No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/02/09 - Agenda Packet~e i • • • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CU1CAMONGA February 9, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance II Roll Call I Chairman Maaas _ Vice Chairman McNiel _ I! Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 26, 2005 January 26, 2005 Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion A DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC -The review of site plan and elevations for 93 single-family detached homes on a portion of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south of Wilson Avenue along Wardman Bullock Road -APN 0226-102-17 On November 10, 1999, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental a PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 9, 2005 IjANCHo C~'UCAMONGAL review or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent projects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration (Continued from January 9, 2005) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings ~n which concerned ~ndiv~duals may voice their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wait to be recogn2ed by the Chairman and address the Comm~ss~on by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per ~ndiv~dual for each project Please sign ~n after speaking B VARIANCE DRC2004-01289 - JOUD CONSTRUCTION - A request to exceed the 3-foot height for garden walls within the front yard setback along 19th Street in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6700 Inyo Place -APN 1076-381-17 C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medum Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-00052, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from January 26, 2005) D VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase in wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 (Continued from January 26, 2005) VI. NEW BUSINESS E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 • a~ • r1 ~J PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 9, 2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,~ feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from January 26, 2005) VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment trine If dems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 3, 2005, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting perGovernment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga ~~~~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notifcation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission E February 9, 2005 ~. • A • D, E * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • N City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y O R A N G H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE February 9, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC -The review of site plan and elevations for 93 single-family detached homes on a portion of previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 In the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located south of Wilson Avenue along Wardman Bullock Road - APN 0226-102-17 On November 10, 1999, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density Zone range Up to 4 units per gross acre, proposed density 1 43 units per gross acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zornn North - Single-family residential, Very Low Residential South - Vacant (portions of Tract 14759), Low Residential and Open Space East - Single-family residential, Low Residential West - Vacant (portions of Tract 14759), Low Residential and Open Space C General Plan Designations Protect Slte - Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Flood Control/ Utlllty Corridor East - Low Residential West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor D Site Characteristics The subject site Is a portion of Tract 14759 approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 1999, comprising Phase 1 of approximately 65 acres In the northeast corner of that tract The property is vacant and has been rough graded The site generally slopes from north to south and is now devoid of vegetation Additional ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES . February 9, 2005 Page 2 grading work is pending to establish the roads and streets as shown on the tract map, as they will regwre substantial flood control structures over the existing washes to re-align Banyan Street ANALYSIS A General This protect is located within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and includes several particular site and architectural design regwrements A different developer, Lennar Homes, originally planned the subtect site The current developer, Pulte Homes, is providing their larger home product for this phase of the entire tract in keeping with the larger lot sizes in this portion of the tract The other phases wdl introduce a smaller home product The lot sizes in this phase average about 13,637 square feet in area and are proposed to accommodate both single and two-story plan homes ranging from 2,788 to 3,584 square feet in floor area This phase includes the passive-activity park of the three park sites approved with this tract Lennar Homes was regwred to box the mature olive trees for future transplanting into their park areas, however, the trees died Pulte Homes has located mature olive trees as replacements Prior to 1990, a retaining floodwall was erected (extending underground) on the easterly boundary of the subject site to protect the development of the homes on abutting Tract 13566 A 5-foot wide permanent easement for the purposes of maintaining this wall runs along the protect side of the wall The applicant has designed an arrangement that respects the easement and wdl allow access for maintenance by both the new homebuyers and the homeowners in Tract 13566 There wdl be open fenang in the back yards along the 5-foot easement and access across the easement from one end to the other The new homebuyers may not make any improvements on the easement or block the maintenance access by the abutting property owners from Tract 13566 (Exhibit "F") B Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on August 3, and September 14, 2004, and recommended approval subject to finalizing the tree replacement, improving the architectural design elements, and providing architectural elevations along the mayor streets that enhance the streetscape (Exhibit "D") The applicant worked with staff and the Design Review Committee to address these recommendations The tree issues have been addressed including the removal of the easterly property line windrow because of infestation and disease, subject to the standard replacement outside the 5-foot wide wall maintenance easement noted above The olive and oak trees will be replaced in the park areas The rear elevations that face the proposed extension of Wardman Bullock Road had balconies and other substantial features added General architectural quality has been substantially increased as a result of the recommendations from the Committee and staff C Technical Review Committee The Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval D Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on August 10, 2004 Thirty-one people attended the meeting, which included the adjacent property owners to the north and to the east The residents expressed concerns over the remaining eucalyptus windrow and its poor health and had general questions about dust and the Aa PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES February 9, 2005 Page 3 paces of the homes The applicant was able to respond and offer solutions to their concerns After the inspection by an arborist, it was concluded that the trees were infested and diseased The trees were removed and are subject to standard replacement outside the 5-foot wide wall maintenance easement noted above The staff also received a letter (see Exhibit "F") from the neighbors expressing their concems regarding the grading/drainage and the tree removal The Mayor and the Bwlding Official have visited the site to address the grading/drainage The Planning Department also met with the neighbors regarding the trees that were removed and explained that replacement would be a condition of approval E Environmental Assessment On November 10, 1999, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to the protects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2004-00491 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conddions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB VP/ge Attachments Exhibit "A" - Vianity Map Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Draft Resol - Site Plan - Elevations and Floor Plans - Streetscape Elevations - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated August 3, and September 14, 2004 - Typical 5-Foot Easement Solution - Letter from surrounding neighborhood dated December 26, 2004 ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00491 X13 VICIIVI TY MAP N. T. S 1~e ~' r~ A~ ~_- ^~^ 1rW L a~ ~~ ~~< .iLL~ F ~LL O ~~~ ~i ~$ Q< ~ ~a 9 ~ ~ a ST TT T > Y Y Y T ~~ ~8 ~ ~ yy ° ~~ yy Lx yy N~ yy b ~~ Ye~ 8} tt ~~~T ~e [[ iA « xx ZR y*~ ~F r } Q ~ 7 E 7 7 = 7 7 0 7 7 = 7 7 a 7 7 a 7 a 7 = yy R {{ A A ~R 2 R R2 RR q p RA RR 8 8 RF q q RR p p f f BR p tt p «~ gg R~ pp 8~ p p 8~ ~ $ ' a ~ tC ~88 " RE 5 8= " 8^e @~ 78 85 98 ~ $° ' s 8° ?~ ~ ~ a ~ 9~ z s ~ s 5 s ~ _ _z an ~z « ~~ _z zs O tte «A «z a: na aa as as ss sa 9 ~a ~~ ~~ ~~ g~ R 3' a Y T Z >:T : :» : S Z T T: >: SS ST : > YY :: zS TY : T 2 >: :Y Y: L: :T Y ZY :Y T: S> :S TS T T: Y Y: S S YS TT T S k ~ s~ z'aa ~ ~~ ~ l~ ~ s aa ~a a~ ~~ ' ~ ~~ a~ ~~ ~'« ~ ~ ~ ~~ S~ E E~o '«a n~ ."^,k ."°.~ a~ 'a~ ~~ 's'« « 'a~ ~ i~ " o ~e t# ~ S ~ x ~ 7 a7 a7 a7 ~ a 7 7 a 77 aa7 a 7 r7 a 7 aa ~7 77 ac 7 a 7 aa 77 a7 a7 97 a a7 c7 ~7 77 a7 a7 7 a7 a 7c 7 a 77 a7 _ ^ a R p R ap 'R p ~R aR 'R x a ^ ~ ~ " ~ pR aa p ~a _ aR F ap RR a ^ p a aa ^. =~ .W ~~ 3? ~ 5 ~ 5a ~~ ?a ?a s~ ? ?~ ~$ a° a5 5a a^« ~ as 5 a~ ? ? ~~ a"« a a a . ^ R as :s a« a a . c s .a aa :s s7 s a ss 9= ss sa « s a sa eA «~ 8s as 9 ss oa stl 7a stt 77 a sa ce ~« : s a3 «8 « A « 5 "aa e5 ea a"e "a & " aa "s eo o°s ""es 5E 5 x 5c 5a ?$ 5°a a a s e°_ Ea `a3 `so a5 e 5°a 5a 5« 55 ae en `a 5« ~ ~s 6 ? m: aE 3 m 5 ~° = ° O - - - - _ - -- - -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- -0 _ - _ - - ' _ : _ _ 9 R : A A « 8F «R ' A A a RA RR R. ' .° 3: 39 %:. 7 a8 86 7a a a 8e 87 _ u 8 a a 3 Z y S ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ U~ L (/')Z !~ QK s ~ ` W ?~7 VW tr3 ~r.Z Aa5 -17 : g e 0 ~«~ I me y,~s I m': u® .~ ~i3 4 k ~_ ~-~ 3`}~' h o ;... ,~ %" ~ _~ i N e ~~9 ~ 3 "^ VW ~~3' ~? ~a€ ¢ wp:9a QW = g" g~ ~~ 6 1a~Y! ~~ • ~~ yCy ~ d ~ b ~7 ,~ h ~ ~ ~~~ 1 C u QN 3 x W g~ W ~~~ ~ w trb ' i ~ S~•J ~ A ' ~ Ci fl r ' ~ ~ ` ~ ~, i ~ _____ ______ _ _ __~ _T`_____ )8 ~ __ /~f[~ y _,__ _ _ a~~Y[_ P ' a~ ~ _"~ ~~ J l -1 -T ~ ~ ~ ~ L V/ I ., ` l j ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ „® -; •.__ ,j f r, : j ~ J ~ ~, ~ '~ _ , ! . i ~ ~i / ••p~. ;/ y +~~ ~ y f~i j t ~ /~% , t ~ ~ „~, :~; -, _~ ~ ~ ~,. -, ~-~~ ~~ ;~. .- ~- -%~ ,, ~~ ,~. ,~ '' A ~ -- _. ^^ '~ 1, _ - Ra~1~110 SL1ri11111t 00 Rancho Cucamonga, California R'~eq~Wretl~~n1 Stem 3) fb 88 LOt3 ~ Wu Be(M.~E~3rew~r.a P~b~q i.IBVG1kIC~, r,,..a,cwe~ svmyn-n OS1cs Pb,l 11Y - Plm,: ns - PIen3 31Y - PMn ~ - z31L Pbn6 - 2.1 Tar a3a .n I N D E X 1 COVER SHEET 2 PLAN 1 BOOR PIAN 3 PLAN 1 FROM ELEVATIONS PUVJ1 RiONr ELEVAT10N3 6 PINJ 1 SIDE 6 REAR ELEVATIONS B PLAN 2 FLODR PIAN ] PLAN 2 FROM ELEVAl10NS S PlAN2 FROM EIEVATIONS 9 RAN 2 SIDE 6 REP3i ELEVATONS t0 PIAN 3 FLOOR Fl.AN 11 PUW 3 FRONT ELEVATIONS 12 PUW 3 F~L ELEVATIONS 13 PLAN 3 SIDE 8 REAR ELEVATONS 10 PIAN 4 R.OOR RAN 16 RAN 6 RiONl EIEVATION3 10 0./1N•FROMFLEVATIONS lT PLNJ 1510E 8 REAR ELEVATIOP$ le PLAN 6 BOOR RAN 13 PLANS FRONT ELEVATIONS 20 PIAN 5 RiONf ELEVAl10N5 21 PLAN 6 SIDE 6 REAR ELEVAl1dJ3 CITI OF ppNCHO CUCAMONGA NOV 16 ~~ flECENEO - PLp~18 Large Lot Product -Tract No. 14759-1 - RANCHO SUMMIT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~,,,~, ®- ~..k c..~aA..~1.L.. m. r ~ • ,,.~.. ~~.~.. a F1AOR PLAN 278H sq ft -T-~ " LAROE LOTS" P1,AN ONB RANCHO SUMMIT- RANCHO CUCAM ONCA ,, ,,,,,,~„ ~ u.a m...c..waa.. m. ~~R ~~a~@ :t 2~g~ 89~~ 3 ~~ i~d ~~ z o z a a ~ 1 y E i v z • C~ Ago pgp 8 ~ Sy ~~;~ 9Bs~ ~' ~~ ~~ y F O ..t m U g a ~ a .a a ......wi ~ y ..~ ANCHO SUMMIT -RANCHO CUC 6 LOTS' PLAN ONE YvY Crow k Inoclrler Ine o...~ .._.~ ,~ Lefl Elevetlon'A' ~~' 6hfanu' - ~-----ffi-- --; Lefl EhYVetbn S7 •S""gY~ RANCHO CUCA RIgM Eh3vetbn D' e>ava~. RGE LOTS t~ _ _~ - iii Raer Elevetlon TJ' PLAN ONE Y~~Y Lna Y NreI~M~ loe I ~, N ~l3 c a ~ Q Q o; 3 F y Z F a g ~ y 0. S a N r 0 J WI O J ~ U U O S U Z 6 a S 7 N V ~~lO Z a tl ONO WtlJ(1J OHJNtla- 1IWWOS oNJNtla _ OMl Ntl'Id .510'1 aoav~. .~. ~„~~ - ,..,.~. -~. .4 - . ~..... ~. n.. -m. ...~,... .. ~, e..~. B ~i ~~ ~~~~$ i~~~f d a A'/~ O g F 3 z a 9 J y 6 t Y ~~ F - - '~WLL _ - _ - _ _ _r i Left t]evetbn A' ~Fify ahto~e~ - H Le(t ElevaLOn B ~O~fenua Rantlf ..a ~3~ Right F_levatbn'8 Reef Devetbn'R' 1 ---- -S - { ~--- RANCHO C RIgM Elevetlan'C Rear ~evetlon'C V~ Rlght Devetlat t7 Rear Elevetbn D' RANCHO SUMMIT LARGE LOTS P IAN TWO Yvt Crow ! Awacbbc Ine 8 Right Elevetbn'A' Reer Eletatbn'A' tr--- fi I I r IL L{ ~- fr=-= ~~ ~ I ! II ~~ li g~ li u ~}__5 .t19 ¢1 ~ m C = y a v O J W O t J f ,/ I1 u ~/ / S 7 N U Z 6 C ~ ~~ ~_ f~ s B~6 Z ~ Y ~~$ e~ 4 ~~~$@~~~ .# 2~g~ 983 s iy~i: 7~ 3~ E 0 3 D i~18 6 ~~~~~~ ~~~~6~~ r~ ~~;~ 88~~ 1 B °I~ ~~ U ~~ Y < 3 .J d z 0 a U U 0 x U Z Q F_ E F y O ~~ n U C~ ~!9 d- Fe z dp4tlp F~C~SC a P ~~E ~g~,~ ~~B~~B ~~;~ ~~~~ ~f y F 0 a d U C 6 .7 r {~ f 2 U Z a z w ig a ~ U ~ ,t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ££ m ~ y o a d a ~ ~ ~ ~ i m 4~ ~ ~ Q a m a m . ~ i ~,~ ~ == ` i == - ~-~ Irt - - -j T ~ t Q w L Q ~@ 6 W L Q L Q ~@ 6 w L Q i i Y Q Z • • ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ "V ~~ RANCHO SUMMIT- RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~J SECOND PLOOR PLAN ~7RST FLOOR PLAN 1621 cq8 If 1825 y fl roW 31/6kgR "CANOE LOTS" Wrt LAN FOUR k Y~"elrtn Inc 11 rr------Tt T~ ~1 I I E ~~ ~~e ~' ~l~~4~~ .~ B~g~ 68~~ pf @~ ~k 43 N ~~~ ~~~ ~ e z ~ y] ~ y ~0 ~~Q a i ~~C~~~~ ~ !k ~~;~ ~~,~ ~~ y ~ F O m S# U '~ fG J U Z O E U U 0 x u 0 x U Z 6 L' ~aa C~ Y ~.~~:~ ti ,,. ~~~ ~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8 LOTS' PLAN FOUR Y~~k Grm~ ! Y~ocl~t~~ Inc 10 ~~ LeR Elevetbn'B' - Y Left Eievatbn'C 'Gauge [l m ® E .~ Righl Elevetlon'C ~ ~~ ~ffi~ ~ Len Elevetlon V 'Sun~bx^ Right Qevegm 4 UCA RANCHO SUMMIT LARGE LOTB Y~rY Grow i 4wal~ta~ Ine ea~~-~ ~ 1] Reer 9evetbn b mee.na...a~.orrr_~..s.. atirYr~...e PLAN FOUR [~RTORSPdi Right Elevetbn'A' 'Cshfame Rends' Right Elevetbn B tr--- y~L I i ly LL-_- W 9 ~, 3 Z 9 ~ . 6 p yC Sff R t~ iF= ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~a5 W 7, e,+ O 9' ~~ J 4^ v U Z O I 6 V V O S V Z 6 C F 7 y O S U z 6 C .. E O m O C .J Y 9 ~E j~~ a ~~ W e ~~9 ~~~~~~ ~~~@€~@ ~; >- ~, 3 z a < Y 4 p• u 1k 2 ~. ~g;~ ss~l ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ t d GIs 8 ~5~~~~E ~~~~~~~~ y: i~;~ 86~~ r~ '~ ~a~ N f 0 0 r a` "~ Lan Elevetbn C' ~lm® E RIgM Eievetlm'C ~~ RIgM Elevetlon 9' RANCHO SUMMIT LAROE LOTS N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~,,,~,~,,, ~ •..t c.... • e...m.w m. a ~ s • RIgM EleveWn'A' Len Elevenon'n "eeee,.loa/ Rlght Elevetbn 5' ~)•~ V s 1 1 W I L S O N A V E N U E r • CIiY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A NOV 161004 RECEIVED - pie ,,, wrs w n nor a ~m a • A3o DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p.m Vance Pomeroy August 3, 2004 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC -The reviewofsite plan and elevations for 93 single-family detached homes on a portion of the previously approved Tentative Tract Map 14759, located south of Wilson Avenue along Wardman-Bullock Road in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) - APN 0226-102-17 Desion Parameters The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 on November 10, 1999 The applicant is now proceeding with proposals to design homes for the tract The tract will be developed in four phases This current application request is for the phase that includes the 93 large lots in the northeast comer of the onginal tract. The tract is south of Wilson Avenue at Wardman-Bullock Road The pro)ect is located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Under the Etiwanda Specific Plan, this portion of the entire tract is developed under the Basic Development Standards and no specific architectural style is required, however, elements of the existing styles found in Etiwanda are required. The other portion of the tract (not a part of this request) is developed under the Optional Development Standards and the Etiwanda Specific Plan suggests the traditional architectural styles for Etiwanda Victonan, Califomia Bungalow, Califomia Ranch, any other integrated design style meeting plan intent. Staff Comments Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect: 1 The list of traditional architectural styles given in the Etiwanda Specific Plan does not include "Cottage" and "Early Califomia "Staff worked with the applicant to increase the level of detail of each design. These styles have been approved for other tracts within Etiwanda 2 The approval for this tract took into account several issues with trees in the site. Mitigation conditions were set for several cases; however, staff can address dunng plan check a The transplanting of a grove of Olive trees elsewhere on the site. These trees are not on the current proposed conceptual landscape plan b The replanting of Eucalyptus windrows No Eucalyptus replanting is proposed on the current proposed conceptual Landscape Plan The requirement is for 5-gallon trees at 8-foot spacing at a rate of 50 linear feet of windrow per acre c The preservation of the Eucalyptus windrow on the easterly boundary of the protect This windrow is not noted on the current proposed conceptual Landscape Plan d The Coastal Live Oak tree near the northeast of the site is to be transplanted. No Oak trees are shown on the current proposed conceptual Landscape Plan Secondary Issues Once all of the orator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 The Etiwanda Specific Plan requires that at least 50 percent of the dwellings not be plotted parallel to the street The general intent is to break up the typical monotonous rectilinear N pattern by having a great number of the houses sited askew to the street and to each other ~~~ DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC August 3, 2004 Page 2 The siting of many of the houses shows little discernable skewing The skewed houses are bunched together, as well as the parallel houses Intermingling of the two onentations would be best Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planrnng Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. As this portion of the tract was approved under the Basic Development Standards, and Lots 4, 11, 13, 86, and 89 exceed the maximum lot coverage of 30 percent, the size of the footpnnts for the houses must be reduced Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends the Committee review the proposal and provide comments on the design and continue the item for further review Design Review Committee Action: Members Present. Fletcher, Fong, McPhail Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy The project was continued to give the applicant an opportunity to address the following issues 1 Olive tree replacements: Work with staff. The non-fruiting vanety is okay, but it must be the largest available nursery-grown size and placed in a grove setting The park spaces are the best locations 2 Oak tree reolacement• Seven minimum 48-inch box size Oak trees are to be placed m the park areas. 3. Eucalvotus wmdrows• Accepted as presented 4 Model Park: The small houses should not be in the model park or with the large houses Small house models should be with the small lots 5 Comer houses. No small houses are to intermingle in the large lots Use large single-story plans for comers. 6 Dnvewavs No double dnveways Only one maximum 16-foot wide dnveway may penetrate the parkway For split garages, use the "Y" configured dnveway employed on the cul-de-sacs 7 Skewed house olottmp The 50 percent minimum required for skewed house plotting should be fully exhibited m the straight sections of street rather than only one or two 8 Site Plan Show the porches for all plans on the plotting on the Site Plan, espeaally Plan 2 Architectural design The Committee strongly emphasized the need for 360-degree architecture. The side and rear elevations must be greatly enhanced and provided with substantially ncher detail The front elevation features and details should be exhibited in all situations, but espeaally along the rear elevations of those homes along Wardman-Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue An important note was made that either substantial, design- appropnate balconies or an egwvalent substantial architectural feature should be placed on ~3a • DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC August 3, 2004 Page 3 the rear elevations of the homes along Wardman-Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue, but that most should be balconies The Committee made it clear that roofline and roof pitch should show much more vanation throughout all the plans and that vanation m the pitch of the roof truss will be a likely solution Largetwo-story wall heights on the elevations must be avoided ~I33 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.00 p m. Vance Pomeroy September 14, 2004 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC -The review of site plan and elevations for 93 single-family detached homes on a portion of the previously approved Tentative Tract Map 14759, located south of Wilson Avenue along Wardman Bullock Road in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) - APN 0226-102-17 Backoround/Desion Parameters The Design Review Committee onginally reviewed the protect on August 3, 2004 The Committee recommended that the applicant revise the protect to address the identified issues as shown in the attached DRC Action Comments (Exhibit "A") Generally, the Committee stated that a number of landscape, architectural design, and site design issues were not resolved The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 on November 10, 1999. The applicant is now proceeding with proposals to design homes for the tract. The tract will be developed in four phases This current application request is for the phase that includes the 93 large lots in the northeast comer of the onginal tract The tract is south of Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road The project is located in the Etiwanda Speafic Plan under the Basic Development Standards The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 10, 2004, which was well attended The comments were mostly focused on construction impacts, existing easterly windrow health, and real estate questions. Generally, the audience was satisfied with the applicant's responses The applicant has been working attentively to resolve the issues raised at the previous DRC meeting After working with staff, the protect has improved substantially Staff Comments Maior Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. The architectural designs show an improved sense of 360~egree design The applicant, after several meetings with staff, has made an effort to meet the need for ncher architectural detail on all elevations a Plans One and Two consists of single-story homes The expanded detailing on the side and rear elevations includes changes in roof pitch and the introduction of pop-outs and roof breaks The bare wall planes are diminished by the lowered roof pitch and expanded siding b Plans Three, Four, and Five consists of two-story homes A substantial improvement to the side elevations is made by the expansion of siding and the change in roof pitch, as well as the introduction of second-story pop-outs These pop-outs can be improved by the use of bracketing or corbels in keeping with the particular style The revised rear elevations now show balconies, additional pop-outs, and roof breaks, which are benefiaal These new and expanded features enhance the 360-degree architectural quality of the designs The balconies are proposed on two of each the four styles per plan and will only be used on 50 percent of those houses in those styles However, the f~35~ DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC September 14, 2004 Page 2 Site Plan plots all of these plans with the balcony, so it is unclear which 50 percent will actually have them The Committee was espeaally keen on those houses backing up on a street to have this feature c The addition of coach lights on some front elevations is proposed 2 The issue of tree replacement has been partially addressed, but no definitive plan has been offered. a The replacement of the Eucalyptus windrows on sloped portions of backyard areas is proposed and fulfills the requirements of the tract conditions b. The Committee regwred the applicant to replant the Olive tree grove by using the largest nursery-grown and available size non-frwt-bearing trees. The applicant has found 48-inch box trees at a nursery m Anzona The applicant met with Planning and Parks staff and the location of the Olive trees in the parks was discussed Although no conclusion was reached at this meeting, it did appear that a number of planting opportunities were found in the parks that would fulfill the tract condition and also not interfere with normal park design and maintenance needs The key areas were on planned slopes and near boundanes with residential lots m this tract The applicant desires to separate the tree replacement issue from the Design Review process However, important site design issues may linger if the trees eventually do not work in the park environments and must be worked into the protect in other locations. c. The placement of the replacement Oak trees may also be accommodated in the park settings in a similar fashion to the Olroe trees. Secondary Issues: Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. The revised site layout now provides for the interspersing of the required skewed house plotting among the other homes, meets the regwrement for single-story or extra deep setbacks for comer houses, and achieves the smgledriveway/curb-cut for all lots However, the applicant is not completely satisfied with the effect of the skewing and dnveway requrements may have on the marketing of these homes because of the appearance of the skewed homes and maneuvenng m the "Y" configured dnveways of Plans Four and Five The model park has been re-designed to only include the large home plans for this portion of the tract No small house plans are part of this portion of the tract However, no house has been plotted on Lot 28 Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion No outstanding policy issues Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee review the proposal and provide comments on the design and continue the item for further review of an improved Landscape Plan ~3~' DRC ACTION COMMENTS DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES, INC September 14, 2004 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fletcher, Fong, McPhail Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy 1 Olive tree replacements Seventy 48-inch box non-frwting Olive trees (the largest available nursery-grown size) shall be placed in a grove setting in park spaces Other Olive trees shall be placed in the required slope planting so long as they do not interfere Huth the requred Eucalyptus windrow plantings on those slopes. 2 Oak tree replacement Seven minimum 48-inch box size Oak trees are to be placed in the park areas. 3. Eucalyptus windrows The replacement program is accepted as presented For the existing windrow on the easterly project boundary, the applicant must present a report by a Certified Arbonst including a proposed replacement program per the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 4 Model Park: Lot 28 shall contain an example of the large lot product 5 Dnveways No double dnveways Per the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, onlyone maximum 16-foot wide dnveway may penetrate the parkway per lot For split garages, use the "Y" configured dnveway as presented as Option "A." 6 Skewed house Dlotting Accepted as presented. 7 Architectural design• The Committee was satisfied Hnth the applicant's revisions to the architectural design in respect to the concept of 360-degree architecture. The Committee did require changes for the balcony and rear pop-out features as follows subject to City Planner review and approval a The balcony feature on only 50 percent of the rear elevations is acceptable b The bottom of second story pop-out features shall incorporate ncher finished appearance c Revise the Site Plan to show the houses that will incorporate the balcony feature d On those lots with deeper rear setbacks, provide a roof or other architecturally appropriate cover over the balcony/second floor surface ~1 L~ A3~ ~ nYS'.. ~ti;.~~. ~; x{~~~~~ ~~ . x ~ ~ y lb ~~c/ y~ d a ,~M_ .y„ z .9~N / AV R _ --T ~_ __~~_ -- I - , -1_ i ^ I ' I ^ I I ~ i ^ I I O ~~ I ^ I oo ~~ ; ~ a I ~ I I ^ ~ Ij ^ ~ 70 I ~ ~ 1AL ~ j i ^ ~ I ~ PAD=064 ti I I N V FF = O6 90 \v~~J ~ I ^ a ~ ~ i~ v~ I 5 I ~ ~ ~~ m 3 yJ ~ I ~~~~-- I i ~ li I i ~I I ii I J j ~ ,r. r-- ,OZ 98 III ~ M ---- ~ `pry I ___- I I i I /--I-- --r-L---- ------~------- I ~'i7.c~ y~~e G~ t~ ~~F (''J ,~~~~~ '$~ ,r .x ",.r,. ~~~ V O r w `~ .~ ~~ _ tarts ~~ mow. J in ! e ) ! ! 1 / u ! ~ eR -~- - ~ t la la 1 b a JI v v JI b >a J N u n n~ le ~ .__ ® n n ~ IJ u v `.y 41 40 IY U N i 4J ` !! ~ N 1• b n 11 v a 1 M J r b N m n n 11 l ~ G - 41 ~ IJ K 1! ee N el ® Q L M 1) l Y• 01 N W I) N p A 1 f N q ~ JO l __ JI e) 1e el W L L !) ~` 11 Le \p - b \ i l e n `i NIt R y ` ! JI eo m v v N b u Ii ~ ~\ n u v e u n w u ) Q e) I u b M ~` p ! ~• ) b a ~ el 1 ~e \ ! n u \ • n ~ . .~ ~• 6 a J \ 1 ~ n ' 2 ~ ~ v • '~ w v ~ • .~ S. C S \ ~~~` a ~ 10 N A P N •1 F o- D e N N .) + o n _ M ~ N n ,/ u M a v v •° a u A N y O\ ~ •1 i n )1 M v u n A e) ° b e v „ i N p L •1 >r ~ n n N - !1 e) M N N b n N a, ~ Nr fZ C '/. ~`- A38 ~~em~^~t/W-/ ~~ • !+ by ~~f. , ~ ~~ 5756 Johnston Place Rancho Cucamonga Cahfomia 91739 909-899-5750 fax 909$99-5411 ~~~ ~' 2ooa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEC 2 ^ ?~'"''~ cay ~ Ram cuga ~s OHice RECEIVED -PLANNING 10500 Cnnc Center Drnre Rancho Cucanwnga CalAcrnra Dear Sus: We request that the city stop all building at the Puke track behind Johnston Place on the west side and below Summit /Baryon for the following reasons: 1 The trees which were growing behind our homes on Johnston Place were pulled out from an area which we paid for with taxes collected by the Counny of San Bemardrno and given m the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The trees were taken out without ow permission. 3. The bees protected our homes fmm the wind and the sun. 4. We are being dc-prived of the privacy they Provided us. 5. We purchased our homes based upon those trees being there and the birds and wildlrfe they provided. 6. The c~urent grading may cause harm to our block walls. 7. The grading is detrimental to our property. g. The trees that were uprooted were in an easement which we pay for with taxes and is included in landscape District 7. 9. The botanist's report which we were shown excluded the olive trees, pine trees, 5nrit trees and other healthy trees which were destroyed. 10. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is well aware that sprinkler systems were destroyed that provided water to those trees which were in Landscape District 7. We have contacted the city several times but to no avail The City of Rancho Cucamonga has allowed the builder to cause us financial harm, property harm, and destroy our way of life, and this is ur~coeptable. Above are the reasons i have requested a meeting wrth the mayor of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Board of Supervrsors. • ~/ ^ /I l~39 September 10, '1994 1 am a resident of this tract whsch is affected by the Ptilte Homes development- Name 7S7o ~ C11~gs7-~n 1"~4'G'~ - Address ~!/`I/`~ Name ~~v~i sus /c7~'c ~ e Name ame Name %~/ice ~~ , Name Name ~X/ Name • Page 2 ~y~ ~,~,~sra,~ addre~ Address /'YD y5! ~2oST ~ ~ Address Address ,y ~~~ ~~~ ~,~~ ~ _~PC- Address Address .11 ~'~ JaNtisi~,c~ ~~ Address ~J / v • September t0, 1934 rvame v Name /~~n~o h~~~l~c~~ 1, Address - ~~ ~ ._G~- Address ~5~5~9 /~iui"rOX .~,c~ Address A ~-,~ Aaartss, ~ ~M'~`~`4~- 3 ~ Name 58~n ~.h,~r~,~,.,, PL Address a ~~a~ (2c~.ww G~ u:- .r.a~ cc . C! 5~~~`,uc~u~rt~ C`¢ 4l~3`l Address Address Name Address r 1 U • Page 3 ~ ~~ Vii= .{ ~ ;~...,~,.~-. RESOLUTION NO 05-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00491, A REQUEST FOR 93SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES ON A PORTION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT14759, ON APPROXIMATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ALONG WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2~ DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN~ 0226-102-17 A Recitals 1 Pulte Homes filed an application forthe issuance of Design Review DRC200400491, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of January 2005 and continued to the 9th day of February 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occuried B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deterinined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meetings on January 12, and February 9, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at Wilson Avenue, south of the intersection of Wardman Bullock Road and Banyan Street, vnth a street frontage of 1,170 feet and a lot depth of 1,880 feet is presently vacant, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is single-family residential, the properly to the south is vacant single-family residential and open space, the property to the east is single- famiy residential, and the property to the west is vacant single-family residential and open space, and c The proposed residences Nell be placed on lots approved under Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759, which Nall include a park, streets, walls, and landscaping, and 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speufic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located A~-a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-09 DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES February 9, 2005 Page 2 b The proposed protect, together with the conditions applicable thereto, vnll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGnity. c The proposed use complies vwth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts presented in the application, it is determined that on November 10, 1999, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Trail Map SUBTT14759 The California Environmental QualdyAd provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects or minor revisions to protects within the scope of a previous Negative Decaretion 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every cond~on set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~g Department 1) All pertinent conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 99-111 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 shall apply 2) The developer, his assigns, and successors shall respect the 5-foot vwde retaining/flood wall easement along the easterly project boundary • An open fence of a durable, non-wood matenal shall be installed on the project side of the easement in the rear yards of the affected lots, ^ The penmeter and intenor property line fences/walls for the affected lots shall not cross the easement, • Drainage of the surface of the easement shall be taken by the individual project lots without allowing drainage to move across property lines onto the easement, • No gates, fences, or any obstruction shall be placed across the easement, • The easement shall be accessible by the easement holder across ds entire length vnth entrance to the easement from the public nght-of-way at Hickox Lane; and • The developer shall provide each prospective buyer of the affected lots wntten notice of the easement, highlighting the maintenance responsibilities of the drfferent parties, and the regwrements of this condition of approval The wntten notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of a cash deposd on the property and a copy of the signed notice filed vwth the Planning Department ~ ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-09 DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES February 9, 2005 Page 3 3) Eucalyptus tree replacements The Eucalyptus ~nnndrow removed along the east protect boundary shall be replaced with minimum 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees at 8 feet on center per the Etiwanda Specific Plan Such replacements shall be outside and lust west of the 5-foot wide retammg/flood wall maintenance easement 4) Other on-site Eucalyptus wnndrows removed to accommodate the protect shall be replaced wrath new window planting ofminimum 5-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees at &foot spaung at a rate of 50 linear feet of new windrow per acre 5) Olive tree replacements Seventy 4&inch box non-fruiting olive trees, the largest available nursery-grown size, shall be placed in a grove setting in the park spaces and in the slopes Work wrath the City park planning and Planning Department personnel Other olive trees maybe placed in the required slope planting as long as they do not interfere wrath the regwred Eucalyptus wnndrow plantings on those slopes. 6) Oak tree replacement Seven minimum 48-inch box size oak trees are to be placed in the park areas Work with the City park planning and Planning Department personnel 7) Architectural design The follownng is subtect to the City Planner's review and approval a) The balcony feature on only 50 percent of the rear elevations b) The bottom of the second story pop-out features shall incorporate richer finished appearance c) Revise the Srte Plan to show the homes that will incorporate the balcony feature d) On those lots with deeper rear setbacks, provide a roof or other architecturally appropriate cover over the balcony/second floor surface Engineering Department 1) Driveways on the comer lots shall be located at least 50 feet from the intersection before the curb return or the maximum distance allowed by the lot size, to minimize conflicts between the vehiGes fuming right and those baGung out of the driveways 2) For the driveways downhill from the street 6 feet at 6 percent, 14 percent maximum between grade breaks, and 18 feet flat in front of garage, could be 13 feet at 5 percent to flow line [FL], then up 5 feet at 2 percent ) 3) Plot all the drive approaches onto the Grading Plan and label grades in the public right-of-way A~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-09 DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES February 9, 2005 Page 4 4) All pertinent conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No 99-111 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 shall apply 5) Provide a minimum of a 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with the connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The sure, placement, and locetion of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subted to the City Engineer's review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first 6) Pursuant to City Counul Resolution No 8&557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel, or power to any bwlding service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required, unless, in adddion to any and all other codes, regulations, and ordinances, all improvements required by these condtions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one bwlding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by the conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy pnor to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development Environmental Mitigations 1) The applicant shall implement those environmental mitigation measures adopted on November 10, 1999, with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 by Planning Commission Resolution No 99-111 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary C~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-09 DRC2004-00491 - PULTE HOMES February 9, 2005 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannng Commission held on the 9th day of February 2005, by the follovwng vote-to-Hnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r-1 LJ ~~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00491 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR 93 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: PULTE HOMES, INC LOCATION: SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ALONG WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ComoleGOn Date A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _I_/~ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematnre, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval for DRC2004-00491 and _/_/_ Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14759 (Planning Commission Resolutions No 05-09 and No 99-111, respectively), Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan • SC-11-04 1 ~/ ~~ Project No DRC2004-00491 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/~_ • of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and ~ /_ State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~~- submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot sub Department, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 6. Approval of this request shall not waroe compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specrfic Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with ~~ all receptacles shielded from public view. 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~ located out of public wew and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner For single- famity residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 All budding numbers and indnridual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, ~~ including proper illumination 10 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, Penang, and weed ~~ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Cdy Planner rewew and approval pnor to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and pnor to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fenang and drainage devices, in confunction wdh street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i e , private equestrian easements) shall, at a mwmum, be fenced ~~_ with two-rail, 4-inch lodge pole "peeler° logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as ~~_ vetennanans or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora ~~_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be regwred by the Bwlding Offiaal d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail ~~_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at ~~_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fenang 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the /.~_ • Homeowners' Assoaation are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or SC-1-04 /I 7(J Protect No DRC2004-00491 Comolehon Date D. prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwldmg penmts. 13 The developer shall submd a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Cdy Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for commundy concerns, hours of construction actrvdy, dust control measures, and security fencing. 14 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect penmeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work wdh the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protest's penmeter. 15 Construct block walls between homes (i.e , along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durabddy, and design consistency. 16 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 17 For residential development, return walls and comer sidewalls shall be decorative masonry 18 On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The 5-foot walVfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and vngat~on in adddion to the regwred street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submdted for Cdy Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provde each prospective buyer wrdten nonce of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 19 Where rock cobble is used, d shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including au conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be archdecturally integrated wdh the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner Details shall be included in budding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street 2 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior arculation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas SC-1-04 ~~ • ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~- r 1 L_J ~~- ~~- ~~ / / r 1 LJ ~ 5~9 Project No DRC2004-00491 ~. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and vrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3. All prroate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger srze tree per each 250 sq. ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those unds, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This regwrement shall be in addtion to the regwred street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subfect to Cdy Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 7. landscaping and vrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 9. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submtted for City Planner review and approval poor to issuance of budding permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree speaes. 10 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the Cdys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) G. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain . consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be SC-1-04 Completion Date _/~_ ~~_ ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- -/~_ ~~- ~-/. X150 Protect No DRC2004-00491 Comcletion Date considered grounds for forteit H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) I. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following• ~~ a. Site/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, t Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2004-00491) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~~- the CRy prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls ~-/- 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~~- contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2004-00491) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _J_/- shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School - SC-1-04 f~5/ Protect No DRC2004-00497 Completion Date Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwldmg and Safety Official after tract map recordation ~_/_ and prior to Issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Calrfomla Bwldmg Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for requred occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" Instructions. ~~ L. Grading 1. Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance wdh Calrfomla Bwldmg Code, City Grading ~~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~~ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ~~_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~ submitted, and approved by the Bwldmg and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~~_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be Installed on all sliding glass doors _/~ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wdhin _/~_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/~- N. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_J- from frame or track in any manner SC-1-04 ~5a Protect No DRC2004-00491 Completion Date O. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/~~ wsibdity APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-04 7 ~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS January 26, 2005 Rancho Summit Tract 14759-1 DRC2004-00491 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Pnvate Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. a. For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de- sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industnal or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c ~If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect will be calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances For structures in excess of '3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 /7"J 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the requued fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 3 Fire service plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Bwlding permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Regwrement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in•Buildings constructed in the designed Hazardous Fire Areas which include. All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access). 2. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure Fire Lane Identrfication Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fue District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approved Fire Department Access• The approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternatwe Method #5898 must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This protect is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as Hiah Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire Distract The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Hazard Reduction Plans The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A. Fire Area FR-1 or FR-2 regwrements apply to the construction of the buildings based on the slope of the terrain and/or mitigation of the fuel modification plans The development code provides standards regulating and regwnng Fire resistive roof assemblies b Fuel Modification and hazard reduction plans c Fire District access roadways X155 d Fire resistive construction and protection of openings e Fire sprinkler systems £ Fire flow criteria For construction regwrements in the "Hazard Fire Area" refer to the following web site• http://www co sari-Bernardino ca us/landuseservices/DevCode (Chapter 2 Hazard Protection, Article 2 Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District) for an Adobe copy. Also reference RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A 2. Construction regwrements for the Hazardous Fire Area• (This is not a complete list of regwrements and some requirements may not apply to FR-2 Areas). a. The roof shall be a Class "A" fire-resistive assembly approved by Building and Safety. Fire- retardant Class "A" wood shakes and shingles shall be listed to comply with the 10-year "natural" weathering test. Class "A" roof assemblies shall be installed in accordance with their listing and manufacturer's instructions. b. The space between rafters at the exterior walls shall be solidly filled with tight-fitting wood blocks 1-1/2 inches thick. The eaves may also be "boxed" c. The exposed surface of exterior wall must be a part of a listed one-hour fire resistive assembly d. All exterior doors must be of a solid wood core type. Dual pane glass is regwred for all glass in doors e All windows and sliding glass doors shall be constructed of dual-pane glass f Cantilevered or standard type decks shall be constructed in accordance with one of the following: i A minimum of 1-1/2 inch lumber for all the framing and any deck materials n Protection must be provided on the underside of the deck by materials approved for one (1) hour fire-resistive construction ni. Be of non-combustible materials, as defined in the Bwldmg Code. g. Patio covers attached or within 10-feet of a residential structure shall not be constructed of materials less than 1/2-inch in thickness Plastic, bamboo, straw, fiberglass or wood-lattice less than 1/2-inch in thickness are not permitted h All regwred fences adfacent to fuel modification areas or wildland areas built as conditions of approval shall be of non-combustible materials as defined in the Bwldmg Code Any fence within 10-feet of the fuel modification area or wildland area shall be non-combustible, Beyond 10-feet, the fence may be constructed of any approved material All other fences, • including those on the interior of the project are not subject to this requirement 3 ASCO i. Roadways shall be provided along the protect perimeter exposed to a fire hazard or fuel modified area. The roadway is to allow fire district vehicle access Such roadways shall be a minimum twenty (20) feet in width, with a grade not to exceed fourteen percent (14%) and capable of supporting fire fighting vehicles 3. Fuel Modification Reqwrements The applicant shall prepare fuel modification plans for the site m accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Department's Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines and RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A For the fuel medication plan requirements, refer to the following web site: http•//www lacofd org/forestry%5Ffolder/gdf/fmpp pdf A The preliminary fuel medication plans shall i Show all property lines, contour Imes and locations of proposed bwldings or structures. n. Show the 100-foot defensible space for slopes less than 15%, for steeper slopes and larger defensible space may be required (Per RCFPD Ordinance 39, Appendix II-A) around the structure ui Show each fuel modification zone (setback, irrigation method, thmnmg and interface thmnmg). iv. Show existing vegetation impacted by the regwred fuel modification and proposed vegetation to be planted m the fuel modification area, if any The preliminary plans should be sensitnre to rare, threatened or endangered species and the applicant must be prepared to address their disposition m the final plans v. Include photographs of the area that show the type of vegetation currently existing, including the height, density and relationship to grade. vi. Describe the mechanical or manual methods that will be used for the removal of the vegetation to comply with the fuel modification plans wi Describe on the plans the existing structures, natural vegetation, roads, parks and/or green space 600-feet beyond the site or development property Ime m all directions. State on the plans who will have ultimate responsibility for maintenance of the fuel modification zones. The applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures. B. The final fuel modification plans shall• Clearly indicate each fuel modification zone (setback, irrigation method, thinning and interface thmnmg). Also indicate locations of permanent zone identification markers 2. Include irrigation plans and specifications 3 Include the landscape plan The landscape plan must identify the location and type of supplemental plantings The plans and speafications shall include both the common and botanical names of new and existing plants within the fuel modification area. Clearly indicate on the plans the disposition of impacted existing vegetation and identifying those proposed for retention All groundcover, shrub, plants and trees are required to be fire-resistive in accordance with three (3) published references for fire . F~5 ~ safe vegetation Refer to the following web site http //www ucfpl cuop.edu/FMI- Zone XIV pages 168 to 177 htm 4. Indicate any special or specific landscape maintenance intended for the site such as pruning, "lambing up", mowing, etc 5. Describe the mechanical or manual methods that will be used for the removal of the vegetation to comply with the fuel modification plans 6. Describe the existing structures, natural vegetation, roads, parks and/or green space 600-feet beyond the site or development property line in all directions. 7. Note the names, addresses and phone numbers of the responsible parties for the maintenance of the fuel modification zones 8. Include on the title sheet the conditions of approval, CC&R's and/or any deed instructions related to the site or final fuel modification area Include a copy of the approved preliminary fuel modification plans with this submittal. 9. Provide a copy of the proposed fuel modification maintenance documents to be recorded. The maintenance agreements must be perpetual in the event of property transfer and/or a change in Board of Directors for the Homeowner's Assoaation. 10. Indicate that the developer will implement the required measures of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District, before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect. Fire Construction Services must be summoned for an on-site inspection and approval pnor to the issuance of the building permit. 4. Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated egwpment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Speafic fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to. a. A stand-by water tender, egwpped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services pnor to cutting, welding or grinding work. e Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a . preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced in wtldfire hazard mitigation planning 5 A5S Prior to the issuance of a budding permit, the developer shalt have submitted and obtain approval of a final fuel modification plan Further, the builder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel • modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subject to an on-site inspection Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan regwrements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Regarding Fuel Modification Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have review & approved an alternate method The approved form & Pulte's commitment letter dated January 26, 2005 must be reproduced on the plans submitted to Budding & Safety for plan check Chronolooical Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following pnor to the issuance of any building permits 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections. All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delroenng any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of aA new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3. Fuel Modification Plans. Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements 4 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 6 ~~/ 5. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6. Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. Access Control Gates• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8. Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit 7 f~lOo parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9. Address Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 10. Fuel Modification: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. 11. Hazardous Materials. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subfect budding or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 13. Mapping Site Plan: Pror to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. ~~ Feb-O7-05 11:47ee frorAwriqueet Mortoose +714-834-468L T --- ==T=082=TOOt~il9t=~f=t5a =- -- February 7, 2005 Planning Division, City of Rancho Gucamonga PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 9]729 Dear Plaaaing Commission: This letter is concerning the conshuction of Pulte Homes is Rancho C'acamorga. My concern is not only the F.aseman. I have an issue with the type of homes to be built in our area of Rancho Cucamonga (Edwanda) by Pulte Homes, Inc.. Our an~e of'zomes are not Track Homes. Pulte Homes will be building track homes slatting in the low $400,000.00 with no upgrades. This H not acceptable. I am really stttptised that the City Planning Division of Rancho would allow something like this to happen in an area of Rancho where there are no track hom~:s and the selling price of our homes are a lot more than $400,000.00. Also, how can you the City Planning Office give Pulte the okay to cur down all the [rev's that sat on the easemaa and build on the easetnan when in fact it doe: t't belong to you. Some of us have clearly proven some of the properties have five to ten feet of easemari. George Ashley 14049 Hickcox Lane Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91739 c~ d~ ~~~t~~ cuca~roN~a va Fax: s~a9-~ir,~-zs;~a-r Frabr.:ary'r, 205 FEB U 82005 RECEIVES -PLANNING Tlve Plz,nrriny r;.cxT mission of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga 1USC0 Crwc Ce~nler Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: DE511'aN RE'r/IIE'uV dF:C2004-00491 - Pulte Homes, Inc. Dear i~lannrng Corr.missr~rn: wauid hlce rr+y convn^~ents and concerns to be heard on this matter of regardmg the Design Review DRC2:104-A.;~491 Please allow me time in front of the Planning Commission to address rry corn~ms cn .he appr;val of this potential development. ff you have .any g~estiorrs or have further inforrnatron regarding the public meeting, please a;ntad me on my <eallular telephone at 310-739-5302. /~~ $arn~a I. ~IQf~:~S F{i~tt 5i~) Johnstor~FNa.e `'~ an~ho C.uarn~t~,c ea, CA 91739 T d ES35-bL~' rOTEI zaazH sa~oTd e~pueS dOZ~TT 50 LO Qad Irving Y 8~6'ter Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Cmc Center Drne Rancho Cucamonga Ca 91730 Via Fax 8 hand Delnrered Re Desgn Rewew DRC2004.00491 - Pul6e Homes Inc Dear Sns RECEI~%'rr - Pl APINING I wish to review the following problems at the speaal heanng on February 9, 200.5 1 loss of vend row and damage caused by that 2 Removal of Trees and damages 3 Drainage problems 4 Easement problems 5 Setback Problems 6 Enwronmerrtal habrtabon and eoobgu;al system damage 7 Neglect problems rery, Y Berliner 5756 Johnston Place Rancho Cucamonga Calrfomia 91739 90999-5750 fax 909-899-5411 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiU10NGA February 8, 2005 F E 8 0 9 2005 Rancho Summit Design Review Meeting Coleman, Dan Page 1 of 1 From: Pomeroy, Vance Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 8 45 AM To• Coleman, Dan Subject FW Rancho Summit Design Review Meeting Re DRC2004-00491 -----Ongmal Message----- From: Kevin A. Doyle [mailto:wanthealthywindrow@earthlmk.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3.25 PM To: Pomeroy, Vance lt: John Cermak Subject: Rancho Summit Design Review Meeting Good Afternoon Vance, I have noticed the final design review meeting for Pulte'e Rancho Summit project is on the City agenda for September 14th It has been nearly one month since Pulte representatives held the public presentation regarding their prof ect to property owners in the immediate area and it should be noted we have not heard anything further regarding the diseased eucalyptus windrows I'd like to ask you if you can tell us if there is going to be any action taken to correct the damages my neighbors and I are experlencing~ Is this issue an item for subject meeting I am in discussions with an attorney regarding what possible actions we, ae affected property owners, might take to help this process along and get this issue resolved Having heard nothing from Pulte representatives as they promised, i/we would like to know the City's stance before we proceed further Sincerely, Kevin Doyle 5914 Johnston Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 909 463 1857 17 /77/7nnd Rancho Suminlt Community Meeting Page 1 of 1 Coleman, Dan From• Pomeroy, Vance Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 8 45 AM To• Coleman, Dan Subject FW Rancho Summit Community Meeting Re DRC2004-00491 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin A. Doyle [madto:kdoyle2@earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 8:34 AM To: Andrew Schumaker; Bnan Hardy Cc: Pomeroy, Vance Subject: Rancho Summit Community Meeting Good Morning Andrew and Hrian, It was a pleasure to meet you at last evening's community meeting during which you presented plans for Rancho Summit. Thank-you once again for taking the time to discuss your project and take questions. As one of the concerned homeowners on the eastern flank of your property, I would like to ask you to keep us informed of your plans/actions regarding the damage from the diseased windrow eucalyptus trees that we are experiencing Df special concern is the result of today's meeting with the city that was referred to last night relating to the topic of landscaping and condition of the windrows. My neighbors and I look forward to hearing from you on this subject along with watching with interest as your development progresses I believe we all hope for its ultimate success combined with minimal negative impact on our existing community To that end, we intend to remain engaged in the process and in touch with you and the city With Regards, Kevin Doyle 5914 Johnston Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 909 463 1857 / ' 12/27/2004 t .~ rSs#~ yr s§s,t+ ~wymaw~ '~ ~~~ ~! ~. C?~_ ~' _ ~ _ ~~ r `c'! ~ .~ ~ ~l ~ ~ /•i~, r ° ^ ' ~~ - _ 1 ~_ .~- r5 _ ~=~,-r ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ o ~ ~ ~---~~. ;ter .~ . < "' a . ~~~ -~ ~ _ , ,, J i ~ a o f J.. .: ~ o ~C ,ice ,/ I } <~~ ` .a.~ '~ ~ .4 ,•, _ i ~, U~~'~~'~,~~° - -- °~ _~x- ~ ;_ ~ 4 ^ _ ~ '~ _ __a...~ y1 Wa M1• w +{ Y• - _ ~~ `, - _.~ -~ ~ ..._ '~~;- '~ ~,,, -, 5 ~~ "W. i Ai~Y~ _~_~~-` __ \ - ~ r ~ ~ 9 ~ ,'~` ~ ~~ n ~. ~, -.~ '~ _o _ - ~ __ ~'~'"" s ~ ACT ,T ~ r e ~ c ,: ._~ ~` .~ 4. 1~ C5~ rr ~ i\~ •~il'0 ~ ~ ~_ J< ~~. l~ T J ,n. • Al %~ ' ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ , ,~'F a'. r s ~ t i~ O 1 - ~ F~ • ~. ~ ;f •~ ~~ ~`ktf~~ `d ~~ G~ sv , ~.•. ~ I ~7M\! ~ ' , ~~~~ .. _' i Y , ~G ~,, s 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.a !¢ . A ii ~ ~j~';l`~ '~ ~~ ~qyt.~, 9 L~ t~.u\ ~iYW L~ 'Y.2 tic!. ' ~ • T H E C I T Y O F R A N G U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE February 09, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT• VARIANCE DRC2004-01289 - JOUD CONSTRUCTION - A request to exceed the 3-foot height for garden walls within the front yard setback along 19th Street in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 67001nyoPlace-APN 1076-381-17 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. The applicant is in the process of constructing a single custom home on a lot that is the former model home parking lot for Tract 12952 Following the completion of the tract, this lot was sold for the purposes of developing a custom residence on the lot In 1992, Variance 91-12 was approved fora 6-foot high wall on the same site for a custom residence that was never constructed The current request is similar in setback and design to the wall approved in Variance 91-12 The site presently contains a custom residence that is under construction and a number of mature trees, primarily along the west property line The site slopes gently from the north to the south at an approximate 2 percent grade ANALYSIS' A General The layout of the site dictates that the front yard setback be applied to the property running along 19th Street and the corner side yard setback for the property running along Inyo Place, however, the front door and garage of the new residence face Inyo Place to relate to the existing homes to the south Without the requested Variance, the wall would need to be 37 feet off the curb face along 19th Street This would leave the residence with very little private yard space or buffer from the traffic noise along 19th Street The applicant proposes building a 3-foot high wall 5 feet off the back of the sidewalk along 19th Street, transitioning to 11 feet off the back of the sidewalk along Inyo Place B Technical Backpround• Development Code Section 17 02 140 defines the front lot line as the narrowest frontage of the lot, regardless of house orientation The 19th Street frontage is shorter than the Inyo Place frontage, and the final map for Tract 12952 did not designate othervvise, thus, the 19th Street lot line is considered the front lot line. Therefore, structures, including walls in excess of 3 feet in height or landscaping, that ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01289 - JOUD CONSTRUCTION • February 09, 2005 Page 2 block views for safe ingress/egress cannot be located in a required front yard area per Section 17 OS 060 K1 of the Development Code. In the Low Residential Distnct, the minimum front yard setback in which structures, including 6-foot high solid walls, can be constructed is 37 feet from the face of the curb The current Site Plan (see Exhibit "A") shows the wall at a minimum 5 feet behind the sidewalk along 19th Street, Vansitioning to a minimum 11 feet behind the sidewalk along Inyo Place. The added setback is needed along Inyo Place in order to allow safe ingress/egress from the applicant's driveway. The applicant proposes that a short section of the wall at the northwest comer of the site run adjacent to the curb, in order to protect an ewsUng mature tree C. Compatibility Issues: In reviewing the proposed Vanance, the issues of compatibility of the 19th Street streetscape Vestment should be an important consideration. The attached photographs (Exhibit "E") show the existing wall setback condibons at the intersection of 19th Street and Inyo Place. Currently, acurb-adjacent precision block wall runs along the south side of 19th Street to the west of the site. The balance of the adjacent 19th Street frontage was improved as part of Tract 12952, including a slumpstone block wall with pilasters and decorative cap. The lots to the east of the subject property back-up to Inyo Place, therefore, a slumpstone block wall faces the subtect property. Staff has advised • the applicant to design the wall with consistent wall treatments and landscape palette similar to the treatment provided by the developer of Tract 12952. The current Site Plan indicates that the appliatnt proposes to build a wall that matches the treatment used for Tract 12952 Conditions to ensure consistent wall treatments and landscape palette are included within the attached Resolution of Approval In staffs opinion, the current proposal with the attached conditions Hell provide a logical continuation to the sVeetscape along 19th Street and Inyo Place. Facts For Findinps• In order to approve the proposed Vanance, the Planning Commission must determine facts to support the following findings. Any findings in the negative would precude approval of the Variance Request: 1. Findin That strict or literal interpretation enforcement of the specked regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of this code. FacUs Placing the wall at the required 37-foot front yard setback would leave a large part of the applicant's front yard physically cut off from the house, creating an area that is impractical to maintain and difficult to safeguard, and 2 Findin That exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone FacUs The subtect property is the only corner lot in the vicinity which is orientated • toward Inyo Place; and ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01289 - JOUD CONSTRUCTION . February 09, 2005 Page 3 3 Fmdina. That strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties m the same zone Facts. The orientation of the applicant's residence towards Inyo Place practically makes his front yard into a side yard, thus limiting his ability to shield the house from the vehicle and foot traffic along 19th Street, and 4. Findin That the granting of the Variance with not constitute a grant of speaal pnwleges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classfied in the same zone. FacUs: The other properties m the surrounding area are not orientated towards 19th Street; and 5. Findin That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvement in the vicirnty Facts: The wall will be similar in design and setback to the existing walls at the comer of 19th SVeet and Inyo Place CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Variance DRC2004-01289 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Draft Resol - Site Plan/VVall Exhibit - Applicant Variance Request Letter - Assessor's Map - Approved Site Plan for Variance 91-12 - Photographs ution of Approval for Variance DRC2004-01289 ~~ W tr `• !C~ tk,~ C-c ns~' Cc~ ,7ov .C~r° P~ ?cnGlrc Cucamor~a ~ C!g 9x737 jsl-71~~-~7a-3 ~S 1Court,~, ' //j . .. /' ` ~ny~ 1'~ ' S p 1 ~}f ereu 5 ~i ~ -1 °~' c.ar `,fin be N' 6~ x~~ t;,, /~i sow ~ur4rr tZ''h"~ 1 saw ~ r f3~~`` ~~, on ~ bJ ! - -- - 3°l~ N EXHIBIT `A' ~C.~~~~D~~g9 Joud Construction Company 1485 Pomona RD # G Corona , CA 92882 (951)734-2723 TEL (951)734-5405 FAX Dear Sr ,Madam I am the owner of this property on 6700 Inyo PL in Rancho Cucamonga ,and I am building single family residence for myself ,and because of the shape of the lot I am going to use my side yard as a backyard ,and in order for me to do so I need to secure the property Ime by proposing to build(6 feet block wall) on both sides of the property on 19th ST 8~Inyo PL to prevent dangers and secur my house and my family and give them mor privesy, and I am planing to put a pool in the future . The block wall I am proposing is going to match the existing block wall on the other side of the street attached photos to show the other comer of the street, and it is going to be very compatible with the surrounding area . thank you . EXHIBIT `B' a5 ^ I a °' 'a v w i ® ~l , '9419 7 Ilya - - w r r~ \HI 70 21 ~ ~ m ~ i I ^'® $ R a * , • ® R _ R _© I ~ IB ~ 6 a b .LY~ ~ i 'fie i 6 2 la.a ^ ~ Y p .e*1 `~1 , ^ nf.w to I ^ ®~ /' ,~4 I $ I 4~ a l a q'P a,p ]a i7"- ' P .. 'y w.b ~ ', s ~\• tl ~ 6 44 I © a , . •a a n.a \ , , ~I p r- .' 9 •3 P-Ia ~ 1 \ 15 +,I / _~_-_.-~'~ ` b4 4 lam' `f Q ry:a ~ ~ d ~4Q 'f • av axv : n-v nn I6 d p` 6~ _ ~'' '' I~ 1:1~ /'• R 1 ~ s ~ - ~ oT ~t•6 O .4 ~ I ~ 12 Q ~ - 28 9 _ .~ ^ 29 91 ms trf p \~ ® m e + m ' 11 O / B 1 asw acv a as wn a-a s,.1N ~ a M 4 r. 1s` (I /'' ~ •4 e q.q a.la v.w : as 43 ~ O ~' 10 ¢ ® db 6 37 $ ~ mp {I ~ u ® Q a 1 ~ p ~ t~ `°, ~ ' d„ ®'44 d'lgbi A ® R ~ ® u © is p ,/ 9- R } 7~` p^d ''GG ~~ ® 94 F a1-• - - i - a O V - asp 4 1. ~ , B // sly" 1a a q _ ~a 1 as /' P A ® g,4R 0 ~ b I -------~--~ ----~--~- .+a q-p 2® a>D '' a ¢®It4 10 ~ ^ ~ i a c I r^0 a a asa a.a °' - ~ ® 3® n ~. ~ ~ ~°® I as B~ P*nl la c~L~ ^ II• 7r;°' 6~'6 ^ ^ !"L'Y,Y~~\. ~': r~ 4 m.a '1~AYBA£ I II b, ai< a 10 9•,r~Q+ 8~ I ^ ^ ~ Lh 7~1%~~P~ 61 B \ 13 k R a\a q ' -ate sa ap n ^ (''h]t~ Q ^ a • aY•1M ' ~ _~- ~ ,a. • s In ~ d~'fu®~ ^~ ~ ® ®~ '®S ~ __ ___-__ I u B ® ,fi V ~ S Iwn \fn nr~aa lau aaa u n q Ia I t7 8 28 Apr a I a '4 19 - S I ~ a.a b .\9 11 I tf ~ ~ ^~ ~ S 20w p a 178 9 ~ R ~ 5 ° .L f !! c; + 9 ~ It ~ - ~ ~ ® ® I 2 It ~ p n 121 - 26 e a ~ I ,R{ .~ ~ n a I la q !0 R i • 8 au Y I n.u I qm { •m I qa r---_ ___ a i 31 21 a.n I a.n a \ a ® I a I n I R I a ® a ® a.a ~ a.o ®16 G ~ ^ C 7 I1 ; I ~ I] 20 ~ II ? 11 44 sl 4Q -J y 9 I Isu la ^ 11 ~ a-;. J I In i] f n ++Lss 87 ® 9 ' 0 ~ 1z 22 ~7 \. lJ I fr Z`. a ~ _ ® IB a I2 2 ' °` ~ ' 2{ u a r q I ~ I R ® g^ aa•~~` ua Q^ ® sea eq ~ ~ a. I ~ eb J9 d ® ~- ^ ® 1{ ^ I n 4' a i a.a a.a ~na.a. u.a b a' a 9a ,p tf ~ tS® ^ I ^ © I R R s n ~ ~ 11 18 27 •• I d Sa 2 \ n.a ~ s a s ro 4 I d• p q a d yll i_ _r(pL ~~ I aJa a.]f ~ I .q u n 4 1 q a] n q 4 I q ]w.~ 0•I .O w. ~° OF q a~ _-_--_1-_-AygZ.E p~e_-__~__~6fk____-__,L____ Y \ L ®9 ~ ~ ~i+- a+I R q q q ,aql, q q 4 I a u n o n n n n n. N:14'F. F'-' s la ® ® ® ®R ® ® 0 ®V' v 8 q f' ~ I `41 17 i 1] ©a 11 I ^ 8 .p.~ I C ~ B ®B r a 8 26 27 ^ ~ R ~ A ~ 8 S R s c ]u i Iu ^8 _ 87 ? 88 ^. ~ ~ as a s -- am d 7 of m R 18 n a o ua O a n a' IA r ~ S ® yj n. 'F ul a sf s2 ° 1 3 a l a ,a 8 0l e I a as is /o ~1~\\,' Q fE I ~4 .a 9 p o 4 p Xtr~bX Assammorb flap /1~ Ci. Ptn. N.W. I/4, Sec. 36 Book 1076 Page 35 /I i.l N., R.7 W. San Bernerdlno County N Per it/cf Xa 11606-7, Y 8 188/1-4, sEat 1988 Por Itlct X/ 11606-8, Y B Ib8/6-6, EXHIBIT `C' 8~ _4 ~ ~'~ L +~M ys ~9 1~ N • ~o /At ~ ® a. ~~ ~~ ~% ? . ~ $ b ~ ~ ~ R~~~ a a~ ~~ ~ ~L M }e {! 9 i -r x F~ = a.'w w I~ T i ~If~ ~d ~ .' _~. V*µ r :~' •~ .. n f~ ~~ ~~ C~KKK f~ ~ " aF R ITEM: V~/~twnG. 9!-/~ ~I'IY OF Fes' 1~~~i:~ UCAMONGA .~E: 5~+~ Alah ii _ .~ EXHIBIT `D' ~- EXI-IIB1T: c scALE: N Photo 1: View of subject property from 19th Street sho~r~ing house under construction. Photo 2: View of Inyo Place intersection with 19`h Street showing existing walls behind sidewalk along east side of Inyo Place. • 1~ t. 'mow °s-, , - _ _ „ _ .. Photo 3: View of existing mature tree at northwest corner of site, wall and sidewalk along 19`" Street, with subject property to the lefthand side: Photo 4: View of sidewalk along 19`° Street with subject property to the righthand side. r~„1 J Qq . RESOLUTION NO 05-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004-01289 FOR A REQUEST TO EXCEED THE 3-FOOT HEIGHT MAXIMUM FOR GARDEN WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK ALONG 19TH STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT67001NY0 PLACE,AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 1076-381-17 A Recitals 1 Joud Construction filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DRC2004-01289, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 9th day of February 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 Alf legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hen;by found, determined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct Z Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on February 9, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together month public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located of the southwest comer of 19th Street and Inyo Place with frontage of approwmately 50 feet on 19th Stn;et and frontage of approximately 140 feet on Inyo Place, and presently inGudes a residence under construction, and several matures trees, and b The properties to the north, south, east, and west are ewsting single-family residential subdivisions; and c The project proposes the construction of a solid 6-foot decorative block wall at an average setback of 5 feet off the back of the sidewalk along 19th Street and which encroaches into the required front yard setback by an average of 24 feet, and d The north property line (19th Street) is considered the front property Ime per Section 17 02 140 of the Development Code, and • e The Engineering Department Driveway Policy prohibited this property dnveway approach along the front (19th Street) property line, n;quinng the dnveway to be placed within the comer side yard, along fnyo Place, and ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-10 DRC2004-01289 - JOUD CONSTRUCTION . February 09, 2005 Page 2 f The project as proposed with all applicable conditions enforced, wik continue the existing streetscape treatments utilized in the immediate area by providing an upgraded wall and landscape treatments, and g The 19th Street and Inyo Place frontages to the east of the subtect property are developed with slumpstone walls, and h The proposed wall would be a logical continuation of the exsting 19th Street streetscape treatment 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presenfed to this Commission during the above-referenced publrc hearing and upon the speGfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows. a That strict or fderaf interpretation and enforcement of the speaf~ed regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship rnconsistentwith the objectives of the Development Code, in that placing the wall at the required 37-foot front yard setbadcwould leave a large area of the applicant's front yard physically cut off from the house, creating an area that is impractical to maintain and difficuk to safeguard, and b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, in that the subtect property is the only comer lot in the viankywhich is orientated toward Inyo Place; and c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, in that the orientation of the applicant's residence towards Inyo Place practically makes his front yard into a side yard, thus limiting his ability to shield the house from the vehicte and foot traffic along 19th Street; and d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, in that the other properties in the surrounding area are not orientated towards 19th Street, and e That the grenUrtg of the Variance will not be detrimental to the publrc heakh, safety, or welfare or materially rnJunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, in that the wall will be similar in design and setback to the existing walls at the comer of 19th Street and Inyo Place 4 The Planning Commisson hereby finds and determines that the protect rdent~ed in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Ad (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below • and in the attached Standard Conditions LJ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-10 DRC2004-01289 - JOUD CONSTRUCTION February 09, 2005 Page 3 Ptannina Department 1) The speGfic wall design, matenal, and landscape treatment for the 19th Street and Inyo Place streetscape areas shall be designed to match the treatment used by the adjacent Tract 12952 2) Landscaping shall be planted between the wall and the sidewalk to the satisfaction of Cdy Planner Enalneerinp Department 1) The proposed 6-foot block wall shall not block the "Une of Sight" for northbound Inyo Place Traffic 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Secretary t, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of February 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS a~a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN= DEPARTMEf~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-01289 SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: JOUD CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: 6700 INYO PLACE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Coin letlon A. General Requirements 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its ~-J_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the aRematlve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 Variance approval shall expire If building permits are not issued or approved use has not ~~_ commenced wdhin 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include ~_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Flre Marshal regulations have been compiled with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to • occupancy SC-11-04 1 8~ 3 Project No DRC2004-01289 Completion Date i • 3 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~_/_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 3 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 5~-,-04 i ~planning\final~pingcomm\dre2004-01289std cond 02-9 doc2 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE• February 9, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Llne Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etlwanda Avenue - APN. 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Development Review DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medwm Resldentlal District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etlwanda Avenue -APN• 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58. Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase In wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medwm Residential Dlstrlct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etlwanda Avenue -APN• 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 ANALYSIS Staff continues to work with the applicant on the issues surrounding the westerly protect boundary which emerged at the January 26, 2004 Planning Commisslon meeting. Staff will be meeting with the applicant's arborist at the site on February 3, 2005, and the applicant's ITEMS C, D, & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP February 9, 2005 Page 2 engineer will be submitting the proposed revised site layout and grading plans during the week of February 7, 2005 Further review is needed beyond February 9, 2005 Staff is closely monitonng the situation and feels that afour-week delay is necessary to satisfactorily review these issues and so that suitable exhibits can be delivered to the Planning Commission for their thorough evaluation of the protect RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Vanance DRC2004-01002 until the regular Planning Commission meeting on March 9, 2005 Respectfully submitted, ?y Brad Buller City Planner BB VP\ma ~,D,~E a DRC2004-00491 VANCE PC ITEM: A Rancho Summit, LLC 24800 Chnsanta Dnve, #200 Mission Vieto, CA 92691-4819 Pulte Homes Corporatio _ 1351 Pomona Road , Corona, CA 92882 DRC2004-01289 TABE PC ITEM: B Joud Construction P O Box 2712 Corona, CA 92878 SUBTT16776, DRC2004-01002, 8 DRC2004-00052 VANCE PC ITEM: C, D, 8c E Loren N Fntr Trust 13104 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739-9574 Van Deale Dev Corp 2900 Adams Street, Swte C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 PC: 2-9-05 Planning Commission Meeting of a-~9~s RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ADDRESS Idyl ~U,~wA KD g b o~ `5l 0 ~ ~~n. ~5~?~ So~n~on PI. /!/03 y /,~rd1Ux L~ ~78~ C/0~1A6Fan Place ~2~~~f _12rftis7~'y~ CITY ITEM C~~~ .~ ~j _~ ~t ~(C . v P_ ~ ~ R.C, ~` C ~~ Q !~/6 NA E -A-(~h • ~-,2P~1(r