Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/04/06 - Agenda PacketPAGE City Council Agenda April 6, 1988 All itm n~bnitted for the City Conneil Agenda coat be in meriting. the deadlin¢ for anbaittie; these itm is 5:00 p.^, on the Wedaeaday prior to the nentieg. Yha City Clerk's Office receives all anch itm. s. cau. to o>rBCR 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Piag. 2. Roll Cell: Brow _, Buquet _, Stout _, Ring _, end Wright E. A/M(IOMCl~EB/pR68Qr1YI0Po 1. Preeentetiw of proc laaution deelar ing the veek of April I1 - 16, 1988 as "finek of the Young Ch ild^ in Rsmoho Cucamonga. 2. Presentation of proclaautioa des luring the aonth of April, 1988 ea "Rarihquake Preparedness Month" in Rancho Cucamonga. C. COrBQI CALR~t ~uv iviw~ina wvaevc eaiwdar icaas ara azpaccav co va routine and aoa-coatro~ettial. Yhay mill M acted opon 67 the Comeil at ow tit arithoat diaewaiw. Aay its nay ba revved by a Coaaeils„eabar or tier of tho andiamoe Eor diacau ion. 1. Approval of Minutes: Pebruary 16, 1988 March 2, 1988 March 12, 1988 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Mo's. 3/16 /88, 3/23/88, ~ and 3/30/88, and Payroll ceding 3/17/88 Eor the total amount of $2,062,270.64. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investaent 17 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Bchedulc sa cf Yazch 28, 1488. ~ 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General, 26 Poothill Liquor, Janus Lee, Song and Lynda Runkyung, 8161 W. Poothill Boulevard. ~. P4GE i ~oe~ai ~ ~~ i' Ci[y Council Agenda /~~%`+ /% April 6, 1988 2 5. Approval to ezeeute Contract Change Order No. 4 (CO 86- 23 ~ 042) to Assoc feted Engineers in the amount of $6,000.00 for design of concrete reservoir south of Hillside Road ! ! weer of Archibald Avenue to be pe id from Syeteme ~ Development Peee, Account No. 22-4637-8748 bringing the contract total [o $28,054.53. I ~ j 6. Approval to execute Contract Chance Order No. 2 (CO 87- 30 020) for a prole eaioaal sere ices agreement with Don ! Greek and Associates [o continue design adminie [ration reports for the Eonyan Street Ex to anion and Channel Crossing of Alte 'Loma Creek to he funded from the Systems Dev_lopmet Pund, Account No. 22-4637-8734. It is recommended to expand their contract by $5,000.00 to bring their total to $13,799.50. I 7. Approval to award and ezecu to pro feeeional services jz agreement (CO 88-040) with GPS Consulting Civil Bngineere to prepare plane, epee ificatione and eetimatee ~ for the improvement of Beech 1B, weterahed V (Alta Lom Storm Drain) for a fee of $23,315.00, to be paid from AD 84-2 Punde, Account No. BO-4637-6028. 8. Approval to award and execute profs ea Tonal services 37 ! i agreement (W SS-04i) with Linv fife Civ ii SngineereiLend Surveyors, Inc. to prepare plane, epee ifitetione and e e[imete for Ninth S[reec Pavement Reh ebilitetion harwe a.. Aa4a. Aoa a„a .ad w:aav..d Aoa...... •~ h. F..nAa.t ~ ~ i by Syeems Development, Account No. 22-4637-8747. RSS OLOTIOH N0. 88-167 3fl A HRSOLUTION OP THB CITY COONCII. OP THB ! CITY OF BANCHO CHCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, TO i ANARD AND BERCUTR A PBOPR33IONAL SBRVICRS A GR88MR NT NITH LINVILLR CIVIL HNGIN8RR3/LAND SIJRVRY0R3, INC. OP RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORN79 TO PREPARB PLANS, SPECIPICATION3, AND RSTIMATB POR NINTH ST RBET PAVR MR NT HBHABILITATION AND {fIDBNING PROJECT BBTNBBN eAi018 AVBNU6 AND VINBYABD AVeHUB 9 Approval of Lease Agreement (CO 88-042) with Cucamonga gg Councy Geter Dietr ict for placement of radio equipment et the Dietric tie re ee rvoir ei to at 4822 Archib eld Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. t~ ~ - PAGE F ~a`?/~ ~ City Couacil Agenda mm y`bd April 6~ 1988 3 10. Approval [o execute Professional Services Agreement q5 (88-043) with 3.P, Davidson Aaeoc is[ea~ Iac.~ for design of traffic signal and street impravemen[e et the intersection of Pootb ill Boulevard and Rncheetez Avenue. i Improvesente rill also include etorr drain conetruc tion~ ~ utility relocations and zightrof-way engineering. i 11. Approval to arard the contract for the Slurry Seal B6 Program, Pbace I, fie tal ynar 1987-88, Die tricte 1 [hru ~, 9 se show on the attached mspe~ to IPS Servicee~ for ~ the amunt of $85 X782. 10 to be fu¢ded from SH 300 Punde~ accowt number 15-4637-8050. 12. Approval to release Real Property Improvement Contract q9 and Lien Agreement (CO 88--044) for Pareel 1 of Parcel Nap 6911, located ^C 10955 Arror Boater submit tad by Nel[er H. Heller Pac [or'e Incorporated. BHBOLIIPION N0. BB-168 50 A BHS0LOTI011 OP TBe CITY COONCIL OP T08 ~ CITY 01 BAHCHO CDCAMONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ BELBAS IHC A REAL PROPERTY I1~HOVHMEBT CONTRACT AHD LIEN AGBBENEIR PROM HALTER E. HELLE$~ PACTOB, INCORPORATED 13. Approval to release Improvememt Agreeaent and 52 i Improvement Securities for Trsct 13057. loss red nn ~h. ~, sou three[ corner of Highland and Pairmnt Avanuee~ submitted by the Pie ldstoee Coapaay. BHSOLPIIOA H0. 88169 53 i '~~ A BBSOLOTTOE OP T~ CITY CWHCLL OP TBB CITY OP HAHCHO COCAMONGA~ CALIYORNIA~ RELHASING IMPROVEMENT AGREH HE HT AHD IMPBOVEMENT SECORITY POR TRACT 13057 14. Approval to ezecu[e Improvement Agreements and 5q Improvement Security for DR 87-16, located on the rest Bide of Htigode Avenue eout6 of Poothill Boulevard, eubsitted by General Te lephoae Covpany of California. i . i . ~ vCJ ~ PAGE /°c~s~~~~~ City Council Agenda m m e% a Apr ii 6, 1988 4 HBSOLOTION N0. 88-170 55 A HHSOLUTION OP TBH CITY COONCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO CIICAMONGA~ CALIPOeNIA~ APPHOV ING INYHOVSMENT AGBHHMHNTS AND INPHOVHNHNT SH COHITY POH DHVHLOP NHNT BHVIHW 87-16 15. Approval to ezecute Naps Improvement Agreement and 6/ Improvenen[ Security for Tract 12870, located on the north aide of Highland Ave¢ue~ between 8tiwanda end East Avenuee~ subsil tad by Safi Javid~ AAN Inveetmea tee A California General Pnr tnerehip end NADPT~ A California Limited par [nereh ip. RHSOLDTION N0. 88i 11 5E A H68OLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCLL OY THH CITY OP BANCHO COCAMONGA~ CALIPOBNIA~ APPROVING IHY ROVHlIH NT ACHHHM6NTS~ IMPHOVHlHiNT SBCUHITY~ AND PINAL NAP OP ~ TRACT N0. 12870 16. Approval [o ezecute Improvement Agreesent and 60 Imp revemenY Security for 8152 Ninth 9treet~ submitted Sq oecar Nexe. HBSOLDTION N0. 88172 61 A BHSOLOTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP TBB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIPOHNIA~ APPROVING INPBOVBlD3NT AGHHH NH NT AND INPHOVHMBNT SB CDHITY FOH 8162 NINTH I STBHHT 17. Approval to ezecute Improvement Agreement a¢d 63 Improvement Security for Trac t• 12802-2, -5 end -fi (Off- eite Storm Drs in)~ located eset of Spruce Avenue end south of Mounla in View Drive, eubmittnd by Lewis Hoses of California. BESOLOTION N0. 881 73 64 i A eHSOLUTION OP TH$ CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CDCANONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ APPROVING IMP80VHMHNT AGHHBNHNT AND INPBOIBMHNT SBCOHITY POH TRACTS 12802-2, -5 AND -6 PAGE ° ?/~.~° Ci[y Council Agenda ~m`m'y~'f// April 6, 1988 5 18. Approval to ezecute Improvement Agreement Ezteneion for 66 C11P 85-I b, Located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street, submitted by Huller Company. BSSOLOTION N0. 88-174 57 A BESOLiITION OF TNH CITY COONCIL OF TBe CITY OP BANCEO CUCANONGA, CALIPOSNIA, APPBOV ING INP80V81lBNT AGBEBNSNT B%TENSION AND INP80v8HENT SEC08ITY P08 CUP 85-14 l9. Approval to ezecute Improvement Agreement Ezteneioa for 68 ~. Tracts 10927, 10827-1, 1082?-2 and 10827-3, located on Meozanita Drioe between 8ermoea Avenue sad Neven Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by 8elco, Industries. i BE60LUfI0N N0. 88.175 69 A BHSOLDTION OP TB6 CITY COONCIL OP THB CITY OP BANC80 COCAMONGA, CALIFOeNIA, APPBOFING IMPe0v816NT AG888N6NT BETENSION AND INP80V8N8AT SSC08ITY P08 TRACT NOS. 10827, 10827-I, 10827-2 AND 10827-3 20. Appxovel to execute Improvement Agreement Ezteaaion for 70 Tract 11932, located on [he soutb Bide of Pinch Avenue at Bando la 3[reeq submitted by 0.T.[., Incorporated. i BESOLOTION NO. 88-178 71 ' A BSSOLDTION OP 1'N8 CITY C0187CIL OF T~ CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA~ CALIPOBNIA, APP80VING INPBOVg18NT AG88BN8NT B%3'BNSION ' AND INPROVBMBNI SECDBITY P08 TBACf 11932 21. Approval to accept a Grant Deed for Spruce Avenue Park. 72 22. Approval of a loan (CO 88-045) in the amount of 73 $8,000.00 at en interest rate of eight percent (e S) to be repaid within forty-eight (48) months for relocation costa incurred by Community Services Manager. 23. Approval [o eeteb lieh a r. oryn account is the Syeteme ~ 76 ' sieve iopment Puna for eeg rega[ion of available fund balance. 24. Approval of proposed sale of bonds for development of 77 Fire pro[ertion tac ilitiea. P J ,,,~~~~~/ PAGE / eo~/e>~j City Couneil Agende 0`e a i~3 April 6, 1988 6 25, Approval of pegmeat (CO 88-046) not to ezceed $6,000 For 79 Absorption Study for proposed Community Pac ilitie• Diatric t~ Htiwaada Highlands (88-1) from funds deposited with the Ci[y by [he Caryn Company. 26. Approval to au [hor its the advertising of the "Notice 85 Inviting Bide" for [he Bed Hill Perk Na intenence Building Improvement Project, funded from Capital Improvements Paciiities~ Account No. 01-4647-7043. $HSOLDIION NO. 88^177 36 A BHSOLDTIOH OP THZ CITY CODNCII. OP THH CITY OP RANCHO COCAMONGA~ CALIPOBNIA~ APP$OVING PLANS AND SPBCIPI CATIONS POfl THB "BBD 0211 PASL MAINIBHANC$ BDILDING"~ IN SAID CITY AND AOTHO$IZ ING AND DIflBCTING THH CITY CLBfl[ TO A.^VEBTISH TO flES8IV6 BIDS 27. Approval to authorize the advertia iog of the "Notice 90 Inviting Bide" for [he Lion Street Bxtenaion portion of she City Corporation Yard Improvement Projec[~ located south of 9th 9treet~ to be funded by Civic Pacility- Account No. 72-4285-b028. flH80LDTI0N N0. BBi78 91 A NB80LOTION OP THB CITY CGDNCIL 01 THB CITY OP RANCHO CBCANONGAi CALIPOflNIA~ APPflGPING PLANS AND 9PBCIPT CATIONS PO$ THH "LION STflHBT BiT$NSION SOUTH OP 9TH STRHHT"~ IN SAID CITY AND AHTHOHI2ZNG AND ~ DI86CTINC THIS CITY CLBfl[ TO ADVB$TIBH TO B$f8IV6 BIDB 28. Approval to confirm City Council action oe October 21, 96 1987 with regard to Tract Po. 13541 (Allmark)~ which is located north of fled Hill Country Club Drive and east of Valle Vista on Sierra Vista Drive. i ~ ~ PAGE +°+° °~ ~ City Comcil Ageeda ePm' /3 April 6, 1986 7 RESOLUTION N0. 88179 97 A 88SOLOTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCII. OP THH CITY OP BANCHO CUCANONGA~ CALIPOANIA~ CONFIRMING CITY COIINCIL ACTION ON OCfOBHfl 21, 1987 NLTH BHGA$OS TO TflACf NOS. 13541 (ALLMAHE)~ NHICH IS LOCATHD NORTH OP AHD HILL COlD7fRY CLUB DRIVES EAST OF PALLS VISTA OU SIEERA VISTA DEIYE 29. Approval to concur with staff's decision to establish I 100 "No Stopping Anytime Zone" oa Baee Line Aoad be[veen the vest city limits and Milliken Avenue. 30. Approval to modify the unit amount far fees in lieu of 101 undergrounding ez ie Ling overhead electrical lines. RESOLUTION N0. 8880 107 A 86SOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA~ CALIPOANIA~ RHSCINDINC ABSOLDTIOM R0. 87-2b5~ AND BSTABLISHING A flEVISED SCBBDULE DP PEES IN LIHU OP UNDBRGROUNDINC HEISTING I OVBAHEAD UTILITY LINES NON RBQUIflHD BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL 31. Approval to support the Zone 1 Flood Control Project 10.9 [CLVCLLy YLV L. RESOLUTION N0, 88181 110 A A650LOTIOM OP THE CITY CWRCIL OP TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIPOBNIA~ SUPPOflTING T~ 20NB 1 PROJECT PRIORITY LIST 32. Approval to participate ie [he Nest Hed Solid Naate Alterentives Coalition (WHSNAC) program. I i i PAGE 2 ~o''~oa ri ~ City Couec it Agenda /5~~ April 6, 1988 8 BHSOLUTION N0. 88-182 I11 A 8630LOTION OP THH CITY COIH7CII. OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOHNIA, S UPPOBTING NEGOTIATIONS BET WBHN THB COUNIISS OF SAN BHHNAHDII70 AND RIVERS ZDE POB U3B OP HIVE HS IDS COUNTY LANDPILL SITES AND ENCOURAGING THB FORMATION OP A ~ JOINY POi8iH3 AUTHUHITY POB THB PURPOSE OP MANAGING REGIONAL SOLID WASTB DISPOSAL 33. Approval Co ac ca pt irprovemente, release bonds and file e notice of coopletioa for: DR 85-38 - loco tad on the southeast cornet of Archib eld 112 Avenue end Seventy Street. Paithtul Perforaunce Bond (Street) $27,000 SESOLVPION N0. 88183 113 A RESOLOTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCII. OP TflE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH6 PUBLIC IMPROVEMNTS POH DH ~ 85-38 AND ADTHORIZING THE PILING OP A i NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR TH6 MORE wa a/-32 - located w the northeast corner of Archibald 11G Avenue and Pour[6 Street. Faithful Perfaruance Bond (Street) $18,000 ~ HBSOLUTION N0. 9Bi 84 115 A HESOLOTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF08NIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IlBROVBMHNTB POR 1H)R 87-31 AND AUTHORIZING THB PILING OP A NOTICE 08 COMPLETION POR TIR YORR DH 87-02 - located at 9500 Santa An its Aaeaue, north of ;;~, ' Pourih Streec Paithtul Rerforuance Bond (S tree[) $15,000 PAGE i +' a` ~ • Ci[ Comcil A ends m`°e'h .ti dr 7 Apri16~g1988 9 EBSOLIR'ION N0. 88-185 117 A BHSOLDTION OP THB CITY COONCIi. OP T88 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIPOHNIA~ ACCEPTINC THH PUBLIC IMPBOPBIffiNTS FOB D8 87-02 AND AOTHOHIZING TH6 PILING OF A NOTICB OP COMPLETION POH THE WOHR I Tract 11606 - located on 19th Street between Havea 113 Avenue end Deer Creek He lease: Faithful Perforaaace Boad (Street) $554,000 (Storn Draia) $ 84,000 Accept: Maintemnca Gmrantee Bond (Street) $ 55,400 (Storms Dre in) $ 8,400 BHSOLDTIOtl NO, BBi86 Il9 A HHSOLUTION OP THB CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALLPOHNIA~ ACCEPTING TH6 PUBLIC IMPHOVBlD1NTS POH THACE 11606 AND AOY90HI2ING TH6 FILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POH ThE WOHH Tract 12238 - located on the northveac corner o'_ flell~an 120 avenue ena ~nurco acres[ Heleaae: Feithful Performnca Sond (Street) $465,400 Accept: Main[enence Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 46,540 RESOLUTION N0. 88-187 1?1 A HBSOLOYIOII OP TflB CITY CODNCIL OP THH CITY OP HANCBO COCANONCd~ CALIPOBNIA~ ACCEPTING TH6 PUBLIC IMPROVBMB NTS POE TRACT 12238 AND AVTHOHIZING TBE PILING OP A MOTIC6 OP COl0?LETION POH Tfl6 WORK I I 34. Set public beer ing for May 4, 1988 - Approval of a 122 ~ ~ __ _ _ing - Heap"vortion::an[ Ha port for - ator~u draie~(Aaaaasoan[ Dis tric[ 86-2) for the lot line ~ adjns tmeat Eor APN 201-271-71, APM 201-271-72, and Tract Nap 12873, and giving prelisimry approval. -4 Y~ ~ ~" ~ PAGE 0 /~%~~ ~ City Council Agenda ee y`.f3/ Apri16~ 1988 10 i RHSOLOTION NO, 88188 123 A RESOLPTION OP TBB CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OP EANC80 CUCANONGA~ CALIPOeNIA~ PA331NC ON flBAPPOflTIONMENT HEPOflT FOH THB BTOHN DHAIN (ASSHSSMBNT DISTEI Cf 86-2) POB THE LOT LING ADJUSTI~NT POfl APN 201- 271-71~ APH 201-271-72~ AND TflACT MAP 12873, GIVING PR6LIMINANY APPflOVAL~ AND SETTING THE DATB OP PUBLIC BHAEING P08 MAY 4, 1982 35. Set public hearing for Nay 4, 1988 - Approval to annex 125 Tract No. 12870 and D8 H7-16 to Street Lighting Nn inteneace Die tr ict No. 1 as Annexation No. 41. flB80LI7fION N0. 88189 126 A HSSOLPIION OP THE CITY CODNCTL OP TBB CITY OP HANCHO CDCAMONCA~ CALIPOHNIA~ OY PBELIMINAHY APPflDVAL OP CITY 6NGIMBBfl'8 HHPOflT POfl ANNHIATION M0, 41 TO STHBET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DTBTAICf N0. 1 BESOLffTION NO. 98190 133 A HHSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP HANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIYOHNIA. ~ DHCLAflING ITS INTENTION TO 08DEfl THH ANNBEATION TO STfl88T LIGHTING MAII7TENANC6 DISTEICT N0. 1, AM ASSESSMENT DISTBICTt DESIGNATING SAID ANNEIATION AS ANNBHATION N0, 41 TO STB68T LIGHTIPC lL1INTBNANCH ~ DISTEICT N0. 1, PDESUANT TO THH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPPEYINC A TI1R AND PIAC6 FOR HBABING OH,TECTIOlIS TffiflST0 36. Set public hearing for May 4, 1988 - Approval to annez 135 Tract No. 12870, located o¢ the north side of Highland Avenue between Etivands and Saat Avnnaea to Street Lighting Maintenance Dia[riet No. 2 ae Annaza[ioa Ho. 7A. _.. ~ m m ~ jac 3` /%%` ~~%~ PAGE City Cou¢c it Ageoda April 6, 1988 I1 RESOLUTION N0. 8891 136 A RESOLUTION OP T1~ CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO COCANOBGA, CALIPOBNIA, OP PHBLININARY APPROVAL OF CITY HNGINSBB'S REPORT P08 ANN81(ATIOH N0, 26 TO STHHeT LIGHTING MAINTeNANC6 DISTRICT NO. 2 R830LU1'ION NO. 88192 142 A HSSOLDTION OP Tt18 CITY CODNC ZL OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOHNIA, DECLARING ITS INTHNTIOH TO ORDBH THB ANNS%ATION TO STBBBT LIGHTING NAINTBNANCB DISTRICI N0. 2, AN ASSeSSIBBT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNB%ATION AS ANNBEATION N0. 26 TO STe88T LIGHTING NAIHTENANCB DLSTRI CT N0. 2, PUH90ANT TO TH8 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPPSRING A TINE AND PidCB POR SHARING OSJBCTIONS TH8RST0 37. Set public hearing for ILy 4, 1988 -Approval to done: 144 Tract No. 12870 located on the ¢orth aide OF Highland ~ Avenue between Etiwenda Gateway Moaumente and Heat Avenue eed Archibald Avenue to Landscape Nnintena¢ce Die tric[ No. 1 ns Anne:atioc No. 44 HSSOLUTION NO. 88393 I 1-05 A HBSOLOTION OP TH8 CITY COIINCII. OP TH8 CITY OP BANCHO COCAMONCA, CALIPORNIA, OP FHBLTMIRAHY APPROVAL OP CITY BHGIN88H'S I ~ ' RSFOBT FOH ANNSRATION N0. 44 TO STRBHT LIGHTII7C MAINTENANCE DiSTHICT N0. 1 I 8880LOTIOM N0. 88194 151 A RHSOLUTION OP TB8 CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP BANCHO CUCANONGA, CALLPOHNIA, DECLARING ITS INTHMTIOM TO 08D6R TH8 i ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTBNAHCB ~ DISTRICL NC. i, AN A88%88HSN'I DISTRICT: i I DBSI(27ATING SAID ANMB%ATIOM AS AMNB%ATION NO. 44 TO LABDSCAPS MAINTBNAN(8 DISTRICT N0. 17 PURSUANT TO THB LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OPPBRINC A TI1ffi AND PIdCE POH HBAHIN6 OBJECIION9 THBH8T0 ~% ~y a s`/g/~ i / /// ~/~ PAGE City Council Ageada April 8r 1988 12 38. Set public hearing for Nay 4r 1988 Approval to annez 153 DB 87-16 located east of Htiwanda Aveeuer north of Arror Route to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 ee Aanezation No. 18. RESOLUTION N0. BBi 95 15R A RESOLUTION OP THH CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfAr CALIPOflNIAr OP PeHLIMINAAY APPROVAL OP CITY HNGINBHfl'3 RBPORT POH ANNHSATION N0. 30 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT H0. 3 RESOLUTION N0. 88-196 160 A H850LIITION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY 08 RANCHO CUCANONGAr CALIPORMIA~ DHCLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDHR THB ANREYATION TO LANDS CAPB MAlNTBNANCH DISTRICT N0. 3r AN ASSSSSNBNf DISTRICft DHSIGRATING SAID ANNEEATION Ag ANNHEATION NO. 10 TO LANDSCAPH MATNTHNANCH DISTRICT N0. 3, PU890ANT TO THA LANDSCAPIRG AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFFERING A TIIffi AND PI~C3 FOA BWAIRG 08JEC7'IONS THeBETO 39. Set public hear iog for Nay 4r 1988 - Approval to eanez 162 I Dfl 87-16 lnret.d seer ..F RH.....a. a......_. ..y ..F a- Ro~[e to Street Lighting Maintenance Die trier No. 6 as Annezetion No. 14. i I HBSOLUTION NO. 88i 97 ~ '.63 A BBSOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMON(Ar CALYPOBNIAr OP PHBLIMNARY APPROVAL OP CITY ENCINBHR'3 RHPOflT POR ANNHiA1'ION N0. 14 TO ST888T I LIGHTING MAINTERANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 1 vU PAGE c `~ /, °/~° City Council Agenda m e ~n`!.k3 April 6, 1988 13 /~,° /~ HeSOLDTION N0. 88i 98 169 A HBSOLDTION OP THH CITY CODNCIL OP THH CITY OP RANCHO CDCANONCA~ CALIPOHNIA~ DSCLABING ITS INTENTION TO OHDSH THH ANNeXATION TO STHEHT LIGHTING MAINTBNAN(E DISTBICf N0. 6, AN ASS838lBNT DISTHICf: i D85IGNATING SAID ANNH%ATIDN AS ANNH701TION i N0. 14 TO STB88T LICHTZNC MAINTHNANCH D ISTBICT N0. 6, PDHSDANT TO TflH LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OPPH RING A TIla; AND PLACH POH HSAHING OHJBCTIONS THBHHTO 40. Set public hearing Eor Nay 4, 1988 - An appeal of the 171 March 9, 1988 Planning Cosie eion approval of a time exteoeion for Tents Give Tract No. 12332 located on the seat Bide of Haves Avenue north of [he Hillside Drainage Channel (Deer Canyoo Drive). D. COe38gS OIDIWCtB She folloviog Ordinances have had pmblie haaringa at thn tine of first reading. Second raadiogs era expected to be routine sad non-coatrovevial. They will ba acted npon by the Council at ow liar vithoat discussion. She City Clerk d leeLLealnn. None aubnitted. H. ADVHHSIBHD tODLIC HtAHIA® She folloming iteu have been advertised and/or posted as pnbl ie hearings as required by lp. She chair Bill open the meet iag to receive public testinoey. 1, PAHIANCS 87-18 - HONG PBDeHAL - Tye appeal of the 173 Planning Coveie aion s d~ec ieioa deny iag • request to allw the sign copy to iac lode the vord ^Anytimeteller" oa iiiJ (2) aer faces of eriatinH re it •igne i.nnared at i 9596 Baee Line Hoad. PAGE City Count it Agenda April 6, 1988 ~ I4 2. ST BHHT NAMH CHANGES FOH THHHA VISTA PA$KWAY AND ELM 192 AVB NUS - A propoeel [o deeigne to Neet Terra Via [a Parkvep and Enat Terra Via to Parkway aad to deaigmte bleat Elm Avenue with the Tarra Vie to Ple¢ned Communi ey. S [e Ff report by Chria Neetmanr Aae ietaat Plainer. (Continued from 3/lb/88 meeting) BESOLUTION N0. 88-199 212 ~ I ~ I A RP>SOLUTION OP T~ CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCAr CALIFOHNIAr f CHANGING TH8 MANE OP TERRA VISTA PARKWAY TO EAST TB HHA VISTA PARKWAY AND NEST TS RRA VISTA PARKWAY AND ESTABLISHING NILLIRBN AVENUE AS TH& DIVIDING INTHH36CTTON HBSOLPTION N0. 88-200 214 A BSSOLUT'ION OP THB CITY COIUNCIL OP THE CITY OP R61PCH0 CUCAMONGAr CALIPOBNIAr CHANGING TH8 NA!! OP HLN AV8NU6 WEST OP ~ SPHOC6 AV8NU6 TO NBST 8LN AVBHUE 3. AtffiNDl~NT OF TRACT MAP N0. 10827-2 -Located in the 216 victoria Planned Community, s¢d submit ted by Mira Mar 1 Land Company, I¢eorporatedr a Cali Foraia Corporatio¢r a Delawre Corporation. f H830LUYION N0. 88-201 217 A BESOLUTION OP THB CZTY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP BANC$0 CUCAMONGAr CALLPORNIAr APPflOVINC AiHtNDIMG MAP TRACT N0. 10817-2 4. OHDBRING THH WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANHEb1TION NO. 16 POH D8 87-31 LOCATED NORTH OP 4TH 219 STHBBT AND WEST OF LUCAS BANCH HOAR TO LANDSCAPH MAINTHNANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 H880LUTION N0. 88,202 220 HESOLuiiOW Or THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFOHHIAr OHDBAINC THH WOHB IN CONNECTION KITH ANN88ATION N0, 15 TO LANDSCAPE lNINTBHANCB DISTHICf N0. ~ AND ACCHPTING T88 PZNAL HNGIti68R'9 66POHT POH DH B7-31 fi ~~ U , PAGE i` a/w •°i~~ City Council Agenda m``e' ~;'t 3% April 6. 1988 15 E. ANNE&1TION NO, 2 POB TACT NOS. 13557, 13562. AND 226 13559 (CARYN) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTBNANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 BESOLOTION N0. 88403 227 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COONCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CAIIPO~YIA~ ~ OBDBRING THE WORR IN CONNECTION WITH ANHEEATION NO. 2 TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S BEPOBT POR TRACT NOS. 13557 13562 AND 13559 C, ANNEYATION N0. 39 POB DB 87-31. TRACT NOS, 13557. 234 13562 AND 13559 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRI C[ NO, 1 BHSOLCPION N0. 88404 235 A HBSOLUTION OP THE CITY COOVCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANOVGA~ CALIPORNIA~ ORDERING THB MORE IN CONNB CTION WITH ANNE EATION N0. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTSNG THB FINAL BNGINEBR'S REPORT POR DR 87-31, TRACT NOB. 13557. 13562 AHD 13559 D, ANNBEATIOV NO. 12 POfl DH B7-31 LOCATBD NORTH OP 4TH 244 STRBBT AND WEST OP LUCAS RANCH ROAD TO STBBBT LIGRTIMG MAINTENAN(8 DISTRICT N0. 6 RESOLUTION N0. 88405 245 I A sBSOLPTION OP THE CITY CooNCLL OP THB CITY OP RANCHO COCAMOVGA~ CALIPORNIA~ ORDERING THE WOES IM CONVECTION WITH ~ ANNSEATLON N0. 1T TO STBEBT LIGHTING MAINTBNANCB DISTRICT NO. 6 AIID ACCEPTING THS FINAL BNGINEER'8 RBPORT POR DE 57-31 E. ANNEEATIOV N0. 2 POR TRACT NOB. 13557. !3562. AND 251 i , I , 13159 i:ARYH1 TO STRR_xT_ ~T nHTFNG YyI TaTR HANCE ~ DLSTRI CT MO, 5 ~ PAGE •~ Cit Council A ends o ~~ e°i j Y 8 O~y'Ya April 6, 1988 16 i RBSOLPTION N0. 88208 252 i A RBSOLUTTON OP THS CITY COUNCII, OF THH CITY OP BANCHO CUCAMONCA~ CALIPOHNIA~ ORD88SNG THS WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ~ ANNBYATZOM N0. 2 TO STBSST LIGNTING MAINTBNANCS DISTRICT N0. 5 AND ACCEPTING TH8 PINAL BNGINBBR'S BBPORT POB T4ACT ~ NOS. 13557} 13582, AND 13559 1. PBRLIC NEARIIIGS The folloring item} hoe no legal pnbliution or posting requirement}. The Chair rill open the meeting to receive pablie teatinoer. None submitted. G. CIlS WNAaR'S 8TA1P RBPORS$ The folleving iteaa do not legal lr tegnire gar public tea timonr~ although the Chair ur open the meetiog For public iapnt. 1. CONS IDHBATION OP STAPF'8 DENIAL OP APPLIGTION POB 260 ° PBHMlT TO CONSTRUf.T aaTVa ~o°°^~n_o n o~im ur ° HILLS I08 AVBNOH. NEST 08 MORNING CANYON WAY. BL188LY RBSIOBNCB. 5516 MORNING CANYON WAY. (Continued from March 18, 1988 meeting) 2. MUSIC AND AMPLLPIGTION POLICY POR CITY PABR PACILITIHS 264 - Consideration of a music and emplif icatioo policy is city perk facilities. 3. CONS IDHBATION OP T8LSP80N8 SBBV ZCBB IN RANCHO p87 CUCANONGA. (Continued Eros March 18, 1988 meeting) 4. CONSIDS RATIOp OP STUDENT PARKING ALTERNATIVES IN TH8 Zg~ VICINITY OP ALTA LONA HZCH SCHOOL. i ~ 5. CONSIDBBATxON OP BESOLUTION TO ESTA8i.T3A A °U°ST**~°° ' X36 ' j ' Pleia DISTRICT. L PAGE 0~m ~;°a 3~ City Council Agenda April 6, 1988 17 BHSOLUTION NO, 88-207 29~ it A BHSOLOTION OP T88 CITY COORCZL OP TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ RHQORSTING T88 LOCAL ACHNCY POHMATION COMMISSION TO TAB PROCHHDINGS POB THB ~ ESTABLISHlBNT OP TH8 POOTHILL PIRH ~ PBCTECTICN DISTHSCT AS A SUSSIDLARY DISTRICT OP TNH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA a. copecn. HDRna9H The fol3oAo; iteas hoe been regwated by the City Cowcil for discauioa. Thee ere not pablic huriag iteas~ al[hoagh the Chair ~ open the aeetiag for public input. 1. CONSIDHRATZON OP PROCHDORHS POR PILLING pACANCIHB ON 291 POBLIC SAFHTY COlNISSION AND ON T86 PAR[ dND RHCHHATION COMMISSION, ' 2. CONS IDHHATION TO SUPPORT HISTORIC PHBSBHPATION 295 CONM199ION MISSION STATHMHNT. I. IDLRTIPICATId Ol I"1E11R POR BHT I~TIRC :ais is cue ciao for eicy wmcii co ianaciq ens iced they rich to discau at the nett aeetinH. These iteo All not be discaoed a[ thi• aeetiog~ only identified Eor the aezt aeeting. J, COMIWfICATIO~ iRI1M TH6 POBLIC This is the tir sad place for the seneral public to address the City Council. State In prohibits the City Comeil frea addrauios any issue not praviaraly included oa the Agenda. 1'ha City Conncil say receive testiaony sad ant the aattar for a aubsegaent aeetiat. Coa~eata ara to be lis3ted to five Aartes per iadividwl. '/ PAGE ~/ a~`y~ Ci[y Council Agenda a'e 6t3 April 6~ 1938 18 L AATODflOER[ I~ Beverly A. Authe lets City Clerk of the City of flaacho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accura[e copy of the foregoing agenda vas posted on April 1, 1988, eeventy-tw (72) hours prior [o the meeting per A.H. 2676 at 9320-C Baee I Line Hoad. S i.8y a.,m ..- ~~ £~ 2 3 ~, 'I S%3 _ - "'pe D SL - fie- _--oo~ ~ _ __ '3 ~ p° Y p ix , • - c Y n9 _~ °i ~S ~ .._ c ~ ___ - :\,.. a ~ - - - -~aa - _ ~ _ ~s "~ y Pass _ r °C - cis e _ ai3 f I 8 ~>.. .. _~~: a ~ - N' \d ~XY~ '^ ~ Y Ek - ~ Y Y Y _ ~. ~ ~, \ - .. .~.. ,. ~_ - _ - - ~ ~ ~ ~~ 'I ',S .°_~ .~.LF .~u a S_m.m'. .^. ~e'_-^.~C-mffiau~~~IIa .,m~e..°<&: 1 g 't ' m y' ~ _ ~~ ; FRS a s~~k~fi'~~g.~~~¢A$R°~~gRE;;~ a yg ~=~A~3R ~ ~ ! ' T_~°^>1~~ ' ~ i ugi ~ i ' ' ~ 3't9 ~ _ ~~8~ _b` •~'d",S 9'CSA D 8„E~"~'8 Y'TCFC~St AID&~~C~' ~ ~r~_. ~~gJ' 3aFE~~~~ ~ " e ~'2 ~ m-- -_~~em..esda~_~a~~a^ ~~scc~c m - e _ m §~ ~ 's"8-sassaaagea'a 's ss.es<ssa ~ ssg<ava ='e a ~ ' Se ~ ~~~~~~~8%~=8~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 $g~8888 ~a ,~ ^ ~ 8 €R '} 8SS86%868658%%888£8888 8 88888R% ~F~ x v - - ~~ ~ - a _ 'ss""°'ssas'sa~R#'sa'sasess'saa ~ segeaeB '~ _ °~~ _ s F 6 se ~ ' s~~~~se~~~~8e~~~~~&g~~8 6 ' ' ' ~ gg~e8a8 ' ' ~ '~~ ~ ~ ee r. as88sa886~sss s s 6 s s ss6s % a6 s s86 s , .. xs ts~§e~sts~#'s ss$s$as$a$$sas ussa~s~ _o e SS °~. 5x8~~8~~~8C%FbY8k~~~~~bsSS ~ IX~x~58~ o •,• mm .."mom V 3^o- em.,a.,~e ° p SG .vY~YB is g= a 8S8eSe%88~5~888.%85888a w 88~%8e8 ~'~ a ~~ g ~~~~~~~~~#yk#~#$~$§~~gL a 88885°8 v 8 °e8 i+ 8R88888888g886S88888885 8 8688588 '.F ~ _ -vBvRot=~RvYB=voYegg,., e~ ' ' - _= e S _ =~emx~ g,x x3avadw.s=. - ~=s3 ~'8~ _ ~ 8A1A661R1B9ll1HfVewi m`o7e ~~~_~ .. _ _ __ .. ~. °.8.~8<$~X~e~'~G~~.~,~=moL~.~^. S_-m~v~ '~3Y ., 2 ' ~~~ yam°as~x ~'~~ '. wee vo_~es~e -~ - ass~a-<^ ~ _ _ e aa~ ~ ~e' as., s ~sA -mP ~. '_ .aa - =8c ,_°sos ' =R _' 35o%e_ a~'~ W ?.. RA ..a3R9~:,A 3 8: ~e: _,:~ ~ ~ .. .. ~~.. -°'~°'-~ e xa~3~~ ~ __ - .. ~,'z ass ~~ ~ ~5 a~~~~~~~ ~ ~na~ao-:aa wx 3': ~- _a.~~aa~"sue ~~ - -_ V Stl Y ~" p ~ k ~ ~ ~~ X=.._ ~ ~-.. ~.. _.._~. __ 3 N 3 R 3 :~ x Ix g .f ~: ~~ m{ m ~~ ~_ - ~s= __~ m~= $~ e~ IF h g; -_ ~ ~o$ 4 a i d _~ _ _;_, R' ~8 ;~ i '~~. 'xs aR .; 'Ym v '~ ' f: Y '$ Y 5 Y S ~' ~ ~ ~ :: - i - ~ Yo- Y ffi Y _ .~ 3 W3 - m ~~ ~ ti - ' '~ ~ m a ° .k ~, ~., ~ _.. s ~~ 3 __ - f YY a 3 ~ 8 ~ ~ dx °a { 3 ~ ~~ °~ ~ 3 ~6 a ~ ~ S S ~ ~ e c S Y - ~ _ ~~ _ _ _ ~ _ _ :~~ %~.. Y S %a ~5 :A _ s February 16, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A adjourned joint meeting of the City Council and the Planning Commis Sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Tuesday, February 16, 1968, at the Magic Lamp Restaurant, Genie Room, 8189 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga. The me etinq was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Co unc ilmembe rs: Deborah N. Brown, Jeffrey King, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Abs e~~a were Councilmembers: Charles J. Buquet II and Pamela J. Wright. Present were Planning Commission Members: Peter Tolstoy, Bruce Emerick, Suzanne Chitiea, David Bla kesley, and Chairman Larry Mc Ni el. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy City Attorney, Ralph Hansen; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; Disaster Preparedness Coordinator, Marti Higgins; City Planner, Brad ~• ~~ ~=NU Ly CiLy Funnier, uii.u nruu[i}; ~r. rian ner, uan Lo leman; 5r. Planne r~, Larry Henderson; Assistant Planner, Miki Bratt. Guest: Judy Orttung, RS, MPH Environmental Specialist for Hazardous Materials, Risk Management and Fian ning of San Bernardino County. . + + .. . 8. PROGRAM PRIORITIES Bi. Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plan (AB 2948, Tanner). Judy Orttun g, RS, MPH Environmental Specialist for Hazardous Materials, Risk Management and Planning of San Bernardino County, Ms. Ortt ung presented an overview of the County's Hazardous Waste Ma nagement Plan. Ms. Orttuna's ...o.:~.. a.. n.......w ~... . ---••-~-•~•• -~~ •~~~~..~~ oy ya b~ivii dii aiiiwer period. ACTION: The report was received and filed. * + + . ~ k Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes February 16, 1988 Page 2 62. Appeal Procedure, - Look back over last two years. - Look forward. - Methods for Improving Appeal Re por ti n9. - Inclusion of Precedents. The item was placed on the agenda at the request of Maynr Stout. Staff report was presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilman King stated that a concern of his regarding appeals is where the Planning Commission is requiring undergro unding. He felt the Planning Commission was ignoring the cost of such un derg ro and ing. Planning Comnissi on er Chitiea stated they were trying to develop procedures which were consistent. Planning Comnissi on er Mc Ni el stated they were encouraged because a number of appeals has decreased. They felt that was because they were getting support from the Council. Mayor Stout stated he liked consistency also and requested that when stzff did their staff report, to list all other cases which were similar but had not appealed. Perhaps a special section could be included in the staff report giving this informs tton and what Lhe Pl ar:n ing Ccrer,i ssi o^. and City Council has done in the past in similar situations. Me also expressed that a copy of the approved Planning Commission Minutes be included in the staff report, which was nac aiwayo o~ ..y '„~,... (Larry Mc Niel left. at 8:45 P.M.) * * 3 * 83. City Council/Planning Comnissi on Goals Quality Development. Council purpose may be different than Conission by Design versus Economic Consideration Mayor Stout stated their position was to make those living in the Community happy not the developer, ng - Commissi en.er chit.ea ;fated w being +otd that our Gity was tough, but often developers are coming back and thanking us because whai we are yelling out of the process is one of their best projects. Councilwoman Brown also expressed that the Planning Commission should make their Joint City Council/Planning Commission Minutes February 16, 1998 Page 3 Commissioner Tolstoy asked about densities in the City Both Cou ncilmembe rs Brown and King res pcnded that this was in the Council's goals, and they were looking at it. Commissioner Tolstoy also stated he felt the City should take a look at the quality of life, and one of those things is space. "ii'wvnidn Divwl iwted Jpe ui ti1B prubi Bali hai been UUt making a developer build the main arterial streets along with his development in order to get those people out of town. Discussion followed regarding traffic and development of Day Creek Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. • : : r * : C. AOdUURNMENT Mayor Stout adjourned the meeting at 9:41 P. M. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Au thelet City Clerk Approved: March 2, 1988 LITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA REUEV EL OPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A rzgular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, March 2, 1986, in the Lions Park Conmunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 1:00 p.m. by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were Agencymembers; Charles J. Bu quet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright and Chairman Oennis L. Stout. Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren M. Wasserman; Deputy Director, Jack Lam; Senior RDA Analyst, Linda Daniels; Legal Counsel, James Markman; RDA Analyst, Olen Jones; RDA Analyst, Leann Faust; Assistant Secretary, Beverly Au thel et. Absent was Agencymember; Deborah N. Brown Assistant Secretary, Beverly Au Lhelet arrived at 7:03 p.m. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, introduced Leann Faust, RDA Analyst + + w + . a B. CONSENT CALENBAR B1. Approval of Minutes: February 3, 1988. 82. Approval to receive and file r,ur rent Investment Schedule as of February 25, 1988. MOTION: Moved by Kinq, seconded by Wright to approved the Consent Calendar. Me tion carried 4-0-1. (Brown absent) . t :. . . Redevelopment Agency Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 2 C. PUBLIC HEARINGS None submitted. ~ ~ . ~ . < D. STAFF REPORTS DI Agencymember Wright asked what was Cal tra n's ti meframe? en Russell Maguire, City Engineer, responded that the first phase must have a PSR a Required Program by Caltrans which would include the entire Foothill corridor. The other phases would he in the normal Caltrans process. Jack Lam pointed out it is normal i:n do this even tho unn we are paying for i±. Agencymember Stout asked if the plan was adopted as presented, would that handle all policy questions? Jack Lam stated that staff was asking for policy direr. ti on as mentioned on page 38. After some discussion, staff received the followi r,g directions: 1. Agency Participation/Financing.- The Agency would like to see some incentives aimed specifically at inducing re devele pment along the corridor and participation in the puhlic improvements. 2. Incentive Programs. - The Agency would like to see some suggestions for incentives. Agencymember Stout felt flexibility was important. Agencymember Buquet would like improvements to be extended beyond fac ids. 3. Timing - Agency felt the 10-year Ulan was rea so na hlr and did nn_+ r;ch rn -- tha Lap ienienla li mi "r ian given exc iusive use of Agency financial resources in order to implement the program as quickly as possible. 4. Phasing Alternative. - Recommended phases. 5. Parcel Consolidation - yes Redevelopment Agency Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 3 F. Existing Business - yes. Agencymember Stout would like to make it more agressive for the existing businesses and give assistance in moving off Foothill for those 6u si nesses that really don't belong there. ACTION: Jack Lam, Deputy Director, will incorporate these ideas and bring back to the Redevelopment Agency for approval. • :. • . « E. COlWUNI CATIONS FRON THE PUBLIC None submitted. . ~ ~ ~ ~ . F. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Kina, seconded 6y Wright to ad iourn to a closed session. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Brown absent). The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda Rogers Acting Secretary March 2, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONG,4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re oular Me etina A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ra nc ha Cucamonga met on Wednesday, March 2, 1988, in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Counc ilmembers: Charles J. 8u guet [I, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present Were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, James Markman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Assistant City Manager, Robert A. Rizzo; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Bred Rul ler; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Building Official, Jerry Grant; Deputy City Engineer, Bill Silva; Senior Planner, Dan Coleman; Associate Civil Engineer, Joe Sto fa; Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau. Absent was Councilmember: Deborah N. Brown. . ,r x + ~ . B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation proclaiming March 6 - 12 as Girl Scout Week. 82. Presentation of a 10-Year Service Award to Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager. • x ,t x C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 2/17/88 and 2/24/88 and Payroll endf ng 2/18/88 for the total amount of E844,699.94. C2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of February 26, 1988. City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 2 C3. Approval to solicit appraisals for ttie future North East Community Park site, a General Plan designation located in the Etiwanda area. (1404-06 PK DEV EL) C4. Deny appeal of the Planning Commission's dec isior, for Envi ronmentai Ass ess-ent ar,d ?e ^.tative ?ra[t 1'i57q, Richard Avo ub, and confirm the City Council action of a public hearing held February 17, 1988. (0701-06 APPEAL) RESOLUTION N0. 88-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUOI CE TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 13579, AN APPLICATION TO APPROVE A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISED OF NINE UNITS ON .69 ACRES Of LAND IN THE MEOI UM RESIDENTIAL GIST RI CT AND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, 325 FEET NORTH OF NINETEENTH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF C5. Approval of a proposal to designate the Sc howalter House, located at 5495 Hermosa Avenue (northeast Corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside Road), as Historic Landmark Designation No. 27 - APN 201-101 -04. (1402-06 HISTORY) RESOLUTION NO. 88-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, i,HLi FGni:i A, STD,^,1C !p,unr nov nre rrNO7TnN Nn. 77 TO DESIGNATE "TH E^SCHOMALTER HOUSE" LOCATED AT 5495 HERMOSA AVENUE C6. Approval to declare as surplus equipment and authorize sale of vehicles through public auction a 1961 Jeep Cherokee and a 1919 Chevrolet 3/4 ton truck. (0604-02 SURPLS PRP) C1. Approval to accept the Turner Avenue Street Improvements and Area VII Storm Orain Phase [ Improvement Froject as complete, release bonds, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and approve the final contract amount of $955,406.44. (0602-01 80ND REL) (0704-18 NOT COMPLT) Release: Faithful Performance Bond $885,165.90 RC tc iti vn $ Y5 ,S93.r"J4 I.a bor 8 Materials Bond $442,582.95 Accept; 10% Maintenance Bond E 95,600.00 City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 3 RESOLUTION N0. 88-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TURNER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS ANU AREA VI[ STORM DRAIN, PHASE I AND ,.,,TIIORIL'f7G TIIC FIL P7G O, A NOT: CC OF COMPLETION FOR ~~~. WORK C8. Approval to award the bid for the Arrow Route Reconstruction Phase I Improvement Project located between Turner Avenue and Archibald Avenue to Fontana Paving, Incorporated for the amount of $243,900 to be funded from the Systems fund, account number 22-4637-8135. (0601-01 BID) C9. Approval to authorize the advertising of a "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Slurry Seal Program Phase I Fiscal Year 1981-88 Improvement Project, located in areas 1 thru 9 to be funded from SB 300 Funds, account number 15-4637-6050. (0601-01 BID) RESOLUTION N0. 88-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM, PHASE I, F.Y. 1987-88", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING ANO DIRECTING THE C[TY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE B[DS Diu. Hpp ro vai co award and execute cite rru ressi unai Services Ayreenien~ (w oo- 026) for the Contract Inspection Services for the Arrow Route Reconstruction Phase I project to NBS/Cowry, Incorporated, for the amount of $13,700 to be funded from the Systems Fund, account number 2Z-4637-8735. (0602-01 CONTRACT) C11. Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 88-021) with J. William Murphy and Associates Consulting Appraisers for an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 to be paid from various project funds for appraisal services. (0602-01 CONTRACT) C12. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 4 (CO 87-20) with Gon Greek and Associates to perform additional design reports for Alta Loma Basins, west of Haven Avenue, north of Highland Avenue; to expand their contract by $2,500.00 to bring contract total to $19,152.00. (0602-O1 LONT AMEN) Ci3. APp ruvdi of aii aiiieiidiiieiit (D"v GB-G2) to dii Agree Pie iit iGr Pubi7t IinpiGremeiit and Dedication with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Erma Dennis for the Base Line Road Widening Project from Archibald Avenue to Hellman Avenue, to clarify future street improvement requirements for Base Line Road. (0602-01 AGREE IMPRO) City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 4 C14. Approval of the Environmental Assessment Initial Study and Issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed Base Line Road Phase I Rehabilitation, Widening, and Storm Drain Improvements from I-15 to Etiwanda Avenue. (1110-10 STREET PI) kESOL UTION NU. 88-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI iY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY ANO ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED BASE LINE ROAD PNASE I REHABILITATION, NIDENIN G, AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM I-15 TO ETIWANDA AVENUE C15. Approval to release cash deposits for: (0602-01 BOND REL) Tract 12914 /Ba rossa Place - to Pannon Design 8 Development, Inc. Model Home Sales Office $2,500 Monument Sign Permit $ 500 Tract 12238 - Citation Builders. Model Home Sales Office $2,500 Tract 12830 - Citation Builders. Subdivision Identification Sign $ 628 C16. P.p pro val to Quitclaim Lot B, Tract No. 12942, located within the Caryn Planned Community, to Kaufman and Broad Lznd Company. (1002-02 QUITCLAIM) RESOLUTION N0. 88102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE QUITCLAIMED LOT 8, TRACT N0. 12942 C17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds, and filing Notices of Completion for: (0502-01 BOND REL) (0704-18 NOT COMP LT) DR 86-D7 - iota ied on the nortnea st corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue. Faithful Performance Bond $60,000 (Utility Undergroundin9) City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 5 RESOLUTION N0. 88-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 86-07 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C18. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 87-31, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, north of Fourth Street, submitted by Turner/Lucas Rancho Road Partners. (0602-01 AGREE IMPRV) RESOLUTION N0, 88304 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SFCURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87-31 C19. Approval of Improvement agreement and Improvement Security for Elm Avenue from Church Street northeasterly to Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes of California as part of the Terra Vista Planned Conmun ity. (0602-01 AGREE IMPRO) RESOLUTION N0. 88-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM AVENUE C20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 84-12, located on Lhe northeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Patscheck- Hack6arth. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN) RESOLUTION N0. fl8-]06 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR OR 84-12 C 21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10035, located on the southeast corner of Red Nill Country Club Drive and Calle Co ra zon, submitted by Rancho Associates. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN) Prc OLU!!/~N Nn. gi311~i A P.ESDLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10035 City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 6 C22. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9192 located in The Caryn Planned Community, submitted by Marlborough Development Company. (1002-09 MAP PARCEL) 0602-Oi AGREE IMPRV) RESOLUTION NO. 88-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9192, (TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP NO. 9192), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY C23. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for Tracts 13557, 13559, and 13562 located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, north and south of Vintage Drive, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation and Kaufman and Broad. (1002-09 MAP PARCEL) 0602-01 AGREE IMPRV) RESOLUTION NO. 88-109 A RESOLUT[ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13557, 13559, AND 13562 C24. Approval to execute contract (CO 88-028) far the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing Project, located north of Base Line Road previously awarded to Riverside Construction Company, Incorporated for the amount of E112,456 to be funded from Federal Section 203 Fund, account number ll-463/-B///, and the Systems tuna, account number 22-vo3i-o75G. (CGG2- O1 CONTRACT) C25. Set public hearing fur April 6, 1988 - Approval to Annex Dr 87 -31, located north of 4th Street and west of Lucas Ranch Road to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 16. (0401-03 LN SCAPE MD) FES OLUTION N0. 88 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPRGV AL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 16 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 RESOLUTION N0. 88-111 H RrSDLUTiOH DF THE CITY CDUHCiI GF IHE CiT'i GF RANCHO C"CA~MONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING [TS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNE%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GIST RICT N0. 3, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DES [GNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNE%ATION N0. 16 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 7 C26. Set public hearing for April 6, 1986 - Approval to Annex Tract Nos. 13557, 13562, and 13559 (Caryn) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 2. (0401-03 LN SCAPE MD) RESUL UTi ON N0. 88-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIM1NARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 2 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RESOLUTION NC. 88313 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNE%AT ION AS ANNE%ATION N0. 2 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LAN DSCAPYNG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C21. Set p:)hlit hez ring for April 6, 1988 - ADprovzt to Arnex DR 81-31, Tract 13557, 13562 and 13559 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I as Annexation No. 39. (0401-03 ST LT MD) RESOLUTION N0. 88-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNE%ATION N0. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE GIST RI CT N0. 1 RESOLUTION N0. 86-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: OES IGNATING SAID ANNE%ATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE GIST RI CT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE IANNSCAPINf, AND Iif,HTING Af.T OF 1977 ANN OFFF RING A T1MF AND PLACE hOR HLARING 08JEC II ONS THERETO C28. Set public hearing for April 6, 1988 - Approval to Annex DR 81-31, located north of 4th Street and Nest of Lucas Ranch Road, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 12. (0401-03 ST LT MD) City Council Minutes March 2, 1968 Page 8 RESOLUTION N0. 89316 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUClU10NGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGlNEE R'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OI ST RICT NO. 6 RESOLUTION N0. 88117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING [TS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN ASSESSMENT OISTRI CT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND I.I GHTING ACT OF '_972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C29. Set public hearing for April 6, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract 13557, 13562, and 13559 (Caryn) to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 as Annexation No. 2. (0401-03 ST LT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 68-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF C[TY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 RESOLUTION N0. 89 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTRI CT NO. 5; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C30. Set public hearing for April 6, 1988 - Approval to amend Map Tract No. 10R77-2 Inra teH 4QUth of Wilson Avenue betHeen Haven and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by U.S. Homes, Incorporated. (1002-09 MAP AMEND) RESOLUTION NO. 88-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDING MAP, TRACT 10827-2 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 9 OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved 6y King, seconded by Wright to adopt the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0-I. (Brown absent) x x + + x x D. CONSENT ORDINANCES City Clerk Au thel et read the titles of Ordinances 340 and 70-F. D1. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT - Recomnen da Lion to establish a 45 MPH and a 40 MPH speed limit on Ile nnosa Rvenue between Base Line Road and Sun Valley Drive; a 40 MPH speed limit on Ninth Street between Baker Avenue and Archibald Avenue; and a 50 MPH speed limit on Rochester Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. (1141-10 SPEED LIN) ORDINANCE N0. 340 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON GA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN S7REET5 D2. CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 70 - An amendment to increase criminal penalties and adding civil remedies. 1402-06 HISTORY) ORDINANCE N0. 70-F (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LU CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.24.210 OF, AND ADDING A NEN SECTION 2.24.220 T0, CHAPTER 2.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, THEREBY INCREASING CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND ADDING CIVIL REMEDIES Co uncilmember Wright requested item D1 be removed for discussion. Council member King requested item D2 be removed for discussion. ++++x+ Disr.utainn of item pI, D1. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT - Recommends Lion to establish a 45 MPH and a 0 MPH speed limit on He rniosa venue between Base Line Road and Sun Valley Drive; a 40 MPH speed limit on Ninth Street between Baker Avenue and Archibald Avenue; and a 50 MPH speed limit on Rochester Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 10 ORDINANCE N0. 340 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, f,ALIFORN[A, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRi MA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN STREETS Council member Nright asked if the public hearing was still open. Jim Markman, City Attorney, responded no. Council member Wright stated she had four areas of concern, and they had to do with the area on the north end above Hermosa School where the speed limit will be 40 mph. 1) The residents asked that the Council be made aware that there is additional development scheduled for that area, and they are concerned this will generate more traffic that will impact students walking to Hermosa School. 2) Asked what the time line is for improving the walkway. 3) Is it possible to get information from Upland on how they are doing a lower speed limit than what their surveys indicated and going with a speed limit they feel is more appropriate. 4) Would like to refer entire issue of safe access to Hermosa School to Public Safety Commission. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, stated the school was already under review by the PSC on access and walking including this area and that is what generated the review of sidewalks and the 6a sic request for considering the grading work that we're trying to improve. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that some of that work for improving the walk has already been dene, and the rest is being done now. Pam Wright asked if there is a brief report of what further safety measures we will be providing. Paul Ro geau responded that the PSC's recommendations were to grade and smooth out the roadside leading from the north on Hermosa, on the west side of Hermosa, and on the north side of Wilson where there are no sidewalks since those are the only two areas where children have to walk. On the other approaches where there are houses, there are either sidewalks or roadside improvements have already been made. Counc ilmember Wright stated she is aware of sere rxl ins farces in Upland where Their speed limits are set lower than the State allows, and she was wondering how thzy do that. Paul Rougeau, Sr. Civil Engineer, responded that he had talked to the traffic engineer in Upland. He was told that Upland was not doing anything unusual. Mr, Rougeau pointed out the law does allow for speed 1lmits to be set below the prevailing speed if you have special conditions, but that these conditions do City Council Minutes March 2~, 1988 Page 11 not exist in this particular area. Counc it member Nright wished to amend the ordinance for the north end of Hermosa from 40 mph to 35 mph. Counc ilmember 8u quet was in support of that but didn't see any way we can make it 35 mph and make it stick in court. Mayor Stout stated if the speed limit isn't justified by the traffic engineer's report, then you cannot use radar. In this particular area, it would be impossible to use pacing; and the courts are real picky on this. Although he was in support of the 35 mph, without a Way to enforce it, he felt the speed limit should 6e reduced to 40 mph so We can use radar. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance 340. Motion carried 4-1. (Brown absent) MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to adopt Ordinance 340 with direction for staff to re-review in 12-18 months. Motion carried 3-1-1. (Nright no, Brown absent) • • • • ~ ~ a+++a« Discussion of item D2. D2. CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 70 - An amendment to increase criminal penalties and adding civi remedies. ORDINANCE N0. 10-F' (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.24.210 DF, AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 2.24.220 T0, CHAPTER 2.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAM ONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, THEREBY INCREASING CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND ADDING CIVIL REMEDIES Councilmember King requested this item be pulled for discussion, so he could vote no on it. MOTION: Noved Uy King, seconded by wri ght to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 10-F. Motion carried 4-1. (Brown absent) MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to adopt Ordinance No. 70-F. Motion carried 3-1-1. (King no, Brown absent) • + + . t . City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Pz ge 12 E. pOYERTISEO PUBLIC HEARINGS E1. APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 - THE PACIFIC SOU?H'dEST CONFERENCE CF THC EV NGELI CAL COVENANT CHURCH - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision requiring payment of an in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Carnelian Street for a proposed residential subdivision located at the southwest corner of Carnelian Street and Highland Avenue - APN 201-214-11. Staff report by Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer. (0701-06 APPEAL) Councilmember King asked what the Lost would be? Staff responded E6400 per acre or E23,000 and E47,000 to the center line of the freeway. Councilmember Wright asked how soon would the undergrounding be donel Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, responded that there was no way to know at this time, but that it would not be in the near future. Mayor Stout asked if there were other occasions where we had charged these fees? Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, responded that fees had been charged for Hellman and Amethyst and Highland and Etiwanda. i•ieyur• Swuc yuesn ones roar tms fee was for only 1/Z of the undergrounding costs. Staff responded "yes". Councilmember Wright asked if the freeway does go through, does the undergrounding have to be done? City Engineer, Russell Maguire, responded that at this particular area the undergrounding wouldn't be required. Mayor Stout open the public hearing. Addressing Council were: Eugene Lowell, attorney representing The Pacific Southwest Conference of the Evangelical Covenant Church, requested Council examine the language of the policy statement on Exhibit "E" paragraph 6A. They felt that paragraph was being improperly applied to their situation. He stated that the proposed fr22way i; not an adjacent street and that their property is not a corner. They felt the land south of us is owned by Cal trans and since they are the abutting owner, they are the ones who should pay for the 227 feet. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Councilmember Wright asked how continuous have our collections been along this City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 13 corridor? James Markman, City Attorney, stated we have no methodology in collecting underg rounding fees or requiring Caltra ns when they build the freeway to go along with an un dergrounding program or any other public entity that owns right way. There is no way of requiring the developer to create the aesthetic condition other than to go to the centerline of the street. That is Planning Comm~i ssi on policy. Russell Maguire, City Engineer, stated we have received a letter from Edison informing us that the fees are being lowered. James Markman, City Attorney, stated figures may drop even further because of an IRS ruling that when undergrounding is strictly aesthetic and required by the City, then Edison will not be taxed on it. Mayor Stout asked what the affect would be nn other projects that have paid this fee. Referring to change in polity, would those people be entitled to a refund. City Attorney responded that those people could come 6atk and amend the conditions. MOTION: Made by King to grant the appeal. Motion failed for lack of a second. MOTION: Made by Bu quet, seconded by Nri ght to deny the appeal. Motion carried s-I-i. (King no, Nrown absent) x x + a E2. ur KHw 6HU wcHMUn GH - a proposal to amend the Victoria Community Plan text to require a Conditional Use Perrz~it for shopping centers and certain conmercial uses. Staff report by Dan Coleman. (0203-05 VCP AMEN) ORDINANCE N0. 341 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 88-01 TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TF%T 70 REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE 'rERMii FOR SHuPPiNG DENTE KS AND CERTAIN USES IN THE COMMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - proposal tp amend the Terra ista Community Plan text to require a Conditional Use Permit for shopping centers and certain commercial uses. (0203-05 TV CP AMEN) City Council Minutes March 2, 1488 Page 14 ORDINANCE N0. 342 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMAU NITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-01, TO MCOIfY THE COMMUNITY PLAN T"e XT TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PE RMIt FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND CERTAIN USES IN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL STANDARDS SECTION OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN Mayor Stout asked if the intent was to bring these areas into conformance with the rest of the City? Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes and that he had spoken with Lewis Homes, and they were supportive. Mayor Stout opened the public hearing. Rdd ressi ng Council was: Steven McCord, William Lyon Company, expressed their support. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. City Clerk Aut hel et reaA the titles of Oriinances 341 and 342. MOTION: Moved by Wrigh c, seconded by Bu quet to waive full reading of Ordinances 341 and 342 and set the second reading for March 17, 1988. Motion carried 4-1. (urown ahsentl + .. r . . E3 nrwimn rcyu< w ain<nu um w~a~wn uo~mn~ vi <nc rai the purposes of accomplishing the realignment of Hillside Road to replace the double intersection of Hillside Road and Amethyst Avenue with a single intersection at Amethyst Avenue and a reverse curve to future Klusman Avenue. Staff report by Paul Rougeau, Sr. Civil Engineer. (0203-03 GP AMEN) RESOLUTION N0. 88-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COIINCII, OF THE CITY OF R.4NCH0 CUCRMONGA, CALi r'ORNiA, APPROV inG GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 88-018 AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Mayor Stout stated Wilson will eventually be four lanes and that Hillside is also a collector street that will be two lanes endfng at Deer Creek. Would that jog create a tendency for people to go down to Amethyst rather than jog. City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 15 Paul Rougeau, Sr. Civil Engineer, agreed that people would go to Wilson to avoid the jog. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: John "rowers, attorney representing Nottingham Limited, stated Council should have received a letter outlining their concerns. He turned the meeting over to his engineers. Larry Spa ke, Spoke Engineering, distributed a Leiter for City Clerk to receive and file. He stated that the "S" curve would go through the middle of this property and thus limits what can be developed on this property. The general plan has this area listed as residential, and he felt this realignment would change this from a minor intersection to a major intersection. This change doubles the amount of public improvements required, and he felt this would be an excessive economic burden. Neal McNi el, who lived just south of Hillside, stated he was orginally against any change because he and the other residents near him originally wanted corner lots. However, after hearing the number of cars expected on this street, he no longer wished to be a corner lot. He stated he would like to see the eld Hillside made into a bridle trail with the wall taken down. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. Co until member King stated he was against the "S" curve and felt the City had made a decision to make Nilson the main thoroughfare and should discourage traffic on Hillside. He wanted to see the intersection left as it is which he felt would move the traffic to Wil sor,. Councilmember Wright felt the street needed to be made as safe as possible and that traffic has been determined as the number one priority of the residents and Council. She felt a need to develop both Hillside and Wilson. Councilmember euquet felt he would prefer to have traffic rerouted. He was uncomfortable with how the old Hi115i de would be vacated and its uses but supported the realignment. Maynr Stout supoo rted realignment and frlt it was an advantage in helping nmet hyst. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Bu quet to approve Resolution No. 88-121. Motion carried 3-1-1. (King no, Brown absent) * • * M 4 k City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 16 E4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING MAP FOR TRACT N0. 13058 - P ~urcrvnHi wn, r mitni inn wrcrurcni~un - x request to amens the map or tract uuoU located south of Highland Avenue, between Fairmont Way and the Deer Creek Channel. Staff report by Bill Silva, Deputy City Engineer. (1002-09 MAP AMEN) RESOLUTION N0. SSd22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RMENDING MAP OF TRACT N0. 13058 Mayor Stout opened the public hearing. There being no response, the pu 6l it hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88-122. Motion carried 3-2. (Bu quet, Brown absent) k + • k + r E5. DRDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH: A. ANNE%ATION N0. 10 FOR PARCE! N STREET ANO SPRUCE VENUE. NORTH OF RED RESOLUTION N0. 88323 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OROE RING THE NORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE%ATION N0. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPT iNG THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 11236 B. RESOLUTION N0. 8824 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFnaNiA, nBOERiNG THE WORK IN CDNNECTION KITH ANNE%ATION N0. z5 i0 SiHEEI L1GHt1NG MAINTENANCE DtsT R[CT N0. 2 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13275 C. City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 17 RESOLUTION N0. 88-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 42 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGiNEE R'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13275 3 D. RESOLUTION N0. 88-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRI CT N0. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 11236 E. RESOLUTION N0. 88427 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION KITH ANNEXATION N0. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING MRINTE NAN CE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT N0. 13275 AND PARCEL MAP N0. 11236 Mayor Stout opened the pu hl fc hearing. There being no response, the public hearing Has closed, MOTION: Made by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution Nos. 88-123, 88- 124, 88-125, 88-126, 88-127. Motion carried 3-2. (Buquet, Brown absent) • :: * . « F. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. « : ~ ~ G. CITY IUNAGER'S STAFF REPORTS City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 18 + . * . ~ ~ G2. DISCUSSION OF TELEPHONE SITUATION IN RANCHO CUCAMON GA. (Continued from February 17, 1988 ~Bu quet Staff report presented by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. (1200-00 P, IiT IL ITY) ACTION: Staff to pro pa re draft of letter to General Telephone for consideration on March 16, 1988, agenda. < • ~ t r G3. Mayor Stout asked if keeping tights aligned was a continuing problem. Kathy Sorenson, Sr. Recreation Assistant, responded that the windstorms continue to shift lights. Staff is working with the contractor to qet these fixed pe nnanenciy. Mayor Stout asked if anyone else has this type of light. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, stated he believed no one else had these "state of the art" lights. Counc ilmember Bu quet felt is was taking a very long time to resolve this issue, and he would like to see it expedited. He was uncomfortable with the lights always being left on but would like to have them on when needed. Counc ilmember Wrf ght felt the complaint was that the lights are being left on when no one was using the property and that a way needed to be found for the tights to be on only when the fields were in use. ~iaycr Stout opened tirc meeting for pu hl is hearing. Addressing Council were: George Guiders, 1363 Garnet, stated he loves the parks during the day, but that the lights are very bright. He was upset that none of the residents had been notified about these meetings. City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 19 Dr. Tom Stidohay, felt the area needed some relief from these lights; possibly some type of hood that would keep the lights pointing at the fields. Mr. Johnson, who lived directly across from the park, was concerned about the rime the lights are turned off. When the lights go off at 10:00 p.m., the noise continues for at least an hour. Frequently the lights seem to be on to 1:00 a.m. He would have no problem with the weekend lighting but that the noise would still be a problem. John Rose, 7072 Jasper, associated with Citrus Little League. Expressed he would like to see the groups using the lights be able to turn them off and that the lights stay on until i0:00 p.m Monday through Saturday. Otherwise, the number of teams able to play would be seriously impacted. Jim Lan gl os, Alta Loma Little Lea gue> recognized there is a problem with the light being on, and no one using the parks. He stated that Alta Loma Little League would act responsibly in turning off the lights. Mr. Belnap, 8979 Alder, stated the people responsible for turnf ng the lights off are not doing so. The other problem is the high school parking on the streets. He would like to see the parking lot reopened for high school students. Mayor Stout closed the public hearing. After discussion, the following motion was made. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to direct staff to have an independent engineer check ways to hood the lights and establish timing procedures so tights will not remain on when park is not in use. Lights to remain on to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday -- Sunday use only by special permit. Staff also directed to do a study regarding parking at Alta Loma High School and to report back to Council when completed. Motion tarried 3-1-1. (BU quet no, Brown absent) ..+..+ A recess was called at 10:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:48 p.m. +...~+ • x + w ~ + H. COUNCIL BUSINESS H1. DISCUSSION OF SCHEDULE FOR FINALIZATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEW STREET CONSTRUCTIONS. Bu quet 110-10 STkEET PI City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 20 ACTION: To be discussed at goals meeting on March 12, 1988. ~ * x ~ + + H2. CONSIDERATION OF REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. (Buquet) (1110-10 STREET PI Councilmember Bu quet stated that meetings have been held with residents in the area and numerous concerns were zddressed. He was no longer sure it was worth the problems that the realignment is going to generate. Ne requested this item be sent back to the Planning Commis Sion to explore other options. Mayor Stout felt that no one was comfortable with the alignment but it appeared to be the only solution. He suggested that San Antonio Comaunity Hospital's application be accepted with the unders tandin9 that they are requesting an amendment to the specific plan, and that the specific plan amendment go through the Planning Commission process with an independent traffic engineer hired to do a study to determine if there are ocher alternatives available. There were three things he would like to see 1) maximize traffic safety on Foothill Blvd., Z) minimize traffic on Red Hill, 3) realize the parcel the hospital owns i5 important. rey.,..;tmnm~.er n~~~~mr unutn take the City to work more with Upland on this issue and open some doors for future issues, Councilmember Wright had a problem with sending the issue back to the Planning Commission. She felt it should be dealt with by the Council. James Markman, City Attorney, stated that by law this issue is required to go back to the Planning Commission, It is an amendment to the general plan, and therefore must go back to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Buquet stated the reason he brought this issue back to Council was that he wanted an opportunity to review this situation, obtain new information, have additional input from the residents in the area, and then have that information available before a commitment is made. ACTTOa: Refer item to Pl anr,inq Commission for an amendment to the General Plan. ~+r:*•• I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEAT MEETING None submitted. City Council Minutes March 2, 1988 Page 21 * * * * k * J. CDlMUNI CATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Diane Williams, 7251 Amethyst, stated that the Friends of the Library are currently conducting a library needs assessment. She asked that the City conduct the needs assessment since they would have more clout with the County. Mayor Stout requested a follow-up letter from her stating what needed to be done, and for the item to be on the next agenda. * : * e : * K. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to adjourn to March 12, 1988, Clarion Hotel, 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., for Goals Workshop. Motion carried 4-1. (Brown absent) The meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda R, Rogers 4rtinn r7nrY Approved: March 12, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned mee tir~g of the City Council of Che City of na nc ho Cucamonga met on Saturday, March 12, 1988 at the Clarion Hotel Ontario Airport, 2200 East Holt Blvd., Ontario. The meeting was called to order at 8:30 a.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Cou ncilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Robert A. Rizzo; City Clerk; Beverly .A. Au thelet; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Buller; City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Deputy City Planner, Otto Kroutil; Administrative Services Director, Jim Hart; Senior Administrative Assistant, Mark R. Lorimer; Resource Center Coordinator, Jerry Ful wood; Senior RDA Analyst, Linda Daniels; Building Official, Jerry Grant; Facil itor, Earl Goodwin. .. • .. B. PURPOSE Ine purpose or the workshop was to estaDl lSh goals for the Ctty Council. the following goals were presented for consideration. Changes are indicated in bold type. The first items discussed were the Community Values, City of Rancho Cucamonga. :.. + • . 6BMNUNiTY-VA6UK CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA ORGANIZATION VALUES We, the members of the City Council, City Commissions, and Professional Staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as stewards of the community resources, are dedicated to creating and maintaining a well-balanced community that is a safe and fuifiiiiny place to live, grow, work and play. We believe that this quality of life is achieved through our commitment to: PEOPLE We respect ourselves and, therefore, the people we serve. We care about the well-being of all people regardless of status, origin or personal beliefs. City Council Minutes March 12, 1998 Page 2 SERVICE We strive to provide unsurpassed community services in a fair, efficient and responsive manner. We stress high standards which encourage the greatest quality of life. LEADERSHIP We provide guidance and leadership on behalf cf the entire coam;unity. We value openness and accessibility and encourage Citizen input and participation. PROFESSIONALISM We conduct City affairs in a highly professional manner aaA-demand heaest~-amw'g--ear--a}eeted--and--aPPeinLed-s-f~ic-#als in order to encourage and promote public trust and confidence. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY We recognize that the City has been entrusted with the stewardship of financial resources which ri 9htly belong to the community and we value prudent financial management. P6ANNEB-BEVE6BPMEN7 PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE We recognize the need for we 11-balanced and Epesgh6awl:-develegxenE-eF resiAen4ialr-esianers#al-and-inAasBr#al-Proyer6#es-and-are-eenm#EGeA-6e a-E9mp Penen Sa Ye-QI dn-Oi--0aFdneee~-sere M91flerE- 6tl-Mleel- 411r ~1Ia11~+'s -area impaefs-o-f--ftlEare-growt;t co~prehensive planning for ail aspects of public services within the City of Rancho Cucaannga. . e . + + RANCHO CUCAlIONGA 2000 60ALS AND OBJECTIVES PROVIDE 6887 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES. The City's highesE-Pr ieri6y interest includes ae9-ealy law enforcement services, pew--provided--by--4he-Sah-B¢+ofardine--CewnLy-bAertififi's--BepartanenE r-~-alas serviees-prev#Aed-by-the-E-ity's Building and Safety, B#vis#en and 4he Emergency Pre oa red ness-Bivisien-eE-Adminis4raAien. The following specific objectives are identified for the departments in order to meet this goal: City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 3 Objective 1: E~pandReview need of Ehe Traffic/Enforce~ent Division to i•ne~nde-add it~ona7--eewremenE-anC--travntee-Lo--addFess-needed-enEereemenE meet needs of the coaaunity and report back 6y Objective 2: OeveloD a Biffereetial Patrol Response Svs tom ie-order to Nravi~de awintain quality service-at-a~-redBeed-east--to--Rho-Baiv Report back by Objective 3: 'e^pand Review the needs of the Station's Crime Prevention Objective 4: 1. Complete and i~pl event the Rancho Cucamonga Emergency Services Plan by . ~, 6entinue-eeordinaEien-o-f--Ehe-ea~er9er~cy--serviees-~rogranr-wibk p d ~-te - agene i es-- j~ i , e,- - Fe et#~i•1-L - ~i~re - Frofe e t i orr - B d sit~i e6 a Sheriff =s--0epartwterrt~--Feed-Lentivrl--B isEriet r-Lucaawnga--6eunEy NaEer-BisErieb}, 3. Es tab7-isJr-6iEy-Fmengerrcy--BperaEiens-tenter-fEB6?-at--esrperaEe yard, 4, 6ensinee-ex~hasi s-on•-6i•6y-wide-eMerge neY-L+,~i+~in4 ~nd-edveaEien Eresrdee65 -and-6 i6y-Staf€}, S, EsBabiish-Dregram-and-fiaeAadiies-fiorv 4fie sta~xle~of-supp•t•ies-and feed, 6, Estrblish--Pregraer-ior--eenMx>-ieg--SEaxe-isandated~-B45as~fes Si~aeiaEien-Sessions, Objective 5: Beve}e~-eeogera0ive-strateav Caocerate with the Countv of San Objective 6: serv «. ,.:.. City Council Minutes Marcfi 12, 1996 Page 4 BUILD A SOUND FINANCIAL BASE FOA THE COMMUNITY. in order to ensure the financial resources necessary to provide desired City services, it is essential to cultivate the development of a strong local economy with particular emphasis on strengthening of general use revenues. The following specific objectives are identified for City departments to Beet this goal: Objective 1: }, ERp dfl~-Ahe--B}6y~5--v}Si§i~-i-6y-2~MWlgfl-~Ie-fO1F1'•1-RRed-~15P-B~ AargeAed-adverAi•siRg. S, 6entinue-te--9artaf~ate--i+'-fEOnaei-e--0eve}epment -dRd--Trade eeRfereRees-AAaA-re}aAe-Ae-AAe-}eea}_eeenemy, 3, ERpa~e-the-amity-'s-tR~a4e-tpreugh-tJ~~xpanded-wse-e-f-video--Ear pnA}ie-re}abiensf9remebieea}-aeAivfAies, 4, Eflpaed-aRd-eehaRee-Ape-B}ty'-s-image-by-hes6}Rg-eeRt:erewaes-ar~/er meeAiRgs-AargeAed-Ae-tpe-profess}RRa}_r~}_esAaAe-}fldosAry, ~: EPA dfl :'2--AAf -EiiAy~i--{711dQe--A bP9fHJA--eaRA }fllfed-9di'Li4i~ati4Nh -}R }eea}-serviee-ergaR}xaAiees=-9rogran~s, 6, Esp}ere-2J~r-pass}Ai}ftv-o-f--adverAi•sfRg-~o--aAper-med4a--Erad•}e, be}evisieR), Objective 2: }, Beve}ep-a-Reeds-assessmeRA-sAwdy-Ae-deAermiee-ee~nmero+a}-Reeds of A ~--e eiRx~~u-R ~i-bY--a~d--Rra r#e t--~p•es-i-A~oR--ior --e RpaR d~ed eemaere}a}f}RdusAry-aeAivsty, ~. Be ve7ap•-a--bargebed-d-i~ree<-ma-ia--program-~o--aAAraeA-biiese~-ese5 ideRAif}ed-i•R-Ahe-weeds-assessnteRA-sAUdy, 3, Beve}eB-9o7~c~y--er}bar}a-regarding--EAe-u,e--ef-+4i~ect--f}Rage}al iRaeRAives-Ae-swpper6-ROw ~}ew!}ermeRA-eR-a-case-Ay-ease-Aas}s, 4, Beve}ep-a-grogram--iR-coRjeflet4ar-wath-State-and-federal ergaRiraAiess-Ae-provide-jab-bra}RrRg ~p~erAwevAies, City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 5 S. Explore--tpe--pess#pia-}Ey--ai--deve7op4+K}-a--s~naa-l--pdsmess dove}efinenE-program-Ee-ass#sE-new-sma}}-pus#nesses, 6r iargeb-dove]e$went-koward~-projeo-bs-wpiap--inca~ease-revenuer-yeEr de-aeb-wire--ezEees ire-genea~a}--fund-e~xpen9#Eares-Le--pe ma#nta#ned, F, Exsswrrge-tfie-6eve}ePment--ei--Eas#eesses-vfi~tar-a--=9uad-i~t~y" er#entaE#an-wpiep-cam}Loot-an-a9m#ssiess-far-qaa}#Ey-peEe}r-~saEe}~ and-eeavepEien-eenEersr-can-pe-Aeve}epeA-Ee-#nEreABSe-in6ir#Aua}s Eo-t pe-qsa l #ty-efi-a4ves-to• Banci~o- Lucamorga•r and.assi5E-bpe-6iby Epreugp-Epe-Eraos#enL-eeeupaE#er-Eax-r Objective 3: Promote the continued viability of exists ng businesses in the conmunity. }, Ass#sE-property-owners-fi+vmL+agoo-~FooE1~i-H-~oulevaad•-to-aPgraAe Epe-facades-efi-tpeir-prepert~es-tfiroagh-~Lhe-aonL-iaued~ ase-of -spa Bes#Hess-Preperty-lmprevemenL-6ean-Program. ~. Exp7er¢-Epe•-peseifi#}}Ey-o€-ea~ar~d#ng--Lpe-Bus-mess--PraperEy FmprevemenE-bean-?regram• ~Eo--sac-lude~aa6i,v~i-hies-no-E ~?orreob}Y-ant a-parEaf-Epe-pregramr-snap-as-ezpaostenr-re}ecaE#enr-ate, 3. EzP}ere-tpe-fieasibia~ity-o€..w'eabi~ng~a-State-sporzsored-goaraebeed 1aaR-program-Ee-ass#sE-sma}}-pus#nesses-eeos#deriag-ezpansiso, 06jective 4: Develop adsJ n4sbriaEive-Programs t0 satirize ezi stinn - - ~-~e}r-in-r'rs-a-seune-rrnane#a}-ease-for-Spa-BiW- }: Beveao¢-Bregrr~a~ss-whioA-a-1-}~ow--fop-men4tpr inr}~f-rcwerwes--Ee detewa#ne-wpa t-type-Of-dove-lopn~entf roe-Nx•~#LY'-s-pas#t#eoi Ee -ensure-saacs--an6-etper-taxes-axe-Ee# Rg-f~reperay-aeporWed-Ee Epe-State-and-proper}Y-erediEed-fs-Epe-6ityr-and-Ee-debewaine-bpe prgpesE-preAuai•ngr-YeEr-}ewesE-eesE-Aeve}epmenEs. 2-r 6entiaue-emphasis-en-agr~ess-fie--programs-fio--ensure-fiAH~-lasses sestarned-py-4he-T #t~ axe-aL-a-mia~imaar anG;4-reMicc-Epe-6#reeL espend#EUre-of-Biby-genera}-funds-for-#asaraneer-preperLy-Aamage~ were-related•-#njur#esr-aad--}#ay}}by-exposures-irhiae•-preEeeL#ng 6#Ey-reseureesr 3. Bove}ep-competer-systems-tfiat--a}Lew--forv-effie#esE-t-rack-#n+F-eS GitY_perg RNeir~apeed#Ebrei-and-genera}-aoE#v#ties, Objective 5; Develop along-lets financial Plan- • • ~ • : x City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 6 EN69URA6E PROVIDE PROACTIVE. RA}NER-iNAN-REA6TSVE-LONG RANGE DLAIilaIN6. Since the City has a significant investment of time and dollars in insuring the quality of all City services, it is essential that long range planning for the future of Rancho Cucamonga be a high priority. The following specific objectives are identified for City depart~ent's to Beet this goal: Objective 1; 6enL~i~ue-etommitment to quality Planning of all r,ew development. }. Empka~si-ae-Qlia-1-rbY-desi{~-aed-constraeLi vrr-a€-t+es~idertt~al--aeHd e ema~rei as--d eve-lo9menk--t-i~re sgk--eemm~ii~newE- ~4-Lhe~-currertk deve}e9~nenk-rev#ew-preeess+ 2T Empkas-iae-respeeE-fior-Lhe-eemxRHf46Y'-s-fier#Eage-artd--naEdra3 env#remaent• -~in--ihe-des#ge-o€-new-i~+'e:lects-,tYw~ouglr-esta4}Fsh#eg e}eser-eeer4#naE#en-a€-Ehe-deve}epiaen6-rev#ew-Preeess-between-spe P}ann#ng-6eaen#ssiee-and-N#sserie-Preservab#en-6emmiss#en.= 3, Ma#n>:a#sing-ee-ge#eg-eva}waEi9e-ef-eaisk#ng-deve}eB~nent-standards #er-the-pu~ywse• of•-imprev#nV-khe-standards-by~-whteFr-deve}ePmenL rs-eeeerr#ng. 4. Eva}aate-planned--}and-usesr-ard-densities--6#SY-w#de-arw}-assess #mpaek-en-#nfrastrevkure, Objective z: uuui~°~~« - ^^t `^ as°->narnvemeak-ef improve existing and older areas of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Retrofit existing development according to current planning standards. 2. 6enkinae-emphasis-9n-beau#+fiieaLdgrr of Beautify key areas within the City through more proactive code enforcement, capital improvement programs, and beautiffca ti on programs. 3. Assess needs and deficiencies of southwest. Cucamonga area and develop implementation and ff nance plan. 4. Assess needs and deficiencies of old Etiwanda area and develop implementation and financial plan. 5. Evaluate feasibility of revitalization of old Alta lama area, north of Oase Line Road on Amethyst. City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 7 6. Assess existing recreational trails system City wide and develop alternatives for supporting regional community }eea; recreational trails improvements, access, and maintenance. 1. Evaluate existing Tree Preservation Ordinance and develop new program for the replacement, wintenance, and preservation of all heritage trees. B• eaRE?Rae-lWIplldSi+,,--BR-S#TePgtiM?Aieg Strengthen the City's Geode Een forcement Rpro grams, including enforcement of regulations pertaining to property maintenance, vehicle parking and storage, sigma ge, animal control, dumping and public nuisances. Objective 3: Pursue the annexation of areas within the Citv's Sphere of Influence that warrant local control. 1. Assess conditions, opportunities and liabilities of potential annexation areas and develop long-term plan and annexation strategy rith quarterly reports back to City Council. 2. Pending any annexation continue to coordinate Sphere of Influence planning with the County of San Bernardino, property owners and other public agencies to promote development that meets or exceeds City standards. * * . + . . PRDVd-0E-MfCE.SSARY ENCOURAGE PROVISION FOR., SOCIAL SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE ~unnuni ~ r. "----- ii}REe-IRany-5BR}a}-se PV}Ee5-dPe-r55BRYrj•d}-ig-6he-qya}}ty-9i-}}fe -feP -PPS}deR65-bf RaReho-CUCama>rrga~--}6-as--esseRt:}a}-fior--Lhe-4i#y--to-gro~vwde--sash-scww~ees--as Reeessary, To be reworded and brought Dack to Council for consideration. The following specific objectives are identified for the City depart~ents to raeet this goal: Objective 1: Eymphas}ae-eemmi#ment--te Detenine the need for Child Care Services-6i6v-w}de. Identify existing child care services and assess needs for added programs. 2, Eva}uaer-fea si bi}ity-e{-eswba-isif}TM}4cve}opmy~ -fees-to-f}RaRae Aay-pope-Eae}}}}}es-aRd-Pregrams, 2. Develop alternatives to encourage child care 6y the private sector. City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 8 Objective 2: Encourageinq senior citizen involvement in Itev-City issues. }, Exp}ere-Ake-pess#A#}ity-e€-Ne}b#ng-EemaaniRy-€erams-at-tbe-RaneAe 6tleamenga-Nei gp4erheed-Eenter-fiar-~.irrz-Ao- address-Akeir-leea7 e}eeted-a€€#eia}s-en-tap#ES-a€-eera3ern, 2~1. Encourage qualified seniors to volunteer to serve on community groups (i.e. local commissions, community foundation) 3, Ewp}ere-Ake•-€eas~ib4-}-i-6y-o~-estah}i•spS ng-a-ded~ieated--senior Eetlne#}-er-Jsenion-advi sery-board-fa-address--issues-o€-spee+€#E EewEere-A6-Apis-AargeA-papa}aAisn-gretlp, 4, Pre v~idr-epPor{~rn#6#es-fior--}eea}_~~{Ed..-q€€ie#a}s-to--address sead~or-~ #E-i-dens--e~£ -tbe-to~smuni•gY--tprougp--es{ab}4sbed €wA}ieaA#ensr-pregrams-and-even6s, Objective 3: Malyze senior housing needs. • • : 6pNTdNUE-E7IWMSFS--0M PROVIDE PARK DEVELOPMENT CULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND RECR TON PRO6 WHICH MEET TH NEED OF THE COI~HUNlTY. 5 inee__#neerPeraAien{-ibe--6ity-hafr-done-an--euESEand#ng-~ab•-e€-acquiring--and deve}aping-park--si•Res---Ib-is-#~pper€anR-{J~a{--6Nrs-pre9ran~-eeat~nae--irr-€utnre years--anA#a--a}}-yoAent4aa--Parks--ideaAi€ied --iti--Ape-Ee~~--P}an-}niv¢-been aegtlireB-and-developed,---In- adGi{ionr -rA-is-egtlaa q y--imporAani--AhaA-reereaA#en prB grams-Ae--EBnEiinh}FFY'+'eera #tldced•-6tl--MC-eel,tiL-i~r -vise v- iiR--nvvvs-v+`--o~`.~ Eematlnity -are-Aeing aleA, The following specific qbj ec tives are identified for City departments to ^eet this goal: Objective 2: 6ontintle-eiseHas#s-en-d0evelownent of new park facilities. }. Prepare-a-dove}epmeaAffinane#pg-~lan•-for-i'ant+ad--Park.---}pis shoa}d- ins}ado-ne A-end y- cewtFrl et~on-of-mans-,-buR }so- a-speei €iE program-€er-€}naneing-Aka-dove}egnenA-a€-Akis-park, 2, 6enAinae-program-te-deveaop-a+wi~acqu#re~yark--s}Ass as-idenAi€ied in-Ape-6isy'-s-adepAed-genera}-P}an. 3, Mea+tor`-dour}opmeat--ef--spa--P•}anned--6emmowi-A~i~es-fia-assure eemp}ianee-w#AA-Ape-6sRy'-s-Park-requiremenAS. City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 9 4. Eva}daAe-9eve]epmewt--{.}arvs-a€-futur~y~ark~-s#tes-te-+~ ._-EpaE Apey~aeeA-Ape-inmed#ate-awd-}ewg-berm-gea}s-awd-epjee9#ves-a€-Upe eexmdw#Ay-Ay-Prev€ d€ng-adegdato- area-#or -0otJf ac-&itie-and-pass#ve aeA#v#A#es. 5, Work-w#Ap-Ape-sepee}-d#sAr#eEs-Ae-ewsnre-ApaA-€dAdre-sepee}-s#Aes €d}€i}} _ {{~-jo•inE-ase-aryrc~wenti--pY-yrev~ding-edegda;,e--Pre§ram space--awd--fae#}#A#es-ao--reAdrw-fiorv-dse-ofi -Ape-Git~y's--sPBrEs €#e}ds, Objective 2: 6ent4nue-emninrs#s-orv-re-f-i~r#ne Isprove existing park facilities. }, f'snE#wda}}y-r<vwaaeafie--e:r#ss#w9r-i~div-idua7--Park-fiacia-i~t ies--ts ensdro--Spat--Ape#r-des-igrr-cone#wdes-Lo--meeR-fiA~-weeds-of--gpe 6emmdn#Ay. 2. 6ewddeA - a--ee~n pr epew s i•ve - i+ev€evr -e € - Yfie -e wAs re -park- -dove }e Pn~ewA program-~n-cowjdne-~forr-w4Ap-a- ~erievr-e €-4he-~aecepAed-sEawdards €er-park-awd-reereaA}ewa}-aeA#v#A#es-Ae-ewsdre-ApaA-adegdaAe area rs-previded-€er-AeAp-aeA#ve-and-pass#ve-aeA#v#A#es, 3. 6ewA#nde-Ae-rev#ew-tpe-Park-awd-ReereaA#ew-a}emewA-e€-Ape-Gewera3 R}an-to- -ensdre-tAat--#A-fiulf-#las--Ape-sJrert--Aerm-and-Gong-Aerm needs-e€_Ape-6emeeR#AY: Objective 3: Evaluate and enhance recreation and leisure pro crams for community. ~, 6ent iwde--Le-access--Ape--weeds--a€--Ape-tomcod w€ty~-regarding reereaA#ewa}-and-}e#sdre-Pregrams, 2~. Work-Ae-€drAper-ewpanee -Ape-6#Ay'-s-reereaA#ena#-program-ts-ewsdre ApaA-#A-senf#ndes-te-meet-21~r needs-and deli-res-0€-Ape-res#AeoAs e€-eemnen#Ay, Objective 4: Objective 5: Proaate Rancho Cdcaaronaa as a reafonal recreational center ... + • . PROYIDE PRIMARY C[TY INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS TO MEET CURRENT AND LONG-TERM NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY IN DV NCE OF GROWTH City Council Minutes March 12, 1'988 Page 10 As Rancho Cucamonga continues to experience residential, Commercial and industrial growth, it becomes more essential to emphasize the need for an aAegua~r infrastructure to be build and wintai ned to accommodate greater demands. Consequently, the City is committed to addressing the public improvement needs city-wide in order to provide for a safe and comfortable environment. The following specific objectives are identified for City departments to meet th 15 g031: Objective 1: 1. Assess the effectiveness of existing street and highway system and report back by 2. Esbab}}sh-a Develop alternative methods to provide funds for the construction of the street and roadway systems as needed to meet the demands caused by growth of the community and report back by 3. Re-eva}sake Develop alternatives regarding City Council policy on phased construction of public improvements and report back by Objective 2: Continue to develop storm drainage svs tem which protects public and private property. 1. EsBab}tsk-a-system-ef Reevaluate and update Master Plans of storm drainage to guide development and construction of appropriate drainage facilities and report back by . 2. Develop options pf appropriate funding mechanisms to support construction of needed facilities to keep-pact-wiRH-6he-grewEh-oi Eke ^eet needs of the community and report back by , Objective 3: Develop comprehensive policy and plan regarding installation of underground facilities of other public utilities and report back by Objective 4: Assist in the Aeve}epnept. Dlanninq_.o f_ pu bl ic_ utilities. Maintain-a-$regram-efi-coopera24on Cooperate with the focal water and sewer district which protects the public health and safety in a cost effective manner. City Council Minutes March 12, 1968 Page 11 2. Request Cucamonga County Nater District to reevaluate their eeR6inuatren-efi-~GfAi6'i policy of permitting the installation of septic tanks above Banyan Street. 3. NaSetaa-o--a--pre graxr-€er Continue prograss for replacement of unsightly overhead utilities with proper underground facilities en-a}}_Rew-dove}epreeR6s-and-reeen58ruetieR. • . a ~ . . 68N;INUE-;G PROVIDE A SAFE AND EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION NETNORK NNF611 TO SERVES THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY-IN- -S FE-ANB-EFFFGiEN;-MANNER. R s-wi-t.h-Lhe - aeeb-Ee--prev~i.ie-for--aR- adeQuate--tn i'ras2iveLUr+cy--it--is--a}se essevt-ial--t}~at -EThe City is committed to a transportation network which addresses the community's traffic circulation concerns. The following specific objectives are identified for City departaw:nts to a~eet this goal: Objective 1: Evaluate critical traffic problems. both existing and potential and include report rith annual budget request. Objective 2: Establish standards for develee}ne-ef- a street network to Objective 3: Objective 4: Continue tg support the development of the Route 30 Freeway and other regional transportation corridor syste~s. Objective 5: Develop a transportation management program which supports • • • ~ r ~ DEVELOP AN ACTIVE PROGRAM OF LEGISLATIYE ADYOCIICY. The-&iEy=S-operat~iorrs -gad--pubT}e-~pol~ieaes--are-ofien~ oeeis:eas$f34at2~and-Fedorak-}ee}^}aEtlreS-a=?-a?-3-resu RaReho-6weameRga. City Council Minutes March 12, 1988 Page 12 The following obj ec ti ensue areis identified for City departuents to seet this goal: Objective 1: Continue to implement legislative affairs program to address State and Federal legislature impacts on City. }-. Aefive}y-Asaek-prepeseA-iegisaat4oR-wh icir ~nay~-impac2--khe-Gi6Y~e€ Raneke-6weaalenga, 2: PresenL~-tes-t-i+ROny-zo--7egi~rl-a6ive--eenlm~i ttees-err-}egis}ative Brepesa}s-Nhiek-impaeA-Ape-6iEy. 3, 6eRtiRUe-empkasi s-on-eeeR-<ommunSta~t-iar-wPEh-State-anG-FeAera} 6 egis} ators--AO-iv~di•eate--Ake--6 } Ay! s--pesi Lion-orr-B+^oposeA }egis}aAieR, 4, faRAiRue-eeaBerati•ve-re}aEiens-wstk-S6a6e-anA-FeAera}-6egi•s}a5ers A9-seek-assis-tancrivi3h-peteRAiai-aegisadt4oR-~vhich~ynaY-4eRefil Raneka-6ueamenga. 5, geerA}naAe-}egis}aAive-advseaey-~ifia~ot,M.v~~+ub}iG-aQeRe ies-whi•ek a}se iRay-Ae-ARlpaeteA-by-prapaseA-}egis}aAien. 6, Werk-w iAA-prrvate-seetsr-(•Bui}Aing-FRAustry r-CAanlber-el;-6elnRereej Ae-eneeurage-supBerA-eE-key-}egis}atieR-wAEek-imBaets-9ke-6i6y, x • + ~ • ~ 1MVRUYt IN[ uUUNUiriNTi uii 8r' :wLIC S~""•ree w,ru apc wnT ppDVT0f0 DIRECTLY BY CITY. MaRY-ofi -RaRelw-Gucaaw»w;a-'s-BuA}ie-serv-ices-are-irrev~i6e9--0Y-e9ker-{~uW~a-aRA 9rivabe-ageReies-A9-resi•AeR6s-wi6h}R-Eke-seR~Rwnity r--SiRee-Ake-6iEy-i•s-seReerReA wiAh-tfie--}eve}-o-f--services-previ9eA-by--Akese-ageneies~--i-A-maiRAains-~a-streRg aenlR iAmeRA-i:a-tea-Brag rdm-Of-401lfr1rR10U5 -mafliAar iRg )- eYdiwati aR-~alid~-66aPAYRaA 18R wiAh-AkeSe-pray}AeP&, The following specific objectives are identified for City depart~ents to neet this goal: Objective 1: Continue emphasis on previA}Rq ensuring the provision of the 1. Cable Television 2. Refuse Collection 3. Library Services 4. Water Services City Council Minutes March 12, 1968 Page 13 5. Fire Services 6. Animal Control Services 7. Pmbulance Services 8. Sewer Services 9. Health Services 10, Weed Abatement 11, Oust Control Objective 2: }, Eva]uat~-feasik4}i•6y-ofi -ws}n§-redevrlopment--taw-~i.~c~es~tt--te des}Qn-artd-eeasErueR-prarep-}}prary, R, ReaepaQreemen6-w}i:p-6ewnBy-Ee-steep and-a9mini•s6er-pranep, Objective 3: Eva}uaEe-#easiptiity-a#-~-ci~FeeEp}}}_ti re Rre6eebien-Bi56rieE Coordinate and coocerate rit other ou lic agencies. 1. Seek District concurrence. 2. Seek impartial analysis by local Agency Formation Commission. 3. Evaluate reports prepared by LAFC, Ralph Anderson and Associates and City and District staff before making final determination. * • • k Y R At the conciusi on of the goals session, the City Council requesteg some additions to the goals which had not been included. Councilwoman Wright requested that something be added regarding a commitment to recycling and solid waste resource Conservation. She also requested something be added regarding historical educational information, and to Snclude under Law Enforcement something regarding response times and enhancing the image of law enforcement. Mayor Stout requested that there be a City Council goal, something which states, "to focus on vision, long-range planning, and policies necessary to guide the City of Rancho Cucamonga into the year 2000. ObJ ec five 1; Direct Citv Manager to monitor, track. and evaluate progress on all decor imam eh iar t,iVeS contained in this document. Objective 2: Provide Citv Council with executive summer progress reoorts twice yearly." City Council Minutes Marth 12, 1988 Page 14 Mr. Wasserman stated the next step was to take all the comments, revise them, and then staff will come back with an implementation document with time lines added. Staff should be able to bring the document back to Council within 3 to 4 weeks. • + * « . e C. AGJOURMMEMT Mayor Stout adjourned the workshop at f:40 p.m. Res pec tfulty submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Llerk Approved: p p O O O O O O O O p O 1 a¢ 1 1 O i O ~ i i l ~~ ~ i ~ 1 6 =i ~ Z ratPNmrmnryrynyPrpyO nmlrarymarn +1 u~aPOry L nP PPPP P.n ..Yla aa~rvNNWnrymmYY M'ItJNNIP NNN Op .OpaampmYYTammmm.moyp "<L! OrO.r.~n.~.~r.~.~.~.~..~.~.~.rnn.~~nnn.r n...~-i n.ayti N.annn.nnn~r r~ U i i ~ l ~ l i~ l i 11 l i ~ ~ ~ P O b S a P P P p P O 2 r h a a s 2 U2 L _ Z t 2 V Y W~ Y Y Y ~ ~ Y > ~ 1 1 1 7 ~ 7 ? > > > ~ 7 U V_ ~+ _ rn + V O Z Z O V ~ U V o °¢ z Y .. m { ? Y ~ a i u z s i a ~ u° s z Y p i a< m s o i O V L m < K p 2 V Y< 2 ~ O _ _ < Z ¢ O ~ V _ K _ m u O < LL H w O ~n V 0 N U r<< l TTrT>T)T ~niNCm~'iiem~i ~.I nnrn mn O~PmYTOr-• rFrDn>0f1r'ZZmDP mm~mCD~1n~Om2rr3m zmirTSOVii "mmzm O~< ZP2 nN1 nN P< mm ~r oNCmr i~oc ~ m ri °o ~m m rnrs r ~o ni.+r z z me n pA P • n N (t yN . D YW wm -d N YN Pr ~n 1. r O L O m W 1. °A N(1 Z> P n n fl A co >i oz v i ~ °m r r> Pm n 4 A Sr T' (fin C O n n< ?o '° o z ~ o i O_f O O r F ZO Y i on m$ m y z i r zx z °o mf3 ON p O O 1 -2YZPTmmmA2 ti~nm 1.( r r nA^m9~ITn VZ;POOmmH T> 9n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y mr°SY~no m<ip<ni°Nr ~~ mT z z x z x z x ~s -~z z.im.Q r n co i rr mN Tn N PN n-'.. ix $ ~ n n n n n to ODOZm A,Ty ZPNi m Tx °r ~1 j[ F f F P R 1 i~r 1Pw SY2Y -~ S m VS OS T p 1 In n GZNnO OKmr O r> T T T Ip m.(m TOO ACT 2M2 n ZZ mL<TCRCZ C m O PC Pr w w T 9 S + ' Y T ~ mC2O2~ 00 C S v~ ) 3 nKnnN°~".,TP Yn P n nx > n ~ O ~ O O D ~ omDp°~° r r ° xa?2. n n i x~ x DNDDw N P P P A ; "~ ~~~ - n eym - o `o P P S '[ Si YSr N w L m r v. v~~n v~ w ~n T i 1 1 n NNNNNr-- 12 NNNNNNNNNNN Nr~r PPm > dmPY r000 ~P 2 dPP0P6mmPmm-~-~r~-I-I--ir-I~PPPPPPPWP TpNNVi ATP Pn Ord CaYPma. u~N~+Odm-1P UTw rOdPJPUfw ~n Odr ONr~m~l ~1Pw ) ~i a iz n o + o m ri~N~ a No r(%n WP1PNOPr ~*O ~~ .f N YOOOLrNOmdO VO O O P O O wOr0wmd0VON0"GOwP d+ Nm 00 r O O m° w w z OOOrvO{.OOGOp060pnO b0~+0 •~n^QU'.nNm.ar NO^a ~+inOnPO OOnrvPmm6m000O00NJrvOPO+00O pa-^'U+ OOm..mnVrv n. rON+'.OS +P.[a 'n nPrNOwn nPyrNm+ry O~n N PYaw n vO~+NmrymPr N m m a ^ NOP 6 n N .a N .4 .• n .• + n ?~ V PO.+NVn u'Pd Oppnrvm .r O R ~ PPPPPmPP000DOOpO00~+r-+.+-a~nr~nrOV rvNNrvNNNryry~m Y uNNNNrv.vry {~ rvNNNNrvNrvNNN N.vrvNNVNNNNNNNrvryNNrvNryNnNryNrvrNNrv 21 NNrvNNNrvrvNNrvNryrvNrvNNrvNryNNNNryryN~vry NNrvNNrv rvNNrv ON. y ) i i i S 2 p K n4 h r cK2'¢ G 1 R m ~ zL r.L..x. x,. x j x#F L z M 0 o`a c~ .apo ~ cs - a .. z a WW <V fuyWrv W Zj uMW W = V -. zw o.~ Nm i w r w "' ~..M ~N y < m2p i .L- L 02Z~n ryLZRN OF V Zr Z 6 J K m7v~ww Y ra `-y •+W LCl YG m m p 1 NY}<O[ oVSW ^nZiV ~R2Q>W^ yu h Q~K W V Ri w-aW +S~SZVOF>tJ Y2l r Ip 6F~+p /. OJ „i w~Qa-Y66LpLLU.~ Cw`OSYrw2 Z 26wh V K JGI~-7 2 Su •+u r. OIVOt~ L 26a-S w~^oa KCKN Yin Y. w.n m_Z~-u... Qtw^W ZK~nm v .(nZ UO.•a<uW6.~~t r2 <~[ m}jwr~-_^' w__pE~ O JN6rrawnrwuS 3 u Y (OQ lifN 3 wJ ~+L ii VpN W N <wa-2R ~~ V•-.w O r2YV wKC7JrRS w VOKORL~Naa 1-m~n W'(iQJ p„~L ~~+<O¢Q w-~ iJaiawwrmi prw 2~Nm R uu.P 7.il J[Z}LLL~n.w Ow r• oiv'Vhw2vZ2Hm61-r Ov. LLtipi2QUw<~ruNy6vpww<wJOQ}KLG<2<•U-~~•P>2u0 'V ~av Tn`. ... mL mUNV VaprjUK6mKVR'[06tiaL•+l~nOrpr;m V_ r2 r V Z9 > U Y 2 t ~ u .. ~,. i ..~ Um 2 wK z~ ~Jw Y i oo z w V•+P pOp vi J ` O CWO 2 a- Y CS 2 wZS < ~ <WYNV -LF JmM2 6 S 06_ w ¢ b S r2~ RZ~- w0 O~^FU ~ an 04J >V < w •W wF O ~+ <r3NIh VRJ RI^'V % n1y~ 2.2•. 2~~ 12N>Oa^O K KU ON WO} Y _4 Z2 «5 V.p}6 pa ha'Or+K w~.Nw VOwJ 2 ~- Fw wOw N •rZm JF Or..a'f1 p'O UpQmRJV~Y pY~ ^ J 2^ 3w ^Uw{ m {K 2V< Tpw{¢ __ 2M1_ O QSZY Ova Uw„r+ Orll<Y U 4Y1nJy >OY Ow iwJV~JpNt Y 2L2JJVFKn •Y VmOJW2 mV6 6Y2 RwKNm6 m6 O WVp•+•'1W 6JVaZZ2VK{w LwaW ^GU wOY3w • n• m V22r wp00 pOV~ 4KNY mVR•np ^S Vf6<M» ~-j i J7J .r LLGwy O<w 400 YPYw • UfK}w{LiLLaWt[rt t'l ~J •<2V F'1-KiK r NZanb~n Y[N Wf ~nIJ<1~-~-~-ZUiiia-2JVUV }•nmj<'-VWOOrw wi m01'J JJJ • Uwarvr<00000<O '.J aJI< OY< m m BmmmmmVVUVVVUVUYUUVVVIUVUU U'pY1000400mW YI Nry OF Uf V.aN +rydma'NNLL1mTP ~+ p.admm wl.+NPYNFPP.n drm apm NNNrv+OmoOm+1-M1+mWmmOmmmmmuapN.amOOfor+a •n a POr mmi(fN Nrn.yNPd+ PmdN^a W,yd r C Nn dNNNP 3 WPITN drP-IPd-1Pr6 WyPYNddOfrJPPfy r-IP pP m~Td d YP+rW rydr d~-O~YP W+W i06mYNPwOdmmN N-Imp-INN4 ON-I OBIT+WNNNrn Nf1-~1W prw+. ~IPOdJIwWm-IfWW~I 1 ~) 1< x2 A2rr>nmv~3 ~n2 ni 00000nOOtnmSWTmmm 1 y TANnmMO}22r>. Sr yOrmmmWiOmrm)r>N ' m m 2pGOm LSTrAm9TT>2022mnr > OrrZ N N > _ Op2rrrN>yTOmr.r s n OrrmrrNOA r 02 2 mCl>aa S ArZ 023a T }K i Tr T S2>A021D122> 2> Ar » v. Z r ~~ P Or ~nr Or 2 CO m m> Om vim ZZr opoNnm T>~TnrT<SOSmAn Amir > nOrOrrO- rOTnnmSA„m•>y00Ty0{r>ZC pxmmmr m~mr 2n1 ~n O mm x- xmt >ncmm o ~ zr xzoPr r..y w nnn Szsxz srzAxrrA nc m zoTOT ozzN m x}~r`° N"T } n nny ~a i mNm }ia zip°tKri m . ._ T ° ss vc ..<mx m m ~ rssr N '"' ~ A c ro o n - T ri ni)n o onzrA T m T i L '°- Nz m... N nm nnV.o i.n..n. mz n a AA T z ry o < >r )n 2 Aa 120viN O Tin (1 m n~~ i° W N2 n 2 - o i < n m z > >OTmm~3TOmArDnr>Spnr~rm Oi9rmyAOnp3> <vi2<mTNd~AmTN Tin T2NTrTyNm NG21~dTWr~u19ATn0 TZn Zp)Zp;A(m1C Srri ~°n ~n i+C922A»Om pHA Zrxnr9rympmT=^O^~„ rCr )OnNTr>-~VA(~°v~(C'INT<mi nT(C1T~Mtm>Nf01NmOmTmAT O~mr-ly AZ1 OZyy)y> SryN..1A-I~+SGpwy yin Ain mO n>DOy rlArmpAxOl- mCf.003)AC W=my>Ar A A20 yv~2ZA M2N9 A_OT 9 AS p2 y2> OTmVrn C G pmA~ Tm OT1Z> r Tm In ~K ~"~ O f_ K n0<mKm r Omgmy m p.( mm O 3 mOTaT~ VA P N O Z 2 C CnmG r YZ~ y y yT-1n 9[ K) mn G ~n Z Z C y -I nn r n n n n~ ni n-T. oc ~ nA ~ of m z ~ i in ° iii a AZ T A3 A n ~. m O W in in W H W W n vN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIN VNNNVNNrvuNNNi 1> > NNPPPp`WpPPPNNPTUmuP~t;;s aN.;;i+;wwWwWwww T n v.y-OdP -~P V. N~-O dO YP P;WNrOdmyPIT;wNnOdm-a P In n wN ~• 2 ~ > ~s -.oN Us -JPrw iA m PWP+WON-1r NPd0.'+ POW+mr r+ wOPO rOP OPti RNVO + -OVOVNONrNO+ NOOPUOd f~TPPOUP U.T; U+OYnU+O PNOOO OITnO+OVJVyOWOOITNOwmOOLdOwOOdOPONNPNO 1 1 oooooncN ooopoPOOno>oNOmaooooo p..~oPm onn,.~ponoaotnoNnorpw-.wF000an~~olnnooo~oh.~. -goo ono oomyN~o ~ ~o~~-. oo movoo ~ :.a .f :N r-.~I ..r .-in N m .v ~ P FO^PN Our PO^nmw mmawa~mPPPPPPpPPP0000pOp000~-~rvm NNNryNNNN nNNNYNnnNN T~ Nn NNnnNnNnNnNnNNnhnNryhNrvrvnrvrvNnrvNNNhNNhrvNry Q rr r~ r wu Y Z F z I xa ~ ¢ ~ ,.~rcu rs FL < s n Lx wiYw x 00 CU wU ~n O p! Y.n O~n .'.~ Om Z VJ m0 WW IFWV Yz LL R6p FI r u2lw~tiw uL LSd zw i d ~y=NEW LPN woz~ra 'zw _ _ ___ f0 v~u 0Y0Yal NYU Fivipw Vwww wyti0 VGA NK~76wS~SOULO 'ZV ~OLO~NwOF ~wdN< J<w "mu~tU2 w~nn w6 f_wiy00JNU02LK yQd VF66=F1620L1>w¢> wZ6FiL wLr2V V~nw~p a]in .+V wa w w66VFwdN6w ~ ~V ZZUKN r(.^. 1-ZNVwud wnuN P7waV.~.c ~n JNdJ<r<Z U~n~¢pYa¢Fr+LL ~]w2~+~-r v~27uU u. ZVF2m YdF~n~i~w~N9w~i rv.-rr r-~Y '.)a 7_r _ LOrOON~wO<~-YU~^r2R-~ K au d'w Z~V OZLUV <XWwZw 2i-SO Zr~ON6rd^WttQ~Udp r~rv~=mrv2in j wwttTriO ~-~v~62 Zr+ <Lf[SUpd6L3. ~n6L 2 r~ wE >Y Z rt wi0 O > 1yr I O ~ Z d0 ~+ C .pZ ti6 rV V w LLV L dUwO OG m2wr i Y> i ~ a ...» V K Z~f K .p Un'w^VZ 3 - N Ew r~ d ~FW~OW~~~- ss -~ K O _ V wVd„J s=0wl w2 ZNf fw YZ wo20 J WJFI- S <_ r.: r.w rr Z >_ _ z Iv > ~+ U yr b yr ~n w SnIOw Y< =t OI+ 2F SO p'r wwZL3w UtJLY fWOYFZ~.~wy Y JOZ 6 ~~ OOTwV2dOV O W wd •] rv ~+ VLLw2NwwJO U'< LFf O LUTrv02wOUJJ2 BONUS d m:YWOOZ FVSZwwL Z LOr Kwt dJUUO> X ¢ UU<v~ <f zY{ iZZw UQW 2f 2rnww}~<Y~ ~. fs~ss.+xz z=~>'' mwFOd~u pzzwWdz wYo ~ u FwuwiiN.p.°~a< x..z «i.eFwozz oxL F uzudamFa~YZyoumF~FO uwz ..uuuzdF „oF ZO iwauo m w ~.<.r ~rii~uii<pz°uz~z~~zacood<a ad<n <dn~dunoagda<a y aNWOOwm.OgOf ryanPmmmFPNNYFOYPNAF^I ti.-IryNPN N.nP dl aPPFYnryF ~fNy~f.yFPPPFPOFInNPd~N.+OmrvtiMFFYHNJ~1f~ T I OPd „NOFgFa„yNyymFrvNPf NF FfFm~rry ~O~mNP PPPJOdNPN+POfyJON-IW-1w WWPw1.P PWNrOPN -10-~MOYP~ yPNNrOP NOV -APP YI-f JrONw-I r dONmyn•W JWmJ++OrmdONOdJJM W.pV JWPNOP wO NX%lS3NpZ {Y{Y n<CCCC iyNNNNNNNN>t,pnpp>y a a>rATmN%ANISn~NN<TT>CCCCCma OSZN« rySC roZ P~rSNXaTymr l-1 Y• _____ _ _ 9XN20 Op mT Nrni )[ p NN •pQ nmzMZym-z oo3Gnmcsrmmmmm> N naN On> - 2 Sy2•~ypapyyP •y n'I>m OroZN~TSOFA C » y 222Z2}n~200myNyn nam•+ I.I ra nIf NYC Ky >-I mm y C mOmyZ~~i ZZT2 yYZTUNi N2Y)Y>tiCNm P>n pmm0 r2 rn P~'• K «~r aQmlp m- > po rrln m O rn~O zmnONl-i0 r 3aNn v'-Ij~n t OOOOSn y9Z<Anm <Z > STO Snp 2Pppym 11.11 y S N OOJ[n> 3SZ2mr NC••~ m< > m N n 2aTi2~ ran mYyN9T 2 <j SO 1 v s~rmmex no 9 a^ OO pr.l OZ 2 N n> < >nocon o n P z rozzz - n m nvnnl m>oo z :t~ O W K m m Y n zsmiio m.°eoo>m..yacc°oelN.~'~°c°.d.:ilN.l as°~r('i :.S.~i.m.s.y. Imp. `> i c inia yyznv.z~. mmz<pomP zzJ .-aaa I IOCm~mNy Ory-m Dpti C•rnr maZnnnN)p~Omni >mna OP N(~n>ynZnmia> 2C9GaT e'{Y Nm1yNyNNmm»nl+mwyNOODmme2 nam m~+9 I S CaID m y yyN -1 SINy~O np0 Pn> NZTNp >>am9<rln m wm p n0»< m< ONOpN~0 mOf 20 •+Oy PPmyrvlmm m OZm r2rT Pn22mm3_2~-•>P SDN -I N r jmOmmNi Nn P.<m Pyy m< a •N+mPNy IP -ni ~"i ac <n n~ mzm >m y ~z O < 1 m0 y Nn A N nm m0 -• 2 ro n Na ~ n -• mym n n nnn mm~ z 00 .~ c~c c o coo no o io xx and 3~3 x 3x2 <m :x: ~ TP O P p a a aPa aPa nJ t3 S Z 3 ZZ ~2 m NNNNNNNVNNNNNVVNNNNNNNNNNNNryNNN NIN.•N NN IT dR-IP N.n wvrOdmJP N~. Nr•O.Np Ny JPm+w N~-'O dmtiP Na. w N I+ v N W r Nr POOH NyfPOdNPWNO v O-f10rJPJOPr~+O•oOPar +OPOwwvNmf NOOP Om wr~O m PmONJ.N NOmPOP00000mUNOOPROM 20.O J.OmmOmWO ONrOOPO a o ao a~n rvomwrvooomroN mmNOOOOmoorvo 0 o m marvow NohmN..oamao WrN-oohoooooaorrv o .o rlnm ~ ~ rvm r,n ,n l-ooimowm.uFimYr^yrFl-.o ~ P I 1 P yriN mrP w0 hn~mPlN.hi w r < ¢ I 1 4 2 1 I nr N y f O V J U Y ~1 21 NI S~ z a s 0 m I W T y N < m 4 i' mp0`OwNmr4lp OwNmv N.ph mPO wNmrmaFmPOwN mr nmmooww.rNNN NmNNaa maaaaaaahhhhmmmhhhmmmmm NN ryNNryNryryNNNNNNNNImVNryNryryNNNryNryryNNNNhNnNNN NNNNNNNNrvryNNNNNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNNNNry m NL040 O 7 Sw L w L wW V i N m U 1 uF i N ry w~~ ~O.ai n w~ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Nrnpiw ~~ wON ¢ NwN~~ „W p o t\ 2 J`t xwl i WZllmn j J •h WxPl-~lln in w Ft~ ! Um OV:ryO n O 60mmWm ,<jONO V W ZWVW~NlW~y W W¢ml`3 <Wo ~ 2 ¢ NJ N F h w > U¢ JP<V m_1-WWryO <_wN „ J L N jS wNj40~N •m 2M OWW<w r2iN J m ¢< 01- F6~0¢6l V4Yf[ fL m m r < ;~w O wVW¢WYW6 u uo ~~~~<~. ~~ e¢oa44uW N>tooWO<N<o" QU64~ WF~OLdOLWOW «V~wV Zwmhl O a S O LL< OiuON Y¢O I- ONVMWOh ~ > Y N¢VUw ~~l O2Y O.~W .~2V~-F46NwV.a~ymFmW w V nn00=F N Uw w ¢„wN .nL JWJJJJ¢¢\VY > Z SS<hh« <l<7<¢O S u V WW ~ O_>Vy0¢<1.-¢yJ O~ mmmm rl-sr0 V V u ¢wwwn '.46~wY1n0<J m.. NUS-~-h ~-O y O O S O F w ZN¢~Nwwww¢~00 r m w<NKWS O=Wm .~ 7¢4 K » 04NN~N¢IV26 j ° N > S~~O<~ GNW>40.~rW '>W4wwN0« ¢F<4 xLL1. GGW<O GNN¢w Ommmm<6'>NV V V W u u z "' o z a ~N o a x ~.... J ~ ~~w s~y~uNU moz ou,i zxzox W.-m« x J w Nw2 6VJ W¢f ~OWW ON<¢N <Z w,u U ~ Y O < SM 4~L mF 2 <~'V 6L~"~UmONWW2 z .. fFU¢j,w «V~ FVW6h¢yOjW U~¢uQiN¢r~`JJ O 4 C > FV¢O <f it<l<Kat« tm imi ioomUUyU ± T P ' O~p lerlp ,yO wFNmrom~praP rharyhYmhm wNNNnrmhtlFpNmOh w N O N rNm~~m r.f»aw ^OFmm w O„hI'~h mw~w 1 / r!}'P NPV YPmNryP~~WV mPOnYr+ mMm W rPNPaP-Iy I+VIPNNNy.a-IW POPa mmPW..IWWW~P NOP 19 1 uOm}Wq}PWaPraWWWPmJy P-IN }m~yPVMNwP00°wmONr I~ N W TT'nT TpT~mymTTmmOOOmPO`OOOOnnnnnnn tfnnnnDn Im p pD gr.T>m jP/O»>mOr+p mml»> CcCOOOOO Or+T TO> le ry~0<rNr'TMONNN2 YfIM nymVirTNn(l9ZYi32 K22m'q 1 03 TAI+ NSy y-12 SnFn >^IKN9991aH -ITm 1 oam)I' .y mmi ily4w KCNnm /[oYS OcccCCPbam I Nmy3» mN3 >)~ NOmO Orn jOpylrr NCI .n tiN'Tyb 1 w c'>s rN'z nr°-nn<NZ n-'z $NN ~'n iN MI2i.igsamTraPbGn2>b I o o~<AVF~ Nnm~°TN Zii:.i F o Az~9nnmimmmor'.IZ Nip i T o i°m~ >mo °9 i€'nni~o z~~n mi~~°p°o«<N m= v~ i s y P)Nb N. > > mN-Im<zx9~ N N r D - 9NS y mp iA mr >• nn~a ~ m m 9 .. ^m b yanTHy m mmmzNa z i ni m n<24nzm n y z z inoq o.. znA nnn>o z A n aq n i snn m OOOA2 N v ~'n°i ° °c imOA i .°. n oN N I > N q T ~ N z N ~ s r~ < z v y n ~ ..< n •[ D 9 Z.. > Z T > 9 nn Z N r = • T n N P 1 4 2 1 n y, 1 TpNy<GTibnYCpC~aya)~r£bOTn ArYnTp<O>mSN>TNI-/jTT I 9TnOTT9ram0)DO'TNrTTT[1"I+b T2TyN2a 9(1m TM9NS2 ~ yK mmf~AOmTArr~ Oi OTSm nA>Ty02'1 ArpF]LON 1/ 29N>- T ~-('T OmmA>yNZp9r r~ZONCrI .YgTN2 ti AS HN iMN ayymM CA»91mT OTT 2m>Z > m >NNm •l .4m N~tb n0 m.+Trr A >yt92 Tm AmTmd1A i 2 O-I yI 2mnn2mq>ONr rl~ mm2AmTZ m< D>a =r ,O OTTjPyY N2rm O ~ TO wm 1'rb A 10 } yTTNi JI r l'rN N00< yny a3 Y~rTZ i NONTD 1 nn'am nNyy)n-1 TO 1 m^Orm Cn YN yZN 00 y 1 > 00 2r> Cx !~ -1pZ>nn 2 111CnCpAA AS O gYD9ZFrZAmr1 T2 ;a O}ONyTON (~I ) OY1L m~m> 2 T)1M ]pK 2CWyq~1 p~T xm pT9t AY111})R YIC C y`Jmy2mT 1 S 1 O 1 m pm >P)YT 'WI1~Yf m11r YI" 2 mMGDO >2 }nl 1 r- iM C I ml"'c 2NA iOPTM a Npz mr~~91 p O 1 N90 >Yr m- • PT ~ M T 2) am sbT y mm zz.a pmy I•i ~ V o z/°nr brm~ A N i°mr.n+~ >il~lrm 00 a1' 9 12'AO m<f W~ i ~ mm n=1 mn~>o nnma~m:~no TmnTmm` mmmn ir*-Win i °.' ~T q >° ga~~rpyaos °n o~ o-'°~bobb o Wy i b YN Irc r-limyc wnr n-+yy ~+ ~' xm ~° miao re mm NmWrm° AnOTmT'~ mxmm m om I ~ 9O Nf DP DAD ~-ID~PAA Oran APPA * ND ; a _ N r'^O /P MM n T TT T_ CT T_p y1y11 ~T• TTT h ^ 1 2 p N N NNN xNY > ~.j.. AN NNNN N M ° ~ 1 n NNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN li C NNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ;> > }}}}!}f1.}Nw~Y}}f}f,,ii + WWWWwWWWWWw a 2 Vi Nj.WNrNr///r 00000~lq SSgaeodaaaaaammPOm Ip O OaPyPm}WNI'Oam VPm}W NrO.OPyPPf WNrOLmVPN 1• ~ > IL I> o Wr IA ) q !W/WUpW}raYWNrOrNP~WWPOWNNPpPaPNaiwN}+m• ID T OrPYI-IOOPIWPWNO.~}NPVO-IOr O~`O V'+lmNN}J.N m}}NOY ly N O+POON00000 Of ONr°+000OOa0000PON0}NPwOPOWOOp 1• 8 olP-Oa OO N. I°n o~°~°o.°.o ~Orn-i°°°oor°o °o ~°n m.omoFO°o wo°o elmn °o woooo ,.. z~ ommnl~ ~~o°n rmmnnmm~m n.d.N moPtii°o.P•r~~n°F•.imnlm- +Omm~ .~ r ~Pm•n PFN O ^ s i n, .. -. °' i ~ v .. ... r a m PO•+N NarmPO .~ NanmPONnm+N anmPO-.rvNl.ma c ' nYrvinmm+ln,mm~~..ml:~ilr+r+rrNNNNNNNNNwa~a~a~i ¢~ r! rrv+vlr+: :rr:r:v:r+ < l~ hnNNNrynNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNryN j 21 hNNnryNNNNNnryNNNNNn nNN NNrvNrynNNnryryN NNNNNNNN V NnN _ _ _ __ Z _ ^LY _ d L > S _ + a V 6 r r nr OMB r 2N a •+¢aaN N a Y 1< ry¢N\6 wmN W¢.n•41 Ja ¢¢ __ dNw N[[ N_w F'ON V_w ~.~ pw_ __ 6N NJ i2i0 •Y 0 L r T 6J oo ,m u n z a as.-iwr wi+ xr - oFN,~, r a 4.+ "'a'-1- J ° i ~ Duo .~om~ oo J ~WW ry~u,z°< .u.~.u.'d .Win uW,uo ru Nr ~WN~«iw¢a Wu oN +pM¢ m>z 4JW6L y° mw± IZV2¢ J<JOJa p6 G V N¢N~666r F Z2 JP mr.l<Ow •L W SN1N .6 WYN Vmw~ pwiM F r N ~j•WUpF ~Oa {L l60 wwW 9Wr w r-wnr JwmOmwwjU<Sry GNUw WY¢wHtiU1P. O[ Y~UJ` ^W` mrt Y6H Ua0 rY•"H SC[6 <pM2<6Z 2 ^+aWONYwLLJLL ^u r, ~ ^~• •~~ p00L>wOVV <V! Kw 2IYOOpW060N6 W P ~<u.¢NwNNVFH ~~ u°m¢zz ¢oWZ¢r aruezo zNm ~ ¢w } o ~.+auua WzWi zNr-NF<J! NooJrJwp YUZia n ~. a° owpw 1- mN ••~ LLrJJJ zpzJ mV`pW2JLYL LJ}<ZNUPwVF<J « <Np aMt7 WI N=.[n<ZwNJrO}Oy~yJ^LOr J 2mJYNmmWN -Z I'ZW „ iiVOJ>2<O<N<m <UOpiN¢<1'<V wl-n t'WOVwnw¢ mVJ.~S60i><H6wC~¢J2Y\JFVJr-•.~<Nmf {YZYV•W+Z-•_O__ rl mJ600r6r=~Nw%WwwultN;WV u LNNNOKRnl61y0 ~lmaNNmN6rVU°r~°LLO~}VrO ~ain6Vm~C Om0m6?~xu%ir.LLa O 6 Z U NZ K aw U_ 4 6 Vr Z 2 V y6 r V 2 n Z t•~ ~6 iya ip pia s~ •aJ o 0 o uu U06p 6a V621 FO •l V6 Ow p > <JwJ NS Or ~• W < V ¢O }N wiN ri Iz W < UY 1-2 1V~W NR ZW=W~LTV w n12VYJ ~ Gw ¢Zw w2 VLN ~x a _+i4r^..Ir N;U rL ¢SL WYr }VLNW n¢ ~ 0 2 Vr- w LM6U o U n 7 Jp ow6wMZV ZZ W. <O•L Z ¢ J <O UJr arONr¢w~0<~W y rV2¢w¢YJpZ 2J < Jw0 LiV U<UwYw UJOV 22pLVHywO WaJ rN<r< V (WWN « 2¢00 Z aNwr 2 V<J JWWLLL <„ ¢I~'LLw JrI Iq 02ZJ¢S l.+r~JJOyN<N Lw«LLM W VV~ J 2}xJVO«JW <2J ¢Yry JYYLLQY SOZNS ZV2<w(VJtOJJ N!•66 LlWnU4'N ra6Y2 wFZ<OK 'J mUwi pmwJJarri 21222 ~ 2 <w'ZOO« «UZtw260t VVVVVx2r r~rn rr~lV Y'1<JJmVJJLLL2L~-4'~V LY 2Z;2 <1 •Pr"lnnln•+n+TmOPNnWaNNNFO~•INd.~wO+NPNPNNOr•Ym 41 amTamPON.p•.Pr mP 4•'IPm dFPPmOPFFOmNYOaNmNlNPOP /1 1~a•en FTayNPPNrnFanOnNrln Fryr am 'pP mOaONF.•IF ~ .y 1 ti w .. .. tir+ .nr .~ N .r r w ti .y n .4 rl W~unHYOOOrYWO~dOO~YJpdPO~TOPOOINPVdWrPdddN Jti yyypOPOgN OYdNWypPdNdJlPNPO/dyyJ>PNOPdPN 0oooo omm.D.`pii>N~oer9i «ra+isi>DCaaoomsivioim>Y> CCCCC Z90m nZZ22nKPP «N9N 22mCOSSTy 01'1m aZ(ymti I<NSZ >TNTm}Zr~n Om~p ti0 2~K SSSSS NTS> OVV>rySNA O)(~ ZO°mT 0020 TpmDNr-ITT NSa9~ 02N>)02y TN Z}2 as nnTT n0>Ta9°V °ly'1»> a atiNM K rlZr ^..1' 2Z2I2 2 22 O9FOm2NSn~ <NN~}mD nnnnnzni io~nn ~.°~ n°mnn n~iii rim~oYc'rz Nio ~~~~>nsm<Naoo Nmmmm <)~. } sr moyaFmNPY zm. °r myrmz zz wormm NIKHmH nr ~° ..w l.mr. PAN >~eo r mmi i° om.-~K n~TnN n- y°i mT~ OoOOO P 9nT OrV9"I pn Sa>I+p ~Om N n-la ~+ LL On KO~"~ 9D >O )S9Y Z9 S „Klwn „fizz KO nm NN^ rOOL v < n S -s mc. mzzg ~ rNZY .+ yPmN ii « am ayK~ a n:N m c )» sv n°ao n ° c'vzz N ~slc.~Tv rOiy wOi°M nN S 2 P = Z 9myM pAK O n Z ON OOOOO 2 O O c n K> „ zzzzz i n s nscz+ noooo i " S n ~c°O~ .... n y m yT c n a Pm JWdpmNyN. , pNT>Nay rnson 2-Ix stTn mmW+~~rmcTOOmpccmzazom9g>oom°pnm K..i <cr~°mam moam~°<oN aim °m 9m~~"i>a°nc~€vive9Ni rn.... din zcmmi> > ZmrrTTK~YN Trm~P 29N° Iii>nTZrmm9 nNNNTwO n9 O >OK)n.y iN99ZOO 90~D0 n r~Tm> Nn2NJp ~25~ N K>myJm >NCT yri r no9R O S yr~('IS O9"1 TOJn m•In 2No y 9000T~1 mPOn~ STT yyyam> ynNmr Tam2P ZTMm Ky O> » 2 ~TOONPTSl~9NOVNK I ATT m)N IX~+O y2~nN2M>OnT22T~unZ )[I92 Nmz pmm mm oNn rcN r. mYs a zP °oNi~ Pam` 9 0€ ia9~a mTR ~eezm :aNlomno 90s> tic s,im~i9..~r >.-mr wNreN KmNZ m> o D9a a9rm TyN ZOpZO aa O I 2 O~"1~ jNTY mz scTWPmT ~'aTNNTT ~1<.1 eem °'oy m` N)>t ~CrTT NUI zim~>zy ms ti aNn MT m °°ooa• O PmyG;TT O 2 i y O P 3HTy=iDm 2 Z _ =i C_m9 O Ji_O ~ _ 01 2• m Iy0 T y P NW~9M9 C Gly 2NGTP nnmm~ ~90SYnCN m mZmmPy>hn mr~ n nNyT OoOGO I,M 9W0 y. O O. 04 O ON„ O OmyO Tm TIS m°1'n a N Tn m md0 m IN I >H mm TnWmyy N a 01m d2 TNrm aaaFa ~W9i11T a99N ~W9 900 9 9=Ca T9 yyJJ'm no O •.yy N NNN mP~ O P NtiNV N I N N NN YZ NNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNN NNN NNNNNN NMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNN NNNNNN PNPPNJJI yy`` JJ yJSJ IfJJJllfml yllJJJ l+l wP POi wN~QdpJPVdil WNrOdOyPgfWNHOdPJP NJwNrOdNJ Wr W O ~~yy ~yOOPPOPNpgWO/PO1dT wPdY NNPJVIO ~~~P d~O MOON f JPd d.~O UpOJWNJydONO PfNONJ-1p NOPPPJr NJ100NU ~OOJPdJOVOY00pWONddOpNNOWdJp'~OWNONWd00001 lWdJPPgOOOPO000P1PO000PONOJOPOOdOOdPOOVOl 9 11 > N m m m P J C 1 n P a Z O > ID nraw(~p hOWnmp+ Po00n Oa-mVOnOm g4lppYrymWaOpOP POPYYYmpPYWOPNaPmn00^N rl-rvmm~n non:m..oom .. romo rm P aPa -.mN P-. Y ~.. c -. a u :i mPO..nmrwahmP O..n mrmarmP oo--..... ..... ......rvrvnrvnnNnrvrv ai w~nmam mwwma nnnrvrvnnrvNn.m.~ U Z~ NNnNNNrvrvNnrvryNNNNNnNnNrv V 2L /ii~ < Z O W¢wWw 2 2 J.himm .r PI- .hnG wiiN ~ m Z JuNm 6`Z6¢6 G Y Z.n 1- W 6 p{ R ~ ¢ hi •Y JO < phppO m O vJWUr W'-~W WWWVm6 ~ p Z 1 h Z u >Irl -~ C JW paGW m i < J¢ p<Np ODW ~niN<W 2 Jh YaNw m Y¢mL ~p m2 wmv~h u¢imti WmHWV ~ iVA LLu wi~izoa w..Ws V P~h Opw{OGOGpNUUY V • p2~n C OZOV u02 aVJN WIiQ >.hnZti{VYa62ZY}O mOW¢GJw ¢Z<V>u1..Z3¢mN ~OmY¢<2 LI r>wwm ti7- WrwKnm mG u2{O ;Vw Y wUV¢J~`ZF~V%J66YJ 74 OZN< m>L2<CVK<>Z~IVwVW<6W<.~ LPG.~OmYR¢mG~J ti<~nw%VmMmm YN •Z1 O<W E z~r pun u UV ¢ O<r up WW<v~ Z ¢V .. >o «w °um ~+i i~> zo `ua i o wY GJV. Vti<V .~ V O YH Z<~+ 2 WJ w1 < 2JI tiQ UUVVm:~ <WVY6 V.yW i ~¢6W<J ~JKWS •J¢ ZZ2 hh 02UNW2 YLLmFWSO ¢¢¢u'w ~n U< ~N U i >.-hWOO Z vzzJ i FFZ:solw-~.i u.Ji ~. r<~.w.~rzil:.~ 1 e°~.°~„°~N°~°n iU~~ilH~~z.h. :i iwwwi`¢ JU>UZZSNWL% Y 1 41 mPOPNW Nh aI11 H~+maP.yPn N.-pp0 mmm mr.Im mrlh mmP+aYN YmP'OW d`mmOaOY Pd0 Pmwd+OmP PN mmW r J + P W pPmrWWr mYS>NN»s> .. 2 m 1 I fY• GOOIy»O ZN>PA OStiKrf1 020 > ~ N r Im m NyKZrN N~(NTNyPATTmr JNT ZyZ n 9 ~ > OZr~my OZOerA« nM Om0 Z ~ Tai>CP r Zr>n~yfSmin=w Orly >AY n ~ n ~"~ OL OrmT~yrT CM nS >02 2 O m N N~COT22 n%}MTynY n> NY~ > C 3 -~ 2N S~Omm00>J»LOZYTUm m P T ZPNm >ZSm OCi r C21 wr Z G G > F TSNyy OO> nVmr} NA ~Or Z m ~n 2 1 MPP2C OXCXTp>~+CZ ZN -1 n zip ccmrnm a -~ozNCZr <s< z i c mm.. yaz }..m i TA 1Ntiy >r> ~ 1 .P.v -z. lnsiJ~vmmr.°-aN eN~N zNZ v .. r 11 s N m } ~o occ Ka~iN Smi s „n, 1 zy A nOTT N n <_n YU {~ y m N y n ~~ z T>A n ..T mm z N O £2 PC 2 m 1 >s nv N s N AA O < 2I A TT T v N r n T 1 n3mnOrLmNnZZNnNPAiyO mOfNT mmm ~ O C I _ yZ C>T>.1)NOAmmm < <OGr >T . C[r~A gtiH9~~yON~y Yr ymN^Caq<_T ~nJ O N Z O O Ir ~>TZrZAOy YrAm Prm(P O>Om K>K ,1 O 1 Im m O2> AO A IFS <pKN 'An Y PNTNY>yr ~ Z w O O IN 00 fm APyAR Iy An O A A P In pNmTm C « ON >N~-IygC TnOm ~n -~ f IA N IT Tr~ZOnV rr y Z / A m01 NLOnNI OZOTrm> 1 C 1 TP~OC 1 it' T j2DNNNC1Td y N• 1 pOSV A>K _ONOAW w + m 32 a r r'IZZnyvn ~ AyJ• O Nn TS Z22N 2m > m >O Z 32 n y P <O>TanAnA ZArLr i' n mnnmtin rn Mnn9yn 1n O {}. < Z• >O n n > yO~.T O OOOy L ZO Oia09C • 0 } ~ > ; >/Z>n TZmt T Z WNO ~~ m~ T 2 m~ 1 APT_> OA N_N_N A A T > Iy0 ~mw 21y ~yNmN2N N N{lY Z mA T mT m ~ m T+ WY+ i d T 2 32 2 y3 KSN -1 N N N NNN N N / n } C NNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNN IY j PVIPN VN++wwNNrrO i +J+~l~ NPWwWNWUwW NPPOO++add IA O dM1 JPNJwNrO.pP yP + N~OdPJPVWi J.wN:Od: W:r:VI^Nr ~> 2 • i Lf } 1[ 1> O YPN P IA > IA P _ _ 1 m Nrr.~uW~°. ~~rWriN~`IO WN V~I:~r c: aro .+il W m r i d+PPdNNWrNrmNrW+rPmoomer rdP o m iy r • ~+ooi.. Wo=.yooo .-~ ~ ~-o vvio~n ~oJ o a c o °oN OONmomroov ~n woooryooWOO oN o P o ~2 +<oa1°~ol°mmlm.~i~1::°noP-D.n~°o°OO°ommo d°m+m °o ¢r o°o°o ~.°~.N. ,Pr°o° oomonmo.oaa.:, ~i~rvo+.l-rv•~oo s..ir ,.~~,.~aml~o mor-n+~-o ~.o .. m m +PN dPm m Ud0•+ON r N n NN r rOnd INi~O N.. m0 2 O ¢ 3 V mi VI ddmdd d.Wpddd~nn Nnnnnmm mmam0m0PPPPpPPPPpO NNNNnNNNNNNNNNNNNN NnNN NnNNNNNNrvNnNNNNNrvrv .nVn r __ ___ __F _ w2 WUrur ~+ riv rrHV .{.N r4r Iy ly Z ¢¢ ¢ wa ~awwz ¢Y °D ~a ¢i xLZZZ z xz umzxW z .•i ri-W ri ao~W o oop x~o~ ra oaj 00 i4io J JVJ< ZW WWW w Win WU JVC pww Z 2Y< m nJ0 mS ZW ¢N¢V u m ZLL nC wZWrmN¢ ¢ w _ ~ iPOw¢ NaY •n Z 2 2 pON x•4 nOY¢60V¢__¢¢w _O _ti NJ 06! w,<OYOn >i plWZr< .N+oi Ns w<r-YiiiwNZdNDdD~~m anLN e~ <o Du ¢o¢ NzoJ J< ..z3waruwr wVrVNUm -D wr n2 VN 2<6¢LN Wt LL's O om L~Z¢wZwJwZmY •NY o~ "oD Dmo<io Ju si..z o<oowaNn i..pws j<n ~zm mrc wWa uu<Nw zN ..., war < >•'rou xa>zlui uu <yem .'".o 1¢p ..NU" mOYV ISr<x'J Y~'<YV<¢ppYLL ¢22 MI~mpD Ow pw uzm~ w< DD Ox~YwJ<mazz ~mi..¢oz¢ W~~ar-iim uo>..~ ~~.D.LL'~ou~n~~a°a~W.ilo.Dio~LLo Inp+wuaw<D< wD<.~ ¢..w¢ .~<N¢.m¢x¢mN~°.~.Pid<<: ui iN~rcrcrvnwr rc.mmp3u¢z~<uz¢n JY^ Zf2t < w 1<ys ~i : Wsw L LL t V Z JUN L ~ W~ DO O p O 0 w¢Z V V~-6 «VO V VV<S r L7 W wZV wV~n Z wZ V_T•• 2 _ ] '+ Vx~ w¢ ¢~ p~¢ Z N%- r ¢SSZ VYrw <Vh ZLL DwZ•yn <Um o{w <ro MZ o2¢Y FZO wril-Z<N~i msw ~ WN ~~'~ ro6Y % <W <> <I<.uwo°cYZ ~« ~pzN z~Nw~wz roawu"WZwr r_¢ ¢¢.iU2NZOZw2Z2YNU<1prN1.OU2p<<JJO V~w6wuwp N DD«D• NLONDpOZw ~ OWr «ZN J ZO i< ¢Fp>V¢K¢L« <¢wxN.~wVYOwOrZl~Oww20ZN6VYw• ~22W14 ~•<(~VUU6YWY ••U uZw/2wD¢>¢ZrYi ¢0 z > w ~" D z ~-pw .T ~+ U m ZLr J JOD W •t <OO¢ r~ODW 0140 UUUNVVUUUUUUUUVpDOmwO LxwWWwuUUVVVV~OVLNrr O rOPNNn+rvPNPNnpOrmmP drll"nYPNNmnddrNd I N NmmmmmOi nnnFmnNNO~NrN glPmrymPq+NTNdN.p (rl and n Jm md'9 mP nO nn •++ nOmOnmr 13 Nml w mmNd gWNw~lmfPOq ONN ~uq/PNmwmgPw O.DN df NwNNff NNr.PindO~ldNNwOrNON ggN.PPNyNW J. N.Pp UNr i 920»Y~LZ 2•(02ty N1A}mT>irrrw`•r>O SDTTA mOTTtinr ~2>[1Tn mZTNn~mmOnNZ TpN O.yA Am2ZG4r0> >9TT>OT> 9»m~n •• O GTP> Sp•+NNw•nT>Oq Ay9~2w Omnry •r30AmD3mw=r~Tt Am~N}ZNT20A2 n92rprTpNr020(TA 1qr%r>Zm21..5 L Y q >On2NN YTm m O T X>mTTTm<OZmO}nYZJnn 2DD>my>nnn 2n yny.. VO9 •~>ZgSAN Zrr OAT _SMOnmw00T Ar A•P•T2ONJOONOmST C•+ OnN•nv N-f F N}SNJ2NT0 TONCNm2 NCnmm ~ N N ND < DmCO >•'100 < nN22AOC M 3q~ ~ZrZYir AAG NOmNynA TA ~N 3n• r0 TM C~1n OaAYnDn Aq T9 NN OCS fm n >nn ~-.s DTnAw s .i,ni m2.m..z N > .ni anDN r ~T r no N >~ .~. zTNyn mn9 yr mn _mn ._q. D m z r C9O q /n ~Y f N nm p~ 9 O T-~ NO O • 2nN 9m }O nmD N N K P n 2 N n i nw n m i in n or N s mw3OVm99brnST03NAONm3AS>N>fTAmA'y2>GYOnTA2 NypN ymTT~S Tn„-Im mwN>T>nmP NrTNmT00<r•CONmW S~TNV > •+ .(' n CCI-TSP AT22NF r SD ~'mY nSVOy3m 9rm122n~tiNm222TA09>TMryi N p ~COAS myC>TF O mm~TOT00 p>A>2 PC Zm P •~mN nSAAK }~Im>m0 ~ Jm<>TnY Sm NPONmn >ON; Srn<m AO NDY~O TS T1PSn -N ~m H ArmS<mT~00nT±\ON T yCm~TnOT.-1 20 r OTNOPwN}T•TJ~N~N;Nw•1 Hn OT nm NI'lyO yZ Tpp 9m .b.~N O~>nmNxna~m»°s 7TiNO Wwv~zszi> ~DiDnNNz zzm arDD ><my a:nN ONN rTZNnJ nm m ' Po- 2timm~SPSmOO>~N9NN nT N m z` ~D morc i mm o.+NZ CC .. zm..mvv~C O J mPOw~r OT.T~• C1>rM \P~r !Zi[N ON2UT>~ ('1 '~A ~"~ >IpNNm1`w nN P-~ n.( 2 nm 9•+, n y ~.SSPmw> N• m -ASS rm P NAZT WSrnn>A JtiOYNnOy ~"<~-m_2r> m0 > >nA2 nAmYT nESjO inm CT 9n• •rnn Tn 1 Gm J Vr m> Z• ~ • pnbA~ ti• 1• NAmT C - S OOC>N Ai G CZUn 02 w =>m> Sy - m~n°r SY2n riwfp NI TC IJ-~S~O• ypY nNr•SO mN A d>Z AP PnS•9120 r9 nT t Am OTN)}YS w20 SO>N ^C ~n N O A1V • m mnyW m>~ Dc < N (1 Her m N NNP n Zr(1 NN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNN NNNNNN sPwWWPPWWPWPNNNPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPrP PPPPPPP ~"Odm4P~fWN^"OdmJPNlWNrpdm-~P N1W NrOdgJPN1WN~ N m N N Wmow a`P m°rWiWrrf.~~ W~NCNWmNdr.diau iov.~i.N~..~o.o orJ.~~NnoPO:DOOrNmdoPW NdNrv WVDNWa NOwyNPOO N.nO O~+Jf OW000VOOwmOOPOONwfNNOdOdON mOUPdPOJOdOONfOOmOOVOOWf000NO00w40001.O JOm { O T ~ P S T A 2 n n i n A E Z m nOOaOppONamN000mOONONaYmaa00000vm~00"000 Pry00POrOOVFN0000 nOPVmpNn OOmNOPn parv v SI POnvN YPONNOVmmYmWNPnNrY~nONVOPN O.pnYOPO <~ nOnr rrvPmmN Y mPmY NOnr rvryOm nOrN rm v0^~mr Ymnn Omm v mnr 21 P O rv rvr T 6 < 1 n N N -r Z it miter mYNarvm~OrNMYmaYmPOr NmYNa1-mPOrN .° ~i as oaa o:oc:pmo.ao .aooaaaa $a.°o °m Fam aoauaouoaamm NNNNh nNNry NNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN 3~ NNNNrvrvN NNNnNNNrvNNNNNNNrvNrvNNhNNNNNNNNNNNN i ZL YiC LuOi miCZS Om mC q Maw .2. is z V 1-<Y 3 •~tir+ WW~NSr 1rP rl u.ln O.+ S ¢6 mmm¢2W¢m < 6 .ww W¢¢¢6~ N•Y+ 6Y4[ _ 2_ awwYwq N ¢_N _w¢www__w VV 2 S mO.nyrhtrLL W ~- .-I OLF • aVr V 00 oa Cgoj al zwo °i 2 oWW 2JUWWyWM 6WUUUWWWWV ¢V = Z F ~f .V+L 6¢¢ H¢YrrP jN 1- W 6 J 2H m 1 ~ wO1NFNrm36N m N wOV mlOt~p U -.O z ~OVW m 2~ ONa Ut • 011m > OY mOm V~< N¢`~Y6u~ N2¢ n22~3m ti2~n2W„w Zwk KNawN¢ Oi O wOV m0~0 Wy~+W{O>Fr 2V ZO<O 2 32r1 ¢Z <_Cw ~OOwF 2VMLLL~-Z <6FbZYwZ2 3wZJw2Ni YONYU OFVr+ KP Y~-ISwJ~w V~L Yww NZ<w2w WZNWu wfr<rwzVUO ~-Z ~1 YMq~Ni N¢C~-uwiw30ri0m¢w¢J WSNF¢N6rn¢ wY<N«>V¢ Y00 w'n wVrLLw¢YOOOZ w¢il NSJ~~JUOmU «'JrW •VOO iI- O Z V.~1S26 jYlOw JLL jma• S Cm 2tiJ2 < 7N r.)V¢ 'n¢LLOJ Z r¢ V L¢wrl-Ymn¢F.Z Yr Jn216 ~iumiz ¢..w wza owznJ raywpuicw wY=m`oWw~w¢wwVw6VVw>~nO OYMa >OW¢2rJww<Nw00 I mr ii¢ >~-¢Z<LLr¢Z¢OSiamPnOU¢ Jr00¢ P O FO Cu tg~VU p u_ _ 2 V O NMOO < w w •- ~ gwWw 6' OH „ ~n t v F ¢ V 6U LU ~U 6 U Offfi Q V Z J ~~- wriiU li-I~¢2 O wL ^ +O'.MUJ=iw wWma OJY 400VOw •, tiu _ •Zn r<n ¢ UNF' ¢Ww rltiHplw rV•I u 3 w~ O~-rOwO Uj7< n wLL W22 Ir f ozi s ~a z wWNZ._IJJrz j io¢ W.. m Nip<.¢JmJU s<wooN sN«« zQ .. t w o..u<wf ~m¢o uuFYarw uuuu.~.N uYWU N o °¢~N~rrr~¢iwnuoJ oww¢Y Wq « pjz~ ~~.. •iWV{~+rW qN Y2¢ZSwO q<SZZL¢¢n6j {< YwJJ O gWZ¢2<mMLW 6<w~y2 NmW¢W¢q¢ W q ¢wq .~uNq FwwmNWCw o¢ogoorc> zsi ~N-I ~N-I¢cso q ¢ Jw m NN Yzzixi ¢rwwW ice.. J U~+• OVNwN W 2 SSYU-Y rti 2r~F <rKY• ¢Wl2LLjNZiu->NUVUZii6<OrOgg791~wF IYK %=6LL m <•W<nNMO t<fONw 2.i00mOO70N y21.•ILLi <I"I ~[ m W¢¢~¢f¢NJ¢¢¢NNNNNmNmNYNNNNNNmw Z~jVgrL>SNLe O armOmOmaNNamOPNVPmNaPMNnFFFrmN<PP Oarhm nY• 611 PNmFmgmMm nl-M NYmnmr PmmaOrr.nr mNN .ym h Harp m 1 rv0 NONy~nNmMNPN Ja YM1~mmmmNNm~f PYmMy.ONP~ /~ S l T Y P V T n ~ n m i r x e '" K O m O P i 9 >_ n a s x 0 _O C1 ix P IA m IA W ~• IL 1> v IA ~ 1 A i1 P O If IT U P P P ~ I 5 v Fs~ ~~ ~Qx _ ? ~~ 3~a' ~ `x ~ as ssm5s$&s i s ~ gg a: .. '.~ M~ C Ys Vii: ~ _ _ i fi sg -m _ oa~sa~= sli % a =(_.o _^ " - R~~: i ~ dim ~ .3 y~ Ede F ~ __ . 58~ _s~:. °~~° S ~ € R ! 833 ~ ~ I X S~ e~ : ~ y ~ ~~~.. oi ' ` _nx ~~ '~!' / i~' :~~~ 5 Y` ~ ~ Xf Y~ S° ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ 3 \I \~ P $ L g Y~ ~ ~ ~ f I~ S fi Y 8%88$$8 88888 88888%8%%88 $88 8fi888R8888HHa88E8R 2 e.._vts~e~axa~x5~yz~t5_"s:~m~c~:=~~~~3~~risama~= ~'~ 3 s °" ~~~~~:ic~~4E~-ss9~~~'~#sq~@~~~~='~F€~11~f#Y-[EiF~f~~~ !~ °°~~«Y19SE;8;SSSCB~.-~.E~9Yv~~rYYBw«E8EEBEwREEEE ____.,_e=ti_wvv-3.a._...=-a=y%`._Yx83:?93:y~&. c",ABZ ''Y~ _ 3EC~9~lT~ltCCla°i!3°:C KBY-m.m ~~39~emi8~~3 °.: CCCC6 v 8883888888388383388:8888888888383=«88883883 ~.. ~~~88~88~~88~888~&8~~~8~~~88~88~$:g~$=~~~8#8~ _ ~' 8888888888aii8E888898888888888888s L88_8888888 ~p~ 883388888888838338828888888888883«=vE88888883 ~~ Yab 's'ssas's'ai'a eases a'aa'a'aa'ssi's assasas~as s'a'e-'x'a's a s'sa '~ - ~s= ~ aaa~~sd~~~~~~~lii~4s~~aa3s#~ti~~~iEks&ssx~nisH~#x 'e i s~&$s&3~$%~~~~~~~~"ax~~6a~s1f~~E~~~~isxeir~s~~~~~& !gym - ~ !$s a5&$~E~6$3 dae£~Sa~!xclo~?FyusB~£si5nisx~~~~e~~s' ss s'a s3ssas8sas33asaas2ss-ass#s8s'ssa33~=«'s ~s'a-a3-s-ss ~~~ °,°x~~~&~~B~~~IIIIHII$~$$_sa$E$~~$fi~~~$<55$x~~~&g~~ iF sasaasiasasiasssassails'abaisasxaissai:assissa ;a F.E°9.S:ESS;SS^E34aE3rAERa; °~rSY_RaYYYSSYwYEB.°`.~ a d'c=_u'gcsz=_°e_x=a=-=-=-_~~scs_,zsp=~i'=s:s`s=~z. ~s2 eR e~~5m?~"ss..ce$sr53rvd~aesaa $'?3nea'e.ee-s c~~::v=~ !° .. ~~ %e _..~=r=a~...s _~=~ _ =S_»..-~,".; ~X~B=a n.°nFMnFr_8= ~ ~ _ aszaaz€saazaszs asssascas czeaRZZaazaraasa z$I, s ~~ aaea^~scz_e~~a eses;ssss=e°esa eaaeB3d3„~eaaasz3a3es„a2adz s`e-oaBe?'s?eesseee?:e_o=sea YI 3s333%8888883%8 a EaaR883sE8E883888R8saRa8€$ ' 33aSg~S~e88~%$8 _ e888~g~~~8~8~e~~~~SRuF~Efra '" 8S~e8eL8889LReS - 8KF:SG&§BY.S&%SBSeSSSe8b~$ g . pe' =_m°c~~3es§'ss50r $.=?3~¢~~;:~=0aec`a°"=>E~s"s em 3aR8FR~8888r88R o ~~~F,~R~~~4R A,~~$Si4$KFK~~$~8R8 V __ ¢ -sr~d^R888fi~rRR~ . .mP:~~m.. ._~~.~~~ ~8~8~h8^~RA8,~8RR~CSp,R~RR$AR8 ~.m..m . 8 ~ SN. _ 3E38838388R888R _ . . ..m.: ...m~m~.mm.,.. ~.. 88888888888888888888888888 -s 9~fi88~e88888~~~ 8~~8~8~~~~~~~~8~~~~8~SS~88 y~ry ~~, _ =%~=saas3casa co - _ - azzcss>sasessssosas 3:s saws ~_. s x~~ _ 8x_8588888888888 _ 88888888888838888888588888 - ~ " ~Sd~~~~Ra~~~~~~~ 8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~8~ ~ _ss_s_assaessas - szs:ras$8zse saassass€_ssss Y=~'~, Sm F,BYaSiFmBmaii maBaC:~b:ma9aiE:8m6a6s3m2m ~3 ~ '--~ -- -_ ^aea°?e?z~~aesRS~=oa ~?°'rv ` _ ., ~ ~ ~ r.. e.ve_e.ve-e-.e. ~e:esae-s?aa saeaa==s=- - va M1 ~ i ~ s ~~~ ~ iig1g ^^ ^ ~ ~~ay ~y~$~ q N~~ Y ~ ~ W~~ i~ ~~.~ ~yY ~y=~~~ ~.3YY~. b ~ V°~ . 8S a 3~ y T,~.Wy N~ 3n ..aJ11~~ t " " y „~~ veg a ~x c q 1CW heaSS_ _ '~ Y_5 ~'~~SU~=~ al~a~es s~ w - e x ~e~a~sar_aya.a.aW a=...~=~ ~„_ xaa3+""~s~6'a ~a'ten~s~a~:~~ ~ 3ea~? W - ~ :.ara . a a ~e a W^ _ aey ~ ~Y _ _Y ~ W_ ~ T. ~ _ ~ =^q~ngg$$ gga~~:a= ~`: 88~8$8~F888838 -m~-~aC:.^~°.:a8 g-g..x_88.°.aa3 ~'ii ~3838888833888~~~88~~88~888 ~A S S k Ysasaissa~as~a$s$s~$SSSYBSSSSBis~iY~$s~g$SiysYS~-$ $ u c s _ s "s~~sFg"-"g~~5~~~1F>a~~~~§¥~FaSa~~~~~~~igi~~~~~~4~~~ ~p~~F~~€3~~T~$~E"i~9as"i&~ $$~~"as"m~~~;~"u_":".~a~~ EYEEE$SE~8.-.°SEeP=Sw-iBEYiYvE««EQ~_~SEEE«EYEE c3~23C~:'vES_tlJ_&~a'Yv~=~3YY%`J,9YYYS=S~6: EYY_~YX E°9te~°C°SLi°iL~~~~L°~O?L~6IIfEitlCt~i~titY°~~ aaaaasasssaasasa'sassaa$sassas§ssssaa'iaCia$§a Y 888888888888888888888888888888888886885x8888 ssaeesas asasssaaasasssssssass'a a's asasas~'$s$§s . 'ss'ssYis86si86 s'is'sa6'i'i 's'i's a6 i'is6asaas6a8se'i s8Y sssxsax~~v~a5a ~ffa&ba.s~~a&Qt~ta§~s~$~~~&s#'s ~s~8 _ s~ssaux~~v~~Ss~iFs~~al£~tass€~3f~a5~sII1'a'~t~E~su~~ ~ ~~~ssu3e35~e2~Fs=~?EUU~as~£es~c3$=~~39~~siss °c seas'sea'assas'8saa'8sasassssa_'is'a'iss'i'isssa$'ls§~s . ''a'sas'a6i6'i66siiasas6'sas'i's 66asaaaa'i sa 6'a's:ea's 8s EYEE««SSSSG_ErYY~SG;EEaY3YGCrr«e«5~3«08L°Y8S vYR~i'Yv_==Y:tlL=C912~i~~~~~YE«~:SZ~~_O;.SSCgG: .._~~..-. ~...~~~~~~arasa•ataatlialiiE!liiiii9 .. Yo8eYC-YyC$F~K..Eu3=u-~'.~5."i $: .--.5$LL$Yv:v$tiL=BPV~ ~~ YR mi ~ s a ~ ~xa ~ $°~ L~ ~` '. $m " ~s o^i ~Y= ;$ & o _ _ _ ..., . .. m ~` S_iiiiii5 8:8&^> BLiiiiis ;;_ _ g&~ a--RR~° -~R° e=88:~fi- _^^_se "s ~~s'a 'a8aaa8 es `as a8'a aBsB's ?'s os` e s ~'~~ 8 28RA82 8888 8 %L=g8p8: !R_. % ~ °a?gss~i E' - sci~ ~ $?ra?~~~ n ~s,`r "s e _ Nm ~~ 8 8R888888 8 8888 8 88888888 8 -_ c 8 8 s=- yi s °s ~~~~~°a°s ~ ~~°a~ ~ ~~~~~°s°as °a -'s?"s °a °s Sat 8 R3S8aA8a %888 8 85=~'8~8: Kr.`.= - R S ~-~'~~, siioisai mmm~ iscsaiii mm a o 2 e..veoove evoe x888.88^= eves e e ~ ~~ ~lii3._~~ ~ '^XkM% °y -kyYtk k!!X Y ii.'Y~ ~ ~Y !Y ~ ~ y ~ y W Y ~ W 1 ~ Y ~ ~ ~.~ yg a=~~a"z~~¢ ~ ~"x=~ ~ ~agscF¢asg 3 ~.~_., ~ ~ ~~ m ~s"ssasasa e~~sa _"sasses"a 'a ~~~~"s ~~ cs si! x a^ a s Y 5 s H a E ~ g~ S : ~ ~~ i T` ~ ~ E ~ Iii ~ ~ ~g Y~ W x i _ ' ~^ - _ e G ~~R ..RR ]S °eb g $~ ~ F gQ „ ;4s S .Y' _ 3 tai '.k iaL :~ ~~ :F i ~ :p'i °; li^ ~.a ~ a _ ~ - - '" ~ ~s 8a=xa a a a s a a a x ~: as sa s a a~! ;: ssxg s c ~ _ s s _ ~x sa es s _ aa! ~ ~ as-~ sa a s asa 8 8 8 s a ~ ab"'~ 8 $nSn eg ~ e ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 - gg a s»c" sa s a £3a s a s o s_ c~ .. _ s-- @yv m aaaeseaaameosssaaaas~~a mesasaaama ~_., a: ~' ---_o~o_" eda.sa'r°_=_~s_s==~d °s_~ss`a>s'aq pa $' ?'~' eveo~°eeeee~eas~aaava?aoevee o~eeeesee g~E __~ .~R~axgSR~3?~$A~R~~~x'~8##xR~~~~ ^?rR~~a"~~E~ ~~ ~ asc as ~ ~3 t~"•,,..~==...,.: ..W Was==~YSSe~~~ cc ~~~- aaa ~, a633S~X S69-3~~aea~~i ~.. ..~»a~ i~w~f n?=:~== s8 _r.xk~sgeaafia yY== aiCC__ taa ~'~~ ~; £aai4'##'#l4ll~z~~3C5~9~~wWV~sr ~ ~5~5~~`vrg~3 ~ a ~ a ? a „x°za~°^~es~ze~=>=§3§?Ek=sass= ; ~mP g."e5ssx^= ~ ~I :$88E888888~88E8S88888a8~8F88 Y JFffi8_.E8s8E8E R ~ - i i a3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R s a is ' ' g$§; ~ s~~ E~ r s sses~c s~ $~ ~ sgsssa ' a ° _ _ ~ ~ ~ 'M1 ~ iil ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ a $ ~ x ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Fl ~ ~~cg .~ ~ ~ S£Fi~ ~ ~~ ~ sfi~Q~~ ~ ~~m $ a ~.~ C~FF ~~ ~R ~ g ~ ~'~3 _ '~ _ ~ fR3C 3C ~, ~ 4'°~, y 3C ~ L rfWW~ 4 N ~ 2_ ~ ~~S e^-' '~' ~ e58e K ~' ~~L8h~ '~~ a ~~ i ~ ee e° e_ e o e veve C°~Y ovee„ e.H v~9x - '~E~ ~ ~S ~,.~ SC R Z Ca3 9Sfii8 m R Y 2 g y S , ~ a 3 ~ y va S Y Y S 8 ~ ~ ~ j t Y ~ ~ T .~". 3 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ,. S X' ~ 8 ... 8 8 S R ,7t 1R 1R '..A. IR M ~ 9 .. ~ ~ ~~ ~ aq ~ ~ ~-~, xw ~ ~ s'as s i7'~i ~~~ ~ $~ ~ F F~ ~ ~ ~ E ~t € a $~~ $ jgi RR Gai F 9 8~ ~ »~ 9 5 ~ 8~ i A S 888 8 N _ _ _ e 8 8 _ I ~ ~ ' a 5 n5 es a _ $$ :R s a ., ss sc o r as e's e : m a~- ~ s =x' ~- Y ., Y6: g5 ° ~~ ~5: ~~ g S-m o . 3Y" gX ~e, ~iS a' - - ~ x _ N m ~F: og xn $$ -- =_ '~ Y ~: ~ ~ Y Y ' 3, y Y ij 8 ~ ~ e y ~ ~~~ .. E ~ e ~ g~ 3 5 T 8 = ~ y ~ a v W a 7~ COPY _ -, :,~_ a y .~ d L Q 0 C IdQ .` i w<M«\-M~n M'<W/ ~ I~YMWMY <W 11 r wr IN.4~nw. oFM~ aNy MIK~TgN /W MCONOYC iiYYME 1ECWWi1 1.'tY 9) DI IICEN]FI9t ~ .~""„ ENO. Tb DFP/Inui d AkaEelk iFlalaDF Cmhd ~CEIFI ND, Iw Sen Balurdiro .tiP :iA[E CP:~Y1L ]990]A Soewb.CdI.FAIi ~ ~.......e.~....<.ao.~ Af,j 3615 T6.InImNmd M/N).APRr fs ~ ;..,.~,~;.:;,,~.1~5 g,s; , Eaaal sNn1A.I r fdL.e , xNma :. f/AME(S) a AIFIKANf(EI A ""' """" AgiFI FadF/ SEC LADY ~ IiL, di~6 ' f (oab< lleAw Dan Is31um>• t11wNw OaN: ]. TYFEISI a ]tANSACnoE11s) Ea 1K. TFFF i E+er.TSP. ll,]. of 11 R II 1. Flellb d S, Fo<aEOn d Mtin«a-IVUmhw wd Snw dlbl N. Pmfnlll 91W. Oily oM rp Ced. Camry s ~i3rrno Cur ~ ilT3u San 3~enazal,n yDTAI u,A,Jo 6. II Fr.mix< lkFthN, ). AN Ar<mi«a In<dF Slw. fYM d lkanb 11-1TUV09 CiN limiht !^_ E. Awibp AIAFaa lil IiMNm lwn S)-NUnLn aM Snaa rr.yi ~Mrl n~~ 9 ; Ne.a yea arw Gam mnrkM d e IdmY1 `IO.~Nera Y^a <vFr riobbd an) d Iha proAeam d IM Akobak . E<wreEE Conhd An er nEYIaEaM of Ma DFParbbm pr- 11. F<Pltin o "rE3" en<MM b ihma Y o/ 10 en en o11oMmMl Nu<b MWI a tl<Fm<J Po/1 M MIa aPP1itOXN. /'/ .J 13, ApPlkom nE/an lo) tM oef nbnaEF/ mnplgN iI ennolF Ik<n«d P/+^" ..AI Fa.a ell Ma gwbRraiana el o IkFinaF, aM lb) rsa. M .rill nw rielel< w mVM or pnmh b be riolaM any d IM p/evi<ion< PI Ma AI<e6eFt EFrnroEF CoMrel An. I]. ]lA)f Of CAIIfCIMIA Ceonry d _.___$M_bfAEStllno___.__.___.Dab___}p](yp..._.._____.... .... .~..< .r+.w.. ,. ~ M+.n.. :.r.M..~ ~. r.n . - ... ~.nf.. M.d M .L ..Nw.w.~, a~,Mr, ~.,~n/ ~rMr+/y~~~, .n,M • mfr d ,m,lnv. i<i M M vJ .... ~r M ~iNx~ +r •.M M w.~~ .. ..r ~r xr ..e .. n.. Y .Nl.ir s w x r/M,d 11 ANIICANI //~ ~~ / _ •NEIC11rION 11 T~ANfiE~O! _ _ 15. StAif G CAUPOENIA Cwnry d..._.$A4_94FMLSF44E! .............. wN___~~~(d@..__.. _..._...._ ur r.w.../ n .Mn w M ~~yn< rvwJw Mrm ~X+eN n n bMi~y u awM/ w.r.4. rl Yv.AN MM M a/Ivw ~ in.~n,. M ,m.Jx r <n am fi Mx ~M r. i/nu/ r Mh n n .a~+ wr.< rv.wr M'/t • M <n ny M ~Dmv~wn~ ..'/~wa x r d ,mN/.a w r ~ M.~ .1 mnr~, /i M, M ~nn.~w m/iv.~.m r/ M •.Mn~n </~ M M ~x.n ~ M w/.w ~.f m ,.rwe IuwF n w nrrw~i ^ EFnE.M Ir d.______...JMIa .............................OEIa an..._..._.__....__Jbtapl NE.._...._.....__........ _.,,n_ a~ _..,. Ero Na w<w EeblP rAk 1,hN; ra DFpdNInEPI v« ftary AMxhFd: ~] EwaIM naka. o fdudar P4NF. ~ .."-'-----...-"-..---~-'---°-"---°...-....-cones aAnED -'-`-rA7aa'---'_......_...'-------.' ~• ~., I ~/ ~ , FOOTH?LL LIQUOR Located; 0161 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Ppoperty currently Zoned; Commerical APN 0207-113-02 Zoning of adjacent properties; Nn rr'n,• fnimm~r•i,ra? South: Commerical East Commerical West Commerical IS- ~9AR 88 u~.. ~ u V Y--~- ^~ i - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer t Subject: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 4 to Associated Engineers in the amount of f6,000.00 for Design of Concrete Reservoir south of Hillside Road west of Archibald Avenue to be paid from Systews Development, Account No. 22-4637- 8748, bringing the contract total to ;28,054.53. RECDMEIDATION• Approval of Contract Change Order No. 4 to Associated Engineers in the amount of 56,000.00 for Oesign of Concrete Reservoir south of Hillside Road west of Arch bald Avenue to be paid from Systems Development Fees, bringing the contract total to 528,054.53. BAC106ROIID/ANALYSIS The City Attorney has recently received an indication from the property owner on the south side of Hillside Road that he desires the City t0 replace the existing concrete (tn-ground) reservoir with a similar installation. The option was an above ground steel tank. Since this cnoice has oeen mace in ice negonation process, mere nos resulted the need for an Engineering Design of the appropriate structure which was not anticipated previously. The current Design Engineer for the City has agreed to provide this design for the above price. Resoectfu ly submitted, RHM: :pam Attachment as ctTr aF xANaa aN;Amwcn ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER r er o.: Design of Concrete Reservoir South of Hillside Road Mest of Archibald Avenue 3-17-88 a T0: Associated Engineers, 3216 East "E" Street, P.O. Box 9419, Ontario, CA 91761 ng neer You are hereby requested to comply wit~n the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. in Contract Price In Contract Price Design of Concrete Reservoir South of Hillside road Nest of Archibald Avenue 56,000.00 TOTAL 56,000.00 Negotiations with attorney's of owner and City concluded that a concrete reservoir would be needed rather than a steel tank to replace existing concrete reservoir. ine amount ui the Cuniraci wiii ue (De~.reaaeui ii„~,vax.i) u} i:ic suw vf: ,ix Thca;acd Dollars and no/100 -~oT18rs (f6,000.00 )- The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Twenty Eight Thousand Fifty Four Dollars and 53/100 Dollars (528,053:3'-T- The Contract period provided for canpletton will be (increased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) 10 Days This document will bet -a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Requested: ' ~ _. Cc° = °~ ~-_• _~/Z,~~'. uss agu re, y ng ne r ? i)-a-Ee Accepted: i ' 3- Z ~~ Y~ ng neer_ Issaurrs~JS"uriN+lRS a e Approved: ayor, y o ant o ucamonga a e s n ono on us as recor o any c nges or na en neer ng agresent dated: CO 86-42 April 17, 1986 a~ - C[TY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 6, 1988 io: City Council and City Manager Fran: Russell H. Maguire, Cfty Engineer By: Henry Murakosht, Associate Civil Engineer SuO,~ect: Approval to execute Contract Change Drder No. 2 (C.O. 87- 20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Greek and Associates to continue design aAainistratfon reports for the Banyan Street Extension and Channel Crossing of Alta Loma Creek to be funded from the Systems Development fund, Account No. 22-4b37-8734. It is reconwiended to expand their contract by 35,000.00 to bring their contract total to f13,799.50. RECONENDATIOtl: It is hereby recaweended to execute Contract Change Order No. 2 with Don Greek and Associates for continuing design administration on Banyan Street Extension and Channeld Crossing of Atta Loma Creek. BACKfR01A1DJiWN.YSIS: The firm of Don Greek and Associates was engaged to perform predesian studies for four pro,~ects, including 19th Street - all fnn^ p;;ases, Atta lama Assessment District, Banyan Stroat 9r;uge Extension, I-15/Route b0. It fs now found n?cc+aary to expand thelr contract to cover the additinn~t :ai,•krngs encountered. The Change Order 1s for the amount of 35,000.00 to bring the Banyan Street Bridge Extension contract to t13,799.50 to fw! paid from the various pro,~ect funds. Respectfutl ubmitted, 1~~"~ RHM:H am .~ ~ Attachment J~ clTr aF nANaio axA~owGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER r er o.: Banyan Street Extension 8 Channel Crossing of Alta Loma Creek 3-16-88 TO:DOn Greek b Associates, 2428 N. Grand Ave., Ste. L, Santa Ana CA 92701 ng near You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. in Contract Price In Contract Price To continue design adminstration for Banyan Street Extension which is now at the final stage of Environmental Assessment RepoK 55,000.00 Tf/fA1 25,000.00 These workings are on an hourly basis to assist in the design adminstration and it Ts estimated that the above amounts are needed to complete these workings. The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) by the sua of: Five Thousand COllarS duu nufiw Dollars (15,000.00 'T" The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be: Thirteen Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Nine and 50/100 Dollars (513,7 The Contract period provided for completion will be (Increased)(Decreased) (Unchanged) work on hourly basis This document will become a upp)ement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto. ~ l 1 Requested: lrl~ti- ' i~ uss++e u y ng ear a e Accepted: (r' JC ~ ~-w~w~~td __ za ~ineer ~ ~~-" a e Approved: ayor, y o anc o ucananga a e s n orwm on us as recor o any c nges or na en near ng agreuent dated: March 4, 1987 C.O. 87-2D ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakosht, Associate Civ11 Engineer +;,;i n.Y Sub3ect: Award and Execution of Professional Services Agreeaent with GPS Consulting Civil Engineers to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Improvement of Reach 18, Natershed Y (Alta Lava Stores Grain) for a fee of 523,315.00, to be paid frog AD 84-2 Funds, Account No. 80- 4637-6028. RECOMMENDATION: Execution of Professional Services Agreement with GPS Consulting Civil Engineers for preparation of Survey Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the improvement of Reach 18, Netershed V (Alta Lama Stores Drain), for a fee of 523,315.00 to be paid from AD 84-2 Funds, Account No. 80-4637- 6028. BALKGRWMD/AMIILYSIS On March 14, 1988, a panel of professional engineers, including John Y..a1.. 04L-u u t• nA On .u• Yu •~nn1.1 •~ n1.M rf.dl En non nd n~J • ~..J Jerry ~Lindqufst,V P.E. of~ Don Greek and -Associates, met to -review proposals submitted by four (4) design fines responding t0 the City's Request for Proposals for the subject project. Prior to this greeting, each of the panelists had received the Scope of Service and Credentials for the four (4) different design fines, for a careful review. Mr. Lindquist, acting as Project Coordinator for the City, was charged to prepare a detailed evaluation of the proposals pertaining to the meeting of the requirements stated in the Request for Proposal letter. Mr. Llndqulst's Statement of Qualifications is attached for Council review and consideration. The review panel confirmed Mr. Lindquist's report. The ranking of the firms by using the various criteria listed 6y Mr. Lindqulst's report was as follows: 3~ CCSR Re: GPS Agreement April 6, 1988 Page 2 Ranking by Strength of Proposal GPS Consulting Civ11 Engineers John Carollo Linville and Associates Associated Engineers Associated Fee's 523,315.00 (+=700/ea if R/M legal plots needed) 526,021.00 - 533,676.00 (+f300/ea tf R/W legal plots needed 515,930.00 539,732.00 The fires of GPS Consulting C1vi1 Engineers is recaewended as the design fine far Lhe pro,~ect both on the strength of the proposal and upon the fee proposed. Respectf 1 submitted, C ~""-~ RHM: :pa cc: Jerry Fulvrood n c5uui ~r Cen'ser Cuurdinacor Attachment ~~ Q ion Grc-.al< and f~ssooiot~s CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS Marc!: ,+, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA 9320 Baseline Drive P.0. Box 80'] Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 AT1'N: Henry Murakoshi SUBJ: Evaluation of Proposal Yor Improvement of Alta Loma Storm Drain (1819) Dear Henry: We have reviewed th e proposals received for the subject project. Proposals were received from GPS Consulting Engineers, John Carollo Engineers, Linville Civil Engineers and Associated Engineers, Our evaluation of the proposals is as Follows: SUMMARY EVALUATION Criteria CPS Carollo Linville Associates Project Team Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Experience Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Subcontractors Don Berrie Cold Coast Richard Mills Richard Mills & Assoc. Surveying Associates Associates (Design (Soils Eng.) (Soils Eng.) Survey) CHJ, Inc. LeRoy Crandall (Soils & Associates Eng.) ($Oil9 Eng.) Webb & Assoc. (Environmenta l) Method of Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Accomplishment (Note 4) (Note 2) (Note 3) Schedule 11 1/2 week s 13 weeks 8 weeks -24~weeks 19 ~1 pa]a N. GRAND AVE.. • Sw1TE L • SRN TA ANTI. CA Ytp01 ~ ptq Sp~099a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March il, 1988 Page Two Insurance Professional Liability 8250,000 55 000,000 $250,000 850,000 General Liability 81,000,000 8500,000 81,000,000 81,000,000 (Note 5) Resource See Fee Not Not Not Requirements Proposal Provided Provided Provided Fees See Fee See Fee See Fee See Fee Proposal Proposal Proposal Proposal (Note 1) NOTES Note 1 Right of way maps end legal description are not included in the Fee proposal. Cost will be an additional 8700 per parcel. Note 2 The method of accomplishment does not appear to be written especially for this job. If the writer had made reference to the consultant responsibilities listed in the RFP, for each subject heading, it would be more compleCe. (For example: JCE will review existing soil boring logs to determine if additional work is required, then work with the City in locatin¢ and arheAull..P pr.±±.±c-,1 ~•-- ,~,,ryenry. aowever, the HE'P requires the consultant to provide a complete soils^evalumtion end report.) It is also noted that the transmittal letter at the front of the proposal was written for a transportation engineering ProjecC. Note Although the Project Design Scheme section of the proposal is terse, it is adequately supported by inclusion of a copy of the RFP in the proposal. Noce 4 The Project Design Scheme set forth by GPS is very complete and indicates that Che project has been carefully analyzed end thought-out. N°te 5 Does Associated have 850,000 or $500,000 of professional liability insurance? The proposal contains a typographical error in that Che amount is Stated e9 "8500,00,00." 3~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 11, 1988 Page Three SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Since none of the proposal can be re,~ected for good reason, the consultant should be selected on basis of Fee proposal. IF the fee proposals are equal or of no consequence, the following is observed: a. Carollo is the only consultant with at least $1,000,000 of professional liability insurance. b. Carollo offers the strcngest design team end has a reputation for completing many large and complex pipeline pro,jecte, including complex waste water treatment plants, etc. c. GPS provides s well-balanced comprehensive proposal which indicates the proposed project has been carefully considered. d. Linville's end Asaocieted's proposals are considered equal end leas impressive than Carollo end GPS. Very truly yours, DON GREEK AND ASSOCIATES GJ Gerald J. LindquSst U Partner CJL/sb 3h --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: April 6, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, Gity Engineer 9y: Gideon V. Agra, Jr. Civil Engineer Subject: Award and Ezecutton of Professional Services Agreement with Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. to prepare plans, specifications and estimate for Ninth Street Pavement Rehabilitation between Baker Avenue and Vineyard Rvenue, to be funded by Systems Development Account No. 22- 4637-6747. RECOMiEM011TION: It is recommended to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors to prepare plans, specifications and estimate far Ninth Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Nldening pralect. Such work to be done for a fee not to exceed 516,880.00 plus 108 contingency shall be paid from Systems Development Fund. BACKtl10UMD/ANALYSIS• On March 4, 1988 four firms responding to a Request for Proposals for the Ninth Street Project, submitted detailed scope of work. barkarni,nA . _ ..~, „y.. Lemn credentials co the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Three of the fines met the professional and scope of service requirements established by staff. A ranking of the fee proposals are as follows: Linville Ctvi1 Engineers f16,680.00 L.A. Natnscott A Associates f36,700./00 Associated Engineers f37,000.00 Staff recommends Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. for award of the project. the not to exceed fee will be paid from the Systems Development Fund and is included in the Capital Improvement Program List for 1986-87 with budget allocation therefor. Respel~r,submi tted, ~' RHM:GYA~ Attachment 37 RESOLUTION N0. 8S ~ ~~P / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNW TO AWARD AND EKECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LINVILLE CIYIL ENGINEERS/LAND SURVEYORS, INC. OF RANCHO CUCAMANGA, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE FOR NINTH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND WIDENING PROJECT BETNEEN BAKER AVENUE AND VINEYARD AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to improve Ninth Street as a collector size east-west thoroughfare between Baker Avenue and Vineyard Avenue, and as a consequence sent out Request for Proposals to several engineering companies to design such protect for construction; NHEREAS, the first of Linville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. has represented as qualified to perform the services in Lhe Request for Proposal and was chosen by the City Engineering Staff to provide professional engineering services for field surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for the prfeparation of plans, specifications and estimate for Ninth Street Pavement Rehabilitation Protect. NOM, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Llnvitle C1vi1 Engineers/Land Surveyors, Inc. to provide professional engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and estlmetge for Ninth Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Widening between Baker and Ylneyard Avenues. Such work shall be performed for a fee not to exceed =16,880.00 to be funded by Systems Development Fund. A - -tin^y: C; s~~.,~ t~ an s.n„nr of 1n4 of tM contract amOUnt Shall x150 be established for use under the approval and direction of the City Engineer far extra work or Change Order. during the course of plan preparation. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Peter Tune, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: Approval of Lease Agreement with CCMD for placement of radio equipment at the District's reservoir site at 4822 Archibald Avenue RECDMMEND11TI8N: It is recommended that the City Council approve the lease agreement with Cucamonga County Mater District for placement of radio equipment at the district's reservoir site, located at 4822 Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said lease agreement. Background/Analysis At nrvcvnt, i.hvrv arv mrtlvinn arvac of thv rity uhi rh ha ua marginal radio coverage. In certain instances, this situation requires the Lity employee using the radio to repeat himself or to wait until he is closer to a strong reception area to communicate. Maintenance has determfned that the installation of a radio repeater antenna and related equipment in the northern portion of the City could significantly improve radio reception in these spotty areas. Cucamonga County Mater District will allow the City to install this radio equipment at its reservoir site at 4822 Archibald Avenue. The District is requesting a lease payment of E200.00 per year, to cover the cost of electricity. One additional benefit of the equipment is that it would allow P.M. surveillance and on-call personnel (who work after hours, when contact with City base radios is not possible) the ability to directly access the 911 emergency outwork by using a key pad phone patch radio. Their safety in the field would thereby be enhanced. 3~j CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CCND LEASE AGREEMENT APRIL 6, 1988 PAGE 2 The key pad phone patch radios, as well as the repeater antenna and its related equipment, have already been budgeted for fiscal year 1981-88 in the Community Development Engineering Maintenance Section's capital equipment account (01-4647-7044 j. The S20G.00 yearly lease payment will come out of the same section's maintenance and operations account (01-4641_3900). Respectfull itted, RHM:P Attachment A LICENSE AGREEMENT TBIS AGREEMENT is made on the 8th day of March , 1988, between the CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as 'CITY") and the CUCAMONGA COVNTY WATER DISTRICT (hereinafter reFerred to as "DISTRICT"). A. Rer_itals. (i) CITY desires to construct a communications repeater in order to augment its current radio conununication abilities. (ii) DISTRICT awns property within CITY's boundaries which has sufficient open space to accommodate an antenna and related equipment necessary to establish such radio repeater. (iii) DISTRICT is willing to provide said property for CITY's use in accordance ur_~F ,, ,, r,,,, au wnuiclons as are hereinafter set forth in this Agreement. B. Asreement. WBEREPORE, in consideration of the respective and mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. DISTRICT hereby grants to CITY a license to COnStLIICt, OC CdllSe CO be COnstrUCted, and t0 mdlntdi.^. d ra di0 repeater antenna, together with a supporting structure, in accordance with plans and specifications promulgated by CITY and approved by DISTRICT, upon DISTRICT'S property located at 4822 -1- 4~ Archibald,.. within CITY'S boundaries. The specific location of CITY'S antenna shall be mutually agreed upon prior to commencement of construction thereof. 2. DISTRICT fu[ther grants to CITY a license to install and maintain at CITY'S sole expense certain radio equip„-,ent in DISTRICT'S pump house, or in such other structure as may be subsequently agreed upon by CITY and DISTRICT. DISTRICT understands that CITY will require approximately fifteen to twenty square feet for purposes of such installation. DISTRICT further agrees to allow CITY to connect to and utilize DISTRICT'S electrical power to operate said repeater. 3. In consideration of DISTRICT leasing said property and granting the license herein, CITY agrees to pay DISTRICT an annual fee beginning with the sum of Two Hundred Dollars (5200.00) for the first year of this Agreement and, upon mutual agreement, an additional cost above the Two Hundred Dollar (5200.00) sum in succeeding years, 4. DISTRICT shall not be responsible for damage to CITY'S antenna or radio equipment which may occur through vandalism oz otherwise. 5, In the event CITY'S radio equipment interferes with DISTRICT'S operations, CITY agrees to remove or relocate its antenna and radio equipment, as may harpme necessary, ~ub;ect ~~ thirty (30) days prior written notice by DISTRICT. _2_ 42 6. DISTRICT further authori2es CITY to access its equipment during normal business hours for purposes of maintenance and reps ic, 7, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed on an annual basis without further notification by either party, subject to rights of termination as hereinafter provided, Either party may terminate this License Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice being provided to the other party hereto. In the event notice of termination is provided by either party, CITY shall have thirty (30) days after the effective date of termination to remove its equipment as authorized herein. 8. CITY agrees to indemnify and hold harmless DISTRICT and its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims for damages arising out of CITY's performance of this Agreement, 9. All notices required to be given pursuant to this License Agreement shall be accomplished by deposit within the Dnited States Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, and addressed to the other party's established place of business as of the date of such notification, Notices required herein shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of deposit into the custody of the United States Pcs^_al Service. -3- ~3 IR iRTRSSS N96RBOP, the parties hereto have executed this License Agreement on the day and yea[ fi[St hereinabove Set forth. CITY OP RARCBO CDCAMORGA, A Municipal Corporation By: COCAMORGA COOIITY WATER DISTRICT Asaista nt General Mana e[ T tle ATTEST: ne ~...a. O] : City Clerk -4- L/132/License/R.C. 2.6.2 ~~ r,mv nc n ~ wtrun r, rr ~ aenwtr n STAFF REPORT ,;Y~ Date: April 6, 1968 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell M. Maguire, Ctty Engineer By: Paui A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Subiect: Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc., for design of traffic signal and street improvements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. Improvements will also include storm drain construction, utility relocations and right-of-way engineering. It is recommended that Council approve the referenced Agreement authorizing the Mayor to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Ctty and the City Clerk to attest hereto. BACK6ROIRD/AMAlT515: The City Council, at its meeting of Merch 16, 1988, awarded the contract for the design of traffic signal and street improvements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue to ~. F. Davidson nssociates, inc. Inis work also includes modification, replacement ar installation of drainage facilities, relocation of substructures er utilities and acquisition of right-of-way to accomplish the work. Right- of-way acquisition has not been included in this agreement so that a City-supplied right-of-way specialist could appraise and obtain right-of- way using the requisite Cal trans procedures. The referenced Agreement formalizes the award and allows the consultant to begin work Apr11 il, 1988. Respectfully submitted, r RHM. ~:pam CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 ~-81C ~-~C T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Award the Slurry Seal Program, Phase I (Fiscal Year 1987- 1988) Districts 1 thru 9 as shown on the attached maps, to IPS Services, for the amount of 585,182.10 to be funded from 58 300 Funds, Account Number 15-4637-8050 RECOMME114ATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Slurry Seal Program, Phase I (1987-1988) Districts 1 thru 9 as shown on attached maps to the lowest responsible bidder, IPS Servivices for the amount of 585,782.10. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 18, 1988 for the subject pro,Iect. IPS Services is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of 585,782.10 (see attached bid summary 1. The Engineer's ectimatP wac tl?R DfNI. Staff hac vPVl PUPd all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respe y mitted, RHM: L:dl Attachment cc: Purchasing ~ Si a $ 8 ~ ~ a 5 m SS e ~ o 8 ~ w ~ Q g :' $ $ 8 ~ m 2 s Y o ° ~ $ ° $ m ¢ m tt o 3 ' 8 ~ ° ~ '~, ~ ~ V S S ~ ~Fy ~ T n mi •• ~p ~ O ~ W C G m ~ m m o Oi ~ o '.~ h u ~ ~ ,- n ~ ? pp N wi a ~ oa m ~ 3 ~ 8 ~ ~ m m ~ o ~, 0 g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C• m S ~ 3 H r~ ~ ~~ 6 4 0 N .. O O w ~ ~ p N ~ ~ o V 7 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m ~ ~ „ V S p N LL V1 N J O ~ N N O ~ Y ~ ti Yj fry .y J i N y O J K N o Y L OI C 6 + u a g ~ ~ ~ ~ u Y 6 ~ b y9 vi y 4 N N r ~ EL ~+ V N V1 Af 4n R #~ d S T g s N_ N O A 1 n y Q n 8 g m 5 M p v G N N O ~ W Vm W N 9 O N i i cGG ~~~ ~+ e v i m W n _ p ~ m P € Y T O M S sT T V r e E 1 g ki ° > ~ S n i ~ 7~ W ti A t Y ~ 8 W O b W V O m ~_ P N N O # ~ o G 8 0 p yO m n_ .. 0 J p~ T 0 8 s 1~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUB.IECT: Release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 6911, located at 10955 Arrow Route, submitted by Walter E. Heller, Factors, Incorporated REC01lIENMTIQI: it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing the sub,~ect agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to cause said release to record. Background/Analysis A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for construction of a median island on Arrow Route was approved by Council on September 2, 1981, and recorded on October 22, 1981, as document No. 81-234424, in the office of the County Recorder. Can Rarnardinn rn„nr„ l.al if orn ia. "'~ " The City's General Plan classifies Arrow Route as a maJor arterial and does not require a median to be built. The developer is requesting that the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement be released at this time. Respectful submitted, RH .LB:sd Attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ a ~ ~CO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONFA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM WALTER E. HEELER, FACTOR, INCORPORATED WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 81-134 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Walter E. Heller, Factor, Incorporated; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on October 22, 1922 as Document No. 81-234424; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shalt cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~~ iC95$ ARRCIJ RuUTE J . _.wuw •-- -- -- - ---------- _ i°' ~ __ } v~~1~ .... I ..... a '°°'0 PARCEL M P 6911 `~Ig4 PgRC EL 1 P~Por ¢ of r) w w lir) ~ j N Y n~r 7 a i i n K ~ 9iKK OqK 1 }~}pK z .p y, ® \~,~ ~J br I ~ IY11 _4 !C ~ )Afi ~ P.Y /6~ 3 } ~ d ~ A,, ,.rz ~1 U r~'~ O ' ®~~ U r ~ 1 P (~ }~d[ 2~LC YMK Y/i r Y~r r " ~~.V.t }Yi} ~ a Q ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ' I _ }`'_- ~ wwn.. - _ rN _. _ -_ I n ~zl R U I ~ V i~ i n. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DlVtBION V N ITEM: +~+„~= PARCEL MAP 6911 PARCEL I EXH<81T; K~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~""' r, GATE: April 6, 1988 ,,.,, T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ~ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InspectarC~t~2 ' SUBJECT: Release of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Tract 13057 located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Fairmont Avenue RECONEIOATION: it 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution releasing Tract 13057, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the City Clerk to release said agreement and security. Background/Malysis Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities were accepted by the City Council fer Tract 13057 on October 8, 1987, to replace bonds ,.r...i,. _. •.. r -.•~~~•~ -~^.piw ,y iy wuiwii u„ iwyuaL 7, i>oo fUr IraCL 1JV0l. The Developer, N1111am Lyon Company, is requesting a release of agreement and security for Tract 13057 to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f460,000 Labor and Matertai Bond: 5230,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfu~.ly) submitted, ~ r ~i' ~~~~~ RHM:~SMG jm Attachments 52 RESOLUTION N0. S ~ l/~O I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPRDVIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IiPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13057 IIHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration the release of Improvement Agreemant for, Tract 13057 an April 6, 1488, by N1111am Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property generally located at the southwest corner of Highland and Fairmont Avenues; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and suD~ect to the terns thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Tract 13057; and NHEREAS, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, for Tract 13051 was approved at the October 8, 1987, City Council. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal/forma, that said Improvement Agreement for Tract 13057 and said Improvement Security date July 26, 1986, are hereby released, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to release said agreement and security. ~ ~.~-, S ~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreements and Improvement Security for OR 87-16, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard submitted by General Telephone Company of California RECOMMEMOATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreements and security and authorizing the MAyor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND DR 87-16, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard in the General Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 12, 1987. The developer, General Telephone of California, is submitting agreements and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements to the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f10,000 Labor and Material Bond: f 5,000 The developer is also submitting an agreement to construct a proposed future street along the southerly boundary of his protect and to remove a drive approach on Etlwanda Avenue. Copies of the agreements and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater Oistrict. Resp f ply muted, , ,, ~~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0. 8 ~ ' ~ 7 O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEN N0. 87-16 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration Improvement Agreements executed on January 27, 1987, by General Telephone of California as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Etiwanda, south of Foothill Boulevard; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreements and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conJunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Coa~isslon, Develoqaent Review No. B7-16; and NHEREAS, sold Improvement Agreement 1s secured and accoaganied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified 1n said Improvement Agreement. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the sauce are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign Bald Improvement Agreement nn behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 55 /M7R~LL e~.w h EI.D a.sMan - t` INNIW X100 <. 'pl~v W% [M7MM E _ • NCCN YNW 'IIIM~MC1/1 w rELo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DM9ION ARROW NWV ~i ~'-HUl'!I-YAMILY IbUGU6 Ca1PLF% ~.Rq MtwwNf ~RHAi[ G~ oRM w N ~: r~N O.R. 87-16 5 ~a ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 i-,- ... T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ~ Sl1BJ ECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreements and Improvement ~ Security for Tract 12870, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, between Ettwanda and East Avenues, submitted by Rafi Jav1d, AAM Investments, a California general partnership. and NADFT, a California Limited Partnership. RECOMIENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 12870, accepting the subJect agreements and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign Bald agreements and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROOND Tract 12810, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, between Etlwanda and East Avenues, in the very low residential Development Otstrict, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 1987, for the division of 66.9 acres into 68 lots. The Developers, Rafi Javid, AAM Investments, a California general partnership, and NAOFT, A California Limited Partnership, are submitting agreements and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Deveioper Type Faithful Labor and Performance Material Bond NADFT, a California Off-Sites L1 ,373,000 t686,500 Limited Partnership Storm Drain 774,000 387,000 AAM Investments Victoria Bastn and Etiwanda Storm Drain 822,000 411,000 Letters of aDProval ha•re been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Nater District. C.C.6R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney and copies of the agreements and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp u lye ubmltted, Atta Jr~ RESOLUTION N0, g0 ~ ~ ~ I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON811, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AOAEEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL IMP OF TRACT N0. 12870 NHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12870, consisting of 68 lots, submitted by Raft Javtd, AAM Investments a California general partnership, and NADFT, a California Limited Partnership, Subdividers, located on the north side of Highiand Avenue, between Etiwanda and East Avenues, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and 1n compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of sold City; and NHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as orerequtsite to approval of the F1na1 Map of said Tract Bald Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreements suMltted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and suffident Improvement Security, and submits for approval said F1na1 Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as Follows: That said Iaprorement Agreements be and the same are approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto: anA That said Ingrovement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject t0 approval as to farm and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of sold City. K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIdEERING DMBION rr~: T~l TRACT 12870 N EXHIBII~ ~q nrmv no n •,rn rtn nr+n .......... STAFF REPORT ,, GATE: April 6, 1988 ~':.. T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician i SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for 8162 Ninth Street, submitted by Oscar Meza '~, RECOlIFJIDIITION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,iect agreement and security and authorizfng the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Oscar Meza, the owner/developer of 8162 Ninth Street, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Certificates of Deposit C ~i IFC ~I O~..f ~....~n ~~~ ta.nflll Lahor and Material: 52,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectful ubmi tted, ~/ HM• ead T Attachments 60 RESOLUTION N0. 88 , ) /~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 8162 NINTH STREET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 21, 1988, by Oscar Meza as developer, for the improvement of pubt is right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 8162 Ninth Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described fn said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~f' I ~_~ ~ ~ ~~ _I Z I J 1w J J I ~~ ~IGZ NINTH r V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA xxG~xxu~ta ntvistox ~ a... 1 ~~ Y9 ~ B `V ~ ~~ J) re ~ _ 39 ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ t• ~...n- fi _ r. 4 '~• ~ '. ~ J ~i ~'~'ti.u-'t J1 lV d ~ ~ ~ 31 32 j JJ ~'~ h For LOS ca ~ i ~ C~. 1J M, 3C ~ ~~ _ 21 ~~ 3 `~ ~ u r,+: ~ ., p1q ~ v. o~ ~ ~SALINA ~g ! p ~ AJ ". I ~. i ~ ,. °'1O1r~ ~~ 3 ~ C (~~ ~ ~l i~81 G3 6P ~ 61 ~ 60 ~ 2 3 d~ 5 ~' 5~ ~ t B 4 e ~ ~ ~ Y r~ ~a. ~ .: ~ I I .u. 1 ~ I I ~ - • -~, N rrEe~: ~& 8152 NINTH St0.EET ~xxisrr; ~2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '" DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tracts 12802-2, -5 and -6 (Off-Site Storm Drain), located east of Spruce Avenue and south of Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes of California RECONFJ1011TION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,lect agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tracts 12802-2, -5 and -6, located east of Spruce Avenue and south of Mountain View Drive, in the Terra Vista Planned Community, were approved by the City Council on February 5, 1986. The Developer, Lewis Homes of Cal ifornta, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site Storm Drain improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E134,000 Labor and Material Bond: f 67,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectful submitted, RHM: ~ "~ Attachments ~O3 RESOLUTION N0. ~'g -1 7 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 12802-2, -5 ANO -6 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its Consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 15, 1988, by Lewis Names of California, a general partnership, as developer, for the impravenent of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located east of Spruce Avenue, south of Mountain View Drive; and WHEREAS, the installattan of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and su6~ect to the terms thereof, is Lo be done in consunction with the development of said Tracts 12802-2, -5 and -5; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good anA sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby aDProved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. l ~ V I I ~4 ~ ~ crTy 0~ ~ R~CHO CUCgMONGA fit: N EATC,IIyE,~O 0~91ON ma~yy~~,,,~,, rRncr isaoz-x, -s and -6 X05 _'~- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecter•~~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP 85-14, located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street, submitted by Muller Company RECOMMENR11TI011 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for CUP 85-14 were approved by the City Council on March 71, 14Rfi, in iho fnlln~i~~ ~„_i~~t~. Faithful Performance Bond: f78,000 Labor and Material Bond: E39,000 The developer, Muller Company, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Cierk's Office. Resp c suhmitted, i ,~~.,__I :SMGa~~ ~ . Attachments (o(o RESOLUTION N0. S b '~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGq, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 85-14 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for fts consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension ezetuted on Aprii 4, 1988, by Muller Company as developer, for the Tmprovement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street; and NMEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said CUP 85-14; and NHEREgS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. `. ', h ~~ rnmv no o w wrr vn rn rn , „nwrn . STAFF REPORT - r- DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FP,OM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 10827, 10827-1, 10827-2 and 10821-3, located on Man zanita Drive between Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Relco, Industries. RfC01lEN011TION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,lect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tracts 10827, 10827-1, 10827-2 and 10827-3 were -•••••+ ~,, .he racy rnnnril nn June 18, 1987, for and 8-month period, in the uy Yi ..~ following amounts. Tract Faithful Performance Labor & Material No. Bond Bond_ 10827 E350,000 x175,000 10827-1 898,000 449,000 10827-2 661,000 330,500 10827-3 420,000 210,000 The developer, Relco, Industries, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respec ~y~~~ubmitted,/~ - RH .SM Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ a ~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT NOS. 10827, 10827-1, 10827-2 AND 10827-3 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for Sts consideration an Improvement agreement Eztension executed on April 6, 1988, by Relco, Industries as developer, for the improvement of oublic right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Manzanita Drtve between Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue, south of Wilson Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done Tn conjunction with the development of said Tract Nos. 10827, 10827-1, 10827-2 and 10827-3; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sfgn said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the fity of Ranrhn fur amnnna and iha Pity fln~6 hn aH<cf fharahn kF- ~~ -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '~~"`' ' ,. DATE: April 6, 1988 i T0: City Councll and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 6i1111and, Public Works Inspec4er-~"-t SUBJECT: Approval of Iaprovea~ent Agreeaw;nt Extension for Tract 11932, located on the south side of Finch Avenue at Bandola Street, sub~ltted by C.T.K. Incorporated RECONEMOATION It is recaa>wended that the City Councll adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subiect agreeaknt extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign sold agreeaw!nt. AMALYSIS/BACK6RWND Iagroveeent Agreeaw!nt and Iaiproveeient Security to guarantee the construction of the public lagroveax!nts for Tract 11932 were approved by the City Councll on March 6, 1986, 1n the following aaqunts. taitntui Yertorwance Bond: 543,000 Labor and Material Bond: 521,500 The developer, C.T.K. Incorporated, is requesting approval of a 12-wonth extension on said ingroveiaent agreeaw:nt. Copies of the Iagrovewent Agreeaa!nt Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. RespeCtf 1 uMaitted, ~ ~ ,~. AttacNnents /~ RESOLUTION N0. $ $ ~I / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVENENi AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11932 MHEREAS, the C1ty Council of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaeanga, California, has for 1tt consideration an Iagroveaw!nt Agreeaknt Extension executed on April 6, 1986, by C.T.K. Incorporated as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specif1ca11y described Lherein, and generally located on the south side of F1nch Avenue at Bandola Street; and /IHEREAS, the installation of such improveaM•nts, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and subiect to the tens thereof, 1s to be done in conJunctlon with the development of said Tract 11932; and NHEREAS, said improvement Agroement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agraement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED by the C1ty Cou~11 of the C1ty of Rancho Cucammnga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the soak are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign sold Iaprovement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the C1ty Cllerk to attest thereto. i ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: To: From: By: Subject: April 6, 1988 c~~oyc .~' } ~~I IA Fi ~ Z 1977 ~~ Mayor, Members of City Council, and City Manager Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator Acceptance of a Grant Deed for Spruce Avenve Park RBCOMMENDI\TIO That City Council accept from Lewis Homes of California, a Grant Deed for Spruce Avenue Park. HACRGROOND- The Park Development Agreement between Lewis Homes and the City calls for the Terra Vista Planned community to develop seven Neighborhood Parks. Spruce Avenue Park completes the second facility ae park of 4h .. -•• agra=Wa:a. Ci Ly a:uuncii accepted the construction improvement on August 5, 1987 and to complete the transaction Lewis Homes hereby transfers title to the land. Respectfully submitted: R~~ 2zo Assistant City Manager RAR:DL;bs 72 ~•• xinvi~vx 1JCAA1 ^, STAFF REPORT ~~'~ ~ ~ 9, Q ~~ ~~i ~ U'a `-19]7 DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Mayor, Members of [he City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A, Rizz¢, Asais Cant City Manager '~ SUBJECT: RELOCATION LOAN FOB COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a loan in the amount of $8,000 at an interest rate of eight percent (8S) to he repaid within forth-eight (48) months for relocation cos to incurred by Community Services Manager. BACKGAOUND• In the recruitment for the Cammun icy Service Manager. poa i[ion, the [op candidate ie presently located in DeerFie ld. Illinois (rh;rson o e,l n_.. .. otter for this position, this person will need to relocate to RanchoV Cucamonga. The coat of relocation from Illinois to Southern California for a family of five is approximately $10,000. Mr. Jceeph Schultz, the new Community Service Menage r, hoe requea tad the City loan him en amount of $8,000 for moving and related relocation expenses. This loan would be at a rate of 8S for a period of forty-eight months. The total amount of [he loan with interest would be $10,596.56, and will be repaid to [he City of Rancho Cucamonga in 104 ins to llmenta of $101.89 ae s payroll deduction. Additionally, if Mr. Schultz ehou ld leave the amp loymen[ of the City anytime during this forty-eight month period of time, then the remainder of the loss end interest would become due end payable within sixty days of hie termination. If you have any questions or concerns regarding Chia metier, feel free [o concoct me. RAR/dje 73 CZ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 28, 1988 Mr. Joseph H, Schultz 921 Wilmot Rood Deerfield, IL 60015 Dear Mr. Schultz: Post OIII¢ Ba, Bat, R.ncM CuumenY. aYifomi. 91tJ0, (tIA 9g9~I g51 This correspondence will serve to confirm our previous discussions concerning your proposed employment with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. As o material portion of our discussions, we have discussed the issue or reimbursement for moving expenses incurred by your relocation from (Illinois) to Rancho Cucamonga. As a result of the offer of employment mode to you on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, you will be relocating in the City of Rancho Cucamonga thereby generating moving and related relocation expenses. The purpose of this correspondence is to provide a written agreement of the potties with respect to the basis upon which the City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide to you the sum of $8,000.00 as and for moving and relocation expenses and your repayment of that loan. Accordingly, the City of Rancho Cucomongo will provide to you the sum of $8,000.00, by .u ..:.rr..~.' p~~wi' J /G ily ., c~ ..vliuii <nycuaw. w i in iiivi IcyUl u, you agree to repay the City of Rancho Cucomongo said sum of $8,000,00, together with 8% interest, per annum, in four years. Said $8,000.00 with interest (total loon amount of $10,596,56) will be repaid to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 104 equal installments of $101.89, deducted from your payroll checks payable to you during said 4 year period of time. Alternatively, should you leave the City's employ a} any time during said 48 month period, then, and in that event, the remainder of said $8,000.00 (with interest to date) will become due and payable within sixty (60) days of your termination from employment with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Should you agree with the above provisions, please execute this letter ogreemenf of the place noted below and dote the some. We would appreciate the spousal consent acknowledgment attached hereto, The City Council will consider this matter ai (is April 6, 1988 meeting for final approval. The copy of this letter agreement is for your file. Very truly yours, ~9~obSr1 A. Assistant Ci Manager RAR:mk Attachment CouadgnMn qy... Deborah N, Brown JeRrey Ring coy nro~,yo Dennis L. Stout Chutes 1. Bvquel II ~ Puneb J. Wright tauten M. Wwenn1n 4 I agree to the above letter agreement pertaining to a loan for relocation expenses in the amount of $10,596.56. Dated: 3 3~ 88 ployee ^ SPOUSAL COfLSEMT I acknowledge that I have read the foregoing letter agreement dated March 28, 1988 and that I know its contents. I am aware that by its provisioiu~ my husband is dealing with specific property rights, including property r(ghis inherent in public employments and including my rnmmunity Interest therein. I consent to the agreement and approve its provisions. el i ~I `J ~1 ~D-~/ oared: ~ 3~ >, ______~ byl,[! ~ ~ 1 U~~ ~" "~ e ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the Ci[y Council P I20M: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager BY; Linda D. Daniels, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUD.IECT: PROPOSED SALE OF RONOS PO R DEVELOPMENT OP FIRE PR O'1'E CTIO N PACILITIES ~ ~t1GAfo'~c ~ 'n ~ l{j O C~pQ~' ~ F'' U Z JL_ 9 1977 RECOMME9UATION: Approve the sale of bonds by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the development of a Reimbursement Agreement to pay the deb[ service on the bonds from tax increment revenue from Fund 25 - Fire Protectior. Funds. BACKGROUND: When the Redevelopment Agency Pr o,jeot Area was Formed, an Agreement between the Agency, the Poothlll Pire Protection District and tha City was established. The porpcse of the Agreement was to establish areas where the AP,e ncy and the City could support the development oL fire protection facilities using a portion of the Agency's tax increment revenue. One of the Driorities established in ttris Agreement was the development of r,a pital facilities for the benefit of the Project Area. F'or the past fiscal year Agency and FSre Uistrict staff have been working on the. acquisition of land and the design of fire protection racirrnes. [n oraer to develop the first two fire protection facilities, it was the intent for the Agency to sell bonds which were suPpor t,ed by the tax increment from Fund 25 - Firs Protection Fund. The bonds that are to be sold would be Dried on the original Plan bonding and revenue limitations. at the present. time three lawsuits have been filed against Amendment \b. 1 to the Redevelopme of Plan. These lawsuits do not affect the original Plan, including its bonding and tax Increment revenue limitations. The Agency has adequate bonding capacity and tax increment revenue to support. an issue for the benefit of developing fire facilities, however, staff 1s concerned that the issne might not he wvll rr. r. rived in the financial community because of the pending lawsuits on the Plan Amendment. For this reason staff has invest igatcd other alternativr,s to the sale of bonds for the „o~c.o ymeut of fire, pruiaclion facilities. `~7 EVALL'ATiOH: In speaking with Jones. Hall, Hill & White about the Agency's pending lawsuits they indicate an acceptahle alternative would be Cur the City of Rancho Cucamonga to sell bonds. These bonds would be initially secured 6y the City's general fund. 'f he Redevelopment Agency would in turn have an Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to reimburse the general fund from the t.ax increment revenue from Fund 25. [n this structure, the City would be able to sr~;' ends, e; iiniuaiiug the c;uud of Coe lawsuits presently filed against Plan Amendment Nc. 1. The Ci i,y~s general fund would be reimbursed fur al] bond debt service associated with the sale of the bonds. The end result still provides for the Agency paying the bonds through thn portion of tax increment reserved for fire protection projects. This structure does contain an advantage [hat would not be poss]ble under a bond issue sold by the Agency. Since the bonds would have the appearance of a double security, the City's general fund and the Redevelopment Agency tax increment, staff has been informed that an issue can be sold leveraging all available increment rather than just 75%. In the past, rating agencies have not allowed the sale of an Assue which maximizes available revenue, thus, although an Agency could afford selling a larger bond Issue they would he restricted from doing so. This same type of double security has been used in the C.ity's Mello Roos Issue for the Uay Creek Flood Control Channel. The bonds are being secured frog two sources, Redevelopment Agency tax increment and a levy parn by property owners. At the pra!s r•nt time, the market is very receptive [o tax exempt bonds. interest rates are in the range of 7.8% to 8.25%. It was originally anticipated to sell a bond issue after the dnslgn of the facil.i ties was complete. ]t is being re r.omme nrlsd, hnwevr•r, that an issue br. seld within the next few months in order to capture the low interest ratr.s. if the Clty and Agency were to wait until after the design of the facilities, the sale would not occur untll late 1988. This woultl make a sale immediately after a presidential electlon and some concern has been expressed on how the electlon results might affect interest rates. Staff proposes that the issue be structured using the services of Jones, HaJ I, Gill 8 Whitt. as Bond Counsel and Stone & Ynungherg as invr. e'vm r.ni Ranker. Kespe r,t fully subm/i /t)ted, Lauren M. Wasserman Executive Ulrector /8 ---- CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry 8. Fulwoofl, Resource Center Coordinator ^. i ~ 3 ~, I SUBJECT: Approval for payment not to exce efl $6,000 for Absorption Study for proposed Community Facilities District, Etiwanda Highlands (88-11 fznm funds deposited with the City by The Caryn Company. Staff recomrt~e nds that City Council approve payment not to exceed $6,000 for Absorption Study for proposed Community Facilities District, Etiwanda Highlands (88-11 Erom funds .-e...,:L~O ....... ...... .. Lr ti ..... .-'ryn ..'c..ra :y. EVALUATION: On December 2, 1987 City Council approved Reimbursement and Service Agreements Eor a feasibility study, advance funding, formula development and legal advice in preparation of the formation of the Etiwanda Highlands Community Facilities District proposed by The Caryn Company. The Caryn Company provided advance funding for payment of these services. In addition to the services and agreements previously approved by City Council, it has been determined that a Market Absorption Study was needed to provide information necessary in establishing the tax rate formula for those nr.~p?roes within the honndary of the nrnnnsed district. ~Tne study will provide product types/price ranges for residential units and the absorption schedule for each of the residential product types within the Etiwanda Highlands project. ~q Page 2 of 2 The necessary funds Eor payment of the study are available through the funds 3eposited •„•i th the City by The Caryn Company. Respectfully submitted, ~ LL ~ ~ ~' ~4~. i Robert A~RiZZO~` l Assistant City Manager RAE2:JBF:sgr Attachment: Empire Economics Service Agreement SO n ., 1 ~ ~' 1 G 7 1,-i,l, ,r4:` i l ~ Cn Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rl 1 1~ ~ March 23, 1988 Joseph N. DiIOrio Tne Caryn Company 2831 Tarry Road Laguna Beach, CA 92651 SUBJECT: MARKET ABSORPTION STUDY PROPOSED CITY CFD 89-1 Dear Joe: I ~ ~ ! ~ ~. 1 Pul OEk Boy 101. NurJto Cw~mM. g4bu1 911)0. 11M 9W.IIyI 1 Enclosed please Flnd a copy of Joseph Evans proposal For the above subject absorption study. Thia latter i• a request for your approval to axpaad dollars from your deposit on flla with the Clty Eor payment of the study. Please indicate your epproval by signlnq below and returning this letter to the City. Thank you. I Si¢cerely, i Jerry B. Pulwood Resource Canter Coordinator JBF:BC:sgr Enclosure[s///~~ /~ A v (l:/ / / 1 Jo~,~sph L/N,~(/.!//D/S I`~~o(r io ~1/ • ! Data • ...,.....n„ 1 sn•~~.e n N. .. ~, ~ 1 Si .n ~L.J,+1 N•••p~•i 11 $~ lalb.y Mu1 CY, w^W" 1'.nnJ+I Wnylu iwu~nN Wls e. m,.. EMPIRE ECONOMICS Economic-Real Estate Consultants Joseph Janczyk Evans, Ph.D. 35505 Camino Capistrano, Suite 200 Capistrano Beach, California 92624 26300 La Alameda, Suite 310 Mission Viejo, California 92641 (714) 661-7012 March 16, 1988 Mr. Jerry B. Fulwood Resource Centet Coordinator City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Market Absorption and Product Type Study for The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project Dear Mr. Fulwood: Tnis will serve as our Agreement regarding the Market Absorption and Product Type Study for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's CFD for The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project. Accordingly, this Agreement will nYn\)I ICY nn ifh Aoen.~i ..rinn r.f •hn ...i .. _ _ .di performed along with the financial considerations andyt ime ~raquirements for the study. Credentials ~ Qualifications ~ Emoire Economics Empire Economics specializes in performing market demand studies for residential, commercial and industrial projects located throughout the Southern California region. We have conducted a substantial number of market studies for projects in San Bernardino County, in particular, including the following: * Chino Hills: Absorption schedules for some 30,000 residential units as well as 900 acres of commercial and industrial development. * Mello Roos, Assessment District and Mortgage Revenue Bond Studies that have included the Master Planned Communitea of Victoria Village, Terra Vista, Creekeide and Southridge village. Consequently, we have extensive experience in analyzing the housing market in southern California, and san Bernardino County as well as Rancho Cucamonga, in particular. Page $2 .,.- .• GC~.nnfU STAFF AEPOI~.T ~~' , ~.I ~~ i~ p JI ti I 1977 GATE: March 23, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Direc for BY: Elizabeth Stoddard, Assistant Finance Director SUB JEC is ESTABLISHMENT OF RESERVE ACCOUNT IN SYSTEMS DEVELDPNENT RECpMENDATIDN Approve the esra blishment of a Reserve Account in the Systems Deveiopment fund for segregation of available fund balance. BACKGROUND In order to properly account for and track in-lieu funds received from developers, it is r.ecessa ry from time tc time to reserve these fees for future construction costs. Such is the purpose for the creation of this reserve account. Interest will be calculated on the reserve amount at such time the reserve is made available fund balance and reau fired for [nnstrurtinn. Respectfully submitted, ~. ~~_ i Administrative Services Director JH:ES:cp ~~ Description ,qj Economic Research The primary objective of the study is to determine the expected Product Types and also the Market Absorption of the residential projects located within The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project. This will be accomplished through a comprehensive and professional analysis of the following factors: general plan land-use and zoning conditions, economic trends and the housing market demand/supply conditions, both presently ae well as in the future. Accordingly, the specific components of the study are as follows: Introduction: * Description of The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project * Delineation of the Market Regions A. Product Types for The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project * General Plan and zoning Designations * Specific Plan and Tentative/Recorded Map Approvals * Development Plans by Prospective Builders (CONFIRMED BY CONTACTS WITH THS PROSPECTIVE BUILDERS) B. Housing Demand in the Market Reggion by Price Range * Demographic/Economic Trends in San Bernardino County * composition of San Bernardino County's Economic Bases * Growth Potential of San Bernardino County's Economic BaBea * Fnrorta at oP Hnuwinc remand for the Market Region Distribution of Housing Demand in the Market Region C. Housing Supply and Capture Rate for the Candidate Projects * Comparable Projects in the Market Region * competitiveness of the Comparable Projects * Competitiveness of the Candidate Projects * Capture Rate for the Candidate Projects D. Absorption Schedule for The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project * Demand for Housing in the Project Market Area * Adjustments to Demand for Market Mortgage Rates, Housing Product Type and Price Range * C'aptuCe Rate for The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project (RELATIVE TO PROJECTS IN THE MAREET AREA AND PROJECTS IN THE FOOTHILL PIRE DISTRICT) + Absorption Schedule and Sell-out Time for The Highlands 1n North Etiwanda Project Page 83 Thus, the market/feasibility analysis systematically proceeds from expected product types of the candidate projects to the various general demographic, economic, and financial market conditions and then arrives at the specific market absorption schedule for the candidate projects in The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project. Consequently you will be able to determine the following: + The product types/price ranges for the residential units in The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project. • The absorption schedule for each of the residential product types in The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project. The fee for the analysis, including the time as well as all of the attendant costa, is estimated to 6e $C,500-$6,000 and will nut exceed $6,000. The retainer of $3,000 is due upon the commencement of the report and the final payment of $1,500-$3,000 is due once the final report is reviewed, but not later than 10 days after the report is delivered. The fee includes ten copies oP the final report; any additional copies will be billed separately. ~@ Re ired The study will commence upon execution of this Agreement and will be completed within two-three weeks thereafter. Furthermore, meetings will be scheduled, if so desired, to provide you with "progress reports". Giueino To indicate your agreement with the above terms and conditions, sign in the designated space below and return one copy oP this agreement. I am certainly looking Porward to the opportunity oP working on The Highlands in North Etiwanda Project with you. 9 pear Y, i .__._ i ( __ __ ' Jdpe ~ arlozyk Evans, Ph.D. Eaon S.~ onsultant JJE:rm APPROVED: . ~„ \\ - - --~_-Y./~~i6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Date l,~Egp i/r Economics Dete Joedph Janczyk Evans, Ph.D. Page 0 °4 STAFF REPORT GATE: gpril 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D, long, Sr. Public Works Inspector "~ SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Red Hill Park Maintenance Building Improvement Protect, funded from Capital Improvements Facilities - Account No. O1-4647-1043 RECOMENOIITION: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the "Red Hill Park Maintenance Building" Improvement protect to be funded from Capital Inprovements Facilities, Account No. 01-4647-7043 and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." Background/Analysis The subtect protect plans and specifications have been completed by Meyer anA ac<nrial cc of Irvin •N n.nA ~~ .toss -d .yp~3 bj Li~c ~li.y Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is 575,000.00. Legal advertising fs scheduled for April 27, 1988 and May 4, 1988 with the bid opening at 2:00 on Thursday, May 12, 1988. Respectf submitted, RH :MDL: cc: Purchasing 8s RESOLUTION N0. ~0 ~l ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFi CATIONS FOR THE "RED HILL PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. MHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the plans and spc if ications presented 6y the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Red Hill Park Maintenance Building". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bitls or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit; "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council oT cne i,iLy uF nuuclw C'" an^,a, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 12th day of May 1988, sealed bids or proposals for the "Red Hill Park Maintenance Sul lding" in said City. Bids will he opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, Bids must he made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Red Hill Park Maintenance Building". PREYAiLING WAGE: Netice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles ? and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work, In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California ~~ is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the Cfty Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency a15o shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1177.5 of the Labor Cade as amended 6y Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Rttentfon is directed to the provisions in Sections 1771.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning 4he employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor anp toying tradesmen in any apprenticea6le occupation to apply to the Joint aDDrenticesh ip Comm ttee nearest thr cite of the ni~hlir ~nrYe nrn_io_r_r_ ann which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a - certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual ba51s statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered appentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. 8 The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or 3ourneymen in any apDrenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the puClic works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Adninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or fran the Oi vT si on of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of Cal lfornia as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (125.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, far each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8f hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements flied in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, ar bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract ff the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall became the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by tha City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100X) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will 6e considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been ', ssued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Cal ifarnia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, Dlans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of S25.OD said S25.OD is ranrefundable. Upon written request by the kidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of 515.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reiect any and all 61ds. By order of the Counci; of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Gated this _ day of , 1g / ~~ 89 - C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6,1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Puhiic Works Inspector SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" far the Lion Street Extension portion of the City Corporation Yard Improvement Project, located south of 9th Street, to be funded by Civic Facility, Account No. 72-4285-6028 It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Lion Street Extension Dortion of the City Corporation Yard Improvement project, Located south of 9th Street, to be funded by Civic Facility, Account No. 72-4285-6028 and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Native Inviting Bids." Background/gnalysis The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by Aow~iateu Engineers or unc ario, reviewed Dy staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is (40,000, Legal advertising is scheduled for April 13, 1988, and gpril 20, 1988, with the bid openfng at 2:00 PM on Thursday, April 28, 1988. Respectful y submitted, ,` cc: Purchasing -1~ RESOLJTION N0. 8 ~ "'! ~ 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LION STREET EXTENSION PORTION OF THE CITY CORPORATION YARD SOUTH OF 9TH STREET", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING RND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and spc if ications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby aDProved as the plans and specifications for "Lion Street Extension Portion of the City Corporation Yard South of 9th Street". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk fs hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed Bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following wards and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITIND SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" „_..,._. n_. _u-_ .e .~ wur~Ci i Li pile i.i ly ui nauuiw Cu~mnuuya, San BernardinoVCounty,'Cal ifornia,~direct ing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 28th day of April 1988, sealed Bids or proposals for the "Lion Street Extension Portion of the City Corporation Yard South of 9th Street" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Raad, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "Lion Street Extension Portion of the City Corporation Yard South of 9th Street". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, Che Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for hoiiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the l1 office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request, the Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as pensalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollare (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or Dortion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Lobar Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1717.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1177.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any aDDrenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works Droject and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate o' approval. The cert if icat2 will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the nun~er of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he emplcys registered appentices on all of his contracts nn an annual average of not less than one apprentice tc eight ,journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenti ceable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1117.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. ~~ Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the A6ninistrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinhefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to lahor more than eight (Bj hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10X) of the amount of said 61d as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the f.i ty of Ran rhn f.uramnnaa. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be aDPlied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the dffference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an addi tionai bond in an amount equal to fifty Cercent (50X) of the contract price for said work shall he given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contrctor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules q3 and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Callforni a. Copies of the plans and specifications will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of ;25.00, said ;25.00 is nonrefundable. U;;on written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed wfien said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreinbursable payment of ;15.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in Lhe Pions and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this _ day of , 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this _ day of 19 ayor ATTEST: y er ~'~-~ °~4 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Civil Engineer -,: SUBJECT: Confirmation of City Council Action on October 21, 1987, (Item E2 under Advertised Public Hearings) with regard to Tract No. 13541 which is located north of Red Hill County Club Drive and east of Valle Vista on Sierra Vista Drive RECONFJIBATION: It is recommended that City Council adapt the attached resolution confirming City Council Action on October 21, 1987, with regard to Trait No. 13541, located north of Red Hfll Country Club Drive and east of Valle Vista on Sierra Vista Drive. Background/Analysis At the October 21, 1981, City Council meeting a motion was made regarding the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a residential subdivision of twelve single family lots on 4.3 acres of land in the Low ne>iucuLiai Di>ir icl (Z-3 uweiiinys wii is per aurej, iocaced north or wed Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista Drive. The motion action stated the following: 1. Design of Sierra Vista Drive to be a 36 ft. wide street with rolled curbs and consistent with the residential area to the north. 2. Approval of the Planning Commission recommendation for Red Hill Drive to go through and to be turf block and gated with no driveway cut on Sierra Yista Drive. 3. The alley around the perimeter is not necessary. 4, The tm•naround is okay. 5. Modification to include a knox box. 6. To waive sidewalks. 1. Obtain a code amendment. 9.~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONFIRMATION OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION RPRIL 6, 1988 PAGE 2 Nith regard to Item 2, there seemed to be same problems with the interpretation of the requirements for the emergency access. The initial condition stated that the access be improved to alley standards including a total pavement width of 26 feet, with 6-foot block walls on each side of the access and gates at each end. The action on the appeal stated that the access was to be turf block with no driveway cut on Sierra Vista Drive but did not address the width or the fencing requirement. The intent of the appeal was to have a 20-foot emergency access along the south side of Lot 5 with a 6-foot block wall on the south side only and gates at each end (refer to attached exhibits). Because this is to be a private emergency access, it will not be maintained by the City or the Foothill Fire DTstrict. It will be required to be maintained as a permanent emergency access as a deed covenant, condition and restriction (CC&R). Also to clarify Items 4, 5 6 7. The turnaround mentioned in Item 4 is at the end of Monte Vista Drive. Modification to include a Knox box in Item 4 is for the gates at each end of the emergency access and Item 7, the code amendment is for waiving the requirements for sidewalks in the development. Respe ,ful,ly'submitted, RHM:LEMad ~/ Attachment Gb RESOLUTION N0. S 8 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CONFIRMING CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON OCTOBER 21, 1987, WITH REGARD TO TRACT NUMBER 13541, WHICH IS LOCATED NORTH OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, EAST OF VALLE VISTA ON SIERRA VISTA DRIVE NHEREAS, an appeal was made of the Planning Commission's decision approving Tentative Tract 13541, a residential subdivision of 12 single family lots, located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive at Sierra Vista; and WHEREAS, a motion was made by the City Council to grant the appeal with conditions. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the appeal of Planning Commission's decision for Tract No. 13541 was granted on October 21, 1987, with the following conditions: 1. Design of Sierra Vista Drive to be a 36-foot wide street with rolled curbs and consistent with the residential area to the north. 2. Approval of the Planning Commission recamnendation fora 20-foot wide emergency access fire lane on the south side of Lot 5. The emergency access is to 6e turf block, gated with a 6-foot block wall on south C iAP of Pas ananf anA ~~_ A..i ~.~.~~~ ^.9t ou ui~~~u ,Stu Drive. 3. The alley around the perimeter is not necessary. 4. The turnaround on Monte Vista Drive is okay. 5. Modifications of gates and walls on the emergency access easement to include knot box. 6. To waive sidewalks. 7. To obtain a code amendment to waive sidewalks as recommended in Item 6. 9~ 4 e,~ vrcrNrTY MAP NO SC4L~ ~(,~ Exhibit A t~-~ 124 ti i A//eY ~~ ti ~~ -~e~XCe o. N4;/ ~~ix,~~ wfside .~[q's°i1.F ~ ~ 5 _ f I ~~ }-~ ~( ---- '~~// F° 6e aP.°~-ovtd 6 ;~'O D,'S tract, y o' ~ .-.GL~Y~~= I~ _G ~9h , Eme~9enc {tlr mot/,%'~~es Fixrnen~ knot ^° D~`~'ief. C: f 't° be m4:n hain~d by +wre y or FP jD~b trier ~°~ Comas.[, ~ - ---~-- ~ S/errs V's fa ~" ~~ ~t~JT o-!~ C'~' f~ ~1 Ur7Ci ~ dS infcr'pr-c7/7ad by 9faff, F,re Dts tr:c f 1 ,a•ve%p ~r ~ , FXhi hit 8 qq - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: Ta: From: By: SubJect: April 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager ~a y. . :.; Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer ADProval to concur with staff decision to establish "No Stopping Anytiaw: Zone" on Base Line Road between the Nest City Limits and Milliken Avenue. RECBMMEMDATIBN• It is recomaended that the City Council give its concurrence 1n establlshaent of No Stopping Anyone Zane on Base Ltne Road between lkst City Limits and Milliken Avenue BACK6ROIIINI/ANALYSIS: Last fall, the Council expressed concern that parking on Base Ltne 1n some areas was interfering with traffic and that same parking prohibitions would be advisable. Thfs is in keeping with the recognized practice of prohibiting parking along arterial streets, and is a means of increasing safety and producing a smoother flow of traffic. Nith the increasing traffic volumes 6etng experienced along Base Line, hoth of thcsc :`sc1$ .Oulu' uc ui yreaL ueneii t. In aOel Ll On, 1L has been feUnd that there are no areas where a business or residence 1s dependent on parking on Base Line Road. At the completion of the current work on Base Line, the limits of the protect, Lton Street to Archibald Avenue, will be posted as a No Stopping Zone. Posting of the remainder of Base Line, from west Ctty limit to Milliken Avenue can be done by the Ctty Traffic Engineer under Section 10.44 of the Municipal Code, however, because the intended length of the zone is so great, the City Council's concurrence 1s desireable. Respect .submitted, ~f K~ RNM: PAR~pln~ t7 Q - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Apr11 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer ~ Modification of unit amount used to calculate fees in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead electrical lines RECOMIEIMTIgI: Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution revising the unit amount used to calculate fees 1n-iieu of undergrounding existing overhead electrical tines. BackUround/Analysis: The City Council initially established and has modified the unit amounts yer• iinear• iuui iur unueryruunding in-iieu tees oases upon inr011aation supplied by the utility companies as follows: Unit Amount Per Linear Faot Date Resolution No. 5/21/86 86-143 12/17/86 86-143A 5/20/87 87-245 *Copies attached Electrical Telephone Cable TV 100 50 10 100 75 10 167 75 10 ~~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Modification of Unit Haunt April 6, 1988 Page 2 This proposed modification to the electrical unit amount is a result of an Internal Revenue Service ruling reducing the amount estabiished an May 20, 1987. The letter frog the Southern California Edison Company (copy attached) states that different mounts are to be charged for work coaleeted during different tine periods. Therefore, the Tn-Lieu Fee unit amount should vary depending upon when the lines where fare) undergrounded as foltaws: Time Period 1986 and before 1987 1988 and after Unit Amount/LF 5100 5135 f128 in keeping with previous Council direction, the resoiution also directs staff to refund fees alrea4y collected to excess of the vaunts stated above. The unit amounts for telephone and Lable TY wi17 remain at the current rates of f75 and f10 per linear foot, respectively. Respectf submitted, i 7~ ~RHM:BRR:sfm Attachments ~ 02 s.r. ~ ~~~ Southain Cal/fanN £d/eon Company •]O G[T iOOTMILL [OYL[VMO [YIT[! U~IAHD. CA4fO11NIA [ I ]N CM [CA]L, MYIN! „L,,..,,y l.,,.m February 9, 1988 „ ,.,.,,,, Russ Me Guire City Engineer Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rusa: The following ie the most current information Edison has received pertaining to Contributions in Aid of Construction (CIAC) taxes. The Internal Revenue Service has issued a ruling relative to the income tax treatment of CIAC. The ruling reileratee that utilities moat treat CIAC and other contributions, received ae a provision of service, as taxable income. Rowever, the ruling allows payments received under a government program to be excluded from the tax {ITCC), if it can be shown that the payment does not relate to utility eervieea to or for the benefit of the person making ehe payment, but rather to the benefit of the public at large. Specifically. the zulina_ exemo_ta the aoolica- tion of ITCC to: o Underground conversion projects (Rule 20-B/C) provided by a government agency for purposes of community aesthetics or public safety. o Relocations of utility facilities for a govern- ment agency to accommodate street widening or rerouting. Effective November 20, 1987 the taritfa provide for collec- tion by Edison of a gross up factor of thirty-live percent for 1987 and twenty-eight percent for 1988 on the value of all Con- tzibutiona in Aid of Construction. This change would impact the anount of monies currently 6e i.^.q collected by Ranchc Cucamonga for in lieu of fees on undergroundinq electrical facilities. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have an~c~! ions regarding the CLAC tax. ~`~,. ,.. 7/ a, . Sincerely, ,~ ~.. -. Cheryl Karns ~. CAK:cd cc: Barry Hanson I O 3 RESOLUTION N0. 87-245 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ANENDiNG RESOLUTION N0. 86-143 ESTABLISHING FEES IN-LIEU OF UNOERGROUNOIN6 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES NHEN REQUIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL NHEREAS, the City is in receipt of information from the Southern Callfarnis Edison Company indicating that the average cost of undergrounding electrical lines has increased due to provisions of the 1986 Income Tax Reform Act. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Dy the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucampnga, CaliforMa that the unit amount to be charged for fees in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead electrical lines shall be 5167.00 per linear foot. The amounts for the otMr utilities shall remain at the current rate of f75,00 for telephone and 510.00 for Cable TV. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED tAis 20th day of May, 1987. AYES: Brown, Stout, King, Nright NOES: None ABSENT: Buquet ~ Dennis L. Stdut, Mayo ATTEST: .. ~ / Bever y. ut a et, Ut I. BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City pF Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of safd City Council held On the 20th day of May, 1987, 104 atl0.UTIw /D. t6-1 tl • asw/nw w m elx ew/ea w n[ nx w cacao wraiariA, CLLm//q. OTMLI/am nn n I.IW a w/mwa/m wnuN pmxx I.ao ate aFDraO /T tl.r.m caru/nw ulawda v/Otl/, eYt llwt/y Cewlu/et W Ciq CHKil <! eN CitT a vtKYe Ceet~ttq Ylthw ee dtwt Nt rmtl o! uetlahti) aitt(y ortrtud stil(tT i/ut it eNM H vewu • ret uteNtie tN dntrNL rertiv/ tee Ibiy etrirwtwt dolt Oe Clq{ W voWt pYt Ciq CwtHl rKytNu care ie it eteutttr w utttlitY wNNt [. gvltNls NaH cut W tt K<o~l OY WtRreuediy iv [tt wtr ebt tttKLt.t W..r{ W vWn/, eN Clt) Ctwsil W t1tWy Cetttluitt lKtYK rKytit• ttte It eertdt wwt. !e N St9wKHH1 ev rttvin dHtN/vwe to tNer/sHN stitiMn W CMt It W eHw. ttN N Ilw H sYtytKNly NHN tWteR dtv tK total eetttrtetiw. aw, 2x//000, /i tT a~a.YSO, y Ne C(q Cavtell o! eN Clq et atteN CHtYttit, Ctllttev(t tMt Ntre Ne rttwlq Cswlttlw etrviut p9rtt H !tH it liw N Weei[tWiy, eN iw Adi N ttt tvpevritet eeNAttlvt N eb tellwiy. 1. [Iwtriul LNw - II00 Ht lltwe roar. T. AI+vYeve LIeH - Ib Pu i/aps t<ae. C 7. CNN TJ. - 1I0 vH Ibwr [Kt. nt dt Ntll cowl Nt ta[etattt aetl ts.... ._.__ .._....»..uuy uccuHtq cu velllq ItN4 tWm, Ytawm, W ADOxO ehir IlH an v! vq. 19%. ROt /vtttq [iy, DNI, Yri/ht ao0t aou N/~Tt Mitelt 4 y. W t ATTOTt YiSiud//~( 1~~~jy1 MHU A/ MtNleb Clt2 CttN t, i0/LL2 A. NTitLR, Cix a[R et eb C(t9 et /aeete Cuutoep, Cd llenlt, de OteNT tutll7 tttt tIt letye/y 4telutlee ru duff putty. H9rerN, tN N9KN h7 tb Clq CetH(l N tIt CItT e! [recto Cuuwep. Ctl lleevlt, tt t ryvNr wttly N wld Clp COtK/l Yela w Ot iltt dq O( Yq, IfY. /O~ egacvrlo~ N. N-itl ~ • tuaRlw or as eta rmtea a as eta or rttcro cOCNIttC~. CLL,IwtlL. 1MO}a0 t1Y01.RIA t0. N-1 V, q)YLataO Rq a-ISw 0/ OtNNNOtCaC 0)WgD OaLla LOO t0 ttORlm R RYtli COIt6ttlp 1-ANIL Yvgt, eN elq u It reaftt d Ideewtew trw Wt Gard bittNM Cww4 /tLLwtltt tYt tN tweew wtt d aetetrmLLe{ eeit}\wt Ilwe it ttMw Mu Nw/ewy WIUW. p, ama~t, M It rtwltM, y eN elq Ctweti d tN Ctq d twee Otetttep. Gllretde tNt tN w!t Mt ee M tleetet !w ftw It-Ilw d wYrRewtltt eLLteltt ww\eLL biet-tr Ittn tltll M 777.00 Nr l/twr ewt. rYttO, er/IOrO. tM YDtTO t\lt 17tl Y) d Ouetler, lttt. ~1 trees, tows, Nest, qw ~1 W tY~}+ Mpt OIN/t L. tees[, i}R ~t)O}. .H]. ; /(LIIIw ~ .t/~ N77 t• 1ttNlet. Ctq Clerkr C I, R}ftLf ~. Y1atLR. CIa CLR d W etq d Wtle Gemp, Cdletetlt. Y Nett' wrest} tNt tM ewttt/y ttwiglw wt Yl) MoN, ' ttNetet, eM tYttN y eN elq Cetw/l d tM elq d 4ttle ctettre{t. tellrwge, tt • maw tetti+ w ON Clq rewtll wlt w [w l/te Y) w DeeeeMe, lfN. bw<d t\le IM Y) d terttNe, f1N to tw\e Ceweettt. Glletrt/e. Q //~~~ //~1 ~~ n~1 ~' L7\.~ L/1df. GC.LMta „t{,gle+.~ty wl} t. tetMbt, ely Cttr\ ~~ The is CC's 4: ..,, _ i ... „~~ .a -. ~ . o?TEST: ~ll.__¢+! '.~ City Clt{~ Rsncrc~ Cd.'zr„rt;,t .rail ~~W RESOLUTION N0. p 0 ~ I a" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO 87-245 AND ESTABLISHING A REVISED SCHEDULE OF FEES IN-LIEU OF UNDERGROUNDING E%ISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES WHEN REQUIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL WHEREAS, the City is in receipt of information Fran the Southern California Edison Company indicating that the average cost of undergrounding electrical lines has decreased due to an Internal Revenue Service ruling concerning the 1986 Tax Reform Act. NDW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California that the unit amount (per linear foot) to be charged for fees in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead electrical lines shall be as follows depending upon when the effected utility lines were (are to be) undergrounded: Time Period 1986 and before 1987 1988 and after Unit Amount/LF S10o 6135 5128 Fees previously collected in excess of the above amounts shall be refunded to tha oavee in as expeditious a manner as feasible. If it is not possible to locate the payee, cne er,~e;3 f::^dt sti.tt he transferred to the City General Fund. The unit amounts for the other utilities shall remain at the current rates of 515.00 for Telephone and 510.00 for Cable TV, respectively. --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Duane Baker, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Zone 1 Flood Control District Funding of Local Projects RECONEND.ATION: Y City Council approve the resoiution supporting the Flood Control Project Priority list as approved by the City Engineers and the Zone 1 Advisory Committee. BACKGROUND: In October of 1981, the Zone 1 Advisory Committee approved and recommended to the Board of Supervisors a project priority list. This priority list was developed using cost-benefit formulas developed with the help and approval of the City Engineers from the cities within Zone 1: Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Upland, Chino, Montclair and Fontana. The priority list determined which project would have the greatest impact for decreasing potential flood hazards ooseA to rit:.a~s .~a ;rc;crt;, The priority list had the Ninth Street storm drain in Upland as the number one priority with our Hermosa Drainage System (Church to north of 19th Street) being the second project on the priority list. The goal of the list is to determine if and in what order projects will receive funding from Zone I after the Nest Cucamonga Creek project is completed. Supervisor Larry Walker has recently stated that he would like to see Zone 1 funds go to the project located in Chino first instead of to the project in Upland which was ranked first. The Chino project is an earthen channel near the Agricultural Preserve which ranked last in the priority list. By funding the lowest priority project first, the whole purpose of the priority list, to provide maximum flood protection with the money avaiiable, is lost. The plan was for the District to budget E525,000 this coming fiscal year to begin designs and plans on the Ninth Street drain. If this funding is lost, the Ninth Street project will be delayed and consequently District funding far portions of our Hermosa Drainage System will a1s0 be delayed. ICI CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ZDNE 1 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APRIL 6, 1988 PAGE 2 Both the cities of Ontario and Upland have passed resolutions opposing Supervisor Nalker's proposal and supporting the Ninth Street pro,Iect as the first priority for District funds. Respectful) pbmitted, i1 /~ ~ // ~, RHM:D Attachment ~~ -l RESOLUTION N0. H ~ ' r o I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMOMGq, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE ZONE I ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROJECT PRIORITY LIST WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga experiences considerable flooding and requires the construction of additional drainage facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Zone 1 gdvisory Committee has recommended to the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors a priority list which was agreed to by the City Engineer in Zone 1. WHEREAS, this priority list Nas intended to serve as the guide for building flood control Drojects in Zone I wfth Zone 1 funds. NON, THEREFORE, BE It RESOLYEB by the City Councfl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby supports the project priority itst as adopted by the Zone 1 Advisory Committee and calls upon the San 6ernardino County Board of Supervisors to do the same. i~. ,~~ RESOLUTION N0. 8H-~*U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COllNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANQ10 CU CAM7NGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING NEGOTIATIONS BHTWEEN THE COUNTIES OF SAN BERNARDINO AND RNERSIDE FOR USH UP RNERSIDE OJUNTY LANDFILL SITES AND ENCOURAGING THE FORMATION OF A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF MANAGING REGIONAL SOLID WASTE DI SPUSAL WHEREAS, solid waste management is the development and operation of refuse disposal systems designed to handle municipal refuse in a healthful, economic, and conserving manner; and, WHEREAS, available landfill sites for the disposal of solid waste have reached or will reach capacity in the near future in the County of San Bernardino and developable landfill sites in the Coun[y are scarce; end, WHEREAS, potential iandf ill sites and al iernative di eposal meth ode are being investigated; and, WHEREAS, potential landfill sites have been identified in Riverei de County; a County that currently prohibits the importation of solid waste from outside its boundaries. NOW. TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby supports negoti ati one between the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors and the Riverei de County Hoard of Supervisors fcr the use of the disposal of solid weer e; however, the City does not support the location of a haz a rdoue waste site in San Bernardino County to be used by Riverside County for hazardous waste di eposel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga encourages the formation of a Soint Pow ere Authority for the purpo ee of managing regional solid waste di aposal. ',\ --CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA a;- STAFF REPORT '<.,~ " DATE: T0: fROM: BY: SUBJECT April 6, 1988 ~. ..~ City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ~_ Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOIRENgATIQI: The required street improvements for OR 85-38 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the C1ty Cierk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 521,000. Background/Analysis DR 85-38 - located southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Seventh Street. DEVELOPER: Scheu and Scheu P.0. Box 250 Upland, CA 91785 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 527,000 Respectfull s fitted, _~~, RHM:S A?*_achment 11Z- RESOLUTION N0. S $ ~l g3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 85-36 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COhIPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of Dublic improvements for DR 85-38 have been completed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ (~3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager ~~. ~:f FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer gy; Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Insper~~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Coagletion pECOMENMTIpI: The required street isgroveaents for MDR 87-32 have been coagleted in an iagrovaeiaents~ authorizeithe City E gineer to file a Noticelof Coapletton and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perforwance and in the amount of 518,000. Background/Malysis MDR 87-32 - located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. DEVELOPER: frito Lay Inc. 7701 Lecacy Drive Plans, Texas 75U24 Release: Faithful Perforiaance Bond (Streetl 518,000 Respectfu 1 u ltted, ~~ / RHM: Rttarhalent X14 RESOLUTION N0. g d ~( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 87-32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public tagrovements for MDR 87-32 have been cowpleted to the sat7sfactton of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Coagletion is reQuiwd to be filed, certifying the work coaplete. NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that Lhe work 1s hereby accepted and the Ctty Enysneer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Co~pletlon with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. -+~. ,-s I'~TTV llC T Tll•Ti/1 !~ . DATE: T0: FROM: BY: April 6, 1988 STAFF REPORT City Council and City Manager „_~.. Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. 6111i1and, Public Norks Inspec•~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECDMIEMDATIOM: The required street improvements for DR 87-02 have been completed in an acceptable Wanner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the Ctty Engineer to file a Notice of Capletion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perfonwnce Bond to the amount of 515,000. Background/Malysis DR 87-02 - located at 9500 Santa Anita Avenue, north of 4th Street. DEVELOPER: 18 Santa Anita Partnership 515 South F1oNer Street #970 ~___,.._ rll anM1 wa v~y. , Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) SI5,000 Respec s bmltted, ~y AHM:S Attachment I I /o RESOLUTION N0. ~ 8 ~ ~ b J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON811, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-02 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK VIHEREAS, the construction of public leproveaients for DR 87-02 have been coapleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Co~pietion 1s required to be filed, certifying the work conplete. NOM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer Ts authorized to sign and file a Notice of Co~pletlon with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~--~ / 1 ~~ --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ STAFF REPORT '~`+~' DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspec ~~~ ~ SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMENDATIOM: The required street improvements far TR 11606 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it 1s recommended that City Councii accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 555,400 (Streets) and 58,400 (Storm Drain), authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds 1n the amount of 5554,000 (Streets) and f84,000 (Storm Drain). Background/Analysis TR iibOb -located on 19th Street betvreen Haven Avenue and Deer Creek. DEVELOPER: Glenfed Develo nt 1550: Y~rt..... ~,. .. Y,u UYICIOI U, .iUl li LUU Encino, Cailfornia 91436 Accept: Streets Storm Drain Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 355;460 38'~ Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5554,000 584,000 Respectful submitted, e/ _ ---. RHM:S~MB~SJm ~~ . Attachment J ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ - I SlS- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC I14ROVEMENTS FOR TR 11606 AND AUTHORIZING THE FLING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NOAK NHEREAS, the construction of public irprovesents for TR 11606 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Coagletion is required to be filed, certifying the work coaplete. NOM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work Ts hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and fife a Notice of Copletton with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. I AI- I~n - CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. 611111and, Public Norks Inspecta~~l~y SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONEIWTION: ~r The reQuired street improvements for Tract 12238 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of (46,540.00, authorize the Ctty Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release Lhe Faithful Performance Bond Tn the amount of fg65,400.00. Background/Analysts Tract 12238 - located on the northwest corner of Neuman Avenue and Church Street DEYELOPER: Citation Builders 17731 Irvine Bouievara, quite 20i Tustin, CA 92680 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f 46,540.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f465,400.00 Respectful fitted, ~ ~~.~~-r RHM:SMG:sd / Attachment X20 RESOLUTION N0. ~ 8 ^ ~ $~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON61, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IIFROVEMENTS FOR iRACT I2238 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF Cg4LE1I0N FOR THE NOPoC MHEREAS, the construction of public iagroveaients for Tract 12238 have been cowpleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Coagletlon 1s required to be filed, certifying the work coaplete. NOM, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coppletlon with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ia~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Resource Center Coordinator ~~..:. ~:; SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Passing on Reapportionment _Report Eor the Storm Drain Channel (Assessment District 86-2) Eor the Lot Line Ad iustment Eor APN 201-271-71, APN 201-271-72, and Tract Map 12873, giving Preliminary Approval, and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report Eor the Storm Drain Channel (Assessment District 86-21 for the Lot Line Adjustment Eor APN 201-271-71, APN 201-271-72, and Tract Map 12873, giving Preliminary Approval, and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988. EVALUATION: During fiscal year 1987/88 a property subdivision occurred within the Storm Drain Channel (Assessment District 86-2). This has necessitated the reapportionment of unpaid assessments on subdivided properties. The Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report preliminarily approves the Reapportionment Report and sets the time and place Eor the public Rearing for May 4, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. at the Lions Park Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Fespect~~f~~ully su^^bmitted, Robert A. Rizzo '~~ Assistant City Manager RAR:JBF:sgr Attachment: Resolution Passing on Reapportionment Report 122 RESOLUTION NO. '~ p ~I D V RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT FOR THE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-21 FOR THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR APN 201-271-71, APN 201-271-72, AND TRACT MAP 12873, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 4, 1988. WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously cor.f firmed sssessments in a special assessment district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said code, said special assessment district known and designated as Assessment District 86-2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District") and, WHEREAS, subsequent thereto, certain lots and/or parcels of land which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided; and this legislative body has ordered the preparation of and has now received a "Reapportionment Report" setting forth the segregation and apportionment of the unpaid installments of the original assessments, all as authorized by Pazt 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 specifically commencing with Section 8730 thereof; and, SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the report entitled "Reappor tlonment Report" setting forth certain segregations and apportionments of the unpaid installments of the original assessments for the Assessment District is hereby received, preliminarily approved and ordered to be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the legislative body. SECTION 3. That the proposed segregations and apportionments as set Eorth in the Reapportionment Report, are hereby approved in the amounts set Eorth and for the respective lots or parcels as set forth in said report. Reference is hereby made to said report for all particulars as it relates to the proposes segregations and reapportionments. 123 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION APN 201-271-71, 72 & TM 12873 April 6, 1988 Page 2 SECTION 4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH OF MAY 1988, AT THE HOUR OF 7:30 P,M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, LOCATED AT THE LIONS PARK COhII.fUNITY CENTER, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL TFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR THE HEARING UPON THE PROPOSED AMENDED ASSESSMENTS. ALL PERSONS INTEPESTED IN THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT OR IN THE LANDS AFFECTED THEREHY, OR IN THE BONDS SECURED THEREBY, MAY, AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING OR AT THE TIME TO WHICH THE HEARING MAY BE CONTINUED, APPEAR AND PROTEST AGAINST THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT. WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT ARE TO BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIME NOT LATER THAN THE TIME 5ET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECTION 5. ~ a~ ~,u --- CITY OF RANCHO CI;CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide ~ SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 12870 and DR 87-16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 41 and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988 RECOMIENDATIpI It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 41 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described proiects to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. AnalysislBackground Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City`s intent to annex Tract No. 12870 and DR 87-16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation 41 and setting the public Fna.i nn A~1^ t~~. Yyo .1 1000 ~1~~ ..hid a ^~p ~ ~, utt ~ VVYlryll bVIN 1UCI YLI UII 1> a resolution gluing preliminary approval~of thelEnglneer's Report for the subiect annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subiect annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respect pbmitted, ,~ RHM:J Attachments 125 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~ I o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROYAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 41 TO STREET LIGHTING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 MHEREAS, on Apr11 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Larhlscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer bas made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified 1n any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~~safd-work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and conf 1 rnmd. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land 1n said- sA sessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. Report forEtTlODurposesaofsall subsequentlproceedingschandipursuant to'the proposed district. ~ ab CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 41 for Tract No. 12870 and DR 87-16 SECTION i. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon ait lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Mork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on ma,ior streets (arterial and r<.r,~„ .gyn.....,.. streets) as shown on the Lighting Dl strict Alias Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit balls. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Div151on. Reference is hereby made to the sub,)ect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram far the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and speciflcatlons for street lighting Improvement on the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as 7f said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removai or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. ~~~ SECTION 4, Estimated Casts No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. A11 improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is tomprised of street light tmprovements on maJar streets for residentlai improvements (single family, multi-family, cendominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of ail industrial. compercial and institutional protects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, comaerclal and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp lamp Size* YTD No. 41 Total 5800E aea a4a 9500E 499 1 500 16,000E 16 0 16 22,000E 4 0 4 27.500E 17 0 17 *Nigh Pressure Sodium Yapor Total Total Annual lamp Size La s Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 448 X S 8.93 X 12 548,007.68 9500E 500 X 510.16 X 12 = 60,960.00 16,000E 16 X 512.08 X 12 2,319.36 22,000E 4 X 513.84 X 12 = 664.32 27,500 17 X 515.31 X 12 = 3,123.24 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost = 5115,074.56 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation = 16,816 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 = 68 Total Assessment Units 16,884 A 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost f115~074.5_5, f5.82/year/unit o. a n s n s rc Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Dlaaram Copies of the proposed Assesssent Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1`, Annexation No. 41. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of ggeneral benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shail be eQUal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resoiutian of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. pity Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the Ctty Council. 5, Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~ ~q EXHIBIT "A' Properties and 1a~proveax'nts to be inciuded within Annexation No. 24 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Zo_ ne 1 Pro ect Assess. No. of La s to be Annexed _~_ Acreage ~f- ~_ __ _a_ TR 12870 _ 57 4 1 T - - Zone 2 DR 87-16 .5 1 ~ ~ ~ 3b ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ~ ANNEXATION NO. 4/ N P i Y K _ t w w • N z 3 N , . w r IW w N w w • s • w . \ Y n ~ I ~ \ Y • 1/ N i. XICXLAHD qV NUF I 6ROUNDCOVER I• .ft.) I THE ES Iw.I STREET 23000 LEOENO (EliwaiMa Are) TRAIII]]S00 •0 ~ 6rowdcprb -"--~-- (SO. R'L) • Strgfliyht 5,~~, CITY OF RANCIiO CUCA1[ONOA w COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO , ~'""cam, o, '~" STATE OF CALIFORNIA A T fm .__ l~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 4 ~ FoafNILL BLVD YIELD ~ ~ I ~ R ~MpL'(I-fAMILV Q NgK1U6 CoMfLE% o~.n.ren~ ,..~. VM%11Nc ~' t~nio Nro~Aw ~%IbY GO%-~ UNLK4M' ~r ~ !LC[% LYK 1R/Y11YA11.f s 1 rRNA1E -__ ._ ___. y \ ~Fil ORM /IELO ARRoW NwY. ~,.fc~`~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA . ~~ = COUNT7! OF 8AN BERNARDINO n ~ BTATE OF CALII-ORNIA ~T Z o, „- t; s 1 ~I im RESOLUTION N0. S (j - t R ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. I, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGWITING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 41 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. OescrT Mon of Mork: That the puD11c interest and convenience requ re an~ft~s f e~inien~ion of this City Council to fonp a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described 1n Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to be located wiYfiin roadway r gg t-o -way enuaerated 1n the report of the City Engineer and more partlculariy described on maps which are on file 1n the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 41 to Street Irgn+r~C r°y iu Leila llLC U15 Lr1Ci NO. 1`. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated rro~ in the opinion of sa ty ounc is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district 15 assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Nap of Annexation No. 41 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" maps is on file 1n the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Re ort of En lneer: The City Council of said City by Resolutlon~Tias approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1" is on file 1n the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. 13~ SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be toilette ad t- tTie sane t ne an n t same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon sold report at their first regular meeting 1n June, at which tine assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Piece of Heari~nq: Notice is hereby given that on May 4,-1998; at the ur o pm n ~e City Council Chaabers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons having any ob,lections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause wiry said work should not be 4one or carried out or why Bald district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in whicA each signer thereof 1s interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will 6e considered. If the signer of any protest is not sham upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as Lhe owner of the property described 1n the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and L1 htln Act of 1972: A71 the work herein propose~s6a11 a ne an carr a rou n pursuance of an act of the )egislature of the State of California dealynoted the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Hlghwarys Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan to et on o t e ,nve.,.n.n_ _nA_ Twc wp; shah sign iris kesolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the soma, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in Th_e Da11Y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 134 -CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: Apr11 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: JuQy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SU&IECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 12870, located on the North side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, to Street Lighting Maintenance Oistrlct No. 2 as Mnexation No. 26 and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988 RECONEIOIITION It 1s recomaended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 26 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described tract to Street LTghting Maintenance District No. 2. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval 1s a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Trart Nn. 12R70 in~atpA nn the Nnrth e1AP of H1nhlanA Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation 26 and setting the public hearing date for May 4, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subSect annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the sub,iect annexation 1s on file in the Engineering Division. Resp submitted, RHM:~ Attachments RESOLUTION N0. Q 8-I 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO "UCAMON6A, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 26 TO STREET LIGHTING WIINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 WHEREAS, on Apr11 6, 1988, the City Council of the ftty of Rancho Cucamonga directed Lhe City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report Tn writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City En9lneer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to Lhis Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report'is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be aadified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as foilows: expenses oECsaON work and ofethegincidentaltexpenses 1n~conneetlonctherewith, contained 1n said report be, and each of then are hereby, prcilminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n sold report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. land fn saEC-i3 Assessmenta0lstrict/nsproportlonmto the estimatedibenefit t0 be received by said subdivision, respectlveiy, from sold work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for tTw~ purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursoant to the proposed district. 13~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 26 for Tract No. 12870 SECTION 1. Authors tv for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Div151on 15 of the Streets and Nighways Code, State of California (landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2, General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The Ctty Council has determined that Lhe street lights to be matntafned will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Nark to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting n!_..1~• a rgg Man vhlrh to nn file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cast shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications far street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram far the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the Tndivldual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached herein. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district Include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the 111uminatlon of Lhe su6~ect area. ~ 3"1 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs construction. wiA1161mprovementsowill be tconstructedmbyode~velopers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 1s shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enera Cost• No. of Lamps L_~ S1ze* YTO~s None26 Totaia~ 5800E 1264 2g 9500E q O 1292 4 *H1gh Pressure Sodium Yapor Total Total Annual La Size Lames Nate Mo's Ma1nt. Cost 5800E 1292 X i 8.93 X 1T 5138,450.72 9500E 4 X 510.16 X 12 = 48).68 Total Annual Mai nt. Cost = ~ggg'a0 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation = 4796 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 67 Total Assessment Units 4863 t3$ 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost 3138 = 528.57/year/unit o. o n s n s r c Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2', Annexation No. 26. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the Oistrict and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention t0 annex a District and sets public hearing date. d. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to forni a Oistrict or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. '~q EXHIBIT 'A" Properties and linproveeients to be included within Annexation Na. 26 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: Assess. No. of La s to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage -~_ Zone 1 TR 12870 - 67 28 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 2 h I ,. I -. w - --- Y ' w i R H M ~ w w I I~ I I I I~ I I V V I I I _i-1J MIGNLANU AV MlE I GROUNOCOVER (r ,ft.l I TREES IwJ LEGEND STREET 23.D00 40 (EtiwpnEa Arw.) ~-~d~pN TRAIL 37.300 =_S3o.wU • Stratlipht I :~~~ ~; .6'~ ~ ~3 Im ~~ _ pp< 6 w I ~ W w r w w I crr~r of aexcgo cuc~+~soxa~ COUNTY OF 8AN BEBIITAxDIxO BTATS of a~r.~oxx~ - N RESDLDTIDN N0. 0 ~ - I I,y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 26 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2; DURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Nighwa,ys Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Des~cri ti on off Nock: That the public interest and convenience regal-re an td 1 is the in n ton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described Tn Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation Includes Lhe cost and supervision of any iighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work 1s to be located w tl-Ti~dway rig -enumerated 1n the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled `Annexation No. 26 to Street Lighting maintenance urstrrct No. ['. SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated-vror in the opinion o sa y ounc 1s of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pdy the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 26 to Street Lighting Maintenance Oistrict No. 2" maps 15 on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Re ort of En sneer: The City Council of said Ctty by Resolution Ao~Fas approve t e report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled 'Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report 1s hereby made far all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ar~ SECTIDN 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collectedf aE fume t me an n same manner as County taxes arc collected. ilk City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their fiat regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the nett fiscal year will be deterwi~kd. SECTION 6. Tiak and Place of Hearin : Notice Ts hereby given that on May 4,-T988;~ the ur o pm n e 1ty Council Chaabers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho~CUCamonga, aqy and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, mqy appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or w10~ said district should not be foamed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be 1n writing and must contain a description of the property 1n which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of Sao Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer 1s the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsea in arM Li tin Act of 1972: A11 the work herein propose s all ne a carr a rou n purswnce of an act at the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be ma pursuan ect on a t v~rnrn_ .~..!~ T.".c !!;,•,•;,; shad ,iyn in is Keso~utton and the City Clerk shall ettest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sank to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at ieast once in The Dail~Re or~t, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On art 10, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 14~ n rrv nc o n win rtn n STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering aide ~,,. SUBJECT: Approval to Annex Tract No. 12870, located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, and Archibald Avenue Oateway Monuments, located at the northeast and northwest corners of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street, to Landscape Maintenance District Na. 1 as Annexation No. 44 and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988 RECOMIIENOATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 44 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described protects to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex Tract No. 12870, located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda gven:ie and East Avenue, and Archibald Avenue Gateway Monuments, located at the northeast and northwest corners of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Annexation No. 44 and setting the public hearing date for May 4, 1988. Also attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subtect annexation. Letters from the developers requesting the subtect annexation are on file in the Engineering Division. Respec f submitted, v RH11 SI~B...sd~ Attachments /~'4" RESOLUTION N0. ~~ -'93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 44 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 WHEREAS, on April 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o sa work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report he, and each of them are hereby, prel7minarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descr e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sai ssessment District in proportion to the estimated henefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. ~ `t''J CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 44 for Tract No. 12870 and Archibald Avenue Gateway Monuments SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requfrements of Article 4, Chapter 1 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract No. 12870 and Archibald Avenue Gateway Monuments as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subJect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4, Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and deveioped work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (E.30) cents per square foot per year, These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 including Annexation No. 44 1s as follows: Existing Annex New District No. 44 Total Landscape Area 920, i52 ii, 900 992,052 No. of D. U. 9,553 67 9,620 Per Lot Annual Assessment 992,052 X E .30 = 291,615.60 73 X E5.00 = 365.00 ?97;460:6Q E291,980.60 530.97 9,620 '~ Assessment 5ha11 apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Nhere the development covered by thfs annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced, SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A coDY of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A" by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Rct of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1, City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. ~. C,ty Council adopts Resolution of Intention to gnnex to Distrfct and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the Cfty Council conducts a public hearing and aDDroves, or modifies and approves the indf vidual assessments, l41 Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 44 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1; MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D/U TR Sg~ Ft• -S-F~~ 12870 67 Etiwanda Ave. --- 23,000 40 Trail 37,500 Archibald Ave. (NM & NEC) Gateway Monuments 4J 560 fii840 33 TOTAL 4,560 67,340 73 148 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO..Z ANNEXATION N0. < •. . w w I GROUNDCOVERbR fll I TREES IwJ IEGENO S'REET 23.000 ~0 lEtiwuMo Avw.) ~ GrounOtorwr So. WLI • Strptlipht TRAIL 3T 600 - _-I ``O~LC~t^ t CITY OF RAtiCHO CI,CA~1C ~~ =7~' z ENGINEERIYG DIVISION o~ ~'`~' -> VICINITY ~1AP tm N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. .Z ANNEXATION N0.44 f m ~~ T A ~ F1ftMWM IOf tYlOOCftdlq Ytl NwunwK ~ a u^ Clty of BIB rre.a •) a.e. , "~ ~ PO. e. q'4m n JtaeO .5.4 N BG".QN/!RO/NO A/C'NUE No•iiav7/aa. ~s 3sv~',"n'^,^ CITY OF RANCHO CL`CA~IONGA ,.- ~ ~ ' , ''V'~~a'~ "~ A4aJ11MEMiS tit "1'~' Z ENGINEERING DIVISION C'~ ~'~ > VICINITY b1~1P 11 im RESOLUTION N0. ~ p ~~9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1, An ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 44 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OGJECTI ONS THERETO NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTIp1 1. Description of Nork: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the n~tton of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Sect ton 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler <_ystem, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lightfng, structures, and walls in connection with said parkway, SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to be located w~i n-roadway ray and landscaping easwnrntc of i and,~.,.e ?ia f~iLeuarr~e uiscn a no. t enumerated in the report of the City Engi neerrand more particularly described on maps which are an file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "annexation No. 44 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1". SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contemplate wor in t e op n ono sa ty ounce is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and Lhe said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certafn "Map of Annexation Nn, 44 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1° heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City, 15~ RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution o. as approve a report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 44, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a~~ a same me an n t same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. TTme and Place of Nearin Notice is hereby given that on May 4,x'488, aE the lour o n tie City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, fn the City of Rancho~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any obJections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obJections will be considered. If the signer of any protest 1s not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain nr ho arrm",aniM ti„ written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972; All the work herein propose~Fall a one an came roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECT [ON 8. publication of Resolution of Intention: Published notice shall be made pursuan o ect on o e overnmen ode. the Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of On ar o, a arnia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal if arnia. ~ ~ T~ ~5 v DATE: T0: FROM: BY: - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 6, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer ,ludy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide »., C SUBJECT: ADProval to Annex DR 87-16, located east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Arrow Route, to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 18 and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988 RECDIMENd1TI0N It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 18 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described protect to landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 87-16, located east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Arrow R^^t~ t^ L'^C:c~^c N1';Yr,,:r~ta D. t. ;ct ..u. r .m Aunexaiiun no. iti ono Y setting the^ public hearing date for MdY 4, 1988. A15o attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the subJect annexation. A letter from the developer requesting the subJect annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. Resp 1 submitted, RG I~sd Attachments 153 RESOLUTION N0. ~ S ' 19 S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 18 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 WHEREAS, on April 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting pct of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECT [ON 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~ia work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily ayyl urea Glltl 6UIIFI Hoed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed, SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said- s~sment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work arld of the Incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed, SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for~>~poses of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. i54 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 18 for DR 87-16 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in Compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), SECTION 2, General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Pions and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineer ing Division. 4 pf cr anrp ;~ hprpby made to the subject development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas, The Duns ana specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4, Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demartateA into two zones. Zone 1 is comprfsed of Parcel Map 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project boundary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. 155 Zone 2 is comprised of all other pro,lects that are being annexed or will be annexed to this District. All lots or parcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other ma3 or divided highways and some parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation No. 18 is as follows. Zane 1 Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost f2,070 Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month f2~0~ = f258.76/year or f21.66/mo./lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 18 Total Total estimated annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 0 Assessment units, acres 380,631.5 .6 380,632 Total cost • assessment unit for year and month 0 x f.30 S96,Ti7'~ = f 0/year 0/mo./acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated Sn Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Otagr am A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled 'Exhibft A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated wf thin the text of this report. 15ly SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage for each lot or parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in ,tune, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through ass essmerts as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1912. SECTION 7, Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary gpproval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the DTStrict or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engfneer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in .lone, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. ~ 5'J Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 18 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE OR 87-16 .5 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION N0. I Area Sa. fit. Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 6th Street 0 i 58 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.3 ANNEXATION NO. 1D ~31TE /A~'fNILL 86V n~o ' t ~I~1UL11-rAMILY "~ Nalsus convLEX ~~~ r vwurlYS ~- X/2rylo NYORANf 'xueN eo% gy~tiy~y ' NOCN 4MLL `11tNYFCI~f PIWMC L- ._ ._ _. `` W oRlvl FlELv f I I ARROW NW. ,~i~~~'°°`^, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,`IONGA w I~_Rb'I-lf~ F~ ;z ENGINEERING DIVISION w T ~~ ~ VICINITY MAP 1\,II Im RESOLUTION N0. 8~ - ~ I tp A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 18 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1912 .AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Dursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION ]. Descri lion of Mork: That the public interest and convenience require an s e n en ion of this Ctty Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those parkways and faciliites thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed ar recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, and walls in connection with said parkways. SECTION Z. Location of Work: The foregoing described work is to be located w tt i~roadway rig t-o -way and landscaping easements of iandcnann Maintenance District No. 3 enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on fife in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. IB to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3". SECTION 3. Description of Assessment District: That the contemplated worcT, in the opinion of said ty ouZ nci'~ is of more than lotai or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. la to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3" heretofore approved by the City Council of said City by Resolution No. *, indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. loo RESOLUTION PAGE 2 SECTION 4. ReDOrt of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution N~Fas apDrov~t of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proDOSed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Annexation No. 18, Landscape Maintenance District No. 3' is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for ail particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5. Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be collected a[ t~ same t me an n t same manner as County taxes are collected, The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in ,tune, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTION 6. Time and Place of Hearing: Notice is hereby given that on May 4,-I982~f the our o n e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any obJections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be 1n writ{ng and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or ob,lections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the Drotests, then such protest must contain ar be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTION 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propose sTiall a one an carr e t roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Rct of 1912, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. Publication of Resolution o. Intention: Published notice shall be ma- ea pursuan o ec on o e overnmen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontar o, a ornta, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~~ I~ I rimv no o ~ wi r~„~ n STAFF ItEPOBT oarE: apr;l 6, 19ea T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide ~1 CYO SUBJECT: Approval to Annex DR 87-16, located east of Et iwanda Avenue, north of Arrow Route, to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 14 and setting the date of public hearing for May 4, 1988 RECOMIENDIITION It is recommended that Cfty Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 14 and setting the date of public hearing regarding the City's intention to annex the above described project to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. Analysis/Background Attached for City Council approval is a resolution declaring the City's intent to annex DR 87-16, located east of Ettwanda Avenue, north of Arrow nvuLc, tG $a igh r.y 'i- - - nt_t_r_t u.. ~ n.. ~t i,. 1A nA setting the public hearing date~for yMay 4, 1988. --Also-.attached for Council consideration is a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report for the sub,jett annexation, A letter from the developer requesting the sub,lect annexation is on file in the Engineering Division. Respectfully- ubmitted, / !_~ RHM: JM. Attachments Ib2 RESOLUTION N0. $~S'~9/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION N0. 14 TO STREET LIGHT IN6 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 WHEREAS, on April 6, 1968, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and NHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses o~~~pork and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2; That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri e n said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby prelimf nari ly approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in sai ssessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4; That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Report for Y~ purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. I ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 14 for DR 87-16 SECTi ON 1. Authority for Report This report is in Compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cal ifernia (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972), SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on Lhe lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established 6y the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local streets as shown on the Lighting n;g«r;rr alt ac Mao which is on file with the City Engineer. improvement maintenance is considered of general benerlt so all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,lect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were 3tt 3rhed hP.r ete. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area, i e4 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. A71 improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for industrial, commercial and institutional improvements throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District Na. 6 is shown helow: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No.14 Total SBOOL 47 --- 47 9500E 2 --- 2 *High Pressure Sodium Vapar Total Total Annual Lalllp dlLe Ldll ! M1Y LC' I•IU ] MOIII L. UUi1. 5800E 47 X S 8.93 X 12 = 55,036.52 9500E 2 X 510.16 X 12 243.84 Total Annual Maint. Cast E5,280. 36 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation = 438.5 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 1.0 Total Assessment Units 439.5 ~~~ 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost ES 280.36 = E12.01/year/unit No. o n s n s r ct Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", Annexation No. 14. These diagrams are hereby Tncorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Mhen units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts ResolutTan of Prellmtnary Approval ~f City Engineer's Report. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District znd sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts publTC hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies anC approves the individual assessments. 6~ EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to 6e included within Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. No. of Lam s to be Annexed Pro ect Acreage U~- L L L L DR 67-I6 ,5 1 -__ ___ ___ ___ ___ (~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.6 ANNEXATION NO. 14 SITE PuyfNI1,L ~E1.0 ~ ~ ,~ pMIfIIM 'M1NY !OX aocK u+u~~ GELD ~. ~ ~. g1N~4M `~ 3 F ~~ AflICOW NWV. ~MUL'fl-/AMITY HOU61{Ifi COMPLEX IIIpRANY FlffJkfE O "~' M CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONOA ~ DR87--!(n ..,_; '~\~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDIIIiO Z. c;.'"~ e; `~'~ . STATE OF CAI.II~ORNIA - N a 6 +, Im RESOLUTION N0. 0 ~ '~ G A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIR DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION N0. 14 TO STREET LIGHTING t41AINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING 08JECTI0.N5 THERETO NON, THEREFORE 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Ac*_ of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as follows: SECTION 1. Descri tion of Work: That the public interest and convenience~e an t s e n en ion of this City Council to form a maintenance district in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the maintenance and operation of those street lights the boundaries of the proposed maintenance district described in Section 2 hereof. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of any lighting and related facilities in connection with said district. SECTION 2. Location of Nork: The foregoing described work is to be located wit iTfi'n roadway r g t-o -way enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting diaiuLamuC< Diau iLL ii u. ~°. SECTION 3. Descri tion of Assessment District: That the contempla e~oT in a op n ono sa y ounc is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" maps is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. SECTION 4. Report of Engineer: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. * Fas approve t~T report of the engineer of work which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, titled "Engineer's Report, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made far ail particulars far the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. ~ c~9 RESDLUTIDN PAGE 2 SECTIpI 5, Collection of Assessments: The assessment shall be toilette a e same me an n e same manner as County taxes are collected. The City Engineer shall file a report annually with the City Council of said City and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the next fiscal year will be determined. SECTtpI 6. Time and Plate of Hearin Notice is hereby given that on May 4,ZDBB, at the tour o pm n e City Council Chambers at 9161 Base Line, in the City of Rancho~Cucamonga, any and all persons having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be done ar carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufflcfent to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protest must contain or be accanganied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. SECTIgI 7. Landsca in and Li htin Act of 1972: All the work herein propos"~sTiall a one an Carr a roug n pursuance of an act of the legislature o' the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and HTghways Code of the State of California. crrrrnn n m.,..,....._ - ~. wu u~ ne~uiuLion or intention: Published notice shall be ma~ursuant~yo ect on o e vermnen ode. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Da11y Report, a newspaper of general circulation publ7shed in the City of On ar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Cfty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Barrye R. Nansan, Senior Civii Engineer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF .PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION APPROVING TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE -TR1fC7 N - cus om o res en a su v s on o o s on approximately 85 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (iess than two dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Channel (Deer Canyon Drive) - APN 201-121-24 RECOMENUATIpI Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the May 4, 1988 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND At the Plannfng Commission meeting of March 9, 1988, a time extension to February 12, 1989, was approved for Tentative Tract 12332. This action has been appealed to the City Council, and as such requires that a public hearing be set and held within 30 days after the date of filing of the appeal. To allow for publication and mailing of Notices of Hearing, a public hearing should be scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of May 4, 1988. Respectful uhmitted, r RHM: BRF~i d l w Attachment ~~~ ~ 1 i ~.: (t:,' ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM ..~~,: 6uY OF RAflOHO CUC4MONGA ENCINEERiNG GIVi$IGN DATE: March 30, 1988 T0: C1ty Clark FROM: Pawls Mright, CouncilNeber ~ !~ SUB.IECT: TIME E%TENSIOM FOR TENTATIVE TNACT 12332 - CRISTIAMO I hereby appeal tM dectslon of the Planning Co~lsslon to grant a t/w extanslon for TenUtiw Tract 12332. Tba masons for sly appeal an the sack of adagwq secondary access and street design in the protect. Please schedule tbls stela for ttfy Council revlaw. PM:kck cc: City Council C1ty Manaeer Planning Lolwlssion Brad Buller Russell Maguire l~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: gpril 6, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87-18 - NCME FEDERAL - The appeal of the Planning amm ss on s ec s on eny ng a request to allow the sign copy to include the word "ANYTIMETELLER" on two (2) new faces of existing wall signs, la:ated at 9596 Base Line Road. 197 I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council eny a appea . II. BACKGROUND: At the regular meeting of February 10, 1988, the Planning >:ammission conducted a hearing on the Yariance application. At that meeting, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed signs did not conform to the criteria of the Sign Ordinance and denied the request. The Sign Ordinance discourages extraneous information and the word "ANYTIMETELLER" was determined to be extraneous information as it advertises a service the bank provides, rather than simply serving as a hue{n"ee idnMlFT rot•T nn III. ANALYSIS: The Sign Ordinance states "Sign copy shall include minimal, n otma ion only. The use of subordinate information such as telephone numbers, lists of products, pictures of products, etc. are discouraged. The name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign". The Planning Commission's interpretation is that the word "ANYTIMETELLER" constitutes extraneous information and, therefore, could not support the Variance. The Planning Commission aiso stated that allowing this sign will set a precedent for all banking facilities in the City. The applicant's reason for requesting a variance to allow the word "ANYTIMETELLER" is to identify a service the bank provides, because not all Hame Federal locations have automatic teller machines. The applicant ,: nn tends that, the City has allowed this type of sign in the past. In order to grant a variance, it must be shown that extraordinary circumstances exist on the site which clearly distingushes 1t frmn other property and validate the need for a variance, and thus, the inclusion of extranenous information. IV. STAFF COMMENTS: On rare occasions in the past, staff has allowed the us nevi ss name to include a list of products. This is based on the interpretation that a nationally registered tradenbrk could be considered as the name of the business. Such is the case with Sizzler (Steak, C~ CA Np ~~~ \ ID i^ y' ~A F' ~ 12 D I'73 Seafood, Salad), Alpha Beta (Liquor), Thrifty (Liquor), and Music Plus (Compact Discs and Yldeos). The Sizzler, Alpha Beta, and Thrifty signs were approved either prior to the incorporation of the City or prior to the adoption of the Sign Ordinance. In the case of the Music Plus sign, Music P1 us was considered a maior anchor tenant of the shopping center and, "Compact Di us and Ytdeos" is a nationally registered trademark. Mith Kane Federal, "ANYTIMETELLER' maY be a registered trademark. but they are not a maior anchor tenant of the center. Copies of the February Planning Couuisslon staff report and minutes are included in this report your review. Respect~llY su itted, B d B ery`t/~. City anne BB:TG:,1s Attachments: Appeal Letter, February 19, 1988 Planning Ccamission Minutes, February 10, 1988 Planning Commission Staff Report and ,n ,eoo 8e501 nL100 UT UClllai, .'cui u6if ,.., -74 8neegreted ... ~ "e vrcuM conxwvvicemwa Cpmpe~ry" February 19, 1988 Ms. Beverly Authelet City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Variance 67-18 Nome Federal Dear Ma. Authelet, WEC~Bb~C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ADMINISTRF7ION FEB 221988 7~t~1~~1~C~4~' IB Qiee.e.veGR X146, °°- Q.Qn~fL-- 6. a..~a...P..s Please accepC this letter and the enclosed check in the amount of $126.00 as our cequesC to appeal the planning commission decision on variance 87-18 -- Home Federal. we feel our request is consistant with the ordinance and the surrounding environment and provides a service to the community. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (619) 562-4200. Sincerely, ~- G Cult A. eaue[ Account Executive CAB/dmd enclosure I /~ . ~n5-o r.~:..i i.. '_. .q 6oE~:n_agc~,o926?' ~29539a '.• AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the resolutions would be brought back to the 2/24/88 meeting as Consent Calendar iteos. x < r t + --carried H. VARIANCE 87-18 - NOME FEDERAL - A request to allow the sign copy to nc u e e wor s y •e a ler" on two (2) new faces of existing wall signs, located at 9596 Base Line Road. Toy Gralm, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Vice Chainwn Chittea opened the public hearing. Mr. Curt A. Bauer, 10845 Nheatlands Avenue, Santee, representing the applicant, addressed the issue of design of the sign and stated this is a registered trade ark. Me painted out that the sign ordinance states that signs are for "public convenience' aM gust be "co~patlble with adjacent land uses'. Mr. Bauer cited exaaples of other businesses with signs with supporting information on thew within the City. Conwissioner Chittea questioned 1f the sign was visible to traffic. Mr. Bauer resDanse the slan 1s visible only rn wer tin~~"e r..aa~ ,..e not readable fray east bound traffic. ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ Vice Chainsan Chittea closed the public hearing. Conwissioner Blakesley stated he would not support the variance for the sign and upholds the sign ordinance of the City. Coawlssioner Emerick agreed with Ca~issioner Blakesley. Coaaaissioner Tolstoy concurred stating he did nat want to set a precedence. Vice Chatr~aan Chittea stated that the signs Mr. Bauer referred to were signs that pre-date the Sign ordinance and pre-date the incorporation of the City. These are the rery signs the Coamission is trying to discourage. Vice Chairman Chittea stated she strongly supports the current sign ordinance of the City. Comafssioner Tolstoy moved to approve the denial of the variance, Comaissioner Blakesley seconded the ~aotlon, Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Conwi55ion Minutes -7- r--~//~ February 10, 1988 / {O AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL • • * ~ r --carried MEY BUSINESS I. ENYIRON! development facility totaling 56,923 square feet on 4.88 acres of land in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Center Avenue - APN: 210-381-9, 30, 11 and 210-391-16, 17, 18. Chris Nestman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report aM advised the Cowission of a error on the resolution. Mr. lkstman stated that on Condition 1 under Dlannfng Division, the word "incompleted" should be "incorporated'. Vice Chairman Chitiea opened the public hearing. Mr. Adrian Young, Vice President of Delmar Enterprises, 8115 Rosebud clarified that the owner of the adjacent parcel is not the same ownership as the parcel in question. Mr. Young also addressed the request for the dedication stating that it is not consistent with the past development in the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park mr r~~~,,,, aeYnA for the consideration of conslstency.~ He also addressed the issue of in-lieu fees stating that none of the poles on Fourth SLrcet are coming down. Mr. Young indicated they weld rather pay the in-lieu fees rather than underground. The Dasis far the in-lieu fees is for the length of the property being developed from property line to property line. The property to question is 250 feet wide, and the center tine of the adjacent street, which 1s Center Avenue, is 25 feet, which is a total of 215 feet. The basis for the reasonableness in allowing in-11eu fees to a developer is less than 300 feet and not underground adjacent. They are neither 300 feet nor adjacent. He requested the Coawission consider the requirement of undergrounding. Yice Chairman Chitiea closed the publTC hearing. Yice Chairman Chitiea clarified there are two issues to be discussed, the undergrounding condition and the right-of-way width standards. Commissioner Emerick stated he would support undergrounding and not in- lieu fees. Ne questioned Engineering why they rc requiring undergrounding and not the fee since it is under 300 feet. Planning Commission Minutes -8- ~ /~ February 10, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 10, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner ~ ~~cn.uol, r` 9 `I _W A Z 19'~ SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87-18 - HOME FEDERAL - A request to allow the s gn copy Inc u e e wor s "ANYTIMETELLER' on two (2) new faces of existing wall signs, located at 9596 Base Line Road. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant submitted a Sign Permit Application to replace the copy of trro existing wall signs on Lhe Home Federal building. Based upon prevtdus decisions denying the placement of automatic teller wall signs, staff did not accept the application. The applicant has subsequently requested a Variance from the Sfgn Ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission to allow the placement of these two signs. II. ANALYSIS: In reviewing the two proposed "ANYTIMETELLER" signs for Rime~~ral, staff informed the applicant that per the City of nonciw Cucamonga ~Ign urdinance the use of subordinate information, essentially advertising a service or product in conJunction with a business identification, is discouraged. The name of the use or business shall be the dominant message on the sign. The Sign Ordinance does contain provisions for alternative signage, these being "convenience" and "directional" signs. Convenience signs contain such words as "Restrooms", "No Parking", "Entrance" or minor business identification far on-site directional purposes, while directional signs contain such worms as "Enter" "Exit", "One Way" or other symbols for the purpose of indicating on-site traffic directions. There are no limitations fn terms of die number and type of these signs, but signs that contain advertising, or products, shall not 6e considered a convenience sign, and directional signs shall not contain any advertisiny or ¢radename information. Neither sign may be larger than four square feet and na more than four feet in height, In consideration of the request fora sign variance staff suyyested the applicant use a convenience sign as a viable alternative to the wall sign, primarily because this type of sign could permit the requested information. The applicant felt this type of signage would not be adequate and requested to proceed wftn the Yariance. ~~ PLANNING COIMISSION STAFF REPORT VA 87-18 - Hame Fe al February 10, 1988 Page 2 III. PRECEDENT: Three previous appeals before the Planning Commmission sew precedent far tonight's decision. A71 three appeals were requests to allow extraneous informational wall signs and all three were subsequently denied. 1) In August, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed an appeal from the Lucky Store in the Haven Village Shopping Center, to allow for an extraneous informational wall sign of 'Deli, Liquor, Bakery". The Planning Co~1551on upheld the City Planner's decision and denied the appeal. 2) In November, 1986, the Planning Co~isslon reviewed an appeal of sign Permit 86-46 - Bank of America to allow the placement of two "Yersateller' wall signs. The Planning Com~isston upheld the City Planner's decision and denied the appeal. The reasons for denial included the nwber of existing signs and the size of the proposed wall signs. The Planning Camwlssion chose not to pursue an alternative type of sign. It was the decision of the Planning Commission that this sign would constitute advertising and there was a clear indication that the automatic teller would be visible from the street, as is the case with the Home Federal "ANYTIMETELLER'. ~i in aanuary, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed an appeal from The Wherehouse in the Cucamonga Village Shopping Center to allow for extraneous informational wall sign of "music, video and software". The Planning Commission upheld the City Planner's decision and denied the appeal. The Planning Commission's decision will once again ctarffy this provision of the Sign Ordinance for both existing banking facilities and future development, in that, approval of these wall siyns, as proposed, would set precedent for all banking facilities in the City. iV, OPTIONS: The following options are provided for consideration by t e anning Commission: 1) Deny the Sign Variance as inconsistent with the intent of the Sign Ordinance and the Alpha Beta Center Uniform Sign Program. 2) Direct the applicant and staff to work together to formulate an alternative to the proposed sign that would satisfy the request of the aQpplicant, but would also be I ~ 1 PLANNING CdMISSIOr TAFF REPORT VA 87-18 - Home Feo_ al February 10, 1988 Page 3 consistent with the provisions of the Sign Ordinance and the Alpha Beta Center. A possible solution is a wall mounted convenience sign with 2 to 3 Tnch letters to be viewed on-site for the purpose of directing customers Lo the "AN4TIIRETELLER". This would be the approval of the sign facing the parking lot, as the other sign faces Base Line Road. 3) The Dlanning Coawisslon also has the option of apDroving Variance 87-18 as requested. However, the mandatory findings outitned in the attached Resolution would have to be made prior to approval. V. RECOMM TION: Staff recoa~nends e ar nce rough the adoption '1 espe~Drully su ;Led, /a~(J~(J/'~, / Brad Bu ler ,'~ City Planner that the planning Commission deny of the attached Resolution. BB:TG:vc nL Ca~iunencs: Letter Or Appeal Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations (Showing proposed Signs) Exhibit "D" - Photographs Exhibit "E" - Locations of Resolution of Denial Automatic Teller Machines ~~~ a~~~ ~, .e~~~~~~ YARIANCB APPLICATIOtl HOME FEDERAL 9596 BASELINB WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION 1) ANYTIMETELLER is pact of Nome Federal's corporate identity program, and in addition, is a registered tcadsmar k. 2) Provides customer service to inform cardholders that there is an ATM machine on the premises available. This is important as not all Home Federal branches have ANYTIMBTELL ER machines. In this sense, the aignage is informational and directional in nature. ~OBa~ WNEATLANOS AVE. 6uiTE O, S! NT IE, rgUFORNIA 920]1 ~6~91 562 4200 ~ M Mc-~" M M\M 1 LM _ M Lr - - ~ rH :_ f ~ LM LM i~ p y u. ~ i. :;~;~' L, u a ' 4 LM i ... - ,act:. r _ ~.1~. T~ _ l 1~'I ~F' ~ wirt~ V V VOR'fH CI~ ~ ITE.~t: yk U? - ~~J R.-~.~~ CL,~~'~it~ TITLE: I,Q'LA'lOhl Mai PLA.titi1,VG D!~'LSIOfY iB,Z EXHIBIT ~_ SGaLE ~__ i ~__ ~ x~ i ~ ~Z ~~ _~~ ~~ ~ - ~ x ~~~ ~_ ~ ~~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~_~ j ---- ~ -~~ ~ I -~~ yR iV ~~ L `/ O O ~, ~~,ti'C A ~I VONTH CITY OF ITE~1: _~~- ''1~'~' TfTLE: "~ +~ P[.A.V:VI'VG DiVLS7gY i 8~z EXHIBIT!, SGaLE: I, ~ -. f $~ a~~ ~~~ k~ Fp`p #yF ~~ 1 I I ~~ Ca ,~I ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ -- ,; r ~ ~( ~_ L ~ z ,~~ ~~~~ Rt1.~~ CLCt~~it~ ~t.a~v;~rvc ~~~~ I ~4- ITE~b VA- ~G`~' ~ ~' TITLE ~'~~'k1'1C1.1~ EXHIBIT `~ ~ SGaLE: '(. C , I'~ ~ I : 1 VgtTH CITY OF R.~.tiCHO CL'G1ti10N(~ ~[a.~v~lrvc av~o~v 195 ITE.~1: _ Y~ ~~r ~~ TITLE ~i~.fi1l4~IGW~ EXHIBIT L2 SGLE .T << _; u .. a° c O ~`~~~ C~ RA:tiCI-i0 CLK:~.tiIC?tiC;~1 PI.Atiti1;~:C; Di~'LSl01~' ~ ~~ ITE1U ~ ' ~~ rrrLE: o ~ ~ ~_____ E`(FIIk3fT ~L SG\LE __ I J = I '~ = J `~ ~ ~---- u 1 t' I NI •1 all ~. 4. ~ ~ ~. L.~ AMMN! ~NNLYlNC! ., YI ~ ~ • ~~ 3 SAN ~-_~_-_ sur 1 v ~(~i'H C[TY C~ ITEb1: ~~t4 U~' Rr1.1iCH0 CL'C.-~~101\GA TITLE ATM ~,~( ~-11nt` 6, PI.AI~iN1~fG Dll'LSIOfY ~ 87 EXHIBIT ~_ SGLE: ~ ': c '. AuIOMAnc mLEx LacAnoNs 1. Paapna FTust Federal Savings 8 Loan, NNC of Base Line d Archibald 2. Nose Federal, N/S of Base L1ne, Mest of Archibald 3. Security Pacific Bank, N/S of Base Line, Nest of Archibald 4. Foothill Independent Bank, SEC of Base L1ne 8 Archibald 5. 1st Trust Bank, NEC of 19th a Rrchibald 6. Great Nestern Bank, NEC of 19th 6 Carnelian 7. First Interstate Bank, SEC of 19th b Carnelian 8. Bank of Aserlca, NEC of Base L1ne d Carnelian 9. Vineyard National Bank, NMC of Footh111 d Klusman 10. Bank of Aserica, SEC of Foothill d Archibald 11. Neils Fargo Bank, SEC of Footh111 8 Haven 12. Independence Bank, NEC of 6th d Haven ~D~ RESOLUTION N0. 88-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE N0. 87-18 TO ALLOW THE SIGN COPY TO INCLUDE THE NORD 'ANYTIMETELLER' ON TWO (2) NEN FACES OF EXISTING MALL SIGNS LOCATED AT 9596 BASE LINE ROAD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMIERCIAL DISTRICT A. Recitals, issuance (af then Variance SNo~ 875 18 aass described in thelititlen oforthis Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subiect Variance request is referred to as "the application", (11) On February 10, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. R. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts «r fnMh s„ .wc Rcc. t,._ "~t A uI L1i1a neaoiucion are true and Correct, 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 10, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with pu611c testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) fie application applies to property located at 9596 Base Line Road; and (D) The application proposes two sign faces with the words "HOME FEDERAL/ANYTIMETELLER" located (one each) on the south elevation and east elevation; and (c) The two signs are located approximytely fifty-five (55) feet from Base Ltnc Road; and information only The use o9rsubordinate tnforn~ttoo y adverttsingda service or product in con,function with a business identification, is discouraged. The name of the use ar business shall be the dominant message an the sign", ~OI PLAINIIN6 COIMISSlON RESOLUTION N0. VA 87-18 - Hose Federal February 10, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Coawission hereby finds and concludes that the following mandatory findings necessary to approve a Variance CAN NOT be made: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the ob,{ectives of the Sign Ordinance. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally W other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enloyed by the owners of other properties Tn the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified ,_ n, Lhc >an,c uiiu i~L. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Coaaission hereby denies the application suDJect to each and every condition set forth below. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Coawisston shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. l~0 PLANNING CgMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VA 87-18 - Name Federal February 10, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Pianntng Cemmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co~nlssion held on the 10th day of February, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL 191 - CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Cauncll FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Nestman, Assistant Planner 1977 SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE FOR TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND ELM AVENUE ar w an ast TeroraosVista Parkwny a es erra s a aY qy, and to designate Nest Elm Avenue for a special arterial and a collector street respectively within the Terra Vista Planned Community. I. RECpMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City ounc approve the street name changes as described above. II. BACKGROUND: The Council reviewed the street name changes on March T6-I988-and requested options be discussed far the proposal of West Elm Avenue and that the item return to Council for consideration. i1f. ANAI YSI C• A. Terra Vis~ta~~Parkway: At the last meeting, the City Council concurred witF -f~ Planning Camatssion recommendation to designate Nest Terra Vista Parkway and East Terra Vista Parkway with Milliken Avenue being the dividing point. Staff would recommend that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the name change. B. Elm Avenue: The following options are presented for the oun~c Trs consideration: 1. ti on 1 - Maintain Elm Avenue from Foothill over to pruce venue. Nest of Spruce, rename to Nest Elm Avenue (see Exhibit "A"). This option would maintain the integrity of Elm Avenue as it crosses Foothill consistent with street naming policy for streets which are continuous to be extended. Further, by simply adding a "Nest" prefix, there would be minimal confusion for drivers. Confusion could result for drivers expecting to be on "West Elm Avenue" when the street curves towards the west ,just past Church Street. GJGMO'yC ~' ~ ter. < > ~I i~ F'li ~ Z U,._ I> 19 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STR. NPME CHANGE - TERRA VISTA PKNY/ELM AVE April 6, 1988 Page 2 2. tion 2 - Maintain Elm Avenue from Foothill to Spruce. different~such~asi"Greenway Drive" (see ExhibTtc"BRjetely This option attempts to resolve confusion by making a stronger break in the name for that portion of street west of Spruce. "GreenwAy" 1s suggested because the ma,)or Greenw~y Trail runs along the entire frontage to the north parkway - a unique condition within Terra V1 sta. Other names cold be used such as historic names recawaended by the Historic Preservation Commission (see Exhibit "E"). 3. ti on 3 -Maintain Elm Avenue between Foothill and Church 3 ref; provide a new name between Church Street and Spruce, and provide a third name west of Spruce (see Exhibit "C"). The portion of the street between Church and Spruce is an irregular street which changes direction several times. This option would be consistent with street naming policy to name Irregular streets with the suffix "May . The disadvantage of this option 1s that the driver would experience three different street names within 3/4 of a mile. 4. Option 4 - Chana_e the name rhnrn thn ..."e. ~....- .- .~_ wes~~st north of Church Street (see Exhibit "~").~~ ,»~~ Because Elm Avenue exists south of Foothill Boulevard staff felt Tt was important to maintain the Elm Avenue designation for that portion of the street that runs from Foothill Boulevard north to Church Street and south into the Cucamonga Business Park thereby maintaining the Foothill and Elm intersection. However, as one proceeds north on Elm Avenue from Church the street makes a turn to the west and generally continues in an east-west orientation. This would be an appropriate place to change the street name because of the following reasons: 1. From this point addresses could be given on the east/west grid. 2. it would eliminate double intersections on Church Street. 3. It would not create an intersection with different names across from each other. 4. It would be consistent with street naming policy to change names where a street changes direction. ~q3 CI1T COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STR. NAME CHANGE - TERRA YISTA PKNY/ELM AYE April 6, 1988 Page 3 Confusion could however be created for motorists when the name changes at the curve. Other variations are possible, but these represent the primary options that may be considered. IY. PROCEDURE: Should the Lounctl approve the Nest Elm Avenue street name as originally recoeaended by the Planning Caeiission, a Resolution 15 attached. If the Council deteriaines that an option other than what has been recommended by the Planning Coawission 1s more appropriate, the item must be readvertised for Planning Commission public hearing and be brought back to the Council for final adoption advises the City Attorney. Resp ly s b te~ ~L Br City anrer BB:CN:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Option 1 Exhibit "B" - Option 2 exhibit "G" - Options Exhibit "D" - Option 4 Exhibit "E' - Historic Names City Council Staff Report from March 16, 1988 with Attachments and Exhibits q ~- gas d~'N1~1' ~/~ ~I~~/ J ~~ LM ~,' M M ;~ M .kH ~~ t'~~~~J~1C H ~~~ a ,,` , CC UP C M LM MH ,P E MH M M OP NFC. NC l.M f 1 r ~! M RC 1 I P i/~I I ~V F/ ~~~ LM LM P r' i+ MM ~~ Iq7 ~~lr'Gr WAY ~ AvEN~ 9 S ~N~ ~ifl ~ i~eyww utluut nuwua t.yuu. i...~.~ COC.IgR(i. a..ccl. a.rcw• al.hoy R~r. ao.11L. Mln.e C..p.n.ll. Moblaq.r• Ca0.11L M.bltr C6.Op.1 NroR ~O° rlon..r CLeR reust~..w• Caep.r• a.la.• C...tY R.oy O.M.e a.nGl.Clto• M ..Or.g10 a.rr.ne arp aMry rata ShaiUdl}('~ rr.Ntlle atlU M... a.n4q Or.ee atwM• ark.t ~~• a.tbon• 1b... 1i°°° 214.ralo LU JaOn.on Rlnc.ld• •priw.rv consldrr.elon I~ _I ~~~~-~~M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 16, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRDM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE FOR TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND ELM AVENUE - LEWIS H MES - A proposal to designate Nest Terra Vista Parkway and East Terra Vista Parkway, and to designate Nest Elm Avenue for a special arterial and a collector street respectively within the Terra Yista Planned Community. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commissions recommends that the City Co unc--i3 approve the street name changes. Ii. BACKGROUND: The reason for street name changes is to eliminate dou6Teintersec Lions with the same street names in two locations (see Exhibit "A"). The locations are for Terra Vista Parkway and rn~~rch Street and Elm Street and Church Street. Part of the original request was to put an "East" and "west` designation at the end of Terra Vista Parkway to establish two separate streets bisected by Milliken. This format was preferred by the Sheriff's Department and the Fire District because they felt that the trailing deli gnati on•would emphasize "East" and "West" and make the street easier to find on an index list. Neither agency, however, was absolute an the designation. I[i. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearin~' g Yo review the request on February 24, 1988. The recommendation of the Planning Commission is to put the "East" and "West" at the beginning of Terra Yista Parkway because their feeling is that the directional designation will have a greater i mcact as a prefix (see attached February 24, 1988 minutes). The second part of the street name change req~~est is to rename a portion of Elm Street west of Spruce to "West Elm Street." the Planning Commission supports the request as submitted. ~0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET NAME CHANGE - LEN[6 HOMES March 16, 1988 page 2 IV. PROCEDURE: Upon receiving testimony at this public hearing, the ou~hall announce its decision on the proposed street name changes by Resolution. The Council may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the street name changes pursuant to the requi red findings. [f approved, the Resolution shall include the date upon which said changes will become effective. This decisT on shall be final. Sixty (60) days prior to the effective date of change, the City Clerk shall send written notice of the change to the Post Office, County Recorder, Fire District, and Sheriff's Department. V. FINDINGS: Before ap proof ng a street name change, the Council must make the following findings: A. That the proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan. B. That the proposed change is consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Streets and Highways or adopted Circulation Element. C. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment. D. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the public health. safet.v. rnmfn rt convenience, and general welfare. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hea ring in The Dai~~e o~rt newspaper and notices were posted along the affected streets and within affected apartment complexes. No correspondence has been received to date for or against the name changes. a was no public testimony give at the Planning C~ssion~ is hearing. pec tfy~f'y ~ybmit Brad Oi~~ a~ / ~~ City P,Yanner :te Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of February 24, 1988 Including Exhibits and Resolution Planning Commission Minutes of February 24, 1988 City Council Resolution ~~I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: February 24, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, CTty planner 8Y: Chris Nestman, Assistant Planner G~G'6rOyC ~~~i ~/ ~> ~, 4. ~h } A F'i ~ ':Z .., i9n SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANGE FOR TERRA VISTA PARKNAY AND ELM AVENUE - proposa o es gna a erra s a ar way es an Terra Vista Parkway East and to designate Nest Elm Avenue to a maior arterial and a collector street respectively within the Terra Vista Planned Camnr~nity. I. ABSTRACT: At the reQuest of Lewis Hemes, street name changes have een n ated for Terra Vista Parkway and Elm Avenue (see attached letter), The street name changes are now before the Planning Commission for their review and consideration. The Planning Commission oust conduct a pu611c hearing and forward a recommendation to the City Council. I1. BACKGROUND: As a special arterial, Terra Vista Dar4wav rune yeneraiiy east and west as a loop road within the Terra Vista Planned Community for approximately 2 miles (see Exhibit "A"1. q second special arterial, Church Street runs the entire length of the planned camunity from Haven Avenue west to Rochester Avenue. Terra Vista parkway intersects Church Street in two locations, Elm Street, a smaller collector loop road, aiso Intersects Church Street in two locations. The intention is to lessen the confusion of the double intersections by renaming the streets with the designations of "east" and "west". III. ANALYSIS: By designating "east" and "west" sections of Terra Vista aD rkway, it will reduce the possibility of confusion due to the double intersections. Staff has contacted several agencies and the general response has been that they are in favor of the street name changes. A concern was brought up regarding the placement of the designations of "west" and "east". It was felt that often with directional prefaces, they are not referenced. If the designations follow the already given street name versus preceding the given street name (e. g. Terra Yista Parkway Nest(, 1t will emphasize the designation, ~~ 2 ITEM K PLANNING CDlMISSIGN STAFF REPORT STREET NAME CHANGE 88-01 February 24, 1988 Page 2 Neither street will have single family residential addresses. However, at this time, there are three apartment complexes with Terra Vista Parkway addresses and a school with a Terra Vista Parkway street address. The greatest impact will be to those apartment dwellers. Potential impacts and issues are outlined below: Major Impacts: 1. Thera are approximately 550 residences of the apartments which would be effected by the name change. Legal documents and forms of identification would have Lo include the "west' designation. Minor Impacts; 1. Street name signs would have to be amended to reflect the changes. 2. Recorded maps would need amendment. 3. Utility companies, emergency services, and the postal service would have to revise their systems to dC COmllada LP LhP moor nhanna IV. FINDINGS: The proposed change is in accordance witA Section 5 of Drdi-nonce No. 144 and can be justified by the following findings: A. It is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan. B. It is consistent with the adopted Circulation Element. C. It will not cause significant adverse effect on the environment. D. ]t is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. Y. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Datl Re ort newspaper, es gnated areas were posted along Terra s a ar way and Church Avenue, and the apartment projects were posted at key areas. ~ -a aG 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STREET NA18: CHANGE 8B-O1 February 24, 1988 Page 3 VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoaaaends that the con c a pu is hearing and consider all proposal. If the Commission should concur Resolution is attached for your consideration. Respf 1y suq ted, ra B r City ner BB: CM ae Attachaknts: Letter frog Lewis Moaxs Exh161t "A' - Location Map Resolution of Approval Planning CoA.ission the aspects of this with the proposal, a K-3 a ~l- "Ori~inal_Poor tluauty_ t~nns -ioMes -a~c~~~reo- CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1156 PonAMwMwnAwnw/PO.Bv 6]0/IIWM(aManW 91]86/]I~9aSW]t P~NiNO DIV:S:O]fl nocemt:er 3. iP8' w Gc~ ~1 191 7i8[a1wIUI~1t1x13i4iS~8 Mr. Chris Westman planning Department !y pf Ranrhb CuramO"ya P~ 7. Bov 807 Rancho Cucamonga, C4 01730 Dear Chris: In =hecklny our plans for Terra Vista, we have noticed Chat we have two tlouble ]ntersectlons; that ]s, two Church Street and Elm 4venue intersections antl two Terra Vista Parkway antl L'h urch Street lntersec Cions. ode have tliscus5etl the matter w1Ch Foothill Fire Dtstr ]c t, the Sner lff's Department antl Debra Meter on Clty Staff. It was felt the oolution of namt ng the street sections "East" and "West" will nct work in the case of Elm Street. Elm Street crosses Foothill Boulevard antl prpceetls nor Ch past Churcn Street where 1t starts a cur !e Cp the northwest, to en cur JOS again to the west. It was agreed by all parties that It would be very confusing tp be dr:vsng nor d'. on 'Elm Street East" after crossing Fcothlll Beulevartl. !t was suggested that Elm Street to the west of .est of Sp~'uce A~.e nue as-Elm'~traet. We o-c~.+17 p^~pose a dlff Brent solution for the two iei ra V15ta -ar4 wd~~ dntl Cnur:h Street lntersectlons. We would like to p'p.]Cie that Terra \'1Std °arkwag west Of M11114 en be re-n3meJ ie.: r'd 1SCd ~3r~Way WesC, dntl r'dt the pGl tlpn e35t Of I11111'n an be ~a-r,a moo Tend Vista Par'•way East. cc~ your convenience, I kayo enclosed a map showing cur propcsetl .^d~p es. Please let us 4np:v what your laeas or solutio~~s on tie T~a ::2r are. If Lh efe dre 3.1y .?gul3[iGnS prpC °il a"9= tnaf ~nz ~ef7 tG b0 aWdre Of, Or tf t"Ere r,e ed5 CG 118 ddd:ClCi~,d. ,, ,__sslan, feel free tp ~_d:l Ic^r Melchor .,~ mo on this natter. i. _.. _ ":ME'; it _.`.~ IFOc^I!F i ~,.,.~,~« ~~`tskr.~ :d']drE r , ~~.4 ::: _,. ~.. ~ ~ cos y _ U , SO'y~T ~ 1 •d- • ~_ T~.~~ ~ '"x ~ r '~ F~ ~~ i ~ .~ ' ~ ~ i.~ B~~ `« t ~ ,,yy~~~ ~~ ~ ~`,,ff~~,, ~ ~T .'~~~~ i P ~ N p/ ~ TERti~/1STA .. 00 eeo~iwu uw • usnce cx~n wrav ruu cucuarv~ NIPMY rur V ti NORTH CITY OF ITEfvt: '~R~'r1+ Gkt~trTE R~~.~~"~Q C~.t~.~rE~ TffLE~ ~~A~'~' IMP ~ ~ PLMiNING D1V15101Y EXHIBIT:---I1--SGLE __1:.--- ~,5 ~.o~ RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROYAL OF STREET NAME CHANGE N0. 88-01 REQUESTING A NAME CHANGE TO DESIGNATE TERRA VISTA PARKNAY NEST AND TERRA VISTA PARKNAY EAST, AND TO DESIGNATE NEST ELM AVENUE FOR A SPECIAL ARTERIAL AND A COLLECTOR STREET RESPECTIVELY NITHIN THE TERRA YISTA PLANNED Cp4MUNITY NHEREAS, on the 24th day of February, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and NHEREAS, on the 20th day of May, 1981, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 144 esta611shing Street Naming policy for Rancho Cucamonga; and NHEREAS, the Planning Division has prepared a report discussing the ,{ustlftcatlon for the change, recasending a replacement name and discussing the Tmpact of the proposed change. NON, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. The proposed change would not create significant adverse impacts on the environment. 2. The proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan. 3. The proposed change is consistent with the adopted circulation element. 4. The street name change is deemed necessary in order to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850.65855 of the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 24th day of February, 1988, of Street Name Change No. 88-91; 2. That the Planning Commission hereby recanaends that the City Council approve and adopt Street Name Change No. BB-O1; and 3. That a certified copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Camnission shall De forwarded to the City Council. ~~6 a°~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. STREET NAME CHANGE 8&01 February 24, 1988 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA BY: arry c e , a ratan ATTEST: ra u er, epu y re ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cas~ission of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, da hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CassNsslon of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaswnga, at a regular sieeting of the Planning Ccaadssion held on the 24th day of February, 1988, Dy the following vote-to-wit: AYES: C014MISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~"~ °~Oa roe. Cutr ire TQI_STOY: EMERI CK, MCNI EL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY Colnaissioner Tolstoy moved to adopt the Resolution for Item J and forward the Ordinance to City Council for adoption. Commissioner Chi ti ea seconded the notion. The motion was carried by the folicwing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, CNITIEA, MCNIEL, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS BLAKESLEY Chalrslan MkNiel stated that he had heard that saneone had received a response frw William Lyon and they support ihts as well. ..**•• K --carried - A Parkway East and W designate West Elm Avenue fora major arterial and a collector street respectively within the Terra Yista Planned Community. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Hearing none, the public hearing was closed. Cox~issianer Tolstoy stated that he supports the name change because of the importance of being able to identify exactly where you are, but is wondering if Lhat is enough of a change in 'Terra Yista Parkway Nest" and "Terra Vista Parkway Easy. Ne was concerned that in an emergency 'East" and "West" might be lost. Chairwan MkNiel stated that the Colwtssion would not be setting a precedent with respect to West and East, every Community has a north, south, east and west streets. Commissioner Toistoy stated that they do not usually tntersect the same street twice. Ne stated that it might De better to call it "West Terra Vista Parkway", rather than "Terra Ytsta Parkway West". Commissioner Chltiea stated that she felt that would make more sense. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated that is the system used in Yictoria on their loop streets. Planning Coawission Mfnutes -12- February 24, 1988 aoq Comaissioner Chi ti ea suggested the sane for East Elm because someone could drop the Nest from Elm. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated the reason that was not done on that stretch was because it does generally run in a east-west direction, Dut when it hits Church Street, it is basically running south. If the Commmission was going to change it, maybe the name should be changed completely. Coamtssioner Tolstoy stated that he would not like to see the Commission alter the theme of Terra Vista Parkway. Ne did not think Nest and East Terra Vista Parkway would violate that. Ne stated in the case of Elm Street, there should be two different names. Chairman McNiel re-opened the public hearing. Candace Frank, Lewis Homes, stated that it made sense to thn that Elm Avenue at Foothill remain Elm Avenue, because 1f you make it East Elm, you will be driving north on Elm, cross Foothill, and you wilt be on East Elm. She felt that would be too confusing for people. She stated that they d/5cutsed 1t with City staff and that was the suggestion they came up with. Chairman McNiel questioned if Elm runs below Foothill as well. Candace Frank stated that yes it does. That was why they did not want to change it to Hest Elm and East Elm. They felt it was important to have the continuity at Foothill. They felt that designating the street as west Elm Avenue, the wezt would not get lost. As far as Terra Vista Parkway, is was suggestetl terra Vista Parkway East and west. Terra Vista Parkway west is currently constructed, Terra Vista Parkway East Ts not. She stated there will be no addresses on either street except there are currently addresses on Terra Vista Parkway Nest that are apartments. She would assume that from the start, everyone living east of Milliken, if they lived on Terra Vista Parkway East, would know that is that nave with no confusion, She believed the preferred designation was Terra Vista Darkway East and west, but they would be willing to work with that. She stated that she felt it was very important that Elm Street remain that at Foothill. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chi ti ea stated she still agrees with Commissioner Tolstoy that Nest needs to precede it. She stated that as far as keeping Eim at Foothill, that is reasonable. Chairman McNiel stated that the proposal he would support would be prefix Terra Vista Parkway with East and Nest and to leave Elm Street and Nest Elm Street. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed. Planning Commission Minutes -13- February 24, 198b ~~~ Coa~isstoner Chi ti ea iaoved to approve the resolution as iaodifled. Coanissiener Tolstoy secoMed the motion. The n~otton carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, ENERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY : * :. a + --carried MEY BUSINESS M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REYIEN 87-53 eve opaw:n o ve n us r a s ribution buildings totaling 423,827 square feet on 22 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 13) located at the southeast corner of 6th Street a~ Buffalo Avenue - APN: 229-263-10 through 13. Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, presented staff report. Chatriaan McNtel opened the public hearing. lee Redaand, with O'Donnell, Anastrong, Brighas, representing the applicant, stated they concur with the staff report. Chaira~n McNiel closed the public hearing. Coawissioner Chitiea saved to approve the resolution. Coawissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. The alotion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, EMER[CK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY •.•^*• --carried N. APPEAL OF TREE REMbYAL DERMIT 88-03 - PRATNER - An appeal of s s ec son o eny a reawva a ree Eucalyptus trees at the rear of a single fa~aily hoiae within the Very Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9200 Golden - APN: 1062-221-09. Dan Loleaun, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Planning Coanlssion Minutes -14- a'l February 24, 1988 RESQLUTION N0. R it ~ ~ `7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF f'~~ RANCFKf CUCAM046A, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME 0~i TERRA VISTA PARKWAY TO TERRA VISTA PARKMA1l'AI$1 ifq[ TERRA VISTA PARKMAY AND ESTABLISHING MILLIKEN AVENUE AS THE DIVIDING NTERSECTION Cl~.Cvfl- NHEREAS, street names have been assigned which will create double intersections with the sale names. WHEREAS, emergency service personnel need to be able to detenalne street locations without hesitation. WHEREAS, the proposed changes will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment. WHEREAS, the proposed changes are consistent with the goals and policies and standards of the General Pian. WHEREAS, the proposed changes are deemed necessary 1n order to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby designate Terra Vista Parkway, which runs approximately 2 miles from Churc1~ L to Church Street, to be henceforth known asJbatT~~~11''~~ra Vista Parkxal+~ r tdof Milliken Avenue, and¢nLi Terra Vista ParkwalF'lolyt of Milliken Avenue, effective 90 days from the date of this action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Cierk be directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors, County of San Bernardino, as set forth in Section 34092 of the Government Code, of the State of California. ~ ~~ i, ~ ~ /: a ~~.. J ~ t W J } k II 1 II I u al3 p~~n' ~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME ~ ELM AYEIRIE~NEST OF SPRUCE AYENUE)T07~' ELM AVENUE del-~C" NHEREAS, street nooks have been assigned which will create double intersections with the save nooks. NHEREAS, eaw!rgency service personnel need to be able to deterwine street locations without hesitation. NHEREAS, the proposed changes will not create significant adverse iapacts on the envlrolMient. NHEREAS, the proposed changes are consistent with the goals and policies and standards of the General Plan. NHEREAS, the proposed changes are dee~ed necessary in order to protect the public health, safety, caaMort, convenience, and general welfare. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaagngaa,~~~i~~g hereby designate E1^ Avenue, west of Spruce Avenueeas ~Yaci Els Avenue,~'BP~fecttve 90 days fraAt the date of this action. 8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be directed to fot~vard a copy of this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors, County of San Bernardino, as set forth in Section 34092 of the 6overnaenL Code, of the State of California. ~r µ_ a~4 WET kVd. z,5 GXH1,~1''/~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering technician SUBJECT: Approval of Amending Map, Tract No. 10827-2, located in the Victoria Planned Community, submitted by Mira Mar Land Company, Incorporated, A California Corporation, and U.S. Hanes Corporation, a Delaaare Corporation RECOMI£NBATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Amending Map, Tract Mo. 10827-2, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause safd map to record. Background/Analysts Tract No. 10827-2, located in the Victoria Planned Community, was approved by City Council on April 16, 1986, and recorded on May 1, 1986. Changes in the lot lines, of the map, were approved at Design Review nn Mav 13 10A7 rho do„e i,...e.. w~.. ~._ ~,. CMrwanr. Incorporated, A California Corporation and U.S. Hames~ Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, are submitting the amending map at this time. Respectfully bmitted, ,% ~ ~ RHM:LB: Attachment a~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~~ " ~p ~~ R RF.SOLUTIOtI OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP TRACT N0. 10827-2 WHEREAS, the Amending Map of Trott No. 10827-2, consisting of 100 lots, submitted by Mira Mar Land Company, Incorporated, A California Corporation, and U. S. Homes Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Subdividers, located south of Wilson Avenue, between Haven and Hennasa Avenues, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6y said Subdividers for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, the original Tract Map No. 10827-2 was approved by the City on June 17, 1987, as Resolution No. 86-94 and recorded on May 1, 1986, Book 188 pages 79 thru 83; and NHEREAS, the developers have made a significant nimber of changes of lot lines to accommodate specific housing units; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements esta611shed as prerequisite to approval of the Amending Map of said Tract said subdividers submit for approval said Amending Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that the offers for dedication anA rtio emecnicy Hap dtl7i,cdi.iny sane are nereoy approved and the Cfty Clerk 1s authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City and record said map. RESOLUTION N0. ~ Q ~ a ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG11, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP TRACT N0. ~ ~~L(,4~ C, 10827-2 ) WHEREAS, tli¢, Amending Map of Tract No. 10827-2, consist~g of 100 lots, submitted by MirL~Mar Land Canpany, Incorporated, A California Corporation, and U.S. Hodie~s Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Subdividers, located in the Victoria P10nned Community, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said SubZlividers for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the~State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 29~of said City; and WHEREAS, the original Tract MaD No. 10827-2 was approved by the City on June 17, 1987, as Resolution No. 88-94 and recorded on May 1, 1986, Book 188 pages 79 thru 83; and WHEREAS, the developers have made`.a significant nu~er of changes of lot lines to accommodate specific housing uniSs; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements est ltshed as prerequisite to approval of the Amending Map of said Tract said subdividers submit for aDProval said Amending Map offering for dedlcation~ffor public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cd~ Vncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that the offers for dedica`tton and the Amending nap aeiinean ng same are hereby approved and the City Clei~is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City and ecord said map. / -~`~ ~~ ~'lson AVenue J vV y U V J I V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION N rrErt: 'Amending Tract 10827-2 ERFTiBPf; a~8 --- CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~~-cy DATE; A ril 6 1988 ~~~4'` P T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNE%ATION N0. 16 FOR DR 87-31, WEST Of LUCAS RANCH ROAD TO IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ~ RECOME110I1TION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with ann<.,t i,.r uc Ig tc L..Csc-..- ~-i;,te1,---~ •~ ..p.. ~ w.~c uiaLt i~l riu. v for OR 87-31. The developer of the subject development has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-110. Respe sub fitted, ~/ i~ RH Attachments 219 RESOLUTION N0. F'j ~ .. ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 16 TO LRN DSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87-31 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-111 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to landscape Maintenance District No. 3, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-111 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-111 according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing nn ftln in the office of the City Clerk; and - WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the furisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said Cfty Council having nav acquired ,lurisdictfon to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucmnonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-111, be done and made; and SECTION 2; Be it further resaived that the report ffled b_v the Engineer is- e~ finally approved; and SECTION 3: 8e it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment in Che Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin untoafter 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 220 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report fur Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 Annexation No. 16 for DR 81-31 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chzpter 1, Oivisi on 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California {Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972}, SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex ail new developments into Landscape Maintenance District Na. 3. The City Council has determined the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all the developments as mentioned above. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed developments are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to he granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications the plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval far the development and as approved 6y the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject development Dl an and the assessment ~ianr qm fnr the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscapeu Lapro•:^c^.t ^^ the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said p.a~~; .:^: specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred by the District for parkway and median irnprovement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers and or/by the City. Based on historical data, Contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (E. 30) tents Der square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is r.omprised of Parrel MaD 7349, comprised of 8 parcels, totaling 6,057 square feet. The district was formed in October 5, 1983, for the maintenance of landscaping a detention basin and Storm drain within the project. This zone will be assessed on per lot basis for the maintenance costs within the project bountlary only as stipulated in the Engineer's Report for the formation of the District. LZI Zone 2 is comprised of all other projects that are being annexed or wfll be annexed to this ntctrtct_ All lots or aarcels within Zone 2 will be assessed on net acre basis for the maintenance of landscaped median islands on Haven Avenue from 4th Street to Deer Creek Channel, Foothill Boulevard and 4th Street from west to east City limit, Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, from 4th Street to Foothf 11 Boulevard, 6th Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue and median islands on other major divided highways and same parkways within the Industrial Specific Plan Area and Foothill Boulevard overlay area. The estimated cast for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 including Annexation Na. 16 is as follows. Zone 1 Existing District Total estimated maintenance cost E2,070 Assessment units 8 Total cost - assessment unit for year and month 5270 E258.75/year or f21.56/mo./lot Zone 2 Existing Annexation New District No. 16 Total Total ectimat ad annual maintenance area - Sq. Ft. 0 0 p Assessment units, acres 380,594 7,31 380,601 Total cost r assessment unit for year and month _ 0,30 = E 0 /year 0 /mo./acre Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated 1n Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Fxhtb;t A", by *.M s reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. .L.L/~, SECTION 6. Assessment Iuipr uvanents ror the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots wf thin the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel for Zone 1 and shall be equal to the next acreage far each lot ar parcel in Zone 2. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the previous ffscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3, City Council conducts pu611c hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the Ctty Engineer files a report with the City Councll. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the indi of dual assessments. X23 Properties and improvements to 6e included within Annexation No. 16 (Zone 2) to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3: PROPERTIES PROJECT ACREAGE DR 87-31 (lot 7 of TR 1936) 5,38 (pcl 1 of PM 6596) 1.93 7.31 IMPROVEMENT AREAS TO BE ANNEXED IN ANNEXATION N0. 1 Area Sit. Haven Avenue 0 Foothill Boulevard 0 Milliken Avenue 0 4th Street 0 Rochester Avenue 0 ocn xreei u 2a4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ANNEXATION N0, /b SITE °`~~"`~'^ CITY OF RANCHO Cl'CA~IONGA w n tt t37-~1! ;' f •`~ „ „ e ENGINEERING DIVISION w T ~~ ~_s VICINITY ~1:AP 1\~II a ~ P B --- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPnRm DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russeil H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ~~, ~~= SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 2 FOR TRACT NOS. 13557, 13562 AND 13559 (CARYN) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RECOMIEMMTION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 2 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the Work in connecci mr wicn Hnnexacion no. 2 cu Landscape naincenance uiscn ct no. o for Tract Nos. 13557, 13562, and 13559 (Caryn). The developer of the subject tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-112. Respect lly submitted, ~~ ` RHM.JA:d Attachments 2fo RESOLUTION N0. O p ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CROERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION NITH ANNE1(ATION N0. 2 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13557, 13562 AND 13559 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-113 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 2 to Landscape Maintenance District Na. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-113 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intentfon, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit o° Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real Droperty proposed to he assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of intention No. 88-113, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. which sa1A roni e< woro duly m,i ion i...l.e .iT~ cc... ._d manner as required by law, as aDDears from the Affidavit of Mailing'on fileyin the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,lurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo~l~at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-113 be done and made; and SECTION 2: Re it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer is"- e~by finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment ;n a ngineer's Report are hereby approved, SECTION 4: Be tt finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unti a ter 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. x-27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 Annexation No. 2 for Tract Nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 (Caryn) SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new subdivisions into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. Ail landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as aDProved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or deve lapment plan and the assessment. diagram for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent a5 if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estfmated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (E. 30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cast data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 I nr.l ud ing Annexation Nn. 2 Is as fniipws; Existing Annex New District No. 2 Total Landscape Area 771,110 118,095 889,205 No, of O. U. 729 167 896 22S Per Lot Annual Assessment 889 20_.~_X .30 , 529 = 524.81 Assessment shall apply to each let as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated far inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments Shall be reduced. SECTIDN 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6, Assessment Improvements for the District are found Lo 6e of general benefit to all lots within the Dfstrict and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Slhere there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Counci] will hold a public hearing in June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the Ctty during the previous fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required ~~ t!:c ! ,nwcraoe and Lighting Act of 1972. SEC?ION 7, Crder of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the Dfstrict or abandon the Droceedings, 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 22`~ P~overCi25 ei~u iifyrUVemenis io oe inc iuded within Annexation No. 2 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6: MAINTAINED AREA TRACT D(U TU 0 R Sq-~• ~_ - 13551 30 Perimeter 7,906 27,129 13559 74 and Loop 1,382 29,432 13562 63 Streets _2x932 49,313 167 12,220 105,875 210 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM I.ANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. (o ANNEXATION N0.2 - TURF GROUND COVER ~~ ~~ 7,906 S.F. 9,070 S.F. `~~~°'^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~IONGA \ . 3~sr1' '. ~, -rte' ~ ENGINEERIVG DIVISION ~, 6'~' VICINITY MAP nn 47,139 S.F. N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTIiIi:l riv. b ANNEXATION N0. Z -TURF GROUND COVER ~~ •~ 1,384 S.F. I VY ~.~ 13,701 S.f. GROUND COVER ~~ 2D,134 S.f. ~~c=u sr' ^t^, CITY OF RANCHO Cl,'C~~IONGA w TR 135h2 i I_." 3 ~' ~ = / \ _~ ~ ~ ENGINEERING pIVI510N ~ T ~ VICINITY S1AP Ili~ll inn ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LAIYU$b'Are MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. (c ANNEXATION N0.2 ~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~~i !~ ~~ ~: u w u v v as ~ n a x+ s u ~~ 1 ALA s '` a - TURF GROUND COYER ~~I~alnl nl'ml~IpI~~~ w ~a~>ts~M~N~a~n~plw °~M~s~~a~n~a~p~p~n~~ ~I~IAI~I>»I~elnlalal w TURF ~€- 2,932 S.F, ~ ~.~ 18,56D S.F. GROUND COYER ~~! 49,314 S.F. . y``'`'~9~a ~ CITY OF RAN"CHO Ct,'CA,~IOIVCA ~ 955 ~ 1; ,, _, -~~,' ? EN(;INEflRING DIVISION y iin VICINITY ~IAP - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAiE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide ~,,, ~f SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION ND. 39 FOR TRACT NOS. 13557, 13562, 13559 AND DR 87-31 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 RECOIIENDATIpI: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexatfon No. 39 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the pork in rnnnnr}inn Wi*h a.n a~inn un 7a •n c~.__, Li~M i... rn ~a rtCr ~::LC ~i7t-iC: ~... .~ No. 1 for Tract Nos. 13557, 13562, 13559 and OR 87-31. The developers of the subject projects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-114. Respe f y submitted, RHM:JA: w Attachments RESOLUTION N0. r~$'a~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK 1N CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 39 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13551, 13562, 13559 AND DR 81-31 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-115 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 39 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-115 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the off Tce of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file Tn the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-115, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as requires oy iaw, as appears from the Affidavit of Marling on file in the office of the Cfty Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-115, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Heport filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a~- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's e~porE-are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tract- s >lave been occupied. ~~ X35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Er,g ;- peoort for Street Lighting Maintenance District No, i Annexation No. 39 for Tracts 13557, 13559, 13562 and DR 87-31 SECTtON 1, Authority for Report This report is in compli ante with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highwa s Code, State of California (Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 2. General Description This Li ty Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots dfrectly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments estabiishe4 by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector ~t~eerc) as shown on the Li ghtinS District Alt as Map which 9s on file with the City tngineer. i„N~o.a-cat a;•intonanre is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and ccst shalt be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and S,pecificatians The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the tlevelopers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as aDProved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the enact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a Dart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were alt ached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include; the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 2 3 (o SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No torts will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 has been demarcated into two zones. Zone 1 is comprised of street light improvements on maior streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, condominiums and apartments) throughout the City. Each dwelling unit in this zone will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. Zone 2 is comprised of all industrial, commercial and institutional projects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in Zone 1. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Enerav Cost: No. of Lamps lamps Annex New Lamp Lamp Size* YTD No. 39 Total 58001 d44 n nnn 9500E 485 0 485 16,000E I6 0 16 22,000E 4 0 4 21,500E __ 6 0 6 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lamps Rate Mo's Maint. Cost 5800E 444 X S 8.93 X 12 S 47,579.04 9500E 485 X 510.16 % 12 59,131.20 16,000E 16 % 512.08 X 12 = 2,319.36 22,000E 4 X f13,84 X 12 664.32 2',500 6 % 515.71 t t? = 2,939.52 Total Annual Matnt. Cost = 5112,633.44 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annexation 16,063 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 = 182 Total Assessment Units - 16,245 a3~ 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost E112 633.44 = E6.91/year/unit No. o n sin str ct ~6,2.4~ Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1^, Annexation No. 39. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTIDN 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Hhen units are based on acreage, assessment w111 be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a Oistrict and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in dune, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. JO EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Rnnexation No. 39 to Street lighting Maintenance District 1: Assess. No. of Lamps to be Annexed Project Acreage ni 58000-95000`T6~-T£,~IIQ(-2T30'OC Zone 1 TR 13551 --- 30 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ TR 13559 --- 74 --- --- --- --- --- TR 13562 --- 63 --- --- --- --- ___ Total --- 167 --- --- --- --- --- Zone 2 DR 87-31 lot 7 of rR 7936 5.38 11 pcl 1 of PM 6596 1_93 4 Total 7.31 15 a3~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3 9 ~ ruaF GROUND COVER TURF AREA 7,Y06 S.F. SIDEWALK ARC 9,070 S.F. ~a~`~ ;^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONOA .- .,: •. ~ COUNTR OF 8AN HERNARDIIYO y; `~;~ ~ STATE OF CALIII'ORNU --~~ GROUND SOVER AREA 27,129 S.F. N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 pNNE)cATION NO. 3 9 +I'1716I3141'I'I/ 10 / 1t' 72 117 114 116 116 I 77 -~1 ~I~Ia I21 Im I tf l 16 1~~2' I'i a a1 22 ab x - TURF GROUND COYER 74 n ra nllbl e1" 1 166 rlyl~Ipl nl plplN u I'~I6'llul Stlbplgl4'I~I4s 7612612712.12.1.61.11~1"I~ TU A Y,934 S.F. SIDEWALK AREA 18,569 S.F. GROUND DOVER AREA 49,314 S.F. ,,~~~! ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA TFZ 13 559 ~~~ . COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDII~10 '° : STATE OF CAI.II~ORNIA ~ T 'c~ lv ~~ - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 p~EXATN~N NO, 3 9 i - TURF ® GROUND COVER '{~ AREA 1,382 S.F. SID W K A~ 13,701 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 28,132 S.F. aS~l9y. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1tONGA S''°' '> COUNTY OF SAN ggRNARDINO ~`-` ' OF CAI.IFORPIU- N . i STAT& =' 6 ~ -~_ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 ANNEXATION NO. 3 9 `c ~ _Jtr --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1986 J T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEKATION N0. 12 FOR DR 87-31 LOCATED NORTH OF FOURTH STREET AND WEST OF LUCAS RANCH ROAD TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 RfCOMENDNTION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 and approving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in .ne~r:,.n w;rh annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No.~ 6 for OR 87-31. The developer of the sub,ieci pioje~I ima t"' notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-116. Resp submitted, Attachments ~' l ~~ i2~`~ RHM:JA: 24~} r.ESDwr.DN ND. ~ ~ - ~n.5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 ANO ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DR 87-31 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of March, 1988, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-117 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-111 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and nu~er as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolutior, of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 89-117, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required bV law. as goo P.arC from the aifiATV1* of Ma. 17"~ ~" Filn :~ the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, sofa City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdi ctien facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1; It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-117, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report flied by the Engineer is hereby finaity approved; and--- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment to the Engineer's~t are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tracts ave been occupied. a~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 6 Annexation No. 12 for OR 81-31 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requ~i rements of Artfcle 4, Chapter 1, Divfsinn 15 of the Streets and Highwa s Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECT (ON 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Nork to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on major streets (arterial and certain collector streets) as shown on the Lighting District Altos Map which is ~~~ i iie wi iii Lira Ci Ly Enyineen improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the su6,ject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made apart of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specif icy were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. f SECTION 4. Estimated Casts No costs will be incurred far street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be construCed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be Cased on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is comprf sed of street light improvements on local streets for all industrial, commercial and institutional pro3ects throughout the City. It has been determined that one acre of land in industrial, commercial and institutional areas derives the same benefit as two assessment units in residential zones. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamb Lamb Size* YTD No. 12 Total 5800E 44 3 47 9500E 2 0 2 *High Pressure Sodium Yapor Total Total Annual Lamp Size Lam s Rate Mo•s ~iotnt. Cca 5800E 47 X 5 8.93 X 12 = 55,036.52 9500E 2 X 510.16 X 12 = 243.84 Total gnnual Maint. Cost 55,280.36 2. Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before Chis annexation = 393 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 15 Total Assessment Units 408 aa-~ 3. Cost per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost ES 280.36 E12.94/year/unit No, o n is n stn ct ~~~ Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment of a9ram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6°, Annexation No. 12. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to De of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. When units are Eased on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. Cfty Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony ana determines to form a District or abandon the Droceedfngs. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. a~-e EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District 6: Assess. No. of Lam s to be Annexed Pro ect Acred92 Urn t-- L L L DR 87-31 iot 1 of TR 1936 5,38 11 --- --- --- --- --- pcl 1 of PM 6596 1.94 4 --- --- --- --- --- Total 1.31 15 3 --- --- --- --- a4q ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CISTRICT NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. / SITE ~c}SAP>;. ,~ s+ >~ .._ ,. '- i ~: ~ z ~m crrsr of x.+xcao cuc,UaoxG~ COUNTY OF 8AN BEBNARDINO n N nmmv no n ~ ~rn~in rn rn ~ w~nvn . eCiiaAiiaL', lYLl Vi~Ll DATE: March 25, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Cfty Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Junior Engineering Aide u i SUBJECT: ORDERING THE NORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 2 FOR TRACT NOS. 13557, 13562 .AND 13559 (CARYN) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 RELOMIEN011TION: [t is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and aDProving the Engineer's Report. BACKGROUN O/ANALYSIS Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in rnnna rYi nn uiih annevatinn Nn 7 fn ctrm~ Ii~hH n~ M>: nt n~anro of qtr: Ct No. 5 for Tract Nos. 13557, 13562 and 13559 (Caryn). The developer of the sub,{ect tracts has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report tentatively approved by Resolution No. 88-118. Respectfu submitted, ~_ /~ RH Attachments 2.51 RESOLUTION N0. ~ p -~OC. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 2 TD STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 AND ACCEPTING THE fINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13557, 13562 AND 13559 WHEREAS, Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of March, 1988, adapt its Resolution of Intention No. 88-119 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5, which Resolution of Intention No. 88-119 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on fife in the office of the City Clerk; and NHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 88-119, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time. form. and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,lurisdfction to order the proposed (vork. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga EEliat the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 68-119, be done and made; and SECTION 2: the Neport filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; any SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eDOr are hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said ;racts ave been occupied. ~.5 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Matnten ante District No. 5 Annexation No. 2 for Tracts 13557, 13559 and 13562 SECTION 1, Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Hfghways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Councfl has elected to annex all new developments into Street Lighting Maintenance District Mo. 5. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon ail lots within said developments as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light "'r-~ '"'fit. ^„„+„~•,~• ee sore /a.~nrial rnA rorTatn rniler.tor streets)~as shown on the Lighting District Altos Map which is on file with the City Engineer. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be assessed on a per unit basis. SECTION 3, Plans and Specffications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as aDProved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the sub,)ect tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement or, the individual development is hereby made apart ^f this report to the same extent 35 if said plans and spec if;rs were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the sub,)ect area. a53 SECTIw a, [etimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 is comprised of street light improvements on local streets for residential improvements (single family, multi-family, tondaminiums and apartments) within the Caryn Planned Camnunity, Each dwelling unit will be assessed as one assessment unit for the operation of the District. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 is shown below: 1, S.C.E, Maintenance and Energy Cost: No. of Lamps Lamps Annex New Lamb L amo Si ze* YTD No. 2 Total 5800E 129 39 168 9800E 0 0 0 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Total Total Annuai Lamp Size Lamps Rate rio's .,a..;t. C 5800E 168 % E 8.93 % 12 518,002,88 9500E 0 % 510.16 X 12 = 0 Total 'Annual Mai nt. Cost = 518,002.88 2, Total Assessment Units: YTD Assess Units before this annezatton 470 Assessment Units this annex per page 4 = 167 Total Assessment Uni ts - 637 ~,~4 3. Cast per Assessment Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost = 118 VU2.88 x28.26/yeari~nit No. o Un is n D strict ~6'37- Assessment shall apply to each lot or parcel as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", Annexation No. 2. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report, SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all units within the District and that assessment shall De equal for each unit. When units are based on acreage, assessment will be 2 units per net acre. SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of PreiTminary Approval of City Engineers Report. 2. City Council adapts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers ail testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the Droceedings. 4, Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the indfvidual assessments. a~ EXHIBIT "A" iroperiies ana Improvements to he included within Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance Otstri ct 5: Assess. No. of Lzm s to he Annexed Pro ect Acreage U~- L s_ L L 13557 --- 30 8 --- --- --- --- 13559 --- 74 18 --- --- --- --- 13562 --- 63 13 --- --- --- --- 137 33 _ - --- asp ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.5 ANNEXATION NO. 2 - TURF ® GROUND COVER TURF ~~ 0 N COVER 7,906 S.F. 47,120 S.F. ~~ ~~ 9,070 S.F. ~~~`~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1lONGA ~ 3S5 :.,_; •. ' ~ COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO s STATE OF CALII+'ORNIA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.5 ANNEXATION NO. Z - TURf ® GROUND COVER TURF AREA 4,032 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA ~jI~I~;L-_L4:r~7~ 18,560 S,F. ,.c~~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA ~'.,,;'..\' . COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO .?~ru, ~ c ~. ~~ i 8TATE OF CAI.IIrORNU --~- 40,314 S.F. N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.5 ANNEXATION NO. Z - TURF GROUND COVER I5l8E Aid 1,38 S.F. SIDEWALK AREA 13,7D1 S.F. GROUND COVER AREA 4D,{31 S.F. - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Review of staffs denial construct drive approach on west of Morning Canyon Way, Canyon Nay. RECOMMEIID11T10N: of application for permit to the southside of Hillside Road, Blakely Residence, 5514 Morning It fs recommended that City Council not approve a drive approach for vehicular ingress and egress on the south side of Hillside Road, west of Morning Canyon Way, ad,{atent Lo 5514 Morning Canyon Nay. Background/Analysis The homeowner located at 5514 Morning Canyon Nay submitted to the Fnginearina Division an application for a construction permit to construct a drive approach on the south side of Hillside Moaa ,lust west of Morning Canyon Nay. After review of the application by staff, it was determined that the proposed approach would be too close to the intersection and there is an existing approach located on the south side of Hillside Road at the rear lot line of the sub,7ect property The homeowner, in anticipation of obtaining a permit, constructed an on- site driveway that encroaches on Hillside Road right-of-way. The homeowner has been directed by staff to remove the existing driveway from the Hillside pu611c right-of-way. The property owner contends that prior verbal approval was given by staff. Staff members that would have reviewed the proposed drive approach with the applicant, do rrot recall any prior approval. Monte Prescher contacted Mrs. Blakely in December when it was first noticed that a concrete slab had been constructed in the Hillside Right- of-way. Mrs. Blakely was advised that an approach at that location may not be Dossi6le, also, that non-vehicular access may be indicated on the recorded Tract map. She advised that the City Engineer, during the Council meeting regarding the block wall, had given verbal approvai~. 2~0 City Council Staff Report Blakely Residence February 17, 1988 o ~g~ ~ After some research, Mrs. Blakely was told that a drive approach at that location would not be possible, even though access is not restricted on the Tract Map and that the City Engineer did not give prior aDProval. The application was then received and denied. Mr. Blakely contacted the City Engineer and indicated that during discussion in August, 1987 at the counter regarding the block wall, Monte Prescher had verbally approved the proposed approach. Although Monte Prescher does not recall givfng verbal approval, it is possible that the approach may have been discussed. However, the applicant would have been advised to submit an application prfor to commencing with any work. The driveway located within the Hillside Road right-of-way was constructed without a permit. The property owner should have obtained a permit prior to constructing improvements in the right-of-way. See attached letter advising the property owner that an approach at the proposed location cannot be aDDroved, Respectfull submitted, c RHM: a tt achmenTs a~~ ..ii. t . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t0,1 watt a„ wr, a,erLO Clummel. CiIWaW ulJw, <rJtJ sn-Jul January 21, 1988 Mr. Carl E. Blakely 5514 Morning Canyon Way Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Blakely: This letter is to regard to your application of January 12, 1988, far a permit to construct a drive approach on Hillside Road west of Morning Canyon Way. After reviewing the application, a visual inspection was pefformed at the site. It has been determined that the application cannot be approved for the fallowing reasons: 1. The proposed drive approach is too close to the intersection of a collector street (Hillside Road). 2. There is existing rear yard access and a drive approach west of the proposed drive approach. In addition, the existing on-site concrete slab encroaches upon City right-of-way. The City right-of-way at that area on Hillside Road is thi rtnnn loot frnm the iota of fhP rurh That nnrt inn of rnn rrPLP Clah or driveway will have to be removed from the right-of-way within two weeks from receipt of this letter. Understand that if any verbal approvals are given, they are tentative until the application is received and a proper review and investigation of the proposed improvement can be conducted. Your applieation was reviewed by the City Engineer, the Public Works Engineer and other staff menbers to determine if any tentative approval had been given. To their knowledge, no tentative approval was given. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Monte Prescher Public Works Engineer ~M~ eve ~. liland Public Works Inspector SMG:sd v:...• UeECrih N Brown Q'11111. ~. 51001 Chit~tiJ aUQ Y tI ~~ ~OrL (~wnln•n4n Jenny King PuneliJ Wnghl Gn Nawin VUftll hJ W~iS5t n11N Pat & Carl 9!ake!y ss 14 Morning Canyon Way niia Loma, La. 91 /U I Lot 27, ?ract !0047 ?o: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager, Rancho Cucamonga (Ref Jan ~ 1, ~ 988 memo: Drive Approach, Hillside Road) xc City Clerk Sir, y Again we are request!r.g to appear before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council ?his time to Beak a variance to construct a driveway approach on Hil Iside road 38' West of Morning Canyon Way. A concrete driveway Is already In place, After our last problem with obtain!ng approval for our wall facing H!!iside we made sure we reviewed the desired drive access with Monte Prescher. On Sept i s, 1987, my husband and Tom Sanders (our ".ilder) asked Monte Prescher about the H!llsitle driveway approach and the Clty Property conflict After about thirty-five (35) minutes o` examin!rg large blue prints and plot maps, Mr P^escher assured the •'roo r.'z! we "~zd ~+o problem !n oota!ning a perm't W!th this '`"Orma:'cr 'we proCeedeC to have our builder construct the tlf!VCW ay ~^ 4r`_,no unro t^C :~.~ ,y.,t (~~~~ ii Vni i'iVn Ce/ Cna[ C^.e (!na dr!VPWay z:cess aoo~ova! could be obtained when the driveway was completed, x`^.e^ ws tooK a drawing of the proprosed access down to C!ty Offices ~~~''^ai approval, our request was denied. 5!nce then we have a~so ~eceroed a ~etter, dated Jan. 2I, 1988, from the Uty Engineer mg "`/';'~^ that sa!d [hat the concrete slab bunt to fac!!itate H!I!side 3C'BSs, has t0 be fembVeO W't""^ tW;'N?eks~ '~ 4ya'^ We have had a terf'^~~ o•on'a.n .N'.~ :~ _...'0^s ,N'~n "^e _^1 'staff Please put !„ . _ _ ''i _... ,. , aCe^da ~0' ^P `eb ' 7t^ -a.:., _ ~cp3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Mayor, Members of City Council, City Manager FROM: Robert A. Riz z~~o~~Q~,{(~~((saistant City Manager By: Kathy 5orensen:.lSenior Recreation Supervisor SUBJECT: Approval of MusVUic and Amplification Policy RECOMMENDATION• cU~MO'1c a ~~ Vii- III F. ~ Ile -~--iy-; ~.I Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Music and Amplification Policy ae it relates to City park facilities. EVALUATION• On 5eptembar 15, 1987, the Director of Community Services notified the Park and Recreation Commission of complaints received on the noise levels generated at the Amphitheater located in Red Hill Community Park. He also notified the Commission that he had issued a directive which would discontinue private use of the amphitheater until such time as reoulations worn Ac..n l..~....a r ry,lic ~aa. l~~y wan iieia that evening. At the conclusion of the hearing the Commission felt the park was for the enjoyment oP the members of the community and should include musical enjoyment. The Commissioners indicated the rights of surrounding neighbors needed to be addressed regarding the noise level. it was the Commissions direction that the directive remain in place until a policy could be set. At the October 20, 1987 meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission, a draft policy was submitted regarding a proposed music and amplification policy. The Commission requested that a warning notification system and en "escape cleuse~~ (basically an ability to waive restrictions or provide for special exceptions) be incorporated into the policy. On November 19, 1967 the flraft was resubmitted with the additional requests. This draft policy was reviewed by the commission. ac~4 Music and Amplification Policy City council Hearing April 6, 1988 Page 2 During the drafting of the policy, copies were sent to the Coda Enforcement Office as well as the City Attorney for review. The final draft was reread by the City Attorneys office. It was determined that some wording still needefl to be changed and the proposed deposit and fine system might pose legal problems. Therefore, he suggested the policy be written specifically in line with the Municipal Code and any related penalties therein defined. Code Enforcement is agreeable but feels we could make the regulations tighter if community service deslrefl to create a separate ordinance. since the Municipal Code eats standards which neighbors should adhere to regarding neighboring property we did agree that we should at least adhere to the same regulations and tighten later if necessary. Therefore, this policy is based upon what your next door neighbor could do without penalty. Sound Monitoring will be provided by a Coda Enforcement officer who hoe legal authority to enforce the Code and also naa Lrainina in sound monitoring. The coat oP their service will be bore by the applicant, for the entire time the mu>iu or amplification will ba required including any pre-check, at a time and a half houYly salary inaluding benefits. This fee will be deposited with the City prior to any use of the facility. Under General Regulations number seven (7) ie included to provide some additional leeway in providing for special circumstances. Some examples are: A community wide use of a neighborhood park like Windrows. Citrus Little Leagues use of Red Hill; Alta Loma Riding Club an8 4-H use of Heritage; which we may want to monitor on a periodic basis end establish a pro-paid Pea far one hour, unannounced monitoring during n season or event versus paying for each hour of amplified use which could be prohibitive. This oleo allows for any use ahich may hove U.S. Constitution First Amendment protection. ass Music and Amplification Policy City Council Maetinq April 6, 1988 Page 3 The results of the Perk and Recreation Commission and the City Attorney are ettached in the proposed Music and Amplification Policy along with any pertaining ordinance in the Municipal Code. Respectfully Submitted, Robert A. Rizzo Assistant City Manager RAR:ICAS Attachments: Music and AmpllYicacian raiiuy Sections of Municipal Code ac~~ D Rl1 FT SUBJECT: Public Facilities Reservation and Fee Policy POLICY/PROCEDURE: Music and Amplification Policy (f ile:muslcamppol) A. General Regulations: 1. All general rules and group priorities as specified in Public Facilities Reservation 6 Fee Policy are applicable, There are special, additional provisions for reservations which require music or amplification. 2, All music and amplified systems must be approved in writing by the Community Services Department a minimum of to working days in advance of the event, or before any publicity is issued. Which ever comae first. 7. Tha application must specify exact areas of requested use; exact type of music, program and type of amplification to be used. 4. The Communlty Services Department may require a meeting with the user group prior to approval of the event. 5. Applicant will be charged for a city representative *n mnnitnr the music or amplified event. 6. Music or Amplification will not be allowed in City designated neighborhood parka or mini-parks except as allowed in 12.04.010 of the Municipal Code. 7. All applications will be reviewed by the City Manager or his/her designee who will have final authority on issuance of any permit, application of associated fees and any special provisions or requests which effect or are affected by the permit process. Provisions for associated Paes shall be developed by the Community Service staff and approved by the Park and Recreation Commission. B. special Provisions: The following conditions are to be met: 1. Before any permit or other authorizing document Se issued for any avant which will produce sounds which may violate this section, the application may be circulated by the Community Service Department to the City Manager, Sheriffs Office and Code Enforcement Bureau, which may attach any pre- epproval conditions to prevent annoying sounds. ~b'7 Nusic and Amplification Policy `rays 2 2. No sound from an Community Services approved event can exceed a noise level (slow, 74dBA, "A" weighted scale) meaaurafl at the nearest property line, for a cumulative period of not more than five {5) minutes in any one hour, whether or not the sounds are live, recorded, amplified or necessary to the event (i.e. generators). 3. in any permitte8 use of a public park the City of Rancho Cucamonga, will provide a City Code Enforcement Officer when music or amplification systems nra used. Tha cost of this service will be bore by the applicant. 4. This sound control officer will work with the permit requestors sound technicians and the authorized permit holder to establish acceptable sound levels during the sound check prior to the start of the activity. B. The cost to provide the Code Enforcement officer will be paid in cash or money order to the community Services Department open approval of the event, The cost to provide this monitor will include time necessary to provide assistance in sound check prior to the event through the cuiw:aati~~ of any music or amplification planned during the permitted ~:ar.± 6. A violation ie defined as: Any noise level which exceeds (slow, 74dBA, ^A" weighted scale), as measured at the nearest property line, for a cumulative period of not more thnn five (5) minutes in any one hour, whether or not the sounds are live, recorded, amplified or necessary to the event. 7. Once the levels have bean established ae designated under Spacial Provisions number a, one warning will be issued without fine. All subsequent warnings and related fines will be consistent with the Municipal Coda of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. a~~ Muria and Amplification Policy Yager 3 Notice of violation shall be given to the person designated on the permit to receive noise level violations. This designated person must be readily available, in a specific pre-designated area, for the sound control representative to inform them they are in violation. Inability to Lind the permittees designated person does not nullify the violation. Authorized representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which shall include but not ba limited to, the Community Services Director, the City rianager, the Sheriff, agents of the Code Enforcement Bureau or any oP their designated representatives, may terminate an activity or performance ns a public nuisance if the decibel level exceeds the herein defined Violation. PES h DBPOSIT SCABDIILS 14usic 0 Amplification Coda Enforcement Officer Fee: $26.75 per hour ~ ~q 1.12.020--1.12.040 ~~ 1.12.020 Per.al C: for misdemeanor. E:<cept i.^. cases where a different pu r.c shment is prescr:ced by any ordinance of the city, a^.y person core icted of a misdemeanor for vio- lation o° this code o: an ordinance of the city, or a..^.y code adopted by reference by ordira nce of the ciey, is punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by im- prsonmeat not to excaed si:< months, or by both scch fine a..^.d imprisonment. (C: 3. 224 §i, 1984: Ord. 114 §1(b), 1o8n~, l .030 Pe.^.a .or :^_racti^ n•i cers o.^. cccr-^___ of ar. ...`r ac uon for ~r .o lauor. cf an^crdica r.ce of the city, or any code adopted t_ reference by ordinance o' the city, is punishable by: A. A fine not esceedinq one hundre3 dollars for a first violation; H. A fine not e::ceeding two hundred dollars for a second violation of t:.e same ordinance or code within one year; and, C. A fine not e::ceedi ng five hundred dollars for each additional violation of the same ordinance or code within one year. (Ord. 224 i2, 1984: Ord. 114 §i(c), 19801. 1.12.040 Each dap of violation deemed separate of- fese. In addition t_ the penalties provided for by this enapter, or elsewhere by ordinance or by any cede adopted by (Rancho Cucam~8fij 12 ~ ~~ 12.03.160--12.04.010 n /l the' mpr~e.^ nt ~f t~e hic4f~ay and a_v recy~ a t::^.e olica- t'_o to con ain a s?fined ~taltement~h~( the)a~pl.i ca. o this eff ct. Th c~i ty engineer shall;sneFi_`f,Cin he mad a rea o able 't ire witl:_n Whic h~ tb0''work oy rz'_bcayion ust be co. aced, ~a. d the ~er~ii ttee'~ mu,~t co ~m~jnce s•~~c`.y`y re'_ooa` ~6n wi .ir: the ~me spe ~ied inly¢he demarK; and t`.terea`_t~i'_i- gently prosecute tie same to completion. (Ord. 218 §2 (part), 1984). io n~ •_-n Uc ld'na c_tv har-it?ss. The aonl_c a.^,` °or a oernyli t, as onditccn toy ece'v c a y~ .,.~ all sica a sta~eme.^.` he ~ees t ind _/ a.c r.o~ arm'ess the c~c•}, a eac of~ c r end emo of e t/.`~e~eor,m a.^, La- bi lj.ty pr res on~ib iFity fGr d~at~h o,f ox(F in p,'ury ,', to ~~ or des~ig.77~ or pe;fo ante of ahy mit' 4tanted nu uan$ to the is 9r 'rr idg as a result~~o -h dertiaken under ary n ion., As add~t~on roH may 'r uire pe-pit ming he cit as coin- the ity engineer. Chanter 12.04 PARK REGULATIONS Sections: 12.04.010 Pazk regulations. 12.04.020 Exereo tions. 12.04.030 Permit procedure adoption. 12.04.040 Pe rrSt issuance for group activities. 12.04.050 Vio:atiort--Penalty. ~1(. 12.04.010 Pa r:< regulations. Except as provided i.n J' this chanter, it shall be unlawful for any person within the limits of acy park cr other recrea clop facility owned or -per attd by «he _~«., to; A. Lead or 1ec loose any animal esceot: 1. Dogs or cats on a Leash which are under the full cort rol of a person, 2. Horses, ponies or the like which are ridden or led on bridle trails or other areas designated for such pur- pose; B. 1. Possess or consume alcoholic beverages. For the 148-7 (Rancho Cucamonga h /~ 12/87) h /~ ;uxaeFl for arbUnts aN established (Ord. 218 §2(part), 1984). 12.04.010 purposes or tats caaoter, the term 'a:ccno uc neverage' cr "a lcohol'ic beverages" shal_ have t:^,e mean i.^.c set forth in Section 2304; of the Ca liforr.ia Bus iaess a..^.d ?rofzsstons Code as the same oresertt'_y exists, or as the sane map be amended from time to time, 2. The city ma..^.acer is directed to cost, or to cause to be posted, as of the effective date o`_ tae ordinance cod~- fied in this section, or noon the later oce.^.ing of ary new city park, at each entrance to such city pa r'.<, a sign stat- i.^.G, subs tac tia117, as follows: "?ossession or co r.s umptio r. cf a'_co he lic be•;e races - Ctp Barks is a misdemeaacr - Rancho Cncamenca Mu.^.°^'-': Code Szttio r. 12.04.010."; C. Enter Or Lemdrn between t:^.E hOllrS Of i0:~~ D.T. d: 6 :OC a.m. of the fe llowiag day except aursuant to an~autho- riaatior. iss.:ed by the city; D. Licit or mairt gin ar.y fire except in a stove, f'_re circle or of ter place provided for that purpose; E. Throw, project or propel any object ca?able of causing ser'_cus personal injury or damage to property excect that basebal:, 6aske tba ll, football and other games where a ball is used may be placed in areas designated for such pur- ocses; F. Par:< or stand any vehicle in other than a desig- nated oarkinc area except pursuant to a permit issued by t.._ city; G. D r_-:e any vehi^le ether ,hag cn r ads, ~re'1- cr driveways provided for that purpose exceotupursuant+to a permit issued by the city; H. Drive any vehicle at a speed in excess of five miles per hear; I. Rice cr use playground equipment posted for use by children under the age of fourteen years unless under the age of £c urteen years; J. Throw, discard, place or dispose o_° any garbage or refuse upon the ground or is any place other than garbage can or other receptacle maintained for such purpose; K. Bring garbage or refuse from outside tae limits of the park or recreation Facility and deposit the same in gar- bage cans or receptacles; L. Ho/d or engage in a musical concert or other musi- cal event wcchout a permit issued by the city; M. Fly fuel Dower driven model airplanes except in areas designated for such purposes; N. Molest, in lure ^r kill any animal or disturb its habitat; y O. PLay any radio, tape recorder or other electronic '/`~ sound-producing device at such volume as to 6e audible at a distance of more than fifty feet; P. Sw im, dive, wade or in any way enter into any pond, lake, water Feature, reflecting pool or any similar body of water. (Ord. 313 S3, 1987; Ord. 258 SS1 and 2, 1985; Ord. 85 §1, 19791. (Rancho Cucamonga 148-8 12/87) ~~ n G.'J ~.J-V -..~~.~J^. 12.04.020 Exemptions. The crova is ns e.: suuecc uur.s C, F and G oP Section 12.04.010 shall not apc Ly to city em- ployees who are engage3 in the per°ormance o: their duties, (Ord. 85 §4, 1979). 12.04.030 Permit crocedure adoption. The community services director may adopt rules and regulations for the 148-Ba IRancho Cucamonga 12/851 ~~3 issuance of any perm_t term fitted he:eu.^.de:. anI such _ce zm_t shall be issued by the community se r:.ces de?artaent. lord, 95 45. 19791. 12.64.040 Permit issuance for arouo activities. The community services depaztmer.t, pursuanc to ;ales anc stan- cards adopted by the community services director, may issue ?e rafts authorizing exclusive temoorary use cf sceci:fed recreational areas for groups desiring to engage~.n speci- ~ied recreational activities. (Ord. 85 46, 13'91. 12.64.050 V'_o la lion--Pena't^. ~. ?.:, •i oe rson encac_nc ^. ar,y activity declared unlawrul by subsacu ens B, J any c'_ Sec t;.on 12.04.010 is guilty of a mademeancr and sha:1 be ?u.^.ished ty imprisonment in the ccuntp 7ai1 for not more than six months or fine not exceeding five hu rd red dollars, or by bock such fine and imprisonment. 148-9 (Rancho Cucamonga 7/84) a ~~- 12.09.010--'_:.08.020 *~~ B. Any pe ron violating any of the provisions c`_ sub- . -- p, c; o. E, F, G, H, 1, :C, L, HI or O of~8ecc:on 12.04.010, after having been once advised that such zccivi C'y is unlawful, is guiity of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months or Eine not exceedin5 five hundred dollars, o= by both S SCh fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 85 §§2, 3, 1979). ~yeoter ie.ua i~ pcpr n' ON OF R' . ^-nr _;v n Section / y2.08.010~~DeClarati ___yyy_y_y_yd-d-d-d-d-d-~ need. / -12.08 .0 St4eets nghways- ecjdcation req~_irement. %12.08 30 Offer o d ication. 12.08~~040 .Const ct~ n of pub is ~mprovemenis--3equire- ~ / ~ ment 12{08.050~~ Con ruction of li¢~improvements--Excep- i /j/ ti s. 2.08.0 AO C str tion o public imnrev a is--additional / quir meats. 12.08.,670 onstXUCtioniagreetfient. j / 12.08.075 ReimlYurseme ~t acrtement fe . i 12.08.084 City stand ds. / i 12.08 .0 yb No k.^.c road ::meat without~ermi~. ~~ is 'ne.~i10 DeclaraKlon of ;need. The l~ek of fu_1 / fronts a .provem nts 7oiriin~t7 a lot or pdreeL occu=ied or to e, ccunied by 'building, st~ucture% or parkirc lot is found and declare ~to be nazardbus for,pedastr s and vehicular traffic aqd detrimeata l.to the health s fety and ge~feral we lfare,~of the residents of the ci y. (Ord. 58 §1~ 1979). i afi no proo~rty/shall hey~eafxer be im ro ea ror paz _ag p rposes, and do building per•.nit shat a issu d erefo , iess ona~half of the stryJet, which," locate tae am ide of the centerline/'o£~the street s such Yo has !/dedicated right-of-way/ f~ the fu11~ idth of k. lot o ~ all street frontages do s to meet '~ a mss to lan as / standar for such syre t. ?a ad'~aion to ~ uired e ica Eor str a 'purposes ,;a ditional d@ station r storrz~~~jjj~~~rair sewer, er ar oth9r tility Pu oses may /$lso be kl4uire in con eytion with lding perm is where ch ded' ation net es to preve the floods of adjacent or n a^by / grope ies or to p 't connection to required utilitie (Ord. 58 S2, 1979). 149 (Rancho Cucamonga 11/82) ass n.oz.lza 8~ A s tement as to where an ind' iduai revie~.u /~ proposedipL~.ns a c late Ilesh / `I ~ri. ' Coy.ti ... f H a ing A' A ~ pub i hea in mapps e contiinueu f ort t m^ t'mE v , e b e o of "ici ndFsc ing Ch ~ head g,', s bj~ct tim t t~n p ovi ed by 1 w ar. in sulc~ ca o ~ th r noti111e ne d he 'vea. rd. 4 gg. and 2y 199'; Ord 211 g ~par3) 17.02.120 Noise abatement. A. Purpose. In order to ~~ co.^.tro1 annecessary, excessive and annoling noise and vi6ra- tior. i.^. t::e city, t is dec'_ared to be tae cc. zo ~ _.._ ci- ~ prohibi` suc'.^. rci se ge.^.eratad fs~.^., e: a1i _curc_s as spec if _ed in ~..is section. )Rancho Cucamonga 258-4 12/84) a~ ~ i-.D2.i20 B. Decibel Measurement Criteria. Anv decibei .reasure- ment made pursua rt to the provisic ns o`_ this sec:'_cn shall be based on a re'_erence sound pressure of t~denty micro- ~.~*-p•ascals as measured with a sound Level met=_r using the "A" weighted network (scale) at s'_ow resner.se. C. Designated Noise Zones, The procerties hereafter described aro hereby assigned the fo1l c,~inc noise zcnes: ~,~* NGZSE ZONE I: A11 single and multip Le-_°amily resider- , ,.i a' prcpertias. NOi$E ZCNE II: A11 commercial pro nerties. ,((~~ ~c D. Exterior Noise Standards. TT 1. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noisy or allow tF.e creation of any noise on the property owned, Leases, occupied, or other- wise controlled by such person, which causes the noise levei when measured on the property line of any other property to exceed the basic noise level as adjuster below: a. Basic noise level for a cumulative period of nct more than fifteen minutes in any one hour; or b. Basic noise level plus five dSA for a cumula- tive period cf not more than ten minutes in any one hour; or c. Basic noise level plus fourteen deA for a ~~~cumulative period of not more than five minutes in any ene hcur; cr d. Basic noise level plus f.f teen dBA at any time. 2. It the measurement locatior, is a boundary be- tween two different noise zones, the lcaer noisy level stan- dard shall apply. 3. Zf the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time pe- riod whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, the measure3 noise level obtained while the noise is in opera- tion shall be ccmoared directly to the allowable noise Level standards as specified respective to the measurement's loca- tion designated land use and for the t_^~e of day the noise level is measured. The reasonableness of temporarily dis- continuing the noise generation by an intruding noise source shall be determined by the city planner for [he purpose of establishing the existing ambient noise level at the mea- surement location. E. Special Provisions. The following activities shall e e::emn red from the orovisinns of rh;s s?coon: 1. City or school approved activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds and public or private school grounds, including, but not limited to, athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of seven a.m. and ten p.m.; 2. Occasional outdoor gatherings, dances, shows, 259 (Rancho Cucamonga 7/84) a~~ _;.az..zo ~~Tand sporting and once rtainment events provided said eve..^.is ~ are co nductze pu rsuaac co the approval pi e Lc6pGrlr •__. permit issued by the city; 3. Ar.y mec^=_nicai device, apcaratus or ecu itmept uses, re t_atzd to or eonnec ted with emergency machinery, ve- hio'.a, wcrk or warnzag alarm or bell provided the sounding o° anv bell or alar^ on anv buildi.^.c or motor veh:c_e snail tz rmiaate its operation within thirty mi ru tes in any hour o` its be inc activated; 4. Noise sc~:: cos associated with or vibration crz- a~ ? by ccnst ruction, repair, remcdeling or cradinc of gay rz a:. property cr du r_ng autho rizzd seismic surveys, crowded sa:3 activlt:.es do r.ct take place between the hours of ecghc p.m. ar.d six-t:^.i rty s.m. on wezicdays, includinc Saturday, or at any time on Sunda: or a national holiday, and provided no isa levels created do not exceed the ncise standard of si:rty-five dBA pLUS the limits specified in subsection D1 of this section; 5. A11 devives, apparatus or equipment associa *_ed with agricultural ocerations provided; a. Ooe:a-ions do not take place between eight p.m. and seven a.m. cn weekdays, including Saturday or at ar.y time on Sunday c- a national holiday, or b. Such :oerations and equipment are utilized for protection or savage of agricultural crops during pe- ricds of potential c= actual frost damage or other adverse weather conditions, cr c. Such operations and equipment are associated with agricultural pest control through pesticide application provided the aoplica=ion is madz in accordance with permits _ r... ,tom .. a,. ea r.., .~,o rat: a.. no meat of Agriculture;- ~~ "'_.._._.. _, ... ... .__.. _. _ ..- fi. Noise scsrces associated with the maintenance of re a. property provided said activities take place between the hours of eight a.m. and eight p.m. on any day except Sunday, or between tte hours of nine a.m. and eicht p.m. on Sunday; 7. Any actb:ity to the extent regulation thereof has been preempted t:: state or federal law. F. Schco ls, Churches, Libraries, Health Care Institu- ticns--Special Provisions. It is unlawful for any person to create any noise which causes the noise level at any school, hospital or similar :.e glib care institution, church, or li- brary while the same is i^ use, to exceed the noise stan- dards speci`_Led in t:>.s section and prescr~hed for the as- sicned noise zone ir, •.~hich the school, hos o_ital, church or ilbCdt•/ ly located. G. Administrat_on. Any act creating or permitting the creation of a noise disturbance as defined by this code, not othe raise excluded by subsection E of this section, shall constitute a violation of this code and shall be abated as such. (Rancho Cucamonga 7/94) 260 a~a 17.02.136 H. Prima Facie Vioiatior.. Any noise exreediac the o; ae level standards far a de si5"at=_d ro tse zone as speci- fied i.^. this seccic.-. _^''! be deemed to be prima facie evi- dence of a violation o.f the provisions o_° this seccivi.. (Crd. 211 y6 (par t(, 19831 17.02.130 N ncortforminc uses and structu re s. r.. Pur- pose. This sect~on is intended t unit the number and ex- tent of noncon rming uses by r _atiag their enlarcement, their reestabJJ shme nt aae_ a orme nt, and the alterat:.oa or re storat'dn after destru~¢ o°_ the strut to r=_s they cc- ricy. Ia a~diticn, th is ise_'.~: is intended to limit the number and~e:<tent of n~qtcor orminc structures by pro',^.ibi_--., their be+ c moved, akfere or en'. arced in a manner t::^at would i. ease the/d.i sc ~~ear.cy betweer. exa ng conditions and th standards' presg4'ibed in this co~~ 1. JK use la~`u11y occupyinq~a sty~uc tune or a site, tha does rtot conf with the us~'regu ~.6tio ns or the site ar a re ~ations or the dis tr32: in w is*. the use is lo- t led .all be d erred to be 3~noncon` rming use and may be on 'rued, exce t as otherwise limi d in this section. 2. A tructu re,~lawfully ctupyinq a site, chat does not con` rm with~he standar s for front yard, side y aids, rear yard, he 3. C, cover e, distances between struc- tures, an parking Yacilities or the district in which tha stzuctur is IocaLed, shaL1 b deemed to be a nonconcorm'_r.y s trot t~~ e and may be used an maintained, exce limited in thi sectio , 3. outine maintenance and repai2s may performed on a~oncogforming use or //structure. C. AlteaoL..G'.= '"~ Additions yd~NOnconfo ming Uses and t uctuy~es. // / 1. No nc nconfdrminq use shall ba a lazged or ex- te ed in such a way bs to ocg+ipy any par` o£ the strsc lure or site or any othe structure or site w .ch it did rot oc- cupy at the time i became a nonc onfo r. ~ng use, or in sucF. a way as to displac any informing use, ccupyinq a lure or site, except s pe itted in this section. ~ 2. No onto orming struct re shall ~be alte d or reconstruc Ced o a to increase t discr~ney bet een existing cond ti s artd the start ards ~e'r front y d, side yards, rear , height of str ctur , distance bet•.~een structures and paz king fat ill es prescribed in the recu- lations for the district in is the structu is 1oc D. Discontinuation o No onfo rm ing Us whe er a oncnnformirg vse has bee c nged to a con ormi use or has been discontinued fo icon*.inuous per'od~ one hurt ed eighty days or more, the nonconforming use ~t(a 11 noC be "e~ estab fished, and the use of the structur r site then after shall be in conformity with the regulations for the strict in which it is located; provided, that this section shall 261 (Rancho Cucamonga 5/861 a~~ 17.08.080 and ad~oininq to y a legall ecuiva ent scr ni^ 3, otwit tandin tt and 2 of t s subs ction emex short'y-`erg, or tem~orary/parkic veyahces when own d b~i'a pers/! con uc d for an aag egate p/Ff in ~n~ continuo p~iod Yo f/ F/enc~e, wall, or .'c 6f subdiv ision5 1 ncy of .u of ahY of *p w .. ....: - nnr~ exc lu th¢ ~re ~ninFO~p i=e Purpo o this se ti n, r=~=- I / # meanin5 defi d < are t~ks of cony a czs steal ve t whe sucn deli --^ in the Gehicl ode of th ari)te 19831. ` ov~/a~i lab'_e. ( rd. 21. 461p '1``71~ 17.Og,p80 Performance standards. A. Intent. T e .L 'F rotect properties is all rzsi- "intent of this section is to P rovide a pleas- dential districts and the health and safety of. persons from environmental nuisanceslnndwithathe nature of the residen- ing environment in keep' 9 tial character. The perfocmance standards set maximum to - erability limits on adverse environmental effects creaeed by any use or development o£ land. Lanner. Upon B. Administration and Measurement. The standards of this section shall be enforced 6t' the city p a atant violation of these standards, the discovery of any PP the viola- city planner shlflalvio la t9 one issfoundu to existuments as ma be necessary. rescribed in this tion shall be abated as a nuisance as p code. C~a.Em thelprovisicnsf oflthisgsec bons of nuisances a ....i.i n1P4 and devices; `°c~`- 1 Emergency equipw=„" •-••- or aemoii- 2, Temporary construction, maintenance, tion activitezcebtt5undayseand nationalxholiday sa'm. and eight p.m., p eration or activity shall cause any y~ p, Noise. NO °p Location or allow the creation of -~`~ource of sound at any leased, occupied, or otherwise con- noise on property owned, trolled by such person, whicF. causes the aunde as conta inede levels to exceed the following standards, in Section 17.02.120• (Rancho Cucamonga 7/84) 272-72 ~VQ Ii.O8.C80 TABLE 17.08.O80C -- R_SIDE`TI?.I NCISB STANDARDS Maximum Allowable Location of Measurement 10 p.m. to 7 a.m, 7 a.m. to 1C o.m. ~~L~ 1. Exterior 55 dBA 60 deA ''11~~ 2. Interior 40 dBA 45 dBA ~- Notes: a. It is unlawful for any perscn at any locaticn wit'.'.^.in the city to create any noise or to allow the creat'_on o'_ any noise which causes the noise level when measured within any other fully enclosed (windcws and doors shu tl resi- dential dwelling unit to exceed the interior noise stan- dard in the manner described herein. b. If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, the same procedures specified in Section 17.02.120 sha 11 be deemed proper to enforce the provisions of this section. c. Each of the noise Limits above shall be reduced five dBA for noise consisting of impulse or simple tone noise. 3. Special Noise Provisions. a. Peddlers--Use of Loud Ncise, Etc., to Adver- tise Gcods, Etc. No paddler cr mobile vendor or any aerson in their behalf shall shout, cry out, or use any device or instrument to make sounds for the purpose of advertising in _:-h m=nnar as to create a noise disturbance, b. Animal Noises. No person owning or Having the charge, care, custody, or control of any dog, or other animal or fowl shall allow or permit Che same to habitually howl, bark, yelp or make other noises, in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance, c. Aad ios, Television Sets, Musical Instruments ~F and Similar Devices. No person shall operate or permit the operation or playing of any device which reproduces, pro- duces or amplifies sound, such as a raft io, musical instru- ment, phonograph, or sound amplifier, in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance as listed in Table 17.OB.O80D: i. Across any real property boundary or with- in Noise Zone I, between the hours of ten p.m. and seven a.m. on the following day (except for activities for which a temporary use permi< is needed as prescribed in Section .~.,.,.0', Of 7 ii, At fifty feet (fifteen meters) from any such device, if operated on or over any public right-of-way, E. Vibration. No vibration shall be permitted which can be felt with or without the aid o£ instruments at or beyond the lot line. 272-73 (Rencho Cucamonga 7/84) ag I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6~ 1988 TO: Mayor, Memb ere of the City Council and City Manager PROM: Mark R. Lorimer: Sr. Admire iatrative Aae is tent 1/}yQt,Ci SUBJECT: GTE DIRECTORY LHTTER At the time the City Council agenda was prepared the letter Concerning future telephone directory deaigaatione had noC been completed. The letter should be forwarded to the City Council in time for action on April 6. Rowevera if the City and GIE cannot yet reach agreement on the contents of the letter by the City Council meet ing~ staff may request this item be oontinued. The Ci[y Caunc it will receive a copy of the completed letter when it is prepared. lEtl./d j a TD 2- CITX OF RANCHO Cl'CAMONGA STAFF R.EPOItT Date: 70: From: By: Sub~ett: April 6, lybn City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Paul A. Rougeau, City Traffic Engineer ~1 ~~ W Student Parking Alternatives 1n the Vicinity of Alta Loma Nigh School It is recommended that a portion of the space in the north and central parking lots of Red Hill Community Park be made available to Alta Loma High School students on a conditional one month trial basis. If no titter or vandalism problems arise, then permanent use of the space would be permitted. BAClcsrown/Aiw.rsls: In response to a request by the Cfty Council at its March 2, 1988 meeting, a parking study was conducted for Aita Loma High School. Student parking in the vicinity of the schooi on public streets was inventoried on March 10, 11, 14, and 15. An average of bb stuaenc veBicl2s ~,,: ^'^'!^4 parked on public streets. The streets impacted are Vineyard Avenue south of Base Line Woad, Ironwood Street east of Vineyard Avenue, and Garnet Street north of Base Line Road. In addition to street parking, it appears that the front of the Stater Bros. parking lot is being parked in by students. The parking lots far Lhe Red Hill Community Park were also inventoried. The north parking lot had a high of 18 parked vehicles and a low of none. These vehicles appeared to belong to non-students, since there was some park usage. No vehicles were parked in the middle tot. The north lot contains 78 regular and 3 handicap parking spaces. The mid-lot contains 119 regular and 4 handicap spaces. Since the parking tots for the park are only being partly utilized and overflow student parking is occuring on residential streets, it is appropriate to recommend ariowing student parking in the parking lots of the park under the following conditions: 1) reserve one-half of the north parking lat far public use (39 spaces) and the other half for students (39 spaces); 2) in the middle lot reserve 20 spaces for the public and the remaining 99 for students; a~ CCSR Re: Parking Study - ALMS Aprti 6, 1988 Page 2 3) that the students refrain frar littering and cause no vandalise in or to the parking tots: 41 that no students park on public streets in the vicinity of the school, except for the west side of Vineyard Avenue. This recasendatlon provides for 138 student parking spaces. It has been discussed with the Alta Lora Righ School principal, who concurs with the conditions and w111 infore Lhe students of the plan and their obligations under it, if adopted. During a one eonth trial period, City forces can eonltor catptiance and determine if conditions are being let. If problees occur which cannot be retedied by City staff and the school adetnistration, then Tt will be recowiended to the C1ty Council at Its May 18 eeettng that lirited Lire or perwit parking be installed as necessary an surrounding streets and that the park be again posted for all 1lrtted Lire parking during the day. Respec ly subtitled, f RNM: AR: Attachrents age. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: March 17, 1988 To: Paul A. Rougeau, Ctty Traffic Engineer From: Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer Sub,)ect: Parking Study in Vicinity of Alta Loma High School In response to a request by the City Council at their March 2, 1988 meeting, a parking stuQy was conducted for Alta Lama High School. Student parking in the vicinity of the school on public streets was inventoried on March 30, il, 14, and 15. An average of 66 student vehicles were found parked on public streets. The streets impacted are Vineyard Avenue south of Base Line Road, Ironwood Street east of Yineyard Avenue, and Garnet Street north of Base Line Road. In addition to street parking, it appears that the front of the Stater Bros. parking lot is being parked in by students. The parking lots for the Red Hill Community Park were inventoried at the same time. The north parking iot had a high of 18 parked vehicles to a low of 0. These vehicles appeared to belong to non-students, since there was some park usage. No vehicles were parked 1n the middle lot. The north lot contains 78 regular and 3 handicapped parking spaces. The mid-lot contains 119 regular and 4 handicapped spaces. Since the parking lots for the park are only being Dartly utilized and overriow scuaenc parxing is occuring on residential streets, it is appropriate to recommend assigning student parking to the parking lots of the park given certain conditions. Those conditions would be to 1) reserve one-half of the north parking lot for public use (39 spaces) and the other half for students (39 spaces); 2) in the middle lot reserve 20 spaces for the public and the remaining 99 for students; 3) that the students cause ~w vandalism in or to the parking lots; 4) that no students park an public streets in the vicinity of the school, except for the west side of Vineyard Avenue. This recommendation provides for 138 student parking spaces. In the event that students still park in residential areas, the City may install 2 hour parking zones in the effected resldentlal areas. Another option would be developing residential parking only districts, which can be done by City Council Ordinance or Resolution. There will be City expense. The parking lots will need to be divided and signed for public and student parking areas, If one of the options is used, there will be additional signs and, perhaps, the time necessary to develop an Ordinance for resldentlal parking only and its implementation. aP5 March 17, 1988 Fras: Chuck Mackey Re: Parking StuQy ALHS Page 2 The parking use of the City park parking lot should be Bade conditional. The public parking needs should be reviewed, as required, and appropriate adJustsents Bade. A sodest fee say be appropriate for the use of City property. G+~ p~ a~6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M~MO~ANDUM Date: March 10, 1988 To: Lauren Masserean, City Manager 2 ,~~y/fy~/,.//~ FraM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer//~y~' I By: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer „(( Subject; Parking Study 1n Vicinity of Alta Luau Nigh School At the March 2, 1988 Council aKeting, staff was directed W assess the iapact of high school student parking on rcsldentlal streets 1n the school area. Because of the bate involved to the field work and in writing the re rir it will not be possible to peke the March 16 sleeting, but we could be done for the April 6 nearing. This is to confln that the study is in progress with the intent to sveet that schedule. It is expected fran prelinlnary rcvlew, that there will be siynlfleant enough parking is>Paction that we will recaa~end the re-opening of the Red N111 Park parking lot to students by resgval of the ltwtited tine parking restriction. We will Hake preliainary contact with the Aita Lane High School principal prior to Apr11 6, regarding a trial period for the parking in the park. RMM:PAR:pam ~~~ /ii T ll A AIliLilA /~i i!'~ A Al hTili A STAFF REPORT ~~''., °i~` z Fi U LL > 1977 ~ DATE: April 6, 19P8 T0: City Manager and City Council i FROM: Mark R. Lorimer ~~/ Sr. Administrative Aes ie ta¢t SUBJECT: Reeo lotion Regue etin¢ Pire Die tr ict Reor¢an iz anon RBCOMlEUDATIW: It ie recommended that the City Council: 1) adopt a resolution requea Ling the Local Agency Pormatioa Commis eion to take proceedinge for the eetab liehment of the Pooth ill Pire Protection District ae a subsidiary district of [he Ci[y of Rancho Cucsmonga~ 2) direct ate Ef to prepare the eeceseary application materia le, and 3) authorize the payment of application Eeee in the amount of $1,000 to LAPCO. I1IPORMASIOM: In order for Che Ci[y end the Foothill Fire Protection District to begin proceedinge for the formation of a subsidiary fire dia tr is t, it is necessary for both agent iee to adopt similar reeo lntione requesting each action of the Local Age ¢cy Formation Commission. Under the Cor [sae-Rao: Local Government Reorgen iz etion Act of 1985 the City end Fire District msy ~.. ..~:-~:..e .. t..~: m. of oemonecra ce ice inceuc w iucr a e a:r d - .. .,~ ,. ___ _ initiation and submitting proper uepp lication forme and Eeee to LAP CO. The review proce se conducted by LAFCO inc lodes the following: 1. LAFCO receives reeo lotion of initiatio¢ and application materials 2. LAPCO prepares notice of filing aed mails to all affected public b odies~ the County Ae eeeaor~ end County Auditor/Controller 3. The ieeue ie submitted tha ieeue for enviroemental review bq the County 8nviromentsl Analye in Section etaf£ 4. The Departmental Rev iaw Committee (made up of all County deper [meats/egeeciee affected by the proposal) comments on Che submittal 5. LAPCO ezecutive officer prepares and die tr ibutee fiml report sad makes recommendations for Co®ie sion ec [ion 6. LAPCO reviews and approves or denies the proposal 7. If approved by the Commieeion~ the City and Fire Die trio would consider reorganization to a eubaid inry dia tr ict on en official agenda and approve or deny wch ec lion X88 Aeaolu tion Requesting Aire Die trio Aeorganizatim April 6, 1988 Page 2 8. If approved by local agent iee~ the LAFCO clerk files a certificate of completion and announces the effective date of Che reorgmization It ehould be noted that the City and Die trio will have final approval of the reorganization and may terminate the ee tab lishmeat after consideration by the Commie eion. At th ie preliminary etage~ it i9 necessary fox the City Council to adopt the aetached rasa lu [ion requee ting LAFCO to take proceedioge for the eetab liehment o£ [he aubaid iazy din tr is t. In addiCion~ the City Council ehould direct staff to prepare the necessary application materials end authorize the payment of applicatimn fees in Che amount of $1,000 to IAFCO. Should you have any questions or comments regarding th ie iseue~ please feel free to contact me or Lauree. 1TxL:bae attachment e: Reeo lotion X39 ~-~~ ABSOLUTION N0, gd'-~ A ABSOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA CALIFOBNIA~ REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY POBMATION CONNISS ION TO TARE YAOCBEDINGS FOR TAE BSTABLISHNENT OF TEE FOOTHILL FIEF PROTHCTION DISTRICT AS A SUBSIDIAEY bISTAICT OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA 4MEREA9~ the Citq of Rancho Cucamonga desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorgania atioo Act of 1985. Division 3~ commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the eatabliahmen[ of the Foothill Fire Protection Die trio as a 9ubaidiary d ietrict of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and WBERBAS~ the territory proposed [o be served is inhabited a¢d a description of the boundaries of the territory ie ee[ forth i¢ Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein and WHEREAS, this proposal ie conais ten[ with the sphere of influence of the affected city and dietric t7 arcl WHBREAS~ the reasons for this proposed sub eidiazy die trio are ae follows: 1. Provide [he moat coat eE£e<tive end efficient fire protection aervicee to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Y. Leaeeu t firr.¢c: •1 rnnetrainte a¢d burden of epee ial district augmentation funds and [he effects of Propoattion i~ u.. t.... ____ protection service budget. 3. Provide an efficient system to encourage Euture planning of fire aervicee to meet the future needs of the co®unity. NOWT THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby requests the Loeel Agencq Formation Comaie aion of Sen Bernardino County to take proceedings for tha eetabliehment of the Foothill Fire Protection Die trio ae m evbeid fiery dish ict of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Enox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. PASSED AYPROVED~ and ADOPTED bq the City Council of the Citq of Rancho Cucamonga by [he fallowing vote: AYES: NOESi ABSHNT: X90 EXHIBIT "A" VICINITY MAP _._. _._.t r_., ~._._._.. :.? ~.? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~- IY „T. „ ..,...,. ,. Vll l VL' LVL]3'I V L1V VUVAlL1V1YVA STAFF REPORT ~~;_ C LL F $ ~ J D 1977 DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman SUBJECT: COMfIISSIOM YgCAMCI ES With the recent resignations of Robert Dutton from the Public Safety Commission and Peter Pitassi from the Park and Recreation Commission, the City Council should discuss the way in which you wish to fill vacancies for these key positions. Staff is available to assist you if you desire. LMW/d ja 88-142 AGENDA aai ROBERT D. DUTTON 9617 Cerrori Coun Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 March 23, 1988 The Honorable Mayor Stout and Members of City Council City of Raneho Cucamonga ~~ <~ ,_ 0'5 ~ ~'^ I have recently receivM a memorandum from Lauron Wesssrmsn in roference to an opinion by the City Attorney, lames Markrnan, with regard m conflict of intergt an the part of commissioners. 1 have discussed at length with lames Markman, my businsss involvement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and alto my involvement with building a full facility XMCA. Although a conflict of interest may not exist at this lima, 1 feel it u in the beat interest of the ...n .t,. r•:«, eqr m. t.r o-nd~r my retianation from the Public SHCety Commission effective immediately. It is with the deepest regrets that I must take this action If sometime in the future the regulations of the Fair Political Practice Commission are changed, I would be more than happy to make myself available to assist you and the City Council in whatever role you feel necessary. Sincer ly, Bert . D tto~W~ a°~ z- March i7, 1988 Pitassi•Dalmau A~wz~.~' Honorable Mayor Dennis Stout and members of the City Councit Peter~.Pltoa~,.n.ia Arcnttecf City of Rancho Cucamonga aom ooimcu.nin. P. 6. Box 807 nfcndecr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mayor Stout and Council members: During the past two weeks I have had several discussions with yourself, City Attorney Jim Markman and Council member Buquet regarding the content of the City Manager's memo dated March I4, 1988. In essence the memo states that a City commissioner or conmittee member is deemed to be using his or her position to "influence" the Planning Commission or City Council if they appear before that body to advocate for or against an issue in which they have a business interest. As an Architect, one of my primary responsibilities is to represent my Client throughout the approval process. It would 6e professional irresponsibility if I were not capable of performing this service to the best of my ability. The content of the memo referred to above precludes me from fulfilling this portion of my professional responsibility on any projects within Rancho Cucamonga. o< vnu know, 1 have been involved in the city process as of ther an .Advisory Comm ssioner or a 7e~6s ,:-d°.^x ^•ar inn Commissioner since 1962. I have served on the Design Task Force for both the Red Writ and Heritage Community Parks as well as our Central Park. In this period of almost six years I have appeared before the Planning Commission and the City Council on a number of occasions. In these appearances my representati or, has been regarding design issues and discussion of the planning or architectural design elements of a particular project. Considering my po sitidn as a Commissioner, at no time has there been even a suggestion that my representation before the Planning Commission or City Council was improper. In contrast, at no time have I or anyone else ever received the impression that my position has influenced a decision in either direction. Under *-he nuidel fines outlined in Jim Markman's memo, if I desire to continue practicing Arc hitec *.u re in Rancho Cucamonga, I cannot prone rly fulfill my professional responsibilities while serving as a Parks and Recreation Commissioner. aq 3 9267 Haven Avenue, SuMe 220 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 01730 • (714) 98i}+361 Honorable Mayor Dennis Stout and members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga March 17, 1988 Page 2 I have received a great deal of personal satisfaction from my involvement in the government process. I have learned a great deal and I hope in same small way I have contributed. I am very proud of our accomplishments in the field of Parks and Recreation and I think Rancho Cucamonga has much to be proud of. However, after my distussi ons with yourself and a great deal of thought, I must offer my resignation. I very much desire to continue building my practice in Rancho Cucamonga, however, if I am not able to discuss design issues at the Planning Commission or City Council level I cannot property perform nU' responsi bilTties as a professional. I sincerely appreciate the confidence you have shown ih me by appointing me to this position and i regret any Tnconvenience my resignation may impose. If you desire further discussion on this matter, please advise for i look forward to your response. Sincere Pit • D r it is ' a si, A.I.A. Arc hitec PJP:sgd cc: lau ren Wasserman Bob Rizzo Members Park and Rec re anon Commission aq~h CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COIMISSION MISSION STATEMENT c~Mo i ~ ~~ ~~ s ~~~ r I9 JiL ~ J> i9n I I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve a sslon Statement for Historic Preservation as amended. II. BACKGRWND: At the January 20, 1988 regular City Council meeting, ounl~er Nrlght requested that consideration be given on development of a Historic Preservation Mission Statement and that this item be placed on a future City Council agenda for discussion. This Mission Statement is very similar to the Mission Statement prepared as part of the City Council's recent goal setting sessions. A draft of the Mission Statement for Historic Preservation was reviewed by Lhe City Council on February 17, 1988 and referred to the Historic Preservation Commission for their The draft Mission Statement was presented to the Historic Preservation Commission on March 3, 1988. During their review, they added the wards "landscapes, streetscapes, and districts" to mophasize that their mission goes beyond identification and preservation of Isolated historic sites. They also added "and awareness of" to broaden the purpose of educational programs and events. Their changes can be seen Tn the following draft. COMINITT VALUES TIE CITY OF RAMCHD CUCANOIRIA ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION We, the members of the City Council, City Commissions, and Prafessionai Staff of the City of Rancho Cucamonga are dedicated to the protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of structures and sites of historic, architectural, and engineering significance located within the City which are of cultural and aesthetic benefit to the community. Ne believe that the economic, cultural and aesthetic standing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be enhanced by representing the heritage of the City through its commitment to: clrr cauwcn srAFF REPaRr RE: HPC MISSION SiATEMENi April 6, 1988 Page 2 Designate, preserve, protect, enharrce, and perpetuate those historic structures, landscapes, streetscapes, districts and sites which contribute to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of the City of Rancho Cucaamnga. Foster civic pride in and arreness of the beauty and acccaplishnents of the past by estabilshing adequate educational progress and events which will make the public aware of the valuable heritage which ezlsts to the City. Stabilize and improve the econanfc value of historic structures, landscapes, streetscapes, districts and sites by educating the property owners of sucA sites as to the 1ahiVIY~M[At improved property values and tax incentives for the preservation of such property. Protect and enhance the City's culturai and aesthetic heritage and encouraging both public, as well as private participation 1n all aspects of both funding rehabilitation efforts and educational awareness programs. Promote and encourage continued private ownersAlp in the rehab111tatton and maintenance of such buildings, other structures, landscapes, streatseapes, districts and sites now GO OMIM llnA ue~A to ~M~ t..l l~~t ~n ~wi~t yi~sai~ic uiiue, Nle objectives previously listed. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:LH:ko a~ ~ CDIMIMITY YALUES nE cm aF lurcxo aicnioic~ ax xtstaxic rnESFxrenax xe, the webers of the City Council, City Caawdsslons, and Professional Staff of the City of Rancho Cucasanga are dedicated to the protection, enhancea~ent, perpetuation, and use of structures and sites of historic, architectural, and engineering significance located within the City which are of cultural and aesthetic benefit to the cowawJnity. Me believe that the econaadc, cultural and aesthetic standing of the City of Rancho Cucaronga x111 be enhanced by representing the heritage of the City through Tts co~aitaient to: Designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and Derpetuate those historic structures, landscapes, streetacapes, districts and sites which contribute to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of the City of Rancho Cucuaonga. Foster civic pride in and awareness of the beauty and accaapltshamnts of the past by estaDlishing adequate educational pragra~s and events which will arke she Wb11c aware of the valuable heritage which exists 1n the City. Stabilize and i*prove the econaalc value of historic structures, landscapes, streetscapes, districts and sties by educating the property owners of such sites as to the iagroved property values and tax incentives for the preservation of such property. Protect and enhance Lhe City's cultural and aesthetic heritage and ern.uu,ayiry S~tl: ; ~lic, ac well es orlvate partlcipatlon in all aspects of Doth funding rehabilitation efforts and educational awareness progra~s. Praaate and encourage continued private ownership in the rehabilitation and wlntenance of such buildings, other structures, landscapes, streeticapes, districts and sites now so owned and used to the fullest extent possible under the ob~ectlves previously listed. Approved by the City Caunctl on this 7th day of Apr11, 1988. ~J^ 1 f :~~e~1'ILLIAVI LYON~~~ir~aoz~ 8540 ARCHIRALD, SL'I;E u, kgNCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 (714) 980-2444 April O5, 1988 Mr. Lauren Wasserman CICy MandRe[ City of Rancho Cucamonga P.U. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-0807 Dear Lauren: I would like co take this opportunity to express the support of The William Lyon Company for [he Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga to establish a subsidiary Fire District. Please noc ify me of any information or assistance our company can provide [o support the establishment of [he subsidiary Fire Dts[ric t. soec fully, ~_~FrC~ en9 Ford / ~~ Project N,anag~ SF/ra REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT --CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: gpril 6, 1988 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Amending Map, Tract No. 10827-2, located south of Wilson Avenue, between Haven and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by Mira Mar Land Company, Incorporated, A California Corporation, and U.S. Homes Corporation, a Delaware Corporation RECOMENMTION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Amending Map, Tract No. 10827-2, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said maD to record, Background/Analysis Tract No. 10827-2, located south of Wilson Avenue, between Haven and Hermosa Avenues, was approved by Cfty Council on April 16, 1986, and rornrdad nn May 1 lON6 Phan Inc in fhn lnf linnc nF •ho approved at Design~Review on May 13, 1987. The developers, Mira Mar Lang Company, Incorporated, A California Corporation and U.S. Homes Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, are submitting the amending map at this time. Respec u fitted, ' % ~ ~ ~~~~~ / ~' i/ - ~~ RHM:LBad Attachment W'lvon /'T /e nuB v a tl h 0 U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENaII~7EEKIIYO DMBION 14M ~ u a u u a ~V N fin- Amending Tract 1082]-2 +++LCr_ EXH~IT: RFSQI IIT TnN Nn, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDING MAP TRACT N0. 10827-2 WHEREAS, the Amending MaD of Tract No. 10827-2, consisting of 100 lots, submitted by Mira Mar Land Company, Incorporated, A California Corporation, and U.S. Homes Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Subdividers, located south of Nilson Avenue, between Haven and Hermosa Avenues, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdividers far approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Rct of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, the original Tract Map No. 10827-2 was aDProved by the City an June 17, 1987, as Resolution No. 86-94 and recorded on May 1, 1986, Book 188 pages 79 thru 83; and NHEREAS, the developers have made a significant number of changes of lot lines to accommodate specific housing units; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Amending Map of said Tract said subdividers submit for approval said Amending Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ranchn r.l:ramnnna. f.alifnrnia that thn nfFnre fr,r AnA:rat:nn ,~,1 rho eme,.n_;..,. Map delineating same are hereby approved and the City Clerk is authorized tom execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City and record said map. _, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 6, 1988 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FR:M: Taa 6rahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 87-18 - 1101E FEDERAL The applicant has requested that Variance 87-18 be continued to the April 20, 1988 City Council meeting. Staff rlCOwaends that the City Council continue the appeal. R~`pectfully su fitted, I ~~;~tiA`~ 1~1 Ton 6rahn Assistant Planner TG:,I s cc: Brad Buller Otto Kroutil Dan Col man Attachment: Letter fron Applicant April 6, 1988 Mc. Tom Grahn CITY OP RANCHO CUCARONGA Planning Dapa[tment 9320 Baas Lina Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Re: Yarianea 187-18/Home Pedecnl Appael Dear TOm~ Du• to una voidable scheduling conflicts. I'd like to request that the appenl of variance f87-1B be continued to the next available agenda. Thank vnn Inr vm,r nnA~rahenAlnn •n.1 ___r _C _•_1 _.^._ CuCt A. Bauer ACCOU nt Executive CAB/dmd tmena WMEATL4N09 AVE.. 94fTE O, 9ANTFF, pA~IFGFlIWQ 00071 ~g 19~ gyl+-A2Cx] 331NHi 39W• ZO-d Ji:`t 8~~'tip•"~) ?£80 .9s ctv WOdi ~731111d 4itltll REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT • REAPPORTIONMENT AND REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS ASSBSSM'civT DISTRIi:P NO. 86-2 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously confirmed assessments in n specinl assessment district pursuant to the terms and pzovisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costs for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of snid code, said Special Assessment District known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 Subsequent to the confirmation, cartnin lots and/or parcels of land upon Which there ere unpaid assessments have bean merged and divided and the unaereignad, ae Superintendent of Streets, has apportioned the unpaid amount of said installments, all as authorized by Part 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", specifically commencing with Section 8730 thereof, of the Streets and Highways Code of the • State of California. The undersigned, as Superintendent of Straats, Boas herewith submit the Following report, setting forth the Following: Exhibit A: Listing of aegregntion and reapportionment of assessments r P ENDENT •T CITY OF O CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONGA THIS DAY OF , 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DID, FOLLOWING A PUBLIC HEARING, CONFIRM AND MODIFY THE ASSESSMENTS AS SET FORTH • HEREIN ON THE DDY QF 1, oPn. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THIS DAY OF , 1988. SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, • THE DAY OF 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA y EXHIBIT "A" REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT Parcel Description Unpaid Assessment (Assessor's Description) Assessment Amount Number Book/Page/Parcel Amount Remaining 387 201-271-71 $27,444.97 $26,787.23 388 201-271-72 22,826.28 22,281.79 AMENDED ASSESSMENT Parcel Description Assessment IASSessor's Descripiionl Number Book/Page/Parcel 387-1 Parcel 9, LLA 87-370139 387-2 Parcel 10, LLA 87-370139 . Total •Inaicates the unpaid assessment rema after the 1987/88 tax bill has been delinquencies if any). Unpaid Assessment Amount Amount Remaining $14,607.55 $14,257.47 35,665.70 31,810.95 $50,273.25 "$49,068.42 ~n>.ng agains< cne prupnc~cy paid (does not include • • AMENOEO O/AGRAM ASSESSMENT D/STR/CT NO. 8G-2 Lnr w~ ~.vo cLr~.an«sw LOUNIY aF S.IN B!'.OYMLK1t0 STwia w LfLlF[WNa .`w uioca~ c ~..: u ~~` ma ar n. rn.n l`IIp V W WMCYp m~T'. fMV~4 Q t Sf ~Nf~ ry^;' ~ + I ~'j • ... ... _. ;. ~.. . ~ f i ~ n ~.iw wws ...w w- wii, r.n o. ^ Ft z _ \ '' j ~ MA.~6~ L i0 N~ 8 { 4~~ 9 - ~~~ fa ly1 i ~a'~: o~w ~~+~ ~jy~\ 5 ~N F~ I i / ~~~ r P~ 1 % ; I ~ ~ ` l rl.~ yvp M-`~ _. l ,,..a . =~.. - --'~ -y ~ w ~ _ J -. - gym- - ',~.,. .°~ ~ „°• ~~ HIGIiAI\D LVEh~(.E Cf6ENG: O ... rwrtrore ..~. wMS~ !! +r~wa .~~ur~r Fuca wry ~ \~ . r- eson... a.r+.. ut .u,n~crr wv w~~~ ~ n a ... y w ~~n a ..a o~ . ~ u v ' : ~ • ~ _ ~ ~. w e m r n~m~a .rra~ ~e .a. ° ~ w t ~ ° ~ ~rsr o . : m w r.~mm~".m~a o~.s `` ~ ~ ~ woounc ~ ~ W/ i. ~ ,. ' NV% +' .r~~ ~ . - ' ' b [. M~ 1 .. s.. m . ti+ 1 , a I ~l PA.ILfL ~ N ii• ,q~ > rui:'i•cT.' 'a'uti~N a~n u wou w..~, ri4'FR-_-._ uu u w.o .~cvm. REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT REAPPORTIONMENT AND REDISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSMENTS • ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 86-2 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously confirmed assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and bonds were issued to represent the costa for unpaid assessments pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said code, said Special Assessment District known anfl designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2 Subsequent to the confirmation, certain lots and/ar parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments have been apportioned or divided and the undersigned, as Superintendent of Streets, has apportioned and segregated the unpaid amount of said installments, all as authorized by Fart 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", specifically comnencing with Section 8730 thereof, of the Streets and Highways Code of the • State of California. The undersigned, as Superintendent of Streets, does herewith submit the Following report, setting forth the following: Exhibit w: La ti :g ~s segregation and reapportionment of assessments r --~-v =7' R •NDENT SETS CITY OF CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THIS DAY OF 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA I DO HEREEY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, DID, FOLLOWING A PUBLIC HEARiy~. f,,^belKii AND MODIFY THE ASSESSMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN ON THE pAY OP 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THIS DAY OF 1988. SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, • THE DAY OF 1988. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA • u EXHIBIT "A" REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT Assessment Number 10 101 Parcel Description (Assessor's Desc riptionl Hook/Page/Parcel 201-271-47 201-271-77 Unpaid Assessment Amount Amount Remaining $ 6,059.89 $ 5,914.66 183,232.23 178,841.12 AMENDED ASSESSMENT • Assessment Number 10A Unpaid Assessment Amount Amount Remaining S 2,918.05 $ 2,877.40 Parcel Description (Assessor's Description) Book/Page/Parcel " 201-271-47 SEE ATTACHED "Original Assessor Parcel Number, Will be changed with the assignment of the new numbers. • AMENDED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT PARCEL DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AMOUNT NUMBER TRACT NUMBER/LOT AMOUNT REMAINING 101-1 TRACT 12873 LOT 1 $1,689,52 $1,649.01 101-2 TRACT 12873 LOT 2 $1,333.42 $1,301.45 101-3 TRACT 12873 LOT 3 $1,701.66 $1,661.09 101-d TRACT 12873 LOT 4 $1,701.88 $1,663.09 101-5 TRACT 12673 LOT 5 $1,612,01 $1,573.36 101-6 TRACT 12873 LOT 6 $2,645,68 $2,582.08 101-7 TRACT 12873 LOT 7 $2,351.17 $2,296.82 101-8 TRACT 12873 GOT 8 $1,687.27 $1,666.83 101-9 TRACT 12873 LOT 9 $1,957.99 $1,913.07 101-30 TRACT 12873 LOT 10 $1,404.38 $3,370.53 101-11 TRACT 12873 LOT 11 $1,521.01 $1,484.56 101-12 TRACT 12873 LOT 32 $1,691.76 $1,651.22 101-13 TRACT 12873 LOT 13 $1,701.87 $1,681.09 101-14 TRACT 12873 LOT ll $1,701.87 93,661.09 101-15 TRACT 12873 LOT 15 $3,799.60 $3,756.47 101-16 TRACT 12873 LOT 16 $1,940.02 $1,893.53 101-17 TRACT 12873 LOT 17 $1,530.00 $1,493.33 101-18 TRACT 12873 LOT 18 $1,606.39 $1,567.89 101-19 TRACT 12873 LOT 19 $1,740.06 $1,898.36 101-20 TRACT 128'73 LOT 20 $1,558.06 $1,520,74 101-21 TRACT 12873 LOT 21 $3,606.39 $1,567.89 101-22 TRACT 12873 LOT 22 $1,514.27 $1,477.98 101-23 TRACT 12873 LOT 23 $1,586.17 $1,546.15 101-24 TRACT 12673 LOT 24 $1,636.72 $1,597.49 ivi-2u 1'nwu'1' 12 tl'!3 LU'1' 25 $1,605.26 $1,566.79 101-26 TRACT 12673 LOT 26 $1,519.89 91,463.46 101-27 TRACT 12873 LOT 27 $1,416.54 $1,352.59 101-28 TRACT 12873 LOT 28 $1,660.31 $1,620.52 101-29 TRACT IT873 LOT 29 $1,431.14 $1,396.85 101-30 TRACT 12873 LOT 30 $1,358.13 $1,325.58 101-31 TRACT 12873 LOT 31 $2,073.70 $2,024.00 101-32 TRACT 12873 LOT 32 $2,288.26 $2,233.42 101-33 TRACT 12673 LOT 33 $2,547.75 $2,466.89 101-34 TRACT 12873 LOT 36 $1,500.79 $1,464.83 101-35 TRACT 32873 LOT 35 $3,577.18 $3,539.38 101-36 TRACT ST873 LOT 36 $1,701.87 $1,663.09 101-37 TRACT 12873 LOT 37 91,624.36 $1,585.43 101-38 TRACT 12873 LOT 38 $1,716.47 $1,675.34 101-39 TRACT 12873 LOT 39 $2,421.93 $2,353.89 101-40 TRACT 12873 LOT 40 $1,982,71 91,935.19 101-41 TRACT 12873 LOT 41 91,321.06 $1,289.40 101-42 TRACT 12873 LOT 42 $1,500.79 $1,464.83 101-43 TRACT 12873 LOT 43 $1,343.52 91,311.33 101-44 TRACT 12873 LOT 44 $1,437.66 $1,363.69 101-45 TRACT 12573 LOT 45 $1,407.55 $1,373.82 101-45 TRACT 12873 LOT 46 $1,583.04 91,517.06 101-47 TRACT 12873 LOT 4T 91,603.02 91,564.60 101-48 TRACT 32873 LOT 48 91,370.46 $1,337,64 101-49 TRACT 12873 LOT 49 $1,705.24 91,664.37 • ASSESSMENT PARCEL DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AMOUNT NUMBER TRACT NOM96R/r.nT era0n9T RE:1A:i:i KG 101-50 TRACT 12873 LOT 50 $1,770.39 $1,727.97 101-51 TRACT 12873 LOT 51 $1,786.12 $1,743.32 101-52 TRACT 12873 LOT 52 $1,787.24 $3,744.41 101-53 TRACT 12873 LOT 53 $1,774.89 93,732.35 101-54 TRACT 32873 LOT 54 $1,647.95 $1,608.46 301-55 TRACT 12873 LOT 55 $1,738.94 $1,697.27 103-56 TRACT 12873 LOT 58 $2,281.52 $2,226.84 101-57 TRACT 12873 LOT 57 $1,591.78 $1,553.64 101-58 TRACT 12873 LOT 58 $1,455.86 $1,d20.97 101-59 TRACT 12873 LOT 59 $1,317.69 $1,286.11 301-60 TRACT 12873 LOT 60 $1,563.70 $1,526.22 101-61 TRACT 12873 LOT 61 $1.568.19 $1,530.61 301-62 TRACT 12873 LOT 62 $1,309.82 $1,278.43 101-63 TRACT 12673 LOT 63 $1,576.05 91,538.29 101-64 TRACT 12673 LOT 64 $1,580.55 $1,542.67 301-65 TRACT 12873 LOT 65 $1,582.80 $1,544.86 301-66 TRACT 12873 LOT 66 $1,535.61 91,498.81 101-67 TRACT 12873 LOT 61 81,549.09 51,511.97 101-68 TRACT 12873 LOT 68 81,550.22 $1,539.07 101-69 TRACT 12873 LOT 69 $1,535.61 $1,498.81 101-70 TRACT 12873 LOT 70 $1,439.01 $1,404.32 101-T1 TRACT 12873 LOT 71 $1,398.5? $1,365.05 103-T2 TRACT 12873 LOT 72 $1,294.10 91,263.08 101-73 TRACT 12873 LOT T3 $1,423.26 $3,369.17 101-74 TRACT 12873 LOT 74 $1,297.47 $1,288.37 101-75 TRACT 12873 LOT 75 $1,299.71 $1,288.56 101-76 TRACT 12873 LOT T6 $1,485.06 $1,449.48 301-77 TRACT 19R'!'i T.nT 77 Oi ~~n on ~1 101-78 TRACT 12873 LOT T8 $1,309.82 $1,276.43 101-79 TRACT 12873 LOT ?9 $1,417.66 $1,383.69 301-80 TRACT 12873 GOT HO $1,315.44 $1,283.91 101-81 TRACT 12873 LOT 81 $1,318.81 $1,287.20 101-82 TRACT 12873 LOT 82 91,433.39 $1,399.04 101-83 TRACT 12873 LOT 63 $1,727.71 $1,686.30 301-84 TRACT 12873 LOT 84 $3,550.22 91,613.07 101-B5 TRACT 12873 LOT 8S $3,501.91 91,465.92 3U1-86 TRACT 12873 LOT 86 $1,392.95 $1,359.57 101-8T TRACT 12873 LOT 67 $1,445.75 91,411.10 101-88 TRACT 12873 GOT 88 $1,556.96 91,519.66 101-89 TRACT 12873 LOT 89 91,546.85 93,509.76 101-90 TRACT 12873 LOT 90 81,289,60 $1,258,70 103-91 TRACT 12873 LOT 91 $1,289.60 $1,258.70 101-92 TRACT 12873 LOT 92 51,546.55 $1,509.78 101-93 TRACT 12873 LOT 93 $3,422.16 91,388,06 101-94 TRACT 12873 LOT 94 $1,391,83 $1,358.47 101-95 TRACT 12873 LOT 95 $1,667.27 $1,646.83 • ASSESSMENT PARCEL DESCRIPTION ASBESSMENT AMOUNT NUMBER TRACT NOMBER/LOT AMOVNT REMAINING 301'96 TRACT 12873 GOT 96 $1,724.34 $1,683.01 103-97 TRACT 32873 LOT 9T $1,680.53 $1,640.25 Y01-98 TRACT 32873 LOT 98 $1,537.64 91,481.27 101-99 TRACT 12873 LOT 99 91,904.21 $1,272,95 101-100 TRACT 12873 GOT 100 51,341.28 $1,309.13 101-101 TRACT 12873 LOT 101 $1,330,04 $1,296.1? 101-102 TRACT 12873 LOT 102 $1,604.38 $1,370.53 301-103 TRACT 12873 LOT 103 $1,696.25 $1,655.60 101-104 TRACT 12873 LOT 104 $1,479.65 $1,443.99 301-105 TRACT 12973 LOT 105 $1,428.90 $1,394.65 ]01-106 TRACT 12873 LOT 306 $1,362.84 $1,349.70 101-107 TRACT 12873 LOT 307 $1,962.71 91,935.19 101-108 TRACT 12873 LOT 108 $1,824.31 91,780.60 101-109 TRACT 12873 LOT 309 $1,289.60 $1,258.70 103-110 TRACT 12873 LOT 110 $1,546.Bb $1,509.78 101-331 TRACT 12873 LOT 131 91,546.85 $1,509.76 103-112 TRACT 12873 LOT 112 $1,663.68 $1,623.63 301-113 TRACT 12873 LOT ]13 $1,663.68 $1,823.81 ]03-114 TRACT 32873 LOT 114 $1,348.85 91,309.78 101-115 TRACT 12873 LOT 115 $1,646.85 $1,309. T8 101-136 TRACT 12873 LOT 136 91,289.60 $3,268.70 101-117 TRACT 12673 LOT 317 $1,b56.96 $1,519.65 TOTA L °1°~,~:r.vo $181,878.38 • AMENOEO O/A6/PAM ASSESSMENT D/ST.P/CT NO. B6-Z C/TY e'1~hHACMI LLC4MOAG.I COUMY Q°59N BERNA~PP'.1D STATE Q" CAUfOMV/A .wmm a~nw~ ri ..uu ra ,e wm : w o~uw ~~in a ncs..m.r .~a a ra cxrv n..wv n w nmw.w mwn. w.~oa~. N ° .~.J. o..re~iw.Fm J .r. rssuv~ :..r.. ..mu `8 s~ x •'TUi'. r-..~n s. lRr r ww" m~ _~uv i~n_ n m ux ~Q LL~ .~: I ltw~[r - fine.~e iLWN rw •~Im'1.IioV! 'm[ NtGiwK u54~aI ru Yvim q M .oon ~ ui..wai w:` ..cwmm `u m'~r _ mm rv - ~`.~ua wo uw am wem~s u'::wr. aura... nn a .r:ao cr t[fi ~-- crn a. woo a..row SHEET /NA'X mom ~ i e.~wx~nrz~m e...e ~ .r:.., .~...m ..,..m • /,~ ASSESSMENT O/STR/CT NO. 86 -Z ~ (_uc_ J' ~, u,~un f^, .~ . 1 aN•n1'Nfr,. rn4f J [00f }~Y \'aA O G4 Y! Nei ~' t+s• _ ~ ~ f)G 1 Y ^ ro ,o.;,j~?o:o-moo.; _o~ o -O YC 61 jFO SC 6i v'_tl s'-60 ij ]9 A4:b „Fi~51, j:: b~~.f ~i ' 3 j F `af~j T• . f s f 9 i a~[ry +a. - •qF a uN Ys Yx NN ,fe+a _xl y.5%]:q ~~ ~CNGNWA" Mns..Y :PLACE usw _ ~' - ~ > ~rxa~. )YY ~ F 4 ,a x ,:u 'rt yNan a 't5w a .,'" - •, Y,[''Vn_ ;3g ~J -nw Yx Nm v4`. w. i[~~ Nd x4i s~etu [ a~ q '566 .a W q'Ne'tYt% Y j'J[YIIN.'av~S^~I =C.e- J'vn\ _~ly_gO q~ll6 j'llf Tg 111 Bp 11]j_ t'iOfAl ' y •: lfi~-•!t S i ~fi1Ni.[ N' ~~~ \^'+J O 1 C Y.1~• i15 i ~' ~LL'~!k[M r\ [_ i..e e i q Yw ~Y%T_~_._ Y ~ .I: n. l~ Nn" ?s3~op'. -x~ w ~O ~`:;~r ~jY.S Yf a ]in vq - Sq Im'tt^~IVAIt~ !i~j •} ~ its y a y IOt'SIO)'8110 Yt III jt 112 itij f Y9MY yM 3q nHA.I„ li§S~j a_]M\ + ~~ S, F q 'l Ti ~C .O M1, 1 ~ '[ xr,f S, s~`e • YY fl I i`Dan Sr~!~I of s k T ~k z WINE" °CWfl~ ~ r+N'• ~ ~ v vEOxnn Z ~ ~ ~01 a-~06a ~ S (~~ •O O~f lf'. '1 ~ 1[nl t~i~~xfi -.~wryOY ea.1 ~ ,nM[, ~ yY, Y `n Z V'r ` .~~'~ i F O r,»a W ~. H f °i a G s J r7a'YYf • _~~~~Y ~vYUr.~r 1 _ PLACE ~a 1 .w Yw n •I _ i z~~`yyaN . 6 I~ ~. .q -' ~. :.r .. ~F ,.~.~.n~. 'as.e W w _ .4 ~d pp ,. I, f , ~ P SEE SxEF1 M° • ` n, ~[,t gyn. ., wof ' ` ~ .r ~'1 .., .. ~ '..5 nea Iln ~~ t~,MY w, • -!r-~-.r~- u: Oa'~, `R '[[`N [: fu411 ' NK 44 MI [ [ Q K M MY -!f 4-r MI NA Rti y L! ;~~ ~, t< V l' TU i ,f. ~ )'~ M1~ ) j YCWiN IY 'n- lT ar ~4 '+ 4Sm y.'L, ~~,. 1~ G HN~P1~ ~~~ ~ ~~OI If a ~ {a - t:M WOE 4'.Y[[ t R6l .n !•lYi, gA„yN'Y11n 51n ~~ ASSESSMENT O/STR/CT NO. 86-z r xr' ;wst r w ~ e r ur l -_ ~ r/r Y0f Rr Y'.a ~ ~ ..JF ~~ ~ xM1 Y4M1 J'Mrn4' I _ r. .~~ .. . r n 11Mf r<f tT 1r r rNU,w b . Lfu...ur ' N/O :VltY ll•T ~ _ M1. ~Ornl W p •u:' ~ /OFM 9 ~~ ~.r r.s ftn 0 'r ~ •e x -nr m . ' ~x~el nJ m ~. r Y M rxuLNYFt! anR •,,al~, :. . ~~ ra ~r .._ f r a ;/oil Iy s~ ~ ! s eZe ~ I ~ Q M e._ ~r ~ tdru+u ' ur nn.N n .. __. .LL111 O J~ °r I` ~ xarr x e r rfl' I llro N't r5r I ~ 1 ~...ur E rr Yl•'~prw, wukw~~lw.. x l O LJ ~ N r i i u. u.: nt ! gE+rov ' NrN eNe+.n. r.w•uw.w~.. w.W~ /Orv/i WIWNMRM1 !N ' E ~" WnUtr lrtr; ~ O nrwUrHM M S - ~ a ~ Y.: eaa nru l a l n. nw• M u ~n iN« e Mr'9 J tNrtln+ltlO>ll! rR O .'N "Y I J t 'r a ~f w lO ' nMNNI nl ~%rlLx lWif /All tfN N ! i 1 N r'~Ix Irt tM!atr Yxt H'A1Y re ,~o-v y R r~xlw rur eYrreuxein a i. ~ Ppl'!a IM4' M N~Ir L J IwE 15 .'twNVE b1YN'r r x M ewtur n 1. ~r L r rx:nu ~iri^ ,1 J n w+'.ix rWr errs I J s lyneimia u+•e te~N I xrsr~ . V ... xnxnn b+MNI l s } f 6 ~ wa • ryt x%d r -~ m _ rr~.r .`~I x,~.e..LLUlw w . rt.n r a ~~ ~ xr.xi ,N `rtrm iu:.m l ~ J 1 ' [ 1 ~ f MxN~ Y1N P'.<rrlrlHr .YM1rI '! !' I+NT M J~ 1~ 1~'x'rnl y ( ) ?~-'SJ t rO X'M •OiM t'M1M rR nx r -. I` S : N xxe ue :per n, ! r'+:•.'u dXN! ~ u 'r SY'x~ r:l.'.M1w In~~r'[M'M1 ro.n ` ~.: .e+~x ~' . N.. ~ .r...nt ..... on ` `rtl ~en+ ..wn M -e e, M ~y4r ~..7 _ J.. ~, ~y _^~ll S to - ~ r Q } ac ^ J i "`4 k ''~ ~~ VOflT STflEET \S `. JCf aXCL1 MO l SfL fnFF1 MO Mwnt , mM ^x^111 tt r.l nrff+ xe nsM1 w j ~ 1) •rrut my Ne a b,f xaxtr ;~ . '~~ itA~ "N - :~ ~ : ii it . ~ ,'+, DETAIL ..~... ~ . `4~ ; ~t • o ASSESSMENT D/STR/CT NO. 86-2 ..~' I P .::'.. -- :~ _~. ~""- _~~:. F a=~•i.= SEf SNEET W NO ~ ~ ' ~ j:l ~ W 4~ ra9 % rN c e°~9C9•Y~ ~, SE~~LLON ~, GLAtµ '• .` - :'_ 4ar.. ` l'. .. _Y_Minu E 6 Y f a 'u^.' a >! S n qss~ xh ~_a ~F h. .bi(\3~-2\\~ f. iPN N tl~Y h'u Yt% -5 Ti,~ihy8n , rQ y ,' ~J ~; esF. `rvT~'zi nJ u _ ~ ~N"•_ r N _ _ _ _3 ~4BF91!'1 ~-~ i~P _' ~h).. 3/1~~~J~ i'fix NR F4MN 1Y CYN.• \ Jl4[f •-. = 33: ~."1s ~A ~ rcl.)/ a 2\ _ :~ r3 ~Y _ Yu <tl .410 :r hM4 e~~ ~1_" _ nfW wtl,Rn. p :~1 1N l •'~ 4JFC1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a?..If " 8 ~ { _ _ Q ~.1 Y3 ~ .F. Tl J' N ~ m. .~ its ~`: IN ~ `~ nr ~ 'x zs -~ ' a.i.' Q ai ~w~a•.'e ~•i.:. h - ~i ~ borne V~N` ,t `~.. 3h r ^r~ ~ oil y i ` _' . I s fr r. ra d ~ ~ .a r ~ TRAMINER Wu t'• ,ENO s ~ t 'v n _•~ . ... I ~~~. T..r '' /D'L. ~ L ~.. 3) 9. "u,ul n'x'rta'e'u N 3 ~ 13 ' ? >{{'~ § Il.._ __ Y W ~N _ .rev. a r .u :. .I 6N N i _ n ~_` V x J ~ r. ~.y L'°."'J. ,a..o _.'+iia~.- - -" yW ..~lor".:Y, i".. t: N. .. a. i ., I, J s,Ml_ t tl~. ~ sNq C ~5:z ?o 13 s,as a :. :. & u s._ :' E 'oN,n~wn+. tl1 i+. .fN. J 'YNI '!r ~ I^'qYn. tll'IN' f l•Y{:' a ~ ~~ _ •. •..N'4 Nt tlNN .:': • .. _•• • _ fYl !YM 3 O s' t. i r ~B4RSPC .e't:rn ' °wn nor Iii;.±iYe. •° ~'i ,r - .rye ~•IL.;..Ja .PLACE : _ r 1 r _ ~" ___ _ I nnJw .~nxnx. Y <wew,f~ .:~~ d ~+ Y r~ Mrl' rctlY/~ v ~ ., ~ Im,cf :.aNp el0.' ~ .550 y• 9x ~8 8 Y~ xe "1141 6 I r.a.'R ~. > IN Y ' .. w~":em I .nn. ,~ a: <IN ..ue aw,l, .a °Iror _ _ k+wY~~~Y _ _ _ __ -_ ': e1 e .I«Iwa lA ~ rMra r la ~~ f { -rt ,f NM .q rll. I,S~~. ', ___. te..k nlfY ux'.1 i ~%P 38.0 I FILE NO. ~ - I REVIEW REQUESTED: ~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ENVIRONMENTAL A^SE:'iMENT AY"~ ~'"'OPiA !'CMMONIT'i ?LAN AMENDMENT 98-Oi - J 'T_TY O6 F.ANCRO CIICAMCNCA Ar, nme~~`3in~r,t `. .?m '. i~_tor in Cummnn.i ty P: aa~ text modifyiny s~=rtni`i ~1_,,,.,l~pme::r ^a~u!ati on~~ f.~r Lrno Medi om and Med',m- Fc~~i~l~r:'.:ia.. I SUBMRTED: ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE: DESIGN REVIEW: TECHNICAL REVEW: EQUESTRIAN REVEW: GRADMIG REVIEW: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION: cRr couNC~: ADDRIONAL ACTION REQ'D: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: EXTENDED TO: FINALED ' PROJECT WRHDRAWN: war. vwneniwvvneaai ~cL~r'riv..c. APPLICANT/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE: PLANNER/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE: ENGINEER/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE: ARCHITECT/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE: n <° n n m a W a R V~ N OTHER/ADDRESS/TELEPHONE: . ~ ~ ORDiiriurCE NO. 34i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO a CASDNGA, CAL IEDRNL4, ADOPTING VICTORIA NMMINITY PLAN AMENDt~NT SS-03, 10 MJ DI FY THE LOW MEDIUM AND t~@DIUM RES IDENTIAI. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, does ordain ae follw s: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and de tetm Ines the follw ing: A. lfiat the Planning Commiecion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, follw ing a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends that Community Plan text amendment heteinef ter described, and this City Council hea held a public hearing in the time end manner preecr ibed by law and duly heard and co naide red said recommends tion. B. That this Community Plan tezt amendment is co nei scent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community PS en tezt amendment is consistent with the Develowent Code of the Citv of Re ncho Cucamonga. D. This Community Plan tezt amendment will have no significant em irormental impact ae provided in [he Negative De cl oration filed herein. SECTION 2: The Victoria Community P1 en text, Part III, Section I, Re gulatione end Standards for Devel olment, diagrams "lypicel Garage Se ibacka" on Page 204, is hereby amended, in parq to teed in tezt and graph ice as attached. SECTION 3: The Victoria Communi [y P1 en text, Pert III, Secr ion I, Regul scions and Stands rda for Development, aubse coon ^Reai de oriel Development Stands rda Lw Medium Density Reside noel", commencing on Page 212, ie hereby amended, in part, to read as attached. SECTION 4: The Victoria Community Plen teat, Part III, Section I, Regulations end Standards for Devel opmeni, evbse ction ^Reeidential Development Standards Medium De nasty Re eidential^, commencing on Pege 224, ie hereby emended, in pert, to reed ea attached. Ordinance No. 347 Page 2 SECTION 5: The prw ieione o£ thin Ordinance No. 347 shall not apply to Cho ee residential aubdiv iaione wherein a Tentative Mnp has been approved prior to the effective date of Chia Ordi:ance: prw ided no material mendaent• or eztensiona are made to ouch previously approved Tenutive Napo Por the purpo ee of calculating shoes prw iaiona rhich are [he aubj act of this Ordinance, those standards effective as et the time of approval of ouch Tenea rive Nape shell apply. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days of ter its pa ace ge at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulaCion publ iehed in the City o£ Onter io, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, end ADO PfBD this 18th day of May, 1988. AYES: Hrorn, Huqve r, Stout. King, Wright NOES: None ABSENT: None nnie L. Stout, Mayor ~TT~..J T. Beverly Authe et, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal iFornia, do herebq certi £y that the foregoing Ordi nanca rae introduced at a regal er meeting of [he Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on Che 4th day of May, 1988, end rae finally pea cad at a regular meeting of she City Council of the Ci tp of Rancho Cucamonga held on Che i8rh dap of May, 1988. 8:stated this 19th day of May. 1988 et Rancho Cucamonga. California. ~-~G- Beverly Authalat, City Qerk • ~ Ordimace No. 347 Page 3 TYPICAL GARAGE SETBACKS Original Poor Quality FROM CURB ONLY MRpM CURS A/~ WALI( Sao fmawa~a) 9W~ sasac ~~~ j ~~ sinryw s wo~ys ~ wyr ~arwMJ~ +~ araa- nlas Moak rallia ~Yr s..~a.ax Ai1L r dw Irrrob ram _~ .. ~...yw ws pinaiiaa Original Poor Quality w ^~r w~ Ordi nonce No. 347 • Page 4 • RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPlENT STANDARDS (continued) 3. Lw-Medium Density Residential ("LM^ Lnnd Use Pl en designs tion)s Lend designated as Lw-Medium Denei ty Residential is intended far residential Bevel opaent that hee a range of four to eight drellinga per adj oared gross acre. the follwing regulaiion^ are applicable to rheas areas: a. Uaea Permitted: detached of attached reside niial duel lingo not exceeding eight duel lingo per adj oared gross acre, including, but not limited tax (I) Single family attached dwellings. (2) Single Family attnched dwel lingo, including, but not limited to, dupl ezee and tripleu e. (3) Cl voter Housing. (4) "Zero lot line" homes. (5) Community Facilities as epecif ied on page 241. b, Accessory Uses Permit ied: eery of the follw ing uses and airucturee. U) Garages and carports, in wmpl iance with the site develolaent standards provided herein. (2) Fences, Pella, end trellises. (3) Swimming pools with a minimum 5 foot high Fence enclosing pool. (4) Ac ce esory uses and structur ee necessary or customarily incide oriel [o a principal use ea permitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordi nonce. a Site Develoiment Standards: (1) Single Pem ily Center Plot dwellings. (a) Building ei[e area: 5,000 eq. ft, minimum, 5,500 aq. ft. average. (b) Building Bite width: 50 feet minimum. It i• intended that Bice widths pill vary according to lot size. (c) Building Bite coverage: varies according to lot aiae, see typical loc plena, pp. 214 - 223. (d) 8uil ding aetGcb: varies according to lot aiae, sea typical lot plane and table. s ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..~ ~a ~ T I ~ ~~ ? ~,~ a' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~,-- ~a M ~ ~~~ ~ ~T ~~ d ~i S Fv ~ w r O N C ~`~ W ~O~! ~,FF~SS iii iii i~ i3 ~~ _~ `~ >:~ ,.. e e ~ ~ .. e e :: ~~ A A • Y =: N N i C C • ^ W ~ ~ ~ 4 C C r ~y M S YLa C C~ Q O ~ ~ 3 e~ i a Y Y 4 t~ ~ '3 ~ 3 ^ ^ r, e i Y N ~~ ~~ a3 • v I e I 3 6 r W i 9Yt S Y ~ Ordinance Nc. 347 c . Page 5 ~~ CV ~ C _C a ^ ~ ^ ~+ .' W ~ r a ~, n c e c i ~ i i C N y N V1 1 N iV e c c c R ~y A P Y ~ y W Y Yyi N N N . a L C n 6 '~ ^ ~ ^ ^ R ~ ~ ~ yp S 0 i pN y O y C Yyy C N r Y YLa NN NM y~p C u 7 yY a yY V C~C O Y ~S N 1y ~ O M N n JI ti J{ _ g S 8 S C& L& ~ ~ : as ~ g5 i ~ ~ "a it gY Y ~ Y V ~ Y gY ~ V 5 5- ~, s- ~ S S y .~ a I ., @ G Ordi rmnce No. 347 . • Pnge 6 (e) Building height: 35 feet mazimum. (2) Cluster housing. (e) Building eito area: 2 scree minimum. (b) Building Bite coverage: SOx maximum. (c) Building se the cos: See diagrams For typical building se the cks, pP, 214 - 223, (d) Building separation: See diagram For typical building separation distances, pp. 214 - 223. (e) Building height; 35 feet, maximum. (f) Building site width end depth: Ae pe[m i[ted by required se the cka. (g) Pr ivete open space: 300 eq, ft. minimw. (3) Innovative housing. (e) Building Bite area: 3,500 eq. ft. minimum. 4,000 aq, ft. average. (b) Building ei to coverage: Aa permitted by required se tbac ka end private open ape ce. (c) Building ee for cka: See diagrams for w~a crl Juii ding se tbeoka. -.., ~ iii. (d) Building height: 35 feet maximum. (e) Building si to width end depth: Ae perm heed by required se ebscka. (f) Pr ivete open apace: 700 sq. Ft. minimw. The above Bite development stands rds apply co projects which eta detmed innovative. Innovation in ei ogle fem ily development aeene prw iding creative design solutions which address the critical concerns of neighborhood compatibility, de nei ty cran ei tion, end design quality, Innovative proj seta ere cherecterized by an attractive etreetecape which ie not monotonous, nor ie the street aeene dominated by aspheltfconcrete, garage e, and earn. Innovative design me9ne finding tree tive wey6 to ct sere well-designed space, parti cul erly use ble yard ape ce. 'LM' LAND USE ~++""'" ae.tr« soon ar. _ eooo..r. rrorer s w ^roo n. • Ordi nonce No. 347 Pege 7 ~•~ Original Poor Quality ~.~.. Gwyt iu aeryc ;[f6.~,m,A„y S~arymti silo n. ,t,. Original Poor Q;,a!;ty ~Ceear+9 ..~-asp w~ATtia ~u~w:ww ~~42 ~ '9 ims ro y muz ~,~.. vw.nwy ~+.d.r~.rp. •,n +asr~c+d nr. Ordinance No. 347 • Pege 8 10p0-6000 S.F. LOT eonl~r plot Origir.ai Poor Quality ~b ,~. yo .:waas Saoidu~n ` ~. ~ ~ soon sr ur. sd l~ ,a. ooo s. u• ~ .rw '~ n U ,..c,,,,.a,.,ox~,,~..~r.;.~~;,~ Original Poor Quality • Otdina rce No. 347 • Page 9 sooo-eooo s.R. nor soa-iet-un. Original Poor Quality „_~. o~ror,w ,~. o}e.w,uRwar. ,.w SN'~gld~' S~/iOGOkJ hQT1~tw G~OtlMltB1: CO~ffMm Mf~Iwr10~'4f ~11/M Original Poor Quality 9eildtn/ /it/ etd/F vCNN Ordinance No. 347 • Page 10 . ' 'LM' LANG USE O~igir.al Poor Quality ~Y MH WM l~N ~:!. ~OS:p2.7i - - MNM N~~~~Mw N ~ 7~ f6 a i. ~ .e~ _ ,wy Vovip ~r+L. uvp„yy~ ~ Du Jn4ae.; .VYl .i6A[T~vr nw~y~l .~Pa4 as afonow mbk jlDw pYpiL royy :IV'ia .D~i c~vp(a mf{ 1YYt M ~eciln w+~o~e+•nt. 1/rr[. 9wl/0- ~/ a~oliC Mm xa b i¢~1/ri ¢Lr~ Aar ~~ :Ariem re rnrv~4L ~aoiy aL S~wiav Hwy. .rA~arat :v ~+o+w.lY Dell ^11~L XaW'4 .:VtY :U '.~CL~L YX.lJL J[!lW'<.L1N.' W'L J~(YL[L /~ ~,, "" ' """ Original Poor Quality 4w~~ .w~aw ~r .urtwew ~ ~'~ ~ DYaue ,msoewwt nq~{ o~L GSxvne.L ,mrw AwlL. - aaaL, yy pyuk • Ordinant¢ No. 347 Page 11 Origiral Poor Quality 700 ~.l. LOT rNrWIMr ttu>•roth~ ~roMiot Ji4r/~SF+~i MYra~a F..ry ,~ a .~. _~~ ~o/r.w,. !r 77yiaF s~ au Ordi pence No. 347 . • Pege 12 'LM' lANO US! ~ r- ~~~ mYYSN~n bl zlzC s soo c.c zae - lel - uM r r r ..~ - o.d e;axa ;:.~«rw,e ee z ap rt . •-J Yocr Quality nnrfir mdaravd ama+nir .fq.:rs ai. dw,a.f wa+c Fw. P~'° ^.e+, mun.n4y pWf,.u.a Py'~ aen~ .haw. Vim.: rway 6'7f'flMfi11OY p.d~ I _.._ ~ . ~ . Mule a. P,oa.fy u~f uwarw .LaiLn+c unbk apw>~ mra nev by x~rtopfr, iniiu~.+w i.s ww pr ler (ls9mL .n'fr) sff~ ~ ~g{nal POOP_ Qua{ity ,i~un~. Ju up~ral Jarrrs JauW Jau,dafa1 .$Y16yN1~~ J i, +{uI. :O I[ pffM(A bWiouyf -'~ U 3soo s.F. nor Original Poor Quality aro-roaon. PrivaC. vP.n .{awr goo .v.cr. ~..e .{,,. r $~ ~~ ~~ ~..._ {~ lao ryra~ J~iy -~ ~.{idfy .{.. ~{d/h v.nw ~ Nashnw.. i;ss.uo. 0071 o/aex .ides prop.sy +iw . Ordinance No. 347 Page 13 ap e.s.u. iop.,r.gj.Mn3w -T~ I, ~ ~~ ~~ Original Poor Quality Ordinance No. 347 . Page 14 `;; ~i~iral Pocr Quality RBS 1DcNT'IAL DBVELOPMENT STANDARDS (continued) 4. Medium Density Aeeide noel ("M" Land Use Plan de signs tion): Lend de signs tad ee Medium DeneiCy Reeidentiel is intended for residential development theC renge• From 8 to 14 drelling units per edj oared gross acre. lfie £ollw ing regal atioN are applicable for these •rese: a, Usee Permitted: detached or attached residential dmel l{nge nct ezceeding fourtaen dwellings per edj ueted gross acre, including, but not limited co: (1) Single family dwellings - attached or ie Inched, including, but not limited to [wnhouaes, tripl area, fourPl arse, end condom inium e. (2) Cluecer housing. (3) Community fmcil it iee, page 241. b. SiCe Development Scnndards: (1) Cl aster housing. (e) Building site area: 3 acres minimm. (b) Building si ce average: Aa petm fitted by required se [becks and private open space. (cj Bmising ee tbackas See building setback diagrams on Che £ollw ing page for typical sa [backs. (d) Building separation: (i) building 35 feet or lees in height, 30 feet minimum. (ii) boil dings over 35 Feet in height, 15 feet minimw. (e) soil ding heigh c: 40 feet mezimum. (f) Building site wid[h end depth: As permitted by required setbacks. (g) PriveCe open ape ce: 300 sq. ft. minim. (2) Innovative single tamily housing, (a) Building ales area: 3,500 aq. ft, minimum, 4,000 sq. fe. average. • • Ordinance No. 347 Page 15 (b) Building site coverage: Ae perm i[ted by required ce tbacks end private open apace. (c) Building ee tbacka: See building setback di egrme on the follw ing page for tgpicel ee tbecka. (d) Building separation: See building setback diagrma on the fol for ing page Eor typical setbacks. (e) Building height: 35 feet maximum, (F) Building Bite vid[h and depth: Ae permit cad by required setbacks, (g) Private open spa ce: 300 eq, ft. minimum, The above site developent standards apply to proj ect• which ere de®ed innovative. Inmvnti on in single fmily developoent means ptw iding creative design aol utions rhich address the critical co ncern• of of neighborhood competibil ity, denai ty traneitlon, and design qual i[y. Innwative proj seta are cheracteriz ed by an attractive atteeescepe rhich ie not monotonous, nor ie the serest scene doming [ed by asphalt/concrete, garage e, end care. Innwative design means finding creative pays to create vel l-designed space, particul erly usable yard apace, Ordinance No Pa~ 16 34~ A $ • A ~ ti a a vy n ~ S .r II$$~~ x~ ~ ~ F r;° ~ s v6 ~ ~R~i ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ `~ w ~ s s qjt cc Y ~~ R ~ "~ ~~~ ~ 3 0 r ~g~ ~ p f i Ai' n 4' ~ a ~~ e~ - T y 1~. M /. a M fA~' R ~~ a ,y 9 iI a 1 [ ~ ) ~ ~'`_ • /Z,~~. i ~~~~ '~ y ~ ~` a' ~ ~ Fi ~ a a S ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ()~ i' ~~~ T -~~~ ~ _ o ~~ ~~~~~~ Fa ~Pt ~ ~ ~~ti~apr` 0. a 0 r 4^ C i:~I g~'~ 30 O c s ~- c ~ n; O Y O T a T ~ i i ~p a ant ~ o • ;~ • '~ Ordinance No. 347 • Peke 16 ~ y • O T j~ O a y m w y }(4~ S 111 ~ ~ ~ i~` O = E N ~i t yY i y ~T > iey ~ r ~4eY 6 O i N ~ g~ T i~ yC ,~ 5i `FF R= ~iTii i•~i Fn i k s i#~A ;A`!5 a 3 a: ~ Y ~@ '~ n1 ~ g ~ o ~~y ~ ~ s ~ E ~~ ~ S ~ ~ O ~' m Cq 2 ~ 9 C d • 'D M O ~ ~~~ ~ O z ~ C k ~ a r ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ s ~ '~ ~ ~ i ~ Y ~ ~~ ~ ~ j~1. ~~ ~~~~~~ i ~ i~ I~ ~~~~A. I ~. ~ ~ ~ > .~~' s ~ a I a ' ~' ~~ ,, ~~. ~a . 9 ~~ Original Poer Quality i •w urn use bone ww.u,e,.Mwr. ro - 1: ar.MVq uw~ i w. A bas (a.r1 w~Gwi F.. au jieru aey oR d's au.c ~s Y dK alv~[ oraYTbrt. T43 YiY'~ta ~ ~ WY/~y .v Aa rmr"gi d~c S~aJl+y. A aws!! w,lk marrw Ais ~A ryio+l6 AaIP~ aY fleiti~ dn'e~y` pn'~sa awafmr N0°"',4rmo4~ ordinance No. 741 Pege 17 UN e ;.. ... :.,.e. i-uu PLua awawl v ~ nar of .a°'*'"9 'iDa` ,41W efny fo hua fPs'A~ lasJaa~x arAaaaia . tul~wpet °R"'puc nrar rm~u ~ .'wf7~ud~ G"?' PKk`"9.um~ r~r 'Nhas Poambl., sw.6 ksq, nraw,ir, e.~:+rarruovd .i2wr OI Je+agit and AW74h' fpaa.~. 2+Tak uy r4fwa1ty Midi ?Cm~a9 .11`lKasyf~ ~IQaf62' .yTN, 149y1~r6 Lwi~1+'4.tr, c3xaga srtberk a tyP'oJ Gmnyr Sndsak Jrmdan4 YIR p'fEf on aLb ~ :r 9MCr rg4f! ~N4 AIV1Y4 .Cnp1 MaL1! Yteh .Y4a(tnt 4aai 1YM LWYAPILpTGOs[a! twr~e:t q .w1bw~ muM' 4 ~ A4MS!!c, asa nila wily ordinance No. 347 Page 18 'M• uno usa ~ ~ Original Poor Quality ,.. ie.aw tnwrhosss to - la aw.wno ~ 7 .a. ~.~ msehew has a dar +wv!. qa a grsWdes aw s ~. ,~ov m de "n! ~ ~ r°'r's'' the ,w, ply. Jrrs w.ka •ar ~ rxr ~ aaaoeelr. ~ °..~ d~iloa}r "J~ nta ~~j nyv. 4fi _^ SpaeG lWeaP. e+sse+see K ~ °JJ'~' Original pocr Quality ~wr w~w usE roroi.. 12 - 1a dwaMny aiYt~ i aen 7'~ ,ryas u arror.(olaL ~ eYrk re,saL ~ari9arn.u aw .wrynC prrei aYs 4 w~~ vl .rte ._~~ _ , • Ordinance No. 347 Page 19 .!~ 0 M M A' +~ww ~+ww.~ Bryrfc Emil. Vamn'r iprk~ Ncmnn, iUrieay f4nrw! cfmvll m huLfiup WMtr nu~y oawrct .4tµi~ m m~.t :,a,Z, °!w'.JP~ ase~orM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 21, 1988 Nilltam Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Pmt OIBa Box 801. Rancho Cucamonga, GlQomu 91 TJ0, p1A198418i1 SUBJECT: VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-03 Gentlemen: The Plann/ng Caawlssion has recamaended approval to the City Council of the above-described protect at their meetlly of Apr11 13, 1988. Attached are copies of alt documents pertinent to that approval. The decision of the Planning Commission is final following a ten (30) day appeal period which began with the date of the hearing. Appeals must be filed to writing to the City Clerk, state the reason for Lhe appeal, and be accompanied by a 5126 filing fee. Dl ease review aqy conditions relative to utility undergrounding required in corllunction with your project. Nhere undergroundtng is a condition of approval, you should establish contact with affected utilities as soon as possible to avoid delays 1n processing your protect. If you F. ..fit--- -\- «- n~..l. ~rV 4~' y.wu ~~ VVU wb• Mw ~1 Y~I NIRw JGp 1rI V11 UI WIC Engineering Division. As you are aware, your project was approved subleCt to certain conditions of approval. Please note that condltlons mma,Y specify completion of certain plans or work prior to the issuance of building pemltts, final map recordation, or occupancy release. Your timely attention to these conditions is necessary to avoid delays in the completion of your pro,~ect. If you should have any questions concerning specific condltlons, please contact the appropriate department. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our office at any time. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION •! Ke11y Orta Senior Office Assistant /ko Attachments tW, Ih•hnmhA Ilnixxn I~~Itn•i king .tl„i,,., IWnni.I ~wW Charley I Huyurl II Pamela ~ tl nghl Laumn \I tan,.ernuln ~ ~ ~i~e~YILLI~~I LYO\ ~om/um~ 85d0 ARCHIBALD,, SUITE R, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PI41 980-22dd April 14,1988 Mr. Brad Buller, Planning Director fi ty of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Subject: Victoria Community Plan Amendment-88-03 Dear Brad: I would like to Cake this opportunity to follow up on last nights Planning Commission meeting regarding the referenced subj etc. Our understanding of the Commissions action with respect Co discussion on the ordinance will be as follows: 1. Language will 6e added to the proposed ordinance to encourage innovative center plot houses on lots with a minimum of 3,500 square feet, averaging 4,000 square feet with a minimum lot width of 50 fee[. This would be the minimum size lo[ for any single fami Ly product and center plot units could occur on lots smaller Chan [he 5,000 square foot minimum/5,500 square foot average that will become the new minimum for (typical) center plot single family detached homes. 2. Product to be designed by The William Lyon Company or builders to whom we may sell lots in trace L344C, 13441, 13442, 13443, 13444, 17445, 13280, 13281 and 13753 will not be subject to mandatory use of the set backs proposed in the new ordinance. The William Lyman Campo ny and/or builders who may purchase Lo[s !n these tracts may wish [o voluntarily comply with the set barks in [he propsed ordinance but will not be required [a do 50. The requirements for set backs will be as sec forth in the product prototypes approved by the Planning Commission Cor each of these traces. 3. On single Eamtly decached center plot product types the minimum total of IS feet of side yard set 6a<ks will have no side yard sec back with a dimension of less than 5 feet and Scoff will develop some languaxe for minimum clearance of a given dimension For the other side yard se[ back. Again, the intent is co allow some flexibility in the total of 15 feet of side yard set backs while insuring a minimum of 5 feet and a minimum clear space for access to Che rear yard For [he homeowner. We would suggest that the minimum clearance 6e 7 fee[ or 8 feet and [hoc language be included to prohibit fireplaces, air conditioning units and other architectural projec[Lons loco char minimum clear area. R EAI ESTATE DFVELO PMENT ~ ~ - "agC L - We understand [hat with the above referenced exceptions the proposed ordinance will be forwarded to the City Council as wr it [en. He would 6e happy to provide whatever illustration you feel would be helpful for any of these proposed ordinance changes [o [he Victoria Community Plan. Please toot act me at your earliest convenience to let me know if you would like fot us to prepare any diagrams for inclusion in [he proposed ordinan<e changes. R ece ~Ily, .'f e n Ford ~%i~ Protect Manager SF/ksd cc: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner L RESOLUTION N0.88-65 i A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CpMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-03, TO MODIFY THE LON MEDIUM ANO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NHEREAS, an the 13th day of April, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65654 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following~ndi-ngs: That Lhe AwendaM'nt wilt provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Naendment will provide for development within the Dl strict in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the Ctty; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and ..b,.c -•i a; - ..,rid ... da.:.•----- „t ,.ithis tha District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to the City Council the •,ssuance of a Negative Declaration on April 13, 1988. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Intendment 88-03. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88-03 to modify the Community Plan per the attached Ordinance. PLANNING Cp1AIS55~~ RESOLUTION NO. • VICTORIA COIMUN17lPLAN ANENpiENT 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLANNING~C0IMISSION OF/T~HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONBA BY- //cam/~i~.uJ/C i~,~~~ zaS~'R-CFi'$ea""Vtce a ~ n ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Beputy Secretary of the Planning Coawlssion of the City of Rancho Cucaabnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution ws duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Caad sslon of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Caaaaission held on the 13th day of April, 1988, by the following vote-to-Nit: AYES: C0IMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, TGLSTGY, EMERICK, CHITIEA NOES: CgMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMAISSIONERS: MC NIEL ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coswlssion FROM: Brad Buller, Ctty Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner ~ Gucwaio,~ f I~ UI ~ I> isn SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88-U3 - CITY OF RANGHD CUCIIMUNBA - M amenament to Chapter o e eve oilmen Cade modifying certain developwent regulations for Low-Medium Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMIUNTT'T PLAIT amen o e c or a n y an ex ifying certain development regulations for Low-Medium and Medium Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISA COMIUNITY PLAN amen n o e errs s n y an ex modifying certain development regulations for Low-Medium and Medium Residentiai. BACKGROUND: During recent years, the City has seen an increase in eve opment of single family detached subdivisions in the Low- ,~.~a~ „-o uweuing untts per acre D sir ct, particularly in the 6-8 dwelling untts per acre density range. In reviewing these proposals, the Planning Commission has consistently raised concerns regarding neighborhood appearance, usable yard area, and design quality. The City Council has directed the Planning Commission to re-examine the Low-Medium optional standards, with emphasis on strengthening the development standards to address these critical issues. On September 11, 1986, the Director of Community Development presented to the City Council a slide presentation on the issue of minimum lot sizes and minimum dwelitng unit sizes. Following that presentation, the Council accepted the BIA's offer to fund a study of housing and marketing conditions 1n relation to the lot size/unit size options presented by staff to the Council. The study was commissioned as a factual survey to provide data for the Council to use in the decision making process. The primary ob,iecttve of the study was to anaiyze what impact the proposed or any increase in lot size/unit size would have on the housing market in Rancho Cucamonga. The completed study was presented to the Commission and Council in November of 1987. The Commission received the study as a factual document and concluded no further staff analysis was necessary. ITEMS P, Q, R PLANNING CpMIS~ STAFF REPORT DCA 88-03, VCPA 03, TVCPA 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Devel t Lode: On February 10, 1988, the Planning ss on rev awed and considered options for developsknt standards to address the critical concerns of snail lot development. The Planning Caawisslon directed staff to proceed with the necessary amendments based on Option 2 for both center plot and innovative product: CENTER PLOT (LON-MEDIUM OPTIONAL STANDARDS) OPTI011 2 5,000 sq. ft. Mfniww Lot Area 5,500 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 5/10 ft. Side Yard M1nlaaw Setback 25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback 20 ft. Front Yard Minlmua Setback IS ft. Rear Yard 50 ft. Lot Mlniaaa N1dth INNOYATiYE PROOU;T (LON-MEDIU OPTIONAL STANDARDS) OPTION 2 3,500 sq. ft. Minimum lot Area 4,000 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 0/10 ft. Side Yard 20 ft. Front Yard 15 ft. Rear Yard 45 ft. Lot M1nlalum Nidth B. Planned Coaawnlttes: Nlthin the Terra Y1sta and Victoria annPl-ed~o~unff' e a number of aaienitles are provided as a trade-off far smaller lots. The planned caaaWnittes feature extensive trails systems and other design amenities wAtch, in itself, is a forty of innovation the City encourages. Therefore, staff would recoamiend that innovation continue to be encouraged within the planned communities by not increasing setbacks and lot width, except for traditional center plot homes. The following standards are recoaaknded: ~Q~~~ PLANNING COMMIS STAFF REPORT • DCA 88-03, YCPA 03, TYCPA 88-03 Apr11 13, 1988 Page 3 CENTER PLOT PRODUCT (LON-MEDIUM/MEDIUM RESIDENT?LL) 5,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Area 5,500 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 5/10 ft. Side Yard Mlntmua Setback 25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback ZO ft. Front Yard Mlnlmua Setback 15 fL. Rear Yard 50 ft. Lot Minlsua Nidth INNOVATIVE PRODUCT (LON-MEDIUN/NEDIUM RESIDENTIAL) 3,500 sq. ft. Mintsum Lot Area 4,000 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 700 sq. ft. Private Open Space Minimum The additton of a standard for private open space 1s necessary to ensure that adequate outdoor space is provided because of .uryii~y iiu'ddv~ Ida, JalU "CWOCR 1:VnY1[1005. Both Planned Comaunlty texts currently contain separate standards for "conventional" and "cluster" development. Conventional housing 1n Terra Vista includes single family detached center plat, zero lot line and stogie family attached units. Zero lot line, "Z" lot line, and duplex/triplet style homes are innovative design techniques that should be distinguished Eras traditional center plot housing types. Staff recamsends that "tonventlonal" be renamed "center plot" and allow the other lnnovattve form of housing under cluster/ lnnovattve standards. Cluster housing generally scans a project where the hoses are clustered together on a single building site and usually around a common open space system. This is an lnnovattve site planning concept which is one fona of a "Planned Unft Development" or PUD. Staff recowaends that the cluster development standards be expanded to include other types of innovative housing previously sentloned. P,Q,R-3 PLANNING COMMIS STAFF REPORT DCA 88-03, YCPA 03, TYCPA 88-03 April 13, 1988 Page 4 The Mediu• Residential and Terra Y1sta Lasssun dweiling units per ac range of the C1ty's or has aswHlded its &ne density that forakriy dwelling units per an acre) by changing the land use to 8 to 14 land use designation in both Victoria y Plans has a density range of 4 to 14 This followed the Medial density Anal General Plan. However, the City 1 Plan to eliminate the overlap of existed between the Low-Medt~a (4-8 )and Mediw (4-14 dwelling units per malty range of the Medial Residential ~111ng units per acre. Staff would recamaend that the sass! change be made for Victoria and Terra Vista for the soak reasons. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recosends that the Plannl~ Coswlsston con c e pu ltc hearings. If the Ordinances art acceptable as drafted, then adoption of the attached Resolutions reeaamendtng approval to the C1ty Council would be appropriate. Ii there arc any necessary mod/flcatlons to the Ordinances, staff should be directed to smoke the changes and bring the revisions back to the Planning Coswisston. RespecYFu~ tted, ( ~ .~ ~~ Brad Bul .~ C"° "l s BB:DC:te Attachments: Resolutions Ordinances ~?q,R-'f ~ ~ ~1Pe~~TLLL~.~I LYO\~r4~ny OSAO ARCHIBALD, SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 1714) 900-22d4 Ap zil 13,1988 Larry McN ie 1, Chairman 8 Members of Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Environmental Assessment 6 '!ic[oria Community Plan Amendment 88-03 Dear Chairman & Members of Planning Commission: We would sincerely appreciate your consideration of the Following requesc with respect to the subject referenced: 1. Any application of rh is amendment should no[ apply to tracts previously approved by [he planning commission including those approved in Che Victoria Planned Community as custom lo[ subdivisions. The reason far ehis requesc is that we did have a prototypical plotting approved by the Planning Commission with these custom la[ tracts and have subsequently sold these tracts to other builders. _ 5..::a.. _.. :, ,..,, ~ .rhaaed rhnce rrarrs in vood faith from The William Lyon Company based on the se[ back requirements and lo[ size requirements approved with each map. The set back requirements as approved in the subject amt ndmene could seriously affect each of these builders ability [o produce and market a product econam itally consiseant with [he original intent of design approvals. Tbese tracts would be tracts L3440, 13441, 13442, 13443, 13444, 17280, 13281 end 13753. I' 2. We support the change to a 50 foot minimum lot width Eor all JM~ center plot single family detached projects but ue would also suggest that single family detached center plotted products can be done very successfully on lot sizes smaller than 5,000 square Eeet. Perhaps the best examples of ehis are the wide shallow lot programs proposed in .:aces 13442, 13445, and 17281. The minimum open space requirement :efca need fer innevst!ve product aE 700 squn re fret would be exceeded nn anv lot with a 50 foot wf dth and a minimum rear yard dimension of LS Eeet. We are achieving this end averaging significantly more than :his on tract 13445 with our wide shallow lot program. The lots to tract 17445 heve a minimum size of 7,000 square feet and average 1,634 square Eeet. In tract 13442 [he minimum lo[ dtmens ion is 55 feet in width and 73 Eeet in depth. The minimum lo[ size is 4,098 square Eeet and the average lot size is 5,681 feet. In [race L7281 where the REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ ~%~e~VILLI.~~[ LYO\~am~ean~s -2- minimum lot dimensions are 50 feet in width and 60 feet in depth the minimum lot size is J,008 square Eeec and the average lot size is 3,847 square feet. Attached herewith are copies of the product prototype exhibits as approved by the Planning Commission depicting this innovative lot and product configuration that encourages a dramatically improved scree[ scene for lot programs of this size with a center pLo[ detached product. the market place always prefers a detached center plot house and we strongly feel and urge your consideration of inclusion in Che proposed amendment of provisions to allow innovative, center plot homes of [his type on lots less Chan 5,000 square fee[ in area but no less Chan 50 feet in width. J. We support [he recommends [ior~ to have a minimum of 15 feet of side yard setbacks on any center plot units. However we would suggest rather than setting one of [hem [o be always 5 fee[ and the other one always 10 Eeec that Che re be flexibility allowed so chat [he set backs must total 15 feet with one of [he setbacks having a dimension no less than i feet. We understand there is also a desire [o allow a minimum clear side yard to the rear yard so chat perhaps an additional par[ of this criteria should be that one of the side yards shall have no less than 8 Eeec clear without archiGettural or equipment projections. In summary our tonterns [ha[ we would like you to address are -that anv new lot size and or set back requirements not 6e applicable co product Chac has ye[ [o be submitted on previously approved trac [s. -center plot houses of an innovative design be encouraged on lots less than 5,000 square feet in area but no less than 50 Eee[ in width. -that flexibility be encouraged in [he required IS foot total o£ side yarn set backs. Thank you Eor your consideration of this request. I will be at the Planning Commission hearing [o respond [o the staff report as well as any questions you may have ac that time. spec ally,//J ~~ ven Ford ~ ~ ~ W W - R w ~ : ~ 3 { U8 ~yy~~QWy~ WWW a {~QpW W O Z G. 2F F~Q W WT 2[ ~ ^° S ~~ ,L W ff~"~~2~ ~~ w~~W ~ C ~e~~e 0 ,~ fit: ~tf ~.i C. V~I u~ ~~` L' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ _. ~~~~~~ r ~I R~ '~ ~\ Q F-/ J a ~~ f ~n z~ w ~'°'~ ~° a ~ ~_ } o ., ~~ O'~~~` f- H ~ 03 ~ ~%~= a. H ~ A3 dx ~a w W a~ a ~ a~'., U ~ p ~s p HC'~W~ Z Z ~ h~ ~F~® ~ ~ ~ r...~,._:__ N ~ I L.ili----, .~. ~ I II I . .~ _r . ~ ~~ •~ ~ '~ ! ~ ~ m s~u~ =: s n .~ _` C 7 31~ ii ""~`~ ~f~ ~~. 9 ' J 1 ~ l~~ i~l ~il 6 3 i ~~ 3: ~~ • 'I I~ I I~ ~~ ~~ ~~ _~ R d 0 :6 C hA /~„C ~1 !M'v~'~ n..+ t z~ ~~~; ~ ~ :;_ X111 d ~~,~~ ~ ~_ ~ -~ c ~'~'~ ~ ~ O " `"'' ~ ~~ J a 6 ~ ~ F~Ip '''t i ~ M.j ;z'. HI yKa p 3a r 1 ,J]A E"' ^'' Z~~~ ~~ E., J N ' ~~ i ' ~ ~f~ ' ~ :~[ i ~~ ~ ` 3 ''(/~' J/~.~~ e M~ L.i rCiIORYC;7D OIpNVL ~"~ s e runoM smrvaa-ue E,~ z ~i - •~ ~.~. ^.e ^ssrye~e~a see ~~p ^ Original Poor Quality r. .~° 3 5~i :~-~ , 9 ril I t , ~~ I r ~ !~ ~ a } ~~ ~~ ~ ~1 ~ ~. ~I ~~ ~ ~ .. _ __ o 0 d ~,~ ~ o c _~ ~~. `,~ ~. ~ :~ ~_ o: rDN01lf~~fl~OfYJMYtl E~'i b N1tlON SOtlYA3NIA ~ii ~ ~~ ~1 ^ww ~s,oa acs ^e11vRq~ AI ~C a~~ rov®a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~e~ ~~~ ;~ ~s' ~ ~~ 3 ~, o ~~ ~ o 0 ~~ ~ .•~? ~a ' ~ r7 :~y? '~~-p .~ ~ _ O _C ~ -t~ ao '~~ J 7 I d~~~~ ~ i - ~: ` .^` ~ ~si~ ~~' '~ ~ ~ ~( ' I~ a?! ~ i ~ a ~~ ~~~ ONONV:N10 ON~NYtl. ~~i 6 NIUON SOtfYA3NU Ff' ~ •C ~~ ./ <~.. ~~s e• .i: H j ~~~ :li ~ o _ ~ o ~- ~~ r :~ a © ~ o ~~ a ~! --- _ ~~ ~~ .-_~- :T ~~~ i x~ ' ~ _ ,. Y r~ ~4 i L---------~ eoMOnvxac+~+`~ E'i . ' Nl}ION SaNrrA3fLA li. ~ •~~+ ~~1p~ jp~i!I pp,,~~~ pp ~®~ iGi®~~ ~~~~~~9'3~ ~~°d `cis' -~+ ~,~ .~ L 4 1 L ~ V f~ ~ ~' ®b c ~ ~ r O O ! _ z i 4ti +~ ~ c, ~ ~ M '.3 i~ ~b0 i •~ t ~ _ O c `~ i! ~ i~~ /t''~9 K ~ }~ :II ~;• g hr~ ,. 'y~ ~ ~ -~ , x i:~ '~ - ^_ ` ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ i IIQCI i~ 1 ~~~ i p ~ < ~' - ~,o ~ '~ ~~ 0 Q 0 a N C .~ O °1 L xijsadri~ I!~ ~ ~~ ~i _~ ,~~ ~ .1 ~'~ ~` x _ ~ ~`'~y ~ t Qtf bl o _-- i ~ q i ~ a~ .it i q~ it y ~ ~ ~ ~ r f c i ~ c'~ J a a ~__ o ~. ~ (i ~ ~ ~ -, t -- ~- ~ =~ y 1 ~Cf1 1~ ~ i~ ~ ~ a; ~ i.. _ i~i x ~; +, o .. y.. '~i 0 1 o O I '~ a •oNOnr~ oNaNVN f NINON SOtlVA3NiA ~~c • ~`~~ ~ AA s~~y Erb Lp~C^ ~i .+y. f'~ ~;i ,~ r `, ~ ii ~ n .. ` a ~i g y e~ ~ i .iY ~ ~ S r'I i _ ~~ _ -3 q' ~ r 1 rtv Y ~ xx ~i! ~ . n try '1~~5. ~ ~ . Y~~ 1~ i rte, ~- ~ ~Y t~ ~ n 1 ~ ~ .:~ -~ ~_ r it ;' '~ ~' ! ~ ', ~,u:~ CTq _ 1 e~ CIq ili - A~ 7~ i .. t '` n ~ 3 ~~ r ~ THE RANCHD CUCAi1DNGA PLANNING CDiIMISSION 411LL BE HOLDICG PU2L:C HEARINGS AT I:OO P.M. ON APRIL 13> 1988 pT THE LIDIlS PARK CDNNUNITY GUILDIDIG LOCATED AT 9151 (jpS"c LINE RDAD, TO CONSIDER THE FOLLD:'IING DESCRIBED PROJECTIS): ESSMENT ANO VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-03 - CITY OF - amen en o e is or a ommun y an ex mo y ng nt regulations for Low-Medium and Medium Residential. 1L`lYONE NAVCiG CONCERNS OR AUESTIONS ON THESF aRn.iFrTC rc Ei7000RAGED TO CONTACT THE CITY PLANNING D[V1S[ON AT U14) 989-1851, OR VISIT 1HE OFFICE LOCATED AT 9340 BASE L1NE ROAD, UNIT B. ANYONE WISN1iJG TO COMMENT 0Y THESE PROJECTS IS E17000RAGED TO ATTE;iD THE PUBLIC HEARING OR SllBMIT A LETTER TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. GITY OF RANCHO NCA110NGA. POST OFFICE BOX 807, RA;iCHO CUCJL'10?1GA, CALIFORNIA 91730, PRIOR TO SAID MEETING. * ~ GTTY n9 vav!'t1n n.r~vn,,~, PART II - INITIAL STL-Y ENVIRO[v^fE:rTAL CHECKLIST DATE: "J ~ 70 v(J /~ APPLI C.'.:T: (~' ~~ c~ ~+'~X GIC/~ C. UGff 74LGX eiG•-- FILIRG DATE: /' _LOG WfffiEA: VV G ~/J" ~y /x,,0,3 PAOSECT: ~XP-1((,(,'/~L~`~ I~~GC ~)7/CaMe6lLl~~j ~L4K L/yI ¢/~'/ 77~ PAOSECT LOCATIOA: t~A I. E:A'IROS!~HTAL I!9'ACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES fL4YEE NO 1. Soils and Genln¢v, Ni 11 the p:oposa/ have sign is icant results in: a. GnsCable ground condi[So ns or in ehana ac in _ geologic relationships? / b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction oz burial of the soil? -L c. Change in copography cr ground surface contour in[e rvals? ~~.. d. The destruction, covering ox modif lcatlon of any unique geologic or physical features? ~ e. Any potential Snc rease in wlnd or water erosion of sof ls, affecting either on oz of: site condite ns? / ~. Changes in erasion siltation, or deposition? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the race of extraction and/or usa of any mineral resource? / 2. Hyd roloey, W111 [he proposal have sign if Scant resoles in: • ~ Page 2 r YES uAYBE RO a. Changes in currents, oz the course of direc cion of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral scream channels? v b. Changes in absorp cion races, drainage patterns, Oz [he race and amouni of surface water runoff? c. Al sera f.ions to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change Sn [he amount of surface water in any f body of water? e. Discharge Sn CO Surface waters, or any ~ alteration of surface water quality? _ f. Altetacion of groundwater Characteristics? / g. Change in the quantity of groundwaters. either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction ir, the amount of water other- wise available for public water supp Lies? _ i. Exposure of oeoole nr nrnnerrv r...,~re~ related hazards such as flooding or seiches? ~~ 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant resulcs in: a. Constant ar pariodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? __ SCaC10ne[y Sources? _~ _ b. Deterfo ration of amb Sent air qualify and/or in [erference with the attainment of applicable air qua licy standards? _,/ c. A1[eratlcn of local or regional climatic Bend pions, effect i;~g sit mu vemenr; moisture / or tempera to re? _ 4. Biota Flora. Will the proposal have significant resulcs in: .1 a, Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number J of any species of plants? _ _ b. Reduction of Che numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ • 7a ee 3 YE$ ~aY6_ VC c. Inc reduction of nep or disruptive species of - plants into an area? _ d. Reduction in the po cencial for agricultural produccicr.? _____ _ Fa urea. Will the pzoposai have significant results in: a. Change in the charac [eras tics of species, inciuding diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? _, b. Reduction of the numbers of any urieue, rare / oz endangered species of animals? __ _ c. Introduction of nev or disruptive species of animals into an area, or resu'_c in a barrier ~ to Che migration of movement of animals? ~ Deterioration or removal of exis [ing fish or d . vildiife habitat? _ ~ 5. Poouiarion. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the propesal alter the location, distri- bution, density, dh~ersi[y, or grouch rate of the human population of an area? L b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or ~ create a demand for additional housing? _, _ 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or co®erc ial diversify, tax race, and property values? b. Will project costs he equitably distr Sbuted among project benef icf ar les, i.e., buyers, / [ax payers or pzcj etc users? !, _ 7. Land L'se and Plannine Considerations. Will the proposal have signti is an[ results in? a, A substantial alters clon of the present or / planned land use of an area? _ b. A conflict with any des Sgnations, objectives, polic Ses, or adopted plans of ar.y governmental entities? __ - c. An impact upon the aulalty or quantity of ex is [ing consumpt lve or nun-consumptive / recreational opportunities? _. _ • ~ 2age TES ?L4y3r VO 8. Transporca [ion, Will the proposal have si¢n ificane results Sn: a. Ceneratlon of 5ubstant ial additional veh Sculaz / / movement? VVV b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for / 1/ new street construction? ~. Efforts on existing parking facilities, or / demand for new parking? r/ d. Subs[antSal Smpact upon existing transporca- Lion systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- Cion or movement of people and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or / air traffic? g, Increases in trafflt hazards co mo tpr vehicles, / bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have eignif icant results in: a. A disturbance to the ante grits of archaeological. paleontological, and/or historical resources? ~ 10. lteal:h, Safety, and nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or po cential health / hazard? V b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _. c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an act Sden c? d, An increase in the number of individuals or species of vecto. path cncgan ^ organisms or [he exposure of people co such / or ganfsms? e. Increase in existing noise levels^. -_ f. Exposure of people to poten[Sally dangerous noise levels? g. The creation of objec[ipnable odors? h. M increase in light or glare? ,/ • Page 5 `•'95 Y45'BE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significanr yes ui cs in: a. The obsiruc ti on or degradation of any scenic vis is or vies? / G b. The treat ion of an aesthetically offensive site? -- / -• A mna lc[ with [he objett ive of designated or po ten [tai scenic corridors? 12. U[Sli ties and Public Services. Will the proposal have a signi.f icant need for new systems, or alterations to the following; a. Electric power? b. Natural oT packaged gas? c. Communications systems? L d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? -./ f. Flood control structures? ,/ g. Solid waste facilities? / h. Fire protection? i. Police protection? a~ j. Schoo Ls? k. Parks or other recieacfonal facilities? _ 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including _ roads and flood control fac111ties? ~' m. Ocher gove rtuaencal services? __ / 13. Ener¢t~a nd Scarra Reen~_.~e~ Will the i _ __ /CVUUSa have signat icanc results in: a. Use of sub scan[ia1 or excess h~e fuel or energy? b. Subs tan[ial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? ~1 c. An Snc cease in [he demand For development of new sources of energy? d. An Increase or perpet uat Ion of she consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? ~J e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Mande corv Findings of Signif Scant e. a. Does the project have the poten [ial to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or vlldl ifs population [o drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliaina to a p1anC or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plan[ or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Cal ifornfa history or prehistory? Page 6 YES MAYBE NO v b. Does the project have the poCen[ial to achieve short-term, eo the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs !n a relatively / brief, definitive period of time while long- [j Cerm impacts will endure well into the Future). c. Does the project have imps[ GS which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means chat the incremental effects of an individual proj ecG are considerable vher. viewed in connection with the effects aF oast ornje=.=, / e~~~ yiubao:e rotors projects). _~/ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause subs[an Cial adverse effects / on human beings, either directly or ind irecCly? r_ AJ II. DISCUSSION OF EHVIRONME`ITAL RVAL'JATION (i.e., of affirms cave answers to the above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation aeasures). • ` Page 7 III. DETERMINATION On the basis of thls initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signif icon[ effect on the environment, and a SEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed proj ecc could have a significant effect on [he environment, [here will not be a significant effect 1.~ in this case because the mitigation measures descrl6ed on an attached sheet have been added co the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find Che proposed project :tAY have a significant effect on the enviznment, and an Eh'VIAO\^IENI I2.TACT REPORT is r quired. C ~ , /i Date 3 ~ x0 ~ ~~ NM~'~TA~ RESEW ~ ~~ CANON T I INI`~'L S`~DY _ pAlt ..A t be comp~e"' ere this forthe odeP art tionWh the v i,,onmenta~~ittee t of 9this aPPStudy and move BENS proJeGto the Deve9oSmema spare Par¶t,etPl nninw 1;o~aveonodl5 lZ~fistal sion• or yid submieUtid aPPltcplaannin9l~oi~~s Qeclyranon Pill andinformationn!'ePthe The P sm ac the oro3 vision na ntn9 4 ecomm~ nee taste mVact~oand n,f icantt,or ,(3)menAnY hedi inf ormation tooter environmen~ll have ahe~prePa~ want giving fu PrO act 0.ePort l~ d by the aPP cU should ede Pr ject• J prop°s me ~c3 ~ ~lu^Guo ~ p~7 Date Filed: ~ e• /'~~ u ~ ~~- ProJect Title: dress. TeleDhon v Pd n ted C~'~ gppl icant~s Names o Son Tfl Be ~ Telephone of •~ e, Pddre this Pro]ect' , Nam _.-nin9 '~ Gou~- ~ ~ !~/-o~ect' // location of agencies and federal ~ ~ state No.: ~ local, re9iona•+ s Parcel .~--~. Pssessor~ its neceS~~hYPermits t,st othyrencY issuing and the 9 ~ ~ ~ ~- as 'gr; .~~ l-1 ~. , ~, ~ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL For all projects requiring environmental review, this farm must be completed a^.d submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Conission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (I) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, (2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional fnformation report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Pro,7ect Tit le:~il?~ ~ro3 Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: ~~~ Name, Address, ~eiepiwuc o~y-.S TD^ °e r^^+u'tad - r~~ Concerning this Project: ~>neeC G`~E'~'{ ~~I`'/1 /~~~'^~~-- Location of Assessor's Parcel No.: .//~F~ list other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: X//I' I' • • '~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pryppsed use or prypyp~osed pro,lect Acreage of project aria and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: .V.~-- -- - --- -- - Describe the environmental sett ino of the project site including information on topography, soil stability, plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any a fisting structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): ~,¢ Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although ind'vidually small, may as a whole have significant environmental imp act I-2 1~~ • • Mlll TNIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? - / ?. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (Douce, fire, wat er, sewage, etc.)? _ .. Create changes in the exist Pl i ti ing Zoning or General / an des gna ons? _, .L 5. Remove any existing trees? How many?- __ _~ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammab les or explosives? _ _~ Exp lanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7. Estimate the amount of sew~~e and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: NN o. Esc nna ce cne number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: /1~~- 9. Estimate the amount of grad ;ng (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubic yards: N¢ 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, co~tlete the form on the next page. CERTIEICA7ION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initiai evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional ifiormation ma„v ho rAquired to be Slibiiiitted before an adequate eva luatien,\ an be made _by the Planning Division. ~ " ~~~ ~_d-_. Oate: ~ ~0 '8£5 Signature Title-, r'.tLoy~ ~tti- - I-3 V • • .1 I RE °. iD~iiT inL U1f151Rlll.l lUN The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract Na.: Specific Location of Project PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PNASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: ;. Date proposed to begin construction: a. Earliest date of occupancy: Models and B of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range I-4