The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991/06/19 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL er~Nne as v~ ''' i~ L is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS lat and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 19, 1991 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Givic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 31730 stt City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Aleaander, Mayor ProTem Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Coancilmember Pamela J. Wright, CouncilmemGer •ss Jack Lam, Ctty Mam~er James L Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City OtSce: 989.1851 - Clty Council Agenda June 19, 1991 1 All iteaa aubmitlW for tae Citp Comeil Agmda wet ba io ~° writing. The deadliae Tor anbaitting then items Sa Bt0O p.m. on the Neduaadap prior to the Mating. The Citp Clerk's Office rnaiwa all meh items. #. CALL 1'O ORDBR 1. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexmder _, Stout _, Willima _, antl wr>gnt _. 8. ANNOUNCEN6RT8/PRBBBNTATIONB 1. Presentation of Proclamntio¢ to Chief Bnginear Donald D. Manning of the Los Angeles Fire Department for his Aeeistanca in the Development of our C.B. R.T. program. C. COINIDNIC#TIONB FROM T~ PUBLIC This is the ties and place for tae gmaral public to address thm Citp Comeil. State law prohibits tae Citp Comeil fmm addressing mp issue not previously included on tae #genda. Tha city Comoil may receive testimony wd set the matter for a aubaaqumt maati¢g. COYe¢ts are to be limned to five minutes par individwl. D. CONSBMP CALR7DAR The following Consent Calendar itme era •:petted to bs rosstine a¢d ¢on-controveraiel. Thep will ba acted upon by the Council at one Lisa without discussion. Any item map ba revved by a Covncilmember or member of tae audie¢ce foz discuaaio¢. 1. Approval of Minutes: Hay 22, 1991 2. Approval of Warrant e, Register Noe. 5/29/91 and 6/5/91; 1 and Payroll ending 5/23/91 for the total amount of $1,603,613.08. . 3. Approval to receive and file current Investnx+nt Schedule 9 ae of May 31, 1991. 4. Approval io authorize amending Piecal Year 1990/91 13 appropriations. - Cily Council Agenda Jutta 19, 1991 2 5. Alcoholle Beverage Application for Off Sale General, 14 Carla Liquos, Youbef Havers and Jamil Spmouh, 9677 Poothill Boulevard. ~.. 6. Alcoholle Savarage Application Eor Otf Sale Gerwral, 16 1990 Conditional Priority /35, Unnamed Businaea, Ghaxi D. Durghnll i, 7270 Victoria Paxk Lane. .. Aoaroval to authorics the annual levy of aeseasment lg adminietsstion coney.. f~: !~~ nnllactlon of aaaeeementa in the Altn Loma Channel District (E4-2~, cne o Street Industrial Park Refund Diatriat (82-1A) and the Rancho Cucamonga Dretnage District (86-2 ). RESOLUTION NO. 91-158 19 A RESOLUTION OF TER CITY COUNCIL OP TER CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THB LHVY OF AN ASSESSMEAT SURCRARGS FOR TIR SIPENSBS INCURRED IN TFR COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VAAI003 SPHCIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS B. Approval to find Ths Oevelopere Insuranue Company, 21 Surety Eor The earmakian Company, Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 13394, in default of Performance Hood Noe. 983230-5 and 983116-5 and authocisa the City Hnginaer to cause the street and storm drain improvements and appertain work covered by aaitl bonds to be completed and authorize the City Attorney to take action against The eacmekian company and Developers Insurance Company to recover alI costa incurred by the City, including any daaWgee resulting from the Developer's and/oz Surety's feiluze to caoply, in causing the improvements to be completed pursuant to the improvement agreement. 9. Approval to order the vacation of a poction of an alley 23 located weer of Malachite Avenve and south of Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 91-159 24 A A880LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFR CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OP AN ALLEY LOCATED WEST OF MALACHITH AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PAOff - City Council Agenda - June 19r 1991 3 10. Approval of Map and ordsrinq the Mnexation to Landscape 27 Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Meintanence District Nce. 1 end 2 for Pnresl Hap 13707, located at the northeast corner of Eighth Street and Baker Avenue, eubaitted by Michael Inveetment Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-160 Q$ A RESOLUTION 0I mNR Cimv Mf1aCTT. na mva CITY OF AANCNO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 13707 RESOLVTION NO. 91-161 29 A RESOLUTION OP TH6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDBRING TH6 ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING HAI NTENANCB DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOA PARCEL MAP 13707 11. Approval of Map and execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the Annexation to 31 Landscape Halntenance Dlatrict No. 4 and Street Ll9ht ing Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map 33825, located on the southeast corner of ease Line Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-1E2 33 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 13825, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SfiCUAITY RESOLUTION NO. 91-163 3Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL ZFORNiA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL HAP 13825 12. Approval to execute a Joint Uee Agreement (CO 91-034) 37 with Southern California Edison Company for relocation and inetallat ion of electrical transmission lines from a utility easement to a street easement on the east aide of Rochester Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard. City Council Agenda June 19, 1991 6 RESOLUTION N0. 91-166 38 ° A ABSOLUTION Ol THE CITY COUNCIL OP TMS CZTY OF AANCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SOINT USS AGAEBMENT WTTH SOUTHBRN CALIFORNIA SDISON COMPANY FOA ABLOCATZON OF OTILITIES AT ROCHESTER AVENUE ' AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 13. Approval to ezacuta agreement (CO 91-035) aith the 3y Pennhill Company allawinq construction of model hams complex for Tentative Tract 14866 prior to recordation of final subdivision map. 16. Approval to award and suthoriza execution of a contract 44 (CO 91-036) for the Rancho Cucamonga oral History Program, Phass I, to Mallon and Sueociates, for the Amount of $12,055.00, to ba funded by the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. 15. Approval of Library 8nhancement Services contract {m 46 91-037) between the county of San Bernardino and the city of Rancho Cucamonga to provide $25,000.00 for additional library earvlcee at the Rancho Cucamongv Branch Library for Fiscal Yeez 1990/91. To be funded Prom Account No. 01-4532-6028. 16. Approval of year two continuation of the Druq Abuse 50 Resistance education (OAAE) program through the execution of a Memorandum of Underatnnding (CO 90-090) between Alta Loma, Central and Stiwartda School Districts, the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, and the City of Rancho Cucamenga and the allocation of $44,552.00 to cover the City's portion of the program's budget. 17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 52 Tract 13279, located an the south Bide Of highland Avenue between Rochester Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company. ABSOLUTION N0. 91-165 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRHEMBNT E%TENSIOB ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13279 ,4 4 - City Council Agenda JuM 19, 1991 5 18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Bxtendon !or 56 ~` Tract 13280 Landscape, located on the north •tde of Flaee Lines Road between Nilllken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, submitted by The William Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-166 69 A ABSOLUTION OF TB8 CITY COUNCIL OP TER CITY OB AANCFIO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVZNG IMPROVBlRNT AGREBN&iT B%TAEeION AND INPAOVEMBNT 86CUAITY TOA TRACF 13280 LANDSCAPB 19. Approval to execute Improvement AgreemenC Bxteneion YoY 6U Tract 13281 Landscapes, locaNd on the northwet wrner of Baee Lines Rcad and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Tha WS111am Lyon Company. RESDLUxlon No. 91-167 63 A RESOLUTION OF TRH CITY COUNCIL OF TBH CITY OY AANCEEO COCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRSEMBNT BITSNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POA TRACT 13281 LANDSCAPE 20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 64 Tract 13359, located on the east aide of Sapphire Street between Orchard Street and Jennet Street, submitted by X.K. Xeim, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 91-165 66 A RESOLUTION OF TFR CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVF.M$NT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOA TRACT 13359 2]. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 67 Tract 13565-5 thru -30 Streets and Tract 13565-5 thru - 10 Landscape, located on the northeast cazner of Smmoit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Stnndard Pacific o£ Orange County. ~'a V ~ Clty Council Agenda June 19, 1991 5 RESOLUTION NO. 91-169 ~ 10 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVSNENT AGREE!ffiNT HXTENSION AND IHPROVHNENT SECURITY POR TRACT 13565 STREETS AND TRACE 13565 LANDSCAPE 22. Approval t0 execute Improvement AOr0emant Extension fnr• 71 OR tl7-48, located on the south side of 9th Street betw0an Rellmm Avenue and Archibald Avenu®, aubmitt0d by Sebaatiano Pilpi. RESOLUTION NO. 93-170 73 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OP R11NCN0 CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVHtQNT AGR88MBNT HXTHNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR DR 57-48 23. Approval to exeout0 Improvement Agre0m0nt Extension for 74 Parcel Map 10185 located on the southwest eczner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenuer submitted by The williaco Lyon Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-171 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POA PARCEL MAP 10185 24. Approval to accept Improvements, Releaae of Bonds and 78 Notice of Completion for the Storm Drein and Rough Grading of Milliken Park located on th0 east side of Milliken Avenue between church Street and Mountain View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $386,772.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-1'/2 7g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TFH': CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH8 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN AND ROUGH GRADING OP MILLIREN PARR AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOAR ' City Council Agenda June 19, 1991 ~! 7 25. Approval to zelease the Improvement Bonda fot Tract 80 r 13442 Aanyon Perk Project. Release: Faithful Performance Bond $560,000.00 Labor and Material Bond $280,000.00 26. Approval to release Haintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract $1 12914. located on Ehe northeast cnrnar of Archibeltl Avenue and Bighland Avenue. Release: Nnintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600.00 27. Approval to rsleaee Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 82 12944, located on Terrace View Loop at Nt. San Antonio Street and Copper Paas Coutt. Release: Maintenance Cuerantae Bond (9treat) 5 13,500.00 28. Approval to releaae Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract fl3 13342, located on the east Bide of Hermoefl Avenue between 19th Street and Pinch Avenue. Aelenee Streets: Haintenance Guarantee Bond $ 47,600.00 Release Private St teat e: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 5 17,600.00 29. Approval to releaae Maintenance Guarantee Bond far Tract 84 13558, located on Slerza Greet VSew Loop at Mt. Gunnison Court and White Mountain Court. Release: Haintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 14,500.00 B. CONSNNT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances bave had public heariaga at the tine of first reading. Second rsadiaga ars expected Lo be routine and non-coatzoversial. Thep will ba acted upon by the Comeil at one ties without discuaaioa. The City Clark rill read the title. Aay itee can be reeovad for discuaaioa. No Items Submitted. - Clty Council Agenda s June 19, 1991 8 P. ADVHHTIBHD PUBLIC ~ARINOB r The Sollowing itus have 6aea adveslisW and/or posted as public huriage as required by law. The Chair will opsa the acting to reoeive public bslieaap. 1. CONSIDERATION OP RBCRBATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING AND $S HTDRAGB - Review of current City requlatione affecting gtorwrn tnA .Yln n! nom.-~o.H nn.l vo6l nlne n .-l e~~n residential properties. 2. ODNSIDERIITION OP SNVIRONlDINTAL ASSHSSNHNT AND INDUSTRIAL ~PHCIFIC PL>•u 1twSND1lENT 91-03 - CITY OP AiNCF10 CUCA~F?NGA SE$ - A request to amend the Industrial Area Specific Plsn to arxlify the 8xtensivs Impart Coamercial use and to ada the indoor Nholeaals/Retail Coaelarcial Usa and its related developawnt criteria within the SpeeiElc Plan azea. Staff recommends Lsevanca of a Negative Declaration. ORDINANCE NO. 648 (first reading) 15] AR ORDINANCE OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, BSTABLISNING AHCULATZONS POR TH6 INDOOR WHOLESALE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL USE, NODI FYZNG TMS DEPINITION OP EXTENSIVE IEPACT COY~RCIAL USE, AND :UIRI::G FZ27D TAGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 3. CONSIDERATION OP ANNUAL REFUSE RATES 161 RESOLUTION NO. 91-173 164 A RESOLUTION OP TN8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING RATES POR ABSIDENTIAL AND COHMEACIAL/INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTING WITHIN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA O. PUBLIC HBNlINOS The tollowiag iteae have no legal publication oz poatiag rsquirgeata. The Chair will open the aaeting to receive public teatimoep. No Items Submitted. P - City Counoil Agenda June 39, 1991 9 s. clxr ipaDiasa~a aTAn RaPOxr3 The following itw m not legellT require anp public tesiieoap, although the Chair sap open the eeetlag !or public input. 1. CONSIDEMTION TO ACCEPT IMPAOVElgNTS FOA STORM DAMN 168 ONLY. RELBA38 OF B0ND6 AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION. Tab mne4 n_OaT4 V1C OOT_1T T4 M4.1iMIyltM1 VTTtl Te111~ 10O1n - ALNOND INTERCEPT CHANNEL. LOCATED ON TIDR NOATaNEST Relenae: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $587,400.00 Accept: Neinienance Guarantee Hond (Strout) $ 58,700.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-154 169 A RESOLUTION OF Tab CITY COUNCIL OP TFIE CITY OP PAACRO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTIRG TNB STORM DRAIN IMPA0VBlD3MT5 POR Tf0; ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANNSL AND AUTHORIZING TFIB FILING OF A NOTICE OF COHPI.ETION POR THE WORR 2. O V G V M OU H 17O COAST AZR CUALITY MANAGEMENT DZSTRI CT fSCAO.M01 ORDINANCE NO. 449 (first reading) 171 AN ORDINANCE OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP TF18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MOBILH SOURCB AIR POLLUTION RBOUCTION PROGPAH I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following iteea bsve heap requested by the Citp Comcil for diacusaion. Thep are not public hearing Sips, although the chair up open the esetiag for public input. No Items Submitted. r - City Council Agenda Jun• 19, 1991 10 yT. IDmfflfIC-TIOM OT YTEMB TOR MELT IRCl1N0 Thin is tb• ii•• fos Citq Couaoil to id••tifq th• itau thq F risk to discu•a a! th• azt wring. Thew itns will ut h• diacu•s•d •! this ...ring, onlq id•atlfi•d for th• a•rt u•ting. x. cowDtetlcxsfoRe neoN Tes Pvm.ic Tbia is th• !i•• and plow for th• gan•r~l public to addr•Ia !b• citq Council. 8tat• lar prohibits tba Citq Cotmcil frost addr•ssia9 •aq iuu• sot praeiouslq iaclnded oa th• Ag•nd•. Th• citq comcil uq m•i.• tutiaoaq and a.t the ~•tt•r for a aubsaquut uetiaq. Cottr•nL •n to D. 1Lit•d to f1v atinutaa p.r iadividual. L. AWOHRRI@Mf /RETIN6 TO ADJOOWI TO 8I8COTIV6 6668ION TO DISfAeB PER80NNII. NATTERS. BIECOTIV6 S888ION TO ADJODRN TO BPBCIAL MEBTINO ON JDLY 1, 1993 AT 5:30 P. M. IM TEH CoVNCIL CHAIBERB To ADOPT THE 1991/92 PI SCAL MBAR BUWBT. I, oebra J. Adams, City Clerk of the city of Honcho Cucaawnga, hereby certify that a trve, accurate ropy of the foregoing agenda was meted on June 16, 1991, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 22, 1991 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAYANGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 8diourned Joint Neetinc Clty Council nd NL t ric Preser ati n Canm}seion An atljourned joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City COUnC11 and Historic Preservation Comsieeion was held on Wednesday, Nay 22, 1991, in the Reins Room of the Clvlc Center, located et 10500 Civic Cuter Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p. m, by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembars: wll}iam J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Wil Name, Pamela S. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. stout. Present were Comoiaeionera: Neiicent Arner, Marsha eanke, eugene Billings (err ived 7:20 p.m.), Steven Preston, and Chair Bob Scluoidt. Abe¢nt were Commissioners: Ada Cooper and Alan Haekvit z. ASeo present ware: Jack Lam, City Manager) Brad Buller, City Planner: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner) Anthea Nartig, Associate P}eons-) Sigmund Dellhima, Management Analyst II7 Tarzy Smith, Park Planning/Develo~:.cent Superintendent; end Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. ~ • • + ~ . H. CITY COUNCIL CONSRfl CALBNDAR H1. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and TI, for the proposed Haven Avenue, Westeide Parkway Beautification Project - Deer Creek Channel, to Highland Avenue and approval of Resolution and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. RESOLVTION NO. 91-134 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVINO TH6 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND IESUANCB OP A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION POR THS PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE WESTSIDE PARKWAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT - DEER CREEK CHANNEL TO HIGHLAND AVENVE city Council/Historic Preesrvation Cocaci aaicr. Hinulna Hay 22, 1991 Page 2 MOTION: Novel by Alexandwr, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar. r Notion carried unanimously, 5-O. ! • R • f C. JOINT ITEN9 OF DISCUSSION Mayor Stout stated this meeting was one in a continuing series between Che Council and the Commieeione and various agencies to enhenoe communication, and he stated items that ware on thw an,.nd. ..b.o ..... ...___ _o - ac....-. ..e taken, other than possible direction on the part of the^COUncil roe Caasuieeian. C1. DISCUSSION RSGAADING BSTABLIBINRNT OF A HBRITACB PARR FOR PIACBMBNT OF PI$TOAIC HONBB Councilmember Will isms stated she had this item placed on the agenda because Lhie had been considered at one point, and she was wondering what the statue was on that idea, especially after the problems they just had with the Ledig House. conenieeionar Arner stated the Commission hoe discussed this recently, about saving and moving houses, and then selling them. councilmerober Wright stated that you would need a piece of property in order to do that, and though the Council discussed several ooeeible locations in the past, moat of those locations have now been developed. Commissioner Banks eiatad she needed clarification ae to what to discuss, because a heritage park could be set up in three different ways. One way would be to move the houses, develop them commercially, then sell them, which allows the public access to the houses since they are being used commercially. Another way would be if it was developed into a museum complex, but did not feel that was financially feasible in this community. The last way would be to move them into an area where they could be resold and maintained privately. She felt that was more like their land bank program, ae opposed to a heritage park. She asked if there was a direction the council was interested in. councilmember will iame stated she was interested in what the Commission was doing. Commissioner Banks stated that after a joint meeting held with the Planning Commission, they decided to pursue the land bank idea, an idea of buying the land and moving the houses to that, and not necessarily all right next to each other, but in clo ee proximity. councilmember Wright thought another use would be to place a house in a park, restore it and dsyelop SC to be a centerpiece of that park, and use it as part of the recreational activit iee. commissioner Banks stated that had been the original intention of the Ledig House, to move it to Arrow Route and let the City use it. City Council/Nletorie Pxeaervatlon Coma1691on Hi..^.utem May $2, 1991 Page 3 Councilmember Buquet stated there were coat coneiderat ions Sn moving a structure,,,! and though there era times when you have to realize the importance of the structure, sometimes those coat coneiderntione were a main factor. He felt if they did not set a goal now, and try to designate an area ae a heritage park, they will not have that opportunity in the future. He also felt they ditl not have the resources currently to eat up a heritage perk, nor did he feel the museum concept was viable. Commissioner Preston stated doing historic preservation was difficult in that it was not perceived ae everyone's desire. He thoucht St was thw fpwl+.... ..s ..e cunmieeaon rnat preservation works beet when it was economicaily producilve, and the more that heritage parka are built as museum pieoee, the less you are able to Lntegrats preservation as a movement into the larger goals of the community. Councilmember august stated they have had to be careful in the past to avoid people coming and threatening to force the city to purchase a house or It would be moved off-site to allow for development. He felt they needed to increase the incentives for property owners to do the restoration of the buildings, et lamer the facade, and maybe a staged process for restoring the inside. Conmieeioner Banks felt Rancho Cucamonga was on the cutting edge as far as offering incept ivea. She also felt the Commission had a lenient art Ltude towards adaptive re-use. She felt they needed to educate the community on the incentives that are in place, and the Commission hoe formed a community outreach committee In order to facilitate that education. Cauncilmemher Alexander asked how they go about designating something ae an historic landmark. Commissioner Banks stated they are trying to only consider sites at the applicant's !aquae!, ae opposed to picking out what they considered etgnificnnt places because they were meeting too much owner reaietance. she felt they were et ill having a lot coming before them due to the development in the City. Commissioner Preston stated they usually try to get the major issues decided in one evening, and two at the moat. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated there were about a half dozen homes that are clearly threatened, or will be threatened, by development. Councilmember Wright asked if they had any type of long range master plan that addressed ideas such ae using a certain number of homes for a heritage park, or in a park Bite, or for rejuvenating an area such ae Amethyst in Old Alta Loma and ue ing those restored houses for commercial uaee. Commissioner Banks fell. they had two long range plane, one was studying Old Alta Loma ae an Historic District, which would have a lot of design criteria and redevelopment possibilities, in addition to if there was a vacant piece of land, being able to move something onto it, and secondly the land bank program. She City Council/xistoric Pruervation Commission Minurea May 22, 1991 Page 4 etated the problem 1a that they have had a Blow start on the land bank program, ~,. end they need to be out acquiring land for the program, than it will ba in place when they have a threatened atructura. She etated the only etructura that hoe been able to ut ilixe that program eo far waa the Ledig Mouse. Councilmember Buquet etated in retrospect they should have made It a condition of approval that the developer move the Ledig Houee to the other Bite. He felt they have learned from that experience and could be more aware in the future of eimiiar aituatione. He also felt Lnetead of having ell the structures located st the acme amt, thw aheuld bw in nreximily to their orietnsl locations. Hayor stout etated their were two things they learned from the Lediq Houee experience, one was that they ovsreetimated the commercial value of the etructura, and the second one was that moving it any distance from the original Bite would be very coat ly and possibly cause damage to the atructura. Commiesianer Preston etated n few months ago they talked abou4 reviewing what was available and trying to prioritize their importance, and etated staff hoe generated a current work program which ie divided into several categories, ouch ae every day reeks, what could be done with available staff, and things they would like to explore but would need to find a funding mechanism to handle. He etated that program was outlined but they have it on hold pending the City's budget review. He also felt that with the next Ceneral Plan revision they should set up a historical preservation or cultural resource management element of the Plan. Hayor Stout asked if they woultl have to wait for the end of a cycle, couldn't they revise it prior to the next review which would be in approximately four years. Brad sailer, City Planner, etated they could adopt that element prior to the whole General Plan review cycle. Councilmember august etated ha would be supportive of having something adopted into the General Plan so that it could be conatdered when a development comae in for processing. • R • • • f C2. DISCUSSION OF OUINCENTENN IAL CELE aRATION Chair Schmidt felt they should commemorate the Columbus celebration, maybe elnnted more towards the mingling of the the European, Native American and African culture e; progress in mathematics, geography, and navigation; and moat importantly agricultural. He etated they were working on reviewing what has been developed by various government agenciaer and when they have all the information collected and reviewed, they woultl report on it further to the Council. Mayor Stout asked if they had any type of formal proposal for the Council formulated yet. City Council/Aiatoric Pzaaervatlon Con~iaeioa Ninutea Nay 22, 1991 Pages 5 Chair Hchmidt stated ha would lilu to commemorate it •imilsr to what tMy have i done in the pant, and that ha was going to chock with the Chaa,ber of Commerce to see if they were going to work Lt in next year in any way. He asked the Council what length of time they would be Lntezeated in conducting the celebration for. Conaeneue moos for a short celebration. • • • • ~ C3. OIHCUeNTON OR ARCNTVRR PRMRAw Cammiealonar Arnar stated one of tMlr concerns wsa that now shay have a location for the archives, that' did not know how it mould M etefEW. Hha etstad one of their original ideas would be to have an intern from a university. They have had a manual developed by n professional archivlet, but still needed to decide things like would there be an archive room that was open to the public, who would staff it, if there would be a trained person to work with volunteers, and someone to advise what should or should not be in the archives. Councilmember Will iame asked if there would be any grants available twat would pay for staffing. Anthea Hartiq, Associate Planner, state0 nrehival grants are very hard to came by. Counci lniember Williams felt this would qualify ae a library program, and thus would be qualified for acme library grants also. Councilmamber Buquet stated they could look for sponsorship Erom a local company to offset the coat e. He stated they would need Lo prepare a proposal to take to the companies outlining whet their needs were end the costa involved. Councilmember williame asked how much would it coat for staffing. commissioner soaks stated currently they were planning on eiaffing the facility only half time, eo approximately $10,000.00 per year. Councilmamber august felt that would ba a reasonable amount to obtain, possibly with joint sponsorship. Jack Lam, City Manager, asked if this would be something where an Intern could come in and set up the program, and then have it taken over by volunteers. Councilmember Buquet stated they could possibly set up an ongeing internship in conjunction with U.C. Riverside. City Council/distorts Praaervation Conciaaton Minutwa Msy 22, 1991 Page 6 Mayor Stout stated they might want to otter acme type of stipend for the intern, ~„ especially working with graduate students, because they would usually bo looking for a sophisticated setting to learn ea much ee they possibly could, and felt the City~a program was not to that point yet. He also stated that Target Btores was interested in specific programs for grant purposes, and thought the Commission should contact them to fund the archive program. Hnyor Stout stated they might want to start a program of !eking same of the documents in the nrchlves to various schools in the community, a travelling exhibit of sort e, to increase lhelr awarevow. nF ~,.~.~ e~..,,... documents were assets, and should not W kept in a basement room all`the time. Commissioner Janke stated with their outreach eubcaaxaittee they were trying to have an Smpact on the school system, and could incorporate both long and short range history. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, stated they have looked at duplicating a lot of information that ie in the archives and having a history center in the library at Central Park, in edditlon to their outreach program. The Council discussed the pros and cone of saving the original documents from the archive area for exhib It e. C4. DISCUSSION OF OAAL HISTORY pR -RAN AND HISTORY CENTER Commissioner Banks stated when this was first discussed, the Council felt Lhie was a priority item. She stated they have had a slow start, what with a change in personnel, going through the interview process and lining ep the funfling, but was concerned that with the current butlgetary conetrainte funding for the program would be cut. She was looking for confirmation that the Council was et ill committed to this program. Councilmember Wright asked if they have collected any recordings yet. Commissioner Banks stated they have done none yet. Anthea Hert iq, Associate Planner, stated they have been working on the contract with Knox Mellon, who waa the State Historic Preservation Officer for many years, and once they have all the legal requirements worked out, they can proceed immediately. she stated that some of the information collected on various prof acre has been oral and has been recorded and filed, along with work on the old Alta Loma area, but that has been done on a staff level. Once they have the contract worked out, then they will get the approval of the Community Poundntion for the release of !ands. Councilmembar Wrlght asked if they have looked into a national grant source tar funding. City Council/MiatoriC PraNrvation Cemmip Sen Minute May 22, 1991 Page 7 Anthee Hertig, Aeeeciate Planner, atated there are some grants avnilable through the state, that range from $1,000.00 io $1,500.00, but they receive many r requests. She etnted there era not a lot of funding aourcea available for local projects. she atated one year's budget would be $12,000.00, which would cover twelve interviews. She atated another creative funding avenue they have taken ie having development mit igntion fund oral histories when appl Lcabla. Councilmambar Buquet felt that whenever there was a grant opportunity suet labia, staff or the Commission should purees it, within reason of course. He fall they needed to look for Loeal aourcea for funding and create their own financial program. Brad Buller, City Planner, atated they were trying to work out a unit coat eo that could approach sponsorship at fllfferent levels. Councilmember Buquet felt they needed to set up n full range of funding, from corporate levels down to unit costa for interviews, and if that amount wan significant, splitting it down somehow. He thought once ii was started people will be interested and will financially participate to be involved in that history. He atated he would like to see them get creative because traditional funding aourcea are not available anymore. Couneilmember Wright atated there seemed to be a perception that the Council was not ready to fund the program, when she felt they were saying let's work together to find funding, maybe for the Cummieeion to work on some proposals and then when they have some ideas, bring it to the council so they can help identify the funding aourcea. She did not want the Commission to be eo concerned about funding that they would not present worthwhile ideas to the Council because they thought there be ineuff icient funds available. Councilmember Buquet atated he would like a follow-up on chin from etaif or 'the Commission in ninety days. Commissioner Arner atated they touched on the topic of a history center when they were speaking about the archive program. She atated there ate a lot of residents that have things they would donate to a history center if they coultl bs assured that they would be safe and not distributed into the community. Councilmember Wright atated the current plane for the library include a history room, but it will depend on the funding that is received and how the construction of the building ie conducted. Commies inner Arn¢r felt there were a lot of people who felt it was not safe to give things to libraries. She atated that libraries aha has visited that hatl succaeeful history programs had a separate room thaC was staffed, and the materials inside did not ever leave the facilities. Commissioner Preston asked if the library wculd ever be run 6y the City ae opposed to the County. city Council/Biatoric praaervation Cpamlc slot. Hlnu[es MaY 22, 1991 Page S Jack Lem, City Manager, stated that would hinge on what occurs with the library funding, and the ndminiatxation of the library tax funding. He stated they era defining the master plan ae to what the community needs, and looking at contingency plane if they sre not auceeeaful in receiving a geant. ^' Councilmember tiilliame orated one of the teaks of the library consultant ie to datermina the legnl documents needed to transfer operation of the library from the County to the City, if that need arises, • f t R 1 C5. DISCUSSION OF BVDGST A. Funding praaervation praisers - qo king with as Red alp~nt a e~ acts iris Lthig the 8gq cv b2gnda lee Commissioner Preston stated the Commission wee aware of the budget problems facing all cities this year, and though they unaeretana the large budget decieione are things only Che Council hoe the right to make, they have discussed in the Conmi¢eion programs they would like to initiate. In order to secomplieh those plane, though, they would need additional staff. Ae the Commission understood it, at this tine the funding for the hiatorlc preeervat ion program wan drawn entirely from the General Fund, but they have discussed using the Redevelopment Agency to a greater extent in a couple of different ways. The f iret way would be that there are many cease where the decieione on preeervat ion are decieione that enable flevalopment to proceed, eo in some cases a staff planner working on the project could have that time funded by the Agency ae opposed to rho General Fund. The second way would be if a developer approached the Agency at n sleeting and stated they die net agxe¢ with proposed historic preeervat ion on a project, and they were wondering if the Agency would ba interested in approaching the praaervation-redevelopmatt! link in a way that the preeorvat ion de ale are turned ae part of the deal points in an owner participation or disposition and development agreement. Jack Lam, City Hanager, stated they Agency hoe $50,000.00 in the land bank orogram, b¢cauee it was felt that program was related to the purposes of redevelopment. He stated that if projects were done in the redevelopment area, there might be funding available, but they could not necessarily go outside of that area, and cautioned about marginal projects. Councilmember Buquet stated they were just trying to express that Che et ate was reviewing all uses of redevelopment funds because they wanted to be able to conf Tecate that money if used improperlyr so they wanted to be careful projects were done properly. City Council/Historic Praaarvation Camiasior. Hinutsc May 22, 1991 Page 9 Commissioner Preston stated ha was only talking about redevelopment projacts,~, things that would 6e benefitting the redevelopment of the community, ao did rot feel that would be a problem. He stated that historic preservation is a permitted activity of Agency Eunde, ao he just wanted the Council to keep that funding source in mind. Commissioner Banks stated that in regards to the lnnd bnnking program, she felt moat of the Commission was not pleased with the protean the l.edig Houea want through, that the house was not secured properly to avoid vandalism once the last arnern mavM n..~ Councilmember august agreed that they needed to develop a procedure Eor maintaining property, to ensure that proper caretaking was maintained for the properties ae they got into the land banking program. x • • • • x C6. DISCUSSION OP EGbNOMIC DEVBLOPMSNT YEASDS PRESERVATSON Commissioner Preston etnted that the Commission hoe talked about when there ie a case where they cannot balance the goals of preservation with the developer, how would the Council like the Commieaian to handle it. Would they want the Commission to just look at the historical impact excluding all econamlc factors that may came into play when making their recommendation, then send it up to the Council, oY should they approach the projects with the awareness that in order to make a project move, they should shorten their list of interests to pursue and try to present to the Council something that already presents a compromise or reduction in requirement. Councilmember Auquet felt it was a matter of camman sense. Commissioner Banks dteagreed, et sting she did not feel they were qualified to judge a project on monetary constraints, that the Commission should just look et the historical merit o£ a project. Councilmember Buquet et ated he thought the Commission should be able to take an approach that balanced as much of the variables ae possible. The Council and Commission discussed various projects from the last year and considerations that might have been made at the Commission level. Hayor Stout stated he felt the Commiae ion should be helping the Council to analyze why eomsthing was historically eignif scant, making a recommendation of some sort ae to what can be done to make it work, but as far ae the economics of a project, he felt the Council was who ultimately made that decision. Ha stated he did not want the Conm~iseion compraoieing a situation to where he could not tell why they made their decision and what was important. City Council/Historic Preservation Ccm6ltaica Xirutas May 22, 1991 Page 10 Couneilmamber Wright stated she talt that with all the Cpmlaalons when they were reviewing n project, they wra looking at it with the CLty'e Lntersst Ln mind, not neceeearlly the developer's interest in mind, and that would be the aspect she would lilw this Casmiasion to tnke when reviewing a project. she stated they could eonelder all of the aepecta, including the economical, in the report, but the determination should have to do with whether or not there was historical elgnificance. if tttt ___ ____._~~ ay.:L: ~.... ...~ .weuuy . owi y.m. tH1H, Commissioner Banks stated aha fait that is how the Commission hoe been making their decisions, but they were looking for direction if that was how the Council wanted deciaione made eo that when it goes before Council it will be understood the context the decision wan made in. Mayor Stout felt economic considerations were a different issue, and should bo handled nt the Council level, that the CommLeeion should focus on the historical aspects with a solid recommendation, eo the Council could work out a compromise with the developer. He felt the City had a strong conmitment when it waa felt that something wee historically eigniflcnnt, and presented information on the Virginia Dare Winery project es an example where they placed historical significance over economic considerations. Commissioner Preston presented information on how the Commission can go about getting documentation on a structure for their historical files without necessarily having Co permanently preserve that structure and delaying or changing an economically sound development. • t b f b Y C7. AFFIRHATION GP SUPPORx FROM CITY COUNCIL ON DRVELOP R PONDER STL I Commissioner Banks stated that in the last six months or eo, the Commission hoe come up with some innovative ways to fund etudiea and restoration. She stated this was something new for them to be doing and the developers are not used to hietorle preservation being a mitigation practice, and they were looking for affirmation from the Council that this was the direction they want the Commiaeicn taking because it could be controversial in the brtginning. CR. D;SCUSSION OF ROUTE 30 ISSUES tMR1t• Commissioner Preston left the meeting at 8:55 p.m. R RR tRf City Council /Rleteric Preaetvet ion Cammiu ion Minutes May Z2, 1991 Page 11 Commissioner Benke eteted they are the only Commission that praesntly has ate. subcommittee looking at Route 30 in detail. She stated they are looking et the draft HIR, which ie still confidential, they are videotaping the route, they are walking the route and looking at ovary structure and the vegetation. she stated she was concerned about the process that would occur when they can develop proposals once the HZA wee released. Ii wne her understanding Chat whatever report the Commission develops would go thcough the Planning Commission first, end she was concerned that their report would be watered down when given to the Council. Nayor stout stated Ae has not ever seen that happen. Ns stated if the Historic Preservation Commission has sn opinton on something, the Planning staff has always included a section in the report that addreaaea their concerns, without a position being taken by the Planning Comsieeion. He stated the report the Council will eaa will include opinions from both bodies for the Connell to review. Commissioner Benke eteted they would probably be acme strong statements from the Mietoric Preeervat ion Cnmmiaaion, and felt they hnd a real opportunity to hove some et ate funded preservation in coniunct ion with Route 30. Councilmember Wright stated she would like the Commiealon to identify things that will be problems and list suggestions on what needs to 6e done to mitigate against those problems. Commissioner Benke stated they are taking stops in that direction, and have Eound the reeponae from the state to bs excellent on this mattes. ttayor Stout stated another issue to address Le that Aancho Cucamonga ie not the aeprov ing authority for P,oute 30, that SaHB.1G is the agency thnt hoe jurisdiction, with input from Coltrane and the federal transportation people. He stated that when dealing with these groups, Rancho Cucamonga would be an ineiynificart geographical location to them. He felt to impress them with the importance of the issues, it would have to be presented in a very logical and precise manner, or they will ignore preservation issues and deal with other things flrat. Councilmember Wright stated if there waa a structure in the way that needed to be preserved, the City would have to be reeponeible in easing that was done, and not rely on other agencies to do that. Commissioner Banks eteted they have euggaeted the state purchase a piece of property where they could relocate a threatened structure of significance, then they could sell it. That way the et ate would be fronting the money instead of the City. Commissioner Billings stated that Coltrane hoe done a tremendous amount of preliminary work, and felt that Coltrane was going to be cooperative in this matter. Clty Council/Historic Preservation Conmiwelon Ninutea Nay 22, 1991 Page 12 • ~ + . . ~ C9. DISC^JSSION OP IT M OP N T CON 8 H Hayor stout fait they needed to keep in mind that what was being done today would be historically significant in the future. He stated he would like the Commission to suggest any idene they might have to the Council on what they should be doing today if that was possible. Commiwwloww. a.ner sou _ __ -_ r~~a~l toY LCal ly ` wi,a~ wools oo nLa eignlflcant in the future, but they could be aura to document whet happne today to be available to future generations. Councilmembsr Wright thought that Route 66 was an example of recent history that happened inadvertently. You can tall that people did not give it any significance, it was just a way to get somewhere, but now it ie considered in a nostalgic way and people ore trying to preserve it. She felt you could not do something with the intention that it was for history, you could only document what was done because the pees inq of time would determine what will ba significant. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, thought possibly what the Hayor was expressing would be something like what the City of Fullerton did with their transportation center, where they took what was basically a alum area and vacant lots, and over the last ten years they have bought the train station, built a parking structure, brought in another station, converted a restaurant, and put in landscaping and parking, and are even talking about expanding it because it has been eo eucceseful. He thought some day that might be viewed ae historically significant because they took part of the old and combined it with part of the new and made a better center, Councilmamber Wright etat¢d the Cucamonga Schcol Dletrict will be celebrating their centennial next year and thought the Commission might be interested in that. Councilmember Wright stated she would like to get some information regarding a hitching poet that was reportedly etlll standing on Poothill Boulevard near Rochester Avenue, and she was wondering if anything was ever done about preserving that. She also stated they have spoken in the past about pulsing markers out for buildings that have been preserved to help identify them for the community, and wanted to know the et atue of that. Councilmember Wright felt they needed a program to continue educating the public of the historical buildings in the community. Commissioner Banks stated the sign program was moving ahead, that there were brass plaques on a few locations. Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner, stated a developer was picking up the coat fOr the prototype, and what they were trying to determine now was if the City could initiate putting up plaques. City Council/Miatorie Preservation commiuion einupe May 2Z, 1991 Page 13 Mayor stout asked 1f it would bs pouible to put out a map that showed the ` location of all the hlatoricel Ltras in the city. Commissioner Banks elated thn comanlnlty outreach euMommittee was working on producing that, she atsted they era working on producing a walking tour for the schools Ln the Btiwenda area since they cannot always afford field tripe that involve buses. She felt the Commission could do a lot of things, but that the public needed to 6e aware of them. .. 1f1Y \:VYIIV Ll anY VVOmL11Y LV11 YLYVYYYYY VK LVYY WayY VL 1,L VIW LLYt~ IILYLVL LVYI LVYLY in the City. • f • t x x D. CCIDIDMICa1IOM8 PRCM T~ PDaLIC D1. John Anicic, Jr., Pontana Historical Society, complemented the Council and Commission on their open communication, end stated he fall Rancho Cucamonga had a voty good historical preearvetion program. x • e x • x MOTION: Moved by Willlame, seconded by Wright to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (august absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved by the Hietozic Preeervat ion Commission: June 6, 1991 Approved by the City Council: ,... i e ~ o w N•O OION•ilwhieN••NONNONYY•wNONOYhNVO O N O O O! ••O wNON•YNIOONNONOINONYVNONeNMNiw00 r• • ^ O h N ! N•N NO•N1YOONNYwONMONNN• •!h•NMVNOIN N V O Ny0 4w~•1•N4<MINNhM^NNh~~NMwNO^Oy10MN O N 1 N • N: O O• N 1 •MNNNNw NI- r• • NNN N V •1 N N u i i •' °1' Vsw 2>O t0~ OML J F O Y L • w I• I• N /1 A I• N ~~ \+ %• A A A n A A A A •01 JM O•••OLO-wO•hIN•~MAOwONNNIN hYNO.1N01•YOw0004NN•NVwiNO_M :I»azaMzatta~xzaaaazzas:ssss~:s:ncnnnnanna=sxsYSasss f• aNNNNNNNMNMNNNNNNNNMNNNwNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNwYNN ::\ ONNNNNNNwNNNNNMNNNNNNYNNNNNNMNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNYNNMNNN •i• O • • Y u•ILI IYI 1 IYI 1• L ••• L• • 1 • • Z MiN OLN N• O • N Y S • Y wVJ •L•4N w = • • • NOM Ni„iN N Mi •N1MY M ~ • Y > VN YN S S • NyN N- EN N Ni St'"~ O N ri L 1 V N~ YNIN 11 • < J O p! '- O 1 • N ~M p • • i O Y O iYi V Y Y Y„ N w <> V • vVV vp v'JV v v u i f YW Nw; J< si LW • i vNV uovuvlgv vrYavY i ~ wy rN ui ~4y pv • : VyV ViV VMV VNi•Vi > f Fi {J •N J J Y V • ~ J O i 1Y V Y O yL YOL ~Y1 y~` N Y ~ ~J i M L Y{ i V- OM Jie p~a •• Y V_ t i YON W w L iY :i <ON Y) y S • ` YN\ F : { Oi NFL N i OS1-O < Y ' r i O>•Yi J F i W1•-< Lf O N IVNO O 1 yl Y NyyiW J yV`W hyi i i Y h \ ) N i0 SJw •ONS~V p VNWwpN ~ •i: O 4 N V OM <LiN NOitV L MW~iO :M I O M J>> i h J y <M i OaN =NM V1. w N O O _W ! La VJL•Y li Y VJOIJiNOO W •h~ a 9 • J 4 W Niy YY F_ _W wN lwy W i htlLh0~0 L_ i p _ N_ J F i„y•iYN M Mw iVNYMyNL`Ni •y• ~ N W V~ f0 YiNV J~ VMO •W i"J JOtYL N •Y• 1 y M w J Oi JNOiOM<L {VVYYYYNOYJNMOW i •H• p JN7~W NYMi <1 )i NJiOMiOM JM{ yi>1(O • o 'J t N Yi0 '<ML4Yw NOM <V i{YMN=JNMYY wN• • V : J V M i>i LLYi <W ii M iW Ny iYiWJiYi ~O: O Y Y f t-Y iY J iYJ tlY JOOi Oi.bFLUNOMyJOi y •W• d w w J i F Y YYw YOMMSiJyYOYNYi'l hY9WyYOP Mi-hMtY~ •• N W i i W J Oa ~2<YaiYiLiY`L` ~yy~JJ~•V`M••<{{LiNVi iViNMiV ~M• 1< V t i~ L M~~ •Yw~~O~ii~~pa~iw M•YI~MNSN-IJVMrY~U • • J • • Y ~ y yy p i V py • • t ~ Y JY N YNi N J W j I.• • N i V pOp> •Y T OWN Y • N yN O O • ~ N ~ ~ Mi W;Ji YJ• ~ i i y i S • W N N JO aY L Y-i O J J N W < <V NO i 09a i i<V< NN N Y iaW • i= i y O N~O JNLY Fa abYW F i w hi0 • • F Y Y OOi YyN Y ii iJ LNYL NY OY • u p i J N wiY sa• iilf as J<YYUau Ye iN i .Ys • i L N ppyyII W yWYY=JLM>iY<4 ypMiwY O i i W{ w 90< iiJ~Y J Y<M 7M ihOJY w y p>N • Y h V Y OiY yL Oi YMNWYiOM00< WMOfi>Y hi04 i 9 N < iL iJW M<FY>O_w VM• YYLF40W •WYJL • • O Y . L Mi i <YL i Vo ~J M:i:y eYY WYY VO • F • V YN N~Mi NOh=w! <~ i•J>Y N~wM J • • ~ V O_ Y W_ Y MYY iWi iWW WV NY Oi1N aiY • M N W OS L app Mi N <2NWL< Wig iiwf FY h W: „ ~[ Y y i J y O{Y StI JOOf J y>VyJWihwYi<NY~Yh~y •i U> i i i V JiS WYIYY<-YFYWJYYY9JJYLEih<WtOiiiY~J :_• O O < f \ 4 =N< VOVydLLi)<WWMbOY<O«WWyJJOOb0000 • S > f Y V Y N f NN «« f<i« OOOiOiiVVYYYYVVYYYVYYYY •f• h N O Y N N www NNONwYNw•NNwNNONIMNwO.ONN•NN•NON •O• a N Y w O N N NN• Nw0<ONNNwwNINaNNNN ONVII.<OfNYNwNh n ° w nwe NeNNanryN<Ni ••eNA<„ whNwveNw< 'W: N NN N.IN ••' NN N wNNN N NNN NN N • ) i iu u• ! h PNONONI.OVNOOOOOPO.ONMOhOV10NMOOhON NO•wONhh•NOPOON •wOPwOIwhMOw;000ON0.ONNOPONONh ;OwVO•hOfM.NNfN•O.ON. hm~h•NhNMOhPPO1N •ONNnYOwryhlNNwNlOhhNY1h •NPlN•O.fNhh >•w0•P{wNINNNmOwSMINN•w^ NOwN^Nw^n wNMwwNnNNNPNOV O hNNM N w NN NNw00 VN • u O yiy NP 9~N Vfl NN Si0 iiO YDM hW ONi J > i M i U m w w N w h Ow • w O i JNn•NOhWNONNI'•NV>NNOMNNINOMNOONNN•NO>OINNYN•NYMNIOJN I`1IICC:::::::5'..S:N..OLiLSLfiCCtfiRiRftRtCitCC'NwNNNNNC~'X'i'X O MMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNnNNNYNIMNNNNNNwNMN Y_ W . • . . • N. w • O.N U N~ ~ „ S fN N n ! S • N KIVn • i N ZN N P \ N N! i NJ • = 1•w N ^~N \ O N ~ h\ ~ ~ W heh i iN • N•~ • ! ,1 ! N M• N hOf N N O \ F N •Y N1 + Ow N I I Y i •NY Y 1H O N± W WNO~ N ~YJf9 < NI ± J NIOI .OY ON! i NJ N< f N SOYfN J il•f OW hf O J f •OI h ONW fi` VUNh NO iD 11 N OWf MfV h fON<Nh WN IYi JifiN 00 Y 10 N> VMf <YO f• iN \ONNii ViY UM i>WfiNNww N • Ni01 fN O ihJif iYWi.N WW Eh 1i WN•1 -:N>~`h N ! W W MN p0• WW ~• JiVhNiVW ~I A00 N ZW ~Y•MWIi _OI >OOMWJ: JNNOfN>wOi h~Y jpjpW~ff J>i_•NJ NV UH ~90NJINJN\N ~ juN~Wi9 hYi Wl{i •NYN~i1f If~YYYOh pV Yi'J JJ1' N ViMYYNY Z•JZ[NNDON W~~{~NiwlW•i1N00-MNiIitNNYZiNOw WYWi iLhNihWiNfY YNf OOi YWi hYN h `` i YWY «Y YONi~ Of ON Nf\NJf Ji DN WWONf hN~iY= ~ff hNfiJ Z OOiYWwpr >OY h>iY`:LYWJ [JV<iNif Y M~ J UiM eJNiuNNh>•Z WOW VN VOaWN <> ,NNiW1NW N i •< ••JM MffW:W YON=YO. O 00<OiNJN by YJOfiJYVOiaOJOYh ONO n iV Wf <OWJiNi<V \<MiiNNJMViVO{{f N~OiYiNN IUNJYOfMN.NNWLWpWIhf9iVWNwY002YafOfiM9NhiVW1 iM Of> N Yf JOiWN{NW,JNiiJNiiiMJMf ONN UWiWNi `M` ZiNMiJJN~~iLiW yyY ~~~i~VOMf~iJiV;iiwYifOYYwAO~~iVr~wii>tNV~iifWtlGGGNM>Y~•1 N y W N i h < W J V N V V a r N ZJ > W~ Z V Mf JY V { W h- {t V Z y Y_h J V M O N J 'J W~ < N N •Ji W O- li {{ W 00 {NAM <S ~U VaU • Y W yiV iL O i i Oi0 ~ W W J YY J-N{ ~~ YW NJ YY W iYVi { J iW NO• J J N_M _O N Ni Z y irNi~hOWiV N VMMUuWJNOM-ip>hJY~Ji V•L'I >~O O<oiiih<iWh{ V iV\SNV~~N~ZfNV~iJ%•~%LWMijMMiMV O~YfNYY^NrN~O~~W- N=MyWN NOOO iiOJ7iiW9i hJMYOtlY Oi<WW• •j{>00 VVN < YWW{WhMNNWW 9W hV{IwONiYNN •fMiJJV •NO O O YW _ _ Ji Wh1w Y• V~J>HV Ni0 WY •W Vhf V •O-OYMJVY • •> JM •i MJ • i> • • •YhNJ • LN~f~ O NM.Wi >< NNJ •{hlYifNl Oi00 ZO •W iNOi •OYi{ Z{WWO fYFW f~ WWNWiiNJiVYYNYOJV f<JMNNZNiNW>{MfttlhhVJ{MWO VhNYY N OiW0029{WYiiUiJOVJJh>ZiiONi<WNViyVi~ JiW00 VCWWWYWWWiii1LWYYVOZiZZiZiYNNN191YNJJJJJii{iifLiZi00 NN•NryNNNNVVN•ImImNPNNNNPm~NOmOmON••NNO<INVO•NNVmNY N O•OONOwOmPONONNN/OVIi<OPNOOlOYNO.OONOONN•OIONOhm NN mm N wNw•N• N• N^• NNN• NN •• w•NN w•N•N E • s r: .. , E W u• ~ { i i .• .n+rrerawweena+laNnasaa+IOfe•ronlwwwwwwelw+NleweeN •«• r+NNIeOeOMOONawVO0aNV000wOONO n..O V1aOM«NONfNnN000001 \1'• A+wHIVn1NM«~Owwh~aOwS'Mf OnVIVMN~MrhaVwO+NTVfNa~'IEI«/N1N NNw N«I •n.. NNa N •« Nn wNON « « N N + VM r \• N•f• w I a n N « w «« N N •Z• n• 1 W• w• • f • • O• • R• • 'JI / Y• •_: JnVNih O«NnVMVhV10NNnIN+wIMOrNnaN+wfwlrNN NO A N w 1 N nA AI .In Nn ~f1.w'e~•i•.wiwww'wwwwwwlwwifiXY.Xltii'L'X"A'4'1.'1C12!'X'w%YXXXXX~XXi~fiCS N n w i w wwn w N www wwnw w nnw N w ' w n o ' w ' ' w' ww N iii n• i . i. ll i.n • i o n ww w .ww n ai a v.a. In w iw u.. m a • • i • • i i u .. I e + f. 1 e • .+ .I • • • 1 • W h W N ~• i n N ' W i Y • V • Y U YM V p Y( f Op V Y O V O • • • • L qi ( 1.1J N M y M L 'L d :1 : ~ r4 ~ •~X ~ EY ' . f J N DO w.y f «h i i p «h y (:e. NL V • • LI Lf w i w L\ V YNY (i w0 O i«wf NW 1 1 h0 riLJ W «L i < y1 r.e E yinW IU On N• E. 1!I< • MWp«M hf« < w O D M (Nw • / • ~ = N YW i 00 Ya Mf0 JOFf« iM .i O whVwf •OW <F1 UZP I • • • LN ` OYL N\ VYO JN« Ly~NY h V ` `VJ iD .[ • J•1 NY wN NNS ( e ~i h 1 >OOiO\ ySEN y•N • • P {\ f(MO «O hi{~wWwl J W OY 2 O W <OJ YW< Yfl I • (N hf ON 4Nj O (.Y YY-Yw 2: p W\MgOJ M` U M J i fN p10 I • • 0 tNw~g {i 0 rlNS7fP Y«O« hN{iN JV 11 O YN f VM N'JO yJ1~ <i0 l ff INN11NWfi OJ y Li / : p « f « YJW WNWyOY .Oq iW2p YON {LLNNI a~'JY<le WO 1< V .. /2 M WVFiLfZYFJ WOe •JM<NOI wM« Y i f«OOnVN JMJ9e NiVh ioe i.Dii ` hw~w~VhJO?1.'10 •'OY'.t FW~UJ .'•~~iiLISOYiONbI'.l ellw ifH Wh. y f « /F• ~ Wiew «L«W wiMYLNf` Ih WD YJJt« O.iWwY»~VJONWUYf NWiO Mf OrY •6• •«• I _ i{ Oh(N(LyNLiL •IL~Y:>( 0 0YF 1 wh 1 I WIM. Y OV2 LJI YwW N Y V Y AW iNVVw00« 1«1JJ <\ 1 JL IYI yy ~ / OhJ.{.iNV~\MOf iii±NMNYJO~w\ONf11YYiwiJO IDNfy•1ph. .Wh •N• : I b .OwtLN NO iNW« Y O( •YO YNf<fWOn010\ F4Y. Y{ FO L •P• _ y 1 Nlw«fN~N.''JwV«OOV42WjW OIIIi<i.+~li'h.~w11 NON.{~ yOpfi V • •W• r •J .20M«Wff.«ahNYV MNNIIYWO NO J')iJOONW\Ni MhtMi.• hN NFwpwliNh41« O YZywMN«(YWwM«{«LNNnF VYWJiOM9FY • ~ = ..LpLYNNwJ F(iN20Npp Ne> i JJ iiilll VLie«IWIiV 0 11 ~ ~ ' •« « •SyNOVWi YI~p 0 1 9W.JOIN•Y IO~DIONn V.;.VN> J OfIJV •«DiL1.{YlV fLtiNi.>lVN<OfYNY qNN VJVaN9 NV«q{iJL.UV • • • • f 1 1 • i FV • • V O ii f .j• i + f M J i V u o i { u . < « w N <•p. i a sD i .s p 1 1 ~! y Cf W N i ' N • • iLJ f 3 wL N •( M Y Fi YN .< M90 i0 N DJNV y1 N NO i O M .{ 1 5!6"'8. SI$o Y„N8E .ilNw. t o 98 C flfi `li ~ • • ««:LY fe >YJN. O.sNi Df u N e< w uhWW y • t 1 ~ ~ \Y~ OY w yl y y t i « O • W. . iVN V i «Y OYY •Y > wi ( W O. i T N • YW>L(hypf ~YW OJ VifMWWwfOWO iYY~.WhpOVN iW.y •2p . 1 ~ YSVpf«O«7 iiNW>( «wU7 V.Wi OSMNN ~•h{{ LNJi V i p N~j~Yf WWiMV{1'hN'~N •OYf ~~Pi.'+1 WOEWhiOO~ O«iY .i. JWL • W p N4WVN N~ ' Y W YiH M Y «; :' • ~ .NV W 3Jw..f WeO J O JwpJ \ «YY .I~I.qN OV pl 'UJVi7iSLrhWh~MYOVG<WfCiYJV:UJYtY .i y.L...LiwWYJJE'JUfY~.i • • «WNOO< WOfVi UiNO NOYN7> Z D>WNLN JJJLJ<ffhMOINMI • • •Y• W{MHVLLO( 2<NWWWNS O• WWO(+NVVF000 2<f<My««Oyy WNWWN > <Y4F0< « MJE <M~ FUU V2 1 J f •(• Fy D FO V V yiOYyVJ.V 9 i V..YOY(tNWr090i{7>«>N«OiJU::fiWVi i<WYfNUJOSi• •i• OOLwLL{~L{{~i~liVYfMOOf.riINNNNNNNNNMNNNNNMNNFF«Fh« • ~ •(• OwNNINwwNNNNarnNaONPNNVNVONNaaNVNw aIIhNPVNOOOJNwnNn.. •O• rNwrrwwwNM.O«nOOVPnNO «haNIIwNOVNNaNN«i.IN INOMIINN N• •pi •i: .w MNINV^nwNNNV n•.N „nNNN«NN Nrr V'O wNrNNNN~NNn N1.VMN+VNNn NN VN«N N 1 N~rNN •> J u e .• iNw ':d 7•N Vi~ o1e ii ia0 i °.°• a r ~°u ON6 J h O u a 6E •E E :• ,: W; u ~i i • •• ^e••ewNeeeN•e•N«•Ne Nii• •••~NNeNewre••h•ro ~ O.1• NN•OI.O N••1•NNN!_•OO1•e h p••• wNNNwNNONVNri O•MNN O •w•r w viii N w N•<• N O•i• N Wi i h• l• O• ~i i O s• 1 •O• J•NV«•w•rN NfNOrOe•MN iii CwwwhwwCT~xiiRRlS2Riti ii• ew•Ni•w wnwwwwwnlNilwww•°Iw n•°1 iii i • u• • ,•1 •• • i i i { O e • • Y M • • f N { i i i s r e • lu h s \ • N j hi OW M i J i f 1\ h • Y f i • •00 1 1 r h • • N io w w •s srW e ~ i Z ~t ANI\•M •O i• F • • Mha J\Y JJ •i0 O • • WW JJJ WNNw•N~J nW NIV O j Ni'JYNr~~N iNNr V• i• YNIJNOa ONyJ• VO• ie• OY 11•Y~ih1i hOi •M• LLOYi••VVNM•1 •MI NMW ii• owi•~ai~J~~N i ras •V• hVW 0i00•••JrMY J_N_{ iW% ~iVYrl••~JNJ MNVVOpNpN Y r1•WOPa11NrNOYa•it%Y •O Nif II Y•Ni J •i• Jh000Yf`V Or000•J VNieNNiYOJN~11aNa•!i• ~w~ N•YV~~•~Z;taeii•iiwai i • • 6 ~ N V • _ •M • O N • V N • M • r W • yJ Y • O : E Ica saa • F • f VJ hs i • • O = ~~W • i • i ° o i u.'. w r e .°. • • >f iVMJ Y J ifYh O • •O N•.•1i }}..yy O • rNJJN rhMOrJFOY~~ WiM iiVVYO%NOOOV hWM •• Mf Wi{YOY • NhrNV Nf•N%1___OYW • •T% W _•__ V V O • • iWOOh YWY O • • \ W IOf WWW VYWi W •i• NJ•hiaJNNNNVrYNNNNf ~h <• Vitf `•Y.•MfffWWWWWOW ii• J~v9rlrarlfiiiiii%~N • • NMIONhOONNO«NJ•hN00 •O• OMNNOV•NONYrOMrOONN O• V„~h••ll~o•N~NNNNlN ii• NN N N Nw :Y 4 i ~ E .Y E W. : ~ . .. Y MOO «0000 OONNrOTOONN•'•tl T000pO00PPP NNOOOrN0000000 YhY 00 rOOrO PNNPNOwMNNNrOrONOT0001•N« •YNOOhPTPtl0001O~ n YZY P1{Y ••• OPO • POwON •• •1 •• • ••Y ••Y TN'ONTwNMwOOwOTwhNOrNOnINP p\NONrNpONNPNp \• r..p «O«wp wTNTJTN P 6NNPtlNTNpwNIINNrr MOrhAOONNT00••T V•• T MONO Y p T P NN rNwPT TO «N«Ttl«•1 O•¢Y \• u' Y aYf• F « T N r •• « T M h o~2Y i N : < • Y 2 • ~• h A A /• M A ¢ N r •O• JNm wN r /~j NwN l hpPtlJNTrNwhpPO«NTVNwI•b?O••N T <N wI-pP0«NTrNw :i: Wma aaea aR~as ssssassasssaoe<asoevoesava esavaasaaaaaaa •i• arN NNNN NNNNN waaawwwwwwwwwtlwawwwwwwwwww wwwrwwwwwwwwww •Z• ONN NNNN NNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN V•NNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNN 11<• YL• • Y[ • • • u!I 1 ! 1<! ! tl ! 1 N !tl • ! ~ • S w Y Mh T = ry p P N hNl N T W ¢ O V aow s 1 rw P i < s : • ~ N N« V i a Y Y II N \ON W N < rNN Npp rJN JT ! q Y : • LL \ U L ^WW b0\ h O i2 .700 r y\ P« N W \ N Y Y NW M W t< OiT P Nr• 1 N i Y• V VV V 1~ IOV S\ T Py \P J Y O •~• iNP Y• • Y V V 2{V O¢V > 1 V N Nw • WhV V i h PTTK 1 )NY w\ y p ! N y2N Y hW Y Ut `Y«i.• JP1•N w WZ O 1 7f0 V¢1 11 • Y: tf V• h JPSOW P0. P P\\M i 10 LL\OMZ W\\M\ j¢ i S1 4 MW LL W W Ji ¢a O<O • • Ntl¢ WWV I..Z O N N«O WNiNNOT N\NN 0.W hN WY. \1'•F 1•VWi\\WNON\w2¢ p JC LY YNNOW d<6 i< >¢WU« SL y wJ ZL NOwWi 2«WVw¢Ni\N Np p JN 90 NOMfJ V • •Z • JWO YN <V<Z6 {N i pJl Y NYY OJW! N 211D <Oq Y~Y V W LVO 1L iW OS Y. VYii6 WWW O NOJLJ 0. O1L0.W MW06CG WOWW¢J yp O! SNWW VLGJ• hILiVNWO 2 7 •F• J 70 hh 6ii¢¢iYRJLLGN6 0.yLLlNb2 OW OY. 71'nWyh NO~NN 1-4 LLNw 0.• W fV N F1` h0 W02h0 h660. Nh'J }¢N2hM ¢EtJ }Wh WW OON}JNU LnN•• LL \itlLL~NN SW 00. YyY 11 Jig S22LL0 J OOM<JMWWWJhJ¢YWJYfW W2 LLWfLL¢IbJ SWU ¢ O f NWWO J}LLih2iJOp60ONOWZJON¢N2W ~ YOWNhOhN 6G i V YN LL { OW} y0 <ii W UYhWW lUW{ O fOWW GOON<JOf JMS ZW30iW0 WWV2Gi iVYOMJ :J •4 NIY'O NF< T<tlLZONZMUZhIZ « IL i <CNh YWI[{M JhOY[K2U yiW)y f J PN ¢POM rV<OW V J NO CGrO WOW iOJIL'SWW•nNpNUI- NZNOWI OOFpO O N¢NV2h YL• hV2 h WJ JKZUZYMi'JRiOhJ)022hrOM}Y ILJJLLtlNJOh>M02 Yh! W 42N JN1 M}hJ4 lWi JWOVM72NLLOOifi<OMWf~OLLON OiV¢NOYfWVUtJ JSfWJOWD02 NiOYN~pJL2f¢LL« TWOM2J<7OOJptW< M• O 0.UV CSiCW >WNhJNTp¢NNN6r4YZF6hONVM JZf1Y7Y)4. ..lVGNO[Z Y Y N ~1 N Y O V J 2 O Y M Z 0. U J Y '~ 6 N y N Z f M •1 • S W ~ i SY' O h h j • ~ W _ _ V N J O O Z 7 i S LL L y LL V Y W 2 O IW p Z NO O Y ¢ ~W 2SM aONKW { ¢ OSJ O N MM2 lp <ih<hK< V p ZW R¢hN Z hN LW6Y V W h:2 WN{ h•+ OVtl S LLOf ~h6 h VY•2 ZY¢ if DhYtV • W¢O¢ cilV 6NVOh~ OWM S< iplhlNYV ~ VK¢ • J Kh VVWO lNy pZU JhWM2W ZS{ZO«6SN y¢Vh N06h MWZ • W V • •J JW Z6N4it~Y O7 t>ihMM 1iNOM OWNN pN2 •i0 Z • Y V w~i Wy2W0 J tl < OMO ph7 W>tM WY •h •2 !Y •6 COh •N1L _ 22 •O}hM,l SV W • M WO ZOW¢• 22.0 j ••KM• 6202WN•O K W O • W<N'lW« •N Y ~ •GS SOON I HN<fWOZO¢fWJhW• OIY«W W1[ iYN •Nii¢W NU N• •IY V K« YJ2 OU Li N23)4 22JU'OOWpKW¢YZ7UYUY.>V}) hh~60.{¢<1LK¢N¢•IDOJJ2r •I«h0 f NYK hWZ002«¢ VN}UVNNVVy6Mpi ap wVV~60ii« KVWJJif IfiIZMJ J fN••IfUONNi « •2• p pLL> N¢N ¢t f4 \1f<OpOppppODUVyVUUU VOpOOWWWWWWWLLIL Y¢Y NPn a0••N! h\OPOnnnwmhhtlahrwPOTON NPpNPPTrPh\P N•.1 •O• p01- m 000 TPpwP«nwOP•• ••r HNmPpwOnn m NNTNhNpNMTNON p YO• Y2• n NON Nr mNr NPNTMOpN ryNrPNN OhryO N«N aNN N«Nn p w NNtlw•~Np<TONO •I N «N •N ' YWY r ~>• J Y O iNP <MI upi b Of0 Zi V_ ~~ OC pYLL > H LL YZ• Yf• Y YO• Z Y Yl• Y3• Y Y Y Y • O I i21Yi YpY Y R Y i Y i i i w Y • Y Y Y ~ Y ~ i Y ~ Y Y YOY YY• Y V IN: TO11 YWY r Y Y • Y Y • Y Y i1 2• ONPONOi0i0000NNPN'OMNNpTVOeOpbONiP0000NmPO0000000VON OhbNNOTOMOONOONNNN•hNOOm000ptlONY•NNOOhTN00000MNNNON •1 OhTOmOOPONN¢bNPT•bOtO•PNOmPhPNibhTNMMOPiOONNTPOTNO ONNNNTbPNi•••TTPhO„NN•aMPNNT NNmrrMNONwNNNTq~w•ONN N wN N •N hN N • N wN P N N wT ~ N N Jt PONNTiN~OYIPpNNT•NVMOPONNTiNbtOPOMNT•NmYtlPONNT•NpM i NNMNNNNNm e e eOOtttttttt l1000tl1ltlPPPPP P W~o~eooeepemeee~~g ~ ~g etlppmoooeeoOpooOeooeoee~o~ aoboNbmmmWWbbbbCN•bbmmmbommbbmo•aebbvWmlNmbbbmlb•!bN ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Y u• . ! ..! . !~• . . . i : W J o Js u • a Hs I JN M NP P Z 0 P M 7 VC WW T M SN M • P\ \ PN M <N P P i WO LZ 1 yN Y P \N N TPMP UVI[N \ i 'YZ N SY N'O N;W w \ N\ \ PNZ\ i\O N O Ot W W PP •2 b P N \ b b i N O e 0 2 \ V W! N w N Z M N N T ~t \ \ N •\V\ iOiU O OJZiPJNlM Nh N Nm JW N b W W bJb fNF! > \YPIL 00 ^\ JiN\ PW4 4 N Y t VN!{ W J•IYONL\Wt m __W Pb W r \LLG > pWWWV J fi • 'J VF\ON00 wN S\ >NO N N6 Z60pLL{ Upll 6 9Nf ONa f 00{Nb0 P aONW \Ilhl I FV :~6W WI IOIPwNW ~\pOM\LL KW N\ NW mIW W OLLWN I OWJ UZ O\• VNNIlNO6 Wb NWJ JOI NZ W W<6tOSVWZO •2NN120\N!M I WJ LLmZ< 1 J O~yLLYN%VNNZ7M\60O t.YN\O < eT W6 6 NJ JW LWSWN WMON ip' 70ZYJ\NNO SY000N U~OIZZN NNZO.W WtNf pp pw NV WV_\tl_JJ<WWOO<SLN%iP\N NO •Z NOWTwb 262 WNOM LVO %N6w >M WpOLZSOZ O.tMOi \ZKOm(YNMY G 10 V WWNK N OIWNOLL OLL p {M OWl7NY.Yiit OI 06~NYlLL< VIW t•F I.ILLOILO =pwNmNINVWfi1NYNOrNJ4KWWNW\1>•NIN22LLYmOSO< WNOLLU M h Y WOZlZN W hUYMCMJ60 NOZS NOOLL {U<2i VW{FNJW• Wj?JwST ft fJVfN Y~ UJ<MlW6UW WJfUM<JCN~O ZC 000 OY~f%OSOIOO `U Y WM<GZNKW>pF.LLOJ :N OO LLY WWNj= 0Y<y0 ZVNi JNNWNLLO DNYONNZ~OU• WjWWJ Wi Z NVO SM!< WS2VJ<W06LL\} •NC Z }wLLUONMMwCWJNVVNJWODUNYWSYLLN00 i<TUNOVNGON26WV NI•.f 06Z ~0 NF}tJIYJVh6N20iMTM>SS h• Y~ZYe NJ0NM2t7 ~NMtwYNNN U\WOJOOmOOwJ000'W60WWWJ<WWOO.}WOVO%IOI.JMSJOaJW<YLLJWOJJ6 ZNTON6MfPVTVLLJMZMNNOT>iTOi{e00WV06VLLVUWYp00000.SNNUN J < UZ ZO LL Yw ~ 0 F M U < Wf Y W 6W> UZO O W OW N > SZ V UN 7 ~ N fFf wl N J Z NUF O•Y wV O S J JLL U S N 'JJ NO V2 t 7 O J f0 w0< 20U MJ IN pWi 20Z L 02 •OS 00 YJ 2W iZN t 20N N V 2 <20M<00< MOMJ % 2102 Ow NU fLL>~< f pWNO ~> =?;aJU6f00f VwN Uf 0Y W0USY2U»MU<WSONWOS'+NY Yf> OVWOW WSwn i< JJNSJUxI<ftONi ~2J}W06 Y0N0 4LIY wOJW Sw6J6Y026U wJwuJOS%0 Y00>O Y•hLOiWMJO •N U<T10 {NWON 0 OL <L O• ZUZimY LL JlM •~}NLUNLLJZwO• O•N O"1 .06 ••JV202f <W N •<• NtN•JN0 h02 IJNZ> iU00<V Np<%<V• W•JNV %20fY• fNWINJIYi00fW< J• JVfN O W• 2WJM U fWwWWiV~JNW ON{22> i • WNNW •L SwW20V<PWw OJJ000 JY. JdFJUiuw SIY0J0ffOZNx2MUwWJUUVauMOfV O U'0 PZwM 20Zi0J<wwUOVJF000JJ2iJDL ZZY022h SIN~YJYOYDOUlWVV WLLLLLLUV00N « VOO>SZ222WJ20 « WMD}><UVWWMOOO7J <tN if< LL UtfVLiSLLZNwNwNKOYKJJJJJJJiiYLi22YiZZ22ST0000• NNrT•PNNTNNwTbPVbPOOOPwNbPhhmTO~ONOON•N•rV000••00TON PPOTTNNNrPNrvObNMOOTN~myNO:+PNTbN„N N nwwNNr N mr! Y •rN.~1^ rv JJ•a • NN N W INP ViM O<O Unl ¢a =~0 Yn o° y H NW oHs J V U LL m; :c :: w. . V/ ~ • i ••• NONOMhPOONTO0I000VM1NhNpOPOOTNmPVOOM1ODNaPONNwIV 000tlP• Y • TNNNhbmbNVbtlOh000NNNhNNOVOObhtlO000mOOFOMtlwrwNOONOTN w:Z• •1 •• 1 p { NhM1mPhNTtlWtlNOVNNTTtlNPbNNONONOtlPNNM1OhmOhOMbTNNONnPa \YfY P PNNnVTOTNNyNNNNPO0Im0-0OaNNVamhVmmhTNNamNTPTMTNVO a•1• N NNP OaNh Nmww NwNwN NNNNT O N Pw OY6 \Y¢• n N 4 PH N M M aYa• n n 913Y WY i • i ~• • P• / • I S• • ¢•OY JtlPOJNmVNmhtlPONNTIMbhtlNONNT•NbhtlPOMNT<NbhtlPONNTVN'•h0 •21~ WOO•piH M•piMMHMw•OI M•wiyNMw.H1 •NIA•NI•NI.N4 NwMwHIYY~~T'IAAAMMwHw•NIMwA~Mti~~ti Iln• abVbbbbVabbVaVaVVbaVVaaVbbb-0bbbaVbaOVVbVVVbbVOabVbbm •It• mNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN •<1 •3• • 1t • • Wi i i ! Y • i i i! < iilii j j y I Ti<M %W • n mWNN MH i • wsHH s <z i • • u soin zc • W l HJJW W JJ J W J • W n OW<• W 00 t <N N WJO / Y[ O JH3p OP M LW n O j W i U VIYWN Wn ZS U V U YV i • n0 O N S mP UV O V ~ • pH J~p WWNN Oa WNN hi LL V> > YiN VN qT V NYnNW Ui 4!Y> 2W j LL m•LW ¢ WiNi NM NZ ~ aMNN Fff WO OJ6WVF W WJfW ~ ~ > LLJJMW O•F JZW Y ,<JJ O tfNi2YN m JL Ji JSV Y{U VY.Y JH F40a>Z O m3 !WZ pU Jw 06G<SNJOf pfJZ y Mtli IT pWIt2¢ZWS TG ~ V <LL NJ WfT nWnVfJ W.IGZ NI SVUOWYV NIW¢04 •2• V m~ FOOJZNOVFWYHm WWWT IN 1-Y W_wY Np¢ WPWWVO •M• tl LLN YWV VIIhiNHOPWNLLhSfOPNKIHOO M'Jtl 2JpJL OIOO~N •1. OL1JfH W2 •OVJVFP HUJJiWVJnryN20 •VVWmWY 3LLJn OJ Y61 G vlOf4 ZOyHO W 6<nNNO[N66 1- bOIWN<m2 1 Y F OZa M• 2 J2 PJJflZG2WYJw y6 ZYOZ¢6nNH f<Yr4W> <iVY\h ~V 'J OmNw ¢Y~O UW6UGHIOWWiH aITJJpHJ ZWpF 1.WWrv'J ZZ ~ W nZOtOW fi N2 W(<Y 7 •N nm6`WJiiM •[ V M¢ N11. W •N• MJF2W >6W F.ayONyOYOhMLLnW I h „6 >i UmMnWW¢ cnaVy R20W6 NZVS UwNtl`:WFOOmhDtlVJ~ aW yw6Z p: P m~aMM<LL~UY bWWiNW<nM n PIDNY «hY OZ VO JJHWYfi f<n NY:J •Zt aNF~~-~< ~fW}{>6N 2V M1> hYYLLLLYmTTWKhWJW<hr<WJL~9hWN0>1 / SYiYOZWOL<HmMSYNSONH2YMSLLpIl3NYZnV¢HNOJNJZSZJfSJ YI-• nJJOOWnOJZJOJf « ON700NfOONOOJVa « OWhW6~h1 mHZ20HJ(W •H nVLLVVn<i1UmVViJZynmVmOOVyFVNVmnVtlVUN¢NhNmZULL<tVnVJZ 1 / ~ • S Y 7 J y J S 6 LL a M J 'A V N Z • ~^ O O J • fu > N V H O Y <¢ S V f i 6F 1-O ~ 2 < K K < ¢ HLL u 2 J W h O¢z r 26 M R NJ VJ G VU V H J M mWM 1 Of22 W O K Wf wn <o H 1.¢ I Hwa< ¢y m y zH Y / i O JV • y Ny 02>R YOFXFW OH < ZV Mn ~ Y LLVt F WrNn<W ZOZ hWW¢ZfnJ ODUNNO UK Y: ¢2 ~ Jh JH HJ n.JHWY> W 7y~ WHNaJN Wr7N Z { n•YIN OzNO[HmSY<m2MN0 NJZH Ji`JVF<HNSOOS J Y>JW p OYJ Y JZWmJZZZUHZOH nNOi• <NO~Sh JH mOZWO y JWJ JH< VW40J9Wyyf220 •K2nVHWVZ06 <YSNWHUY2U~W2 • Wl~~•J 6<YOL>L~OZH7YZOWWr VMLL Nil •N6V<WYm~fW JH V 23LLSZYN 9 ¢HZy«NLpJ •• ~YU hY2¢ O a1LV Y p0 MOJH• •F VAN p O<HWNN •O • Y JWZNNwnyWO¢VW2 ~•O •nyN>WhLLf VJJnYWLa>~WGNn1Npp<Zi•i • • WWOnnZn O WnWfmNLON< LNO•[htaWMZUHMW02<W\WWW>WOMH •LY UYrMFV6<HiRHHJ YYVYYOZZWWi VVZW¢JJ¢>VOKNVHN2mhISl J666n<~ f<riw¢HpHpv<iH N~rHNh /Oi„YNNOf W¢J .z2z1<.fw iii aan<nnuin LLa ¢rcn¢nn nn N NYYrh » »>aaa3 Y ini a Y-NI-nN nNOa NhmNNVbNNmPlrmPmbemmmaiN..mTN<PbmNTtl NO6 OPN HHV TmanPaIOVTN nTmmmnmlv'OV9VPNNwNh Or.IN •O• OIO aVhmbNNH~rNNOONNnVmNNh~mNTNarya VPNVONh : W: rN aN w N N ry M~ N N .w N N N m N •>• \ u_ e N iNP \hl uzm ego url O[ O Ote S9 V Zu0 \ O e tt H YNW ewe. J i. c h LL U ,. Y oorrn m n • eO~nrN N L • • ~ ~• HPPNn wln N h m n r K • O P 1 • ~i Y n• ~~ r r i z~ • O Hn ~h• ~M~ nn• •u. ~~• nw~ ~ O 1Z• i ~=i w1 i ~ Y Y ~ n ~W• •L• •2• n •K• •V• •O: 4 JPONNm WMNrTiNnM ewMnnn u W_ V YJ P N P J N Me N O m J 2 v~ M U M 6 N V1 sr h < t P \J \ 2s N ~ Wem hWhNW h W N o w n0\Y~C iJKIL LVm~J LL mN wwo> wao vn~n . w in w'\ KiNh VhO zu .a own.y VVOVLL W •Zn \Y2w\ MIHhW Vi HHwp ~ Y6\ ZfOVO \\2 _W JJILO JJJKw NOYN )Zi NIP mpen Nh Wm w Original Foor qua!;;y i e~ a xa3~^IC:I ~' ~ P ~ e's_ _ g ~ ~ ~ ES?i WAY aRXCie~; ~~ ~ e ~£~rs 3 • m i 7 e i e y.~'S F£ LS 6 b ~4g .^_~3A:~ £0 k 2 j S~ ml ~ R yk' B ~ • ski YR y I M nl: - + .. - -'~V' ~' b~ stdr°. K'.' SA I f C .~Y ~`~.` 36 ~° .-~ ~_ ~ 8B 9-~ F ~5 Cg :E~ S u C -_& ~ 9&88_A8'. a _ q 19 V _ . ~ ~ ~~S A ~ R:~ T ZI. S: ~r F ~ } ~ 5 S ~ ~ =s_ = s ^~'k ~ _a;Cs 'u ... - f-L~q 3 € :filY m ~3 ~ ~ - °S .- o~`_ _ ~ Re5 ~di:.%s~ Y _ ~ y ' d C __Y~C ~ ~ g~~ y Y E S~k2~.1~f ~ ~ YY .-. t f _ .. X ~ I~ .E 9 t _, '"- ---- - ms so. ..~.:.: ~ ~ :~ I E '. - 98~ ____'___S'icc °_~_:EeKE~RRF ~^ sA ~' S~°- e^? o 1C ^ I `a a$a?s`_a='s.== as 3s wins 3i ` I " i g"s 3?6$~s_sa's ~' ~ "s ~ ~R' ~ _53~ ~ ? ~i i x ~ , m ....~...., ,.., ....., a .. _ .. s.. ~ ___m ^-i ° ~ e~~Re RSR$A~~~ =~ ~ ~'~ ~~~~ 1C 8~ ~ 3 ~ m .. .~.. mF mm:m ~ ~! 888888858888 R 88 8 8 88 8 _SRF ~° F S 31, >i E~~~~~~~~~~~ S ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ YC~~ $ :I ~ tl~ 888888888888 R 8S 8 % 88 R Tj88C 8 % 8;' R ', 1gg,55 ~' a~o~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~a~ ~ ~ ~j Q~ ~F en 5~ R888S8888888 R 8S 8 8 88 8 CRaB _ R 8 _ ° AY ~~~ E~~~~~~~~~~~ E 8$ ~ ~ ~~ ~ C FA~_ - ~ Fsj e W ^ r u~ ~e~8 ":6GoCs>e _ aS SS - ~ !I _ -m ° :RSA = 1^. __ ~ ~ s~ eeo'eoeeooeoe ee 8e o&ee o e ~, ~ ~_ E % '6 ~ CC 3 p 156 N~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ °5 ~S~a~ ~Y '~ y _ ~ ~ yy q ^ ~ gg ~~ Y :::+~:i Sx^:Y Y ~ 9€Ei ig 5 ~y y ~ ~~~ X ~l^^t ~b,{{LY ~ ¢ ~ y y ~ yg 6 ~ bl~b~~~a~~.],~~ '~' N tl ...% Y W CZf 'o K 5 !k W~ Y y ~ ~ Y M ~~~' sav ° ° °° g ~ " ~ _ ~ y y. . ~ R „~ ~_ ~ r d 8 -r'~ .~CB~. .~ e CS888ok888%€= . 9. u88 g 8 ^ 8~ g8gg ~~888 ~~ F~ ~~ ~o, ~~ j B R Y Is° 8 mss , ~ . ~~ Y y~y %; g Y~„-' w _ ~~g ~ _ e 8 ~ _ 1! ~W ~~ ~o ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ e ~ k ~~ n o ~ ~~ Y~ 3 .. e Y G, -, ~ N,. .:1 f ~„r ~,,.y r Gr;~~;:,a i ~cr 4~"' tY ~z R R gSgE E8 EE dEdE i ,~.. .R. 'Jt EE ,y E~ ~ ~ 3 4~ ~ ~. i~ « xi`7 k$i tC ~ _ ~~ __- %8 ~ e i yJ i ' ~'s E ~'s{ys l~R~^.~ s ~°x $ ~ ~~ 3~e ~ ~T zei3~ E ~ 3' i ~~ ~~ ply ~ ~_ ~R ;F _~ ice' .. fY E 3I 6 • ~ ~ ~ y ~ 3 I Y IC ~' Y ~ S~ 8 8 8 8 8 >€ S ~ `• ~~ 5~sa ~~a ve ~i ~~' ~- ~~ a ~ ~~~~ °;i 'E c~> mm _~ a ~ ~ X' E C pr as a~~_ ~ ~~ ~v ~ ~ ~4'=~ ~~ ~:~: ~ ~ Sy k yyky~y -, ~~6a ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~BEX$ ~ E G ~ ~_ II ~ 5 ~ ~: '6 ~ b ~ ~ ~YS S .,.o% s z; LLs'E e s ~~ ~s ~ ~~s~e a ~ ~ ~a - CITY 13~ RANCHO CUCARfONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Susan Neely, Finance Officer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND FY 1990/91 APPROPRIATIONS Approve all 1990/91 budgetary adjustments for the General, Capital Projects and Special Revenue Funds. BACKGROUND Nhen the budget deve to pment process begins, staff is actually projecting estimated revenues and appropriations 14 to 16 months ahead of anticipated needs. to general, estimated revenues and appropriations have Deen adjusted to reflect a more realistic level of activity fn all funds. There has been no shift of estimated revenues and appropriations which digresses from the direction Council has requested of staff. Capital Improvement programs, as they are addressed, are approved as separate Council items throughout the year. The attached report submitted for your review indicates the increase or decrease in each account area for revenues and expenditures. The increase or decrease is determined by comparing the amended figures to those originall~~ adopted by the City Council in the budget. Respectfully submitted, Susan Neely Finance Officer SN/rs attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1890 = 104,887 ~ CO ~ DE ESCfVPT10N ACTUAL 7~N/E FISCAL VENT 19!0.1900 B0001LnED IaEVFPNIE FECAL YEAR 1990-1991 fEV19Ep REvENUE ESTIMATE 1990-1991 (1) TAIOES 13900 loan Ptapsry Tax-GY sstsr40 1,757,056 2,179,700 2,216,310 19900 ' t00D PmpNry Taft•C,IV unscrasd 104,312 201,000 727,000 1 00 10q Pran Tmt•P/Y aseitnMC q,OW N,3pp 0/,580 13900 1080 Propnty Tax • ~ 30,190 0 40,570 13900 1056 BuppMnrxalTaus 107,759 63,300 101,140 13000 1078 UrMYry Tax 52,3 74,400 50,000 13900 1100 9alriUaa Taoua 4,990,010 4085,250 5 700 000 13000 1166 TtanalatM peptPsnOy Taft 4,N5 a,5oo , , 5,690 13000 1190 A~srau Tax ?2,756 15,000 16 500 13900 1600 Pmpsrry TrirNrTax 62P,~2 4m~O0D , ~~ 13001 4660 FraMYas FM • f9n i EYCtrk 963,417 990,900 1 000 650 13901 46651 FwfxlYas FM-flasi01n5a1 R15as 310,436 273,610 . , 216 150 1.9001 4662 FmtlWS FM•CamaxOW RMus 322,169 276,92D . 769A60 13001 4663 FlatdYas FSS-Cetls Tll 226,559 x62,370 3Zi,300 ToW T ~s 0 9 0 10 /3 - ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Csnlua 1090 = 101,887 ACCOUNT Aqua R>:VENUE FI@CAL YEAR suoc9E~ED REVENUE FOIC'a1L YEAR REVISED REVENUE EBTIMA9E CO DE DESCAIP710N 1960 - 7900 1090.7901 1900.1991 (2f uCENaES a PE'IWRB 1a9oo z9oo 8~aY11nLIonrN etsrai 918,000 91s,a9o 13991 2220 BkycM Llorws 291 25D 250 fa9D/ 2z9o &fOdlq P«mNS 1,fetsle 2.OIOd00 1,036,810 f a991 2300 O9rr Lk1nw a Pllmlb 9,677 eA00 6,970 To n P 1 177 7 (3) FI/E8 i FORFETI9 13901 2190 ViYYCA COd~ FY1N X1.068 219.770 296.950 1.9001 3160 Ci1r11nI O1dnno0FM0 2/,528 23,Oq 2D,900 1.9001 3161 PIIW CoA1 fkIN 0 1,600 0 1.9001 3162 PIN ~p9h FM 3.066 0 1,000 To iR a F /3- 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Canaua 1890 ~ 104,887 ACC CO OUNT DE EBCPMPlK1N ACTUAL faEtiE-4UE Faif:AL YEM tae6-1000 BUOffiflED IE4EMIE Ft6CN.YEAR 1960.1661 P£VIBED Fk11ENUE ESTBiAATf 1660.1681 (4) ML4CELLANEOUB 13901 4600 RM+b 8 Lwr 1 100 0 1.7001 4600 k111fNt Esmaps 0 400,000 416,000 1.7001 4610 • k1lMlllt E6mY+~ RS FDA Laa1 0 3mA0D 3m,Om 13901 79fo swaPrYrWMYMfW e1,o61 m.6+o seam 13901 79so a.u,mw lwm canto. 162 300 3m 13901 862D o6w lwn. 7,847 fo~o 40270 13007 8621 9ros9 CWms CR Fine FMS 0 0 0 1.7001 8622 8m/a Cairo pt 9fr81fs FM 0 0 0 13601 8740 BSfsaMashkrrytEgWpnwa 1,174 0 47,320 13601 e780 SS1S a Is+d o 0 0 13801 8811 Panay 6,661 0 2D,7m 13601 8613 CamSaYry VOYSM6+y RM.yGL Prop. 0 600 8m f39o1 e623 RS1yeahM M6Misl n 3m o t39o1 es24 rareycael. MSYW • VNYM Paper o 200 1m tool ~ >a /0 440 i~- ~ CITY ©F RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1890 = 104,BW ACCOUNT ACIVAL REVENUE FISCAL YEAR BUDC~ZIJ7 REbENUE FiBGAI YEAR REVISED fkIENUE EST9MTE CODE DESCRIFIION 7969.1990 1990.7991 1990 -1901 (5j INTERGOVERNMENTAL 13900 5230 Motor VNNON h Liw 3,737,175 4,2t7,360 4,217,380 1 7900 5250 HartuowtNrt Propary TaK RaaN 21,710 7,500 36,000 13900 5251 Govt Ooh Spat. SuttwltlOn 0 0 0 13900 5330 Tra9ar COaeh h Uau • A82001 39.009 5,500 11,200 73907 5339 06 tiigttway licatlr Faq 1,7&t 2,200 910 13900 5390 Ciyaratm Tta 1!8,035 189,000 170,880 7atal lntar Otrommsntal T71 4 680 41fib (8) CHMGEB FOR BERVICEB 13901 1185 Filpar PrYa F1aa 10,2W 5,000 11,620 13901 1200 DARE. PmQtn RIY110uraarllar9 0 60.000 51„510 13807 1~1 Chdoaa Proprtl 0 0 5,370 13901 7212 Juw1Y VWYrtoa 0 0 980 13901 2100 CanAhSr FaM r ~ 13901 3166 Fsfaa AYrm F i 0 0 1,150 73957 7260 PIvlCtrckpaaa re,9D6 1,17e,69o 359,700 7.7801 7780 PI~rWtp FaN 17{2,311 266,000 96,160 13901 7290 EnpYtaarkp Faaa 1,116,925 2,1W,000 1,107,020 Total Char as for SafVlCai 3711:!0 000 1671170 l3- ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCaA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Csnwa t990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT CODE EBCiLPTiON ACiti/1L fEVE6AlE F05GAL YEAR 1988-1980 BUDC~TED Irc11EWlJTe FAlCJ1L YEAR 199D-1881 fE1rIBED IEyEPNJE 88T8AAlE 1980.1001 m oTitERa t3W2 9001 Trarwu In 9 o tw,aao 1 'i999 eszz NafAbYO RNmm~~rs6rtrrM6 73,606 876.OOD Ts,000 13999 e6zi Atrrrrn'yrtt OiMrkl R01nMtrwrrK 12{.701 60,080 316,Y~ t389D 8624 • R~inhrrarrwk From RDA o 0 3,312,900 1399D 8625 • R6YrlhrrarrrrM From Fin D9q. 0 0 83,31D 13099 8630 ReYMrnnrrrrt From Orin FUMY 1,463,410 9,304,210 2390.5i8D 1~ 2000 OYUr FY1/rtlrp BdlfaM 0 0 0 TOUT t 1 0 •Naw acaouu rKmhert m rprraYly Ofdc •w6Ib11164116cIM IYCaI y..1990i1. /3- ~ CITY OF RANCH© CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE ~. POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cansua 1990 = 104,887 ACTUAL BUDGETED FfVISeD fitHE/4Ut F `'1:PN,~ FEYENUE ACCOUNT F19CM. YFJiFi F18CAL YEAR ESfIMA~e cope Desc~uvnoN 1999.1900 iW0-1981 1990-1991 F1a{n~ 1 5~1 Flees 41.286 91.881 0 F1B{m W 1 7 9111 6 11tl/Cal lYa~a 7801 5691 RaimhunementalCal Trap 5,144 7„287 O gllla F1Bg11CWaalllallt .9Y1 Ballfa1a110 Dana 1 5991 ReimhwsamenyCarny O1 S.B. 48,531 7,823 9001 TrarMais In 0 /3- F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 ACTUAL BUDGETED TEVISED REVENUE REVENUE FEVENUE ACCOUNT FISCAL YEAR FIBf.AL YEAA ESTIMATE CODE OE9CRIPTN)N 1880 -1980 1990.1991 1980.1991 Ciao Talc 2107 513D Case Tat 2107 819,108 998,000 1,100,000 4600 Inlelset EaminOe 24,827 79,700 9001 Tranelafe In 0 0 5150 C18e Tmc 2107.5 0 0 9(101 hamfele 61 0 0 o ae 19A3 T/UC 2105 - PFIOP 111 103900 5140 Oaf Tat 2105 -plop 111 205,758 170,Ofp 10.9001 4600 klOflell Ettrtwnpe 0 0 alt l3as tnc 2108.21075 13900 4600 Mteaset Eamirlpe 81,705 21,000 4601 Lien 4ttolne 0 0 5110 3taze f3ea TaK-2106 4(12,066 417,110 5150 Sbne Caae Tmt -2107.5 10,000 10,000 113801 7781 In Lieu Fea 0 0 13802 9001 Trwrolat h 0 0 o ae /~ r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE ' POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,097 ACTON. BLIDCCaEIED REVISED iiEVENUE iEVENUE REVENUE ACCOUNT FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATE CODE DESCRIPTION 1999.1990 1990 -1981 1990 -1991 98325/iDA ART.B I 123900 4900 Interest Eartrgs 148,392 58,590 123900 5170 Oas Seles Tax 1,207,105 %4,000 915,000! 123992 9001 Trenslers M 0 123989 8571 Non-AbeOetl R9imbur99rti9nh 0 ~ 33901 RecreW 7710 ial Servic9a RecreWion Foes 430,290 531,490 599,672 133992 9001 Trafsfersh 0 SB 900 15 9900 46W kl6erert EinYps 0 0 15.9800 5186 SsCllan 2118 8 8 M Nlocatlan 0 0 153892 9001 Twnebrs h 0 0 /~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE ` POPULATION ESTIMATES; Cenaua 1880 = 104,887 ACCOUNT ACTUAL REVENUE F15CAL YEAR BUDaEIED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR REVISED REVENUE ESTIMATE CODE DESCRIPTION 1999.1880 1980 -1981 1900.1891 PadaaUiafl OonltMAkM 9 83800 518D PetlagAeNBlcycb SWawaMa 0 0 53801 IBOD Iniaiart EartYrtya 0 0 63882 9001 Tranakfs MI 0 0 FAU SEC.209 73900 6750 FeOarW Oranb 0 8524 OOwr RBYMIraamaigs 0 0 DraYlapa FacWtNyEthrnWa 93901 7456 30om1 OrWn Feaa 27,980 9.9882 9001 Tlarl4Mf 41 0 /.7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE t POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT ACTUAL REVENUE F13CAL VElVi BUDOFIED ib'VENUf FISCAL YEAR REVISED REVENUE ESTIMATE CO DE DESCRIPTION 1080.1000 1000.1991 1900-1991 Park WvelOprrrrl 1 4600 kaeraet EamYlpa 781,2W 708,400 7730 Park DewbpRaaw Few 1,3ii,634 2.886,860 7731 TMra Vkea Park Dewbprtrs 0 0 7734 R C Via sewer Lino Aocns 0 0 7735 eorrofihutlat born RDA 0 0 9001 Trensiars kt 0 0 3901 Bsaul 4800 ~0n kNeree[Eemtpe 4,40D o 13001 7441 DevNOper'e Paitlclpa0m 0 0 13907 7780 Beaud6calbn Fan 6?8,110 860,000 158,4BD 3901. 7781 H Lkar Fen 378.110 0 3ao1 7762 caraWUkalhald 7z,s29 0 13901 7764 Loan rapay/nerM o 0 1.9892 9901 TraleMra n o 0 /~ ~ V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE '~ POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 10a,B87 ACR1A1. REIIEFMIE SUODEIED fF/E74UE ~O REVENUE ACCOUNT fISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATE CO DE DESCRIPTION 1999-1990 1990.1991 1990-i991 X01 4600 WvNOpnlNrt InoalwtErrlilpe 1a,se6 40,000 4901 LMn klcolro 0 7430 Syaoeme Fees 2U7,870 2,20D,000 X7,537 7440 Racarer9blB Syaleeta Fees 0 7x41 DeveWpeYS Partldallan 0 7x42 Sale d L]IItl 0 7736 ConMhidon hOm RDA 0 7791 In Lieu Fses 0 7792 In Lieu FeWMalDora~1 0 7753 CanaWiNon h Aitl 108,860 X892 9001 TrAWenN 0 DraYlape Fed9tl~N0irwal CNy i 1 7490 Startn DreY1 Fw 309,419 860,000 145,142 1 7M1 De~NOpls pertlCipollal 0 1 4600 hYlet Eemtlpa 0 7,000 1 T/36 Coigihutld1lf001 RDA 0 9001 harglre h 0 d3- ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVEN~1 _E POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 7980 = 104,387 ACCOUNT AC7UAL REVENUE F190ALVFJIR BUDGETED f6VElAlE FIS'CAI YEAR RTYI9ED REVENUE E9TOAAlE CODE DESCRIPTION 1980.1900 1900 - 7001 5990 - I9Bi Federal AW Urban 8750 Federal Hf~wO/ (9renra 0 659,:K1t 6751 ArdRbWd Aweaie (CCWD) 0 0 8524 Otlrer ReimCwa 133,888 0 43992 9001 Trerglers In 0 0 0 R.TBary Grant Beryl Park 0 0 Old Town Padt 0 0 GYanb - CDBO 1 5880 0080 Rekndraemema 903,342 433,000 400,154 1 SBB1 ProRan 81conM 0 0 0 o.~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC)NGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1980 = 101,887 P V ACCOUtR IiEVEtiUE F18CAL YEM E ErRIE f19CAL YEAR PbVENUE ES'T1MAlE CODE C58CRIPTION Y9e9.1990 1980-1991 1910-1991 Park Bond Cirarrt - 1911 1 Sees Park Band [3ra9! 1981 309,730 0 Hk><orical fianl 1 5000 NWak~I CiraM Rakndraanarb 0 0 0 i I Park OorW Act -1900 I '~~ 1.9801 sees Pals Baa c3rad f 1900 0 o /3- ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Ceneua 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT ACTUAL iEVEWUE FI9CAL YEM BtiDTBiIED IEVEPIIE FI9CJIL YEAR PENBED 18:VEDNJE ESTIMATE CODE DE8CPoPTION 1999-1990 1990-1991 1990.1991 MaWt9 I - Ttaupattatlon RavMMM X900 Maaraa I Aontars 57,399 860,000 /,008,197 88 140 ('Pant 5680 SB 140 Caant NwooaK 0 1,752,!21 ,f3-iV CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE ` POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT AC7VAI. REVENUE F4SC.4L YEAR BU013E'IED REVENUE FISCAL YEAR REVISED Re'tiENUE ESTIMATE '~ CO DE DESf2iIP710N 1989-1990 1990.1981 1990.1991 Land MaNt Dat I1 aanaral 1 1020 Pruperq TaK-C/Y Boated 184,467 914,890 292,000 1040 Property Tao-P/Y Soaped 8,494 8,530 8,S2D~ 4600 InEBieY EamYlpt 37,148 17,910 2D,000 9001 Trar+~a k1 0 0 0 1 1090 Penelry a 4imreat 1,002 0 460 0 LaM MaiA Dot an Vkferie 17901 f0~ PrcpNy Tao-C/Y Bsnnad 733,398 773,990 821,430 1010 Property Taa-P/Y geared 13,464 8,310 8,440 4600 InM+sal EalMige 103.499 20,000 57.000 +aeo PwgMyaeeafeat 2999 0 1,7D0 13992 9001 TraM1Yt h 0 0 0 l3- 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,987 ACTUAL SUDDETED iiE1ASED REVENUE FEVENUE iEVENUE ACCOUNT FISCAL VEM FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATE CODE DESCRIPTION 19~ -1900 1890 -1991 1990.1901 L.arrd Maim Dat !9 HYSSOP 3801 1020 Property Tax•C/Y Secured 7,778 1,900 88,170 10b Property Tax - P/Y Secured 200 100 0 4600 Interest Ean1Y1D! S,S7B 0 2,000 1060 Penalty 3 krtrefre9t 100 0 0 3992 9001 Traf9lers kr 0 0 0 0 Land Maim Dal •4 Terra Vfsta 1 1020 Property Tax-C/Y Severed 725,401 317,OOD 162,47D 1000 Properly Tax-P/Y Secuured 2,772 1,OOD 950 4800 InOtreat EanrtrP 80,231 1$000 78240 1080 Perra9y 5 h0areat 535 0 200 9001 TrerWaatn 0 0 0 Lard Maid Dort iS Td Td 1 1020 Praperry Talc - C/Y Secured 4,870 4,300 3,080 10q Property Tax - P/V Sewed 0 2D0 0 4600 lnlereet EamerOe 1,909 100 870 1080 Perre9y 8lnlrerreal 0 0 0 9007 Traralas h 0 0 0 0 /3- /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Csnsus 1990 ~ 104,987 ACCOUNT ACRIAL FEVENIIE P19CAL 7F.M 8UDC1bZED IEVE14lE F18td1L YEAH FEVIBED iiE1lENUE ESTIMATE CODE OESCPoPTION 1089.1990 1990.1991 1990.1991 Land Maht Ott M Cuyn Cann 1 102D Propwry Tix-C/Y BecaaO 711.024 225,000 161,800 1010 Propnly Ttt-P/V 81Ca1d 4A79 2,OOD 2,440 Iem he4r141EaIWg4 az.7oo aoao w,s9o 108D Pena87a hW11t 764 0 400 9001 Tra~aa h 0 0 0 0 LanO MaiM Dat •9B Yglns 1 tO9D PrOpMy TSC•CJY 31arW 114.680 171,000 8{,120 tOq Pmpwly Tsc-P/Y 8wand 924 1,000 b Ieoo hrnrl EamYlpi zae9 s,aoo 1,250 laeo PMw9y a hM111 11 0 0 9ao1 rra.uro h o 0 0 /3- C~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E$JIMATED REVENUE '' POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT CODE EBCRiT10N ACTUAL FEVENUE FISCAL YFM 1999.1990 BUDGETED FEVFiNUE FIBCdL YEM 1990.1991 iEV18E0 PEVENIIE ESTIMATE 199D • 1991 Land MaYd Drt •7 73901 1020 Property Tats • C/V 8eorrad O 55,000 ?5,790 1040 Prop9ny T®t-P/V 8araxad 0 0 O foeo PenaAy b trltaw o tao0 0 1900 NlOerast EaKgs 0 1,000 170 73992 9001 Trangara k1 0 0 0 O Land MaYd Dot !8 1 10211 Property Tmc-C'/Y Sscaed 5,700 5,700 5,500 1010 properly Tax • P/Y 9wvsd 0 0 0 1050 Parldry 8 YleraR 750 750 0 IS00 ktkreat F•antMpa 460 450 50 9001 TralMan k1 0 0 0 /3-~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE ` POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 ACTUAL iENENUE 9Wt5FTED REVENUE REVISED REVENUE ACCOUNT F18CAL MEAN FISCAL VEAN EBTN~MTE CODE OESCRIPIION 19BD -1990 199D -1991 1910 -1091 l.idt8np Dbt !1 AyOeriY 1 1090 Property Tmr-C/V 9eaaed 1D,021 153,080 147,840 1040 PrOpwty TBK•P/Y Beamed 2,788 3,500 1,100 4600 kllereet Earnirpe 11,M1 3,800 S,DO 1080 Penalty d klteraet 48) 0 180 9001 Traielers h 0 0 0 LIy1tYq Dbt I2 RpfdrdW 1 1020 Property Tmt-C/V Sewed 90,3 118,390 83,800 1040 Property Tat - P/V 3eaeed 4,402 3,800 1,350 4600 ktlaraet Eanttge 17,118 3,960 7,160 1060 P4nalty d InMreet 846 0 850 9001 TtarlMMe h 0 0 0 ~r~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cansua 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT ACiVJ1L IEVENUE FISCAL YEAR BUOfE7ED f'aFVVENUE F03CAL VFAR FEUBED fEVENUE EBT9AATE CODE DESCRIPTION 1999.1090 1090.1001 1090.1091 LI~tYp DM i9 Vktwitt ~BOt 1070 Pfopany Tat-ClY Stldratl 72,W9 87,100 50,370 1040 Propary Tat-P/V Bswed 1,880 1,300 800 1600 I111BfYl1l EartYtgtt 10,831 4,350 4,130 1080 Pa1111y 8 hteraet 379 0 110 3892 9001 TrenMNa h 0 0 0 LI~tYg DW i4 Ttlrra Vbtt• 1 1070 Prolany Tac-GY9oa88d 57,8.2 70,100 1&1,710 1010 Ptvprly Tat-PN 3wrr0 808 100 500 1900 hMMtEamirps 1310 3,170 8,860 1090 PwltyB hWwt 125 0 110 8001 TralMws h 0 0 Q i3 - r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1980 = 104,887 ACCOUNT ACRIAL REVENUE FOAL YEAR BUOfflm REM3IUE F19CALYEAR REYL4F.D REM?NUE E871MATE CODE DESCRIPTION 1980 -1990 1000 - t901 1900.1991 UphtlnO Oht Ia Caryn Comm 1 1020 Pmparty Tact-C/Y Sagaad 30,5'A 23,42D 18,900 !010 Proparry Tax-P/YSwnd 1,036 750 440 4600 kxwett Eamirga 8,300 1,800 3,440 !ago ~b a Inmreu o 0 70 9001 Tranalers In 0 0 0 lJyt9rp Dbt i6 YtduWial Ana 1 1010 Pt0(7Nly 7mt • CJY S~taaM 8,394 12,700 11,390 1040 Prapay TSC-P/Y 94aa90 0 960 20 4600 hsfrBat Eamiga 1,372 30 720 1050 Pana6y a InMNI 0 0 0 9001 Tradus In 0 0 0 l3 -!/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E TIMATED REVENUE '- POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT ACIUAL REVENUE F93CAL YEAR BIH7f~lED REVENUE FISCAL YEM fiE1l19ED REVEI4UE EB'i1MAlE CODE DE&CRIPIION 1999.1900 1900.1801 1990 -1991 1Jd19fq Dbt I7 13001 1020 PropMyTsc-ClY SacurW 0 0 0 1010 Pmparry Tax-PM 91cuW 0 0 0 4900 kilarsat EamYga 0 0 0 1000 Pena9y 8 k0ar~a1 0 0 0 13892 9001 Traule~a M 0 0 0 0 LIp1~lYq Dhl I9 3907 1020 Proparry Ta¢-C/V BaaaW 0 0 0 1010 PrOpnty Tax-P/Y 9aaxad 0 0 0 4000 hMaa[ Eamtga 0 0 0 1090 PwBy 8 YOaaat 3992 9001 7riulMa h 0 0 0 0 0 0 i3-v CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 7090 = 104,&&7 ACCOUNT CODE E9CRIPTON NCTUAI. REVENUE F19CAI.VEAR 1989 -1990 BUDC~ti1ED fEVENUE FIHCAL YEAR 1990 -1091 REVISED REVENUE E3TMMTE 1980 -1991 AD 8&2 EtlwsyIMVN1~4aM CFD 53901 460D hkiWt EarV~gs 3,542 0 0 79W Bond Procwds 0 0 0 &520 Otlier Rayers+s 0 0 0 5-3992 9001 Trand«s h 0 0 0 /3- !~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 104,887 ACTUAL BUDGETED REVISED REVENUE fEVENUE iE~ENUE ACCOUNT F13CN. MEAN FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATE CO DE DESCRIPTION 19BD-1990 1980.1991 1990-1991 AD 88.1 RetlMptlort 1 IO:YI Property Tatt-C/Y 9euxetl 188,140 0 210,470 1 tOW Property Tax-P/Y Secured S78 0 600 1 1080 Penally 6 ki0erest 0 0 0 1 4800 hlereat Eaminys 0 0 0 1 4801 MdereM - Early Rederttplbrl 0 0 0 1 7906 Print:ipW • Early Redemptlon 0 0 0 9001 TranelBri M 0 0 0 0 AD 88-2 RedenlptlOn 1 tOZD PropNly Tax • C/Y Sectxea 0 0 5,000 1010 Property Tax • P/Y 8ecued 0 0 0 1080 PMIYIy 61'IMeet 0 0 0 4600 tlMeet Eemilpe 0 0 0 7901 Rmerw Re~lrerrxinb 0 0 0 9001 Tranelen h 0 0 0 /.~-~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STIMATED REVENUE °~ POPULATION ESTIMATES: C9naua 1990 = tOs,997 ACCOUNT CODE ESCPoPTION ACTUAL PEIIENUE FISCAL YEJW 1999.1990 BULIDETED Pk4ENIlE F{9CAL YEAR 1990.1991 FEVIBED IEVENUE E5T9A4TE 1990.1997 ADBr-2 Alb Lome q~rrW 1 4600 kltBrBM Eamigs 21,079 0 5,000 7900 9ClM PrOCeWa 0 0 0 6570 09wi PivNaN 0 0 0 9001 TranalBis In 0 0 0 /3-~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STIMATED EVENUE "' POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 ACTUAL REVEN BUDOEIED EYED IE REYI9ED REVENUE ACCOUNT UE FISCAL YEAR N P F~.YEAR E9T5aATE CODE DE3CWPTION 19BD-199D 1990.1991 1990.1991 AD 84-2 ReArllplWn 13001 1020 Property Tat-Cry Seaeetl 158,180 184,890 134,510 1040 Properly Tat • PN Setwled 10,500 6,000 8,460 toeo Pauly a almree< 7,m 9 1,4zo 4800 N11BtYelEanttpe 14,818 0 7,100 1801 kllersel- Eay ReOaltpUon 0 0 0 7805 Pnc~ipW - Eay RetlarplWn 0 0 0 13982 9001 Trafaho h 0 0 0 AO 84.2 RMe1va 3001 4600 Mlaleet Eanilpt ?5,895 15,350 16,860 7901 ReeerN Ret~errlaln 0 0 0 3992 9001 TrarrMs h 0 0 0 0 ~.~-z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 104,887 ACCd1NT ACTUAL iEVEMUE FISCG4L YEM BUDDETED IEVENUE Ft9CAL YEM D FEVETHIE ESTIMATE CODE DESCRIPTION 1988.1880 1990.1991 1880.1991 AD 82-1 8th SUest M1WthiW 1 4800 IrMateal Eamitpa 55.998 0 31,890 9001 Tratstera kt 0 0 0 AD 84-1 Dtry Ctwk 1 4600 hltwap E4trtkp4 724,341 180,870 1?2,430 1 85~ OtltN tMAfal4 0 0 0 9001 TrantMSn N 0 0 0 0 /3- f~fj CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 ACCOUNT CODE ES(XiIPT10N ACTUAL fE4E14UE FI9CAI. YEAR 1999-1990 BUDOESED iEVE745E F18CAL YEAR 1990.1901 iENBED iEVENUE EST9IATE 1990.1901 AD 84-1 IYAanrD5500 3901 lofio Pnalty a lnbreat 12,868 0 1,78D 3001 t07D Property Taz-CN Saand 1,1701,5/9 90A,09D 1,080,360 1040 Property Taa • P/y Saarad 33,695 68,010 5,480 4900 knawREarnapa 0 294,51D 0 4501 hlareW - Early 0 0 0 7905 PrY,cipW•EWy RetWn(tlon 0 0 0 7906 Ceno9anod Cap9al-FDA 862,709 1,198,000 0 7907 Pr4'Pray3pctal Tabaa 0 0 0 0621 Lon 9"ern FDA 0 0 0 3092 9001 TranlMa h 0 0 0 /3-~IB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 104,887 ACRIAL (>EV BUOC;EIIED D ACCOUNT ENUE FISCAL YEAR FE~ENUE FISCAL VE/Yi iEVENUE ESTIMATE CODE OESCNPTION 19BD -1990 1990.1991 1980 -1991 AD PD 85 He~itaps 1 4000 Int9teal Earrurgs 8,286 0 12000 1 7900 BOM Proceeds 0 0 0 9001 Trams h O 0 0 AD PD 88 Red H91 1 460D Nlenet EartYrps 19,394 0 15,700 1 7900 Bond Prawd 0 0 0 9001 Tfi141N1 N 0 0 0 /3-~1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Ceneue +990 a 104,887 ACTUAL BUDOEIED TEVIBED iFVEWUE I~VEPNIE iEVENUE ACCOUNT FIBCN-YEM ftBCAL YFJVi E5TiMATE CODE DESCRIPTWN 1988.1990 1990-1991 1990-+991 AD PD 86 P/•dullplbn 1 102D Properly Tsr - GV Secteed +,008,891 +,047,S2D 891,220 10x0 Property Tmt-P/Y 3eaeetl 23,721 36,740 16,800 4800 hlerBel EamYpe 0 7,730 0 4601 Inlereet-EeAy gedenplbn 0 0 0 79(16 Prlndpel -Early RederrlptlOn 0 0 0 +aeo Penally a rrnreu 6,36+ o a96o 900+ Trenl+Bre kl 0 0 0 AD PD B6 AeeerM 13901 4800 YrMM[EemYlpe 46,606 38,380 36,640 7901 Neeerve Requkerlleflb 0 0 0 1:1992 9001 Traudre h 0 0 0 i.~-A~ CITY OF RANCHO CUGAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Cenaua 1990 = 104,887 ACTUAL REVENtE BUDGETED REVENUE REVISED REVENUE ACCOUMf FISCAL YEAR F19CAL YEAR ESTIMATE CODE DESCRIPTION 1980 -1990 190D • 1991 1990.1091 AD 841 Raserw 3901 4600 Intelsat Eemyga 78,787 73,600 0 3992 9001 Trentlera kl 0 0 0 0 AD 82-1 ReOemptlort 1 1020 Property Tmc•CIY Seraasd 756,272 790,190 740,760 1010 PtopMly Tao-P/Y 8eound ?8,874 61,BBp 9,290 4600 MlereN EamYtq 131,638 46,860 36,840 4601 bdereet • Early Redwnptisn 0 0 120 7906 PrtnO'pel • Eery Redxrptbn 0 0 3,140 67eo sar a rand o 0 0 9001 rralwrs n o 0 0 1 laso Pena6y a h0ersat 6,494 0 2.200 0 ~J ~/f G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE ` POPULATION ESTIMATES; Census 1990 = 101,881 ACCOUHf CODE E3CRIPTION ACTUAL REVENUE F16CA1. YEAR 1999-1990 Bl10fdETED IEVEPAJE FISC/V. YEAR 1990-1991 REVreED REVENUE ESiiMATE 1990.1991 AD 82-7 Rprv~ 1 Ifi00 kAerlY Eanilpr 91,167 51,100 55,000 7901 R~~Yrw RegWnmenb 0 0 0 9001 TrafMars h 0 0 0 /~~ ~~ CIfiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE POPULATION ESTIMATES: Census 1990 = 101,887 ACCOUNT CODE ESCRW?ION ACRlAL REVENUE F19CAL YEAR 1989.1990 lt~IED REVENUE FlBCAI.YEAR 1990.1991 RENBED iEVENUE E3T6AATE 1990.1991 AD 86.2 R/C DraM1A8a W Wlol 1 160o htare~t ean~ 2x,ra a ztooo ~ r9ro eaw Proceaw o 0 0 i a:s2o otlirRavawr o o a 9001 T~aMp71n 0 0 0 /3-Ay CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED REVENUE •~ POPULATION ESTIMATES: Canaua 1990 = 104,587 ACTUAL BUDOEIED REVISED REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE ACCOUNT F{SCA1. YEAR FIBCAL YEAR ESTUMTE C/00E DESCRIPTION 1989.19BD 1990.1991 1990-iWt AO 86.2 Redwnp0an 1 1021 Properly Tart-CJy Seared 216,129 208,170 170,290 1010 Properly Tart - PIY Secured 2),418 12,78D 2,270 4600 krtermt EamYTga 14,8 45,021 14,950 4601 krtereft-Early Redenrp0at 792 1,560 360 7905 PdnCipal -Early Redemptlan 12,840 34,670 8,130 1060 Penally 8 kaereY 3,716 0 370 7902 Reda01p9on RegrMement 0 0 0 9001 Trartders In 0 0 0 0 AD 88-2 RuNVa 3901 4600 Inlaraal Eami7pa 5.000 13,400 7901 Referw Regiamenh 0 0 3882 9001 Tmlws In 0 0 ~.~-~y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ~. ioeono ,noon, looonl ~c7w~oaa ~coP7® ES11MA7FD ti!10 couwc6. iii1a11ao 811UWE8 30MD aeeo a,660 1i„a,e6o eaa~r7e 6,760 oaao o,7eo ,i11o23ao E.rea. 2,MD o ~ ti1103/00 VF18 A~lNp6 12,060 16,200 10,2aD 111103300 70 1,060 170 1i1103Y00 80P6NTION6 7A70 3.260 S,68D 1i11Q 9Y00 L1~B6JTV 2p 230 210 1/1100023 6E3NICES 2,26D 3,000 1,000 11110 TiDTAL• 60,000 63,400 66:100 ,1122 11M111[[•Bi 1i122•ttoo 8A1JWE6 266,270 36$660 316.470 1i12z-,oao easrts o1,1ao 12e,eoo 110,410 11122a1a0 Vk1ah~7M1C18 zl.aeo 13p60 laoeo 111223300 1,~Op 6,600 4,36D ,i,223o0o aanew7iar16 s,6eo o,w6 v,a,o 111223031 MMIIE1~WiCF 190 $660 2,880 111223o6e 3,620 3,76D 3,760 111223oeo t~eu7r eo ~ ow 1i12Z-0o28 Z8 63,OOD Sa,14D 66,1a ti122.70N KEOUP6@R 2A60 6,660 6,070 tit?2 TO7K: 46Y,710 611,160 626,010 /3- Al CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ,,. 1989/90 /99NY1 1990/91 Ac3LNLOwa ADOPI® FSi8A4T5~ i accaiur rx7L19s~ o~cpvnoN ~ ®~ eimEr owenmsaEs 11129 &1iETY 117233100 tb. i ~n+ci o 2,900 290 111233300 0 300 0 111233900 . i OPBMflONB 0 600 350 111233965 0 0 0 111233950 LIABp.RY 0 0 0 71123$OZ0 SAMCEB 0 0 0 11123 TOTAL: 0 $700 570 11125 P11BA4E09E86 1/1251700 BM/WE8 118,20D 147.410 145,73D 111251300 $480 3,600 1,650 111251900 BE~7T8 10,610 31 A00 62,050 111263100 i11il~YE3. 16,270 9.000 9,000 11126390D 1,N0 2d00 2.500 111263900 •OPE37AlI0N3 29,13D 31,960 37,950 711263901 MM81TB44N~"E 5,490 2.60D 2.500 111259965 9NSBCti110P10 160 690 690 11125.3980 114s8lIY 8p 1A60 7,060 111256020 .VWIB7EiBA0VAL 13,77'0 26,000 0 1/1255025 8f1iY1GF.8 31,760 ?x,490 26,490 1112670M AL f.70'B~Of11~S 5,650 3,000 0 11125 TOTAL' 269,990 30{,000 278,430 /3-A.T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 19egN0 1990A11 199QN1 AC7WLEf>d•• ADOPT® E9TIMA7ED AOCOUNTrx»n9e1 oESCawnorl e1cu11®PYE auooEr ~~elortuaEs 14128 C187C 141261100 88l/V~7s 89,980 132,810 19&410 141261300 AN7TNE PAYROLL 0 10,000 8,800 141261900 BB6IT8 12,830 48,4 48,700 141269tao vriaLlffn4cis a99o 9A00 1,440 14128+'190D 300 900 80 1-~1263Y00 iOP6N71.'1!!B 9~AED 67,i/0 41,490 1.41283980 8~B8Cf~RONB 49D 480 0 1-r126.~80 UALM.JT~ 1,8~ 1~0 1,200 1-1126002! 861111CES 78,880 86,M0 44,970 141267041 ALF~B~QI7URE8 0 18,900 19,190 1412DTV7Al' 27l,CA 320.140 290,20D 1112! .AGIENOY ADYW. 14127.1100 BAMiE9 0 181,890 179,Sb 14127-1900 BB+EFITS 0 89,880 02.810 14127410 89NME8 0 0 0 141277L7fAL' 0 2tat9o 242,980 /3-Ax CITY OE RANtrHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 198W911 1990A1 199091 ACIlL1L D0'a ADOP'1H1 Es79AA7~ accourrrNUtie~ 14150 THE sEaulcEB 111541100 SiAlARE9 9a/40 174,33D 131,390 111541200 80 300 0 111541300 ART-7MiE SMAFEB 0 0 0 111641900 861vff7T9 32.310 31,190 4a090 111303100 09.aM819699 3,730 4,300 1,300 11150:130D ao~ 4,600 3.1ao 11150 19 0 0 i0P6L17I0NS 1,730 3.100 1,8W 111503953 a8lS8CAP00N3 360 770 300 111501930 UA9aJ1E8 490 400 490 1-4154 y S 37,1 13A00 16,330 111547011 AL oa e5o 0 0 11150 To7w ms2o 233,OBD 200,950 11151 11131.1100 3AlAlEB 220A10 377,330 341,730 1-4131-1200 1,410 1,000 4,0.90 11131.1300 ,4R 7ME VAVROIl 0 1,000 0 11131.1900 !88118 107,030 132,150 119,010 141313100 VBaM~19398 1,110 3,700 3,200 1.41613300 1,39D 3,900 2,770 11/311900 a0P6MT10N8 32,800 31,990 23,390 111313933 a 31~8C13P110P18 240 1,100 970 111313930 lJAB(RY 1,340 1,410 1,410 11/6/41024 36#IC68 148,070 109,380 179,710 11161-7011 EOl3PI8/f 9,330 0.000 6,000 11131 Ta'TAL• 529,630 333,3tl 333,1 /3-g,L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E TIMAT~D~XPENDITURES t909N0 t990Nt t990At acco7rrrNUneeat o~77oN a~®~ 37~Ix7Er ~ 7rts1 ucema+o t.atsx-nao •^~•~~wPS ra.~+o tat,tao iot.aso tr152-1100 PAMdl 3U 0 40 tat62-1300 fRl'71NE PA1'A011 x,110 0 1~4/5Z-1900 ~II'S 21A70 36,760 36A7V tit623100 VF161~TIFXI6 t,120 1,300 2,160 tr15Z.'#.iD0 760 2,000 9D tr162~900 80PE1i~770N8 9,16D t0,70D 6,970 14762.1166 aweeaw77a713. n 70 0 7 ~ m 9 0 i~t 62~eaa6 2so 6o 36, ~a. 7rtsa7o11 Ai.E7~elontrt7ES o ZIA99 2o,e23 t+7sxmri: 797,130 2toa6o 2i7a00 14163 lrtsatlao 6AtJiP7ES 03.900 1te,6eo n6A60 74763t2DD 760 1,000 02D 7rt63•t9oo ~rt8 asa7o IoAOO aa7o trta3a7oo vsa7~orf7r7os aeo 2700 t,so6 7r763330D /to 7,OOD 30 irta93900 a0PBN710NB 0.960 71A00 x,000 7-sia3.7Y66 a9lA8Cl~'110N6 0 210 710 1rt '}.i6M LLMLt1Y X60 16D X60 t-4/53601 8 32.Q0 21A00 ?3.7D0 lr16&701/ ALA 77A00 tA00 920 1r15370TAL; 170,600 100,370 180,820 /73-AM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~TIMATED EXPENDIT I~RES .. 12BOroo faoo7B1 1saa~wl urar4r nx,w~1 oFacaw77ar1 a ~a e~ o a ors F ,~,~, ,4,84„00 BN,ApEB 3!,880 a,2eo s6,32o 14184100D BB~6778 0AB0 12,380 1$380 141643700 4EL a M f180 2,800 1,800 14184.9900 0 700 0 141849000 a0W6M710NB 4,200 8,300 3,800 1416{,9001 a ®UCA710N 300 0 0 14164.9068 a:al~stx1v77or1s 470 62D 800 14154 9080 U11BBlTY 4~ IBO 4BD 14164d02B BBMCES ~,4BD 18,800 29,000 141647044 Kowe~nrtt~s 3,400 0 0 14154roRw 88,440 ee,31o n,o40 141ss wa4~me4r 741s6-17ao su~pES eao 26,e4o 36,e6o 7di5S1000 BF3~iT5 0 10,000 10,100 14186310D VFl a L~7NC4B 180 1,2m 000 141Yr3000 aOPHt o 0 0 14186'{068 a~ 30 tao 0 141863080 LIABNnY o 0 0 td766eo26 8~£S o 700 7Bo 14166 T'OT/~L 010 41,01D 40,840 /.~-did CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 196990 1990A1 ,aeo,9, ACILAL k7w a ADOP7® E971MI17ED F ACCOUNT NU66ER OE9CgP710N ENCUAI®FVE BUOOEf E769~DfTLIiE$ 11158 111861100 8AUViY tO6A80 127,760 114,510 1116610 10 60D a0 117861300 ART•71h~$AtAP7E8 0 0 4,020 111661900 6Ba3R6 37,670 M,710 tl.090 111661901 POBRION CONTNO. 10,630 20,000 8,000 11156310D VELa0~7NCa6 1,60D 3,160 $710 11186.'190D 67p 600 7D 111s699ao aanew79~71e n,63o afieoo te,3fo 111863966 a ~ 660 1,960 S6D 111663960 UA6671Y 86D 800 800 111686028 86NICE8 61,690 39,160 76,10 1/1867014 Al E'OUP 610 0 0 11156 TO7Al 2$,470 272A10 217,900 11157 0197pCi 11157.1100 9MAi9E4 0 36,690 3D,600 11167-1900 BB~116 0 12,6q 13,890 11167 TO7AL• 0 M,570 69,390 /~~AO CITY OF RANCHf3 CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ,,. 1968/90 1000101 199091 ACTUN. E7~ 8 ADOP'1FD ESIIMA7ED F ACCOIXJf NUMBER DESCPoC1fON E71GW ®FVE BUmFf 6'YaEMrtliiFH 11245 FACIL171E8 142461100 BAWilEB o rn,3eo 11a,eao 142161200 0 10,000 Bq 14245.1900 BF14~RB 18,970 30,970 40,900 142463100 VEL a MEE[9J~ 0 0 0 142463300 0 1,000 0 142463000 a OP6M710N9 47s.4p e69AOO aooa0o 14246.'31 U9J10E ChMRBE 0 0 0 142tS3960 LNBILRY 9,!190 11,410 11,410 14246~80Z8 88NICE8 406,300 160,930 304,800 1.6246701{ K E7WB-DITUi~.B 20,400 4,200 S,SaD 142467016 0 ?0,000 15,300 14216 TOTAL• 1,021,370 1,042,100 1,166,980 14266 O'V69fM 142861901 CONIr40ENCY 0 0 0 140862100 COP(1RmtJT10N i0 1,200 1,200 1422200 COMPBJSA7N o o n,26o 142662300 ti66llRie~f4i 13,610 10,000 0.960 142062100 OE4a0FhBR 13,000 30,000 12,420 142862800 ER.a CoNiRe1lTN0 o a o 14266:1002 94aUi o 0 0 142063003 COAP I181A o 0 0 14za609ea WB10Y1NCE o 0 0 1 '.,.. °•••• 1DILFaE pBUlYV4CE o 0 0 142063907 ALW6l1RIV4CE o 0 0 142660969 w6unK+cE o 0 0 142663070 CON'libllfNB 0 0 0 142660971 ~DV/wcES o 0 0 14266 T'O'iAL• 0,570 0,200 37A60 /3 A~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 18B8A0 176on/ 188N81 ACTlY1L W 6 ADOPiF]) E37aNT® 1 arrnirft uuwtm oFSr~nd4 ®PVE 81A0E7 D~Q~D7IIJF~3 14286 ONEAFEAD 1.47H63,0p V6.alA~flNtf ~ 23A3D 6,96D 11286' 00 .aOPEiM110N6 0 0 ' 1-4~6~3Y86 DATA k~9R 0 /O,OOD 0 1/2863888 a W86Ci8dRONB 21.888 78,790 24A60 iJ7863867 .646111 12,780 0 0 1.4766a76e 6s~,1 n,71o 1ao,aro a2.a;5o 1,4286388p 8051.81A71CE 12,C1D 36,000 14A00 117863861 WIB077Y 427,060 tOD.000 760,000 112B6L,062 F~618B2587 0 0 258,690 .TAX ~ 112666028 8Ei1VI t:F.B 888,860 ,,268,600 763,030 1.4286.7pµ EQUPIYB47 0 0 0 ,.47967DTAL 1,243,160 ,,667,260 1,416,760 11913 OEV ADIOi 113/3110p SMtAEB 70,160 ,21,800 122,610 ~~0 0 113133100 VBaM~161G18 7.480 8,300 1 11913.9300 8,660 3,600 8,640 ,1913980D aDP6NT,0818 ,,e6o 7,680 1A80 1131sro6e a8UB8CAPt10N8 zto 1,7p0 eep 1191937eo weu7r 31o em e7o 119tsem9 eatulcEe 11,760 8,6aD 7,166 ,13137x4 A~ov~omnES o 6,000 eAOp 11313 TOTAL• 191,070 198A10 196,770 /3-~44 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ,, 19BNi90 1990/91 1esoNt ACTUAL E7~6 AflOP7® FSTAM7® i ACCDLI1JT Nl1A~ oESC1eP7ion~ btu®rw n~oeEr c~t~atua~H t~ 8N~9 tAee tl 1,9e0. 1,2008 ~ 1-/.i9312DD a~ 1i~331300 Afi7.1ME 8MWE8 19,!10 22,7!0 17.870 1+1999-1900 BBSITS 9d1,tl0 471,300 M1AB0 1~3g3f00 VH.i1~TN108 9,710 16,!00 12,110 1J33'.}3700 9,2!0 3A00 29!0 1J3:*i3Y0D a CP9NTId16 11,!80 7e,7m e$29D 1I.'[K13991 wt9aratwa+ . a,73D aeAa ee,op 1J3t~13o0e asuasaTrTioHe 1.150 t,e2o 1480 1r9s9aaeo L~ACa11Y 1,800 eAeo e,eOD 1+~maozs BBMCE3 In,ao 97aA'ro 417,.900 1~1s7o11 ALO~e~om~s 1,1ao 1a.0o 9.900 1-13937616 0 0 0 1J,9337CTAL• 1,997,990 23YL500 2299A60 1A363 COOYMB$IOH w9s+noo sAtAwEe s,91o e,60o eaoo T~495a3too vaal~rnm e.9oo n,a0o 1o,eoo T-13533900 a OPHNTi0N6 190 750 a0o 14353.9900 uAeaiTV o 190 Teo 1+1353 TCifAL• Y2AT0 team r,12o /~-~~ CITY DF RANCWO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES r 19BWYD 19YiW1 t00q~01 Acnu~~wa ADOP7ID ESi1MATm i ACCOlINT1aM~ABE1i OEf~RWTiON BJCIL~CVF NIfYACT CYOGTffR1 OCC ,~.~ ~$. CQaN~. IJ3643100 vaa~rx~e z,no ~,~60 3.oao 1-a~s+.~uoo a avr~noHS 100 Leo sm 149543D56 asusscavrwros 26D 33D /10 1~s+,'iee0 lL1Eta1iY 30 0 0 1-a9wTOTAL' 3,100 5.590 ~,~eo 14966 ALaloart. 1J3Si3100 VELA aff7TKi 110 2500 300 1366.9300 0 300 0 1/3663800 ,8OPBiAT6]NB 0 500 1,000 14966386D WBal1Y 0 0 0 14966 TOTAL• 110 3,900 1,300 J3-AS CITY Or~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA E TIMATED EXPENDIT RES 1997Af1 leeorol lseorol ac1uK E7w a ~oaP76n E811MA7ED F ACCOIIM NUM6Ea oFar111nn[fnl cwy iu en e„c a.,nr. e.,m..,,. ~e 1!.771 IMI 71Mfi !< R~FFTV 1/3731100 8K4fiE8 1,007,760 1,QOeyq 1,170.e00 1/3731700 pp 3,Opp ~p 1-~379~1300 ARC-TYIE SMapIFg 0 0 10,630 113731e00 6@gR$ 37pd70 626,agp 40p~ 1/3739100 v6ia7.e~~e4c+s 4.e70 6,000 Sde0 1-~373:i900 3 3. o 113733700 a OP8ig110NS /~ 40970 ~ a6 113733701 age4181M1CE n,a60 m,a6o e0,7m 113739766 a s1166a1v11oN 2!0 e7o e60 11373a7eo ~n 3.7m a90o a3oo 113736028 s67N1cES 3a1,wo 9m,ee0 7aa,aoo 1137370/s KE>~DIIIiE9 e,6q 76,07D 16,630 113737016 KN8eIXE8 o s1,oo0 76,770 +1373 T07'HL• 1,88{920 7,6/4,010 1,7e3,6e0 1-M61 D~ARI1B4f 1146i•1100 SNXES 36$10 43,290 21,760 11161-1200 0 0 9e0 1.4461.1300 ~wr-n,,E Sys 6e,66o ez,~o rt9oo 11461-1000 (!88118 14,470 1a19o 7,e70 11461a1a0 o¢aa~rxl6 1,700 za6o i,a70 11461~DOD aor63a71o14e 96,ieo e2,67o e6a6o 11461ax1, aw4raarel 767,070 Df,460 ao.0oo 1-4461aose aaueealanowe 1.7eo aaeo 2,600 1.41614070 861VIC69! ed91,4eo a74l,700 a74a2oo 11461-7014 KEi~•BOUPaB(f 34,360 t0dt0 3,670 11461-7016 KEO~•VBeGEB 0 10,000 14x10 11461 TOTAL• ae41,170 7,7b2,6?D 7,237,110 /3- AT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 1989190 1990191 1990A/1 Acn1AiE~a ADOPT® ESTIAAg7ED ACCOUNT NUMBER PESCVOPlI0P1 9NIXMd ®PYE BW [IET E7~B~OmliEs 116,92 BEAVICEB I~sax-t+ao au~vaEe aeoan maeeo s+o,aoo 1-~ssx-laoo 0 o t.ro I~ssz-Ism ~Rr-~B~s +aa,~oo /s+,ao Isl,alo 11632.13m PARE-TME BAL 0 IOABO 10,900 1163y19m 0091-RB09Al 1M,~D Y1A,OOp 202.72D /I632-19m BBJ-P/T&IL 0 X190 2,190 1163231m vEI.aMEE9NOB 19,~D t0A1o ta,.6o IIS'i2.9;i00 6,310 62m e,seo Ireaaa9m a OPBIA710N8 191,bq 227,900 za3,96o 163zaa31 MA91raOPe1 s,39o also a16o I-~632~Oa ailJ08C1>P11pi6 1,060 1,900 IA00 1163939eo UABaflV s,D6o s,~3D 3,a9o 116356078 8Eg10CE$ 39,060 116,90D 76,Om 1/6327013 AL tl~PNCYE0a9JI8 0 0 0 116.1'b70M AL E00••EOUP66~ff 0 12,910 7,tm 11632.7016 AL EJT-VEiaC1E8 0 1a0m 1~.TJi0 116.9270TAL' 1,100,290 1,37a000 1,Za{,980 1.16q ANOIEC. f~lfl/8810N 1-161D31m 4ELaa~iN018 71D 2,M0 60 /1610.'~m a OPeN91oN9 eso sm 70 /16103066 asueealvrloN6 360 16D s1o 116103900 LJ~89JIV t0 10 b 11610 TOTAL• 1,7611 3,700 600 /3-A!l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 7989AiD 1990I0i 7980197 wcl,w.owa wovt>:a Esntiwho i nccouHr rlutev, oESa~wnon7 eacuM ®~ e~.~ F7~nm7r,~s +.~ ~ 1~-nao sa.~s ~ea,ea, aaoaso 1ae,9eo 14677•,100 9,azi z„o ,.Soo ,453r•+39o ~rtr-n~swv~a o 0 0 14897•,800 Ba)sSTS 7'1,,0, 57,77!0 s4ao 145373100 VES. a l~Taa76 5,60 7,550 z300 148373300 3,099 3,500 1,950 ,48373800 aov7au7nar5s naa>' 78,M3 10ASo 148373831 wM i 0P6, 4,Sa7 t0,BOD 10,800 145373891 wart 0 0 0 /48373855 ali,58CpP710N9 310 S70 910 14837388D LI~BBJTY zZ,B 1,309 7,310 t4537aoae 8B,97CEe eso3o n,om e7,z,o ,4537.7ws KECUinaErt o a o ,4837 TOTAL: 887,503 I8D,979 39t,+1o ,4s3e ato~rt 1483&1+00 sins s3o,ae5 511,970 522.910 ,4635•,200 0 0 0 1-~o-,300 ~wr-n~ ar~uraES o 0 0 4e3s-taao assns 2o3,e+s 22/,6a0 21eo3o ,453e.91ao os.aw~wos +ss. at5o taro 1-~ssa33oo o Soo rao ,4638<i800 aareanas e+3r +o,2a x,090 14RM3991 wwraane+ 0 0 0 +4e3e3x,z wart o 0 0 4536a95e aauseuaPt-a+s ~ 718 Sao 146363000 UAaalIY ~.BK7 5,138 5,,.10 146318E078 SENYICfB 595,980 199,186 M21,~10 1463670M ALE7~-E.~OUi-BQT 0 900 0 14536771/5 AL El0'-VBfGEB 0 0 0 14638.8636 1A10: 0 0 2100 14698 TOTAL• /,3oz92D 1,389A09 1,D6,100 /3-~'/ CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 19BB,N0 ,sown, 188w41 NctuKOwa ~corr® Esraal>® r nccouur rx11,sQ1 oESCAVrlari Fxx>w4 ®~ alneer o~eanmrFs 1J99D ?11AFFICa1m~rt 1~1a1/oo >~ 188,269 217,0 180.860 1~99P1200 0 1,aoo 1,000 i~ i m ~ ~ ~~~ . 1 vaaalFF7wc19 io ao 3 i9o 1~4938330D o 300 0 -~ssa~o0 a aveuma+s ~,an aseo e,aa 1~8~,9831 Aa1M80P9i 0 9,900 3,90D 1~B3i3832 aNNi 0 0 300 1J634.9Y66 awseawrlarls 38a ssa 210 1~69D.' a0 tNBRAY 7M !67 900 118,9P8028 BHiVICfS 21,808 68,789 48,680 1J9~70M KE7~-EGUPABJ~ 0 17,BOD 17,8,E 1-46987048 KE70'-VE}1CIFS 0 0 0 1938 TO7K: 200.83,9 4,780 394.860 iJ910 1101Ni 18401100 8MN~8 9.BBD 8A80 11640.1800 ael~ns s,11s 2460 2,3x0 1194oa1ao vsaaffna~9 L14e 4,aoo 1,140 1-+e4oa30o o eoo 160 11640.9fW0 aave~71a14s 3A9e 4,000 3,600 11810<•091 wWTaava+ 0 0 9 116403864 aw~r o 0 0 11640,996e iala9pp110N6 s18 tAq 670 11940.'8190 LgBalfY 461 666 660 11610x028 8ER19CE8 38,818 63.837 60A70 11810.7044 KE'70r-EOUPa@!7 a o 0 -4940 TdTAL• 41,?P2 74,978 06,460 /~rI _~ CtTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES iuearoo 1980/81 198091 AcTtw.owa ADOPTF3J E6TIMAT4~ sM1L IAR'I.N I\YICO IfFR!`OIVi1fIN 4TI[yw /61 GVE HIIDDET E7~1)(R1I>F9 1J841 ~If1A47 11.1100 BAWiEB 787,712 90D,63D 40!.0!0 1-MN-1700 7,808 1$160 12,160 11M11-1000 NR-TI,E &WiEB 0 0 0 1~6N•1900 6F3~TT8 80,671 106,990 101,000 16.11.3100 vELaE~11NC18 u2t 2,976 830 1J6{19900 aaveuTla+6 3,976 7A00 6100 1J811.'901 w1MB~IWCE uo,9oa 1as,99o loaaoo 113966 a8lR8CAPTlOta9 000 760 ao 1~es13ueo uA661-v eeo laea laud iJ841~8078 BEAYICEB 3662 22,M 17,160 1-M41.7014 AL F)~-EOtNPA@J~ W4 0 0 1641_7016 K~-yp6ClE8 0 0 0 1841 TOTAL' 462,962 680,161 630,680 t-x868 Ok1l. - 16A8lT.tlE16CLEH i EOUIP. 1J816.1100 9Al/1i61:8 19,731 781,160 101,880 J6161200 1,W1 0 2x30 18461900 BB8TT8 66301 99100 67,160 16463900 . aOPHiAT10N8 1$466 178,000 100,800 1J646.~.90 ma3o 263,8M 7W,a0o 1J616.,991 ~A9rr. 72,382 9,36 ,32,000 -~e~s3ueo u~eanr 2.e66 e,7e s,,76 1~646a00 vals7EnruL a 2op00 7e,6oo 1~e16aou aoa'FACamES o nano 0 1J61670M ALDO'•EGtB>ABii 19786 17Da0D 4,800 X6467016 ALFap-v8aC1E8 11,666 76A00 a,aoo 1J618 TOTAL 476.966 1Ata901 7auae7 /3-AJI( CITY 4F RANGHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 1869/90 1690p1 1990N1 nclw~owa ~oav1® E6111.M7® i ACCOUNT Dx4.sEA oFSCgonaN ~ u nn M e,.,nR ~..,... 11647 OkV.- Y~Ml~ OI ~1 M YMYfYO 1-aeaalao 9~waES l,rw,ets l,em,eeo 1,alapa~ 1~M7-tea 60.pa ~DAaO ~OAaO 11647.1300 Aqf-TOE BAIAgIEB /6AB7 11,81 11,N0 1.4647.1900 B161~R8 621,310 561,660 Sn,460 1-Mg3100 11aaA~EETN016 9,M 10,760 8A0D ,.ea-3soo zn3 zaoo ,,aoo 110479900 aane1A72x16 703,193 63~eto 67eno 11647.9D91 avw7aevel aw,417 326.000 32aA00 116476932 1a164r 76,027 19op1e 1aeeo 116476933 aiE0Vg1FNR 0 16,000 10,000 1-M473aaa a M~aCIFIIOWa 666 1,676 1,q0 116476960 u~a9v 21.91e 66,166 24,120 11es7aoa Ntl131E RMVI. 7,460 1o,00D 10,000 11647dDZS 69i16C4i8 903,030 690,104 643,660 1-M47.7013 ALO~FACaJ1Y 166.TJ6 60,000 30A00 11647-7014 AL FF7a'-EOtlih@/7 70A06 764aD 61,160 11847.7046 KE7~-VE36fXE8 396,607 261,766 100,7aD 11647.6021 181 U7Lf1E9 90.610 160,20D 1/2,360 116476071 tlI671E8 102,002 100.160 106,160 116Q TOTAL: 6,269,166 0.171AOe 4,471.107 11961 1/0016000 N 0 (61 (61 1.4001-0000 OUr {74,000 426,OOD 426,000 1.4901 TOTAL• 426,000 343,068 313,100 /3 A~ Ci7Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ieeeJeo 16e0y91 1i190Ve1 ~c71.uLLOwa ~oow1® ,~ nccotx+r r61n1~a oESCnwnort 274CUU ®FyE 6uoGEr DwB1om>FiEe r -11ao 11E1~uneoerr sins 43,660 711.67Y na6o nano 0 0 700 -1800 BB4fffTS x2,247 D,eae 26,070 aeon .al3veaA7tarvts o 46FOO 0 a93t 1~ux4r. 0 2o.66z to,aeo TO7AL• 86,797 174At9 116,000 J847 -1847-1100 TRAMS HEI~B.11K4i. SMAIRE6 4,721 SB,BW 36,960 X847-1700 ME SALAREB 0 0 0 -4847-1300 AHT-711.E SUAWE$ 0 0 0 7.4847-1900 BEARS 1,834 Za,812 20,812 -4647aem . a avs-~naHS o ee,a6z o ~e47ae31 OPEMTIONB o ae,3a u,t7o ssa7aaa2 oaa.rtaGVr,+o~rt o 1ao46 0 X817 TO7AL• 6,366 t86,e24 71,762 e3-~z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 1988/80 ,saos, 1980p1 acrw~owa AoarlEa Es7vv~~ accouN7 NUMBER oESCairtarl Er1cu4 ®fYE 9u0oEr oweaomxlEs ~ Me97 7mao 7.1800 71831 71028 7 TO7AL• ~ s.dmrB~47. sNra6:9 BE7~rT8 M~aarsl 9EBiVICE9 ~ 3,886 1,181 0 x,420 32,489 ~ 2686 e66 1,790 eo,0o0 N,e88 -. 2,a2o e66 1,200 eoaoo 84,718 r~1c 2tm -110o saawES se,767 9ffi,BIXi 286,660 -1200 ME 933 88,500 0 -1300 /Hf-TN.E 9N~1PoE9 0 0 0 -1800 BE34EffT8 75.7% 117,481 103,690 leso iuekrrv 3,216 0 0 L02B 9HiVICF9 391,002 288,000 706,300 -low aE~~GUrMNr o 197,272 7.0,700 •7ow AL E)w-vEwCtE e7.3ez 183,487 82,480 ao7z urnntE9 e3,s1z e7,oao e7,ao0 1703 ~4B,enw~rn~ fie,7n o 0 17n .woe rnn3+ran o 10,000 0 8780 ST1AE8 a fNC i 14,821 17,000 7,310 -8813 awPaea4o6~ 141,460 1,000 1,810 1816 -W67E SlllsiiYBaBD 2,000 0 0 ~ 21,164 0 4,900 8800 978I10MD PRQJ 1,879 0 O -0801 -YVDE BOEW/CURB 197,488 0 0 -0001 -VdDE 81DEW~CUiiB 0 10,000 O •9002 -Wfi)E 9T. iE}148. 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,018,079 1,D0,213 782,970 /3-~Qf1 CITY O~ ~ANCNO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES +searoo +auaw+ +~aw+ acnw.owa aoovi® eanru~~ o~nmoo BMAPoES o 0 0 own-+aoo ~wrn~e~t~wES o 0 0 oasa~-teoo ea~rrs o 0 0 ors- (nac~e~o-wwa+) o o w3,ooo o~ n7rn~ o o ~,aao ~~n z+oe a x+m.s i~-+too 341AgE6 t30A67 7,041 e,mro 1837-1700 4,927 0 3,86{ +~-iaoo ~wr-n~s~u~w~s o 0 0 ,~a9oo wrx~ ee~rts e9,a7a 2,4a4 z4e. 1+7.7046 wow-vow 0 0 0 +1.1837 TO7AL• 2/a,170 9,606 +2,188 /3-,Q,B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMt3NGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 19BB/11D ,eBO/a, 1990191 ACCIXINT NUA6ER elwa AooPle) EBTIAIAT® ~ ,,,,, ..:.:,.~,~:.:~a 24837-1100 BIILAi0S4 80,916 104,68 67,130 21647-1300 ART-7ME 9MAI~8 0 0 0 21837.1900 BE3~ITS 0 30,660 30,660 2.48378180 ~ ~ 32,012 248378201 ®8TH / 4, 29 0 0 2-0837.0006 OT F083014 96,Zd2 0 M,09B 218378705 OOTFOIL®NOl7£9'IEA 30,220 0 4,980 246378707 ®Ei113VM'DA 4,8~ 0 0 2.48378706 HOHl7~0 ®OtlLlJl~l 93A40 0 0 218378712 VENO]AVE.9W 16,863 0 0 848378713 BKi Cd0i0) 1e,000 2,000 16,000 21837.8774 TIRi~HitFCWTFOLL 0 0 8,400 216378821 ATN>ri S71AY 60,802 16,000 31,276 1216478823 VB4 a 18TH 80,800 0 0 248378825 :~ 2,973 0 87 1240378828 83,802 1,000 8,038 1218378827 aVAL BB,727 1,000 8,036 2/8378828 19TH a HBipBA 2,929 3,000 87 12-483788 /AFiCf•BIItD 113,981 1.000 32,408 216778830 30lt~CT10N6 2AZ1 0 B7 1216378831 a HAVBJ 117,300 0 116,483 218378832 FtAVB4IVIC'f0(>rA 87,729 1,000 8,038 2-46378833 OpT}9LLaI1MlpPyl 4,000 2,000 4,900 218378636 CC101D94A110N 16,000 $OOD 18,000 1216378872 32D 0 0 246378873 7TH a HAVB4 340 0 0 248378803 9THP+or+lDll++ve4) 164,469 s,ooo 0 21647-880{ NP E/17EA8T 114,186 0 14,791 218378906 1gM~0 HC4197D) 159,474 10,000 169,908 Pegs 1 d 2 /~ r~~ CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES '" 1969M0 1990A01 1990A31 Ac7trALOwa ADOPT[]? e3nAMTED arcniurnnlwAaEw n~xvnou aiaiu®rvE eu3ca~r omanmslEs 'JU1tTlJ1M',r °^~'°.,:...",w w~v,i~w~v ~ Y,b~ 2A00 4,498 2-J837880D /W1~~AElIAW'1) 1,36 10,000 t6b 2~a97~910 Q$MOBAaMYBNY) 139,692 6,000 941,207 21b3!-BDtI 79,21b 1,000 0 z-ae37~1z -+~~ a 7m mso1 1.am o 2x837.8913 b. 0 108,000 1,900 2J637-0B14 5,390 106,000 980 2Ja97•B915 810:AT~IW/VNVFO 5,720 86,000 520 2-X837.8818 FELLAdP1659J0. 0 103,OOD 1,900 2837.8917 FBCIFB.MD6lEL10T1 0 26$000 0 24837Jl918 8-Rl1CEaT8iMV18TA 5,990 106,000 980 2-1837-0919 18TW911PF~ 38,000 1,000 6Z5 2837.8920 RIE 81C~UCE 27,564 0 0 12Ja97-0821 COOfiD:VNViD/CAflEU 0 2,000 9,780 2-4837812 IiFC CMiil Pli00 11,000 0 11,000 12637.8912 COTFILL®ROCFEBiFA 0 0 898,000 2J837-9003 CMAL 0 25,000 0 24837-900M1 FQL6ANJ/CFBFICH 0 106,000 0 12837.9006 CAT#~ELIANMVEFiO 0 4,000 0 zre37-9ooe aaM rnF caNTS1DL o lzaoo 0 2-4637- walLArn6rlocxls7a o 0 0 x4637- 0 0 0 12.46?/- s na o 0 0 a4e9r- ~ a o a 21837- CONT OEVICE r4V 0 0 17,000 2-46T7• ®ROCfFs3TEfi 0 0 10,000 2~6i7• VNEVAPD aAI>IiOW 0 0 0 24991-9000 CFq T07DA8 202,869 0 0 &9637 TOTAL: 2,172,146 1,133,978 1,802,296 a za 13-~BQ CITY OF HANCHf3 CUCAMf3NGA TIMATED EXPENDITURES 198W90 1990191 1990N1 ACRWF9~6 ADOPIID ESTMIAT® d[`LY1lM 09A,gFR []Ff13iRI1M1 CI~YY W AP M w rvrr Mc1nm nea 134653 81iVC8•AE~J17N n .can ~~afn m•.rnae au pace mnen 34663/900 BBrfff18 0 0 0 3,6a4~9900 aaPa+ATaNa I/a,,lo Ila7eo 159,78D 34683<io90 LIMMJTY 3,670 3AB0 3,690 1346636900 .K3@Si4L 0A16iFEAD 0 68,790 76,,90 3-,66960 96iV1~3 ?78,970 2{1,960 300,,30 3,663.70q AL E.7~•FACNJIY 8,040 1,000 1,99D 346637044 Al E>O'B~iD1R8E8 4.710 3,700 0 3,663 TOTAL• 390,7,0 616,,90 673,780 94637 FAC: ETNVMDA 94637-1100 PAYROLL 8,790 0 0 9463!•1900 BETff(18 0 0 0 94637-6900 OVHBEAD 0 0 6,560 9-4637-0154 S1ROM DMNa 1,026 0 1,026 194637$/66 8RAP4+43E PUN ,0,,98 0 0 9~4631AB40 3D W/O 115 ,BO,OW 0 473,021 84637• )OV E7NVAMASD 0 0 0 94637 TOTAL' 530,363 0 ,79,913 /3-,B~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC3NGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES .. 1899/80 1990/91 1990/91 ACTUAL EXPa ADOPTED ESTIMATED F ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ENCUM (A FYE BUDDET E%PENDITURES n-I5.'1~ IRK DFVFI DPYFNT 0.1532-1100 EODUR PAYROLL 0 117,710 112,990 •1532.1800 RINOE BENEFITS M,071 31,999 31,700 0-5532.3890 ENEML LIABILITY 30,081 102,770 102.900 0.1532.5900 DMIN/GENE OVERHEAD o 1,511,013 939,720 0-1592.9029 ONTRACT SERVICES o 0 0 0-1332.8008 ION'S PRK TENNIS CT 217,191 0 29,370 -1532.8007 ERYL PRK TENNIS CRT 380,269 0 51.230 •1532-8015 EST BERYL PARK 1,739,121 0 383.310 0-1532.9811 ORTH TOWN PARK 361,890 0 790 0.1532.9787 /E COMMUNITY PARK BM,728 0 935,000 0.1532.9789 ENTRAL PARK DESIGN 10,092 0 500 0-1532-9770 REEKSIOE PARK 19,120 0 51,97a 0.1532-0808 RED HLMRTO BALLFIELD 99,813 0 0 0.5532-8807 LOPE PINT:HERT8RE0 0 8.7,000 0 0.1532-8808 EIOHBORHOOD PRK ACO. 1,000 9,003,000 0 0-1532.8871 PORTS PARK COMPLEX 598,902 0 0 D-1532-9908 NTRL PRK LND OB RET 0 1,287,900 0.4532.8802 /E COMM PARK DESIGN 0 0 0.1532.9808 /E COMM LND DB RETR 0 0 0.1532.9921 /E COMM PRK GONCEPTUAI 0 87,000 Q/532-89N CHOOL PLYFLD UPGRADE 1,108,575 0 12,010 0-1532-8827 /E COMM PRK DB RETR 990,220 {02,210 102.210 -1532-8928 TRl PRK DEBT RETR 1,223,129 0 1,287,800 0-1532-9929 ERIT.PRK.FIEID RNV 91.499 130,000 289,Q0 0.1532.8991 EROOF:HERTaREDHILL 1,081 129.x00 8.300 1532.8853 PORTS CMPLX CNST/DSO 12,719 0 1,050 -1532-8951 ED MILL FIELD RENOV 788,018 25.000 18.150 0.1532-9000 LM LYON REIMS 0 1,003,000 1,825,000 1592.9010 PORTS LT CONTROLLERS 0 52,000 0 0.1532.9011 RABS VOLLEYBALL CRTS 0 11,000 0 0-1592-8012 IWANDA H.B. INSTL 0 815.000 25,110 -1532-9013 .C.EIEMENTARY INStt 0 /ag000 178,780 -1632-8011 EAR GULCH ELEM INSTL 0 29.500 17,150 -1532-9015 AR.SCH000MPROV 0 1,011,000 18,770 1532.8019 OMM CTR9 IMPROV 0 230,000 8,770 0.1532-9017 ON T. TAPIR PARK 0 377,000 2,290 1532-9018 /E CDMM PRK PURCHASE 0 799,000 250 -1592.9019 ERITAOE EOUES SAFETY 0 9,000 0 63T•8020 EIOHBORHOOD PRK DSO 0 93,000 0 -1532-9021 .C.NEIOHBORHOOD CTR 0 20,000 0 -5532- HAFFEY COLlEOE FIELD MNT 0 0 0 -1332• ERITADE BALLFIELD LT RENO 0 0 0 0-1532 TOTAL: 7,981,171 /2,118,830 8,190,500 /?-B~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ,988/90 199NB1 is9orol Acrua-owa aoavrm esTlra7rn nccourrrHUnle~1 oescaw7wrl EHCl8Afa1FVE etnoer owalom,aEs 14847 a mrrm~w e~ w. 14847.1100 PAYROLL }03,402 BD,411 78,470 4847-1800 BEHEiT18 0 78,144 28,144 i-4847-5900 OY68£AD 0 0 180,310 48478W8 17~D8CP 158,198 1,000 0 48478W7 BGA11T, 10,894 0 1,818 1-4847-8136 BEAIlT. 1,500 1,000 1,000 14647-8138 VEN BEMITA4FDW43 34,718 0 31,517 148478824 CV6 10,469 0 10,468 -4647718 f03J a BTH 8T. 7,312 3,000 3,000 14847-8719 MONUbBJTB 724,189 13,000 233,134 148478722 OO7H81 (3D 0 0 1-4647~77Z3 BRIDAL7RNL 917 0 0 148478724 VBI-RIMKBKx1uROH7O 17,x7 0 0 4w7-e77e -woE~rrvea 14,300 zaoo 0 148478787 9TH a Ht]AIOBA 14,ns 0 0 1-4647-8768 9TM ®W£8T u1~T 14,785 0 1,297 14647-8780 PRI:W IhPFN 9,730 0 0 i ~ i~ 4 64 w/ocrwrEl.uw 19x567 1,900 1,000 14847-9794 VEN AIEDIRA1S 81 377,942 1,om 5,201 146478786 VEN MEDUNB N 1,ffi8 0 0 148478798 VISTA A~IMIB 4,370 0 0 146478814 I~H ~ MP/4TH 18,070 211,000 372,071 i-4617A8~ COBBIESTOFE 31,960 0 25,000 46478812 Ad~EL PRIbW 30,38 0 0 14647.8613 PRIOUAY 8 T~IAI4 9,315 7,000 2,000 146p88M PRkW B.PRV 0 0 0 48Q881l1 TRYTPOOYI&W 125,841 0 0 1484788/1 BFJ1tRR't70.18 40,000 0 33,750 4647-8992 VISTA (~ NAP 40 38,000 57,000 148478933 8T W.AME~ffiN 0 0 0 1.48478934 pKy/$,B,{D 0 0 0 4&78936 E.rF7F11d88W 70,918 295.000 373,000 14981-9000 CHO FRM O@lL FD 183,815 0 0 4647 TOTAL• 1,823,468 776,666 1,338,258 /3-B~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 19B9AT0 i980y1 ,990/9, ACTUAL ETPa ADOPTED ESTIMIATED ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCPoPTION ENCUM FYE BUDGET EIPENDtT11RES -i,iu, --io iewio uCYUVi'111tIV1 ru -1100 PAYROLL 198,888 29+1,SW 301,090 -4~'1~ ~~ O 103,110 103,110 9800 aOPERATIOM6 0 11,333 0 .5900 OVFAFEAD 0 0 117,850 4837-7044 : EOUPMENi 0 9,918 0 1831-8133 ARW STiiA Oii4 191,258 p 1637.8601 W 1031 GFUDE 9EP 30,832 0 3D,260 1837A812 STD SPEC PLN 730 0 -9637616 TR fECON3T 18,680 0 418?9 MAPPING 70.700 0 70,502 JMI-8729 19TH®METFIY5T 838,078 0 13,0 1637-8130 wI0ET4 911,960 8,500 578,844 -8731 WIDEN ETNV 382,286 8,500 281,744 a7az woE341nc. 16,870 1es,aoo 2.aoo 1637A735 LADEN ARCHIBN,D 1,143,372 1,700 87,638 1637A738 WIDEN GAMER 16,177 2,000 0 -4931a73e apoaEwIDE34 e,a1 s9,aao 7s,ooo X738 AN EXT ARCIBBAID 4,2W 0 0 16378'742 GRANT APP 43.587 0 0 -4637-9743 9TH IMPPN W. lATT8 371,070 0 214,749 1837-8741 9TH IMPROM HERMO&1 31,275 408.000 386,297 1&T7A74s 19TH IMPROV. BEAYL 56,754 816.000 43,981 1637-8748 19TH ®HAVB4IHTPSCT 190.458 0 0 1631-8748 LLSDE IMP MMJVCLiTE 4,948 p -4637-8749 fECON.I9TH 9,584 1,000 789 -483741750 Fii XidB 500 0 0 1637a7s1 RR JONC4 a i41R sae 0 /63/4453 BLPM AACFBID 31,758 71,000 37,810 '4631'9755 MAIN F80lM.PA 15,186 p -8759 TE CiB~6ML PLAN 2,604 0 Sp,1 1837841 ®ML111034 0 30,000 0 ~~ •463'8850 ARD PA®ATBSF 98,107 p 7 ~ 163741861 ~ iii XMq ®ATSF 9.157 3,000 . 184,878 -8852 9TH SA.IMP 34,910 0 18 151 -BaS9 IMP-EAST 4,388 , 1 a 183)AB66 LSON IMP-PaETHY6T 46 2,0001 8868 IMPlBlO eANV 1,491 2,000 ~~ n~~~~ i3-By CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCaA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ~ - tee7,so 19gW1 199gg1 actw~o~a ~ooP1» ESIWM4® i AMN MR IJI YiCO (YOfY11CNW eW u m nc e~ ~rfcr cvm,n,w lace ~wr~rw -80.47 inru~rv o.~,riwririe 16MB i+e,iov x600 aiM,u 7x000 -,mu err 7,800 sale 1m1a67tan o 0 0 -~i/-809D 1YTN a F~L1MN1 0 0 0 4ID10 %,i% 1.700 9a7B0 ~B{1 PK %,1% 1,700 %,188 X647 74(iFFT#.®PACH 4,000 886,000 69x673 AB17 17a,7'OB 0 108,8% X844 lfflialSMKI$A 0 0 0 au46 us~owa-raaloea w,mz %o x316 ~4e s1a.F4w.®rwvrl lane o tarn ~e9eo POLES o o taoe4 -0072 VICfOiilA P.L 0 60A00 16,000 -48379024 AN dRDOE®DRCp( 0 170,OOD 0 4637 TOTAL• 5,197,404 a0?E,218 3,834,193 •981 DEVELOPa@fi -4881-9000 OLR 483,407 0 ~ 0 X881 TOTAL• 48x407 0 0 8 2of2 /3-BS CITY OF RANCH© CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 1989/8D 1880191 ,990/8, AcnlALOwa ADOPTED ESTIMAIm i ACCCllM NIIA.i14Z1 KQ!•LIOTIlbJ __ . ____._ .._.- ~.~~... .... ..w.z, w i,nsa / FI~V: t11:1V'L VII T -1100 PAV740IL 57,8$0 97,7D6 101,780 •1900 BETJ~IT9 O 31,022 34.072 5900 14174K~84N.OVE9iF~4D 0 0 98,100 5152 51318 PIN 0 2,000 0 5154 A4rDI-STAM DRAMS 24,332 0 24,332 '8818 S7RM DAMNS 148,214 0 0 5781 47,280 1,446,000 10,591 -0782 V8 SDiM DRA1N8 4.000 0 57&7 CRk7AiYON 12,977 0 2,858 5756 FARM CULVEN7 80,178 0 -8768 MAIINKf PLAN 90,219 0 B6ar80 5784 CRI(M9TR DFiAl1 138.000 0 30,000 5785 DAY,OR CRIC 0 87,000 0 5802 LL.SIDE STRM 0(146.57 80,842 0 5847 IIFCUG19A. 44,375 310,000 9,864 SBSB II CAF>NELIMI 41,221 2,000 10,593 5880 9 COCA SPRRSD 28,917 1,000 8,398 5081 S D WA) DAY o 2,000 0 -0882 VH9L91DE RD 375,131 1,000 178,687 5883 VI IEMON BD. 82,229 2.000 6,2D6 ~8BB5 9A<.F7FNST SA. 188,068 5,000 148,997 X47 N 9A.DE$i CK 85,879 2,000 52,108 5948 NSD.47M SD 43,866 4,000 ~~ 5949 VI HCi41AD SD4.wFi A 40,990 zooo u,ea•1 5950 IX 14AVB4 SID // 0 0 0 5851 MADf4ES/O ARw 0 0 343,328 •soz4 u cua4 SPAAeD Ph1ASE I o 380.700 a AeweuRSala4rs D o 4e,DDo TOTAL• 1,588.806 2,358,717 1,245,936 44837 'LAID URBAN (FAIJ) 44837-1100 PAVAOLL 25,070 31,611 32,910 4837-1900 ' BE8~6113 0 12,W9 12,079 1-46775 775 7>rUCA ORF~C 47,078 3ffi,000 467,000 '8838 VE34 AVE t4Q01B. 210,108 1,392,000 t50,000 TOTAL• 382.209 1,770,590 881,999 ~-~ CITY C3F RANtriiC• CUCAMONCA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES f 1889190 1990791 1980/81 AcTUALOa~a AnoP~ esnmwlEn ACCOUNT NUA,~EH OESCFBPTON CnY:i uJ n M ni rvYr Fm:rnm ioee RBRV FD/OQ4'L O4RiFD '11Yf0 .BOPEf91TK><JS 800 0 7043 AL E70'ALD09`i 3,398,126 0 704/ AL E,~~EOUP p 11 PAfYCNCOBiN 1,.990 0 .EHHQf6rA POlE3 10,818 2000 2,560 TOTAL: 3,388,33/ 2,000 2,580 D6V BLK (4RAlIf FU6D 1100 SHAPES 0 0 38,830 1900 BETlfffT9 0 0 13,590 181 TONM PAW( 390,154 0 0 186 TON 84,962 86,800 83,670 187 A1R HOUSPq 171 0 4,330 199 W7111B. n,9S2 80,000 16o,aao 191 LOCKGMNi 3,129 0 193 S!fi'D HOUSMIGI 8,072 8,300 8,220 194 E3i0-4BWD. 77,284 0 CAA0.L0II,PfiY 3,853 0 11 MADIEIPI/VCIpA 297,433 0 12 VE74L1A VEWi 152,813 0 1 1,pfE$/O ARiN 5,867 20,000 VMM41R DE3K9rl 10,878 0 0 .P~vsletAe, o zo,tao 2,1/0 K1CA610N64 ST8. 0 240,000 0 OE91GN 0 0 8,000 NY1pfE OE810N 0 0 8,000 9044 VHiAB DE'51014 0 0 8,000 9046 W34OJAL 0 0 24,000 C7R INPROV 0 0 0 CFWIRA~PS 0 0 0 AL7(ORNDNp 0 0 0 TOTAL• 1.08$393 433,000 361,750 /3 -,8~ CIrtY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES - +sewoo ,soon, isscwi Acn~owa Aooar~ ~ AccouNr NuNe~a o~avnaN eNCt».~ ®~ euocler ~eaomrPFs -1100 i SdIARIEB n u~m -~ • ~ -1900 Aqf-11hE 80L/Ii0E8 0 0 0 -1000 BB~R9 0 10,061 t0A64 -00~ NOTAiDBIN ~ 0 06A00 0 -8027 VBi BTMpRdV PHI 0 807,000 14,500 -00'lB VBJ 9T p~PpOV PFW 0 70,OOD 0 Boas wioearaErwe o 71a,ans o caNiRa.oEwceNV 0 0 0 - AVE~@If Mf1UAiPROCYIAM 0 0 0 VBJ pO0N0 ~ATBF 0 0 178,OOD M. 0 O 0 - VBJiBMB(I1NNf7M.) 0 0 0 4037- CM,AL$7I~iR'FNB 0 0 0 X837- FbMB 0 0 90,000 -4837 T'O7AI_ 0 1,780,880 310,804 /3-!~~ CITY ©F f{ANCHO CUCAMUNGA ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 19ewgo ,aNOro, 199W91 ncnr~EOwa ~oorrEa ~ nccaurniu~t or-stslw7id~ aacla/®cvs ~u.,n 9~wetemsaEs T-T -0030 8-A78F 880.000 f,iB8,000 9031 ITFI(C.FM.tMUM(RIV~ 18!.000 0 5032 ~VEW) 89.000 81,000 5033 811RCFN0) 817.000 0 So3/ vea aerwe a wioea 37.000 0 So36 NYPIMM6E1 1,800 t,aoo 5030 MP P1M8E N 1,800 0 5037 FIE NEAP PH N 300 0 BOOB HOI~N3iM0.C~1 780 0 5039 • BSW ®E'IIV11M80A 300 0 -9010 ' 8610 ®VIC PpC 300 0 50/1 ' P7iiOW ®FHiM09A 160 0 0 TOTAL• 0 1,213,800 1,250,000 /3-BM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS NO. 10 THROUON 08 /3-!~N CITY OF RAFiCiiO CUCAiNpFIGA SPECIAL PIEVENUE FUNDB NO. 40 THNOUGH W ESTIMATED EYPENDITIpE~ r 1iW70 177gM 170N01 ACIUAL EID• AOOPDEO E7TIWTED NUYBEN OEBEItlPI1b1 GNPAW ~fK YIMR CYEEY6T IEEE •1]0 Otd1PE NAINf. pQ. I7A I/361707 .......~ 0 0 0 136+ao+ tiL6O'A170711 >O a m 130.300D ADP6NTION7 a o 0 +367700 OV131FFM 0 o w 1307027 &N-VIIOLIIOON111O 0 M 270 1J67727 8RV41E0 L14iM 1.0'M 1,610 7,620 367021 A6ER Uf21DE7 +N 710 770 J1367072 UI61f1Ee +q +70 100 1 JO TOTAL 2,1M 80/0 2dio 130 WINE. DIBi. I1 1361106 BAlANEB 0 0 0 136+000 6@IEFR6 0 0 0 130.1001 AOMN 11 A77 12,001 72,SW 130J000 AOI+flMTgNi 4AA 2000 s,e66 +363031 NA7rt7OPe1 o a,aro eA00 1303010 -TAff 11PIAN17 aoro 600 0 1363700 ovEa/EAD o 1,sY 3,120 1367020 ~ 6 3At1 t,i11 is66arl DpV-VNDUIWRpo O 4A00 17,970 13oaa27 aaralEDWI17f 126,m e7Als Ta1a 1s6ea29 WwrANOeaAD o 2,en o 1367013 AL k70'~PPD.[~Cft 7A70 0 7A70 iJ6701t AL OVtd1APOfIf 0 0 0 1367oN AlE1P-VEI70LE7 0 0 0 1367071 A791 UDL/IIEt A.077 Qa000 47,000 ts676a unnlES Rap a.6ao a6oo ,3oio26 AIxYA71i@WILE s+AOi 207,710 2oaee0 73D7101 NETAI~WIIEO aam 131AO0 laooo 137 TOTAL: 360,706 4M.071 476,170 /3 -,80 CigY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNOB NO. /0 THROUGH W EgT1YATE0 EYPENOITUflE9 '~~ 111Wp 11m/Yl f/90g1 ACTUAL EYPa ADOPfEO EN21W7ED ACCOUNT NUM N PHON EYE BIl EXPENDIN11E1 tao oacAPE MNNr. dsT. n 17anm dNAP A...oiEa u o 170.110D ae~EEm o 0 0 17o•1om A01M2 rn 174 17s 17041m atlPelATlaNS o 1a le7 1004100 ana=e o 0 0 130317+ NAW7a OPei o 7b as 17osm -TREE RVlA127 o m 0 10D~1100 OVFANEAD o m M 190a027 BRV.vANOWeM o 0 260 17oemr eqv-REO LwNr Iao7 a7el a7a1 1700071 MAIN7ANOICPAD o 2Y0 0 1oa7ou ALexPPROeECre o o a 1707011 ALEYP-VBICLE! 0 0 0 1704021 ATER Uf1U1Ni1 ill 2m 100 1901072 UTNJf1E1 N m 100 130 TOTAL: 4.041 1,777 1.767 19o OIClU'E MAINE. qaT. N 17011m oulARauAnEe o 0 0 13a1am 6ENEERa a o 0 17o1ao1 AOW1 9,74e .pu 1,641 1]03000 AOPKMTNkq 66,716 7,000 1.7(10 1703171 1691Nf i0PBi 0 1.Om 1,Om 19D.91W -TREE pPUJHf 1,100 7,000 1,766 1004000 CNEAIFAD 0 776 1,711 1300070 NAW2HYY/CE 0 1.077 1,077 1>ag77 YIV.YNOLIMIRIY7 0 1.000 9,Om 1004071 BIN-1~OIMMIf 10.4m 127,010 207.010 1704024 MUNfANCaCA AO 0 t1,M0 10.110 17070N1 AL lO~.PRO,[Cf 0 0 0 13070M KEXREOUiMM 0 0 0 I3070N AL EOP-VEIICOEt 0 0 0 1704021 AIEq UIRIIIEI 0 16,927 20.000 13DB027 URURE/ 0 0,000 700 100 TOTAL 10/,171 t11.'1i2 306.730' /3- !~f CITY OF RANCHO CUCANI©NGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS NO. 10 TNROUON W 10F2/00 188WY/ 1Y20M1 ACTUAL EXP • ADOPTED ESTIMATED 1 ACCOUNT NUYDES OESCPoPTNNI ENCUY ~ P/E SUODET E7pdDITUREB 1]p DSCAPE YAINf. dar. Tae Vl~~m + ^ • V O IS)/rm SBIEfRa 0 0 D IJ01m, ADAMH aza 72a 7b 170A000 MaOP9M1gNi YM ,a211 2,008 ,]D.t011 MAll7f aoPER o e.7TS 4770 ,vosa •TREERPlM17T /Am eoo 0 Imeom DvERNEAO o mo w ,zoaom zmAVNOLaAVIw,o o aom ,aom ,20a0U 81N-REO AIAIIff 77,a~0 IT7,20 127.20 lavaozo MNNTANDSCPAD o ~,F/6 zaoo ,m7oa aElwaROeECrs ia~eo 0 0 ,~o7oN N.ElfPEOUPMNT o 0 0 ,aoaae ALE7lFTREEB o o a ,zoaml AT®IVraTnEe aem loom loom l2oam2 urA7rlES 1,7,0 7m 1,1l0 uoame ARCAlA1NTBNNCE o 0 0 tmTOTAL 10¢,tq IM.170 174071 7Jii0 DaG1PE Munk. dST. n 7J1JO11m BALAIaEB 0 0 v TJlaolooo SENERTS o 0 0 7J1]D1mt ADAYL o 2,lm 2.lm 7J120am0 aOP61ATIDNi a aaoo 1,Om JJ77DA0]7 AAAMIf •OPEiI o 1Am t,70D TJlaoiwo -raffroLMNr o a,om o 7J,SDlOm OVERIIFAD o 172 A72 7J1]D0020 AYYIiId1ANCE o 1,OR1 v rJlmaoa avvNaalAaaa o zYe o 7J17ol0'a am~xawlw7 0 1aYf o 7J170007D NASRA2108C/AD o a0N o 7J171rW~ AL E1lP•FRO.ECTB 0 0 0 7J170.70M KEIPEDlAR1Nf 0 0 0 7J,70.7016 ALE,a-VBaCEt D o 0 7J10Dam1 ATER UItJTIEB 0 ta7M 0 7J176lD77 UTalT1E1 0 700 0 7J17o TOTAL o arum aelz /3 -,BQ Ci'~Y O€ RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDB NO. AO TNROUDN W 100W00 100y01 /NNi1 ACTWLf7fP• ADOPTED EBiIWTED ACCCNIM NDYBEA DESCRIPf10N FJid1Y ~ FYE Bl16DkT EYPENDTfUREfI 130 IMIN7. DIR. H 13611M MAAP LI~OKC y 7061200 glEFITO 0 0 0 10610p AOOWI 0 2p 2p 13DA100 fOPEiN71dY 0 1.1p 130 IOOS7/ MANRAX@I 0 p p 19PJOq •TIIEE IPlAN7 0 1N0 0 1705000 OYBOIEAD 0 0 0 1700027 LIN•VNOLlY7111q 0 610 0 1700016 fYN.71EO YA1NT o aa7 0 f7DE0ao AMNITAJIOBCPAD 0 216 0 f 760011 A14A UIRJilE3 0 f!w 0 f7ae6u urxlDEe o Ifa a I7o7otA~ 6 e,aaa Ye 10 FACDITIE6: ffgEET UO11Tf1 L C(fV>n UOIRe M7.Op 0 123,Op TOTAL M7,Op 0 123,000 130 ON71ND Oil/1MCT / 1301001 AOIMN 7~A70 57,730 37,700 1701002 0 0 0 1760000 OVEpEAO 0 7.106 4,136 7760010 .aRV•aEa YNNr 3.Ip o 1,011 1760072 UNJTIE~ ae,ee7 71.000 70.000 170 TOTAL• t00.p6 17/A10 171,p0 /3- BR GlTY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA ePECIAI REVENUE FUN08 NO. M TNROUON N E6TIYATED EYPENDITURER w /MN10 1060M/ 1610N1 ACRNLL F7IP• ADOPTED E817WTED I 1f.C.O11NT NtlY9EN OE61TP11~Y ENCYY ~ FYE BLOOET EYOEMM711PE6 190 OWI1N0 p6TRICT2 1961001 AOINN 'lD.UI 11,661 tY,011 1961002 0 0 0 1]D6100 OV2161EM 0 2,927 2,927 196ao26 1SRWflEO NA1Nf 6,6Q1 0 1,ne 19o6oa u11u11Ee e1,7ao Ie,aao 73.am 190 TOTAL' 4,162 tltlt 1D,om •790 MI71N0 gR16Cf 9 /1961001 86-f3ff A01AIN 70,070 18,W 13,611 X1]09600 JOPENITM)N6 0 0 0 X1760100 OBIBUL OVH6FAD 0 1,7K 1,712 I170007D eRVAEO MUM 1,167 0 167 •7906022 UIIUTIEB 67.696 66,200 60800 ~119o TOTAL: 70.199 72,760 76,717 /3-~S G[TY OF RANCHO CEFCAMONOA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS NO. 10 THROUGH N M 1988/80 tO80J91 1808181 ACTWLEOVi ADCW7E0 EBTIWTED ACI:WNT NUYBER OEBCRI-f10N ENCUY ~ FYE BUDGET EOIPENODUPEB 180 ONDMB p81RCi 4 1361001 AOYO'/ ~~~ ~"+~ '~"' 1300000 A7PERO7100N 0 0 0 1wa9oo weINFAO a 1.M7 1,100 17081028 env.REDw19tr 9.911 o Ili 1368079 UT61REt ig787 30.000 40.000 130 TOTA4 12008 tl,m8 360M 170 OOTNO gBTRICT 6 1761001 AOMN 2700 1,080 I.MD 1J03000 fOPONT10N8 0 0 0 17000D0 OVERHEAD 0 618 670 1]680'm BINAEO WINE Yl7 0 01 19D~0071 URU71E8 7.eM 6000 17,000 13ororA~: 12x7 1691e 19.344 170 dRWO DIBTBCfB 1761001 ApON 2222 8.030 eA80 1301000 JDFE/NTIONe 0 0 0 1300000 OVERHEAD 0 717 717 13D0078 8B118CE8 0 0 0 13DlOa UIWIIEi 1870 1,800 1,000 130 TOTAL• 7.814 10,700 10.300 /3 -BT CITY O~ liANCHO CUCAM6PIGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUN08 NO. 10 THROUON 0t ERTIYATED EYPEMOITUREA r 1NIPJYO /PYWY1 1W0/Y7 ACTUAL EYP• ADOPTED EeTIWTED 1 AGC1N1Nf NUYBEP DE>lCRIPTIOM ENTYAY ~ FYE DUDDET EYPEND[iUREs 1-i1]D ONRMP M~)g1'f T •f061001 ADMMI 0 0 0 T1TJ0.1000 JOPBNTK)NB o 0 0 I7]DEYDO OVEWIEAO o 0 0 ~Taeme amHCEe o 0 0 IT~610GP UTAJTIEB o 0 0 T~aTaoTmw o 0 0 ~Tm aNRNO olsnllcr n TaDTaoT OOMBifADMN o 0 0 -Ny0,yY00 Nf./OPHL1710N8 0 0 0 T,pyOp OVEWIF.AO D 6 0 •Twaoao BERNCEB o 0 0 •Taoeao2 ununea o 0 0 ~TaoTOrA~ 0 0 0 ti0 !PT CAPR'AL IYPIpVE11ENf T06E07A BEnVICFA sz+a o s.reT T]O TOTAL lt.ue o sz~ei /3-,~d CITY OF ElANCHO CUCAiNQNCA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS NO. 4O TNROUGH W EBTIYATEO EYPENOITUpEB r fYE0/Y0 /Y0WY1 fY0{V01 ACFWLL E7(P• AOOPFEO EB'f1Y11TE0 F A NF NUMBER DEQCRITON ENCUY BUDOEf W EIWOMpO1KD iW 1~ lL2ETVO4HlWDMM 1]0007b SERVICES (ABEEO AOIW/t $EOF 0 IO,OG7 i~OTOTAI: 77,Ep1 0 '10.006 NZ E7WONWOIYD IMP amfi aERRCEt 9ruNrJ ~ o rDnu. 0. 0 f ao FD a-a F~ooweFEC aeT 1361x01 BBNENf AOMIN 0 Lreo 1,160 N1966Y00 NfAOPEf1AT1OH8 0 0 0 1367910 AYLAENTe TO TRIHfEE 0 tO1,JM 0 130 TOTAL 0 193.9E6 1,160 /3-,e V CITY OF RANCHd CUCAI~SdNGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNOS NO. b TNROUGH 66 190N00 /NOA9/ 19WN1 ACTUAL EXP6 ADOPTED E871W7ED i IYBER DEBCPoPf1ON FJlCDY ~ F/E BUOf1Ef OlPENDRUREe 130 FD 00-2 UW D/FgN:. 1361001 8061ENTAOIgN - x. w,,wr.6u) M6OPE11ATIONB 0 6,SS9 0 1366900 OlNEMI.OVERFIEAD 0 0 0 1367010 AYTAENf6 roTRUQiff 0 0 0 1>D TOTAL: 0 0.770 621 • 1/ a D8f YS AITA LOW g1AlY1EL D9T 61R ALTA LOW GIWL OAYHt) -1100 WLAiI PAYROLL 10.100 0 10.000 -009! OIN-i1ED MNNf 166,061 0 1.000 .70W AL E7(P-PIq,ECfB 0 0 0 rorAL: 21o,.a o So,am 1.1130 sosr6uanEDalPrwp 1JI361001 BSMENf ADWN 1,000 0 0 -It3oYOTAL t,a00 0 0 1617 O6T6s218EDEMPRDM 11687-1001 B6AENTAOYIN o 1,OOp 1,000 f ~037JWD Nf L OPEINTION6 0 3A60 0 i N17b000 OVERFIEAO o 0 3.610 t~16T7-79t0 AWAEM6TO 7H1HItE 160,0 1M,M7 16/p67 1~O37 TOTAL: 106,093 100,337 190,331 /3 -,BJJ acv ~~ sawcw~ cucaawow~a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNOB NO. 10 TNROUON N EBTINATEO FYPEMOITIREe ~ 101WY0 1NB/H 1900N1 ACIIML E1R • AOORFD ESTIWTEO 1 ACCOUNT NUYBER OE9CRIP!ION ENCIIN ~ NL NIMFT miYm~ mC~ 8. dsT. t9)1 Illl R INWBTIWLL 190 OUR. @n ~IH HfO1O (ApEtAOL~ 1961001 AOMN. 0 0 0 190 TOTAL 0 0 0 & dar. 1T1 OIN 8f NO 1M1JN1) -1100 FAY11011 9A09 00.9/i ID,910 -1 W0 BQIE~RB 0 Y1.11Y 21,111 ams eERV1oES 20.n0 mam 960,x00 Torsi: a,m 66sa1 x1,,96 ~ dsrENO16EEWN0AONIN aaa servlcEa l,ln,2a o toe6a61 TOTAL 7,117317 0 2A06,9~1 i3-a~ CITY OF RAl+lCNJ CUCAM~N~A SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDB NO. M THROUGH W ~TIYATED ETPENDITUREB w /M4J40 1440/41 /440/01 ACTUAL IXP• ADOPTED ESNWTED f wuu4sw oEacwvnoN ENCUY ~ TYE TwooEr ExaENpTUREa s pn 4L7 1700 p4T. K/(A44E0 AD44M J100.1001 Ap4N. 0 4,000 4p00 Jfb TOML 0 4,000 4,000 J677 & p4T. Kt (IIEDEL1PTtDty J477 7400 . a OP6MTION4 0 000 0 M37d400 WOENBNL OVEp1EA0 0 0 000 JO77.7410 AYNBlfB TO TRU4IEE 1.440.000 1.106AOD 1.104,600 J437 TOTAL 1,400,000 1~tOg000 1.104.000 A14(pDTI40f b IIENTAQE I 17a D44 HERRAOEIMP P144E4 Apw !70.1001 SERVICEL 41,634 0 b 130 TOTAL 41,474 0 0 44 FEMADE ILFR tMUN~ -0b74 891VI(.'E8 74.164 0 3Y,~.t6 TOTAL' 38164 0 32,136 /3-~Bl~ .~ CITY pF AANCHO CUCAM©NGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS NO. a0 TNROUON N w /YaPA0 1aY0N1 iBPp/al ACTWLL E7~ • ADOPTED EBTIAVITED F ACCOUNT NUMBER t]E9[:MEINIM curlw.eve APo( DIB19KCf b RED NILL IYPR(WUI/1) ~ tiEAVIOEB ~ 0 M,]t!a TOTAL• M7Da o M,7e6 ARK pBT M REP WU/NERTUIOE RE tJO ARK daT.MREDENP (AaBEB ADNIM t9P10a1 9aNENTADMIN a7.as1 sf,aw sT.3M 1]6ai00 WDENERN.OV6INEAD o 0 0 190T0TAL: a7,aD1 a7.SM sT.aM Ap(plif, a6 IREOEMVRON) JY10 A1'MENf TO TRUSTEE lW,~ aW,Ma aW,w9 TOTAL: ~~~ ~.~ a07 ~ AR(DISf. M REDBAPO~N<1 atoo (iUtMBALARIES a m,ew u.eoa ^s0° D o 0 nano ARRTIMEWARIE! o B o ~ o stew m,ea9 o lapTIDN~ ~~ 0 0 0 0 aoas ' 0 0 ~t ATBII11A111EY 0 0 I~a073 IRKJREB D 9 rota: o at,aoT T'1,7aa 0 AIII(p8T es REOEMPItON (RNNaF) ~" Dar taaaae o 0 Tofu: telLOS o 0 /3- 8Z dlTY dF RANCHd GUCAMdtidA BPECIAL NEVENUE fUNDB NO. b TNROUON W EBTIYATED EYVENDITIIRE! M tOMAO 100WY1 100WYf ACTlI1LL F7P• ADO/fEG EORIWTED i ENP7W ~ A'E ^11[NIET EYPBIMWIHB 1~a0/ Ault pDf 06 REOERVE FUNO .~i~uw ~rwroetlp101R 0 0 N1,161 .1001 TOTAL: 0 0 i{1,161 t10MENf p~7gCf 02-IR 170 DHTA2.IR REDBi g60E6AONly 1]D1001 A[MiN Am N6 !0 17P]O10 AYAE//fT0'fRU87EE 0 A7.II78 7M,7N 170 TOTAL: M6 770.175 7K,176 8 OBf 6b1R flE0[i/P PANMi) ,7000 10PEItATM7N0 OM 0 0 •5000 OBIEINL OVERHEAD 0 0 0 •7010 AYL1BlfTOTlNIitEE 7M.{77 0 0 TOTAL• 750.{06 0 0 /3 - Cl~ CITY QF RANCHO GUGAMQNGA SPECIAL REVENUE FUNOS NO. t0 TNROUON W ESTIYAT D YpENDITURES a t0aala0 19WA11 Ia00M ACTW1L E71P8 ADOPTED ESITIN7ED R ~C[:OIINT NIiYRFG DFBt7tlpTYOM FW!IMY~{11F IYIMLT FYOFYMNY9E~ B DST ass RA: OIW W1ciE gBfRICf •1106 OUIM BYANE6 21$q 0 07,000 JOOD ~~u1'e11 ... ~ <ROa aRV•IEO OAM11f aAY 0 OAa1 ~70q Al k70'•PRO.ECIT 0 0 0 TOTAL A,aDi 201.17/ tl.861 MafRIN7f aaa 100 SOST aO$REOBAP (AaSEa AOOary 1761061 AOMSI 1,1Y /,7M x,10{ 170.1006 IOPEMTIONa 0 1,OOD 0 17D'A00 OVERHEAD 0 0 1,000 176Af0 AVMENfe TO TRUSTEE 7I,Q60 Y12a0 112W7 176 rorAL• 79A1~ 110811 zlaall s Der s2 REDBAP lLNwO a9oo •DPEM710Na Tae o 0 ~607~7970 AYMT3lf TOTWSTEE 100,000 0 0 TOTAL 111,196 0 0 /3 - G'r8 ~~ _~ . -. MAY 01 REC'U d~A ~~ V s,.~ d n°.~ R G .~ 0 MfKtlftll Aft ~ il~wA 1. T/ltll b uCOrfA! flit NO. fr Otft•YtM1 N A11rre~;~ lplM/.y Or /fti piLL M1fIS fewtr., Cr1.1JfN ~,..,.«,.., ~Y mot Jsn h ~4AI.IIf~tw b~ttltreiMwMt..~ 4J i NAAIgl1 b AIIICAMIq >~' ti'W ~,,. Yer.... »rl AffY1 Yrv fc tO11 ptr f~ pets 5-1-f1 fuOO, JWl ~ Mt(S7 b ifAWA[IIOWA IE IC. 111E It he.Z~t. + 11>f.00 t1 cr u 4 grNW~ uric. LIB. x Wr..N MYr-NrIr. ~J Yw~ fe» fe.e-lu u». ~r..wr ~d. fn>r W roru t1:>A.ff u. A/rYS+ ~. W •r tq ~e .Y~Ir w wr Ysirl p..~o..a bn r M a.+ftab« a . 1...t.., w (YI Yr ti of M ANNt v a. ~ MW M V NNw1 twY N 11. FaYM.t N M AkWYe Ywny Cam~vl Act. U. 9AII b f.YIpHY CArry'N ._ V~!!!W _.._..~__..__..__pw_..__ tlf-fl__._..__ .. n,.. v, ~ ~.,. r, « w~. r w~+ ~e, ~ ~~ M «t.ir ~ *. ~+v- ~ r ~~.«ti~ ~Y tY rwW~.weY.~u.~w~•^,«~,y~b~.. ~. M.rAV.w ~4~ ~ Yy. F ~i I .V r/. ~wr~ rr 4 ~~ F ~r Y w.~ . « i~~ ~~ . „M~ FM1 w Y MWi iA .1If11tAN1 f1p111t~<..---1~ _~Ji_-- --------------- •rrue~n~ n nwwoi u snn n tuwraA awr r____Jt~____..._-_.or_.___~,1!lt..._.._ ~ ~ tY..~"Y '.~ :.Arm. ~..rA,:. ~ Wes.-+~:r.*• ~ :«.~r~". u' ~»~+. r :.u.,'. ~.« «r. ter. rrt ..~ r « ..r.• r. r+. -ate w .~ ...r-+ Y~ I ~ ~J. Y w++l 4 ~, MWi ~Y «. «.~,. ~~ . ~r•t ~. ~ « r4...Yt, «^,~ I . V ,. w NY ~~, ~r~ i w A~ ~Yr Aw. r.r. « «, ~ w.Y « Y iY ~Y « Yrr•, w • wY.Y ~~.~ ~ ~ ti 1.,rr M,..A~ ~ ~ «.., ~ ~. ^r .,r..t rani i~ ti « ~F ,y.,r ~ r .awn F w~ r ...,.. « t.,.. a . ~..Y~. e+w . r r..r 0.1W1>fNr 1LYrr f}Y Wt Iw 0.l Un ONE AtYtlui ®raif web, '/I-/' ~. p/ew6Fr. N__~~.1/r ~-__ _~__I>1r•..___J-yp.fyJtnMt14___..ffTSfL- ._.c.plit±_ _ ..Y --------- -- ~y - - - -- - --- --- ESTACIA CL ~ , r N f Q FLOWER ~ ^ a NVIOILL oL6u. I •~ CARL'S I o LIQUOR a ~ n c ~ m BofA I ~ I_._~ m I o c uo y 0 I m CARL'S LIQUOR APNN208-261-51 9677 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Property Currently Zoned: Special Commercial-Foothill Specific Plan Area 3 Zoning of Adjacent Property: North: Special Commercial-Foothill Snecific Paln Area 3 South: Medium Residential East: Community Commercial-Foothill Specific Plan Area 3 West: Commercial/Office-Foothill Specific Plan Area 3 ~S S. Ramirez 6-4-91 COPYwr'--- - rr.r. ....._...._ _. .. MAY 01 rE~l; T •~ V L O 0 ~. C .~ •` O tFNliiEtlBY tld atie4114f5t ~ IKIf ~ { 1, x~,ai ~ ;;~,+43i HIE rb. - _ - rr wrbrN r .,_.... Err+r t +N Ipl wd..r novelle. >r~S fJi rS on su,e oEHrau acvx Ho. Sa]a~] , , tlu Yb uM lA ~ tl ~~ 4 tY90 coxoxrxaxAl n m rn rw Y YP E ., ooro urlMriW YHMu aaJOltIYV 1ls brtl :. wawa ar Anuc.Nrta *"' ~ ~ ouAGW1IJ.1, cbAra o. ,11'_.x. 5~, spy ~~ 1/11/91 ~ [IMwOw 1. TYIE(fI OF TEANSAGIWWEI ~ IIC __ TY1! iO ser 1,ann. uo xl ~< umu.1 r.. aa1.1o APDIY McrlPtr It6]Otl Ane --.. .. .._~ fRJfa 4 lydm N MI~.tMir N L1r ]TV Vlderla reset Lnr ml ~ Lr Cr4 Garr a. m 1 ~ i' , .r to~~ _ _ ro ru _ Slrr IYra d l'rrr I ~, l~ Y~ Ytt l AWxq AIMr AI dlixrll bar!)~r and SIIr II.m11M1 9. Ilor. Yr' wr brn amrl[lii N a ldq) r Irtllyfrt N IM 0.yerroyq qr. ~ 1. e.alun e'Y6' m~wr ro Iro.u r r 10 m m aHe1M.M .NIA JwM b drW Or. N Nib ^PPknSe.. 1]. Algliml wrr lol rAN my *rroT ~aiu1YJ 'x »mb Snnvd pmiw dH bn.t ntl Nu queiRawler N a F..mm, a.d Ib) IAaI b al r r... r rmr r arw ro b walerod d Ev gavlYnm N Ero Abdptll tl.r.rm Cmnd M. 11. STAiF d UIIIObYA cemry d.____. FIVI'=cl~Y________________Oa...__..A/2i(91..______... __ ~..u~ nom.. +r". ~I~ war. ~i~A.m w+, u.,. . ^n~a~ r r.~~+r~~rw~~ ..~ru n r. u...~~.~ ~...ur . ~ w~i..~.r• i~'..~ ~ ~,n~ ~_ rr..r. rr~..,.. rL AIrI1UNx +' y In ry • - - •• +r,r •rrtltmlon ~r n~EUlutw If. SaAIE p UIIIOhNA tamM d.-.._____....._____________________Urw_____._.....____....._____ u.r rr y~ rr..wr~ ~ W.r w wb. ~.wr., ti ~•nr~ ~r.i~in ~w w 4Jr ~i. +n+xn r..r~ r,r ~ w ~wr w ~ r.t~+a~l w w r .+w uw ~~:r' ~ .~... w .~ aw.... ~".., :*-+r.`..w~r_ ~ .~.. ...w . w. ':.~ +' ~ .:ter u ~.. v `...~... r ~`..: _ ~ .ate.-+`.. Ib Nr FNb blre TEi W; Fr DrranrN Ur O.IE ^ rd.da,y raPrb ^ _________________________~. ____.--.__________._CdItlS MAXfD ________...-_--.~~(yE_.-.___._.-.___ ln.nd: rm d._-.___.-!d~ N___-_._________________Ob m__-______._lYry1 Na. ,__..._.___......._ ....,, ~,.~ - - __.__ ~ ~ ~ .m~ w DURGHALLI, GHP.ZI D. APN# 227-111-41 91739 Property Currently Zoned Village Commercial -Victoria Planned Community Zoning of Adjacent Properties; North Nedium High Residential 14/24 DU's A -Victoria Planned Community South High Residential 24/30 DU,s A -Victoria Planned Community Medium Residential 4/14 DU's A East Low-Medium Residential 4/8 DU's A -Victoria Planned Community West P1edium High Residential 14/24 DU's A -Victoria Planned Community 1, 31may1991 joetorrez L'I'I'Y UN' E.ANCHO CL'CAiLIONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Jerry B, Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNUAL LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT FEE FOR THE COLLECTION OF ASSE38I1IENT9 WITFIIM THE ALTA LOMA CHANNEL DISTRICT (842), THE 3D[TIi STREET INDUSTRW. PARK REFUND uwixiGt• tai-in) n1vD ~rH!•; RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 86-2 Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the annual levy of an assessment management fee of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel assessment per parcet for the expenses incurred in the collection of assesamente within the Alta Loma Channel District (842), the Sizth Street Industrial Park Refund District (82-1R) and the Rancho Cucamonga Storm Draia District (8&2). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes the City of Rancho Cucamonga to collect an annual assessment management fee of a ma~timum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and not to exceed eizteen dollars per parcel assessment. Rather than calculate the fee on a percentage basis, staff has determined that a fiat five dollar fee per parcel will cover the cost incurred in the collection of the assessments. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga a comprehensive management program including record keeping, coat management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public is funded from this fee. Respectfiilly subm~jitted, e~wood /i` y• ' Deputy City Manager JBF:de Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 955 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY ~' OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSE3 INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT llISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Lnprovement Act of 1913" lwinv T:..:..:..., in _c .v. ~• •..o ~:+rn;in and iiighwaya i:oae of the State of California, and has confirmed raesessmenfa upon land within various special ae9aeement districts (hereinafter collectively referred to ae the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, as Proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid asseasmente within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City dcee incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 dcee authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its eapenaes of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dcee hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above re©tals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five dollars ($5,00) per parcel for the eapenaes incurred in the collection and administration of assessments within the districts, Said exgenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative eapenaea of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current informatiou regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County auditor in hie or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. ~Q SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the' Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the asaesswente. .~ ~a i'iT}' ilF Rr1tit'110 t_'li('nhli?NGa STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Ian. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer ~UG0:70'y`+ 9 ~' + n < > LL T ~ ~p HI ~ ! i2 J > iw; SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO F[ND THE DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMDANY. SURETY FOR THE BARMAKIAN C0IPANY, TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL iMP 13394, IN DEFAULT OF PERFORMANCE BOND NOS. 983230-5 AND 983116-5 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO CAUSE THE STREET ANO STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND APPERTAIN NORK COVERED BY SAID BONDS TO BE COIPLETEO AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE BARMAKIIW COITANY AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY TO RECOVER ALL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY, INCLUDING ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE DEVELOPERS AND/OR SURETY'S FAILURE TO COMPLY, IN CAUSING THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE COMLETED PURSUANT TO THE lMPROVEIENT AGREEMENi RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council find Developers Insurance Company in default of Perfonaance Bond Nos. 983430-5 and 983116-5 for the improvement of streets, stone drains and appertain work located at the north most corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 13394. It is further recommended that City Council authorize the City Engineer to cause the satd improvements to be completed pursuant to the Improvement Agreement, approved plans and specifications. It 1s also retoamended that City Council authorize legal staff to take action to cause the Developer, The Barmakian Company, and the surety, Developers Insurance company, to reimburse the City for all costs incurred in causing the completion of the improvements including all damages Incurred resulting from the incompletion of the leprovements pursuant t0 the Improvement Agreement. Per staff's recommendation, L1ty Council at the regular Council meeting of June 5, 1991, found the Developer, The Barmeklan Company, in default of the Improvement Agreement. Per the staff report, the surety, Developers Insurance Company, was given an opportunity to take action towards causing the improvements to be completed. The surety was given until June 14, 1991, to respond to Lhe City's request. Pursuant to the Improvement Agreement, the C/ty has the right to cause the provisions of CITY COUNCIL STAfP REPORT TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL NAP i"s394 June 19, 1991 Page 2 the Agreement t0 be met and recover from the Developer and/or his surety the foil cost and expense Incurred if the Developer fails or neglects to comply wfth the provlslons of the AgreeaH•nt. Per staff's recomeendation, City Council found the Developer to be in default of his construction pernalt at the regular City Council meeting oP April 17, 1991, and authortzed the City Engineer to cause the iniproveennts to be caepleted. Since that date, staff Ms attempted 1:0 work with the Developer and hts contractor 1n ceustng the completion of the improvements. The Developer and hts surety has also been given an opportunity to respond. At this time, no work has commenced and no acceptable proposal for campleting the work has been received by the Ctty. Therefore, staff Delteves that all steps have been taken to allow the Developer, his contractor and his surety the opportunity to caeply and recommends that City Council direct the City Engineer to cause the provlslons of the Improvement Agreement to be met by arty lawful means. Respectfully submitted, ~~~(.~~ NJO:IT: sd Attachment as C1TY aF lta;ticao c~~caalo3ca STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mgyor, and Meabers of the City Council Jack Law, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, Ctty Engineer Rr: Judv Acnata. Enalneerlne Technician e`~3-. SUBJECT: ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY, LOCATED NEST Oi MALACHITE AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BQULEYARD It is recommended that Lily Council adapt the attached resolution ordering to be vacated a portion of an alley located west of Malachite Avenue alai south of Foothill Boulevard and that the Ctiy Clerk shall cause same to record. ANALYSIS/BACK6ROUND On January 10, 1991, Planning Cov1551on approved Conditional Use Permit 88- 28, which is located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue. The property owner is proposing the development of a 5,380 square foot retail building within the existing shopping center. The site is currently vacant and ices immediately east of the existing Perry's Market shopping center. The Cendtttons of Approval for this project requ/re that the existing alley that abuts the southern property line of this site be vacated prior to the issuance of 6u11d1ng per•tts. The subject alley right-of-why 1s 10 feet wide and l1d.82 feet long. Nhen the existing alley is removed, it will be replaced with landscaping and the existing drive approach onto MalacMte Avenue will 6e removed and replaced with City Standard curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Notices have been posted at the site and the public hearing date was published 1n the newspaper. Respectfully suhml fed, ~ ~~~~- Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:JM:dI w Attachments: Resolution - Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B' RESOLUTION N0. LJi' I a -I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY W RANCHO CUCAMON6A, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, r~ ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF AN ALLEY LOGTED NEST OF MALACH[TE AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD NNEREAS, by Resolution No. 91-132, passed on May 15, 1991, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a portion of a City allay hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.a. on June 19, 1991, in tM City Council Chabars, located at iuouu civic enter breve, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the tleie and pt ace for hearing all persons ob,~ecting to the proposed vacation; aM NHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said timo and place, and there were mo protests, oral or written, to such vacation. NOa, THEREFORE BE !T RESOLVED Dy the Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds ail the evidence subeltted that a portion o an a ey located west of Melachlte Avenue and south of Foothill Boulevard 1s unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No. Y-105 on file to the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal descriptlan which 75 attached hereto, eutrked Exhibit 'A', and by reference jade a part thereof. SECTION 2: The sub,~ect vacation shall be subject to the reservations and excep obi ns, T}' any, set north to ExAtblt 'B', which 1s attached herein aiM by reference wade a part hereof. SECTION 3: The Clerk shell cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recor n the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this reso upon; and 1t shall thereupon take effect and be 1n force. ~4 EXHIBIT "A" ALLEY VACATION" The south 10.00 feet of the following described Parcel of Land: '1'naL portion oz Lne nortneaeL 1/4 Of Lne ROTtheaBL 1/4 of 8ect10n 10, township 1 south, range 7 west, Sen Bernardino Baee and Meridian, being a portion of said northeast 1/d of Section 10, marked "Martinovich" as shown on map of Cucamonga Lands, as par plat recorded in book 4 of Maps, page 9, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of said Section 10; thence south 00° 03' 12" east, 331.04 feet to the northwest corner of Tract No. 5121, as per plat recorded in book 6d of Maps, page 18, records of said County; thence north 89° 59' 07" east, 144.82 feet to the center line of Malachite Avenue, ea shown on said map of Tract No. 5121; thence north 00° 03' S2" west, 331.02 feat to the north line of Section 10; thence south 89° 59' 30" west, 144.78 feet to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the County of San Bernardino, a body corporate and politic, by deed recorded December 30, 1960 in book 5317, page 1, Official Records. =,~rF`Cj '`~ No. 24263 * ,E,yo /Z-31-~ ~t /'>` -- - --~-f - --- Nw COM NC qt NC iH fCt i0 f 001HILL sea°s[ b'w I~C_ .... lii ip' x ~~° l !` Od r0 l1~a C~ 5 Pn~~ A11[A !O S[ vACA![0 a S ACC,"~~~' i~'!~• 242G3 ,I ~~ eouLevaAO W 2 w a I' * ~p,/d_8/-R3 ry ~_ ~z%!ui i 1 f /• ii .~i' ~ Q` CRUfOd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ENCaINEERING DIVISION t W V J t Z e0 8 i ~E~ CUP B8-2B tinE: VACATION EXMBlT: n,mv n.. o e n.n•,n n . STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 C1 T0: Mayor and Ne~bers of the C11y Council U City Manager FROM: W~a. Jce O'Ne11, C1ty Engineer BY: N1111e Vaibuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEIUTION TO LANDSCAPE M1NItNAMLE DlSTR1CT N0. 3 ANO STREET UGHTIMG M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 8 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 13707, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EIGHTH STREET AND BAILER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL INVESTMENT COMPANY. i RECOMNEIN111TIOM It is recaaee~ed that Lity Council adopt the attxhed resoiutions approving Parcel Map 13707, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 8 6, and authorizing the C1ty Clerk to cause save to record. Parcel Map 13707, located at the northeast corner of Eighth Street and Baker Avenue, 1n the General Industrial (subarea 1) of the Industrial Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Ca~isston on January 23, 1991, for the division of 2.25 acres into one parcel. The off-site tagrovea~ents are existing already. C.C. 8 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attornry and Planning Division. The consent and waiver to Mnexation forty signed by the Developer is on ftle in the City Cleric's office. Respectfully subnl ~~ 0~ .D ~~ ~ f~ v' NJO:NV:~h AttachNent 1 #g f RESOLUTION NO. ~f/-/(o~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONBA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 PARCEL MAP NUMBER (TENTATIVE PARCEL IMP N0. 13707) NHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13707, submitted by Mtchael Investment Campagy, and consisting of 1 parcel, located at the northeast corner of Eighth Street and Baker Avenue was approved by the Planning Cameission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on January 23, 1991, and 1s 1n Giinyi --~- - - 3T. ~y r~w.~ uuv r3,.a~ vi u; udida ;w. w adopted pursuant to that Act;~and~ NHEREAS, Parcel Nap Number 13707 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and NHEREAS, all of the requtrearents established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by approval of the C.C. 8 R.'s. NO~i, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCNO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Parcel Map No. 13707 be and the same 1s hereby approved and the City Engineer 15 authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. a~ RESOLUTION N0. 9/'~~OI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R11NCH0 CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN ~' TERRITORY TO LANDSCADE M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IRIS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL HAP 13707 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance dl5trtct pursuant to the terms of the `Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", beangg Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Htghwgys Code of the State of California, said aye".ial .eini.anm,~u uiairi~i. snuwn anu uesigneieu as Landscape risinunance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landueping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of addtttonal territory to the Maintenance 0l strict; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to anrrex the property deurtbed on Exhlblt "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; arM NHEREAS, ail of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Mnlntenanee District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLYES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this leglslatlve bogy hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown 1n Exh161t "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B" attached hereto t0 the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, tnduding~evy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ~q ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRIGT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~~ ~ i A.T. ? 5. I'• FA I~poI.O SITE-PM./8707 E I G N l M d a i LL' ( Q +~ y 2 q L y. _~~ ~.- . ~, R/~-I sTFEET ~ff2 3 CITY O~ RANCIiO CIICAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PM /707 S7~T~ fl~ CA'~7F3~331~IA E%HIDIT 'D' PROJECT NAME: PARCEL MAP 13707 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 2.25 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 4.5 ~" " STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of LauDS_ to be Mnexed District No. 590UL -95WL -~6-~_~~ 27,500 5 _ _ _ _ LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT Caerunity Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Nape EQUest.Tra11 Sa• ft. Sa. ft. Ea. 3 WV:6/19/91 ~V CITY OF RANCHO C1fCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mgyor and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract Civil Engineer e~ , SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IWORYEIENT SECURITY AND _ w ...r ryuurryet rnu rn i mn<rmc wa IYTLwaYri nT CTRTr.T N11. 4 AND STREET LIOHTIM6 NIIINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 13825, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND NILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LENTS DEVELOPMENT COIPANY gECOREJOATIOM It 15 recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel MoD 13825, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. ~ and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said nap to record. AMALYSIS/BACK811lA11D Parcel MoD 13825, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, in the Neighborhood Coowerctal Development District of the Terra Y15ta Planned Community, was approved Dy the Planning Coamisston on February 13, 1991, for the division of 13.9 acres into 30 parcels. The Developer, Lewis Names of California, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site gmprovements in the following amounts: Faithful Perfornsnce Bond: 5302,555.00 labor and Material Bond: 5151,277.00 Monumentatlon Cash Bond S 2,900.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. C17Y COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 13825 - LENTS DEVELOPMENT CO June 19, 1991 Page 2 Letters of approval have been received frrom Cucamonga County Nater Olstrict."" The Consent and Naiver to Mnexation fors signed by the Developer is also on f11e in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully subaitted, (r .. Nm. Joe O'Neil C1ty En9lneer NJO:LEH:d)w Attachments 32 RESOLUTION N0. (~,. ~(D y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC[L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CULAMON011, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 DARCEL MAP ^' NUMBER 13825, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Farces Map No. 13825, submitted by Lewis Development Company, and consisting of 10 parcels located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, befog a division of 13.9 acres of land in the ~e;y6i,or'nuuu Cu~aerciai ixvei opment U1 S[r1Ci Of tIM Terri Y1sta Pl annad Casmunity was approved by the Planning Co~laslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 13, 1991, and 1s 1n campllanee with the State Subdivision Map Act end Local Ordtnance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Mep No. 13825 is the Final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prereQulsite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now bean net by entry Into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Iprovement Security by Lew15 Development Company as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, hlghwAy and resoled Mghway purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLYES, that said Improvement Agreement aM said Improvement Security submitted by said developer ba and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attast; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 13825 is hereby approved and the City Engineer 15 authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 33 RESOLUTION N0. 9/.~(p3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~' RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNElWTION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREET LIOHTIN6 WIINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL M1P 13825 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeanga, California, has previously formed a special aalntenance district pursuant to the terns of the "Landscaping aM Lighting Act of 1972", beang Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets aM Highways Code of the State of California, said ~~.....• ''~`'i"-6 e.Sir ;vv wrwwn and u051 gnaua a5 Landscape MaintenarlCe 0lstrict~No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District"); and " NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 oP the Landscaping and LigAtltrg Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property destrlbad on Exh161t `A' attxhed hereto aM incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District hove flied with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and Aeartng or filing of an Engineer's 'Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this 1eg151ative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper y as shown 1n Exhibit "A' and the work progran areas as described to Exhibit "B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. including SEC~TITof all assesuswaentsroshatinbe applicabentoathe territry annexed hereunder. 3y EXHIBIT •A' ASSESSMENT plAaRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~' ~-i-~ I~ J1/j~^Irq~ I~~/ \~~ ~' I I'ri /I~ I ` .. ~,41T~~', ~~ ~I~ r ''~1 ~,'r~;,~ ~ ~ r~ ;1 ~ visa .' L .': =~ ~~}~ r! 'm rvo ia~si CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO • ~N1I~x:,-- ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA x -- E101I8IT °B' PROJECT NAME: PARCEL MAP 13825 ND. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 13.87 ac N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 27.74 units Parcel 1 3.92 acres Parcel 6 1.52 acres Parcel 2 1.42 acres Parcel 7 1.30 acres Parcel 3 0.21 acres Parcel 8 0.50 acres Parcel 4 0.25 acres Parcel 9 1.29 acres Parcel 5 0,60 acres Parcel 10 2.86 acres TOTAL: 13.87 acres CT DriT I TrJlTT11L' WIYT[WW'F pTfTDTrT No. of L s t0 be Mnexed D15trtct No. ~_ ~_ 1 __- __.. 22 1 --- 4 -_- -_- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE DISTRICT CaetunlLy Turf District No. Street Nose Eouest.Traii Sg. ft• 4 Nilltken Ave. --- --- Ellena Nest --- --- Terra Yista ParkTyy East --- --- Base Ltne --- --- LEH/6-19-91 Ground Cover Trees Sa. ft. Ea. --- 13 --- za --- 20 --- 23 3~ CiT ~ OF H1L>yLHu L'UC;a141pSGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 TU: Mayor and McWers of Ctty Council Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, Ctty Engineer BY: Paul A. Raugeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of a Joint Use Agreement with Southern California Edison Campagy for relocation and installation of electrical transmission lines from a utility easement to > cr,..r .>"._.~_... ~~~ ine ease side of Rochester Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard. RECONENDATIOM• Approval of the Joint Use Agreement with Southern California Edison Comparq for relocation and installation of electrical transmission lines 1n connection with the traffic signal project at the intersection of Footh111 Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. 8AC1f9ld/ID/AMIILPSIS The design of the Traffic Signal and Street 111dening protect for the lntersectlan of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Includes relocation of several utilities. The Southern California Edison Compagy acquired an Electrical Transmission Easement, on private property, south of Foothill Boulevard in 1%I. This area has now been Included 1n the street widening south of Foothill Boulevard G5 aecomaodate reallgmaent of the intersection. Consequently, the Edison utiiify poles need to be relocated from the private utility easement area to a normal position behind the future curb. The Joint Use Agreement 15 used in cases such as this to preserve the Company's "prior rights after the poles are installed in a City street easement area. Therefore, Southern California Edison has prepared the document for City Council approval and execution. Respectfully submitt/gd~~Y < NJO:PAR:Iy U CJ~ Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9~' ~(p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A JOINT USE AGREEMENT .• NITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COr1PANY FOR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES AT ROCHESTER AYENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has acquired easement rights for street and related facilities at Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and IMEREAS, the City 1s widening the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; and, WHEREAS, the Southern California Edison Company awns a private utility easement and maintenance facilities within the area acquired by the City which need relocation due to the widening; and, VMEREAS, the Southern California Edison Company has prepared a Joint Use Agreement for relocation of the Utility Poles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Connell of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby approve said Joint Use Agreement providing for the relocation of Edison Utilities out o1w the proposed traffic areas to the proposed street parkway, preserving the prior rights of the Edison Company, and authorize the Mayor to sign said Agreement and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 3g June 19, 1991 CITY QF P,A1>,'CH(3 t'LTC~~IONIiA STAFF REPORT T0: Mayor and City Councitmembers .'e^!: '. ",l"", City ria na ger FROM: Jerry R. Grant, Building Offfcial SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MODEL HOME COMPLEX PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION RECORDATION - TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 14866 - 7HE PENNHI LL COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize execution of the attached Agreement. ANALYSIS The Subdivision Map Act provides for approval for construction of model homes prior to recordation of the final tract map. The accompanying agreement form has been developed through the City Attorney's office anA outlines the 9ua ran teas necessary to proceed with the model home complex and assure removal in the event that the final map is not recorded wf thin two years. SUMMARY Execution of the accompanying agreement will allow the Pen nh ill Company to proceed with construction of their model complex prior to recordation of the final map for Tentative Tract 14866. Respectfully submitted. y R. nC ~G~ it ding ficial JG:71 Attar hment 39 AGREEMERT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective June 20, 1991, by and between The Pennhill Lompany, (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"), a Cati forn is Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred ~' Lo as "City"), a Municipal Corporation. RECITALS A. Developer is the owner of record of certain real property, (the "Property") located in the City, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. ~. Le veiuper fires unaerta xen suodrv751on of portions of Lhe Property as Tentative Tract No. 14866 ("Tract"), as descrf bed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Developer has obtained aDDrvval of the Tentative Tract Map by the City and proposes to develop this property in single family residential use. C. Developer desires to tonstruct the model homes for the Tract, and associated improvements, prior to recordation of the final subdivision map for the Tract. 0. The City wishes to permit such construction, provided that the public health, safety and welfare are not adversely affected, and provided that the City has adequate security that the ultimate subdivision and development of the Tract will be completed, or that otherwise the property will be restored to its original condition. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that Oe veloper may construct the model homes for the Tract, and associated improvements, prior to recordation of the final subdivision maps for the Tract, provided the following conditions are met: 1. q maximum of four (4) model homes in Tentative Tract 14866 may be constructed prior to final subdivision map recordation pursuant to this Agreement. 2. All construction and improvements shall be reasonably consistent with the Tentative Tract Map as approved by the City Planning Commission on July 11, 1990. 3. Developer has provided to the City Planning Division detailed site plans indicating the homes and improvements to be constructed, including streets, off-street parking areas, fencing, landsca pl ng and signs. Such plans are subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 4, Developer shall provide tv Lhe Cf ty Engineering Oivis ion detailed improvement plans and cost estimates for the public improvements to be constructed. Such plans and estimates are subject to review and approvai by the City Engineer. ~D 5. Developer shall submit application for a Temporary Use Permit for the model home sales office Lo the City Planner. ~ 6. The City shall issue a Temporary Use Permit for the model home sales office, pursuant to this Agreement, subject to the following conditions: (a) The sales office may be located in a garage, trailer or dwelling. (b) The sales office is to be used only for transactions involving the ~.te e~• n. te.co ni tore anA/nr ctrnrtnras within the tract in which the sales office is located, or con tf guous tracts. (c) Temporary off-street Darki ng at a rate of two (2)) spaces per model shall be completed to the satisfactior. of the City Engineer and City Planner prior to commencement of sales activities or the display of model homes. (d) All fences proposed in conjunction with the model homes and sales office shall be located outside of the public right-of-way. (e) Flags, pennants, or other on-site advertising shall be regulated pursuant to the Sign Regulations of the Municipal Code. (f) Use of signs shall require submission of a Sign Permit application for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. 7, Developer shall provide to the City Building and Safety Division architectural plans for the model homes. Such plans are subject to review and approval Gy the Building Official. 8. The improvements to be included in the model home construction shall include construction of streets, and associated landscaping, to provide adequate access Lo the model homes until the remainder of the street improvements for the Tract are completed. 9. All improvements related to the model complex for streets, grading, utilities, and drainage shall 6e constructed to ultimate standards as indicated on the pro Dosed final subdivision maps and Lhe proposed final engineering plans for the tract prior Lo use of any model home. 10. Developer shall post bond for completion of all improvements prior to use of any model home. 11. The City shall issue building permits and other necessary permits for construction of the homes and fmprovements, and shall issue notices of completion for the homes when appropriate. However, developer warrants and agrees that there shall be no occupancy of any model home for residential purposes until the final subdivision map for the Tract in which it is located has been recorded. 41 12. Developer warrants and agrees that if the final subdivision map for the Tract is not recorded within two (2) years after building permits for the first model home to De constructed are obtained, the model homes in said '' tract will immediately be demolished or removed, and the property restored to its original condition at developer's sole cost. Developer shall provide security for removal and/ar demolition in the sum of the estimated cost of the demal ition plus bID,000.00 per house. 13. Developer shall Provide adequate emergency access and adequate fi re fl ow, to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, prior to delivery of combustible materiai> w >I te. 14. Temporary model area fences will be as indicated on the detailed site Glans, All other walls and fences will be installed to permanent standards. 15. Developer shall perform and bond, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, for maintenance of all public areas including landscaping in the model home project until all improvements in the Tract are atce pted by the City. 16. This agreement shall be recorded 6y the Developer in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino following City Approval of Agreement, 17. Promptly after recordation of the final map or restoration of the property under Paragraph 12 of this Agreement, the City shall furnish Developer with a Certificate(s) of Compliance in a form suitable for recording upon request by Developer. Such Certificate of Compliance shall be, and shall so state, conclusive determination of satisfaction of covenants and conditions regal red by this Agreement, and full compliance with the terms hereof. Rfter issuance of such Certificate of Compliance, any party than owning or thereafter purchasing, leasing or otherwise acquiring any intre st in the at part of the Pro Derty for which a Certificate of Compliance has been issued shall not incur any further obligation or liability under this Agreement, and Shall be thereafter released from any covenants, conditions, or restrictions herein contained. 18. Should any party bring suit to enforce any provision of this Agreement or claim arising therefrom, the successful Darty in such proceeding shall he entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and any judgement awarded shall include same. 19. This Agreement shall 61nd and inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. ya IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed thla Agrnement effeetfva on the day and yenr first above written. ., ~,. "City" CITY OF RANCkO CUCAMONGA, A Municipal Corporation ATTEST: BY: ayer C1tY er "OeveTaper" The Pennhtll Company ' r, ay.~ Da a Ho mes ~~ CITY OF RAivCHG CIiCAMUIvGA .•~... STAFF REPORT ~. DATE: Sure 19, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lan, AICP, City Mane gar FADM: Brad Huller, City PlanneY HY: Anthea Hartig. Aaevclnie PLarmer SUBJHCT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND ADTHORIZ6 EggCUTIQ7 OP A CONTAACf FOR TFIB AANCRO COCAMONGA ORAL gISTORY PROGRAN~ PHASE I TO MgLLON AND ASSOCL4T88, FOR TBE ANODNT OP $72 055 TO BB PUNDEO HY TRB RANCRO COCAMGNGA COlMDNITY POIR7DATION P6001m®DATIOM Staff recommends that the Council approve the contract ararding the Rancho Cucamonga Oral History Program, Phase I, for 512,055, to Mellon and Associates of Riverside, California. We are row ready to begin the Oral Aiatory Program, m established community goal and wazk program Stem for tha Planning Division's 1990- 1997 fiscal year. After releasing a Raqueei for Proposals and receiving tvo proposals earlier this yenr, the Planning Division recommends the firm of Mellon and Associates to the Council. Dr. Mellon has had a long and diatin9uiahed career in academic and public history, historic preservation, and oral history. AtALYSIB The contract proposal results in the processing of 12 oral histories. The coat breakdo,m Se detailed in the Scope of Services contained within the contract but in general it includes a pre-interview rnnsultant research time of 75 hours per intezvier~ an average interview time of 3 hours per subject, and duplicate cataloged cassette tapes, for inclusion in the City archives. Slgnificnntly, the product also includes bound and edited tranecriptiona of each intervier. Dltimately these tape copies and transcripts will be ava! lnble for use in the City History Center at the Central. Park Library. ^_ITY C^LA.'CIL S!'APP P<aJRT ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM CONTIUCl June 19, 1991 Page 2 CO~CLBBI4 Staff therefore believer that in aracding this contract, the CSty'a oral History Program rill commence and produce excellent reeulL. Rea f ly eu /tted. Br\~_ /[1/e~/ City Planner BB:AH: ep r ~~ L.tTY' OF RAWLAL C!.'(;AAiOh`GA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 TDB Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community 6ervicas Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst IS Py SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF LIBRARY ENHANCEMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Library Enhancement Services Contract between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This contract provides $25,000 to the County for additional library services at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. This activity ie to be funded from account number 01-4532- 6028. HACAGROUND As City Council ie aware, during the past two years the City has contracted with the County of San Bernardino to provide $25,000 for additional library services at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. These funds have been used for additional operating hours on Sundays and for purchase of additional library materials for the Rancho Cucamonga Hranch Library. The attached proposed contract for the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library is far fiscal year 1990-1991. The proposed contract contains no modifications except for date changes to the previous contract agreed to by the City. This contract will continue to formalize the relationship between the City and the County thus providing Rancho Cucamonga residents with expanded hours of operation and enhancement of the book collection here in our City. Res ectP lly submitted, J Sc ultz CL Communit ervices Director JS:PP;tp Attachments 71GREIDlEtTp PERTAINING TO THE SNBANCID~N'f OP COONTY OP BAN HERNARD]7i0 LIBRARY 88RVICEB WITHIN THS CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIND ("County" hereinafter) and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("city" hereinafter). W ITN 8 3 8 E T H A. Recitals. (i) County now owns and operates a branch library on a Bite adjacent to Lions Park community Center, 9191 Base Line Road, within the City oP Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "Rancho Cucamonga Branch"). (11) Zt is the mutual desire of the parties hereto to enhance the resources and services available to the public at the Rancho Cucamonga Hranch on the terms specified herein. B. Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree ae follows: 1. In consideration of the enhancement of services and resources which County agrees to deliver at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch specified in paragraph 2 hereof, City agrees to reimburse County for County'e costa of electrical, gee, water and telephone ("utility costs" hereinafter) incurred at the Ranoho Cucamonga Branch during fiscal year 1990/1991 (July 1, 1990 through and including June 30, 1991) to a maximum of $25,000. In that regard, County shall supply to City an accounting of all such utility costa incurred by County at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch as soon as ie practicable following June 30, 1991. City 1~ shall provide the above-referenced reimbursement thereof, up to a maximum oP $25,000, within thirty (30) days of city's receipt of said accounting. 2. In consideration oP City's reimbursement obliga- tions set forth in paragraph 1 hereinabove, County shall: a. Maintain the Rancho Cucamonga Branch open through June 3n; iooi na.1...~ ,n w..._.... ~.. .-- iL :crWa lp ai.a:: and add four hours on each Sunday during which the Rancho Cuca- monga Branch will be open to the public commencing lmmedietely and continuing on each Sunday thereafter through and including Sunday, June 24, 1991. b. Augment the Rancho Cucamonga Branch's perma- nent reference section in an amount of $15,000 prior to June 30, 1991 and maintain said augmentation permanently at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch. c. Increase the 1990/1991 Funding for the Rancho Cucamonga Branch's rew books and materials by an amount of $20,000 immediately. 4. The materials referred to in subparagraph 2.b above shall be chosen and determined through a cooperative effort of County through its librarian located at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch and a designee of City's City Manager. 5. County shall and hereby does agree to indemnify City and City's elected officials, officers, employees and agents and agrees to save and hold each oP them harmless from any and all claims, actions, causes of action and damages, including court costs and attorney's fees related thereto, in any way 4~ nrisinq out of or connected with the operation and maintenance of the Rancho Cucamonga Branch to the maximum permitted by law. WHEREPORH, the parties hereto have entera8 into this Agreement as of the dates sat Eorth below opposite the name o! each party CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Aut oL 2ed 8 fjnature Au or tad a tJRatUre Date 4q CITY GF R!LNCHQ CUCA.4f0*7GA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 TO: Mayor, Members of the Clty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager ,y BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst IIQ SUBJECT: Approval of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) Memorandum of Dnderstanding RECOMMFNI)ATrnx staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Alta Loma, Central, Etiwanda school Districts, the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the continuation of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. The MOU provides $44,552 from the City to the DARE program. This activity is to be funded from account number 01-4651-6028. BACKGROUND As City Council is aware, the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program was implemented by City Council as a pilot program last year. The program is jointly funded by Alta Loma, Central and Etiwanda School Districts and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The attached MOU for the DARE program is for the time period of July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992. The MOU contains minor modifications reflecting additional one-time funds that the schccl districts have received and have earmarked for the DARE program as well as date changes to the previous MOU as agreed to by the City. The City's financial obligation to the program remains the same as last year. In order to continue the DARE program it ie staff's recommendation that the attached Memorandum of Understanding between Alta Loma, Central, Etiwanda School Districts, the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga be approved. Re ectfull ubmitt d, rry Fulwood Deputy City Manager JF:PP:PP Attachment MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into by the Alta Loma, Central ~` and Etiwanda School Districts, We County of San Bernardino, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of jointly sponsoring and continuing the Dmg Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. In order to accomplish this goal the agencies listed below will contribute the following dollar amounts to be used for the continuation of the DARE program: Alta Loma School District -- 532,317 (530,317 -CADPE Allotment plus 52,000 - one-time special fund contribution); Central School District -- 519,377 (517,377 r_n_n_nr_ •u_.___. _ .., y1::a f.2 °°~ - .-i:we ~y.:..:a: iuuu wuuiumiuuj; nliwanoa School Distric[W-- 58,849 (56,849 V CADPE Allotment plus 52,000 - one-time special fund contribution); We City of Rancho Cucamonga •- 544,552. The County of San Beroardina will provide one DARE o(fieer in accordnnce with the terms and provisions of the contract for police service between said county and Ne City of Rancho Cucamonga to be shnrcd between the three school districts on a proportional basis based upon the dollar amount contributed by each district to the program (Alta Loma School District -- 56% of the officer's time; Central School District -- 32% of the officer's time, and Etiwanda School District -- l2% of the officer's time). This agreement shall be effective from July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992. If modifications are necessary before or at that time, they will be added to Wis Memorandum of Understanding by mutual agreement of all the partits involved. We hereby agree to this Memorandum of Understanding and certify that the agreements made here will he honored. Signature: Alta Loma School District, Superintendent Signature: Centml School District, Superintendent Signature: Etiwanda School District, Superintendent Signature: Signature: County of San Bemardino Rancho Cucamonga, Mayor SI - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT ~~'° ,~ ~.~ K rra ~ p DATE: June 19, 1991 F a z U' T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council i9n Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks 2nspector lI SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREElENT E%TENSigI FOR TNACT 13279 ..,~~~~~ L,v,.`n nu rur emn•u erne rc NinNl awn aViMIK gRWicN ROCHESTER~AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY NECOMMENDIITIDN It is recommended that the City Councll adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13279 Landscape were approved by the City Councll on November 5, 1987, to the following amounts: faithful Performance Bond: S9,93B,266 Labor and Material Bond: f4,969,133 The developer, The Nilliam Lyon Company, Is requesting approval of a 6-mOMh extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the punch itst items, and the landscape, and also to make the necessary arrangements to have two maJor construction items deleted from the Conditions of Approvai and have those items conditioned to another tract. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submit _ l~U~~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil (/// City Engineer NJO:SMG:dIw Attachcents ~~ LYON :f/+eN.ILLIAM Ll'ON t~d,~x~7 d490 VON W+RMAN, P0.80% 7520, IJEWPORT BEACH. CA 726507520 . (714) 8933600 • 4AX (714) 476-8604 May 15, 1991 Nr. Steve Gilliland Public works Inspector l1Ly OL Oa11V1,V WVOM.uya 10500 Civic Cenur Drive Rancho Cucawonga, California 91729 Re, Projecu Sn Default Dear Suve, RECtIV~D MAY 171991 att cE RaNCNO cuaamcrsp ER,TNE£RINC 0!N&iu:4 Pursuant to our conversstion yesterday r'egar'din4 the projects In default, trane~itted herewith are the Lprovesient Agteesent Extensions and the reasons for needing these exumiom. Parcel Hap 10185 -The landacspinq and concrou work !or the north aide of Kenyon way Eros Faltt.aEt Hay to M1111ken Avenue still needs to be cospleted. However, thin work ie contingent upon the cospletion o! the block well for Tract 14121 (J. P. Moadea Development). we have been in contact with J.P. Rhoades Development ngardinq the wall but due to market conditiorm constructian of their single featly project has not comsenced. Tracts 13280 & 13281 Landscape - The insullstion of the Iandacapinq is contingent upon the completion of each tract by the aerchant builder rolstad to tM tie-lna u out infrastructure. Ne have been in contact with each developer, and due to market coMitiona construction o! Tract 13280 has not coweneed, while construction of Tract 13281 just stetted. Tract 13279 - Due to the wiMa and finet, repalt and replacement o! landscaping 1n various aectiom wet be completed prior W Hisses of bonds. In addition, two sections o! improvexnu still have to be coTyleted however, they have been requested to be released from Tract 13279 and placed ea a condition on Tract 14534, per letur ro you dated January 14, 1991 Ems Christine Meiaaenburq. Please respond to this tequeet. As per our discussion on Tract 13442 Kenyon Park, I will teaeerch this further for writun confltastion of the release of our bonds. Mditionally, I would Ilke to request that all extensions be lade effective fiw the dau of City Council approval due Co the tLe lapse Ems the expiration dau to current dau. Z offer ry apologise for this S3 REAL ES~AiE DEVELOPMENT' 1.,YQN ..6~eWILLIAM LV~ON~ r situation and appreciate all your help. Since the landecepinq associated with Psrwl Map 10185 and Tracts 13380 and 13291 are associated with setchant builder projects thst have rat started conatavctlon, i alw raqusat that the saxiavat titre extension be granted. I! you have any questions tngatdinq this setter, please don't hesitate to contact ai! at (7U) 876-5220. Thank you for your rise and cooperation. xeepsetrully, ~~ Lori Brown Purchesinq Inland 9apim Division encl. S~{ REAL ESTATE CEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION N0. GJ / ~ ~ ~P ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING IMPROVEMENi AGREEMENT '" E%TENSION AND IIPROVEIENT SECURItt FOR TRACT 13279 LANDSCAPE NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 3, 1991, 4y The Ntlliam Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of pubife right-of-wdy adJacent to the rest property specifically described therein. and o.n.ratty 1^cet^."_ -- t`,a ;4ut6 ride of mgmand Avenue oetween M1111ken Avenue and Rochester Avenw; and NHEREAS, the lnstallatton of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and suWect to the teras thereof, 1s to ba done 1n conJunctton with the development of said Tract 13279; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified to said Improvement Agreement Extension. Nqi, THEREFORE, the C11;y Council oP the C1Xy of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that Bald Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor 15 hereby authorized t0 sign sold Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. SS -~- - CITY QF RA.*1CS0 CTJCA.IICNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lace, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I -~- SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13280 wiuauire, ~w:Aitu uN THE NORTH SIDE aF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN MI LLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE ,SUBMITTED BY THE NILLIAM LYON COMPANY RECONENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security Lo guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13280 Landscape were approved by the City Council on February 16, 1989, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f505,200 Labor and Material Bond: f252,000 The developer, The William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement 1n order to complete all landscaping which 1s contingent upon the completion of adjacent tracts being built by different developers. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk s Office. Respectfully subait d, q~ ~ ~ ~ p U / (iC~( Nm. Joe O'Neil C1 ty Engineer NJO:SMG:dIw Attachments Ll'4N :%~il1'1LLIAM L1vIV~F~iir~nn~ 4490 VON HARAAAN, PO aOx 7520, NF.VJPORI BEACH, C4 9?658 75<0 (J1q) gig 3h(~0 • IAx (714) q )6 Ah04 Nay 15, 1991 Nr, Steve Gilliland Public Worha Inspector City of aanrM rv,,.n.~....,.. 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Rel Projects in Default Dear Steve, rar_cc~ivr:~u h111Y 17 1991 cirv ar rr„Irno cu~n;nnsn r'~1!!r4ERlriq OIViGUy Pursuant to our converaetion yesterday regarding the projects in default, transmitted herewith ace the Improvement Agreement Extensions and the reasons for needing these extenalona. Parcel Nap 10185 - The landscaping and concrete work for the north side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way [o Milliken Avenue still needs to be completed. However, this work Ss contingent upon the completion of the block wall for Tract 14121 (J.P. Rhoades Development). Ne have beer, in contact xith J, P. Rhoades Development regarding the wall but due to market conditions construction of their single family project has not commenced. Tracts 13280 & 13281 Landscape - The installation of the landscaping Se contingent upon the completion of each tract by the merchant builder related to the tie-ins to our infrastructure. We have been in contact with each developer, and due to market conditions conatrvetlon of Tract 13280 has not commenced, while construction of Tract 13281 just started. Tract 13279 - pus to the winds and frost, repair and replacement of landscaping Sn various sections must be completed prior to release of bonds. In addition, two sections of improvements still have to be completed however, they have been requested to be released from Tract 13279 and placed am a condition on Tract 14534, per letter to you dated January 14, 1991 from Christine Neissenburg. Please respond to Chia request. As per our discussion on Tract 13442 Kenyon Park, I x111 research this further for written confirmation of the release of our bonds. Additionally, I would like to request that all extenalona be made effective from the date of City Council approval due to the time lapse from the expiration date to current~ldate. I offer ny apologies for this S l REAL ES 7A iE DEVELO PntE NI LYON ~i~wlLl.lAM Ll'UN~~m~asr~ situation and appreciate all your help, Since the landscaping associated with Parcel lisp 10185 and Tracts 13280 and 13281 are associated with merchant bulkier projects that have not started construction, I also request that the maximum time extension be granted. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please don't hesitate to contact K ai (716) a76-5220. Iiw~n Yuu Lur your ci~e and cuoperecion. Respectfully, _/ ~'~ ~~/1 ~~/(i- Lori Brown Purchasing Inland E~plre DSvlelon encl. s U ~. RI E;iTATE VELOI`b1E Plf RESaur1DN No. CI~- / ~ fQ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R11NCN0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ~, EXTENSION ANA INPROVEMENi SECURITY FOR TRACT 13280 LANDSCAPE NHEREA$, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucastongga, California, has for Its consideration an isprovateent Agreetaent Extanston executed on June 19, 1991, by The N1111a~ Lyon Cotapany as developer, for the lttprovexnt of public right-ofwaty adiacent to the real property speclficnlly •_.~_i.~...w. w~~~.~- wwA ....~r.llo l..^.fM ~., flu ,rrfA e b n1 RaM t11w Rn~A between Mi111ken Avenue and Rochester Avenue: and NHEREAS, the lnstallntion of such ltaprove^ents, described in sold letprovcwent Agreanent snd sub~act to the teens thereof, is to be done in conlunctlon lAth the development of said Tract 13280; and NNEREAS, said Iprova~ent Agreeetetet Extension 1s secured end accaepanled by good and sufficient leproveleent Security, which is identified 1n said IRproveetent Agreaeent Extanston. NON, THEREFORE, the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucaronga, Lallforola hereby resolves, that said Itaproveteant Agreee+ent Extension and said Etsprovetaent Security be and the setae are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Itaprovetaent Agreaeent Extension on behalf of the C1ty of Rancho Cucaoonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 59 CITY OF RANCHC C11L'd1rT?isjrA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~p c~a+o~~, ~,(` '7 z C ^ i~ J ~ ~ D 1977 FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II ~~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FnR marr +aon+ L%11~YJIi%1YC LUW1ItU UN NORTNNESI CORNER BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED eY THE NiLLIAM LYON COMPANY. It is recommw:nded that the City Lounctl adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreembnt. BAgcGR0U1N1/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13281 landscape, were approved by the City Council on February 16, 1989, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f401,300 Labor and Material Bond: f200,550 The developer, The N1111am Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement, in order t0 compiete all landscaping which 1s contingent upon the completion of adJacent tracts being built by different developers. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subml d, ~ ~ ~ G ~L~ Hm. Jce O'Neil City Engineer NJO:,~k Attachments LYON ,`%if wl~.~~wni l,tc)nl ~Frouffa~r~. 449U VON NARMAN,PO BO%9520. NEWPORT BFACH CA9?65B 75?U (714)833 ?aW • (A%(71A)47o~86UA Nay 15, 1991 Nr. Steve Gilliland Public Horks Inspector City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cueawnga, Callfprnfa 91729 Rel Projects In Default Dear Steve, L111Y i ~ i991 r(~~,nIEEAIq ~ IPVISION Pursuant to our conversation yesterday regarding the projects Sn default, transmitted herewith aze the Improvement Agreement Extensions and the reasons for needln9 these extensions. Parcel Map 10185 - The landscaping and concrete work for the north side of Kenyon Hay from Fairmont Hay to MSL11ken Avenue still needs to be completed. However, this work is contingent upon the completion of Che block wall for Tract 14121 (J.P. Rhoades Development!. He have been Sn contact with J.P. Rhoades Development regarding the wall but due to market conditions construction of their single family project has not commenced. Tracts 13280 6 13281 landscape - The installation of the landscaping 1s contingent upon the completion of each tract by the merchant builder related to the tie-ins to our infrastructure. He have been Sn contact with each developer, and due to market conditions construction of Tract 13280 has not commenced, while construction of Tract 13281 just started. Tract 13279 - Due to the winds and frost, repair and replacement of landscaping in various sections must be completed prior to release of bonds. In addition, two sections of Smprovements still have to be completed hoxever, Uey have been requested to be released from Tract 13279 and placed as a condition on Tract 14534, per letter to you dated January 19, 1991 from Christine Heissenburg. Please respond to this request. As per our discussion on Tract 13442 Kenyon Park, I will research this further for written confirmation of the release of our bonds. Additionally, Z would like to request that all extensions be made effective from the date of Clty Council approval due to the time lapse fram the expiration date to current date. I offer my apologies for this (PI RE AE ESIA IE D(':'(IOPIIF NI LYON ~~wILLIAM L1~UN C~a asr situation and appreciate all your help. Since the landscaping associated with Parcel Hep 10185 and Tracts 13280 and 13281 are associated Rlth merchant bulldsr pro)ects that have not started construction, Y also request that the maximum time extension be granted. If you have any questions regarding Uis matter, please don't hesitate to contact me at (716) 676-5220. •••^••~ r~~ ~~+ r~c+ ~+me anu caoperaclon. Respectfully, I°'7F~~~~r~(,. Lori Brotm Purchasing Inland Empire Division encl. (q, 2 REAL ESTAiE DEVELUf'IdE nT RESOLUTION N0. q'- ~(Q7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ,~ EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR Tract 13281 Landscape WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension PYPf II}P(i on June 19, 1991 by The William Lyon Company as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way a4lacenc m cne rani y,~p~~ v ;~;.c1f',c~'.'.; described therein, and generally located North West corner Dose Lure Road and Rochester Avenue. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, is to be done to con~unctlon with the development of said Tract 13281 Landscape; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension, NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. (0 3 ~~I'I'Y' LF R9.'~CAV !;ll(;dk1(1A'Ga STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: FROM: BY: SUI41Ff.T: ,p G M~~L^ 'C 7 ~'' ~ r < > z LL T, I_'~ ul ,a Mayor, and Members of the City Council Iv;% Jack Lam, AICP, Ctty Manager Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II~~ ARRR/IV11 nR twoonvrurur are~Eur.n ~~'r~~Iw~ ~~• ~~T 13359, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET BETWEEN ORCHARD STREET AND JENNET STREET, SUBMITTED BY H.K. HEIM, INC. It 15 recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUINI/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the canstruction of the public improvements for tract 13359 were aDDroved by the City Council on June 8, 1989, and extended for 12 months on July 18, 1990, in the foilowing amounts: Fatihful Performance Bond: (166,200 Labor and Material Bond: f 83,100 The developer, H.K. Heim, Inc., is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on Bald improvement agreement due to the econaatc slowdown and difficulty in construction financing. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available to Lhe City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su d, Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments ROYAL CONbERV CCRPORAfION r _ Hsi zG. 1,41 CIiY OF P.ANCHO CIICAMUNGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCRMONGR, CA 91723 RTTENTION: STEVE M. GILLI LAND - PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR SU6J ECT : EXPIRATION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 13354 DERR SIR: PER OUR PHONE CONVERSATION ON THURSDAY MRV 16, 1991, AND YOUR LETTER DATED MAY 13, 1991, I WISH TO SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING REQUEST. DUE i0 A SUBSTANTIAL SLOW DOWN IN THE DEMAND FGR HOUSING, COUPLED WITH THE NEW BANNING LOAN REQUIREMENTS, WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PROCEED WITH THIS PROJECT AS QUICKLY AS WE WOU LO HAVE LIKED TO. IN RDOITION TO THE TURN IN MARN ET TRENDS, H.K. HELM, iNC. RECENTLY HIRED ROYAL CONSE RV CORPORATION TO GENERAL CONTRACT THE 708. WE Al ROYRL CONSERV WILL BE REPRESENTING THE OWNER RND PROCEEDING SNORT LY. IT IS OUR FEELING THAT WE WILL BE IN FOSiTiON TO aT ART THE FkuTECi WiiHiN A MONTH OR TWO AND d'c SUBS TANTIALLV COMPLETE IN FOUR MONTHS FROM THAT ORTE. H. K. HEIM INC. RND ROYRL CONSERV, CORP. WOULD GRE RT LY APPRECIRTE R SI% MONTH E%TENSION OF THE "IMPROVEMENT RGREEMENT". RESPECTFULLY, CHARLES R GENERAL MANRGER lD 300 5~,ulh Grand Ave. Suite 1210. I.~; Angeles. C~ 900',t "I'el: (213) 439-1499 t'ax: (213) 489-1843 RESOLUTION N0. Q/' /~B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING YMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT "' EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13359 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 19, 1991, by J.K. Heim, Inc. as developer, for the improvement of publ7c right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically AncrrihnA fFa.vln anA nen.r+,11v 1nra~aA nn 1M .aef e~Aa of 4nnA~ru l~..a~ between Orchard Street and Jennet Streei; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described In said Improvement Agreement aM subJect to the teen thereof, 15 to De done to conJunctlon with the development of said tract 13359; and WHEREAS, said Improveamrtt Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improveeent Agreement Extension and said improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. - L.1TF nF RAIvCH~I Ci~CA310?vGA ~i;c+;J- STAFF REPORT ~~ ~+.~ o ~ DATE: June 19, 1991 ~ ~ '0 f U > T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council ivn Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, Ctty Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II~~ SUBJECT: APDROVAI (IG TIpROVFMFNT AnRFFKRT CYTFRCinN F(IR Ta arT t iSf.S STREETS AND TRACT 13565 LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND NARDMRN BULLOCK ROAD, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC OF ORANGE COUNTY RECONENDATION !t is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKOAOUMD/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements were approved by the County of San Bernardino on January 9, 1989, and transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 1, 1989, in the following amounts: Streets Landscape Faithful Performance Bond: f1,764,000. 5619,000. Labor and Material Bond: S 882,000. 5309,500. The developer, Standard Patlfie of Orange County, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on Bald improvement agreement in order to complete all required Improvements due to the extreme large size of the project. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su tedC^~(~ „ Nm. Joe O'Neil ~/ City Engineer NJO:SMG:1y Attachments 5'fANDARD PACIFIC OF ORr1ItiGE C4U~TY May 31, 1991 Mr. Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector City of Rancho CLramonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Extension of Improvement Agreement for 1Ysct 13565/5-10 landscape Dear Steve: This letter is to request a 12-month extension to Improvement Agreement 13565/5-10 Landscape, which expired on 1/9/91. Standard Pacific has not completed the required improvements per the Conditions of Approval due to the recent economic conditions. However, we anticipate some constmction activity to take place in the near future. The improvements covered under the above-mentioned agreement that have aot been construMed, wilt not have any impact on the City or to the existing homeowners of our tract. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me Cordially, `~ 1, / Mic el Whit MW/cw Enclosure cc: 13ob Shiota Ray Allard, FWI.S ~~ 1565 Wert MacArthur Boulevard Coate Mesa, California 92626, 91A1668-4J00 SG\NDARD PACIFIC OF ORANCECOUNTY May 31, 1991 Mc Steve Gilliland Public Works InspeMOr (`inr of Raarthn (}rcamon¢a P.O. Box g07 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Extension of Improvement Agreement [or TraM 13565/5.10 Streets Deaz Steve: This letter is to request a 12-month extension to Lnprovement Agreement 13565/5-10 Streets, which expired on 1/9/91. Standard YaciGc has not completed the required improvements per the Conditions of Approval due to the recent economic conditions. However, we anticipate some construction aotivity to take place in the near future. The improvemenu covered under the above•mentioned agreement that have not been constructed, will not have any impact on the City or to the existing homeowners at our Vact. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me. CordiagG^~~l/r./i ~T'i"ti Michael White MW/cw Enclosure cc: Bob Shiota Ray Allard, F WLS ~~ 1565 Wnt Madrthur Boulevard Costa Meta, California 92626, 774i66B,4300 RESOLUTION N0. ~~ - ~ ~p y A RESOLUTION OF THE C1T APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, STREETS ANDANTRACT~3565~ANDSCAPE RITY FOR TRACT 1356 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for it 1991nsideraN on an Improvement Agreemens ed fically by Standard pacific as developer. for the executed on June 19, a. e~en:«~h.ast corner ofpSummit Avenue and s nnhllc right-of-wa.Y 41 lmpru•c~~,:. -~ and genera iy iw,og;,,, .._. described therein. Wardman Bullock Road; and described in said WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, is ~ be done 1n Improvement Agreement and subject W the terms thereo . nt of said Tract 13565 Streets and Tract 13565 conSunction with the developme Landscape; and WHEREAS. said improvement Agreement Extenslo~lch is~deMified accompanied by 90~ and sufficient Improvement Security. /n said Improvement Agre~nt Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the C1tY Louncll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California hereby resolves, that said Improvement A9ree~nt Extension and said Improvement Security be and Che same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign smld ImProvemenClerk to attestethereton behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA STAFF REPORT j- DATE: June 19, 1991 n ' V T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Las, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector t[c~t~ SUBJECT: APPROYAL OF LI~ROYEMENT AOREEIENT E%TENSION FOR OR 87-48, lVt,nT~u ~,; ~~ cnnu cini OF 9TH STREET BETNEEN NELLMAN AVENUE ANO ARCHIBALD FYENUE, SUBMITTED BY Stall)itiliiu F:LF: , RECONEIDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreesent extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and C1ty Clerk to sign sold agreement. BACK6ROUID/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and lmprovlment Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements far DR 87-48 were approved by the City Council on Novesber 16, 1989, 1n the following asounts: Faithful Perforwance Bond: 56,100 Labor and Material Bond: 13,050 The developer, Sebastlano Filpi, 1s requesting approval of a 4-month extension on said Improvement agreement 1n order t0 complete the street paving. The developer wishes to have Daving tak< ; ace at the same time as the on-site parking lot which is contingent upon Planning Division's approval. Copies of the Improvdeent Agresaent Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submi ed, ~,crfi i ~ /~~~..~~-~ Ns. Joe O'Ne11 i City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachaents Cucamonga Industrial Center 987-4343 ., June 2, 1991 Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector near aceve~ The delay for city final on parking lot on Ninth St. is due to the fact that we had to wait for Planning Commission approval. We will pave the street at [he same time as the parking lo[. n ince 1 Buster Filpi ~- RESOLUTION N0. 9~.j 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlpNGli, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT w EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMEiR SECURITY FOR DR 87-18 NNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Raroho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Iwtprovamont Agreeieent Extension executed on June 19, 1991, by Sebastiano F11p1 as developer, for the taproveaent of public right-of-wAy adjacent to the reel property specifically described thereto, and generally located on south Side of 9th Street between uai..., a~...,,...,n a..MAdA b~nu~• ...w NNEREAS, the lnatallatton of such legrovemonts, described in said Iieproveaknt Agreesent and sub~act to the terws thereof, 1s to be done in conJunction with the developarnt of sold DR 87-48; and NNEREAS, said Ia~prove~ent Agreeaxnt Extension 1s secured and aceonpanied by good and wfflclent Iaproveeient Security, which 15 identified in said Iaprovesent Agrearent Extension. NON, TFR:REFORE, the City Connell of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said IprovenenL Agreement Extension and said InproveaKnt Security be and the see are hereby approved arM the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign Bald Iaproveaxnt AgreeaKnt Extension on behal f of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S~'~AFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 F~j T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council U ~sn Jack Lae, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, PuD11c Norks Inspector II~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL W1P im oc LnM~+.~ ~u .~~` ~iiiwcoi oonncn ~ nl u•1U1f1U I~tGNUG AND MILLI KEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE NILLIAN LYON COMPANY It is recaammnded that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreeeent extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACI(GROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreeeent and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 10185 were approved by the City Council on April 16, 1987, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5606,000 Labor and Material Bond: f303,000 The developer, The Hilliam Lyon Company, is requesting aDProval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement, 1n order to complete the improvements which are contingent upon the construction of another tract which has not yet started due to economic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully suMNitte< Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer MJO:SMG:dIw Attachments LYOi J :~/~eN'II.LIAM I,S();~i~l~m~avr~ x490 VON %ARMAN PO BOX 7520,NFNPORIBEACH CA S2C59~%5;0 1714)9:!3 J6W fA%(7U])476-PM14 Nay 15, 1991 Mr. Steve Gilliland Pu611c Works Inspector crcY of nwrciw ~uumwuya losoo Clvlc Center Orive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Rer Projects in Default Dear Steve, i.l1~'I ~ ! js)9j CIIY fl I'r!(CIIU PL'r ~~~l,.;,,~ 1r'. u:ERltl9 0!41i1U'1 Pursuant Lo our conversation yesterday regarding the pro jecta in default, transmitted herewith aze the Improvement Agreement Extensions and the reasons for needing these extensions. Parcel Map 10185 - The landscaping and concrete work for the north side of Kenyon Hay from Fairmont Way to llilliken Avenue still needs to be completed. However, this work Ss contingent upon the completion of the block wall for Tract 14121 (J.P. Rhoades Development). We have been in contact with J.P. Rhoades Development regarding the wall but due to market conditions construction of their single family project has not commenced. Tracts 13280 & 13281 Landscape - The installation of the landscaping is contingent upon the completion of each tract by the merchant builder related to the tie-ins to our infrastructure. He have been in contact xith each developer, and due to market conditions construction of Tract 13280 has not commenced, while construction of Tract 13281 just started, Tract 13279 - Due to the winds and frost, repair and replacement of landscaping in various sections must be completed prior to release of bonds. In addition, two sections of improvements still have to be completed however, they have been requested to be released from Tract 13279 and placed as a condition on Tzacc 14534, per letter to you dated January 14, 1991 from Christine MelsseMurg. Please respond to this request. As per our discussion on Tract 13442 Kenyon Park, I will research this further for written confirnatlon of the release of our bonds. Additionally, I would like to request that all extensions be made effective from the date of City Council approval due to the time lapse from the expiration date to current date. I offer my apologies for thSs ~s REA1 ESIA If I'f vl' ~~p :~I III LYON .~wiLL~AM LtiVN't~'~,r~fnn~ situation and appreciate all your help. S1nce the landscaping associated with Pescel Hep 10185 and Ttacta 13280 and 13281 ere associated xith cerchant builder proiecta that have not started construction, I also seguest that the aaxlmum tice extension be granted. If you have any questions regarding this latter, please don't hesitate to contact ak at (716) 676-5220. ......... i.... ... a..... ..... . ............r............ Respectfully, _~ ~'y9 ( ~~1~ /~PI(.~ Lori Brovn Purchasing Inland Elepln Division encl. 1~ RI ' E;ITA7E gE'JE! Oi'A4 X11 RESOLUTION N0. 9~ • I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlN)NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREElENT EXTENSION AMD IIpROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10185 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaron a, Callfornla, has for its consideration an Irproverent Agrearent Extension executed an June 19, 1991, by The Will tar Lyon Carparry as developer, for Lhe irproverent of public right-of-w;y adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Highland •..,..... ,wA Y~11 ~4~w au~nua• s„A WHEREAS, the installation of such irproverents, described 1n said croo~unc~tton with then deveopren of said Parc 1 Nap 0 85t~ and ~ ~ done in WHEREAS, said Irproverent Agreerant Extension is secured and accarpanled by good and wfflclent Irprovesient Security, which is Tdentlfted to said Irproverent Agreerant Extension. Npl, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaronge, Callfornla hereby resolves, that said Irprovarent Agreerent Extension and said Iaryroverent Security be and the sane aro hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Irproverent Agrearent Extension on behalf of Lhe City of Rancho Cucaronga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. - CITY QF R.9.*ICAQ CUCA.hfQ:dGA ~^±o STAFF REPORT v ~~. r DATE: June 19, 1991 ~ ~A T0: Mayor and Mealbers of the City Council U ~-~ t Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector Ih~T SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF i.urrLtllun ruH IfR ~IIAfM UlA1N AND ROUGH GRADING OF MILLIKEN PARK, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NILLIKEN AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND MOUNTAIN MIEN DRIVE RECOMENDATION: The required improvements for the stores drain and rough grading of Milliken Park have been completed to an acceptable manner, and 1t 1s recommended that Ctty Council accept said Improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the CTty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Band 1n the amount of 5386,772.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Milliken Park - located on the east side of Milliken Avenue between Church Street and Mountain View Drive. DEYELOPER: Lewis Homes P.0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5386,772.00 Respectfully su db~`^''" Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:1y Attachment RESOLUTION N0. G1,- 17a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE STORM DRAIN AND ROUGH GAADTN6 OF MILLIKEN PAW( ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COAFLETION FOR THE NORK NHEWEAS, the construction of public iwproveeents for the store drain and rough grading of Mittiken Park have been caagleLed W the satisfaction of the v i yr '.ayt :.. _^.? WHEREAS, a Notice of Coapletlon is required tiD M filed, certifying the vrork caaplete. Npl, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuce~ongga hereby resolves, that the cork 1s hereby accepted snd the City EngiMer Is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Coagietion Mth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOR'~ ,.,. DATE: June 19, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, ALCP, City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, OLP, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: RELEASE OF THE IMPROVEMENT BONDS FOR THE RENYON PARK PROJECT CO That the City Council authorize the release oP the following bonds for the Kenyon Park Improvement Project: Faithful Performance $560,009.00 Material and Labor 280,000.00 BACRGROIIND/ANALYSIS The Kenyon Park Improvement Project was completed by the William Lyon Company and accepted by City Council on August 15, 1990. Improvement Bonds have been ha13 on this project for the past ten months and no claims have been made. Therefore, staff recommends release of all bonds at this time. Respectfully submitted, J Schultz, Co unity Se ea Director JS/IOC/dak DATE: i0: FROM: 8Y: SUBJECT: - CITY OF RANCHO ~U0.4MQNGA ~ ,- STAFF REPORT ~~ V .~ K r June 19, 1991 ~~~ v6~ ~ Mayor, and Members of the Ctty Council iw~ Jack Las, AICP, City Manager Ws. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ~ RELEASE OF 14AINTENANCE RDND FGR TRACT 12914, LOCATED ON THE :.'~:^.,'..'„',T ~vnrii:n uF wnCiiiniu.u 11YtNUt AND HIGHLAND AYENIAi ~ It is recomsended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one year saintenance ppeeriod has ended and the street improvee«•nts remain free fray defects in sateriels and workmanship. DEVELOPER: First Nationwide Network Mortgage 23277 Ventura Boulevard Noodland N111s, CA 91364 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 532,600 Respectfully submi ~/ Ma. Jce O'Neil City Engineer WJD:SMG:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REF'©R.T DATE: June 19, 1941 ~Ij `4n II ~LS> T0: Mgyar, and McMbers of the City Council ~y» Jack Lae, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wn. Joe O'Neil, Ctty Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Pub11c Warks Inspector SUBJECT: RELEASE OF M111NTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 12944, LOCATED ON TERaALt riiii Lvui nT n~. ",„`,.': !uTnu.n c7ocrT awn COPPER PASS COURT RECOMNENOATIOM It is recoasaended thet~the C1ty Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACI(6ROUID/ANALYSIS The required ane year uaintenance period has ended and the street improveaw:nts re:aain free fray defects in natertals and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 15treetl f13,5OO Respectfully subml Nm. Joe O'Neil l.J C1ey Engineer WJO:SMG:sd - CITY QF RANCHO CUC!!_MONG9 ~;;c~.:ro~ STAFF REPORT ~~ ~.~ o 8 DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SU&IECT: June 19, 1991 n m F!I V Z Up Mayor, and Nesters of the City Council rsn Jack Las, AICP, City Manager Na. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector. RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 13342, LOCATED ON THE tA~i aiuc ur ntanwA nrtnue oeiwten lyin ain¢iT iviG ririi.ri AVENUE It is recossended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to . release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. The required one year saintenance period has ended and the street isprovesents resaln free from defects 1n saterials and worksanshtp. DEVELOPER: Pannon Design 23277 Ventura Blvd. Noodland H111s, CA 91364 Release: Streets Private Streets Maintenance Guarantee Bond ;47,600 ;17,600 Respectfully subslt ~~ ~ Lk ~~ Nwt. Joe O'Neil ~~.// City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd ~~TTT OF S~yr_,Hn+^UCr1310yGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FROM: BY: SIIRJFCT: cA,G-.wc~ ~~ ~ ~'n o ~ June 19, 1991 F ~ Z u a Mayor, and Members of the City Council .o;; Jack Lam, AIC-, City Manager Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve N. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecto~ RELEASE OF M1IINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 13558. LOCATED ON SIERRA CREST VIEN LOOP AT MI. GUNNISON COURT AND MATE MOUNTAIN COURT REC4/EI~ATION It 1s recommended that the City Council authorize the Ctty Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. 8ACK6ROIIID/AI W.VSIs The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Or1ve Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street] ELa 500 Respectfully submitted, ~.C ~ ~ ~ VAn. Joe O'Neil City Engineer - NJO:SMG:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,..~ DATE: June 19, 1991 ~`P% ' r;? TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~~ FRDM: Brad Huller, City Planner BY: Otto Rxoutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL VEAICLB STOMGE - Review of current City regulations affecting storage and parking of Recreational . ".. ~.......: :: y •V al .fV PP. RR[b1~ID11ZI0~: The Council should review racomendntlona made by the Planning Commission and the Public Safety Co®iesion, take public testimony, and provide staff with appropriate policy direction. Available options include direction to, 1. Retain the current ordinance, ae recommended by the Public Safety Coomieaion; or 2. Retain the current ordinance, but relax the time limits frgm 24 hours to five days, ae taco®ended by the Planning Commisaiont or 3. Ease the reatrletiona on certain vehicles, utilizing criteria suggested by the two Com;iaeiona; or 4. Any other modifications deemed appropriate by the City Council. HACR!':NIQlD: Review of the City's RV regulations for residential propertied was initiated by the City Council 1n response to crommunity concerns. Tha Council requested that two City commieaiona, the Public Safety Cc~iss ion and the Planning Co®iesion, review the existing ordinance and make reco®endationa on the issue to the City Council. 11hat does the cmrrevt ordinance ma7T Existing regulations dealing with ALL vehicles (not just AV's) distinguish between "storage," which is conaidared permanent, and "parking," which ie of a temporary nature. The ordinance prohibits all "storage. in residential front yards) NO vehicles (or other items such ae equipment, materials, ate.) may be permanently stored in front yards Or corner side yards. Recreational vehicles are considered "stored^ after 24 hours of continuous parking. Parking for up to 24 hours is permitted in the front yard areas. CITY COUNCIL STAPF REPORT ... ..TCRACE = CITY O° RA::CRO COCA.'r`a6A June 19, 1991 Pa qe 2 The current ordinance does allow storage of RV's (and other vehicles) on single family lots, in rear yards and interior aide yards only. ~ Although screening is required, fences need not exceed five (6) feet in height. Ohek is at iesue7 At issue is whether or net permanent storage of RV's in the front yards of single Family homes should continue to be prohibited. wet me asst year, a numionr ui puiouc mnn cinya wnre i,niu vy iwci, ci,n Planning commi.seion and the Public Safety Commission. Repreaentativee of the recreational vehicle group were involved in diecueeione alth staff and the two commissions. A aide range of ieeues were raieed during these meetings, and it became apparent that !ha only reel question ie the storage cf recreational vehicles in the front yards of single family homes. Sxiatinq restrictions on public street perking and zequirementa For screening and maintenance, which were also diecuseed, were stated Ndf to be an issue for the RV group representatives. POffi.IC SAPEIR COIYQ88IQ1 IOSVIEY: The Public 6afety Commission was charged with a revi¢a of the current ordinance from the perspective of public safety. The Public 6afety Commission reviewed information on eight lines and vi ei.bility conf lists, slope conditions, and other safety and security conaide rations. ](ey information presented to the Commission Ss attached to this report. At the conclusion of its review, the Public 6afety Commission recommended to the City Council that no change he made to the present ordinance. However, the Public Safety Coenaieaion has also recommended that if for some reason the City Council determines that modifications to the current ordinance are appropriate, that the following be considered: "If the cegulationa affecting the storage of certain recreational vehicles in front yard areas are to be relaxed, the following criteria should be used: a. Only self-propelled, self-contained, and fully secured vehicles such ae motor homes, house cars, and campers mounted un pickups may be stored in the required front yard areas. b. Such vehicles may not extend over a public sidewalk or right- of-say line, nor may ti:ey be stored within 10 feet from the back of sidewalk or right-of-way line. c. Vehic lee stored in the front yard may not be located within 5 feet of the residence, garage, or other structure. d. No vehicles may be stored on slopes exceeding 10 percent." 8(~ CITY COUNCIL STAPP REPORT P.y .w.w~ - vIi^r OF ea_yrpO ~•CAXOKvF June•19, 7991 Page 3 PLaNMING COMQSEIg1 R{VI61tr The Planning commission alacuseione Mere On r, matters of land use, eeethetica, maintenance, and on the feaeibi llty of enforcement. The Planning Commission considered modifications of time limi ta, possible grandfathering, and development of standards based or. typae of vehicles stored. other cities' regulations were also reviewed. This information ie also attached. The Planning Commission concluded Sts review with a recommendation that the current ordinance be retained, but thnt the time limits on parking in the front yard ereee be extended from 26 hours to tive d+~• ^~ ^^^t+^~'^^^ ^_r.c_ry. ..la wouia maze the time limits rnndetent with restrictions on other vehicles. The commission also suggested thnt if the Council desired further modifications, additional Flexibility could be considered under a permitting process, with appropriate criteria to be developed. SON01a/m11CiASI011i The Commissions' review of Recreational Vehicle regulations has now been completed. The Public Safety Commissicn recommends that the current ordinance be retained as ie. The Plnnninq commirsion recoaamnde that the current ordinance be retained, with a relaxntlan of time limits from 2d hours to five days. Hoth Comml eaiona concur that if the Council feels addl tional modifications are necessary. specific criteria such as miniamm setbacks and restrictions based on the type of vehicle would be needed. In that event, the Planning Commission would suggest a possible permitting process. The City Council should review these recommendations and provide staff with appropriate policy direction. Reepec ly sub e Brad ller City Planner BH:oR/ifs Attachments= Exhibit "A" - Ordinance No. 360 Exhibit "H" - Planning Commission Staff Report and idraft) Minutes of May 22, 1991 Exhibit "C^ - Rublic Safety CommSealon Staff Report and Minutes of December d, 1990 t ORDINANG N0. 360 AN OROLNANC6 OP 1EE CITT OOONCIL OP 1tiB CITY 0! RAEC80 WGMDNCA. GLIlOENIA, AMENDING BDBSECTION 37.08.070-C AND 17.12.030-B, AND ADDIIL' A NEW SODSEGTIOP 27.10.050-0 1b TA6 RANC!10 COGMDNCA MONICI HII, CODs PERTAINING TO 9~ICLE PARRIII. WI'111IN RE8IDENTIAL, COMMERCW.(OBPIC6 AND INDDSTRIAL DISTRICTS A. Recitals. (i) Ov !Yy 23, 1988• the Planning Cauiteion of the City of Rancho Cucaronp mnducgd • duly mtiad pool is bearing rith respect to the folioring proposed rendaent to Title 17 of the Eanebe Capaoaga Muaicipl Code (hereinafter releaed to to the "Derelopent Code") reprding regulations for vehicle parking rithin residentiali csuereial and indnatrial district^ of the City. (iU At the eovclneion of said !Yy 25, 1988. pnbl is hearing, she, Planning Co•tiasion adopted its Resolrtion No. 88-108 thereby seceatending that this Council adopt the proposed Davelopeent Code aundeents as set forth in this Ordinance. (11~U On June 25. 1988. the City Council of the City of Raneho Cucu.onga conducted • duly notigd public bearing ritb respect to the proposed Developaent Code pend.enta a Nt Eorth herein and said bearing ru concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordivana. (iv) All legal prerequlaited prior to the adoption of this Ordivance have occurred. H. Ordinance. lii8 CITY ODDNCIL OP YEE CITY OP RANWO WGlUNGA DOES NENEBY ORIMIN AS fOI.IAWS: SECTION It Tbat all of the frets set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are trv and correer. SECTION 2: Subsection 17.08.070-C of the Developaent Code of tha City of Rancho Llttatonga is hereby aendad to read, in rorda and figures, as fol lora: C. vehicle Parkin. ffie parking of vehicles in all residential districts shall be aub~ect to the folloring ptovisionn ~~ CX~~~1;~ ~ ordinance No. 360 Page 2 1. 35;e 4dgn guidelines and regulations for parking areas shall contour to tfie providona of Chapter 37.12 of the INVeloieent Code; 2. Vehicle parking sht12 6e ritA in the enclosed garage, carport or otbet required or auchoriaed oft-street paved parking area; 3. All puking arsaa with in public vier Eras the street, public tight-ofway or adjacent propertin shall be paved with • penanent naoiwe ~.»:!~ ~,.,~ area waii oe +aintained in • useable condition tree of potholes and brokee wctiona auftlcieat to pre-ent and and/or drat, without accuanlation o! loop aarerlel or other deterioration; 4. Vshiclea +ay be psrbd oc rtored in [he aide or rear yard provided that arch srea i^ acrpned frw vier ire the serset, puDl is right-ot-rq and adjacent prapeniea ly a tenca, rail, or equivalent acraeniag utecial ac leapt Five (S) feet in htigbt; 5. Vehicle parking rit6ln side and rear yard arsaa shall be li+iud to Five pezcens (Sf) of the total lot Brea or five hvodred (500) agrare feet, rhiehevez is greater, unless rnnrtrueted pursuane to an approved Minor !)evelopaent Reviar; 6. S:cept a provided in Subsection 9 herein, vehicles parked within public vier in regrired of anthoziaed parking area within the front yard, comet side yard or aide yard alwtting • street shall be parked or left sesnding for twporary periods oP ti+e not to e7:ceed five (S) consecutive days; 7. •Vehiclea• a urd in tb is section shall include, but not he liaised co, cawercial vehicles, autoaobiles, trucks, eralUra, aotor truclu, aeai-srailerq aotorrycles, +opedq tupen, upper shells, boau or other large portable recreational and eonaercial equi paent: and 8. No coaaerciai vehicle rbich exceeds a grope raight of one and one-half (1 and 1/2) tons, or ezceeds a ridth of eighty (80) inches or a:ceeda a Neighs of seven (7) feet of a=cseda • length of trenty-five (25) feat; no special iced rork related vehicis (e, g, tortruck, atakebed [rucks, etc.) and no special iced rork reLted portable puipwnt (e. g. ewent afsers, trailers, etc.); abd'. he parked on airy portion of a residential lot unlesr. (ll it is aetiwly involved in asking 8~ k~h;~6,~ ~ OrdlnanG No. 360 page pick-ups and deliveries; (2) in connection rich, end in aid to the pe:loraanea o! • urvia to, or on, the property there the vehicle i^ parked, rhile actively involved in each activity; or (3) in mnfonance rich the mndition^ of approval for a valid Neae Occupation Penit •• provided in Section 17.04.060 of the Develolsent Code: ]b private, non-coaaercial aehicle rhich a:eeeda a gto as refight of one and one-half (1 sad 1/2) tone, or eaeeeds r ridth of tighq (BO) inches. .....~..?: - «.ighc or scree (71 feet or eaceeda a length o! treaty-five (25) feet; and no trailer, wi-traAer, boat or porp6le reczeatiettal equipmt shall be parked or stored rithln the front yard, corms aide yard or aide yard abateing a strut unleut (1) it is not a cwaarcial vehicle and i• parked for • tsaporary priod of alas not co exceed erenty-lour (24) house; (2) it is involved 1a loading or unlwding activityi and (3) it is prlud in mapliance rich any other applicable City ordinanG; 10. Violation of ash provision of this avbwction shall 6e pwiahable a an infnttion. SBCPION 3: Subsection 17.12.030-B(B) of the DevdoPent Code of the City of t4nchn Cuesaonga i• hereby sanded to read, in rorda and figurer, as follore: 8. Arty pmndaty paved driveray or eztensian of the priaaq driveray shall not M used for parking unleaas (1) it connects the pciaary dziveray weess to a second acpas point rith the arrest or public righo-of-ray (i.e. circular drivaray) rith a continuous pwsent ridth not eaeeeding trelve (12) fart/ (2) it is an eatenaion of the pr iaaty driverq tovard the usenet aide or rear yard arse; or (3) fie mnRrnM ed pursuant to ao approved Ninor Developsmt Bevies. SECTION 4: SuMect ion 17.10.050-0 ie hereby added to the Developaent Code of the City of Rancho Cucaaonga to bt read, in rorda and figures, as follwe: Vehicle Parking. the parking of vehicles in all maurcial/ of tia and industrial districts shall be aubj act to the tollaring provisioner 1. The design guidel fines and facil itiee shall mnfon to 17.12 of the Dtvelopaent providons of she Indnetrial regulations for parking the praviaiona of (Lapeer Code and ash applicable Specific Plan; -l Ordinance No. 360 page 4 pebicle parking shall be rithin buildings, garages or other required or authorised off-street paved parking r Yscil =flea. 3. All puking !sail =flea rithin prbl it vier from the street, pabl is right-of-ray or adj rcent property shall b< paved rith a permanent paving aren=a!. Such area shall 6e maintained in ^ uaesble condition free of potholem and broiun wctiom sufficient to prerent mud and/or deaf, rithoat accuulation of loose material or other deterioration; 4. Ib vehicle 'ball M parked for the purpop of displaying eve6 vehicle for al• or ocher wueroial actin ity, including, but not limited to, lease, him, advartiaieg, etc. unless suth vehicle is parked by, or rich the rsitnn prminion ot, • brsineu on the property rhich is penitted, liGnsrd and approved to display vehicles for anch purpo sec, 5. tb vehicle shall bt parlud for the pocpoae of repair or aaintenanu unless: (i) ouch cork is petfoaed on vehicles orned or operated b7 the omsite business rithin an enclosed building or yard area aereeeed from view from the street, public rightrof-wy, adjannt properties and required off-street parking Facilities ritb public ease ss: or (2) in mnn.etion rit6 • currant orsite 6usinesa permitted to perfon repair or msintenance of vehicles and only during ertsbi !abed busiaeN hours= Ho vehicle rbieh is disabled, unlianaed, unregistered, inoperative or from rbieh an espntid or legally regrirad operating part is rseoved or misting shall be parked rithin prbiic vier from she street: public right-ofway, adjacent properties or required off-street parking facilities rith public aceesr, go cauercial vehicle ezceeding a gross weight of one and onrhalf (1 and I/i) tons, or a:carding ^ width of eighty (80) inches, or • trailer or seal-erailer shall be parked rithin • commercial/office district unless: (1) it is screened Prom public vier Pram the street, public right-of- ray and sdjannr properties; (2) it i^ actively involved in making pick-ups sad deliveries; or (3) in connection rith. and in aid to, the performance of a service to, or on, the property rhere the vehicle is parked, chile actively involved in such activity; q I t,c~r~b~ {- H'~ Ordiunce No. 360 Page 5 8. '•lehicles• as urd in thin atecion shall include, but not be llaited to, couerclal vehicles, autwobilss, tracks, trailers, adios truth, awi-trailara, '" motorcycles, wopds, cuprs, cupr shells, boats or ocher large prtable recreatioul or ecaaercisl equipaenti 9. Violation of asry provision of this a:sbsection shall be pmsishabie as an infnctim. SECTION 5s The Cin Council dwclaras that. ~au1d ono mmrl Nnn_ section, pngrapb, ratmce or cord of chin Ordiunce 6e raadared or declared irnal id by my fiul court action is • court of ewptmt jurisdiction, or bq rwaon o! a::p praaptiva legislation, the rwaiaing provisions, uctiona, pragraphs, rntenees, sad cords o! this Ordiunee shall Twain in full torte end of rect. SBCTION 6: The lYyor shall sign: thin Ordiuncs and the City Clerk shall canr the sue to be published rithin liftwn (15) days after its parge et least once in The Daily Report, • nwappr of general circalation pablisbed in the City of Ontario, 411tornia, and circulated is the City o! Rancho Cucwonga, California. The Mayor shall sign thin Ordiunee and the City Clerk shall canr the sue co be published rithin Eifceen (IS) days after its gauge at lent once in The Daily Report, a narsppr o! geural circalatioe published in she City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Ranebo Cucwonga, California. PASSED, APPROPED, and ADOPI2D this 6ih day of July, 1488. AIRS: Broro, Buquwt, Stout, Ring, Night NOffi: None ABSENT: None nnis L. Stoat, lYyor ATTEST: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk 9a- Y~h;~,'~ A.5 Ordiunce No. 360 Page 6 I, Sg9BR4T A. AUTRd1.E1', CIT! CGERE of the City of Rancho Cueuonge, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordiunce •aa introduced •t a regular aeeting of the Council of the Ciq of Rancho Cncuonga ~' held on the 15th day of dwe, 19RR, and vu finally pard tc a regular aeeting of the City Council of the Ciq of Ranebo Cucuonga beld on the 6t6 day of July, 1986. R:ecuted thin 1th day of duly, 1988 at Rancho Cucaaonga, Glifornia. esly Authelet, City Clerk '12 ~X h ~ ~ ~ ~ /l W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC.A STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7Z, 1991 ~ TO: Chairman and Neavoen of tM Planntnq Commiuion PRON: Brad Bul lar, City Planner , BI: Otto Eroui il, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL. VxNIC*e TO are Rwiw of cutrant City "-`-~-"--- ~~~ ':..y •wrage anc parking of Ricieational vehieUS on privets ramldwtlal properties. I• BBSTRACT: This report Beale with reerutional whirls storage in front yard arpe of eingla family homae. The report outline raeomswndatlone made by flu Public Safety Comeiuion and provide additional in[ormation a rsqueetsa by the Planning Co®lealon. Then report conclude with four 6uie policy opt ions, or cholcn, to b• considered by Lhm Planning Co®Saalon following a public hmarinq. II. BACAGAOUND: This reviw of the Clty'• Recreational vehicle Ordinance was Lnitiated by the Clty Council. Tha Counell requuted Ghat tvo City co:mipions, the Public Safety Co®iuion and then planning commLrion, rmviw the a:ietlnq atdinance and coma back to the City Council with their zecommendatlons. III. pDBLIC SAFETY COldI38ION EN The Public Safety CommLeion was charged witA a reviw of the currant ordinance from the perspsct ive of public safety. Tha Public Safety Commission has concluded its reviw of the Rsersational Vshiels Ordinance. TM Public Safety Commission is reconmmndinq to the Clty Council that no changes G made to the pzepni ordinance. However, tM Public Sataty Co®iuion hu aLo rwommandad that if for soma sawn the City Council deGrmips that moditieatione to the currant ordinance aza appropriate, CM following factors should M considered: "If the rsquLtlons affwtlnq the Korage of certain ncrptionel vehlcUa in front yard arau era to W relaxed, the follwinq criteria should b• used: a. only self-propelled, salt-contained, and Cully eeeurad vehicles such a• motor hamoe, hoop ears, and campers mounted on piekupe may W stored in the required front yard areas. b. Such vehicles may not extend over a public sldwtlk or right-of- way linen, nor py they b~ stored within 10 [pt from the back o[ •idawalk or right-of-way linen. R4 ~Iffile(' ~~ ~ PLANN INO COMMISSION STAPP REPORT E:• STORAGE - C:TI OF ,W:CMO CGCidiwNGA May P], 1991 ' Page 2 e. Vehielu stored in the front yard may not be located wLChln 5 fast of the ru idence, garage, or other structure. d. No vehicles may ~w storatl on slopes exceeding 30 psreant.^ The PuDlle Satety Coamluion recommender lone era Lncluded M[e for your Lnfoxmatlan only. They will be Corwarded to the Clty Council along with the rwommendation of the Planning Cammluion. _.. ^__...._°_ ....:~:......... __._~. _. Piuminq ucmauaon nu already dLcuuad ibis Suue on uveral occuiona. In thou dieouuiona, alw involving tM repruantativee of the reesatlonal vehicle group, the issue was narrowd down to private sealdeneiai peopertiee only public strut parking la not w loos at Chia time. Staff wu requutad to look into specific ltme, to sN if there is a way to relax ihs uLtinq rutrictions while uintaininq a ruwnable degru o[ Control and at the sear lSms uwss that the ordinance eu W applied equitably. Tha itme staff was requuted to ezulne included maintuana luuu, timing reetrietions, grandtatharinq, wd coneidsration of davelopinq different atwdards tos difterant lypea of vahiclu. It was alw noted that the Public safety Co®Leion's rwo®andatlan should W considered before the Plwninq Comiuion Llnallsad it^ recomurndation io the City council. v. MAINTENANCE ISSUES: Tha long term gemral maintuuce of all City neighborhoods is eLarly a quution of public hulth, ufety, and welfaro. This includes adequate maintenuu of eerue2uru, yards, parkways, and lteu atorsd in public vlw, including recrutional vahiclu. Tha Ara-1988 ordinance doling with RV'^ relied on vehicle sulntenance provisions to pramte public health, ufety, ud welters goal. UnfortunaGiy, !M ordinance ra ineffaetlve, in that it wu only able to deal rith the mat flagrant violations. Tha Codm Enforcement oLLice rmeivad smny calls [rw ruidenta ob]ectinq to the parking of rscrutional vahiclu in tMit neighborhood. Rowewr, many of the vahielaa reyortsd as being in poor condition did mt constitute clear violation under the ordinances tMrefore, the City could not force their remval. ey nacusity, all maintenanea requLrearnb tend to be eubjwtive. Itau such a flat tiro and inoparatiw, unllcensW vehicles era euy to idutify. Mowwer, the grist ma]osity of maintenance cuu are in a marginal condLtion and suD]act to intazpretaiion and valve ]udgmenc• which do not Nwd legal aesu!lny. Tha eosssunity, wd Coda Enforcement staff in the field, mst have a clus and ueily explainable ut of rule to work with to W sffwtive. 9S ~~~ PLANNING C[xU1IasICN ST11Pf A6PORT Ry 570AAGE - CI^aY aF RANCNQ CUCiYON9P. Nay 11, 1991 Pa9a 3 vi. TIME L:NLTSx ex tsCinq requlationa doling with ALL vahielaa (not just RV'si dUtinqulah betwwn •storaga,^ which i^ eoneiderad permanent, and ^parklnq,• which ie considered to ba of a temporary, non- continuous nature. Currant raqulattone prohibit all "etoraga• in residential front yard araasj NO vehicle (or other Stws ouch w equipment, uUriaL, ate.) may be permanently stored in front yards. Puwnoer vehle Le era ~ n.lw~r.w _ _ _ o[ continuous parking. Reereatlonal4 vehicU•r - yaya equlationa •ara•curwntly more restrietlvu AV'• era eonaidared •atorad• oiler only 2L hours of continuous grkinq. ono of the rueone for the rive-day Llml! on pauenger vehicle L that vehicle which era In continual uw ue by nueuity in operating condition and era rewonably wall elntainad. Alw, vehicle that ors moved oltw cannot aceumuLU debris around and under lhes. By contrast, vahlelu which era permanutly stored do noE necweiGN continual maintenances duet and debris ueily accumulate, weeds and lows became more difficult to control, and a conselutlou^ effort 6y tM owner U required to maintain the vehicle and its lmmadiAL eurroundinge in adequab condition. In sGff'^ experience, a large proportion o! vehlelee currently stored in vloletlon of the five-day limit era also a maintuanre probles. TN rims limit provide a tangible and uforceabla tool to del with pawenger vehicle malnbnanee problame. similar ooneidantlone apply to other vahielaa, including RV •s. Nowwer, from a elntenanca perepeetive, Lhere la no advantage in kwplnq the RV raqulatiow more ruirictiw than requlatlone for other vahielw. Mod ifleatlons to the exietlnq ordinance could W made to eliminate the dLtinction betwwn RV'• antl other whieUe, and apply a fivrday parking limit Co both. The net result would W flat recreational vehicle weld not be eonaldered •etored• until after five days of eontlnuoue parking, and requlationa delinq with Ytorage^ weld not kick in udtil that point. This would give the AV owners additional flexibility, rithouL impairing the City•e ability to retain a high level of maintenanN in Sts neighborhoods. VII. CRANDPATNERING• •dxandfatherlnq• Se a crane to utablleh • legal right to continua an activity which la no longer permitted by current requlationa. staff wu requuted to InvutlgaG the poulbllity of •grendfatharlnq• pro-exietinq recrutional vahiclas. This weld allow reenational vehicles which had bun atorad in front yards prior to the adoption oP currant regular ions to continua to G crowed in the front yards. 9 ~ '~'~ pL11NNING COIQIISSION STaFr REPORT RV STCRACr - CITY OF RARCBC CJCAMCRCA May ]], 1991 Page Thera era several legal and practical problama with thin approach rirat, tM non-conforming (or 'grandfatMrtnq•) elaula is normally used to permit tM wntinualSon of activities which haw been legally utabliahed in tM fist place. M nw lava era adopted, pre-exiting but legally utabl iahed actlvltias ari 'grandtatMred in^ and allowed to tontlnue. The pre-1988 oMlnanty did not permit atorage of RV•• in the front yards without rutriMioM. patMS, tM etoraw of vy •e in the front yards vas permitted in • very limited rraa (hatvwn the dclveway uul tM nearest side property line). Thus, many of kM AV's rhlch d0 not mwt today's zequlatlone would aLo violate tM pre-ezletinq ordinance and could not M 'grandlathered.• Second, there L. no praatical way to debtmine whether • vehicle has Men stored in a given loeatioa rfnee Mfore tM date of tM ordinance. Thle means that nw atorage lotationa could M established in violation o[ tM new ordinance with na way of enforeernt. TM only solution to this U io •grandfalMr• ~ RV'• stored Coday (in violation O! both Cha pre-1988 Ordinance and current requlationa). Third, there L • queetlon of equitabL application of Clty rsqulations. If existing whieUS are •gtandfatMred• and pasmitCed to M stared in fron! yard., but neighbors wM easplied with current zequlatlons are not permitted to uN tMir property Ln like manner, problass in entorewnC are wry Likely to dwelop. Given tMO considerations, staff doe. not consider "grandlatherlnq^ practical option for addrosinq this Lesw. VIII. STAwpARD3 BY TYPE Or VEMICLEe TM COmlUlon aekW atlff to examine whetRes atorage standatda could M developed by the type of vehicle, conddezinq tM type o! probles which may M ueoeiatad with euh type. TM following clauiflcatlons reprosMt the types of whielee commonly found In ruidentlal neighborhoods !n thL caaetunity~ ~BB~iQ Van Conversion Chassis Mounted Camper Moweeas - 18-40 feet converted sus q~ ~'% PLANNING COMNISBION BTAPF RBPORT RV STOMG6 - CITY G7 RANCHO CUGNONGA Hey 22, 1991 Page 5 TBdf•xxe Ut111ty/Tlat Bad Trailer Special Purpose Tra1Ur Box/Enclosed Trailer CampingfTent Trailet NOtM/etoek Trailer House Trailer 12-75 fNt Pifth WhNl Trailer 20-60 feet B0AT9 ITNIIILER81 Row aoac Opert Bolt (Trailer) 12-30 twt Sall Boat (Trailer) 30-75 tNt Cabin Cruiaar (Trailer) 16-]B tact xousaboat (Trailet) 20-75 feat Unawunted Shall (Portable) Vnmountad Camper Camper (Mounted on Pick-up) MOTOACYCLS/A+_r. TtRRaIN VtBICLta Motorcycle/Dirt Bike (Not Street Legal) All Terrain VMiele (3-whNl, awhNl, Not Street Legal) MopN/NOtorired Bicycle (StrNt Lagtl) Matoreycla (BCrNt Legal) ors-Row vaxlccta TROT sTRasT LEOwi bum Buggy Off-Road VBhiele (Jeep, Truck, VN, etc.) Of!-Road Red Vahiclo ROId Raee GI Although there era a Lrge number of reepatiowl vehicle types, potential problsu associated with Noh era similar in nature. The Public 6afety Ccasiadon had looked at thin option [ram the penpeetive o! aatNy and agrNd tMt therm era wally just two groups of recsNtional vehielua 1. ae11-contained, wlC-propelled, and lolly NNrwd vMiclN each H motor homes, houw cut, and campeia On truake7 and All otheni each a boats, tralUre, oft-road whicUa, etc. rrom the point of view of mainUnanee and land use, a similar distinction can be drawn a wall. Vehicles rhieh eaa W drivN and era lignaad to be operated on public streets spuire a substantial degrN of maintenanw and era Nsler to control. w 9~ ~.~ PLANNING COMMISSION STMF REPORT RV STORAGE - CSTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA Miy 22, !991 Page 6 ' Should Lhe CoenLsion chairs to modl[y the exlating ordinance to permit the storage of certain typsa of recrwtional vehieLs in tM front yards, eta[! wggwta that only sal!-contained, calf-propelled, and lieenaed vehielw M permitted in [root yard areas. iX. AVAILABLE OPTIONS, Than are a number of policy optiorta available tax eoneidaration. The basic ehoiew era: 1. IcEEP aYISTING OPDINANCL A8 Ie. This would continue to prohibit RV parking in !root yards and drlvewaya for more than 2{ hours. 2. REEF EXISTING OIGIINNIVa, au• tiL:.: •. -.. __. +'.~" n..t /an wind keep existing rwerLetiom on "storage" of TRV'e, but exuod the period during which RV'^ may M °parkad° in lroni yard areas to five days (or other appropriate limit). 3. REVISE ORDINANCE TO PERMIT [ROHT YARD STORAGE of SELF-COMTAIMED AND BEL/-PROPELLED VENICLEe ONLY. This mould saes tM rweriotione on motor hags and aimllar whielu, Dut continue the cvsenC restrictions tot boats, trailers, and other vehicles as noted In the repot!. 4. REVISE ORDINANCE TO PERMIT ?RON't YAEO STORAGE OT ALL RECREATIONAL vENICLEe. This option mould permit the storage o! all rwraatianal vehicles in the front yard arses subiect to ruintenanca regulations. X. RECON}IENDATION: It is reeomended that the Comaiulon again obtain public input on thew iuuu and either: 1. Direct etatf to prepare appropriate changes to the text of the ordinance, or 2. Forward !te polity recomendation to tM City Council toe consideration, along wish the recaaxaendation of the Public ea[sty Brad ~~Lat /~j,~/~ City P anner AGtachmentsa txhibit •A" - Planning Cammlglon Etetf Iuport datW June 2T, 1990 Exhibit "B" - Ordinances No. 360 8xhibit •C" - Summary of Surrounding Cities' Regulations 99 ~ 'T!' fI'I'Y OF RbIVCHs1 l.'Ui'.A:11L1MtiA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 27, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enfa rcement Supervisor SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE - Review of current City I regu at ons affecting storage and parking of RVs on private residential properties BACKGROUND: At their May 15, 1990, meeting, the City Council reviewed the current Recreational Vehicle Ordinance. its history, and the enforcement procedures currently in use. Asa result of this review and Dublic testimony requesting the Ordinance be amended, it was determined that additional information was needed to accurately assess current regulations. The matter was referred to the Planning and Public Safety Commissions for review, their recommendatia ns to be forwarded back to the City Council. rt, HISTORY: Prior to 1988 regulations regarding vehicle parking and storage restricted parking on both public and private property. Recreational vehicles were restricted from being parked overnight on City streets. On private residential property, they could be stored in the side yard, rear yard, or within the front yard area only on an improved surface between the driveway and the nearest side property line. Since the establishment of a Code Enforcement Program, Lhe City received a substantial number of calls requesting the relocation of stored recreational vehicles. Residents objected to the storage of boats. trailers, motor homes, camper shells, and similar vehicles in public view and adjacent to their driveways. Concerns were raised wfth large vehicles stored behind the sidewalk, interfering with vis iDility, and with the effect these vehicles may have on the quality of the neighborhood and property values. In addition. the appearance and maintenance of some of the RVs were of great concern to many residents. As a result of these numerous complaints, revised requirements were developed which dealt more specifically with recreational vehicles. Prior to adopting the regulations, public hearings were held by both the Planning Commission and the City Council. PLANNING COMMISSf O' 'TAFF REPORT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE .1L'NE 27, 1930 Page 2 III. CUAR ENT REGULATIONS: The revised Ordinance, in effect since August of 1 8 resulted in two material changes. first, rec reatio not vehicles may no longer be stored (parked for more than 24 hours) within the front yard area. Second, recreational vehicles stored in side or rear yard areas must be at least partially screened from public view. The regulations are contained in 5ubsec tian 17.08.070-C of the Development Lode isee Exhibit ..a«). No changes have a:curred in public street regulations - overnight na rYinn of ove .. ~..~u. . ._ _. ~__. .~ ... .C.. .3n~uwca w ue rnuriu cea. Story ae: Current rcgula [ions are intended to discourage the storage of vehicles in front yard areas, and other yard areas within public view. A specific time period is defined in the Ordinance as constituting storage of a vehicle. Passenger vehicles (those vehicles not defined as a recreational vehicle) are considered to be stored after 5 days of continuous parking. Recreational vehicles are considered to be stored after 24 hours of continuous parking. Exceptions are provided to allow storage of recreational vehicles during loading and unloading operations. Sc reen in Current regulations are intended to require screening of all vehicle parking and storage areas located in the side or rear yard of a residence. Screening of the area can be accomplished by a view obscuring fence, wall, gate, ar with landscaping of at iea st 5 feet in height. Tall vehicles such as motorhomes and boats are not required to be completely hidden from view. General Re uirements: The :sa jortty of the parking rcgula tlo ns in res entia areas aDD1Y to all vehicles. They do not deal specifically with rec reat is nal vehicles, but are applicable. Vehicle parking is limited to improved paved areas, a limited portion of the lot area, and in specific locations such as driveways and enclosed yards. Regulations prohibit the parking or storage of oversize comae n:ial vehicles in residential areas completely. Land Use Aeauirements: Vehicle parking and storage requirements are a part of broader development and design sty rdards that govern alt aspects of residential growth. TAese standards are intended to promote and protect the physical, social and economic stability of residential districts, Special consideration is given to the effect of a use on surrounding properties with regard to public health, safety, welfare, peace, convenience, and the reasonable enjoyment of the property. 1~1 ~~? PLANNING LOMMI55I0' -TAPE REPORT RECREATIONAL VEN ICS- STORAGE ~VNF i7, iGyil Page 3 The City's current regulations reflect a sta Mard that is applied to all items of storage in residential areas. Building materials, hou sehald items, storage containers, etc., have been required to be stored within the garage or an enclosed yard area since the adoption of the Oevelopme nt Code. Storage requirements were established to ensure the proper maintenance of residential areas for aesthetic, health and safety reasons. The requirements for the storage of recreational vehicles was intended to meet this same standard. o... ,...,.:.. __, ~~ncu. na uei iOeti in ~UaseC lion 17.08.070-- 9 ,~a~rec reatfona vehicle is a~ of the following: Anon-comae rc ial vehicle: 1. Exceeding a gross weight of one and one half (1 6 1/2) tans, 2. Exceeding a width of eighty (80) inches, 3. Exceeding a height of seven (7) feet, or 4. Exceeding a length of twenty-five (25) feet. A trailer or semi-trailer (fifth wheel trailer). A boat (boat and trailer) Any portable recreational equipment. IV. REGULATION IN OTHER CITI'cS: Na ny cities have recreational veh rt le parking and storage regulations. Most commonly, as with Rancho Cucamonga, these regulations are a part of the general parking requirements applicable to all vehicles. The range of regulations directed specifically at recreational vehicles varies greatly from city to city. Also varying greatly is the degree of enforcement that is directed at these regulations. In all cases, matters of public safety receive the highest priority. Vehicles blocking sidewalks, creating visibility prablens ar other hazards are the subJect of regulation and enforcement. The types of regulations dealing spn:i fically with recreational vehicles on residential property renge from none, to complete restriction from front yard areas (see Exhibit "B"). Cities such as Fontana have no specific RV requirements, allowing these vehicles to he parked in the same manner as any other vehicle. In contrast, the City of Upland restricts RVs completely from front yard areas, requiring screening to keep the vehicles out of public view. The maJority of local cities have some restrictions on the storage of RVs in the front yard. Enforcement of these regulations l02 ~j,8 PLANNING COMMISS[0' 'TAFF REPORT RECREATIONAL VENICE. STORAGE JUNE 2;. 1996 Page 4 in most titles is consistent with other regulations dealing with private property. Basic parking issues are not a high priority, and often enforcement personnel are not provided for thfs purpose. Staff is still in the process of researching other cities programs. V. PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES: The Public Safety Commission at their June 12, 1990 meet n~ld a public hearing on rec reatto nal vehicle storage as it relates to public safety. As a result, the Commission has dire:ted staff to research several concerns and to hrino b>rL a_dAi Hnw;l ~a_.. ~~~T _ .. ac in wrm u~y a re,:ommendation to the City Council. Spa:ific issues irm; laded: sight line vfsfbility, eethods of securing trailers in driveways, hazards related to the sW rage of unmounted campers or equipment, and specific desc rfptions of the types of vehicles and equipment encompassing the term "rec rcat tonal vehicle." VI. RECOMMENDATION: The City regulations are a combination of requirements intended to ma iota to both the aesthetic quality of the community and to safeguard the public from potential threats to public health, safety, or welfare. The Planning Commission, through review of the current Recreational Vehicle Ord ins n:e, should make a recommendation to the City Council as to the suitability of these regulations for ma fntafn tog the development standards in the City's residential districts. Re sp e< y sub d, B ra r City anner BB:R A:mig Attachnents: Exhibit "A" - Ordinance No. 360 Exh lb it 'B" - Matrix of other Cities' Regulations Appendix - Sample RV Storage Regulations io3 ~-9 VEHICLE PARKING AND 570RAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY CI Y SPE C QU RNN GNRL QU MN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AlL VEHICLES. INCLUDING RV's RANCHO NO STORAGE N[TH IN THE FRONT YARD PAYED SIIRFAf.i eroccwlur C~Crv:vi:un nniti, rNn K1 nG l1M[iED TO 24 REQU IREO IN SIDE ANO RERR CONSECUTIVE HDQRS. YARD AREAS, S[ZE LIMITS. UPLAND NO STORAGE NITHIN THE FRONT YARD PAYED SURFACE, HEIGHT LIMITS SETBACK, OLT OF VI EN IN SIDE OR AND NON-MOTORIZED EQUIPMENT REAR YARD AREAS. IS CONSIDERED STORAGE, ONTARIO NONE. FONTANA NONE. RIALTO NONE, NONE. CANNOT BLOCK THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF•NAY (SIDENALK). PAVED SURFACE, ONE TON HEIGHT LIMIT FOR COMMERUAL VEHICLES. CHINO GROSS HEIGHT OVER 2000 POUNDS, 72 HOURS MAXIMUM IN FRONT OR EXPOSED YARD AREAS. NORCO REAR TARD ONLY, NI1H A LIMIT ON THE AMOUNT OF TARD AREA USED FOR STORAGE. MONTC LA IR NONE. CLAREMONT SIDE OR REAR YARD ONLY, MUST 8E BEHIND A 5 f007 H[GH Y(EN OBSCURING FENCE OR GATE. EXHIBIT "v (DL{ PAVED SURFACE, HEIGHT LIMIT FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES. NEiGHT LIMIT FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, PERMITS LAN BE OBTAINED FOR ONNER/OPERATION, PAVED SURFACE, HEIGHT LIMIT FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, PAYED SURFACE, HEIGHT LIMIT FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, ~•~o UP..aFT FOR ~IS.:.USjiviV PtiRFzGSi_S ONLY R. AECRSATIONAL VEHICLB STORAGH - Review of current City raqulat ions affecting atorage and parking of Recreaticnal vehicles on private residential properties. Otto Rrout il, Deputy Clty Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman HcNisl opened the public hearing. Irene Luevanor 7728 Hontacito Court, Rancho Cucamonga, presented a letter in support of retaining the existing ordinance. she showed two plciuro depict inq a boat on a trailer stored in s driveway wAich ohs fa}t constituted an unsafe condition. she presented a petition signed by 34 homsown•rs living near the boat. She pet}tionsrs were In favor of retaining the ordinance and .____ oo :ccn- ,,,.. yazkanq conguuon, vLUal obstruction of pedestrian traffic, and ~pobntlal lawerinq of aeatAetic value of the nelghbarhood. Ma. Luevano reported that she had previously 3}vW in B1 Monts and nt that time she fought to b• pscmltted to park hsz RV on her lot Aut the driveways in 81 Monte are longer. Sh• indicated that her own Rv Le not parked at her home because she felt the driveways in Terra Vista are too short to accommodate atorage and the CCLAS state that RVs csnnoL bs stored within view of the etr•et. she requoted that the moratotlum on enfarcemsnt be removed. Suzanne Tucker, 6575 Aeh Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that fifth wheel trai laze, boats, and RVs ors Ln her neighborhood. She said they have long drlveMAya and she felt they should hsve the ability to use the driveways to store RVs. Shs thought that if • vehicle can bs stored aaEsly, it ^hould be a}lowed. Prank Fie her, 6240 Malvern Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he had lived in the city einc• 1967 and owns a boat, motor hams, and fifth wheel. He said the motor home cite in his driveway but does not obstruct anyone's vision. Ha commented that Aia motor home is fully self-contained and can be used to store earthquake supplies. Hs indicated h• had never had any complaints from neighbors. chuck Adinolfi, 7648 P•nnel Road, stated he had lived 1n his home for 30 yenta. He indicated his lot is wide enough to store hie tamper on a special slab and he has stored n camper there for 10 years. He reported that he had invested over $70,000 on his unit. Xe crated there are no AV atorage spaces avai}ebla in Rancho Cucamonga. Re requ•etad an smendman! to the ordinance to permit RV atorage Ln the front yard areas with p•thnpe the addition of screening. Hs felt appearenw and ufety concerns should ba addr•as•d. X• chought that on all new planned communit ins, the developer should e•t land as ids for RV storage. H• said the City affords great consideration for tree preeervetion end trails. X• zequ•stod that tracts M grandfatAer•d in to permit RV atorage. Hs asked if the c1Ly Aed conducted any special .iodine regarding fires oz hazards associated with RVs. Robert Arcinage, 7650 Csll• Caelno, Reneho Cucamonga, objected to Lhe plan to require dw•lopers to set aside land for RVs, Ho tAoughL developers should not be required to set aside land fox a special irtersat group. H• felt RVs Planning commlaeion Minutes e- May 27, 1991 `ps ~~~~7,~~ 'I k DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY should be kept in rear yards, not front yards. Ha thought the ordinance should be kept ae i• or made stronger. Lyle Krebs, 10302 Carrati Street, Ranoho Ncamonga, lair RVe should not be permitted to park on atrwta. Hs thought reaidmte want s polished community ~., and Rv parking creates clutter and Uttar and interferes with street ewebpera. He felt RV perking at hamee causes friction natwaan neighbors. Ha indicated he knew of one men who ie converting • 60-foot bus to a mobile fiome and who le polluiinq the air by spray painting the bus. Ha thought the City ores not strictly enforcing the raetrietion on working on vehielea in driveways or aide yards. William Odom, 7649 Pennel Road, atatad ha did not awn an RV but his hams is in full visor of wveral Rv venr.eaea and nv wuiwi. . - .~._ _..c ordinance is unfair to rwidanta who taW good care ~ofytheir vehicUa and`do not sncrouh on the sidewalk. Ha said he underttood that the ordinance is for safety and the betterment of the community, but ha felt ii should ba directed at those who have unsightly or onsets RVs. Na suggested the City provide a Ctty-run etotaga ores. Ron Zabarth, 9602 La Collna, Rancho Cucamonga, stated ha hw stored an RV on hie lot Eor Wino yeses. Ha suggested that Lf the City decided to rattan the ordinance, the time limit for atoraga should be extwdw to wven days to allow visitors to stay for a work. Ha indicated the ordinance does not cover RV parking on the atrea[a. Re atatad that if grwdfatharing is not permitted, it will penalize the residents who have had RVa in the Clty for s number of yearn and it will change their lifestyle. Ne fall a permit proce9a could ba used Ln which the applicant would have to prove reaideney prior to ordinanea adoption. Ha did not think gtandfatherinq would b• hard to police. Ha said he would be happy to work with the city on defining rscceat tonal vehicles. Sabrina Luboch, 11965 Rua Nay, Ranoho Cucamongs, atatad she had lived in her tract for 14 yesre. she said they had born tlcke[ed for parking their boat in front of their house and thwy were the only house ticketed. Shs said the boat fife on their driveway. she felt that the ordinanea should be applied equally. She esid they have moved the boat to her parents' house, nut it now requires driving nn hour just to pick It up. she thought there is not enough room in the City to atom tM AVa and she felt the iuue should be pLCad on the ballot. Debbie Nolan, 7638 FeMel, Rancho Cucamonga, stated aha had lived in her tract for 14 ysara. she acid they have a traLUt and [aiu their children camping four to Eive tinwa per year. She indicated they Could not afford to pay a 545 per month storaga for. 9ha atatad Chey take pride in their neighborhood. she requested that the issue ne placed on tM ballot and that grandfatharing ba included for older tract •. Don eaneon, 13040 Vista street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated ha had lived in his home 26 ysara. He uid that many retired people have RVa. Ha indicated ha could not afford to pay for RV atoraga, wd ha felt such atoraga was not available anyway, He tavored • gnndfathsrinq clauw. He felt AV owners Planning Commission Minutes AM Nay 22, 1991 I o(o .,$ bF2AF7 ~vR DiSOUS~iON ~'URPOSES ONLY could 6o Leuad • (»rmlt to perk on their property. He said that taxse era Charged on RVa tM same as on automobllea. Ha Kated the City provides equaetrian trail and RVa era merely a diffarwnt form of entertainnwnt. Doug Carlson, 7335 Cambridge livanua, Rancho Cucamonga, asid ha had lived [hare 13 yaara. He raqueatad that the moratoriws on RV parking enforcement W lifted eo enforcement could W reinstituted and the City would look good again. He asked who would da the poi icing on how long an RV Se perked in front of a house. Dave Geyer, 8859 Nol ly Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated h¢ had lived in hie Hems since 1955. He satimated there La en average of four to five AVs per block. Ha felt one of the biggest problems Eating the Clty ie lack of ¢~^~•^^ `c'! `= t..o::gh: ...~ ...,..ec storage avallabU mould ba !n Chino. Jo Ann Johnson, 9683 Bolo, aGtad eW hu bean a resident for 21 yore. eW repotted that one gentleaun had ht• RV damaged while stored at a storage lot and hL inmranw would not cover the damage beeauo the RV wes not stores on hie own property. She ukwd it a record Rad Wan kept of lnjusiee or !tree eauesd by RVa. Chairman HcNiel responded that the Publle Safety Commission had reviewed the RV iaeue. Ha. Johnsen stated eha Rnd not hoard anything about injuries actually happening. Jun¢ Bamer, 13041 Vista Sireat, Rancho Cucamonga, asid she had lived in her Noma for 23 yaara, during wnieh time they generally had an AV. Sha indicated that the ordinance roes enforced only when one neighbor complained about another. cne did not Eaoi the ordinance ie fair and ohs request od that it be lifted. She felt [hare should be certain rules and zequlatione. peering ne further L'eetiawny, Chairman NcNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Valletta asked if RV atosaga could W addressed ee a law enforcement taws as opppaed to • coda enforcement one. Hr. Rroutil rnpliad that the Shatiff generally only handles on-otraet parking. Chairman NeNiel atatwd that if thwre had not besn a problem in 1988, the ordinance would not have boron passed. Ha asid the the ordinances rose pauod following many epspleints about unsightly RV atoraga. Ns indleated that part mf the problem may W that tW City only had enforced LW ordinance in response to complaints. Ho stated that one raeidant had auggeetsd that RVs are a form of recreation comparable to equestrian uaee and he pointed out the City done not allow horses to ba kept in front yrrda either. Ha felt the vast majority of restdont• do not own AVs. Ha thought storage !sell itiea ex LSt even 1f they may be inconvaniant. Ha foie that if demand exists, the facilitioe will be available. Planning Commission Minutes ~- Hay 22, 1991 ~d~ ~~13 CriAFT FOR DISCUSBiON PURPOSES ONLY Commissioner Heleher ieli that it was equally true that the vest majority of residsnt• ao not own horses, but the City wa• looking at equestrian trails at a projected coat of 577,000,000. Ha thought the implementer Lon o! a permitting process msy allow the City to exert s degree of control and he felt each a sugqution should be implemented For • trial period. Commissioner Chitisa felt the Lssuance of psrmlt• was an interesting idea which may be worth ezplozing. she ssked what Commissioner Nslcher would suggest ae parameters. Commissioner Mslehsr mated that the applicant would have to abide by whatever regulations ware set up. Gweul .; m,rr ensure sexes 12 utbaeke from •idswalke should bs 5 het, 30 feet,r or soma other distance. She questioned if scrwninq should W required. she eked what Commissioner He1eMr tQt mlgF.t W appropriate. commissianar HQcher Nlt requirements could include a paved surface, certain setbacks from the front property line, and a prohibition of obstructing more than one-helE of tM gauge. Comoiseionsr ToLtoy etsGd he hatl walked Ln Terra VLta and hs was eurprLSd at what he saw. He reported that RVs wre parked on driveways with their wheels on the •idswalk. Hs felt the view corri+.or was enclosed. se [hough! the currant ordinance Le good and generally RVs should not be parked in fxoni yards. He Esit the idea of issuing permits could be explored. Ha did not feel viaiton should b• able to live Ln RVe for wvsral weeks. He reported that the owner of the storage yard on Base Line Ln the Victoria Area had indicated to him that he wee upset with the lack of customers for his available storage. Coami9eioner Valletta eupporied keeping the current ordinance. She Eelt that a permit process would lead to probable enforcement problems. Mr. Rroutil stated that a permit process is a Coal to achieve a goal. Ha saLd it would first W necessary to know the City'• goal in hewing such a ptocees. He stated there would need to be • definition of requested setbacks, maintenance eiandards, etc. He noted the possible need for staffing and funding. Hs said the City Council would have to decide Lf the potential benefit i• worth Ohs cost. Hs indicated GM primary quution before the Canmisaian was under what circumetancee Choy feel that perking in front yards is accep[able. Commioionat Valletie felt the exirting otdinancs should be kept as is for safety and aestfietic reasons. she thought the ordinance only requires proper storage and eha felt people make a conscious decision on where to live. she thought that those who wish to perk RVe on their lore should purchase lots with proper AV storage available. Commluioner Chitisa felt that awthet Lcs au sxtzsmrly importanC to the City. she said she recognized the needs of thow people who own RVs and she Planning Commission Hinutee ~. Hay 22, 1991 iOg $~ 14 CRAFT FOR CISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLv thought front yard parking could perhaps be permltGd a cartrin dlatance from sidewalks with a cerGln amount of acrunLnq. SM was not aura she agreed with the comments of the Public Safety Commioion operating self-contained vehLclee from other forma of AVa. Notion: Moved by valletta to reconawnd retention of the existing ordinance. Conmieeioner Tolatoy naked if iha other Conoiseionera would be willing to pursue a parmitt ing grocess. Chairman McNiel felt ouch a provision would be acceptable, but it should ba rather restrictive In terms of where an AV could be stored. _cr ~.~s .,.:.;iwr cnougnc tnat keeping of an Rv in the front yard ahouid be aubject•to reasonable rules and he felt the Lmpaet on the neighborhood should not be overwhelming. CommieLLoner ToLtoy felt the idea any have max it and should be Lnveetigated. Ha orated ha was in favor of Lifting Chs anratorium and would like to have staff reasarcA how a permit proceaa could be implemented. Brad Boller, Clty Planner, auggoted that the matter be forwarded to the Clty council with a separate action being [akan regarding the suggestion that the City Council consider aatablishmant of a permit proceaa. Ha asid that Lf City Couneil determined a permit proceaa should W purauad, the Council could rater the matter back to staff and the Planning Commlaaion. Commiaetoner Tol etoy ocondad CwnmLaionsr Vallette'e motion recosasending retention of the existing ordinance. Notion failed on a 2-3 vote (Chitiaa, McNieL, Melcher - noaa). Notion: Hoved by Melcher to continue the item to permit staff to explore the option of eetabliahinq a permitting proceaa. Commissioner Tolatoy stated that the Comoission needed tc advise the Couneil regarding the current ordinance. Comaleaioner Halehsr atetnd that the subject had been under study fox Mora than one year and he thought !t could be delayed until the new concept of permit issuance had been further studied. Commissioner chitiea seconded Commissioner Helehar'a motion to continue the item. Notion failed on a 2-3 vote (McNiel, Tolatoy, Valletta - noes). Chairman McNiel felt the item should be forwarded to City Council. He said he agreed with the current ordinance in virtually every element, but he felt e relaxation of Che time limits might be appropriate. Commissioner Chitiaa asked if the other Comnioionere would recommend five or Bevan days se the maximum. Planning Commission Mlnutee ~" Mey Z2, 1991 log ~•~rj p~ DRAFT FOP, yISCUSSION PURPCIS FS ONL " Commluionu Tolatoy felt that five days would W utisfac[ory. Commissioner Malchsr augquied wven days. Ha said he would only support the racnmmandation if Lt was recommendrd that City Council defer reinet itutlon of enforcement until the permitting process had bean examined. ~' coarlseioner Chltlea 61t that the permitting proem should not ba a separate issue, but should 6e included in the motion. Motion: Moved by MCNiel, seconded by Tolatoy to zacanmand retention of the existing ordinance with an extension of the time 11miC to five Jaya and a auggeetion that the City Luriher investigate the poeibillty of lnatitutlnq a permitting proceu. Notion felled on a Z-3 vote (Chilies, Helchar, Valletta - Commiuioner Va11etN stated she felt Z6 hours wu adequate Liar to load all RV in prepnrat ion for a Grip. she thought fLve days would add to the enforcement problem. Hr. Eroutil suggaKed two upsrate motions and Lndieaiad that the Public Safety coarissicn had forwarded two npuaU motions. Motion: Moved by Vallatte to reco®end reaction of the exUtinq ordinance with a euggssClon that the City Council consider an option to relax the time limit to five days and to support the Public safety CosmUslon recoamendetione. Motion failed for lack o[ a second. Moticn: Havad by Chitiea secandad by Valletie, to (1) raconernd retention of the existing ordinance with relaxation of the time limit to five days and (Y( a euggeation thst if the Council fall modifications wre desired, additional flexibilliy be considered under t permitting procua with approptiaG criteria to be developsd. Notion carried unanimously by the following vote: AYES: COlO/i SS IONBkSt CHITIEA, MCNIEL, lgLCHER, TOLSTOY, VaLLETT6 NOES: COMMISSIONBRS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONB -carries conmiuioner Vallatte naked if the anfomeent moratorium should De lifted while the criteria wre being edablishad in order to alleviate potetisl safety problems a shown in the picture presented earlier. Mr. ysoutll auggeeted that as the Council had made the deGxmination to suspend anforceent, the Co®Laeion may wish to leave sash a dac Lelon tc the Council. He stated Uat safaiy violations continw to b enforced. • • ~ • . Planning Commission Hlnutaa ~ Hsy 2Z, 1991 Lla ~+' ~ (o rl'iY vF A~ivrH~ -lirAYinNG STAFF REPORT -. DATE: Deceaber 4, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Public Safety Canmission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner Paul Raugeau, Traffic Engineer oi: uii~ nrou cii, uepucy icy runner SUBJECT: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE RECOMAENOAT[ON: It is recamnended that the Public Safety Caammission cons er s report along with any public testimony and provide staff with appropriate direction. The options available include: 1. No modifications to the Recreational Yehicle Ordinance, or 2, Modifications, as outlined in the report, or "s, My other option the Commission may consider appropriate. BACKGROUND: At the last Publfc Safety CcamissTon meeting dealing with recrea ono vehicle parking, staff presented a range of safety-related issues. These included sight line concerns, slope conditions, and concerns with safety, stability, and security of these vehicles when stored in front yards. In addition, disaster preparedness and maintenance issues were also discussed. The CamnTsston provided staff with initial direction, and also reQuested additional tnfonaation. Staff was asked to bring back the folla+ing: 1. OTscussian of appropriate time limits for parking on private property. 2. Breakdown of recreational vehicles by category with a description of potential hazards associated with each type. 3. A definition for a "secured, self-contained" recreational vehicle. 4. Discussion of maximum slope conditions on which recreational vehicles may be safely stored. 5. My inconsistencies in parking regulations affecting public streets. /~ 1 PUBLIC SAFETY COI~tI ON STAFF REPORT a.ECagpT[ONAL VEHICLE STORAGE December 4, i99G Page 2 ' This report contains the requested infonnati on. in addition, Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes of the May 25, 1988 meeting are aiso attached. TIME LIMITS: Existing regulations dealing with ALL vehicles root ,just s s roguish between "storage," which is consT dered permanent, and "parking,' which is considered to be of a temporary, non-continuous nature. Current regul attons prohibit all "storage" in rest denti al front yard areas; NU VenlCl eS lur uiiie,' iLrnu ou Gi ub - '~`°` T.dt_ri al! ot~ 1 ..y-,. ~,..~...., _ may be permanently stored in front yards. Passenger vehicles are considered "stored" after five (51 consecutive days of continuous parking. Recreational vehicle regulations are currently more restrictive: RV's are considered "stored" after only 24 hours of continuous parking. One of the reasons for the five-day limit on passenger vehicles Ts that vehicles which are more or less in continuous use are by necessity in operating condition and are reasonably well maintained. Also, vehicles that are moved often cannot accumulate debris around and under them. By contrast, vehicles which are permanently stored do not necessitate continuous maintenance; dust and debris easily accumulate, weeds and leaves become more difficult to control, and it requires a conscientious effort by the owner to maintain the vehicle and its immediate surroundings in adequate condition. In staff's experience, a large proportion of vehicles currently stored in violation of the five-day limit are also a maintenance problem. The time limit provides a tangible and enforceable tool to deal with passenger vehicle maintenance problems. Similar considerations apply to other vehicles, including RV's. However, from a maintenance perspective, there 1s no advantage Tn keeping the RY regulations more restrictive than reg~•1atlons for other vehicles. Staff could support modifications to the existing ordinance to eliminate the distinction between RY's and other vehicles, and apply a five-day parking limit to both. The net result would 6e that recreational vehicles would not be tonsTdered "stored" until after five days of continuous parking, and regulations dealing aith "storage" would not kick in until that point. This would dive the RV owners additional flexibility, without impairing the City s ability to sustain a high level of maintenance in its neighborhoods. RELREATtONAL VEHICLES TYPES AND CATEGORIES: The folloaing c ass ca ons represen a ypes o ve c es ca~manly found in residential areas subject to parking restrictions under current City Regulations: 11 ~ Ci ~ PUBLIC SAFETY C01M: i0N STAFF REPORT RECREATIONAL VEHICLt STORAGE DecEmbet 4, i990 Page 3 MOTORHOMES an onversion Chassis Mounted Camper Hau secar - 18-40 feet Converted Bus TRAILERS 4fTTTE7Flat Bed Trailer Special Purpose Trailer Box/Enclosed Trailer ~ampin9/lent Trailer Horse/Stock Trailer House Trailer 12-35 feet Fifth Nheei Trailer TO-40 feet BOATS (TRAILERS) ow oa Open Boat (Trailer) 12-20 feet Sail Boat (Trailer) 10-35 feet Cabin Cruiser (Trailer) I6-35 feet Houseboat (Trailer) 20-35 feet CAMPERS/CAMPER SHELLS mnoun e e orEable) Unmounted Camper Camper (Mounted on Pick-up) MOTORCYCLES/ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES 0 orcyc e r e o ree Legal) A11 Terrain Vehicle (3-wheel, 4-wheel, Hot Street Legal) Moped/Motorized Btcycie (Street Legal) Motorcycle (Street Legal) OFF-ROAD VEHICLES (Not Street Legal) ne ggy Off-road Vehicle (Jeep, Truck, VN, etc.) Off-road Rate Vehicle Road Race Car Based on the Commission's direction, staff has reviewed the full range of recreational vehicle types and potential hazards associated with each vehicle category, as requested: CONCERN (HAZARD) VEHICLE TYPE: * SIGHT LINES/YISIBiLITY all RV's (visibility conflicts) * SLOPE CONCERNS all RV's (runaways, instability) 1~3 G'~ PUBLIC SAFETY COMM: ION STAFF REPORT RECREATIONAL VEN ICLt S70RAr,E ^ecember 1, lgg0 Page 4 * SECURITY (safety fran tampering, etc.) * INSTABILITY (falling off supports) * IMMOB [L ITY (rolling off) " n`wnHfIl6ILLi tQUlYMtNI (propellers, propane, fuel) * ATTRACTIVE NUISANCES (children's play, etc.) boats, tent trailers camper shells boats, trailers, tamper shells, aff-road vehicles on or off trailers boats, trailers, campers, off-road vehicles boats, tent trailers, motorcycles, aff-road vehicles boats, trailers, motorcycles off-road vehicles, camper shells * MAINTENANCE all vehicles Although there are a large number of recreational vehicle types and categories, the potential hazards associated with each are similar to nature. For the purpose of separating RV's by the potential hazard they may create, there are really only two groups: (1) problems associated with ALL RV's, and (2) problems common to vehicles that are not self- contained and self-propelled and cannot be locked or otherwise easily secured, such as boats, trailers, campers, off-road vehicles and the like. In our previous report, we have already noted that in staff's opinion, there is no practical way to write an ordinance which wou14 adequately address all safety considerations for permanent storage of the unsecured type of vehicles, such as boats and trailers, in the front yards. If it is the Commission's direction the the current ordinance be modified to permit the storage of certain types of RV's in the front ,yards, staff would suggest that only self-propelled, self-contained vehicles that can be locked and fully secured, be permitted 1n front yard areas. These would include all vehicles in the motor home category noted above (i.e., motor homes, house cars, busses) and permanently mounted camper shells on pick-ups. SLOPE CONDITIONS: There Ts a safety concern involving RV's parked on r veways an a maximum slope which should be permitted on such a parking area. It is recommended that only self-propelled vehicles be permitted on driveways, their parking brakes being secure enough to ensure safety. It is still recommended that even for those, wheel stops be considered for slopes more than 10 percent. This would involve only a small percentage of driveways and is reasonable 1n view of the California Vehicle Code provision which permits cities to require blocks or turning the wheel against the curb on streets steeper than 3 ~~y ~ r~ PUBLIC SAFETY COMM' lON STAFF REPORT RECREATIONAL VEN ICLc STORAGE December 4, 1990 Page 5 percent. It is also common to parking lot design to avoid slopes greater than 5 percent. A 30 percent limit provides a fair margin over these accepted limits and recognizes the slopes commonly found on private driveways, CONCLUSION/OPTIONS: If it is the Cammissi on's desire to consider mo ca ons o he existing ordinance, the following options are suggested for consideration. These are based on previous direction and the information presented in this report. i. iunr iimi a eiieciing parking or all retreat) oral vehicles should/should not be relaxed from the current 24 hour Limit to a five-day limit, consistent with regulations for other non- commerctal vehicles. 2. Regulations affecting the storage of certain recreational veht ties in front yard areas should/should not be relaxed, sub,j ect to the following criteria: a. only self-propelled, self-contained, and fully secured vehicles such as motor homes, house cars, and campers mounted on pick-ups mey be stored in the required front yard areas. b, such vehicles may not extend over a public sidewalk or right-of-way line, nor may they be stored within 10 feet from the back of sidewalk or right-of-way line. c. Vehicles stored in the front yard may not be located within 5 feet of the residence, garage, or other structures. d. No vehicles may be stored on slopes exceeding 10 percent. Staff is requesting appropriate direction. Resp y r t Bra City Planner 8~~ Paul Rougeau Traffic Engineer BB:PR:OK/,ifs Attachments: Public Safety Commission Staff Report of August 7, 1990 Ordinance 360 Planning Conmissian Staff Report and Minutes of MaY 25 1988 ~ ~ 1 _ List of safety Devices (Submitted by RY Group T" Representatives) 11 S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OAT"e: August 7, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Publie Safety Commission FRDM: Brad Buller, City Planner Russ Maguire, City Engineer SUBJECT: REPORT ON RECREATIONAL YEHI CLE PARKING !N THE CITY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Public Safety Commission consider this report along with public input and direct staff to develop appropriate safety criteria for recreational vehicle parking and storage on private property as appropriate. BACKGROUND: At the June 12, 1990, Public Safety Commission meeting, staff was directed to review various safety aspects associated with the parking and storage of recreational vehicles on private residential properties. This report examines these issues as requested. The information is presented as follows: Sight line/interv is ibility issues Slope conditions Other safety considerations Disaster preparedness implications Maintenance issues SIGHT LINE/INTERYISIBILITY ISSUES: The first safety issue to consider is intervisibility between the driver of a car backing out of a driveway and a pedestrian or bicycle approaching on the sidewalk, or a car approaching on the street. In other words, this is the sight line involved in these cases. In analyzing these sight lines, major concern is not with vehicles approaching on the street because the normal right- of-way setback provides adequate visibility, provided that nothing is parked within the street right-of-way. This should always be the case, because for overall safety, maintenance, and liability no encroachments into the right-of-way should ever be permitted. The most important sight line to consider is that between the driver of the backing vehicle and an approaching bicycle or skateboard on the sidewalk. Even though this type of riding is illegal, safety dictates that the worst case be considered, such as a child on a bike going full soeed. Similar speeds would be involved for skateboarders. Recommended criteria is from Caltra ns research far bike lanes (attached) which calls for approach speeds of at least 16 MPH. For our analysis, a speed of 20 MPH and a slope of over 5 percent was used, resulting in a sight line of G•~ PUBLIC SAFETY COMM35`~ON STAFF REPORT "n'r PA^n KING - C!?y 0 ANCNO CUCAMON GA August 1, 1990 Page 2 150 feet. Considering driver position in a large van or pickup and the vehicle being extremely close to a parked RV, the resulting setback far an RV, or any object, would be 10 feet from the edge of the sidewalk. .~ This distance is consistent with the attached Ordinance from Glendale, Arizona and that used for sight distance at alleys in Upland. Also, it is less than some setbacks used elsewhere. In the absence of a sidewalk, the setback would apply to the right-of-way line because where there are not sidewalks it is sometimes possible to drive bicycles fast ainna unimproved parkways. SLOPE CONDITIONS: A second safely issue involves RV's parked on driveways and the maximum slope which should be permitted on such a parking area. it is recommended that only self-propelled vehicles 6e permitted on driveways, their parking brakes being secure enough to ensure safety. Even far those, wheelstops should be considered for slopes more than 10 percent. This would involve only a small percentage of driveways and is reasonable in view of the California Yeh icle Code provision which permits cities to require blocks or turning the wheel against the curb on streets steeper than 3 percent. It is also common in parking lot design to avoid slopes greater than 5 percent. Thus a 10 percent limit provides a fair margin over these atc epted limits. OTHER SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: The current ordinance prohibits storage of rec rea tiona vehicles in the front yard and street side yard areas for more than twenty-four hours. Other vehicles (such as vans, passenger vehicles, etc.) are limited to five consecutive days of parking. After these timelines, vehicles are considered permanently stored. Another safety consideration is the security and sta611ity of permanently stored vehicles in unsecured front yards. When these vehicles are stored adjacent to pu6lfe sidewalks and right-of-ways, or in other unsecured areas, it is necessary to ensure that these vehicles do not become a hazard or an attractive nutsanc e. The ordinance must in some way guarantee that all recreational vehicles are stored in a safe manner. Brakes or other effective devices must be used to keep unsecured vehicles immobile, and a way has to be found to prevent accidental removal of wheelstops or tampering. Trailer hitches and camper suDPOrts must be secured to keep the vehicles in a stable condition. Mechanical equipment needs to be protected to avoid potential injury. In addition, the ordinance must clearly identify safe and unsafe conditions so that it Can be effectively enforced. The Code Enforcement officer in the field should not be required to make an interpretive judgement whether a violation exists. To be effective, the ordinance must clearly define the limitations. I l l ~ ~ ~' PUBLIC SAFETY COMMIS"ON STAFF REPORT RV PARKING - CITY 0 ANLNO CULAMONGA August 7, 1990 Page 3 Because of the great variety of recreational veh lcle types and on-site conditions, the range of potential conditions is virtually limitless. ~~ In staff's opinion, there is no practical way that an ordinance can be written to ensure that all safety considerations can be addressed without the imposition of some restrictions on all similar vehicles. This is especially true for the unsecured types of vehicles such as trailers or boats. The current ordinance does not distinguish between various types of recreational vehicles; all vehicles in the recreational vehicle category are suo,7 ect to the same nm,tan ons. finis inc woes seer-con ca inea, self-propelled, and fully secured vehicles such as motor hones; as well as unsecured trailers, trailers with boats, various types of campers, and similar vehicles. Should the Commission consider modifications to the existing ordfnance, staff would suggest that the differences between secured, self-contained vehicles and the other types of recreational vehicles be examined. DISASTER PREPAREDNESS IMPLICATIONS: It has been suggested that self- contained retreat ono vehic es, equipped with cooking facilities and stocked with bedding, water, and other necesst ties could be of great benefit in case of a ma,lor emergency or disaster. Assuming the vehicle escaped the disaster and the home did not, its owner could rely on a duplicate set of facilities 7n the immediate post-disaster period. While no tangible method exists to accurately predict how useful a recreational vehicle may be in case of emergency, there are some obvious advantages in having a self-contained motor home stored on site. Nhether these advantages outweigh the problems associated with the storage of motor vehicles in front yards 15 a matter of debate and a question of public policy. In any case, the intent of the existing ordinance is not to prevent the storage of recreational vehicles on-site. Rather, it is to define on- sfte areas where such vehicles may be stored safely and in accordance with other public haalth, safety, and welfare goals. MAINTENANCE ISSUES: Although this is not strictly a public safety issue in its imaediate sense, the tong term general maintenance of all City neighborhoods is clearly a question of public health, safety, and welfare. This includes adequate maintenance of structures, yards, parkways, and items stored in public view, including reerea tional vehicles. The pre-1988 ordinance dealing with RV's relied on vehicle maintenance provisions to promote public health, safety, and welfare goals. Unfortunately, the ordinance was ineffective, in that it was only able 11~ G~7 PUBU C SAFETY COMMI`"-ON STAFF REPORT RV PARKING - CITY 0, .ANCHO CUCAMONGA AUgU it 1, 1390 Page 4 to deal with the mast flagrant violations. The Code Enforcement office received many calls from residents objecting to the parking of ~ recreational vehicles in their neighborhood. Many of the vehicles reported as being in poor condition did not constitute a violation under the ordinance; and, therefore, the City could not force their removal. By necessity, all maintenance requirements tend to be subjective. Items such as flat tires and inoperative, unlicensed vehicles are easy to identify. However, the great majority of maintenance cases are in a marginal condition and subject to interpretation and value judgements WII ILII UU IIVI i1."llu cya i(j. .: `~~ .I ntn+ n• officers in the field) must have~a clear and •easi ly explainable set"of rules to work with to be effective. CONCLUSION: If it is the Commissions' desire to consider modifications to the existing ordinance to permit some recreational vehicle storage in the front yard areas, staff would suggest the following criteria: Vehicles must not extend over a public sidewalk or right-of-way. Vehicles should not be parked within 10 feet from the back of sidewalk or the right-of-way line. Vehicles that are not self-contained and fully secured should not be permitted to be stored in unsecured and unscreened front yards. Definitions should be revised to allow a distinction between self- contained and fully secured vehicles. Time limits affecting length of storage should 6e reconsidered. It may also be appropriate to include language to require devices that prevent wheels from turning to be used on vehicles when parked on slopes greater than 10 percent or any appropriate slope selected by the Commission. Res pe lly su *ted, r Ora 1 er uss Magu City P nner Cit er BB:RM/jfs Attachment: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "0" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Photographs CalTrans Criteria Glendale, Arizona Ordinance Nest Ound ee, Ill inais Ord inante Frenchtown, Michigan Ordinance Current Ordinance No. 360 G ~ 119 ~..y~... -~/~ J RV OAQKlN6 - CNiNo !~ V H7C'KG`1~ ON 17R/~'EL~ ,/US7 /S f.K,C 6F' fli ~' S/.DEr ~'r-K. I~ u EXNlB~T ~ ~ 9 VAN HRKED ant ,DRIYE~ /BLOCK/NG 64Et^/~WSN3/LrTJ. V yrc'KE ON RfVEW /3 t,pCK(NCi 7H'E V/EGJ ~- '/~ BICYCLE DETECTOR LOCATION ANALYSIS Detectors for bicxcles must be placed in a position ~~ on the roadway where bicyclists can be expected to ride. on streets with bike lanes this is really an easy task. The bike lane area can be covered adequately by a quadrupole detector that will sense the presents of any bicycle as long as it is ridden in the lane. The adjacent traffic lane will not respond to this detector as a result of the cut-off characteristics of the quadrupole loop. Detectors in left turn only lanes and on approaches to intersections without bike lanes must ba desiannA «., accommodate *c~h •.`,c `i..ya:in ana motor vehicles of all sizes while avoiding adjacent lane detection. This also 1s easy to accomplish if the bicyclist rides on the detector over the most sensitive area, directly over the loop wires. Placement of bicycle detectors in advance of an intersection is done in at least two (2) ways. The detec- tor is placed in advance of the intersection in the same ~ manner as the vehicle detector is placed. •That"'is,-~tha' di t -- t "~t ' ' ' p,~ ~.~ s ance rom the s op lina is datarminad by 1) approach' e ' d;--'2 ' ti '"ti d i ~ .x ~ sp e ) reac on me an 7) stopp ng distance (sae h" 0 Exhibit-12).-This'is'the msthod'used by Caltrana,`tba`CityY ~ Y~ 'of"Cupertino az~d the County of Santa earbaraand is illus- ' ~, ~~p trated in the Caltrans_design manual. Tha distanca_ of `7 ~ +'V 50 feet is based on an average approach speed for' -bicycles of 26 mph: ,This method is particularly useful on arterial approaches where the phase is usually recalled and vehicles approaching will usually be seeing a green signal. if the general speeds of bicyclists vary from the average speeds used to determine the placement of the detector in the Caltrans manual, then the appro riots distance can be calculated for each approach of an inter- section. Upgrade and downgrade approaches will have sig- nificantly different approach speeds than from level approaches. These are examples where the designer or engi- neer should altar the distance to accommodate slower or faster approach speeds. The age and physical condition of the majority of bicyclists using the facility can also alter these parameters. A similar system in use in the City of Cupertino utilizes a detector placed in advance o! the stop 11ne, much like the above example, and another detector placed at the stop line. When the bicycle is detected on the first loop, extension time is provided to hold the signal green until it reaches the second, or loop closest to the stop line. When the detection is made at the second loop, extension time is again provided to be sure that the bicyclist is far enough into the intersection to safely clear before the end of the clearance interval (yellow plus any all-red indication). The particular detector ~~ Exf1/B!T 6/O E:D'.IDZT i2 +am.ea_~e~ma• SVGGESTED DETECTOR DISTANCES FROM STOP LINE }~caa:z.sam:saasvm.~asass=eassa=:m~~sy~ms=amea} ~~ CALTRANS FORMULAS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC SPEED SPEED DEC. TIME DEC. DIST TOTAL TZME TOTAL GIST DIST MPH Ft/SeC SECONDS FEET SECONDS FEET TO USE i i.i .98 5.7 1.98 17.5 20 10.0 14.7 1.22 9.0 2.22 23.6 25 12.0 27.6 1.47 12.9 2.47 30.5 70 14.0 20.5 1.71 17.6 2.71 38.1 40 16.0 23.5 1.96 22.9 2.96 46.4 45 18.0 26.4 2.20 29.0 3.20 55.4 55 20.0 29.7 2.44 35.9 3.44 65.2 65 22.0 32.3 2.69 43.4 3.69 75.6 75 24.0 35.2 2.93 51.6 3.97 86.8 85 26.0 78.1 3.18 60.6 4.18 98.7 95 28.0 41.1 3.42 70.7 4.42 111.3 110 30.0 44.0 3.67 80.7 4.67 124.7 125 35.0 51.3 4.28 109.8 5.28 161.1 160 40.0 58.7 4.89 147.4 5.69 202.1 200 45.0 66.0 5.50 181.5 6.50 247.5 250 50.0 77.3 6.11 224.1 7.11 297.4 300 55.0 80.7 6.72 271.1 7.72 351.8 350 .....1.........~~~............L...........4 .............i...........i........ DESIGN STOPP.SNG SIGHT DISTANCES FOR BICYCLES DESIGN SPEED FEET @ 0} FEET @ 5} FEET @ 30} FEET @ 15i 10 MPH 50 50 60 70 15 MPH 85 90 100 130 20 MPH 130 140 160 200 25 MPH 175 200 230 300 30 MPH 230 260 310 400 EX///ei T .Q2~ G•01 s.. O O Ck. f6 C .~ 'C 0 I ps ;~~ ~~. ~~ t, ..Ilea eali• Vehidr. ,\ cehrudar ype ul awl for q' r Icel ur le.+ w lengtlr auJ ~ixhi iSi kcl w ivs. . +viaiJ r, priwariiy +iraiGrkvi as a rrn qa n:,., rtrn!g q!u!!cr•. !!r! r:, ._. cangriug, ar Uavcl oar, whidr rilhrrr 111 unu.uua ila mvn nunlse Puwrr as in Ihv exo r~rl uwrur hw rtes, wini•n unur lunucs. or rcuearioual v.rua: 1=1 i+ drao n by anolhvr vchia le os in the agar of vavcl Imilcrs. ta•nl uailcn, aauqu•r vaJen. or o•an•nrall uu boar uailcrs, ur (J) is nennua•J un another vehicle as ill the case ul Inuk a.vnpers." SGCTIUN 2. Thm Chapo•r IgA. Anidc I. SvU iou I riA~a is ,vucnJeJ lu n•ad as lullosw: "Nu penuu ]hall uu upy any nurbile huuu• w the City esu~pl iu a nurhde haute pallor awhile hwne fubdis•ifiun. and uo pa•ISUU shall uaaupp arq• recrealionul vehia la• in Ihr Ciry Cxmpl iu a nurbilc hwne park. Nu pesos dwll park any nudrilc hwne on any lul ur parcel of land svliiah is tiuialed uulsidr of mr appna•rJ mobile hurtle park or mobile hwne subdivifion. Itcu caliumJ vchia lrs lua)• ln• palkrd ur sorted uu any Inl ur port el of IanJ subject lu Iha• provisium of Sca]iun g2, Ania lc %%V. AppcnJix A ul the GlrnJale L'iiy Code, pruviJcJ Ihol nu living quanrrs shall be maimaiocJ or any busiueft canieJ on in arch rttrealiunal vehicle while the smue is w parkcJ or suncJ." SECTION 3. Thal Appa•udix A. Aside XXV. Srclion 62 lal lH• anunJeJ lu resat ,., r.. n,....,.. (al For the purpose of Ihis snide. mr "oll-sneer parking space" shall nova an arav in IIIC fP411 of •l ra'CWlrgla• Irreaf lrfirrg IIU left 111111 n•Ir Iea'1 Iq' bvellly Icel. a'xcl'Irl alUIIbIC aallmn5 lrr garage] sh. II lK nu1 Iras Than cighna•n reel by nvemy Ircl exclusive of drivas ur aisles giving access Iherela, anJ each such space shall be accessible Inun sueans or alleys, or private Driveways ur aisles Icadiug W 16e from yarJ. SIiCI'IUN 4. Thal AppcnJis A, Mlidr %X V, Section g? be anrwula•J by adding new paragraphs 111. furl anJ Iu1 of lullows: "(U Any vchia•Ie which is uol olha•rwitc pnrhibilcJ by the provisions ul' Ihis UlJinancc ham bciug parkcJ in the Innu yard ul a siugic•Imuily or Iwo-family nsidcucc Ioi may he IwrkcJ in that Irum yarJ pnrviJCJ Jml such vchichs uc parkad on mt inpmwcJ Jrivcway ur ulxw mr ingmrvcJ parking surlacc. anJ pruviJcJ Thal Iilc total width of the parking area Jlres uw extteJ cidrer thirty pUl feel or lihy perccm ISU%1 of the lot wiJlh as measured m the Inwl Yard sedesk, srhidrevcr is Icvs. Par the purpose u(Ihis Sacliou, iuymwttl Jrivcway or iuquuveJ parking surfan shall consist of coucn•IC, agshah. ail cake, crushed suuu•, paving bricks, or such mbar inyrruvenuvus as may be appnrvcJ by the Uircclor of Ylanniug which waulJ render the parking wr(ace adlicicutly Jusl free." "Im) "NO pan of any vchidc Iwrkad in the rrnnt yanl o(a single-family or Iwo family _ usidcntt lul in attonlanar wish the provision of subiwmgraph (1I berm] shall exla•nJ over Ihc- puhlia• tidcwalk, nr>Ira'tn curb where rxr sidewalk exists: rtnr shall msy such vebiale be Irarka•Ja within the area funrrtd by a !cn•kwl by Icn•hxu I IU' x 10') triangle as ntcasund Irum the Iwint. of interscdion of Jre Wck of Jfe siJcwalk, or sln•H tudr where rw siJcwalk cxizu, anJ a siJc- prulrcny line ezlcnJavl w the Wck u( Ilrc siJawalk, or sfnrl turfs where nu siJcwalk exists, when such siJc properly line a wilhio live Isl fml of a Jrivcway or an impmvavl Iwrkiug surface larcaltxl on an aJjaccnt rut.' "(ul Nat nutrc llwn uue 111 uurcgisteu•J or iuolrcrablc motor vehicle shall Le surranl on auy rut ur part'd of rant within auy RasiJcucc Uisuic6 altJ nu such wsraTlislcrcJ ur. inapcrabk vchidc dull be slareJ within llx fmnl yarJ." SECTION S. Thal shoulJ any pnrvi+iun of Ihis Unlinant'c be hdJ invaliJ, such iuvaliJily slwll rwl alfM other provisions which tau lK given dlca without the invalid purvisirur; mtJ to tlds ettJr the provisiuux of Ibis Unliuaucc are dedareJ hr be uverablc. SC-CTIUN 4. WIIERf•AS the inuuarliale ulra•nainn of the provisiuus of Ihis Onliuonec is naccswry (or the prascrvaliun of the public peace, hcahh anJ tala•ly u( Jn' Cily ur GlcnJalc, an emergency is hereby Jcdaral to exist. anJ Ihis Urdinmtcc shall lK in full lirree and dlecl Inns auJ alter its passaga•, aJuplion and approval by the Mayor and Council or the City of GlenJule. mul it ix hereby cxcnyrl Irum Ibc rclcn•uJum prvisions and laws of the gwle of Arizona. I'ASSIiU, AUUI'fEU ANU AI'I'RU\'IiU by the Moyur anJ Clruncil ul the Cily of GlcuJalr. Ataricopa Cuuuty, Arizona, Ihis 2glh day of Juue, IYNJ. George Renucr Al'f BST: AI'i'ItU\'L•U A5 TU FURM: RIiV IIi\vrlr If y'. Atayur Lavcnm IA•bm w'illiam p. Farrell .rubs Al.dii~u Ciq• Clrrk Cily Alluma'y City M1lmuc. r ~~3 exfwe~r c/y b. Tcmt+ur: LuaJiu nl'arkinc'. Iiuetc. vuJcn. auJ nr nun vchislcs chap Lc pcnnilu ., a Icngmranly puked in the (runs dri ay u( auy residence for up w as haute wi:!:ia any 1 i Joy pcd„I ;o o;cnu!olodato luodingnndnadiug upetatim K. om~ul4uwtl g1KUa, deal IiWUR IClb+itln6nmeU.lme wm k. c. InJuur timm •e: A heal, uailar or tvu cation rehisle moy Le cooed induun ~T, pnwi c 1 mt 1 tc rc:iJcnsc nwiutuins Bvu nif•sucel parkin!: xpaces as rcyuin•J. (S7 2. Number of Vehicles: Nu more than I boaVUailer conthinmiun and I mcrealiuu O vehicle may lw saved un auy one reciJemial lui. Kayaks. canoes. mtJ nnvla+als Vs shall nut be nnssiJcn•J a haul lur purposes of Ihis adaccliuu. y J. Dt,lk and Locution 14•suiniuns-Site auJ hear YarJ: Nn boat, trailer, ur recremiua O vehicle sturcJ io a residential Jisuict shall exceed the !allowing Jinteosimts anJ O lucuiuus: ~ a. Ilciplx: 1 I feet excluding autcunuc. b. Lcugllr 30 Icct, cxcludiug hikh, tongue, anJ other a(+pendapes. c. WiJdc 8 Icd cxcludiug ulachcd IrorJwurc. '>` J. Rear YaN: closer aeon 3 (as: t:..:~.:!:: •••'• ;•••gvnv line. e. Side YuJ: closer than 7 Ittl tram 16e site pnslseny line. 4. Bulk auJ 4Katiun Re>uictiuns-frnw YarJ: No Bual. (railer. Bavcl trailer, ur camping trailer shall • alloweJ wuhin any trout YarJ except as otherwise pmvideJ in Section Clh Tcupanary Luudiull Parking. No nmuuiaa•J ntiveasional vehicle shall Be suttad in a front )mrJ cscepl tar a driveway which noels aJolxeJ Jrivcway smnJards msJ shall not cxcceJ the following Jhnensiuns anJ Itxatiun: a. Naigltl: 7 Ice! excluding antennae. b. Length: 2U feet c. WiJth: a Icct .--.Y d. Set Back: l5 fm [rom lht puWk right of ways Sediun 2; Thal auy anJ all orJinances, nssdutions, anJ orJcrs, ur pans thereof, iu conllin with Ute pruvisiwss ut this Ordinance. arc to the extern u( such conllict rcpealad. SecJnn S: That it any section, subdivisias, semcnce or phrase o(Ihis Ordinance is tut any rcawn hell w Bc voiJ, invaliJ, ur uncunsliwtiunah such Jttisims slsall not c(lisd the valiJhy of dte rcenaining Iwrtiuns of this Ordinance. Sectitm 4•. Thal this Ordinance shall Le in full force auJ ef(m Imm anJ alter its passage soil approval as proviJed By law, anJ abet puhlicatiuo in pamphlsa toms pursuant to Jtc audwrity of the PrcsiJcnt arnl BwrJ of Truuecs. Passa•J by the BtwrJ of Trusters of the V(Ilage of Wsst Dander. Kuse County. Illiuuis, soil appruvcJ By President oI ssiJ Village this Slh Jay of Uttanher, IY87. AYES: 6 NAYES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Thomas R. Watncr Viilagc Ptcsirkrt4 V(IW(tc of West OunJee, Kmse County, tl. ATTEST: Morgue! Jcf(irwn Village Cicrk by Isurbaru Ilaincs Oeputy Clerk i~~ 30 Fx>wa~r es~ t'S three other resiJcnts a vJy the problem anJ plc,cw their ' •as lur J xrlunuu that wool) be acceptable to the cunu....nity. After nsecting anwng Ibcnssa .>, the ucwly-InrnteJ cU.:unittec thc!t Inc! ;^,ilh ;hc t'lauuiug Cumwi,vnn. Hy Iltcn, it svn i.iarcir R. 195,1. Bulls sites nmde cuua•+siuus Uwt they tch sertc n•a,uunblc. The Plauuiug Cununis,iuu agrccJ tv ailuwiug RV parking iu Jrivcways, but it nas puina•J um Uwl this would Murk aacu tU most garages ant carports. After nacre meetings and Discussions, it was Jetenuined that parking inuncJiatdy tU the site of ant adjacent lu the driveway would be pennitleJ un a parking pat with a miuinwm of six indscs of rumpnrtrJ 21-A gravel ur the cyuivaf•nt. All >,+ parties agrccJ lu this cUnlpnnnise. -~ After the ncccssary readings at Couunissiun meetings, the proposal was sent w the Tuwn- .3 ship Boar) where it was approvcD by a unauinwus vote. L1s It took ten months ant pcrsevcrancc Un the part of the RVcrs, but it was a guuJ exansplc ~, u! what can 6e accvmplisheJ. From a snsall voice ... dsm of the Grabiues ... came a major tO revision in an urJiuance that hat been un the books lur n«ve than a decade. HaJ this approach not been successful the cunuuittee was prepare) qs uu thrnu+~h n+~ nemssnry ~rn~,.,±~~•~~ ;~ p;;; ;, ;rfe,e,ruum Un use Uallut and take their tight tU the voters. ~} Fortunately, this was not ncccssary. ~ Throughout the negotiations, the ntectings aurarteJ extensive press coverage, helping the t 0 RV committee iu enlisting the assistance of others in the cununwlity. ,7 Charter To+vnship of Frenchtown Ordlnantt No. 100 The Charter Towuship Soar) of the Charter Tu+vuslrip of IYCnduown. County of Munroe, arnl Slala' of Michigan, orJains: To'amcnJ the text of tlsc Frcnchtown Ghancr Township Zoning OrJinmxc No. IUU as follows: Amend OrJinance No. 100 Scaiun 4.05 Paragraph (d to rcaJ as follows: Ftecrcatiun vchidcs where parkcJ nr store) may be locale) in thr front, rear or one side yarJ separately or in the fallowing combination; from yarJ ant one siJr yarJ, rear yarJ ant one side yarJ. In no case shall recreation vchidcs be parkcJ or save) in ttsc irons, rear and one side yarJ in combination. In the case of a side yarJ ncrcatims vchidcs nmy be parkcJ or ssurcd in only one such yarJ, that being the side yarJ doses( ur inunadiatdy adjacent m the main driveway. When rarrcmiun vchidcs arc parkcJ Or stead in Ihr rear yarJ or Ihr side yard, the IoraJUn of all such vchidcs shall csndorm w the minimum yarJ slwee requirrntrnss for accessory builJings in thr zoning Jis«id where brcaleJ pruviJa•J, however sail reacatiun vchidcs may Lc locate) duscr w the primary bnilJing than ten 1111) 4•cti. When recreation vchidcs arc parkcJ a stored in tAe (runt yarJ the Irxatlun of all such vrlrides dhall nut be closer than twentyatu 121) lea from the eJgc o(thc traveled rwJwaY artd shall be restridcd only ta., the driveway porUOn of the from yard or a designate) recreation vehicle parking or storage area immedia[ely adjuen[ ro and having direct access to the Driveway. In the case of a Jasipnaad parking or storage area bcateJ in the front yarJ, sail area shall as a minimum be cons«ucteJ of a six (6) inch depth of eompaneJ 21A gravel srr cyuivalcnt approvcJ by the builJing inspector. For the purpose of thb section of the orJinance a Driveway shall mean the pave) ur unyavcJ strip of land IcaJing dirccsly from the vavdeJ nwJway to the garage or residence. Sail area shall rsot exceed beyonJ one 11) tout on either siJr of Usc existing garage. Where a garage is nut IucmeJ on the site, a JNvcway nsay nut Ire grcmer than 21 Icrt in wiJlh. Circular Drives or sindlar facilities shall nut br cunsiJea•J Iwn of the Driveway or a Designate) rccremian vehicle parking or storage area fur the pugxssc of This section u(Ihc urJinance. On a lake luh all of the alnwe requirrments shall apply except Ihat a vchide so stored on the lake site slmll be set back ovemy 12U1 feet from the lake lot line. When rffMive: This OrJinancr shall brnnne dfedivc IhirtY 130) Jays a«rr linal passage mW publication in the Monnre Evening News. a newspaper having general dreulauuu m Frauhmwn Charter Township, Mmvsx Count'. Michigan. Frenduown Clwrtcr Towuship UuarJ By: UcrnmJ 1. FdJcr AudwmicareJ: Frcniluuwn Chancy Township 0t': Nolnrt J. Norwood Suixrviwr Munroe County, Michigan ~ ~-~ July 3, 19g4 aN/BiT E r /a~ 34 Public Safety Commies ion Minutes -10- ~ 7 l`_f' Oacember :, 199;; ah concurred Chat it moss very diE£icult co toms out o[ the school and cry and moats fot pednatrLans walking in front of the eehool and eroea>.ng the driveways; coca a ou pull out you era right on top o! the crosswalk where pedest riane are trying t cross with no help whatsoever; and trying to get up to the speed of„ 45 mph or re with the ears going north on that street. Therefore, would like Co see '. th a could ba more enforeemsnt out there to watch the speed and give citations to a offender' while Mr. Aougsau Se looking into the other issues. Comm iesioner Amod concurred with Commies Toner west and hie main concern was the Nr. Rougnau stated he mould likn to as the Commission, regarding the concept of enforcing Ghn ^ehool zone and also checking the spends during eehool pedestrian hours, thst he be able to coordi N with thn Police on this so thae staff can got acme valid aadings before a alvn entorenmsnt •tarU. MOTION: Moved by Boyd, seconded by amodt to ap ova Rama 1, 2 and 3 on the Staff Report except that Item 3 will ba amended t read "Invent igat ion by the Engineering ^iviaion of any additional requut• by • school. aLO, that an investigation be made with the nchaol into moving o -stmt parking/student loading", to appcova and direct the installation of It • 2, 3 and 5 in the echool~a recommendations, specifically Lo 'install ach 1 symbol sign for northbound traffic on Cernnlian Strnet jfly7J1 of Lomita Orivs or wherever it is legally aporopriate), Co repaint yellow crosswalk and paint th approve iegende on the roadway, and to post the approved school Z9 mph signing ae authorized by law, to direoi that thona matGrn occur and rnfar to staff foe vutigat ion Ib6a1e 1 and 4 0[ the school • ragout, plan the additional Tower th have been rained. Motion csrriad unanimously 6-0-3 (Clara). speed traveled in t erne Commnse>oner Quintana equeeted that Mr. Rougeau consider and inc lutle the visibility factors of t nhoovine center with the drivew.o a.,:«:.,,. ...,« Carnelian, the proximity o the alley way and how the! a[feets dcivere entering or exiting. Sha reltaratad of only era thorn pedestrians bui thorn ate higC school students driving to al Loma High School and when thorn tnnnagere are making a loft-turn onto Base Lin oaa or driving down Cernnlian thny do not have the best tract record !or being ea Sous, and coordlnaL tMu factors whnn the next traffic study is 6ninq conduct so that this may W considered aloe. Chairman Boyd stated thL metier will also De calsndarsd for the January, 991, requlu CossLLuiw emoting in order to take up eha suttees that wars coot ed on this itr and uy other Items that may coma up. F6. Aarott on Asorgtlo >•1 WhLOla IA y 1 p ki i tM Ci (COaliaund from movnmbnr B, 1990) Staff report presented by OCto 9:routil, Oeputy Clty Planner. Chairman Boyd opened the meeting Lor public Muinq. addrusinq the Commie Ian was: Ron zelbarth, 960] G Colina Orive, rsitaratad his position as previously stated at the august 7, 1990, Commiuion muting wham he apptovad of allowing ruidant• to store their r. v.'s, travel trailer/house car, boat •, I2~v G. /5 Public raHty commluion Minute -11- December C, 1990 on their property with the proposed guidelines. He reterretl to Pags CO, Item Ib, velure It states ^such vehicle may not extend over a public sidwalk or right-ofway llne..,•, that he felt the people in the rural eras without sidwalks are being panelized an extra 10 lest so he asked' the Coa~iseian eo conelder Ghat, in Che abunce of a sidewalk, that the parklnq limit M 30 feet behind the curb! inc. In closing, he askw the Cammiaaion to conelder breading the parking availability on residents property to qo i»yond what le listed in the staff report. There being no further public response, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Boyd asked the Commiuion if they bit there wu • nwd at this time .., -,,,.,.v ~... w<wnc wcoinence rsgasc a,y tote lees. After name dlacuuion tM Cowaiuion concurred to cake eM follwinq motion/ recosmendat lone to the City Council: NOTION: Moved by quintana, second Curatalo to recaumsnd to eM Ciiy Council on the lees of tM r.v. referral that after rnnaideration of the widace ptuated and other conaiderationa the Public Safety Cos~lulm [iMa that !here L no parllwlat public ufety rueon to modify the current existing ordinance. Notion carried unaimously 6-0-1 (Clue abpnt). MOTIONt Moved by tankovleh, seconded Dy Curatalo that it !or come reawn the City Council determines that a modllicat ion of the currwt Ordinate is appropriate tM PuDlie Safety Commiuion recommends tM following factors be considered in modllyinq weh OrdinaeeT spetiilcally Itws 1 ad 2 and paragraphs a through d inclusive on the staff report dated December e, 1990: 1. Time limits atiwtlnq parklnq of all rwreational whieln eheo3dt should not W seluw Isom tM current 4C hour limit to ^ flue-day limit, consLsLnt with regulations for otlur wn-eosnerelel vehicles. 2. If tM requlatiou attectl:q the storage of certain recreational vehielu in tron! yard areas ue M relued, tM follwinq criteria should D• used: a. Oely salt-propelled, elf-contained, and fully ueursd vehicles ' emL r motor bore; hmu cars, and campers ariuntsd on piek- aps rq be atozad i4 tM required front yard arse. b. such eehielee nay not ertend over • public ridwalk or r19ht- . et-wy lir, nor may they W stored within 10 feet true the bwk of aidwalk oz right-o[wap 1LU. c. Vehlelee atosd in tM front yard may cot G !mated within S trt of tM nsidenee, garage, or other ettuetures. d. ao vebiclss may W stored on elopes eseeedlnq 10 peresnt.^ Motion carried h2-1 (Quintana ind Nest opposed, and alas abeeheJ. . . ~a~ G ~l(o carry ur iia~~((;xu c;u(;a,~iu,~;tia STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 To: Mayor and Members of the Clty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner HY: Anna-Liao Hernandez, Assistant Planner SVBJECT: ENVIRONMHNTAL ASSESSMHHT AND INDUSTRIAL 3PEC IP IC PLAN AM~IONBtff 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A regueat to amend the Industrial Area Specific Plan to modify the Extensive Impact Commercial Use and to add the Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Use and its r¢lated development criteria within the Specific Plan area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 1DATIOA The Planning Commission recommends approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 91-03. HACtGR0011D The Planning Division has been approached by several companies interested in eatabliehing swap meet facilities within the Industrial area. Svap Meets are currently listed ae a typical use under the "Extensive Impact Commercial" category, which is only allowed within the Raavy Industrial Zone, Subarea 15 (see attached Exhibit "A"). This Amendment would create a new land use category "Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial" to address market trends towards diemunt malls and indoor swap meets. In addition, this Amendment would establish specific development cziteria identified within the Industrial Specific Plan. The proposed land use definition Ss: Indoor Imolemale/metail Ca~ercial Activittee typically include, but are not limited to: retail, wholesale, or discount Bales. These types of businesses exclusively inw lve multiple venaora selling new goods in separate, pezmanent display structures. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: discount outlets and indoor swap meets. Originally, the following distinct land use category was proposed for outdoor swap meets: 8wep Meet (Oatdoor) Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail, wholesale, discount salsa, or trade of new or used goods within an outdoor area by multiple vendors. Such activities may be operated year-round on a temporary basis, such as CITY COUNCIL STAFP REPORT IfiPA 97-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CnCA90NG.? JUrte f9, 1991 , Page 2 on weakenas, or may be a special event. Uaee typicnl ly include, ,.. .. but are not limited to: swap meets, flea markets, and outdoor auctions. However, in the Commission's review of the two proposed land uses, a deiermination was made Chat outdoor awep meets were inappropriate within the City's Industrial Area• The Commission directed staff to revise the taut of the Amendment to prohibit outdoor swap meets within the industrial area based upon the problems experienced In other comaunitiesr including traffic imnaetm. e,f!-a~.e :^~~._-_; _~--,,,;, property maintenance, aesthetics, sad security. QPINOIgYMN, ae~ Staff has found no significant impacts on the environment ae a result of this proposed text amendment. The Planning Commission rernmende issuance of a Negative Declaration. PY.Te P1R P11NIN.B The proposed Amendment is eoneiatent rith the Industrial Specific Plan and the General Plan. The project will not ha detrimental to adjacent properties or cause algnifieant advaree environmental impacts. CONasSP'OIA>Y(3 This item hoe been advertised Sn the Inland Va11eY Daily Bulletin newspaper ae a public. heerinq. Beep y su ed, ~ ~ Brad ler ,/ Cit Planner BB:ALH: mlg Attachments: Hxhibit "A" - Staff Report oY Nay S, 1991 Exhibit 'B" - pissing Comieelon Resolution 91-39 Exhibit "C" - staff Report of April 24, 1991 Exhibit "D^ - Planning Comiseion Ninutea of April 24,1991 Exhibit "E° - Staff Report of January 9, 1991 axhlbit "P" - Planning Commission Minutes of January 9, 1991 Exhi6lt "G• - Planning Co®iasion Minutes of May 8, 1991 Ordinance I~q i:ITY" uF ktA.~'ti;HU i;"1;:1hff;hl;A STAFF REPORT DATE: May E, 1991 TO: Chairman and Membett O! the Plannlnq Commie ion FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner By: Anna-Liu Aernandes, Assistant Planner SUBJECTS ENVIAONMLwTIIt A58E66lRMT AMn IMOVETRIAI. gpECIFZC P.aw AMENDMEMT 91-03 - CITY OP AAMCMO CUCAMOIINA - A tequeet to amend tM Induelriel Area epecitie Plan by ndding swap mast and rxtmeiw impact comrrcial ire ud their development eritsria wlehln the Speeitic Plan area. Self recommends Lsuanw of a Negative Oecluation. (Continued from April 24, 1991.1 EACECROUND AND ANALYSIS: On Aptil 24, 1991, the Planning Commies ion reviewed Industrial Area eprelilc plan Amendment 91-03 and directed etxlf io modify the text of the amendment on tM follovinq itsuee: A. O9edoor Swao Meet Vus Swap Meets are Listed in tM Industrial Area Speeltie Plan u a typical uo under the 6zbnsive Impact Commercial category. The Plannlnq Cco®luicn dlzecbd stoat to prohibLt outdoor swap meets within the industrial area based upon the pro63ems rxperienesd Ln other eomsuniiios inclualnq traffic impacts, o!t-site parking impacts, property maintenance, aeethetles, and security. staff mould recommend modifying thi• detinitlon of txtsnsivr Impact Comrrcial Co delete any reference to flea urkets, outdoor auction tales, Or swap meet acelvitiu. S. Parkinm Originally staff recommended a parking ratio of 1 parking space per 150 squire feet. The Planning ComaLaion felt that 1 tpace prr 100 square feet wu more appropriate buod upon the experience of the city o[ Santa Ana. Sta[i hoe •Lnee revied the Ordinance of approval to require 1 parking space par 100 square fat Ise attached oedlnaneel. c. EnurtainTent Perm+t• My type of ancilLry enbrtaiswent in uwciaii0n with the uo shall W eubjett to thou conditions a• identified wlthln the 6nGrtainMn[ Ordinuee. Entertainment, at defined by the Entertainment Ordinance, will continue to be tubjeet to thoe regulations. Othet forme o! amusement, moth a• •ELddle" ride, would be requlsted through the Conditional vu Permit proceu. ~+ f ... PLANNING COItlU SSIO. 3TApp REPORT NO. 28PA 91-03 - CITY Ol RN7CN0 CVCAMONOq Nay 8, :99i Pages Z O. soda BnforeamanW TM Coamiuion tapaasad concern with tM potential wet to the City for axLraosdinary invotigatlon to ownitor and ratpo'W to problau (a.q. traffic, parAlnq, atcurity, atn.) iMC may occur u a rtault of indoor wholuaL/rttail uu. stet! is continuing to Snvaatlgatt, with Lht Clty Attornty'^ office, the variwa ctqulatory archaniaatt (i.a., lletnainq) that ay tnabla tM City to zaeovtr tMu coats. each a rtqulatory provlaion mould rtquixt aeiion by the City Council. ... "'ca.w.:.:,i.++.,.+ acart rtcaaWndt that tM planning Caapiuion rtcaaarnd approval of thin arndaiant and Saauaeet of a Ragatiw Otelarailon by tM Clty Council through adoptioe ~[ CM attaebtd Raaolution. Ate lly Bra s City P tr BB:ALAtap Attachmantt~ Bxhiblt "A• - April 24, 1991 Planning Comiaaion Staff Mpost i4aolution of Approval Ordlnanet ~X~~P~if ~A'=2 131 RESOLUTION NO. 91-39 A RESOLUTION O! THB PLANNING COMMISSION OP THS CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ~ INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AIGSNDMENT 91-03, BSTABLISH ING REGULATIONS POR AN INDOOR WNOLBSAL6/RETAIL COMNHACIAL USE, MODIFYING THS DEFINITION OP S%TSNSIVB IMPACT COMlgACIAL USB, AND NA%ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TNBRSOF. A. AecitaL (1) Tha City o[ Rancho Cucamonga has inltlatad an application for Induatzial Ara SpaeiLlc Plan AandMnt 91-03 a dac8bad Ln the title o! ihla Raaolution. Naralnaftar, in thin Raaolution, the subject Time 8xtension request is referred to as "the application.• (ii) On April 26, and ecntinusd to May 8, 1991, the Planning Commiulon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conductW duly noticed public hearings on the n~plieation and concluded acid heating on that dais. (111) All legal prerpuisites prior to the adoption of thin Raaolution have occurred. R. Reeolut ion. NOW, TIffiRBFORB, it La Aareby found, datetmi ned, end resolved by the Planning Cdomia ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga a followr. 1. This Commission haraby specifically fintle that all of the facie eat forth in the Raeltala, Past A, of thin Raaolution are true and correct. 2. Bnaed upon aubatantial evidanw presanbd to thin Commission, tluring the above-reference! public hearings on April 26, and Ray S, 1991, including written and ozal staff reports, this Cammission hereby specifically finds ae follows: (a) The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study, Part IIj (b) The application applLa to propert iss located within subareas a-11 and 13-15 of the Industrial Ara Specific Plan. (c) The prmposatl amendment would bs in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Cho reasons as Lollowa: 1) That the propowd amendment will tliatinquiah between the Extensive Impact Commercial uaa and the Indoor Wholeeals/Retail COmmercial uaa. i 3z Exh;b~~ ''~y - I PLANNING COlOIIHBION RESOLDTION NO, 91-39 ISPA 91-03 -CITY of PANCNO COCAMONGA May 8, ii9: Page 2 2) That the propaeed amendment will establish a parking eriGria of 1 space par 100 sque feat for Che Indoor WholeeaU/Retail Commercial uu within the Induatxiel hrea 6peeif le elan. 3) That the proposed amendment identifies the addikional ~ wubm!ttal requirements of a Iunagemant Plan and • Trafl Le Study to ensure that surrounding land uwew axw not negatively impacted. 6) That the proposed amendmwnt will psohlbit outdoor wwap meetw Weww of their auociated teathet Lc, traffic, parking, maintenance, and severity impacts. 3. eaee4 upon tM substantial widene+ pre.w...~3 _- ..,~ CaomLSSLOn during the abovrrsfennced public Marinq and upon CM specific findings of facts wet forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, thin Coamiolon hereby finds and concludes as followw~ {a) That the proposed amendafwnt ie conaLGnt with the objwct!vw of the InduwtrLal Area Spwcific Plan, and Lhe pusposee of the D Latrict in which tM siG ie locatwd. (b) That the propoewd amendment will not W dKSlmental to the publio health, ufety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or impsovamwnte in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed amendment iw in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the industrial Area Specific Plan. (d) That the proposed amendment will not W detrimental to the objectival of the General Plan or the Industrial Aria Specific Plan. 6. This Commiaalor. hereby Linda that the projaet haw been reviewed and conwidered in compliances with tM California Rnvironmental quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commiswion hereby recommends iswuence Of a Negative DYClaratiOn. 5. Based upon the findings and concludons set forth in pacagraphs 1, Z, 3, and { above, thaw Commies ion hsraby reeOlvee as followw: (a) That the Planning Cammiwsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hsraby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 91-03 par the attaehe4 ordinance. 6. The Secretary to thaw Commission shall crrtify to the adoption of this Raeolut ion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TMTS STH DAY OF NAY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfiA PLANNING CddlI88ION A680LUTION NO. 91-39 T_aPA 91-07 - CITY G! RANCHO COCANONGA Nay 9, 1991 Page 3 a ~~ - BYs L ry T' Niel, Chairman ~ '' G~/J/~j/!'~ ATT63T:. ` _ ~a: w.: '~+:~Seoz)Cary I, Brnd Bullarr Secretary o! the 4lanninq Camiuion ci the City o[ Rancho Cucamonga, 0o Aereby eaetify that the foregoing Aewlution vaa duly asW regularly intrixluead, pauad, and adopted by the planning CammUaioa of tM city of Haneho Cucamonga, at a regular maetloq of the 4iaminq Coasiaaion Mld on the 8th day of Hay 1991. by ttu tollovinq vote-towits AYHB: COKK288IONHRes CNITZEA, MCNI BL, TOLBTOY, VALLETTE NO85: COMHIeSIONItRSs MELCRER ABBENT: COlMI88IONHRSi NONE ,~~i,_3 -CITY OF RA1iCH0 CliCA3vIONi;n STAFF REPORT },.. ~ DATR: Apzil 36, 1991 ~~ zo: chaizman and Membrra of the Planning Comaiaeion FROM: Brad Huller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lira Hernandea, Aa ri etant Planner >unua~r: aNVI NTAL- A_9686loSNT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY Ot RANCHO CBCAMONGA - A rrqueat to amend Lhe Indurtrial Area eprcific Plan by adding Bwap Meat (Outdoor) and Indcor Nholenle/Mtail Caeaearcial up and their development criteria within the apaeific Plan area. Btatt rrcommendr irruancr of a Negative DrclaraUOn. I. ACTZON REOU66TED: Rrvirw and approval of the land use definitions far outdoor Swao Neat and I doo Nhol Eels/Retail Commercial within various ruDarena of thr Indurtrial Aren Specific Plan (IBP) and associated development criteria. ZI. aHCROAOVND: In recant monttu, the Planning DivLion hee been approached 6y several companies intrrarted in eatabl iehing swap meet fscillt isa within the City. Swap Msetr are currently listed es a typical use under the ^Extensive Impact Commezcial" category, which Lr only allowed within the Neavy Indurtrial zcna, Subarea 15 (See Attachrd Exhibit, •A•). Zn addition to the lack of definition of thr term "awap mart," thrrs wire no specific development criteria identified within the ISP. On .Innuary 9, 1991, the Planning Cammisslon rrvlawed and approved staff's request to initiate a modification to the Induntrial Arra Specific Plan to include proviaionr ana standards for the 'ewsp meet^ uer. The Planning Commiuion aLo directed staff to include the following information within the Amantlaent: A. Clarify the definition of the swap mart use. e. Identify other industrial aubarsas where the uae could be conditionally permitted. c. Establish atsndarda end regulations for the awap meet uae. The following report and propoerd Indurtrial Specific Plan Anendment hee bean prepared for the Planning Commoiasion'a review. ~~~~~~ PLANNING CDMMIBSIG 3TAPP REPORT ?BPS 91-03 - CSTY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA April 24, 1991 , Page 2 III. ANALYBI6f A. Swao lest xiatorv: Traditionally, awap mast Lacil itiu have ~ operated outdoors by the greupinq of • numWr of independent wllaza of both new and used gouda within drivrin theabrs, ball Lielda, and acewaya (i. e. eauqua Bwap Mast, and the Roo Bowl(, such uwa operated periodically, on waelwnda or nuonaily, Dut primarily on wt weskends if the tacilitio were not in normal wee. As tMir popularity has grown, so ton have awap manta wolvsd, changing tM eMracbx o[ •awap maet• [acilit.ies. TM aateac crow: - - c =____ ^" •diaeouni malls' hae appeared in nitres ouch a Carson, Los Mgelo, and Banta Anl. In moat inatanoea, these wes involve Yd¢ptlva re-use' of induatr /al buildings. x. Definition: The •awap MNt• Dse is curxantly listed under tM Extendvs Impact Cwmereial uw within the IBP. EateMive Impact Commercial is define! as the following: •thow which may produce • aubatantial impact upon tM surrounding atw. Uesa typically include but are not limited to amusement parka, drive-in movie tMatsra, flea arlub, outdoor wction idea, ar swao mast activities. ..• TM Lncludon of awap manta, Lisa markets, and outdoor auctions togetMr within the xeavy Industrial subarea o! the City appears to M basal on the traditional vicar of awap fswta as an outdoor use characterised by teelwrary 'portable` vender stalls that operate on wwlunde. xowever, stalf'• opinion L that an a:pandsd definition o! such camsrcisl activity is needed to address indoor operations, Lnaluding Lhow which may M semi-permanent or 1»xmanent inattllatlona. The following nw lend uw type delinitions are aeaeimended: IDrao Neat lOatdaerl: Aetivitiu typically inc:.udq but eta not 13mLtsd Loa the atail, wholesale, dLeovnt ulu, or trade o! new or used gouda within an outdoor area by multiple vendors. such activities may W operated yeat- sound on a twporuy bade, ouch as on wwlunds, or may W a spacial want. Owa typically include, but are net limited to: swap amets, flea marluta, and outdoor auMions. 131, PLaNNINq COgfISSTG 3TAff REPORT ISpA 91-03 - CITY O! MRCRO COCARONOA April 36, 1991 Pogo 3 Sndoae MholasaL/etail Cemmareial, Activities typically inolude, but are limited to+ stall, wholesale, or dieeomt ale. Tluu types o! Gwimoe exclusively involve multipU vendor + piling raw goods in seplraG, pereanent tlLplay structure. osq typically include, but ara not limited to: dieeount autiots and indoor swap meta. Thr first definition, ,gyan Mpta 10utdeerl, addrnws the «-+A~etonal activities and charaehristics o[ tM wa. The econd dofinition, 2nd^_nr angjs.ala:~ fail ~~+w,ercial. addrepea tho aetioities and dasuWa upciated with eM earrginq discount caamercial activity of oonsusrrs. Soth land we axe similar iR Lhat they both attraot a high concentration of people to Ehe siG and may gonaraG similar concerns regarding cireulationr packing, seouriiy, and eintenanco. It is important, however, to rocognlae the two as distinct use, whilr establiohinq eho same eriNCia for both. C. vocation ReauiramenU~ TMra ara a number of customer dynamics eolaasd to thin up. whether hold indoors or outdoor, wch a uaa will attract a high comentration of people to tho •iG based upon obwrvatiow of existing operations. A concern ezprpeed by the Commiulon we ineaeopatibhity with rpidantlal one. The direction of the Planning Cammieion was to explore eM loeaticn of this typo of use within the General Tndwtcial, Minimum Impact Heavy indwtrial, and Ruvy Tneustrisl subuns within tho 8pecil ie Plan. Tha Ospral Industrial category provide for eha widest poniblo Tanga of light and medium industrial type of activity including manufacturing, fabrication, and office usaa. The Minimum impact Reavy Industrlal group is an area intended for hevy industrial use with minimal impacts to the wrtounding are and includes a Tanga of wtivitiea from woodworking facilities to hevy machine shops. finally, the Rpvy Industrial category is intended to aceommodab tho heaviest Lndwtrial esp. Mno Mee! 10utdoorl~ M outdoor swap mast is liluly to have a numhor of aetptie eoncerno rQatad to general appearance, signo, retuu, and eha display of products. Typically, thee was eatae to a more transient vendor, such that displays and goods aro independently arranged. Rec-we of the physical eharaetoristiee o! an outdoor swap most, this up would be more 13'l PLANNING COMMI88T0. iTAlF RBPORT TSPA 93-03 - CISY OF AANCNO CUCAMONGA April 26, 1091 , ?age 4 Industrial and Heavy Industrial areas to mitigate ~ any significant aesthetic effect on the aurroundinq area. Staff recoaaasnds allowing outdoor awap masts Ln Subareas 9 and 15 through the Conditional Uee Permit procees. ;ndeor wholesale AUtail Conmetclal, Necauae all setivitln related to thin type of proposed uw would tab places within an enclosed building, aesthetic considerations are limited to .~~-- a:.,. nron..w; --~a..uenp µ.e., trash). BuCh • uu could bo appropriaU within the Cansral Induatrlal, Minimum Impact Fleavy InduatriQ,~and Naavy lnduatrial arena of the Industrial Area epaclfic Plan, Staft recommends that Chia use be allowed in Subareas 8, 9, 30, 11, 13, 16, and 15 through the Conditional Oee Permit procus. Parkinc Standard, Anotbr concern exprosW by the Coamiulon related to the Suue of parking. Staff surveyed Southern California cities rpardinq the parking raquiremeniY for awap aunt usu. Staff recLLvW a variety o! roponue to the survey. The moat conservative perking etanderd requireamnte ware reported by Pomona, which requiro 6 eta1L par vendor, and Santa Ana, which rpuirsa 1 parking apace per 300 square feat. Los Angelaa has the nest liberal requirement, 1 parking apace per 500 square feat. Munieipalitlee such as Ontario and the City of Lae Angelaa maintained the typical commercial requirement of 1 specs per 200 or 250 square feet for the awap meat uu. In formulat inq the parking etsndard, a numWr of by iseuss wares zecognizW. In cities with oparatinq swap aueb, the largest complaint wan the ahortaga of puking facilities. The Orange County Indoor Swap Meet, located in the City of Sonia Ana, which maintains a parking ratio of 1 space par 100 aquera foot, hu experienced numereus npaLive impacts to surrounding land uses u a result of the shortage of puking facilities. Ialbrinq, littu, and vandalism have also occurred in adjoining lend uue as • result of swap moat clientele parking off-e1U, The awap maeC uaa is very different from a General Commercial or Regional Commercial uses, which maintains a parking requirement of 1 parking apace per 250 and 220 square leaf, respectively. Swap mseb typically operate as wwbnds, bi- monthly or monthly. Therdore, the parking demand L heavily concentrated during sgseiflc Lime perloda. Sven though this 130 PLANNING COlalI88IG. 3TAPP AEPOAT ISPA 41-03 - CITY Cy RASCAC COC,SNONGA April 34, 1991 , Page 5 amendment contemplate the location of these laeilitiu within ~. tM iMuatrial uea, which utillxes fairly atendud pack hours of operation of Nonday through Prlday, 7j00 a.m. to 5,00 p.m., a conurvativa parking zaqulrement should br raquirad to snouts Lhat negative impaMa era mitigated to maintain the atathetic^ of eurroundlnq buainuwe. Both the Swap Nast (Outdoor( and the Indoor/Wholesale Retell Commareial uses should mast the aaa atanduda. 6ta[t nmonua the [ellnwina, 3. Indoor WhoUrale/Aatail Co~oatcial and Swap !Wt (outdoor) was rhall awe tM pukiaq raquiramant of 1 apace pr 150 aquas tams. e. Additional Suhmtital lz=_iramantee To mnaura tMt aurroundinq land uses um not negatively impacted, additional filing raquiremsnb shall ineluda a bit Managaunt Plan and Traffic Impact study. 1. Sib Nsnamament Plan: Laua wch ae wcurity and ^!t maintenance should be addreaerd by tM rppllcant to ensure that aaequat servico ue provided for clLntrla and rurmundinq land uaaa. Items to W addrnaad within the Management Plan ue: e. Trash collection and rib maintnanw b. security and rafety control maaauraa c. Puking attendants and Circulation diractora d. Graffiti ramovQ and building maintenance •. Personnel managamant Z. Traffic impost Study: Beetuu of tM possible traflie iatwity reLtatl to [M uses, the 6nginaerinq Division recammenaa that a Traffic Impact study should W auhmittrd to the Clty Engineer addrarrlnq the following itrmrs a. Trip generation b. Traffic voluasf distribution c. Accoe analysis d. In[arnal circulation •. Mitigation measures, if required by the analysis, shall W rhawn. 13°~ PLANNING COMMIabIO. iTAFP ABPOAT I9PA 91-03 - CITY O? RANCHO CVC3YONGA Aprii i8, 1991 Page 6 IV. CONDITZONN OF APPROV *~: In eneuting that all potential is sueB atB ~. mit igated in coneidsring theca types of aces, the following concerns would W addressed through the Conditional Du Permit process and/or Condltlons of Approval: o Building and eatery Department - The eulldlnq and safety Department will require plena to W prepared for the plan chock review procus, prior to the luumce of building permit e. The plane must provide compliance with the gniform Building, plumbing, and Mechanical Codas anA •b. w.. +.....: electrical Code as adopted by the Clty of Aancho Cucamonga. o Businu• Licensing - It will W the uaponaibility o! the swap moot organi:er to provide the Business License Department with an updated list on a monthly basl• of a21 vendors. If the organiser dwe not supply the list, they will ba ruponeible for businos license peymant• for vendors. The list should include the mailing addrows for all vendors. o Pollee and Yire Department - once the file hss been deemed complete, both the pollee and fire departments will be contacted for written eoamente regarding any proposed Swap Meet Or Indoor Nholeeale/Retail Commercial use prior to Planning commission review and approval. o CotlR HnforeeaNnt - Tae Code 8nforeament Division will be notified of any applieatlon prior to Planning Conemiseion review and approval. o All ^ignage in conjunction with the swap meet vet will bo eubjeet to tM City•a Siqn Ordinance and/or any Slgn Program In place on the project Bite. In addition, permanent wall eigne and/ar monument ^Sgns in conjunction with thlo typo of use may be eubjeet to DRC review and approval. o The uea will ba monitored to maintain the aeeihetit quality of the area and compliance with conditions of approval. o Any special went, such as a promotional sale, will ba conducted by the management entity and shall be subject to the Temporary Use Permit proceu. V. BNVIAONMENT 0. A-aRCewewm; The pDtantSal environmental impacts related to those types of usos are traffic and esthetics. A traffic study will be cequlred to W submitted by any applicant for this typo of proposed use. The study will identify potential problems related to the uea and poelble mitigation srasuro. The second leue relaUS to aetMiics. Mother submittal requireent 140 PLANNING CONNISdIO. lTAP} REPORT ISPA 91-03 - CITY' oP RANCRO CVCAMONGA Apri'_ 2dr 1'391 . Pegs 7 shall M a eomprxhanxive xwnagemant plan that will addraex ioua ~ wch ee site malntmace and truh dixgal. eta![ will xnaure that the aotMlLe charaetxr of tM Lnduatrial area le eaintainad through Condit Iona of approval. In additions Coda 6nforeement shall M notified of thaw propoul^ urly wlthln the rwiew prows and atoll continua monltorinq of tM uw to xnwrx caapliance with tM condition of approval. Therefore, xtaff has found no xigniflcant impacts ax a xeeult at thin prepoeed text amendment and receeraandx Lwanee el a Negative Declaration. .:. -' -:. ++euaeuns rn progea pmleet la conxixlent with thx Lnduetrial Aeee Sgclfic Plan end tM Oenral Plan. The project will not M detrixxwtal to Wjaant progttiee or cauw •ignifLoant adverea environmental lmpaMa. vI I. COAREBPONDEHCES Thla Sta hax ban advertlxed as • public hearing in tM jnland Vallev Daily Eulletin newaggr by an eighth pegs sdwrtixeant. VIiI. gx Staff racemande that tM Planning CammUaion reco®end approval of thL amendant atW leeuance of • Negative Declaration 6y tM City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution. Rsaq y xubm c Brad e City Planer BB:AN:j• AttachmenCes Exhibit 'A" - Indueteial Sgcifie Sabarese Nap Resolution of Approval Ordinance X41 c~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ :~ ~$ •~~. ~~ ®® - - ~_ Com•iu iomr valUtts felt incidental ratailinq in the industrial aru could he sueeusful, but it needs to be •ite apeeiiic. She was opposed to requiring customers to cross through • loading aru. Coamiea sonar ToUtoy thought retail should be conducted in a buildlnq doigned for retail use. He did not want to loco the industrial area lnlo a stall aru. ~ Nr. Buller stated the provision conditionally permitting retail has always bon in the industrial Rzu Specif ie Plan, and these hwe not 6sen many applicstlons. Nm did not tul it would G a common uu. Me wggoted the applicant W psrmitbd to LnvsdLgate with staff to ue if a batter layout could be provided. Commiwloner Chil Ua .recce chu :O r=:cct ~~ ,Nl:ee /orofeoional buildings sre permitted to M retail in the Haven Avenue Overlay District, but she felc the permitted percentage of retell should De much lea in a wataAOUp buildlnq. 8ha felt that !M application should only W approved it it Included lus Cloor area, a total raorgani•ation of the parking lot, and additional landeeapin9• She Ult retail uu should only b• incidental. Notion: Moved by tulcher, uconded 6y ToLtoy, to dLtaet staff to prepare a resolution of tlenial for Environmental Aeseasmant and Condltlonal Uq Persle 91-OB for adoption on the consent calendar at the Nay S, 1991, seating. Notion carried by the followlnq vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, 1ffiLCNER, TOLSTOY, VALLETT6 NOES: COMNISSIONAA9: NONB RESENT: COlDiiSSIONEASs NONE -carried • . • . ~ C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSlOSNT AND INDOSTRIRL SPECIPIC PLAN AMEIIDNYAT 91-03 - CITY oy MNCHO COCANONGA- R ragout to awnd the Industrial Area Specific Plan by adding swap meet and estsneive impact commercial use and LMir development criteria within the Specific Plan area. Staff racoeYaenas luuance of a MpKive Drclaration. Mna-Lisa Hernando, Asaletant Planner, proented the cleft report. Chairmen NeNiel eked 1f any cities prohibit avail meats. Me. Hernando rsplled affirmatively. Chairman McNiel opened the public hurlnq. Richard !agar, LwL Hovies, 1156 North Mountain, Opland, stated tMt the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga eapecta dwelopment to W • cut above otMr eitiea. He felt swap meet - either indoor or outdoor - would W an lneempatlble use for Planning Coamiwion Minutes (~- April za, 199: ~N 3 • the City. Ne requoGd Chat neither indoor or outdoor swap wets bs permitted. Rance Clouu, Ue 6 AsaocLaEea, stated the rsquot for an awndwnt for indoocr swap meat uw had Deu brought Mfore tM Plaminq Cowiulon in January 1991. Ne uid the purpou of tM amendment L to establish ht9h etandarda [oc developpmt. Chairman NcNiel eked if Mr. Clouaa had looMd at any outdoor awy mech. Nr. clouu rupondsd negatively. Xe said hie elient•• concern ru that eMre L no clur definition oC indoor swap peseta. Comd aaV ~..e. V~1 nw~. ~4..~ 13f ~~~ ~ •~Vl~ll lea an the Clty would M able to provide the proposed requlred,parkinq. Nr. Clouu bellwed there to M uveral fae111tLe which would meal the requirewnts. James Page, Grnival Malls, 6221 Warner Dries, Loa Mgelms, eGled ha had applied Ln Rancho Ncamonga 4eeauw he rallred hie proposed typo of N Lndoor faeil ley 1• an upgrade over traditional crap meets. Me felt the uee is more comparabU to • mall with concerns about parking, fret [ic, and security. Ne Lndicated rpional w1U do not accommodate small enlreprenwu 6y having booths of only 100 to 200 square feet. Ne commented that generally eraific problems are crutsd because swap meet are located near rseidutial arus. • Re also felt his propceed uw we not compatible wiih retail becuse of the lnerused traffic tM swap meet uu would generate. CammLalonsr Ne1eMr asked how the proposed uee differ fras typical outdoor swap meets. Mr. Pngs responded that he propoud incubator outlet epees for small manufactureza. Ro said ha would provide amenitiu for chtldru (sorb u kiddie ride) and passive entertainment for other family memWrs. Ne reported that they would be operating on • 520,000 pet month advertiainq budget. He uid they would only M open on weskende and only 52 percent o! tM total fiver space would M retail uee wleh the remainder of the space used tot open space and awnitiu. Co®luloner Chitlu asked Sf Nr. Page planned to charge an admission fu. Mr. Page replied they had not decided ae yet. Nt. Mager reported hie firm Md been approached by uwral swap wet operator wishing to loeaL in tM Cameo cancer. Re uid they Md rKused to consider tM ue beuuu they did nct ful indoor swap muU will M eucceuful. Na did not think enough retailers could W ateraded to [111 the apace. Dsran Yalian, 9071 Nildtlowc Drive, Rancho Cucasonga, elated M wu part owner of Carnival Nall. Xe showed • sketch of • propoud hall. Ne indicated e.I Planning Commission Ninutre f4i April 24, 199: 14 ~{ EXh~b)~ ~~~~, - ~ • they had eowldared the Cameo wne•r, but the wnbr did not have wflitient patklnq. as there moat no further tutLmony, Chairman NcNiel closed eh• puDlie huring. _ Ha said that the Commiuion waa currently considering standards, ao that It the use were approved, it would b• a cut above. CommLaioner Tolatoy thought that incuba[or retail opportunities wand like an sxeltinq program. H• did not L•1 outdoor swap meets should W permitted at all except for special fund-rai•inq •vnb. H• did not Wliwe indoor swap meets would b• approprlaG in the Hury Indwtrial asu. H• wu eancern•d that any swap mast uw could crab truh generation proDlua, graffiti, and management problems. N• felt the bigqut problems would M in the area of crar uc enm parxanq. Ne tnougnc patklnq should W tt • utio of ana apace qr 100 aquae feat. Commleeioner Ch Sties did not feel awnp meats aze appzoprlata within the City. She euggasbd that if any swap mwt uu 1e to W considered, it should only b• indoor. sN Del hued eM use should only be in the eoamerelal aru, Decaue it La a retail uu, but felt that traftle floc and patbru need to W eonaid•red. she did not ful the we to be at ill approptlde Sn the Lnduetrlal aru. she old she had mover eNn any •wap mute that hav bun maintained properly. CommL aioner Valletb agreed with staff reeomm•ndaticns. aM thought the •wap meet orgsnlzer should ba required to provide a monthly listing of all wndoza including mailing addreuu. she felt maintenance r•quiresrnb ehould W etringant and parking raquiremente should b• d lust one apace par 100 aquae fut. commiuioner Meleher stabd he wu inclined to agru with coamiulon•r Tolatoy regarding prohibiting outdoor swap mNte. Ne asked how the City aoUld polLce the requireunt that only new goods G sold. He hoped tM uw would no[ W factory store. Ne wo conwrned that monitoring by code enforcement mould be vary came consuming and upawive. Chairman NcNiel Lalt that outdoor swap maim should only W permitbd on an occulonal basis undo the temporary uo permit proceu. He concurred with a perking ratio of one apace pez 100 aquas. fut. H• felt the uw could b• permitbd in the induatrisl aru i! hour. warm limited to wwkend wa. CommLaiomr Chitin stated the wu concuned shout atatP• tame in policing the uu. sM aid aha wu very uncomtorta6lm with the eonwpt a the did not uLh to undercut the retaLl aru. 6M supported gap manta as • [and raiur for charity puzpoaes with a tuporary uq permit. Commlasioner Melchor asked Kaft'a ruwninq for uleMinq a parking ratio of one apace per 150 .guar. tut. Ma. Hernando: stated that •taft had conducted an exhaustive eiudy and Santa Ma wu the only city requiring one .paw pmt 100 aquae fat, but their nee is not in an industrial area. Planning Coamlaaion Minutaa y. April 26, 1991 14S C~ch~6~'~ ''A"-3 • Dan Coleman, Prlneipal Planner, stated that daft would be eamtortabU wish a ratio of any whore from one space per 100 equnre feet Go one apace per 150 aquas foot. Commi uioner Chitiea fele introduction of the uea may hurt tM proposed ~ regional mall. Sha felt Chat if [he uu were to bo approved it should W Ln the eommucial area. Chairman NtNiol felt the uao to be appropriate. Nt. eu ller recommended thst CM iGm ba continued tar Cwo wNke to allow staff to prsprre a ruolution addreuinq the Commiesion•a concerns. He suggeKed outdoor swap mesh could perNps M eliminated and the parking could be cnangen to one space par 100 equate foot. Ae said swap meets that are held on occasion ass permitted under the temporary up permit requlatlons. Ne aggested staff could inveetigeb the lda of lnatitut in9 a fee to cover enforcement. Chairman NeNlel reopened the public hearing. Motion: Moved by MelChar, aeCOnded by Toletoy, to continw 6nvitonmental A-seaement and Industrial 9peeific Plan Amendment 93-03 to May S, 7991. Notion carried by the following vote: AYSSx COMMISSIONERS: NCNIeL, NSLCID:R, TOLSTOY, VALL8TT6 • NOE3: COMMISSIONSRSx CNITIBA ABSENT: CONK ISSIONER3x NONB -carried • • + . Notion: Novel by Melchor, aeeonded by Toletoy, unanimously carried, to continw the meet inq beyond 11:00 p. m. The Planning Commission recesaad [ram 11:30 p.m. to 11:45 p.m. f • f f L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DIBTRICT AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY o! RANCHO COCAMONOA - A [squat to amend the Devolopmant DLtricte Map from 'OP• ~Of[iee Professional) to •lBSP• (TOOthill Boulevard Specific Plan) for an 2 B.3 acre parcel located ai the northeast Corner o[ loothill Boulevard and Roehuter Avenue - APNx 227-152-18 and 30. Staff recommends Leuanp of a Negative Declaration. N. $NVIRONlRNTAL_ ASSE8SMENT AND lOOTNILL BOVLEVAAD SPECIDIC PL1W AlBSNDMENT 91-01 - CITY Ot AANCNO CUCANONGA - A Iaqueet to arnd tM both 111 Boulevard Specific Plan to include Lha Y 8.3 acre parcel at tM nar[heast corner of loothill Boulevard and Rochester Awnue within Subarea 6 and estaDliah Kandards for development - APNx 227-152-18 and 30. Staff recommends iawanw c[ a Negative DecleratLan. Planning Commiaaion Minutes 1mv April 24, :991 CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA~1tONGA STAFF REPORT GATE; January 9, 1991 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner ~uo.ii:~T: wnai U[HAIIDN IU INITIATE AN INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN ND N I LU N S N D IN N S [. RE EST: The Planning Division has been approached by several companies interested in establishing swap meet fac flirt es within the Industrial area. The "swap meet" use is specifically identified within the Industrial Specific Plan as an Extensive Impact Cammerci al use. However, there are no existing development guidelines. Therefore, staff is requesting that the Comm ssi on direct staff to provide a clear definition and provisions for this proposed use. II. BACKGROUND; In the past, swap meets were associated more with outdoor flea market type of operatio n5 which involved the sale or "swap" of used merchandise. These swap meets were usually held on weekends on drive-in theater parking lots, such as the one at Ramona and Mission in Pomona. Some of today's swap meets, such as the Orange County Swap Meet, involve the sale of strictly new merchandise. Indoor swap meets are the latest variation on the swap meet concept, and are also generally involved only in the sale of new merchandise. I [I. ANALYSIS: There are two primary issues related to Lhis swap meet issue; the first issue deals with the existing definition and land use compatibility and the second issue relates to provi sion5 and requirements for a swap meet use. A. Land Use: Currently, a swap meet use is listed under the Extensive Impact Commercial category within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Such a use is permitted only in the Heavy Industrial zone (Subarea 15) through the Conditional Use Permit process (see Exhibit "A"). Extensive Impart Cammerci al is defined as the following: "those which produce or may produce a substantial impact upon the surrounding area. Uses typically include but are not limited to amusement parks, drive-in movie theatres, flea markets, outdoor auction sales, or swan meet activities..." PLANNING COMMISSI O. ,TAPE REPORT PRGY IJi D~\J%J TANIMRD.S - +'AAO YCE T~ January 9, 1991 ' Page 2 There is no clear definition of the swap meet use within the [ndustri al Specific Plan. As written, this would include both indoor and outdoor swap meets. Typical activities, items, and ~~ location related to this type of use are not explicit within the Extensive Impact Commercial definition. Also, opportunities may exist for LhiS use in other zones. for example, subareas which allow Medium manufacturing may be compatible with swap meets. In addition, no specific regulations and provisions ezist. There are a number of social dynamics related to this use. whether indoors or outdoors, a swan meet use is sure to attract a high concentration of people to a site. Provi dons and guidelines need to be clearly stated so that surroundf ng land uses wSil not be negatively impacted. 0. Development Standards: Compatibility of the use within other zone designations, business licensing, parking, site maintenance, and security are just a few of the issues that need to be addressed in the Industrial Specific Plan. Seven ti ti es with known swap meets, and Los Angeles and Orange Countf es were surveyed regarding their land use regulatf dns and requirements. Unfortunately, each jurisdiction had widely differing regulations. 1V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that swap meets should only be considered through a Conditional Use Permit process. Further, swap meet activities should 6e located away from residential and commercial areas and may be appropriate within General Industrial, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial and Heavy Industrial subareas of the City. If the Planning Commission tan support Lhis concept, then staff may 6e directed to initiate an amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan to further clarify the definition of a swap meet and to develop suitable development standards. Brad City BB :ALH:js Attachments: Ezhi bit "A" - Industrial Specific Plan Map Exhibit "B" - Industrial Specific Plan Summary of Land Uses ~y~ ~X k~l~1T "E'~Z Q 2 F Q w x 4 J Z O ~~ ~:. ~~'~ V 1` ~~ _ (~ S }, 3r r~~ l~ 3 TABLE Itl-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA • PERMITTED VSE + CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE: Non-marked Usaa Nql P•r mitt•tl USE TYPE8 Land Ua•' IP GI GI GI ~ GI GI IP ~ IP' GI Lh GI ~ 61 ~ ~ IP I OI ~ GI XI ~ IP IP Subuu• HOB 1 Z J 4 S ~ 6 T S 9 10'11 11 19 14 13' 16 17 AANUFACTURING ~ ' ~ ~~ CYelom I • • • • I • • • • • • • •~ • • • Lghl • • • • • ~ • • • I • • • • ~ • i M•tllum ~ +I4 ~~~ ~•~ ~ ~+~•I•~\~ •~•I•I r 1 Navy Proln•ionN:OOiVn S•rvin• I ~ I+• I+I T I • I •I+I I ICI • +I+I I • • o +I +I+ •I• +~ +• + + •• Rnarob ••rvko ~ I•I•~•I•Ir~•I•I•I I•I•I •I•I•I I•I• V~Slora•• ~ i • i ~ • + + Ligm • • •~ • • • • •I •I•' •I • • • •' COMMERCIAL ~ I ' A•rkWlurWMrs•ry tWppllo \ 6avle•• • • • • • • • Animal Can Autanoth• Flat •tor••• I '+ + + ~ ~ i ' + I +I + 4' ' ~ f , Aulomotlv R•nbLLa•irlq • I I I + } + I i I I • • • + • 4 +' Automolla /LIpNt Truok Rp•Y-War I • + I ~ I + ~ • ~ I I • AulomolW ~ Truek Repair-Major Aulomotlv 6elo I • + + I I I I •I I I AutomotivS•rvie•St•tlon 4 4i + +i +I + } + 4 '+ 4 Bull•Iny GonbeMarL OtNee { YMda ~ Builtlin nb r' C t St Y tl I ~ + \ + *I • I • ( I • • q o •o o a or•q• ar BWMM Y kt • l ! l i • I I l ~ ~ • • a•ne• •YV ea • • • a p l • • • I • • Bwldinq 6LigMmq ERUipm•nt SupNN•83a1•• • + • + i • • + • I+ + •Y•IMM SWIY R•teB • 6•MCH ~ • • •I • I I • I • • I ' • I • • • ! BJOIM•a $appprt S•IVIC•• • Coml••de•tl•n 6•IN•a • ~ • i • + • • • • + • • • • • ' • + I + + ~ • • • ' • I +r • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Canwmmc•S•b•B Savicn + + + + + 1 + I + + +: +I + + + + + + '+ • ` EatMq t Orblkblq EeU•a•M•M• • ~ ~I • • 1• • • I • ~ • ~ • I • ~ • ~ ~ I • • ~ • rt mm•nt I I + I I EatM r i Fa•t Food Sala + Fln•naW, MM••na A MN GtaN S•nlc•• • , + • • • I I I ! Food88•voa•Sal•• + + + 41 + + + 4 + + + +,++ + +'~+' FuarN • Gemet•ry •errk•• ~ + I + I ~ +I N•av EgNpm•nl Salo L Ratal• v i i 4 i + '+1 4! + •~ ~ NoNI/WIN ~ 4 ' • • I I • ( I~ ~ •' • Laundry S•rvlea M•dlcN/N•MM Care •erYk• ! • • + • • • + 4 • • + I + ' • ~ •j 4 ~ , • ~ i! PenonN S•rvkn +I P•hpkun h•dlab ftara•• ~ +. +~ + 4 i + + + i I + + + + +~ I R•crotional FatiMU•• + + ~ + ~ ! ! ~ 4 + + + + + • + + + Rpalf tl•rYlea • I • • • • • • • I • I • ~ • I + Scrap Operation + CIVIC AdmIN•intlve Clrl< S•rNCa • • • • • • • • • • I • • CWtural • + + + I +'+ + + 4 Eat•1WO Mnp•et UlRlty FeepNW ~ I~ S I+ + ~ I ~ Flood Contrdi Utility Cortldor ~ I Publlp Mam•IY ~i • •I • • ~ • I+ I ) ' I+ • ~~ • • I+~ • ~ ' It , +~'+' I+ •I vgmlc s•aty a uurtr S•rak•. + •I + i + • + I+ + + ''.+ + '+ + • • + + R•Rypya M••mblY '+ 4~ t ~+ I4 I i ~4I ~ ~ ~+!~ + + i IP-mduatnal Park GI-G•n•ral Induatrul NO-Maven Av. Ovulay Onlnct 1~ MI NI-Nimmum Impact Mea.r ^.. ~'~~a! NI-Navy IntloV~al Caesaiuioner Nelchsz ukM if it would bs pouible !o indicate that Ghe use is not adequately def lned Ln the Development Coda and iM Commieaion wLhad to utilize the Condit tonal Oo Pezmit pcocus. Dan Coleman, Principal Plainer, euggeated modifying the reeolutlon to lndieab ~, the uu to be a recycling operation and requlrinq • Conditionsl Up Permit. Notion: Moved by Toletoy, ueonded by Nelcher, to adopt a zeeolution determining the uw to M a recycling operation requiring a Conditional Vp Permit. Motion carried 6y tM tollwinq vote AYES: COMMIS SIONEABi NCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLBTTE NOES: COIw/ISSI0NEH.l nvna ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA -carried • • • • . 9:00 p.m. - Planning ComLeion receued 9:10 p.m. - Planning Cammiasion reconvened . . • . I. PROVISIONS AND STANDAADS POR INDOOR SNAP MEET9 Mn¢-Llsa Hernandez, Au ietant Planner, presented the etalf report. Chairman McNiel asked for clariflcat son on why the issue wu Minq considered. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that eta![ had bean approacMd by two inriruud partlu. Ha mold staff wu puiauinq the matter becwee it was beliwed the uu may M reuonsble in tM City and it uaa felt that swap m.eu have undergone a eraneition •inee ineeplSon of tM Dewlopamnt Casa. Aance Clouu, Lw S AuoelatH, 10370 Comerce linter Ozive, AancM Cucaaanga, stated ha represented a property Amer who wished to Luc • 6uildinq for such uu. Ha felt the use to M dgni[lcently dlfArent [rain tM tradieional veep moat Mcauu only nw products mould M sold and tM bueineu would W conducted entirely indoors. He uid tM location iMy reptewnUd hatl •ignif Leant amount of parking available. Ne thought that from tM outside of a bulldinq, tM building vuy be peicsived as a manulacturinq or office building. He qid tM Chamber of Coamerce Au been approached 6y manufacturers with propoeal^ for an outlet concept. Rs felt CM induatrtal area would be an appropriate location for such uue. coamluioner 1NLcMr asked the location of any similar tacilities. Planning Cow¢ieeion Minutes r January 9, 1991 ~S~ Exl~~b,~ ''r "-~ Mr. Clouu ruponded Ghat the eloost in concept would probably be locaGd Ln victorvllle. He uid tMy planned to hive public interest and entertainment areas. Ha uid the Indian Nill Mall in Pomona would also be wmewhat •Smilar. chairman McNiel asbd if the operation would be •Lm1Lr to a trod. show. ~ Mz. Clouw ruponded it would be •imllar Dut more upscale, as the boaehe mould 6a permanent. Chairman McNiel asked !f the booths would typially be leased on a long-term basis. Mr. Clouse rupondsd affitmatlvely and indicated that uch individual buainue owner wouac oe aYO).CL co cna ouunus ucenelnq requlzements of the City. Commissioner Toletoy ukad if they ware propodnq a 7-day par wank operation. Mr. Clouse replied that shay were sntertaininq the notion that the facility would be open on frldaye for stocking and come bualneu, but tM bulk of businu^ would be limited to weekends. Ha felt the uu could W brined a mini-mall. Commie Loner Va1Ltb stated she had been to the Indian HL11 swap nx+st and ehs had concerns regarding traffic and the pobntial requlrament for addieional 8heriff'• urvicu. She felt thou wncerne could be addrusad with Condit Tonal Uu Pezmit. Mr. Clouu stabd the[ the die Ae had in mind would offer a unique layout which could W uaLly ueured and hu an everabundanee of pxrking. Comm oioner Toletoy sbtad that the Indian HL11 Mall is loeabd !n a conqubd part of tM city. Me thought that placing each a uu in the industrial area should allwiab come of thou problems and ha felt it might 6e a good way Co utilize some unused buildings. Has Hagman, 7832 Bth Htrut, Mncho Cucamonga, dasetibad the proposed operation. He likened Lt to a department store, but not n luxury department store. Ha acid shay proposed approzimately 500 booths in a 100,000 square foot building. Xe indicated that It would offer evatything from clothing to jewelry zed possibly fusnltun. He uid vendors like [M concept beeauu they do not have to pay • large averMad. Chairman McNiel eked if the individual booth would W clooable. Mr. Hagman replied they mould haw woodu gates. TMre were no further public cammsnb. Mr. Huller stated that ebtt had in[ormed the two applicant^ that i[ the Commie ion determined that an amendment would G duiraDle, a project could a processed concurrently witA such an amendment. Planning Conmiseian MLnutn Ab January 9. . N ~S 2 E~h;b;f~ ,, F,,_a Chairman McNiel felt the City should W cautious not to provide unfair competition to retailers. He thought such a uu might not be appropriaG Ln coomercial area. Corluioner ToLtoy hit there are problems unique to this type o[ operation. which need to M rostrched. Hs felt there could be trerndous parking lot problems including littering, destruction at landscaping, and the potential for outdoor ealu. Ha thought !raffle, circa latlon, law enfercarnt, and street cleaning impacts would also need to W considered and businus licenr and uUa tar ueu should bs addresud. Commiuloner richer felt such • concept had been utilired etLCtlvely in other arwe of the country. Hm thought Lhe concept may oven work in chopping ....~:.. .. :7: ::.j.tj ..-~..-i.y Cammisaionmr ValLttm felt perhaps the numWr of vendor booths wiChin building should 6e regulated. Chairman NcNlel stated that in Denver a largm port lan of tM1r historical areas has been reclalmmd and diumctmd into small ehopq and scan though they arm loeatmd lmrdiaGly aeroo the etrNt trcm a major downtown mall, neither typ. or operation scans to kuffmr. Hm therefore Jolt that perhaps comrrcial •ltss should W considermd. Cammiuianmr Tolatoy ukmd what otMr programs may have to W dels[ed Si rtalf ware to take the time Co rueatch meh an arndrnt. Nr. Buller replied that slat[ would proceW only if a dweloper ware to proceed with an application to the City. Hm indieatmd that the develoyer would bm required to filr for the arndrn[, and their paying of the lase would place the project on a priority. It was the conunsua of the Cammiolon that mush an amendment would bs appropriate and should be initiated if an arntlrnt request Ls submitted. • • . . . R. D6 ewweR b 1990 P avrI - CCaM2• - Aevlw and concurrence with Memorandum outlining commiuion action at hotel Pack Library ibrkshop Brad Huller, City Planner, stated that the meow wam meant to be a summary action of the Dmesmber 6, 1990, planning Cpmelseion workshop. Chairman NcNiel felt the notes care not complete and he thought the conclusion statmrnt implied there would not W further reviw by the plannlnq Cariuion. Coriuioner Tolstoy etaUd that there were ear items and concerns wised at the mrtlnq that rre not addrused by the notes. Ne felt Lt should be noCed that the reviw procn• hu not concluded but Se an on-going proceu. plannlnq Cpasiulon Minuts• ~-~ January 9, 1991 X53 &h,b~l "t~-3 Commiuion ar +tatad M was in favor of directing aGff adveCtiN a ~ new public hears allow the appl Leant the opt loo of fu addraaalnq the Planning commlaeion. Notion: Nov+d by Nelehar, eeo y Chlti o direct staff to readvertita a public h+arinq for Snvitonent• men[ and Contl ltlonal V+e PermiC 91-OS. Not Lon earrled by the fol q vo AYBS: NCNISL. NELCfR1I~NOLSTOY. VALLFTT6 N063: ~SSSIONmtB: NONE U. $NYIRONMSNTAL A33688NSNT 11N0 ZNDUSTRIAL ePtCIlIC PLAN ANENDMNNT 91-03 - CITY oy AANCRO CUCAMONGA- A squat to amend the Indetrial Ara speei[ic Plan by adding swap met and exeen+iw Impact eommerclal uu and their development eiiteria within the Spacifie Plan area. Staff recommends iuuance of • N+gative O+elaratlon. (Coot inued from April 26, 1991.( Anna-Liu Hernando, Auiatant Plannerr Br++enUd the staff report. Chairman NcNlel open+d the public herlnq. Jams Paga, 156a3 Sherman Nay, vu Nuye, eoncurrad wllh the staff report. He indicated that at tM laK meting a rdoenq had ben made to tM swap meC in soots Ma and the fact that they have axpaziencad prrklnq problems even though their requitemenL• call [or one epaee par 150 aquae tut. H+ r+portad that Ghe swap mast Sa located at tM eornar oC Narner Avenu+ and Narbor 9ouLvud, botA six-lane straete, and that there Sa an aeee• problem. Ha fal! CM parking lot Sa mots than adequaG [or tM 160,000 aquas foot fscillty. Ha cammentad that CM facility L run six days par wek (closed on Tuedaya). a veld tM [our drivwaya all secure accau from a 60-foot wlde strut. N+ SadieatW that Meauae the swap mast oparaba tM same hour o tM aurrouMlnq industrial uus, large trucks park on the 60-loot atret making it d1f[SCUlt to elt the parking lot. Ha thought Valley Indoor Swap Nast in Moadland Hi1L to M clover to their ue. Ha old that particular swap mast geuaratee 363 tripe durlnq qak hours. Ha reported Ala traffic study projeMa 31] ttlps durlnq pack hour. H+ indicated that if tMy project 400 public care plus 100 vendor care, that would only account fox 500 vehicle, while tM •ita they an inbrestad !n hu over 700 apace. Ha raquetad that the ue M approved at ono apace per 150 square [et rather than oe apace pas 100 square let. He also requetad that the square Pootaga calculation M Geed on only actual ale space. He suggeted thaC on Planning CommLalon NinuGa d~ May 8, 1991 1 J~~ 100,000 equarr loot bulldinq, ono apace par 150 aquas feat would allow the u•s of epproximaGly 50,000 aquaca faaG for tstail uas, while oN space prr 100 aquarr !Nt would only allow the uaa o[ approximately 33 parcrnt. Ha Nid they ware in the proeraa of srcurinq thr complrerd parking and traffic study. ~ Rance Clou u, Lae 6 AuocisUa, 10370 Commrrq Crnter, Rancho Cucamonga, reported a traffic/parking analysis was brlnq contluctW by Au at in Faust and hs felt that foe it it lea era availably in tAe City to mrat the requicamrnta. He raquNGd that tM parking ratio ba drGrmlmd at a lnter point, in the condltion4l uar permit procHa, ratRar than Minq defined in tM Industrial Area Spscif is Plan. Ha indicabd soma facillCLa may oparatr difhnnt hour «~.+~ .n. ha~aney of aurroundinq uwn. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, Lelt the parking Lsae to M at the Mart mf the metNr. Xr thought parking requiraarnb should be eprl Ud out Ln the Industrial MN Specific Plan. chairaun NeNUl agraM. Ha prafarrW to make thr controln rigid and Lndieatrd thy City Could relax eontrola in tM tutus i! tNy Llt thN would M in CM brat intrrNt. Mz. Clouw aakyd iE it mould W poulblr tm art tM parking minimum at oar apaw par 150 aquas !Ne Ln CM ocdinance with tAy poulbil ity of changing to ono apace par 100 aquas tNt in Ua conditionrl uN permit proeeN. HyarLng no further testimony, Chairman McNksl cloud tM public hearing. Na orated hr would pgtar to hour actual Nprrirney that ono apacr par 100 aquas frrt i• working byforr lowarlnq tM atNdud. Comainionar ToUtoy orated that tM PLnnLnq Coumiuion was currrntly conaidrrinq an aaNndmant to the Industrial Mra Sprclfic Plan to dalLna swap meet. and ha did not tail ii wN appropriate to diaquu a apeeific tppllcai ion. Dan colrman, Principal P1anNr, euggNtyd the Commiuion might wish to eonaierr drLying tM action on tM Spreifie Plan amendmrnt until aufl Md lima is rrvirw tM tralflc and parklnq study bring pryparW !or the applicant. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, etatN tRr amendment would have to be Eorwerdrd to thr City Connell for final act Lon, and tM CounUl would Mvr the right to change LM reeo®endation it tM parking study should indieau another numMr would W applleabU. CammiNloner Melchor Nggeaied tM Stem M continued. Ha Lndiceted hr would pryfar to leave the ratio o[ parking open witR tM Commission detrrminlnq appropriatr parklnq during tM eondiLional uN permit process with the auhmlaaion of a parklnq study. Comaiuioner Tolstoy elated a parklnq study would ba for a epecLfic sitr and tM amendmenC i^ for the entire City. Nr did not fNl the amrndmrnt should ba driven by onr aprcific applieatlon. Planning Coo.aiaeion Ninutee ~- May B, 199{ ~ rJs Ex4,; b ~-t ~~G - Comminionar Melcter suggotsd the parking te apecitied tt one space par 150 square fast with sudaission of a pazkiny study juatitylnq the ratio and ona epees par 100 aquas fat in rtes absence of such study. Ccmmiasioner Chltiaa stated she would prefer Co be on rtes conurvat iva •Lda because the City has experienced parking problems in tM pant. CommLSloMS Valletta asked if the one space par 150 square fast wu conurvative compared [o other cities. Ma. xernandar ropondsd that the moei eonorvative requirement wu •ix parking spaces per retell stall. commioloner ToUtoy suggeetad one apaem per 100 square task with a provision that the Plannlnq Co®lulon could ehangm the requirement to one space per 150 square toot it [he appl leant submitted appropriate jotitlcation studio. Motions Moved by Meleher t0 continue 6nvirofwental Asooment and Industrial Specitlc Plan Amendment 93-03 to June 1Z, 1991, to allow staff time to study the parking loos In mars detsil. chairman NcN1e1 reopened the public hemrlnq !o ok if anyone objected to continuance. Mr. Clouse stated the applicant for the upcoming conditional up permit would prefer the matter te voted on and passed to City council. Chairman NcNiel again cloned the public hearing. NOtlOn oiled fOr lack Of • oCOnd. Notion Moved by Tolatoy, seconded by ValLtta, to adopt the Resolution raomsrndinq Suuancs of a Negative DecLretion and approval at Environarntal AoosmenL and industrial Specific Plan Aaendment 93-03 with a parking requirement of one spacm par 100 square fseC, Dut moditied to provide that the Plannlnq Ca®iseion could allow parking at one space per 150 square feet wbjeet to prootetion of traflic and parking etudln. Notion carried by the folloulnq vote AYEBe Cdg1IH8IONHHat CNITIHII, NCNIHL, TOW1Y/Y, VALLHTTH N089: c01g1IHSIO1RRSt MHLCNER A85HNTi COIMIHHIONHAH~ NONH -settled H. ENVIRONNHNTAL AHxHaHMHMT 11e0 66VHL PMBNT emox AYseD -pT 91 O4 ITY OP °`°arcMO - A rsquot to oen0 various devmloprnt atandard• and deign quldelino for multi-lamlly ruidmntial districts. scoff recommends Suuams of • Negative DecLzation. (Continued tram April 1!, 1991.) Plannlnq Co®isslon Minutem 4• May e, 1991 151p Exh~~b,~ ~ G - 3 ORDINANCE N0. ~~ U ~ AN ORDINANCB OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXONGA, CALI PORN Id, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR TIOr INDOOR WHOLESALE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL U56, MODIFYING THB DEFINITION OF E%TENSIVB IMPACT COlp18RCIAL USB, A!II) MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TNERBOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain ae foliose: SECTION 1: Part ILI, Table III-1 ie hereby mended to read, in words and Eiquzea, ae shown in the attached Exhibit ^A^. SBCTION 2: Psrt III, Table IIZ-2, Lmd Use Type Definitions, Section D ie hereby added to read, in vorde and figures, ae follova: D. CONMBACIAL USE TYPES Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercials Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retell, wholesale, or die count sales. These types of buainesaee exclusively involve multiple vendors ael ling new goods in separate, permanent display structures. Uses typically include, but are not limited io: discount outlets and indoor swap meets. SECTION 3: Part III. Table iii-z, Subsection D, land use typo of definition Eor &xteneive Impact Commercial ie hereby amended to read, in vorda and figures, as follows: Extensive Impact Commezcial: Activities typically include, but aze not limited to: those which produce oz may produce a substantial impact upon the surrounding area. Uaea typically include, but are not limited to: amusement parka, and drive-in movie theaters. SECTION 4: part III, Section IV - Subsection F. 3, parking and loading requirmente, ie hereby mended to add: g• Indoor [iholeeale/Retail Commercial use: 1 apace per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the conditional use permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1 apace per 150 square feet subject to presentation of traffic end parking studies. ls1 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. IsPA 5i-G3 - CITY OF INEICNO CUCAMONGA June 19, 1991 ' Page 2 SECTION 5: Pazt IV ie hereby amended to add "Indoor Wholesale/Aetail Commercial" ae a conditionally petwitted ues within Subnreae 8-11 and 13-16. SECT ION 6: ParC III, Section IV, Develoment Ste ndnrde, Subsection K is F.ereby added to read, in rorde end figures, as ahovn in the attached Exhibit"B." SECTION 7: This Council finds that thin amendment rill not edvwrn,.ty affect the envirowent and hereby Saauee a Nsgativs Declaration. SECTION 8s The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or cord of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive lagislationi the xeauining provisions, aectiow, parsgrephs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 9: The City Clerk shell certify Ne adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after Sts pneeage at lea et once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newpapsr of general ci zculation published Sn the City of Ontario, Ce.lifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cnlifornia. ' ~fi TABLE III- 1 SU!y'~'ARY CF LAtip USE TY?c E'r SUo,~nEA • pERMITTEO USE } CONpm ON>l~Y of RMITTEO uSE 40TE von-marred uses rvm =. -~.~i, USE TYFES ••• 1i9n1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,• M•evy Minimum Impel Ngry I I I I I I ' )FFICE FROFESSIONAL DESIGN 6 RESEARCN Aammiandv a orrlc• ~. • I '+1 4 ~ • +i I +i • +I+ • •I pr ofanional p••ign S•rvic•s • 4 ~ + 4 • } 4 • } } ' -^•-~- . ITI TI•I TITI I•I~T TIfI °T: •' Lpnt •' • • • I • - - N•Alum I,+I•MI +• Iy I• •i••I I•I• I M••VY ~I L I -` MATERIALS RECOVERY FACDll'~S (MRFS11 I ~ ~ Collection FaeWtld • • I • • • • • • • / I I • • COMMERCIAL A«IeW1«N/IY«a«Y Su•WI•• • !•rYleo • • • • • • , Animal par• Automodr•yNN Se«N• ! '+ I+ I ~ +I +I ~ +~ +I +~+' +~+I ~+I I I!~ I I AYtomotiY• R•nltlyLnNnq ' • ' • I • ~ +' + + • } } ~ 4 Automollr• N•dt Truck 11•p•Y-Ii1pr I • I + r~i + • • I I • I I • • (: ~ I Automodw Truck R•pur-Major I • I +, • I + • } } AulomodvSW I I l I + •I I i I+I I I I l+l 4ulemetir• SVVm• Slalien + ` + + i ~ + } +I ' +' + + I +' +' SYlldlrq Centr•el«'• O/lle• S YN•• ~ + I tl + I t-I • I I • I • I • I I I I Rwleinq Conlracl«'a St«aq• YarO : t1uY•dsp YW11Kt111t• s«YIOK I neir au mN m.NS t i d asal e ~! I ~ • • I ' + ~ . •I . I . • I • I . I I • I • I I g Ypp •• •. Y w w au o . + + .+ • } } . • •Y•In•K Stpplr ANY S S•rN••• i • I • II _ • i I • • • _ • • • I • I, • I • I Suam•u SulaYert S•rvie•• ' • • + I I • • } • • . • I + + • ~ • •, • ~ • } • I • ,. ConmuYe•tlon BMVICK • I • l i l • I I • • I • I + I • I • • • I +j • I • I Canvmmu SNU{S•rvicu '4 1+ + • + +I + + 4'.+ +I+I+I+I} + 4 }' E•IMp • pYl•M1• [•tW WMNnb • 1~ ~ • • • ~ • • ~ • I ~ • I •I • • • I kl Enbrbims•nt +~ I 4 + + I + +'+I + + EAI•r_iv d•••ct Camtn«eW Fa•t foo•SaN• + + + + + ~ + l+ + + +~+I+I' FInNYeW, Mr•anu • R••1 GW •«vk•• o + • • « + I • • • • Food a ••Y«aq• SW + FuNrN a G•rn•t•ry ••fYl•K + + + + + • + + + + + + + + +, + +', +I+. ! + I 1N•V EqugmMl SW • •Y•W + + • + + + • ~ Inl••I VYIION••WRN•p CtltmrEeW } }', + + + YMC•1/N••11• Ci• ••Ialo• • • • + + • + • + + + • I +I n«a•nN s•r.le•• + + + + + + + + + + I + i +~ RKr•r111arW RK•dH + + • + + + + + • • + + . • . I Iw•+ w.r« . ~ • • . • • • • ~ S« •IIM + crvlc AIIWb•Y•• . . . . • . . . • cwl.r • 4 • t + + + + + •at••Yq E•t•Kt tRl•ty FNMY•. ~ ~ ~ • • Fleo• c«Rra/I11WIy c•Rw•. • • • • • • . . • . I rite ao.•rly + I- i + • • + + • + I 1, + Pu01fc Shay • IA•q S•r•IC•s + + + + + + • + + • + • • +'. + + + A i • + + +' .-•wu•.rrN .«^ at-a.e.rN wWma w/•R-wWllw ulraet M•avr InaY,rr~.~ Ro-M•wn aw. o••rur aarl•t 1•-N.••y wlrw.InN c~.~N ~T "~l„ 6KMIBIT E K. Indoor fiholeeale/Aetaii Co®ercial Criteria: To ensure that ~~ " surrounding land uaee aze not negatively impacted, additional filing requirements shall Snclude a Site Management Plea and a Tralf lc Impact Study ae described balov: K. f. Site Management Plan: Iaecee each ne security and Bite maintenance shall be addressed by the applicant to ensure that adequate services are provided for c118ntele and anrrn:mA{nn_ lenA i.n.n. i1.wa r.. 1.. .dA~....a ur{rb{.. r6. e{rs Management Plan arel a. Trash collection and site maintenance b. Security and safety control measures c. Parking attendants and circulation directors d. Graffiti removal and building maintenance e. Personnel menegement K. 2. Traffic Zmpnct Study: Because oY the possible traffic intensity related to the uaea, a Traffic Impact Study shall be eubaitted to the City Engineer addressing the following items: a. Trip generation b. Traffic volume distxlbution c. Acce99 analyeia d. Internal circulation e. Mitigation neaeuree, if required by the malyaie, shall be shown. QRO. Exh~fb~ff 1{d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 19, 1991 1'O: Nnyor and Members of the City Council PROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager na. uaane u•aea1, Management Malyat II SUBJHCT: COMBIDIIDATION OP nr. REfD a as~ee It ie recosmended the City Council approve the attached Raaolution adjusting the residential rate fur rafuae collection from $13.30 to $15.20 pez month and an adjustment of 14.31 in commercial/industrial rates for basic refuse service effective July 1, 1991. SACROROVND Staff and the three residential haulers have negotiated a $1.90 adjustment in basic refuse service. This adjustment ie neceeaitated by a 244 increase in the County's tipping fee e. The tipping fee factor ie outside the control of the rafuae haulers. This proposed rate adjustment ie requested to take effect ae of July 1, 1991. ANALYSIS Durp Pee Costa son Bernardino County at the Neet Valley Solid Waste Landfill site (Milliken) hoe been experiencing large Lncreasee Sn operating and maintenance costa due to shrinking landfill capacity, increasing costa for closures, and escalating concerns regarding the environment. These expenses and preparation for the future have resulted in the landfill fee being raised 24a effective July 1, 1991. The new Eee per ton deposited will be $29.21; an increase from $23.50 per ton. This $1.03 should be considered a pose through coat. Moreover, the City Council should be aware that $29.21 per ton ie still Considered a low dump fee for an urban area in Southern California. Aa surrounding landfill sites near capacity and alternative methods of diapoeal are developed, the Coate will continue to rise. lp Rafuae AaG adjustment June 19, 1991 Page 2 Ae 939 Integntsd Naaq Lsgialatioa AB 939 is the stets of California'^ comprehwneivs program for Solid Neste Management. This legislation mnndatee local a9enclea to develop • soured reduction and recycling element as pnrt of their genecsl plane. Specifically, the legislation requires citioe end counties to diver: 25i of all solid waste from landfill or transformation facilitios by January 1, 1995 tlfrough source rscucriw,., .ac..aiag, t^~ ^..aposltina act iviLiea and to divert 50\ by January 1, 20D0. O[Mrrip, Nvmrs financial yenaltiae will W uopowu wyu.....:. caamunity. additionally, the legislation creates s local fee authority for eie isa and counties to Lapose fans in amounts sufficient to pay the coats of preparing, adopting, and implementing an integrated wota management plan including personnel to develop and manage the programs. The fees shell W haaed on the types or amounts of the solid waste, and shell be used to pay the actual costs incurred by the City or County in preparing, adopting, end implementing tae plan ae well ae in setting end collecting the local foes. Staff hoe included a 50.63 fee for aB 939 for Doth reeidsntial and commercial/industrial rates. Thia fee is estimated to generate sutf iciest funds for the development of aB 939 programs. G mausar Prise Indez The County of San Bernardino hoe developed an "industry index' for the refuse haulers. Thia "industry index" ie made up of elemenka which are generic to the refuse business and Ie calculated at 3.37\ which 10 lens than the conventional C.P.I. Thia represents a 50.25 increase for the contract haulers. oGhsr Mack Valley City Refu-~a Rates Staff contacted the cities of Vpland, Chino and Montclair and requested their rate adjustments Eor Council's information. The rates are as follows, 9~d +5~+ Vpland $12.88 515.11 Chlno $13.22 $15.60 nontclair $13.70 $16.50 Rancho Cucamonga $13.30 $15.20 ~0 Z- iwfuse Rata Adjuaternt June 19, 1991 sage 3 Mfuw 8arvica Raesi~ed R Bach campleini the City receives tram a resident concerning refuse wrvice la logged. Ths City has received thrw (3) Ln the peat twlvs (12) months and thew received prompt attention by the haulers. 1t should M noted that each week tM haulers pick up approximately 26,000 resident ial unite. we believe the city continues to receive excellent tervica [ram our contract healers. haute Recycling Prsgsus Aa AD 939 continuos to evolve, it is nnticipateA there will be additional programs proposed in order to meat the mandates of thin legislation. Thus programs may include multi-family recycling; commstcial-industrial recycling; crop off centeret buy back centers) institutional/office recycling) mobile collection system; manual materials racavery facility; mschmired material recovery £acil ityi land[ill salvaging; changing toning end bui7,diag codas ptseticaa to sncoura9a recycling; changing existing rate atructurea to eneourags recycling; and increaeinq merket• fox recycled matariala. Also, the preliminary evaluation of the pilot curbside program will be Conducted in September 1993. At that time, it will be determined if the three month pilot Se sufficient time for a complete avaluatlon of the pilot program. If the three month pilot program provides sufficient data, a City-wide program proposal could be reviewed by Council in December of 1991. The costs of thbce future programs le not known at present and may require additional rate adjustments. Respectfully submitted, C7~j~"~"' ~. Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager DO/t lr DOt590 l l0 3 Resolution No. 91-~~• Page 6 Container shall M esrviced (dumped) at lenat tour (d) tiara par month. Rate in respect to [sequency shall not b• less thin 85a of th ~ 6stea maximum stem. ' H. Tamporery wtvica (lees than thirty (30) dsya). 1. Thrw (3) Cubic yard containers. a. Maximum rate of $73.00 for seven (7) days at loeailon. 6. Neximum rate of $46.75 for each additional n.l n~ ,A...w..\ Rate in respect to frequency shall not be lass than 85a of the stated maximum rate. 2. Aoll oEt container up to maximum torth (60) cubic yards. a. Maximum rate of $354.00 par wroica (dump), howvor, container shall be wrviced (dumped) at leant ones ovary sewn (7) days. Rate in respect to frequency shall not W lean than 95a of the stated maximum rates. 1 b1 i73 RESOLUTION NO. 91-+~ A RESOLOTION OF TBE CITY COUNCIL OF TBE CITY OF RANCHO COCAlHN76A, CALIIORNIA, SETTING A11TE3 FOR AEBIDENTIAL AND CONMRCIAL/INUOSTRIAL REPU88 COLLECTING NITRIN TNY CITY a„ O) RANCHO CUCANOMU71 WBEAEAS, the City Council of the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga recognize chat effective July 3, 1991 the County of San Bernardino aubatantially incrsaaed the tonnage Lase tar refuse depoaitad at the Milliken Landfill sits by 24\1 and WFiSR8A6, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that since July 1, 3990, the last adiustmant in ratan for rsaidsntial rafuas collection, there have Wen aubatantial Lncreaaea in general operating expanses ~r:.,r~ ..y.. Lr ~..~ y..~..:L ......~ ......... ........ ...~ L.Lr w: ...,.....w Cucamonga/ and NRBREAS, the City Council of the city of Aaneho Cucamonga has determined that it 1s necessary for the efficient operation and awwgeawnt of the residential and commercial/industrial refuse collection urvics within Rancho Cucamonga that the maximum rates W adiuated. NOW, TNBRBPOAB, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dwa hereby resolve that the reYea listed Wlow WCOme effective July 1, 3991: SECTION 1: L'harces for Service - Residential. A. Bnaie Individual Residential Unit rate utilizing curb aarviea and individual payment. 1. Haximum monthly rote $15.20 per aervic®. 2. Maximum monthly rate differential for service north of enrtyan Street $0.70 per service. 3. Maximum monthly rate for senior citizen $5.80. a. senior citizen shall W anyone sixty-two (62} years old, head of household, and have a request with permiYtee. B. Multiple Residential Unit rate utilizing curb service and group payment. 1. Haximum monthly rata shall be $15.20 for the first unit and $16.20 for each unit thereafter. 2. Haxlmum monthly rate differential for service north of Banyan 50.70 per unit. C. Multiple Residential Unit rate utilising three (3) cubic yard refuse containers. 1. Maximum monthly rata shall W as follows in xeapect to frequency of service. a. one service weakly S 90.00 b, Two services weekly $139.00 c. Three aervicae weekly $185.00 d. Four aervieea weekly 5237.00 e. Pive services weekly $256.25 f. Six aervicae weekly $336.50 lto~ Resolution No. 91-~*• Pegs 2 D. Temporary service (lase than thirty (30) days). 1. Three (3) cubic yard containers. •. Maximum rate of $73.00 for seven (7) days at a ~' location. b. Naximum rote of 544.75 for each additional service (dump). 2. Roil off container up to maximum forth (60) cubic yards. n. Maxi:aum rata of $336.00 per service (dump), however, container shall be serviced (dumped) at i ~ .. ....o ~.. ...~ rn .+.... BBCTION 2s Cheraw fot 6arvice - Commercial/Industrial. s. commercial and Induatrinl rate utilizinq one and one halt (1- 1/2) cubic yard refuse containers: 1. Maximum monthly rate shall ba ae follows in respect !o frequency of service. On-compacted Compacted a. one service weakly $ 76.50 $111.75 b. Two services weakly $109.25 $163.00 c. Three services weekly $163.25 $214.50 Monthly raise in respect to frequency ehnll not be lass than 851 of the stated maximyo rate. e. Commercial and industrial rate utilizing two (2) cubic yard refuse containers: 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be ae follawe in respect to frequency of service. On-compacted Compacted a. One service weekly $ 83.25 $125.00 b. Two eervicee weekly 5126.00 $189.75 c. Three services weekly $169.00 $254.75 Honthly rates in respect to frequency shall not be lase than 85~ of the stated maximum service. C. coamercial and Industrinl rate utilizing three (3) cubic yard refuse containete: 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service. On-compacted Compncisd a. One service weekly $ 99.75 $149.25 b. Two eervicee weekly $153.25 $230.00 c. Three services weekly $207.25 $358.75 d. Four eervicee weekly $260.75 5439.75 e. Pive eervicee weekly $314.25 $520.50 f. Six services weekly 5368.25 $601.00 1 (ps Aesolutioa No. 91-+~• Page 3 Monthly rat// in resp/ot to frequency /hall not 6e Les than 85\ of the stated maximum rate. D. Commercial and industrial rate utilizing four (4) cubic yard refuse eontainexes ~, 1. Maximum monthly rata shall be ae follow/ Ln respect to frequency of service. Un-compncted Compacted a. One service weekly 5114.50 S175.25 b. Two eervicee weekly $183.75 $275.75 e. Throe /arviea/ woekly 5250.75 $376.25 d. Tour service/ weakly $317.75 $676.75 s. Pive /erV1Ce/ Wekly $,1a9. Ia ja77.v~ f. Slx eervicee wekly 5451.75 $677.50 Monthly ratan in respect to frequency /ball not W less than 85\ of the stated maximum rate. B. Commexclel and Industrial refs utilising •ix (6) cubic yard refuse CODtainer/[ 1. Maximum monthly rate shall be ae follows in respect to frequency of service, On-Compacted Compncted a. One service weekly $138.50 $208.00 b. Tvo eervicee weekly $232.00 5348.00 c. Three eervicee weekly 5325.50 $488.00 d. Four eervicee weekly 5419.25 5527.75 e. Pive eervicee weekly 5512.75 $767.75 f. Six eervicee weekly $606.25 5908.00 Monthly rotas Ln respect to frequency shall not be lase then 85\ of the stated maximum rate. F. Food handling and food processing ae defined by Chapter 8.18 (counter-balanced lid), utilizing three (3) cable yard con- tainers: 1. Maximum monthly rate ehnll be as follows in respect to frequency of service. Un-compacted Compacted a. Two eervicee weekly $175.25 $230.00 b. Three eervicee weekly 5228.75 $310.75 c. Four eervicee weakly 5281.75 $391.50 d. Five eervicee weekly $335.00 $472.50 e. Slx eervicee weekly $388.25 $553.25 Monthly rates in respect to frequency shall not be lee/ than 85• of the stated maximws rate. O, Aoll off container up to maximum forth (40) cubic yards. Un-compacted Compacted a. per service (dump) $355.00 5532.50 ~b(o Meolution No. 91-••• Page a Container /hall M wrviced (dumped) at least four (4) times per month. Asta in respect to frequency shall not be leas than 85a of the ~, stated maximum Isles. H. Temporary aarvica (lees than thirty (30) days). 1. Three (3) cubic yard containers. a. Maximum rste of $73.00 for seven (7) dsya at location. b. N/ximum sate of $64.75 for /ach additional /ervlce Itlumnl. Rste in respect to frequency /hall not M Lu than 85a of the atsted maximum rate. Z. Roll off container up to mezimom forth (40) cubic yards. a. Neximum rsb of $355.00 per aarvica (dump), however, container shall be wrvlced (dumpW) at leset once every seven (7) days. Rate in respect to frequency shall not W leec then 85a of the stated maximum rates. 1 b1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA)410NCA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 19, 1991 Mayor and Meatbers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS_ FOR STORM DRAIN ONLY, RELEASE OF NI,NNC •\In \Mr,nn •Vn• II,L JIYM YM31, 11/N W1L1 ll~ CONJUNCTION WITH TRACT 10210 -ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANNEL, LOCATED ON THE NORTHMEST CORNER OF ALMOND STREET AND SAPPHIRE STREET. RECOMMENDATION: The required storm drain 1aproveabnts for the Alapnd Intercept Channel have peen caapleted in an acceptable canner, and 1t is racoiwendad that City Council accept said tagrovea~ents, accept the Nalntenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of 558,740.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Perfonaance Bond 1n Lhe amount of 5587,400.00. BAC1(GROIIID/ANALYSIS Tract 10210 - Almond Intercept Channel -located on the northwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Street DEVELOPER: Nordic Developa~ent/First Hotel Inves4aents 1506 Quail Sireet, Suite 520 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 58,740.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f587,400.00 Respectfully subraitt~ed, Wm. Joe O'Neil V City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachaa!nt RESOLUTION N0. C1i- ~a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~ _. CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE STORM DRAIN IlPROVEMENTS Fq! THE ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANN0. AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of store drain lmproveaients for the Almond Intercept Channel have been coapleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Co~pletion is reQuired to be flied, certifying the work caplets. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaeanga hereby resolves, that the work fs hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s authorized to sign and file a Notice of Ca~pletton with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~ I~q i;l:~r ur~ laa~t;rso cucaAiozc„ - STAFF REPQRT DATE: June 19, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack lam, AIC P, City Manager FROM: Charles J. Buquet II, Council Member BY: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FUImIN6 AVAILABLE FROM THE SOUTH LOAST AIR QUALITY :: ~ a NYNIO L/\LI\I ViJ 11\141 \J4/11/!\11/ RECOMMENOATiON The City Council adopt the attached ordinance. BACK6RDUND Staff has received information from the SCAQMD indicating that As semDly Bill 2166 which authorizes the imposition of an additional j2.00 on vehicle registrations effective Apr11 1, 1991 and another j2.00 effective April 1, 1992 (for a total of j4.00) to be used in air pollution reduction programs has been implemented by the SCAQMD. Therefore, they will receive the additional funding. Cities that adopt the attached ordinance of support for the imposition of the additional fees are entitled to a distribution of the fees Cased on population. The SCAQMD will keep 60% of the funds and the remaining 40% will be distributed to those cities who have passed the resolution. Current estimates are that Rancho Cucamonga would receive approximately j80 ,U00 as its share. This j80 ,000 would have to be used by the City in programs to assist in reducing air pollut icn caused by motor vehicles. Cities that do not pass the resolution will not receive any of the funds and their funds will be distributed to the supporting cities. As you are aware, the City has an approved SCAQMD Regulation 15 smog reduction plan in place which has financial inten Lives as part of it. Therefore, staff would use the funds from the SCAQMD to help off set the costs currently being absorbed oy the general fund. Additionally, the funds would be used to develop new programs and support current programs in place. Respectfully submitted, Charles J. Buquet I cil Member By: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director CB/JH/rs attachment ~~l ORDINANCE N0. >~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MOBILE SOURCE AIR .~ POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAM Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Ordinance. A. Findings. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and declares that: ~.i enerea a, use ~i~y is cummiccea cu improving cne puo nc neairn, safety and welfare, including air quality; (2) Whereas, mobile sources are a major contributor to air pollution in the South Coast Air Basin; (3) Whereas, air quality goals for the region established by state law cannot be met reducing air pollution from mobile sources; (4) Whereas, the South Coast Atr Quality Management Plan (AQMP) calls upon cities and counties to reduce emissions from motor vehicles consistent with the requirements of the California Clean Air Act of 1988 by developing and implementing mobile source afire pollution reduction progra;s; (5) Whereas, such programs place demands upon the City's funds, those programs should De financed Dy shifting the responsibility for financing from the general fund to the motor vehicles creating the demand, to the greatest extent possible; (6) Whereas, Section 44223, added to the Health and Safety Code by action of the California Legislature on September 30, 1990 (Chapter 90-1705), authorizes the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD} to impose an additional motor vehicle registration fee of two dollars ($2), commencing on April 1, 1991, increasing to four dollars (S4), commencing on April 1, 1992, to finance the implementation of transportation measures embodied in the AQMP and provisions of the California Air Act; (7) Whereas, forty cents of every dollar collected under Section 44223 of the Health and Safety Code shall De distributed to cities and counties located fn the South Coast Air Quality Management District that comply with Section dopt ion of this ordinance; (9) Whereas, the prorated share of Lhe fee revenues for cities that fail to adopt an ordinance pursuant to Section 44243 (b) (3) of the Health and Safety Code shall De distributed instead to the jurisdictions within the District that have adopted an ordinance; )~ 1 Ordiance No, zxx Page 2 (10) Now, therefore De it resolved that, the City, after careful I consideration, hereby finds and declares that the imposition of the additional motor vehicle registration fee by the SCAQMD to finance mobile source air pollution reduction programs is in the best interest of the city and promotes the general welfare of its residents; 8, Intent. This ordinance is intended tq support the SCAQMD's imposition of the vehicle registration fee and to tiring the City into --~~~pY _- ~aq~i~a l:h a Safety Code~~i n~ order to rece i~ve fee revenues for ythe pu rpo se Hof implementing programs to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. C. Definitions. As applied in this ordinance, the following words and terms shall be defined as follows: (1) "City" shall mean City of Rancho Cucamonga, (2) "Mobile source air pollution reduction programs" shall mean any program or project implemented by the City to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles which it determines will be consistent with the California Clean Air Act of 1988 or the plan proposed pursuant to Aritcle 5 (commencing with Section 40460) of Chzpter 5.5 of Part 3 of the California Health and Safety Code. (3) "Fee Administrator" shall mean the Finance Director of the City or his designee. Administration of Vehicle Reg+stra lion Fee. (1) Receipt of Fee: The additional vehicle registration fees disbursed by the SCAQMD and remitted to the City, pursuant to this ordinance, shall be accepted by the Fee Rdministra to r. (2) Establishment of Air Ouality Improvement Trust Fund: The Fee AAministra for shall establish a separate interest-Dearing trust fund account in a financial institution authorized to receive deposits of City funds. (3) Transfer of Funds: Upon receipt of vehicle registration fees, the Fee Administrator shall deposit funds into the separate account established pursuant to Subsection (2) aDOVe. All interest earned Dy the Trust Fund Account shall be credited only to that account. (4) Expenditure of Air Quality Trust Fund Revenues. All revenues received from the SCAQMD and deposited in the Trust Fund Account shalt De exclusively expended on mobile source emission reduction programs as defined in Subsection C (2) above. Such revenues and any interest earned on the revenues shall be expended within one (1) year of the completion of the programs. l_'12 Ordinance No. xxx Page 3 (5) Audits: The City consents to an audit of all programs and protects funded by vehicle registration fee revenues received from the SCAQMD pursuant to Section 40.223 of the Health and Safety Code. The audit shall De conducted by an independent auditor selected by the SCAQMO as provided in Sections 44244 and 44244.1 (a) of the 'r'eal th and Safety Code. Section 2. Legal Construction. The provisions of this ordinance shall be construed as necessary to effectively carry out its purposes, which are hereby found and declared to De in furtherance of the public health. w .rLy. neiiare miu cunven ienCe. Section 3, SeveraDility. Should any sentence, section, clause, part or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of competent to risd fiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to De invalid. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty {30) days after adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of The City of Rancho Cucamonga at its regular meeting held an the , day of _, ATTEST: City Clerk 'Z nE~,EIV~3~4~ CIN n^ c , -l'(y''12 N.t lZ~~'y1 ~L'Gt7C ~/ltil 4~u,,;HO CUCAMUNCA uiN14 t00! cnu•I3~ go? ~ R'~8~9~D~llr~[rli2r3r3r5r6 ~ix~,, ~.i,.q~yisa~,~R. 9i?25= ~ ~~~~~~. YikGt,'.C:G~2ry~/~>~tsiq~-ll~iy/: n /, n~ r `/ ~~j'~Cd rn/ /l/d~AA/iCk° 7Cr~Ql xO~ `/Cc~'aC/GOro. ~~~~p2r~' < eza,vcM«-~~r,/ (F~~ #I ~ ~/ `'~E~a~ Gi.~i..6/GvX4~od~Li0v~ lua~ir xc~rz ;vG'~u'~~L'~=~,i=='~' /ero,a62r~x Ci~t// ,,;(: /tom ~~~ ~G~~,~iti~.2uz- «.~ctL~ ~7l ~1,,:aL~t4sG'lti Ck'k.yrs.Sri,GE%!'~X~'~cn/N~~~`rCva~%rldyy~ .~w'.a~rirc~,. ,,~® ~~/ -~~ Y ~' ~IICG»//-~y~e.~ l1ti//'t~u~~~~y6~7.p~/l.2¢~u.~~.ow ,4d ///Jl~~l' lCl~/~42'h'ahRlp lfi~V~R/62'Ai;~ ~/PL~I~~~iLJ~jy~ ~~L~~~,C~ir~z~r~c7~rw;4G'4~vGOC~U imcz~ .GrnrnL~mlan~irn~•a..~~JCV~dcC~sd-ri~u~ri~, t~urga ~ ~ ~ -~- za,~~~jcu~ ` D ~J ,c ,,/ mlirwinwm. '-ol-,, .- _ ~~~~ ic~ ~b CYiutyYgqx~~•cec~a-~i~,r '~' o~? Grrc~ q~*~oll < `c/r~%G~c~/~~auiGb ~iria re. ~'onr~2c~i,,9~o~/,~tr~i~~'d. ~s Q~~~.~r• ~~Cic~~rf~r~~. `/ ~.~ of tines .~ ~~~~tiG~ ,~/JCHd CUCr4n~lLW'G R Cf~ 4f 73U ~7l~f~ `/6Y- Z437 JS~. ~Qi~^,.0 ~4 L~.',~'~v.~i~ia~~iGn1~/lJar~cu~r ~ a+,i Tune 18, 1991 ti ~'~' s ~'~ To The Members of City Council ~h~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga e~r<1\~}\+~\,D City Hall ru Rancho Cucamonga, California ~ ~, Honored Members of City Council: I am currently a resident of Rancho fti~ramnnoa (ln WoAnncAav na.nn:nn T ___~ _.____o,_ urge you to oppose any change in the city ordinance that currently prohibits recreational vehicles from being parked on the streets, or on private property (forward of the house setback line) where the vehicles can be parked in public view, such as on driveways. The city government of Rancho Ctitcamonga has consistently strived for and insisted on beautiful street scenes by builders and developers. A tough reputation has evolved for the City because it demands quality design and aesthetic appeal. I[ was with pride that I purchased my home here. However, any city, no matter how well designed or how beautiful, must be well managed to stay that way. Laws for the benefit of the City as a whole, must be strongly considered over matters of convenience for a few. It is a matter of "convenience" for the most part For R.V. Owners to keep their vehicles a[ home in [heir driveways or on the street. Owners of recreational vehicles do not want to have to store them elsewhere, or pay for that storage. I would venture to sav that most of them moved into neighborhoods where the tract Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. & R's) prohibited R.Vs from being parked in these locations [o start with! When we allow for this convenience, it results in a cluttered, unkept street scene where R.Vs block views of open space. There is, of course, legal recourse for the homeowner who sees his neighboc violating the C.C. & R's, but the average person does not want to resort to this because of the hard feelings it would cause with his neighbor, not to mention the burden of expensive legal fees which most of us just cannot afford. We therefore rely on our city government to keep out neighbors from infringing on our rights to have an open street scene. It's also duficu][ for people to see azound these vehicles when trying to exit their driveways, and could adversely affect home values on the streets involved. To allow this ordinance to be changed would open up the issue of "What constitutes a Recreational Vehicle"? Suddenly, we may fmd ourselves looking az old cceverted school buses and "home-made" trailers caslstructed of plywood (we have one of those in our neighborhood), and so on. Do we realty want thatfor Rancho Cucamonga?? What will be considered "acceptable" and who will make that decision? It should be realized that even more headaches await the City if the essence of this ordinancex is allowed to be changed. Please stand fine by reinstating this ordinance and give the Code Enforcement staff the authority to er force it. Right now, my street scene is blocked off by several R. V: s in private driveways with the view of the other homes and lanllcranine nhefn~MnA 1'na~<oii T oN to 1M4 0~ rM ciiln ni my rwiel~Me'c nl.l ________r__o _________. ______._o______________________~____o.________ R. V that has not been moved in over a year. I feel closed ia, and robbed of what was supposed to be a street scerre shared by all of the residents of my neighborhood. Certainly this was not the intention of those who phuured this exceptional city. No matter how we look at it, we must not sacrifice the rights of the majority to insure the convenience of o few. Please, I urge you to reinstate this ordinance at the earliest possible time. Otherwise, Rancho Cucamonga may fmd itself without the image that it so desperately seeks. Sincerely, .T~~ June 13, 1991 Planning Aivision City of Rancho Cucamonga P. e. Hox so7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ~_~ Notice of Public Hearing Recreational venicic .^c..,_ ~ ; c*.o raoe I strongly object to any modification to the existing ordinance governing RV parking b storage if it would cause the owners of such RV's to be Forced to move them off their property. I feel moving my RV to other storage facilities would cause less accessibility, less security, greater vandalism, possible loss of insurability and many other inconvenience, not to mention StOYage Cgst6. Somebody figured it out--we have 35 million laws to enforce the ten commandments. The golden thread that binds humanity to itself is kindness. Why can't we have an ordinance to treat others as though we were the others? Sincerely, /7 _ ,, j ~ James R. Hill 9073 Mandarin Ave. Alta Loma, CA 91701 Cnti ~ _ w ,M ~uHi, ~ ,, ~B~p~Wlz~l~:e~g~.~ tip . ~ „ ,. ~~r'~girtai.Foor iluaiity P:anni nq Uiv!si~)n ('~(.. iwz~ tl07 dd r,~;t:o i'ur.lmun4a. ('a. 41779 -:m wrir,ing ;n regards to the public hear: ng scheduled for dune ,'+. .991 rn regarris to the Recreat.ionai Venir;le Park- !ny and Storage Ordinance. t. Gon Bsec, was on the Advisory Commission at the time the orainanre was passed and for very good reasons. 1. ', rregard less of the size of a home. most people do no[ want to sit and look at motor homes or trailers. even ntce onrs--and a Lot. of t;tam are not very well taken care of. 2. ilotor homes arld trailers area traff it hazard as they blucx a motorists view of children playing and cars hacking out of driveways. No matter hnw much you caution •~mir cnilaren, they' still have a tendency to dart out in the ~r ree L. -. The Heuer deae lopments, built in the last LO years, h~n'w n.;r:~rv,: streets and snort driveways. Also, because of !n.~~.:;dth of most lets, pies driveways and mailboxes, [:here is AI:'ead}' Vnry l]Ct .~e rGnm CUf' cars t0 Fdrk On the StCBetS Wrrf'n yell haVB company. Ore ai sr: b~;i ieve rt?ar t/t..gc veh lrJ es, {..+rked in piair. si nht, could be a great temptation co vandalism and urq lacy. There are storage lots where these vehicies would be faiN y safe and not bring the possibility of more crime t.o our neighborhoods. sie respectfully request the City Co keep the RecreaC innal ~S'ahicle Ordinance as is because of the above reasons. Recreational Vehicles should be parked in garages or storage !ota. oc back behinri fences and out of sight. Sincerely yours,/ y t%/.:~1~ ;G~1^~ .b7ilLlt:''„CSY~ ~~~L7 :,nn an;: :;baron i3aer driginal Poor Quali!y ~~ 15E4 _ _ r ':-li3 15 r,rJ _: ~'Et! L ETTEF' ?:; THE FpLUJbJi NG n~~ CIT'i GUiJflC CL ~1E!1EEF.'S. ALL Pl1Ei?L '.Si~PET~ CL!PIh1I SFI ufJERS ':piU tiLl_ ~''~AI'ifi I'iG COM^',1 _,'3'. G°~! NEfIEEF^: r:r name is Irene r, Lu e~~a.no l reside at 7723 Men teu to Ct., Rch. Cuca.n:onga. I support the existing RV Par Y.ing 6r d;nar,r {or the following reasons: .. .. ,. .-.. 't fee; park~ny it -,-, m: dr lve is un{o,i to in7 nsi yh Go^_.~ St is stored rt:or'c the ar: it is used. Hr }ualty :t =F, 4or stor aye" mere than .t•5 appointe - ,-_ .:. d use _s In the ?e era V; sf; Cort:muni ty hcme o!~mers s~yned rCR's which =_*a`._ ,er> cl e;rl>' tt:at Rl'~ 6oat=_ >nd trailers cannot oz =_?Or ed w''. th :,, tha ..pie,, Of the street. I mill yl etll; Supply n __ .gyp=n reque.t. _,~_,;r ^yr =., the .e.?st the parKiny of RV type 'd ehicles =e~;_~ at-:er con qe =_.ti On which .,auses otistucted ai eon v{ _ g-it .e... _ aq .:a; c.. the .,F„~ - =~. de o{ tt._ __.... ~. e -,y .rEi nn re ,~. r.. c* the yc~. -nr, ;., _. r -_ __~~...- .-., .-~d, :anc=. ur: er=_t;nd cnmpl... ,~,. :Our=_. tr:.ll '' ) ~ _ _~ to Irene Luei~ane Y'. ~` ~~ SEPT.30,1990 TO ALL CITY COONCIL MB!®6R6, PLANNING COIpIBeIONBIIS AND PUBLIC BAFBTY CO/NII SBIONSRB, Ne the undersigned rultlenb and homeowners support the Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga Av parking ordinance nn it now stands. Among concerns era the fallowing: street parking congeatlon, vlaunl abstraction of pedestrian tratfie antl the lowering of the aesthetic value of our neighbarhooa. TNANI( YOUI ~erhauLarr naealaadwcr. _. Original' Poor_4 ,;. tio~. ~~~.. " ~~ ..P~-. v~ k~f /~-- -~ ~ GuG ~~ c4ra ~\. '', 9.,,, p l-, ,~1 ~~~~~ S rn .w.~.i ~' a,/~ ~ ~~"~~ ~ ~ amot ~> -~.QQ~C~v~ 7 -, ~ ~ ~-r or~x~a.. coca c-~ n~ ~o~~ ~t°~~. 7740 77`FS Nnltc.a~ ct'- ~-~. 7 7 3 y ,•~ o-rufiec~~ ~~ ~ 02. ~' . 7 % .~ 9 77,~'~o~Ya ,:.r u'~ . „~ii rnantz~;+o et. ~c. 7713 N9~a~+Jetcv^~o !~~ /.• .P. G is~7z ~o~/Y.~~ 767 wm~/~foh Cr'l /Q~ C a~ ~~n~. a. i ~ ~ ~~ ~2' ~ TL~Ry t S,INO AN VII C.(~SOJ .Z S ~K ~y ~u1e.Glrr, Jyla.,.cPaaz~,~. .2s ~-~ -~¢e~.~-.,,_.,,., yl~ at ~P~~- i ~~// 3 a; ~/CL ~ L~je VA~c 3i' i ~ i /~~~~' 0 3 3i ~f-~-~ c~ 3 ~o/ rrss . lC~3 pu /C¢.cc) ~~i70 uct~~ijc. >> a a /y30 7(l7 nrow,lrccza cr. ~.iJ COn~.u4n C.~S'I i50 n. _ •~./ / ~ ~~ 71oz9 ~i-io~cr...6 Gt, 77 ~O ~n.gr 7~ I~,..a. G.~.,...,.~„ ca 9~'tso-GSM,' 7737 rvlt.~wv~s~ Gt °~(tNe/fy a/e,}M eNyR G/} x//730 11+Kr ~GOUN,1w~/IGw i7f. ~o-~+•-ha Cwrcn.....-tid.o.~ l~y.~ll7S~ 7?~X~C'.5~ Qd.~S ~~°I-GA- R~'l3~ JW-10-1?91 1645 FROP7 BERgy CpdSTR UPLpdO TO 99eF230 P.02 ffl",ir~t~rn;rin~ Cemwetton Inc. . 1921 Wan 11th SiroN, Uphnd, CA 91788.3999 SENT SY FAX TRANSMISSION TO (714) 990-6230 PRIOR TO MAILING June 10, 1991 James L. Markman, Esq. MARAMAN, AROZYNSXI, HANSON & GOLDMAN Number One Civic Csnter Circle P.O. BOx 1059 Brea, California 92622-1059 Re: Tacon Pac+tic v Aerr~ ~onetr~c ion Inc Y~ a>t al Oasa Mo. RN 35 7 &ETTLEM6MT OlF6A Dear Mr. Markman: Following this letter by fax transmission, and enclosed with the mail copy of this letter, is a proposed "Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims" that I believe comports with the terms of the tentative settlement we have reached in the above-referenced matter. Essentially, the Settlement Agreement and Release o£ Claims pertains to the "delay" claims in the above-referenced action as well as Berry's indemnification of the City of Rancho Cucamonga against the claims being made by Tacon. Please review the enclosed agreement and advise me of the changes you wish to have us make. (AS you are doing so, please keep in mind that this agreement has not yet been reviewed by Craig Berry and Jack Shultz and it is possible E will need t0 make minor changes.) It`is my hope that we can arrive at as agreement that meets with your approval ao that wa will be able to implement this settlement immediately after we obtain formal action. of the City Council >n June 19. Sincerely, BER TRUCTI N, INC. Randall J. Pitre General Counsel RJP:las Enclosure State License Number 182199 714 1985-9661 F; - 714 ! ~ -~~-6849 SLH-SQ-1991 16:45 FRON BEkRY CONSTF UPLRND TO 9905230 p,03 SETTLIDlCNT AOREEiIENT AIfD RLLSABE OF CIJIIMR // /~~ ~, This Agreement ie made this _ day of June, 19 1, by and ~ ' between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California y/"CITY"), and Berry Construotion, Inc. ("BERRY"), and is made with Fxe€ereace to the Following Facts: II RR(!TTOTR A. On or about September 17, 1987, HERRY and CITY entered into a written agreement for the construction of Reneho Cucamonga Civie Center and Public Saiety Facility (hereinafter rat erred to as the "Project") located at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Civic Canter Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said written contract incorporated by reference certain specifications Eor the Project prepared by John Carl Warnecke 6 Associates ("JCWA") dated July, 1987, as well as eortain plans prepared by oz under the direction of JCWA. B. BERRY ,s contending teat there were nvmerou,. ~nsa.acea, throughout the course o£ performance o£ its contractual obligations to the CITY, where the CITY requested addit ivnal work and changes to existing work that were beyond the scope of BERRY's obligations under the original agreement with the CITY, which additional work and changes caused BERRY to incur costs due to increased job Site overhead, increased home office overhead, and loss of productivity and efficiency. C. On or about Nay 30, 1990, Teeon Pacific ("TECON") filed an action against BERRY and the CITY in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, as Case No. RCV053347 (the 1 JW-10-1991 16 46 FROM BERRY CON9TR UPLAND 70 9905230 P.04 'Action') to recover damages for miscellaneous metal items supplied by TECON which TECON claims were not otherwise properly described ~, within the Project plans end ¢pecificntion¢. D. Thereafter, HERBY tiled a claim against the CITY, and a cross-complaint in the Action seeking indemnification from the claims made by TECON. Aa part of its claim end cross-complaint, Berry reques*ed damages against CITY for delay. E. BERRY and CITY now desire to resolve their differences concerning the TECON claims (and BERRY's claim for indemnification from such claims) as well as BERRY's claim for delay damages, all of which shall be resolved on the terms and conditions set forth hereinbelow. NOw, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foragoiag premises, and the terms, covenants and conditions set forth hereinbelow, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Payment to Berrv Concurrent.Ly with the written execution of this Agreement and as consideration for the obligations of BERRY hereunder, CITY shall pay tv BERRY the sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00). 2. Indemnity re Tecon Claim As consideratinn for the obligations of CITY hereunder, BERRY shall indemnify CITY and hold it harmless from and agaiast alt claims made by TECON in the Action regardless of whether such Claims have been, or will be, made against CITY by TECON or some third party (e.g., JCWA, Precise Erecters, Inc., etc.) where such third party is seeking indemnification from liability for the 2 JLIN-10-1991 16 46 FRON ~f7f2y CONSTR UPLgND TO 9gg6230 p ~ claims made by TECON in the Action. Nothing herein shell be construed as obligating BERRY to indemnify CITY for any claims made. against it by any third perty except for those claims by third parties seeking indemnification from liability for the TECON claims. 3. Release by Berrv 3.1 As further consideration for the obligations of CITY hereunder, HERRY does hereby release, ncquit, and forever discharge CITY of and from any and all claims, liens, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages, casts and liabilities, knoan or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, sad the consequences therefrom, that BERRY has had in the past, or row has, or may in the future have, against CITY that is predicated factually upon any delay in completion of the Project 3.2 Nothing herein shall be construed as a release by BERRY of its claim for any earned but unpaid retention owing on the original contract, outstanding change order items, or other contract adjustment items that do not involve a claim for delay in the time needed to complete the Project. 3.3 CITY acknowledges that BERRY intends to pursue legal action against JCwA to obtain indemnification against any liability BERRY might have to TECON es a result of TECON's claims in the Action. Nothing herein shall be construed in any marnez that limits BERRY's right to pursue JCWA if BERRY elects to do so. However, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring BERRY to continue to pursue any legal action against JCWA if BERRY deems such action is not in its best interests. 3 JUN-10-1991 16:47 FROM BERRY CON97R UPLPND TO 99[16230 P.06 4. Release by City 4.1 As consideration for the obligations of BERRY _ here~inder, CITY hereby releases, acquits, and forsver discharges BERRY, and its principals, ngents, successors, assigns, officers, directors, and employees, of and from any and all claims, liens, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages, Coats and liabilities, known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, and the consequences therefrom, that CITY has had in the past, or now has, or may in the suture have, against BERRY, or any other persona or entities, that is predicated factually upon any delay in the time needed to complete the Project. •------ 4.2 Except to the extent axpreaely stated in paragraph 4.1, above, nothing herein shall be construed as a Yelease by CITY ~ of any claim it may now have, or hereafter acquire, in any of the .r following types of claims: 4.2.1 For any warranty work obligations of BERRY under the original agreement; 4.2.2 Any claim it may have against BERRY for repair of defective workl~o~ 4.2.3 Any claim it may have against BERRY Por any other contractual obligation imposed upcn BERRY under the terms of the original agreement: /,. ~,t~ ~ .efdY//~ ~ y., y. G.Ey t~u;.tr ,j~~~ 5. Miscellaneous .fp~~ ~r- ..rt p~~ 5.1 within 60 days of the da/ate this A reement is s fined, BERRY shall dismiss its claims against CITY that are released by the provisions of this Agreement or, at BERRY's option, it shall apply to the court in which the Action is pending for a 4 !SIkJ-10-1991 16 48 FR011 BEgRY CONSTR LPLgND TO gg062gg p,~ determination of good laith settlement in accordance with Code o! Civil Procedure 5877.6. CITY shall cooperate with BERRY in any .~ application by the latter that this is a good Eaith settlement within Code of Civil Procedure 5877.6. 5.2 This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the statz of California. 5.3 Each party executing this Agreement represents and warrants that such party is authorized and empowered to sign this Agreement on behalf of the entity for whom he or she is signing this Agreement. This Settlement Agreement and Release o! Claims is signed on the data first written above at Rancho Cucamonga, Californis. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA By_ Titl BERRY CONSTRUCTION, INC. By_ Craig M. Berry Executive Vice President APPROV3D A$ TO FORM ALID CONTENT: MARKMAN, AROZXNSKI, RANSON & GOLDMAN By James L. Markman, Esq., Attorney for City of Rancho Cucamonga, California By Randall J. Pitre, Attorney for Berry Construction, Inc. 5 - RANCHG CIiCAI~i'_1tiGA I'fRE PROTECTION I)ISTRSCT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 1991 7'O: President and Members of the Board of Directors ~~h FROM L. Dennis Michael, Fire Chietm . ~ v ~nn~ SUBJECT: MONTHLY L~XYL~NU-~lEG icGrvnTo cvi. ~.,... ~ The following information is provided to assist with clazification of the larger than normal expenditures for May 1991 as presented on the June 19, 1991 Board consent calendar. I. GeneraP FLnd - $732,789 A. One additional payroll period $130,000 B. Final annual truck company payment 66,204 C. Fourth Quazter Dispatch contract payment 62,004 D. Final payment fot workers' comp. insurance 27,789 E. Replacement squad chassis 25,919 TOTAL $311,916 II. Mello-Roos CFD No. 85.1 $128,892 A. Additional payroll period 39,314 T hope this information answers any questions regarding May expenditures. If not, please contact me. LDM/pr 91-125 l;rrx vr' ltavuxu c:u+,:~±ivli!l~sx MEMORANDUM HATE: June 17, 1991 TO: Mayor rnd Members of the City rnnn.i: PROH: Jan Sutton, Dsputy City CUr SOHJECT: ITSH NUHBSR119 OR TH6 ~OMC on the June 19, 1991 City Council Agenda, Item D9 on the Conont Calendar, "Approval to order the vacation of a portion of an allay located west of Halachite Avenue and south of Foothill eoulrvard,^ should have been listed ar an Advertised Public Heerinq. This item wra set for public hearing rt iha May 15, 1991 council au:atinq, and was advertised in the fiend Vallev Daily Bulletin on Junes 7, 1991. This was a clericsl overeite, and staff respectfully requests that this item be heard under the appropriate section of Advertised Public Hearlnq. /m ec: Jack Lam, City Manager James Mnrkman, Clty Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk v