikMe gaHtn oplrt etlerhed pOMllet, COIpOrlt, end xmt/er fenrfnret ••gIn atom I pu. For sl G4fu: I ppm • )au Gmm. 1 in. - 25~I mm. E.ttepnon No. 4: Sprinklers may be umrtlcd from wnl r /~V IM IOVn BWroom * Ien~4an C CM1nr Q $pnnMler B B!e ~ Curbms HB Heatl Bwrtl D Oresur N N~gln Sbntl CN CM1eft L lxnP for St Umu: 1 In • 31 A mm FfEme A-1- IUI Ee4mm. L~mnyomn APPEVOI%A /~ MOEiIt HOm! B1CIOmn N 13D-13 nlelaen, 3-bole C-Cnur E •EM TeWe CV!-Curwro L - Lemm Q • bPflnklH For bl Vei¢ I ie. • 3fA mm. i Ignnion Q bprinklw CW Curolw 0 firmer C Chei. 8 Bb Fot 51 Uniu~. 1 in. • 35.1 mm. Fyme A-1-IIYI MoNk Home Babeom. nrrrpoit n A-Id System control valves should be of the indicating type. such as plug salves. ball valves. butterfly valves. or O.S. & T. gate valves. A-1-0 l'heresponsrbilityforproperlymainsainmgaspnn- kler system is the oldigation of the owner or manager who should understand the sprinkler system operation. A mini- mum momhly maintenance program should include the followrng~ lal \'isualh inspect all spnnklers to ensure against ob- arucnon ofspray. 161 Inspect all valves to assure that ther arc open. fcl Test all water!low devices. Idl The alarm system, if installed, should 6< Tested. ]UTE~. When n appears 6aely than she mss udl result in a r<sponx of the fire department. nonficauon to the fire departmen should M matle prior to the cert. Tel Pumps. where employed. should be operated. ISee A'FP.9 '0. Standard for (he /nsrallarion of Crntrl(uga! Fire Almps,l I() The pressure o(air used with dry systems should be checked, (g) Water 1<•'el rn tanks should b< checked. Ih) Care should be taken to tie that sprinklers are not painted either at the time of installation or during subx- quent redecoration. When painting sprinkler piping or painting m areas neat to sprinklers, the sprinklers may be protected b} covering with a bag which should De removed im medtas<iy after paining has been finished. pl For further information xe V FPA 13A. Rerammend- ed Prarnre (or the lmper(ian. Temng and .Namtenanre of Spnnkler.Spslems. A-1-5.1.1 At least three spare sprinklers of each type. temperature rating, and onfice size used in the system should be kept on the premius. When (uud sprinklers are replaced by the owner, fire department, or othen, care should be taken to assure that the replacement sprinkler has the same operating characteristic. .A-1-5.1.4 Testing of a system can be accomplished by filling the stem wnh water and chttking visually for leakage al each )Dint or coupling. Fire department connationnarc not required for systems covered by this standard. but may be installed at the discretion of the owner. In thex caxs hydrostatic tests in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the lrurallanan of Sprinkler Srsrems, are r<quirtd. Dry systems should also be tested by placing she system ^nd!! 3tt pmgSnrG 4ny flak !b4t rcan!(s in a dr~p.R Syetem pressure greater than 1 psi 10.14 bar) in 24 houn should be corrected. Check for leaks using soapy water brushed on each jolni or coupling. Leaks will bt shown 6y the preunce of bubbles. This test should be made prior to concealing of piping. A•2.2 Connection for fire protenion to city mains is often subject to local re{ulation ronttmin{ mtterin{ end luck- gow prevention rcquircments. Preferred and acceptable water supply arran{ements are shown in Figures A-2-2(a), (blr and (c). When a meter mint be used between the city -Gty Warer Mair euv Gax Grv Gate verve va:ve envoi vane •Rohher Fxed i0vnon Water Cnxk valve gele•ence J~: 1 Metes Ea<epaon Np 11 Pressure Gage I Domesr~c snuoal I Wiser Fipw I -~_" verve Oran one Tmt Detxmr I Connxnon Pressure Gage To Ampnanc To Domestic sonnxier 1 ~ sv vein Sv+tem Fiaare A-2-2fa1 Acnptnbk Amngemenr. Moir coy Gate Vawe Warer F~.pw Water Detector SPnnkler Meter Pressure Gage \ Gorvo~ Valve Maur. Connor ~ IOpnpn RePoren<e /vnp¢ momau. ~ s ~ ~ - a"-r mesnc Soren Fier SUtem No ~ti r svsmm L Dcmev c Pres1uie Gage Snut-nn Ormn and Tut VBVe Connxnon 'Runherexed Chxk Va.e •quhEer FxeU Cnxx Vemo Opnonn Flaene A-3•ilel AasepaNe Artanarmenl. I3D-IS Water Main f,_.an cote vane ro Dpm.em< ~ $VSflm Main Contrp~/L Ve'.v¢ OOmnSt'C ware e ._ r sour-mr Cnxk vas-ve^ I Pressure Gage vv°¢ Winer P ow Drag and Tess Oerec mr Connenon Pressure Gage To Aummatm $Or'nkler System FI{prc .>-2-2p1 Prcfmak Artnnaemem. /S~ ron ror.P ePPE~DIx 1 13D-I'1 n~nem o.+.m ' naom~ Min 6~n -IZOSnmI~ i L.,,.I '~ ~^7 M~ L~nw / i Nell onm ~-~ `^°n noom Pn~ Figure A+L0fv1 Sprinkler Design .areas (a TYPital Residential Gtt9paney. o~n,ne xmuMc Nmn, ~~~~ in roman lm~ w~ Mn 6n.IM3mmIMW / gym/ ,, / ew MeT/ ~ nor Rwm' /~/i ~~- Figvrt A+LE(bl $luinkler Design Area fa Typinl RnldndH UCCYPNCy. performance. The t<sung was limited to one pendent-type ., .~ .,,.. _. ., ..._..a:_.. .i.._.. ,n ...e n u. •y....n..• ... degr<esl. and two beam configurations on the single enclo- sure size, In order to judge the eRecliveness of sprinklers in controlling fires, two bau line tesD, in whim th<ceiling was smooth and horizontal. were conducted with the pendent spnnklers installed and wuh a total water supply o(26 gpm 198 L/mint as required by VFPA 13D. The resuhs of the base Ilne tests were compared with tats in which the ceiling was beamed and/or sloped and two pendent sprinklers were installed with the same water supply. Under the limited condiuons ttstcd, the comparison indicates That sloped and/or beamed ceilings r<preum a uriaus challenge to the fire protection afforded by fast mponu residential sprin- klers. However, further tests with tamed ceilings indicated that fire control equivalent to That obtained in the bau line msu may b< obtained if one sprinkler is centered in each 6av formed by the beams and a Total water supply o(J6 gpm 1176 Umml is available. Fire control equivalent to that nMaintd in the haseiine tests was obtained for the smooth sloped ceiling tells when three sprinklers were installed wnh a total water supply o(54 gpm (200 Umin). In a single smoldenng•started fire test. the fire was suppresud,' A-.4JJ.i Antifreeze solutions mry be used for maintain• ing automane sprinkler protection m small unheated areas. ' ERecn o! Cathedral and Beamed Cmlin6 Comtrunion on Rnld<mml $pnnkler Per(ormantt. FMRC 1.1, MJN3,RA111. by Bdl lr, R.G ;Kung. N4:: Brown. W.R.: and Hill. E.. prepared (or U.S. Flrc Adminisvatmn IFeb. 1988. Lbk A+3.7 Muimum Diauaw from $prlnkkr DeBenor to Botom o(Celllug Obatrodbo Muimum Dlftante rrom spdnkler Deflrnnr Distmge from $priokler to Bottom of to $Ide of Ceiling OMtroalon Cellivg (1Dstruttion Less ttlan 6 In. ]'ot permnted 6 in. to less than I h 0 m. iniui~.:m;~_nbin. ~~~. it b In. m less roan 3 it J 3 C to leu than J h b In. Y In. J ft 6 in. to less than 4 ft 6 In. Y R to less than d R b m. ' In Y h 6 in. to less than 5 (s 9 1n. s n to less than 5 it b m. I l m 5 ft 6 In. w ices than b ft ~: m For 53 Cmu' I m. • 05A mm: I fl • OJOdB m I Nos to Eaceee Mav mum Cei ng pe.mmatl Oee Y-2 1 d Obsnucnon d 201 fya% I ~/ Maa~mum Dmenre Deliector Above Botom of ..- -,Obs•u..~n- I Ol Ceiling Obsvucnon ' ::a... :. ' ........ I.ootM• Abme Bottom of Celllat rNanxdas.~~t ' Antifreeze solutions are recommended Doty for systems nos exceeding 60 gallons (151 LI. Becauu of the cost of refilling the system or replenishing small leaks, it is advisable :o uu small dry valves where more than 40 gallons (151 L) are to be supplied. Propylene glycol or other suitable matenal may be used as a substitute for priming water, to Drev<nt evaporation of the priming Buid, and thus reduce ice formation within the system. A~•J.JJ.J Beyond certain limits, incrcarcd proportion of antifreeze does not lower the freezing point of soluDOn. ISee Figure A-4.333.1.) Glycerine, dielhylene glycol. ethylene glycoh and propylene glycol should never be uud without mu~ng wtth watts !n proper proportions, htrauv three materials tend to thicken near 32'F (0'CI. A1J.J.1 To avoid leakage, the materials and workman• ship should be <xccllent, the threads clean and sharp, and the joints tight. Ux only metal faced valves. A-4J.J.! Tests should be made bydrewinga sample o(the solution from valve B two or three times during the freezing usson, especially if it has been necessary to drain the building sprinkler system far rcpain. changes, etc. A small hydrometer should be uud so that a small sample will he /~~ iwa ewm I~DE% Appendi<B Refercllttd Pohlintioos &1 The following documents or portions thermf are referenced within thit standard for ioforma)lonal purposes onl) and thus arc not considered pan of the requirements of Ihis document. The edition indicated for each reference is the current edition as of the date of the ~'FPA issuance of this document. o-r.l TrrA ruolryannns. .lallonal rlre YrotMtlOn Atto- ciaE:D.^., fleJteryma :h Pa: k. Q::ie.-i.:.fA 0:'_69. NFP,4 I3-19&9. Sandard for the Insta//atron o(Sprmkler Systems YFP.4 13.4-1987, Recommended Pra¢uce for the /rtspec- nun, 7esttng and .5lamtenanre o/Sprinkler S,esrems tiFPA 13R•1989. Standard (or the lnsrallarion a(Spnn- kler S,rstems in R¢mdenual Grcupan¢ies up to Four Scones Irt Ne+ght \FPA 20.7987. Standard (or the /ntla(/afion u(Cennifu- galFire Pumps \FPA ii-IY89. S(andara for me /nttaf(atron, .Vamte- naeye, mN Lir f Nmurhoid ~Firr i{a.ning Equrpmenr. lain C 1989 ylu~wul nrt Pmmemon AauSwgn, all nsllu reserved iMCnp1'M1PM in tllif mdea ufeparue alM OininnlrglllM<Oprrlhlll In rll[ducumenl vnlmuilld[a[f rM IKMYnh plOYngln fe[(Mh(p rile Qltlmrnrar[ a applinblc In rfin mdea Tnl+ index may llm b< mProdueed In uhak or in pan M anv mnna w'nMm IM eapmu wrmrn perminwn M nc~ Yalmmal firt Prmrgion nurclulan. Ina A Alum. merdaw.. .... ... Yb. YJ.b Definnlon .. .. .... L1 Aml4een M0.]A7 A51cmf ... 4)1 Cenmllon .. .. ill l mmpmmn.. .,.,., ..., u<~eaM and muillalon ). lolnu. .JJ.6 C" <ampbnMn..y.rm,... Cnap J cwrnarlope ro mtloa .b2-). Flp. AS-2 a fhrv d D• Dn1PnM lnmWtbn,.,.,. .... ..1-0. A.1.] Devon and mnenab ..... I-].I. A-I~)1 syfmm. ..... .. . .. .Chap. t. MA Cnltfp. .. ... .... ..... ...41. A~41 pealP NarhuP . .... ue Dlfehuae.0ul7n ner<e19e, wYtrbl Defimnm, ..,. .,,.,. .,. .. tJ Dlfcharae. dnlan ......... .. _4 !.! Dehmuon.. ..... .. ..... ... .. . ..t9 Drlud ... ..... ... .. .., .. 1.1 Ilry ayfsem .. ., ,,,,,, .. 41.3 Dsfini)ion.. ., . ~ .. .... .. ... .... .14 chn qe, .. ..... . D ..... ..... ... .......I-! Dwmy dl tkllnition. .,., .. .... ... ......I•J .p. galup . ............. ....... Y) 7, Y7]. T~Ne Jq ) ~s~ M nWnreeuee .. ., H, A.H Meawnmena..,.,, ., .., .uc Unm of mcuurcmcm alablk mine ........ .. .. .!-J pefimuon........ .. .. ..... IJ .p. Nply ...... .. ..... ..... ....... ..... ...... ).) Condµratiom ........ .. .... .......... .Y] Matmab aM dimmkma ...... . ...............Tabk 7-J.I s~nna nr a Tri9n u J r. coin q, A.A.a Suppom .................... ................ ........ Jd Wsur fupply, amlliement of .. .......................4).), A+).1. Fi4 M4l.f Mqy araara 7MA lu Ipoae .,,. u ..,,.,... .,.bJ, M3d nlipll ~~~~.~. ~...~~~. ~~~~~.~ i....il.) pbnitioa .. ............... ... f ...... .... _.......L7 l5tup~gyn beMUion ....~~., .~.., .~ .... .~, ~, ., .,,, ... I.J $yfkm Mdmuon .. ..... ... .. .... ...... ....IJ M1a~oe ppa...... ...... .... J.1 rsM [ianll ISR-t Copyright O 1989 NFPA, All Rights Reserved NFPA t3R c!..A.d ow ehe Itrsnllatioo of SpriRRler Systems in Residential Occsgncies ap to Fom• Stories iR Height 1989 Edltioa This edition of NFPA 13R, Standard for the JnuNlation of Sprinkler Syxems m Residential Occupandn up ro Four Srorirr in Heighs, was prepared by the Tahnicd Committee on Atttomatk Sprinkler, rclwcd by the Comining Committee on Water EgtingutWitq Systems, rod acted oo by the Natiood Fire Prmeclion Association, Inc. at iu Fdl Mating held November IMI7, 1988 m Nashville, Tr:nness<e. It was issued by W< Standards Council oo January 13, 1989, with an eBective Nte of February 6, 1989. Th< 1989 edition of this stmdard ha ban approved by the Amerino Nauond Standards Iostimte. Orf>N asM i)awbraat d NFPA llR NFPA 13R tepramr a milaloae in the develapmat of sprinkler imulWioo design standards. This fist etticioa wcomptWa a combined eRon of the 6rc protection community m devebp a staadaM Por the proration of kwvrise, resideotid facilities. This standard is intended m provide • 6i8her degra of life safety and properly ..nrrrim, rn the inMlsitwnr. n Inw.riw mahiiwmrW Awellinn PmmWnted u a Aacummt which provide Por inmeaud levels of protcction to budding oavpants, the document has ako masidrxed the txopomk aspecu of a sprinkkrd facility u complied to an unsprinklercd fxiiity. N the nttmber of seta sad cities that implement sprinkler ordioauces continues to grow, if u tdt Wet systems for anaip raideotk! occupancies an be eBscieotty and e6ativnly insnllW in acmrdana wiW thu sandard. This document will provide rcquiremma on sptem design which range tram water supplies to hardware sekmion ro poutiodag sad loatioo of automatic sprioltlen. rx rFa~. COMMITTEE Vfft50NtiEl IlR-3 AlumB+ Rger L Albin Fanory Mmwi Reanrth Corp, (Alkrnne to W. E, wlkoq Dm ¢. Dan, Do-u Chrmlml Co, IAhemn<IOl L. MROOI Trq E, EralaaL Ivdusrnal RnY Inwnn (Abemau w K. W. LIndM DarN D. Eraaa, Cmltt fm Firt Reuarth IAluma¢ IoW D. Wdlal Raaadl P. FkNaB, Nal. Flrt Splinkkr Aim. IAlumam Ia w. Tewl '. ummm~n inc. IAIleman la L. 1. Dosedb) m EJlrva 4IJaa4 Ulwervnnn LaDOraonta of Canaa IAilttnatno R, 1 N'nBhU Camel V. ImM1 %ewr Cap. ;ill<rmn to D N }'aAal 0.gaw1 D. MYb+, Amman Flu Sprinkler Aaoc, 1.16emme l0 0.. 1. Gml J, p. Manaaaq, Nan RnnrM Coueml 1 Mlttnnc to /. K. RrthaMwnl MarvEE M. MEee1L Maawcll A LCBnlon Archnau IAhemau w 1. G O'Nalll inaek J. Mikbakb. Farman Kodak Co. Pllmau w E. 1. $rhlRhwttl laraTh G. NeraY. B. Paladrya FIn Drys. IAlwmae w E. C. Baonl Carta W. O•po~ke. Schemer Enpnwnni Corp. IAleemae Iv C. W. 4rhlrtnttl Jame tevlefL The Vitiry Cnrp. IAlnman IoC BamnO H.rY Skan, md. A,ane. or FIn I:M1ni) IAhttmu to W. DavM Hihonl Jerk T¢a4r, AIW Auwmau $Drinklrf Co. plumaw w l Zimmemunnl Jahn S'aal~l~f. The 3henwo Caq. Ulremme Ia T. G. DJyI Iota E vtoly, lliP $pnnki<E. in. IABemarc to w, Rmplinl Wimr A. We1B.lblf )tune A Aswciaus Inc, IAleemn< w R. H. Imam) NwnIhIB EMrJ K. BEIEid. NuBhm Ana. WIBM E. [a[aE Kaecl naaoc. Rep. Commma on Sally w Life Bari M. IAA wormaM Firt Sysuma S¢brnmshme D[ RnNe[lid OmivEEiaB uaaa v. Er'nauA cAmrman Oaf-eaRut s ArloLian la. Ea~a1 L BWkt HuEM Ava. IafarJ E. CallapMll, Rclubk Auwmalw Spdnkkr Co. Inc. Juq 0. Dwtly Nad. Am. of Home BuiMen [Iebald e. Nll~ai. 140 [ommertial Riot 4miaa ¢tlFb Jr¢wr. NWmc Ineunvm Co. Na1tCMEB Call, FEmory Mulal Penrod Cap. CwErBa e. I~wrirk Ulldttwnun LEbonwrua la. DaEEk LaYMA Maryland FIn Egmprveot Coryo- nlion J. [. RkW4w, Flrt 0.ermwh Cvuoal of Canada Nrry 5Yw, InB. Aae, of Fire Chirp J. Tw SRdaL U4 Fn Admininnnon WWr L TwLL Crrinall Flrt Prmmian Synema Co. la. wur. TbarE, Kemper croup WIW~ A. WaN. Rdf lennm and Amt. Ia. [abaU L Sallrn. NFPA Su[ Luiwn Tdu iul rraeunb rM mrmLmillp m rM timr IAr Commlttrr w imiimrd nn rdr rrxr o(rlur Nirron Smn rimr Ilmr. rAandn rn rAr memMNip may Bow aeurrad NOTE: MemhnMp m a Commilus EbEB na io End of ilWf cmuituw Ev mdDlunuDl of the Aumaaw m mY demmml dewbpM hY Ihv Comminm m aAicb de Ilrembm carve. /~ 8 1WF loom GivERnl PROVISIONS 13R-y NFPA 13R pramsm o(an organimwn ronttmed with product evalua- tions which u m a position to dnermine compliance wish Standard for the appropnate concords for the meant production of 6stcd nnms. Instsllsfion of Sprinkler Systems in Residential Ocwpeecies up to Four Stories in Height 1989 Edition NOTICE: An uteriskl•)followivg the numberorletter d<signae in6 a WnPaPh indicates ezplanmary marmot on that Paragraph Iv Appendix A. Information on referenced publintiovs can be found iv Chapter } and Appendix B. Prcfatt It is intended that this standard provide a method for thou individuals wishing to msWl a sprinkler system for life safety and property proteciov. It is not the purpose of this standard to require the installation of av automatic sprinkler system. This sUndud assume that one or more smoke detectors will be installed in aaordantt with NFPA 74, Smndard far the 7nsralfarion, .Nainrenanre, aM Ute of Household Fire Warning Equipment. Choger 1 Geeenl Informotbg Authodry Haring Jvrisd{ctiov. Th< "amhority having jursdidioo" is the organisation, ogtce or individual re- sponsible for "approving" equipmmt, an installation or a procedure. NOTE: The phtau •'wthorty hrvingjudsdimiov"is used in NFPA dommevu iv a broad mwvm since judsdidmvs and "appmvai" aaenries vary u do Neir moomibilitia ware puEhc suety Is pnmuy, tae "aumurity having tuns dimion" may be a Rdenl, state, local or oNer tegsvval department or individual such n a fire chic(, fin marshal, chief of a fire Drcvevtiae burwu, labor depanmmt, health dryartmmt, building oBdd, electnul ivspemor, or others having smtutory amhoriry. For imunott purpose, an insur- ance Ivspeetlov department, rating burew, or ocher insun acre mmpwy repraevmtrve may be the 'amvonty vaslrg junidipiov." Iv many cirmmsumer the property owner or hu denpnated agent usumn me role of the "authority having juriWiniov"; at govemmmt ivsWlatiovs, tae mm- mwdivg omttr or depanmmW oairial vuy be she "author- ity havingyurisdiaioo." Check V~ht. A valve tha[ allows Flow in one direction only. Control Vslrc, An ivdinting valve employed to control (shut) a supply of water to a sprinkler system. Desip Dbcharge. Rate of water discharged by an auto- matic sprinkler, expensed in gsllom per minute. 1-/' Smpe. This standard deals with the design and in- stillation of automatic sprinkler systems for protection r 4.. Ansn.Ae 1 -.:A...r:rt n__ n f.-n. ann.nr n rrur..r,....r r ..o-.... ... ....-.... .. ..-. _..... _.. _r.....-• _~ •_ •-_• stories iv height. 1-2' Purpose. The purpou of this standard is to provide design and installation requiremrnts fur a sprinkler system to aid in the detection and control of fires in residential occupancies and Thus provide improved protection against injury, life loss. and properly damage. A sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance wiW this smndud is expected m prevent Flashover (total involvemevq in the room of fire origin, when spnnklered, and to improve the thane< far occupants eo escape or he evacuated. Nothing in this standard is ivtrnded to rntriat new technologies or alternate emngemrnts, providing that the Iced of safety prescribed by the suedard is not lowered. 1-3 Degnidom. ARPmvtd~ Acceptable to the "authority havingjurisdie- tion." NOTE: Tne National Fire Prorcniov Astaiuion don not approve, impact ar comfy any imWWions, procedum. equipmet, or matmW nor does it approve or evaluate Intiog lobonmrin. In del<rminiq the aucefnability of imWatiom or procedures, equipmmt or wtrnals, the authority loving juriWicliov mry bare acttptentt os mm- pliaoce with NFPA or other appropriau standvds. Iv the abuntt of rota sunMrda, said authority mry require evi• Oentt of proper imW lotion, procedurt or use. The authority haviq lurisdimion coq also refs to the lining or labeling I ~ I Dry STtem. A system employing automatic sprinklers that arc alWChed to a piping rystem containing air under » ,vnFarir n. FinFe nrr._n__ra. r_n_._._ n_f r.._n_u_ ,.. 0.r... ,4. opening of a sprinkler or detediov of a fire condition cause the release of water into the piping system and out the opened sprinkler. Dwelling Uoit. CMe or mare roams arranged for the use of one or more individuas living {og<ther as in a single houukeeping unit, normally having cooking, living, sani- tary, and sleeping factilitin. 46ded. 8quipmeot or materials to which has been attached a label. symbol or other identifying mark of an organisation acceptible to the "authority having jurisdic• lion" and mncem<d with product evaluation, that main- tains periodic tnspection of production of labeled equip- ment or materials and by whose labeling the mavufaMUrer indicates compliance with appropriate standards or perfor- mance in a specified manner WftM. Equipment or materials included in a list pub licked by an oryoiration acceplahle to the "authority having jurisdiction" sad concerned with product evalw- tion, that mainnins periodic inspection of production of listed equipment or material and whose hating states either that the equipment or material mess appropriate standards or hn been tnted and found suiuhk (or use in a specified manner, NOTE: The mnna for identifying heed egmpmmt may vvy for each orgsnintian canttmm wen Product evalua- trM amen NORI(ItiG PUPS. DESIGY. IYSTALUTIOV. nCfEPIAYCE TESTS. nN0 MAIn'TE\nYt4 13R-7 sizes less than 8 in. 1103 mm/J shill nor be joined by /rrlings Exception: Lined smndarddry-pendent, drv uprghr. or drv used wlrh pipe havrng M grooves, sidewal! sprinklers may be e.Trended into unhemed array nor intended for living purposes. 1-5.5 Fittinp uxd in sprinkler systems shall he of the materials listed in Tabk I-5.5 or in accordance with I-J.7. 1-63.1 Antifreeze xlutions shall be installed in accor- The chemical properties. physid properties, and dimen- dantt with 5-5.3 of NFPA I3. Smndard for the Jrurallavon sions of the materials listed iv Table 1-5.5 shall fx at least of Sprinkler Systems. equivalem to the standards cited iv the table. Fittinp uxd in sprinkler systems shall be daipled W withstand the working pressures involved, but not less than 175 psi (12.1 barsl cold water pressure, Chapeer 1 Working Plana, Drip, IaaWlatlon, Asceptia« Tan, and Maivtevance T~Yk 1-SS Materials sail Oimnsbaa Standard Cmt Iron Cast Iron Threaded Fiamp, .._.. .--_..__ evSi 915a Cut Iron Plpe Flanges and Flanged Fnnvp ............................ . ANSI B16.1 Mallnble Iron Malleable Iron Threaded Fininp. Clau ISO and 500 ................ ~ ... . ANSI 016.) St«l Factory-made Thrad<d Fiuivp Clm 1 SO and 700 ............ ....... . ANSI 816.9 Bunwtldin{ Evils for Pipe, Vdves, Flavgn, sad Fittinp .........,, ... ... . ANSI 816,13 Spec. for Pipiv{ Fininp of Wrought Carbon St«I and Alloy St«I for Madente and Elevated Tempenmrn .... ................... . ASTM A274 Pipe Flan{es and Flav{ed Fittinp, St«I Nickel Allov and tTh« Special Allan . . ANSI BI6,3 Forpd A«I Fininp. Socket Welded and Theaded ....................... . ANSI 816,11 Copper Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder-lomt Prcswrc Fitivp .... ..... . ANSI B 16.22 Cut Copper Alloy SoldePl0lm Prcuun Fnimp . ~ ....... ... ~ ....... . ANSI B 16, I g 1-5.6 Joinis for the comMiov of copper tube shall be brood. Exsrprion: Soldaedjoinu /flJ-J sdldn mrmlJ may be used /ar Mrhprpe coppn ruby systems, 1.5.7 Other types of fitting may be uxd, but only thou listed for this xrvitt. 16 Sptm Types. Ifi.l WH•Pipe S/ateaa. A wet-pipe system shall be uxd when all piping is instilled in arcaz oat mbject to freezing I.6.3 Provision shall be made to protect Dipiog from freezing in unheated arw by ux of one of the following ::cep::blt mtthads; la) Antifreeze system. fbl DrynipP Syst!!rt. 2-i Working Pku asld Aaaeptasae Tats. 2.1.1 Warkiag Plans. 2-i.l.l Working plans shall be submititd for approval to the authority having juisdiMiun before any equipment is utiLiied car remodeled. Ikunuuos Irom approved plans will require permiuiao of the authority having jurisdiction. S•1.1.1 Working plans shall be dnwnto an indicated wale, on shass of uniform siu, with a plan of each Boor, made so that they can be eazily dupliated, sad shall show the following dau: (a) Name of owner and occupant. (b) Location, including street address. (cl Point of compau. (d) Ceiling wnstrumioD. fe) FWI height crow sectivD. (Q Location of fire wails, (g) Location of panitiom. (h) Occupancy of each am or room. /il lalcation and size of concealed maces. attics. clouts. and bathrooms, (jl Aoy small enclosures in which no sprinklers ar<[o be installed. (k) Siu of city main io styes, pressure and whether dadevd or circulating and, if d<ad<nd, direction and distintt to Dearest rircuWing main, city main rase results including elevation of tat hydrant. (I) Make, maoufaaurcq type, hat-resppnx element, temperature sting, and nominal orifice size of sprinkler. (m) Temperature rating and location of high•temperaturc spriakkn, (DI Number of sprinkler oD each rixr, per Boor. (oj Kind wd laration of alum bells. (p) Type of pipe and fitting, (q) Type of protemiov for nonmetiilic pipe. (fl Nominal DYDe ilae wldi Ifogt6s showB 7o sole. NOTE: When typist brunch lilus prevail. it sill be neces- sarY to sine avly ox live. (q Location and size of ixr nipples. (t) type of fitting and joinu wdlocation ofaii welds and bends. (u) types and locations of hanpn, sleeves, brain, and meNods of securing sprinkler, where applicable. ~~~ sr aarn, MURKI\G PL\\S. DEi1C.l, IpIILLlnflO\ iCCEPTNCE iFEiS a\D NVVE\~VCE 13R-q 2-13.13 To avoid property damage. provision shall be made (or the disposal of wamr issuing from rest outlets. 2-2.1.2 Only listed or approved devices and materials az indicated in this standard shall be used in sprinkler systems. 2.1.33• .411 systems shall be testad for leakage at 50 psi (3.a bars) above manimum ryst<m design pressure. E.r<eytrun Ishen aAre departrnenr conneruon is prorldrd. hrdrnsrarrr pressure rests sha/f be pmerded in acmrdanee .rth ?'PP.~ 13. Standard for the /nsrallaunn al Sprwkier Srsrrms 2-2 Deign and Inar.n.He.._ 2-2.1 Device snd )laterials. 2-2.1.1• Only new sprinklers shall b< employed in the mstailanon of spnnkler svstems. 2-2.1.3 Sprinkler systems shall be designed fora maxi- mum working pressure of ITS psi 112.1 bang. Exeeprionr Nigher design pressures mar be used when all Herein components are rated (or yressures higher than 179 pv I!?.l harp, 2-3 W1Ier Supply. -s.am~ai s•rmtslons. Every automatic sprinkler ss- tem~shall have at least one automatic water supply, When scared water s used as the sole source of supply, the minimum quantity shall equal [he water demand rate times 30 minutes. (See 1.5.1.).) 'tsr..rmcwr~'~cr. r-v L ..u..n~~• _ _ b n.n..~ n.n ,...m.,o,„. u.~.,.. b. ~e...,.n.~...nwo. (~ e . ~M - -o..., ~ . o n..m..m.a ~Nr rw ~ e.n.. +-u nn i'- - - .aanew.c rxr , a _ 6aun..ov Rn, W mmn...w. w. r ..~ Tara v .~ ... ~e..es,~a.s+ao.o ~' nwN..~ e.,o,n . ~ - FI{tna b1.1~11CatlnnNl CwRrYarY NntMd W TeN CaM&nn hr AMwpwnsl PIphF. / Co / ,wnamn nftl4~ ISSta LL IIIOS iIYEPI\Sl'f tESrS Nrl 13R-II that have been painted, except thou wrth factory applied Errepnnn. ,Speaa! residennal sprinklers shat! hr uurul/rd coatings. shall be replaced with new listed sprinklers. w arondvnce uuh rite ixsrm¢/rmrranors IJ.5.9.2- Ornamental finishes shall aor be applied to sprinklers M arrvone other than the sprinkler manuiacsurer, and nnh tprinklers listed with such finishes shall be used. 1-1.6 4larms. Local waterllow alarms Shall he prosided on all sprinkler systems and shall be connected to the budding are alarm s~srem. when prosided. 2-5 System Uesign. 1-5.1 Design Crteria-Inside Dwelling L'nit. 2-5.1.1 Design Dixhnrge. Th< stem shall provide a discharge of not less than 18 gpm 16g UmirU to any sngle operating sprinkler and not less than 13 gpm 149 Umin I per sprinkler !n rhr number of design sprinklers. bu! not Tess than the listing of the spnnA lerl sl. E.r: epnnn DfR¢R dr scl+ar¢e for sprinklers enuu!lyd m ao ,nrdan<e n uh E.rrennnn Sri ! 0(1.4 5 ! shall he m m ina dance vuh sprinkler Lvul¢ nurna. 2-5.1.2- \'umber of Design Sprinklers. 2-5.1.1.1 The number of design sprtnklers shall include all sprinklers wnhm a compartment to a maximum of lour spnnklrrs. 1-5.1.2,2 The definition of compartment for ux in '4, L_, I to de¢rmme the number of design sprinkler is a space that is completely endoxd Dy walls and a ceiling. The compartment enclosure may have openings to an adjoining space if the openings base a minimum Iinmi depth o(b in. 1'-OJ mini from she ceiling. 2-5,1.3 R1ter Demand. The water demand for the system npi~uig+ aigu dixiiaigc of _' ~5~~1 ~1 bathe number of design sprinkler of?-5.1 ._'. 2-5.1.4 Sprinkler Caervge. 2-5,1,4,1 Residential spook lees shall be spaced so that the maximum area protected by a singJ< sprinkler does not exceed Ia4 sq ft IL}.4 m°). 2-5.1A.2 The maximum distance besween sprinklers shall not exceed L ti i3.7 ml and the maximum dinanc<to a call or partition shall not exceed 6 h 11,8 ml. 1-5,1,4,3 The minimum distance b<Iweensprinklerswith- m a compartment shall be 8 h 12.4 ml. 2-5.1.5 The minimum operating pressure o(any sprinkler shall be m accordance wish the listing informatmn of the sprinkler and shall proside the minimum Uow rates specr lied ,,, _ ..,.,. 2-5.1.6 Appl¢avon rates, design areas, areas of coverage. and mini mum design pressures other than rhox spemfied in ?-5.1.1. '-5.1 _'. !d.1.4, and ?-5.1.5 may be uxd with spenal sprmkkrs that have been Inted for such specific residential installation conditions. 1-S.t.7 Posllbn of Residegdal Sprinkkn, 2.5.1.7.1 Pendent and upright sprinkler shall be posi- tioned sothat the d<gecton are within I to 4 in.125,4 sit I U2 mini from she ceiling. 2.5.1'.2 Sideuall sprinklers shall be positioned so that the degegars are wnhm 4 [0 61m 1102 to 15] mm1 from the ceding. fsnpuvrc. ,Speaa! rendenrial rprmklers shai( he insra!!ed ;r, urrnrdarcoe• n nh rl•r hzn¢ dnurauons 2-5.1.7..1' SnrinYlrrs elicit M m ~ mn.d .n ~Fnr d.... spouse time~and discharge are not unduh affected by obstructions such as cedin¢ stripe Manic nr~ligh! hvnres. 2-5.2 Design Criteria-Omside Dwelling Cnit. The de- sign disharge, number of design sprtnklers, water demand oC the system. sprinkler coverage, and position of sDnnklers fur areas to be spnnklered outsWe the duelline unis shall comply with specifications in vFP.4 13. Smndard joy the lnsrallation ul Sprrnk/er Srsrems. E.ccepaon .\b. I ~ Mhen compartmented min areas pl'iW sq fr /46 m') ar lest by J4mtnureJire-cared ransrnrouon, and the area Ir proreered by standard or quickaespnnse spnnklrrs nor el'reedmg !30 sq ft l!1 m'; per sprinkler. the s}~vem demand mm' be limned m the number n/ sprink/en in the r»mpanment urea, but rim less than a royal q(four sprtnklers. Openings from the cnmparlmenrs need nor be pmrecred provided such openings are prmndrd with a lintel ar least 8 m. 1103 mini in depth and the total mea o% such openings does nor erreed 50 sq fr 14.b m~/ !or each compartment D¢cha!ge densup shall be appropnaie for the hacurd elvsm/irunvn as determined by V'FP4 /3 E.rrepuon ,YU. 1; Labbres. m other roan harels and morelr. /greys, rorridars. and M1a!!s 0ulsrde the dwelbng unis. +urh /lat. smrwth ce:bngs and nos esceedinq !0 (fd,0 rnl :n maamum setmm demand n(lour spnnklrrs - 1-S.J Plpe Sizing. Piping shall be sized in accordance with h)drauhe calculation procedures to comply with SFPA I J. Smndard/or rhr /nsmllattnn nl .Sprinkler Scrrerns. 2-6 Inevtlzm ofSgrlnkkn. Sprinklers shall b<installed in all areas. Exception .NO. l.' Sprinklers may be anared tram lwdl- rooms not erceedmg 55 sq fr 15.1 mrl wish nnncombnsuhle plembin¢ fixnves. Exception Nn. 2.' Sprinklers mar he amuad tram small duthes closets Where Ilse least dimenmun days wr e.rceed ! h 10.9 m/and the area does nor exceed '4 sq fr !' ? m'/ and rhr nu//s and ceding tier surfaced xnh noncnrnbgsuble ur hmu- rd romhurnhle ma!e•iaL as defined br 4'FP.4 110, .Aandvrd tin types al Hudamg Cnnsnar(mn. Exception No. d.' Sprinklers mar be nmrtrrd irnm •rpen atta<hedr porches, bakonirs, mrndars. and Hairs. Exception No. 4.' .Sprinklers mar be mm~nd (rum uuh~ penthouse equlpmenr rooms, stand spaces llnnrheiling spur es. elevaror shafts. and other ranrealed spores that are Her used nr intended for living purposes or snuv¢e. 2•T Mnint<nvnce. The owner is rcsponvhlc for the <On- dition of a sprinkler system and shall keep the system in normal operating condition. ~/ 1~ +sn Ea..r UM-U Beeraom O 4v~ngro /43 Mobile Home Bedroom N fwaan W, ignmon C Cnev Spr~nkier B 8eH CW Curuwf HB HeM BmrE D prnmr N N~gnt $unB CH Chat L l+ma Frot 51 Uniu: t in. - 35A mm. Fare A-1-Ne) Belrogm. % Ignmon O Spnnkler CII Curt+int D Drefrr C Char B BM For SI Uoiu: I ie. ~ 25A mm, Flee A-41p) MaNM Hnee Bedeoom. 5-Seb C-CNUr E-End Tede CW-Curume L-L1aW t)-$annhlo Far SI Ualm: I m. • 8 ~ mm. Flpm A•1•I(al UNK Maur. aPPE\DI`( r Wam• Ma,n 7~C iv Gere valve Tp Dpmsoc ~ sus, `na n Cpvo~ Ja ee Donee 'R;Ow~ Fa<etl Wirer Meie~ Sn°:- CnecrVa.e Preswre Gage `/ame Winer cow ror.r.nr -, a~... ~.,. Conrerron I rieasmv oag: To AutOmat~,c + Sonnk er SVSiam Figurt A-i-3.3(a) Prefenbk Amogemept. Minn C~IV Gate Valve -Rubber Faced CFeck Valve Convpl Valve Opnan Ralarencs iA I t Eacgnpn /T ~~Wamr Meter No. I I Pressue Gape Wiser Flow I y Oomnnc -snOFptl -{~ Vulva D.ain and Teu arccsor COnnecliOn Pressure Gag. ~ ~ ]p Automata To Domesuc I sprlnxler ~ 5vsmm / sustain Figure A-i-J1(b) Aaxspabk Arrangemot with Valve Sppenl.iw. ISee b1.1. / Ezoepuon.l Mum 6ry G.rc Vtlvs Water FIOw Water Detector SprlnklV Menr Pressure Gaga \ Conuol Vulva Man Cgnol \\ IOOnon Reference Valve 1 Tn Aummeuc 04J Excgbon To DOTesiK Ee.,-.~.. $.;,,amY W Nn i. Ltill ~+.a~w__ } 1 `Dpmen¢ l Prnwre Gape Snut-pll Dram and Ten Vuve connection 'Robber Faced Cn.ck NWe •RUbper Faced Check Varom Opupnal. Figure A•2•J.EIc) Att.ptable Amgeme.t w116 Vahe $.Fml.ka. ISfa 1-I.1.1 Ezrepnan.) Tabk .A-i-S.J.t(q Fixnn lead VNun Riote farilllka (witbie i.dhideal dswmrtg ..Its) L'nit Bathroom group wnh gusb unk (indudmg lavatory, water clout, and bathwb with showeq 6 Battroom group with flush valve d BaNmb Dishwasher I Kitchen sink laundry trays ) IavamrY I $now<r stall Washivg machine Wirer dour writ dash valve n Kiser clout wrh flush sank ) Pvbik FmdllOe. Bansub J Drinking fountain 0 Ki¢hev nnk J uuwq $ervin sink ) $nOwer h<ad J Urinal wish 1 in. gush valve IO UrirW with . in. gush vnve Urinal with gush upk 3 Washing machine Ib Ibl ) Washing ipuhine 1161b1 J taster corn win gun valve I0 Water clout with Ourh sank Tabk A-i-7J.I(y Teal Eanmted Domndc Demaad Toni FI%tarc T.W Damapd tp Galbm Per Minute l.ad U.Im Fw Syamm. whb For Synema wfrb Irgm T.bk PMemiwdy Prtdomlwtly A-i-J3.IIHi FMa Tub Flue Yalres Z SWm 5 10 IS gpm 10 IS `5 20 20 )5 75 25 OS 50 30 50 70 35 W Ii70 OS ]0 I50 55 RO 200 65 90 250 75 100 750 100 125 300 12S I50 RO I]5 ~]5 1000 100 .OD X500 :73 2]5 '000 72S )25 7300 500 SllO colon as referenced in ?-11.6 of NFPA 13. Standard (o. the lnafallalion of Sprmklrr Sustains. A8-5.1.2 Is is intended thin the design area is to include up to four adjattm sprinklero produang lh< greatest waur demand within the comportment. A-2.5.1.7) Fire rasing has indicated the n<cd to wet wart. in the area protected by midential spnnklen at a Ica•I W imp faM 13R-I? (h) Care sh9uM bt taken to sa War sprivkkr are not painted either at the time of insullatiov or during subso- quern rcdecorctiov. when painting sprinkler piping or painting iv areas next to sprinkler, the sprinklcn maY he protected by coreriog with a hag, which shoWd be rcmored immediately afttr painting is fioinhed. For further ivformatiov see NFPA 1JA, Recommended Pmcaoe far thr Inspection. Toting and MvinKnonce of Sprinkler Systems. Appetsdlst R ReRreecea Pahlltatloaa this document. The edition indicated (or each rcfercvtt is the current edition az of the date of the NFP~. iuwntt of this document. &1.1 NFPA PvkReatbn. National Firc Protettion Aso- ctiation, Barerymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. NFPA I }1989, Smndardfor the lmtal(mion ofSPrinkler Syuems NFPA 13A-1987. Recommended Practire for the Irupec- rion. Testing and Mvintrwnce of Sprinker Sytcems NFPA )h19A? .CSnndard fnr the Inltd(ation ofCentrifu- gai Fire Pompr. SI The following documenu or portiom thereof arc rcfettnttd within this standard for informational purposes only and thus arc rat considered par of the requirements of l l~5 ,....,, August 13, 1986 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~vcA.NO'1c 9 ~~ ~~ ~ > °' ~~,A ~~~ ~ z F.I, ~, a 1977 TO: PLANNING COM1MISSION FROM: BUILDING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL FIRF. SPRINKLER SYSTEMS BACKGROUND The Planning Commission has several times requested a report regarding the value o[ developing regulations [or installation of fire sprinkler systems in residential buildings. This report is intended to respond to those requests. ANALYSIS Mandatory fire sprinkler installation on any broad-based approach is quite rare in the United States. Those jurisdictions that have applied it unilaterally to single-family developments are even scarcer. From the data gathered there is only one jurisdiction in the United States that has applied sprinkler requirements to single family residential uses [or any length of time: rhar nrdinanoe was adopted by the City oP San Clemente. Calitornie in 1979, before [he advent of current residential sprinkler standards. The cities of Arroyo Grande, California end Scottsdale, Arizona implemented ordinances late in 1985 and early this year, respectively. Seottsdale's ordinance only applies to newly developing areas of the City. Arroyo Grande's ordinance was placed on moratorium before it became effective and the moratorium currently remains in effect with revision anticipated in the near future. The City of Fontana recently introduced an ordinance to requ[re sprinklers In all new buildings except private garages, sheds, etc., under 200 sq. tt. in area, which at time of writing of this report was pending second reading. Their ordinance is not clear es to retrofitting existing structures. In addition to the cities above, there ere a number of jurisdictions that apply sprinkler requirements in new multiple dwellings and quite a few that require sprinklers under certain conditions, such ae poor access, rugged terrain, inadequate water supply or remoteness. (The Foothill Fire District has required installation of sprinklers on a case by case basis where access is difficult.) ITEM W In most cases, the adoption of a broad residential sprinkler ordinances has been accompanied by modification of in[restructure requirements such as reduction in water main size, increased eul- de-sae lengths, narrower streets, etc., to offset additional costs of construction. Most oP the promotional information in circulation also indicates potential insurance savings to homeowners, however, we have not been able to verify that such would apply to Rancho CucemonQa. In [act we have been advised that some insurance companies add a penalty for potential water damage if sprinklers are installed. Most o[ the data available regarding residential tire- sprinkler systems stems from tests conducted since 1979. Initial tests tna,cetee that conmerclalltndustr iel ^, ystems were slow in operation and did not provide the wetting patterns needed for residential installation. Subsequently, new spray heeds were developed end tested end in late 1980 a new standard for [ire sprinklers was adopted by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). This standard is known ea ^NPPA Standard 13 D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- end-Two Pemily Dwellings and Mobile Homes". The Standard states clearly that its purpose was "intended to provide a method for those individuals wishing to install a sprinkler system for additional life safety and property protection. [t is not the purpose of this standard to ret~uire the installation of en automatic sprinkler system" (emphasis added). This statement is at least a strong inference that the standard was not intended to become a mandatory measure as is currently advocated Ay many of the proponents of residential fire sprinklers. However in the peat several years there has been considerable effort expended by certain organizations, members o[ the fire service, manufacturers end installation companies to mandate widespread fnstallatlon. The1r efforts have Deen Dased upon the nearly unchellengeable position that fire sprinklers save lives and property and reduce fire protection needs, thereby retarding the escalating coats of maintaining fire protection services. On the other side o[ the argument, the California Building industry Association has developed a report, (currently being updated), based on California statistical research data, that seems to indicate that, Ay Itself, tnstallstlon dt sprinklers in residential uses is not the most cost-effective way of achieving reductions in life lose. Another publication from the National Bureau of Standards Indicates residential sprinklers can be coat- e[teetive, given some concessions from infurence interests and Ravernment. ~~ Most of those communities adopting residential sprinkler ordinances have made substantial "trade-off s" in exchange for the sprinkler installation. In order for such to be accomplished in Rancho Cucamonga, support and cooperation would be necessary from the Foothill District. Their representative has indicated to this o[Cice that, in their view, sufficient historical data has not yet been aeoumulated or verified to warrant significant departure from the standards currently followed. An interestSnv also icagn tM1r. hea ".:_-`aced ~;,,~e uur information gathering hegan, is that the majority of buyers of new homes are skeptical or untrusting about having sprinkler heads in their homes. In one Rancho Cucamonga project, where certain units were required to be sprinklered and the sprinklered ;•^ _ -cgccrS ly off - p: .pc.... - cyc w. . additional cost, approximately 80 percent of the prospects indicated an aversion [o the sprinklers and preferred unsprinklered units. Similar suspicions were experienced in Arroyo Grande with adoption o[ their ordinance. Costs [or installation of sprinklers run about ;I.00 to ;1.50 per square foot. Assuming a cost of 51.25 per foot, normal down payment of 20%, 10% lending rate end a 30 year loan, s sprinkler system for a 1500 sq. ft. house would increase the monthly payment by about ;13.17 per month. Total costs over the life of the purchase contract would be about 55,100 (exclusive of maintenance, repair coats or water damage penalties). This amounts to about 5170 per year. Anticipated maximum reduction in fire insurance costs would De approximately 540 per year, or less than 25% of the cost. Costs to the community for providing fire protection could conceivably be affected Dy sprinkler installations on a broad scale, however, demands for [ire suppression personnel and equipment are generated to a larger degree by comne rciel/industrial construction end by the potential for wind driven fire storm, then by residential tires. 50, although the overall number of responses to residential tires may reduce to some degree, substantial reduction in manpower seems unlikely, simply by adoption of a residential sprinkler ordinance. There is little historical date to substantiate reduction of life-loss in residential fires by sprinkler installation, simply because, until very recently, sprinklered homes have been virtually non-exixtent (approximately 2000 houses in the entire ?~.~.) snd therefore not capable of comparison. Statistics quoted regarding life loss in sprinklered buildings ere based largely upon non-residential buildings. The most outstanding life lose in ell structures results from smoke inhalation. Residential eprlnkler systems do not activate from smoke alone; heat is required. Additionally residential systems complying with N.F.P.A. Standard 13D unlike comma rciei systems do not Include coverage in small areas nor In ~ «g concealed spaces of the structure, thereby increasing the potential Por smoke development in those spaces, with migration to occupied areas. Initiating a reside r.tial fire sprinkler ordinance would necessitate inspection, both at the time of installation and on a recurring basis thereafter, if systems are to remain in working order. There would also be considerable additional plan check time requ~ree in the enecking process. Ti~is would rayui~a added personnel and equipment, either by the city or the Foothill Fire District dependent upon the enforcement agency. Sprinkler plan checks are currently performed through the city by an outside consultant. Inspection oY conrnerciai /induc[rf al sprinklers is provided by the Poothill Fire District. S1P.yiviARY Because of the inadequacy and short history of available Pacts end statistics regarding the subject, end the difficulty of addressing the virtually sacred life-safety issue, the advantages of requiring residential sprinklers is as yet, impossible of objective analization. A few tentative conclusions can, however, be reached: a. Construction costs would increase. Coat-effectiveness over the life of the systems would depend heavily upon coneessessions by government in development standards and/or the insurance industry. b. Property loss from fire damage would probably reduce. Whether this savings would be offset by water damage penalties remains questionable, and would probably very by insurance company chosen. c. Escalation of fire protection costs may be slowed, but probably not in proportion to the added costs to consumer. d. There would likely De some aversion to acceptance by buyers. e. There would be costs associated with of administration of s program, for plan check, initial installation inspections and maintenance rechecks. t. Life savings by sprinkler installations is, as yet, debatable since there is insufficient history to substantiate cta[ms made. We have gathered mounds of information, much of it duplicative and speculative. The majority of it Tea been prepared by companies or agencies with vested interests in promoting residentiai sprinklers. We have attached severs) /69 ~ articles that seem pertinent. The balance of the information is available in the Building and Safety Division for Commission review if desired. RECOMVII:NDAT[QN All things considered, the limited factual data available indicates that installation of fire sprinklers in residential buildings is p~ubebiy not coal eiiective except by substantial relaxation in development standards. Further, any increase of life aa[e ty that might be achieved by their installation is indeterminate due to a lack of historical data. It is recommended that no action be taken at this time; rather that lnis matter ise uc.erreti uniii suiiicicui iv.. ..o uerc accumulated to make a more definitive conclusion4possible. ~ l7~ ~~. Should you consider fire sprinklers? Then-re ease to build into nett construction, possible but difficult in an existing house °Ne ie a1 the crest of a xave;' claims Ran Coleman. fire ch¢f (or San Cle- mente. Cahfurme In 1960. That city be- came the first m the nation to adopt a fire sprinkler ordinance far nex houses Now, more than '.000 m the tin are egwpped wnh fire sprinklers, and dozens of other rotes in the Rest and throughout the c<umn arc following swt. Why^ Residemial fires cause more Ihan 5.000 deaths and 53 bdlion in damage every year. Even though smoke detectors hate helped reduce the number of fire deaths b) 50 p<reem m the last decade, dekctors don't put out flames, And wme- nm<s firefighters can't reach burning houses before ma3or damage is done. N hde municipal fire pratecnon costs hole neadih climbed. the costs of etfi- nent. m-house fire prmec4on systems have dropped 0.+ more affordable lams. San Clemente and other tines have found they can ga by xnh f<xer nex fire sta• liens, hydrum s. tru<k•, and firefighters. and possibh esoid or reduce future Drup- hM~sr spank/rrs go m San Clemrnrr F uSr nS II S flamld. Nrx rrsldrnna/ s) sums toss about SI00 prr hrad mnallyd erry tax increaus for fire protection. Another polemial benefit. reducni fire insurance rams. Bin 6< forewarned: you may ha.e trouble finding a professional in your area willing to retrofit your house with sprinklers. Sprinkler contractors are generally quali- Ilcu um Illau} aic r<iuuaw ~ u m . ~ unknown market, Plumbers and other tradesmen are just now learning about the mamrials and installation Drncedures that meet nex standards. .4nd note also: Sunsrr found no installer or fire-fighting professional who would recommend it as a do-it-yourselfjob. L- ' / 1 'lie West Itds the my is researcA Key component in a modern residemial system is the new quick-response spnn- kler hrad. The result or a decade a(intcm slue research, it is much more sensiusx than she so<alled commercial head. In 1980, after Leven yean of testing by the U.J. flrc Anministfall0n ann me raeton Mutual Research Corporation (FMRCI. the National Fire Protection AasnCldllpn (NFPA I, an independ<m research group, established an updated voluntaq stain dard (13D-1980) (or the installation of quick-response sprinklers in one-and two- family dxellings Local and stale agencies ralhrdra/m/mg ::ems a .heck ralvc. drain valve, water flow shun-oR salve, psi (pounds per square inch) procure gauge. an elrtnc water flow switch thai conncen to an alarm bell, and an anb-xaterhammer device. L«al lunsdiaions might omd same of these. when vamr begins flowing through any of the sprin Aler heads. the alarm goes oB. It can be a wren, heel. or an efe<tronic signal That rinRS the neaten fire station dira0y. Pi N. Steel and copper pipe art the most wmmon, thn'rc strong, resist expandinE or wit:,+~imp it 7«a:, auS :` rgs tar. easily withstand the pressures~of a sprinkler s}ncm Bin they'r<rclatrvrl) expcnsrve, heavy, and hard to mvall m tight atua or steer awkxard spaces, The NFP4 I7D vandard allows other pipe. such as flexible pdy burytrne plastic pipe, Dols d u has been approved bz an macpenoem .gar •••r ,.. protccoon market<t4t our press time only one manufacmrt: of poh hury lrnc pipe ITrolan Plaams. tie Lst on pope 1261 had been appnn cd bs FMRC, at leas) throe others are xamng in Imc &cavu it's light. flexible. and cos) to sea Ae into tight spaces. pohbutylenc is constdcrcd the easiest to install, especially m retrofits. h can wuhstund high sent temperatures antl freeze-thou cycles wnhow Ions of strength However. polyburylene is best joined xnh a Aeat fusion deice, which hteralh welds plastic fittings to the pipe, Though it makes for loolprmf pmts. the device operate at 5oC° or ho0e: and must be uud with extreme carrion m secs and other tight cosecs, Moreover, not many tradesmen have the tool You can xnle or call the pof)hun lane dtsmbumrz xc tin for profesvwnals m your area wuh heat futon des rtes Another plastic PiR. CPV'C Iehlonnated plumbinpl is Vwmenmes uud.rthouph it isn't appro. ed by the I7D uandard lit fight. inns less then steel or copper. and is usualh )Dined xnh mlzents and cemtnn A CPyC system can be largch preassembl<d before pomp up, but its stiffness can alu make longer lengths diR«uh to handle m ugm spaces / __ ~-' s~ cxsnvann TArce ryNs a/C'L-Iltlyd tprinklrrz mc/udr two Nitdrm and onr stdrwall Arad E+rma'Aron p/arrr nr flat agalnn mrfacr SNiaAlns. Two cmnpanie IGrinixll Fiu Pr«ecuon Syaems sib Cemral S inkier Corporation) rmw make nutty • sloun types of reidentul sprinkler heads listed wish UL; as we go to press, another dozen by ether companies are awaiting listing with UL or ocher tcsnng facihlie Pendem or sbexall heads cover as least 144 square feel (abom a U':-foot cvdc1: some mver up to 724 square fm labour a 20~foot eirdel, depending on waur supplJ and pressure Each releases an umbrella-shaped spray that should reach higgh an the room's walls. Some heads mount flu<h with the ailing or wall, others protrude up to 2 inches, as shown at left. To Linn xaier mmagc, onq two spnnutrs within the system should dixhargc as am one time, and usually only the one douit to the games Based on standard home water pressure of JS pounds or more per square inch, one head will diuharge at leas) IB gallons per minute. A ~cx b.eed of mrinklert. rosxibh arai!able neat year, will have a mccnamsm to shut oB xarer flow after temperamres drag, As of now, the system must be turned oR manualh at the sAut-oR valve. le an tmergtycy .. , Is water damage from a aDrinklcr system a problem^. Relatively speaking, it's not nearly as harmful as the spray from e fireman's I!z-inch hou. which can quick- Is cause more damage than the fire itxlf. But there wdl be some damage. 1'ou can reduce it b)' acting quickly. First, i( you hear u smoke detector or sprinkler alarm go off, get everyone out of the houu and call the fire department. If iYs salt to do x. quickly investigate to stt if the fire has been pm out by the sprinklers. If so. <lou the flow shut-oH valve and wait for help to arrive. vacate the houu and leave the system running. Don i ga back into the houu until firemen say ii s safe. Charred floor- boards or smoldering furniture could in- jure you. Thue ma)' also be live electric circuits indoors-deadly' with water around. W hen firemen Think ii s safe, turn otf both the house's elatricit) and the sprinkler system, then check the damage. One note: standard homeowner's fire in- surenu should cover any damage due to sprinklers but check with your insurance company before you install the system. Wlut ahwl retralltslgw In eximing houxs, inslsllers have to crawl through attics, working around already- in-piste inwlation :nd duos. In two-stol y houxs. they may have to remove sections of floor. After marking she location of och sprinkler and prwsxmblinF the tys• rem as much as possible, they will lay out apes in the attic, then drill holes in ttil- ings.Once all heads ere in Platt and pipet are connected, the whole system will be tared for leakage, usually with an air rompreuor. Before you Aire an installer to put in a ryn<m, make sure he has put them in before. Ask to see other sprinkler jobs he's done and talk with thou homwwnen. Before you buy, ask your I«al fire inspec- tor for advice on ordinances and codes. He ma) come out to your hoax to see if there arc ant' major problems to amim- patn. Houus with cathedral ceding.. well water systems, or hard-to-reach xcond- story areas, for example, may regmre special designs. Also, check with your insurance company far possible reductions in your fire insur- ance rates. Recently, the Insurance Ser- Q.p2^.^'::^^ nai innal i advisory group, recommended an I Sr per cent reduction in premiums for houxs wish sprinkler systems. Some companies oRer up to 30 pertain reductions if bur- glar and smoke detectors are included. The California division of the Ccnt rat a r<trefit urvice. Cemral rill find a~qualr fled person in your area m give you an estimate: i(they can i find someone, they writ send one of their own people. You might also arrange to xnd them )our houu plans so they can Dreasxmble and install a plastic pipe system. Grinnell will xnd their awn reprcuntatives to give esti- mates and install retrofit systems. Both Central and Grinnell have readih stumbled kiss of all the n«essary com- ponents far new' wnstrudions. To learn more about sprinkler systems and standards, write qr call any of the following ABraeirs. Aanonal Fvr Prmrrhon Asa«iarion, Batterymuch Park, Omnc). Mass 022 W; (61]1 ]]0.7000 NFPA has developed and continually updates the I7D spnnkl<rs, write for a ffi-cap}~of ~thc standard and for installation advice. frdrro/ Emrrgrnrv Managrmrnr Agrnn~, U.S. Fire Administration. Rcndential Fne Sprinkler Program, The Presidio. Bwlding 105, $an Franexo 94129: 14151 c5e-X194. or loll-frce 18001 6]8.96(10. Smu 1976, FEMA has promoted reuarch and development of revdenual systems AsA for fret br«hurcs. Nations/ Fve SpnnAler Asrruiarion. ReOin Hill Corporalc Park, Route '_2. Bos 10(1[1. Patterson, N 1' 1:567: 19141 B]X-4`00. NFSA will uib you a fret. freyuends updated fist of manufacturers of residentul sprinkler heads, and ample br«hu«s. CowNair+, Crnlra/ SpnnA/rr CorPUrarion. 1210 Sunshine W1z. Anaham. Cebf 92806; t7111670.A7J1. Gr:¢ne!I FAC ..°ro:man Sr:!rms 5u Matra Ss, Los Angeles, Calif 90017. 1:17) 687.9990. Trojan P/an/n. 2211 N. 181h SL, Tampa. Fla. 77605, IBID 242-1211 (produces the only polybutylene pipe that has been R «hnrond. I ~~ FIRE SPRINKLERS FOR THE HOME BY ANNE ROQUEMORE ~a Far yeen, aummatic fife sprinkler systems have proven thew effective news in protecting Iives end property from fire in hotels, aarea, schools, fecmriec end office buildings. Until recently, however, automatic sprinkler were not available for in- sallation Nhomes, end attempt to modify mmmertvl systems (o'r tni- dential use were unsuttessfd. Com- mercial eprinklen were generally too Blow to mmbet the rapid spread ni ilamea in moat hmto fits. And they wax designed moldy for large, open area with high rnilinga, rether thin for the many small rooms found in home. Research to develop an ef[ectly< emidenlW sprinkler gutted momen- tum in 1974 with We ematlon of the U.S. Fire Adtokdatntion, whlc6 awarded geanta a mandactuten a dewloD and lwt home sptMklar aYa- ama. A. • mdt, auamatlc apM• kler ayaama are now heirtg designed spaelfldly for mldendal Walla Wean a enQpermp meenanlem melee (bnA Valor rvwaee oaf o/ p/pe am/ b WlleefeC MeV Ores clap AsltwlWS /pore ,..e. ~t., ae.w (eeeYll MI IpMe/ pro/Ib, moo can• femponry look lions end [hey offer significant im- provements over mmmercieY syrinklen. To dste, two manufecturen have produced home sprin- kler systems that meet the USFA re- quirementa and have passed ln4 6y Under- writer's laboramriea (see For Morc Idor• motion, pogo 91). Meat hams fires ' start and spread srotmd a room's perv imeter, moving from futmishings to tsntaltu and upward along well. N these fur- nishings burn. that relew toxic gra Wet arc topped by the low ce0inp. Heated by We Ramos. West pees quickly reach We flashover paint where they ignite ezplosieei y, shooing Flames mto o:nrr rooms All avmmeuc sprmkiers operate on the same principle: When acti- vated by heat from a fire, they auto- maticdly open to spray a mntinvow stream of water ti all directiotu up- tLL they are shut off manually. To mntrol perimeter-type {ices end prevent flashover, residential sptlnklen are designed to discharge water In an umbrelleahaped spay which hits high on the watts. This creates a misting pattern that helps diffuse and suppress carbon monoa ids and other gores, retarsis temper- ature buildup and ex6neuishes the (lames G the room. Most impotlant, however, is the quick reaportse time-the lifesaving Tests show that home fire sprudtlen aLRivate up to 10 times friar than rom- merciel systems. In homes where rct• rofitting a whole-houw sys- tem would prove ddfiasd4 ' sprinkler installed just in hellweri and uuide exit ~ door would provide m ef- - !_' ~' fetkive esmpe route for rn- idents, accordusg to fire pro- ° vention experb. Mow soy weA £ach sprinkler head has a trlg- gering machmdam, or fusible /irate, designed a melt et low tempera tutu. When heat near the sprinkler L~~J ~....L~_ t taROC /J~....~J vtg on the model), the fusible link melts and release a stoPpar on the water Pipe which feeds that pertteu tar sprinkler. Water flows from We pipe and hits a deflector plate h: the sprutkler heed, causing fhe water W spray throughout the room. Residential sprinkler systems have been slow to gain acceptance ~ xt»a MDC9ANQNANOAPT.IWe ' 7~ TypkW reI/dglgal /Mr eprflatlN eyabm Nreblbfplt afrowe p/pe run ln/otKll Vaga erM enoaa seek loan ,ate among homeowners, is pKt beeuee of a generally held mistxwpption that (ix sprinklers ere -rone b mdfuncdom end the mWskee ar sumption that a false alarm wIS te- sdt in a great deal of watK damage to a home. In faM, sprinklers have • nputr Uon in industry end among fuc- fighters for operetutg dependabWty and eau of mainbwnra. A false alarm-when no heat or (lames an prexnt-cannot cease a system m activate. OWY those sPrinlUK heads directly exposed to heat m (lame vnii ecuven. SPrutitlen lentil N other areas of the house will eat nleeu uriless they, too, an exposed to the fire. Manuel shumff valve are '.,.Weed at critical poin4 throughout the system to stop the water flow when the fve v extinguished. Two types o[ sprinkler heads are ave0able. Pendant models art in• staled m railings: each standard pendant sprinkler coven an area of 1N p. ft (e 12x12-ft room. Were- fon, requires only one sprinkler). When acetvated, 18 gel. of water pK minub (gym) (low from a pendant head. Hy comparison, mpt fin homes deliver from 100 to 300 gpm. Sidewdl sprinklers en vuWkd on wills 4 m g in. below raLLip level. Heouu Pipes ere run bt eween wills, ore pipeline can servo two rooms. One Sidewdl heed p*o' tern up m 224 aq. ft. of floor exa. Water flow rage from 2+ to 311 gpm per sprinkler, depend/ng on the model. 4! Water prawns =' Sprinkler ax designed to opexb on water ptessurn nnrmdly found N reidentid erep. HydraWlc pleu- letiow based an a 24-hoW pressure test ere made in the home be(on imWletion. A romfor[sble u(ety (actor u added to thb edculaUon b croon ryntem operation m the - event of a preeuro drop. Sfnx roidentW syabma wero m- troduced, improvements love been made (het rdura Problems pusd by inadequate houxhold water pxs- aux. r'or etnrrtple, an tmprovd pendan[ sprWtler raw svdable coven an area of 190 sq. h., with midmum of 18.4 pi (potmds per puarc inch of water preeun) ro- qulnd nthe mpt romob bed. Standard pendant mode6 cover 1M sq. (t at 41 psi. Where walK Prestsro V Irssdo- qwb or water suDDIY V limited. puma and hoidktg tanlu aro m- sWld with Uu sysbm .{udible derma Should be N• sn;led with any restdenud apnm ppYYlY110NAL lFlIIIIRLgII NIUY ~AlYg11N _y ~iiin~ L .,... YwI sous. I/m start In /umh/r/Iga arwme gnmaren o/ roomF' afrsOaM savn4Nr sway nrnm q nor wide a Np/s anpuyA /or aRaeyra canhv/. kler system. M extertW alarm. W Neh rate wne., ..r..l.:..: vale, derv neighbors or passersby to call the ('ve department, An in- brnd dorm, or smoke detector, do- lecb a foe still in the smoldering stage end uunda a wersUng. Blow- ing oavpann time to esope. Installatlen eesb Then u no specific formula m ea- Umab the ma[ of a reidential spruskler aribm. Fach home u dif- femtt m sve and layout, and too few systems love peen kuWld to dab b create a wdform pricing steuetun. Exyen ntimates range from 31.70 per >Q. ft. to 1 pemnt of Iha tow asseasd vdue of the house. Retrotittky sribma to exLt- Ing homes generally u coon expen- un snan wwuuan m new totutrueUon. The tP\t of \ retrofit system de• panda on many factors. The number and size of Looms dictate the num- ber of beds needed. Standuda en- ated by the Nationd Fix ProtecUOn Aswdation (NFPA) limit the num- ber of sprinkler hells to two per water Pipe branch line, which in- meaae Uu number of pipe rurm and tM tow amount o[ piping ro- qulrad. Thane and other factors such r ehs work rxquircd, the can of tapping inb Ne water supply and even eM age of the houu dl dd m the tow apt. ftsaunme, tut and ronstruetion betseflL- may eventually offset rite cost of home sprinklers. Chink with yoW Wester to to U he often \ d4touat on homsownere' promiuma for • fuBY sDruddercd hour. One dab, Alelp, Blows • 2 pemnt ro- dwtloa N the (stable value of e sprlnklard home. AsldltkmdlY. [swtY IopliUe lava diowd building trade modUIC\UOM whoa sprinklers an InCludld in new mssstnetbn, m\ki^g rlatdantW spr{nklK rysbms Cpl<(fective tot huflden. A Izm7dl but growing num- 1 / bar of mudapoltie now regain --'done~el .pri~4Lr mr.ma in new-home cowtrucdon. As yet, however, neither the man- ufecturen eor mtudapal fin do- pertmeats recommend installing residentW aprWden e a do-it- youneH project Acrordiug to one manWactunr, We origind Plan when the aprhUtlen wero N evly development svu im mraumen to inabH the rynbtm. Hut a develop men( ptogreseed the system beome tin complex for average hutdymem Lt Jerry Grier, head of the Do- metlc Sptlnkler IhVidon of the Cobb (:oantR Ceotglq Fin Depan- went. Conducts tuUOnal claaae m domestic sprWtler kntellntion for licensed Dlumben, tfrefighten, sprinkler dLtrl6umn and even the manWecturcn. m ma opwon, "me hydraulic calculations ere too rom- plex, Ne spacing of heads too arid. ol, the Draper aiu of Pipes too im- portent to be left in the bends of an amateur.., Grier dviaea homeowner to let the manuf\MVxr, or someone they mvmmend, imWl the sritem. Be- sides knowing how to do the work, a profesaiand itsaWler can help so- taro the required pertntta, see Lhat the proper irupectlow eR made end anon that dl work romplie with warranty and locd buHding or fin cede xgldrementa. Homeowner may, however, keep ~ Mwn eM eoet n( Installaelnn 6y do- [rag the propannon and roughing-in work to the twnufactunrL speci(i- oUOw. Th4 could include opening wills, l.yktg N piping and secuzin8 permfb loony, which will redutt the manWactunr'~ time and taro for she edud WWLUOn, testing and WpeNom IW ROII MOIL INFOIIMATIOM CeneY eataalw Cap.. TMe 6 cwxn Ave.. bnsests, PA ta44e anmsN M Plawcepn rA., to polrstxs gt ~•- gavn al p90e tvee tl RaaAMnzWSprNwYrAedaan aWpnad fa oYacnwpa ante Myls on a'tl/a asp- Presa+ty An{ flames utd fpiie yang ursdar an unMreMa-+Mpa6 paff/m. ~ ~~ ~~ =..% ~3i ~@ A'3" _' Svc £~ up~ia 'd" R a~~~3a~ ~ ,t~ ~~° ~ ~~~~~ ~ 1p ~A2S Su ~ gsfi?~,1~= j ~a ~~sS ~ 53~~~~ Y': Spa ~~~aS _ a a~~ x~ya ~~_ ~Y~ia~ aiCCe ~ a~S~3~A :~~i:C pC rrr ~_ i ~ ~ a ~ s _ ~ C C. j ~ ~ ~. c8 rn --~ ~~ ' ~ a t ia 7 ~ CA ~ e A ~ r R E Z~ ~ ~ • ( pp N •N iaai g :~~ .~ g6~n~G S°~ g ~r_. =a3~1-a a~~~ ;Q~ >.~3 Sg~z~i;i~ndFX wa~~ S-GS 4%36 i R~;3 ~~a~~~`~fi~~ .6 ~~8 175 - ~~'UM TRADING-OFF LIFE SAFETY J. WafMCOOn Staff Fve PratecOCn Consultant Burns & McDonnell Engineers & Archdects Trade-eHs -budding code conces- sions inexchange for the installation of an automatic sprinkler system -are not only sacrificing life satery, they're also infringing on the professional in- tegrityand expertise of the architect to design a facility that satisfied his or her ethical and moral obligation to provide the user maximum safety from the con- sequences of fire and adequate, safe, egress in a building emergency. Even with the knowledge chat a sprinkler system, like any mechanical system, is subject Io failure or malfunc- hon, building code departments in many pans of the country are being rod fn rnrlnnn lira aaroW nnn- struction features in buildings as a means of underwriting the costs of in- stalling sprinkler systems, providing construction cost savings, and adding additional space That would have tradi- tionally been allocated by code to ex- isting provisions. We have all lived with trade-offs for years. All of our building codes allow soma degree of area end height in• creases, and the NFPA Life Safety Code contains amultitude oftrade-oNs (called "exceptions"),for facilities pro- tatted with automatic sprinkler sys- tems. N_y,. F__(hia,ra~ling ~Nql tradl(idnal tits safety construction in exchange for this mechanical property protection system become a national epidemic? Special interest groups are the an- swer; and their special interests are strictly economic, with apparently in• sufficient regard for life safety remiHca• Lions. Automatic sprinklers do have en ex• ceptional record of properly protec• lion, end it is not diNicult to cite their ex- cellent merits end recommend their use, Dut they ere not the tits salary pan- „lIL~•~ ~~: c.~~~t:. V1=~'1~~I.1: i i I.1? 1603 ORRINGTON AVENUE, FVANSTON, IIWNOIS 60201 aces many believe them to be -and many want to believe that they are for economic considerations. . ~. ~~ ~A year-!ong study by the University of Maryland in 1979 based on data from 27,000 equal fires and data ob- tained from the U.S. Fire Administra- tion Firs Data Center determined the fallowing: (1) Interior wall assemblies appear to have the greatest overall eh fact on the extent of fire damage, with the relative probabiliryof fire spread in- creasing asthe fire resistance of these walls decreases. (2) The relative prob- ability of Fire damage increases as the fire-resistant characteristics of con- structiondecrease. (3) The percentage of out-olcontrol fires increases as the fire-resistant quality of construction decreases. The following list of trade-offs was published by one national sprinkler manufaqurer, and reprinted in an ar- ti~le by a member of the staff of Factory Mutual Inswance Engineering Divi- sion inthe Conaulting Englnear trade magazine. I quote from the paragraph preceding the list: "Building owners can also find sgnAicant savings in na- duced carsaucUon cash and lrx:reased occupancy capacity. These are achieved pnmeny because spdnkler protecton may permit a oars hexids in- terprateHon of bulMlrg codes. . tla weivens or sects-offs may inc,bda:"(The following list is identical to the list found in the sprinkler manufacturePs brochure.) • Increases of t00M°to 300Wo in gross floor areas, depending upon cccu- pency, might, and construction. • An increase in building height equivalent to one additional story or 10 lest, unless the occupancy or construction otherwise requires sprinklers. • Elimination of the requirement for smokeproof tower exit construction or stairwell prassurixation. • Reductions in the fireprooling re- quirements for structural members of the building as well as the fire re• sistance ratings of the ceiling, well, and floor assemblies. • Reductions in the fire rating of clo- sums for vertical openings. • Increasedtravei distances of 50°k to 100% to exits. • increasec anowaole exn capaary per unit width o! exit stairways. • Increased numberand size of open- ings in fire walls. • Less frequent subdivision of attic and concealed spaces by fire and draH stops. • Elimination of fire dampers in ducts and plenums except at fire walls, horizontal exitways, and vertical shafts. • Reduced thickness of combustible roof framing members. • Elimination of automatic door clo- sures an corridor doors. • Reduclionin numberand location of automatic fire detectors. • Greaterfreedomin choice of interior materials in terms of combustibility and flamespread ratings. Spdnkler Falluros Remember, too, that a sprinkler sys- tem is a mechanical system and, as such. is subject to failure. Recorded reasons for sprinkler failure are: • A water supply valve leH closed. • A system shut down for remodeling or repair. The recent fire in the Texas School Book Depositary building is a prime example. The facility was completely sprinklered, but at the time of the fire the sprinkler system water supply valve was closed to fa- cilitate repair of leeks, and inadver- tently left in the closed position over• night. • A change of occupancy creating a fire so intense it overpowers the original design of the sprinkler sys- tem, as in a recent 10 million dollar K-Mart fire. • Afire above the ceiling. The fire ins New Vork City high rise in 1970 is a classic example of what could hap- peneven if the building had been to- tally sprinklered. The lire originated in the concealed space above the ceiling of an office on the 33rd floor, (°peApd OnOak Pea•1 I~~ THE ECONOMICS OF FIRE PROTECTION: oecm_RAR Pi1NRR RF.RTDRNTTGl. FPRTNNi.P RF by R.T. Ruegg and S.K. Fuller National Engineering Laboratory National Bureau of Standards U.S. Department of Commerce Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Reprinted from CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, Vol. 3, 43-5T. 1985 NOTE: Th1a paper Sa a contribution of the National Bureau of Standards and is not aub~ect to copyright. $. 177 ~: ,, ~. Caut<uctifrrr Manopaerm nrd E<onarnics, 1915, 3, 03-37 J The economics of fire protection: fast-response residential sprinklers R.T. RUEGG std S.K. FULLER Operwiw Rrvar<A D(wtlwt Nrbd EiyiwwlN fakaa>y NwbW Bmraa oJStaJardr, wawnprw ui. maw J rhnpnpreo<mwmrooN+ma,<rK,d<m.,ne:nqn-<nn,aed<iJa.od~miwrA..<~i<y of poviline foe lam wlnpslon thranyk tM mr of a newly aifopd fKhwkpy: Jmfanpoma, refilaffd rpaJda +yamu 77r inald cdalmar p~ r+lur art Mwfin m rhey world a<rnw ro fM awwer Pf a ryNea ihr nAxadwrd hyyphnird<mn y<rfaia foirn,>rylf.Jmdlyewdhnp, U fhr Unird Srarn TM a/t Mnd t~lln ~ <^ ~ Aonrownr m MN<md 6y rmnf US app<pn Jin lou <aur awrww a n ' ' r J nmltd<1. ctrl lpndb lfefAn <lyKY10AN IOId pl dl<IKYkI a~ttla.maJ wW Jield ffNt Break~aan oalwr an <dfrmd fo. Agla<fdan varfaNea TM awM<ae M aW foemhwe the rcanwN«Di<kn<y M hover rlrWkr Aweunww anlsahAnAtwe<ralalona The<ewdn that a.epareud Ma, fhonyh lmd w eu rontanlva affMrrrrach ad AWltirp canwtwifb whaW S hypKMkal ccw, hlpaayE<aftW oJNr L . <PlCfllld akAa fAf Ka11tn110 of haan/-- Fraf«n011. KeywoNr: Fcoeamie fualylie,aa prfa0alaq rdr.efde wpay,rnt bawdtaoalyrb. rirk-EeaeBt uulyua 1 J epnnkkr sysuma The US hat one of the di{hat Bn dedb nla in the induftdalizad world. There are oarlY 30 dalhspa million penom is the US n caopared with ao avaa{ef« industrialized countries of shout l3 aadarse wdlbdow lO is Ausria,Germaoy, Switlahmd and the Nahahus0l. Fue is the secmd mod froqumt nuY of aeddeetal des6 m US Noma. AddidooaBy, weB ova a billion dollar of relidmtid property hla eaulb each yes from Bra in oea• and two•hmily dwdliop door (Fedad EmaRacy Mwpmeot Apaey, 19811. The polmdd f« Im{a saving eaial is rnnafra to adun reddntid {re loss. Curtnt budBduY prelsuret, howeva,aa fordo{reduetioro is thecollanive {ee praeerion aaiviua of some US town:sad cidnA{rowia{mmha dtsrwm,dtia sad ieedividuahrarc,thadora saldn{new approaches so drc mitipriaa which wauW o8ir effalive protesdiaa a Iowa c«t. The purpoa of this paps, which i1 hued ao • study parfoshed at the Nsiood Buena of StaMard/ is the United State IRtap and Fuller, 19841, is to devdop and iBulune a rtuehodolop r« alusin{the aoeamic radbihty ota few stntgy f« eaid{ada{ raidmdd OIN,619b1f mf.m.Jr (1913 E ~ F.N. Span LLL ~ I78 °. ~ Ruegg and Fulltt s firelosses:fast-reponx sprinkle systems.Thefocusison moddlingthe investmrnt decisionu j ' it aRecls an individual homeowner. The inter-rdationshrp of the homeownv's decision with that of builders and municipal govranmrnn is also discussed. First, the papa provides background on residential sprinkler ttchndtsgy and the dedsioo process. Secondly, a mold is presorted to determine the expected value nN baefin to the L homeowne o(investing in a faro-response sprinkle system. Third, esrimatesof systemcgts astd pcobable benefits ar< devdoped for several hypotheticd case studies, and net present value bcn<fits over the estimated system lift are talculatcd. freak-even values lie also calculated in two of the tau studios to estimate the minimum or maaimum changes required for thesynem to t become cost :Restive undo various conditions, The final satioo contains a summary, .a6......-n. _.^a :_ee _... E fnr firnMr rcxcar¢h. Sprirkle tehmb{q Automatic sprinkler systems consist of a configuration of water piping t0 which are eoorsected automaucsprinkler hods, tlcvices which open individually and wtomstiWly by operation Ma r hnl-responsive rdcating meehaniun to discharge water in a apeciged pattern and ttegsity trve L a designated area Sprinkle systems reduce ton of life and properly by deackng a&e arty attd suppressing fire spread riche by eztingulshing the fire altogether ar contakting it to a smaller riot. Thus sprinkltt systems grnttdly inaeax she limo and available tortes for oocupanu to r escape fins, while limiting the amount of progeny damage. L Nol until rarntly has sprinkler tecknology been applied to rttidmual eat io the US. A ttew report indicates that there are only about 2000 hwtes in the US wtiic6 have sprinkler systttm (Dousing Nome Fire, 19g2F to contras4 sprinkler systrnts have long been widely teed is [ , commttcid and institutional building where thrir eReetivenest in living lives and ptMegiog propttry has bern well doeumatett Until rccendy a major technical impediment to the uu o(spdnkkr systems in nyideaca ores E the non availability in the marketplace of systems specially engissesred Pot home tnt Four sensing and activating devices arc generally required for residential lire than forcomrnercial lire. beeaUSC Iempen[Uttr aild gases flie 10 klkal kVCn taster rn finalRr rwnv whit rvww e.wL~:. r Morcovcr, di0ercnces in the typial dntribuliom and naron of room roman wtne the L commercial sprinkler heads nor to be well suited for residential enc. Another problem has bees system appearance. In addition feu of ucidenul water dncharg aaounted for further ~ r rcluctana o(homeownen to imnll the systems. The high coal of commercial type systems, u t well as the lack of an active product distribution and mrviae network for residatial users abo discouraged their adoption. Tkex impediments, togethtt with a bw level of publk awarerressof the fire problem land, hcntt. bw vaue asaigrred to fin protection syslennk resulted in little uliviry in the midemial sprinkler market Recent developmems. however, suggest the nod for adorer look at the potentul forfpdnkkr sysems in houses. Engirteering developnenn include the pradtresion and twheling of a fuo- r response sprinkler head that aaivates 3 to IS lima lentt tMn DreviouJY avsilablecomrtsnele4 typo heads. It also has an improved watt dntribution pauern adegwle for residential rue. The likdihaod of unnecessary activation of additional sprinkler bads beyoM those in Ike ~ X 4i ~7q The «onamks of (irr pa<rrion: fuss-respotsse rrsid<ndal sprinklos 45 immediate vicinity of a fire is seduced. The thrcu of aaidental water dbcharie from sprinkkr Reads also hu been reduced to extremely low kveb: kss than one-inane million ptt yar. Thu may be compared with the roughly one-in-orte hundrtA per year chansx in [he US of havini a home 8rc bii cnouih to b< reported (Federal Emergency Maroiertsent Aiency. 1982A New desiisn specially taibrcd for midential uu make spdnkkn kss obtrusive aM may meet aes[hetk requirements for most houses. Design changes erttbadied in sht revised US Standard 13D for reaidemial sprinkkr (National Fire Protection Association. 1980) offer the potential of lower cost systems. The possibility of using a combined pi%ni system, serving bosh sprinkkr and household water nerds. olkn lower piping cents aM the albwanrc of a snag~ arifin sprinkkr head recluses water flow rcquircmenn Funhermorc, allhoui6 not expliri[ly 1 :...t_ ^-~tEU...M~:a.as.~at ny<tM~.p:npv,i.(,:r,M:s:,;t..at.t....,._,_s w. fu^hcr m.t reduction. b not precluded by the US Standard I JD, provded d be approvM by a testing and inspection agesseY laboratory. Additional savinis arc provided by the seduction in fire insurance premiums [hat sonic companid arc offering to homeowner with houses conlairtini spdokkra Perhaps mat importantly, communities that ux residential sprinkkr sysems on a brie fcab may be abk to rectum the corn of rcntralircd fire pro[egioa Assessment of the techoiwl perforonoce and impart potenial of the improved rnidensial sprinkkr systems b undenray (Budnick, 1986k u arc rncare6 eRorts to improve funhcr the engiswerini dciio of the systems (Batklk. ttsdatedl The dreiYas !~ Thederision to include fin sprinkkrsystema in houses maybe mask by individual6artwwmen std by buildenldevelopenwha, respondini to Darker demand, may oBer sham u • staadatd feature in speculative housin& The invntment dedsiom o! istdividual hostsepwtkn and 6uiklen/developer may be influcmed by mated sax, code and mains provbions of look sate and rational iovemmenn For exampk. some municipal iovernmmb in shs US Mve alkrcd huiklen/developers and homeowner finsrsdal induamm4 l0 ilnla8 sptid[kr syslenn. cxpcctini eeonomk~IradeoRs between these seR-protemioa systems acct oolkaivtly prot7ded Rrc prolecuoo s[tstepes. such as fin stauona For inuarsa, buiWm/developer who agree to {null sprinl[kn in speculative housin{ Mve beep olkred by the total ioverospent zonini approvab fn higher deroity housing, rcdtsoed code requitemenn for Brc resisuettoswrsrrlioa. and kssened brad set-aside requirements for fire lanes asd sutiotu These twnressioro may increase the buikkrs' profits and.or Tower hosssitsi cats to coroumen (Damfpp Hare fires, 19821 The ability of a communuy to reduce collective petasion services in exchange for ulf- praecsion i1 however, d<%ndem on she proponion of residenu who invest in spdnkkrs. For example, the decision of onl> .+ few homeowner to irotaR sprinkkr aRoMs little opportunity for chanpni housing denssnes or satin{ down the sine of fire srasiorx to shat, she private deebion to {rust in spnnAkrs and she publk dtxisioo to invest in co0eclive fire miliplion servka can be hiihlY imerdcpcMens. 180 ~w 'u db Rurpp and FWftr Made) sreufie.doa T The benefittmst model encompassm the fillurc benefin, ss they woub acense to a homeowner, of purchasing and imWfing a residential sprinkler system, ss weg u the lik-cycle emn of T owning the sritem over in expemed gfe. Potential bemfi4 comist primarily of rcduoed risk of 1 death and injury from fire; rcductiom in risk of direct property lossm W indirect krua such ss medical and legal expensm, missed work and scat of rcmponry shelter, possible uviop in 4rt insurance cosu; and possible rcdumiom in kxal property taxm if the community collectively adopts sprinklers. Potential coats eomist primarily of purchase and imuUatioo emu, adjwted c for future resale valve; operating, repair, replacement and maintenance cmb; and property taus booed ar. ttu vatitt of ttu system rte mode! aY.O tales into aaount 5nandag costs and T applicable income tax adjwtrnrnu. 1 The model expresses the 6emfib of reduxd fire lossm in expected value dollars, rcBeming the probabilityo(firc occurring and ofdtatha injurin, and dira7 andiMircct kssrm resulting under ~~ altcmative conditiom of fire protection. Varioweompooeo4 ofsyslem openti¢gcmtsarc oho modelled on cxpesYtd values, rclketing their functional rckdorohip to the proWbiliry of fire o«urting. Other benefits and emU art modelled dNermirsiatinlly.All dogan of benefi4 and cents are takrn over the rntirt period during which the homeownor h expected to hax horse r sprinkler protortionand are adjwted topmrntvalue dolknsotMttbey nnbemmpartdma L time<quivaknt bssis IRuegg rr of. 1980k Present valuer.mu arc subtrorled from prexot value benefiu to yield net preens value benefits or kstrn The model avumn the homeowner is risk•MUtral i¢ she same 0I putting egwl weight 0o t each dollar of bss and gain and being i1ldiRercat 6nween a given expectd value amoum a¢d iu ttnainlY equivalent value: It h funhtt asrumtd tlut the Aorrseowner seem W raaximiu expected net benefib obtaimbk from avaikbk funds Hessce, pmilive rset benefm frao applying the model arc interpreted to mean shat she 6omeow¢er aiB ge¢engy wish to purchase a system, span from ponibk comtrainn such ss iecorne arai6bitity and the sme of the kitial cmb outky rcquircmenli Net Iona. on the abet Mrs0. irdicale tbat the hor¢euwoet wiB ¢ot wish to purchax the System. t These assumptioss Colusitule limiwiom of the model io tMt homeosrnen io aauakty exnibir varying uegrm ui vial prcicreraa:. iw.c imyuiat irwnnwii,n4 anti tit auk ~r. rr uu; always behave as ratioml ewnomk decision maker For example, a homeowm wbo u rbk- avene will weigh the lotto more heavily than the gain and may ntiooally imuB a spri¢kkr system even when theexporsed value of net benefiais negative. The applieado¢o(usiGly theory to the problem is nailed to take into account dilkrcat risk prckrcrlas. Despite Ihae limitations, correct aDpliation of the model an M exported to suggest tendersria of the homeowner to wish to buy or not buy the system The model can be represented mathematically ss follows: ENB~ ~ EVB -EVC 111 ` ,., 11+d c where ENB is the expected present value dolkn of stn bemfin for total to a homrowna from owning a fin sprinkler system. EVBt is the exported value of the homeowners 6enefia in year j, EYC is the exported value of the homeowner's emu in year j, N if the number of year over IV/ Vii. ~,: The «unotaW of fim praertlon: fan-raponv rNdrntial sprlnklos {7 whkh hneflb and cwu of tk system am ev~huted, bepnnio{ wiu /~1, and d k tk homeowtseh discount nle. Dividing toW beoefib and toW coos of the spsidtkr system into major Components, tk model may k muted s{ follows: E~~- DI+PL+C+IN+MTS+OB (2) l l +dy . t t " EVC pI_S+OP+M+P+OC l31 i and ENB=IDI+PL+C+IN+MTS+OB)-(Pf-S+OP+M+P+OC) (4) ~ where, with tk'bar denoting pteseat value. -1 -=r..tuc.n r:.t nt Acath znd injury, ~ PL =rcdumd risk of uninsured and tson•reimbursabk direst losses, 1 C = redumd risk of out-of-pockn irditect ewts, IN -imuranm premium discounLL INok that total insunoce emu nerd not k ukro into ~ account if it u aswroed !kt inwrarta will k purchas¢d wktkr or Dot tk homeowner buys J sprinkkn; i.e. only tk change attribuubk to spinltkn Deed k istcluded.) ,NTS -lopl lu saving due to mtmicipal cost saduetiom. OB ~otkr spridtkr besroBBts, such a. barer rnrptrtsetioo cents due w bwer tim raistaxe, PI ~puerhate and imtalWion emu taking into aerount finaaring, dedtrcliom of ioterpt cosu from tasabk income, aad other appkabk ua elfaeu. ' S-resak~promedsoftk spriakkrsystem if the home's sob prior to theeod of the system's . usNul iik, OP~total likryck opcnting costti ,N-maintenance, repair and rcptawmrnt costs, Pmincm+sed Property test. OC=olkr cosu maulting from spriokkr use The formulae forcakvutingeuA oftk above present value benefit and cost items am deacdbed • in the Appendix Seketed esx spggutfor To demomtnu how tk model can k fated and to gain insight at to tk potential ewnomk feasibility of residential apAnkkr sys[ens under epeeified conditions, lk results of nine hypothnical wse Ntsdia am wmmatiaed below. For each Of the nim cases, tk model of tk homeowners invattnent derision u applied m ^ spriokkr system in acoordanm with US ++=, ~~ -.. r Ruegp aM fulln Standard 130.1980, iatalkd in a aw, two-storcy, 2175 f[z (202 msk singlnfamily urban dwelling The following common assumptions apply to exh of the nine casn: 1. The probability of hsving a midenlial firt corrapords to the US avenge frrque«y of «curtena as rtvnkd by recent US fire statisties IFedenl Emergency Management Agency, 1982k summarized in Column I and 2 of Tabk (, 2 Sprinkler system effectiveness conforms to that predicted by the rmulb of recent US laboratory and flew tab IGomberg er ot, 191WA summarized in Column 3 to 6 of Tabk 1. ' TMc h~me~wner haz a Iona-run average opportunity cost, alter axes, of 11.J % including inflation, and 6 % without inflation, on ahernative investments a equal risk irsriia,ui .~ ~::.. 1977). 0. A value per file of 50.50 million and a value per injury of 50.02 million art assumed for the homeowner (Graham and Vaupel, 1981 k 5. The homeowner is in a 40% marginal composite i«ome tax bnckeL ~,. _. 7. Direst and indirm dollar loses per fire correspond to avenges of sample less data for tM US IFcdcral Emerge«y Management Agency, 1982; Munson and Ohls, 19g0} B. Insuran¢ rata and property tax rata rnrtcspond to avenges of sample dan fer the US (Stevenson, 1978; US Bursae of the Census, 1981 ~ The distinguishing ftamra o(each cax and i[s'bIXtom ling estimate of net beadlb a losses are mmmarized and may be rnmpared in Tablt 2. The sptrific care assumptiaro in Tabk 2 arc in addition to the set of common auumpUoos set forth above. The far right column of Tabk 2 (row 1) shows tlut under Cafe 1 assumptionf, oau art estimated to excad benefib by about f 1500 in prexnt valor dollars ova a 7D yea pefiod. The present value M loss reduces to f 100 for Case 11 for whis6 it is addilioaaBY sffttmed Nat leaf property nxn levied agaiat the synem arc waivtd and that yearly munidplcap pviap hom no[ building another fire sntioo arc passed on to the hotrsmwna is the form of Baer kcal taxn Thin vault is very close to a brcaksvcn ouleom4 For Case 111 it is further aawmad that a federal Iaa credit of 2f1•/, of initial cosu is allowed to homeownm who imla6 the syatm4 rnultin8 to a preunl value rwt oerwnt ui i2w. Imkad of } in. (1.27 cm{ polYbmykne piping used in Case t, more cosUY I} in. (7,17 eml copper pipin6 is used in Cane IV, rnulting in a premnt value nee loss of approaiautNy SJSOD. This eau is preserved to provide an update of an prlkr cost study (Jensen n of,1978) and to demoatrate the signifigetx of smaller, less expemive polybutykoe p(piog k achieving system cost red«tion. Cau V addslo Cau IV the pasimistkassumptioo ofawaterdeetaadehargefor housn with sprinkler systems. whkh i«rcasa the present value net less to SSf00. This case demoanata the impediment to sprinkler use that is imposed Dy • municipality whkh kvks a water demand or'stardby' fa. Cau V I diners from Cau 1 u follows: the homeowner buys no fire iasuraaee and the cat savings trom nos insuring art attributed [o the spinkkr sysem. The witattd saute of the nrategy, given'avenge risks of dre and attociated ksvs, u a anent value oet beaagt d f900 over l0 yarn. This afe is unlikely to be widely applkahk hearse mat homeowmn arc rc9uircd to carry fire imurana as a condition of obuining a moftpg or, in my cafe, do na ckst tn'sel4iaure haaufe they are risk averse. ' L / V u ~~ ~~°S as ar v.£:'g °: $$ ¢~ ~jc S~ ~i~: L y 4 0 s5 ~ E NY $ r _ y 5 `o ',-, 3 =~" ~' 9 ~' ~ O E .="Y5 x = ~ c i ~ ~g~~~~ 6 6 P ~ ~ ~ g•. $ u E o y °.e' ~ 8~ ~&8~~~: ,z e <~ll ~w~'L~ ~ ~ ° n y d 9 E 9 s ~ ~ $ c 'a a CO ~ 8~ ~ q N Z! y O i ~ S ~ F e E fi ,~- s 3';_ s RS ~ 2SE < ` S a ~ - oc 2<^V C ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o_ ' b-w E ~~ gS~~_3ja~ ? HO ~° ~ E=i O ~ cd oo'`' a i'S ` - s°~~~~i 35~nn1 e. `o C•g ~v~ ~.e aa~~Q ~' ~~ 'dry ~ ~~ Y ~~~5~~9 a r, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W 3 a ~~ ~b~~y a_ _ g ~ ~ w~,ua~YA n .Y. 8 P c,~ . e .S S -' L t S$y~ E 3 ~ 3 $ .~ '~ ;fix ~-~a8`' ~~ 3:~~ ~Y~~ ~. ap x~Es s~ 3 n g3I~~ ~t~~s~~~a i` ~ u ~g~ Thr «anania of firr prgetNan: Jar[-rnpanv rMdm[id spinklara F e 49 a n O F h 0 0 ,„ ~ ~ N ~ G n ~ O ~ C ~ (1 O `yam 6 ~' ~\ ~iQ~ s O O 0 ~ss~}}~~ La a y°- r ~i ~r 50 Rutgp and FWGr ~ xxxxxxxx i I a~ to ~'z°r~~9~~i x' r xxxxx xx Ali x 7 3 SIB xxxx xxxx ~ i x syy ~eB ~ xx xxxxxx y ~p y b a ~~b~,~~30~8 ~BR~R~~~~ ~7Y y, e€iE x a 1 S~ I~~~~3 xx 9~ ~a tl~i~~ x xxxxxx ~li BE+~~`~~ x ~I ~~p~ %xxxxxx x ~LL~I~ xx 3v 1='e lyi+! xxx xxxx cl#{ ~~=~>ii>x J V ~ 7'Ft aona~dta of fire parction: fnu-rnpaur resid~ntid rprinkim 51 Y 8 fl ` ~ ~ Y 3 ~ o s°-fie 3 ~ .,C ~'~~ a Y C p 3 ~ `_~`- $ 8 2E p ~~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~~ y q O e= y y ~ C L ; n ~ , _ ~ c E '~+ g e& C E S 3 ~~ ~ o Hite E ~ mY o~~ o g $`o -s ~. p N• V 4 S ~ c O, ~ i +c~° ycg ~,J Nvr ~ 3 p ~Sos xgg ''S' ~x nao - ~ $ c~~ E S ~ ~° B~ o j a ~ cy$ ~.~bR~`g E~~ ~"a .S .~ S.'~ i " 3 ii o ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~' C n $ ~i~ .S ~~~g3 ~piy use QBrO C~~Qao.~w°_]t ~~a .Ya ~`~~ e3 C$4~~g e~a~ 'E~ r^ag ~~~~3~~YY.$ ~~.s< a 1ST ~ $ ~ !~, 6i Yea ~ : E 3 ~ ~ y~~ b 'i ~ - B a~ E ~~ ~ $ ~O r 52 Rurgg asd Fullo Case VII is identical to Case VI except [hat the saving from omitting imunnoe arc not r attributed to the sprinklers: i.e, the decision dot to insure U anumed to be imkpendent of owning a sprinkler system In thu case a present valtrt net ksu of 51600 results. Sprinklers would normally be deployed in conjunction with smoke detettarc ether than without them becatsu of the very low cat of detectors relative so sprinklers Cau VIII with sprinklers alone is included, however, [o suggest the added berkfiu that may atsrue to a sprinkler system in the cirtvmsUrsca where the beafib of smoke detectors may nor be attainable. An ezampl< is when auupants arc irswpuiuted and cannot respond to she unokc l detector alarm. The net present value loss of f1200 for Nis are is krwer than that of Cam 1 becauu of the larger imput the sprinklers now have on risk rcductioa This is likely to be an umleressimase of the benefits siMS the aceuwnfs'risk expatsrt in this care will be higher than the average nsk data used in rise rase studies. Cau I%applies the Case 1 mnditioa to a rental boost This evaltution roults ie a somewhat lower erecter value na loss of SgOD, reputing she depreciation of system costs. the deduttioo from taxable incom< of operating, maintenance and repair cosh. and the attumption o(a rent t premium to the landlord equal to the prtxnt value of the tenant's benefits of redssctd risk of fire loss Breaksvm analysis Break<ven analysis is conducted for two of the cases, Caw 1 asld II, to ndmate the minimum or maximum changes in the value of key paramekn whleh would be nearaty to equak benefits and wsu under various condisioro. Competed brplr<vesr nhw for the two cafes aR given in Table 7. To Drovide'a point of rekrctta. Column 1 shows the itdtial valeta fa Care I based on th<stated auumptiosss and Column 2 rhowf the valtx ofeaeh panmeterwhich would be sulficknt to caused brcakeven swtetrrrsr, all of the other 6cton beW anataet For example, the mulu indicate that any orrr of the folNswing value would be sttf6cicnt to ylekl a bwksven _ _„_._ , ,n ,.rh.. fwtnn remaining the same: lal A value of lik of 55.0 million (dinrounledF Ibl A probability of incurring a fire about oven times the US avenge nte. Icl A percentage reduction in the inwrarsa me about fiw time that auumcd. Idl An annual progeny tax reduction to the homeowner of about SI00. Columns 7 and d show the initial valued and brcakevrn valuer, wpulivdy, for Case 11. Theca results indicate that for this case mry onr of the fdbwingeonditiomwnuld y'tcld a b~ak~ even omcome, other Patton remaining the same: lal A reduction in system tau of shout 6%v ID) A probability of incurring a fire oNy flighdy greater than tMt awrned. Icl An avenge value of uninwred progeny loq per fire without rprinkkn about threes times larger Nan the estimated US avenge dNlar tat for houw without spfiakkn /g~ T` n0 J y 1 The <ronwnin of fire prortcrlon; Joss-:esponu retideNSel sprfnklen Table ), hrnterm analysis. 57 Caw 1 Cox 11 Inhial Brnksrm Initial &nktvm vduer values valuer rakaa Puamger ItJ RI IJ) NI Porchaw arM imtallation was SIMS -f16 SIMS f17p lantt rues arrd finmdni) Probability of 6rc 0.00836 Q06a 0.008% 0.012 Value of a fife urcd• IdiwountMl SO.SM SS.OM fO.SM sewtm avtta8e value dunrnwred 5323 519300 f323 SIWO property iass ptt Ere without spnnklen Perten4p reduction m hmmeowrrers U % 64% I7% 16% inwrarxe rate Homeownttiinwrana prttnium 52.96 Sf1.60 5296 fl.ii per f 1000 of <ovttap Annual propttty to reductive 0 f92 (85.16 57.11 relleative of municipal cost Redueticq Reduction fpha RodYetioo Iphu savinp fconumt bl' waivef of waiver d property ux w°assY sera ere the syeeml oa tba synmt) RMurlion in builder's costs 0 t1a61 0 598 laswmini a fWl pat-throu8h to home buyer) Federal income to credit las a peruntap of iniud purchase and inuallaian vent 0 90% 0 6% Note: Aaumntiom art murmd to tlrcir initial NNe filer each break.evm uhstWioa 'Aaumes w acupancy keel equal w the 1981 US averap for Ever in trhiN people roast killed a injurtd by Rre Heooe, thabreaktven value would MfmaOrrshmlhatshownforhoruer vritbperrter tban averap oaupanry .td larpr Wr races with rmaiar shw avwa{s oantpasy. 't netax rmunrennrnawruenmawalrq riNWars>wwu,.v.y:'...:.:.'~.:: .h::j. ;-'...::: ~..-... For Caw I1, where municpal cmI saving art patad ere Io IM hoelrowsr u the Wtm d a ptopeny tax rcducuon, an additional reduction of wIY fy.l l a rryuhsd W brie{ oa lasra to iem Sunreury asJ tosl~ior This papa hu developed ^ model fa evaltsatln{ the eapenM value ssf act beaedts to the homeowner of a fire sprinkles synem, and by illuurated the mold io a swim a! hypaherial case studies for new, sink-funilydwelfiop in the USA. The sesWpof thecae studies arc haerd on many aswmptiqu and actual rtes beueMs from a tpriakler system may be tayspidaebly diRerent from those euimated hest. However, the roan may provide imi{hl es w how the coa- eRativmea of raidmtial spdnkler systems b eRaasd Ay pertiadu sxnditiam. / V V s~ Ruryp msd Fulln Somc infaenca that may be drawn from the case stadia ue the fdlowin{: 1 la)The cosldfectivrnas al residential sprinkles syztemsis improvcd by code changer which s dlow the utt of approves plastic pipe. (bl Sprinkler systems may be uneconomical for homeowners who irtdeprndmdy purchase [ systems and who ue subjeq tolow-so-avenge probabilities of fire and risks of dearly injury erred proPerry loss; but they may be costegective for homeowners mbjes to highs risk office and in grass peril of death and injury if fire oavn. r (c)Sprinklasystems uc morc Gkdy to be cost~elfcctive,aher faaon remaining the same, for l homeowners who uc Part of a community of spnnkls was and who feRlve the bacfit of attributed cost avoidans by lost govemrrsmt a by she home builds. t Id) Homeowners who five in locahua month 'water standby feti s who uu comntaud f sprinkles sritems are unlitdy to have cost<Recsivc sprinkler syuens undo avaa{e probahiliua d fire sad rdatcd death, injury, and property loss ~G.r~Ha- __~ nx.t.. ., w ..,,.r-~ .... .,u.....«.t i• ainraN~.na .•hen addiGooal protection is tithed, moth u a situation whore the benefits of smoke ddictan alone t maY not be attdnabiq fa example when occupants arciocapaciutcd and tams respond tothe alarm. f Thee case findings, though hypdherical, are helpful in identifying the follsido{silica! ueas for further exploration; (a) The parntid of municipal tou savings from sprinklercd house and the feasibility of i corterpoottin{ tax reductions. Ib) The feasibility of nose-performanc< iradeoRs between sprinkim and firt reshtaat constrtsdioo tllerhndt and muerials. ~ ' Ic) The availability of discounu on insurance premiums. Id) The praaise of levying water demand charges fa sprinklered house. (e) Approachcs to loaedng the cwt of sprinklers. r If) Rsrofit gpabifity. C Igl Partial sysurris fa fitutty-prone area of the house. she s4nnfita accruing so households with digcrent behavioural and demopaDhiC chances- 1 istiq Going in house of diRaent construction and agc. , Apead{x gcnefit and cost items of Equation 4, wnh ihc'bar' denoting present valuc: D/-[IWs,/1'PIfdD)r,~ DViruh'.IPPIFdI h•IVI]•IUPSr,,rl C~cls,/1' PIF)•CYr,• CPw;,, X89 i - Thr tralroadcs of fmr prarction: Jnstrrspasu retidenriol tprinklrrs 53 ' DO +AM +AN +AOS 1 MTS~I(dS+AL+ J UCRa,,~UPWv,,~(1-y) N ~ ~ t l 1 PI-(PI•DP)+[P! (1-DP)•(UCRt1)•1UPWi.uJ] - ~ [h)' (RPt)' lit' ISPWr,t)]-TC-DTS ~~ !-r S~$,•SPW;,~, OP>•WC+WD+E ' MIL(w„•Iy~UPW%..1+F[Iw,.t'lcr)+m„tj•SPKwr~~[i-(t~A17 rI to where, p(s,f), i(sfJ. I(t.fk rls.f) arc the predicted fractional rcdlrctiom attribuWbk to a 7 sprinkler system io the Probabililits, given a fire, of dprh, injury, unimurod old noa- ,J reimbursable property loss. and indirat Rrc costs, respatirely: P(Fl, P(F6Dr,), P(Fdl) arc the probability of fire, joint probability of fire and death, and joint probability of 6rc and injury, respectively, where the subscript pr refers ro a condition a prior protection; DY, IV are the etimattd dollu ralueofa death avcrtrd a ao injury averted, respalivelY; LDH is tbeastimated dolor value of direct uninsured old non-reimbursable bat pct fire under the prior prouctioo _. stale; CVs, is lhetstintated average value of out-of-podct iodircn rnns per Rte under the prior proleetionstate; Yuthe fractional discount io irtwrarttt prcmiltms kraspinkkred boux; nr is 1 the insuraatt rate per 51000 o(horrleowrlei s eoverage; /S is the amomt otimur.oa corengq in SiWOa: 6S, ALu the reduction in fire notion sttlreturc and IarM Iwws, respectively; _- Or xi theopentingl;oet oftlle fire nuion in year j; M! b the mtintelsarrttlwN dtMfircstatioo in yeu/; N! are the naMn{costs to provide fire protection xrvitts in year j; OS! are the wtu in yeu/ dotltereollective Rrc protection xrvica; N is the number of blweholds sbatiog tbecost rcductimn a mri avoidanm for colketively provided Rrc proration terviw; r, rt, rr arc the qq q mafgtnil eomporib income la% rate, ledefal Incnme tax me, aai riaclirc plupsllr IM ,.;., ~a rapectivdy; Pf it the mntrxt cost of system purchax and insullation; OP is the rrac[ion of PI Placed u a dovmpaYment; RP, is the remaining principal onthe Ioan in Yeu%: i is the interest on A the mortpR loan: TC is the governmental tax credit to purchaxn of holoe sprinkler aystcros; - DTS n the income tan savings due to depreciation of spttm acquisition costa (applieabk to rental htrwingl: S, is the ulhng pritt of the system at the end of the study period. where S, u adjusted for anY ouutanding buluncc on the mortgage ban. as well as applicable capital µ1m tan and, br ^ renal Aouse. Jeprceiation recapture tan; B'C. WD art the water consumption costa and waterdamage ar.r.. rvspatively, including thou resulting from aceidenul dixMrge: - • Ae rprinkYr rrslems bn'9n,r nnn< .,eel. own, n mrt b 09raEk to min. tM eurmalwn b msk pine ar intlkpWallaa a rpmkhl \al,+Fk in,,, n.drnlwl alaM/ pSe IINiRe le ttelel lplnktrll tl OM e! IIN allnbultl vklrk coq maum.e li~•n.~nr nt x. 59e. !oI rMmplr. Fein 119111 1 l90 s 56 Rrrrpp and Fulls E is the ekclririty coat i(applicabk; w~, A. arc the wage me per hour and length of lime in hour, resptxtively, required for annual routine maimenarstt; w„I, A.r m„1 are the sage nrc, length of rimc, and materiak cost for repair and rcplattmenq respectively, in yeu j; p -/iA) u rh<obsolesccntt facwr designed to result in a ttro remaining tax base at the end o([he system life: A. the variable in calculating the to eBect, is 1 if a rental unit, 0 u owwr-occupied; SPW<v, SPW;.,,r SPWr,r,, art the single present worth diacounl (ormolu for finding, respectively, the present value of the monga{t interest to deduction in ycar j, the present value tyf resale at the end of ycar n, and the present value of nc~ property tax changc in year j, esalatin{ at a constant ram e: L'PW. ,, L'PW! fiPW., ao the nnif;.m nr...nl vrnrth discount formula for finding, respectively, tht rota) przsent value to the homeowner over n yeah ofthe amortittd cost of the municipal fire protection ftrvites, the prcxnt value of a zcsica of amounb esalaUn{ at a constant compound rue a over n periods. and the present valuc olmort{agc WYrrrcrsuover :he ztudy pcriod, where UPW is baud on 1 period< if f <n and on n periods if to n Iles, the estimate of resale value should dtduct any rcmairdng loan rants owed): UCRJn, UCR~~ is the uniform capital recovery formula for, respectively, amortmng the structure, iarld, operaunp mainrcnance, staffing and rnhtt torts at the estimated municpal discount rate, a, ortt n year; and amortizing nc~ amount bortowed to finance the sprinkler sysrom at inte[at rate, 1. over 1 loan payment periods. OB, OC art not modelled in devil nor included io the hr:hefit cwt calculations of the cuc studies. Rekrences Raft<Ik Coiumhm Laboratories lundatedl Derrlrrpnnrrr aJ a Expwimtnral Pr9toryp low{orr Elerrronir Senior/Arrworor Jot a ResYeiwial Awrwrak Splydkr Nro4 Report prepa<M fa the Federal Ema{enq Mane{emmt Agency. Budnick. E.K. 119{1) Enkwefiy EB'rcrirrness oJSrarcf•IA<-Art lMMan aN Amaark 5>.Nkfns on LJr SaJrry in Rrsidwial OrtnFaatirs, NatimW Bumu of SuMardx NBSIR 142gt9. Waa6in{[w DC. H9g11 Dousing Nom< Fuca, The Wmhinpton Pon. 10 hdy, p. EJ. Federal Emergency Mana{<meet Apncy 119{ll Fire in tAr UnnM Slrnp, Nh td0. Wuhia{[w DC. Fern. M.G. 119771 An aoolicarbe of hdonic rndeain{ rwthods to rrronlMy changes in hwnet pries, 1963-1973. AREL'EA JrnawM, >. pp. ISSb3. Gomberg, A.. Ha11. 1.0. jr., g1kkL S.W.. Olknund, El. and Pacey, A.J. tin preul A Dedzan Madrl Jw Eraluaring Rnidrnrial Firr•RUk Rtduniun Alrenruirex Nations: Bureau of Standards Intera{emY Report, Washinpon DC. Graham 1. D. and VauRL 1. W. I19e11 Value al a tile: whn di&mas doe it make? R6k Andyris, 1 111, g9. Holland. D.M. and McY<ra SC.119TT1TnnJv m Curpwore RoJlrr6iluyand Crpml CosrA Alfred P. Shan School of Mana{emmi. Masrachuseiis Innnure of Technolo{y, Cambnd{e, Massachuutrx W P 911-977, lenzen, R. ud Asuxiatea la. 1197{1 Snd, rn E.ruhlrrA ihr E.nirrinp Auromadr Fire Supprnrion Tmhndryyla Uzrin Rtzidrnrlol Orrupuuir, 13wnnuwy RrpwL FederalEmerRney Maw{emmt A{eney. Munson. M.1. and Ohla 1.C. 119{01 InJirrr: c',,.r.,d RrnJtMlal Fues, Ferkral Erar{tncy Mana{mwm A{<rrcy, US Govemmem Pnmin{ Ofntt, Nshmpon DC. FAfi. 19/ - T'k rmnwniu oJJae P.wNttan:Imr-rHpanu rgWmrial SPuikbr 3t National Firt Prolemioa Aatoeatioq Ine (1980) Srytkls Syaaiv-Onr mal Two-FoNly D.rllayt _ ANSIMFPA tlU. RueeB, 0.T. Peatscn, S0. aM Matt1WL N.E 119801 Rwaaxun/rd Prwrkr Jw Mrmwlny LiJnCYde Coln oJBuildi.ps oat Buildfn9 Synems, National Burmu ot5tardasd+, NBS[R 8P7010, Waahinpan DC. Ruty, 0.T. aM Fulkr. SK (198x) A Brnrht Cmr MadNJw Rrsidrntid Fvr Splnk4. Sycews, National Bureau of Sundardc, TN 1201. WasAinBtoa DC Smvenaon, G. 119)81 fur Inawanu Iv Nwwr oN Dyaawies. US DepartttKet d Cwotttertr, Narioad Firc Prevention aM Coovol Adminbtrstioa. NFPCA Grant No. 76007. VS Butcau a the Ccruu. (i98. i S:un:t:a1 Ab!trart of rM United Storrs. 1980, Waa6ia8too DC 9~ DR,gFT FOR DIS11CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ORDINANCE N0. ~d~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCRMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE S iANDARDS NFPA 130 ANU NFPA 13R, BO iN PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCiATiON, REQU iRiNG THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTI RL pf FIID ANr7FS ANG r.F RTAiN RII iI niNFc ACCESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, CELETIONS ANO EXCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES. A. Recitals. (i) Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code authorizes ado ptf on by reference of National Fire Protection Association Standards NFPA 13D, 1989 edition, and NFPA 13 R, 1989 edition, each as published by the National Fire Protection Association. (ii) At least one copy df each of said Standards, certified as a full, true and correct copy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the city of RanC ho cuc amon ga, in aC:OrdanCe with the prOVt5l ons of Government Code Section 50022.6. (iii) A duly noticed publ tc hearing as required by the Government Code Section 50022.3, has been conducted and concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTIUN 1: In all respects as set forth in Lhe N^C itaiS, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled "Buildings and Construction", of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended, provtded that said amendment shall not apply to dr excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, and provided further that the Uniform Codes adopted and amended by 19~ Ordinance No. Page 2 Ordinance No. 412 of this City shall continue to be applicable to construction for which permits have been issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Chapter 15,12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 15.12.166 and 15,12.168 to read as follows: 1512.166 Section 3802 (h) Amended - Grouo R, Division 1,_ Occup~i es. Section 3802 (h of said Uniform Building Code is amended to read tli IUIIJ"u• Section 3802(h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1 Occupancy as follows: 1. In every apartment house three or more stories in height or containing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel three or more stories in height ar containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed to accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems," except that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. Tfie water flow alarm far such systems shall be monitored by an aDProved central station. 2. In all new Grouo R. Division 1 Occu oa ncins. other than thnce specified in subsection (h) 1, above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBL Standard 38-3, "Installation of Rutomatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Lonven is and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height." 15.12.168 Subsections 3802 (i) and (j) added - Group R, Division 3 and Group M, Division 1, Occupancies. Section 3802(1) Group R, Division 3, Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkling system shall be installed in all new Group R, Division 3 Occupancies. System design and installation shalt be conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses." (~) Group M, Divisior, 1 Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkling system shall be installed in all new Group M, Division 1 Occupancies constructed within ten feet (10') of a residential occupancy. E%CEPTION: Group M, Division 1 Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(b) 1 of the Untform Administrative Code, as adopted. 19~ Ordinance Nc. Page 3 Private garages and/or carports attached to or accessory to residential buildings may be supplied from the system serving the primary use, however, piping and installation within the accessory ^rti o.^s _~ett ~^ _~c~rAa nre with UBC Standard 38-1. SECTION 4: Chapter 15.14 is hereby added to itle 'S of the Cucamonga Municf pal Lode, adopted by Ordinance 412, of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to read in words and figures as follows: CHAPTER 15.14 Uniform Building Code Standards Sections: 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 !mended - Inspection and Testing 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amended - Fire Department Connet Lions 15.14.050 Sec Lion 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers 15.14,070 Uniform Bu ildfng Lode Standard 38-4 Added - Adoption of NFPA 13D Standard by Reference 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amend ed - Listed and Approved 15.14,100 Section 1-5,1.4 Amend ed - Testing and Inspection i5.iv.iiu Seccimi S-i.i ivxenueu iaivea anu D,a iue 15.14.120 Sec Lton 3-6 Wnended - Alarms 15,14.130 Section 3-7 Added - F ire Department Connection 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers Standards, adopted by Ordinance No. of t e Cf ty of Rancho cucamon ga, is hereby amended 6y adoption of NFPA 13R Standard, 1989 Edition, published by the National Fire ProLec Lion Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13R Standard shall be referenced as Unf form Buflding Code Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less Than Three Stories in Height" and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems required by Section 3B02(hj c". of the uniform Building Cude ds ado pied Gy this ordinance, exwpt as further amended by Sections 15.14.020 through 15.14.060 following. Section 15,14,020 Section 1.1 Amended - Sco e. Section 1-1 of said Uniform building Code Standard 3 -3 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in residential (~ Ordinance No. Page 4 occupancies less than three stories in height, not withstanding any conflicting story-height referenced herein. Section 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Inspection and T..-,i..n Cnn~:..- '1 1 ] nt -.fA IIn~6n wm Y..~lA~nn !'nAn GF.-A .nA '10 9 in Fn..n A.. ... ... ~.. ...~. .... ... _...._ ..y ...... ........... .. .... .. ~- ..,.. amended to read Vas-fol i-ows: Section 2-1.3 (a) Inspection and Testing. All supply Di Ding shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. R11 systems shalt be flow tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Standards. (b) Inspection shall be requested by the pe nni ttee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. When underground piping is complete but prior to concealment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for insDec Lion. 2. Nhen all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any pprti on thereof. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. -~-- F-- F....- .1 nA .nA .11 n41 nn An •A. alanm a. YiY Ury n. .... ..e.. ..- - bell(s), flow and VtamDer valves and monitoring devices installed and/or connected. Testing of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time. Section 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amended - Fire De artment Connection. At least one, one and ane-ha finch i 2 or one, two and one- half 2 1/2") fire department connection shall be provided when the sprinkler system has twenty (20) sDrf nklers or more. Fire department connections shall be located in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Ff re Protection District standards. Section 1514.05.0 Settfon 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms. Section 2-4.6 of said Uniform Building Code Standard is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 2-4.6 Alarms. All water flow alarms shall be monitored by an approved central station in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pro tec Lion District standards. Section 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - location of 5 rinklers. Section 2-6 of said Uniform Buf ng ode tan and 3 - fs ere y amended as follows: 19~ Ordinance No. Page 5 Section 2-6 Location of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. E%CEPTIONS: 1. Sprinklers :nay be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding fifty- five square feet (55 sq.ft.) in area with non-combustible plumbing fixtures. 2, Sprinklers may be omitted from small clothes closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed three feet (3ft.) and the floor area does not exceed twenty-four square feet (24 sq.ft.) and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with material of Class I flame-spread classf ficat ion, as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. ndoptron of nrrp i:fu Standard by Neterence. me unirorm uuu drug code Standards adopted by Ordinance No. 412 of the CSLy of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended 6y adoption of NFPA 13D Standard, 1989 Edition published by the National Fire Protection Association, lnc. Said NFPA 13D Standard shall be cici mic c~ ~niiu nu uviiuiuy two ~i.mwa.u ru-+, 'ina LaiioLiun ui nu Lorna Lip Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses," and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems required by Section 3802(i) and (j) of Lhe Uniform Building Code as adopted by this ordinance, except as further amended by Sections 15.14.G80 through 15.14.140 following. Section 15.14.086 Section 1.1 Amended - Sco e. Section 1.1 of said Uniform Building Lode Standard 3 - Ss hereby amended to read as follows: Sec tton 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in the design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in dwellings and lodging houses and in certain accessory buildings, not withstanding any references herein to mobil homes. Section, 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amended - Listed and A ^roved Devices. Section 1-5.1.2 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38- is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1-5.1.2. Listed and approved devices. Only listed or approved devices and materials shall be used in automatic fire sprinkler systems. I~~ Ordinance No. Page 6 EXCEPTION: Listing may be wafved for tanks, pumps and for support devices as permitted by Section 3-4.1. Use of unlisted devices shall be approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire tinier. Section 15.14.100 Section 7-5.1.4 l4nend ed Testing and Inspection. Section 1-5.1.4 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1-5.4. (a) Inspection and Testing. All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All systems shall be flow-tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. (b) Inspections shall be requested by the pe nnittee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. Nh en underground piping is complete but prior to concealment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydros taut test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. Nh en all overhead piping, fittf ngs and riser are installed but „ , ... ..~~., ,.,.~ . „r.~ ,. gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3, When piping has been concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm bell(s), flow and tamper valves and monitoring devices installed and/or connected, Testing of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time, Section 15.14,110 Section 3-1.1 Amended - Valves and Ora ins. Section 3-1. ofd Uniform Building Code Standard 3 - is ereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-1.1 Valves and Ora ins. Each System shall have a single control valve arranged td shut off hoth the domestic and sp^inkler systems, and a separate shut-off for the domestic system only. EXCEPTIONS: 1. The sprinkler system piping may have a separate control valve where supervised by one of the fo11ow1ng methods: 19~ Ordinance No. Page 7 a. Central station, proprietary or remote station alarm system. b. Local alarm service that will cause the sounding of an audible si goal at a constantly attended point. 2. A separate shut-off valve is not required for the domestic water supply in multipurpose piping systems. Section 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms. Section 3-6 of said ilnifnrm glli ldin~ Endo Cfa nA a,rd 38-d fg he ro by amnnA CA to waA ee fnll~w~; Section 3-6 Alarms. Local waterflow alarm(s) shall be provided on all systems. The waterflow alarm or alarms shall be located on (an) exterior wall(s), or such other location(s) as approved by the Building Official with the Concurrence of the Fire Chief, and so located as to be audible throughout the building. Section 15.14.130 Section 3-7 Added Fire De artment Connection. Chapter 3 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 3 -4 is hereby amended by addition of Section 3-7 to read as follows: Section 3-7 Fire Oepartment Connection. All R-3 occupancies exceeding 5000 sq.ft. in floor area shalt be provided with an approved fire department connec tton installed in accordance with nanciw ~ucamunye Fire Fro tecciun uiacricc aia nuards. Section 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Pmended - Location of S rinklers. Section 4-6 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 3 -4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 4-6 Location of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. EXCEPTION: 1. Sprinklers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding fifty- five square feet (55 sq.ft.) in floor area wf th non-combo stiDte plumbing fixtures. 2. Sprinkler maY be omitted tram small closet; where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed three feet (3 ft.) and the floor area does not exceed twenty-four square feet (24 sq.ft.) and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with materfals of Class 1 flame spread classification as deffned in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 199 Ordinance No. Page 8 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. 4. Sprinklers may be omitted from entra me foyers that are not the only jeans of egress. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign Lhis Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general ^~~l~tion puhlistien ~ the rity qs nnta rio, Ca'ifornia, ar~d cir~aiaied in^the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca'.iforn ia. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 1990. AYES: NOES: A85ENT: Dennis L, Stout, Mayor - CITY OF RANCHO CL.!CA;r10NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer 9Y: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer I SUBJECT: Status of project for signal and intersection ' reconstruction at Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. This project consists of a new traffic signal and a major real9gnment of Rochester Avenue Lhrough this intersection. Right-of-Nay purchase 1s required and a permit is required from Caltrans. The Ctty had to assume responsibility for this project sometime ago because, due to a below average accident rate, Caltrans had it set at a low priority. In order to make review and processing by the State less complicated, a fully City funded project was chosen. City design is complete and under Caltrans review and right-of-way appraisals are being completed. Right-of-way acquisition was complicated by the extensive procedure required on State highways, but is still scheduled for September. The schedule for advertising for bids 1s subject to Caltrans per~ntt issuance. After original permit application submittal in August, 1989, Caltrans introduced major drainage and pavement redesign requirements which added considerable review and coawent time to the plan preparation. After the plan revision necessitated by these complex State requirements, a second plan check was submitted on April 16, 1990. Comments and/or approval of that plan submittal is overdue by six weeks in spite of claims that permit plans are now receiving a 45-dqy review. Regular calls to the Permit office have been made, but the delinquent reviewers are well Insulated from public contact. Continuing demands are being made at a digher level to free this project and the City Council will be kept informed of the progress made in this effort. Respectfully submitted, SB:PAR:1y d ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shlntu Bose, Deputy Ctty Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Status of Haven Avenue bus stop safety review a~3 . It is recommended that City staff and Omnitrans officials Jointly explore options for increasfng safety at Lhese bus stops and report to the City CourH;11 on September 5, 1990, with a recommended action. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council has directed that the bus stops an the west side of Haven Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Highland Avenue 6e examined further for the possiD11/ty of enhancing safety for bus patrons. At Tts August 1, meeting, the City Counctt reviewed all existing and planned bus stops on Naven Avenue and requested more stogy into Lhe stops adjacent to the open store drain. A meeting has been scheduled with Ommitrans to discuss bus routing options in further detail and to see if any City actions could help to making route modifications teasibte. Omnltrans may need time to develop such alternatives, but 1t is expected that a firm recommendation can be made on September 5, 1990. Respectfully submitted, ~T~a iOo"-' SB:PAR:Iy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 15, 1990 ='' T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ALL ZONING CHANGES BEING APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL All zone changes inu st comply with the provisions of Section 17.02.060 of the Development Code and be approved by the City Council, However, within the planned communities of Terra Vista and Victoria, there are provisions that allow the property owner to redesignate residential parcels to one density range above Tts original designs Linn (i.e., an "LM" parcel to "M" or an "M" parcel to "MH") without City Council approval. The Council would only encounter these redesigns Lions if an appeal is filed, if the Commission refers the matter to the City Council, or the property owner requests to increase the designation two density ranges (i.e., an "LM" parcel to "MH"). Attached for your information is Section 17.02.060 and the associated provisions of the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans. Respec submitted, ' Brad r ~ City P1 nner 88/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Development Code Section 11.02.060 Exhibit "B" - Excerpt Prom Terra Vista Community Plan Exhibit "C" - Excerpt from Victoria Comm~anity Plan pC~ELU'h'J~I CcDt Section 17.02.050 '~ Section 17.02.060 D. The Planning Commission shall base its decision upon meeting the Collowing findings: 1. The use in question is of a similar intensity to other permitted or conditionally permitted uses in the same district. 2. The use in question meets the purpose end intent o[ the district in which it is proposed. 3. The Use in question meete alto wnim`in5 .v ...~ npr'_`cc`_'.c a^vie and objectives of the General Plen. E. Determination. The determination of the Planning Commission by resolution sha^ be e~ ectiive ten (10) calendar days after the date o[ decision unless appealed to the City Council es prescribed in Section 17.02.080. Section 17.02.050 City Planter A. This title shall be administered by the City Planner whose responsibilities Cor this title include the Collowing funetiore to be carried out either directly or by subordinate employees: 1. Aoolication Process. Receive eM review all appieations for development pursuant to thts title. Processing includes the certification of completed applications; the establishment of a permanent tile; posting of public notices; collection o[ applicable tees; preparation o[ reports; processing of appeals; and presentation o[ stet[ reports to the Development Review Committees, Planning Commission and City Council. 9 IOf PI'OlrofPf llM. tOfPP01'Pf fhP nMVIVIMIG Rnd NdV14P LtIP. _Mlnhn On ItIP. requirements o[ this title. 2. Amendment. Initiate action [or amendment of this title where it is determined that such amendment would better implement the General Plan goals end objectives and increase its effectiveness end/or improve or clarity the contents of this title. 4. Permit Wuence. Issue permits under this title and certify that all such permits are till con[ormence with its requirements. 5. Coordinstlan. Rater end coordinate mettero related to the administration of th t t w th other egenelea and City depsrtments and provide information on the status of ell development permits. eeetlm 1l.0l.000 Aaastadmeota A. P~ur o e end Intent. This Section estaDliahea the procedures Cor emending district regulations ettd boundaries. The amendment process is necessary to provide consistency with the Development Code with the General Plan and state law, and to increase its eftectiveneas and clarity to implement the General Plan goals and objectives. Ex~ri,B.r i9 .ao~ -s- Section 1.02.060 B. Initiation 1. A change in the boundaries of any district may be initiated by the owner or the authorized agent o[ the owner of property by filing an application Por a district amendment as prescribed in this section. [[ the property [or which rezoning is proposed is in more then one ownership, all the owners or their authorized agents must join in tiling the application. 2. A change in the boundaries of any district or a change in the regulations may ho initiated by the mnaenaUS Of LhP City Plnnni,w CnmmiaaiM .u• City COUnCIl. C. Application 1. Application for amendments shall be filed with the Planning Division on a fors: prescribed by the City Pianner: 2. The City Planner may require additional information if necessary to enable the Commission to determine whether the change is consistent with the objectives of Nis Code and the City's adopted General Plan. 3. An application initiated by a property owner shall be accompanied by a fee established by the City Council. D. Concurrent AppUcatiom. An eppllcation for en amendment may be filed .conaarrently with any other application(s) as deemed appropriate by the City Planner, E. Public Henri The Planning Commission shell Hold a one public hearing on each ono w a district boundary chenae or for a chance N district regulations. The hearing shell be set end notice given es prescribed in Section 17.02.11G. F. Action by the Plannin¢ Commission. The Planning Commission shell state by resolution whether the change is consistent with the objectives of this Code and with the Generai Plan, and shall recommend to the City Council that the amendment be granted or granted in modified Corm. A decision to deny such request may De appealed to the City Council u prescribed in Section 17.02.080. G. Alternative Cleniticetion in Lieu of Pro d Classification. When the Commtae on eterm nos, o w ng a pub c ear ng on a pro lstrict boundary amendment flat a change to a dfstrict cleseiticatlan other then the proposed classification specified in the hearing notice Is desirable, the Commission may recommend en alternste cleasitlestion. The Commission must determine that the recommended alternative is mare approprlate for the subject property end is covistent wtth the General Plen end intent of the Development Code. Q it is more intense then the recommended altematfve a new public hearing is required. H. Action by the City Council 1. Within forty-five (45) calendar dsys otter the recommendation of the Plenning Commission to approve a district change, or if an appeal has been filed by the applicant or any other person prescribed in Section 17.02.080 the City Council shaLL hold at least one public hewing. The hearing shell be set end notice given as prescribed in Section 17.02.110. ~.p g -~- Section 17.02.070 2. Following the closi~ o[ a public hearing, the Council shell make specific [findings to whether the change is consistent with the objectivm o[ this ordinance end with the General Plan. I[ the Council finds that the change is consistent, it shall introduce an ordinance emending the District Nap or district regulations, whichever is appropriate. The Councll shall not modify a recommendation of the Planning Commission on a district change until it has requested and considered a report o[ the Commission on the modification. Failure o[ the Commission to report within forty-five (45) calendar days after receipt of the Council request shall be deemed concurrent. Hew Application Followir~Denisl. Followi~ the denial of en application for a change in dlsVtet Doundar:ea an application or request for the same or substantially the same change shall not be tiled within one year of the date o[ denial. J. Chen a in District Ma . A change in district boundarim shall be indicated by listing on the d strict map the number of the ordinance emending the district map. K. Pre-District. 1. For the purpose o[ establishing district regulations to become effective only upon annexation, property outside the corporate boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, within the sphere of influence, may be classified within one or more diatricb in the same manner snd subject to the same procedural requirements m prescribed fa' property within the City. 2. Upon passagge o[ en ordinance esteb4shing the applicable predistrict designation for property outside the City, the district map shell be revived to snow the potenusl or -prev~sa:er valaiu.cuuuu .v ucw~uc ~..~.:...~ ..,...~, annexation, and shall identify each district or districts applicable to such property with the label or "PRE-D44T RICT" in addition to such other map designation as may be epp6eable. section 17.02.070 Revidan/aloditidtiom A. Minor Revision -Administrative. Minor revisions or modification to approved s: to plans, concepiw grsding plans, conceptual landscape plans, or architectural plan may be approved by the Ciiy Planner. Minor revision end modifications shall be defined as and shall include the following: 1. Floor p4n ehangm which do not rmult in more then s ten (10) percent changes 2. Farking and cireu)ation eonftgurations whtch do not change the basic perking areas oe ciroulatlon concept (such e, relocating whole parldsq even from one area of the site to another or by adding pr deleting circulation nrees thst could have potential impacts to adjacent or surrounding properties); 9. OuUide building configurations which do not create a greater bulk, scale, or change in the line of sight; 4. Building placemenb which do not chatlge the general location end layout of the site; .~ n (0-7- L 7 u v ~.. E ~~ o c F a N v c 9 o a C ~ ] _N Q v o c 0 O y~ L ~ N a a L 2 a .], a .9 ~ X [ W Ui ] - E E m ~.- U a o v j v~ L O [ r L O O 1:. u ~i v a Cm 7~ OLL Vm ~CWC H C v ~~ °~ c E$ u s D a m'x o E 9 cD v 0 3 c a> c N ~~ ~m9°`~ ~mvc.'_mE ~J as OO m_U ~-aat ]u Lt C a u- a.~ > L U m L a N a m O a t' ] o u o L a a N E `c ,,, E.. LN ~ vNL. aL] a a yaniy~a .« iEO ~N o c ovoL•~aut PL Onm a« m c v L « ,9 ~ D u] U a~;~ J N q ...a c~ H y- c am E Y m E y E C~« w 'v,n3v~c-mac `n ate cE v E m m] o« N L vaa as n'D ma-co$ ° o «'JI F a V1 N L C L VI N~ L ~9 V[ a 61 n~ N '~ m fl ~ /i [ ~ - V 'r d ~DV~n~ .g Via.; ate: a > (0h VI V n~ L aY- L Ol .. a g C V« C O ] c c o A a'-> aN «yCCe«~O U S l° W U J D W[ N L C 3 4« N O N a y~ D y~ C] L ._ O rN `owe«E o.Q'Ecvu ~'^vag c w-° N° ~ g u aN+ o o~ o E ~ v 9 f~oamnNm N~o ua Eau- v~Ed ~~ L u L a o N C c u~ i c« o- D a] t a a O C C~ m N m~ h C N a a U m L a m a c~ N~ ] ~ N~ v a a.. O ~ « ~' O' ~ VI N u ~ y N C ~ ~` m ~ C ] ]~C ~ m m ofL~«NCCt E;LO ca n v~ _a ~ o ~_ v a o L A~_ l 9~ y= Y~~~~ `~ 'O W W c n` c u n> ~~ E c L;; N C~LC 0 '~ v ]aEt o ~ c D 3] v v o~ a v i~ ` L L =' L xwm>~Quvi >,~a~««oc~ a LE ]a o m ~~>. E ~ V1 > OJ 10 a ] l "> o n cE `o cv 3 m.. mx ~N m.N°nEmE c " v L q~Ea;~O4~gLmo«°c~ v E~~ L~ o a> a a a v ~ F c U L a .. L a m m o o«« E -vmmv v>au~mn ~+n va •rrivN >am >v v ~'OD umD._.D ~Cp~ yC«mmu ~ECEu wt'-.. .'.w O N-> ,[Q in o U ~L N O V .D F N 0 3 6~~ N ~ `~ > C L O m ~-D c>" a E uLa. m~ uL, n E rn= ] 3t N ° ._ N ~a :: v_v N„ vaoa._~N v ~c-E av o v ]t~- m «v av ~o> ~ v ~ vc mL«o.•o a cur.^c o ~L,_ E _ Nc.-L° t tv cvmou-'gDL ::xv ct0v `u c`° Ev N,F o`_.t o.. ~,`, .D UL~~«a ~m,-`a ~N m>C._ LNacga.+ V- Ina Aa9LW puN._ USLLpEyy.N+ A'O DOLC a ~ ~ t>o. ~ 't' voi d C v '° m .]. ; 0 c E v m C D y N y N d «h m C ~ a'-u3 ]QED OCag>`o v«c ~ a°y ]v«w~LC Na>v-°`o u ._. LO :?cN.. 'gF ~.~ acvm °cw~~oL mE"tgN° n~mcuL::u uEit ~-rn g Nuoc~~ENEd~ ~dE °c`>'« L« ~ '° S a~ o N; v Y '° W y« m ~ 9 ~'o L A S n~ o aNi E~~ ~N~E LL,n a?' ~ cL c L ~ L u c rnar- am'°a~DSy~caviov C sac][=F63]` nn..q~u~Nn C1~ v~«ma„_ ~t..~u~E.N. ~ "qu~E«m«y:..v HL Oa'Oy ~. a g~~ycN~ c9o:'.: C E'>°cNS]~~"L `o ~~ani v•°'u"• rn Nw- omuuN ~+ E du«.. Rout ~~ C 7 ._ ~>~ E L N 41 L c r v rna;N 3~L"'« a _ .N daa L LNO rya .'-ui 'yq ~~a~~~'dcaly a uu°~rnu~`o~y ~cuo'~u~ _YCU>VNN•~ 7q-_" K NL d.~C OO Ci 4~ aEu lu T A ro L~ d L C C p d d~ t t] L l L C G~ ~._ ~ t a N[ n ~ 0 u_nnac>>hwwr_L«a`~ ~ hu9pnuArvmc..~o haBomnh EXN/~~ !J b a U I L C I W L a '= c v._ v L v c .~E._ G ~.,~ m v ~ -° ~ v c v « v '- m a '~ L L ~ f4 « c E ~~ Z L a c ~ L E ~ ~ ° v v J ~ " i ~ a G; N C m o W U ~ J ry C N= m >.--" 3._ .a c~ ~ y o~ v c C _ ) _ y J ~ m r ~ J C V m_ a '; i' ~ ~ L Q- C W C ..- ~ R JL.L.O _ O - C « C r- W D ~ _ VI y~ E .i C .n 0 ap `%I `1 C N ~ ~ S U N v W_ ~ L In 7r J~ C-«S] T O - F u • T" ~ c J c c m W ~ ~.A+ «l o c J W ,.~. E 29:_ Ga v c ~ L" o ~ L '~ v m E y ~`O 1«~V ODU~ a~-~p W W Lv1vmN •LV>c N-' I m We __«_ W U ~- ho~«LOO~ ~uL-mvE,W Y. m. LL... ,, 3 y L 0+- v n o N '; _ a c L J T c ~N 3 «« ^ > a~ c c N T« t y ~ o m '-" o' J^ u° w o~° c o«~ ~ u °c ~' c uFL-«d« `~._ jo~~omo W ~vWIE~ mN« G `°-ay3 '°no; ale Lrmc~~JO Lo 's c'c u ~3v~;gds,«:~~~`o,=' a°''c~',`,a!°mcLVO3CIW Lso oc JvE~c«ac3 v W LfA wy=:D W~«'a «cL cm ila4 'm inL 41r Lva ~L ~ '~w«. Jym •O_1o uYm-'L tC~~aOf9 `.«~ T«'mEo_Y O T~ O~ 9 L N Q~g «_ Y E~ O LL~ U E d L C L L~~ '^ 1~ G L d 1 9 'O O m U C ~ Y L O. ~~ 6 W W C' U G W~ 7 fi~L W ~'U I,N,«r'~aL pA L_u mL>:~~aLET~«~a C ~NminLCC O'rO aGU'OL ya~Cmy«xL mmoL gEN«•'=aoo o.w°.v cyw n~« NO«;n°G '.~-.~ur'~E'o'W`o Ed u«W'mJ WWO.«h gc uwC ~'«.~li W ,~ N n >-'L' ~' „ •~ '-V'I GCl 'L"' •~ y o U- Q G C~? C J U O 7 L yLw=CNCyN U"Sq CaINLLOpLp NQI Cm MVY VG h'm« OU OaCmL mQ m. d..N 6«aLr=C 06C mw N N N N ~ /i 9 N N N N C v ^~ m o+ ~ c ` 'Ji •A N N 411 0. v v v v a ~ ~ i W i W >~ L L m _ W :1 W W C ~ ~ ' ' W c c W~ j ~ J a V J ~ N C N C W C ~ ~ 4i °- o E G3 ram C udi ~ m0 V q+ ~'a c' J rn -~ ~ v ~' ~ ~ ~ V q L uWi C ~ ;i vai ~ W ~~ ~ J 7 C C.L. ~ ~ c L ~ A o O n 9~ q ~= U rn S J x ~ $- ] 1~, ~_ ~_ 2 x o_ 9 O 1 1- C r L E •,~ W c u W q C W V U m > NO C N ~ C N C J m L _ O 1 L W « T'~ ~ E ~ v E c c A~ ~ a N t d O '- C - W N O~ i, m n o m 7 ~ ~ N La ~~ N mad f. ro o C j. N[ L I~ (0 I 'a VI N T I L W L J- L N O m C N'~ VI t VI L L y~ e cam 1~ mm NI-J unm m W LL VI + VI n ~_ 'n 41 Q ~ 9 u~ ~ E A v 1 >~ i 'e ~ :. occc~L'~-cavaU m'uIm2~J y ~ ~ L « ~ d q W L« U o=« y C .m ~ ~ W~ U C. U P U N U m m~ a N W y; O' «~« v m ~` W ~.- m C W L L V O O u u TLy'O 'L-'CL dC N C 1V m«'~ 01 w.~« E q m9 W~.~ «9~~ WmEc o'pK ~~'"U~vd uU~oL.«~v qq J y O n ~ d O _V ' 7 S T E; a m Y V C W L v~ N s ~V W W L L L L N r r n G L W u mJcyyca~> ~acc°mcc.,,u l W D W N L ~' O N Npp r ~i C« N [« m W.L. wL acW Gjd~« W.T.C c C Ap~ N m« 7 y L Q .~. « N m S U;> amNL m-°~EC~nm~a«a=~.r ti 2~g VICYufi0. C:ohVMtulli~ {~'~ FLEXIBILITY IN MANAGING THE,PLAN Sn the tuture, conditions may arise that suggest rearrangements in the Land IIse Plan designations Cor individual sub-planning areas as shown on the Land IIse Plan and the Density Distribution PLan. The Community Plan is designed to provide Clexibility in trading the cssident+_a1 densities in one sub-planning area for densities in other sub-mlanninq areas to be developed in the tuture. The Community Plan must also accommodate change caused by political, economic, or market conditions, without "_ ---tall aCCnc:i the bi "' y ng a lity t construct the total J!ctoria cos®unity. 9y utilizing theVOp eimum yield Anmroach in determining residential densities, such Clexibility can occur within the design intent o! this Community ?lan without changing'either the character and quality o! each village. or the fetal number et un+*. r..+~..« c.i •cc - - Ccmmunity Plan Area. ':aeh Village can accommodate some change by increasing oc decreasing the n~ber o! residential dwelling units in that v!llag• without altering the intent o! this plan. Accordingly,-the Optimum Yield Approach allows a landowner, within certain limitations, to redesignate eh• Land Dse Plan designations too sub-planning areas he owns. 2n ether words, a landowner may increase the number of dwelling units in one sub-planning area i! he decreases the number o! dwelling units in another sub-planning area he awns as long as ha maintains the total number of dwelling units assigned by the Density Disezibutton Plan to his property. Additionally, density can be transferred tram one landowner to another by mutual agreement, pcovided that ocher ~ ~.w.nf. .Y in _f 1. !.. 1.4:_ M _- To proofde flexibility which maintains the integrity of the Community Plan and which promotes the geala and desires o! the Ciey of aaneho Cucamonga, the following guidelines shall apply to the transfer a! density within the Community ?tan Area. 1. Th• number o! dwelling unlts proposed on the Density Distribution Plan may be Lnereased for any sub-planning area. Howwer, such incrusts should not alter the intent o! this plan to provide a variety o! cesidential housing types and densities throughout each village and the entire Community Plan Area. Additionally, the numDet of units proposed Coe any subplannigq area nay .e deersased without a corraspondinq increase in another subplanning area. X09 ,ae ~iC~r~a lamrnan~~ P~Am 2. The Land 9se Plan designation Eor any sub-planning area may be redesignated as follows: a. "L" Land Dae designations can be redesignated to "LM" land use desighations for any sub-planning area. b. "LM" land use designations can be redesignated to ~'. ther _ "M" •`!°" '_and cse designation for say sub-planning area. e. "M" land use designations can be redesignated to "MH" land use designations for any sub-planning area. d. "N18" land use designations can.be redesignated to "H" land use designations .for any sub-planning area. 3. In order to provide flexibility in the development of the Victoria planned Community over the 10-15 year life of the Plan, a maximum of 209 variation in the optimum yield may be allowable. Any and all variations shall be reviewed and aproved by the Design Review Committee. The variation in the number of dwelling unite within one village may require corresponding decreases in one or more of the other villages to insure thnt the total uuudo~ uiu :n - lG. "..C~a- ..-.~ ... ..`.i t`: .^l. .d Community boundary. ~~0 197 x ~`' ~'a