Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2005/03/23 - Agenda Packet
• • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C ~oNC~ MARCH 23, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I: CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Maaas _ Vice Chairman McNiel _ Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart _ ' ~ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS APPROVAL OF MINUTES III ~~~' ~ . March 9, 2005 . -', -~.<'~hV~:~~~.PUBLICHEARINGS - - The (ollow~ng dems are public heanngs m which concerned mdro~duals may voce their op~mon of the related pro/ect Please wad to be recogrnzed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opm~ons shall be l~mded to 5 minutes per mdrvidual for each protect Please sign m after speabng A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdnnde 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Une Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58. Related Files. Development Rewew DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701. Staff has prepared a Negative DeGaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from March 9, 2005) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 23, 2005 CUCAMONOAL B VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase in wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medwm Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58. Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 (Continued from March 9, 2005) C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to subdivide 3 2 net acres of land into 18 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street -APN 0210-062-39. Related Files: Variance DRC2004-01163, Minor Exception 2005-00189, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D VARIANCE DRC2004-01163 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES, INC - A request to allow the lot depth for Lots 6 and 8 for SUBTT16971 to be less than the minimum 90 feet in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street -APN: 0210-062-39 Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16971, Minor Exception DRC2005-00189, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885. E CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01176 - T-MOBILE, W EST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY AND CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT-A request to replace an existing 100-foot high lattice antenna with a 106-foot high monopine wireless faality in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling urnts per acre) within the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan, located at 5765 Etiwanda Avenue -APN. 0225-122-12. This project is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Gwdelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Fatalities). F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A proposed subdmsion of 41 units for residential condominium purposes on 3 74 acres of land in the Medwm Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approxmately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue -APN. 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, and 32 Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-00449, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review C~' C~ • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 23, 2005 Ccc~,uo a~ 3 DRC2003-00089 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7 27 acre parcel into 11 parcels in the General Industnal District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN. 0209-211-19. Related Files. Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration V. NEw BUSnvESS H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medum Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related Files• Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16776, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Continued from March 9, 2005) I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 41 condominwm units on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue -APN. 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, and 32 Related Files• Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 - MARK CAPELLINO - A request to develop 11 industrial office/warehouse bwldings totaling 126,843 square feet on 7.27 acres of land in the General Industnal District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN. 0209-211-19 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 23, 2005 Cr~ wa a 4 }j,, `r "``` ~~'°``~" ~]~ PUBLIC COMI~~NT5 ~" This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the comm~ss~on. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. -;" VIII= - COMMISSION BUSINESS ~:~" ^.~,x~ _-VIII: ADJOURNMENT-. ~ - The Plannrng Commtss~on has adopted Adm~mstreGve Regulatrons that set an 11.00 p m. ad/oumment Gme. If dems go beyond that Gme, they shall be heard only wrth the consent of the Commtss~on. 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Department Secretary o(the CRy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 17, 2005, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~ L ,7 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours poor to the meeting Hell enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Vstening dewces are available for the heanng impaired • • • Vicinity Map Planning Commission March 23, 2005 F, I w E B, H * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N City of Rancho Cucamonga C,D u'~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE. March 23, 2005 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medium Resldentlal Dlstnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Llne Road, approximately 1,200 • feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58. Related files Development Review DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Resldentlal Distrct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Llne Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an Increase in wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Resldentlal District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN. 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 . BACKGROUND On January 26, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public heanng for the above-referenced residential subdivision protect During the hearing, the Commissioners learned of specific concerns expressed by the neighboring property owners who own a large Items A, B, H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT • January 26, 2005 Page 2 parcel abutting the pro)ect to the west The two primary issues were the health and preservation of the existing Eucalyptus windrow on their property and the drainage along the westerly boundary line of the pro)ect The contention by the neighbors is that the proposed grading and retaining walls on the pro)ect boundary will compromise the health of the Eucalyptus trees and pose a significant hazard The applicant had antiapated the situation and presented a gwckly sketched revision by their engineer to the Grading Plan which included revised building pads, revised drainage, and the introduction of a "Woodcrete"-type fence that would eliminate the need for a continuous footing trench of a standard block wall The neighbors stated that their property gets flooded by upstream water that enters their property near their northeast comer. In adddion, the issue of the existing structure belonging to the neighbors that is situated across this westerly protect boundary was discussed The neighbors expressed reluctance to allow demolition of this structure, which is a regwred condition of approval for this protect A final issue was presented by staff regarding the preservation of the existing Blue Atlas Cedar tree The discussion of this issue was inconclusive. Considering all of these matters, the Planning Commission continued the items to give the applicant the opportunity to better investigate the alternatives, work closely with the neighbors, and prepare revised exhibits for review by staff. The original continuance was until February 9, 2005, and subsequent continuations have been until March 9, 2005, and March 23, 2005 ANALYSIS. A Westerly Property Line Issues (Eucalyotus windrow and drainage) As explained at the last hearing, the protect is designed to collect water at their north boundary (abandoned railroad corridor) into an underground storm drain through the site The applicant presented a revised Grading Plan, Site Plan, Tentative Tract Map, Site Utilization Map, and Master Plan for review by Planning staff and the Grading Review Committee (GRC) The substance of the revisions is to eliminate the need for retaining walls on the westerly protect boundary which will, in turn, eliminate trenching for footings in the root zone of the windrow and eliminate the fill earth issues which can also compromise the health of the Eucalyptus trees. This revision was accomplished by lowering the bwlding pads and shifting them to the east away from the boundary line The perimeter will be provided with a fence made of concrete pieces that use posts rather than a continuous footing, so minimal root intrusion will occur Planning staff found the revisions meet the regwrement of the Development Code and are substantially conforming to the plans seen by the Design Review Committee. The GRC conceptually approved the plans with small changes to lot drains on Lot 27 and Lot 31 Staff has drafted a proposed condition that regwres the fence be replaced with a matching block wall if the neighboring property is developed in the future A tree report was presented for review The tree report finds the revised Grading Plan satisfactory with regard to the preservation of the windrow Certain speafic recommendations are made with respect to soil compaction and tree pruning The . applicant's engineer has reviewed the tree report and finds the recommendations compatible with the revised plan Further preservation work, espeGally pruning, does involve the cooperation of the neighbors to the west ~1~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT January 26, 2005 Page 3 B Cross-boundary structure The bwlding now situated across the property line must be remedied The applicant and the neighboring property owners have expressed agreement on this issue C Blue Atlas Cedar The revised Grading Plan provides a revised detention basin design that preserves the Blue Atlas Cedar at its existing location by changing the location of the southerly perimeter (See Exhibit "C"). An arbonst will be regwred to treat the wound caused by a vehicle staking the tree Staff has been able to work closely with the applicant on the resolution of these issues and considers the revised protect to be a satisfactory solution RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the project through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Bra Bu ler City Planner Attachments Exhibit "A" -Staff Report dated January 26, 2005 Exhibit "B" -Planning Commission Minutes dated January 26, 2005 (excerpt) Exhibit "C" -Rewsed Grading Plan Exhibit "D" -Tree Report on westerly Eucalyptus windrow Exhibit "E" -Letter from Jens Thielmann dated March 4, 2005 Exhibit "F" -Revised Site Utilization Map Exhibd "G" -Rewsed Master Plan Exhibit "H" -Rewsed Site Plan Exhibit "I" -Rewsed Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "J" -Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit "K" - Streetscape Elevation on Base Line Road Exhibit "L" -Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit "M" -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated November 2, 2004 Exhibit "N" - I-15 Freeway Off ramp Realignment Preliminary Plan Exhibit "O" -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00052 Draft Resolu tion of Approval for Variance DRC2004-01002 r~ U ~~,1+ 3 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE January 26, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner gy Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN• 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58. Related Flle Development Review DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Remov~ Permit DRC2004-00701 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Variance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase in wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density Zone range 4 to 8 units per gross acre; proposed density' 3 1 units per gro~ acre I~ /~ N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT January 26, 2005 Page 2 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zornng North - Vacant and former Paafic Electric Railroad right-of-way (future regional trail), Low Residential South - Attached residential Condominium (under construction), Single-family residential (under construction), Medium Residential East - Single-family residential and vacant, Low-Medwm Residential, Office Professional West - Single-family residential, vacant; Low-Medwm Residential C General Plan Designations: Protect Site - Low-Medwm Residential North - Low Residential South - Medium Residential East - Low-Medium Residential, Office Professional West - Low-Medwm Residential D. Site Characteristics. The subject site is currently an operating plant nursery with a former residence used as office space The former Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way/future regional trail runs along the northerly boundary. The site generally slopes from the north to the southerly boundary at Base Lrne Road This portion of Base Lme Road and the abutting parcel to the east are slated for street and I-15 off ramp re-alignment in the future. ANALYSIS A General This project is located within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan and includes several particular site and architectural design regwrements. The lots range from 7,270 to 14,794 square feet in area with an average of 10,082 square feet. The protect provides a single access at Base Lme Road and a second access on Lime Avenue from the existing tract to the northeast. The two northerly cul-de-sac streets provide access to the future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, a planned regional trail along the former railroad right-of-way Because of the future re-alignment of the I-15 off ramping system that would result m moving the ramp closer to this tract, the staff proposes a condition of approval that regwres the applicant to disclose this future re-alignment of the off ramp to the east The project boundary walls are to be constructed to match the boundary walls provided along the south side of Base Line Road A condition to require removal of a building now situated across the westerly protect boundary has been provided m order to proceed with any further permits for the project B Design Review Committee. The Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect on November 2, 2004, and recommended approval subject to particular improvements to the detention basin and making a good faith effort to provide trail access from the most northeasterly cut-de-sac (Exhibd "I"). C Grading Committee: The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval. Like other protects in this area of Etiwanda, the drainage flows for this protect are proposed to be caught in an on-site detention basin pending the future completion of storm dram facilities for this area. The detention basin is proposed on four lots to the east of the southerly access along Base Line Road. The detention basin is temporary, and the lots will be developed with homes once the detention basin is removed after completion of the storm drain • ~,~3,y5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT January 26, 2005 Page 3 D. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined m the attached Draft Resolution of Approval. E. Neiohborhood Meetmg. The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on May 27, 2004 The meeting was sparsely attended and the project met with no dissatisfaction from the attendees. F. Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. The staff completed Part II of the Initial Study in consultation with outside sources and found that there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality during the site preparation. Such impacts would be caused by grading and egwpment exhaust. Mitigation measures hall be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-significant level A noise study was also prepared to evaluate the impact of the freeway traffic noise on the proposed residential lots. The study concluded that sound attenuation walls would reduce noise to acceptable levels. The protect will also have an impact upon biological resources due to the proposed removal of 60 on-site heritage trees under the related Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 application. An arbonst study was prepared to evaluate the health and condition of these trees The arbonst recommended removal of all trees except fora 29-foot Blue Atlas Cedar. If the Planning Commission concurs, then an issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be m order. VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS• The applicant is requesting a variance to allow wall heights greater than 8 feet The site abuts Base Line Road, classified as a Ma1or Divided Highway m the General Pla is approximately 500 feet from the I-15 Freeway travel lanes, and within 200 feet of the existing I-1 Freeway off ramp, hence, is subtect to traffic noise levels that exceed the City's standards The acoustical analysis indicates the need for sound attenuation walls up to 8 feet high relative to the pad heights, plus acoustic upgrades in the homes to reduce the noise to acceptable levels The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards; however, the Planning Commission must make the following findings m order to approve the request. The wall height variances have been granted for all other residential protects along the I-15 Freeway. The follov~nng are facts to support these findings: Fmdin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result m practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obfectwes of the Development Code. FacUs. The applicant has requested flexibility with the regwred wall height in order to construct sound attenuation walls to reduce traffic noise m compliance with the City's standards Variances for similar wall heights were granted previously for surrounding tracts 2 Fmdin ' That there are exceptional or extraordinary Grcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same district. FacUs: The project site is unusual because it is located adfacent to a major divided highway and the elevated I-15 Freeway. 3. Findm That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation woul~ deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the sam district. ~i ~ ~° PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16776, DRC2004-00052, AND DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT . January 26, 2005 Page 4 FacUs Without the Variance, the protect would be deprived of privileges enjoyed by other owners within the same district to develop single-family residences and to construct sound attenuation walls necessary to protect said homes from excessive traffic noise levels. The proposed wall heights are consistent with those on surrounding properties for which the Planning Commission has granted vanances. 4. Fmdin That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege mcensistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements m the vicinity. Facts. Because the location of the site adjacent to a mator noise source is unique, the proposed project will be m the spirit of other vanances that have been approved in the general area. 5. Fmdin That the granting of the Variance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally mfunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity. Facts Granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be matenally intunous to properties or improvements m the viGnity On the contrary, granting of the variance will reduce noise levels to levels consistent with City standards, hence, prevent exposure of residents to excessive noise levels. Based on the above analysis, staff believes that there are sufficient facts to support the findings CORRESPONDENCE' This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends approval of the protect through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respecttu submitted Brad B r City Planner Attachments• Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "F" - Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Streetscape Elevation on Base Lme Road Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit "I" - Design Review Committee Action Comments Dated November 2, 2004 Exhibit "J" - I-15 Freeway Off ramp Realignment Preliminary Plan Exhibd "K" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00052 Resolution of -01002 4 Approval for Vanance DRC200 ~ / ~~t~T/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting January 26, 2005 Chairman Macias called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Commission to order at 7 00 p.m The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Cucamonga Gwc Center, 10500 Gwc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Macas then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT. Richard Fletcher, Rich Macias, Lar~McNiel, Cristine McPhail ABSENT. Pam Stewart STAFF PRESENT. Brad Buller, City Planner, Dan Col an, PnnGpal Planner, Kenn Ennis, Assistant Gty Attorney; Dan Ja , Senior Gvil Engineer, Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner, Gad Sa ez, Planning Commission Secretary; Lois Schrader, Secretary; Mi mdh, Assistant Planner ..... ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announce ts. ..... Motion: oved by Fletcher, seconded by McNiel, carried 3-0-1-1 (Macias abstain, Stewart absent), to ap ve the minutes of January 12, 2005. PUBLIC HEARINGS A ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDTENTATIVETRACTMAPSUBTT16776-VANDAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots within the Low-Medium Residential Distnd (48 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approwmatey 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN•022I-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58. Related Files Development Review DRC200¢00052, Vanance DRC200401002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC200400701. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideretton. B VARIANCE DRC200401002-VANDAELEDEVELOPMENTCORPORATION-Arequestforan increase in wall height related to 59 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low- Medium Residential District (48 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximatey 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN• 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files: Tentative Trail Map SUBTT16776, Development Review DRC2004-00052, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701. +~ " ~,~3, t~ S NEW BUSINESS • C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC200400052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of site plan and elevations for 59 single- family homes on 19 acres of land within the Low-Medium Residential Distnil (48 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN. 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Vanance DRC200401002, and Tree Removal Pemtk DRC2004-00701. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Vance Pomeroy, Contrail Planner presented the staff report. He mentioned that new information was received from the applicants this afternoon lust poor to the meeting He reported that the adjacent property owners to the west have expressed concerns that the roots of the windrow on the adjoining property would be damaged by the proposed block retaining wall with wrought iron on top He stated the applicant proposed a change in the grading plan to eliminate the need for a retaining wall. Stephen King, 2900 Adams Street, Suite G25, Riverside, stated he is the Executive Vice President of Van Daele Development He said they are generally in concurrence moth the conditions as proposed by staff but wished to modify some of them He asked that the condition requiring preservation of the Blue Atlas Cedar be deleted. He explained that the property owner originally meshed to take the Cedar tree to his new home but the tree was damaged about a year ago and the cost of moving the tree is prohibRive Mr. King submitted a letter from the arbonst stating the damage to the tree would shorten the tree's useful life and ability to recover from stress Chairman Macias asked if staff had reviewed the document. Mr. Pomeroy said staff had not seen it before the meeting. Mr. King also asked that Planning Condition No 8, be modified to allow for a lot line adfustment to remedy the building encroachment. He said the engineer on the pro~eil could discuss the revisions to the west side of the lot that would avoid disturbance to the tree line that lies to the west of the property line. He asked that the landscaping and wall conditions be modified to utilize WoodCrete, which uses posts in lieu of the continuous footing required for a block wall. Chairman Macias asked ff these changes had been discussed wkh staff. Brad Buller, Gty Planner reported that the applicant met with staff earlier in the day. He suggested stall could respond after heanng the applicant's proposal. Jens Thielmann, Thielmann Engineers, 221 South Glassell Street, Orange, said the current plan shows a typical 6 foot freestanding masonry wall along the west property line. He suggested an alternative of providing a graded slope that would lower the rear portions of Lots 1-10. Because the rear of those lots are only 20-25 feet deep, he proposed shifting Street "A" 7 feet to the east, which would give a flat back yard depth of at least 20 feet for those lots. He indicated they would provide a smaller graded slope from 0-4-foot high for Lots 27-31 He proposed using WoodCrete or a similar product, which would have posthole footings, thereby reducing the impact on the tree roots. Mr Buller asked if they are planning to use the WoodCrete wall as a retaining wall. Mr. Thielmann explained that by lowering the grade and exporting some dirt, they would be at grade • with the neighbonng property, and for those lots where they cannot lower the grade, they would provide a 2.1 graded slope He showed across-seilion of the proposed slope. Planning Commission Minutes -2%~ ~ ~ January 26, 2005 Commissioner McNiel asked rf the slope then encroaches on the backyards and their workable, useable space. • Mr. Thielmann replied that k would encroach but those lots have deeper backyards and it would not interfere. and d would basAcally have a V-ddch a He askedulwhere the wet r would 9ond back up to the house Mr Thielmann said the slope would go down 4 feet and then have a 2-foot bench. He stated that vinth a type of a French dram, the water would infiltrate and yard drams could be placed in those lots that are affected so they dram to the street. Commissioner McNiel asked ~f that would occur everywhere. Mr Thielmann said d would not. Commissioner McNiel asked if the French drains would accommodate stones like what had happened recently. Mr. Thielmann replied the infilUaUon area would be gravel Imed and the runoff could be accommodated. Commissioner McNiel asked if that meant there would be cross-lot drainage rather than having the water geriing to the street from each lot. Mr. Thielmann said they could not get the water to the street in some conditions but they would . expel the water to mfittrete wnthm the lot. Commissioner McNiel asked for confirmation that they were requesting to use a WoodCrete wall m place of the retairnng wall. Mr. Thielmann responded affirmatively. Commissioner McPhail asked Mr Thielmann H he had an example of a WoodCrete wall She said what she has seen of this product is not very aestheticaly pleasing. Commissioner McNiel noted d could be painted but said it is not a masonry wall. Mr. Thielmann explained that there are other products that are similar and there are venous grades to choose from. He noted that if the Commissioners are contained about the drainage, they could create an easement along the back of the lots and have the Homeowners' Assouation responsible for maintenance of the drainage system. Commissioner Fletcher asked rf the appearance of the WoodCrete product is solid. that portholes are drug and the panels fitento slots ontthe post Ito secure themle wood He noted Commissioner McNiel noted there is an example on Vineyard Avenue South of Artow Route. He noted it is embossed with a wood gram. Commissioner McPhail asked where the Blue Atlas Cedar is located and why they can't grade around k. January 26, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes ~' ~ , / / Mr. King stated that it is in the detention area and because there is so much work that needs to occur around it, they believe it should be removed He noted it is near the back of one of the proposed lots in the detention basin. Chairman Madas asked how the tree would affect the basin He asked d the basin could be dug, but still leave the tree in place Mr. Thielmann said N is possible Mr. King said ft is actually on the slope of the basin and it is not impacting the construction of the current homes. Chairman Madas asked who is responsible for maintenance of the detention basin. Dan James, Senior Crvd Engineer, stated that the developer is responsible for maintenance but the Cdy is requesting the developer to agree to post a $10,000 bond to maintain the detention basin and that the City has no problem wrath leaving the tree where it is. Commissioner Fletcher observed that when the lots in the detention basin are developed, the tree v~nll be at the back of a lot and he questioned why it could not stay where d is. Mr. Buller noted that there is a mitigation measure in the environmental study requinng that the Cedar be preserved through relocation. He noted that d that mitigation measure were deleted, the study would need to be re-circulated. preservation m ordert Cm gat rthe effedstto less thans gn fcantoHe stated that preservationf m place could be considered as a like mitigation measure for the tree. Mr. Buller asked for staffs thoughts on the change in grading and materials for the wall Mr. Pomeroy noted that staff only had an opportunity to review d earlier in the day. He said there appears to be suffiGent excess in the tots to allow shifting of Street "A" to accommodate the grade change He thought the WoodCrete wall matenal seems durable and would allow a solid fence that is noninvasive to the eucalyptus tree line. Mr. Buller mentioned that the grading option is less than ideal and that the alternate wall being proposed is different than all the other perimeter walls proposed vnth this project. He added that the plans did not show the windrows on the adtacent property and that it came to staffs attention late in commented thattstaffl feels the solut ones acceptab eebut less than dea~e adtacent property. He Daniel Mora, 34077 Country Road, #25, Woodland, stated he is one of the property owners adjacent to the proposed development He reported that when the developer approached them in October, he told Mr. King he was particularly concerned about the trees, the demolition of the budding that straddles the property line, and the drainage He said that during heavy rains, there is a lot of runoff in the area. He did not believe his concerns have been suffiGently addressed. He commented that he provided staff Nnth an arbonst's opinion that the trees along the western boundary of the project would not tolerate the construction of the walls, as the trees need at least a 30-foot buffer around their root zones to have a chance to survive. He noted that if the health of the trees is compromised, then they could fall, causing liability issues. He said that even with the new slope and wall plan proposed by the developer, he is concerned heavy construction vehides in the area will damage the tree roots He said the wall would be too dose to the trees, providing only about 2 feet of drainage and the sloping grade would bury the root crown. He said he would like another arborist's opinion. He asked 'rf the French drain would also cut into the soil, thereby cutting the tree roots. He January 26, 2005 Planning Commisswn Minutes ~r~l f / ~' suggested that standing water following a rainstorm and winds could be a problem to the tall, large, histonc windrow. He said he asked the developer to tnm them and preserve them but they were not . interested in doing that. Mr. Mora said that if the City wants to preserve the trees, there should be some compensation for the property owners. He thought the developer only appears interested in dealing with the building problem and is stonewalling them about their other concerns. He asked the Planning Commission to consider all of their concerns He believed the Initial Study did not consider the windrow trees. Commissioner McNiel asked if they are Blue Gum Eucalyptus, their height, approximate age, and how much of the property Mr Mora owns and his intenbons for his property. Mr. Mora replied they are Blue Gums, approwmately 60-70 feet tall. He said he did not know their age but they are approximatety 5 feet in diameter at the base of the trunk He reported he owns the two parcels to the west of the proposed development. He noted that his father and brothers currently live on the property and the trees are in their front yard. He added that the proposed wall is only about 20 feet from one of the residences. Commissioner McNiel asked how many trees there are Mr Mora responded that the arbonst indicated there are 51 Commissioner McNiel commented that Blue Gums are subted to breakage and disease and they have usually been replaced with Spotted Gums because they are hardier. He asked Mr Mora ff he is open to having them replaced. Mr Mora replied they would like to have their liability lowered but they want to conserve the windbreak and shade they provide He said he would entertain being compensated for them . Commissioner Fletcher asked if the windrow runs the full length of the property from north to south. Mr. Mora said yes, but the windrow comes lust short of Base Line Road. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the trees are healthy. Mr. Mora replied he had submitted an arborist report today that indicated the trees are relativey healthy and viable for their age. Commissioner Fletcher asked what the remedy is for the building that is encroaching the property hne. that if d doesdn t trigger therrequirement to provide ssdewalks or improvemeints oni his property. pt Loren FMz, 1311)4 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is the owner of the property being developed He said he wanted to clanfy that in October they met with the Mora family and Van Daele Development offered to remove the trees. He indicated he owns a nursery and offered to replace the trees. He noted that the Mora family expressed concerns about the trees falling and being their liabilty. He reported that the issue of the encroaching building had been known foryears and that he had told them he would not press the issue until he was ready to develop. He noted that Van Daele offered to remove the building and prowde four storage containers in ds place and then the Mores expressed concerns about lights from Base Line Road coming onto their properly because the building wouldn't be there to block them. He said the developer offered to put in a temporary screen wall. He believed the developer has tned to cooperate. He commented the Blue AUas Cedar . tree was damaged when it was hit with a tractor about a year ago. He said he looked into relocating the tree but found it would cost about $25,000 to move wdh no guarantee of its viability. He stated Planning Commission Minutes -5- January 26, 2005 that the tree had never been irrigated and if it is left in the detention basin, it would probably die on its own. He said he bases this opinion on 30 years of expenence in the nursery business. Mr Mora said he is ony looking for consideration of his nghts. He acknowledged lPe Pevrteyloper offered to remove the trees but did not offer compensation for the loss of use of their roe He felt the developer was asking him to give up his nghts to his property so the development can go forwarJ. He commented that he does not wnsh to stop the development; he only wants to be compensated. He remarked that they talked to City staff about having storage containers on their property and were informed that the City would not look favorably on d Mr 14ng stated they offered to not only remove the vnndrow but to replace the trees d the City wanted them replaced. John Mora, 13096 Base Line Road said he lives in the house neat to the building that encroaches the property line. He said he had contains about the drainage and that water comes down from the north through the old culverts. He wanted to be sure they would not be inundated by water. He commented they were working on the lot line adjustment He added that they had not seen the arborist report until today. He asked that the City look carefully at the drainage. He said that the water that is curie He noted theret sea onvate d rtrtroad to the north that has put a of of dirt on Base from his property P Line Road He said that when it rams very hard, the first lane of the street is under water He indicated there is drainage from north of the railroad tracks that runs along the trees in conjunction vnth any run off from their development and their retention basin He commented that there are ditches now where the old trucks were parked and when the storms came they filled up, overflowed, and drained down to Base Lime Road. He said there is a telephone pole where their properties Join. He was contained about accidents because of plans to widen Base Line Road because that will cars go over them. aHe say hthe windrowt protects h s propetrty from the windcsun, and dust n and Mr. Thielmann said that the drainage would significantly improve with the development. Commissioner McNiel asked if there would be any cross lot drainage. Mr, Thielmann said yes but they should see a big improvement in the drainage overwhatthey have now He commented that there currently are two culverts to the north, which wall be intercepted and placed underground under the street and they well drain to the detention basin. He said they had also suggested the lot line adjustment to the Mora faintly so that could be pursued if the Moras do not want to take down the building. Deanne ad scent tot he proposed evelopmentC She expressed concemsaabout the engineer's properly 1 theories. She noted that when Caltrans made improvements to Base Line Road and removed the large drainage ditches located along the road, Caltrens assured them that the improvements were designed to keep water off their property She reported that Base Line Road floods every time d rains since the removal of the ditches. She noted that dunng one storm Mr. Fritz had to dig a trench to channel the water because it was coming down along their property line. She feared that wdh the new houses being higher, the water might drain toward their property instead of where it is supposed to go. Chairman Mauas closed the public heanng and asked for comments from staff. Mr. Buller said that rf the Commissioners were uncomfortable with what was presented tonight, he would recommend a 2-week continuance so better exhibits could be provided. He remarked that the technical aspects of how the west property line is addressed with respell to the walls and grading couldbe referred to the Planning and Engineering staff tithe Commission fek comfortable with what Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 26, 2005 was presented. He commented that like Commissioner Mcested b the aot flicant's enc neertoni ht. reported that staff does not normally favorthe grading Bugg y PP g g With respect to the Cedar tree, he said the Initial Study requires mitigation to relocate the tree but staff believes an option would be to retain rt rn its current location rather than relocating k Chairman Maces commented that it was out of the ordinary for all of these issues to be brought to light today Commissioner McPhail noted the condition for the Cedar tree stipulates that it be relocated. She asked if doing anything else would necessitate re-circulation of the Initial Study. Mr Ennis said that if the Commission finds an equal or more effective mitigation measure and includes it in the Resolution of Approval, then the study would not have to be re-circulated, but if the condition were deleted or lessened, it would require re-dreulation of the environmental documents. Chairman Macias asked for confirmation that if the mitigation measure is deleted but it is replaced with a new mitigation measure that is equal or better than the one deleted, then the documents would not need to be re-circulated. Mr. Ennis confirmed that is correct. Commissioner Fletcher stated he feR uncomfortable with the proposed changes to the project and asked for staff to more thoroughly review them before the Commission makes a decision He asked if the Mores would have civil remedies if drainage does go from the rear of the dots of the new homes to the Mom's property or rf the installation of the wall lulls the trees on the Mora property. He asked'rf such liability would extend to the Gty. Mr. Ennis stated the Gty is granted immunity to this type of liability He added that if the properly owner's actions cause damage to the adtacent property, it would be a pnvate remedy. Commissioner Fletcher questioned the legal responsibility regarding the encroachment of the budding He asked rf the adtacent property owner is required to remove it. Mr. Ennis replied that normally the City would not approve the protect until the building is removed, but that we are requiring the developer to remedy the encroachment. He said the developer has three options demolish the entire budding with the consent of the owner, process a lot line adjustment, or sever the building. He stated the appropnate time to resolve the matter is prior to development. Commissioner Fletcher commented on the proposal to shift the location of Street "A " He said it appears the depth of the lots is sufficient but he is unsure as to how rf affects the lower lots or the detention basin He said he would like to see plans before approving the project. Chairman Macias commented that there are too many unresolved issues and said he would like a continuance to allow staff Ume to thoroughly review the proposed changes Commissioner McNiel said that he does not believe the project is approvable because of the "floating" grading plan being presented and the currently unresolved tree issues. He believed the developer and neighboring property owners need to resolve the issues. Commissioner McPhail concurred and said she felt ill prepared to take action with all of the information presented at this late trine. She commented that she wants to see the issues addressed, trees, drains, the Biue Atlas Cedar, and then she wants all the parties to come bads with solutions. She was contained about the quality of the proposed fendng and also concerned about the drams Planning Commission Minutes y~ /' January 26, 2005 /Ji ~ ~7 and "v" ditch She agreed that property owners would want to fill in the area. She agreed they should continue the dem. Mr Buller commented that he heard the Commissioners express contains relating to the west property line and the Cedar tree He asked if the Commissioners had any other issues with the rest of the project Commissioner McNiel noted there were also contains about water getting onto Base Line Road. No other contains were raised by the Planning Commission. Mr Buller recommended a two-week continuance and said d could then be continued again if necessary. Motion Moved by McNiel, seconded by Fletcher to reopen the public heanng and continue Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Development Review DRC2004-00052 to February 9, 2005 Motion tamed by the following vote AYES' FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL NOES' NONE - cartied ABSENT: STEWART D D LOPMENTREVIEW DRC200400404-HOGLE-IRELAND, INC -ArequesttoconsUuda Comm 'al building of 8,350 square feet for a retail use, a dental office, and a restaurant in the Industnal rk Distnct, Subarea 7, located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Stre - APN 0229-011-84 Related Files: Development Revew Modification DR9& 11, Developm Review Modification DRCDR99-11MOD, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15630. ff has found the project to be within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative D station and Mitigation Monitonng Program adopted by the Planning Commission on Apnl 28, 99, and June 28, 2000, respectively, and a Negative peGaretion adopted by the Planning Co mission on February 13, 2002. This protect does not raise or create new environmental i acts not already considered in the previous Negative Declarations. Mike Smith, Assistant Planner, gave the sta port. ' Chairman Macias opened the public heanng. Carter Ewing, 301 Shipyard Way, Newport Beach, said he' the applicant. He thanked staff for their assistance dunng the process and said he agreed with the ditions of approval as presented by staff. Commissioner McNiel asked which part of the building is a restaurant. Mr. Ewing replied R is the 2,500 square feet on the western side and has a pa He remarked that d is a Wahoo's Fish Taco restaurant and there is not a dnve-thru. Hearing no fuRher testimony, Chairman Macias Gosed the public hearing. Commissioner Fleisher supported the protect and said the elevations are consistent the surrounding buildings Chairman Macas concurred. Planning Commission Minutes -8- January 26, 2005 yyp[¢NWY~C ~~ i ~lfM ( U~6 SM M [.L eum[ P mw lelw-nn ~~~1 v«w us h s cur ~.~~a~~m ~r~ r i,~ Oe®~ ~~®cew~i~: mw . ~ ~ v ~m-o s w~sm~aop' Bu ® ®_ r_s ~~L[Y SR B r . ~m~~~ _~~~~ ~ ~~ m _ 5~3~'1' ~~ ~ ~_ _~~ H_Ky~~ ac a¢r : w~ ~a wo aem a+va ' I BMP'S ~a~~~ ~ ~~ 6~~_ ~~j ~r -~ ~~ } -_= -_~=-- CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN rrM ~sns an a wrx„o ,_ i _ _ __ _r_ __> _- MuIE fAloax+tt AuL-(9P6~-E/~D. G ~ ' L'ffi I - ~° 1J . ~'~ ~ - I i ~ 0 i m ~ - r I _ __- ~~ i ~ c~ ~ , __ / / 1 ' - I y I \,-.. ~ ~ L ~.. ~~ .j _L :i ,.~. / 1 '_ mlOl WIZr ~~~J ~fyfAEIP__ _ _ rn dam p(ewwm" !° °~°~+ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN DETAILS AND SECTIONS rrnn ~sns arcaw~o M •~~ YL fM _ --~ 7 1- -- __ _ .~ ~ -~ -- F a. ~. ----------a------ ----r-------------- ---------------------- ----- ~_ .- .. "~f :- .. ~,,,: , ----- - ---- --~------------ ~-"- ------_cr-- a.,w. ~ R.,V,,, 1_[ ~ No cro`w'-~s~' dpr.,n3 ~ d',unS ' V O + / ~-ry M ~e N /~/v/Q r {/YG~ th -' --- r. s. -- ____ a ~~ ...e ~. 1 ~ ~ -~ ` ' e4 --- _ ,• ~~ ._ ~° =- -- r.~ ,• .~ ,~ _._ -- ,- NI 4 BISF IPE AYMD 1115 .~.~ -r ~ .~ ~~~.,,...-. r.-i d muqunox v.~..oe.....d ~...,~, I ,~...e ...,..I VAN DABI.13 DSVSIAPMSN'r 9516&267 Aar 02 Ofi 7233p 'rY Sims Tree,Sp ~9~ IL.9 ~S Sims free ~l'eaCth 61 C~ 92509, Van Daele DeSve~ ~ G2~. 2900 Adams Riverside, CA 92504 Alta: Michael Van Daele March 2, 2005 Re: West yrindrow '~ 00 ?/004 pt 6SS--2267 Sims has mviewed the revised fence and grading plus near the W ~ windrow of Eucalyptus trees. Sims recommended removal and replatrtin$ the windrow. j,'an D acts proposed this solution to theme owners, but currently this is not feeaible. Our alternative is m preserve these EucarYPtus trees. The peps that Van Daele will perfotm'to pxaser<`e these trees are 3s follows: The p~p~ty line fence will be of post and beam constevctiam, eliminating tiu need for a footing sevetiog roots and soil compaction near tke base oftba Euc4tYPt~ trees. Pilot holes will be made to ascertainU a n° ~° ~n roots prior to digging the hole for the post or caisson. P° roots the post hole will be moved. Gradin8 }~ been adjusted so no cats will be made in the protects i root zone. Fill, while rieve'r good beneath a tree, will be limited stYrd ccanp~ctiom of fill will only occur within five fear of the bur~ding envelope. Current plena include: Lot # 1 -has 18 inches of fill be~innin$11 feet from the tree., in tk,e North West corner. N y ecarr+a~sim.~a~xeaen~wwxoos /~~,~ `b - • 03/02/2005 14:13 S r re Tree Spedellrt Mer 02 OS 12:33p LJ ~ oof/ooa VAN DASLE DEVEIAPMENT 96168'.12237 P•2 Lot #2, 8, ~ 9 - i foot plus fill over the roar zone. Lot #3, 6, & 7 -1 foot plus full at the South West corner in sa friar gle shape f ll. Lot#4813-no fill. Lot #10 - no fall. This arborist believes the majority of the Eucalyptus treo roots srre on dle west side of these trees and close to the base on the east side due to compaction from the gravel mad and pruning to provide vehicle soul utility line clearance. . Van Dae1e vF~ll hire an ISA (Interasttionsil Society of Arbor,'.culture) certified anborist to trim these trees. Sims recommends pruning according to Aa~i31 A-300 stans9atds_ G~lrrently the windrow is off balance, leasaigg f.~vay ~,vest. The trees have not been premed on tb~e west side in a ] Dreg tame if ever. They requu'e pruning to balenoe and allow for wind flow without removing more than, 25°fo of the foliage. The ag+e ofthe trees, the road compactiaar limiting rooting. khe lack of maintenance, arld wind have cheated a heavy south westwar3leax. These factors have created a history of tree failure. See photos of blown over rootballs. Gtuzently a EucalyptuuS tree from a cross windrow behiad the barns failed and is lying oa the roof of the barn. A rooting stimulant can be applied immediately after grading Fred fence constrslction is complete. This is performed using a five foa~t probe with water and aerating the soil as the application is mach Trees heavily impacted can be treated with a boner protestant All of the above actions will lessen the likelihood osf~ lure. butt ntot eliminate it. The photos of failed trees sand the gap F•' Eucalyptus tree windrow show, failure has been occurring £realrleutly for years. • Since failure has been occurring for years, removal of the tr::es is thls best option. However the measures adopted by Van Daele Devel opmtrxt to 2 o~ioh~slm.rxa aadt~spaufdimaam ~~~, ~ l`~ r~ooa/ooa OJ/OY/YOOb 14:1J FAd 909 J34 Y998 VAN DABLB DSVSIAPa1GNT 95168E?267 I~~ Mer 02 Ob 12:34p Sims Tres Spedelist preserve the trees will allow the project to move forward wi~3iout ,irasticatly increasing the likel~ood of the windrow Eucalyptus trees failing .is a result of conslnlcdoa Specifications: Closing: This Arborist report was performed entirely at ground level. I~'o c limbing was performed and a bucket lift was not employed. No mot crown excavations and no inerelnent boring were performed. T6.er-k You for Ule opportunity to be of service. Choosing Sims a: your Tree Health Care provider supports the $ims "Tree Learning Center" opera'~ng as a not for profit educational center. sincerely, susaD. M sings Agricultural Biologist Certified Urban Forester # 122 Back yard fill must not be compacted. Bac1c yard must not be over excvvabod. Fill must not be plied on tnuilcs. Any roots encountered during over excavation for a house pad or uencbing for foundation must be must be cleanly cut by hauld. A baclshee rips roots, if using a backhoe this must be monito»ed visueliy by a oertifled Arborist I.SA Certified Arborist #WU0286A California Agricultural Adviser #1096 California Agricultural Applicator # 31179 EacL- phoooe 3 OCapytibhl9ieM Tree Heallh SpmmIaO2W! 03/05/2005 17:57 7147449312 ~.I TH•IELMAI`I ~-_- Meth a. 2005 Mr. Vmec Paazmy c>n efRen~ho a~ 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Ghcamonga, CA 91730 Soble~ TrectNo.lti77ti Deer Mr. Pomeroy: Sincerely, Thielttmnn I have reviewed the Merch 2, 2005 letter by Susan Sims [cgardmg grading arvu[~ the eucalyptus ~'~ the west The Snal gradiag plan vnll comply vnth the outlined recommendadmu. Should my imanhcryatad condidone anae during the final destga I will eonsnlt with Sims end follow her guidelines. f~ ji M THIEI_MAh&J ENGINEERS PAGE 02/02 ~~ Ma 2574'1 pIP.17tl9t 1D5 221 5, OLASSELL STREET ORANGE, CA 92866 • (714) 744-97D0 FAX (71 d) 7d4 9312 ~,B,Ha~ SITE UTILIZATION MAP ~ rrM. ~sns a,,,~p, wuNmww Af ~ L~ I{ ~~~i ~ _ VMN(f VIGVlf Pm® FAIL L, f ``I 11 ~~m ~r ~.~.vr L_I I ~ ~_oL v.rs _ J.~~ ~, 1- ~~ ~ I. ,... 1- . .gym :.~a.....4 --- a ` W ~ ~ I I ~} I ~ I W I I W ~~\.~ • ~ /i ~~ W ~ l ,~- °,,~ y I_ ~, ~ ~ ~17. ~ _~ ~ , ~ '~Pa. ~ a. t ~ _ _~~_-_ ~~ i jl i i ~ ~~/ /~~~//) i 5 / ,~` `fF, I jI ` ~ ~ / II ~ ~"ti ~ %rd ~ r I ~ ~ i a. I ~. I (iBRAINEIMCf 1M6! ULSI 00lQIRYCf101Q Y a ~.'~ ~~_ .~.. MASTER PLAN TTM. 16776 crtr or nANC~a cucALaNOA w s ~~ U_- Seaan~___ . `~, f r 1 .~' e~ ' ~ - _, ,~ 'r~ T ~ f ~~ ~„ ~ _~ _, --_-- ~ _ ~, ~. ~~ ~ ti ~I, l~ 1 . ~ - ~ i • ~~' ,(I ~L I VAGNf VAtlJ(f L l L FAQ ~ {~ , I , I ....~ I ~ Lon ~ ~ ~ 1_ -_ J { a ~ a I I M u I W ` . j I ~ I 1 a n ~ a i a I, W II F J..} _~.r. _IJ I _ I (fO BE U9®FOR~j .Y .• aP FUN1iEOFgiM~P ~~" ra~wuc+~em ~ W ; 1 ;~ I ,~ ;~ i i ,,,.~% _ .- / ,' I~ ~ ' !i I - - ~ ~,. s~ ~imre mra~ ~ ! III ~ 4', , ' ~„ ~~ I ~i VAN OAple mnaunox ure ~.@.s~a.nn ~l /' ~~ wi~.e•'® mu~® s ~ s ~ w~ ~® Y` ~ s- ._ _~ -- . ~- ~n ----- 8 SITE PLAN rerrrarne Taacr No. gene mr v Iwon amn MUE C1tNeMfY iPll (SY8'G ElSdU10 -- /{' _-, r /' „ I s tt' J7 C1 ,~ I f ® _ __ ~ ~/ U ~ ` ~ - , ~ , f Iris f ~ 1 . ~ -; ~} ~ .4_.~ ~ _ i, ~J J 0 [v ' ~ ® 4 _ ~ y T tl Ir I \ 6 ~; ~. :4vA`- 5 ~ ' G ~ ~~~~.~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ _ ~- ~ ` ; ~ .~ L _~__~ ~__-__~- .~~6+LLl. -----SffEPLAN-- ven n,~__ Tert~,rv~mrcria.wn ~~+~" - . • ~ ~ ___ ~8 i5 i ~~ ~I J L '' I ~, ~~ l ~ .~~-~ _~__- -'-MT;. -' 7T' ~~ ~~ _~ -- ~I'~I~~ i i1~ _~ _ _ _~ \\ = TeL ~~ I _ ~ II ® ~ 57= /i _ _ . .y ~® r7 i_ a ,~ .1 ~~ _-_ ; ~~ ~ .r 'ate .9C{~~ a /''~ ~ ~A - ~ P~ ~~ - j sou--.: - ~~~ _ _- ~ t ~~ ' / TENTATIVE TRACT MAP min ~sns n `~ an a a~xau arrorra / __ _ ~-,_ e ~ menwn ~ (wart vsoorq VIGNT' MAE ' ~~ ' a a ~ 1 ~\ Z r rs.m ~ a ~ i~ GI v ~I ° I .~_si r ~,, ~ ~~ _ _ mGs .. liC~ a rr . ~ ~ I , • I a ° - - _----- --- _ N ~~,_ ~~ - - _ 3 ` • ~ ~ ~~ a ~ 1 ~ \ ~ _ i G i ~ ~ ~ _ t ~i ~ • _ r t ~ ~ rr ~r ~ - --- - - --- .., E _ e __ = ~ j ' a _~ ~L ~ i ~ e € I 6 E ~ r ° I . ~ a„ ;~~ r R I "~ _ G' c { 'r v .~. E ~ i . ~• s ~ ~ --'~ r ~.~ 1 1 ~' N ~ M ~ ~ r ~ a. _ f _ ~ a - 9 ___ ~ ~11~1 N y iii ~ i" m r• ~ ~ ~ ' - ~. m° __-__~ NIS ~ ~ _ - ~ __ ___ ' -- ~_~' ___~ ~ LM lErIM1IIVEIRM.'l WP~fl11 ---- o - ~~.o,,e,P ------ ~ ~ m..m.,,~ 3H _ - , ~~~,,- a $~ p~ ~~ ~_ /~ N ,1 -1- ~1 i • 1 l ila~- ®e . w yam E'I7WANDA ESTATES BASE LINE STREETSCAPE ~ r ® s - I a~ I ,m,.,auc ~xncr lane xnpcxocucws+oNC.tu AND PROJECT ENTRY W N ~ ~~ ~_ na L~ ~. "W',^',.'"`° VAN DAELE DEVEIAPMENT , • 1h3Wd0'I3A30 373Va NtlA •~ N'JIS30 AtltlNIWl73tld vo voHOwv~n~o,uNVU 4LGVI1]VYl SOtlYA 1NOtl~ ~Y71dA1 $3],V,L$ff VQNVti11.].H ]am nv#v .~.~ ,!!,!fr 1i~'9 1,1!,1r111u1r S fi t iili ii~i~ i ;,1~1,, !,,1i1 iiliiiiiilii#1 _ + _ ! 1 F , 1 11 111 ! ,g. lillli}ill~;1;;,Gi~idl~1 iliii~9i lif~i ( j li~t~ ~~I~i,l~lli,l;~',~j~~ilii, ~1i~~1! ~ 6~~s~, 111~i+iit9ll~!111~1~!,1i~~i1 ~ rlii~lll . it ,i~,~ r. J ~J 3 I~~N q-,~,N a$ s ~~ C`~ W rAro do¢ iwnr FUmfWOY allft L~^ O~ ~i uvn~mui ~ i mmcmar xrlw , , vrlw ~roarrimod mom xtlxl ~uni --- =+~-li `-i --- ' ~ \~ molar vavr Y15IFI IBfP10011 N~xF iwtum r~ rrlrr WL ~4 CG{ 11l-~II ~esr~oolr-z~~~' rorAl=tl~+~' c,+R,lre=use ~sr~ooe ETIWANDA ESTATES .,,o VAN DAFIE DEVPIAPMENfC0RP0RAl70N ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA Smle lll'=1'-0' ~'f-~ .~ '~ ~/" FAOM Sak 114`1'-0' LFFf SmE RIGIII SNE PLAN I ~~ Sry4A-Spmwh ETIWANDA ESTATES ~.,,,,,.,,,,~,,,,., o.,,-,m...,,,,, ,,,o VAN DAELE DEVFlOPMFNTCORPORATION ~~`-~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA "~ • a- ^ s ~~ Z ~.1 • FROM Salr 114`-I'~ PLAN I ©~~ SyleB Ea~yCah(wnm IFFISmE -~ RIGNTSIDE ETIWANDA ESTATES ~......,.,~.~.,,., o.~...m... ,~~.. VAN DAEIb DEVELOPMFNTCORPORA770N M RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA ..- ~,P ~`F rZ ~01~+, N FROM Sok V4`-I'-0' r _-_ LFFf SmE -- --_ RlGlli SEIE PLAN L sync s ETIWANDA ESTATES ~..»..~.,.~.,,., o.~,m.-~„ ,~~.. VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION M' RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA »». .y' ~ ~ ..~_, i W V.1 VJ FROM Snk IN`-I'-0' REAR Il~}TSE)E AIGNTSE)E PLAN L SryleD CaEfommBmgalmv ETIWANDA ESTATES _~••••...-~.++d o•~••. •••.• ,~~.. VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENE CDRPOMTIDN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA PLAN 2 ~emn~zsaw~,smRm SECONDFLOOR FVISTFUIOR FUISTFi00R=1,403SF SECOhDFL00R=I,fOfSF 117fAE=1,910SF GARAGE=1tl SF ETIWANDA ESTATES s~k u4'=r-0' „d o.~.m.~,. .,~., VAN DAELE DEVFLOPMINICDRPDAA710N RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA ~.,.~ enorrr s~ iw~r~m PLAN 2 ~~~ SryleA Spanvh ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,.....~.,.~.,,.. o.<~.-~.__ ,~~m VAN DAEI.E DEVEI.(IPMENT CORPORATION Ewa M~, ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA -~;~ Bear Sri uaLr-~ W _ ~ ~ RIGfRSE)E PLAN 4 BMffiau SlyleB-EmtyCnl~famm ETIWANDA ESTATES _~ VAN DAELE DEVELOPMEMCORPORATION M^Lxa RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA n B a U U z 0 a V 7 U O 2 V z • ` I I I hI '~ , i I I - ni,,, I ~~ I I , I l ! ~ , °,,'1'i~i;~ f I~III~I ~~ ~, ~, N 3~ .-., ~[', Rv V ~s' ~~a z 0 F Q~ O s 0 0 ~`1~ W txoxr Sak IN`I'-0' PLAN 2 SryleD-GlJaniaBwgabn ETIWANDA ESTATES .,.....~.,-.~.,,.. o..-....~.... .~~.. VAN DAELE DEVEIAPMEM'CORPoMTION ~~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA :~° ! ! i `Y `Q CT~~ W ffCONDFL00R eero raa nnH ®Elurl p® wmr N74AR ,~ note rumrm~ ~ nnn ~1 p ___ ~ _ ___J )GlilAIFY ~____ ___~1 fJJIIR ~ ~ l l HIw li mN Eb1 RIM I IfM1Rlml ~ 19180 RIIVI \ HIW FIRITFIAOR ETIWANDA ESTATES mminui ~.......,.rl,.,,d o.eR,..,m„ .... VAN DAk1E DEYEI.DPMFMCORPoRA710N ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA .... PLAN 3 11drn<.1lE~uR,69o91 t¢ d~ RS,1mgm• SECONDFLOOR=1,911 SF roru=l,nsSF G,I,WGE= 611 SF Smle Ill'=1'-0' e M pgpgpg 5 a //~/~ V V! ~ WO U V l~~//~~' _ VI Q r•1 K ~ ct~I G~ v =s 0 u 6 4 !~ 0 0 2 ~-, ~, ~ ~o ~1l--~ WT T FROM Soak 114`-I'4P REAR IEFf SIDE RIGNf SDIE PLAN 3 ~ro~R-~Y~uI~ ETIWANDA ESTATES twee. evarncn.~o.~oo~-~o» >~i~ VAN DAELEDEVEIAPMENT CORPORATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA~CA »».~ e a O g a a M Z Q U ~~ h ~~ a u v W o U l _ rr^^ U Vl a~ (~~: QO CQ a O CJ E `s 0 0 aP R U >0 F k m u ~, /~~ ~ ~~ Q ~xaur say ua~r~ E ~~~.. 4AN DAfLE PLAN 3 Sryk ~ - Caly~moa 9wgalo w ANDA ESTATES 1M"~,'1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA .~.. C _ wm11 I ________________________________ ~~ Mip __ OpH~M __ p AIL __I 611A/ O - - Qf PfSpHf x./0011 f FAIflltl01 ~~~ k11FA wlw Irflw wlw wlw Inlw IVSRI MI9 ~ ~. „ I ' ~ OFD .'. SIG ~lG ___ V111n ____ _I _ '~ _ ______________ _ ' M1A ~ ~ ~lL u@U11110117 i~ _ ___ I ,~ _ , , ~~ Jfllr~y - n I~ „ r lWLY_f T 'b4 YvP -- .wwf =9 ___ , ~~ ___ -' _ ~ i wIM1 ~~ __ _ I_____________ ~ •~ - -~ ~ ~ CIIII! I _ii ~Y' ~ ®EIlYI ~ ~ QmlGtll~l ' PfIPf ~~ I I' PIIP! ~~ I ~~] f I______________""_. __I. ~~ ~ ~~~~ i ~ I _ .. _ _- ____ f ___________ ___ ______ ~ QIhPCdv , ~ ~~ li 'A Cliw S _ ' ~ ~ _ - Qleist µ'~'N q}rMP wlw • ~~ u SEfGNDFlAGR FfRSfFL00R ETIWANDA ESTATES ~,,,,,,,,e,.,,,,,., o.~,,,.~P,,, ,~~e VAN DAEIE UEVFL(IPMFM(bRPORATi(IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA .~- PLAN 4 11mgm . f7RtiTFL00R=1,991SF SEWADFLDOR=1,110Sf 117U6=1,111SF CRR1GE=61tSF Sm6 IM'=I'-0' a a V a a U R V z 0 E a U U O S U Z rr~1 L_J in 1 4 O a ~/ ~i ~ ~~ v- 2~ ~~~ N h K ~~~ 0 `s 0 0 FlIOM Sak Ild`-I'-0' ~1" FROM Sdr 114`-I'-0' PLAN 4 F7ewpan SryleC•FmmMwe LFfT SmE -"mss" - ®~ ~ RIGMSIOE ETIWANDA ESTATES ,~~m VAN DAELE DEVFIAPMENT CORPORATION M,.~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA .„„ ,;•°~ • • p +r w ,~ a `i v a ~h e ~ o a. U Cal Z O E Q V 7 V O S U Z a a 0 F 0 U S~ E O ~C{ a G 0 U 2 0 a F k a /' / ~~ ~ `'ti7 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m. Vance Pomeroy November 2, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 58 lots within the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units peracre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58. Related Files: Development Review DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-01002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701. a~~i~~rn~ ind/Desicn Parameters• This protect is the site of a plant nurserywith a varietyoftrees and Eucalyptus windrows. The historic Brownless House will be demolished as part of the development The site is bounded on the north by, and includes a connection to, the future Pacific Electnc Inland Empire Trail. The applicant is proposing four house designs for the project designed to meet the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in which the site is located. Under the Etiwanda Specific Plan, this tract is developed underthe Basic Development Standards and no specific architectural style is required, however, elements of the existing styles found in Etiwanda are required. The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on May 27, 2004, which was sparsely attended Generally, the audience was satisfied with the applicant's presentation and no new issues were raised. The applicant has been working attentively to resolve the issues that had been raised at the staff level, such as architecture, master planning, trail access, lot layout, etc. A mator issue for this project through the staff review phase has been architectural design. The original submittal provided for poor definition between styles, minimal detailing, and a lack of 360-degree design sensibility. The revised architectural designs provided for the Development Review Committee (DRC) represent a substantial improvement. a. The four styles provided in compliance with the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Farmhouse, Califomia Bungalow, Spanish, and Early Califomia are distinguished by not only applied features but also vanation in matenals, roof shape, roof pitch, eave treatment, certain massing differences, and fenestration. Differentiation between the Early Califomia and the Spanish styles is made by denying the pnmary elements of the historical Spanish Colonial Revival (arches, ironwork, etc) from the 1920's into the Spanish style and using Mission and Monterey elements (balconies, wood details, open rafter tails, etc.) for the Early Califomia style. b. Substantial detailing is evident on all four styles by the ncher use of matenals. The Farmhouse style, for example, now shows an extensive use of wood siding with some stone accents where stucco was the only matenal before. c. Appropnate treatment of all elevations with the features, massing and detailing for the four styles, is presented. ~ ~ ,~ ~,l~,f~ !~~' DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. • November 2, 2004 Page 2 Based on the requirements of CEQA and Exhibit V-13 of the City's General Plan, a noise study was conducted by an acoustical engineer to address the potential impact of the noise from the Interstate 15 Freeway and Base Line Road on the residential uses proposed in this project. The engineer found that the traffic-related noise from Base Line Road is a source of significant noise impacts unless a sound wall 8 feet high relative to the pad height is constructed between Base Line Road and the back yarcJs of those lots along the sVeet in addition to any sound-deadening modifications that can be made to the houses. A Vanance is requested for the additional height to reduce the noise impacts to a level considered Tess-than-significant. Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues a A temporary detention basin is proposed on Lots 56-59 because mayor stone drain infrastructure does not exist in this area. These four lots rear-on to Base Line Road; hence, are prominent Planning Department's preference would be relocating basin to Lots 1-4. This would allow construction of homes on 6 out of 7 lots along Base Line Road creabng a more finished-looking streetscene Further, at such time as basin is removed and homes built, the construction of homes on Lots 1-4 would have less impact on surrounding neighborhood. Second=ry issues• Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the . Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The southeastern portion of the project site abuts the southbound Interstate 15 Freeway off-ramp for Base Line Road. Because the off-ramp is slated for re-configuration that will place it closer to the back yards of proposed Lots 48 through 54, a disclosure to the prospective buyers by the developer should be made that such a change is planned for the future. 2. A detention basin, similar to the basin required and constructed for the adjacent tract to the east, is proposed to occupy proposed Lots 56 through 59. The noise attenuation wall proposed for the penmeter along Base Line Road should be constructed at the same time as for the other lots to provide a consistent streetscape design for Base Line Road. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: No outstanding policy issues. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the Committee review the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with the above conditions. Attachments Design Review Committee Action;. Members Present. Coleman, Fletcher, Stewart, • Staff Planner. Vance Pomeroy yj DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. • November 2, 2004 Page 3 The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to the following conditions and revisions• 1. The northerly penmeter of the temporary detention basin shall be improved in a manner similarly proposed forthe front yards of the residences. The basin shall be also improved with a wrought iron fence and landscaping. 2 The sound wall shall be included in the improvement of the temporary deten4on basin lots. 3. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to investigate providing a trail access atthe end of the most northeasterly cul-de-sac (now known as Street "C"). ~I I • a 1 s • • • • to 2- ~ YI X ~ ] ,~ I . A , 'k ,,, ~,a • ~ •na. • ~ /\~' ~\\ 1 1~~ ~ \ e 1. ~1 I iil l '.I a 'eD I m I~ ~ I i 1 \4 'R ~-- I a { L t i , ~'~ •1 ~~~, f t ~ ® e® ® Ra Z ~ ~ su eu I ~ ~ ~ ~. u " I \ ~~~ .R 14 1 1 ,~ ~.. `i fia I, \p\I, ~I ~ ~N n L ', , ~I, ~ ee 1 ' ~q ijl 4 ;'i m .~ • j1`* ® mar r S. I~ * ` ~ hl N ,i \ __ .~ 1 I r `~.. ~ mill ~ 1 i . i ; `,<~I to ~ ~ e, Ri ' _ ~\ 1 -~ ,, ]~~ ~. ' UY1 . i i5~. ;iI ~ i ;~ ~ ` _ ~ .,a _. ~ , ..M, ~ ~ '4MP • r~ ~ _.* L 'III ~ ` ~ ~ ~" e - ` f ~,; ~ ~~.h 1 t I Ij ~--- ~, qn -.. -;,._`~. F ~ nI ,, 'Iii :,,,;.. ~ . ,,~.~~ ~~:~ I,~~ II I1 y, ,; ~~ ~ D i IP 1 ' 1 - mm • e I ~ • - ® '° ® Q 11 Y Y a• d' IR IR N n ~ i e I IIF7 1 ua Na ~~~ ~ Z • GryW Rendro Gmencnpe R'enNnp (NHakn ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Application Number /orthe project to which this form peRalns TT 1671 Pro/ea idle T T N o 1 b77 b C uc4MOnga R. dSe !1 J NameBAddressofprolectowner(s) LOVfh qNd Qq/7q/9 ~v~ h3 FtitQq CIQYk Ed~l-,~~0~, 1310Y (3GSe~~nP R~ (Le~cL,e Cucaw~d~lu lla`6 '~ecati(7yQr Qauc~+~ Cuco~-e~f~ NameBAddressoldeveloperorproJeIXSponsor IIO/1 D0.tlt ~eMMJni~<3t I.LL 2900 Atlnn-3 ,$fYed- C-2S ital</S~[ CPr g2SO4 1~ Contact PersonBAddress vteue r, n +~*~~~- ?~f00 Adam3 Sfiie.et C- 2r R1kr3?le L/r RZSa`I 221 5. 6lassell Slrcd(" Name 6 Address of person PrePenng this (orrrr (d dl)ferent born above) J'C/1S "(hP2iYrcnn ~ ~JYiielnueM f~'1~jbtCeYs 02v~ e fR 928 ~ k Teleph~ Number _ rr ntallydoFannl doe 7iy 7~1y- 97ao paw ~ Created on 5122/2002 4 09 PM ~i ~i ~ ~3 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED P/ease note thaNt rs the responmbrbry of me appacanr to ensure mat the appl~cabon Is complete at the bme of submittal, Crty staN wdl not be evadable to perform work required fo provide mrssrng rnlormabon ,PROJECT INFORMATION 8 DESCRIPTION; on indicated by an astedsk (•) !s not required of non-conshucbon CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Pmwde a full scale (&1!1 x 11) copy o~fhe USGS Quadre t Sheet w ~rGh mdudes the project site, and md~cate the sde boundanes ¢~~-~-,rC-~i~t~t ~~+~4 ~~~-.l 2) Prewde a set of color photographs that show representahve wows f~ the sde from the north, south. east and west' wows in o and >~ the site from the pnmary access points that serve the site, and representative wows of significant features LiQrr the site Indude a map showing location of each photograph 3) Prged Location (desrnbe) &,~~ ~,~/gnat ~e awA ~L)r /h1L~dt~ Ne/'h. dp ~c4Selr~t. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addRional sheet d necessary) 0'j~' } I3 ~ ~ Zq ~ 3 y, 35 , 3 b. $2 , $,3 022'1 131- SS+s4 f57~ s8 ..,A~Z~_S~gAp.~O •5) Gross Site Area (eds9 ft) / 9 ~ _I.S____~..~- ~ G !~" ~ 7 5• F •ti) Net Site Area (total sde size minus area of public sheets 8 proposed dedications) I $.13 A-o~7 S 9 842 5. F. ~1~-r 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach add~bonal sheet d necessary) /VONE 8) Indude a descnphon of all permtts which wdl be necessary Irom the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes in order ro fully implement the piolect T~+cl' Ma G,-adl•+'f ner~rl~' ~„cvaac~heR~'~'..,,„;f sw or . 8) Descnbe ttie physical setting of the site as h exists before the pro/ed inducting informetlon on topography, saJl ews6 g sWctures on site (induct ng age and icondrbon) and the us~ the shudures~Attach ph~otogreph~ any significant features descnbed In addition, cite all sources of mfamabon (~ e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, trelfic studres 71v n><~ it Ga o~Pr4 jHl nurrP~y qN~ /f~/ 1"f//Y4~ r,.~oH~2irllPl awr~ nun,~ru~f ~-~rrs ~ r6/e. OHt exri IrI~ rlrirlp ~N+i ~ti r~fl d.NCP fi /ocWltc~ off fG* ~apPrf'z-T~/~rr.~/ / i-rrlc~~w`lo~ ~'v'rl JurvoyHr fl7P Yeli PyCC. r~ LJ FnNronmentallydoFOrm1 doe Page 2 Created on 5/22/2002 4'09 PM f~~~, ~ ~ /7N ~~//ltl~• 'Ly// CU~Y~/ J (`/Gl~/• 2Q/ GCYP r.~ hd/f~ o~ T~P nvuA*/~tn f`ircl~fi7 '~~-P f0) Desa+be the known cultural andror hlstoncal aspects of the ste Cde ell sources o/1n/ormahon (books, pubbshed reports and oral history) 11) Describe any nase sources and them levels that now affect the srte (alnxaR, roadway nose, etc) end how they will aJ1ecM proposed uses r / /f , 7h~e 1'YPfty p'7 O Ff rAn~ Gl ~? / ~6Je ~/NP /-'yPH(~ fvG FF(c cub7v~ ~ufx -f* na(se . 12) Describe the proposed pro/act 1n detail Thrs should prowde an adequate descnpbon of fhe Srfe In ferns of uldmate use that wdl result Irom the proposed pro/act Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, fhe extent of development to oaur with each phase, and the andapated completion o/each rncremenf Attach addrbonal sheet(s) dnecessary ~tP ,>ayo IPcA` w/L/ lie a r/H~lP ,,~/k1'? r~ ~P ~ONrhuc~~t~ -~ r~(f/sa k s~or~, _~/~w~, EnWronmenlallnfaForml doc Pape 3 Created on 5/2212002 4 99 PM f~( gr t~ ~ rl/~l I fir! bYtJDi/fG 41 OV~Y~Hh/I /'llte/ ~~dl./. ~~ 13) Desrnbe the surrounding propertes, including informahon on plants and animals and any cultural, htstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type ofland use (resrdenhal, commeraal, etc), intensity olland use (one-ramrty, apartment houses, shops, deparbnent stores, etc) end sa31e o/development (height Irontage, setbadr, rear yard, etc ) To tkt nor~L /v g yi~r+P ya`cP ><y ~t~Q n~vfye/4lt ultl o„rl- Ir 4 rrA1f%/ ~alM~~y Nrldfarr4~ lvl,~INtl6N . Te {'~iP fouS<~r rJ G r/ro//otP~ CflnQO+~/vlluH+'1Y01~cf` unq~~ C/an If YuC~/?h 7U f~f wPlf 4yP JPVC4~~ ~w(,~I VlolUal l7Urhol O4 ~Gvf~' ~U77 14) Will the proposed pmlect change the pattern, scale or character of the surroundlg general area of the preJed7 7~~ n~oJec~ wl~ll c l7GNF >i~t° c~igvu~frv aCron+ A corn+~evrlc~~ tiuvrfry fo 4 frs, r~P 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-term nase to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How wdl these nase levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing ere proposed? S~ioil- ~4Prlr vla( rP wry ~P Sr,s-t-~~t~ Lh r J i _. yJC /Tdi, /n ! ~r'rr+ ?'YOM ~v~lkr9 A /74t4/I//P GvL~ ttr'~'t'flC lvr// b~ r>t r !7 f 4 W I ~ 1'd/!h®4/4 ~~1. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o/ mature or scenic trees 7] r j /'t FC' / / G lt1//I[/ qM~ I/ ~/I~ OF ~vPl~ oCer safe, Ie~tcre~ L,~,- /kv tlbflt° yr//~fNcP w4,c~ ~(Il /jUJ~ (p ~/~e~ /~/4Cl~CHf d ~ O-t° fh-Pe~ / I~P2 ~'jrr hd-a hun,e wr ~/ va r ~tfo ~t ~ht '{Yt~ /o.rY• 1 ~ Indicate any bodies o1 water (mcludmg domesdc water supplies) Into which the site drelns ~ ruins y,, /f ~ G fl7 Maf~ey t~/~hnP~ ~d rra ~,~a /n FsdronmentellnfaFonnl doe Pap~J ~/ ~ ~ Created on 5/222002 0 09 PM 18) Indlcafeexpectedamountofwaferusage (SeeAttachmentAforusageeshmates) For furtherclanficahon,please _ contact the Cucamonga County Water D~stnct at 987-2591 M a Readenhal (ga!/day)~ Peak use (gaUDey) ~ ~i_ D Commeroral/Ind (gal/day/ac) - Peak use (gaVm~Nac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Sephc Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolahon tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system Is proposed md~cafe expected daily sewage generehon (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dlstnct at 987-259`1 a Resldenhal (gal/day) ~/~ b CommeraaUlndushral (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: p 20) Number ofresrdenhalunrts o 7y~p~ ~ 20 D0O Detach d (militate range of parcel sizes, mrmmum lot sire and maximum lot size r S,C. the pnd~cate whetherunrts ere rental orforsale units) /(l 0 rJ~ 21) Anhapated range of sale pnces and/o! rents sale Pnce(s) S ro S pTr/2M/A/e'rJ rvoT yer O Rent (permonCQ S to E 22) Spealy number of bednwms by unit type P-G, ~ 3 br 2 4 b~ 3 5hr ti w h /' 231 Indicate anhapaled household srze by unlt type FsvlronmentellnfoFOrmt dot PI a h '~- - y Z y 3 S `1 3 Pape 5 Created on 5/22!2002 4 09 PM ~~/!• - 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wtll be residing wdhin the pro/ect Confect the appropriate Schod D~stncts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Semor High 25) Describe type of use(s) and melon funchon(s) of commercial, industrial or rnshtudonel uses 26) Total area o/commercial, industrial, orinstdutional uses by type 27) Indicate hours 28) Number of employees Total Maximum ShHF Time o axlmum ShAt 29) Pmwde breakdown of anhcipated /ob da canons, indudmg wage end salary ranges, as well as an ind~cahon of the rate o/hire Ion each classification (attach addiho / sheet ll necessary) 30) Eshmahon of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside In the •31) Fa commercial and fndushral uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o !r polluhon emissions (Data should be verified threugh the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-62 EnvlronmentallnloForm7 clot Pa08{µ6 Created on 5rt 002 4 08 PM /~ ~'// ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies sernng the pro/act been contacted to detennrne them abtlrty to provide adequate service to Me p/rfoposed[t pm/ect7 If so, please rnd~cate t~hCem response l C,,u+~,eef4 IVVwT~ l./a~r ~/~~YICI 'f~dICO~PI fQ(NP/ d'~ r4~ti C'~w ~/P~Jl~oVi c~?® br~ /~[f tu}- (P ~ /IIGPd p' ~twf(~ r-Pt~vc °%/~rti d 1=wr: ~~// h*L reyrPweO du~thJ /TTH Il`C/CPIr ~~GaCY c07~'dI hf/ '/PP4 CIItCfl1)"Oa~ url'1 ---. 7{~ Gr•~tt . 33) In the known history of this property; has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limned to PCB's, redioachve substances, pesdades and herbicides, fuels, ads, solvents, and other flammable liquids end gases Also note underground storage of any o/ the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known , pJdF /~r•k`tdwy hau/rv.t- fle r//l(' // a hvrrPvy pub ~.Gy hat-P~ /coA ~i~b/t•/!r/ G'aO c0~/~i~f4/P/ 34) l~Yill the proposed protect invohre the temporary orlong-fern use, storage or discharge of hazarcous and/or toxic materials, including but not l~mded to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials ro be used and proposed method of disposal The locahon of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown end labeled on the appl~cahon plans No k.C I hereby certrly that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and rnformahon required for adequate evaluadon ofthispro/act to the best ofmy abildy, thatthe /acts, statements, end rnformahon presentedare true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that adddional information may be required to be submitted be%re an adequate evaluadon can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date ~~ ~ ~~ U Signature. D/1'"i //~'~~ rlue C f // ~ L-~N6 /A/~~>L EnNronmentallnfoFoiml doc Pape ~ ~J ~ ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM i i i ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga '= ~ - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Tentative Tract SUBTT16776 2. Related Files: Development Review DRC2004-00052, Vanance DRC2004-1002, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16776 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 58 lots within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling unrts per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN• 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052 - VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION -The review of silo plan and elevations for 58 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the within the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling unrts per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN. 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58. VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - A request for an increase in wall height related to 58 single-family homes on 19 acres of land within the within the Low-Medwm Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55-58. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Van Daele Development Corporation 2900 Adams Street, Suite C-25 Riverside, CA 92504 5. General Plan Designation: Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low-Medium Residential Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The protect site is located on the north side of Base Lme Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, on the site of a landscape nursery. A vineyard lies north of the site. An abandoned railroad corrador (train tracks have been removed) runs along the site's northerly border and is planned to be the Pacific Electric Inland Empire regional trail and future transit corradory~ To the east are single-family residences, a ~! `J/ ~ ~ l Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 vacant parcel, and the southbound Base Line Road off ramp of the I-15 Freeway. To the west is pnmanly vacant land with a couple of single-family residences near Base Line Road. South of the project site is Base Line Road, further south of which is a condominium protect under construction. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Vance Pomeroy, Contact Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Regional Water Quality ConVol Board -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Discharge Pennit City of Rancho Cucamonga Vanance GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Boats SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS2002 -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 • (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources (/) Hazards & Hazardous Matenals ()Mineral Resources (/) public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise (/) Recreation (/) Mandatory Fmd~ngs of Significance (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning (/) Population/Housing (/) Transportation/Traffic ~..~ fig, ~ (,za Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 Page 3 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions m the protect have been made by agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO wdl a prepared. Prepared By: nd Lon dbum o oration Date. i Reviewed B : ~ Date: Z ~/ r~ LJ ~ ~- ~3 ~-, ~, Indial Study for SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~9Po",,,~~,'„ Less Tien u,wweuan Las sp„em,v Ne i a gee i i 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project a) Have a substantial affect on a scenic vista? () () () (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, () () (~) () including, but not limited to, trees, rods outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing casual O O (~) ( ) character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a, b) According to the City's General Plan, the protect site is not wthin a scenic vista/scenic highway view corridor Although the protect will result in the removal of trees and the demolition of a 1907 structure previously identified in the 1987 survey, nearby streets including local portions of Interstate 15, Base Line Road, and Etiwanda Avenue are not considered scenic routes, the trees are subtect to replacement and the 1907 house does not appear to meet the city's criteria for landmark status No impact would result c) The proposed project includes the development of 58 single-family homes on 19 acres of land. The protect site is designated Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 units per acre) This development would be consistent with the surrounding land uses The visual character of the site would be harmonious to its neighboring residents The proposed protect would not impact the aesthetic significant aesthetic environment of the area d) The protect would create new light and glare because there would be a greater number of houses and residents utilizing lights in various forms There would be the addition of street lamps as well The design and placement of street lamps must be shown on site plans, and would be reviewed for consistency with City standards Since the site would produce similar effects as the present surroundings, it is not considered remarkable; the impact would be less than significant. C~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~~„ Less men ~~ ~, Less s~ , w i a uo i ~ 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would fhe project a) Convert Pnme Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (~) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agncultural use? b) Conflict wdh existing zoning for agncultural use, () () () (~) or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing () () () (~) environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Pnme Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance There are approximately 1,300 acres of Pnme Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is charactenzed by existing and planned development. Furthermore, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland according to the General Plan Land Use Plan The site ~s not within this area. However, the General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. b) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned for agncultural uses and no Williamson Act contracts within the City There is no impact. c) The proposed 19-acre project site is currently used as a planbtree nursery and would be cleared to allow the development of 58 single-family homes within the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan. No impact would occur since farmland would not be changed, converted, or otherwise affected. ~~~~ ~ ~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources °dp1tl80y aw+e~i Lms mr, ~~"~~ ~n wnpaom ua '~ spnscmi No i ~~ i 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ecF a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () (/) ( ) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net () () (/) ( ) increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitwe receptors to substantial () () (/) ( ) pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments: a, b, c)As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State air quality standards The General Plan FEIR identified the atywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The proposed development of 58 single-family homes on 19 acres located between Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 Freeway on the north side of Base Line Road, would contribute to pollutant levels in the area during construction and prolect operations. Construction emissions were screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures The URBEMIS 2002 program was used to evaluate the proposed project The model separates emissions estimated based on the phases of constriction activity and the year in which the particular activity will transpire. The criteria pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), rnVous oxides (NO.), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) The emission levels listed reflect the estimated winter season levels, which are nonnally higher due to increased use of heating systems. The three classic construction phases for most protects are demolition, site grading, and budding URBEMIS 2002 calculates emissions assuming the three phases do not overlap. It was assumed that construction of the site would begin in 2005 and be completed by 2006. The protect site was screened under its proposed ~-~1 LJ J !ri /~~ ~ U/lO Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 7 • land use of Low-Medwm Residential Furthermore, two houses wdl be demolished and the 19-acre site would ultimately contain 58 single-family houses. Tables 1A and 1 B list emissions for 2005 Table 1 URBEMIS2002 Site Grading Emissions Summary (Pounds oer Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM~a Mit Mit. Mit. Mit Demolition - - - - Site Gradin ROG NOx CO PM~o Fu hive Dust - - - 20.00 Off-Road Diesel 17 23 144.19 118.01 6 72 On-Road Diesel 0 19 0.37 3.93 0.00 Worker Tn s 17.42 0.37 3.93 0.02 Total 34 84 144 93 121.4 26.74 SCAQMD Thres. 75 100 550 150 Si nificance No Yes No No Table 1A Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds oer Dav) Source ROG NO CO PM c Mit. Mit Mit. Mit Bldg Const 14.11 114.73 99 27 5.28 Worker Tn s 0.28 0 16 3 36 0.04 Arch Coatin 237.04 - - t) 04 As halt 0 65 264 0 50 0 O6 Total 252.08 117 53 103.13 5.42 SCAQMD Thres 75 100 550 150 Si rnficence Yes Yes No No Dunng grading activities, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment and fugitive dust generated by egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NOxand PM,o levels in the area. As shown in Table 1, emissions for NOx would be exceeded. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce impacts. 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District and Regional Water Quality Control Board) dally to reduce PM„ emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. Initial Study for SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 8 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed • 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was Investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. As indicated in Table 1A, the construction emissions exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for lwo of the four cnteria air pollutants, ROG and NO.. The construction of the site is anticipated to exceed threshold levels However, the construction emissions are short tens (approximately eight months), and wdl be below threshold levels as indicated in Table 2, post-construction phase. The following mitigations measures wdl reduce impacts: 6) Ali construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and Initiate on site when appropriate or as soon as feasible: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. ~~ ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 9 • • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-Inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 10) Construction contractors shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 11) Construction contractors shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in the Table 2, emissions assocated with post-construction activities and would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Development of the 19-acre site, to include 58 single-family houses, will create an additional 628 daily traps Emissions associated with the proposed land use would not exceed SCAQMD threshold for critena pollutants and would therefore be less than sigmficent. • Table 2 URBEMIS 2002 Operations Emissions Summary /D.. ..A~ or nw1 Source ROG ~ v~.~ NO, . - CO PM~o Unmet Mit Unmet. Met Unmd Met Unmet. Met Area Source 2 89 2.89 0.74 0.74 1 02 1.02 0 00 0.00 Mobile Source 6.91 6.91 7.36 7.36 85 23 85 23 6 40 6 40 Totals 9.89 9 89 8 10 8.10 86.25 86 25 6.40 6.40 SCAQMD 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Thres. Si nificence No No No No No No No No d,e) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term healthcare faalities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. Nearby sensitive receptors include residential neighborhoods to the east, northeast, west and the residences under construction immediately south of Base Line Road. Once construction is complete, post-construction emission levels are well below SCAQMD thresholds as indicated in Table 2. The proposed residential development would not generate objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are antiGpated P/~rTr Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 10 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~~„ ~' µ,°°„~, ~®,,, w i ba 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly () () () (/) or through habitat modifications, on any speces identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speaal status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on npanan () () U (/) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, polices, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, venial pool, coastal, etc) through dared removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corndors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local polices or ordinances () (/) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) ConFlid with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments• a,b) The 19-acre project site is currently a working planUtree nursery surrounded by existing and proposed residential development, and vacant land According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3, the site does not occur within area boundary of any sensitive biological resources. • c) No wetland habitat is present on site. No impact would occur. d) The proled site is currently used as a landscape nursery. Residential land uses • and vacant land surround the proled site to the east, west, and south, and Base ~C~,ff~D Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 11 . Line Road occurs to the south of the site The surrounding areas would not serve as a wildlife comdor, no impact is prolected e,f) The southern half of the protect site is currently used as a landscape nursery. A vanety of mature trees exist on the property, including Red Gum Eucalyptus windrows along the eastern property boundary, and near the center of the site. An Arborist Report (Sims, March 31, 2004) was prepared for the site to evaluate the health of on-site trees The report documents 60 hentage trees on the property, including 45 Red Gum Eucalyptus. Other trees include Modesto Ash (5), Ligwdambar (4), Ornamental Pear (2), Brachychiton (1), Monterey Pine (1), Mondell Pine (1), and Blue Atlas Cedar (1). The arbonst recommended removal of all trees, except for the Blue Atlas Cedar The report concluded that on-site trees posed a safety hazard, due to the multiple topping, which permits decay and increases the potential for branch failures. Since eucalyptus trees are protected by the City Tree Preservation Ordinance, removal of the trees is considered significant However, implementation of mitigation measures listed below would reduce this impact to less than significant 1) New eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to replace existing red gum eucalyptus trees in the manner specified in the New Windrow Planting Guidelines within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. • 2) The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation supervised by a licensed arbonst. Said tree shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of tree to protect against decay and disease. Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence prior to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permit, grading or building permit. Protective fencing shall remain in place during all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the written consent of City Planner until construction is complete. The protect site is surrounded by single-family residential and vacant land, and is within the Low-Medium Residential District The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to General Plan, Exhibit IV-4, Open Space and Conservation Plan No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. r1 LJ ~i l~~ If 7/ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~, '' uo gyn., Nµ~,,,, ~. s~amn ra i a ib ~ 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () (/) ( ) significance of a histoncel resource as defined in § 15064 5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique () (/) () ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those () (/) () ( ) interred outside of formal cemetenes7 Comments: a) As concluded in the Cultural Report prepared by MBA on July 29, 2004, the prolect site does not appear to qualify as a "Historic Resource" per the criteria of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation) Additionally, the site is located in an area that is nearly surrounded by development, and, to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vanity of the prolect site No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area No adverse impacts are anticipated. b,d) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the project site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) Construction activities, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retaln a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require Incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. ~~ ~~ f }' "/ aZ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 13 • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) Upon human remains encountered during excavation associated with this project, all work will halt and the County Coroner will be notified (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resource Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted. This commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations. This may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. c) According to the San Bernardino County Museum database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the proiect site; however, the area has a high sensitiwty rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited dunng the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000.100,000 years ago dunng the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary penod, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The proiect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvwm per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures will be implemented: 3) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. r 1 U ~~j ~ /~ Indial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 14 Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~~,,; ~,~ ~, ~+ s„'~Nnw,,, ra i a yea i ~ 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, inGuding the risk of loss, iniury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Algwst-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () (~) ( ) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (~) liquefaction9 iv) Landslides? () () () (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () () (~) ( ) topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (~) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Bwlding Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have sods incapable of adequately supporting () () () (~) the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ~~~f~ ~y Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pace 15 Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 1.9 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2.9 miles northwest. These faults are both capable of producing a moment magnitude (Mw) 6.0 - 7.0 earthquake, respectively Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 16 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producng up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 18 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking and fault rupture. The applicant will be regwred to conform to the Uniform Building Code to ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant According to the General Plan EIR, there are three types of ground failure that could occur within the City liquefaction, differential compaction, and subsidence Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less sods are subject to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface Based on ground water depths within the area (an average of 400 to 500 feet below ground surface, the potential for liquefaction within the project area is unlikely In addition, Figure 5 1-2 of the General Plan EIR identifies only a few isolated areas in the City where liquefaction could occur These areas are located in the southwest portion of the City near Red Hdl. The proposed protect is not within this area Differential compaction is the term used to describe areas prone to different rates of surface settling, with or without seismic shaking, which are underlain by sediments that differ laterally in composition or degree of ewsting compaction The General Plan EIR identified the former marsh areas of Red Hdl as the only area within the City limits that is likely subted to this potential hazard. The protect site is not within this area. According to the General Plan EIR, the only portions of the City that are subtect to potential landslides or slope failure are in the northwest comer of the City and the foothills north of the City limits. These areas have some slopes steeper than 25 percent, and include Red Hill, the bluffs along upper Cucamonga Creek, and the foothills at the north edge of the City. The possibility of a landslide in one of the canyons resulting in a damaging mudflow is remote because thick sods have not accumulated in the canyons The protect site is not subiect to landslides or mudflows as it is in an area that is relatively flat and developed with urban uses b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions from September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of'this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and ~i r~i ~ /~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 landscaping are established Mitigation measures listed in the air section of this Initial Study would make this impact less than significant. c) Subsidence is the general lowering of elevation that may result from withdrawal of fluids from the ground or movement in the earth's crust. Widespread subsidence, on the order of one to two feet, has been predicted for the southern part of the City The project site is not located in the southem portion of the City and therefore is not subject to subsidence, there are no known indications that this is occumng d) A seiche is an oscillation of water in a lake, reservoir or other water body The project site is not located near a surface water body Therefore development of the site would not expose people or structures to any potential seiche impacts The site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Exhibit V-5 of the City's General Plan The nearest open channel, according to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit V-6, is located near the northern boundary of the site. The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. e) The proposed development would connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PoViO"Y s~a+e~i ~pM°°'" m wnoau«, "'°° s+a+~~~ rw i ~w i i d 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: () () (/) ( ) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () (/) ( ) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident considerations involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous () () (/) ( ) or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an ewsting or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ~/ NJ ~ / Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 17 Issues and Supporting Information Sources SipNfitdnt N~A4tl~GOn Sip ®n~ No i a m red i i a e) For a project located within an airport land use () () () (/) plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private () () () (/) airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere () () () (/) with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk () () () (/) of loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wddlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wddlands? Comments: a,b,c) Since about 1961 to present day, the property has been used as a landscape nursery. On December 22, 2003, LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc conducted a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Although the testing found trace levels of soil contaminants, no significant organochlonne pesticides were present in the near-surface sods All levels reported were below EPA's preliminary remediaUon goals for residential sods. Furthermore, no additional tests were deemed necessary. A Phase II ESA has been conducted by the Applicant. Any findings regarding demolition of existing on-site structures will become conditions of budding permit issuance. The potential for significant impacts to the public, from the site is determined to be less than sign~fcent d) The protect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact would result from development of the site e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within two miles of a public airport. Protect site is located approximately three miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. There is no impact. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's MuIU-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes polices and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 18 Fire District in the event of a disaster Access to the site is by Base Line Road. No impact is anticipated. h) According to the Fire Distnct Strategic Plan 2000-2005, Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-dnven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City According to General Plan Exhibit V-7, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area. Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~Poau"fi~,,; ~..~ nun Nwn~um u.+ yo„~ No ~ m ua i i s 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would fhe project: O U U (/) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () 0 () (/) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () (/) ( ) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () (/) ( ) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off- site7 e) Create or conVibute runoff water which would () () (/) ( ) exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () (/) 0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard () () () (/) area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? /~, ~3, H X18 • Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 19 lm Then Lem Issues and Supporting Information Sources raenualy Sigmfiont Slptlfi°"' N Mingahon Then SlgNfimnl No I q I tetl I tl I d i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk () () () (/) of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments: a,e,f) The project applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004 The WQMP identified the Best Management Practices (BMP's) or pollution control measures that would be implemented onto the site in order to reduce the possibility of pollutants entering drainage systems and disruption water quality Od, trash, debns, grease, organic compounds, pesticides, or sediment from landscaped areas are a few of the typical pollutants related with residential developments Source control BMP's include low-flow head sprinklers in front yards, as well as landscaped and vegetated swales, pamphlets distributed to each homeowner encouraging the use of drought tolerant landscaping and low-flow irngation for backyards The Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct (CVWD) would provide water and sewer service The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The WQMP identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/get separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the stone drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Actiwties~ 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of i~il3, ~ X19 Initial Study for SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 20 ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall Include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the Issuance of grading permits. b) According to General Plan Exhibit IV-2, the proposed prolect would not deplete groundwater supplies nor would it interfere with recharge since it is not Hnthm an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground The development of the site would require grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. The CVWD, which oversees any groundwater pumping or recharge activities, would supply water for the proposed development Therefore no impact to groundwater supplies would result c,d) THe Drainage Report, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 22, 2004, indicates that the existing storm dram facilities are insufficient to handle the flows anticipated after project completion. The report substantiates the need and provides for the design of a detention basin to handle the anticipated flows The proposed protect would cause changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new . bwlding and hardscape proposed on site; however, the protect wdl not alter the course of any sVeam or aver. The protect design includes an on-site detention ~i ~~ ~ ~d Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 21 basin that is designed to handle the flows. The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion The Bwlding Official and City Engineer must approve a grading and drainage plan pnor to the issuance of grading permits The protect would not result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on- or off-site. The impacts from drainage would be less than signrficant. g,h) According to General Plan Exhibit V-5, the protect site is not located within a 100- yearflood hazard area No adverse impacts would result The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to accommodate a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 According to General Plan Exhibit V-5, the protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area No adverse impacts would result. t) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not antiapated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of insignificance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Issues and Supporting Informatwn Sources ~,~„„~,,,; ,...men ~, µ~ ~, Lass ~,~ „e i a ua i a 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the protect. a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, () () () (~) or regulation of an agency with tunsdicbon over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, speGfic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (~) plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments• a) The project site is zoned as Low-Medwm Residential The protect includes the development of 19 acres into 58 lots of single-family homes. The project would not physically divide an established community Since it will be compatible with the zoning and immediate land uses, there is no impact. L. J b) The proposed protect was designed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; however, proposes a Vanance to increase ~? ~~~ ~/ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 22 perimeter wall heights to attenuate traffic noise from Base Line Road and the I-15 Freeway This wall height increase is necessary to comply with General Plan and Development Code standards for noise levels within residential neighborhoods Similar walls were constructed in 2004 along south side of this portion of Base Line Road by other housing developers. The proposed prolect of 58 single-family residences on 19 acres does not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency wdh junsdiction of the prolect for the purpose of avoiding mitigating an environmental effect Therefore, no impact would result c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Development will not adversely affect any rare or endangered speaes of plants or animals due to the fact that the proposed prolect would be surrounded by similar land uses to the south, west, and east. There are no applicable habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans that concern the project site. Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g "~°"'~'Y Signfl®nl ~ ~~ $1pN°°"' NMltlpetla, ~ ~ 71°° siyrtlflaun rro i a 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (~) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the City's General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; there is no impact. ~~ ~ ~ ~~- Initial Study for SUBTT16776 8 DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 23 Issues and Supporting Information Sources a~mm via m.. ,~~,µ~',b„ w+ ~ ~, ,,, ~~ 11. NOISE. Would the project result rn: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () (~) () ( ) levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agenaes? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of () () (~) ( ) excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient () () (~) ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the protect? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (~) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a protect located within an airport land use () () () (~) plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private () () () (~) airstrip, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The proposed project is the construction of 58 single-family residences immediate north of Base Line Road between Etiwanda and East Avenues. An Acoustical Analysis prepared by Gordon Bricken & Associates (GBA) indicated that traffic noise from Base Line Road, Interstate 15, and the southbound i-15 Freeway off ramp, would be the dominate noise sources for the area GBA reviewed the proposed protect to determine compliance with City of Rancho Cucamonga noise control requirements of an exterior noise level of 65 CNEL and an interior noise level of 45 CNEL CNEL is the sound level in dBA which corresponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hourpenod Exterior Noise Level u Future traffic data for Interstate 15 was received from Caltrans District 8. Base Line Road forecast traffic volumes were estimated from published City traffic data Expected future roadway noise impact was protected using the Federal Highway Administration's Highway Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77-108) Future traffic noise will exceed City, FHWA and Caltrans noise limits for exterior ~~ i~, ff ~3 Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 24 uses (e g. backyards) for units located along Base Line Road (Lot 1 and Lots 54 . through 58) and for units located along the east side of the site including Lots 47 through 53. The following mitigation measure will ensure exterior noise levels for these units are reduced to acceptable levels. 1) An acoustical sound wall will be required at a height of 6 feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce exterior noise levels at or below 65 CNEL. The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis. Walls heights greater than 8 feet shall require approval of a variance application. Intenor Noise Levels Most of the structures on the lots listed will be exposed to exterior noise levels as high as 74 dBA CNEL This will require Intenor noise reduction levels as high as 29 dBA Since standard construction materials would yield only around 20 dBA, speafic room calculations need to be carried out to determine the degree of additional mitigation needed The following mitigation measure would ensure interior noise levels for Lot 1, and Lots 47 through 58 would be reduced to an acceptable level. 2) Once building plans are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the building mitigation required to meet the • 45 dBA CNEL Interior noise standard. 3) The developer shall provide written notification to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road Interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary. The remainder of the lots will receive sufficient shielding from intervening houses and will not requre additional noise control measures beyond construction details contained in the acoustical analysis in order to comply with the interior City CNEL limit of 45 dBA. b,c) The project site as well as the surrounding area is zoned Low-Medium Residential Residential developments and vacant land exist to the west, east, northeast, and south of the protect Post construction activities would not generate noise levels that would vary from the surrounding land uses The proposed development would not result in significant or unexpected noise level increases in the area. d) Construction activities would increase ambient noise levels for the surrounding area. Residential uses occur west, east, northeast, and south of the site Implementations of the following mitigation measures would ensure short-term nose impacts are reduced to a less than significant level 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays. • Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 25 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Sa(d consultant will report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant would immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with city noise standards or halted. e,f) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and there are no public airports or pnvate airstnps near the site Airports and associated operations would not impact the site. Issues and Supportng Informatwn Sources ~°0; u:. mr~ m ~,~ ;, ~w s~~i ra i n yea i ~ 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project. a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () (~) ( ) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () (~) ( ) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments• a) The 19-acre project site would be developed with 58 new houses According to the City's Planning Department, approximately 3.183 people per residence are estimated. Based on this assumption, this would result in approximately 185 people are expected from the new development. Existing sewer and electncal service are located adjacent to the site and would serve the project No extensions of major infrastructures would be required. b, c) Two houses occur on-site, neither of which are occupied, and would be demolished to allow for construction of 58 single-family homes The impact is considered less than significant. /' / "'~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 26 Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~,~flent8°'W,,, gym., ~, µ,o'",~„ ~. ~„~'"„~„ ,,, i a tea 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated wrth the prows~on of new or physically altered govemmental facdit~es, need for new or physically altered governmental factl~ties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to ma~nta~n acceptable seN~ce ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public SBN/CBS: () () (~/) ( ) a) Fire protection b) Police protection? () () (~) ( ) c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Parks? O O (~) O e) Other public facdities7 () () (~) ( ) Comments• a) Fire Protection -The project site is located on the north side of Base Lme Road between Etiwanda and East Avenues There is a temporary fire station located on the north side of Base Line Road between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard west of the project site, however, a permanent fire station is under construction on west side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Base Lme Road, approximately the same driving distance from subject property. There is also a fire station north of the site on the west side of East Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. b) Police protection -The site would incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services. In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant will pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department (SBSD) and currently has 110 uniformed officers assigned to the City. With an estimated population of 154,800 people, the ratio of officers to citizens is approximately 1.1,400 The proposed project would generate approximately 185 people. This would result in a demand of less than a one percent increase in officers to maintain the City's current level of service The impact is considered less than significant. c) Schools -The proposed housing development would generate additional students for the local school districts Based on a total of 58 houses, 36 students would be generated in the Etiwanda School District and 16 high school students for Chaffey Joint Unified High School District The applicant would be required to pay appropriate impact fees. ~J C~ In addition to the primary and intermediate schools, the City of Rancho • Cucamonga includes three high schools within the Chaffey Joint Unified School ~i~/~~~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 27 Distract Capacity for the high schools is estimated at 15,485, but total enrollment was tabulated at 19,567 in year 2001. Portable classrooms are used to alleviate overcrowding problems Funding is the deterrent to faality expansion and the City and school districts are addressing the problem by requesting for State and federal funding. The City also meets the needs for schools by collecting developer school impact fees The elementary and the high school distracts share revenues generated by the school impact fees of which the developer will have pay the appropnate amount The proposed project would not have a significant impact on schools. d) Parks -The proposed housing development would not generate a substantial number of new people within the area. According to Figure III-10 of the City's General Plan, a neighborhood park, Windrows Park, exists northwest of the site on Victona Park Lane Developer Impact fees are collected at the time of budding permit issuance (see 14 a below) Therefore, the new development would not cause a significant impact to existing parks. e) Public facilities -The proposed development would incrementally impact traffic on adtacent sUeets According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the applicant would be required to pay appropriate development impact fees as adopted by the City Counal Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 aaenueuy Slpnlfl®nt i n Less Tun sa+nam M hstlpatlon tee Less lose 9pNflont No i 14. RECREATION. Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () (~) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facddies such that substantial physical detenoration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () ('~) require the wnstruction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments• a) The addition of 185 residents within the area would require an additional 0 92 acres of parkland for the City to maintain its policy of five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents The applicant will be mandated to pay development impact fees as an alternative funding source for adding park acreage or making park improvements. The proposed site plan includes three letter lots to remain as open space in the form of a grass-lined water detention basin to be maintained by a homeowners association. Impacts to existing recreation facilities would be less than significant. b) The protect does not include recreational facilities or directly regwre the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 28 Issues and Supporting Information Sources vaenuauy Sipafltanl Sip.ncaa NA5lpatlal m.~ SlpNflaw No i a Asa ~ a i 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial () () (/) ( ) in relation to the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle thps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a () () (/) ( ) level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety nsks~ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)9 e) Result in inadequate emergency accessl () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? O O U (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments• a,b) The proposed project includes the development of 58 single-family homes. Based on the number of lots and residential land use, Urbemis 2002 was run to compute the number of daily taps Based on 10 8 trips per and per day, the proposed project was protected to generate a total of 628 average daily trips The proposed project proponent would be regwred to construct the necessary street improvements as contained in the conddions of approval for the project, and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the project. c) The project site is located approximately three miles northwest of Ontario Airport, north of the flight path The development would not be dangerous to the site occupants or Ontario International Airport aircraft. d,f) Access to the site would be from Base Line Road, a major divided arterial street that includes a raised median island with no access openings; hence, egress from project site is limited to right-turn movements only The lines of sight for vehiGes traveling either east on Base Line Road are clear and provide unabated views to oncoming cars or pedestrians. No sharp curves or dangerous intersections would be associated with the protect. The internal streets would ~(~il~ DD Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 Page 29 provide adequate space for emergency access. No impacts associated with safety hazards or inadequate emergency access or parking is antiapated with the proposed protect. g) The protect site is located on the north side of Base Line Road between Etiwanda Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway According to Exhibit III-7 "General Bikeway Plan," the site is located adjacent to a Class II bikeway on Base Line Road. Class II bikeways are located near the shoulder of roads and share the pavement with vehicles. They are special lanes set apart with proper signage The proposed project is not antiapated to cause hazards to bicyclists or pedestrians in the vicinity or conflict with policies supporting alternate transportation The project design also includes access to the planned PaGfic Electric Inland Empire regional trail (Class I Bike Path) within the abandoned railroad corridor along north tract boundary. Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~nmm Leaf 71wn N µn, ~ Lax s~w~ na i a i Leo i i a 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? cj Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing faalities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ~ ~ () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes () () () (/) and regulations related to solid waste? ~'i i3,N' ~ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 30 Comments: a) The proposed project will include the construction of 58 single-family houses on 19 acres. The development would be served by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct sewer system, which has wastewater treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect is requred to meet the requisites of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are projected. b) The proposed protect would be served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water and sewer systems. Wastewater is treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the PR-4 treatment plant located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and PR-1 treatment plant located within the City of Ontano, neither of which are operating at capacity Development of 58 single-family homes would not require the construction of new water distnbution, sewer collection, or wastewater treatment facilities. c) The proposed site will include the construction of an underground storm drain system designed to handle a 100-year flood event. Site storm drams would empty into existing storm drains in Base Line Road The proposed project also includes the construction of an 80,000 cubic-feet water detention basin created to mitigate flows. d) The proposed development would be served by the Cucamonga Va„ey Water District. There is currently sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated f,g) The current city contracted hauler would provide solid waste disposal needs for the proposed development. Waste would be disposed of at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle solid waste regwrements The protect would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939, which required a 50 percent reduction in the amount of waste deposited in landfills by the year 2000 There are no impacts to solid waste management projected. Issues and Supporting Information Sources vaanuaur ~~""°"' ~aaa m.n s~yaecwu '" "U0Q8~ u» man s',o""" n""' , "° 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade () (/) () ( ) the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speGes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resVict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor penods of California history or prehistory? ~; ~,/~ 90 Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pace 31 Issues and Supporting Informatwn Sources aam,u"uy s'?""n"' Lea+mm s~aa~~i ,~""YhpB„"q, 4u m"" ~'°"°O"' "° b) Does the protect have impacts that are () () (~) ( ) individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Does the protect have environmental effects () () () (~) which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The protect site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Currently, the site is utilized as a tree/plant nursery Adtacent lots to the east, northeast, south, and west are developed or proposed for development Based on the surrounding residential development, nearby I-15 Freeway and the adjacent Base Line Road, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species inhabit the site. Furthermore, concerning the issues with the eucalyptus tree windrows, mitigation measures 12, 13, and 14 would reduce the impacts to less than significant with mitigation incorporated Concern for prehistoric and historical features can be mitigated to a less than significant impact with the incorporation of mitigation measures 15, 16, and 17 b) The proposed development of 58 single-family houses would add approximately 185 residents to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and cause short-term impacts to air quality and noise. Other residential developments occur immediately south of Base Line Road, to the east and northeast, as well as to the west. All service providers have confirmed their ability to serve the proposed development This represents a population increase of 0 12 percent m the City, which does not exceed population build-0ut estimates asserted m the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The General Plan was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library service, aesthetics, and casual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, yet, they would not reduce impacts to less than significent levels. As a result, the City adopted Statements of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts ((CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these Findings and Statements of Ovemding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred ~,~,~ 9/ Initial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 c) The proposed development would not cause substantial adverse effects on • humans, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identified construction- related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would diminish once construction activities are completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in Section 11 of this Initial Study would ensure impacts are reduced to less than significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply). (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Acoustical Analysis Tract 16776 City of Rancho Cucamonga, prepared by Gordon Bracken and Associates, March 29,2004 (/) Arborist Report for the Fritz Property San Bernardino County, California , prepared by Sims Tree Health Speaalists, March 31, 2004. (/) Water Quality Management Plan for Van Daele Development, Inc., prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004. (/) Drainage Report, prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 22, 2004 (/) Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment and Limited Site Characterization, prepared by LOR Geotechnicel Group, Inc., December 22, 2003 (/) Preliminary Soils Investigation, prepared by John R. Byerly Incorporated, January 5, 2004. (/) Cultural Records Search and Survey, prepared by Michael Brandman Associates, March 29, 2004; as revised July 29, 2004. (/) Etiwanda Specific Plan, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1983, with amendments through September 6, 2000. ~~~,~ 9a Irntial Study for SUBTT16776 & DRC2004-00052 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 33 . APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described m this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have rewsed the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature. C' ~ ~ Date: lZ't`Ele~-E Print Name and Title• Theh S , Kihq F xe~v~-l--i~/e V i~ ~~S . City of Rancho Cucamonga . NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental QualrtyAct Section 21091 and 21092 o/the Public Resources Code. Project Fde No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 Public Review Period Closes: March 23, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Van Daele Development Corporation Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, and 55 thru 58 Project Descnption: A request to subdivide 19 gross acres of land into 59 lots and the development of 59 single-family homes within the Low-Medium Residenbal Distract (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Related FOe Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ® The Indial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ~ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substanbal evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negatwe Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • March 23. 2005 Date of Determination Adopted B/~y ~ ~~ ~/ /7/ • RESOLUTION NO.05-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776, A 59 LOT SUBDIVISION OF 19 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A Rentals 1. Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 26, 2005, and continued to February 9, March 9, and March 23, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on January 26, February 9, March 9, and March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at Base Line Road, 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,350 feet, and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office, and b The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and forrner Panfic Electnc Railroad nght-of-way, the property to the south consists of single-family residential, the property to the east is single-family residential and a freeway off ramp, and the property to the west is single-family residential and vacant, and c The development is proposed to include the development of one single-family residence on each lot except for the temporary installation of a detention basin for drainage control on four of the lots, and d All parking and nrculation requji~rements aregmet / ~ / ~~ ~ !~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 . Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans; and The site is physia311y swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e. The tentahve tract is not likely to muse serious public health problems; and f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement aaawred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4. Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows• a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance Hnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mfonnation provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public hearing, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~ ~~ ~-~ ~, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) The northerly penmeter of the temporary detention basin shall be improved in a manner simdady proposed for the front yards of the residences. The basin shall be also improved with a wrought iron fence and landscaping. 2) The sound wall shall be included in the improvement of the temporary detention basin lots. 3) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to prowde a trail access at the end of the most northeastedy cul-de-sac (also known as Street "C" and Acom Place), if feasible, to overcome grade differential with future regional trail to the north 4) The sound walls delineated in the acoustical analysis must be provided on all lots to be improved including those lots that will contain the temporary detention basin Provide details in the plan and the elevation of the vanous sound walls 5) The protect boundary penmeterwalls shall be constructed in a manner to match the penmeterwalls on the south side of Base Line Road with nver rock plasters and slumpstone cap 6) The developer shall prowde wntten notification, in a format approved by the City Planner, to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound I-15 Freeway off ramp, and create a new "cloverleaf' on ramp, closer to the tract boundary 7) No permit or further approval for this protect shall be forthcoming hereafter untl the bulling now situated over the westerly project boundary (across the property line) in the wamty of Lot 1 of the proposed protect is removed in accordance with the California Bulling Code and to the satisfaction of the Budding Offiaal. Engineenng Department 1) Base Line Road frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Mator Divided Artenal" standard including, but not limited to, the following a) Right-of-way shall be 60 feet measured from the street centerline along the entire protect frontage b) Provide curb, gutter, 5-foot wide curvilinear sidewalk, and asphalt pavement as required ,^ ~/ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 4 c) Provide landscaped median on Base Line Road along the entire project frontage with no openings The existing median m Base Line Road is to be protected and reconstructed as needed. d) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Base Line Road' frontage e) Provide a Class II Bike Lane along the protect frontage. f) Prowde traffic signage, stnpmg, and R26 "No Stopping" signs, or replace, as regwred g) Prowde a westbound right-turn/deceleration lane for traffic entering the subdivision 2) Internal streets to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential" standards, including but not limited to the following a) Prowde curb and gutter and property Ime-adtacent sidewalk as regwred b) Prowde 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Prowde traffic stnpmg and signage, as regwred 3) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Interim Master Basin No. 5B as follows, /ustified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer. a) Prowde an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed tributary area south of the future regional trail and east of Etiwanda Avenue. b) Install sufficient capacity to mitigate the increased runoff from this development, with an outlet system capable of handling the ultimate basin design (entire tributary area) with a minimum amount of modification as incremental development occurs. c) An assessment district shall be formed for maintenance of the detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the facility, but prowdmg the City with the right of access to maintain the facility if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer. Said agreement shall include a cash deposit as security forany maintenance costs the City may incur Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property d) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related faalities (outlet, etc) from~uture~ ve opment using the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 5 basin If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Install local storm drains to convey development drainage to the Intenm Master Basin No 5B on-site Extend the local storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain QZe within tops of curbs and Q,oo within nghts-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q,o The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit Design local storm drains for ultimate connection to the existing MPSD in Base Line Road a) Final drainage study shall address whether the lateral in Lot 31, taking undeveloped runoff from the north side of the future regional trail, is still needed or if it can be replaced with a facility taking trail runoff only to Street "E:' This will also affect Intenm basin sizing and whether any of the off-site flows should be directed to existing Basin 5A b) Where storm drains are available, provide catch basins in lieu of cross gutters c) Both catch basins and laterals at west end of Street "D" shall intercept O,oo Final drainage study shall address both the Intenm (proposed) and ultimate (Street "D" extended to west) development conditions. 5) Lots containing the interim basin shall be encumbered by a temporary public drainage easement 6) Connection to future Pacific Electnc Inland Empire Trail through the Street "E" cul-de-sac shall be a sidewalk easement equally split between Lots 31 and 32 (property line in middle of sidewalk) 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, except for the 66 kV electncal) on the protect side of Base Line Road shall be undergrounded along the entire protect frontage, extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whicheveroccurs first All services crossing Base Line Road shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate. ~~~~ ~ q9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 6 8) If the existing overhead utilities along the west prolect boundary serve any of the Not-A-Part parcels to the west, then perform under- grounding and provide a public utility easement along the prolect boundary If not, then remove the overhead utilities. 9) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 10) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan 11) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the prolect CC&Rs Environmental Mitigation Air Qualrry 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,p) emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developershall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equpment will be utilized, or that there use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the prolect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as Cdy Planning staff 6) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' speafications ~~ i~, /-~ ~~ 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 7 Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed perfonmance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAOMD Rule 1108. 9) All construction egwpment shall complywith SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on site when appropnate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Mamtam a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 10) Construction contractors shall utilize electnc or clean altematroe fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 11) Construction contractors shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use d~; ~, ~ /off PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 8 Biological Resources 1) New Eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to replace existing Red Gum Eucalyptus trees in the manner specified in the New Windrow Planting Gwdelines within the Etiwanda Specific Plan 2) The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation Said tree shall also receive proper treatment for wound at the base of the tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exerased by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19 08 110 including, but not limited to, ' enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence prior to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permit, grading, or budding permit Protective fenang shall remain in place dunng all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl. • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within newdevelopments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) Upon human remains encountered dunng excavation associated with this protect, all work will halt and the County Coroner will be notified PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 • Page 9 (Section 5097 98 of the Public Resource Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remams are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted This Commission wdl contact the most likely descendant who wdl, within 24 hours, then make recommendations This may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remams and items assoaated with Native American burials 3) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the prolect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wdl also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Bwlding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern • California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 . Page 10 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits . Noise 1) An acoustical sound wall wdl be regwred at a height of 6 feet for Lots 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet far Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL The walls shall be constructed of approved matenals and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis. Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall regwre approval of a vanance application 2) Once bwlding plans are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the bwlding mitigation regwred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL intenor noise standard. 3) The developer shall provide wntten notification to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at • the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be required by the Planning Department Said consultant will report their findings to the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-15 SUBTT16776 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 11 Planning Department within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant would immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with aty noise standards or halted CJ The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary C~ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT16776 and DRC2004-00052 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unantiapated arcumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the project planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the Cdy These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identifythe reporteras an indiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. C~ ~~ {-~ /D l MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Maa SUBTT16T76 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 Applicant: Dan Vaele Development Cora Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy Date: January 26. 2005 G a .. ~ .. . c`•'.'u`r~'~~a`~`:~,' .AiFQuality;~~`.~;<.~~..~.' '.. ~ , J " ,41~ ,1~ .~ .. . I .. •. r .. ^c Th t ~ ~ aw ~S.S"t3Gd ./a ~``~' r c+:~~+: 3* ~"., sYw.. kJ. ~~ pm ~ t4..r. .pi ~•'i~~aeli ~~~ e si e shall be treated with water or other sod- BO C stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Av Quality During q 4 Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water construction Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM ,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule BO C During q 4 established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions, m construction accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Grading opera4ons shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Durng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive consWction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipmentwdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to anyconstruction measures imposed bythe SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff • , ~'! i ~ ! ~ .. .. .. .. .. All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification All paints and coati h l ngs s a l meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertorinance standards BO B noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 Review of plans A/C 2 All construction equpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall Review of plans A/C 2/4 include the following provisions on grading plans and initiate on site or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established 80 C During A 4 by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 2of8 \T c .. - • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e BO C - - ~.. , , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Dunng q 4 SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch fr b ee oard ratio on sods BO C D haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other uring q 4 suitable means Construction Construction contractors shall utiliz l e e ectric or clean BO C R alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible eview of plans AIC q Construction contractors shall ens th ure at construction- BO C R grading plans include a statement that work crews will eview of plans AIC 2/4 shut off equipment when not in use Biological Resources . - -, ..~ _ - , New eucalyptus tree windrows h l s ou d be planted to CP B/C D replace existing red gum eucalyptus trees in the manner unng q 3 speafied in the New Windrow Planting Guidelines within construction the Etiwanda Speafic Plan The Blue Atlas Ced h ll ar s a be preserved through relocation supervised by a licensed arbonst Said tree CP B/C Dunng q g shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of construction tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain link fence prior to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permit, grading permit, or building permit Protective fencing shall remain in place during all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the written consent of - the City Planner until construction is complete 3~ \T ~~0. L~ .. .. ~ -. -. . ~. . . Cultural Resources - - - - ~ -; - ~- --- ,- - If any prehistoric ar h l c aeo ogical resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl ' retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures t t CPBO o pro ect undesignated sites f d C Review of report A/D 3/4 rom emolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Cary to establish its archaeological value • Consider establi h CP/B s ing provisions to require O C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point ~ Pursue educating the public about the area's CPIBO C Review of report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrabons, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 4of8 \~' Z w .. , ~ .. . Upon human remains encountered dunng CP -. C . During A ., . . 3/4 excavation associated with this protect, all work will construction ' halt and the County Coroner will be notified ' (Section 5097 98 of the Public Resource Code) The Coroner will determine whether the remain s are of forensic interest If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted This commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations This may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials A qualified paleontolo ist h ll CP g s a conduct a preconstruction l3 R AID 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall eview of report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate , the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP 13 Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actroi4es • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BD ti/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately droert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum 5 _~ ' . ~ .. .. ~• j,l.lycirology andFWate~tQuality," ~`z`• .'~'~=""~` ;s-ri t•Y~~ t ~n . • r$A ~,~' ~ ~ ~ ~ - a-F, . , - Pnor to issuance of radin r w'art`s' Nrd,Y~?.i~ BO ~nK .~ X~5 ,t ~ 3.S L' ` ~~='~ ~.a'f .. `4 ~YCx, ° k'v:=. ' ~ ~'~ ~~. , ~.,. _, p applicant shall subm t to Bu Idmg Offiaal for B Plan Check C 2 approval, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical An erosion control plan shall be r p epared, included BO B Pl in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed an Check C p project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minim ize sod exposure to rainy penods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame During constru t t ion, c emporary berms such as BO B/C During A 4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent construction discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C During q q cleaning wdl be pertormed pnor to storm events construction and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 6of8 ~_ ^.~ .. , .. . ~. .. , The developer shall implement the BMPs identified BO B/C in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dunng t t A q Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce cons ruc ion pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall l d inc u e provisions for BO B/C Dunng A controlling and minimizing the use of construction 4 fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits HI ~ ~ '~ ' An acoustical sound wall wdl be requved at a height of 6 CP B/ ~ r ~ ~,,. .~ •n, r ,c~ ,. y ~ : - _ _ feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54 C Plan Check C 2 , and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as specified m the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall requve approval of a variance application Once bwlding plans are available, an Acoustical CP B Plan Check C 2 Analysis shall be prepared to determine the budding mitigation requved to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard The developer shall provide written notification to all CP C,D Certification of D 3 home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road Occupancy interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays 70, Key to Checklist Abbreviations l\ l _ .. , Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO .. ., . . standards specified in Development Code Section C During q 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line construction Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Buildrng Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building O~cial If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above n oise standards or halted Responsible~Person s , • ~ t •. _; CDD - Commurnty Development Director or designee Monitoring~Frequency, ,~ ~,; = A -With E h N ;IVl,ethod'of,Verlfication~'~~`~.„~is~s''•°' m. ~ z.x: x•., 7~ > ~~~ < ~~ -"~°' - Sanctions+. ~s":•r"i:Y~r=,~: ~:~; • -:~ r;#• ,. ~s . t CP - Cily Planner or designee ac ew Development B - Prior T C A - On-sde Ins action p 1 -Withhold Rewrdation of Final Map CE -City Engineer or designee 80 -Building Official or designee PO -Police Captain or designee FC -Fire Chief or designee o onstruction C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion E -Operating B -Other Agency Permit /Approval C -Plan Check D -Separate Submittal (ReportslStudies/ Plans) 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit 3 -Withhold Cemficate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citabon 8of8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776 SUBJECT: 59 LOT SUBDIVISION OF 19 ACRES OF LAND APPLICANT: VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASELINE ROAD, 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements coin IeGOn 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 is granted subtect to the approval of _/_/_ Variance DRC2004-01002 B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which inGude _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Specific Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actmty being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/~ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-11-04 ,~gf} 1/~ Protect No SUBTT16776 Comolehon Date 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonrywalls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 8 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground coverfor erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than S feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be inGuded in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-/. / / / / / / SC-1 A4 Protect No SUBI'T16776 Comolehon Date E. F G. 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/= perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer ~ 7 Ail walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 8 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prinaples of _/ /_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code 9 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Macutata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear _/_/_ feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the Citys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyerwrittennotice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways /_/_ in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of _/ /_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 4 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/ /_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ / of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/ / perform such work ~ SC-1-04 Protect No SUBTT16776 ComoleGOn Date 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwiding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage faalities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 60 total feet on Base Line Road 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Counal Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is regwred unless, rn addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Counal, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance: of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development ~_~ SC-1-04 / / -/-/- -/-/- ! / -~ /- / / / / -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- ,~~l~,l-f l L 1 Protect No SUBTT16776 Comolehon Date 4 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Troll Other Base line Road X X (c) X X X X Internal Streets X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item See the protect special conditions of approval Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pnvate street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program -~ /~ / / / / / / -~ /~ / / / / / / / / / / SC-1-04 Protect No SUBTT16776 Comoleaon Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name fiotanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size ~ See Street Tree Requirement form -attached Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required J. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Base Line Road, from the west tract boundary to the east tract boundary 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas ( %)ofmortaredcobble or other acceptable non-irigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer This pro/ect shall be annexed into LMD No 9 and SLD Nos 1 and 8 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road K. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas SC-7-04 f~/ ~s~ ~°~'~ -/-~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/_~ Project No SUBTT16776 ComoleGOn Date 3 Trees are prohibded within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk L. Utilities t Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/ /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pnor to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/ /_ Approval of the final map will be sub/ect to any requirements that may be received from them M. General Requirements and Approvals 1 EtiwandalSan Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage / /_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within then right of-way Sanbag _/~ for connection(s) to regional trail 3 Anon-refundable deposd shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bwldmg permit issuance if no map is involved 4 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Fonn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwldmg permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department wdhtn 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED sC-~-0a 7 ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS September 20, 2004 Van Daele Development Corporation N/O Baseline FJO Etiwanda SFR Tract DRC2004-00052 & SUBTTi6776 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gwdelines for Rre Hydrants• The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fve hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any budding. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the sde. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located wthin 600-feet of the proposed project site. • FSG9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire Distract vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. ~~8,~- la3 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has approved your request for an • alternate method #05844 (PMT2004-06120). The Homes and garages on lots 22-47 must be equipped with automatic fire Sprinklers in accordance to NFPA 13D. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utddies over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers°. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. AFS: Obtain a final for the Fire Sprinkler Systems In lots 22-47. 3. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 4. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be wsible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • ~,~,~ ~a~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION • TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST UPDATED 6/3/03 DATE: 2-9-04 T0: RENE GUERRERO, ASSISTANT ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: DAWN ROURK, LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT PROJECT: DRC2004-00052, SUBTT16776 LOCATION: N/S BASELINE AVE, E/0 ETIWANDA DESIGN NOTES: 1. STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREETTREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-0F-0URB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISH)N, LANDSCAPE SECTION AT 909-477-2740 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMEN7 PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME. 3. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED 70 SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTHSOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREETTREE LIST. WIND-PRONE AREAS MAYBE REQUIRED 70 UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE. 5. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ONSITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. ONSTTE AND OFFSITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS A80LR PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE ATTHE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT 7HE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND. 7. STREET HNPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECTA LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE: STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER 7HE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEE7Z (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) EIO HAVEN AVE FOREGROUND TREE Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 30' O.C , 15 GAL PA60RGREATER 'SamuelSOmmer TRIANGULATED PA LESS THAN s OR Magnolia granddlora'St NCN 3' 20' 0 C 15 GAL UNDER POWER LWES Mary TRIANGULATED BACKGRWNDTREE Pmus cananensls Canary Island Pine 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL PA 6 OR GREATER MIN INFORMAL, USE OCCASIONALLY BEHIND MAGNOLIAS 'CCENi TREE ~gmdambar styraaflua NCN 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL 'Festival' • ROVIDE STREET SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE LIST FOR RANCHO NAME CUCAMONGA LIST EACH STREET AS A SEPARATE L INE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND - l ~~ ~ ~"~ - RESOLUTION NO 05-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00052, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 59SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 19 ACRES OF LAND (TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16776), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND THE RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2004-00701 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A Recitals 1 Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for the Design Review of Tract SUBTT16776, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On January 26, 2005, and continued to February 9, March 9, and March 23, 2005, the - Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to considerthe application 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meetings on January 26, February 9, March 9, and March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speaficelly finds as follows a The application applies to property located at Base Lme Road, 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,350 feet, and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office, and b The property to the north of the subiect site is vacant and former Paafic Electnc Railroad nght-of-way, the property to the south consists ofsingle-family residential, the property to the east is single-family residential and freeway off ramp, and the property to the west is single-family residential and vacant, and c The development is proposed to include the development of one single-family residence on each lot, except for the temporary installation of a detention basin for drainage control on four of the lots, and d All parking and arculation regwrements are met PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a. That the proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is m accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements m the vanity. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative . Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the infonnation contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wdl have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 3 Planning Department 1) In order to better preserve the Eucalyptus windrow on the adfacent property to the west, the westerly project boundary shall be provided with a Penang matenal such as woodcrete, which is durable and uses a spaced posthole footing rather than a continuous footing The recommendations found in the Sims Tree Health Speaalists letter of March 2, 2005, shall be followed in all respects 2) The northerly penmeter of the temporary detention basin shall be improved in a manner similarly proposed for the front yards of the residences The basin shall be also improved with a wrought iron fence and landscaping 3) The sound wall shall be included in the improvement of the temporary detention basin lots 4) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to prowde a trail access at the end of the most northeasterly cul-de-sac (also known as Street "C" and Acom Place), if feasible, to overcome grade differential with future regional trail to the north 5) The sound walls delineated in the acoustical analysis must be provided on all lots to be improved including those lots that will contain the temporary detention basin Provide details in the plan and the elevation of the vanous sound walls 6) The protect boundary penmeter walls shall be constructed in a manner to match the penmeter walls on the south side of Base Line Road with nver rock plasters and slumpstone cap. 7) The developer shall prowde wntten notification, in a format approved by the City Planner, to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Lme Road interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound I-15 Freeway off ramp, and create a new "cloverleaf" on ramp, closer to the tract boundary. 8) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00701 is herebyapproved, exceptthat the Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved in place If relocation becomes necessary, it shall be subject to the environmental mitigations for replacement planting as contained in this Resolution 9) No perrrnt or further approval for this protect shall be forthcoming hereafter until the bulling now situated over the westerly protect boundary (across the property line) in the vianity of Lot of the proposed protect 1 is removed in accordance with the California Bulling Code and to the satisfaction of the Building Offiaal ~-,r~,N lad PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 4 Enaineennp Department 1) Base Line Road frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Mayor Divided Artenal"standards including, but not limited to, the following. a) Right-0f-way shall be 60 feet measured from the street centerline along the entire protect frontage b) Provide curb, gutter, 5-foot wide curvilinear sidewalk, and asphalt pavement as regwred c) Provide landscaped median on Base Line Road along the entire project frontage with no openings. The existing median in Base Line Road is to be protected and reconstructed as needed. d) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Base Line Road frontage e) Prowde a Class II Bike Lane along the protect frontage f) Provide traffic signage, stnpmg, and R26 "No Stopping" signs or replace as required g) Provide a westbound nght-tum/deceleration lane for traffic entenng the subdivision 2) Internal streets are to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential" standards, including but not limited to the following a) Provide curb and gutter and property line-adtacent sidewalk as regwred b) Prowde 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required c) Provide traffic stnpmg and signage, as regwred 3) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Intenm Master Basin No 5B as follows, tustified by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer. a) Provide an ultimate design for the basin to serve the entire developed tnbutary area south of the future regional Vail and east of Etiwanda Avenue. b) Install suffiaent capaaty to mitigate the increased runofffrom this development, with an outlet system capable of handling the ultimate basin design (entire tnbutary area) with a minimum amount of modification as incremental development occurs ~,D~h~ ~aq PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 5 c) An assessment district shall be formed for maintenance of the detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the facility, but providing the City with the right of access to maintain the facility, if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those costs to the developer Said agreement shall include a cash deposit as security for any maintenance costs the City may incur. Said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property. d) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related faafities (outlet, etc) from future development using the basin If the developer fails to submd said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate 4) Install local storm drains to convey development drainage to the Intenm Master Basin No 5B on-site Extend the local storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain Qze within tops of curbs and O,oo within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in O,o The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit Design local storm drains for ultimate connection to the existing MPSD in Base Line Road a) Final drainage study shall address whether the lateral in Lot 31, taking undeveloped runoff from the north side of the future regional trail, is still needed or if it can be replaced with a faality taking trail runoff only to Street "E " This will also affect Intenm basin sizing and whether any of the off-site flows, should be directed to existing Basin 5A b) Where storm drains are available, provide catch basins in lieu of cross gutters c) Both catch basins and laterals at west end of Street "D" shall intercept Q,~ Final drainage study shall address both the intenm (proposed) and ultimate (Street "D" extended to west) development conditions 5) Lots containing the intenm basin shall be encumbered by a temporary public drainage easement 6) Connection to future Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail through the Street "E" cul-de-sac shall be a sidewalk easement equally split between Lots 31 and 32 (property line in middle of sidewalk) 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the protect side of Base Line Road f~-I~i}~ ~'J~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 6 shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Base Line Road shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate S) If the existing overhead utilities along the west protect boundary serve any of the Not-A-Part parcels to the west, then perform undergrounding and provide a public utility easement along the protect boundary If not, then remove the overhead utilities 9) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages 10) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 11) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the protect CC&Rs Environmental Mitigation Av Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Base Line Road shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ~2-~t~,/~ 631 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 7 5) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that there use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning staff 6) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficabon 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on site when appropnate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 8 Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other sudable means. 10) Construction contractors shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 11) Construction contractors shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use Biological Resources 1) New Eucalyptus tree windrows should be planted to replace existing Red Gum Eucalyptus trees m the manner speafied in the New Windrow Planting Gwdelines within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 2) The Blue Atlas Cedar shall be preserved through relocation. Said tree shall also receive proper treatment for wound at the base of the tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exercised by all mdrwduals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree m accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19 08 110 including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protective chain Imk fence prior to the issuance of any cleanng and grubbing permit, grading, or budding permit Protective fencing shall remain m place dunng all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the wntten consent of the Cdy Planner until construction is complete. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, ,~-,~3,{~ l33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 9 important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) Upon human remains encountered dunng excavation associated with this protect, all work will halt and the County Coroner will be notified (Section 5097 98 of the Public Resource Code) The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistonc, the Native Amencan Hentage Commission well be contacted This Commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations This may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remams and items assoaated with Native American bunals 3) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey • of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth~Jisturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices . (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical /3-il3~l~ lay PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 • Page 10 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actiwties are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods expenenced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified dine frame 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns orsedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the sde 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water . Quality Management Plan (prepared by Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the stone dram system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits Noise 1) An acoustical sound wall will be regwred at a height of 6 feet for Lots 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54, and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce extenor noise levels at or below 65 CNEL The walls shall be constructed of approved matenals and as speafied m the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall regwre approval of a vanance application 2) Once building plans are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to detennine the building mitigation regwred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL mtenor noise standard . 3) The developer shall provide wntten notification to all home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Lme Road interchange is planned to be PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-16 DRC2004-00052 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 11 reconstructed in a manner that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national holidays 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120. Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Planning Department Said consultant will report their findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant would immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with city noise standards or halted 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mdigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP wdl be m place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monrtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significent impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authonty for processing the protect Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mdigation Monitoring Program SUBTT16776 and DRC2004-00052 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation actvities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reportmg Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reportmg Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form 6 Unantiapated arcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~_~ /~j~//N" ~c~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project F[le No.: Tentative Tract Maa SUBTT16776 and Development Review DRC2004-00052 Applicant: Dan Vaele Development Coro Initial Study Prepared by: Vance Pomeroy Date: January 26.2005 .. .. The site shall b t e reated with water or other soil- stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast A Q l BO C During q 4 v ua i Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water construction Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM ~o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Base Line Road shall be sw t ep according to a schedule BO C D established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions in urng q 4 , accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 construction Grading operations sh ll b a e suspended when wind BO C During q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction 4 from the site dunng such episodes \ Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Durin A RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction g q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,a emissions Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 shall submd construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the SCAQMD as well as City Planning Staff 1 .. All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP ., , operating condition so as to reduce operational C Review of plans A/C 2/4 emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficatwn All paints and coatings shall m t ee or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rute 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed rt pe ormance standards BO g R noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 eview of plans A/C 2 Ali construction equipment shall c l omp y with SCAQMD BO C Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall Review of plans A/C 2/q include the following provisions on grading plans and initiate on site or as soon as feasible • Reestablish round g cover on the construction site BO C R through seeding and watering eview of plans AIC y4 • Pave or a l rav l t pp y g e o any on-site haul roads BO C R f eview o plans AIC 2/4 • Phase gradin to r t th g p even e susceptibility of large BO C R f l areas to erosion over extended periods of time eview o p ans A1C 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During q 4 by the City rf silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 2 of 8 ~ ~ . • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e BO .. , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with C Dunng q 4 SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeb d oar ratio on sods BO C D haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other unng q 4 suitable means Construction Construction contractors shall utilize l tr e ec ic or clean BO C alternatroe fuel powered egwpment where feasible Review of plans AIC 4 Construction contractors shall ens th ure at construction- BO C grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl Review of plans AIC 2/4 shut off egwpment when not in use Biological Resources ~- • ;_ _ ~~'- ~s~ T. y '~3«,ny Gw ~'f L^k..r~ -;. .~> ` u~~, ~.i v 4 .. iYS+n .i aff -~f r. Y>}y"i• y~?~f.~Ptry ~i"",.z~ .`.='. iMF~KV"u`~ ` ~Y-~ T ;;55yy.""~~'~~ )W)yy+^~Cyyfi+'«~t T~.y' 3RtSS~ t y f ~ 36'Y*}`}1~ Y ~yyh+,.~~~?~,~J ' *' < ~ ~ t ~ .f-'rv~ y±.~+r ~ t.~^.._„Y'4. `~ ~ ~~ New eucalyptus tree windrows should b l ^ M1 6w + i ~ SS.u'~F'aS ~ ~ ~ lx xy~~ + ~KttZ Im 's4 yKf ~i ~?~Rwa*~ 5i E e p anted to replace existing red gum eucalyptus trees in the manner CP B/C Dunn g A 3 speafied in the New W indrow Planting Gwdelines within construction the Etiwanda Specific Plan The Blue Atlas Cedar shall b e preserved through l CP B/C Dunng q re ocation supervised by a licensed arbonst Said tree g shall also receive proper treatment for wound at base of construction tree to protect against decay and disease Care shall be exercised by all individuals, developers, and contractors working near the tree to preserve and protect the tree in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 19 08 110, including, but not limited to, enclosing the tree with a protectroe chain link fence prior to the issuance of any clearing and grubbing permit, grading permit, or building permit Protective fenang shall remain in place dunng all phases of construction and shall not be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete 3 ~C~` i ~ ~ ., Cu tu al Resources .. - ~ _ . _ If any prehistoric archaeolo i l g ca resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Enact interim measures to rote t d CP/BO p c un esignated sites from demolitio C Review of report A/~ 3/4 n or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishin rov CP/BO g p isions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within n C Review of report a0 3/4 ew developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the ubl b ' CP/BO p ic a out the area s archaeological heritage C Review of report AIO 3/4 • Propose miti ation CP/BO g measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate advers C Review of report A/0 3/4 e protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report AIO 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report Huth , anginal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 4 of 8 .. ' ~ pon human remains encountered dunng . CP ., C urin . . _ A ..- .. 3/4 excavation associated with this protect all work will g , halt and the County Coroner will be notified construction (Section 5097 98 of the Public Resource Code) The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest If the Coroner, with the aid of the supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be contacted This commission will contact the most likely descendant who will, within 24 hours, then make recommendations This may include the saentific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Natve American burials Aqualifiedpaleontologistshallconduct CP apreconstruction 8 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Review of report A/D 4 submd a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate , the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontolo ical CP g monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with B Review of report '0/D 4 minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be fo d th BD un wi in an area being cleared B/C R f p/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actrodies eview o report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum r L 5 ~ . ~~ . . . .. ~ ~- _ _ Hydrology,~and Water Quality ~ zr =`'' - ~';`""-~~ ~"~. ~` - ~ ...~:~.Z; ;:£ : ~~'~~ ' ~= ~ .. e.,~r y~~.e°'`°'~w, ' ~l ,r...r.t~g^C•.'4`~':M(d5"u'". 1 1 - 'Y+;r~L7'II~~'."'~, `t , .. :Y1~pg~.1 `Y.r,+w i~ ~ ` ~ _ y~:"q ~^ .-.~'.rc: 7i . _ Pnor to issuance of rad a w a, ..GS _a i1t ~i o- Aai~'e "M1>~ t~`t.'~Y_4N e 1 _ ~i} ~~,,e df '~ /.~' ~ Ma ~ Y IJ}IL 4. •- . a ~ ~ N ev ^t ti' fy 'tom g ing permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for BO B Plan Check C y approval, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical An erosion control lan sh ll b p a e prepared, included BO B in grading plan, and implemented forthe proposed Plan Check C 2 protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are indicted through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods expenenced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C During A q sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent construction discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C During A 4 cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events construction and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 6of8 .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified BO • in the Water Quality Management Plan re ared b P P B/C During A 4 Y Thielmann Engineers, June 21, 2004, to reduce construction pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and m BO g/C During q inimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbiades Landscaped areas construction 4 shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including momtonn g provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits .~. i'• q ~ ' {!-`_~ HY r1~ !'~~ SAY n~L,a "%.. ~]».'~ ~ An acoustical sound wall will be r d _ s equire at a height of 6 CP B/C Pl feet for Lots 47,48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, 7 feet for Lot 54 an Check C 2 , and 8 feet for Lots 1 and 53, in order to reduce exterior noise levels to 65 CNEL or below The walls shall be constructed of approved materials and as specified in the Acoustical Analysis Wall heights greater than 8 feet shall regwre approval of a variance application Once bwldin lans g p are available, an Acoustical Analysis shall be prepared to determine the bwidin CP B Pian Check C 2 g mitigation requred to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard The developer shall provide written notification to all CP C D Certification of D home buyers that the I-15 Freeway/Base Line Road , 3 interchange is planned to be reconstructed in a manner Occupancy that would shift the southbound off ramp closer to the tract boundary Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or national construction holidays ~ ~s • i Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall here a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Sald consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible:Person `"` - ~ 'Monitoring CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To G CE -City Engineer or designee C - Throughoi BO - Building Official or designee D - On Comply PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operabng FC -Fire Chief ar desianen C Dunng I q construction 4 A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Greding or Buil C -Plan Check 3 - W dhhold Certificate of O D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 8of8 Permd COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEf~A STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00052 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 59 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD. 1.200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Com lehon 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Design Review DRC2004-00052 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Tract _/_/ Map SUBTT16776 and Variance DRC2004-01002 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No OS-16, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties invclved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Varance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire If _/_/_ bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed B. C~ SC-11-04 Pro~ecl No DRC2004-00052 C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which inGude site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actmty being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the faaltties shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permtts (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonrywalls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 10 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscapmg shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fenang 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtointng property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter i S~_,-04 f~;f3,f~ l~~ Comolehon Date -/-/- -/-/ _/_/ I / I I / / -/-/- -/-/- / / _/_/. -/-/- / / / / Protect No DRC2004-00052 Comolehon Date D. E. F 14 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/= wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency ~ 15 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 16 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ 17 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _/_/_ support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two %inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 18 Wood fencng shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant _/ /_ 19 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and vrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 20 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/~ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard lwo-car width at street _/_/_ Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy C~ SC-1-04 ~~/ ~ ~T / Protect No DRC2004-00052 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-faintly residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This requirement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 7 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 9 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code 10 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spaang, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the Cttys Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and I-15 Freeways in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any properly A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with Cary standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes SC-1-04 4 ~;~3,1~1so Comolehon Date I / / / / / / / / / ! / / / -~-~- I / / / / Prgect No DRC2004-00052 Comoledon Date 4 Mitigation measures are requred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _I_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to ~ post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ctty Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for foAeit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ /_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00052) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and 'lvet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Bwiding and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/~ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-00052) The applicant shall comply with the SC-1-04 5 1~;131/~ lS/ Protect No DRC2004-00052 Comoletion Dale latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for . availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to tssuance of building permits for a new residential protect or motor addition, the applicant I / shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to _ _ _ City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwlding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Offical after tract/parcel map _/ / recordation and prior to tssuance of budding permits _ _ 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays _ _ _ L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness _ 2 Provide compliance with the Califomta Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/ /_ M. Existing Structures 1 Provtde compliance with the Caltfomia Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings 2 Due to the scope of the protect, an Occupancy Change review is required Submit plans to the / / Budding and Safety Department to determine compliance for the proposed use _ _ _ 3 Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the _/_/ California Budding and Plumbing Codes _ 4 Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on bwldtng plans submitted for bwldtng _/_/ permd applcaton 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be regwred _/_/_ 6 Obtain demolition permit for the removal of existing structures _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be to accordance with Calrfomia Budding Code, City Grading _/_I_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / perform such work _ _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/ / submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the tssuance of building permts SC-1-04 6 Project No DRC2004-00052 Comolehon Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _/_/~ combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access t Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 60 total feet on Base Line Road _/_/_ 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map 5 Additional street right-of-way shall lie dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a mirnmum of 7 _/ /_ feet measured from the face of curbs • P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (intenorstreets, drainagefaalities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Councl Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy, fuel or power to any budding service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or umt, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buldings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development C SC-1-04 ~~~~/~ Protect No DRC2004-00052 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Base Line Road X X (c) X X X X Internal Streets X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item See the protect special conditions of approval Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safetyllght<. on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Gvli Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnortc final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect condut shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the CIty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per CIty Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program r1 LJ Comolehon Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _~ /. -/-/- -/_~ -/-/- / / -~ /_ -/-/- SC-1-04 Protect No DRC2004-00052 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the htie page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are requred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spate Spacing Size Qty See street tree regwrement form -attached Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient defiaencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Q. R. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for rewew and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Base Line Road, from the west tract boundary to the east tract boundary 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer This protect shall be annexed into LMD No 9 and SLD Nos 1 and 8 4 All required public landscaping and irigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 5 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas SC-1-04 Comole6on Date ~/ /~ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-~ Protect No DRC2004-00052 Comolehon Date r1 \_J Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to budding permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way Sandbag for connection(s) to regional trail 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance rf no map is involved 4 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Forin CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED sC-~-oa to l.~i~~S~p -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- _/_~ -~ /_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT ~ STANDARD CONDITIONS September 20, 2004 Van Daele Development Corporation N/O Baseline FJO Etiwanda SFR Tract DRC2004-00052 & SUBTTi 6776 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSG1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gwdelmes for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are• 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. 2. At intersections 3 On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSG2 Fire Flow 1. The regwred fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to prowde the required fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to prowde regwred fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the sde Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project sde FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle . access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. ~'i~.f~' 1,~~ FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has approved your request for an alternate method #05844 (PMT2004-06120). The Homes and garages on lots 22-47 must be equipped with automatic fire Sprinklers in accordance to NFPA 13D. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance wdh the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers'. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. AFS: Obtain a final for the Fire Sprinkler Systems in lots 22-47. 3. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 4. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address wdh minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ,STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM LAST UPDATED 6/3/03 DATE: 2-9-04 T0: RENE GUERRERO, ASSISTANT ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: DAWN ROURK LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT PRO1ECi: DRC2004 00052, SUBTT16776 LOCATION: N/S BASELINE AVE, E/0 ETIWANDA DESIGN NOTES: 1 STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREETTREE UST, BASED UPOI AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-0F-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, LANDSCAPE SECTION A 909-477-2740 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME 3. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY q, INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTHSOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREETTREE LIST. WIND-PRONEAREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE. 5. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INRUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENAN~ EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ONSTTE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. AND OFFSITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILRIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAINTHE CONTEXTOFTHE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMITANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND. 7, STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE fTEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE: STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET ~ (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) EAT HAVEN AVE FDREGRaIND THEE Magnolia grandlflora NCN 8 ~ 15 GAL PA 8' OR GREATER 'Samuel Sommer' ~~ ~ PA LESSTHANBOR Magnogagranddlore'SL NCN 3' ~ 0.~ 15 GAL UNDER POM'ER LNES Mari ~ ~ BACKGROUND TREE Pmus cananensis Canary Island Pme 8' 5 15 GAL PA B OR GREATER N MFDRMAL. USE M OCCASIONALLY BEHIND MAGNaLws 'CCENTTREE Uquidambar styraaflua NCN 8' 25' 0 C 15 GAL 'Festlval' DE STREET ~ D ~ HO GEN ~ NAME REM WITHIN LINE ST EACH STREETAS A SEPARATE CUCAMONGA D TH S E - ~,~,~-~s9 -- RESOLUTION NO OS-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004-01002 FOR WALL HEIGHTS EXCEEDING 8 FEET FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16776, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDAAVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-131-29, 34, 35, 36, 52, 53, AND 55 THRU 58 A Recitals. 1 Van Daele Development Corporation filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2004-01002, as described in the title of this Resolution, in conjunction with theirapplications for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16776 and Design Review DRC2004-00052 Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Variance request is referred to as "the application 2 On January 26, 2005, and continued to February 9, March 9, and March 23, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 26, February 9, March 9, and March 23, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at Base Line Road, a mator divided arterial street, 1,200 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of 706 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,350 feet, and is presently improved with a plant nursery and office, and b The property to the east of the southern portion of the site is vacant The I-15 Freeway off-ramp is approximately 200 feet to the east and the I-15 Freeway travel lanes are approximately 500 feet to the east, and c The proposed project would include the development of 59 single-family detached residences, and d The acoustical analysis (Gordon Bncken & Associates, March 2004) prepared for the protect determined that noise levels exceed City, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Caltrans noise limits, and therefore, recommended sound attenuations bamers such as block walls PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-17 DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 2 e. Variances have been granted forsound wall heights forall other residential protects along the I-15 Freeway 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a That strict or Literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances orconditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district e That the granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the inforration provided to the ~-jl~~}~ l~O~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-17 DRC2004-01002 -VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP March 23, 2005 Page 3 Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chamnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dulyand regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES• COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS • ~'/~~ ,~ /l0~ Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES March 23, 2005 Dan Coleman, Principal Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Re Mora Family Dear Mr Coleman 9NINNb~d - G.~/113~3t1 ~ OH~,NF/~1d0~~ Property Adjacent to Tact 16776 - an Daele De`v~opment This Is as a follow-up to telephone conversations with Clty staff, our client representative, Daniel Mora, and with Pat Van Daele of Van Daele Development concerning the referenced matter on behaff of our client Attached for your review and Information are copies of fax wrrespondence received at our office this afternoon from our client, which is a letter from Michael Van Daele of Van Daele Development, dated January 31, 2005, that addresses the Eucalyptus windrow, building encroachment and drainage Issues and a copy of my a-mad to Pat Van Daele, dated March 22, 2005, that addresses Eucalyptus windrow tree trimming and was a follow-up to my last telephone conversation with Pat Van Daele concerning this matter Our client representative has advised us that the Issues relative to structure encroachment, drainage and windrow tree trimming will have been addressed and resolved based upon completion of the solutions proposed by Van Daele Development In their 1/31/05 correspondence, and as outlined In my March 22, 2005, a-mall to Pat Van Daele, and copses of these documents are enclosed with this correspondence Pat Van Daele also advised me during our earlier telephone conversation that they stand behind their 1/31/05 letter, and he suggested that their letter should be Included In the record for tonight's hearing and he will state their continuing concurrence at the hearing The continuing professional courtesy and assistance extended by the City with this matter is most appreciated on behaff of our client Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional Information or assistance with this matter Sin Charles J Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Enclosures Cc Daniel Mora Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.451.1824 Gry Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd ,Suite 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION aFeb. 2. 2005° 8:13AM"°""'O "''"'°L°° 1°'°""'°"' No. 1940 "P~ 2 ~.~D~ lantraty 31,3045 ~~~~~ ~Q~ Mora Fey Attn: JohttMora 13096Base liae:~xl Rarroho Gltoamor!-g°, Ge 41739 RE: .Few Preporty najaeeat to Tsars ib'lIb DearNlor+Faouly: At se G~ty of Rancho C~lot:~s Plamritrg Commisaoa meeting o=1~2N051be matter oft>=c ~a_~y~a wig row on your ptopmsy and tLe ~•.a^-~.*ing btril~ttg cn ;~ property w=.2~~d in con. jnnctie~n will: denDeek Develop.='~ plans fvr de~~~.•^sat of Tsaot 15776 on the fi?a's peopctty to yow easy. This ]suer proposes wtutiwra to the isssa. r~!!tch eoneen+r~ yaer fitrnily's property. 7n regards to ~e btu ~ yet¢ ptnporty which encroaches across Y~ ~ele'a property line, Vmm I)aele r.~^TCSe~ sUersug the propc!y ~ stoucd slia ena.~eohing bnilditrg so that the cecroachmeat mo longer exists. lt+-s solution wslt elan allow the building m tetr~ie in place mtd avoid r ^s!itim!, thus pres~'rirg the baildtng mtd ^s etas. The lot Grse M-II be altored through a lot litre •djussmeru. Tile c'h~..^' issae dtseostml at sire Plsruting Commisdos wa:t the tsee 1'cle just west of your family's easren prtrparty Hire. As discussed at the PIsvating C.mutiasiaa we *~. t 9lterdd t11e elevasiaax o^ some of our Ims'~ a?hninnte the i,esd B walla and the excavation for wall fx~.r.,;,s associaicd wid: xSeining walls to proearre the root syater^s of the eucalyptus t:^00 witrdrow, Addr'ioaelly, wa pro a pcrimeur wa11s which ~ovould rot regstira footings in ov_ds~ to preserve the susalyptw trees' root >.ystems. we have also shitted sows of our lots as amc*_ zs sewn fact to the east in a further effort to avoid damagjog .t.,e e~alyphrs trees crt your family's prcge!t). Ftte•..:.~^, auy ehaa¢e to cxisling ~rrge pnlperns which stray slicer your 1])rs ptapesty will be accotmted for and saettolled ht ~e revised arg~eaiiiq dssign of 1?aet 16776. 791t0A~ Street- Sr~:.z5 rsorr i4.!) 334.2121 Rivrrstidn, California g250a4378 ):A7L. (951) 354-?996 ~'SI --7g7--`~S1 ~' ZOf~I ~IA2I35.razz.i.wr~I1LL TLT99990CS 'I3.L 44'CT 5002/ZZ/CO ate6. Z. 2005'' 8:13aM° aav aso au. ,.ee,.e un•d...rm... V:a >7aole Dttveloptnad is meeting wig Snsea Sims at the ate of Tract ]E776 o>Z T13r'~5 Yo di5etts8 fitly effects m the eacaYJ~raa R:z.~"~aw which may occur ss a rst» v! wnstnutioa acdvirfea an its ato itl accordmteD with the revisions to the u'Sr'Ci0(7nlenl plmss listed iu she preceding; peragrapb. ylre wili also discuss the health oftlte ttaea is the eoealyptoa .vitidrow and r09Dimsiblo tree trlmmfpg techaiques wttA Susan Sims. van Daela Dav®lopr~-^t r:..~~ to tc~+ove auy dead yr dyi*!g t!+oes on was ~~ family's ptvpvtty, as i~'.za..;5ad ~ ~SaW S:; rts, x~hieh would pose any dmfpar ;. pg~ y~ homeoWaets in Ttaot iSTi8. 'r a3 l~aete DevelopmCIIt aisv ptuppsea t~l.'t8 die ~~.,1, tvnai,m~ healthy trees in the moat xYSpotLdble mateie , Susan Sitw~ wi;i dtrext V® ~ Daele Denelopntart ss m whieii tt~g teehriique is taoat beneiiciai to the euCSlypt~~ t~s' bsolth tend lamg test earYtval Yan Daete DcKlegtnemt twrdd grraraittee the sarvival ofall rEtoainiag tiitnmed ire ~ Li x ene year otter the moetnaittn o9roug}r >~8 acdvlgea for 14ant 76776; '^y tsc x?tich 6ecomeQ a haaatd er potetmai hazard d1~6 ~ tmie ~ P®'t~ weld *~.°. re.".ored and replened by Van Daele Development. ARe<tfia one you period for which Vaa Dade Devektpment is ~ the heaith of the trey expires, your iaroiiy will be [espvnsible for tt~tdairtlAg iLe health of the trees sail tnmoving airy trees which post a harstird to htaatosriters in 7YaM 16776. I ~lSeve tins proposal satisfies your famr7y's crxazta for presrrving the cut;tiy bL~lding and its contents. It slmo glesm.~s yattr lily's eucalyptus tttr witx6ov soil 41in3IDffica year fatrruy'a kabiliiy for darnagx card by trees which msy be affected by rite devtlopmerrt ac4vitits of Trail !ti-76, if this proptst6l lmdaf' ies year stay, please tecrrre know oryvnr ftm»iy's :<ppro~sl so that 1 can pupate a writMa agreement far execution by all psarties irrvolvcd. Pleau feel ftoa tv crmtaet the wi~t- aey gtuxtioos or concerns your family may nave et (931) 3342121. 17>a~[ 3^en, VAN DAF~.E.^.EVhipppui6NT CORPORAT1dN /'/ ~ L• L~~r~'C/ ulCxin$r. c. vaN naetrr Ptvjea Mattag~r No. 1940 ~"P. 3 ~~ ' \\; \~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 3 rn fih ~TAHAST~AJ(TN~TN.L TLT99990CS 13.L fiU~CT SOOZ/ZZ/CO Print ~ Close Window Subject: Mora Property Tree Trlmmtng Inquiry Follow-up From: Chuck Buquet <chuck~chasjoseph.com> Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2005 7:10 pm To: Pat Van Daele <pjv~vandaele.wm> Cc: Charlie <Charlie~Chas7oseph.com>, Suzanne <Suzanne(tLChas7oseph.com>, Dan Coleman <DCOlemanC~cl.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us>, Vance Pomeroy <vpomeroy~cl.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us> Pat This is as a follow-up to our last telephone conversation concerning your interest and offer vntti trimming the Eucalyptus vnndraw trees located along the common boundary of your prolect and the Mora Family property I am pleased to inform you that I was iust contacted by the family representative and have obtained then concurrence and cooperation with your company pertorming this activity on their property They believe that your offer may serve to reduce tree stress impacts that may be associated with development that will occur along this common property line with your proposed project, and vnsh to cooperate with your efforts and good faith offer to trim these trees The only stipulation that they have is that this tree trimming actively must be performed by a certified tree trimming contractor and monitored by a Certified Arborist in order to ensure the tramming actively is conducted consistent welh industry standards and as to minimize potential liability exposure for the vanous property owners of interest It is also then understanding and consistent welh your and my conversation that this actively will be performed solely at the expense of Van Daele Communities Our client will allow for the access necessary to the property to accomplish the desired tree trimming activity and you and I can work out the specific details at the appropriate time for this activity to occur in a timely manner. We are going to ask that the City include this tree trimming activity agreement as a component of the Planning Commission project approval to assist with establishing an additional level of comfort for our client that this activity will occur as promised by your company We do not anticipate that you should have a problem with this as rt is as a component of our responsive follow-up to your initial inquiry and offer to tram these windrow trees Thanks for your help with this and let me know how we can be of any further assistance to you in this regard, as our objective is to facilitate constructive good faith cooperation and mutual benefit among the vanous parties of interest. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunely should you have any questions or need of additional information or assistance with this matter. Thanks Chuck Buquet, President Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Blvd Suele 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-481-1822 909-481-1824 fax www.chasjoseph.com http //emarl email secureserver net/vtew_pnnt php~foldet=INBOX Sent_Items&utd=4107 3/23/2005 • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE March 23, 2005 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16971 - AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to subdivide 3 2 net acres of land into 18 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 0210-062-39 Related Files Variance DRC2004-01163, Minor Exception DRC2005-00189 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885 VARIANCE DRC2004-01163 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES, INC - A request to allow the lot depth for Lots 6 and 8 for SUBTT16971 to be less than the minimum 90 feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 0210-062-39 Related Files Tentative Tract SUBTT16971, Minor Exception DRC2005-00189 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Project Density Zone range 4 to 8 units per gross acre; proposed density. 4 14 units per gross acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Vacant residential with approved Tentative Tract SUBTT16311, Low-Medium Residential District South - Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium Residential District East - Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium Residential Distnct West - Cucamonga Creek flood control channel, Open Space, Flood Control Distnct C. General Plan Desionations• Protect Site - Low-Medium Residential North - Low-Medium Residential South - Low-Medium Residential East - Low-Medium Residential West - Open Space, Flood Control Items "C" R "D" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16971 AND DRC2004-01163-AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 2 D Site Characteristics The subject site is currently vacant with 14 trees, 11 of which are heritage trees. The site is generally flat with a slight drop from north to south The site is a narrow triangular shape with the point on the southerly end Abutting the 315-foot wide northerly project boundary is approved Tentative Tract SUBTT16311, a subdvision of the former Blessent property. The gated community "The Hawthorns" abuts the site to the east with Cucamonga Creek flood control channel defining the westerly edge. A future regional trail is identified on the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan (General Plan Exhibit III-13) along the flood control channel. ANALYSIS A General: This project is a subdivision of 4.35 acres into 18 single-family residential lots with adouble-loaded single street The original proposal for 19 lots was reduced to 18 lots following the recommendation of the Design Review Committee. The proposed street enters through the approved Tentative Tract 16311 to the north The development of this site depends on the completion of the street improvements in that tract. A second access is provided in the form of an emergency access off of the easterly side of the cul-de-sac This 30-foot-wide emergency access is gained over turf block onto Old Post Drive in The Hawthoms via a tubular steel gate with a Knox box for fire department use A minor exception has been requested by the applicant to allow for wall heights above 6 feet and below 8 feet for retaining walls along the east side of the flood control channel behind Lots 4 through 6. The proposal inGudes a variance request for lot depth. Proposed Lot 6 and Lot 8 are proposed at approximately 43 feet and 64 feet deep respectively The minimum lot depth for the Low-Medwm Residential zone is 90 feet The extremely unusual site shape lends to the justifying Grcumstances to grant the variance for these lots The resulting lots do retain sufficient bwldable area to allow reasonable development that will not compromise the intention of the zone. Lot depths are calculated by using the center points of converging lines and the lot depth dimension for these lots are surpassed along the north side of each lot. B Desion Review Committee: The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on December 14, 2004, and recommended approval subtect to combining Lots 7 and 8 of the original proposal (resulting in Lot 7 of the current proposal) and matching the wall materials used in The Hawthoms for the perimeter walls C Technicel Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and rewmmended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Draft Resolution of Approval. D. Grading Review Committee. The Committee reviewed the project on February 15, 2005, and recommended approval The proposed storm drain is to empty into Cucamonga Creek. E Neiohborhood Meeting The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on December 8, 2004 The meeting was sparsely attended and the project met some questions about walls abutting The Hawthoms from the attendees. General satisfaction was expressed. ~, ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16971 AND DRC2004-01163 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 3 F Environmental Assessment. The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study The staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality during the site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-significant level The protect will also have an impact upon biological resources due to the proposed removal of 11 on-site heritage trees under the related Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885 application An arbonst study was prepared to evaluate the health and condition of these Vees. The arbonst recommended removal of all trees and replacement is proposed as mitigation measure. If the Planning Commission concurs, then an issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be m order VARIANCE DRC2004-01163 FACTS FOR FINDING The applicant is requesting a variance to allow two lots to have a lot depth less than the 90-foot minimum regwred m this zone Lot 6 and Lot 8 are proposed at approximately 43 feet and 64 feet deep respectively. The minimum lot depth for the Low-Medwm Residential zone is 90 feet The extremely unusual site shape and the need to provide two means of access for the protect site provide lustifymg circumstances to grant the variance for these lots The resulting lots do retain sufficent buildable area to allow reasonable development that will not compromise the intention of the zone The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards; however, the Planning Commission must make the following findings m order to approve the request. The following are facts to support these findings 1 Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result m practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the ob~ectrves of the Development Code. FacUs: The applicant has requested flexibility with the lot depth for those lots that are compromised solely by the extreme aspect of the site shape while retaining sufficient buldable area on the lots. The proposed lot depths are calculated by using the center points of converging lines and the lot depth dimension is surpassed along one side of the lot. 2 Fmding~ That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same district. FacUs. The protect site is unusual because of the thin Viangular shape created by the bend in Cucamonga Creek. 3. Fmdin That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speed regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties m the same district Facts Without the Variance, the protect would be deprived of privileges entoyed by other owners within the same district to develop single-family residences on lots with sufficient buildable area. The proposed lot depths are calculated by using the center points of converging Imes and the lot depth dimension is surpassed along one side of the lot. C, ~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16971 AND DRC2004-01163 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 4 Finding That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal pnvdege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties or improvements in the vicinity Facts Because the location of the site next to the turn in the flood control channel is unusual, the proposed protect faces a constraint not found on other properties in the area 5 Finding That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the warnty Facts Granting of the Vanance wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vianity Based on the above analysis, staff believes that there are sufficient facts to support the findings CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the protect through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Br Buller City Planner BB VP\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" -Plot Plan Lot Studies (Lots 6 and 8) Exhibit "E" -Minor Exception for wall height (sections and plot) Exhibit "F" -Design Rewew Committee Action Comments dated December 14, 2004 Exhibit "G" -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16971 Draft Resolution of Approval for Vanance DRC2004-01163 L~ C, ~ ~ TopoZone -The Web's Topographtc Map 1W470DJMw1~Y~Y, YC -, •1 . ., , ~ 1..1.Q 5 ~ I _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ... I1 9TH I c ; .. .•'. .. G : - Ka 7owersp ~ ~(KASK!o • I -- D r ~~{ ~. i / ~i2 - U Sch rr~~r~ ~~~~T Tjnk- r ~~ ' •- - rl~h' ~~. _ _ _ ~x-c ~ z ~ri.~ ~= _ _ _ _w~ _ -, .. •~V s`~'"K.. ~ i ~ . C-.~x_-.ii a -r.a 1 9° 4 I ..eRm_i!.140; __ _ q" i=_ - i~ _ ~ _ _ - Y •i _ /LK.S _ ~«__ Pro~ectLocahon~_Rio ~~ ! ~~- d -= 4'+~b+u.M J~-ue ~ a ~>>__s ~.~~ ~r :~e°"'at> > ~ ---'-----~ .?ry 2 =Y A .mot-~_ -....... -. v._. Y4_ _ 'FYI' .':.11.~ • Tari1= - - - _ .. ~. r Page 1 of 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km ~ G ' 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ml Map center Is UTM 11 444475E 3771533N (WG584/NAD83) N GUASTI quadrangle M=13.414 Prolectlon Is UTM Zone 11 NAD83 Datum G=-0.337 1' ll ~, ~ s http //www.topozone com/pnnt asp~z=11 &n=3771533 00008463&e=444474 999999995&s=50&stze=l&lay 3/3/2005 ~ I e ~ i Bg I co ~ 3~ .,,,.• ~, - - ------ 1----------- 3y` ~ r 5 a .,.,~, a..wp cyp`f C I I ~ 1•' II II I I I 2 y i ~L0.9[ G4 dVW UVL'1 { 1 I I I I ~_ , ~ .~~I I -,', 11 11 I' 'I ' I ~ I II , ~ I ~~ q~ _J 1 1 I II °1 -'~ r~r ~2~ ~, 1111 I, g `~~ ~~ =_ I~~ y 1 11 I ~ I u ~ ~' _ ~ ~~~r~ ~ 11 II 'I ', uyt~er2~6 I~~ ~_ ~~ 1141 I II ~ 1 ,1~p~ j y ~_~1~ 4 1~1 I ~ ~ K- MPP I 110 1 I r it \1 11 I ~ If- ~1 ~ \ f~ ~' 11 I' it m 1 ~~ s ~ [ :~` ~ 1 ' ~~ _ "w i. , b-LZLb db'W 1JYE(L ~ 1 1 I i i I I i - .~ ~ - i r f ~ I ~ S _ - I ~~ I ~ UE3[ ON 1JV4i1 _ I I I sAl1VLN31 ~ ~I .~ . ~ ~ _~ { .. , -~,~,~_ \ I i ' ~-~\~\~1_L_ L L.. r ~---,.~,-..,~a~.- I N111 ~I I I I I_ I--~ ~-~-~IIL ~11 I~ III~ I Ii~~ggs ~ f I ~J~~I~~ ,roa,us,wsi 2~1~ wm3w v..n. If a ~~-GII~(^ ~-I t Ir~ i i I ~ I~II~t I~Igl~ti _~L '_r~ ff i I ICI u 11 i ~i iC-r~-~I i I I ,I ~~, -~ - {- -, r s m, ,00 t=.1 31tl75 ~" `, ~~~ fit I rF lw~ irk-~•~lJ~'' ~ ~ -~'Il~'•~\ I 1 ~~l- \ -~,} •, ~~ C, ~ ~ U g~ S w 1 I i 1 F e I e a i I [ IP. ail ~i ill ' ~~~ ~4 cj•E !, ~' FsF _~~4 ~»g l~f I Y ~ ~_ O I d I:~ °p t I ^-~ L2,eg ~--1~ ~Uist~ 4 R'e }I tt gBpp I a}~ I~+I 99 E 1, 6ii - r1}I1 ~ ~ ~i ' ~.:- :wuar~ Z `~~ W ~ I ' ~ 'ems o+~_I .I II n ~} I ° II n IH1~--- u II °} ~C`I ))I1 ~ U 111 ~ ' ~~J °"!l ~~ ~ ~% ti - ~ q ^~~~~ n} .. ~ .~ } ! 17r !f `~ ~; _Q~• ~ ~ iy yS l e t Pr l f =1 ~ ~~ 1 e. '`t t ~ I is i ~ :=: t4`55PIi e !I v ~•~~} 7P~~ ~ ~ ~ s ~~~~1~ ~j ~ I 5 [t~ . ie yi i~-. [ '~iyiS I' gl~= 3 «~1~ _ ttis~3 ~ii •^- wIi 4 i u aY }}t n i~ I $ C Z ~ ~j !! liy#' r` F $ 1 F~ ~ t it ~ "-5~ ~~til ~~sFl~! ~ti}i X31 ~y ~ ~r ! [~ '• i~~i 9 I Ii i~; ~t `} _ ~ [[ !!M ~ .. \ 4 ' tit . I( ~3 9 I 6. 1~~ e Y 4' ~ I 17 it. W ' i E ~1~~ ° ! a it ~ I ! I g~i `I } 91 I w I =i i. 6~ g~ ` • _= ~! e ' ,_ ~ ~ t~~ ~ r" dl a ~-m ! c t~~~ uWi _ ;} ,~ _: - F--- ~ f4 ~ ~ a i , ~ li g~i y ', 4 11 ~. ~,} V~! I .! ~~ ~G -'i I 8. R t 1'• bit ~__ ~~ / '~ 1~ 1= ~' a /, ii a I / \ ~ ! . 9 #--- ~~F I ita t! ~ i l tt:. 6• I I ;I I I: I 1... III I ~!€ I ~i I i I I ~~ll Ei~j ! 3ps ~ 't~ ~'j~ cif ~~~~ J~ § U=II to ~ a d n C ~~ 9. ~, _--=- 'D' ' 74 ~~. 73 ._. ~ ' 77 10' 77 81~ 1 Oi ~ ', 5' i, a ~5 w ,-'i 2' ', ~ --- ~ ' ~I _~ a r 145.58' ~U ,~ R O6 00 ~ ) ~ ~--~~/ M ~ 10' ,- ij EL _ / i ~NANN CONTR'A` -~ / F~-~~~"" ~.~~~ of ,...- . „- ~~• ~~/ e..~.,-.,~ ~, ~ ~ GA _ -~ -,-.-~ - - ~ - -~ - - -- - -- - - Prepared In The Office Of Job No LOCKMAN~&~ ASSOCIATES PLOT PLAN LOT S TUO Y 03-3639 Consulting Engineers and Planners LOT 6 Sheet 1 Rao° ho~Cu~re onga CAt97730 COOK PROPERTY-C/TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tei yes) s4a-sssa Fax isos> sas-s5os ~ for: American Pacific Homes Of 4 ~~y i i ~ _X,~ ~ ~ ~~, / ~ ~~ % I~ ~ S'IE ~v --~~~,~ i 1Z 1 1 1 Q . +, ~~ , U `\ _ ` 1 --- ~~`\ 1 ~~ V ~' ~ O - \ \ ~ ., ,\ ~ \ O ~,9 \1 \ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~'\~1 ~ ~~~ e o ~ ~ °o~ ~ ~ `\\\ \\\1 O ~ , ,~ .~u 1~, ~ \\ \ Y % ~ ~ ~ 1 U ~ ,1 \, ;-, ~'~, . ~\ o °' „ '~ ~ .\ ~m '~~ ~ ~~ ~K. ~' 9'6S , e- ~ " ~ Io ~ I` _ ~~ 0 ~, 9'Z~ 9'6E I _Pe~dpJpogs(~nui7 ,1__, .vs ooL O n A~ ~ ~ ,Of l 31V35~ ,Z£ E L L 9'S~' ~ of ~ o ~ o ~ ~ .a o u C ~ J ' A i ~~ ~ I MI ~ V of y Z Q J 0 V) z y v~ ~`~ Z= 0 JI.~° a ~~ Z4 ~~ Q vQ 0 V H m o C ~ C ~ U 19 M~ G. m r ,~ ~O ~NV~ m~ ~ ErnLL do c~y C°@E $ mr8~ ca~~ $z W~ogW a~ mo~~ j ~K o N ~ Ov ~ 4 ., STREET RNV PROPOSED BLOCK WALL TO MATCH EXISTING LOT 6 ~ ~ 47.>0'- Proposed Pad EI = 1038.5± ~ MAX 8' CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL Prepared In The Office Of Consulting Engineers and Planners 14125 TELEPHONE AVENUE CHINO, CA 91710 Tel (909) 548$418 Fax (909) 54&6841 EXH/B/T A TYP/CAL WALL SECT/ON TENTAT/VE TR4CT 16971 1~-3639 Sheet 1 1 ~ ~ ~,~ w ~. ~ .., ~ i•1 1.,0'S' ~- --= -'' ( 1 ~ 0"1'" ~ cif - 1 \ _ ~ u~ _ ~ ~ r\ ~ ^' ^" ^55 OB' "" 5590 ~~ __ ___ W 5590' 5709' 55 5500 65(1!1' - 6509'___ _ ~ 47 O p ~ , ! ~ ->, l - - ^F 115 ExlsMg S' ,_~, ..f ~ 1 ° B l 0 1 h I Oooorobvo exxat • ~ ~ -• ^^o ~ ______ v v ~ Waa }o Reawm 51 ~`_~ 8 nl ~ of ~~ A'GIl7 A ~ 15 a 14 a J3 nl ~ 12 1 1 ~ ' 5,A6/ s l' °+ 5, c /1` 5,~" s f °+ lO 1~ J x lii7'~_J~ ~ X781 s 1 & O1 M '~ u l 6/~T3L,s 7 umi M _ 1 410 1 ,^.~ 6,1 S I '~ 70395 10390 0.495 10380 `; v i, 5 !! 5„~f 1Y $ h 11B '~ ~1 S ! `~ 1 0 0 ~ ! ~ I ~---/ iJ 939 $ B,~ s /~ 'O ~ ~0 i -6'(]aH rile) fOp10 m M ~ 10920 ` 'ti 50 39' S70P ~~ ~~ ° g8 T8' _------_' _`Y'-_-----~_,~_ 1]05 3~ I ' 25~ 1 _--__^~ 2 q3. ~_,__ _ - 1 ~ ~__ i ~ ~~__9 21 74 X55 10 6610' / i ~I 0820' / ~ ~~Y~ Stre t arr/94}ga\9'SS~~- -- - ~ ° „dSFe' ,. `~ m 3303' 22 Of' ~~.~ / `,~o • -~- --- ~ _~w _ FS~_~?~` 24'S ~ ==24"~ ~ ~ i' 77 59' I m 7813• ~` ~~ ~,_ ~ -_ _-'- (04x1 55% ~ rs ~,. r . ~- ~ ~52 23' P -B'Cwb (iYP) 1 1 tv Ty' ~~~-- _ _ _. P~ Ao1 9S -~ r - - --~~~ ~ 6 9759• ~ ~I l~ 5 5'w 4~ - '~ h ~ ~ f ~~$. •~ -_ - _~ s! m 10385 ~ ~ i `__ /~ -P' v 4 $, }0390 ~ / r ~ S ! ^ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' •\ y P1 unposed abve Blorir i /~ r i 3 , ~ ~~ s ! wan ra Exvag waa r~ e 99cfed wm am 2 , ~1~~0 45 eg ~ aw}Ipnree ~° 47 ~ 1 o snssr ti ; , F ~ NGPFm. - `' = 10450 5.4Y9 s ! ~i _ 1 ,,,yam m ~ C lwzo ~~ 4 ~ r~ `r215~G~p) 185 -,-~- ,:,. ~pF PNG~1i Cj~\0 ~ '' •/ f ~ ~ Exhibit A R R ,, "-_"~ ' ~1g' 1 r CAS 9I1" ?217 ~ ~ r' ~'~ ~ ~ " _ ,,,r - QOVI551RY FbodPro(eglo9 We9 _-- ~ io _ __._ _~___~_ __ 771 /~ -Ex}erq Flood Wea 5vm T781d 15311 -~~- -- ~^- ~^ _ r. '~Y _ _ ' ~- --~-~~98~ _ _ SUBTT 16971 ~~ i - - --- ----- ---- - ' _.. a . Y ,L ~"' , , "" ~~ ,~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Vance Pomeroy December 14, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to subdivide 3 2 net acres of land into 19 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street -APN. 0210-062-39. Related File• Vanance DRC2004-01163. VARIANCE DRC2004-01163-AMERICANPAGIFICHOMES,~NC -Request to allow the lot depth for Lots 6 and 9 of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16971 to be less than the minimum 90 feet in the Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street -APN• 0210-062-39. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16971. Backoround/Desion Parameters The applicant is proposing a 19-lot subdivision of a 4.35-acre parcel southeast of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street alongside Cucamonga Creek The project is proposing to take pnmary access off of "D" Street in Tract 16311 (Blessent) to the north with a secondary emergency-only access from Tract 15727 (Golden Oaks) to the east. No product designs accompany this proposed subdivision The extremely narrow aspect of the protect parcel shape generally limits the choices available for parcel layout and lot shapes. The applicant is requesting a Vanance for the two lots that cannot meet the minimum lot depth for this zone. Plotting studies were provided for the most unusual lots in the tract (Lots 6 through 9) to give the applicant an opportunity to show that houses can fit on these lots The study for Lot 6 does not meet the 15-foot rear yard dimension, which is especially indicative of the shallowness of this proposed lot A Regional Multi-Purpose Trail is indicated along the Cucamonga Creek Control Channel abutting the protect site. The applicant has indicated that a neighborhood meeting will be conducted pnor to the Design Review Meeting on December 14, 2004. The results will be shared with the Committee at that Ume. Staff Comments• Maior Issues• The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect• The depth of Lots 6 and 9 should be viewed in the context of the applicant's proposed "Limits of Pad" indicated on the map If the "Limits of Pad" are viewed as a de facto lot line and the narrowing remainder as an unusable remnant, the seventy of the shallowness becomes apparent, especially for Lot 6. A re-arrangement of the lots may result in a better distnbuUon. Secondary Issues• Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design Issues• The maximum height for penmeter walls for the protect ~s 6 feet Several sections indicate heights up to and over 8 feet. A deviation of up to two feet requres a request for a Minor Exception A deviation over two feet requires a request for a Vanance 1 ~ it ~ j+~ ~ '1 DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES • December 14, 2004 Page~,2 ,r- 2 Provide a pedestnan/cyclist access gate to the future regional trail along the flood control channel between Lots 6 and 7 Policy Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion• 1 Call out the type of decorative matenal to be used forthe penmeter wall of the site and provide a typical elevation. Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends the Committee review the proposal and provide comments on the Vanance and continue the item for further review Desinn Review Committee Action: Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy Members Present. C~ ~J C, ~ ~3 AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16971 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA USGS QUAD SHEET SHEET 1 OF 1 •• I C ~ •~ DY h _ ,~. _ _ _ _ JJJ[[[ ` _ - F _ EDER ~- ~ ~ ~ - UtI~ 1 ~~` \ I. I -- r- ~ t ~_ , ~ ~~ ~ _ _~Y ~, - -4 ~ ~i - ~ > ~t ~~ 15 ~F i - I •i f i . ~' Ct.• ~ - ~:~~ ~ I CON ~, ~ / 1 ~ •}•1 'e 1 T , _ _ J ~' ~ I f~ 11Pr~ °' ` ~ H v.,~.•+~•••~ --~ I - ~ ~ ~ ra I ji II I~I 1 ~IJL IV t ?,;;n~ 11 . 1_ J F'arkr (i. -X I L 1 j 1 I Corona ~ 1~_.J~ ~ L4-! T j . i 1 QI ' 1 Sch . a .- 11~ ~, ~ ' ~ 1 i 1 1 ~ Y FF -- - ~ - - - T t• iL ~ I I - - :~`~ -,'r-Water I Tank _ ~yyeli '",\ ~ - - ~° , :I ~~,~ I i - - a- - ~ C3 i ~ ~ . - ,f~- I . 1~ / ~ ~ II ~ _ • ~ II ___ _ _ _ _ _ .1 _ ~ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _f ~DtA•pva+Cq'~~htD9V DdwmlamaG }6 WAtl SamrDaa tSG• ry°n li kaYl l_~D•Nl'D•~n~ LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Planners '\ /~ 14125 Telephone Avenue, Suite 1 C~ Chino CA 91710 Tel(909) 548-6418 Fax (909) 548-6841 • __ Gry of RanMO Cucamonga Planning DiWSion leos) an-rrso ~J ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Par# I -Initial Study) (Please type or poor clearly using ink Use the tab key to move /rom one line to the next line ) The {iur-posecoY't_His for~m~-ts~to inform tte_Gi - =of_the=basic-components of the;proposedr, F ~ ro ect~so'that,thetGity;may,review.tlie ~roieci pYursuant to Clry Poltcfes, Ordinances, and! ' Guidehnes,= the California., Environmental duality Act, antl the -City's Rules and. F~•-[. -'t~~0-.F\M1~-.Fy4a4*±~. r`~^1 r51r-.~t,~i~. l--s - .. bT__y ^/ ,Procedures~to?Impl~ement~,CEQA' It is imp~orian~t3that_ilSe informatw'onvrequestedsiri`this..=~ e appitca~tton be~provtded3m~~~fu_-lil^~ F ,~ 4., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r f~ 4; , ~_U~ ~ee~,of the, completd` I nt~ial Study~Part~) and the development~apPltcatton,f,, ~aJditionalm o ati"o',nsh~,`gas;..,by~t~not~l~mr~t'edtlo,-atXafftc,-noise, b olog c~a~l;~drainage; and„ .d g~eolog r~~eports~may ae}$equ~i~ tl~ The project application will not be deemed complete 'yu ~~esth~i~den~tifietl^ pf ~c~al:studs/reports'f~are~sub~mfttedpfor reuse ~d accepted.as;~. coin^lete~a d=ad~equate~^The`.~'roiect-application wUlFnot be scheduled.ior Commtttees~=~; 4Y`.. Y:°~=~{Aa~ ,~'+°~~5`4~i'#~1'4`ra~~"`.a~~~'Cr ~'. a.~~r=.^'. ~'Sj.,'~ s' *ci "gfeL -~, zx~,,Y ~X° x`r.,t~"Cir ~" t +:~^,r'~'m"`.«~.iK~",~ "" .y R °F~V~,"~ revievr.~t,~nl,~-essy~al~~,rye-,~qutr,~ed~r~e,~o_r,=ts~,,~;arexsutimftted;and deemetl complete~foE~s~aff,~„~to~;^~ ,,~ E~prepar~e~~the~ln ~o~bl ~t~oareor re m}b ~se~he Cityats agents,`hoffic!e's"•falii~d/or~~~; ;}appl~cva~ !!Ilo~~alP s s~fo ~the°~~~re'~araii'o~~ev%ew; ,analysis;°~rgcoirinendatijoti4s,~ilp~ -~consu~ltan ~ ,. *P P ,~~4ia~~~,~.t „z _ •, :„~ .~ , ~, ..x...w*~.,~.r s^ ~~ sr Fa"15/~ .trf'9. -. '~.*~' av..is. .,~ ~'"• :.•: ~,°,,, 3: .4 n `" i?'f}Yi. e' i'~1 i~~b P ~, ~"a` ri<'~"fi t . j?~~5"'" ^k" i 1 u S ~ r ~c~A Ili ~Fi~ ~ 7~y ' ~'•,,~ 9 1~stiadles On"[e ~OrtS~ai-_',_`,~ '-~ 'T3*~~iryxi~~"~,'d~.'"~::a"' ~yik,~~Y~F~i ~~tl y~'aki~llt~i ~i i,i~li~iN~ ,~iriit~~g`a~1Ol~~~~etc~'~ ~any~p.~~, r.~~-~ ,y~~, P .~ ~~ ~ ,. ~„~~ ~, ~, ApphcahonNumberlorthepro~ecttowhichthislormpertams Tentative Tract Map 16971 ProlectTitle- Tentative Tract Map 16971 NameBAddresso/pro/ecfowner(s) Cook Investment Company, Ltd., a California L\mited Partnershi Lee E. Stark General Partner BAddresso/developerorpro/ecrsponsor Mr John N Snell Executive Vice President ame 4 59 Palo Verde Street Suite B-1 Montclair, CA 91763 1 \PLANNINGU=INAL\FORMS\COUNTERUnitial Study Pan? docPage t ~/~ ~~ Rev 3/77/04 INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWILLNOTBEPROCESSED Please notetnatrrlsrnerespons~omryoi~neuppnw„~~~~o~~~...=~,at the applicabon !s complete et the Gina o/submittal, Ciry stall will not be evadable to peAorm work required to prowde missing mlormabon Contact Person 8 Address Charles W.'.Lockman, P.E. Lockman & Associates, 14125 Telephone Avenue, Suite 1 • Chino CA 91710 Name & Address of person prepanng this torn (d ddlerent /rom above) Same a s above Telephone Number (909) 548-6418 '1) Prowde a lull scale (8-1/2 x 1 f) Dopy o/ fhe USGS Ouadrent Sheet(s) which includes fhe pro/ect site, erYd Indicate the site houndanes. ' 2) Prowde a set of crolor photographs that show representative wows into the sde /rom the nortlt, south, east, and west; wows into end from the site /rom the pnmary access points that serve the sde; and representcbve wows of signr(cant lectures from the sde Include a map shoKnng location of each photograph. 3) Pro/ectLocation(descnbe)• On the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street east of Cucamonga Creek west of Tract 15727 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addd~onal sheet r/necessary): APN - 10-062-039 •5) GrossSdeArea(adsq h)• 4 35 Ac (189 486 sq. ft.) '6) Net Srte Aree (total sde s¢e minus area of public streets & proposed 3.2 AC ded~cabons) (139 392 0 sq ft ) 7) Descnbe eny proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would aflect the pro/ect site (attach add~bonal sheet ll necessary)' Norte 11PtANNINGIFINAL~FORMSI000NTERUnillel Study Part1 docPege 2 ~ ` Rev. 3/17/04 Inlormabon rndkated by an estensk (') rs not required of nonconstrucbon CUP's unless otherwise requested by stag 8) Include a descnphon olal~ permits which w~/l be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agenaes m order to lolly implement the prolect Tentative Tract Map Development / Design Review d P 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the sde as rt exists be/ore the prolect mcludmg mformahon on topography, sod stabt6ry, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any extshng structures on site (mcludmg age end condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs of stgndicant features described In add~GOn, cite all sources o/mformaGon (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, btoGc and archeological surveys, traKcsmdies) ~ne,4>ro.1.~r` "' " " "` 4 35 Ac of vacant land easterly and ad3acent to Hellman Avenue south of 6th Street @ approximately the intersection of Hellman Avenue and the Cucamon a Creek. The property to the east ~s single-family residential m t s bdivided under Tract 15127, the Hawthorns. The property to the nnrth ,c grant rnnti ,n9 of 10 R Ac approved fior a residential development • of 47 units as Tentative Tract 16311. The property to the east is light industrial in the Cit of Ontario. The site slopes north to south @ approximately 2~ the site is geologically stable and has been recently Previous structures have been removed, there is nn ctgpificant plant lif or animal life on the site. 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cite all sources o1 in/ormation (books, published reports and oral history) I,PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTERVnltial Study Partt docPage 3 vi 4~ ` / Rev 3/17/04 noise from Ontario International Airport and noise lev~ls associated with i ]) Descnbe any Horse sources and thetrlevels that now al/ect the site (arroratt, roadway noise, etc) and how they wtll allect proposed uses Automobile traffic on Hellman Avenue and on 6th Street, occasional aircraft Public Park Improvements and adioining rac,Aential land use. 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate ~escnpGOn o/the site rn feints of ultimate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect. indicate r/ there are proposed phases /or development, fhe extent o1 development to occur with each phase, and the anttctpated compleuon of each Increment Attach add~LOnal sheet(s) r1 neoessery~ The orooosed oroiect consists of subdividing 4.35 Ac into 19 sinole-family 5 X61 c t snit maximum lnt c vp of ^1 7q6 cn f+ Tha rnnctrurtinn/axtansinn of Old Post Drive, a residential street with the associated public and private utilities. The proiect shall be constructed in one phase. 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including rn/ormahon on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, orscenic aspects Indicate the type o/land use (restdentlel, commerwal, etc ), intensity o/land use (one-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, /rontage, setbacl4 rear yard, etc ) The parcel to the north consists of 10.8 Ac and is approved fora 47 unit residential development under Tentative Tract 16311. The property to the east and south is single family residential development (The Hawthorns), to the west light industrial. 14) Wdl the proposed pro/act change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general eras o/ the pro/ectl No, the proposed pro,7ect shall be consistent with the residential development to the east and south and shall be an extension of the development approved under Tentative Tract 16311. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERUnitial Study Partt doePage 4 `~~ ~ " ~ Rev 3/17/04 15) Indicate the type olshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, Including source and amount How will these noise levels altect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods olsoundprooling are proposed Short-term and long-term not se shall be ltmtted to Horse levels -_ consistent with low to medium density residential development. No impacts to adinining land uses '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o1 mature or scenic trees Th re w i 11 be remoy a 1 or nnn s7..g~ifi ant -aly,p is r s dy~iroximately 6 This will be mitigated by a ratio of aRnrnximate~~ 3 to 1 reeiarPmPnt trPPS by landscaped Street Parkways. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains E X t s t i n q S t0 rm Drain systems constructed by Tract 15727, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control Districts Channel, Cucmonga Creek. 18) Indicate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct at 9B7-2591 a Residential (gaUday) 13.400 Peak use (gal/Day) 20.000 b CommeroiaUlnd (gaUday/ac) N • A • Peak use (gaUmin/ac) N . A 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ~%] Sewer Il septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests I/discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expecteddailysewagegeneration (SeeAttachmentAtorusageestimates) ForturtherclanficaGOn,pleasecontactfhe Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct et 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) 5,,, Inn b Commero~aUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) N • A RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units ~9_ Detached (indicate range o/ paroel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size A v e ~q o ~ t o ~ a 15 7 330 sµ~~ Minimlm loY size er,~als 5 361 sa ft and maximum lot Size equals 20,296 sq. ft. Attached (indicate whether units are rental or (orsale units) N . A I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERUniGal Study Pant docPage 5 l~J ~ I a Rev 3/17/04 21) Ant~ctpated range of sale pnces andror rents SalePnce(s) $ 250,000 to $ 400,000 Rent (per month) $ -- to $ -- ~) Specdynumbero/bedrooms byunrttype Unknown, estimated to be 3 bedrooms minimum to 5 bedrooms maximum. 29) lnd~cateanGCipatedhouseholdsrlebyunlttype Unknown, estimated to be approximately 2,000 sq. ft. to 3,000 sq. ft. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wAl be resdmg Knthtn the pro/ect Contact the eppropnete School D~stncLS BS shown !n Attachment B a. Elementary _10_ b. Junior High. ? c Senior Hlgh r COMMERC/AL /NDUSTR/AL. AND /NST/TUT/ONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type o/use(s) and ma/or tunc6on(s) of rwmmercral, mdusMa/ or insfitut/ona/ uses 26) Total Boor area of commerael, mdustnal, orlnsbtuuona/ uses by type. N.A. II.A. 27) Indicate hours of operehon• 28) Number of employees Total: N . A . Maximum Shrh. N . A . Time of Maximum Shd[ ~~ • A I ~PLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTERUnitial Study Part1 docPage 6 ~J ~ ~ Rev 3/17/04 29) Provide breakdown o/anhapatedlob c/ass~(icat~ons, mclud~ng wage and salaryranges, as well as an md~ca6on of the rate of hire for each classdicat~on (attach additional sheet d necessary) N. A. 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to 6e hued that currently reside in the City N . A . '31f For commeraal and industrial uses only, md~cate the source, type, and amount of an pollution emissions (Data should be venf~ed through the South Coast A~rQuality Management District, at (818) 572-6283)• N. A. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their ~abtlity to prowde adequate service to the proposed prolect~ l1 so, please indicate their response Yes, water and sewer shall be provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District. Fire protection by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Flood Control protection by local storm dram systems maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples ofhazardous and/ortox~c materials include, but are not limned to PCB's, rad~oactrve substances, pest~c~des and her6ic~des, fuels, ods, solvents, and other flammable l~gwds and gases Also note underground storage ofany of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known The site was historically utilized as vineyards. The site has not been utilized fo a r,r't oral ourooses for at least 10 years based on available infnrmatinn There is no visual evidence of hazardous materials associated I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNiERUnital Swdy Partt docPage 7 ~~ ~ ~ Rev 3/17Po4 34) Wtlltheproposedprolectmvolvethetemporaryorlong-term use,storage,ord~schargeo/hazarclousandrortoxrcmaterials, including but not limited to those examples listed above 11 yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method o/ disposal The lacat~on of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans None I hereby certiy that the statements /um~shed above and m the attached exh~btts present the data and lnlormabon requtrod for adequate evaluation o/ this pro/ect to the best ofmy abd~ty, thatthe /acts, statements, and inlonnahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I /urther understand that add~honal inlonnat~on maybe regwred to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Cay o/Rancho Cucamonga Date: April 16,'2004 Stgnt °""- ~ -~. ~~ sip f ESSI~/V `z. ~4~~o~SW1LBUq ~~l r2 . ~ aQ ~~ c . ~ v 9 m ~ Na. 424lf5 ~ ~ Exu,s%a~~,oc \r9lF n yVi\ cn~~\~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUN7ERWroaI Study Parti docPage 8 "'/ ~ ~~ Rev. 3/17/04 ATTACHMENT"A" ~~ l..J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multl-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional , InstltutlonaVGovernment Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gaUday/unit (tenant) 4082 gaUday/unit (tenant) 973 gaUday/unit (tenant) 6412 gaUday/unit (tenant) 1750 gaUday/umt (tenant) 2020 gaUday/urnt (tenant) 1863 gaUday/urnt (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre InstltutlonaVGovernment 3000 gaUday/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gaUday/acre Source Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERVniUal Study Parlt docPaga 9 "'Y Rev 3/17/04 AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES SHEET 1 OF 5 TENTATIVE TRACT 169'71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Photo Looking East Along Northerly Property Lme Photo Looking Southerly From Northerly Property Line LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Planners 14125 Telephone Avenue, Suite 1 Ch A 91710 Tel (909) 548-Fax (909) 548-6841 AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT 16971 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ G Photo Looking West Along Northerly Property L(ne Photo Looking North Along Easterly Property Line I"'1 L.J SHEET 2 OF 5 LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES Consulring Engneers and Planners 14125 Telephone Avenue, Suite 1 Chino CA 91710 Tel (909) 548-6418 Fax (909) 548-6841 AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT 16971 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ Photo Looking Easterly Into The Hawthornes Old Post Dnve SHEET 3 OF 5 Photo Looking Easterly Into The Hawthornes From Hellman Avenue I_ LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Planners 14125 Teleph e Avenue, Suite 1 Chi 91710 Tel (909) 548-6 ax (909) 548-6841 AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT 16971 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n Photos Looking Easterly Into The Hawthornes From Hellman Avenue LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Planners 14125 Telephone Avenue, Surte 1 Chino CA 91710 Tel (909) 548-6418 Fax (909) 548-6841 SHEET 4 OF 5 AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES TENTATIVE TRACT 16971 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA R Q~ °Q Photo Looking Easterly Into The Hawthornes From Hellman Avenue SHEET 5 OF 5 Photo Looking North - Hellman Avenue LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers and Planners 14125 Teleph a Avenue, Suite 1 Chi 91710 Tel (909) 548-6 ax (909) 548-6841 i City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Fde• Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16971 2. Related Files Variance DRC2004-01163, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885 3 Description of Protect TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES - A request to subdivide 3 2 net acres of land into 19 single family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 0210-062-39 The related Variance application is for reductions in lot standards because of the awkward triangular shape of the property 4 Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: American Pacific Homes, 4959 Palo Verde Street, Suite B-110, Montclair, Calif 91763 5 General Plan Designation Low-Medum Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6 Zoning Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the protect's surroundings) The protect site is vacant land easterly and adjacent to Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek The property to the east is single family residential development, to the north is vacant 10 8 acres approved for residential development of 47 units, to the west is single-family residential development, and, to the south is the Cucamonga Creek flood control channel and light industrial in the City of Ontario 8. Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number. Vance Pomeroy (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model C-~ L1 a-~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise () Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () TransportationlTraffic () Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An EIR is requred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant rlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, mciudmg revisions or mitigation measures that are im sed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared By Date _,/h'~-~~/~~'~ Reviewed By 1~~~/~--~- Date 2 /~~~~ r1 ~J ~, ~ 30 • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Tun Sipnlfionl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PolenWlly SipnM1mnt w,m Mmp°eon Than Sigmfipnl No I p In led I h I h EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located in the low-medium residential district and is characterized by single- family residential development to the north and east, single-family residential development to the west, and industrial development, in the City of Ontario, to the south The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new udhty fines and facilities to minim¢e unsightly appearance of overhead utildy fines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant C~ 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Pnme Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) ConFlict with existing zoning for agnculturai use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses C, J~ ~ I Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Thin Si9mfipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Poin1i°Y Sgrvfiom ""'" MmQdban T"a" Signifigm No I C In teE 1 C 1 p Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The ma/or concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan for Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed pro/ect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about 1/3 is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The site is not located within this area However, the General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) ConFlict wdh or obstruct implementation of the O O O (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or pro/ected air quality wolation~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the pro/ect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () () concentrations e) Create ob/ectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people • C, D 3a- ~J Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Tian Sigmfiranl Less Issues and Su ortn InformaLon Sources PP g Polen4ally Significant Wln MNgaYOn Than Significant No 1 cl Inco tee 1 C I cl Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area, and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a prolect- specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads ~,~ ~~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less 7nan 5,9n~fitanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polenliallr 5,9rvfignt win Mmphon Than 5,9,uficznt No I cl In letl I h I cl • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of the year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 611 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level-less-than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters ny~ ~~7' Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Signifipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Patenfially Signifionl won Mrtigafion roan Significant No I act Inco tetl I atl I act 11) Ali residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated ~~ f•J d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor single-family residences to the east and west Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or O O O (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means ~,~ ~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Sigmfiranl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sigmfiwnl Wlh Mi6gaYOn Than Sgnifinnt No I C Inco teC I atl 1 ad d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () (/) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict wdh the provisions of an adopted Habdat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments. a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) c) d) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated Of the 14 trees on the property, 11 qualify as heritage trees The applicant has submitted Tree Removal Permit application DRC2004-00885 to remove all trees on the property An arborist report was prepared by Ted Elder (arborist certificate #2301) who concluded that "none of the trees are individually outstanding or unique and can be replaced with trees that would be required for the development where expectation for a successful outcome could be assured " The arborists' findings are summarized below Tree Species HealthlCondition Arborist Recommendation 1 Magnolia grandiflora Good/stripped of Remove (Southern Magnolia) branches on one side 2 Sequoia sempervirens Distressed/ dead Remove - Not a good candidate (Coast Redwood) wood for transplanting 3 Sequoia sempervirens Distressed/ dead Remove (Coast Redwood) wood (significant dieback) ~,~~~ C~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less rnan Sigmfirant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PolenOally Sgmficant Wtn Mi0ga0on rnan Sigmfipnt No I atl Inco ateE I d I d 4 Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Red Gum) Good Remove -not significant 5 Ligustrum lucidum (Glossy Privet) Good Protect in place or replace 6 Eucalyptus Dead Remove 7 Ligustrum lucidum (Glossy Privet) Good Protect in place or replace 8 Eucalyptus _ Good Remove -not signfcant 9 Dead Remove 10 Eucalyptus Good Remove -not significant 11 Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Gum) Good Remove -Non heritage tree (too small) 12 Schinus molle (Pepper) Good Protect in place or replace 13 Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) Good Protect in place, transplant or replace 14 Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) Good Protect in place, transplant or replace The following mitigation measure shall be implemented The 11 heritage trees shall be removed and replaced within the protect boundaries on a 1 1 ratio with the largest nursery grown trees available to the satisfaction of the City Planner The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ ~~~~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Sigmfiwnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polenbally Sigmfignl Wnh Mingabon Than Sgmficanl No I act Inca waleC I d I acl c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O O (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented u 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider estabhshmg provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-Influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented C,a ~~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less man Sgmfirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PotenWity Sigrufignt wiVt MingaOOn man Signfipnt No ~ ^ In tea ~ C ~ h 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) ui) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) hquefaction~ iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property C~ (~v 1 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Sigrufipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PolenLally Signifipnl Wih MNgaLOn Than 9gn,fionl No 1 h Inca IM Irtnacl I [t e) Have soils Incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site and it Is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is It In the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red HIII Fault, passes within 1 6 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 7 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M,„ 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault Is capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes and the San Andreas Is capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are les s-than-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area Is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the Impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be Implemented to reduce Impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM,g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) Indicates that subsidence Is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site Is not within a geotechnlcal hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soll types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of Bolls are not considered to be expansive Soll types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse Impacts are anticipated C, A ~ • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less rnan Significant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Polenfially Sigmfipnt WM Mioga4on Than Signifiom No I an Inco ordteE I atl I tl e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed i 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routme transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect wdhin the wcindy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments. a) The prolect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The Cdy participates m a countywide interagency coahfion that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division which is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste wdl reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level les- than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates m a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service C,A ~1 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Tnan Signifipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Polmhaliy $ignrfinnl win Miogaoon roan signifipnr No ~ n In ~eE ~ an ~ d Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergenaes Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mde of the prolect site The prolect site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school d) The proposed prolect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Gty's westerly hmds No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster Because the prolect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-dnven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the prolect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () () () (/) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site r~ LJ C~'D ~a ~~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Tian SiBnifimnt Las Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Patentalty SiBmfimN Wlh MNgaOOn Tian S,yufipnt No 1 p Into ted I cl I d d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year Flood hazard area as () (/) () ( ) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year Flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () (/) () ( ) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction actvtes, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertorm inspections of all BMPs C, ~ ~P3 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 leu Than Signifipnt feu Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Pmb^wllr Signfifam wen Mnigabon Thaa Signifinnl No I n Inw teE I n I Lti Waste discharges include discharges of stone water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by (Chuck Lockman of Lockman 8 Associates/8-16-04), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-sde to reduce pollutants during construction acbvrties entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (prepared by Chuck Lockman of Lockman & Associates, August 16, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. C~.~ p ~~P Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 less Tian Srgnificanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PolenUaily s~en~firam win A449eUan man Sigmfirant No I C In led I C I C 6) Landscaping Plans shall Include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpesticideslherbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, Including monitoring provlslons for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the Clty for review and approval prior to the Issuance of grading permits b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require grading of the site and excavation, however, it would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the Flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the Flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in Flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented ~, ~ ~~- Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Signifinnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenUally $,gmfiwnt Wlh MNgabon Than S,gnifinnt No I C Into tea 1 n 1 p 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a prolect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g/h/i) The pro/ect site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage Flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The following mitigations shall be implemented 9) The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an un-shaded zone "X" designation for the protect area The developer's engineer shall prepare all the necessary reports, plans and hydrologiclhydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) prior to approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 10) If FEMA is unwilling to revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), elevation certificates shall be provided for lots within the tract. 11) A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12) Include design of supplemental interim flood protection measures along Hellman Avenue and/or determine safe finished floor elevations for all lots within 100-year flood zone 13) All catch basins and on site local storm drain systems shall be Qioo• ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the pro/ect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow 1 ~~ \ / W Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Ttun $,gnifipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polenually Sigmfipnt WM M,figaOOn Tnan Signifiranl No I n Inco IeE I cl 1 ad Impacts to the level of non-signficance within the City Thls existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the Clty, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically dmde an established commurnty~ O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limped to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mdigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is located at Hellman Avenue south of 6th Street and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east with single-family residential and industrial development in the City of Ontario to the west This prolect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the east The prolect well become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is single family residential The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticpated c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural Community Plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact C, ~ ~7 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Tian Sigruf~ranl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Polen~ially Sipmfinnt wu, MNgaOOn roan Sipnfiont No ~ d In teE ~ h ~ C 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agenaes~ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise O O O (/) levels in the prolect vianity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () (/) () ( ) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise Ievels~ f) For a prolect wdhin the viandy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The prolect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out The proposed single-family residential lots would not generate unusually high noise, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment will generate nose exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speufied in Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Department Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above nose standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase. r Or C, ~ C.}~b C r 1 ~ J Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Sipnifimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp 9 Potentially Sipnifirant wnn Milipaeon man Sipnifiranl No I cl In atetl I C 1 h b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a)response above The preceding mitigation measure will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 1 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O O (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated C, ~ ~-(~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than SiBnifimnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potenoany SiBnifirant win Mm~YOn man Sigmfiwm No 1 n Into tea ~ ct ~ n 13. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the pro/ect result rn substanhal adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Fire protechon~ O O O (/) b) Police protechon~ O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public faci6bes~ O O O (/) Comments a) The site, located Hellman Avenue south of 6th Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 2 6 miles from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities, or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Budding and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled, as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/4 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new faalities, or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticpated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities, or alteration of any existing faalities, or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for ~~ ~ so Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources PP g PolenOally Sigmfipnt WM MNga4on man Sigmfirant No I act Inc ordtetl I cl I h which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faclit~es such that substantial physical deterioration of the faality would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 1/4 mile from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an mcrease in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will requre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above • 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project a) Cause an increase m traffic, which is substantial m O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i e , result in a substantial mcrease in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at mtersectons)? b) Exceed, either mdiwdually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result m inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result m inadequate parking capaaty~ O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted polices, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) C, fJ S-I Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Tnan Signifimnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 PatenOally Sigmfinnt wtn Mtligahan man Significant No I ci Inm tetl I cl I ct Comments. a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the prolect design The prolect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect will generate 4 0 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 1 1/2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or farming uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will be designed to prowde access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with the standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The prolect design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the prolect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construdtion of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects Cl ~ ~~- C~ Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Signifinnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgnfinlnt MNgal4on Si mfirant No 1 d Inm tea I d 1 tl c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in adddion to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments. a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant, located within Rancho Cucamonga, and RP-1, located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anhapated e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant, located within Rancho Cucamonga, and RP-1, located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill, with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs C~ .~ ~3 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Tian Signifipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potenhalry Sigmfi~anl WiN MNgaOon man Significant No I C In IeE I ci I ad g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are antiapated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speces, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are indiv~duaily () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that wdl be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required f`.J CJ ~ 5~ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16971 Page 27 c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) ~~~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16971 Page 28 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signific ielaiter<s would occur ~~ ,/~~i Applicant's Signature ~ Date '~/~`r ~ ~S -~ Pnnt Name and Title Sn= ~~--`- Ta /-~U ~ G.=` k L/, /? • C, ~ 5 n U City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaratron is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Project File No.: Tentatrve Tract Map SUBTT16971 Public Review Period Closes: March 23, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: American Pacific Homes Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the east side of Heilman Avenue, south of 6th Street - APN 0210-062-39 Project Description: A request to subdivide 3.2 net acres of land into 19single-family lots in the Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study idenhfied potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a sigrnficant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period March 23 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By Ct~ 5~ RESOLUTION NO 05-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16971, AN 18 LOT SUBDIVISION OF 4 35 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN• 0210-062-39. A Recitals 1 American Pacific Homes filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16971, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street, with a street frontage of 315 feet and lot depth of approximately 1,247 feet, and is presently vacant; and b The property to the north of the subtect site is vacant with approved Tentative Tract SUBTT16311, the property to the south consists of single-family residential, the propertyto the east is single-family residential, and the property to the west is open space flood conUol, and c The development ~s proposed to include the development of one single-family residence on each lot, an emergency access way and gate on Lot 8 onto Old Post Dnve, and access to the proposed MuIU-use Regional Trail, and d. All parking and circulation requirements are met. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. C~~ 5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 2 a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans with the exceptions of the Vanances for wall height and lot depth granted under separate resolution, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and c The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative tract is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f. The design of the tentative Vact will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and mfonnation contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mondonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mforrnaUon provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference C, ~ 5~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 3 Planning Department 1) Approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16971 is granted subject to the approval of Vanance DRC2004-01163 for lot depth, and Minor Exception DRC2005-00189 for all walls exceeding 6 feet, but less than 8 feet, in height 2) All perimeterwalls shall be no less than 6 feet high, including along the street between Lots 6 and 7. All such walls shall match those penmeter walls of the abutting development to the east, Tentative Tract SUBTT15727, in color and matenals subtect to review by the City Planner. 3) Access and a gate for such access shall be provided between Lot 6 and Lot 7 for the regional trail identified on the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan (General Plan Exhibit III-13). 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00885 is hereby approved subject to the mitigation measures (Biology) contained herein below. Enomeenna Department 1) Development is responsible for frontage improvements to Hellman Avenue from the north project boundary to the City limits, within Cucamonga Creek Channel. 2) In lieu of installing the Master Plan Storm Drain Line IV-2 in Hellman Avenue, development is required to install floodwalls, on both sides of Hellman Avenue south of 6th Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 3) A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. a) Include design of supplemental intenm flood protection measure along Hellman Avenue and/or determine safe finished floor elevations for all lots within the 100-year flood zone. b) All catch basins and on-site local stone drain systems shall be Q~~. 4) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone A designation removed from the project • a) The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an un-shaded zone "X" designation for the project area The developers engineer shall prepare all c, ~ ~v PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 4 . the necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) pnor to approval of the final map orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. b) If FEMA is unwilling to revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), elevation certificetes shall be provided for lots within the flood zone. 5) Hellman Avenue frontage shall be improved in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial"standards including a c pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, and access ramps as follows: a) Reconstruct Hellman Avenue pavement, including west of the centerline, to current City standards Provide a tilt section and install sufficient improvements on the west side to keep O,oo within the nght-of-way. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of Hellman Avenue reconstruction and improvements, west of the centerline, from future development (redevelopment) as itoccurs onthe west side • of Hellman Avenue. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. b) If a floodwall is required on the east side, sidewalk shall be curb adjacent with the floodwall at the back of the sidewalk. All Landscape Maintenance Distnct (LMD) landscaping shall be above O,ao water surface. c) If this tract develops before Tentative Tract SUBTT16311, Hellman Avenue improvements shall be extended to 6th Street to contain O,oo, orflood walls shall be provided along the north tract boundary. 6) Street "D" shall be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including a.c. pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, traffic signs and sthping. a) Cul~e-sac shall conform to City Standards. b) The street shall be based upon a straight grade crossfall of 1.70 percent per City Standards 7) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on • the protect side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of the southerly project boundary to the first pole C-~~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 5 north of the north protect boundary street, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichevercomes first. All services crossing Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same Ume. The developer may request reimbursement agreement to recoverone-half the City adopted amount for undergrounding from future devebpment (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall tertrnnate. 8) Reconstruct Old Post Drive to a reduced radws tum around per City Standard No 113, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Wntten approval shall be obtained from Hawthomes Homeowners' Association (HOA) pnor to the approval of the Final Tract Map 16971. 9) Obtain from Rancho Cucamonga Fire Disthct comments regarding the width, surface matenal specifications, and others of the emergency access easement on Lot 9. 10) In reference to San Bernardino County Flood Control Distnct (SBCFCD) comments dated October 13, 2004, the development shall incorporate the most recent FEMA flood proofing regulations Establish adequate provisions for intercepting and conducting drainage around or through the site in a manner that wdl not adversely affect adiacent or downstream properties A complete drainage analysis, including hydrologic/hydraulics calculations wdl be regwred. Otheron- site or off-site improvements may be regwred upon determination of the analysis 11) U S Army Corps of Engineers' approval may be required for work within Cucamonga Channel in addition to SBCFCD permt. Information can be obtained from the SBCFCD's Operation Division, Permit Section 12) The WOMP that was onginally submitted is inadequate. Submit a Water Quality Management Plan thatfollows curent WOMP templates /guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for New Development and Redevelopment Projects: http.//www.swrcb ca.gov/nvgcb8/htmUsb wgmp.hVnl This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and punted Adhere to these gwdelines and use the templates provided. Also, include the BMPs identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check. 13) To provide access to this development, the developer shall construct Street "A," "C," and "D" of Tentative Tract 16311, north of this development. Tentative Tract SUBTT16311 shall be recorded before C ~ J) (o a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 6 the Final Tract Map 16971 is scheduled for City Counal approval or easements for those streets shall be obtained from the property owner. Environmental MiUaation Air Qualdy 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speaficaUons Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading pemtds, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low mission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any constuction measures imposed bythe South CoastAir Quality Management Disthct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of Ume. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the Ume of year of construction n/ I\ / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 7 Suspend gradmg operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdivng agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactnre for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction gradmg plans include a statement that work crews will shutoffegwpmentwhen not m use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnppmg Biological Resources 1) The 11 hentage trees shall be removed and replaced within the protect boundanes on a 1 1 ratio with the largest nursery grown trees available to the satisfaction of the City Planner Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng gradmg, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actiwties, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will. Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Ct~ ~O'7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 8 • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeual qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bemard~no County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~ ..I 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological mondonng) that may be appropnate. Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing actiwUes Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actiwUes elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soy/s 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabdmng agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. C, ~ ~O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 9 3) Grading operations shall be 25 mph to minimize PM,o episodes suspended when wind speeds exceed emissions from the site dunng such 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the pernit applicant shall submit to the Building Offiaal for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the Ume of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum• a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy penods expenenced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified Ume frame 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns orsedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to stone events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (prepared by Chuck Lockman of Lockman & Associates, August 16, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimmng the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, . including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits C~~ ~(~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 10 7) Pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect descnpUon and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Pnorto issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. CJ 9) The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an un-shaded zone "X" designation for the protect area The developer's engineer shall prepare all the necessary reports, plans and hydrologic hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) prior to approval of the final map or the issuance of bwldmg permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 10) If FEMA is unwilling to revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), elevation certificates shall be provided for lots within the tract 11) A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 12) Include design of supplemental intenm flood protection measures along Hellman Avenue and/or determine safe finished floor elevations for all lots within 100-year flood zone 13) All catch basins and on site local storm dram systems shall be Q~ao• Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday C, D (~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-18 SUBTT16971 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 11 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be required by the Planning Department Said consultant shall reporttheirfindings tothe Planning Department within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Macias, Chaimtan Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS. CJ C.J ~ g City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16971 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed prolect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The prolect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the prolect file with the department having the original authority for processing the prolect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 981730 C~V ~-l Mitgation Monitoring Program SUBTT16971 . Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requued for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9. In those instances requinng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits u C,D-l~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Protect File No.: Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT76971 Applicant: American Pacific Homes Initial Study Prepared by: _ Vance Pomeroy. Contract Planner Date: February 3, 2005 •. ~. ;~ t~1ir;„~1ual;'Y,~r. ~s~,>`:~.f. 9 ~~ 'y,, t .vs„t^.~~s~i.4v . 1 Q - ; a~ ~ i ,~i ~. x .~ a ~, f"f4a~~a , ~'~ ~a ~ ~~' ~` ~y~ ~~ s.Y ~i Yi ~ ~'~y AV ti~+~ -01 Mk~ ~ [qC "~,~`~ ~i~~~' All constructan egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating conddan so as to reduce operatxxral emissxxrs The contractor shall ensure that all consWctron equipment ~s being properly servxxd and maintained as per manufacturers' speaficatxxts Maintenance records shall be available at the constivction site for Cdy venfx:atron Prior to the issuance of any Grading Pertnds, the developer CP/BO C Revew of plans C 2 shall submd constriction plans to Cdy denoting the proposed sdiedule and prgeded equipment use Corutrix3ion contractors shall provide evderxe that bw emissxxi mobile oonsiruction equipment will be util¢ed, or that their use was investxlated and found to be infeasble for the prged Contractors shall also conform to anyconstnic4on measures rtnposed by the South Coast Arc Qualdy Management Dstrrct (SCAOMD) as well as Cdy Planning Sfaff All paints and coatings shall meet ar exoed performance CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and ooatirgs shall beapplied either byhand ar hgh-volume, bw-pressure spray All asphaR shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted m SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shag oompywdh SCAOMD Rules BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 402 and 403 Addrtarally, contractors shall include the fdlowing provisxxu • Reestablish ground cover on the construction sde BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-sde haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time _~ G J • ~$ • .. . .. . . . . .. . -. .. • Schedule activities to mrmmrze the amounts of BO C Revrewdplans AIC 2J4 exposed excavated soli dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Revrewdplens A 4 accordance wrth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C Dunng A 4 by the City if silt is cerried over to adjacent public oonstrudxxt thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construdion SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated wrCi water or other sot-stabdmng BO C Dunng A 4 agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regxx>al Water Quality construction Contrd Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Partiwlate I Matter(PM,o)emissions.InaocordarroewrthSCAOMDRuIe 403 Chemicel sot-stabd¢ers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive oonstructron areas construction that remain inadrve for 95 hours or more to reduce PMio emissxxis The construction contractor shall utilme elednc or dean CE C Rewewdplans A/C 4 attemaWe fuel-powered equq~ment where feasble The construction contractor shall ensure that construction CE C Review d plans AIC 2/4 Grading Plans indude a statement that work news vwll shut off equipment when not m use All residential and oommeraal stnrctimes shall be requrced to BO C/D Review d plans C 2/4 incorporate hgh-efficrerxyAow-poluhng heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All resxleritial and oommerdal structures shall be required to BO C/D Review d plans C 2/4 incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stopping r. c 2of8 ~~ C'i I ~ . - ~. . .. .'Biotogigat Resources ~ ~ -' ~ -~? ~ `~` - - ~~ ~ , , .:--~: - a ' ~ iS.u f .- Cny J The 11 heritage trees shall be removed and replaced wilhin CP B/C!D Review of plans A 2/314 the prged bourxlaries on a 1 1 rata wilh the largest nursery grown trees available to the sahsfar,~4on of the Cdy Planner fvnn,rt Af ~ n ? =F~' nry~ .et .iryr, r~.w Cultural Resources~aa . , ~ ' ~" ;~ .,,, :`;i~' B Fy/~y.:4 ~~i^ti, w g, .rr ~i..~"',` r ~..~ +w M' „~.. -,.•. g n> hta`n*'w xr ..,, ~ az,~^~:: k^, b`N v'l ft+ s, Jxa "~ cr+ n L• ,.~' ~ ~,~.r, .e Rita sa. ;~ ~ ., : xr. , 1F \ r,~. i! w.hr 2;S' .aaxYr k~xx.: WT M.' "4 3, Nv„1' ~~ i ff any preh~stonc ardwedogigl resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monRor consWdion admties, to take appropriate measures to prated or preserve them for study W ilh the assistance of the ardraeolog~st, the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga vhll Enact interm measures to prated undesgnated sites from CPBO C Review of report AID 3/4 demdilan or sgnificant modficatan wilhout an opportunity for the CAy to establish ils archaedogical value Consider esfablrhing provisans to require inoorpora6on of CPBO C Review of report AID 3/4 ardiaedogicel sAes wilhin new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's arohaedogical CPBO C Review of report AID 3/4 Propose mitgatan measures and recommend conditions of CPBO C Review of report AiD 3l4 I approval to eliminate adverse project effects on sgnficant, unportant, and unpue prehistoric resources, fdlawing appropnaate CEOA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report ArD 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluatron, and proposed mitgatan of resources wilhin the prged area Submit one Dopy of the completed report, wAh original llustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaedogicel Informatan Center for permanent archiving A qualfied paleontobgist shall conduct a precorulnic4ori field CP B Review of report AID 4 survey of the protect site The paleontdogist shall submd a report of findings that w~l also provide specfic reoommendatans regandug furtlier milgahon measures (i e , paleontological mon'dcxvig) that may be appropriate Where mingatan mondoring s appropriate, the program must inducts, but rat be limned to, the fdlowing measures ~f 8 _n ~J • i • ... . .... ... .. ... .. . Assgn a paleontdogxal monRor, framed and equipped to CP B Review of report AID 4 allow the rapid removal of fossils wdh minimal construction delay, to Cie sde full -time dunng the interval of earth- d~sturbmg a Should fossils be found wdhin an area being cleared or BO &C Review of report AID 4 graded, divert earth-d~sturbmg admhes elsewhere unftl the monrtar has completed saMage C construction personnel make Cre discovery, Cre grading oontrador shook! immediately dniert axrstrucian and nobly Cre monitor of Cre fi~ SubmrtasummaryrepattoCreCAyofRandroCugnrorxta CP D Rewewofreport D 3 Transfer collected speamens wdh a Dopy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum ~~ '3 ~~ , : , d ` ~ '' ~ " ~ ' S i ~~w ' ~ n ~t `1C ' ~. ~, • ~" W-0 ~ .., ~ < i= , S: , x ~d +. i kM .a~'+n:a :x ~ '.a fy y' " .p~, ' q r t . ,. ~;,:1 ~.a~u ~;.~ , v + '"~u8',dm~ The sRe shall be treated wdh water or other sal-stablmng BO C Dunng A 4 agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) dailyto reduce consWdan PM10 emissiars, m accordance wdh SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng A 4 schedule established bythe CAyto reduce PM10 emissxxrs construction assoaated wdh vehicle tracking of soil off-sde Timing may vary depending upon Cre time of year of construction Grading operatwns shall be suspended when Hnnd speeds BO C Dunng A 4 exceed 25 mph to minim¢e PM10 emissxms from the site axutrucian dunng such episodes Chemxxl sal-stabil¢ers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas constructiar that remain mactrve for 96 hours a more to reduce PM10 em~ssrons _~ Quality~~ ~'<, _~~ '.~ Hydrology andWate~ ~ ~~ ,.~U: - ~.., _ ,`_ - ~r,~,., , , , ~ Pnor m issuance d Grading Pennds, Cie permit applx~nt BO B/CID 12ewew of plans AIC 2/4 shall submR Cie to Budding Offiaal for approval, a Storm Water Pdlutxm Preventron Plan (SWPPP) specficaly dentdying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used orrsde to reduce polutarris dunng constriction adrvi6es entenng Cie slam dram system to the mawmum extent pradrral 4of8 ~~ ~l J .• -• .. An erosan contrd plan shall be prepared. rcrduded in the BO &CID Review of plans AIC 2l4 Grading Plan, and anplemented for the proposed protec that identifies speafic measures to control orr-sde and oft-sde erosxxr from the trine of ground disturbing adiwtres are inrMated through completxxr of grading This Erosxxr Confrd Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafythe trming of grading and oorutructron to minimm: sal exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern Caldania, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur edher on-sde or off-sde as a resuR of this protect will be corrected through a remed~atxxr or restoratxxr program wdhin a speafied time frame During construcion, temporary berms such as sandbags or BO &GD Review of plans & AIC 2/4 gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris a• during sediment from Uie sde when there ks rainfall a• other runoff ppriS~tpn During oautrix~an, to remove polutants, street dearnng wdl BO B/C/D Review of plans 8 AIC 2/4 be performed prxx to storm events and after the use of water during trucks to conird dust m order to prevent discharge of debris consWdxxr or sediment from the sde The developer shall rcnplement the BMPs xlentrfied in the CE B/GD Review of plans AIC 2/4 Water Qualdy Management Plan (prepared by Chuck Lodvnan of Lockman & Assoaates, August 16, 2004) to reduce polutants after oonstructan entering the storm dram system to the mawmum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisans for contrdling and BO B/GD Review of plans AIC 2/4 minrcmm~g the use of ferUlm:rslpestradesRrerbK~ Landscaped areas shall be mondored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including mondonng provisans for a minimum of two years, stroll be submitted to the Cdy for review and approval pray to the issuance of 9~irs3 pennds ~f 8 ~ .. . .. Prior to issuance of Budding Pennrls, the applicent shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 submit to the Cdy Engineer for approval of a Water Oualtty Management Plan (WOMP), including a prgect desrnptan and identifrng Best Management Practices (BMPs) that vv~ll be used on-sde to reduce polutanis into the storm dram system to the mawmum extent pracfKable The WQMP shall identify the structirral and non-stnx~irel measures rnorustent wdh the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the CRy of Rar>cho Cucamonga in June 2004 Poor to issuance of Grading or Paving Pennds, applicant CE B/C1D Review of plans AIC 2l4 shall obtain a Notwe of Intent (NOI) to comply wdh obtaining coverage under the Natanal Pdlutant Discharge Eliminatan System (NPDES) General Constnictan Storm WaterPennrt from the State Water Resources Contrd Board Evidence that this has been obtained (r e , a copy of the Waste Dxcharger's Identrficetan Number) shall be submitted to the CAy BuBding Offiaal for ooverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit The developer shall provide drainage anrllor flood protection CE B/GD Review of plans A!C 2/4 7 faalNes sufficient to obtain an un-shaded none "X" ,f desgnation for the prged area The developers engineer ~ shall prepare all the necessary reports, plans and hydrdog~/hydrauhccelculatrons ACondrtionalLetterofMap Revisan (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) poor to approval of the final map or the issuance of budding permits, whichever aocurs first A Letter of Map Reviswn (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA poor to accuparxy or anprovement aoceptarrce, whichever occurs first ff FEMA s urnvdhng to revise the Flood Insurance Rate Map CE B/GD Review of plans AIC Z4 (FIRM), elevatxxr certificates shall be provided for lots wdhrn the tract A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by CE B/GD Review of plans AIC 2/4 the City Engineer prix to final map approval or the ssuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalRies shall be installed as required by the Cdy Engineer 6of8 `~ N •. .. Include desgn of supplemental interim flood protedan CE B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 measures along Hellman Avenue ardlor detemtme safe fleshed floor elevatans for all bis wdhin 100-year flood none All catch basins and on site locel stone dram systems shall CE B/C1D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 be 0100 1{~~. Y ^~ ~4 y~ ~?.~K-~ 1•elJa ~ > ~; • ) ~~ e ~~` `~ '[~y~M+~ r~~ ~ ~~? ~ ~Y'~~~p~'j~y~A " ~ I ~ ~{~ ~ j+~ry j`fj~ ~[T~~~ ' ~ 'jS`~~~~` ` i .h, f! /4 a 1' y `P ) ~,~~, A"/A '+?^ h 'YN- r ` G• J , <`~L, .~.Sw~.ti iL'^" ` 4~~. ~ ~byT~wi~, 1~ 'tiWl. ~. X -r wi •I Construdan or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including construction Satuniay, or at any time on Sunday or a notarial hdday , Constructan or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A q standards speafied m Development Code Sedan construction 1702 120-0, as measured at the property line The devebper shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level mondonng as speafied in Development Code Sedan 17 OZ 120 Mondonng at other times may be required by the Budding Offiaal Sad consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Offiaal wdhin 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall irtrmed~atelyno~~ylheBuldmgOffxoal ffnoiselevelsexceed tloe above standards, then constivdan adrvdres shall Ue reduced m intensely to a level of compliance wdh above nose standards or halted The perimeter blade wall shall be constructed as early as CP C During A A possible m the first phase canstrudan Haul teak dehverres shall rat take place between the hours POBO C Dunng A 4l7 of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saluniay, construction oratanytrmeonSundayoranatiomalhdday Addrtanally,d heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tops (counting both to and from the construdan srte), then the developer shall prepare a Nose Mltgatan Plan denoting any construction iraific haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do rat pass sensdrve land uses or resdent>al dwellings ~f $ • Key to Checklist Abbreviations CDD -Community Development Director a designee A - Wrth Each New Development A - On-srte Inspection 1 - W ifhhold Recordatlon of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pdor To ConslnlWOn 8 - Other Agenry Permit /Approval 2 - WiMhold Grading or Building Pennft CE -City Engineer a designee C - Thmughoul ConstruWon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold CeNficate of Oaupanq BO - Building Olfidal M designee D - On Completbn D -Separate Submittal (Reporle/Studbal Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO - Pdloe Captain or designee E - Operatlng 5 -Retain Deposit a Bonds FC - Flre Chiei or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 1 ~ G oQ 8of8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENy STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16971 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION FOR 18SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES, INC LOCATION: HELLMAN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: a B C. General Requirements ComoleGOn Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, tts _/_/~ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole dtscretton, partiapate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No 16971 is granted sub/ect to the approval of Variance _/_I_ DRC2004-01163 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-18, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading acbvities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which inGude _/_/_ site plans, archdectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations ~C/~ ~Q Protect No SUBTT16971 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonrywalls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 8 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of budding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) D. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a SitelPlot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (SUBTT16971) cleady identified on the outside of all plans / / -/-/- / I / I / / -/- - / / / / z C~ a ~(~ Protect No SUBTT16971 Comolehon Date E. F G. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal ' Compensation coverage to 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers _/_/ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_I_ 5 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _I_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (SUBTT16971) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations rn effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential pro/ect or ma/or addition, the applicant _I_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department pnor to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays ~ New Structures 1 Provide compliance wdh the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _I_I_ Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _I_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permds 3 CJ~ ~( Protect No SUBTT76977 Comolehon Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for • existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage faalities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans andlor tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on Hellman Avenue 30 total feet on Street "D" (both sides) 3 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 4 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and tf he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an • agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decdes to acquire the off-site property interests regwred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Streets "A." "C" and "D" of Tract 16311 Street Improvements All pubitc improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limned to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Counctl Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buldings, or units proportionate to the completton of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completton and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development / / / / I I / / / / / / -/_ . -/- - -/-/- 4 C~d~ g~ Protect No SUBTT16971 Completion Date Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trad Other Hellman Avenue X X X X X (e) Street "D" X X X X X X Notes (a) Medlan Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Flood walls Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engmeer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction pro/ect along ma/or or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engmeer f Existmg City roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program / / -/- - -/-/- -/- - -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- / / I / -/- - 5 C, ~ 83 Protect No SU8TT16971 Completion Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size Qty Hellman Avenue Gegera parviflora Australian Willow 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in "D" Street Select appropriate tree from approved street tree list for Rancho Cucmonga Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sods report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient dehcienaes may requue backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only J. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and urigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance . of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Distract Hellman Avenue 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City K. Drainage and Flood Control The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Ctty Engineer It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or Flood protection facilities suffiaent to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer -/_/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- /_/, -/- - -/-/- /_/. s CJ ~ ~~ Protect No SU8TT16971 Completion Date 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from ad/scent areas 5 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its _/_/~ right-of-way L. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _I_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _I_I_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the _I_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or poor to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them M. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building ~ permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 7 C~ ~ O.y ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS November 2, 2004 Cook Properties SFR Sub-division SUTT16971 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways n At intersectwns ni On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distrct v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for your project will be established when the size of the structures are provided. 1 This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Fire protection water plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to their site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. C~ ~ 0 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. • 5 A lack of fire flow will require the buildings to be sprmklered. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal must rewew and approve plans with all the detatls for the regwred emergency access road at the end of the cut-de- sac The plans must be submitted as a part of the alternative method application for approval, a fee of$ 92 00 is regwred The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee The design of the emergency access must be in accordance to RCFPD Standard 9-7 Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the pro/ect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services U 2 C-j ~ $ 1 3 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with . minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be wsible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry i ~, D g ~ RESOLUTION NO 05-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004-01163 TO ALLOW THE LOT DEPTH FOR LOTS 6 AND 8 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16971 TO BE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM 90 FEET IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0210-062-39 A Recitals. 1 Amencan Pacific Homes filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DRC2004-01163, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Vanance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recdals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows: a The protect exceeds all development standards for the Low-Medwm Residential zone except for lot depth and the wall height, and b. The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on December 8, 2004, where the attendees expressed general satisfaction, and c. The exUeme aspect of the shape of the protect sde precludes reasonable development of the entire site, and d. The lots with lot depths less than 90 feet have one side property Ime that exceeds 90 feet in length and retain a buildable area for residential improvement similar to the other lots in this tract and m this area. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: C t ~ ~Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-19 DRC2004-01163 -AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 2 a. That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances orconditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract. c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprave the applicant of pnwleges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract. d. That the granting of the Vanance wdl not constitute a grant of speaal pnwlege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same d~sthct. e That the granting of the Vanance will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity. 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Gwdelmes. CJ 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, ds agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at ds sole discretion, parUapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Macias, Chairanan u ~~ ~ /a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-19 DRC2004-01163-AMERICAN PACIFIC HOMES March 23, 2005 Page 3 J ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. C~~ ~` L~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 23, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01176 - T-MOBILE, WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY AND CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - A request to replace an existing 100-foot high lattice antenna with a 106-foot high monopine wireless facility in the Very Low Residential District ( 1-2 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 5765 Etiwanda Avenue - APN• 0225-122-12 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facddies) PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning• North - VacanULow Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan South - Cucamonga Valley Water District Treatment Facility and Vacant/Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct Treatment Facility and Vacant Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre); Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family ResidentialNery Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units Etiwanda Specific Plan B General Plan Designations Project Site -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) /Very Low per acre); Item "E" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01176 -T-MOBILE/WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY, AND CVWD • March 23, 2005 Page 2 C Site Characteristics The project site is located at the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) treatment facility at 5765 Etiwanda Avenue (south side of future Wilson Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue) There is an existing 100-foot high lattice antenna presently located 110 feet east of the proposed monopine. The proposed monopme is located over 350 feet from the nearest residence ANALYSIS. A General The applicant is proposing to remove an existing 100-foot high lattice antenna tower and replace it with a 106-foot high monopme "stealth" design A monopine is a single pole disgwsed as a pine tree The proposed monopine, at 106 feet m height, exceeds the height limits of the Very Low Residential District (35 feet), and is classified as a Ma1or Wireless Communication Facility Ma1or Wireless Communication Faalities are not permitted within residential districts unless the proposed faality replaces an existing faality for purposes of a co-location The proposed monopine will provide three antennas for the CVWD, two antennas for the West End Communications Authority, one antenna for Cmgular Wireless, and an opportunity for a future cellular antenna. The monopme will be an aesthetic upgrade from the existing metal lattice antenna and will group several antennas for several organizations on one stealth design The monopine will require the construction of two equipment shelters (230 square feet each), and each shelter is designed with a stucco exterior and concrete the roof in order to blend with the residential zoning to the north B Design Rewew Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Coleman) reviewed the protect on February 15, 2005 The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval, subiect to conditions of approval requiring that additional live pines be planted around the monopine, and that the equpment shelters be modified to have a stucco exterior The Committee's conditions have been included in the attached Resolution of Approval The plans show that five real Pine trees will be planted near the monopine C Gradmg Rewew Committee The project was reviewed by the Grading Review Committee on February 15, 2005 The Committee did not identify any grading issues and recommended approval D Technical Rewew Committee The Technical Rewew Committee reviewed the protect on February 15, 2005, and recommended approval E Environmental Assessment• This protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) NEIGHBORHOOD NOTIFICATION The City Planner sent an informational letter, Site Plan, and photo simulation of the proposed monopine on January 10, 2005, to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed monopme Residents were encouraged to contact the Planning Department to review the plans and/or ask questions Planning staff did not receive any phone calls or correspondence from residents ~'oZ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01176 - T-MOBILENVEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY, AND CVWD • March 23, 2005 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site No correspondence has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01176 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DG\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Topographic Survey Exhibit "C" - Photo Simulation Exhibit "D"- Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Monopine Elevations Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated February 15, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01176 ~J L '3 ,Z ,~ ~ ~ a I ~ ~~i `~ ~ ®~ I ~~ ~ rl m • I ~ ~~ .it- --Sr- ~ -- ~--- ~ • f ~ ~ ± ®~"a o ~ ~ I I -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ® _~ b 1 ~ A ® ~ $ o ~ 9 ~ a~ x W ~ r a,;~. ~ _ ~ _ ~.~. :,.-- ~' o. s. p, yy,~.y i oa ~~y14d+.31U~14- gii ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ • • rK Ar A 1. P i•y 9 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~df ~ ~ t ~i ~ t ~~ ~;E~ ~• ~~ {~ ~ . 6f a~P ~' ~ Yr d D • ~ •~ 7 W .~ ~ - ~ yF ~y ~~Z~ d~ 4Q ~X~-~ 'A~ ~-~ IP~aF°I° I~~E~•~Ila.a~ `~i ~~E ~ i j ii ; e!'~i I I~ ^ ' III ! II~ III ' III, III III I I I I' III I I ~gg] g~~ ~ i.°d ee~ F ~ 7efe ege~ ~' ] ' 2C2 18 ]qj ~ ~]8 ~ ~ v Sfi b MIS M' ggRi II~ ggP~~ ~i li ~i 2iU i B] 1~ ' C i 91 af ~ '~ ~`~ ~~ ~~ ttj i i ~ ~ g1g~ 1 1 i '~ "^ i& ! i D9 I '~ ai i' i g ~ e i ~~ a 9~ 9 ~ d 8 ~ ] • = d 1 • ' ~ ~ i . ii g ~~s~)g ,, ~~ ~ ~~'y~~ ~~~~a~~ ~'9~~R pA$° ~~~ • i i~ IAie •;~ 3 B a~ IRR ~~aR w]i~°A $i.R3 ii~8 ARE. 69~ia~x R]R !! 09i~ R.aA~g 8'9 ~~R .., eii~§' .,E ~i~A]9' ]6i ! ~9i ~7iS ~~:R~B 1`°~ {eI~1 9g ai9~i •i IO ~8F' ii~'9~ @°~ a • .9 i~R 8j ~i~ 1199' ~ . A• i _. ~~ • !"d c ] ~ _ ' . i ~ idg ~ 6 ~ ~ pB cnwAne X cingular , g R ,,_ e~~ig~ Rv~vlno Ine WIRELESS ] ..~• 445 J ~• ~ ~ ~ b ~~~~ GW3C uo°~i.>e }}A5 uICHELSON ORIYE SUITE 100 ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~~•A~ E GBCf`9tllit IRVINE LALIGORNIA 9I61S ~~+ai a 1 C~ Photogaphw ®mulaLOn prepared by lu&aNe# $~ 2927 De le Vwa Street • Santa Barbara, Ca6forma 93103 • (303) 898-0367 • www m&ane#.com r, ~1 aaneHEZr ~~/ t~i1~S8=~ C (fJ • // 55 L i i i i C Y pp {{ E ~ a ~e y ~ 6 pL C p d ~ 219LB YINtl0]IIYi 3NIAtll ~~ ~ 001 31105 3AItl0 NOSl3NJII1 SfCf k;; ;kis8 ~ _.~.~, _ o F ~ ~ r pp ~kFF H B a p 6 ~a C ®e p ®~ pp Fa ~ 9. i1 SS313211M € - 4 W ~ a 33 " " Q ~~ ~ ~ 9e~~~ kC z ~~ ' _ . _ ,.IL'~Cl~ul~)( ,/ . e~ ~o~ ~gg3 //~ ~ ~ e s a ~ s . r~ e~~ 8~z3 i ~ I i 0 I I ~~\\ i I I I I I I ~ {F{2f `l1~~JJ ~ q R 4 I^ I I~ i la I c f ~? ~~ ~ f ~ I J i~ i I~ I ~ F f- ~- f~ o i I" f I I '~Y1 ~ R\1 a ~ E~ E ~~ J f e~ I I f I I I I ' m I~ I Iw I o a I w 1 p 1 iP+` OI-II y V ~ i I^ 4 I~ I ~ a IF§ ~ e- v c- ~~OIw m _~~I ~ ~ g mo-0 U I i tl I 41 IZ r N ~~~ 10 I N ~ .v-nl I I J I / I' I ~3~ ~ - t ~~~ i ~ I I ~ I I I l i ~ ~~ I ~ a~ ~ Y I ~ ~ ~~ I ~ m o m ~ 3 cy W ~W C~ y ~ ~` I ~ i o I I~ .~ ~ I e ~ ~°~~ 3 ~ V V d N V M 1 1 3 ~ k .. / g N ~ 3 W~y U J $ ~ o k 3 E E E ~ ~ J c i i i i r ~yi ~~v 0 @ g~~~ a ~ p 6 9 ~ ~: 6 ~ 0 E19Z6 YINtlOIIIYJ 3NIAN1 9~ OOl 31105 3AIN0 N0513NJIY1 Stff ae 553132JIM ~~~~=; Y a ~ F _- g 2~ = « gd333p ~ °~ ~ pz ~~~ ~ _ ' = a JL'~r1~U~~ ~{ . 9~ s~~ ~~a 1 A S a 'a - ~° Q .e-v~ v-u a-m a a z ~ i s ,99.3x„ 03 .9- 9, - N ~• Z Q pap„ I 5k G ~~ J V ^ I 1 6~A ~ ! - a c i ~ I r n o ~~~ ~ e __ w d ~ ~ N m ~ fY Q ~ o u ~ n B B ~ I , ~ p ~ + g ~ m o ~ I ' $ y $ ~ ~ ~ a ~ a E g6 H ~ g G J ~ I fn ~ M 5 Q R 1 ~u N K ~s eF °' o d N ~ ~ VI o ~. ~~ 0-s .UYV .V-Sfi ` ~~ ~~ ~ n'F Q i~ ~ e 2 ~ ~ s I tl ~ _ y ~.~~ ~ ~ 0 ,L11?1 ,,I ~~ •i ~ ^I I tt A~:~ f3~ R 1 ~'. s$ ~ e-. J _.~ ~~ 4 __ p 1~~99 O ~.- i - r~ -----_"i : i i „ J ~ ~ m o ~ ~U N II F s~ e-9E - .v-i~ .L 0 >.~ II ~ i ~ S p 8 t ~ ~ 7 i o re I .v-o[ yy Z k y ff~~ ~~ ~ m ~ U II / v lu ~.._ . r~ ~- > > > ~ ~ ~~ •p@ ~ l~ eptl~ ~ ~ @e@p L @@& E~ pC Ep4C g~ 5 it9Z6 rINCOfp1p 3NIAN1 I~ 001 311fIS 3AItl0 NOSl3H31H Setf 5 8 CII'k~1 . -.~..e~ ' € F 3 ~~ ~ ~ 9F D a Ia ®e ® : ®a . 9 91 SS3l3a l M ~ z ~~ ~ ~ ` $$ E(Q 0 p ~ d~ e L A a ( E g 5_ y - ~~j ^ .~~ill IFJ~~.J x ry . ~~ I ~,o~ € ~~ p g ~ $t ' CQ 7 j 1 a~ - ~ I» I~3 9aa3 J ~ vW p ~~ s@'~'= ~'s ~~ ~ ~ e s ~~ g~ ~~~ t, a ggg BB ggyy ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ Bff ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ § ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ $BpB $BgB 3^ gBB Bkq yy Bg$ t Bggpg g$g Bg8ss~ ~ @ H~~ESa§ ~~~ ~~i&~ Hd fr~tl~ I~ HFd~ dS H€~~~ x, wt - . ~ ~ ~ . v 11 <~, ( _ ~ e- v-vi f •j , ~ ` r ~ ~" !SI ~. •, ~/~ a v Y ~ ' ' ~ ~[Ifvpz~ t s ` ` # ~C' ~ ~, ~~ ~ % ~ ~ f.. g ~~ ~ d € € ~~ 7. B ~ ~ ~ .c~i a-oi NNI .0- SL .0- Sr e-1v Q .o- oz M .o- vv .o- ze F N o-s o-aoi owevrcn azsveaa o-so~ n. a ~~~ E ~az"ae : ~ a g 5 ~gq , ; 3W. ~~~•~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ g~B ~p~~ g~ p@3~~~~~q ~tl ' 3 ~ E0 ~3~~~~^0 ~~ ~~ ~~ 's~~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 d . ~y1 _~ ~6 f ~ ~ t ~ '' It<v K e xf r ~ '~ `/ t R rs .r x -°-° v 1 ~~~ : ` ~ d f 1I t^ ~ 1 . Y " k p ~ ~ ~ t u•.{I~ {~ 0~ W " a _ 8 /g ~ ~ ~ ~ KK ( 8 8 8 o E 8~ g~ ~ g ~ ~& ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ • c-ri a-oi k~ s, .e-~e o- o- w ~ . a_ ze o-s .o- mi nxleoxoN msoeoua o-soi (A ~~N ~~~ ~~„ E_q u -Y CVOSE Y N Z 1 W -d vv-a 5'e. O .A m-o -o 6] -0' 5 5- C ~~ ~° ~ 8 8 G~ 8 8 8 8 • '~ a: j 9 1s- r ~ £ ~" 1 ~ ~ E z 5 q~, arc . ( '~ ` ~ . T N . f + „~ . ,t~ ~ Y c a • a,. ~~: ~'~ ~ ,. i ~ .. ~ ~~ ~~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N 9Jjj) 1~! gYtl 9 ~ tl yM ~yM JJ 1yj~c ~yy pypypy $ y ~~y ]LL~e~ i3 ~ ypy t ~ N 99 ~ ~ = M v y L' 105 b PPCPOY4 YpppN ICO -0 5 b m •~ w eo -e- i ]0 -o er-v u -o t 5 -0• M N 10-0 1.-J e ~ ~ ~ Z - ~~~ ~ ~ ~' '8 G 8 8 8 8 ~ ~~ A 4 „ A ,. . I ,._ .~. ~ : ~ ` ~ ~ r E a-a. ~ v of \ . •. /~ ~1.~ ~ ~/'• .. - i~ ~ e - • `' .r N~ , 1 . _ `' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ` _ a ~`'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ pp ~~~ ~b8 g8 " t~$A e ~ pw< ~~~ ~s ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ e~ ~ ~ s 1 ~a a ~ a, ~^ ..~ 8 A ~ ~~~ ~ g ~~~'g G~; 4 4 ~ B ~ ~~~~ ==~ g~ ~ . r X cingu lar ~ ~ 4 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~i¢sa~~ ~ D ~ ~' zm b r WI RELESS IB 'i Yp ~ Y c® ~ E @ Gg~ 's o ~l`~tll Ilp ~ }}e5 uICHEL50N DRIVE SUITE 100 It IRVINE CA4PORN4 91613 a ~ ~ ~: '~~ ~ t t t t 5 ° DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p m Donald Granger February 15, 2005 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01176 - CINGULAR WIRELESS, WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY AND CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT-A requestto replace an existing 100-foot high lattice antenna with a 106-foot high monopme wireless facility m the Very Low Residential Distract (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, located at 5765 Etiwanda Avenue - APN• 0225-122-12. This project is categoncally exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption -Existing Facilities) Design Parameters: The project site is located at the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract (CVWD) treatment facility at 5765 Etiwanda Avenue (south side of future Wilson Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue) The applicant is proposing to remove an existing 100-foot high lattice antenna tower and replace it with a 106-foot high monopme "stealth" design The proposed monopme, at 106 feet in height, exceeds the height limits of the Very Low Residential District (35 feet), and is classified as a Ma1or W fireless Communication Facility. Mayor Wireless Communication Facilities are not permitted to locate within residential distracts unless the proposed faality replaces an existing facility for purposes of a co-location. The proposed monopme will provide three antennas forthe CVWD, two antennas for the West End Communications Authority; and, one antenna for Cingular Wireless and adequate space for a future cellular antenna. The monopme will bean aesthetic upgrade from the existing metal lattice antenna and will group several antennas for several organizations on one stealth design. The monopme will regwre the construction of egwpment shelters (230 square feet • each), and each shelter is designed with a concrete file roof The facility is located over 350 feet from the nearest residence. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues• The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. In order to create acluster-like appearance of pines and soften the impact of the solitary monopme, several real pine trees should be planted around the monopme and egwpment shelters. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. The equipment shelters should have a stucco exterior in order to blend with the residential distract to the north (presently vacant). Policv Issues. The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. There are no policy issues a ~~ ~~~ ~~t~sCS='~' Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Rewew Committee approve the pro)ect subject to the Mayor and Secondary Issues addressed as recommended above. Desi4n Review Committee Action: Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Donald Granter Committee recommended approval r~x`kse s~ 'F-~'' E~2 RESOLUTION NO 05-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01176, FORA 106-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PURPOSES ON 12 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 5765 ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-122-12 A Rentals 1 T-Mobile, West End Communications Authority, and Cucamonga Valley Water District filed an application forthe issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01176, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 23, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Wilson Avenue, with a total street frontage of approximately 662 feet and a lot depth of approximately 774 feet, which is presently improved with a water treatment fanlity, and b The properly to the north of the subject site is zoned Low Residential and is vacant, the property to the east is zoned Very Low Residential and is vacant, the property to the west is zoned Very Low Residential and is developed with single-family dwelling units, the properties to the south are zoned Very Low Residential and are developed with single-family dwelling units and are vacant, and c The application proposes the construction of a 106-foot monopme for wireless communication purposes that will provide co-location opportunities for multiple tamers, thereby, meeting the regwrements of a Mafor Wireless Communication faalityvnthin a residential district, and d The proposed monopme will replace an existing legal, non-conforming 100-foot high lattice antenna tower with a monopme design that blends with the natural environment, thereby, ~l3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-20 DRC2004-01176 -T-MOBILE, WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY, AND CVWD March 23, 2005 Page 2 mitigating the visual impact of the antenna tower and providing an aesthetic improvement, a design goal of the General Plan and Development Code e The City Planner mailed an informational letter, Site Plan, and photo simulation of the proposed monopine on January 10, 2005, to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed monopine Residents were encouraged to contact the Planning Department to review the plans and/or ask questions Planning staff did not receive any phone calls or correspondence from residents 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the ob/ectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity. c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the • Development Code 4 The Commission herebyfinds and determines that the pro/ect identified m this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301(a) of the State CEQA Gwde6nes 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of an existing 106-foot high monopine The color of the parabolic antenna and all appurtenant supporting brackets and attachments shall be painted to match the monopine. Any expansion, modification, or alternation to the monopine shall require review and approval by the Planning Department 2) At least four real Pme trees shall be planted around the monopine and equpment shelters Final design, planting location, size, and speaes shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval dunng plan check Species shall match that represented by the monopine 3) The equipment shelters shall have a stucco extenor 4) All egwpment necessary for the operation of the monopine shall be contained inside the egwpment shelters E-/~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-20 DRC2004-01176 - T-MOBILE, WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY, AND CVWD March 23, 2005 Page 3 5) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 6) Signs are not permitted on the monopme and equipment shelter 7) The monopme and all appurtenant equipment shall be maintained m good condition at all times Damaged branches, needles, and/orother appurtenant equpment shall be repaired promptly 8) No wireless communication factlity shall interfere with the public safety radio communications system including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz franking system If such faality is found to interfere with the public safety radio system, it shall immediately cease operations until such time as the problem is resolved to the satisfaction of the City Fire Prevention/New Construction 1) The property must be kept clear of all combustible vegetation. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST' Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS: i E-~s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENL DEPARTMEN* STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01176 SUBJECT: 106-FOOT HIGH MONOPINE WIRELESS FACILITY T-MOBILE, WEST END COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY, AND CUCAMONGA VALLEY APPLICANT: WATER DISTRICT LOCATION: 5765 ETIWANDAAVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Comole4on 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-20 and Standard _/_/_ Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actiwties and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced Hnthin 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ /_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations Li ~~O Protect No DRC2004-01176 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bulding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits 5 Ail site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldmg, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waroe compliance with ail sections of the Development Code, all other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landsceping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and to no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwldmg design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detatled landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods Comole6on Date / I -/-/- / / / I / / / / I / -/-/- -/-/- / / / / ~'~'/ Project No DRC2004-01176 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conddioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (DRC2004-01176) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and 'lvet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal ~ 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_l the City poor to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fenang and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/ Bwlding and Safety Department H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be /_/_ marked with the protect file number (DRC2004-01176) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Droersion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits Issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Offiaal after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and pnor to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/~ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. E-/~ Project No DRC2004-01176 Comolehon Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) I. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for properly line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califomia Bwlding Code for required occupancy separations 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed J. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance Huth Califomia Bwiding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of budding permds 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomia registered Ciwl Engineer / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I L -[ / T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE March 23, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner gY Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAPSUBTT16908 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -A proposed subdivision of 41 units for residential condominium purposes on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN. 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, and 32 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00449, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449-PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 41 condominium units on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, and 32 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232 and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density. 10 96 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Multiple-Family Residential (condominiums)/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant/Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West Single-Family Residential/Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Items "F" E "I" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16908 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 2 C General Plan Desionations Protect Site -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre) North - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling per units per acre) East - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre) D Site Characteristics The 3 74 acre site is comprised of six parcels and slopes gently to the south There are 19 trees on the site of nine different species Three trees, consisting of a Canyon Live Oak, Floss Sdk, and a London Plane, are in good physiological condition and will be boxed up and relocated within the protect site ANALYSIS. A General The applicant is proposing to construct 40 condominwms and preserve one existing single-family home, integrating it into the protect Existing on the 3 74 acre site are four wood-framed structures with stucco exterior that will be demolished with the protect Two of the structures are single-family dwelling units that were constructed circa late 1950s/early 1960s Both of the single-family dwelling units have substantial fire and water damage, and are presently uninhabitable The two other structures are accessory buildings (garage and workshop) and are in need of minor repair None of the four structures are examples of architecture or craftsmanship that was once common and is now rare, nor are noteworthy examples of a particular architectural period or style The protect design includes preserving in place the single-family house located on Baker Avenue West of the protect site are single-family homes, and to the north is a multi-family condominwm protect To the east are three single-family homes that front onto Baker Avenue, and to the south are two single-family homes that front onto Arrow Route The proposed density of 10 96 dwelling units per acre is in the middle of the Medium Residential range of 8-14 dwelling units per acre, hence, the protect qualifies for the use of Basic Development Standards The protect wtll consist of three plans, ranging in square footage from 1,434 to 1,619 for Plan 1, 1,602 square feet for Plan 2, and 1,543 square feet for Plan 3 Plan 2 has a subterranean garage, and Plan 3 has a partially subterranean garage All plans have a ledgestone base with a decorative stucco over foam moulding cap, craftsmen style windows with stucco over foam surrounds, and decorative cornice Some plans have incorporated faux wrought iron balcony railings, corbels, louvered shutters, and wood siding as accent elements and materials B Tentatwe Tract Maa SUBTT16908 Concurrent with the Development Review application is Tentative Tract Map 16908 The tract map proposes the subdivision of air space for residential condominwm purposes, which will allow individual ownership of the units and common ownership of the buildings, open space, parking, and driveways F ~ 2- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16908 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 • Page 3 C. Minor Exception DRC2004-00233 The project includes an application for a Minor Exception (DRC2004-00233) that was previously approved by the City Planner to allow a penmeterwall height of 8 feet along the perimeter of the project for sound attenuation and grade differential purposes The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 An acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed and concluded that units near the south property line, with frontage on Arrow Highway, wtll be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA. The exterior noise level can be mitigated to less than 60 dBA with an 8-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed at the south property line of the protect The proposed perimeter wall along the Arrow Route and Baker Avenue frontage will be decorative, consisting of two contrasting types of split-face block, with ledgestone pilasters at the corners and at approximately 35 feet on center fronting Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. D. Desion Review Committee. The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) on January 4, 2005 At the meeting, the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Mmor and Secondary Issues The Committee indicated that the revisions presented during the meeting were headed in the right direction and requested that the applicant prepare revisions addressing all issues The Committee recommended that the protect be redesigned and returned to the Committee . The Design Review Committee reviewed the revised protect on January 18, 2005 Staff presented revised drawings which satisfied all issues identified by the Committee on January 4, 2005 The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval. E. Grading Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Grading Committee on January 4, 2005. The Committee required the following modifications. 1) a drainage study be completed for the interior roads, 2) the plans be revised to indicate the trench drainpipe system for the entire site, and 3) the plans be revised to dimension the height of the subterranean garages. The applicant revised the plans in response to the Committee's comments and the protect was reviewed by the Grading Committee on January 18, 2005. The Committee reviewed the revised plans and requred further revisions to the Grading Plan On February 1, 2005, the Grading Committee reviewed the revised plans and recommended approval, subject to a condition that has been included in the attached Resolution of Approval. F. Technical Review Committee• The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on January 4, 2005. The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to conditions contained in the attached Resolutions of Approval. G. Environmental Assessment the applicant completed Part 1 of the Initial Study. Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study Staff determined that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short term air quality. The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a • less-than-significant level. ~.~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16908 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • March 23, 2005 Page 4 The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 The protect site will be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA within 271 feet of Arrow Route Accordingly, an acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed by Eilar Associates, and the study concluded that units near the south property line with frontage on Arrow Highway will be exposed to exterior noise levels greater than 60 dBA. The exterior noise level can be mitigated to less than 60 dBA with an 8-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed at the south property line of the protect The study concluded that with standard construction requirements of the Califomia Budding Code, the proposed condos wdl meet the interior noise level requirements of 45 dBA or less There are 19 trees of nine different species on the protect site that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance Tree species include the following White Birch, Canyon Live Oak, Mexican Fan Palm, Silk Tree, Floss Sdk Tree, Pinon Pine, Eucalyptus, Chinese Elm, and London Plane Tree All of the trees were evaluated by a certified arbonst for health and the viability of relocation According to the arborist, 16 trees are not suitable candidates for preservation or relocation because of one or more of the following reasons decline in health and trees growing in close proximity to one another However, three trees, consisting of a Canyon Live Oak, Floss Silk, and London Plane, are in good physiological condition and are candidates for preservation/relocation A mitigation measure has been included regwring that the three trees identified by the arbonst as being in good physiological condition be relocated A maintenance plan has been included as part of the mitigation measure in order to augment the chances of survival of the relocated trees The mitigation measure wdl reduce the impact to aless-than-significant level The Minor Exception DRC2004-00233 is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption -Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) The protect is within an urbanized area with an average slope of less than 20 percent and does not in any way change the land use or density If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant held two neighborhood meetings to discuss the proposed protect (November 29, 2004, and December 13, 2004) Approximately 15 residents attended each meeting. Residents had questions about the square footage of the floor plans, paces, and perimeter wall heights and expressed concern that all plans were two-story designs Residents were concerned about the impact the two-story condominwms would make on their neighborhood There are two-story condominiums and townhomes in the neighborhood to the north and south Residents also expressed concern over the amount of cars that are presently parked on Baker Avenue, and that only the frontage of the protect on Arrow Route would be required to be improved Residents stated that the protect would add additional parked cars on Baker Avenue, and that by not widening Arrow Route from Baker Avenue west to the protect's • boundary, the present awkward traffic patterns from vehicles transitionmg from the two westbound traffic lanes into one lane on Arrow Route at Baker Avenue would only grow worse The applicant responded that the protect has been designed to meet all the City's requirements and that the protect would be conditioned to install the necessary public improvements on Arrow Route and Baker Avenue as the City regwred ~z~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16908 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site Staff regwred the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Fling sign on the property, which was also used to post the City's public hearing notice RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Revew DRC2003-00449 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, ~~ Brad Buller City Planner BB DG\ma r~ LJ Sde UUhzahon Map Site Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 Conceptual Master Pian Tree Location Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Bwlding Elevations Phasing Plan Bwlding Cross Sections for Plans 2 and 3 Floor Plan Attachments Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C"- Exhibit "D"- Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibrt "G"- Exhibit "H" - Exhibit "I" - Exhibd "J" - Exhibit "K" - Exhibit "L" -Design Revew Committee Action Agendas dated January 4 and January 18, 2005 Exhibit "M"- Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-00449 ~ 1 L.J I/~~ JNlX9.~N/JN~ QNV NJ/S~Q & E ~A~AA~I1IId .~,..~ V 0 0 a I~ s~ ~~ EEA'~ 00 K~ 0 ~pK i °EEq+ ° ~ 6$ gpp fffrf f # c~n~ 5 s R 4y °nns: ~'R ° Y< ~ ey tg RR2i: Y d e # xa Q RR+ yd 38 °• RP v 2 ~4e c ; ~~ tld~. ~d ;~~s RR ~i ~55 FR6Y 3 #Ay8 ? ~~ ybf 6p ~~6~. e' Y~~ C 6R~R~ ~3~ ~ t ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 3~ a~~e~ ~ ~xc ~ ~~§ ;~f R EF p ~yip3 +e F 4 e°~g~g~ ~ a l~eS# 77S~#8 ~ ~~ s~~3~ € s e.83~ [Ri~~ ~@ .~ b ~ ppgg ~~ ~~ g~ €~ ~ ~ ~4€ ssflflR~t~ ~ } ~~ i i i 0 f ~ ';i~~~{ri j! F t,.l ~ , ~ #l ~ ~~{~fg; li l#~ s} i lil~~'~ ~G i1~ :• ~~ ~} cE~t~~ ~11 ~`~ # ,. ~; t, ~El:l~ }~i ,~ e'f iii ~~ S ~#t li e t ~ ~ ~~ ~E ~ E y ~i 4 i~ ~~~~~~2~a4~~~d 2s g~ ~@y~q~p$y~&iipp p$~a {$p~g3~g R~@a p~~~~~ F #sZp4Pf Pf F€EYPa~[PP~~ o41A Rya-•R••o o. ~I1 x1111111. 1111111 ti: ~o.~. r,o ~~~~ I~}t ~,~ = jl I~~, ~i~i ~~ ~ ll~i ~ ~f ~~~;~ 1~t^i{ ~~;~ ,'~ul l~E4 3 ##~ F 2'~ ~F 4 ~E ~~# ~3~~ ~3~ ~#1R k~~§ ~k~~ !z~€ 4 8~~ E~ ~~ L •i "`~~ I~~iC 1~ ~~ ~ ~p~ ` JNIU33NI~N~ QNV N~IS3Q iGi ~8J ~ ~A~tfA~I~tId ~ ~;, ~ ~ ~ 1i 11p f 9 A i+ ~ f' . ~ €~ ! ~ e ~l~~~i l;~~~j~~l35~~ ~ljb~~l~ldiiEii~~~l! ~ ~~ ~ eeeeeeeee®e®e®ee®e®® ~ ~ E ~j ©{ of 6 EX1'f~3~T ~ g ~' Ss : Njl~~^~ ,~6i ~~ ~~@F4°,~ ^e~ee J~ ~i~iF~~~~~ F=~~ s ~ ~~9~~i~4~°si~~ ~ o ~~ I~ V~ - - I ~ i ; i - ~ ---©-~ - ~ 1 a r ~= ::~ ~ ~ .~~ ~ = 5~r= `~ - ... - ~r ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ao ~ ~ , a , W ® ~a x . i'~ - _ - - as: B ~ 6 § ~ l i ~ ~ ie 5 if 6 _ k~ n r~s n -l _ ~ 1 ~ r~ ~~ -- - ; ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~~ I r ' ' I 1 I _J 9 xurui~..e'~ ( e l 3Lq • bj ' MOtltltl TIC o Of ~ . ...e "~~~~~~ ••~Il~ NVId ONIOVN0 A1lVNIWI'13Ld.,,,,,,,,,," It ru+a y.+ss va m~~w OL/NYJ YOMOMIDOfL111rtl c3 i~N~3 JN/X3r7AII~JKdQNYN'J757Q anvlmreaaunx~aroreou>sNaoalwl i@~~U-• • ~~~~ (OONOO llNfl Lb) Y111A 1.130'9 u~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ e $ ___~ ~ 1 ;' ~' ~~ ------------------ m~ 1 ~ I _ e[ ~ `F 11 IaIJ. ~ ~ _I - _ 7„ ~"-~. ~ ~ I I ', ' ~ ~ ~~ I ,( ~ •R~ % v 0.a - ~~ ~ ~, ~ :i ;- I d ~ ..'.' I 44 4 r l I~ i ~ ~~Z;~./ `I I ~ J- t I t ri % .n i w ~ .. ~ r~J ~~ = +Q'; ~ N J I YN ~~.~{J' o --, i i ~~ "eEi~ I'~ 2 ~- y a icy, ~ 1 i I ~ ~ '- _.~ I `~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~ I ~ i 1~ iL i I I, '„ I 1J I - ~ IC ( i 'F 'dl ~ " ' i, a i 3 ) '~ I ~ ..off ,1[ __ _ ~ _ , f,---- ~ I' d/ ~~ I ~»~'~ ~ y~ y'I I; L I ~ ~'~ ~ I' I '! r I' ~i ~- ; ; ~t ~~ .,~ ~ °, i:J i I ~ - ~ I ,y a >: ~ ~L ~ I" ~ , ---- - _ - c ~- ~ ~- B _~\ I k ~_ --- ~~--------,----- , -~ s !~ -1--- - ~ ~-- ~ -- --- - - --- 5 -~:;---r'~-~ARR4W- -RDU7E-- -- i _ F 1(~T_P~sT G / Z ~ ~ ~~ b -f P E'I~l~~~~l~l;lla ;~I 9 ail iii ° ~Fi =~ ~ 'I 1 1 1' ~ ++ g l l l l! 1; pw it ~(~+f if j'f;f ii ~~~ ~ uPul~l•luun.r u.l u..+ ~~ ' 0 11::4:lyll(+~I.'!,IIl~I+Ilt .1~61~'(is`a` iilis'I'lll i ,+ ! m ., ~11~` 2 !~! m '/ IN+ S .il f. $ II z II+ z 11 s Ih I; A 117 \~ ~ 1z 'I ~ IC::r'F~"~'Z~;I;S' it ' 'll +~'1 I ' I'+R~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~IIli,li~`i~j~~lij~~ ~~ ' ~~ ~~'~~'! jli 'i~,~'vt!(111 +7 ~~ III °s ~i sIll+~' ~I I it !I.:i 1 :+~ q . II :' 1~ e .t (~II ~ ~ r z ;~ O i ~ i t~ e~ ,~ ; ~IS I~; - e~'i ~ '+_ I;' ,6+ ul +) I~ a ~ I ~ 3 g ~ BAKER VILLA (47 UNIT CONDO) ~'nla ~s NM COWIH+OFAR0.0Y1 Rp1IE89VV<ERRAVE ~ ~~.: f pAMClgpICAlIOMfhG Mial i i ~ °-° "`NOTES AND SECT10N5 T ~! 11~ Ils! -. k I i _;+ _~_y ~t _. i • t~ ~8 PIN EWAVE w p•.y ..-.m o. ` ° `•~•`°~• •°~1~1~ B069L dMY lOtlH13ALLV1N31.~,,.,~ #t ...~. asiw w~.o •m ILiMq MJNWN7f17 t11fJIMM 1i R, i ~V ru o u.~ ~s mi m.m rwn ~Ar/Zi3~/J/~l~• Q/~~~Q 30Y16MYB T311106/iglpYd09310gOMN ° -e ~ iU .~ • ~7 1 ~ L~~~d (OONOOlINf1 L9) YIIN iDNVB ~ a F~ I ~ ~ n IZL~•L~-11t1 s ~~ +~I I' ~ ~~~ 1 rf `! 1 L° itll fle'81 f ~ ~~ `• cl a 6,'1 ePf'1 t `~~ ~~~ P1 ~ ~~ F r L 1'T tl' 4 li ~y 6~!`i IlyslI~111 11t 5116 lOT{~ u1 a 9p i.lF" i ~CP~ L~~ J ° ~ 1 o !- p ~ ,~l:s::l~ ~~ ~o ~~s!1 o s 6615 ;<1 ~' yy q 6; Z ;Il eeii~,pyp e O ~ yip ILfi 1' ~ Z ~~~ ~ e r Y ;tl i > 1 ~!' e Z ~ ~ L~~L~i ~ ~ ~: a o m s s .1111 Qv ~ ~ 0 1"' LL ;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ W 4~ 1" J 1- ~ 1 ~t ~ m ~ i ~.nli ~I [g694llf311S 115 g I ' Eq4 95 p+ 11p5 i ;Ilbllel5l/~ Ilil§§iB~ q illpl~llllis.ll@~~~~ekL~P S ~[gi~ ~ tl~ i t 1 it(irdrn•ruaEr1+S15e.ds° !1 ~ 61i1 ~~# ~°'1 1 ' 1 " 1 1 i es ~is a~~ilili~~ 11tEiiE1~ 1 ~•E 1 ~ii~i~ll~i °: 1 ~d~ I ' .. -- ---- Q -------~---{ p a;sr 1 I ~ ~ ,~;< _.~. I I f a. 8 ~,J _~ r I ,"L : -- 1 I I I ~ ~ "° ~ r t.ig ' I axe I ° ' H a~ e _ r ~ z ~ 1 ~-Y ~ •'~i 1 ~!~ I I ~ --` ` ~,-`_-" ---1 r I I I , , Im ;~~ ~ =,~4 ~ :•~~ ~ Ili i ' ,~- Sc5- Q o~, ri• r_ - ~----I--- ,70--~a.. -~----J a -- -- e..mr xo~rc ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ • •i ~~~.~ ~ ~. ~AU?IH~NIr~~A~L~ ENV ~NJ`~I77S7~~SQ ~' ' & i ~ ~ """'n""'~~'""' I a(~~~~71~1iQ "'""""".~'~ vnnxmna ~- ~~ ~~ ° °` ~, ------- --± -1 -, ^ ,~ J ~l - ~ , J "° ~ '~ ~ 3 f .~ fif ili P - .a ~r o f I I I .x ~S. ~ /~ ~•, o: ~ ~z-. ~I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~, ~ ~ ~ ~ i IO I e I o -_-- azmn ~ nwxxr i f .~ ^^ s am i f~ ExHZ~sT ,~~,~ ~i.l~!l Q Q~ s! Y o y s ~ i Ei ~3 i~~. i~ aBBBBB ~~.~~~ a ~; ~~IILL.WIJ L~ d~ ~ I ~vTw`iawa~r @ IE~, I:~~~ N _ ~~ iy iy c a ~9d9l~iia~~i;l~i~~99~~ ~fE oooaoooooooooo~~a~ ~4~ f I ~~ s Di a I~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I a ~~ r-a ^ o ~ - e ~ 9 ~~ ~ 3 a ~ ,s ~~ _,~ E~-1 _¢ of ~ I~ ~ li! ~~~~ - - ~ ~ -~ fi o __ _ 0: f ~ ~ .~ ~ °° a, i i ;; ~; ~ ~ ~ i i -- -~ ~ ~~e ~~----~~-.oee.----- ~ ~~---- ._ ~! - ...~,_., y~~ ii _ F r, ~ `I ~ ._.. _ Ima3av~salmesvlllwnaaa nwoNnea a,nl t ,~.Im,II/IItl1111 , ~ t ~ I ~ NIIIINWNf~LNI,I u ry n~a . ~~ ~.~r~NN,NNnrN.,sN.NNrr 1 ~f 1 i ~i !ii!!t~ lfff _° 1'• • ~s ls1~ k !i}tsft ttN, sf t jt 1 1liilil 11111` ~uul~ ~61~N6 !!1!!1! bdi! ~nnn .,.... ,,,1...:'::::r 1 s.l.l. j f1 1 tft ~~ tii;i! iJilliil I 1si1+~ (i11~++, ililtl t11t1111 Y ~'f ~flr ~11,1lfH bbb~b lbdll!11 ~ stBt ~ ~ =~gj1t~~ W d6f~~11 YJ i~~~'E 1`11 ~ O ~gGi ~ 1111~e 5 `af~~ IIII a 11'Is 5 ~, '~ ~ e3~7~1 ~ II~~~E » I., fs z J ~Cifif j ~' EEii! ~ /1 G >~ F L a G 7 3 o m~ o~ ~o a ii'a~gaaPq•. .• v~cq ~ ~ ~ia~{ ~i~t~Ei~~~~~}11c~ fFF;FF(Ea~i~~~~~4~g~~i1~~{g ~~ ~~~ ~ p6 ~ B~ ~ $~~ , ~g ~i~ ~ a~~~e~ g~9 ~~ ~ € ~; a X0660 0 0!!000 0 0 0 0000 i ~~t~ i~ ~~ i~ € d 9e ~~ 13y I~€'.,~~9F BSc S~ ~~ S~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ S; SI =~.gsq g i,+,a ~a !a t g' Z i fi8 e ~e~ ~j ~~ ~ ~EI ~~ 3 ! ~33~ii SEs j~ E~ Ej ?~ €~ $~ a I`i 3gR E € gig ~,~ 453 W ..~~~ ..~...u u ~.~ ~o a .~ > [> f { a yf S i II ~ II II 7 II t II I II II II II II I II II II 1 I I i F , - --u 5 9~ ~1~~~ PnvEwAVE DES/CN AND ENG/NEERING ~. mm ic.u ....... e~ n,. ~,~~' m u a .nrv~wm r-n~ 1= gZ`c~X - ~[via.~~Ivi~~AAN~I~IId_ 11'!f~ e~j~J ~~~ R~b4mo~sw 1 i 5 3 E 3 4 d; ~~~ 3 O ~~ Pk g~g ki ~~ ~~: e~~ E_ 4 H tie 4 Y ~ ~3 ~~ ~~ ii ii ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ €4 4 cy g z d~ 1 O a e v v e k ~~g' (j~ ~ ~ a ~ 9 gk~9 ` ~ k~ to E !f ~€ !~ ~i= ~ !~~ ~ ~ ~~gisgi1{ '''' x'3'4 ~ ~~~~r~~e°j~ k~kkBkSki~B ~ {i }4 i8 tk ~~ E~ ~~ 8 8 y(~~~ pp~~ e~{~ y~ ~~ k Y~ [2 ~1 ~i R~ ~$ RY ~ ~ Ya LY 1Y 1'Y ~~ oo©oooaoo©o oooc a'~ ~ a k~ ~~k ~~~;as ~ ,ik ~ ~ ~ k;4 I k; k ~ ilk e~ p ~ a ,s ~ 36 ~ 3s 34 i 3 l~3~lkss6k e ~ e k8~ ~ ~ l~~~6~t9~ ~ ~ sY qq yy lisb..i Y~: 8eii8.$i.6: moomm ©0©0+0 I ~ g P ~(J:y ~i ~~ 9 LYE Fli i A~ ~~ _~-~ 0 ~~ ~~ ., r 9 h ~§ Y s § v ~~ ~~ ip°4 F iY( Z y ~ !~k ~~ ~~ s • r P ~~ h~l----l~ ~mr. uu-w° °~ a ~~ ~~ d d ~t°~,.~ ~.ra h'iC A JNIaI~~N/JN~ QAN NJIS~o " ~ { i ~A~t~1~I1iId ~ € ~ a~~~ ~ ~€~(ll~„E4 9~~$e 9 g ~!€~fF=~ I!l.I~ 9 ~s ~ ` ea € Ee t > > a€ ~ f , ~ [' € ~ i f ! €~~ ~i 3g il; p a~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1€ f€ €F €F @ ~ ~~~6~~~~la°l~~o~~~a~~'sl~~€{''€~3~[l~se~i~~l~~~~~~ ~~~~~!(~~ ~F ~ ~ €~ i ~ ~ o F i ~~~o ©o©ooo©ooooo00 ~a E5 ii t~ ii ~ i~ i~ ii I~ i~ i~ °D I^®~I ~4 <_ I ^ i € ~ i 4 I ~ F i i i ~ i dd~d, ~d~b b~ s ,~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ I ~ ~. i uzgz.T ~ ~ ~- °~ N Q ~g i ~ '~ ~, ~, '' ~ I ~xN~R~ i J S I I ~ I ~ O ,l ~ tt~if~ ~!¢E 3~3s9 !laa~jp3 ~ ~ ~,~~ t° i t ~ ~p~ i! I ~{ fiE !~ iE 9 1 1 { :,:,~ ~1 ~' A ~~ ~g !~ 8 3 ~ ~F S~ ~i ~F E ~i ~; IB@i ~~ ~~ s3 B 4 4t p~ 9 p~?~R P212;IPY 91 ~3R 1 i ~ ~ ~ ail ooaooo©ooooo00 a ~~ ~ f a~ 4~~ Pft` ~ 33 !`s's~l~(~llg id~~'§ ~ 1~ .p „ ~~~~~~P~~~ia3~4~~ FeE~~` a ~i~~~~~~~~~~44nesBt~i~6Ff ul mm ~o oppm o a.. ~., ~.:..;~. ~a ~ I~~iC ~~~~~~. `JNRl.~~N/JN~ QNV NJIS~O ~A~A1~I~IId ~! N w..aaa.~.~...,~ ,~....~c. ~ . ~. ,.,...~°° a.. vnn~a«a ' ~~ < ~~~ i! 1° jf3 ~~~ c ~ aqt! 6 ~ p~;~g~~;i ipil,~ ~t~i!~:i~~1~~~s 0 oaomoooo v ~; Q t Z ~\ /~ ~r~a'~ 9 4 n i ASivvL w+mv I v.~.nawro~m axuav+ am~bb1 VTY.iGM P 6 i q - ~~ .. ... ~~ p a gFg~e Y~ pp$d~ 4 s n 4 3 M Q P b ~~ T n ,W ~: ~ °.a ~ ~i~iC ~~~~~~w ~N;~~~N,~~ns~%ua --I-'mom lii'~l19~ 6 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ga €a i' 1~ .~ _ _ u ~~~..u ~~ ~~ _____r__ ©; ~ a ~ o; 3 6 ~~ i~ i ~~I- o; i ~~ , m m ---®-~ -- ~ - i 1 m m ID ~ ^ - - -- -- -- v.,...m, __ __ ,~~. » ~ _ '~ a ,~ .'.~ ~ ^ ®~ ~ i ,~ I €p q a 6~a~ ~ r ~ iawyysa ~~$A ~ ` 9 y~ L ® ~ ~ ~ ~} +1 ~ < ~ ~ ~ ® "e" . ~ ~ ~! ~ ! a i ~, `O`' ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ m 1 ap ~s :~ fff~ ~ ! ~~ ~ :~ .ate i - _ ®~ g ~! ~ ~ i - ¢ ~ I ~< ~_. . -~ ~ . N _ p _ ~~ -=, T KA i E ®6 ©i ~ e .~ ` +' I ~ ~ I ; U e - - ~ e _ - ~~ 31~tl MOtltl1 _~_ - ~ ©j ^M ~~~~ aeu~~wo ~.i~~°in-wno°Sm ~d1@ I w+ 1 .re.. mv'°«»v. ~....w ~~~5~~~~~~ a JNIXB~A'I~~~N~~l; a~ ~ ~w f %~ f `{ 3S5y !ig R }4Y`{ 4 SS~ ~ Y ' Q ~6~ Yt? i~ee g~j~E !9 ~gtl y~ ~ y~ ~ ~a ,7! 6S} i ~ ~p !E ~ ~ ask xF j g- f ¢~! i 1~ ~ gag n SYS 9F ~ ~Y1 ~ E ~' €p ~~a~~x ga Ee:~ne Ff ! !td i9~~~ Ea! $+jg3~:~9 a} q'q. ~ ~ pp`y g F a p~ }44 !~9 ' fy a Y 3 j a e { (,~ Y{ Apia ~i a"aii pYp ~~7[33iH y~li6 !q~ ~g~~~~~FTF~~3g y4 ~~~~ ~~6n P eef ~~e ~a°p~~ ~Sa ~~°~1 ~Iii:7bt Y~~a ~i `sI €'t9r= S~ge~ s~~:~~ g~~:~l 3331E !E is~ t P aYe ~§~ t js ; : e: ~~ a~ ~ ~I~Ei € :d~ a~ ag 1 e sl Y ~ a . ~ ss Y'4 ~ x s ~ t:s~ at~~:~:a~ ^ wo 0 0000 a m ©a om ~ m©ooo© ~4 4 i i i i ~~ i ~i. ~ ~ i i i ~~ i ~ n i i i ' ~ ~ ii i Q i ~ ii i ~_ i ~ ii i i ~ ii 4 i i ~ ii i i i ii ~ i i ~ ii i i i ~ ~ i i y ~ i i 6 ~ ~ ~ ®3 i i i i i i i i r ~~ 1 ~ s 3 ~ 1 i ®a ~' ~ -I ~;~ ~~ ~~ ~~ •~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~k S O .. ~~ ~ b `J ...-- ~ = ~ ~ I,~,C ~n~ar.~an~i~~AA~~1~IId s U I O I I I I I ml i i I I ~- I I I I I I I I I II II ~~ ! o g F4 i I ;F€ y{Bj f I ~ F~gjj i!t I I ! I ! ; liii° 7F~'~i ~, ~ eo0 gg I ~ §¢ i € t g a y I F ~{~ ~~~ l8~~~~~f ~ i ` It€, ~I~ 1~g1gs~a t~} ~ ! fl~lxt~€Fii}~p~~t~99tat ~i F oom oo~moao I ~, i 0 g! li ! E Yt ~ E r iy! S!f I ! ~ ~e ~ t ~ 1~ Q9 g3~ ° x' e e I ! A E ij e~ a k~k 3° I~ s ;a4; ~ ~ ! E 3 ° tF ~ i F~ ci R E~ e ~~ ~a~~°e~~4il~3l Eg $~€€te ~ ! ~ ~ ~S ~l p~p'ee"g~~~tl ~€jF~t~ I I ~f ~ ~ FI ~! f .`ip €~il~ g~g 31Q e~ €i ~ 13 : i 3F ~= 3EF ~ €l7it ! iE~ 1~ omoomooo~ o 4 { F O "•m..•.~.'•.... ~ 9 2•a4 wall ~cw ,may, my~y e 1 - ----~g ~s ~ ' R ) ~4 1 S ~ ~g~'ay - _' 91 % 6 + 4 ~; pp~ R; e9 ~~ ds 4 x ~~ r 0 d~ 8P P ~4 ~~ 'n ~' 8 6 ~~ ~~ 4 ~Y ~~ dJ di O O ~NI1/,~~N/:JN.'~ QNN N~IS~Q ~A~AAd1~IId 4 ______ t ~_ ~~ ~~ ~_ ~= n ~s ~I ~~ I ~$ i~ ~g n ~_ n~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ l ...~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~.I~l Q O • I ~ ---.~ -- ~~ _ i o vu-w~~..Fw°Iw9. rn r~ "/]IS~MYlI~~~44 ,I ~Nl?/~3A~/Ji1i3 QA~6' NJ/S~Q ~A~Lk~~Iad ~i `,S~ ~~ ~,~.~~,~,~~m~%ua .~,~.,.I .,~ ~.. ~~ _~~ ,_~.~-~ Ra ~ 1~4C ~~~~~,~~n~N~%ua o~~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ , .. ~. ~""..,~ ~ ~, ~ ldiC JN1UH.~N/JN.~ QNV NJ/S~Q ~A~LfA~11Qd ~ 3 ~ ~ .,~,. Q n a 4 ~ ~t i Y ~ •-- - ~` ` s e i p t~ '3 ~ s ~- ~ ~~ 3 ~ ° 3 a - ~„ e .- -- ~ s ~_ ~a ; ~ i € ~1 L~ !~ /.Y DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.40 p.m. Donald Granger January 4, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A proposed subdivision of 41 units for residential condominwm purposes on 3.74 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28, and 0207-591-31 and 32. Related Files. Development Review DRC2003-00449, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTANDbEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449-PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 41 condominium units on 3.74 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN. 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28, and 0207-591-31 and 32. Related Files. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to construct 40 existing condomirnums and preserve on existing single-family home, integrating it into the protect The 3 74 acres site is comprised of five parcels, and consists of 4wood-framed structures with stucco exterior that will be demolished with the protect. Two of the structures are single-family dwelling units that were constructed circa late 1950's/early 1960's One of the single-family dwelling units has substantial fire and water damage, and the remaining single-family dwelling unit is presently in inhabitable condition The two other structures are accessory buildings and are in need of minor repair. None of the four structures are examples of architecture or craftsmanship that was once common and is now rare, nor are noteworthy examples of a particular architectural period or style The protect design includes preserving in place the single-family house located on Baker Avenue. West of the protect site are single-family homes, and to the north is amulti-family condominium protect. To the east are two single-family homes surrounded by vacant land, and to the south is an established single-family neighborhood. The 3.74-acre site slopes gently to the south, and has 19 trees from 9 different speaes Tree speaes include the following• White Birch, Canyon Live Oak, Mexican Fan Palm, Silk ,Floss Silk, Pinon Pine, Eucalyptus, Chinese Elm, and London Plane. All of the trees were evaluated by a certified arbonst for health and the viability of relocation. According to arbonst, 16 trees are not suitable candidates for preservation or relocation. However, three trees, consisting of a Canyon Live Oak, Floss Sdk, and a London Plane, are in good physiological condition and are and will be boxed up and relocated within the protect site The protect will consist of three plans, ranging in square footage from 1,434 to 1,619 for Plan 1, 1,602 for square feet for Plan 2 and 1,543 square feet for Plan 3 Ptan 2 has a subterranean garage, and Plan 3 has partially subterranean garage All plans have a ledgestone base with a decorative foam moulding cap, craftsmen style windows with foam surrounds, and decorative cornice Some plans have incorporated faux wrought iron balcony railings, corbels, louvered shutters, and wood siding as accent elements and materials E><tl~~~'~' .Ln ~ r DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16908 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 4, 2005 Page 2 The protect includes an application for a Minor Exception (DRC2004-00233) that was previously approved by the City Planner to allow a perimeter wall height of 8 feet along the perimeter of the protect for sound attenuation and grade differential purposes The proposed perimeter wall along the Arrow Highway and Baker Avenue frontage will be decorative, consisting of two contrasting types of split-face block, with ledgestone pilasters at the corners and 30 feet on center. The proposed density of 10.7 dwelling units per acre is in the middle of the Medwm Residential range of 8-14 dwelling units/acre; hence, allows use of the Basic Development Standards. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. The Development Code requires 360-degree architectural treatment to all elevations. Although the proposed architectural styles are appropriate to the surrounding area, the elevations should be enhanced with additional materials and architectural features in order meet the 360-degree architectural requirement Staff suggests that the following enhancements be made: • Plan 1, FronUGarage Elevation• Extend the ledgestone base to coverthe entire garage . wall plane. • Plan 1, Rear Elevation: Add wood siding to master bedroom pop-out, and shutters to the windows on the second story • Plan 2, FronUGarage Elevation At the kitchen and bedroom #3, extend the ledgestone base up to the cornice on each side of the subterranean garage entrance. • Plan 2, Entrance Elevation Add horizontal wooding wood siding at the bay windows from the ledgestone base to the cornice. • Plan 2, Rear Elevation: Add ledgestone from the base up to the cornice where wall plane extends out at the kitchen and bedroom #3 • Plan 3, FronUGarage Elevation. Add horizontal wood siding from the floor line of the second story to the cornice at the family room and bedroom #3 • Plan 3, Rear Elevation• Add a ledgestone base Add wood siding to the master bedroom pop-out. • Plan 3, Side Elevation Add horizontal wood siding to the pop-out located on the first and second floors at the nook and bedroom #2 Legdestone veneer should be carried all the way to the top of chimney stacks • Decorative metal railings at balconies should be more than lust a straight picket style. • Introduce planter boxes on key upstairs windows DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16908 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 4, 2005 Page 3 The existing single-story home on Baker Avenue that will be preserved and integrated into the protect (Unit 8) was constructed circa 1950's/early 1960's and should be enhanced in orderto achieve compatibility and architectural harmony with the proposed condos. Staff recommends that the following enhancements be made. Wood siding should be added under the gables on the north, east, and west elevations Ledgestone should be added as base treatment on the north, east, and west elevations. The dwelling unit should be painted to match the color scheme of the proposed condommwm units. 3. Significantly more landscaping should be added surrounding the central common open space (pool area/tot lot) This area is almost all hardscape surrounded by parking spaces Secondary Issues. Once all of the orator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues The entryways off Baker Avenue and Arrow Highway should make a stronger statement Staff suggests the following enhancements. Use accent trees, possibly Palm trees Provide structures to define the entrance toprivate on-site space, such as arches, trellis, or larger pilasters at the ends of walls These structures could also incorporate the name/address of protect. The Baker Avenue entry has a sidewalk on the north side of the driveway that dead-ends into block wall (staff suggests deleting this sidewalk because it leads to nowhere) Plans do not define fencing/walls surrounding the existing single-family home at Baker Avenue entry. 2 Elevations were not submitted for the proposed 412 square foot pool house Staff recommends that the applicant design the pool house to match the design, materials, and colors of the proposed condos Staff recommends, with Committee's concurrence, that the pool house be subtect to City Planner review and approval Policv Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1. No wood fencing is allowed. Construct block walls between homes (i a along interior side and rear property line) for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 2 Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 3 All interior private yard slopes are required to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and one tree per 150 square feet of area 4 Where fieldstone is used, it shall be real and from a local source Stone veneers are not permitted Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the protect be revised and return to Design eview ommi ee as a regular item prior to being scheduled for Planning Commission DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16906 AND DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING January 4, 2005 Page 4 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Donald Granger • The Committee recommended that the protect be redesigned and return to the Committee for design review. The Committee felt that the revisions presented during this meeting were headed in the right direction and requested that the applicant prepare revisions addressing all issues, plus the following: Addition of stronger stucco color contrast on Plan 3 side elevation pop-outs b. Use of more creative pool and tot lot shapes c. Use of more creative and colorful plant palettee ~~ h ~>l,~ses~-~- L-3 FS 33 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 7:10 p m. Donald Granger January 18, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A proposed subdroision of 41 units for residential condommwm purposes on 3 74 acres of land m the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN. 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28, and 0207-591-31 and 32 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00449, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449-PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design revew of building elevations and detailed site plan for 41 condommwm units on 3.74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28, and 0207-591-31 and 32 Related Files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, Minor Exception DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration At the January 4, 2005, Design Review Committee (DRC) meeting the applicant presented revised drawings which satisfied several of the Mator and Secondary Issues. The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the protect and recommend approval with conditions The Committee requested that the applicant make the revised changes and that the protect be scheduled for review on Consent Calendar at the January 18, 2005, DRC meeting The applicant agreed to make the requested changes. . REVISED PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the reused plans and provide comments at the meeting Attachment Design Review Action Comments dated January 4, 2005 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present Fletcher, Steward, Coleman Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee recommended approval of the protect ~~ it `_~ • ~~ ~ _ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Ctty olRaxho Cucaimnga (Please type orpnnt clearty using ink Use the tab key M move Irom one Ilne to the next lore) Plann/ng Dldsbn (sos) an-27so ' - - The purpose of this form is to inform the City of~the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies; Ordinances, and, " Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the-City's;,Rules; and' r Procedures to Implement CEQA._ It is important that the. information~,requested~in-this;, application be provided"in `full. ~ - ~ - - . , - _- . ~' . - _ ~'•~ - - - -: Upon review~of the completed~lnitial Study Part.l°and the~d~evelo~ment~:application ~'_ F ~l t >additionaCirifoimationsuct"iYas tiut~~not,limiteiJ'~to; t'raffic,•;noi§g; biological; ii~airtage~and9'- ~~ < -.~ , - vas- t :.. ~ 1,,. .• - a =-1- geological,'r`,epo°rts mayvLeireguireil:~The;P~oject-,applicationwilhnot-tit,deem`t~~FC'or`~ip~e~~'„ ~, unlessttie identlfeiJ special studies/reports`,are submitted~for'review~ar~~~accepted~a~?~; ~,,: complete and`adequate= ;The;project;application,will;not.bescheduledrforrC'ommlttess'~ ark- R] ~ ~eY .: tkclG~ ~Y~ "~ " ~I II.C ..• 1 y ve- I r ~ = ~ ` _ ~'YH ~ !.'~ ~,uyl Al tY-~ i 3--i ~ .. review-unless~-slCrequired',reports are submitted=and deemed complet~~'.forssfaff~`to.` prepare the Initial~Study_.YP~,art`;11-as-cegiiired.'by CE_QA:` In additioriao`tl5e~filing:~fee;4the-.` applicant"will,~be-responsible' fo+pay or reimti,urse theiCi~a)I, tt§iagerits,offcers;_and/or_ ~, r'-. YY.a.a p fit-," consultants ~for,•`aU'costsahfor%,tFie~_,preparation ,review, ~analysts~, recorrminendatioris-,•, ' mitigations,:etc., of;any~sp'ecialsstudie's~or,"reports.:` ~'~~;~~, `~°`"~ - ~ `~ GENERAL INFORMATION: Application Number Iqr the pro)ect to which this /orin pertains' bl~ `7-~7~ -' DOO 8~' INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that rt ~s the respons~bilrty ofthe appllpnt to ensure that the application ~s complete at the time o/submittal, City staN wdl not be avaAable to perform work requued to provide m~ssng mlormabon LJ Proled Trtle ~~ 1(IU.A NameBAddressofpro/edowner(s)• ~R~d~IK ~- s(,1~1~1 l..tl~l ~ ~~-~- ~-(t08(kL- (AP-P II~tG~ 116o Y~ac~~ ~,vs. l.A. vim, cA ~IZSti Name 8 Address of developer or pro/ect sponsor st~ly~ r+s aE3~ovE 11PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSI000NTERIIni6al Study Part1 docPage 1 ~ ~ ~ C Rev 3/17/04 ConfactPersoneAddress. t/WG PM (P(N~4.4AV~ D~SI&I.l 21017 GvHµ~et~ {~I N`i>=. DR • ~ WAS-hUd'T, CP ~l'18~ Name B Address of person preparing thrs /orm (d ddterent /rom above) $AI-tE ~S ~$OV8 Telephone Number. ~~{oR~ ~~- ti1~ '1) Prewde a full sp/e (8-1/2 x 11) Dopy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch rndudes the project site, and rndipte the site boundaries. 2) Prowde a set o/ color photographs that show representative wews into the site from the noRh, south, east, and west,• wows Into and /rom the sNe /rom the primary access points that serve the site, and representahve views of significant features rom the site /nGude a map showing location o/ each photograph 3) Project Loptlon (describe): N0~'fH - W~sT G02N~. ~ P lzoltT~. ~. - t3A1~K~ /AVE. FEZ IN -CHI uzY ~ RP.tJc41o GUGIEG.IOtlc~pc . 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) • ~~-1- ~~ 1- 'L~.- O - OOO ) 0~o~-5Rl-'~-~0-000, pao`~- fi41- 2.b-o-ooo-, 020- III- 26-0-000/ o~.o`[- tQl - 32- o- o00 'S) Gross Sde Area (adsq. fl:): 3.-1({, AG . G) Net Site Area (total ske size minus area ofpubl~c streets 8 proposed dedications)• 3. bti AG 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the project site (attach additional sheet Hnecessary): t~-W pRO P~C GMALTI- ~•AdIU { HoUSI~IE~ GoN?i-lss WI'f#1 gcISTIN~ G-tAd- pl,~d~l AN~'NCt-t~f~l'-", kND 'T~P_ E hlllL F3E No zot•UNE~ U#WEa~s - 11PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSI000NTERUnihal SWdy Part1 docPage 2 , 3(~ Rev 3/17/04 In/omraUon mdreated by an astedsk (ry !s Trot required of non-consbuchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff ' 8) Include a desrnphon of all permits which wdl be necessary from the Crty o/Rancho Cucarrwnga and othergovernmental • agenaes rn order to /ully implement the protect. pl.1lI.DINEt ~f-t6Ti 1=1R~ DE?t~TMENT PF-F~llTi ~TATIV#~ M•Ap, S'[t?-~"( lµ?~V~Ntf=t•17 l'•~P•N, ~fe~ Iz~Moy~•t~ P~RMrf' , A~.1P ~~I..toU~lOt~ Qlrtz~ttT; .. • . ;s .~. ~. . 9) Desrnbe the physical setting o/the site as rt exists before the protect including mformat~on on topography, sal stabdrty, plants and animals, mature trees, bads and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Desrnbe any existing structures on site ~ndUding age and condiGonJ and the use of the structures Attach photographs of sgn~cant features described. In addition, cite all sources oflnformation (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archedogical surveys,~traAicstudles): ?ft!` SIZE Op, PROJECT sCT>=. is 3.'li{- PG fxPosS,. lT's to~IStp~p AS FIAT l.l~iD stNt.~ ~~ Is oNl_Y l4' -O" . bFOQ Dtl~er=lJc~ ~N • 1.1o~'i}i_ ~o Scu'f}1 ~^ININEt. WNl<.1l IS ~.BOtTf 630'-0" PLotJE{ ~~ .. ~ aVe . ZiiER.~- ~~ Q-_ ~xls-t1Nl~ ,. , BUtI.DINEts Ohl 'Ckt>i SCTE.. +4U- ~- ~, . -CNE,1~t ><-~.v,~ rlo as'nNetutsHEP ~~>= zn c~r.ISII~R As ARU+IT~c-ruep,L~( 1-11STt~U+I_. {-FDCdSB• ~IP-ST $Ull.phlEt I,aGA'f>= t7h1 8458 Pl;RaW >?otf-;'~ W)4S BUILT Ihl 1464•, A SthlEtla fAl..llul {irntsE WfT~-l Ahl AT~AU~A Eakk~x~, t3uT 1'f NAS NO ~.ENETt~ ot= S'fYl.!/ To Bl= F-NS'~D~t[PtL ><~,8. BlAll-PINEa #2, #3, ANp #¢ AYE kt-SO oNt= S-to~{ SlNfil~ ~.Mtu( Nut-isms , 8uT T+F~ YsAlz WFIEhI IT WAS 8tltt.T lS uAll=NouU.l. N~IT~ ~ ~~l }~tf~ PNY ~~J'C oR Srfl-!F To FE A ~I-IIS'roR1CJ.L. Hvus~, PND ~iN~( A~ lrl ~. pooh oohtDRlohl~.. W4S No SP~cIP~ pcrlVl'rt~s oN "THE SITE. SIAt'.i# ~AS 1`'AQ-~ ~ P~6N'C o(z • ANIMA.I•_ •Sp6G1ES , U~oE~R?H1c~Al^ 2BM,4~1~, ol= "'bRAdN' t:UUR1~GS: " ~4ou~VEK,, ~ WILL S4VE 3 -fps IN P~ FAIjZCaNDCCInTI ANA P-r=l,aGA't~ "T1if~1 IN ~ ."tH~ Sl'C~.. ". ,' 10) Desrnbe the known cu/fura/ and/orhistongl aspects of the site Gte all sources ofrnformabon (books, published reports and oral Mstoryf TH>=¢.~ .dam ~,lo SP~I~IFIG. ~}ISTo~Y D~ ~A~D intDIGA"'CIN~t T++AT Otl~. ~)l=GT SRS }b45 /stl~( LUl_-CtIQP.I, M•lD/o2. N~IS'Tb~1G~L ' ~S~C'(S . ~u ''1}1bSE~ 4+ 'EXIS'CIt.IF~ $uLDINE;(S..l~R.~ NOT IDEt.TTl~'lEp h5 k-llsTOelL~.t_ 1;40tdsES Accoeclt.let "Iii 'TiTL1=- R€Po r~-~Z'.IT 11PLANNINGIFINAL~FORMS~000NTERUnibal SNdy Partl docPage ~ / -f' ~~ Rev 3/17/04 11) Describe any Hasa souroes and their levels that now affect the ste (a~rcraR, roadway vase, etc) and howthey Kell aAeIX~ proposed uses 'tH~ P~1~c sCC~ Is sUd>/D BY rt>/I&o~6toaG r~ sll.t~l,~ f~-IIL~[ {trTttiS~S, ddlD MtD DENsI'TY MuL-iY i~a-4ll-~( -~auS~S O}J NOWT{{ SIDG•. "fAE MpJo2•t'r! op KolS~ IS GoµIN4 X014 T}kB -C~1~• Ghl ~~w P~uiG 12J Describe the proposed probed m detail This should provide an adequate desrnpt~on of the site in terms of ultimate use that Kell result from the proposed proled Indicate d there are proposed phases fa development the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the antiapated completion of each increment Attach addd~onal sheet(s) H necessary. -[~r~ 3.~y- A~ sr>~ wlu. t~ sug- avlt~D t+dTb t~ sWe~L~ ~.MtU }}61ASE {Wp MUI.`f~(- FA.NII~( ~ftMS~S. g31q SQ- F~" ~C DBDIGP-[~-0 To slNc-~~ ' (~-41t,Y ttaustntg WCTl4 laQp ~ ~T UVABI,E SpAG~. "T}16 S17~ ~otz MU4T- ~pddlll/ }fousttl4 Kos {~oi~f 144-1 `~• ~-T -Co 161q 5~.•#'=C• T#{is ' 4~~GC 'In11ll.ls~ ~'~" ' !a-r 2 I'HAS.i=s , P}kASa= _1 SrAr?ctNEC ~.eouND }-IlD ~ 2ootj AND ' &JD A,P~t.tl~lD WID o~ z~o(~ Pd"lD t' ~ WILL -{~LWW- ~ GoNST2L1GTloN 'TIti1E 1S EST(f~(~CtEp To Bi= A YES ~ t+ll 13J Describe the surrounding prvperhes, rnGudmg mtormatlon on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects lnd~cate the type olland use (residential, commerceal, etc), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, •departdrent stores,, etc) and scale of deve/opmeht (height, (rootage, setback, real yard, eta): Tftl= > :Pl'O_1t=-tX Sl;i'~ is sWP-QOUnIb~D.. 8~ ( •SttJEll,~ . ~AddtL.~( }-}ol(SEL 6aJD MtD ;~I~sCN'. MuL'tl ~FPd-tl~?f - ~-}au k-s• 'fN~ .6.~P- ~ t~W ~INJ'T'S, ANI-~IhLS, oR $UILDW t ~s Pd?JkGETI'T Ga.ID /oR Chi THE PR-R1~G( s17•>=. To ~ tD~rn-I~ ( AS N1s?t7RlGl~LAI,U ( 02 <,,.ll_-t~+~auy P-~+at,~ . 14) ill the proposed proled change the padem, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project ~ -I}4E RoPo~D 20 ~c l+~lU- o Gt+PNEsE -[t{~. pAT[Et'-N ~ scPdJ~ Otz GHi~+~Ct>=*2 S ~ SUK~~oKt•1DI-~ f (~~~pL ~ ~ ~1T, I'T WIIL (,oMPI,EI~ rttE Zoulaiel AI.oNEt WITH t'~PIA~NT PP-ot~e.Tl~S I IPI ANNIN(;\FINAI 1FORMSI000NTERVnihal Study Pad1 docPaoe 4 tzo.. 'i/~ 7/rid 15J Indicate the type of short-term and long-term nose to be generated, mcludmg source and amount How will these nose levels affect ad/acent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed ES-n~t+~~D cflNS'r~uctivN -[11dE ls. ~. ~ ~~. •~~ WII.i- ~ oN~Y 5No2T-'TERM LoNS'TP-flCflolJ KoISE Ca~t~1~A~t~ ~uelNh ~oNSTP-1~tCT1~,. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees 3 MA~L4EZE "~ ~,- `~4~ SfTe BIND Td ~ I-~ Pc ~A+Ifz (C1JDIj1oNS {~olyl A?~RlST l~?o(r'C• ~1loS~ 3 ?eF~S h1V,L BE sAUJ=D AND {?~.PI.Ad•1'r~,p AT ~ ~At1L~.s ~Rwl BOTH AP-~o7ti1 N.ID $AK6~ Ab)E . 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the sde drams No, s-r~o.M u~. wos f~u,~ ~.ou~c ~ P~e~-ty. 18) Indicate expeded amount of water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For further da~cat~on, please contad the Cupmonga Valley Water Distnd at 987-2591 a. Resdenlial (gal/day) 2-~i ~ Peak use (gaUDay) ~«- b CommerciaUlnd (ga!/day/ac) ~l ~ p. Peak use (gaUmm/ac) N/A 19) Indicate proposed method o7 sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ^ Sewer H septic tanks are proposed, attach perco/anon tests if discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation• (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For (urther danficabon, please contad the Cucamonga Valley Wafer Distnd at 987-2591 a Resdenrial (gauday) ~QD b CommerciaUlndustrial (gaUday/ac) ~~~1 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Numbero(resldenba/units. 4~ Q Detached (md~cate range of parse/ saes, minimum lot size and maximum lot sae g 31 \ `•~ Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) ~~ ~~" ~ ~S N~L~ ~ ~~ ~~ 11PLANNINGFINALIFORMS\COUNTERUnlaal SWdy Part1 docPage 5 Rev 3/17/04 2>) Anhcrpated range of sale prices and/or rents • Sale Price(s) ~ $ ~~ ~' ~ to $ 3Br ~~ Rent (p9r month) $ ~ N A `' "ro $' tylA 22) Specdy number o/bedrooms by and type TN~ea ~ 3 HDP>c1.s Pt/Ail.Agl~. ~ Mor~L lA SAS 3 $~D t?ooµs~ ~tODSL IB_MAS ¢ ~D 2ooHS \. MODAL .2P~ ~ ?$ NAVE '~F F3ED ~~1,5~ ' -- F~F1D MODEL'.: 3 .~ • 3 CEP Rbo NtS . . 23) /ndicate anticipated household size by umt type ~~LT£D SIZE ~ ~~ ~{Ol.~ IS 3- 5 ~w -~--+~.tzs P~~ u~rr. 24) indicate the expeded number of school children who will be residing within the pro/ed f;onfact the appropriate School Distnds as shown /n Attachment 8. a Elementary: 35 b. JuniarHigh• ~ c SemorHlgh 3~ ' COMMERC/AL. /NDUSTRIAL, AND /NSTITUT/ONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or mstdutronal uses 28) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operaflon: ~~ X28) Number of employe8s: ~ Total Maximum Shdt Time of Maximum Shift 1 \PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTERUniBal SWdy Part1 docPage 6 / ~~ Rev 3/17!04 29) Provide breakdown o/anhc~pated,ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndicahon ofthe rate of hire for each c/ass~catron (attach additional sheet d necessary) 30) Est~mat~on of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside rn the Gty 31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount o/air pollution emissions (Date should be verified through the South Coast Arr Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283). ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro,ecf been contacted to determine their ability to . provide adequate sernce to the proposed pro,eIX7 K so, please rnd~cate then response ~+~ wA-c~., s~wr~, aatb ~ie~ q~t~.tues f~.v~. ~N coMrAC[EV AID ~DY To {'~oVtb~ '17+~ S~zVIcE. 33) In the known history of this property; has them been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals7 Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not l~mrted to PCB's, rad~oachve substances, pest~ades and herbicides, /uels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage o(any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rl known. NoN~ ~ "T!-toss Ac.-nyl~ sLtG41- As l-4AZA~1=~ous ~+JD/off ToXIL MA'T~Rta.l~ -^~~~. #~'utilD IN ~I~ PZaJ~ ('a-o?P-R-"C~(. • 11PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSI000NTER11ni6al Study Partt docPage 7 ( / ~ / Rev 3/17/04 34J ill the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, ordrscharge o/hazardous andrortoxrc materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? l/ yes, prowde an inventory o/all such materials to be used proposed method of disposal. The locahon of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown labeled on the applrphon plans ~ ~-ofb~ PP-oJ~j l~tU. -.laT INyflIU~- 7#}~ Y p~• I.oNEr-~~Nl `U-d=, S'ToP~bie, Ot' GISUA~4~ op {-IAzA~f?-0tsus fkNp/ 012 'TbXlt. I~tI~R1~l, Did `[~ ~o~~T(. l hereby certify that the statements fumrshed above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and rn/ormahon required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and rnformahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief / fuAher understand that additional rn/ormat~on may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date: ~ ~ '~$' 0~{- Signature: ~~ Tdle: (/ /f o ~1~,0.4r, O~ ,~ . , ,., 11PLANNING~FINALIFORMSI000NTERUnibal SWdy Part1 docPage 8 • z~a Rev 3/17/04 I I I I i I I ~ --' ~ ~ II ~r O O~ O~ OF Qm S ! F ®@ ©@ ~@ 5 4 Y:~ I -~_:__ ----------- ~1 r-, r- ~ e~ -~~~__ ~ ,-~..~-a--.~ -.t ~=„a =,., -~_~~as--tea ^ ~ i~ ~ i I ~ _ ~~ moo. t. - ~ .. ° s9! ~! ~~ ~i ~ I lye" i~ ~j ~ I M } _ I ° Z i a ; I ~3 if I~~ k f ~ ~ ~,I~~ ~ t ~~ ,.. ~ .-,e, - I i I ~ ~- k _.~...~.. , ~_ ~ _ ~ ~ I I I~', ,I I',r,i ';-r. ' VI~ ~,,r: ' ,f~illl ~°I - g I `sG ~ ~' ~4 sid ' I ,I ~3 ~ ~a~1 _ ~~ ;~ ,,.,..., i.._~I~. L.. ,1;II I ,- ~ ^ zl III,, s ~ S ~ I '- - ~ ~ pb ~ I - d ~ ~~ ®ff "~ - - -~ .,.... i<,. t S3 si I I I I ~ . y _ _ __ _ _ _ _- ___ _ __ _ . __ . C ~ I u {e +_ - I - -i .~.,~~ - 3100tl Wi CMOtltlV i ° I i ~~ ~ ®~ ~, ~ # ~ ....., I _" ~~ I Sj ~ GCTY d~ RPNC.H~ GULAMb~ NvxCH W~sT ~oRlJratz. a~ p~zROw potrT+k ~ wiz P.v~. GV~~.t-L std Vt~W (Pal- v1~W ot` PtzoJ~C ~ . i • (31AlIAlNEI .7~1 5p~tr3-1 V~EhI ~RoM p(z.ROW (zaUTE.. (~oNT ice amp Wlr~vow o~) BU11-pinky # I Sau'f~f VI~.(,.J FRoM ~l L~ ( ~aoHT Faa.RAh~ A+~G DwV~ l-iAY~ ~ '~ s 3 x~ 3 s C~ $I~l1L-{7~1J6q ~3 N012TH WEST VIEW ?O ~R ~~ • (I-vGAZtON $k 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and DRC2003-00449 2. Related Fdes• MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2004-00233, Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00232, and Preliminary Review DRC2003-00089 3. Description of Pro~ect• TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A proposed subdivision of 41 units for residential condominium purposes on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue -APN 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28 and 0207-591-31 and 32 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 41 condominum units on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28 and 0207-591-31 and 32 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2004-00233 -PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING - A request to allow an 8 foot high wall for sound attenuation purposes along the southern boundary of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, where a maximum 6-foot wall height is permitted for 41 condominiums on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 and 26, 0207-591-28 and 0207-591-31 and 32 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Pinewave Design and Engineering 21017 Commerce Pointe Drive Walnut, CA 91789 5. General Plan Designation• Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per gross acre) 6. Zomng• Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per gross acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. The applicant is proposing to construct 40 condominwms, and preserve one existing single-family home, integrating d into the protect The 3 74 acres site is comprised of five parcels, and consists of four wood-framed structures with stucco exterior that will be demolished with the protect Two of the structures are single-family dwelling units that were constructed arca late 1950's/early 1960's One of the single-family dwelling units has substantial fire and water damage, and the remaining single-family dwelling unit is presently in habitable condition The two other structures are accessory buildings and are in need of minor repair None of the four structures are examples of architecture or craftsmanship that was once common and is now rare, nor are noteworthy examples of a particular architectural period or style The protect design includes preserving, in place, the single-family house located on Baker Avenue West of the protect site are single-family homes, and to the north is amulti-family condominium protect To the east are two single-family homes surrounded by vacant land, and to the south is an established single-family neighborhood ~ // // Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY-The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR-Environmental Impact Report FEIR-Final Environmental Impact Report NOx - NiVOgen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G-Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The envvonmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) HydrologylWater Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Recreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Qualty (/) Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportation/Trafric DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the ee~„vironment_but at least one effect 1) has been Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 3 adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared E Reviewed Date Date ~ ~~ L~ ~~ W n Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 4 Less Tian S,gnifirant Leu Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PolenOally Sigrvfimnl WiN MNgaOOn Tian Significant No I h In teE I n I C EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments' a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 • b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no histonc buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located approximately 300 feet west of Arrow Route and is characterized by residential development and vacant land in all directions The 3 74 acres site is comprised of five parcels, and is primarily vacant, with one-single family home and an accessory structure located on one of the parcels To west are single-family homes, and to the north is amulti-family condominium prolect To the east are two single-family homes surrounded by vacant IAnd, to the south is an established single-family neighborhood The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground ewshng and new utibty fines and facibbes to mimm¢e unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract / i -lam Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 5 Less Than Sipnifionl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g ~alentlally sgnieant WIN MlhWaon Than SlBnlficant No I C Inrn le0 I C I cl c) Involve other changes in the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments' a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located approximately 300 feet west of Arrow Route and is characterized by residential development and vacant land in all directions The 3 74 acre site is comprised of five parcels, and is primarily vacant, with one-single family home and an accessory structure located on one of the parcels To west are single-family homes, and to the north is amulti-family condominium project To the east are two single-family homes surrounded by vacant land, to the south is an established single-family neighborhood There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to the General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts wdhm the Cdy c) The site is located approximately 300 feet west of Arrow Route and is characterized by residential development and vacant land in all directions The 3 74 acres site is comprised of five parcels, and is primarily vacant, with one single family home and an accessory structure located on one of the parcels To the west are single-family homes, and to the north is amulti-family condominium project To the east are two single-family homes surrounded by vacant land, to the south is an established single-family neighborhood The nearest agricultural use is more than a 1/2 mile northwest from the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan O O O (/) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violahon~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors /,!r ~~ r~ U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 6 Leu than $ignfi0anl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources POtmYally SigmfiOan~ Wlh MNgafiOn Than Sigmfinn~ NO ~ cl Inm tetl I d ~ ct d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create oblecbonable odors affecting a substantial O O O (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The proposed protect is consistent wdh the General Pian far which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) Dunng the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-speafic basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Crty verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 7 Less 7nan SIpNfi®nt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fatenbally Signifignl With MlUgabm Tnan 5lgnfinnt No I a Into lee i a i a 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the trine of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (r.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sort stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction au quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM,o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Ovemding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented FL54' r~ ~J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 8 Less Than SiBnifinnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Falanhally Sgrufionl wtn A4hgdYm Than S,9~finnl No I tl In ted I C I cl 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated \_J 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service rJ -a<- ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 9 Less Than S,pnficant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Fotmaally Signficanl Wih lNaga00n Than Sigrsfi®nt No I C In tetl I n I h c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, veinal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites9 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O (/) O ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The pro/ect site is located in an area developed with residential uses According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matonty of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are 19 trees from 9 different speaes on the protect site that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance Tree speaes include the following White Birch, Canyon Live Oak, Mexican Fan Palm, Silk Tree, Floss Silk Tree, Pinon Pine, Eucelyptus, Chinese Elm, and London Plane Tree All of the trees were evaluated by a certified arborist for health and the viability of relocation According to arborist, 16 trees are not suitable candidates for preservation or relocation due to one or more of the following reasons decline in health and close proximity of trunks However, 3 trees, consisting of a Canyon Live Oak, Floss Silk Tree and a London Plane Tree are in good physiological condition and are candidates for preservation/relocation The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) Trees identified by the arbarist report as #s 2, 6, and 19 shall be preserved on- site by relocation. The trees shall be identified and tagged prior to commencing grading. The trees shall remain side-boxed for a minimum of 120 days, or as recommended by a certified ~r~i~ ~ The trees shall receive on-going /h lU~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1690S and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 10 Leis Than Sipruficant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mtligaeon Than Sigmfitanl No I ad Inco iM I C I C maintenance during the construction period and for a minimum of 3 years after being replanted. The trees shall be replanted into an area where they can be maintained free from other landscape elements within the project. No sprinkler over-spray can be allowed to the trees. 2) The remaining 16 trees from various species shall be removed and replaced at a 1:1 ratio, minimum 15-gallon size, species and location subject to City Planner approval during the Landscape Plan Check f) The pro/ect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) sigmficance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological O (/) O ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O O (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The prolect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There are four wood-framed structures with stucco exterior, three of which that will be demolished with the prolect Two of the structures are single-family dwelling units that were constructed circa late 1950's/early 1960's One of the single-family dwelling units has substantial fire and water damage, and the remaining single-family dwelling unit is presently in habitable condition The two other structures are accessory buildings and are in need of minor repair None of the four structures are examples of architecture or craftsmanship that was once common and is now rare, nor are noteworthy examples of a particular architectural period or style The prolect design includes preserving, In place, the house located on Baker Avenue There will be no impact with the demolition of the remaining three structures b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take a ropria a measures to protect or preserve ~'.~s~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PMenhally Significant Wlih MIIIWacn man Sgnifiranl No I C Inco letl 1 d I d them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupte~ y copst~iction of infrastructure and surrounding J C~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 _ Page 12 Less Than Signifiranl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenhally Slgnifiont WAN MNgaAOn Than Sigmfipnt No I acl Inco oraletl I c! I d developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse Impacts are anticipated ~~ u 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings U (~) U ( ) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, including O O U (~) liquefaction Iv) Landslides? O O O (~) b) Result in substantial sod erosion or the loss of topsoils () (~) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (~) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table O O O (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (~) of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water Comments a) The protect site is located within the Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR A geotechnical report was prepared for the protect site by MTC Engineering The report indicates that the site may be subject to very strong ground shaking due to the proximity of a seismically active area even though no active or potentially active faults pass through the site The report indicates that seismically induced settlement will not occur at the densely compacted silty sand/sandy gravel where the footings will be founded The report states that the probability of ground cracking due to ground shaking is low, and the site is not located within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone as identified by the State of California In conclusion, the report states that the protect site is suitable for the proposed development, provided that the recommendations of the report are properly incorporated into design and are implemented during construction The mitigation measures listed below shall be implemented The Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 0 miles north of the protect site These faults are both capable of producing M„. 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto ~i ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 13 Lea Than Signlfiwnl Lea Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially s,g„fimrn Wih pLfi~fiM Than Signifieanl No I h In iM I tl I d Fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes is 10 0 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeastedy of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Unrform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant 1) All recommendations from the geotechnical engineering investigation by MTC Engineering, Inc., dated September 11, 2003, shall be incorporated into the working drawings submitted for plan check and implemented during construction. b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, the development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- signrficant levels 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- slte. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist primarily of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association, according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These sods are typically excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods Slopes are typically 0 to 9 percent The runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types onsite consist primarily of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods Slopes are typically 0 to 9 percent Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight No adverse impacts are anticipated /l ~o~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 14 Less Than Sigrafimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigmfirant with Mitigation Than Sigmfiwnl No I C Into tetl I a<I I ad e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area 11 For a protect wthin the vicindy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildtands~ Comments a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Muiti-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or . waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service ~/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 15 Less Then Sipnlfiont Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g votentalir Signlfiwnl wltn Millgahon men Signifirant No I tl Inco IeE I d I tl Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels, will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located approximately within a 1/4 mile of the nearest existing school Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) • The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wtldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () (/) () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (/) () ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site • J .1- ~J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 16 Less Than Sipnifirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotenlWlly semfimnt with M,tlpa0on man Sign,firenl No I acl Inc led I C I d d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially Increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff In a manner which would result In flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (~) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quallty~ () () () (~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) which would Impede or redirect flood flows I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of O O O (~) loss, Intury or death Involving flooding, Including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O U (~) Comments' a) Water and sewer service Is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California Is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an Industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Ouallty Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activdies, including site clearance and grading Develop and Implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the Intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs ~~ / -~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 17 Less Than Signifimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenllally Signifiont win MNgabon T1,an SigMfinnl No I d In te0 I d I a Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect far new development or significant redevelopment requires an National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-constructicn operational management of stone water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by Pinewave Design and Engineering, that identifies (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system Best Management Practices include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, ail/get separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm • water effluent Construction Activities 1) Priar to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) SD-10 Site Design and Landscape Planning Slopes/open space within the project area will be vegetated with ar~ss, plants, and trees in order to -,~ ~ (~, C Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 18 Less Than Sigruficanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially 9gnficant Waft MNgafign Than Sgrvficanl No Irtpact Incoryaatetl Irtpacl Impaa maximize infiltration and slow down the run-off from open space towards private access roads, so that pollutant can be filtered from surface water. 6) SD-11 Roof Runoff: Control Downspout will be used to collect all the roofwater to a single collection point, which is desirable for allowing infiltration. For instance, planter area around the residential building structures can be a proper place for downspout discharge. 7) SD-12 Efficient Irrigation: Timer, ram-triggered shutoff device, flow reducers will be installed in the pro/ect irrigation system so as to control potential excessive irrigation water spilling over the surface. Plus, landscape areas at the frontages of the two main entrances (Arrow Route and Baker Avenue) can help reducing run-off quantity towards public streets rightof-way. 8) SD-13 Storm Drain Signage: Stencil sign of "NO DUMPING -DRAINS TO OCEAN" will be placed at each of the on-site curb inlet catch basins in order to alert the public about the prohibitation against waste disposal. 9) MP-52 Dram Inserts. KRISTAR fossil filter inserts (curb mounted), or engineer approved equal devices, will be installed at each of the on-site inlet catch basins in order to remove organic sediments and debris Regular maintenance will be carved out by the Homeowners' Association (HOA) to make sure the fossil filters are functioning properly throughout the rainy season. Post- Construction Operational 10) The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Plnewave Design and Engineering to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 11) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Pians for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins Cucamonga Valley Water Department has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed pro/ect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 19 Less Than S19Nfi,ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenllally Signifieanl Wlh Mlllpaeon 7Tan Sgnifionl No 1 tl Inc tea I n I d c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscepe proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered signfcant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of Surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticpated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 12) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and Identlfyfng BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 13) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Dlscharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. r~s~ r-1 -...~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 20 Lela Then Siprvfiwni Leae Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentlally S~gnifirani win MNgatlon Than Sgmfitant No I ci In tail I cl I aca g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, Takes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically diwde an established commumty~ O O U (`~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O O (~) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan O O O (~) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The applicant is proposing to construct 40 condominiums, and preserve one existing single-family home, integrating it into the prolect The 3 74 acres site is comprised of five parcels, with four wood-framed structures with stucco exterior, three of which that will be demolished with the prolect Two of the structures are single-family dwelling units that were constructed circa late 1950's/early 1960's One of the single-family dwelling units has substantial fire and water damage, and the remaining single-family dwelling unit is presently in habitable condition The two other structures are accessory buildings and are in need of minor repair None of the four structures are examples of architecture or craftsmanship that was once common and is now rare, nor are noteworthy examples of a particular architectural period or style' The prolect design includes preserving in place the house located on Baker Avenue To west are single-family homes, and to the north is a multi-family condominium prolect To the east are two single-family homes surrounded by vacant land, and to the south is an established single-family neighborhood The site is located approximately 300 feet west of Arrow Route and is characterized by residential F~~~ Inltlal Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 21 Less Than SlBniflmnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially SiBmfipnl W,N A4UBaUOn Than Signifimnl No i a to iea i a i a development and vacant land in all directions The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is Medium Residential The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any polices for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticpated c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, speafic plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the prolect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase m ambient noise O O O (/) levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the prolect vianity above Ieveis existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels ~;.~(~8 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Rewew DRC2003-00449 Page 22 r-1 f-~.~ ~~ sy~mmm Los Issues and Supporting Information Sources P01nitla1y so,vficsm `"" wuyaaon ~ s~a+fiwm W i i i~ i i f) For a protect within the vanity of a private airstrip, () () () (~) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments• a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards accordrng to General Plan Exhibit V-13 The protect site will be exposed to extenor noise levels greater than 60 dBA within 271 feet of Arrow Highway Accordingly, an acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed by Eilar Associates, and the study concluded that units near the south property line, with frontage on Arrow Highway, wdl be exposed to extenor noise levels greater than 60 dBA The exterior noise level can be mitigated to less than 60 dBA with an 8-foot high concrete masonry wall constructed at the project's south property line The study concluded that with standard construction regwrements of the California Building Code, the proposed condos will meet the interior noise level requirements of 45 dBA or less The study further indicated that an interior noise analysis is necessary to determine the exact nature of the construction requirements The following mitigation measures listed below shall be implemented The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7), indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short- term noise impacts 1) An 8-foot high masonry wall will be constructed along the southern boundary of the project that fronts Arrow Route. 2) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques required. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property Ilne. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speufied in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. F1~ 6~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 23 Leis Tien Sigivfionl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Po""'°m 5,9nfiaml mN MN~eOn ~" Siprvficant No i a in lea i a i a The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction egwpment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be requved 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mltlgation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensrtrve land uses or residential dwellings b) The proposed condominium residences uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) See a)response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect is located approximately over 3 5 miles northwesterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the Flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticpated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) direc0y (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The pro/ect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticpated b) The pro/ect sde contains one existing single-family home that will be preserved and integrated into the pro/ect design No adverse impact expected ~_~ / / -F~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 24 Less Than S~gnfiCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PotenWlly $igrvfipnt Whi MingahOn than Signifimnt No ~ cl In tea ~ C ~ d c) The protect site contains one .existing single-family home that will be preserved and integrated into the prolect design The remainder of the prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticpated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result m substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response Mmes or other performance oblechves for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (~) b) Police protechon~ O U O (~) c) Schools U O O (~) d) Parks O O O ('~) e) Other public faahhes~ O O O (~) Comments• ' a) The site, located lust west of Vineyard Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 5 miles from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities, or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park, is located less than 1 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (yS-e'ct~ijon 5 9 9), the protected increase in library F/-lam / Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 25 Less Than Sigrvfitani Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°""uany Signfirant w~U tAagafian ~" Significant No i a in tee i a i a space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulatroe impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the prolect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational faalities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or O O O ('~) require the construction or expansion of recreational faalities which might have an adverse physical effect on the envvonment? Comments' a) The site is m a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park, is located less than 1 mile from the prolect site Los Amigos Elementary School, located one block to the west, also provides playground facilities This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational faalities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See response a) above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (~) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacty ratio on roads, or congestion at mtersections)~ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change m location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (~) (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ • //.L/~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 26 Less Than SIBNficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pdenbafiy Signifipm win A4bgabon Tnan SiBnifipnl No I atl Inc tetl I C I d e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments' a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate 41 two-way, peak hour trips which is less than 250 two-way, peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 3 miles northwesterly miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool • parking, etc ) / J ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 27 Less man Sign,ficanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Slgnifiwnl vim MingaOOn man SlBnificant No i n inw lea i n i n 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expanslon of existing facddies, the construction of which could cause signficant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with suffiaent permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated ~J c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered sign cant • d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts t/o/about 60 percent of the total water l ~ ~`~ r1 L_J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 28 Less Than Significant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g a°~"~~any S,gmficant vnu, Mmgatlon T'"n sig~uficant N° i n ie lea i n i n consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are regwred for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet, 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet, 6) mixed use protect including one or more of the protects specified above, 7) any other protect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water regwred by a 500-dwelling unit protect, and 8) any protect thataccounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment is required when 1) a protect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) a protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a suffiaent water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve • this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacty No impacts are anbapated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anbapated / /~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 29 Less 71wi SlpNficenl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PO1en°a0y S,gNfimnl ""'" Mmgdbon ~° SignifiWnt N° I d In letl I cl I cl 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistor~/t b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments' a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is requred c) Development of the site under the proposed land use would not cause substantial adverse • effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once / /~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentatroe Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 30 construction activdies were completed The Initial Study identfed potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than sigmficant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Arbonst Report, John A Gonzalez, Certified Arborist WC-3526 (dated December 8, 2003) (/) Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, MTC Engineering, Inc (dated September 11, 2003) (/) Acoustical Analyis Report, Eilar Associates (dated November 17, 2003) r~~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 Page 31 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signatur~~~"~~/~~ Date 1~ ~ - O L-~ ~ O~ Print Name and Title ~~ /~ l 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaratron is being circulated /or public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Protect File No.: Development Review DRC2003-00449 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 Public Review Period Closes: March 23, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Pinewave Design and Engineering Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue - APN 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, and 32 Proiect Description: A request for a subdmsion of 41 condominwm units on 3 74 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), a review of site plan and elevations, and a request to allow an 8-foot high wall, where a maximum 6-foot height wall is permitted Related File Minor Exception DRC2004-0233 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mdigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review period. March 23 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By ~,.~'~9 RESOLUTION NO.OS-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908, A SUBDIVISION OF AIRSPACE FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ON 3.74 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DW ELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF BAKER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, AND 32 A. Recitals. 1 Pinewave Design and Engineenng filed an application forthe approval ofTentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application:' 2. On the 23rd day March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are We and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 3 74 acres of land, located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue, and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with condominwms and is zoned Medwm Residential, the properties to the south are developed with single-family homes and are zoned Low Residential and Medwm Residential, the property to the east is vacant and is zoned Low-Medium Residential and Medwm Residential, and the property to west is developed Hnth a single-family home and is zoned Medium Residential; and c. The application proposes the subdiwsion of air space for residential condominium purposes; and d. The application, in contunction with Development Review DRC2003-00449, proposes the development of 41 residential condominwms for sale purposes; and e The condominium subdivision will allow ownership of individual units and provide a type of housing product for a segment of the residential ~myarket, thereby increasing the amount of ~~ 8Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 2 for-sale condominium units m a region that has been identified to have a housing demand that is greater than the supply; and f. The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause senous public health problems; and • f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4. Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent iudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat / /~ 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 3 upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is forthe subdivision of air space for residential condominium purposes for a 3.74 acre site located on the following APNs. 0207-591-22, 25, 26, 28, 31, and 32. 2) All pertinent condibons of approval for Development Review DRC2003-00449 shall apply. 3) Reciprocal maintenance agreement ensunng joint maintenance of all landscape areas, common areas, dnves and parking areas shall be recorded pnor, or concurrent with, the final map 4) An easement granting access to Assessor's Parcel Nos 0207-591-33, 34, and 35 for emergency access purposes upon development shall be recorded pnor to final map approval or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first Engineenng Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City Major Artenal standards including include curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, a commercial dnve approach, street trees, traffic signs, and striping. 2) BakerAvenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City Collector Street standards including removal and replacing three existing dnveways with curb and gutter and/or commeroial drive approach, asphalt pavement, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights, street trees, traffic signs, and stnping. a) Sidewalk shall be constructed from the northerly tract boundary to the southerly boundary of the logging area parcel 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncel) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage on Arrow Route F .~ ga PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 4 4) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergroundrng of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Baker Avenue shall be paid to the City pnor to the approval of the final map or issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontages on Baker Avenue (APNs: 0207-591-22 and 26). 5) Transitions to existing pavements on both east and west of the protect boundary on Arrow Route shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the tentative tract map application does not follow current WQMP templates/gwdance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for New Development and Redevelopment Projects at http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb8/html/sb_wgmp.html. This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed. Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided. Also, include the Best Management Plans (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficaUon. 2) Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Conractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. F,~g3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 5 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares oroccurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the Ume of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use. 10) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. ~; ~g~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 6 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnppmg. Bio/og~cal Resources 1) Trees identified by the arbonst report as #s 2, 6, and 19 shall be preserved on-site by relocation. The trees shall be identified and tagged prior to commencing grading. The trees shall remain side-boxed for a minimum of 120 days, or as recommended by a certified arbonst. The trees shall receive on-going maintenance dunng the construction pencil and for a minimum of 3 years after being replanted. The trees shall be replanted into an area where they can be maintained free from other landscape elements within the protect. No spnnkler over-spray can be allowed to the trees. 2) The remaining 16 trees from vanous speaes shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio, minimum 15-gallon size, speaes and location subtect to City Planner approval dunng the Landscape Plan Check. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropriate CECA gwdelmes. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with ongmal illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~/ -Y "_' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • March 23, 2005 Page 7 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) All recommendations from the geotechnical engineering investigation by MTC Engineering, Inc, dated September 11, 2003, shall be incorporated into the working drawings submitted for plan check and implemented during construction. 2) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) ~, -~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 8 that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction acUwUes entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the Ume of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods expenenced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site. 5) SD-10 Site Design 8 Landscape Planning: Slopes/open space within the pro/ect area wdl be vegetated with grass, plants, and trees in order to maximize infiltration and slow down the run-off from open space towards pnvate access roads, so that pollutant can be filtered from surface water. 6) SD-11 Roof Runoff: Control Downspout wdl be used to collect all the roofwater to a single collection point, which is desirable for allowing infiltration. For instance, planter area around the residential budding sUuctures can be a proper place for downspout discharge. 7) SD-12 Efficient Irrigation. Timer, rain-tnggered shut-off device, flow reducers will be installed in the project irngation system so as to control potential excessive irrigation water spilling over the surface. Plus, landscape areas at the frontages of the two main entrances (Arrow Route and Baker Avenue) can help reducing run-off quantity towards public streets right-0f-way 8) SD-13 Stomt Drain Signage• Stencil sign of "NO DUMPING- DRAINS TO OCEAN" will be placed at each of the on-site curb inlet catch basins in order to alert the public about the prohibitation against waste disposal. 9) MP-52 Dram Inserts. KRISTAR fossil filter inserts (curb mounted), or engineer approved equal devices, will be installed at each of the ~~-~ 8~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 9 on-site inlet catch basins in order to remove organic sediments and debns. Regular maintenance will be tamed out by the Homeowners' Association (HOA) to make sure the fossil filters are functioning properly throughout the rainy season 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Pinewave Design and Engineenng to reduce pollutants after consVuction entering the stone drain system to the maximum extent practical 11) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides. landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits 12) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will beused on-site to reduce pollutants into • the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 13) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Boanf Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General ConsVuction Permit. Noise 1) An 8-foot high masonry wall will be consVucted along the southern boundary of the pro/ect that fronts Arrow Route 2) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of building pertnits. The final report shall discuss the level of intenor noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the budding matenals and construction techniques regwred. The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures . contained in the final report. / /~ 00 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 10 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speafied in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitonng at other times may be regwred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offical within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 5) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase. 6) Haul Vuck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any . time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Macias, Chainnan ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby • certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: F~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-21 SUBTT16908 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING • March 23, 2005 Page 11 AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~~ -.~' 9~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance ofthe conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~,~9/ Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 Development Review DRC2003-00449 and Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The project planneror responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Ddepartmentshall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits F-~9a MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT16908 and DRC2003-00449 Applicant: Pinewave Design and Engineering Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: November 15.2004 • r,~ uai~i .. ~ ~ ~. All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Rewew of Plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specificetions Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall prowde evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be util¢ed, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 , Paints and coatings shall be applied edher by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply month SCAOMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Adddionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site g0 C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 throw h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. g0 C Rewew of Plans AIC 2/4 ~ gl~ .. .. ~ .. • .. . .. • Phase grading to prevent the suscepbbdity of large g0 C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended nods of time. • Schedule activdies to mirnm¢e the amounts of g0 C Rewew of Plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work erlods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in B0 C Revlevv of Plains A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn ractices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established B0 C by the City rf silt is carried over to ad/agent public Review of Plans A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the bme of year of construction • Suspend grading operations durng high Mnnds (i e., g0 C wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance wdh Rewew of Plans A 4 Rule 403 re uirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods g0 C haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Rewew of Plans A 4 swtable means The sde shall be treated vnth water or other BO C Rewew of Plans AIC 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and F Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB)) daily J to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordancevwth SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall uttlize electnc or clean BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercal structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporete high efficiency/low polluting heating, av conditioning, appliances and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping t S 2 of 9 .. . . .. . . . . .. ... .. . - ., .. . . '~IOIbgN u ~ eSbU Trees identified by the arborist report as #s 2, 6, and 19 CP B/C Review of A/C 2/4 shall be preserved on-site by relocation. The trees shall plans/During be identified and tagged prior to commencing grading construction The trees shall remain side-boxed for a minimum of 120 days, or as recommended by a cert~ed arbonst The trees shall receive on-going maintenance during the construction period and for a minimum of 3 years after being replanted The trees shall be replanted into an area where they can be maintained free from other landscape elements within the pro/ect No sprinkler over-spray can be allowed to the trees The remaining 16 trees from various species shall be CP B/C Review of AIC Z4 replaced at a 1 1 ratio, minimum 15-gallon size, speces plans/During and location subject to City Planner approval during the construction Landscape Plan Check rCijtur`al_~,ResouPces'x`g~ ~ °' ` ~lk` xa~~~,{;r~.~- "" ~ w+'1 ~uv v-.<,a'sm~uC'rk.:~:i-rTti,. d~Y..Jhvf~ ~•4kY .. n.v___s~< .. ti sa.,L'.~.. r pF~~~y °~" ,~t. ~*J~~ ,.r~.:..~it- 4 "` ~~R,~, ,r ,,~~Rqq .S`~~Fi^F /a] f~~f ~2.~ ~~,~.'F~'~~?-, ~ ~ /IlLH }~e.~prt}h'R ~'< l R ~~ l{{44~~~~{{~~;;.~ ~~jjyy!!$$~~~p ,-+ h.1.~eJi.Ci~)~"- '1{~, .~~ ~ r, -, xn y ~*i~ `T ~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developervnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study Wdh the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mdigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Report effects on sign cent, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA uidelines `1 ~' i 3~ {y s ... . . . ... . • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources vnthm the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report wdh , onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County i Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP g Review ~ p~ field survey of the pro/ect sde The paleontologist shall Report 4 submit a report of findings that Nell also provide specrfic recommendations regarding further md~gation measures (i e , paleontological mon~tonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation mondoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological morntor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report mwmal construction delay, to the site full-time dunn the interval of earth-disturbm activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and note the morntor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to the San Bemardmo County Museum ~ `'(3e~ogi a`~d"Soils ~'. ;'~ -" , ~ „ , ~ .~ w3 a aa.. .r ,..~_ c ~ , All recommendations from the geotechmcel engineering BO/CE C Dunng AIC 4 Investigation by MTC Engineering, Inc , dated ConsWction September 11, 2003, shall be incorporated into the working drawings submitted for plan check and implemented dunng construction The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A 4 sod-stabdiz~ng agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 .,p 4 of 9 ~ ~. . .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated Nnth vehiGe tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to mmimtze PM,o emissions Construction from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction ConsWction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions n~~ 4 ate'r~Qua~itjl ".~ '~~ ° , ~H~rol°9~' ~' '"'` ~!~d~ ' '~l ~, , k, ; ;~ ~ ~' .r: , ., a -x ,'~ '., ti „ , . <; v . Prior to issuance of grading pennRs, the permk applicant BO B/C/D Revew of Plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to Building Offiaal far approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speck measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specdy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern Caldomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be inGuded to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specdied time frame During construction, temporary berms such as CE/BO B/C/D Review of A/C y4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent Plans/Dunng construction discharge of debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff ~ J 5~ • s ~ • ... . ... .. .. ... .. . . During construction, to remove pollutants, street CE B/C/D Review of A/C 2/4 Leaning Hnll be performed prwr to storm events and PlanslDunng after the use of water Wcks to control dust in order to construction prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site SD-10 Site Design and Landscape Planning. CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Slopeslopen space within the protect area Hnll be vegetated Huth grass, plants, and trees in order to maxim¢e infiltration and slow down the run-off from open space towards private access roads, so that pollutant can be filtered from Surface water SD-11 Roof Runoff Control Downspout will be used to CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 collect all the roofwater to a single collection point, which is desvable for allowing infiltration For instance, planter area around the residential bwlding structures can be a proper place for downspout discharge SD-12 Efficient Irngahon Timer, rain-triggered shut-off CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 device, flow reducers will be installed in the protect irrigation system so as to control potential excessive irrigation water spilling over the surface Plus, landscape areas at the frontages of the 2 main entrances (Arrow Route and Baker Avenue) can help reducing run-off quantity towards public streets right-of-way SD-13 Storm Drain Signage Stencil sign of "NO CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 DUMPING -DRAINS TO OCEAN" will be placed at each of the on-site curb inlet catch basins in order to alert the public about the prohibitation against waste disposal MP-52 Drain Inserts KRISTAR fossil filter inserts (curb CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 mounted), or engineer approved equal devices, will be installed at each of the on-site inlet catch basins in order to remove organic sediments and debris Regular maintenance will be carried out by the Homeowners' Association (HOA) to make sure the fossil filters areb functioning properly throughout the rainy season ~ 6of9 .. . .. . . . .. .. . The developer shall implement the BMPs identrfied in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Pinewave Design and Engineering) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practice) Landscaping plans shall inGude provisions for CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimmng the use of fertilizers/pesticidesRierbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permds Prior to issuance of budding permds, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, ncuding a protect description and identdying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural ~ measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/GD Review of plans AIC 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply wrath obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Ident~cetion Number) shall be submtted to the City Bwiding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Perinit se ' ,~~ ~, n ~~ An t3-foot high masonry wall well be constructed along CP C/D Review of A/C/D 2,3 the southern boundary of the pro/ect that fronts Arrow Plans/During Highway. Construction • ~ ~ • • ~• .. ', .. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City BO/CP C/D Review of AIC/D 2,3 Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of Plans/During building permits The final report shall discuss the level Construction of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the budding materials and construction techniques requved The bwlding plans vnll be checked for conformance wdh the mtigation measures contained in the final report Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During q 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any hme on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During q q standards specrfied in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hve a consultant to pertortn weekly noise level momtonng as specked in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Budding Offiaal Said consultant shall report then findings to the Bwldmg Official vnthin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above ~ standards, then the consultant shall immediately notrfy the Bwldmg Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction ac4wties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in first phase. Construction Haul Wck deliveries shall not take place between the POBO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction inctuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. C 8of9 Key to Checktiat Abbrovlatlons CDD - Communky DevebpmeM Director A - WMh Each New Developmerrt A - On-ske Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map or designee CP -City Planner or designee B - Prbr To Constructan B -Other Agenq Permit / Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C - Threughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Otfidal or designee D - On Completbn D - 9eper~St6rrtCal(FZapos) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or des nee E - O retlng 5 -Retain Deposk or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 8 -Revoke CUP 7 - ClfaBon \11 0 9~ i u COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908 SUBJECT: 41 UNIT CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF AIRSPACE APPLICANT: PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING LOCATION: APNs: 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 AND 26, 0207-591-28, AND 0207-591-31 AND 32 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court vests and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partic~pahon shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT16908 is granted subject to the approval of Development Review DRC2003-00449 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-21, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file m the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. F~'/off Comolehon Date // / / / / / / / / Prgect No SUBTT16908 Comolehon Date D. E. 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~ 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Cade, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permd issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits La ndscaping 1 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilivng, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency wdh any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 3 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including mondoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $474 00 prior to the issuance of bwldrng permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and reporton the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forted s Fib ~~~. Protect No SUBTT16908 Comole6on Date F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 50 total feet on Arrow Route 33 total feet on Baker Avenue 3 Reaprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 4 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public rightof-way shall be dedicated to the City H. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Counal Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bulding service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Counal, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development -/-/- / / / / / / / / -/-/ -/-/- / / / / 3 F~ ~o~ Protect No SUBTT16906 Comolehon Date Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limped to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Arrow Route X X X X X X Baker Avenue X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to Clty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal far first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program -/-~ / / / / / / -/_~ / I / / / / / / / / ~ /0~ Prgect NO SUBTT16908 Comoletion Date 6 Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon Feld conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size Qty Arrow Route Liquidambar NCN 8 ft 25 ft oc 15-gal Fill-in styraciflua "Palo Alto" Formal on alternating wide side of meandering sidewalk Baker Avenue Pistacia chinensi Chinese Pistache 5 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient defiaenaes may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as requred J. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas K. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the / / -~ / / / / / / / / / -/-/- / / Fib l0 ~ Prgecl No SUBTT16908 Comole6on Date Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from • the CVWD is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects. 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them L. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Cdy, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance rf no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 6 ~,..~1D ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS September 29, 2004 Pinewave N/S Arrow, W/O Baker DRC2003-00449 and SUBTT16908 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants mcommercial/industnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire • hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet. c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the extenor wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet e Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible w As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A mirnmum of forty-feet (40') from any budding . f If any portion of a facility or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided ~-~~~g g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow • The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minmum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with 13R with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1. 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Fire protection water supply plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water supply plans are approved. 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Multifamily structures greater than 7,500 square feet Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwlding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bwldin~ permit must be obtained Plans and speafications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Service in accordance month RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 2 F,~i~ FSC-6 Fire District Site Access 1 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, • streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 2 Location of Access All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 3 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside tum radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent • h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 4 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 5 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred budding exterior openings. 6 Residential gates installed across Fire Distract access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design regwrements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Dewces shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and speafications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adtacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fads to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex 3 r/ ~ll ~ The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site pla~ illustrabng the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is requred with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically descnbed below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Compressed Gases Public Assembly Cryogenics LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Flammable and Combustible Liquids Welding and Cutting Operations Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino • The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materals Division at (909) 387631 for forms and assistance The County Fue Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous matenals disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased propertv which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in venting stating that the business is sub/ect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous matenals in accordance with the 20 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards a ~.rf~~ FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 revew fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement• The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subtect to the agreement A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adiacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The 5 f ~ ~~pZ agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of Sa~ Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness th hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the publi~ water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location s ~~ l13 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed spnnkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire spnnkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system (subiect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service. Fire Alarm System. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10 Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercal and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 11 Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements 12 Hazardous Materials• Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services ~F,.~I1~ 13 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building o~ property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 14 Mapping Site Plan. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/s' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. r1 r1 8 F,.~ !lS' • RESOLUTION NO.05-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 41 CONDOMINIUM UNITS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16908 IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DW ELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF BAKER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-591-22, 0207-591-25 AND 26, 0207-591-28 AND 0207-591-31 AND 32. A Rentals. 1. Pmewave Design and Engmeenng filed an application for Development Review DRC2003-00449, the design review of 41 condominwm units forTentative Tract Map SUBTT16908, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution an: true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Arrow Highway, approximately 300 feet west of Baker Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 164 feet on Baker Avenue, and approximately 196 feet on Arrow Route, and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with condominiums and is zoned Medwm Residential, the properties to the south are developed with single-family homes and are zoned Low Residential and Medwm Residential, the property to the east is vacant and is zoned Low-Medium Residential and Medwm Residential, and the property to west is developed with a single-family home and is zoned Medium Residential; and c. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mfunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and F~II~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING . March 23, 2005 Page 2 d. The applicant conducted two neighborhood meetings on November 29, 2004, and December 13, 2004, to inform surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback. Each meeting was attended by approximately 15 residents; and e. The project design meets or exceeds the Basic Development Standards for setbacks, building separations, and recreational amenities, and f. The design and exterior materials of the condommwm units mwrporates horizontal wood siding, decorative knee braces, stacked stone, shutters, divided light windows and corbels, thereby, providing 360-degree architectural treatment, a goal of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed protect is consistent with the obiectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially iniunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negabve Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows. In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat F,1~i'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING . March 23, 2005 Page 3 upon which wildl'rfe depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Department 1) Plans submitted for plan check shall be consistent with plans approved by the Design Review Committee on January 18, 2005 2) Where utilized, decorative metal railings at balconies shall be more than lust a straight picket style Plans submitted for plan check shall indicate vanation in the decorative metal railings. 3) The existing single-story home on BakerAvenue that will be preserved and integrated into the protect shall have the following enhancements: 1) Wood siding shall be added under the gables on the north, east, and west elevations; 2) Ledgestone shall be added as base treatment on the north, east, and west elevations; 3) The dwelling unit shall be painted to match the color scheme of the proposed condominium units and 4) The existing windows, front door, garage door shall be changed to match the condos 4) The entryways off Baker Avenue and Arrow Highway shall have landscape planters, stacked stone plasters, and a stacked stone perimeterwall The final design shall be subtect to City Planner revew and approval during plan check. 5) The entryways off Baker Avenue and Arrow Highway shall have decorative pavement. The decorative entryways shall have colored concrete, with score Imes m a diamond pattern, and a concrete border. The final design of the entryways shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval during plan check. 6) The interior walls on either side of thejoggmg and walking area leading to the pedestnan connection at Baker Avenue shall be stucco to blend with the condominium units. Final design of interior walls shall be subject to City Planner review and approval dunng plan check. 7) The interior walls along the intenor road opposite Unds 9, 13, 15, and 17 shall step down and tie into the existing walls along either side of . the togging and pedestnan tral that connects to Baker Avenue. The final design shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval dunng plan check. F~/!~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 4 8) The design of the fresco at the north elevation on the pool house shall be subject to City Planner review and approval during plan check. 9) Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limded to, wrought iron and plastic 10) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real or native fieldstone. Other forms of stone may be manufactured products. 11) The project will be developed according to the approved Site Plan and corresponding Exterior and Intenor Noise Analysis for the protect site, adhering to all regwrements of the Noise Analysis. Replotting of the condos will require additional interior noise analysis to be performed in order to demonstrate that the houses will meet the City's Intenor Noise Standards. 12) To prevent erosion and runoff in the slopes in the landscape planters near the underground garages, a retaining wall shall be installed in the landscape planters on both sides of each ramp leading to the underground garages on Plan 2's. 13) Tree Removal Perirnt DRC2004-00232 is hereby approved for the removal of 16 trees for the development of the site. The applicanUdeveloper shall be required to remove and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Numbers 1 and 2 under Biological Resources listed below. The Tree Removal Permit shall be valid for 90 days from the date of final map recordation for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. Enoineerina Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Ma~orArtenal"standards including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, a commercial drive approach, street Uees, traffic signs, and striping. 2) BakerAvenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Collector Street" standards including removal and replacing three existing driveways with curb and gutter and/or commercial drive approach, asphalt pavement, curvtlinear sidewalk, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, street trees, traffic signs, and striping. a) Sidewalk shall be constructed from the northerlytract boundaryto the southerly boundary of the dogging area parcel. 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever ~l ~l9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 5 occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the pro/ect frontage on Anow Route. 4) An in-lieu fee as contnbution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Baker Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the final map or issuance of bwldmg permits, whichever occurs first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontages on Baker Avenue (APNs 0207-591-22 and 007-591-26). 5) Transitions to existing pavements on both east and west of the project boundary on Arrow Route shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the tentative tract map application does not follow current WOMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for New Development and Redevelopment Protects at http.//www.swrcb.ca.gov/nvgcb8/html/sb_wgmp.html. This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and punted. Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided. Also, include the Best Management Plans (BMPs) identified m the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check Environmental MiUOation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff • 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. F,L Sao PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 6 4) Ali asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the consVuction site through seeding and watenng. • Pave or apply gravel toany on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adiacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the Ume of year of construction. Suspend grading operations dunng high words (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction conVactor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction conVactor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shutoff equipmentwhen not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. ~ ~ /a I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 7 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping B~o/ogical Resources 1) Trees identified by the arbonst report as #s 2, 6, and 19 shall be preserved on-site by relocation The trees shall be identified and tagged pnor to commencing grading. The trees shall remain side-boxed for a minimum of 120 days, or as recommended by a certified arbonst. The trees shall receive ongoing maintenance dunng the construction penod and for a minimum of 3 years after being replanted The trees shall be replanted into an area where they can be maintained free from other landscape elements within the protect. No sprinkler over-spray can be allowed to the trees. 2) The 16 trees from vanous species shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio, minimum 15-gallon size, species and location subject to City Planner approval dunng the Landscape Plan Check. Guttural Resouroes • 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl: • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeGal qualdies as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original tllustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~l /a ~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 8 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological morntonng) that may be appropnate. Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found wdhin an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading conVactor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils 1) All recommendations from the geotechrncal engineering investigation by MTC Engineering, Inc., dated September 11, 2003, shall be incorporated into the working drawings submitted for plan check and implemented dunng construction. 2) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 5) Chemicel soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology . 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Offiaal for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) ~~/a3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 9 that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the Ume of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy penods expenenced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this pro/ect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site. 5) SD-10 Site Design & Landscape Planning• Slopes/open space within the pro/ect area will be vegetated with grass, plants, and trees in order to maximize infiltration and slow down the run-off from open space towards private access roads, so that pollutant can be filtered from surface water. 6) SD-11 Roof Runoff. Control Downspout will be used to collect all the roofwater to a single collection point, which is desirable for allowing infiltration For instance, planter area around the residential budding structures can be a proper place for downspout discharge. 7) SD-12 Efficient Imgation: Timer, rain-triggered shut-off device, flow reducers will be installed in the pro/ect imgaUon system so as to control potential excessive imgation water spilling over the surface Plus, landscape areas at the frontages of the two main entrances (Arrow Route and Baker Avenue) can help reduang run-off quantity towards public streets nght-of-way. 8) SD-13 Stonn Drain Signage. Stencil sign of "NO DUMPING- DRAINS TO OCEAN" will be placed at each of the on-site curb inlet catch . basins in order to alert the public about the proh~bitation against waste disposal. 9) MP-52 Drain Inserts. KRISTAR fossil filter inserts (curb mounted), or engineer approved equal devices, will be installed at each of the F~ ~a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 10 on-site inlet catch basins in order to remove organic sediments and debris. Regular maintenance will be tamed out by the Homeowners' Assoaation (HOA) to make sure the fossil filters are functioning properly throughout the rainy season 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Pinewave Design and Engineering to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 11) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 12) Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including apro/ect description and idenUfytng BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 13) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the appl~cent shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldng Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) An 8-foot high masonry wall wtll be consUucted along the southern boundary of the pro/ect that fronts Arrow Route 2) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of bwlding permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques required. The bwlding . plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. ~-~ ~a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 11 3) ConsVuction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Offcal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then consVuction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any Ume on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit• /~~a<o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-22 DRC2003-00449 - PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING March 23, 2005 Page 12 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~j ~ ~ o~ / ~...J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 and Development Review DRC2003-00449 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. . 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the proiect. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance ofthe conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation vv~ll be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Crvic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 F~~as~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16908 Development Review DRC2003-00449 and Page 2 3. Appropnate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs rs needed, as determined by the project planneror responsible City department, to monitor speGfic mitigation acfivites and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the protect planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Fonn. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forns for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring wrll be signed off as completed by the proiect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Fonn. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The pro/ect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Forth will be completed by the proiect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The proiect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors rf compliance with any aspects of the MMP is notoccumng afterwritten noUficeUon has been issued. The proiect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that requre mondonng after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Ddepartinent shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff Ume to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the Crty with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the Crty. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. ~~~a9 • ~ s MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Mac SUBTT16908 and DRC2003-00449 Applicant: Pinewave Desilan and Engineering Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: November 15.2004 `~I ~1J .. . . .. . . . . ~ ... . -. . .. ~al ~ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating conddion so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specficetions Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verfication Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPBO C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Qualdy Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted rn SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equpment shall wmply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site B0 C Review of Plans AIC 2~4 throw h seedin and watenn • Pave or apply gravel to any on-sde haul roads. B0 C Review of Plans A/C 2~4 1 of 9 .- .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large g0 C Review of Plans AIC Z4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time. • Schedule aGiwties to minimize the amounts of g0 C Review of Plans A/C ?J4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work enods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material fn g0 C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineenn ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established g0 C Review of Plans A 4 by the Cdy ff silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high woods (i e , g0 C Review of Plans A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance wdh Rule 403 re uirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils g0 C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means The site shall be treated wdh water or other BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 soil-stabdmng agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW QCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ~ Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Review of Plans AIC 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The censtruGion contractor shall util¢e eleGnc or Gean BO C Review of Plans AIC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construGwn wntraGor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans inGude a statementthatwork crews will shut off equpment when not in use All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C y4 regwred to incorporate high efficiencyllow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. All residential and cemmeraal structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C y4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnp~ ~ 2 oti ~ i .. . ... ... . .. ." .. .... . . . .. :.. 0 Trees ident~ed by the arbonst report as #s 2, 6, and 19 CP B/C Review of A/C 2/4 shall be preserved on-site by relocation The Vees shall plans/Dunng be identfied and tagged prior to commenting grading constuctlon The Vees shall remain side-boxed for a minimum of 120 days, or as recommended by a cert~fed arbortst The Vees shall receive on-going maintenance dunng the construction period and for a minimum of 3 years after being replanted The Vees shall be replanted into an area where they can be maintained free from other landscape elements wthin fhe protect No sprinkler over-spray can be allowed to the Vees The remaining 16 Vees from various species shall be CP B/C Review of A/C 2/4 replaced at a 1 1 ratio, minimum 15-gallon size, speces plans/Dunng and location subtect to City Planner approval dunng the construction Landscape Plan Check ~j~±;//y~~~/ ~M,yy~ppySS ~~ff ~v K ultu ° I)Resou~~y V~ ~ 1".. !t ' nt~~ ' ` ~' ~ 5 }Y ~ " " 4r..h T Vhii{Ipil 4 ~u2 w CM .3V If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer Nall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction aclrvdies, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 sties from demolition or sign~icent modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo icel value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sties within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal oint • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of AID 314 archaeological heritage Report ^ Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources,fotloNnng appropriate CEG+A guidelines p~ t-' 3of9 . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiwn A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstnxtion CP B Rewew of A/D 4 freld survey of the protect sde. The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that vwll also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e , paleontological mondonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological momtor, trained and CP B Rewew of AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils vwth Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunn the interval of earth-disturbin activities • Should fossils be found vnthin an area being deared BO BIC Review of AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing adiwties Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the ~ grading contractor should immediately divert construction and note the momtor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Rewew of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens vinth a Report copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum `°"~° o is t k All recommendations from the geotechmcal engineering BO/CE C During AIC 4 investlgatlon by MTC Englneering, Inc , dated Construction September 11, 2003, shall be incorporated into the working dravnngs submitted for plan check and implemented during construction The site shall be treated month water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 4 Ot~ ~. .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the Cdy to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated wrath vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions ConsWction from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ~ ~- ~I.IjidrA o9Y and'nWate~'~QtY ~ y "~ ~ ^ ' *: ~ r , .a ,.~ ~ r~ ~a,. « i . Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the pertnrt applicant BO B/C/D Revtew of Plans A/C Z4 shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical ~ An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 ~ grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern Caldomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be inGuded to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect well be corrected through a remediation or restoration program wnthm a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as CE/BO B/C/D Review of A/C ti4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent Plans/Dunng construction discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 1 5 of 9 • .. ... .. .- .. During consWctwn, to remove pollutants, street CE BICID Review of A/C 2/4 deaning vwll be performed prior to storm events and Plans/Dunng after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to construction prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site SD-10 Sde Design and Landscape Planrnng. CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 Slopeslopen space wnthin the protect area vnll be vegetated wrath grass, plants, and trees in order to maximize infiltration and slow down the run-off from open space towards private access roads, so that pollutant can be filtered from surface water. SD-11 Roof Runoff. Control Downspout wnll be used to CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 collect all the roofwater to a single collection point, which is desirable for allowing infiltration For instance, planter area around the residential budding sfrudures can be a proper place for downspout discharge SD-12 Efficient Irrigation Timer, rain-triggered shut-off CE BIC/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 device, flow reducers well be installed in the protect in'igation system so as to control potential excessive in'igation water spilling over the surface Plus, landscape areas at the frontages of the 2 main entrances (Arrow Route and Baker Avenue) can help reduang run-off quantity towards public streets right-of-way SD-13 Storm Drain Signage Stenal sign of "NO CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 DUMPING -DRAINS TO OCEAN" well be placed at `each of the on-sde curb inlet catch basins in order to alert the public about the prohibdation against waste disposal MP-52 Dram Iserts• KRISTAR fossil filter inserts (curb CE B/C/D Revew of Plans AIC 2/4 mounted), or engineer approved equal dewces, well be installed at each of the on-sde inlet catch basins in order to remove orgarnc sediments and debns Regular maintenance well be tamed out by the Homeowners' Association (HOA) to make sure the fossil filters areb functioning properly throughout the rainy season {~ `1 6 01~ .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Pinewave Design and Engineenng) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical CE B/C/D Review of Plans .. . AIC 2/4 Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE B/C/D Review of Plans AIC 214 controlling and minimmng the use of fertd¢ers/pestiadesRierbic~des Landscaped areas shall be morntored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, inGuding morntonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading pennds Pnor to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/Ci/D Review of Plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, inGuding a protect descnption and identifying BMPs that Nell be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The Q WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New '~ Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 N Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permds, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State W ater Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identficetion Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. An 8-foot high masonry wall wdl be constructed along CP C/D Review of AIC/D 2,3 the southern boundary of the protect that fronts Arrow Plans/Dunng Highway. Construction 7 of 9 . - ~. .. A final acousticel report shall be submitted for Cdy BOICP CID Review of AICID 2,3 Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of PlanslDunng bwldmg pertnds. The final report shall discuss the level Construction of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the budding materials and construction techniques required The bwldmg plans wdl be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng A 4 standards specrfied in Development Code Section Construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level mondonng as specked in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be requred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official wdhin 24 hours, however, d noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then consWction actNdaes shall be reduced ~ in intensity to a level of compliance wrath above noise ~ standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in first phase Construction Haul truck delrvenes shall not take place between the POGO C Dunng A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Construction rnctuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, rf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction srte), then the developer shall prepare a noise mdigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 8 t)~ • K.y to Chrreklist Abbrevtatlons CDD -Community Devebpment Director or designee A -With Each New DevebpmeM A - On-site Inspection 1 - Wlfhhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Budding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee BO -Building Official or des nee C -Throughout Construction D - On Completion C -Plan Check D - ~S~T~~) 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupan 4 -Stop Work Order PO - Pollce Captain or des nee FC -Fire Chief or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposk or Bonds 8 -Revoke CUP 7 - Chatlon `~1`1 `~ GJ oQ 9of9 `~~' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN* STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00449 SUBJECT: 41 CONDOMINIUM UNITS APPLICANT: PINEWAVE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING LOCATION: APNs. 0207-591-72, 0207-591-25, AND 26, 0207-591-28, AND 0207-591-31, AND 32 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Coin IeG n A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-22, Standard _/ /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_I_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained In accordance with the approved plans which Include /_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and wlors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/ /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 1 F,.~~39 Protect No DRC2003-00449 Comole4on Date 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and • State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 9 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 10 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonrywalis, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 11 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, including proper illumination 13 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Assocation shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 14 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' assocation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits 15 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice • requirements, special street posting, phone listing forcommunity concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing / / I / / I / / I / / / / / -/-/- / / / / / / / / I / ~~ -~ 14~ D. E. F Protect No DRC2003-00449 Completion Date 16 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_~ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect perimeter 17 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear properly lines), rather than _/_I_ wood fenang for permanence, durability, and design consistency 18 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 19 For multiple family development, laundry faalittes shall be provided as requved by the _/_/_ Development Code 20 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space _/_/_ shall be provided 21 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as regwred by the _/_/_ Development Code 22 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products Shopping Centers 1 Textured pavement shall be provided across arculation aisle and pedestrian walkway They shall _/_/_ be of bnckltile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of . bwiding permds 2 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures Bui lding Design 1 Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for City _/_/_ Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of bulding permits 2 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ pro/ections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans 3 For all residential development, provide conduit from each uniUlot and a pull box to connect to the _/_/_ street Provide interior structured wiring for each house/budding with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the bulding, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for City Planner and Bwlding Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts t f 11 f _I_~ ee a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum o wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk ad/scent to the parking stall (including curb) ~i~i Protect No DRC2003-00449 Comolefion Date 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across arculation aisles shall be provided / l / _/_/_ p azas throughout the development to connect dwellings/unitslbwldings with open spaces recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and ail driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per Ctty standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _I_/_ from back of sidewalk G. La ndscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within _/_/_ the pro/ect 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24-inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 4 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, vrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred bythis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _I_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, propertyowners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 8 Landscaping and urigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this pro/ect area shall be contrnuously maintained by the developer 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 4 ~J ~ ~Y'OS Protect N o DRC2003-00449 Comolehon Date 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _l~ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes pnor _/_/_ to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department pnor to issuance of budding permits I. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Ctty Adopted Special _I_/_ Studies Zone for the Red Hdl Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Ctty Planner, pnor to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $474 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used bythe City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigabon measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _l~ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEWIS) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (DRC2003-00449) clearly identified on the outside of all plans F~ ~ /~F3 Protect No DRC2003-00449 Comolehon Date C~ i 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _I_/_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are requiredi for fencing and/ot walls _I_/_ L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted far plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (DRC2003-00449) The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Pnor to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant /_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Department pnor to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/ recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter) 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department _I_/_ for approval M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_I_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_I_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 5 Provide draft stops in attics in Ime with common walls _/_/_ 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/ /_ 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/ /_ construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_1_ fire-resistive construction / / ~~~ Proied N o DRC2003-00449 Comolehon Date di ng N. Gra 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bwldmg Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_I_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Bwldmg and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. O. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 The protect shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Bwldmg Code _/_/_ Chapter 11A (Housing Accessibility) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 50 total feet on Arrow Route -/-/- 33 total feet on Baker Avenue -/-/- 2 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint _/_/_ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 3 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be _/_/_ dedicated to the City Q. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage faalities, community trails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees r~ L_ J ' ~i.~ ~~S Protect No DRC2003-00449 Completion Date 2 Pursuant to City Counal Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any bwlding service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permlt is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements regwred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Counal, except that in developments containing more than one bwlding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trad Other Arrow Route X X X X X X Baker Avenue X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item. 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permlt shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer ~ Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required Awash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer -~-~- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -~ /_ 1 J~~7~ Protect No ORC2003-00449 g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1 " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree speaes based upon field condi4ons and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer R. S. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Mm Grow Space Spacing Size tity Arrow Route Liquidambar NCN 8 ft 25 ft oc 15-gal Fdl-in - styraciflua "Palo Alto" Formal on alternating wide side of meandering sidewalk Baker Avenue Pistacia chinensi Chinese Pistache 5 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Fdl-in Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient defiaencies may regwre backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for ail protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage faalities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adfacent areas Completion Date _~~ / / / / / / / / / / / / _/_/~ F, ~/~~7 Protect No DRC2003-00449 Comole4on Date . T. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (ail underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as requved 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_I_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them U. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to budding permit issuance tf no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related admintstrahve fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable tf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first budding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: V. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be invandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ W. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _~ /_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ Protect No DRC2003-00449 Comolehon Date X. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track to any manner Y. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wstbdity. 2 At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be to compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department 3 All developments shall submit an 8'/:" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I I / / / I s „ r, ~~~y • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS September 29, 2004 Pinewave N/S Arrow, W/O Baker DRC2003-00449 and SUBTT16908 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercal/industrial projects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential projects is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants insingle-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections. m On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided. ,.~ l SD Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow • The regwred minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire spnnkler system in accordance with 13R with central station monitonng This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances. The regwred minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provde the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water supply plans are approved. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Multifamily structures greater than 7,500 square feet Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code Pnor to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire construction Services approval ana a owioin permit must be obtained Plans and speafications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Service in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 ~~.~ /`~l FSC-6 Fire District Site Access 1 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 2 Location of Access• All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 3. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside tum radws shall be 24-feet The minimum outside tum radws shall be 50-feet. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent w h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a mirnmum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 4 Access Doorways• Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 5 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required bwlding exterior openings 6 Residential gates installed across Fire Distract access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device. The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adtacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex 3 F,~1sa The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset 7. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan. illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to 68S for approval. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Compressed Gases Cryogenics Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Hazardous Materials Liquefied Petroleum Gases Public Assembly LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Welding and Cutting Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures FSC-17 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Urnfied Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department rewews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased oropertv which is required to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the installation of~ egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bulding, Fire, Mecharncal, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards F~l !~~ FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for revew and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or Crosses a property line, or Provide service to adiacent properties, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The s ~~~ /S~ agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of Sa~ Bernardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Diwsion and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delwering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect. All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness th hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the publi water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The budding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamong~ Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 6 ~J ~ ~SS 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the requred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subtect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraal/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commeraal and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 11 Fuel Modification: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area regwrements 12 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services y ~ ~ ~~~ 13 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provide contact information for Fire Distract use m the event of an emergency at the subiect building property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 14 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Y:' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector 8 ~j ?-!JC/ • T H E C I T Y O F RANCaO CUCAMONCA StaffReport DATE: March 23, 2005 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7.27 acre parcel into 11 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN: 0209-211-19 Related Flles• Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO. A request to develop 11 Industnal office/warehouse buildings totaling 126,843 square feet on 7.27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN: 0209-211-19 Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning: North -Industrial Building /vacant land; General tndustrial (GI) Distract, Subarea 5 South - Industrial Buildings; General Industnal (GI) Distract, Subarea 5 East - RecyGing Facility, General Industnal (GI) District, Subarea 5 West -Industrial Buildings General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 4 B General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Generallndustnal South - Generallndustrial East - Generallndustnal West - Generallndustrial Items "G" & "J" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 2 C Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant parcel that is generally square in shape with its southwest quadrant removed and resembles an upside-down "L." It is about 665 feet wide (east-west) by 615 feet deep (north-south). The protect site is bound on all sides by industrial development. To the north some of the properties are vacant. The properties to the north, south, and east are zoned General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5; the properties to the west are zoned General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 4. The subject property is generally level wdh no significant slopes Vegetation on the site is limited to low grass, and at the south side of the site there is a grouping of eight trees and miscellaneous shrubs. A north-south rail line spur is aligned along the east perimeter of the protect site. Industrial related traffic is primarily served by 6th SVeet, which is Gassified a secondary road (Exhibit E). D. Parkino Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Building 1 14,141 Office 3,316 1 /250 13 Warehouse t l T 10,825 1/1000 11 24 24 a o Building 2 6,933 Office 4,270 1 /250 17 Warehouse 2,663 1/1000 3 Total '20 19 Building 3 10,159 Office 2,250 1/250 9 Warehouse 7,909 1/1000 8 Total 17 19 Building 4 7,423 Office 4,270 1 /250 17 Warehouse 3,153 1/1000 3 Total 20 21 Building 5 7,392 Office 1,752 1/250 7 Warehouse 5,640 1/1000 6 Total 13 14 ~, T ~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 3 Building 6 6,427 Office 1,865 1/250 7 Warehouse 4,562 1/1000 5 Total 12 14 Building 7 10,669 Office 2,796 1/250 11 Warehouse 7,873 1/1000 8 Total '19 15 Building 8 6,761 Office 1,569 1/250 6 Warehouse 5,192 1/1000 5 Total 11 12 Building 8 10,971 Office 2,060 1/250 8 Warehouse 8,911 1/1000 9 Total 17 24 Building 10 21,317 . Office 5,020 1/250 20 Warehouse 16,297 1/1000 16 Total 36 36 Building 11 24,650 Office 4,840 1/250 19 Warehouse 19,810 1/1000 20 Total 39 39 Total (ALL) 228 237 'Shared parking, access, and maintenance have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. ANALYSIS: A General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 11 parcels ranging in size between 16,255 square feet (Parcel 6) and 51,996 square feet (Parcel 1), and construct a bwlding on each parcel. Note that Buildings 2 and 4, 3 and 5; 6 and 8; and 7 and 9 will be separated only by their respective walls (no apparent space between them); therefore, the site will appear to have only seven buildings (Exhibit D) All of the buildings will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels. Key architectural elements and features inGude a fomFlined concrete band on all elevations, extensive spandreUvis~on glass at the office r1 LJ Cam, ~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 4 comers and along the wall planes adjacent to pnmary budding entrances, cornices, and articulated towers and parapets. Although architecturally similar, each budding will incorporate different design attnbutes that favor speafic types of tenants The design and layout of Buildings 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9 are relatively small, with the exception of the roll-up doors, and will most likely be occupied by office tenants The other remaining buildings are larger and have Yuck-loading docks incorporated into their design. Additionally, as required by Section 17.30 of the Development Code, regarding rail service, because Bwldings 1, 3, and 5 are situated along the exsting rail line, their design incorporates knock-out panels for potential future rail service, via a rail spur constructed by others. The site has two access points (one pnmary and one emergency) from 6th Street. Truck parking and loading areas are located out-of-view from the public nght-0f-way. These areas will be screened by walls and gates or by the building themselves. Employee/visitor parking will be located throughout the site. A. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on November 2, 2004. At that time, several architectural and landscape design issues were raised that the Committee indicated must be corrected (Exhibit I) The applicant revised the proposal, as requested, and resubmitted the plans for afollow-up review on February 1, 2005. The Committee recommended approval of these revisions (Exhibit J). • B Gradmo and Technical Review Committees The Grading Review Committee reviewed the pro/ect on November 2, 2004. Because of a technical defiGency, the pro/ed was not approved. However, the applicant was able to resolve the problem, and at the Grading Review Committee on February 1, 2005, the project was subsequently approved. The Grading Review Committee recommended that the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action Technical comments were provided to the applicant and have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. C. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study was completed, and staff detennined that, with Mitigation Measures there would not be a sign cant adverse impact on the environment as a result of this protect. In the short-tens, there v~nll be construction related air qualdy and noise impacts. Long-term impacts mGude the removal or relocation of the existing trees (related file. Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804) and minor changes in drainage and hydrology. The loss of the trees that cannot be relocated will be mitigated by the proposed landscaping throughout the site, which inGudes eight trees of various speGes. Additional mitigation measures will minimize the impact of the changes in the on-site drainage and hydrology. Staff recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negative DeGaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site. ~g-t S / PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 - MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad er City Planner BB.MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit °A° - Location Map Exhibit °B° - Aenal Photo Exhibit °C° - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "D" - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit "E° - Site Plan Exhibit "F° - Grading and Cross-Sections Exhibit °G° - Building Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit °H° - Landscape Plan Exhibit °I° - Design Revew Committee Action Mmutes, November 2, 2004 Exhibit "J" - Design Review Committee Action Mmutes, February 1, 2005 Exhibit "K" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-01185 ~-, ~ s mY1R IdYNR GAXNHMM 5 ALTA [ ~ LWM i 81 y C 1'-mot j ,~., r= . i~ ~. &WQiDRJCA!!( -- CSNI'BALPABK"-. K,-...... ~• ,= i ~%~ ~ 0 ' PROJECT SITE _ ' _ ~',- uKEs ~ ~u ~~0 EXHIBIT `A' ~ ~ rt ' ,. ' an, sr ; ' EXHIBIT `B' G~~ ~ rn I V 6TH TRADE nonn~ _._~ ~~', i I tr j ~~'~I ,.-, D D _..~ ~_ _~ 'BEET INDUSTRIAL PR TIONAL ~ I ~ I ~~ I ;~ ~ , ~~~~ !~ ---_ ~ ~ 1~ I ~ it -- -- T~j___ ------- ~, ii ~~ II ~~ II ECT a~~ ,•..~ ~. . R,.. ~~~ ~~ ~~~ . ~R,~~~ ~o..e.~~ I~Rt)1g111011.- • ~.'IIInl~nlnoe Ytaie • ~~R iY ~~Y~11011Ip •nRC~~c•vm otvve M1..me,.o.~~ n.,ms,.o.~~,~ u..me..R,,,~,~ •~a„~w ..~p.~~~ Imrm u.oi.onmm u rr smm m•w® s:n.~°a.•:: mn 1 acs r • ea-o• ~.~, ~.~°® 2005 - erre unn~non ennr em sorer.aiem,¢ mo.am I I r"t; ~ e~ ~dl:,e~ d~ 9r., ~ ~tl ~ ~l:,1;;l; ~4 ~~! , ~ ~e ~ tl•6d I g add, el I~1• d!I ~~~ ~;~e des, 3 ~;,I f II X1(1 ~ (~i~ ~Qdi (9der ~~joi ~odi ~ ~I:p I 1.1 •1 rts•Gl rt..erit Illi I 8 B 9 ® O O B d ra rr rr xr _s aa e ra a- " •a a p .• ap xs . r .. __ sr , -9 xx A ga _ -= 9r : - r - 3' ~ "~ E I I m ~, I I i I I I I I ~ ~ aura r avx ~ vovu e rv s ~rrov ox arw revxr~, •L 1 I 1 I ~ I ~ waurr I aura r aou c ~aaxra yy'vv ryyx I I I I r I I 1 .,e., I r I ~~ 1 ~~~~ i I \ I ~.~.~~ I 1 < u I Z u w u vo _____ I ¢ - ~ ° ___ _____ ___ ____________ ______________ ______________________ _ _____ y 1 I r~~. ~ ~ I _ I ILL^~ I I I I --1 ~ , I ~~~^ ^V I I IoV ~ I I _ I ; 1 I a $$ ' ~~ I I~~ ~ d< i I I I ~< ' I Z~~¢ i~ ~ Ian o ¢n g I I I I iC I ° .v 6 t<~ I Ii0 O yo ~ I~ I I p~ I ~ < I ~ I I 1 I I ~~¢ tla < III t tl I ~V~ ~\ ~. I !m_`7o ° z I ~r - v ~1ar - ~~~'~- 1 I ~ RI §b n;tlp tAL_- I ~V -C O V~ I ~V I x,10155 a ~dd r{< I I ¢~ ~N y <pl 51 W ~ ~ C~1w ; I //~~~IL.,,7~~ ~ Idd cZ I~I io v.~ III ¢w ~o i i I V°~€< 9 9 0° I ~ ~ _ I I ~~ _ ~ ~il °g ~ n I °,L f L~ ; I _~___ I ~ x L ------- ---- - --- g # ----- ---- -- - ~ /- I ~z a ------- --r-` --- - - ~ m o ~ i a ° G I _ ___ ____________ ______a 1 I Q~3 ~ nHaQ ~ I I I 9 r o I °~ d d I I I I I ~ib' ~ ~ III ~ y 1 303 ° 9~ I ~a ~ ~tlC ` I I $ ~ I ~ ~. ° 11. r III d- ~ ~ ~ 1 I F° F edfi ; F III ~i .r N U I V 1 I u<~ s er I I s~ `,6 1 1 I I ~~~ o'' I i ~`• X02 ~ 1 I I I 1~ Z ~ N ~ I~ ~ Z ---~ - jlj I I e F L__ II 1 I ~ : f-- l 1 I ~ }lire I I I •t 1" o +' ~ ~ ~~ ~ o 4 ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~Q~i s -~11 ~~@~~~ 3~~~~ ~~F~! ~~~~~ ~~~~~ 3~i~@ EXHIBIT `D' ------------ G,S q ----------- a v m r ~_~ z m Z a 0 z a r ~~ L D C D 0 0 a ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~I D 2 m m z ~C~A V/ "~ _~ D r O m n O1 S'-J :_ 3~ 1181HX3 ~ ~ O 00 O ^ a5=' ~AF'4s §i<:;@a ~5 °Fd ZS°c;g9?'"s3 4p''}~5~§gRl ieggg ~:5;.x%iii§~ :c@~~5~=g`°-~ 5gy5r:~a?cs~ °p5af"-.<''~^-'°'~~ ~ ~ @ E ~ :~i$l5,d ;a35:'F@i%b•~4: AaG~~i@4yH ~5~~>rSi@6y~ 4~G ~i~~~iR9Qa bi~~~~~xA9a'g v~~1'~~iA99~ ~b~ F3~~II~~49 a4~ @B g:~ 555 ~, wPZ 55ipf r a-'°F5 p a 5 ~voa wf4 5ej5 w~=° 5va5 w Y 5-,35 - 9 o i i w~S~a's ~' ,; $~g °w~ qc~-~~ ~3~ g ~j36.;~ ~g~-.p~ i~$-~ ~ e G 3 j 4 4 i -:4:44CYC35 ._.Gx!44:Ye:5 YC-~°-£44e2E'i = .i4s6i4 ~t43 ___:4~gyekre .____i,i -~ A ~ -5 6f 'l-ii F Ctl' -' EI i - i.~'i pYE EEE_S_6 ~ B i` F k -G 6tl66E ~' ~ bEEtlx E tltlbtltl..-_ pE6Eb°rE 64tl~6 E _____ E° D -a ft$°': a: Etl Ftlk xr I / j t ~ } r C7 i 3 5 Ge ~` } ~ e aaw• av~ :: i~iES• §!~~aa4: i°-$ eC54iar w!_c_v sC G6aii"'•t`s~ Z ~ ! f ~ ` S' ssS~ i~: 9 ~• ~__ ~~ ~__ €8 ° %=_ €, F aF i •~- ai @_ @_F m ~ ~ y 4 5• ~;~'r-t Ar$~@Cg99 yb~ ~~~~IL~BB 6S~ pE~$@C:6$ d A4 (i~S99 ~8 ~7a`~iFga4 pSL A xef 2 iR 8 .i ° i~ 9 .5 A~ .i4fe. 4i ~q 9' .5. a~i.° G {G- s. 1 V ~ ~ 1 Y4 5 a9~~ 55ppg r eFe i 55apa gr wGi 55npa Y ~ i 5Fdp5 - ~ ~ b~Ap~ _ e '~ ~ Q ~ 2 C °~5 ~ B § ° 4 ~ ~ e _ - 2 C . i F y( FYrMr Y.§i YC F .1 - .Y [i44Y eC"-i .~ .Y:•ia~aj Y6~5 DS]~a31C.t.~~$.~ O ~ ! ~. `~ ~YSY6s6s_5iCSB iyi°~~66tliixe :.t EtlES6isF0 6ES5% 5+v ~6~~6 ~V pF F j S ~ i° p ?E~ 4~ payp Rqf: ~ 3 a 3 ~~ 96a@ eM fA ~. ~~ ~5~~ ~ a • $ G ~~ Sr~ } ~~~~~.,e VIII i6 b ~ ~ l l l tm ~ ~~ i !~ 1 ~~ ~ a~'I~ i ~;I •• ~ I i 11' ~ I ~ I ` j ~I i6 I ai~''~' Al ~ ~~ ~ ~ I I ' II ~~ ~- ~~ ~ _~ i 3 I ~I, i~ i8 31 l ~~ i ~ I I~ I Z -~ i4 s4 _ ei a -~ .~ i C ~~ ®L~'~ ~~,1181HX3 , i• a ~~ a i i~ Q O a ~ z. .. , 'D e~ ~ a~ _~ ~~ a ~~ I ~; i • i' ~a ~yr I 1 1 I I I i I i 1 I I I I i i 0 ~~~'~L '~ J .+ ' ~ ~~ ~6 (' `'p~~ it I ~' 1~~! !~l 1 ~~ ,J ' S Il .~ it ------------------------- ~a ,, ~i ~~ I I o I I ~ ! m 00 -.~ V ~\~ 1 • PARCEL NO. > FL OOR PLAN 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL C~ C[1 NORTH 3 SCALE 1• - B'-0• :~„,,,, """ JANUARY 3, 2005 33t¢¢~ fa ~~ U 0 ti W h 2 Q 0 Q W ti g 2 0 J m 0 ti J W 0 2 w Z 2 J 0 0 ti W W J y w 2 a 0 I~ ~; ! F :e ~` Ep ! g ~ .2 13 ~I ii ~. fp . 3 ! S ~e ,! 1: i ~! tt . ~ ~ , , B i6 l1 leS::•'~~i$e; 000000~~~00 .~l ~ h m ~~' ~j~ o W h aE ~~ ~s ';x ~~~. 0 W J Q U W U W O OC Q Z W W o~!~ r~ VJ `~`^ ~i./ 0 0 a z 7 J Q Z O H- Q Z W H Z r i r W O Q F- i • i ,~/A' ~l t i _ ~ 4A PROPOS ~~~__~~ -~ C WAREHOUSE rv PACE ~ ~ PA PROPo3 CEL N0. 4 OWAREHOUSE .v PALE 4B 2A 9 PR OSEO WAREHOI~4E •° Y SPACE ' t PA CEL NO. 2 , PROPOSED SP AREI10U5~ LE ev k p 26 ~' -- , o PARCEL NO. 2 + 4 FLOOR PLANS 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT Apr-NORTH V SCALE 1• - S'-O• TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 3, 2005 ~( l~ _1 ~r-. U GJ : .~ ,..,,,„. p .,.- .,..s,., p ..........,.. ©e:. ..~~~v.. O ~• O~ .., ~....... U : - ~... p ..... ~........~, BU/LO/NG SECT/ONA BU/LO/NGNO 4NORTHELE{/AT/ON 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT V ;~~ SCALE 1• - 8'-0• ;.~:°,'"`~"°" TRADE UN~ INTERNATIONAL ~ JANUAR~05 ---~---- ,==ua=.n BU/LO/NG NO 1SOUTNELE/AT/ON owcuirvv /vu ZEASTECE/AT/ON BU/LO/NG NO 4EASTELE/AT/ON o........raa /ra, +vvca/ccc yr//wv Gu2u/M+NU zYYGSY L:LB/AT/ON V~ o --- o ___ w ' PARCEL NO. 5 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE x SPACE a a PARCEL NO. 3 I O PROPOSED WAREHOUSE SPACE 0 0 0 0 ___ _ _ a ~ ., + PARCEL NO. 3 + 5 FL OOR PLANS 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NORTH 7 ~~ SCALE P - 8'-0' ..:;„z„""" """ TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 3, 2005 g 0 0 i i i 0 ti V W g h s m O i?; W O h n i i 0 m ~~ ~ O 4' iS fE ~ ~ i i' 60 1 i.~ ; E i :;` :Sii~ ~ e t x ~ i~ iy t .~ :i. 5': ~ ~s}d~: i:~ 00000000000 u e W h Z z s 0 W y pn 2 2 0 m 3; ;a ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ w U y U W O J Q /~ Z ~"' w w F-- ~/~ 0 Z a I¢ J Q z O a z w z _~ ~~ W O Q H ~I I --- --- PARCEL NO. 8 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE SPACE 1 6A ' o PROPOSED WMENOUSE SPACE w 0 PARCEL NO. 6 ~ ~ . PROPOSED WAREHOUSE SPACE e _ ~ Y ~ ~ p 6B ___ ~ I PARCEL NO. 6+8 FLOOR PLANS 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT `1~ NORTH .~~ art ei c ... m_n. ,...,..... ,.... TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 3, 2005 0 i; O u e W 0 a s m 0 W b i s m W W O 2 m g 2 0 m 0 W 0 y b Z 2 0 ~~ / { _. a• r E 'I ~ z = t c 6 ~i =s f E f i u? ii y~ f .a tI~ s a i a ~a E ~s Si pE i3 3: i e i E 4e f ii !: i 00000000000 O >; u {ti 3 b g a s m a V wti 3 m g s' 0 B: i' ~9~ .,i 0 O S® w J 6 U 0 U W O J a '~ Z W W `//~^' v / `2 1 Q a z a ~~ J Q Z O H Z W Z Z W 0 Q • ~ f~ `' 1 PARCEL NO. 7 + 9 FL OOR PLANS 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT C~ NORTH 11 ~~ SCALE 1' B'-O' :.,,..,,, """' TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL ~ . _ ~ PARCEL No.9 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE SPACE PARCEL No 7 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE SPACE • • t __ __ .~.....n r. ' ~ - - ° ~o JANUARY 3, 2005 ~-I n~Y' I r~~ L-. .rc r--~ "° ~.""~ ° _ _ ~ - _ _ ru a 01 ---- ~ --- ~~.W ;~ ..b..~~,~.,. .~•,,, BU/LD/NG NO 9SOU7NELEVAT70N ~~~ .~ BU/LD/NG NO 7SOUTN ELEVAT/ON p •_.....,-,. © ..._ _...~a.,n ,p ... • ...,. _. U eL _....~..,, p ,.. O _,........,, O :...:.~..°,...~ p ....,,...~ BU/LO/NG NO 7EASTELEVAT/ON BU/LO/NG NO 1WESTELEVAT/ON i J •M..,~,•M; 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT SCALE 1• • B'-o• : ~~-• TRADE U~N INTERNATIONAL ~ JANUAR~ Zoos BU/LO/NG NO 9 FA.STFi ove nnv BU/LD/NG NO 9WESTECEVAT/ON • • ~ w PARCEL NO. >O FLOOR PLAN 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NORTH 13 ;~ SCALE T A'-n• :...,._.. ~•"" TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 3 Zoos ~ 9 /va /~a~~m ~crvAnVrv 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT ~"r. .e .. en.. ~' ~ ~..._ suw Qi n...~ nr.ou in ~ ...... . s.. ~. Q e.e M•~n .r ©:..« ~..u wr. Q • e.•- ~.. .i ur. ~r •... •w. ....n Q .~...ri .• .... uc SCALE 1' S'-0' r., ~:,".; °'"" TRADE U~N INTERNATIONAL JANUA~ 2005 'n BU/LO/NG NO fO WESTELE/AT/ON -1`` BU/LO/NG NO fOEASTELEI/AT/ON ~ i ! N "I nin » Fi nna of ani 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT NORTH ~~ SCALE 1• S'-0• ':H,""" ~""" TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 3, 2005 o . _ . _.,..., o .......,.. o. .m o ~, o :_._,.,c_., o _.,,n_..,., _t 1J~ Vl BU/LO/NG NO 1f {4~ESTELEVAT/ON BU/LD/NG NO 1f NOR7NECEVAT/ON 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL PROJECT ~~ ~°~ •~"- 3CALE 1' ~ 8'-0• TRADE U N~ INTERNATIONAL ~ JANUAR~Os BU/CO/NG NO 7f EASTELEVAT/ON m an 2 V l ~~ J __P'ehmimrv Plantin¢Le¢eeA Tora(a ~~ ^m° ~~ „v. wnmmr -- ~~ .~•-...`.r" " .- _ ...mod..... -...r :'~~ :.."' ~ r .- a... O ~...~ . . . ..r. ....... ,~.... ,.- ® ~ - r rr~r, ~~ ,.or ~ ~. „y O-~Y~wrrr ~„+ ~-~tis . liar d ®ra~~ ® a„r~~ ©...r ah'ub, Vme @ Om,md Covc P,kfm N R ,N~ _ -_~ ~.rr r.rr. " -w.. .~~, w.r sr~. i..'~.....r .„w.- ....„n~~ .+.n+.~- ~. ,:.~ ~,.rr, ..:.,- w~ ~, ~,~,.~ A ..._ r.~.r ~.w.,rr r..,.. a+bm. ir.. tam ro us a®o..a ~_-- ::_ ~~~ PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL "~° "°~ E"~""'•D TRADE UNION INTERNATIONAL Mark capc~hao ~~_ Rancho Cucamonga,Califomia Cap BrothersCoastruchonCo o...,.,.a.„ xoxo oa.~oabd. swr~los w„x.eve,.aa.:,~ L-1 rmmw.G~l .~,.~,m..,~ r~ ~,o„~I~. ~,n.m,,,, ,~..,, ~, DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Mike Smith November 2, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7 27-acre parcel into 12 parcels in the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN 0209-211-19. Related File DRC2003-01185. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO -A request to develop 11 Industnal office/warehouse buildings totaling 127,247 square feet on 7 27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN 0209-211-19 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 Design Parameters The irregularly shaped parcel resembles an upside-down "L" The site Is undeveloped with limited vegetation The property to the north is vacant, all other surrounding properties, including the "Not-A-Part" quadrant, are developed with Industnal buildings Parallel to the east property line is a rail line. Each building incorporates different design attnbutes that favor specific types of tenants. The design and layout of Buildings 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9 are relatively small and, with the exception of roll-up doors, will most likely be occupied by office tenants The other remaining buildings are larger and have truck-loading docks incorporated into their design Additionally, as required by Section 17.30 of the Development Code regarding rail service, because Buildings 1, 3, and 5 are situated along the existing rail line, their design incorporates knock-out' panels for potential future rail service, via a rail spur constructed by others The site has two access points (one pnmary and one emergency) from 6th Street Truck parking and loading areas are located out-of-view from the public nght-of- way These areas will be screened by walls and gates, or by the building themselves Employee/visitor parking will be located throughout the site The buildings are designed with two pnmary building matenals/finishes The construction each building will be compnsed of concrete tilt-up panels Each wall plane will have both painted and form-lined concrete texture bands Honzontal and vertical articulation of the wall planes is limited to the office areas of each building; there is no articulation on any of the other wall planes The lack of articulation is most apparent along the west elevations of Buildings 2, 4, 6, and 8; the north elevation of Building 10 and the south elevation of Building 11, the adjoining wall planes of Building 7 and 9, and the northeast comer of Building 1 The design of each building includes a mix of vision and spandrel glass at the office comers and along the wall planes adjoining the pnmary building (office) entrances. The other wall planes along the west elevations of Buildings 2, 4, 6, and 8, the east elevations of Building 1, 3, 5, and 7, the north elevation of Building 10 and the south elevation of Building 11, and the adjoining wall planes of Building 7 and 9 are missing this commonly required architectural element Note that this deficiency generally coincides with the missing articulation resulting in relatively bare wall planes. ~_~ Landscape coverage as proposed by the applicant meets the minimum requirements of the Industnal Distncts However, in some areas, the depth of the planter areas provided is less than 5 feet (not including the 6-inch concrete curb) Along the west sides of Buildings 2, 4, 6, 8,10, and 11, along the north sides of Buildings 1 and 5, the south side of Building 3, and the east side of Building 11 the depth of the planter provided is 3 feet, including the 6-inch curb. EXHIBIT `I' Usa~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO November 2, 2004 Page 2 Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project Provide additional horizontal and vertical articulation on the wall planes of each bwldmg as noted above 2 Provide additional vision/spandrel glass on the elevations of each bwldmg as noted above Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Incorporate bermed landscaping along the 6th Street frontage within the landscape setback and landscape areas 2 Incorporate ground cover and imgation within the 25-footwide by615-foot long area dedicated for the future rail spur (constructed by others) at the east side of Buildings 1, 3, 5, and 7 Outdoor storage or similar use is not permitted within this area 3 Increase the depth of all landscape planters to 5 feet, not including the 6-inch curb Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. Decorative paving shall be provided at the primary vehicular access point on to the site Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal with the above modifications prior to scheduling for Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action. Members Present Coleman, Fletcher, Stewart Staff Planner Mike Smith The Design Review Committee reviewed the architectural plans forthe proposed industrial buildings and stated that the project regwres revisions The applicant was directed to incorporate their comments into the revision and resubmit the plans for Committee review The application can then be forwarded to the Planning Commission for its review and action. Issue #1 Architecture -All bwldmg elevations, except those with a zero setback at the property lines, should have spandrel glass and physical articulation of the wall planes in order to achieve 360-degree architecture as noted below The southwest comer of Building #7 and southeast comer of Budding #9 (adloimng wall planes at their south elevations) must incorporate horizontal and vertical articulation of the wall plane, raised cornices/parapets, and spandrel/vision glass These parts of the budding are at the end of the entry drive aisle and must provide a focal point G,S~a DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO November 2, 2004 Page 3 The east elevations of Buildings 1, 3, 5, and 7 must have spandrel glass panels It is not necessary to articulate these elevations because of the practical limitations of the rad spur alignment on the east side of the protect site The west elevations of Bwldmgs 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, the north elevation of Bwlding 10, and the south elevation of Building 11 must have spandrel glass and physical articulation The physical dimension of each panel must be proportional to the size of the wall panel to which it is applied (i a excessively small panels are not acceptable) Also, the quantity of glass panels should be proportional to the length of the wall plane Physical articulation of the wall planes, where requred, should include "pop-outs of wall panels about 3 feet from the pnmary wall surface and raised parapets As an alternative, the applicant can "inset" certain wall panels to achieve the desired depth Issue #2 Landscaping -The Committee requested changes to the landscaping as noted below The area in the parking lot directly in front Buildings 7 and 9, at the end of the dnve aisle, should incorporate a landscape island with an art piece The Committee indicated that the applicant could forego some of the parking at this location and still fulfill the parking regwrement for the overall site The 3-foot wide (including 6-inch curb) landscaped area at the west sides of Bwldmgs 2, 4, 6, and 8 can be eliminated and, in exchange, the landscape area along the west property line can be widened to compensate Tfie landscaping around each trash enclosure can be minimized to vine pockets only. The rad spur easement along the east penmeter of the site shall incorporate landscaping throughout its entire length Note that the minimum landscaping (7 percent) is sttll required The landscaping incorporated into the rad easement area cannot be counted towards this minimum Issue #3 Matenal/finish -Form-lined concrete as proposed bythe applicant is an acceptable finish Sandblasting will not be required Secondary issues -The Committee expressed some concerns about the outdooremployee eating areas and access by all property owners/tenants on the site The applicant indicated that reaprocal access would be provided (r 3' 3d DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Mike Smith February 1, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7 27-acre parcel into 11 parcels in the General Industnal District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN• 0209-211-19 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO -A request to develop 11 industnal office/warehouse buildings totaling 127,247 square feet on 7 27 acres of land in the General Industrial Distnct (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street- APN 0209-211-19 Related File• Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 Background This application was previously reviewed bythe Committee on November 2, 2004 At that time, several architectural and landscape design issues were raised that the Committee indicated must be corrected (see attached November 2, 2004, Design Review Committee Action Comments) The applicant was directed to revise the application and resubmit the plans for a follow-up Committee review and recommendation to the Planning Commission The basic design parameters remain unchanged from the previous submittal The ma/only of the design revisions requested by the Committee have been completed, as noted below Staff believes that the prolect is now representatwe of the City's design charactenstics and standards. Issue #1 • Architecture -All budding elevations, except those with a zero setback at the property Imes, should have spandrel g/ass and physical art~culat~on of the wall planes m order to achieve 360-degree architecture as noted below: The southwest comerof Bwldmg #7and southeast comerof8wldmg #9 (ad~oimng wall planes at the~rsouth elevations) must incorporate honzontal and vertical art~culahon ofthe wall plane, rased com~ces/parapets, and spandn:Uvis~on glass These pants ofthe budding are at the end of the entry dnve aisle and must provide a focal point Solution The parapets at the descnbed location have been raised 2 feet higher than the parapets of ad/scent panels and cornices to match the "tower' elements have been applied The wall plane of these comers project outward from the pnmary wall plane 5 feet, providing additional physical articulation Spandrel glass, sandblasted firnsh, and vertical reveals are now included The east elevations of Bwld~ngs 1, 3, 5, and 7 must have spandrel glass panels It is not necessary to articulate these elevations because of the practical l~mitat~ons of the rail spur alignment on the east sde of the project site Solution The east elevation of the most visually prominent building along 6th Street, Bwldmg 1, has two 5-foot by 6-foot spandrel glass panels and, at the top half of the "tower" element on the southeast comer, one 10-foot by 6-foot spandrel glass panel The east elevations of the other buildings, which are not visually prominent from 6th Street, do not have spandrel glass • The west elevations of Bw/dings 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, the north elevation of Bwldmg 10, and the south elevation of Building 11 must have spandrel glass and physical articulation. ~~H1~17° `J' G, S ~~ DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 - MARK CAPELLINO February 1, 2005 Page 2 Solution The west elevations of Buildings 2, 4, 6, and 8 now incorporate wall planes that, at unequal intervals between 50 to 80 feet (horizontal measurement), protect inward/outward by 2 to 3 feet The north elevations of Bwldmgs 5 and 10 and the south elevations of Buildings 3 and 11 each incorporate a wall segment that is inset 2 feet from the primary wall plane. A 2-foot higher parapet is provided at the segments where the wall planes have been articulated Added definition has been provided at the southwest comers (Bwldmgs 2, 6, and 9), at the northwest comers (Bwldmgs 1, 4, and 8), and the southeast comer (Budding 1) by incorporating physical "pop-outs" and raised parapets that create "tower" elements All tower elements include spandrel glass on their upper sections and, depending on visibility and location, vine trellises or spandrel glass on their lower sections Issue #2: Landscaping -The Commdtee requested changes to the landscaping as noted below: The area in the parking lot directly in front of Bwldmgs 7 and 9, at the end of the dove aisle, should incorporate a landscape island with an art piece The Commdtee indicated that the applicant could forego some of the parking at this IocaUon and still fulfill the parking requirement for the overall site Solution The applicant has eliminated the parking stalls and replaced them with an outdoor employee eating area and landscaping See Mator Issues below for additional discussion. The 3-foot wide (including 6anch curb) landscaped area at the west sides of Bwldmgs 2, 4, 6, and 8 can be eliminated and, in exchange, the landscape area along the west property line can be widened to compensate. The landscaping around each trash enclosure can be minrmrzed to vine pockets only The rail spur easement along the east perimeter of the site shall incorporate landscaping throughout ds enLre length. Solution The applicant has revised the landscaping at the west side of the project site and around the trash enclosures, and has added ground coverwithin the rail spuralignmentalong the east side of the protect site. Issue #3 Matenal/fimsh -Form-lined concrete as proposed by the applicant rs an acceptable finish. Sandblasting will not be required. Solution The applicant has elected to apply bands of sandblasted finish to all elevations along the base and at mid-height of each budding and on the panels of the tower elements Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect The applicant has requested clarification on the artwork requested in front of Budding 7 and 9 They have modified the budding elevations and open area as noted above in a manner that they believe adequately creates a focal point at the north end of the drive aisle Only three palm trees are proposed for this 60-foot long space Staff recommends a stronger, more creative landscape design including, but not limited to, canopy shade trees or trellis structure. The Committee should also discuss whether public art should be provided. G, T 3~ DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO • February 1, 2005 Page 3 2. The applicant is providing ground cover with irrigation within the rad spur alignment. Although the Committee requested trees and shrubs, the applicant requests consideration of ground cover only as this condition is temporary until a rad spur is constructed by others Staff recognizes that any landscaping m the rail spur area is "throw-away;" however, recommends adding trees and shrubs along side of Bulding 1 only because of its prominence to 6th Street, a designated special boulevard. Policy Issues' The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. Decorative paving shall be provided at the pnmary vehicular access point on to the site, behind the nght-of-way line extending at least 20 feet deep into site Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval to the Planning Commission subject to the above recommendations. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present. Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner. Mike Smith The Committee recommended approval subtect to Providing creative landscaping and benches within the employee eating area in front of Buddmgs 7 and 9. Add trees and shrubs along the east side of Building 1 The applicant asked if they could pave or gravel access along the east property line (where future rad spur/siding is); however, the Committee did not recommend this The applicant asked if they could replace sand blasted concrete to form linerfor more colorflexibdity m the future when repainting the buildings. The Committee recommended approval of form liner. GS ~ i :,._~ Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Ormsron (9091417-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or pant clearly using Ink Use the tab key to move from one line to the next Ime The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports maybe required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETEAPPLICAT/ONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the app6cahon is complete at the Line o/ submittal, Gty staff wdl not be available to perform wor required to provide missing inlormabon AppOCahon Number for the protect to which this form pertains G/1(/ ~A?!'"Q~~~/GJ ,~~{jfPj ~,t}L{,S Pro ect 7rtle / 7H l r(i Srw'tEr ~i/otsrRiNG PQoJ[~GT Name 8 Address o/pro/ect owner(s) 6tI~/ pin/ G./~6 - '165/ Sr~~rE Sr I~'b„r ~,~~,t~ Name 8 Address oI developer or protect sponsor ~ Sr7MC AS .980/E u M \PLANNIN3;FINAL\FORMSOOUNTERJnNaI Study Part? docPage 7 G ~ ~~ Rev 6/30/03 Contact Person & Address M/ARK G7PEUi.~/O - ?l~r17 DFJ /7MO 8Ld(7 S/iTi•' /OS To.ZPiaNGI= LIB 4oSo/ Name 8 Address of person preparing this lorm (d different from above) - .Si3Mi_ r~S r, ap/t - Telephone Number 3/O• HBB- `/Q/~8 '1) Provide a /ull scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o(the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro)ect site, and mdlcafe the sde boundaries 2) Provde a set o/ color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, wews into and lrom the site /rom the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of sign/scant /eatures /rom the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 31 Pro/ectLocahon (describe) ~!B/O SxTh/ Sn~Er ~i9rv(C/~O G~c~9nonr6i~ . Er73r of r~A'cr-/rl3i~G0. t~/:.sT of Hc~iasi•7 NoRrr/ Sued or` S~xr.H 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet ~/necessary) OZ_o9. 2r/ -/9 ' GGtip + GL~1J9• Z// • Z7 • GL's 'S) Gross Site Area (ac/sq hJ 7 t?7 AG 3/6 8S9 Set. FT. '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area o(publ~c streets 8 proposed ded~cahons) 6, 9.S r7G. 3oZ (-,6 7 sp• fT. 7J Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would a/lect the pro/ect site (attach addrt~onal sheet ~/necessary) Nor/,t /-7PPlaGr7~/T BE[rE/ES PPoFL'~E,o Vi40JEGT IS ~n/S.tSTi9r/T r/iTH 6r.'n/G,l?~7(.- PW~/ t G'yR~2fn/T ZOiJ/rJ PIANNWG\FINALIFOR MSICOUNTER\Imtial Study Part1 docPage c /~ ~ ~J Rev 6/30/03 Inlormabon indicated by an asterisk (') is not required o/non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff 8) Include a descnphon ofall permits winch will be necessary from the Crty o/Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies rn order to /ully implement the protect Gdi7L7/N. - PdduG W.~rr~? • ScwE~' • Sreze+^f 0r2A/n/• Piz/d/~TE W+~T.t/2 •Stn/i~ Sro.~/'/ • UrfD.u~6~dr//J F/Rt SP.z+/,~lE~t o/%Z~ri~~ Fi.~2E Sr~2i~/YU~ $/ica//6 • /7LdMd~w6 • tL.GLr.~/~i~L• +~licN.9~/+G7L • ri~2t Sr'ti'i~/~Lt,~ Hoi/irp,~ 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the protect including information on topography, sod stabildy, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any ex~strng structures on site (mcludmg age and cond~t~on) and the use of the structures Attach photographs ofsignrficant features described In addrbon, ate all sources ofinformation (i e , geological and/orhydrologic studies, brobc and aroheological surveys, traffic studies) G/R~FiJT Sint r5 //~G9NT SITE /S n3_U7TiyGEY Fu~T W.rN Sut/fT fLoPE Tv nfc Svr/T/iev+~T_ SoieS AR'.CA/2 STi9.deE r7rJD ~0N6/.ST/fidT wir/`/ 07NE12 rJ.t'E~~S sdny/.V TNT GTY. /\~ ffn//f+U~~/T PG~NTS 0,2 /i//rrr/BLS A.~?E r7P/7+?F.NT SaMr .cL~J~JZE T.t2F_ c 5 Est rST cl•~/ TN.E H~STr SLY Gb~iig/ OF Tiff ~,zTv TN.F.?c A.dt No Ex.sr/~/G Srz/crvt2is on/ T~l~ ~r"1=,ZTY • Tifi-ti'r .~~ No .KNOw./ r2~i~s..~.}os, oea//~a~ ~avese;t o,Q Scr~•i+c i~sPtcTS 1O) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Crte all sources ofrnformabon (books, published reports and oral history) i7Pfn-rG~NT /5 /tl7T Hw/9a'E or ANY LdLr7iiZi,'L v,2 s/+srodl~L /7Sf'cGT3 of T/~iS Sit • . I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Iniual Study Pant docPage 3 / ' T ~~ Rev 6/30/03 11) Describe any noise sources ana~neirlevels that now affect the site (airorefl, roadwaynase, etc) and howthey will aHed • proposed uses T~~.Pc .s No ,wo./ni dw~s of n6,Ls~ - rxcr-PT Entsrrvr'_ RO/~.ow%~ Y ~~ ~" sT.zr;.r_rl ~o rrloi~cr r~ atcrro 12) Describe the proposed pro/act m detail This should provide an adequate description ofthe sdeln terms of uPomate use that will result from the proposed pro/act Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anGc~pated completion o/each increment Attach add,Gonal sheet(s) d necessary f7pPYicAi/T is P~sin/6 // TIC/sn~ii~L ~M.7.dvFi~l~inc/ D.ST.~.BdT•Ml~ B/iLOiN6S, GNS772~no..1 ~ ~/~ /N ONt PN~)SE W rid Corlr2.r_non/ !t/irilii/ oNC YFJ9,~' or Cor>µfc.~K.~IENT of Lo.~CSrde.%rs/ 13) Describe the surrounding properties, ,ncludmg mlormaGon on plants and animals and any cultural, h~stoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (resdential, commeroal, etc ), mtensrty o(land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (he/ght, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) 73fr S/.~ZI~'or/.,/A,//6 P.~I~G.zY.~S '/7/Z,E IiGN,cR/~IL Ii/Dr/STia}7L 7»t w't it No r71'~iii2r'NT f//-r/,~i~L /~.s ro,~ic~/ o.Z Scr".yi c /~s.~ccrS. Pc.~/n./G Ar~~R5 ro B~ o,,d~'~ Br rrI Girt i 14) Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general eras of the pro~ect7 //v - l~dzlr_cT /5 fcvirsl~3i~/T ~/irN lv~2ti'ra/r 1~E/c1o/~Mti/TS IIPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTtR1lniGal Study Partl doePage4 ~~ 2 n Rev 6/30/03 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these Hasa levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods o/soundproofing are proposed? ~.QOJEGT iS SPGC. //o /Sr~-+Z5 ~~~/r B,e'en/ iDi?Nri`iEp dP~a3nir LbtS n/or i,'.vrin.%~r~ •7nfY t'x'bdGENS in/ 77~iS A'~i~. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees SoMr_' 77ZEt-'.5 WILL //L"EO To ./3r .~tiao%:d. i~PPG74~NT hfid5 ~or/7•Pi#cTr~ W rN fi3Md£L ,L~n/i~yP - /W/)PP + /~ssOU~)rI_< Ta ~/iD.t aA~i~y2rG/Lry.~L ~; Po.ZT' 17) Indicate any bodies of water pncludmg domestic water supplies) into wbch the site drams- /yi7//L= 18) Indicate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water D~stnct at 987-2591 a Res~denha/ (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) b Commero~aUlnd (gal/day/ac) ..~wx Peak use (ga4mm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ^ SepGc Tank ~ Sewer I/septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolat~on tests I/discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expecteddarlysewagegenerahon (SeeAttachmentA/or usageesGmates) For furtherclanficaGOn,pleasecontadthe Cucamonga County WaterOrstnct et 987-2591 a Resrdent~al (gaUday) b CommeraaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenhal units Detached (indicate range of paroel saes, mrnrmum lot size and maximum lot srze• Attached (md~cate whether unds am rental or for sale unds) I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERVnihal SWdy Partt docPage 5 Gr ~ ~ p Rev 6/30/03 21) Anbc~pated range o(sa/e pnceo and/or rents _ Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Speclty number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anhapated household sze by unit type 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be res/dmg wrthm the protect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts es shown m Attachment 8 a Elementary b Junior Hlgh c SemorHigh COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type o/use(s) and ma(or function(s) of commercial, industrial orlnstrtubonal uses /~jpvJCGT ~S S dSES r7 /N.ei.7arr/n/ 26) Total floor area o/commercial, mdustnal,, or msMut~onal uses by type Tbn~L /-/-~iZ i~.~F9 /28. S~ZZ Sa FT J.vywS>'.PiAL 27) Indicate hours of operation i///.l~(pI/n/ - /~a /7diEJ~eE< .QtR/e 12'p 28) Number of employees Total /~/~Nv//i/ Maximum Shrtt Time of Maximum Shrtt I (PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER1lniaal Study Part1 docPage 6 ~ -\^ ?tA Rev 6/30/03 . i 29) Provide breakdown ofanbc~pated fob class~flcahons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an mdicahon ofthe rate of hire /or each class~ficahon (attach adddional sheet /l necessary) dN,t~NaVn/ 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently resde In the Cdy '31) For commero/al and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount o/a/r pollution em/ss~ons (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air (?ual~ty Management D/stnct, at (818) 572-6283) yn/t'Nod,/ ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agenaes serving the protect been contacted to determ/ne there abdrty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect? 1(so, please indicate the/rresponse /JPYL/G~NT r1i7S i/AD !o~!/~,e~.~li~g yry f7/L ~}' SEw/icES . No AVi'i7,?r~r fr~'/.CE ~b~~ 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples ofhazardous and/ortoxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, peshadesand herb~c~des, /uels, ods, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage ofanyofthe above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known //o/% I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initlal Study Part1 docPage 7 ~ /' _ '~" 1.~.,~ Rev 6/30/03 - 34) Wrtl the proposed protect involve me remporaryorlong-term use, storage, or discharge ornazardous and/ortoxic matenals, including but not l~mrted to those examples listed above9 1I yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and • proposed method ofdisposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and ' labeled on the application plans I hereby certdy that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infonnat~on required Ior adequate evaluation o(this protect to the best o(my ability, that the /acts, statements, and informabon presented a2 true and correct tot he best ofmy knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information maybe required to tie submitted be/orn an adequate evaluation can be made by the/City olRancho Cucamonga ~/ Date f1i'~Z/L 6 2R~y Signature .%i~~~~/ Tdle or/r/t,QS •t~ER3~fs/7rdT/t/t I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inihal SWdy Part1 docPage 8 ~ ~ ( Rev 6/30/03 ~. ~~I~I .••1 ( ~ II a II P II ~f_.. ' a `~ _- ~ ~ ~ i. ltr t~` 3 ~. S / - } ~r . n r ~~ n ~~I190 n I I p - ' ~ I _ _ r . \_ - - ~ , _ R u r a ii ~InD~ ~ _ . . ~ I .... i i HUR4 _ _____ _ ... a..... __ ' ~ - s, ~ - 1 p r P P ~ ... I ° _ .. ' ` ,w ~ > IiJO P P ` ~~ ~ ~ w _ eh e a ~^ p 4 P '~- ~z ..._. _ ~ ,120-r ler . . A i ~ .. p D p /1/ p ...... ° I .... ~ ~ ' . '.P• • ... a l !LANE ~ I I .. ..... ..^.. ...... ~ B p 1108 o ~ P tl e y a-. ~ .... p p ,y ~ refer W- I tl I a ~` • ~ ~ ~ ar . X90 P i • • , I ~ ~ ur ~ ~~ tl 1 I ~~ _ 1110 _ ~ n no ~/ I i ~\_S ~1 1 n I .. n ^ I • p r Jso Seh , , ~. ;.. llJt - Iryay j • 1 ... •. •~ .•O + y ..~~ ... ... i EKf! '^ ::..: ...: .:...:. 'ar st h .. ~ e tl sr Roc ... ~_ .1 ; ~ ___ i_ ___ I __ _______ _ _ _________ n __- -_- ~_ EOER _ _ ____ . ®RGServ01 ~ n 1 p tl n P __ -.v ~ , 090 ' _ Well ; I tl ,.C ~ r ._ n n /~ li ._..... " t ~~+, - ^~ l4 I .oB6...=.a..==~ J ... 1 ~... .... ... ........ . Well u Well I ~ n \a0 I n n ~ p n ~ nee ! II ii n O50 n II ° /OS n II A i 050 W o Well• n n C~ n II p ' a / o RANCHO CA - ~ DIN ROUNDAR ``\ ,i ~ •I ~ U ORese~~ ~ ' \ n 1~ I • \ ^°p I • I ~ tl -. .r ~ II ~ a --- -' ~.. .. .. ~}Jater •- \`~SA • Tank • unc G t ~' ~ ~ - - - ' l ~ ~9~ I~ 1~ ~ ^n I l I 9J0 ~~ w.r. rt ll 4 I I 1 -- -- - -_- \ ~ - ' ` ~ ~ ~ CIFlC _ F ~ - -~ Sr _ 59 Well ~I y _ _L`~ ul ~ _ P ii ~ n ~-~ _ ` _ ~-_ n I ~ ~ _ 31 ~ I n i P o W > ~ u ~ w 0 .• , ~, <,- ~,~„' }~~;;° ~P~,;", t yrf ,, ,fs,, ~~- ,,' >. , ,. ~'~ ~ ,N ,~, ! ~Y1M~"/ ~+2irN,iJ t 'F ppe~r t l~x ~~ ~Y s O ~ ~~"'r O O ,~ r- v w O ~ ~ Q~ o ~ wh ~ CJ o = r~,, ~ V ~- ~ C1 ~ = w z n- I- ~ F- w w w c!~ S cQ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project Fde• Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00680 3. Description of Project. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7 27 acre parcel into 11 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN 0209-211-19 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to develop 11 industrial officelwarehouse bwldings totaling 126,843 square feet on 7 27 acres of land m the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN 0209-211-19 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mark Capellino Cap Brothers Construction 2020 Del Amo Boulevard, Swte 105 Torrance, CA 90501 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI) Distract, Subarea 5 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. The project site is bound on the east, west, and south by industrial development The property to the north is vacant All surrounding properties are zoned General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 The property is generally level with no significant slopes A north-south rail line spur is aligned along the east perimeter of the project site Sixth Street is classified as a Secondary road and serves primarily industrial-related traffic 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drroe Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10) Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None J "'r'-f ~J Initial Study for DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR- Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 (/) Aesthetics (/) Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ()Mineral Resources OPublic Services O Utddies/Sernce Systems ()Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) HydrologylWater Quality ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Recreation ()Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Quality (/) GeologylSoils ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed pro/ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect m this case because revisions in the pro/ect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the envronment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially signific is i) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIV RATION ur a t to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigat ursuant to that r IR or N ATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitig i measures that e o upon th proposed protect, nothing further is required Prepared B Date ~ ~ z/O Reviewe Date ~~ ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 3 Lass Than $IpNflpnl Lass Polmflally N9s, Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Slyrvflgnl MNDaaon 51{ptlflonl Na In as Ingo arate0 I as I as EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantlally damage scenlc resources, Including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and hlstonc buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantlally degrade the existing visual character () () () (/) or quality of the site and Its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantlal Ilght or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In the areal Comments' a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site The site is not wlthln a view corridor according to the General Plan Exhlblt III-15 b) The project site contains no scenlc resources and no hlstonc bulldings wlthln a State Scenlc Highway There are no State Scenic Highways wlthln the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and Is characterized by Industrlal developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north Is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for Industrlal use as well The vlsual quallty of the area will not degrade as a result of this project Design review Is required prior to approval Clty standards require the developer to underground exlsting and new utility Imes and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utlllty Imes and utlllty enclosures In accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by Bald Resolution d) The protect will create new Ilght and glare because the site Is currently vacant The design and placement of Ilght fixtures will regwre review for consistency with the Clty standards The Impact Is not considered significent ~) Lrght standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination is confined within the project site. Glare shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of indirect lighting. A Photometric Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or O O O (/ ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Callfomla Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict wdh existing zoning for agricultural use, or O O O (/) a Williamson Act contract ~ S ~(o Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Signifiwnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Palenaally SigNficanl wtn MNgatlan man Significant No i a loco cea i a i a c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by industrial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for industrial use as well There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The motor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan far which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by industrial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for industrial use as well The nearest agricultural land is about 1/4 mile to the west-southwest of the pro/ect site at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the O O O (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or pro/ected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase () () () (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create ob/ectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? CT/ ~ T' 1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 5 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigrcfiont Wilh Mlligatlon man SiBnifionl No I n Inm tetl I cl I d Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development well contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers with equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site far Clty verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rutes 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. "fib Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 ~~,» Signfirem L<•~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pole°~ny Significant w,m MNgatlm Than S~grvfiranl Na 1 I teE I cl I ct • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. • fi) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR (Final Environmental Impact Report), Nox (Nitrogen Oxides), ROG (Reactive Organic Gases), and PM,IO (Fine Particulate Matter) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-teen, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. ~T~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 7 less Tian SiQrvficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PWentlally Signifionl WIN ikL~hon Than Signifipnt No I d In tee I cl I ci 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts d they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is surrounded by industrial development, however, is located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors single-family residences approximately 13 mile to the west along Archibald Avenue Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obfectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or O U O (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (~) habitat or other sensitive natural community ,identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C_~ C J Cn S 5° Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Signifianl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp 9 a°ienbany s~ea~ficam win Mrtigabon Tnan Significant No 1 an Into tea ~ n ~ an c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife speces or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () (/) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with industrial uses The site has been previously disrupted during (construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the pro/ect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on the site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are eight trees on the protect site that would require removal to construct the proposed pro/ect, therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit (Related file DRC2004-00804) and Arborist Report dated July 20, 2004, prepared by Steve F Andresen Arborist Services that describes the health of the trees and identifies opportunities for preservation Of the eight trees, only two trees can be successfully transplanted The protect design proposes extensive landscaping with at least 20 percent of the tree planting schedule comprised of 24-inch box size or larger trees Therefore, the impact is considered less-than-sig nifican t 1) The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified as trees #1 and #2, respectively, on the site plan submitted with the Arborist Report, to suitable c-,s 5t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fotenbally Sigmficanl WM MNgabon man Slgnifipnt No I C In letl I cl I tl locations on-site. The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique O (/) O ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those () () () (/) interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original n L J r~ L_J S 5a- Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less men Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g rotanually Sgnifirant wtl, MNgetlan man Significant No I ct Inco ted I cl I h illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area Is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-Influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site Is undedain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be Implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring Is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is In an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by (construction of infrastructure, surrounding developments, and annual discing for weed abatement) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would fhe project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, Including the risk of loss, Intury, or death Involving I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (~) Cs; S 53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 11 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sigmfirant wM MNgahon Than Significant No I Li In ted ~ Li ~ n w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction ro) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial sod erosion or the loss of () (/) () ( ) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (/) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Bwldmg Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have sods incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes about 1 75 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 75 miles to the northwest These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is about 8 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is about 10 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwldmg Code wail ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subiect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~g emissions from the site during such episodes. G; S 5~P L~ Inltlal Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Signifion~ Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenWly s9,,,mm~, WM lALpaeon Than Siprvflrant No i a m iea i a i a 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construction areas that remain mactrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally assoaated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechmcal hazardous area or other unstable geologic umt or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Sail types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam Sod association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Sod types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam Sod assocation according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and Generai Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These sods are typically stable No adverse impacts are anticpated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous matenals into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous matenals, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an_ existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a hst of O O O (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Secbon 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect areal f) For a protect within the viandy of a pnvate airstnp, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impalr implementatwn of or physically interfere wilh O O O (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan (s; S 55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 13 Less men slgnfirant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g raanueuy Signifi®nl vnm A4tlQatlm Tien 9pmfirenl Na i m Asa i a i a h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wddlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands7 Comments• a) The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is mare comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergences Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and schools No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The Cdy particpates m a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance wdh Federal, State, and local regulations concemng the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than sigmficant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 0 25 mile of the protect site The protect site is located about 0 3 mile from a private school, including preschool, (Pebbles Christian School) at 7690 Archibald Avenue Also, the site is located about 0 5 mile south of the nearest existing or proposed public school (Rancho Cucamonga Middle School) at 10022 Feron Boulevard The proposed buldings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed pro/ect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated ' e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Avport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the Cdys westerly limits No impact is anticipated C~ G,~S~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Poten4ally Significant Wih MNgeban Than Signifimnt No I ad Ineb letl I d 1 d g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which Is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract In the event of a disaster Because the protect Includes at least two points of public street access and Is required to comply with all appilcable Clty codes, Including local fire ordinances, no adverse Impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire In the Urban Wlldland Interface area found In the northern part of the Clty according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Pian Exhibit V-7 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the protect () () () (/) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () (/) () ( ) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit In aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, In a manner, which would result In substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff In a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quallty~ () () () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () ( ) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () ( ) structures that would impede or redirect flood flows I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () ( ) loss, Intury or death involving Flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? G; S 5'~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 15 Less man Signfirant Less Issues and Supporting Infonnation Sources POleneally $ignfimnl WiM MNgatlon Than SlgMfiwnt No I cl Inc tea 1 d I ct t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflowv I () I () I () I (/) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) and well not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor well it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mitigation measure shall be implemented ~) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscepe proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscepe areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscepe proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on or off-site No impacts are anticipated • G, S ~8" u Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Signifinnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenhally Significant WiM MNgaLOn Than Signifipnt No I tl Inro te0 I d I d f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality Impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, Is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a pro/ect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. C 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 4) Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly condition through a regular program of sweeping and litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers. 5) Below grade loading docks for warehouse/distribution centers of fresh food items will drain through water quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative. 6) Building and grounds maintenance includes care of landscaped areas around the facility, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the storm drainage system. 7) Outdoor storage of items primarily used by the tenant shall be discouraged. In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the materials shall be kept in areas originally designed and designated for storage. 8) Outdoor storage of materials for rehabilitation, remodeling, and improvements shall be placed in designated areas at the time the work is to be done. An area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surface. The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area. Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area. Larger materials such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy winds. g) Trash containers shall be covered at all times. The exterior of the containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept clean of debris. Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the Cri S 5~' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 17 Less Than Sig,afipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotenhally Significant wm MN~hon Than Significant No I cl In teC I cl I cl site. Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done with the appropriate cleaning materials. All drainage from the building and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area. Building roof drains shall be connected to the underground storm drain system or adtoining pavement drains located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the protect a) Physically diwde an established commurnty~ O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (/) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by industrial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for industrial use as well This project will be of similar design and size to the industrial development to the south and west The project will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site land use designation is General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 As the project is located adjacent to an existing railroad line, the site layout and the individual design of the buildings incorporates features that allows future rail access and use, including a C.T~ i Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Lesa Than SIpNfi®nt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polen4ally SIBNficent With ALIIBe00n Than $ignifimnt No I a to tea I a I a dedicated area for the potential construction of a rail spur The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anhapated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally () () () (/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11 NOISE Would the protect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () (/) () ( ) levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect? d) A substanbal temporary or periodic increase in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels J ~~ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 19 gym, rnd, awe ~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~r M„~tl~ s~; ~,,,, No ~ ~~ ~~ i i f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out The City's Development Code regwres that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed bwlding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts. 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures wdl reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be requred 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, d heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The proposed industrial bwldings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time The City's Development Code regwres that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed budding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial uses is expected However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review . each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. As such, no impacts are anticipated ~ S ~ a- Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than 9gnifimnt less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g aaennallr SgNficant w,ln MNBafian Than Significant No I cl In tetl I d I C c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated ambient noise levels within the viandy of the protect d) See a)response above The proposed to increase the e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the Cdy's westerly hinds No impact is anticpated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () () (/) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments• a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance obfectives for any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) Cr, 5(03 . Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 21 Leis Than Sipmfleant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pm<n4ally Slpnifirant w,m MNgatlan man Sigrufiranl Na I aq In led I tl I d d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments. a) The site, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, would be served by the San Bernardlno Road Flre Station #2 located to the north about 2 miles from the protect site at 9612 San Bernardlno Road The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facllltles or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no Impacts to fire services well occur No Impacts are anticipated b) Additional ponce protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and well not have a substantial Increase In property to be patrolled as the protect site Is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site Is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and Chaffey Joint Union Hlgh School District The protect will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State taw prior to the Issuance of building permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is In a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park (Golden Oak Park) is located less than 0 5 mile to the west of the protect site at 9345 Golden Oak Road The protect will not regwre the construction of any new facllltles or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline In the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facllltles A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No Impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect well utilize exlsting public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facllltles or alteratlon of any existing facllltles or cause a decllne In the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facllltles Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected Increase In library space under the General Plan well not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on Ilbrary services as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the Clty has planned a new Ilbrary within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is In excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect Include recreational facllltles or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facllltles, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment G,~~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Las Than Sigtlfipnt Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources sgmfin'ni AL ~~ eon Sign pnt No i a m lea i a i a Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park (Golden Oak Park) is located less than 0 5 mile to the west of the protect site at 9345 Golden Oak Road This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational faalities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are antiapated b) See a)response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would thepro~ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capaaty of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level () () () (/) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted polices, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent wdh the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in prolect design The prolect wdl not create a substantial mcrease in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be requved to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per Cdy roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of bwldmg permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary tc support adequate traffic crculation No impacts are anticpated ~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less iTen 9pnfiranl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sagnifi~ni w tenon s~ ~t No Inpaa Inm,paateE Lryed liryaa b) This light industrial protect will generate 132 two-way peak hour trips (non-retail, industrial) and, therefore, is below the 250 two-way peak hour trips threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) cntena for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The design of the protect provides two driveways for emergency vehicle access on to the site and will, therefore, have adequate emergency access No impacts are anbcipated f) The protect design includes 237 parking stalls which is in excess of the 228 required parking stalls, and will comply with the standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the () () () (/) protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effectsT c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () (/) ( ) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed L._J G, s ~ ~ r1 Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Leu TYan Signfimnt Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources PP 9 Pulentlally Sgnlflonl WiN MNgaYOn Than Sgnifipnt No I d In feE 1 cY I tl e) Resuft in a determination by the wastewater ~) ~) ~) ~/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ~) ~) ~) ~/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ~) ~) ~) ~/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated • f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated ~~ ~ ~,~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 25 Las Thin Significant Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant win MNgatlon Than Sigmfionl Na I tl In tetl I d I cY 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mafor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and t5096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts L_J r~ I~ ~i f ~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained m this Inibal Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are avadabie for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • (T) Industrial Area Speafic Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Damon Engmeering, March 30, 2004) (T) Dramage Report (Damon Engineering, Apnl 5, 2004) (T) Arbonst Report (Steven F Andresen Arbonst Services, July 20, 2004) G-,5~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature '~~~~~~"~'~'~~~ Date rc$ 8 Zonj Pnnt Name and Title Mo7ndL/ /Lar2/1~.uo O!/N.t;(~. h~GENT i ~-,s ~~ C City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The /ollowing Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Project File No : TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445ANDDEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 Public Review Penod Closes. March 23, 2005 Project Name: Protect Applicant. Mark Capellmo Protect Location (also see attached map): 9850 6th Street - APN 0209-211-19 Project Description: Subdivision of a 7 27 acre parcel into 11 parcels for the development of 11 mdustnal office/warehouse bwldings totaling 126,843 square feet in the General Industnal District (Subarea 5) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment • If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Envvonmental Impact Report wdl not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review period. March 23. 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~ RESOLUTION NO 05-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445, A REQUESTTO SUBDIVIDE A7.27ACRE PARCEL INTO 11 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5), LOCATED AT 9850 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0209-211-19. A. Recitals 1. Marls Capellmo, on behalf of Cap Brothers Construction, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of March, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal preregwsdes prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, d is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 23, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to vacant properly m the General Industrial (GI) District, (Subarea 5), located on the north side of 6th Street, about 950 feet east of Arohibald Avenue; b. The application proposes the subd~ws~on of 1 parcel of 316,859 square feet (7 27 acres) into 11 parcels ranging in size between 16,255 square feet (Parcel 6) and 51,996 square feet (Parcel 1); and c. The subtect properly has a street frontage along 6th Street of 370 feet with an overall width of 665.41 feet and an overall depth of 615.86 feet, and d. The properties to the south, east, and west are fully improved with industrial/office development. The properties to the north are partially developed with industrial development (the remainder are vacant); and e. The properties to the north, south, and east are zoned General Industrial (GI) District, (Subarea 5), and the properties to the west are zoned General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 4; and ~-,s ~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 2 f. The application is in conjunction with the development of 11 industnal buildings (related file: Development Review DRC2003-01185), with a combined floorarea of 126,&43 square feet; and g. The subdivision, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings offacts setforth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c. The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows' a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance Hnth the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significent environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significent effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as cond~Uons of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considenng the record as a whole, the G, S ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 3 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Calriomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subiect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of 1 parcel into 11 parcels. 2) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the protect Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) 3) Tree Removal Permd DRC2004-00804 is hereby approved with the condition that preservation of the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified in the arbonst report as trees #1 and #2, respectively, are relocated to suitable locations on-site. The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. Enoineenno Department 1) Full frontage improvements shall be installed at the local industnai width (curb face 22 feet from centerline of street, in-line with existing curb face on Parcel 1, PM15948) including asphalt pavement to centerline of street, curb and gutter, drive approach, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, three (3) 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights and traffic signing and striping. a) Curvilinear sidewalk and street trees shall be installed to accommodate the ultimate width of 6th Street (curb face 32-feet measured from centerline). b) Drive approach to be per City Standard No.101, Type C and be a minimum of 35 feet wide. Curvilinear sidewalk shall cross the drive approach at the 0" curb face (non-contiguous sidewalk). c) Main north/south dnveway shall align with the existing dnveway on the south side of 6th Street. Centerline offset between the proposed dnveway and the existing dnveway across the street shall not exceed 10 feet. G, 5 ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 4 2) Eventually, Sixth Street will be widened to a secondary arterial. While it may be impractical to install these improvements at this width now, development will be required to: a) Design on-site improvements to accommodate the ultimate width of 6th Street (curb 32 feet from centerline). Orient on-site improvements to work with both the interim and ultimate street improvements. b) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1/2-foot behind the ultimate right-0f-way (44-feet measured from centerline of 6th Street and dedicated on Parcel Map 15948) along the whole street frontage. 3) The existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical, except for the 66kV electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be under-grounded along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15948, extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be under-grounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for under rounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the propertyfrom adjacent areas. Drainage from the north shall be collected and conveyed in PCC drainage devices, around proposed buildings to on-site facilibes and eventually to discharge onto 6th Street. 5) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Public Improvement Plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to Building Permit issuance. 6) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permit, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan. Also, have appropriate WQMP "TEMPLATE" Attachments regarding responsible person(s) for maintenance and operations of the BMP's recorded with the County of San Bernardino, and provide copy of recorded document to the Engineering Department pnorto issuance of Grading Permits. G, S' ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 5 7) Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WOMP shall be addressed in the project CC&R's. 8) Where applicable, obtain and provide off-site entry nghts to grade on adjacent properties including the railroad easement(s). 9) Provide wntten confinnation from railroad company regarding any proposed grading adjacent to their easement along existing spur Imes; reference Grading Plan Submittal -Sections C, D and E. 10) Decorative paving on site shall not encroach onto the ultimate nght-0f-way for 6th Street. Environmental Mitioation Aesthetics 1) Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination is confined within the project site. Glare shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of indirect lighting. A Photometnc Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval. Aii Qualify 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating wndition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speaficaUons. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern California fur Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall complywith SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: lTi S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 6 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. • Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City ff silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon Ume of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabdizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction~rading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (~.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercal facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. G, s ~`? PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO . March 23, 2005 Page 7 12) All industhal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified as trees #1 and #2, respectively, on the site plan submitted with the Arborist Report, to suitable locations on-site. The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified arohaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey • of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be ~i S 1.~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 8 appropnate. Where mitigation monitonng is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth~isturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth{listurbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be Veated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. . 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the protect where appropnate. Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration inGude Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bncks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect descnption and identifying Best . Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural ~S; S r I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 9 measures consistent with the Gwdelmes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or pawng permits, applicant shall submd to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence thatthis has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identificetion Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 4) Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly condition through a regular program of sweeping and litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers. 5) Below grade loading docks for warehouse/disthbution centers of fresh food items shall dram through water quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative 6) Building and grounds maintenance includes care of landscaped areas around the faality, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the storm drainage system. 7) Outdoor storage of dems primanly used by the tenant shall be discouraged. In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the matenals shall be kept m areas ongmally designed and designated for storage. 8) Outdoor storage of matenals for rehabilitation, remodeling, and improvements shall be placed m designated areas at the time the work is to be done. An area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surface. The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area. Smaller matenals, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept m a covered area. Larger matenals such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy vends. 9) Trash containers shall be covered at all times. The extenor of the containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept clean of debns. Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the sde. Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done with the appropnate cleaning matenals. All drainage from the bwldmg and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area. Bwldmg roof drams shall be connected G, S $~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-23 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 10 to the underground stone dram system or adjoining pavement drams located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level morntonng as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building OffiGal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance Meth above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck delrvenes shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at anytime on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary ~iJ O~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-23 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 11 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES• COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS. c~- City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelmes. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Fonns to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Fonn wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation v~nll be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~-,3~3 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 . Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the project planner 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Fonn After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn. 6 Unantiapated circumstances may anse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitonng after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Department shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances regwnng long-tenn project monitonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits. G, ~ ~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 Applicant: Cap Brothers Construction Initial Studv Prepared by MIKE SMITH Date: March 16. 2005 . e th . ' ' Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensur e that illumination is confined within the prolect site Glare CP shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of g Review of plans A/C yq indirect lighting A Photometric Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval Air Quality ~ < . ' , " , t` , ~a y, •. a~~r r3t r? L' .'. ,1"~ ` _ `N 'ahh ya~'3_ ~~~. ' „$'- _'^i t- n W All construction egw ment sh ll b „ ,° ~ -~^y~ ~ Hai ~ ~ ~ p a e maintained in pod 9 CP C Rev f l operating condition so as to reduce operational iew o p ans A/C yq emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP/BO C Rewew of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment wdl be utilized, or that their use was inves4gated and found to be infeasible for the prolect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of plans A/C Z4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray N ~ 1 ~i i ~`1 y ~' All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO g _ _ _ noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 Review of plans A/C 2 All construction egwpment shall com l h p y wit SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall BO C Review of plans A/C yq include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the con t t s ruc ion site th BO C R rough seeding and watering eview of plans A/C y4 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site h l au roads • Phase grading to prevent the susc t bil t BO BO C Review of plans A/C y4 ep i i y of large C R areas to erosion over extended penods of time eview of plans A/C yq • Schedule activities to minimize th BO e amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of C Review of plans A/C 2~q work penods • Dispose of surplus ex t d BO cava e material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound C Review of plans A 4 engineering practices • Sweep streets accordin t h d g o a sc e ule established BO C D r by the City rf silt is carved over to adjacent public ing u A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend radin t g g opera ions during high words p e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements construction • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During q haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction 4 swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During q 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2 of 9 U ,.7 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO -. C _ ., - , RWOCB) shall be applied to ail inactive constructi During q 4 on areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize el t BO ec ric or clean lt C R a ernative fuel powered egwpment where feasible eview of plans A/C q The construction contractor shall BO ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement th t C Review of plans A/C yq a work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All industrial and commercial faaliti h ll es s a post signs regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged BO C Review of plans A q periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial faciliti h ll es s a designate CP C R preferential parking for vanpools eview of plans A/C y3 All industrial and commercial t t si e enants with 50 or CP C R more employees shall be required to post both bus and eview of plans D y3 Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas Ali industrial and comm l ercia site tenants with 50 or CP C Revi f l more employees shall be requred to configure then ew o p ans D p/3 operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible ' : u- Biological - - ~ , ~ n.~ ~ , . ,:, - - ~. r ~~ t The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta CP D Review of plans A/D y3 (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acertolia (London Plane Tree), identified as trees #1 and #2, respectroely, on the site plan submitted with the Arborist Report, to swtable locations on-site The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval 3 ~ S C~ 5~ .. Cultural Resources ~ ~ -~ ,, ,, , , ` ~ If any preh~stonc arch l aeo ogical resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measure t CPBO s o protect undesignated t C Review of report A/D 3/4 si es from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse prolect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the prolect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 4 of 9 1- .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mtigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the , followrng measures • Assign a paleontological montor, trained and CP B Revew of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Revew of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing actiwties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Revew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods - - ^ y _ The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wmd BO/CE C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes 5 ~ • ~l ~ ~ . •. . .. Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain rnactrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PMro emissions. • a Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/CID Review of plans A/C 2l4 be Integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration mGude Dutch drams, precast concrete lattice blocks and bucks, terraces, drversrons, runoff spreaders, seepage pds, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submd to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), inGuding a protect descnption and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identitythe structural and non-structural measures consistent wdh the Gwdehnes for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Pertnrt from the Slate Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General ConsWction Permit 6of9 ,~ vl ~ Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly CP -~ E . ., condition through a regular program of sweeping and As needed C ~ litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers Below grade loading docks for warehou /d t se is ribution t CE g R cen ers of fresh food items shall drain through water eview of plans A/C yq quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative Bwlding and grounds maintenance i l d nc u es care of CP E landscaped areas around the faality, cleaning of parking As needed q ~ lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the storm drainage system Outdoor storage of items primaril d b y use y the tenant CP/BO B/E R shall be discouraged In the event that outdoor stora e eview of plans A/C yon g cannot be avoided, the materials shall be kept in areas originally designed and designated for storage Outdoor stora e of t l g ma eria s for rehabilitation, remodeling and im rov t h CPBO B/E During A/C 2/q!7 , p emen s s all be placed in designated areas at the time the work is to be done An construction area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surtace The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area Larger materials such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy winds • ~ .. • • ~ . .. ~. .. . . Trash containers shall be covered at all times The CP B/E Review of plans A/C 7 exterior of the containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept Gean of debris Inspection shall t>e on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the sde Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done vmth the appropriate Leaning materials All drainage from the building and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area Butlding roof drains shall be connected to the underground storm drain system or adtoining pavement drains located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction q inGuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards speafied in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hve a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Bwlding Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Offipal Nnthin 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notdy the Building Offiaal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 8of9 -• .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During q q hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction /~ including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible , the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings u~j lJ" Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person • ~ ~ Monltoring,Frequency_~-s MethodMofxVerlfication~r-.-~~~°-~:_"';"~~~ ~ . t a anctlons~'`"'; `` ~ =~• - g CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development . ~~ ~ ~., A - On-site Inspection >~ r 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B • Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Ciry Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9 i i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 SUBJECT: SUBDIVIDE A 7 27 ACRE PARCEL INTO 11 PARCELS APPLICANT: MARK CAPELLINO (CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION) LOCATION: 9850 6TH STREET, APN 0209-211-19 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-23, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations SC-11-04 Comoletion Date ~~. _/~- / / / / ~,s a~ Protect No SUBTPM16445 Completion Date D. E. F 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner ~ 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwldmg Code and _/~_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwldmg and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submttted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~_1_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance. 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submttted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and vrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and ~ submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 The final design of perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the requred landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 474 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for fortett Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits SC-1-04 2 ~i~ _L~ Protect No SUBTPM76445 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, . FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1 Submit froe complete sets of plans including the following ~~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM16445) clearly identdied on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report _/~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~_/_ . the City prior to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls ~-/- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/~_ Bulding and Safety Department H. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM16445) The applicant shall comply with the - latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulaUOns in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or ~_/ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to. City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays . SC-1-04 J Prgect No SUBTPM16445 Completion Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ~~ counter) ~ 1. New Structures 1. Provde compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances -J.~- considenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Provde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance vnth CBC ~-J- Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/~_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/~ J. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading _/~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_/_ pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/ / time of application for grading plan check . 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bulding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ~_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civtl Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~_/_ street centerline) 44 total feet on 6th Street -/~- -/~- 2 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved -/_J- 3 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Point maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded pnor to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map SC-1-04 4 ~,san Protect No SUBTPM76445 Comole4on Date 4 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 5 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map L. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing morethan one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other 6th Street X X (c) X X X (e) • Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) curbisde drain outlets Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wrong Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer SC-1-04 ~~~~ ~_~- ~-~- _/~_ ~-~- -~-~- ~-~- -/~_ ~~- Protect No SUBTPM16445 Completion Date Notes 1) 2) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIty Engineer Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the CIty Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the Cltys street tree program Install street trees per CIty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Spaee Spacing Slze Gty 6th Street No common Name Planting Areas of 1) 8' or more Magnolia grandiflora'Matestic Beauty' 8' 30' 15 Gal OC 2) 8' or less Magnolia grandifiora'St Mary' 3' 20 ' 15 Gal O C Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the CIty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the CIty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the CIty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required a -~-~- _/~_ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- _/_J- SC-1-04 G,~a~ Prgect No SUBTPM16445 Comolefion Date M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to Loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Cary Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer N. Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the property from adtacentareas O. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for 6th Street P. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdmsion or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them C). General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance rf no map is involved Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid forthe Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -/-/- _/~/_ / / / / ~~- ~~- / / ~-/- ~~- sC-t-oa 7 ~; S ~U~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT ~ STANDARD CONDITIONS October 7, 2004 6th Industnal Project 6th St. between Archibald and Hermosa (12) Parcel Project DRC2003-01185 & SUBTPM16445 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commeraal/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b The preferred locations for fire hydrants are. i At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, Industnal or residential project from the public roadways. u At intersections. ni On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,125 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. ~~I 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provde the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 All structures that do not meet Fve Distract access regwrements (see Fve Access). 3 When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 4 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be spnnklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The California Bwlding Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fue sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system. Plan check approval and a building permit are required Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system Plans and specfications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7. Location of Access. All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 ~~ ~,Q~ 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are. a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a In buildings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all require openings. 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings. 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a. The gate shall slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width. c When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates are not required to be motorized Motorized gates must have a manual over ride or battery back up 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application # 05822 & # 05842 must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 3 S t.Q3 FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding • construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be requred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Produang Processes and Operations Explosive or Blasting Agents Flammable and Combustible Liquids Frwt Ripening Plants Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Magnesium Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 4 G S lD~k 1 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with th provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (~ working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Budding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has review and approved (2) applications for Alternate Methods. Per Alt. Method # 5822 Buildings 10 & 11 must be constructed with a sprinkler system capable of protecting a high hazard classification commodity stored in racks up to 20'. Per Alt. Method # 5842 Buildings 2, 4, 6, & 8 sprinklers systems may be supplied from the hydrant loop. FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement• The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access a. Crosses a property line. b Is shared by multiple owners, and c. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino 2. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 ~'~ S ~ 0.5 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required pnvate fire mains or appurtenances • a. Crosses a property line b. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, and c. Is shared by multiple owners Please prowde a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorders Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fve) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the revew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fue hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delvenng any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 6 ~; S ~ ~ ~ PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services: "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire Ime contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpmen is placed in service. Fire Alarm System' Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways• Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch mirnmum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial ~iS ~~~ and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. • 11. Hazardous Materials: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information° form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 13 Mapping Site Plan: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17° site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector J i G, S ~g RESOLUTION NO 05-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP 11 INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS TOTALING 126,843 SQUARE FEET ON 7.27 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5), LOCATED AT 9850 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:0209-211-19. A. Rentals 1 Mark Capellino, on behalf of Cap Brothers Construction, filed an application for approval of Development Rewew DRC2003-01185, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 23, 2005, the Plamm~g Commission of the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on March 23, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the development of 11 office/warehouse buddingswith a combined floor area of 126,843 square feet on a property of 316,859 square feet (7.27 acres); and b This application is in contuncUon with the subdivision of the subject parcel into 11 parcels (related file• Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445). One budding will be constructed on each mdiwdual parcel; and c. • The properties to the south, east, and west of the subtect site are fully improved with industnal development, while the properties to the north are partially improved with mdusthal development (the remainder are vacant), and d. The subject properly has a street frontage along 6th Street of 370 feet, overall width of 665.41 feet and overall depth of 615.86 feet; and e. The subtect site is vacant; and f Vegetation on the subtect site is limited to low grasses and a grouping of eight trees at the south side of the site; and ~i~ ~~ I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 2 g. One point of primary and one point of emergency access into the site will be provided from 6th Street; and h. Adjacent, and parellel~to, the east property Ime is a north-south railroad line, and i. Consistent with the Rail Service Standards outlined in Section 17.30.040.F, a portion of the subtect site with the dimensions of 25 feet wide by 615.86 feet long immediately adjacent, and parallel to, the existing railroad easement shall be unencumbered with structures, paving, and outdoor storage or similar uses, and Bwldmgs 1, 3, and 5, as they are the closest to the rail line will incorporate knock-out panels on their east elevations; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and conGudes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and development Code; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectves of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vanity. 4. Based upon the facts and infonnaUon contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaretion and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all sigmficent effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the ~S ~~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-24 ' DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 3 proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannma Deoartment 1) Approval is for the consWction of 11 bwldings with a combined floor area of 126,843 square feet 2) Outdoor eating areas shall have an overhead, decorative trellis shade structure, tables, chairs/benches, and trash receptacles. 3) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adtacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet 4) All roof- and ground-mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view from surrounding properties and the public right-of-way. Screening shall be architecturally compatible with the proposed building. The location of Southern Califomia Edison transformer(s) shall be shown on the plans submitted for Building and Safety plan check. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the extenor on any of the buildings elevations. All downspouts shall be routed through the intenor of the building. 6) The maximum height of any wall or fence in this development district is 8 feet. Chain link fencing is not permitted; perimeter walls/fences shall be constructed of wrought iron, concrete block, tilt-up concrete panels, or equivalent as approved by the City Planner W here walls/fences are placed above retaining walls, the calculated height of the overall wall/fence combination shall not exceed 8 feet. 7) A minimum of 228 parking stalls shall be provided for the overall site. 8) Parking stalls shall have a minimum width of 9 feet and a minimum depth of 18 feet (1-foot overhang into landscaped areas is permitted). Truck trailer parking stalls shall have a minimum width of 14 feet and minimum depth of 50 feet CJi~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 4 9) All matenals, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within the budding orstorage area. Such storage areas within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened. All screens and/or enclosures are subiect to City Planner approval. 10) The portion of the property, with dimensions of about 25 feet wide by 615 feet long, that is reserved for a potential red spur that is located along, and parallel to, the east property line and duectly adjacent to the east side of Buildings 1, 3, 5, and 7 shall be landscaped with ground cover, and an appropriate irrigation system shall be installed. In addition, a grouping of trees (minimum 36-inch box) and shrubs shall be planted in the landscaped area adiacent to Budding 1 and behind the proposed screen wall that will be located at the southeast comerof Building 1. The use of this potential rail spur area for vehicle access, truck loading/unloading, matenals storage, vehicle parking, orany type of similar activity is not permitted. 11) The employees' outdoor eating area immediately in front of Buildings 7 and 9 shall incorporate a water fountain, benches, and creative landscaping. 12) Decorative paving shall be provided at the primary entrance to the sde, behind the public right-of-way The decoratively paved area shall have a minimum depth of 35 feet and width equal to that of the driveway. 13) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 is hereby approved with the condition that preservation of the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified in the arbonst report as trees #1 and #2, respectively, are relocated to swtable locations on-sde. The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. 14) Landscaping provided shall be consistent with the standards described in Section 17.30.040.E of the Development Code. Detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted, at the time of plan check, to the Planning Department for review and approval. The Detailed Landscape and Imgation Plans must be approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15) All landscaping shall be installed prior to release for occupancy. 16) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated in the proiect's Conditions, Covenants, and Restnctrons (CC&R's) Enctineenna Department 1) Full frontage improvements shall be installed at the local industrial width (curb face 22 feet from centerline of street, in-line wrath existing G,S ~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 5 curb face on Parcel 1, PM15948) including asphalt pavement to centerline of street, curb and gutter, dnve approach, curvilinear sidewalk, sVeet Vees, three (3) 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights and Vaffic signing and striping. a) Curvilinear sidewalk and street trees shall be installed to accommodate the ultimate width of 6th SVeet (curb face 32 feet measured from centerline) b) Dnve approach to be per City Standard No 101, Type C and be a minimum of 35 feet wide Curvilinear sidewalk shall cross the dnve approach at the 0" curb face (non-contiguous sidewalk). c) Main north/south driveway shall align with the existing driveway on the south side of 6th Street. Centerline offset between the proposed dnveway and the existing dnveway across the street shall not exceed 10 feet 2) Eventually, 6th SVeet will be widened to a secondary artenal While it may be impractical to install these improvements at this width now, development vnll be required to• a) Design on-site improvements to accommodate the ultimate width of 6th SVeet (curb 32-feet from centerline). Onent on-site improvements to work with both the intenm and ultimate street improvements b) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1/2-foot behind the ultimate right-of-way (44 feet measured from the centerline of 6th,Street and dedicated on Parcel Map 15948) along the whole sVeet frontage. 3) The existing overhead utilities (communications and electrical, except for the 66kV electrical) on the protect side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15948, extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be under-grounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for under-grounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from ad/scent areas. Drainage from the north shall be collected and conveyed in PCC drainage G,5 ll3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 . Page 6 devices, around proposed bwidings to on-site facilities, eventually discharging onto 6th Street. 5) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Public Improvement Plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed bythe developer, priorto Building Permit issuance. 6) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permit, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan. Also, have appropriate WQMP "TEMPLATE" Attachments regarding responsible person(s) for maintenance and operations of the BMP's recorded with the County of San Bernardino, and provide copy of recorded document to the Engineering Department pnorto issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the prolect Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs). 8) Where applicable, obtain and provide off-site entry rights to grade on adjacent properties, including the railroad easement(s). 9) Provide written confirmation from railroad company regarding any proposed grading adjacent to their easement along existing spurlines, reference Grading Plan Submittal -Sections C, D and E. 10) Decorative paving on-site shall not encroach onto the ultimate right-0f--way for 6th Street. Environmental Mitigation Aesthetics 1) Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination is confined within the project site. Glare shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of indirect lighting. A Photometric Plan shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval. Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all consUuction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as permanufacturers'specificeUons. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permts, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and GS 1~~k PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 7 protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-sde haul roads. • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. • Schedule acUwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City'rf silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other sudable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. ~-,S LLS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO • March 23, 2005 Page 8 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction~rading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercal faalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercal faalities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Brologrcal Resources 1) The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified as trees #1 and #2, respectroely, on the site plan submitted with the Arbonst Report, to swtable locations on-site. The new location of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporebon of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeaal qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage. ~i~ ~~~0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 9 Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations to The San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrucUon field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submd a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitonng) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation momtonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilwng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the Cdy to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions G, ~ l ~`1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 10 Hydrology and Water Qualrty 1) Structures to retain preapitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate Measures that maybe used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a prolect description and idenUfytng Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the stone drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or pawng permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System . (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit 4) Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly condition through a regular program of sweeping and litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers 5) Below grade loading docks for warehouse/distribution centers of fresh food items shall dram through water quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative. 6) Bwlding and grounds maintenance includes care of landscaped areas around the faality, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the stone drainage system. 7) Outdoor storage of items primarily used by the tenant shall be discouraged In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the materials shall be kept in areas originally designed and designated for storage. 8) Outdoor storage of materials for rehabilitation, remodeling, and improvements shall be placed in designated areas at the time the work is to be done. An area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage sWctures, and on a paved surface The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic G;S llg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 11 sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area. Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area Larger materials such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy winds. 9) Trash containers shall be covered at all times. The exterior of the containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept clean of debris. Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the site. Spilis shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done with the appropriate cleaning materials. All drainage from the budding and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area. Budding roof drains shall be connected to the underground stone dram system or adjoining pavement drams located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-sde transportation of trash. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Momtonng at other times maybe required by the Budding Offical. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours; however, if nose levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Offical. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwUes shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday ora national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. ~Ti ~ l ~-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-24 DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 12 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chainnan ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of March 2005, by the folloHnng vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES. COMMISSIONERS' ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: ~1 LJ fir, S `a.,O City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~ I ~..1 Mitigation Monitonng Program DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 Page 2 3 Appropnate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activties and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may anse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planneror responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forns of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitgation measure for the regwred penod of time In those instances requinng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits ~~S~~.a MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 Applicant: Cap Brothers Construction Initial Studv Prepared by MIKE SMITH Date: March 16. 2005 U ((~,~ ~l' . , ~ . .. Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination is confined within the protect sde Glare CP B Review of plans A/C Z4 shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of indirect lighting A Photometric Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval "Air Quality' . ,,„~" ~~ y~'~~'^`~~ ~.,,~;ti~~~. ,~ , ~ ~x ~, uYe V All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that ail construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venhcauon Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CPBO C Review of plans C 2 shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCA~MD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 1 of 9 (1 U .. • -. .. . . All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish round c h g over on t e construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Revew of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C areas to erosion over extended periods of time Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of BO C Revew of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if sdt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance wdh construction SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements ' • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads usrng tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance wRh SCAQMD Rule 403 2 ~~ s i .. .. .. , Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and ... BO C _ . .. RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactiv t Dunng q q e cons ruction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall t l BO u i ize electric or clean C R alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible eview of plans A/C q The construction contractor h ll BO s a ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement th t k C Review of plans A/C yq a wor crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All industrial and commer i l f l c a aci ities shall post signs BO C R f regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged eview o plans A q periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and com l f mercia acilities shall designate CP C Rev f l preferential parking for vanpools iew o p ans A/C y3 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Review of plans D y3 Metrotink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D y3 more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible <. . , t . ` : , ar , W. l"A~nk ,~ . 3 '_ a 1 ~~..',• The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta CP D Review of plans A/D y3 (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acertolia (London Plane Tree), identified as trees #1 and #2, respectnrely, on the site plan submitted with the Arborist Report, to suitable locations on-site The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submilted to the City for review and approval 3 of 9 ' ~ ~ ~ _ , Cultural Resources ~ " . _='~ . y ,~~.yu ~ ~ ~5=` .•• ~}i. .~'"~3,3 ~~ ~ ~ F ~ Z+'ryY~~.~ '"`~~:N*~ ~ ~ ~ ahbsY"~,°:. z°."~e, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,€+ Ykm" ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,Ak_.,'~pe N ~~ If an y prehistoric archaeol l .~° ~ ", ~ ,~, a x -,.y ogica resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to r t t CPBO p o ec undesignated sites from demolitio C Review of report A/D 3/4 n or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishin CPBO g provisions to regwre C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/D - 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend d t CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 con i ions of approval to eliminate adverse protect S effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 4 p~ • s ~ .. .. . .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruc4on f CP B Review of report '~ 4 ield survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate W here mitgation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. • Assign a paleontolo l CP gica monitor, trained and B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time durng the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C A/D or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Review of report 4 elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology d,Sod~,` `~'• r ` ';°r a' w;~c'"~x.,~zrr.~s an ' ' .r ~~ f~,~,~~ ,x~ ,'~ . ~: ~•~ ~~a r ~ a . ~ ~ ~, ~. ~,~ ~ r ,_ ,. ~» _ o „~ l~. .... _ x.r.c '~ UJ L"XSZ 'd'r sc~.,~ks `L#n41kL`A" ~ ~ e'6 ~`tiax ~, ax,_ t, x~~l':.. The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C Durng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes 5of9 (~ oC .. .. -. Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions r Structures to retain precipdation and runoff on-sde shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C yq be integrated into the design of the protect where appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/q submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifNng Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practiceble The W OMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prwr to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to the Cdy Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identficetion Number) shall be submitted to the Cdy Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Perind s s• • n~ _ ~. ' Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly CP E As needed C condition through a regular program of sweeping and 7 litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers Below grade loadin dock f g s or warehouse/distribution CE B R f l centers of fresh food items shall drain through water eview o p ans A/C p/q quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative Building and grounds maintenance includes care of CP E As needed A 7 landscaped areas around the facility, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the storm drainage system Outdoor storage of items primarily used by the tenant CPBO B/E Review of plans A/C 2/q!7 shall be discouraged In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the materials shall be kept in areas originally designed and designated for storage Outdoor storage of materials for rehabilitation, CP/BO B/E During A/C 2/q!7 remodeling, and improvements shall be placed in construction designated areas at the time the work is to be done An area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surtace The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area Larger materials such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy winds 7 of 9 U G,l c .. . . . .. . . . . ~. ~. ... -. .. Trash containers shall t>e covered at all times The CP B/E Rertew of plans A/C extenor of the containers and the area surrounding the 7 containers shall be kept Gean of debns. Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the site. Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done with the appropnate Leaning materials All drainage from the building and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area Budding roof drains shall be connected to the underground storm drain system or adjoining pavement drams located away from the trash container area Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash ConsWction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During q hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construGion 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hve a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specfed in Development Code Section 17.02 120 Monltonng at other times may be regwred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report then findings to the Budding Official vnthin 24 hours, however, d noise Levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Offical If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance Hnth above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction ~ -. . .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POBO C Dunng A hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction qn I including Saturday, or at any Ume on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, rf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally taps (counting both to and trom the constructlon site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible , the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations `~ Responsible Person CDD -Community Development Director or designee CP C P Monitoring Frequency ~ A -With Each New Development MethodpbVeritlcatlon ' .•,,;st' -'' am lea. A - On-site Inspection ,Sanctions ' - at~..~;~- t -Withhold Recordation of Final Map - ary lanner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 • Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9 of 9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN* STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 11 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS APPLICANT: MARK CAPELLINO (CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION) LOCATION: 9850 6TH STREET; APN• 0209-211-19 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Com letion A. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its ~_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the attemative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-24, Standard ~~_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire If building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations ~ 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-11-t]4 LTi~ ~v~ Protect No DRC2003-01185 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~ ~~_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be • submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submttted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fast 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance. 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are requred and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and ~_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior tc the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _J_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, bermtng, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed to underground vaults 10 Ali building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~_ ' including proper dlumtnation. 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Ctty Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submttted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ~~_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Ctry Planner Details shall be included to building plans 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main ~~_ building colors E. Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts ~_/_ a budding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) SC-1-04 2CT ~ S Protect No DRC2003-01185 Completion Date F. G. 3 All parking spaces shall be double strped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, ~~ and exits shall be striped per City standards ~ 4 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho ~~_ Cucamonga Fue Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercal and office facilities with 25 or more ~~_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/~_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily ~~_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces W arehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces requred exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number rovided for hall be b ld t th l /~ p w ing s o e ose 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking c _ commeraal, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet ' 3 For industrial protects with at least 40 car parking spaces, bicyclist-changing facilities shall be ~~_ provided to encourage bicycle commuting Accessible restrooms with storage lockers for clothing and egwpment shall be sufficient Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier m ~~_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 06 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within ~~_ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one ~_/~ tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding SC-1-04 CTf S l3~ Prgect No DRC2003-01185 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 . slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required bythis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and approprtate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thrroing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 10 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is regwred along 6th Street . 11 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-ot-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined to Chapter 19 16 oT the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code H. Signs ' 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 1. Environmental Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 474 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Cary staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the approprtate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for SC-1-04 CJI~ `~ Completion Dete -J~- ~~_ ~-~- ~-~. ~-~- -/~_ _/~_ ~~. ~-~- _/~- ~-/- Protect No DRC2003-01185 Completion Date mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following. ~_/- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterand waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2003-01185) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. . 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report ~~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are requued prior to plan check submittal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City prior to permit Issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls _1___I- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~_ Bwlding and Safety Department L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ~~_ marked wdh the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-01185) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Caldornia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bulding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to Issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or ~~_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits Issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/~ recordation and prior to Issuance of building permits SC-1-04 ~~ ~ JW Prgect No DRC2003-01185 Comoleaon Date 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~ ~~_ J through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public ___/_/ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califomia Bulding Code for regwred occupancy separations _/~_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~~_ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/~_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed ~~_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with California Bulding Code, City Grading ~~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/~ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Cwil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage faalities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/~_ street centerline) , 44 total feet on 6th Street _/_/_ SC-1-04 l.5 i J ~ ~~ Protect No DRC2003-01185 P. 3 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 4 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of alt common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 5 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Sfreet Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other 6th Street X X (c) X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) curbside drain outlets Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condurt, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Completion Date _/~~ ~-~- _/~- ~~- ~~_ ~-~~ / / ~-~- ~-~_ ~-~- SC-1-04 ~1 J ~ ~~ Protect No DRC2003-01185 Completion Date e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per CIt) Standards or as dvected by the Clty Engineer f Existing Clty roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times wilt adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cast deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refundec upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal forfirst plan check. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon s¢e or larger, shall be installed per City Standards rn accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) ° Where public landscape plans are regwred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer , Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. 6th Street Planting Areas of 1) 8' or More Magnolia grandiflora 'Matestic Beauty 8' 30' IS Gal OC 2) 8' & Less Magnolia grandiflora'St Mary 3' 20' 15 Gal OC Construction Notes for Street Trees Notes: 1) Puii boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 20( feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified SG1-04 1) All street trees are tc be planted In accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, Including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required C~-t5 ~ 3~ ~~_ ~~ ~~. ~~ ~_~_ ~~- ~~. Protect No DRC2003-01185 Completion Date Q R. S. T U. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the ~~ property from adjacent areas Improvement Completion 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, ~~ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for 6th Street Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~~_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/~ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the ___/~_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved ~~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall ~_/ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project SC-1-04 9 ~i~ ~ ~ Protect No DRC2003-01185 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1/. Security Lighting Ali parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunsse and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures W. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wtttun 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices X. Security Fencing All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The tmtial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unrt along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 Y. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibihty. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be a minimum of three feet to length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-oa 10 ,I~ CTt~ ~y' ~~_ ___/_/- ~~- ~~- -/~_ ~~ ~~- ~~_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT i STANDARD CONDITIONS October 7, 2004 6th Industrial Protect 6th St. between Archibald and Hermosa (12) Parcel Protect DRC2003-01185 & SUBTPM16445 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gwdelmes for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commeraal/mdustnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i. At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, mdustnal or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections. ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As required by the Fire Safety Droision to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwldmg c If any portion of a faality or bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 2,125 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances ~-,7 ~~a 2 Pubiic fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radds of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow • 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access). 3 When the building access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 4 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The California Budding Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code require a listed fire sprinkler monitoring Central Station Fire Alarm system Plan check approval and a budding permit are regwred Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fve Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7. Location of Access• All portions of the structures 1 S` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 ~S 1~3 2 Specifications for private Fue District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside tum radws shall be 50-feet d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a. In bwldings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fve District access to all require openings. 4. Access Walkways• Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 CommerciaUlndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire Distract Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a The gate shall slide open horizontally or swing inward. b. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of required width c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet. d Gates are not required to be motorized. Motorized gates must have a manual over ride or battery back up. 6. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application # 05822 & # 05842 must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 3 [S~ ~~ FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building . construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property C • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Fruit Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Burning Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Speaal Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall rewew your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the CaUEPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 4 ~~5 ~~S Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with th provisions. The tenant must prowde a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5~ working days, rf requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has review and approved (2) applications for Alternate Methods. Per Alt. Method # 5822 Buildings 10 & 11 must be constructed with a sprinkler system capable of protecting a high hazard classification commodity stored in racks up to 20'. Per Alt. Method # 5842 Buildings 2, 4, 6, & 8 sprinklers systems may be supplied from the hydrant loop. FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement. The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a. Crosses a property line. • b. Is shared by multiple owners, and c. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please prowde a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fve District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal• a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 5 ~-,5 i ~~ 3 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Crosses a property line b. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation, and c. Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for revew and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the fallowing prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fue District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Diwsion and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (DomestidFire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fve Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fue flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements. All easements and agreements must be recorded with . the County of San Bernardino. 6 ~~~ ~~~ PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The budding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services: "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- sitefire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpmen is placed in service 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7. Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 9 The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraal/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will b regwred on bwldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial 7 GS~-~8' and industnal buildings. The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. . 11 Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in venting from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'fz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fue Inspector. r~ LJ G, ~ l~ l Planning Commission Meeting of ~~23 `~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NAME 2 3 a 5 6 7 a s 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ADDRESS CITY ~~ ~fl/A^ ) I~ ~T~u~ zzs'z/ q~on ~inH~ssA~i~2 Zfo(~ C~~~M1LctC~= ~Otu~ ~"~h3rZ~ ~~-~j/~P~w ~T ~ 3 5 3 I~ fZ~2c~ ~l nsln, c~ 1~ ~?. ~u~ ~~~ ~, ITEM ~1 U ~ r ~~~