Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/07/27 - Agenda Packet TAE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CUCAMONGA July 27, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California • • II I. CALL TO ORDER ~~ Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Macias Vice Chairman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart _ I~ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS ~I II III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES II June 8, 2005, Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop June 22, 2005, Planning Commission Minutes, Adjourned Meeting ~~ IV. CONSENT CALENDAR ~I The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, rt should be removed for discussion A DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME -The review of site plan and elevations for 64 single-family detached residences on 28 7 acres of land in recorded Tract 15982, m the Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue- APN 0225-071-69 Related File Tract 15982 This protect is based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) previously certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and the _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 27, 2005 RANOF30 CucnMONCn 2 Supplemental EIR (SEIR) previously certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2001 This protect is within the scope of these prior environmental documents and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Certified EIR and SEIR V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion o/ the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each protect Please sign in after speaking B VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -A request to allow a bulding height of 45 feet where a maximum bwlding height of 30 feet is allowed for the development of a 76,019 square foot worship center on 8 86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District ( 1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH - A request to reduce the regwred average landscape setback from 45 feet to 25 feet along Haven Avenue for parking stalls for the development of a 76,019 square foot worship center on 8 86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH - A request to allow retaining wall heights ranging from 4 feet to 16 feet for parking stalls and building pad elevation purposes where a maximum 4-foot retairnng wall height is permitted for the development of a 76,019 • • L J • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R~~NO July 27, 2005 CUCAMONGA '3 square foot worship center on 8 86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Development Review DRC2004-01019, Varance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16981 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A subdivision of 2 43 acres of land into four lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place -APN 1062-061-03 Related files Development Review DRC2004-01170 and Variance DRC2004-01169 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration F VARIANCE DRC2004-01169 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A request to reduce the lot width on four lots on 2 43 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place -APN 1062-061-03 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 and Development Review DRC2004-01170 G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH - A request to develop a new 200,000 square foot worship center including offices, meeting rooms, classrooms, and retail shops on 33 50 acres in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the north side of Ciwc Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue - APN 0208-354-01 and 04 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17009- WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request subdivide one common lot for residential condominwm purposes on 1 08 acre of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route -APN 0207-262-02 Related File Development Review DRC2003-01062 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration /r PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 27, 2005 Ijnxceo Cocnn+oNCn 4 VI. NEW BUSINESS I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -The design rewew of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 76,019 square foot worship center and 101 stall parking structure on 8 86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to develop 8 residential condomirnum units on 1 08 acre of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling unts per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue -APN 0207-262-02 Related File Tentative Tract 17009 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This rs the hme and place for the general public to address the commrssron Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS K ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS L DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS M TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning commrssron has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the commrssron C I • • C~ • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO .July 27~ 205 !u'UCAMONGA rj 1, Gatl Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 21, 2005, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~~~~-y If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission July 27, 2005 E,F * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • ~~. v° ~~ N City of Rancho Cucamonga T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO COCAMONGA Staff Report DATE July 27, 2005 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME -The review of site plan and elevations for 64 single-family detached residences on 28 7 acres of land in recorded Tract 15982, in the Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 0225-071-69 Related Flle Tract 15982 This protect is based on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) previously certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in 1991 and the Supplemental EIR (SEIR) previously certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 2001 This protect is within the scope of these prior environmental documents and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Certified EIR and SEIR PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 2 dwelling units per acre B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North -Edison Intermediate School, Single -Family (under construction) and water storage facility, Utility Corridor, and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant land and Single-Family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Vacant and Single-Family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Single-Family residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Desionations. Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Public Facilities-Park, Open Space Utility Corridor South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Public Facilities -Park and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00928 - KB HOMES July 27, 2005 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics The prolect site has a recorded final map (Tract 15982 house plotting was previously approved), has been graded and prepared for development The site is within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development The subject site is south of a Junior High school and bordered by Cucamonga Valley W ater Distract (CVW D) water tank, vacant land to the north, and single-family neighborhoods to the east, south, and west D BACKGROUND In June 1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the University/Crest Planned Development in the City's Etiwanda North area The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commeraal, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University portion of the development from the Crest portion. The University portion of the development has since become renamed Rancho Etiwanda The prolect was re-designated from Open Space to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) by the City Council on August 1, 2001 ANALYSIS A General/Product Design The proposed prolect consists of four floor plans that range in square footage from 3,290 square feet to 3,404 square feet Each plan has three different elevation styles All plans have variation in the footprints such as side entry garages or wrap-around porches and articulation in the wall planes, thereby avoiding "box on box" bwlding forms All plans have been designed with roof planes that have strong variation and are within the 30-foot high bwlding envelope regwrement All of the rears and sides have rich architecture elements that are reflective of the front elevations In a spent of cooperation to work with the Planning Commission's direction of providing single-story homes, the applicant decided to exceed the 10 percent minimum The applicant has provided asingle-story plan on 20 percent of the lots All the single-story plans are dispersed throughout the prolect and a single-story plan backs onto Day Creek Boulevard B Desion Review Committee The prolect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Coleman) on May 17, 2005 The applicant prepared revised plans in response to the Design Review comments The Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission based upon the applicant's enhancements to the houses The Committee's recommended conditions are contained in the attached Resolution of Approval C Grading Review Committee The Grading Review Committee reviewed the prolect on May 17, 2005 The Committee recommended approval of the prolect. The subject site has already been graded D Neighborhood Meetinos The developer has met with other neighbors in the area to discuss the prolect without any adverse objections from the neighbors E Environmental Assessment• In June 1991, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No 88082915) for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR On October 26, 1999, the County Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Clearinghouse ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00928 - KB HOMES July 27, 2005 . Page 3 the County Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the EIR (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which, among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the protect from the Crest portion The proposed protect falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a mafor revision to the previous EIR RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2004-00928 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DF/ge • Attachments• Exhibit Al - Location Map Exhibit A2 - Site UUhzatwn Map Exhibit B - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit C - Building Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plans Exhibit E - Conceptual Landscape Plans Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 17, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-00928 A3 VICINITY MAP NTS _ OJECT SITE r ~ '• ~, p=er (~ _- ~- -• - l ,-~-- - ,~yyll 1 D5 \ \ D6 L DD 7RAC Ab 1440E (SW LF CAMI RESIDE DD 00 ~~ o ~ EDLSON L ~ taw oearr ra~enu~ ur wing SCFi00L R.9JI, POH( WTERIM (` ~nurr wwoon BETENTbN BASW ~ nnxoo aicnuoxonzwauv - rtarenr a vmta ~ rrnm E,nrnron ~~ 2s I I ze `b 27_ I \ 2s I \ zs ~ ~ 1 7 E B 10 r;; _12-___J3-_ 14 15 - _.., ~ ~e. _ _ 22 ~ 23 ~~ 24 ~ 25 I 2E ~~ ~ PIiEPAIi®~, ICS HOME GfIEATf31 LOS ANOH.ES ~ .... INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION \~;+~ // ,'~~ %~ .~ _W ,,. I o"n~ ~ ~f • `- -~ 2 r~ #rt 7~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15982 8 15982-1 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 7J0 81.34 SITE UTILIZATION MAP as n.puan ssvrenmme xa Sheet 3 of 15 v ~ •i ~" TE 26 , / OL ~ / /~ 1~ U LoM oBB1Y R~BfINL (2 ~ p1~AC) P ~P~ UC / ~ - RpPHiIY B'MIIN TE IpRl11 EIM'RIOA 9£6C fI.AN I ~ ' f ~ CY;JlD WATER YREATMEN"f 1'ACILrYY .80 I k, i ~ ~- in i 2~ 23 0 1 ® 3;{ ~A2 i s 31 2 7 26 2 ii i ~ i m / e s~ m F - f i ` _ // W 15 v. - - - R -t~--, ~ ,g1 ~ ' // +~~3 4 ''~6 ~ 7 `~ 6 9 7p ~ uwi ~; ii a _ - +'i TRACT No 15J82-1 Trucr No 1s9ez I , --- - - - ~, ~ ~ \ 27 zd 29 ~ 26 TRACT N7 362\ 31 (5 MIL RESIDENYIAIO 2-1 25 ~ \ 21 ~ ?3 -~ 32 \ \ I TENTATIVE ~~~ ~~~ P~ TRACT NO. 15982 8 15982-1 KB FIOME C,tiEA7ER LO3 ANGELES ~ I RESIDENTIAL LOTS 7-JO 8 1-94 ---~. ~a ~. ~n INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION ~ ~~« ~ " "' "'« 1~ 1~ 1 SITE UTILIZATION MAP i ., ~., ~,. -,.m., --....,~..-. ........ ......... ...~.... w~-~.u O4 AN-tl SEFIFIIBE.B~ I ~a Sheet 4 of 15 - •---~ CVVVD IN ATcF2 TREAYMc`Nf FACII_IYY 24 lil -- F PH1C RNi( UC ~~^°°^ - QfY CF MN(]IO d1LAMON6~ Z«an YM - PIIOfBifY 6 NI1N TIE NORI11 EllNPIDR ~, KB HOME CfiEATER LO3 ANGLES INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION ~~ - i \\~~~ ~ .~ . ~ ~ UC SOUTHEF2N CALIFORNIA EDLSON CORRLOOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15982 8 15982-1 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 130 8 134 SITE UTILIZATION MAP Me Rqw~] SF-fEIOERY AY ~o~ Sheet 5 of 15 ,.~,A,.,_Y, wN ~" ~ ~y ~a n ~ tt~ ~~~ ~~§~~~ d pp ~ ~ g CF a~g W i ~~5 ~~e~e sib@:~ ~~ 3~ ~~ ~~ ~ p~~ 4~a g~~~s~ or ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ;` W _~~~ ~? g ~t ~Nm d~`o=r ~~' W Q~ F y~~~~ ~~ o O 6 y;~ !a W~ a 'a ~~~ Z J J 88 L t t~ rs -s ~~ H N `z w ~ ~ /C/E~O e o VI p b ~•E ~~ ' ~ ~c.-._ W g 4~ gv r S~ •y Qi u F N ` ~ d 3 e ' Y gg~ $~~~ '~i k&~@ ~9~~ ~- '~ ~~~4~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ :~e.55 ~a~ ~e ~ ~ b~~~~~~~~3 ~441I~pC((p C u, l ®' i ! ~ V ' bjj ~Y~1 o ~ o h ~ ~ Z~/~ _ J S ~ o / /~ /~ %/ j~ W %/ ~/ z o a N m ~'o w ~ = d RB ~W {~~ q p 6 ~ ~ Irif s ~ , ~ - i z ~~ ~Y ~~e°~~°~ ~tl ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~y z~ ¢ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~3ae3 ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ 6~ ~~ ~3 ~~ ~ p~E g~~ z: • W~~ ~Nb ~~e r~~ J W °~ d ~;w 0 ~ w m r Z V ~ s 5 ~ ~~ "1€ W ~ ~~~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ O g ~E; a ..~~~~~~~~~~~E 0 d~®~ 1~,~~IIP yyq y ~y EgxG B ~ p 4 yY ~6y Fy~~~F b ~ ~ f~ ~KaS ~ !~~• ~ ~ 6w'~ yg yy e ii S•S ¢ Sd6 6~g RY fb ~~ d Y qgAg 3~'~y~ ~~RF $i ~~ ~g ~ $~~ $i@ ~R7e~'k ;~~ N 5~~~: es 0 ~~ ~ Q~ W ~ O~' ~~ ~~ ~ ~ q g~~ W~a a ~' N z W o O ~ i ~ I `J ~~ x "x ~ ~° ~ ~~ ~m ~ ~ d ~ ~~ 0 o~ Nz ~~ y z n x 0 H >d~rz mm~x m u n U H ,Yj~~ w m r .. ~ In W O b .u 0 _ > r 0 0 ro r z =16s!E k If -1Cflt~Sf d~ :feEtagrf i ilF`.i iF`. ~ ii • • • "~ x ~x [ ~o ~ ~~ " ~' ~ d ~ ~~ 0 ~. N z n x 0 r~ rodbro~ mmm~ N W O U W N 0 b NU O 3i9itd ~ 3i >; -EdiE6 i ii d -Edf kd~ii ~ ane~~6 ~~ ~l~ - - - - - - -- ---- ~..~ ~ F+ WWW ax ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ d ~ "' ~. N z y z n W 0 y H >>~r z °ro°x m u n u a N W C U W ~ N 0 b WU O ~° m~ 0 xa r ~~ ~y~ro ~ ~' ~~ , ~~ Hm e ~o W ~~ 0 _ a ~~ [# ~ ~ ro -- g Q ~ 3p a t; r __ r~ ~ „ ~ _ _ ~~'~~ ~ i~ ~ -- -- 0 ~H r~ od m~ H 4 ~ro OOH G1 '~A~ ~0~ m~~ ~~ 0 ro ~H '~ M r~ <m ~r ~n m 3~ w 'a C d <' ~. o~ x 0 m rodroro mm~z m n H 0 w U Au x f"~ z y 0 z z n x 0 z V Nm z~ az z ti ,~ ~:t ~~ r~ f ~~ `a ~T f~l~ ~~~ ~ ~ W ITI ~ y r , ~r a 0 ° AE ` `t ~ $~ c ;~ g`+ . ~ t ~ m ~ b ' '~ c ~~ 0 N ~~ z ~ , r d r y ~ ~ < ~ D y H M y O , y 4 m ~~ M~ W 0 H ~~~~ z mnm n ~ b war :~ U W i N O '0 UU O ~ z ~~ x ~x ~ ~° ~~ ~m ~ ~~ d y ~~ 0 ~. ~z z x 0 N b d'tl'0 >yzr y ~ro°z /~ m u n u N w 0 U W i N O N qU O 0 x .~ d m .~ ~~a G~~ a C r r w N o~ x 0 m x 0 z z n x 0 ~droro >axr y nm~x L.1 m u ~ u N W 0 U W ~ N O b ~U O x d m m N hrMxrl h~+ WW ax W ~~ ~ r ~~ ~ /'~ d y ~~ 0 o~ N z y z x 0 r~ robrob Dais y mm~z [-~ n ~ b war ~~ U W N 0 b mu O x .~ d m m g~~ ~~ a a 0 0 a w a 0 a a w ~/ 6 ,. O hA T O N h m O ~ N ~ H U ~~JJ xw~w aa0a H N W 0 x v z ~~ z .o .~ o c~ A ~7 w ~i O~ ~ ~ ~H N ~F-,x~{i WW~ P~ W 7O ~ F~ H ~m z ~ nn d 41 C "' ~ o~ ~z z n x 0 H >°zr mm~z m u n u N W o U W i N ~O b OU O i P~~ m r m D z ~y r~ 0 ~a ror m z~ ..pie, _; ~;# 1~~ WW ~ W O 1 ~ N ~ ^ d y "' ~ 0~ N z z n x 0 r~ ~~~,,, >°zr mm~z m u n u N W O u '~ N ~O b ~U O m r z n r 0 0 b r z ~r ~' ~E t f f ~ IS{f Nt i L • ~~ N ~Fxi WWV ~ W ~~ y ~~ ~m ~ n d ~~ O ~. Nz Z n x 0 1~~ H >aar mm~z n ., Wo~ ~W N~ 0 ,~ vv~ b ~*~ 1~ I r roN rm a~ zz d ~~~ m r C °z a :.t --', ~L ff `J .R ,~~ ~} F~ A m ~j~ $ z se`o;~i 3,C„ c ~~ ~~ ` 8 i a8 f ~~~ • Ft ~~ ~.f t I 11 ~ WW ~ n d r1 C~ "' o~ Nz ~~ y z n x 0 H rodroro ~y mm~x y m u n u N~ ao U W N ~O b Wu O z c 0 C m x ~ro a o~ zr ro~ z~ ~i m m a ~'F i~! ~ C .~ 3~ ~~ y~ 0 ~ ~ ~o ~o ~a ----- -----m-- -= ~3 ~ '~ r_____ i O~ 'zg ~~ f- 1~~ i 5 L ~~ z ___ > a --- ~ I L.il ---- --- o ~j s c~ oT m m a e 99991 S ~ to;aa ~Pia~aa 's<taE as 4 f~63t 9~ ------- 1~ Z~< m A~'a ' ._-.' o h~ as ~, ~~ ~~ ~~~ U W ~j H w '~1 aaQa (H F'1 0 U z ~~ a 0 O ~ Q z .~ .., o N ~ .~ A 0 b x ~ ~~ ~a~ N a~ aQ a~ Ow Oa aw wE d w Qo a~ aQ a, W sew N Q h hN P 0 M „ n h i b ~ F U ~..{ z~~w aa0a r LH L W 0 x U z ~~ z .~ .~ o N ~ ' ~ A z~ w~ NL '" C~ OO M ~ ~N ~a~ ~~ ~~ ax ~ ~ ~ ~m d "' ~~ z z n x y~ 1 E"~ >°yzr ~yy °ro°z 4 n W A ,W U W i W O b WU U YD ~~ m z~ ~~ x ~rorm, xm~ 0 ~o~ xoz W~m ~rom xm< any 0 x°oz W~ro ~rom xm< ~d~ 0 xoz W~~ A F~+ ro ~ ~ .; ~'~ o- E~ O O H pp// 3F :1 ~~ F ~ _ Zl~ ~ aC oa a ~ 13z - p m i i ~ i r a z¢ a~ z a~ w h ha rn o n ~ n h b m A U Ww ((('''777---111 F a0.QW F"~ W 0 x v z H z ,o .., o N ~ A w~ ~' o ~ x~ x ~~ • 4 ~~ r z w a w h ~h ~o ~„ r ~, ~~ U ~~~jjj z ~ ~ w wwQa r LNL C~ W 0 x U z H z .~ .~ o N ~ .~ c~ A ~ w~ ~' o ~ m~ W N • ~a8 ~~~ M Fxi ~O/ 1 Ga r+ r m H L~{1 ~~. 0 o~ z z n H >dzr y rom~x /~ m u ~ u W N u U W ~ W O b mu u x d a m d m a 4 z 0 F w w x • ~3~ h nr P O M h m h i b M U wW aa0a r [[H~ C-' W 0 x U z z .o .., o N ~ A .~ .~ w~ ~ o~ x~ x ~~ /~~ c d ~~ ~. o~ x x~ ~a m '~ 0 z z n x 0 r~ rodroro >>~rz mm~z ~ u n u W A i U U W i W Q b 00 U U r m d i i ~ ~ W G. '~ ~~ y r r+ ~ n ~~ 0 o~ ~z ~~ z n x 0 a>~rz n.~oa mmMx n a u a '^ uW .W a~ e~ m r z ~~~ ~~~ • N Mxi I~MNV ~0 y ~~ ~~ ~ ~ d ~ ~~ 0 o~ Nz z n W N m~~x m u n u W A ~ U U W i W ~O b OU U x m m r m ~, m m i~,~ • • • ~ ~ W a 'y~ ~ r~ ~m d "' ~. Nz z n x 0 r~ H mdroro r mm~z y n ~ ~V}~7 w a r U 41 i W 0 `D rU U m r a z m ~U ~~~ • ~ ~ W ~~ H ~~ r m r+ ~ ^ d r1 ~~ "' 0 o~ z z n x 0 r~ N >d~r nm~z n W A i U U W i W ~O b NU U r m m d m m r m y z m i a w a 0 N w w • • /~3~ c 99 9 911199 i P E4~iicct9 11 ES~l4cci9 q P E$~!5l cue ~ ~~~ ~ i! 61~~Ea ~- O o a M ~ o ~) N O V~ 1 U ~~~......~~~ zw~W aaQw r H W 0 x U z 7~ J F~-1 ~11oy'! .~ o ~ A ~ w~ ~ o~ xb x ~~ G~f~ "~ x ~x a ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ d y ~~ 0 o~ z y z n x 0 N ~~, ydzr mr~i~Z m u n u O N W UO U W A O O N~ A m A 0 3 m ~, '" o SO .~ i`r; C 0 ~~ __ ~A aa o •i y ~ ~~ o; x~ °om ~A ~o- W ~ tJa ~~ ` a ~ j w' a __, -- i °z~ '>~°o~ 3 ~ FQ a 0 _s ~~ 4 ~ W Q~1 M y l~q ~ Iil~ (^{f ~.~C z w w~ OQ o0 oa Jm 0 0 m s 0 m m~ °1 °o ~o fm W C C s- a ~w ., QO wF ~4 ~, __ a 0 ~> k'E wo a 2~ m F ~ F z O a O 8 0 m hm 0~ Q~ ~F F~ a 0 0 a aN~ S o< O Q~~ ~m ~~o m F3~ f 's~ o d x a~ ]a ~W ~~ a~ j Q F O MMM W N C ~ i S a / ~I F ~ W If; ~~7 R w ~- --- ~, H 0 0 ad 0 a hn 0 0 a h m h n N ~ F U W~ F WWQO l W rIUWO !~ U z z .~ .~ N r n~ `urh1 M (^' .ti O M~ 11 I"1 N X38 b~~ • "~ x ax w~ y ~m ~ ~ d y ~~ 0 o~ z ~~ z n x 0 r~ `~, >dzr y mm~z /~ n ti~ W ~ ~ O U W A O O Au A ~r ~m a~ ro ~~ .~ h ~,~ s, r : . u N, u Ox Fz >~ w a w ,.4~~,- ~ _~.:z__ s ~~~~ .: z- ~-~ =. ~~ ~.tr 9 }~ _ ~y UM ~ vh y*4 2 t i «. n~ 0 0 a h n o ~ N 0 A U z z`~~w Aw ~1 ` aa ~~ H L C~ W O U z N z o , N o .., A ~ z ~ H w ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ m N W ~~~ N MrMxri WW A~ W a~ ~~ y ~m d ~ c' ~ ~~ 0 ~. N z y z n x 0 aa~r ~~]~ mm~z `~ m u n u i N W O U W A 0 O AU A ~~v • ~~ U ~~ W ax ~~ ~ .. ~m z d~ ~. ~ ~~ o ~. z y z x 0 r~ ~~~~,,, aa~r n.~oa nmmx n N W C U W i A O 0 JU A x d m n ~~ H a r C ~. o~ 7~ a m a>~r mn~z m n W 0 ~u W 0 z '~ H Y z n x 0 z ~~ W ax ~~ ~ r m r ~ nn d 41 ~~ ~ "' o~ z~ ~ y z x 0 l" y H >a~r y mm~x ~, 1 a o U W A O O bu A fiU m r m a 0 z ~o s= n "~ ro o ~ ~~, br ~ m zy 3~ o ~ ~ ~ o a a ~~ ~x ~~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ^ d y "' ~ o~ z y z x 0 y\~']~ '1 H yazr y orooz /~ m u n u O N w 0 r U W OU A m r c a z ao -- o ~O i ~i b 44~# ~ ~ a °or ,~, a ro" o= Y ~ ~~ z~ a `. J ^ ^ e " z wa ° W aa a ~~ • 4a w ~ 1 w~a! ~ s Z ~ zo - - - - A~ w a w w a h~ 0 0~ v h M o n n N o h U ~j xwHw ~I aaAa ~~ fL~ l w U ~~~ z ~~ z .~ .~ o c~ A ~ w~ H o~ x~ x ~~, • • • ~~~ N 00 ~~ 0 ow w 8 0 w w a E~ q~f xoQim om ~o U 0 a w w Q oz oQ W~ ~0. QD w~ Qw a o hN 0 0~ a h m N 0 F U z z~~u ;~ awaa H W O U z z .o .., 0 N r~ ~ V A W~ ~ Q~ ~ ~ W ~N ~77 W cw !a a nm O O~ a h m o " ~ m N O V G~ H ~WQW W O U z ~~ z .o .~ o ~ A ~, w~ ~" o ~ x~ x ~~ i ~~~ 6~~ a C d c' ~. ~. 0 x 0 m ad~r mm~'DZ m n W U 0 ~u x H Gl 0 z z n x 0 z V s A d m ~~a °s~ ~~a o°~ ~d mp mo Fp a ~~ m s 0 w m '_+- ~..~___ ~~ aj ~ j - ~ ° ~~ ~~ z a a 0 W z 0 U W h hN U O h h n p b m N U zW~G wwow H ~~ w U z l' ~ ~ z .o 0 ~~ H t7 A .~ w~ ~ o~ m~ W N ~~~ ~~a ~~ a b ~. m a~ y z n 0 H bdroro mm~z m u n u N W PO u w ~ u O b wu u o '~ ~' y m H 0 z ~~ 0 ab ~y ~~ ~~ =A ~ ~ z m'' as/~ l l ~ A MM ~ l`I H ~~ ~~ m ~v .aiz x ~o ~~ o~~ ~xo OAS ~ rn H ~~ t~ 0~ ,~ 0 A Mz l y ~o ~~ xm wd y0 00 z~ ~"~ y r~ C~ ro ~D n m r 3Z M ~~~ a~ ~ N ~m ~• O N~ ~ y z n x MO 1~`], '1 H ~azr mm~x n ~ N W 0 U W u 0 `0 Au U l a~ zy ~ '~ 0 zz a ~~~ ;~°~ Rt r ' '. `. „ties •r Fti ~0 ~. ~r_ tv .; .~ ~; ~~~ 4 :'-n` -T c• I I I ~§ ~~ r ~~b N F11 WWrYI G W a F+ C w N ~. z MO l1J H >dzr mm~x n N W O u W U O b uu u 0 ~ '~ m G1 0 z ,~~ ~: ~,.,. , . Y~~ ~~s , 4 yE A ~ :f ~ 1 t. ; .-.,~i ~r ~< a ro rt "~ ~,~ .. ~ :r .._ C.I C~ "~ x ~x z ~o ~ ~~ ~m ~ d ~ ~~ y ~~ 0 ~. z y z x 0 y >>~rz rom°z n N W P. i O ~' W p. U U 0 x ~i m d ~~~ H G. d C ~• m ~. 0 7~7 r~ 9 d'V'U yypr mm~Z m W u JU 0 z H z n x 0 r~ H z V x y d m G1 H ,~ ~ ~ ~0 y ~~ ~~ d ~ c' '~ ~. 0 o~ N z y z x 0 H bdroro >>~~z mm~z m u n u N W Q~ ~ 0 u mu u '" w x .~ d m n ~~ i i i e~ rl~nrEO wR ~arEn Dr i K8 HOh¢ GREATER LOS AtJC~LE3 INLAND EMPIRE DIVISION • ~~ ~.~. LEGEND ".~" ~- w.~.~ u °.°"° vc-.~~wn TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15982 8 15982-1 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1.70 6 1-34 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ownw.a uN,~srn xow Sheet 9 of 15 pn.MV.Nxwi N+~wuunnm i~\~~n 4~M W ~ ~ ~N = k'~ g ~ ~,_ b ~~ n 6 ~ 05~ ' V' 30~~ ~ ~ = r ~ f ~~ f O ds i ~ a < ~~ tea= ~ w 0 ~ W ~ ~ O ' O ~ F F ~gsga iq ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ iIq 4~~;] 1 3~~~$~fl$~~a 0 I I 9I®I 11?:i~ I I i li11i pW~ a 5r z o a fN ~o w~ o- ° i w ~I o ~ ~ ~_~ ~ ~~ c, t~s ~-:s W~~ .~ N _~~ g~~$ ~ wMw b F w M ~ G ygy~~ Oaf ~ Y Tr ~ a lpw r~~ o~ F W ~ a ~ FN = a ~ o ~ W C V ~ ~ = O O ~ Z ` r ~ ` r 44l~~Q 9 d k M f~ s a ~~~~ ~~~i ~~a 4~d;~ g~ ~559~~~~5~g~1~~ s~4~~6493€~(!~~ ;I®~'~"IIIB lil~~ ' ~ . y a z} o a (N gs J ~ w a a "Y w ~S 06 ~a f ~ ~- i W~~ N ~~ f '~ ~ J J ~ ~N S W W W C O F F Q: ~H(( .J G Oei N~~ O A 3 a mob= ~~ ~ $± 6 ~~a $ 9 4 a F3~ €E~p ~~~ ~~~~ 4~J.. .- ~g~~~~~~t~~ ~~~iE~e~~~~ ®I 11 `,°~I~A owl 3 m } z o a 8"4 J ~ ~~ 9, w a t1p z A ~ ~-I WrX F~° Q ~ b ~~o W~~ ~N~ W W C r O Z F F s ~ _~~~ s ~ OF~ __ M~ j r ye ~ m~~ ~ $ N~ s c~ ~ ;, ~ ~ e ~, 6 ~~Y ~ ~i a ~~~~ §g ~~~t~ ~ ~~~ a~~~~~~€i~~~~ ~~®~i~,,~ill~ S z . o~ g"( J ~ w ; ¢ _ a a' w ~6 of ~E ~ I Z4 133HS 33S I'~ ~_ ~~° om' ~°~' ~ a@ ; _ Q ~_6 ~ ~ ~• r p mI_ ~ a m°~ ~ N ~ rzi W ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ r 0 ' Z F V F ~~~ 4 ~`pg~ $~~B !~ e +Iq 4~d,] 6 ~~~ s~~~~~EEEE~~~~ ~I®I1i~t}}}~ ;; ~;,!! . ~~ - ~. _~ o. 8~~ J ~ w a ~ ~~ Q o p{ µ8 ~ 0 6 ~ ~ 1 ~__ • • ~m:~~- - - .. I ~"g'~ '.s~- :~ ~ .f t -~ ~ - SECTNNI'A-'A BECIION T!' TY SECTIOII'C-C SECTION TY-V 9EOfM)N £-£ •@:~3~. N f -I ,. ' 8ECTN)N F-F BECTMNI'6Ti' BECTNNI H-H SECTION T-T SECf10NJ T ~1~.~~- BECTION'M-1(' PIEfAfEp FOR KB FiOAIE (ifiEATSi L03 AN(~E3 - INLAND EMPIRE DMSIDN~- PFEPAIED en -~~-~i BECl10N L-i' TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15982 8 15982-1 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 7-30 8 7-]4 ~~.e~. SECTIONS osnv.a Niaarn ao~ Sheet 15 of 15 M,.-..~~.. N» ~ :r 4~~ R B ~ ce ;3 ~ g~ y~e I g ~~ _ 3~i ~~~d i ~~~ ~A $6666 g ~ BSS ~~~i a ~~s ' 5 4 ~~~ ~.9 g& ~.~ E ~~ ~ i~ ~~~I~#~ ~~i~j~ ~fi~€4! €i ~ 0000000 ~ 1 3 ! ~ t=i, ~~98 ~ ~ i~~~~~s a~sl~}€ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ooooo00 ~-(~4~g ~~ ~ ~c~~ $ s a ~~ ~~ ' ~l~l i ~9~4 !~~ i ~~~l~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~at~ ~ ~ a ~o o ~~ ~ 1 3 , i ~ `'- ,i~ ~ I ~ °` ~ r ~ y jy F r ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ` E ~p ~ m q ~ a ~e W v V 6 , ~~ O 9 v' ~ 7i i ~ i z v~~ ~_ U Y , ' [ i ~ ~ fl~~i ,° ~ } , w 0 5 f ~ ,,,,, >>> f DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.50 p m Doug Fenn May 17, 2005 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME -The review of site plan and elevations for 64 single-family detached residences on 28 7 acres of land in recorded Tract 15982, in the Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acres), located at the northeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 0225-071-69 Related File Tract 15982 Desion Parameters/Update The project site has a recorded final map (Tract 15982 house plotting was previously approved), has been graded and prepared for development The site is within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development The subtect site is south of a Jurnor High School and bordered by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract (CVWD) water tank and vacant land to the north and single-family neighborhoods to the east, south, and west The proposed protect consists of four floor plans that range in square footage from 3,290 square feet to 3,404 square feet Each plan has three different elevation styles All plans have vanation in the footpnnts such as side entry garages or wrap-around porches, and articulation in the wall planes, thereby avoiding "box on box" bwlding forms. All plans have been designed with roof planes that have strong vanation, and are within the 30-foot high bwlding envelope regwrement All of the rears and sides have nch architecture elements that are reflective of the front elevations In a spirit of cooperation to work with the Planning Commission's direction of providing single-story homes, the applicant decided to exceed the 10 percent mirnmum The applicant has provided asingle-story plan that is 20 percent of the house product The developer has meet with other neighbors in the area to discuss the protect without any adverse obtections from the neighbors Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Architecture Style The site is within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood theme area of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan The Plan regwres at least 2/3 of the tract be more than one of the following pnmary architectural styles. Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan A maximum of 1/3 of the tract may be any of these secondary architectural styles Country, Victonan, or Santa Barbara Revival The applicant should rewse elevations to label which architectural styles are being proposed, and provde a summary table of unit mix Staff believes the styles are as follows Fl Pl Architectural Style oor an Primary Secondary 260 3290 A San Juan 260 3290 B Bungalow 260 3290E Ranch E,~'l li~1a- r~ R~~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME May 17, 2005 Page 2 Fl Pl Architectural Style oor an Primary Secondary 165 3395 A San Juan 165 3395 B Ranch 165 3395E Country 250 3404 B Bungalow 250 3404 C Ranch 250 3404E Country 260 3595 A San Juan 260.3595 B Bungalow 260.3595 C Ranch 2 The Development Code regwres 360-degree architectural treatment to all elevations with a speafic architectural style Although the proposed architectural styles are attractive, the elevations should be enhanced with additional details consistent with the extensive design guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Staff recommends enhancements, such as a Plan 260 3290 A -Provide 4.12 roof pitch Provide entry courtyard with walls b Plan 260 3290 B -Replace stucco with horizontal siding and/or shingles on all sides c Plan 165 3395 A -Provide entry courtyard with walls d Plan 250 3404 B -Replace stucco with horizontal siding and/or shingles on all sides e Plan 260 3595 B -Replace stucco with horizontal siding andlor shingles on all sides f All Plans -Garage door pattern should not be same on all Provide variety g All Plans -Chimney designs and materials should not be generic They should reflect the architectural style of home consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Also, some floor plans show fireplaces that do not appear on the elevations, such as Plan 165 3395 Plans should be revised for consistency Secondary Issues Because Lots 20 and 30 are comer parcels, around porch be located on these comer lots Design Review Committee it is recommended that a house with a wrap This is consistent with past direction by the 2 The protect site is located in the urban/wildland interface, which is a high fire hazard area, therefore, regwre speaal construction techniques, such as "boxed in" eaves The designer should work with the Fire District to identify how these standards may affect proposed architecture u ~~ W DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME May 17, 2005 Page 3 Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 All mtenor pnvate yard slopes are regwred to be landscaped with ground cover, shrubs, and one tree per 150 square feet of area 2 River rock shall be real, or native fieldstone may be used Stone veneers are not permitted 3 Provide decorative pavement on dnveways Decorative dnveways shall have vanation throughout the subdivision 4 Access gates to rear yards should be constructed of a material more durable than wood Acceptable matenals include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 5 Taper three- orfour-car dnveways down to standard two-car width at the street Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and return as a consent calendar item to the Design Review Committee Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Doug Fenn The Committee recommended approval of the revised plans and colors presented by the applicant ~~~ • RESOLUTION NO OS-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 64 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCES ON 28 7 ACRES OF LAND IN RECORDED TRACT 15982, IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0225-071-69 A Recitals 1 KB Home filed an application forthe issuance of Development Revew DRC2004-00928, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On July 27, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on July 27, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The project has a density of 2 22 dwelling units per acre, which is within the penrotted density range of the Low Residential Distnct, and b The protect falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, which induded a conceptual layout fora 64-lot, single-family development at this location, and c The protect meets or exceeds all applicable technical regwrements and the design gwdelines of Development Agreement No CO 00-088 and the Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located ~~D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-59 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME July 27, 2005 • Page 2 b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially m~unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development in July 1991 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is regwred for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bernardino certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Unversity/Crest Planned Development In August 2000, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues assoaated with the adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would regwre a mator revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and concludes as follows a There have not been substantial changes in the protect that require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase m the seventy of the previously identified significant effects, and b There have not been substantial changes with respect to the arcumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which will regwre mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects, and c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exerase of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the following 1) the protect wdl have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined wdl be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altematve 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth . below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~W I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-59 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME . July 27, 2005 Page 3 Planning Department 1) Where the slope conditions require retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, provide a logical transition to allow access onto the slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc The final design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, pnor to issuance of grading permits 2) Prowde a 3-foot minimum landscape area between the back of the sidewalk and the block walls on all comer lots 3) A 2-foot wide bench shall be provided at all perimeter walls 4) The side yard retaining wall heights shall be a maximum of 4 feet 5) All return, interior side, and rear walls shall be of block material 6) The Developer shall provide a written notice, in the form of a disclosure, to each prospective buyer of the Fourth Street Rock Crushing Faality located northwest of the protect site The disclosure shall inform the homebuyer of the use of Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard as a truck route to and from the rock crushing facility and the occurrence of truck traffic noise 7) The developer shall provde each prospective buyer of comer lots written notice of maintaining the landscaped parkway The written notice shall be signed by the prospective buyer pnor to acceptance of rash deposit on the property 8) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real, or native fieldstone Other forms of stone may be manufactured products 9) Decorative pavement shall be provided on the driveways Decorative driveways shall have variation throughout the subdiwsion Engineenno Department 1) Applicable conditions of Tentative Tract 15982 shall apply a) New interim basin for Tract 15982-1 shall be subtect to the same easement and maintenance agreement regwrements as basins originally proposed b) Include the private cross-lot drainage facility at the toe of the 2 1 slope on Lots 5-10 of Tract 15982-1 on the grease grading plan Prowde adebris-resistant inlet to the public storm drain that is also accessible to City maintenance crews ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-59 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME July 27, 2005 Page 4 c) Penmeter walls adjacent to Day Creek Intermediate School, the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct facilities, and Lot A of Tract 15982 shall be watertight d) Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain, measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk Restnchon applies to Lots 6 and C of Tract 15982-1 2) If Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct decides not to install a recharge basin on their property, the developer shall design a permanent faality to be maintained by the City, prowde an easement, or acgwre the property for said facility and deed it to the City 3) Fenang for lots that back onto the existing channel and basin southeast of this tract shall extend down the 2 1 slope to the penmeter fence Wall and/or fencing plans shall show how individual property owners will access these pnvate slopes and the cross-lot drainage faality for maintenance purposes • 4) Landscape Maintenance Distnct (LMD) Plans (Drawing 1988-L) shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of Building Permits Note that the following standard condition includes the • 180-day establishment penod for LMD improvements a) Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no energy connections shall be made unless all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval have been completed and accepted by the City Councl Exception in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of these buildings or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by the conditions of approval In no case shall more than 95 percent of the bwldings or units be connected to energy pnor to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval 5) Revise existing public improvement plans as needed pnor to Building Perrrnt issuance for applicable map phases a) Drawing 1988 shall reflect approved dnve approach and street tree locations b) Drawing 1988-D shall show the debns-resistant inlet to the public storm drain for the pnvate cross-lot drainage faality on Lots 5-10 of Tract 15982-1 c) Drawing 1988-D shall reflect elimination of the intenm basin with Tract 15982 and, if applicable, the addition of a pennanentfaality on the former Cucamonnga Valley Water District property ~/~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-59 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME July 27, 2005 Page 5 d) Drawing 1488-D shall address reconstruction of the northeast end of the existing trapezoidal channel to accommodate the connection of the service/fire access roads Relocate fencing and gates as needed e) Drawing 1435-D shall reflect the addition of fencng to prevent pedestnan access to the trapezoidal channel from Lot C and the existing paseo at the west end of Las Bnsas Court in Tract 13527 6) Prowde a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 7) Pnor to the issuance of Bwiding Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineenng Department when the first Bwlding Permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engmeenng Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect Environmental Mitioation 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerlythe University/Crest Planned Development), as covered by the EIR and Supplemental EIR (SEIR) certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors m June 1991 and October 1999, respectively, and Initial Study/ Addendum, prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m August 2000 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-59 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928 - KB HOME July 27, 2005 Page 6 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thatthe foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ ~ 73 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00928 SUBJECT: 65 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: KB HOME LOCATION: EAST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND NORTH OF W ILSON AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its -1~- agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to rel~ngwsh such approval The appiicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No OS-59, Standard ~_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire if bwiding permits are not issued or approved _/~_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fde in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~_/_ • of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-05 ~ ~ 7`f Prgect No DRC2004-00928 Comolenon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, vngation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of buldng permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for indmdual units with ail receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- famdy residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 10 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 11 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 12 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought von and PVC. 13. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 14 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two'/z-inch lag bolts, to wdhstand high words Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 15 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including av conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as requved by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans SC-1-05 {~ ~] h 2 I' I/ -/-/- ~_/- ~~- ~-/- _/_J_ _/~_ ~~- _/~- ~~_ _l-/- _/-J ~~- -/-/- ~~- • Protect No DRC2004-00928 Completion Date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Cary Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shaft be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be regwred per the Development Code This regwrement shalt be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Cary Planner in the SC-1-OS ~~/„ 3 ~V -~-~- ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~~ / / ~~ ~~- _/ /_ _/~_ Protect No DRC2004-00928 Completion Date amount of $474 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~~- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~~- a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (i e , DRC2004-00928) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report -/-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to -/~- the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls ~~- K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be ~-/- marked with the project file number (i e , DRC2004-00928) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant -/_/ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to ~ City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and SC-1-05 n 4 n Protect No DRC2004-00928 Completion Date Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bullding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays L. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wend" instructions M. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with Callfomia Building Code, Clty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfomia to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bullding and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal Is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where Improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fell The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Clwl Engineer N. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-Inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be Installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 Inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices O. Windows Ail sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner P. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility 5~-,-US ~ 78 5 -~-~- / / ~~- ~~- _/-1 _/~. ~-~_ _~~ ~~- _/_J. _/~_ ~~_ -/_J- / / _/~- Project No DRC2004-00928 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED sal-os /17~ s r' RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS March 3, 2005 Tract 15982 & 15982-1 SFR High Hazard NEC Day Creek & Wilson DRC2004-00928 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelmes for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a For single-family residential projects m the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u. At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any budding c. If any portion of a facility or budding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or budding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1 The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in X80 accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 • 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire Distract review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 2 Fire service plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 3. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600- feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in. . 1 Buildings constructed in the designed Hazardous Fire Areas which include a All structures in lots 1-34 must be spnnklered in accordance with NFPA 13-D per Alternate Method #5896 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access 1 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design regwrements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and speafications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire Distract Knox Key Switch c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adtacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fads to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex • 2 ~Sl e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall . automatically reset 2. Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternatroe Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area Submit plans in accordance to the following Standard Fuel Modification Plans Fuel Modification Plans Submit four (4) sets of plans• (1) RCFPD, (1) Job Set; (1) Architectural Plans; (1) Recorded set Approved plan and documentation must be recorded with San Bernardino County pnor to release of occupancy Proof of the recording must be provided to FCS. Submittal Requirements: 1 Site plan (bluepnnt size) providing details of the zone areas (i.e ,Zone "A" -set back 0' - 30', Zone "B" - irngation 30' - 80', etc ) Text Document (8-1/2" x 11") to include details of how the fuel modification requirements will be met This text document will also include the following: Successor clause -statement indicating that any subsequent homeowner must comply with the conditions of the fuel modification plan. Substitution clause -statement to read• "Substitution or replacement of approved plants, with plants from the approved list, may occur without a resubmission, if the plants are similar and meet the same cnteraa " c Statement indicating that any mafor change to the plans (i.e., substitution of more than 50% of the approved plants, theme change and/or method change) will regwre a new submittal to the Fire Distract for review and approval d Any reference to an approved gwdeline (i e , LA County, SB County Overlay Distracts FR-1, FR-2 or FS-3, Orange County) regwres those portions of the gwdelines referenced to be included in your document e Minimum 100' of fuel modification distance is regwred and shall include off-site property within the 100 feet distance The off-site portion of the plan will be considered "thinning/modification" A letter from the adjacent property owner must be included in the document OR a notarized letter providing a detailed "diligent" effort to contact the adjacent property owner 3 Aga Mitigations to the fuel modification plan include a Installation of automatic fire sprinklers, or • b. Installation of block walls; or c. Use of rated construction materials At the discretion of the Fire District, fuel modification plans may be regwred to validate the design assumptions by providing acomputer-generator model (BEHAVE) of the plan NOTE: Fuel Modification Plans must be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval prior to the submittal of architectural drawings In-fill single-family dwelling projects located in the Hazardous Fire Area A simplified landscapmg/fuel modification plan may be acceptable The plan shall detail the defensible space Provide a minimum 100-feet defensible space for slopes less than 15% and a larger defensible space may be regwred for slopes of 15% or more The proposed and/or existing vegetation must be shown. FR-1 construction regwrements must be met The architect must implement FR-1 Area construction regwrements into the design of the home. 2 Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, egwpped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks c Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day d For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a mimmum distance of 10-feet. A °hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one froe (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extingwsher fully egwpped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements 1 Prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced in wildfire • hazard mitigation planning 4 ~S3 2 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have submitted and obtain approval of a final fuel modification plan Further, the budder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area Approval is subiect to an on-site inspection 3. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan regwrements shall be installed, inspected and accepted by the Fire Distract staff Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire Distract "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 rewew fee. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred poor to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 2 All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 4 Fuel Modification Plans Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area regwrements 5 Construction Access• The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 5 ~8'~ Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE REiEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' °Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers• All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow evadable. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the Cahforma Fire Code 3. Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Servces. 5. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 7 Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements 8 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the 6 ~~~ Risk Management Pian (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 9 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact inforrnation for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 10 Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all dewces and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 11. Secondary fire access roadways must be inspected and accepted by FCS in accordance to Alternate Method #05896 (PMT2005-00318). 7 1~Q1,. • T H E C I T ANCfIO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE July 27, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan Coleman, Pnnclpal Planner BY• Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 76,019 square foot worship center and 101 stall parking structure on 8 86 acres of land In the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files• Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -A request to allow a building height of 45 feet where a maximum building height of 30 feet is allowed for the development of a 76,019 square foot worship center on 8 86 acres of land In the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01. Related files Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Development Review DRC2004-01019, Varance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH - A request to reduce the required average landscape setback from 45 feet to 25 feet along Haven Avenue for parking stalls for the development of a 76,019 square foot . worship center on 8 86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Review Items B,C,D & 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 2 DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Development Review DRC2004-01019, Vanance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH - A request to allow retaining wall heights ranging from 4 feet to 16 feet for parking stalls and building pad elevation purposes where a maximum 4-foot retaining wall height is permitted for the development of a 76,019 square foot worship center on 8 86 acres of land m the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street - APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Revew DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Vanance DRC2005-00322, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Desionations. Project Site -Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) C Site Charactenstics The 8 86-acre site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street The protect site is currently developed with a 7,700 square foot multi-purpose building (Family Center), modular Sunday school classrooms, Actroity Pavilion, baseball fields, and 241 paved parking stalls The surrounding land uses consist of single-family residences The street improvements have been completed along the entire protect frontage along Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street, including a Community Trail along Haven Avenue I~ u $,~,~~Ta PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01 01 9 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 3 D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces T e of Use Foota a Ratio Re wired Provided On-site Churches 13,125 1/35 sq ft of 375 a) Paved stalls 291 sanctuary b) Structure 101 seatm area c Ball field arkrn 155 Totals: 375 547 ANALYSIS. A. Background On August 11, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the proposed sanctuary At the workshop, the Commission indicated support of the architectural concept The Commission also directed the applicant to provde additional parking above the regwred minimum in order to minimize the impacts of the protect on the neighborhood The Commission emphasized the need to provide architectural rendenngs to the neighborhood and obtain input from the surrounding residents. The Commission was undecided whether or not a Variance for a reduction in the landscape setback off Haven Avenue was fustified • B General The church site was ongmally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29, with the exception of the archtectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with a Master Plan and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Conditional Use Permit 88-10 was also included in the master plan for the church In 1994, the church completed its first permanent bwlding, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose bwlding presently being used for worship services The proposed sanctuary is in substantial compliance with the approved master plan (Conditional Use Permit 88-10) The proposed 1,400 seat sanctuary is actually smaller that the 1,500 seat sanctuary that was ongmally approved The current proposal, as all previously approved proposals, includes the use of the lower (south) ball field for parking This ball field was constructed and compacted to accommodate vehicles The applicant is proposing to construct a 77,500 square foot worship center, which includes administratroe offices, classrooms, and a sanctuary. The two portable bwldings that function as Sunday school classrooms will be removed with the construction of the new sanctuary The worship floor area of the sanctuary is 13,125 square feet Also proposed is a bi-level parking structure that wdl provide 101 parking stalls The parking structure has been designed to maximize the use of the grades on the site with the first level being underground and built into an existing slope The second level will take access from the north parking lot. The parking structure has been designed to blend with the proposed sanctuary and existing Family Center buildings, utilizing a river rock base on the south and west elevations The landscape slopes buttressed by a keystone retaining wall B, C , D, T 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 • Page 4 surround the three exposed sides (west, south, and east elevations) of the parking structure. C Vanances• The applicant has applied for three Vanances for to allow for departures from the literal requirements of the Development Code The first Variance is a request to allow a maximum budding height of 45 feet, where 30 feet is permitted A second Vanance is a request to reduce the requued average landscape setback along Haven Avenue from 45 feet to 25 feet The third Vanance is a request to allow retaining wall heights ranging from 4 feet to 16, where a maximum 4-foot retaining wall height is permitted The Planning Commission has the authority to approve the Vanances in order to depart from the literal requirements of the Development Code only when special circumstances applicable to the property would create undue hardships Variances may only be granted when the strict enforcement of the Development Code would result in a practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to grant a request for a Vanance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property Specific findings for each of the three requested Variances are found in each of the respective Draft Resolutions of Approval. The following is a summary of findings for each Vanance: Vanance for Bwldino Height. The sanctuary bwlding has a pad elevation that ranges from 6 to 30 feet below the street grades of Haven Avenue and 30 feet below the street grade of Vista Grove Street Because of the existing topography of the site, the proposed bwlding heights will only project 15 feet above the street grade on Vista Grove and range from 15 to 39 feet above the street grade on Haven Avenue, depending on the reference point selected The sanctuary has been designed with generous setbacks of 115 feet from the nearest curb face of Vista Grove Street, and 118 feet from the nearest curb face on Haven Avenue With the gable roof design of the sanctuary, the deep setbacks, and the depressed pad elevation, the casual impact of the bwlding height wdl be minimal on the surrounding community. Vanance for Landscape Setback From the intersection of Vista Grove Street, the street grades along Haven Avenue range from 1 5 feet to 14 feet above the parking lot elevation Because of the difference in grades, mature dense landscaping, and the remaining average landscape depth of 25 feet, the parking lot wdl neither be visible from Haven Avenue nor detract from the Haven Avenue streetscape. Further, the reduction in the landscape setback will provide an additional 24 parking spaces, thereby promoting the public welfare by providing additional on-site parking stalls and reducing the likelihood of street parking Vanance for Retaining Walls• The property is located within the Hdiside Overlay Distract that limits retaining wall heights to 3-4 feet. Retaining walls are proposed that range in height from 4 to 16 feet. The retaining walls are necessary to reduce the visual impact of the proposed buildings, because of the bi-level parking structure and the parking stalls "~ , C , D, T `-f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 5 adfacent to the landscape slope along Haven Avenue The retaining walls are necessary for the 13 feet of cut that will be regwred to depress the pad elevation of the sanctuary in order to minimize the impact of the building height on the residents located on the north side of Vista Grove. The retaining walls along the landscape slope are needed for the parking stalls behind the landscape area along the Haven Avenue frontage The parking stalls will not be visible from Haven Avenue because of the fall of the street and the existing mature landscape area The bi-level parking structure has been designed so that the lower deck is built into an existing slope, thereby making maximum use of existing grades and allowing the first level to be virtually subterranean. The retaining walls are needed because of the existing topography of the site and to achieve sought after design goals of the Hillside Overlay District that will ultimately minimize the impact of the sanctuary and parking structure on the surrounding neighborhood D Design Review Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, and Coleman) reviewed the protect on May 31, 2005. The Committee recommended approval, subfect to the climbing Boston Ivy being planted at the base of the concrete columns in the landscape slopes along the west, south, and east elevations of the parking structure The applicant agreed to the condition of approval, which has been included in the attached Resolution of Approval. E. Grading Committee The protect was reviewed by the Grading Committee on May 31, 2005 The Committee recommended approval, subfect to a condition regwnng that the maximum discharge for the existing channel at southwest corner of site shall not exceed 13 7 CFS, and a final drainage study shall be submitted during plan determining the grease pipe size necessary for retention purposes The Committee's condition has been included in the attached Resolution of Approval F Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on May 31, 2005, and recommended approval subfect to the Standard conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. G Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant The City's Environmental Consultant completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. The protect will include the construction of a two-level parking structure and the expansion of an existing grade level parking lot The church borders asingle-family neighborhood on its west and south property lines A photometric study was completed to ensure that the upper level of the parking structure and the expansion of the existing parking lot would not cause glare on the single-family dwelling units located to the west and south of the church property The parking structure is located 60 feet east of the west property line that separates the church and single-family residences The parking structure will generate 0 foot candle illumination at the shared property line, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles The expansion of the grade level parking lot at the south property line will result in a maximum of 20-foot candle illumination on the residential properties south of the parking lot, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles The 20-foot $,C, D, 1 5 FANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT :C2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH .y 27, 2005 - age 6 candle tllummation will occur 10 feet south of the shared property line A 10-foot wide landscape planter is located on the church property at the south property Ime, and upon maturity of trees, the .20-foot candle illumination will be reduced even further An arbonst surveyed the physiological and structural condition of the all trees affected by the proposed sanctuary The proposed sanctuary wdl affect 138 trees that qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Ordinance. Of the 138 existing trees affected by the proposed sanctuary, 16 trees will be relocated, and 122 trees are proposed for removal. The applicant is proposing to install 95 trees, which wdl be comprised of three speces (London Plane, Strawberry, and Sweetgum). All species wdl be a 24-inch box size and will complement the existing plant palette The entire 8.8-acre protect site requires a total of 255 trees, based upon the Development Code ratios for parking stalls and (meal feet of bwldmg wall plane The entire protect site wdl have a total of 308 trees (197 existing, 95 new trees, and 16 relocated), which is a surplus of 53 trees Since the protect site wdl exceed the regwred tree ratios, the proposed removal of 122 trees is consistent with the original master plan with regard to the bwldmg footprint locations, landscape, and tree ratios With the new tree plantings and tree relocations, the impact is anticipated to be less-than-significant. The Environmental Consultant concluded that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust Mitigation measures wdl be regwred to reduce impacts to short-term air quality. The mitigation measures wdl reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be m order. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A total of four neighborhood meetings were held (January 5, 2005, January 24, 2005, February 1, 2005, and April 14, 2005) Approximately 25 to 30 residents attended each meeting Residents had questions about providing adequate off street parking, the proposed height of the sanctuary, noise from church activities, and drainage After each meeting, the protect architect made modifications to the protect design in order to completely eliminate the impact or to mitigate the impact as much as possible within the design constraints Below is a summary of each issue raised by the surrounding residents and the applicant's response Adequate On-site Parking Several residents who reside on Viwenda Street, Ozark Mountain Place, and Stone Mountain Place expressed concern over the historical practice of church attendees parking on the local residential streets and on Haven Avenue because of the lack of on-site parking Residents indicated that if on-street parking is presently necessary as a result of 300-400 attendees per Sunday Service, then the construction of a sanctuary with a capaaty of 1,400 would only worsen the amount of on-street parking in the residential neighborhoods PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 7 Response The proposed sanctuary has a worship floor area of 13,125 square feet and has the capacity to seat 1,400 The Development Code has two parking ratios for churches. one stall per 35 square feet of seating area within the main auditorium, or one stall per 4 fixed seats The proposed sanctuary has been designed without fixed seats; hence the one stall per 35 square feet of area parking formula was utilized to calculate the required amount of parking. The sanctuary well regwre a total of 375 parking stalls at one stall per 35 square feet of area. The church presently has 251 paved stalls on the property. The proposed sanctuary and site design Includes the Installation of 40 additional paved stalls, a 101 stall bI-level parking structure, and 155 stalls on the lower ball field The ball field parking arrangement was approved with the original Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29 The pro)ect will have a total of 547 on-site parking stalls, thereby exceeding the required number of parking stalls for churches as required by the Development Code (392 paved stalls plus 155 ball field stalls) The parking requirements are Illustrated below In Table 1 below. Hillside New Sanctuary Parking redo and required number Location and number of stalls of stalls 13,125 square feet Parking ratio 1 per 35 square feet On-site Parking vrorship area Required parking 375 a) Peved stalls 291 b) Structure 101 c) Ball field parking 155 1,400 seats' Perking ratio 1 per 4 fixed seats' Total paved on-site stalls Regwred parking 350 (a + b)~92 Total on-site stalls (a + b + c) =547 Offsite Perking d) Chaffey College Lot 400+ Parking Totals Grand Total (on-site +Chaffey) 947 Table 1 'Hillside Communay Church Sanctuary does not have fixed seats The 1 per 4 fixed seats calculation a provided for reference only Dunng the neighborhood meetings, several residents noted that Hlllslde Community Church, with Its present 7,770 square foot worship center, has attendees parking on the local neighborhood streets every Sunday Residents expressed concern that If the present parking lots were Inadequate, then the construction of a new sanctuary would only Intensify the weekly occurrence of attendees parking on the local neighborhood streets In response to the residents concerns, planning staff and WLC, the protect architects for Hlllslde Community Church, conducted parking count surveys of cars parked on Sunday mornings Planning staff and WLC architects found that at peak hour (second service on Sunday morning, February 6, 2005) the existing lot at Hlllslde was full (241 . stalls), 113 cars were parked on the nearby streets, and 58 cars were parked at the off-site lot leased by the church at Chaffey College The total number of vehicles for attendees at Hillside for a Sunday morning was 422 [~jtC,9,T '7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 . Page 8 In response to the parking surveys, Hillside Community Church augmented its existing off-site parking lot and shuttle service at Chaffey College. Hillside Community Church presently operates four shuttle buses, each with a capacty of 36 persons. If user demand warrants, the church will purchase and operate a fifth shuttle bus Each shuttle bus makes aone-way trip from the churc' '~~ the parking area at Chaffey College every 8-10 minutes The buses operate every Sunday f .rn 7:45 a.m to 12.30 p m The Hillside Community Church has secured a 5-year lease (with option for 5 year renewal) with Chaffey College for parking at Parking Area 18 at Chaffey College Parking Area 18 has the capacity for 400 plus vehicles With the 547 stalls at Hillside Community Church, the total available parking stalls (on-site and off-site) are 947 (Table 1) Planning staff researched what present vehicle occupancy rates are for parishioners who live in and attend church in communities that are very automobile-oriented The research indicates an average vehicle occupancy rate of 2.0 to 2 5 persons. Using the most intensive vehicle occupancy rate of 2.0, the proposed 1,400-person sanctuary would necessitate 700 stalls With 947 total available stalls (547 on-site and 400 at Chaffey College), this allows for a vehicle occupancy rate of 1 5, and equates to a parking ratio of 1 stall per 14 square feet of worship area, more than double the Development Code regwrement and more intensroe than the most restrictive murncipalities surveyed (Table 2) Ingress and egress to the auxiliary parking lot at Chaffey College will be from Haven Avenue, thereby avoiding the pollution and noise impacts of shuttle buses to residents that live off of Wilson Avenue . Since the neighborhood meetings, Hillside Community Church has strengthened its parking ministry team that provides attendants at local streets and informs attendees to utilize either the on-site parking lot or the off-site lot at Chaffey College. Parking lot attendants morntor the available parking stalls and direct traffic accordingly. Over the past 4 months, Hillside Community Church has had a target of zero cars parked on the local streets and has been able to consistently meet that goal Residents also expressed concerned over the feasibility of the ball field parking When the original Conditional Use Permit was approved (Conditional Use Permit 82-29), approval included the parking of automobiles on the ball fields, provided the ball fields were compacted. Hillside Commurnty Church had RMA Group (Geotechnical Engineers) review the original soils compaction reports by Geosoils The compaction report indicates that the soils were compacted to 90 percent of their maximum dry density The evaluation by RMA Group of the compaction report indicates that the ball fields on the lower pad areas will be able to bear the weight of the vehicles The evaluation by RMA Group further states that vehicles could leave ruts if the ground is saturated, but that the ruts could be corrected by recompaction The Hillside parking ministry team will identify drive aisles on the ball field with orange cones, and parking stalls are delineated by flags mounted on poles that are inserted into the turf Planning staff has conducted surveys of other municipalities parking ratios for churches The findings of the surveys indicate that in most cases the City of Rancho Cucamonga's parking regwrements for churches are similar In a few municipalities, parking regwrements for churches are more intensive than the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Parking regwrements for churches for other municipalities are summarized in Table 2 • j~,C,D,1g PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 9 City Parking Ratio Notes Rancho Cucamonga 1/35 sq ft or 1 per 4 fixed seats Chino 1175 sq ft or 1 per 3 fixed seats Chino Hills 1/25 sq ft or 1 per 3 fixed seats Fullerton 1/21 sq ft or 1 per 3 fixed seats 1,2 Pomona 1/35 sq ft or 1 per 3 fixed seats 1,2 Riverside 1/30 sq ft or 1 per 4 fixed seats 1,2 Table 2 1 Cdy has at least one mega church PJthough no precise definition of a mega church could be located, most sources place a congregational regwrement of at least 2,000 people 2 CNes surveyed that have ewshng mega churches apply the same parking mLOS indicated above Proposed Bwlding Heloht Residents who reside north of Vista Grove Street Indicated concern over the initial proposed height of the sanctuary (52 feet) After several Ilne-of-sight studies by the protect architect, the design of the sanctuary was modified to lessen the visual Impact of the building Response The protect architect has lowered the original proposed pad elevation from 2,002 feet above sea level to 1,994 feet above sea level (8 feet lower) and dropped the original proposed height of the sanctuary from 52 feet above ground level (AGL) to 45 feet AGL By lowering the pad elevation 8 feet and dropping the height of the building 7 feet, the net Impact is that the highest point of the roofllne Is 15 feet lower than originally proposed. The height limit In the Very Low Residential Distract is 30 feet, accordingly, the applicant has flied an application for a Variance to allow a building height of 45 feet The bullding has been designed to dig into the existing grades on the protect site, thus minimizing the view Impacts on surrounding residents The sanctuary bullding pad elevation well require approximately 13 feet of excavation below the present grade The bullding pad elevation of the sanctuary ranges from 6 to 30 feet below the street grades of Haven Avenue, and 30 feet below the street of Vista Grove Street. The greatest view Impact on the residences on the north side of Vista Grove Street well be the visible upper 15 feet of the proposed sanctuary, as measured from the street grade on Vista Grove Street By comparison, a standard 2-story house would be visible approximately 25-30 feet above the street Most residents will have little or no Impact on their views to the south because of the depressed pad elevation of the sanctuary and the gable design of the dominant roof element, which Is commonly found In residential districts having a modest roof pitch of 4 12. Noise from Actroities Residents stated that some of the church outdoor activities, which are conducted on the lower ball fields, generate excessive noise late In the evenings and early mornings on the weekends and throughout the day on Saturdays Residents cited excessive noise from the crowds cheering during various sporting events • ~3,c,~,zq PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 10 Response A 6-foot high wall is proposed along the south property line in order to mitigate existing sound levels and prevent headlight glare from the ball field parking An acoustical consultant concluded that a 6-foot high masonry wall would provide 10-decibel reduction for residents whose rear yards share the south boundary of the Hillside Community Church. Subjectively, a 10-deabel reduction equates to a 50 percent reduction in loudness at the resident's homes A 6-foot wall will not provide any sound attenuation at the second story windows for the houses at the south property line The Hillside Community Church is proposing to utilize single-level bleachers, thereby reducing the height potential of spectators, and ultimately the sound levels The Hillside Community Church plans on maintaining its present level of sports activity, and does not plan on augmenting its present level of ball field sports as a result of the proposed sanctuary. Adequate Drainage • During the neighborhood meetings, residents on Vivienda Street raised concerns that the existing 1-foot wide by 1.5-foot deep drainage culvert near the southwestern corner of the property is inadequate to handle the present and future runoff generated by the proposed sanctuary, parking structure, and new grade level parking stalls. The resident's ated repeated historical observations of the water breaking out of the culvert and draining across private yards Response In to response to these concerns, the protect civil engineer reviewed the original drainage report for the master plan and performed a drainage analysis. The project engineer concluded that with on-site 48-inch to 60-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipes (RCP) functioning as retention basins, the present drainage channels and culverts are adequate to handle the site tributary area of 6 4 acres. The 48-inch to 60-inch diameter RCP will ensure that flows to the culvert are not increased beyond capacity The Hillside Community Church has modified its present landscape and maintenance program to include regular cleaning of the culvert to ensure adequate drainage Further, a final drainage study will be regwred to be submitted during plan check to the Building and Safety plan check engineer to determine the ultimate pipe size necessary for retention purposes CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site During the neighborhood meetings, Planning staff was able to obtain the a-mad addresses of residents who requested to be notified of the Public Hearing date Planning Staff a-marled all residents of the July 27, 2005, Public Hearing date on June 13, 2005. At the time of the writing of this report, staff had received one a-mad from a resident on Vmenda Street expressing concern over the summer outdoor activities planned at Hillside Community Church Staff was able to answer some the resident's questions and also indicated that specific impacts on the surrounding residents from the church actmties are appropriate to be raised at the Public Heanng • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 11 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Vanance DRC2005-00323 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions DC.DG/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Demo Plan Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Grading Plan Exhibit E - Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Floor Plan Roof Plan Exhibit H - Parking Structure Plan Exhibit I - Sanctuary Building Elevations Exhibit J - Parking Structure Elevations Exhibit K - Site Sections Exhibit L - Wall Sections Exhibit M - Mechanical Egwpment Screen Wall Elevations Exhibit N - Applicant Neighborhood Report Summary, Dated Apnl 7, 2005 Exhibit O- Applicant Letter for Parking Management Operations, Dated Apnl 29, 2005 Exhibit P - Chaffey College Site Plan and Offsite Parking Lot Exhibit O - Letter from RMA Group, Geotechnical Consultants, Dated March 25, 2005 Exhibit R - Letter from McKay, Conant Brook, Acoustical Consultants, Dated February 16, 2005 Exhibit S - Design Revew Comments and Actton Agenda Dated May 31,2005 Exhibit T - Conditional Use Permit 88-10 Master Plan Site Pian Exhibit U - Applicant Letter of Justification for Variance DRC2005-00321 Exhibit V - Applicant Letter of Justification for Variance DRC2005-00322 Exhibit W - Applicant Letter of Justification for Vanance DRC2005-00323 Exhibit X - Initial Studies I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-01019 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2005-00321 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2005-00322 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2005-00323 ~C~~,Z11 Dan Coleman Pnnapal Planner 9 ~~a#~ „ I L$ U a o 8 S~v O C ~ rs°d C7 ~ ~ ~ ~ mFf 1 k 0 -....I 0 F J W5 /N't\ \J ~CX`~-sg~- ~ U~t sl ~ ~g /~~ ~ ~ ~ p_p~€ t 3~~:ii y~ U m E ~ f.~ 9~ a 3 I Lscti B' o . a ~~a o ~ ~a 9U~ S C i S ~~G o a d~ a o daf &~ 6 y ~ ~ ' ( ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ i°g61I~ ~ ° g ~ £ i''~ :e~ I,l~I o w ~~R~~~ 1 ~ e ~ O islifli,! {~~il 6~~~~~ nnnnnoooo o a ® ' ' .~ F--Xt}~g~T $ U ~ ~ ~ m~ ~~ ° ~b !~~ o 8 3b{~~~l ~~ TU H E~ ~~~ ~ i a ~ ~~ ~ . 3 ~`a~d rY I r ${5 d o y a i~ ~f ~~ . 9 8A dd 4 3E[ 3 ~ ~ 9 ~ 9b¢ ~ c ~ pE o ~ ~ ~~ t 3! ~g B e d @ w ~ ~ ~S R C ~~ ~ c ~ z ~ ~:F 'qBg ~~~ " ~ aye ~ ~ ~ Y p ~ ~ e 5 ~ Si~E i m gg E ~E !~ i~ 4F ~ p ~~ @9 ~~ Rd@ ~~~ ~~~~ i E ~ ~ gg p ~ii @ ~a D D IL IL ~~~ rr ~.,gsb~~~ 9 ~ ~ ©00 '~ - - I. ~ ~ -~ ~~ ~I u l l 11 l i. I I I I I I. ! E ~ ~ ~ ~ :i i ~ ! ! ,~ _ z.~ \ "" ,_ F;t ~ ~9f~ ~ III :.. .: ~~ ~ < ~~~ ~~I ! `y: ~ ~~ ~ ~ tl I ~ ~ I~ _ f .~ ~ ~ , / 1 ~ ~ a~ ~ ~_ / ~~ I~ C ~. k ~ a ~ ~ A y~ ~' _ ~ _ t ~ ~ $ ~~~~ ~ .~ Y ~ ~ ~l~ale I I r' p l 1 ~ 5 ~ ~ is eee EI2~~ p ° pei 10}iE iEi[@ 1 1 '^ ~~j~z.~,~~ G m ter---r- ~ ~~:'' «~~ , " ~ w 'a i :, ~ o p --,~~p~ ~ e . 4 ~. aldrn ~~~< 9 a e ~,~ ~ s 9 4~ +~9 ~ ~. 4 q'n; d ~' I .,d.....,_,rn ,. , e --- ' t ~\ E ~ ~-°e e 4 ~s6 9 -~----- E' R S § ~ ;~ i i 9i Q i m i m u=.r--T ~ ~~ i ~ }-~~~ s ~ - ,~ i~ ~ i a e ~~ '~ /~/ 9 01 e 1 6i \-_ ~ W I ~~ ~~ N ~~ ~ ~'~~L ~ i t" ; r~ s q i E ia@ f 7~ a 1~ ~~ it ~~ a s ". I u ~ f,~~~ 0 c ~ °° o U ~~ ~1~ ~ ~ ~ a 1 < - o ~', U tw \~~ _ N~ ~ \\\ N A / I ~ s .~. m.,~ 9 ~ e ~ ~ a ~~hh ~ 6 _,..~~ i! ~ ~ V i _ a ~_ E ~ 3~ ~ a=~ ~ - R3 y~ E' <~ U ~ 11 ,.-,v,--d-~ --~~, ~ '-~' o ~c'~'s~~ ~ 111 j ~q ' ~ '~ 0 ~ N ~'l _.-_--_ ~ rl l .~ x m w \r -~ o ~ g cv !Y1\~Sr x ~ ~Es ~ ~ „~_II \ d ~ ' ~`-- 3 ~u~ fa FE ° a / ~f i5t ~ ~ III FZi ~°u;n id ~ ~I i W ¢ ¢ ¢ I „_ ~ _ Y i E I ss E~s ~i 3 \ ~ ~ ~-- __ 1 5p 1 ' __ ______ ! , ~ [F L _, 1 IL \\ ~ S [ %\ I 5 \ II ~ ' \1 ®®! \1 I P \, I I ~ u fl ~I - \I I W ~ M l ~ 0 V I ~ E ~ --~ ~ U do i ~ I A ~'~ ~! !~ ~~ ~ ~ ud ~i~. ~,t °~L----°~-__ 3 ~ ` ~ --il QI ~ si ~ ~~i___s_______ U a ~~i i ~ ---nE=-------f6Q---------a-------s-~~-~ b ~ :,; ~, •~ p s! 7 \s ~'l !i 1"I V I ~i B 1\I\ ~ s4 s :~f= C ~~~ DLO G ~( p ~+~- ~ 'i s:475 L~1~~\7Y \ ~~, I 1 ! ~ ~ J e m W ~~~ boo B =' E 'i EH y g `{` 1 ° ~y ~ ~ ! d y E U] B 6 ap tai PIE! $ ~ IEP o i S ~ P~ 19 ~ i ' ~• p i 9 y 3 tl 9 z E~ I ~ 3 ~ P 1 ~ 1 ~ i E' `• ~1 ~I '[4 ~i N rl P~ E"'I gal ZB P ~ 9: ~ 4 I O ~°~ ~" E ~ 53 E E. ~~" O Py --"rt ~ .-~=~= - ~ ariu®ny ~ ' 8~ '' ~~~ uensy~ ~ V ~, gg3 ..'.~ ~..e - _ *-T - - c ~~ - ---- x/-77 - -- ~~-~~ t~~-"..~_...- i~l rw'~1 I { , ,~ I; Per ~~j~' '' 11J~:~-ll1 ~~.1J~11~ !~ ~ , ~' /a~ ~ n .~ ~ _, ~ ~~ U~ I ~~I I L ~ ~Y~a i~ W mn ,~i. f ~~~ ~c Y i ; I $ I _ ~d,~ ti g~ '"~ ~ ~ ,~, ,,a~~ ~ ~ ~ = ~dddi i I Y ~ j d~ r~ IgF a t ~ . •, ~1.~ L $ 11 t ~~ `t ~ o-„~ I~~ ~ i II€,~~ ~ ter, 3i~ ,e,''~ ,~r" ~•o a,~ o o~ i..:m,w4 E 4g -~ . ~~ E~ g {~ I~ -ter w ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~ fi ` ` f ~3~ ~~. c ~ I. ~ ~~ ~ ~ gg ~; .~ b ~~• __' i i ,,~ I -1 ~ IPS ~ I g„ ,~~~ -~_/ ~ ~ pp~ ~~ ~~ , i i tl °~" Js : ;t 9 y ' ~; A: 4 ~ a i ~ i', ~ ~~I,~' m~~, ~-i!s ~~ ~~ z ~ ~~~~ j~ ~ it ~tE~l~ ~~ I ~~-'~ s; ~ ~ ~~ °~ ~ w ~ ~1 11 ~ro~ ~ ~ ,'~ °- ¢ ~ ~, ~, ,F ~• i ~ I ~ Id IPA _ ~~ ___ _.~.. _ __ _ ~?~ J0}gym `__~_c_ _< <_____-~.J-- a°' ~ ~y~ 'j Itg~ ~ Z _ , . Q ~q#~ ii ~~ ~ w ~ ~~ ~~_~~~_~ ~ ~~~ ~~ o ® 7iE~ fs ~ Na g~ It~~a°~o ~ ~ p ~~~ ggz €~ ~~c~~T ~ iE ~ 1 ~~'p ~~ ~ 1~~ I~~~ ~~~ ° °;~~I~ ~ ;~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 9. ~~$~~l~i @~s ~~~91 si d i9 ~~ m 0 ©®® o o® ; e 9 !6 ~ ~~ i it°I ~ 3 li ~ ~~ ~~~e ~ ~ ~ B Ejl~ ~1 ig~4 iS g @ , ~4a k° E IP[i ~1 I~ ~I~~~ ~ y ~ 9 il~~ 'ji ~`i6 ~~il~ !! li :11111 e!!ii 91~~~ !!~ ~~e~~ 9E ~ s o • e • • • ~ °O ~° ~~ a ! ~ j I i i °i 1 1 1 i t ~[ ~ 1. gggg Y g gg ' pf ~p~l 911 ~! !pit ~ 51~ 3 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ; 'p1 ~ ~1 ~S cfe pp[#~ ) i i i i ~8i9ig~ P~IF ~~j~C~>1 I~oO+e ®® 1~ ~ QQ /U, ~ `'~ y~yS€ ygo 1 g ~!;#~ !, I L g o a o Sp O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~ pi yy g v ~af n ~~ ` ~ ,,, I .. I I I N ~~ ~~ ~, =~ ~ .~ z~~ i~~ ~ ~~ ~:.~~ - - ~ ~ ~ ;\ a ~ ~ ~~ % t - ~ ,,~_ ; y / ~ 3 ® r i ~'`' aqs / ~~ ° ~p ,,~~, i ~/i;~ ~` ~ /~ ~ ~ \ / .I ~ .+~~ ~ ~i ,~~~ ~ A ~ i Y rat ~~~ -~:..__~V~ r d ~~ k ~~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ®~ J ~ / ~G `k i ~ ~ S$ ~_~ - ~I _ _ _-_-_ I ®~ ~ .t OdBO® ii t=- v ~ s G gs~ S! 1~ o ----- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 ~ ! ~! .! g! t~~~g gg ! .Ii ~'~ gyp! I g~ IS ~ y~~plt{iye ~! S ~, eg j9 g St~ -w{ I ~ ~1 ~1 ~1 I11:i 66NQ 0 ~ Sg li v ~!4 3 _ J S ~ Q 11 ' lifS l~~~g ppels 3 ,/ - e V l S~5:Li 9SE ~~~'+s8z~- ~ ~ 1~ ~ ... .. . Vl ! ~'l ~ gi ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ s ~~;#j YY I L $ U a '~ . 9 F ~ I i I ~ I ~, ,' ~ JLJ ~ S iii;' : i® s ~' ~~~ ~ z ~~ \° o ~ ~ ~ ,_, r-- ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ j ~~ Fr-- - - ~ ~ ~p~~ o ~ y ~ ~ \ / ~ ~\ ~ / it ~- ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ } / \ ., ~ \%~ ~\ 6l , Y~~ } ~r '~ ~ r / ® \ e', ~\ <~ ~r~ ~\•-~ ~ ~: A ~~ `~~I t ~ - - - - ~3 I --- ~ ~ , - -- fi -----o i ~ 0 ye tl I f S; !E ! ~ ~° ~! ! ~ 'silt ~ 7 ~:~ i i~'a Fe 0 p t 1. . J I ~ ~; i. ; ~~ :i ~o~ ~ ~.~ .qs yip 1 i i .3 ese 3 j°~ ]a ~~ ~'~'°ii~~illl C~ ~ a ~ N ~Iy:E:aEe + N 8[ ~ ~ ~' ~g~ c; y~ t ~~ y~p N LL a B 9 ~dE $ ~c y €€i F...1 ! 39~~~ E~ V y E~ ~~9 1~ ~ ~ ~~a~~ ti I t g c~ R 99 ~~ ~~b rca C7 c A ~~ b F ~ oaa~ av da~ .~ ~I r /~R i.. iy~iy ~~y~3~3 a~ V ~, e ~ ~~~ 3~~a~d 11 I L8~ ~~ o ~~ !~6 ~~~ 4 ~a € d ' ~ ay ~~ 44 P ~d~ e J 4 I I I I I I I I i a rc b ~ ~ ~ o ~ I I I I I I I I I 1 ~~ P,,c,D,Taa 0 z_ 6 w 6~ h O- 0--- o-- O- ~- _~ • I I I I I I I I I O wS I I I I I I I ~ I I ygyg N a U N~ ~ i3 S ~ a b ~ ~ 00 ~ ea~t~~Q U yE~ ~~d ~ @ ~ w~ ~ !' ~~~;#~yY I t$u a ~ ~ d4 ~~l~w ~~ .Bc a ~~ ~I 7 SO ++ WEST ~~VLC H CC hillside cammunily church nncmw,n,a f it I 9 i I'~ ~ i ~~ ~ ^ ~~ `` ~~ y ~71~~=C' 0 W WN C O g~ 0 ~~ Q E i' ~ ZZ N a~ 5 C ~ y~ NmN ~~ <Id dY 3 E! 0 N f 1l1 F ~~ Z O r U w N Y of U N F N F ~~ r~ ~+R-f WALL SECTION WALL SECTION QD WLC H CC hlllslde community church ou mwa+o+c i WALL SECTION OA WALL SECTION n WALL SECTION n V ~ g~g,~lt~ egg ~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ e 33~"- 4E V w E ~ ~:~ ~.~~~',f~ti, I L8~ a' o 9 e ~~ I`s~ ~N ~a ~ ~ W ~~ 444 ~3~ wo ~.l~z-BZ.T U N Z 7 m W qOq Z~ U e e i 3 8 z e O y Y W k J W .~ F N J OS ~~ n ~ ' I ~,k e ~~ ~~ f § z o ~J a w >F O W o ~i J 2 Cf W W N O ~= ~~ w! w' S3~'f- ~ ~ ~ f W L C Arc h Itectsl loin WoRI, AIA • George M Wien; AIA • Robert 1 Hensley AIA • James P D~Camilb, AU • Glenn Ueda, PIA Mox Mednro, AU • Kelley IJeedhom, AIA • Krrrn A MocOuome, P1A Apn17, 2005 Report Summary Neighborhood Meeting Process Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expansion - DRC2004-01019 WLC Project No 03-12500 03 Introduction The project consists of a New Mtmstry Center to be constructed on an approximate ten (10) acre existing campus for Hillside Community Church, located at 5354 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, 91737. The Project will include a major expansion and new buildtng addition to the existing Faintly Center consisting of approximately 77,500 squaze feet, a 101 space two-level pazktng deck, selected intenor renovation of the existing Faintly Center, removal of two extsttng modulaz buildings together consisting of 11,500 squaze feet, new pazktng areas, and site improvements to consist of paving, utility infrastructure, and landscaping. Residents and property owners within a 600 foot radms of the project, along with representatives from the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, were invited to a total of four Neighborhood Meetings. The purpose ofthese meetings were to provide an informative presentation of the proposed New Ministry Expansion for Hillside Commumty Church, to communicate the nature of development proposed, and to understand potential community concerns. The following project mfoimation was established for public reference and consideration. Develovment Review DRC2004-01019 -Hillside Community Church: The review of the bwldmg design and detailed plans for the development of a 1,400 person Worship Center located on 10.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (1 to .2 drawing amts per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven and Vista Grove Street - AP.1074-271-O1. Related files: Pre-application review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, CUP 96-03, CUP 88-38, CUP 88-10, and CUP 82-29. On September 28, 1988 a negative declazation was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit 88-10 The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or negative declazahon is regwred for subsequent protects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous negative declaration. Yrginio Dore Tower.10470 Foothill Boulevard. Rancho Cucamonga,Califomia 91730 3754. ph 909 987 0909 fax 909 980 9980 1110 Iron Point Rood • Suite 200 • Folsom, Coldomia 95630 8301 • ph 916 355 9922 fax 916 355 9950 1250 4th Street .Suite 150 • Emaryalle, Caldornia 94608 - 2901 . ph 510 450 1999 faz 510 450 2525 Notification Method The methods used to involve the neighbonng community pnmanly included wntten invitations sent to property owners hvmg within 600 feet of the project boundanes Four Neighborhood Meetings were conducted for the protect. The first, second, and fourth meetings were held at Hillside Community Church, and the [lord meeting was conducted at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall as follows. First Neighborhood Meeting Second Neighborhood Meeting Third Neighborhood Meeting Fourth Neighborhood Meeting Hillside Community Church Hillside Coinmunrty Church Rancho Cucamonga City Hall Hillside Community Church January 5, 2005 January 24, 2005 Febmazy 1, 2005 Apnl 14, 2005 Copies of Notices of Invitation with mailing dates, mailing hst, and a cumulative sign-in sheet of meeting attendees aze included with this report. Summary of Questions and Concerns The first neighborhood meeting produced a vanety of concerns about parking, traffic, penods and types ofoperation, Horse, and building height Even with some of these concerns still evident dunng the second meeting, the Church was able to begin a process to move foiwazd and achieve significant improvement to the design. With the City's cooperation, a third meeting was conducted at City Hall with Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at 5:00 PM on Tuesday, February 1, 2005. This session with Traffic Engineenng produced methods for both residents and the Church to improve safety at street comers and street intersections, and for tmproved traffic management at Haven Avenue Dunng these meetings, the following key concems and issues were raised. 1. Quantity of On-Site Parking Required and Provided 2. Feasibility of Field Parking 3. Street Parking, Traffic and Access 4. Chaffey College Shuttle Parking 5. Church Operations and Programs 6. View Impacts 7. Southwest Drainage Capacity 8. Lighting Overflow on Adjacent Property Hillside Community Church New Mm~stry Expansion page 2 Report Summary - Neighborhood Meeting Process Response to Questions and Concerns 1. Quantity of On-Site Parking Required and Provided Concern Insufficient on-site pazkmg is proposed. Response The proposed design more than doubles available on-site pazkmg Currently, there aze 241 on-site pazktng spaces For the proposed New Ministry Expanston, an additiona150 paved surface pazkmg spaces,155 field pazktng spaces, and lOlpazking deck spaces aze proposed, resulting in a total of 547 spaces - an increase of 227%. Approval of the onginal master plan for the Church was based upon a 1,500 sf worship facility requtnng 240 paved parking spaces and 135 field parking spaces for a total pazkmg capacity of 375 pazkmg spaces The City's required pazkmg standazd is based upon 1 space for every 35 squaze feet ofmain assembly for azea The current design reflects a 1,400 sf worship facility with 547 on-site pazktng spaces, which exceeds City pazkmg standazds by 172 spaces or 146%. As a result of and dtinng the Neighborhood Meeting process, proposed on-site pazkmg was increased from 447 spaces to 547 spaces. Proposed On-Site Parking Tabulation 1 Paved Surface Parking 291 spaces 2 Field Pazking 155 spaces 3 Parking Deck 101 spaces Totals 547 spaces 2 Feasibility of Field Parking Concern The use of field pazktng is unrealisric. Response: Field pazktng is currently being used successfully at the upper northeast sports field of the site Dunng the City approval of the baseball fields in 1995, the fields were approved for use as a pazktng lot for 125 cazs, and to provide a portion of the required pazkmg for a new future sanctuary (CUP 88-10) The fields were graded and constructed to 95% compaction of sub-grade matenals dunng construction to specifically support normal automobile traffic The Soils Engineer for the project, RMA & Associates, concurs with the required compacrion regwrements necessary to support normal vehicle traffic, and believes use of the field areas will satisfy weekly Church pazktng needs. A statement from RMA is included within the Hdls~de Community Church New M~mstry Expanswn page 3 Report Summary -Neighborhood Meeting Process ]3,e,D,z3o . Appendix of this report The Church has not been able to pazk on the baseball fields due to restricted access caused by the existing south modulaz buildings and adjacent outdoor pavilion and snack baz, and because of limited emergency access. In the past and particularly for the past several months of this rainy season, field pazking has been employed on the upper northeast field to demonstrate the realistic use of field pazking, and to resolve concerns about traversing wet grass and pazking during inclement weather. 3. Street Parking, Traffic and Access Concern Street pazking by Church attendees creates unsafe conditions Response. Neighborhood concerns regarding vehicle pazking at street intersection comers, crowded narrow residential streets, crossing of pedestrian traffic at Haven Avenue, and limitations of adjacent homeowners' access were discussed m detail at a special meeting conducted with representatives from the City's Traffic Engineering Division on February 1, 2005. Suggestions were made to consider additional traffic lane striping at Haven Avenue in front of and in close proximity to the Church to provide center of street striping . and left turn striping for northbound access to the Church Also, public pazking at curb comers and at street intersections m close proximity to the Church were viewed to be a dangerous condition Those in attendance agreed that restricted street pazking on the north side of Vista Grove, red-painted curb corners at Vrvienda Street, Ridge Canyon Road, Ozazk Mountain Place, and Smokey Mountain Place, and restricted pazking on the north side of Vista Grove Avenue would improve traffic and safety concerns As a result of the meeting, the Traffic Engineer stated a formal Traffic Study would not be required by the City because peak traffic flows aze well below Haven Avenue design and engineering standazds; because the proposed project would not have significant impact on planned traffic capacity; and because the traffic generated by the proposed project falls well witlin the design capacity of Haven Avenue. Since that time, the Church has made a concentrated effort to request all members and regulazly attendees to avoid pazking on all adjacent streets by using available on- sitepazking, north field parking, and shuttle pazking at Chaffey Community College. Hillside's Parking Ministry has been expanded to serve and support this added responsibility throughout the construction phase and after completion of the project. This effort continues to be a significant demonstration of pazking management resulting m the elimination of almost all adjacent street pazking • Hillside Community Church New M~mstry Expansion page 4 Report Summary - Neighborhood Meeting Process 4. Chaffey Community College Shuttle Parking • Concern: The long-term use and availabthty of the Chaffey Community College north pazktng lot for Church shuttle pazktng is uncertain, unreliable and causes resident noise pollution at Wtlson Avenue. Response: A 10-yeaz ageement between Chaffey Community College and Hillside Community Church has been adopted meet and support long-term Shuttle Paking needs Together, the College and the Church shaze an established partnership ofcommuntty servtce. Hillstde Community Church servtces were first held at the Chaffey College campus twenty-five years ago. Then about five years ago, the Church entered into an agreement with the College to use the north pazktng lot of the campus to support Hillside's new Shuttle Pazktng mintstry. In response to potential notse concerns raised dunng the Netghborhood Meeting process, the Church relocated the shuttle pazktng staging azea from the north edge to the south stde of the north pazktng lot. The initial intent was to move the Shuttle Pazktng azea as faz away from netghbonng homes along Wtlson Avenue. However, the Church recogntzed that a greater response would be necessazy to meet the long-term needs and expectations of Wilson Avenue restdents, the College, and the Church. As a result, the asstgned shuttle pazktng azea has been relocated to a more centralized portton of the Chaffey campus to respond to a greater use of the shuttle by Church attendees, and to eliminate bus traffic along Wilson Avenue As • a result of the extended shuttle pazkmg agreement, buses will travel to and from the Church to the College by means of Haven Avenue, which is destgned for heavy traffic and optimum vehicular use, thus eliminating the potential for resident notse pollution More than 400 auxthary pazkmg spaces aze avatlable for use by the Church m the newly destgnated azea at Paking Area 18. Thts auxiharypazktng facthtywill be used by pastors, church staff, mtnistry leaders, and regulaz attendees to augment available on-site pazktng. The long-term pazktng agreement establishes a formal commttment by the College and the Church to ensure dependable, reliable, and extended shuttle pazktng wtll be avazlable to Hillstde members and vtsttors for a long time to the future. A copy of the draft agreement is included wtthin the Appendtx of flits report. 5. Church Operations & Programs Concern: Church on-site pazktng operations create congested or unsafe conditions. Response: Pazktng operations and management at Hillstde Community Church consists of on- sttepaved pazktng, on-site field pazktng, and shuttle parking to an auxiliary pazktng Htlls~de Community Church New M~mstry Expansion page 5 Report Summazy - Neighborhood Meeting Process ~x~~a~ ~-~ 6 c, ~, r 3 a site at Chaffey Community College. A Pazking Ministry was established by the Church several yeazs ago to foster more efficient use of on-site faciltties and the auxiliary shuttle sernce, and to mtnimtzecurb-side pazking at adjacent public streets. The pnmary purpose of the Pazkmg Ministry is to provide safe, convenient, and accessible parking options for all visitors and members, and to regulate traffic flows and pedestnan access to minimize any potential Impact upon surrounding traffic and neighborhood quality When entenng Hillside, dnvers aze directed by members of the Parking Ministry Team to available pazking azeas while other attendants facilitate side by side parking and unloading of passengers. Field pazking lanes aze identified by moveable traffic cones, and parking stalls aze identified by removable metal stakes and plastic flags. The metal parking stakes are easily inserted into the turf of the parking field areas to ensure and regulate ve}uculaz spacing Colored plastic flags attached to the end of the metal pazking stakes farther delineate field pazking spaces and lanes. The Church currently employs approximately 12 to 15 Pazktng Ministry attendants on-site before and after each Sunday woislup sernce. Concem: New paved pazkmg and field pazktng azeas will potentially cause automobile headlight intrusion to south property backyazd and living azeas of adjacent Vtvienda Street residents. • Response Anew 7'-0" high yazd wall is proposed at the south property line to be provided as part of the New Ministry Expansion construction. The primary purpose of the yazd wall is to screen automobile headlights from intension into adjacent properties, and to provide additional sound attenuation as descnbed in the following concern. Concem: Church on-site sports and recreational uses potentially cause resident noise pollution at the south property edge adjacent to Vivienda Street residents Response• All current on-site sports and recreational uses which occur at the south baseball fields will remain at past, lustoncal levels of use. The proposed Church expansion does not increase the type or amount of sports and related recreational programs. Overall, sports programs and related use will decrease as a result of the project due to the physical loss of the north and west play fields which will become future building and pazkmg azeas respectively. • Hillside Commum Report Surmnary - An Acoustical Study was performed by the firm of McKay Conant & Brook (MCB) to fiuther address potential sports and recreational noise issues Acoustical analysts was provided to investigate the potential to decrease sound intrusion emanating from parking and sports activities into adjacent backyard and mtenor living azeas. The New Mm~stry Expansion page hood Meeting Process -~x~~ ~-s Z3,c,~, T 33 study, dated February 16, 2005, concluded that a 6'-0" high sound attenuation wall would provide 11 decibels of sound reduction at a point five feet above ground level for any sound source witlvn ten feet of the property line. Sub~echvely, a reduction of 10 decibels equates to a 50% reduction in loudness at neighbonng homes. However, a 6'-0" high sound wall will not provide any benefit to noise levels occtimng at second storywindow locations By companson, an 8'-0" foot high sound attenuation wall would reduce sound by 5 to 6 decibels at neighbonng second level window locations. Since it is possible for ballfield spectators to stand on top of the existing south bleachers, which places their heads above the 6'-0" wall height, a single her bench should be used for spectator use instead of the three-tier bleachers This modtfication will help ensure the adequacy ofthe proposed 6'-0"height. A copy of the MCB Acousttcal Study is included within the Appendix of this report 6. View Impacts Concern: The proposed building height of the project blocks existing views from surrounding residents. Response The current Very Low Density Residential land use and designated R-1-20,000 zoning which surrounds the property restricts maximum building height to 30'-0" above adjacent Bade. However, a vanance (Vanance 83-O1) to construct a 50'-0" high church sanctuary was adopted and approved by the Plannrng Commission (Resolution 83-19) on February 9, 1983. Subsequent design and constructed of the Family Center building resulted m a maximum height of 45'-0" During the Neighborhood Meeting process, strong concerns of surrounding residents were expressed. The ma~onty of concerns were raised from those residents living at the northerly }ugher elevations along the south edge of Carran Road, and from residents living directly across Vtsta Grove. As a result, the proposed building height was reduced from an imttal ndge line height of 52'-0" to 45'-0", and the proposed building pad elevation was reduced by an additional 8'-0". In response to the Neighborhood Meeting process, these modifications resulted to a total height reduction of 15'-0". The proposed design meets the maximum 50'-0" height restriction The highest portion of the second story pitched roof ndge line is 45'-0" above adjacent grade and the primary floor level, and the ma~onty of the building elevations feature vaned heights ranging from 35'-0" to 45'-0" measured from main floor level. The maximum building height of 50'-0" allowed by Vanance 83-O1 benefits overall architectural project relationships, preserves neighborhood compatibility, respects existing neighborhood views and vistas, and is an appropriate consideration for the Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expansion page 7 • Report Summary -Neighborhood Meeting Process g,c, ~p, T 3 `~ pnmazy worship component ofHillside Community Church. Further~ustificarion is supported by the following considerations 1. Proposed grading concepts significantly reduce visible building heights azound the project penmeter. Proposed building wall heights aze equal to or less than the 45 foot height of the existing Family Center Building 3. The architectural quality of sloped residential roof elements benefits the architectural design, and resident's views downward upon the project's roof scape 4. Impact upon surtotindmg residential views and vistas is achieved with little or no impact. The size, scale, and massing of the proposed azchitecture benefits most with greater diversity m height and vanahon of building elements. 6 The proposed project has less visual impact than arow oftwo-story, single- family homes were constructed along the north property edge, facing Vista Grove residents. For all these reasons, a vanance in the maximum building height as previously approved results in optimum neighborhood and architectural quality. The City has allowed vanances to exceed maximum building height for other churches with similaz conditions, locations, and neighborhood relahonslups. Copies ofthe vanous site sections and view studies aze included within the Appendix of this report. 7. Southwest Drainage Capacity Concern: Site drmnage of storm rainwater is insufficient at southwest comer of site causing water to pond at the end of Vivienda Street, and overflow of storm water to adjacent property owner's Response: An existing drainage easement, owned by the Church, connects the southwest comer of the property to a drainage box and curb inlet located at the end of V ivienda Street by means of an open concrete drainage structure. Dunng peak rainfall penods occumng dunng February 2005, on-site field investigations and interviews with ad~acentpropertyownerswereconducted. Churchlandscapecontractoisresponstble for maintenance ofthe drainage easement were tcluded in the process. After several meetings and further investigation, a blockage was discovered under the sidewalk m Hdls~de Community Church New Mm~stry Expansion page 8 Report Summary -Neighborhood Meeting Process the drainage transition box which deposits Church run-off into the Vtvienda Street curb inlet. The extent of debns m the sidewalk transition box showed that periodic cleaning and maintenance was not occttmng Since that time, the Church maintenance contract has been expanded to ensure penodtc cleaning and removal of debns occurs Spot checks performed by the Church and the project Civil Engineer, Dan Guerra and Associates (DGA), during subsequent Mazch rainfall periods show satisfactory performance of the drainage structure. Civil engineering and related drainage plans prepared by DGA for the project have been purposefully designed to ensure that no added dramagerun-off will result from the construction of the proposed project. During construction of the Church Faintly Center, a drainage analysis was performed of the site. The results of the analysts concluded that 5 7 acres of the property be drained to this location with a Q 100 = 21 4 CFS Hydrologic modeling was performed using a school campus site standazd (60% pernous). Proposed development will modify the demand factorby increasing the tributary azea to 6.4 acres (a portion of the proposed Sanctuary Buildtng not originally tributary will drain to this location), and will increase the impervious area by an additional 0.4 acres (the project proposes the addition of a pazking structure on an existing ball field). The project proposes the installation of a 60" diameter detention basin south of the proposed pazking structure to intercept flows from upstream impernous watershed azeas (including the proposed Sanctuary Building and pazking structure, and the existing pazking lot located at the northwest corner ofthe site), and restrict the outlet to detain flows to current levels. 8, Lighting Overflow on Adjacent Property Concern: New pazking lot lighting and some existing site lighting fixtures shine into neighboring hying azeas. Response. New pazking lot lighting is proposed to conform to City standards, such that a maximum lighting level of 1 footcandle occurs at the property edges All new and existing fight fixtures shall be respectively constructed or modified to conform to this standard, and to ensure that all lighting is hooded to prevent glare and direct illttmmation into neighboring living azeas. Hdlsrde Community Church New Ministry Expansion page 9 Report Surtunary -Neighborhood Meeting Process X1'r-s.~3~T t,1-~ C3,ct D. T 3~ ~ W L C Architects ~~ Apn129,2005 furry WoM! AlA • George M Wiens, AIA • Ruben J Hensley, AIA • Jamez P OrComdlo, AIA • Gknn Ueda AIA Mox Medina, A14 • Kellry Needham AIA • Kern A MacOvame, Al4 Donald Granger Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P10500 Crvtc Center Dnve P O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Amendment to Pazking Management and Operations Plan Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expanston DRC Case 2004=01019 Protect 0312500.03 Dear Donald: I am submitting this Amendment to the Pazkmg Management and Operations Plan for the . Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expanston protect. The following information is being provided m response to your completeness review comment 11, page 2. 1 The capacity of each shuttle vehicle is 36 persons The Church owns two vehicles now, and is m the process of purchasing up to three more within the year. 2. Shuttle buses make a complete tnp from the Church to the Chaffey College designated pazking azea every 8-10 minutes. 3 Shuttle service hours of operation aze provtded every Sunday, which presently commence at 7:45 AM (before first service which begins at 8.30 AM) and continues until 12.30 PM (after second service which ends at 12:00 noon) ~ '~~`~ Please contact me at your convenience if you have further questions, r require addittonal information. As always, thank you for your assistance and support. A vo Dore T e. • IOUO Poolbll Boulevord• Ranzho C•wmelpe Cahkrme 91230 3)5<• ph 90998)0909 Im 909 980 9980 • I I IO Iron Poml Read • Swre 100 • Fol•em Colrlornro 95630 8301 • ph 916 355 9922 Im 916 355 9950 1150 a5rh 5rmer•Smre I50•Emepvrlle C•Idomro 96608 2901•ph 510 s5019991a. SIOS802525 J «- 1MlSONAYEIiUE x NoM Palwq Lot s> ~ " ~ ~.~- ""'^ . ~~ Q ~~ ~~~ MC ~~ ~ i aa~o Q ~ ~ ~a ~w ~ ~. ~ ~a,•x^ ~g; ;"yuy zZ a; ,r~e~ ~ PW _ T ~--~ ' ~ ' B' 1 cmmn..n ud ~ 7 ~~j -~~L f C npaa> ~~~~~ ~~~ LJ ;~~~~<rrE, h ~---- -_-_= `® HS aA ~` a ((//°'i Pa1dn0 i-t w + f2 ~ Q. €~(,~~ 1 ~~ _~ PHlaq I CaenusaonAws P1Adnp u ~ ass, ` t~ ~ Dpwrecn i Ams IPOS) ~._~ ~f ~~'' Chaf~ey Cafle~e SNBS Ha+~ss Aacnuq Rancho Cugnsongi, G 91737.7002 ~.chalfeyedu rorau>~r,v,Fn,E -~ Atro-AtroniW[i{ArAtt s5-tra~nr~gonStMSet AD-ACmstispalgn U-Unpsdpl AA! An - Arl LI - L~hnry ATl - ANMsoIM Tecr~igbgj l5 - llM S[Mntt B-6ook:to~e MO-Ws~tllMuseumGYlery 9f - BwKSS EOuanm x100 - tloagr Wsaouni r Onm CCE-Gmpn CesrN Fall Pl-rJishen PYeeurhq~ CCW- 0arpic Cemer Nkst PS - Prryslnl Snenx CD - fSsU l7t+gOCmtn1 CtnUr Sl - Scats La94 CP-CsnpusPdKt SS-Sot+NSOente 1CS-FuhnnECansum Stuoc TA-iti>nwe G?JRn-FarlSkossq CyRnawm YSS-YOt71knN 65t,dmlSwpvl MS-IItrNM $N!(K!S KTI-N'rpn lfap r `~ Pa6q ~~ ~ \~ f ~~ I ~~ ~ a ^7 TEINIS~ ~' __ ._ ._,_ ~~ f1EV sa-05 ~.,_ ~~~ 4:15pm. iENN1S ~ ~ / ~ ~0 R~I6tflpw ~ 2t G11168BYf1ELD +~ ~e `~k,`-,~L L - ~~- is a -._.-_..___.._._._. unLm r ° FrtLO l POOTBAII p tRtAmCFI s~ ~:'vi3~.~~',,~,~~ _._~ IONDER A fQ`EO 22 7tRA1~P0ffTAT10N Q LfASEl9A1L ~~IVIN6 FIELD ---J r M~~°t~E C J u SOCCER JsorTexL ` f~~Lo .._.__~. _....~-.. Y. ~ ___ _ .~. (0851 EDISON COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (909) 989-1751 FAX (909) 989-4287 March 25, 2005 W L C Architects Vtrgmia Dare Tower 10470 Foothill Boulevazd Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention Larry Wolff SubJect Proposed Utilizarion of Existing Baseball Field for Auto Pazking Hillside Cornmumty Church 5354 Haven Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA Gentlemen At your request, we have reviewed the geotechnical feasibility of utilizing an existing baseball field on the lower pad of Hillside Commumty Church for automobile pazkmg Geosoils, Inc. prepazed a compaction report dunng the original grading of the church facility m 1993. Their report indicates that soils within pad azeas were compacted to at least 90% of then maximum dry density. Accordingly, it is expected that the soil will be able to bear the weight of automobiles, although fires could leave ruts if the ground is saturated when used for pazkmg or ~f landscaping loosened soils If necessary, it is expected that this could be mittgating by recompacting surface soils We trust thus letter will serve your needs at this time In you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us Respectfully, RMA Gr up . ~ f Ed L ~, PE ~~~ President GE 2362 ~x~~~- ~ RMA Job No 04-314-01 t2 ~ C ~ D~ Z 3~ M~KAY CONANT BROOK we Consultants to Acoustus and Media Systems Mr. Larry Wolf WLC Architects 10470 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Sublect• Hillside Community Church Analysis of Proposed Sound Wall Along the South Property Line MCB Protect No. 05006 Dear Larry: Ementus W Rollins Brook 16 February 2005 As you have requested, this letter summarizes our assessment, findings and recommendations regarding the proposed installation of a 6-foot tall sound wall along the south property line of the Hillside Community Church in Rancho Cucamonga, California. It is our understanding that the church would like to provide the residents to the south of the property with some relief from noise produced by sports and parking activities on the ball fields and from music generated inside the youth ministry classrooms. DESCRIPTION OF CHURCH PROPERTY Figure 1 shows the existing layout of the ball fields, ministry classrooms and church parlung in relation to the resident's homes along the south property line. The location of the ball fields, rrunistry classrooms and parking spaces are all relatively close to the resident's homes -typically 40 to SO-feet apart. There is an existing cmu retaining wall that runs along the entire length of the south property line between the church property and resident's homes. The height of the wall is approximately 5-feet above the ground from the southeast comer of the property to about the east most trunistry classroom building and then it decreases in height to about 2 to 3-feet above the ground from the ministry classroom buildings to the southwest corner of the ball fields. Based upon observations made in the field, we have detemuned that the existing cmu retaining wall is not an effective sound wall. It is simply not tall enough to break the line of sight between the church property and resident's homes along most of the property line. Walls that do not break line of sight between the source (church) and receiver (residents) will not provide any attenuation or benefit to the residents. ~iC~csg=T' R j~j i C~ ~ Z' '-~ ~ 5655 I.mdero Canyon Roed Suite 325 Westlake V~Ilage CA 91362 8189919300 EAx 8189912324 info®MCBtnccom 8571 Fast Va de Rlsa Swttsdale AZ 85258 vacF/EAx 480 9518641 mfo®MCBinc tom FEB 2 S 2005 Ronald L McKay David A Conant M`KAY CONANT BROOK iN~ The layout of the church property will be modified to some degree as a result of the proposed construction of the New Worshrp Center. Figure 2 shows the new layout of the church property. The location of the ball fields will remain unchanged however; the church is planning on using the ball fields for 119 new parking spaces. The ministry classrooms, which were irnmediately adiacent to the south property line, will be replaced with 40 new parking spaces. The activities tamed out to the rtiinistry classrooms (including music) will be relocated to the existing Family Center located to the tiuddle of the church property. ANALYSIS Our analysts and assessment of the effectiveness of the new 6-foot tall sound wall is based on the new church property layout. The attenuation provided by a sound wall depends upon the source and receiver distances from the sound wall, as well as the source and receiver elevations with respect to one another and the sound wall. Therefore, the attenuation provided by a 6-foot sound wall along the south property line was detemuned using a scaled site plan, topographically information, estimates of source and receiver locations and elevations and MCB's noise bamer prediction software. As part of our analysis, we examined the performance of a 6-foot tall sound wall for the following activities on the church property: 1) Spectators/athletes at vanous locations on the ball fields and on the bleachers. We modeled spectators and athletes as sound sources which were 5-feet above the ground at various locations throughout the ball fields. In addition, we modeled spectators as sound sources standing on top the 3-tiered bleachers to provide a worse case assessment of the sound wall performance. We modeled spectators and/or athletes 10, 65, 100 and 150-feet away from the south property line. 2) Vehicle activities on the ball fields and in the new parking spaces along the south property line. We modeled vehicles as sound sources located 3-feet above the ground. We modeled cars 15 and 60-feet away from the south property line. In all of our predictions, we modeled the receiver locations at the resident's homes to be 5-feet and 15-feet above the elevation of the resident's backyards. The 15-foot elevation was our estimate of the elevation of the resident's second floor windows. The attenuation provided by a 6-foot sound wall was tamed out for both receiver elevations to assess the wall's performance. Please note that we did not assess the performance of the new sound wall with respect to music generated to the ministry classrooms because these activities will be moved to the Family Center. This move will significantly benefit the residents because the music will be located 200-feet further away from the homes. With the classrooms inside the Fatnily Center building and the doors and windows of the building closed, we expect that the music associated with the youth tntnismes will no longer be audible at the resident's homes. ~1~~-~~T '~- ~ J) Cl~a~i2T 5 LI' I M`KAY CONANT BROOK ,N~ RESULTS Ball Field Noise -Receiver Location 5-feet above Grade. A 6-foot tall sound wall will reduce noise generated by spectators and athletes on the ball fields by 9 to 10 decibels at a receiver location 5-feet above the ground at the resident's homes, except when spectators are standing on the top tier of the two sets of south most bleachers. The heads of these spectators are expected to be located above the top of the 6-foot sound wall and thus no acoustical benefit will be provided to the resident's when spectators are standing on these bleachers. Sub~ecnvely, a reduction of 10 decibels equates to a 50 percent reduction in loudness at the resident's homes. We anticipate that the resident's would readily nonce a 10-decibel reduction in noise at their homes. Ball Field Noise -Receiver Location 15-feet above Grade. Our calculations show that a 6-foot tall sound wall will not provide any attenuation to noise generated by spectators and athletes located more than 10-feet away from the sound wall at the second floor windows of the resident's homes. The sound wall is simply not tall enough to block line of sight between these source and receiver locations. A 6-foot tall sound wall is expected to provide approximately 5 to 6 decibels of attenuation at the second floor windows with spectators and athletes located within a 10-foot distance of the proposed sound wall. Since it is unrealistic to keep spectators and athletes within a 10-foot distance of the 6-foot sound walls, a taller sound wall tray be needed in order to provide a benefit to the second story windows. Please note that it is unclear to MCB if noise is even an issue at the second story windows of the residents. It may not be if the resident's keep their windows closed throughout the year. If noise is an issue at the second floor of the resident's homes, we have deterrriined that a minimum 8-foot tall sound wall would be required at the south property line in order to provide any attenuation to spectators and athletes. If an 8-foot tall sound wall were constructed, it would provide approximately S to 6 decibels of attenuation to the noise generated by the spectators and athletes 5-foot above the ground. A 5 to 6 decibel reduction in noise level would yield a noticeable change m noise levels at the resident's homes. The 8-foot tall wall would dust barely break the line of sight between the spectators and residents second floor windows with spectators standing on top of the bleachers. Our calculations indicate that the 8-foot tall sound wall would provide little or no attenuation to those spectators standing on top of the bleachers. Vehicle Noise -Receiver Location 5-feet above Grade. We anticipate that a 6-foot tall sound wall at the south property line will provide at least 11 decibels of attenuation to vehicle noise at a receiver location 5-feet above the ground with vehicles located on the ball fields or in anyone of the new parking spaces. As indicated above, a 10-deabel reduction translates into noise being half as loud at the resident's homes. i Page 3iof 5 M`KAY CONANT BROOK rNc . Vehicle Noise -Receiver Location 15-feet above Grade. We anticipate that a 6-foot tall sound wall at the south property line will provide 5 to 7decibels of attenuation to vehicle noise at the second floor windows with vehicles located on the ball fields or in anyone of the new parking spaces. A 5 to 7-decibel reduction will be a clearly noticeable reduction in noise at the resident's homes. RECOMMENDATIONS Sound Wall Construction The calculations far the attenuation provided by the sound wall assume that all of the noise goes over the top of the wall and not through it. In order to make this assumption true in the field, the surface weight of the new sound wall must be at least 4 pounds per square foot. Therefore, we recommend that the sound wall be constructed from one of the following acoustically acceptable materials: 1 or 2-inch thick (min.) concrete panels, 2-inch thick exterior grade wood, 1-inch thick stucco or 3/4-inch thick transparent acrylic panels (such as Cyro Paraglas Soundstop). Other materials can be used provided they meet the minimum surface weight requirement. The sound wall should extend from the southeast to the southwest corner of the church property, as is shown in Figure 2. We recommend the sound wall be constructed 6-feet above the ground (elevation taken on the church property side of the wall), unless noise is an issue at the second story windows of the residents. If noise is a concern at these windows, then we recommend a minimum 8-foot tall sound wall along the property hne. Regardless of height, the bottom of the sound wall should contact the ground or top of the cmu retaining wall along its entire length so that there are no gaps or openings at the bottom of the wall. In addition, panels should be rightly butted together so that there are no ioints or gaps between the ends of panels. The existing tube steel fence might be used to fully or partially support the new sound wall. Bleachers Since it is possible for spectators to stand on top of the existing south most bleachers, which is expected to place their heads above the top of a 6-foot sound wall, we recommend the use of single tier benches in lieu of the existing 3-tiered bleachers. This recommendation will help ensure that the 6-foot tall sound wall provides maximum attenuation to the residents standing 5- feet above the ground. It will also ensure that the spectator's heads are below the 8-foot tall sound wall at the second floor windows, if that sound wall is ultimately deemed necessary. • ~XHZQz~" ~-3 p tC i D Yage 4 of 5 M`KAY CONANT BROOK iNc Ttus concludes our analysis, findings and recorntnendanons for the subject project. Should you have any questions regarchng the information above, please call. Sincerely, M`KAY CONANT BROOK INC Michael SantaMana, Semor Consultant MPS:bh Enclosures: Figures 1 and 2. G~PROJHCIS (sa)\WLC\05006 • I-Lllsde CC CommunuY Noue~Documena~FIdlnde Commuiury Church Sound Well doc • -~~~-~.~~- ~-y B,ciiag ~ oT ~ ~~ ~ T~ ~ l- ~ I, ,, :~. ~ -~ j ~ ~ ~ .? 3`~ Wi Y ~ ~ W ~ u- ~~ r F~ s e ~ . ~ ~ ~ N' ~ ~ ~ ~~~ -- --boo --- --- =E ~ ~ -i~ ~ ~~~~i~~i.i~~ i e6 : : - - II - - r - - -~ ~~ ~ - __ `~ h - 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~i a~ a~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.50 p m Donald Granger May 31, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 77,500 square foot worship center on 8.86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street - APN• 1074-271-01 Related files Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP82-29, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Vanance DRC2005-00323 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Desion Parameters The 8 86 acre site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street The church site was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29, with the exception of the architectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Conditional Use Permit 88-10 also included the master plan for the church In 1994, the church completed its first permanent budding, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose budding that is presently used for worship services The proposed sanctuary is in substantial compliance with the approved master plan (Conditional Use Permit 88-10) The proposed sanctuary, with a seating capacity of 1,400, is actually smaller that the 1,500 seats that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 88-10 The current proposal, as all previously approved proposals, includes the use of the lower ball field for parking This ball field was constructed and compacted to accommodate vehicles. The ball field parking, plus the parking structure, will provide additional on-site parking The applicant is proposing to construct a 77,500 square foot worship center, which includes administrative offices, classrooms, and a sanctuary The two portable buildings that function as Sunday School classrooms will be removed with the construction of the new sanctuary The worship floor area of the sanctuary is 13,056 square feet Also, proposed is a bi-level parking structure that will provide 101 parking stalls The sanctuary has been designed to connect to the existing Family Center The parking structure has been designed to maximize the use of the grades on the site, with the first level being underground and bwlt into an existing slope The second level will take access from the north parking lot. The parking structure has been designed with aver rock base on the south and west elevations Landscape slopes buttressed by a keystone retaining wall surround the three exposed sides (west, south, and east elevations) of the parking structure An arbonst surveyed the physiological and structural condition of the all trees affected by the proposed sanctuary The proposed sanctuary will affect 138 trees that qualify as heritage trees under the City's Tree Ordinance Of the 138 existing trees affected by the proposed sanctuary, 16 trees will be relocated, and 122 trees are proposed for removal The applicant is proposing to install 95 trees, which will be comprised of 3 species (London Plane, Strawberry, and Sweetgum) All species will be a 24-inch box size, and will complement the existing plant palette The entire 8 8 acre protect site requires a total of 255 trees, based upon the ratios in the Development Code for parking stalls and lineal feet of building wall plane The entve protect site will have a total of 308 trees (197 existing, 95 new trees, 16 relocated), which is a surplus of 53 trees Since the protect site will exceed the regwred tree ratios, the proposed removal of 122 trees is consistent with the original master plan with regard to regwred landscape and tree ratios ~x~g=-~- s ~~ ~~ D~ T y e DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2004-01019 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH May 31, 2005 Page 2 Variances Two Variances are needed for the proposed sanctuary• One Variance (DRC2005-00321) is proposed to allow for a building height from 30 feet to 45 feet, where a maximum height of 30-foot is permitted The other Variance is needed for retaining walls because of the below grade pad elevation of the sanctuary (DRC2005-00323). The budding has been designed to dig-in to the existing grades on the protect site, thus minimizing the wew impacts on surrounding residents. The sanctuary budding pad elevation will regwre approximately 13 feet of excavation below the present grade. The sanctuary building has a pad elevation that ranges from 6 to 30 feet below the street grades of Haven Avenue, and 30 feet below the street grade of Vista Grove Street The sanctuary has been designed to provide seamless architectural integration with the existing Family Center budding, matching the exterior materials palette (river rock base, tilt up concrete with plaster finish, file roof) and fenestration patterns All roof-mounted mechanical egwpment will be screened by the roof plane and a screen wall. A Variance is also being requested to reduce the regwred average landscape setback from 45 feet to 25 feet along Haven Avenue to allow construction of more parking stalls m the northeast corner of the site The area proposed for parking sits approximately 5 to 8 feet below Haven Avenue; hence, is not visible from the street Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to provide an outime for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect None -the applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve all mattor design issues Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 In order to soften the visual impact of the tilt-up, concrete bi-level parking structure on the single-family residences to the west, climbing vines should be planted at the base of the concrete columns at the top of the landscape slopes Planning staff recommends Parthenocissus Tncuspidata (E3oston Ivy) because of its ability to attach itself to concrete wall planes and changing leaf colors m the fall. Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. 1. Where fieldstone or aver rock is used, it shall be real; manufactured fieldstone or aver rock is not permitted Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that with the above-identified Secondary Issue addressed, the Design Review Committee review the protect and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Desion Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Donald Granger The Committee recommended approval subtect to staff's recommendation STR_DOCUMENT_VIEW . Document Name :CUP 58-10 ~~~ • ~~ ~1 +~ 1 `Y MI ti mil,' y i`,. i ~ ~: °~. u~, -- ~~,~ ' , a ~•n1 a .~,._~ . ~. i ~i ~ ypvm P~Y~.a~+ g~PcCF.g (Phacf~~} CITY ~ RANCI-IJ CUCAMC PL.UYNtNO ialVb'IG~V L >~~~ ~- 4 /tiptn~G~frtioN .v ~. ~f~~ >I u15P~) rr~t~~Q 9"~ ~~ ~ ExHie~r A sc~ Page 1 oY 1 ~~~T p,s tl9 hrtn //crv-lasert`iche/webhnk/DocV~ew aso~DocumentID=142698&FolderID=13024&SearchH 8/9/2004 •~SLLZ.G~oJ -c7c.~-x.1 W L C Architects . Inrry WoNl, AN • George M Wiens, AW • Robert I Hensley, AIA • lames P DlCamllb, WA • Glenn Ueda, AIA Max Medmo, AIA • Kelley Needham, AlA • Kevin A MocCarorne, AU Apn17, 2005 Justification for Variance for Maximum Building Height Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expansion DRC Case 2004-01019 Project 0312500.03 The current Very Low Density Res~denhal land use and designated R-1-20,000 zoning which surrounds the property restncts maxunum building height to 30'-0" above adjacent grade. However, a vanance (V anance 83-01) to construct a 50'-0" high church sanctuary was adopted and approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution 83-19) on February 9, 1983 Subsequent design and constructed of the Family Center building resulted m a maximum height of 45'-0". Dunng the Neighborhood Meetingprocess, strong concems ofsurroundingrestdents were expressed The ma~onty of concems were razsed from those residents ]tvmg at the northerly higher elevations along the south edge of Carran Road, and from res>dents living directly across Vista Grove. As a result, the proposed building height was reduced from an imtial ndge line height of 52'-0" to 45'-0", • and the proposed bu~ldmg pad elevation was reduced by an additional 8'-0". In response to the Neighborhood Meeting process, these modifications resulted to a total height reduction of 15'-0". The proposed design meets the maxtmum 50'-0" hetght restnction. The highest portion ofthe second story pitched roof ndge tine is 45'-0" above adjacent grade and the pnmary floor level, and the ma~onty of the building elevations feature vaned heights ranging from 35'-0" to 45'-0" measured from main floor level. The maxtmum building height of 50'-0" allowed by Vanance 83-01 benefits overall architectural project relationships, preserves neighborhood compatibility, respects existing neighborhood views and vistas, and is an appropnate consideration for the pnmary worship component of Hillside Commumty Church. Further~ustification is supported by the following considerations. 1. Proposed grading concepts s~gmficantly reduce visible building heights around the project penmeter. 2. Proposed building wall heights are equal to or less than the 45 foot height of the existing Family Center Building. 3. The azchitectural quahtyofsloped residential roof elements benefits the architectural design, . and resident's views downwazd upon the project's roof scape. Nry~rw OorvT •104)0 FaaM1illBwkw~d•ROrwM Curommpa C•lilo.n~o 91)30 3)54•ph 90998) 0909 Im 9099809980 1110Imn Wpm Rood • Smro 400 • Fd.om C•Idwnw 95630 0301 • pF 916 355 9924 b. 9)6 355 9950 14504M Arwl•Sun. 150 •Emam~ll. ColAwm~•94608 4901•pl~ 5104501999 b. 51045045]5 4. Impact upon surrounding residential views and vistas is achieved with ltttle or no Impact 5 The size, scale, and massing of the proposed architecture benefits most with greater diversity m height and vanatton of building elements. 6. The proposed protect has less visual impact than a row of two-story, single-family homes were constructed along the north property edge, facing Vista Grove residents For all these reasons, a vanance m the maximum building height as previously approved results m optimum neighborhood and architectural quality The City has allowed vanances to exceed maximum building height for other churches with similar conditions, locations, and neighborhood relationships . JusUficahon for Vanance m Maximum Hugh[ page 2 Hillside Community Church New Mimsny Expansion ~1Gk-4~~ `1-~ $,C,~p,TSI ~~LZooS- o o3ZZ W L C Archltectsl luny WoHI, P1A • George M Wrenx WA • Robert 1 Hensley, WA • times P DiCamdlo, AIA • Glenn Ueda, NA Max Medina, AN • Kelley Needhom, NA • Kevin A MocQwme, Al4 Apn17, 2005 Justification for Variance for Parking in Haven Avenue Landscape Corridor Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expansion DRC Case 2004-01019 Project 0312500.03 The current standards for the Haven Avenue Landscape Comdor regmre a mtmmum landscape pazktng setback of 35'-0", which is measured from the face of the street curb to the beginning of the pazktng stall Dunng the Neighborhood Meeting process, strong concerns were expressed by surrounding residents regazdmg the quanrity of additional on-site pazktng proposed for the project. Although the proposed design more than doubles available on-site pazktng, the Church is attempting to maximize all available parking opporhtnities. This variance allows 23 spaces to be constructed withun at the north east corner of the site, within the Haven Avenue Landscape Comdor. Due to the quantity and quality of existing landscaping, and because of the specific grade relationships m the immediate azea of the site, the visual impact from Haven Avenue is viewed to be negligible. Further justification is supported by the following considerations. Pakking will be increased from a proposed total of 524 spaces to 547 spaces. Based upon 1 space/35 square feet of worship seating space, 375 spaces are required by the City's current zoning ordinance 2. Improvements for the 23 spaces will not be vistble from Haven Avenue. 3. Opporturuhes for on-site pazktng aze maximtzed. In conclusion, the Church is requesting consideration of this vanance to demonstrate their commitment to providing the maximum amount of pazktng possible for the project Viryima OereT .i0•)O Feahill BouLrord. ROrMn Cucomwga CoGfomlo 9l )30 3)5••ph 90998)09091va. 9099809980 I1 I O Iron W n~ eood • Sum 200• Fol.em CWAamq 95630 8301. ph 916155 992] k. 916 355 9950 1250 ~~h Src•n•5um 150 •EmerynlH C•Ganv 9.608 2901. ph 510 X501999 b. 510 •502525 C3,e, ~, Z'S~ ~ W L C Architects Lorry WoIR, AIA • George M Wrtns, AU • Ruben 1 Hensley, AIA • lames P DiComAb, AU • Glenn Uedo, AIA Max ono, AIA • Kelky Needham, AIA • Kevin A MocQmme, AU Apn129,2005 Justification for Retaining Wall Variance Hillside Community Church New Ministry Expansion DRC Case 2004-01019 Pro~ect0312500.03 A variance m the allowed maximum retaining wall height beyond four feet and up to twelve feet benefits overall architectural project relations}ups, preserves neighborhood residential compatibility, respects existing neighborhood views and vistas, and is an appropnate consideration for the proposed church campus design. Further~ustification is supported by the following considerations. Proposed grading concepts significantly reduce visible building heights around the protect penmeter and require strategic use ofretamed terraces to step the project development with the natural grade of the site. 2. Proposed retatmng wall heights are appropnate to the scale of the project, and aze mostly concealed to view because they aze• 1.) hidden in the building structure, 2.) integrated into landscaped slopes, and 3) use aesthetically pleasing "keystone block" configurations. The use of the proposed retazmng wall configurations benefit the azchitectural design, and greatly preserve resident's views downwazd upon the project site. 4 Visual Impact upon surrounding residential views and vistas is actueved with negligible Impact For all these reasons, the applicant believes that a vanance as proposed favorably achieves optimum neighborhood and azchitectural quality. For further information, please contact Larry Wolff, AIA, Pnnctpal, at WLC Architects, Inc., (909) 987-0909, extension 2220. Vvgmio Dore Toxr • 10170 FoolhJl Bovlemrd • Rancho Cucamonga, Caldomia 91730 375<• ph 909 9B7 0909 k• 909 980 9980 1110 bon Poinr Road • Svire 200 • Folsom, Caldornia 95630 8301 • ph 916 355 9922 lax 916 355 9950 12501S1h Ssreer • Svne 150 • Emeryville, Coldornio 91608 2901• ph 510 150 7999 1ax 510 050 2525 )3 ,C,D,Z53 r _ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Clry of Rancho Cucarrwnga (Please type or prtnf clearly us/ng Ink Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planmrg Omsion 1~) an-zrso The~ptirpose of this form is to,inform the City of the basic'components`oftpe proposed ~, _k-_,:" . ;projectso~that the"City may review the project pursuant to;CityPolicies; Ordinances, and .y Guidelines; the -California' Environmental °Quality sAct.r and :the City's: ;Rules-,and ;Procedures~to~ImplementCEQA.- It is important that•the information~reguested.in this °a llcatiori°be rovidecl InfulL~ . ~ ,Y.~ ;_~.;: ~. ~;~' ~;r~~y~~;~.,,..~~~Tti~.~;~~~;,,~~~j~ti~ x.~`. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that/t/s the responsiblliry of the applicant [o ensure that the application Is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required [o provide missing mformabon _ _ _ , ~_ ~,~ „ for the prolect to which this form pertains U2c?~s-Gb?i-Bz~TREE /eF~to/sYL ~Efuf/T~ Protect Trtle. Hillside Community Church -New Ministry Expansion Name & Address of prolect owner(s) Hlllslde Commnuity Church, 5354 Haven Ave, Alta Loma CA 91737 Name & Address o/ developer or prolect sponsor WLC Architects, 10470 Foothill Blvd, Tower Suite, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 92821 Contact Person & Address Brian Payne, Protect Manager, WLC Architects, 10470 Foothill Blvd, Tower Swte, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 92821 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if dlHerent lrom above) Telephone Number 909 987 0909 x2323 {{LLJJ ~ OT vironm~ntallnfoF~ doc Page 1 of 1 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM g,c, D, Z 5'~ indicated by an asterisk (') is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff 3) Protect Locanon (describe) Lot 1 of the Schwalter subdivision in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, CA, as per book 19 page 75 of maps in the office of County Recorder of said county except there from easterly 33' 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) APN 1074-271-01-0-000 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq ff) 10 12 'S) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed 8 97 dedications) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet if necessary) n/a 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary tram the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to Cully implement the protect 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stabil~ry, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Ave and Vista Grove St There is an equestrian trail amolg Haven Ave on the eastern edge of the site The property has been previously graded so as to step . down with the sloping grade from north to south The graded berms currently contain mature trees and foliage The southwest corner of the site contains a level playing fled with turf and softball backstops Located on the site Is one permenant structure and three modular structures There Is also a snackbar and adjacent tensile shade structure The site contains surface parking and Is accessible from Haven and EnvironmentallnfoFonn doc Page 2 of 2 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM B, C,D, L55 'i) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and indicate the site 6oundanes 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of signiffcant /eatures from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph Vesta Grove 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or hrstoncal aspects of the site Cite ell sources o/ information (books, published reports and oral history) None known . 1 f) Descnbe any noise sources and them levels that now affect the site (aircreft, roadway noise, etc) and how they wdl affect proposed uses There Is low to moderate traffic nofse from vehicular traffic on Haven Ave and Vesta Grove Noise well have low impact on proposed uses 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon o/the site rn terms ofultimate use that will result /rom the proposed pro/ect Indicate tf [here are proposed phases /or development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) i(necessary The New Ministry expansion will include a 1400 seat flat-floored sanctuary to be used for multiple purposes, including basketball, volleyball, and banquets There is also a large multipurpose room and kitchen on the first floor and three large children ministry spaces on the second floor Offices and storage space is included on both levels with the main church office located on the fvst floor • EnNronmenlallnfoForm doc Page 3 of 3 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM ~iei ~,='S(o 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeroial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, /rontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The surrounding neighborhood is lew density residential with single famrly homes, up to two stones • 14) WWII the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the prolect~ No The proposed berm height and setbacks from the street will minimize the scale and presence of the proposed expansion from the sorrounding properties - 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, rncludmg source and amount How wdl these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed Expected short term & long termnoise will not differ from current conditions Existing noise types Include rellgeous services and casual use of the playfields '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature orscenic trees proposed building location will require removal of temporary planting including mature trees on existing berms per original approved master plan No mature trees will be removed from edge of property and new trees will be planted ad acent to new bulldin to soften views EnvironmenfallnfoForrn doc Page 4 of 4 Created on 5/22!2002 4 09 PM B Ie, p, T 5'l 17) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic wafer supplies) into which the site drams rt/a 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For further clanf~cation, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnc[ at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommeroiaUlnd (gaUday/ac) 3.000 00 Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 6.000 00 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal ®Sephc Tank ^ Sewer I/septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage esbmates) For further clan/~cat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987-2591 a Residenhal(gal/day) b CommeroiaUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) ~~0, Oo RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number ofresidenbalunits • Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (md~ca[e whether units are rental or /or sale units) 21) Anticipated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to Rent (per month) $ to $ ~) Speciry number of bedrooms by unit type Env~ronmentallnfoForm doc Page 5 of 5 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM a,~,n,z5g 23) Indicate anhapated household sze by unit type EnvironmentallnfoFOrm doc Page 6 of 6 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project Contact the appropnate School Distncts as shown rn Attachment 8 a Elementary 0 b Junior Hrgh ~ c Senior Hrgh ~ COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major /unctron(s) of commercial, rndustnal or instrtutronal uses Rellgeous Instltutlon 26) Total /loor area of commercial, rndustnal, or institutional uses by type propOSed 76,000 S f 27) Indicate hours of operation VAR I E~ 28) Number of employees Total UNKNt7t-J~ Maximum Shift VA21ES Time of Maximum Shift VARIES 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated lob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an rnd~cahon of the rate of hire for each classrficatron (attach additional sheet rf necessary) . „,,,.. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside rn the City fu iou~) '31) For commercial and rndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be vended through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Distnct, at (818) 572-6283) Na EnvironmentallnfoFOrm doc Page 7 of 7 Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM f3,~,D, zoo ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies senrmg the pro/act been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed prolecty If so, please indicate them response Water, fire, and flood control angencles currently serve existing site Protect uses septic system 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable I~quids and gases Also note underground storage o/ any o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well es [he dates o/use, it known No 34) Wdl the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic . matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory o/all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans No 1 hereby certly that the statements furnished above and rn [he attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/act to the best of my ability, that [he facts, statements, and rnformat~on presented are true and correct tot he best o/my knowledge and belief I /urther understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date Io~S/Dt-I Signature Title WLC Protect Manager 1 ~ Page 8 of 8 ~ I Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM Env~ronmentallntoForm doc L \2003\03125\2-00\Orawmgs\Arc~rtectural\03215-Af0 awg U - - ~`~ --J V ~~ :, . _f Val ~~= sot O x$ ~; ga ~ L'6 1 ~ ~p ~ d• E ^~ - - i ~ . L_._, ~-.-, ~ ~ n -rrrn ~_,-~ f-~-~ ~ ~ _ Ju JJ. LLJ_~ >---1 r~ - r-r7 ! r-ry r- -r~ r7 rr _a _y ~a A ~y ~___. r [i C-~_7 r~ h r r-r_~ r-_r_~ I l ~ L I J C r__~ LJ _, i r1 ~ L_I_J L_I-J _ _ _ L_[J 2 L_I_J LJ ~ _~ ~ LJ 4-I-a LJ-J ~ L_I J ' F-~_y L-I-J ~ L -J L ~ -y Fy ~ r~ "-i r-r~ F-~-1 . -~-1 r~ .7 [7 r-r~ rti-y r-r7 r~ a , r-i ~ r-ri r-r~ r~ CJ_J rT~ r=1=1 r-I O lJ_J CJ_J L_I_J LJ f1 _ _ - _ _ - _ O _o _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ J ~~Cf~~T ~a O U,C,D,~ lv3 t.. ~.._. (~~\J ~ - , ~ =- iF1 HY .N 4M.GVU.e~xS'a .- r,+ .. .. .. .- si- _~ ,.~ i_~Y - . • ~ O ~J +~. -~u2, ~•~.. L~r ~ Y ~ ~ ~ Zr i y ' ~ , Zvi` >i k M1ry' I - ~I • _ r ~ , ~ :~`i _. ..._._,..'~ PJ , C ~ •D, T Lv5 ._~ 0 ~,C, D. _ (~Co ~ o • ,o B,C,D~~ (o`l ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i.,~ ~ ~~ti ' ~ ) ~ ~ ~ n ~.•r ~-+ i v „ _ i„ ~~ ~,• 1 a r ~~ a 5" ~ ~. f ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ n `- .. r ~ ~ ~ . ~ "4 t ~ ~ hTT' 'tom ~ ~ 'Ray.~J :lyy~ }K. .~~ LM ~ ~+~IF ., ~ • aJi Yln r .~ • `J ~' ~ ~ _ £ >e City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2004-01019 2. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, CUP 96-03, CUP 88-38, CUP 88-10 and CUP 82-29, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 3. Description of Project ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019 - HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a two-story 76,019 square foot worship center and 101-stall parking structure center on 8 86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven and Vista Grave Street - APN 1074-271-01 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: WLCArchitects Attn Larry Wolff 10470 Foothill Boulevard, Tower Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92821 5. General Plan Designation: Residential 6. Zoning: Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): The site is an existing church campus located on the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street The 8 86 acre site is currently developed with a 7,700 square foot multi-purpose budding (Family Center), modular Sunday School Classrooms, Activity Pavilion, baseball fields, and 241 paved parking stalls Surrounding land uses consist of single-family residences Street improvements have been completed along the entire protects frontage along Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street 8 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 u $,C,D,~ l~°I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR - Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Av Quality Management Distract URBEMIS2002 -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages '(/) Aesthetics {/) &ological Resources () Hazards & Hazardous Materials (/) Mineral Resources () Public Services O Utddies/Service Systems () Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology/Water Qualty () Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Noise O Recreation () Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Sods (/) Land Use/Planning () Population/Housing (/) Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) 1 find that although the proposed project could environment, there will not be a significant effect 1n project have been made by, or agreed to, by the NEGATIVE CLARATION wdl be prepared. Prepared By i Reviewed By have a significant effect on the this case because revisions in the project proponent. A MITIGATED Date ~~ `l-~~5~ Date ~/ • ~jC,~,i.70 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Less Than L9ae Issues and Supporting Information Sources sv~n=~~ flh Mi4p ban si nficent No ~ ect Inco tea I I act 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldmgs within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views m the area Comments: a) The prolect site is within a scenic vista/scenic highway view corridor, the Haven Avenue Corridor It is the City's desire to have permanent locations within the City where scenic vistas of the foothills, in particular, can be leisurely enjoyed Turnouts at the northern terminus of these roadways (Haven, Archibald, Milliken, Etiwanda Avenues, as well as the Day Creek Channel) provide an unsurpassed opportunity to create these vista points The applicant is requesting a height variance (for a bwlding height of 45 feet, where a maximum bwlding height of 30 feet is allowed) and a landscape variance (to reduce the landscape setback from 45 feet to 25 feet along Haven Avenue to allow for additional parking stalls) Because the depressed pad elevation of the sanctuary and the bwlding setback from Haven Avenue (118 feet), impacts are anticipated to be less-than-significant b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic bwldmgs within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The proposed prolect is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street and within the Very Low Residential District (VL) To the north, south, and west are single-family dwelling units Currently the site is developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, softball field, and 241 paved parking stalls The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is required prior to approval Cary standards requre the developer to underground the existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution The proposed prolect would not have a negative aesthetic impact once the landscaping variance is approved d) The prolect will create new light and glare as new structures are proposed The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on the Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that regwre shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare A photometric study was completed to ensure that the upper level of the parking structure and the expansion of the existing parking lot would not cause glare on the single-family dwelling units located west and south of the property The parking U, C, ~, T rI l Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 structure is located 60 feet east of the west property line that separates the church and single-family residences The parking structure will generate 0 foot candle illumination at the shared property line, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5 foot candles The expansion of the grade level parking lot at the south property line will result in a maximum of 20-foot candle illumination on the residential properties south of the parking lot, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles The 20-foot candle illumination will occur 10 feet south of the shared property line A 10-foot wide landscape planter is located on the church's property at the south property line, and upon maturity of trees, the 20-foot candle illumination will be reduced further The impact is anticipated to be less-than-significant Less Than Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Poteralelly Spnlflceni soNflcan, an MiopaOOn '"'" SlgNflcam No I acY Into te0 I I 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Wtlliamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) This developed site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove and is characterized by single-family development to the north, south, east, and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability are doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Wtlliamson Act contracts within the City c) This developed site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove and is characterized by single-family development to the north, south, east and west The nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles southeast from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated ~P~rc, ~,T~a Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 u City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 1»aa man ~a~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°`~"~'Y S~prvficant s'°"'fi`°"' M A4Upaoan Than SiOrvfitant No I Int tad I I acl 3. AIR DUALITY. Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violatioM c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () (/) ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State air quality standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect site is currently developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, baseball Field, and 241 paved parking stalls The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b/d) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Av Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) on aprotect-specific basis The Hillside Community Church development includes the construction of a 1,400-seat worship facility and a 101-stall parking structure on approximately 886 acres on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street New development would . add to pollutant levels in the area during construction and protect operations The criteria pollutants screened for included Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), Nitrogen Oxides Pj,C,D,T'73 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 (NO,), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Fine Particulate Matters (PM,o) The air quality impacts caused during the protect development are discussed below in the Construction Emissions section, and long-term operational impacts are discussed in the Operations Emissions section The emission levels listed reflect the estimated winter season levels, which are normally higher because of increased use of heating systems Construction Emissions Generally, construction of a prolect this size would exceed SCAQMD thresholds during grading activities for PM,o and NOx Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) would be generated Residential developments exist to the north, south, east, and west of the protect site The site would create a minimal impact to air quality durng construction, with the greatest emissions being released from the construction vehicles on-site The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 2002 (URBEMIS2002) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the gwdance of the San Joagwn Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distract, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects Though not regwred, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures The prolect site consists of approximately 8 86 acres However, approximately half of the prolect site is developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, baseball field, and 24t paved parking stalls Therefore, 4 48 acres was analyzed as new developmenUdisturbed property Table 1 and 1 A show construction emission results Table 1 ~° - ~' URBEMIS2002 Site Grading Emissions Summary !Pounds oer Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM,a Fu hive Dust - - - 20 0 Off-Road Diesel 17 2 144 2 118 0 6 7 Worker Tri s 0 2 0 3 4 7 0.02 Total 17 4 144 5 122 7 26 9 SCAOMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 Si mficance No Yes No No Source Lilburn Corp-URBEMIS2002 Table 1A URBEMIS2002 Construction Emissions Summary lPeunds oer Dav) Year 2005 Totals Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Bld Const 8 1 66 1 56 8 3 1 WorkerTri s 01 O1 1 7 0.0 Arch Coatin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As haft 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 8 2 66 2 58 5 3 1 SCAOMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 Si mficance No No No No Year 2006 Totals Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Bld Const 8 1 63 3 58 7 2 9 Worker Tri s 0 1 0 1 1 6 0 0 ~ , C , D, T 'J'~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 ~ J Arch Coatin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As halt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 8 2 63 4 60 0 2 9 SCAOMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 Si nificance No No No No Year 2007 Totals Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Bld Const 8 1 60 4 60 8 2 6 Worker Tri s 0 1 0 1 1 5 0 0 Arch Coatin 72 4 0 1 1 5 0 0 As halt 4 1 24 5 34 4 0 8 Total 84 7 85 1 98 1 3 4 SCAOMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 Si mficance Yes No No No Source Lilburn Corp-URBEMIS2002 As indicated in Tables 1 and 1A, construction emissions exceed the SCAOMD thresholds for one of the two criteria air pollutants, NO. during the grading phase and ROG during the bwlding phase, Year 2007 The development of a protect this size is anticipated to exceed threshold levels, however, the construction emissions are short term (approximately 18 months) Once construction is complete, the operational levels are well below SCAOMD thresholds as indicated in Table 2 Since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) and to avoid any potential significant impacts, fugitive dust would be mitigated by implementation of the following measures 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Alr duality Management Distract [SCAOMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, In accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. 2) Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment and fugitive dust generated by egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces, would increase NO, and PM,o levels in the area The following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 8,~, o,r ~5 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on site when appropriate or as soon as feasible: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soli during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch frneboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans Include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, No„ ROG, and PM~o would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council . 13,~,D,T`7~o Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 Operational Emissions City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 The proposed protect would be developed in accordance with the City's standards Air emissions would most likely come from vehicles traveling to and from the protect site Although a variety of church ministries occur every day of the week, the most intense use of the property occurs during Sunday morning worship services between 8 00 a m and 1200pm The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS2002 model All default values were used for the analysis A Daily Tnp Rate (ADT) of 911 trip per 1,000 square feet was used in the analysis and is considered a worse case scenario as all church services are anticipated to occur on Sunday mornings between 8 00 a m and 12 00 p m In addition, these emissions are based on the estimated winter season when heaters (bwlding space) would be used more frequently causing an increase to the emissions generated on the site Emissions associated with these vehicle taps are listed in Table 2 Table 2 URBEMIS 2002 Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Area Source 0 5 0 6 0 3 0 0 O erational Emissions 4 4 7 6 53 3 0 3 Total 4 9 8 2 53 6 0 3 SCAOMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 Si mficance No No No No Source Ldburn Corp-URBEMIS2002 In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in sigmficant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would ali be cumulatively sigmficant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant level The following mrtigation measures shall be implemented 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) The protect would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant as indicated in Table 2 Furthermore, as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmficant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately ~j,L°,t~~.Z~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 adopted by the City Council The prolect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated e) Typically, the use proposed does not create objectionable odors No adverse Impacts are anticipated Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Faleraially Sipruficant Les, man swantan. an MNganon Less rnan SignifitaM No I atl IMO rated I an 1 acl 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the prolect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species Identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identrfied in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () (~) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () ('~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments• a) Currently the 8 86-acre site is developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, baseball field, and 241 paved parking stalls The proposed prolect Is the construction of a two-story 76,019 square foot worship facility and a 101-stall parking structure The prolect site is located in an area developed with residential (single-family dwelling units) uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction and the Installation of infrastructure According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wilt not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that ~~ C3.C,'D,~'78 • Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site Therefore, no impact on these resources would occur d) Development of the area has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past Residential developments surround the protect site as well as east of Haven Avenue and north of Vista Grove Street The surrounding areas would not serve as a wildlife corridor, thus no impact is expected C~ e) An arborist surveyed the physiological and structural condition of the all trees affected by the proposed sanctuary The proposed sanctuary will affect 138 trees that, based upon then mature size, qualify as Heritage Trees under the City's Tree Ordinance An arborist report was prepared in April 2005, by Cy Cariberg (ASCA Registered Consulting Arbonst #405 and ISA Certified Arbonst #WE 575A) Only one tree, an Aleppo pine, was found to be unhealthy Of the 138 existing trees affected by the proposed sanctuary, 16 trees will be relocated, and 122 trees are proposed for removal The applicant is proposing to install 95 trees, which will be comprised of 3 species (London Plane, Strawberry and Sweetgum) All species will be a 24-inch box size and will complement the existing plant palette The entire 8 8 acre protect site requires a total of 255 trees, based upon the Development Codes ratios for parking stalls and lineal feet of building wall plane The entire protect site will have a total of 308 trees (197 existing, 95 new trees, 16 relocated), which is a surplus of 53 trees Since the protect site will exceed the required tree ratios, the proposed removal of 122 trees is consistent with the original Master Plan with regard to required landscape and tree ratios Impacts are anticipated to be less-than-significant with the approval of the tree removal application, installation of the 95 new trees, and the relocation of 16 trees f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur Leu ma, Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'a""""Y a°rurcem s'0"'"`~"' nn Mro°euon ~"°" si°r.flcem No 1 p Into etl I ct I ecl 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries P~,c , ~, z'19 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Comments: • a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Clty to establish Its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. . • Propose mitigation measures and recommend considerations of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, Important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate California Environmental duality Act (CEQA) guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the Inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original Illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Wdh implementation of the recommended mitigation measures impacts to archeological resources are not antiapated c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvwm, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also . provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (~.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation B,c,9,Z8D monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. With Implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, impacts to paleontological resources are not anticipated Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence Is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that If human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations Is required for all development, no mitigation Is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated l•sa 7n•" Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'e""a'Y S,pnficent so"'H°°"' Rh M,HO•HM '"~" $,pnlHCent No I Inco 2fed 1 I act 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, Including the risk of loss, In1ury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O (/) ( ) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction Iv) Landslldes~ () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoll~ () (/) () ( ) ~tCiVtZ O~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Then Lesa Issues and Su iaortin Information Sources { g Fotan"ally Significant s'q"'"`a"' ith M,opa4on man Sipnifirant Np I act Inco retea I ed I act c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (~) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (~) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 2 miles south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles north These faults are both capable of producing a moment magnitude (Mw) 6 0 - 7 0 earthquake, respectively Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„. 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 17 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking and fault rupture The applicant will be required to conform to the Uniform Building Code to ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant According to the General Plan FEIR, there are three types of ground failure that could occur within the City liquefaction, differential compaction, and subsidence Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subtect to ground shaking during an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface Based on ground water depths within the area (an average of 400 to 500 feet below ground surface), the potential for liquefaction within the protect area is unlikely In addition, Figure 5 1-2 of the General Plan FEIR identifies only a few isolated areas in the City where liquefaction could occur These areas are located in the southwest portion of the City near Red Hill The proposed protect is not within this area Drfferential compaction is the term used to describe areas prone to different rates of surface settling, with or without seismic shaking, which are underlain by sediments that differ laterally in composition or degree of existing compaction The General Plan FEIR identified the former marsh areas of Red Hill as the only area within the City limits that is likely subtect to this potential hazard The protect site is not within this area According to the General Plan FEIR, the only portions of the City that are subtect to potential landslides or slope failure are in the northwest comer of the City and the foothills north of the City limits These areas have some slopes steeper than 25 percent, and include Red Hill, the bluffs along upper Cucamonga Creek, and the foothills at the north edge of the City The possibility of a landslide in one of the canyons resulting in a damaging mudflow is remote because thick soils have not accumulated in the canyons • ~,c,1~,z.~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 15 The protect site is not sublect to landslides or mudflows as it occurs within the southern portion of the City, in an area that is relatively flat and developed with urban uses No impact is anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is sublect to strong Santa Ana wind considerations during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpilmg, and/or movement of on-site soils Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels t) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RWoCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWCCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) militates that subsidence is generally assocated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Sod types onsite consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, mcluding the protect site, is located on alluvial sod deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These sods typically have slopes that range from 2 to 9 percent and have a slow runoff No adverse impacts are anticipated e) Currently the protect site is developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, baseball field, and 241 paved parking stalls The proposed worship center will use the existing septic tank system, therefore, no impact is anticpated Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 ~°ss mar. ~~ Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g an°""~'Y Siorunc°m s'°N~~' rcn ALtq°oon m°" soniec°m No I en loco re~ea ~ °n I n 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the prolect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) envvonment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident considerations involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result m a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working m the prolect area g) Impav implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () (/) ( ) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wddlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other m the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste wdl reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other m the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi- Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 17 • or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-signif scant c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 1/2 mile of the nearest existing (Chaffey Community College and Hermosa Elementary) or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors The protect site is not located within 1/4 mile of a school site No impact is anticipated d) The protect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately five miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and ~s offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every 2 years, mcludes pollees and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster Access to the site ~s by Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street No impact is anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-dnven fire in the . Urban W ildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City, according to the Fire Distract Strategic Pian 2000-2005 According to General Plan Exhibit V-7, the protect site is located within a fire hazard area However, this impact is considered less-than-significant as the protect site and surrounding land uses are developed 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste () (/) () ( ) discharge regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or mtertere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () (/) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or rroer, in a manner which would result m substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () (/) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result m flooding on- or off-site 8,~. D,z 85 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) which would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the fatlure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments• a) Water service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distract (CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to existing water systems The proposed protect will tie into an existing septic system The State of California is authonzed to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industnal activity, regwnng a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SW RCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit regwres all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would speafy Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment regwres a NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are regwred to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the protects construction contractor will be requved to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a WOMP for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an • ~ ,C, V 1 1 v `~F' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 19 on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be regwred to control additional storm water effluent Construction Achwbes 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the City's Building Official for approval, a SWPPP specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities, from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and Implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall Include the following measures at a mlimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods as experienced in southern California, and b) An Inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Constructron Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WOMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Roof Runoff Controls: Pollutants picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins. bc,~,z8~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 8) Efficient Irrigation: Irrigation systems shall include features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines. The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water regwrements. Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surtace filtration. 9) Storm Dram Signage: All storm drain inlets and catch basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream " Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained 10) Trash Storage Areas: The trash storage areas will be paved with an impervious surtace to mitigate spills. The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash. The container floor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure. Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure. Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers. In addition, storm water runoff from adJoining roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins The CVWD has adopted a Master Plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will regwre the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface A s noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facihbes No impact is anticipated c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwldmg and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwldmg and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result m flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated 1..J e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwldmg and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows During the neighborhood meetings, ~,C D,T $$ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 21 residents on Vrvienda Street raised concerns that the existing 1-foot wide by 1 1/2 foot deep drainage culvert near the southwestern corner of the property is inadequate to handle the present and future runoff generated by the proposed sanctuary, parking structure and new grade level parking stalls Resident's sled repeated historical observations of the water breaking out of the culvert and draining across private yards In to response to these concerns, the civil engineer for the protect reviewed the onginai drainage report for the Master Plan and performed a drainage analysis The civil engineer for this protect concluded that with on-site 48-inch to 60-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) functioning as retention basins, the present drainage channels and culverts are adequate to handle the sites tributary area of 6 4 acres The 48-inch to 60-inch diameter RCP will ensure that flows to the culvert are not increased beyond capacity Hillside Community Church has modified its present landscape and maintenance program to include regular cleaning of the culvert in order to ensure adequate drainage The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff The Building Official and City Engineer must approve a Grading and Drainage Plan prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site wdl not result m flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre and therefore, is regwred to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 11) Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WOMP, including a project description and Identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (I.e. a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood-protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site ~s not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticpated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City and spreading grounds both within and north of the City au m~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources Mentlelly igniflcant ipnificant Hh MNgaoon an 19Nflcant o C ne0 ta~etl n 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established communrty~ O O O (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, speafic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan O O O (~) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The protect site is located within the Very Low Residential zone and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, and east The protect includes the development of a 77,019 square foot worship facility and 101-stall parking structure The protect would not conflict with any environmental plans or policies upon approval of the Development Review The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Very Low Residential The property is already developed with a church, including a 7,700 square foot multi purpose bwlding (family center), modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, baseball fields, and 241 paved parking stalls The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located wdhm any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan Pj,C, D,-Lq~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Issues and Supporting Information Sources o,a""a"Y ,°nihcant n s Tnan 1po1hCe0' nh MN°ation nco retea ess igmhcant an o n 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result m the loss of availability of a known mineral O O O (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of avadabihty of a locally important O O (~) ( ) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources ;,~d~;,; asa man °M"hM~°;,an °r.eaa a r¢o taa 11. NOISE Would the protect result rn a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels m () () (~) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () (~) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise O O O (~) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase m O (~) U ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 mtles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vianity of a prroate austnp, O O O (~) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at bwld-out During the neighborhood meetings for the . proposed protect, several residents cited repeated high levels of noise from cheering at sports events held at the south ball field A 6-foot high wall is proposed along the south g,c, D, s q i Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 property line in order to mitigate existing sound levels and prevent headlight glare from the ball field parking A noise study was prepared in February 2005, by an acoustical engineer, McKay Conant Brook The acoustical engineer concluded that a 6-foot high masonry wall will provde 10 decibel reduction for the residents whose rear yards share the south boundary of Hillside Community Church Subjectively, a 10 decibel reduction equates to a 50 percent reduction in loudness at the resident's homes as perceived by the listener A 6-foot wall will not provide any sound attenuation at the second story windows for the houses at the south property line Hillside Community Church is proposing to utilize single-level bleachers, thereby, reducing the height potential of spectators and ultimately, the sound levels Hillside Community Church plans on maintaining its present level of sports activity, and does not plan on augmenting its present level of ball field sports as a result of the proposed sanctuary The impact is considered less-than-significant b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations c) Currently the 8 86 acre site is developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday school classrooms, activity pavilion, baseball field, and 241 paved parking stalls The proposed protect is the construction of a two-story 76,019 square foot worship facility and a 101-stall parkrng structure Hillside Community Church has church services on Sundays between the hours of 8 30 a m and 12 00 p m The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase daily traffic, hence, are not anticipated to significantly increase the ambient noise levels within the wcmity of the protect However, the applicant is proposing a wall (per City Standards) on the south property line, adjacent to the baseball field to alleviate any potential impacts to adjacent residential homes No impacts to ambient • noise levels are anticipated d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construchon phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The followrng measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified In Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notHy the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The wall at the south property Ime shall be constructed as early as possible The preceding mitigation measures wilt reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measure shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, it heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan, and there are no public airports within 2 miles of the site The protect site is located approximately 6 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is antiapated • Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g mem,a~lr Ignincent m~ Ipnihcant im M,hpehon an vnifleant o ect nco led n 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indvectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () ('~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site wdl be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Impacts to population and housing are not anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impacts are anticipated c) Currently the site is developed with a 7,700 square foot worship center, modular Sunday School classrooms, Activity Pavilion, baseball field, and 241 paved parking stalls The proposed protect is the construction of a two-story 76,019 square foot worship faality and 101-stall parking structure The protect will not displace residences, therefore, no impacts will occur 13,C, D, T 93 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g o,anaafir 9nficant ass man °""ica"' nh Mm9aoon ass an i°niGCant o en nco retea eC act 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result rn substantial adverse physical rmpacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcatly altered governmental facilities, the constructron of whrch could cause srgnr/~cant environmental rmpacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectrves for any of the public servrces a) Fue protections U O O (`~) b) Police protecban~ O O O (~) () () (~) c) Schools () O O (~) d) Parks O e) Other public facihties~ O O O (~) Comments: a) Fire Protection -The Insurance servrces Office Inc , (ISO) collects information on a community's public fire protection and analyzes the data using their Fve Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS) They then assign a Public Protection Ciassrficatron (PPC) on a scale from one to ten Class one represents the best public protection, and Class ten indicates less than the minimum recognized protection Each Frre District is evaluated every fwe years and rs reported to insurance companies as a factor in setting the premiums they charge for property insurance, the better the communitys PPC grade, the lower the premwms for property insurance According to the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Construction Services, the City rs rated a Class Three According to the ISO, a class three rating in California is rn the upper 15 percent of the enure state Fire Station No 175, located approximately 2 miles southeast, serves the protect site located north of Banyan Street and west of Milliken Avenue The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District provides fire protection and emergency medical response servrces This site, designated residential is intended for a worship facility and parking structure The protect will not regwre the constructron of any new fire protection facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of fire protection service, whrch could cause the need to construct new faalrties Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Police protection -The City of Ranch Cucamonga contracts with the San Bernardino County Shenff's Department (SBSD) and currently has 96 uniformed officers assigned to the City The average response trine to an emergency call for service rs approximately four minutes, response times are evaluated on a monthly basis The Sheriff's Department reviews response times annually and the ratio of officers to the City's population annually to determine rf more officers are needed to keep the response time below fwe minutes Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled, as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled No impact is anticipated c) Schools -The site is in a developed area currently served by the Alta Loma School District and the Chatfey Joint Union High School District The protect will be regwred to • C'~r~,~,Tq~l Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of Bwlding Permits The proposed protect would not have an impact on schools d) Parks -The site is in a developed area, with park services provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is Heritage Park located approximately 2 miles southwest of the protect site The protect will not regwre the construction of any new park faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of park service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts to park services will occur e) Public facilities -The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site ism a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline m the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga wdl increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a sigmftcant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g otBntl81y pNficeM men °"~Ce"` M MNpe°on nw ted esv °" pNficant ° 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical detenoration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational faalities or () () () (~) regwre the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) Recreational Facilities -The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 2 miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will requue the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above ~~ C~ D, T q5 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 ass man Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g ma"ne~ir ipnilicant °"fi`a"` rth MiL°allon an 9n~hcant o an ncn rated an act 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase m traffic which is substantial in O O (~) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change m air traffic patterns, including O O O (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (~) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (~) g) Conflict with adopted pollees, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) The proposed protect includes the construction of a two-story 76,019 square foot worship facility and 101-stall parking structure Based on the proposed use, the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) associates a trip rate of 9 11 taps per day per 1,000 square feet The ITE analyzed a 64,459 square foot worship facility which includes a 46,459 square foot worship facility pad and a 20,000 square foot parking structure (property graded/disturbed) Based on this trip rate, the proposed protect will generate 587 trips per day However, church services will be held on Sunday between the hours of 8 30 a m to 12 00 p m Haven Avenue provides pnmary access to the site and secondary access will be provided via Vista Grove Street The protect proponent will be regwred to construct the necessary street improvements and as contained in the conditions of approval for the protect, pay Traffic Impact Fees as established by the City Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect Aless-than-significant impact is anticipated b) The protect will generate 49 two-way peak hour trips (non-worship times, Monday through Friday), which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land use during Monday through Friday, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for regwring a traffic impact analysis The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that the proposed sanctuary will generate 692 two-way peak hour trips on Sundays Although 692 two-way peak hours trips exceeds the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for regwring a traffic impact analysis, the 692 two-way peak hour trip generation I3, C, ~, Z qCv Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 29 . factor wdl occur on off peak traffic hours on Sunday mornings The Congestion Management Plan is concerned with alleviating traffic during the peak a m and p m commuting hours that occur during weekdays The protect is in an area that is developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is located approximately 6 mtles northwest of Ontario Airport, offset north of the flight path The development would not be dangerous to the site occupant or Ontario International Airport aircraft No impact is anticipated d) Access to the site is from Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street The access via Haven Avenue is 40 feet wide and the access at Vista Grove Street is 50 feet wide The areas along Haven Avenue are currently developed with an equestrian trail, sidewalks and trees as well as landscaping throughout the frontage street The lines of sight for vehicles traveling either north or south on Haven Avenue are clear and provide unabated views to oncoming cars or pedestrians No sharp curves or dangerous intersections are associated with the protect The driveways would prowde adequate space for emergency access According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code parking associated with the protect should be approximately 374 spaces, the protect proponent has provided a sufficient number of spaces with 547 The applicant has also proposed to continue providing a shuttle service for parishioners from Chaffey College (parking lot) to alleviate traffic congestion and parking on residential streets The Chaffey College site provides an additional 400 parking stalls No impacts associated with safety hazards or inadequate emergency access or parking is anticipated with the proposed protect e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and wtll therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The proposed sanctuary has worship floor area of 13,125 square feet and has the capaaty to seat 1,400 The Development Code has two parking mhos for churches 1 stall per 35 square feet of seating area within the main auditorium, or one stall per 4 fixed seats The proposed sanctuary has been designed without fixed seats, hence the one stall per 35 square feet of area parking formula was utilized to calculate the requued amount of parking. The sanctuary will regwre a total of 375 parking stalls at one stall per 35 square feet of area The church presently has 251 paved stalls on the property The proposed sanctuary and site design includes the installation of 40 additional paved stalls, a 101 stall bi-level parking structure, and 155 stalls on the lower ball field The ball field parking arrangement was approved with the original Conditional Use Permit 82-29. The protect will have a total of 547 on-site parking stalls, thereby, exceeding the requved number of parking stalls for churches as required by the Development Code (392 paved stalls plus 155 ball field stalls) The parking regwrements are illustrated below in Table 1 below New Sanctuary Parking ratio and regwred Location and number of number of stalls stalls 13,125 sq ft Parking ratio 1/35 sq ft Onsite Parking worship area Requued parking 375 a) Paved stalls 291 b) Structure 101 c) Ball field parking 155 Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 1,400 seats' I Parking ratio 1/4 fixed seats' Recurred oarkina 350 Total paved onsite stal + b) 392 Offsite Parkmc d) Chaffey College Lot 400+ Parkino Totals TotalOnsite 547 Grand Total (onsite + Chaffe 947 • Table 1 'Hillside Community Church Sanctuary does not have fixed seats The 1 per 4 fixed seats calculation is provided for reference only There were a total of four neighborhood meetings conducted for the proposed new sanctuary During the neighborhood meetings, several residents noted that Hillside Community Church, with its present 7,770 square foot worship center, has attendees parking on the local neighborhood streets every Sunday Residents expressed concern that if the present parking lot is inadequate, then the construction of a new sanctuary would only intensify the weekly occurrence of attendees parking on the local neighborhood streets In response to the residents concerns, planning staff and WLC, City staff and the protect architects for Hillside Community Church, conducted parking count surveys of cars parked on Sunday mornings Planning staff and WLC Architects found that at peak hour (second service on Sunday morning), the existing lot at Hillside was full (251 stalls), and 113 cars were parked on the nearby streets, and 58 cars were parked at the off-site lot leased by the church at Chaffey College The total number of vehicles for attendees at Htllside for a Sunday morning was 422 In response to the parking surveys, Hillside Community Church augmented its existing off-site parking lot and shuttle service at Chaffey College Hillside Community Church presently operates 4 shuttle buses, each with a capacty of 36 persons If user demand warrants, the church will purchase and operate a 5th shuttle bus Each shuttle bus makes cone-way trip from the church to parking area at Chaffey College every 8-10 minutes The buses operate every Sunday from 7 45 a m to 12 30 p m Hillside Community Church and has secured a 5 year lease (with option for 5 year renewal) with Chaffey College for parking at Parking Area 18 at Chaffey College Parking Area 18 has the capacity for 400 plus vehicles With the 547 stalls at Hillside Community Church, the total available parking stalls (on-site and off-site) is 947 (Table 1) The Planning staff researched what present vehicle occupancy rates are for parishioners who live m and attend church m communities that are very automobile-oriented The research indicates an average vehicle occupancy rate of 2 0 to 2 5 persons Using the most intensive vehicle occupancy rate of 2 0, the proposed 1,400 person sanctuary would necessitate 750 stalls With 947 total avaiable stalls (547 on-site and 400 at Chaffey College), this allows for a vehicle occupancy rate of 1 5, and equates to a parking ratio of one stall per 14 square feet of worship area, more than double the Development Codes regwrement and more intense than the most restrictive municipalities surveyed (Table 2) Ingress and egress to the auxiliary parking lot at Chaffey College will be from Haven Avenue, thereby, avoiding the pollution and noise impacts of shuttle buses to residents that Irve off Wilson Avenue Since the neighborhood meetings, Hillside Community Church has strengthened its parking ministry team that provides attendants at local streets and informs attendees to utilize either the ~3, ~,p,.zq~ Initial Study for nac~nna-ot o1 s City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 on-site parking lot or the off-site lot at Chaffey College The parking lot attendants monitor the available parking stalls and direct traffic accordingly The residents also expressed concern over the feasibility of the ball field parking When the original Conditional Use Permit (Conditional Use Permit 82-29) was approved, the Master Site Plan included the parking of automobiles on the ball fields Hillside Community Church had RMA Group (Geotechnical Engineers) review the original soils compaction reports by Geosolls The compaction report indicates that the soils were compacted to 90 percent of their maximum dry density The evaluation by the RMA Group of the compaction report indicates that the ball fields on the lower pad areas will be able to bear the weight of vehicles The evaluation by RMA Group further states that vehicles could leave ruts if the ground Is saturated, but that ruts could be corrected by recompaction The Hillside Community church's parking ministry team will identify drive aisles on the ball field with orange cones and parking stalls delineated by flags mounted on poles that are inserted into the turf The Planning staff has conducted surveys of other municipalities parking ratios for churches The findings of the surveys indicate that in most cases the City of Rancho Cucamonga's parking requirements for churches are similar In a few municipalities, parking requirements for churches are more intensive than the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking requirements for churches for other municipalities are summarized In Table 2 City Parking Ratio Notes Rancho Cucamonga 1 35 sq ft or 1 4 fixed seats Chino 1 75 sq ft or 1 3 fixed seats Chino Hills 1 25 sq ft or 1 3 fixed seats Fullerton 1 21 sq ft or 1 3 fixed seats Pomona 1 35 sq ft or 1 3 fixed seats ' Riverside 1 30 sq ft or 1 4 fixed seats Table 2 ~ Ciry hes et least one mega church Although no precise definition of a mega church could be located, most sources place a congregational requirement of at least 2,000 people. Cities surveyed that have ewsting mega churches apply the same parking ra4os indicated above g) The protect design Includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PptentlellY Less Then 9 r m Then Sigrvfcam gm pe eh M,tlgetlon Sigrefipent No Inpect IncorporeteE Impact bryett 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facitities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Regwre or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted O O O (~) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) Impacts to Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) are not anticipated as existing operations are on a septic system The proposed 77,019 square foot Worship Center will tie into this system No impact is anticipated b) The District's water sources include groundwater, surface (Canyon) water, and imported water There are currently a total of 23 groundwater wells (17 in the Cucamonga Basin and 6 in the Chino Basin) The District's total capacity of pumped groundwater production from both basins is 32,121 gpm (approximately 51,800 acre-feet/year) Capital improvement funds are budgeted annually to recondition and rehabilitate wells as needed Three water treatment facilities treat local surface water and imported water The total treatment capacity of all three plants is 57 5 MGD with an additional 18 MGD expected to be on-line in mid-2003 These plants currently provide treatment for an average of 32 MGD The distribution system has approximately 230 miles of primary distribution lines Pipelines include cement mortar lined and wrapped steel pipe and cement mortar coated steel pipe (Cucamonga County Water District lAFCO Sphere/Service Review Report, September, 2002) The impact to the District's water distribution system is not anticipated, as the protect site is currently provided with this service :8, ~, ~~ T loo Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 Impacts to wastewater treatment facilities are not anticipated as the proposed protect will be on a septic tank system c) All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticpated e) Impacts to wastewater treatment facilities are not anticipated as the proposed protect will be on a septic tank system Solid waste collection and disposal services are currently supplied by the City's contracted hauler and transported to the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill in the City of Rialto San Bernardino County of Public Works, Waste System Dmsion operates the landfill According to the General Plan FEIR, the City generates approximately 270 tons of solid waste per day The FEIR indicates that the City would generate an increase of approximately 236 tons per day by 2020, which accounts for an 67 percent increase over the existing generated solid waste The current permitted capacity of the Mid-Valley Landfill is estimated to the year 2035 The San Bernardino County Department of Public Works, Waste System Division does not foresee any significant impacts resulting from protected growth and solid waste generation since the countywide waste management system is planned for expansions to meet the growing demands within the County's service area The proposed protect will not impact waste disposal services or landfill capacities g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated •~ ~ C,'D, T I ~ I Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotanaallY Lass Than Siprvficant my, f d N Sprvficant M1h Miapa0IX1 can Sipn o Inpad Incoryaatetl Irtpact Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually O O O (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects which will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be regwred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred c) The proposed development would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly Adding pollutants to an area where air quality is a problem will have an affect on achieving goals, however, all pollutant levels are at a point below ICt~tS ~~a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01019 Page 35 thresholds set to avoid adverse health effects associated with the pollutants Air quality conditions with the protect will not subject humans to adverse health effects EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review ~n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) • General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) • Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), May 2, 2005, Dan Guerra & Associates • URBEMIS2002 Air Quality Model Results, May 23, 2005, Lilbum Corporation • Arborist Report, April 12, 2005, Cy Carlberg Consulting . Photometric Analysis, WLC, 2005 • Acoustical Study, McKay Conant and Brook, February 16, 2005 • Letter from RMA Group, Geotechnical Engineers, March 25, 2005 ~,C,D,T1o~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01019 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION • I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ! Date ~ d Q~ Pnnt Name and Title ,62~ N PAY./~ , pl?l~~~T' ~gN/t4e~2 UGL iy1LH)'I~~ • rv ~ ~ ~ S 1U`~ • ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review in accordance with the Call/ornia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019 Public Review Period Closes: July 27, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant• Hillside Community Church Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the southwest corner of Haven and Vista Grove Street APN 1074-271-01 Project Description: -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a two-story 76,019 square foot worship center and 101-stall parking structure center on 8 86 acres of land m the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven and Vista Grove Street -APN 1074-271-01 Related files Pre Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-03, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 FINDING This is to adwse that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the prolect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negatwe Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the prolect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. July 27. 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By ~,C,~,S lo`~ RESOLUTION NO 05-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 76,019 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER AND A 101 STALL PARKING STRUCTURE ON 8 86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 to 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 1074-271-01 A Recitals 1 Hillside Community Church filed an application for approval of DRC2004-01019, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Rewew request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on July 27, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the development of a sanctuary bwlding totaling 76,019 square feet and a 101 stall, bi-level parking structure on 8.86 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units, the property to the south is developed with future single-family dwelling units, the property to the east, across Haven Avenue, is developed with asingle-family dwelling units, and the property to the west is developed with single-family dwelling units, and c The church site was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29, with the exception of the architectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with a Master Plan and the issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Conditional Use Permit 88-10 also included the master plan for the church In 1994, the church completed its first permanent bwlding, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose bwlding that is presently used for worship services, and ~~C~ Q,T 1171.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 2 d The applicant is proposing to construct a 76,019 square foot worship center, which includes administrative offices, classrooms, and a 13,125 square foot sanctuary The proposed sanctuary is in substantial compliance with the approved master plan (Conditional Use Permit 88-10) The proposed 1,400-seat sanctuary is actually smaller than the 1,500-seat sanctuary that was ongmally approved The current proposal, as ail previously approved proposals, includes the use of the lower (south) ball field for parking This ball field was constructed and compacted to accommodate vehicles The two portable buildings that function as Sunday school classrooms will be removed with the construction of the new sanctuary Also proposed is a brlevel parking structure that will provide 101 parking stalls The parking structure has been designed to maximize the use of the grades on the site, with the first level being underground and bwlt into an existing slope The second level will take access from the north parking lot The parking structure has been designed to blend with the proposed sanctuary and the existing Family Center buildings, utilizing a river rock base on the south and west elevations Landscape slopes buttressed by a keystone retaining wall surround the three exposed sides (west, south, and east elevations) of the parking structure e The applicant conducted four neighborhood meetings to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback Residents from the surrounding area attended the meetings and provided design suggestions that improved the protect and minimized the impact of the sanctuary building As result of the neighborhood meetings, the applicant made changes to the sanctuary height, bwldmg pad elevation, and modified the prolect to include a bi-level parking structure and the installation of the 6-foot high sound wall at the south property Ime, and f The sanctuary will have a seating capacity of 1,400 persons In 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10 was approved, which included a master plan fora 1,500-person sanctuary in the same location as the 1,400-person sanctuary, and g The protect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and h The prolect regwres 375 parking stalls, per the requirements of the Development for churches The prolect has been design with 392 paved stalls, 155 ball field stalls, and a satellite parking lot at Chaffey College with shuttle services to the church that provides an additional 400 stalls The total amount of parking stalls available on-site is 547 In addition, the church has a lease with Chaffey College to use their parking lots, via shuttle service, for an additional parking capacity of 400 spaces The overall amount of parking stalls available (on-site plus satellite lot at Chaffey College) is 947 stalls, and i A photometric study was completed to ensure that the upper level of the parking structure and the expansion of the existing parking lot would not cause glare on the single-family dwelling units located west and south of the church property The parking structure is located 60 feet east of the west property line that separates the church and the single-family residences The parking structure will generate azero-foot candle illummat~on at the shared property line, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles The expansion of the grade level parking lot at the south property line will result in a maximum of 20-foot candle illumination on the residential properties south of the parking lot, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles, and 13, ~ ,~ , z l0`1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 3 t The protect has been designed with reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) that will function as retention basins m order to ensure that the on-site storm drain system is adequate and will not exceed the capacity of the existing culvert at the southwest corner of the property, and k The protect has been designed with a 101-stall, bi-level parking structure that has been designed to maximize the use of the grades on the site, with the first level being underground and built into an existing slope, thereby blending into to the existing topography and minimizing the visual impact; and I The sanctuary design has been designed to blend with the existing multi-purpose budding, utilizing rock cobble Further, the sanctuary has been designed to minimize the visual impact on the residents to the north by being designed with a depressed pad elevation that regwres 13 feet of excavation and a gable roof element that is common m residential neighborhoods. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code, and b That the proposed design is m accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval ~j,C,~,T ldg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH . July 27, 2005 Page 4 c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission fords as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 is hereby approved for the removal of 122 trees for the development of the worship center parking lot and parking structure Per the arbonst report on file with the Planning Department, 16 trees shall be transplanted elsewhere on-site Ninety-five new trees shall be planted, comprised of 3 speces (London . Plane, Strawberry, and Sweetgum) All new tree species shall be 24-inch box size. The Tree Removal Permit shall be valid for 90 days from the date of Bwldmg Permit issuance The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall include an exhibit mdicatmg the 122 trees to be removed and the 16 trees to be relocated 2) All improvements mcludmg, but not limited to, the sanctuary, the parking lot, the parking structure, and landscaping shall be completed m one phase Phasing of the improvements is not permitted 3) The project shall be developed in accordance with plans approved by the Design Review Committee on May 31, 2005, on file with the Planning Department 4) All outdoor activities that involve spectator cheering and/or the use of amplified sound systems mcludmg, but not limited to, sports activities, concerts, movies, and recreational games, shall not commence pnorto 7 a m and shall terminate by 10 p m. Outdoor overnight campouts are permitted, provided that no amplified sound dunng the hours of 10 p m to 7 a.m and that the activity is within the acoustical regwrements of the Development Code during the hours of 10 p m to 7 a m 5) At the parking structure, climbing canes shall be planted at the base of the concrete columns at the top of the landscape slopes Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Boston Ivy), or alternative species approved by the Planning Department dunng plan check, shall be used PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 5 6) Ball field parking shall be utilized commencing with the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary Ball field parking shall be managed in accordance with the report on file with the Planning Department dated April 7, 2005, that calls for the use of cones, flags, and parking lot attendants 7) For evening services using the ball field parking, the church shall provide sufficient number of parking lot attendants with flashlights to safely direct traffic. 8) A 6-foot high sound wall shall be constructed along the entire south property line in order to mitigate sound from the ball fields. The sound wall shall be constructed in accordance with specifications outlined by acoustical consultants McKay Conant and Brook dated February 16, 2005 The plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the sound wall and all necessary details and cross-sections 9) Single-tier bleachers shall be utilized at the south ball fields for noise attenuation purposes. Single-tier bleachers shall be installed pnor to the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary. 10) All parking lot fixtures shall not exceed 15 feet m height and shall be compatible with the existing parking lot fixtures The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval durng plan check. 11) A photometric diagram shall be submitted during plan check demonstrating that dlummation levels from the project site are consistent with approved plans on file with the Planning Department Budding & Safety Department 1) The maximum discharge for the existing culvert at the southwest corner of the property shall be 13 7 cubic feet per second (CFS) A Final Drainage Study determining the precise size of the underground pipes for retention purposes shall be provided during plan check to the satisfaction of the Bwldmg and Safety plan check engineer. Engineenng Department 1) Install missing street improvements, it any, along Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Street Improvements include, but are not limited to, sidewalk, street trees, community trail, dnve approaches, access ramps, and curbside drain outlets 2) On Viwenda Street, upgrade curbside drain outlet as required The Drainage Study for the on-site retention facilities shall be reviewed by . City Engineer as well as Bwldmg and Safety prior to Grading Permit issuance '(~j~C,~,T 110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 6 3) Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (W QMP) on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check 4) Do not install concrete walkway across the Community Trail Environmental Mitigation Av Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distract [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 5) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 6) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied . either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 j1j,C,D,T111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 7 9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule actvities to mirnmize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a mm~mum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will ~~ C , D, T' 11 0~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 8 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions o1 approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW OCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with p~,c, ~, z i ~ 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 9 vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm W ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actvities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a mmxmum• a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) Durng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the WOMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, ~ , C, D, Z I I'} PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH . July 27, 2005 Page 10 including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins 8) Effiaent Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or Imes. The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water regwrements Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. 9) Storm Drain Signage Ali storm dram inlets and catch basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream " Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained 10) Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills. The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor • will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adtoimng roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein 11) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ~j,C,D,T IIS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 . Page 11 Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Offical If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The wall at the south property line shall be constructed as early as possible 4) Haul truck delroeries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6'30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 datly trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby • certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the '~, C,1~, T I I C.p PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 12 Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • ~~ ~~'D,= ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01019, VARIANCE DRC2005-00321, VARIANCE DRC2005-00322, AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All momtonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 \~ g,c,D,= 118 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2004-01019, DRC2005-00321, DRC2005-00322, AND DRC2005-00323 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Diwsion shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances regwnng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for momtonng the mitigation activties at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an mdiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits 'Fj~G,D,T l (~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2004-01019. DRC2005-00321, DRC2005-00322. AND DRC2005-00323 Applicant: Hillside Community Church Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: June 7, 2005 d H -~ Q G •. .. .~ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air construction Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Marier (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept CP C Durng A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to construction reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wmd CP C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City venfication 1 of 9 • .. .. .. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff Ali paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1106 ~ tl All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 _ Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall H include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible: !U Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C Z4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering pracUCes 2 of 9 ~ •- -. .. . • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C Dunng A 4 by the Cary if stlt is carried over to adfacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e., BO C Dunng q 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a mirnmum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans A/C 4 alternatroe fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 requred to incorporate high-efficiencyflow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of plans A/C 214 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. Cultural Resource's ~ ~,., ' s~~.~f ~9„~,~y~; ,~~ ~ ~~u~~`:' ~` " ~w~++vv~~'~~''~..u~~~~,Te~T~,5,-¢ ; ~ ~ ~~ ~~r ~~,axK''z~ r t"' "jh k + , ~~M' a~'g .~~~ ,~' l ~~°' ~ ~ ~ ~~.~rs~x~s~~,~ X !e d 5 §i ~xn.~; ~,. ~~ ~ ' dXro ~"C~-~ 3^` s^' + o. v a ~9AYe n ,:_. a. : .. n (e ~ i v+~'. `G` k" t34 {~#6:a3?I ~ ~y . ~H+" d=c~~'a° a.ri"~`e fi ro >. Awir, x:?n ~Ga If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of report A~ 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value yU ~ n d r~ 3~9 ... -. • .. • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CP/BO C Rewew of report A/~ 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using then special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Rewew of report A!~ 3/4 archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Rewew of report A~ 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate California Environmental Ouahty Act (CEQA) guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Rewew of report aC 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualtlied paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological momtor, framed and CP B Rewew of report A!D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing acfiwfies • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Rewew of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the momtor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find ( d rr~ U 4 of 9 n d H 9.1 S .. . - .. . • .. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Revew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum ..; L.c` ~ 'qF j~!>,`r+ kL}dC ° 1 ;`JI< '"T~~wv: ff " ^`~y. a Geology,and,Soils, ;(2_;~;:d. r,Y~.~x,~rF~..,~~c~t~~~~`{'?~,~; ` ^ ny- k '~~~"~ r5- 5~ :~~ .~ i 1. ;° ~~ • k ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ `x: r~pM- ` tt idT_{ ri ?e ..~` r c„ ,+. ~>, x'n'+. <v~r. ,:4' f eFaa'#'s N„ tti H. r'SX4 ~ ,.. ~;.yr}"f.', t!C~.`~~~u"J~et;: c. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A q soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions :Hydrology'and•,N/aterOC~ality„~"~~~~~ ~'a"~~a:~,~'~'~R^~~ ,~5 - t ~., { ' ~~~, -~FF - ;' ~~~ee u~~a„~~° ~,, x~,.a;r;,x-„~, Prior to issuance of grading permds, the permd applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 shall submit to Budding Official for approval, a SWPPP specdically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities, from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 9 CA n FI 9J (~ 1..J u .. -. .. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum• a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods as experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C!D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 the W OMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Assoaates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Pians for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 6 of 9 .. - -. .. Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality dewce located at catch basins. Efficient Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water regwrements Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. Storm Dram Signage All storm drain inlets and catch CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream" Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Pondmg will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have hds or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adtoming roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 ti H R: ~9 • .. .. .. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Eliminahon System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bulding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Con struction Permd p ( NOISe r ~2*3~`G;' ...'f+ir.; lf'T }f. `~+ w~L .~.'f Fk(i'.~SYu~ff .~~+)i.]t'F ~~ ax s,. .i ... ., u.. -Hy~ ,.r7YX .{ .n.."5~$~x5°+f`:~,"+ ~~ja ~+ .F'.v'd~w"~s{.` 4~ 4r ~' n~ ~~.. ~ ~~ ~~~~~, M1~ t1 ~^~~, r~~~~~ _ kj r i ~ ~~ ~~~ ~4 'o~'tt' iE "S~ F;~i~Y' ` " :W N ~~''~'~~ `;°'`:~.`:~ak~(Y. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Durin - . irr Y q m - E hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, g construction 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday a Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng q ~ standards specified in Development Code Section construction 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The d developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly y noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may ~ be regwred by the Buldng Official Said consultant ~ shall report their findings to the Building Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwiding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actroities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The wall at the south property line shall be constructed CP C/D Review of A/C 3/4 as early as possible plans/Dunng construction 8of9 • .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A q~7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Res orisitile Be~sonr:'~J~ 'fir,: <i` " P., , , ~.~ rT ' ~` ~.»,+*~.- ~.ix~~~mmfl, ~Mo~itorfngFrequeh~y z ~~ r~~~ ~ „.~,,,. y~~liet~iod o Vei;if[catlo .'~ °' 2~~ ~ ~ z q Sar%~~fon~' ~` a ± CDD • Community Development Director or designee A -With Eech New Development , A • On-site Inspection , ~r^ , ~.~ t _ ., ? 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B • Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE • City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D • On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reporls/Studies/Pians) 4 -Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Opera4ng FC -Fire Chief or designee 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation ~! v H s~s COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 76K WORSHIP CENTER APPLICANT: HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET - APN. LOCATION: 1074-271-01 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The Cary may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-60, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code • regulations SC-1-OS Completion Date _/_1- ~~- _/~_ B , c-, ~, T ~ a°I Protect No DRC2004-01019 Completion Date D. E. 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~_/_ 3 of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/~ State Fve Marshal regulations have been complied with Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety Department to show compliance The bwidings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, trngation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not warve compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the Ume of bwlding permd issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the Ctty Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 9 Ail ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Ctty Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwldtng plans Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a bwldtng, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/~_• contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) SC-1-05 2 ~j,C, D,T 1~0 Project No DRC2004-01019 Completion Date 3 Ali parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped F. Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential prolects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the fvst 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees requred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial prolects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5'1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 All pnvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq tt of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 8 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public nght-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage SC-1-O5 _~-~- ~-~- ~~_ ~-~. ~~. ~~ ~~ ~~- ~~- / / ~,,c,~,Z i31 Protect No DRC200d-01019 ComDlahon Date 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~_/_ the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the -/~_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~_/- design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 12 Landscaprng and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ~_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval ~~_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/~- implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $474 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City stall time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_J- of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSRATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~-~- a Site/Plot Plan; b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, i Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and SC-1-OS 4 ~,c,D,~ 13a Protect No DRC2004-01019 Comoletwn Date g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-01019) clearly identified on the outside of all plans • 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/~_ 5 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~_ Building and Safety Department L. Site Development 1 Plans shalt be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be _/~_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other appltcable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and appltcable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protector ~~_ mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demoldion Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits Issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map ~~_ recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits . 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Plannrng Department's public _/_/ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Califomta Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances ~ /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provde compliance with the Califomta Bwldtng Code for required occupancy separations ~~_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/ Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~~_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Cahfomta Budding Code, Ctty Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to J_/ pertorm such work SC-7-OS Bic,~,T t33 Protect No DRC2004-01019 Completion Date 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permds 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) - 52 total feet on Haven Avenue, to Include community trail 2 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards P. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or powerto any building service equipmentwhich is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted bythe City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Sheet Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Slde• walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Islantl Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X X (e,f) Vista Grove X X Vivienda Street (f) Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) access ramp(s), (f) curbside dram outlets -install and/or upgrade Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto / ~ _~~~ -~~- ~~. ~~- ~~- ~~- • _/_/. ~-~- C~ SC-1-OS $r C6 'D, T I '~'~ Protect No DRC2004-01019 Completion Date final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a t ' _/_/_ o any s Office in addition construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer other permits requued c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and _/_/_ interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/~- prolect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City ~_/- Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~~_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the sattsfactton of the Ctty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/~- 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~_ accordance with the Citys street tree program 5 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with ~~_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including drveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred Q. Public Maintenance Areas 1 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~~_ Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue R. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~~_ approval or the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer SC-1-OS Bic~~,T i35 Protect No DRC2004-01019 Completion Date S. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall ram The deposit is fully refundable if P ~-~~ rog be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion at least 50% of all wastes generated dunng construction and demolition are diverted from and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to landfills , the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following F orm Safety the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power nset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell d f _/_J- rom su These areas should be lighte 2 All buildings shall have mammal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with ~-~- direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development U. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within lass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used red t ~~- g empe 40 inches of any locking device, 2 All roof openings giving access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, ~~ or alarmed V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime ~J_ visibility 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be feet in width and of contrasting color to background d t _~~- wo a minimum of three feet in length an n loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department The stencils for this purpose are o FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ITHE FOLLOWING 7 P 0, LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2 P CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SG1-OS ~,,c,~, T )3b ~,,,,,:~; Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District "~ Fire Construction Services Yi STANDARD CONDITIONS April 14, 2005 Hillside Community Church 5354 Haven Avenue DRC2004-01019 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding c If any portion of a facility or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof ~_~ B~~-,fl, z 13~ FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fue sprinklers are installed is 2,875 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system m accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire Distnct review and approval Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fve hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fve spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distrct Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in• 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Bwidings. 3 "All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (see Fire Access). 4. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 5 When bwldings do not meet the regwrements of the 2001 California Bwldmg Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwldmg Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwlding or swte's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bwlding permit must be • obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is regwred to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c. The minimum outside tum radws shall be 46-feet. • acs is 45-feet l d - f d d or cu - e s ws The minimum ra e The mirnmum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driwng surface shall not exceed 12%. i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~. Trees and shrubs planted adtacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a. In bwldings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In bwldings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access 3 B~C,~,z~3`j roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a The gate shall be motorized and slide open horizontally or swing inward b All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of regwred width c. When fully open, the minimum width shall be 20-feet d Gates are not required to be motorized 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogerncs • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • 4 pj l I ~ O ,G,~, • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with mirnmum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department rewews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased oroperty which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to • the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement 5 ~jCJ~tZ ~~ I shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino • To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provde a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a requred pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b. Crosses a property line, or Prowde service to adjacent properties, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fve hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. The agreement shall be submitted to Fve Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections u ~I~,DIz ~'-~~°, 2 All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8. 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5 Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. t~ PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers• All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflectroe pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants' For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6. Fire Alarm System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fue access roadways. 10 Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/mdustnal and multi-family bwldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated dunng periods of darkness When the bwldmg setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- dluminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers wdl be required on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and mdustnal bwldings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 11. Hazardous Materials• Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwldmg or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. ~~c,~,T 1~`~" RESOLUTION NO 05-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2005-00321, A REQUEST TO ALLOW A BUILDING HEIGHT OF 45 FEET WHERE A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 30 FEET IS ALLOW ED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 76,019 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER ON 8 86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 to 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1074-271-01 A Recitals 1. Hillside Community Church fled an application for the issuance of Variance DCR2005-00321, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning i Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows• a The application applies to Development Review DRC2004-01019, a 76,019 square foot worship center located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street; and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units, the property to the south is developed with future single-family dwelling units, the property to the east, across Haven Avenue, is developed with asingle-family dwelling units, and the propertyto the west is developed with single-family dwelling units, and c The church site was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29 with the exception of the architectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with a Master Plan and the issuance of a Negative Declaration Conditional Use Permit 88-10 was also included the master plan for the church In 1994, the church completed its first permanent bulding, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose building that is presently used for worship services, and . ~,C, p,T ly`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 2 d The Variance request is to allow a maximum budding height of 45 feet where a maximum height of 30 feet is permitted, and e Literal enforcement of bwlding height would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property by requmng the budding pad elevation to be reduced an additional 15 feet, which would require significant amounts of earthwork and result in a practical difficulty that would require substantial structural design modifications that have not been regwred of similar protects Further, the protect has been designed with a depressed pad elevation to mitigate the 45 foot height, and f There are exceptional crcumstances applicable to the subtect property that do not apply to a matority of other properties in the immediate surrounding area because of the factthat the property is a church and the proposed sanctuary budding has a pad elevation that ranges from 6 to 30 feet below the street grades of Haven Avenue, and 30 feet below the street grade of Vista Grove Street Because of the existing topography of the site, the proposed budding heights will only protect 15 feet above the street grade on Vista Grove Street, which is the nearest local residential street, and g Literal enforcement of the bwlding setback would deprave the applicant of development entoyed by other properties in the Hillside Overlay District by requiring the applicantto significantly alter the proposed design of the protect by providing an alternative subterranean design, which is atypical of architecture for worship buildings in residential distracts, and h The granting of the Vanance will not constitute a special privilege because on February 9, 1983, a Vanance (Vanance 83-01) was granted to Hillside Community Church for a 50-foot height limit for the sanctuary as part of the original Conditional Use Permit (Conditional Use Permit 82-29) for the church Further, the granting of the Variance will not constitute a speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone in that worship centers in residential districts are often architectural focal points that exceed the allowable height limits through the use of steeples and bell towers or similar features, and i Granting of the Vanance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the worship center will protect 15 feet above the street grade on Vista Grove Street, half of the allowable 30-foot height limit 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code, and b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, and c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, and P~tC~D,z. -N~o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 3 d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified m the same district, and e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mlurious to properties or improvements in the vianity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negatroe Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent Iudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. • b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as conditions of approval c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subfect to each and every condition set forth below 1) Variance approval shall expire if Bwlding Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval. 2) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No 05-60 approving Development Review DRC2004-01019 shall apply 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or pj,c, ~, T I 'i'1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 4 employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Environmental Mdipation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 6) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray g,,c,D, s ~y 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 5 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statementthatwork crews will shut off equipmentwhen not m use 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 6 or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdehnes • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting . the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San . Bernardino County Museum ~tC,D,z X50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 7 • Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved bySCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit . to Bwlding Offiaal for approval, Storm W ater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum• a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debrs or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 13,C,D, ~ ~5 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 8 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WQMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permts 7) Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins. 8) Efficient Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken spunkier heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water regwrements • Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. 9) Storm Dram Signage. All storm drain inlets and catch basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream " Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained 10) Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The containerfloor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adtoirnng roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein 11) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will beused on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and • Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 B,c,~~z ~5a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 9 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8'00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level momtonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bwlding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the • above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwidmg Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The wall at the south property line shall be constructed as early as possible 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ~'C~~~~ X53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-61 VARIANCE DRC2005-00321 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 10 BY. Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. '~j,C,~~T 1`J`~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ~ PROGRAM Project File No.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01019, VARIANCE DRC2005-00321, VARIANCE DRC2005-00322, AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ` 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B~G,p,T 15`J Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2004-01019, DRC2005-00321, DRC2005-00322, AND DRC2005-00323 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requving the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reportmg Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants andJor pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2004-01019. DRC2005-00321. DRC2005-00322, AND DRC2005-00323 Applicant: Hillside Community Church Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: June 7, 2005 h .. ... -. , .. Av Quality - ,<<. ; a, The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil•stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Au construction Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept CP C During A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to construction reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CP C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Durng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactnre for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C Z4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication d 1 of 9 • i ! ! d H U ~ .. .. , .. . . Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPBO C Rewew of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as Cdy ~ Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and inihate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible• • Reestablish ground cover on the construction sde BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of plans A/C 214 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Rewew of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices 2of9 n ~ ~ .. . . .. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is corned over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 requved to incorporate high-efficiencyflow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Rewew of plans A/C Z4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping ~ ~ Cultural Resources ~ ~_ - ~ p3~e al :tom ~ ~ ' t-.. rwaii ~.,Y Iz.e.. ~ ~ "`~ v= r .4a !t ~r;~~ ~.'~r~~?:~ ~ ~br ~" N ~~~;`-~ }, .;C.. Q-'f ("~va+l1 , . °~`~~ ~ "i^..~J _,~;•; ; ,.,- ; ~ °- ~ ;;< , -~_ ~. ~ , . _ ~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developerwill retain a qualitied archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of report ~ 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value H 3 of 9 .. • Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate California Envvonmental Quality Act (CEQA) gwdehnes • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and ~ proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original tllustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archroing A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specdic recommendations regarding further mtigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mtigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing ac4vihes elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the tend _~ d H 6 C 4 of 9 . . .. . . . . . .. . -. .. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Rewew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum `~%5logji and`Soils ~ '~ ~~;~'d~;~~' ~' ~;, ~~'r ~~; r ~ ~~~} .ma, ~;~; ~ ~ '~',m ca a x t?j r ,x. a ~ .~` ' s ' r p -~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ , '~ ; ~t„~"~°z ~ r . .h „ . . «a, ' ..+ ,~ s: t3. ~C ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~`~~ k ~ 5 The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of ~ consiruct~on Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to mirnm¢e PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction constructon areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. - t' • s., s s r rts'ae^i ~~5~' '"~i~a'~. 1„~~' ,s.~~, ~ ..HyijFOlogyandWaterOualR~: ~'~' ~':r :«..~,_ceki ~n~f~-'~', R^.~"~i ~.t~; S x s _ a+., n .'~":- w. 1. , z :!'~' a ~" ' ~' *~v~~': ~ r a - ~ ~~ '~ owk g a~" tdE2`~"t;'~'.i~ - '-" ,~ ~~ .tea` `{y' ~~ s ."F' a .,C a s:. +• kv %`~'~d-'~'»s' h ~ x~ l~+ke S~E it "k' +r it e~i;. '4C,~e~. ,:r '?i..:'. ~s ..;M~P9?9~ ~ yam. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/Ci/D Rewew of plans A!C 2/4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, a SWPPP specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actmties, from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. C N_ ~6 5 of 9 • . • ... -. .. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actroities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods as experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-sde or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program I within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as 80 B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 ~ sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and 1 after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 the W OMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits _~ d H 6 6 of 9 .. . -. .. Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins Efficient Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water regwrements Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surtace filtration. Storm Drain Signage All storm drain inlets and catch CE D/E Revew of plans A/C Z4 basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream" Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 ~ paved with an impernous surtace to mdigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor will be ~ graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adtowng roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WQMP, including a protect description and identily~ng BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The Wt7MP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 G r C r. U 7of9 i ! • .. .. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identdication Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Offical for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit .~,~ men.' ~~-°,',.,~"s°,,~rs~t,v_-^~~ a:~" Noise -M~:. ° ``~€„~_4': ~~~ „+a~a~ ',~ :e "~.., ! ` ( T F$" ~ ~ ~t~''''' ~.";~'~`n,~,t;.,~ x~ ~,~'~,~^~ f t$"` a ;~{uu~ tr, _ ~'~`r ,, ~ ••, " ^u,gs x ~ x >ti~- ~y~.`~t,,,',~° ' s~ . a by ~F« ~ ;'~, ~-c,^ ( e~, ,..,~. .a :~ ~~e R iW ~' ' r ° ,,., c,~sx~ ,rs ~, ~iz/+~C- ~" V 4+F 3~n ~_ "6'si3 x r . :- . f n._ . ~ Y ~ , _ fy :,dn~. !° v .3 +n`P+r y~ ~ A .f }r, V~~'~A'F~a ~ S.~Y.a. in rv f~^ rtl+.~Oe~R_ , ,,.~ z , ~'k o/{ ~ 4Y °G.Y.~:S'S~~ti..~~l.~• OAR Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bulding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The wall at the south property line shall be constructed CP C/D Review of A/C 3/4 as early as possible plans/During construction _~ t-1 !; 8 of 9 .. ... .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, rf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Respoi~sitile P_ersbri;:µ'~, d~.^z,;':'~'-~~.~~,~ ~ ~NI$~) ~r ~ g:F~~e ue~ ' N~t~$~ , 1'V~It~` ,~ w.e en_ct o_ns ' `'~~`~''~;~, CDD -Community Development Director or designee CP - Ciry Planner or designee A -With Each New Development B - Pnor To Construction A - On-site InspecLOn B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit ~ CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construc8on C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds H FC - Fire Chiet or designee 8 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation (~ • ~9 • RESOLUTION NO 05-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2005-00322, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED AVERAGE SETBACK FROM 45 FEET TO 25 FEET ALONG HAVEN AVENUE FOR PARKING STALLS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 76,019 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER ON 8 86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 to 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1074-271-01 A Recitals 1 Hillside Community Church filed an application for the issuance of Variance DCR2005-00322, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to Development Review DRC2004-01019, a 76,019 square foot worship center located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units, the property to the south is developed with future single-family dwelling units, the property to the east, across Haven Avenue, is developed with asingle-family dwelling units, and the propertyto the west is developed with single-family dwelling units, and c The church site was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29, with the exception of the architectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with a Master Plan and the issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Conditional Use Permit 88-10 was also included the Master Plan for the church In 1994, the church completed its first permanent budding, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose budding that is presently used for worship services, and ,~ , C, D, T I (o lv PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH . July 27, 2005 Page 2 d. The Variance request is to allow an average landscape setback of 25 feet, where a an average setback of 45 feet is regwred; and e Literal enforcement of the average landscape setback would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property by requmng the applicant to alter the protect design in a manner that would require substantial alterations to the parking lot design that would requre significant amounts of earthwork and result in a practical difficulty, and f There are exceptional arcumstances applicable to the subtect property that do not apply to a matority of other properties in the immediate surrounding area due to the fact that the parking stalls wdl be screened from Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street as a result of the sigmficant grade differential between the parking lot and the street From the intersection of Vista Grove Street, the street grades along Haven Avenue range from 1 5 feet to 14 feet above the parking lot elevation Because of the difference in grades, mature dense landscaping, and the remaining average landscape depth of 25 feet, the parking lot will neither be wsible from Haven Avenue nor detract from the Haven Avenue streetscape Further, the reduction in the landscape setback will provide an additional 24 parking spaces, thereby promoting the public welfare by providing additional on-site parking stalls and reducing the likelihood of street parking Therefore, the reduction in the landscape setback will not result in vehicles being visible from the streetscape, and . g Literal enforcement of the building setback would deprive the applicant of development entoyed by other properties in the Hillside Overlay Distract by regwrmg the applicant to significantly alter the proposed design of the protect by providing an alternative design that would require a subterranean design, which is atypical of architecture for worship buddmgs m residential districts; and h The granting of the Variance will not constitute a special privilege because similar Vanances have been given for setback reductions on artenals including, but not limited to, Haven Avenue Further, the granting of the Vanance will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone in that Vanances for setbacks for protects that have frontage on artenals have been granted to other protects, and i Granting of the Vanance wdl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the reduction in the average landscape setback wdl not result in an aesthetic degradation of the Haven Avenue streetscape since the parked cars will not be visible from Haven Avenue 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fords and concludes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obtectives of the Development Code, and • b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, and B~ C ~p~-=((07 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 3 . c That strict or Iiterai interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, and d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application . b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the prolect that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the prolect, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Plamm~g Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below 1) Variance approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval 2) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No 05-60 . approving Development Review DRC2004-01019 shall apply $~C, D, ~ 1(0~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 4 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Environmental Mmpation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,p) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained m good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Av Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Pianrnng staff ,B , C , D. ~ Ilo°I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 5 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local • ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to . incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 6 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or sigmficant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological momtonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find ~,C.~~,I 1'l l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 7 Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff ~,c,~,z ~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 8 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the WOMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins 8) Efficient Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water requirements Native or drought speaes shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. 9) Storm Drain Signage All storm drain inlets and catch basins shall have stenaling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream." Legibility of stenals and signs must be maintained 10) Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure. Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adtoining roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein 11) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the . City Engineer for approval, a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures ,~,C, D,T 1~.3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 . Page 9 consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at • the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bwldmg Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwldmg Offical within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwldmg Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The wall at the south property line shall be constructed as early as possible 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6.30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pj, C, D, T i "7'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-62 VARIANCE DRC2005-00322 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 10 BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST. Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~C~Di L 175 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01019, VARIANCE DRC2005-00321, VARIANCE DRC2005-00322, AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Pj~C,~~T l"7~ Mdigation Mondonng Program DRC2004-01019, DRC2005-00321, DRC2005-00322, AND DRC2005-00323 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monrtonng will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arse regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time 9 In those instances regwring long-term prolect monrtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monrtonng the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2004-01019, DRC2005-00321, DRC2005-00322. AND DRC2005-00323 Applicant: Hillside Community Church Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: June 7. 2005 - .. ... .. Air Quality The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A 4 soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air construction Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept CP C Dunng A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to construction reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CP C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions Ail construction equpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication ~d 'J 9 l~ ~J J r-4 .. .. -. .. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Rewew of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that tow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Rewew of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD 80 C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Paans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices 2 of 9 b H .. ... ~. .. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high words (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C Z4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualitied archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Revew of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value 3 of 9 ~ ~ s r -. . . . .. . .. . . Consider establishing provisions to requve CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) gwdehnes • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fosstls with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find ~ 4 of 9 d H oC 9-1 . • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D . 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils ~ ~ "~ ` ~ ' ' `~- ' r~~~i ' ~ ~ ~~y.~„r' e ~; ' = ~'~~ = ..~~ ~'`_.' . , ~:. , ~ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Durng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality ~ .:,; ,~,- ~~~a ~ fi,,.~=,;~~, . "Y "~ ~j"~.~~"~~y~a:.; ~ ~ ~` ~,'` - a ` ~~ , t V ,};, ~e<z ; " A ~ ' ~# . ..-. -f A' _ v +.+SS ~ {¢, RAk9 N ~.Y' ^ e~i /~c ~'~ "(St E- ) ~~A - r"n Et: {~ ~t , av ~ Prior to issuance of grading permds, the permit applicant BO B/Ci/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, a SWPPP specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities, from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5 of 9 .. ... -. .. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods as experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 ('~ sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there `j is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to t.~ prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the WOMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 6 of 9 .. ~ .. . .. Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins Effiaent Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water requirements Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. Storm Drain Signage All storm dram inlets and catch CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream" Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be CE D/E Revew of plans A/C 2/4 paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adfoining roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 (~ N ~ ~f9 • _~ --1 oC lJ' i ! • . .. . .. .. . . Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shali be submitted to the City Bulding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise - s, ~ _ ,: ~ -_ . Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specfied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report then findings to the Bulding Official wdhin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The wall at the south property line shall be constructed CP C/D Revew of A/C 3/4 as early as possible plans/During construction 8 of 9 .. .. -. .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4r hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings _~ ~il IJ 00 Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ ~ Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification ~ Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B - Olher Agency Permit /Approval 2 - W rthhold Grading or Bwldmg Perrnrt CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Pians) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 9 of 9 RESOLUTION NO 05-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2005-00323, A REQUEST TO ALLOW RETAINING WALL HEIGHTS RANGING FROM 4 FEET TO 16 FEET FOR PARKING STALLS AND BUILDING PAD ELEVATION PURPOSES WHERE A MAXIMUM 4-FOOT RETAINING WALL HEIGHT IS PERMITTED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 76,019 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER ON 8 86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 to 2 DW ELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1074-271-01. A. Recitals 1 Hillside Community Church filed an application for the issuance of Variance DCR2005-00323, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cu•~amonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to Development Review DRC2004-01019, a 76,019 square foot worship center located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units, the property to the south is developed with future single-family dwelling units, the property to the east, across Haven Avenue, ~s developed with a single-family dwelling units, and the property to the west is developed with single-family dwelling units, and c The church site was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29, with the exception of the architectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with a Master Plan and the issuance of a Negative Declaration Conditional Use Permit 88-10 also included the master plan for the church In 1994, the church completed its first permanent building, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose building that is presently used for worship services, and g, c, v, s ~ g7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 2 d The Variance request is to allow retaining wall heights ranging from 4 feet to 16 feet in height, whereas the Hillside Overlay District limits retaining wall heights to 3-4 feet The retaining walls are necessary to reduce the visual impact of the proposed buildings, the bi-level parking structure, and the parking stalls adjacent to the landscape slope along Haven Avenue The retaining walls are necessary for the 13 feet of cut that will be required to depress the pad elevation of the sanctuary in order to minimize the impact of the building height on the residents located on the north side of Vista Grove Street The retaining walls along the landscape slope are needed for the parking stalls behind the landscape area along the Haven Avenue frontage The parking stalls will not be visible from Haven Avenue because of the fall of the street and the existing mature landscape area The bi-level parking structure has been designed so that the lower deck is bwit into an existing slope, thereby making maximum use of existing grades and allowing the first level to be virtually subterranean The retaining walls are needed because of the existing topography of the site and to achieve sought after design goals of the Hillside Overlay District that will ultimately minimize the impact of the sanctuary and parking structure on the surrounding neighborhood, and e. Literal enforcement of the 4-foot high wall limit would cause a physical hardship and practical difficultly for development of the property by requiring the applicant to alter the project design in a manner that would regwre substantial alterations to the parking lot design, budding pad elevation, and parking structure that would requve significant amounts of earthwork and result in a practical difficulty that is inconsistent with objective of the Hillside Development Regulations, and f There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the subject property that do not apply to a majority of other properties in the immediate surrounding area because of the fact that the project site has a substantial amount of fall that will allow a depressed building pad elevation, parking structure, and parking stalls to be constructed that will not have a negative visual impact on the surrounding area, and g Literal enforcement of the retaining wall height limit would deprave the applicant of development enjoyed by other properties in the Hillside Overlay District by regwring the applicant to significantly alter the proposed design of the project by providing an alternative design that would regwre multiple terraced retaining walls, which is atypical and uncommon for structures when the existing topographic conditions will allow the construction of wall heights that will not have a negative impact on the adjacent land uses, and h The granting of the Variance will not constitute a special privilege because similar Variances have been given for wall heights in the Hillside Overlay Districtwhere existing topographic conditions warrant wall heights above the permitted maximum Further, the granting of the Variance will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone in that Variances for wall heights for projects that have grade constraints have been granted for other projects in the Hillside Overlay District, and i Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, but, conversely, will allow the construction of a depressed bulding pad elevation, parking structure and retaining walls that will minimize the visual impact of the worship center, parking structure, and parking lot on the surrounding area 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows gee„D,T 18$ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 3 a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code, and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, and c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, and d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the prolect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the prolect that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed prolect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect asset forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below B,c,D, r -8~i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 4 1) Vanance approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval 2) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution No 05-60 approving Development Review DRC2004-01019 shall apply 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Environmental Mdigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAOMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. 2) Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speaficat~ons Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 6) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide ~,C, ~,T lq(~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 5 evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 9) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule actmties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations durng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use $,C,.D, T ~q I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 6 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 7 the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sorts 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved bySCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Qualrty 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwidmg Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame • JrC,~,T Iq3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 8 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WOMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing materials and atmosphenc depositions dunng roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins 8) Effiaent Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water regwrements Natroe or drought speaes shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess vngation runoff and promote surface filtration. 9) Storm Dram Signage All storm drain inlets and catch basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream " Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained 10) Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adloimng roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein ~,C,D,~ iq`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO OS-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 9 11) Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Nose 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property Ime The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The wall at the south property line shall be constructed as early as possible 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings !"j,C,D,T Iq5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-63 VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 -HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 10 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit . AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS (~, c, .~, s i q~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-01019, VARIANCE DRC2005-00321, VARIANCE DRC2005-00322, AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00323 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in-place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its cortesponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 d,c, p, Y Iq~ • • Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2004-01019, DRC2005-00321, DRC2005-00322, AND DRC2005-00323 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arse regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9 In those instances requving long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits ~,C, D, T Iqg MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project F[le No.: DRC2004-01019. DRC2005-00321. DRC2005-00322, AND DRC2005-00323 Applicant: Hillside Community Church Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: June 7. 2005 G n b H S s -. - .. Av Quality ~ ~ _ `., ~ - The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Av construction Qualty Management District (SCAQMD) and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW OCB)) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept CP C During A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to construction reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil oft-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CP C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Durng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions All construction equpment shall be maintained in good CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The construction contractors shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 1 of 9 G _~ ~i O O .. .. . . . ... . . .. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply wdh SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A!C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibddy of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices 2 of 9 .. ... -. .. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if sdt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordancewdh construction SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans A/C 4 alternatwe fuel powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not in use -~ All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. h All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Rewew of plans A/C Z4 S~ regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and © weather-stripping Cultural Resources. ~ ~ r , ~ ~ :~, ~ `a~~s ei 2 i ~ ,4y , ~;,~~ s a, ~' r c'^ ~ r ~ ~-%~~ ~ ~j yzlx??` `~ ' ~ ~~`~~ ~'~" r ~ irk ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~.~r -+5 4z~",~.~.* ~e„, .~.:.,~~ a;'~ ~~ ~:,` ': ~;~ -k`.,~ S`- p p „e . . g-2'- .:-4G' .4 ~' S: ~~ ',~ f on:.'~ ~w ' ~,i u;b~,2k..'*a1 ~~ wy> ~.ti~~w~ ~~d ~~}~t'~<r,.k, If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of report ~ 3!4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. 3 of 9 i ! ~ G ~i H Q; C Q • - .. • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A~ 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, wdh original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County i Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wdl also provide speatic ~ recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find 4 of 9 - .. ~ -. -. . .. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of repc.rt D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum 'tGeologyand:Soils'°fa'4`~'",:"' .':~~ ~"""?~~`~,~- .' ` ~ ; f'"T~ r i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~`~ - f~. w V yiltly ~ .` . , 1 .. 2 by b x<3~i V u ~ s _ a ~, ,~~~ { The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A " soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction q RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets sh ll b a e swept according to a BO C Dunng A schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- , site Timing may vary depending upon Ume of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction q from the site during such episodes d Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction q H areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions. ~ d , -~,. ,. P'k s,., ~~ c L~°».-i'r ~.Fiydrologyand Water.~Quality`~'~xy ~,~~~ ;'^~~ i r n .... •3Y. r.~ .a y itP A , . Y 1 x~~' ~. ^ `S3 ~ q` ,. nYl~t~ ~yp ~~ ~ ^ i nor to issuance of grading permds, the permd applicant O uA B/C/D eview of plans i A/C RR ~ ,~ ~ ~)n . SM[c'~3~y~A.d ± 2/4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, a SWPPP specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities, from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5of9 n H .. .. . . An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C yq the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods as experienced in Southern Cal~fomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to t BO B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C yq preven discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and BO B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C yq after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in BO B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C the W OMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May yq 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C yq controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesficides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 6 of 9 ~J ~.-' Q .. -. ~. .. Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing CE D/E Review of plans A/C 2/4 materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins Effiaent Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C Z4 features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water requirements Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess J` vrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. Storm Drain Signage All storm drain inlets and catch CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream" Legibility of stenals and signs must be maintained Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be CE D/E Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 i paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the I structure Ponding will not occur within the trash ~ enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awrnng to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adtoinrng roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein. Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/GD Rewew of plans A/C Z4 submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WQMP, including a protect description and identrfying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the stone drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7 of 9 d H Q .. , .. -. .. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the l CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C yq app icant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply wdh obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit t p_y1 NOISe'µ=,S w,"to'rVCYEa,',jA~rliK:tP:Si~SarlTw'SX~biXYQ.~H M - ... _i tom.». ...:~'S"'ao'.. a ~t F: w,. ',,"{,~'. ;~-'+~„ _. T .. .`~ .k: h~ Y' ,.. -.A YY~"»i` K ~yR`r tz- ~'`y.+e'SF ~r ;bRStE :rS x3i £xY1 •~.~-~i ..eett M~, 'Y.Y'~= :..- `tWl~.« ••2: ` .~ui}~ ~ ¢¢~~~~ xl, X ~y~t ' .~ . +t _ ~ ~ ~~~ , -§'~ 4.,'." v. :,5`,° v~: n'f e'- mi 3, .t} <: n tr ~:~ a ~ >i;L Construction or grading shall not take l b t ~ ; : s :x f . <r ~,_wxH~, hNi l,P ..".E~'-:~.+.•s ;s : fia`M, xr ~~%l~~ ~}z'` ~~. ~•r: ~s ~+~ p ace e ween the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays BO C During q 4 , including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a construction national holiday Construction or gradin noise level h ll g s s a not exceed the BO C Durin standards specified in Development Code Section g A 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the properly Ime The construction developer shalt hue a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level momtonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be requved by the Bwldmg Official. Said consultant shall report then findings to the Bwiding Official wdhin 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwldmg Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actmties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The wall at the south property line shall be constructed CP C/D Review of A/C as early as possible. plans/During 3/4 construction 8of9 .. .. -. • .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4!7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally taps (counting both to and from the constructlon site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any constructlon traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Peison~~;~,~.~;<4rf~"~Y~',~,~t'"; ~ sjy(o~ltb~ng Fiegue~•t~to~i" ~•,~ Mei~`orj ot;,lCerif(c~at~on 5aiicifons ^~'{~"~~''~'~~~"r CDD -Community Development Director or designee A - W ilh Each New Development A - On-site Inspection * 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map I~ n CP - Ciry Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 • W ithhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Pians) 4 -Stop Work Order H PO -Police Captain or designee F E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds C -Fire Chief or designee a -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation d 9 ~--,, t~~~r~ ~~ ~ ~ T H E C I T Y O F Rnncno Cucnr~oncn Staff Report DATE July 27, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16981 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A subdivision of 2 43 acres of land into four lots in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place -APN 1062-061-03 Related Fiie Development Review DRC2004-01170 VARIANCE DRC2004-01169 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A request to reduce the lot width on four lots on 2 43 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place -APN 1062-061-03 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 2 dwelling units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-famtly homes, Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-family homes, Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-family homes, Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-family homes, Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS F & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16981 AND DRC2005-01170 -SPIES, BRYAN & BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 2 D Site Characteristics Single-family residences bound the site on the north, south, east, and west Hellman Road is parallel to the east property line of the protect site and Cousins Place is parallel to the west property line of the protect site A row of Eucalyptus trees runs along the south property line of the site with the matority of trees being on the adjacent properties ANALYSIS A General The applicant proposes subdividing the property into. four lots for future development of 1single-family residence per lot Lot sizes are as follows Lots 1 - 27,693 square feet, Lot 2 - 26,793 square feet, Lot 3 - 26,755 square feet, and Lot 4 - 26,751 square feet The proposed parcel map and the lots created comply with the City's regwrements for lot area and depth that are applicable to this development district Each of the four lots, though, is an average 7 17 feet narrower than the City's 90-foot lot width requirement The applicants have filed a Variance for lot width on all four lots The parcels are within the Equestrian Overlay and are able to meet the regwred 70-foot horse corral buffer from neighboring habitable structures, with each lot exceeding the minimum regwred lot depth of 200 feet by 123 feet (323 feet total) At this time, the applicants have decided to withdraw the submitted house plans in order to focus on the Tentative Parcel Map review process L_J B Desion Review Committee The Committee (Fletcher, Coleman) reviewed the protect on July 5, 2005, and recommended approval (Exhibit E) C Technical Review and Grading Committees The Committees reviewed the protect on July 5, 2005 The protect was conceptually approved D Trails Committee The Committee reviewed the protect on July 13, 2005 The applicant offered to construct a 7 5-foot Local Feeder Trail along entire south boundary, from Cousins Place to Hellman Avenue The parcel map and grading plan have not been revised to show this trail The Alta Loma Riding Club supports the protect with the addition of a 7 5-foot Local Feeder Trail (Exhibit G) The Committee recommended approval of the protect E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on June 17, 2005, at the adtacent residence to the north of the protect site A total of nine residents attended They were generally accepting of the lots with the provision that the applicant would follow through on his promise to construct a 7 5-foot equestrian trail adtacent to the south property line between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place Additionally, a few of the attendees felt that the reduction in lot width was not in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood A summary of meeting is attached (Exhibit F) F Envvonmental Assessment There are 22 Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees in a windrow along the south protect boundary, mostly off-site, and 3 Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees along Hellman Avenue An arborist evaluated these trees and determined that only four (including the three along Hellman Avenue) are in good health and at least fair structure The arbonst did not recommend preserving those with poor health and/or structure Of the ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16981 AND DRC2005-01170 -SPIES, BRYAN & BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 3 four healthy trees, the three located along Hellman Avenue must be removed to widen the street to City standards To preserve any of the trees along the south protect boundary will require the applicant to redesign their grading concept to eliminate all cuUfill and retaining walls within 10 feet of the tree trunks After review of the Initial Study and any applicable mitigating measures for the protect, staff has determined that the protect will not have a significant effect on the environment Accordingly, a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration has been prepared G Variance The applicant has applied for a Variance to reduce the regwred 90-foot lot width on all four proposed parcels by an average 7 17 feet FACTS FOR FINDINGS The purpose of a Vanance is to provide flexibility from the strict application from the strict application of development standards In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property Following are facts to support the necessary findings Fact Literal compliance with the lot width requirement of the Very Low Residential District would cause a physical hardship for the property owner in that it would create lots much larger than the matority of existing lots in the surrounding area The proposed lots will be developed meeting all City development regwrements for the speafied zone except for lot width In fact, the lots will be 123 feet deeper than the regwred 200-foot lot depth Conversely, the literal compliance with the 90-foot lot width regwrement would create lots that are substantially larger in depth and width than the surrounding area, which is inconsistent with the obtectwes of the Development Code Finding That stnct or literal interpretabon and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the ob~ect~ve of this Code 2 Fact The existing parcel is exceptional in that the subdiwsion of the lot using the regwred 90-foot lot width would result in two lots that are much larger in width, depth, and area than the other lots in the same zoning district Finding That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable fo the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone Fact The granting of the Variance for the lot width reduction will allow the subtect parcel to be subdwided into lots that are of similar overall size and character to the lots in the surrounding neighborhood Finding That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of pnwleges enjoyed by the owners of other properf~es in same zone ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16981 AND DRC2005-01170 -SPIES, BRYAN & BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 4 4 Fact The granting of the Variance will not constitute a speaal prmlege in that the newly created lots will be of similar lot area and meet all City development requirements for subtect zoning district except for lot width Finding That the granting of the Varrance wtll not constitute a grant of speaal pnvdege inconsistent with the l~m~tat~ons on other properties classified in the same zone 5 Fact The reduction of lot width wdl not negatwely affect nearby properties or improvements nor will it negatwely affect the public health, safety or welfare in that the newly created lots will be of comparable lot area to the surrounding lots and will be developed meeting all other applicable City Code criteria Finding The granting of the Variance wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in~unous to the properties or improvements in the warnty CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vailev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts and the approval of Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 and Variance . DRC2005-01170 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Bra Buller City Planner BB TV\ma Attachments Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Sde Uhhzation Map Exhibit C - Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM16574 Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated July 5, 2005 Exhibit E - Neighborhood Meeting Summary dated June 17, 2005 Exhibit F - Letter of Support from Alta Loma Riding Club dated June 17, 2005 Exhibit G - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2004-01169 EFL J y ~ OB SITE ti ~ WILSON AVE. U y H y } F- W a. NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP ~XH18~T fit ~, ~s ,. ~~'- _p_J I ~~ L ~ I I ~I I I I I ~ 1 F I r---~ III I P I I 1 I ~ I I I I I I I L___J ~II 1 ___J P I P I I ~ I I I ~;r.. , .,g - --~...s I g I L__J r--~ I P I I ~ I I I ~~g,, r---~ I I I P I I ~ I I I L___J Il/ I I L__J I\ (\~ I P , I J I I I II I ~ I I 1 I II I I I l-__~ '1 __~ I l l R I I i I I ~ , I ' I II P 'I I I _-~ I I I I II I 'I II I I r-~ I , II ~ I r-----~ I I I I P I I ~ ~ I II I P 1 I I r -J pe_I j~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I61 C I L_ J L!!!J L_J I'~ IPI I I~ I P I 'I~ i I I I~ I ~ I r-~ ~~ IRg IIT ' L l ---- L_J _____ I I I' _J ~ L__~ --------- ^ ____ ______ I P I I~ I I ^'~ r III I ~, r--~C-~ i L - I I l ~ L__F_J ^ ~ i L_ I J / rR 1 I I I I P I I I I L___J __p._~ rB, I ~ I -- - -- I I I 1 I I I II I I r~ , 1 I!! I 1 I 1 1 5 1 1 I L J I ~I 1 r- ~-~ I I I 1 I I I ~ I 1 I P I ~ P' I I I I ~ I I C I r--~ ~ P i f I P I 1 ~i I ~,~ I I I J L 1 L I 1 1 1 L_ _,J I ___ L J 1 --.~--;-- - -Tr- ICI Jl I I I ~ 1 I I f___. I I I P ~ ~I I I -~ J I I I I L___. Y I ~I I I I I I I f-P -, I I I I I I I I L_ __ L I I I I 1 r. I' , I I~ I i i ~ I 4n ' 1 1 I \ \ _ ~ J I I I I I I I I p I 1 I I I I 1 i I I I r---- I P r--1 I i I r P, I E I IJ I I I i 1 I I I~ I I i I I ~f L___J I ~Ly I I L J ~__ ! I ~, 1 I -_~ - _ `7 r--~ I P I i I ~ I _~ I I •'- L__J I P ~ F I L_!Y__l I II r~ I I r~ LJ I I I PI 1 ~I I I P ` I r J L~! a I I 1 r- L___J 1 I L_ I ~ , ~ r I I r--~ I I r--~ r'R~ I I P I rF1 1( I P ~~ LY I P I 1 I I I I I I~ ~ E Lii ~ J I i6 I L_J I J_ Lf / I I I ~ b - I I / I I I I L__J ' / _J I I - , • ~~N~~~t 8 ~B ~~~ -n __ J, __+~Lr J ~, ~~ m X i 1 1 I .~~ s• I I l0i NEi ANEA SF 1 97 697 Z 98 797 7 9e 7ss 4 9e 761 rora 1w 199 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 16981 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 3, BLOCK 10, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY _ __ sa9srz~•E ___ WILSON AVE I - -_ ~, ...__ ~ ~ II ~~- --'--- --------- - ` _. - ---- I , - - - ~ --'-- • I Y .epx ~ ,, w +` ,., ~.. ~ ,n __ -._ ____ _____ ____ __ __ _- ~- I," I ~i: n«" __ .. i ~F'J ~~• •`•~„• ~ 1~.e 55 Y ~• -'Se9Q 1TW ..~___ d' _ i ,1•- ,P ~ ~c ___ ~. J J~ ______ _ r , __ , I .,m -' I I, •' ,i NORTH uNE 1' - ev ---~ ~m L~'..., r.a ~. 9 ;. ,,,,, -~ I _G -,i.. '~~ ~I 1 I i P: , Q I ,r .. SYi CI'l T ,,,»., rn nl I nom~ia c,`I - a- _ _ _____ - n ,,,` ~.. ~p• ~ ~~, _, ._ rem nim~l i - ___~ I hi , ~ f I ~e L.____--__--__--____ _ --- ,- - _ s_---- - _ ~ 81n~< , ~w•-~----•~- --39k2l----- - ----Se4A'*W`J -1-- L ]I]Ye _ _ __ 599 ~1V'W '•u~- -______ ~ I , , ~ Y` __ 'TSB ~ - .. ~~ ~ _ ___ I I _ ~I _ 'yl Ic n,ye ~ a I 1 _ `~11 t„o` a ~,r ~ ~ I }{I'f^) ~ - - n,. , lOT 4 - 1 ,~~__ m ~ I LOT 2 ~ ~ ,pl:r R I n~_ ~•' nitigf0.c"vo. r,a ~a -1•' I„ ',. .. k`' ~ I ~ .mm,.. ~_ lei e-+~~:, ~i l_u~~Y„ ,y Sri :+, an .q°w°.v~ I', I~ ~,~ ~..urn< ~_-~`:.nn I r ~I 1 al ____ _ _ '+•IrFyP _ _ 1. ~-~__I r, t, .~__,~_____ _ ___~„~„~ _ off„ _~, ~}~ti~ I~. ..;1°~I ~.i. „ I I~ I V) I~ I~ I U i....,,1 I ~( 1 I ~' I I t`- ~~~ r 1 ~ JJJI I I~~, `~ ),~Y " , +° r1\~ 'F!f xTA ` _ An, ^[~ - ~6 li y,x Y - 5e9 a]']PW i. ~ l` r "~ e ^ . uu ~ ` e L~ ~ Ir ° I` I ~~~• ~ ~ _ __ -- „ v , • . ~ ~ I .. , n~n~v'v ~ am * Ir ° • II a,9 r, DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Tabe Van der Zwagg July 5, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16981 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A subdivision of 2 43 acres of land into 4 lots in the Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wtlson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place -APN 1062-061-03 Related Files Development Review DRC2004-01170 and Vanance DRC2004-01169 VARIANCE DRC2004-01169 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A request to reduce the lot width of 4 lots on 2 43 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place -APN 1062-061-03 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 and Development Revew DRC2004-01170 Design Parameters The protect site is located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place on a parcel of 2 43 acres The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with an overall depth of about 646 feet east-west by 165 feet north-south All of the surrounding properties are developed with single-family residences The existing topography slopes from about 1,778 feet on the north side of the lot to about 1,771 feet on the south side The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into four parcels for future development of one single-family residence per parcel Parcel sizes are as follows Lot 1 - 27,693 square feet, Lot 2 - 26,793 square feet, Lot 3 - 26,755 square feet, and Lot 4 - 26,751 square feet The proposed parcel map and the parcels created comply with the City's regwrements for lot area and depth that are applicable to this development district Variance Each of the four lots is a little over 7 feet narrower than the City's 90-foot lot width requirement The applicants have filed a Vanance for lot width (DRC2004-01169) The parcels are within the Equestrian Overlay, and with each lot exceeding the minimum regwred lot depth of 200 feet by 123 feet (323 feet total), the requrement fora 70-foot horse corral buffer from neighboring habitable structures is easily met At this time, the applicants have decided to withdraw the submitted house designs (DRC2004-01170) in order to focus on the Tentative Parcel Map review process Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 Staff recommends that a 15-foot long segment of local feeder trail be provided at the southeast comer of Lot 4 to provide trail access to the vacant parcel to the south The applicant has offered to provide a continuous 7 5-foot local feeder trail along entire south protect boundary Staff supports this concept because it would provide maximum trail access for all proposed lots, and the three property owners to the south Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed parcel map as submitted to the Planning Commission EXHIBIT ~ E F~' • \J DRC COMMENTS SUBTPM16981 -STEVE SPIES, July 5, 2005 Page 2 PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Coleman Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwagg The Committee approved the project as presented c, ~ g Neighborhood Meeting Report SpiesBryan Property June 17, 2005 at 5:30pm • Introductions Process/Nohce to Neighbors/posting of site -future nonce of heanngs Discussion of development plans Grading plan, map of trees, conceptual floor plans Floor plans Four parcels -two pazcels to face Hellman and two parcels to face Cousins Sewer from Cousins proposed for all parcels 82 5' x 315' d~mens~ons for each lot North to south easement for bridal trail between parcels - equestnan use Trees on south of property - no block wall/ will put in wrought iron Propose 7 5 equestrian trail on south side of property m sewer easement Proposed single story homes/garages will not face streets Vaziance for lot wide 90' required/ 82 5 proposed (all set backs met) • Comments Is there rear yard access for neighbors to the south? 7 5' equestrian trail access to reaz yards What is happening on south property line it neighbors need access to rear yard? 7 5' access along south property line Are you required to maintain an easement on south property line? • No Is the rear access to adjacent yards need to be maintained? No (per City Planner) How will the trees be maintained? Couple of trees on proposed subdevelopment, 2 on property Ime The rest aze on the property of neighbors to the south All will be saved except three-franked-tree on Hellman Does the public decide if the trees will be removed? No the City decides (per City Planner) It is a concern for the variance for the 82.5' width. The 315' depth will permit all four lots to be equestnan keeprng, all set-backs vnll be met Are you going to match existing architecture? Yes we will attempt to, but we will look to the City for guidance What rs the grade elevation? Approximate 4' difference between each lot north to south How will drainage be handled? Drainage will be to street Will drainage go to the bridal trail? It is a big concern. City Engineer will requue drainage to the handled m street and storm dram. What about two estate lots of 1.2 acres? 1 2 acres v 0 6 acres, maintenance issues on 1 2 acre lots ExNie~r ~ ~ , ~~o • Pictures of type of home passes azound Approximately 3200 square feet homes 42' front yard setbacks Horsekeepmg m rear Single story homes • Plot plan showed to attendees Lots 315' deep Craftsman style homes with direction from the Crty Two story homes would obstruct view -single story will preserve view • Comments Will City allow three homes instead of four homes. Previous plans had a private street with 4 homes. This plan took up too much property With 3 homes you would need a private drive and rt would be difficult to keep the 200' depth average What is the depth of the property from Hellman to Cousins? 647 feet When will development occur/ ASAP Debris removal as quickly as possible then rough grading When with the hearing be held? Late July and so far the Crty supports the variance Is the 7.5 easement existing? No, but protect proposes equestrian trail i E, F// SPIES/BRYAN DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 6-17-05 PRINT NAME ADDRESS -PHONE EMAIL rh ..-v ~~ 11, I- _ ti °I ~ , J %/~ ~~/mil ~,1~1~ lC l / /: ~ , ,. [' I ~,111C~1: ~dvr~~~~'C ~~"~L `-~~1 :? (_i,l.:~v,> ~I - ~Il)`~ ~'I~c~-~i_; f'c'~~t~J~'~;t ,,~~~. ~ t ' , % _ ~/ ,~ ~- '~~ V A~ ~ I I I °~V ( i I ~ ~ I ~. ~~ ~ 9 ~ / I i~ / s • • June ] 0, 2005 Dear Neighbor, You are invited to a neighborhood meeting to discuss our proposed development of four single family homes Date Friday, June 17, 2005 Time 5 30 pm Location The Jansen/Sailors Residence 5795 Cousins Pl Alta Loma, CA Complete Protect Description "ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16981 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - Asub-department of 2 43 acres of land into 4 lots in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place - APN 1062-061-03 Related Files" Development Review DRC2 004-0 1 1 70 and Vanance DRC2004-01169 " Steve Spies Ltnda Bryan Pt'ter Rrvan P O Box 758 Alta Loma, CA 91701 (909) 481-0707 ~~ ~~3 June 17 200 To Whom It May Concern On behalf of the Alta Loma Riding Club I have evaluated the plans for the development of the property that Peter and Linda Bryan are prepanng to develop In the process of this evaluation I also looked at their request for a variance to develop the property into four lots that would be narrower than the normal requirements Upon review of the plans, I find the square footage of the lots to be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood While the proposed widths are narrower than normal, the lots are also deeper than normal I find that these changes do not deter from the horsekeeping needs that the normal regwrements are intended to protect The one recommendation that 1 would make is to add a normal local feeder trail easement to the south of the southwest lot This would allow for equestnan access for that same lot and the one to the south of it for future development I would also acknowledge that this would be for ndmg access, not the normal looping dnve access that we normally look for, due to the placement of the fire hydrant where the northsouth trail meets Wilson Should you have any question regarding this review and recommendation, please feel free to contact me at (909) 945-3159 Cordially, C~~ I~~~~''~ Carol Douglass Alta Loma Riding Club, Gty Liaison P O Bot 116 Alta Loma, CA 91701 ~1~C~ 18 - t ~ ~ ~~ e ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) City of Rancno Cucamonga (Please type or punt eleady using ink Use fhe tab key tomove /rom one line to the next line ) Planning Omsron (908) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is fhe responsrbil~ty o/fhe applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, Gty stall wdl not be evadable fo per/orm work required to provide missing mformahon Application Number for the pro/ect fo which this form pertains SUBTT16981, DRC2004-01170, and DRC2004-01169 SUBTT16981, DRC2004-01170, and DRC2004-01169 Protect Title Spies-Bryan Parcel Map and 4 Lot Subdiwslon Name 8 Address o/protect owner(s) Steven Spies, Peter Bryan, Linda Bryan 1721 N Valle)o Way, Upland, Ca 91784 Name 8 Address o/developer orprolect sponsor Same • I ~ I EXHIBIT G Inrt~al Study Part1Hellman-Cousins doc ~~ F ~5 Page 1 of 9 Rev FEB 0 82005 t'r-('rl' l~~ - PI (INNING Contact Person & Address Peter Bryan 6919 Onyx Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91701 909-481-0707 Name & Address o/person prepanng this form (d d~%erent from above) Peter Bryan and EGL Assoaates -Hank Jong 11823 Slauson Ave #18, Santa Fe Spnngs, Ca 90670 562-945-0689 909-481-0707 Telephone Number 562-945-0689 '1) Provide a full scale (&12 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pm/act sde, and indicate the sde boundanes 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representahve wews into the site from the noRh, south, east, end west, wews into and from the site /rom the pnmary access points that serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3) Protect Location (descnbe) The protect site locates at south 150 feet of Wilson Avenue, and between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet r/necessary) 1062_061-003 •5) Gross Srte Area (adsq %) 2 43 Acre/107 102 square feet •6) Net Sde Area (total site size minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedications) Same 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would a%ct the protect sde (attach add~GOnal sheet rf necessary) • C Whotos 8 Misc-Hellman and CousinsWlanning Initial Study Part1Hellman-Cousins doc Pege 2 of 9 Rev 3/17/04 {.-.-/ ~ ~~ Information indicated by an astensk () ~s not regwred of non-conshuchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by sta% 8) Include a descnphon of all permrfs which will be necessary /rom the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies rn order to fully implement the pro/ect Building Department permd for four (4) SFR dwellings Engineering Department any grading permit required, encroachment permits Planning Department determination of variance or minor exception and Parcel Map 16981 9) Describe the physical setting o/the site as it exists be/ore the pro/act including informahon on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and mails, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any exishing stmctun;s on site (mcludmg age and condition) end the use of the stmctures Attach photographs of signficant leatums described In addrt~on, ate all sources o(inlonnahon (~ a ,geological and/orhydrolog~c studies, biotic and amheological surveys, tra>fic studies) The site is vacant and undeveloped The site has been previously disked for weed abatement purposes There is an existing eucalyptus windrow on the south property line, as well as a single eucalyptus tree at the east property Ime, along the Hellman Avenue frontage The sde has single family residential development on ali ad)acent properties Newer single family residential development is located to the north and west, with more established single family residential to the south and east A 6 feet high masonry block wall is constructed on the north property line, with a 5-foot chain link fence on the south property line The site is relatively flat, with less than a 4 percent slope, drairnng to both Hellman Avenue (to east) and to Cousins Drive (to west) Soil has been "stockpiled" along the north property line, adjacent to the existing 6- foothigh block wall In addition, there is a pile of wood from prior site cleanup on the western portion of the site There is no known animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects except the eucalyptus windrow Soil instability are not expected but will be evaluated as necessary by an engineer C Photos 8 M~sc -Hellman and CousmslPlanning Initial Study Part1Hellman-Cousins doc Page 3 of 9 Rev 3/17/04 _ ~~ ~ ~ 7 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/orhrstoncal aspects ofthe srte Crte all sources olrnformabon (books, published reports and oral history) There is no known cultural or historical aspects on the site 11) Descnbe any norse sources and therrlevels that now a/fec[ the site (arroraft, roadway norse, etc) and howthey wdl al/ect proposed uses The only significant noise source would be from residential traffic, primarily on Hellman Avenue and secondarily on Cousins Place Noise impacts are expected to be minimal 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ect rn dated Thrs should provide an adequate description o/the site rn terms ofultimate use that will insult /rom the proposed protect Indicate r/ there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anbcrpated completion o/ each increment Attach add~honal sheet(s) r/ necessary The proposed protect will subdmde the existing lot (107,102 sq ft) into four (4) lots (Lot 1-27,693 SF, Lot 2- 26,793 SF, Lot 3-26,755 SF, and Lot 4-26,761 SF) The property rs designated m the general plan for very low density residential development The proposed subdmsion of the property rs m compliance and conformity vinth the general plan designation The requested variance from the average lot width of 90 feet wdl not be contrary to the ob)ectwes of the general plan as the viewer wdl allow development that is wmpahble with surrounding development All other development criteria rs being met, including lot area and lot depth The proposed project consists of a four lot tentatwe parcel map with four individual site plans for developmenUdesrgn review, along with a determination if a minor exception or variance rs requved for the minimum lot width CJ C Photos & M~sc-Hellman and CousinsWlanning InrGal Study Partl Hellman-Cousins dpoc Page 4 of 9 Rev 3/17/04 ~` ~ /O 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including inlormabon on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, orscenic aspects Indicate the type olland use (residential, crommercial, etc ), intensityo/land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The surrounding properties consist of existing single family residential There is an hrstoncal identified residential house which has been relocated to the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Wilson Avenue There rs a horse corral located at the south of the project site and at the north of the protect There is no known plants animals and any other cultural historical or scenic aspects at the surrounding properties 14) loll the pmposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale, or character o/the surrounding general area o/the profecty No, the proposed development as single family residential will match and be complementary to the existing surrounding single family residential development in the area 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-temr noise to be generated, including source and amount How Kell these noise levels affect ad/acent pmpert~es and on-site uses What methods o/soundproofing are pmposed The proposed development as single family residential will not generate any significant noise or increases in noise levels There may be short term noise associated with wnstrucbon on the site This will be mitigated through hours of operation and equipment mufflenng '16) Indicate pmposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees C Photos & M~sc -Hellman and CousinsWianning Initial Study Part, Hellman-Cousins doe Page 5 of 9 Rev a/,noa ~~ F ~ 9 There is an existing eucalyptus wind row on the south property line and a single eucalyptus tree along the east property line (at Hellman Avenue frontage) These trees will be examined by a certified arbonst to determine if the trees are healthy and can be maintained (or should be replaced) If any trees can be saved, they will be incorporated into the protect design 17J Indicate any bodes of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams None 18) Indicate expected amount o/ water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For /urther clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water D~stnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) 2400 Peak use (gaUDay) 2820 b CommeroiaUlnd (gaUday/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Peak use (gaUmin/ac) ^ Septic Tank X^ Sewer ll septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolahon tests It discharge to a sandary sewage system rs proposed indicate expecteddarlysewagegenerat~on (See AttachmentAforusageestimates) For futtherclanflcation,pleasecontactthe Cucamonga Valley Water D~stnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) 1080 b CommeraaUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential unds 4 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Each of the four proposed parcels is proposed with a minimum total area of 26,755 square feet, with each lot having a proposed width of 82 5 feet and a depth of 316 feet The proposed project will subdivide the existing lat (107,102 sq ft) into four (4) lots (Lot 1-27,693 SF, Lot 2-26 793 SF Lot 3-26 755 SF and Lot 4-26 761 SF) Ranoe 26 755 to 27 693 SF Attached (indicate whether units are rental ortorsale units) 21) Anticipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $Unknown to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ C,Photos 8 Misc-Hellman and CousinsWlannmg Initial Study Part, Hellman-Cousins doc Page 6 of 9 Rev 3/,7/64 ~ , ~'ao 22) Spea(y number of bedrooms by unit type 3-5 each 231 Indicate ant~c~pated household srze by unit type SFR 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be resdmg wrthm the pro/act Contact the appmpnate School Drstncts as shown m Attachment 8 a Elementary 4 b Junior High 2 c Senior High 2 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS • 25) Descnbe type of use(sJ and ma/or function(s) o!commeraal, mdustnal or mshtuhonal uses 26) Total fioorama of commercial, mdustnal, ormshtutional uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28) Numberolemployees Total Maximum Shdt Time olMaximum Shrtt 29) Provide breakdown o/anhcrpated/ob classrficat~ons, rncludmg wage and salary ranges, as well es an rnd~cahon o/the rate o! tine /or each classification (attach addd~onal sheet rtinecessary) C Photos & Misc-Hellman and CousinsWlanning InNal Study PanlHellman-Couems doc Page 7 of 9 Rev 3A 7/04 F '] • 30) Esbmation o/the number of workers to be hired that currently reside m the City '31) For commen:~al and rndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount o/arrpolluhon emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Drstnct at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, tire, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their abrl~ty to provide adequate service to the proposed prolect~ //so, please rnd~cate their response The proposed project is with m the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct and the Inland Empire Utilities Distnct 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples of hazanlous and/ortoxic matenals include, but are not limded to PCB's, redioactrve substances, pesbades and herb~crdes, fuels, oils, solvents, and otherfiammable liquids and gases Also note undergroundstorege o/any ofthe above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rt known No known C 1Photos 8 Macc-Hellman and CousinsWlanning InNal Study Pant Hellman-Cousma doc Page B of 9 Rev 3/17/04 ~ Fla 34) Will the proposed pro/ecf involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, ord~scharge ofhazardous antUOrtox~c matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above I/yes, prowde an inventory o(all such matenals to be used and proposed method o/disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipmentareas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans I hereby certity that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and in/ormation required /or adequate evaluation o/this pro/ect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that additional in/ormahon may be required to be submitted be/ore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date "T 6 ` ~ S Signature Title Own~~2 I p~.v~~-o~~ C Photos 8 M~sc-Hellman and CousinsWlannmg InNal Study Pant Hellinan-Cousins tloc Paga 9 of 9 Rev 3/77/04 C Fa3 70P0~ mao onnted on 01/26/05 from "lA 7P0" and "Unotkd tpg" 'I. - 47' i_%1 7• ~. .`"' ~- -s __ BOY^' s. .. •/ • 11771'00' W 117Y6'00" W Wc,w911/-mow w I'r=' 3 ii •. `~'_ ~4n \ 11 o\.i_,\'_ ~o .W r. /)~, / ,~, v' ,:\~l^__ `\~'r.~/i ~ !/-a ~lI /6~ I ~~ r `l ~/F/Ir I (~-' ~~ ~• ~: ,~ON^~\V\\ .. ~t ii ?' ,~Il~~ ;1~I~~;P: i. `l rr`_~i` yi /'1( r\ ~V 7 ( _" ~' i 4 L\~ ~ \C \ \ , ,_, / t ~tl \~\. ~i~ J ,r~~ Q/h.r ~_ `. v,.rF~ ~~ }~~1..) /' J7 t~ ,.S '>~ ) 1 `bey ~ ~I '.. IcA'\~ l " ~ ~~ //j~ ,~. z d-' IC :~' t `~~ t ' :~,. '_ - : P /~ ~ ' =..1F4 i ~'G~ • ~' _ i ~_a V _~4_ _ / _ / _ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~, fie, i A no ,1 1~ /~ ~~ •~~. ~ '/ ~ ~~_, ~ l~ ~ ~ ' 1 / ' ~ I 895- ~ 1 ~` ~S _ _ ~ v __ ~ / 9~ ~ 2 BM _'I -~'~-w-_ Y' E_2~ O / `~ I P a ~f s-,~.r- - _ m r ~ ..- i - 6 G o • I `~~ I ~\_ Flcoi~onlrW e io c ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~'~./'~~ ~''q R _ Basn __ ~-__- I i ~~ Ali NY N _3r y~ ~~ G/~'~' - r t ' t~_ _ ___ ^ ~~ •i. W_ /651 ~-_ f ' w 1 I ~ °~ _ ~~ W J a 0 ! ~ v ~ =• W •) _"_, ~ , C`><`ti {..ate ~ ^ C ~ •-v~ s ., ~ ¢~~ ~ ,, r7ards a 1. 0., ~_ ~ i:1;~•"eil "~t. .. ~.~-m =„~ jpc .,~ •yaV!!' ..-_- -- __ai - .,s ~___..~~-a-- i ++1~ .. 1`i~z:~t~~,:ll: ii. g T-1-_ r-~° i ,.': , l.cete., ell] t.. ti ( - -r a't 7 fa W. i V ' ,~~ r n is \ ... ..Ic ~ ~ f._ • Y -^ sJs.\ ... '~.' - c i 1, ~ ~ • ~ _ ? ~ .r . "~'Lr' ~~ •\ 'o-~.rW vs.?' ~~__ '`~- ~ ~; ~W • ' ~ rT~- i "~, '~ '-o' i ~, c c 531 ~--.~'~ ,i ,u. 'P. w:,-_ . rte' ...., o-'~-: ,,."-..s-• --1 = % - - _ yam,- uvi~$~ C:i :;.c.:--~"' ~i •~' °:^::.~' / :~ _ . ». °" lt8 LoiOa ' i c• ~ .) ' f, - .~ Pd~eeae \\T E = ~~~I_' =~_ ~oTz t'e'i ~ i'• .ee~~~/«..«_~i ~ ' - ~~I ~~ R >; 't ;\~. .i --- •~ yr.~ a ~'•' r '~~•~".(=;I~-«_`3° - - _~., I an well il' . ,M' i ~f "r'~ vAlta Loma ~ "- `.~`3f '. t 17~T00" W 11776'00" W WG59411775'00" W TM 13QI o Im mi a »w tmw Mry mldwn!'['OPOIT~1167 NumlOmp~x l~a<smmJpopR~~P^7 C, Fa ~ ~ o • PHO1 PROJECT SITE (VIEWING SOUTHWEST FROM HELLMAN AVE) P HE T OF ~, Fa5 THE PROJECT SITE (VIEWING EAST FROM HELLMAN AVE) PHOTO 5 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE LOCATED AT THE EAST OF THE PROJECT SITE (VIEWING EAST FROM NELLMAN AVE) FHOTC OF Fay THE PROJECT SITE (VIEWING EAST FROM HELLMAN AVE) • s PROJECT ADdRESS HELENA PHOTO PHOTO PROJECT SITE (VIEWING WEST FROM HELLMAN AVE) ,+ '~ =THE E,F~7 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Protect File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 2 Related Files DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01170 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A request to develop 4single-family residences on 2 43 acres in the Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Cousins Place and Hellman Avenue -APN 1062-061-03 VARIANCE DRC2004-01169 -STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A request to reduce the lot width on 4 lots on 2 43 acres in the Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Cousins Place and Hellman Avenue -APN 1062-061-03 3 Descnptian of Protect TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16981- STEVEN SPIES, PETER BRYAN, LINDA BRYAN - A request to subdivide 2 43 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Cousins Place and Hellman Avenue -APN 1062-061-03 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address Steven Spies, Peter Bryan and Linda Bryan 1721 North Vallefo Way Upland, CA 91784 5 General Plan Designation Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) 6 Zoning Very Low Residential (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Settm west by single-family residences The percent slope The site is primarily neighboring properties to the south 8 Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drrve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 g The property is surrounded to the north, south, east and site presently drains from the north to the south at a 6 1 vacant with existing Eucalyptus windrows bordering the 9 Contact Person and Phone Number Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required None Fab' • • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 2 • GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR-Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics O Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils () Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality () Land Use & Planning () Mineral Resources (/) Noise () Population & Housing () Public Services () Recreation () TransportationRraffic () Utilities & Service Systems () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Date 6 S /~~ Reviewed B / Date ~ (/S/ Rev 1/20/05 (, / / Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 3 Less T"an Sigmhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources '°ta"+.auY Sigm4cant w"" MiOgatmn T"an SignJicant No I act Inca oratetl 1 act I act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but O (/) O ( ) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains a windrow of 22 mature Eucalyptus globulus 'Blue Gum' trees on-site and on the neighbor's land within 10 feet The arborist report (Jan Scow, December 6, 2004) concluded that the matority of these trees are in fair or poor health and relatively poor structural condition The arborist also stated that proposed improvements, such as grading and trenching would damage these trees The protect site contains no other scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) The project grading scheme shall be revised to eliminate all cut and fill and trenching within 10 feet of the Eucalyptus globulus 'Blue Gum' tree trunks, including those of neighbor's land. All on-site trees shall be pruned according to proper arborical practices Alternatively, the applicant may apply for a tree removal permit to remove trees subject to replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculate 'Spotted Gum' trees, 15-gallon size, along south tract boundary. 2) If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. c) The site is located approximately 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east and west The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission . Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution Rev 1/20/05 ~ F3U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 4 Less Than SlgmLCant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Patenaally Sgmhcant Wnh Mmgauon man Sgmhcant No I act Inca orates I act I act d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of the Ilght fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with the City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located approximately 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue and between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland m the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located approximately 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, east, and west The nearest agricultural use is more than 25 mile south from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated J Rev 1/20/05 `~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 5 Less Tnan SigmLCam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgn LCaint Ma gat on Signlcam No I act Incamaratetl 1 act I act AIR DUALITY Would the protect a) Conflict wdh or obstruct implementation of the applicable O O O (/) air quality plan b) Violate any au quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violatioM c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments. a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equpment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the Issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also Rev „20,05 C ~3a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 6 u Less Tl,an SignNCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potenuelty S,gmhcant wnn MOigaticn Tnan SigniLCanf No I act Inver oraletl 1 act I act conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCADMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM70 emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the Rev 1/20/05 E, F 33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 7 Less Tnan Sipnihcant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources sv~"„'=a'~; M„e'a,",on s„~,a,~an, No Im act Inco orated I acl 1 act General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particle Matter (PMip) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for . which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 1/20/05 ~~ F3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 8 ~~ Less Than Sigmbcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Poiehuanr Signdmam wnh Miogaoon Than signincam No Im acs Inco oratetl I act ~ act BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or U O U (/) through habitat modifications, on any speces identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitve natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict wdh any local policies or ordinances protecting O (/) O ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matonty of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any • wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are heritage trees on the protect site, and within a few feet of the southerly protect boundary, that will be adversely affected by the grading and the improvements The protect Rev 1/20/05 E F3S Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 9 Less Tnan SrgnrLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotenoally Srpndrwm wrm Mmgauon Tnan Srgmhcam No I act Into faletl I a[I I acl site contains a windrow of 22 mature Eucalyptus globulus 'Blue Gum' trees on-site and on the neighbor's land within 10 feet The arborist report (Jan Scow, December 6, 2004) concluded that the matority of these trees are in fair or poor health and relatively poor structural condition The arborist also stated that proposed improvements, such as grading and trenching would damage these trees The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1. The protect grading scheme shall be revised to eliminate all cut and fill, and trenching, within 10 feet of the Eucalyptus globulus '81ue Gum' tree trunks, including those of neighbor's land All on-site trees shall be pruned according to proper arborical practices Alternatively, the applicant may apply for a tree removal permit to remove trees subtect to replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculate 'Spotted Gum' trees, 15-gallon size, along south tract boundary. If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with sod, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, • Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor Rev 1/20/05 ~/ ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 10 Less Tnan Sipni4cam less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s9~li~~ah~ rya Batson sign i<am Na Impact Inrorporated I act Im act construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider estabhshmg provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archwing c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the protect sde, however, the area has a high sensitroity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvwm, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvwm per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that wdl also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and egwpped, to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actvrties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Rev 1/20/05 f` ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 11 Less Tftan Sigmacant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pocenually Sigmhcant wnn MNgaimn Than $igniliCenl No I act Inco oretetl I act Im act d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by the development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and the surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquetaction~ rv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic umt or soil that is unstable, or O O O (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Bwiding Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater ~J Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes wthin 1 8 miles south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 1 25 miles (north) These faults are both capable of producing My, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is 13 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„ 8 2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these taults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant Rev 1/20/05 ~/ F ~ ~l Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 12 • Less Tnan 9gnnsam Less Issues and Supportng Information Sources Potentiauv Sigmhcant w~~n Miogavon Tnan Sigmhcam No Impact Inco oralee I 6<t Im act b) The proposed protect will regwre the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, the development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~g emtssions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. T~mmg may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to mmim~ze PM~g emissions from the site dunng such episodes. . 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWoCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain mactrve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aqufer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Tutunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Ptan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically used for irrigating small grains and pasture plants The runoff is very slow and hazards of erosion is slight No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably toreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment Rev 1/20/05 E, f'3 q Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 13 Less Than SipniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potenaally signnsam Wnh Mitmaaan roan signnicant Ne Im act Inco orete0 Im act I act c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ~) ~) ~) ~/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () ~) ~) (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ~) ~) ~) ~/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the vicindy of a private airstrip, would ~) ~) l) (/) the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ~) ~) () ~/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () ~) ~) ~/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed prolect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated u c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the prolect site The project site is located within 3/4 miles of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed prolect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent . site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated Rev t /20/05 ~/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 14 Less Than SignNCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sipmhcant Wah Maipauon Than SipnNCant No I ect Incur oratetl Im act I as e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 6 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No Impact is anticipated f) The nearest pnvate airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limds No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire m the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table levee (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)° c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100•year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redvect flood flows Rev 1/20/05 L / >~ 7/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 15 Less Than Sipnihcam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenoany wnn rnan Signdsant Mmgavon Spnvcant r~o I ad Inco rat¢tl I acl I act i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, O O O (~) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (~) Comments. a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading . • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertorm inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the protect's construction contractor will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by EGL Associates, Inc on January 27, 2005, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from the driveways, roads, and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation • measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Achwhes Rev 7/20/05 ~ ~ i/ ~t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169-SPIES AND BRYAN Page 16 Less Than S~gntlicanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Wuh Than SigniLCant Mitigat,on Signibcant No Irtpact Inco oraletl I act I act 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site, as a result of this protect, will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Granular materials will be used at walkway areas. Post- Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WIMP) prepared by EGL Associates, InGJanuary 27, 2005 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a Master Plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete ground water supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities Rev 1/20/05 ~/ ~ /~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 17 Less Tean 9gmhcam less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po~enually SigmLCant wan Mmgauon roan Sipnihcam No I act Incarporatetl I acl Inpan c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the prolect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain taalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or ott-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected Rev 1/20/05 ~/ F L~C~ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 18 Less Tnan Srgml¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Fe+amially sigmLCam wnn Miogatmn rna^ sigmecam No I act nco ratetl I act ~ act h) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City and spreading grounds both within and north of the City LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or O O O (/) natural community conservation plan Comments a) The site is located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Cousins Place and Hellman Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north, south, east and west This protect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, east and west The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is Very Low Residential (12-4 dwelling units per acre) The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection The protect proposes a Variance to reduce lot width from required average width of 90 feet to 82 5 feet, however, the lot depth of 316 feet exceeds the required minimum lot depth of 200 feet The lot area of 26,070 square feet exceeds the required minimum of 20,000 square feet The purpose of a lot width standard in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) is to provide light, air, and open space between homes consistent with the rural character of the Equestrian Overlay Distract The proposed Site Plan indicates that all four homes will meet or exceed the required minimum interior side yard building setbacks from the property line, therefore, the intent has been met As such, no impacts are anticipated • c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural Community Plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, the development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals Rev 1/20/05 ~i ~' JS' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTMi 6981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 19 Lass Tnan Sipni6carn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fofantially Sipmf¢ern w~fn Mnipauon Tnan S~pnd¢ant No I act Inco rafetl I act I p because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Result m the loss of availability of a known mineral O O O (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11 NOISE Would the protect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the wcimty of a pnvate airstnp, would O O O (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels L J Comments a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding the City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact expected . b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated Rev 1/20/05 ~i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 20 Less Tnan Sigmlcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenoalty Sgm4canl wlin MnlgaLOn Than SigmG~anl No ImpaQ Irlpor orated I aCl Impa[I c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities wdl not signrficantly increase traffic, hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding the City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 6 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1l2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated Rev 1/20/05 L'/ ~'!~ ~7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 21 Less Tban Sigmlicam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenually Sipna¢ant waft Mmpaaon Titan Signd¢ant No I an Incorporatetl I act I act 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the prolect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c} The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Rre protections O O O (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments. a) The site, located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Cousins Place and Hellman Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 1/4 miles from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled Rev 1/20/05 r ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 22 Less Tnan SigniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Poienualry wnn Tnan pp g SigniLCant Mitigation Sipnd¢anf No I act Inca orated I act I act c) The Alta Loma School District School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will requre the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Heritage Community Park, is located 1/4 mile from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities, or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize the existing public facilities The site is in a developed area currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities, or alteration of any existing facilities, or cause a decline in the levels of service that could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on the library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be acceferated~ b) Does the protect include recreabonai factlities or regwre O O O (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments. a) The site fs in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Heritage Community Park, is located 1/4 mde from the protect site This protect is limited in size (4 dwelling units) and does not include a new large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above Rev 1/20/05 ~,F-~9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 23 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potenfially Sipni6cant with Mnigaaon Tftan $igml¢am No Im act Inco oratetl I act 1 ad 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, ether indroidually or cumutaUvely, a level of O O O (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (/) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 52 trips daily The proposed protect includes the development of four dwelling units The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each dwelling unit will generate 1 two-way peak hour trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle taps, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per the City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated ~_~ b) The protect will generate 4 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each dwelling unit will generate 1 two-way peak hour trips daily The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 6 1/2 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated Rev 1/20/05 ~/~CO Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 24 Less Tnan SiBmlitan~ Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potem,allr SigniLCam wan MM1ipation Tnan SignJ¢anl No I act Inco oraletl Im act I act d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not include any sharp curves, or dangerous intersections, or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) ~.J 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause sigmficant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments i) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • b) The proposed protect is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capacity The protect is Rev 1 /20/05 ~, f S/ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01 1 69 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 25 Less Tnan Sipnn,cam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially spndmam W,iCt Miopauon man $ipnd¢am No I act Into oratetl Im act I acl required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoffs will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the CVW D water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures • consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments. a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources, as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any • endangered or rare species would inhabit the site _ Rev 1/20/05 ~, FSa Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 26 b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources The mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact The proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels • EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev 1/20/05 E, FS~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBPTM16981, DRC2004-01170, AND DRC2004-01169 -SPIES AND BRYAN Page 27 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION . I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ~/.g~~i"^--- Date ~ //~/ZObs Pnnt Name and Title __ j rte/ tpC~ ~I~~~`j~ - ~~/7/~~_ • Rev 1/20/05 r~/ F <~ TOPO~ ma0 0m[ed on 01/26/05 from `LATPO" end "Un6lfed lpg" r ~_ 117700" W 117"6'00" W WG584117'+5'DO" W ~~ ~ ~~ s.. ., o ~~ ~ , - ~ ~ , ~ ~•, - - ~ ~ ~ o r - ~. l.M - ~ l R a v ~ •____ __ _.• ~,_ r~~. i _' ~ __ .~J _ m m Q .p,. __ ~-__ _ _ \-- _ _- o o _, _ s ~_ t a _ ~ _-~ Z t• ~ t / VA' 9'v .1 61 I /\ I 'I !a ~~ .. .t ~- -_r i r Wester i f< • I ••~1 f !- ___ _ _ i ~ an f'~ t 5 ~ ~ M n 1, .. ~ ~- ~ i- alar ~ i Jr= _-' Tan r~ ~ J ' ,i i~ ~ - C • ~, ~ `~ iy ~, aA ;: ~ I l .. Tank ~'~ i ~^'anw -.~_ ~ i ,.. ~ - s~~ ~ 2 , ~ .Y i" ."r• ~~ •~~ f b °o .Y o j " _ P m i~ a _ ~,~ ~ _ - ~. _ _ - 7~ ~~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~_ Flcad ~ _ ~ _' n.' __ ______~r 43 - - - _ a~ r~ ~'~~1 W ~ .o _ _- __ __ _ ~ rr~ r ,, ~~~.~. r _ , _ _ _ ~ _ _____ _" _, ____4 q"'_, ___ _1~_ k~~P~~ r - ~..... "~ I _ _ i ~n _ -. Ita Lama _ _ ,~. , 117n'oo" w lln6'oo" w wGSB4117zsoo" w ~3ti o era. a ean. ,sm. k7ap ara.es TulOmon dkr~ ~ c...miena) E, FSS City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negahve Declaration is being circulated for public review m accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Prolect File No.. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 Public Review Period Closes• July 27, 2005 Prolect Name• Project Applicant: Steven Spies, Peter Bryan, and Linda Bryan Project Location (also see attached map) Located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue between Cousins Place and Hellman Avenue - APN 1062-061-03 Prolect Description: A request to subdivide 2 43 acres of land in the Very Low Residential D~stnct (1 - 2 dwelling urnts per acre) into 4 parcels for the purpose of developing 4 single-family residences Related Files Development Review DRC2004-01170 and Variance DRC2004-01169 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding• The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477 2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Juty 27, 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By t~~ ~J ~p . RESOLUTION NO 05-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16981, A SUBDIVISION OF 2 43 ACRES OF LAND INTO FOUR LOTS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED 100 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND COUSINS PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 1062-061-03 A Recitals 1 Steven Spies, Peter Bryan, and Linda Bryan filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16981, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 27, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place, and The property is presently undeveloped, and c Single-family residences bound the site on the north, south, east, and west Hellman Road is parallel to the east property line of the project site and Cousins Place is parallel to the west property line of the project site, and d The application is to subdivide approximately 2 43 acres of land into four parcels consisting of the following square footages, and Parcel 1 27,693 square feet Parcel 2 26,793 square feet Parcel 3 26,755 square feet • Parcel 4 26,751 square feet Average Square footage 26,998 square feet ~, FS ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OS-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 2 e The applicants filed a Variance for lot width on all four lots The parcels are within the Equestrian Overlay and are able to meet the regwred 70-foot horse corral buffer from neighboring habitable structures, with each lot exceeding the minimum required lot depth of 200 feet by 123 feet (323 feet total), and f A row of Eucalyptus trees runs along the south property line of the site with the matority of trees being on the adjacent properties An open wrought iron fence will be constructed along the south property line of Lot 4 m order to protect the roots of the Eucalyptus trees, and Two lots will face Hellman Avenue and two lots will face Cousins Place. and h A Community Trail exists on the south side of W ilson Avenue to which all four lots will have access through a newly constructed Local Equestrian Feeder Trail, and A Local Equestrian Feeder Trail is proposed at the rear of each of the four lots, and ~ A 7 5-foot Local Equestrian Feeder Trail is proposed along the south property line of Lots 2 and 4, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically swtabie for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application . 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~; F58 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 05-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 3 Planning Department 1) All perimeter walls shall be decorative and have a uniform design compatible to those in the area, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 2) Open wrought iron fencing shall be used along the south property line of Lot 4 to protect the roots of the existing trees 3) Provide a minimum 15-foot wide (7 5 feet on each lot) improved Local Feeder Equestrian Trad easement at the rear of the four lots 4) Provide a minimum 7 5-foot wide improved Local Feeder Equestrian Trail easement along the south property line of Lots 2 and 4, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place 5) Trail fencing shall have a maximum 4-inch spacing between pickets 6) The Trail surface shall be decomposed granite with 4-inch minimum base Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth 7) Any drainage structures shall be located outside of the Local Feeder Trail easements 8) Install minimum 10-foot wide gates in trail fencing to prowde access to the rear yard at all lots Engineering Department 1) Hellman Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as requred and including a) Provide property line adtacent sidewalk, a c pavement, curb and gutter, one 5800 Lumens HPSV streetlight and street trees on Hellman Avenue frontage b) Provide arcular or hammerhead driveways on Hellman Avenue 2) Cousins Place frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City Local Street standards as required and including a) Provide property line adjacent sidewalk, dnve approaches, curbside drain outlets and street trees on Cousins Place 3) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) on the project side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole offsite south of the southerly protect boundary to the first pole south of the northerly protect boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, which ever comes first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs E; Fsg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OS-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 4 on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements be accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 4) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the Tentative Parcel Map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for technical plan check Environmental Mitigation Measures Aesthetics 1) The protect grading scheme shall be revised to eliminate all cut and fill and trenching within 10 feet of the Eucalyptus globulus'Blue Gum tree trunks, including those of neighbor's land All on-site trees shall be pruned according to proper arborical practices Alternatively, the applicant may apply for a tree removal permit to remove trees subject to replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculata'Spotted Gum trees, 15-gallon size, along south tract boundary 2) If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with sod, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 Air Quality 1) Ali construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning Staff t~, ~~O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 05-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 5 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil durng and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City .r silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use L/ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OS-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 6 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources 1) The protect grading scheme shall be revised to eliminate all cut and fill, and trenching, within 10 feet of the Eucalyptus globulus'Blue Gum tree trunks, including those of neighbor's land All on-site trees shall be pruned according to proper arboncal practices Alternatively, the applicant may apply for a tree removal permit to remove trees subject to replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculata'Spotted Gum trees, 15-gallon size, along south tract boundary 2) If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines >c~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OS-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 7 Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped, to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert . construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardino County Museum Geology And Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shail be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions . Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Offiaal for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ~; F~.3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OS-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 8 (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specrfy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site, as a result of this protect, will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be • performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) Granular materials will be used at walkway areas 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by EGL Associates, Inc/January 27, 2005 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and mirnmizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be morntored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of lwo years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New • Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 E, F~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 05-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 9 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bulding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bulding Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the . Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Richard Maaas, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of Jufy 2005, by the following vote-to-wit ~,F~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 05-64 SUBTPM16981 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 10 AYES NOES ABSENT C E, F~ CP City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Protect File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16981 This Mitigation Morntonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelmes As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department hawng the original authority for processing the protect Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 E;F~7 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTPM16981 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner 4 The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner ~s responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible Cary department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Diwsion shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances regwring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~~ ~C.GO ~~`~ ,~ ~C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16961 SUBJECT. SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN SOUTH OF HELLMAN, BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND COUSINS PLANS - LOCATION: APN 1062-061-03 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, tts agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No 16981 is granted subtect to the approval of Variance DRC2004-01169 B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaprng, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for • consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~~- -~- - -~-~- ,~~ ~. ~ 9 Protect No SUBTPM16981 Completion Date D. 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable Cdy Ordinances, and applicable Commundy or Specfic Plans m effect at the Gme of budding permit issuance • 4 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 5 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencng and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced /_/_ with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/_/_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora _/_/_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Offiaal d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail /_/_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet 6 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine _/_/ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot ~ owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CCBRs Landscaping 1 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _I_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be . conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition Z~,F7o Protect No SUBTPM16981 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department E. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $474 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTPM16961) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for Penang and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to partiapate in the Community Energy Effiaency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction Ail plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM16981) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department far availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Completion Date -/- - -/-/- _/-. /-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- /-/- 3G/~/~ Project No SUBTPM16981 Comole6on Date 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential pro/ect or mator addition, the applicant _/_!_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department pnor to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays H. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _I_I_ I. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work . 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_I_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /I_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map 2 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map 4 ~, F ~a Protect No SUBTPM16981 K. Street Improvements a~ 1 Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Hellman Avenue X X X X X X Cousins Place X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Comolehon Date -/. -/-/- /-/- -/-/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~, F 73 Protect No SUBTPM16981 g Concentrated drainage flows shall not crass sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty COUSINS PLACE Rhus lances African Sumac 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in HELLMANAVENUE Gegera parviflora Australian Willow 5 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in Under Utilities Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid - 3 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal Fill-in 'Tuscarora' Pink L. M. N. Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance wtth City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxiaties or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to /oin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Drainage and Flood Control Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Comolehon Date -/- - -/-/ -/-/. /-/- /-/- -/- . -/-/. ~~ F ~~ Pr01ec[ No SUBTPM16981 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater Distract (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Cary Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submttted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Comolehon Date -/-/- -/-/- -/- - -/- ~~~75 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS • December 9, 2004 Bryan/Spies Parcel Map (4) SFR Parcel Map & Design Review SUBTPM16981 & DRC2004-01170 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this protect is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances Please obtain proof of the available fire flow from CVWD. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Pnvate fire hydrant on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch number shall be displayed at the property entry E-, F ~~v • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) 1~ T Project File No.: Tentative Tract Maa SUBTPM16981 Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaap, Assistant Planner • Applicant: Steven Soies, Peter Bryan, Linda Bryan Date: March 15, 2005 . . .. . . . . ... . . Aesthetics The protect grading scheme shall be revised to eliminate CP B Review of plans C 2 all cut and fill and trenching, within 10 feet of the Eucalyptus globulus 'Blue Gum' tree trunks, including those of neighbor's land All on-site trees shall be pruned according to proper arborical practices Alternatively, the applicant may apply for a tree removal permit to remove trees subtect to replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculata'Spotted Gumtrees, 15-gallon I size, along south tract boundary If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it CP B Review of plans A/C 4 shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump site or Carped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing Iwe borer beetles or their larvae m trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 Air Quality All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good cP c Review of plans ac zia operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 1 of 8 .~ -. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer cwso c Review of plans c z shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed ca c Review of plans ac va performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rute 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards so s Review of plans ac z noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD so c Review of plans ac zia Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site ao c Review of plans ac zia through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads eo c Review of plans ac va Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO c Review of plans ac va areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed e0 c Review of plans ac va excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance so C Review of plans A a with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by eo c During A a the Cdy rf silt is carved over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind so c During A a speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils eo c During A a haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means v 2of8 • ~~ . . . .. . . . . .. ... . . The site shall be treated with water or other Bo c ounng construction A a soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and Bo c ounng conso-uchon A a RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean eo C Review of plans we a alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that eo c Review of plans we Zia construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be eo cio Review of plans c Zia regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be eo cio Review of plans c Zia required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources The protect grading scheme shall be revised to eliminate CP B Review of plans C 2 all cut and fill, and trenching, within 10 feet of the Eucalyptus globulus 'Blue Gum' tree trunks, including those of neighbor's land All on-site trees shall be pruned according to proper arborical practices Alternatively, the applicant may apply far a tree removal permit to remove trees subject to replacement planting with Eucalyptus maculata'Spotted Gum trees, 15-gallon size, along south tract boundary If any Eucalyptus wood is infested with borer beetles, it CP B Review of plans A/C 2/7 shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or larped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tarp edges with soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from re~nfesting other trees or wood The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live borer beetles or their larvae in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714 5 3of8 rn ,. ... ~. . . Cultural Resources If any prehistoric archaeological resources are cP B Review of report A/D 4 encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites cP/eo C Review of report A/D 3!4 from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish ds archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 of archaeological sites within new developments, using then special quahhes as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's cP/60 C Review of report ao s/a archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend cP/eo C Review of report aD 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, cP C Review of report ao 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a cP a Review of report wo a preconstruction field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mdigatwn measures (i e , paleontological mondonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped cP a Review of report ao a to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing achvities 4of8 ~0 s i • .. . ... ... . ... .. . . Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or Bo Bic Review of report ~ Nri a graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga oP ~ Review of report ~ 3 Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods The site shall be treated with water or other soil- eo C Dunng construction a a stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a eo C During construction a a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind Bo c ouringconso-uchon a a speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and eo c Dunng construction n a RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant t3o Bicio Review of plans ac va shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction achwhes entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 5of8 "1 p~ 'V .. ... ~. -. An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in so eiciC Review orphans ac zia grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing achwties are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site, as a result of this protect, will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame Dunng construction, temporary berms such as eo eiciC Revew of plans ac va sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street eo aiciD Review of plans ac zia cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Granular materials will be used at walkway areas ce aicio Review of plans A/C 2/4 The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in ce aicio Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by (name/date) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for eo aicio Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and mirnm¢ing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permds 6 of 8 • s • s s ~ .~ //~ lJJ .. ,.. . , ... Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall ce nicio Review of plans ac zia submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect descnphon and identifying Best I Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant eo r3icfo Review o(plans ac zra shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the 8o C During construction A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the r3o C During construction A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bulding Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early cP C During construction A A as possible in the first phase 7of8 Key to Checklist Abbrewatlons Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspechon 1 -Withhold Recordahon of Final Map CP - Cily Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWChon 0 -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWChon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Cerhficate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding OffiGal or designee D - On Complehon D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operahng 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 8 of 8 s s ~ RESOLUTION NO 05-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2004-01169, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE LOT W IDTH ON FOUR LOTS ON 2 43 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED 100 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND COUSINS PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1062-061-03 A Recitals 1 Steven Spies, Peter Bryan, and Linda Bryan filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2004-01169, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing on July 27, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place, and The property is presently undeveloped, and c Single-family residences bound the site on the north, south, east, and west Hellman Road is parallel to the east property line of the protect site and Cousins Place is parallel to the west property line of the protect site, and d The proposed Variance would reduce the requred 90-foot lot width on all four proposed parcels as follows Lot 1 - by 7 O6 feet, Lot 2 - by 7 06 feet, Lot 3 - by 7 29 feet, and Lot 4-by726feet e The parcels are within the Equestrian Overlay and are able to meet the required 70-foot horse corral buffer from neighboring habitable structures, with each lot exceeding the minimum regwred lot depth of 200 feet by 123 feet (323 feet total), and f Two lots will face Hellman Avenue and tpwo lots will face Cousins Place, and ~ ~ 9~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 05-65 DRC2005-01169 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code, in that it would create lots much larger than the existing lots in the surrounding area The proposed lots will be developed meeting all City development requirements for the specified zone except for lot width In fact, the lots will be 123 feet deeper than the regwred 200-foot lot depth Conversely, the literal compliance with 90-foot lot width requirement would create lots that are substantially larger in depth and width than the surrounding area, which is inconsistent with the obtectrves of the Development Code b That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district, in that the subdivision of the lot using the required 90-foot lot width would result in two lots that are much larger in width, depth and area than the other lots in the same zoning district, and c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract, in that it will allow the subtect parcel to be subdivided into lots that are of similar overall size and character to the lots in the surrounding neighborhood, and d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of speaal privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the newly created lots will be of similar lot area and meet all City development requrements for subtect zoning district except for lot width, and e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, in that the newly created lots will be of comparable lot area to the surrounding lots and will be developed meeting all other applicable City Code cntena 4 That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below C-, F~~o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No 05-65 DRC2005-01169 -SPIES, BRYAN, AND BRYAN July 27, 2005 Page 3 Plannino Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) Variance approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Richard Maaas, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of Juty 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES NOES ABSENT E, FC47 LJ RANCH O C I T Y U C A M O N C A Staff Report DATE July 27, 2005 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH - A request to develop a new 200,000 square foot worship center Including offices, meeting rooms, classrooms and retail shops on 33 50 acres In the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Avenue and White Oak Avenue - APN 0208-354-01 and 04 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North -Industrial Park (Subarea 7) -Private Hospital South -Industrial Park (Subarea 7) -United States Postal Service East -Industrial Park (Subarea 7) -Office Condominiums West -Industrial Park (Subarea 7) -Office buildings B General Plan Deslonatlons Protect Slte -industrial Park North -Industrial Park South -Civic Center Drive/Regional and Industrial Park East -Industrial Park West -Industrial Park C Site Characteristics The protect site is located on the north side of Civic Center Drive between Red Oak and White Oak Avenues The site is a vacant parcel with a slight slope of 2 percent The site will completely build out the remaining parcel of land east of Red Oak and White Oak Avenues Only one heritage tree exists on-site Other vegetation consists of small ruderal shrubs and grasses D Parkin Although the church campus includes a number of buildings, such as the Youth Center, small Chapel, and retail, the sole basis for determining required parking is the Item G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 2 sanctuary seating capacity, which is the most intensive use considered when calculating the number of spaces needed Number of Number of Fixed Parking Spaces Spaces Tvae of Use Seats Ratio Required Provided Sanctuary 3,500 1 per4fixedseats 875 1,141 ANALYSIS A General The project site is located on the site of what was originally intended as the corporate office centerpiece of the 200-acre Rancho Cucamonga Business Park master plan The former Angels Hospital is located to the north and a new industrial/office park to the northeast, a Kaiser medical office bwlding and the Cucamonga Postal Office is to the south, Industrial parks are to the east, and an office complex is to the west The proposed design scheme will create a large campus-like setting with the church buildings clustered and orientated along a mator axis The 3,500-seat main Sanctuary (there is also a separate, smaller Youth Sanctuary) is the focal point of the project Landscape berms rather than fencing or netting are used to keep balls within the sports field area (baseball and soccer) The entire protect also includes offices, retail buildings, classrooms, a separate chapel, and afellowship/ dining hall The project incorporates an extensive amount of recreation faalities for a church, including youth locker rooms, a swimming pool, a large tot lot facility with playground egwpment, and a large sports field, which will include baseball and soccer The project has a four-lane drive entry and three secondary entries The elevations include stacked stone detail with an emphasis on a large plaza area with a fountain as the main focal point The protect also incorporates columns, trellis features, decorative walkways, and pedestrian access B Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, McPhail, and Coleman) on June 14, 2005 At the June 14, 2005, Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant presented revised drawings in response to staffs comments, which included re-orienting the northwest parking lot for pedestrian accessibility and adding additional landscaping to the site The Committee reviewed the protect and recommended approval C Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study The staff completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that there could be significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality during the site preparation Such impacts would be caused by grading and equipment exhaust Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce the short-term air quality impact to aless-than-significant level The protect will also have an impact upon biological resources because of the proposed removal and possible relocation of one on-site heritage Oak tree If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH . July 27, 2005 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planrnng Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01244 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectful) ubmitted, ~ Brad- Buller City Planner BB EC\ma Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibd C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit O Exhibit P Exhibit O Draft Res • - Site Plans - Site Utilization Map - Landscape Plans - Overall Elevations - Street Elevation and Plaza/Vine Treatment - Courtyard Entrance - Grading Plans and Sections - Budding Details - Overall Floor Plans - Budding Elevations - Sanctuary Floor Plans - Separate Budding Floor Plans - Fire Access Plan - Topographic Plan - Line-of-Sight Plan and Cross Sections - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 14, 2005 - Initial Study Parts I and II olution of Approval for Development Review DRC2004-01244 ~3 ~~ -}' "~U~' E%ISTINO OFFICE DEVELOPMENT INDUST PARK 9UBAREA7 _J I ASP ~ _~ ~~ EXISTING RETAIL INDUST PARK SUBAREA T i f '~ „ ,. ., ~~ nililinlnlnnnlnllnnilnnnin nlilnnnlnonnnln ~ _ ~ ~H>4+U ~ ~ D ~ ~ - - A {}, ,Q Yy ,, d ~~ XSISTING OFFICE DEVELOPMENT %%~ I/S/~N//~D///~~UASTR PARK. ILLLLLCd EA7 e T _ ~~Il /( ~~ -'`"` ~) PM 10696, -_ ~ (NOT 11 P OR PI# C ~ M 10 5 ~ B ~RU 5T PARK 1REAlllll llll~ ~~ I , ..o ~ I .. _..._ -CNIC CENTER DRNE %~/' ~ / XSISTING KAISER %,I~ ~ INDUST PARK Sl EXISTING LIGHT INDSTRL DEVELOPMENT INDUST PARK SUBARFA7 o O EXISTING LIGHT INDSTRL ~ DEVELOPMENT / INDUST PARK SUBAREA 7 e ~, 1V111\ 1 V 11\ 1 CENTER APN#0208-354-01-0000 APN# 0208 354-04-0000 LV INGOT FAMII.Y CAL~ORNIA PACKAGE DRC#2004-01244 WLC o..~o. a 'o, ieo: no avvmw c aEU so m eruct-cow rmeerxwae~ wir OVERALL SITE PLAN ~.~«; A10 1 4 ,, ~5 ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ i I V ~ ll ,. i EILAXGED PMKNfi RAN (MK•K) I ~ I , ~=~ ..._.. / a m ~m / ~ ENWiOED PMKPlO RAN Pi i 1\li 1• MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208354-01-0000 APNq 0208354-04-0OOD FOR FAMINIIGY NT CHURCH CUCAIvf~ONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCg2004-01244 ~" WLC ,..• 10 ~I 0 1 i it Bi•; t•~~i' ,49 ,~^' 1p O'^I49 • p0191099 E0 PNM11M< Oml Mrt IEI AO KNEi-N-O M1OR NY®1 Wf! PARTIAL SITE PLAN AREA 3 ~, A13 Nr.W MINISTRY CENTER APNN 0208 350-0I-0000 APNN 0208-354-01-0000 FOR ABUNDANT LNING FAMH,Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALHORNIA I;UY PACKAGE DRpt2000-01244 J WLC auww.c csca rasa rnFi.w-o raecra~ a.. PARTULL SITE PLAN AREA 2 A12 • • • ® ~wrn.oa.~ ..n.. T a,,.q,~.... mo. ,.,. . ~......e.e...,av.... 7 ~ ~~ i I • ~ - ~ . ~. ~ ., •~~ /~ ~ ~-' , A I i .~ ~ D ~~~\ ;, I, i ~\~ .,,,~ ~ ~. e~ ° ,~ ~L .~ i y,~ 0'~ 0~ ~, I I If Y 'i 1 e NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNq 0208-354-01-0000 APNq 0206 354-04-0ODD FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY c.~t,n:oRNLa rr~~.nr+vn DRpt2004-01244 iaii. :',° is ~~•110~ io> iei'vn ~e ~~.~ a. PARTIAL SITE PLAN AREA 1 ~~ A11 FWa ~~ ~s ~3A ss Z~U ~~ ~a x o~ ~a~,~ ~Z~a ~ pp~~ 5a ZaaU .? ~Q~w~ a'U U V _ ~ z N C73 l' ~~s Fsa Q a h~'1 _ _ g ~ m ~ ~ . g F Ua o ..,,,... O u ~w ~ ~ x z ~ Q a$ a~1~ M~ / ~ _ 3 ~ 5 s C~~ra x~ ~ ~U a y ~~~ M~ _ .- _ Z U b ~W.z1 W m~~~ ~ a¢ U0.¢. v z~U ~~ ti¢.JwU ~U U "- ®11191!! ~s ~ e~~ liillililllililll~~~l~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~!!!!!!! !? ii~ ~ '~ ~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~Ilnmm~nmm~n}u}}®nnm t! ~i~~e ~ }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}III/Itl Y88 YI U9/1dY111}/p1YYlltl}}} '$~1~~ 1! 15 11 1 111 1 l 99l 1 1 1 1 u55 a 5w~~y w 5! l quq pmpgy5uqm555n5l wmm. l l5! (tl(tl 9S 7fi ~~i!i~iiii ~'1~~i~ll ~~YI ~~1 ~1 ~1~11~~/1~~~11~111111} lglblf~ }li d 11i,}ii}l} isi}I}`;i5prfi}}I'i~l' ~~1 liii'~ p i!}IIE~IIi}1}Ills{~~Ill~~illlil9iil~itl~l~e(~}I,Itlj 1 i ~~1~~lii~iii~~~ll~il~~~li~1~~~i~iii~i~ii~lii~iili~i~ - ~bb~~~~l~~l d I ® n. L~~ f c 8 ~ y s a _~a ~ n" O d ~ 71 V A -~ ~ ~ C g ~ a ~ u ~ g fi~ e s ?FN ~ ~~~ 1 =tli~ gS~ ~~~ 0 ~o= ., isaonnds ~ ., r- i I ~-~ "~ 4', e 1y~ L~ 3 i __ ~ - t c ~ a,' ~ ~ - ~.'. i 1 . 9 ~ _ r , ,, - ~~~ 0 @ ~-_L- ~~„~ ~,,. Gil NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp 020&359-01-0000 APNp 020&354-0C-0000 ABUNDANT F~ QGY CHURCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCp2009-0I291 ~~ WLC ::~ o .~ ...~ conceptual landscape plan area 1 ~° L1.1 ----• -- - i ---- - i - -- - o- ~. /~ ~0~96P .~~ ~._ s ~~~ ~._. . -- .~ _ ^~~ ~~ W :_ ~a '~ , . ~__ ~~, r7'oiE~' .W __ i~ B$ srs ex.~ Vie- :~ _~._ :W ~.=t ~s...e:W == crr izx c3 -= s ~ --ec ;W ea m,_ga ~~ ~m..w~ ..... m.e~ -- i \ f~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ • ~ - - --- ~ ., O _. .. - --i al I I I u ~ i i ICE 1 T I , _ ~. _ ~- - --------- - - - - - ~ ~~ _ - - __ - CIVIC CENTER Dl:?IV_Er- - -- - --_ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ _ _ ~ r ~ _ _ __ ~ a~l~ v _ ~~~ __ r ._.- _ _ ~ ~ 5rw'a= l~ 48 3~ _ _ o-.e..~.. _~,. _ 1>W "ea ~~ ~ ~I- ra ®~I® _ 8'~°r'r' _- - Bran ~,.r.~.... moR __ .._ ~ iO.M ~r .s ~ _.. ~r.e ~__ .I ~. .~. MINISTRY CENTER APNN 02 0 8-3 5 4 014101p APNA0208-3540441000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING CHUR H ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - , - CUP PACKAGE DRCg2004-01244 ~, , _ , -_ I~cmd D.,~~G~ LP W T~\/^) u+t a vcxr ~- ~ 1 1J t/ - - ~ - .~ .,.,~~~ e..a:e: _ '.Il l.rnl• SI R: ne~a CU V•'OeO• ~~~~v~ ,.. euo eea •eso vicwnv m,v on..x.,sa oECxom w,c m,.ae ecu , -xn rwhcrrueae air conceptual landscape plan area 2 L~.2 - ~,.i r~~ - 7 e ~ _~ i ~ ~ i C ~2, `~ - < ~. _ '2~ _ ~~ i \ - .~Jf -~ ~ - _ z \ . ~ - , ~ ~ . ~ / ,Z . ' ' / ~ n` ` Fy .~ `\ - - / 1 f ~ ` ~~'~', ~/ y ~ / . ~ ``~ `l ~~ / J '~ , / i .~~. ~~ _.___ .. __. _ ®-~..~. rw~ .W ~..~ .~.~. ~ ~_ .~ ,,.._e t g`r~~ ._._. _.._ _.,_ _ ~~:s i£c "s5 3~ rx ' ~T ~ ~~ ~~ ~ " If3?iC 160' [d ®~t~ ."~ ':~• :z m~i~ J ~ Y 0~~~ / ~m~T... ed oR EXISTING DEVELOP llrr', INDU/7//S~/7/T//~//P~ ~~ox®nvouve v~cv+rrr mne M 1~ STRY CENTER APNN 020&3540I-0(100 APNp 0208-351-01-0000 LIVQJG v CHL7RCH RANCI-IO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA YAI:KAIiI; DRCY72004-01241 WLC .:::: R ~~~e CU~ ~en0• ~~ ~ •e) OY,O• •'eou eea •eeo vuwr conceptual landscape plan area 3 °~ L1.3 6' '~' d a.ev~nm+uarws wm v~is EAST ELEVATION MEW MINISTRY CENTER APN#0208354-01-0OOD APNq 0208-354-04-0000 FAOBUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCN2009-01244 'n U I- I!•. WEST ELEVATTON SOUTH ELEVATION WLC „~,.,. ., +oi {eo s °'BE ua rumor r.~i-m-o crna~aea a .a OVERALL ELEVATIONS A51 1 •e®®®®®® a ®® ® - RED OAK STREET ELEVATION 7 I >~ ___ __ ~~ ___ Q ~ iE ~ m _ ~ 1 ~r i e .. ® ~.~ y . ~ ~ :! i ~ i • p! i! i r~ i ,,..-i i = ® a a 4 1. ' _ ~ i. __ ® ~ ~~ a i / E ~ .. ~~. ~'^ @ v '~ i ~...~.~. _ ~ a a ___ ____ _ ______ __ ____ _ ___ _~___ ~ - e NP l 1~`~~ ENLARGED PLAN 3 PLA7A ENLARGED PLAN y NEW MINISTRY CENTER APN# 0208 354-01-0000 APN# 0208-354#0000 ABUNDANT LIVING CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRC#2009U1244 IOi"1~~19i~' B'I 11~1 Mil •~~i. f~l)1 ~11)~ f0f 1!11919 •uww«_c ovx. ..d~~ •,. STREET ELEV AND PLAZA ENLARGED PLAN A1.7 .. T V ® om.. .+~.s® { ~~ ~.r. \ ~•~ LUJ ~ w~ •_v , .. ^ .... F e ______~ _________ L SECTION OF MONUMENT SIGN . '/ PLAN OF MONUMENT SIGN . 3 PLAN OF TRASH ENCLOSURE . 7 ,,,'. ~•-- ~~. ~- s.:... _. _- : _ IlWNF1F0.i ~MIMIYO~MI ' NOT USED S ELEVATION OF MONUMENT SIGN 1 ELEVATION OF TRASH ENCLOSURE y 6i q7 ~ d NOT USED 8 SECTION OF TRASH ENCLOSURE . S i~ ~ s = T ~ I G~7 I I I I I ® L J F ' _ ! _ ( ---~ ~ ~ NOT USED 10 ENLARGED ELEVATION . S ELEVATION OF COURTYARD ENTRANCE 7 ~ NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-35401-0000 APNp 0208-3541M40000 FOR ABUNDANT CH JRCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DACp2009-01244 WLC i ou r are rESFm r..~ eroici •w®F a SITE DETAILS A14 ~ Q~ ll ~F ss ~~rU ~~ ~ U $ i~ F~ -_ _ .- ,~ U ~ u, aaV U V 0. v I~~ ; yl~~ ! ~ !~; ~ ,~~ g'9~ ° ~ 7 9~ jE ~~~ .! E;I ;~ ~pi~ v' 11x1 ~~ ~}!8 ~~ 1!~ 5 ~ ml .i 419 ~! ~~i3 ~~+ G ~ ~~~ o ~ ! ~ ~ oZ~ ~ gU a ~ ~ ~ 'e~ ~c yB "~~ as ~ a ~~ e ~ r IZ i et I` 1 to ~~ ~d`I ~ ~9 !~ 11 1E i ~ ~~ s~ ;~ p ~ ~~' ~ ~I ~ ~ S! ~ ' R'! ~ 1 e + I ~ ~ ~ '8 !a ~ 0, I ~ ~ f 4 a1 4 A 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6° I a 1~ si~ ' ~~ ~ !~ 1 ~ to : I ~' ~ g~e t 1 ° c ale !~ ' ~ = i ~ +'! ~ '~ Q S Y ~y 9 g p ~ B :~~ ~~g! ~ i` i~ ~ 3~1 ~~ g~l'I ~~ Eg~tl i° t~tII I [4 ~'g ~ ~~ ~~ 9' ~~~ E ~ !pl E ~9 ~ II g oE~Ig E ~ .~ ! a ~8 ~, = i 4.~ Rt; E E~i ~d ! 9.(~ IR !I ~! !i~ 5 j iE~ ; '~ ~ ;! . e g i111. I. I ~ ~ ,. = 1 ° ~ ° ~1 ~9 i=~'6~9~ i ~~ it i !1't 9 P ~ ° !i Itl; ~ al °~ ~~I I, al ia~ ~~ 1I~ :1 ~I lay ~ e~ ~~~' 11 @ o 'I at! °•01l~tl! ~ °Y~ 1~ ~ {'~ l9~9 ;E1y~ 9~ ~if l1~~ ~YI9g ~E~ i° ~° ipps ~~ ~0 3~ ~EE EEppp~p !e ~, ~E8 9g ~p` ~ i' ~tl ~!~ l6QY! ~ ~0 ~~~ tl~~'~I pa° Q f~+ /!II ~li [.' +4 ~'A~ ~ +gt 71 e1 it~ 7Y ip =~ tl !1 m A~ +!!. + t a s: + s! 6 c t tl u tle i+e tlx tl° tl tl° tl tll tll tl 7 tl° tla c tl I (v ~e`~~1~! ila aaaaaaaa~3~ +~ e9 4 ~~sl l9~ ~ylg4 ~ !~!~ to 19;~~~~, °i .I l4.I~o91 I~ m~ ® s"~:.m~ ~nm...~ o®e ~ ..e.e m~ ®~._____ o~ o~ e o ~, a ~ ~.. ®~.. o ®.. o ®... :~~~o.,.... a. HdRiFdflC ~.e~ - ~. ~~4.® ~~ ~~JLi'.°ffiC~ ~~~ ®= -- 1 oa..,~ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN AREA 1 0. CZ NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-35pO1-0000 APNp0208-351-01-0000 rv~~ FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUY PACKAGE DRCp2000.012M ~~ x.3. WLC 7::'. ;:; :Sl ;i~~ cu na a a ~~ C.~..~.r re,- ~~ O96~C tlOIIS mY'°.°. aZ°.: m aAr .. m®e ®w :~ d~ m~ .® .®~ e;e a®._--- o~ - a~ - o~~~. o~ o~- ~_ ate. - . NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNN 020&751-01-0000 APNk 020&754-00.0000 f1DUl~lJl11~ f LrvING FAMII,Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PACKAGE DRg2004-0I7M WLC a~~>m .~..~~ . CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN AR(E~A 2 nM.0. ^~.1 • } m® ,_ e. m® ~~ mom. ._ ~~..~~ m~° ~ m~ sue.... e~ e...sr m® .~~. e®- s s so. s~ s ore o~ o _ o~ o~ r 9~ e® ~ =om.sr Omn ® ~ vrvr~..mn Owe ~ O ms~e O ~v ~~\ ewer <araa wr"e1°r~w-~~ " JBdILIFBIG ,~ N . o ~ ~ -C'A77iw ~.- ... ,, , r ~~.~~_ ~~~~ NEW MINISTRY CENTER nrNao2oe-3sa91.ooao APNq 020&354-04-0900 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII.Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCg2004-01241 3 ~r WLC ~I~ 'tr.,. ~ ;;.... ~~,,,.,, ,,, ,,s, „,.,,., , ~.,.~ d,. CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN AREA3 .°^~ C2.3 NEW MIAIISTRY CENTER ArN#ozoRaSe-0i-0oao APN#0208-35404-0800 sECnow .-~ ~y V SECIIOR E-E d ~ SECfIOR F-F sECnoR R-a ~Y LIVING FAMII,Y CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRC#1006012M WLC YID Ir lr Lr. L..r ur~r n.ulu n.r r...r. [.~.... omn.ar nm vii i::~~ iii iii iiii re ~,~ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN SECTIONS .~: C2.4 cECnaw c-c SECTd~ 0-0 s s ~W MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-354-01-0000 APNN0206-336-01-0000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH SECTION A-A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL~ORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRG{2004-01244 'Sn~ n SECTION B-B W LC •"1~10~ If14'I I'!0 SECTION C-C PM C MR f[~R~ A]IIRMNP• nF OVERALL SECTIONS A5 6 C OHVAIIW D8fA0.4 R6f 101/AIJ EAST ELEVATION NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp O'l0&354-01-0000 APNp 020&354#OIgO FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PACKAGE ortcazaowlzu ~~ .~.J I -- - _ - - r ----• ~ : NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WLC ~.,. ~. :R''t 9 C' : 5,1. 'x.18; :.' 9::: ow w,E mm rHSi.m-o rwuo.rsx am ELEVATIONS VINE TREATMENT ~. Lt4 -, NEW MIDHSTRY CENTER APNp 0208-35401-0ODD APNp0208-354-040000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII.Y CALIFORNIA rrdL,L~rLVn DRCM2004-01244 HEAD DETM I ~~.. 1121 HEAD DETAL I ~w.ee 1131 HEAD DETAIL I ~u.r. 18 I WINDOW DETAIL ,~d I I ~ I I HEAD OETNL .v+. 9 SLL OETAL ~.-.. 1B 8LL DETAL ~ e 14 SILL DETAL ..r-.. 10 HEAD DETAIL o...n. I e I SECTION WINDOW DETAIL a ~~' 8~~0 9,['0'9009 '91 ,~, 19 A 4 pNNN C dEIX MR i E(6 0f lE IMELIN.NBI ql! BUILDING DETAILS A15 (sT, m ~ ~ Y _ ^ e T1 P ~ H 4 /-~e 5~ele5y~e~ ~_~ ~ ~~' \\ r-f`~ ~,.~ ~• i I ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I - - r ~ -_e _ ~~ 4 t I ~~r\I -- u I~ ~ s - oo am + -- _ ~ ®oo \~~ ~, -~ ~ ~ ea I _ A ~ ~'=~ 1 ~~~ I J F~ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ ______________ __ _ _ ~__ 7~ - ---- ---, a o ~ a ' - E ,- - - I _ C _ ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ I -- I -- -- -- I p _ __ u _~ I I e n I ' I I v s I " 0 e r___ .. _ a__a-~ __ __ ~ e 0 °~ - - - 9 p---- - ~, - M ISTRY CENTER APNK 0209-35d-01-0DUU LIV LLVV FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PACKAGE DRCg2004-01244 +i, va i. o.~ai i~~i 'oa in ysos as aeo owx~wic uEn MR FFl S4 YNII-i0-0 rroiaxusu am OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN oa+ww ~ .~ ~~ Y w~ '.~' NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNR 0208-354-01-0000 APNN 0208354-04-0000 LIVING FAMILY ~~.iFOi~y rr14.,i~vn DRCiF2004-01244 WLC it Bi~O ..~ t.,. °;,1. w.~~ an .mom .~~ -:o-o ~~a a OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN .~ S` _V .} y NORTH NEW MII~TISTRY CENTER APNN 0208-354-01-0000 APNg0208-354-04-0000 FOR ~~ CHURCH RANCxo CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA EVATION CUP PACKAGE DRpt2004-01244 ~~ /~ ~ O W LC WEST ELEVATION sotrrx ~A ~ Ai CNMBt p4 e BUILDING A ADMINISTRATION ELEVATIONS ~"° AA51 ~~ 'S~ NEW MINISTRY CENTER ArNa o2oa-ssaoi4%100 APN90206-356-01-0000 ABUNDANT F ~ G A MII Y CHURCH EAST ELEVATION RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCM2009-01244 NORTH ELEVATION W L C WEST ELEVATTON ~o~ro Lei i •; •r~i• v119 {'BO OMMeMC OEPc RfNMq Y BUILDING C CHAPEL ELEVATIONS SOUTH ELEVATION ~~^ AC5 1 e...,d~ EAST ELEVATION NEW MINISTRY CENTER APN710208 354-01-0000 APNq 0206-354-00-0000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING CH~CH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCIi2004-01244 NORTH ELEVATION ..L~ 04 WEST ELEVATION SOUTHELEVATTON WLC il[^~• IBi~: ai„~ 091 , °nS1 ioa+°o °ue'o a o.re~.nm c.1E ~n •~-a rlmrtcrwem n BUILDING D CHILDREN ELEVATIONS AD51 • • oaet~ EAST ELEVATION NEW MI1~iISTRY CENTER ~rNa ozos 15/-01-0000 APt4q 0208454-04-0ODD FOR ABUNDANT LIVING CH~CH RANCxo CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCtl2004-01244 .~.) _9 NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION A.« x SOUTH ELEVATION W LC 0o veo wuvx c o..e omw swE Ve.i o vmecrrwa, war BUILDING E ADULT ELEVATIONS ~, AE51 EAST ELEVATION NL' W MINISTRY CENTER APNq 0208 356-01-0(100 APNg0208-354-04-0000 rvx ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Q NORTH ELEVATION ~,... _. WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION I:UY PACKAGE DRpi2009-0!244 W LC _i a,..M~,~ ~Q. iA IDJ CVE i/C-I P IIOI[Cf1I.M91 p~~ BUILDING H DINNING HALL ELEVATIONS ~.:~ AH5 1 NEW - MINISTRY -'° --- _ m CENTER °' ,4rNaozae3saolmoo _ ~- APNM 0208 35/-04-0000 • ~'~~~ by ~ ~`~ ~~~ ~j~ ~ m _.,,,. ~ ~ i ~ ~ '~ FOR i.:= ANT ~ ~ m"~"~ - EAST ELEVATION CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL~ORMA .... -• CLIP PACKAGE DRpt2004-01214 m ~1 f .\ NORTH ELEVATION ~~ ~ ^ ~~'1 ~ WEST ELEVATION v ®' i:~y.,i o.,.i ei i 1-N r. u...1.,` 7fd"a "~"r17 °eo° wx vAC 4 R~AO OWE ~R •~ 0 me ~e BUILDING M MAINTJSTORAGE ELEVATIONS SOUTH ELEVATION ~ AM5 1 ons,~~s EAST ELEVATION NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-354-01-0000 APNp 0208 354#0000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING CIiU~RCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCk2009-01249 W ~ o~o` J~' NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION WLC ++,. aiie ~i n e^a ., ,. IPiS'n9, ner i?eo +os >eo SOUTH ELEVATION www. wir. resew ~Ve-~ o rwrtncrxwem a BUILDING R RETAILS ELEVATIONS AR51 --~ CN l~ WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WLC r., ~i "rn~i~`ii e. i . ioe ieo iieo .nc aca a~,re~m ~ w.F rrn ~ o rwmxra w.a BUILDING S SANCTUARY ELEVATIONS :.;; AS5 1 r~`J Vv .._. EAST ELEVATION ,... NORTH ELEVATION NEW MINISTRY CENTER nrNpoxae3sa of aooo APNp 0208354-01-0000 FOR AsuxnAxr LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCp2004-01244 W LC f'.i_::':i: i ~~.~ a~ .o,~. ,u,E,n ~- nom.~wum wow BUILDING V YOUTH ELEVATIONS ~. AY51 • s • s. ~~ ~u~ ~ ~~ 0 W (.~~ io illii,~t,~~,'~ q 1+ t it, ar ~u i. _i ~~ M~INWISTRY CENTER Aer~a o2osasa.oi-0ooo APNa 0208-354-00-0000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII.Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA =I PACKAGE DRCa2WC-01244 iil W LC ~, ~ ~a~i~ F::°~i ' i i d. ' ' i ~ ioi eo i • ' - - --- -- ~ owc oa~w wc mcua i " L ~~ 4~6 BUILDINGS SANCTUARY 1ST FLOOR PLAN ~ AS2 1 . NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNk 0208-351-01-0000 APNR 0208-356-01-0000 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII,Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA W CUP PACKAGE DRCN2004-01214 WLC .ii ~r .: i~~li ei.a ,. ` tfie 711 Ini ieo iieo onwxnc o~. V.R Ml]® YML]lIl I MY6TNMR b BUILDING S SANCNARY 2ND FLOOR PLAN AS2 2 s ~/ r ~ J M INISTRY CENTER APNN 0308 J34-0141011D APNk 0208 754-09-0ODII ABUNDANT F ~ G A MII Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCg2004-01244 WLC io~~a ei.a ?+oe ieo reo orvwxw~c ara an rteaaoe eru~~A ~ N rxosa KVeen aim BUILDINGA ADWIINISTRATION FLOOR PLANS m""° AA21 SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN n~w`J W NEW MINISTRY CENTER ArNao3oeasdoi-0ooo APNM0308-334-04-0080 ABUNDANT FAA IIGY CHURCH CUCAMONGA, CALiFORNtA CUP PACKAGE DRCg2004-01244 WLC a~ie ~r:°.°•i~ i•i ~f.+o> 1q~e ~+os o+ aoo eo +veo awwc nca an ree eam vise in ~ o N woxcrxveee wm BUILDING C CHAPEL FLOOR PLAN • ~. AC21 FLOOR PLAN 'W ~ NEW NIINISTRY CENTER nrNa ozoeasaolmoo APNM 0208-334-00-0000 ABUNDANT FA IIGY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRG02004-01244 WLC ~.•p. ouzo e~° i:ni'~.°i: ~~~i°°i ~1~ iei° anxx+nc omi an rf~~aae ~wein ~ o N BUILDING D CHILDREN 2ND FLOOR PLAN AD2 2 NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNq 0208-ON-01-0000 APNk 0308 33d-0C-0000 '~~.DJ N FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII,Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORATIA CUP PACKAGE DRCX2004-012M WLC e:i~~~.:ii:n ei ~e °ii u.'i Ali roe sn ~o~ uo + wwxw.c owc wrz wm riu in ~- naecrxva air BUILDING D CHILDREN 1ST FLOOR PLAN AD21 i ~ • --~ NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-354-01-0000 APNp0308-334-06-0000 ABUNDANT FAA IIGY CHURCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCp2004-01244 WLC ,;.:e.,~.::~,.~;~.: :,: ,;, ~~,e, io+ 9eo +ien auvm~.-.c wrae Y'.R RITR ~WLI/B i-0 N runme aro BUILDING E ADULT FLOOR PLANS r a AE2 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNq 0208-351-01-0000 APNM 0208354-04-0000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII.Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCM2009-01244 (~''` ~nF.",' w N WLC o... i... •,~90f 9099[0 OYWX'MC~ OiO.. MR f£1 A ~-0 RR)CR NME0. Y BUILDING H DINNING HAIL FLOOR PLANS °'9..E'° AH21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ~ ~-+ -~ W FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND PLAN NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNq 0208 356-0!-0000 APNq 0208 334-06-0000 ABUNDANT FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCp2004-01244 WLC 0'14'4.11'14' BI~C 409 vl~il~ MIMMM~ MlE iEli Y'NE~A'~ L N 41U11R IU4lW M BUILDING M MAINT /STORAGE FLOOR PLANS AM21 NEW MINISTRY CENTER APN# 0208354-01-0000 APF4# 0208-354-04-0000 ni iF m ~er~a m ur.~v. ~F=F ~mcn ~ urnv. ~o =F ® «s m wo :F wo m `N SF D :! ~~ T F _____e ___e __ __a___.8 ___~_.. o. _o____ o_______ FIRST FLOOR PLAN N ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ., ~.. PACKAGE DRC#2004-01244 WLC ~. i. e... i..., ao'a 'aeo iieo www.c aE« d,E mm ~Ve-~-o revecrxwau wie BUILDING R RETAILS FLOOR PLAN AR21 ~..a.~ ~ r~ V • NEw MINISTRY CENTER ArNa ozoe-754-01-0000 ,~eNa ozoa-SSaoaaooo FAOBUNDANT FA IIGY CHURCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNUI CUP PACKAGE DRCa2004013N WLC 4~+10^ II e~.a n~+Iill+ 99+ I• ,p9 9 E ~ 4 ++eo r+eo auww~ omc an romm w+ew ~-o N p1 BUILDING Y YOUTH 1ST FLOOR PLAN AY21 NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-35C-01-0000 APNd 0308 35I-01-0000 FOR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMII.Y CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCp3004-01349 '~J ('~ ~O W LC N ownm.ic o~ac MR Rl~ tYI.I /L I-0 T]ICIMMiA q BUILDING Y YOUTH 2ND FLOOR PLAN AY2.2 • ! ~ T 3 ~i~ /P sjC i5':1 I ;~ f ~~ ~- \ ~ ~I 1~ ,... -. ~~~ ~~' ,C _ ~~~ p ALL ON 9iE FIRE aCLESS ROPD IS NOt i0 ExCCfO 12R w GRADE ME ANGIE OF OEPPRTURE AND aPPftOACH I$ NOi iD E%CEEO 20¢ - ~~j~ / BVILDWG -5 MLL DE EWIPPED 'MiH CU551 STANDPIPES Ex PCi - ~ . LOCALIONS MLL BE DELERMINED BY LHE RCEPO DURING PLAN p CHECK A~ sLLOwPBLE PREA ULCVLPiIONS 'MLL BE PgONDED BY NU PRCHNECiS FOR PLAN CHECK RENEW NtC ARCNIiECi2 IS \\\\111 RESPONSBLE FOR MEETING THE REWIFEMEHTB OF THE 2001 U BURRING CCOE CHAPiEft 5 . I y~~,~ ~ _ ,f ~V/ / // ~ GS YDI ` -- :' ~ 44"~l~~t/r/rfhi~Nnir>T~ o a ~: ~ , '- i ~''' ///,~ 0 N...P ~i ... a.s: 1~N NEW MIlVISTRY CENTER APN# 0206-J54-01-0000 APN# 0208-354-04-0000 ABUNDANT LIVING CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRC#2004-01244 W LC ~a.le :; E.. ,:~, ~t~15~ ~d. {Pl~,a,.10e ar o, r area w rcr Liuae~ w m r _ FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS PLAN M ~ Al 6 3 i`' Y YI ILA Z ~ J ,~ W algy[y IGCMp a~ ~- azaal wont m~io°u..lil P1'"1gX0" o Q~.i ~e..~~s NEW MINISTRY CENTER APNq 020&750-01-0000 APNM 020&350-04-0000 LArvU~NIGANT CHAURCH CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PACKAGE DRCK1004-01244 "TRL~~ WLC YID ~.~. I... I~..r ;I I,I f.~1~111 II.. .~.~.,.. LIIIVW ,1111 IISI ..~, I,p rL~u~,n ~,n TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~. - as Syr e e a ~» ~® `~ ..1 MINISTRY CENTER APNp 0208-354-01-0000 MN# 0208-354-04-0000 ABUNDANT FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CUP PACKAGE DRCp2004-012M ~evlra WLC 1V i1 W MIMSTRY CENTER ~rNamoaasa olmoo APNp@0&334#0000 v , O cNOSS sECnoN /F1 FoR ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CACKAGE DRC#2004-012H ~~ 1 - /1' ~...~ ~~`Ti W LC r..,. ;..,.~,~ ,~.. u ~~~~ - LINE OF SIGHT CROSS SECTIONS EXHIBIT .~. C4 0-A i CRO'S SECTION r~1 CROSS y000N B ~ sECnon rc1 .t~. - • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 20 p m Emily Cameron June 14, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244 - ABUNDANTLIVING FAMILY CHURCH - A request to develop a new 200,000 square foot worship center including offices, meeting rooms, classrooms, and retail shops on 33 50 acres, located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Avenue and White Oak Avenue - APN 0208-354-01 and 04 Desion Parameters The protect site is located on the site of what was originally intended as the corporate office centerpiece of the 200-acre Rancho Cucamonga Business Park master plan The former Angels Hospital is located to the north and anew industrial/office park to the northeast To the south is a Kaiser medical office building and the Cucamonga Postal Office To the east are industrial parks To the west is an office complex The proposed design scheme will create a large campus-like setting with the church buildings clustered and orientated along a ma/or axis This axis is the central "court of palms" plaza that is the size of a football field to provide ample space for parishioners to fellowship before and after `''° services The 3,500-seat main Sanctuary (there is also a separate, smaller Youth Sanctuary) is the focal point anchoring the westerly end of the "court of palms " Landscape berms, rather than • fencing or netting, are used to keep balls within the sports field area (baseball and soccer) Both the swimming pool and the children's outdoor playground will be enclosed by an 8-foot high decorative wall Pre-Apolication Review This protect was twice reviewed by the Planning Commission, most recently on December 8, 2004 (see attached minutes) Three major concerns were raised by staff 1) neighborhood compatibility (i a ,buffering and sports field location), 2) traffic circulation/access and 3) architecture One of the significant changes since then is the relocation of the sports fields from the northwest comer to the southeast comer of site to provide more parking closer to the sanctuary Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues None -the applicant has diligently worked with staff Secondary Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1. At the Pre-Application Review the Commission responded favoreblyto the applicant's intent to preserve the existing lone Oak tree, however, it is not shown on Conceptual Landscape Plan 2 Replace Crape Myrtle trees with a more appropriate broad canopy trees to maximize shading of the north parking lot While great as a flowering accent, Crape Myrtles are too small to meet the design goal of shading at least 50 percent of pavement surface Also, the tree palette should match the other parking lots for cohesiveness of the church campus • 3. Re-orient the parking rows in a north-south direction m the north parking lot so that parishioners have the most direct access possible without having to walk between cars Tcx~-~b~t p G5 i DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH June 14,2005 Page 2 4 Add shade trees in the following areas at a rate of one tree per every three parking stalls 1) along the south edge of the north parking lot (if the parking lot is not re-oriented) to continue the tree pattem within the parking fields, and 2) along the east edge of the southeast parking lot to continue the tree pattem within the parking fields 5 Plant Honey Locust trees along the west side of the north entrance drive to match all other entry drives 6 Limit monument signs at protect entries to one per street frontage per Sign Ordinance Although up to three walls are allowed, none are shown, however, a combination of wall and monument signs shall not exceed four 7 Prowde an on-site directional sign program throughout the site to lead parishioners and visitors to the various ministry areas These signs should be architecturally compatible 8 Prowde articulation (i a ,horizontal movement of wall planes) along the north, south, and east sides of the Maintenance Bwiding These elevations are visually prominent along W hate Oak Avenue Likewise, add windows on the east side to enhance Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion • 1 Provide decorative pavement treatment at all entrance driveways, behind the right-of-way line Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval subtect to revisions prior to scheduling for Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner Emily Cameron The applicant presented revised plans addressed staffs recommendations, exceptforthe Oaktree The applicant requested permission to replace in kind The Committee recommended approval and agreed to allow replacement of Oak tree in kind • G5a ~ • ~_._r ~ -__ a Weil' II " I cr-~ _ 1 - DSta hon. _DU II II M II ' _ 3~ S M1 ~ '~ 11 I ~ I I IC 1 ~ IUIfl "~` men ~• I : ' • Y II / II II /3O7 a ~ _ . ;: , "j~ , I -ma ~'7 ~~/ ' ~ /~ '_' _ ~~ a - ~i r _- `i _ ` ^~ T y II ~/~.t ~I \9/J R Qac__ ~ ._ / / I u i II u G ~ II e N II a ~/2)O ~ / m `~ ~ - ~ HURL ` EO I __ _ I N ...: ~~_~~e~~ ~~~~~_.. ~~~{7~==~-^~ ~_-~~ _ ~a ~ y} / w C}I=~`1350~ F I--~/ t t t : t % : I __ _ •• II n II Y ~ ` n ,' .1€ -1 /~ ~n / - i _______a ~t li 1250 /! u W -~/ ~_ / II II I W ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ -~~~ > II - ~~~_ -=a II -I230 II ~ a n ~ C A ~~~ -, )i - Q 11 I ~ e . 1 I ff ...o. ... _~~ .~'_ 1 _ • BM b 120g 0 ~ 6fi ° n ~ I ° " N~ ~ ~~ railer l a. 1 I n x L ilt ] ~ X1190 ---- ~__vs~ II d-P' ~ ..-.... 1111 { ~ O W Igo _ =_____.... _ - I I I x I e o - -I ilo I I //]a- ~i AS '~i 1 II a u . .. 1 _~i ..e.. 1 Oft ~ 1 • II 1 In6 l~ - _ - .. 1 _ I ~ t ,,,L Ik, I, .~ ~ ~.. p, . . ..' ~ s ~ ~ ~.. • u i -qap NTF i FE . .. . y. ...:. .:...:.. :.... . AT EKA N • - ~"' ~'%'= _ t ii sT ~ Rochester - _ - - __- ~~_ ___ I ___________I _______ _ ______ __ __ _ ________ a__ _ _____ ___ _ ____ D _ __ - ___ :rv01 ~ n II 11 - u -~1 /oo ~ - _ _ ~~ i ~ n 11 n oso ,Well u II -" u - Q 0 e n I e /J o I - 14 1 ea s- s. s " /ogo u It/ ~ - Well' ~~" ______--...=m ,~~ ~ -~ a ~ II r_____ 'Well 1 I I _- +~- O /~-~ ~ II )O Q / II II II II >c E ~ O50 u I ~ /050 1 p ~~ n I /050 F r _ - _ ~~/ Well. p I - CORP - ~ R DINO f SAVE RANCHO I CIICA _ BOUN~AR ° '` 11 -~ II P ,~0 `D \ n ~. ~ \\ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DWA"Y ~ ~ . J •; 123 /oao ~ ~ ~~~- _ ~.~ - ~ ~4i` -`- ~ a li T _ Iq - =_ _ -- I ater I ~~~ ank © ~/ f l~nE A _ vv w G h - ~ vo~ - • ~ g]L~53~_ 9~ - -- - ~ .h ~ _ ---- t~ - 96) _ _ _ 9 - a)f ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Crty of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print c~tarly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line ) Planning D~nsion fsos> an-z~so The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed 'project so thatthe City may review the project pursuantto City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; .and the City's Rules-..and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested'iri this _ . ';' application be provided in full. ~ - `~: =~~ " .~ J ~ 'i Protect Tdle New Ministry Center -Abundant Living Familv Church Name & Address of pro/ect owner(s) Abundant Llvlnq Famlly Church 9239 Utfca Avenue, Swte 120 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name & Address o/ developer or protect sponsor same as owner Contact Person & Address BOb Caro 9239 Utica Avenue, Suite 120 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name & Address of person prepanng this form (if different from above) Susanto Agustiadf W LC Architects, Inc 10470 Foothill Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number (909) 987- 0909 ext 2211 EnvlronmentallnfoForm doc Page 1 of 11 ~ 5 ~- Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM r1 ~J INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It is the responsibility o/the applicant to ensure that the application is complete a[ the hme of submittal, Ciry staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing mlormahon Appkcahon Number for [he pro/ect to which this /orm pertains ~~C ~"" ~~~/~~ In/ormahon indicated by an asterisk (') is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Prowde a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Prowde a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site Irom the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site Irom the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of signif~can[ features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Protect Locanon (describe) Civic Center Drwe (east of Red Oak Avenue) City of Rancho Cucamonga 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) 0208-354-01-0000, 0208-354-04-0000 'S) Gross Site Area (acJsq tt) 33 50 '6) Net Site Area (total sde size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) 29 80 Acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the prolect sde (attach adddional sheet if necessary) Not Applicable 8) Include a descnpbon o/all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes in order [o fully implement the prolect Planning Department Buildmg and Safety Department Fire Department, Grading and Entitlement 9) Describe the physical setting of the sde as it exists before the prolect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any ex~shng structures on sde (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant /eatures described In addition, cite all sources o/information (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, tratrc studies) The prolect sits within the Civic Center master plan area The properties surrounding the prolect are almost completely developed including office space to the west, retalVrestaurant, hotel and hospital space to the north light industrial to the east and a medical office building to the south The site's topography has been previously mass graded when the Civic Center area was Initially developed and Civic Center Drive, Red Oak and White Oak Avenues were constructed Currently the site has a gentle, uniform slope from north down to south and is covered with natural grasses There Is a single mature olive tree at the mid-point of the south p/r~operty line which Is proposed to be relocated on the EnrtronmenlallnfoForm doc Page 2 of 11 1 _ Gj~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM ~ ~ site There are no existlng structures on the site 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or histoncal aspects of the site Cite all sources of in/ormation (books, published reports and oral history) There are no known cultural or historical asprects to the site in Its present state 11) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (airoraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses There are no known noise sources which will have an affect on the site. 12) Descnbe the proposed prolect in detail This should provide an adequate descnpt~on of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result /rom the proposed prolect Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent o/ development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) it necessary The prolect is a Christian Church complex complete with assembly, worship, educational, office and recreational spaces The prolect Is Intended to be constructed in a single phase and is anticipated to be complete for occupancy within the next two years int during or after construction o A school and Daycare are in the overall plan at some p /// yyy Env~ronmentalinfoFOrm doc Page 3 of 11 1 -: 5~ Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM The protect is Intended to provide for Its own on-grade parking on the site wlfFiout the use of a reciprocal parking agreement with any neighboring property owners • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The surrounding properties are completely developed There are no known cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to any of the surrounding developments See Item #9 above for a description of the neighboring The surrounding properties are a mixture of one and two story developments with parapet Imes similar to that proposed for the Church Complex The surrounding properties are a mixture a flat and pitched roofs, of varying styles, similar to that proposed for the Church Complex 14) Wtll [he proposed protect change the pattem, scale or character of the surrounding general area o/the profect~ The proposed Church Compies will not change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the protect 15) Ind~ca[e the type of short-term and long-tens noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods ofsoundproofmg are proposed Both short-term and long-term noise generated by the protect well be extermely limited as no Industrial uses are proposed and most acitivities will occur Indoors Most Church activities well occur off-peak hours from the surrounding properties as most Church functions occur on the weekend or in the evening While the need for'soundproofing' is not anticipated, the complex surrounds a central courtyard so that the sound from any outdoor functions well be naturally buffered by the walls of the buildings themselves '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees A single, lone mature olwe tree sits midway along the south property Ilne This tree is Intended to be protected during construction and relocated to the central drop-off circle In the middle of the site. EnvironmantallnioForm doc Page 4 of 11 n ~ ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM 17) Indreate any bodres of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into whrch the site drams There are no man-made or natural bodres of .rater Into whrch the site drains other than the exlsting city storm dram system In the streets surroundlng the property 18) Indicate expected amount o/ water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanf~cation, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gaUday) Peak use (gaUDay) b CommercraUlnd (gaUday/ac) 1.500 00 Peak use (gaUmrn/ac) 3.000 00 19) Indreate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer Il septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests 1/discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clan/icat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal(gaUday) 6 CommercraUlndustnal (gaUday/ac) 1.000 00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units Detached (md~cate range of parcel saes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze Attached (mdica[e whether units are rental or for sale units) 21) Anticipated range of sate pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ ~) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type EnvironmanlallnfoForm tloc Page 5 of 11 /~ Gj ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM . 23) Indicate anGapated household s¢e 6y unit type EnvvonmentallnfoForm doc Page 6 of 11 ~ 5~ Created on 5/2212002 4 09 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or mshtuhonal uses Religious services, worship, offices, family center, youth center, adult education, cafeteria, gymnasium, church-related small retail 28) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type Commercial Sanctuary 68,200 sf Chapel 6,360 sf Office 20,180 sf Cafeteria 10,730 sf Book Store 2,700 sf Retail 3,630 sf Storage 10,000 sf . Total 121,800 sf Instttuttonal Children's Church 28,090 sf Youth Center 32,290 sf Adult Education 19,580 sf Total 79,960 sf Grand total area 201,760 sf 27) Indicate hours of operation 7 AM to 11 PM Monday through Sunday 28) Number of employees Total 70 Maximum Shift fih Time of Maximum Shift fits EnwronmentallntoFonn doc Page 7 of 11 /„ / _ O Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM 29) Provide breakdown of anhapatedlclassl/ications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indlcat~on of the rate of here /or each classlficahon (attach add~honal sheet If necessary) Job classifications will Include clerical, administrative, accounting, counseling, and Instructional staff Salaries will range from true volunteers to those earning as much as $80 000 per year 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the Cfty 40 '31) For commeraal and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Alr Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) nun EnvironmentallnfoForm doc Page 8 of 11 ~ / ., I Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine then ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ecty If so, please md~cate their response Yes CVW D Issued a W III Serve letter Copy attached 33) In [he known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples of hazardous and/or towc materials include, but are not I~mited [o PCB's, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, ails, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known No 34) Wdl the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above I/yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method o/ disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and crorrect tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I further understand [hat additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date iz. 6 . 04 Signature Tdle• pROJEGT Md~14&>°iK - t411-C /4!'LNIT{rGTs , EnwronmentallnfoFortn doc Page 9 of 11 ~ / _ ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM • ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day ApUCondo 400 gal/day CommerciaUlndustrial General and Regional Commerclal 3,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commerclal 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2,500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3,000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2 0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gaVday ApUCondos 200 gaVday Com mercia UI n d ustria I General Commercial 2,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1,500 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3,000 gal/day/ac Source Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 EnwronmentallnfoFonn doc Page 70 of 11 f • / _~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM • ATTACHMENT B Contact the school dlstrlct for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Llne Road, Sulte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Sulte 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etlwanda 5959 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 EnwronmentallnfoFortn doc Page 11 of 11 ~ / _! ~ Created on 5/22/2002 4 09 PM PHOTOStOOKING ONTO ~-IE SITE _ ~'~ ~~ ' %~ 'd d ~ d ' I 1 ~~~W~.' ~' WRNS:...- ~ ~-PHOTO #4 ~''"" ...,~._.m. "PHOTO #3 PHOTO #2 ~~~~ t PHOTO #1 ~ ~T~ ?......y'yy * v 4'i1~. vnt a L +ly ~ A. .v PHOTO #2 ~ ~ ~ ;, ~ " ., : ~ ~ ~ ~ ..: t~r r'"p1~"x~ -. w- '; -.~' "' -~ ~ ~ ' ~ F ~ ~~ n ": v `~i'C ' C ~ ~ ~ , y~ rr =r k_ ~ , yt ,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ t x+ is C i ~'` ~r._ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ N 42u:v:v ~~ ~.. F'~ 1~r~' ~ ~'~~j ~Y i ~ _ ~ ~ i ` :~~ ~ ~ " ~ " : ~~ ~ " .~ " ~~~ ~~{/~~}r 'h ~~ vt`a V a+. a~ Y «'br y ~`. ~y+. p . ~{,.. ~ <'~.p i ~~~tj 't ~ ~ .t lv+. ~f~~' . ~J~4 " ~~] .1 . 3 l ~ r~ : ~ ~ ~_. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t . i ,{_ in_A!..+ i . / PHOTO #3 PHOTO #4 ~ ~~ PHOTOStOOKING ONTO ~-IE SITE PHOTO #7 _,,PHOTO #& .~. L.... G~ .1 .. LT. ~.~ -- ---~ ~"' ^ PHOTO #5 _.W._... f ' ,~ 3~ ~ ' ~'w ~~ .~ _. __ i- -~~s= _..~._._,. .. PHOTO #5 PHOTO #6 ~ /P /HOTO #8 ~~~ • PHOTOS~OOKING FROM ~E SITE f PHOTO #4 r ` HOTO #3 ~~~~.._ r. xr ^~ .-= PHOTO#2 ~,.^[ 1- ~' , PHOTO #1 ',~` ~:n. ',, -- -_ - - - PHOTO #1 PHOTO #3 PHOTO #2 / -PnHOTO #4 ~WI PHOTOS COOKING FROM'~1E SITE i PHOTO #§/~ ` ~; j PHOTO #6 ~ °~. _... PHOTO #7 ` _ ,~'- PHOTO #8 ~: ~~; ,e ;` i V.. ~ ,~,«, t ~rsvr r z _` PHOTO #5 k at PHOTO #7 PHOTO #6 r __.. P~OTO #8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II • BACKGROUND 1. Project File Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01244 2. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2004-01072 3. Description of Protect: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH - A request to develop a new 200,000 square foot worship center including offices, meeting rooms, classrooms, and retail shops on 33.50 acres in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue - APN 0208-354-Ot and 04 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address. WLC Architects Inc 10470 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park, Subarea 7 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The surrounding properties are all developed with 1-and 2-story office and industrial bwldings and a private hospital to the Werth 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval Is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o-Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G Rev 10/26/04 -I Initial Study for Abundant Living Family Church City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (X) Aesthetics (X) Agricultural Resources (X) Air Quality (X) Biological Resources (X) Cultural Resources (X) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (X) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources ()Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation (x) Transportationlfraffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (X) I find that although the proposed project could environment, there will not be a significant effect in project have been made by, or agreed to, by the NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 1 ' Prepared By Reviewed By have a significant effect on the this case because revisions m the prolect proponent A MITIGATED Date ~ 2 t7$~ Date ~ ~ 0~ LJ • Rev 10/26/04 G ~ h Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Then Signifiwnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potaneally Significant With MiagaLOn Than $pnificant No I act Inco ratetl I act I aM EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas O O U (~) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (~) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) The vacant site has a scenic vista of the mountains to the north, except where obstructed by a 3-story hospital to the north The protect design concentrates buildings to the interior of this large, 33 5-acre site so that views from public streets are maintained The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue, and is characterized by office and industrial development to the west and south, with a private hospital to the north The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and parking lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant C~ Rev 10/26/04 ~~i Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Sgrnlcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenaally Sigmhcant Wnh M,oganon Than Significant No 1 act Inm retell I att I att 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, because of their location or nature, could result in conversicn of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The vacant site is designated as Prime Farmlands, however, is not designated as Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue The property is surrounded by office and industrial development, with a private hospital the north There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) This rough-graded site is located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue and is surrounded by office and industrial development, with a private hospital the north There are small remnant vineyards in the surrounding area within a 1/2 mile radius Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY. Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the O O O (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation Rev 10/26/04 ~~a u • Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Lass man Signilicant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources pp g, Fmentially Significant wpm Mnigaaon Than Signdsam No 1 act Inco ratetl I act 1 as c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of O O O (/) any criteria pollutant for which the prolect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide mcrease in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the prolect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. The construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. Rev 10/26/04 x'13 Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Lass man Significant Less Issues and Su ortn Information Sources pp g Potannauy Spndicant wnn Miagavon rnan Srgnilrant No I act Inco retetl I act I act 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material In accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water l]uallty Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~q emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,q emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PMtq would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect Rev. 10/26/04 • Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less man Sipnifcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Futenea~~y Sipmpcent w~tn Mi4pahon man ~9n~ficent No ~ act Inro tatl ~ tt ~ act basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in sigmficant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commeraal facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left Idling for prolonged periods (i.e., In excess of 10 minutes). 11) All Industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. • 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the atywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6, continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmficant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care factlities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located adtacent to a private hospital to the north The mitigation measures described under b) above will Rev 10/26/04 1~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less rnan S~pmficaM Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g FatanaallY Sipmfitant wan MNpaaon rnen 9pnificant No I act Into rated I an I n reduce impacts to mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtecteonable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (~) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and W eldlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (~) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (~) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (~) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plats Comments: a) The protect site is a vacant island located in an area fully developed with office an industrial uses, and a hospital The site has been designated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as designated Delhi Sands Flower loving-fly habitat A report was prepared (LSA Associates March 7, 2005) The report concluded that, "areas which have been commercially developed, and permanently altered by human activities are not considered as potentially suitable or recoverable according the Recovery Plan " The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments as well as annual decking for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect sate is within the area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development well not adversely affect rare or • • Rev 10/26/04 ~ ~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less roan $ipnil¢anf Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ovenl,ally S nd¢em ~n Mni Dori pTnan Si mLCam No I act Into retatl I act 1 att endangered species of plants or animals because the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts There are no blue-line streams or ephemeral streams through property or on any surrounding property c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The surrounding area is developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There is one heritage Olive tree on the protect site, which the applicant intends to relocate on-site or replace in-kind, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance 1) The existing Oak heritage tree shall be relocated on site or replaced in kind If the tree fails to survive the relocation, a mature replacement (64-inch or 70-inch box size) shall be provided f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O U (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native • Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented `~ Rev 10/26/04 G ` Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Lass Than Si9nificent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potanueily 9gnifitent wan Mmpatlon man Significant No I eq Into rated I act I act 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or slgnificant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and eliminate adverse project effects prehistoric resources, following Quality Act (CEDA) guidelines. recommend conditions of approval to on slgnificant, Important, and unique appropriate California Environmental • • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the Inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original Illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Pian Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstructlon field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (I.e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must Include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the Interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert . earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading Rev 10/26/04 Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Tian Sigmhcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Po,anaally s~on,ucam wnn ~a~aa~n man slyniacan, No I acY Ir,co rated I act I contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments as well as annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction rv) Landshdes~ O O O (`~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil tfiat is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have sods incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Rev 10/26/04 ! I Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Then 5~9n'1¢ent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Petene>vlY Sipnifcant wpm MWpason roan Significant No I act I,xro retetl I act I Comments. a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes within 5 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„.7 5 earthquakes, is 9 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas fault, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 12 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) dally to reduce Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, In accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Loamy Sand association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matoriry of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soli deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Loamy Sod association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils typically have light erosion, and runoff is slow No adverse impacts are anticipated Rev 10/26/04 -( ~~ • Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Lass Than Sprvficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenbalry SiBmficant wnn Miapanon man SipnA¢ent No I ect Into retea I ad I act e) The protect well connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the protect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the O O O (~) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a hst of O O O (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (~) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division which is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a counntywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Rev 10/26/04 n $ I Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less men Sgn,hcant Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g PotenLally Sigrvficant wnn MNgaaon men Signficant No 1 cl Inco retaE I ett I ett Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site The recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 3 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limas No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies . and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and Is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wend-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fue District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements~ () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intertere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site Rev 10/26/04 ~, $a • Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Sgnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potenaally sign,ficam Wnh Miaganon Than Sign,fi<ant No I a<t Inco tetl I ad I an d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (~) site or area, Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (~) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quallty~ () () () ('~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (~) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, Intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the (allure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (~) Comments• a) Water and sewer service Is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Protect Is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an Industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction PermR Include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, Including site clearance and grading Develop and Implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site Into receiving waters C~ Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertorm inspections of all BMPs Rev 10/26/04 ~'83 Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Then Siprvhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potanuelly $ipruhtent wpm Mtlipefion roan Slpnifitare No I ct Inco ratetl I atl I act Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the protects construction contractor will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a WQMP for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Civiltec Engineering, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activdies 1) Prior to Issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, Included in grading plan, and Implemented for the proposed project that Identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are Initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall Include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be Included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediatian or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) All drainage shall be diverted away from the trash enclosure area. Post- Cons truction Operational 6) The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality ed by CIVILTEC Engineering/February 2005, to r pa Management Plan (WQMP) pre ~I Q y Rev 10/26/04 ~ v ` Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Tian Sprvficanl less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g '°'°"taOY Sipmficant wpm Mmpamn Than Sipruficant No I ecf Inco rateE I etl I an reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herblcides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the Issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intertere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase the water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm Rev 10/26/04 ~85 Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Lass men Sipnifcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fotanaally sipmucant wan Mmpaaon man SipniLCant No I C Inco retetl I acl I n event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to Issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this prolect No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City Rev 10/26/04 u Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Tfian Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pmanaally Sipntl¢am wan Mmgauon man SiBmficant No I act Inw retetl I ecl 1 act 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the protect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (~) or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located on the north of Civic Center Drive, b8tween Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue and is surrounded by office and industrial development and a private hospital the north The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated • b) The protect site land use designation is Industrial Park The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural Community Plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, the development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments. a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact Rev 10/26/04 Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less man Signlfiwm Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Fria""a"Y Sipni6cant wpm Mdigeuon man Sipmhcant No I act Inco rated I an I an 11. NOISE. Would the prolect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in O O O (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise O O U (/) levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The prolect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact expected b) The uses associated with this type of prolect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the prolect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, Including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to th/e~Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise Rev , 0/26/04 l 9 ~ g Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Sgndmant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g rmannany Sipnl¢am wan Mnlpation Tnan SlpmM1Cant No I an Inco orated I ect I ect levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measure shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, .or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, If heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. • e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 3 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The protect is located in a developed area and will not induce population growth The protect developer, Abundant Living Family Church, is already located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 1 mile the south of the subtect property Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated • b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No immpacts are anticipated Rev 10/26/04 ~ 0~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Then Sipnipcent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g ame"eelly slpnlucant with MNpeson The" Sipnifcent Np 1 aM Inco orated I ect I ect 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protectwn~ O O O (~) b) Police protections O O O (~) c) Schools O O O (~) d) Parks () () () (~) e) Other public facdiUes~ O O U (~) Comments: a) The site is located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue, would be served by a fire station located approximately 5 miles south from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Budding and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled, as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The protect will be regwred to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of Building Permits No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 2 miles from the protect site The protect design includes construction of indoor space that can be used for sports activities and a baseball field The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately u • Rev 10/26/04 /l n o Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Sipmi¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Poptent,ally S, niLCant ~h Ma oon B hen Si nificant No I act Inco roteE I ect I act adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is In excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 2 miles from the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase In the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) The protect design includes construction of indoor space that can be used for sports activities and a baseball field See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the protect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () (/) ( ) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (/1 Rev 10/26/04 ~~~ Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Sipmhcanf Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources I otenaally Sipndicam wnn Mltlgafion Tnan Sigmhcanf No 1 act Inco orated I aM I act g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 7 7 average daily trips by vehicles The proposed protect includes the development of a 3,100 seat sanctuary As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicte trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Bwlding Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate 128 two-way peak p m hour trips, and two-way peak 22 a m hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for regwring a traffic impact analysis The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials. The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does include specific line of site issues at the protect driveways The applicant will be regwred to provide the minimum clear line-of-sight at all protect driveways and maintain the minimum landscape requirements per City's Development Code The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature The protect will have aless-than-significant impact is anticipated e) The protect wail be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and wit, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle tnp reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) Rev 10/26/04 ~qa • s Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Sipmimant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ao+enoally SgnA¢am with Mnipaaon man Sipnifcant No I act Inco rates I act I atl 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protest's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (~) capacity to accommodate the protest's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana RWCB regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated • b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered signficant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system Currently, there is a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency/'at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Rev 10/26/04 l~ q Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 less Than Sipnditant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pptennally Significant With MiLpafion Than Significant Nc I act Into rated 1 act I C Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the prolect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the prolect have impacts that are individually () () () (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a prolect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the prolect have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed prolect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavcidable adverse Rev 10/26/04 ~ -t Initial Study for DRC2004-01244 ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Lass Than Sipmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenuelly Sipmficant With M,fipaaon Then S,pnificant No I act Into aced I acl I ect Impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that well be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space Wlth these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative Impacts Is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant Impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, Impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant Impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained In this Initial Study well ensure Impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects Identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department office, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (x) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (x) Master Environmental Assessment far the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (x) Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 15, 1994) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no sigmflcant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature ~ Date 6 ~ 22 ' OS Print Name and Title `5 ~ ~US~'f~~ ~ 'PRoJ- n-1A.NA6f~t2 Rev 10/26/04 ~ ~ 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01244 Public Review Period Closes• July 27, 2005 Project Name• Project Applicant: W LC Architects Project Location (also see attached map)• Located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Street and White Oak Avenue - APN 0208-354-01 and 04 Protect Description A request to develop a new 200,000 square foot worship center including offices, meeting rooms, classrooms, and retail shops on 33 50 acres in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report wdl not be regwred Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Cwic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Julv 27. 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By • ~_I~f' City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the pro)ect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forrn After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form Unantiapated arcumstances may arse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel i..J The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time In those instances requinng long-term project momtonng, the applicant shall provde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activties at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an indiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits "I U • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2004-01244 Applicant: Abundant Living Church Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Cameron Date: June 21.2005 .. .. - Av Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for City venficatwn Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CP/BO C Review of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected gwpment use The construction contractors shall rovide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was nvestigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff ` All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shalt be applied either by hand or high-volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site g0 C Review of Plans AIC 2/4 throw h seedin and waterin ..~ 1 of 8 • .. ... -. -. .. - Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads B0 C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large B0 C Review of Plans A/C Z4 areas to erosion over extended eriods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of B0 C Review of Plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work eriods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound en ineerin ractices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , B0 C Durng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 re wrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils B0 C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil BO C During A/C 4 tabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) datly to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not ~n use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C During A p/3 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged Construction periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 1 2~ . • ~J . .. ~. All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP D Durng A 3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Construction Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP D During A 3 more employees shall be regwred to configure their Construction operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/3 regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/3 requved to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biologicat'Resources ' ~ ~° _* ~~ ~ ~ "+ ,..,. ; ~ x The existing Oak heritage tree shall be relocated on site CP C Review of Plans A/C 2 or replaced in kind If the tree fails to survroe the relocation, a mature replacement (64-inch or 70-inch box size) shall be provided t~ ~ Cultural Resources ~k,s~ ~;~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~:~~ ~ ~~ >__ , , ~.sw ~ > r If any prehistoric and archeological resources are CPBO C RewewUf A/D 3/4 encountered before or during grading, the developer will Report retain a qualified archeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Rewew of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeolo ical value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/B0 C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using then special qualities as a theme or focal oint 3 of 8 -. .. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage Report • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) wdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archivin A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruct~on CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mingahon mondonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the followin measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and Cp g Review of A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time Burin the interval of earth-disturbm activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared B0 e/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notif the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum 4~8 O .. ~. .. . . Geology and Soils' ~,` "~<-~ ;~ ~ ;;;' ,~~~ n~, . The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RWOCB) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 with - drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology andWatey,Qu`blfry ~ .. ~ ~~~~ "``' "~~-~`~' ~'- - °~ ~ ' Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Polution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speatically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on site to reduce pollutants during construction actiwties entering the storm drain system to the mximum extent practical 5 of 8 _.G~ O .. - An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Grading Plan and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-sde and off-site erosion from the time of ground distribution actroities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specifythe timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site All drainage shall be diverted away from the trash CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 enclosure area The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water duality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by CIVILTEC Engineenng/February 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical ~8 Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticidesmerbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permds .. CE B/C/D Review of Plans .. . A/C .. - 2/4 Prior to issuance of Bwlding Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ytda" f N'2 .*'' C Noise~€~`~~M>:rc~". ,~,.'~,~' tMi T ~f ~ ~R ~E tP '~, 21+ p .nrS. ~ ~:f 4* `;rE~- ' ~~ * "-r -;~ ~ ~ ~ Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO B Review of Plans C 2 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday O 7 of 8 ..G: 6~ .. ~ -. . .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO B Review of Plans C 2 standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notrfy the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP B Review of Plans C 2 as possible in first phase Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO B Review of Plans C 2 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee 8 - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation • ~8 • RESOLUTION NO 05-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE BETWEEN RED OAK AVENUE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-354-01 AND 04 A Recitals 1 WLC Architects filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01244, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on July 27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, with a street frontage of approximately 5,000 feet and lot depth of approximately 2,100 feet, and is presently vacant, improved with curb and gutter only, and b The property to the north of the subject site is a pnvate hospital, the propertyto the south consists of the Rancho Cucamonga Post Office, the property to the east is Industnal Park, and the property to the west is Industrial Park, and c The protect includes office buildings, worship budding, children's educational budding, adult education building, dining hall, book store, storage, retail, sanctuary budding, youth worship building, and d The protect will allow for parking of church transportation vehicles, currently including one large tram, three trolleys, one bus, six vans and a total of 1,141 parking spaces, and e The protect includes one sports field on the northeast comer of W hate Oak Avenue and Civic Center Drive ~ ld~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vianity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent cudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed protect, no significant adverse environmental effects wdl occur 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subcect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) The applicant shall submit for a modification of Conditional Use Permit DRC2004-01244 if Abundant Living Family Church expands to include a pnvate school or day care facility 2) The applicant shall submit a Uniform Sign Program, including on-site directional signs, for approval prior to approval of a construction plan 3) Shade trees in the following areas at a rate of one tree per every 3 parking stalls are regwred a) along the south edge of the north parking lot (if the parking lot is not re-oriented) to continue the tree pattern within the parking fields, and b) along the east edge of the southeast parking lot to continue the tree pattern within the parking fields C i as PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244-ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 3 4) Provide Honey Locust trees along the west side of the north entrance drive to match all other entry drives 5) Provide an on-site directional sign program throughout the site to lead parishioners and visitors to the various mirnstry areas These signs should be architecturally compatible 6) Provide decorative pavement treatment at all entrance driveways, behind the right-of-way line to a minimum of 40 feet 7) If pedestrian access to the church impedes traffic on Red Oak Avenue, the church shall be regwred to install a wrought iron fence 8) Providing an illustrative elevation with landscape detail of the ivy vines on the bwldmgs at the time of plan check 9) All drive entries and interior pedestrian walkways~shali be constructed with colored, stamped concrete consistent with the approved drawings 10) If phasing of the protect is to occur, the rough graded pads for additional bwldmgs shall be appropriately hydroseeded, irrigated, and maintained until said construction occurs 11) All trash enclosures shall be constructed to City Standards to match the bwlding and include an overhead trellis to match the building design 12) Tree planting at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bwlding shall be provided on all bwldmgs 13) All lighting, benches, trash receptacles etc shall be consistentwith the overall design of the protect All details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner 14) A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc , shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of bwldmg permits 15) Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City Planner a) Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) b) Separate pedestrian access that does not regwre the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors c) Roll-up doors G lO°l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 4 d) Trash bins with counter-weighted lids e) Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis 16) Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 17) The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area light fixtures, budding light fixtures (exterior), and parking lot light fixtures Enaineenna Department 1) Red Oak Avenue, White Oak Avenue, and Civic Center Drive frontage improvements shall be in accordance to City "Secondary Street" standards, as regwred a) Provide sidewalk, street trees, and 9500 Lumens HPSV streetlights b) Provide drive approaches in accordance with the City Driveway Policy, a minimum distance of 300 feet separation c) Provide traffic signing and striping, as regwred d) Provide horizontal and vertical line-of-sight drawings for all driveways e) Protect existing curbs and gutters or repair, as regwred ~ Protect existing R26 "No Stopping" signs 2) Drive approaches shall be in accordance with City Standard Drawing No 101 Type C, a minimum of 35 feet wide and a maximum of 50 feet wide, and shall intersect streets at right angles Driveways with median shall have two 20-foot wide drive aisles separated by a 10-foot wide median The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way Revise plans accordingly a) The proposed width of the approach (25 feet) aligned with Spruce Avenue is acceptable 3) The separate parcels contained within the protect boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits Process either a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Merger or a Parcel Map GII~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 • Page 5 4) A contribution in-lieu of construction for the Foothill Boulevard median island shall be paid to the City as indicated below The amount of the contribution shall be prorated on a per acre basis from the total contribution attributable to Parcel Map 6725 The calculated amount or said contribution is $753 56 per acre 5) Prior to grading permit issuance, Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be shown on the Grading Plan The WQMP dated February 5, 2005, has been reviewed and the following items need to be completed a) Protect Site Information -Provide SIC Code b) Protect Site Information -Respond to question "Erosive Site Conddions~" c) Protect Categories -Additional Category (#8 Parking lots of 5,000 square feet) d) Section 1 1 -Provide contact name or position e) Section 1 2 -Provide grading permit number when issued and WDID# f) Section 1 3 -Provide Location Map and Site Plan identifying storm drain facilities and structures, structural Best Management Practices (BMPs), storrnwaterflow (drainage), and the receiving water g) Section 1 4 -Complete this section h) Section 2 1 -Complete questions #1-4 i) Section 2 1 -Complete Pollutant of Concern Summary Table from Table 2-1 in the Guidance section of the WQMP (The expected and potential pollutants from the additional Category should be included also ) ~) Section 2 2-Section 2 2 2 and 2 2 3 do not need responses because of response given m 2 2 1 k) Section 2 3 -Complete this section Il Section 311 - Provide description of actions taken or tustification/alternative for ail responses . m) Section 312 - Provide description of actions taken or tustification/alternative for all responses n) Section 3 2 -Additional Protect Category should be marked ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 6 o) Section 3 2 -Prowde justification/alternative or implementation description for each BMP p) Section 3 3 -Complete Treatment Control BMP Selection Matrix by referring to the Pollutant Control Table 2-1 filled out previously Incorporate changes effected by additional category q) Section 3 3 -Provide Speafications for Filtration Treatment Control BMP referenced r) Section 3 4 - Prowde Speafications for Manufactured/Proprietary, and Media Filter BMPs referenced s) Section 3 4 -Locate vegetated buffer strips and vegetated swales on Grading Plan t) Section 3 4 1 -Complete this section u) Section 3 4 2 -Complete this section v) Section 4 -Complete this section w) Section 5 -Complete this section x) Section 6 -Complete City's Certification form for compliance with this section y) Plan Check -Locate proposed BMPs on Grading Plan 6) The applicant shall provide illustrations at the time of plan check which shows that the project can achieve the minimum clear line-of-sight regwred for safety at all project driveways 7) Prowde the on-site design of the existing shared use driveway with the medical office at their northerly project entrance The applicant shall contact the owners of the medical offices and design a drive aisle that is mutually agreeable to both properly owners and the City Planner Alternatively, they may decide to close this driveway and construct separate driveways at a minimum of 150 feet apart Environmental Mitigation Air Quabty 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and • maintained as per manufacturers'speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification ~~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 7 2) Pnor to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equpment use The construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work perods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engmeenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public thoroughfares oroccurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ~j~(3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244-ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 8 7) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equpment when not in use 10) All mdustnal and commercal facilities shall post signs regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolmk schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All mdustnal and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees . shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolmk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping Brologrcal 1) The existing Oak hentage tree shall be relocated on site or replaced m kmd If the tree fails to survive the relocation, a mature replacement (64-inch or 70-inch box size) shall be provided Cultural 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated sites from • demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value l I'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 9 Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropnate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) gwdelines Prepare a techrncal resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation monitoring is appropnate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 10 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactroe construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Offiaal for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actiwties entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actiwties are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) All drainage shall be diverted away from the trash enclosure area 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by CIVILTEC Engineering/February 2005 to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits n I I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 • Page 11 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 9) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwldmg Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Nose 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m or, weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bwldmg Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwldmg Offical within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwiding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at anytime on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive . land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution I l? PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-66 DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH July 27, 2004 Page 12 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~ I Ig COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-01244 SUBJECT: ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH APPLICANT: WLC ARCHITECTS LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, BETWEEN RED OAKAND WHITE OAK AVENUES ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: omole6on Date ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No OS-66, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _I_/_ bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development . Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity bung commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ y Planner t of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Ci [ ~ 1 G ~~-1 Protect No DRC2004-01244 Comolehon Date D. E. 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The b~iildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _I_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_I_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bulding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public wew and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 Ali building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of budding permits Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/ /_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bulding plans 2 For commercial and industnal protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ budding colors Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a bulding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/ /~ contain a 12-inch walk adtacent tc the parking stall (including curb) 2 G iao Project No DRC2004-01244 Comolehon Date 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across arculation aisles shall be provided _I_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exjts shall be striped per City standards 5 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commeraal and office faalities with 25 or more _I_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commeraal, office, jndustrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, addjtional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where thjs results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval jn the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier jn _/_/_ accordance with the Muniapal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved m place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted wjthin rndustnal protects, and a minimum of 30% withrn _I_/_ commeraal and office protects, shall be speamen size trees - 24-jnch box or larger 4 Wjthin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/ /_ stalls 5 Trees shall be planted jn areas of public wew ad/scent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _!_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shalt include a permanent irrigation system to be rnstalled by the developer pnor to occupancy 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks m excess of 6 feet jn vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted jn staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 3~'lal Prgect No DRC2004-01244 Completion Date 8 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving conddion and shall receive regular pruning, fertdizrng, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the requred landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 10 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along White Oak and Red Oak Avenues 11 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/ /_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 12 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 13 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code H. Sig ns 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall complywith the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted far City Planner review and _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits I. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $474 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ /_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permds 4Gia~ Protect No DRC2004-01244 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, ~OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-01244) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal . 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2004-01244) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday • through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays / / / / / ! / / I / / / / / / / / / 5 ~ la3 Pro)ect No DRC2004-01244 Completion Date Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califoma Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 4 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards P. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements regwred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one budding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall mare than 95 percent of the bwldings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development / / / / / / / / / I / / / I -r-f~ • s ~ I a `~' Protect No DRC2004-01244 Comoletion Date Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Red Oak Avenue X X X X White Oak Avenue X X X X Clvlc Center Drive X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic slgnal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Englneer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Englneer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer . d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along motor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the CIty Englneer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing CIry roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure penults are required Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / G ~ a5 Protect No DRC2004-01244 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Platnaus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal P A less than 8 ft Pyrus celleryana "Aristocrat" NCN 3 ft 20 ft o c 15-gal RED OAK AVENUE Platanus acenfolia London Plane Tree 8 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal WHITE OAK AVENUE B2chychdon populneus Bottle Tree 5 ft 25 ft o c 15ya1 STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE FOR ON-SITE PLAN REFERENCE ONLY- NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS WHITE OAK AVENUE Adtacent to budding m Lagerstcemia mdica Crape Myrtle 3 tt 20 ft o c 24" box tree wells "Natchez" Hybrid -White Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill salt amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shalt be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight platted as required Q. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer R. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protecticn District, and the / / / / / / / / / / _/-/ _/_/~ 8 C ~ac~ Prgect No DRC2004-01244 Comolehon Date Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 The separate parcels contained within the protect boundaries shall be legally combined into one _/_/_ parcel prior to issuance of bulding permits 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_!_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Budding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldmgs, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _~ ~ V. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors Ifwindows are within _/_/ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/ W. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility ' 9 ~ia~ Prgect No DRC2004-01244 Completion Date X. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and _/_/~ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and Itves 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/_/_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 10~I o~Q ~,,.a,~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ,, ~~ e - Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS June 2, 2005 Abundant Living Family Church NEC o/ Civic Center Drive and Red Oak Avenue DRC2004-01244 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety D~wsion to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided d Prowde one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 4000 • gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances ~Ia9 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed pro)ect may be used to provide the required fire flow subiect to Fire Distract review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are requred for alt protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 2 Commeraal or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 3 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Bwldings 4 "All structures that do not meet Fire Distract access regwrements (see Fire Access) When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure When buildings do not meet the regwrements of the 2001 California Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 7 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered 8 Class one standpipes will be regwred inside the Sanctuary budding FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code_ Pnor to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the budding or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire . Alarm Standard #10-6 2C~13~ 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is regwred to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions (See the approved access plans for exceptions on this project.) 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside tum radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside tum radws shall be 46-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In bwldmgs without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings 4 Access Walkways Handscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 3131 Commercial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in • accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before plaang the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c. Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex • If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 8 Roof Parapet: Access ladders are regwred in accordance to RCFPD Standards FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the pennit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property 4~I3a Battery Systems Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly Refrigeration Systems Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gas LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bemardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bulding 8 Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be requred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased orooertv which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of bwldings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards 5G~33 FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire t`~arshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard_Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in acwrdance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requvements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" 6G ~3~ PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a Incensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler momtonng system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment • is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraalhndustrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal • and industrial buildings The bwlding designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all buldings Please contact the fire inspector for a field meeting before posting the building designation 'C~'1~5 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the faality has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subtect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector C 8~I3~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17009 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request subdivide one common lot for residential condominium purposes on 1 OS acre of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route - APN:0207-262-02. Related Flle: Development Review DRC2003-01062. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01062 - . WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to develop 8 residential condominium units on 1 08 acre of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue - APN: 0207-262-02. Related Flle: SUBTT17009. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 8.08 units per acre B. Surroundmo Land Use and Zornna North - Single-Family Home; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Home; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Multi Family, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Multi Family; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The protect site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, approximately 350 feet south of Arrow Route. The site is a vacant parcel with a slope of approximately 2 percent. The parcel is bounded by asingle-family home to the north and south, apartments to the east, and condominiums to the west. Item H&J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17009 AND DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS . July 27, 2005 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General The proposed project includes 8 duplex condominwm units. The applicant is proposing one lot for condominium purposes, and the common areas will be maintained by a Homeowners Assoaation. The proposed square footage of the 3-bedroom condomirnums range from 1,176 square feet to 1,366 square feet. The two elevations proposed consist of a Craftsman style theme with rockwork and columns repeated at the main entry of each home and over the garage areas A consistent theme is repeated on all four elevations and includes buck detail and siding on all sides, craftsman style window detail, and porch lights. All driveways will incorporate decorative block in two designs. B. Desion Review Committee: The Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on May 3, 2005, and recommended that the protect be brought back with sigrnficant revisions, which included additional rockwork detail, movement in the front elevations, window and chimney detail, additional rafter details, and fishtail siding The revised project was brought back to the Committee on May 31, 2005, and was approved with conditions. C. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on August 17, 2004, at Agape Christian Fellowship. A total of 5 residents attended, and they were generally accepting of the layout and the architectural style of the homes. D Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II. Staff determined that the project could produce a significant but short-term adverse environmental impact in air quality during the site preparation/grading and because of equipment exhaust The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to aless-than-significant level. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract SUBTT17009, Development Review DRC2003-01062 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respect l sub ed Bd rail g City Planner BB:EC/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map/ Grading Plan Exhibit C - Landscape Plan Exhibit D - Elevations • Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Comments Dated May 3, 2005, and May 31, 2005 Exhibit F - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17009 Draft Resolution of Approval for Develo merit Review DRC2003-01062 ~(+s ~ . • . lf9~ 1 ! t '1 ~ s i 1 ~- 1 ~Y ,~j~" ~ / if t ti i i_t.! iE! 1111 c1c i~ 5t 14~~i ~1€ ~~: Oil q If ! 1 !~~• !i:l! ;!! i11f IE ~! ~ ~,~~~ ~ fiiif 13~~~~4i~~:iii; ie~i Cf~J _~ ~I~ ~--,i . n. >" . : ;et 1 ` ~ !~~ E i~ ` ~ii - : 4 !. : s-..{- ii .4 G 116f+ i~[ i~ 1 11 iCi ~ti ~l si 1li j ! iF 2~'i 14" 'l l~f ~ ~ 1 ~ i~iii~i~i~~i&E`'~~~i~'~s'~~iii, ' ~1172.~2i3>llaii~ Si(3 ilai!'i~if: G.....c:........, .:!:it2:2 -- , ~ i ~~ ~O i ~~~, ^ ! i, ~:l ~- ~ _ -- -- _ ..- ~ „ -3 }I ~_ J 11 ~ _ ,~ ---~.-:-= - - j ~~--- 4 _ L ~_ _ _/ ~~ ~clnibr~- A ..M'~..M~.TY ~~ i' E, ~! T ~~ ~~ ~! ~E ! $E S~ 1f O i I. a '~ ;~ ;~ ~- ~{,~ 13 WSIY6t (WO) •sJ JKFN[ 1100) AI resae .o eaBnaaa •aroa rauasan~ oon +am.D JNIA3AN(IS aNYI • JNI833NIJN8 71AIJ ``` '~r~II '~NI2333NI~1`i3 dH ~. +mw ow JIYIf •u D oem JbJW6 Jr wuD mrR mR wnm n wum l u w Iolwma ~m w.YO t-r In TM6 a JP dllYn WI® 3AV 310klQtlIFNOII~ lV'Jk!!.L n ~~~ ~ N j _~ l i +.av DMY-o auRYeOOw m~: an a.Ya.R - s .R.. tlm-o J9Mw VI - MI lrrne x~rvi- ..R lp Yl•1 ~ Y limOU ~ L YUFeaL OJ~3'I ?~ I ~~ ~~ 4 L I I d ~ dY11 A/,kA, ~ ~ __ i 1.KD Y]AV YaN .MN EW MS JOr J 1^NY -~rfr ~rrr , --- I JmYYJ ~ DM1R i '°° ? ~, ~rlf l ~ I / ~6 YY 0Yr MIIKOIIY LOrGTP' v D ,Y I 11 YN w p 914t :Ifl~ OY MY1 LYI TIP ?RID] ~ JYfU TI w m mw Tnr lraa tl1 >w w a m~na"mv'D a s e' u°~ rl uuo w m Pv w.m aw -Tnl a»i4°~46a. ~a aROC'.i YR n I RIB lDl1 m Jmr- lr D JwY JDmI w a wU Jmmll ,RUrJl Jn r a JzD KfY n JmRNI W lmee J.1011 br Ioln r a JM1Pl a JJYwJa RiVOe MI 110 iY/ !ri IOY Y419.0 94II01VIW 1Y MLIW FAM'!O 11 71 ~ I~ l1Y PM ZWE iOlr I YOtilaH~d1B JMDNmItl 1„r,. v ra Ilou av ~ v ~ v ° I YuY n . ~ )SMi ~M uaoRYlr mswvi KVIPr tl tlipl) a J9/610 OIDOW DY OI I a I~1 1B61RHQ9laWA) 10i II IM ~,{P/ IXI LA 1 I TVY W O MOIP [inY~O YNII 1M Y iNIP D lY L]lmV WI 1 xv 1eTer nmraa YiP Jar a J]}CTV vu l I / a-IX laW ~ w {~]EV Y I SOVJD 1p/ 011'Jp1) ImR J l ~ LT 6iLIT A r#x p)StKW T J/Oeq V.T S®1 A IlC ]~V LI i{Y Y pTY(py • ~ LM y YHYR ~'[1.O,V Y ( mmYY NuYRm AY iY9N T)r/I ' LI N YPEYJ w 1 YyY~~DR I J0 0n GEP2W T I ~} I -l Y ~~Y,~ L1P tl, . D.mgr FIW R.rr.W1. I lN]9YJ 1 I r ~0 OY-1 W/130g I JrWUy 1 Y-rar mm, %" r-ir• ~ •rr -- -~- '~ ~ I T :~'` p I ma"'u / 1M'JPIT3VU E1WSK3 I I - I..'. I I I ne~rrr 1 LiNI Ir[OJ 4 lIn MY4 Y , OS lO , l J .Y,~a --------------------- :ir ~~rr lrr rrb .rr. •-------- --Y i ~~ :. / n YINB0317YJ 30 31Y15 :UN/70~ ON/OBYNB3B NYS !0 SBBOJ3B •6 3.9Yd •Y NOOB dYri NI 030BOJ3B dYri Bad SY 'SONYI MJNOriYJ/p NI •L53M L 39NYB 'Nl/105 ! d/HSNMO! •6 NOLLJ35 'Bl 107 30 NOUBOd Y 30 NOLaOB/75 Y 9NI3B sasod~nd rvniNiwooNOO boy 600LL 'ON db'W lOt/!~l ~Al1d1N~1 3/,ki7 OOON+~~ 4 ~• gA~_~ R~ 3n~Ja ~ I~ ~~ «~ J ~,cln~bi+ G ~~~s i pe~~~~~,~; ~ I ~ e ~ ~ S~g,=3~~~ ~9a ~~ ~eQ I~j ~~a ~ ~~~It~~ll i 1 1® i F ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! ' ~ ~ ~ ~- F ~!! ~e~~ a x~~ ~ t C L3Y71 .F4'a, ; . BLDG. III SZET^ PROPERTIES- 8565 MEDRONE AV E- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA R~,EL`EVAT'IONS- COLOR SCHEME A FOR BLDG.= &3IL Williams Architects, Inc 05/14105 : , DRC# 2003-01082 Tracidt SU8TT17009 s s s EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION L SZETD PROPERTIES- 8565 MEDRONE AV E- RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CA Wdllams Architects, Inc O,R3yELEyATION5- COLOR,SCHEME B FOR BLDG.ZL&~"~" ,- ~ ~ - t'• OB-14-05~' DRC82003-01002TrecidlSU6TT17009 EA5T ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATI^N NORTH ELEVATION DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.20 p.m. Emily Cameron May 3, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT17009 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide one common lot for residential condominium purposes on 1 08 acres of land in the Medum Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue -APN. 0207-262-02. Related File. Development Review DRC2003-01062. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01062 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to develop 8 residential condominium units on 1.08 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue -APN: 0207-262-02 Related Fde. Tentative Tract SUBTT17009 Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to construct eight duplex condominiums approximately 600 feet south of Arrow Route, on the east side of Madrone Avenue. The site is currently vacant and is relatively flat The project is bordered to the north and south bysingle-family residential homes. The homes to the south have fieldstone detail on low walls facing Madrone Avenue. The protect is bordered to the east by apartments, and to the west by townhomes The protect wdl consist of two floor plans and two elevations, ranging in square footage from 1,549 for Plan A and 1,587 for Plan B The units wdl resemble four duplexes attached at the intenor walls Both plans provide atwo-car garage, and incorporate split faced block, siding, and stucco as main matenals of the units The applicant has incorporated shutters, window surrounds, and potshelves to the design All plans have a split face block base with craftsman style windows and siding as a secondary element on all four sides of the units The proposed walls consist of split face block on the intenor, stucco walls with split-faced pilasters along the entry and faang Madrone Avenue Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues wdl be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. The Development Code regwres 360-degree architectural treatment to all elevations with a speafic architectural style Although the proposed architectural styles are not completely out of style to the surrounding area, the elevations could be enhanced with a strong Craftsman bungalow style, including additional materials and architectural features. See attached examples for architectural details that would be consistent with the adjacent properties. Staff suggests that the following enhancements be made to be consistent with the surrounding homes• Extend the siding on the north and south elevations across the second story where the windows are placed Omit split-faced block on all entnes and replace with native nver rock on columns and wrapped around front entry. Replace stucco columns with wood beams. Repeat field stone detail on all chimneys. Omit the decorative bands across the chimney chi b~~ ~ H ~1 g DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS May 3, 2005 Page 2 Because split-face block does not fit the character of the residential area, replace split- face walls with nver rock and plasters to include a decorative tnm cap Continue siding on all chimneys and delete honzontal tnm across the chimney. Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wll discuss the following secondary design issues: Repeat mullion style windows on all sides including the rear elevations. 2. Add exposed rafter tats below the roof to create a craftsman style roofline. Introduce planter boxes with a useable ledge, a minimum of 12 inches Provide additional corbels below the windows at a larger scale. Provide the following landscape requirements per the Development Code. 45 trees per gross acre, 10 percent 36-inch box, 10 percent 24-inch box, and SO percent 15-gallon sized trees Also provide additional trees in the recreation area 5 Revise the Landscape Plan to include the trees shown on the elevation A small accent tree shall be provided on the front elevation between each garage as shown on the elevation Policv Issues• The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion No wood fencing is allowed With the type of siding proposed, two-toned PVC style fencing rs recommended. Where fieldstone is used, it shall be real and from a local source River rock veneers are not permitted Where a double wall condition exists, the developer is required to work with the adtoimng property owners to create a single wall. 4. Vary the window design of the garage doors to incorporate an architectural style which compliments the proposed homes. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the protect be revised and return to the Design Review Committee pnor to being scheduled for Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Emly Cameron The Design Review Committee discussed the Mator and Secondary issues and determined that the applicant wll need to return for further review to address all issues. The following comments must be addressed prior to scheduling the protect for further rewew• ~~~ DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS May 3, 2005 Page 3 Because of the prominent placement of the garages, a trellis feature or simdarfeature shall be incorporated to soften the front elevation 2. Provide stonework all the way around the chimneys The applicant may use the veneer bnck presented at the meeting, as conceptually approved 3. Provide additional detail on the sliding glass doors to include mullions or a similar upgrade to the rear (north) elevation. 4 Revise elevations to incorporate additional color palettes forthe bnck veneer Additionally, the Committee would like further contrast m the overall color palette for the homes 5 Provide additional rafter tails to all four sides of the homes The roof eaves shall incorporate large beams at the end of the roofline. 6. Revise the window above the front entry to incorporate, and additional design and detail to, support the architectural theme Additionally, accent features such as vents and louvers should be incorporated 7 Provide details on all of the lighting fixtures. Fixtures which reflect the design ofthe homes vnll add impact to the overall architectural theme 8. On the west elevation, extend the siding from the roofline down to temm~ate atthe window tnm for additional architectural detail. ~~-~ro • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p m. Emily Cameron June 14, 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT17009 - W ILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to subdivide one common lot for residential condominium purposes on 1 08 acre of land in the Medwm Residential Distnct (8-14 dwellmg units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route - APN 0207-262-02. Related File: Development Review DRC2003-01062. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01062- WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to develop 8 residential condominium units on 1 08 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distnct (8-14 dwellmg units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue - APN' 0207-262-02. Comments. The Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed this protect on May 3, 2005, and requested the following changes. Revised plans will be available at the meeting. 1 Because of the prominent placement of the garages, a trellis feature or srmilarfeature shall be incorporated to soften the front elevation. 2. Provide stonework all the way around the chimneys The applicant may use the veneer brick presented at the meeting, as conceptually approved. 3. Provide additional detail on the sliding glass doors to include mullions or a similar upgrade to the rear (north) elevation. 4 Revise elevations to incorporate additional color palettes for the bnck veneer. Additionally, the Committee would like further contrast in the overall color palette for the homes 5. Provide additional rafter tails to all four sides of the homes The roof eaves shall incorporate large beams at the end of the roofline. 6. Revise the window above the front entry to incorporate, and add additional design and detail to support, the architectural theme. Additionally, accent features such as vents and louvers should be incorporated 7. Prowde details on all of the lighting fixtures Fixtures which reflect the design of the homes will add impact to the overall architectural theme. 8 On the west elevation, extend the siding from the roofline down to terminate at the window tnm for additional architectural detail. Staff Recommendation: Staffs recommendation will be provided at the meeting following review of revised plans. u ~~1 Il DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT17009 AND DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS June 14, 2005 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Fletcher, McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner: Emily Cameron The applicant presented revised elevations and materials sample board. The Committee felt that the revised plans addressed all of their previous recommendations The Committee recommended approval subject to: 1) Repeating on the minor gable on the west elevations the horizontal siding and details of the mayor gables. 2) Repeating the gable beams on the 1 st floor gable of the west elevations. Nis is ,, GTy orRandro Cucamonga flamm~p DMSxn (908) 477.2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using Ink Use fhe tab key to move hnm one Ilne to fhe next l/rre.) The purpose of this form is to inform the~City of the-basic components of the proposed project`so,that the•City, may review the projectpursuant to_City~Policies„Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California EnvironmentaL• Q~uaiity Act; and the City's Rules and 1'rocedures,to~,Implement,CEQA. It is impottanf>thatthe information requested, in this application'tie'pcovidedinfull. • . _•-, •~ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d is the responstblldy ofthe applkanf to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submrttal, Cdy statT xall not be evadable to pedorm work regwred to provide missmg information Appl~cabon Number for the project to which this /orm pertains ~Q~ ~03 ~ fl ~ ~ ~ Z Protect Title Name 8 Address of protect owner(s) VI N Cfi~Ft'~, ~I ~ ~ZF~-~Q 2r~ B~ RAZ7~rl~i U 171A• Mott' l7 '! I CAr q I'1 b S Cao~iZ~t -Z~s~ Name 6 Address of developer or protect sponsor ~rN'1'B Ae 5 f7 W N ~ Cordact Perron 8 Address 9AMC_ AS "~*26DiJ 1~21:>?~ N4]'r•41h ~CRM " Name 8 Address of person preparing this form (d drfierent from above) C~i~ ~~ ~ ~I ~ {~.q~~/ ~~ w•pwln Mh GN~Ilxo e.~ci•--,ri,~~ 216 N Secv~l b 1~v~. 6 Tele Number (q o~l~ q ~I ..[rj l 66 ~~»~'._ ~-~oql q g ~ -7 Zo 7 EnN mentallydoForml doe Page 1 of 9 ~ d' ~ ~ 3 Created on SI222002 4 09 PM PROJECT INFORMATION 8 DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk (J is not regmred of nonconsiruction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Provide a toll scale (8-i/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and rnd~cate the sde 6oundanes 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show repn;sentahve views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the sde, and representative views of signfcant features from the site Incude a map showing location o/each photograph. 3) Pro/ect Location (describe) ~ (~ 5 MDiDRDV~1~i k~ 5D0 ~'f ~xafA DF n-ir P~Tw E£ N /i4.2o W t~wY H~rr~RouF avt}. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet d necessary) A'}f~R"~ MDR 8~l~r' ~1 F>D,C+~ ' 2l. ~LcC.1c.' 26Z t-yf ' 2 'S) Gross Sde Area (adsq fl ): ~. ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ 3 ~ . Z sly 'fi) Net Site Ala (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed Q ~ ~ ~ q O fi $ ~' dedications). ~ ~ Describe any proposed general plan amendment or mne change whrch would affect the piolect site (attach additional sheet d necessary) Nf~ 8) Include a description of all permits whrch will be necessary hom fhe Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order fo linty implement the profeck ~h'Yo~ ggltcatocucatw.ontt',ce~ Pn.ill,blt~u y1~,ortlT C~TYo>r ~gr.1C~.FO cuckn~alaA- uNIFdRM AflPUc.A~t-tai.! ~aa. bA.c1.,A+-~.w- /b~l~tl .crJ 9) Describe the physics! setting oI the site as rt exists before the protect including information an topography, soil stability, plairts and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on sde (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant (eatures described In addd~on, cite all sources of information (i e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheological surveys, traffic studies) .Oc~~- '9'C W I'S'1k f..l O . EnNrenmentallnfoForml doe Page 2 of 9 ~ .r- S ~ ~' Created an 5222002 409 PM 1O) Descnbe the known cultural and/or htsfoncal aspects of the sde Cde all sources of ~n/ormabon (books, published reports and o21 history) _nf~.A- T' i l) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now af/ect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ect m detail Thts should provide an adequate descnpbon of the stte m ferms of ultrmate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect lnd~cate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development fo occur wtth each phase, end the anfrolpated completion of each increment Aftach adddional sheet(s) r/necessary B (~ C FsNronmentallnfoFonnt doc Page 3 of 9 I.., .~ S ~ Created on Sf2212002 4.09 PM 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, lnctudmg mformabon on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate fhe type olland use (res~denbal, commero~al, etc.), intensify of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale o/development (height, (rootage, setback, rear yard, etc.). NoQTL1 h1bG.- ~fl~,1,I T 5~1JG ~,M ~ A 1 j0~k 11 II 1 dDhl' 9 ~I MLIU~ ('~Qd" -1ZP~T~r(~ I~~j -~ II ~ Q ~ ~~~~' ~If 14) Will the proposed project change the patfem, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pm/ecf? ~~~ , E Sup~ouunauu tF,p~ wiN. IM9fiCNP A-wn-G NORr~4 Slue of MOrbP.fli~ ,4vE amp coM~~-~Tl~11~~ tte~ibE-~+tt'K. . __~~,r~or~tv,~-H-ro_~~ ,k.ao ra5r 15) Indicate the type o/short-term and long-temr noise to be generated, mGudmg source and amount How wdl these nose levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed ~ c°"~T-a'a-~S'~ uu~sn t~uwt.,c ~,a-~-~..t S~ta~rc ~ ~~u~,o~F~~' G1rY . No UNUSua~ LoNa t6¢M NO15E '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees ~~p 17) Indicate any bodes of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the sde drams N ~ EnNronmentallMaFamt doG Page 4 of 9 ~ ~ S (~ CreateC on 5r222002 409 PM 18) Indicate expected amoun~wafer usage (See Attachment A forusage esirmates) For further clanficafron, please contact the Cucamonga County Wal1ter Orstncf at 987-2591 gg~~,,~~ ` a Resrdental (gal/day~___`iPeak use (gal/Day) ~q~ . b CommercraUlnd (gal/day/ac)7 Peak use (gal/mrn/ac) ,,,~ ~~ 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Seplrc Tank Y~sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests I/discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficatron, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drslnct a1987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gal/day) 2~~~~ ~~~ b Commerc~al/Induslnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of resrdenhal units Detached (md~cate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze Attached (indicate whether units are rental or (or sale ands) ~~ 0. 21) Antic~paled range of sale pnces and/ rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $_ tp $ ~~_ 22) Specdy number ofbedrooms by unit type ~l\ ~ lpco`ACc lhL 23) Indicate anhcrpated household srze by unit type ~ ~ ~ l'S 8~S H EnvlronrtrenkllnfoFOrm7 doc Page 5 of 8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ Created on 522/1002 4.09 PM 24) Indicate the expelled number o/school children who wdl be residing wifhin the prolecY. Contact the appropnate School Distracts as shown in Attachment B a. Elementary: 6 6. Junior High. 6 c SeniorWgh COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commercial, industnal or instBubonal uses• 26) Total Boor area of commercial, indusfnal, or insBlutronal uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operabon• 28) Numbero/employees ShrR- Time of 29) Provide breakdown of anbcepatedlob c rate of hire for each Gassficabon (aftae Shift: :siBcabons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cabon of the adddional sheet d necessary)• 30) Estimation of the umber of workers to be hued that currendy reside in the City '31) fror commerce I and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified ugh the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract, at (818) 572-6283) EnNronmantallnfoFortnl doc Page 6 of 9 ~ (, Created on 5222002 4.09 PM • ! ~ ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and Aood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to determine their abilrt prowde adequate sernce to the proposed pro/ect7 If so, please indicate then 2sponse ~~ 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limned to PCB's, radioactive substa~ pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable ligwds and gases A/so note underground sk of any o/ the above. Please list the matenals and descnbe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, a. as the dates of use, !f known. 34) Will the proposed protect Involve the temporary along-feint use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples Iwted above? if yes, prowde an inventory of all such matena be used and proposed method of disposal The /ocadon of such uses, along wdh the storage and shipment areas shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cabon plans ~~ I hereby cerbty that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibds present the data and udormabon requu adequate evaluation of this proled to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and ~ tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may 6e required to be submitted bet adequate eva/uabon can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date• ~ ~ ~~ Signature' rltle. ~~ grlq p,.,r EnnronmentallnfoFOrm1 doc Page 7 of 9 ~ o} S ~~ Created on 5/22/2002 499 P ATTACHMENT A Water Usaae Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day ApUCondo 400 gaUday CommerciaUlndustrial General and Regional Commercial 3,000 gaUday/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industnal 2,500 gaUday/ac Industnal Park 3,000 gaUday/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day ApUCondos 200 gal/day CommereiaUl nd ustrial General Commercial 2,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 gaUday/ac General Indusinal 1,500 gaUday/ac Heavy Industnal 3,000 gaUday/ac Source Cucamonga County Water Distnd Master Plan, 6/00 EnhronrnenlallnfoForml.doc Page 8 of 9 ~ + .1 p~,o Created on 522/2002 409 PM ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Swte F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Sude 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-6942 Etrvvanda 5959 East Avenue P.O fox 248 Rancho Cupmonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 ~~~a~ EnhronmenhaunroFOrrn1 doc rage s a a Created on 5r22lZOOZ a:09 PM USES lXuaaYatr owe. T... JI mep prlnteG on 08/03/04 from'7ATP0' arld °Untlr., , ~tpg' 11778'00" W 11777'00" W WG58411776'00' W n ~a n r r n ~s `i.' Ell x . • ~ ~ S h 7:. ~ ~ ~ I 1~ •5't' BHT _ r~ fig. L ~ LINB~~ } - _ ~ x ~ .~ J.'...."i ',~ ~ e • . ~ . NA~ ~ t i t vE _~ _~... R ~ - 1456 ~ ~`~~ \~. . V f 2 '.L • , . ~ :«~ ~d ~ ~ . i Cox' '•a' -_ ~ ~ • ~ ~f/ s ` . i { a x y }~ L ~ . Y i . ~ ~~~•~ ~ _`."^~ ____~_ ~ rte ..... _ _`~ ...... , .~ _ > ~~'f 7 ;-gen. c ie ~,1 ~' ? P }s' 1 ~LrJ ~f~ _ ~~ . ' ' ' ~I q 1 ~ tr Jeb ~i ?'t . ~ /. ~ , i . ~t d.' :O r 1 - C' j' ~ ' J ~ t ' 1~1 ~, L, ~ it n ITV _ • P S• • IJ y ~ \- tlA SfIP - c 1657_ „ C ~ !i sti 1 ! 1 ..... geh"2~ ; - ;V ~ Y r J. 7 ' _ _ ~ ` __ 1 R 4rir A iar... Y • •• A 1: ~ :~ ei~ - • ~4 . yi~ - ~ 3 .uam g __ L'HrSt IGlkf^~?T ~ der ~ `. rk • II Y 1~,.,, Wa W ~ . ..S e1 •...:. •• s _ ~ I ~~ \l ~ '~ • = FOOJNILL ,. " ' o' I~ ~e C p } /777 ~'X,. YO:'~` :'~aa A •' f- 8~~t'~ •~ r ~ it ~ • ~ i '~aa n O. ~+, Hoa Trey I I b ~ r d• {I - Z t C f _ W .. . .. x i ., -- a. ._ ..w. _ -- . ,p .._ _..._~q..._ . -a SI ~~ r s~ , I ~; - ~ ` - ~ ~ ,. ^ ` - „ J s ~ ~ , x _ ..~~ :., r ~ - J~~ caearaenia b d • • ,1 e • v " - s _ ~ • : Ra OwlrE b ~ ' I ~_ ' ~ - ~ 4t :IKASKIc I ~ ~ _ 9eieath Sdt ~ ~ ._ ~____ __ _~..____ _ ~ alga I _ - _ ' ~„n - - : FEEOER g~ a _ of sa M1 1 ~ FS •'• tA. ' ~, J Y~ } Y• \ • { 1 - Cory _ 4' - -Wnerald~• _____ _ ~ J _ _ f0~ ...._.. J ...~ ~`, I 1 1 . ~, n ,~- - - ~ ~ , '~ ~1 0 ; Trader^ ~~ e ~ _ ~ h Park Y _ •+._: 1 _ e Park bE~' / ~- ~; - ~ ~._f~ 1 ~xf,. - ~p ~7 ,r ;= / ~ ~~~ ~Wali ~ ~ ynk Z ~O O A °m 11778'00" W n llin ~~ W re^a TT7#f107 1~ a RCi a SOOw ~ en W d wah TUP W 710Ri Nabod Oea~pha (www W hemeJbpo) N +5 as WGSB411776'00" W z CJ ~_~ 3;<,~ UNITED STATES m-" DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ~~a~ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 34°0T n75a 71C FEF Y. f.' i ~" yy+±..y ~F~A P ' h r.f~~``lr bt ~i' ,r tiirr;~~} aft y: ~.' ~. C . ~~':~ ~'e wr~°~',,v F 1~ f~~'~~ ~~Y ~CYx~ _• firi '<liA~~ 2 t ~.Z w t~. t , _LF r`, ;;; ,, ,, ~2,!;, ~ti'> , b r ,,, ~ ,acs. ,. .~5'z''~, t 1 "y*1 ~cc~~ ~~~ ~4 ~ ~i~K' rJji _'^, u ~ 't.8' ~,. /~~' ~ , /~( ~'~ Y"'F ~,J/_7 ._~1 v_ ~,l ~' '~ w .."rte .~,~ ' v _. ql . I. ! -~ . ,~ ~r~y'va 1 ~ J. I LJ ' / < ~~ _ .~:~_ ~I ~ ~~y << ' ~", r. ±; . , ~__ --- ~- „'~, • (~~~as ~~ • M~sae ~: ~~s a~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract SUBTT17009 2. Related Files: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01062 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request to develop 8 residential condominium unds on 1 08 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distract (B-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route - APN 0207-262-02 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT17009 -WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A request subdivide one common lot for residential condominwm purposes on 1 08 acres of land m the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located at 8565 Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route - APN 0207-262-02. 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Wdhams Chiao Archdects 276 North Second Avenue Upland CA, 91786 5. General Plan Designation: Medwm Residential (8-14 dwellmg units per acre) 6. Zoning: Medwm Residential (8-14 dwellmg units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The property to the north is a single-family residence, the property to the east is an apartment complex, the property to the south is a single-family residence, and to the west is Madrone Avenue. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Cameron Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water Distract EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract SWPPP - Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan +5as C • u Initial Study for SU BTT17009/DRC2003-01062 URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x) Air Quality () Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Sods () Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology & Water Quality () Land Use 8 Planning () Mineral Resources (x) Noise () Population & Housing () Public Services () Recreation () Transportation/Traffic () Utilities & Service Systems () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation. () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the envvonment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a sign cant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred Prepared By Date Reviewed By / ate ~ O~ ~~.~a9 Initial Study for SU BTT17009/DRC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (~) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing casual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime wews in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a caeca corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route, and is characterized by residential development to the north, east, and south and Madrone Avenue to the west The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility Imes and faalities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utildy lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The protect would increase the number of sVeetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which regwre revew for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to wthin the protect site The impact is not considered signfcant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro~ect• () () (~) ( ) a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (~) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing envvonment, which, () () () (~) due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route, and is N ¢~30 Initial Study for SU BTT17009/DRC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 characterized by residential development to the north, east, and south and Madrone Avenue to the west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is charactenzed by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic wabdity is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl The proposed project is consistent wdh the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no WAliamson Act conVacts within the City c) The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route, and is charactenzed by residential development to the north, east, and south and Madrone Avenue to the west The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 5 mile northeast from the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated 3. AIR QUALfTY. Would the project. () () () (/) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitwe receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentratwns? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people? Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development wdl contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the cdywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction actroities Whtle most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the µ ¢S~i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 5 process begins again Therefore, the emissions assoaated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equpment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a prolect- spec~c basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low mission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conforin to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low- pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall Include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City If silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. - N ~-~ 3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 6 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in signficent operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant rf they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-sign~cent The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identfed the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Councl. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care faalities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retvement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, pro/acts have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts fi they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Los Amigos M ~ S 33 Initial Study for S U BTT 17009/D RC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Elementary School, which is located to the southwest Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than- significant levels ] e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are antiepated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect. () () () (~) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any speees identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speaal status speees in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlfe Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (~) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, pollees, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (~) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (inGuding, but not limited to, marsh, veinal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife speees or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sties? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting O O O (~) biological resources, such as a Vee preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O U (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses The site has been previously disrupted during construction of adjoining developments and annual disking for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources N~S3y L_J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 8 d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are antiapated e) There are no heritage trees on the protect site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro~ect~ () () () (/) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5? c) Dvectly or indvectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. J • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. ~ ~S3S Initial Study for SU BTT17009/DRC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bemardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitmty rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited dunng the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago dunng the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary penod, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quatemary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring Is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. . Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect sde has already been disrupted by (construction of adtoining homes and annual disking for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area. No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of ongin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is regwred for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the ask of loss, intury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (~) on the most recent Algwst-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publicabon 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (~) in) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (~) liquefaction ~k5 36 • Initial Study for S U BTT 17009/D RC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 iv) Landslides? O O U (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive sod, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Budding Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes wthin 2 5 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north These faults are both capable of producng Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is 17 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 14 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site sods The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-signrficant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aqufer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic N¢~ 37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 11 unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2 Sod types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand Sod association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticpated. d) The malonty of Rancho Cucamonga, including the prolect site, is located on alluvial soil deposds These types of sods are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These sods are typically brown loamy sand and pale brown coarse sand that extends to a depth of 60 inches of more, somewhat excessively drained, and slightly aad No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a sigmfcant hazard to the public or the O O U (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emd hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a sde which is included on a bst of O O O (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a sigmficant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result m a safety hazard for people residing or working m the prolect area? f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would O O O (~) the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a sigmficant risk of loss, () () () (~) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wddlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The prolect will not involve the Vansport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City partiapates m a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other m the state The City has adopted a Na-~38 • C_ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 12 Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The Cdy participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergences Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for signifaant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site Los Amigo Elementary School is located approximately 1/4 mile southwesterly of the site Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed pro/ect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public arport Protect site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is antiapated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The Citys Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster. Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are antiapated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wddland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fve District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect~ a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements () () (~) ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defeat in aqurfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? {. 3' 39 Initial Study for S U B TT 17009/D R C2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (~) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water qualdy? () () () (~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (~) would impede or redvect flood Flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (~) infury or death involving Flooding, including flooding as a result of the fatlure of a levee or dam? ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflowl () () () (~) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requinng a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction actmties, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would speafy Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to stone sewer systems and other waters of the nation • Perform inspections of all BMPs . Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are requred to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect wdl be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water ~{¢3~0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 14 Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by the applicant (Williams Chiao Architects), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded sods, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, od/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally, through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Actrodies• 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and Implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are lmtiated through the completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction . to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operahonal.• 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by HP Engineering (October 25, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 8) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect wdl not deplete groundwater supplies, nor wdl it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will regwre the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to ~k5 ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 15 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development atywide wdl increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water faalities c) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Offical and City Engineer poor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered sigmfcant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new bwiding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect wdl not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated e) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Budding Offiaal and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-sde No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading actroities associated wdh the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus, resulting in surface water qualdy impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is regwred to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~ .~~ ~~ Initial Study for S U BTT 17009/ D R C2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drams as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibd V-5 No adverse impacts are expected I) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabnel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect~ a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan? Comments• a) The site is located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route, and is charactenzed by residential development to the north, east, and south and Madrone Avenue to the west This prolect wdl be of similar design and size to surcounding residential development to the west The prolect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The prolect site land use designation is Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) The proposed prolect has a density of 8 units per acre and is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The prolect site is not located within any habdat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered speaes of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local eneral Ian, s eafic Ian or other land use Ian? Comments: ~ ~- S~F3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 17 a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result rn () () () (,/) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the project wcinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or penodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 mtles of a public arport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the wcinity of a pnvate airstrip, would () () () (/) the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments• a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at butld-out b) No impacts are anticpated. c) The pnmary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga ~s traffic The proposed achwties wdl not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that dunng a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction egwpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified In Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by ~~$~ 1._J Initial Study for SU BTT17009/DRC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontano Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Cdys westerly limits. No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect: () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated. b) The protect site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated ~(~ S ~s Initial Study for S UBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the pro/ect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated wdh the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facdit~es, the construction of which could cause sigmficant environmental impacts, m onier to ma~ntam acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objecfrves for any of the public services: () () () (~) a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? O O O (~) c) Schools? () () () (~) d) Parks? () () () (`~) e) Other public facddies? O O O (~) Comments: a) The site, located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, and would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 1/2 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will requre the developer to pay the School Impact Pees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered sigmficant The prolect will be requred to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of budding permits. No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 miles from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a declme in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing faalities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulatwe development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Oven-iding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library wthin the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. ~ ~S 'fib Initial Study for S U BTT 17009/D RC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational faclities or require () () () (~) the wnstruction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the envvonment? Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 miles from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational faalities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticpated b) See a)response above 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect~ () () () (~) a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either mdmdually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change m location that results in substantial safety asks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? O O O (~) g) Conflict with adopted polices, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed prolect will generate approximately 47 vehicle trips daily The proposed prolect includes the development of 8 condomwum units The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each condominwm unit will generate 5 86 taps daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contnbute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the ~{ ~- S y~ Irntial Study for S U BTT 17009/D RC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the prolect design The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The prolect site will be regwred to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant pnor to issuance of budding permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated b) The prolect will generate 5 86 two-way peak hour taps, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bemardmo Congestion Management Plan (CMP) cntena for requiring a traffic impact analysis The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each condominwm umt will generate 5 86 two-way peak hour thps daily The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be requved to prowde street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated • d) The prolect is in an area that ~s mostly developed The prolect will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not inGude any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are • antiapated. e) The prolect Nall be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticpated. f) The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capaaty. No impacts are anticpated g) The project design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to prowde, features supporting transportation and vehicle tnp reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILRIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ecf~ () () () (~) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Regwre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment faalities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects9 c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (~) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) prolect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? ~{ ~- ~ ~8 • Irntial Study for S U BTT 17009/D RC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capaaty to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? ~ Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the protect's sold waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste? Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located wthin Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capaaty The protect is required to meet the requrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticpated c) All runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm dram faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Offiaal and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a suffiaent water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontaro, neither of which are at capaaty No impacts are anticpated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the curent City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with suffiaent capaaty to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticpated ~ k~ ~9 Initial Study for SUBTT17009/D RC2003-01062 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (~) a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Catifomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (`~) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection wdh the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as ident~ed on the City of . Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be requved to develop the sde in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in signfcant adverse effects to aggregate resources, pnme farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources Mtigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. Wdh these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) Development of the sde under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dvectly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction- related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts assoaated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels • ~ ~- ~ S'o Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT17009/DRC2003-01062 Page 24 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Su Pni ~ ~5 si City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract SUBTT17009 and DRC2003-01062 Public Review Period Closes: July 27, 2005 Protect Name: Project Applicant: Williams Chiao Architects Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 8565 Madrone Avenue, south of Arrow Route - APN 0207-262-02. Project Description: A request to subdivide one common lot for the purpose of developing 8 residential condominium urnts on 1.08 acres of land in the Medwm Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a signficant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included In the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477 2847. NOTICE The publlc is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. July 27. 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~ssa • RESOLUTION NO.05-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVETRACT MAP SUBTT17009, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF ONE COMMON LOT FOR 8 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 1.08 ACRE OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 8565 MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-262-02. A. Rentals. 1. Williams Chiao Architects filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17009, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map SUBT17009 request is referred to as "the application.° 2. On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on July 27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8565 Madrone Avenue with a street frontage of 116 feet and lot depth of 399 84 feet and is presently vacant; and b. The properties to the north and south of the subject site are single-family residential, the property to the east is attached residential apartments, and the property to the west is residential condominiums; and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 17, 2004, to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain feedback; and . e. The proposed use is in close proximity to Los Amigos Elementary School and is consistent with community goals. ~{~55~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-67 SUBTT17009 - WILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS • July 27, 2005 Page 2 f. The proposed density of 8 units per acre is at the bottom of the range for the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) because of the small property area. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a. That Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17009 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17009 is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17009 will not conflict wdh any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califoma Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the N~ ~ s~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-67 SUBTT17009 - W ILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS . July 27, 2005 Page 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planrnng Department 1) All Conditions of Approval of Development Review DRC2003-01062 shall apply 2) All perimeter walls along the project boundary shall be made of a decoratnre material, including apre-cast concrete trim cap. 3) The applicant shall obtain written permission from adlacent property owners for any off-site grading, pnor to issuance of Grading Permits. . Enoineerina Department 1) Construct Madrone Avenue frontage improvements per City "Local" standards, including curb and gutter, a.c. pavement, sidewalk, 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, drive approach, traffic signs, and striping: a) Driveway to be in accordance with the City Dnveway Policy. b) Provide R26(s) °No Stopping° signs along Madrone Avenue frontage. c) The necessary right-of-way for Madrone Avenue is 30 feet, measured from the street centerline. 2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the protect side of Madrone Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site the northerly protect boundary to the first pole off-site the southerly project boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. However, undergroundmg of such utilities is impractical at present because it is less than 300 feet, and not undergrounded adlacent; the concentration of services to others would be interrupted. Therefore, an in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunicationsarid electrical) on the protect side shall be paid to • the City pnor to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the property frontage on Madrone Avenue. N ~~ 5s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-67 SUBTT17009 - WILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS . July 27, 2005 Page 4 3) Provide fair share contribution in lieu of the construction of the 9th Street storm drain improvements. 4) Relocate existing power poles to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5) The Water Quality Management Plan, dated October 26, 2005, has been conceptually reviewed and the following items need to be completed• a) Protect Categories -The protect does not fall into any of the categones descnbed. b) Section 3.2 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is: "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream.° c) Section 6 -Complete the City's Certification form for compliance with this section. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication. 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ~ ~53~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-67 SUBTT17009 - W ILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS • July 27, 2005 Page 5 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. ^ Schedule actvities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is earned over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. ^ Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric orclean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Guttural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect 1~ X357 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-67 SUBTT17009 - W ILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 6 or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: ^ Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, . with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actroities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediatelydivertcoristruction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-67 SUBTT17009 - W ILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 7 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entenng the storm drain system to the maximum . extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through the completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris orsedimentfrom the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in osier to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by HP Engineering (October 25, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. ~~~ s4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-67 SUBTT17009 - WILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 8 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans forthese areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Nose 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitonng at other times maybe required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The penm'eter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in • fast phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any K~5 eo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-67 SUBTT17009 - W ILLIAMS CHAIO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 9 time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s ~~5 ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT17009 and Development Review DRC2003-01062 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 1 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Fonn will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the follovnng address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department/ 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~-Sb~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ~SUBTT17009 AND DRC2003-01062 Page 2 2. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the project planner. 3 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 4 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 5. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible forapproving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 6 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The project planner or responsible City department has the authorityto hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 8 In those instances requinng long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits ~ ~- S G3 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01062/ SUBTT17009 Applicant: Williams Chaio Architects Initial Study Prepared by: Emilv Cameron Date: June 16. 2005 ~ =Air Quality_ s . .. All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Rewew of Plans A/C operating condition so as to reduce operational yq emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Crty verification Prior to the issuance of an d y gra ing permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City CPBO C Rewew of Plans C 2 denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction gwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatin s sh ll g a meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 CP C Review of Plans A/C y4 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exce d rt e pe ormance standards BO B R f Pl noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 eview o ans A/C p All construction e w ment h ll g p s a comply with SCAQMD BO C Re f Pl Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall wew o ans A/C y4 include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Rewew of Plans A/C through seeding and watering. y4 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of Plans A/C y4 3 L 1 O~ • ~ s .. .. ... .. . . .. ::. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibildy of large BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to mimm¢e the amounts of BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A q accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A q by the City il silt is carried over to adtacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A q wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Construction Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A q haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A/C 4 sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,a) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equpment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of Plans A 4 requued to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, av conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. s 4 G 6 u 2 of 7 ~ • - . . .. Ail residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C y3 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping .Cuitu~alResoq~ces ''µ-~~ ~ ' J - w nk f r 4 ~jn~>k~AK If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to mondor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them far study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPBO C Review of A/D sites from demolition or significant modification Report 3/4 without an opportunity for the City to establish ils archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPBO C Review of A/D g/q incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of A/D archaeological heritage 3/4 Report ~ Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPBO C Review of AID ~q conditions of approval to elimrnate adverse protect Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of A/D documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report 3/4 proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report, wdh original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 3 0~ • .. .- .. ~ , • -. . .. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mtigation measures (i.e , paleontological monrtonng) that may be appropriate. W here mitigation monrtonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D q equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ~ Submit a sufnmary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of D Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a Report 3 copy of the report to the San Bernardino County S Museum. v 9Y ri o The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabtlizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,pemissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted wdh drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Construction emissions assoaated wr<h vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes 4 of 7 c 00 -. .. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A q RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology~andaiVater Quaiiiy>~~~r.~„~` ' ,. - _4.. ,.,,,.-~,nai.~ Prior to issuance of radi t g ng permi s, the permit applicant CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C shall submit to the Bwlding Official for approval a Storm yq Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speaf,cally identifNng Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actnnties entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall b d e prepare , included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed ro ect CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C yq p j that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actiwties are initiated through the completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a mwmum. a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced m southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C yq discharge of debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and CE B/C/D Rewew of Plans A/C yq after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • 5 of~ • .. -. -. .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by HP Engineering (October 25, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for CE /C/D On sde A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of inspection fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submtted to the Cdyfor review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 submd to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines r 1 for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 S ~ Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permitfrom the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e, a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwiding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. No s Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO /C/D On site inspectio A/C 2/4 hours of 8 00 p.m and 6:30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6 of 7 .. .- ... -. • -. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO /C/D On site A/C yq standards specified In Development Code Section Inspection 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, If noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall Immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C Durin A as possible in first phase. g Construction 4 Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, Construction 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, rf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible , the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings T Key to Checklist Abbreviations DD -Community Development Director or designee CP - Ciry Planner or designee A -With Each New Development -• A - On-site Inspecson VO„Yl~1V~1~0 p 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Ma CE -City Engineer or designee B - Pnor To Construction C -Throughout ConsW S B -Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit 80 -Building Offiaal or designee C On D - On Completion C -Plan Check D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 3 - W rthhold Certdicate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating FC -Fire Chief or designee 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP • 7 of~ . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT17009 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS LOCATION: 8565 MADRONE AVENUE - APN: 0207-262-02 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comoletion Dete General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Cdy, its ~~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftemative, to relingwsh such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be requved by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No SUBTT17009 is granted subject to the approval of Development ~~_ Rewew DRC2003-01062. B. Time Llmits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expve, unless extended by the Planning ___/~_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 All site, grading, landscape, irngation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 2 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance. SC-1-OS 1 ~tU ~~ Prgect No SUBTT17009_ Completion Date D. APPL COM E . F. 1 3 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ~~~ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Assocation shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 4. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Ctty. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer rewew and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~~_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 474 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved envvonmental documents shall lie considered grounds forforfed (CANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR PLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint ~~ maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final tract map. Street Improvements Pursuant to Cily Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source ~~ of energy, fuel or power to any bwiding service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is regwred unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except• that in developments containing more than one budding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buldings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development. SC-1-05 2 ~{~~"7z Protect No SUBTT77009- Comoletion Date 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trail Other Madrone Avenue X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item: (e) traffic signs and striping 3. Improvement Plans and constructlon. a. Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b. Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a constructlon permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permts required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduct, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permcts are requved. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards In accordance with the Citys street tree program _J~ ~~ ~~ ~~_ ~~. ~~ ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~ SC-1-OS s }~ ~~73 Protect No SUBTT77009_ Completion Date 5. Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating. °Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are requred, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze Oty. Madrone Avenue Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 8' 25' 15 O C. gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxlcities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only r Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Ctty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs fvst. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. H. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permrts, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D Is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects ~~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- SC-1-05 4 N~-s~~ Protect No SU87T77009_ Comoletion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map wdl be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them J. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance rf no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first budding permd applica4on is submtted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED _~~_ ~~- ~~ SC-t-O5 5 -~ 51 S RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS March 2, 2005 W. Chiao Architects/Szeto Properties 8565 Madrone Avenue DRC2003-01062 & SUBTT17009 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, rndustnal or residential project from the public roadways. u. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Diwsion to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The requred fire flow for this proiect is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This regwrement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provde the regwred fire flow subfect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adfacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. M ~- s ~b • 3. Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed m: 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 2. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. 1. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: • a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radws shall be 20-feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 46-feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 2. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in . accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: 2 H ~-~ ~7 a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The dewces shall be digital. Analog dewces are not acceptable. Dewces shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop deuce must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. 3. Fire Lane Identification. Red curbing and/or signage shall identrfy the fve lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 4. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSG13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District °Application for Alternate Method° form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access. a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for revew and approval, prior to 3 µ~~ 74 recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal: a. The current title reports to prowde a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Provide service to adjacent properties; or . d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please prowde a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site • combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 4 ~(k ~ 79 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delroenng . any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fve Construction Services 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' °Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures°. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Istallation of Reflective Hydrant Markers'. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. ~ ~5 $o • 4. Access Control Gates: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 5 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 7. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraaUindustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during penods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. . Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 8 Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract °Confidential Business Occupancy Information° form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subfect bwlding or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 6 ~I~~gr RESOLUTION NO.05-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01062 TO DEVELOP 8 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 1 08 ACRE OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 8565 MADRONE AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0207-262-02. A. Recitals. 1. Williams Chiao Architects fled an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2003-01062, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Development Review request is referred to as °the application.° 2. On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 8565 Madrone Avenue with a street frontage of 116 feet and lot depth of 399.84 feet and is presently vacant, and b. The properties to the north and south of the subject site are single-family residential, the property to the east is attached residential apartments, and the property to the west is residential condomirnums; and c. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mlunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on August 17, 2004, to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain feedback; and e. The proposed use is in close proximity to Los Amigos Elementary School and is consistent with community goals. f. The proposed density of 8 units per acre is at the bottom of the range for the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) because of the small property area. ~ ~5 ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-68 DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission fords that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and • Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ~~-~ 83 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-68 DRC2003-01062 - W ILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 3 Planninc Department 1) All Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17009 shall apply. 2) All perimeter walls along the protect boundary shall be made of a decorative material, mcludmg apre-cast concrete tnm cap 3) The applicant shall obtain wntten permission from adjacent property owners for any off-site grading poor to issuance of Grading Permits 4) Accent landscaping such as trees, berming, lighting, and shrubs shall be utilized at the entry of the project. 5) Entry lights shall be consistent with architectural style and submitted prior to construction drawings for review and approval by the City Planner. 6) Outdoor amenities mcludmg a concrete table, seating area, and a built in barbeque are regwred to be installed prior to final occupancy. Buildmo & Safety Department• 1) The protect shall fully comply with accessibility regwrements of 2001 CBC Chapter 11 A (Housing Accessibility). Enameerina Department: 1) Construct Madrone Avenue frontage improvements per City °Local° standards, including curb and gutter, a.c pavement, sidewalk, 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, dnve approach, traffic signs, and striping: a) Driveway to be m accordance with the City Dnveway Policy. b) Prowde R26(s) °No Stoppmg° signs along Madrone Avenue frontage. c) The necessary nght-of-way for Madrone Avenue is 30 feet, measured from the street centerline. 2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) on the protect side of Madrone Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site the northerly protect boundary to the first pole off-site the southerly project boundary, pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first. However, undergrounding of such utilities is impractical at present because it is less than 300 feet, and not undergrounded adtacent; the concentration of services to others would be interrupted. Therefore, an in-lieu fee as contnbu4on to ~.~-~ 8y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-68 DRC2003-01062 - W ILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 4 the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the protect side shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the property frontage on Madrone Avenue. 3) Provide fair share contribution in lieu of the construction of the 9th Street storm drain improvements. 4) Relocate existing power poles to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5) The Water Quality Management Plan, dated October 26, 2005, has been conceptually reviewed and the following items need to be completed: a) Protect Categones -The project does not fall into any of the categories described. b) Section 3.2 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is. "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream.° c) Section 6 -Complete the City's Certification form for compliance with this section. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and mamtamed as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, orthat their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. ~{ .~ ~ 8S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-68 DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 5 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time. ^ Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated matenal m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean altemattve fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnppmg. H~5 ge PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-68 DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS July 27, 2005 Page 6 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, droertesrth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediatelydroertconstructionand notify the monitor of the find. Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. ~{ k5 $ 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-68 DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS • July 27, 2005 Page 7 Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the sde dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction actvities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through the completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-sde as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. . 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. K ~~ g$ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-68 DRC2003-01062 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS . July 27, 2005 Page 8 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by HP Engineering (October 25, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a W QMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Nose 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the properly Ime. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. ~~~ 89 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-68 DRC2003-01062 - W ILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS . July 27, 2005 Page 9 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, 'rf heavytrucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • M-~-Sqo City of Rancho Cucamonga . MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT17009 and Development Review DRC2003-01062 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 1. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. . 2. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be m place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request atthe following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency • Planning Department/ 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~~59. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT17009 AND DRC2003-01062 • Page 2 2. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the project planner. 3. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is requred for the specific phase of development. 4. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible Ciry department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Fomt. 5. Unanticipated arcumstances may arse regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible forapproving anysuch refinements oraddiUOns. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 6. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after wntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authoriryto hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 8 In those instances requinng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. • ~ ~' 9a. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01062/ SUBTT17009 Applicant: Williams Chaio Architects Initial Study Prepared by: Emily Cameron Date: June 16. 2005 .. ~ . ... -, , , ~ -• _ .. ~ Air Quality ~, ia; fi .s ~„ All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C operating condition so as to reduce operational yq emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sile for Cily verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPBO C Rewew of Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall prowde evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Av Quality Management Distract (SCAOMD) as well as City Planrnng staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of Plans A/C y4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertonnance standards BO B Rewew of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108. All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Adddionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-silo haul roads. BO C Rewew of Plans A/C y4 S 4 G ~1 1 0~ r • i • .- .. ' .. . .. . .. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of Plans A/C Z4 areas to erosion over extended penods of time. • Schedule activdies to minimize the amounts of BO C Rewew of Plans A/C Z4 exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Rewew of Plans A 4 accordance wdh local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public Construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance wdh Construction Rule 403 requvements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means. ~-' The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A/C 4 4 sail-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Construction „fl Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily ..C. to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A/C 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of Plans A/C 4 altematrvefnel-powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C Review of Plans A 4 regwred to incorporate high-efficiencyAow-polluting heating, av conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 2of7 - ' ~• .. ~ , ~. . .. , All residential and commercial structures shall be CP C Review of Plans A/C y3 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping ~ult'~iral esources ,~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer vnll retain a qualified archaeologist to mondor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl: • Enact interim measures to t pro ect undesignated CPBO C Review of /VD sites from demolition or significant modification Report 3/4 without an opportunity for the Cdy to establish ds archaeological value • Consider establishin g provisions to regwre CPBO C Revew of A/D incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report 3/4 developments, using then speaal qualities as a = theme or focal point 4 Pursue educatin the bl b ' (~ g pu ic a out the area s archae l l h CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 o ogica eritage Report ~ Propose miti ation mea g sures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project CPBO C Review of A/D 3/4 effects on significant, important, and unique Report prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resourc es management report, CP C Revi f documenting the inventory, evaluation, and ew o Report A/D yq proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submd one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 3 Ofi ~ ~ i (~ `` ~O • .. .. ... . .: A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. W here mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report mirnmal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of A/D or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report 4 elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notdy the monitor of the find. • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of p Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a Report 3 copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum 0 o an I The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A q soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During q 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~a Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes 4 of 7 .. , .. .. . '~ Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and . BO/CE C - Dunn _ p ..- RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction g 4 areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to Construction reduce PM,o emissions. ~HycJology~and aterOjty Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant CE B/C/D shall submit to the Bwlding Official for approval a Storm Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical An Erosion Control Plan shall be re d i l p pare , nc uded in CE B/C/D R f P Grading Plan, and implemented forthe proposed protect eview o lans A/C 2/4 that identities specific measures to control on-sde and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actvties are initiated through the completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy penods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be v included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame. Dunng construction tem ora be , p ry rms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent CE B/C/D Revew of Plans A/C y4 discharge of debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff. Dunng construction to remove ll t , po u ants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to storm events and CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C y4 after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debrs or sediment from the sde. 5 of~ • .. . - ~ . • ~. -. .. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C y4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by HP Engineering (October 25, 2004) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for t ll CE /C/D On site A/C 2/4 con ro ing and mwmizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbiades. Landscaped areas shall inspection be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permts. Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water y4 Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into Z the storm drain system to the maximum extent ¢ practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and (~ non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO 8/C/D Review of plans A/C shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with y4 obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit e Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO /C/D On sde inspectio A/C y4 hours of 8 00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 6 of 7 .. .. , •• -~ Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the . BO - /C!D On site A/C .. standards specified in Development Code Section Inspection y4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified In Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be c t ons ructed as early CP C D as possible in first phase. uring A 4 Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take l b p ace etween the POGO C D hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturda or at a t uring Construction A 4 y, ny ime on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to '4" ~ and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any .p construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible .O , the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Reap""' `„onslble Person Monito ng Frequ o o Icatfo ct ons CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 W - ithhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check BO - Buildin Official or desi nee 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy 9 9 D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating FC -Fire Chief or designee 5 -Retain Deport or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citabon 7 of~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2003-01062 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: WILLIAMS CHIAO LOCATION: 8565 MADRONE AVENUE; APN: 0207-262-02 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements Completion Dete 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _J~- agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aRemative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 05-68, Standard ~~ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued or approved ~~ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. • 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~~_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-1-OS 1 ~,d,~ /DO Protect No DRC2003-01062 Comoletron Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and ~~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be ~ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwldmg elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _J~- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits 5. All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~J_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwldmg, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldmg permit issuance. 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) pnor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/~_ all receptacles shielded from public view 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be ~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Forsingle- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~___J- including proper illumination. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ~_I- Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~ owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer rewew and approved priorto the issuance of bwldmg permts 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter. If a double wall ~~ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 14. Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than ~~_ wood Penang for permanence, durability, and design consistency 15 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood ~~ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. ~ 16 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decoratve masonry ~~ SC-1-05 2 ~{~S ~~~ Protect No DRC2003-01062 Comoletion Date 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products D. Building Design 1. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 2 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adfacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all drroeway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 4 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. ~. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or poor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion. 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the protect. 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10% - 24- inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5'1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall i include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition ~~. ~~- ~J- ~~ ~~_ ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~_ ~~_ ~~ SC-1-05 3 ~.~ i o~ Protect No DRC2003-01062 Comoledon Date 6. Property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, ~~ as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be ~ kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 7 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~_/- the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If Located in public maintenance areas, the ~~- design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 10 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ~_/ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval J~- Any signs proposed for this development shall complywith the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. H. Environmental onsible for the cost of t res l t Th ~~~ p e app ican is . 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protec implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $474 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) J. General Requirements 1 Submit froe complete sets of plans including the following ~~- a Site/Plot Plan; b Foundation Plan, sc-l-os 1 J ~, ~ (~3 4 ~l Protect No DRC2003-01062 Completion Date c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including tsometrtcs, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Department Protect Number (t e., DRC2003-01062) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permd issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations to effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Bwldmg and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Pnor to issuance of bwldtng permits for a new residential protect or mafor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to. City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bwldmg and Safety Department pnor to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwldmg and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bwidtng permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6:30 a m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval L. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwldmg Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's °high wind" instructions 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 SC-1-05 e ~ ~~ ~ o`f ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~~_ ~~ ~~ ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~. ~~_ ~~- ~~_ Protect No DRC2003-01062 Comoleeon Dete 5. Provide draft stops in attics In Ilne with common walls 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7. If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum. 8 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same bulding shall be not less than 1-hour fire-resistive construction M. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Calrfornia Bwlding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfomia to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Point maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final tract map. O. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one bwlding or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Treil Other Madrone Avenue X X X X X X (e) Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) traffic signs and striping Improvement Plans and Construction a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights _~~ ~~~ ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- SC-t-05 s ~"+~~105 Project No DRC2003-01062 Comolehon Dete on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Ciwl Engmeer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of bwldtng permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a ~~_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and ~~ interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction ~~ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City ~~ Standards or as duetted by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~~_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permds are regwred Acash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and pawng, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engmeer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be ~~_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for fast plan check. ~~ 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/J_ accordance with the City's street tree program. SC-1-OS ~~.~ ,ob Project No DRC2003-01062 Comolehon Date 5. Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1).° Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adfust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer. Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Gty Madrone Avenue Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 8' 25' 15 gal O.C. Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient defiaencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the Clty inspector. 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to foin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Q. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requred by the City Engineer. R. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects. -J~~ ~~- ~~ ~~_ ~~_ ~~ SC-1-OS 8 ~ ~~ I~., Protect No DRC2003-01062 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved . Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received fron them. S. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for al new streetlights for the fvst six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to buildinc permit issuance if no map is involved. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shat be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable r at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted tc the Engineering Department when the fast building permd application is submitted to Building anc Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. Security Lighting Ail buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, wrth direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 2. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures U. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wdhin 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. V. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irfted from frame or track in any manner W. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime wsibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SEE ATTACHED -~~- ~~ ~~- ~~ ~___/ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~___! ~~- SC-1-05 9 ~-~ ~ o$ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS March 2, 2005 W. Chiao Architects/Szeto Properties 8565 Madrone Avenue DRC2003-01062 & SUBTT17009 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more . than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Flre Flow 1. The regwred fue flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a mimmum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to • provide the required fire flow subfect to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. ~.~5 ~ ~ . 3. Firewater plans are requred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 2. When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please ,reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. 1. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: i a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside tum radius shall be 20-feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 46-feet. d. The minimum radws for cut-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minmum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the mirnmum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 2. Residential gates installed across Fre Distnct access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: 2 ~S' I l o a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic • pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire Distract Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use rn the event that the traffic pre-emptron device fads to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open positron for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. 3. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 4. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSG13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District °Application for Alternate Method° form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access: a. Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property Irne; or c. Is shared by multiple owners; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to 3 {--} ~. S- 111 recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal: a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement. c. A scaled sde plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, turn radii and slope of roadway surface shall be provided. The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement: The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant; or b. Crosses a property line; or c. Provide service to adiacent properties; or d. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e. Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract. The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 4 ~~ tit! All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/F(re) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing matenais to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fve Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtairnng the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' °Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures°. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Istallation of Reflective Hydrant Markers°. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for huing the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. s ~~,~ }13 4. Access Control Gates: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all requred fire access roadways. 6. Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be mtemally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 7. Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy, commercia~ndustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 8. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract °Confidential Business Occupancy Information° form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use m the event of an emergency at the subject budding or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Seances Inspector. i 6 T H E C I T Y O F R A N G tl O C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE July 27, 2005 TO: Chalrman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY: Gall Sanchez, Planning Commisslon Secretary SUBJECT• ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BACKGROUND. The Planning Commisslon Administrative Regulations provide for election of Chairman and Vlce Chairman in July of each year. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commisslon should elect a Chalrman and Vlce Chalrman to serve for one-year terms. Respectfu ly submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•GS:gs Item K 1 \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\PC Ofc Slf Rpt 07-05 doc T H E C I T V O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE July 27, 2005 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Gall Sanchez, Planning Commisslon Secretary SUBJECT. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND: The Commisslon normally reviews Design Review Committee membership at least once a year. It is now time to review Committee membership Commissioners McPhail and Stewart currently serve on the Committee. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should determine appropriate membership for the Design Review Committee Respectfully submitted, Brad Bull City Planner BB~GS:gs Item L I \PLANNING\FINAL\PWGCOMM\DRC Apts SN Rp197-05 doc RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffRepoTt DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM: Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT BACKGROUND: The current membership of the Trails Committee is shown below The Committee meets once a month, as needed, usually on the second Wednesday of the month at 6 00 p.m preceding the regular Planning Commission meeting. Member Term Expires Appointment Richard Fletcher July 2005 Planning Commission (2003) Cristine McPhail July 2006 Planning Commission (2003) Patricia Carlson July 2006 Park & Recreation Commisslon (2001) Antonio Karraa July 2006 Park & Recreation Commission (2000) Brian Zupke July 2005 Bicycling Member at Large (2001) Laura Jarek July 2005 Equestrian Member at Large (2001) Pam Stewart July 2005 Alternate Planning Commission (1999) Martin Dickey July 2006 Alternate Park & Recreation Commission (2001) The appointments that expire this month are shown in bold in the above chart. Members Brian Zupke and Laura Jarek have expressed an interest in continuing to serve on the Committee. RECOMMENDATION• The Commission should now appoint members to serve to July 2008. Respecttull submitted, Bra u City Planner BB:LH•gs Item M I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\Trails Com 07.05 doc 5759 Ifeliman Ave Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear City of Rancho Cucamonga, C]TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUL 2 ~ 200 RFC~[`JFQ - ~[ANNING As the owners of the Histonc G P Ledig house located on the comer of Hellman and Wilson, we would like to take this opportunity to express our opposition to the proposed four homes located 100 feet south of Wilson Ave between Hellman Ave and Cousins Place We oppose this protect for the follownng reasons 1 Most homes in the area are 107+' across the front The proposed homes at 82 5' volt look like a size 10 foot trying to fit into a size 7 shoe Much too small, and an eyesore to be sure 2 Most of the homes in the immediate area are two story especially the homes on both sides of the proposed one-story homes 3 We have a concern that there volt not be enough depth to the land to accommodate horses This is horse property The houses Nell extend deeper into the lot than normal Short across the front, and long to the back 4 The housing market can change drastically over tlme If the market drops in the future, everything goes full cirde, these houses would affect the property value, as they are not comparable 5 We have measured the lots according to specs provided, and cannot see that any of the trees can be saved because the houses Nell be so close to the property hoe A parr of hawks as well as owls makes the trees on the southwest their home and has for as long as we have lived here It would be a shame to lose the joyful sight of their soanng above the land for the sake of money Sometimes one must step back, take a close look at what we are doing to the animals and their natural habitat 6 We object to a vanance being granted to allow the Nndth of the lots to be reduced This is a very low residential distnd, 1-2 units per acre and should the vanance be granted would allow four houses in a little over 2 acres, double what the surrounding houses have This will have a negative effect on all the homeowners in this area 7 According to a letter received from Steve Spies, Peter and Linda Bryan, "In the mean tlme we well be aggressively working to clean up the lot and remove debns and the fire hazard grasses and weeds " [See attached letter] This has not been done The weeds and grasses are waist high and extremely dry It makes one Nronder The planning Commission is entrusted with the responsibility to oversee proper land use for the City of Ranch Cucamonga The densely of the proposed homes, in our opinion, well not be conducive to the ambance of the neighborhood We do not have any obfectlons to two homes being burft on this property We would ask that the Planning Commission deny the vanance at this time for the reasons stated above We feel privileged to have bought our Histonc house from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would like the surrounding neighborhood to enhance the setting of our home We have many visitors from the cwnmunity ask to tour our home as we are on the Histonc t»ke route and enfoy explaining the history of the home Thank you for your consideration ..2~t~i~e~ l.~ ~ Hello Neighbor, I2E Vacant Lot -Hellman to Cousins, south of Wilson We have purchased the vacant lot and would hke to develop it utto four half-acre parcels m order to build one-story homes and would hke to get your ideas or concerns as we process the paperwork The lot is 2 43 acres and would permit four parcels that arc approximately 0 6 acres each W c will include an cquestnan trail to the rear and street improvements on Hellman: ,We :_ artd-any that could be-rem ~' ~ ar~safe"ty+reasonsr~The lots will be approzima e - 2 > feet wide and 3l6 feet deep, we w-tll be askirig for a variance on the lot width In exchange we will meet all the required set-back distances and will hmtt the homes to one story Peter and Linda are hoping to build and live on one of the lots as your neighbor. The attached stte plan and home elegy ation drawings should give you a good idea of our proposal. • We would hke to hear from you if you have any ideas or concerns Please contact us b} phone ur email -- Peter and Linda Bryan 481-0707 pmblsb@earthlink.net Steve Spies (626) 827-4648 to clean ~~~.~/~ Proposed Improvements • Horse keeping properties • Equestrian trail to the rear • Equestrian trail to the south • One-story homes • Deep lots -Over 305 feet • Four-car garages • Garage doors not facing street • Sewer connections • Mother-in-law room area • Office entrance area • Block walls and wrought-iron fencing ~~~ Spies and Bryan Development Proposal Lot Size Comparison LOCATION Cottonwood Cottonwood Cottonwood Cousins Cousins Cousins cousins Cousins Cousins -proposed Cousins -proposed Hellman Hellman Hellman Hellman Hellman Hellman APPROX SIZE Hellman Hallman Hellman 117 Hellman 1 OS Hellman • proposed 1 5 Hellman -proposed 0 75 Sharp 075 Sharp 047 Zimmerman o a7 Zimmerman 0 43 Zimmerman O6 O6 0 75 Average 06 Mode 0 45 0 47 0 46 1 acre = 43,560 square foot 0 46 0 96 O6 0 46 051 O6 O6 0 55 O6 0 65 0 48 0 55 0.65 O6 >N O v / T i\^t~ U W fti 7A Z -5' - ~-I - i ~`'8'cy n __ _ _ ~ _ _ I ~ LL~ ~A~} n ~ i i 1 a _ it-.~a~Y~` iYI a ~ i11ii 9- ~ ~ c I ~ ti~ l Iw ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ;I ''I w I ~~ I F . I,t "i~ i y, } 1 ~.. ~ ii t ~+ r r~ '< -___ ~i - d l i -' `J L ~. ±I 1 . ~ i ~ i ~ ~~ 1 ~~ /A (~~ ~ ,d ~~. ~ 1 ~ ~3C i I ' - i 1~ ~ ~ e .L. a ,~ i~ ~4 ~ ~ ,,, '1 ~' ci ~I - ~ }f `~N~k : ' ~ G•,ry ~ , , , ~ I ' I ~ ` ~'3 ~~ a~ } T J ~_ ~. ~ ~ z~-a-•• si~rsno~rt~~~~'~~C~ y~ ~ ~~--- ~+ W O v / U W /a ~ k .+ 7 M ~ w;~ t' `~ .may' 4 t~~ ~' _ L ' ~ ~~'~ ~ f5 'Y y, ~ '1 ~ ~ i a 4 ii T' i ~~ x ~ ~ f j o ~ I o Ip r.~ i~~ ,(~° = c i, ~ J ~ ~ , 7 i t ' %~i li n ~ ic ~ m 0 ~' 1 ` 1 A~ h i ~ ; I~~~ ~ im I ~ ~ ~ I~ 1~ ~ l ~ '• ~ ~ ~ I ~~, h +~ M ~ ~ .. ._ ;) ~ ~~, -. rH ~ - ~, ~ air. ~ '~ -- - i t r ~ ~ ~„ .~ U 0 O 2 a~ U Ca ._, Q Spies and Bryan Development Proposal PLAN 1 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION .~.u„~.--~.> FRONT ELEVA TION suu ur-ro REAR ELEVATION PLAN -~ ~ --f ~ -;-r;_4 ~ ~' '~ i ~~ ~4 ~€ +`t i ~Et ~~; r ~ ~ k ' ~`~ ~ } 1 ~ ~ + _g t~ir ~€ i +^ 7 +~ ~ h f ~~:Y r YR~~f~~~.~.~ ~f LAW OFFICES WESTON, GARROU. DEWITT £~ WALTERS JOHN H WE6TON~= Y PLRTNERSMIP OG PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS ENTITIES CLYDE DEw1TT'~; WILSHIRE BUNDY PLAZA G RAN DALL GARROU~i MART( P BINDERI= 12121 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 900 OF COUNSEL CATHY E CROSSONI J A DALE MANICO MI JO6EPN P WOHRLEI I AOMRiED IN CNJfORNIA 2 iOMRi[D IN ILDRIOA 3 POMIIIm IN INOIIWG q MMRIEO IN TDIIS s AOMITiEO IN MASSAENUSEns 1 A CgyFORN4 PROF6510NK CORNRPTION ' A RDR10~ MiOf6510NK A550CIATON FLORIDA OFFICE LAWRENCE G WALTERSt~ MARL J RANOA22A~" LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90025-IIG8 Jet DOUGLAS AVENUE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS FL 32]19-2566 FAX (310) 442-0899 FA% Ig0]I JJq-6151 (3107 442-002 IgoJl 369-as29 SAN DICOO OFFICE 1205 J STREET SUITE B $AN DIEGO CA 92101-J500 Jul 22 2005 FA% (619) 239-IJIJ y , 16191 232-3255 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AIRBILL # 7911 4652 6403 cc: City Clerk for the C>ty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civ>c Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Council ~~~~l~uil~~ Jack Lam !! Jim Markman Brad Buller ~~! 25 ~I Debbie Adams Lois Schrader v!~/ (~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ if~7~ - - / . ~ / 1 C ~ / li(1 I CLGRii Re• Notice of Appeal from decision of City Plamung Comm> sion rendered on July 13, 2005 adopting resolutions 05-50 and 05-51 Dear Gty Clerk• Undersigned counsel represent Rancho Cucamonga Restaurant Ventures, Inc d/b/a Margarita Beach, located at 9950 West Foothill Blvd in Rancho Cucamonga, and hereby file this Notice of Appeal to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council from the decision of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission adopting Plamm~g Commission resolution nos. 05-50 and 05-51 at its meeting of July 13, 2005, and imposing therein var>ous new operational restrictions on our cl>ent's business This matter appeared on the Planning Comrniss>on's agenda of July 13, 2005 as item H under its Public Hearings section, entitled "Conditional Use Pernut 88-45 and Entertainment Pernut 91-03 - Margarita Beach " We have been informed that the regwred appeal fee > $1,764 and a check m that amount is enclosed herein for that purpose. Tlus appeal >s based upon numerous grounds, including, among others, factual, legal, equ>table, jurisdictional, and constitutional grounds This appeal is taken pursuant to the procedural provisions of RCMC g 17 02 080-B However, as that prov>sion does not spec>fy the details of the appellate procedure, we are assuming that we will hereafter be provided an opportunity, following preparation of the rninutes and record for the Planning Comrrussion's hearing of July 13, 2005, to LAW OFFICES WESTON GARROU ~ DeWITT G OARTNERSNIP OF RROFESSIONPI BVSINE55 ENTITIES City Clerk July 22, 2005 Page 2 obtain a copy of that record and to thereafter provide the City Council with appellate papers presenting all of the relevant factual, legal and other arguments upon which this appeal will be based. Please advise as to whatever briefing schedule shall apply, including the rime for submission of any reply beef as well Also, please be so kind to inform us, with as much notice as possible, of the rime, date and locarion of any hearing to be held in connecrion with this appeal Thank you for your help m providing us with this mformarion. Sincerely, JOHN H WESTON G RANDALL GARROU WESTON, GARROU, DEWITT & WALTEI2S JAMES V. REISS REISS & JOHNSON/~ 10535 Foothill Blvd , S e 410 Rancho Cucamonga A 91730 By JOHN Attornelfs for appellant GRG•sb LRG6427 WP encl CITY GF kRNCHO CUCAN6HGA LiTY HALL FINANCE DEPAkTOEMT ib50b CIVIC r_EHTEk DkIVE kAMCHO CUCA~GMGA~ CA ?1730 909-471-2100 kECEIPT: CR074942 DATE: 07/25!05 CASHIER ID: CSf0725A TIRE: 16:26:26 F'/C APPEAL CUP 88-45,EP?i-03 Planning Fae~ 1,764.00 1601006 a5~8 CY, TOTAL PAID 1,764 06 RECEIVED fkOH: MpkGAkiTA BEACk PA. TG THE BRb"P .'F DANn Cr AMERICA CITY l~~ RANCH{i CU: AIS~~NGH ALLC6H:i7 nJE•'t-8E2ti tYtit749u2 1.76y . 0t~ Staff Report DATE: July 27, 2005 TO• Chalrman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Gall Sanchez, Planning Commisslon Secretary SUBJECT ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICERS BACKGROUND The Planning Commisslon Adminlstratlve Regulations provide for electron of Chairman and Vlce Chalrman In July of each year RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commisslon should elect a Chalrman and Vlce Chalrman to serve for one-year terms Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB.GS gs Item K I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\PC Otc Stt Rpt 07-05 doc Staff Report DATE July 27, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisslon FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT• DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND. The Commisslon normally reviews Design Review Committee membership at least once a year It Is now time to review Committee membership Commissioners McPhail and Stewart currently serve on the Committee. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should determine appropriate membership for the Design Review Committee. Respecttully submitted, Brad Bull City Planner BB•GS gs Item L I \PIANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\DRC Apts Stl Rpt 07-05 doc Planning Commission Meeting of ~ 0~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you NAME ADDRESS CITY 1 _ ~®~ ~ X0970 /~ C 2 ~ r~ S 1 U~ 3 8 U~ ~t ea..~~~ ~2(~ 3 E r r s ~~ u~ 1 t~ 3~ ~ S~~ J O I~C~ 4 C/`C6GG (~~(~ r~G - ~C 6 ~ ~~ I~`~s~ Viy~~-~i L 7 E tx~n/ l~~f 27 ~lr ~l~~v~'J,~ 5 8 ,;a ~,rG~9.~ /39~J C'/A,~~~ ~7 r, i o U, f ~~ b~ (`nAL~2.~1 ~v~ 11 ~UINL ~'~~LI ,2 ~~~~~ e~r~ oti~x ~ 3 ~ 1 I m b< <-Pani ~w w ~c /~y+ ~ o<t-~o 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ' 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 l,1 GZ ITEM Gam, 1-cscsr~ ~~ 2 c . ~~ Iann V ~Y~r, f F4i/, ~/l~L/ls~s0 /Z~', ~Of-~~3-772~ /?A np-r E ,~I(SFA / 3 t~ 2 ~~~Y ~7~