The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991/04/17 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETIPTG6 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. April 17, 1991 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ~~~ City CoaneLmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alezmder, Moyor Ao-Tem Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmem6er a~ Jack Lem, City Manager James L Aiarkmen, CityAttarney Debra J. Adams, City Ckrk City OlSce: 989.1861 lebruary 9 - 10, 1991 cLTY or RANC80 cDGMON6A CITY COONCIL MINDTHS A special meeting of tM City Council of tM City of Aancho Cucamonga Waa Mld rebruary 9 and 10, 3991 at t1u Lake Arrowluad 811ton, Lake Atrovhead, California. Tha meeting war called to otdex the morning of labruery 9, 1991. Pressnt ware Councilmemberat Nilliaa J. Alexander, Charles J. Baguet LI, Diana Williams, rameln J. WrigRt, and Mayor Denis L. Stout. Also present ware; Jack Lea, City Managed Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Managar7 Jerry e. Pulwood, Deputy city Maaager7 witA the maetin9 facilitated by Lan Wood Of Len Wood G Aeeociater. Day 1 (rebruary 9) began with discussion Exam City Councilmembere and eteff pertaining to deve'_opinq iha •ideal teams, roles end responeibilitiee, working relationships end cammuniestions with an overview of fiscal challenges facing the City of Rancho Cucamonga presented by Jack Lea, City Manager. a Day 2 (February 10) began wlth the following department heeds participating in the discussion: Jim Bart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Pinance Officer; Joe Schultz, Ca®unity Services DlreCtorf Jerry Grant, Building Official; Joe O'Neil, city Hngineex7 Brad Buller, City plannert Dennis Michael, PLCe Chieff Bruce zeiner, police Captainf and Debra J. Maas, City Clerk. The discussion began with Mayor Stout praeantlnq an overview of wAat took place during the first day of the workshop. TRe entire group participated in diecueeione relative to Rancho Cucamonga in tRe year 1000, developing goals and objectives and aetabliehinq the City's top goals. • • ~ s Clty Council Ninutes February 9 - 30, 1991 Page 2 The workshop concluded on Sunday, February 30, at 14,00 Noon. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adam, CMC City Clerk Approved: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays • 7:00 p.m. April 17, 1991 Civic Center Councdl Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ~~• City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Mayor Pro-Tem Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Cauncilmember Pamela J. Nright, Councilmember •~• Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Couneil Agande April 17, 1991 1 All itus suWilted for the Citp Gmeil Age¢da east M La aritiag. The deedllne for eubaitting thse 1Eas Se 5:00 p.a. oa the Wednesday prior to the aeetinq. The Citp cUrk•• Office rawfAea all such itua. A. cAiu m aRn~ 1. Roll Ca11: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout _, Williams _, end Wright _ 6. AMNOVWCM@6/P raeYTaxrnaa 1. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing the Nsek of April 22 through April 26, 1993 as "Blow Ribbon Weak" in honor of Volunteers. 2. Presentation of Proclamation Recognizing the Wask of Nay 12 through May 18, 1991 ae National Historic Preservation Waak. C. Cal¢RR4ICATIONB PRMI TH6 IC This i• the tier antl pure for the general publir to addru• the Citp Council. Stab law prohibit the Cilp Council Eros addrueiug any issue mt previously iacludW oa the Agenda. The Citp Comcil up receive twtiaonp and set the setter for a subsequent aeetiag. Coos¢!• ew to be Baited !o five slsutes per individual. D. ^MBm1T Car.ern>n The folloring Conant Glendar itoe are expeeled to be routine and ma-eontmverslal. Thq rill be rcled upon by the Couneil at one ties rithout dienuuioa. Anp itq uy M reaoved Dy • Comeilaeaber or seater of the audience for diaeuasia¢. 1. Approval of Ninutee: February 9-30, 1991 2. Approval of Warrant a, Register Noe. 3/27/91 and 4/3/91] I and Payroll ending 3/28/91 for the total anwunt of $996,604.12. 3. Approval to receive and file currant Invssiment Schedule 10 ae of Harch 31, 1991. .~ city Council Agenda ,4 April 17, 1991 a. 2 4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for "21" Of! Sale i4 Genera 1, Sav-On Drugs, American Drug Stores, Incorporated, Southeast Corner Nillikan and Highland. 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application far Off Sale Beer 6 Wine, ]5 Alta Lana Hini Xart, Joseph c. and Norma Romero, ti630 carnelian. 6. Approval of Settleawnt Ct Claim: Charles Little vs. ]g city of Rancho Cuoaaronga. 7. Approval to assign an Adult Crossing Guard at the 19 Intersection of Carnelian Straat and La Vlne 9tzwt fos Carnahan Elementary School. B. Approval to authorize Appropriations from Account O1- 24 6451-3455 Ln the amount of $1,500.00 for False Alarm orainnnee Expenses. 9. Approval of the Environawntal Initial Study Parts I and 25 SI for the proposed 7th Street Storm Drain and ATSP Spur Crossing Improvements between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue, antl issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLUTION NO. 91-094 26 A RESOLUTION OF TH% CITY COVNCIL OP THE CITY OP PANCFIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE BNVI RONNENTAL INITIAL STVDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR TH6 PROPOSED 7TH STREET STOAN GRAIN AND ATSF SPUR CROSSING IMPROVe!ffiNTS BETW88N CENTER AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, A PART OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1 10. Approval of Aaeolut ion authorizing the City Engineer to 39 cause rho complstiOn of the Sewer and Storm Grain Improvements required by the Condit lone of Approval of Subdivision, Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394, located on the northwest corner of ease Lina Aoad dad 8tiwandn Avenue, a development by the Barmakian Canpany. ~ ~ ~ City Council Agenda April 17, 1991 P 3 RESOLUTION NO. 91-095 4i A R830LUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHOAIEING THS CITY ENGINSHA TO CAUSE TNH COMPLETION OF THE STOAH DRAIN AND SEWER PIPBLINBS LOCATED NORTH OF A.W PARALLEL TO TI03 CENTER LINE OP BASE LINE ROAD HETNEEN VICTORIA PARK LANE AND BTIWANOA AVENUE 1I. Approval to terminate a Profeaalonal Service Agreement 43 (CO 88-070) with Peomee and Aaeociatas Por Engineering, Planning, and Design Services relating tc the updating of the City's Master Plan oL Drainage £or the Cucamonga, Deer and Day Creek areas. The project's contract amount of $258,300.00 was funded from the General city Drainage Fund (Account No. 23-C 637-8766) with pertisl reimbursement of $75,000.00 from RDA (Account No. 11- 50300). 12. Approval to execute Aelmbureament Agreement for 44 Inetnllation of a portion of Master Planned Storm Drain Pacl litiee in connection with development of Tract 33367 located in Amet hyet Avenue ai Highland Avenue submitted by Homecoming Partners Limited - DAA-15. ABSOLUTION N0. 91-096 46 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RBIM8Uk5SMENT AGRESI44NT EXECUTED ON MARCN 11, 1991 POR THE INSTALLATION OP A PORTION OF RASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITIES LOCATED IN AMETHYST AVENUH AT HIGHLAND AVENUE 13. Approval t0 execute Reimbursement Agreement for 47 Undergrounding of a portion of the warhead Utility lines located along Beryl Street at Traveler Drive in connection with development of Tract 13602 submitted by Hix Development Corporation - UR-011. RESOLUTION NO. 91-097 $~ A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSS!ffiNT AGRESNENT BYBCUTBtl ON MARCN 18, 1991 POR THE UNDERGROUNDING OB A PORTION OP THE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINHS LOCATED ALONG BERYL STREET AT TRAVHLER OAIVE ~r ~ City Couneil Agenda Aprll 17, 1991 4 16. Approval Lo execute Improvement Agreement Sxiension Eor 51 Tract 13440, located on the northeast corner of Eenyon Nay and Lark Driw, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development. 53 RBSOLVTION NO. 93-095 A ABSOLUTION O! THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVBMBNT AGRBEIl6NT EYTBNSION AND •ueww....... CL_...:.. ~3o inner la eau 15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 6xGnaion for 54 Tract 13898, located on rho northwest corner of Lemon Avenue end London Avenue, submitted by Mlzrshi G Say. RBBOLUTION NO. 93-099 56 A ABSOLUTION OP TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP AANCFIO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVENENT AGREENBNT SYTSNSION AND IMPROVENBNT SBCVATTY POR TMCf 13898 15. Approval to execute Tmprovemeni Agreensnt Extension for 57 DR 87-34, located on the want aide of Archibald Avenue south of Bnee Line Road, submitted by ARCH, Ltd. ABSOLUTION NO. 91-100 59 A RBSOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF TR6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORN:A, APPROVING INPAOVBHENT AGR66ldNT BXTENBION AND IHPROVBMENT SBCVRITY POR DA 87-34 17. Approval to accept Improvements, Releaae of sonde and 50 Notiee of Completion for Tract 11734 located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Atrow Highway. Releaae: Paithtul PerEormanca Bond $382,400.00 Faithful Perfoxmenca Caeh Bond 9 6,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 5 18,240.00 Nairttennnce Guarantee Caah Bond S 600.00 f - city council Agenda April 17, 1993 5 ABSOLUTION NO. 91-101 61 A ABSOLVTION O! THB CITY COUNCIL OP TI$ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFQRNIA, ACCEPTING THE PVBLI(` IHPROVE!¢NTS FOA TAACT 11734 AND AUTHORIEING TNB FILING OP A NOTICE OP CONPLBTZON FOR T!$ WORK 18. ApprOVal to accept Improvements, Releaee of Bonds and 62 Notice of Camplet ion for Tract 12671 Traffic signal, located at the intereett108 Or allllaen avenue u,u oaaa Line Aoxd. Releaee: Feithful Performance Bond (Street) $100,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantor Bond (Street) $ 10,000.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 91-302 63 A ABSOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF TF~ CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING THB PUBLIC IHPROVELOZNTS POA TRACT 12671 TRAFPIC SIGNAL AND AUTNOAIEING THB PILING OF A NOTICB OF COMPLBTION POR THS WOAR 19. Approval to accept Improvements, Releaee of eontle and 64 Notice of completion for DA d7-44 located on the eoutheaat corner of Haven Avenue snd CivLC Center Drive. Release: Paithful Performance Bond (Street) 5148,000.00 AHSOLUTION NO. 91-103 65 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OP N11NCR0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFOANIA, ACCHPTING TfDI POBLIC IMPROVBNBNTS POR DA 87-44 AND AUTHORISING TNB PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLBTION lOR TRB NOAK 20. Approval to accept improvements, Releaee of Bonds and 66 Notice of Completicn for DR 88-13 located on the north •ide of Trademark PerkWay betwen Reven Avenue and Nlneton Avenue. Releaee: FBSthful Performance Bond (Street) 5396,767.00 ~~ city council Agenda April 17, 1991 6 RESOLUTION NO. 91-104 67 A A830LUTION Op THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNB PV9LIC IMPROVENBNT3 FOA DA 88-13 AND AUTHORIZING TIRE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COHPLBTION POA THE WORIf 21. Approval to accept improvements, Aeleaea of Bonds and 68 Notice of Completion for DR 88-14 located on the norc nrrrc wrnrr ei wrcnaaaia avenue ana ocn attest. ReUUe~ Pa ithful Perfotmance bond (Street) $ 18,900.00 RESOLVTION N0. 91-109 69 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY 07 IUNCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUSLZC IMPAOVElRNTS POA DR 88-14 AHO AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICB OP COMPLBTION POA THE NORK 22. Approval to accept 2mprovemente, Raleaee of Bonds and 7~ Notlca of Completion for DA 89-10 located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $164,000.00 71 ARSC~i10R RO. 91-100 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNB PUBLIC IXPROVBHENTS POR DR 89-SO AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OP COlU7LSTION POR TAE MORE 72 23. Approval to accept Improvement e, Ralsaee of sonde and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 9996, located on Cabroee Place south of Nilson Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 74,000.00 Letter of Cadit' $ 9,400.00 y~ ~' Oicy council Agenda April 17, 1991 7 RBSOLDTION NO. 91-107 73 A RHSOLUTION Op THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCA/fONGA, CAL IPOANIA, ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IMPR0V8lBNTS POA PARCZL MAP 5996 AND AUTHORIZING TH8 PILING OF A NOTICH OF COMPLHTION POR THE WOAA 24. Approval to salesee Maintenanco Bond for Tract 13825 74 located on the south •itle of Plnch Avenue betvoen Hexmoee Avonue ana Ei n~n..~ ~•~Op0]. Relenw: NainUnance Guarantee Bond (street) S 3,500.00 25. Approval to file a Notice of Completion for the Ranchc 75 Cucamonga Civic Center antl Public Safety Facility Project, Contract No. 87-173, with Barry Construction RBS0LUTION NO. 91-108 J6 A RESOLUTION OF THd CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OF AANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH8 IMPROVEDfENTS POR THB RANCHO CVCAMONGA CIVIC CBNTSR AND PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TH8 WORA 26. Approval to accept the Baee Line Aoad and Rochester 77 Avenue Traffic Signal and Safoty Lighting Improvement Project, Contract No. 90-074, as axcpleta, extend the Faithful Performance Bond for one year in lieu of Maintenance Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the Ciiy Hngineez to file a "Notice of Caoplet ion. RESOLUTION NO. 91-109 78 A RESOLUTION OF T1Hi CITY COUNCIL OF Tk7E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CAL IPORNIA, ACCHPTING THB PUBLIC INPR0VEM8NTS POR BASS LINE AOAD AND A0CHBSTBR AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAP&TY LIGHTING CONTRACT NO. 90-074 AND AUTHORIZING TNB PILING OP A NOTICB OP COMPLBTION FOR TH8 WORK rr City Connell AgOnde r ~" April 17, 1991 S g, CONE61fr oEDIMANCEe TDO iollovinq OrdlndneO~ AarO AOd puDlie hurin9O Ot tbO tLO of firOt rOading. E000Od avadingO ArO OEpOClOd to bO routinO and aon-eoatreOOraidl. Tbq rill M actOd upon by tbO Couaeil at Ong Liao without diOeuuioa. TAO CSlp ClOrk will rod tbO titlO. Anp itu can bO ruo~Od for diOCUUton. No ItOmu 9udnLttOd. F• ADVERTZeBD PUELZC 18ARIN0/ TAO fo33oriAg itMO ba~O bOOD Od~OrtiOW Alld/os poOtW aE public 6Onrings a rOQuirOd by lOr. TAO CbAir will opOn thO rOLinq to r~cOi~O public tO~tfaonp. 1. CONSIDEAATZON TO APPROVE TNB EEISTING PARR DBVELOPMENT 79 PE8 SCNBDULE TO REFLECT CURRENT PARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS pBR ACAS AND LAND VALUATIdiS [CoatinnW trams April 7, 1991) RBSOLOTION NO, 91-091 8~ A AHSOLOTION O! TNB CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO CL•CAHONCA, CALIFOANTA, 86TAELISHIN6 AVSAAGB COST PHR ACRE TO DEVELOP PARR LAND IN RANCHO CUCANONGA AND ESTAHLZSNING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE BY LAND USS DBSIGNATION TO ACQUIRE PARR LAND IN RANCHO CUCAHONOA 2, g)75IDERATION TO APPROVE BSTABLISNING A TRANSPORTATION 82 DSVBLOPMBNT PB6 RBPLACING THE CURRBNT SYSTBM DEVELOPMENT pgg (COntinuOd isw April 9, 1991) ORDINANCE NO. dd5 (eOCOnd roading) 86 AN ORDINANCE OP TRB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CHAPTER 3.2R OP TFtE RANCHO COCANONCA NUNZCZPAL CODE, TO PROVIDE POA CITY-HIDE F883 POR TRANSPORTATION FACILITI88 BASED ON TN8 CITY N8EU3 PAOCEOURE " city Council Agenda April 17, 1991 9 AEBOLUTION NO. 91-09Y ~ A REBOLUTION Or T10 CITY COUNCIL O- TIHi CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, S6TABLISHIN6 CZTY-NIDB TAANBPORTATION DEVELOPHBNT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT6 WITHIN THE clTr or RANCHO wcAMOncA 3. CONSIDER-TION OP R I%)NIRNT 8E NQ7T OENe 98 PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT RNISION 90-03A - CITY. O! RANCHO - In accordance aith Artlcls 10.6, eeetlon 65588 of the Gllfoznia Government Cade, • rwision and update to the Clty Eourlnq Element hu bwn prepared. Tha changaa to the dxuawnt tnciude~ An update of the Technical Appendix eonsiatinq of documentation and analyaie of currant dsaographic trmde, Ketlstlcal Snformation and houslnq uslstance needej update and rwielone to the City's housing ob~ectivaa and polleiu~ and developaunL of • flvs-year action program daalgned to implement the City•• overall houalnq goal. In addition, atntt recommends issuance of a Negative Declaraslon. RESOLUTION NO. 91-110 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GBNEIUL PLAN AMENDNHNT 90-03A, Tb REVIBE AND UPDATB TNB HOUSING 6L610SNT IN ACCORDANCE HITH ARTICLE 10.6 Or THB CALIFORNIA CAVEANMENT CODE, AND ISSOANCB OF A NSGATIV6 OECLAMTION, AND NARIN6 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT T~RSOr a. POaLIC HE.a4IMG8 Tha tolloriaj items Lave no legal publicatio¢ or posting requirameata. SAS Chair sill open the sesti¢q Lo receive public teatimenF. 1. CONSIDERATION TO EBTAELISH A SPEED IMIT OP 60 R OR 134 RI .A. AVENUE IRON AR¢Er.I N aTREET TO a PPHI x S xET ,t`~ Oity (:OnaCil AQanda April 17, 1991 30 ORDINANCE NO. 646 (first reading) 136 Ax oRDxNANCa or xtu cxxx coUNCIL or Txs clTr Or RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALxroRNU, A10ND1N0 BECTION 10.T0.020 Or TH6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA rACI6 SPB80 LIXITS oX CERTAIN CITY STAEET9 a. cxT: MAMaOS~E [TArI R~ORTE The follaviag 1lra do r! legally ragaira nay public keatiaoal, although the Chair aq opao the artlag for pabllc loput. 1. CONSIDERATION Or E7LTENHION Or BALL rIELD LIGRTI116 HOOA9 141 aj" RBD HILL PARR BY TNO NODRB PER NIGHT BETNE[N JOLY 7TH AND JOLY 26. 1991. Ae REODlBRNDiO BY THE ..PARR AND RECREATION OOMMISHION (OOntinvad irce April 3, 1991) 2. (Qj{S IOEMTION Ol SRAT680ARD R[COMM[NDATIONS AS PAESENT60 145 @Y Tlfll' PARR AMID 1USCREATj_Q~COIOIISSION - In May 1990, the Park and Racsutlon Coamiulon war directed to aiudy the akatsboasd Laue and Drinq beck racammendstiom to the City Counnil. l• COOMCIL EUeIE666 TDe folloring SkNa hate Deaa saqurtW by the city Council for diactlaaim. They are vo! Pabllc hearing itaas, although the Chair rY open the eeeting for public inpvl. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AOTNORIEE THE PURCHASE OF LOT 31. TRACT 149 13930 rAOM NINBROOR ZN TB[ AMOUNT Ol 5141.000.00 roR TBE 8EI6KA' TIdI Or TA6 L[DIO ROUSE AND AUTHORIZE TBE MOVZNO AND [l~ABILITATION Or THE HOUSE (Continued ftRal April 3, lffl) Thie Se the Lisa for City Comeil to identify the itau they Nieh LO discuae at the aart aaatinq. Thane itgE Y111 not M diecaned at thin rating, only identified for the serf rating. Y - City Council AQMaI Apr11 17, 1991 11 L. COMINNIGTIONe FApI Tit pUDLIC This !e the tiae sad puce [or the general public b addreu the City Couaeil. flab lav prohibits the Cily Council tram addresaiag say issue sot yre.iwely laeludad oa the Ageada. xhe city couaeil mar reoei.e eeacsmaay aaa set w. ott.r mr • aubeaqueat meetia9• Cameeata are b b limitW b fi.e rlautee per 1adi.idual. L. IWlww,sfr I~TIN6 TO aalooNr TO ^iNCIRIgi NN/AIOM TO DSNCO{N POIi0/1NQ. MATTN7tD AND AlO1tTN COIQLNf iJIND ACg1fIAITION. I, Debra J. Adam., City CUrk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby wreify that a true, accurst. copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 12, 1991, wventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Cod. SC953 at 10500 Civic Centsi DriVa. e e i i + / i i J / i / + .. i w+ y+ ai / 1 1 I PoenNno rNapoNOOpo.mNee.erJ eheNeee.menNOeDpN O iii NPJO +wo•ehoNeppNmeeaeaPOO NremNNNehDNaeoeor •</ he haaPPPNpNeaNNNhOnTNNrehaN.hNYmNNnP<Om00 \• O POONam ONtlnP hNmNTpNOtlI.mNPNMNhN NPmOP N• T r V V Vr N a r ~! h N T PN \• HJ J T M w N •i) N • 7 N /~ n 1 N A A JNP Y•pJl•• V P OrNTlMtl OrNTrMNhpPO~JNTrNtlhmPpwNmlNtlh•PONNTlNtlhpw _ Y ~ WOP ~p p wpPPPPPPP PSSSSSPFP~&R'g&&&&$~°w°e °e 888°on°om°8ouu renereoc re ¢+ mmmmm ATryTnmTmmTgTTTTmmmgmar•aa .VII. ••aVrl.a ONN NNNNNNnNN NNNMNNnNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNnNnnNNnppNNNNNNN I mlm • I• • • • m • W NN N / Z V ~0 Y. NY h q N Z6 \Z ¢a2 i • p Z N+Z 4< T• ZmNp NV Q Va N N •ZN N V Z N\Ph Z\p Z N r N ami NN9 ~¢Y V•'J JW / w J¢Z b J Y t p w0 hn > N O U S V L • W Nw z• O WS D r Y n N6U N N 2 p V NiWa y¢ NV \NN eR '1T p\ \ SNP 1 zh V O r JVZrZWOY li¢ ~ iFNni~ Z J NZ m\T wM\ n < V ph r nNf wwV N m 1 e: ~a m rrcn oiNHm am ~ Vpl N V6w W fi ¢ PiY > : w •\P6: w\ OLmN ¢ P • O 00 \N\ >N W6 of JJ •J r f O<O T} `LLVµW Z 1P ' J[ R: nmlTry \N\O C~G µ h wJw \~J mmmpmW\yN\ LO N Y Yf¢e\ FUOOim WV NOSWVaT m ~ mUC• WLL NNMW rVMM O W a wJ¢ W ¢ O O LLwN <Omh W\ N W o ¢1.9 aZLLUW Wq~ LLf LLOVa •\ LhOR6MiWNi LL• aLLNi S ZL i o N R µNq a M Z 2 T MWh R Nwiieyp<FY.µw iN ¢pii :sgLL j¢ V¢ N fNww NLL> WL Y Y¢N > ~ fO p 6 ~ Y _ 1¢LLV LL f~LaOU N OQaV WNf .OJ UJZV NizwfT J<10 j F V• O • wN0 r jN <= L JOwiJ NJ 7w6 J¢Wp O r03 JWµJ10JJNr 6 ; YOWWI DZJLLLYVUJ •mDY00JO Yrz ul~n V O µ O V' w eMN M w J "' mZNWZUp VY.>V UJZYO¢0}WJti p V 0 V z PpSW NUN¢ NiG>,.If NMZWYOi ZZNWZNw I 6 < N7 Ji• IOWN¢FF LrLYw O<apZOJ¢• Yh> p> YJVOw OhmZSN}ii iJfOOiLWY7vff¢<>JiZUwpµS<JLLh¢ r O 6 KWWww m C<wJ6CZ OWr6• JOOJOa JatOVO,+>wwfJ Oh ¢Yp>fff¢¢r6iNpHVYVVYY6MYLWYJUiOVpV6>¢JN ; V ~+ F O ~ V N i K O U iy Z V i Z Z F h <Y N _ i N a[ 2 y O ~ V 2 OJ ZWY r < m Wa W y • S wG N N f7 N UW> > S ~ S> MJV OVi w0 N i WZN q0 p < 2?ShZhW U z0 ?ryf WUYLLW~6W f'r V fwy~ fV 6J ZONN 7hfVpZVw ZNW afyONM VU N N UWi+Y2i2 J W n hi'/• IfµiVWmYVJ N U J •Z Om0¢Nhz¢M Y¢ WZ¢ •i• ~ Vff ~~hN 4Rm~O ~ZYOaRp •ZJJ w w ' MW ~iapUZO NQhO Y f •J¢p Y[nZZO'Oa ¢ a ¢ Z>Nh1-M1- N ~wNVa3 aJaZU<YJWO }V OWWYJI w W NS R6•W~NNYL¢ ?H m OOOJVS¢ JJS~J w'z~<O}Y yJJah W •Z• > J 2JN JL Yhj¢NYaZ¢¢NJJ Ja0 OJZ¢¢hi J JW •S• O } NODLL Oini VUJJJZi26¢ >faffWWWwwJJp0069 ffffaaW a<afa «•.fa«aanpgmgOgmpmppOppmyVVUVVUVV /Z• mPCP r•hN.YN m.phNm1-Whl-mrmmNPVNhhmPNrPPm /O/ mmN mPNJOJOOm.IN OhmFNO O>~.tl •O/ •Z• N h TTmNOnr r TN• NOOK 'OmNwO •De00NrpOh NNrNN Nm!1 NNrm Nrry JNmr nJmmmrNNmN N N W ~ + ~ O rPONmm0000 yNO N.YDNNm P000POmO000NONnOONNOODOpNh >~ ~i• H ONOO ON0000 •••I••I•••• NyONtlONPOPpNOPOy0000nOryNhNPND000NmO00H ••1••ll••••••I.1••Iw•ll•••••llll•ll••I• P n m O N f. b P N N w T 0 O M m bD Pm N.I P nl r nm i• i NNPPNdn nOHP N . • iOV V1n .0yO U i .wPNA I N NN OVn dr PN N MNNyw•NN NtlJ r w V F N• \• N• ti Hn r NN n 012 >~ n 21 •2I JOHNNVNdrmPON q N N rvNNNNNNNmM mdNdFmPOMNNyNVhs NVPpPOHNNVNd mmmnl l•I m iw • ~ aay<wNNNMNNNNNVdd.p yyy000 aalYS$ aa a I O O OOOepOpO00 V V N O OOO±ODOOOpO0000 OpOO:Opaa wN M y FNNN N N y V y ONNNNN V IN Y~Y1• I~N iN iNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN V i N NNNU N I 11NN NNU {~ •i~ <m m I m m m m• ! m m{O {m < Y Z WM wH ON Iwn y NNO i if Wy HY NPS 4 \wy Y iw Wi N:N 00 Z N >O \\mJ V n i W O PWwU• VV6 P N { SV V< V V{ J I[r O \Nm O\ M m\ m h 2 OS J m2 m O y ONV n SP YEW p i0 ~?b0 \YI J w n iNP f>1 Sw Y ~ O V > FM PV P P r O\ h UVh \y M1OWP r HN• OM= .0: I~vyi WNmN NV µ W > S vi6j Z8; r N m %m y0~ H J ? \ \ Y N J mn <\r rv Ih F' IJ <\uV P YI J• V + < YTm~r~MJ O OTM\ Om\ \J W N h Ny w i NI<hm rwN\nu NJmW N n\10 m OM JW• MN>3 VV 00 pWO W m = Om4 N ~< V LLif W Nf ~h OP W TH7J<W wOw O W Z P P \ U PDVnwq NF WP _ < Vµ N Z LLO . + i W PLLJ iWO P r i PLLO P Ot rZNm UN w0.ZVOLL NWNN OLL6w w2 m m >LL6 4mu P NHW {< PJWZWI.IIFIm Jµ ~ fPP J JJrOHJ<IJ LLOIZ NWJUwwwPWNW>~NJVJ7PNV<r P Z mV JNVm N6HNLL ZNm{R mJIrwFNi nJLL wV~ O ~wNN NUY O V NVf~w Y\Wf~>NhJONimO~OLLiLLWPi~fOLL6nyWOpi O S LLVhu U VSiNFNH •=WS'{ rJVW OUNSV O•w %W wsOOw _N II- D rLrmJUWHwwwwi VPYw Y LL n 4 _ LLYn{LL ON 00Ww WJJYmVi IUOOVJ mD UJ U VVUm>SLLrJµ ~2 Jw<O n <JV~3 UpEUJiNNVSmOW WUwI WJnmPLNU mSNµO VDmµ{ h0>HrWW6ti yHny h>w.u m F~ n~ S ZP NV • VNmWWm MaJbUJNOKJ OOLLVnJLLLL>DPfmDZZOmO20 Zfi SJf2 62>J 06p6< 9OmWW20wLLiOW O U\uwVJJw6hVOFJ rv JOINimm 'J 66oOrOYYnVhNnN>NPPY<vFV 6a W N ~ J h H H y m 2 V D Z • > J VO S N M •J6 O p rr nH ~J V NS ZSN { p 00 u i> J m '~ 6 V W N w ZW H ~ SF r0 m wi h< D H FS•[ J{ tti qW 026 22 i0 0 wVZ _ ZS J3w0<iSZ{ uVF2LL F u< hbJ O NHOH{J Z VS WniaµV M:O UUJ JW V ViYO oJEOYOVV J 2 f w _ w yU f W<>U Jl.w MlY ><LhS>•H< OwJ<S N _ ZpWJ _ Wl ONH• 2w~ON NpVJmi>PNLLJ m S VJY ~SOw w0 WwfHrJ OZDW 2 ~ 20NWiH { V~HMw ZSZV i2NnOSLL mph O{6• wS u O a mZw V o0o S S wNNfµhMH SieN26NfShiJdOr N{ VO WWrJ »Sw SNPOWNI i~rtl0 O VOSUM6W NV<OUWtW• OwW{YZ~WWi W NfNVM WJHSWWOySJ hJOVriON OiW w •i• Ohl-NMmiY» O UHw•JJOOOOOC 26NPNVNKJ6N wLOiSWYNJJSWWUgJN UV6J> J fwWWWWWVHN{fVJP Sw J Om« HOOF> •2• VU'JVVVVUVU Vy LL UOOOOpOODDOOWwwWwWWLLLLLLµ LLLLUVVVVVVi52% mt Fdmm rvmmO F >OPrON00>nN PwNmmmlyPNyNJdONyPybN~oOmn• mmOmT P.OmOOmN h.pm NmOmNrvmmONrmOyOPyymNNOmm w0• mINbP NyNFOMrOOdboNOmOONbrNNrPrynPmNrNNOLN ~3~ N NNN n n N nnNN 1n Nm mNinN N nN n.wnJM n N N n . ~ w > / / \ 1 y, `u LNP I 9!N V¢T Si f00 h JO u W :• i~ .; .; m: . 1 ~ w i ri L~ •i• •< II< •l• i i i i ~ •p• •l• u m ¢ •21 IY• •V• ~p• ~L~ ~SY I ' 6/ IO: •2t /w~ Y> hPOMaNOONOOPmpON000..~P.NhONONpNONOrraOmaNNOr.NNN000m'I NOP NNhNaON«ONOwNOV1nm NONhfOpOmMamNapNNNOOepC.V OrrOaONM w• h^aNNmM1e~~PampNmayONaVhamwam««aw0lN~:IiF:ra.P m•NimN««NVrrF ~NmanaheP e_«rv__N<_NahmPeHnm•Na~aPOwnmanaLpPew«m~NahmPOwN hhfh Nl•I. O llmepPP PPpppp PO OOMMOirO.IM wr«iM M«rI w •r rr««NNN YOGO00+000000000:00lO~00000 rr rr NH«rr««M::i+ ONnNNNNnNNNnNNnNNNNNNNNUai ImnNNN11l1MNMMN~ailN nMran N YmiN NNNN MrailnnNN m m! m a • m • a! > J«N V V P M Ita OP MS O m P CN 1•\\ «YV Nml2 \ O I\V\ ~P\N VN\ •Oi JO «V? •r N F<: W` p~a\ JM irlm NOW rr p \ N \N tT W`N` I1 JW O \WJ Pip \!fJ • m O! In tl~AW SF WLG m?W Ir m MW (r pM IN O M1 M6~M W¢N WN uuJ u 1W\ \ WY 11\ II~~.. ZHV w~j~ < • 6 NI OU~W Ili• GNa PGOw`H JWO¢ hJ •O• Sr+LLI ¢ \Ww< W J LL In NNI eNLLf\ <W •6¢N IZ_O _4NNINNN wNJ rOS rft W irW\I~ N W irN M1 N •JWCT HI W>\r WJNSM N!¢ « SnV alW mj! \«WWitl !OU ~±WW WW QN`HmN JNHmV SJSOWJ ?ZI i!J¢N„Z WOJ 1t0 Wh~2J%¢ m uJ Zp<OwM1y6 10=`WWaOh\LL V F¢hWJU ¢1 W6J2 mW¢ hNWp NP06WJ SM16 VNYW6 •Oh6LL J06 •JG 61L¢ VLLZ LL9 ILW%LLCiJ wJ7 iN 7 R lOHa LL¢ 2•J WPMO>LL >O •J OOHWWNLOphWW NUWM1 ZON M16UR h_WJnHNm VN \W6Fif riiW¢IN i¢ wMVI FCWO¢µJN61 ¢J)SWJILL~<91h ¢t rW 2 ¢VSVZtY rJVP¢Y.V JL rJ UVNhJS •W• N U!J O;_ww O_F_pOSW W OS LL 2 O ilihLW«O>W h2h0>¢OW «~ >O< J~liNi SOO<T_ JKaO Oa<SMYF W¢N~<hZ<(OFOOS m >W HmV1 IWiJW02 im2 NWCWW¢m U'l 2'YZ LLZ¢ lnVn¢MhhJSOVOHNhNOMhOOHNtlOm h_m_JfNLWOOZLYGf¢Nj N'iVi6 W O¢NZJS«M¢HSJ>2 t>SM6J>O N 6Wp¢JLMWh«2VhiM LWJ` WJUQ«6NWS OfNhtlmHUt Of OrrHOOhLOOWHO«Z 7rrZmi¢fw O>O¢O=;Q N: LLJlSWW<o00JlDWliJal OV«Wp¢OOmUJO<Jf Z«NOOTVOW!< mOi.r t~zNi vrV m6JNFiJIWT>Nn¢TLLUwZY¢U\60 a = _ H V h U H T < ~ w < W h_ _ ¢ h SU « J 2 W V U DT 20¢r M yJ J W SN N 40 \V22 J O J W NV>HT m p Mt iSVM U M G J O y 2 O rJ ¢• NW OV_ OHZ J OS OJNf VN ~ UV J• O J VZNw hf h O~¢<~ W J NJ N ( HH¢N Z NHmV SrU M1VN rW Zl w2N J7YU h % LS¢W¢_W OpJV M1ly _VZ Ww r3iSMV< <F O ~J¢ VwO~VO6 r2ii •W M•Wi9 SM1>KW _ i'lU ¢NJOJ U:W VSL~tl < >z>OW ¢MOH WLL w?H ¢VWHU Y04H¢ • TON6iw ~N PrrW>IUWh ••J WOV~tl62OOmN ~ J¢ J urt OIV22 V >FLWNWI-NN<mJL •!_!JW JIH'hL0>ii~ ¢< MW= i •2 •h~• pLL ¢NHiNHWp ••• MN •h t' WHNrw¢~ i pWOZI N•HN pOiVWIhW p0 ~p¢ rN a[W SmJUNN20VN±~WJW< w<O i:`000T¢UZ rJ •¢L VOVJZW>2u«SS¢ h000ry23 >VihVli i2h20N9YNJWHO¢ •yY~r^?O twwwNHJ%O<!!wW«ep0 __u _UW _W _WMO_00p__O ¢_O_<rr _O rrw 1 Yr[N r[~[Stl¢NYKJJJJJJJJJiCL L ( Zi ( 2 wNmOamh~N'OFNPaNamwPO<mNPIwNNNNNMPNNmhVOmN<aNmNONamm aP+r rr •~Nrr OhPNNO ~~a±ryr~OPNaaaNN000NwNNNawNar~PmH .r MP:OeF NNN«rlNwnNNOmHON~mM«ImhNr.l •• N N mVrmi NNww mV«M NHV w •« NNa 3 i oeaNwNNOONwodroa eoePOm NeeNrvorvmmeNne „ ° meemoaoaeN • .ii odmNmameeNaomarn ......... F d wmNn Nae memo.. ~ .. .. ': °: :°.. : ~ PNOl.e omm .. .... .~. eanN~PeNNeNm ~^Nm ~nNN> ~~.imdwmm i ~ oa.+~omaPNmea n an PNebmw Nian aNNrNmetlaw n NmmaN .. • p: \ n N Y = N' H N d ~ a T P • m N r N N N m O;i C• A ~~ IY n A N •_O• JmaNmMmPONNnaNahm N N tl HyMMwn~ N ~ N PONNNaNmnmPOrNnaNd a N N Niww a nmPONNna a r w a h II . iM. i. i. i HMH H. i . 4 H. iytiwMwww. iwl . a . lw ~HHHw. . . 1 a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaf aaaataaalVaaVaaaaaaaa'Iaa aVaaVaaaaaa ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNNNNMN NNNNNNNNNNN i ~ f tl m• • • ILL •• tl : Itl i J i ma w IL m nN n p • OP i. Y aW W p im J NP fW NS 2 JS N ff N WS MW OJ >V NKJ OJN Uf0 OOf 1{Y I mY LLIL WJiwo VpN 6VLLOZ nZm Wie V OV IMP f2 PJ• LLW WZN Jwi OVd i 2 V fnl Uin • Otl 7NiMm m0 NNWJVK Ki LLf 20 W nU ~ NNS i V 7frv O N _ NJ •~ i J O• JW ~ • e0 Jh Ip NO VMF• 2 mpJ JV U ZYI• p Om pJ O• IJ Of0 ii mm ONNVNW 021 JJ iU ~JW7mh PNTW ¢w Im PtN wf V IS • _ a 60 wp\i N mwWm pll\OWF i h Y1- ZI.L> N N 2m U3m NO/OJI OOr u O ~ OSN a_Nw _ Ih0 0 tl ~~ MJp N f 0 O: LL •ON ml w Vfe\W H > ~ntltl iFaJ VJUwi20 rJ JN n N w=wf m NOMWa i J mnWVa OO r N NN iYN Jh~ tl\N HpNJN~6N I2mOJ iN aJh ~ ry d rl J Y~ _ _ jiw UNN r0 WW6 wmOw~ _ NSNZOwwOdmHZJ w OVVOWaMWT LLI w LL ~O >aJ7YNp WWtlNLLLLWa w / WJV hhWr2m i w nNVVWV>Oi>V tl W Nwpe Ohw _ OHi OZhwW O w m ~TnW LLwya~ VVN~ L p U lVWNr~~X~6»6 m V1 l a Iw N 1• i J V / /i 2 ~Wm m W pLLN_p _N J. f Omrhtlhi m Ow6p __W NrW O¢ fJm » tlUVrr~ wprrLLpr\tl m mw2N NJ~J NnNV f ~f /r Nen d2ZO2WUWw0 ~OUmOODeVO>\6>r UUm6f3Nr3LLZ mYei rOwWOUNf VWOa12a0 122tlO tlJ OOOf6n j mhUmmhNUVNVOfLLOJ rJtlNNm6LOV6.'V nr72JpVpup ~~ NUVi2N mN E J J 023 f J U Our N U W U N t ~ > WN n Vi N W iri N a O N OJ _ NJ LL V WW O NAY y WW Up T i Cw fzi = m FY : 2 Nh w7 N w OI __U i3 1 'M UN J V f w NV oe .zc>°o o\ `h o c Niwwi> j V 6 a3fN U 7>W NV :2NWhw>Ypr_UWOf W00 WF FM f.)»Ww > N FN N 2 LLW JN6h Jr LL m V H'Jm• Z mwN f rtlJJZi JfWHJ _ IWfJmj 2 fpiM iNpWW• m f m IL OJ6~Y7wZ1 .fpfWhtlJf6 NCtJi OLJOp'ONi WUU WV O ONNp YWrf• Oyfe p SSLLON>F SmJmJVV •VOO SM Ow• :rZNrf Ki w~ p JV OOMp• We rw~ _ LL O N>• N M PJftl~rV L~SWNJ6tlNNN eft N NNJtlmNNWaN>WwNwLL~ f ~~N WfiWfM LLWWWitlpO O LL~f tlf2WVrmmeiw a o Ni2NOV0 J ~ ~t~ ~iwNWOWWJhf N Hj WUVtl2hfwOLiO m V JJ SwwHNNV yaVe2 2::` wuT uiJ70UV>VIO 2 UWZi k w tl~WWWffW w w i i 0 Op f fwrNN f e„ppLLrN> Z; p p OOpP6 O LLLLp ppp tlem sftltlnmf¢tltlNNNNN N..~NNn NNN NNNNNN •U• nmNNtleNTmO u. NN OH F a N.a.OmmmNO a~rv NMPaH^ NNNPNmmVnP O N wN N Pn'irv maadaN+.N MaNmNa aON ~ aN NHNNaNNr N H NH NHrv N NNNN „ NN NN • • // V INP Jam' mm =;o V SLLO aNc ci e~ S• O• O/ OomaveneoNmempPeoYNme pe.. neeeoPHNea N oo oeoNOm~e~eemNeYmwoeNn e.. eaemiao~aovine• o pamvN'ON a..oownmrviNi ~.N. ... my nN~N~"a°mn°O m•°•`a« i N N a N .. N m o N n e n JNVnwpONNNYNmnmPeNNMYNinwPmPe~NNY mrn.In wnHywytiNw~Hrm~lH rP~ItinNrpiwwPyNAwNNNNNNNNMNNNNN WIYYYVYi1YYaYY1YViYYYYiViYP1YYiYiYliaiYiia ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Y w • 1 1 m a • w w w V m m O4 J O J S f V N N O Y M U _ N 2 O M r ~ 2 J m N VSF wi 'NJ ~w J6 SFMWO nJ N •O nYOLL SO \~h nV2 VO uimYW UV ZS V ZUo w _ V V Jp ennui ww J~ L!a 6f6 ~LLm pE uV0 Z¢ ¢VOS \N KJ U O¢ u2\ NJMLL OV Kaw YOYOmI miYOLLN YJON IF e¢ OJ WONN ¢ 7JO nw LLW a Imm¢ f~VO Nn m In `O 00\ V1L 06 O+t• ¢2040 OJ2 i i¢\ YOOG mWNFIO¢OF ¢1Vlnnf V ¢'iY O miY nN w2NJ S i INmrr~W UiJON w20 IOl ¢V OmW J6 O\W mOwNm tlam JWWO naVnWiW nn WIWJtiN1-\ M1Fm Y ¢ihw RV^J 62a mOY4~ WUW ¢ OO J+~NOOf of FSay6 NJ Oan6ot OV~P J In NOVOf MJOKnf e1'• NVFwLLN OLLZ ¢OSn2Y r2• WSw UNmVtOCU6i000UJJUJ~ON OUY a Y¢VNmNJ`I6¢FNwp VLL o N u x N ~ yJ Jp YOw¢ ¢S _ ¢ S~+V NVCO ~O =O n OJM1Z N WNSW 'n VJWJK<N a~~Jf 21N iti nSw¢ m9 wwONUON OnNW< N20n SY 2 OnN\U¢OYf •VN ~J„J Nf VCtYO mi< FSV N Oif MYNV •O• aJ~ V~SwZ NI yo000;Y Z ¢O~S 6otJ<JYVOww W Or~mWOtlWNOV _On_WwYi O \2'Y re\M+[SmZ <JOY fVNJUix M n1-a Y n7N LLOSu ZEJ¢a0 O¢f wJYZK NNYY Oj NJJJm Hi~n ~i uOiNN WYy,Fm2N3¢YT > » SSl2Z iZi wNn'OYP PiNO nm~nNm'nYNnJPPm NPOnPn NOnmO.~w hNMYP Y FYNnN n OPJNNP OwnN N NneN NNNNnN N NNin ern NII .yN N N NN S V O r• `NP yim uf0 Ri =j0 00 M LLN O••C JI :; .. ~: :~ E ~E \• \~R~ f:}: O• Z• OI i• •D• `Z• •K• li• ~i~ I ~Y• V: ~O~ :re •i• •i~ pt t2• ~>• o° Do eo .i°m °ew on eaoDe Oe°e a i NOU NniNNFAa' im0 f V ua a iNn ~boDeeo>beOrNDaenoOafeeioePeeeea NONNONNV POONm000NeNNONPN delVaeNVNPONepmAINVbONNIM1rfti011~N9 muiAUNm tlmm ION N NiaNMOm~A~tiaMu u I• N N N N A • n N 1 A /• fY Y •Y• Y11i MYIiY JibwNiPOINiPiiE NNryryf NPiPOUNmfNbhiPOVNmVNONiPeNNmfnO>i ~TpNyHNryrywNNNNNNNNNNryNMhNNNNNNMNNNMNN^NNNNNNNNNNNNN mVViif lffilffliff illf if if lf1i111ffflflliiilfilf li ONNnNNMNnNNNNMMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnNNNNNnnNNNnNNNNn V I lii 1 I f I i Y> hu• •• VM1N h ui bf Wj M V FNi VSiWP YP~ II aT1~i O 2 i i N IN IVFVO P ~ nNpN NWN nl i O N f OM P~F•Z+\ L h • •Mf R O O\ Nii W • J Y ZN O Z i VVtiV VI ti R iV Vf11 • V OinNUO \ V•V O OVN O i WWVF P• )VJV VLVi• 2 J 9VW FVb O) RV •sOVVpU NV f V Vwy D N~ O ~Vi N~ VfI 1 0900SP4 IN O f JO •ZP SiV •h Ju iiiM1wNO\O Y OJ W W D••PUNiim VN iZ V W1v RYiYZiV\~ ') m? w MNN R W i0\ O "IyfY~~ •~• jF•V tfRf _ iZ_ J N o! POOR IOiOid V fW W JPN NWUVU W mI1 /\I 1WL IL V01I UJ PN •uhiM1LVLt>VdOi\Y LLy ZWFFOi Wi n V W W1L N>Sp h V> \YhW•NRJWNWRUi OOSap[JiF 006 LLLLW O pOifiVO 29 O ZtNV Z N J DLL•J•i>NPf = 000 yuR Wl\i ~ \NOOhf• ~~wN~N6NNWWOVZMm~NV •t •[ • htl OY iU if6 U dNfiDOUyVJVRL \V i f VUJ •W_WOR ti hN_R JWJN012UYWJ J Y`Y2! •nWWiPN 1L ZZS W R ~OWW~OW w FRyONOWUM1•f hNNV_UVYe NUJiNDnpN L VVy V Wh D~>)OS d006W2pW6NiOM022LWW RN ffN O 1 O C O~JI ORIL •i JnyfYZW OMWWWSNiiUUhhWw J M W F M obo s iiRit °a~iNUa Maui f~l~i .Y+~iw.2.~eiWUWatl eizwaiiida vii N rc i°O>i W ao>i aei e•sei Nwiisrc~ri~niai•ci~s:e )p i~haNissn~a ~ ~ ~ r i N ~~ iN= y•ii iu iie u W C W W J i D. h J O J V ~> o Wi YfNWWOh ~ U `W W N Sn I~NOi O.O•~VN V f V~ F L •Z 6L Oj ON SiYNVO _ NOVi2 SM J R 2 L UWfV6 ,2 JV 7 ut W UWWW W N Ff>WUOi f iIIYIF _• Mli'IZi2WZY.h N RsU O G~W )JwWWN OMWZIV :WO pjJ Ni1LhZ Wm VV N~s w yYRi•Y _N_fRi •i6001eV N u u n V p Oa VUWi VOw Wi VIIRI RiV •R eV•f •iWh VVNOW2VOi2VZF ilwVhiN WiN MOiZpW1 VW >V Y•1W NWUiYf VUROfWW1 O _ W WOOWW OSNFNNO• JWZJ JO O hzzSWRUJ Y O n pi0 f f iWli•WI• •Z6N~1 i 2 W fIS12 O• u0 • YZNWf~ WR .u V Z pOiN20i0 W u 2~ JN\JJ WVOOONO> VIJI•RI•(O Wi WVOi•LL D R R fORhVIVI WuNV SO10 SVVy~O yuNUWi+~S h yj1 O O w yOnNNiV UJYVeJVF•VJf 3p1V~lOOpi`JJJRVii'JV i i )>) V NiL))JiyR3 feefleef~~iiCnOe0i000VUVVUVVVYU N M1hh i ••PN sONU ON NRV r•NiimOPmaRVNOPOPhFVPhNm N••uN 00 f uiONO N••m OOiiOUNmI1N ObO0ofNmCNOOM1iNNi 000 h MOVOnfD N OON~wI ^010 fll wlp•1~OOiNiP~~~• 000 m m i N miry ~j^/ /IN N Nm NN W iNP 7 T t0 ¢1 4v DD Oja N; E c .. T. ~i• VI \~ a •I ¢• ~:d• arii i of • r i• r i p• tl~ ¢t i :yi rVr •i~ •i~ •Z• •OJVn POONPNenOrOmbu¢iO POrOOmOnOaOPOOwOMOOPON•rO 00MOwi OONOrNNJ TaOaOmmNOawIPNNry}wP~ NjN~tliu OPwOm •ON NNw eN P wJIPNNNPNOONnrn NON NnNn NNw m Nr N a.:aP N N .. .~ P , . r e JOOr•ry NaNOr.mPOrNNVNONmPOrNnfNOwNPONNnaNiwtlNOerynlNOwmP NOONIN NNNryNryryMwwr•MwwwwmtlOmOeemmNPONPPPNPP sn„IaaaaVaalaaaaaia~aa~aaJaaaVaaValaliaraaaaaaaaaal• O NNNNNMNNNNnnnnNNNNnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnNNnNNNNNNNNNN .. • tl) • m f m¢ f ft• SJ w V Jiw J> N O i _ V I i N 1 •O w 2 •OY A I NNn tl ON { w o ~a Oro i oN°n i N{i ~ {i NnN i .rP u• w{ ua im .r it 4NZ {ddU > d 1 S Y p• O• ¢• wN 1 Err \O ¢00 WV Y¢V o 2 N PjJdM¢ Id Sw rrE J \I> D _ OIJ e2eEl t{ 00 p O N V yOaO PI SwWd dJ NSU pIW N Iw _N6 E. y rr2 w0 JN\wZYNw?im MEJ wY.iOO~NDni\p0 LLrai )O `~ ~noJ4u •Pl eii pN.Nri{Ew W rse °`s viii»NN i i N> aiz 1 a i N '~iv~4 °s~Nrr\zWS•~~WN o oli {e4W 4 ~w a o0 ¢pJwZ> )N w\ N J Nw_N pU OG~w{ W ~wOi 2 JJNw=fn Jrii{NW wr2nJ r OIU¢iN N SV:O•LiV N10LN04\ LiiC TNNUHSF{OJ~J{V WKI{u{ZO iOWN{2{{wIN2W jfWNVwN~WwOi NNi )L rLEJpZ• w JwJiW U¢mN JwdN uw 4¢F{wOi JJVIJF Nm ¢ Yrr6 WMLLJU'u ¢VIZ w¢Vy •JiwOVT~aiW2D {L<WNU•J 'Jw Jp¢iLLiyuBUp.V f0{0J6~6{VJNrTiO d•r2 SnJ Vd0 G Yw¢ w ZirryZr«N FZ 2 wnYi)EU4JWW{{dNSVNY }OMZWT~ Ow EwV Nrr Otl '>1 ESrrE O•rVKLLff•JE Jr4WLJVWNwO7N6d dJ>02ZOOf{OWWWWWPFwWOOrpi~W<w¢wiWWY~YwwT ZWJOYWWJW) LLOY6OVJLSwrrL VZJ>NdmL)dPVJV>LdwZOtO O¢>rrp4iEVOO¢NOO l Y V J i J hV >ir i _ ¢pu iN v >e_ wz _ .r y CJ O yy J 4Z Z O{ 2~{ ~O GO N GJ ZOWW N UIh T Lw O Yi {JO 'O{ hfai VS Nf ihmUYrwiu6W{t{2{N OJYtw{ OM~Z TS•IS MJ rrVNN•r} VZr'r0 Np0 Ji JJ{ ZV} {2ZZwON¢iwOMZVVi O{¢ JOVZW{ V N{ 1Z4{ }JSf}NOir¢YNOOwiO{¢OOJNZ W24ZJlOZ• rri )JW O¢ WJWZY. i •J TUN Z4 tWZJJ• ZiWNJ Nl¢1}j¢Z OVi •{• iV aJJtl~~~Wtli •OZOIWr OZ ONZO KVY{rii NYO~ NC>OVON mi 000_ Ow i•NNN SJZ>2 `rhfnZZ{JZOI¢wii22 W~Y JZV ONFVZ •N`WN_Vr 6}}{KOfwLL}U~OMi OON{ W• 4 w NN V >J{{VVNVJ ¢JdW2{Z2JNrsW UE0Nw0000VUNiJJ66N400Z0rrWmOi WVwrrn{VJZ JDfaWO¢dr•{iNO07T22i{WKw OOOOOpOWWWwWµ4444VVV0V02i2iii2rr rr rrl ld KriKYtl2KYJJJJJJi NOONO e1.NnNNNJ~tla m0000nn,p OOmONNN00¢000OmpwwwNNNwo0m0 04 GOON{Y NN O{P wlNNmnPONnO m rrnN r N rr NrrnVr r.Ir JJ• Nw{OVgNNrr •1 N V a 7 E :; hpaeea•ampNNewaeamn¢eryrl...eeNaoapPe¢p..Paa ¢aee .<•pnr•..O OOaPOOFNpNNOmnpON•N•edOnd PawNONOVryOmmO OaNUOP+rP+PNNdaONFNOeOwOOmP0000NPaPOdOaONOdndPFP \• a. NNNONNNPwnPNPaa++NaN•d INOPamnmu+aONONONNNN N a N PN NNNr P n n \• a a• N r + n N N •I n + u •~• • / w/ F• e: i i Y• pi naNawpPerN.•aNd•-d worNNaNar-ePerryNaNawmPe.rN maN al.mPp 'ii 1 nnnnn~~~nnw~.T ~ Y'~n X Xn ~ S nTm~mn N nmm ~ ~ nik nn n' N , w , , . l • i . w • w ~ •I r ia~i~iiiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa•a•aaa ••aaaaaa••a v• ONwNNNPNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNwNNNNN Y _ __ __ Vf f f• O a • m ~ NV r w F I W6w Nw V+ Z N V W FO / L N~ J N W f { h p •P N WJ W • _ _ 0 •JF wne OJ D i > i / V 1 ri ua~ rim •m .s i a uhe~ Hw N 2 / -J f < J NO~p n Vrn FmfO fUw Z 0 iN P I O N ~ Iw •ei a~N JvN >O • N Jr\p o NUp ¢6N N 1 E / ~ O !! ~ 1 N~Sif•IJW tN1~W vJ 6m w> N4 Wfm wii Ywwi 3 j ~ ~ I YJJ YONw¢ >u OJ f2 r0 Z Vil i V J6 : Yr V < I ZW v e f / _ Na wr~< N s WryN WLLl \ Un W¢ WUf{ WO< <rVw 3 eVZ ~ O O N Sl / „ OjUI JJCN Wnr F V N a+ SLLO AO uuv O S JO N JOfJ FSd NM¢Z< ifOZ ZV V~d wV d.Z.O NwLLLL W¢ W2 N v /u Oi'Jw Oh O r d O JS• OVFw pFLL ¢ NW F i +>S yjp LZWJ h_ ei J<ZZm>62 OEW OwOLL uNhW NNNU ¢ W V mM •\ wO 0 O hW a /v • i NLW YS< t¢O•NUy 1 l VW 2 N wy~ FJ< WWV VV UW.•Z W >JhOhu 6i >NLh¢SwiL ZFJ r O :V• W v w.N wv M1yJVZNZJMZZ iuju ai UVZV ¢JM a O 7 L /w O ¢ ZJN GONr Wf pO2Ww NJfO yif w Ih>vtjOi WSWOYSZ ¢ni ~w00rf w JNF VOhNU^p¢sFVJZOeW OOLWJOY•L NKNwjO VY -J '~a0 60N di6tiLL NO i+ YY V /w• W\VUZLi>=VPNhur m •r 3J NaZph90NNh<Z OJn JNym~ <J NYNVr • M i2fUn1-O¢J/rJ¢¢FY/SO~:WM» WFWrWwO Ni• ; WLO¢LL rLi ZUeONa6iOf WVWarNWJU w¢ 000pi¢OOmJFZZ ; h r N r.0>Lf Y~i)awiWaiYLVPZV<LLNVpUOiN>Of LWZN6Yj2<GIWLLLNNNU Y • u ~ _ >V O N . r r Z <VZJZu N v J O G2i1wV w v prV<20 O V O 2 i ~ O m wIIi V t N i m 3w JhZ W 'J O O O r VOW ` t9 •VOZ14 G <a•VI YOa UVON yN i 0 J Y. FS •y WVUO hf vZ3VVwWU m i SZwU VJZ JYOJ J VLWUOZ ZVhO vtZY 3U OI 6 rich rJ2 JiF Sf<w V _ _ O w v2Yh¢N •!J¢ 2i N1-w WZW>ur r7vVW U WiOLLmO< yjy wu00{NM• ih¢h• VW VVJ >iJNwJ uiNi1 V.ZiM~6Wr0V~rJJ <•m•r JOhh~+p hW W rtiV • O Nh V JO VOJ> 2¢SJWNU'JCO ¢VM1>Y'JY pViJZ >O 1L{m p9 w u W WmYWLL JfF6f Mi0<iYNO ___p V < W1LV ivhN¢r W V e~~O~rOOw<hO~OVWJO W <Vi .WhJ u> ~ { Jw w h22pVWZ w mWm m• 2 O if Or6~ ~<OJU S pr O OOUwwO« VN UNi W<UNhiO<WwWUJ imee0<O LMWO<iViFp Jw•O¢ 1f SW<Ir Lr..« rWp\<OOMVUMLLO p2NW<fWf SY FI-NV •i• i 6NF ~OhOhfO~wVVV¢60VMZIZNWr p3JYliVVF>hiWLiZi22W t1. fUWrpOOt<OJZS « Y« SMi000p6vv¢6p rpOft<ff<VW ZI{ZIZZYZZZZi000{{>Gh¢OCiG\6{6{066{pv¢pvvRWNNNNNNNN ONONdPeNOm•NNdNNdm• rdhNNNOOrhNdaN a¢rr•rynP •O• PONraOa.•a w.M /P na.NrPPOr NarhrOmrwd+nP• •D• /3/ mPNOwnrNryemdOr•nhNNO oa^1 N eOmNNNrwO w da•NNN¢N NNM Nru wNN NN aNa+NF• nNN r• ryr N W n • / (\ / V i / I • • • 1 W• V• O/ •• i ' ° nfpeofoneofNlePwnoiaoN-0newN<N•hr n iii <• e m rwf powopeaNNemJINNNON N<rwwn •wONOOiNNN10NNOn10NrnOTfnnN<rMhOh OMm>I.OVPrfwOVNnNNNrwNOnIN mONNmOwNm NN wOw• N NgnNNww N n0 O w f O/Y \•s .. .. N o m •<• m N a;i N W• <• Z• J• p A 1~0~ N n Jw N VraPp4 r 1l OMNnINVrIwOJN nO N n w n w N V 0 • I p / p ~ W q ~pp ~>• ~pp q / ~ V ~ p • ~ p V V r 1 O ~ ~w HA N TT T % r A• ~' i o ~ i P rrl wl r >VfV rr I w mr w Nr w f 1 r I 1 11rl l 1 lrl l fl wlTT rl l /1 1 •I r /r f In1000V<iOV<IiOVw<If<•fff<wOVw1• •i ~ pNnN NMNNNNNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNnNNnNNMNNn • 4 •i/ Y / I W <1 _ __ __ < Z 1 Zi IN t w i1 I/1 V n W N 1_ M r N N • 2 O N O I _ N ` p n wiW M i 11 < <h O O > D li 2 q 1 < \ w i V O Z •00 V IM O Rwp4 Z i 1 NIY Ih IOM< J ZNP V V SD iJ0 O O \ O Z O ~ < 1 V~m _ _ _ N tNN1 V1 N W 1 lif WP O IWf WO F NyVt VJTO I V N rJU On O OJV W ~ O S N_ ±• • 9 h`n4N NV OJ O \ p• Of0 > OLL iW 1 W V 1L WpZ~ W i N jJ WOO)N NOO W YZ hOl O NON N p Ii •Z • F nOt WN Z Wi WOWN00 ~ 4 I 4rpFSFO N Ow h iOpLL IN SF N Oh~ O Su0 100 p 4p O OYUn NNyO < YYN NJN NOf<N OJOf<J ZpON<O JZOZ<JJ d O N > •M• SY O Vi IN i><V <MZpZW WV N V OU4 LLW I y I ~ON~IwINWZJWOJWiP {VNIOIN ZNOY J Ii w ON6 J W! oW Fn ZO<OWOFwFWNNFO N 2Ww NZyO <WOR PyN= LLJ<ZZ: IY <WZPINi IL LLh V rf f: N VWa J ZWO J Z \ •VNIptl i~J NJ YtFOiJO1VNWYVW LL V •O II / r+i N Iw PiSZ• Nt04 •Z S SOV<ZJ hYfMOVWNh 6.il nYiV ON•-0<YYVNnpVU O •i• = m` fJ0>IZOIWmMpi JIL OOW IV4WY >O>M W• /1-1 >W =1 hP W O41QNNiOW i •JI >fWpYWW2 >Nw fPOt>02w •ZhYOWY>W •Ow W r ~ Y/ po < ro lOwp JeinVJON<Y10W NWNOMN00) I / J J J V W •i Y 00 N 4t h V n W u h q u h< p u N O i Zp Y O p pp W V O N ~J h/~f V O r hW p 1< J I 4y 2 yI.N .hi pj NpW •ZN !2 VZ OVO 42 U06 f ZON Zi M MO4 NUN VWWSMp Z OVViWp[ <J •i •tL ZVV ~ J ZiZMF1.WW pnn up40W .1 4uzn W O npZ NFNMWN ~FipO ZN Z 6S4e0<M 2iJU ~ZN<OW iVOW00<J S W Ni4W VOh) iWUf 7Vw JO VphJ< O• N _ WIp Nr Wh<J• >Z •WZZWV IL ryVJh00pN ~JNW,,Li J4pp0 N<Oq V • J VJ6 i U>W i,9 Z 2W iYZOVV ~O • •W/ JJWS«n h40 VIO •i0>NVZ~ 6WNM /p'• NOOwIn ONPOPA1wiNIPOrOnPPNNVPPOw •0• nMPnNf NInNNOwffrINNN<IrwOM•IPOO4r~ IZ• N •nVNrOS NpnOwNNfhPMfMhrnO w N N nNMM nN wn N N nNNn J • 'Oriairal Pccr Qua{ity 'Orig~rai F~~r _ i~,:a;,ty _ - vx . - _ - .. s~~~ ~: __~~ _a ~. c. 4: '~ €, .. ..... ..~ ., w_ o m m .._..d w ., _.. T P s - s e _ ~<. R f d ~.~45_ F. _ - - ....... ° r s F 5 a . ~ .. a ~, r. .. .. ., _- ~. .. _ _ _ _ p ~ - - ~ Y c _t<s f. . ..^ : : : : " : : _k' - . . . . a ~~ ~. ~. .. . ,. - f.' k $.'' _ ~Y' Yl ~' Yv P. ~ r' ' i ~ ~ 'd ~ _ y . . . -. 9 I/ t "Original Poor ~`~.,~ir~; F. '. S. 5, /P ~jr~o;nal Poor ~aat,'Y - a x ~~ .. _ - mK r - ~s _~ - - ~4: ~: ~. m m . v S: IC is ~~ ?,cS _- - - v i n,.. t ' x _ Y k i'. " .. R 4 _ . P /~ COff . ~~ - -- w~.. wwwn. r... w. uw-w iw.4rr«.er ry +~AM'PV"%'Oh';)H~j CL'Cn of ,- I MAR,'. S '1891 r••• Y \V 7 C.Y 1-. 0 .~ .i 0 ave11NM1gM 10[ YLOIINIS[ [[Y~IY[ YreIM•IE) 1, mlPl a IKWW31 NY! N0. In e3e311erm • Atea34 b•~(Irl~I cents a,w t90°mx. '21• '% ,at[ c[N[Nat ~ roe 3Yn aeenaroing Se~r.rr.rau _.~...,........ cow 1613 r33..I.iY/Sm31I4eanlr 4rmY Amd331w AJwm 4wm1 t. MAAWN W AIRKAIRIA Try. N[[NIUM%YNYi%[i[N[[Y%IN[Y%I{YY;;~ pq pw.~~Nh~Trf.~ UNww DMn aNENIC4N nflUC STUflES. INL. (P.12) S. Sr3%f3l ar nAr3sacno3Y31 ~ 0~9 Preen lv Prsm 1100.00 •21 B 1 Ofee 2e.00 •21 !bJ-hR115lD4jT _ 3. I.rww.r a.a...-w,r.. w S..n : u .n ste n3u3eev . n.yn flen~lld'~8lj~Llge, Senr~mrdl roru •21 O. SGIa O/ WYOfN'. a" Cowry M..._.DMNGC .............____0.4.-..-_-_. ~~D~91___. _. . ..~....+r .. ..r.. d ...-...r r .... i~~ w .....sr w .. ~ Y ...~.!. Y r.. w/~ Y Y W" ~ti Mr ~• yu ~. ~Y~~n ~u M ..~ w•.w r ~ Y M~~ .r~~.~ ~~wrr.••~.~....`~.~~...a ..Y ..m~a.. w•.r r~..ry. .r.... ~~ ..., .. w ........+.., w ~..~ .r, w .m.+~•r.w.w~ MY.Y.J..N..~~.Y.W...M.W M1../~.~Y.~.m~n~Yti 14 A1N4NWpN3 ~11[NIMM DNUC ITOPCS,_ INC._~~ YY.S..SMIYICNiMr_-NeM1en1-te/IYNlr.9Nr-•~ 1!/1IC11lION ~ iN~110RY1! t[ [NN[Q OMNDC o.e__. J't0.91 __ u sun a cuenwA <.mry +_-__----.~.....______-....___ ... .w i ..w... r ... +~ .r.. ...... w ~. ....n v Y... r.. ~...~w.r~-•-+~ ~. y.,,y. ..y. ~...~, Y. ~.~ w ~r W w.F nW~ ~y4 W~ IT w 4 ~• Y ~ 4r i...a Y~14 M1wY Y~ .J • ...• r y w ..u~ ~/.~ 4.~~ W.I . Y ,..~ • nM•.~ .~ ~ i.. ~~ YM1ww~ F Y .Yr•~ In ... ~.J...YW . •+~ .r. , y • .~i. Y ~.~• I . W •~•.r .•~...~ r. Y. J/I ~ w.~Y, M ..W ~ 4r~M r. Y.... • • .M. wl+.~ w . w ...w ~Y Yom.. Y r.~. ~' ..w~ • ~ rI~ ~+M1 1..w4.~ M Ow Y .rr~ n .I IL~..1.1 )114w N.iwlN u n.wnu w ua.wwv AMENICaN DNUG STOflCS, INC. (P- ... __...... .. ~p 2J RC.Y.1. -.. N-H2J79 IVED 9n y3 bpnenie l Iut. See 1}Dllf t N 1 DryR~ e ! 9SJ71 %Yl Sen B.r~rdln 0.llw 1fAM NSirr 1'IY 11rr iw Drredret Uw Omly AewAw~ p amsw •.an _.. ---.w..,n.._._._. -- .r J i~- 1 ti~_ Y \ C M'\ ~~11 :9....1....x: -~- I~~ .~~~ i ~ ~ ~ rmmm i ~. _ ..r _~ ~ Ili i „~ ~ ~~ '.i ~~, ~' i .. Ii ~f--- i ~ '~ ~Il%.4r~ .~. ,.. , .:+v .,wn:.a, !nc./ (Say-on Jruhs) r_~~ - ..st „~_r.:_ ;iiglLard and ;?illiRen Ave. ~ ~ Victoria Plaured CommUni.ty Currently Soned; l'i lla;-e Cam:nerical i.oninR of Adjarent r•onert ies; ^ort1,: impose'+. 710 i'oot'.511 Free'.:ap / Low .^.es i:ient ial 'l/4 Du/Ac as per alas ter ?lam a:x' 7aryn RlanneG Community. Sout}~: ?~ted!u:~i ^eei~'.ont iyt 4/14 9u/Ac Victoriz Riaa~ed Community Case ?ro;;ese<i Community Facility and ^iedium Residential 4/14 Du/Ac Victoria i'lanned Community 'nest ;Aediwa /High ;<esidential 14/24 Du/Ac Victoria Planned Community /~ joetorrez 25 mar 31 N ft~ p.Y6d ~- CI+V (•'! PfiMI]HO.C11t"n ~71'~"'iYn MAR~S'I~1 ~ J I MAR 2 r RECD l Jn 'Y CY s.. i~ O [7 C t~ .~ eorY._-- ___-- ../iOLNgfi Iq ...../ D%0110Nq 1. ]N](f) OF DCNtlH}I M! Iq. r« OrfeNra d YuMOe Yves fenad 1 .!4!'rs'.q rbY03~r ON YY \s f /Ili ~ f~ sserirb, Cil. rntl • ~rruuw~ CQa bwerNeM ~=rY/~ M Irrl } N4Y:1]1 d YrrI1CNrt(A ]1.y. fr.Y MYlO. Jaep~ 0. Y IWnY 1'/fi'1 nwde }rc 91011 arM 0aw ]']~~ @ ]0edw Dan 1 rvfN}I p 1]YMSYCOdh]) ~ ~ AR 0 ] 100.00 ]0 e~i ]0.00 R hrrYNa ]1.00 Y~~~y~~ ~'liV ~~~71f! Y(t }ieraytl Mial-14rYa wilw+ {L1p CY ll ree r ~ ~ Gya~~> N]0l fr rCDY~a]m roru ~ } ]u.Ye n n.... utter ~ 1. ,»nrw. MU.. r. b... w nw ewe r.rbr w • wryr lo. n... ~ w w.obr ary r r pa.i:sn a +~ AYeiefr MpaYe CaYla M r .erllaYr N IM 4fwlebr fn ~,, It. [fie e'stl` eYVr b Yw f a » r w elbaMenl eYIA 0aY V Ieee.~ frl r NW epf0odr. I ~ 1]. •pYM eYew NI IAa r] 4rR gbnl : s.L Oawe/ ywir. a0 Ywr w M yueMaM. d a saen.en N M1I Hul 4.01 eol vlelrb r tOnv r b ti vlrleei a M d Ib YkaFalY CwYd M. '~ 1]. SuII d CuIDr/Y Cmwry d ...___ urfO~_._._..._.~_..0e.___rLLdi ~_ h'wrYi .N~r~e~ Yr Y . ~e ~.J r r.. +. wr`wrr Y~.`.~w~~ 1Y Y .per reef. w~. 4 wr .Y w .r .nom M . Ir v w AY.. w+•~ W r .~rv w n~ r i~ r errY Y M ~MMfle Y Y.1 w• Yr. ~ w ~ r enYw a µr ~ .r L .; nf~. M .rl~e w ew.f .:...r.+w"iH'wd y...Y we.r ...Y.w... r, r. w._. ~.. ~:... ..»~~Y wa.. ~~. I •/K]C~YION h' 7WA161011 1} ]!YR p GNigNY Cagy r..__.__._... .......................Oeb...__ _______.__._ ~ ,.. r.e. • a. +....• w~• i ... r ~ ...ri...Y. ~ r +.e1 Y w Yiw/.e .rw. ~M W.~ w ~. M .r~r y~ ~T 'r 4 4Jr ~~ .r/eW w rJ rr e ~ v+14 ~Y~ a .r.~ r~ n Y ~~ ale r~nl r r+~ V +W~ ~ ~ I ~ ee+~ er w Kr. W ~ w/e ~~ ~ n~w~r..rb F YY w ~Yry Y ~~~ i ~ ~ ~ r. 4w eLrr w .r~ ti ~~orws I ~e~ ~Yne.r .~+. ~rYOw~~ ~ .r4e. i~_r rA ~W+~~ rr Y •M.. 4 wY w. .M'W e Y Yer.Y ~ renti Y!r ~ Y Mir. /~ 41Kt~r14 bier i0Y ]Jep /Yr Df/rawe Vr Qy Y}deir ^ 0rr~r/rdY4 ^ IVWI P/rY // ~~ ^Fw+W• wur __O~r r._._ _buM IM ..~.~._~_~_ r N Pomona 1st Federal Bob's Big Boy 19TH AI.TA LOMA MINI MART 6630 Carnelian Rancho Cucamc nqa, CA 91701 Prr. perty Currently Zoned: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning of Adjacent Property: North: frwy. & Low Residential South: Neighborhood Commercial East: Ne~9hborhood Conenercial West: Low Residential APNN 202-5G1-5A J W 2 K 4 U S. Ramirez 4-10-91 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s~a~~~~ ~~~~~t~ DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM: CHARLES LITTLE V5. CITY OF RANCHO CUC ONGA PFrnWFNn~TT11M The City Council authorize settlement of the claim in the amount of 58.500.00, to be released upon the receipt of a release from further claim signed Dy Charles little. BNCKGROUND In July 1990, Gary Varney, Street Superintendent, was involved in a traffic accident with Charles Little while operating hfs City vehicle. Subsequent investigation revealed that fault for the accident rested with the City. As a result, the staff and Carl Marren and Company (the City's claims administration firm) immediately began to work with Mr. Little in an effort to settle the claim without litigation. Mr. Little was open to the possibility of settling the claim without litigation and has been cooperative with the staff and Carl Warren and Company representatives throughout this process. Mr. Little sustained minor bodily injuries as a result of the accident and has been in treatment far those inju rie5 and recently released from treatment. As a result of his release from treatment the case is now ready to De settled. Rc pre Santa ti vcs fro; Car' :;ar ren and Co;rpe ny .have evalua *_ed the settlement value of the case and have recommended a settlement amount of 58,500.00 (this includes payment of his medical bills and a minor amount for his inconvenience). Mr. Little has been contacted regarding Lhe recommended settlement and has agreed to settle the case for the E8,500.00 and not pursue any further litigation. Staff feels the settlement is appropriate and that litigation would only drive the settlement value of the case higher. Therefore, staff i5 recommending that the City Council authorise Settlement of the case at the $8,500.00. Respec fully su it d, Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH/d ah CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF R~P4~ZT GATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Bob M. Porter, Assistant Engineer >;,,~A SUBJECT: Consideration of the assignment of an adult crossing guard at the intersection of Carnelian Street and La Y1ne Street for Carnelian Elementary School RECONEIDATIgI: The Public Safety Commission recaamends an adult crossing guard at the intersection of Carnelian Street and La VTne Street for Carnelian Eleaentary School. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In April 1991, the Public Safety Commission reviewed an investlyyatlon into the need for an adult crossing guard at Carnelian Street across La Y1ne Street for Carnelian Elementary Schooi. Based on the investigation, staff recommended that an adult crossing guard not be placed at this time. The Public Safety Commission considered testimony from Carnelian PTA representatives along with staff information and decided that an adult crossing guard should be assigned to that location. The current annual cost of a crossing guard averages 24,300. The estimated cost of the crossing guard program of 24 guards for 1990-91 15 5104,500. Respectfully submlt,2ed~ CCY '// NJO:BMP;sd Attachment: Public Safety Commission Report CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SfiAFF R~YORT BATE: Apr11 2, 1991 T0: Chal rman and Members of the Public Safety Comm ssi on FROM: Paul A. Raugeau, Traffic Engineer BY: Bob M. Porter, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: C~ Report on study for an Adult Crossing Guard for La Vine Street Crosswalk at Carnelian Street That an adult crossing guard not be assigned at La Vtne Street and Carnelian Avenue at this time. BACKGROUND This report 15 1n response to a request of the Public Safety Commission at the meeting of March 5, 1991. An Adult Crossing Guard Study was conducted at this location. An adult crossing guard would normally not be ~ustlfled at a crossing controlled by a stop sign. However, the crossing was studied considering both stopped La Vine Street trafftt and right and left turn traffic from Carnelian Street. The study looked at the one hour period of time 1n the morning and afternoon when students are present. ANALYSIS The first analysis, which considered only uncontrolled traffic turning from Carnelian Street, indicated the number of vehicles, was about 1/3 the number necessary to constitute a conflict and Justify a crossing guard. This held true for both morning and afternoon. 2. The second analysis considered vehicles on La Vine Street which had to stop as well as those turning onto La Vine Stnet from Carnelian. In this case the number of vehicles was about 2/3 the number necessary to Justify a crossing guard. CONCLUSION As noted above, adult crossing guards are not nornwlly assigned at locations controlled by a stop sign, however at an intersection such as this where potential for conflict with vehicles turning off of PUBLIC SAFETY COMIISSION STAFF REPORT AOUlT CROSSl NC GUARD FOR LA VINE jTRiiS AT CARNELIAN STREET APRIL 2, 1991 PAGE 2 ' Carnelian Street must be considered, the Intersection was studied. The results indicated the vehicle volumes are low at the times students are present, thus the potential for a tonfllct 15 law, Th15 being the situation, the assignment of an adult crossing guard at this location fs not Justified at this t1me. Respectfully submitted, ~n ~C/.//,l~' //n~//~/1 4 / PAR:OMP:Iy Attachment .~ r J X I,I ~ I I ~ \' I ~ I ~.-~I ? ICI i ~ J ~.~ I I -~-o~ ~ ~ xF'~9e• ~ ~~ 4-L1~~ I1 JI /,~-I[ ~~~J'~I.I!1J+i !IfI('1{`. _A VI~J STREET...OI-u I I~~,., _. ~~ )t~~`-J ~~I.SJ fS ~ ~I ~ Ilk ~ ~" ~ ' I ~o .~~- - -~_--- -- I 1 ~ I - -- x u99} ~E4t%11NCY Sl'D S16 ' -' ~ ( Ei15ry NG GRCSSWALK LA VINE ST i I II L~''' r' {r,1 ~. 'It r'~I~r,~I'~"..G°~~~14~ 11II ' ' ' la4 \\\ 111 I Id~O ..} s._.. F acyo-- _A Gr2artDE f ~Re>s'wAl1G {{/ ,~ 1 IIJJ I i ~ _I i1 ! , I I ,I, II , ~ CARNEL4A~.1 p~ ;~ I~~I x Plen ~~~ l l ~ ~ v cl:cr,,tr ~'~ TREET --r--r>- ~~ ~. II II (II 1 , ~ I N" _ II II II Ilt~ I! 6}'S1G fA~1'l~- -~l~ }"StnW KN. I~ 11 xlrJ h" it r / }.i F:a it 1~6Qi ~ \4//~\ •:: a 'I• EXIST'6 W-63 I ~r nuDPOSr --- I fIf L -1.111 Jl°' ~ I I`~~Ir~1 W \~~ o III', 1~ II ~ ~ `1 11 ~._- , Z II' /~ f~/I 4 11 \ ~ '~,,~, z I{ 1I~ ~ ~ i..r ~ % I~ }6 } F ADULT CROSSING GUARD MEED EVALUATION _an~ CARr.lEl-1AN T~_ ~ V 1~~.. ~y~j GAp_1.)ELl d.hf EI.-E MF/-l Tn 2-/ Start/Dismissal Times ~:IS AI r ]l stance from crosswalk to school IU 0~ ± ~~Df stance to nearest signal or stop sign ~ PROPO>a:V r-W 6~1L Width of street at crosswalk ~i (e~ Date of pedestrian counts °1' ~- 1. School crossing at uncontrolled local ion. HOUR NO. OF CHILDREN CROSSINGfMIN~20) VEHICLE VOLUME CRITICAL VOLUME 7:~~15- %:•15 OJ ~ 1 3 O ~ PJ 2:IS-Iris ~ 1 ~l2 30 0 Crossing guard Just !fled for 2 hours? yes_~no~ 2. School erossf ng at traffic signal location. HOUR ~ N0. OF CHILDREN C ROSSINGfM1N=40) TURNING MOVEMENTS THROUGH CROSSWRLFf CRITICAL VOLUME 300 300 3llll Crossinp~puard Justified far 2 hours? yes_~no~ 3. School crossing controlled by stop signs. HOUR NO. OF CHILDREN CROSSINGiMIN=401 VEHICLE VOLUME ON 4-LANE STREET CRITICAL VOLUME 500 500 546 Crossing guard justified for 2 ho~.ir s? yes _~no_ ~3 cALC. ev ~.o~e.~...~vc~ DATE ~• 25 ~ 90 ~' ADULT CROSSING GUARD NEED EVALUATIQN L•_.caticn_, .^~RiJEL.'At.! ~. ' ^ 'E =cheol GApa,l E1 fsaN ,. 5t ar•t /Dismissa Distance from crosswalk to school ISjO~+ Distance to nearest signal or stop sign !''~ ~~''•9 ':~U .(-i.J "r.~L Width of street at crosswalk '~/o~ Date of pedestrian counts °)' 7-`J 9/7 1. Rrl. ran/ _. ___?-~~ -„ ,,, ~.,n Cruiie^ lOCAtIOn. HOUR N0. OF CHILDREN CROSSINSiMlN-20) VEHICLE VOLUME CRITICRL VOLUME ris-I:rs p 97 '~ X00 Cr•ossing guard Justified for 2 hours? yes;,,no~C 2. School crossing at traffic sigr:al location. HOUR. ~ N0. tlF CHILOREN CROSSINGfMIN=40) TURNING MOVEMENTS THROUGH CROSSWALK CRITICRL VOLUME u'v D 3110 000 Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? yes ~, no_, 3. School crossing controlled by stop signs. HOUR NO. DF CHILCREN CROSSING(MIN=40) VEHICLE VOLUME ON 4-LRNE STREET CRITICRL VOLUME 500 SfJO 500 Crossing guard justified /for 2 ho~.rrs7 yes _,rio_ ~Irl CfaL C. PY car Ni~~ RT ~i SI9 t.T 13 f.(L`1 DRTc 1 ~ ~ ~,~ CITY OF RANCHOLC+UCADMOTNGA ril~'t~.a'' ~' Rli,~~a~ A DATE: April 17, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AOTHORISE APPROPRLIITIONB PROM ACCOOM7~ al-~IR1-•+~s~ Raaomta~adstioa Zt is recommended that the City Council authorize appropriations in the amount of $1,500 fxoID Account 01-4451-3455. 8ackarouad When the false alarm ordinance was adopted by the City Council, it was intended that the service charges collected Eor false alarms be used to purchase the necessary materials to keop the program operational. This request would appropriate approximately $1,500 to cover the printing coats for the various forms used to implement the false alarm ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ,,_ .. Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAB/tlr DA8:367 d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~TAPF itEFORT ~i' DATE: April 17, 1991 ~' T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SU&1ECT: Approval of the Envirorpeental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed 7th Street Storm Drain and ATSF Spur i Crossing Improvements between Naven Avenue and Center ~.~~~"~, unu iaouance yr a bawgortcal txemption therefor. RECOMIEMDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the proposed 7th Street Storm Drain and ATSF Spur Crossing Improvements, and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Nottce of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. DACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This report presents an Environmental Assessment initial Study for the proposed 7th Street Storm Drain and ATSF Spur Crossing Inprovements between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue. In Conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to permit construction of the above-mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the construction of a 18" to 36" reinforced concrete pipe in the above mentioned limits. Likewise, the ATSF railroad spur crossing on 7th Street west of Haven Avenue will be improved and opened to vehicular t~~•affic. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt. Respectfully submitted, ;~ s.. ~ r NJO:JAD:Iy Attachments a5 RESOLUTION N0. ~r' O 9~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED 7TH STREET STORM GRAIN AND ATSF SPUR CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS BETNEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HAVEN AYENUE, A PART OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available Input concerning the orooosed 7th Street Stnrm nrafn ana spur Crossing Improvements; and NHEREAS, said improvements require an Environmental Assessment; and NNEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the Envi ronmen a ssessment Initial Study and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption for the proposed 7th Street Stonn Drain and ATSF Spur Crossing Improvements. SECTION 2: The City Llerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant o e a ifornia Environmental Quality Act. PASSED, APPROYEO, and ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 1991 AYES: NOTES: ABSENT: enn s ou or ATTEST: e ra ams, y er ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AFPLIC;ATIOIV` INITIAL STUDY - PAR'P I GENERAL For all protects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and sudnitted to the Development Review Commiittee through the department where the protect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Conmaission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 12) The protect will have a significant environmental Impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed protect. Date Filed: April 17, 1991 Protect Title: 7th Street Storm Drain and ATSF Spur Crossing Improvements Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 - 714-989-1862 Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Protect: Mike Olivier - Senior Engineer, City of Rancho Cucamonga - 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 - 714-989-1862 Location of Protect: Between 6th and 7th Streets west of Haven Avenue and _east of Center Assessor's Parcel No.: Existing Public RON and APN 209-262-16/15 List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway, 1 PRDJECT DESCRIPTioN Proposed use or proposed project: Construct a portion of a Master Planned Assessment Gistrict Storm Drain, Street Improvements, Improve and reopen an existing Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Spur Crossing, and other related Street Improvements Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed building, if any: Approximately 0.3 acres Describe the environmental setting of the project site inciudin9 information on topography, s~ obi 5•-a6ilTty; Tants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, and land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The Project setting is between various comaercial buildings running basically parallel with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Spur Track. The existing structures are fully developed and the project area is used primarily by the railroad for loading and unloading of railroad cars. The area is relatively flat and has very little landscaping, with the exception to the actual frontage of the buildings as they face 6th or 7th Streets. _ With the existing conditions as they are, minor ponding occurs in isolated areas, causing some local flooding problems. There are no existing historical or scenic aspects in or around the project area. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? This is a small section of a Master Planned Storm Drain System. By adding to the system, the 7th Street Storm Drain Section will not have a significant Environmental Impact. MILL THIS PRQJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X ~~ YES NO 2. %redte a SUbatafltiai 2ha~ge iii existi^y TiGiie vP prGdUCc vibration or glare? X 3. Create a substantial change in deaand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. 11 _ X 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? _ X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamaabies or explosives) _ X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): The change in existing noise or vibration will be from the Construction equipment to be used. Conditions will return to preconstruct/on levels once the storm drain system is completed Including street work. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project wilt generate daily: N/A 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: 5-lOt trips 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, in cubit yards: 5001 cubic yards 10. If the project involves the construction of rest dent? al units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for th15 initial evaluation to the best of ~ ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of nO' knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date: ~ l L 'R ` Signature Title: Mike Olivier - Sr Civil Engineer a9 3 CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: April 17, 1991 APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga FILING DATE: LOG NUMBER: 800-88-OB PROJECT: 7th Street Stores Drain and Street Improvements PROJECT LOCATIOk: Between 6th and 7th Streets, N/o Haven and E/o Center Ave. I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of ail "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Hill the propasal have ~ gni~fican resu is in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relatianshi ps7 _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soi1T X c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditionsT _ _ X f. Changes in erosion siltation, or depositionT X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or X use of any mineral resourceT 2. Hydrology. Ni11 the proposal have significant re su s n: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? _ X 30 4 YES MAYBE NO 3 4, b. Changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns, or tine rate and amount of surface aater runoffl X _ _ c. Aiterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X _ _ d. Change 1n the amount of surface water in arty bod,Y of water? _ , X e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? _ _ X f. Alteration of ground water characteristics? X 4• Change 1n the quantity of ground waters, olrnA,. cnrougn aired additions or withdrawals, or through interference with an aquiferl QualitY7 X " Quantity? _ _ 7~ h. The reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ _ X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or selches7 - X Air ualit Nill the proposal have significant resu s n: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sourcesl X stationary sources? ~ b. Deterioration of ambient air quality andJor interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standardsl _ X c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? _ _ X Biota. Flora. Nill the proDOSaI have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including diversl4y, distribution, or number of any species of Dlants? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ____ _ X 3~ 5 YES MAYBE NO [. Tntrode^_ti?n of r.,,.w O^ di Sr" ~~„~ 3 20125 8f ,.p.... p plants into an areal d. Redut ti on in the potential for agricultural i praductionT Fauna. Nill the proposal have significant results in a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of aRy unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ~. l rwu~~i dii i,i uew u,' YI arUP ti YC SpCl1C5 OT animals Into an area, ar result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animalsT _ _ d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitatl 5. Po ulation. Wi11 the proposal have significant res~Es ~: a. Will the proposal alter the locatien, distribution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the hwaan population of an area? _ b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housingT _ 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Nill the proposal have s gn can. resu s n: a. Change in local or regional sotto-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and property valuesT b. Will protect costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? X 1. Land Use and Plannin Considerations. W111 the proposa ave s gn can resu s nT a. p substantial alteration of the present or planned Land use of an area? _ b, A canflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of aRy governmental entitiesT X x x X X x x X X X x 3~- 6 YES MAYBE NB c. An impact upon the quality or quantity of existing consua!pt?vo or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? X 8. Trans ortation. U111 the proposal have significant re su s n: X a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ X - b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? X _ c. Effects on existing parking faci1lties, or demand for new parkingl % d. G~het~~t?~? ibYa,.L upon existing transportation systemSP X e. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X ~ _ f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? X _ _ g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or Dedestrians7 i ___. % 9. Cu ltural Resources. Nill the proposal have s s e~'a~suTEs tn: gn _ _ X a. A dis±urbance to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? % 10. Mealth, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Hill the proposa ave s gn t can resu s n: a. Creation of arty health hazard or potentiai health hazard? _ % b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? __ % d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? _ X e. Increase in existing noise levels? % f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? u _ % 33 ' YES MAYBE NO g. Tile creation of objectionable odors? X h. An increase in light or glare? _ _ X 11. Aesthetics. Mi11 the proposal have significant resu s n: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? ~ _ X c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corn Mrcf ;; 12. Utilities and Public Services. Wi71 the proposal ave a s gn can nee or new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gas? _ _ X c. Communications systems? X d. Hater supply? _ _ X e. Waste water facilities? _ _ X f. Flood control structures? X _ _ g. Solid waste facilities? _ _ % h. Fire protection? % i. Police protection? X j. Schools? X k. Parks or other recreational facilitiest % 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? X m. Other governmental services? % 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Wiil the proposal Fave s gn can resu s n: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _ X 3~ 8 YES MAYBE NO b, Substantial increase in dEDand uu4n e~isti.^.g sources of energyt _ _ X Y c. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? X d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? _ X e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? _ _ X 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the pro.iect have +~ ~~!--t!,;~ N, „~y, oar the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal coaawnity, reduce the number or animal or eliminate important examples of the motor periods of California history or prehtstoryt _ _ X b. Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment Ts one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time long-term impacts will endure well Into the future). X c. Does the protect have impacts which are limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means Lhat the incremental effects of an individual protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, and probable future protects). _ _ X d. Does the protect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ X Ii. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ii.e., of affirmative answers to e a ove ques ons p us a scuss on of proposed mitigation measures). I.1. b. Soli will be removed during trenching operations of the Storm Drain Trench. Soil wilt be recompacted around the installed S torm Drain and the street reinforced as required. Excess soil will be removed by the Contractor. SEE ATTACHMENT FOR PART II CONTINUATION 7 g ATTACHMENT TO PART II - Initial Study ].2.b. The construction of the 7th Street Stona Drain wilt decrease the amount of runoff as surface water. I.2.c. Street runoff will be under-grounded to the new storm drain from 7th Street to 6th Street connecting into the existing Storm Drain in 6th Street. I.6.b. Protect costs are equitably distributed among protect beneficiaries through a per net acreage storm drain fee, charged Y~IYCI YII niiG iaWi111. VIi411Y4 ~i'o iiiayc /11 CP rIW~(.-lr. I.8.6. Construction of the 7th Street Storm Drain wilt reduce, if not eliminate, the present runoff of surface water on 6th Street and 7th Street. Said streets will concurrently be reconstructed and the railroad crossing rehabilitated and reopened to traffic. I.B.e. This protect will have an Interim effect on the present patterns of circulation of vehicles, people and goods for the duration of the construction period. Such circulation pattern impacts can be mitigated by the proper use of roadway warning and detour signing. I.B.f. This protect will include the reopening of an existing Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Spur Track, hence altering the street from a closed dead end street to an open through street. Rail traffic should not increase due to this reopening. I.lO.e. Local noise levels will increase during the construction of the 7th Street Storm Drain. These noise levels can be mitigated by restricting the hours of operation of heavy equipment and the installation of noise attenuatars on said equipment. I.12.a. In reopening the railroad crossing, new safety crossing equipment will be installed, creating a need for an electrical power source run to the new location. I.12.f. The protect consists of catch basins on 6th and 7th Streets, a stone drain between Center Avenue and Naven Avenue, inlets in or adtacent to 6th and 7th Streets, and a tunctlon structure to connect the Storm Drain to the Area YII Storm Drain. The existing structures which discharges runoff onto the street at 6th Street will be modified. I.12.1. Maintenance of the 7th Street Storm Drain will be by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3 Yj 10 III. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed pro,(ect COULD NOT have a significant effect an the environaent, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed Dro,~ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there wail not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the protect, A NEGATIYE DECLARATION HILL BE PREPARED. ! find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. e i iinu ine proposes proaeCi C111 tliUNICALLY EXEMPT per Article 19 ~ Class 3(d) ,Section 15303 and Class 1(b), Section 1530)-of the Cal orn a Envlronnen uatity Act. Date 1-F - 2. -Q ~ ~~1u~Q,.~rp'U ~~S gna ure Mike 011 vier - Senior Civil Engineer - TT e it .37 ?iCT1CE CF EXEMPi1CN ATinC'rgiENT Protect Description: The pro,~ect involves construction of an underground s orm ra n p pe eslgned to alleviate localized storm and nuisance surface flows on 6th and 7th Streets and the signallzation and reopening of an existing railroad spur crossing between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue. Pro,{ect Beneficiaries: The primary beneficiaries of the project w111 be the mme a e co~erc a occupants along 6th and 7th Streets as well as the vehicular traffic along 6th and 7th Streets. 12 38 -- ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG~ STAFF REPORT /~ DATE: Apr11 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Norks Engineer SUBJECT: Consider recoamrendatlon to approve Resolution authorizing the City Engineer to cause the completion of the Sewer and Storm Drain Improvements reoul red by tha fnndt ri nne s npprovar or Subdivision, Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and ~ ENwanda Avenue, a development by the Barmaklan Company ~ RECOMIEIpATIgI: It 1s reconmrended that City Council approve the attached Resolution, authorizing the Ctty Engineer to cause the replacement and/or repair of storm drain and sewer pipelines and the densiflcatlon and compaction of the storm drain and sewer trench as required to complete the lnstallatlon of said storm drain and sewer 9n accordance with the approved plans and specifications as required by the Conditions of Approval of Subdivision, Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394. Said subdivision is located at the nortMvest corner of Base Line Road and Etlwanda Avenue and is a development of the Barmakian Company. Said storm drain and sewer pipelines are located within the Base Line Road right-of-way north of and parallel to the center line of Base Line Road and extending from west of Etlwanda Avenue to Victoria Park Lane. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Du rsuant to the Conditions of Approval for Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394, The Barnwklan Company entered into an Improvement Agreement with the City on February 8, 1940, for various improvements Including a storm drain and structures. On October 25, 1990, a permit was issued for the installation of the approved storm drain and a sewer trench. The permit expired December 31, 1990 and has not been reinstated. The Improvement Agreement was to expire February 8, 1991, and was extended to May 9, 1991 on January 2, 1991. The City awarded the 8a se Line Phase I d II Improvement Pro,{ect from Victoria Park Lane to I-15 on February 21, 1990 to Gentry Brothers, a general engineering contractor, and construction began on July 2, 199q. CITY COUNCIL b CITY MANAGER STAFF REPORT SEWER 6 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS SUBDIVYSION, TR 13886 AND PM 1!394 APRIL 17, 1991 PFGE "c The developer was allowed to install the storm drain and sewer pipeline and structures within the limits of the City's Capital Project as long as the developer did not impact the City's pro,~ect and the developer paid any cost incurred by the ci+,y's contractor resulting from work being performed by the developer. Satd storm drain has been Installed by the Developer but does not meet City standards and specifications. Said sewer has been installed by the Developer, but does not meet Cucamonga County Water Districts standards and specifications. The stone drain may be reeatwd. h~~t wn .b..,d.-e extensive work. Cucamonga County Mater District has advised the City Lhat the sewer will have to be removed and reinstalled. Despite many conversations with and notices to the Developer and his contractor, no corrective work has commenced. On March 27, 1991 the Developer and his contractor were, by certified mail, notified that they are 1n violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cods and were given five days to correct the violation pursuant to said code. No corrective work has commenced at this time. The City's contractor has submitted a claim to the City in the amount of 526,037.00 for delays caused by "The Barmakian Company's Utility Installations". A second letter has been sent, by certified mall, to the developer, his contractor and his bonding company advising them of this recommendation to City Council. Respectfully subm ted, L-C'~- ~ NJO:MP:Iy Attachment ~O RESOLUTION N0. 9I~ O ~^' A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO CAUSE THE COMPLETION OF THE STDRM DRAIN ANO SEWER DIPELINES LOCATED NORTH OF ANO PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETNEEN VICTORIA PARK LANE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE WITNESSETH THAT, WHEREAS, The Barmaklan Company, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, desired to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conu,Li;.;c'.?; "nProved subdivision known as Tract 13896 and Parcel Map 11394; WHEREAS, the Developer has entered into an Improvement Agreement witn the Ctty to construct certain required improvements as a condition of said development; WHEREAS, the Developer has been permitted to construct certain public improvements including but not limited to storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures in Base line Road between Victoria Park lane and Etiwanda Avenue, an existing street. WHEREAS, the Developer has failed to complete said storm drain and sewer pipelines and is in violation of the Rancho fucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 12.03 and Section 10 of said Improvement Agreement. WHEREAS, the completion of the storm drain and sewer pipeH nes and structures are a prerequisite and essential to the completion of the north road bed of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue and hence the completion of the traffic signal installations at the intersections of Base Line Road at Victoria Park Lane and Base line Road at Etiwanda Avenue. WHEREAS, the City Council, prior to the approval said Tract and Parcel Maps, had determined that the widening and improvement of Base Line Road from Victoria Park Lane to I-15 including the traffic signal installations at Victoria Pnrk Lane and Etiwanda Avenue is necessary for the protection and promotion of the public health, safety, morale, comfort, convenience and welfare pursuant to said Code and entered into a contractual agreement with Gentry Brothers, Inc., a general engineering contractor, to cause said widening and improvement of Base Line Road. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ODES HEREBY RE50LYE AS FOLLOWS: The Developer is hereby found to be in violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 12.03, Public Improvement Construction Permits, more particularly Section 12.03.070, Permits - - Commencement and Completion of Work, which states "Every permittee shall complete the work within the time required by the permit". ~1 RESOLUTION N0. STORM GRAIN 8 SEWER PIPELINE APRIL 17, 1991 PAGE 2 2. The developer 1s hereby found in default of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Improvement Agreement for Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394, City Council Resolution 90-055, dated February 2, 1990, and Extension, City Council Resolution 91-004, dated January 2, 1991, more particularly Section 10 which states "Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unlustlfied delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and/or his contraetor by any lawful means." 3. It is hereby determined that the completion of the widening and improvement of Base Line Road, an existing street, from Victoria Park Lane to i-15 including traffic signal tnstailations at Ylctorla Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue is essential to the safety and welfare of the public and that the completion and acceptance of the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures not completed by the Developer is a prerequisite to the completion of the widening and improvement of Base Line Road. 4. It is hereby determined that the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures not completed by the developer are within the limits and scope of work defined by the contractual agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Gentry Brothers Inc., a general engineering contractor. 5. It is hereby determined that Gentry Brothers Inc., is qualified, best suited and available to complete the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures under the terms of said contractual dlrectedtby thehCltyoEngineer througheatCOntract ChangesOrder pursuant to the terms of the contractual agreement. ~. The City shall by any lawful means, pursuant to Bald Improvement Agreement and said Municipal Code, recover from the Developer and/or his contractor all cast and expense including but not limited to delay cost Incurred by and claims received from Gentry Brothers Inc., resulting from the Developers failure to canplete the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structure work in a timely manner. Pursuant to the Municipal Code, permits shall not be reinstated or issued until all charges Incurred by the City have been paid. ~~ ~~ ~~ G ~,~ UT '~°r°' m ~G c° +.~ ti~~ Q°iw pW QC ~ Qrooo~ ~ ,pro a z,C o'h ~J ,(~ w4°'GZ ~rz witi '' troy y'`4 0 ~'~~°?° A D o: ~ e4Q4 A c ro¢ cro roC ° c°'D '~ c 4i° vc 'e°' ~~CA°roc,Cm ". ~ Ca roro tiC y° yQ^o 0 JC'o~ of •.~ wj m hro R° l~ n' "C°' C tih ~ i° ..° c°j ~v"+,°ci ~" k^i R44 v~ G'' oc '~ Oro^Q'o~ ~''4 w°' wr 2 G +wj c°' <" ~° roy wro ~ troy ti ~ r°' a, o oCa G'Ji%, i° ° P~` o° ~rrz ~,~ CD ,tip ~a m cD ~j oo04?°Q9 ~ro roc 1roC 0.i ~~oDD°CC 4°CC~' aFo%~ ~ro ^'r'rom 'y°' a ` y° wro ro' ~' oroo' JC C° i 3ro C c° tiCA3 %~roywa V Croy ,~ y3*~ ~ ~C ~ JC4 ~~ • ~Py ~ CC `yy~ ~4\P4°OOO ~O~ ~yp~ Q,° t~ ~~~ D~ 4°~roypU~~ `*L'E 04 °~Q `F ~4 D C C'° oroo hVCro ~~roQ .yroyC ~ a°D`+y, V1 ~ro~ ~v%p°i ro ra ~~ro-~°C•t~ °4ro4C~t'2 D~O~° ~i tirro P `y~ '~ w C°.4 O°r JC 4~ JC y *~" 4 c 4 r '° o y D DV'tirtr y"~ }G 5 ~ i. O O ° O i 4 °\ 4 4 y 4 C 0 P ro ,pC ~~ b ° roi c°' a°' '~c'~v~ -1 ro Oro PyyoCroo°a `rr w°c D re'0,zy roCD ~y 4 3 QL *C ,4 °C V m ~. '+`.I,.~' D p JQ. D~4*y 'oCroy ~ 4 y •~ yy Q~C°jD'D mF Cvo4 Cy C' Q, o mC C °*C 3 DD y ~Q ~C ro m ,~¢ h4,' JQ J4 c ~p° r°' yro 4°' y , ~ ti-1 c°' ~ D ° ~C '' roi ° y°F y OP ` 4°'`4~*~ ~~. Dro ~.ro Q `„ C°,ym p~ roC Qy ,~c C0 ,pc Q ~2 ,~j h0 ~p.F. `~. V Cro ~ Cro JQ Qy roCrro D2~°Cy rC 4 C°j Q'~ +y ~n' CN 4 4, 0 0D 5J mD z`' w Dro ~°° C~ ra CQ .°3'~ro yroc.'~' 3° y ~' D 4 C C ro ,p roC 0y .°ro ~ .~ Cro,T '~ '" oC ~~ 4C° 4° h~y ro=b ~ Cro Y 'C y° y Cyrro~~0 <'r 4y 4 ~ `~J ~N 4roy v ~ 4ro yro~°4 y,~ a~J. y ~ ti 4 4° C. 'O i c°'rom°`v \P? v+~.•JQD{roe~.~zPyyjroD`~j~~e ~•r~D~m ~yy`1 ~' y4 '^e+.C yy ?o rro o v ~ D r'O,4 z eD y' D c .°°' .! /~~~ R' P OJ x, •, ~ ° ,pC 4 r D ro ° rCl~,l~ ti tiroroCD VU' q00 0C D OC ,py~° 4 ~ °C Cro *C C ~ V+. 0P c F~ ro°o~,Qy~~ 4°'0„ a°' ,~~``4°'~ro cmy~rm ~J M ,, o,mC .tir.^pr aD D w ~/ ~ POro 0. ~j °hC F° y Q b m NC u° R i °V'` D A ro sCw C°D j / mC°{ mC~~ v ca4 m^~°4ro °`' y eQro c rasa 4`. ;~, ?CjCZq*%C ~' 4 ?Q'y~ D / may. _, - ., _i ~~,..... ' .. ...,.' ' ..,..b CORRECTION h,T l/ n,\ R STAFF REPORT DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walt Stfckney, Associate Engineer . ,..: , SUBJECT: Approval to terminate a Professional Service Agreement for Engineering planning and design services relating to the updating of the City's Master Plan of Drainage for the !'_,~,.nnne, Over and Day Creeks area. The project's contract amount of f2btl,suJ waa ta~~JeG fw: •.!v rrneral City Drainage fund (Account No. 23-4637-8766) with partial rclmbursement of 575,000 from RDA (Account No. 11-50300). AECOMENDIITION: It is recommended that the Ctdr Council authorize Lhe City Engineer to terminate a Professional Service Agreement between the Ctty and Psomas and Associates for the update of the City's Master Plan of Drainage. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1988 the City awarded Psomas and Associates a Professional Service Agreement to update the Master Plan of Drainage covering the Cucauaonga, Deer and Day Creeks area of the Ctty. Upon their review and development of portions of the Master Plan, none of which have been adopted by the City, Psomas and Associates had determined that work had been perforn~ed, and other work has yet to be performed which 1s beyond the scope of the original contract and thus requires an addition Lo the contract. After many months of the City's review of Psomas and Associate's claim, both parties have conceded that they are at an impasse and can not resolve the remaining differences. Therefore, Engineering has determined that the Contract be terminated and the Master Pi an be completed by City staff. Any balance remaining on the contract with Psomas and Associates will be negotiated and resolved between the two parties. It 1s expected that the final cost to the City will be considerably less than the original contract. Respectfully submit` CJ ` (~~ NJO:WS:dlw ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT v -~,~ DATE: Apr11 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager ~ FROM: Wm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ADDroval of Reimbursement Agreement for Installation of a portion developme teofPTractd13367relacated 1olAaxthystiAvenue atiHTgh and Avenue, submitted by Homecoming Partners Limited - DRA-15 RECq~E1pATI0M: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for installation of a Dortion of a Master Planned City Clerknto sign satdtagvreement andito causevsame~tonrecordhorize the Mayor and BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a Condition of Approval of Tract 13367, Homecoming Partners Limited, the Facilities located 1n NnetllrstnAVenue atpH ghTand AvenuMeaster Planned Storm Drain The above required storm drain facilities have been completed by the developer and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The developer has submitted an itemized statement to the City to be reimbursed for construction costs of sa.1d Master Planned Storm Drain Facilities. The developer has previously received credit of the drainage fees assessed at the time of issuance of the building permits. Staff has reviewed the statement for the construction costs submitted by the drainagerfeee the City willdretanburse to the developer,mthe sum~of S150f40 .23e per the terms specified in the Reimbursement Agreement. Respectfully submtrtted, ~~~ Attachments: Exhibit "A" Resolution - , ~ -~ _ - ~•1 T Y Z ~ ~. _ __ i __ .. Y < C ~ ,. I s __ ~~II~,`;~ _ ~ _ e _ ...~.. ~ )7~'. - '',- mss= ~., - ~=~ _ r L h'T ll < Q t l>N ' ~ ~T~ ~~J ` z `~~'' o5 "=tea ` 'v :, x~.., Plii i . ro ~ "::^: ~, c I `~~ '11 ~~ _ ,ta., ~„ .. e I ~., a,..cwu. "~ aJV~i rac ~n ^v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION i'e ie •: o ~.t Ly„}' c;~5, ,;e,~ ~'~~~ '~ksa `.~ i ~ i I. `I i e.vs-e,.s ..ar ~z ~ ~ ~I~~I '~ f ~ ~,K r+at tisv<. i ' ~ i ~I~' ,r. vii<~>is PPEM: pan - is ~'j,F'~ TRACP 13367 EXIiIBTT: "~° V //7~ RESOLUTION N0. `7 ~U~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAigNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR041NG RE[MBURSEMENT AGREEMENT E%ECUTED ON IMRCN 11, 1991 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITIES LOCATED IN AMETHYST AVENUE AT HIGHLAND AYENUE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by Homecoming Partners Limited, as developer of Tract 13367 for the installation of a portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facilities located in Ametftyst Avenue at Highland Avenue - DRA-16; and NHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed Bald storm drain lnstallatlon; and NHEREAS, the developer at Lhe time of Issuance of the bull ding permits, has received fee credit tram the drainage fees for the amount as stipulated 1n sold Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that sold Reimbursement Agreement be and the same 1s hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF PET~(D~~' GATE: Apr11 11, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Nilitam J. O'Ne11, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering At de SUBJECT: Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Undergrounding of a Portion of the Overhead Ut111ty lines, located along Deryl Street at Traveler Drive in connection M th development of 1raCi 1JV4L, SUV1111 LGCV Uy 111E uCV CI UpNC114 bV1'pV1"O LI U11 - UR-011 RECONENDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of a portion of the overhead utility tines on Beryi Street at Traveler Drive, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same W record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of Tract 13642, H1x Development Corporation, the developer, was required to underground the overhead ut111ty 11nes on its protect side of Beryl Street. Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, and the conditions of approval of said development, the developer has requested to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement M th the City to be reimbursed for a portion of the undergrounding costs from the adiacent properties directly benefiting from the undergrounding of Overhead Utilities on Beryl Street at Traveler Drive. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 202-741-64, and 202-751-36 are currently developed as single resldenttal homes in the Residential Development District. Therefore, contrlbutlons toward the sub,iect undergrounding does not appear likely 1n the very near future, however, may be possible at the time of City's conditioning of future subdivision or redevelopment of said parcels. Assessor's Parcel No. 202-041-22 1s currently undeveloped. Therefore, contrlbutlons toward the subiect undergrounding is Dossible at the time of City's Conditioning of future development of said parcels. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPOAT UR-011 - HIX DEVELOPMENT CORD APRIL 17, 1991 PAGE 2 The Engineering staff has reviewed the total costs of the under~roundtng, and the distrl6utton of the costs as illustrated 1n "Exhibit D" of the sub,iett Reimbursement Agreement. The City has provided a minimum of 10 days notice prior to the date of the Council's meeting to those parcels affecte6 by this agreement. Respectfully su¢mt\tted, ~~~ ~ ~ (~ NJO:SM:dlw V Attachments: Exhibit "A" Resol ut1 on TQ m r~ m .~ TRAVELER DRIVE :a,.~:~~ :emn~~ I rvmw~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA l.NGINEEitIiIG DIVI:IQN n -1 ~EC~END ® ~ENEFIr `'iA'rZCELS V/q'\\1 j'pEM; TRACT 13642 : GR-011 1 V 'j'j'j'j,Li'; TRACT 13692: (,R-011 Ti' i{~~I1': MIG^Jw~ETTE STREET R'eSDLUTION HO. t~ j ' `~ 7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTED ON W1RCH 18, 1991 FOR THE UNDERGRDUNDING OF A PORTION OF THE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES LOCATED ALONG BERYL STREET AT TRAVELER DRIVE WHEREAS, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Reimbursement Agreement submitted by N1x Development Corporation, as developer of Tract 13642 for the undergrounding of a portion of the overhead ut111ties on Beryl Street at Traveler Dr1ve (UR-0111; and WHEREAS, the developer, at the developer's expense, has completed said undergrounding operation; and WHEREAS, the owners of the adloining properties will share in the expense of the undergrounding operation costs as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the MAyor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Reimbursement Agreement on behalf of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said Agreement to record. 50 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~'~ DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager 1 FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve N. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13440, located on the north east corner of Kenyon Nay and Lark Drive, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the su6~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13440 were approved by the City Council on Aril 6, 1989, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: E379,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5189,000.00 The deveioper, J.P. Rhoades, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreemen'_, due to the slowdown of the economy. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted,~~ %/ (' 4 NJO:SMGay J" Attachments J. P RHOADES DEVELOPMEN"I' I801•C PatkcWrt Place Santa Ana CA 92701.5080 P.O. Box 1973. SenW Ana CA 92702.1973 (714) 9729944 FAX (714) 973.08&5 F{enne'h'I'. France Project .14anaQer/Consuhant Fiarch 26, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA P.O. Hox 801 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Steve 3f. Gilliland Engineering Division RE: TRACE 13440 Dear 61r. Gilliland: Due to a weak economy and the resulting weak sales activity, we respectfully request an extension of the improvement Agreement Yor Tract 13440 for 12 months. The tract and improvements are over 85% complete at this time with the bonds in place to complete the work. The remaining improvements of the final lift of asphalt paving, raising the manholes to grade and the last 15% of sidewalks and street trees will be able to be completed within the 12 month extension. I have enclosed 3 notarized copies of the Extension Agreement as well as a check in the amount cf $251.00. We appreciate your consideration in this request. Sincerely, J. P. Rhoades Development i ' Kenneth T. ~6nce Project Manager/Consultant XTF/jat:050 Enclosures S~- RESOLUTION H0. CJ~'Oq~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13440 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 17, 1991, by J.P. Rhoades Development as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the north east corner of Kenyon Nay and lark Or1ve: and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in satA Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, is to De done in conluncti on with the development of said Tract 13440; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~3 --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~, STAFF REPORT '~`~'~" DATE: April 17, 1991 ;x.~ T0; City Council and City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II-~ ~V SUBJECT: gpproval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13898, located on northwest corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue, submitted by Mizrahi 8 Say RECOMMEIOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subfect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements for Tract 13898 were approved by the City Council on April 5, 1990, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: (189,000 Labor and Material Bond: f 94,500 The deveioper, Mizrahi a Say, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement due to the slow economic con dltions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submit&d, ~~ ~~ NJO:SMG:sd Attachments -~ MARCH 21, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CO[R9UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE P. O. BOX 807 oeurun rnrnunure re o~ono ATTENTION: STEVE GILLILAND/ PUBLIC WORES INSPECTOR DEAR STEVE, DUE TO LAST YEARS ECONOMIC CONDITION IN THE HOUSING MARKET, WE WERE FORCED TO POSTPONE THE START DATE OF OUR PROJECT FOR TRACT MAP NO. 13898. AT THIS TIME WE ARE REQUESTING A ONE YEAR EXTENSION TO COMPLETE THE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED WITHIN THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. WE FEEL THAT THIS WOULD BE AMPLE TIME TO COMPLETE ALL OF THE WORK THAT IS REQUIRED OE US. THANK YOU FOk ACCOMMODATING US IN THIS MATTER. BERNIE MIZRAH, I / ~ ~~ 1642 EARLMOHT AVE. LA CANADA, CA 91011 (818) 790-8662 55~ RESOLUTION N0. 9~'~ 9-! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 1MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13898 VMEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on Apr11 17, 1991, by Mizrahl a Say as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adtacent to the real property specifically described thereto, and generally located on the northwest corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,{ect to the terws thereof, 1s to be done in conjunction with the deveiopment of said Tract 13898; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified to said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 5(P --- - CITI' OF RANCHO CI!CAMONGA STAFF REPOT ~~ rr DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Ide. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 011111and, Public Morks Inspector [~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 87-34, located on the Nest side of Archibald Avenue south of Base I Line Roed, submitted by ARCM, Ltd. I RECOMMEIDATiON It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSlS/BACKGROUND improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for OR 87-34 Mere approved by the City Council on October 19, 1989, 7n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f36,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: f18,150.00 The developer, ARCM, Ltd., is requesting approval of a 3-month extension on said troprovement agreement in order to complete the sidewalks and the landscape estabiishment period. Copies of the Iroprovement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, C/r~ kJO: SMG: Attachments ARCM, LTD., A California Limited Partnership 265 Eut Gervry A~svuv, Mmmmy hAt GJi(omi~ 91751(818)1&}1:31 FAX (818) 30'!.0998 April 3, 1991 Steve M. Gilliland Communitx Development Department Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Improvement Agreement for DR 87-34 Dear Sir, As the General Partner of ARCM, Ltd., A California Limited partnership, I would like to request an extension of time of Three (3) months to complete the terms as indicated in the subject Improvement Agreement. Due to a framing problem of the project, the construction schedule has been delayed. Subsequently, the scaffolding for the exterior plaster is scheduled to be removed in the middle of May 1991 and sidewalk improvement will then be proceeded. The requested Three (3) months extension includes also the 30 days establishment period required by the City. Enclosed please find the Improvement Agreement Extension, executed in triplicate and a check of $251.00 issued to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please contact me if there is any questions or-further information you need. sincerely yours, J , Camilla 0. Lim General Partner ARCM, Ltd., A California Limited Partnership COL: ch ARMC-STE2.LTR RESOLUTION N0. ~ (' / ~ ~ A RESOLUTICIV OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 87-34 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on Apr71 17, 1991, by ARCH Ltd., as developer, for the improvement of public 'right-of-way adfacent to the real property specifically described thereto, and generally Located on the west side of Archibal4 Avenue south of NHEAEAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subiect Lo the tense thereof, is to be done in conJunctlon wtth the development of said OR87-34; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension Is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~9 DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: - ---- CITY OF RANCHO l'CCAMONGA ~i'AFi~' LtEPORT `~,~~~„ Apr11 11, 1991 ~` City Loundl and City Managerd C Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector I~~ Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 11734 located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway. RECONEIDIITiOM: The required improvements for Tract 11734 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and it 1s reconxended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds in the amounts of f18,240.00 and f600.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perfomwnce Bonds in the amount of (182,400.00 and (6,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 11734 - located on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Nighway DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91766 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (18,240.00 Maintenance Guarantee Cash Bond f 600,00 Faithful Performance Bond (182,400.00 Faithful Performance Cash Band f 6,000.00 Respectfully submitted, WJO:SMG:Iy ;~~~~ Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~~' IoI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC !!4'ROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 11734 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 11734 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 1s required to be filed, certifying 41R wVIF LVIMp ICIC• NOM, THEREFORE, the City Coundl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is fiereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~/ - ------ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA n ~fiAFi' ItEI~uRT My DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer i BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector I ~\~~: SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, 0.elease of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 12671 Traffic Signal, located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road The required street improvements for Tract 12671 Traffic Siggnal have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it Ts recomaended that City Council accept said Improvements, accept the Nalntenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of (10,000.00, authorize the City Engineer to fate a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perfommnce Bond 1n the amount of 5100,000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 12671 Traffic Signal - located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road DEVELOPER; Levis Homes 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, ca 917B6 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 510,000.00 Release: Faithfui Performance Bond (Street) 2100,000.00 Respectfully submitted, ~,~ ~ NJO:sMG:ly ~ Attachment ~' RESOLUTION N0. '/ I' ~~ off' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IhWROYEMENTS FOR TIIACT 12671 TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COlPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12671 Traffic Signal have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and ~~~.~[.~.,~. ;;i,~i~6 4i :.u~Pieeiun i1 ~YNUi RU LO ae Tllea, LerLl Tyl n9 the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Ctty Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. (~3 ---- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE ftEPOftT GATE: Apr11 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: lan. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer _. /1 ,~,_ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Publit Norks Inspector !I SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for DR 87-44 located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive. RECOIlENDATIdI: The required street improvements for DR 87-44 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and 1t 1s recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5148,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 87-44 - located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive DEVELOPER: Haven Center Partners 8311 Utica gvanue p200 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f148,000.00 Respectfully subp~itted, ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ i Lc L-~~ WJO:SMG:Iy , Attachment I ~, RESOLUTION N0. ~%~ J A RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RCCEPTING THE PUBLIC iMPROVE!£NTS FOR OR 87-44 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORK NHEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for DR 87-44 have been completed to the satlsfactlon of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Conipletlon is required to be filed, certifying ~1.u e,,,n~ rrupnl oto. NOM, THEREFgiE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Compietton with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT n, DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 17, 1991 a City Council and City Manager lJ Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Dub11c Norks Inspector SI Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for DR 88-13 located on the north side of Trademark Parkway between Haven Avenue and Winston Avenue The required street improvements for DR 88-13 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and 1t is recommended Lhat City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond 1n the amount of f34,767.00 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 88-13 - located on the north side of Trademark Parkway between Haven Avenue and Nlnston Avenue DEVELOPER: Reiter - Rinker Gateway P.0. Box 7250 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Release: faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5396,767.00 Respectfully submit p MJO:SMG:Iy Attachment / f RESOLUTION N0. 9'' Io~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC 1lPROVEIENTS FOR OR 88-13 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMDLET30N FOR THE MORK WHEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for DR 88-13 have been completed to the satisfattlon of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Nottce of Completion is required to be filed, certifying Li,e ,rvr'i~ ~umyi ei.e. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaapnga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby acttpted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Nottce of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~7 - ----- CITY OF RANCHO C[.`CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 17, 1991 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Mm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer eY: Steve M. Gflliland, Public Norks Inspector II` SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for OR 88-14 located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 8th Street. RECOMI£NDATlgI: The required street improvements for OR 98-14 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recoamended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the C1ty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond to the amount of 518,500.00 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 88-14 - located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street DEVELOPER: Indumar Investments, inc. 4071 E. LaPaima, Suite D Anaheim, CA 92807 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 518,500.00 Respectfully submitted, NJO:sMG:ly Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9r''~o ~ A RESOLUT[ON OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 88-14 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILYNG OF A N07ILE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for OR 88-14 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NFIEREAS, a Notice of Completion 15 required to be filed, certtfvina the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~9 DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: - ---- CITY OF RANCHO l'CCAb10NGA ~Tr'iFF REPORT i' April 17, 1991 City Council and City Manager ~•) Ma. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector II'~~... Acceptance of Inyrovements, Release of Bonds and Notice of i Caepletlon for DR 89-10 located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 6th Street The required street improvements for DR 89-30 have been cappleted in an acceptable manner, and 1t is recommended that City Council accept said tmpravements, authorize the Lity Engineer to file a Notice of Caapletlon and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithfui Perfornwnce Bond in the amount of 5164,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 89-10 - located on the Southeast corner of MTliiken Avenue and fith Street DEVELOPER: Berry Construction 1921 Nest 11th Street Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) =164,000.00 Respectfully submitted, ~i NJO:SMG:Iy Attactznent n RESOLUTION N0. y/' (OGa A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 89-10 ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CW~PLETION Fqt THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 89-10 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying 1A~ w+L n ~w..t non NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the vrork is hereby nccepted and Lhe City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 7/ - -~- CITY OF KANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ;'':' DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and CTty Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer i BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector,FY /-l~c SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion Por Parcel Map 5996, located on Cabrosa Place south of Nilson Avenue RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 5996 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and 1t 1s recommended that Ctty Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notate of Completion and authorize the City Clerk t0 release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of E74,000 and the Letter of Credit to the amount of 59,400. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 5996 - located on Cabrosa Place south of Nilson Avenue DEVELOPER: Randall and Sandra Oavis 5751 Cabrosa Place Rancho Cucangnga, CA 91701 Release: Faithful Performance Bond f74,000 Letter of Credit E 9.400 Respectfully submittgC, \,~~~~~ U WJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9 I- ~`v ~] A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC [HPROYEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 59% AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COIPLET[ON FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements far Darcel Map 5996 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is reQuired to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFgiE, the City Council of the City of Raneho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted end the City Engineer 7s authorized W sign and fife a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 73 - ---- C[TY OF RANCHU CL'CAMONGA ~ fiTAFF REP(DRT ^/ DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and G1ty Manager FROM: YM. Jae O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve N. Gilliland, Public Morks lnspecto~y+~ SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 13825 Iacated on the south side of Finch Avenue between Mernwsa Avenue and Kinlock Avenue i RECOMIEIDATI011: tt 1s recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Lhe Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street Improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Pannon Design 23277 Ventura Boulevard Noodland H111s, CA 91364-1003 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) (1500.00 Respectfully submitted, i ' fir,' WJO:SMGay - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST~'~F'~' K~;YUHT DATE: April 17, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councll FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy C1ty Manager SUBJECT: Accept the Civic Center and Public Safety Facility Improvement Protect, located at 10500 and 10510 Clvlc Center Drive as complete, release bonds and authorize the airy uierk [o nie a ~ iJouce ai C:ompieuwi'. RECOMMENDATION: The City Councll accept the Civic Center and Public Safety Improvement Protect Contract as complete, authorize the City Clerk to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond and accept the 104b Maintenance Bond for one yeaz, and authorize the release of a portion of the remaining retention, excepting for up to $226,000, 35 days after the recordation of sold notice if no claims have been received. BACKGROUND: The construction of the Civic Center and Public Safety facllity began >n November 1987 with Berry Construction being awarded the contract. The subJect protect has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City. The City staff 1s recommending that a portion of the retention, up to $225,000, be withheld from the contractor pending the receipt of Information regarding equipment operation if it is not made avallable within the 35 day claim period. The contractor is in agreement to this retention v<~ithholding. In addition to the retention, the contractor is also providing a maintenance bond. The purpose of this bond is to provide a level of assurance that any work to the building, including equipment, that fails while under warranty is completed. If the contractor does not perform to correct problems associated with the construction then the maintenance bond may be used. Respectfully submitted, C ]~ani~ Deputy City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 9~' ~(' a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CIVIC CENTER AND PUELIC SAFETY FACILITY PROIECf AND AUTHORING THE FII.ING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE W ORK t.. H.. LL lllil~l+AV, WV VVIIdY VVLIVV V\ t/YV\\V Vy\V• ~ L uV Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center and Public Safety Facility Lhave been completed to the satisfaction of the City: and WHEREAS, a notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, [hat the work is hereby accepted and the City Clerk is authorized to sign and file a notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 7~ ------ CITY OFRANCHUCL'CA~IONGA 5'~AFF RE~~RT DATE: Apr11 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, Ctty Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer ~ -~ ~l, . r-~ SUBJECT: Accept the Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Improvement Protect, Contract No. 90-074, as complete, extend the Faithful Performance our,U iur' uue peo, iu _ utia 6t.^..:]^C_ annA rnl n"en the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". RECONEIOATION: It is recommended that the City accept the Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Improvement Project Contract as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the extentlon of the Faithful Performance Bond far one year in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of (3,366.80, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of 567,336.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject protect has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is 567,336.00 which Includes one change order fora deduction of 542,542.00 approved by Council May 16, 1990. The original amount approved by Council was (109,878.00 and the revised amount approved by Council is 567,336.00. Resoectfully sub`mit~ted~)~ r7~C. fTEc~ NJO:LRB:sd cc; Purchasing RESOLUTIONi ii0. ~~~ tir-rod A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEI£NTS FOR BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING CONTRACT N0. 90-074, ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK MIEREAS, the construction of public improvea~ents for Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting, Contract No. 90-074, have been completed to the satisfaction of tlw! City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Natlce of Completion is re4ulred to be filed. certifvina cne wOYK camelete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonggaa hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Nottca of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 78 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner enttTRrT: pARK FEE UPDATE (ITEM F-1 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGSI Last updated in 1987, the land value in the air land use categories, as well as the park development coat par acre era currently proposed for revision. Information regarding the proposed Park Fee Update was provided to Council in a memorandum dated March S, 1991, end the item was introduced to Council at their March 20th meeting. A public hearing on the proposed fee update was set for the April 3, 1991, City Council meeting. Mr. Frank Williams, newly appointed Legislative Advocate for the Building Industry Association (HIAy was present at the April 3rd meeting and requested a continuance of this item in order to provide additional time to review the proposed fee update. Should Council desire to act on this item as proposed, a Resolution has been prepared and is included for action reflecting the proposed park fee increase. Re ectfu ly itted, J Schultz C munity Se ces Director JS/KME/dak Attachment cc: Tarry Smith Jim Hart AESOLUTTON NO. 91- ~f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE TO DEVELOP PARR LAND TN RANCHO CVCAMONGA AND ESTAELZSHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE BY LAND USE DESIGNATION TO ACQVIRE PARE LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, w.c ~i tv Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga, has adopted Chapter iG .'_? oP the Municipal code, relating to regulations for dedication o! lance, ~.a;^_^~nt o! fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions o:; planned communities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 16.32 oP the Municipal Gade establishes a formula requiring as components, "(the) average cost per acre to develop park land as determined by the public agency", and, "(they fair market value of parkland per acre ns represented by the land being subdivided"; THEREFORE, HE ST NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. That the City Council shall 8etermina and set by Resolution the average coat per acre to davelap park land in Rancho Cucamonga and the average coat per acre to acquire parkland in Rancho Cucamonga; and 2. That the City Council shall review and adjust by Resolution, when warranted, the cost to develop and acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga; and 3. The average coat per acre to develop park lan8 in Rancho Cucamonga is hereby established at One Hundred Forty Three Thousand Dollars ($143,000), and it is that figure of One Hundred Forty Three Thousand Dollars ($143,000) per acre that will apply in the application oP Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code; and 4. The average coat per acre to acquire park. land in kancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of implementing Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, is hereby established by Land use designation at: ~~ &asoiution No. 91- Page 2 IAV Low (VL) ~ $100,000 per acre Low Medium (L) ~ 5125,000 per acre Medium (~) ~ $155,000 per acre Medium-High (MH) ~ $275 000 per acre per acre High (H) _ $325,000 per acre and that these figures will apply in application of the aforementioned Municipal Code Chapter. 5. The average cast per acre to develop and acquire pork land as determined by this Resolution shall apply to tentative maps or parcel maps, approved or conditionally approved, on or after April 17, 1991. Tha average coat per acre to develop park lend for tentative nape or parcel maps approved prior to April 17, 1991 shell be es sat forth in Resolution No. 87-489 and previous land value method. Etfactive 7uly 1, 1991 procedures and provision of Resolution 91- supersede procedures and provieiona of Resolution 87-d89 and it shall be the provieiona of Resolution 91- which shall apply to all tentative maps or parcel saps approved or conditionally approved without respect to date of such approval. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 1991. AYES: NOES; ABSENT: Dann s L. Stout, Mayor 81 ---- CITY' OF RANCHU CL'C'AMOtiG.1 STAFF REPORT ~i"'~ ~- OATE: Aprtl 11, 1991 {~ T0: City Council and City Manager " `-y -' FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer j BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Trafftc Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of establishing a Transportation Development Fee replacing the current System Development Fee n[1,iriiiiviri iuw: It is recommended that the City Council consider the attached ordinance and resolution which will modify Chapter 3.28 of the Municipal Code and establish a Transportation Development Fee 1n accordance with recent state law and direct staff regarding the preparation of final documents. BACKGROUND: Currently, the City collects a System Development Fee from all development when bull ding permits are issued. This fee was adopted soon after incorporation and has not been changed in concept or amount. The fee is lg of the building permit valuation. Although this fee is for the mitigation of cumulative traffic Tmpacis of profecis throughout the City, it has no direct relationship to the traffic generation of the projects. State law now requires this relationship to be the basis for such a fee. This 1989 state law, primarily A81600, requires a connection or "nexus" be established between a development and any impact for which a fee Ts assessed. A nexus procedure has been developed based on the City's recently completed traffic model which describes the relationship between a proposed development and its traffic Impact on any part of the City street system. This proposed nexus procedure provides the basis for a comprehensive program of traffic improvements and a related funding and implementation mechanism. The future circulation system in the City of Rancho Cucamonga requires marry new facilities and improvements to existing streets. Some of these will be built by adjacent development while others are categorized as "offsite" and will be funded by a combination of development fees and development mitigation measures. The program to fund these offsite future transportation improvements is based on the nexus concept which equates the costs allocated to new development to the benefits received. The procedure determines a fair share financial obligation for new development in any part of the City thereby assuring equitable and orderly development of the City's circulation system. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 17, 1991 PAGE 2 The attached report details the procedure and describes the methods used to arrive at the determination of the proposed fees. ANALYSIS: The nexus procedure relates new development in various parts of the City to needed transportation Improvements. The results show the connection or "nexus" between each roadway improvement in the geographic areas contributing to the need far benefit derived from Lhat improvement. The transportation improvements included in the nexus program have four components as TOIIOwS: A. Streets and Bridges (49,530,000 B. Railroad Crossings 28,570,000 C. Traffic Signals 18,460,000 D. Emergency Vehicle Preemption 860,000 TOTAL 597,420,000 Components A through C are actually all part of what is referred to as the city backbone system, and the city's backbone concept is described in Table 1. Mhen credits against fees are granted or reimbursements given, as is done under the current fee, such allowances will be made against the backbone improvements only. A detailed descriptlori of the traffic share procedure can be found in the consultant's report which is attached to this staff report. The procedure is a part of the City's traffic model system and provides an 2quttable basis for allocattng improvement costs. There is a commm~ need within the City boundaries which is shared by all users of the City's transportation system. Thus, for complete equity, this report proposes a Transportation Development Fee be established at one rate throughout the City. CONCLUSION: The following summary represents the fees Tn dollars per dwelling unit or dollars per thousand square feet of other development which are the results of the nexus procedure. The summary also shows the amount which each component of the transportation system contributes to the overall fee. The portion of the summary entitled "EDU/Land Use Unit Equivalents" shows the relationship between dwelling units of residential development and square footages of other types of development. In arriving at a dollar amount for a fee, all development 1s related back to dwelling units with single family residential being one dwelling unit. Other CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 17, 1991 PAGE 3 types of development are related to this based on their traffic generation and other factors such the lengths of trips related to each type of development or the number of individual trips which may be related to more than one type of development. In consideration of all the trip making factors, the interrelationship of the five types of development were determined. Thus for example, each thousand square feet of commercial development is considered to be equivalent to 1.5 dwelling units, thus is given a value of 1.5 equivalent dwelling units (EDU). The actual fee to be charged Por each type of development is shown in the suiwary unaer "LHnu Wt RAIq (IU IAL hit)" as "ODLIARS PER LAND USE CATEGORY UNIT" and can be calculated for the Special Cases listed. Under the nexus concept, residential addlttons are exempt, as are pubiic improvements. FEE RATE SUMMARY EtlU RATES BY COST COMPONENT COST COMPONENT Streets and Bridges Railroad Crossings Traffic STgnals EV Preemption TDTAL DOLLARS PER EDU 756 436 282 13 i,aa7 LAND USE RA7E5 (TOTAL FEE) LAND USE CATEGORY Residential (SFD) Residential (MF) Commercial Office/Bus Park Industr!al DOLLARS PER LAND UNIT USE CATEGORY UNIT DU 1,487 DU 892 TSF 2,231 TSF 1,784 TSF 892 CJ 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 17, 1991 PAGE EDU/LAND USE UNIT EQUIVALENTS LAND USE TYPE UNIT EDU FACTOR Residential (SFD) DU 1.0 Residential (MF) DU .6 Commercial TSF 1.5 Office/Business Park 7SF 1.2 Industrial TSF ~ Special Cases: Hotel/Motes Room .8 Day Care Students .25 Hospital Bed .9 Nursing/Congregate Care Bed .2 Theater Seat .15 Service Station Pump 5.0 Car Wash - attended Site 8.3 Self-Storage Unit .02 Golf Course only Acre .65 DU = Dwelling Unit SFD =Single-Family Detached MF = Multi-Family TSF =Thousand Square Feet The attached draft ordinance and resolution reflect the concepts presented in the nexus procedure report. The resolution provides for the actual dollar amounts of the fees and for an annual review to be made to keep the actual costs of the capital improvements updated, as well as to continually check the accuracy of the actual improvement program. This annual review by public hearing is mandated by state law. Respectfully su tted, ~~~~ NJO:PAR:sd Attachments 8s OADIFANCE N0. 445 AN OPDINANCE OF 'R!E CPIY CO[RJCII. OF 4f~ CCTY OF RANCF~ COCAMR4GA, CALIFCId7IA G[tDIF1C7NG CHAPl'ER 3.28 OF ~ RANQi] CUC9ELl1GA N[MCIPAL CODE, 7U 1387VIDE FOR CITSC-WIDE FENS FUR 'IIYf17SRQd`A'I'ION FACIIIFIFS BA.Sm CN '1HE C1TY NIXUS 13tDCE0DRE 'IIlE CITY QXSICII, OF 7SiE CITSC OF RAFk'Ii0 QICAFIY7GA IbF1 HERESY OPDAIN AS FDIdDWBj Code is h~rlry repealed. Anew Chapter 3.28 is harsh/ added to said Code to read, in wonis and figures, as follows: C11Y-WIDE SY91'FM FEES FCH2 1RANSPO[II'A120N DEOE[APMINP sections: 3.28.010 PUrpn6e. 3.28.020 City-wide Trattspmtation Development Fees. 3.28.030 Limited Use oP Fl'~. 3.28.040 Developer ~stnrction of Facilities. 3.28.050 Fee Adj~~=rrw.d'~. Sectirm 3.28.010 ]?utvose. In order to implement the goals aryl objectives of the Circulation Element of the City of RatKi» Cucatrorga's rpwr,t Plan and to mitigate the traffir_ impacts caused bS' new ,3m,otRnwnr aryl rerevelopment in the City, certain thornugltfares and bridges must be i or ~trvcted. ate City Camcil has dararm; rat that a development impact fee is needed in onlrr to fi.name these public iT,n,.~r,r,~p„±a and to pay f~ the devel.opmettt's fair share of the cosi-s of these ?+R++rn~nw*+*~. In establishing the fee described in the following Sections, the City CUtmicil has fazed the fee to be consistent with its General Plan ard, pursuant to Government Cade Sectial 65913.2, Bas astsldered the effects of the fee with renw~ t to the City's twsirg needs as established in the Housirg Element of the Gerpr't Plan. Section 3.28.020 City-wide Tr,tr~omtation Develormerit Fees. the City-wide Tlattsportatiwt Development Fees are hereby established on the ~^°._--- of a Svi.lding permit for development or redevelopment in the City to pay for ootvstnrctim and inQrovemstt of rt,,,..,~ fares aryl bridges. 'She City Ooimtcil shall, in a Cautcil resolution, set forth the specific amount of the fee, describe the benefit and impact area m whidr the development fee is imposed, list the Nexus In~sovemmt 13a¢am and its caQo[wJtts specifying the public irmivrn~..~e td he flnartoeli, describe r2le estlIDatEd cost of three facilities, describe the reasonable rel.atiortsiup between this fee and the various types of new developmeltts and set forth time of payment. As des¢ibed ~~ Orditience No. 445 FOge 2 in the fee resolutim, this develaprertt fee shall be paid by eadl developer priar to issuance of building permits. on an ataual basis, the City aimcil shall review this fee to determine whett>ar the Pee atmtmts are reaeaabiy related to the impacts of developments std tV<iettim' the described public facilities are still needed. Sectim 3.28.03D 7.imited Use of Fees. iris reviaaies raised by payment of the Citywide 7Yarmportatim Oevelopmmit Fees far the timers InQYOVa~it ptogcam shall be placed in separate and special acoamits aoooxdug to each Nmats Impa.-wetaettt 1?mgram art, zealizirg that the railroad creesitige std traffic skyial its are part of std are to Yw ~t ~,e.a ~~ ;~~ ^+~-- r .~o.:.:,..., czapcnB[rc aooamtt, std such revem>PS, almg with airy interest earnings m that aooount, shall be used solely to: (a) PaY far the City's future oaskrvctim of facilities descsilted in the resolution erected pura;ant to Sectim 3.28.020 above, pr to xeimdase the City Por those described or listed facilities mistntcted by the City with fords advanead bf the City from other soux+ces, ar (b) *+~;mh+~ davelq~eYS who have been rEgtiired Or tied Sectim 3.28.040, to install listed facilities m the Nmaue F'r'o~• (c) verso eadt fee levied by this Sectim is ,iera.,~„~, then each of the then-exi.~-tvg City general averk;ead and applicable dspartroenta7, overhead rates shall be added to the fee std collected. Amaxnts collected as overhead rates shall be transferred ftcm the Trareportatim Devalopma~tt Fee Fsid to the City General Fad to de8ray the oust r'easmably 6csne of the oollectim and administratim of the fees inpoeed by this Ctvgrter. Sec-'rim 3.28.040 ~,++~~ Cmstr+~;m of iii res. {dtenever a developer is rorn,;rw, as a mnditim of approval of a developrent permit, to oonatr-int a public facility described in a resolutim adopted pursuant to Sa'Ctim 3.28.020 whidl facility is +ioa~o...i rvrl bt rite City to have supplemental size, length ar capacitf over that deeded f~ the impacts of that developoettt, arxi gdimi such owistntetim is necessary to enaa.~e efficient arx3 timely atnsbitctim of ttie facilities tietwark, a ro;,~,.~.,t agreement with the developer std a credit against the fee, whidi would otherwise m dtaxcle<1 pursuant to ttus ordinaroe m the develgmettt project, .^,hall be offered. 'I}Ie r+nimF.+raamwN- amount shall, 710t include the portico dR facil burdens ¢eated s~oev ar mitigate the need Ear the available far reimr++.-~4ro..;- in any y~ X17 ~ g stmt ~ ~t EYgineer. ~~n ch~dinanoe No. 445 Page 3 A developer of any project solrject to the fee described in Section 3.28.020 may apply to the City dxmcil far a reduction ar adjustment to that fee, ar a waiver oP that fee, based upon the shamus of any reasarebla relationship ar ne:am between the traffic of that development aril either the amount ar the fee d'enl~ ar the type of Pacilities to be firamed. 'lhe appliwtian shall be made in writing aril filed with the City Clerk rot later than (1) ten days prior to the public hearing on the development permit appliwtirn far the project, ar (2) if ro development permit is reyuixed, at the time of the filing oP the regv'st far a building permit. The appliwtim shall state in detail the factual basis far the claim of waiver, reduction, ar adjustment. ~ City Oaar11 shall omeidar the hear held within 60 ` ~ ••• `••`•~jm'iuu oypia~:ui,au, w. a uulwrace ing days afttar the filing of the fee adjustment application, whid~ever is later. '!he dseision of the City Camcil shall 6e fiml. If a z~ucticn, adjustment, on waiver is cp-anted, any d~a[ge in ~e within the project shall invalidate the waiver, adjustment arc rredrition of the fee. SP1(.T1W 2: 7hia ordi~ne was adopted at a rotioed public hearing, at witidi tiros the Camcil also considered the initial Development Inpact FHe Itesolutim, which r+esolvtian and associated studies were available to the general public for a period of at least 10 days priar to the public hearing. Rlris fee shall apply to the issuaz~oe of any 6uildi7g permit, fca:' any residential development issued 6o days following this ordu~atae's passage a`d for all other types of development 30 days following its passage. the oxdinaroe shall be published rnce within 15 days of its adoption in a newspaper of general cirarlatim within the City of Rarrlro pramotga. X~ S2FSOIlA'ION NO. 91-092 A PEiOIlla'ION OF THE CTFY WUNCIL OF THE CTPY OF FANQIO CU('AMDN(',A, CALIFC>j3fIA, E5fABLI3@IG CP15!-WIDE TPANSPOR1711'IQJ DEVECOPMINF FEES Fri ALL DEVECOPMENiS W11f@7 THE CTTY OF i'tANCt10 CUCAt~YJCa4 Wk~RTFAS, the City Council of the City of Rarcia Cucamonga has adopted Orrlinarce No. 445 areatirg aid establishircl the authority for impasirg arc1 diatgirg citywide trarsp~rtation development fees; aid _ .:Ip3i.: .._._ _ ~____.~_._ _., ;_yY v~ u,c uaLli.. impacts of conteoplated future development on existing public facilities in the City, alag with an a~lysis of the need Par new public and improvements required by new develolment was mrducted, arc? said study set forth the relationship between new development, the needed facilities, a'd the estimated vests of those inprovenents. 71re study, entitled "City of Paula Cucamax3a Traffic Analysis Nexus Prooediue Des¢iption~', was prepared by Austin-Foust Associatffi, Inc., arcs is dated March 1991; axl WHII2EAS, this study was available for public inspection arcl review fourteen (14) days priar to this public hearing; and WHERFA.S, the City Council finds as follows: A. The piulx:ae of this fee is to finarae transportation inpxvvaoents to reduce the iapacts of traffic caused by new development; B. the systm fee collected pursuant to this resolution shall 6e use to fi~tre only the public facilities described ar identified in Ddu.bit npn attad~ed hereto; C. After arvsiderirg the study arcs analysis prepared by Austin- Foust Associates, Zro., errtitlsl "City of Panda Cucaaiorxla Traffic Analysis Nexus Prooadure Descriptim", and the te,-timcvny received at this public hearirYl, the miuail approves said, and incorporates suds herein, and further fircls that the oar development in the City will generate additional traffic i.~acts within the City aid will cartribute to the degradation of the City's thorou~farrs; D. llmeze is a need in the City for thoroughfares and bridges whidr have rot been or have been constnated, kart for whidr new develooment has rat mnlxibuted its fair slate towards these facility costs and said facilities have been called for in ar are mrr;istent with the City's Circulation Element of its General Plan; E. The facts arcl evidenrx presented establish that tlrre is a reasonable relationship between the need far the des¢lbed public facilities and the impacts of the types of development described in paragraph 3 below, for which the oorre.~-paw_itg fee is Barged, arcl also there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development for which the fee is , as these reas~aiable relationships of nexus are in more detail described in the study referred to above; and g$ Resolution No. 91-092 Paga 2 F. 1lfe cost estimates set forth in Edubit "A" ate reasOntlble poet estimates for ocr~stnictirg these facilities, and the fats expected to ba generated by new development will mt exceed the total of these costs. NOW, 7f~0RE, the City Nuncil of the City of Patxfio CucamoTga of Random Cucamoiga does hereby resolve that: 1. Oefinitiorvs. (a) "Develolsent projects" shall mean vction of residential iagrov®ents, c~stnection of ammetcial, industrial, office, or other non-residential iaproveoetds, ar the addition of floor space to existing e+!ts• "Developmem projects includes a project inrvolvirg the iamu,vn ... o ;,,..i...,y yecmii. cot cxavsm~ecim ar reoaLStnxtion. (b) "Exempted developmem" shall mean a rmideMial addition and the following types of ~: public sd~ools a7d colleges, public library, ~~~, Parks, CamtY jail, sports telex. (c) "Fi;uivalent dwelling emit (EOf))" ccrn+erts all lard use emits used in calculating the nexus fee obligatims into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per tL[J. ge fee for a detadxad, residential housing unit is equal to the Pee far an EW. (d) ~~~ t P~ [+mpacwnLs." the imprVVappllt program ocnsists of fqs entri City Backbotle, Railroad Ccvssvgs, Traffic Signals, and c~.e.~....;, Vehicle Pre®Ption. the iirlividual Nexus fee is sutrdivided into these cmporants. 2. The Transpartation Development Fee Shall 6e paid LR~n iam+s•mn of any buildvg permit. The City F]gineer shall determine the fee based upon the type of development. Fee Schedule: Fee per IDU $1,487 4. HN/ a Use +'va~ents ai,A,a i 1~ nLCe FinriValellt (Demendent Traff' Fa.-` 1 FSiI Residential -Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 Residential -Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 Cti,a~-cial -per 'IIxx~sald Squaw Feet (TSF) 1.5 Office/Business Park - T8F 1.2 Industrial - TSF 0.6 Special Cases: flotel/MOtel -Per Ro® 0.8 Day Care - per• Student 0.25 89 Resolution No. 91-092 Page 7 Hospital -per Bed 0.9 Ntn:'sit7g/Congregate Care - pex Bed 0.2 72leater/Cif~ma -per Seat 0.15 Service statim -per Pimp 5.0 Cdr Wash -attended 8.3 Self-storage -per Unit 0.02 Golf Ow.II-ae only -per Acre 0.65 5. Use of Fes. The fee shall be solely used to pay (1) fca- the described public facilities to be constructed by the City; (2) for ,~es,N.~~g the City for the dewlopmea~t's fair share of those capital improvemmrta already omstnrted bf the City; or (3) to reimburse other dewlOpena wta haw crostructed public Facilities described .in fldribit "A", wirers those rartltria. were t,a,r.w +~._t ___ _ .:, w.ii.iyace me rmpncts of the other developers' pmject a~ri projects. 6. p~i~ ~ Fags. The 7rat~Ortation UewlOpoetrt Foe is wmprised of four ooaQonarts. The attadied F]d~ibit "A" that shoos the needed tharar,~fare imluvt~metrts a[gattizes these inprc~ts into foie Vstrepts and Bridges, Railroad Crossings, 7Yaffic signals, and Hmergerwy Prea~Qtion. Fbcb fee t shall be deposited into separate City acmmts. The fee s are shorn in the referenced traffic study and attad~ed hereto ae Hdilbit "B". 7. Fee Review. D7 ar about NOVmober 15, 1991, and ead~ fo11OWi11g year, the IIgineering Division shall review the estimated wet of the described capital improaements, the ozrtinied need for those imEaovEments arri the zeawable relatimahip between sx~ Head and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending ar anticipated and far rdridl this fee is . Zhe City F}gineer shall report the firdurgs to the City waicil at a noticed public hearing and xeccmmetd any adjustment to this fee or other actin as may be needed. 8. Jud_cial Action 7l hg ttLe Resolution Any judicial actin prooea9lrg to attar]c, review, set aside, veid ar amtul this reaoluticn shall be brauglrt within 120 days of is adoption. 9D 7daeolutiM No. 91-092 Page 4 SIGNATURE PAGE 9/ ldesolutipn No. 91-092 Page 5 N a m O a W W C 1- VI K r m W ~ R ~ ~ _ _ e 8 8 N f J J J a u C ~ R _ e w c 6 _p Y ~ T ' N ~. ' ~ 3 . tl ~ 3 g a e o F U a `tl n e c 3 a ° b ag a tC° a B ~ E B ~ ~ .d ~' U V U J 4 ' ~ ~ t u ~ f E 0 0 0 O in N N C U p M O H m ~ x _ _ $ R R 5 .°. ° e O ggyg Es. 3 `o < u` 3 -~ ~ v g 8 _ i > j O g 3 g Q -° g S e ggc o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W g o ! s e c 3 ~ g ? '~ ~ ~ b o ~ ~ 2 `Y `c 6 ~ O O C v C 3 ~ ~ S a ~ a a ~ 9 = a e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~. a a E~ E~ ~§ $~ u$ H d h H 9~- ldesolutim No. 91-092 Page 6 2 N 0.' 6 O a J 4 6' 4 w r X W n ., ~ ., ~ ~, s Q - - - - R V E € - d ? 4 X 3 IL _ ~ ~ a a s a a a~~~ s a z~~ ~ _ ~ Q C , ~ e 6 E _ - y ~ 8 8 =, Q Q V ~ 3 3 ~ Q ~ X i2 X % ~ ~ ~• ~ C C 3 C C K C Ca' C C C C vLi '~^• '^'L y N N N N N N N N N N ~ N N Q i0 tl t tl i O N q %n N N L' L 2 < < ~< < < < < 4 t 3 m m S g ~ ~ ~ A e ~ r ' R ° 4 4 _ E a E _ _ _ ~ n_ -. c c ~ F~ ~ T ~ `.} ~ ~ gdE rY ~ LL ~ O ~ ~ c ~ 9 'J LLS ~ ` r f~ N a aa gg e g a ~ 3 e e e e e` ¢ ~ e ~ E fi ~ 3 x .. .. .~ .. .. ~ .. .. ~ N N H ~ % ~ ~ X Y, iZ X X ~ ~ N N 'b C C C 5 C C C C C C C ~ '^ '^ N ~n N N N JI of N N N N } ~ e 93 0 0 ai N N H N O U T O F- EXHIBIT "A" 99. SUMMIT AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD 100. SUMMIT AND EAST 101. HILLSIDE AND ARCHIBAID 102. WILSON ANO ARCHIBALD 103. WILSON AND HERMOSA 104. WILSON AND HAVEN 105, DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WILSON/SUIR41i 106. WILSON/SUMMIT AND ETIWANDA 107, WILSON/SUMMIT AND EAST 108. WARDMAN-BULLOCK AND WILSON/SUP9IIT 109. WILSON/SUMMIT AND CHERRY 110. MILLIKEN AND FAIRMONT WAY 111. HAVEN AND VALENCIA Tie. ntHMDSA ANb LOMITA DRIVE 113. AMETHYST ANO MONTE YlSTA 114. FOURTH AND LUCAS RANCH ROAD 115. FOURTH AND NERMOSA 116. FOURTH AND CENTER AVENUE 11T. FOURTH AND UTICA AVENUE 118. FOURTH AND CLEVELAND AVENUE 119. FOURTH AND VINCENT AVENUE 120. FOURTH. AND MILLIKEN AVENUE 121. FOURTH AND FITTSBURG AVENUE 122. FOURTH AND BUFFALO AVENUE 123. FOURTH AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD 124. FOURTH AND SANTA ANNTA AVENUE 125. FOURTH AND UNNAMED STREET 126. CHURCH/MILLER AND ETIWANDA 127. DAY CREEK BOULEVARD ANO UNNAMED STREET 128. CARNELIAN AND WILSON 129. MILLIKEN AND WILSON 130. EAST AND BASE LINE ROAD 131. SIXTH AND ETIWANDA 132. CHURCH/MILLER AND UNNAMED STREET R~olutian No. 91-092 ~ ~ ESTIMATED = AVERAGE CAST PER TRAFFIC SIGNAL X TOTAL ~ St8,460,000 9~ Resolution No. 91-092 Page 8 EXHIBIT "A" 50. FOOTHILL AND ELM 51. FOOTHILL AND ORCHARD 52. FOOTHILL AND ROCHESTER 53. FOOTHILL ANO DAY CREEK 54. CHURCH AND MILLIKEN 55. ROCHESTER AND POPLAR 56. DAY CREEK AND VICTORIA PARK LANE 57. CHURCH AND HELLMAN 58. CHURCH AND HERMOSA eriu niri nRU IEHIW YI~IA HAHKWAY (WEST) 60. CHURCH AND MILLIKEN 61. CHURCH AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY (EAST) 62. CHURCH AND ROCHESTER 63. CHURCH/MILLER AND VICTORIA LOOP 64, MILLER AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD 65. MILLER AND VICTORIA LOOP 66. CARNELIAN AND VIVERO 61. ARCHIBALD AND PALO ALTO 68. HERM0.SA AND PALO ALTO 69. MILLIKEN AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY 70, DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND UNNRMED STREET 71. BASE LINE ROAD AND CENTER 72. BASE LINE ROAD ACID DAY CREEK BOULEVARD 73. BASE LINE ROAD AND HANLEY 74. BASE LINE ROAD AND SWANSON 75. BASE LINE ROAD AND PECAN 76. CARNELIAN AND LAVINE/AVALON 77. BERYL AND ClELITO 78. HE RMOSA ANO VICTORIR 79. MILLIKEN AND VICTORIA PARK LANE 80. NINETEENTH ANO JASPER 81. NINETEENTH AND VINEYARD 82. NINETEENTH AND BERYL 83. NINETEENTH AND HELLMAN 84. NINETEENTH AND RAMONA 85. NINETEENTH AND HERMOSA 86. VICTORIA PARK LANE AND MILLIKEN 87. VICTORIA PARK LANE AND ROCHESTER 88. VICTORIA PARK LANE AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARU 89. DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND kIGHLAND 90. VICTORIA AND EAST 91. HIGHLAND AND CARNELIAN 92. LEMON AND HERMOSA 93. VINTAGE AND MILLIKEN 94. VINTAGE AND ROCHESTER 45. BANYAN AND CARNELIAN 96. BANYAN AND ARCHIDALD 91. BANYAN AND HAVEN 98. BANYAN ANp MILLIKEN 95 Fe6oluLim No. 91-092 P~ 9 E%HIBIT "A" - THOROUGHFARES AND BRIDGES - TRAFFIC SIGNALS WARRANTED BY THE YEAR 2010 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IOCAilONS 1. ARCHIBALD ANO CRESCENT CENTER 2. HAVEN ANO FIFTH 3. SI%TH AND AMETHYST 4. SI%iH AND LUCAS RANCH ROAD 5. 51%TH AND HERMCSA 6. S[%iH AND CENTER 7. SIXTH ANO UTICA 8. SIXTH AND CLEVELAND 9. SIXTH AND LINCOLN AVENUE In f1YTY 11Yn YILL~~~!~ 11, SIXTH AND PITT58U0.G 12. SIXTH AND BUFFALO 13. SEVENTH AND HELLMAN 14. SEVENTH AND ARCHIBALD 15. SEVENTH AND HERMOSA 16. SEVENTH AND MILLIKEN 11. SIXTH AND ROCHESTER 18. SIXTH AND DAY CREEK/HYSSOP 19. SIXTH AND SANTA ANNTA 20. E[GHTH ANO BAKER 21. EIGHTH AND HELLMAN 22. EIGHTH AND ARCHIBALD 23. EIGHTH ANO HERMOSA 24. EIGHTH AND CENTER 25. EIGHTH AND HAVEN 26. NINTH ANO SIERRA MADRE 27. NINTH ANO BAKER 28. NINTH AND FLOWER/LION STREET 29. NINTH AND HELLMIIN 30, JERSEY AND HERMOSA 31. JERSEY AND CENTER 32. JERSEY AND MILLIKEN 33. ARROW AHD BAKE0. 34. ARROW AND BEAR GULCH PLACE/LEON 35. ARRON AND RAMONA 36. ARROW AfiO AED OAK STREET 37. ARRON AND MAPLE 38. ARRON AND MILLIKEN 39. ARROW AND UNNAMED STREET 40, ARRON AND ROCHESTER 41. ARROW AND UNNAMED STREET 42, ARRON AND DECAN AVENUE 0.3. ARCHIBALD AND PLACER STREET/DEVON 44, HERMOSA AND DEVON 45. MILLIKEN AND UNNAMED STREET 46, ROCHESTER AND UNNAMED STREET 47. FOOTHILL AND BAKER 48. HELLMAN AND SAH BERNAROINO 49. FOOTHILL AND RAMONA ~~ laeeolution Ho. 91-092 Sage 10 `m o 0 0 0 0 o I o o I o o a 0 0 l W o 0 0 0 o I o o ~ I o 0 0 l o e 0 o f ° o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 l o 0 0 o a c~ , l l l w ~ o I ~ n v I n n o vi ~ ri o f vi vi i ~i o - . p v a I m .o a ~ N w a W 1- U M M N I .~ N N I M M M I M N N I N p d W N N N I N I I I W I ~ I I W l I ~ I i z ~ I I I I~ ~ i I I I I E I I I . o I I I W a c D I > .w m I I _ a ~° I I I I I I ° " I I W o .. a v.. Gm pJ I I C I I m m O > y C L d I I I I F ~ N A ¢ I O ~ P I I I L ¢ wm 9 i 9 I I I W J '~ ~~ 1 I I J ] W d 9 d I Q V > i D ~ I d N d d d ] I I > { Q i LL W ¢¢ >> c o ¢ ¢ i I s. > F I- x ~ ¢¢ d m I I ~ a s I t o p p an d I d l a c l u I P ~ " ° v a m m m w a ~ I ~ d I n . . ~ w c i ¢ ua c ' ~ - ~ m " m c c c I ~ I a ~ I . . l s u ~ > ° N w L U l G I ~ P c d d ] I c I G I ~ ¢ Q O m Q U I 6 Q 2 IL i E O i O i w S p I ¢ c I I ~ I I I I I R •~ w .. w .. j N N h i ri ri h ; Q P P i N I W I I I 9~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb10NOA STt~FF REPORT' ~- GATE: April 77, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Couttcii FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner HY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner ALan WdYren, Associate Plaoner SUBJECT: ENVI AONMENTAL ASSBSSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65588 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the City Housing Element has been prepared. The changes to the document include: an update of the Technical Appendix cons istinq of documentation and analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information and housing assistance needs; update find revisions t5 the City's housing objectives and policies; and development of a five year action program designed to impleaent the City's overall housing goal. Zn addition, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commi Saion recouwen ds, by its adoption of Resolution No. 97-29, approval of the draft Housing Element Revision and issuance of a Neyative Declaration. BACKGROUND: Sta to Law requires periodic revisions or. the Housing Element at 5-year intervals which shall incorporate the most recent demographic information and housing trends to accurately assess existing and future housing needs. The original Housing Element was approved with the General Plan in April 1981 and was subsequently revised in July 7984• A second revision to the Housing Element is now required. The revision process began in August 19 H9, when the Plarn ing Commission reviewed and approved a staff recommended work program schedule, scope of work and outline for the update of the General Plan Housing Element. As part of the scope of work analysis, the Planning Commission reviewed the existing element objectives and programs as a basis for suggestions to staff for the revision. Since chat time, staff developed a draft Hcus ing Element Revision which was reviewed by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (BCD). On March 27, 7991, the Planning Commission completed its review and recommended that the City Council adopt the Nousing Element Revision as amended by the Commission. CITY CGUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPR 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC..A April 17, 1991 Pa ae 2 The specifics of the process and revlsiona are detailed in the attached Planning Commission report of FebYUary 27, 1991 (see Exhibit A). Councilmembers should review this report and its attachments as they will farm the basis of staff's presentation. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in an ei 9hth page advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. ACTION: if the City Council concurs wish the recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff. it would be appropriate to approve the Housing Element Revision £or inclua loo in the General Plan by Council'» adoption of the attacheA R<=~~~.+_...;, Reapeeif submi ed. L7N: AW:ap Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Report of February 27. 1991 Exhibit "H" - Planning Commission Aeso lotion No. 91-2H Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Minutes of February 27, 1991 Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Minutes of March 13, 19^91 Exhibit "E" - Pla nniny Commission Minutes (draft) of March 27, 1991 Draft Housing Element Revision (under separate cover) City Council Aeao lotion of Approval i ~~ Brad 8 1 City leaner ~'9 ------ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n STAFF REPORT ~ DATE: February 27, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AS3E5S(+JENT ANn f:F.NCGDT ornv vn+rn ~~•^ - In accordance with Article 10.6, Section 65588 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the City Housing Element has been prepared. The changes to the document include: an update of the Technical Appendix consisting of documentation and analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information and housing assistance needs; update and revisions to the City's housing objectives and policies; and development of a five year action program designed to implement the City's overall housing goal. In addition, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. A$,$TRACT: State Law requires periodic revisions of the Housing Element a[ five-year intervals, which shall incor_oo ra*_F the ^., re tnl iuiormacion on demographic and housing trends to accurately assess existing and future housing needs. Contained within the body of this report is a description of the legislative requirements and organization of the element, a discussion outlining coordination efforts with other City and State Agencies and an analysis of Che significant issues identified as a result of the update. ZI. BACKGROUND' i;~q~=lat_.~,?y~_R~,q ,'r m n = The Legislature of the State of California states that "the early attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California family" is a goal of the highest priority. The purpose of the ~~~ x~+l PLANNING CG~4IZSSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Peh r... , -.. __... .r .. , i99i Page 2 Housing Element is then to "make adequate provisions for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community," including the identification of adequate sites for housing. The required contents of a Housing Element include; An assessment of housing needs and an inventory of resources and constraints to meet those needs. A statement of the community's goals, quantified objectives, and policies relative to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. A program which sets forth a five year action plan to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives. In addition to the required contents of the element listed above, the Legislature sets specific guidelines for the periodic review and evaluation of the element which should include the following: A review of the actual results of the previous elements goals, objectives, policies, and programs. An _..a l-'; s'-s ,,. ,. ••' ignifi'anL d.i if erences between what was projected orsplanned anti what was achieved. Based on the above, a description of how the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the revised element incorporate what has been learned from the results of the analysis of the previous element. P reviny~P1 ; g Co 'o Re On August 23, 1990, staff prepared an informational report to the Planning Commission which included a copy of the anticipated work program and scope of work for the update, as well as an outline of the significant issues and additions to the elerne nt. At that meeting the Planning Commission directed staff to add provisions regarding design standards and quality of life considerations. As a result, Objective Statement 1 and related policy and programs have been added to the element. a/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Feh r~l9ry ~O~ lggl Page 3 III, ANALYSIS A. Oraan~ a + f the Element; The Housing Element contains three chapters which separate the technical data from the housing objectives, policies, and programs. This format was originally chosen so that the importance of the City's progrartis is not lost or diluted with the calculations, graphs, or other technical information. Chanter one contains a brief synopsis of the information presented 1n the Technical Appendix, while Chapter Two contains the required five-year action program. The action program is intended to achieve the City's housing goal and includes objectives, policies, and programs. The objectives are statements of intent describing a specific end which relates to a particular aspect of the overall goal. Policies are specific statements that guide decision making. To implement each objective, programs are provided which set forth specific courses of action and establish quantified targets, the responsible agency for carrying out the action, and the available financing. The Third Chapter contains, in detail, the technical data and calculations. The information provided is based on the best available background data and acts as a framework for the City's identified hovsina needs and subsequent policies and programs, Ob iect' es Pol~.~.s and Programs; The City's Housing Goal has been broken down into nine Objective areas: (11 To Provide Quality, Well- Functioning Environments; (2) Conservation and Rehabilitation of the Existing Housing Stock; (3) Provide Opportunities for a Broad Range of Housing Types; (9) Provide Housing Opportunities for Projected Commercial and Industrial Employee Households; (5) Provide Housing Opportunities for Households of Low a..^,d Moderate Income and Special Needs Groups; (6) Promotion of Fair Housing Practices: (7) Encourage Residential Energy Efficiency; (B) Reduction of Governmental Constraints; (9) Periodically Update and Mon.it or the Housing Element. The objectives and ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 oe.., n . _y~ . corresponding policies and programs are based on present and anticipated resources of the City and should represent the most feasible action the City can take in order to satisfy the identified needs as described in the Technical Appendix. Coordina 'or with ('i„t+ A„ep In preparation of the revised element, staff Chas conducted an extensive Needs Analysis to determine existing and future housing considerations for the community. This Needs Analysis was conducted in conjunction with documentation oreoa red fnz thw ae.+o..e+c~.-c.;t Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy, as it was staff's intention to coordinate the development of these two interrelated documents. while the RDA study will first result in a general conceptual strategy wh i.;h will later be formulated into detailed action elements, the housing element sets forth specific action programs which are to be implemented over a five year period, Ther.fer.. in erder to n~• a ei v he thmam tro decumen a w nroarsm ha he n iddmd to the Bovaipy =l.ment to r. Rn'r. the inoorporat.ion of thm ~m :~: x ~:...+ alamenta of the Affordable Ro •wipQ a_tratea^, once they are devwloped. ~,oordination with State Aa n i As required by State Law, the City must submit a copy of the draft Housing Element for review by the Department o£ Housing and Community Development (HCD). A 96- day review period is required in the case of a housing element amendment, after which time HCD shall provide the City with written findings regarding the adequacy of the element toward meeting requirements of Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Previously, trie canments from HCD were considered to be advisory only. However, as a result of recent legislation (SB 2279), which became effective 1/1/91, City's must either make efforts to substantially comply with HCD's comments, or not make changes and adopt the element with findings stating why the City believes there is substantial compliance with State requirements even though HCD had expressed concerns. In addition, HCD is now required to review the final adopted element, determine whether it is in compliance with State Law, and then report those findings annually to the legislature. 03 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR February 27. 1991 Page 5 A copy of Rancho Cucamonga's draft Housing Element was sent to HCD in October, 1990, and written comments were received back on December 17, 1990. A copy of NCD's comments are attached as Exhibit A. Staff has made a diligent effort to comply with those comments. Resulting modifications to the element made in response to the comments have been indicated as strike-out and bold in the text and a summary of those changes are attached as Exhibit B. Once the element is adopted by City Council, a copy of the final text will be sent to HCD for their review along with a cover letter describing the City's responses [o their comments, ^'lnif icon iss yea; As a result of State requirements and the needs assessment conducted for the Housing Element update, there have been some additions as well as significant issues identified in the revised element. Housing and Population Build-Out Foracaata: Housing and population build-out forecasts have increased significantly from what was previously indicated in the 1989 Housing Element update, In 1984, the forecasts were based upon data provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) in their '82 Modified Housing Projections. Recent estimates of build-out population and housing have been based upon current land use designations, vacant land availability, and State Department of Financs annual housing and population updates. Population and housing estimates in 1989 were, 127,500 and 45,750 respectively, as compared to recent City estimates of 157,073 and 57,016. It is important [o note that these figures may change again once the final 1990 Census results become available. Jobe/HOUainq HslanC• and Captuza Rate: In 1989 SCAG published their Growth Management Plan (GMP) for the Southern California Region in which they attempted to address housing, mobility, and air quality through predicted growth patterns of jobs and housing. The GMP indicates that an improved jobs/hous i;.g balance ir. the region (a shift of new jobs to /~1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVZSION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 Page 6 housing rich areas and of new housing to job rich areas), should, among other things, help reduce further congestion and help improve air quality in the region. SCAG estimates that by the year 2010 the region will have a jobs to housing ratio of 1.22 to 1. However, projections for the City through build-out indicate that Rancho Cucamonga will have a job/housing ratio of 1,80 to 1, which indicates that the City will be job rich. As a result, programs are necessary to ensure that a significant percentage of those who n~L City as well.y~~r ~"` 'ue aole to rive in the Jobs/housing balance is net an entirely new concept and, in fact, had been addressed ir. the previous housing element. However, as a result of the increased concern regarding this issue not only have the programs contained in the previous element been continued, but new programs have been addetl. This issue is addressed in Objective Statement 9 and its related policy and programs. 3. 8ouainq Aasiatanca Needa: Rea' nal H a n d A Stare law requires SCAG to complete a detailed Housing Needs Assessment which identifies the existing housing needs as well as the projected five- year housing needs for a jurisdiction. The int ~.` s Lu ensure that jurisdictions will be able toy accommodate the forecasted growth as well as to be able to accommodate the existing and projected number of lower income households. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment, (ANNA), estimated that Rancho Cucamonga has 3,069 existing very low and low income households currently in need of assistance. In addition, SCAG has predicted that an additional 9,56E households will be needed in the City by 1994, of which 2,375 are estimated to be very low and low income. Eased upon the City's five- year growth projections it is estimated that between 9,169 and 11,916 units will be constructed through 1994 (Table A-15 in Chapter 3). As these projections take into /os PLANNING COFPfZSSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fah rpa.~. 9'I~ 1GG1 Page 7 account reduced development activity anticipated in the next several years, it is likely that the City will be able to meet the total number of housing units indicated by the RHNA. Sgecia N da FnD ,i~~; Other housing assistance needs which have been addressed in the element include special needs populations such as minorities, senior citizens, single heads of households, and the homeless. Of significant concern was the identification of the City~s homeless population. To accomplish this, staff conducted a survey of local law and code enforcement agencies, social service offices, as well as local churches and informed citizenry, It was determined that on an average daily basis there are approximately 25 persons or less in need of shelter. As a result, programs have been added to the housing element to facilitate the development of emergency shelters and transitional housing to accommodate the identified need, (Programs 5.H.1., S.C.1 „ S,C.2., and S.D.1.), IV. F_NVIRONMENTA* ASSESSMENT; Staff haS reviewed the Initial Study Part I, and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found that no significant environmental impacts will occur as _ _es^'_t ^f «.he proposed ~<n anal PLan nJusing Element Revision 90-03A. The proposed revision and amendment of the Housing Element will not have a sign if.i cant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II. The proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial conformance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the Government Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the request of the State Department of Housing and Community Development. 3. The proposed Housing Element Amendment is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan as provided through the organization and construction of the General Plan into super ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GP HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 27, 1991 Page s elements in which the goal, objectives, and policies contained in these elements are interrelated and dependant upon one another, and as a result of the recent technical update Co the General Plan adopted January 9, 1989. 9. The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the overall housing goal through the development and required implementation of the five-year action program and quantified objectives which promote the preservation, maintenance, improvement, and develoomenr ~f ~~.~~±^; uppo rtunrt ies for all economic segments of the community. VI. COR Rx'Sp!1Nn .!; This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley ~Da~ty a,l~l etin newspaper in a three- column ad. Notices have been posted in both the neighborhood and community centers and at City Hall. In addition, copies of the text and hearing notices were sent to the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and the local chapter of the Building Industry Association (BIA). Notices of the hearing were also sent to members of the Citizens Housing Task Force formed to provide recommendations regarding the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that after considering information contained in the oral and written staff report and after hearing public testimony, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval f the Gcnerai Pian Housing Element Revision 90-03A to the City Council, and recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectf ly submitted, Brad Ter City Tanner BB:CN/jfs Attachments: Exhibit A - Comment Letter from the Department of Housing and Community Development Exhibit B - Summary of Staff's responses to HCD comments Exhibit C - The Revised 1991 Draft Housing element Resolution Recommending Approval ~b7 STAR OF UIIFCRNIA GE09GE ~EONME)IAN, Go.~rnor DEPARThi'cFiT OF iivi)SiFiv AFiii COivVmiiNiT'i vEVELOFiv:ENi ~jy~ Housing Policy Development ~\~.~/',~ Division 1800 Third Street, Room 4J0 ~ ., ~;~ _ P.0. Box 952057 ~•~ ~ " '~:. ~~ Sacramento, CA 94252-2057 " " (916) 323-3176 December 12, 1990 Mr. JACK Lam City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 oEC 171990 7i8~9)D)ll(12)1)2)9i4)S~8 RE: Review of Rancho Cucamonga's Draft Eousiaq Element Dear Mr. Iam: Thank you for submitting Rancho Cucamonga's draft housing element, received October 29, 1990. As you know, we are required to review draft housing elements and report our findings to the locality (Government code Section 65585(b)). Rancho Cucamonga's housing element is a well-written and comprehensive document that includes mur.,h useful information about the City. In our opinion, however, there are several areas which require revisions to bring the element into compliance with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). Our review has been facilitated by a telephone conversation on November 28, 1990, with Cindy Norris, Associate Planner. This letter and Appendix summarize the conclusions of that discussion. The "Supplemental Housing Element Information" appendix attached to this letter contains information about recent legislative changes that may affect your housing programs. For your information, a recent California State Supreme Court Decision (Davis v. 8erkelev, 51 Ca1.3d. 227, 272 Cal. Rptr. 1J9, 794 P. 2d. 897) has eliminated uncertainty with regard to using general or "blanket" Article 74 authority to develop low-rent housing. The Court found that a ballot measure need not be site specific or project specific. Thus, housing sponsors may proceed with the construction or acquisition of publicly-assisted or publicly-owned low-rent housing projects which rely on pre-existing or future general Article 34 authority. •~ l~Q . Sack Lam Page Two We hope our comments are helpful to the City. If you have any questions about our comments, please contact Mario Angel of our staff at (916) 445-3485. In accordance with their requests pursuant to the Public Records Act, we are forwarding a copy of this letter to the individuals listed below. Sincerely, -Nancy J. favor, Chief Housing Policy Development Division NSJ:MA:bt Attachment cc: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Eileen Mccarthy, California Rural Legal Assistance Jerold Walsh, Cox, Castle and Nicholson Law Firm David Booher, California Housing Council Western Center on Law S Poverty Jonathan Lehrer-Graiwer, Attorney at Law Ana Marie Whitaker, Calif. State University Pomona Joe Carreras, Southern California Association of Governments Ka thlean Mikkelsan, Deputy Attorney General Bob Cervantes, Governor's Office of Planning and Research Richard Lyon, California Building Industry Association Kerry Harrington Morrison, California Association of Realtors Marc Brown, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation Christine D. Reed, Orange County Building Industry Association Rob Wiener, California Coalition Por Rural Housing ~~9 APPENDIX city of Aaacho Cucamonga The following changes would, in our opinion, bring Rancho Cucamonga's housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Following each recommended change we cite the supporting section of the Government Code. Where particular program examples or data sources are listed, these are suggestions fur your information only. We recognize that Rancho Cucamonga may choose other means oP complying with the law. A. Review and .Rayiainn Review the previous element to evaluate appropriateness and reflect the results of this review in the revised element (section 65588 (a)). "Appropriateness of goals, objectives and policies" (Section 65588 (a) (1)): A description of how the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the updated element incorporate what has been learned Prom the results of the prior element. Although the element provides results of the earlier element's programs on pages A-108 to A-128, it does not describe how its goals, objectives, policies, and programs incorporate what has been learned from the results of the prior element. Hon$in Nee 9 Ra90IIIC8S. and COnetraint9 Analyze the special housing needs of farmworkers (Section 65583 (a} (6)}. An adequate analysis should include an estimate of the total number of persons or households; a quantification and qualitative description of the need; and identification of potential solutions and resources to address the need. The most recent data shouid be used for all needs analyses. Information on farmworkers may be available from local social service departments, the State Employment Development Department, Farm Bureau offices, the County Agriculture Commissioner and the County housing authority. In response to your request for the definition of farmworkers, the following definition is used by this Department's Farmworker Housing Grant Program: "agricultural employee" or "employee" means one engaged in agriculture, which includes farming in all its branches, and, among other things, includes the cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, the llo production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural commodities (including commodities defined as agricultural commodities in Section 1101j (q) of Title 12 of the United States Code), the raising of livestock, bees, furbearinq animals, or poultry, and any practices (including any forestry or lumbering operations) performed by a farmer or on a farm as incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, including preparation for market and delivery to storage or to market or to carriers for transportation tc market. Incorporate in the projected housing needs analysis the City's share oP the regional housing need by income level, adootfld in Anttthorn /`alifnrniw aeenniaf inn of Governments (SLAG) Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) (Section 65587(a)(1)). The regional needs numbers listed in the element are the advisory SLAG figures. The element should use the officially adopted figures cited in Table 10, page ZV-7 of SCAG's 1988 Recional Housing Needs Assessment of Southern California, December 1988. Analyze potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels including land use controls, building codes and enforcement procedures, and local processing and permit procedures (Section 65583 (a} (4)). The analysis of building codes and their enforcement should discuss any local amendments to the State Housing Law or the model codes adopted into it by reference, and should analyze the type and/or degree of enforcement. For example, a locality's preservation or code enforcement program, while possibly of great value in countering deterioration, could also unduly penalize older dwellings built under less demanding codes (Section 17922 (c) of the Health and Safety Code). An analysis oP land use controls should examine the City's zoning policies, including densities, development standards (for example, minimum lot frontage, lot sizes, setback and building height requirements, and parking requirements), and other land use policies, including open space requirements. The element should clarify the time required for review of residential project applications and describe any differences between single-family and multifamily project applications. The element should analyze these and related City policies and determine whether the policies act as a constraint in the locality. Identified constraints should be addressed in the housing program section. Expand the analysis of the availability of financing as a potential and actual nongovernmental constraint upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels (Section 65583(a)(5)). The analysis of the availability of financing should consider whether financing is generally available, whether interest rates are significantly different from surrounding areas, and whether there are under-served areas or income groups i n r~,o _ _ - •-:ty ;.,,. new uunscructlon or rehabilitation loans.• Knowledge oP this will assist the community to select and implement responsive housing programs such as mortgage revenue bonding, a mortgage credit certificate program, or targeted low-interest rehabilitation loans. Information on the availability of financing may be available from local financial institutions under the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (IGiDA), which requires specified lending institutions to disclose the number, amount, and location of mortgage and rehabilitation loans originated or purchased, and under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which requires that specified lending institutions help meet the credit needs of their communities. The CRA requires that each lending institution covered by Che Act provide maps describing its landing areas and information about the types of loans it provides, and that a public file be established containing written comments from the community regarding the institution's CRA performance. Lending institutions not covered under HMDA may be required to provide comparable information by State disclosure law (Section 35816 of the Health and Safety Code). C. Aousimg Proarama While the element includes an extensive array of policy and program statements, the program section of the element should include more detailed program descriptions and more strongly indicate commitment by the City to implement each program action to ensure the City can meet housing element requirements (Section 65583 (c)(1-5)). Terms such as "consider" and "encourage" do not indicate a commitment to implement. Examples of programs to be ~~ expanded or which should include a stronger commitment to implement include, but are not limited to, the following: Program 3.A.1: How will the City "facilitate opportunities for a variety of housing types..."? Will the City offer incentives, authorize the use of pre-approved project plans, or require minimum lot or zoning configurations? Program 5.A.4: For your information, the city must comply with State Density Honus Law during the study period to determine implementation measures. We have included a technical assistance paper which describes recant amendments to the law. Program S.A.5: How will the City encourage developers to utilize rental assistance programs? What incentives would be offered? Program 8.A.3: The City's intent to consider revising permit processing procedures for projects using redevelopment 20 percent set-asides does not, in our opinion, commit the City to any specific actions. Program 9.A.1: The element (page A-65) contains a number of program proposals to modify the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy and Implementation Program. These recommendations are not included in the prcgram section of the element. In our opinion, these recommendations would make strong program options for the utilization of the agency's funds. The City should review these proposals and support and implement those it determines could best meet the element's goals and objectives. The element indicates that between 1,346 and 1,946 households (Housing Assistance Plan, page A-72; and Southern California Association of Governments, page 7 and 6H) are in need of rental assistance. The City may wish to include a program to address the needs of lower- income households in need of rental assistance. A significant percentage of this group may be at risk of becoming homeless. Other ToD10! Describe the City's efforts to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of its housing element (Section X13 65553(c)). Yn addition to holding public hearings at the planning commission and governing body level, the City could circulate its draft element to church groups, housing organizations, social service agencies, and community and senior groups. Notices regarding public meetings on the element 'could be posted in community centers, libraries, City Nall, and throughout the community in public places. Describe the means by which consistency will be achieved with other general plan elements (Section 65583 (c)). The goals, policies, and objectives of the housing element maV nnn TT inh ui f~. •~.__~ - lduu use, circulation, and open space elements, zoning ordinances, congestion management plans, redevelopment, and capital improvement plans. Conflicts between general plan elements should be acknowledged and the plan amended to eliminate such conflicts. A broader discussion of general plan consistency requirements may be found in the Governor's Office of Planning and Research General Plan Guidelines. B: \NUMpIG ~~I SUPPLEMENTAL HOUSING ELEMENT INFORMATION The following information represents recent legislative changes in housing element or State planning law. This information is provided for your general information and to assist you in updating your housing element. Chapter 1451, Statutes of 1989, require all housing elements to include, by January 1, 1992, additional needs analyses and programs to address the potential conversion of existing assisted housing developments to non-low-income housing uses a_ri :, - .-- .-yaa~ l.aaiuu (uovernmanc code Section 65583 (a)~(8) and~(c)(6)). Assisted housing developments are defined to include any multifamily rental housing assisted under any of the fallowing programs: 1. Federal: Section 8, 213, 221(d)(3), 236, 202, and 101; CDBG and FmHA Section 515. 2. State: Multifamily revenue bonds 3. Local: Multifamily revenue bond, redevelopment, in- lieu, inclusionary, and density bonus program units with affordability controls. HCD is developing a technical assistance document to assist localities in meeting the new requirement. Chapter 1140, Statutes of 1989, amends housing element law (Section 65583(c)) to require the housing program of an element to include, by January 1, 1990, a description of the use of moneys in a redevelopment agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund if the locality has established a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law (Division 24 (commencing with Section 73000) of the Health and Safety Code). Recently enacted State general obligation bond programs established by Proposition 77 (California Earthquake Safety and Housing Rehabilitation Bond Act of 1988) and Proposition 84 (Housing and Homeless Bond Act of 1988) are currently available to assist localities with funding to implement low- and very low-income housing programs. These funds may be used for the following activities: 0 acquisition and rehabilitation of rental housing and residential hotels, ~ rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing, i seismic rehabilitation of multifamily rents: housing, Ifs ^ rental housing corstruction, ^ acquisition and rehabilitation oP emergency shelters, ^ development of migrant farm labor centers, and 0 development of congregate housing for families and the elderly. t rquiries regarding these and other assistance programs offered by HCD should be directed to: California Department of Nousinq and Community Development Division of Community Affairs P.O. BoX 952054 Aanrwmontn. CA 9d2ri2-2n5d Telephone (916) 322-1560 4. Chapter 842, Statutes of 1989, amended State density bonus law (Government Code Sections 65913.4, 65915 and 65917) by providing for additional local incentives for affordable • ~ housing units and strengthening income targeting requirements, among other changes. We have attached a copy of the amended law for your information. HCD is developing a technical assistance document to assist localities in meeting the new requirements. Chapters 1571 and 1572, Statutes of 1988, require that manufactured housing must be permitted on permanent foundation systems on all single-family-zoned lots, so long as the unit is no more than ten years old on the date of application, and meets federal and optional local standards specified in Government Code Section 65852.3. (A locality may exempt from this provision any place, building, structure, or other abject listed on the National Register of Nistoric Places.) Section 65852.3 specifies that local governments may impose architectural requirements on the manufactured home itself which are limited to roof overhang, roofing material, and siding material, so long as the requirements, or any other lot development standards imposed on the manufactured home installation, do not exceed those required for a conventional home on the same lot. Section 65852.4 has been added to the Government Code to specify that a locality may not subject an application to install a manufactured home on a foundation system on a single-family lot to any administrative permit, planning, or development process or requirement unless it is identical to those which would be imposed on a conventional home on the same lot. I~ RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTNENT OF SOU8ING AND COI®SQNITY DEVELOPNENT CONMENTS The following summarizes revisions made to the Housing Element in response to comments received from the Department of Housing and Corununity Development (HCD). The revisions included in the text have been prepared following the spirit and intent of those comments toward ensuring that our Housing Element is in substantial compliance with the requirements of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. A. ?eview and kevi¢' Section XI of Chapter Three of the Housing Element containing the evaluation of the previous element's goal, objectives, policies, and programs has been revised to provide further discussion on how the revised element's goal, objectives, policies, and programs incorporate what has been learned from the results of the prior element. This has been accomplished by the inclusion of an "action" statement after each discussion section to describe i~ow the results of the evaluation and analysis of the previous element are to be incorporated into the revised element. g, u~u s,'_nq,N da. Rea d -'nf 1. A thorough evaluation of the special needs of farmworkers in the City has been provided, and can be found in Chapter 3, Section VII, Page A-87 of the Element. As part of the analysis staff contacted those agencies suggested by HCD. In addition, an analysis of previous fazmworker needs, as identified in the 1880 Census was provided. r~~ It was found that persons engaged in farming, forestry, and fishing occupations in 1980 comprised only .25~ of the City's population. Based upon the amount of development that has occurred since 1980, it is believed that the number of persons currently involved in these occupations is significantly lower. Persons contacted regarding numbers of farmworkers in the City were unable to provide information regarding current figures, although the State Employment Development Department did indicate that the need for farmworkers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga has dropped drastically in recent years, It is felt, therefore, that housing opportunities for farmworkers can be accommodated through expansion of the City's affordable housing stock, 2. The regional needs numbers provided in the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG) 1988 Regional Housing Needs Assessment of Southern California, Table 10, have been incorporated into the Housing Element as requested. Although, it should be noted that in this same document SCAG indicated support for use of the advisory figures in place of [he adopted allocations when a community felt that those numbers better represented the level of need that may occur in the housing element planning period. 3. Additional discussion has been added to the Governmental Constraints section of the Element, Chapter 3, Pages A-103 to A-118, regarding land use and zoning, building codes 'I4 and their enforcement, as well as a description of the City's residential review process. Based upon this discussion and analysis it was determined that the City's governmental processing procedures and standards of development do not pose a significant hardship on the development of affordable housing. Howe ve r, Program B.A.3 has been added to the Element requiring the City to evaluate established project review processing procedures to determine whether expedited processing is possible for housing developments using the Redevelopment Agency's 20 percent set-aside funds or for projects proposing a proportion of units affordable to lower income households. The City has made a diligent effo rt toward obtaining information regarding the availability of financing from the various local financial institutions located in the Community. Staff conducted a phone survey of the 12 lending institutions which have offices or branch offices located in Rancho Cucamonga. The banks were questioned regarding the general availability of financing in all areas of the City and the possibility tF.at interest rates varied for different areas of the community. Sn addition, the City was able to obtain copies of their Community Reinvestment Act Sta[ements from some of the institutions. t19 As a result, the City was provided with verbal and written statements by these institutions affirming that their lending practices are based upon each individual applicant's credit- worthiness, without regard for such factors as sex, race, age, marital status, income level, social composition of an area, or the age or location of a dwelling. Also, based upon evidence of const runt ion activity on available vacant land, residential financing appesrs to be generally available throughout the City, There is no evidence of any mortgage deficient areas for new const ructior. oc rehabilitation loans. C. floasina Proa~ams 1. The letter received by the City from HCD expressed concern with the wording of some of the programs contained in the revised Element, as it rzlated to the City's intent toward carrying cut the implementation of those programs. Although Rancho Cucamonga has every intention of following up on and completing the programs as stated in the element, the language contained in these action statements was reviewed and revised in order to indicate a stronger commitment toward their implementation. The programs are contained in Chapter 2 of the Revised Housing Element. Two items of particular concern that were raised in the comments involved Programs 3.A.1 and 9.A.1. The following provides an additional explanation regarding these programs: r2-a Program 3.A.!: The question was raisad about how the City will "facilitate opportunities for a variety of housing types." As previously stated in the Program, and as it continues to state, opportunities for a variety of housing types will be facilitated through the implementation of the Land Use Plan, Development District Map, and the Community Plans on the remaining vacant land resources ox the ury, ns rte... idcd in the discussion in Chapter 3, Section i0, regarding the Rancho Cucamonga's Land Dse and Zoning, the distribution of available land use categories throughout the City and the variability of development standards allowed in the City's Development Code and Community Plans provides for a wide variety of housing types to be developed, Program 9.A.1: Regarding the City's development an Affordable Housing Stratagy ...~ use of *_he Redevelooment Agency's 20 percent set-aside funds, the comment that the City has proposals to "modify" the Strategy are incorrect. Prior to development of this draft Strategy, the City did net have a consolidated housing program for use of i.ts 20 percent set aside funds, It is through pzeparation of this Strategy, which has riot yet been adopted, that the City will develop a comprehensive pzogram. Once the Strategy has been approved and adopted, the Housing Element will then be revised as necessary to ~a r ensure consistency between the documents. A further discussion of the Redevelopment Affordable Hovsing Strategy is provided in Chapter 3, Section 6, Page A-65. 2. In response to the statement that the City may wish to include a program to address the needs of lower income households in need of rental assistance we would like to point out that there are already four programs contained in the element which address this concern. These programs are contained in Objective Area 5 and can be summarized as follows: Program S.A.2: Provides for the continuation of the Residential Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. Program S.A.5: That the City shall encourage private developers to utilize Federal rental assistance programs by providing informational documents regarding these programs to applicants early in the review process. Program S.A.6: The City shall continue to support the use of a voluntary rent stabilization, known as the Mobile Home Park Accord, as a means of keeping rents at reasonable levels to allow the continued affordability of this method of housing. Program S.A.7; That the City shall develop and implement an Affordable Housing Strategy to utilize the Redevelopment 20 percent tax increment fund which will include programs aimed at maintaining and/or providing affordable rental housing, d~' u. nrno. m....'-- 1. The City has in rluded an expanded dis russion to Chapter 1, Paqe 3 regarding efforts to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in development of the draft Housing Element. In addition to holding public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council, efforts to achieve public participation included the :.,i iuwing: Three-column size ads were provided in the hand Va~i v n :~y B•t~"~:~ a newspaper of general circulation, prior to both public hearings and notices were posted in the City's communit }• and neighborhood centers, as well as at the Civic Center. Copies of the text and notice of the meetings were given to the Chamber o£ Commerce and local chapter of the Building Industry Association. In addition, public notices were sent to the m?mbe rs o. ,...z Citizens Advisory Task Force, which had originally been formed to advise City Redevelopment Staff and the City Council Housing Subcommittee in the development of the Affordable Housing Strategy £or use of the Redevelopment Agency's 209 set-aside funds. Task force members represented a broad cross-section of the community and included representatives from the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commer^.e, major lenders, for- profit developers, neighborhood leaders, senior citizens and mobile home park residents. r~~ 2. A Section has been added to Chapt!+r 1, Page 4, to describe the means by which consistency is achieved with other General Plan elements. This is achieved prima r.ily through periodic updates to the General Plan but is also achieved as a result of the organization and construction of the General Plan document itself. /~~ AESOLVTION NO. 91-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03 A, TO REVISE AND UPOATB THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ANO MAE ZNG FINDINGS TN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Aec ita L. iii T••~ -icy - uilw wcamunga nu i11w an application foc General Plan Amendment VNO.~ 190-03A as deseribetl in the title of thi• Reaolution. Hereinaltez in thLe Aaaolut SOn, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the appllcat SOn." (ii) On February 27, and continued to March 13, and March 27, 1991, the Planning Commiulon o! the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducNd tluly noticed public haarinq• on tN application. (iii) All legal prerequisibe prior to the tdaptlon of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it i• hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of tM City o! Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Tni• CommL•ion hereby specifically Linda that all of the facts set Eorth in the Rec itaL, Part A, of thia Resolut inn are true and correct. 2. Baud upon wbrtant Ll evidwce prevented to this Commieeion during the above-referenced public hearings on February 27, March 13, and March 27, 1991, including written and oral sLtt report, together with public testimony, this commLaion hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed revision and amendarnt of the Houaing Elame nG will not have • •ignifieant Lmpaet on the environment a evidenutl by the coot iuaione and findings of the Initial Study Part II; an0 (b) The proposed Housing 83ement Amendment is in substantial conformance with the provisions of Article 10.6 0[ the California Government Code ae evidenced 6y the revisions made to the document at the request of the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and (c) TM pcopood Housing Element i• coneietmt with the other elements of the General Plan a^ provided through tM organization and construction of the Ceneral Plan into caper •lea;enb in which the goal, objectivae, and policiu contained in then elements are interrelated and dependent upon one another, and a• a ruult of [M recent twhnical update to the Genacal Plan adopted January 8, 19 H9; and /~ S PLANNING CONHISS ION RESOLVT ION NO. .. _. GPA 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA ns rch 2~, 1991 Page 2 (d) The proposed amentlment furthsn the attainment o! the city's overall houainq goal through the development and Lnplemencat ion of tM five-year action progrua end quantified objective which promote the preervat ion, mainGnanee, and dwelopsent of houainq opportunitio for all economic segments of the eoamun ity. 3. Based upon the subetanC lal ev idenee presented to thin Commission during the abovrrefenneed publ lc hearings and upon the apetit is findings of face sac forth Ln paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Cosmieion hereby £inde and concludes as follows; l•; ~„~~ -„p w.ud Hoeing Element Amsntlment is in conformance with the General Plan. (b) That the proposed Houdnq Element Amendment w111 not haw signif iesnt impacts on the environment. (e) That the proposed Nouslnq Clemens Amendment is in substantial compliance with the prow Liens of Article 10.6 of t!u California Govstnmmt code. a. (a) The Planning Commicion epee Lfieally [inde ana determines chat a Negaeiw Declaration [or this project has been prepared in compliance with the cal ifornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 a amended and the qu ideLines promulgated thereunder; snd, further, this Commis ion finds and determines that, based upon the findings set tooth in Sections 1, 2, and 3, that no significant adwre environmental effects will occur. (b) The Planning Comsie ion Linde that the tetra supporting [he above-specified Findings are contained in the Negative Declarer ion, the Staff Report and exhibits, and the information provided to thin commission during [ha public Bearings; and, therefore, Lhie Commicion hereby reconmends ie euancs of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon CM findings and eonclusione et forth In paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Cosmiuion hereby resolve that pursuant to Saet ion 65850 to 65855 of the Celltoeni• Govecnment Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day cf March 1991 0[ Geeral Plan Amendment No. 90-03A. 6. The Secretary to Lhie Coemiuion shall cart sty to tM adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THTS 27TH DAY OP MARCH 1991. PLANNING CO! ISSlON O[ THE CITY O~ RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY: ~ _ Larry NcN ie 1, Chauman ` J~ /d ~ PLANNING COMMISSTON RESOLUTION NO. 91--'d GPA 90-WA - CITY OP AANCNO CUCANONGA March 27, 1991 Page 3 ATTESTi ra B 1Y, atary i, Brad Butler, Saeratazy of tha Planning Commiulon oC tRa City of Rancho Cucamonga, da haraby certify that tha foragoinq Raaolution waa duly and regularly Lntroducad, pauad, and adopted by the Planning Commisaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at • regular mgtinq of the Planning Commie ion held on the 27th day of Nazch 1991r by tRe followln9 vote-to-wit: AYES: COMNI SSIONEA3: CNITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCNEA. TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMI53IONLNS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~a~ NEARIN B. V - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA - In scan rdance with Att icle 10.6, Section 6558E of the California Government Cadr, a revL ion end updaU to the City Housing Element hu barn prepared. Thr changes [o thr docuaunt include: an update of the Technical Appendix eonsiet inq of doeumenttt ion and analysis of current demographic trends, statLatical information and housing au ietance needs? updaG and rw isions to the City's housing objaetivu and policies; and development of a five year action program designed to implement the City's overall housing goal. In addition, staff recomma~ds issuance o! a Negative Declaration. Latty Henderson, Principal Planner, presentetl the staff report. Chairman McNirl opened the Public Nearing. There were no public comments. Chairman McNlel ale eed the Public Hearing. Commi a ionrr Maleher expxeseed concern about [he affordab la houeinq etratagy. He felt that an •lrment of our General Plan Le being driven by a document Ghat is not part of that plan and Ls taking things out et order. Mr. Henderson explained the affordable houa inq ettatrgy addresses how Lha Redevelopment Agency will spend the required 20 percent low and moderate income money. Ne stated that when the Council decides what specific ettateg iee will be adopUd, they will be incorporated Into the housing element document antl the housing element will be integrated into the General Plan. Comm ieeioner Helcher inquired if there is a set time frame for completion of the strategy. Hr. Henderson responded that thaxa is no apaciflc data far the etratagy tc ba presented to council and because of the addition of a new subcommittee member, it ie taking the subcommittee a little longer to proeeee the i^.format ion and return it to Council. He otimated it would W anothrr two to throe months before the item will go befots Council. Cemmieeioner Mdcher requested informal i.on an the 20 percent set-aside fund e. He wished to know if the funds are currently being wt adds and also if an urgency exists to provide housing for these who currently do not have lt. Mr. Henderson replird that the funds are being set aside and tgned that there ie a sense of urgency, but large amounts of money are involved and it ie necessary to ensure that the program will work on a long term basis. He commented that Chic year alone there i• about $6,000,000 available for this program and that amount will almost double every year. Ne commented that the Radavdopment Agency has not had this nanny on hold, it has moved to earmark Planning Commission Minuiee -6- February 27, 1991 /~~. E nti ~ e';t C certain propett ie• in the City for landbankinq with the is untion of poe•ib ly purchesd.nq certain ptopart iss for low income housing projects. Commie ionsr Mslcher eked if the money was actually being spent for properties now. Mr. Henderson teeponded ihnt Sf Lt isn't being spent now, it in being al LOCnted and put aside for apvciCis property negotintiona. Commissioner Mslcher thought that sounded ae if the strategy i• 6sinq written io fit the spending agenda already adopted. Mr. Henderson dieagrestl, eiat Lnq that this method left the Cliy'e options open to negot iab jw! a• one would normaay do when purchasing property. H¢ eonwsnbd that the AttordabL Houstna st rat.rrv „tn ..,..~... ..,.nt,.. ~...:......... it w111 not b¢ arbitrarily adopted. H¢ further camnented that the strategy would b. the largest resource avalleble to the City to provide affordable houatnq. Commiaeioner Meloher inquized how crucial action is on thl• Lta:a tonight becauu ha felt the commie ion nudsd more time to review Lhe draft. Mr. Henderson felt a two-oak eontinuanoe would W approptinte. chairman Mex1e1 re-opened the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by xalehsr, seconded by Valletta, to continua Env ironm¢ntal A99e6eme nt and General Plan Housing Element Revision 90-03A to the Harch 13, 1991 Planning Commie ion meeting. Mat ion carried by th¢ following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CH IT IEA, MCNIEL, MELCHERr TOLSTOY, VA[.LETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CONHSSSIOHERS: NONE -carried C. ENVIPONNENTlL Acasaau¢ua aw0 CONDITION VSE P IT 90 60 WEST COAST PERPORN/NG ARTS - The ragout to utablieh a tlanee end vocal tralninq school in a Lued apace of 5,938 aquas tact within an existing commerc Ll center on 10.5 acre of land in the Specialty Commercial Distrlet (SUbazu 2) of the Ppochill Boulevard 9pae ific Plan, located at 7965 Vineyard Avenue, P8-P 13 - APN: 208-1C1-30. Staff recommends iuuance of a N¢gative Declaration. Bruce Buckingham, Planning Techntcian, pruenbd the staff report. commiuioner Msle!ter inquired Lf the Buildtnq Department had my input regarding the Pire District's report. Ha aLo asked if this space was originnlly approves a¢ oaf ice space. Planning Commies ipn Minutes -S- February 37, t95: /~9 Notion: Hovel by Chitlw, ateandtd by ToLtoy to font inue Time ExtatsYOrt and Hodi[leeClon CO Tentative Tract 14055 to March 27, 1991• Hot ion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CXITZEA, HCNIEL, MELCHEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: CONMISSIONBRS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONEASs NONE -carried • . . F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO GENEML PLAN HOOBINC EL61dNT REVISION 90-OJA - CITY Ot' RANCHO CUCAMONCA - rn •nrn~w....~ ...,.. _- ~ - 65588 of the calitornia Government coda, • revision and update to she city Houalnq Element Au Wen prepeted. The ohanges to the document include: an updaG of the Technical Appendix cotslst inq o[ documentation and analysis of current demographic tnnde, etatLtiul information ana Houalnq au ietanw nNda; updtW and twislona to the City'• hooting obj ect ivu and policLy and development of • five year action program deaigtsd to implement the Ciay'• overall houeinq goal. In addition, atntt recommends Lauanee of a Negative Oeclatat ion. (Continued from February 27, 1991.) Brad Buller, Cley PLnmr, stated that the !tw had Wen continued trom the February 27, 1991, Planning Commission meeting at the request of the CommLalon. Commissioner Helcher requested that Che item be continued until Herch 27, 1991, to allow time for hLm to review his concerts alth staff. Commieeionet Vallatte at ated eW felt comfortable with the alemenG a^ it was writ bn. Chairman McNiel opened the publ le hearing and there were no comments. Moi ion: Movsd by Melchor, seconded by NcNlel, to continue Envizo,unental Aeaeasmen[ and General Plan Housing 61eaMnt Revision 90-03A to March 27, 1991. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMNISSIONSRS: CNITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT= COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Planning Commission Minutes -5- /30 March 1J, 1991 Exti'1 b':t ~ D s~ F`t- FGR DISCUSSIi?tH r"~RPGSES LDi=t AYES: COMMIS SIONBR9: CHITIEA, NCNIEL, MELCNEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOE9: COMMISSIONBRS: NONB ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONB -carried C. 8NV•AONNENTA_ ASSHSS!@NT A_D GENEA. P N HOU ING NT VISION 90 0 - CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA - In aCCOrdanrs with Art icls 10.6, Section 65588 of the Cal ifornLa Govsrnmsni Code, a raviaion and update to the City Housing Elamsnt has been prepared. Ths chan9as Lo Lhe dccumvnt include: an update of the Technical Appendix caneisting of documentation and analysis of currant demographic trends, etatlstlcsl Snformet ion and A ~..-!n -l-V --.... -A-. ..,. _.. ...__._.._ ..____. _~____ _.._ __.___-.._ __ _--~ ..--_-..y objectives and policissJ and development of a five year action program dsalgnstl to implement the City's overall housing goal. In addition, staff reeommende Leeuenea of a Negative Oeelaration. (Continued from March 13, 1991.) Larry Henderson, Principal Plnnner, presented the staff report and suggested minor wording clarification to same of the text. Chairman XeNiel asked it the Housing 6lemsnt approached the target with respect to low ineoms housing In the City or if it only rsflsutatl where assistance ie concerned. Mr. Henderson reepondetl that the sttts houainq lsw requires that cities make reasonable efforts in reaching the goal, but it is often beyond the local juriediction'a ability to meet the goal setablishad by the regional agency. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Theta were no comments, and hs closed the public hearing. Cora;iea inner Helrhaz thanked the staff for mssiing with him to haip him underetantl et ate law requirements. Ne thanked the Commies ion members for their patience in allowing the tour-week continuants. Ne said he understood there may be adj ustmenfe when the CLty Count ll acts on affordable houainq strategy. 9e requested that the Planning CommLSion Do permitted to view how the two aspects would W blended together. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, eecontletl by Valletta, to recommend approval of a Negative Declaration and adopt the Reeolutlon recommending approval of Environmental Aeeesemant and General Plan Housing Element Revision 90-03 A. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIHA, NCNIEL, !B!LCHEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMN ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONH -carried Planning Commission Hinutee -4- f March 27, 1991 Exin~b':t E RESOLUTION NO• ~/. I(O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, AF pROVI NG GENERAL PLAN AMENDNENT 90-03A, TO REVISE AND DPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AAT ICLE 10.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recital8. (i) The city of Rancho Ncamonga has filed a __:___.,.. :tea General Plan am^.a-__t ~ >u-u ew as described in the ^title •oE this Resolution. Hereinafter•Vin this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is reEerxed to as ^the application." (i i) On February 27, and continued to March 13, and March 27, 1991, the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly notrced public hearings on the application and recommended adoption of the Aeviaed Housing Element and issuance of a Negative Declaration by its adoption of Resolution No. 91-2H. (iii) On Apr11 17, 1991, the City Couneil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. ResalUt io n. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the CS ty of Rancho Cueaaan ga ae fo llow5: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2• Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 17, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: fa) The proposed revision and amendment of the Housing element will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II; and (b) The proposed Nousinq Element Amendment is in substantial conE ormance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the request of the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and ~~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 90-03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Apr11 17, 1991 na ge ? (c) The proposed Houainq Element is conaiatent with the other elements of the General Plan ae provided through the organization and construction of the General Plan into super elements in which the goal, objectives, and p.7liciee contained in these elements are interrelated and dependent upon one another, and as a result of the recent technical update to the General Plan adapted January 4, 1989; and (d) The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the City's overall housing goal through the development and implementation of the E ive-year action program and quantified objectives which promote the preservation, maintenance, and development of housing opportunities for all aCOllOmiC se cements of thn rn.mm,.n1 ~~. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific £inaing% of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby flnde and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in conferments with the General Plan. (b) That the proposed Housing Element Amendment will not have significant impacts on the environment. (c) That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in substantial compliance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. 4. (a) The City Council specifically finds and determines that a Negative Declaration for this project has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended and the guidelines nmm,q pates thereunder; un3, furt.`.er, title Cuuncii finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1, 2, and 3, that no aignif icant adverse environmental effects will occur. (b) The City Council finds that the facts supporting the above- specified findings are contained in the Negative Dec le ration, the Planning Commies ion recommendation, the Staff Report and exhibits, and the information provided to this Council during the public hearings; and, therefore, this Council hereby recommends Issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Ha sad upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs t, 2, 3, and 9 above, this Council hereby resolves thaC pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 17th day of April 1991 of General plan Amendment No. 90-03A. X33 -- ------ CITY OF' RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REFdR,T DATE: April 11, 1991 ~ _ T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer j BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer I SUBJECT: Recoemendation to estab175h a speed limit of 40 MPH on ~ Highland Avenue from Carnelian Street to Saoohlre Street i RECONEMDATIOM: It is recommended that Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code be amended to provide for a speed limit of 40 MPH on Highland Avenue from Carnelian Street to Sapphire Street; and making findings thereof. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code allow titles to set speed limits in accordance with specific engineering surveys in order to more precisely estaDitsh the "reasonable and prudent" speed required under basic State speed law. This speed then becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could occur. Such a survey, less than 5 years old, is also required where radar is used for enforcement. A survey as required above has been conducted on Highland Avenue. The survey involved the determination of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for any conditions not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of this survey is summarized in the attached table. After review of these results, it was feund that the safety record of Highland Avenue is well within expected levels and there are no unusual conditions not apparent to drivers. On Highland Avenue, the traffic survey revealed the maJority of drivers going from 33 to 44 MPH, a prevailing speed of 44 Lo 45 MPH, and a lower than expected accident rate. This section of Highland Avenue has limited access with nine intersecting residential streets. Thus, the observed prevailing speeds must be the predominant consideration in deterniTntng the speed limit. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESTABLISH SDEED LIMIT OF 40 MPN OM HIGHLAND FRCN CARNELIAN TO SeooulRE APRIL 17, 1991 PAGE 2 CONCLUSION A speed Limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on the street and sail provide for effective enforcement. A speed limit such as this is set at, Tn most cases, the first 5 NPN increment below the speed at which 85 percent of the drivers are going. If accident rates are higher than expected, a further 5 MPH reduction from the 85 percent level accompanied with a higher ievel of enforcement should reduce the accident rate to within expected levele The proposed speed 1lmtts are expected to be exceeded by 298 to 42% of the drivers observed, however the limits should provide an effective tool for law enforcement due to the circumstances under which they will be in force. Respectfully submi,l ~~ ' WJO:PAR:BMPay cc: Dan Glass, Chatiman, Public Safety Commission Attachment t rJ~ 9 ~i C ~ ~ c~ ~ U U o ~ U ~_ rJ ~-- O >-, ~_ U !3~ N Y ~ ~ 2 M W } C Y L O I Y Y k•y~M•~I~Y M i UW Y W1- 4a M WO Y W A k O O ~I ~WOY 4FW~ 6NW` 601 a4N~ l no ~ aw ~ UW O + W 6 ~' C ~l •}~Y/~ OnW~ m W1]L~ P t~i¢N} N N W~ a u~ x u} w ¢~ Pte} O N Ttt~ O •~ YF ~61~i1 hN rO i SPUY O O PU} NaW }Z ~ ]I W I' O nT l IpJ S V Y D f V M6^aM O I11 } } F S of a WWY L L' ~ V W} N S ~6a4M P i Y56 VIM m N ~O M J %OUOM 4 D MW¢W1 T i WQ0.Y p N7W~ y a Y MO iPW w P+upr P i } FW} IWn \6} .y M m "~o°w°wi i a iw~w} Y a~~4• z z }4dW} w ~ vWi T ~. i N N TO• N D ~a• n .+ M S O O ~ N N WWt SWY n r N WLL} v J ~ M O_ Y ~n O W N 4f K 4 Y K W 1}Y 4 tt i a S '1 2 } 4 ~ C Y 2 6 ~ w z o.. iJ K a~ L J. } a Z G 'f ua a 9 y Y ~~+ 137 ORDINANCE N0. ~~ w AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIM1T5 ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Secticn 22357 Provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any acreec nui a scace highway. (11) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of Lhis Ordinance. (T11) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (11), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It 1s determined by City Council resolution an upon a ass o an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima fade speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Ave. - Banyan St. to north end 50 2. Archfbald Ave. - 4th St. to Banyan St. 45 3. Arrow Rt. - Baker Ave. to Haven Ave. 45 4. Baker Ave. - Bth St. to Foothill Blvd 35 5. Banyan St. from Beryl St. to London Ave. 35 6. Banyan St. from west City Limits to Beryl St. 40 7. Base Line Rd. - west City limits to Carnelian St. 45 138' ORDINANCE APRIL 11, 1991 PAGE 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portton Affected Speed L1m1t (MPH) 8. Base Line Rd. -Carnelian St. to Hermosa Ave. 40 9. Base Ltne Rd. -Hermosa Ave. to Spruce Ave. 45 10. Beryl St. - Banyan St. to end 45 I1. Beryl St. -800' N/o Lemon Ave. to Banyan St. 40 12. Carnelian St. - Vineyard Ave. to end 45 13. Center Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 40 14. Church St. from Archibald Ave. to Elm St. 40 15. 8th St. - Grove Ave. to Haven Ave. aF t6. Ettwanda Ave. -Foothill Blvd.. to Srmmrit Ave. 45 17. Fainaont Dr. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 18. Grove Ave. - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 40 19. Haven Ave. - 4th St. to Nilson Ave. 45 20. Hellman Ave. - Foothill Bivd.. to Atta Laaa Dr. 35 21• Hellman Ave. - 500' N/o Manzanlta Dr. to Valley View 40 22. Hellman Ave. - 6th St. to Foothill Blvd. 45 23. Hermosa Ave. - Base Line Rd. to Nilson Ave. 45 24. Hermosa Ave. - Nilson Ave. to Sun Valley Or. 40 25. Hermosa Ave. - 6th St. to Base Line Rd. 45 26. Highland Ave. - Sapphire St. to Carnelian St. 40 21. Highland Ave. -Amethyst St. to Hermosa Ave. 35 28. Highland Ave. from Hermosa Ave. to 800' west of Haven Ave. 45 29. Hillside Rd. - Ranch Gate to Amethyst St. 35 30. Hillside Rd. -Haven Ave. to Canistel Ave. 35 31. Lemon Ave. -Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave. 40 32. Lemon Ave. -Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 33. Manzanlta Dr. - Hernro;a Ave. to Haven Ave. 35 34. 9th St. -Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 35. Red Hill Country Club Dr. - Foothill Blvd. to Alta Cuesta 35 36. Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40 or 45 37. San Bernardino Rd. fran Vineyard Ave. to Archibald Avenue 35 38. Sapphire St. - Banyan St. to end 45 39. Sapphire St. - 19th St. to Lemon Ave. 40 40. 7th St. -Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. 45 41. Spruce Ave. -Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Rd. 40 42. Terra Vista Parkway - Church St. to Bel pine P1. 40 43. Victoria St. -Archibald Ave. to Ramona Ave. 35 44. Victoria St. - Ettwanda Ave. to Rt. 15 40 45. Victoria St. -Haven Ave. to Mendocino P1. 40 139 ORDINANCE APRIL 17, 1991 "rFGE 3 46. Victoria Park Ln. -Fai rmont Nay to Base Line Rd. 35 47. Victoria Windrows Loop (north A south) 35 48. Vineyard Ave. - Church St. to Base Line Rd. 40 49. Vineyard Ave. - 8th SL. Lo Carnelian Ave. 45 50. Vintage Dr. - Milliken Ave. to east end 35 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected SDeed Limit (MPH) S1. wM ttram nve. - tci wanes nve. w east vi sy limits 40 52. Wilson Ave. -Amethyst Ave. to Haven Ave. 54 53. Wilson Ave. - Haven Ave. to 200' east of Canistel Ave. 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (Dart), 1982; Ord. 39 Settlon 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; (11) The miles per hour as state are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets gluing notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall Certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Section 2 The Mayor shall sign Lhis Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published Tn the City of n-0-fa"~-California, and circulated 1n the City of Rancho Cucamonga. !T~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPCI~T DATE: TO: April 17, 1991 Mayor, Member of City Council and City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director BY: Kathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation Superintendent SUBJECT: RXTENSION OF BALr FTFTD IGHTTNG HOURS AT RED HILL PA_R1C BY TWO HOCmS PFR NIGHT BFmwFFw y 7th AND TT Y 6 h 1991 A Frn~MD D BY Th PARK AND RECRFAm7na COMMISSION Recommend approval oP the variance and attached memorandum oP understanding. HACRGROi7ND At the April 3rd City Council meeting staff was directed to bring together park residents and tournament officials to write a Memorandum of Understanding. A mooting was held on Wednesday, April 10 and a copy of the memorandum ie attached for review and approval. Only one resident attended the meeting, Ms. Laurie Stallings. Ma. Marva Johnson chose not to meet but was invited to do so. Ms. Johnson instead wrote a letter to Mr. Schultz dated April 10, 1991 and is attached. ANALYSIS Most games played in the tournament are completed before the 10:00 p.m. light curfew. Initially (1S) fourteen teams will participate in the tournament: 5 Rancho Cucamonga, 3 Fontana, 1 Bloomington, 1 Colton, 4 Rialto. Deperdinq upon the outcome of the games Rancho Cucamonga teams may or may not continue in the tournament bracket. A copy of the tournament bracket is attached. Staff feels that the Memorandum of Understanding addresses the concerns brought forth by the residents and the Council. R ect idly fitted, G Jo Schultz, Co unity Se es Director v JS/KS/tp Attachments ,r I~~ Memorandum of Understanding The following points ware discussed and agreed to on Wednesday, April 10, 1991 to minimize inconvenience to the neighbors of Red Hill Community Park as they relate to the Little League Senior Tournament Yequeat from July 7 to July 26, 1991. Agreeing parties were: Neighbor: Ms. Laurie Stallings; League: Boyd Xelly, Dave Bonham; Staff: Joe Schulte, Kathy Sorensen. * Home phone numbers and a fact sheet giving details of the tournament will be distributed to homeowners adjacent to the park approximately two weeks before the tournament. The flier will include home number for Joe Schultz, - ..-.iti udl.i~.oo uisnu wr( U6V• monnam, D1strlCt 21 Representatives Boyd Kelly, President O! Citrus Little League. In addition the pay telephone number at the tield will 6e given so immediate contact can be obtained with the tournament directors. * Vineyard Street will be poste$ NO PARKING on the eastslde on Saturdays and Sundays. * A separate flier will be distributed to league participants stating that no noise makers era allowed and that participants and guests are requested to leave the park area quietly. * Overflow parking will be monitored by the league and signage provided directing participants to park at Alta Loma High School to avoid parking on Vineyard. * Sound will be checked prior to the tournament and a "lock off" device used to prevent the audio from being turned un. Staff will drop-in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. Announcing will be limited to: • General welcome • Introduction of teams • Announcement of player to the plate • Recap of runs and score between innings If violations occur with regard to amplification a warning will be issued. A continued violation may cause all amplification to cease. * Lights are to be turned off as soon as possible after the completion of the last game. * Citizens Patrol and/or Sheriff Reserves will be requested to be in attendance at all games. 1 `~~ ~i a .. . _ g ~I _~ T ~ ~ 0 3 ~ J ^ r r H 2 ~ __._ _ a 1 p K n ~ 2 0 ~jc 'mow H ~ ~ _ I a n j 9 IE a N N \ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ,. .. ............ O .................................... q W N .. W ' I.. F ~ ~ _ I ~ o V ~ .....................................~............................ ~ W o ~, s l '~ ~ ~ ~ _. .p .4..... _ ................... ~, ~ ~I o ~ e ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~, ~;. ~ W~ ., W ~ L .........._ .,..._ ........... _ _ . ,.. \ A I ~ M P i~3 .~ ~ -b a. ~-- ~ z w ~ ui Z N ~ ~ O t- 'd' ~ _ ~t Z l _O" ~, ~-- Li u.1 m ~ ~ ~ 7 z ls.l ~ N N 0~ y O~ M ~ ~ :~ c^. ~" ~ r. nl u t t t 1 =_ f~ 0 ,.. ,u -- u1 . Q ... N N ~ ~ n ~ I f~ ~ '~ ~ ~N r; ~,- ~ru- Q ~. ~ . d ~ .. M ~ .. ~, -- p 0 ~p 0 ...i! ~ I ~ 1 N~ a ~ w ,~_ o n ~ '°. ao ~ ~ ltt 1. O S Apri110, 1991 Jce Schultz City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Director 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Deaz Mr. Scbultz: 7Lank you, again, for your invitation to participate in a meeting with yourself, oae of my neighbors, and two officials representing Citrus Little Le e. However. ~~ ! :;,-'nu,cd to you during our phone wtrversahon, I feel that t..:!; a ;,,cc~ung would be pointless as far as resolving anv n"+,tit._ ,c,uinng from the inconsistent management of Redhill Cuuunumty Park. Y see no need for an exchange of dialog between neighbors and park aSerS. As to your suggestion that the home phone numbers of Litte League officials be circulated throughout our neighborhood, it is not normally the custom, when a law is being violated, for the vtctirrt to call on the perpetrator for help! We neighbors expert the GY'ty of Rancho Cucamonga [o effectively exert control over the groups or individuals to whom permission to use the park has been granted. For you to wrongfully place the responsibility for managing this park on us, by telling us to roll Little League officials, is ludicrous! It would make more sense to pubhsh the home phone numbers of [be Mayor, Council Members, City Managers, and Community Services officials, whose responsibility it is to managge this park. In addition, the prospeM of writing a "memorandum of understandings" between the neighbors and the park users is absurd. The City _~ ordinances and policies concerning the enforcement of curfews and the use of amplification in city parks. These cleazly should be sufficient! Your admission that "occasional" monitoring of the Little League P.A system may occur, and that a piece of tape may be placed on their volume dial is clearly not consistent with the wording of the City's amplification polity. Monitoring is to he constant while amplification is in use, and appropnate fees for this monitoring are to be paid. As you pointed out at the Ctty Council meeting on Apri! 3rd, the Ctty is the landlord, ti,e Little League is the tenant. With this thought in mmd, my neighbors and I are requesting that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and vnthout discrimination or ~xcGp~s enforce all ordinances and policies concenilng curfews and amplification use in Redbill Community Park. Sincerely, c~~~o`~ art.__~ Ma Johnson cc: Dennis Stout Diane Williams William Alexander Pam Wright Charles Auquet Jack Lam ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE; TO: FROM: BY: 3UB7F!`T April 17, 1991 Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director e~3 . Tarry L. Smith, Superintendent of Park Planning and Development 77d "neciud[+ ISSN CONS DER;TTONS a paAa*nm`an BX TEE P nR RKCRpaTTON COMMrSSION COMMENDATION That City Council, consider the skateboard program recommendations as presented 6y the Park and Recreation Commission concerning skateboard facilities. BACKGROUND In May, 1990, the City Council directed the Park and Recreation Commission and staff to study the issue of skateboarding and skateboard facilitiss and to report back to the council with their findings. Much of the staff time allocated to this issue over the last eleven months was spent in researching insurance guidelines a.^.3 c ntacting other cities regarding their experience with this activity. In May, 1990, staff received a copy of a letter sent to the City of Rialto expressing California Municipal Insurance Authority's stand on the skateboard issue. CMIA (the City's carrier) stated that the Board of Directors would more than likely exclude skateboarding from coverage by the insurance pool. This letter indicated that a City interested in providing a skateboard facility would probably have to ae1P- insure this activity outside of CMIA. The Park and Recreation Commission has stated several times that skateboarding should be treated as any other recreational activity sponsored by the City and that a safe and controlled environment shoul3 be provided for those participants. The Commission feels that this activity is not a fad and that user demand will not decline in the near future. Thus, staff continued to research possibilities in hope of finding some way to make the skateboarding program a r~~ CITY COUNCrL• MEETINf. aitA'T'E&OARDING ISSUE April 17, 1991 Page z During the Pall oP 1990, the skateboard issue was da-emphasized because of a lack of positive indicators from staff research at that time. In December, 1990 the Community Services Department received a copy of a second letter Prom CMIA to the City of Rialto which presented a somewhat more receptive outlook Por skateboarding under very epeoific conditions. CMIA indicated they would consider ekateboarA facilities fnr ,....,er+~- •~ ~;,; :."u uaaic programs. 1. Facilities that era owned and operated by the private seotor or on a contract to the private sector. 2. city owned and operated facilities which are deemed to be of "low hazard". CMIA defined "low hazard" as follows: Snake runs with gentle slopes and curves Miscellaneous concrete curbs and elevated platlarme approximately one Poot high. Concrete curved slopes not higher than three Peet. Large cement bowls. Based on the letter from CMIA received in December, 1990, the Park and Recreation Commission reactivated the skateboard issue. Through renewed research and working with CMIA; staff, in March, 1991, presented a plan to the Park and Recreation Commission for their consideration. Based on that recommendation, and the discussion that followed, the Park and Recreation Commission is forwarding the following items Por consideration by the City Council. A. That a location be studied that could be put aside for the purpose oP a public low hazard skateboard facility. B. That standards be studied and reviewed by CMIA, experts in the field, and local skateboard enthusiasts for "low hazard" designs that would be acceptable to all concerns. c. That safety guidelines, rules, standards and supervision issues be explored that are acceptable to CMIA and the city of Rancho Cucamonga and it's Commissions. I ~ ! CI+^_$ 1`S7QPICT_*_. 1+.-°ETi;:G SKATEBOARDING ISSUE CONSIDERATIONS April 17, 1991 Page 3 D. Finally that a "Citizens Task Force" ba formed that would include Community Services StaPt, Park and Recreation Commission members, Public Safety commission members, the general public and skateboarfl participants, Eor the purpose of studying the above issues and be responsible to bring back Eindings and recommendations for consideration. JS/TIS/dak '~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STIt,F~' REgOR~ DATE: April 17, 1991 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, Ctfy Engineer 8Y: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Ledig House a~3 . Pursuant to City Council's request, the following additional background information regarding the Ledig House 15 being provided. Ffrst, it should be noted that the moving of the house is of little benefit to the developer. Selling the lot will benefit the developer but constructing Nilson Avenue between the tract boundary and Amethyst Avenue will probably result to additional outstanding costs to the developer. Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-254, item 6, (copy attached) provides that the extension of Nilson Avenue is contingent upon Ctty Council's approval of reimbursement to the developer. City Council Resolution No. 90-077 (copy attached) approves the reimbursement. Improvement of the extension of Nilson Avenue did not include disposal of the on-site improvements and existing house. It was understood that the City would provide clear right-mf-way for the construction of the street improvements. The developer has already expressed to staff that due to the current new home sales activity that they would prefer not to construct the extension of Nilson or the extension of the Master Plan Storm Drain (see Item 5 of the attached copy of Planning Comm ssion Resol uti en No. 88-254). Because the storm drain alignment is north of the house, the developer was instructed to begin construction which is now underway. Staff asked the developer to participate in a ,ioint venture with the City to move, restore and sell the house. The developer indicates that they have no interest in a Point venture. They were also asked to consider a subordinate type arrangement where the developer would be paid for the tat out of escrow of the sale of the completed restoration of the house. Again, the developer indicated no interest. The developer did indicated that they would consider carrying a first trust on the lot which they provided a confirming letter (copy attached). The City purchased the property to October/November of 1987 for the sum of f240,000 plus closing costs, approximately 5250,000 total cost. Two appraisals were completed at that time, and it was determined Lhat eminent domain proceedings would not result in any savings and overall cost could increase. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LECIG NOUSE ,",PRiL i7, ligl PAGE 2 In March of 1488, an appraisal was made to determine the value of the structure only (copy of summary attached). The structure was appraised at f170,000. Therefore, the cost of the land including closing costs was approximately 160,000. The following preservation costs have been incurred to date: Cost of appraisal of structure and engineers f 3,000 estimate for relocation aM restoration Cost or preparing orlginat Did documents for relocation and restoration and negotiations, acquiring proposals, estimates for utilities, etc. t0 date (All Lhe above performed by Engineering staff. It does not include other division staff time which 15 minimal except for Community Services. Comnunlty Services cost, which includes structural reports, was provided in a separate report.) Cost of maintenance, upkeep and gardeningg, Engineering/Maintenance staff, utilities, and materials Administrative Services/Custodian staff and materials (re-keying b repair of locks) Taxes Insurance G.T.E. nonrefundable deposit for determining telephone line raising and lowering estimate for house move Purchase of house Purchase of property Subtotal f170,000 80.000 Total I Sc~ f 7,000 E 13,800 f zoo None (Exempt) Included 1n City's overall poi icy. No additional premium. f 500 f 24,500 f250,000 5274,500 CITY COUNCIL STAR REPORT LED1G HOUSE APRIL i?, ,991 PAGE 3 Proposed cost for moving the house to lot 11 Tract 13930 and restoring 1t is as follows: House move Cleaning of site Removal of trees Preparation of plans Construction Cost of lot f 30,000 S 3,000 f 2,OD0 s r~,mn f110,000 S141,000 Totat f301,000 GRAND TOTAL 5575,500 Attached is a copy of Lhe property description taken from the structure appraisal that was included 1n the original bid docuaents. Ai so attached are revised floor plans showing the original floor plan when the house was built in the early 1900's. The dormers that are not shown on the floor plans were not a part of the original house. It is not known when the living room, dormers, kitchen, bath, breakfast area, basement, Dorch and fireplace fn den and possibly the other fireplace were added. The two westerly bedrooms, laundry, bath, recreation and storage rooms were added within the past five years and are ncL completely finished. Although of no significance with regard to historical value, structurally, the house was originally an approximately 1500 square foot two bedroom carriage type Sears kit house. Respectfully submi~t~2'k/d/q~,~y`-'~~~~ NJO:MP:sd \`~ Attachments ~S~ PLANNING COMMISS RESOLUTION N0. 38-254 TT 13930 - W{NBR~,,,: OE VELOPMENT January 11, 1989 Page 3 side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the opposite side of the street from future developn~e nt (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. Sidewalks shall be constructed an one side of the following streets: a. North side of Wilson Avenue, b. West side of Hillside Cove, and .. Sv~L„ >IJe ui "n° Siree u. 3. The parkway landscaping and trait fence on Wilson Avenue shall be designed to provide a 5D mph sight distance at the intersections as approved by the City Engineer. 4. The lots on the north side of Wilson Avenue shall be drained by individual yard drain parkway culvert systems discharging into Wilson Avenue. 5. Install the missing portions of city Master Plan Storm Drain Line 3-E within Wilson Avenue from Amethyst Avenue to Alta Loma Channel to the east including sufficient catch basin capacity at the Pmethyst/Wilson intersection as justified by a final drainage study approved by the City Engineer. The Lost of the facility shall be eligible for fee credits and reimbursements in accordance with the City Storm Drain Master Plan policy. 5. Nilson Avenue off-site improvements: a. Construct full width street improvements including parkways from the project to Pme thyst Avenue. b. Reconstruct the Amethyst/Wilson Avenue intersection to include but not limited to: (1) Curb returns on the west side, (2) Removal of the cross gutter on the east side including curb return replacement as necessary, and (3) Reconstrution of the pavement as necessary. c. These improvements are eligible for fee credit and reimbursement from the City systems development fund if approved by the City Council. If not approved by the City Council, this entire condition shall be waived. / 5~-- RESOLU ii Oti ii0. 90-0%! A RES OLU TlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO C UC AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIfIG THE SU PPLEhIENT FOR THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 1MPROVEM ERT AGREEIA ENT OF TRACT N0. 13930 WHEREAS, the Tentative flap of Tract fio. 13930, consisting of 23 lots, submitted by Winbrook Development, Inc., Subdivider, located on Wilson Rve nue between Hellman Avenue and Pme Lhy st Street, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 6y said Subdivider and has been approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Rct of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 26 of ca iw r;r ~• ,,.n WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to app royal of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement Supplement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement Supplement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and Z. That said Improvement Agreement Supplement is accepted as being an addendum to the previously approved and executed agreement, dated November 1, 1989, subject to approval of said Supplement as tc form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3, chat System Oev elopme nt fees be used for reimburse- ments of the off-site improvements for Wilson Avenue between the easterly tract boundary and Amethyst Street be and the same is approved, subject to approval as to procedure, fo rim and content thereof by the City Attorney. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of February, 1990. AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright NOES: None ABSENT: None +/~^J,I '~/ ~1 ~~~ enn,s tout, ~»or ~ 5~ March 30, 1990 Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Monty Presser Engineering Department Reference: Tract Na. 13930 D `~' ~t ~ ~ gin, ;,. :,; >;: ~~ Dear Morey; This ktrer is ro confirm our conversarion in which we ducarsed the Ciry's possible purchase of Lm No. Il in the above referenced Hoer. The purpose for purchasing this lot would be to relocate the existing historical Landmark (the Ledig home) on the lot. In our conversation I Indicated that wti might be interested in carrying a first trust deed on the lot to assist the Ciry in their cash flaw problems. This would be subject to obtaining approvals from all parties involved (investors, lenders, etc ...). The semis of the trust deed could be on the fallowing basis: Downpayment (Estimated) 30'% Loan Term 3 Years Amonized IS Years (Due in 3 Years) Sales Price As previously stated If the Ciry would find these terms acceptable, it would be necessary to obtain approvals from all necessary parties and we could then move ahead to a prompt closing. Sincerely, QUINTESSEN~CE`DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Ja fin `~'-~ L `~" I. LrTRODL'CTIOY SU'1L'1L4RY OF SALIEh"T DATA Veaeina: City of Rancho Cucamonga Location: b702 Amethyst Street at Wilson Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Assessor Parcel No.: 1062-071-08 Legal Description Please see Grant Deed in Addenda ~+rea of vwveranip: .58 acres or 25,080 square feet Street Acoess: Amethyst Street and Wilson Avenue Utilities Electzidty to the subject property is provided by Southern California Edison Company end ass by Southern California Gas Company. Telephone service is provided by General Telaphoaa Company. Cucamonga County Water District provides wabr and billing for ewer service which is provided by Chino Basin Water Distrito. ToP~P1U^ Somewhat level, draining northeast to southwest Improvements 3,300 square foot 2•atory wood frame, wood aided home with 4 bedrooms and 2-3/4 bathrooms, 2 fireplaces, built is 11918. Zor:ing: ~2 • Very Low Residential with 2 density units par acre Present Use: Single Family Residential ffighest ~ Beat Uasa Siagls Family Residential Summary of Estimatsd Vahaaa as otMarch 1,1988: Estimated value of aristina improvements: 3 170,000.00 Estimated cost W move the house: $30,000,00 to 3{0,000.00 Estimated coat to restor lot to a safe rnndition: 3 15.000.00 Estimated coat to restore houw 3 80,000,00 0288.347 ~S~ J - 5 PAGFERTY DESCI't~1TON SITE ANALl'319 Vestin` laatlm City of Rancho Cucamon8a, a Municipal Corpo»tioa 5702 Amethgat Street at Wilson Awnw in the City of Rancho Cucamon8a, San Bernardino County, California ._._ ~.~ r~[q~ iiumpar 1 0 821171 08 l.a~al I)aa~aiptiost Please see Grant Deed is Addenda Arn of Ow~nldp .58 mo» m leas aerw (88'X286' .26,080 square Get) SheatAn+eas UtWtiaa Topo~aplp Amethyst which is 2 laoa uphalt paved, curbs and eutten a» in place Electridty to the subject p»perty is provided by Southern California Edison Company and has by Southern California Gu Company. Telephow sarvia ie provided by Genera( Telephone Company. Cucamonga County Water District provide water and ~llin8 for rawer serviw which is p»vided by Chino Baia Water District Property is mostly level and draiain8 aorthaut w southwest Improvement The Property is improved with • two awry Victorian era. Farm Style home built is 31918. T'ha foliowin~ Improvement Schematic and Improvement Sehadula describe the subject is detail. 028-aq7 ' S~ 23 - ~ RGPl3t'EY DESCRiPI70~ L4LPROVE'4!E*1T 9CSE4lATIC FIR9P FLOOR Bedroom r..llnary Badraom ~I s '. Buil4in eeun4n, book "" eaaaa, buamant, ats. Room outline Out aide wall at Houaa and dividing original atraetura from addition G+:liii/ _~__.... ® nr.yloaa ® Wood D«kin~ sc.+tE 1•.io~ Clo ~• QupUO~ lbr 1 L : : h = Blactrkal ~gWpmaat -~ 3I1 nakfuti ~--• Arar 1-° I4tehan ~ ~ ~_ 1 , l%a % I _ ~-~ 1, t(::y.r, 1 r' S. ~ 1 Faotry i W 1 1 1 ' et Bar Dan ~ Steal i _ t r•-~~~ leading ~:` ......1 Toyer down tO i 'i 4;Y ~~ Boes ~ Baaament ; ` ' . . : ~ ~ ,....: i qty"L" , 1 .StaPaa , ty. Z IS ~ t ~ ` ~ : L :: R^ i 41 YV.V.V V. L:4~r:: 4 ~Y:i:~ ' ~.IYlnt BOOR ? {;4 ti `Ti v± 028&347 I !~ ~ 24 J- lt; PROPERTY DESCRIPTTOY lbtPROVF.~VT SC8EMAITC S~COHID FILIOit i 1 1 , t i ~ a ~ ~ ae ~~ ~~ i5g -~a Lege ®uiltin tountan, boot ~~••~ cW~, b1AmH1L, etc. o 8000 OYL~IIN Ou! dd~ wll M V...__ PRDPF.It'TY DESCftIPi70N I11iPROVEMFaTI' SCFimI)I.E 12a~CGIItiGn • 13.300 sQua» fook 70 to 80 year old »sidena (9Ta pua» feet being an addition built within the put two yaan) witlf a total of four bedrooms (one having 17.5' builbin kaoety pine book case, chow cabinet, counter Wp and cupboards with knotty pima paneling on walls end ceiling), drusing »oms off hvo of the bedrooms; two tad thrsa- quarter bathrooms; kitchen with double sink, garbage disporal, diahwuhsr, canmic the counter tops, tad nasud fluornant lighting; S' : 9' knotty pins paneled (walls and ceiling) wet bar with built-in stainltu still sink, frtuer, sad shelves; 287 puan foot den with stone tnd brick flnolaet leeran,in Ht. ti....w .-~ _+ ^ ~„o:). knotty Pine paneling (walls sad ailing) with built-ie book asea on all walls, built•ia cupboard (floor to ailing), and two larp leaded stained glass windows; 12' : 20' dining room with flnplaa (see description about); S.a' :10' divided pantry ona with built•in china cabinet (floor to ceiling); 11' : 30' ncrestioa room with drop stair emu from bows and unfinished stonge •nu under eavu; laundry room; and foyer. Forced air heating with floor vmq, Lwo waLL huten, central air eonditioniag W addition, two window air conditlonen. Covet + ion - 1' t0 &1/2' raised ooncnN blor3c feundatlen (tdditioa), concrete, and concrete and rock foundation with crawl apace, composition shingL roof, wood siding ezterior with wood trim and wood ti-ame windows. Iabrior floo» era hardwood under vinyl Lila in kitchen (190 p. R.) and lull bath (a2.6 eq.R) upsttdn. The living room, dining room, den, 3/a bath, upstairs hall and dossing room in the original house a» carpet over hardwood with the »maining rooms having esposed hardwood floors. The addition is tU carpeud a:apt for vinyl Lila is the lbll bath and laundry room. The reerution room hts the carpeting in plan but it is not installed. Interior walls an drywall (addition) and plater (original). Wallpaper in statrwall and 3/4 bathroom (1/R with wood paneling below). Wood shah ceiling in 3/a 6athroam. Ceramic tiie tub and shower eaclosuna, CCnditiQn - Good is additlon (sot ampleGly flaiahed, needs paint on mouldings; c1oNt door in ona bedroom). Avenge to Gcod is original house. Soma water damage visible in ailing of 3/a bathraam, a. Descriotiee .288 square foot "L" shaped covered porch with two wood built-in storrg~ elose4 (ona on each side of chimney) with a small saeened in section; 374 aquae fief of GOnQate sbpa with wood gate. C'.en_•Ln~Mion .Wood ailing, cement floor, Seld stone 9" wide and 1.1/2' high (outside height is t5') wall along outside edge of porch with Held atone and wood columns ~9J1di110II • Aversge 0?~88-347 ~ ~ / 26 ~-iy Pl'tt?P£R2Y DFtSi~l IINP1tOVFd1~Tf 3Clr}Ep17f.E b. De^crintien .30.5' : 12.b' wood deck, cownd and enclosed oa three Hides (1st floor, pert of new addition) with doubb french door entry to houw and three wood saps with 54 square foot aacreb foundation. t'on.tructlon- Wood and Concrete lr.GIId1110G -Good c. Deecriotien .321' = 10' wood deck (2nd floor) with 319 lineal foot bnlustrads and 9.6' z A' ^t....t,.~..:...~ _ rails. -- ~- --- ^. ca..t~ ;....... wiin nand ron.tru!++nn - Wppd ~OIIdi119G • Averap 1. De^crintion - 10' : 14' HaMmeat with outside entrance, laundry hookups, sad lltrnaa ren^trnr{inn (',e~~u QaOr concnb block walls and uphalt rile ceilint (damsaed) S'.uOdiE19II -Fair 028&.847 ~ ~ O ~ J-ci PROPERTY DESCRlPTTU\' L1SI'AOVE7dE7.T .NATTC 5DC0,~]D F'i.00R r- --- i ' Out cd~ rall of Hou>. ~~ end avtmn~ anPne! rtructun) from ~dd~tion Conmu ® Finpl~e~ ® Woad D~ckin~ SCALE 1" .10' ~~~ Builbin countm, book. cun, bWm~n4 etc. Rnom oudin~ C_!J April 10, 1991 Joe Schultz City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Director 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Dear Mr. Schultz: Thank you, again, for your invitation to oarticioate in a meetinv vrirh vnnrcP~f, ~..a ~!' u~y ucigLOOrs, ano two omaals representing Citrus little I.ea~ue. I-~owevei, as I explained to you during our phone cometsauon, I feel that such a meeting would be pointless as far as resolving any yroblems resulting from the inconsistent management of Redbill Community Park. I see no need for an exchange of dialogue between neighbors and park users. As to your suggestion that the home phone numbers of Little League officials be circulated throughout our neighborhood, it is not normally the custom, when a law is being violated, for the victim to call on the perpetrator for helps We neighbors erect the City of Rancho Cucamonga to effectively exert control over the groups or ind[vrduals to whom permission to use the park has been granted. For qou to wrongfully place the res onsibiliryry for managing this park on us, by telling us to call Little League officials, is lud~crous! It would make more sense to ublish [he home phone numbers of the Mayor, Council Members, City Managers, and Community Services officials, whose responsibility it is to managge this park. In addthon, the prospect of writing a "memorandum of understanding" between the neighbors and the park users is absurd. The City Jta~ ordinances and policies concerning the enforcement of curfews and the use of amplification in city parks. These clearly should be sufficient! Your admission that "occasional" monitoring of the la[tle League P.A, system may occur, and that a piece of taps may be placed on their volume dial is clearly not consistent with the wording of the City's amplification policy. Monitoring is to be constant while amplification is in use, and appropriate fees for this monitoring aze to he Paid. As you pointed out at the City Council meeting on April 3rd, the Ctry is the landlord, the Little League is the tenant. With this though[ in mind, my neighbors and 1 are requesting that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and w[thoutdiscrimination or ~x~~~[~n, enforce all ordinances and policies concerninv ~~rfews and amplification use in Redhill Community Pazk. Seely, // Marva hnson ce: Dennis Stout Diane Williams William Alexander Pam Wn'pJtt Charles uquet Jack Lam NEIGHBORHOOD PE7T170N .~ c .~ L C ~ ~ a 'll _v ~, v~ We, the neighbors of Redhill Community Park, demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exception, enforce all ordinances and policies concerning curfews and amplification use in Redlilll Community Park. ~ ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER i..~.:,...a~ ~..r.._....y 3 zSdS X79 ~'~~.c-..~ Ce..e~~ ~~'f-39ad ~ ~~~1 ` ~Iwvvc>, i;~~~r 1~~ ~~o b,~ ~ ~~n~mnp2~.~'"~' 81`1 Cal~mA C~- 9~7-~~s5 NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION We, the neighbors of Redbill Community Pazk, demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exception, enforce all ordinances and policies concerning curfews and amplification use in Redhill Community Park. NAhfE ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ~..r......,..~ -~:~-~~ ~c(~Ll~r~'C "13b5 U(NEUA~9 gggrssv jeN~NU, Sc l ~~ ~`r Z~ib~ Ut Nf- ~y~20 4~ hll~oR l~ mUaPN~I `l~~a RATE s-F gR°tl'195 %=1yn Itit i / o-v`flc'~ 7 3 S % ] i5c~l~ ~ t1 b'!-oreCXp15 /l~~l~ mom - ,~~l.e 7 3~~g~e Sri- ~~ -, . ~ ,~ -, _ ~~ , ~~ti ~J/~~onJ ~~133 ~:/2~~UUir~ 5' 9~'~/-3YoFr ~ n ~~,"`'ot-9~.~V Ulr (X-0'SY1. ~ a ~3 ~ ~-on w ~ d ,) {- ~C ~ q - 3 Ny 8 NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION We, the neighbors of RedhiU Community Park, demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exceptipn, enforce all ordinances and policies concerning curfews and amplifiption use in Redhill Community Park. N~1A..LE ADDRF.CS PHONE NUMBER ~upuuaeij ~.fp-rv6~' ~ /1t27 ~+2e.-~ ~,f.7~~1 ~~~~?i' ~.~DZ° ~'.. n / PE77770N We, the neighbors of Redhill Community Park, demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exception, enforce all ordinances and policies concerning curfews and ampliScation use in Redhill Community Park. tuyuvuw~ .c(1~f.% .t„ ~- ^~ /~ / ~ ~ 9~ais3~ ~,j ~, ~_ /' GIJ G / ~ /7l~ / ~~ .~; ~ ~F- ~ i n 7?~3 ~ K ~r a~ ~UA ~r ~ ~ ~ NEIGHBORHOOD PETTCION We, the neighbors of Redhill Community Park, demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exception, enforce all ordinances dancepolicies concerning curfews and amplification use in Redhill Community Park. NBME ADBRFSC pHr~R / ~op~ionat~ ~Oi -I~0/l/ILJ;~I,I i Pun ~i,/.. ~~/ -~r-~ ~i ~, a 7~0 ~/fu,~'c~~ y87-srss lC,~l~.~r-~-~Jc~P-~f- X~~~ !~-r~.~~..s~. 9vy_o9i2 NEIGHBORHOOD PE1TI'ION We, the neighbors of Redhill Community Park demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exception, enforce all ordinances and policies concerning curfews and amplification use in Redhill Community Park. NAT1~ ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ~_r__~, 26/ l .J.~Or.~ ~DY~Pn~'pavy. ~~ ~~~ NEIGHBORHOOD PE'ITI70N We, the neighbors of Redhill Community Park, demand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga consistently, and without discrimination or exception, enforce all ordinances and policies concerning curfews and amplifiretion use w Redhill Community Park. N9ME ADDRESS p}jONE NUMBER i~...:..~ai~ • J~-ea~'t ~v~.c~'1~ ~""' a 3 3 ~~ ~ih~~ N"' Y ~ ~~ -kh,c, ~ ~, ~1- ~~ ,, new rw-Kai. ~ ~~, • -~- ~~~~ Q~ a,r_.~ olarv~ .~ ~~- 66 ~.+u6 X~.~e~T , got n~fy-`~~l,E1 ~ d./1,~.~ ~ 4A c~t2~1 .~~~~ ~, q ° r ~,~,r. ;,,~~,L~Tn ~~! ~q ~33 ~ce~1- -.~~" ~ .t~..ca.mcr' ~-q ft 9~13~ 0 .'~; ~h(I T5Y~~~!'~'"2 ~/ N APR 16 1991 ...,, ~. ~ 3-iy-9/ Qom- ~' Q.~o'C~a-~,~C ~ eli~('~tti~ . ~~(e_t ~~ tie, G~caha, ~Yn-c-~~ eif.,.~e~J ~.Faut. ,~ --Qi . ~ _j ~" /Y~-L/~, ~~LCt-C~-F~ G72 LK' !.~-l~n.GL~~°t~'-.7.~ , ~~' Y .J C~ fah ~~ C,tu.h~,,~ ~-~:.d, ,U~Yi.ar-U.e~ GZ.'YYt~C-CtE ~iYLiCCJ ~'~~N~i ~..~lc-C-c~.C~--E~(it_p~ ~ ~,CCQ/,.i Q~4.7rLO ~ G2~~ C+t~,'L/r~c~la.sL~ ,c~~,e~LQ.O ~yr~.CC.O~GJ ~`~-i'Y~'t ~~~ ~ ~-i~'a7nco QGLO~ (~~-CAF. • .~ [.vd+.~P-t~~ ,mu~c~- ~,at~ie ~G, ~~~ ~~ -f,~~reR,~e,4.~:~u a~,.d~., /h Ei,a-2. ~ Bm K cGCU Gt.ir~-c~. - i K e c h. ~~ .~kn ~-~x~-vt~u~. /~az~ , eF~o--rte, ~r--, (.a~:~~(C,4, . y ~~~• ~~l~~r-peg ~~e~~J c~ ~---(a~~ . ~Il-GL.'i~. ~ ~~ r~-+r~-~ [.fin-``L~, L~6-,Y~-c. ~~ Cruel `-r`-i-... ~~~LL`c~- :~'l2GCf- ~0'C~'9L,~~ CL~~-~c~.__fl-l :. ~~~c°Zt~LC- CL~^..~~~u ~r.~Ltl~~;' 1~~- -f-~rc »~ -..... - --- C CI~'i~li _ i:}~0 ~n~ ~c/!~-L!._. G°f CCLC.L. Vg7L. ~ ~~ _I '~ Ll. ~!_L. ;,~'1~-r~!LC.. ,~'=C.IL~.') ~/L4-~L~I~L'.(.~)~Z.t, .C~7-~ , E-'zL~~:ti>u~e<L CLGLti~tic-~~~z.~, ~n~~f~~,,,;~~e-~~ , ~~C.~[91~ ~tGL4,t,~ ~U G<,~-1(,'~" ~-~-C-~4:.rY'~e.(.l~'%zL°cs}.:~ • htr, m. ~L.2 ~ u,'-~ o rn'~-~zC~ ~ ti-C /h-a-t, u~.: ~ Z~ct f.'_~. ~.~.,.. _!C ~~..i ..'~, prat. u", ~ ~ ~ - . . JJ , C~ "_ Fr ~. t- !,~ ~ „ `r6 ,~_^c -~ L.~ .cam. CIF.: 'f~-<,.~ ' ~ L1:r~~,t~ t ' ~ .L~/l-(~.%ILC. ~-A.-fC, .. [./Ll~.~~n LB' FLT l(Lf'a~,G(_~~ (~Il Z.y I /.J ~ '."yC-~i.i. '~- 1"'~`~~"L LG~~a.- ~-7J1.x'k-yyL Y~C.7 GL r fH2 f' ~ vrtG. ~.~~ ~ ~o~~ Ci-C~i}tic.V ,(~t;~Cl %~CJ ,' ~2!1/~. U.IL., .CC,~r,~ !~-tc,~.C-~,. ?=%~x-CF.%"r~-'1~.~ ~C ~rL~e~, ~/ ~~~i~.Yl~'..L•A~ ,~~r'-t %'a~4 r (~J~c.d.~, C~r;~y._e_~'.cc~~~ r_ 1,e!~J ~'U LCF, CL (c-G ~" ~ ~r"/C`~. Gl.~t'--lC• ;,'y~i,6{..ll, ,~1~-~~"6-ct~C'A. , cv~cc'-R- <:1.a-en ~t.: tioa~r,..e., ~ LL~iif C~- ~L/~ ~ ~LC/hl.C.9 ~ ~~L%:Cn , C'-a.hru-Li-~-Z<~ ~-~-Cti'4./~•~ .G ll'f!~O ~4C ~'t- ~!~4 ~{1'~~'l,C~~?e~G-e~-C-L`/!-,,B~riA~ ~'.~-Lf~ , l,~Qi}iY LL~`tLf 7 ~ ~-CL~ • ~ l.l~ (/t,IC~~-~y-C.C. r ~C Q c~n~ CEO-Q-E.. LZ ~ih,~~'.L; nl ~~ Lit~LtG~V ~l~'Y.CG~G ~°~L. ~G L`f~GthT __,~ ~°'/t~ ~ ~f-f.G~~ . C~~C tk-e/ ,O~~~ee~ ~ ~j~'~ ,02G~G~r~~ ~-~a-cep. ~fi ,~ ~ ~ -ym~J -w irn.~_ ~.~Z r ~t ti ~ti nna_c'L !L~~~I ~~~. LLC(,GC"-L.4~.~ ~G//-~~a' G~jl; c2 f" K/+~ M1~ ~~~ .~.-r:.~"~~l !LI).f111`il 6As~i~.') •~ .m .,~ -fKG .,.__ elf. ._,. G~ _ ____ , ~,.. .~_ _ . __ y~ rv~G 4: c~- ~ ~ L4 J ~.v-d-~c~Cel. ~ ~~y. l ~'l.d'i.l_ ~."~' ~. L.L'm~/Yh-GV7LL~L~ .~~ i/tcc.LC~Cti.~ ~~ -tip "~~~~. ~.~~~ /rim~. ~jz~,/,u~-~Q..n ;`~,6titJ , .~,?tC~G42~G~i'~ ~Gih«J~ -c,Fdlrt~ ~-tt~-~; /~~Jtm~3~tL}}~7~. Q.,~~ ~~//c11.t ~~c~~~a``~~r~t~ &fzV • ,(/,c m,1,~~" T-~ Q~`LGi11.~CL.'J ~ /(_,~GC. f-~t. L.Q. ~.L,'~-C t.GC.~.~C gcey -i:.K-e_, ~~~[ ~a-~Q- ~~'L2~rrt,a . /~ ~,~, g,o ,Q ~l~n~n 4 ~'YL6 ,~-/. yl.t~^ ~ ~CG'Y~- ~ /YY~,:'Z~-c -94~ ,.Ltl L~``~ Ca t,GtiE.,} G°~ L~-Ct.~ lYl~(IJL~ ~ L~,~/l3~" ~iLC,~ ~°L'n-~e"4L~CK-i ~YW y~ (,gym .~1 ~~sc~,~, d-'~,JL~c~C. ? na; . 1 n _i P i O -!f . Lt"U t CJK-eLt" . ~3GL5-,E' ~ t-l~-Q }~G~yt.ct , Clh 2Q.o . - t .vr~Ecc~f~~l ,~~iJ c2t t.CQt- ~cu,~: -. - -- ~~c.4.c_ a/>.e_ ~lon ,ma~.,/c~, {2t~'.~~ .cam ~ ~r~.ll~,___ (YCC4:titaC, "tf~tr~i ~ri,Gt.Ue .~Ya~-C~R~t~-~u ~ Q~c~, ~/ ~ , lr-c~CtiL ,~ ~ r~u lL~ A.C-n: t,a r3 ~-rr~~hi xd - ;E,ic~- Yr'L_~ -ld ~~ ;~br n.e t3'n.~ Luc2cf~ ~,-t~ -. C. i~ ~~ZS.r ~~ ~,/~ 'J ~Cf' ~-LI,I'G"L~ d1 r~,*-L,' ~~~.CL.f" ~~~.%2M~L.[.C~~+ CI-F. ~ q i /- ` ~ v ~~E(.(..C-t. Cl:~t~lC- trE-C., .~CW.L,C.e.Q .~~. .~-E-4~' f'.Ct~//'~.I':?~ ~ ti4 ~ 4 ~', ,G/.;S' ~~Qh.'?y'.sC-S-C . ~LPtr, y~'~. tCt..*..~# . . ._Ll. /_~~ '~.~~C Ley ~(/ vZ,yi~ -~A.-04-~. j~~d~f. L!+-/~-~ C~.Pyi~'-E, / ,, `~%I `~~ C! CLyi ~ t-~l,i. 744000 , ~j-C,4.Q.: C~f , _C•v-,~ ~% rvL ~-t..CcL ti C C.- C,b gib !~-1.C, ~ LUL 7~J~" - !t t ! I« :, .. .iC ~~L~~.. Cccw .v`La.~ ~GQ.Li~-~,~!~~/a~., C~~o 'L~i;'~l i.,: +~~~.: ~. 1~.~~ ~'~?, nQ~:,!!, Ui rrC. iiJ ~ -~*(`~-'LS. ~'O:~:a'~ ;r --ff-- S ~~ ,~L~,-C.em-rrc~,~ceM-cam ~~, 4u.k~- ~~ c+~~-e~- _i-A n„ 1,14, C ~ (.t ~ e~- ~ ' ~(dJ~~ i ~Q~it- -~ ; mit ah .. a.~j~.CE. ~~~~-C.~ e1G4/tiC-~Yt..C.C-~i .~Yn2~r>~.1~-C~4.0 ~~~~.~G,~ ~L~G~ ,~1!t,r~. (.~.rc .~7A~rn/-2, ,~ `y~~~ ~YL6-'f~~ ./T1'~Ct~~C_. . (,C.''C~, ~1.E.C~ ~` 1'U /~..P CB)1.d(R.Qi~iJ -SJ~L~ i ~.¢.5/h<~ li~.~C • C~-Q.~/~ ~2.~ ~7,LCe'~J L~ Bra 4~ r C~"Yh-i/nA~v~~c~ ~ ~ ~~' 1AnJ C.~(t-CG~ir/r~i B-r~-~-A . .Cf~ _L!U-CJL ~4.9LU-L)coy Gk~~~t~ ~K.~O Q X-a-~iCU- ~1.ic'-C.-~!fi~(~' ~`yp'"~J (~L-ZcBx.' ~ Of~~-e-uL~.c~ Gee LC, ~YhA,124~L Cl/~n-C.2-i~v N~_ 9CCt' ~.~Zty ft~~GCGQ~~ ~CLc% "t,4. h4d--~ ~~,~-v icy. E'z~. ~tcC~e ~a~,./~r -~ ,gym-6~i,~, cu-~~r ~.~n,.u e,(.~l~L~,~.~J ati.e. ' CL~~.~~. ~~~-t~,~.-/- f~2,p u-4,e_ at~.~, , Q~uC n"'^-~'~-' ~-IZ-f,c~alkLn~ ~•~~ ~~ (U e_ L~vualCc~ C~/-c.t~ tK~m~ ~~ .-.C~ ~~4,,~. l(~e-~,L~~ ~1 fie. a~C~, ?,{~~ {~~, a,;~ Ce~e~L ate--(-,~.e_ d-~7erh.~ d~w,~'~...," ,:L'~ Cz-~ti- Qc~+-~c~cWo Ct-m~1_. ~2a.c~- a,4FQ,Q Q f ~-e~ ,~L `~`~,C~ ' .~ C~t+-r~ ~ l~~tt.s-rte ), i ~ • _._ . !/$G ~e.. 1;~,~-~Q! ~c -eel. ~~ . .... .. /~~~ h~~ _ .~~~'~-F.. c~/~,.~. PAY„,~,~,, , ~n~"o ~1i')Y,bt~J _ tQQt ~ Qirvi /Yt a-~ cz.Q; TT v~ . _... __.. .. . - ~ __ .~~ _. _. ...~.a_, CU ,S,9~o ~~ ~.~~. Q ~~ ~ ~- ~ . mad ,orb CaJt~mc~ .~ftrz,o `t- ~ , ~ ~,~.~. ~,~.. ~ ~~~ ~~ a~zd y~a~ ~ ~r~.o~ ~~ orc e-u/+ ,.C,ev, ..~.~X~`,~-e,o, Cas_-f.~r~ ate[ cl ~ ~.o~- g~ Q/e.l'i~;e,tea( ~~a~.~a-<- mum ~nQ%-Q ~(,gX.e-¢~ ~ "Q,2me~er.~, ,~Ju. Cle ayze~ ,~ a~ ox a~ d~ ~ d co,-n~ctv,c-~ .~t-~'~t,t,~9o-2- .~Ze Can Lcl~ l_.~~ea~ ..~Lt. ~ ~..-~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~ . ~~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~,d~ mod, .~-~- iaP. m . , ~ pfl, awe " .A~-~- ~`~.~,-fzo _,!i_r~.u.c ,o-na~Q C~.~~~ arcd .cu-s~.~ .,~.,~ our .man dVL~/uU .~.~.~ --~-~- ~ ~a~~ ~~' ~ ~1~1-ems, j yO.Q ,eft u~ ,.c..saa_ ~~/z a ono ._.~-~,~~ . -, ,,,-=<x~" ~ .~t-<O ~ fix-, ~~ ~k- ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~,~~ ~°` ~'~~ S ~g m2 C~.go,-~~~o ~.~. ~Sho w th C Concerned 11 yefl-'r old, ..1~ ~eaJ1y 0.m not 0.~a~n~~ baseball , ~~~ ~~.st'~hat a lot o~ ~peo~le mho p\ay the games Peopi~,.. who are." f,~y~~n9 ~,o~sieep . (; g h~5 are ols a pro ~'2~t , I -2~ y re So b~ ight~ ~h Qt c~o~.,._ cc~,..~'~ pu,.~- -ac.~n ho;,rs on our bacK pai~'ia1 bo..rbc~.que ~ot dogs o,~id wa.~-ch the game, y Shokid Me 0.d ever one e,\se Po.y i-he Cyst- ~d a,iue up ~ Sleep ~ Por people, c,~ho dMn'f hs~e 0..ry COh~icl~rp,~i0n ~'or CJt,11~{ bc7c~\) o+' o,~y t-~~n9. P1eca.se don't IeE +he light.~s sfayar~~+~ii . 11 ~ bC~ o r 0.Vl y I ~r.~e r^ ~;p C~r~P1S2C'YiE~ t ~ year o~c~, ~iiY ur xr~:vur~u uuu~mvivu.l 1~IEIvIt7~i,ANDUM ~ `` DATE: March 8, 1991 T0: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services DirectoY BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE SCRF.nRT.F. ~ The Park Development Fee is a product of Ordinance No. 105 adopted in June of 1980 and amended three times thereafter. Two supporting Resolutions to this ordinance, 83-10 and 87-489 establishing population density per unit, and park land development costs respectively, are currently operative. Last updated in 1987, the land value in the six land use categories as well as the park development cost per acre are currently proposed for revision (factors L and D in the fallowing formula). The following is a brief review of how the in-lieu fee formula works: Formula: N S P (LtDI 1000 = fee Where: N = Number of proposed dwelling units S = Standard park acreage per 1000 population. P = Population per dwelling unit L = Land value as represented by land being subdivided D = Development cost per acre for park land. The ~~L" factor is a variable depending on the category of land use. In 1987, a land value was estimated for each land use category based on current land Sales in the City. The land values adopted in the formula at that time were at the 75 percentile of the range of each residential land use. Through appraisals accomplished in February of 1991, by J. [4illiam Murphy and Associates, the following updated land values are currently proposed for the six land use categories, and shown in comparison with the 1987 land values currently being used. Review of Park Development Fee Schedule March 20, 1991 Page 2 1987 PROPOSED LAND VALUE LAND VALUE ZO~Fi SYMBOL PER ACRE PER ACRE Very Low VL $ 43,057 $100,000 Low L $ 72,242 $125,000 Low Medium LM $ 91,233 $155,000 ..w_, ,._ Medium High MH w.. Y~+1,~7+ $152,305 ViJVIVVV $275,000 High H $211,000 $325,000 The "D" factor is the development cost per acre for park land. This factor was set at $80, 000/acre in 1987 and was based on the actual construction cost for Hermosa Park as well as development occurring in Terra Vista. The most accurate method proposed for updating the park development cost per acre involves conducting a survey of recent park development projects. In 1990, four Park Capital improvement Projects were constructed. Old Town Park, Weat Beryl Park, and Field Improvements at Cucamonga Elementary School and Etiwanda High School ware completed at an average cost of $143,000 per acre. This average is for basic park land development, i.e., reatrooma, turf, trees and play equipment, but no ballfield lights. With lighted fields, .his average increases to $178,000 per acre. As the park fee model is updated annually, the land value Factor can utilize the Engineering New-Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles" when actual land costs are not available. Utilizing the index is a method which provides estimates of construction coat increases without performing a detailed survey. Therefore, when there are years with little park development activity, the index is available. The index is a weighted-aggregate index of the prices of constant quantities oP structural steel, portland cement, lumber and common labor. 4evii'ri ~f raric Development Fee Schedule Marcy. 20, 1991 Page 3 T`e Proposed Park Fae Summary, which incorporates both the new land values proposed for the six land use categorise and the proposed park development cost of $143,000 per acre, is included for review and comparison with the Existing Park Fee Summary. In addition, copies of ordinance No. 105 and its sunn....g••: Reeolutlons arw aie~ _ttac :ou. EME/dak Attachments ec: Linda Daniels Jerry Fulwood Hrad Buller Jerry Grant Jim Nart Toe O~Neil Tarry Smith Park and Recreation Commission r~ 1U n2saursxae m, a7-.o ,~'~ „\ ~'~ \ nlnallJfSn W !9e C.7S CaoeCII. 01 :eE Ci T Or R!Y®0 r r ~ CaUl~ea\. Cl11raOIe. CSi7eI.ISeIna rereL\fL'Jn PCn ~I,~ cvaD,"Y^ 4na ron ~ Penross or a~rlcmrt:rc ce\Ptu 16,72 or tet em7esu. eau etu[2sa to zu DID7C313CY ar Y\n[ um etcnut:en I.m :3®/JS, the ^..ty Causil a[ the .qty aC Ravava GCaconya, CalltarnL. hY aawua CGYbr Ib.33 v[ tva Nmieipa! Caen, raLG_.e eo raeYLLieva far 8q\uelq of llq, De1~at at fqa. yr seh, Car iaax ana raenecihul :ua !o augiRaleve aha plesea Ca~iL:ae: qa IIDQL\S, oeocer 16.72 et CG MIn\papel Cqe uceelisaa • tarsla faWYive q • cOapOMhG. '(Lea) papYLLba par ara111oe ueit Oa a aeala aha aaLUac1 aac by eha nssaeieL puDilY cesay, as Y1aID61S. Steb :ev, altwcira Aasnn 7 ~ 19e3, raeulraa <tac 7wulaclon Cossaum aslorq In pule agWtis farsLa, are6 u case csuihs ritaln Castu 16.72 0[ tW ll;nlhiDal CoM, b raflavc:va oL tpa 'avaraaa a:ca of ua6 eleaa at heuaahvla• ay W see raesc FgarLL ar Stab avw Mich iSaCleaaa duce •-r^raatim; :'2EarPallE. 3! :: AW nlSa1.Y2D hY the Cl$ Caumil of tea Cty aC ?anaao Cacameca, ","toro:a u tellers: .. :..ac :ha C:tY Council anal! Cuarqu as aae oy nslucan cva avaraaa iwul.ae:an far oen clue of aomavall auq poq :ha coat recant igarai ar Sbu caaaua alneaam{ auep s.f:rnc :n: Goa ,. T.at :es v1cY :cunea anal! : peer ova ae,.ue. CY 'uol....c. '+arnpuh. :ea Dwulic:ov far aaav c~ of .:puaanDid as nraaaa ?aaara/ er $ab CaPTY '3Car9L3L6 :a 1aaYa0; iaa .. Sac :ye avanp papulaG:vn fu eau a:aaa aL houaasla ::n:::n 3anCa0 C:IGgnae, par c`J Staia CaoarwnG o! Ylnavaa 3pacul :anw a[ apr: of t9y9.:a ueapl•...w u fh1lera: ., 3lvala bs11Y Wbenq pwuLC:pn par unK is 3•i3 7araau: 3. Cwlai nalage3el acrua[ura papY11L1W for aaaa unit eonry.aa ehenu is nesllanq ae 2.43 iaraam: .. :lax raaiage111 aeroc^an pwulat/ev far aim 'm:t aovca>:aa ;main :a uueliuq ac 2.23 panopa: .. •'ou[91as na14gc111 ac[vCt'Ya ppDYlacie¢ L:r aaw Yhic :oatatnaa Chanlh Si gGgllanaa at 2.Ta: _. Yule!-fault nasagclal acrmeuru <qulaipe 5 ca 9 rsnaanciil untca par awcova, hoe uuollsq a pwuilc:s fee aahn unit asrasss thereon pL 1.52 panona: .. Yult:-fault rnshsGlal avueGUna esWUne la ar coca reaiauGlal uozca par acrscura Oee gHbliahq 1 ;epuJac:on fer aqn uuc cavraihq thereon pl I.53 paravva. .:41pALLL::6 eU. :. r lap 3 :61a 0+yolutlpn t++ll :+ appllr++l+ Ca glpulatiny :II+ api4cim pt :yeO.iyT+ae6 0[ :aN. ar :afd. :pl' pan ap r+yr+Kl+p+l laps as raauyt+a pT CL+ppr 16.33 of ea latelayp+l foray. ror csucin a++. ar pawl s0+ apypvp m or attar :aaurT 1, 1903. :a+aciYy +apa yr Datwl ~W +ppreyy+ pryer ce ar ey p+osss 31, 1903. yll: cosh nm yaLelry lp Nn b iy+++ at 'J'+ tai oP appronl va+ Q+p1:y0• tlit[D. Lt00t®, aa1 a00F[CJ c41+ Su av +t ++a+y17, 1903. 11C]: 441. 3yN+a.:c4lpasr. Fnac, MlY+L !IOO: I7pp Ors, ...' _ ° ^1aal;ty ,~: ~.. ~./G6L ~AryO. MtWaa..YtTef 1Il2L7i: (/ /~, ~~~1 ~ ~aune h. iy+++rse. Cyt7 G:+es a Or~~,~nal Poor C~ual;ty ucL3::cR ::o. a7-4a9 A RESCL:::CR OF :dE G° CODNC OF 18E C~: DF RANQ(0 COCAMOTi;A, Ci1L:i0RNIA, EH'SABL:SHINO AVERAG2 COS^. ?EH ACRE :D DEPeZDP ?ARE LAND IX PANCHO CCCA)l1NGA AND 2S:AHL:SH^R; AP'HAGt WS'. 7ER ACRE 8Y LAND USE DESD+NAT.ON 'R3 ACOIIIRE ?AAE LAND :V aANC.i0 (". G)x`!CA L:HE.gPAS. eha Ci c7 Cauaei: o! sha~Ciry o! Rancho Cucamonga, has sdoo:ad CSapue :6._'2 a! the Music :al Coda, alaeiag [a ragnlasiana !as dedication o! ;sad, paymane o! !w, ar both, !or park and raeruei nna l.d i~ .,,L.:ivvaom sad nl =nn.A ___~~~., ~d ~i07lEAS. Cbapser 16.32 0! the Municipal Coo eatabl iahu s lofcla ea uit•~g as camnoaaosa, "!the) avaraga coaC par acre eo davaloo park :and as teca~i:.ed bq she pabl is agency", sad, ^(tha) lair maskac value o! pariAaad per acre ae revruaaiad ;+ the :and hei¢g subdivided^; :3E.¢EY793, 33 :: NW RESCLTc^J by ehe Ciry Cou¢ei: o! Reecho Cucamonga as ;olh+a: .. ^as cha Cif Guacil shat: dateraina sod pc bl Ruolurion cha avaraga coat ter acre eo dave!¢n park lead is Aancho Cucamonga and :hs avaraga coat par acre to aeeui:a paskl sad is Raac`_o Cucamonga• and _. '.^_as __! Cln Couac~ shsi: :av iar sad ad?vac 6y Raaolusion, vhen var_aa:ad, the coat m dwalop sad stems park land i¢ Reecho Cucamonga: and :.a avaraga coat par acre ca Bevel cp tazi :and is Raxho Cucama¢ta :.a Saradv aacihliahad sc Ei;hty '^..:o¢aaad Dollars (Sa0,DD07, and it is that lignra o! ^3ghsy 'IDcaaand Dollars (Sa0,C00) per acre chat gill apply is the application a! (>sapcar 16.32 0! she kvaicipal Coda; sad . ^•a average coal par ac• m acquire park land is Rancho Cueaaan¢a, ecr cha purpaae o! imps assns Chapter 16.32 a! cha Mmicipil Coda, is hereby aacabl iahed by Laud vas daaig¢ariaa at: Tars Lw (TL) = S 43.057 par sera La, (L) = S 72,242 par acre Lcv Meditix (LY) _ $ 91,233 par acre :faaim (M) = 3133,678 par acre Sadi•,rs-itigh (HFI) = 5152,305 paz urn 3i:h (H) = 5211.000 par aeza 2~e . Original Poor r,i~f;±, and ac :hea• 2d,u: ea chat will ao?Ly la aoolipcioa of e of oramansconaa :!ua:ct?al Coda Chaucer. 5. IAa aveeaga roar per acza eo dwel op sad acquire park land as dacesmi:ed 6y this Raaolutioa shall apply ec untatfv mane at partai mans, aoproved or candisionally aoprwad, on ar af:nr Nwamhar 16, :987. '"he avaraga coat per acre co dwalao psrk land for :antacire mane or partai aqua aaprwed prior rc Nwamoar :6, 1987 shat: 'ce as ser, forth is Reaai u;ioa ao. d3-9 sad previous lead value method. Etfaesive Januazy 1, 1988, :he procedures and provision of Reaolusion 87-~89 aape:aade praraduru and provisions of Raaolution 83-9 and it .~..n w- .~_ r•~. iai@.. or :.uoiunaa 87-h89 rnich shall apply ~eo ali tsneaCVe aqua or parul aioa approved os condisionally approved vishouc rupact to data of such aPPrwal. ?ASSET, AP?RfNE'J, sad .1DOp1'H9 this 16th day of Septemhar, 1987. AYES: 3sa,n, 3ugwt, :tout, tiag, ;Jr ght )TOES: Yana ""~~ AH SE!i'!': Nona Daanis L. Scout. Picor 1 ~'~L ;-1 . ~. ~ 11~i Q y~ ?nveriy a./.luthelet, Ci' Carx _. 3E9E?J.Y A. W^.-.=_'. C:-: ,^.,,T-,y.; of the Ci7 of 3antho Cucamonga. Ca. iftr_ia, do harc'oy carci°j z:at the foregoing Rsaalutiaa vu dishy pasaad, anoroved, and adooted b the Ci7 Couacil of the Ci7 of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal i9os-ia, at a :egulas meeting of said Cif Couaeil bald on the 16w' daa of ~20iemheL. ]?H7. ' ~ecat ad :his 17th daa cf Ssntsnhar, 1987 nt Rancho Cucamonga, Ca: if ssia. Hwerly AL Autheias, City Claris RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCYL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE TO DEVELOP PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE BY LAND USE DESIGNATION TO ACQUIRE PARE LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONr_n WHEREAS, the City council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, has adopted Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, relating to regulations for dedication of land, payment oP Pees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities; and WHEREAS, Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code establishes a formula requiring as components, "(the) average cost per acre to develop park land ae determined by the public agency", and, "(the) Pair market value of parkland per acre as represented by the land being subdivided"; THEREFORE, SE IT NOW RESOLVED by the C1ty Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. That the City Council shall determine and set by Resolution the average coat per acre to develop park land in Rancho Cucamonga and the average cost per acre to acquire parkland in Rancho Cucamonga; an3 2. That the City Council shall review and adjust by Resolution, when warranted, the coat to develop and acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga; and 3. The average cast per acre to develop park land in Rancho Cucamonga is hereby established at One Hundred Forty Three Thousand Dollars ($143,000), and it is that figure of One Hundred Forty Three Thousand Dollars ($143,000) per acre that will apply in the application of Chaptsr 16.32 of the Municipal Code; and 4. The average cost per acre to acquire park land in Rancho Cucamonga, for the purpose of implementing Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, is hereby established by Lard use designation at: Resolution No. 91- Page 2 Very Low (VL) _ LOw (L) _ Low Medium (LM) _ Medium (M) _ Medium-High (MH) _ High (H) $100,000 per acre $125,000 per acre $155,000 pes acre $250,000 per acre $275,000 per acre $325,000 per acre and that these figures will apply in application of the aforementioned Municipal Code Chapter. 5. The average coat par acre to develop and acquire park land as detnrmined by this Resolution shall apply to tentative maps or parcel maps, approved or conditionally approved, on or after March 20, 1991. The average cost per acre to develop park land for tentative maps or parcel maps approved prior to March 20, 1991 shall ba as set forth in Resolution No. 87-489 and previous land value method. Elfective Juna 1, 1991 procedures and provision of Resolution 91- supersede procedures and provisions of Resolution 87-489 and it shall be the provisions of Resolution 91- which shall apply to all tentative maps or parcel maps approved or conditionally approved without respect to data of such approval. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ENGiNEEA1NG NEWS RECORD C.C.I. LOS ANGELES ,~ Pc.=.iOD '~ YEpq ~ C.C.S ~ CHANaE I 196s ,,tas I I ~ 2 :967 1,303 1.0% I 1966 1,275 6.9% ~ a 1969 ',309 27% i '970 1,382 13.296 ', ~ 6 '9l7 1,706 16.0% I l '972 1,366 15.4% i 1911 2.;99 S.8% I ' '974 2.280 a6% i ,, '975 2.886 736% '. '976 2,923 73.0% '2 1977 3,162 8.2% ' '3 '978 3.421 a2% 'I 's '979 3.Y9 6.4% '' _ ;980 s,102 127% 'S !981 4,537 10.4% t7 ~ ;982 4,934 &9% j '~8 1983 6,C66 26% i '.9 '99d 5.<60 3.a9e a ,3e6 s.a47 a6% ,9es s,afiz o.t% ~~ 22 '9e7 5,474 0.4% ~ i7 1988 5,771 5.4% ~ 34 1989 5.790 Oa% !_5 !990 5.993 3.590 ~] 1 =able 1 1 OOr Quality ^nDt^nt¢E m. :Ds //\\, eir~a~ P 4_altD' Ni vRDihmL[ aF T. ,:,ri auncu yr nIL c[TT ar Rw[Ily c.L'lnlncA. CALL FOSn IA. ESTnOL:SiI L'IC RLLDLI- :C:IS ivA CLUIGITICII of L.\pp. PATHENT Or PCC4, JR :0211, F^.R PARK nn0 M1LLRNTICt1AL WIO lfl SURO{V1410115 .wU fLUm[D CCMnuH ItILS. [- Ta Clev Counell o[ eh. City o! Rdneno Cueawnp, Glltarnla, daN ordain a fo11aN: :Ntlvn !: [ncme and Gevn1 Pevv(f loot. tha lnpne of ehla a[d hueea 11 [e provw• [vf tot aevempwne a[ pa[( aN [arg61¢Ml C uaeillciN utwN wNlvblon nruia[lona. In an aria vhan tha NM for Darw hN NN prunSnad. Each wbdlvldar of {aN foe rwldmclal . shall, at a cowlclan c¢ the nppwval of • ltnal wrcal wp, lSnal tuadlvialae Na, yr vlannN <onauniey, dNleau laNa or pry (fu la lAU [gamL yr • cpNla[lon at bow. for pack aN/ar we[Nelptul pu[paua. padlea[San [NUlrmnw wall b. eomaYN m cha Cl[1 aenC¢ww[ tv ramNNlw vt Mr final pawl e.a yr 11na1 wMlviaivn fm er e.f n. cv 1ntuNa of bulldtN wnl N. In liw !ap atoll ba paid to cba clp prier ee lawon o! buLLdin{ paeueu. 9Ndoe I. RwuleaYnq. Lad o[ [aw rNUdrN uNar cola rmrlen anadi Sr cenrww ar v.u vlrwcir ce cb CLtY vE Ranens <Nra~aaa• IDs C1eY is attwela( ausn lave or tuNa abll dwaNp Na load ae Na cha funds a hwaN Drovldadt ' IA) of LaN and Pud. Tha land, hN, or emleaeion chariot •n m as uaN only for [ha vurmu of Orwfdina pa:R ¢r rN[aatlpwl faeillelu unleh veil cuaotuely aarva oe bwatlr fu[un paidmn e! taco suNlvlaivn. L .b) Ef uel Alwanc aw Dwalepn.nc TSva. AnY !aN cellaccN stoat cliff erdlww• malt b. eaa~a¢N vlthlo lava p1 Y.Na at ur eh. paynme at men tm or cha laauanea at balldlntt panln on ova-aalf of rho lvu crw CN ev na fwdlvlalon, vnlehever ¢ceun lira[. LI such fNa a riot c¢:reta N, cMV rna Ll S• dlatnSUCN and paid to eh. thm ¢eia ravwb vi • fua¢ivblen In :hf uva p[¢pp[[SaO [Sae cha also of mal[ la[ cuo tp ~:ea [oul aria of all loo vlchln cha fupe1v1a1ta. iU brio OlfDap LClon. !n cM ewnc rna[ ¢ppercuviclu for brcur :¢naclnn iaeillelw man [Swa DenvldN by cb oNleulon ' curlalisf. :cr :aria to aadlcataa Nv 0• mid vitn Ma pmnNf chara- tran 0a1n[ uaN lar tatrable Dark aria uerweien [aelllelN vhleh Nwa [ha nai(he¢eneN la unten rpet alrp Ss /xa[id. fD) :nlv tha paywmt v! [Na [hall ba rmvdnd 1a fubdivlaSoN vt lu• [4an i1t:Y t:01 loq unlNf .rnN otharvLaa br cha GSt9 Counell ' and [ha auoelvider. ' IE) SunaaNa tar Dadlcaclvn. Tha sewn[ of laN [a ba LNlu na or ;w ieN c¢ ba paid mall bear a nnaonaola nL[SV[unlp u :Aa u . of vnailu vi tha pars an¢ venation laellleln by chr fo[uo ruldmu of :hr avoaivirl¢n. tha Clcy Counoll hwfoJ wuglLhN a neio ¢t f • (!1 :ors attar ro a r ehpeNM (1,DDU1 population, In accordance ven tM mowed Pak aria Raecuclon Elume o[ Ma Clty'f cana[ai Zlan. L IF) ~.wun[ of Park Feu Rawlnd. Vhw cha nvplemvu vt thif eea• a c.roeled vleh or, the pools vt DrovShcnR park [ua, cN ~..SnSwv acwuna vi'tua w b• nald hull b• eavDUUa by auvR cha fallw>nR totwla, SF '~. JI .,..VU einmun r<t- :ALR[: Originla Poor r:t~l a,. a • nwoar vi Crvpoaw dvulln{ unlta. +' plannw Dart ac raga par 1,000 Dow la [Lw, F Copulation pw owlllnS unit on a web am drone/ aec by cM naponalbla public yam Y. . fair .emu kar value of puklavd per acre w :wnam ud by <Ea laM belw sYbd lVldad. 0 • wanSt coat Dw aeu cv dwalap Dark w dwarelnw by [ht wbllc a{an<y. fE1 a.,,•... ._. _ ______ _ vt :his •ae nvv art evmlbd uleh an cha'wua of pravidAa{ pask ibgd,• cha alnlwr stem[ at laW rwuletd atoll ht cha emuet vh1m0 ewll be pu[enaam viN [ht !tw emw[w iq Saeclap $(F). (tl) Fart aM Rwnaelenal Vw Mod Fair Markle palvt. The f+1r mukac value atoll ba wnwtnad a Tha c1w o! nwre+Cw e! cha v+rcal mat yr f1u1 ua iv +eeardwea vieh eM [nlloviv{ eritavias ;:7 :Sa Ea1r vurrn •wlw w danrelntd by el0-Oiey caunc>l; ar, ':7 ;.'.t auvd SVidar ab7wn to awh welwtloe ht ~av, ac hla qw awama. oa taim w +ppraaul of eht prewrq by auautll[SN rnu nca c• appratar lrvv cna 4waral area apprwq by cM Git1..LMe6 apps sau mw M acewuv by cva Ul cy Cvuwll it fount rwaevebla II) :vmbmacsvn vt Parr Land and Fwa 0.puirad. Yhav ..-.: ir,a c:en vi :env aev:cac:en env !m 4aa era required as a evwielan ._ ; val, :ha is it :anar vacua v cnaviaw m ba dwkcacw, as -rnev vurauwc c.¢cvn :(B),rand cha in !lw few, as cowuud ?ac civn :IE, roil b• ar a evwa 'n ma [o prwLlan vi Swtlan -Glravpi Ld co cca enct:• cove iviaion yr piaww eoneual ty, S ec CVn i i;c evure. :h• rwutiawnn of chid Ordlpawa met can~~r-.anc :a cr• avpravai of pL ESnal wrcal m+p, (}:ai va vl vsan wo, yr :ba vbww comuni ry, ar Drlvr cv taawvet o! • as iidinq pewica. sv cna prcvu lan of peer land Sn vhalt o[ Sn pact. CM ai a Para :w, ee ;y a cawiw noa a[ botA w rtquirtd by cha ' ..... :.unc il. (A7 acr OD etc n. Ae :n• clea of Cilin4 + eweaeiw cn c; av yr a m:wr sow Yi is ian vlac iar aPDroval, cht C1 cY alull dece r-ma Vnacher aw rcacivn vi Drap w cy tar Cark ant ra<vaciowl Cu rom es yr !n lAu v[ lane ue nww urv. :! the CS CY dwlua dadlcatlvv. :h< cna anall S• aecgmcm vn the once ilw cuee map obey wbelactd. (E7 .\c[:vn v Cf rv. Ar cha time v[ [ht Tame ClVa [Talc may avn coon, iM F!annanS Ccm ualpn :hall daetwiva a parr e( nen avn rove 1. vMCmr :v nvuua a aw lea nan of laud vlehtn eht tubdivLlvv, payment of a fw :a _.w cMreaE, or a comeSw civn oL bo ch. L G:1 ?:enaulatree dvr Avp ravq of Fiful Map. 1,bwt dedicac:Dn is vtfarw env arc eecw i; snail ST aeewpllahed In aeebrdanet '+irn cna Dtvvta iqm e! ra Subd ivialen !lay ACC. 'Ihwt fwa act Slptll[ed cne same shall St gaoou caa vuh c.^.a [1 c: ;: SVr ev cM laawnee et building permits. ' .~ ., cerviwciono. rA~jiJt ~n?ln~v*tXis,ibn in~il ~/ :c,rrminC '.r:`L[ •••-~ =ai,a aa!:;a[ian. rr!':::! ^aY~2^! :L i fwC ' !n Ilw cha[wr. n a~cpmviwctan vi :vin, ov commas[ton es :aa falloulnq: , taernuanu aleun[ a( ch[ r[mral assn: am :aPOgrapuv, ;eolegY~ a •ana Lucauvn of :am In cna aupatvlalen avallaPla rpr awlcactonl eam ']1 Slu am snaps of cha aumlvir lon aw lam rvulabla [n mww wan. .-c) uk ana pacrwclowl Jaa lau-vntll[ for Prlvau ¢pan Span. Ihwa prlvara open awn Eor park am nesuclpmL pu[pvu• a pravloN to • prppeaw suvviv[alen antl such ap¢a is co ba DriW pis oMN am Ylp[alnw hY [11a Eu[an [n Ld[n(J p( Cila fuM1V 1[loO, aucn ana aMli S+ <rwiu+ up ce flf cY (50) pareane agalme eM rwui[aapr at dN4callon for parr aM ranwclon pu[pvY+. a N[ fa[ch In Swden 3fC7, DwwdN rM Palwam ta~ualen [1Ma lc Sa lv cha wslle ivuna[ (1) :hae Yaaa. coure ar¢u, N[baW and e[ha[ opm a[w rwulrN 10 ba pwcalnw by cha aowNq aN bu11d1eS raty/aclou atoll not ba ineluew Sn cha cap~~don of weh prban epw apNa: am fE1 ;ha[ cha privau oamwahlp aM minremnca of the ePw aNU is avavuauly Provides (or by vrSCUV agnwnc; am '7) tae cha uv of eM privau open apses fa rm¢ieew fpr aarr am r eauonai :urpvna by nevraN cwamvca vnlch [vn oak s :ana le laver ai [ha iucan epa[a of Cha p[epa[q v1Niv ma c:acc; ana '-) :hac :M pmooaN p[SVau ww apam /a naNmolY adaocaela Ear ~: a far ;au aM v<rudpm1 purpvwa, cakinS iota <ovndanclop ucn Eac cats as an, mava, cooegrapnv, EaoloSY, aeon aw 1vnelen eE cna Pri': aca cyan s:aca .ana: ana „ ::uc :a<i::::es v[ooeaw i r cha assn aoau a :n sues wac:a. acccrcanu ~nch :be c: aviuom vE :.. wcN Ci¢ml uwwc of :ha 4weru D:an, iM an approves 'cy the PlanvivgcCamauaen. '?) aM Aecreacional Land Cutlit fo[ Plamw :ammuniClaa~ =hare [.•,rRa von ,pace Eor park am nciufioml p¢[powa .a pcmvipas :n a aiawea cavuni cy am porclom of or all men sows is w ba pnva[eir owes aw mmuiua ov cM fu[ura naldavca of [M ' pi+nnw cvmaamlrh v. mic aS+ipac cba rpuLrwnc of dNlmelon [pc park am r ucaoma purvwn, a c forth Sn Sacrien 2(C) atoll ba daca[¢l¢N :hrvugurcaa aaepcun vi :ha plaww cavaumcy cut prwSdN. Swwac, cMC cha cars auneara for said plannw coomMq is chv aw a far avy a char awuvnenc ana :.::u :ha Planning Cvmaauion ilnda is Sa Sn cM Dvvllc :auttac :. w so, am chat wa io lipuin6 acamartla ara mac: oc y -Me Yarea, coure area, aaebaeu aM ocMr apm areas r suites maavcaina dv eM mnmq am bu11dlvS n6uLClaea snap a mwnaa :cache cemPUCa~on of such Drlvau open apau; am .Zl :hac cM pnvau wnwakio am minumnea of L cha ePan wavr is a<evmulY P[evidad Eor by uHC[w aevwnr; am it :hac : vE cM privau opw apau fa [e,[[i::ta :-. :i[1t anp reCLra[lonal PYCpnaaa by [w¢[dN COVaNOrp ~hicn ran vita tee :ana :n favor vi :..• iu[ure avnan a( rha propaccY 'n chin n• ::acc; acv face T~ OCly.i~u' ! ii';; rv C r.~l't`J' ~1 .'.la[ U:e rra eopeP arlYa ce aDpn sDacp is [eaaonsoly :p :.. S:r :~. Ji(n e:.3 (v e3 t10 nia vurvaspn. oak anq Into !ny rririvw sncn'f ae cors•aa Lte, 3mof. :anagraDny, ecology, 3ccma am Ipra[lOn pE [nr Prtva [p oprn :Paco tim: anp t5) :na[ Facill cl en oroovaatl for the opw apau an En suoa tan[lal +cca[oaeu nth ch. pfaWalone of ch. [attutiomi alawnc vE cm gwaua iua. am ara appcww by cm Planning torualon. Sett can v. Exam uana. IDs p[ov b lam vt [h1a Ordlwara da nac avp ly to ccwareaal ar lnauserlal suvdlvialana: nvr tlo rhq apply co cvnopatniaa pro pets vnlen cona/ac of eN aubdlvbige of airapaea In an east sag awreaap[ nulld lvR vnl eA la wn cMa Etva (3) yaaH aid vhae no nw tlvalling uni[a art aMad. Se<elvn 5. vennlll b:, [( anv wbeaeeian, mbd iv le ton para4rapn, aanrlMr, <SaWa o[ pnraY b tna prdlNpca. pp aPy parC eharwi, la Eve aq roam hold tv va invalid oe uaeamdtueiona, awh daef]1on shall nac at bce cm validity vE eha caw lnleg aaedam a[ pprclana of cMa pplmnca or aey parr cna[aot. ma ClA Uuw11 haNbY a•-'•-" _ .. na.w • n aaccivn, auwwrlpe, auWirlalvv, paraaaaph,•amcaacaaclauaa ar phraNCOi cAla vrdlMwa irrbaacrln of eha tar[ rlu[ say ou or wra tae clpm, fubweelev, autllvlalam, pargrapM, aaecaaen, Wwa or pnosy wy Oa damlavtl invalid or uncpm dcuciomi. See C]n $. Eme ®snP Tha Mayer shall algv this ordfmvea m cna Clcy 4arr smal ac nae n cna saw. am cna Glq Otask aNll cauu cna saw <a ba publlahatl urchin flE nan (11) days aECar SG D+aaagq ai Lo[ oMa la IDs Carly 4eporc, a nmpapar pt gawgl circaia clon. ;mllanw !n cno Ciro vi Onrulo, and clreularatl to cha CSCV ci Rancno ticaonga. 2ASSE0 AlyrOVla, antl AOOPtCJ [h1a 4th tlay of Jum, 1910. BYES: 3rldge. Yigala, hvn c. Schleuar ;IDES: .ipne ,1dSC(L: ?alnvvp waxen M. .al pa[cw. : : 61ux \J~~ s/INr"kt~Gh~CL Ph1111yt 0. Sc4losuc.:ayvr L :ItOL'bUICE ::J. .:3-A :.Y Cap[4NICL :F ^E C:S! ^.: ^ICIC LF ^IL r;-; OF PRIWIO ..r'_:OhOA, '.A.:i OatI G1, ::Iftlp[%c prtp[ANILE ap. :Ol. 3• Cav Cvunell o! cda Ll r/ at ftaaano Cuwwnp. Calltarnla, :vu ordaw as :vllvuu SEC':]tl l: Saecien 7-F vE Ordlwnca Nn. 1W Sa Hrrry carnead a• ioi_ova: C lark sod PKnaclon+l Linn Cndlc for Planned Ln.runltiw. -~•rr prdran awn [pN[ !vr pau ann r•agclvnai purppua La prwaeN In a plamr coawnuy and parrlow of or all aueh rpaw la m ba ysivr[LLy rvnM aM NmtainN by cM futon natd•nn v( she plapnra cr~anacy ^r ppelldY aNa<lrN aN YlnraaPN br a ap•c1LL aN•rMea dlktTler, :role ae4wc cha rNUtismc of drdlwcamn toe n•.u ..a ---- - . r•c mrcn is Sm[lvn 3-G aM11 br derntead thrweh rb avoocaen~o! chr Olanpr coaapuPL1Y cake pravidad, Iwwree, cMC cN part auwerd for aid plan edeeaeipl as cM acme u tar my orMr airkalrpree aM [fur cM Plarlaa Corauion !Sods R !a in cha public iaearue eo .e r am r.~e :?a fallauan9 acawarva ae< mat:" SEL^.^:1 2: dll nchar Cortipm at OrdlPanea lp5 rboutdzaraa Sn Fa3: !om avv aiFKC. ~::a l: pA• Poor rwll clan chic Crdinanw and cha V Cldrk rnala CTWa cha rake co Ul Oupliehrd V/rh1P lSttdm (15) days vEUr La pound •c Seur enc• In 17;a pa.1L BaCaaG, a nmwpu of ynr[al circ:asnvn povllanrd in cna Clt9 of OnunP. Calltorvv. and L o:cuiacr to :aa Ci:y :F zannno Gcamowa, Caliloroaa. ?A55L]. ,'.PPlOYEp, u v aCOPII^. thin IB CA daY of luM. :?D0. ,,. _. :.:v.:akua. laanaoo, 3ridee. 5<hlvn•r OCES: 'loot ASSENT: "ant ph111,1p p. Scnlvuac, YgOr ,T_Si. Lauvn M..uncvuo. L:[rx L r, ,~ , :notnnuw 1:0. !as-a xN OROI!IhNGE Of THE h:;'I COUtICIL DI mt4f GItL _ ;f *ANLNO 57UM09LA. :;LSPOaN1A. ANEMOIIN: ^URER '5,32 OF '1!E .iANLNO CUCAIgNOA '!UNICI7AL CCOE REI.lTI!IC T7 PAa% ANO RfCREATIOG ::,aD, :::ccLOI1ro savmcs Feovalaxs. ~ ~a Cl:,% Cpuneil of tM Ci:y of awmo WcaswSa, dna orM1n as fG31a V1: SLLT:C!1 +: CMpesr i6.3z of tns borne Cuaaaon{s Nnalelnl Coee Sa MrseY +.a[[aw p1 awnelnS Seoelpn 16.33.010 to roe .• -,__a. •]rcetpn 15.72.010. :nt Mt aM OaeMl ?roYla "fit Lntnt df tAla eMpter Sa Lo pterlea fpr tM dvelap.snc of Dar![ and rwnas10ns1 fee»St1u thraup aY0elvtalOn reaklaclpna. Sn w area vnsn tM new rw n9ldaptlal use, anal!, as • ed1012fOn tp tM spproyal pt a :m4Llve Yp, parcel iYp. plsMSS ce~tehtY, laM SNLLepawt cr real eaeats on»aDMnt, dalau lama er paY fen to lieu [bsrreP, or a coYlMSlm of Ooth. ter .' trlSheeMped aM cvMUna er park ar rwnssion! purpenb unp c0 aaeiafy de»eatlon rnulrewnn atoll Se oapYeYSO :p eM e1:Y ae Les ern of rwprdatl0n of txs fiMl pp ar parcel sap. Cn :Seu Irea atoll bs pald to Ms Clty prler aces taauance at WS1d1n6 pasts.' '-:;0 ¢. ;`.apter '5.32 ^t the flneM Cucuwya Yup1s19a1 Coda :a cerepy amrneea :/ :ddlrg _vbaecc;an :o Ssaclon 16.32.030 to rasa as .:.vr. "CI I!otat 6:acannln5 anY ocher prpvlalona Sa tfila :raocer a c.`,a contrary, for cenuLlva rpa ane Dareel ®pa aDDnveo ar eendi LenallY apprpvsd afbr Oacsbar 31, 1907 :ee amoune st lano ?nleaUtl or flea 9»d atoll bs tOad :csn :e• reunsnUal renal ty, vnlcn atoll er tlnarMZeO :n :es :aala cf :hs _D;ravn er copoleloMlly +pprmsU imntiye rap ar recce! Mp and tM arsraNa ewMeld alas :au craft ue ihn Ywuunlmww uamc pwaaurY to grcYide :ens area st party arq par oM Lbousan0 DsrsaU rsfldinS viola alien aubdlvialon. Far the purpMSa nt aDD1/1n% !hs fareula fauna in sumsnclsn F of Lola amalaa to awk auotllvislona. v epuala recce and P aha11 ba tM avsraSs al:a of each claaa ai eouamOld YICn1p aucp auMlvlaion. :f my aYnn aupolVlatan Cnngl^.a laara tllall nM C111a Of bowenoid, a nepance temputatlDn wiry LM toraitb in ~ auwme:pn F of cola aretlen atoll be pads for sash nlaaa I ` sf navaenpid vlthln alien wOdlvlalon aM LM 'mpL.n fn' ,'ar :ne nnrace ralculatlen atoll bs adOW CoestMr tp :nenav the mmlNap fee for tna wbeblalpn b a v[gIs 'pr :ae purpose of deceroanins drdicaDlon rpolraMntS•". _ " _ ;;'! + ;Saeeer 'S.Z or tSS Raneno CunwWnp Nunlelpal Coda nereoy arandrp ry apdirg S~naect:Dn C W Section 16.32.030 to raw as a:.m; P!annen ?evalopaanta aM rn3 ntau :evucawnta as vflned !n Ssoclana X1003 ape 11007.1, rooeeclvely, of Las CalltornL Bwlneu an0 Prepnlau :ads. anal! es el lR tale ea recelYS r eretllt. 1n an awlt decrntpea by reaClucltn of the Clty Couwll, aplnse the awnt of lann nMind to bs dedlCatM, or Ma aaount of :rtl tngee :b. '75-a ?agf Z '.ne f!p uCpoaCO. Dunaanc to tole Cnaour: for Nf valve Of "vrav{q e0en apace rt Ch In LN tlfaflpppMi 'mien la Uaa\plf for avcwe revreat icnal uafa. 7nia auvaaeelon anall appl% only tJ planned developsfnca and real efwN tlevelweMea ror vniCn Gatatlve ma0a or paroLL ®pa an avDrorb yr <ondlLlanally approvb afbr OMbOfr )1, 19gt. Thf cradle allawole Dwaugt co thla aYpabtlon alull, Lf appll\tl (or, of in lleu of any o[Mr crglt allowela ~~• .-,.a. C*_C.:"n e. !Iptnultlutane4u{ any aNfr Drorlalon of 3bb Up or a1tlIM110a ar faaOluCipn O( Cnf C1CY 0( RanOne CuOYaq(a, SL1 LM argt of a fiwl ludlcul tleumnatlon coat anY he mr dbiwLlOa rablrfagt lopvaed by Cnapcfr f6.73 v( the ganenp uleaapng\ hunlalDal Cepf, a1Nfr as SC ena[fd pfipr Ce :he efhcelw Dat• a( this prolnnwe, ar q ambafd ty Nla :ro LlanOa, :] UI aRCfla of Lna naairYp pa1YlLCad py $La Ca 1]V, awn faf Or :LOiea Llon nouuasnL pr note, <MLl of pff\fi rbuvb CJ ana flxae •C Nf yaamllm nUNLl:% Or apWriC CnaL [ha IJYfL da Ca111Ma ml(SIL naYa eab laV(Y 13Y :JWaaO pY :hf C::% pVCNM[ CO ae orainaa0a \dODCap YOOIr CM {YCnOr1Cy at :allfornaa CvnrnpnL CJaf Saccivn e6u17. :_'CL!1 +• ;t:e Lity C<wvll Nnpy dfalarfa Lh\c I[ rou30 M1arf aapocad eala oralNMa aM NCn aMLSDO, aueapOLlOe, abtan0a. eLwf. pnraaa :r parLien tYreof ;rrefeec[Dn pf CG feat that am Olle or mpn ab[100a. ]uOarC[SDpa. ]fp[anaaa. aaVab, Dnraal] Or pOrLlOna [nlra0( ~e dMlarM -valid or pncpnati:uC•~paa. =.`.en all achlr prpvlalOm Cnfrapf MLL1 retlln Sn ....:<ree env effr:. ++^ "'~ ..:a nayor tnall algn tole Ortllnanw and the C1Ly :1DrK Mall uuae to cne aaw, ana L.;a Clty Clark atoll caws cna a\a to Or NO11ahe0 V+Lnill f f[aM l1$) Ciya after lea Dasaalla, aL laHG opC1 In Rfa :>a:v Peovrt, a moaper of genmLL clfevlatlon. Duallanq Sn tM C1Cy or .11~J lu :a(nJ. _IW ,:;.1'CUIJLVV :.I ..lu C'1 LY OI' IIL1,VIn1 l'uOOYWUIV. '1146C, 1]P.:dyEC, and SCCP2EC chla Iat day vl CroMDq, 1983. 1TL•: Lahl, ?ueuet, 3chicaaer, SroaL. HIkLLa :ICYS: 'AOna A81aSi: Sone ~~~~~ Jon P: flikala, I4yor I //) L R>wan H. MaPreq, :LL'/ CerK ..r _,~, 0[OlaAlt[[ Y0. IOSt M OtCfrU[t 01 711C C1T7 e1 Mll[XO COCAI101CA. CALI701111G, Mp0[t0 3018[RION C MO i oI StCTt011 16.33.070 01 StA MIiGTO GIIGIMIItA fpttC[IAL CODt [RAT[K lb tAQ Ab0 tt[ttt7I0W. IJY6 OCO[DAt[0[ A[Oa[tLl[M[S iDa Cltt Cvunecl of cn• Clp of tateN Qit•try. Calll•nl•. tlw arNt• N lell•wr 3Ntin 1: IYNNLIN C of Stetlpt Ib.73.W0 a! tM Auttr Qiatlrtta 'uaiclrtl Cede U Nnh atat•N N fellow[ 'C[Nlt ter Hint. Orrt spara^ Wn RtnN orrn astir !9r p•n aN rnnaal•t•1 ntPN•. U prpvLNd t• . Inrtrw auNl+blN. aN aM0 •rtat b er N /Nnnh •rtN W aunulbN h [4 lut•n n•l4tu o{ [N nNbbtp, n•• •r•r t•. e. cn•{tN 4•We nac atrr tM• [tlt/ D•nxe Lnm. „n rgtt[~t•t e! 1NLLarlw aN a.~-'=~ :ur part +r rwrwtN PaePww, Y Ni fNt- tL [nL utie\t, N tM aarw.a bt taN to fiw tbrttt, n m l•eN b•nlt, prvgtlN eV IItrW f9raNte• t1N• la 1• t. eM pWl1t tt[tn•[ b N N, aN tear iN Gli•tW •t•Nted• an Mrr (U tbat nN•, cebrt anu, mbNN aN etb+r epN arm r•atirN a ba atnuNr h eN Haiti •N beilllY rn+nba• e! tbN fd• rb41 rt .• iN1WN to tb eeaFinUaa of 9uen orlran eNt •rac•t aN (31 Cbae tna vrinv ounennls ad ulpett•N• 9t tM efr •rN. b saaeu•uLY pm+WN for h u6te9• gntNN; aN f l7 1ar [nt un at [n• brlnn opa tlNt t• rnert<tY !oi Park •ed :xnarlvnal pvhnu b+ renNN e9raNart rbtep ct[t tltb eb laN la t•nr o! • •rlnr awri Inrnrn. .,I ~ .. N~b4. uin m,M Nlniw n.W nblae IlnnO['b• a•tl•[N er LLlllgatld V1C11eVt rn• CVa•rni 9t Cb• fAe•blli aN ':~^qL :..L vr9vond VrtvLn Dorn na<• la nNeNelY Wet1N• [9r- .se a[ per[ aN Rbnrti9np purp9an, :aalOs Iv[e C9N1Nn[Ln .ebb (orlon u nu, ana9e. aevttayn Y, :mivq, ¢nu aM loca[iaa of tN p[b•b om .. a[a IoM: IN (7) tat tart! It L• pr9N•N tae tn+ Dora •s•e• u• le aeN4Nltl . _vrtlanca n[n [N xart•tom vt :n+ :nn•et9t aN Part• r1eWe of tN ~ natal pLe tar en. Cl[Y aN •n approrN h cM fi•Nlvt tetnUtbb; aN t6: ^.ur eN tlettu. Span ap•N tee enteb <Ntt e(11 br emldtrN .. ;aru acrn aN Pn•tda • LLa Wa o! tour of ch• •la•ran lb[N b•lov, oc canatnacd9• et turn, aN o[nar neru[lanal 3•rn+wtu cbae rill •t•t [N :arch is re<na[lp9 paYR Nwv of [nt tuipn [UN•Ott o! tna •rnr Celttria Wt A. ^rlld[av:r ;lq appara[ua 9. Y~111 bubacub plctlc aot C. Ci•a LOVLL a[a• J. Brit vovl aitn ad Jaune rata avd aNllllatl /•e111LfN _. irerutloa vulld lnc Tha nNNldar n9unclln[ ten ldecaclon for pcintr ep•t rPae• etNlt mail, a part 9f [N aunlt[al t113nS. :Nludu 1. vrl¢.n nouur for aa<n eeNldtntlpa bI eG fl•ttW Cbt•Ua1ee; and ~~- J ,-i t~ ,~~ r_ ~~ - 3. Sucelt l+blbd lira and OKltlutlta tee +fue +N lepror+aep ulttlo autn prepota Prlvtu erye yue, Tt /lae+ty CoKUelen abeil, ate dKar of be mtw br prlnu o/w aWe crKlt, at/le8 eoaMm W rKeeKNetippt !rw t14 Mrt OMlopae /'o~Ytbe an +11 teen q/llu[loa. SKe1K 1: SuttKUae C of Sb[iae 16.32.0)0 ok [M Ceeeee CYStrye MK3e1pLL CGO p ntnq ,Kettl a (olleOt: 'tkYtt (es hbta t~ a/Ke - fle00N fa~teW' uNrt prlwb apte spur for pd[t W rKeMtloal pba7Na u prorNN b t /LtrN e+~altr td pertloa a( at dt auct tpta U m M peionlp ereN W aub10N b/ to futon euldart at tN O1++W ettttrlq or pW11c1f dNWtN +N aluelad b/ a +ppe1LL aea/Mt d4tne[, ettllt sAlat ed rrnlNtweee of eNleenee rot pen W ruwele.a -~ - , u eec tertb lb SOeeIK Ib.l}.Opn r - e+nntW tteKtY eN O/OOt1M et `.. v:+eae esruet tat; prsrleN, howNe. tWt ere put ttttWN fet ib p1+etN co~tt/ U cs. atr u ttr +q oiler eenbt~/t W tbec tN p(+aaaC caWttK elNt U !a to [1u petlle tot+rwS m av K. ,ed tNt [LO ac+KeNe ter pftnre +ne aptce, ++ nt artb 3+ M[iee 16.72.0]0 C. in at. Moon ): Ail acNr portion at Ordlaat 103 Mil emb lp full lore W tst¢c. SK[ton +: ^.u r+r+r an+ll ttan colt 0[d1aKt ,d rM Cltr Cl+rt +all cta+ ca ++K co e+ nnnlLMd rl[M1le E1tun (l31 deP our Ib Patae ac :b+[ +KO l+ pfit C+tlr art. s nevas+wr of nurtl clreul+olon puplbbN :n ca Cltr at Onnno, .mu, ,n <lreuletN l+ ent Cl[i at IIYOCN we+OOM+, hlltoinl+. ?ASSm. AP/tf>•C3. .+ ApOfTCO corn la[ d+r of Autat. :9St. :YES: -Ri'c~ -Jau+c. 'tkup, LM1L. 'l,Lnt V065: ':one aBEEYt: '~un+ (~/`/i~ /a, ti/ :an u. ntuta, rarer i/( at'_3~: ,- r l+r+raYC n. ,:ucaue.:..v :az+ .. ... .. .. .... ~ .. , r :'r.': .... t.lu.r., 9e.::i;; ~ .. ~.~ J:G~. tJ1 W W LL v Q 4 S W ~ I ~ I'! N ^ •+ O1 ~ O v' m h c u n OI C ~ f"1 I d M M ~ q M f T • V .~ Ill O1 In rf N +~ j I 1 OI `? Cl Vl ti n I[I O ID O 1 ~ w 6 4M M V1 M M 1 1 1 W 2 • ~ a ^ m .^ e ^+ n uai' m N e e In rl .o ~ N In a 4a m i N 6 H N M M M M W ~ y a O~ ~ N ~ Pf m 4p m m Q ~. ~ J $J '~ ^ CO n~,l b ^ N a O m i i a J 6 M H W M M • n 4 ~ J C ~ b LL= 1 I 1 1 1 I I I ; I 1 o .» e ~ N J b N i 1 I 1 I I • 6 p E a = p= o= a ~ .s 01 n ° a z ss a I o . E Q • . • i a n • a • a e _ ~ e° n 9 S = ~ a a _ ~ ~ „3 i s a' W W `Z IrA VI X W 'Original., Poor ~.:u.l•y V Q N C7 W N v O /~ lip W W _Q Q 2 W c WIC lV ~i L r N u o, • I ~, I _I i° xi i° yl ~ xi I . I x~ I ~ I N u y. ~ 1 j'j ~ I i i 1 1 I I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i i i fib .A ~ i i C ~ ~ u V ~ I I ~ ~ i _ N ~ ~~~ ~~ I i t0 I I 1 I ~ i N ~ 1 i 1 i 1 1 I ~I iCF M ~ I i ..~ ^^ ~~p G I u ' 1 1 i 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I li ~~, H ~ I ~ ~ i i _ '^ i_u ~ lau Y9 O I 1 I I 1 I - M _'~' 1 1 1 I - _- I __ 1 __ I I 1 -- I i I _-. I n = ;; - I'1 1 1 ; 1 I I 1 I~ i i ~ I _ ~ ~= I I is ~ I i ' I 1 M __ I I i = , I I 1 ' ~ i I I I i Q- - I 1 1 ~- ~ ~ P O _ Y Y ? Y _ S /1 C ~ r W Z N X W Original_Poor_ Quality W V a W a Vl F Z W 3 0 a N 0 N D Z Q J i ~= ". II .... ~ c ~ i to x i ~ ~o _, ; ! i I I . g ;~ I , ~ , '~ .. ~. ~. i ~ i i r i y :, I I I , : ~ _ Y• 'O I i I i I ga ~ » I ~ .~ I ~~ .. _. _ ... _,__, ~ ~ i i 3 I I Y ~ c s ~ I ~ I i ~ I N I I 1 i I I I N I ~ i i i ,~ ;Y i ~ + ' ~ 7 ~ II I 1 II I ~ i --. N i 1 I 1 1 ' I 1 M ~ I =° ~ ~ 1 I I I ~ M 1 i 1 I 1 1 I i I 6' I I I ~ I ~ ~ T :o j M I ~° ' I ~ i I I ~ I I ' Z f u I i I I . ~ ~ 1 I I I, ~ 9, _~ I a a 6 Y p n C r u. $ }. i W ~~11 Z i- X W Original Poor Quality W S U Q W a '2 V J W Q m 1 Q W O W V/ Q Z a J 5 d JI1 LL. 0 L J 6 M1 oI • 1 ~I " I LI O >< ~o i~ N i %I ZI I m I ^J1 r9 O' 9 V n ~ I I 1~ N I isr I = M NI Ni NI N ' i J ~ ~ ' m ,~ ~ . ~ i : ; _ i ~p T ~ O I ~ , , I e;~ I ; ~ >_ 1 1 1 1 i '•py~. M ~I M 1 M I I ,r. ~ ~ S I ~I ~I i 1~ o 1 ~ I ' ci I ' « mi w ~ w w w l ; l I ~ _ I i ~ ... i Y ±f f'1 M 1 Pf Pf '. > u 1'f Cil I 1"1 I M f~l •j N N N N N 1 II ~ ~ ! ._ T i T I T i q OI M M A M M f~i "' I M j M a l N N li ~I ~. i; I V < 1 N I 1~ Ul 1 I I M N N N 1 l y a i I i I ~~ II I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ 1 M MM M I M 1 ' 1 I ' ,z~~ I I I I I t I I I i i I I ~ ' n> I " N th ? ~ 1 DI I I P ~ O _ M • } 4 6 6 _ • ~ _ _ a ~ ~ 3 3 J W W ,~ v Z F N X W W Q U Q W d _H MZ V Z W Q a T W W N_ +~ i 6 6 Y W~ O LL J H 0 i J i d >< o C r1 N x i Original Poor Quality ,r •• N I n1 N 10 Y m • M N q I `O e I h 1 tf1 OI P 1 • tai I N M I Mi MI M M u ~.~. I.• so o ^ GO ~ Ep l0 O O1 1 O N' m ~~ OI Y 7 L ~ V ~ L G 1 • M . N .~_. MI M .__~ ~t. I ~ ~I I ~I ~ ~ • ~ °m o (~ I °m o m m I I N N M I N i_ N _ N !~ S 10 _ m 10 m l 10 I m b m b O] b q ~ Z M M M N M n1 ~ M I Nl r1 N n N M ~ M I s. _, ~ O Q~I I V M O N N I N n N N l[I 1 1 s` $ ~ 1 Y I M I M AI R! P1 M 1 i p. I Y I t :~ E .. N n v °I w i o i W se A O _ M 1 . ~ 6 G ~ d ~ M ~ a ~ 3 3 W W Z H N X W a a W a N 2 3 a N 1 Q T •i V i~ W W N d Z J s WP uW..: 0 lL ti H al i i 6 0 xI o 0 ti x 2 s 1 _...., I I N 11 N I iO N I~ ~ i r~ N I ~ J I 01 .b~pp I I I 4 i I f rn .O1 O O I p I M I p I M M( I i. I I I I ~ ~I i `~S , ' o ~ mi o c > e' > . y~ i I I _ ~ I ~ 9I ~p r ~ L L I ' o x~ :I n a N I M I M ~_ I~ I I I i ! ~ ~~ a~ I I I ~ ~ $ ; :s.i , - - I ` I N - If1l - 1!•I YI }I Yf 1 ~~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:i I ~+~~ ~I - N N - - ~=dl N n N ~O I C i u N I -6 i I N N N .•I I I .$I I I I I I I a~ `I I n I n n 1 n ~n I V V (`I 3 II 1 01 ~ . I 2 N I'1 Q Z u a I I[f O .7 ~~~ a ,. y 4 6 _ 6 y 4 ~ u N ~ .. ~ ~ 3 W W W Z N X W '~ri~;?~~t Pw`r ~u~li# Y . I ~ I P y 9 i ~1~ ~ m I fffu~~~''''~~~1 ul[ __ ~i ~i ~I PI nI r~ ~ N~1 ~~ NI I ~ ~ I o pl ~, ? ..II ti W ~ ~ _ hl ')I j I I{ d 1 4 ~ ~~ N~ BSI l'i ~ L I ~ I < 13F ~ PI lAI OI% G ~ 1 W W V d W a 3 C 0 1 N V I C Ci '' it I i i _! 'I~ X j O I ~ ~ ~ n 'I . ~~ ~ ~ ~5 _ c i a ~ ~ b C~ ~ I " CI 1 ~ ~ CI 1 ~ I I iii ~ I i . ~ ~ $I ~ I ° ~ ~ ~ ot i ~ ~ _ ~ I '~ N NI N 1 NI NI ~~ ' ~_ 6 _ ill ~._.. I I ~, i mo. 1 'I ~Ci I I n ~i PI In, N n ~ -. Li P i I NI ~ 41 4•7 ~ N i :Y ~ N i .r I ~ " 1 ~ n `_, 1 nl n n l rl i I I I I _ I ~ ~ I I n mi ~ _ ~ I N nI a O CI . ~~ a i r Q Il G _ 6 ~ h 3 - . t i' W {L 2 H N X W Original Poor Qu~l;ty ~ '1 ~ tG N O ~+ S ' ~ O ., . . M a ~ T N m "~ ` y y N N I N • N ~O O 07 N N ~ O J1 O W O m g o ti m ~ m <~ • ~ r1 N M 'a N y y N N N 1 • r r .+ in m m • T C~ EI N O 4 W e ~ rn < m ~o ~ ~ . 7 O m b N : m V N • N N 1/Y N N N W N N ' ~ O ~ m 7 • q' V C9 l(1 LL b t~l O 09 W Q ~ ~ ~ r n N N Z ~ $~ O . . ' O Q M ~ i Q ~ n rv ri N ~ J 6 N N N N N • N ~ r _ r ~ i ~ ~ i i i a ~ r I MM • ~ T Li. 1LL a > i i 6 N r E Q /}~ 6 V/ ~ ~ N l7 < mj ~ 10 ~ W e° ~ W da c p s e ~ . _ Q c ~ ~ s o 3 ~ = a n. a ~ o ~ ~ ~ : ~ W W ,W N O a ~. d A C7 O N Y ~~ W W H a n W •_ LL li O W LL 6 H G „I i ~~ x~ 0 y I ti XI z (~J(lyifl~l 1 50f ~i.fuiliy v t I ~ c. o I`LL ~ ~ ~r ~~~ N 4} r v ~ f ~° ~ N C ~._ 1 ~ I _ 6 > O ~ e r O ~ d 8 I a M _ _.. I - -- - I a ~_- o Y i-^I c I 0 ; L c ~ _ _ ...--- ---- ~'-- 3~ E e _ a ~o a I I ~ a 1 ~; ~ ~ "' I 6 G 2 _ E ~. a o I I I r-i P M Y M o M r ~ 6 p M V ~ o ~ s' 3 ~ y a W W {L 0 W N a a 'iT V WC d c~ z J J W O di N D 5 K W 6 11 W LWL Ii O W lL i O H I i v x Original Poor wa!;!Y N n Y4 ~ n 6 :V Vi u ^~ n ~~` i~ t` 101= .~ V} C'+ to°~ C lyw ~• .~ ~I v. - 1.•-"- C o ` -- - -- - > I~~ ' N G v . 1 --- ---- -- -- -- _o `` ~ f ~ 8 >i I I I I i I .o Y, °` ~ j I I 3 .o 0 `o ~ 6 6 s ~ w « A C- ~. 3 ~ W W 0 W N a a fJr;g;ra: ra;;::~ua;i, W V Q a N F '~ V W 3 0 m e W 3 O J H 7 Z J 6 a WIJ J.It 0 w a of ~ ~ N ~ V :v ~T c+ I 'Y.~ o V1 m m § ~: I LL; N ~ c m m ~ 6LL i ~ Y J M N ~~ N ~ ) N ~r ~ ~ I S" ~ N a s i c a l c c u •a a V S S .. M .. m H ~ __ I ' '-~ o O O ° O ° c c c c es M v ~ ~ M [1 v Ct v . .. ~ ~ ., ~i o S a c c i c o 0 LL I N N N. ~/} t? ~~ ~~ S S T N u'1 t~ N N 88' M N I N N ~ I I ~ I C I I e~ C I M M M M M _ ~ ti N M 1 e ~ ~/1 a 6 M V ~ 6 2 a = ~ - N i. 3 4 J W W LL W N a a pr6ginal Paor ~'~ai~~`Y W V a ~i W a N F 2 ,~ V J W Q a W YJ 5 x M Wlt W i~ 0 w H Y DI a J ~~ a~ ' O X ~ 0 ., x I ~, ~ I § ~ ( C ~ 67 LL i N n n v v>• u;~ u: us c~ n c I:° m ~ w ~ rn 7 ~' C c 7 S i Y O ^ 4 }1 v I v u> P. P. __ ~ C _ _ 0 0 0 p I " C >• 0 0 0 0 o c I," n n n n n n d' v ~7' ~T ~i 6 6 ti .. r'1 ~ rl ur u> ua co u~ O O O I U C O C O O O ~ C O I '+ c o c o c o I. V1 N ~l1 V1 Vl Ul ~ y N N N N N N I V} 4} _I V.~ ...--- V} -~- l/} --~ --- ~_ e n n O~ Y'1 N n 6 n• v J N n U5 u1 6I M N N N '-I rl iel n n n n n n da ~ ? ~ ~ y~ '+ N n ~' 1 I I a ~ G W ~ 'r a o 0 Y V n M ~ ~ u ~ ~ n ~ ~ W W W W N O a a ~c a W d F" W a N r 2 .~ W N_ Z 5 d O W J 1-~ o J r ~ C x ~ 0 yl x~ I _~ N ~p O O'J N ~ in O .p m ~ . r. n N m I v. w .~ v v ~ .Y m 'ice v c, 4 u u LL M ! a i n G C Y u P ^ ~ ~ IBP G V: I Y L ~ ~ ~ __._. v .. ~ _SQ n _ _~ I i ' ~ c o G ° ° c c c c ~ ~ C G C C i n s n n n :n a ~ v c:• .~ c: yr ar va ~^ I' oc c c c c _ >; 1 c c c o 0 =~ N ~ N N ~ 1~ n n n n 'a N N N N N ~ ~ y~ v.~ w v. y ~~° _ - ___~ _. _I -_ ___ I m ~" c' h N Nf ~ V N 1~ Vl ~ - o I N N N ~ J I I . I e o~ ~ n n n n m I `u ( ~I v C ~ N Ea Z ~ o ` v1 C Z a o Q ~ O n S ~ o a 4 ~ ~ = LL O 6 ~ z G w ~ s n ~ I W W W a O a pri~inal Poor ~ua1~ry W V Q W 6 J W 0 a N 2 W tlf O Z J s Wii O w J H 0 +~ i J t vl i d I x, o I O y r-q Z~ NI •:• O I ao1 1 y hi ~ O'. I I F ~ .y ~ ~ ... J' I ao l ~ ~p I 1 . U` 1 V'I N I GC ~I .+ ~ M~ M 1`l N N ~/' ~/' N V I ~/' 'I 1 I J 3] ~ I I G V' ~ _ L. L ' $ y I . ~ i .M I .'1 1 1 'I I N1I N Gi G ~ 1 WI ~ I x F I VI N H ~ i ~ N~ N N E 6~ G ~ ~ $ o c ^. o cl l c o c I !a l ! o l n ~, l i :n I c'~ c'1 ~ ~ I n V ~ V V I I N .ti ' i ~ I ~ I -~ 1 ... c c ~ ~ ~ _I_ c~ o l ~ I ~ I • cI o l c c I Y;~ I ( 1 I9y I j N N N I N N ~iI ~ m nt rt ~ n a ! i, 1 ' `~ I ~' t~1 1 ~ 1 Vl I N t"1 { ^° ' °.~ N I h y' I~ I ~ L N N N '-I I ~ L ' 6 1 i ~ ~ I ~ I ~ o ~I !, ._ I o I I t+l :'1 Cl C1 ~ ~ 1 I I l a I i ~ C T I :1 Z I 6 '. C N m I . I In C i I ~ ~ ~ i ~ o ~ ° _ _ _ . ~ . i ~ - ~ ~ 6 6 Y LL W W W N a a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE OCTOBER 30. 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS bBCTION PalfE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 II. VALUATION/INDEXES. 2 III. PARK DSVELOPMENT FEE MODEL 8 ZV. EXAMPLES 17 SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes a variety Punding sources to meet the revenue needs of a growing city. one source used by the Parks Division of the Community Development Department is the park development fee. The fee is a product of Ordinance No. 105 as amended and utilizes a formula in the calculation of the appropriate fee amount in any given situation. The Parks Division retained David M. Griffith & Associates to enhance the use of the development fee formula in two wave rn » n c~ rne_ n: .,. to beccer serve its citizens. First, the Yee formula was to be automated using LOTUS 123 software to allow faster responses to questions asked of staff working directly with the pu6lie. Second, since the formula can calculate a variety of scenarios from simple over the counter questions to complex development agreements, indexes to keep appropriate cost data current were desired. METHODOLOGY In order to understand the formula used 6y the City and some o£ its applications, existing documentation was reviewed. In addition, other cities and counties who utilize park development fees were contacted to gain insite into their process. Finally the local and regional chapters of the Building Industry Association (BIA) were contacted to see if they had any input they would like considered with respect to the current park fee. The HIA didn't have any significant comments but wanted to be advised of any major changes to fee computations. other cities and counties basically validate$ the approach taken by Rancho Cucamonga in valuing real estate and passed on some actual experiences with cost indexes. SUMMARY The project has resulted in the accomplishment of both goals originally sought by the Parks Division. 1) The fee formula has been automated using LOTUS 123 software (Ref. Section 3 for discussion). 2) The Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the west coast city of Los Angeles, as reported in the Engineering News-Record, was selected as the index to be used to update necessary cost components of the park fee formula. (Refer Section 2) The formula, as automated, provides the Division with a user friendly tool to quickly answer questions concerning park fees under a variety of scenarios. SECTION II VALUATION/INDEXES LAND VALUATIONS The Quimby Act allows local agencies to establish ordinances requiring residential subdivision developers to provide land or an in-lieu fee for park and recreation purposes. When in-lieu fees are the selected option, the determination of the fair market value of land for purposes of setting in-lieu fee amounts becomes an important step. Both the selection of land values and the timing of the selection must be considered. The timing is important because of the escalation in land prices that can occur as development begins to take place. The time between tentative Lar wa vi ~+rice, and land values should~be ^eatablished asy close yes possible to the filing of the final map. The identification of the fair market value of land being developed should be a structured but flexible process. The initial valuation of lend may be determined by agency staff using whatever resources are available to them. however, in the event the developer objects to such evaluation, he should ba allowed to obtain and submit an independent valuation through a qualified real estate appraiser. The City oL Rancho Cucamonga appears to have addressed the concerns of land valuation in Ordinance No. 105. Tae process outlined in Ordinancn No. 105 covers both timing and valuation options and no changes are recommended. COST INDEX In situations where park development costa nre desired as input to the model, the moat accurate approach is to survey current local costs. Rowevar, when recant cost data is unavailable or the City ie working under time constraints, a cost indexing approach may be used to estimate those costs in currant dollars with out performing a detnilad survey each time the acdel is run. The recommended approach is to establish a base cost through a review of current actual coats. The modal will then be updated annually using actual costa if available. In years when actual coats are not available ^8ngineerinq Naws-Record (ENR), Construction Coat Index for the City of Los Angelam" will be the index used to adjust the aodel. The Construction Cost Index (CCZ) was created to measure the combined effect of wage and price changes on construction. The index is a weighted-aggregate index of the prices of constant quantities of structural steel, Portland cement, lumber, and common labor. Tais hypothetical assortment of construction jtams vas valued at 5100.00 using 1913 prices. Tha selected materials govern price trends and continua as major cost factoss in building and construction. Graph 1 and Table 1 show the history oP the index at the national level since its inception. ~~m~, ~~~~ ~rnmo ~~ O ~, U~ W t ~ U (n c W w Za ~ M Zx W W Z W Z~ 'rt. V O Z v W Ni L D I t 1 ~~ Y OI n x ~ ~ ~ Q M N r ~rnn~n ~rnno _ U OC ~rnm~n ~ I w ~a(oo > (U U ~~~~ I --rn~no ~- o~ v ~n ~ ~~ O 0 0 ~wa~u~ W A Graph 1 3 _. ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD C.C.I. & B.C.I. COST INDEXES B.C.I C.C.I B.C.I C.C.I i PRD YEAR FACTOR %CHG FACTOR %CHG PRD YEAR FACTOR No CHG jFACTORI %CHG 1913 100 100 2 1914 92 -6.00% B9 -11. 3 1975 % 3.26% 93 4.4 4 1916 131 37.8996 130 39. 5 1917 167 27.48% 187 39. 8 7918 i5B -4.79% 189 4,d 8 1920 207 30.1916 251 26. / 9 1921 768 -19.61% 202 -19.5 6 10 1922 155 -6.63% 174 -13 8 9 11 1923 186 20.00% 214 22 12 1924 1% 0.00% 215 0.4 73 1925 183 -7.61% 207 -3. it 1926 165 1.0916 208 0. 15 1927 166 0.54% 208 -0. i6 1928 166 7.0896 207 0.4 17 1929 191 1.8096 207 0. i6 1930 165 -3.74% 203 -1.93 19 1931 168 -9.19% 181 -10.84 20 1932 131 -22.02% 157 -13.26 21 1933 148 12.99% 170 8. 22 1934 167 12.64% 196 16.4 23 1935 766 -0.6096 1% -1.01 ~ 2a 1936 172 3.61% 206 5.7 25 1937 1% 13.%% 235 14.08 26 1936 197 0.51 % 236 0.4 27 1939 197 0.00% 236 0. . 28 1960 203 3.05% 262 2.54 29 1941 271 3.91% 258 6.61 30 1942 222 5.21% 276 6.% 31 1943 229 3.75% 290 5.0 32 1944 235 2.62% 299 3.1 33 1945 239 1,70% 308 3.01 34 1946 282 9.62% 346 12.34 35 190 313 19.47% 113 19. 36 1948 345 10.22% 4fi1 17, 37 1909 352 2.03% 177 3,6 38 1%0 375 6.53% 510 6.9 39 1951 401 6.93% Sd3 6.4 C.C.I. ~ CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX B.C.I. ~ BUILDING CO5i INDIX 40 1952 616 3J6% a"°9 4J9%~ 41 1%3 437 3,61% 600 S 45°'~ 62 1954 646 3.48% 628 4.6%9W 43 7955 469 5.16% 660 5.f0°.6~ dd 1958 491 4.69% 692 4.85 a5 1%7 509 3.67% ]24 d.6291~ ~Ytltl Jp 4.14% /S9 4.83911 R 1%9 548 6.36% 79] 5.019t~ 48 1960 559 2.07% 824 3.3 69 i%i 568 1.51% 947 2. 50 1962 580 2.17% 872 2.95 51 1963 594 2.41% 901 3.33 52 1961 612 3.03% 936 3.88 63 1965 627 2.65% 971 37491 54 1966 850 3.67% 1019 4.96 55 1%7 878 4.00% 1,074 5409 56 1988 721 6.66% 1,155 7.54``~~ 57 1989 790 9.5]% 1269 9.871({ 58 1970 836 5.62% t 781 8.83u"I1 59 1971 908 13.40% t 581 14 48°h 9 80 1972 1,046 10.55% 1,753 10.88 81 1973 1,138 8.59% 1,895 B. t09f~ 82 197f 1,205 5.89% 2,920 6.60961 63 1975 1,306 6.38% 2,212 9.500.6.,' 64 1976 t 625 9.11% 2,401 8.54°/° 65 1977 1,545 8.42% 2.576 7.29%i 55 ts7e :.e74 3.3s% z,776 ].76%i 67 1979 1,819 8.66% 3 J03 9.18%j 68 1980 1,941 6.71% 3,237 ]79°bl 69 1%1 2,097 8.04% 3,535 9.21% 70 1982 2,225 6.10% 3,825 62096` 71 1983 2,386 7.15% 4,066 6.30°.W 72 1984 2,417 1.38% 6,146 L9791 73 1985 2,428 O.dR% 6,195 1.1896] 74 1966 2,483 2.27% 4,295 2.385U 75 1987 2,541 2.36% 4,406 2.SB 76 1988 2,598 2.26% 4,519 2.56 77 1989 2,660 1.62% 4,60fi 7.93 Table 1 4 The ENR also produces its CCI for twenty cities aoross tie United states. The City indexes are compiled in the same manner as the U S index only using data local to each city. on the west coast, Los Angeles and San Francisco indexes are computed. It is recommended that the Los Angeles index be used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The history of the Los Angeles index since 1966 index is shown on Graph 2 and Table 2. An annual update of cost data within the model should be sufficient. In the event more current updates are desired, the ENR publishes index changes monthly in the first issue of each month. The annual average is a straight mathematical average of the monthly indexes. 0 U W ~h w (n J C7 WZ Z< ~o Z -+ ~ C3 W U Z C7 Z W ~ ~ ~ ~ in o ~ o N N ~ ~ r z w U W d O N Graph 2 ~ ~ N O Q~ m O W O a W ~> ~o 0 rp 0 v~ N m iR O 6 7/' 7R ae h O ~ r r NEERING NEWS RECORD C.C.I. LOS ANGELES wo PERIOD YEAR C.C.I CHANGE t 7966 1,125 2 1987 1,203 7.0% 3 1969 1,276 5.9% 4 1968 7,309 27% s 1970 1,462 laT% 6 1971 1.ra u.o% 7 1972 1,866 16.4% B 1973 2.099 6.8% 9 1974 2,260 8.6% 10 1976 TS86 13.4% H 1976 2,923 13.0% 72 1977 3,162 8.2% 19 1978 3.21 8.2% 14 1979 3,839 6.1% 15 1980 4,102 12.7% 16 1981 4,631 10.4% t7 1982 4,934 8.9% 18 1983 6,064 2.6% 19 1984 6,260 3.9% 20 1985 6,447 3.6% 2 19do 6.452 0.1% 22 198) 5,474 0.4% T 1988 5,771 5.4% 2d 1989 6,790 p.3% d> i9F0 ~~~~~ 3 >`% Table 2 SECTION III PARK DEVELOPMENT FEE MODEL PURPOSE The park development fee model is an automated version of the park development fee formula currently being used by the City. The formula was automated in order to allow a broader range of city staff to answer fee questions quickly and accurately. The model provides cost information for several products types by land use type. STRUCTURE The park development fee model was created using "LOTUS 127" and "ALWAYS" software and may be run on any IBM compatible personal computer supporting these software packages. The model was designed to be user friendly in that it requires minimal input and key strokes to complete its task. The following discussion reviews the workings of the model. USING THE MODEL INPUT First, the model requires the user to select the land use type being developed. This is accomplished by inputing a number corresponding to the desired land use type; Land Use Twe 1 - Very low 2 - Low 3 - Low -Medium 4 - Medium 5 - Medium - High 6 - High The model can only analyze one land use type at a time. Second, the model requires the user to input the number of units of each product type to be built. Product Tvoe Single Family Duplex Triplex Fourplex Multiple 5-9 Multiple 10+ Mobil Home 8 The "land use type" and "units by product type" are the only input required tc rur. the nodel. AE this ~^~ the ..^,cdal tan be p^_:.._ run cr, i£ necessary, certain factors contained within the model can be adjusted as discussed in the MAINTENANCE part of this report. FACTORS The model contains certain information that does not change frequently and is required for computations. Given Information o Park Acres Required per 1000 population o population per product type (dwelling unit) o Land Value per acre per land use type o Park development cost per acre Any of the factors contained in the model can be updated (Ref. maintenance - page 10). u0 TPOT Given the above, the model is able to calculate and print out the desired land value, park cost, or both for each product type by land use type. Zt also totals all costs by land use type, OPERATION step 1. To operate the model, the user needs to turn on the PC and access the LOTUS software. The "ALWAYS" software will automatically be activated. Step 2, o Retrieve the "fee" file (/,F,R, FEE o When the fee file is retrieved the cursor should appear in cell A-1. Zf this is not the case, press the "home" key to correctly position the data input screen. You may proceed to step 7 without positioning the screen if you wish. Memo: LOTUS is a menu driven spreadsheet package where each keystroke inputs data or a command. The LOTUS pankage allows several sequential keystrokes to be combined into cne command. This combining of keystrokes is called a "MACRO". The Fee model uses two macros. The first to move the cursor to the appropriate spots for data entry, and the second to print the completed reports. 9 step 3. initiate the lirst macro to position the cursor for data entry. (Alt, D) Depress the "Alt" rey and the "D" kep 3t the same +.iae. etap 4. o Enter the number corresponding to the desired land use type. o Press enter. step S. o Enter the number of units to be constructed for each product type. o Press enter to bypass product types not used. Step 6. After units for all product types have been entered, initiate the second macro to print the report (Alt. A?- Depress the "cif" °c, -r,,, t.," -H:: Key at the same time. Memo o The report may be printed as many times as desired by repressing "Alt A". o However, if "Alt D" is pressed to reposition the cursor, all data input fields will be set to o. o If you wish to change the land use type or number of units for a product type without erasing the data input fields, use the arrow keys to reposition the cursor where the change is needed and simply Type the new number over the old number. Xou may then press Alt A, from any location, to print. All of the formulas, formatting, and macros are write protected (ie. you cannot change them). Maintenance refers to the changing or updating of factors internal to the model which are used in computations. Memo The LOTUS worksheet upon which the model was written contains three tables positioned as shown on Figure 1. The first table in the upper left corner of the Worksheet is for data entry as previously discussed. The second table in the center of the LOTUS worksheet is for factors used in computations. The third table in the lower right corner of the LOTUS worksheet is used fur printing the reports. There is no need to change any information on the third table so it is completely write protected. Step 1. After retrieving the "fee" Pile use the arrow keys to move the cursor so that cell 5-22 is in the top left hand of the screen. This should expose the center table of the LOTUS worksheet. The center table is the one that contains factors for Acres/1000, Pop/D.U., Land Value, and Park DeV. Cost. Any of these factors 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCbMGNGA PARK AND RECREATION FEE COMPUTATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW -- INPUT SCREEN o Alt'O• Inillates Input Screen o Load Land Use Type o Load Product Vdume by Type o AN •A• Pdnla Report -- FACTORS o Update Factors o Nolnput Required NOTES: t) The entire worbheel is write prdedetl a><cept for data input ar chanpeabte lector spazes. ~ Mazro'S Chit run the inpN screen and Drint the reports afe IDCaletl IO the right of the input screen. 3) SBVeral titles used while Printing reports are located to the left of the report lormat. Figure 1 it may be changed or updats3 by simply typing the rew number over the existing num~bar and pressing enter. Non data fields ate write protected. step Z. Changes may be saved using standard LOTUS save commands as revisions to the existing fee file or as a new file under a new name. Exiting the model is accomplished in the same manner as exiting any LOTUS file. Step 1. Save the worxinq ree rile ii yuu Luvo Yarfo.-Wa~ maintenance you want to save. (Either as a revision of the current file or as a new file.) o Press the Home Rey o Save the ~yrrent file (/, P, B, e+, R) Step 2. Exit IATUS (/,Q,Y,E) 12 SECTION IV EXAMPtES Request for cost on Land Use Type 1, including park development cost, where ono single family unit will be constructed. Step 1. Access LoTUs Step 2. (/,F.R, Fee, •+) Btep 3. (7131 i D) Btep ~. (i,d) 8tsp 5. (i,~,~,~, ~, e+, r+. ~) Step 6. (1111 i 71) BXZT 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION FEE IN LIEU COMPUTATION LAND USE TYPE : r- 1 ~ VERY LOW 1) VERV lOW (c 2 dwelling units Der acre) 2) LOW 3) LOW -MEDIUM {) MEDIUM 6) MEDIUM -HIGH 61 Hlr:u PRODUCT NEW ACRES( POP. LAND VALUE PARK DEV. TOTAL UNIT TYPE ~ UNITS 11000 ~ ID. U. I PER ACRE PER ACRE FEE I FEE SINGLE FAMILV 1.00 3.00 3.43 513,067 580,000 51,266.26 51,266.26 DUPLEX TRIPLEX FOURPLF~( MULTIPLE 6 - 9 ( MULTIPLE 10. ` ( MOBILE HOME SECTIORi CV EXAMPLES 8:emnle 2 Request for cost on Land Use Type 2, including park development cost, where one single family unit will be constructed. __ Step _ 1. _ Access LOTUS Step z. (/,H,A,Hee, ~,J) etep 3. (711t i D) step ~. (2, N) step 5. (1, .e, a+, N,e~,N,s~,l~) etep 6. (Alt 4 ]1) step 1. (/,4, Y, E) 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION FEE IN LIEU COMPUTATION LAND USE TYPE : ~2, LOW 1) VERV LOW (2 - a dwelllny unlls per acre) 2) LOW 3) LOW -MEDIUM a) MEDIUM 6) MEDIUM -HIGH oj'niun PRODUCT NEW ACRES POP. LAND VALUE PARK DEV. TOTAL UNlT TYPE UNITS I !1000 I /D.U. I PER ACRE I PER ACRE FEE I FEE SINGLE FAMILY 1.00 9.00 8.19 572,22 580,000 51,566.57 31,566.57 DUPLE% I TRIPLE% I FOURPLE% MDLTIPLE 5 - 9 MUL"NPLE 10. I MOBILE HOME SECTION IV EXAMPLES Exemol• 3 Request for cost on Land Use Type 3, including park development cost, where one single family unit, two duplex units, three triplex units, four fourplex units, and eight multiple 5-9 units will be constructed. Lead Btep Dee 1. T9De 3 Access LOTUS Step z. (/,l,R, lee, ~ ) etep 3. (1111 i D) step t. (3,~ ) Step 5. (1, e1 ,2, e1,3, ~,i, x.1,8, l1, li,r~) Btep 6. (Alt i A) E% step i. (/,4,x,E) 1' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION FEE IN LIEU COMPUTATION LAND USE TYPE : (- 3 I LOW -MEDIUM 1) VERY LOW (/ _ 8 dwelling units 001 acre) 2) LOW 3) LOW -MEDIUM q MEDIUM 5) MEDIUM - HIGN .~ ~ w.. PRODUCT NEW ACRES POP. LAND VALUE PARK DEV. TOTAL I UNIT TYPE UNITS /1000 /D.U. PER ACRE I PER ACRE FEE FEE SINGLE FAMILY 1.00 3.00 3.13 191,233 880,000 51,761.99 st.761,99 DUPLIX 200 3.OC 213 181 SJ3 880,000 82,196.58 81.2{8.29 TiBPLIX 3.00 3.00 229 (91.233 180,000 13,529,11 51,176.37 FOURPLIX 1.00 300 275 f97,233 f80,000 15,660.69 51.612.67 MULTIPLE 5 - 9 8.00 3.00 1.52 191.233 180.000 16.218.58 5780.82 MULTIPLE 1M 1 MOBILE HOME ~ TOTAL 819,684.95 Example 3 i8 SECTION IV EXAMPLES - $YeADl• ~ Request for cost on Land Use Type 4, including park develDpment cost, where one single family unit, two duplex units, three triplex units, four fourplex units, nine multiple 5-9 units, and fourteen multiple 10+ units will be constructed. OPERATION etap 1. Access LOTUS Step 2. (/,T,R,Pae, ~ ) Btep 3. (Alt f D) step ~. (4,~ ) step 5. (1. l~,2. t1,3,f),{. ~1 ,9, 11 ,1{, !~ gel) Step 6. (Alt 4 A) ERj_ Step 1. (/,4,Y,$) 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCaA PAR K AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION FEE IN LIEU COMPUTATION LANG USE TYPE : ~~ MEDIUM 1) VERY lOW (8 - 14 tlwWlinq units per acre) 2) LOW 3) LOW -MEDIUM 4) MEDIUM 5) MEUIUM -HIGH PRODUCT NEW ACREB POP. LAND VALUE PARK DEV. TOTAL UNIT TYPE UNITS 17000 /D.U. PER ACRE PER ACRE FEE FEE SINGLE FAMILY 1.OD 3.00 3A3 5131,678 580,000 52,17&77 52,178.17 DUPLEX 2.00 3.00 2.43 5137,678 580.000 f3.086.27 51.543.13 TRIPLEX 3.00 3.00 229 f131,678 580.000 5{.362.68 51,45s.23 FOURPLEX 6.00 3.00 2.75 5131,676 580.000 56.985.37 51,7x6.34 MULTIPLE 5 - 9 9.00 3.00 1.52 5131,678 580.000 58.687.27 t965.25 MULTIPLE 10. 1x.00 3.00 1.53 f131.678 580,000 313,602.63 5971.60 ( MOBILE HOME TOTAL 538,902.18 Example 4 20 SECTION IV EXAMPLES gxamol• 5 Request for cost on Land Use Type 5, including park development cost, where two duplex units, two duplex units, three triplex units, four fourplex units, nine multiple 5-9 units, and twenty four multiple 30+ units will be constructed. Aaad Dae Tyoe S step 1. Access IATUs step ~. (/,p, R,PN,~ ) Step a. (Alt i D) step a. (5,~ ) etep 5. (}~l,r, N,3,N,4, 1~,9, e~,2a, ar, e~) Step 6. (Alt f A) I step 1. (/,4.Y,$) 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION FEE IN LIEU COMPUTATION LAND USE TYPE : ~~ MEDIUM -HIGH t) VERY LOW (id - 26 dwelling unila Par acre) 2) LOW 3) LOW -MEDIUM 1) MEDIUM 5) MEDIUM -HIGH 8) HIGH PRODUCT TYPE NEW UNITS ACRES /1000 I POP. ID.U. LANG VALUE PER ACRE PARK OEV. PER ACRE I TOTAL FEE I UNIT FEE SINGLE FAMILV DUPLEX 2.00 3.00 243 5152,305 580,000 53,367.01 51,693.50 TRIPLE% 3.00 3.00 229 5152,305 580,000 54,787.81 51,595.94 FOURPLEX 4.00 3.00 2.75 5152.305 SBO.OOD f7,666.07 51,916.53 MU! TIPLE 5 - 9 9.00 3.00 1.52 5152,305 580,000 59.533.80 31,059.31 MULTIPLE IM 24.00 3.00 1.53 2152,305 f80,000 525.59072 51,066.28 , ( MOBILE HOME TOTAL 550,965.39 Example 5 22 SECTION IV EXAMPLES 8xe~nle e Request for cost on Land Use Type 6, including park development cost, where two duplex units, three triplex units, four fourplex units, nine multiple 5-9 units, and thirty multiple l0+ units will be constructed. Step 1. Access LOTUS Step 2. (/,l,R,1ee, ~ ) etep 3. (Alt i D) step f. (6, ~7) Step 5. (1, N,2, e~, 3, N,~, fJ, 9, 1/,3o, d,f1) etep 6. (Alt L A) sxx 23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION FEE IN LIEU COMPUTATION LAND USE TYPE : ~~ HIGH 1) VERY LOW (24 - 30 Ewellin9 units per acre) 2) lOW 3) LOW -MEDIUM 4) MEDUM 5) MEDIUM -HIGH e) MIGM I PROD ECT UNITS /1000 /D.U. I PER ACREE PER ACRE TFOEEL FEE I S NGLE FAMILY DUPLE% 200 3.00 2.43 5211,000 580,000 5{.T{2.76 32.121.39 TRIPLFJ! 3.00 3.00 229 5211,000 580,000 56,997.51 31,999.17 FOURPLE% 4.00 3.00 276 5211,000 380,000 59.603.00 32,400.75 MULTIPLE 6 - 9 9.00 3.00 1.62 3211,000 380,000 511,94264 51,326.96 MULTPLE 10. 30.00 3.00 1.63 52N,000 580,000 540,070.70 31,335.69 I MOBILE HOME I TOTAL 571,856.63 Example 6 24 lzm~ C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Ntaus Procedure Description Prepared for: City or Rancho Cunmoogn Prepared by. Anson-Faust Associates 2020 N. Tustin Avenue Santa Ana. California 92701 March 7, 1991 con~r~'s Page Background .................................................1 Gvetview ...................................................t Na.... i.w....y__.._. n__ . 2 __..~... ~........ ...jyou~ ............... .... ...... ... ........ Coat Allocation ...............................................2 Appendices: A: Nexus Tmrtaportatioo Improveroenta B: TratLc Share Derivation Procedure LIST dF FIGURES-AND TABLES FICURFs t Nesru Sub-Arena ............................................. 5 A-1 Link Imprrnerorots For Regional, Sub-Regioosl, end City Backbone Impnwemrnta A-2 Link Improvements for Railroad Crossing Improvements H-1 Traffic Share Trip Types TAHLES 1 City of Rancbo Cucamonga Backbone Concept ........................ 3 2 Iand Uae Corresporukna and EDU Rates ........................... 6 3 Fee Rate Summaries ........................................... 7 A-1 Transportation Improvement Costs A-2 Summary of Link Cost Allocations ii City of Rancho Cucamonga NEXUS PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION This report describes the nexus procedure devxbped as part of the Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Tratlic Malysis. The nexus procedure forms the technical basis for the financing program developed by the city for implementing future transportation improvements. BACKGROUND The Cuture circulation system in the City nr A=...~!... i`___-,~,,-,6;, ;,,,,iwirv many neW tactlnies and improvements to existing facilities. Some of these will be built by adjacent deveopment, while others are calegorved az "otF-site" end will be furaled by a combination of deveopment fees and development mitigation meazures. The program m fund these off-site Future iranaportation improvements is based on a nexus concept, which equatrs the costs allocated to new deveopment to the benefits received, The nexus procedure determines a fair share financial obtigatian for arty new development in any part of the city, thereby assuring equitable and orderly development of the city's circulation system. The material presented in the report discuses the nexus procedure, and summarizes the related cost shares based on current cost estimates for the transportation improvements included in the nexus program. OVERVIEW The City of Rancho Cucamonga nexus procedure provides the bazis for a wmprehensive program of traffic improvements and a related funding and implementation program. Tha nexus procedure relates new development in various parts of the city ro needed transportation improvements, It tabulates a!! trips that will be generated by new development, and then summarizes the number of trips on each roadway link that is to be improved Hence, the exults show the "nexus" between each roadway improvement end the geographic areas mntnbuting to the need for that improvement or benefiting from that improvement. The i_mpkmensstix part of iho a~ar;s projfrnm aL'uwua specific improvement projects to individual devebpment applications. This is carried out on an ongoing basis, the projcess being allocated according to overall need and relationship to the projeet. ToW dollar amount of the identified improvement(s) will generally not exceed that determined from the nexuu formula. For a small project, an in•lieu tee may be all that is required, and for larger developments where the identified improvement projects imohe leas cost than the nexus formula, the difference is made up with a residual fee. The program allows For reimbursement agreements in cases where the casts of the identified improvements are greater than the nexus fee. NFYIiC rMROr1VC~~cwn nn~no... The transportation improvemenss included in the nexus program have four components az follows: A Strata and Bridges 49,530,000 B. Radtoad Ctrasinga 28,570,000 C Traffic Signals 18460000 D. Emergency Vehicle Preemption 8ti0,000 Torwf, s97,aze,ooo Components A through C are actually all part of what u referred to az the city backbone system, and the city's backbone concept is described in Table 1. Items A and H are allocated on a traffic share bazis. with higher costs being elloce!ed to those areas which will derivz the grenies[ benefits From the improvements. The tratTic signal component inwlves installation, upgrades, and coordination, and is allocated citywide on an equal share basis. Similarty, the emergemy vehicle preemption component is allocated citywide on an equal share basis. Appendu A contaim a detailed listing of the individual projects wnsidered in the nexus program, including cost estimates for each. COST Ar.t.nr•ATION A detailed description of the traffic share procedure can be found in Appendix B. It is part of the city's Iratfic model system, and provides an equitable bass for alloraling improvement bbY 1 _ CITY OF RANCHO NCAMONOA BACI®ONe CONCPPT A FRLW SYSllihl 'me CYYa huda,an ehmWhla pr (yaxal pae + apxl& m airy pram) r PxYRY BsYhM. Flu-m Y deGOed r wl partYa a the pYa em dx ReYhed a mmuu[md ahhY Iha city Reua a. Txe enca~oNe of ~Ittfe FRi,w srsleM 1bt bweme d ale .110 r uIC um®.m .ulh Imxy b ammmm.m Ih! mM of D7.fly inm[ .1 Ix IIIOC d mellrllclioo om Y deRmO m foRona 1. DYHW Major AlterW SIIeeI: a. 7bC hQEOm (Of IhY aa/aY w6 mmYl Of IaU IM'1 Yem m mrJ am In ~ mmo Nm. Is mYOC aaae ~ l! lael lb RK owl0e hm Y U fal, n 11x the IoIY lxdlh M Wa harlhem Y 1I feel pN We seam MdIL b. At Ie~ldaa'~'*~" the bribooe ahui nmW d WIWY pmae4k deip - inrhun curb itld b the BCRa and erns nd mllvpaldip(rybbf- ~ Aar InfRt aipu u ae Ylaamim Wx Y aeedd by dry buRdwl ahaR 4 mtltle0 Y Ih badhom ayaleav d. Wbve Ile xntl same Reed. uairy oolli0aa RR eealiaµ a blidee, NN ei(q~brry and Yrpowmem aiMh IhaY be naLL 2 Major ad $avo0uy Ar1uY1 Slmaa: a. M baehhom (m Ub mlgay ahaR mit of me Intl Yoe Y ear8 dimgiae am Re k!1 tme Yad Fxh Intl Yma 11 feel W de Yf1 tam Yrc Y 10 kel, n wl the IaW rr{Ah of IhY bads bon's 39 (aL b. N YIelYtllgll Ibe Earhboee ahaR mrW of Wlmule heomalic deign . Ydude neb I.du b the RCRS am erns aed u.lmpom;o~ 11(hIN m• c Aey 4aD-e aipul al m minamioo wl Y meld by ulY buiWoul wR be mtluded Y Ile batlmme ayxem. 6 Whore We ellea aaRa Rood, miRry QIIId01a. RR nmainp, a blidyel IWI li6htaf-wey aed Impwemml wuh aBW he med. e Whem IhY xlad algay Ytlode • era0lm (mliae mmmuxry am rpedRc pYm all fmaeh eroraatiomJ, the backbae ahul bemme one Intl bn b each Nleniae plm Ne subs fa Re raadian. The width of Oe hackhoer ahxl br 7A fad plm the oledod ~. Colkaa smal. (NOrE: Ass tmabml odkcldr ilex wI aaY he Yaean m Ins sal mtYUm wR rK upQWei to mllona a1K1 wim in Ue Cvmblioa PYo of the ary Geoenl Plan.) a. aVhee lbe ales rlolw Rood, utiY4 rorlldela, RR rnmYp, a blidpa, fWl IidhlN-wry am hnpmemol width aha0 be „led. b. AoY W(Y aipW x m Yteneaioe wl Y aerded by ory buildael ahW be mgWd m the 6arhbme ryalem 0. The bxibne wI0 IetlWe aaaW and axMner atlas NETWORK 77tAFFIC SIGNAL COORDRVATION SY57EM. 3 costa according to geogrsphic area. - l:tgurc I shows the set of sub-arena defined for the nexus program. Within each area, the allocated tort per unit of development is the same, I)itfercncea between areas rcfiect the amount that each area contributes ro the need for the identified trer~apottation improvements. To calculate nexus fee obligations, use h made of the 'equivalent dwelling unit' (EDU) measure. This covverta aU Iand use units into av equivakvt F.DU unit. avd thereby enables nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per FDU. Table 2 shows av example of the currently proposed htJU equrvakncies, and Table 3 slaws the mrreapovding IDU natus reran Cor the S97 million trevaportation improvement program. As noted in the Appendbc B discruslon, the nenas reta include an adjustment of cleae to 20 percent iv converting from the ADT rates derived from the trefiic shares ro the EDU retes presented here. This accounts for land vas that may be exempt (i.e., schools) but which generate trips, development orcurting since the 1989 land use data base arW the nexus program implementation, and the use of buildout rather than horimn year forecasts in the traffic nwdel. 4 M •.~ MP 9 6 2 ~,aa ~ ,~,', '. .l9 "~H~n n ~~ pl:., u~~~~el na ~~ ~~,I `<>4 W 0 8 7 - MITERSTATE 10 ~ CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY LJMT$ • • ~ • • CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq SPFfRE OF INFUIENCE ~~~AI/.f7/M~fd(/S7 ASSOC/A~/NQ 5 Figure NEXUS SUB-AREAS Table 2 AND EDU RATPS R_CIM LSND USB 7'YP 1 uYR 7R@ I~FALTOR 1. Siege-Fm0y Duube0 1. RdWOliol (SFD) DU 13.00 1.0 2 Alullmmt 2 RewMU0el (b4) DV 6,10 .6 3. Coo0ommiom 2 Reuidtalil (MF) DV 5.86 .6 3. E16elyMefvmmt 2 Re0inW1 (~ DU 3.30 6 6. Gcmul Oemmvtil 3. Caemutil TSF 1730 IS 7. Re0imel CmunaW 3. Coaspdol 75F 31.10 IS e Comsmiry ~MtlY 3 Ca~medul 7SF 5285 IS 9. Neipibubod Comsadol 3. Casoenu6l TSF 8130 13 10 nv...:~~ r =- _.-' . ~vu '19F tl7.90 IS 11. RHMUaoI 3. Cammpool TSF 95,62 IS 12 Ful Fa06 RaYnmpl 7, CaWfdJ 7SP 67213 IS I]. FideUMdd a OOUr ROOM 10.19 8 l4. Ollbe (U99 TSF) /. OffbOBS PM 73F 1811 L2 13. O(Boe (100 7SF +) 1. OmWBUt Pule TSF 1203 13 16 blediW 0(71¢ /. Of8o011u Pnk 1SF 71.17 13 17. Govavuml OIBtt 1. OmouBw PaR 7SF 6893 13 t0. Offim Pule 1. 51~ Put TSF 17.10 1.1 19. Buuos Perk /, OBkyBV Prt 7SF 1212 13 NI. l+etl loduwul ]. 0u19utlo1 7SF 6.97 .b 21. Wueboue S. 1061YIIYI 13F IA8 b 22 EkemUry/Md01e SIOO91 Esuq Sill 1.07 - 23. Hi0b Sebool E~ b'il) 1]9 - 2/. Co0e0e Psmq SN ISS - u. Dy ru a fiber sn7 3.]5 z5 76. HolpiW a fibs BED 11.73 .9 27. NuoioB/Cmpepte GLe a fiber BED 260 .2 26 7Witu 6. dha SEAT 1.76 .IS 29. Hnllb Oub 3 CammeerW 7SF ]3.91 IS 30. Library F~q 7SF 1330 - 31. Pou OIEOe 3 Coumutlol 7SF o67P IS 32 ~uneq 3 Cammee9l 13F 36.17 IS Sl. Auto Sla/Repeir 7 Cammeldel TSF 1732 IS 3/. Seevia Slalioo a dnQ Pl1MP I3A00 102 33. Cu WUB a fiber SIAIJ. 10860 BJ 36. Burt 3. CosmMLl TSF 789.95 1S P. Cburtb Psupl ilF 7.70 - 3B SeBSlarge 6 dhr UNIT 38 .92 39. Gaff Coulee a fiber AIXE 6V .65 w. Put Draq ACRE 166 - 11. Apieullurt Eaemq ACRE .10 - 12 Couvry la0 Eauq BED .92 - 43. Squu Camilla F~q ACRE 50.00 - DU - Dumlio6 UNI SFD -Slope-FUOBy DNUbM MF - Md4-FuoBy TSF - ThouwOd 3quue FeH S7U . Slodem 6 Ta0k 1 PEB RAZE SUMMARNS EDU RATES BY COST COMPONEM' COST' DOf1AR5 PER EDU BY SIJB-AREA ARP.AWIDE VQMPONENT 1 2 3 • 5 6 ] R 9 AVERAGE Slmda a06 B1i00a BOS 175 37 793 271 896 80! 1,163 ;186 736 Raihoad Qotlop 361 169 6'Ie 16.7 298 91 312 1A1 91 176 TmO3e SipuY 7SL 7ffi 293 182 ]%! 262 1ffi 7ffi 7ffi 262 EV Pmomµieo l7 13 IS 13 11 IJ 13 11 17 13 TOTAL 1,161 1.]89 1.030 1350 B2A I.1d8 1.612 2MI ] Sn ~ Ier L1ND USB RATES (TOTAL • "~'/ LAND USE DOIJ .ne PER LAND USE GTEGOR Y UNR B5' SUB -AREA - AREAVADE CATEGORY IINR 1 2 3 1 5 6 ] R 9 AVERAGE RelidmlW (SFD) DU 1,161 1,989 1,030 1,350 B21 1,788 1,612 2001 2372 1,181 ftelideo0al (MF) DU 877 1.073 618 930 191 T13 9BS 1,2% 1,517 893 Cammacal 75F 3,192 ;681 15{5 7aII 1,7]6 1.972 2,•67 7.002 3,838 2271 ODkeIBw Peek TSP 1,937 2U] 1,216 1,860 9B9 1.516 1,970 2107 .4086 l,]B/ ledu14ia1 TSF 877 1.0n 618 930 191 T13 985 I,I01 1,313 B93 [DVAAND USE UNR EpUNAIF.NIS LAND VSE TYPE UNIT EDU FACTOR Reaide01ia1 (SFD) DU t.0 Rmidmiul (MF) DU .6 CooJmemial 'ISF IS ORioNBUei0m Park TSF 1.2 lodulrial 7SF .6 Spatial Caao< Hdd/MoW Room 8 Dal am AYdml .ss HopiW Bed .9 NmainyCn9peple Cam Bd 2 Tbeum Stll .13 Servim Slalion Pomp 102 Car Wub Slall 83 ScHSlom0e url .m cdr coum Aae .6s DU . D1re0m0 Util SFD - Sio01e-Fwity Delatlrd MF ~ M9M1-Fam0y TSF . TLomaod Sgwrt Frod APPENDI%A NE%US TRANSPORTATION RYIPItUVEMENTS 7be aezu transportation improvemeab ere summarized is Table A•1. Each prgject is desigmted Dither u Regional, Sub-Regional, City Backboae or Itailroed Crossing. Far share ellaation purposes, a set dnet links ere defined, u shown in Figures A-1 and A-Z 1kaA9a on each d tkeae links is tabuLted in the modeSm gut d the neav precedme fnpmvide rho neoeseny geographic t<a~c share oars. 1Llde.42 ehowebow the asaeposbtion impsovementoosbare allcrated m tbese Bake. For thin ztady, "ItegiomP and Bub-Regional' mob have been celauLted end disfrgfuted. 11fis eras dome to esbblish these oosrs forremrd purposes and fo Lave a basis for pos®ble future use Nfundingfor projects aurL u the Route 90 fifaewgy Lrvolvee Ibis source. Fees wlmlated in thb report include m Regional projects and only those Sub• Regional paojecb eatire~y within fife Gtiq dR®cho Ctramaaga Tibk Ad TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMFNf COSTS DFSCRIPT7ON CO (OOhI DE410NATION LINK REFERENCES 1. Reeim ul. SutrRetbml. and CiN Backbone la. Rte. 30 ComUYGi0v 41,710 Rey I6 tb. Rte. 30 Rightd-Wry 9,180 Rq. 1S .~. n,c .r mtvwgo o,xv nq. ~-1< h 1-IS 6N St. Inlembnge lbmuumipp 12,2W Rry 1}II 26. I-IS Baselipe Intmchav8e Rempmaumiw 100 Rey IS-18 2c 1-15 Fomhill loterelmge Rewm0unniop 1,90D Rq. 19-20 1D. 1.1511E St. IotmWgc Reronalrvmiop 2f00 ReF 21-21 L. I-]0 Milliken IptercWoBe Reromwmpn 11,6W Rq. 2321 36. I-10 Haseo Interclmoge Rewmtmmpn 6,000 Rey 21-26 k 110 ArNibaW Interelungc Repmttnminp 6,]W Rq. 27-7H 4a. Fagbill Phan 1 Imptov, (Grove to live) 5,9'!1 SutrRey 29 46. FomNe Phan II Imptw. (Htlma to Harev) 5,100 Sub-ReB. 30 4c. FwtEill Phax III Imptw. (lino to Helve) 5,300 Sub-Rq. 31 dd. Famhill Phase IV Imptw. (1-15 to Ent) 1,300 SutrRq. 20 4e. Foothill Impmv. (Rocbetme m I-IS) 2,460 SptrReg. 19 Sa. 19th St. Impmv. (WCL m CamNun) dNl SutrRey 32 Sb. 191h St. Impmv. (Camdian to Ammhyit) 1,010 SutrRq. 33 Sc. 191h S~ Imptw. (ANtibahl to Haven) 514 SptrRey 34 54. 1Rh SL Imptw. (Hawn to HieElaoC) 460 Bub-Rq. 33 6. EliwanEa Witlenin8 (SCL m 1.10) 710 SuRRey 36 table A-1 (mo'~ DESCRIP7lON O g9ba N N 7. Milliken Widening (SC la I-10) 730 Suh-Rq. 29 8. Haven Widening (SCL b 1-IO) ]SO SubRq. 25 9. AaLibakd WWenmg (SCL to 1.10) ]50 Sub-Rq. 2] lo. Vioryud Widenng (SCL m Id0) 750 SuMReg. 37 ter. ctmnooa aigwt utwmmtaw ut. law, w t.tu/ ~~ auo-nag. >o 12 MBiiten Sigel Cendimtim Eia (S(1, l0 1.10) l3 SubRq. 23 13. Haven Sigel Caadieatbe Ert (SCL m 1-IO) ]l SubRq. 25 1/. ArtldbaW Sigel CaoNietbo Etl. (SCL to 1.10) 13 Sub•RCp 27 15. Vinryatd Sigel Gaxdietioo Fat (SCL b Id0) 13 Sub-Rep 77 Ib. Grove Signal Coetdimtbo FiL (gCL b I-]0) II Sub-Rep 3S 1]. Bavline lmpnrv. (Uay Leek Gmnncl b EG.) 1,600 Gry Backbooc IB 18. Chary Imprtw. (1-15 to Wilwe) 1,590 City Backbo0c 39 19e. Church Imptw. (E/O MiiBkrn to Rorhata) 160 City Backbone 40 19b. Church Impmv. (Rahattt to Day Crat) 1,350 City Bukbone 41 19c Church improv. (Day Creek to EtiuaMaj 1}40 Ciry Backbone 42 20. Dry Creek Improv. (ROChattt b SR-30) 11,710 City Backbone 4315 21a. Feral Imptw. (Footh0l to Summit) /90 City Backbrme 11,15 21 b. Fast hOptov. (Summit to WIWn) 960 City Backbone 46 Z:m. Etiaaibe Imptov. (Arrow w FootlWl) 500 City Backbone 17 226. EliwaMa Imptw. (Foothill to Bau0im) 540 Gry Batkbane 45 2i. Mi0er Impiw. (Eliwanda to Eut) 990 Gry Backlooc I9 24a. MBBken lmptw. (6th St. to letsey) 2,090 Gry Barkl+ooe 50 Tale Ad (mph) __ DPSCRIp710N COST (OOM) DFSIONATIDN LINK REFERENCES 246. Miltitm Imptw. (Atmw to Fodh01) 1,630 Gry Brkbc0e 51 24c MiltiYnv ImPtm'~ (SB Item 1N mi. Np Wllaoo w Bapyvo) 1,990 City 8ackbooe 52 25. Rodtata Impmv, (Baseline to Highlaed) 1470 City Baet:bope s3 Z6. Tem Yum Imprw. (Mt. Vicw to ChutrA) ]IO Gry Barl:bmc b a,. v1mON trop wpmv. (Uay Clap to CLUmp) 3,390 Ciry aarpintm 50 78. Waldman Bulwel[ Impmv. (Cheery to Wiboo) 1310 Gry BarYbaoe s3-36 29a. Wihm Impmv. (1/4 mi. fi/O CasMun w AmethyaQ l.bm Ciry Bahbom 37 296. Wi9vao Imptw. (Dar Crtat m Millitrn) 1,210 Ciry Bac9hooe 38 29c Wihm Imptw, (Dry Caalt to ECL) 3310 Gry pv4lvw 39,60 AW, bih SL Impmv. (Rochata to I-15) 120 Gry Radbooe l3 306. 6th St. Imprvv. (1-ls to F~iw+Ma) 430 City 0arkbone ]I SOR~TOTAL COST 1]1.930 ll. Reilmad C vino ou. aT @ SF Rft Xing Impmv. pt tlata) 31 b. AT @ SF RR Xing Impsw. (n Hcllmao) 31 c. AT @ SF RR Xiog Imprw. (at Hetmou) 31d. AT @ SF RR Xing Imptw. (at Cerra) 31<. AT @ SF' RR Xing at Gfad< Impov. (at Haven) 31f. AT @ SF RR Xing Grbc Sepamtior. (at Haven) 31g. AT @ SF RR Xing Grade Separation (at Mi0ikm) 31h. AT @ SF RR Xwg Impsw. (a Rochata) 31i. AT @ SF AR Xing IaFrw. (at Etiweoda) 250 RR Xing 1 350 ftR Xiog 2 100 RR Xing l 350 RR Xing 4 In RR zing s SRIO RR %iog 5 5310 RR Xivg 6 400 RR Xwi 7 290 RR Xiog p Table A3 (m09) _ DESCRIP'DON CO OOOaI DESIGNATION RYIg REFER CES 31j. AT A 5F RR XWg Grade Sepua0oo (at ArtbibaM) 5,810 PR Xioi 9 Tla. SP RR Xieg Imptw. (at Gmte) 290 RR Xwg IO 326. SP RR Xivg Imprw. (xt FaothBl) 4,3W RR Xlog 11 32~ SP RR Xhy Impmv. (at Hellmav) 325 RR Xini 12 am, ar RR AIOg Imprw. (at uur3ive) 130 RR Xioi 13 32c. SP RR Xiry Imptov. (n AmeWyu) 150 RR ]Gvi 11 I21. SP RR XIn6 Imprw. (at Ramona) 200 RR Xwi IS 128. SP RR Xini Impmv. (tl Herman) 350 RR Xiag 13 ]2h. SP RR Xing Imptw. (at Hnm) 265 RR Xwg I6 32i. SP RR Xing ImprOV. (a Dry CSeek) 290 RR Xivg 17 32j. SP RR %ini Impew. (at Etiwavda) 150 RR Xing 18 32L SY RR Xiag Imprw. (at FiY) 290 RR Xicg 19 33. Arraa~ ~ SF Spw (WN MiIO[en) 290 RR Xing 20 >4. <~h SL SF Spur (FJO Santa Attiu) 150 RR Xivg 21 35. 61h SL SF Spw (WXI Hennm) 290 RR Xing 22 36. 8th gt.. 2 SF Spun (Fjp ArcLIWH) i]3 RR Xing 2) 3]. 8th SL SF Spun !WX) Haven) 1,50 RR Xivg 21 38. 8th St. SF Spun (WX) Rvchvur) 150 RR Xivg 25 ]9. 91h SL SF Spur (E/O Gmve) 150 RR Xivg 26 70. Jersey SF Spur (Wp Millitev) 290 RR Xing 25 5(JB-TOTAL COST' Ig,3]0 GRAND TOTAL COST 203.500 N 19 I I i -_ ~ _ ~ S] 58 59 60 r 32 J6 55 36 C ] 3 9 J3 J 5 11 39 g I 2 O !- h.-1 ~ 11 T U 32 33 ~ 3J 35 53 t JJ 0 IS 5 le Is J6 ~ JI Js R J9 I> JS 3 3J 30 ~ 29 31 5~ 19 20 J] • 5D IJ m t3~ 3B 21 22 3] rr "' °'m 2] 25 36 y za zs u Figure A-1 LINK IMPROVEMENTS SUB-REGIONAL, AND FOR REGIONAL, CITY BACKBONE Aw77Niow7 M~oeuru, INa IMPROVEMENTS N I~ ~ t~ d ao t ~ ~ ° ~ u to ie iv n ~< 5 y 3 i} ~z ~ $ ~ „<,~ 3 n io I 26 25 m~ 2 9 3 ~ 5 B ' 2} 2A 6 R E2 ' ~ € ~ 2. 6 W~ 9 ~ ~ 9 Figure A-2 LINK IMPROVEMENTS FOR ~~AWTIMOWT McOCtl1Tl~, INC, RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS 71b1e A-2- SUMMARY OF 4NK COST A1IACATIONS LINK Y fAGT7ON COST (OOOa) DESIGNATION RP.FERENCE I. Rttional, Suh-Rnbnal snd qrv R atltbo0c 1 SR-3o PA CatneBa0 8,336 Rey la A 10 m4 dIVWW by 6 3 SR-30 FiC3 ArtbibaW 8,336 Rq. la R tb cal dIVMW by 6 3 SR-30 PfD Haven 8,336 Rq, la ~ Ib mu dWWed by 6 / SR-b PJO MdILLm 8,336 Rey la ! lb eoY divided by 6 S SR-m &O Day Cray 8,336 Rey la B lb met dhidW by 6 6 SR-30 Fi0 Eavt 8,336 Rty la dt lb cal tlictdetl q' 6 ] Mhilvltl N40 SR-30 930 Rey Ic ma divided by 6 e NrhiWN SN SR-m 970 Rq. I<rat dividrd bl6 9 MOliten NA SR-30 930 Rq. Ic ml divided by 6 10 Milliken S/O 5R-70 930 ReS, lc cal dividd by 6 l1 Fml N/O SR-30 1.163 Rq. ~ lc mu dividrd Iry 6 (S9i0) City Badbae + 21a roll divided by 2(5233) 12 Favt Sb SR-30 930 Rey Ic mu dividM by 6 17 blh Sl. WN 1-15 6,2m Rq. & 'a mrt divitlW q 2 (56.1Q7) cry Backbone + 30a ml (itm) Id 61h Sl. FJO 1-IS 630 Rey A 7a ,W dividN by 2 (56,100) cry Backbone + Sob ml (5430) 15 Eul NIO 1-15 683 Rq. & 2b mu dividN by 1(515 0) City Badbone ~ ` + 21a ml divided W 2 `-N) 16 Ba+eli0e EJO Ida 450 Rq. 76 mt dividd by 1 I] Fi~l 6/O 1-IS 150 Rq, m mal divided by 1 IB [iattlix WK) I-15 ;050 Ret. i 2b mp divided by 1 (5150) dry Bactb9ne + i] m1t (f 1,600) 19 Fo9lbi0 W/O LIS 4,110 Rq. at 7< mat dividrd by 2(51,930) SubRq. + k mat (57,160) LINK_1 LOGTION COST lOOOcI D:SIGNATION RA+~RENCE 20 Fodh01 Ep 1-IS 6,250 Rq. @ 2c a.t dicitad by 2 (51,950) 21 nth St. wro 1.13 1,250 Rq. Td mn dividd q' a u am st. Ero I~IS I,uo Rey 2e ant ei.iaee by 2 23 MIWkm Np 1-10 bybi Rey @ 7a tap eivldcd by 2 (fS,bW) + 12 ml (513) 24 MIIIiSta Sp 1-10 Sp00 Rq, y anY divided by 2 'J 1{~ Np 1-10 3,]Ql Rq. @ 3h eau divides by 2 (53,000) SubRq. + e acct (5750) + 13 mN (f13j x6 Haven S'D 1.10 3,000 Rey 3h ta1 dnded b7 2 2] ArtMWb Np I-10 3,913 Rq. @ 3c aW eNidrd bf 2(1.7.150) Sub-Rq. + 9 mt (5]50) + l1 mct (513) 28 ArcbiWW Sp 1.10 1,150 Rq. 3c oat dividrd by 2 29 Faabill FIO Vim~aN 5,9'!5 SubRq. N wct 3o F(.vhill Wtn Hsw•^_ 3,190 SuS~Rq. 4h:nt 31 Faah01 Fi0 HeJlmaa 5,100 SubRey k avl 32 19b SI. Wp Gn¢lun 420 SubRR. Se act 33 191h St. Wp Hcllmav 1,010 Sun-Rey Sh eat 3a 1Ab St. F/O AerbibaM 514 Sub-Rey Sc aoa JS 19th St. Fib Havrn 460 Sun-RR. 5d ap 36 Etiwcodc Np 1.10 ]63 SubRey 6 ant (5750) + I1 au (S13) 37 Viayud Np 1-10 763 Sub-Rq. 10 ml (f DSO) + IS act (513) 38 Gtwc Np L10 13 SubRq. 16 rust 39 Cbnry Np 1-IS 1,370 Ciry Btribae 18 art cable wa (covq LINK/ IACATION ec /WOaI DPSIGNA7lpN R FERENCG 40 CLUtW Wq Rovbeter 2,3W t}ty Batlcbove 19a art (51,560) + 26 mt (5740) 41 CLUtcL E/O Rachmler 1,780 Gry eackbove 196 oat 42 Churn Wp Etiwavda 1340 City Backbove t9c mat 13 Dry C1eek N/O SR-30 3,903 Gry Bvkbove 20 01 divided by 3 .. ~_r ~,.. ..... :.......~. ,,..,., c.tr rniamate w ra.a enaret ey ., 43 Day Leek S,p (]1ur41 7,903 Ciry Badbove ID mM divWN by 3 46 Flat N/p Summit 760 City Backbove 216 mtt 47 Etinada NN Artw 300 Ciry eackbvve 2?a cw 48 Elivavda SN Eaaelioe 540 Ciry Barkkate 226 Dort 49 Mille Wrp Fiat 990 Ciry Badbove 27 mu 50 MBlikev SrV ]nary 7,090 Ciry Backbovc ida wn 31 Millikev N/O Attox 1,630 City Baekbac TA6 cou 32 Miliitrn 5/O Wilwo 1,990 Ciry Bukbone 24c mat 33 RoMeuer N,p Bavdirre 2,870 Ciry Baekbove 23 cW 54 V~cteria Loop W/O Dry Creek 3,590 Ciry Baetbove 27 mat 33 Watdouv Bullock StO Wilwv 1,103 City Baekbooe 78 mst dindod by 2 56 WaAmav BuBak W/O C6eny 1,303 City Backbove 78 mst divided by 2 37 Wihov W/O Hellmav 1,640 City Baekbovc 29a you 38 WOwv W/O Mil0km 1,210 Ciry Barkbooe 296 Doer 39 Wilwn FJO Etiwavda 1,770 City Backbvve 29c cat dirided q' 2 60 Wibov E/O Wardvuv BuWrk t,T70 City Backbvve 29c Gott divided by a SUBTOTAL COST 171,930 .+wc n~2 Linnt) LINK Y LAGTTON W51'lOOOaS DESIGNASTON REFERENCE II. Rcilratl GmginP t BaW NpD &n 31. 250 RR Xing 31a mn 2 H41map N/O [th St. 350 RR JGng 316 mst 3 Hetmaa N,O [th St. 000 RR Xing 31c mst d Cenic NN &b St. -- v.:~iug Jltl mn 5 Haven Nb Btb St. 4745 RR Xing 31e mtl (5023) + 3:f mat (S5,[W) 6 Milliken &O Jcney 5,840 RR Xin[ ll[ mtt '1 Rorbaler Sb ]m y 400 RR JLing 3I6 aal B EliwaMC 5/O Armv 290 RR Xing 31i mtl 9 AtrJUlub NA etb 31. S,&0 RR Xing 31j mct 10 Grove NN Ampw 290 RR Xipg 3L mat I1 Fmtntll W/O Deker 4,300 RR Xing 336 ~t I: I lellman S/O Budinc 525 RR Xing 3k ml 13 Oaselia FIp Hcllpun i>n i.R Juug 374 tact l4 Amcth]sl N/O Baulipc 150 RR XipB 32e met 15 Henmu WO Beteline 550 RR Xipg 37f wt (5200) + 3k mn (s3m) 16 Haven N/O 0u4m< 265 RR Xing 32h tat 17 Day Crcck N/O Baselipe 290 RR Xing 121 eat IS Eliwantla N/O Bau~ine I50 RR Xing 325 au 19 Fml N/O 1-IS 290 !tR 7Rpg 328 met 20 Armw WX) MEtikm 290 RR Xing 33 cat 21 4lh St. Flo Sanla Apib 150 RR J(ing 34 Dort 22 6th SC Wp Hennas 290 RR Xing 15 coat Sld! AK (me'Q LINK • ~ 770N CO41' (OOhI DESIONA710N REFERENCE n wh sl. E,n Arcme.W ns RR wog a6 ml ]A 8th SI. Wp Fhnn 150 RR Xing 3] rm 25 ]eery Wp NtiWYm 4i0 RR Xing 36 mu (SISh) + b oou (#90) 26 mn SI. E/O G~ae 1S0 RR wog 39 ooel SDR-TOTAL COST 25,5]0 GRAND TOTAL COST 20I~00 APPIIVDDY B TRATrFIC SHA1iE DERIVATION PROI:EDURE 'ilia appeado< describes the traffic share derivation component of the nexus procedure, METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW Traffic on any given link of the circulation system is made up of many individual Mps each having their own specific origin and destination The nexus procedure ideutifies these origins and as _-.---..~ °' ~^' •~~• "~c awW aP" i~ wwpuvenu or me frame on any given link can be summari~ra To derive the traffic shazes, me is made of the buddout (Post-2010) ve[aion of the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model (RCCM). This is a special tmD'ic forecasting procedure developed for the city which forecasts peak how and ADT traffic on the city's cuculatioa system. The traffic share data is accumulated during the traffic assignment process. The assignment process is one wmponevt of the RCl'M whereby zone-to-zone trips are assigned m a traffic network During this auignmeat process, the trips on each designated network hnk are accumulated according to their zonal origins and destinations. In summarizing the share data, certain procedures aze followed to ensure logical and consistent information that cae be used in establishing funding shams. Such pna:erlures are iargeiy related to differentiating between "trips" (the traffic volume on a link) and "tripends" (the trat5c generated by an area), Every trip bas two Wpenda (the origin avd the destination of the trip) avd the procedure reconciles the two ends of [he trip, so that doublecounting is avoided Traffic shares are based on trips, so that a share represents the proportion of trips on a link that are related to a given area. The traffic share procedure sepazates trips into those related [o existing development versus those related to future development (termed "participating" development throughout this report). Hence, traffic shares are allocated ody to participating development The resulting tratlic share data base summarizes the traffic on each sekxted link according to its geographic components and its development components (participating and non-participating). As noted above, ooe of the fundemontal assumptiorm in the nexus proceduro is that traffic shares on the designated circulation Bala will be assigned to participating development only. Other assumptions allect the manner in which internal versus external trips are agacated m each area, and are discussed below. Traffic sham are expressed is terms of trips (as distinct from "tripends' used in trip generation). While every trip has two tripends (one at each end of the trip), the allocation procedure u such that [he sum of the ahafess sans m roc w[ai uawu vuiuwc ni iuc gb,"u i.,..ai:o,.. The traffic share analysis examines [he geographic characteristics of the Mps ai selected locations on the circulation system. Depending on the trip origin and destination, then a basic separation into three trip types is first made as fogrnvs: 1. Between internal zones 2. Between internal and external nines 3. Between external zones (thru trips) These basic trip types are then separated according to whether the trips are related to participating or non-participating development Hence, the geographic locations of the trip origin and desrination, and the relaiiunsiup W future dzveloixncnt arc taih considered ir. the shsre allocation process. To explain the basic allocation principles and assumptions, Figure B-1 illustrates the different types of trips that will use any given network link The trip types are labeled a-a, b-b, e[c., and represent trips from one zone to another which pass through a designated traRe share link The share allocation for each of these trip types can be summarized as follows: :~ W a F c °, ~ U W J a ` ~ a m c H '~ a N N W y m~ ti [ w ma uv u~v.. my ~ = T x ~I I ~ 'I I ~ Z m1a vi'm o±vl..j m v \ \\\ \ v v c c N N m m ~ ~ a-a Betwxn the pariicipadng portion ofan internal mne and an external area - one trip allocated to the participating development in the internal mne. b-b Between the participating portions of internal cones -one-half trip allocated to the participating development in each max cc Betwrxn the participating portion of an internal mne and the non- participating portion of en internal mne - one trip allocated to the participating development in the aforementioned mne. d-d,ec Trips related mlety to non-participating development -not allocated f-f Thru trips - not allocated. One of the key principles in the allocation precrss imroWes trip type b-b. These are trips nn the given link From a participating portion of the analysis area to another participating portion of the analysis area and have one-half of the trip assigned to each end The reason for the fialf trip allocation is to avoid double counting of such trips, and maintain the trip rather than tripend basis for the share data. For those trips starting or ending in a participating portion of the analysis area but with the other end either in a non-participa[ing portion of the analysis area or outside the analysis area, the whole trip is allocated to the pariicipatng development This recognizes that the other end of the trip involves anon-participating entity (i.e., non-participating development or outside the analysis area), and is consistent with the assumption noted above whereby non-participating areas are not oars of the share allocation, and trips zre allocated only to participating dcvclopment; in the analysis area. The various components of the share data are extracted on a tratEc mne basis. These are then combined with the appropriate cost data, end fivalty grouped into larger sub-areas. COST ALLOCATION The cost allocation follows directly from the moat share data. The costs for oath link are dtstdbuted among the analysis area zones according_to the traffic share !or each zone. The following relationships are used to calculate the cost allocations: IE G =cost for Gnk k and: Sa =share of link k traffic attributable to zone i then: allocated coat for zone i for link k is AC, = q . S,; This simple pro-rata formula allocates costs between the zones, but does not fully distdbute the total cost of the link (G). The reason is that part of the tratfic is thru trips end trips related to non-participating development (the "noo•agocared" trips noted previouxly). This non-allocated share of the cost u apportioned to the other user of the link. To derive a total zonal cost for the traffic shares from a given zone, the zonal link costs for that zone are summed over every link as [ogows: Total cost for zone i TG = x rACa Where: AG, is the allocated cost for zone i From link k noted shove. Hence the total cost allocation For zone i is the sum of casts allocated to this zone for every link being considered. For use in the financing program, cost shares by zone are accumulated into larger sub-areas. COST SHARE RATES The cost shares for each sub-area are summarized in the form of dollars per trip generated For example, if the cast allocation for a given sub-area h S1W,000 and that area generates 1,000 participating Mpends by Post-2010, then the share is 100 dollars per tripend The aut share per tripend h a corrvenient measure which relates directly to the basis on which the share data is extracted. For use in the nexus program, the costs per trip end are wnverted to costs per'$quivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU)". In making this conversion, EDU's are calculated from the various land uses according to the factors designated for each land use. The EDUs are then reduced by 15 percent to account for development that is in the traffic model dam, but which is either already in place or is uohYcty to occur wiWin a reasonable t!!ne Lama In conjunction with the "excmpP land uses, this reaulta in an adjustment of close to 20 percent in translating from an ADT to an EAU bazia. s DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT • City of Rancho Cucamonga February 1991 • TABLE GF CpI1T>fTS CHAP719! ONE: Page No. I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 Purpose and Intent ............ .. ...................... 1 Legislative Authority .... ............................. 1 Organization .......................................... 3 Public Pa rtlciPation .................................. 3 General Plan Consistency ..... ......................... 4 II. POPULATIdI CHARACTERISTICS ................................ 5 III. HOUSING CHAAACTERISTICS ................................... 7 IY. HOUSING DEIINID ............................................ 9 Y. VACANT LAND INYENTDRY .....................................11 YI. HWSIN6 AVAILABILITY ......................................14 VII. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS ..................... .............15 • VIII. ENERGY CONSERYATIOI ~POR711NITIES .........................16 IX. EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIOIIS ...............................16 X. CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEYELOPNEIIT OF Ng15ING .................17 XI. EYALUATIgI OF PREVIOUS OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AMD PROGRAM aRON 1984 HOUSING ELETEIIT UPDATE ... ...........18 CHAPTER iYO: I. GOAL, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AID PROGRAMS ..................19 DRAFT EOR' DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ~~ • HpISING ELEMENTI - CHAPTER piE DRAFT I. IMTRGDIICTICN FOFt DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Puroose and Intent The Housing Element Ts intended to provide rest dents of the community and local government officials with a greater understandfng of the housing needs in Rancho Cucamonga and to provide guidance to the decision-making process in all matters relating to housing. The document analyzes existing and future hM~c {1111 naoAc An Vninnc a nhl ar_enl Vfnn ofrafn_nu nA •.t M._ _ _ _ .s action toward achieving the stated housing goals and objectives. _ This document Ts required by State Law to update the Housing Element originally approved with the General Plan in 1981 and amended in 1984. This update incorporates the most recent demographic information and housing trends available to accurately assess the state of housing in Rancho Cucamonga. • Legislative Authority The Legislature of the State of California has identified the attainment of a decent home and a satisfying environment for every resident of the State of California as a goal of highest priority. Recognizing that local planning programs play a significant rote Tn the Dursuit of this goal, and to assure that local planning effectively implements Statewide housing policy, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties include a Housing Element as part of their adopted local General Plan. Section 65583 of the California Government Code requires the preparation of a Housing Element to "consist of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goats, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled programs for the preservation, tmprovement, and development of housing." The Housing Element must also identify and make "adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community." lAll support data and sources are cited Tn Chapter 3, Technical Appendix. 1 .he State Hwsiny Element guidelines rc^q,;ire threw basic compone;is to be included as follows: • I. An assessment of local housing needs and an inventory of local resources and constraints relevant to meeting these local needs. Ii. A statement(s) of the caamunity'S goals, quantified ob,lectfves, and policies relative to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. ut. a program wmen secs force a five-year sciirtiuie of a~i.iun, Gm 7w.a7 government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goats and obSecN ves of the Housing Element. In addition Lo the required contents of the Element listed above the Legislature sets specific guidelines for the periodic review and evaluation of the Element which should include the following: 1. A review of the actual results of the previous element's goats, • obSectives, policies, and programs. 2. An analysis of the significant differences between what was protected or planned and what was achieved. 3. Based on the above, a description of how the goals, obSectives, policies and programs of the revised Element incorporate what has been learned from the results of analysis of the previous Elmment. DRAFT FOFI DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 2 • DRAFT • Organization 1='OR ~ISCUSSICiN PiJRFt7SES OWLY The Housing Element consists of three chapters. While the first two chapters are contained therein, Chapter 3 is part of the General Plan Technical Appendix. This format has been chosen so that the importance of the City's programs is not lost or diluted with the calculations, graphs, or other technical information. Chapter One contains a brief synopsis of the technical data collected. Chapter Two identifies the City's housing goal and defines the five year action program with quantified objectives and policies. The third chapter contains in detail the technical data and calculations as well as the analysis of the previous element's goals, objectives, policies, and programs, The information provided in the combined document is based on the best available background data and acts as a framework for the City's identified housing needs and subsequent policies and programs. It is the City's Intent to continually monitor and expand an the established housing programs and to prepare a canplete update again in 1994. The goal, objectives, policies and programs of the Housing Element have been prepared so as to 6e consistent with the other elements of the General Plan. Public Participatim Section 65583(c) of the California Government Code states that local jurisdictions must make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the comminity in the development of the housing Element. To achieve this end, notices of public aaeetings were advertised in a local paper of general cirwlatian, the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, utilizing threetolu~ ads which are larger than the mintau 1/B page ad required by Section 65091(a)(3) of the California 6overn•ent Code. to addition, notices rere posted in the City's coaaynity and neighborhood center as well as at City Hall. Meettig notices were sent to the local chapter of the Building Industry Associatim amd to ne~bers of the Citizens Advisory Task 3 DRAFT FOR QiSCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Force whteh had originally been fona[d to advise the City Redevelopwmt staff • and the Housing Subcor•ittte awslbers of the Cityy Council regsrding the developwent of fhe Affordable Housing Strategy for use of the Redevelopawnt 20 percent set aside funds. Task force aasnbers included representatives fro. the Raneho Cucawonga Chanter of Caanerce, wa,1or lenders, for profit developers, neighborhood leaders, smtor citizens, and wobile hoe park residents. As part of the disasslon, the task force aa~ber5 were appraised of the upcewing horsing flenent revision, City needs assessaxa~t and possible prograws to meet identified needs. A 45-dgy reriew period by the State Housing and C~ni;y Development Departwent followed cagletion of the revised Housing flement draft. ~ canslderatian of HCD's written casents, the draft was revised in substantial cupliance with those cements. A copy of the f1na1 adopted draft fl sent was sent to HCD for their review. 3e aehieve this gear Aur#n9 the preparat#en e# this Aeswaentr beih the Teehn#aa} A-pend#ar anA Bb,#eetive anA Pre9rawts seat#ens were reviewed by the P}annin~ Geawissien ai re~w#ar#y sehedw}eA pub}is •eet#ngs. A 99-day rev#ew period by the State Meus#n9 and 6ewaunity • Beve}epnrent Bepartnrent FN69} #e#}awed asap#et#en a# the Bra#t Neusin9 6}ewentt with a 46-day review #e}#ewin9 eaapleiien e# anenduenis therea€ter. 6eawents r~seived €rea N6B were eensidereA prier to adepE#en, 3n aAA#tienr review e€ the Aesament was advert#sed #n She 9a#ly Report newspaper anA pwblis Haar#ngs were he}0 by the Planning hewnissien and 6ity 6ewnsi# to r~seive pvb}ie Eestineny prier Ee adoption. General Plan Consistency The City's General Plan is congosed of the seven State mandated eieawrts as well as four optional tleawmts wAich hsve been caabined together to fors three super elements. These three super elements are Lard Use and Develapawrot (Land Use, Cirwlatton, Noosing, Public FaNlitles, and Caraunity Design), Environarental Resources (Canservatian, (ben Space, and Fnergy~Conservation), and Pub11c Health and Safety (Pub11c Safety and Noise). 4 • bRAFT ~'OR DiSCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • The organizatlm and canstructlm of She General Plan into these weer elements helps to ensure crosistency aawng the goals, objectives, and policies curtained in the different elements. Far exaagle, the Land Use flsent sets forth the mount and type of residential development permitted, thereby affecting housing apportmlty 1n Rancho Cutamurga chile the Clrculatlm El sent curtains policies to minimize roadway traffic Tn residential neighborhoods. The Comaunity Design flsent curtains policies directed at maintaining the existing housing stock and enwring the quality of ner residential development. The Envirosmtal Resources El sent establishes policies to minimize the fapact of residential development ur sensitive resources, such as hillside areas, ecological habitat, and scenic viersheds. Yhile, the Public Safety flsent sets forth policies to enwre the safety of the City's housing stock through mitigatim of natural aM manmade hazards. In additiur to the organtzatlur of the dacsent, the City provides periodic updates of the General Plan Mich also helps to enwrc cursistency. fie mast recently cogleted technical update t0 the General Plan ws adapted Jamury 4, 1990. Periodic updates of the General Plan and Housing El sent also help to • ensure cursistency rith other lmg range plans including the Redevelopment Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and the sour to be Camlestim Nanageoent Plan. II. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Rancho Cucamonga Ts located in the San Bernardino-Ontario Regional kousing Market area. This market area Ts in one of Lhe fastest growing regions in Southern California. Between 1970 and 1980, the population of this market area grew by 25 percent marking it as one of the fastest growing areas in Southern California. Estimates by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the State Employment Development Department reveal that the west end of San Bernardino County has captured much of the market area's growth in both populatim and ,lobs and that this trend is likely to continue. 5 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Rancho Cucamonga's role is shifting from that of a "bedroom suburb" for the broader region to a more economically integrated city with a mixture of • residential, camaerciaT, and industrial development. Between 1970 and 1980 the population grew from 16,043 to 55,250, an increase of approximately 244 percent. The population as of January, 1989, was estimated to be 105,292 according to the State Department of Finance. Since incorporation, in November of 1977, the City's population has increased 136 percent, with growth occurring at an annual average rate of 8.2 percent. The greatest population increase occurred from 1975 to 1980 when the Ctty grew oy J9,YU/ persons at a rate of 22 percent per year. A second peak occurred from 1986 through 1989 during which time the population Tncreased by 31,512 persons at an average annual rate of 12.5 percent. The Southern California Association of Governments provides individual communities with population projections. SCAG's last adopted population projection for the City provided in the 1982 Modified Growth Projection, predicted that the City's population would be 84,000 by 1988 and 127,500 by the year 2000. However, as of January 1, 1988, the City's population of • 94,614, was estimated to be 12.6 percent above the SCAG 1982 protection. Based upon a vacant land survey conducted in December of 1989, the projected build-out population for Rancho Cucamonga is estimmted to be between 157,079 and 163,228 persons. These estimates indicate that build-out is not expected to occur until sometime after 2010, probably closer to 2015 or 2020. It is reasonable to assume that the City's growth rate may eventually moderate dowmvard due to the Inevitable slowing of development that will occur as more easily developed land is built-out. Of course, the housing market, interest rates, and general availability of money will also have a significant impact in detereining build-out and when it will occur. 6 • 'DRAFT F'OT! DISCUSSION PURPO5E8 C)NLY fhe demographic prvfiie of Rancho Cucamonga residents differed little from • that of the County in 1980. The median ago of the community was 26.6 years. The City had a slightly higher percentage of younger people, Nhltes and Spanish sur-named than the County. About 39 percent of the residents were under'~the age of 19, and about 57 percent were between the ages of 20 to 64 years. A breakdown of the City's population by race indicated that 87 percent of the populatiai in 1980 was Caucasian. However, in terms of ancestry as opposed to race, 16.3 percent of the total population wds of Spanish origin. Of the total population in 1980, 55,250 people, approximately 45.1 percent or 2;,~;v, were employed in the labor force. The two meior types of industrial employment sources in Rancho Cucamonga are durable manufacturing and retail trade. Of the occupational employment sources oast of the labor force was 1n clerical positions followed close by with craft/repair positions. Of the working labor force living in Rancho Cucamonga in 1980, approximately 10 percent working 1n the City, based on commuter patterns. The ma,{ority of workers commuted to Los Angeles County. • A recent survey of focal employers, conducted in January of 1990, found that 11.7 percent of the employees surveyed lived and worked in the City. Mhile it does not appear that commuter patterns have changed significantly since 1980, it is important to note that commercial and industrial development has not kept pace with residential growth as over half of the available commercial and industrial land is vacant. Therefore, 1t is anticipated that in the taming years the amount of employment in the City will increase, and therefore the number of persons who both live and work Tn the City should increase. III. HOUSING CIIAIfACTERISTICS The 1980 Federal Census established the total nu~er of dwelling units in Rancho Cucamonga to be 17,839. The Department of Finance estimates for January 1, 1989, Indicated a dwelling unit count of 34,449. Based upon SCA.G's 7 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ®NLY Regional Nousi.^.q kaeds Assessment (Rp.#A; projections and City estimates, the . expected unit count for the year 2000 is 49,752 with the build-out unit count estimated to be between 57,016 and 59,248. Of the existing units, the majority are of single-family nature and are owner occupied, As of January 1980, 85 percent of the housing units were owner occupied and 15 percent renter occupied. Single-family units accounted for 84 percent oP the City's housing stack; duplexes, triplexes, and fourpiexes accounted for 28 percent; multi-family units with more than 5 units equaled 5.7 percent and mobile hones constituted 7.6 percent of the total stock count of 17,839. As fast as construction has occurred, the overall vacancy rate for the City's housing stock, as shown by the 1980 census, was 4.8 percent. The vacancy rate for single family type units averaged 5.1 while awl 4iple family units averaged 4.5 percent. Mobile home unit types experienced the lowest vacancy rate of 1S in 1980. The City's overall vacancy rate in the years from 1981 to 1989 has varied from • a low of 3.21 percent in 1983 to a high of 12.71 in 1987, with an average rate of 6.27 for the entire period. Yacancy rates tend to be reflective of new construction activity, with rates tending to decrease during periods of low growth, as in the years 1982 through 1984, and to increase during periods of rapid growth, a5 in the years 1985 through 1987, when the average yearly increase of new dwelling units averaged 14.6 percent. In 1990, residents in Rancho Cucamonga had the hfghest median household income of (24,868, as compared to ail 37 communities and the unincorporated areas of the County. Recent estimates provided by Hilliams Kuebelbeck and Associates indicate that the City's median income for 3989 of 544,546, has continued to be significantly higher than that of San Bernardino Canty, S29,546. The most prominent source of intone 1n 1980 was the standard wage or salary with just over 50 percent of all residents receiving this type of income. 8 • the Percent op a significant household's ineome- Deveto social indicator, the Feders~nt on housing torts can Pment has Prov idonthly gross to ncomeedsho a 9uidel ins thata no tent of Housing and Urban Dece ed by 5L',Qg to the uld go for flaying ho more than 3D percent of RnechoeCucamo8ga ~of'whlch that vther~ kareo 5 979 laws si~eds sASSessment"mtof ome for she}ter, 3`069 are r income hour IY. HDDSI116 DE paying more than 30 percent@Uf{thei'r xun The md,j6r fd expected a ctor that w{il affect the ^~1°Yment growth demo rtd for homer to ~ ema ndD forarPAroe'industroammea ndacommer'ndusir~alnSector~ ty Durine in Table III-q, a Xima toty 50,378 ne ausin} areas in the City wi77 w h 9 unfts in the re tt is the Cfty's desire g1D" as ~ tY, whichl l{s ots many to aiPly vemPloYed ab'e anA affo rdab)y pricetl housi (the Ciat wi11 range fromrlt 7red to as thercapture Passib}e to reside ingthe n0 9 coif 9na)lCa[ o locally genera ted cemrlo lY ex{st~rtg)~P tog a Capture usin alto respective i.y, n at build-out for beiween~5t884 ands I5elugt Units DF2AFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 9 Di7AFT FOR C/ISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TABLE B • 4 • PnaecTm cawenaA~ wrrn wousraiu Housexoi.n OENEMTION wt BuiLDOUT r,aa.o-m U~Mw~kgdACrNp~' 1,218 1,058 1,058 onb. 211 Pbp Arw RWo a.1o oAO o.10 ozs Bullarp Squw FM" 21,240 18,400 18,100 2,288 Sq. R Pr EmpbyM 700 1,000 2,700 350 Empoymrn®BWNart 90,710 16,100 8,610 8,570 PmJw.iW En9bY~t PK Ha~wdi0ld Pmj.ad Addmand FlouuFi01M RM~WOwnnMeYl ToW 571 1119 o.2s 8,218 56,555 500 12,110 74,560 1.Ia 50,878 - • BwOmv~owi o,pmdAUpr,1M7 Yan Td~4 MadYrC11M1WwEmMrWAwwwY. Or,rd PYn Lrd UrmipuW nArrd m6bs yard, m,wnuir, nddbofnod ~dnpbW mm,rdYraY mrwYk YJ~YW PM. R• D; prrdrtlirrr YNrYfll.nrM~tl,Yp rd rrMnrw .. 1.OOaq.h • acua.: rmn TdiM NL/ rd TdY, iue a b OrAAyadt4 NawYV ead.yip.P..e arwBm.wwe.e.d, a Awriw It is the City's goal to increase the capture rate to the extent possible in order to affect an improved jobs/housing batante fn the City as well as in the region as a whole. An improved jobs/housing balance (a shift of new jobs to housing rich areas and Of new housing to job-rich areas) wfll help reduce further congestion and help improve air puality in the region. Based upon SCAG's recent Draft City Projections of March, 1990, and City estimates, Rancho Cucamonga will eventually be job rTth as the existing jobs/housing balance of 1.00 is Drojected to increase to approximately 1.80 at build-out. It is clear then, that the subregional jobs/housing ratTO wTii be improved by way of increased employment growth in Rancho Cucamonga. 10 DRAFT • Y. VACANT LAND INVENTORY FaFi`DISCUSSION PURPOSEg ON(_Y, As described previously, the West End of San Bernardino County and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is expected to continue to be a highly destra6le area for residential, commercial, and industrial growth. The commercial and industrial employment forecasts described 1n Table III-4 indicates a good demand for housing especially when Lhe City desires to have as many employees as possible to work and live locally. The most prmminent resource needed by a commmity in order to meet the demand for hosing is vacant residential lands. As shown in Map A-4 of Chapter 3, the City contains approximately 2,533.74 acres of vacant, uncommitted residential land suitable for development within the City. This vacant acreage atlas density ranges of between Less than two Melling units per acre and going up to 30 dwelling units per acre. As can be seen with the present vacant acreage to the density ranges penaitted, there is an adequate diversity of lands for the development of all types of housing. The vacant land, if developed at 50 percent and 75 percent of the density • range of each residential district, could yield beMeen 13,261 and 15,493 new units respectively. As sham in Table III-5, this would result in between 57,016 and 59,248 total housing units at build-out, which is expected Lo occur between the years of 2015 and 2020. 11 DRAFT FCR QISCUSSION PURPOSes ne~X„ TABLE HI - 5 PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA GENERAL CITY Vacant 1.9GStll9fl Unaommltted > Units et 50% Units M 75% plB6WC.99ns8 HR (.1-2dWac) 118.91 118 iT! VI I 1-'~r4_ w) ,iri. i o 332 489 L (2-4cWac) 59.06 177 207 LM (4-BdWac) 10.45 63 73 M (8-14dWac) 94.24 1037 1178 MH(14.24dWac) 13.98 266 301 H (24.30cu/ac) Totals 630.82 1993 2435 ETIWANDA ER (.1-idWac) 120.36 60 90 VL (.1-2dWac) 562.73 560 840 L (2-4cu/ac) 87.79 263 307 LM (4.8dWaC) 264.82 1589 1854 M (8-14culac) 241.37 ~ 3017 Totals 1277.07 5127 8108 TERRA VISTA LM (4-BdWac) 26.23 157 184 M (8-14du/ac) 61.98 682 775 MH(14-24cu/ac) 54.36 1033 1169 H (24.30dWac) 29.74 ~,~ ~4Z Totals 172.31 2675 2975 Continued • • 12 • • TA81.E NI - 5 CONTINUED PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA VICTORIA VagM 1ffiI~. Uncommittetl AG[4NpS Units at 50% ~algl Ranae Units at 75% IIgpN((~gNpyg LM (4-BdWac) 59.00 354 413 M (8-14dWaC) 169.98 2090 2375 MHf14-24dWac} 24.95 474 536 H (24-31)dWac) 14.21 384 40 Totals 288.14 3302 3729 ANNEXED LAND HR (.1-2dWac) 0 0 0 • VL (.1-2dWac) 165.40 164 246 L (2-4dWac) 0 0 0 LM (a-6dWac) 4 ~ ~ Totals 165.40 164 246 TOTALS 2,533.74 13,261 15,493 ~~~ ONLY FOR pISCUSSION PURPOSES 13 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Lands suitable for affordable housing have also been identified 6y the City and are further discussed in the Technical Appendix. NT thin the two planned . communities of Terra Vista and Victoria, a commitment bas bees was made, as a result of ortginal cmditians of approval and Development Agreearnt, whereby up to 15 percent of the total number of units will be made economically available to families of low and moderate incomes. The total number of affordable rental or ownership dwelling units that can be provided by these two projects is 2,141 units. YI. NOUSIN6 AVAILABILITY The most prominent type of residential construction in the City for the last eleven years has been single family, both detached and attached. Approximately 71 percent of alt units constructed were of this type with abort 29 percent being multiple family unit types. Based upon the existing vacant residential land in the City, in the coming years a majority, or 69 percent of the new housing stock wilt be of a multi-family nature, which is defined as densities of 8 dwelling units per acre or greater, including condominiums, townhames, and apartments. These figures indicate that the City's growth is • follmwing a standard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance of single family development occurs early in a community's development to be followed by multi-family type infill. The two pianned communities of Terra Vista and Victoria will play a significant role in the future housing availability fn the City. As of December 1989, both planned communities had a total of 460 acres of vacant uncommitted residential property. Of that total acreage, 73 percent (337 acres) permits a density range of 4-14 dwelling units per acre wh11e the remaining 26 percent (123 acres) will allow between 14 to 30 dwelling units per acre. As of Oetember 1989, project applications far 332 units in the 4-14 range and 1,439 units in the 14 to 30 density range had been submitted for review within the two planned communities. 14 . • A.ddi ii onaily, varf ous programs availab}e to allow the provision of affordable housing, Tncluding a Condominium Conversion Ordinance, Density Bonus Provisions, Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs, and Redeveiopme nt Agency incentives are discussed 'in detail in Chapter 3. YII. NOBSI N6 ASSISTANCE NEEOS According to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 1966 Regional Fbusing Needs Assessment (RNNA), Rancho Cucamonga was estimated to have 3,069 lower income households who were oavina morn th.., nn ,. ,.,,_. their income on housing, The RNNA also provides projections for the'City as to the number of units that will be needed by 1994 in order to avoid a housing impaction. According to SCAG, approximately 9,568 additional housing units will be needed by 1994 in order to minimize any housing constraints and provide adequate housing to persons wishing to locate in the Rancho Cucamonga area, Of this total number of households, 21246 2,375 are estimated to be very low and low income and ~~ig7 1,729 are estimated to be moderate income. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared, as part of its Community Development Blotk Grant Program (CDBG), a Housing Assistance Plan (HAP). The HAP identifies the housing needs of various special groups, minority households, and also identifies the breakdowns between owner/renter househo ids and lower income households versus all households needing assistance. In the plan, lower income small families were cfted as being the largest household group needing assistance. As of April 1989, the HAP identified 1,419 lower income small families, 353 lower income large families and 174 lower income elderly families needing housing assistance. In addition to those households identified in the RNNA and HAP, the City has provided an assessment of the various identified special needs populations, including minority households, the disabled, senior citizens, single heads of households, and the homeless which are further discussed in Chapter 3. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 15 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Of these special need groups, the number of homeless are probably the most • difficult to determine. Based upon a survey of local law and code enforcement agencies, social service offices as well as local churches and informed citizenry conducted in January 1990, the Planning Division has determined that there are approximately 25 persons or less on an average daily basis in need of shelter. The City's Development Code currently does not include designations which specifically allow the development of shelter facilities, although it is possible that existing definitions in the Code for Group Care Facilities and Residential Care Facilities may be interpreted for this use. Asa result, the City should evaluate existing Code definitions and requirements to determine those conditions and standards where types of shelter facilities can be located, fncluding review and evaluation of industrial districts. It is the overall identified need of tar and very low income households and special needs populations that the majority of the Housfng Element programs are targeted for Tn the provision of direct monetary assistance, • rehabilitation programs, or the encouragement of affordably priced housing. VIII. ENERGY COISERYATIOM OPPORTUNITIES The State of California established basic energy efficiency standards for residential structures in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code which became effective in June of 1983. These energy specifications require both active and passive energy features for all residential developments. In addition to the state requirements, the City has also included, as part of the Development Code, passive and active solar energy requirements. IX. EXIS?IN6 HOUSING CONDITIONS Overall, the housing stock of the City is in good condition. Approximately one percent of the total dwelling units in 1980 had no plumbing or heating according to the Federal Census. This is probably attributable to the fact that all but 2,250 dwelling units have been constructed since 1960. . 16 bRAFT FOR 131SCUSSION I~URPOSES ONLY The City's Housing Assistance Plan (HAP), prepared in April 1989, estimated • that there were 646 substandard housing units, of which 538 were suitable for rehabilitation. According to City records and in coniunction with the Community Development Block Grant Program, five areas have been identified and targeted for rehabilitation assistance. These five areas are Tdentified on i'laD A-4 in the Technical Appendix. 8nphasis on rehabilitation programs to these five identified areas as well as throughout the City to maintain the sound quality of the housing stock are explored in the program section. X. CGNSTRAINTS 10 THE DEYFLOPIp1T BF HOUSIM6 There are both public and private market constraints that interfere with the development of housing for all income levels. While there are some constraints generated by local, state, or federal government, there are also a number of constraints controlled by the market place. The City, through its attempts of reducing the local govermient constraints • and providing Sncentives for the Construction of affordable housing has prepared programs in the areas of subsidizing infrastructure, lowering land prices through land write downs, and providing density bonuses. There are, however, same constraints beyond the complete control of the City government such as school overcravding and conventional interest rates. It is clear that the cost of housing, including financing and production costs, have increased more rapidly than household income thereby pricing potential home buyers out of the market. Lower interest rates for both construction and purchasing would be a significant asset in providing affordable housing and there are ways that the local government can provide incentives which will help to reduce housing constraints and housing costs. Through such methods such as redevelopment tax increment monies the City can offer incentives and programs, as described in the Technical Appendix, to developers in the community so that a diverse type of housing and price mix can be provided. 17 ~bRAFT ~OTt I3ISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY XI. EYALUATIOH 8F THE HOUSING ELBIENT'S PAST GdIL, POLICIES, 0&IECTIYES, AND PROGIUILS • Through the last five years, the City has made strides toward accomplishing the Housing Element's goal through implementation of the stated objectives and related policies and programs contained in the 1984 Nousing Element. In many cases, the City has met or exceeded the proposed target for each program. However, as a result of this evaluation, areas where the City should continue to strive to meet the proposed target goal were identified including the attainment of a 30 percent capture rate and the greater utilization of the housing rehabilitation and repair loan program. In addition, the evaluation provided information regarding those areas where the City should revise its programs to better achieve the Housing Goal. These areas include updating the City's density bonus standards and the revision of the Development Code to allow mobile homes in all residential districts consistent with Section 65852.3 of the Government Code. A detailed discussion of this evaluation is provided in Chapter 3, Section XI. • The results of this evaluation have been incorporated into the revised objectives, policies, and programs which are provided in Chapter 2. 18 • DRAFT CNFPTER TYO iFOR QISCUSSION PURPOSES QN,Ly • I. 60AL, 118,lECTIYES, PGLICIES AID PR061lMIS The goal, objectives, policies, and programs outlined below shall act as a guide for the City in its efforts in providing decent, affordable housing and its encouragement of a variety of housing types. In order to move towards attaining the overall housing goal through the corresponding objective areas, the City must commit itself to specific action programs and stated policies. The housing goal has been broken down Into nine (9) objective areas: (1) To Provide Quality, Mell-Functioning Environments; (21 Conservation and Rehabilitation of Existing Housing Stock; (3) Q~p ortunities for a Broad Range of Nousing Types; (4) Provide Housing Opportunities for Projected Commercial and Industrial Employee Households; (5) Provide Housing Opportunities for Households of Low and Moderate Income and Special Needs Groups; (5) Promoting Fair Housing Practices; (7) Encourage • Residential Energy Efficiency; (8) Reduction of Governmental Constraints; and (9) Periodically Update and Monitor the Housing Element. The action programs listed below also include the maximum target number to 6e assisted (where quantifiable), the responsible agency for overseeing the program, the appropriate source of financing and the approximate time schedule. the action programs are the most feasible actions which this City can take in order to satisfy the identified housing needs described in Chapter 3, the 7echnicai Appendix. These programs are based on the present and anticipated resources of the City, as prescribed under Section 65583 (b) of the California Government Code, with the quantified targets being guidelines and not necessarily being requirements of the City. It is the City's policy of this plan to take a diligent approach in satisfying the housing needs of the existing and future residents. 19 DRAFT EOFY DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The overall goal of the Nousing Element,- for the most part, is ronsistent with • the goal of the 1981 Housing Element. The City shall provide OpporLmities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types for ail economic segments wishing to reside Tn the coimunity regardiess of race, religion, sex or income group. In addition to the objectives and action programs, the City has identified policy areas which contribute to the oursuit of the htwcinn ~~,i ?h=~~ policies assist to decision making Lava rd achievement of each of the nine objectives and the determination of specific program actions. The remainder of this Nousing Element is broken dodo into nine objectives which when combined with the stated policies are intended to meet the housing goal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. OBJECTIVE 1: Provide quality residential environments which contribute to a well functioning ca~munity by ensuring residential development which is not only attractive in design but which functions to protect the public safety and welfare, and provide benefit to the community. POLICY 1.A: To promote the use of development techniques which foster a continued high quaiity of residential design and construction and ensure the appropriate development of hillside areas. Program 1. A. 1: Develop a design guidebook which sets forth through illustration and examples design policies to guide new development. C~ 20 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Target: Citywide, new development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: This has been made a part of the work program for the 1990-91 budget and work toward completion of the guidebook is already undernay. Program 1.A.2: Continue to implement the City's Hillside Development Ordinance to insure that residential development in hillside areas is appropriate to the carrying capacity of the land, avoids development fn environmentally sensitive areas, minimizes adverse grading impacts through architectural and structural techniques, and preserves the natural Tandform characteristics. Target: New residential development in identified hillside areas. . Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning, Engineering, d Building E Safety Divisions Financing: General Fund, City Budgets Schedule: Oi-going Program 1.A.3: Through the protect development design and technical review process, continue to evaluate residential protects for safety concerns, including lighting, pedestrian movements, parking tot configuration and design, as well as unit design and orientation, particularly with regard to multi-family development. Target: Citywide, new residential development. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, including the County Sheriff's Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Financing: General Fund, City gadget Schedule: On-going 21 DRAFT ~'OR DISGI-lSaION PURPOSES ONLY OBJECTIVE 2: Conserve and isprove the existing housing stack, . including structures of hlsWric significance, and eliadnate the causes and spread of blight by encaunging the investwent of public and private funds in hosing rehabilitation and public tagrovsents. POLICY 2. A: To recognize the unique contribution to the City's heritage by historic structures through the development of programs to encourage Lhe preservation and maintenance of these struntu res. Progra 2.A.1: Develop a loan and grant program to encourage owners of historic properties to undertake appropriate maintenance and restoration to remeQy code violations. Target: CTtywide, approximately 5 structures may be assisted. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant t 520,100 annually. . Schedule: Cn-going POLICY 2.B: The City shall pranote the revitalization and rehabilitation of substandard residential structures. Program 2.B.1: Continue to evaluate and identify areas of the City with concentrations of older or deteriorating housing units which may be targeted for rehabilitation and improvement programs. Target: Identified areas Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant Schedule: On-going 22 , DF2AFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Progra~ 2.8.2: Continue to operate a repair grant program for seniors and disabled or handicapped persons for minor housing needs by providing grants of up to E5 ,000 to lower income owner occupants of single family residences including mobile homes. Target: 60 households, approximately 15 on an annual basis. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant, approximately ? E20,000 annually Schedule: 1990-1994 Progra~ 2.8.3: Operate a housing rehabilitation and repair loan program that offers both deferred loan payments and low interest loans to lower income households, excluding mobile homes. • Target: Citywide, approximately 24 low income households (6 households/year) Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Grant, approximately *580 ,000 annually Schedule: 1990-1994 POLICY 2.C: In order to improve living environments and prevent neighborhood deteria ration, the Lity shall promote efforts to ensure that all neighborhoods of the City, including older, deteriorating ones have adequate public/community facilities and services. Program 2.C.1: Continue to provide public improvements/community facilities such as street improvements, street lights, sidewalks, parkway landscaping as well as park facilities in qualified target areas. 23 Target: Citywide target areas as identified. • Responsi 6le Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning 6 Engineering OivTstons Financing: Community Development Block Grant, approximately !5200,000 annually Schedule: On-going PoLICY 2.D: The City should promote the maintenance of existing sound quality housing. Progra~ 2.D.1: Utilize concentrated Code Enforcement programs to target speciflt areas or problems when the need and community support warrant sueh activity. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Ra nc ha Cucamonga, Planniny Division, Code Enforcement Section Fina nr.i nq: General Fund, City Budget • Schedule: On-going Progra~ 2.D.2: Develop an outreach referral program whereby owners of properties identified through Code Enforcement activities which may have structural or maintenance problems shall be directed to contact the CDBG coordinator. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1992-93 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 24 DRAFT FOA DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Dh5F1CTIYE 3: Allor and create ner apportunlties which enable a • brad range of havsing types, msintain a balanced wpply of omershlp and rertat units and provide wfficient numbers of duelling units to accoamodate exported new household forfations. POLICY 3.A: The City shall continue prmnete efforts, through land use distrl6ution and iRleaentatian of development standards, which encourage the prevSSien of a mix of housing types, including conventional. mobile home and apartments within a variety of price ranges, which will ensure a range of housing alternatives and enable the City to achieve its share of the regional housing need as determined to the 1980 Regional Nousing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Program 3.A.1: Facilitate opportunities for a variety of housing types through the implementation of the Land Use Plan, • Development District Nap, and Community Plans on the remaining vacant land resources of the City. Target: 9,169 to 11,916 units Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: July, 1989 - 1994 ® 25 - DRAB FGft ~ISCi15S10U! PURPOSES ONLY • POTENTIAL UNR DEVELOPMENT THROWN iilM Dtw6bpnwM tl aow a PnYMw O7a9W N lut a Yrrr f~errY DrvrMpiwM N 74%d Pnvleu~ Omitln h lYl a Yrw f~nrt Iam1 tlnaaemat.a bo%a 0wray 76%a D.mp box a wmny 791E a w9.ay 1W_1hfaM egr]tlen l~mnlu~l Bbo99l~oYb) B~oCal 81oa6fu9M9l Fsa 61-1) 120.39 0 0 0 0 HR 1.1-2) 11&91 16 T7 27 tl VL (.1.2) 1092.31 2M 427 127 910 L (21) 116.99 1 W 226 290 339 LM (48) 360,50 799 913 117{ 1379 M (&1/) 587.57 1417 1814 2179 2173 MH(i421) 90.29 918 731 9N 1098 M (2h90) 43.115 .,jBC 4t2 R91 ~SS9 3791 1979 558{ 8508 Unl1a owrWCNd hom 7H/B9m 1/1/90" 1890 1890 1880 1890 Pmprnrr0 uNtt ananN in rwiwv oat/v9o•° 3s19 sst9 35iR 3519 . Eetlmafvl llw ywr po)actkf11989.1991 91&1 9787 10,992 11,918 ' fM.dopnw,rimrd r~prorY9~dtlrprMe,y9wMtlrlarM ErwnlYN rd l9i, rd Ybr,d m~ordumirlM/Wr •• F.vInrlW Imn O.p.nrr d Fire yrdi rtinrr "'PIrW,q DMron /'PP~~9 Program 3.A.2: The City shall review and amend provisions of Lhe Development Coda pertaining to mobile hones, c9nsfstent with Section 65852.3 9f the 6overtxaent Lode, to allow manufactured hones in all residential districts. 26 • DRAFT FOR CISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Target: Citywide _ • Responsible Agency: Lity of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule Program 3.A.3: Discourage the conversion of existing mobile home parks to other uses in order to maintain a valuable source of affordable housing by requiring the submission of a report detailing the impacts of any proposed conversion consistent with the provisions contained in Government ~oae Seciiun GSw.3.7. Target: All existing mobile home parks Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: On-going PDLIC7 3.6: To regulate the conversion of existing rental • apartment housing to community apartments, stock cooperatives or condominiums in order to maintain residential stability, prevent a decline in the supply of rental housing, and discourage displacement of residents. Program 3.8.1: Continue to maintain and administer a condominium conversion ordinance which establishes a maximum annual limit, defined as no ~re than one-half the number of multi-family rental dwellings added to the City's housing stack during the preceding year, for the number of multi-family rental units that may be converted to ownership type. 27 DRAFT Target: Citywide FOR ~1$CU$SION PURPOSES ON~ Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning DT vision Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: On-going OBJECTIVE 4: Provide sufficient opportunities so that it is desirable for 30 percent of the projected c~ercial and industrial employed households in the City to live and work in tfie City. POLICY 4.A: To promrote efforts which ensure that an adequate jobs/housing balance ratio 15 achieved in the City and subregion consistent with the goals and objectives of SCAG's 1989 Growth Management Plan (GMP) and the projected regional jabs/housing balance ratio. Program 4. A. 1: Implement a development monitoring system to determine • the income levels of future commercial and industrial employed households in the City in order to determine the affordable housing ranges for all household groups. The manitori ng program will require tommerciat and industrial enyloyers to provide the City with information on number of future employees, rate of hiring, jab classifications, wage and salary ranges, and the estimated number of workers to be hired that currently reside Tn the City. Information should be provided at the earliest possible stage in the review process or prior to occupancy. Target: 3D percent of all new employee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budaet Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule 28 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Program 4.A.2: The City wily make an econanic study of Rancho Cucamonga's existing mafor employers on an annual basis. The study will evaluate commercial and industrial employee salary ranges and place of residence. From this, employee incomes will be determined and compared to housing costs for the City. Target: 30 percent of all new employee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General FunA. f.ifv W,Anna Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule Program 4.A.3: Based upon deteMnatfon during the derelapnent rcriew process, companies which generate a large nua6er of la to moderate income emplcyees shall be required to investigate the posstbility of development an equity share program to assist eylgyees in obtaining local • housing opportunities. largei: 30 percent of all new eaployee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamoga, Punning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule Program 4. A.74: Develop a housing information program that will require, as a condition of approval, that local developers provide announcements to local employers of housing units for sale or rent 30 days prior to offering the units to the general public. Target: 30 percent of all new employee household formations Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: Add to the 1991-92 work program schedule 29 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 4.A.45: Continue to maintain and update the City's data base • management system, which monttors proposed residential, commercial, and tndustrial protects. Target: Not Applicable Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: On-going 0&iELTIYE 5: Provide housing opportunities rhich meet the needs of ail ecanaic segaents of the comaunity including very la, loti, and moderate income households and special needs groups. POLICY 5.A: Protect and expand the range of hausing opportunities available by location, price, and tenure to lower and moderate intone households. Development agreements • shall be used as a procedure with projects providing multiple affordable housing units which utilize incentives offered by the City. Program 5. A. 1: Continue to administer and develop Residential Mortgage Bond programs whereby law interest loans tan be issued to first time home buyers making at or below 120 percent of the established medtan income. Target: First time lower and moderate income home buyers Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agency Financing: Residential Mortgage Revenue Bond Program - Use to be determined based on demand and market conditions. Schedule: On-going 30 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Fragrmm 5.A.2: Multi-family mortgage revenue bond program, the City, in conjunction with the County of San Bernardino, shall continue to adninisier and develop new Residential Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond programs to developers of affordable multi-family projects. Target: Lower d moderate income renter households Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga in conjunction with the County of San Bernardino Financing: Residential Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Schedule: On-going Program S.A.3: Through the requirements of the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans, a maximum 15 percent density bonus may be provided for the development of low and moderate income housing in the following manner: far . all units built under the bonus program, one-third shall be for families earning 100 percent to 120 percent of the median income, one-third of those making 80 percent to 100 percent of the median income, and one-third earning 50 percent to 80 percent of the median income. The City shall develop a review and monitoring program in order to determine the number of affordable units provided on an annual basis and the utilization of the density provisions. Target: New ownership d rental household formations in the Terra Vista 6 Victoria Planned Communities Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga and Private Sector Financing: Public and Private Sector Cooperation Schedule: On-going 31 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Progrs S.A.i: The C1ty wiii_shall undertake a sWAy Ee Ae6ermine • wha6 measures eerlA he Eahen to further implement State Density Bonus Requirements contained to Government Code Section 65915 for development of lower income housing, The City rill proceed rith the development of an ordinance rithin the annual cork prograr schedule or within 90 days of recelring a project proposal utilizing density bonus provisions, rhithever cones first. Target: Determined at time of individual request. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Has been added to the 1990-91 work program schedule Pragra~ 5.A.5: In conjunction with the development review process, encourage private developers to utilize Fedaral rental assistance programs to assist those groups in need as • identified by the Housing Assistance Plan. Inforsatian rill be provided to the development coa~nity regarding Section 8 through the use of inforsstional doctaaents provided to applicants of aulti-family projects in the early stages of the rerier process. Target: 20 elderly families, 130 small Families, and 25 large families. Target to be reevaluated in 1992. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga and private sector Financing: Federal Rental Assistance Programs Schedule: 1991 32 lJ • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY program 5.A.6: Continue to wpport the use of a voluntary rent stabilization, known as the Mobile Home Park Accord, for mobile home parks past the current expiration date of December 31, 1991, as a means of keeptng rents at reasonable levels to ail ow continued affordability of this method of housing. Target: Existing mobile home parks Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Administrator's Office Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: On-going Progru S. A. 7: Develop and implement an affordable housing strategy utilizing the Redevelopment 20 percent tax increment fund that is consistent with provisions of the Western Center for Law d Poverty Agreement. Target: Lower and moderate income households in the following ranges: 1,518 to 3,036 units based on development costs for a 2 bedroom apartment and between 1,377 to 2,079 units based on a single family detached home price of 5150,000 Responsiole Agency: Redevelopment Agency Financing: 20 percent tax increment funding Schedule: 1990-2000 POLICY 5.8: 7o promote efforts to better define both the size and composition of the homeless population in order to more accurately assess existing and future needs. 33 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Program 5.8.1: The City shall monitor on an annual basis the number • of persons in need of shelter in Rancho Cucamonga on an average daily basis as well as the number and type of shelter services available at that time. Target: Identification of the homeless population Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1990-94 POLICY 5,C: Provide for and facilitate the provision of temporary emergency shelter and transitional housing ,opportunities. Program 5.C.1: Provide financial support toward Aevelopment of a transitional housing program. At a minimum, this program should involve direct subsidies in the form of grants and/or loans to be used toward housing entry • costs, including first and last months rent and security deposit. An expanded program would involve the longer term provision of shelter in Combination with job training, money management, and medical/mental health/substance abuse counseling. Target: Identified homeless populations Responsible Agency: Redevelopment Agency Financing: 20 percent tax increment fund Schedule 1992 Program 5.C.2: Encourage the continued provision of emergency shelter assistance to persons lacking shelter by local organizations, community groups, and churches. The City sha 11 provide assistance to these groups if requested, 34 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Target: Identified homeless population Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Community Development Block Drant Schedule: Dn-going Program 5.C.3: Evaluate existing code requirmments to determine those conditions and standards where various types of shelter facilities may be located, including review and evaluation of industrial districts. Target: Identified homeless population Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1992 PDLICY 5.D Actively support a m~iti-,jurisdictional comprehensive approach Tn addressing the needs of the homeless. • Program 5. D.1: Participate with adjacent camnuni ti es toward the provision of a subregional shelter program and encourage the County to develop a comprehensive homeless program. Target: Identified homeless population Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Public and Private Cooperation Schedule: 1991 PDLICY S.E: To recognize Lhe unique characteristics of the elderly and handicapped households by promoting efforts in furtherance of their special needs. r1 ~..J 35 DRAFT FOR dISCU3Sip-y QURPp~E~ 9f~lLY Programs 5.E.1: Continue to al law for the establishment of second units on single-family residential lots to provide • additlanal elderly housing opportunities pursuant to established zoning regulations. Target: Elderly population Citywide Responslble Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning and Building d Safety Divisions Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: On-going Programs 5.E.2: Continue to provide financial support toward provision of a senicr shared housing program which is conducted by Iniand Mediation. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency; City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning pivfsion Financing: Community Development Black Grant • Schedule: Dn-going Progra~ 5.E.3: Continue to enforce and regulate the disabled accessibility and adaptability standards contained in Title 24 of the California and Uniform Building Code as they apply to apartments and condominium/townhouse praiects. Target: The developmentally and physically disabled. Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Building a Safety Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: Cn-going OBJECTIVE 6: Promote equal housing opportunities for all econo~tc seg~ents of the coaaunity regardless of nce, sex, or religion. 36 • DRAFT' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONSY • fnJLIGT 6. A: The City shall-pursue programs that will reduce the incidence of housing discrimination within the City. Program 6. A. 1: Provide financial support for Inland Mediation Board, or a similar non-profit organization, which assists in the resolution of tenant/landlord disputes and housing discrimination. Target: Citywide Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division/Private Contractor Financing: Community Development Block Grant Schedule: on-going OBJECTIVE 7: Require energy efficiency in all residential • developments. POLICY 7. A: Increase public awareness of and encourage the utilization of energy and resource conservation measures through the continued enforcement of the State energy code and City development regulations as well as through the developaent of public information and policy statements, Program 7.A.1: Continue to enforce and regulate the existing State residential energy design guidelines through existing California State and Uniform Building Code. Target: A11 affected residential development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Building d Safety Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: Lh-going 37 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOS€S ©NLY Progrr 7.A.2: Continue to implement through the Development Code • energy efficient design procedures and specifications for such things as solar techniques, landscaping standards, house orientation, and sun angle exposure. Target: All new residential developments Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: Gn-going Progra 7.A.3: Continue to Increase the public's awareness and utilization of energy saving and resource conservation techniques through the use of public information brochures and by example, through the continued implementation of the Model Nome Landscape Policy and Xeriscape Drdinance. Target: A11 new residential developments Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: Not Applicable Schedule: On-going OBJECTIVE 8: Nhere possible, elhinate governmental constraints. POLICY B.A: To promote efforts to reduce procedural delays, provide infornwtion early in the process regarding development costs, and to charge only those fees necessary to adequately carry out needed public services and improvements. • 38 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Progra~ 8.A.1: The City shall _conduct a fee assessment study to • determine the necessary costs for the provision of adequate public services and improvements to insure the continued health, safety, and welfare of the community. Target: Citywide, new residential development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Development Department Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: Cn-going Prmgra~ 8.A.2: Continue to foster open communication with respect to City standards and procedures through preliminary project review, the provision of informational handouts, and articles in the community newsletter, "The Grapevine." • Target: Citywide, new residential development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Comwnity Services/Development Departments Financing: General Fund, department budgets Schedule: On-going Program B.A.3: 6emsider revising Evaluate established City processing procedures to a}}ew deter>ine whether expedited processing is possible for housing developments using the Redevelopment 20 percent set aside funds or for projects proposing a mimimNtm proportion of units affordable to lower incnne households. ® 39 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Target: New residential- development for lower and moderate • income households Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Redevelopment Agency Financing: Not applicable Schedule: Concurrent with development and implementation of the RDA Affordable Housing Strategy OB,IECTIYE 9: Periodically update and nonltar the Housing Element and evaluate its effectiveness in attainment of its gal, objectives, policies, and proaraas. POLICY 9.A: To evaluate and update the Housing Element on a periodic basis in order to incorporate provisions of the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing and Implementation Program, to monitor progress toward attainnent and implementation of the stated goals, objectives, and policies of the Element, and to ensure consistency with State Law. • Prograr 9.A.1: Upon adoption of the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy and Implementation Program, the Housing Element shall be revised as necessary to ensure consistency with the affordable housing program. Target: Lower and moderate income housing development Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, City Budget Schedule: 1992 Program 9.A.2: Prepare an annual report to the City Council to evaluate the City's progress toward implementation and attainment of the stated goal, oD,iectives, and policies of the Housing Element. 40 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ®NLY • Target: Citywide - Responsible Agency: CTty of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, Department Budgets Schedule: 1991-94 Progro 9.A.3: Prepare an analysis of existing assisted housing developments that are eligible to change to non-low- incame housing uses during the next 10 years consistent with the requirements of Senate 8i 11 1282, 1989, pertaini na to Section 65583 of tha fnvor„mn.,r Code. Target: Assisted Milti-Family Rental Dnit Responsible Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division Financing: General Fund, Department Budgets Schedule: 1992 r~ L 41 - oRa~-r' F'OR AISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • ~phR 't1~E ~~wptcta wz~ rseEKOCx 0 FoR DISCUSS o~~ N PURPggE~ QNLY TABLE OF CgITENTS CHAPTER THREE INTRODIICTIDN .............................................A-1 II. PBPULATION CHARACTERISTICS ...............................A-2 Demographics ..........................................A-3 Employment ................... .........................A-13 SII. NDUS[N6 CNAAACTERISTICS ..................................A-18 Existing Housing and Prosections ......................A-19 Persons Per Household .................................A-23 Owner/Renter Characteristics ..........................A-24 Vacancy Rates .........................................A-24 Income ....................... .............. ........... A-25 Percentage of Incase Spent on Housing .................A-28 • IV. HWSIM6 DEMAND ...........................................A-34 Regional Housing Demand ................ ...............A-35 Local Housing Demand ........... .......................A-35 V. VACANT LAND INYEMTDRT ....................................A-41 Vacant Residential Land ........... ....................A-42 Lands Suitable for Affordable Housing ..... ............A-49 YI. HDUSIN6 AVAILABILITY ................. .. ..................A-51 Recent Construction ............... .. ..................A-52 Costs Associated Nith Housing .........................A-55 Short-Tenn Pro,~ected Types and Tenure of Housing......A-57 Planned Communities ...................................A-58 Condominium Conversions .... ...........................A-62 Fair Housing .................. ........................A-63 Senior Shared Housing .................................A-63 Density Bonuses .......................................A-64 DRAF'T' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mortgage Revem~e ,°..^nd ?r~u<jrams ........................A-64 • Redevelopment Agency .................... ..............A-65 Mobile Home Park Rental Agreements ....................A-68 VII. HOUSING ASSiSTAMCE NEEDS ...................... ...........A-70 Regional Housing Needs Assessment .....................A-71 Housing Assistance Plan ......... ......................A-75 Community Development 81ock Grant Program .............A-76 Special Needs Populations .............................A-79 Minority Households .............. ..................A-79 Senior Citizens ....................................A-83 Large Families .....................................A-83 Single Heads of Households .... .....................A-84 Hamel ess ...........................................A-86 Fa rmworkers ........................................A-87 Existing Affordable Projects with the Potential to Convert to Market Rate Rents ..................A-84 . VIII. EMER6Y CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES . .......................0.-93 Title 24 ..............................................A-94 Development Code ......................................A-94 IX. EXISTING HOUSING GpfDI770115 ..............................A-96 Housing Conditions ....................................A-97 Housing Code Enforcement ..............................A-100 X. CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEYELOPMF]IT ff NOUSING ................R-102 Governmental Constraints ........... ...................A-103 Land Use and Zoning ................................A-103 Building Codes and Enforcement .. .. .................A-105 Residential Review Process .........................A-106 Schools ......................~.................,...A-107 Development Fees ...................................A-109 Annexations ........................................A-111 • ii DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Mater Supply .............-....................,.....A-111 Sewer Systees ......................................A-112 Flood Protection ......... ..........................A-113 Market Constraints ....................................A-115 Land and Construction Costs ........................A-116 Financing ............... ... ........................A-118 XI. EVALUATION OF THE NOIISIN6 ELEINiNT'S PAST 6QN., POLICIES, OB.IECTIYES, AND PROGRNIS ....................A-119 fiLOSSARY .................................................A-146 • iii DR,4F-I' FOR DI$CUSStpN ?URPOSES ~!YiLY LIST OF FIGURES TABLES AND NAPS , , Page Figure A-I Population Trends to Rancho Cucamonga since 1960 ............ ..................... ..... A-4 A-2 Rancho Cucamonga, Distribution of Populatt on by Age Group - 1980 ....... ..... . ..... A-9 A-3 San Bernardino County, Distribution of Population by Age Group ................. .....A-10 A-a Ethnicity - 1980 .............................. .....A-11 A-5 Nousing trends in Rancho Cucamonga ............ .....A-19 A-6 Distribution of Dwelling Units by Structural Type - 1980 ..................... .....A-20 A-7 Distribution of Households by Source of Income - 1960 ........................ .. . .. ...A-27 A-8 Mortgage Costs per Month - Cwner Dccupted - 1980 ............................ .....A-29 A-9 Gross Rent Payments - 1980 .................... .....A-30 • A-10 Owner Households Paying 25 percent or Greater on Housing - 1980 .. ................ .....A-32 A-11 Renter Households Paying 25 percent or Greater on Housing - 1980 .. ................ .....A-33 A-12 Distribution of Camnute TipM•s ................. .....A-39 A-13 Computing Mode of Workers 16 Years and Oider ......................... .....A-40 A-14 Annual Number of Housing Units Permitted .................................. .....A-53 Table A-1 Population Trends in Rancho Cucamonga Since Incorporation ..................... ........A-7 A-2 Ethnic Distribution by Schoal Di strlct ..... ........A-12 A-3 Employee Characteristics - '980 ........... ........A-14 A-4 Piace of Nork, Head of Household - 1479.... ........A••16 A-5 Employer Survey - 1989 ... .................. ........A-17 A-6 Housing and Population Growth Trends ....... ........A-21 A-7 Housing Occupancy 8 Vacancy Rate Trends.... ........A-22 A-8 Persons Per Household, City and County Trends ........................... ........A-23 iv FOR DISCUSS ON PU RPOSES Qy~ Y 25- i98u " A-9 ................n- Yacancy Rate By Mousing type - A-10 Survey Results of Apartment Rents - • as of January, 1990 .................. ...........A-37. A-11 Pro,~ected Commercial 8 Industrial Household Generation at Build-Oit . ..............A-37 p-12 Pro,~ected Unit Development frdn Vacant Uncommitted Land for the Entire Lity at Build-out.... .......A-42 A-13 Protected Unit Oevelapment by Planning Area. .. .. ...q-43 A-14 Estimated Total Number of Households and Population At Build-Dut .....................A-45 s_i5 potential Unit Development through 1994............A-48 A-16 Residential Construction Trends from 1979 through 1989 ....................... ...A-54 A-17 Average House Price by Zip Code as of January 1. 1990 .................................A-55 A-IB Summary of Terra Vista Affordable Housing Housing Study ...................................A-61 A-19 Current and FuWre Households Needing Assistance ........... .. ... ......................A-72 A-20 Income Ranges for Riverside-San Bernardino MSA and Rancho Cucamonga ............. ...........A-73 . A-21 Minority Households In Substandard Housing.........A-80 A-22 Minority Households Requiring Rental Assistance ................................... ...A-80 A-23 Distribution of Disabled Population ................A-82 A-24 S?ogle Head of Households by Aae a Sex Paying More Than 30 Percent of Gross Income on Housing ...............................A-85 A-25 Assisted IUlt1-Family Housing Units ................A-90 A-26 Need for New Residential Construction 6 Special Needs Populations .......................A-91 A-27 School Fees for Commercial/Industrial and Residential Development Required by Rancho Cucamonga School Distracts - May 1990...........A-108 A-28 Residential Derelopment Fees .......................A-110 A-29 Estimated Land Costs by District - 1984........,... A-116 A-30 Estimated Land Costs by District - t989............A-117 • v DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPO$Fg pN~~ • MAP A-i Hegi onai Housing Market Area ....... ......... ....... A-6 A-2 Vacant Land/City MaD••••• .....................~.....A-50 A-3 Mean Value of Housing Dy Zip Code ..................A-56 A-4 Target Areas for Housing Rehabilitation - 1989..... A-78 A-5 Median Age of Housing Stock ........ ................A-98 A-6 Flood Controi Master Ptan of Development...........A-114 vi - DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY INTPoDDUCTION • The following technical appendix data is intended to provide the assessment of housing needs, constraints, and an inventory of resources for the promotion and development of housing. This Technical Appendix is aimed at providing the background and technical conclusions for the develo Anent and preparation of the cammuni ty's goal, quantified ob~ecti vas and five year housing program. This portion, Chapter Three of the Houstng Element, the Technical Appendix, should be used in conJunctfon with Chapters One (Housing Element sunmary) and Two (Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs] so that a caoplete overview of the City's housing assessment can be understood. A-1 FoR ~j~cus~j~~ puRpoSES ONLY • II. POPULATION f]IARIICfER15TICS This section provides demographic information relative to past and Future population growth trends, age distribution, and ethnic background. In addition, employment data is discussed including employment by industry, occupational characteristics, and commuting patterns. The fallowing are the highlights: * The City's population has increased 136 percent since incorpo rati an, from 44,600 in 1978 to 105,292 in 1989. " New household formations tend to 6e younger in age and the number of persons per household is decreasing. " The ma,jarity of heads of Irouseholds work outside of Rancho Cucamonga. An estimated 11.7 percent of employees surveyed in 1989 • live and work in the Lity. " Based on a vacant land study, the City's build-out population is estimated to be between 157,019 and 163,228. • A-2 FOR dISCUSS py p RP • liemoaramhics _ i}SLs$ Q(~I,Y The City of Rancho Cucamonga is iota ted in the San Bernardino-Ontario Regional Housing Market area, as shown on Map A-1. The area encompasses Regional Statistical Areas (RSA) 21, 28, 29, and 45, which are used by the Soulhern California Association of Governments (SLAG) to protect population, housing, and employment growth in this area. This housf ng market area is in one of the fastest growing regions in Southern California. Between 1970 and 1980, the region increased in population by 25 percent to 914,700. In Rancho Cucamonga the population increased from 16,043 to 55,250 during the same time period, the rapid growth in Rancho Cucamonga was directly related to a decade of residential and economic development in Orange and Los Angeles Counties, which increased housing costs dramatically as land became less available and more expensive. In response to the continued pressures to develop, employers and home builders looked eastward toward the western end of San 8erna rdi no and Riverside Counties where land was available and less ezpensive, as compared to Los Angeles and Orange Counties. A. Population: The population of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of January 1989 was estimated to be 105,292 according to the State Department of Finance. Figure A-1 shows the population growth in Rancho Cucamonga since 1%0 and Table A-1 shows the annual population increase since incorporation, in November of 1917. The City's population has intreas ed approximately 136 percent since incorporation and the growth has accrued at an annual average rate of 8.2 percent over the last eleven years. The greatest population increase occurred from 1915 to 1980 when the average growth rate per year was 22 percent, with a second peak occurring from 1986 through 1989 during which time the population increased from 73,780 to 105,292 at an average annual rate of 12.5 percent. •' 1 A-3 0 U O U C •,~w w C Oo Q ~ ~ T ~ ~- U rn O c ~. a ~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ~~ ~ a, 9 C W m O L F- C a a O a ' tii of I A ~ I ~ ~ I i 1 1 I I ~ y I i • ~ I i ', I m i j ' ~ ! A i ~ ~ ~I '. m ~ m o~ 0 'N ~ ~ ~ N N N I ~ ~ ~ i e O CI I n N N Q~ N N ~ ~ N N O ~ N ~ ~ r ~ ~ rn ~ r Q W Y r w E ~ b W r ~ S = S O ¢ c h y r N _ e . LL (n G ~ G ~ t0 ~ E r °'• ~ ~ ~ oWm r L N c ~ u a~ ~ V ~. > ve ~O p W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ x 'ti ; ~D tp 'a N O ~ t0 et N ' r r r r u n a o o ~ wam • • L A-4 DRAFT" FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • SCAG's last adopted poWlation pro,j ecti on for the City provided in the 1982 Modified Growth Projec tion predicted that the City's pa pulation would be 84,000 by 1988 and 127,500 by the year 2000, However, as of January 1, 1488, the City's population was es tlmated to be 94,614 by the State Department of Finance. This indicates that the City is 12.6 percent above its SCAG 1982 projection. An interruption in this otherwise steady growth pattern occurred in the period from 1980 through 1984 when the growth rate declined dramatically to a yearly average of 2.9 percent. This decline was attributed to si gntfica ntly increased housing costs created by high interest rates and the general economic recession that the entire nation was experiencing. Based upon the City's vacant land survey, caopleted in December, 1989, as shown in Table A-14, the Drojjected build-out population for Rancho Cucamonga, assuming 2.4 persons per household with a 5 percent vacancy rate, i5 estimated to be between 157,079 and 163,228, assuming a 50 percent and 75 percent development density, respectively, which is between a 49 to 55 percent • increase from the 1989 estimate of 105,292. This represents a difference of approzi mately 29,579 to 35,128 residents from the SCAG 1982 estimate of 121,500 for the year 2000. This difference is due to the fact that the SLAG estimate is only projected to the year 2000 rather than build-out. It is likely that the City will not reach build-out until sometime after 2010, probably closer to 2015 or 2020. This is due to the inevitable stowing of development that will occur as more easily developed land is built out. A-5 Z m _ U/ 7 < Y ~ m C d DRAFT ~ _ _ g 4 z 7~ S CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ~ a 4 g'~ 2 ~ ~ i ~ w FOR DIS F ~~ ~ u W ~O Y ~~ xm m (~ym NNNV a C W 4 ,~ ~~ ~ 7 ~ '~ ~`~ i • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • TABLE A•1 POPULATION GROWTH TREND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINCE INCORPORATION (NOVEMBER 1971) Year pgpllletlgp 461ncrease 1978 44,600° # 1979 49,540" 11.0 1980 55,250"' 11.5 1981 56,887 2.6 1982 58,662 3.5 1983 59,935 2.2 1984 61,742 3.0 1985 65,695 6.4 1986 73,760 12.3 1987 80,420 9.0 1988 94,614 17.6 1989 105,292 '11.3 • Average Increase 8.2 Average Increase Over Last Four Years 12.5 ' Cfly of Ranctw Cucamorpa, Estimated popuial'on " Cay of Rancho Cucamorpa, Special Cenws "' Federal Census Ap Other Figures, Stale Oepenmenl of Finance A-7 DRAFT y, ,eye; F"3R 'J{$CUSSi6Pv PUF~I~~SES C`7NLY • Figure A-2 illustrates the City's age distribution based on the 1980 census. The median age in Rancho Cucamonga in 1980 was 26.6 years. An examination of the average for both males and females combined for each age group, in relation to 1919 Department of Finance data, shows the pro portion of the population under five years rose slightly from 9.3 percent to 10.9 Dercent. The 5-19 age group dropped from 31 percent to 21.9 percent. The 45-64 age group dropped from 15.8 percent to 13.2 percent, while the 65 and over category also decreased fras 6.9 percent to 4,1 percent. These trends indicate relative stability in the younger age groups (under 19 years) with a decrease in the 5-19 age group caused by persons moving up to the age 20-34 category. The middle age groups 20-34 and 35-44 are nil dly increasing in proportion and the older age groups, 45-64 and 65 and over are dee reasing in preps rtion to the rest of the population. in comparison to San Bernardino County, Rancho Cucamonga's population Ts younger in ail age groups and considerably so in the 45 and over categories. However, it should be noted that recent studies have indicated that in the aggregate, our nations population is aging. It is therefore likely that the 1990 census will find that the City of Rancho Cucamonga's po pulatton in Lhe 35 and older age categories have increased in proportion to the other age groups. A-8 6R ;FT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY i ~~ ~~ ~ • 0 T N rn Q a (~ ~ ~ c C« Q 0 Ua ~ w U° N c a o0 ~ ~ ~ U~ .` rn ~ y ~ ~ ~ c 0 m n O a u~ m a~ a ~ a E a ~ b ~ LL ~ O e ~ ~ ~ d ' d m o ~ N a a i a m a 0 V 0 a 4 v 0 h A-9 o u> o in o u> l7 N N r r O c~ T ~ i Q ~a L M~ ~ W ~ ~ a (!1 a° ~+- o ~ O o Q >+;. ^, ~^^~ ^_ ` l~ Y 7 ~ }~ Cf O ui i,% U o c~ Q Y 7 a 0 a_ 0 M a m io e m ~ ~ v E a LL ~L 'tlIJll1 V Y ~ ~ d Q A N Y m v J ~ 0 tl V 0 m a 0 N • DRAFT FOR DIST'USS[0I~ PURPOSES ONLY A-10 .n o ~n o ~n N N ~ ~ DRAFT C. €thnicijyr F6Ft L)ISOUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Figure A-4 shows the population percentages by race in Rancho Cucamonga. According to the 1980 census information on rate, 87 percent of the population is Caucasian, 2.2 percent Black, .7 percent American Indian, Eskimo, and Aleutian, 2.1 percent Asian and Pacific Islander, and 7.9 percent other races. In terms of ancestry as opposed to rate, 16.3 percent of the total City population was of Spanish origin. This category includes persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, and other Hispanic backgrounds. It should be noted that of those with Spanish ancestry, 55.2 percent are Caucasian, .4 percent are oiacK ana 44.4 percent are of other races. Figure A-4 Ethnicity Caueaal~ 87% Am. Indian, Eskimo and Aleutian .7% Asian and Pacific lofander 2.i% Black 2.2% ther 7.9% Race s..,<.: tsso c..... A-ll DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY carne indita C4un 5f Ehe Current ethn{C diitri Bali G,i of thr City Flrdy bE fSUFld by examining the ethnic distribution of the four school districts in Rancho • Cucamonga as shown in Table A-2. Information obtained from the Alta Loma, Central, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda school districts indicate that overall 72 percent of the school age population in the City is white, 19 percent Hispanic, 5 percent black, 2 percent oriental/asian and 1.7 percent all other groups. TABLE A•2 ETHNIC DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE 1887-1988 SCHOOL YEAR School l2ltltltl Cauea»lut ~.C% EthNCIMMaIry ~d1 hhpnb ~ Bhdt 1l9.L'J4 OUwr J19,Oi ARa Loma 4858179.2 1270/20.7 787/12.8 291/1.7 212/3.1 • Central 2795/71.2 97328.8 B7S17.9 175/4.8 123/3.2 Cucamonga 719/14 957/88 718/42 170/10 69/1.0 Etiwanda 1075!87 526133 39421.8 59/3.8 7314.5 TMaI 9477n2 372828 255u19 695J5 47713.6 Sou,cs: Npiuidwl Schod dxnaa • A-12 faoi o~ent D DAFT • FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Based on SCAG's Growth Management Plan of February 1989, the Nest San Bernardino Valley is projected to be one of the five most rapidly growfng SCAG subre gionsl, in terms of employment, 6y the year 2010, with an expected increase of 133 percent. This is compared to recent Li ty projections in which employment is expected to increase from a SCAG estimate of 25,338 in 1981 to 99,8982 by the year 2015, or build-out, for an overall increase during the period of 294 percent. At the time the 1980 census was taken, 45.1 Derce nt of the total population, or 24,930 were employed. It is likely however, that this percent has increased as studies have found that there is a larger proportion of dual wage earner households as more women have entered Lhe labor force in recent years. Table A-3 shows Lhe type of industries and occupations these residents of Rancho Cucamonga were associated with in 1980. The two largest percentage groups are durable manufacturing, 17.9 percent, and retail trade, 17.3 • percent. The remaining employees have a broad spread of work affiliation, the largest being education, construction and health. 1 The Southern California Association of Governments Region includes the Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. There are 25 subregions defined by SCAG in the 1989 Regional Growth Nanagement Plans, of which Rancho Cucamonga falls into the Mest San Bernardino Valley Subregion. 2 The build-out estimate is made up of future employment projected as shown an Table A-11, and added to the 1987 estimate. A-13 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TABLE A~ • EMPLOYEE CHARACTERISTICS-1980 Total Population 55,250 Total Employment 24,930 I~LitgC Agriculture 501 P.ftLS3tlIt 2.0 Construction 1,760 7.1 ivianuractunng: Nondurable 1,387 5.6 Durable 4,464 17.9 Transportation 1,043 4.2 Communication 1,077 4.3 Wholesale Trade 1,143 4.6 Retail Trade 4,322 17.3 Finance 1,593 6.4 [iusiness!Repair 1,097 4.1 Personal Professional: 730 2.9 Health 1,669 6.7 Education 2,05? 6.2 aner 807 3.6 Public Administration 1,258 5.0 FAanageriai Administrative 3,427 13.7 Specially 3,163 12.8 TechnicaUSales: Technitions 644 2.6 Sales 3,188 12.8 Clerical 4,026 16.1 Service 2,633 10.6 Farming/Forestry 386 1.5 Cratt/Repair 3,926 15.7 OperetodWborer 3,517 14.1 Source: 1980 Feaerol Cerroue A-34 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY fit Ctlpa ti Lnal tharSG ter?SL?CS 3150 Show a bNad Spread within Vari pUS • categories, The single largest group, 16.1 percent are clerical positions within the technical/sales field. Craft/repair ,lobs are also prominent wfth 15,7 percent. Other signifi ra nL occupations are administrative managerial 13,7 percent, specialty managerial 12.8 percent, and sales positions 12.8 percent. The State Department of Finance special census conducted in 1979 looked at places of work far heads of households in Rant ho Cucamonga as shown in Table A-4. Just over 31 percent of the household heads worked in los Angeles bounty. Nnotner ci,c pe, ~m,i. ,wi ~cu i.u.a:C :` ~4~ rig ~ anA In San Rann ardinn or Riverside Counties. The 1979 survey indicated that 12 percent of the heads of households worked and 11ved in Rancho Cucamonga. In 1980, based on commuter patterns and trends of the Federal census, it Mas estimated that appro zimately 10 percent of the po pul anon worked and lived within the City. A recent survey of 21 ma~pr employers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, conducted in January 1990 as shown in Table A-5, found that 11.7 percent of the employees surveyed lived and worked in the City. As a result, it would appear that commuter patterns have not changed significantly since 1980. However, this survey did not evaluate the number of employees who may be living and working within the City's entire subregional area. In addition, the amount of commercial and industrial development has not kept pace with housing growth as over half of the eommercf al, (64 percent), and industrial, (62 percent), lantl was vacant as of 1987, Therefore, it is anticipated that in the camin9 years the amount of employment in the City will increase, thereby allowing for a larger capture rate. \J A-15 t~t~>=`r TABLE A-4 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. • PLACE OF WORK OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 1979 L>~n Los Angeles County Hcuaah4ld 2 4,872 tt:~nt 31.3 . San Bemardino/Riverside County' 4,187 27.2 City of Rancho Cucamonga 1,858 12.0 Orange County 624 4.0 San DlegWlmpariel County 23 0.2 aner' 3,931 25.5 • excarauip tlw cay a Rargho cocemorga •• IncArdas 13.8% rq reaponaa and not ehewhero WasNbd, and 11.9% na in labor force Source: SWe DepanmaN a FkierlCa Spatial Canaua (April, 1978) • • A-16 DRAFT . TABLE A3 ~OR_r7iSCUS510iV PURPOSES ONLY, EMPLOYER SURVEY RESULTS -1999 Total Number of Employers Contacted by City 21 Number of Employers Responding to Survey 13 Response Rate Percentage 61.9% Total Number of Employees From the Respondent Firms 5,414 . -.... . ............ r, .-u,yw~ow u.u y m ,.m,unu vuwuruuya oa 1 Largest Employer (General Dynamics) 3,486 Average Number oT Employees Per Respondent Fmn 416 Median Number of Employees Per Respondent Fnn 169 • Percemage of Total Employees Living in Rancfto Cucamonga' 11.7% Median Percentage of Employees Living in Rancho Cucamonga" 12.0% Average Percentage of Employees Living in Rancho Cucamonga"' 19.3% • Calwtated by dividkq the total number of employees Fvirq in Rancho Curamorge M the total number of empbyees hom the 13 resporWeM lima, 631 - 5,414. 1 i.7% •• CalwWted by taking the median percenage rpure based on ail ate reporWera timts' percentage of empbyees Wire in Ranches Curamoruga "' Calculated by taking the average percenage figure from each fimt based on all the resporwem firms. In this rase, the average figure is higher benuae there are one or Mro erinlbr fume that have a large percentage of employees livirug in RartcM Cucamorpa tlws akewug the average upward. soume: Williams-iwebeibedc a Associates, Inc. m the Draft Anordable WoUSing Stategy A-11 []RAFT iii. iiWSIM6 LHApACTfgIST[fS FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES QNLY. This section provides information regarding dwelling !~niL growth, bath past and present, and general demographics relating W housing and household growth. This related information includes such things as breakdowns of existing dwelling structural types, owner/renter characterfstics, vacancy rates, and household incomes in comparison to housing costs. the fol iow5ng four points are the highlights of th5s sectian. * The City's housing stock has increased annually by an average rate of 7.1X since 1980, and has averaged 11,6 percent per year since 1986. ' Of the existing housing stack in 1980 about ev ~~r_^~f was of ownership type. This trend Mi11 Continue to be the predominant housing characteristic. * Rancho Cucamon9a's median household income of 524,868 was higher than any other City in San Barn ardi no COUnty in 1980, t Significant numbers of lower income renter and owner households are r paying more than the recognized federal standard for housing of fords hii ity. A-18 DRAFT Existlna Housing and Pro3eettons F9R C')ISCU=5t0-y PURPOSES ONLY s - The 1980 Federal census established the total number of dwel iin9 units in Rancho Cucamonga to be 1],839. The De Dartme nt of Finance estimates for January 1, 1989 indicate a dwelling unit count of 34,449, as shown in Figure A-5. The 1980 census data breakdown of hau sing type is contained in Figure A- 6. As can be seen, the majority of housing units are single family, 50 • 40 30 20 Figure A-5 ~vi;aiily Trends in Rancho Cucamonga Since 1970 60 No. of Dwelling Unita (Thousands) 10 0 1970 ~.d ~~±^__ 67,01 f937 33,330 xx,t3o i t7,e3o taro 6 t36 i i _...J...__ .._~ 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Yeah eourc e: U.S. Cantwe, DOF, RNNA ProjecUone, City Eelimaln r~ a-19 Dr'2~F~ FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY, • ~ _ C ~ ~ T Q r T U ~ r-. y O a ~ m h ~ C O RI a lD +. ~ ~ ae Q V ,Q U 9 O ~ _ ~ .w ~ ~ ~ d ~ I.I. .~ ~ ~ ~ 7 O Z al T m m E 0 a 0 f m o y ~ N c b ~ ~ ~ ~~' _ .,~~II~~~, a ~ 7 r ~ j U d ~ c Y ,~ 3 N ,^ Q ~ v' a LL y • m ~ ijiujii~iill ~ ~ i r~~;i~ i~~ b ' did 1 1 ii 111 I~~ I m ii ~.!i~~~~i :~~~ O LL tq c d U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ f0 tD ~ N u 0 m • A-20 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Garaiieiing the preViausiy noted 'w"pulati m-, grcah from '-975 !o '9+30, the • City's housing stock also increased duri nq this same time period shown in Table A-6, The total number of housing units increased by 7275 units between 1910 and 1475 and increased by another 5369 units through 1980. In the period from 1980 through 1984, the growth rate lagged, a5 a reflection of the national economic recession, but picked up again 1n 1985 with the greatest increase in the number of new units, 12,259, occurring between 1985 and 1989. Overall, as shown in Table R-7, the City's housing has increased annually by an average rate of 7.7 percent since 1980, and has averaged 11.68 percent per year over the last four years. TABLE A~ • HOUSING AND POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS Y~ 1:1431910.a %Increasa Po Ihy at lion 961ncreese 1970 5195 16,043 8.5% 1975 12,470 140°k 26,262 64% 1980 17,639 43% 55,250 110% 1985 22,190 24`Y° 65,695 19% 1989 34,449 559; 105,292 60% Source: Federal Census and State t>apanment of Fnance A-21 bRAFT TABLE A 7 FOR 1315CUSSION PURPOS ES O - HOUSING OCCUP NLY • ANCY AND VACANCY RATE TRENDS FROM 1981 Y9H[ I4tBL % Incroasw ~yp~ VecaM % 1981 18,257 2.3 17,424 4.56 1982 18,505 1.35 17,894 3.30 1983 18,655 0.81 18,056 3.21 1 oae t o?(15 2.94 18,563 3.34 1985 22,190 15.54 19,892 10.36 1986 24,438 10.13 22,664 7.26 1967 28,949 18.45 25,270 12.71 1988 31,665 9.38 29,884 5.75 1989 34,449 8.79 32,391 5.97 • Average Annual Percentlncrease 7.74 Average Annual Percent increase Over Last Four Years 11.68 source: State CeparimeM a Finance SLAG estimates, contained in the 1982 Modified Growth Pro,lecti on estimate that there would be a total of 44,000 housing units in Rancho Cucamonga by the year 2000, However, as a result of the City's vacant land survey, as of December, 1989, it is estimated that there will be between 57,016 and 59,246 dwelling units constructed at build-out. These pro~ecti one are based upon development occurring at 50 and 75 percent of the allowable density ranges. 0 A-zz DRAFT' • Persons Per xousenold FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY According to the 1980 census there were 16,989 households in the City, or about 5.5 percent of the County total. The average number of persons per household was higher (1.3) in the City than the County (2.82). Table A-9 shows the number of persons per household in the City and County for the last 10 years. As can be seen, the rate for the City and County has stayed fairly constant over this time period. TABLE A-8 PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD, CITY AND COUNTY TRENDS ,y9gt Cln Rets Counri Rata 1980 3.03 2.82 1981 3.24 2.82 • 1982 3.32 2.87 1983 3.30 2.85 1984 3.31 2.86 1985 3.28 2.86 1986 3.25 2.87 1987 3.17 2.83 1986 3.16 2.82 1989 3.22 2.86 Source: Stale DepanrreM of Finance A-2 3 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY However, SCAG estimates that due to the_ aging of the population and decrease in the average hdusehold size of same ethnic groups that the region's average • household size will drop to 2.69 by the year 2010. As a result, SCAO also predicts that household size for Rancho Cucamonga will drop to 2.9 persons per household, assuming a 5 percent vacancy rate, by 2010. Owner/Renter Characteristics The majority of the housing units in the City are single family type and owner occupied. Figure A-6 depicts a breakdown of the percentage of owner versus renter occupt ed dwelling antis by structural type. Of all renter occupied structures in the City in 1980 approximately 53 percent are single family detached units, 13.6 percent are attached and those with 2 to 4 units in a building, 30.1 Dercent are structures having 5 or more units and 2.7 percent are mobile homes. Far owner occupied structures, 91.1 percent are single family detached units. The distributions depicted in Figure A-6 shoos a characteristic comaon to all communities, that single family detached units tend to be owner occupied and multiple family units renter occupied. . Yacancy Rates The 1980 Federal census did include some info~saati on on vacancy rates by dwelling unit type. According to the census, the Cf ty nod an overall vacancy rate of 4.8 percent, as shown in Table A-9. The vacancy rate for single family, both detat hed and attached unit types, averaged 5.1 percent, while it averaged 4.5 percent for multiple family units. Mobile home unit types experienced the lowest vacancy rate of 1 percent. With Lhe exception of the vacancy rate for mobile homes, these figures do not differ greatly from the HUD vacancy standards of 5 percent fur single family and 3 percent for multiple family. n LJ A-24 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY P.".e City's ;.verage :awncy rata f,~o~„ g8i io 1969 is shown in 7aDle A-7, as • estimated by the State De Dartment of Finance. Vacancy rates tend to be reflective of new construction activity as the rates tend to decrease during periods of low growth, as in the years 1982 through 1984, and increase during periods of rapid growth, as in the years of 1985 through 1987 when the average yearly increase of new dwelling units averaged 14.6 Dercent. TABLE A-9 VACANCY RATE BY UNIT TYPE AS OF 1980 R t V Unit Tvoa Q SF Detached gcuoled Unlts 14,447 Vacam UnRs 728 acancy e s 5% SF Attached 192 58 24% 2 Units 88 7 7% . 3 & 4 Units 279 33 11 5 or More Units 1,085 28 3% Mobile Home 888 6 1% Source: 1980 federal Cenws lnco~e Generally, households in Rancho Cucamonga are wealthier than those living in San Bernardino County proper. In 1980, Rancho Cucamonga had the highest median household income, (24,868, of all 37 tomounities and in the unincorporated areas of the County. This is Compared to the 517,463 median household income for the County as a whole. The City had the third highest A-25 DRAFT F4R DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY median famfly income, (25,731, as compared to the same group for 1988. Recent estimates provided by M117iams Kuebelbeck and Associates for 1989 indicate • that the City's median income, (44,126, has continued to be higher than that of San Bernardino County, (29,546, by a significant amount. in 1980, the most prominent source of Income was the standard wage or salary, with ,lust over 50 percent of all Income received by Rancho Cucamonga residents earned by this means. The next most common source for income is from interest and rent payments at 21.4 percent. Self-employed persons comprise approximately 6.9 Dercent of the population, while approximately 7.4 percent and 10.6 percent of the population received monies from social security and public assistance, respectively. Income levels in relation to the Income source for households within the City are graphically shown in Figure A-7. • r 1 U A-26 ~~ FOR DISC D~~ USS(O[.~ PURPOSES O~-(,y m r O ro m ro n m • _~ O O N ~ ~ O U ~ c O '~- ti ~ o ~ ~ d Q ~ L 7 ~I ~L ~ 3 .~ ~ ~ N m 'O OI L I( m !q O T~ 0 ~D a •~ ~ ~ U U L O ~ W O N ~ ~ ~ O m U m C c n E w m y T y P J3 O 0 a M d U 0 m m v `e 0 M A-ZI N V f7 N ~ DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Ro r2rty level i; defined by file Federal Census 8u reau as less Than 60 percent of Lhe national median heusehold income. As of 1980, approximately 5.5 perte nt (303) persons) of the total population of Rancho Cucamonga fell below the income poverty level. This represented 4.6 percent of the fatal number of families in the City. Percxntaae of Intoarc Scent on Housing The 1980 census provided information on mortgage costs and rental payments for residents of Rancho Cucamonga. This census data also indicated the amount, ana correspo ndtng parts ntages, of household incomes which went to pay for both rental and ownership housing and is shown in Figures A-8 and A-9 below. For both owners and renters, the Citywide median monthly pays'~ent was j838 and j342 respectively. • • A-28 DRAFT FOR L):~~±'SS:ON .DJRPOSES ONLY a O N n (A a m a Q ~ U~ a N~ U 0 _~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ 3 I.L ~ O ~ i I i i y ~ i I 9 ~ ~ ! I Oi i ( ^ ~ r % i o~' 2 0 o a o 0 0 +n o @7 M N N r r 07 n i O O ~D f9 ~ ~" O) C in N o E d ~ ~ ~ a ,, <~ o c o p ~~ N i O m 0 e d U 0 v U -J O N A-29 Figure A-8 FOi2 Discuss oN PURPOSES ON(• Gross Rent Payments - 190 Households % 3° 3C 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source; t980 Census Along with other cost of Living increases, the tost of housing has gone up since 1980. In a buyer profile compiled by Great Mes tern Real Estate, Tt was found that the median monthly payment of a new home purchased in Rancho Cucamonga in 1989 through their company was 51,200. This represents an increase of approximately 115 percent Since 1980. • A-30 ~~~~~ aiuu-Tys 5200-299 $300-399 6400-499 x500• Monthly Payment DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY In add+. ti on, in a rezent survey of ~7 apartment proiects completed by the • Planning Division in January, 1990, it was found that rental payme rtts in the City have also more than doubled since 1980. As shown in Table A-30, one- bedroom units typically range in price from 5450 to 5725 a month, while two bedroom units range from 5550 to 5195 a month, and three bedroom units range in price from 5625 to f915 per month. As compared to the fair market rent schedule for the Riverside-San Bernardino wSA used by NUD fn its Nousing Certificate Program; 5494 for aone-bedroom, 5577 for atwo-bedroom, and 5150 for a three-bedroom, rents in Rancho Cucamonga tend to be higher than the regional average. while the general monthly mortgage or rental paymen4 range ., 6npur Cani co snow in terms of meeting housing affordability, it is more important to inspect the percentage of income that goes to pay for housing costs. TABLE A•10 SURVEY RESULTS OF APARTMENT RENTS AS OF JANUARY 1990 Unit Total Avefep~ NeM Cost Avareya Ivoe Niilltlt4L RaM S Ranaa S BeRQSlLt Bachelor 200 507 410-595 250 1 + 1 BR 2799 568 450.725 250 2 + 1 BR 1209 643 550-750 300 2+2BR 1848 702 565-795 300 3 + 2BR 437 818 625-975 400 Total Number of UnRs: 6493 Total Number of Complexes Surveyed: 37 Source: City of Rancho Cucartnnpa PWmirq DNiabn A-31 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The percentage of a household's income spent nn ho~lslna costs can be a significant social economic indicator. The Federal OeparUaent of Housing and • Urban Development has established as a guideline that not more than 30 percent of the monthly gross income should go for paying housing casts. The 1980 census data does not provide a separate category of those paying below 30 percent rather a category of 25 percent to 34 percent and a category of 35 percent and aver was calculated and is shown in Figures A-30 and A-11. 100 80 60 40 20 0 Figure A-10 Owner Households Paying 259'0 Of Income or Greater on Housing % of Houaeholda ~ % Paying 25-34% ®% Paying 35%* Source: 19e0 Cenws • A-32 <SS SS-9.9 510-14.9 515-18.8 S20• Income Group (In Thousands) DRAFT Figure A-ii FOR D13CL'SSIaY PURPOSES ONLY ~ Renter Households Paying 25% Of Income or Greater on Housing % of Households 100, 87 ~ % Paying 25 - 34% ® % Paying 35%+ Recent estimates provided by SCAG in the "Revised Regional Housing Needs Assessment" of December, 1988, indicated that there are a total of 5,879 lower income households in Rancho Cucamonga of which 3,069, or approximately 10 percent of the total number of households, pay more than 30 Derce nt of their income for shelter. Of that number, 1,123 owners are overpaying and 1,346 renters pay more than 30 percent. The data shows that a significant number of lower income renter and owner households pay a disproportionate amount of their monthly income for housing. A-33 < $5 ~b - 9.9 S10 - 14.9 S15 - 19.9 $20+ Income Group (In Thousands) IM. NOOSI!!6 DEMARD FOR DISCUSSION UR¢OSE9 OhiLY This section provides information on the general need or demand for housing in • the future. This topic is covered both on a regional and locai level. The main factor affecting housing demand at the local level is expected to be the increase in employment base from both industrial and commercial developments. The following statements point out the highlights of this section. • Rancho Cucamonga is expected to have between 57,016 and 59,248 dwelling unite ah hail d-nur nn,..oee..~l .,. .. 1_-_---- _~ ._. ._. -__ -_ _ , _...> -.• ..r_. cum.. .,i Yc ,.F GII VJJ p11U (1.Y percent from 1989.3 ' Nigh employment growth from commercial and industrial development is expected to create a demand for 50,378 new workers of which between 5,894 and 15,113 are expected to live in Rancho Cucamonga. * Although currently a su bs to nttal percentage of residents turre ntly do not live and work in Rancho Cucamonga, this trend should be improved as . the City develops its industrial, commercial, and residential lands. ' Providing housing which is affordable for the projected employment base, so that more workers can live and work within the City, is desired. 3 In June of 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga Lity Council began a study to evaluate the City's residential land use mix in consideration of reducing the number of multiple-family units anticipated at build- out. Impacts that could result from the reduc icon of vacant, uncommitted multiple-family zoned land would be a reduction in the amount of higher-density multiple-family type of units, as Hell as an overall reduction in the total number of units at build-out. An estimated reduction of between 4,535 to 4,955 total units, which would be approximately an 8 percent reduction in the current projected number of dwelling units at build-out, could result if the City's current anticipated build-out unit miz of 64 percent single famiiy/36 percent multiple family is revised to achieve a 75 percent single family/25 percent multiple family mix. A-34 D f?.A!= T • Regional Housing Demand FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The Sgut hero California Assotiation of Governments (SCAG) prepares regional growth management forecasts for the Southern California regions, its subregion, as well as for individual communities on a Deriodit bases. In the 1989 Growth Management Plan (GMP), SCAG attempts to address housing, mobility and air quality through predicted growth patterns of jobs and housing throughout its region. The GMP indicates that an improved job/hou sinq balance, (a shift of new jobs to housing-rich areas and of new housing to job- rich areas), will help reduce further congestion and help improve air quality in the region. As stated by SCAG in the GMP, "Jobs and housing are in balance when an area has enough employment opportunities for most of the people who live there and enough housing opportunities for the people who Mork there. The region as a whole is then, by definition, balanced." in the GMP, SCAG predicts that the housing demand of the region will continue to grow. In fact, the GMP predicts that the po Dulation of the region as a • whole will increase 34 percent from 1988 to 2010 and that San Bernardino County will grow by 118 percent by the year 2010. In addition, SCAG predicts that the Nest San Bernardino Valley will have the second largest absolute increase in population of any subregion. With its fast growing population, Lhe West San Bernardino Valley was estimated Lo have a jobs/housing balance of .99 for 1984, which indicates a larger portion of housing over jobs. However, SCAG forecasts indicate that the number of jobs will increase faster than housing thereby resulting in a modified job/housing ratio of 1.16 by the year 2016, which will bring the subregion close to the ideal regional ratio of 1.22. Local Nousi ng Demand The major factor which will affect the demand for housing in the City is the expected employment growth in the commercial and industrial sectors, which also has an impact on the Community's jobs/housing balance. Based on SCAG's A-35 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY recent Oraft Li ty Projections (which are not adopted figures, but are intended for planning purposes) of March, 1990, Rancho Cucamonga was considered to be • job rich with an estimated jobs/housing balance of 1.004fn 1987, which is projected to increase to 1.805 at build-out. It is clear that the subregional ratio will be improved by way of increased employment growth in Rancho Cucamonga. Ouriny the next 20 to 30 years, the industrial and commercial areas in the City will generate a demand for approximately 50,378 housing units in the area as shown in Table A-11. This data is based on a study of square footage growth potential of the existing vacant, developable coiraerci al and Sndus tri al designated lands. Assuming a capture rate6 that will range from 11.7 percent (currently existing) to 30 percent (which is the City's goal) of locally generated employees, this will result in a housing unit need in the City of between 5,894 to 15,113 units respectively. Assuming the Li ty's goal of a 30 percent capture rate is achieved and that build-out will occur in approximately 25 years (2015), this translates into an average annual housing unit need of 605 dwelling units. 4 Jobs/Housing ratio based on the number of occupied households in 1987 estimated Dy the Depar4nent of Finance to be 25,270. Number of jobs far 1987, based on recent SCAG figures, estimated a total employment of 25,338. Total employment defined as total number of people who work in the City, but may live elsewhere, as well as in the City. 5 Job/Housing balance based upon the City's build-out po pulatian and employment projections with housing estimated at 55,225 based on a 62.5 percent density and 5 percent vacancy rate, and total employment at 99,898, which is the estimated 1981 employment for the City, 25,338, plus the projected build-out employment shown in Table A-11. 6 Capture rate refers to the pertentage of persons employed in the industrial and commercial sectors in Rancho Cucamonga who also have the opportunity to live in the City. The current capture rate is based upon a survey of local employees shown in Table A-5. J A-36 • I ~ ! Q T N m ~ ~ f" a E g h ~ N o m ~ ~ pp p g 1 Q @ ~ t , , ~ ~ ' Q H Q ~ ~ A Z ~ N mm W p 1f1 n 9 N tC ~ ~ ~_ 1 U O ~ ~~ y W y ~ o o g o w~ ! ~ li. = 3 °~ ~$ J 4 ~ ~ c _ g~ !D D ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ° _ ~' ~ 3 ~ F 2 .= m ~ o ao ~ ~ i O ~ 8 m J Q ~ m ~ ~ S s ti ~ ~ i ~ yJ ¢ ~ C N ~ (~ c i ~ y = 4 ~ W c 5 m o E ; 1 m~~ ~ G a e ~ ~ m n ~ 3 ~V ~ m w ~ w $ ~ >~~ Jw ~ a` ~ LL s 8 8 €~~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ d ~ $ a~ ~ w a d A- 37 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Based upon the number of housing units anticipated at 6u ild-out, there appears to be sufficient capacity available to meet the housing needs of locally • generated employees. The City's housing stock is expected to increase between 23,683 to 24,199 units from 1989 (34,449 units) to build-out (between 57,015 and 59,248 units) for an annual increase of between 947 to 991 units, as compared to the 605 units needed. As a step in determining the viability of making an effort to increase the capture rate, the City will make an economic study of Rancho Cucamonga's major employers on an annual basis. As part of this study, concentration will bx given to current industrial and commercial employee salary ranges. From this projected employee incomes will be estimated and compared to housing costs for the City. !t is hoped that this study can identify the mazfmum real istfc capture rate far the community. Establishing a realistic capture rate has two objectives. The first is to provide employment and adequate housing for persons who wish to work and live in this area. The second is to Dravt de employment and housing in proximity to one another so commuter patterns are lessened, thus having a beneficial domino • effect on air quality, transportation networks, pu 611c transit, and general energy efficiency. The trip to work fs one of the significant factors affected by an increased capture rate. According to the 1980 census, more than 55 peree nt of the 19,230 persons who did travel to work had a traveling time of 30 minutes or more. Figure A-12 graphically shows the commuting times for workers over the age of 16 who lived in Rancho Cucamonga and traveled to work fn 1980. Hhai is even more significant than this is Lhe mode of transportation which is used. Figure A-13 shows the variety of transpo rtati bn means available and the corresponding use by workers in ].980. The car was the dominant mode with 75.2 percent of the workers reporting that they drive alone. Vhile it Cannot be disputed that the car is the most convenient means of travel, it is hoped that the amount of travel time needed from home to work, as shown in Figure A-12 can be decreased with a higher capture rate than the present estimated 11.7 percent. • A-38 • DRAFT Figure A-12 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Distribution of Commute lime For Workers 16 Years+ Workers 96 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: 1880 Censu• A-39 10 10 - 19 20 - 29 30 - 44 45 - 59 60+ Minutes of Commute DRAFT • FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Figure A-13 Commuting Mode of Workers 16 Years i Workers 96 80 60 40 20 0 Sourc r: taBO Crrmw Mode of Commute An objective of the Housing Element Ts then to Drovi de housing opportunities to those people wfshing to live and work in the community as well as help the air quality, reduce future congestion and increase general energy efficiency. By achieving the highest Dossible capture rate of existing and anticipated workers, the City feels that this objective can be accomplished. A-4o Drive Alone Carpool Mass Transit Walk Other Work at Home DR,0.F'T FCR DISCI iS51Qh g;J}Z;a~ScS CNLY . Y. VACANT LMD IIIYEID ORI .. The mast prominent resource needed by a community in order to meet the demand for housing is vacant residential lands. This section describes this resource and includes descriptions of vacant residential lands in the general City, the twa planned communities and the sphere-of-influence. Lands feasible for affordable housing are also discussed. the following three points identify Lhe highlights of this section: * As of January 1, 1990, the City has 2,533.74 acres of vacant, uncommitted, residential land Suitable for development witm n cne bicy of which 724.81 acres or 28.6 percent will allow a residential density of 8 dwelling units per acre or greater. ' The tat al number of residential units in the City Mill be approximately 57,016 to 59,248 units at build-out which is expected to occur in 2015. ' Further growth in the area shown as the Planned Communities generally will provide a variety of housing opportunities through the boil d-out period. A-41 Y:c::t Residentiai land QR ~ FOR QISCUSSiOIy ;°URPQSES ONLY • within the City, there are approximately 3,281.46 acres of vacant and developable land fn the eight residential districts. Of that total, 2,533.74 acres can be considered uncommitted as there have been no applications for development submitted for these properties. The remaining 747.72 acres can be classified as committed, in that as of December, 1989, applications for development revi ea had been submitted for a total of 3,518 units, but had not been approved by the Planning Commission at that time. la tiles A-12 and 13 identify the density range of each district and the amount of uncommitted vacant land available in each category. Also shown is the potential number of dwelling units which could be built asswaing that the land is built-out at 50 percent and 75 percent of the density range of each district (13,261 and 15,493 new units respectively). • TABLE A-12 PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FROM VACANT UNCOMMITTED LAND FOR THE ENTIRE CITY AT BUILD-OUT Vacant Uncommitted Units at 5076 Units at 75% LBRd.~)34 ~9! Denalri Ranee Dana Ranee ER (.1-1dWac) 120.36 60 90 HR (.1-2dWac) 118.91 11B 177 VL (.1-2dWac) 1062.31 1057 1585 L (2-4dWaC) 146.85 441 514 LM (4-9dWac) 360.50 2163 2524 M (8-14dWac) 567.57 6463 7345 MH(14-24dWac) 93.29 1772 2006 H (24-30dWaC) 43.95 1187 1252 Totals 2533.74 73,261 15,483 • A-42 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TABLE A-13 PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY PLANNING AREA GENERAL CITY Vacant 18[I~ Uncommitted Units at 50% Q~nsltV Ranee Units et 75% Density Ranee HR (.1-2dWac) 118.91 118 177 VL (J-2du/ac) 334.18 332 49A ! (~ ;;,;:;a:~ aa.uc 177 207 LM (48dWac) 10.45 63 73 M (8.14dWaC) 94.24 1037 1178 MH(14.24du/ac) 13.98 266 301 H (24.30cu/ac) Q 0 0 ,__ Totals 630.82 1993 2435 • ETIWANDA ER (.1.1dWac) 120.36 60 90 VL (.1.2dWac) 562.73 560 840 L (2-4cu/ac) 87.79 263 307 LM (4-BdWac) 264.82 1589 1854 M (8.14cu/aC) 241,37 X65@ ~.1Z Totals 1277.07 5127 6108 TERRA VISTA LM (4.8dWac) 26.23 157 184 M (8-14dWac) 61.98 682 775 MH(14-24cu/ac) 54.36 1033 1169 H (24.30dWac) 29.74 _@Q$ _~4Z Totals 172.31 2675 2975 Continued... A-43 L3RHFi' • FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TABLE A•13 CONTINUED PROJECTED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY PU4NNING AREA VICTORIA Vecent Lt10d Use Uncommitted 9tiCll6lit Units at 50% J(y Renee Unite et 75% Dens Ranee LIVI (4-tlOWBC) by.UO 354 473 M (6-14dWec) 189.86 2080 2375 MH(14-24dWac) 24,95 474 536 H (24-30dWac) 14.21 ___3@4 X46 Totals 288.14 3302 3729 ANNEXED LAND VL (.1-2dWac) 165.40 164 246 L (2-4dWac) 0 0 0 LM (4-BdWac) Q _SZ ~ Totals 165.40 165 247 TOTALS 2533.74 13,261 15,193 • A-44 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • The potential number of units in the -City at build-out was estimated by combining the figure for potential units (13,261 and 15,493) from vacant land with the January 1, 1990 Department of Finance estimates for existing dwellings (36,339). Added to this figure was the nwnber of units approved by the Planning Commission in 1989 (1,454), the number of units for projects approved before 1988 that have not had building permits issued yet (1,229), and the estimated number of units for Drojecis currently in the review process (3,518). Finally, subtracted from this total are the number of units demolished within this time span (8) for an estimated total number of dwelling units at build-out ranging from 57,016 to 59,248 as shown in Table A-14. TABLE A•14 ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS AND POPULATION AT BUILD•OUT • NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Single Multiple Mobile 50% Densiri ~Ily ~y li4~ Totai No. of units estimated 34,205 21,848 963 57,016 Population 75% De siri iS7,079' n Na. of units estimated 35,256 23,029 963 59,248 Population 163,228 ' Aswminq a 5% vacancy rate and 2.9 persons per household. A-45 DRAFT FOR QISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY It should also be noted that within the City's unincorporated sphere-of- • influence there are approximately 7,396 acres of which 2,044 are designated for residential development. The remaining 5,352 acres have been designated as either open space, utility corridor, or as flood control, Taking into account the City's newly adopted Hillside Development Ordinance, it is estimated that the total number of dwelling units which cou]d be built in the sphere area is 2,948. Table A-15 provides the City's estimate of the number of duelling units to be developed from July 1, 1989 to 1994. Between 9,169 and 11,916 units are anticipated to be developed in this time period resulting in an annual housing production of between 1,834 and 2,383 units. This was based on the existing development which occurred through January 1990, the number of residential units currently in review, as well as future new development estimates based on vacant uncommitted land and growth pro,{ections. Given the current economic climate, a prolectian of future new development over the next five years indicates that growth will not occur at the same rate . as to the previous five year period from 1984-1989. This growth projection has been based on trend analysis, as well as on discussions with local developers, real estate brokers, and market analysts familiar with Rancho Cucamonga. As a result, shown in Table A-15, staff has developed estimates of new development occurring at 50 percent and 75 percent of the previous growth rate as explained bell. The first step in developing a growth projection was to lode at the growth which occurred in the last flue years frog 1984 to 1989. This rss done by calwlatfng the percentage aamunt of land that had developed in each land use category, rhich are as follows: Estate Residential, 0 percent; Hillside Residential, 31.2 percent; Very Lor Residential, 53.9 percent; tar Residential, 87.8 percent; lor~led9u. Residential, 72.4 percent; Mediv Residential, 44.9 percent; Mediia-High Residential, 73.0 percent; and High Residential, 65.9 percent. A-46 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOS€5 9NLY • 61vm the CYrrMt ecma.ic elioete, it-is el ear thst develap~ent in the next five years is not 1lkely to Dear at the sae rate as the previous flue years and, therefore, developaknt hss been esttaxtted as occurring as either 50 or 75 percent of the previous rate. This ras calwlated by taki~ percentages the previous rate for eaM land use utegery to develop the axdifted five year growth rates. For exaaple, the previous five ywr rate for the Hillside Residential district ws 31.2 percent. Taking 50 percent of that is 15.6 percent, and 75 percent of the rate is 23.• percent. These aadified rates were then au1t1p11ed by the gaunt of uncaaitted vacant acreage, as of January 1, 1990, in each land use category to estimate 1drc count of land that would derelap in the next five years. Finally, then, the nuber of units to be developed in the next fire years were estia~ated as scarring at a portion of ach land use density range. Therefore, for each land use category aM for eaM of the possible growth rates, develop~ent ras estiated at occurring at 50 and 75 percent of each land use density range. For exaagle, the Hillside Residential designaLlon has a possible density range of 0.1 to 2 drelltng units per acre. Fifty percent • of this range is .993 drelli~g units per acre vfiile 75 percent of the range is 1.925 duelling units per acre. A-47 DRAFT' FOR Di$OU$Sli'iN PiiRPC,SR>; n~ Y TA9lE A-15 POTENTIAL UNR DEVELOPMENT THROUGH 1984 laud UncomMl4d Ilse dupe ~,ly j(]/yQ ER (J-1) 120.36 HR (.1.2) 118.91 m 11-21 1062.31 L (24) 116.66 LM (ae) 360.50 M (&14) 567.57 MHI11-2/) 93.29 H (21.30) 13.95 DevNOp0ut1 M S07G 01 PRIVIOtIa DIO1d6t M lM S Yeen IacrraY 50%olOMaOy 75%ol Denslly ~NW~9~ 0 0 10 27 201 127 193 «o 703 913 1M7 1014 818 731 .~ 112 3761 4379 DWNpplmlh M 75%01 Ptwloua Units teMinlCletl irem 7/1/89 to tI1I90^ Proposed units eu0enty in review as of 111190'^ Estimated five year projeUion 1909-!994 SO%W9ng11y 74%o1 D01ylly 0 0 27 /1 127 640 •ror 1171 1370 2176 2473 909 1098 5561 8506 1890 1890 1~0 1090 J 9169 9787 10,992 11,918 • O.~wwnea.aFnMarapno.KaO.awpiwRO~^gmWr,nrom,gdtNlww~19e1 ane t9e9. rierlrw on aawauroon.MNO r~o •• E6WnMe0 aom o.penm.M d FYUnp veaM •••Remnq unnon AppYCatiu, tnp A-48 • DRAF-I' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Lards Suitable for Affordable Housinq In addition to the noted vacant residential areas, lands suitable for affordable housing have been lde ntified by the City. Nithin the two planned communities of Terra Vista and Victoria, a commitment was made whereby 15 percent of the total number of units will be made economically available to low and moderate income fam111es. In both developments, the affordable housing units have and will continue to include mixes of attached and detached dwellings. These units have been to be dispersed throughout Lhe planned communities to avoid over-concentrations of low and moderate income families In addition to the planned eommunities, other lands could become available and feasible for the development of affordable housing as shown in Map A-2. The provision of lower cost housing may be achieved as a result of state mandated density bonuses or in canj unction with the City's Senior Housing Overlay District. Affordable unit construction may also be achieved as a result of the City's Redevelopment Agency's 20 percent set aside funds. Discussion of the methods and Drograms to encourage the development of affordable housing, including aid for homeless persons, are contained elsewhere in this cha Dter and in the Element itself and its corresponding five year program, A-49 J Z O w N O a r~ a~ ~z p o N U N ~i` o < _ ~ ~ = ~ ° ~ ~ _ ~ '3 ~ ~ y p S ~ _ < V p V ~ S ~ Z ~' g .. ~ '~ W ~ W " O W ~ ~~ V ~ « ~ N N y ~ t NHS ~ Z W~ F ~ F ; ~ A o d~ ? ~ s '~ _ x spy<.>S >< ~ p ~ ~ ~~ 6~ O ~ < > 3 3 = r F Q U 0 0 ~ ; V p~ Y i G N z W Y J J 2 S s W ~ b ~>~< ~ ~ ® ®® ® ~ ^ aW~Y ~~ a ~€ ti „-~ DRAFT' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY YI. HDUSIM6 AYAIUIBILITY This section provides an overview of the factors contributing to housing availability such as recent and future construction activity, housing prices, and the residential capacity of the two planned communities. The following highlights are included in this section: * Since 1984 there have been a total of 15,566 new dwe111ng units constructed which is an 82 percent increase in the City's housing stock. * The two Planned Communities of Ylctoria and Terra Vista combined provide almost 460 acres of vacant, uncommitted residential land which • will provide a wide range of housing types and densities. * Development incentives Tn the Planned Coamunities nave resulted in the provision of affordable housing units. Approximately 52.7 percent of the total units completed in Terra Yista since 1984 were available to law or moderate income households. \I A-51 DRAFT Recent construction Fi'iiZ Di$(".i.iSSItSN PURPOSES ONLY • Since 1970, the number of Melling units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga has Increased over 560 percent from 5,195 to 34,449 units. As sham 1n figure A-14, two periods of rapid increase have occurred since 1970. The first occurred between 1975 and 1979 when 7,275 units were constructed, while the second has continued free 1984, when the number of new Melting units completed per year Pumped to over 2,000. In the last five years since 1984, there have been a total of 15,566 new Melling units constructed. In the period from 1979 to 1983 the number of new units dropped considerably, reflective of the national econdmtc climate of the time. The favest number of units constructed in any one year was in 1982 when only 247 units were built and the high was in 1986 when 4,347 units were added. As illustrated in Table A-16, which shays the construction activity over the last 11 years (1979-1989), 71 percent (14,181) of the new units were single family Mellings, including single family detached and attached structures (including tawnhames). IAilti-family Mellings or apartments made up the • remaining 29 percent (5,748 units). Based upon the existing vacant residential land remaining in the City, in the taming years a ma,)ority, or 69 percent, of the new housing stock wTtl be of a multi-family nature, which is defined as densities of 8 Melling units to the acre or greater such as condominims, townhames, and apartments. These figures indicate that the City's growth is following a standard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance of single family development occurs early in community development to be followed by multi-faintly type inf111. A-52 • J Z N W O a a ~ z p o .J U _N p O LL N C OIC O _O C U /C~ ~ /~ ` V C ~r ~j v P (d L c ~ U ~ _~ (~ y ~ ~ ~ a c N 7 O L H N N a C .? m m w w c Oi ro rn m m w n rn ~o m T r N Qi ~ L (C ~ } C7 O~ N O rn T O ro rn Ol n rn 0 U W h m m U O A-53 V' M N r O J Z 41 U a Q a y„ Z O N U; U N d' m~ r h n ~~ i ~ m i ~ ui rn O/ C ~ ~p~ ~O/ tea' N ~ b N Ol ~ N ~ ~ ~~ O aAg w N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ IILL `u~~ ~ °_~ ^ v ~ n ^ N ° ~ ~ ~ ° _' ' n N LL ~ ~~ ~ ~~ t0 ~ N Z Q gj ~p r~ o O t p r ON ~ ~ ~ ~ n H W r ^ N ~ Y N z ~ ~a g~ ~ V mp O/ F N~ ~ o ~: N ~ y O ~ ~ ~ ~Lp- N V Q J } LL m ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ N J ~ C H~ ~ LLLL ~ ~ C @ C N o 2e F A-54 • • • DRAFT • Cast lksuciated ~iih housing FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Based upon information compiled by TRN Real Estate Market Information Serviee, the average house price 1n Rancho Cucamonga for 1989 was f170,927. This figure includes new and resale condominium and single family units. For the month of January, 1990, housing sates for new and resale homes in the Ontario, Upland, Chino, and Rancho Cucamonga area showed an average sales price of f211,537 as shown to Table A-17. In this same period the average price by zip code varied from f151,818 Tn the Etlwanda area (91739), to a high of f236,540 for the north Alta Lama area (91701). TABLE A-17 AVERAGE HOME PRICES BY 21P CODE AS OF JANUARY 1990 ZIp_G9fiC Avmrona Pricm 91701 $236,540 91730 $181,097 91739 $151,818 Overall Annual Average Home Price For All Three Zip Codes For 1989" $170,927 ' Includes the sale of new and ezigtirq singledamily homes and condominiums durkrp the ngrah of January 1990. InrJudes the sale of new and existing single-tamBy homes and corWOminiums dudrp Me emire year of 1989. Source: 7RW Real Esime Irdomxitlon Services A-55 J W Q W c ~ o ~ m O ~ F' ~ ~°. °°- ~ DF2AFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY _ Map A-3 shags Lhe average prise par zip code for January of 1990. Prices in the northern Alta Loma area are considerably higher than other areas of the City because of the larger homes and minimum 20,000 square foot lots. In comparison to prices in Rancho Cucamonga, the average sales price fora home in San Bernardino County was 5137,048 far this same time period. According to the Inland fmpire West Board of Realtors, the average cost of resale single family housing in Rancho Cucamonga far 1989 was 5162,675. This is a considerable increase over the average value of non-condominium housing in 1980 which was 589,733 according to the Federal Census Bureau. The price of new and resale homes is expected to continue to increase in the coming years. Although the extent of the increase is hard to fudge as housing pricing, like many other goods, is dependent on economic factors including inflation and interest rates. Other costs associated with home building in Rancho Cucamonga, such as permit fees and land costs, are identified in the governmental and market constraints section of this Technical Appendix. . Short Ten Pro,Sttted Types and Tdwtt of Housing a. Multi-Family: (including condominiums, tawnhanes and apartments) As of December 31, 1989, there were a total of 2,183 multi-family units/lots which had been submitted for review to the Planning Division but which had not yet received any form of approval. A total of 347 multi-family units were approved by the Planning Camaission in 1989. In addition there were 3 multi-family tracts recorded in 1989 fora total of 468 units. b. Single-Family: As of DeceaDer 31, 1989, there were a total of 1,335 new single-family units Lhat had been submitted for project review which had not received approval from the Planning Commission. Additionally, a total of 1,107 new single family units (including new tract subdivision with or withoui design review) had Deen approved by Lhe Planning Commission in 1989. There were 19 new tracts retarded in 1989 for a total of 1,202 units. A-57 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY c. Second units: In accordance with State legislation, in 1983 the City approved an ordinance allowing for second dwelling units to be located on • developed lots in the single family residential districts. The ordinance permits 640 square feet maximum "granny flats" which are temporary/removable structures. In addition, the ordinance permits permanent second Melling units up to 640 square feet in size. To date, two applications for second Melling units have been approved. The first was approved in November, 1985 and the second in June of 1989. A third application has been filed and is pending review. d. Mobile Haines: There are currently 8 mobile hone parks in the Lity with a total of 963 spaces as of January 1, 1989. Mob11e home parks are conditfonally permitted in all residential districts. In addition, individual mobile hares on permanent foundations are currently permitted in all residential districts, except the Very Low Residential Dl strict, sub,iect to Design Review and current development standards. However, new state legislation (SB 2827) approved in 1988 which amended Section 65852.3 of the Government Code, deleted sections of state law which formerly allowed ,jurisdictions to restrict manufactured hones to specific residential districts. In effect, this legislation required ,jurisdictions to allow manufactured housing in all residential districts. As a result, the City will need to review the current provisions of the Development Code applying to mobile hones in order to ensure canpllance with the new legislation. Planned Comities Two large-scaled planned communities, Terra Yista by Lewis Haines, and Victoria by The NTlliam lyon Company, totaling nearly 3,200 acres of land were approved by the City in 1983 and 1981 respectively. Both planned communities provide a mixture of residential, commercial, and public land uses. Residentially planned property in Terra Vista equals approximately 780 acres, while Yictoria has approximately 955 acres of residential property. A-58 • FoR Dls D~F I' CUgS1O1~ QL~RPpcE ~y The distribution of vacant residential- land in the planned e~ by • district is shown on Table A-13. As of December, 1989, both planned communities had a total of 460 acres of vacant uncommitted residential property. Of that total uncommitted acreage, 18.5 percent (85 acres) permits a density range of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre while the remaining 81 percent (375 acres) is in the 8 to 30 dwelling unit per acre density range. As of December, 1989, new project applications within both Planned Communities for 47 units in the 4 to 8 range and 1,722 units in the 8 to 30 density ranges were in the current review process. !t snould be noted that throughout its development since 1981 and as a result of recent amendments, the total number of units proposed for the Yictorla Planned Community has been reduced from 7,577 to 6,271. One significant reason for the reduction is the fact that a larger amount of lower density, single family product has been developed than originally planned, and conversely that the number of higher density, multi-family units has been reduced. However, a significant portico of those single faarlly units were considered very affordable at the time that they aerc developed and provided a significant portion of first time hoar purcfiases for the area. Both Terra Vista and Victoria have incentives to provide 15 percent affordable housing for low and moderate income households. A low income family is defined as one whose income 1s held 80 percent of the area median family income, whereas a moderate incase family is from 80 percent to 120 percent of the area median income. It was Intended that these units be dl5burse6 throughout the various neighborhoods within the Dlanned cammunlttes. for each unit provided by the developers which is affordable to 1d and moderate intone households, the City shall grant a bonus of one additional unit, up to 15 percent of the maximum density permitted in the planned communities, if requested. In Terra Vista this incentive could provide up to 1,200 affordable units and in Victoria 941 affordable units at build-out. A-59 D rtAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY A stugy conducted of the affordable housing unit production in Terra Vista, by City staff 1n October of 1986 with a second study conducted by the Lewis • Development Company in 1990, found that 52.7% of the totai units completed since 1984 have been available to lax or moderate income households, as shown in Tabie A-18. While there has been periodic monitoring of affordable housing in Terra Ytsta, there has been no comparable monitoring of Victoria. Based on verbal information from The Lyon Company and knaxledge of previous selling prices, it is very likely that a fair proportion of the homes sold in the first years of Yi ctorta's development were affordable. However, the exact number and distribution of affordable units provided 1n the Victoria Pla~med Cosaunity are unknown. Therefore, in order to determine the amount, 1t will be necessary for the City to develop a review and monitoring program. As part of this program, previous sales of units Tn Victoria will be reviewed to determine the number conveyed to law and moderate income households. In addition, periodic monitoring of newly deveioped units should occur in order to ensure that at least 15 percent of the total housing units will be affordable to low and moderate income households. • A-60 • \I J Z {!1 N O a °' ~ z 00 N 7 U N O o! ~i ~ - _ N Ono r N N tm0 ~ n _ m ~ N r ~ D H H z o ~ ~ pp o _ ~ r N ~~pp l7 N ~ g m a a x 0 s LL a ~~ee 8 ~ m ~ F $ ~3 N ~ ~ °' R W~ ~ N O N O = V O1 ~ LL O= a R co aa~ . o ! y m ~ ~ 7 ~ s ~ s A-61 aRar~- Condm~iniu• Conversions FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • The City adopted a Condaainium Conversion Ordinance in 1980 which limits the number of multi-family rental units converted to ownership type. The intent of the ordinance is to: (a) Encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing in the community and a variety of choices of tenure, type, price, and location of housing. (b) Maintain and encourage a supply of affordable housing, both ownership and rental, for low and moderate incase persons and families; and (c) Pramate the residential stability and quality of the community by developing neighborhood identity, discouraging dl5ptacement of residents, and facilitating ownership opportunities for the camanity. The maximum number of units converted in one year is based upon the number of • new apar4nents added to the housing stock in thr previous year. The ordinance also provides for legal notification of tenants of the owner's intent to convert, tenant right of first refusal to Wrchase a unit, and establishes requirements for physical upgrades of the sub,~ect property to assure canp7tance with current City standards. To date, one pro,~ect, totaling 328 units, was approved in 1989 for conversion from apartments to condominiums. However, the owner does not Intend to sell the units tamedlately, but continue to rent them. ThTS particular project was originally designed to condominium standards and therefore did not rewire any physical changes to the project. A-62 • DRAFT' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - Fair Housing To promote fair housing, the City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the Inland Mediation Board. The Board is a non-profit organization which helps citizens (both tenants and landlords) resolve housing disputes without the need for costly and time-consuming court action. The Board trains conmuni ty volunteers in the art of negotiating, who in turn conduct mediation sessions between parties. The Board also provides mortgage default counseling, and assists with complaints regarding housing discrimination and refers cases to the District office of the Department of Fair Employment and Nousing, and conducts housing workshops to iniuGw tic _...!,,,i*y of tenant/landlord rights and responsibilities under State and Federal laws with respect to fair housing. Frain July, 1984 to June, 1989, Inland Mediation Board handled 1,296 inquiries from Rancho Cucamonga. Since Juiy of 1987, 54 of those tatting were further counseled and 15 coaplaints of discrimination were filed. In the last four • years, the number of cases has increased by an average of 17.8 percent a year. It is likely that the number of inquiries will Continue to increase over the next five years, in conjunction with the increase in population. Senior Sfiared Nousing This program has been in effect for three years and is aimed at tower income senior citizens. The obJective is Lo provide counseling and referral services to assist seniors in managing their homes and remaining independent. Inland Mediation counsels seniors on their options and matches people who want to share their home. However, so far, Inland Mediation has found the options counseling to he more valuable than the actual matches. from July of 1985 to June of 1989, a total of 77 seniors were counseled and 4 persons assisted with a match. The City plans to continue this program and will encourage Inland Mediation to further promote its availability in hopes of reaching an increased number of seniors. A-63 QRAFT Oensity Bonuses FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • As the need for lower income housing has became an increasing concern in California, the State legislature has required local governments to offer the private sector incentives for the developmen4 of affordable housing. Recent amendments to State taw (Section 65915 of the Government Code), as a result of AB 1259, have strengthened the requirements for provision of these incentives. The revised legislation requires that incentives be provided if: 20 percent of the units are reserved for lower income; if 30 percent of the units are reserved for very low income; or if 50 percent are reserved for senior citizens. The law no longer allows credit for provision of units for moderate income. The basic provisions require that cities grant a 25 percent density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowed density and at least one other Incentive; or, instead of the density bonus, provide other incentives of equivalent financial value. In exchange, the units shall be maintained at the affordable levels fora specified length of time (10 years if a city does not grant one additional incentive, 30 years or longer if full incentives are granted). In 1989, the City removed from the Nousing Element a provision to limit the density bonus to 25 percent. • Prior to the new legislation, the City prescribed the conditions of the incentives through the use of development agreements which were specific to the project's needs and characteristics. However, new State law requt res iocai jurisdictions to adopt an implementing ordinance to specify the method of providing developer incentives. As a result, the City has added the development of a density bonus ordinance to its 1990-91 work program schedule. Mortgage Revenue Band Promrams This program which is intended to provide financing opportunities to either encourage developers of multi-family rental housing to offer at least 20 percent of their units to lower income households or to assist first time low and moderate income buyers by offering below rate mortgages. A-64 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES 9NLY • A. Single-Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds By cooperation agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, the San Bernardino County Economic and Cammuntty Development Department sells mortgage bonds to provide below market rate 30 year fixed mortgage financing for first time home buyers whose intone does not exceed 80 percent of the area median income. Additionally, there are restrictions on the initial sale price of the homes financed under the program. In recent years, the cost of new housing being built in Rancho Cucamonga has exceeded the price limits of the programs, although resale homes are also eligible. As a result, to 1989 the program assisted 3 homes, of which the average household income was (40,644 and the average purchase price was f107,657. B. Multiple-Family Rental Mortgage Revenue Bond Progra Also by cooperation with the County of San Bernardino, rental pro,~ects in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to lower income households, earning less than 90 percent of the area median income, may be funded with county multiple-family rental revenue bonds. According to the County, approximately 355 units have been funded through this program since 1983. Use of these funds is then subject only to market conditions and the developer's ability to develop and rent the units. Redevelop~ent Agency A. 20 Percent Set Aside Funds Prior to 1989, the City's Redevelap~ent Agency did not have a consolidated housing strategy for use of its 20 percent set aside funds. The agney was prieisrily funneled into capital iaprovsent projects which could then provide benefit to future developers of sulti-fa~ily housing. The Agency had also provided direct incentives Lo one affordable hausim~ pr4lect, the Heritage Park Apardents for Seniors, by contributing approzia~ately f80,000 tdards the cost of off-site iagrove~mts. However, such uses of the 20 percent set aside A-65 bRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY funds are no longer allowed as a rewlt of a taw suit filed against the Ctty by the Yestern Center for Law and Poverty. In 1989, the City reached agresent rtth the Mestern Center for Lac and Poverty on the uses of the City's Redevelapnent Agency affordable housing fund. The agresent proscribes haw fund revenues rill be used to proWde affordable housing by establishing four intone levels eligible for housing assistance frog the fund: Level I Fanies earning less than 35 percent of the area nedian incase, adjusted for faotly s1 tt, Level II Failies earning between 36 and 45 percent of the area ssdian incase, aQiusted for fanny size, Level III FanSlies earning be4reen 16 and 60 percent of the area nedian incase, adiusted for fanny sift, Level Iv Fannies earning between 6I and 90 percent of the area awdian • incose, adJusted for fanny stn. As a result, the City is in the process of developing an Affordable Haustng Strategy t0 carry out the provisions of the Agresent. As part of the developwent of the Strategy, the City hired a canwltant teams whose awabers included OaWd Paul Rosen and Associates, the housing and tez law firms of Goldfarb and Lipaan, and the real estate ecananics canwlting fire of M1111aas-KUebelheck and Associates, Inc. In addition, a Citizens Housing Tast Force was forted, chose swaaers included representatives fro) the RsnMo Cucanortga Chaatber of Ca•erce, st0.lor lenders, far-profit developers, neighborhood leaders, senior citizens, and stobile hope park residents. A-66 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • la Aater the njeaey pas prev#AeA eireei #neent#ves to one afferAab#e parsing pre3ec6r the ker#q~e Park Apartments fer Seniors. the A9ensy emir#brteA appren#mate#y i2Gr000 tewarAS the east of off-site improvements far the pre3eet. Sreq roes of the 2g pereent set-as#Ae frnAs are ne #enger a##eweA. As a resr#t* a number of new programs are errrent#y being eaam#ned fer rse of tqe frnds by tpe Agency ihrergp Aeve#epment of an Afferdab#e Mers#nq Strategy. UnAer the terms of the Western banter Sett#ement Agreementr these frnds may be rseA en#y fer A#rest benef#t Le hers#n9 rents afferAab#e to persensffam#?nos of iew er moderate ineeme, iqe A9reemen6 ansa defines the dnvnsnen of rents beA+een speenf#e nneeme eaterernes. Although no specific programs have been approved to date, a number are being examined ns part of the Affordable Housing Strategy wh#eh #s errrently rnAer development. chase and include the folioring: - Creation of a local non-profit Housing Development Corporation which would became an affordable housing developer 1n the caemunity. . - Creation of non-profit Neighborhood Cooperatives to purchase existing homes, rehabilitate them and rent them to qualifying families. - Creation of Mobile Name Park Cooperative to purchase existing mobile home parks in order to stabilize rents and allow control of the parks by its residents. - Land Banking: The Agency has recently approved a "land banking" policy which allows the purchase of vacant property suitable for development of affordable housing. This land is then held by the Agency until an appropriate development protect is obtained for it. - Pursuing the acquisition of tax syndication as an additional source of funding for affordable housing development. A-67 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY As a result, program shall be added. to the Housing Element ~to require the derelap~ent and impleasmtation of the Redevelopment Affordable Housing Strategy and to require that once the Strategy is completed, that the el sent De rcWsed as necessary to ensure conslstenty with the affordable housing program. B. ibrtgage Revenue Bond Program The Redevelopment Agency and the City have issued over E150 mi111on in Mortgage Revenue Bonds since 1983. The program provides below-market lntere~t races ror rust-time home buyers whose income does not exceed 120 percent of the area median incase. Additionally, there are restrictions on the initial sale price of the homes financed under the program. Approximately 760 Hanes have been financed under these programs. The feasibility of further mortgage band programs is 6rlven by the housing market. In recent years, the price of the housing product in the City Aas exceeded the price limits of the programs which is set by NUD an an amiwl basis. Navever, should the housing development industry express a need for this type of program, future issues could be sold. • Mobile Hole Park Rental Aarcsents By mutual agreement between the City and owners of the 8 existing mobile have parks, a Mobile Hane Park Accord was approved on January 1, 1985. The purpose of the Accord is to protect the residents of mobile homes from unreasonable space rent increases, while at the same tine recognizing the need for mobile hone park owners to receive a ,lust and reasonable intone to cover the costs of repairs, maintenance, insurance, employee Services, additional amenities, and other operations, as well as a fair return an their investment. Ta date, the Accord has fulfilled its purpose by stabilizing rents and generally Improving relations beMeen residents and owners in the City. A-b8 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY FY9Vi5 tans of the Accord require that the park owners shall meet a minimum of once a year with the resiaents corgi*_tee of the park and shall also meet prior to affecting any alterations in service ar changes to rules. Ir, the event of a breach of contract or non-compliance with the agreement by the owner, the City shall act as an enforcement authority. Under terms of Lhe accord, an owner may increase rents ante a year ar as based upon specific factors such as change in utflity fees, assessments or in the event of a capital project, one which exceeds a cost of ;10,000, is made within a park. Therefore, as tong aS the accord f::^^~+~ms smoothly, and provided that an owner is not in breach of the agreement, the City wilt not ena~1 :r„ Poem of regulation that imposes restrictions or controls an omer's ability to increase ar decrease mobile home space rents. A-69 DRAFT YIi. HOD31N6 ASSISTNICE NEEDS ri7R.I3iSOUS$ION PURPOSES ONLY • This portion of the technical appendix refers to the estimated existing and protected households that need same form of housing assistance. Two major sources have been used to complete this section; the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared by SLAG and the Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) prepared by the City for the Caamunity Development Black Grant (COBG) Program. The following are the highlights associated with this section. * The Regional Housing Needs Assessment snows the current laver Tnargw households who are paying disproportionately high percentages of their income on housing costs. * According to the SCAG/RHNA, approxtmately ir4}4 5,414, or 13 percent of the totai housing units constructed by 1994 should be affordable to, households earning 120 percent or less of the established median incase, * By meeting the goals of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) • and the Housing Assistance Plan (NAP), the City w711 also be providing assistance to various minority and special need households. A-70 • DRAFT F+3R n)SCS.iSSIZ'iii PURPOSES ONLY • Regional Housing Needs Asses~ent State law requires the Southern California Association of Governments to complete a detailed housing needs assessment which is used to assign responsibilities to Jurisdictions td help meet the percentage of the regions low income housing needs for a five year period. The most recent Regional Housing Heeds Assessment (RNNA) update was completed in December of 1988. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment identified both existing Housing needs fora Jurisdiction as well as its protected five year Housing need. Existing need is defined by SLAG as, "the number of lower income households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing." Nhereas, future need is defined as, "the number of units that would have to be added in each Jurisdiction to accommodate the forecasted growth in the number df households by July 1, 1994, as well as the number of units that would have to be added to compensate for anticipated demolitions and changes to achieve an "id¢al vacancy rate." The future need is then further broken down into four income categories as defined by State Law. The four categories are very law (less than 50 percent of the . median), low (50 to 60 percent of the median), middle (80 to 120 percent of the median) and upper (more than 120 percent of the median). The Regional Housing Needs Assessment estimated that Rancho Cucamonga currently has 3,069 existing very low and low income households Currently in need of assistance. Of those, 1,723 are owner households and 1,346 are rental households, as shown in Table A-19. the future housing need identified by SCAG indicates that an additional 9,446 9,568 households Mtil be needed Tn the City by 1994. Of this total number of households, 2ri46 2,375 are estimated to be very iow and law income and },767 1,729 are estimated to be moderate income. Due to the high cost of housing in the City, it is assumed that all future very low and lox income households will be in need of assistance. Therefore, the total number of lower income households overpaying for shelter as of 1994 including existing (3,069) and future need F2ia4i~ (2,375) is estimated to be 6,41.4 5,444. A-71 [~~~ 7ABlE A-19 FOR~DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • CURRENT AND FUTURE HOUSEHOLDS NEEDING ASSISTANCE PART I -1988 EXISTING NEED• 1988 Housing Units 31,665 1988 Households 29,844 1988 Un00cupied units 1,821 Low Income Burdened Households j~(,y(¢ Very Low Income Low Income ~O,Bd,I~Ig BYDI9!)~S 5,897 3,069/52.2 1,380 1,669 @urdened Owners 1,723 VLIOwners 736 LlOwners 988 Burdened Ramers 1,346 VLI Renters 843 LI ReMers 703 PART 11-FUTURE NEED THROUGH 1994 VB[y Low Income law Income Hiah Ina 1,117 1,258 1,729 5,463 PART III -EXISTING AND fIITURE NEED 13u8 7,390 1,689 3,069 1S94" 1.717 j,~$ 2.375 2,497 2,947 5,444 ' Soun:a: TM RsNSad Ragbnal Ibulinp NNdt ASaaaStrwa d l>ramDar 1988 °'Afsumpion that aM rNw Vary low and Lower (1tNnN 1quNMWa wiM 17a hunlened A-72 • r 1 L~ DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES QNLY. Table A-[-4 ill~!strates, asing t~iE median_incame of 532,200 for the Riverside- San Bernardino MSA as of April, 1989, what the various income ranges would be for the region. This is compared to the income ranges for Rancho Cucamonga, which are based on an estimated median income of 144,726. 7woie w-av INCOME RANGES FOR RIVERSIDE • SAN BERNARDINO MSA ANO RANCHO CUCAMONGA Vary low Lo.r Ilotlara6a 11FPar O d0% a Wa~.n ff4l0% 4L-hap !4100% OWr 11076 41JM:lW1 41JimdYR Rh.-San Bam A73A• o-ie,ioo 16,100-25,780 25.76038,&0 39.84oa Rancho cucmmon0•" 022,363 22,38335.787 35,761.53,671 53.871 + eu.e~MU.s.oeq.dwu.wgaroo.rd~nd..an~nmm.m~.assx.xao~or.anrydroanMPow,ra-sr~e.mwoaw as of Ap11909. •. Basea on sn esa~wlEa 1909 mNn nmmr d jM,728; calpallW M NYfnra(wl~.beck d AOSOdaMt, hc. h M 0n6 wnauwi. /bti9 Svde9y A-73 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ii is the overall identified need, of low and very tow 4ncunw: haaeholds LhaL • the majority Of the Housing El anent programs are targeted for 1n the provision of direct monetary assistance, rehabilitation programs, or the encouragement of affordable priced housing. During the period of 1980 to the present, the City has made a good faith effort to meat the current and future needs of law and moderate income households. In 1983 alone, two multiple-family developments were completed which utiliaed HUD Section 8 rental subsidization. These Lwo developments contain a total of 317 units out of which 157 have been made available under the Section 8 program, The approval and aevelopmenc or these iwv yr~j a.i.a were directly related to the housing programs prepared in 1980. Since 1984, three senior housing apartment projects have been approved of which two have been constructed. In the first project a total of 232 units, of which 70 percent, or 163 units, are reserved for senior eitizens earning less than 80 percent of the San Bernardino median Income. The second project was developed with a total of 168 units, of which 100 percent are to be available to senior citizens earning less than 80 percent of the County of San Bernardino median • income. A third project of 170 units, which has been approved but not as yet constructed, was originally required to have 50 percent or 85 units available to low and moderate income households. However, in July 1990, the property was acquired by the Redevelopment Agency with their 20 percent set aside funds and as a result, up to 100 percent of the units could be made available to laver income households. There have been additional projects which have been assisted through various means and are further addressed to the Sections below. A-74 • DRAFT Housing Assistance Pian FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES CJN1-Y • The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared as part of Tts Community Development Block Grant Program (COBG) a Housing Assistance Plan (HAP). The HAP identifies the housing needs of various special groups (elderly, small family, and large family), minority groups, and also identifies the breakdowns between owner/renter households and lower income households versus all households needing assistance, In addition, the HAP shows the goals which the Ctty is to undertake in the CDBG program to areas sucn as reiw~iY2Lti;.-. of _~~"et+^w+rw units. new construction of affordable rental units, and rental subsidies for the various special needs groups. The HAP, as of April, 1989, identifies a total of 1,946 lower income households needing rental subsiQy assistance. This can be broken dawn by identifying 174 elderly lower income households (8.9 percent), 1,419 small family lower incase households (72.9 percent), and 353 large family lower income households (18.1 percent) needing rental subsidies. Clearly, rental assistance is a au~or area of focus which the Lity needs to pursue. • The HAP is divided into three year and one year goals which identify numerical actions to help reduce these special groups needing assistance. By September, 1991, it is the City's goal to have facilitated rental assistance to 20 elderly households, 130 small families and 25 large families. In terms of the number of rental units to be assisted, it is the City's goal to have provided funding for the rehabilitation of five units with the hope that the new rental rehabilitation program operated by the County of San Bernardino will be utilized. It is a goal that 200 new units will be assisted through use of the existing Mortgage Revenue Bond Program of which 20 percent (40 units) will serve taw or moderate income households. Progrmas to address the needs of lacer and moderate income Aauseholds have been included under Ob3ective Statement 5, Conti/ned in CAiapter 2 of the element. A-75 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Other factors which this NPA identifies are the efforts in providing ownership assistance for acqul5itton and general home improvements. Through 1991 it Ts • the City's intent, through Mortgage Rerenue Bond Program, to provide low interest mortgage loans for first time home huyers for approximately 200 households. It is also the City's intent to assist 18 lower income households with hone improvement assistance and 75 senior households artd disabled or handicapped with emergency repair grants. By meeting these above noted goals, the City will be assisting the various special and minority household groups in the City. Further discussion an these needs is provided in a later portion of this section. The total nunber of households in the HPA showing a current need for rental subsidy assistance (1,946) does not differ greatly from the number identified by SCAG (1,346 households). The 600 household difference might be attributed to the difference in dates when the too studies were conducted. In formulating the housing programs, the City will De examining both the HAP and the SLAG-RNNA forecasts. in this w+yr the pryrams eaa be dereleped sash ihai the mesa needed 9rawps son be assisted proper-y+ As a result, a rmm~ber of • prograat have been added Lo assist those in need of rental assistance. These prograsms are contained in Chapter 2, Objective 5, Policy A, and include wM items as continuation of Ume Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bmd Progra, providing inforraatian and encouraging the use of Secttan 8 programmms, continuing the use of the Mobile Hare Par# Accord, as well as the development of new housing opportunities through the use of the Redevelapmrnt Agency's 20 percent set aside furmd. Ca~mrnity Developmermt Block Grant Program The vast maJority of Lhe City's Mousing stock is sand; however, there are deteriorated units in older parts of Rancho Cucamonga which require immediate attention. Nith same improvement efforts these units can continue to serve the housing needs of the City. A-76 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • The Community Bevelopment Block Grant program developed by the City is designed to: (a) focus efforts within the designated target areas; (b) upgrade the existing housing stock; and (c) improve inadequate and substandard public improvements. The intent of this approach is to eliminate the causes and prevent the spread of blight and deterioration, and to support the investment of public and private funds and rehabilitation. The specific program obiectives developed for the 1988-89 year have been designed to meet the comnuntty needs and achieve the following: (a) upgrade and maintenance of the existing housing stock; (b) preservation of the City's historic resources; (c) elimination of discrimination in the sale and rental of housing; (d) provision of counseling and referral services Lo senior citizens; (e) improvement of inadequate and substandard public facilities; and (f) the provision of recreational facilities that are accessible to law and moderate income persons. Currently, there are five targeted areas in the City for the home improvement . program as shown on Map A-4. The Housing Improvement Program Ts Citywide and is based on individual income levels. Below market rate interest loans are available for maSor repairs and emergency repair grants are available to Senior Citizens and handicapped or disabled home owners. In addition, in order to ensure fair housing practices, the City contracts with Inland Mediation to provide counseling and to assist in finding senior roommate riatches. The City also will continue to fund the construction of public improvements in the Southwest Cucamonga Target area. Finally, a new program object{ ve will involve the development of a loan and/or grant program to assist owners of historic properties to undertake maintenance and restoration. A-71 W °z y > zz ..1 a a ~ ~ Z O C ) ~ C • N N ~ U_O ~f' _° m`"~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~C~ a g ~ ~ V1. gOmM oomm~ t-r-~ - ~ ~a G a r------ r < w a a r r=;< s ~ ~ ~ d' Z i ~ ~ , eWWQ 22Vfp{i ~ ~ Q O '~'--y ~ 3V2Q ~c~main ~ U~ N i ~ M ° a J { ~' U ~ N ~ -'«~ N ~ U. ~'1 r. 1 ~ N ~.....i ~ O '. O r N ~ N N M p ~ w,.,, i -~waa{{ _ A .. ~ VM91VV+y { wy e $ ~ e { ~ r' ~ y ' ..e C ~ A ~ y ~ IIwwO Q ~ ~ 1 ~ I_ 4i N , 11 pp I.. r ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ~ • N S . ~ ..,,s DRAFT • special Needs Populations FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY By meeting the goals of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and the NAP the City will also be providing asststance to the various minority and special needs households. The following is a discussion of the various special populations in the City in need of asststance: A. Minority Households: Estimates of the total number of lover income minority hfw~cohniwe ro,..,a.,,, less than 80 percent of the County median income) are provided in Tables A-21 and A-22. This tnforma4lon, provided by the 1989 HAP, estimates that there are approximately 119 lower income minority households living in substandard housing 1n Rancho Cucamonga, and that there are 358 loxer income minority households in need of rental assistance. In many cases, discriminatory practices based on race, religion, color, or • sex presents barriers to equal housing opportunities for minorities. As a result, it is important for the City to encourage fair housing practices through support of Inland Mediation. A-79 DRAFT TABLE A-21 FOR DISCUSSION hURPOSES ONLY • MINORITY LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN SUBSTANDARD HOUSING EthOIGItX Q11tnf[ H1!]tft Black 12 2 Spanish Origin 74 14 Native American 4 1 Asian nr Pacfic InlanAwr in ~ Total 100 19 sourcr. Mw +9e>t FlnV SWUrrrr d camunlly Jq~dlws for as loss-eo camwry wwwaMd aba aranl pmpr~m. TABLE A-22 • MINORITY LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING RENTAL ASSISTANCE ) 9rm11 Famliv Lama Family Black 2 16 4 Spanish Ohgin 21 221 55 Native American 1 15 4 Asian or Pacific Islander 1 14 4 Total 25 266 67 Sours: AyrY 11M8 Flnfl SWMrnI d con.r^nry al,l.aw..7or1M 1>M9-so cdmuNtr o.wwwnsn Block oranl program. A-SO • nRa,F-r ffi. The Disabled: FOR BISCUg$lON I3URP0$ES ONLY Fran a housing perspective, there are three different types of disabled persons, with varying housing needs: the developmentally disabled; the physically disabled; and the mentally disabled. Table A-23 provides a tabulation of the number of physically and developmentally disabled persons in the City which is further summarized below. Available data from the HAP estimated approx 2,656 disabled household as of 1988. The State Departaent of Development Services indicate that there are approximately 210 developmentally disabled persons in the City of Rancho Coca ~aya.ryry,uwimaieiy one-hair or these individuals are adults (104), 35 percent are children aged 4 to 18 (75), with the remaining 15 percent under 3 years of age. Based on informetior, from the iota) Serial Security office, there are approximately 900 physically disabled adults 1n Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, the local school districts indicate that there are approximately 426 children, aged 6 to 18, with physical disabilities. A maiortty of • these children (404) have speech impairments. There are no nu~ers available to determine the number of mentally disabled living in the City. Typically, it is architectural barriers in housing which pose a common problem to disabled people. Other housing needs of these persons may involve institu*.tonal care facilities, t~ensitianal living facilities as well as low cost housing. Low cost housing mqy become particularly important when an in diridual no longer requires institutional or group support, or is subsisting only on social security income. A-81 ~R,aFr FOR tllSCist6St0!v PURPOSES Of~iLY TABLE A-23 DISTRIBUTION OF DISABLED POPULATION • DECEMBER, 1989 DEVELOPMENYALLY DISABLED' Number of Oto3 31 4 to 12 58 13 to 18 17 i o ~„ n.,e. 1 ~. Total 210 PHYSICALLY DISABLED Numl»n of Apra GroudDtsablllty ~~DB 6to8" Speech Impaired 404 Hard of Hearing 3 Visualty Impaired 2 ORhopedic 3 Other 14 Total, Ages 6 to 18 426 18 & Over"' 400 Total 1,326 ' From Stato DapanmeM of DevebpmeMal Servbea " From West End Special Educalbn Local Man Aron ••' Approximate nunWer of aduas receivlnp aocW seamy benetks for plrysical dleabilay Source: Droll AHordabb Fbuairq Slnnegy, YVialerrp•Kua6aNteclc 8 Aseodatea A-82 0 DRAFT • C. 52nior Citisdns: Fps ~1SCUSSION Fi.ii2PC3SE5 Oi~LY Nationally, the American population is growing older. In the City, Tt is estimated that there are 2,297 elderly-headed households, assuming the same proportion of the population as in 1980. However, the proportion of Rancho Cucamonga's population which is 65 years or older is expected to have increased above the 7.7 percent cited in the 1980 Census. Living on fixed incomes and the ever increasing cost of living will pose a serious problem to many of these seniors. Not only will the provision of affordable housing be a problem, but even those who awn their own hnaae ,nay Tina ii ving costs so high that hone maintenance needs are neglected. Assistance to these seniors to help find alternative financing means, lax interest loans for grants or shared situations should be continued through Inland Mediation-The Senior Share Program. D. Large Famrtlies: • Large families are comprised of families of 5 or more persons. These families represent a housing concern due to Doth the difficulty of finding adequate sized housing units and the resulting high costs associated with these larger units. Thus Large families suffer disproportionately from over-crowding and inability to pay. In 1980 there were approximately 2,723 large families representing 16 percent of the City's Households. Of these, 84 were renter occupied units. The small number of rental units is likely due to the lack of availability of appropriate sized units. In developing an estimate for 1989, the number of large families in the population is assumed to be in the tame proportion as in 1980. A5 a result, it is estimated that there are approximately 4,709 large families. A-83 9RAFT E. Single Heads of Households: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • According to the 1980 census, there were a total of 3,711 single heads of households in Rancho Cucamonga, of which 2,233, or 60 percent, were female headed and represented 13.2 percent of all households in the City. AS shown in Table A-24, the total number of female headed households in need of assistance (paying more than 30 percent of their gross monthly income for housing) totaled 997 (or 44.6 percent of all female householders), of which 576 (57.7 percent) were mortgage holders and 421 (42.3 percent) were renters. Estimates from the 1980 census indicate that there were 1,055 single parent households of which 823, or 78 percent, were female headed. Of these, 280 were lower income households (earning less than 80 percent of the area median income) and 101 were in need of rental asststance. The City's HAP estimates that as of 1988 there were 627 lacer Tncame single parent households of which 538, or 85.8 percent, were female • headed. Of these, it is estimated that there were 243 single parent househoids in need of rental assistance of which 195 were female headed. This data indicates that a disproportionate nu~er of the households in the City are headed by single women living belw the poverty level and who are paying more than 30 percent of Lheir gross monthly income for housing. Additionally, the ma,~orlty of the single parent households in the City in 1980 were also female headed (78 percent) and this proportion has probably remained the same or increased since that time. As a result, a large proportion of single heads of households, particularly those who are single Darents with dependent children need housing which is affordable and located close to services such as day care, parks, schools, and recreation facilities. a-sa e DRAFT 9'ABL~A-24 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSg~ ~pp ~HE P SINGLE HEAD OF HOUS EHOLD BV AYIN AGE AND SEX G THAN 30°k OF GROSS INCOME ON HOUSING -1980 FEMALE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD Owner % of Income 15.24 254 X44 45$4 fi>S.t 30-34% 0 36 17 20 0 35%+ 0 177 154 84 88 Total 0 2t ~ "'. t 04 88 Reiner 30-34°/, 22 35 7 21 6 35-49% 32 40 11 7 18 50+ 70 87 27 11 27 Total 124 162 45 39 51 MALE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD Owner 30-34'Y° 7 44 20 7 6 35%+ 34 61 59 14 11 Total 41 105 79 21 17 Renter 30-34N° 22 12 14 7 0 35-49% 2fi 14 6 14 0 50%+ 42 7 26 10 0 Total 90 33 46 31 0 \J Source: 1980 fe0eral Census A-85 DRAFT F, Homeless: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Based on a survey of local taw and code enforcement agencies, social service offices as well as local churches and informed citizenry conducted in January, 1990, the Planning Division has determined that there are approximately 25 persons or less on an average daily basis to need of shelter. The aia,lority of these persons are men between the ages of 18 and 60 and are primarily illegal aliens and/or substance abusers. The second identifiable group of persons in need of shelter is comprised of women with young children. This group accounts for less than 5 percent of the c.eral7 Lui.ai. ine only form of shelter assistance for the hamN ess in the L1ty currently available is provided by local churches or charitable organizations in the form of motel vouchers or by parishioners who take these people into their homes. There are currently two motels in the City which have been used for emergency housing, the New Kansan and Motel 66. IL is also possible that motel facilities in nearby camwnities are utilized as well. The City's Development Code currently does not include designations which specifically allow the development of shelter facilities, although it is possible that existing definitions in the Code for Group Care Facilities and Residential Care Facilities may be interpreted for this use. As a result, the City should evaluate existing Code definitions and requirements to determine those conditions and standards where types of shelter facilities can be located, including review and evaluation of industrial districts. Housing Element Law (Section 65583(a)f6)) requires the analysis of the special housing needs of persons and families in need of emergency shelter and the identification of adequate sites to facilitate the development of emergency shelters and transitional housing. To this end, the City may follow one or more courses of action discussed below: a-a6 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY i. AS the majority of the assistance of homeless in the City is • currently provided by total churches and/or organizations in the form of motel vouchers, the City should continue to monitor the number of homeless and provide assistance to these groups if requested. Vouchers would be used in any local motel sites in the City or in adjacent communities; and 2. The City could use either COBG or Redevelopment Agency 20 percent set-aside funds, cr a combination of the ao, to develop a transitional housing program. At a minimum, this program should involve direct subsidies in the form of grants and/or loans to be used toward housing entry costs, i.e., first and last months rent and security deposit. M expanded program could be explored which would involve the provision of longer term shelter in combination with job training and money management; and 3. The City should evaluate existing code requirement; to determine those conditions and standards where various types of shelter • facilities can be totaled, including review and evaluation of industrial districts. 4. Finally, the City should offer to participate with adjacent communities toward the provision of a subregional shelter service. This is particularly important as the homeless prohlem does not just follow jurisdictional boundaries, but rather, is a larger regional problem. Therefore, in order to address the problem in a comprehensive manner, the City should encourage the development of a more subregional approach. 6. Fart•vor#ers: The special needs of .any farrorters sts from their la wages and insecure nature of their eaployment. In 1980, the CCnSUS identified 138 persons in the farming, forestry, and fishlrg occupations which represented .25 percent of the City's population. A-87 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY In an attegt to utt~ate the current farrater population of the City, • stiff has contacted several State, Comfy, and local agmNes and found that this type of speNflc iMar~atian is generally unavailable. Haever, the lout State Baplgyrat Develop~mt Deparuent indluted that the need for farrorkers 1n the City of Ranclw Cucaaxmga has dropped drastiully in recent years. Evidence for this stateaamt un be clearly sham u ffie Wority of lud in the City origlnalty devoted to citrus and vineyard production has given ray to nw develapaart in the last ten years. As a result, heusing opportunities for those rho cartinue to be involved in this type of rat can be enhanced by expanding the C1ty's affordable housing stock through the Dro9r~ identified in Chapter 2 of the Nausing Et eav!nt. • R-88 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • H~. Existing Affordable ProSects with the Potential to Convert to 14rket Rate Rents: As the result of recent legislation (SB 1282) cities are required to provide an inventory and analysts of existing assisted housing developments that are eligible to change to non-law income housing uses during the next 10 years, which is to be included to the City's Housing Element by January 1, 1992. The term "assisted housing developments" includes all multi-family rental housing that receives assistance from a broad range of programs including federal programs, state and local multi- family revenue bond programs, or local in-lieu fees. The bill also requires the above referenced analysis and inventory to include a cost estimate for producing new replacement housing, an identification of groups that could possibly acquire and manage the units as well as an assessment of possible State and Federal funds that could be used to preserve the assisted housing developments. • As a result of the requirements outlined above, the City shall provide an additional update to the Housing Element before January 1, 1992. Table A- 25 is a list of those pra3ects which have received multi-family mortgage revenue bond financing. In addition, pro,{ects which have received other forms of local assistance are also shown, with the type of financing a term of affordability identified. 7n addition, Table A-26 provides a summary analysts of the City's identified housing need, including special needs populations. A-89 D RA FT p~ ~jg l~~I p Q ASS STEQ MULTI-FAMIL~ RENTAL H{~if5 !~ts Y~l1~ES QN~Y MULTI-FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROJECTS • Approval Data/ PtgjRct Location Unlis Tsrm g~pgBj g~ income R~,qulraments 4112/83 Parkview Place Apts 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy. 30 of 152 10 Years 80% of Median 4/12/83 Mt. View Apts. 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy. 54 01270 10 Years 80'/0 of Median 3/13/84 Pepperwood Apts. 9055 Foothill 81vd. 46 of 230 10 Years 80% of Median i i i i ace nernage ran< senior Apts 96^1 Lomita Ct. 45 of 233 10 years 80% of Median 9/27/65 Alta Park Apts. 10400 Arrow Rt. 75 01396 10 Years 80% of Median 8/28/85 Syeamore Terrace 10935 Terra Vista Pkwy. 26 of 128 10 Years 80% of Median 8/28/85 Evergreen Apts. 10730 Church 78 of 393 10 Years 80% of Median SECTION 8 ,NEW CONSTRUCTION • 4/82 Woodhaven Manor 6230 Haven Ave. 117 of 117 40 Years Section 8 (cr+FA) 12/82 Don Miguel Apts 985019th St. 40 cf 200 20 Years Section 8 SENIOR HOUSING 2/15/84 Heritage Park Senior Apts. 9601 Lomita Ct. 163'of 233 20 Years 80%of Median 4/17/85 Rudolph Hendrickson 6628 Amethyst 168 of 168 15 Years 80% of Median Total 798 of 2287 ' Inckdes the 15 urYls of Mutlf-FartWy Monpage Rwen» Bond FMuvicinp • A-90 _ ~il~al-r' • TABLEA-28 FOR DISCUSSION: PURPOSES ONLY NEED FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS AS OF DEGEMBER 1988 Identllled Mousdng Needs 1. 1988 Existing Dwelling Units 31,665 2. 1988 Exislina HOUSehnN~ 3°_,°_~! 3. Lower Income Households Overpaying Por Housing 3,069 a Total Very Low Income 1,380 b. Total Low Income 1,689 c. Renters 1,346 Very Low Income 643 Low Income 703 • d. Owners 1,723 Very Low Income 736 Low Income 986 4. Special Needs Households 13,299 a. Handicapped 2,656(1) b. Elderly -Headed 2,297(2) c. Large Families 4,709(3) d. Single Parent 2,029(4) Female Single Parent 1,583 e. Homeless 25 5. Overcrowded Households 1,349(5) 6. Substandard Units 646(6) a. Needing Rehabilitation 538 b. Needing Replacement 108 ® continued... R-91 DRAFT • FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY TABLE A•28 CONTINUED IGntlfled HOUSIng NNde 7. Five Year New Construction Needs 9,566(7) a. Very Low (0-50%of median) 1,117 b. Other Low (50-8096) 1,258 c. Moderate (80.120%) 1,729 a. noove tuWOerate (12D•) 5,463 8. Total New Construction Needs (Line fib + Una 7) 9,676 9. Needed Average Annual Housing Production to Achieve Five Year Goal 1,935(8) 10. New Units Provided From 7/1/89 to 1/1/90 1,890(9) (1) Estimate from the CRye 1988 Housirq AedWance Plan. (2) Estknatetl as 7.7 parcerM of aM oxupiW heusaholde, ooNWent with the 1980 poputatbn. (3) Esenate Irom the Drell ABOrdabk Hatsgtp saategy, Tale II.19. lb) Estimate hem the GNy'e 1988 Hous~lp AS~StahCB Plan. (5) Estlmats horn tlM Wah AIIe/dade HousNp Siratapy, Table II.23. (6) From 9is 1988 FbuaYp AeaisUrcs PFen (HAP). (7) Irtcetdea replacement of tlerrtoAliorts per RIINA (B) IncWdea a8 replacement housYq; total aversped over a five year period. (9) Based on Department of Finance Ealitrtalea for 1989. • A-92 DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONi¢y . Ydli. ENERGY CgISFRYATION OPPORTUNITIES Energy conservation in the home has changed dramatically in the past few years with the adoption of Title 24 of the California Adainistrative Code. This section describes the opportunities associated with State legislation, as welt as opportunities which the City is encouraging as part of its Development Code. The highlights of this section are provided in the list below: * Optional development standards require energy conservation appliances and features and an alternative solar energy system in appropriate situations. * Solar actess and rights are encouraged as part of the 1984 Development Cade. * Enforcement of State energy requirements (Title 24) is a part of the building plan check process. • A-93 ~s~R DIS...~Sa ~N P'URPOSES ONLY Title 24 Under Section 65583(x)7 of the California Government Code, a City's Housing • Element must contain an "analysis of opportunities for energy conservation with respect to residential development." Since the adoption of the Housing Element statutes, the California Energy Commission has established and adopted energy improvement specifications for both single family and multiple family structures under four stories. These energy specifications require both active and passive energy features for all residential developments. The City of Rancho Cucamonga enforces these State Energy requirements for Zone 9~ for both single family and multiple family unit types. DereloD~ent Code In addition to the State requirements, the City has also incorporated as part of the adopted Development Code passive and active solar energy requirements. By using established optional development standards higher densities are allowed than with the conventional development standards. In view of this added dwelling density, tt is required that energy conserving • appliances and features (t.e. reduced water consumption shower heads, water conserving toilets, etc.) and an alternative solar energy system to provide domestic hat water for all dwelling units and for heating a Swimming pool or spa be provided. A specific section an solar access is also included in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. This provides suggestions and opportunities to developers in the preliminary site planning and site designing of a residential development, In the solar access section tt is encouraged that consideration be given to the following areas: ~ Rancho Cucamonga falls into Climate Zone 9 as established by the California Energy Camatsston. • A-94 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1, That nex residential dev~ apments prove^_e for Fuiure passive or • natural heating or cooling opportunities. This can be approached through such listed examples of lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for a southern exposure, or by establishing lot sizes and configurations which permit orientation or a residential structure such that it can take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes. 2, Consideration to local climate, to topography and land contour, to lot configuration and to other design and improvement requirements are encouraged. 3. Consideration Lo the long axis so the majority of individual lots are within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south far adequate exposure for present or future solar energy systems Ts another energy conservation opportunity. 4. Landscape specifications such that no tree or shrub can be Dl aced or grown in such a manner as to interfere with any existing solar collector. 5. Residential planning should consider the ability to provide ail new units with receiving sunlight across adjacent lots or buildings should a solar collector be Cesired and instalied in later years. This would include the establishment of solar easements in the declaration of restrictions for the development. The easements in essence would preclude the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object. The City feels that these special solar conservation criteria of the Development Code in conjunction with Title 24 energy requirements of the State provide maximum opportunities to developers of all residential unit types. The programs established by the Housing Elenent merely reiterate the State and present City opportunities. It is felt that in this way energy conservation is achieved while still providing fl exibility and creativity in residential '~ building design. A-95 DRAFT • FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY IX. EXISTIM& HOUSII6 CONDITIONS This section provides information on the condition of housing units and the extent of overcrowding 1n Rancho Cucamonga. The foilawing are the highlights: * Overall, the housing stock is Tn good condition; however, there are ,..°_ct~ cf ;,~,.~~ a.~~ wiiii cvncensrattans of units in need of repair. * Emphasis must 6e placed on rehabilitation programs to maintain the sound conditlon of the housing stock. * Approximately 7 percent of the City's population live 1n overcrowded dwellings, as defined by the 1980 U. S. Census. • A-96 Neusir,9 Conditions FOR CSISGUSS ON PUFpOSES QN1.Y • Recent estimates by the State Department of Finance indicate that there are 34,449 dwelling units in Rancho Cucamonga as of January 1, 1989. Eighty-five percent of the City's housing stock, or 29,254 units have been constructed since 1970. Since 1%0, 93 percent of the total, or all but 2,250 dwelling units in the City have been constructed. As a result, the general condition of the City's housing stock is very good. Map A-5 shows the median age of the housing stock by year built. There are your specific areas where older units to need of rehabilitation are most likely to occur. This infonaatlon can be used to target areas for the City's rehabilitation programs. Through rehabilitation and amintenance programs for low and moderate income households, the City can help to maintain the current]y sound condition of the vast majority of the housing stock. The survey focused on older areas where poorer housing conditions were likely • to be found. A housing condition windshield survey was conducted by the Planning Division staff in December, 1979. The survey focused on older areas where poorer housing conditions were likely to be fend. Approximately 83 percent of the units surveyed were judged to be in sound condition, 12 percent were deteriorated (units exhibiting serious defects, but can be reasonably rehabilitated), and 4 percent were dilapidated (units which are so far deteriorated that rehabilitation efforts would probably be precluded by cost). The City's HAP prepared 1n April, 1989, estimated that there were 646 substandard housing units of which 538 were suitable for rehabilitation. ~J A-97 z , ~~ 1 °xm 1 m • oa ° o m ~ m ~ ° 0 ~>~ ~ w~ 3qu°i~nn, oo \ Cm0 Jm rn~~~mrn~ ~$. ~ N Z , ~ p O ' ---- aaY¢ y~ '~ y N W N. C a ~a z p o U N x N..+o r N e A-98 • DRAB pasES ONLY pUR survey of the p15GVS510N FOR conducted a lama a and the 01d Alta pivisio^ ards, the Pl annin9 cucamon9 cWres' y in May of 1989. Souu'w¢st the stru n~ber ° i en of hoth the a condition °f addition, the n oP In addition, the assessment, to appliances stored a1 condition a evaluated• Physic ps Part °f and walls wer 1e yehicles, s• gent inoPernb were noted. landscaPln9+ ions.' wrecked, lit imPyOV~ents ri1Y sin9le-f~ilnf 9ara9 end the condition of P°b eocam°n9a area ~ ~a extort°r malortyePairs view 1t 9o S°ut~eihe Os. ea5estructures needeTd rd aaintena°ce e with st ~Wbuilt from taY x940` was foua~~atr~fs Structura~sdeteeiofalan1' in9 dscaP lithe units i tsu n as n~fPaantProbl~^fstre4uirin9 ^'aintenanc l15 Pe.._ to be mo+~ t of the ~~.. devetoPr;. appeared rely 36 Percen is also Primarilt a Present, fencesd Yards Ehe Old plta Loma tarfrda the i194Percentl 8 Percantl • ~~~, .~ ,~•. '. ~ 5n SouthwefamilYaunits+ t7ofPZra ~ q'unlt strue~awJOr rePairnec Ssary ~ Cs single number this area reW min repairs nt the un. or of a are a er with a units i° OnlYwan estimated 12 Perce although ~ of th Half the structu Prof°r<ion mare than q the units. in 0 104 Persons resided involving in this area. only a additional 31 PercenC d that no bathyp0ms or and maintenance indicate its had {eQuired Y the 1980 census ~ellin9 un 100 units had either The vast ~ as ifor heating l87 Percent i infonaat'on fr°m in9+ and nine lint ether s with no PluAbnr shrder. utility 9 cent , Forty' ies. n 4h ~-batn w tn9ti85 Pe centland watereheain9s had nor kiuthe ~e11in9s withWt X76 Percentl, d 107 di1ell the City. central peel nt an cooking in9 eQUiPam of housing unitsercent• pad n° heat er one D e total n°W~ red only tetras of ~ in9 rePresen heating or Pluu~ p-99 tr, J . >:, ~,_ •. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Regarding the number of bedniam;, the 1980 ce^.s~!s indicated that tha majority of unlts in the City (13,500 - 76 percent) had either three or four bedrooms. Fifteen percent of the units had 2-bedrooms, while 6 percent had 1- bedroam Based upon Federal Census, overcrowding is defined as occupancy in excess of l,tli persons per room. Overcrowding is a housing problem primarily restricted to older section of Rancho Cucamonga. According to the 1980 census, 541 units were overcrowded, 396 owner occupied and 195 renter occupied. The number of persons per room was between 1.01-1.50 for 416 units, while 175 units were more seriously overcrowded with 1. Si or roure rar;N~s pcr r-_... arrnrdina to the 1980 census 3,628 persons, or 7 percent, of Rancho Cucamonga's population lived in overcrowded units. Housing Code Fnforcsent The Code Enforcement Oiviston in Rancho Cucamonga currently operates on a complaint response basis. Once a violation i5 reported, an officer will make • personal contact, in addition to providing a written notice requesting correction of the violation. If progress toward compliance is not observed within 2 weeks, a multi-step process begins, which involves additional noticing and in some cases can lead to tha issuance of a Court Appearance Citation. The overall emphasis of the Lode Enforcement program is La ensure that progress toward correction of violations 9s achieved on a voluntary basis, In order to achieve this end, one focus of the Code Enforcement program has been toward ordinance improvement, to provide the City with the ability to remedy specific problems. Two recently approved ordinances set specific criteria for public nuisance and vehicle abatement. Additional areas of operation include property maintenance and aesthetics, land use and zoning, parking control, animal regulation, pereits and development, weed abatement, vector control, as well as commrnity awareness. A-100 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The eventual goal of the Code Enforcement Division is to shift the emphasis of • the program from one that is complaint oriented to one that is more proactive. This type of program would then be able Lo focus on specific neighborhoods, particularly those which are basically sand but just beginning to shoN signs of deterioration, or Tt could focus on specific issues such as vehicle abatement or yard maintenance. It is likely that this type of program wfll evolve as the City's Rousing stock increases and the pace of growth slaws and as increased expenditures became available to hire additional personnel. A-101 ~t~aFF FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY X. COAS7RAINTS 70 1HE DEYEI.OPMFi1T ~' NOUSI116 This section discusses Lhe potential governmental and market constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels. The constraints include areas such as public services and development fees, school overcrowding, timing and financing of infrastructure, housing prices, and the effect of interest rates on home buyers. The following are the highlights: * Although development fees add 7-8 percent to the cost of new housing they are necessary to assure that new development will have adequate public services and improvements. * Timing and financing of school constructico, arc sewer and cater facilities must be coordinated with residential growth to provide adequate services. * Major storm drain and channel projects require long-term financing tecfiniques in order to eliminate development constraints. * Laver interest financing rates are critical to providing affordable housing. A-102 • Governmental Corstraiwts pRp ~ FOR DISGUSSION PURPOSES ONLY A. Land Ike and Toning: The City's General Plan establishes six residenttal density categories "for purposes of providing the City with a range of building intensities that allow flexibility to deal with varlaus site constraints and appormnities,' The density ranges of these residential categories are as follows: DensltY Range uug~Y Mlnir~ Maltio Yery Low lYL) 0.1 2 Lor (L) 2 4 Lor Media (LM) 4 8 Med1u• (M) 8 14 Mediia High (Mlq 14 24 High (H) 24 30 • In addition to these residential categories, the General Plan provides for three open space ategories, two of which auly allow sae residential derelapoent based upon resu1;3 of enrtranuental studies. The Hillside Residential designation permits lt~ited develeiwent up to 2 dwelling units to the acre. The (yen Space designation fdentifies areas where larM 1s to resin essentially open, but residential derelapment syy be permitted at a density not to exceed 1 dwelling unit per 10 acres. The rearming (yen Space category is desigr~ted as Flood Control/Utility corridor, and no residential dereloparnt 1s penaitted in this area. Rancho Cuca~enga's residential derelap~ent requirerents contained in the City's Developarnt Code and the four coamunity derelapment plans, which arc Identified an Imp A-2, (Etiranda Specific Plan, Ylctorla Coaa~unlty Plan, Terra WsU Coawmity Plan, and the Caryn Co~unlty Plan), allow restdmttal zoning categories and densities that are consistent wiM the City's General Plan. A-103 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES QfdL.Y The basic development standards contained in Nkese plans arc generally crosistent, although tbey have been tailored to acct the specific needs • identified within each of the ca~uMty planning areas. [n the Terra Yista and WcLOria Ca~unlty Plans, provisions have been added to allot cluster devNapmenL in the La Mediuu and Ilediu• residential categories. (Cluster derelapuent is autocratically assuaed Tn the higher density categories.) In additim, both plans have been designed to atiw flexibility in trading densities aax»tg different areas within each plan without requiring a Genenl Plan Irendaent as lag es the maxiau density permitted by the plan is not exceeded. Both plans perratt tacA residential land use deslgnatioa to be stepped up or down one ategory, except for the Mediucr residential category which allots two steps up, to either the Ikdiu• High or High density range. Samnrhat different frw the Terra Ytsta and WMOr1a Coaaanity plans, the Devel apcrent Code and Etiranda Sped flc Plan utilise the appl lcsti on of a density Hoge concept. This concept allots for the use of basic and optional developaent standards. Projects which meet the cr1ni~ basic standards arc permitted to develop at densities rhtch are at the lower end of each density range- Protects which acct the generally more denanding Dptlanal Standards, in tencrs of greater provision of open space, buffering, and recreational area facilities ~ develop at the higher cud of each density Hoge. Asa trade- off, under the Optimal Standards rany of the development requtrecrents, including setbacks and lot corenge, are reduced to aaaaaxrdnte the higher densities. Other standards such as parking and Height requirestents generally do not provide crostnint to development except in the core sensitive htllside areas there heights arc 11~1ted to 30 feet. However, throughout the raainder of the City, heights are generally permitted to increase with increased density. Parking 1s based upon the unit type and nuaber of bedrooas, with carports permitted in ~lti-family devetopcrents with approval fro. the Design Review Ca~lttee. A-104 DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION l~URPOSE:S ONLY • OeRrail then, the City's developneeet standards are based upon acceptable provisims and are not exceptiural or muwal, and in fact are cursistent with those of wrroweding ca~simities. The provisims allured order the Terra Vista, Wctorta, and Caryn Coaaunlty Plans are soaewhat less deauending than those cmtalnrd in the City's Oereloparnt Code and Etirenda Specific Plan, but this reflects the mique co>•unity charackr within each of these plannieg areas. In fact, the variability of development skndsrds allured through iapleaentatiur of the City's Land Use Plan, Develoo~ent District ear ..~ Coe~mity Plans permits a ride variety of housing types k be provided, including single and sultl-fa~ily, rental and ownership, as well as agblle hoeees. As a rewlt, applicatim of these developaknt standards ur the rsaining vaunt land resources rill emtinue t0 enable a broad range of hosing alkrnatives and the ability for the City to meet its share of the Regtural Housing Need as shone Tn Table A-15. • B. Building Codes and Enforteaeent: The City of Rancho Cutaaxnga Ms adapted, by reference, the Stale Unifona, Adainistrative, Building, Mechanical, Plwa6ing, Housing, Building SecuHtiy, Uniforw Stgn and Abate~ent for Dangerous Building Codes. These codes are crosidered to be the adniu necessary to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare. Additimal skndards, MFPA 13D and 13R of the National Fire Protectim Association, have been adapted whits require that all new residential dre111ngs be curstrockd rltfi an installed spHnkler syste. This is required in order to protect the public"s health, safety, aM welfare and is not crosidered an eamecessary constraint to housing. A diswssim of housing code enforceaent is curtained in Sectlur 9 of this chapter. In addltlen to the standard code enforosent prectices, the City encourages the prcserwtim of significant hlskric structures through applicatim of the State Historic Building Code, Title 24, Part 8, of the California Adainistratlre Code rhith per~its the use of original or archaic autterials 1n reconstructiur. Also, the City utilizes the optims available in A-105 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Section 1233 of the 411fornia AdNnistrative Code, which allows an agency to • exercise 'reasonable Judgeaent in the application of requirements" regarding the cantineed use of existing strucwres. As the awJority - 1.e., 93 percent - of the City's hausing stock was built after 1960, and with 85 percant constructed since 1970, it is 1n relatively good condttien with fa bulldtngs needing repair or rcconstwction. However, for those strocwres which do need repair, the Lity enforces those standards and regulations which ensure reasonable and adequate life safety, but allows the exercise of taidgacnt in application of standards and regulatims as peradtted 1n the Code so as to not unduly penalize older dwellings that were built under less deanding codes. C. Residential Reviw Process: The City's standard review pratess, fro the tine of formal applicatim s~ittal thraugA review by the Flaming Ca~ission is an eleven reds process. Th1s includes review before the varlas reca•nnding review • coaittees including the Ew•ading, Technical Review, Design Reuter, and Trails Coaittces when applicable. TAe process is set up so that all of the necessary reviewing depardents, including Building and Safety, Engineering, Coamunity Services, Sheriff, and the FTre Departsent arc Involved in prglect review fro the earliest stages. As a result, City agencies function in a coordinated Tamer and the applicant is appraised of a~iy concerns early 1n the review process. Tkts review format is used for all types of protects including industrial, co~erctal, and residential. Yhile the actual review process n;y extend beyond the eleven reds period in cone uses due to the complexity of the protect, identified significant environmental issues or iredegwte plans it does not very in lengLA for single fatly as caparcd to aultl-fatly protects. In fact, it is often those single fatly pro~etts looted in envirarrentally sensitive areas that take longer to review. A-106 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Aiihougit the review process 1s not typically longer for multi-fatly type • protects, staff can investigate methods by which it may be possible to reduce even furNer the length of the revier time for multi-fatly protects with affordable wits proposed. Therefore, Program 8. A.3 bas been Included to the five year action plan rhich states that the City shall evaluate the review processing procedure to allw expedited revier for affordable protects utllizimJ 20 percent set aside funds or for multi-fatly protects with units affordable to lower and moderate income households. D. Schools: As a result of the rapid growth prior to incorporation the local school districts have in the past and still face severe overcrowding, To assure far adequate school space, the City requires developers to obtain written certification from elementary and high school districts to which the protect site is located stating that adequate school capacity is available before a residential tract map is recorded and/or building penwtts are issued. The concern among the school districts is their inability to finance the • construction of new school facilities since Proposition 13. The districts are currently relying on developers fees to pay fer the cost of temporary facilities for new students. Prior to 1981, the City required written certification (will serve letters) from elementary and high school districts stating that adequate schooi facilities were available. In this system, each school district determined the amount of the developer fee to be charged on a per unit basis for single- family and multi-family developments. With the approval of new legislation (AB 2926 and related amenAnents, AB 1929 of 1988 and AB 181 of 1989), which became effective on January 1, 1987, a state mandated local program was imposed which also required written certification by the appropriate school district but sets specific limits on the fee amounts. In addition, fees are maw also required for commercial and A-107 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY industrial develo{snents es weil as for residential projects. me maximum fees • imposed were originally set by the State and may be increased every two years according to adJustment for inflation. The bill also established a method for providing interim classroom facilities when overcrowding conditions exist. A city may require the dedication of land, payment of in-lieu fees or a combination of these two as a condition of approvai. AS a result, the individual districts may require fees in addition to those sei by the State. As shown in Table A-27, two of the five school districts, Etiwanda and Cucamonga, require foes in addition to those set Dy the State. TABLE Adz SCHOOL FEES FOR COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED BY RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICTS AS OF MAY 1890 r1 u Alta Loma $.18/Sq. Ft. $.48/Sq.Ft Central $.18/Sq.Ft. $1.08/Sq.Ft.' Cucamonga $.18~Sq.Ft. $1.0&'Sq.Ft. $2.000;du Etiwanda $.18/Sq.Ft. $1.08/Sq.Ft. $1,758.94/du Chaffee Joint Union High School $.08/Sq.Ft. $.48lSq.Ft. • The Central, Cueanarga and Hiwanda School Districts have Indicated that they vd9 be raiairp their resi- dantlel tees to St.10 as W June 1, 1990. The Asa Loma ScMol DlstACt is errantly h the plooess d evaluatlnp thek tse amouras and may raise them aometena in the IuWre. A-108 • s:. Oevei DR4FT • opment Fees: POR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY The City of Rancho Cucamonga charges a number of fees which affect the price of housing. However, the fees such as drainage, schools, sewer, and water are necessary for public safety and for the City and other public agencies to maintain an adequate level of public services for new deveiopaent. Table A-26 illustrates fees Tn Rancho Cucamonga for a 1,256 square foot single famtiy have with a 2-car garage on an 8,000 square foot lot. The fees total E30,435.90 and represent 7.7 percent of the total cost of a new hone at a price of 5136,000.8 • 8 Ynformation provided by Great Nestern Real Estate. The median sales price for a have 1n Rancho Cucamonga in 1969 was f136,000 with a square footage of 1,265 feet. A-109 ~~~ FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • TABLE A-28 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FEES (1265 SQUARE FOOT HOME, 2 CAR GARAGE, 8,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT, NO DECKS OR PATIOS, IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) TVne of Fes ~Q,u Building Permit $439.50 Plan Check $329.63 Drainage $900.00 Systems Fees $704.00 beautification $333.00 Park 51,568.57 Water and Sewer $4,190.00 Aha Lama School District (Sae Table A-27) $1,366.00 Chaffee Joint Union High School District $607.20 Total 5/0,435.90 Source: 1989 Budding Depanmerq Fee Schedub • A-110 DRAFT • F. Amiexations: FOR D(SirUSS10N PURPOSES ONLY The City is currently 36.5 square miles to size and is approximately 60 percent developed. Since 1984 the City has annexed an estimated 2.2 square miles of residential land in the northern sphere area. Of the remaining vacant, uncommitted residential acreage in the City (2,533.74 acres) approximately 28.6 percent, or 724.81 acres, allays for a density of 8 dwelling units or greater. For this reason, annexations are currently not necessary to provide adequate sites for affordable housing. In addition, much of the land in the City's sphere area is in hillside terrain and therefore will probably be developed at lover densities and have increased costs due to structural design requirements. G. Mster Supply: The existing water supply system presents no immediate constraints in housing development. The Cucamonga County Mater District's (CCMD) area includes over • 50 square miles of which Rancho Cucamonga occupies 75 percent. In 1987 the CCMD updated their Mater System Master Pian. The future water demands for the District were derived from projected population growth and land use. The demand in 1967 was estimated at 26,700 Acre Feet (AF) and was projected to increase to an annual requirement of over 38,000 AF in 1990 and to almost 4b,000 AF in 1995. the District's total annual demand is estimated to increase to over 170 percent to 73,000 AF at the time of ultimate build-out (estimated as 2015). In addition, the District's present maxtmun day demand of 46 million gallons per day (mgd) is predicted to increase rapidly to more than 68 mgd in 1990, and to almost 82 mgd in 1995 and to over 130 mgd at ultimate developnent. A-111 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSF_S ONLY The District has three sources of supply: ground waixr, local surfaca (canyon) water, and imported surface water through the Metropolitan water • District of Southern California (MND). Groundwater is currently the primary source of supply for the district. However, as the local grounMater and canyon sources are already near their maximum sustainable yields, Imported surface water will become a primary source of water in the future. The District has estimated that approximately 45,000 AF of water rill be needed at the time of ultimate development and that sufficient water will be available from MWD to meet the projected demand. Therefore, the existing water supply system presents no immediate constraint toxard the future development of housing. H. Sewer Systeas: A limited capacity of Lhe existing sewer system can present a short term constraint on housing development. The Cucamonga County Water District Stier System Master Plan, which was Drepared in 1984, encompasses the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Ontario an6 surrounding unincorporated land in San Bernardino County. Currently, all existing CCND wastewater flows to the Chino • Basin Municipal Mater District Regional Treatment Plant No. 1 (RP1). The capacity at RPS is currently 32 ngd and is in the process of being expanded to 44 mgd, with an expected completion date of the fall of 1990. The ultimate capacity at RPl is planned for 96 mgd, however, flow projections Indicate that 120 mgd wilt be necessary to handle ultimate development of the service area. To handle these additional flaws, an additional treatment plant (RP4) is planned in order to handle the treatment capacity deficiency, and will have a capacity of 28 mgd. Therefore, although a limited capacity of the existing serer system can present short term constraint to housing development, it appears that there will be wfficient capacity Tn the system to meet the projected demand. A-112 DRAFT :. Flood Protection: F13R L?ISCUSSIpI,! PL'P.POSES Ot~1Lv • Inadequate and missing drainage facilities present a mayor constraint to development in the Ctty. There are various levels of drainage facilities that are required to provide adequate flood protection. As shown 1n Nap A-6, the larger Regional and Secondary Flood Control Channels such as Day Creek, Deer Creek and Etiwanda/San Sevaine are owned and maintained by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to which the City contributes a share, which is funded through the collection of drainage fees, Master plan facilities and local drainage facilities are City awned and operated. Typically, development i5 reyuireu i.u ~wmuu~e vimx dc,: wua K~ y,.:u ~~~ Lity, also through the collection of drainage fees. A-113 E3~,4FT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • EYw~W ear or.r or. a e..e um.r E.. " % ~a ara~ rr~r~.r ~ ^^ ~ ~ni/N . Yes EYw,W~ e~d.r r„~~ 8pa~iq fiarib • ~ Awiru VIebY dM • fir ~Fdl E~N» a.r w.d,.r MAP M8 "''+" c~.r FLOOD CONTROL Faou~ ~~ MASTER PLAN '~'~~ OF DEVELOPMENT LEGEND ~+ ® Regional Mainline ~~ a.r.w. Drainage Facilities w.d.~+ W ~iO~'r ® Etiwanda/San Sevaine ~,~ e~__ Drainage Area .Q. NO-tl1 A-114 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • In the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Master Dl an area, development south of Highland Avenue cannot occur until new drainage facilities are installed. The cost for the new Pacilities is generally beyond the financial capabilities of an individual developer and will require long-term financing camni4nents, such as the establishment of assessment distracts as permitted in the 1982 Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act and Lhe Improvement Act of 1913. Market Constraints Risfng housing costs are a constraint to providing adequate housing for all econaatc segments of the community. Between 1970 and 1980 the increase in housing costs rose three Lines the growth rate of household incomes. This increase has forced renters and homebuyers to spend greater proDOrtions of their monthly intone for housing and to seek smaller, less expensive units. According to the 1980 census, the mean value of non-condatnium housing was 589,733. Based on the information from the TRN Reai Estate Market Information • Service, the average house price in Rancho Cucamonga in 1989, including new and resale condominiums and single-family units, was 5170,921. This represents an increase Tn housing costs by 90.4 percent. Assuming the buyer is able to put 20 percent don and the mortgage rate is 10.5 percent, the monthly payment Including principal and interest, tax and insurance would he approximately 1,477.5 per month. The qualifying income for this mortgage wou id be approximately 59,100 per year, based on maximum monthly payments equal to 30 percent of the gross household incase. Land prices, construction costs, and financing are mayor factors which contribute to the price of housing. 1Me following is a diswssian of those factors as they affect housing availability in Rancho Cucamonga. A-115 DRAFT A. Land and Construction CostsFC?R DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Local residential developers with a variety of unit types in planning and constwction phases in the City were surveyed in January, 1984 by the Planning Divfsion staff to deterwtine raw land prices and construction costs. These costs averaged approximately E30 per square foot for both single-family and multi-family protects, but land prices varied by D15tritt as shown on Table A- 29. As the density range on land increases so does the price. However, to terms of land cost per Melling unit, the "VL" District (less than 2 dwelling units/acre) is the most expensive. Public improvements, not included in tho land prices sham, are also hfgh pre unit with lower density projects. TABLE A-29 • ESTIMATED LAND COSTS BY DISTRICT, 1984 Cost Rmny~ VL (less than 2duiac) L (2-4 dWac) LM (4-8 d Wac) M (8-14 dWac) MH (14-24 dWac) H (24-30 dWac) .~35 -40,000 S50. 80.000 $80 - 100,000 5100 -135,000 a1 so -17s,ooo y17s,000 + source: PWnnkp Divsion Stan survey a bcal davslopers, January 1se4 A-116 • DRAFT' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Recent estimates of land cosis have been deveioped based on the assessed value • of actual land sales, which were obtained from Chicago Title and estimates provided by Lewis Haines. Land prices are generally higher than they were in 1984 particularly in the Miltiple Family Residential district, as sham in Table A-30. TABLE A - 30 ESTIMATED LAND COSTS BY DISTRICT, 1989 6lat l t (Z 1 Costtianp~ r oM C • ~~~ VL (less than 2 dWae) 331 -80,000 L 8 LM (2 -8 dWac) 360 - 100,000 M(8-14dWac) 5720.190,000 MH & H (14-30 du/ac) 3140 -200,000 Source: Plotrdnp Oivbion Statl W+~vN' u611tlinp ktlomvmion ADm CNapo Title am watl as Womation from tnw Lewis Homes Devslapmenl Company ® A-117 DRAFT B. Financing: FOi;c QISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY In order to abLSn infonastion on the availability of financing in the • Coaawnity, the City has surveyed the twelve lending institutions that have offices or branch offices located in Rancho Cucamanga_ The banks were questioned regarding the general availebility of financing to all areas of the City and the possibility that interest rates varied far different areas of the camanity, in addition, the Ctty ras able to obtain from Bone of the institutions, capiu of their 1990 Camaunity Reinvestment Act Stataents, (Hone Fed, Wneyand National Bank, and Back of Aaerica). Asa result, the Ct1;y ras provided Wth verbal and mitten ststements by these institutions affir>ting that their lending practices are based upon each individual applicants creditworthiness without regard to such factors u sez, race, age, narital status, or without regard to income level or racial ca•position of an area or the age w location of a dwelling. Also, bash upon evidence of construction activity an ava7lable vacant land, residential financing appears to be generally available throughout the City. • There is no evidence of aqy eortgage deficient areas of new canstredlon or rehabilitation loans. In addition, the City alrea~r offers and Wll cantimu to offer, a repair grant program for senior and disabled or handicapped persons for nlnor housing needs as cell as a hawing rehabilitation and repair loan program that offers both deferred loan pay>•ant3 and la interest loans to leer income households, through the Comrunity Oevelopaent Blair Grant Ftiogra. It is apparent that a large proportion of the City's households are and will continue to be priced out of the housing market. Because the factors contributing to the high cost are largely beyond the City's control, the home ownership market aill remain beyond the financial capability of a large number of households to the City. Therefore, the City will have to take an active role in providing a limited (because of limited resources) number of housing units. A-118 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY %I EYALUATIdI OF THE HOUSlM6 ELEMENT'S PAST 60AL, POLICIES, OBJECTIVES AMD M106RAMS This section provides a review of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the previous goal, policies, and programs contained in the 1984 Housing Eleaent Update. The following are sane of the significant results of this review: * An estimated 11.7 percent of the employees surveyed in 1989 live and work in the City. This percentage is expected to increase as the large amount of vacant commercial and industrial land develops over the next several years. * The City has provided assistance for the repair and rehabilitation of existing affordable housing stork through the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds. * A wide variety of housing unit types has been encouraged through implementation of the Land Use plan, Development Districi Map and the Community Plans on the vacant tend resources of the City. * Since 1984, 52.7 percent of the housing constricted in Terra Vista has been affordable to persons making 120 percent or less of the area median incase. A-119 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Sectien '5588 of the G^_vernrzrt Ccde requires That each local government • review its housing element on a periodic basis and that as part of this review, the appropriateness and effectiveness of the previous goals, policies, abtectives, and programs De evaluated. The analysis should include a review of the actual results of the previous housing program and should contain an analysis of the difference between what was protected and what was accamDlished. The overall goal of the 1984 Housing Element revision was is follows: The City shall provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety °f ~"'=-'•ca `vr="• :~ ~• ~ ~~~vric segalnSS M7Sh11aJ t0 rlSide in the COralnity regardless of rau, religion, sex, or income group. Sn the preWaus elsent, three policy statearerrts were identified as generally cmtrlbuting tawrd pursuit of the City's housing goal. Hoverer, policy stateaents arc intended to serve as guides to decision awdCing tmrd achiersent of ab,~ectlves as well as contrl6uting tovard the overall goal. AS a result, as part of the el sent update, these and additional policy statealtmts rerc axw•o specifically written to serve as guides toward achievsent of specific obtettives. Throughout the last five years, since 1984, the Ctty has made strides towards accomplishing the above stated goal. This has occurred primarily through implementation of ±he seven obtectives an6 related policies and programs contained in the 1984 Housing Element which are discussed below. ilalECnvE 1 Promote and encourage housing opportunities so that is is desirable for 30 percent of the proiected caanercial and in~strlal erylgyed households in the City t0 lire and work in the City. A-120 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • The intent for establishment of this ablective 1s two fold. The first is to provide employment and adequate housing for persons who wish to work and live in this area. The second is to provide employment and housing in proximity to one another so commuter patterns are lessened, thus having a beneficial effect on air quality, congestion management, public transit and general energy efficiency. By accomplishing the second purpose of this obJective, the Ctty will also be contributing efforts toward accomplishment of a regional ,lobs/hosing balance, which is one of the goals contained in SCAG's Growth Management V7an. LnplTCitly included in this ob,{ective is also the determination of a realistic capture rate for the City. A capture rate of 30 percent is considered to be the maximum nunher of employees that the City could realistically expect to ifve and work in Rancho Cucamonga at any one time. In 1980, approximately 10 percent mf the residents employed in Rancho Cucamonga also worked in the City. Havever, in a recent survey of the 21 largest employers in Rancho Cucamonga, these companies were found to have a capture rate of approximately • 11.7 percent, representing only a slight increase over the 1980 figure. This continued iow capture rate may be due to the increased cost of housing in recent years and the still large amounts of undeveloped commercial and industrial land in the City. A step toward achieving the City's maximum rapture rate may be realized through the continued monitoring of Rancho Cucamonga's ma,lor employers and newly proposed commercial and industrial developments as well as the development and implementation of programs that wand encourage or assist locally generated employees to live in the City. ACTION: As this alyective is determined to be of importance in assisting the City achieve an appropriate ~abs/housing balance, it shall be cmtinued in the revised element. Several programs, 4.A.1 through 4.A.5, mrhlch serve as a means to better track and assist Tn the aMierememt of a higher upiLrc rate, have been included in the element. A-121 DRAF'T' PAasww i.l ~~~ Lll'=CUSSiON PiiRPc7uE5 ONLY • Determine the incase levels of future ca~ercial and industrial employed households in order to identify the affordable hWSing ranges in ell incase groups of the expected nd households. A one time study of the 21 largest employers in the City was completed in 1989 to evaluate the number of local employees who currently reside in Rancho Cucamonga. tt was Pound that 11.) percent of the employees surveyed both live and work in the City. However, this survey did not evaluate the wage or salary levels of these employees. As a result, it is not known haw nany employees cannot afford to live in the Ctty as opposed to those who choose to live elsewhere. As this information is important in determining a realistic capture rate and assessing future housing needs, it is recommended that ft be included in future studies. This program should be developed to accomplish two aims. First, to determine • the number of existing employees who live and work in the City, and secondly to assess the future employee base and housing needs. Therefore, monitoring and review of existing maJor employers as well as monitoring of new commrercial and industrial employers shauid occur on an annual basis. fie program would require employers to provide the City with Information regarding the City of residence of their employees as well as the number of future projected employees, mployee Job ciassificattons, wage and salary ranges, and the number of erployees with secondary Incomes. ACTION: AS a result of the above analysis, Program 1.1 was eliminated and Wo acre specific Programs, 1. A.1 and 4.A.2, were included in the revised elamert to better address awnitoring of new and existing emlloyers. A-122 y~ ~R.4FT • PRD6RAM i.2 P(jR 4IISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Expand the City's data base management system to Include a residential, industrial, and commercial mmitoring systea of proposed pro~erts. This program has been completed. The City routinely compiles information for a Monthly Status Report, which tracks the status of all on-going projects, and is available in tabular form. In con,iunction with the Monthly Status Report, the Planning Division produces a Residential Application and a Camnercf al/Industrial Applications Map. These maps are updated periodically and provide a graphic representation of the Monthly Status Report. As a result of this Information, the City is better able to keep an accurate record of all ongoing development and is also able to provide information to prospective haaebuyers regarding new residential protects which are to the process. This program should be continued. . ACTIDM: AS a result of the wccess of this progra in tracking an-going pro3ects, it is to 6e continued as Program 4.A.5 to the revised element. PR06RIY1 1.3 Develop an 'equity share" progra for local employment participation. The intent of this program was to encourage local employers to assist employees in the purchase of a new home. Generally, in an equity sharing situation, an investor (ea¢loyer or City) would assist in the financing of a home, usually by contributing to a dawn payment, with the result that all parties share the equity on the title. This type of program could be generally useful Tn situations where a company generates a large nuaber of low to moderate incase employees. A-123 DRAFT' FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY An equity share program has not been actively pursued by the City. However, • it is a program which could be utilized to assist in the provision of affordable housing and could become even more attractive if the results of the employer survey show a large disparity between employee incomes and housing costs. ACTION: Therefore, this prograe shall be cmtinned as 4.A,3, but is to be codified in such a manner that it will be developed based upon the results of the eonitoring required in prericus programs. In add9t;nn ±n t".: ;,~,-oy,~, nencianea aDOVe, additional encouragement and assistance should be provided to local employees to meet their housing needs. Ole method could involve the development of a housing information service. M example of this program would be to require developers to provide announcements to local employers of housing units for sale or rent 30 days prior to offering the units to the general public. These announcements would be posted in places of local employment. ACTION: As a means toward assisting local agloyees to meet their housing needs, a Rousing information prograc, 4.A.4, shall be added to the revised element. OBJELTIYE 2 Conserve and f~rove the existing housing stud, and el9einate the causes and spread of blight and deterloratfon Dy encouraging the investment of public and private funds in housing rehabilitation and puDllc lagrovemenis. In addition to the provision of new housing it is imperative that the existing housing stock and the few older neighborhoods in the City be maintained in good condition to ensure a continued supply of quality affordable housing. A-124 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY . Tf',e majority of the programs which are utilized to address the needs identified Tn this objective are met through the CDBG program. As part of this program, specific areas or populations in need are targeted for assistance. Program objectives are evaluated on a yearly basis based on the identified need. Assistance has either been provided directly to lower income and/or special need groups, in the form of housing rehabilitation loans or grants, or has been used to provide public improvements, such as street improvements, street lights, sidewalks, and parkway landscaping. These additions improve the living environments in older neighborhoods and prevent the deteri ors ti an of the transports ti an infrastructure. ACTION: As the prcservatlan of the existing housing stock is of great irportance in contributing torard maintaining the City's affordable housing stock, it is necessary that this ebiective be continued. Horever, a provision shall be adde6 rhieh specifically addresses the preservation of historic structures. In addition, a ner prograra, 2.A.1, has been added to the revised eleavvrt to address historic rehsbfiitatia~. PR06RAM 2.1 Identify areas of the City ritir concentrations of older hosing units which ~Y be targeted for rehabilitation and Tnprovearart prograaa. This program has been completed. Five target areas have been identified and include East and Nest Northtawn, Southwest Cucamonga, Old Alta Lama, and Etiwanda south of Foothill. These are generally small areas, much less than a census tract. Because of the mix of older and newer development in each tract, only two of these areas, East and Nest Northtown, were reported in the 1980 census as having over 51 percent of the households earning less than 80 percent of the regional median household income and therefore were eligible to receive assistance in the forvr of upgraded public improvements. In 1985, the City commissioned a survey of the Old Atta Loma and Southwest Cucamonga to determine whether any portion of these areas could be shown to be over 51 A-125 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY percent low and moderate income households. only a portion an one street in • Old Alta Loma clearly qualified, while several in Southwest Cucamonga did. It remains to be seen whether North torn will again qualify as a lower intone nefghborhood in the 1990 census. However, the City should continue to evaluate possible target areas including Etiwanda, south of Foothill Boulevard. ACTION: As a result, this pragrs shall be continued Tn the revised el sent as Program 2.0.1, to alloy the City to assist targeted areas with rehsbilltatian a~ taprovsent pragraam. PRO6RIW 2.2 Develop a Redevelopment Agency rehabilitation loan progro wMcb raid provide rehabilitation and repair assistance to lay and awderate income households. This program was never developed. Under current restrictions imposed by the • Western Center for Law and Poverty Settlement, any housing unit which receives assistance fro the Agency's 20 percent set aside fund must remain affordable for at least 30 years. This restriction effectively eliminates the feasibility of a conventional rehabilitation loan program, since it would limit the haaeowner's equity growth for that 30 year period. However, the Redevelopment Agency will consider a program for non-profit purchase and rehabilitation of existing housing under the 20 percent set aside ROA Housing Strategy that may allow a version of this program to work. ACTION: As this program is iro longer possible due to the provisions of the settlsent rith the Yestere Center for Law and Poverty, it shell be discontinued. However, Progrems S.A.7 and 9.A.1, rhlcb address the develalaent of the Redevelapast Agency's Affordable Rasing Strategy and revisions to the Nosing El sent to ensure consistacy rith the strategy, shall be added to the rcNsed element. A-126 vNa~i,>li 2-~ G~--T FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Operate a repair grant program far senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons for minor housing needs, The City has exceeded the original target of providing assistance to 20 households on an annual basis, fora total of 100 grants. In fact, in the last five years the City has provided a total of 184 grants. '~'° " nc` p°y: ;w. is ° roci.iwu of assisting Imver incpne, and special needs households improve the quality of their housing and prevent the deterioration of the housing stack which otherwise might result from a lack of resources. ACTION: As this program has been successfully utilized and 1t is anticipated that it rill continue to be so, it should 6e conti~wed as part of the rtvised element as Program 2.6.2. • PNasNAly 2.a Operate a housing rehabilitation and repair loan program that offers both deferred Ian payments and law interest loans to la income households. The loan program utilized by the City are further described below: a. The Low Interest Loan Program provides amortized low-interest loans to owners of single-family residences occupied by lower- income persons, excluding mobile homes. A-127 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY b, The Deferred Loan Program-provi des non-amortized loans to senior • citizens, households headed by handicapped persons and very low income families who are owner-occupants of single-family residences, excluding mobile homes. The loans are due and payable upon sale of the hare. In the last five years the City has provided a total of 14 loans to qualified persons. This is significantly below the anticipated target of 20 loans on an annual basis for a total of 100 loans over the last 5 years. The reason for the low usage of the Drogram ma.y be due in large Dart to the fact that the program was County run and it was not aggressively publicized. In addition, the Cartty generally did not emphasize the availability of the deferred payment loans and instead focused on low Interest, single item rehabilitation loans. As a result of concern with the lack of interest and usage of the loans, the City, as of fiscal year 1989-90, has opted to take over the running of the program. The intent is to focus more heavily on use of deferred loans for • more extensive, comprehensive repairs. In fact, it is anticipated that 75 percent of the available money will be used fora deferred loan program. ACTION: It is therefore recommended that this program be continued with modifications as discussed above, and included as Program 2.B.3 of the revised element. PN06RAM 2.5 Provide public improvements/community facilities such as street improvseets, street lights, sidewalks, and parlnaly landscaping, in qualified target areas. By repairing and upgrading public improvements in the North town and Southwest Cucamonga areas and in combination with law interest loans and grants, the City hopes to encourage private investment in the area and to ensure all residents a safe and pleasant living environment. • A-I28 DRAFT FoR DISCUSSION PuR~os- (~yy Vy . Since 1980, necessary public improvements have been added to they No~rth~dwn target area. In fiscal year 1987-88, ma,~or public improvements were completed in the Worthtown area and the City's focus shifted to Southwest Cucamonga. As of 1989, 6 streets in Southwest Cucamonga were in the process of being upgraded. Typically, improvements involved resurfacing the street and construction of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Where needed inprovements also included installation of street lights as well as water and sewer improvements. ACTION: It fs recommended that this program be continued and that improvmnent of public infrastructure in the Southwest Cucamonga area be completed. Further, the City should continue to determine additional target areas in need of further improvement including old Alta Lama and Etiwanda, south of Foothill Boulevard. Program 2.C.1 has Dttn included in Me elaent. ONJ~TIYE 3: • Allow and create new opportunities which enable a broad range of housing types, site desigM, construction methods, arM maintain a balanced wpply of ownership and rental units. The City's General Plan allows for a broad range of housing types including owner and rental, which will allow opportunities for the development of housing at all income ranges. Development of the City's vacant land resources in the past five years has allowed for a mix of unit types. Additionally, maintenance of the City's existing suppiy of rental stock is accanplished through implementation of a Condominium Conversion Ordinance. A-129 DRAF'7 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ACTION: As this objective hgs been wttcssfui in furthering the City's . overall housing goal of providing 'a variety of housing types for all economic segments" of the caaaamity, 1t shall be continued. Also, to help meet this objtctivt, two additional programs (3. A.2 and 3. A. 3) have been added to the revised element t0 address the wpply and maintenance of mobile homes in the City, as the previous elearnt did not specifically address mobile hones. PR06RAM 3.1 lAe City shall facilitate the opportunity for a variety of housino tyeoa rhr_-~ ;;,~ implementation of the Und Use Plan, Development District Mlp and the Cammmtty Pleas m the repining vacant land resources of the City. In the last five years, since 1984 through 1989, the City has experienced a tremendous surge of growth. In this time, the housing stock increased a total of 15,244 units, as estimated by the State Depar4aent of Finance, which has far exceeded the City's estimated target of 8,028 units in this same time • period, and in fact has exceeded the 1983 RHAF1 estimate for 1989 of 12,442 units. Based upon Building and Safety records for this same time period, of the total nu~er of dwelling units issued permits, approximately 33.5 percent were for apartment units. As comparism, in the five years preceding, from 1919 through 1983, the number of multi-family apartments constructed totaled 24 percent of the total development. It is anticipated, based upon the remaining vacant residential land, that a large proportion of the new housing constructed in the City will be at densities of 8 dwelling units to the acre or greater which indicates a higher percentage of multi-family product. This indicates that the City's growth fs following a standard pattern of residential development in expanding urban areas. That is, the predominance of single family development occurs early in a Immunity's growth, to be followed by multi-family infTil type development. This development is facilitated throw the use of multiple zming categories rhich allow for a broad range of densities, from less than 2 dwelling units per acre up to 30 A-130 DRAF!!!~7- drelling units per ~acreCI18 ~!Q ddiption p~J'ie ~se~~-~uic one • Bevel optional ailment standards, as peraitted in the Development CoM and Etiwnda Specific Plan, ally a range of development from the loner to the upper ends of each zoning district density range. The basic development standards are typically used for development at densities less than the mid-point of each zoning district range, whereas optional standards are utilised for development at densities above the midrange of each district, Further, the range of hosing types is also facilitated thrargh the implementation of the Terra Wsta, Wctorla, and Caryn Cowunity Plans, as standards cantal~md in these plans allot for further clustering of development as wll as same flexibility in setting 1nM use densities. ACTIDN: It is recommended then, that the City shevll continue to entourage the development of a mix of residential unit types without allowing one unit type to predominate to the detriment of the other. The continued i~leaamtation of the City's LaM Use Plan, Development Code, and Comaunity Dlans wil] enwre a wide range of residential unit types. As a rewlt, this • Drogra has been continued as Pragra 3.A.1 in the revised element. PR06RAI1 3.2 14intain and adainister a conda•tnium conversion ordinance which establishes a maxiaum smmat limit for the nu•ber of multi-family rental units that mqy be converted to arnership type. A condominium conversion ordinance becomes necessary in a market when the construction of new residential units, single-family and multi-family is reduced, whether as a result of national economic trends or a reduction to the amount of developable land, The conversion of existing rental apartments to condominiums for sale as ownership units reduces the stock of rental units, thereby resulting in a demand which exceeds the available supply. This in turn, can Lead to increased rental payments, A-131 DR.4F 1" FOR DISCUSSION PURPOGI=S QNLY To dale, only one project in the City has applied to convert from apartment to an ownership type of housing. In this particular case, the owner had • originally built the complex to condaninium standards and therefore did not require variances or significant changes to the project design to meet the necessary standards. Additionally, the owner had indicated that the purpose for processing the conversion was due to a high vacancy rate and the hope that the change would entice additional occupancy. It is not anticipated that a large number of apartment projects will attempt to convert in the near future. However, an interest Tn condaninium conversions may increase once the City approaches build-out or 1f the national economic climate changes significantly with Interest rates increasing dramatice7ly. ACTIgI: Therefore, in order to minimize the ia~ber of apartment units rhich could convert to candarinlums, thereby reducing the stock of affordable housing, the CTty should continue to ofntain its Conda•inium Conversion Ordinance and has been included as Program 3.B.I 1n the revised element. • OBJECTIVE 4: Promote energy efficiency 1n all residential developments. In addition to a monthly mortgage or rent payment, expenses incurred far energy and resa rtes consumed to the home are also major factors contributing to the overall housing cost. Implementation, of energy conservation measures may therefore help reduce the cost of housing in addition to helping conserve ever more precious natural resources. ACTIpI: Therefore, as attainment of this objective viii help contribute tovard the provision of affordable horsing for all unit types, it should be continued in the revised element. In addition to the programs currently used to laplement this objective, an additional program, 7.A.3, shall be added as a A-132 • DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOgES ONLY • means toward increasing the public's-~awreness and utilization of energy saving techniques. PR06RIY1 4.1 Enforce and regulate the energy design guidelines State Building Code. existing State residential through existing California The State of California estabiished basic energy efficiency standards for residential structures in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code which became effective June, 1983. These standards, which were updated in June, 1988, involve two basic requirements - the insta11aL1on of a 115t of mm~datory measures representing minimum conservation fea4ires and devices, and denonstration that the building's predicted annual energy use meets a designated energy budget for space heating and cooling and water heating. These requirements are uniformly enforced for all new residential • developments. ACTION: in compliance rith State lair and to msurc energy effitimcy this program shall be continued as Program 7.A.1 in the revised Nousing Element. PR06RAN 4.2 ]mplement through the Development Code energy efficient design proce8ires and specifiutians for suM things as solar techniques, landscaping standards, house orientation, and sun angle exposure. In addition to the provisions required as part of Title 24, the City has incorporated energy conservation standards and polities as part of the Municipal Code in Sections 17.08.040.M.1 and 2, and 17.08.O60.G. Neweve~s Although it has been found that the solar standards for site development, such as sun angle and house orientation may not be as important in maximizing solar A-133 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY efficiency as structural code requf rements and unit design. Hm+erer, the site • development standards ant policies should be maintained as thgy do contribute torard aMieving solar energy efficienq and encourage thoughtfulness in the site design early in the development process. ACTION: it is recommended then, that this program be cantimred as 7. A.2 1n the revised element. In addition to the do programs disassed prcvtously, the City has also utilized methods t0 encaurege resource canservatlan through the implementation of new standards and public lnformatiom efforts. In 1989, the City developed and adopted a Xeriscape Ordinance which requires reduced consumption of water in landscapes for all new camrercial, industrial, and multiple fawily residential developments. In addition, 7n 1987, the City developed model home landscape criteria which requires all new residential developments with Wore than 2 models to landscape one model entirely with water saving landscape and irrigation. Each 'water saving" model Host also contain identifying signage and displays describing the water saving techniques used. • ACTIpI: The City should continue to encourage energy conservation measures through public education programs and by encouraging other types of conservation techniques. Thercforc, program 7. A.3 has been Included in the revised element to ev~surc the continuation of public infarmstion efforts and the development of conservation teclsilgnes. O6IECTIYE 5: provide housing opportunities which meet the needs of households of law and moderate int~es and identify speetal needs gaups. A-134 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY _ The State legtslaiure i',as sated tnat "t~ne availability of housing is of vital statewide importance, and the early attaTnnient of decent houstng and a suitable living environment for every California family is a priority of the highest order." In order to achieve this goal, local ,jurisdictions should use all resources available to them to "fac9lTtate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community." As a result, much of the analysis contained in the Housing Element is concerned with Identifying the needs of lav and moderate income households as well as other special needs yrwy5, c. t".==^ °~^ *he arouos which typically have the most difficult time acquiring housing. A wr#eLy a# prywam were ews#Med ss a meatus 6eward aeM#ev#e~ ih#s eb}eat#ve and are d#saassed #n Beta#>• belewr ACTION: This obdective statement should be Included in the revised element, but broadened to inclyde the needs of all economic segaaemts of the co>unity, including special needs groups, to addition, several nor Programs Mve been added as a means of furthering the tagleaeritatian of this ab~ective and address the needs of mdlile hale parks aid special coeds populations as well as requiring imglsentatien of programs developed as pert of the Bedevelapment Agency's Affordable Messing Strategy. PA06PAM 5.1 Adinister and continue to develop Residential Mortgage Bond Progress whereby low interest loans can be issued to first time home buyers mud:ing at or helot 120 percent of the established median income level. - In 1983 adninister a mortgage allocation of E36.2 Million. - In 1984 apply for a mortgage allocation of 545.8 Million. A-135 DF2gFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - In 1965, and thereafter, apply for a mortgage allocation consistent with the developer and home buyer demand. • The minimum anticipated target, as stated in the 1984 Housing Element, was to provide law interest loans for 280 lox and moderate incase households. The City has exceeded this goal. Since 1983, the Redevelopment Agency and the City have issued over f150 Million in Mortgage Revenue Bonds and approximately 760 homes have been financed. These programs were used more in the first few years after 1983 when interest rates were higher and housing prices were lower. In recent years, the Drice of new housing in Poncho Cucamom~a has exceeded the allowable price limits of the programs. These limits arc detlrflned Dy HUD m a yearly hosts Mich include both lncoae and sales price. However, should the housing development industry modify their product type to meet these limits or express a need for this type of program, future issues could be sold. ACTION: The City shall continue to maintain and develop Residential Mortgage Mond Program which will be utilized Dosed upon dsand and market conditions. • This Aas been included as Program 5.A.1 in the revised housing eleaatnt. PR06RIM 5.2 TYrough the development approval process, the City shall consider the use of Multiple-Family Residential binds then requested, provided that 20 percent of the units arc to be cede available to hmseholds of for and awxlerate incomes. The City's Residential Bond Program, which is implemented through the County of San Bernardino, has assisted a total of 355 units since 1983, of which 271 units were financed in 1984 and 1985. This has exceeded the City's overall target of providing 151 units. As with the single family Mortgage Revemie Bond program, the use of the program depends on prevailing market conditions and developer wi111ngness to utilize the issues. • A-136 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY ACT30!!: As the residential bond program will continue to provide a viable source of financing for affordable rent:) Housing, the City shalt continue to promote this program, which has been Included as Program S.A.2. PR06RN1 5.3 Through the requirements of the Terra Wsta and Wcmria Ca~unity Plans, a maximum 15 percent density bonus shall be provided for the development of low and moderate inane hcusing in the following manner: for all units built under the bonus prbgru, one-third shall be for families mattng 100 to izu pen.a,: c° !'!~ arq median income, one-third of those making 80 to 100 percent of the median income, and one-third mating 50 to 80 percent of the median inco•e. Based on a study of the housing provided in Terra Yista since 1984, through May of 1990, a tots? of 1,519 units have been made affordable to low and • moderate income households, representing 52.7 percent of the constructed housing. To date, the amount of affordable housing provided has exceeded the anticipated goal of providing 15 percent affordable housing within this planned community. However, they have not met the goat of providing 1/3 of the units to each identified economic Segment as the maiori ty of the affordable units provided have been for those households whose incomes fall between the 80 and 1W percent of the median incgne 868 units (30.1 percent), 270 units (9.4 percent) and 391 units (13.2 percent) were provided to households at 50 to 80 percent of the median and to 100 to 120 percent of the median, respectively. While there has been periodic monitoring of Terra Vista, there has been no formal monitoring of the affordable housing provided in the Victoria Planned Community. Based on verbal information from the William Lyon Ca~any and knowledge of past selling prices, it is very likely Lhat a fair proportion of the hones sold Sn the first years of the Victoria's development were A-137 URgFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY affordabte. Howerer, unltAe Terra y!sta, the total number of units proposed for the Victoria Planned Community has actually been reduced from the 7,577 as originally planned to 6,271 units. This is a result of the fact that the 4YOn Campanry chose to develop a larger amount of lower density, single family product had been developed than was originally planned. Therefore, in order to determine the exact number and distribution of affordable units provided in both Terra Yista and Victoria, it will be necessary to develop a monitoring program which shwld be reviewed, on an annual basis. ACTIpI: It is recaamended that requirements of the Terra Wsta and nuber of affordable units to be pi require an annual rrriew of the affardabftity levels are being rt. Progrem S. A.3 in the revised eleamnt. the City continue to 1agleamM the Yittoria Community Plans regarding the nvided. In addiNan, the City should units provided to deteraHne whether These actions have been included as PROGRAM 5.4 • In cmformance with Section 65915 of the California Goverment Code, the Ci1;Y shall provide development incentives to an individual prgtect then 25 percent of the units art available to tom and moderate income households or special needs groups. The conditions of the incentives will be prescribed through the use of development agreements and are to be specific to the protect needs and characteristics. Such incentives mqy include: deferral, watver, ar reduction of fees, reduction of appropriate development starmdards, and density bonus. A-138 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES QNLY Provisions for tha allowance of a density benus have to the past been used in conjunction with the Senior Housing Overlay zone. Since 1984, 3 senior apartment projects have been approved in which an increase in density was provided as en incentive for development. In each case, projects were developed to the High Residential District (24-30 dwelling unfts per acre) and had approved densities of 34, 35.3 and 31.5 dwelling units per acre respectively. Typically, additional incentives were also allowed and usually involved reducing parking requirements, waiving fees, and direct subsidy, Recent amendments to State Law (A6 1259, 1989) have strengthened the ~2yui~~w,eu is for provision of incentives by cities to developers of affordable housing. The revised legislation no longer allays credit for provision of units for moderate income households, and requires that Incentives be provided tf: 20 percent of the units are reserved for lower income; or if 10 percent of the units are reserved for very low income; or if 50 percent are reserved for senior citizens. The bask provisions of the law require that cities grant a 25 percent density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowed density • and at least one other incentive; or, instead of the density bonus, provide other incentives of equivalent financial value. Additionally, the new legislation requires local jurisdictions to adopt an implementing ordinance to specify the method of providing developer incentives. As the City's current standards deal with the provision of density bonus in relation to senior housing, the development of an expanded density bonus ordinance has been added to the Planning Divisicn's 1990-91 work program. ACTIpI: Include a program for development of a density borws ordinance which shall occur by the end of 1991 or r1tMn 90 days of a project sWwitWl far use of density benus provisions, whichever Comes first. This action has been included in Program 5.A.4 of the revised element. ® A-139 PR06RN1 5.5 ~~~ rOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES Gr1LY • Encourage prlvat! developers to utilize rental assistance prograe to assist those groups in need as identified by the Housing Assistance Flan. Rental assistance 1s provided through the Federal Section 8 programs which are administered through the County Rousing Authority. There are several programs available including a certificate program, new construction and a scattered site voucher program. The total number of participants receiving assistance exceeds the goal amount of 145 participants (16 large families, 113 small families, and 16 elderly fami11es) stated in the 1984 Housing Element. As of January 31, 1990, a total of 278 participants were being assisted of which 150 were participants in the certificate program. In addition to the certificate program, there are 117 new construction units contained in the Moodhaven apartment complex and RUD owns 11 single family units in the City which are utilized as part of their Scattered Site Program. This program continues to be utilized to its maximal potential and in fact as • of January 31, 1990, the County Rousing Iuthority indicated that they had an additional 271 applicants on the waiting list to receive Section 8 assistance. ACTION: 1'he City shall continue to encourage the use of Section $ funding by private developers of rental projects with informational datrents regarding the availability of the Section 8 progra. 0lJECTIYE 6: Promote equal hosing opportunities for all economic segments of the caaalunity. A-140 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY • Pne purpose of this obJecttve is to provide information and affirmative support for the fair housing laws of the State and Federal governments 7n support of the goal of ensuring that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment. The programs developed in furtherance of this obJecttve promote efforts to eliminate discrimination in the sale and rentai of housing and to ensure that the rights of all parties are protecteA. ACTION: AS this ab3ective furthers the tapleaentatian of the City's Housing 6oa1 by propting housing opportunities for all econalc segsents of the comity it should be aaintalned, However, the oDJettive stataent should be expanded to iMiUte that equal housing opportunities should be provided regardless of age, sex, or reltgtan. PROGRlW 6.1 Provide financial wpport for Inland Mediation Board, or a similar non-profit fair housing organization, which assists in the rcsoluttan of tenant/landlard disputes and • housing discriaination. To promote fair housing the City contracts with the Inland Mediation Board. The board is a non-profit organization which helps citizens (both tenants and landlords) resolve housing disputes without the need for costly and time- consuming cart action. The Board also provides agrtgage default counseling, and assists with complaints regarding housing discrimination and refers cases to the District office of the DeparOaent of Fair Employment and Housing, and conducts workshops to inform the community of tenant/landlord rights and responsibilities under State and Federal laws with respect to fair housing. From July of 1984 to June 1989, Inland Mediation Board has handled a total of 1,296 inquiries. Of information provided since July of 1987, 54 of those calling were further counseled and 15 camp la tots of discrimination were filed. In the last four years the number of cases have increased annually by an average of 17.8 percent. to addition to counseling, the Board also A-141 FOR IJI5CUSS ONN PURPOSES ONLY provides public inforsation services concerning fair housing laws and available counseling. In fiscal year 1988-89, Inland Mediation Board held B • public workshops, 7 radio and television appearances, and conducted 3 training sessions with apartment managers. AS the rwm4er of eases have inew!ased ever the mast Eewr yearsT It is likely that the mater of eases will continue to increase aver the next five years and as a rewlt, wpport for this service should continue, ACTION: Continue to provide support for counseling services provided by Inland Ikdtatton to assist in the resolution of tenant/landlord disputes and housind dtserlNnari.~. --- -----. ••.s r, ,,yra^ is provided as 6.A1 in the revised element. !n addition to the counseling services described above, Inland Mediation also conducts a senior shared housing program. This program offers counseling to senior citizens to identify and evaluate housing options and has been in effect for three years. During that period, from July of 1985 to June of 1989, a total of 77 seniors have been counseled and 4 persons assisted with a match. The City plans to continue this prngram and wilt encourage Inland • Mediation to further promote Its availability. ACTIpI: Contlme to wpport Inland Mediation to their efforts to provide counseling services to seniors regarding hdusing options. This has been added as Program 5. E.2 of the rcHSed Nosing Eleaent. ORJECTIYE 7: Nhere possible, eliminate governmental constraints. State Law, Government Code Section 65583, requires that local Jurisdictions provide an analysis of "...potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, iayrovement, or development of housing for all income levels...", and where possible remove those constraints, The following programs were developed with the intent of limiting governmental constraints to the extent possible. A-142 • DRgFT FOR DISCUSSION PUf{ppgEg QN Y ACTION: Ii is importams that the Ciry_cantinue to ewluate and ~tt the • umecessary governsmntal constraints on housing development. Theroforo, this ob~ectt ve shall be canttnred sad several nei prograa5 added to further iepleamnt this obiective. These progress include the establishment of a revised fee structure, the provision of inforstional documents to applicants, and ewluation of the protessl~g time necessary for affordable restdentfal pro~ectS. PROGRAM 7.1 hsplement a computer fisnl analysis cysts rhich fdentiftes the fiscal impact of ns developments and rhlth suggests financing alternatives and methods for the identified costs. In 1983, the City of Rancho Cucamonga determined that it was necessary to prepare a financing plan that would evaluate the City's capability to provide public improvements and support future growth over the next 20 years and to determine possible financing alternatives. At the time the project began, high interest rates and a general slowdown Tn the U.S. economy were limiting the extent to which developaent fees alone could finance the schools, roads, parks, and drainage systems that would be required to support future growth. Nhen the report was finished, in late 1985, economic conditions had improved and the City had independently made significant progress in financing public improvements. Asa result, the large scale, citywide fiscal model has been supplanted by more specific area studies. These various area studies on Lhe fiscal impacts of development have included the development of several cosmunity plans, such as Terra Vfsta and Victoria, as well as the development of the Landscape and Lighting Districts and the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Master Plan. A-143 DRAF'T' TyQR DISCUSSION PURPOSE;g (~NL'f In addition, the City provides a comprehensive 'tsttng of the various fees • required for developmerct including Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning fees. This informmtim provides prospective applicants with the ability to make an accurate assessment of the cost of developing at the earliest stage of a project and thereby determine its feasibiiity. The City is currently in the process of conducting a fee analysis to determine if the current changes adequately cover a71 City services and necessary infrastructure improvements. This study should be cmpleted in late 199D 1991. ACTION: The City shall cmtinue to lmpleaent the various camunity, district, and mastar plans to help provide infor>•tim to City agencies and private applicants regarding the fiscal Sapacts of development. Additimally, a prograw should be added regarding the deretapmmt of a capreherrsive fee analysis. A 1lsting of these foes will then be provided to applicants in order that thq~ mqr amlce an accurate assessment of the cost of developing. These actims have been included as Progra 8. A.1 in the revised element. PROCRNI 7.2 The Redevelopaent Agency maY assl5t in providing incentives for residential projects, such as p;yment of building and development feet, provide infrcstructurc iaproraents and land cost write dons, Mere 25 percent or more of the units are avallaDle to low and moderate income households. To date, the Redevelopment Agency has provided direct incentives to one affordable housing project, the Heritage Park Apartments for Seniors. The Agency contributed approximately E80,000 toward the tort of improvements. Such uses of the 20 percent set aside funds are no longer allowed. However, a number of new programs are being examined for use by the Agency in expending the use of these funds. Under the terms of the Western Center Settlement Agreement, these funds may be used mly for direct benefit to housing units A-144 • DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURF'C`5ES ONLY of€ordabie to personslfamiiies of law or moderate intone. The Redevelopment . Agency is anticipated to adopt a Housing Set Astde Fund Vrogram Strategy during fiscal year 1990-91, and implement specific protects with direct participation. This wi11 provide for the release of approximately S6 million initially and f4 mi111on annually, thereafter, for tow intone housing protects. ACTION: In anticipation of coapletian of the Redevelop~ent Agency's Affordable Housing Strategy, three pragn6 have been added to the revised Housing Eleaent. Drogra S.A.7 requi-ed the devetop~ent and tiyieakntatian of the Affordable Housing Strategy, and Progn~ 8. A.3 requires the evaluation of the City's pro~ett processing prooMires io deter>.ine rhether shortened review tines ayy be possible for affordable developaNrts. Finally, Pragro 9.A.1 has been added rhich rewires the Housing Elsent to be revised to incorporate the progress developed as part of the Affordable Housing Strategy. Suaamry: Based on the above analysts, it has been determined that the existing 7 obtectlves will be continued and that the existing programs will either be continued, modified, or eliminated as discussed. New programs will be added as necessary to further assist in obtaining the goals and obi ecti ves identified in Chapter 2. Additionally, as a result of the needs assessoent evaluation 1n the Technical Appendi:, two new obtective statements will be added which relate to ensuring high quality and we11 functioning en vironnents and ensuring periodic review of the Housing Elements goa15, obtectives, policies, and programs. A-145 DRAFT FOR DIEiCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY . 6LDSSARV Affordability -the number of very law and lower intone households occupying units at a cost greater than 30 percent of household income. Average Persons Per Household - The total number of persons living in households in a locality divided by the total number of occupied units. Beautification Fee - A fee charged to developers for installation of landscaping and other aesthetic features by the City. Buildable Land - land which is capable of supporting physical structures. Build-Ott - The maxlmtm amount of development possible wTthln a given geographical area. Capture Rate - The oDDortunity to house locally generated employees within the City Limits. Constraints - Factors which prevent or inhibit the development of housing in the City. Council of Governments - The organization created pursuant to a ,joint exercise of powers agreement to undertake planning and whose membership is composed • solely of elected offitTals of local governments within the planning ,{urisdiction or their representatives and whTCh is recognized as the area wide planning agency by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Developable Land - Land which is physically capable of being developed for residential, commercial, or Tndustriai use. Development Densities - The number of housing units per acre. BU's - Dwelling units. Elderly - Persons 62 years of age or older. Fixed Market Costs - Development costs over which the City has no power or authority. Gross Acreage - The total number of acres of land which can be developed. Group Quarters - Persons in living arrangements other than households. Group quarters are located most frequently in Institutions, rooming houses, military barracks, college dormitories, fraternity and sorority houses, hospitals, monasteries and convents. Growth Potential - The availability of land for future urban development. r1 L I A-146 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Handicapped - Person; 6eteraitaad to have a physical impatrmert or merttzl • disorder which is expected to be of long-continued or Tndefinite duration and is of Such a nature that the person's ability to live independently could be improved by more suitable hwsing conditions. Hwsehold - All persons occupying a single dwelling unit. Housing Unit (or Lhit) - The placement of permanent or customary and usual abode of a person, Including a single-family dwelling, a single unit in a two- family dwelling, multi-family or multi-purpose dwelling, a unit of a condominium or cooperative housing project, a non-hwsekeep{ng unit, a mobile home, or any other residential unit which either is considered to be real property under State law or cannot oe moved wiinw i auu>ianLiui ~saya or unreasonable cost. Jobs-To-Housing Ratio - The proportion beMeen the number of jobs and housing units in a particular geographical area. A ratio greater than 1 in dilates more jobs than housing units in an area, or the potential for overcrrowding, long distance commuting, and a shortage of housing. Large Families - A family of 5 or more persons. Lower-Income Hwsehold - Household whose income, with adjustments for • household size, does not exceed 80 percent of the median hwsehold insane of the standard metropolitan statistical area (SMSA), ar outside 9iSA's, the cwnty, Marketability - The attractiveness and saleability of a hwsing unit. Market-Rate Hwseholds - Those households who, as determined by the allocating entity, have the finamcial capability to meet their hwsing needs withou*_ sacrificing other essential needs. Median Household Income - The amount which divides the distribution of annual hwsehold insane into two equal grwps, For famines and unrelated individuals, the median intone is based on the distribution of the total number of families and unrelated individuals, including those with no insane. Moderate-In cane Household - Household whose income, with adjustments for hwsehold size, is between 80 percent and 120 percent of the median household incase of the SMSA, or wtside SMSA's, the cwnty, A-147 DRAFT FOR DISGUSS(ON PURPOSES ONLY Needing kehabilitatian - A ha~sina unit wh?ch, i.^. its present state, materially endangers the health, safety or well being of its occupants in one or more respects, and which is ecmomitaliy feasible to repair. Needing Replacement - A dwelling unit which meets the above conditions, but is not economically feasible Lo repair. Net Acreage - The actual number of acres of buildable land, minus land for roads, sidewalks, parks, schools, open space and utilities. Non-Market Rate Households - Households who, as described by SCAG, do not have the financial capability to meet their housing need without sacrificing other essential needs. Off-Site Construction i.osis - ~:~'---"` .^~rc ahnve actual site preparation and building costs, such as sidewalks, utilities, landscaping, etc. Overcrowding - A housing condition where there is 1.01 or more persons per room. Purchasing Power - The level of purchases which can be made by individuals and households, usually defined as net (after tax) income. Rea{onal Housing Market Area - The geographical unit, established by the allocating entity (or the Southern California Governments), within which local • interaction has resulted in social and economic interdependence in the areas of housing, employment and service opportunities. Regional Statistical Area (RSA) - The geographical unit used by the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) planning division for compiling U,S. Census and other statistical data. SCAG ProJectiaas - The Southern California Association of Governments provides 1983 - 2000 growth pro3ections for population, housing, employment and land use for the southern California region in its SCAG 1983 Growth Forecast Policy/Development Guide, approved April 1983. These pro3eCLions are used by local governments for planning purposes. 9na11 Families - A family of four or less persons. SMSA - Acronym for Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. M area, which includes the Counties of San 6ernardino and Riverside and the City of Ontario, which is used for data collection by governmental agencies for such things as housing, population, employment, and income levels. A-148 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Speci a7 ",.¢ods ALLe.^.•_i e.^. .o the spq;ai needs of large fa~nil ie5, minort ty • households, the elderly, the handicapped, hame7ess, and persons displaced as a result of public activities, and others as the locality deems appropriate. Sphere-Of-Influence - The geographical area within which the City has the ability to affect development or growth. Suitability/Habitability - The number of households living in housing needing rehabititatlon or replacement. Underutilized Land - Land which is not presently developed to the fullest and best use possible under the General Plan designation. Upper Income Household - Household whose incase, with adjustments for nousenoid size, en~eew iE~ ya,~d,ii. v` ...~ :... SMSA, or outside SMSA's, the county. 4~ tow Income Household - Household whose income, with adiustment for household size, dues not exceed 50 percent of the median household incase of the SMSA, or outside SM5A's, the county. Weekly Absorption Rata - The number of housing units of a particular type or price which +s sold by realtors,in one week. I~ A-149