Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2006/04/12 - Agenda Packet
n lJ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ~ AGENDA 77~~ C CAMONGA APRIL 12, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Macias Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS ~- III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 22, 2006 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be rouhne and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission at one hme without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 - DR ROCKY MOJABE - A request to develop two new bwldings totaling 21,846 square feet on 1 8 acre of land m the Commercial Office Zone (CO) within an Activity Center of the Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan (Subarea 3), located at 10165 Foothill Boulevard - APN 0208-331-30 Staff has determined the protect to be exempt from CEQA unde4r categorical exemption Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Protects PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 RANCHO 2 CUCADSONGA V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are pubbc hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign in after speaking 8 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005- 00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES (ON BEHALF OF ST PETER ST PAUL CHURCH) -A request to develop a 19,000 square foot pastoral center, and an 810 square foot restroom addition to the existing sanctuary, on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9135 Banyan Street -APN 1062-381-01 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01000 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection that will be located less than the standard 1,320 foot intersection spaang requirement Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01007, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01008, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial on 8 21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 Rnrtceo cvc~oNCn 3 E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development District Designation from Office to Community Commercial on 8 21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be fowarded to the City Counal for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Community Commeraal District land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels and mayor hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within mayor hotel faalities as a Conditionally Permitted Use Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Counal for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Counal will be separately noticed G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to develop a shopping center totaling 28,961 square feet including a bar for the EI Torito restaurant on 4 78 acres of land m the Regional Related Commeraal District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway-APN 0229-021-58 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 H ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to subdivide 4 78 acres of land into 5 parcels in the Regional Related Commeraal Distract, located on southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN 0229-021-58 Related Files Conditional Use Permit PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 ~~xo CucnraoNCn 4 DRC2005-00256 and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17938 - BOB GALLISHAW, INC -A request to subdivide 1 47 acre of land to convert an existing, vacant, three story professional office building (shell building) into 12 condominiums within the Mixed Use District (Subarea 18), located at the southwest corner of 5th Street and Milliken Avenue -APN 0210-082-70 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00585 -CIP REAL ESTATE -The design review of 9 professional office buildings (including 2 existing buildings) on 3 37 net acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway -APN 0210-081-017 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423 -CIP REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 3 37 net acres of land into a single parcel for 26 condominium units in the in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway -APN 0210-081-017 Related File Development Review DRC2005-00585 This item wtll be re- advertised for the May 10, 2006 meeting L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to Amend The General Plan Land Use Map From Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor to Mixed Use with a Master Plan designation, amending the Parks And Recreation chapter, and the Flood Hazards chapter, for the development of 9single-family detached residences, 126 multi-family residential units (14 77 Acres), and 2 office bwldings (3 66 Acres) of one and two story design totaling 44,782 square feet on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, and Design Review DRC2005-00071 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action wtll be forwarded to the City Counal for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 Ci~ ONGA .5 the City Council will be separately noticed Re-advertised from March 22, 2006 M DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC -A request to change the Development District Map from Flood Control to Mixed Use on property on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004- 01197, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Tentative Parcei Map SUBTPM17460 and Design Review DRC2004-00071 This action will be forvvarded to the City Councl for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before the City Council will be separately noticed Re-advertised from March 22, 2006 N ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to subdivide 14 77 gross acres of land into 10 numbered lots, and two lettered lots, for the sale of 135 residential condomirnum units in the Flood Control Distnct (Mixed Use District proposed), located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development Distnct Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, and Design Review DRC2004- 00071 Re-advertised from March 22, 2006 O ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17460 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to subdivide 3 36 net acres of land into 3 numbered lots for the sale of 2 office condominium units in the Flood Control District (Mixed Use District proposed) located at the southwest corner of Church Street between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 Related Fiies Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Design Review DRC2004-00071 Re-advertised from March 22, 2006 P ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00071 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to develop a Mixed Use project comprised of 2 office buildings totaling 44,782 square feet for 126 residential attached Condominium Units and 9single-family detached units, on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT-17435, and PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 jtwcxo Cocµ+oNCn 6 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 Re-advertised from March 22, 2006 O ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00339 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An application to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope within a mixed use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Road Right Way -APN 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related Files Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed R ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2004-00352 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -An application to amend the Development Code to allow the development of the land that contains a 30 percent slope within amixed-use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right of Way -APN 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Mmor Development Review DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearng before City Council will be separately noticed S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES- A residential subdivision of 8 lots for condomirnum purposes on 21 acres of land m the western Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Dnve and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right Way -APN 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related Files Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration n lJ n U • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 jjANCeo CGCA.NONGA 7 T ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominiums on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Corridor area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hdl Country Club Drrve and Southern Pacific Rail Road Right Way -APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Minor Development Review, DRC2004-00826, Vanance DRC2005-01061, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration U VARIANCE DRC2005-01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant on property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard at the intersection of San Bernardino Road -APN 0207-101-24 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00637, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 V MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -Parking lot, loading area modifications and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant, located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard -APN 0207-101-24 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 W REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIM ALL STORAGE - A review of the construction and operation of an existing Aim All public storage facility on 6 13 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the east 210 Freeway on-ramp The purpose of this review is to ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent with conditions of approval or in a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or matenally injurious to properties in the vicinity pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 17 04 035 G 2 -APN 1076-331-02 and 1076-341-01 Related file Vanance DRC2004-00050 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 12, 2006 Ct~CONGA 8 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Admmtstrahve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adloumment hme If items go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TO DISCUSS PRE- APPL/CATION REVIEW - DRC2006-00207 -MARK SATER 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 6, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga s+w~ Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers whsle the meeting is m session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and mmuCes can be found at http //www ci rancho-cucamonga ca us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening dewces are available for the hearing impaired n LI Vicinity Map • Planning Commission Meeting Apri 112, 2006 . ~ Sphere1.shp /~/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) ~ Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~,o~,~c~-~-. • n U THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA Cu~ oNCn APRIL 12, 2006 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary o/the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 6, 2006, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Gv~c Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~t T H E C I T Y O F RANCtIO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE• April 12, 2006 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY' Lou LeBlanc, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 - DR. ROCKY MOJABE - A request to develop two new bwldings totaling 21,846 square feet on 1.8 acre of land in the Commercial Office Zone (CO) within an Activity Center of the Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan (Subarea 3), located at 10165 Foothill Boulevard - APN• 0208-331-30 Staff has determined the protect to be exempt from CEQA • under categorical exemption Section 15332 - In-Fdl Development Protects. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Community Commercial South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Community Office West - Community Office B General Plan Designations: Protect Site -Commercial Office North - General Commeraal South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Commeraal Office West - Commeraal Office C. Site Characteristics The protect is vacant land No significant vegetation or trees exist on the protect site The property has no unique features. The site has been previously disced u ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 Apnl 12, 2006 • Page 2 D Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Foota a Ratio Required Provided Office 20,540 1/250 82 102 Fast Food 1,300 1/75 17 102 Total 99 102 ANALYSIS: A General. The protect is designated as a °Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area," therefore, is subtect to the design specifications found in the Route 66 Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan The protect has been designed to include enhancements such as, but not limited to, Route 66 pavement treatment and landscaping. The protect site is generally rectangular in shape with an overall depth of 307 52 feet north to south by 238 89 feet east to west The surrounding land uses include Kindercare pre-school to the east, single-family homes to the south, and a BC Cafe restaurant to the west. The proposed buildings are connected on the second floor by central towers and a deck The Mediterranean style architecture includes stucco, "S" file roofs, Coronado stone veneer, concrete lintels, file window surrounds, and decorative cornices The buildings will sit approximately 3 feet below Foothill Boulevard because of the existing grades in this . block Access is shared with Kindercare pre-school To meet the primary building materials requirement, the applicant has designed the building with stucco and stone veneer. All elevations exhibit a 360 degree architecture and wall movement providing relief and visual interest The proposed protect on the 74,000 square foot site meets or exceeds all development standards of the Community Office Distract, Foothill Speafic Plan (Subarea 3), and the Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan The proposed protect meets or exceeds the number of parking stalls requred for the proposed uses The applicant is proposing a 2-story 21,840 square foot office bwlding, which includes 1,300 square feet of fast food restaurant space. The protect is within an Actroity Center of the Foothill Boulevard Speafic Plan and incorporates the required Route 66 enhancements such as, Route 66 street striping and parkway enhancements. The protect also incorporates 5 patios, enhanced walkways, and plaza areas faang Foothill Boulevard. B Design Revew Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping on February 28, 2006, (Exhibit F). The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) recommended approval of the protect as proposed C Technical Review/Grading Committee Both the Technical and Grading Review Committees reviewed the protect February 28, 2006, and recommended approval subtect to the Standard Conditions outlined in the resolution of approval . A- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 • April 12, 2006 Page 3 D Environmental Assessment. Staff has determined the project to be exempt from CEQA under categorical exemptions section 15332 In-Fill Development Protects E. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulietm newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2005-00287 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C • Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibd G Draft Res • - Vicinity Map - Site Plan - Grading Plan - Budding Elevations - Floor Plan - Landscape Plan - Design Revew Commdtee Action Comments dated February 28, 2006 olution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00287 A-3 ~I VICINITY MAP i • EXHIBIT A A ~ `~ HERMOSA AVENUE • I I ~ I I i I i I I i I ~J x ~~ ~~~ n x n V ~ 1 a 0 n~....~w~ w.....ce~ E n e' rn n x E n i L .,,... .i._a~...... ,, .....,. a.. ~~ K . ~~-~w8 I ,.~.,~ E I F ' 1 I. iG~~GI~~Gm~A~ 1L ~ T () x r r 0 .c r n ~~ L o R U 66 P RKWAY N~i NCEMENTS ~_ _ - i EXHIBIT B SwEEi TITLE x N ~` m Y SITE PL/ ~ +~ . ~ i i ~~ ~I I ,~ , ___ _A _-_s __~~ ! _ _ _~ ~_Z;/ -RUNYAN ENGINEERING, INC. I N ~~ 6 „ Lc]ENO_ nY (~`~ b _ .~ , -r ~~ ~€ I L- L---_l I Y ----J ~ § - i .w I ~~ y IMPORTANT NOTE 5 MIN MRR[NISI plSi<xCE p% REW RCp IROM iN[ ipP 6r Cp]t N4 ip iK PROJECi1R, ~ X' OC IHC SVfPE I PRpVIp~ CCP 14CS Ix I I N.OCK PLLS - iiPIC4 1 1 LERVE 1/2 BICCK DEH [p4 / pRnIWEf aS ICCYEO <~ 0 PRpVIYC [ xlx Pq[E BU0.Q0 l\20 PW ILL 4Ci VPII <fYPICAL, CONSTRUCTION NOTES o- matati M. ,tr t / ~cvx, t- _ . t Q-cwt • r rant Q. _ mRt [ exrc: cpr. SIttvY[Ra m n.r rt p-~,tt t w. maw .E.:t.,, w ,ai [ o- coRlNCt rnla r.~ trtK .wt rE..ro. ax[ ~Ht-Lnrt/.ta~RfVi4MK [.IISIE4IP ill~t 4P 0..w +p-.fort ,aa., nrstc .c o,... m, io mnc,c Qaj-rmta¢r I..w mosrs x. wa ,~Lw1igC! Mt Pw K. y[y 0..w t nW0. St0 Q~CMSrwct tt t r[. wct, n/x ®-cw ,.uct c [oc owa [ ~a o,tt[. rt. xrn0. d vK[t i ~[Rtw,Ct [pG a owNt rtR ¢inR M MCI I Q3-uw.2 aNnw .u..[r t me xw. xnrc Vn. K~ .w,~Kt ---- Rua41NC 4z i u.t. i~ /~ OEfLR A d, - -~ -.a„® r- ° WP r ~ -__ - Rxaolxc .1 ~ I ~ a W ~~ ~i 4 +n" •• ~ l r-_ ry ~/,~ri_CJ n r ~' V Ol°'''" -a wu[mf g [ NLI[ rw YR:u lal¢ ,..~.a „ ,I , , '`~ ~i \lvl ~I _3 I Pp~t - ~, ' ~ __ ~ ~.. ~,p'~ J ovcaco 5~' 1 `I ~ ~~~ pETAIL a s 7~t ~ ~'-- i „ IMPORTANT NOTES ALl R[XlF ORAINAOE SHALL RE COLIE[TEp RNO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAIN$ TO E%ISIING FACILRIES AS SHOVN PER PRCH PLAN PRECISE GRADING PLAN IMPORTANT NOTES PARCEL 2 PARCEL, MAP NO X89 1- Op NpT SCALE THE pRAVINGS FOR CONSiRUCppN Si AKING 00000 FOOTHILL flLVO 2- USE REFERENCED OR rvpiED OINENSIpNS pNIY Y USE BUIl01NG/FOUNDALION PLAN POR DIMENSIONS ORCYOOS-OOZB7 Under ENIIxvR.K aLUN x SOILS fNCIN££R OIIN£R L£CAL O£SCRIPlION BENCH MARKI OplO R°' scunsw om .55RCiuEa °°[""t"^ SeR~cepAlert p. Nw.u PARCEL 2 E! Px HII ]d91 N N I i I SwlMrn COIApIn~n CUi ISai a CY BpfM B2 PWE 11 iB C6 ~ u [o[ +^ 1,S_ Coli iI06~FREE flLt CY ] a.xcxo CuCANONLA a ~~- " r [ A31-c133 ~ /r tct <,tr u:r , v.r NM.iw s a.. anaK [ ~- K i[ wr -y, r: • • '~NI `JN12133NIJN3 NdANf121 ~ 4~ Z ip ~F Q W J W F N W F Q W Z IQ Q W J W F Q 2 '.'„".nv a 4e EXHIBIT D ~ ~ yearns anv aorurasu Hmos wo ~ ~ man» ivuaewwuu '~NI ~JNIM33NIJN3 NVANf121 t 'e M E t I 2 0 F U W, N H Q W J W I f 0 W 3 ,4..nv t 4s • ~~ 31181HX3 r O O r a z o-?a x ~ L' SMEEi LOLL[ m a= m ElflsrE~ooflRLAN RUNYAN ENGINEERING, INC. D 4 63] SOUTH CATARACT RYE SUITE 6 ,~' E ~ ,~, remE° COMMERCIAL CENTER eeu nvan<ne oea~a rwoe mn anee I aalna~ ni~aaw wuu Hume I: a p i 9 31105 3Atl 10YtltlltlO N1005 LEa r ~ x I~ h I Q 3N1 `JN12l33NIJN3 N`dANf1M Ntlld UOOIf ON0035 -T I ~IJ L ~ ~ - a i i sy„"~I \. Q2o Z Q J 0. ~ g3 ~ 4. Z 0 U W N • o~ Q W ~ ~ Iv~)iwgns yppl y~ YJNOIYtlJf1J OHJNVtl ~ i < ~ yw ~agF pAl9 TIH100J Nb~ld b31N3~ o°'g¢~ ~NIlNb'ld °•~~ r -° ~ + s vn~°'i w ~ /~ ( k~ \ - t 1~ \I ~ w~ r r EXHIBIT F A -11 U A-12 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 p.m. Louis LeBlanc February 28, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 - DR. ROCKY MOJABE - A request to develop two new buildings totaling 21,846 square feet on 1 8 acres of land in the Commercial Office Zone (CO) within an Actroity Center of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 10165 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0208-331-30. Design Parameters• The protect is designated as a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area,° therefore, is subject to the design specifications found in the Route 66 Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. The protect has been designed to include enhancements such as, but not limited to, Route 66 pavement treatment and landscaping. The project site is generally rectangular in shape with an overall depth of 307.52 feet north-south by 238.89 feet east-west. Surrounding land uses include Kindercare pre-school to the east, single-family homes to the south, and a BC Cafe restaurant to the west. The proposed buildings are connected on the second floor by central towers and a deck The Mediterranean style architecture includes stucco, °S° file roofs, Coronado stone veneer, concrete lintels, file window surrounds, and decorative cornices. The buildings will sit approximately 3 feet below Foothill Boulevard because of the existing grades in this block. . Access is shared with Kindercare pre-school. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues• None -The developer and staff have worked to resolve all mafor issues. Secondary Issues: Since there are no Major Issues, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The applicant should make a good faith effort to obtain two points of access. This can be accomplished at their southwest corner through the BC Cafe site. This would relieve pressure from the awkward "split" shared access with Kindercare pre-school, allow left-turn access to Foothill Boulevard via Hermosa Avenue, and allow westbound motorists to avoid making a U-turn to enter site. 2. The proposed tenant sign locations and sizes should be re-designed to allow for larger, more visible signs. The architecture is limiting most wall signs to 12 to 18 inches in height. Typically, wall signs are 18 to 24 inches. The developer will be required to submit a Uniform Sign Program prior to issuance of budding permits. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion. 1. All trash enclosures shall be built to City standard, including trellis feature and roll-up door. • 2. Decorative colored pawng shall be requred at all entrances and exits. A-~3 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2005-00287 - DR ROCKY MOJABE February 28, 2006 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the protect with the above listed conddions. Desion Review Committee Action. Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Louis LeBlanc The Committee recommended approval and requested that the applicant continue to try to obtain iomt access through the BC Cafe parking lot. The Committee expressed their appreciation for the sigrnficant effort the applicant has already made on this issue. • • • A-~y • RESOLUTION NO 06-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 - A REQUEST TO DEVELOP TWO NEW BUILDINGS TOTALING 21,846 SQUARE FEET ON 1 8 ACRE OF LAND IN THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE ZONE WITHIN AN ACTIVITY CENTER OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 3), LOCATED AT 10165 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-331-30 A Recitals 1 Dr Motabe filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2005-00287, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above referenced public hearing on Apnl 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the vacant property located at 10165 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 238 73 feet and lot depth of 307 52 feet and is presently improved with curb and gutter, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with existing commercial buildings, the property to the south consists of existing single-family residences, the property to the east is developed with existing commercial buildings, and the property to the west is developed with existing commercial buildings, and c The application proposes the construction of a 21,846 square foot budding with 20,540 square feet of office and 1,300 square feet of fast food, all permitted uses in the Commercial Office Distract, and d The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with • all development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and A- ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.06-25 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 April 12, 2006 Page 2 e The architectural design of the protect incorporates stucco and veneer stone. The building meets the design goals of the Community Office Distract by providing ahigh-level of architectural design with a building that has two primary materials and a variety of exterior colors that provide visual interest to the wall planes. The protect incorporates the requred Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan elements 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is m accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is m compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4 The proposed protect is exempt from CEQA under categorical exemptions section 15332 In-Fdl Development Protects Plamm~p Department 1) The applicant shall install all design elements required by Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan at this location. 2) Broad canopy trees shall be used to shade all parking areas. Final plant species shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval. 3) All retaining walls shall be split-face or decorative block to match the building 4) Any modifications to the existing property line walls shall be submitted and reviewed by the City Planner prior to construction 5) All Foothill Districts and Activity Center elements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6) The applicant should make a good faith effort to obtain a second point of access by connecting to the adtoinmg BC Cafe site at their southwest corner This would relieve pressure from the "split" shared access with Kmdercare pre-school, allow left-turn access to • r~ U A-~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-25 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 • April 12, 2006 Page 3 Foothill Boulevard via Hermosa Avenue, and allow westbound motorists to avoid making a U-turn to enter the site. Ena ineerina Department 1) The Foothill Boulevard Activity Center parkway improvements, including street trees and sidewalk, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. 2) The parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 3) The first 6 feet of driveway behind the public right-of-way shall slope no more than 6 percent. 4) The sumps m the private storm drain system shall be designed for 0100, and the pond depth can be no greater than 12 inches m automobile parking areas (18 inches m truck parking areas) 5) An m-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the • existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted umt amount times the length of the protect frontage. 6) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall pay Development Fees at the rates adopted by the City Council, which are currently estimated as' a) Transportation Development Fee $5,487 per thousand square feet (Effectve July 18, 2005) b) General City Drainage Fee $16,190 per acre (Effective January 15, 2006) 7) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to Building Permit issuance 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • A-~~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-25 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 Apn112,2006 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES. COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT COMMISSIONERS• • • I ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00287 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR TWO NEW BUILDINGS WITH AN ACTIVITY CENTER APPLICANT: DR ROCKY MOJABE LOCATION: 10165 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD-APN: 0208-331-30 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought agamst the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternatrve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-25, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actroities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code • regulations, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the Community Plan SC-1-OS Comoletwn Date ~~- ~~- ~/- _/~_ /~ ~ 1 Protect No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date D. 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~~- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permtts Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permtts 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be /~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete ~ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner Forsingle- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~ including proper illumination Shopping Centers 1 The Master Plan is approved in concept only Future development for (each building pad/parcel) ~~ shall be subtect to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subtect to Planning Commission approval 2 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, ,/~_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, Tight bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 3 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours -/-/- 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at alt times and in no event shall trash and /~_ debris remain for more than 24 hours 5 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only " _/_/_ 6 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants • SC-1-OS 2 - ZO Protect No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date a Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/_ exterior noise level of 60 d8 during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 dB during the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or _/~_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, bulding materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise speafied herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 7 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza ~_/_ area lighting fixtures, bulding lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 8 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into _/_/_ the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits E. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ~_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in bulding plans 2 For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main ~_/ building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_J_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall ~_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/~_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwidings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per Cary standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, ~~_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~_/ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet SC-1-OS 3 ~_~1 Project No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date G. H. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/~~ residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces requred are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the bwlding shall be provided for ~-J commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet La ndscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within ~_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking ~ /_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/~ tree per 30 Irnear feet of bwldmg 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2-1 _/~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_J_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq tt of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq tt of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted m staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _/~J_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included m _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department . SC-1-05 A -2Z Protect No DRC2005-00287 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill . Boulevard 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems requred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code I. Signs 1 All of the signs are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to Issuance of bulding permits J. Environmental 1 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Clty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of Interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and rf appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked • for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 2 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that ail recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bwlding & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. K. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes MuItI-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a Slte/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, • c Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan SC-1-05 Completion Date _~-/- ~-/- _/~- ~-/- J~- ~~- ~_/ ~_/. ~~- ~~ A -~ Protect No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date d Floor Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2005-00287) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~~_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are requred for fencing and/or walls _/~- 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~~_ Bulding and Safety Department. M. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2005-00278) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant ~/~ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Dramage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map ___/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/~_ counter) N. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/~_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the _/~_ California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39 3 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for regwred occupancy separations ~~_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC ~_/ Section 1505 • SC-1-OS A y ~~ Protect No DRC2005-00287 Comolehon Date 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required Tire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A • 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7 Provide the regwred restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adtoining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ) 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (forconstruction) additional regwrements may be required 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans O. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califorma to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding • permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on the title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the City O. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainagefacilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, • drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees SC-1-OS 7 /-~-25 -/-/- ~~- -J-/- _/~. ~~. ~~. ~~ ~~_ _J-/- _~~- Proiea No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date 2 Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard (c) X 2 X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer- Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, priorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-oi-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots SC-1-05 ~ ~ ~~- ~-1. _/~~ ~~- ~-~- _/-/- _/_J- ~~~ r\ ~ Z lt~ Protect No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date • h Street names shall be approved by the Clty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer _~-~_ r~ L_J Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size aty Foothill Boulevard Prunus blireiana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal Fill Accent Tree Informal In groupings not more than 25% of total frontage trees Platanus racemosa Callfomia Sycamore 8' 35' O C 15 Gal Informal groupings Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30' O C 15 Gal Informal groupings Construction N otes for Street Trees 1) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only R. 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer- Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard S. General Requirements and Approvals Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved • SC-1-OS -/~- _/~- _/~- -J-/- _/~- ~_/_ -27 Prgect No DRC2005-00287 Completion Date Prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED _~-~ u • • SC-1-OS 10 -Z° '~wu~`. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • ~ ~ - District 1---- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS October 5, 2005 Dr Motabe Commercial Center (2) Two Story Retail Buildings DRC2005-00287 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the . spacing and location of fire hydrants a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b. Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are. i At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u. At intersections ui. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bulding c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the faality or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. • d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof. ' 2 I FSC-2 Fire Flow The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed • is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system m accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Pnvate fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire spnnkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 Califorrna Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings. 3 °All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 4 When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 5 When buildings do not meet the requrements of the 2001 California Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprmklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the Califorrna Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the Califorrna Fire Code. 2. Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwldmg or suite's fire • alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be 2 /~ ~~~ obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 • 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1. Location of Access All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet C The minimum outside turn radws shall be 46-feet. . d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i Support a mirnmum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~ Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus i 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows. a In buildings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal • feet or maior fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all requred opernngs. 3 /~ -~~ 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road • shall be m accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before plaang the gates m service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must • be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 8 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the bwldings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an • aerial ladder. 4 A -32 b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access • c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is requred. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger bwldings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted dunng plan check Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is regwred with the permit application for approval . of the permit, field inspection is regwred pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the fudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refngeration Systems • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings r1 LJ 5 A- ~ FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San . Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Matenals Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwlding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fue Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased prooerty which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in venting stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards • FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is regwred to be recorded between property owners and the Fire Distnct. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favonng the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the pnvate water 6 A - 3y mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the . property by the fire District FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is requred prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required pnor to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delvenng any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access- The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements• All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". q -35 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker . indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraaVindustnal and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 11 Hazardous Materials. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the /~-3 ~ • f._J Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and • Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13 Mapping Site Plan. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. u • - ~~ 9 T H E C I T Y O F RANC6O CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE Apnl 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner gY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00810 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES (ON BEHALF OF ST PETER AND ST PAUL CHURCH) - A request to develop a 19,000 square foot Pastoral Center and an 810 square foot restroom addition to the existing sanctuary on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9135 Banyan Street - APN 1062-381-01 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration A Project and Site Description St Peter and St Paul Catholic Church is seeking approval to construct a new Pastoral Center on their campus located at Banyan and Beryl Streets The new Pastoral Center budding will be located on the eastern side of the site dust south of the existing pansh hall and is intended to provide an updated and larger faality to accommodate church offices, religious education, and youth/adult ministry programs offered by the church for its current congregation The project does not propose an increase in sanctuary seating capacity or overall congregation size The proposal involves the construction of the following improvements 1) An 810 square foot budding addition to the south side of the existing sanctuary building to provide a new budding entry and larger men's and women's restrooms, 2) A new two-story, 19,000 square foot Pastoral Center building (to replace the existing 2,222 square foot pansh office), and 3) An outdoor courtyard that includes a meditation garden and "chapel" between the existing parish hall and the new pastoral building Three small existing accessory structures, including the current church pansh office, amounting to 6,559 square feet will be removed to accommodate the new budding The new bwlding will be setback 20 feet from the east property line and wdl measure up to 34 feet in height along this frontage On-site parking wdl be slightly increased from 230 spaces to 235 spaces at the completion of the project The net budding floor area increase, after demolition, wdl be 13,251 square feet Landscaping for the protect includes the installation of new trees, shrubs, and groundcovers around the perimeter of the budding Magnolias are proposed for the setback area between the new building and the rear yards of the residential properties to the east The courtyard will feature enhanced paving, a water feature, and a meditation ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 garden and chapel areas defined by 6-foot to 9-foot high walls and planters/benches Mehx can Fan paltm trees p No sound syst mawilpl ber mst Illed within the courtya dyarea and The Pastoral Center is a contemporary adaptation of Spanish architecture similar to that of the existing church sanctuary building The bwldmg design features vertical wall planes with pro~ectmg canopies, covered exterior walkways, and shed roof forms accented with file The tallest portion of the building is a raised roof Ime and clerestory window that is designed to allow natural light into the second-story youth rooms The predominant exterior building material is stucco painted m a light tan color A colors and materials board will be provided for rewew at the meeting B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Very Low (VL) Residential /north side of Banyan Street single-family homes South - Low (L) Residential -Single-Family Homes East - Low (L) Residential - Single-Family Homes West - Low (L) Residential -Single-Family Homes and junior high school C General Plan Designations Project Site -Residential Low (2-4 Dwelling Umts per acre) North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 Dwelling Units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Umts per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Umts per acre) D Site Characteristics Building records indicate that the existing sanctuary budding was built m 1980, and the existing parish offices were built m 1984 Also, m 1984, a Conditional Use Permit was approved to allow a preschool use m the existing Parish Hall The site is developed as a church faality cons`aduall fslopesran'd dralins to accessory buildings, and on-site parking The property g Y the southwest E Parkino Calculations The protect has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for church uses (public assembly) Church parking is based on the seating capacity of the main auditorium (worship sanctuary) building at 1 space for every four seats The seating capacty at the church is currently at 838 seats which require 210 on-site parking spaces The on-site parking is currently at 230 spaces and will slightly increase to 235 spaces at the completion of the probed, thereby, exceeding the City parking regwrements Since the sanctuary seating is not being increased with this project, no additional on-site parking is required ANALYSIS A hengoalls acrid oblectaves of theeGene al Planaand the development crtena conta nedlin the Development Code The new Pastoral Center will enable the church to make better use of the site and improve its facilities for church offices, classrooms, and space for religious education programs offered to the existing congregation The associated on- site improvements include a slight increase in on-site parking (plus 5 spaces), new ~'~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 ' Page 3 landscaping on the east side of the site, and a completed wall at the south property line to separate the church from adtacent residential uses The protect will also result in improvements to the Banyan and Beryl Streets public nghts-of-way adtacent to the church property including ADA compliant dnve approaches and sidewalks, removal of some existing overhead utility Imes, curb and gutter improvements, signs, and street lights In response to concerns regarding on-street parking, "No Parking" signs will be posted along both street frontages and curbs at adtacent intersections wdl be painted red to deter parking at or too close to the corners Moreover, the church has been requested to instruct its congregants to observe all public parking requirements and to rewew the timing for church services to ensure that unnecessary overlap of vehicles coming and going to church can be avoided B Design Review Committee On February 14, 2006, the Design Review Committee approved the exterior design of the protect as it was modified to address concerns regarding massing and building height The mator changes introduced by the architect were the elimination of a clerestory window element from the roof of the building, thereby reducing the overall height of the east side of the building by 10 feet Further, roof file was added to the help reduce the expanse of stucco visible to the properties to the east • C Technical Review Committee The protect was approved by the Technical Review Committee on February 14, 2006 D Environmental Assessment An Initial Study analyzing the potential impacts of the protect was prepared and released for pubic comment on March 13, 2006 The Initial Study identifies five areas of potentially significant impact such as, short-term air quality, aesthetics, noise, hydrology and water quality and geology and soils In response to these potential impacts, mitigation measures are proposed to ensure that impacts remain at less-than-significant levels Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the protect NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting was held on February 23, 2006, at the Lion's Center Approximately 19 persons were in attendance including the protect architect, Tom Campbell (Pansh Business Manager), and Larry Hogan who assists with church activities The applicant described the protect, presented drawings of the protect, and explained that the purpose for the protect was to support current administrative/ministry/religious education activties Overall, the neighbors seemed supportive of the improvements, but several raised concerns regarding parking, particularly for the adtacent cut-de-sac streets (west side of Beryl Street) dunng the Sunday services Mr Campbell advised the group that they were aware of the issue and would follow up with the church board to see how they can best address some of the concerns and issues Later, a call was received by staff concerning parking on the street corners which impaired wsibdity when making turns • PUBLIC NOTICE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 600-foot radius of the protect site to properties to the north, south, east, and west A total of 107 notices were marled -~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Development Review DRC2005-00810 for a new Pastoral Center at St Peter and St Sul Catholic Church by adoption of the Resolution of Approval Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC MPD/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Church Statement on Purpose for Proposed Improvements Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Plans/Bwlding Elevations for Proposed Pastoral Center Exhibit D -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of DRC2005-00810 • -~ PURPOSE FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING SITE OF ST. PETER & ST. PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH The proposed Pastoral Center will be used to house the Pansh offices, Religious Education offices and classrooms, and Youth Ministry offices and classrooms. CURRENT SITUATION: RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: Our Religious Education department teaches approximately 700 children from grades 1 through 6 Classes are scheduled Mondays through Wednesdays m two sessions per day The first session is from 2.30 to 3 45 pm, and the second session is from 4:15 to 5:30 pm. On Tuesdays there is an addrt~onal session from 5 45 to 7 00 pm. Each child attends one session per week. The existing Religious Education building ~s used for all of these classes When classes aze not m session this bwldmg is used for parent meetings, bible study and other youth muistry meetings which will be a relocation of the existing servlces provided in the existing bwldmgs 7R HIGH YOUTH MINISTRY The religious education of the youth continues into Jr. High with our Jr High program called "The Edge " Currently there are approxunately 215 7a' and 8ei graders who meet on Monday or Tuesday afternoons from 4 pm to 5:30 pm, with approximately half of the teens attending each day. They start then meetings all together m the hall for a general presentation and then break up into smaller groups for a more thorough discussion of the presentation The small group d~scuss~ons aze lead by an adult volunteer. CONFIRMATION PROGRAM: Confirmation, one of the Sacraments of the Church, involves approximately 350 teens from the 9`s, 10's and 11`s grades. These aze known as pre-confirmation, first year confirmation, and second yeaz confirmation, respectively. The 350 teens aze broken up roughly to thirds for each of the years of prepazation Pre-confirmation students meet on Tuesday evening from 7:30 to 8:30 pm as small drscussion groups m the hall • First yeaz confirmation students meet every Monday evening in one of two sessions offered. The first session is from 6 00 pm to 7 00 pm and the second session is from 7:30 pm to 8:30 pm. As EXHIBIT A ~ _5 with the Jr HI program they all meet together in the hall for a presentation and then break out into smaller groups and 9 different rooms for discussion led by adults. Second year Confirmation meets on Wednesday evenings from 6:00 pm to 7.00 pm and then another group meet from 7:30 pm to 8 30 pm. Thts group tends to stay in the larger goup for more interaction among the teens. HIGH SCHOOL YOUTH MINISTRY The Youth Ministry is lead by a youth minister and a core team of 5 to 8 young adults The core team meets on Tuesday evening from 7:00 pm to 9.00 pm to plan activities and other administrative matters The main Youth Ministry meeting is held after 5.00 Mass on Sunday evenings from approximately 6:30 pm to 8:30 pm Tlvs group meets in the hall and dining room and can number between 65 and 90 teens and core members. PARISH OFFICE The Pansh office is open from 8 00 am to 5 00 pm Monday through Friday. Currently we have a • college student in the office on Saturday and Sunday to answer phones and help panslvoneis who come into the office for general questions and assistance. OTHER PARISH MINISTRIES There are several other groups who use the facilities doting the week for various ministnes. They range m attendance to 4 or five up to perhaps twenty-five These would include the choirs for practice, adult religious education classes, and charitable organizations like Saint Vincent de Paul. The demands for meeting space faz exceed our capacity to provide meeting moms during the week, especially in the evenings. MASS TIMES There a 6 Masses offered each weekend and this is the time when the most people are occupying the grounds of the pansh All masses aze held m the church. The Mass times aze Sa andd 5 00 5 00 pm, and on Sundays at 7 30 am, 9.00 am, 11.00 am, 1 00 pm (Spanish Language), pm (Life Teen Mass). FuTUI~ PLArr RELIGIOUS EDUCATION L 3-6 • The Pansh intends to move all Religious Education programs into the new Pastoral Center. The exisring Religious Educarion programs for Pnmary, Junior Hlgh, Confirmation and Hlgh School students well be relocated to the Pastoral Center These programs aze not planned to undergo significant changes, either m size or rime as a result of the Pastoral Center. PARISH OFFICE The Pansh office is expected to continue to operate on It's current schedule and with similaz personnel. Operating hours well remain 8 00 am to 5 00 pm Monday through Fnday. Currently we have a college student in the office on Saturday and Sunday to answer phones and help parishioners who come into the office. OTHER PARISH MINISTRIES Pansh Mlmstnes will continue to meet throughout the week at vanous rimes. Most of these groups will meet within the vanous meeting rooms in the Pastoral Center These meetings involve as few as 4 people to as many as 25 people. The pansh does not foresee a significant increase to these activities. MEDITATION GARDEN The courtyazd environment is actually 3 distinct spaces-Meditarion Gazden• A small 600 s.f. space with Crucifix and water feature surrounded by a 9'-0" high wall No sound Issue here, silent prayer use and visual amenity Main Courtyazd: 2900 s f. space in the center surrounded by 9'-0" high walls, planters and trees and lowered Into the grade Used for outdoor relaxation before and after Educational services and circulation for a pazk like setting Walls and centralized lowered location will mitigate any noise concerns. This courtyard is a similar open azea to what currently exists Just south of this azea, however has a more structured landscape amenity to enJoy Meditation Chanel• 2,000 s f space on the east side of the courtyazd surrounded by 6'-0' high walls and planters. Tlis handscape-terraced area is for a small sermon and sacramental recognirion by the Catholic church of a civil mamage. This weddings service is solely for the purposes of those that were not able to get marred in eyes of church and will likely be no more those being marred and Church staff. No sound system is to be employed. In addition to the walls, a 20' landscape buffer zone to the east and 6'-0" property line wall creates layers of sound absorbing elements. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The Pansh of St. Peter and St. Paul plans to demolish the existing facilities that support all of the above activities upon completion of the John Paul II Pastoral Center The Pansh will likely need • a temporary trailer dunng construction. The Pansh has grown substantially over the past 10 yeazs and requires sufficient indoor operating space for programs already In place d-~ • • d lfltld 1NItlS'8 N313d 1NItlS ` ' ' ~ I i <i i ~ _ ----- ~ ; ~„ ~; HSIHtl ~ ,, E:.' ~, , - r ~ -J~ ~ ~.( Ili ll' ~; E ~ Ll lli i. slillj~ ll~il il'i''` ~ ~ ~ ;, f -- ~- ~ _ i „Ili l a. r llh~; ~li;lll ~,1.. ~ I „ ~ , ~ ~J ~ ~ J ~~ ~^ 1..- ~ \ ~/ ~ Cl v 1 •7 ~ ~ I ' A' i---- ~ 1 i 9r ~~ i 1 i ~ ~ ly ~i ~' If r it i I C~---. ~ ~f 1t~ 1 j~~~'--~~p~f 1'~ {~ + I _ I ~ I ~- 4`~~ ti ~~! r i i I ~% a I ~ ~ _~ '~ 1~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ X ~`!I ~ ~ i I ~ ~ r --~ ~ ? ~ 1S l ~ li ~L `l 1 I ~Z~ ~ J i -~ I ~ ~ I r a tl ~ ~ ~fZ ~ J it _ ~ I I ~ ~ l ___ -. i i i I _ ~- __ _ L~ i^_I!J J--~ i ~ h~ si I ~ Iv 1 e i __ 1 ! r L; I` __ ~ ~~ I ~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~O ~I ~ I - _ ~A. ~ `~ I _J ~ ` I r. J I ------~ I ~-- -- ~~ J ~r' s ~ ~ _~~ ,~._s i r ` i ~ _, _ r IJ- ~ EXHIBIT B ---- ----- m 00 n ~,- a • nE pa vuu vsnawa a nm .w ~~ iun noou.ovnvu mx ~ ~ _ _ .. _. e - ..-~. .. ~ _._ .. ! ~ -~~_ ~ - ^ ,„\ ~~~ _______ _ _. xonTM is~en_ W T-1 i ,oiw v.u v vAS~wi mnm wunuv vu....n »~.:~..~ `J C~ ~~ _ -, ' '""~'= HSlatld lfltld 1NItlS'8 H313d 1NItlS '1 I i 1 <1 1 ~-.• ~~ I pj°iw`+ xw xwnm xwrvnmvaum xawsra mreiwrw 1 1 1 x 1 8 " s 1 ~~+ 1 --'r~A"r--,r - i i i I ~T'°' I .I ~ ~ ,--- 3 E~---- ~! I I I ~ I ! ~ r! i 4 ~ ~~' ,I ~ ! I !17 I I ~ ~ ! i~ ~~a, ' II ~i ~ Iii ~' I ~ ~e~~~°~ ~~ ~3 J cl i~ ~ ~ 1 r 3 Il /! ! e , I___ ~ ! g ~ I ~ ~ !i i~! ~ ~ ~ ~a~ ~ ~ ti 9 I i ~ ! ~ s~ ~~~ I III I ! . ! li -'-~------ JI I ~i L I i ~~ J ~ 1 1 I€! I) I ~ ~ 3 I I ~ ,~~, I I -~" I ~~ -*~9c~ ~ i, I~ 1 1 l~ I I ~ I 1 - ! 4 i 11 ~I ~ ~ Dilll i I ~ I I ~ ~ II ,. I I~III-r- I ~! ii i ! ~ Ime ~ !~; I i l 11,I I I I+ ~ ~ i li ! ! I I II I Y s° ~ ~ _ a ® '~~ ~ I I I 2i ~+ r ~ ~~ ~i V J_ ~~i '~ ~ ` a ~ i Ile c+ I. ~ "~ ~ a I r- I~ e ~ ~ ~~~ I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ I I le ~~ ~ ~ p I I ICI ~ I~ d 1 rkr, ~' i e1 I I ' I: ~ ~ '. 9 ' ~ I °~ I I it ~ II i'I L ~ I i I I ~ I i I~ ~ I i ~ ~ I : I i .~ I I I' I i i i I ~ ! ! I I I I I i_ ! i I I I i ~~ _~. I ~} ~, !_ ~~ f r e 8 9~ ' ~ - I ~ a r ~ ~ ! I I ~I y 9 ~' I ~ i ~ ~ ! s 3 li ~ i I ~ ~~ I ! t .I - ~i _ ~~ ,. I ~ ~ 1 I m ~ I I° ! ~ ' ~ ! ~ ~` ~ : 6 ~ ~ ~1 I ~ I ~ ~ ~; -- ~ ,~ s ~ . ~ , i ~ ~ S B 2 P IPA 61 ~ ; ~ I~ ~ ~ !-~Y ~ ~ ~ I / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~~~ ~ D ~ ~ g I l a _ ____ l ~ I ~ l I ~ MAMPIW >KfMLL LFNM1i 40G4PLX KOIKN RP /M~C.wd'ZS '° ---- =~ : l = ° ~ ~ ; a - SAINT PETER & SAINT PAUL PARISH ~_J ' ` ,~; ~ HSIHtld lfltld 1NItlS'8 !l313d 1NItlS i I i ~ "<~ 4 0 f j Z p T I " ~ ~ ~~ ~~$$[[ {` I I ~ ~i ~., 9 g ~~ N ~; ~ / ~_ 1 _~l c ~~, ~ j _ I . ~, ~; ,- - ~. ~ ~,-. ..~~ .~Q .,., ~ ~ ~ ' `' I ~ EY~ ` ~ ti` 1 ~ I T ' ~ ~ ` a - ~-13 - - - - - ---- ~. ~ a•';;M HSIlItld lfltld 1NItlS'8 H313d 1NItlS hlellhl <~~I ra xa~um buix~an ~xn mouva mwMnrau ~ f I a 1 ~ I 6 ~~, t a! al .I -1 ~ - --- - -- - --- • ~ -1~ __i HSIHtld lfitld 1NItlS'8 H313d 1NItlS i 8 i ! aP _ __...._ ~y~ = ,w, lam.{ ua rwuavr xowwaarxuxnmou+a rmaxxurw ~ 11 l a 1 - 1 I I ~m L ~ IIP i a rv iiil lllyi l !fin li it ~ r-~ ~ ~~I ~ ~ l ---____ ~ ! { y II I l 1 II'i i~ It S3S g ~ ~~ " `~ I ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ jiiil ~ g i~~ I lii~! ~ ~ I~ ~ - _ `-,- ~ ~ 1„ ~~ (j . ~~ ~-J~ ~ I { i { {~ jll ~ I IIIII l PP ~~~~' r l 1 i '1 l ~ ~ a ~ ' ~ ~_ U ° i , X11 ,-,IJ ,; ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ \, ~~ ~ \ lal xl I . ~1' is to I '~ j ~ $~' ~~ I ie y I ~ - ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~-,1-,~~ _ ~, ° ~ I ~~~ - ~ r-~~ ', 11 ~+ I 1 ~ ~ '.~ ~ I - 1. ~1 I , --~ I ~ I~ -- -- ---- - ---- ~ ~tJl _ I 1 ~ ~ i ~ , m ~4 E' ~ 1 IF ! 1~ I ~ I I ~ ~l ~ I r, ~ ~J J I ~J l ~~~~ a' I-- --1 ~~- _• ~il ~ ~ 6 v~ y 4 1 e - ~ J V ~~ I I e '~ I I a I ~ I ~ 1 - __ 9 © __ i J I ~ \ ~ ~. „__.. ~ \ ~ (_J :~L- _ ~ ~ ~ I I 1 ~ ~'~I ~ -_ I ~ --~ c~ ~ 6 tL J `.J L ~-4'~ f x - i ~ 1 ;; ~ i ,~ i ti~ ~~ I I ~~ , ~ ~~ L _ u i `~'r_ T , i ~ ~ ti~ ~ i I ~~---r-- i ' ' , i ~ , - ~ 1 / I I I~ , e y ~ i '~ a ~~ k I . , i r I ~ ~ ~ E ~ '- - P 1-_ -- ~ a _ ~ ! ~ ' ! t ~ 1 ~ -ti i O i ti ,~ r ~ ~ ! Z ~~ IG _.. - - ~r ?~. ~ ~ i f---J- ~ -~ a --~-- _ ` n b ., ~ ~~ ~',; I _ ~ I li !'(Y ~ ~ I l i ' I ~ y ` i -+r i ~ .a I l' i i a / P i ~ r is .T w ~'T I I e j I r - r- € 1 ..~ i ~ , ~ '~ r=i . :~-~ ~~ 't '~~=~ i ~ ..~ a yr i ' - $ ~''S~ ~ Li I~ i r i i ~ TE AAVPW VASiCMLfFNId RP ~~Q~ GY¢r ~ y • L PARISH r a i_,,-r~-~ J 'lh ~~ i" ~ i { SAINT PETER & SAINT PAU ~~ „ ~ , ` t.. ~ ; Y Qt {(u~ ' r\Y ] ~ Y r 1 1 i i 5S t i s ~ { ~% ~'-. ~" ~'~ ' %~ i„~ I 0 1 - ,- : , _ •~, ~ ; ; ~- - ,_ ~ . ~r -,+ L It`s !I}lillfll~~}ii~lilll}1 liii;llllli)fliiiiill ~ ~ ~. Q € z 1 e c ~ ~ ~ z 1 ~! I ± ~~ l i 4? ~' i i G < a I1 1 ~I 11 I~ €'. p~ (~// In~~J ~ a F ~.~Y OO~ ® ~g}~ I o a.~~~ ~ • L ~< I C O ~ S U a 7 m 9 C tl a O F .. Q D Q 2~ U ~ ~ ~ r r U~ ? °z~ ~ ~ ~ p , E z~ = a UQ z ~ -~ a 4 ~/ m T ~F m °' a a. H ~ ~ a W F i Ie ~ ~}_ °~~3 E~c! [[ ~ III e j h~l~a ~ . -1 ~,= r~ - -~ r Crty of Rancho Cucamonga P/annrng Drv~aron (909)677-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CECiA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that if is the responsibility ofthe applicantto ensue roar the application is complete at the hme of submittal, City staf/ well not be available to perform work required to provide missing information App6cahon Number for the pro/ect to which this form peRams Pro/ect • Tdle St Peter and St Paul Catholic Church Name & Address of pro/ect owner(s) The Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino Name & Address of developer orpro/ect sponsor Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Blvd Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Charles Joseph Assocates, Chuck Buquet Address 10681 Foothill Blvd Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number 909-481-1822 • Name & Address of erson re ann this form i/different from above Same as above EXHIBIT D a-`~ Page 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Information indicated by asterisk (") is not required of non-constmct~on CUPS unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set o/ color photogrphs which show representative views into the site tram the north, south, east and west, views into and from fhe site from the primary access points which serve the site, and representative wews of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (describe) 9135 Banyan Street, Alta Loma, CA 91737 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary) APN 1062-381-O1 5) Gross Site Area (adsq 217,750 Square Feet, 5 +/_acros tt) M 6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 217,750 Square Feet 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect fhe pm/ect ste (attach add~honal sheet d necessary N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which witl be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order fo lully implement the pro/ect Demo and Building Permits Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stability, plants 9)and animals, mature trees, treils and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on sde (mcludmg age and condition) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs ofsignificant features described In addition, 1~-2~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 2 site all sources of inlormahon Q e ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brohc and archeological surveys, traffic studies) • The site is the St Peter and St Paul Church property that has been in continuous operabon since1970 This Design Review filing contemplates the construction o/ a 19,000 square foot Pastoral Center and a 810 squat foot Church Entry/Restrooms addition and demolihon o/ 8,559 square feet of existing ancillary use buildings on this property 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistoncal aspects of the site Srte all sources ofrnformabon (books, published reports and oral history) There no known cultural or hrstoncal aspects of this site 11)Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Normal existing roadway traffic Horse that will have no impact on proposed site modifications u 1 J ~ Z I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 3 12)Descnbe the proposed pro/ect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon of the site in terms ofulhmate use which . with eaclhfphase,eand the an[ ccipatedicompleton of each~ncrements Attach add tonal sheet(s)t f necessarypment to occur The Chumh addition (810 85 square feet) consists o/ 2 toilet rooms and an entry The Pastoral Center (19,000 00 square feet with Court Yard and meditation Chapel, consists of 4 d~shnct areas As follows 1 Pansh offices, 3,550 00 square feet 2 Religious Education Area, 5,680 square feet 3 Meeting Room Center, 3, 550 square feet 4 Youth Center, 5,680 square feet Facility will replace similar functions rn vanous other buildings which will be demolished To be demolished, will be the existing Pansh OKce 2,222, re-building 3,350 and Storage building 987 We ant~crpate a 14 month construction Penod starting in late 2006 or earty 2007 13) De~ectse Indicate the~ype oroland use (res die~tial,o omtmercral, el tc )Srntens ty of land use (one'fam IyhapaRment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) Existing Beryl Park to the West of site and existing residential developments surrounding Chumh property 14)Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character o/the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ The proposed pro/ect contemplates construction of new facihhes and improvements and demolrbon of existing Facilities that will result m enhanced and e~aent budding facdibes 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 4 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, including souroe and amount Howwdl these nose levels affect adfacent propeRies and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed Short Term Construction nose New Pastoral Center and Mediation Garden Areas wdl be operated consistent with all Applicable Cdy noise standards and sens~hve to exrshng residential uses east of the Chumh property 16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o/mature or scenic trees 24 trees total, which wdl be replaced with an equal number of trees Trees to be removed 2 Pinus, 11 cypress, 1 Magnolia, 1 Platanus, 1 Alder, 3 Eucalyptus and 2 Ligwdambar Replacement trees to be 7-36 box" Agerstroemia, 7-24" box koelreuteria and 10 -24" box Cinnamonum 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the sde drams WA 18)Ind~cate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficatton, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gaUDay) 60 b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) 3000 Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 6000 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolat~on tests if discharge to a sanitary sewage system ~s proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water D~sfnct at 987- 2591 a Res~dent~al (gal/day) b Commen:~al/Ind (gal/day/ac) 500 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units Detached (md~cate range o/parcel saes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot size N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) wA • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 5 ~, 21)Anhcrpated range of sale prices and/or rents Sale Price(s) S tO Rent (per month) to 22) Specrly number of bedrooms by unit type N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type N/A 24)Indreate the expected number of school chrld2n who wdl be rosiding wrthrn the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8 a Elementary n/a b Junior Hrgh r/a c Senior Hrgh n/a COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o(use(s) and major funchon(s) of commeroial, industrial or inshtutronal uses Exrshng Church (Services) Exrshng Hall (Multi-Purpose, gathering) New Pastoral Center (Offices, Meeting Rooms and Youth Center) 26) Total floor area o/commercial, rndustnal, or rnshtuhonal uses by type Exrshng Church, 10,222 SF Churoh Addd~on 810 75 SF, New Pastoral Center 19, 000 SF Fxishno Hall 11, 645 SF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 6 27) Indicate hours of operation 7 30 AM-l0 00 PM 28) Number of employees Total 34 Maximum Shift Max of 15 employees per shift Time of Maximum Shift 8 AM-5 00 PM 29)Prowde breakdown of antiapated/ob class~ficabons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach adddional sheet ~f necessary) See Attached Job Classiflcat~on and breakdown 30) Estimation of the number o/workers to be bred that currently reside m the Gty No new hires planned but we estimate that 50% of employees n:sde in Rancho Cucamonga 31)For commemial and industnal uses only, indicate the souroe, type and amount of air pollution emrss~ons (Data should be venfled through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct, at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine the~rabil~ty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ I/ so, please indicate their response All agenaes contacted have indicated their ability to continute to provide adequate service to the protect site (~ - Z 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 7 St. deter Fx St. ~a,u.LCax~.o'~:c~Chcu-cis. 9135 Banyan St , Alta Loma, CA 91737 909 9997 9312 Memo To: Suzanne Date: September 9, 2005 From: Tom Campbell Subject: Item 29, Breakdown of Job ClassiTications This facility is for the use of Youth Ministry, Religious Education, and Parish offices. The breakdown of Jobs is Youth Mimstry Director Salaried $30-40,000 per year Confirmation Coordinator Howly $11-IS per hour Junior Mi Youth Minister Hourly $11-15 per hour Department Secretary Hourly $10-13 per hour Religious Education Drector of RE Salaried $30,000 per year Department Secretary $10.13 per hour Parish Office: Priest Salaried $20.25,000 per year Associate Priest Salaried $18-22,000 per year Admin Asslstam Hourly $13-16 per how Secretary Hourly $10-13 per hour Bookkeeper Hourly $11-15 per hour Business Manager Salaried $48-60,000 per year Volunteer Coordinator Salaried $308,000 per year Duector ofLrturgy Salaried $30-48,000 per year -- - - - ~= a-~- • 33)In the known history of this property, has there been any use, stomge, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenalsv Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB S, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rl known No 34) lMll the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, alcng with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~catron plans No • I hemby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and rnformahon required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the /acts, statements, and rnformahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that add~honal information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made 6y the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date September 13 2005 Signaturn Tale CharlesJoseohAssoaates President • 2 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG INITIAL STUDY DOC - 4/96 Page 8 ~ NATIONAL _'~~=~_ ~ I•~~~_tfOR`-`'t_ • . ,- _~ ~i=i'c~/~~`t~ .~ ~ .ti_ -_t ``ol ;~ _ 4 _ __ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ . ~ °l '_~ ---" ' ; '~ ~ ` ~ , ..tit i ~ -~ :. ~ , sa _- ,a ~~ ~ , o ,n y _;_ i ~ .1 ~ - ~ ! _ _ , -1 ti P , 4 1 , . , ' ,_, I ' - - -- ~ - ~ ', ~ , ~ > 1. ;,- , . -a_, : ' ' ~ ~ '~ -~ ~ v } i~ .5 ~ _ m ~BO[JbT)AHY~i •? ~ /il , -~ _ t~~. ` ~~~- \4 - ~ - N I ~" ~ ` -L `I `~ _ ~.: 1 ! x is ~~ - ~ 1V l . ~ ... _ i `~ O `'` n • _., / vi ~ ~ 1 t~~ _~ ..~~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ .~ I ._ L_ _ . P .' ~ ~ i ` /r` ` I`~f / ~ lp ' '1 ~ s3 ~) ~ _, 1 I ~ _ l ~ I 1 ^ ~ ~ i C t - J ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ f i .~ _ - V r `~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~! i~...r .l ~~^ Y.' _ y.~. : l' ~ < )v ~ .. ~ Iii r ll Wetet `. , Wit„ / < i .~ _.• _ ~ II, =, ! _~ . ~ 'i I i _~ ,^.A ~ ,_ f 1 a -_ _ I - ~ -Il -,. iam ~~°'-.$ A N I ~ /~ - ~n I, ~ . .A •1 ._ m ` ~ I ` ' ( ~ ~ ~V . 1 '2574 -.4 r - ~ I `c . ~ / r,8 ~ ; ~I Naler .~ ~ o i . - BM • I A A T I l :'-I _ I _ f ,f ~ ~0 i., /.: ~ _ I ~ , ]; 4 _ TanICS ~___~ Cf. ~~l ~n ~ ~ 1 i I ~~ . I~ > :~, 234] ` X ~ /"//_ T - I ~~ ~_--- _ ~/' / ~ 1 _ ~ J ~ ,r -% _•-i+/_iv as { _~_ _C-_ - ` I ~ ~~ _ _ _- _ _ -_ _ ._ ~ ~ -- ` . - _ ____- ' ~ . .. _ ~ _-___- _ __ __ __ T_. - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'lam - ._ -''4. . l: _ ¢ _ i '~ l ! '~ _ .. _ ~f ~ , 'III{ "~-- " " I • •• _ ~.~, ~~~ _2Tab ALMOND __=d__ST II __ ___ ~ t~J ~l •__A' ~'p • II~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,,~~ I I -, -_ L_~, _ ~__ S 4 _- li ~ l_-'~ ~ __ I .~ -. iL_~ h - II ~ ~ . _ ._ I J ' - ~ ~ - ll-~ "V I, ' S ~~ _ ,f > •- - II ~ I' h 1 _ IRe Prvou_ - I I ~~ fj °~ ~~ i ,/ ~..-_~ ~L.% _ i - ~ ~i y ,' ::,I --..- ~ • it m~ j 1 _ x' cn ~ ' - '9 ~ _i~;t __; ~I ~,I _ J~ 1~~ ~ -;~ _---___ - -a_- noAfl --_-_~ ~-ll _ ~IJB95- - 1 ~_ ~: -F" I -I~_-_~ ____ _ _ u• ~ ~ .,VIII ` I _ Ij~!-j~._ _J~'"--__'~_ _~~_ _~L_ =_ll ~~ ~~~~, I~ ~ 1 y Ili '~i II 1 j -1 ~ .I .. .fir ,I ~ / I~ __II it ~ ~, ', ~~_L' , --_ .a _,_i _ .i' . - g~/rf l i- ~r ~ 4 - ~~ -n -. - ~~~'~~ ~( '~~ -' a .. .~ it ~~- I jl lYbl / uvGm it ~ II ~ v P I h f j _I~-. _ ,.~.uu.~ ~i } __ rt -1~ ~, ._fr -- ~- _,, i~-_- -fir="'~~ , ~a .e,,, it , , l -. it -_J it I ' Tanks~•I ~ III' i• -_ 5^~ -- f lanF ~ L ~I 5" I~ 1 ~~ -- L i a' ~ _ ___~I i~ II -.4 ?~ j '~® '~1_5 li• . ~I ~` --~~i^ I \M' WILSON, I BM,h _ iIAVE •~L _ - w,--- __ - _ - - 1]83' ~ - - li__ ~; ~~ II ll "- ~. as~ ~j~ j~~ ~~ ,~ ~~+~_~(~~~~ 151/5'' 'yii~' .. I ~(I lily Ll I 1. ~ •l. A -' - =- y I'~ 'jf ' r I ~_ ~ _ I, I 'I ~.~~ i~ `~ ~ ®' I, I _--= it r _ ~~- - _ , ' I'. u r '-==-1- - _ 4_ r iii ~ ~~ _ . I ~~ I I_y s .-_ ,L ~I. G', n it~ l -a-_-_i~- -= 21~ , it i rl ~ -V , ~ •. - - A4 a a~ )~ . ~ _ II ~I_ 411;x. *~` ~ I ~~ ~17 ~_ ` _ _ .. `.I : _- .~____- - I lam /., i ~ ~i Ifl . i¢ Foctl Convd;~ d: ~ Alra LOma ~ _ Basln -- dI~•11 Basm ~ IP ~ ~ __ i ~ p -' I _ i f . -~ ~~ I~I~j ~I ~hI ~i ~1 _ ` ~ >~ _ _ I ~ I it ~, ;' Saes l it J~Ji = ___ _ _- - . _ =!=ru~_ .r - II_ , -~ -°~! . +°' ~,-'~ =i, ~I ~ i I a _ __ ~ r _~ 1 ~~.k' ~-.~ ~ i•-ial -.- ' ' VE LE N [I i l ' ~~L~-___= _- _~_ - ~r_ - _ __ __ __~ ___ ____ - __ - . ___ I ' f - 115gq ~ IIII ~ s~r L y ,_i1510 v`1 _ -- _ _ _ _ - /, `~~r HIGHLAND . - ' _~ ,I =-__-CIF __ ` -[{a^ - . _____ _ :_~~ _ - =i _ - - ; - `^ . _ I I ) ,__ __ f b - - a - - - r- -_~-~_~ -~ .i _ ~, - ~, - ,, , p~ ~• ; ~f fi I o r' ~ ~~ . n I ' ~ - - -- -- - a ' ~- i ,,_ _; - ~ _ - - _ ~7 ~ ' Alta Lom ~1 Windows Lrve Local rs~ Windows Live Local . ~;-. c. -, Vutual Eatth 32Ld ov-lf ~rfie SL~3t:.f~ /'_~~ '_n~;-,tg rule ,~-," ~bn - _-. ...,~~, i ""-~ ... http://local hve.com' ;. ~- -_«-~,~~ n,.~~;p~i,n~ ~_ - - ;[Use current map view] __ %Vha1 _. L• ~a' .. .i.cv^O~L ~{i@f2 ~~~, J/ /P1U ~. _~- _ ~~ _: `~ iu: rage i ui i '=-~~r ., ~~~~ 1/30/2006 1 J City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Environmental Assessment and Design Review DRC2005-00810 2. Related Files: County of San Bernardino Site Approval 91-55 3. Description of Project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005- 00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES (on behalf of St Peter and St Paul Church) - A request to develop a 19,000 square foot pastoral center, and a 810 square foot restroom addition to the existing sanctuary, on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9135 Banyan Street - APN 1062-381-01 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Residential Low (2-4 Dwelling Units per Acre) 6. Zoning• Low Residential Distract (L) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is located at the southeast corner of d USGS Banyan and Beryl Streets surrounded by single-family homes on large lots (see attache Quad Sheet and aerial photo) The zoning designations for the properties surrounding the site are Very Low (VL) Residential for properties located on the north side of Banyan Street and Low (L) Residential for properties located on the east, west, and south of the site To the southwest is Alta Loma Junior High School 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Michael Diaz, Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Repoli NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM10 -Fine Particulate Matter • RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ~(,~ _ a Y`~ J ~ URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G Initial Study for nQr~nn~_nnai n City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics O Agncultural Resources (,~ Air Quality ()Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing () Public Services () Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service S stems Mandato Findin s of Si nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed prolect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the envvonment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the prolect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed prolect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed prolect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed prolect could have a sigmficant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed prolect, nothing further is requred ~, Date 3 " $~-D Prepared By Reviewed By e ~ w ~o • ~-31 • Irntial Study for DRC2005-00810 Issues and Supporting Information Sources EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Tian Siprvficant Less W,Ih Than Minpaaon Sipn,hcent No 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect on a scenic vista b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not O O O ( ) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing wsuai character or () (/) () ( ) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adlacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Beryi Streets and is developed as a church facility consisting of a worship building, accessory bwldings, and on-site parking The pastoral center is a contemporary adaptation of a Spanish architecture similar to that of the existing church sanctuary bwlding The building design features vertical wall planes with protecting canopies, covered exterior walkways, and shed roof forms accented with file The tallest portion of the bwlding is a raised roof line and clerestory window designed to allow in natural light to the second-story youth rooms The predominant exterior bwlding material is stucco painted in a light tan color However, given the proposed size of the new parish building, the potential for upsetting the visual quality of the area is a concern Of particular concern is the bulk and mass of the proposed building (i a ,large stucco wall expanses) as it will present itself to adlacent residential properties on the east The applicant has met with the adjoining property owners to show them renderings of the proposed prolect as viewed from then backyards As standard procedure, the prolect will be subject to public notice and the City's design review and approval process where the issue of size and design will be will be addressed Protect plans (including landscape plans) will be modified as dvected by the Design Rewew Committee and/or the Planning Commission, before approval will be granted As such, no specific mitigation for this issue is regwred d) locatedlontthel des Theldesgnvand pacelment of tight ftltureos wilol befshowneonssde Iplanslwhich regwre review for consistency with City standards that regwres shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting wtll be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site The impact is not considered significant ~-3z Initial Study for f)RC?005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 - Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially av~.ecent Wrth Mnigaaon Than san~r¢enc Ne I act Inco te0 I act 1 ct 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project () () () (/) a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with exsting zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is already developed with church facilities and is surrounded by existing single-family homes There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located in a fully developed area of the City and the nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles east from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY. Would the project () () () (/) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plats b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations L J u f3-3~ • ~~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 Issues and Supporting Information Sources e) Create obfectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (~) of people City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Tfian &pmbwnt Less Potentially WiN Tien $ipnifiwnt MRigabon SgmM1[ant No Comments. a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the prolect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construcbon is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aprolect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the prolect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low- pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering ~ _ 3 y Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less marl $iprvlcent Less PotenllallY Wrth lien Issues and Supporting Information Sources $iprvficant z0m ~~ spar e~nt I rv~ Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 regwrements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water t]uality Control Board [RWoCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,p) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxtde (No,), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,p) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 56-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented (~ - 35 u r~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Lass man Signd¢am Lass Patenaally With Than Issues and Supporting Informatron Sources Sigma e~nt to ogar~ataE Sign act t Im act 10) All residential and commercial structures shall beliances,rand water heaters.te high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, app 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) han the popupation art la gee The SCAOtMDsidentifies herfollowingtiasesens ve eecepto solliotogn term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located ~adtacent to sensitive receptors single-family residences, and is within 1/4 mile of Alta Loma Junior High School Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wddhfe Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (~) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (~) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means _~ iJ-Jv Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Tnan Signifcarn Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenitally $ipnd¢ant With MNgaeon Than Sigmfcant No I act Inco oratetl I act I act d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict wdh any local policies or ordinances protecting O (~) O ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments. a) The protect site is located in an area developed with single-family and educational uses, and has been previously disrupted during construction of the surrounding improvements According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) City Ordinance No 276 pertaining to the preservation of trees on private property, regwres that no person remove or relocate any woody plants in excess of 15 feet in height and having a single trunk circumference of 15 inches or more and multi-trunks having a circumference of 30 tnches or more without obtaining a Tree Removal Permit The protect site contains several trees that appear to meet the above specifications and may have been removed to accommodate the protect To assess whether a Tree Removal Permit is necessary, the following mitigation measures are included 1) Prior to issuance of budding and grading permits, provide a tree survey/report of trees within the protect area. The survey shall provide a site plan designating all trees in the protect area to be removed, relocated, and retained/protected. If there are heritage trees within the protect area which meet the speafications as contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Tree Ordinance, then a Tree Removal Permit shall be required and the removed trees shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis within the project area boundaries 2) Prepare or revise landscape plans to indicate all trees retained and/or to be replaced within the protect area Size of replacement trees shall be a minimum 24mch box or larger. (~~ 3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho CucaPa ne 9 DRC2005-00810 g • Less Than s,gmbtant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources swnne~ t ~ow~an~e~ swn~e net rr~ f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur C J • 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. (.~-3~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenLally siam6oant With n,a,gat~on Than sgniticant No 1 act Inco ateE I act I act c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e , San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of the existing church facilities and on-site parking No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated • • • x-39 J • Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Than $,gnificem Less PotanLally Wnn Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~gnfa~ t IMOga~~ `H9^ficaM I Nan 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the protect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the nsk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (~) on the most recent Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O l) (~) w) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) liquefaction ro) Landshdes~ O O l) (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (~) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or O O O (~) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (~) of the Uniform Bulding Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (~) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and ~t is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault passes approximately 2 miles south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 1 1/4 mde to the north These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jaanto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeasterly of the eastem city limits and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeasterly from the eastern aty limits Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signficant b) The proposed protect will regwre the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels ~ _ C.., O Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Lela man Sipnibcant Lass Potentially Weh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources sv~ccm Momo~~ea Swnificcm Nsa 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RWt]CB) daily to reduce PM~v emissions, m accordance with SCAGIMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~v emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~v emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCA~MD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~v emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil type onsite consists of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matonty of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil type onsite consists of Hanford Sandy Loam Soil assocation according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically considered to be moderately permeable and generally well drained No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of O O O (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, nificant hazard to the public or the te a si t ld g crea i wou enwronment~ • • '~ - I~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less ThaN Sign,ficant Less Potentially WAN TPan Sigmficant Mniganon Significant No e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles () () () (~) of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area t) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, would O O O ('~) the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (~) intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments: a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City Hazardous participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a D ivision Materials Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to the chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning waste will reduce the potential for significant d/ or storage and handling of hazardous materials an impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City d ous participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazar that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Materials Division Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to the chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations conceming tile fuels will reduce the potential for significant l l s or vo a storage and handling of hazardous materia impacts to a level less than significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There is one school located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The southeast corner of the protect h l oo site is located approximately 100 feet from the campus of the Alta Loma Junior High Sc Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site d ous inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazar materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport f th h e o Protect site is located approximately 4 7 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset nort flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2Yz miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated ~ -y2 Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Then Sipnihcant Less Pmeneatly Wnh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signs ec~I InMOtipeU ~ Spm atln` I Nom g) The City's Mutts-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban W ildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY. Would the project () () (~) ( ) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (~) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (~) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (~) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () ('~) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 1) () () (~) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (~) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (~) intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O (~) \_ J i3-u3 • • Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Lass man Sipe/,cant Less PotenLally WitM1 Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,pnirtent Minpaaon S,pnin°a^+ "° I act Inco 2tetl I n I an Comments: a) Vs designed to connecit to exist ng watertand sewe~systemseyThetStaDte ofcCaCfo n a) is authornzed to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the general permit The general permit requires ail dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off- site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertonn inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (September 12, 2005), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from syst m yBMPs nclude both sti ucturaaandsnon-st uctural bout ottmethodso Structu al cont olsiused to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Actmties . 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce ~-yy Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less man • S~ynifitant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenLaily sg~d¢ant n With Mnpaaon i~mmorated than Sigmhcant Irtpan No I .act pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Pian, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational • 5) The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in the Water liuality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (September 12, 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed prolect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 268 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site, however, the prolect well not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to ncludes lands arpingf of call non ha dscape aeeastosprevent epos on to Grad rig and DrainageeP an • must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Pj - 45 Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less men S,gnifceM Less P=temially WiN man Issues and Supporting Information Sources &OmL=ent M~eweon son'fi=ent Ne ~ ~nc= .e,ea ~ i acc Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on the site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on the site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is regwred to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm 13 - ~+ b Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than SigmGCem Less Potentially WM1ft Tt,an Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~cM Sam InMOigauao~ S'gni ecMant I Noel drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect () () () (/) a) Physically divide an established community b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O U (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, speafic plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () l) (/) natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Beryl Streets and is developed as a church faality consisting of a worship building, accessory buildings, and on-site parking Surrounding the sublect site is single-family residential development and a public school The prolect involves improvements to an existing use within the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) Church uses are allowed in residential areas sublect to the approval of a conditional use permit The zoning for the site is Low Residential, and is surrounded by single-family development St Peter and St Paul was approved by the County of San Bernardino in the Tate 1970s, with the existing sanctuary and parish hall being built in the 1980s The existing use and development of the site are consistent with City requirements, including setbacks, building height, and on-site parking The proposed prolect will improve the building facilities of the existing church to meet the needs of its parishioners The new parish bulding will provide the congregation with office space, meeting rooms, storage, and classrooms for youth ministries and religious training As such, the existing church and proposed improvements will be consistent with the land use policies of the City's General Plan and do not interfere with other policies for environmental protection As such, no adverse impacts related to the proposed improvement to the church facility are anticipated c) Acco ding to tlhe General Plan Exh bld IV 3, andtSectoion 5 3 tot therGenerall Pan FEAR, hle prolect site is not located within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan • IJ~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Lass marl $i0nfiwm Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially $ip,afiwnt w,tn Mitipaoon Than $,gmfiwnt No I acl Inco ratetl I h I act 10 MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project () () () (/) a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result m () () () (/) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the Iocai general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the protect vianity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or penodic increase m ambient O (/) O ( ) noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located withm an airport land use plan or, O O O (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, withrn 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, would O O O (`~) the protect expose people residing or working m the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments. a) The protect site is not located within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out There is currently a concrete basketball court on the site of the proposed building, hence, activities will shift inside of the bwlding and reduce or eliminate noise impact No adverse impact expected ~-48 Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than $iBn,hrant Less Potenaelly WM1h Than Issues and Suppomng Information Sources SiBrunoam A4apaaon SiBNncant No '. 1 ct Inco tetl 1 n I n b) The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed protect is intended to better accommodate the activities already present on the site and will not significantly increase traffic, hence, an increase in ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect is expected d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equpment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 4 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ~~ I~ ' `i -1 • Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less man SignNwnt Less PotenLally Witft 7Tan Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgmle~ t Into reteo Slgn ficem I Nan b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (~) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect Is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area No Impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site does not contain any housing units nor will result in the displacement of any person No impacts are anticipated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause signd~cant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other peAormance objectives for any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protection O O O (~) b) Police protectionv () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parksv O O O (~) e) Other public facddies~ Comments• a) The site, located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Beryl Streets, will be served by Fire Station 171 located approximately 3/4-mile southeast from the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Flre Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No Impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the nature or pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not result in an Increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site Is within an area that is regularly patrolled • c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union Hlgh School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the school distracts are not considered significant (~-5~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Lass roan Sigrnficant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signs scant InMOiBa~tnetl S'gn,fiwnt I Noah d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 2 miles south of Heritage Community Park and approximately 1 8 mile north of Beryl Neighborhood Park from the protect site The protect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) served by the C ty oftRalncho CucamongauThefprote'ct wi I not regwre he construe ion of any nnew faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new public facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR protected demandeThetGeneral Pean FEIR dentihed the c umulatrve mpact only b airy serv cestasha ul9mately adopted bythe City Counalt The proposedtprotectti ocoOnssrtenlt wi hothe Gene al Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at bwld-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the protect () () () (/) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (~) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) site is approximately 12pm esrfrom two publ c parks yTh s protectrs not propos ng any newehous ng acres onalnfalcil~es t A standardhcond t oln of approval will arequ re the deve~opearto pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above 15. TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the prolect a) Cause an increase m traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) _5) • Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less man $i9niM1Cent Less ~otanimlly With Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~enne~m nMO~~~a~ee slgnibca^~ "an b) Exceed, either indiwdually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion ' management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change in air traffic patterns, including either O O O (~) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (~) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () (~) ( ) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a) The Pastoral Center bulding is intended to accommodate existing church ministry needs, including church offices, religious education, and youth/adult ministry programs offered by the church for its current congregation The protect does not anticipate an increase in sanctuary seating capacity or overall congregation size On-site parking will be increased from 230 to 235 spaces at the completion of the protect Implementation of the proposed protect will generate 84 7 average daily vehicle trips The proposed protect will replace an existing 11,000 square foot bulding with a new 19,000 gross square foot office/classroom building and includes the remodeling of the entrance to the Pastoral Center bulding As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in ' protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections The protect site will be regwred to provde street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that the above described protect will generate 7 04 two-way peak hour trips daily In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local turisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fau share toward regional transportation improvement protects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting regwrement This protect will be regwred, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of bulding permit The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated 3 -5 2 Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 LeSS Than Significant Less Potentially Wah 7tian Issues and Supporting InformaUOn Sources cCm sgniL ~o~,a, s'gn,e M~ I "e a I ea G c) Located approximately 4 7 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that is entirely developed The protect will be required to provide any street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site as required by the City Engineer The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and wdl, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticpated i) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code for church uses (public assembly) Church parking is based on seating capacity of the main worship (sanctuary) building at 1 space forevery four seats Seating capacity at the church is currently at 838 seats which require 210 on-site parking spaces On-site parking is currently at 230 spaces and will slightly increase to 235 spaces at the completion of the protect, thereby, meeting City parking requirements Since sanctuary seating is not being increased with this protect, no additional on-site parking is regwred g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () ('~) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () ('~) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to O O O (/) accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste -, • • I`j-~J Initial Study for DRC2005-00810 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Tfian S~praficam Less Potentially Witfi Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sign'ficant M,ogaeon $,9rufitent Na I act Inco ratetl ~ ct ~ Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is requred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Duality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontaro, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Ouality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are antiapated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect compiles with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated • 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly 3-5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00810 Page 26 Less man S'gnificant Less Potenfially WiN Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signficant Mitigaaon Significant No 1 act Into 2ted I an I an Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were essPthan-signif cant levelsth As such, the City adopted atSt teme tl of Override g Co s derations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update againstTheseibefnefits unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required c) eDffects on human bemgsUether de ectly orendiarectlys The Ind a Stuldy dentifies const uct on-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at iess- than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effeDcts The effects dent fled above for ithis prolectrwel a withingthe s opeaof rand adequately 15063(c)(3)( ) licable le ai standards, and such effects analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to app 9 were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review PP~)he City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that a I (/) General Plan FEIR _ (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Pian Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) i~ -5 5 • Inttial Study for DRC2005-00810 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Than Sigmhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenaally Sign act Wan 1nMO o ~ Than S~gnific`nt ' Noah APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature ~ ~~ Date Print Name and Title ~~rIL`S ~` OSE GC ~"u"fib DCra-~ 13- s b - _ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review m accordance with the Cali/orn~a Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 0/the Public Resources Code. Protect File No.: Design Review DRC2005-00810 Public Review Period Closes: April 12, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 9135 Banyan Street - APN:1062-381-01 Project Description: A request to develop a 19,000 square foot pastoral center, and a 810 square foot restroom addition to the existing sanctuary, on 5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but. (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project fde and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (sos) a77-2sa7. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • April 12 2006 Date of Determination Adopted By (~- 5 8 RESOLUTION NO 06-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00810, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF A NEW 19,000 SQUARE FOOT PASTORAL CENTER AND AN 810 SQUARE FOOT RESTROOM ADDITION TO THE EXISTING SANCTUARY, AT ST PETER AND ST. PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH, ON 5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 9135 BANYAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1062-381-01 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates, on behalf of St. Peter and St Paul Church, filed an application for Development Review DRC2005-00810, for the review and approval of a 19,000 square foot Pastoral Center and an 810 square foot restroom addition to the existing sanctuary, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to 5 acres of property located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Beryl Streets, and b. The protect site is surrounded by single-family homes on large lots. The zoning designations for the properties surrounding the site are Very Low (VL) Residential for properties located on the north side of Banyan Street, and Low (L) Residential for properties located on the east, west, and south of the site To the southwest is Aita Loma Junior High School, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mtunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and f~-5~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 d The protect design meets or exceeds the Development Standards for setbacks, building height, landscaping, and regwred on-site parking, and e The design and exterior materials of the Pastoral Center and restroom addition to the main sanctuary are intended to complement the contemporary Spanish architecture of the existing church sanctuary budding, providing a unified design, a goal of the General Plan; and f On February 23, 2006, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting to solicit public comments 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain potentially significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the ~'~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application sublect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference• Pianning Department 1) This approval is for the Site Plan, exterior building design, and landscaping fora 19,000 square foot Pastoral Center, and 810 square foot restroom addition to the existing sanctuary at the sublect site. Plans submitted for plan check shall conform to the plans approved by the Design Review Committee on February 14, 2006, and final Planning Commission prolect approval on April 12, 2006 2) No exterior changes to the design of the prolect, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City Planner review and approval 3) Use of the Pastoral Center shall be limited to the administrative, religious education, and parish ministries/programs of the existing church. Any expansion in the use of the Pastoral Center (e.g , parochial school) shall not be initiated without prior City Planner review and approval of such use(s) 4) The design of decorative metal fences, gates, and/or railings shall be submitted for City Planner revew and approval during plan check. All decorative exterior metal elements shall be a powder coat paint finish. 5) No exterior wall mounted light fixtures shah be placed on the east side of the Pastoral Center All other light fixtures shall be fully shielded and directed downward to the sublect property. 6) All window areas on the east side of the Pastoral Center shall be glazed with non-transparent glass Final review and approval shall be sublect to City Planner revew and approval. 7) No amplified sound system shall be installed and/or utilized in the courtyard area between the existing the existing Parish Hall and new Pastoral Center 8) Stone veneers on the buildings, walls, pilasters, etc., shall be installed in a manner that does not give the appearance of a tack-on element. Ail stone veneers shall be applied and/or extended so that the material terminates at an appropriate point on the structure Plans submitted for plan check shall provide clear details for the application of stone veneers on the buildings (3-c~ l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES . Apnl 12, 2006 Page 4 9) Prior to the issuance of a Bwlding Permit, the applicant or church shall submit a Tree Removal Permit for trees within the area of work. 10) The applicanUdeveloper shall install all trees in accordance with the approved Landscape Plan for the protect Engineenng Deaartment 1) The existing dnve approaches on Beryl Street are not ADA compliant. A 4-foot width of sidewalk needs to cross each dnve approach at a 0-inch curb face If the existing retaining walls that encroach into the public nght-of-way cannot be relocated, then access ramps shall be provided Sidewalks adtacent to curbs are typically 6 feet wide, m order to provide a 4-foot clearance around the streetlights, poles, and other similar items 2) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the protect side of Beryl Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of Banyan Street to the first pole off-site south of the south protect boundary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Beryl Street • shall be undergrounded at the same time The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Banyan Street shall be paid to the City pnor to the issuance of Bwlding Permits The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the centerline of Beryl Street to the east protect boundary (scaled distance from the Site Plan is 695 feet). 4) Beryl Street frontage improvements shall be protected in place and/or constructed per City Standards along the protect frontage including, but not limited to, a) The sidewalk shall cross the existing drive approaches at the 0-inch curb face, provide ADA compliant sidewalk through the drive approaches The sidewalk shall be ADA compliant around streetlights, poles, and other similar items as well. • b) Provide street trees as required. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV str(e~et lights as requred. IJ'~OZ- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 . Page 5 d) Provide R26 "NO PARKING" signs and striping as regwred. e) Protect all existing street improvements or replace/repair as regwred f) Provide curbside drain outlets at two locations; i On Beryl Street at the southwest corner of the property. u. On Beryl Street dust north of the existing north driveway. 5) Banyan Street frontage improvements shall be protected in place and/or constructed per City Standards along the protect frontage including but not limited to, a) Provide ADA compliant sidewalk through the drive approach. b) Provide street trees as regwred. c) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights as regwred. d) Protect all existing street improvements or replace/repair as . regwred. e) Protect R26 "NO PARKING" signs and striping as required 6) Paint red curbs on Beryl Street / Banyan Street intersection returns to the satisfaction and approval of the City Traffic Engineer 7) Revise Public Improvement Plans to show new public improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to issuance of a Budding Permd 8) Prior to the issuance of Budding Permits, Fonn CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the fast Building Permit Application is submitted to the Building and Safety Department. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • P~-(~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • April 12, 2006 Page 6 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shalt meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering . Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 . 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. i3 - c~ ~l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 7 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biological Resources 1) Prior to issuance of bwiding and grading permits, provide a tree survey/report of trees within the protect area The survey shall provide a site plan designating all trees in the protect area to be removed, relocated, and retained/protected If there are heritage trees within the protect area which meet the speafications as contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Tree Ordinance, then a Tree Removal Permit shall be regwred and the removed trees shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis • within the protect area boundaries 2) Prepare or revise landscape plans to indicate all trees retained and/or to be replaced within the protect area Size of replacement trees shall be a minimum 24-inch box or larger Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of . approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, (3 - ~ 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 8 important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines • Prepare a technical resources management report documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (e g plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological morntoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to • the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activties • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e ,San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) dailyto reduce PM,oemissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the • time of year of construction (~ - (o b PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 9 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Pian, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting (March 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of iwo years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits -7 - Lo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • April 12, 2006 Page 10 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will beused on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Offical for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between the . hours of 8:00 p m and 6 30 a.m ,including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Bwlding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) Haul truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings ~ ~_~e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06- 26 DRC2005-00810 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 11 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS • NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. ~-~~ ~ • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Design Review DRC2005-00810 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 1. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect fde with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2005-00810 April 12, 2006 Page 2 2. Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner. 3 The prolect planner or responsible City department wtll approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development 4 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring wtlt be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 5 Unanticipated circumstances may arse regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 6 The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also • has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post arty necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 8 In those instances requmng long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits ~~~ 1 i MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Design Review DRC2005-00810 Applicant: Charles Joseoh Associates for St. Peter 8~ St Paul Catholic Church Date: March 8. 2006 Initial Study Prepared by: Michael Diaz U' .. ... •. ~ •. rk ..... ~,r ~,ra ~'R ^~t,+.], .~'-y,~ ~a y.: o ~''~~"~a-.x~a .} , ?t. P,Ir Q ` k l t ' ~w .,t».;..ti~ .; ~ 3~ : ~ ~i`,c;%iv"dtna~n <~ ~ I % ` A °L iS+«. ",'~x~~.R', .°y8 r, . ~ K :-*:IS~n'F ~.u x~, -` ..'a'Ti ,. r!Y`A~ 4 n•3,.'.} ~4 '`r 1~'~*.,T r~ ;#` ,9~i . ~ - g 1~.,, ' t: ~ ~ , y : ~ t h ua i ~. .. "tv• k` r 1 - _ .1~ ' ."rr r v .i.a F . -h ~ ;d.i '.ii ~ ~ t •1 `hr ~}., r All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 214 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for Cdy venficatwn Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC 2~4 performance standards noted m SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2~4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2f4 1 of 8 . . .. . . . . ... . . • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 areas to erosion over extended periods of bme • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established 60 C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried aver to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction ~ swtable means II residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercal structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2l4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive far 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions L s ~r$ • ~ .. .. -. . ~. .. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use I~ j ~ f fi J ? ;" .~. iC8l.Resour'ces ' ~,s. Biolo '~" ~ : ~ { ~~ z.e~,.~ 'Y ~ ~4 ~ '~'x~;t.-' ,S• , ~ ~ .~, '~'.r;-~ :ti. r;~'Jr-'s~.a ` ~w.~f'.' ~,~siW ' x ~'F~t .. ~ 1 •p .. r g -. x 4 ~~'• ,.3 +~ Z-r j 1 ~ l~ • ± ~ a ~~•2.~'~~ ~{ i ~ . _ 4 . ' a's\ .~ Y~L"i -.I 1 Prior to issuance of bwlding and grading permits, CP B Review of Plans C 2l4 provide a tree surveylreport of trees within the protect area The survey shall provide a site plan designating all trees in the protect area to be removed, relocated, and retained/protected If there are heritage trees within the protect area which meet the speafications as contained in the Rancho Cucamonga Tree Ordinance, then a Tree Removal Permit shall be regwred and the removed trees shall be replaced on a 1 to 1 basis within the protect area boundaries Prepare or revise landscape plans to indicate all trees CP B Review of Plans C 2l4 retained and/or to be replaced within the protect area ize of replacement trees shall be a minimum 24-inch box or larger •r,. }: c ~..,• M Ss" - :.. i ' i '-,> '"~'r ;r~; ~~ ,°i' „ , lt al;Re o i , i• , c ~~ • ~.~'=:.= ~ :' "d'a-".:-~ ~~,~,,. . t _r~, ' 2. -~ : ~ ->; Y "~ _ %t. 'S ~ ' s~. . ti rces ur s t u = - - f any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites CPIBO C Review of report aC 3l4 from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation CPIBO C Review of report a0 3l4 of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point 3of8 .. ~ ... ,~ ,~ • ~. . the public about the area's Pursue educating CPIBO C Revew of report Ali 3l4 archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend CPIBO C Review of report Ali 314 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report Ali 3l4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report '°`~~ 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be , appropriate W here mtigation mondonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures 4 Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and • CP B Review of report Ali egmpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO BIC p Review of re ort Ali 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find U +~° • • i ~ .. .. .. -. , -. .. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Revew of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum s; .... ~. .iY.'. - . ~'''- •. <~ t'~~C7 ?. ~,_%~ r ', Sods;~.:s. ~G l gy d ;:'*~`, ~t31'~~tY '#~' s ~.-, sv. ^.,U. Jz..". ,, y •,~:. - ;t- _r-- = ni ~.X y ~ r. , ~.]'F3~ ~ ~~_' ,~ ~°', .:~ ~_ .. .``,- _ , te _ . ~ eo o ,an , 5;. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction ~ from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions Quali t ate { B d ' ' =~ ~ • : - =~ . ~ :>~ ° _ nd,W, r , ..,., ,.,., rology }Hy ~ y,...,.;.;:;; :c . ;s . _; -_,~° , r.~_ - s - - - , Pnor toissuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to the Bwlding Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical L 5 of 8 ~ .. ... -. . ~. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2l4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activdies are indicted through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame Durng construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/CID Review of plans AIC 2l4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (September 12, 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2l4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits L • ~8 .. .. ~. ~. .. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 submd to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The W QMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State W ater Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City t Bwlding Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit h +{ViAM N, X4l V 'a r"'i 4hi1 _.~ 9 ~ ~}~~ ~1 ~i yi ..t`ix '~~ /e t~.'~A~ ~.8 M tC ,1Noise.~' s 3~m.m+~s~~~ '~,~.~:.;"'~i,~v~;~a'"s'a. ~s ~~f'L^_.~i-~C ~4F~ '4 ~'.. ~".ar- ._F~•' ~.+ X14 T F:.~' b! v,/iif~b i~~F~ +t ,„ r• - v~. +Y CS .. T~.~~. _Y i5R • A~ 9 e'.._;s- v,, i .. - PZ'?e r,+~~„vc P. ~"' .,,.-~ iY j~.+,!. ^~i1 < -V .{°~, w ~y~~ i~01 ~ .~.hN -e,• t Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 7 of 8 ~ .. ... ~. . ~. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Durng A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POIBO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a ational holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings L Key to Checklist Abbreviations '4YnY 6pRP Ra -rY" - ~_ itesponsiq~,~rs~i) *k ', ~ ~ CDD -Community Development Director or designee tv F ^~~• P 'M 9v Tom' ~„MOnifori~g:Fregueiicya ` ~ ° A -With Each New Development •y• 3 n F ~Method~of~,VerificatioriK~ ,,,, T° A - On-site Inspection 'r" t-' .k f,a , ~ 'rl Sanctions~~ ;~ ~:, ~ t ,; ~ ~, ~,; ;' ~~'~~ 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Slop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operabng 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation ~° COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00810 SUBJECT: PASTORAL CENTER AT ST. PETER AND ST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR ST PETER AND ST PAUL LOCATION: 9135 BANYAN STREET - APN: 1062-381-01 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ompletion Date ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to reimgwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-26, Standard J_/_ and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The Conditions , sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect Time Limits B . 1 This DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or _/~- se has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are d u approve allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and site plans , grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations • 2 Prior to any use of the Pastoral Center being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval Planner f the Cit t f _/~_ y ion o ac shall be completed to the satis SC-1-OS 1 ~~' ~j~ Project No DRC2005-00810 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Bulding and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 Ail site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc ) 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans m effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All new parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees requved to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 OS 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 For non-residential development, property owners are responsible forthe continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thnwng condition, and shall receroe regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and tnmmmg Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage SC-1-05 -~-~- -/~- _/~_ -~~- _/~- _/~_ _/-J~ ~-~- / / _/~. • Protect No DRC2005-00810 Completion Date G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Slgn Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental 1- Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner In the amount of $495 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds forforteit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) SEE ATTACHED. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedication and Vehicular Access . 1 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City J. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and ail other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Curb & AC. Side- Drive Street SVeet Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Troll Island Troll Other Beryl Street X X Banyan Street X X Improvement Plans and Construction SC-1-05 Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfactioQn of the City Engineer and the Cit} 3 ~- (! _/_/- ~~. _/_J_ ~~- _/~- ~~- Protect No DRC2005-00810 Comolehon Date Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a ~_J~ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and ~~_ interconnect condut shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction ~~_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and pawng, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential tots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check ~_/_ 4 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required K. Public Maintenance Areas , A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ~_/_ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer L. Utilities ,. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary .~~_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the ~~_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects (~ - 8 3 . 5~-,-05 4 Project No DRC2005-00810 Completion Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them M. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, pnorto final map approval or priorto budding permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of bwiding permits, a Diversion Deposd and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first budding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldmgs, wdh direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting m exterior areas shall be mvandal-resistant fixtures O. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wthin 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used P. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility O. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and m turn save dollars and lives 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: / / ~~- ~J- ~-/- ~_~- ~~_ ~___/_ ~~. -J-/_ ~~- SEE ATTACHED (~ ~/ SC-,-05 a " ~ 1 Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Building & Safety COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS January 9, 2006 St Peter & St Paul Church 9135 Banyan DRC2005-00810 NOTE: Any rev~srons may votd these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction 2 The project shall be designed to comply with the 2001 Califorrna Building Codes (CBC), the Califorrna Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 ~ 39 . 3 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code for regwred occupancy separations 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the regwred fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7 Provide the required restroom faalities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc ). 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be required 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled. 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans B. General Requirements • 1 Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan ~,~5 Page 1 of 3 b Floor Plan c Foundation Plan d Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning g. Plamm~g Division Tracking Number (i a ,DRC, SUBTT, SUBTPM etc.) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnor to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Budding and Safety Division C. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e., DRC, SUBTT, SUBTPM etc.) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to' City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance. 3 The Budding and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Plamm~g Division's public counter) D. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Budding Code, • City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with(t~he approved Grading Plan (1 -~~ Page 2 of 3 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of • Califorrna to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4. At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be regwred. 5 The final Grading Plan, appropnate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of building permits 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved pnor to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710. I' L_ ~g7 Page 3 of 3 ...v~ , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • - District -- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS January 9, 2006 St. Peter & St. Paul Church 9135 Banyan DRC2005-00810 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. All condition of the approved Alternate Method must be met. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants• a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fue hydrants are• At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections. ni On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A mirnmum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the (~-8S facility or budding, additional prroate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction • thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed wdl be determined when the construction type of the budding is known 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to prowde the required fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to prowde required fire flow. 3 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed m 1. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the Califorrna Fire Code 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the budding or swte's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. ~8~ 2 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system • FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 ~. Location of Access. All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches • f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20- feet on each side. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. ~ Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3 Access Doorways. Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows• a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each • 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the requred access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. PJ_c~ ~ 3 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department • access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply. a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical • malfunction h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate m a visible and unobstructed location. i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi- directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the vanous entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted • to B&S for plan review ~'~>I 4 8 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the budding size and configuration d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is regwred. ~,f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check i Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems . . Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids ~ _C~ Z 5 • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures i • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Budding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Seances staff and the Fire Marshal has review the request for an alternate method, as submitted. The request has been approved. Please refer to the document for the special conditions of approval. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits ~-~t3 ~~ 6 Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fue District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". ~ -9 y PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the ~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On prroate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power). 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during period ~ f ~r~ess When the bwlding setback t~ exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industnal bwldings. The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes _ 1o Hazardous Materials. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the ~ ~ applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. -- 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete ~~ the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subiect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12 Mapping Site Plan• Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x - _ 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicarit to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. ~- ~3-qc~ 9 Staff Report DATE April 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY. Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01000 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection that will be located less than the standard 1,320-foot intersection spaang regwrement. Related Files• Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01007, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01008, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Counal for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Counal will be separately noticed. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial on 8 21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Counal for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Counal will be separately noticed ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development District Designation from Office to Community Commercal on 8.21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN. 0227-152-18 and 31 Related Files. Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, ITEMS C, D, E, F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 February 12, 2003 Page 2 General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Community Commercial District land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels and mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within mator hotel faalities as a Conditionally Permitted Use. Related Files• Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action wtll be forwarded to the City Counal for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed. SUMMARY The Planning staff has been working with the applicant, Charles Joseph Assoaates, on an application (Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365) that proposes a master plan consisting of an office and commercial center comprised of a 4-story, 112-room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, a 2-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet, and a gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission only review the legislative items at this time, review and action on the Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Master Plan, Parcel Map, and Variance for the protect site will follow at a later date The CUP has been deemed incomplete PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION' A Surroundino Land Use and Zornng• North - Single-Family homes, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) South - Vacant Land and Aggazzotti Home and former Winery Site, Industrial Park East - Open Space and Edison Transmission Towers; Open Space West - Spaghetti Factory Restaurant, Home Depot, and Retail Uses; Commurnty Commercial B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Office North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - General Commercial East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor West - Communty Commercial C. Site Characteristics. The protect site is located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The site is rectangular in shape and is comprised of two parcels The protect site is vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the matority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes No buildings occupy the protect site To the north is asingle-family neighborhood and to the west, across Rochester Avenue, are the Spaghetti Factory, Home Depot, and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, are vacant land and the Aggazzotti home, formerly a winery, and designated Historic Point of Interest To the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor ~, ~,E~ Fa PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 . February 12, 2003 Page 3 ANALYSIS. A General Plan Amendment for Medan Break The applicant is requesting to amend Table III-12 of the General Plan Circulation Element in order to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection The median break and signalized intersection will be spaced less than the standard 1/4 mile intersection spacing as identified in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. In order to support the request for a median break, the applicant has aligned the signal with entry points for two commercial projects one located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (DRC2005-00365) and the other located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (DRC2005-01084) The applicant has also conducted a detailed traffic analysis of the proposed signalized median break General Plan Transportation Policies The Circulation Element of the General Plan limits intersection spacing to a minimum of 1/4 mile apart in order to improve the traffic flow Table III-12 calls for 1/4 mile spacing of intersections along Mayor Divided Arterials. Every intersection, whether signalized or 4-way stop, reduces the traffic flow The proposed amendment would insert new language allowing the City Engineer to consider less than 1/4 mile spacing subject to detailed traffic studies At the intersection, the most common measure of traffic flow is Level of Service. Further, General Plan Goal 3.5.1 states the following "We shall maintain a . Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections within our City at peak hours " General Plan Discussion• The Level of Service (LOS) concept is a qualitative measure describing operating conditions at an intersection or along a roadway segment. It describes operating conditions in terms of factors such as speed, freedom to maneuver, traffic delay, comfort and convenience, and safety The LOS system works like a report card A is the best, an almost empty road, B is slightly more congested, C has more congestion than B, and D is perhaps the level of service of a busy shopping corridor in the middle of a weekday -cars can move around, but not very well and not very gwckly, vehicles are hemmed in by other cars and trucks. An F is a traffic lain See attached table (Exhibit J) Level of Service D or better is the City's adopted standard for all but seven intersections within the General Plan Study Area at build-out This standard serves as a foundation for providing a street network that moves people and goods safely and efficiently throughout the community, while ensuring that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. Seven intersections are forecast to operate at a LOS-E, upon implementation of the maximum feasible intersection improvements identified in the General Plan Traffic Study and assuming implementation of the 6th Street interchange An operating standard of Level of Service E or better is consistent with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for San Bernardino County on CMP designated intersections Analvsis~ Willdan Consultants prepared a traffic signal warrant study and analyzed the LOS for the existing Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard intersection, the intersection at Masi Drive and Foothill Boulevard and for the proposed intersection at the easterly boundary of the project. The traffic signal warrant study states that under post-project conditions without the median break, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue declines to an unacceptable . LOS-F during both the a m and p m peak hours Under post project conditions with the median break, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue would operate acceptably during the a m peak hour (LOS-C) but would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS-F during the p m peak hour The delay, however, would improve significantly from 237 7 seconds e,D,~,~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 February 12, 2003 Page 4 to 95 2 seconds This improvement will provide a westbound left turn movement at the proposed signal location to relieve the westbound left turning volumes at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue With the ultimate improvements of a dual westbound at eastbound turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue would improve from aLOS-C to B in the a m peak hour and from aLOS-F to a LOS-D during the p m peak hour The study also states that the LOS at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive would still operate at an acceptable level of service and not be negatively or positively affected by the proposed median break and signal at the eastern boundary of the project Also, the median break would not only relieve the westbound left turn movement on Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue, but also the northbound left turn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard With a median break and full improvements to Foothill Boulevard (dual east and west turning movements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue), the intersection where the proposed signal is located would operate at a LOS-B durng the a m and p m peak hours The study also states that the median break will also provide relief for the northbound left turn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard by mitigating stacking The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed and concurs with the proposed traffic signal warrant analysis prepared by Wildan and supports the proposed median break location B Development Code Amendment The proposed prp~ect is located in the Office Distract (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Districts The existing land use designation and zoning is • Office, which is pnmanly intended for office, administrative and personal uses and does permit most retail uses In order to allow retail uses, the applicant has also filed for a General Plan Amendment and Development Distract Amendment to change the Land Use Designation and Development District Designation from Office to Community Commercial Although a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment will allow for commercial use of the 8 2-acre site (Exhibit E), the Community Commercial Distract Land Use Regulations do not presently list hotels, motels, mayor hotel facilities, and cocktail facilities within mayor hotel facilities as permitted by right or as a Conditionally Permitted Use (CUP) Presently, the only Development Distract within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts that allows hotels, motels, mayor hotel facilities, and cocktail facilities within mayor hotel facilities is the Regionally Related Commeraal Distract (Exhibits E and F) Cocktail lounges and bars that are not part of a mator hotel faality regwre a Conditional Use Permit in both the Regional Related and Community Commercial Distract Designations On January 18, 2006, the City Counal unanimously voted to initiate the Development Code Amendment proposed by Charles Joseph Associates The amendment would specifically allow hotels, motels and mayor hotel faalities and cocktail lounges within mator hotel faalities subject to review and approval of a CUP The amendment would affect the Use Regulations of Chapter 17 32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts) Specifically, the Use Regulation Table for Foothill Boulevard Distracts would be modified to add hotels, motels, mator hotel facilities and cocktail facilities within mayor hotel facilities as a CUP within the Community Commeraal District (Subarea 4) of Foothill Boulevard Distracts (Exhibit B) Subarea 4 presently has four Development Distracts that are designated as Community Commeraal (Exhibit E) Therefore, a Development Code Amendment to allow hotels, motels, mayor hotel faalities, and cocktail lounges within mayor hotel faalities subtect to revew and approval of a CUP would create the opportunity for other hotel . projects within the four existing Community Commeraal Designations to be submitted and considered The proposed project site and one other existing Community Commeraal Distract is PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 . February 12, 2003 Page 5 ad)acent to an existing single-family dwelling neighborhood, and two other exlsting Community Commercial Districts are ad)acent to exlsting multi-famlly dwelling units C General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment for Land Use Change Appropriateness of Proposed Land Use The site is currently designated as an Office District, which is complementary with exlsting land uses along Foothill Boulevard Section 17.32 020-C-1 defines the Office District in the following manner The Office District "is intended to accommodate professional/administrative office and personal services as opposed to commercial orientated land uses. Typically, uses consist of executive, management, administrative, or clerical uses including the establishment of branch offices, data processing centers, and the provision of consultation establishments of a professional nature " Currently, the nearest other designated Office Districts within the Foothill Boulevard Districts are at the northeast and southeast corners of San Bernardino Road and Grove Avenue and at the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (approximately 4 5 miles to the west) and on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Vineyard Avenue and Hellman Avenue (approximately 3 5 miles to the east) The applicant is requesting Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for their proposal to amend the current land use designations of the 8 2-acre pro)ect site The requested changes would amend the existing Office Land Use Designation In the General Plan and the Development District Designation to Community Commercial (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts The following table Is a summary description of the current land use designations and uses and a breakdown of the other elements of the pro)ect Current Land Use Designations & Develoament Existing APN Lot Area Existing General Plan Desi nation Existing Zoning Desi nation Existing Use 0227-152-18 5 45 acres Office Office (Subarea 4) Vacant Land Foothill Boulevard Distncts 0227-15231 2 75 acres Office Office (Subarea 4) Vacant Land Foothill Boulevard Districts PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2 0 0 5-0 1 000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 February 12, 2003 Page 6 Proposed Chancres to General Plan Land Use Desicrnation and Development District Designation To permit the proposed protect consisting of a hotel, office, retail, bank and service station with convenience store, the current land use designations and development district designations must be amended to a land use designation that allows for hotel and retail development Concurrent with the General Plan and Development District legislative entitlements, the applicant has submitted a parcel map to create six parcels (Exhibit H) The proposed new land use designation for the protect site is summarized in the following table APN's Area Proposed General Plan Desi nation Proposed Zoning Designation Proposed Future Uses Parcel Map Entire 8 2-Acre Community Commercial Community Commercial BanWOffice, SUBTPM77594 Protect Site (Subarea 4) Service Station with Food Court, Office Foothill Boulevard and Retail, 2 Districts Restaurants and a Hotel General Plan Land Use and Development Policies General Plan Goal 2 6 1.1 1 states the following "Land uses should be sought which serve our local needs and, to the extent possible, respond to regional market interests as well " General Plan Discussion. Our community is well located with respect to the regional transportation system The economic health of our City depends in part on revenues brought into the City by purchasers who live or conduct business elsewhere Because of the recognized quality of development within Rancho Cucamonga, we believe we can serve regional needs as well as those of our own community In addition, we can provide employment for workers who live in our City Foothill Boulevard has always been the City's primary commercial corridor as evidenced by the numerous shopping centers Analvsis The proposed Land use amendment will allow for the site to be developed with a master planned commercial pro)ect as discussed in the summary section above. Given the present land use composition immediately east of the protect site consisting of a large concentration of retail power centers and Victoria Gardens, the proposed land use change will provide an opportunity for land uses that will provide for uses, such as hotels, that will provide support services for the nearby regional destination points, such as Victoria Gardens Further, the proposed land use change will allow a commercial district to provide a greater diversity of land uses that will provide opportunities for both office and commercial uses, thereby providing a transitional zone between the Regionally-Related Commercial Districts located east of the protect site on the north and south side of Foothill Boulevard General Ptan Land Use and Development Policies General Plan Goal 2 6 1 3 4 states the following "A variety of commercial centers should be established to serve a broad range of retail and service needs for the community." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 February 12, 2003 Page 7 General Plan Discussion Multiple needs for commercial goods and services exist in our community. We seek a range of neighborhood, community and regional uses at convenient locations throughout our City The locations of various types of centers are expected to provide reasonable competition and choice of merchandise for our citizens and visitors alike Analysis The proposed land use changes are associated with a proposed master-planned protect that will consist of office, retail, hotel and restaurant uses. Although the proposed protect is not a true mixed use protect, it incorporates a variety of land uses that will provide fobs, services, and lodging for business and personal uses in close proximity to the regional mall. General Plan Land Use and Development Policies General Plan Goal 2 6 1 5 8 states the following: "Development design shall incorporate methods of limiting nwsance impacts on adtacent development, including tudicious use of bwlding and access orientation and other buffering devices " General Plan Discussion A great deal can be done through creative design to avoid conflicts between dissimilar uses This includes such techrnques as building orientation, window limitations, noise management procedures, setbacks, landscape or wall buffers, and many other techniques we would like to see put in practice here Analysis The proposed protect that is associated with the proposed land use changes • incorporates many site planning features that will prevent the separation of potential nuisance activities and ensure the compatibility of adtacent uses The assocated protect that is in the City's Development Review process has been designed with an 8-foot high wall in order to provide adequate privacy and sound attenuation for the residential uses north of the protect The protect has been designed so office uses are plotted closest to the residential uses, thereby providing an additional buffer with a use that has hours of operation that will not negatively impact the single-family dwelling units north of the protect site. The 4-story hotel bwiding has been oriented on a north to south axis so that none of the guest rooms face the single-family dwellings to the north All bwldings that are closest to the residential neighborhood have extra deep setbacks in order to provide the maximum amount of buffering Overall Analysis Summary Based upon the analysis above, staff finds the proposed changes in the land use designations to be appropriate The proposed land use changes will be an effective means for implementing the goals and obtectives of the General Plan by providing for orderly development of the site that will support and provide uses that are compatible with the nearby regional-related commercial developments The associated protect has utilized appropriate site planning and buffering techniques that will result in the protect being compatible and sensitive to the existing single-family dwelling units to the north D Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant has gone door-to-door in the neighborhood to speak with residents who directly abut their protect It is staff's understanding that the applicant was able to speak with most, if not ail, of the adtoining residents In addition, on January 3, 2006, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the proposed protect at the Best Western Hotel at 8179 Spruce Avenue Approximately 15 residents from the residential neighborhood to the north . attended the meeting The residents had questions about the type of uses that would occupy the buildings, privacy issues between the rear yards and the proposed protect, and whether or not the protect would have drive-thrus The applicant explained in detail the size and scope of the protect C, 1~1 ~~ F J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 February 12, 2003 • Page 8 and indicated that the height of the hotel would be mitigated by the 100-foot plus setback The applicant also noted that the hotel has been plotted on a north to south axis so that none of the rooms will have a direct view into the rear yards or homes located directly to the north The applicant also explained that an 8-foot high wall with an adtacent 15-foot wide landscape planter would be constructed along the north property line The applicant's ciwl engineer explained that the neighborhood to the north is at a higher elevation than the proposed protect, and that the lower elevation of the protect would provide further protection from glare generated from the light poles The residents indicated general support of the proposed protect, however, they expressed overall concern of the additional traffic the development would bring and the potential for drivers to try to find ashort-cut through their neighborhood The residents requested to have speed bumps installed on Chervil Street as a precautionary measure in order to reduce the possibility of speed violations It was explained that there is no access connection into their neighborhood from the proposed protect The applicant indicated that the residents should contact the City's Traffic Engineering Department regarding the installation of traffic calming devices. E Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study Planning staff completed Part II of the Initial Study The planning staff concluded that the protect could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality dunng site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce impacts to short-term air quality The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a • less-than-sigrnficant level Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the protect CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 600-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolutions recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, and General Plan Amendment DC DG/ge • Dan Coleman Acting City Planner PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2005-01000/GPA DRC2005-01006/DDA DRC2005-01002/DCA DRC2005-01003 February 12, 2003 Page 9 " Attachments Exhibit A -Existing General Plan Land Use and Development District Designations Exhibit B -Proposed General Plan Land Use and Development District Designations Exhibd C -Site Utilization Map Exhibit D -Site Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365 Exhibit E -Land Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Exhibit F -Foothill Boulevard Development District Map for Subarea 4 Exhibit G -Letter of request from applicant Exhibit H -Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 Exhibit I -Levels of Service Definitions Exhibit J -Median Break Exhibit for Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet of Rochester Avenue Exhibit K -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000 Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Distnct Amendment DRC2005-01002 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Development District Amendment RC2005-01002 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 • Draft Ordinance of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 C, D, G , F 9 <S v/ v uO;IDJ 4117tlDJl ~lJ W6J _n~aa aD S•.II __ _ n e y __ _y r ~ 6 4 ter ~ _ " o y ~ S L' ~ e _ ~ lb l3 at3 s _ .- 4 ./ e n ~ ~ o .~ 3y- - I _ C\ , 0 y >3Jdu 7rau>w, ~__ / ~ } - s ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I y ~ } ' ~ -- - - I _T_ - i _ _ _ 3n1f3ntl _aJ~NJC1t1 __ __ 1 -: +~ ~ I I^ ~_ _ • 1~ I~ + + + + ~ + ~ (~ ~, u // i !~ / / / ~ ,, ~~ ;~ - ~ ~~ a -.~-:- ~~e II ~ F I 9 r I I I ___ ____ -__ _ ____ __ _ ___ _ - ____ qlJ I gg ~ T 11lnJS i a I 1 7 i I - I - I - ~I _ ~I ' ~1 °i of ~~ ICI ~ _° I 4 ~ ~ `'' _ I i. ~\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + I I I --- -- ----- - j - ------ -- __-____ I ---___ f I ~_ 9 ~ ~ ~ I° ` e y _ I ~ ~^ _ ~ I 1 -. e j 1 9 I ~ • I ~ i _ ___ I- J i I ~ ~ I I I ' I I ' I\'' I ___ ry I + ~ ;- ~6 ~~ -- _ ~, e ~ E IF _ ~--- ~= ~ ~ ~ I f~_' r-- 3NED IS.n ~ ' ~~ -_ $~~ $~ y~ S }6 e a- a= 2! s d 6F s @6 z :' P I P ~9 • ' --- ;, _ . lY~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ @ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ o y ~ 5 ~, a ~ Regional Related , ~' ~ i --- Commercial ~ ~ -- - - - _ _ __-__ _- _ ___ I ~: ~_-__-_ _ _--_ ._ .: z _ ~ Open Space ~ ~ .o_~c- :~ -, ,r „-,~, ~ !Open;Space g`' Z ~ Wy ~: S i „ 9 a _ I ._-__ i- ~ kt E _- __ ~ - ~ Y I ~-- --N '- - ~~ -~ a i a - . j~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ ~ J ~ `_ ~ ~ U~ ~l f I ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ { ~ ~ i ~ 4 i ` __ _.. _" - , __ __ -_ ~ •'j ~ -- - _- ~ i / . - ~ - ~ - I - i V r - ~ ~ - ~ i~ ~y------ ff : ~ ~, v ~ - ~ - ~_ ~ `~ ~' ~ ._ ---- -- - a i ~ ~ ~-- ~---- ~ ~ ~ ,fl U U ~ ~ ' --- --- V II __~ ~ .-~ - I L ~ , - ~I'!'' E'~I~ .I it . ~ i ------- - .I.11 8 ~; ' ~ - -- sill I y ; ` --- - P~il-;l, ' ~ ~ " 6a. 4\QJ, _ °, I I 1 I I 1 1 _ ' I _ `= I ~~ % y I r. o ~ ~ ` 4 i ~ o • >~ 1 ~ I I ~ ~ o o I q I ~ ti q I ~ I o i q N05103 YINtlOaIIYJ Ntl3H1n05 1 ,{ i o ~ ~ "' I i i 3aaa aos.w e - 4 I A 4 M " 9 4 4 a 4 I 1 g 4 ~ 4 4 y ~ ~. s a e 4 0 4 _ e ~ j Q. ~~~: g 4 ° ~ o I 1_ y _ 9 Oa 13NN3 w °m 1 1 , ~ 4 c 9 9 § _ e o d~ ~ ~ ~ ' p 1 ' ~ g ~9 9 8 9 W 8 w ~ I . o- ' 4 e~ .e/ ~ c ~ 4 N II 4 i - 9 Q § 9 4_ '~•~ 9 S ~ r e a a 4 I I i I 4 9 4 e 4 9 9 - I o ~s ti q L __. ____t33a15~tiYflN31±- ~ I I fl e 4 e a 9 a P } a a 9 9 4 9 9 _ _ 4 ~ I - --------T- -- ----- -~- 3nN3ntl tl3153N70a ~ ~ ~9 t Y j 1 6 N N p m s~ W y 5 ~ N 0 S ni s yx B 6~ w z c= ~q' Y ~4 ~ '~ ~~ LL ~ O i 1 I a CI If 84 • ~ @ ~ 4 9 4 4 I •• I~ ~ ~ ~ I __ ~ I • 1 ~ I ~ I 9 ;~ o I w 9 I q~ ~ ~ 9 I > I 1 s~~. 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 - 4 4 - ~ f ~ I ~ I ~ I s ~ ~ 4 ~ I - 's ~ I 4 / ~ -~ I 4 s ~ - ~z- ~(~SF~sT d - i~ ~e I 4 ~ ~~~~~ ^ c , o ~ V ~ ~ ~ (.. j ~ 3Naa Isurv ~®~" i • u .~_.___ 1 ar,ae3owlT,uooi --_ , m.fi,-aw wv a _ _v ,avaournnec«.ao~.'P+ _~?~~ ~ 1~1 l l i l a I Y ~ I a @~ _ _ ~~~ d ' a° t ~ I ~ r 4 I C o ) ^ i V C ~ E I I Es E ~ t r ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 i _ _ " , I i " I s o - I ; ~ _ t ~ I m O i ~ { , , y i I o • I 6 II o 0 ~_ 0 ° ~ 0 ° ' ~ r I I ~I I V ~ I / bpi o ~ o o t t , ~ I i o o ~ \~ M I 0 0 ,\ ~ I i r• ~ o ~ I J J ~ o ~ y y , © I I I ° t I I I ~ ; o ai V t t S~ i i I I ,, 6e ~~. dd . ° d ^G ' ~ c 0 ' , d I V o , ~ , I I, , , I o0 0 ot o . C i o f i ~ 1 R , -I ^+ 1 / _ _ i I { ~, a ~ ~ ~ P r _ r-, -~ 0 0 c~: ~ ° ,~ I ~. e , ~ ~ iii , - - ~ ~ - ,~ ~ , o \I - t ~ - r~ , , ~ t O ~~ ' I I{ -- I , N ~ - ~ I I ~ o a ip ~ ~ ^ , . i V z o 7 0'6~ ~ y /I _ i o I® ~ _ e :~ / 1 _ r 9 ^ ;. I - r I I ~,~ ~iT~ i I I ~ A I' _ e - ~- ---- - - -- _ --L- - - ~ -- -- - ,_I _ _ ~, Rancho Cucamon a Develo ment Code Section 17 32 030 u • Table 17.32.030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Thre e Subarea Four ' MUa O MR P SC CC O MR MMR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU ~ RRC MR LI O Anti ue Sho s P P P P P P P P A argil ues uti B P P P P P p p p q o a) P P P P P P P b Generel P P P P P A Rance Stores end Re atr Art, Musk:, Photographic Studios end p p p p p p P P P' C Su I Stores C C C C C C C C C Auto Sernce Statbn Auto Service pncludmg tre0ers, motorcycles, boats, campers) a) Sales (wtth ancillary repair p p P P C facildles) l P p P P b) Renta s c) Minor Repair (does rrot Include mayor engine work, muffler C C C shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc) C C C d) Coln-op Washing ts Washm t A C C C O g oma u e) P P P P f Parts and Su Iles P P P P P P P P P P Bekenes retell ont P P P P P P P P P P P P Barber and Bea Sho s C C C C C C C C C Bed end Breakfast P P P P P P BI cle Sho s Blue rent and Photoco Services P P P P P P P P P P Book, GrN and Stationery Stores p p p p p p p p P P P C other then adult related metenel P Ceti and Confectionenes P P P P P P P P P F F Caterin Establishments P P P P P P P China end Glassware Stores P P P Chnstmes Tree/PUmpkin Sales Lots p p P o eretin on a tam re Desis C C C C C C C C C C C C C Churches C C C Cleaning and Pressing p p p p p P P P P P P C Establishments Cocktetl Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) C C C C C C C C C C C mcludin related entertainment Commercial Recreational a) Indoor uses such as bowling and p p p p p p p P P P billiards b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and C C C C C C C C C basketball Convalescent Facilities & Hos dais P P P P P P P P P P P P P Curtain end Dra Sho s P P P P P C C C C C P C C Dav Care Centers C C C C C C C 1 Refer to Subarea 4 Section 77 32 080 F 7 b )footrace 2) 2 All intlustnal uses and tlevelopment standards snail be as provided in Subarea 7.01 Chapter 17 30 3 SuDlect ro Master Plan regrarements pursuant to 17 32 030 D a CommeruaUOfhce uses maybe locatetl m the RRC district only warn the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project This provision is intentled to facilitate the tlevelopment of large, regionally related uses Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than ttase businesses which draw custaners pnmanly from the neighDOrhootl or cemmunay level 5 Public Storage may be lixated in Me RRC distncl only within an enclosed building No outtloor storage is penndtetl The public storage use may oaupy a pomon of an eusang retail braiding Drovidetl the braltling is at least 50,000 square feet, the public storage use does not occupy the first 100 foot depth of storefront leasable area, antl the public storage use does not Occupy more than 50 percent of the ground floor of the building ~7~~'~ K3-~r E 17 32-11 08/03 Rancho Cucamonxa Develooment Code Section 17 32 030 • MU'I O I MR I P ISCI CC I O IMRIMHR ISCICC ICO ILMRI MRI U IMUI~IRRCI MRI LI~I O Delicatessens and Specialty Food ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ P ~ ~ I I P I P I P ~ ~ ~ p ~ p ~ P' 1 ~,~, ~~ Drug Stores and Pharmacies 000 square feet e) Over 10 P P P P P P , b) Pharmacies vnth or without specialty retaA under 10,000 C C P C P P P s uare feet Electronics Sales and Service (TVs, P p p p p p Stereos, radios, com users EducaDOnal Services C C C C C C C C C C C C a) Parochial, Pnvate, Colleges, UnrversrDes b) Instrucaon, tutonng, counseling, testing, training schools and C C C C C C C C C C C C facihbes c) vocational, Technical, Trade, Business end Professional C C C C C C C C C C C C Schools d Miscellaneous schools C C C C C C C C C C C C Farmers' Markets P P P P P Floor Covenn Sho P P P P P Flonst Sho s P P P P P P P P P P P P Furniture Stores P P P P P P P Hardware Stores P P P P P Health end Athletic Gyms and Weight C C P C P C P P P~ P Reduan Clinics Hobb Sho s P P P P P P ce Cream Stores and Soda Fountains P P P P P P P P P Janrtonal Semces and Su lies P P P P C Jewel Stores P P P P P P P Leund Self Service P P P P Leather Goods and Lu a e Stores P P P P P P P Libraries end Museums, public and C rivate Li uor Stores C C C C C C C Messen er and W ue Services P P P P P P P P Mixed Use Public Store e C C Monuaries and Cemetenes C Music, Dance, and Mertiel ArLS C C P C P P P Studios News rand Ma azine Stores P P P P P P P P P P P Nursenes and Garden Supply Stores P p p p p within enclosed area Office, Business Machine end p p p p p p p p p C Corn afar Com nent Stores Office Su I Stores P P P P P P P P P P Paint, Glass, antl Wall er Stores P P P P P Parkmg Facnmes (commercial where C fees are char ed Parks and Recreation Facilities, public C and ovate P P P P P P P Pet Sho s Photoco Xerox P P P P P P P P Political or Philanthropic Headquarters C 1 Reler to Subarea 6 Section 17 32 080 F 7 b (footnote 2) 2 All industnal uses and development standards shall De as providetl m Subarea 7 0l Chapter 1730 • 3 Suger7t to Masser Plan requirements pursuant to 77 32 030 D a CommeraavOttice uses may De locatetl m tfie RRC dismct only with the concurrent cevelopmem of one mapr regiorialry related anctar business of • at least 75,000 square feet per sde or protect TNS provision is intended to faaktate the developmem of Wrge, regronally related uses Regionally Related Commercial uses are typdietl by large style businesses which serve a market area sgndiwndy larger man Vwse businesses which tlraw aistorners pnmanly from me ceighDOmood ar community level 5 Pudic Storage may De located in the RRC tlistnM only within an enclosed Duildug No outdoor storage is pannltted The public storage use may occupy a portion of en ewsung retatl bwltlmg provitletl the bniltlmg is at least 50,000 square feet the public storage use does not Occupy me first t 00 loot deem of storefront leasable area, end the pubbc storage use tlces not ocapy more man 50 percem of the ground door of me bmldirq -~~Hsg~ ~.-~ e,~, E, ~ , 5 0803 17 32-12 Section 17 32 030 Rancho Cucamon a Develo ment Code Subar RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES ea On e Subarea Two Sub area Three Sub aree Four ' • MU' O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU C RRC MR LI O Publtc and Pnvate Clubs and Lodges, C including YMCA, YWCA, and stmllar Youth Grou Uses P P P p p P P P Record and Ta Stores C Recreational Vehtde Store a Yards Restaurants sd down C C C C a) with entertainment and/or cocktail C C C C C C lounge, bar b) Incidental sernng of beer and P P P P P P P P wnne (wditout a cocktail lounge, P P P P bar, entertainment or dancing) c) caf4, hmded to 20 seats (Including P P P P P P P P P P outdoor seating) P P C C C d) Fflst Food With drive-thru P O P C P P P P Wdhout dove-thru P P P P p p p P P P Shoe Stores and Re tr S P p p P P P S Ial Retell P Soomnc Goods Stores e) Speclatty, Backpacking, Tennis, P p p p P Skiing, Mountaineanng, Fishing, P P P etc b) General, encompassing a vanery P p P P P of s its uI ant P p P P Su ennerkets P P p P P Swlmmin Pool Services end Su lies P P P P P P Tailor Sho P P P p p P P To Stores Vanery Departrnent Stores, Jumor P C O p C P p p De artment Stores C Veterlne domestic C O p p P P a) Noo-boardmg ~ ~ O O C C b Boardln P P p p p P P P Watch and Clock Re Ir Stores F P p p p vardaoe Goods Stores end Art Sales Subarea One P I C Subaree Two ~ Subarea Three C P I P C Subaree Four Theater 1 Refer to Subarea 4 Batson 17 32 080 F 7 b (fonDate 2) 2 All Intlusinal uses and development standards shall be as prowtled m Subarea 7 0l Chapter 1730 3 Subfect ro Master Flan repuuemeMS pursuant to 1732 030 D 4 CommeraaVOttlce uses maY De located m the RRC district only wdh the concurrent developmeM~ tie mapr regroral~lraret~ mar ~r b gn~lof at least 15,000 square feet par site or protect Tins prowslon Is mtendetl to faahtale the tlevelo ant of large. rag N . Relatetl Commeraal uses are typdied by large scale Duslrresses which sane a market area srgnficantlY larger than those Duslriesses wroth draw astomers pnmanly imm the ne19ltborhootl or community level 5 Public Storage may De located m the RRC dlsmct only vnthm an enclosed buildup No outdoor storage Is permitted The public storage ~8ie first oaupy a portron of en ewsung retail bwltling provided the buildup Is at least 50,000 rtgo a M~~ O~Pa~m ~~ ~~ Brouu~ floor of Mabu lduMl 100 foot tlePth of storefront leasable area, and the public storage use does not oxupY 06/03 ~X~'!="F~L'T ~ Z 17 32-13 C~ ~~ ~~ F ~~ Rancha Cucamon a Develo ment Code Section 17 32 030 OFFICE AND ADMINISTRATIVE Subarea One Subarea Tiro Subarea Three Subarea Four USES M O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI O Administrative, Business end p p p p p p p p P P P' P Professional Offwes Banks, Finance Servx:es and p p p p p p p P P P P P insiduhons includm dove-thru P P P P Business and OHx;e Servces P P P P p P Intenor Decoratin Finns P P P P P P p P MedicaVDental OHx;es and Related P P p p p p p p p` P Health Clinics O titian and O tometnst Sho P P P P P P P P P Realtors and Real Estate Olficres P P P P P P P P P P P p Travel Agencies P P P P P P P P P P PUBLIC USES Subarea One Subarea Tvro Subarea Three Subarea Four M O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI O C Transit Facilnies p Public Uhh Instellatwns RESIDENTIAL USES Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four M O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI O Sin le-Famil Detached P P P P Single-Family Attached (duplex, p p p p P P P P to lax, fou lax P P P P P P P Multi-Family Dwellings Ancillary Residential Uses p p p p P P P P lnies (6 or less) fec i e) Home~care b) On-site private recreation p p p p P P P P facddies Accessory Uses ctures St p p p p P P P P ru a) Accessory b) Home Occupetlon P P P P P P P P ~II ~..J HOTEL USES MU' O MR P Subarea Two SC CC O MR S MHR SC C ubare CO a Th LMR ree MR U MU Hotel/Motel Hotel Fecildies ma or P P P P C P AncAla Uses r Sfxr b /e p e ar e) Beeury b) Cafes ces S ervi c) Cetenng d) Cacktatl Lounge nventwn Facildies /C o e) Conference f lops f) Flonst S g) Gdt Shops azme Stores /Ma g h) Newspaper i) Pharmacies tt down) Restaurants (s t f ortne ion k) Tounst In I Travel A envies A A 1 Refer ro Subarea 4 Secbon 77 32 090 F 7 b (foolnOte 2) 2 All irMUStnal uses and development standards snail be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 1730 3 Sugea ro Master PWn requiremems WrsuaM to 1732 030 D 4 CommeraaVOffice uses rnaY be bated m the RRC tlismm only wiM the corxxarrent development of one mapr regxxlelty relaletl envier business of at least 15,000 square feet per arts or proles This prowswn rs intended to faalnate the development of large, regwnalty related uses Regwnaly Related Commeraal uses are typed by large scale businesses vouch serve a market area significantly larger than tlase businesses whbh draw wsromers pnmanly horn Na ceighborhootl or oommundy level 5 Public Storage may be located In the RRC distna only wfMin an endosetl butlding No outdoor storage is permmed Tire publb storage use may occupy a pomon of an ensarg retail bmldmg provwe0 the budding is at least 50.000 square feet, the public sroraga use tloea not occupy the firet 100 foot depth M storefront leasable area, and the public storage use tlces not oaxiDY more than 50 percem of the ground floor of the buil0lno ,~ ~ J~ 08/03 '~1`~5~33-T 17 32-14 CI ~"i ~~ F f V N ^^m l~ 6 O m m ' RRC ~ ~f LEGEND RESIDENTIAL LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL lMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MHR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL _SUBAR RR CC fl ~~ a D '' 4, a. 0 ^0 d 0 o I LI ,~, 4 (Part 1 of 2) ~' ---- ~ CC CO CC tl aa~ac~a ~ .~..N,..,~_ p ~$ i MR ' OOH' ODO ~ COMMERCIAL OFFICE PUBLIC SC SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL MU MIXED USE U UTILITY CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL O OFFICE P PUBLIC RRG REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL CO COMMERCIAUOFFICE ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA INDUSTRIAL LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLAN • A x 0 0 co n 0 v w N O 00 O • • s ~ s • X ~1 V N OD N ~~ MV ..D O LEGEND RESIDENTIAL LR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL lMR LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL MR MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL NWR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL • Q i dill, I UBAREA 4 a ~ art2of2 I I I I ~j[~ ~.J~ I I , LI LJ U~ ' ' I I~ I'7,,~''7 I ~ I , ----- ~~a OBI LI~ I I ~~~~TI V I I I m I ~I ~ I ~ I O I _ I C I m I I m I U I I C1 l y l 'I E I 8 I I t I U I I ~ I r I oOt I IvA - I (7 I O I ~~ ' I 1 I I I I I I a I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I COMMERCIAL Sc SPECIALTY CO OFFICE MMERCIAL MU MIXED USE PUBLIC CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL U UTILfTY O OFFICE RRG REGIONAL RELATED CO P PUBLIC MMERCIAL CO COMMERCIAL/OFFICE ~~ MASTER PLAN AREA INDUSTRIAL U LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PLAN J a In 0 O le IO ti V W N O O Victoria Hospitality Center Request for General Plan Amendment from Office Park to Community Commercial to the related Development Code Amendment to Foothill Blvd • Specific Plan, Sub Area 4 to allow for a conditionally permitted hotel use with a wet bar. Location The area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") that is the sublecl of these applications is the area known as the "Foothill Blvd Specrfic Plan Overlay" that is located within "Subarea No 4 of the Foothill District " Subarea No 4 consists of approximately 55-acres that is bounded by Sebastian to the south, Masi Drive to the west, 1000' west of Rochester, and Hyssop /Home Depot traffic signal to the North. The proposed protect site is an approximate 10-acre parcel located within Subarea No 4 that is also contained wthin the Foothill Blvd District Overlay zone ("Subject Property") The protect applicant, submits this request to accommodate a proposed mixed-use development that includes Office Park retail and Hotel ("Project") The Subject Property's General Plan land use designation allows the majority of the office park uses and limited retail uses, but does not allow for a hotel use, despite this being previous reviewed in a development package History of the Subject Property and Request In the late 1980's the City received land use entitlement applications for the Subject Property to construct amixed-use office hotel project that was approved in the early 1990s The applicant then purchased the property assuming that the since the property had already been approved for a hotel, retail/office park, which had expired, he would be able to submd for a new application for the desired hotel retail use. The applicant met with Nancy Fong, Senior Planner in summer of 2004 and presented the old and new sde plan in anticipation of the submittal After revisions from the direction from planning staff, the applicant submitted the project in April of 2005 with a subsequent submittal in August of 2005 The applicant then contracted Charles Joseph Associates, which in their due diligence determined during their initial review of the project and development code that there was an inconsistency with what was approved previously and the Development Code for Sub Area 4 This was verged in our meeting with Planning staff the first week of November In accordance with the Planning direction, the applicant has filed for a General Plan Amendment to update the zoning from Office park to Commurnty commercial to allow for the intended use of the property owner as per the previous approvals with the City and planning meetings and discussions After review by Senior City staff and the City Attorneys office, it was determined that a General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment would be more appropriate to amend the text in both documents in a more comprehensive and reasonable manner for the proposed project filing. As such, we would respectfully request the following amendments to the General Plan for and Development Code Amendment and guidelines Proposed Foothill Blvd. Signalized Median Break A Request for a General Plan Amendment to the General Plan Table III-12 • Major Divided Arterial Interserfion spacing Location The area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") that is the subject of these applications is the subject area known as "1000' east of Foothill Blvd" The proposed application falls under the "Foothill Blvd Specific Plan Overlay" generally located within "Subarea No 4 of the Foothill Distract" Subarea No 4 consists of approximately 55-acres that is bounded by Sebastian to the south, Masi Dnve to the west, 1000' west of Rochester, and Hyssop /Home Depot traffic signal to the North The 2 ("Subject Properties") affected properties are an approximate 10-acre parcel located within Subarea No 4 that is also contained within the Foothill Blvd Distract Overlay zone North of Foothill Blvd and East of Rochester Ave, and an approximate 15 acre property contained within the Foothill Blvd Distract overlay Sub Area 4 and Industnal Park Subarea 7 which occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard, and East of Rochester Ave History of the Subject Property and Request In the 1980's the City received a request for a protect located at the southwest corner of Rochester & Foothill In review of the circulation along Foothill and planned development and median traffic signals It was determined that a traffic • signal and median break should be allowed to facilitate the development at the south side and north side of Masi Drive and Foothill Blvd. Those ne~ghbonng properties fell under the Foothill Blvd Overlay Distract, lust as the subject property of this application At that time, it was determined and planned for the signalized median break would be located within the '/< mile restnction fora 6 lane major divided artenal roadway designation The Development Code was and still shows the exception in Table 17 30 010(D) for a signalized median break 1000' west of Rochester and is being modified under separate application. The subject property reviewed access to the site and determined that the amount of traffic along Foothill and the existing congestion at Foothill & Rochester created a bottleneck of traffic and prevented a positive flow of traffic into the subject property A site plan was drafted showing a signalized median break at the east end of the protect site which helped alleviate the need for westbound traffic to have to make a u turn at Foothill in order to enter the site. Concurrently, the revew of this site plan and traffic study for proposed hotel project to the north It was determined that the proposed Hotel protect to the north and estimated traffic trap generation onto Foothill Blvd would adversely impact the Foothill and Rochester signal The protect applicant met with Engineenng and Traffic staff and it was determined that one protect alone would not support a median break, however both projects combined could help alleviate the traffic congestion at the intersection, thus staff could support a signalized median break at this location The proposed median break would help with the current congestion at Foothill and Rochester and will be consistent with access to the proposed retail Ex~~r-~- ~-~ C, p, E, ~ a ~ 1 development to the south The protect will be a multi-use development known as Victoria Hospitality Center and is located at the NEC corner of Foothill and Rochester It will contain 1-two story office buildings on top of retail suites approximately 50,000 sf total, a 113 room limited service hotel (an extended-stay . type geared toward business travelers), 2 full service, free standing sit down restaurant of approximately 6,000 sf, and approximately 5,000 sf of bank drive thru, gas station mix of business and quick service casual dining (e g Bala Fresh, Quiznos, Coffee Bean, etc) All parking will be located on-grade in the interior of the development away from the surrounding thoroughfares, with all the major structures at the center of the site The design concept is to create a business center where all the business amenities for the employed office over retail tenants and neighboring uses are contained on site and include overnight accommodations for the business traveler The protect will employ extensive landscaping and quality architecture to create a high profile "place" in Rancho Cucamonga that should, in turn, attract the best tenants As such, we would respectfully request the subject property be allowed to access Foothill through a signalized median break approximately 1000' east of Rochester. General Plan and Development Code Attachments s WATER SERNCE SEWER SERNCE CLEC IRIGSERNCE ¢rur /U IURALWS$ERVICE iME PNO }FC IICN n[ r,urtcv i LANG USEUEGICNA nGV .wr,en r.w TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 17594 PORTIONS OF LOTS B AND 9 TRACT NO 7290 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 92, PAGES 22 ANp 23, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF SAN BERNAROINO COUNTY nEROCHESTER BOULEVARD SECTION A-A FOOTHILL BOULEVARD r ___ 4. /... ~~.1:6.9. SECTION B-B NOi i0 SCALE _ .I ~ _~ ~o ~__ ~~ L~ ~t~-. ~- _~ I ~__n~, '-I'_----- _~ a I n n- __ °' _-_-_-_ _ ~_-_--~ - ____ ..irk __ I J ~ n ~ C.+ 3 \ C Y` t~ 1~ V _._I * + ` 1 V ~ ~ . I N t `' `tMIPC lGLErlLE r• _ I~ ..~, '" x I• _ c. f'. r ~ • y+ p~ ti e 0U(pl],I Iff 1 A _ _ _ _ _ - ,- _ __ _ _ xor .o u4L m~..~.~..Rrt.esn~..~,.,..s..., ~s..ec~~..a.>:.e ASSESSQPE PARCELSNUMBER °3}1-i5}_,p 0}}L}3~~~5}-l`~ 014NER my •r •p 3p,y •c • • •m APi11WNI ENGINEER u3vp C• • ry• RECLMOEASEMENiS Q ...•c+r.m.e.uum+,+.~v+r a..euro ~~ "' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cRC mnsaoxs AssoclBtE}G Engineers.lnc u 1 s 1 ,~ ;,o,,,;p „°~;~ ,;a.°, °° ;;;~ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 17594 qT/-~ ~ m4 s0" ~~ s~I°'R}~' SQ4nE VICTORIA GARDEN BUSINESS PARK + 5 [fIdC5~3Z +C 1Pd I I >~ Il a: Fa q - - - F •.,. .~rty,y .. •...+,w e...... n Table III-I/A LEVELS OF HIGHWAY SERVICE aaaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaa=aaaaaa----aaaacaaaaaaaa------aa------aaaa-----a., ____ ______ ______ _____ Delay Range Volume to Level of (Sec. per Capacity Service Description Vehicle) Ratio A Excellent operation. All approaches to the 0-16 0- 59 intersection appear quite open,turntng move- ments are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. B Very good operation. Many drivers begin to 16-22 60- 69 feel somewhat restricted within platoons of vehtcles. This represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues start to form. C Good operation. Occasionally drivers may 22-28 .70- 79 have to wait more than 60 seconds, and back- ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D Fair Operation. Cars are sometimes required 28-35 .80- 89 to wait more than 60 seconds during short peaks. There are no long-standing traffic queues. This level is tvoically associated with desi¢n practice for peak periods. E Poor operation. Some long-standing 35-40 .90-1.00 vehicular queues develop on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes. F Forced flow Represents jammed conditions. 40 or Over 1.00 Backups Crom locations down-stream or on more the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the inter- section approach lanes; therefore, volumes ' carved are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow. aaaaaaaavaaaaavaaaaamsvvavaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaansaasavaaaasasasaaaaaas Source. Based on National Academy of Sciences, H~ahwav Capacity Manual. 1965 and the update of the manual. Rancho MEA-Section III ~ Ex~+~~ ~,tp1E,Fa~+ P.uwa M.a.t~ / o- FOOTHILL o- o- X00° ~` -u Icon -0 I'. CURB ~ ® ®® ° e PAD-A BANK -UP TRASH SO FT A7M ENC 4200 RI -UP I EP SIT ENTRANCE WALK UP ATAIS C' l1~. ~~ PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL SIX PHASE OPERATION, TO E COORDINATED WITH ROCHESTER AVE. 4 ~° o- o- o- • -I- v~ .b b ~ / DRIVE E~ Q BLVD 1' S0' AE Aesocleted Englneers~lnc. alp. ~ °IFt~ I/d6 (°0n Mt-U!1 PAno ENVIRONMENTAL • INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEG1A. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that R is the responsibdrfy of the applicant to ensure mat the applicahon is complete at the time o/ submrttal, Cdy staff will not be available to perform work regwred to pmwde missing mformabon Application Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains DRC2005-00365 and SUBTPM 17504 Protect Victona Business HospRalRy Center Tale Name 8 Address of pro/ect owner(s) 509 RoseMane Dine. Arcadia, Ca9f007 323-633.6460 Name 8 Address of developer or pmfect sponsor Chades Joseph Assoaates Chuck Buquet 10681 Foothill Blvd Surte 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person 8 Addmss Charles Joseph Assoaates, Chuck Buquel 10(181 Foothill Bivd SuRe 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone (909) 481-1822 Number Name 8 Address of person prepanng this form (d drNerent from above) As shown above • EXHIBIT K C ~ p, E , F a C~ In/ormahon indicated 6y asterisk (') is not required oI nonconstruchon CUPS unless otherwise requested by stall 1) Provide a full scale (&1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ect site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide aset o/color photographs, which show reprosentahve views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and hom the site hom the primary access points, which serve the site, and representative wows o/significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe) NE Comer of Foothill and Rochester Rancho Cucamonga, CA 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet i/necessary) 0227-152-18, and 0227-152-31 • 5) Gross Site Area (adsq ft) 8 92 6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area o/public stroets 8 proposed dedications) 8 22 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would aNect the protect sde (attach additional sheet d necessary General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Office Park to Community Commercial Development Code Amendment to allow hotel with a bar as conditionally permitted use See attachedlustfication information 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City o(Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the pro/ect General Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment Zone Change, Development Code Amendment, c ~,F Fay 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as R exists before the protect including information on topography, sod stability, plants . and animals, mature trees, trails and mails, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any exishng stmctu2s on site (including age and condition) and the use of the sfmctures Attach photographs of significant features described In addrton, site alt soumes of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and amheological surveys, traffic studies) Site is currently a vacant parcel with retaining wall structure, no landscaping, existing street improvements and street lights along Foothill and Rochester Power transmission poles to the east, Existing residential to the North existing home depot center to the west, and Di Carlo rock house to the south, surtounded by vacant land and Masi plaza to the southwest • 1O) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o/the site Srte all sources o/in/ormahon (books, published n;ports and oral history) Site historically had a viticultural use Srte has been subject to annual weed abatement and sods disGng for past 20 plus Years 11)Descnbe any noise soumes and their levels that now affect the site (aimrafl, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Existing noise sources from Foothill Blvd and Rochester traffic that will have minimal impact on any land use for this sde or Development of same Noise impacts and appropriate mdigation vnll be a component of the development application currently on file Nnth the city (DRC2005-00365 and SUBTPM 17504) i t I ~ . 12) Descnbe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnption of the site in terms o/ultimate use which will result from the posed protect Indicate if there a2 proposed phases fordevelopment, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) it necessary The proposed General Plan Amendment Zone Change & Development Code Amendment will allow for the proposed uses of protect already on file vnth the Clty There is a proposed median break filing separate from thls application to help ease the current congestion at Foothill and Rochester and will have access consistent with the access to the proposed retail development to the south The protect will be a multi-use development known as Victoria Hospitality Business Park and Is located at the NEC corner of Foothill and Rochester It will contain 1-two story office buildings on top of retail suites approximately 50,000 sf total, a 113 room limited service hotel (an extended-stay type geared toward business travelers), 2 full service, free standing sit down restaurant of approximately 6,000 sf, and approximately 5,000 sf of bank drive thru, gas station mix of business and quick service casual dining (e g Bata Fresh, Qu¢nos, Coffee Bean, etc) All parking will be located onttrade in the intenor of the development away from the surrounding thoroughfares, with all the mator structures at the center of the site The design concept is to create a business center where all the business amenities for the employed office over retail tenants and neighboring use are contained on site, and will Include overnight accommodations for the business traveler The protect will employ extensive landscaping and quality architecture to create a high profile "place" in Rancho Cucamonga that should, In turn, attract the best tenants • 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, including in/ormahon on plants and animals and any cuRurel, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of/and use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) West -Existing Home Depot center East -Immediately adtacent is the Edison Power transmission Imes Beyond being a Circuit City Retail Center South -Approximately 11 undeveloped acres, with an existing non-conforming residential house at the comer Currently In process for a retail development North - Existing single family residential trail the pmposed protect change the pattern, scale or character o(the surrounding general area of the protect This volt continue the exlsbng and newly constructed retail comdor along foothill and allow for a safer turn movement for the traffic generated by both businesses which will help the flow of traffic at this intersection and volt serve to ease Vaffic impact at Foothill Blvd and Rochester with signalized median break at the east property line, approximately 1000' east of Rochester • Indicate the type of shoR-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adtacent properties and on-site uses What methods ofsoundproofingare proposed 15) C, n,~~F a q This is a General Plan Amendment related to a filing The proposed uses will be consistent with the noise levels • Anhapated under the current zoning The specific uses allowed under the current zoning/ust does not allow for the type of undedymg uses pmposed under the applicahon currently on file with the City 16) Indicate pmposed removals and/or replacements o/mature or scenic trees There are no trees currently on the site The proposed plan involves extenswe new landscaping and the application rs for a General Plan Amendment Zone Change only at this Ume 17) Indicate any bodies o/water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Site is surrounded by an existing stone sewer system that this protect v~nll utilize and this is only for a General Plan Amendment only 18)Indicateexpectedamountofwaterusage (SeeAttachmentAforusageeshmates) Forlurtherclarrficahon,pleasecontact the Cucamonga County Water Distnc[ at 987-2591 • a Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gaUday) b CommemiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) 3000 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 6000 19)Ind~cate pmposed method of sewage disposal Sephc Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests if discharge to a sanitary sewage system is pmposed indicate expected daily sewage generahon (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For fudher clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987- 2591 a Resrdent~al (gaUday) b CommemraUlnd (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residenhal units Detached (md~cate range o/ pamel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size WA Attached (md~cate whether units are rental or for sale units) 21)AnUapated range of sale prates and/or rents • Sale Pnce(s) S to • Rent (per month) $ to 22) Speaty number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate anhapated household srze by unit type N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be ms~dmg wdhm the pm/ecK Contact the appmpnate School Drstncts as shown rn Attachment 8 a Elementary • b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commemral, mdustnal or mstrtutional uses The protect will be a multi-use development known as Victona Hospitality Center and is located at the NEC comer of Foothill and Rochester It will contain 1-two story office bwldings on top of retail suites approximately 46,000 sf total, a 112 room limited service hotel (an extended-stay type geared toward business travelers), 2 full service, free standing sit down restaurant of approximately 6,600 sq ft 8 4,200 sq ft, and approximately 6,500 sq ft of office/bank, 3,700 8 4,400 gas station mix of business and gwck service casual dining (e g Bata Fresh, Qu¢nos, Coffee Bean, etc) All parking volt be located on-grade in the intenor of the development away from the surrounding thoroughfares, with all the mator structures at the center of the site The only uses needed for this general plan amendment is the wider range of retail services and hotel consistent with what we believed was approved 15 years ago by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga 26) Total Boor area of commemial, mdustnal, or mshtutional uses by type See above descnphon for detarts • ~~~~ 3 ~ 27) Indicate hours of operation To be determined Office hours pnmanly dunng the day retail pnmanly dunn_a the evenings • Not know at this hme however office uses are anticipated to be pnmanly day time operations as that is the nature of the business T he gas station will be 24 hours 28) Number of Total To be determined, approximately 100 people would be a guess ,not know at this hme employees Maximum Shitt Time of Maximum Shift 29) Prowde breakdown of anhapated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cahon of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet dnecessary) Not know at [his hme 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City Unknown at this time, 100+ is a guess due to venous shin hours and weekends • 31)For commercial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-6283) Proposed protect will comply with All applicable standards Wall constmchon will run concurrent with grading to Minimize construction noise ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pm~ect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please indicate their response All agenaes contacted have indiceted their ability to provide adequate service to the protect site ~',T~ r- 3a • 33)In the known history of this property, has then: been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenalsv Examples ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but am not limited to PCB 5, radioactive substances, pest~ades and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known No 34) lMll [he proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples tested abovev I(yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location o(such uses, along wdh the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cat~on plans No • 1 hereby ceRr/y that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits prosent the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best of my ability, that the (acts, statements, and information prosented a2 true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that addibonal informabon maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date December2l~` 2005 Signatun: Title Charlie Buauet AssoGate - • GUASTI DU ADRANOL' CALIFORNIA 75 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGR S su• oNrwmc 15 ouwoNwnca.e X49 t nw 3330' t~- gl __ yyyy •~~~~L .... 2150 Wr=fEEfY51 -- 50/TNERN~ PACIf. • --~ _ W~~C"~ ~_-- ,__ /- y t `VIE`./'Y9 I __ ! .1)N r OA- r I y III n _~ _tktl~ /~ a ` Alamo PfOJ¢¢I Slt¢ ~ _- __ fcoT -e _ .onr r - µ - I`: Gr`:i~ r I : P`~ -~. C -~ i` __ __ _-- - ___ } ~ 4e wa ~ vnr r _' a~ / ._ I na 1 ~alh fE4 xda" - ow a.r.. •'i~ :d~ I! ~_ -- _ ~ _~ ~ q_W_ Isi~nd __ _ u;: t _ ~_ _ _ NTO fE - '~ i~ I ~_ ~ _ '_.-'ten °e'd' R-ac~basvr" ta.., -,7_ _ _ _ _'~" ~~ ~~iwi . ,.n. i ~ -Y- `_ s~- .m\. © Cam. ~ •I ~~~~ 6 "' ~ E E ~ lP a _ _ `_ J ' _ ! ~x.~.* ..~~... 1 I iIl /Y _~~ r Y- W M ~ ~ N - ~ _ i ~ - I % _ r M'1 - ~ 1 i 1,1 I.. ~" 1 I r ~ _ n IC t I , Wali 1 runt ~~ /' !~ t\ `I ~ I ~ awn 1 / e i ( ~ ~ r It _ _ ^ ~ r COC ]111N_G _ ,~ ! COI<r' .u nlrY ~~~= 1_a ~ -~_ N'pj, dV~" _ ~ ~ 1c~ y 1~~ Pun1 -I \e ~ L I ~L~F~L ,u ~ z - '- 1~ I 1 onf o..o ~i~,1 n -- I~~ - -' - - e' ~ ~ I I ~ ^ t __ _ - '1 a 4 1 ~ _ - /rpJ (~~ I~ / FREEWAY _ _ I " - SA E~~Wb~.,~ r p ~ ~s e R . 11) ~~ ~ ~ sa/L„cRj i. i ',"'~ :~ Cis! ~~ ~_ ~ 1 f l~ave~ _ _ j ~1 . ~~ wrc ~.... oy C, p, E, F 3~ v ~. ~~ ej F) ' V L' ~ W NI ~ VI ~-^ -~ T ~'„'~~ " 4u` U ~ O I t ci ~C Ki .. ~ ~~~ Im~° ig d I~t-' o, r ,m , ~ _ ~ o c ~'- • .~ N i ~~ H I c , U =`. Q J .- J - n _". t ~1 7r S O :~ ~_ ~; as n q Y- u1 T a 4l ti N i ,, , j /$ `. {}r }' 777 ee i ~ yy . 8 ti a V r ~ a w "~ I ~ Q z z I ~ F I m 6 I z tl O p J ~ I \ 5 I ~ o ~ I g ¢ w < t @ °~ I y N a I e Q S I I 1N3ry35Y3 IONINO) OOOIi I I # I 4 6 I a: B I o I !~ o fr~ N05103 VINNOifKJ Ntl3H1f105 1 1 t 5 ~ 1 EP I f ~~ C I I $Q ~ 3NN0 dO SAH ~ ~~ 6 § 7 4 4 § 4 5 i ~ 9 4 ~ 4 § 9 4 n ~ y 9 9 ~I 'a c § Ob l3N b' ~ uu § § 9 H 1 a 4 9 4 ; § g ~ { § ~ l c • c .$ 4 N 9 1 9 cr S 4 9 4 U 9 5 5 ~ a O ~ 9 § 4 4 4 § 4 y x L ~ 4 oti § IliN l§ 3Nr9N~H - ' LL L - g ~ O g @L@ g 4 9 9 4 9 p 9 i § , § P § g §''~[ § [~jj ~ l Y U I I ~ 3nN3nr N3<s3H~oa ~_ L 9 ~ ~ ~~ ` q ! g [ ~ ~ I 9 4 § § 1 1g ¢ • ~ I 1~ I I I 6 ~ 1~ : ~ j 4 1 ~ I 4 i 1 V 1 I N I § [ ~ I 4 i 1 i i ~ I 9 f ~ I _ ~ ~ I g g ~ '1 I L' I _ ' I § L ~ i [g y}[ ~J-z- i_ § § 4 ~ I~ e ~ 1 - , ~ / ~ I I 1 ,~ N 3LR,4 15h1 1 . C~ ~J i,. l i . ~ ~___. ,\ ~~ I , i Regional Related . ~ Commercial I i - -- -- ' -- -- -- „_~~= ~~ ecc e~~,~ 4 Open Space ~ ~ ~ n~,io~ar.•,~,v,n-.i,^~S ~ ~ IOpen:Space i i i U ' -- -~ ' -' ' - i+ '___ ~ G ` 7 ~ I -i ~ - ~-- ~~ __ -- -~ l - ~ , , - ~ - - - - - - -----~o. ~ I _ - ' ~ `s-= d - - ~ ~ '~ - - ; , I, _. . ~ i ! ~ 1 C~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ' ~. ~~~ . ~~ i a w z z q O ~s ~~ S 3• r; t~ ~~ y~ ~ e ~ i ~5~ .fl 1 0 U ~ ~ I ~, 3~ i ,t" i ~ I 3 ~ ~ ~~ it i •~ ~ , ~ z~ ~ ~ ~ U e e --_ __ -- - _. _ iii k ' . __ ____ ___ ~ i __ it , ~ ~ ~ ~' , ~ ~--=' ~i _ ~ il= ' ' ,' / ~ 1~ I 1 ----- -- ~1' ' ~'-Z- _ .---- -. - . 1 j ~a~ -r f ~ ~~~ Fj cnmumRap d3a ~_~ ....,. - O ioa-n-aeo «n = ~ - - ~ f ~ xn E _ __ __ 1 ~ '~ , 1 I - b ~ p l i i /~/- ___ ____ __ _ II \ -. - - - r$ I h f~ 1 ~ __ __ I` I` ~ ~ . I ~ et ~r e S ~ / A ~ ~ ~e ' ~ I A 9 l mn I 1 r 7_ ~ C ~ o € ~ ?}~~ _ ~e 1 _ •3~^ p e _ 1 ~ I L ~ . e ~ i [. I pv9 r_ 1 ~ ~ ~ V 1 1 ~ I I 11 S f o 1 = r ~ 0. o - - ~ P _ - , ~ o I R I = I ~ O / i I I Z / I u 1 ® \\~ / ~ 8 i ~~ ~~I \I ~ ~ i o 0 i I ~ I ~ 6 - 0 o 0 o 0 0 jF- G / I j ~ i f 1 G: r+~ I / 1 qqq~~~--- r~q.~- l/V/Y 7 l 0 ~ o i ` ~ • S8 8 R~ ~ y ~ [U i o 0 o o g ~_ _ _ __ 1 o f i ° r1 k 1 11 ~ i 1 I _ 1 ° ° t ~~ i 1" ~ ~y o 1~ 11 'k ~ V ~ o ° o i ~ OT 1 / 1 1 k l ~ 1 o 0 ~ ~ + \ l ~ o ° y 11 ~p ° 1 ~- I n 1 I I t, o ~ I o T ~ti V i Q I I ° 1 I I - / ~~ ~ ~~~ryryry{{{ a ~ - ° t ~ 7 FF I I I r y~y ~~ Ljj ~ FF F AA Y ` ° ° ~ { F~~. k.1 1 ~ ~ F~~C[ ~ ° I I 1 1 IA n O I ? 1 a ° ~ ' ~ ~ J o I 00 0 0; 0 ~' ~ I I ( I o a 1 q ~ 1 \ / ® ~ ~ o o -~" ~ 1~ - - t I .~ rr { , - ~ ~ ~ 1 i ' ,. o _ \ _ ~_ ~ C , ~ - / n -~ ' M 4 / I ~ ~ ~j a 4 0 ~: ~" ~ ~~ { 1 ` i dfl- - ~ i 1 I ~, n { a . - , \ - ' -_ - - ~ I - o ~ ~. ~ - i - ~ II I 1 ( I{_ _ ~ 1 I N ~ _ _ i Ci. 1 I O o / o ~ t ~,~ ~ l 1 I ~ i ~ i g?'a? ~ ~ _ o FASq / / t 1 ~_ ..;9 I I _ _ I ~ I ~ _ ; I ~- I c. o _ - ' 1 V 6 S I _ I - ~ I 1 Iv- • C • u City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, and DRC2005-01124 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01000 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element to allow a median break on Foothtll Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection that will be located less than the standard 1,320 feet intersection spacing requirement GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial on 8 21 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Development District Designation from Office to Community Commercial on 821 acres of land (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Community Commercial Distract land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels and major hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within major hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17594 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 8 21 acres of land into 6 parcels for commercal purposes in the Office Professional District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN 0227-152-18 and 31 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00365 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail bwlding totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 8 21 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-1 B and 31 VARIANCE DRC2005-01124 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to allow a maximum bulding height of 55 feet where a maximum bwlding height of 45 feet is allowed for the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad bwldings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail building . totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office bulding totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet on 8 21 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Cfp, E,F 39 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 2 2. Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2004-00874 3. Description of Project: The protect entails the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad buildings, atwo-story office budding, a bank and office building, and a gas station with convenience store and food court at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue To facilitate the proposed protect, a number of entitlements are required, including a change to the General Plan land use designation and Development District designations for the two existing parcels that currently comprise the site, and approval of a parcel map to create six new separate parcels The protect also includes a Development Code Amendment to amend the Community Commercial District land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add a hotels, motels and mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use A General Plan Amendment to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard less than 1/4 mile intersection spacing requirement is also being requested The following table is a summary description of the current land use designations and uses and a breakdown of the other elements of the protect Current Land Use Designations and Development Existing APN Lot Area Existing General Plan Desi nation Existing - Zoning , Desf natlon Existing Use Vacant Land 0227-152-18 5 45ac Office Office (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts Vacant Land 0227-152-31 2 75 ac Office Office (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts To permit the proposed protect consisting of a hotel, office, retail, bank, and service station with convenience store, the current land use designations and development district designations must be amended to a land use designation that allows for hotel and retail development Concurrent with the General Plan and Development Distract legislative entitlements, the applicant has submitted a parcel map to create six parcels The proposed lot sizes and their new land use designations are summarized in the following table • J • Rev 4/20/05 v 1 ~l ~ f ~ ~ O Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 3 Tentative Lot Proposed General Proposed Zoning Proposed Future Parcel Map Area _ Plan Designation Designation Uses 17594 Parse! Number 1 83 ac Community Commercial Community Commercial ganWOffice (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts 2 1 33 ac Community Commeraal Community Commercial Service Stabon and (Subarea 4) Foothill with Food Court Boulevard Districts 3 2 16 ac Community Commercial Community Commercial Office and Retail (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts 4 79 ac Community Commeraal Community Commeraal Restaurant (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts 5 83 ac Community Commeraal Community Commeraal Restaurant (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts Community Commeraal Community Commeraal Hotel 6 2 O6 ac (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: The present General Plan Designation is Office The pro)ect proposes changing the General Plan Designation to Community Commercial 6. Zoning: The present Development District Designation is Office (Subarea 4) Foothill Boulevard Districts The pro)ect proposes changing the Development District Designatton to Community Commercial 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The pro)ect site is located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The site is presently vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the ma)ority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes No buildings occupy the pro)ect site To the north is asingle-family neighborhood, and to the west, across Rochester Avenue, are the Spaghetti Factory restaurant, Home Depot, and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is predominantly vacant land with one single-family residence (i e , Aggazzotti Winery, a Designated Point of Interest). To the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number. Donald Granger, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 Rev 4/20/05 ~ I Dt ~ 1 ~ ~ I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 4 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used m this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx-Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this prolect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Sigmf~cant Impact," "Potentially Sigmficant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics ()Biological Resources ()Hazards 8 Waste Materials ()Mineral Resources O Public Services ()Utilities 8 Service Systems (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Hydrology & Water Quality (/) Noise ()Recreation (/) Mandatory Findings of Signrficance _ (/) Air Qualty (/) Geology & Soils ()Land Use & Planning (/) Population & Housing (/) Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this rnit~al evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed prolect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the prolect have been made by, or agreed to, by the prolect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared Prepared By Date ~7_0/ o~ Reviewed By Date 2 C~ J • r1 L~ Rev 4/20/05 ~ ~ ~t ~/ r • r 1 L J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005.01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 5 Less Than Sipmhcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 F[tannally 99mfi[ant wan MNpaOOn man Sipmficant No I a[t Inco retea I act I aq EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the protect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rack outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () (/) ( ) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () (/) () ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga The Foothill Boulevard District calls fora 14-foot wide raised landscape median As noted in the above protect descriptions, the protect is concurrently applying for a General Plan Amendment to allow a signalized intersection less than the standard 1/4 mile spacing Since the protect proposes median break less than standard 1/4 mile spacing, the protect will result in the loss of approximately 400 feet of landscape median The nearest existing median break occurs approximately 660 feet or 1/8 mile east of the proposed median break With the proposed protect, there will be two median breaks between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard The distance between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard is approximately 2,400 feet, 240 feet less than a 1/2 mile The two median breaks less will cumulatively result in a loss of lust over 1/B mile of landscaping The loss of the landscaping for the median breaks, as analyzed from the total lineal distance between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, is considered to be less-than-significant • c) The protect site is located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The site is presently vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the matority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes No buildings occupy the protect site To the north is asingle-family neighborhood, and, to the west, across Rochester Avenue, is the Spaghetti Factory restaurant, Home Depot and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, is predominantly vacant land with one single family residence (i e , Aggazzotti Winery, a Designated Point of Interest) To the east is an Edison Power Line Corridor The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design Review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution Rev 4/20/05 C t~ t E j r 1 3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 6 less man $ignifitant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sipmficant witn Mitigation man SipniM1Cant No I ct Inco ratetl I act I atl d) The protect would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on-site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site A photometric diagram should be regwred at plan check to demonstrate that all illuminahon levels will meet or exceed the Citys allowable foot candle requrements and not cause glare on the residential uses to the north The following mitigation will reduce the impact to aless-than-significant level 1) A Photometric diagram shall be submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance demonstrating that dlummatlon from the project Is confined within the project's boundaries and meets the City's foot candle requirements. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is presently vacant with sparse vegetation and weeds covering the matority of the site The site has evidence of discing for weed abatement purposes There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • • b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no • Williamson Act contracts within the City Rev 4/20/05 ~ t ~ 1 ~ t F ~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 7 Less Than Sgnificam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Paenhaliy Si9Nficam wpm NLfigaOm roan Sipmficam No I ad Inco ratetl I act I ad c) The site is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and an Edison Transmission corridor to the east The nearest agricultural use, a landscape nursery and a small remnant vineyard, is located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately an 1/8 of a mile southeast of the site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated u 3. AIR QUALITY. Would fhe pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality wolaUon~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Pian for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels Rev 4/20/05 C r D t E, F y 5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 8 Less Tian SignJmam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potanbally Sgnd¢ant Witfi MNpabon Than Sipruficant No 1 act Inco orate0 I atl I acl 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the Issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air duality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Stall. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMip) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 4/20/05 ~ / ~ t ~ ~ F _ 1 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005.01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005.01124 Paae 9 Less men 5'pmficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potenfially signifiwm won Mrtipamn roan Significant No I act Into ratetl I ad I C 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~g) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council . In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant ii they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left Idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • Atter implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council Rev 4/20/05 ~ / Q ~ ~ r ~' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 10 Less man Sipnfcant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgn~ficant Mrtipaoan $~ rvficant No ~ act Into tetl ~ act ~ c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a sigmficant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create sigmficant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 Accordmg to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located withm 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is adtoining nearest sensitive receptors, single-family residences, to the north The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels • e) Typically modern service stations (with gasoline sales only, no auto repair), office • bwldings, business retail, hotels, and restaurants do not create obtectionable odors The service station, located at the corner of Foothtll Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, is located over 200 feet from the nearest single-family residences No adverse impacts are antiapated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any speces identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identfied in local or regional plans, pollees, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites • Rev 4/20/05 ~ r ~ , c , C L.) • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 11 Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotenaally sign,ficant wan Mdiganon roan $,gruficant No I act Inca tad I ad I C e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The prolect site is located in an area developed with retail and residential uses To the north is an existing single-family neighborhood, and to east is an Edison Transmission corridor To the west, across Rochester Avenue, is a Home Depot, restaurant, and automotive repair The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, prolect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no trees, small or heritage size, on the prolect site, therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur C 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Rev 4/20/05 C, a, E, F ~q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 12 Less man Siprvficant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenaally Sipruficant wren Mnipavon man SipiaficaM No I ad Into ratetl I C I h Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation). There are no structures on the prolect site There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shali be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require Incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age° and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per Generai Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to u • Rev 4/20/05 C, a t ~ , ~ 5O ~ 1 I~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 13 Less Tnan Signrt¢ant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP 9 Potanoally Sgnilitant Wrth MRpa-on Than Signilcant No I act Inro tetl I act I act monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by surrounding developments and annual disc~ng for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No evidence is in place to suggest the prolect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction Rev 4/20/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 14 Lass Than $ipnificant LBas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially $gnificant wnn Mifipaeon man sgniewnt No I ecl Inco 2tetl I ecl I act iv) Landshdes~ O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or sod that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial asks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) -of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is d in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hili Fault, passes within 2 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles north of the protect site These faults are both capable of producing M,y 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to My, 7.5 earthquakes, is located approximately 13 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is located approximately 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Unform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signrficant b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA~MD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,p emissions, in accordance with SCA~MD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMip emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. . 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~p emissions from the site during such episodes. Rev 4/20/05 Ct ai E r r ~°~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 15 Less Tfian Sgniheant Lass Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potentially Sipnifiwnt Wilfi MNpation Tian Sipmtiwnt No I an Into rated I act I an 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWDCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMto emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing agwfer The site is not within a geotechmcal hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or sod type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 51-2 Soil types onsite consist of Tutunga loamy sand soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of sods are not considered to be expansive Sod types onsite consist of Tutunga loamy sand soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 Runoff for Tutunga soils is slow to very slow, with slopes ranging from 0 percent to 5 percent No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • r ~ LJ 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a sigmficant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and acadent conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public avport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the wcirnty of a pnvate airstnp, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working m the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically intertere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan Rev 4/20/05 ~ r p, ~ i C Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 16 Less Than SipniLCant less Issues and Supportin Information Sources '°te"sally wnn Then g Significant Mmpaaon 99nificant No I fi°I Into orstetl I ael 1 act h) Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland ores, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect, specifically the gas station, will involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Mufti-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected • b) The proposed protect, specifically the gas station, does include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The protect includes a service station that will store underground fuel tanks housing automobile fuel Both the pump island and the underground fuel tanks will be required to meet the Federal and State requirements regarding fuel containment should a spill occur The County of San Bernardino Fire • District conducts annual inspections of the underground tanks to ensure compliance with Fire Codes The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the protect site The protect site is located within 1 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school Typically, the uses proposed (office, retail, hotel, restaurant, and service station) do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. There are no structures on-site that will require demolition No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Protect site is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west • of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of Rev 4/20/05 ~ f ^' ~ f ~ 5 r1 U Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 17 Less Tien Spna¢ant Less Issues and Supportng Information Sources Fotenaany Sipmhcant wan Mifipauon man Sipmhcent No I act Inco oratetl I atl I act a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Intertace area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the protect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit m aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp t) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Rev 4/20/05 ~ t ~ f c ' ~ ~ F, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 18 • Lest Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenaaily Significant With Maigaoon Tnen Sipnilcant No I ect Inco rateE I act I atl Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of • erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Pertorm inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the protect construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Associate Engineers, June 9, 2005, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oiVgrit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Achvrties • 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Rev 4/20/05 ll f 11i E , ~ GJ/ i Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005.01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 19 Less Than SIpNnC&a LESS Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Patamla-y Slprufirant wan Mlupanon man Slp,uficant No I n Intro rateE I n 1 n (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. • 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water duality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers, June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, Including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Ponding areas on the south side of the protect are depressed to promote the retention and infiltration of treated runoff and irrigation water. 8) Rooftops drain to landscaping prior to entering the storm drain system. 9) Collection inlets provided with trash guard/grate. 10) Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before entering infiltration area • b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVN/D has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area Rev 4/20/05 Cl t pi E t ~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 20 Lass Tnan SiOn'ticant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially SiOnficant WiN Mnipaoon Than 90rxficant No 1 acl Inro lay 1 I ct designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surtace As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the prolect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered sigrnficant d) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape . proposed on a site, however, the prolect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surtace water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The prolect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bulding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticpated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surtace water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 11) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Rev 4/20/05 ~1 t Qi E I ~' FJg' • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005 01124 Paqe 21 Lass Then S,gmhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially 5ig,uficant WitM1 Mingaoon TM1an S,pnifiwnt No I C Incg 218E I acY 1 acl 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (I.e , a copy of the Waste Dlscharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this prolect No adverse impacts are expected h) The prolect site Is not located within a 700-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected r1 LJ The Rancho Cucamonga area Is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system Is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the Clty, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically divide an established commundy'~ O U U (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (~) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the prolect (Including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan O O O (~) or natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The prolect will not physically divide an established community because the residential neighborhood to the north well not change and no new public streets are proposed The site Is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, and Is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, and an Edison Transmission corridor to the east To the west, across Rochester Avenue, Is the Spaghetti Factory, Home Depot, and other retail uses To the south, across Foothill Boulevard, Is vacant land and the Aggazzottl Winery, a Designated Point of Interest Rev 4/20/05 C, p, E , ~ 59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 22 Less Than SigniLcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources FWanfially w~tn man S,gruficant Mingaaon Sigrvfieant No I Inco ted I acn I b) The prolect entails the development of a master plan for an office and commercial center consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad buildings, atwo-story office building, a bank and office building and a gas station with convenience store and food court at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue To facilitate the proposed prolect, a number of entitlements are required including a change to the General Plan land use designation and Development District designations for the two existing parcels that currently comprise the site, and approval of a parcel map to create six new separate parcels The prolect requires a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial • The prolect also includes a Development Code Amendment to amend the Community Commercial Distract land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add a hotels, motels and major hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within major hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use A General Plan Amendment to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard less than 1/4 mile intersection spacing requirement is also being requested This prolect will be of similar design and size to the two nearby commercial developments located at the southwest and northwest corners at Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue The prolect Site Plan has been designed to reduce impacts to aless-than-significant level through the City's The prolect site land use designation is office To facilitate the proposed master-planned prolect, a number of entitlements are regwred including a change to the General Plan land use designation and Development District designations for the two existing parcels that currently comprise the site The prolect requires a General Plan Amendment and Development Distract Amendment to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial As part of the legislative amendment process for the General Plan and Development District Designation changes that are proposed, the City will determine whether the changes are appropriate for the site in question and that the changes will more effectively implement the General Plan goals and objectives If approved, subsequent development and use of the site will also be required to be consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, and the policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The prolect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan • Rev 4/20/05 C1 , f1 ~' ~' ~,p~ r L Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 23 Less Than 99mficant Lew Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fctenballr Significant wnn Mmganon Than Significant No I act Into retetl I el I act Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact • 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase m O (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect wdhin the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out The protect site will be exposed to exterior traffic noise levels greater than 65 dBA within 429 feet of Foothill Boulevard, and greater than 65dBA within 108 feet of Rochester Avenue Since the protect includes a 107 room hotel that will provide temporary lodging facilities, an acoustical analysis of the protect site was completed by Davy & Associates, Inc With the use of standard construction practices and all south facing windows and glass doors utilizing STC32 glazing, the rental rooms in the hotel will meet the City's interior acoustical requirements of 40dBA The study recommends that a final acoustical analysis be completed at the time Building Permits are applied for in order to analyze any necessary building upgrades including, but not limited to, upgraded exterior windows . The protect has been designed so that the office, retail, bank, and hotel uses are plotted to provide a sound buffer from the more intensive service station and restaurant land uses Also, is designed so that the bank, office/retail and hotel buildings have been plotted at significant distance from the single-family residences to the north The bank, Rev 4/20/05 C f p t t~ F Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 24 Lass Than Sipnihcant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Gotenaally S,9^~ficant Wnh Miapaaon Than $ipnificam No 1 C Into tad I 1 office/retail, and hotel buildings are located between 80-100 feet from the north property of the protect that is the boundary line between the nearest single-family residences and the commercial protect The mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels 1) Extenor: An 8-foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property line in order to provide a sound attenuation and privacy between the single-family dwelling units to the north and the project 2) Interior: All south facing windows and glass doors in the hotel building shall have an STC rating of 32 or greater. 3) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40 dBA for the hotel rooms, the building materials, and construction techniques required. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report. b) The uses associated with this type of protect (office, services station with no auto repair, restaurant, retail and hotel) normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 6) The perimeter block wall along the north property line shall be constructed as early as possible. r1 ~J Rev 4/20/05 l~ i Q i E f r tf1 l J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 25 Leas man Siptufiwnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP Id I=meneanr S~pmlicant wnn Mrtipaeon man Sipmfcant No I act Into rateE I att I an The preceding mitigation measures well reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () (/) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments• a) The prolect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Also, it is anticipated that following construction a majority of the employees working at the prolect site will likely be hired from within the City or the surrounding communities Additionally, Rancho Cucamonga is presently one of the 10 fastest growing cities in the United States The City is presently experiencing a construction boom that is generating new housing stock of all types (apartments, single-family dwelling units, condos, and town homes) The impact is considered to be less-than-significant No adverse impact expected L -1 b) The prolect site contains no existing housing units and will involve the demolition of any structures No adverse impact expected c) The prolect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated Rev 4/20/05 ~ f ~ f ~ t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 26 Less Tfien Sipmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fclentially Signd¢ant w~tn Miogauon man 9prufitant No I acl Inro rated I act I acl 73. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause signs/scant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () (~) b) Police protectioM O O O (~) c) Schools () () () (~) d) Parks () () () (`~) e) Other public faahties~ O O O (~) Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, would be served by Fire Station 173, located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, t/a mile north of Base Line Road The fire station is approximately 1 1/2 miles from the prolect site, which meets the Fire District's Strategic Master Plan by being within the 4 minute response time goal The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Police protection and routine patrols of the site and surrounding areas is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga substation of the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the prolect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the prolect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District The prolect will be regwred to pay school fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of Building Permits No impacts are anticpated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 1/4 mile from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services Rev 4/20/05 /1 i D i ~ r ~ ~ (.~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 27 Less Than SipmLCant Less Issues and Supportrng Information Sources Patemia~~y SpmM1Cant wpm Mitipabon rnan SgniM1Cant No I an t^co eta0 I act 1 an According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the enwronment~ Comments: a) The site is m a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 Ya miles from the prolect site This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above • 15 TRANSPORTATIONlfRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle taps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either indrndually or cumulatively, a level of () () (/) ( ) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) Rev 4/20/05 C, p, C,F(~`J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 28 Less Than $,ymficent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Petenaaily Sip,nficant wen Minpeuon rnan Sipn,ficant Na I Inrn rete0 I C I ed e) Result in inadequate emergency access O U O (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O U (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments: a) A traffic study was prepared by Transtech Engineers, Inc , that concluded the implementation of the proposed protect will generate 494 p m ,two-way peak hour trips The proposed protect includes the development of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office budding totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office budding totaling 6,583 square feet, and a gas station with a convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan has identified a LOS E or better for all intersections. The application proposes also includes a Development Code Amendment to add hotel . uses within Community Commercial Distracts. A comparable retail protect in the Community Commercial Distract, using the same square as the proposed hotel (64,800 square feet), would generate 277 two-way peak hour trips, as compared to 78 two-way peak hour taps for the hotel The addition of hotel uses is less intensive than comparable retail protects in Community Commercial Districts with regard to two-way, peak hour automobile trap generation protections The application proposes a land use change from Office to Community Commercial. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model, Community Commercial uses generate 4 28 two-way peak hour taps per 1,000 square feet Office uses generate 2 36 two-way peak hour trips per 1,000 square feet. The two-way, peak hour trap generation difference between the two uses is 1 92, lust under two vehicles This increase in the two- way peak hour trip generation between the existing (Office) and the proposed land use (Community Commercial) will be mdigated by the proposed median break on Foothill Boulevard near the east boundary of the protect (see discussion under b below) The median break will improve the existing intersection operation at Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. According to a Traffic Signal Warrant Study by Wildan, the delay would improve significantly from 2377 seconds to 952 seconds This improvement is because of relief of westbound left turning volumes at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, by providing a westbound left turn movement at the proposed signal location Also, the median break would not only relieve not only the westbound left turn movement on Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue, but also the northbound left turn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The protect site will be • required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, in order to comply with Measure I, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid Rev 4/20/05 C t ~Jf E r F (,p f Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005.01006, DRC2005.01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, . AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 29 Less marl Si9rvlcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Fo~emianr Siparncam wen M,ogenoe rnan soraficam No I n loco ted I ~ an by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation The impact is considered to be less-than-significant b) According to the traffic study prepared by Transtech Engineers, Inc , implementation of the proposed protect will generate 494 p m ,two-way peak hour trips which is less than the 1,000 two-way peak hour taps for retail land use, therefore, the protect is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for regwnng a traffic impact analysis In addition to being below the County's threshold for a CMP analysis and in compliance with Measure I, the City has adopted a comprehensive transportation fee schedule to ensure that all new development pays its fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG), which acts the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA), has reviewed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's transportation fee impact schedule and found the City's transportation impact schedule to be an acceptable method of mitigating transportation impacts As a result of the City's comprehensive transportation fee impact schedule, SANBAG has issued a letter that waives the County's CMP TIA analysis requirement for all new development protects within the City of Rancho Cucamonga through November 2006. • The protect proposes a median break in order to construct a traffic signal at the eastern boundary of the protect The median break and signalized intersection will be spaced less than the standard 1/4 mile intersection spacing as identified in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan In order to support the request for a median break, the applicant has aligned the signal with entry points for two commercial protects one located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and the other located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Willdan (December 2005) prepared a traffic signal warrant study and analyzed the Level of Service (LOS) for the existing Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard intersection, the intersection at Masi Drive and Foothill Boulevard and for the proposed intersection at the easterly boundary of the protect The traffic signal warrant study states that under past-protect conditions without the median break, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue declines to an unacceptable LOS F during both the a m and p m peak hours Under post protect conditions with the median break, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue would operate acceptably during the a m peak hour (LOS C), but would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F during the p m peak hour The delay, however, would improve signdicantly from 237 7 seconds to 95 2 seconds This improvement is because of relief of westbound left turning volumes at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, by providing a westbound left turn movement at the proposed signal location With the ultimate improvements of a dual westbound at eastbound turn lanes on Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue, the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue would improve from a LOS C to be B in the a m peak hour and from a LOS F to D during the p m peak hour The study also states • that the LOS at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive would still operate at an acceptable level of service and not be negatively or positively affected by the proposed median break and signal at the eastern boundary of the protect Also, the median break would not only relieve not only the westbound left turn movement on Foothill Boulevard at Rev 4/20/05 1,:. t D i E r~ ~0 1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 30 Less T"en Slprufiwnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'e""°"Y Sipruficant w"" r.Lapabon The" 9pnficeM No I Inco letl I I el Rochester Avenue, but also the northbound left tum movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard Wdh a median break and full improvements to Foothill Boulevard (dual east and west turning movements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue), the intersection where the proposed signal is located would operate at a LOS B during the a m and p m peak hours The study also states that the median break will also provide relief for the northbound left turn movement on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard by mlhgating stacking The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed and concurs with the proposed traffic signal warrant analysis and median break prepared by W Ildan The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The prolect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The prolect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The impact is considered to be less-than-significant c) Located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated. • d) The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide • street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or fanning uses The prolect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The applicant is requesting a reduction in the amount of required parking based upon a shared parking analysis The City's Development Code acknowledges that there are opportunities where shared parking may be appropriate Charles Joseph Associates prepared a shared parking analysis of the mixed use prolect site consisting of a hotel, two restaurant pad bwldings, a two-story office and retail building, a bank and office building, and a gas station with convenience store and food court and concluded that the site presents an opportunity for shared parking Shared-use parking studies are based on industry research regarding parking generation rates and utilization patterns Research organizations such as the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and the Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE) have conducted extensive research to determine peak hour parking demand The planning staff evaluated the shared parking analysis by Charles Joseph Associates (CJA) and compared datum from a parking study prepared by Walker Parking Consultants (2005) for a similar prolect that consisted of a hotel, two office buldings, a restaurant and two pad commercial buildings. Walker Parking Consultants has extensive experience in parking analysis and shared parking, having participated in the recent update of the ULI landmark study of mixed-use developments . The shared parking analysis for the prolect site by CJA is based on research that certain protects can effectively share a pool of parking because of two primary phenomena that occur in mixed uses 1) offset peak hour parking demands that occur between certain Rev 4/20/05 C t~ l C f • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 31 Lass man 5,9rvhcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotanaallr Sipmficam w~tn Miopaaon Than Significant No I Imo retatl I act I act uses and 2) a certain percentage of vehicles well utilize more than one use on the prolect and are classified as "captive " Offset peak hour relationships occur when two or more uses, such as an office having peak hour parking demands between the hours of 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m and a steakhouse that is open after 5 00 p m ,are able to utilize a significant amount of parking stalls from the same parking pool Land uses with offset peak hour parking demands can mutually benefit from the same parking pool because of a phenomenon known as static net parking demand Static net parking demand is defined as the actual parking demand of a specific use at a specified time For example, a steakhouse that is open for dinner only will have a have static net parking demand of 0 between the hours of 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m As such, stalls that would be allocated for a steakhouse under traditional parking count calculations can be utilized by a daytime use, such as office Actual parking demand can be also reduced because some customers will already be present or "captive" for existing uses (i a office worker who walks to the on-site restaurant for lunch) Vehicles that are coming from off-site and create a parking demand are referred to as °non-captive ° Thus, the actual parking demand is not the simple sum of all proposed uses, but a calculated demand based upon peak hour use that factors in static net parking demands, non-captive and captive ratios Since the prolect consists of 29,600 square feet of office, 23,000 square feet of retail, and a 112 room hotel, the likelihood of captive use among the proposed mixed-use prolect is moderate to significant As noted above, Walker Parking Consultants has extensive experience with shared parking analysis On a previous analysis done by Walker Consultants for a prolect that had a similar land use composition, a 25 percent captive ratio for retail and sit-down dining and a 35 percent captive ratio for fast-food was utilized For this prolect, based upon the proposed square footages of retail and office use, staff utilized a more conservative 10 percent captive ratio for retail and sit-down dining Avery conservative 10 percent captive ratio for fast-food was utilized All uses were calculated with 100 percent occupancy assumption Based upon prior parking studies and the proposed land use composition, the peak hour parking demand for all land uses will be in the early afternoon (1 00 p m. - 3 00 p m) During the early afternoon, the office and retail uses will be at peak use, and the sit-down restaurant, although not a peak use, will still be generating a significant amount of cars The applicant is requesting a reduction of 42 parking stalls or an 8 percent reduction of the Development Code requirement of 508 stalls to 466 The 508 stall figure is based upon a traditional parking calculation, adding up the total amount of required parking based upon each type of land use using the City's Development Code parking stall ratios During the early afternoon peak hour parking demand, planning staff calculates that the total amount of required shared parking will be 453 stalls The 453 stall count includes a conservative cushion of 15 percent The prolect proposes 466 stalls, which is 13 stalls greater than the 453 peak hour stall requirement Some parking studies cite that the real estate standard for occupancy rates is actually 95 percent (100 percent occupancy was utilized for the proposed prolect) If the 95 percent occupancy rate is factored into the shared parking analysis, the prolect will have additional available stalls as the amount of required parking drops based upon the real estate industry standard of a 5 percent vacancy rate Further, as the City continues to develop and more restaurants and retail services are constructed, • the non-captive ratios should fall, thereby adding more stalls to the protected 13 stall surplus No impacts are anticipated Rev 4/20/05 C ~ ~i E ~ F ~(! ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 32 . Less Than SiOmhcant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g P°'°""ally Sipnihtant w"" Mitipaaon Than Si9n~ficant No I act Intro rete0 I eel I g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the protect a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Requre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage faalities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empve Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the regwrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant, located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1, located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to • handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwiding Offiaal and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered signrficant Rev 4/20/05 ~1 t~ I C l r l Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, . AND DRC2005-01124 Page 33 Less Than SipnAicanf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g `°le"dally Spnificanf w"" MmpaOOn Tnan Sipn,hcenf No I an Inco tea I en I an d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana and a tract in Upland The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is 41 7 million gallons per day (mgd) Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for protects that exceed the following sizes 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet, 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet, 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms, 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet, 6) mixed use protect including one or more of the protects specified above, 7) any other protect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or grater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit protect, and 8) any protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system Under SB 221 a Water Supply Assessment is required when. 1) a . protect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, 2) a protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system, and, 3) applies to development agreements that include such subdivision The protect is served by the CVWD water system The proposed protect does not exceed any of the above-cited thresholds for a water analysis There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated ~J Rev 4/20/05 lit ~t E , F 1 I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Paae 34 Less Than Sipnihtant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pP g vpten"ally Significant w.m Minpauon Than spnificant No I act Into reteE 1 an I act 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dvectly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare speces would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is requred • c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial • adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Rev 4/20/05 e r p r C. f r / • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 35 Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Ciwc Center Drive (check all that apply)• (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Water Quality Management Plan (Associated Engineers, June 2005) \J • (/) Acoustical Analysis (Davy and Associates, Inc ,June 2005) (/) Peak Trip Hour Generation Analysis (Transtech Engineers, August 2005) (/) Traffic Signal Warrant Study (Willdan, January 2006) (/) Shared Parking Analysis (Charles Joseph Associates, February 2006) Rev 4/20/05 C) ~, E , F ~ 3 Inttial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 36 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described m this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature Date ~ rf~ r0~ Print Name and Title ?^~n~rl (~ g URJt-#- • • Rev 4/20/05 n ~ ~r t ~ r I `J i' City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, and DRC2005-01124. Public Review Period Closes: April 12, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Assoaates Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN 0227-152-18 and 31 Project Description: A request to amend the General Plan Circulation Element to allow a median break on Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet east of the intersection of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard for the purposes of permitting a signalized intersection that will be located less than the standard 1,320 feet intersection spacing regwrement, a request to change the land use designation and development district designation from Office to Community Commercial, a request to amend the Community Commercial District land use regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels and mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use and cocktail lounges within mator hotel faalities as a Conditionally Permitted Use, and a request to subdivide 8 21 acres of land into 6 parcels for commeraal purposes in the Office Professional District, and the development of a master plan, with a request to allow a maximum building height of 55 feet where a maximum bwlding height of 45 feet is allowed, for an office and commeraal center consisting of a 112 room hotel, two restaurant pad buildings totaling 10,893 square feet, atwo-story office and retail building totaling 46,000 square feet, a bank and office building totaling 6,583 square feet and gas station with convenience store and food court totaling 8,189 square feet in the Community commeraal District (Subarea 4) within the Foothill Boulevard Districts, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but• (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment C,~tEYF~lS MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC2005-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005-00365, AND DRC2005-01124 . April 12, 2005 Page 2 If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. April 12, 2006 Date of Determination Adopted • • RESOLUTION NO 06-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01000, A REQUEST TO AMEND TABLE III-12 OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT IN ORDER TO ALLOW MEDIAN BREAKS LESS THAN 1/4 MILE SPACING ON MAJOR DIVIDED ARTERIALS SUBJECT TO A DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals. 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect amendment is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1 This Commission hereby specifically fords that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows• The application applies to Table III-12 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan, and b This amendment does not conflict with the Transportation Polines of the General Plan and will promote the goal and objectives of the Transportation Element by improving the existing Level of Service at intersections on Mator Divided Arterials where a detailed traffic analysis demonstrates that a median break less than the 1/4 mde sparing is warranted on a Mator Divided Arterial, and c. This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Transportation Element by permitting median breaks on Mator Divided Arterials when a detailed traffic analysis demonstrates that a median break less than the 1/4 mile sparing would improve traffic flow and • not hinder adequate two-way progression of traffic flows, and d This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-27 DRC2005-01000 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 2 surrounding properties, conversely, the amendment will provide opportunities for logical, controlled access points along Mator Divided Arterials less than 1/4 mile spaang, subtect to a detailed traffic analysis and approval by the City Engineer; and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a The proposed circulation amendment does not conflict with the circulation element of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development and orderly traffic circulation of the surrounding area, and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, and the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements m the vicinity, and c The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows. In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to • the Planning Commission dunng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-27 DRC2005-01000 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • April 12, 2006 Page 3 presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, an amendment to Table III-12 of the Circulation Element to allow median breaks less than 1/4 mde spacing on Mator Divided Arterials subject to a detailed traffic analysis and subtect to the review and approval of the City Engineer and shown as Exhibit A of the Draft City Council Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, and subject to the condition shown below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole • discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a • regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-27 DRC2005-01000 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 Page 4 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS • IL J • ~,a,E,Fgo RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01000, A REQUEST TO AMEND TABLE III-12 OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT IN ORDER TO ALLOW MEDIAN BREAKS LESS THAN 1/4 MILE SPACING ON MAJOR DIVIDED ARTERIALS SUBJECT TO A DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No 06-27 3 On May 17, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application • 4 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Councl hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal during the above-referenced public hearing on May 17, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows The application applies to Table III-12 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan, and b This amendment does not conflict with the Transportation Policies of the General Plan and will promote the goal and obfectives of the Transportation Element by improving the existing Level of Service at intersections on Malor Divided Arterials where a detailed traffic analysis demonstrates that a median break less than the 1/4 mile spacng is warranted on a Mafor Divided Arterial, and c This amendment does promote the goals and obfectives of the Transportation • Element by permitting median breaks on Malor Divded Arterials when a detailed traffic analysis demonstrates that a median break less than the 1 /4 mile spacing would improve traffic flow and not hinder adequate two-way progression of traffic flows, and C, D,E,F81 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2005-01001 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 Page 2 d This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, conversely, the amendment will provide opportunities for logical, controlled access points along Major Divided Arterials less than 1/4 mile spacing, subject to a detailed traffic analysis and approval by the City Engineer, and e The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Councl hereby fords and concludes as follows: a The proposed arculation amendment does not conflict with the circulation element of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development and orderly traffic arculation of the surrounding area; and b The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity, and c The proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the Califorma Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Counal, and, further, this Counal has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain sigmficant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative . Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council public ~,~, E,Fga CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2005-01001 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • May 17, 2006 Page 3 hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council approves General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, an amendment to Table III-12 of the Circulation Element to allow median breaks less than 1/4 mile spacing on Mafor Droided Artenals subfect to a detailed traffic analysis and subject to the rewew and approval of the City Engineer as identified in this Resolution and shown on Exhibit A and including the condition shown below Plannmq Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relmgwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • s l~ m T~ ~r TABLE III-12 ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES # o/ Lanes Median 2 lane No median Centerline Duect resdential access is IntersechoNaccess spaang Parking may be restncted al sloping typically not encouraged approximately 200 feet Intersecbons to meet Iineot- mGuded sinht rnm ummenls 2 lane Undivided Centerline Direct access from pnvate Intersection/aaxss spaang Parking may be prohibded to May be considered at selected intersections sloping Provide left tum residential properties should approximately 200 feet provide a left lum lane al where heavy traffic regmres a separate nght pockets at intersections be avoided intersections, or to meet line-of- turn lane with collector or higher sight requvements level sUeets Seeonda Arterial 4 lanes Stnped median where Direct access from pnvate Intersection spaang Not permitted along segments Should be considered at selected feasible residential properties should approximately 330 feet where a sloped median is intersections where heavy traffic requues a be avoided provided separate right turn lane Ma or Arter ial 4 lanes Painted Used for left turn Local residential sUeets should 1/8 mile for pnnapal Not permitted May be considered at intersections to movements not take direct access from intersections Left tum accommodate full-width nght turn lanes or major artenals No residential restrictions to be considered at dual-left turn lanes driveways minor unsignallzed dnveways if desired s aan not feasible Ma or Divi ded Arterial 6lanes Raised Used for dual left Lefl tum access allowed at '/. mile as a minimum Not permitted May be considered at intersections to tum movements at key signalized Intersections only Alternate median breaks may be accommodate full-width right tum lanes or intersections No residential driveways considered subject to a defatled dual left turn lanes traffic analysis and subject to the review and aooroval of the G En sneer Ma or Divi ded HI hwa B lanes Raised Used for dual left Left tum access allowed at % mile as a minimum Not permitted May be considered at intersections to tum movements at key signalized intersections only accommodate full-width right tum lanes or intersections No residential dnveways dual left turn lanes General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000 Exhibit A Resolution • RESOLUTION NO 06-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01006, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 4), FOR 8 21 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-152-18 and 31 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Assoaates filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On Apnl 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearng on the assoaated Development District application and issued Resolution No 06-29, recommending to the City Counal that Development Distnct . DRC2005-01002 be approved 3 On the 12th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application 4 Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on Apnl 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 8 21 acres of land, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, and ~s presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Office within the Foothill Boulevard Distracts (Subarea 4), and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units and has a land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre), • the property to the west is developed with venous commeraal uses and has a land use designation of Community Commernal, the property to the east has a land use designation of Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is a transmission corridor for Southern California Edison, and e, D, E, F s5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-28 DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 to the south, the properties have a land use designation of General Commeraal and are the site of the Aggazzotti home and former winery, a designated point of interest, and c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distract m a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the surrounding development by providing opportunities for office, hospitality and Commeraal land uses that will provide support uses and services for the nearby Regionally-Related Commeraal Districts located lust east of the protect site, and d This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for Commeraal, hospitality, food, and office uses to be developed under one land use designation utilizing master plamm~g, and e This amendment would not be materially incurious or detrimental to the adcacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, conversely, the amendment will allow for office, retail, hospitality and food uses to be integrated into a master planned development under one land use designation 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a That the subtect property is suitable for the uses permitted m the proposed district m terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use m the surrounding • area by allowing for Commeraal, hospitality, food, and office uses to be developed under one land use designation utilizing master plamm~g, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, and the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to the properties or improvements in the vianity, and The proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Counal adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negatve Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been • reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the procect, which are listed in the Mitigation Momtonng Program C,D,c,F 8(p PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-28 DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 3 c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which widlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map to change approximately 8 21 acres of land, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, from Office to Commurnty Commercial within the Foothil Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4) as identified m this Resolution by adoption of the attached City Counal Resolution and shown as Exhibit A of the Draft City Counal Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and including the condition shown below Plannino Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST • Pam Stewart, Chairman Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary ~,D,E,F87 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-28 DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 Page 4 • I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C~~tE~F O~ RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-01006, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 4), FOR 8 21 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-152-18 AND 31 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject amendment is referred to as'Yhe application " 2 On Apnl 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated Development District Amendment and issued Resolution No 06-29, recommending to the City Counal that Development Distract DRC2005-01002 be approved 3 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application 4 On May 17, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the assocated Development District Amendment application and issued Ordinance No _, approving the associated Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002 5 On May 17, 2006, the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal during the above-referenced public hearing on May 17, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, • together with public testimony, this Counal hereby speafically finds as follows ~,D,E,rg~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2006-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 • Page 2 a The application applies to approximately S 21 acres of land, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Office within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4), and b The property to the north of the subtect site is developed with single-family dwellmg units and has a land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwellmg units per acre), the property to the west is developed with various commercial uses and has a land use designation of Community Commercial, the property to the east has a land use designation of Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is a transmission corridor for Southern California Edison, and to the south the properties have a land use designation of General Commercial and are the site of the Aggazzotti home and former winery, a designated point of interest, and c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district m a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the surrounding development by providing opportunities for office, hospitality and commeraal land uses that will provide support uses and services for the nearby Regionally-Related Commercial Districts located lust east of the protect site, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for commeraal, hospitality, food, and office uses to be developed under one land use designation utilizing master planning, and e This amendment would not be materially mturious or detrimental to the • adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, conversely, the amendment will allow for office, retail, hospitality, and food uses to be integrated into a master planned development under one land use designation 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Counal hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subtect property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed distract m terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use m the surrounding area by allowing for commeraal, hospitality, food, and office uses to be developed under one land use designation util¢ing master planning, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, and the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to the properties or improvements in the vianity, and c The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Counal finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration • and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows C,p, E ~F90 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2005-01006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • May 17, 2006 Page 3 a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project that are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Councl finds as follows. In considering the record as a whole, the Irntial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dunng the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations • 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Counal approves General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, an amendment to the General Pian Land Use Map to change 8.21 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, from Office to Community Commeraal within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4), as identified in this Resolution and shown on Exhibit A and including the condition shown below Planrnng Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relmgwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • Ct~~~tF~~ ~'e, 'ems ~ `H I ~~ o ~~ °}i _ t` ~ :y u _ ~~ ' a ~'., ~ °[y . ~ a V Regional Related " Commercial ' ~ Open Space ' i xO5ro3 nNt10iINJ Ntl3H1lrOS ' R " ;NbC E W ; <1 5~ E 5 J ~ ~ v 5 5; G S c ~. F s e 5 "r 5 ~ w '~ _ .. //yy~~~l___ ~ L ~ t ~Vq TM i 4 a5 i ° s 4 0 C 1' '2 a 4 a ~ Q I i ~ S / •~yJ( ~" 4 ~ 5 ~l 0 ~ ~ ~ 1 i~ '~ 5 5 I s t 5 s _L~~~.-_I IF. y L- -_ - ~~ 9 5 ~" _ f F b ! (~ ~ ~. _ _ _ ~__ -----r`-- --- -_nHL.r-a~is3uaoa I I ~n ',~~ ~ `` l~ ~ ~~ `~. ~ ~~g V- V lr ,,:. 1 I ~ General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 Exhibit A ~, Resolution n ~ ! ~ I --~ ~i~Fs .I i ,LYa, ~ c%, "v '_ L t ~'7' a g .~ ~~: ~ 3 ,~ c F v g x ~ ~ ~ . _~- S \\ I I ~~ I el ^ C ~~f~ yy ~ _ ~ I `a~" 3~" ' "r 1 f t ey M' I I ' '' ~ '^~ ~ w~ ~ i I vJ i i I j ~ E' I ~ p ~ ' a I :~ ~ ~~ i /J I' ~_~ I ~ 5!j R n 5 ____ • `C ' vy ''• ~;. ~.__ ~__ wi-9 ~~~ ~ 3nae Ism W % a la • • RESOLUTION NO 06-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01002, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OFFICE WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 4) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 4) FOR 8 21 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0227-152-18 and 31 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Assoaates filed an application for Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On Apnl 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No 06-28, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 be approved 3 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 4 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng on April 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 8 21 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Office within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4), and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units and is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), the properties to the south are zoned Industrial Park and are the site of the Aggazzotti home and former winery, a designated point of interest, the property to the east is designated Open Space and is a transmission corridor for Southern California Edison, and the property to the west is developed with various commeraal uses and is zoned Community Commeraal C,~p, E , ~' 9 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-29 DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the surrounding development by providing opportunities for office, hospitality and commercial land uses that will provide support uses and services for the nearby Regionally-Related Commercial Districts located dust east of the project site, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for commeraal, hospitality, food, and office uses to be developed under one land use district utilizing master planning, and e This amendment would not be materially incurious or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, conversely, the amendment will allow for office, retail, hospitality, and food uses to be integrated into a master planned development under one land use district 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a That the subject property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street and the evidence of similar uses existing in the immediate area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing commercial development and commercial activities in the immediate area, and c That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of • Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-29 DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 3 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development DistnctAmendment DRC2005-01002, an amendment to the Development District Map to change approximately 8 21 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue from Office to Community Commercial within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4) as described in the Resolution and shown as Exhibit A of the Draft City Councl Ordinance by adoption of the Draft City Council Ordinance and including the condition shown below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or • employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit C,~p, C~F~15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-29 DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 4 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • ~,a, E, Fq~ . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-01002, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM OFFICE WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 4) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 4) FOR 8 21 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN• 0227-152-18 and 31. A Rentals 1 Charles Joseph Associates fled an application for Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002, as described in the title of this Ordinance Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subtect amendment is referred to as "the application." 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No 06-28, recommending to the City Counal that General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 be approved . 3 Apnl 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this application and recommended approval of this application by the adoption of Resolution No 06-29. 4 On May 17, 2006, the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 06-28, approving the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006. 5 On May 17, 2006, the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 6 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance The City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal dunng the above-referenced public heanng on May 17, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Counal hereby speafically finds as follows: • a The application applies to approximately 8 21 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue and is presently vacant Said C,p~ E,F q~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 Page 2 property is currently designated as Office within the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4), and b. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the surrounding development by providing opportunities for office, hospitality, and commercial land uses that will provide support uses and services for the nearby Regionally-Related Commercial Districts located lust east of the protect site, and c This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for commercial, hospitality, food, and office uses to be developed under one land use district utilizing master planning, and d This amendment would not be materially intunous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; conversely, the amendment will allow for office, retail, hospitality, and food uses to be integrated into a master planned development under one land use district 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Counctl hereby fords and concludes as follows: a The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pollees of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b The proposed amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Development Code and the General Plan, and c The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vienity; and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Councl finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negatroe Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the City Counal; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application • • • ~,~, ~, x'98 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2005-01002 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Councl finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public heanng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Counal hereby approves Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002 to change the Development Distract from Office to Community Commercial within Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 4) for the site identified in this Ordinance, as shown on Exhibit A of this Ordinance and including the condition shown below. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent turisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation 7 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California - ---- ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i_ _ f I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' I ~ ~ ` ' 1 v n 1 - ~ I ~ s ii ' ~ ~ i ~ Regional Related I l ~ Commercial j ~- --- - ' -- -- - - _ _- - I ~~ - ---- - -- -- Open Space ---, ~ i ~,osm. Y~,.~: ~ ,~a~~~: ; ~ OpenSpace ~ i G _ RLC _05.~ ., \~\\\ /° ~ ~ ~ s ~ J. - ~ ~ -_ r--, _ o ! ~ i, ~ ~ .,-'----'4I '.I___cW-:ham a ~~ ~- I ~ `~'^ / i~f' 'S'S' ~ • ; i - -' ___ ~ --i• ' ~ - __ ----- ~_ ___ i -_-,-Cnv P:~71YJL _____ ___-____ e ,>;+ ~ E ~ ~ ! Rai ~ ' ~ - -~ `; .. '~-~ z~ .~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ _ ' Fi I 'L5 - I ~ ~ ~ -. ~ ,, - • / .. Development Distract Amendment ,~% ~ } ,~ DRC2005-01002 ~ ~ ! ___ Exhibit A I i ------- ~-- --- - ' ~ - ' - -- - ~ ~ _ r_'~ - Ordinance W __ ~._~ - Tnt1 -•--- - -- a~~ ,~„ 3~1: W ~[ N O S rF s= ~t~ L• W ~T ~6y $ 5_ Y q: zr ~~ s ~ ~ li I ~a ~ $ .I . Z e y U v s l;,itl !~ ;i, Sll~l'1 . RESOLUTION NO 06-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01003, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17 32 030 OF THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE REGULATIONS WITHIN SUBAREA 4 OFTHE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS TOADD HOTELS, MOTELS, AND MAJOR HOTEL FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES WITHIN MAJOR HOTEL FACILTIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Rentals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2 On Apnl 12, 2006, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment and Development Distnct Amendment applications and issued Resolution No.06-28 and Resolution No. 06-29, respectively, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Development . District Amendment DRC2005-01002 be approved. 3 On the 12th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearng on the application and recommended approval. 4 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows• The application applies to the property located within the City, and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, and c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distract in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the • surrounding development by permitting point development of varying uses already listed in the General Plan including, but not limited to, office, hospitality, food, and commercial land uses that will provide support uses and services for the nearby Regionally-Related Commercial Districts, and C,D,E,Fiol PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-30 DRC2006-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by allowing the innovative use of existing development standards to expand the range of uses within a development protect, and e This amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, materially intunous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor on the surrounding properties, conversely, the amendment will allow for office, retail, hospitality, and food uses to be integrated into amaster-planned development under one land use district, and f The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and obtectives of the Development Code by continwng a policy encouraging quality development through the innovative application of existing design standards 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and • b' This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Development Code, and, • c The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, orwelfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and d The subtect application is consistent with the obtectives the Development Code, and e The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of • Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial C,D,E,F -oa PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-30 DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 • Page 3 Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wtldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 to amend Section 17 32 030 of the Community Commercial Land Use Regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels, and mator hotel faalities as a Conditionally Permitted Use, and cocktail lounges within mator hotel faalities as Conditionally Permitted Use as described in the Resolution and shown as Exhibit A of the Draft City Council Ordinance by adoption of the Draft City Councl Ordinance and including the condition shown below. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ciiy, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or • employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST. Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning • Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit C~p,~, ~io3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-30 DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 4 AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS • • LJ C , ~~~, F lo~- ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2005-01003, A REQUEST TO AMEND SECTION 17 32 030 OF THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE REGULATIONS WITHIN SUBAREA 4 OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTSTO ADD HOTELS, MOTELS, AND MAJOR HOTEL FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES WITHIN MAJOR HOTEL FACILTIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Rentals 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2. On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment Development District Amendment and applications and issued Resolution No 06-28 and Resolution No 06-29, respectively, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and . Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002 be approved 3 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this appbcation and recommended approval by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-30. 4 On May 17, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment applications and issued Resolution No 06-28 and Resolution No 06-29, respectively, approving the assocated General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006 and Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002 5. On May 17, 2006, the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application 6 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct • 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 17, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows• Cfp, E,FIOS CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 Page 2 The application applies to the property located within the City, and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, and c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and wdl provide for development within the district m a manner consistent with the General Plan and with the surrounding development by permitting joint development of varying uses already listed m the General Plan including, but not limited to, office, hospitality, food, and commercial land uses that wdl provide support uses and services for the nearby Regionally-Related Commercial Districts, and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by allowing the innovative use of existing development standards to expand the range of uses within a development project, and e This amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor on the surrounding properties; conversely, the amendment will allow for office, retail, hospitality, and food uses to be integrated into a master planned development under one land use district; and f The proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan and objectroes • of the Development Code by continwng a policy encouraging quality development through the innovative application of existing design standards 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Councl hereby finds and concludes as follows: a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pollees of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code, and, c. The proposed amendment wdl not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the viemty; and The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for • the application, the City Councl finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng C, D, ~, F I~co CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 Page 3 Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: b That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califorma Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the City Council, and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application c Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all sigrnficant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program d. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows. In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative . Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Councl hereby approves Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 to amend Section 17 32 030 of the Community Commeraal Land Use Regulations within Subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts to add hotels, motels, and mator hotel facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use, and cocktail lounges within mator hotel facilities as Conditionally Permitted Use as described in this Ordinance, as shown m attached Exhibit A of this Ordinance and including the condition shown below Plannino Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 5 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent tunsdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such deasion or legislation shall not affect the C , ~p, E , F ion CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2005-01003 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES May 17, 2006 Page 4 validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. • t Cfp~Cfr io8 • HOTEL ~ USES ~ Subarea C i C C On R ~ e [ S C' ubarea Two C ~[ R RH j CJ S C uba O I rea T R J hree S R j~ U, C; ubare C a F R j our 'I~ [ - ~Hote~~Mote~ ^~CI C CC CCCI~ ^ C ^ f~ ~ GC C C C C C ~~ e~s'a ~[~C1 C ~C ~`C~C ~I ~ ~ ~ I~ ~~ C C ~ C ~ JerShtoy~/Barb ~ ~ ~~' J ~I ~~I ~ ~ ~ I J~ ~ IJ~I ; ~ L ! L! ~ 'b)Cafes I JI-J I ,'~LJ _ ~ ~~ _ L-'~~I~'~ ~ ~I -I __ I_~I _I I_I~ _ ~~ ~ _ ~ C ~ Servaic sn9 ~ _ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~C ~ ~ ~ C~~CI ~ ~ ~I ~' C ~~ Ci C C tail~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lo nge LJI _I l I_11-i ! l _J I _1 1J Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003 Exhibit A Ordinance C,p,E, Flog City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000, General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-01002, Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, and Variance DRC2005-01124 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheahove-listed protect. This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom . and when compliance wtll be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be m-place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be avatlable from the City upon request at the following address• City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Department) • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C, D,E, FI-o Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2005-01000, DRC2005-01006, DRC2005-01002, DRC205-01003, SUBTPM17594, DRC2005- 00365, AND DRC2005-01124 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the Cdy staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner. 4. The prolect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The prolect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written • notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9 In those instances requiring long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activties at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an mdiwdual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits C, D,E,FIII MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01000. General Plan Amendment DRC2005-01006. Development District Amendment DRC2005-01002. Development Code Amendment DRC2005-01003. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594, Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00365, and Variance DRC2005-01124 Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger Date: January 17, 2006 .. .. -. -. .. Aesthetics ~ r...i„~. ;~~,ry,>~~t;',` ~~R,"'sr.~~.,• "t ~`~~'~_-`;~~;~ ^ ;"" ,' ~;~',~ :~`_: ~"af;~;~*.~(i~~t )sx , ,~ . - }t„ - ~ 1_ A Photometric diagram shall be submitted and approved CP B Review of Plans C 2,4 pnor to Bwlding Permit issuance demonstrating that illumination from the protect ,s confined within the protect's boundaries and meets the City's foot candle regwrements .l%, t9 ~ F.'+ j. ,.; ._ ,~a,.,j- ~.~,, ;,y AvQuahty ' ~ :;~" ~.~'~~ ' ,~' ' >`.t d4`;,~;~3-„~;, '= ' Ii 't ~;+•Y o~1~3'i..~. ,.,. .;; .o~5 v',6 •~ ^'. 'itzR ~:<,_ a ?:,. k: •, .~~ <t.s,";,J`' ~. A `,'w . _ . . , . _ J ' All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 n operating condition so as to reduce operational em,ssions The contractor shall ensure that all T construction egwpment ,s being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the CPBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 1of10 • T .'- Ci • .. .. • ~. .. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Revew of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound ~ engmeenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means 2of10 .. - .. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCBj) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabtlizers (approved by SCAQMD and 80 C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean 80 C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commeraal facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 regwring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) - All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 'j'} more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas - All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Ail residential and commercial structures shall be BO C!D Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, av conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C Z4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping • 310 • .. .. .. -. -. ., , Cultural Resources ~' ~ - ' ~ ~ , . , _ . ; w. _ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwill retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wtli • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/l) 3/4 sdeg from demolition or sigmOcant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CPBO C Review of report A/~ 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using then special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPBO C Review of report A/0 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report P/~ 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report a0 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Intormation Center for permanent archiving ('' -n _ 4of10 _~ 1~ ~ • -• • . ~. .. • If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Rewew of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate W here mingatwn monitoring is appropriate , the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Rewew of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fosstls with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actrodies • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the frnd • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transferto an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum +,Geolo ~ 'and -i ~.'tr'~~ ~,~;€ ~ ~ ,° ~r ` ~° ~ b ~ ~ 9Y ~~i~J` ~i'i'~~ ~ - .S r g ~g ~ t , ~s ~~"L '- ~•~~ ' ~ x~~ • ,.;~•• *' ~G. 'k~; ,`~ ~I~ ,~• '~~~. ~ ~r ~~'~ ~ ~ 4~ s~ .9~,- ,i~ ~ ~ ~°. ~,,;.~"~;i' ~ ,.~, •-„ - ~.-~, , 3?,"-> r° ~,;,, t - F : , , . _z , : , , a r e c ~5;8 , 74 d,~ :~~, wn"f S`T'. ,w ^«,t ~.i ate, •1''. "~ ,^t.~~~ i~ ~a.~, `F` ~w3~~it~kifh4~J fiS,f y . „~y`- ~°, i The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible • 50~ • m T .~ ~~ i ... .. ... .. . .. .. Frontage publ,c streets shall be swept accord,ng to a BO C Durng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emiss,ons assoc,ated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactroe for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions H drolo' and Water Qtiah'- ~-,+~.z,~r v~~;; $-• >~ • e,.Y: <:~~~.,{ ~ ;~ Y 9Y ty ;- ' ~' ,,,Y. ;: •- . ;~.~+f ..~~a ~l '' " :~ t~'•.'~''-'','?_ ~a ~ ' ~ ~ ~c;.: ; ° , ~: +~ ~..~rt K`.,. ~ , ~ ,,•-;>..: x~ ..:~: .c ,-~.•: ~~ h • -, ~-..- . "~~ Y `•;~:' . i i : s; , - *x _ ,:_~_ -a.:~. rt. ~:c ,..tn.r p~~.F.r. ,ra. h . .~~..,~ ., _ - . w _~§ „, 3h ,k . „ ; _: ~x~ • ~.~ ., _t s. , Prior to issuance of Grading Perm,ts, the perm,t BO B/C/D Revew of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Offic,al for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pian (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction act,vities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 ~ading~lan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies spec,fic measures to control on-site and off-sde erosion from the Ume ground disturbing acpvdies are initiated through completion of grading This~arosion 0ontrol~ilan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specdy the Uming of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced m Southern Cahfomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur ether on-site or off- site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 6 of 10 1J _~ (T1 OQ .. .. -. .. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Associated Engineers, June 9, 2005, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Ponding areas on the south side of the protect are CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 depressed to promote the retention and infiltration of treated runoff and irrigation water Rooftops drain to landscaping prior to entering storm CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 drain system Collection inlets provided with trash guard/grate CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rinker Stormcepter installed to treat water before CE B/C/D Review of plans A!C 2/4 entering infiltration area 7~1 O ~ i • ...- .. ~ ... .. . .: Prior to issuance of Bwlding Permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C y4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Pnor to issuance of ~radmg or ~awng ~ermds, a lica t h ll b ~ BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C y4 pp n s a o tain a t lice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shalt be submitted to the City Bulding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Pe r mit ~~y T Noise`t '. iF. +} ~:.,~n,,T\y9l:.~n ti. a<.yr4 {{~ ~ 41 M~.YY ] ry ,<r " c A H yy . ,;W ~~ 7 3 ;,~` i.4~ifr •`~ "7 ~. 1 ,i`~ ' ~~~~ ...~ ~ - iCJ' IwW~r •{Sf`A' } ,.'~ -4 .. ~ 4 ..l__ . Pt h" :'~t ° ~' ~/}~~++ kV i" JY 12,~_-. '` 4`4 i ?~: ( ~~ w~}~i. }.Z'.. `5:~ ~"3 ,y, _ ~di:. u.' #"' r ~ :: ".~''' tl <- .t S 'S ~ ., ~k:..', "''{': .. rn ; ,l - . - ~ , .: . ~f.. . n .3i ~ _ x, .J~:_. 4`~:5. nKr r ... s y a fl ~Y.~! i.. Pi ~ ~ a, hrf Exterior An 8-foot high masonry wall shall be CP B/C/D Review of plans A C 2,4 ~) constructed along the north property Ime in order to d , provi e a sound attenuation and privacy between the -_ single-family dwelling units to the north and the protect. _Inte All south facing windows and glass doors in the CP B/C/D Review of plans A C 2,4 hotel bulding shall have an STC rating of 32 or greater , A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City CP B Review of plans A,C 2,4 Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40 dBA for the hotel rooms, the building materials and construction techniques regwred The budding plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 8 of 10 _d m ... -. .. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 2,4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards speafied m Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hue a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be requved by the Bwldmg Official Said consultant shall report then findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shal4 be constructed as early CP C During A 2,4 as possible in fast phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POGO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, d heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 datly trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shalt denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings • ~'~ i Key to Checklist Abbreviations ,Responsible Person.~'•~~~~~:. ~~r"~~~SS"t~~~a~; ~.~.'k', .. p.n ,.~.;~ aY^ • ~. SIN"nito In ire' uenc "~'~ f:. 4 9; 4 ~. Y;a ~"~ '"Method of<Verlflcation~c~''"~,»~~~r . ~ `~` # q ~°` eSanctions '• '• ~ ~ "` ~ ' "• i' CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee .r .,... . -... . A -With Each New Development , ~ ,_., .c >+. __-~.... ,...r. . ;. ,~.,- A - On-site Inspection y - ,_ _ w ., : 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/flans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation V /~ rT 10 of 10 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C II O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner, MPA SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 - PENNINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to subdivide 4 78 acres of land into 5 parcels in the Regional Related Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway - APN 0229-021-58 Related Fdes Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00256 and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to develop a shopping center totaling 28,961 square feet including a bar for the EI Torito restaurant on 4 78 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway - APN 0229-021-58 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 and Preliminary Review DDRC2005-00020 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA gwdelines Section 15301 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A S_urrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Victoria Gardens Route 66 Area, Mixed UseNictoria Community Plan South - I-15 Freeway East - I-15 Freeway West - Foothill Crossing Center (Sears Grand), Regional Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C) B General Plan Designations Protect Site - General Commeraal North - Mixed Use South - I-15 Freeway East - I-15 Freeway West- - General Commeraal ITEM G & H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17077 AND DRC2005-00256 April 12, 2006 Page 2 C Site Characteristics: The project site is the last undeveloped parcel at the I-15 Freeway and the Foothill Boulevard interchange; hence, represents an opporturnty to provide a high quality gateway into Rancho Cucamonga The site is in an area of significant freeway and regionally related commercial activity To the north is the Victoria Arbors Lifestyle Center, and to the west is the Foothill Crossing (Sears Grand) shopping center The I-15 Freeway lies along the south and east boundaries. The site is easily visible by motorists traveling south, therefore, offering an opportunity to present a positive development impact on the community There are no mature trees on the vacant portion of the subject site D Parking All proposed parcels would be developed with regwred parking for their associated bwldings There is enough parking for each parcel and approved land use There will also be reciprocal vehicular access between all of the parcels The total required parking for the project is 252 stalls with a total of 261 proposed parking stalls. ANALYSIS A. General This is an infiil project which continues the pattern of the surrounding commercial development characterized by freestanding pad bwldings for restaurants, banks, and retailers. The proposed project is planned for five stand-alone bwldings, which total 28,961 square feet and breaks down as follows two in-line retail/restaurant buildings at 15,150 square feet, EI Torito restaurant (including a bar) at 7,166 square feet, a 4,000 square foot bank, and a 2,645 square foot EI Pollo Loco drive-thru fast food restaurant The main on-site access to the site is via the primary adjoining access of the Foothill Crossing shopping center. The Foothill Crossing center Site Plan was master planned to accommodate this proposed development, such as a shared driveway access to Foothill Boulevard B Parcel Mao The land division is for financing purposes and is in conformance with City regulations. In conjunction with the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a Tentative Parcel Map division to subdivide the 4.78 acres into 5 parcels The Development Code exempts the project from the minimum parcel size requirements because it is a master planned development. C Project Design Ail of the bwldings, except for the EI Torito restaurant, are designed to match the existing Foothill Crossing project and create a flwd transition of the architecture The EI Tonto restaurant elevation is a "signature" design that reflects the festive identity that is common with the EI Torito developments. The other proposed buildings have strong vertical and horizontal interplay along the facades There is also ledge/stackstone on certain features of the buildings that are not on the Foothill Crossing center project. The site location is designated as a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" by the Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan, therefore, will regwre special design treatment within the parkway and street itself D Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and Conceptual Landscaping Plans on February 14, 2006, and, the applicant addressed all of the secondary issues of the project The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) recommended approval subject to design recommendations The G,N-Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17077 AND DRC2005-00256 Apnl 12, 2006 Page 3 Committee complimented the applicant on their design A condition of approval incorporating the Committee's recommendations has been included in the proposed Resolution of Approval E Grading Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on February 14, 2006 The Committee recommended approval F Environmental Assessment This project is categoncally exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15315 and 15332 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 and Development Review DRC2005-00256 through adoption of the attached Re~lution of Approv~dh Conditions i Dan Gete~an Acting Cdy Planner , DC DF/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Grading Plan Exhibit D - Bwlding Elevations Exhibit E - Landscape Plan Exhibit F - Design Review Comments dated February 14 2006 Exhibit G - Suburban Parkway Enhancement Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Draft Resol ution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 Draft Resol ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00256 C,, I~- `~ h~~ :G :~~ ~Q Iy ~~ ~-' ~A T 1 ~Y~n ~~~ ' - ~ - .~o3L~~ ~ .w..ao ~~ LLw ,Na,E wl - ,-- - -- ~- ~---,~-w ---- --- _J-__f- _-_ -'~. -__~__ r~ ~--L ~ . _ - _~ ~___Jf__ O ~ / . I l ~o T o_-=_9 _ O J `\ FI I ~ Or/nce .O ~ J ~n `~~~o o ~ ___ - _~ Tr l T O ~ I " ./ ~ ~~ ~ +~ I O , / I ~ - L. ..ca e ~ ~.o a ~ ~~~~ ~a d ~'~~rp I / ~ y `: {• .~/ / as +° ` NO~ ~ I /AN / ~ F F`q / AAx~ _ L _ I~ / / t / / ~v~ I Aa/ /. /~, g~ ~ re s r~ - 1~`x: Yei 'I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 17077 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. a~NC . a~ m iN~ Nwmks W o ssaiax a Iowa«Y ~M N 6 R51 '~ 6ePm~NO WNgw x M( WN~Y IX e~NNUmNO n.rt fnOfM[nI. .v N +u ~.. ~.. rr..+ro++o rniw~..~m. nn. .+ ~ m.,~,~~w. ~m ~.,,... ., .~.>.m LLVeL~oea<eerax. o ^ ' M1 e,rt ' a ~-+ Lfafnv / / ' V.,,... ,. vfxcxprnn¢ Di« a~~~l...x .r.m~ aAns en Efenxa¢ i ~~~a i i I ~~ TYPICAL $E~iION FOOTHILL BOULE VAPD VIW~Y PMR YPo+o•,.,..nN. o+.+ wi. o. Wert-..e.. ..~.. ~ x+,. +«~.,. ,., :xnYnveuevee/nreueem G'I+M.EN9+.Nffn VYwe~i MAP CLnllf~9 +f.,v V + YIGWIY MAY ~~ !f xrt i ! f • . • i ' ~4 •~\~NL I~'y__il 'li ~ .. _~•; ,q, /1,i 'o-, Ual~Hr~i nn~1~_~jl, ~t „„ \ ~~ .,.. ,~ ~~ .A-r.-" ._ k._ ~, r' i 41 I ~ ray `~ ~_~I_____.___. ,~ PI F45E IIOIE ti._. ~I t ~- ___ . I, i1i -rHFinc.E Ol DLVARIURL ,a ID I -- -, - - _ . ,~.._.._ ~._ 1 1 APPROAGM 6HAII lIOi F%CFFD9 DEGREES ~ ` +~ r7 i i ~ ~+ ~~ cvll._ 1,11 DR 10P6 ~ SX(1'!$ Rf$I~IPPNIS ESiPIIPP11t$ ~ / ~ ~ i li^ - F$ $HOVIN ON IHE SITE PLAN A MAUMUAI \ \ B I U s=i ~ SF 1 gsB SV I ~ L 70RIT 11 - IPSIDETURLINGHADIUSOF2DANDA ~~~ ~. +~ ~ ~~~ ~- ~+~ ]1685F ~ ~{~~ II ___ A'INIMUM OUTSIDE TURNING RADIUS OF a6 IS \ \ l~~;iT REOIRED AT ALL RIE FIRE LANE TURNS ~ \ ~ I I I I•I_I.11JY~~ Q ~JYi-m-rrrrn) ' I I 1 LI I+1 I I III 41J=1 ( I E ~ I I `• ~" i PROJECT SUMMARY ~ ~ II BSi~K ~,v .~,°~. KI~~.1~1 ~ \~ WJllllJl111J 4ao.~F ~ml:a: ..IR,. ~~~i)ffiS , ~~{~41~117~1 ~I~ n - W SI ~ , r i,-, asp ~~~~R,. ~g ~\ i I o p I i ~'NUwa Ne.a,awwanoaw w+•ai asr +\ 'oqF~ ~.\ ~~~}~~ ~TIITTiTf1TL ""1 m ••_••• -~ .rv.narunin 9L \ ° 1 _ o xiu enewEmnli'Sq nsltis \. _____ _ T 0.5IUPx.'IT IH ~~Si MSI45 rye n 5luµrrlflNieYU9 ~nOl Ntl~l6V ~ry51 e~n41 \ ~ •\ i~ i V UM rMi1,/rM YSr..is i i LL wvowwml iml ena `I x vwam°.un xn4s ~ / °'..: ~ \~,~e~ NDRNE-THRU 1 ~ ~ '_'°~ ~ ~ 2 645 SF as ~ __ .,.... I ,d:.T o-'~n ~ ~~\ FREEjyq ~~ b I I Y +,_ ~ , ' ~ -_ ,~ ~~ J two \ I = ~- . FOOTHILL BWLEVFBD \ I !-~%,"-, "~- -" ~~m ~ HIV _\_ _ I - SWC I-15 AND FOOTHILL BAVpIDUg55.6M119°I ~`""''° SITE PLAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 33,I,R°H3~E onc3aosamx 0 3B eo egeo svarrun°n Plerc~olBY ~~ SCHEME P PENINSULA RETAIL DEVELOPMENT G ' .IS 39TH SIPEET "c a Inc NEWPOPT BE/.CH CMIEORNIA93IAl ... a : - F9'3J99W _ ._°_ ^AFGIIfECIIAiE i I nPP,,.LMw CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN _ ~ _ _ ~"_`_ _ i• FOR ~ ~-~.,. e._ r.>< ~ L~ 6_~ ---F~• -w'~ -- -- -TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 17077 .--j i , r T -_ R,°'~t _'~'In==,~ •~-' -"~"'_' ~ :~-~~ _ xti r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~C COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - I lri s"° "~ ~ pqa oiaiaR ^lL ail „Ca / ~\..._umce.M,e STATE OF CALIFORNIA \ ' I II ,~,.. .. . I H'x^ I ~ "iaR ~ ~ o,x¢L/wwlranr.rrucu,r L-arNP - _^ _ ~ nil, R ~ ~ Liz I ( ~.~iR I' .i. nl p,~ ~ _ { 5 1{i," nn eecl,rtu .~..., -., ,. NIHR I' I U~ O NPR/ AMP .m ,.w. ~°' ,. MY.. ..,.~ a ~ O I O ien ° /ixi uanL LCLSnrno6 h,xa ~i ~ o F iai ~.~. , '.,, u.,e o. cx.wx • ,pi,R ,u ~ T O R{IR l/ IR"aR ~~~ ~.,~., - ~""• ~ ~°~ • neeneaenaeL I ~ ~ F'~Ini~,a .. '~ RiR~~i ~ ,. w.. _.~, BaR ua„ Pia ^ o '„„~,~ .. m,;..~: e~~~ , 6 `I ° is !~5 t - --.,T~---i~-- A~,'~ ,.; ,,, o.,_~, ~ - I - O ////^^ /fV ~V n`V~~ ,IV lLm4M M.ehiu , ~~ ~ eem ox. ~.A..~ ~~~~ ~ d ~ I ^ '= kYR- ~ / •! S_ ~ !'~ _ I •~ a+m e[ eumxae _, ' Mcno F II e 'y e~~Q\ EenreNam~ w•xnnn nsnn B.V ~ ", I I / r /t+.vS E ,i,T i I\ ~ ® n[.u[e er BIrE INPNO VEMENT PL1X9 TroiC XL BECPOn _ _ _ __ _ {' 7 I-,e s.xao vnoxi uc worHlu BouLEV"eo _ _ __ __ _ ~ "T. p>"~~. ~a. __ ' a ^~ ~ ~"'°^'~ ~_. m _::_. r. _.... .._ N/,MCHO CUC~MONW CA .Ix Inm • • • • • rv • • t _ a„ ~ _ - ' ~ ~S o ~ ~=-- -` ~ -- Y~ •z i~ i r! - i ~ _ _ i`~ f~ - 1 < _ 4 i (-! - Y III F M1 H A ~ ~cr f ' `~ ,~~ . ~ _~ =~ ~ ~ - _- b ° =- .~ ~ ~ ~- ' ~ ~- r . \~Ci r ~ r •` r , ~~, ~ ,\ ,e ~~r~ . ~~ © ~,- 4 ~~~ -V I ~ fJ • s- - ~~~ l _ _ I Ic ~'-?'~ ~ i ~ - - ~ - - ~- ° i - - - r, _ n J __ f - ~ L _ - .- J l ___~ ~^ - Ei -_, _~ - 4 Y 4 ~;;1~ . -- ^- V•,1 1 Y zy• ~bt; ~_a ~ ®~ 8~ ~:.~ - ,- .~ , e_ UJ ~lRU' I L ~'~l'~,'~l ~ S 4 a..?R .. ~.. EAST ELEVAT ON r ~ . ~ ~~ .} jt'9' f _~ I WEST EI EYATION E\IERIOR EIFVAIIONS ~ ., .. , ' ~ l;~lL ln. ~ , v~r~ SOUTH EIEV gT10N NORTH ELEVATION • ' - ~ ~I, rl ,t -' I ' r _ • ~. _ ~ . ,,- ^.r-v 1 ~ J ' Y;- 1 ~~ ,s `. ~_l~ aio iM~~m. d(~I ~ _ . I l_.J - L 7 _ ~' Q 4 s 1~ ~, ~' t Y _~~_ ~ ~ _ n .~~ •~ W =G. sf . ~~~: ~~ {~ ~,~ '~~ S`r ~~ rtY )tt'i .~i J Y.r ~i Y'f~. :~ .Jv F` G,~-°~ J J ~ z W F" v a OQ ~_ Iwo LL. o c="` Da d"~~ Zc~ F.~~ m U p ..a. Q c ~~m° IAx ¢-z rv j o 1 2 ~ IA W ~ ~ Z t U z 3 ~W a N W W O H N J W O Q_ Q N Z W D W ~_ F KEY PLAN y Z g~ 4 I Y t' •F~ c ~ Y, j e G~ ~lj~ 11~ I ~I~ 1 ---^~ A THREE DIMENSIONAL MODEL STUDIES I~ /~'~ Y~ u' 1 I ~ L 'IQ'~('L I \' ,I I,In6 . V I L I s ' `Ya Ir., 1. 9 ,~8, Q~- ~^ j ~ ,} , I ti ;~"~ "Fr,hm ~ .~ 4' ~N ~, - sty,t'.~~~;t ~. , u ~ , ~:;,yr I n ~1~...~ k~{; s]~ C,i . ~~ In .. ~ , Z~ ~.! ~i f~ft. ~I~sS"~'1rilS`:rii ~"" .,r ley _ C B SWC I-15 AND FOOTHILL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA PENINSULA RETAIL DEVELOPMENT <13 fBTN STREET NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 9166] 9dB )]] 9300 • ~e W E6T ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATON 4 ` NORTH ELEVA710N ` ~ ` °'"I~ ~• - ":+ ~~u~~~ ?T "-~• i. [ABT 0.lVATH]N ~ ' u" c, ~ t<< (. • 8011TH 0.EVATION ` •• a` ATM ~ - ~, ~ __ ~_ ~;~ ~ BANK/ATM SWC I-15 AND FOOTHILL SHOPS/RESTAURANT 6 BANK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ~i ~i, ~_ PENINSULA RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 116 38TH 6TREET GOJIPp NEW PORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 93883 918 ]3] 9500 ii ®'~'~It I~~i EAST 0.EVAT10N ^ ~ -' L _ Y SHOPS/RESTAURANT EA6T ELEVATONB ~ ~ SIGN _ I ` 3 ~ ~ _, ~~. _ .. ~.' ~ '-__ wr SIGN SIGN SIGN ~ w „v t.^l _ ~'.`°.° bIGN SIGN .~ ,• -SIGN ~j ES+it~ byf% Ib',' Ir• l N NORTI lILVATION WE6T ELEVATIONS u ®- ;_I: ~. n~ } _ SIGN .-~ :~ SWC I-15 AND FOOTHILL SHOPS/RESTAURANT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PENINSULA RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ~' ' 415 t9TN BTREET C-o CIE NEWPORT BEACN CALIFORNIA 9]663 949 T23 9500 __ ® ~ "r, • 60UTN ELEVATNIN wo - ~- N a +~.-_ Q,o-v_ ~'ni~-__ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION n. suEE Ve' = I -o Q Q i i 0a,.> ~,.a..,. 0 0nr< B~T- - - ?~-~- FRONT (FOOTHILL BLVD ) z E~ LEVATION nd SL0.E I/8' = I -G' Q 4 i i •i i i i i Q i FINISH LEGEND Ou rv e~vu Qi 0' ow~se v~ 0 ~~ ~ ~.s®~ :: 1i'41ip~`i~ a(I~iii6n r~'iE ~` I<.I)I: ~a i~ ~kpxp' 9~ i •3 "s a~ x ~i9 R! O~g ~6 gg 8£~I A4 4 4 ~ 4 ~ 4 1~ ty1 ~~~~tIF! '~~~°.i [i!!i91iE REAR ELEVATION a5 SCALE I/O ~ ~ -0 4~ ~~ ~= ~ ~ a .3 ~! ~a a s% I:i FlNISH LEGEND ~1 ~m@.~wu ~.W. \V Oi vm nun u.r. 6 '4 I g 1 Oi ~ ~~ "^^ wee ' 0 O ~ ~ 3 O:d. U ~ °sa O ura maam min ~ OQt 8$°P d~~~ A5 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION AS SCALE i/B 1 -0 u • __ _ $_. n s 5 ~ a_ ~: w qz 6 MY _ O, _ _.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ Vl - ~~ _ y~- ~~~~. ~ r ,. ~.•'' -_ J P _~`~1 ~•1` .-+i. s ~ ~~ -~~- ~, ~ ' > C'3 a ~ ' :'~ - ~ ~~ ^^ Z v a ",~ _~,n -- ~, ~ Q ' ~ ` o Nf sw~ ~ ~ J ~~'~P rra ~ ~>~ ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~~~~l a z z ~ z ~:, ~, ~` 9 .~ Q ~ z ~• ~ : Y ~ a .~~- - F t i 0 " ° } v 36~ ~~s ' ~~~~rr ~ Q. U 2 ~ _ }8 + F - G :i S 3-~ d ~~ ~ : r i ~3*3 f ~ t :a. ~ b Yt2 5 yaS Y k ;: 1 z 455 ~ O d ~ ~' i ~ •5] t ~ t~ Q i " ii' Y i Sri ~' ~£c r scjc ~x~ ~ £ .z?b , ; ~ " W Gs1~ -~5 . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Doug Fenn February 14, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 - PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to subdivide 4 58 acres of land into 5 parcels in the Regional Related Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN 0229-021-58 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00256 and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 - PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC - A request to develop a shopping center totaling 28,961 square feet including a bar for the EI Tonto restaurant on 4 78 acres of land in the Regional Related Commercial District, located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN 0229-021-58 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 Desion Parameters The pro/ect site is the last undeveloped parcel at the I-15 Freeway/Foothill Boulevard interchange, hence, represents an opportunity to prowde a high quality gateway into Rancho Cucamonga The site is in an area of sigrnficant Freeway and Regionally related . commercial activity To the south is the Victoria Arbors mall, and to the west is the Foothill Crossing shopping center The I-15 Freeway lies along the south and east boundaries The site is easily visible by motorist traveling south because the site lies below the roadway level, therefore, offering an opportunity to present a positive development impact of the community The land division is for finanang purposes and is in conformance with City regulations The property is designated as a "Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area" by the Foothill Boulevard-Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan because of its location at a mator gateway into Rancho Cucamonga The need for speaal design treatment is noted on the Landscape Plan The protect is an infill project and continues the pattern of surrounding commercal development characterized by freestanding pad bwldings for restaurants, banks, and retailers The proposed protect is planned for five stand-alone buildings which total 28,961 square feet and breaks down as follows two in-line retail/restaurant buildings at 15,150 square feet, EI Tonto restaurant (including a bar) at 7,166 square feet, a 4,000 square foot bank, and a 2,645 square foot EI Pollo Loco drive-thru fast food restaurant The main on-site access to the site is via the primary adtoining access of the Foothill Crossing shopping center The Foothill Crossing center Site Plan was master planned to accommodate this proposed development, such as a shared driveway access to Foothill Boulevard All of the bwldings (except for the EI Torito restaurant) are designed to match the existing Foothill Crossing protect and create a fluid transition of the architecture The EI Torito restaurant elevation is a "signature" design that reflects the festive identity that is common with the EI Tonto developments The other proposed bwldings are concrete tilt-ups with strong • vertical and horizontal interplay along the facades There is also ledge/stackstone on certain features on the bwldings that are not on the Foothill Crossing center protect DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17077 AND DRC2005-00256 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC February 14, 2006 . Page 2 Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues None The applicant has done a good tob of addressing many of staffs earlier development concerns such as orienting the front of the EI Torito restaurant towards Foothill Boulevard and providing a pedestrian access from Foothill Boulevard to the store front, relocating trash enclosures from faang mayor on-site drive aisles, enhancement to building elevations, additional landscape, and a landscape median in the primary access to the project site Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 All of the buldings, except for the EI Torito restaurant building, need additional stone work on ali side of the buildings 2 The proposed colors of all of the buildings, except for the EI Torito restaurant building, should match the existing color theme of the Foothill Crossings shopping center This will help strengthen the transitional continwty between the two projects 3 The proposed "Manchester Tan" on the EI Torito restaurant building does not work well • with the other vibrant colors and should be deleted 4 On the dome roof, elements that are proposed to be covered with the small mosaic reflective file chips should be replaced with a more subtle and less shiny color (r+.on-metallic looking) 5 Decorative paving needs to be installed at the shared access driveway fronting Foothill Boulevard between this protect and the Foothill Crossing shopping center Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion 1 Trash receptacles must be decorative with trellis to match the architecture of the protect 2 Outdoor dining patio of the EI Torito restaurant that will be affected by traffic on Foothill Boulevard will need sound attenuation barriers, such as Lexan panels 3 Avoid expanses of blank walls, devoid of any articulation or embellishments 4 Screen drive-thru lanes from public view by orienting the building and a combination of landscaping, berming, and low screen walls Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the protect is revised per the above recommendations and return to the Design Review Committee as a full item • n ~ ~'~ - `~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17077 AND DRC2005-00256 -PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC • February 14, 2006 Page 3 Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant presented revised plans addressing staff recommendations The Committee recommended approval of the protect ~J ~J Cs,~~-1~ ~ -- - - -- ~ Foatliill f3oubeuurrl - f listoric t~oute fib ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I I`ICI InE II L.l I1C5 -~~ $UIt11Nl{\x l'\HN\\\1111\`111/111 ANIA 1'NI ^Itlll'I In~Lillld~t .ll ll 11 lea fl.ll cl\' \~ \~ J t I~ Sl lbatk mllh Sutw'ak Trc cc \ \ g u p dntl lull IMut Ibl) ~ ~~ t `~ l ,l .III I,~Idlr~ ~Ilil pnlvn •h l i.. 3' II I ~lunud•nhll II pmllnp lm. l"II• >pl ua Al cc nl Pdung Alalena to \ ~ tl .II..I ,..I I IVdiJI lhl .I Il, lp ~ a Il ,lnl. toll LII nnl u Malch the Color nl the EVShn~ \\ a II' ,II II, aldtvt Jk I i Idlh L, I , b lyah III Cont. rrte Bllt k Pavue J I \ w J ILA Inv tll In l , uJnn d l.,l 1, I. l~ I,I III Il l ldllu I , 11 I It('n1111 ~ IIIII I , II 111\f1 I 1 I, II I',III ,~ Fnuk fib Lugn lntpnnltd lniOlhC 1 ~ O I Enhawlnum.nL. JAI nlLl h. Irlllvl•111,1 AIUIdU nI IhI IIdVrnlrnl- ~~~`~ ~ plulnu nl nl mrn 111 lmnd .n IN dll lldl l ogle hh IIleS m lree \Nrlls Sit a od at 19' on Cl~nlel - 1 1r t r m Nnr 6 Banding 1 I I b`Inn~ Pncl and Cablc I I:u uh. a~ SatU\ Barnrr I~ I'I nlnlt ni nl Sprc In J i .\r nt rnk/Llln q r,. nt i,- ~~Llllln Bntk Pallem SR is f nnurlo Pavuc In Aledlan In AI tll h I slclm~ Pd\Ur5 I I yeuvk J sldl walk Arras Could 81 t'hlvul lur Pacrmtnl of I Nrna¢ Murals or 51a1e Decnl a I IBntulk Inlays I .\. I r nt (Dion tl l:nnt rt.lt it 1 ~~ 1vI`hnl; Mrdlan Landsotping Ji'I il`~Y 4, r. r` .y.' ' 1 w' y ` ~ k." . ' ' ' ` ~ ., Y;, r~F .E~rt L ` 4.r t '.; 'kii ~`:,~1•~. ~.et ~~ t~ arF .. '. ~,J,tr; _. h:„\„n.,.4~.sk F'Y, •l .. (W '' ' ti ~ t ,r 'p~ N~1. ;i14 Nd ^E;j w ~~ " •~ , v^' Y, ' ,. )5 ~T, fr S ^ s F r t s.e 1 ~' . F) S•v 'i11 '~ ' „ ;j ; t ., ~ i ~ d ~ t~~ . rykF,i; N v ff ; : , , d6F,. lufi`A'. h , -, \ ,_, .,,, SLL.I~ x~a ,v , , is /~ ~ • ~\~,fh t .~~"f;-~J t~ ~ ' ~~. ~ < ~' ;arr: `4~ i: ea}.~.,S ~t Tw+'r ' . c; `C ~ < r'~~; ~~ s,s` S.~ ;'F ) ~ . x. il ' ' "^ 't l ,.~.,~.tiNt.:.,~Mn#:,inSe2 ip~•r,}iF f. k' tl • 0.a L:~ -vy: -I{~ll.'gl !``'-'. a d '~• ~!~' h(y` ,.~ i~y~C'.l-`fi r { k t .ti ti' f4 5 ~ ,l t .a 7rv t'I~ •i" : A ~f ~~th~h 1J J ~' .e £~% i {a'~ L t fair i;1~+z..ui°.7t~'".t...~.`..§±~';'E~'x..~.a 4'I`d S. t / J fl `S\` `l,S Yu.^ :,,.., ri, '.x :'.`d]s"r _'_ia.' •Iil plul 11. of llhlrl dl III Illnl II IVI , n,l llh . sponJ I Illpl up I III ulll 161~m1 ICI, IIq.I ~ ' Impnne J nro. tll~ Inl v O 7 Ir•Rl p u' Ilr 1111111 rn lhl Inl Jl111 nl ,lrv l~I la allh a:~ I,. Ill n.h lh~ I~Lllnll bmAp.IWn aIn Il,u 1, e l ' l ln„ pa\r n I Ilu I dl n 1'I I. III„ II. III lol.,,l41 n lvu mllu Inn 11111 u an LL a & © +}k .~ F< : t •t . y f\~ ~ = I . , ~ a . a r II I Exlsl ul MI III In q C xISIInG I and~l .Il u`d 1'.u k\\ 1\ Sclbaek \\'Iih tildt \valk ire I c and Turf lh1m Ib'1 .. ~% ,- _, -. . ENhIbItR vn+ul wxe-r, I ~ ~ f"oofhill F3ouleNard - Nisfur~oufe Gc5 SUBURBAN PARK WAI ENHANCEMENT AREA PROTOTYPE __ _ _ _ _ _ u ~ - Ci apr hh n k< m Tree \Nrll. ~ - Plat emenl of Spec gal Crape ,.\h ales m UPr \~Vell. ~~ ~ Spau•d al 15' on Cc ntnr I ArhvniL /icon $pau d at 15' on Q nir r J I \ Arian Gdored Cnnrrc•IC j Acccm Cnlnrcd Cnncrclc~ i I~ Placement rn Spcual , ~ Placement of Speual I I~ ~ ArlworL /Icon ~ +~-,- T Iy:' ArhvorL /Imo r. a, ~, s ~ ~~x~~p y _ ~Ihgnnc Poq and Gbfe lHi<hme Pnst and Cable s_ ~~~ ~~•~_~ J ~ Roadway $alcn 9anu r Noadwn) Salety Rarncr~ ~ i • ~ Br nch (~ ~y~r• ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'c_ ~~ i Bonih • - ` ~ _.. .~ t~ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ' ~~` FOOTHILL BOULCVARD •, L~~ r 1~ '~ IG'ALninmm G¢bn~Travel Lams Fxigmg Median Existing Travel Lands ifi'Munnuim •• r ,~. .. Exhibits u~an Foothill soulevarcl - Historic Route bb Suburban Parkway Enhancement Area Streelscape Sfmulatlon 1 i a'b?' . -. NOTE Th¢ sculpwial anworW¢ons shown in phis visual simulation are for illusvaeve Wgsoses only After Iln(nn• Exhibit T • i ~ • RESOLUTION NO 06-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 4 78 ACRES OF LAND INTO 5 PARCELS IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 1-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0229-021-58 A Recitals 1 Peninsula Retail Partners, LLC filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the above-described map and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The subject property is within the Regional Related Commercial District, and b The application is in contunction with the development of a commercial retail center, and c The application proposes to subdivide the 4 58-acre property into 5 parcels 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b That the design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistentwith the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and . c That the site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and (~,, H " 22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-31 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 April 12, 2006 • Page 2 d That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e That the Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f That the design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision g The proposal is compatible with the objective, policies, elements, and program specified in the General Plan, and The design or improvement of the project is consistent with applicable General Plan, 4 This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA gwdelmes Section 15301 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference • Engineering Deoartment 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be improved in accordance with Caltrans and City "Mator Divided Highway" standards as required including, but not limited to • Curb and gutters, sidewalk, driveway, and streetlights to loin existing as required • Foothill Boulevard shall have four through lanes in each direction from Day Creek Boulevard to the I-15 Freeway (14 feet adjacent to the median, 12 foot, 12, foot, 17-foot right-turn lane) 2) Protect and/or provide additional traffic striping and signage as requred, including R26(s) "No Stopping" signs 3) Development shall take access to Foothill Boulevard at a shared use driveway located on the westerly property line No additional driveways will be allowed 4) Reciprocal access shall be provided from all lots to Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards 5) The developer shall grant approval for sharing the common drive aisle • to the developer of the protect to the west G,i-1 - 23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-31 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 April 12, 2006 Page 3 6) The developer shall loin the newly formed CFD 01-01 and pay the necessary fair share portion, including interest (Resolution 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) pnor to recordation of the final map The fee amount for the anniversary date 03/01/06 is $175,382 21 The actual fee will be determined at the time of recordation 7) The developer shall also loin the newly formed CFD 2003-01 and pay the necessary fair share portion, including interest (Resolution 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) prior to the recordation of the final map The fee amount for the anniversary date 03/01/06 is $529,613 OS The actual fee will be determined at the time of recordation 8) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan and on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check . 9) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid to the Construction and Demolition Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Budding and Safety Department Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect 10) The developer shall offer all newly constructed electrical distribution facilities for dedication to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility and requiring all such developments to be served electrical service by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility The developer shall enter into a distribution line extension agreement with the City pnor to the request for electrical service 11) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Suburban Parkway Enhancement area 12) All utilities off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite side of the streets fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance with the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be undergrounded with the policy 13) An on-site drainage study will be required and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer pnor to final map approval or issuance of Budding Permits, whichever occurs first G, ~+ -2y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-31 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 April 12, 2006 Page 4 14) The developer shall dedicate the right-of-way for future freeway improvements The developer shall landscape this right-of-way The landscape is temporary until the ramp is constructed This area shall be designed as a separate system to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 15) Obtain approval from Caltrans as it relates to drainage along the future freeway improvements and/or final right-of-way requirements The Grading Plan indicates a slope and drainage onto orwithin the ultimate Caltrans right-of-way Provide a letterfor acceptance from Caltrans or re-grade the site to eliminate the drainage onto their easement 16) Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City covering the estimated cost of operating all the streetlights during the first 6 months of operation, prior to Building Permit issuance 17) A signed consent and waiver form to /oin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of Bwlding Permits, whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17077 SUBJECT: RETAIL CENTER/LAND DIVISION APPLICANT: PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF I-15 FREEWAY AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; APN• 0229-021-58 __ ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Tentatroe Parcel Map SUBTPM17077 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Perrmit DRC2005-00256. B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fde in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Footh~il Boulevard - Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan C~ Completion Date ~-/_ ~-/- ~-/. G , N - 2l~ Protect No SUBTPM17077 Completion Date 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, ed d ivision, or approv bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot sub use has commenced, whichever comes first 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwiding permit issuance APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFTEY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: D. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. ~ / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, wrth ~J_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. E. Windows d t ff t d / / ra ic rians an es 1 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pe - - 2 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede _/~_ entry to burglars 3 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or _/~_ prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. F. Building Numbering 1 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be ~_/ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. G. Alarm Systems 1 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriff's dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _/~_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-1-OS 2 (~~E}'2~ Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Building & Safety COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS L~ December 7, 2005 I-15 Rancho Pacific, LLC S/S Foothill Blvd, W/S I-15 SUBTPM17077 & DRC2005-00256 NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1 Prowde compliance with the Californa Bwidmg Code (CBC) for property Ime clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 & 39. 3 Prowde compliance with the California Bwlding Code for required occupancy separations 4 Prowde draft stops m attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requued fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6. Openings m exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 7 Provide the required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29. 8 All exit components must comply with the requrements of CBC Chapter 10 (adjoining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc.) 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be required 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans B. General Requirements Submit five conceptual sets of plans including the following Bt, l+ - 2$ Page 1 of 3 a Site/Plot Plan b Floor Plan . c. Foundation Plan d Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. g. Planning Diwsion Tracking Number (i e ,DRC, SUBTT, SUBTPM etc) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls C. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnor to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. . 4 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Bwlding and Safety Diwsion Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i a ,DRC, SUBTT, SUBTPM etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance 3 The Bwlding and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m. • Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (avatlable at the Planning Division's public counter) ~,ff -z°~ Page 2 of 3 D. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of Califorrna to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional regwrements may be regwred 5 The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Budding and Safety Official pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits. 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califorrna registered Civil Engineer. Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be . approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Division if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710 • G,1~ - 30 Page 3 of 3 ,u„~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection - District ~- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS December 14, 2005 Peninsula Retail Partners, LLC 12401 Foothill Blvd SUBTPM17077 & DRC2005-00256 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be accessed on the web at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fve/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article (the preceding number of the standard refers to the article) Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear with the corresponding standard, make your selection FSC-1 Public and Pnvate Water Supply i 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants (also reference RCFPD standard 9-8): a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. Fue hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections ui On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As requred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwlding c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the extensor of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required . fire flow shall be provided d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof. G,~-~ -~1 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this protect is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual . pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station morntonng This regwrement is made in accordance with the Califorrna Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fue hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District rewew and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4 Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection underground water plans are approved for all protects that must extend the existing fire protection water supply to or onto the site 5 On all site plans to be submitted for rewew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant • shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fue sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Assembly and Educational Occupancy Bwldings. 3. "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requrements (see Fire Access). 4 When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. 5 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Bulding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or . standards) requres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD 2 a~~-32 Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bulding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code • 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bwlding or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is regwred to monitored by a listed central station fue alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1. Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet • b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows• • a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. ~,~ -33 b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or mator fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fve . District access to all regwred openings 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates. Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override . deuce and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, rf applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. A, ~ 3y 8 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the bwldings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in bwldings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be regwred for larger bwldings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check i Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bulding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the fudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refrigeration Systems • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials 5 5 GrH- a • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety wdl not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fue Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality. 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased oropertv which is required to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property m writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal wdl review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are regwred on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reaprocal agreement is regwred to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated 6 ~,~~ -3b access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fue hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities Distract #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fue Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any budding permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-8, #10-4 and #10-5. The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 2 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fve construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CVWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5 Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the firnshed surface of the road 6 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is • responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 7 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fue Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants. For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the Cahforrna Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power) Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways s 8 ~ ~ H-3 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industnal and multifamily buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting • background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on bwldmgs located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 11. Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (m writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Diwsion. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fue Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use m the event of an emergency at the subfect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13 Mapping Site plan. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and budding features as regwred m the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire • Inspector • ~~ y-3~t RESOLUTION NO 06-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A SHOPPING CENTER TOTALING 28,961 SQUARE FEET INCLUDING A BAR FOR THE EL TORITO RESTAURANT ON 4 78 ACRES IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND THE I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0229-21-58 A Recitals 1 Penninsula Retail Partners, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2005-00256, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the I-15 Freeway, and b The application is m contunction with the Tentative Parcel Map division of 4 78 acres into 5 parcels, and d The protect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets or exceeds all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and e The protect will provide retail buildings in moderate size, conveniently located relative to the commeraal corridor along Foothill Boulevard and regional circulation routes m the area, and • f The architectural design of the protect incorporates stonework, reflective glazing, plaster accents, and metal work Each bwlding has a 360-degree architecture, thereby meeting the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-32 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 April 12, 2006 Page 2 design goals of the Regional Related Commercial District by providing ahigh-level of architectural design with building entrances that are well articulated 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity • 4 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA gwdelines Section 153321n-Fdl Development Protects 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Department 1) The special design treatment noted on the Landscape Plan shall be designed in conformance with the standards of the Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan 2) Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of bnck/tde pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Bwlding Permits 3) No entertainment is approved by this permit Any business, including EI Torito restaurant that desires entertainment shall, be required to submit a separate application for an Entertainment Permit Enoineerino Department 1) Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be improved in accordance with Caltrans and City "Mator Divided Highway" standards as regwred including, but not limited to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-32 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 April 12, 2006 Page 3 • Curb and gutters, sidewalk, driveway, and streetlights to loin existing as regwred • Foothill Boulevard shall have fourthrough lanes in each direction from Day Creek Boulevard to the I-15 Freeway (14 feet adjacent to the median, 12 foot, 12, foot, 17-foot right-turn lane) 2) Protect and/or provide additional traffic striping and signage as required, including R26(s) "No Stopping" signs 3) Development shall take access to Foothill Boulevard at a shared use driveway located on the westerly property line No additional driveways will be allowed 4) Reciprocal access shall be provided from all lots to Day Creek and Foothill Boulevards 5) The developer shall grant approval for sharing the common drive aisle to the developer of the project to the west 6) The developer shall loin the newly formed CFD 01-01 and pay the . necessary fair share portion, including interest (Resolution 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) prior to recordation of the final map The fee amount for the anniversary date 03/01/06 is $175,382 21 The actual fee will be determined at the time of recordation 7) The developer shall also loin the newly formed CFD 2003-01 and pay the necessary fair share portion, including interest (Resolution 01-066) for development of the infrastructure The fee shall be paid in full (lump sum) prior to the recordation of the final map The fee amount for the anniversary date 03/01/06 is $529,613 05 The actual fee will be determined at the time of recordation 8) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan and on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check 9) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department • when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Department Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the G, H- ~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-32 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 April 12, 2006 • Page 4 Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion ofthe construction and/or demolition project 10) The developer shall offer all newly constructed electrical distribution facilities for dedication to the Rancho Cucamonga Mumapal Utility and requiring all such developments to be served electrical service by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility The developer shall enter into a distribution line extension agreement with the City prior to the request for electrical service 11) The Foothill Boulevard frontage shall be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Suburban Parkway Enhancement area 12) All utilities off-site and on-site shall be handled according to the underground utility policy Utilities on the opposite side of the streets fronting the pro/ect shall have fees paid in accordance with the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the project shall be undergrounded with the policy 13) An on-site drainage study will be required and shall meet the approval of the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of Building • permits, whichever occurs first 14) The developer shall dedicate the right-of-way for future freeway improvements The developer shall landscape this right-of-way The landscape is temporary until the ramp is constructed This area shall be designed as a separate system to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 15) Obtain approval from Caltrans as it relates to drainage along the future freeway improvements and/or final right-of-way requirements The Grading Plan indicates a slope and drainage onto orwithin the ultimate Caltrans right-of-way Provide a letterfor acceptance from Caltrans or re-grade the site to eliminate the drainage onto their easement 16) Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City covering the estimated cost of operating all the streetlights during the first 6 months of operation, prior to Building Permit issuance 17) A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 • (' ~- y 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-32 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 . Apnl 12, 2006 Page 5 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS • ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~,I~- 4~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 SUBJECT: RETAIL CENTER APPLICANT: PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS, LLC LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE I-15 FREEWAY AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, APN 0229-021-58 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or to the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-32, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties mvolved to the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Foothill Boulevard -Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan Comoletion Date -/-/- / / / I / / SC-1-OS ' G,N-~s Protect No DRC2005-00256 Comolehon Date D. 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submttted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwlding and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4. Revised site plans and bwldtng elevations incorporating alt Conditions of Approval shall be J_/_ submitted for Ctty Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwldtng permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~_/_ by the Cdy Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the Issuance of building permtts. Such plan shall Indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and ~~_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/~~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner. For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed In underground vaults 10 All building numbers and individual urnts shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Cdy. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the Issuance of bwldtng permits Shopping Centers 1 The Master Plan is approved In concept only Future development for (each bwldtng pad/parcet) ~~_ shall be subject to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commisslon approval Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commisslon approval 2 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design Including seating benches, trash receptacles, ~_/_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc ,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldtng permits 3 Provide for the tollowing design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Ctty ~~_ Planner a Architecturally integrated Into the design of (the shopping center/the project) -J_/~ SC-1-OS C,rl~-4)0 Protect No DRC2005-00256 Completion Date b Separate pedestrian access that does not regwre the opening of the main doors and to -/-/- include self-closing pedestrian doors c Large enough to accommodate two trash bins -/-/- d Roll-up doors -/-/- e Trash bins with counter-weighted lids ~-/- f Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis ~-/- g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed -/_J- to be hidden from view 4 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours -/-/- 5 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and ~-/- debris remain for more than 24 hours 6 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking° and for "employee parking only ° -/-/- 7 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza -/_J- They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral colorconcrete, or anycombination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 8 All future building pads shall be seeded and vrigated for erosion control Detailed plans shall be -/-/- included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza -/-/- • area hghtmg fixtures, budding lighfing fixtures (exterior), and parking lot hghfing fixtures 10 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the bulding faces and shall not extend into ~-/- the pedestrian walkways The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits E. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ~-/- protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adlacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commeraal and industrial protects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main ~-/- building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 1 S feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts -/-/- a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall -/~- contain a 12-inch walk adlacent to the parking stall (including curb) i 5~-,-05 3 C~iH - ti l Protect No DRC2005-00256 Completion Date G. H. 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses • 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, ~_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more ~_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/~_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the fvst 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 pement of the requred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100. Where this results in a traction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for ~___/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ~_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/~_ commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree far every three parking _/_/_ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/~_ tree per 30 linear feet of bulding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than B feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or greater ~~ slope shall be landscaped and vrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s¢e shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall SC-1-05 G, ~+~ y ~ Project No DRC2005-00256 Completion Date include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy • 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas wtthin the public right-oi-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage • I. 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, wails, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Department 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering stdewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 10 Landscaping and urigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of thts protect area shall be continuously maintarned by the developer. 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined to Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code 12 On protects which abut the I-15 Freeway, the developer shall provide landscaping withtn the freeway right-of-way along the boundary of this protect or pay an in-lieu of construction cash deposit The landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared in conformance with Caltrans and City Standards through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer Landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of occupancy of the protect If final approvals and/or installation are not complete at that time, the City will accept a cash deposit for future landscaping of the Caltrans right-of-way Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits J. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The fmai location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits L_J -~-~- _/~. ~~. ~-~- ~-~- J-~ .~_/- -J-1_ _/-/_ SC-1-05 G,~-- `~9 Project No DRC2006-00256 Comole4on Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) See Attached APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Security Lighting Ail parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be rn vandal-resistant fixtures L. Security Hardware One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 ruches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used M. Windows Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: See Attached _/~_ -~-~- / / -~-~- -~-~~ -~-~- -J_/- SC-1-OS 8 rJO G,,N Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Building & Safety COMMERCIAVINDUSTRIAL STANDARD CONDITIONS December 7, 2005 I-15 Rancho Pacific, LLC S/S Foothill Blvd, W/S I-15 SUBTPM17077 & DRC2005-00256 NOTE: Any revisions may void these requirements and necessitate additional review. A. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistroe construction. 2 The protect shall be designed to comply with the 2001 California Bwiding Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 & 39 3. Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for required occupancy separations 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 7 Provide the required restroom faalities per the CBC Appendix chapter 29 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adioining rooms, rated corridors, door swings, separation of exits, etc.) 9 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requrements may be regwred 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA requirements for the disabled 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans • B. General Requirements 1 ns including the following Submit five conceptual sets of pla /t ~ ~ , ~' 17 7 i Page 1 of 3 a Site/Plot Plan C. Floor Pian c. Foundation Plan d Ceiling, Floor, and Roof Framing Plan e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams. f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. g Planning Division Tracking Number (i a ,DRC, SUBTT, SUBTPM etc) must be clearly noted on the Title Sheet of the plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance. 4 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Division. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e ,DRC, SUBTT, SUBTPM etc) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Prior to issuance of bwiding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Offiaal shall provide the street addresses after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p.m and 6'30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 1 G ~ ~/ -~ 2 Page 2 of 3 • D. Grading 1 Grading of the subfect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final Grading Plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction) additional requirements may be regwred The final Grading Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fdl The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Diwsion if you have any questions about the procedure at 909-477-2710 • G' ~~ - 5 3 Page 3 of 3 ~~ w4~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ,. -- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS December 14, 2005 Peninsula Retail Partners, LLC 12401 Foothill Blvd SUBTPM17077 & DRC2005-00256 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be accessed on the web at http•/Jwww a rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fve Construction Services section Search by article (the preceding number of the standard refers to the article). Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear with the corresponding standard, make your selection. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants (also reference RCFPD standard 9-8). a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialhndustnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. n At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required . fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof G,~s-5y FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The regwred fire flow for this protect is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual • pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2. The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed 1,500 gallons per minute at a minmum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fue flow subiect to Fire Distract review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection underground water plans are approved for all protects that must extend the existing fire protection water supply to or onto the site 5 On all site plans to be submitted for revew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant . shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 Califorrna Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in• Commeraal or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet. 2. Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 4. When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure. When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6. When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or • standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD (~~~ -55 Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or swte's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. 3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fue lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access• All portions of the structures is' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet. d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches At any private entry median, the mirnmum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driwng surface shall not exceed 12%. i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~ Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fue Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways. Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards G,H ~ 5 l~ In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 (meal feet or mafor fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire Distract access to all regwred openings 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings 5. CommerciaUlndustrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire Distract Standard #9-2 The following design regwrements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e. Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fue Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afad-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate m a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6 Fire Lane Identification• Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fve lanes. A site plan dlustratmg the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, rf applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. L_J G4~-rJ I 8 Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the bwldings on to the roofs of all commeraal, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aenal ladder. b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided m buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c The number of ladder points may be requred to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified m accordance to the roof access standard e Where the entire roof access is restncted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required f. Multiple access ladders may be regwred for larger buildings g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted dunng plan check • i Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically descnbed below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Refngeration Systems • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials G,N- 58 Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department rewews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from isswng a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. • 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased oroperty which is required to submit a Plan, is also requred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subiect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Pian mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services i Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will revew all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District °Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this protect The protect appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is regwred to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please prowde a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subiect property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated G,-~ -s~ access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract . Reaprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distract. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities Distract #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract Standards Approval of the on-site (prnrate) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any bwlding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with • RCFPD Standards # 9-8, #10-4 and #10-5 The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 2 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire Distract and CVWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8. 4 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be mstailed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 6 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received The applicant is . responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fue Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fue sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other speaal hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed m service 6. Fire Alarm System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 9 The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. u C~ • C,r~' ~.a 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraal/industrial and multi-family bwldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting . background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- dluminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commeraal and industrial bwldings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 11 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 12 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subfect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fve Construction Services Inspector 13. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire . Inspector. • C~~- (n2 T H E C I T Y O F RANCflO CUCAMONGA Sfiaff Report DATE' April 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner gY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17938- BOB GALLISHAW, INC - A request to subdivide 1 47 acre of land to convert an existing, vacant, three-story professional office budding (shell building) into 12 condominiums within the Mixed Use District (Subarea 18), located at the southwest corner of 5th Street and Milliken Avenue - APN 0210-082-70. This protect is • categorically exemptfrom the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surroundmo Land Use and Zoning): North - Existing Apartment Complexes, Mixed Use (Subarea 18) South - Office Building Faality (under construction), Mixed Use (Subarea 18) East - Industrial Buildings, Industrial Park (Subarea 12) West - Senior Living Facility, Mixed Use (Subarea 18) B General Plan Designations Project Site -Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Mixed Use East - Industrial Park West - Mixed Use C See Characteristics The protect site is developed with three multiple story professional office buildings, named "Milliken Corporate Center " ANALYSIS: A General The applicant proposes to convert a vacant three-story professional office building into 12-unit condominiums The applicant has prepared a Declaration Establishing a Plan for . Condominium Ownership, and has also prepared a budget worksheet for prospective tenants The map documentation is in accordance with the State Subdiv~~~cr~ r/iap Act and City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 27 2~ ^~% and 040 ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACE MAP SUBTT17938 -BOB GILLISHAW, INC Apn112,2006 . Page 2 B Design Committee The Committee recommended approval at their meeting on February 14, 2006 The Committee determined that, with the recommended standard and special conditions of approval, the project is consistent with the City's standards and ordinances C Environmental Assessment This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentatve Tract Map SUBTT17938 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. • DC DF/ge Attachments Exhibit A -Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17938 Exhibit B -Declaration Establishing Condominium Ownership Exhibit C -Condominium Budget Worksheet Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative Tract SUBTT17938 • S-2 Acting City Planner iArie~ro o~~rz w.+row ow ., ~ir~ LYDa YJ IAaCY1'Y?'U'CYGWIN~ ~- ~ - •wov •.JB'Kf 3~YV M3I AIMI/Yd LLtF ~ ° I'w.3:v BC6L1 dJ dYW 1JYfI13Nl Yl/~9L ~ MAy ;C ~ u. ~~~~wM[enrin w~~u • WN~4.• ~~~ 3~N3015321 .w $'~~1~ A71WY~-117NW esiR / GRf FW F ", ~, ; , ' kFie / aF4 Flv d PLFE4 R' d 3.7N301S321 uasx RY ! 7tFrFS AvrvY~-u7nw _ a nFrrY 39N30/53H A7/WY3-IL 7/7W _ .--- a ^ ~- y p M ~ H l a V j rfiF/FfF F7^[ __- -'~-- ~ r^'.tlw M~' 3 ' ~ -__ R ~PF< 3 .- 'O.:el _ _ ~ ~~ tl -~ d 'w`=o=,r'~--~~J~ --- ID -Y Yz ` 9 a i ---_~ _ r11 ~ `~w.W' 3~ '(I' -Itw = ~ 1 ~ S~.a_ T rJ.fN 4_ '~__ a _ ~ /~ F . W_ - _ - ._ r'r '' i -_ i ~I"p j v'a_, i__`~ 0 II r ,` ~ S ~s' -mow = i ~ - - -/v ' ~ ,`~ c.[ R e S a ~ tr tlum wtl ~ I ~_ I 1 F ~ I+r ~ ~ 3JYUA131 AYMWd as xJru •_~ y i I e I C ~. (11---' --iii i ~~~ Y -~ I - -------- ~,,~.a ,~ - ~~ , . Y- 3N17H71 YW ~,__-d' 1 ' y' I _• aaxlJr ';- -; ~! ~ - ;".tip ~ak;-- - ~ - --i ty ,r- ,..d -., . _ _ __ I '€I 1nk'i_ k ;.. ~~"- ~ _I.~'~ . ~OJB Ab015-C XJ i1 ~• ~ 107 1NYOYA , d' '- w 4 - i Il __ __ ___~ „~~ i„1C'-~ - ccie / GCi FR•s - a~ ~~"• ;: - ~ I~, .. rearRF<d ~+ XT/FFii i~l'i' i ~§t~i 1 .i ~.wn -il •• •'j~.n..u. mnn~w 6 a-8-1Y 1 I 1 +x >x ~d ~Aii i ~ bYatla d i _ _ ~ as I'm I r _~~~_'^ ~ Y _ sl _ 4_ ~ u ..P~f w ~=_ti_ 9-',,,;~_'~~ ~`` rte'- ~+c.~rn- a J~"'~_Ifr~'- ~ `J079 AdY)15-f X3 , .. ( 1 •Jplg Alg15-f X3 ... " , ~ FJ-Ff / iY'[ FRF t' N-Ff / IFF Y'RC f! m F iiFF ~< ~ A< .~.., a li '~ T saaawu roxwomAO 3J1lA uv ~I IXK alTNw awuKVO IxKLXIf _ - _ ~- Y- 3 AIx+1J Ors D SdgJA/ YTl1 IJAY.d A W/11W 9Y OI IY SDN 20l M%p x pMpJb dY0 tlb 5v YKMIMJ fl LY+S YMgIYNYA M5 AAINW YJI.gIrNO Odrtl A AIO ]W x XL91 ON dM 13~+'Yd }J [ 1LWr W6N(6I15 10+]B d ~~~ 8~6L1 ON dt/W l~b'Nl ~il/1 b'1N~1 ~° a ~ _~_IT H ~' a ' * An~u r ~qy, \ r a>+ ~ I i 'I :~~~ x ~ ~~ ~ ' ~` I~ ~ ~ I, Sy ~ 4~ 1 tiY- I a ~' M~ I I~ a ~--I iTT1T+T Rug ------~I ~r~ I~ adat l j aov ji 2 tx + 17Y15 `JNINNYd 53LLLLNYN0 R 8 o ~~~ ~ Za ~ oq ~ aea Q :~~ ~ _r, ~~~ 6 ~~`~ Q ~h° ey °n~ 8 W ~~e ~ ''m<~ ti ~~~ ~ w~ o- ~- p ~_- o-- o- 0--- - o---' o-o- O I I i__ --- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- i ,o , ~ ~~ o--- ---;------;-- - o-- - -~' ,,, - ~- - - oo---i , --~ -- I o--- -- - ~`r --i - , - ~ _,, ~ I 0 0 ~ o 0 ~-y F~~~ 6~~ e ~~ g ~~ g e ? S ¢ ~ p4~ 3 5 O a~ n ~ ~„ .s~ ~ y • • i• 0 0 0 • RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO MILLIKEN, LLC ) c/o G& L Corumerc~al Real Estate, L L C ) 3419 Via Lido, Suite 438 ) Newport Beach, CA 92663 ) DECLARATION ESTABLISHING A PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP FOR BUILDING #3 OF THE MILLIKEN CORPORATE CENTRE THIS DECLARATION, made on the date hereinafter set forth by MILLIKEN, LLC, a Cahfonua hmtted habtlity company ("Declarant"), is made with reference to the following facts A Declazant is the Owner of a certain real property located at 9327 Fatrway Vtew Place m the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"), County of San Bemazdmo, State of Cahfomta, as more parttculazly descnbed m Exhtbrt A • B. The Property contains one (1) office butldtng commonly known as Building #3 (the "Building") that wtll be compnsed of twelve (12) Condommtum Umts C Each Owner of a Condomtmum Untt wtll own a sepazate interest m such Condomtmum Umt and an undrvtded common interest m all Common Areas, other than Restncted Common Areas. D. The Property is located wtthtn that certain Master Project also contatning Butldmg #1 at 9333 Fatrway Vtew Place and Building #2 at 9353 Faztway Vtew Place (collectively, with the Property, the "Master Protect" or the "Mtlhken Corporate Centre") E The Master Protect, including the Property, is subject to that certain Declazation of Covenants, Condttions and Restnctions or Easements for Mtlhken Corporate Centre made by Stlver Oak Development I, LLC, as of Apn127, 2004 and recorded to the Offictal Records as Document No 2004-0325148, as maybe amended from time to rime (the "Master Protect Restnctions") F Declarant intends by thts document to tmpose upon the Property mutually benefictal restnchons under a general plan of tmprovement for the benefit of all of the Condomtmum Untts and the Owners thereof and m accordance with the terms and condttions set forth m the Master Project Restncttons. • EXHIBIT B ~ - s NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that the hereinafter descnbed • Property shall beheld, conveyed, mortgaged, encumbered, leased, rented, used, occupied, sold, and improved, subject to the following declarations, limitations, covenants, conditions, restnctions, and easements, all of which are imposed as equitable serntudes pursuant to a general plan for the development of the Property for the purpose of enhancing and protecting the value and attractiveness of the Property, and the Protect, and every part thereof, m accordance with the plan for the improvement of the Property and the division thereof into condomimums All of the limitations, covenant, conditions, restnctions, and easements shall constitute covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon Declarant and its successors and assigns, and all parties having or acquiring any nght, title, or interest in or to any part of the Property or the Protect. ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1 1 "Architectural Control Committee" shall mean and refer to the committee created under Article 7, Section 7 9 hereof 1 2 "Articles" shall mean and refer to the Articles of Association of the Association, as amended from tune to time 1 3 "Assessment" shall mean that portion of the cost of maintaining, improving, repainng, operating, and managing the Property which is to paid by each • Condominium Owner as determined by the Association pursuant to this Declazation "Association" shall mean and refer to the 9327 FAIRWAY VIEW PLACE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, a Cahfomia nonprofit, mutual benefit corporation, the members of which shall be the Owners of Condominium Units in the Protect. 1 4 "Board" or "Board of Directors" shall mean and refer to the governing body of the Association 1 5 "Bylaws" shall mean and refer to the Bylaws of the Association, as amended from time to tune. 1 6 "Common Area" shall mean and refer to all of the Property (excepting the individual Condominium Umts), an undivided interest m wtuch shall be owned m common by each of the Owners Subject to Section 2.3(a), the Common Area includes, without limitation land, pazkmg and dnveway areas, trash enclosures, conduits, pipes, plumbing, wires, and other utility installations (except the outlets thereof when located within any Condommmm Unit) (and including air conditiomng installments located on the roof of any building but excepting utility and air conditiomng installations located within a Condominium Unit or located on the roof of a building but servicing only a particulaz Condominium Umt) required to provide power, fight, telephone, gas, water, sewerage, drainage, and elevator service, elevators and elevator lobbies, stairways, • z ~-~D 19965 2 . extenor spnnklers and spnnkler pipes, built-m fire detection, protection and prevention devices and egwpment 1.7 "Common Expenses" means and includes the actual and estimated expenses of operating the Common Area and any reasonable reserve for such purposes as found and detennmed by the Board and all sums designated Common Expenses by or pursuant to the Condominium Documents Common Expenses shall include the actual and estimate expenses of penodic maintenance and testing of any built-in fire protection devices or egwpment Common Expenses shall also include amounts paid or incurred by the Association m compl}nng with and/or perfonnmg the restnchons and obligations contained m the Master Project Restnctions as such restnctions and obligations relate to the Community Facilities, mcludmg, without limitation, all amounts paid by the Association for Assessments or membership fees which have been levied upon or charged against the Property by any association established under the Master Protect Restnctions, and expenses incurred by the Association for any reason whatsoever m connection with the Community Facilities, tlvs Declazation or any amendment to this Declazation, the Articles or Bylaws or m furtherance of the purpose of the Association or m the discharge of any obligations imposed on the Association or the Boazd by this Declaration or any amendment to this Declazation 1.8 "Common Interest" means the proportionate undivided interest m the Common Area that is part of each Condominium Unit as set forth m tins Declazation. • 1 9 "Community Facilities" means those portions of the Master Protect designated for the common use, enjoyment and/or benefit of all the owners within the Master Protect, mcludmg those locations outside the Building that are defined as "common azeas" by the Master Project Restnctions, as amended 1 10 "Condominium" shall mean an estate in real property as defined in California Civil Code &5783 and 1351(8, consisting of an undrnded interest m common m the Common Area and a sepazate interest m a Umt. 1 11 "Condominium Plan" shall mean and refer to any recorded three- dimensional plan of the Condominiums built or to be built on the Property which identifies the Common Area and each separate interest pursuant to Cahfomia Civil Code § 1351 A copy of the initial Plan is recorded. 1 12 "Condominium Unit" shall have the same meaning here as the term "Unit" m the Condominium Plan 1.13 "Declazant" shall mean and refer to MILLII{EN LLC, and its successor developer(s) and assigns. 1.14 "Declazation" shall mean and refer to this enabling Declaration, as . amended or supplemented from time to time. 3 ~ ~~ 19965 2 1 15 "F~rst Lender" shall mean any person, entity, bank, savings and loan • association, insurance company, or financial institution holding a recorded first mortgage on any Condomm~um 1.16 "Hazazdous Matenals" shall mean and refer to (i) any hazazdous or toxic wastes, matenals, or substance, and other pollutants or contaminants, which are or become regulated by all applicable local, state, and federal laws, including, but not hmrted to, 42 USCA §§6901 et seq , 42 USCA §§9601 et seq ,and Cahfonua Health and Safety Codes §§25100 et seq., and 25300 et seq , (u) petroleum and petroleum based products, (ui) asbestos, (iv) polychlonnated b~phenyls, and (v) radioactive matenals 1 17 "Improvements" shall mean and refer to all structures and improvements of every type and land, whether above or below the land surface, mcludmg, without hm~tation, all bu~ldmgs, accessory structures, outbu~ldmgs, underground installations, slope and grade alterations, dnveways and roads, curbs, gutters, walls, screening walls and bamers, retaining walls, transformers, electncal switch geaz/closets, fire monitonng equipment, meters, crrcurt breaker panels, stags, decks, windbreaks, plantings, planted trees, shrubs and other landscaping, poles and signs 1 18 "Map" shall mean and refer to that Tract No. recorded m the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Califom~a, as shown on a Map recorded m Book _, Pages _ and _, inclusive, m the Official Records. 1.19 "Master Protect" shall have the same meaning as set forth above m • Recital D. 1 20 "Master Project Restnct~ons" shall have the same meaning as set forth above m Recital E 1 21 "Member" shall mean and refer to a person entitled to membership m the ASSOCIatIOn as provided herein 1 22 "Mortgage" shall include a deed of trust as well as a mortgage. 1.23 "Mortgagee" shall include a beneficrary or a holder of a deed of trust as well as a mortgagee 1 24 "Mortgagor" shall include the trustor of a deed of trust as well as a mortgagor. 1 25 "Official Records" shall mean the Office of the County Recorder of San Bemazdmo County, Cahfonua 1 26 "Owner" or "Owners" shall mean and refer to the record holder or holders oftitle, ifmore than one (1), of a Condominium m the Project This shall include any • person havrng a fee simple title to any Condominium, but shall exclude persons or 4 Z '~ 19965 2 • entities having any interest merely as secunty for the performance of an obligation If a Condominium is sold under a contract of sale and the contract is recorded, the purchaser, rather than the fee Owner, shall be considered the "Owner," from and after the date the Association receives wntten notice of the recorded contract 1 27 "Person" means a natural person, a corporation, a partnership, a trustee, or other legal entity 1 28 "Protect" shall mean and refer to the entire real property subject to the Declazation, including all structures and improvements erected or to be erected thereon 1 29 "Protect Documents" shall mean this Declazation, as amended from trine to time, the Exhibits, if any, attached thereto, together with the other basrc documents used to create and govern the Protect, including the Map, the Articles, the Bylaws, and the Condomuuum Plan (but excluding unrecorded rules and regulations adopted by the Boazd or the Association) 1 30 "Property" or "Properties" means and includes the real property descnbed in Exhibit A attached hereto and all improvements erected thereon and all property, real, personal, or mixed intended for or used m connecrion with the Condominium Umts 1 31 "Restncted Common Areas" shall mean and refer to that portion of the . Common Areas set aside m the Condominium Plan or under this Declazation for use by an Owner or the Owners (as the case maybe) 1 32 "Share" means the percentage of ownership m the Assocration attributed to and appurtenant to each Condomimum Unit as set forth m Section 2 3(b) and m Exhibit B attached hereto 1 33 "Suite" shall mean and refer to a group of contiguous Condomimum Umts (not less than two (2) in number) under ownership by one (1) Owner. 1 34 "Unit Designation" means the number of designation(s) shown on the Condominium Plan. Each Condominium Umt is identified by a separate number on the Condomimum Plan ARTICLE 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT, DIVISION OF PROPERTY, AND CREATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 1 Description of Protect The Protect is a condominium protect consisting of the land, the Condominiums, and all other improvements thereon Reference is made to the Condomimum Plan for further details Private restroom facilities constructed or located within Condominium Units (if any) aze for the exclusive use of the Owners of • said Condominium Units Plumbing, heat, and/or air conditioning for the Condominium Units (except air conditioning installations located on the roof (other than any installation that services only a particulaz Condominium Unit) which shall be the responsibility of the ~- 1 19965 2 Association) shall be the responsibility of each Owner No Suite shall be without direct . access directly to the outside Transfer of title to a Condommmm which would result m a "landlocked" condommmm (one not having ingress and egess access to the Common Area either d>rectly or via other Condominium Units owned by the same Owner) is not permitted The shaze of assessments, votes, and undivided interests m the Common Area attnbutable to a Suite Owner shall be the sum total of the percentage assessments, votes, and undivided interests m the Common Area attnbutable to the Condommmm Units comprising such Owner's Suite, as reflected for each Condomrum Unit on Exhibit B 2 2 [Intentionally deleted.] 2.3 Division of Property The Property ~s divided as follows (a) Condom~mum Units. Each of the Condominium Units as sepazately shown, numbered and designated m the Condomm~um Plan, consists of the space bounded by and contained within the extenor finished surfaces of the perimeter walls, ceilings or roofs, as the case maybe, roofs, windows, window frames, doors and door frames and trim, of each unit, each of such space being defined and referred to herern as a "Condominium Unit" (and m the case of a Condominium Umt whose boundary wall has been removed as herern provided, or has not yet been constructed, the boundanes shall until the time of construction, be as described on the Condominium Plan) Anything herern to the contrazy notw~thstandmg, the upper boundary of any first floor and second floor Condominium Unit shall be its ceiling and the upper boundary of each third floor Condom~mum Umt shall be the interior underside of the extenor roof. Thus, the azea • above and immediately under the roof of the bu~ldmg belongs to each third floor Condomm~um Unit Owner, which should fac~htate the right and abrltty hereby given for each such Owner to install, maintain, and repair air conditioning fixtures m the arrspace above these Condominium Units and air conditioning units on the bu~ldmg roof, serving an mdiv~dual Condomm~um Unrt, if any, all of such air conditioning features to be maintained by the Owner Whenever an extenor wall rs constructed rmmedrately adjacent to another Condommram Unit, the space between the extenor surfaces of such drndmg walls shall be treated as "Common Area" for the purposes hereunder (mcludmg, without hmrtation, use, repairs, insurance, and maintenance) so long as the walls remain m place, and the ownership of the adjoining Condominium Units remains separate Beanng walls located within the interior of a Condominium Unrt are part of the Condomm~um Unit Each Condominium Umt includes the utility installations located w~tlun its boundaries that the Owner has exclusive use of, mcludmg, without hmrtahon Space heaters, arr conditioning amts, plumbing and fighting fixtures whether or not located entirely within the Condommrum Unit they serve For example, an air condrhomng amt serving only one Condominium Unit and located on the building roof will be a part of the Condomrum Umt ~t serves as will all ducts and w~nng for such Condominium Untt, and thus the air condmomng fixtures will be maintained by the Owner whose Condominium Umt rs served by these air conditioning fixtures and not by the Association Each Condominium Unit includes both the portions of the building so described and the airspace so encompassed. The Condominium Unit does not include those azeas and those things which are expressly defined as "Common Area" m Section (b) below Compressed azr, suction, and gas or oxygen generating, storage and • 6 Z-~ ~ 19965 2 • distribution equipment, and condwts contamed within a Suite of Units shall be owned, insured, and mamtamed by the Owner(s) of saki Suite (i) The plumbing, sewer, electnc wrong, telephone cables, and other utilities and sernces located m the floor area of a Condominium Unit or inside of the penmeter walls of such Condominium Umt, as well as the plumbing, sewer, electnc wrong, telephone cables, and other utilities and services located outside of the penmeter walls of a Condominium Umt, are part of the Common Area, excepting that any wires, pipes, conduits, cables, and the tike ("Lines") which connect facilities servicing Owner's Condominium Unit shall be owned, mamtamed, and installed by the Owner as Restricted Common Area from the point of connection with the common Lines to the point where the Lines tennmate m the Owner's Condommmm Unit (n) Each Condominium is subject to such encroachments as are contamed m the building m which the Condominium Units are located, whether the same now exist, or maybe later caused or created, in any manner referred to in Section 9 5 In interpreting deeds and the Condominium Plan, the then existing physical boundanes of a Condominium Umt m the Project reconstructed m good faith m substantial accordance with the original plans thereof, shall be conclusively presumed to be its boundanes rather than the boundanes expressed in the deed or Condominium Plan, regardless of settling or lateral movement of the building and regardless of minor vanance between boundanes shown on the plan or deed, and those of the building Each Condominium shall have • appurtenant to it nonexclusive easements for ingress, egress, and support through the Common Area. (b) Common Areas. The portion of the Property not constituting Condominium Units or Restricted Common Area shall be referred to herein as "Common Area" or "Common Areas" and includes, without hmrtahon, all of the elements set forth m Section 1 7 Each Owner shall have, as appurtenant to its Condominium Umt, an undivided common ownership interest m the Common Area m the percentage set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein (the "Owner's Share") Each Condominium Untt shall have appurtenant to rt nonexclusive easements for ingress, egress, and support through the Common Area The undivided common ownership by each Owner m the Common Area shall be appurtenant to each Condominium Umt and is declared to be permanent m character and cannot be altered without the consent of all the Owners affected, as expressed m an amended Declaration Subject to the provision of this Declaration, each Owner may use the Common Areas m accordance with the purposes for which they are intended without hindering the exercise of or encroaching upon the rights of any other Owners, subject to the rights of Owners in any Restricted Common Area appurtenant to that Owner's Condominium Umt. (c) Restricted Common Areas The separate space shown and labeled on the Condommmm Plan as "Restricted Common Area" is hereby set aside and allocated exclusively for use by Owners for utility and mechanical connection and other authorized purposes The use of the Restricted Common Areas by such Owners is restricted to being . only for such utility and mechanical connections as was (1) included m such Restricted Common Area by Declarant, (2) added to such Restricted Common Area by the 7 Z ~'' 19965 2 Association; or (3) added by an Owner at such Owner's cost and with the express wntten consent of the Association • (d) Parkm>? All pazking spaces (except any within the intenor of Condominium Umts) within the Project are unassigned parking spaces Such pazking may be used by all Owners, their tenants, and guests, pursuant to rules adopted by the Board All pazking spaces shall be used for parking permitted vehicles only and not for the permanent or temporary pazking or storage of boats, trailers, or nonmobile vehicles of any descnption The Association may establish commercially reasonable rules and regulations from time to time for the pazkmg of vehicles, provided that such rules may not abndge the exclusivity of use by an Owner of any parking space located within a Condominium Unit. In addition, and notwithstanding anything m this Declaration to the contrary, no Owner shall be permitted to use more than a pro rata number of parking spaces within the Project, based on the relationship of the total usable square footage of such Owner's Condomimum Unit(s) to the total usable square footage of all Condominium Units at the Project, for its own use or for use by its tenants or guests (e) Stairways Stairways servicing second and third floor Condomimum Umts shall be Common Area for the non-exclusive use of the Owners of the first floor, second floor and third floor Condomimum Units, and such Owners' tenants, guest and invitees (f) No Separate Conveyance ofUndrnded Interests The appurtenance of the Common Area interests to each Condomimum Unit is hereby established and cannot • be changed, except as herein set forth, and Declazant, its successors, assigns and grantees covenant and agree that the interests m the Common Areas and the respective Condominium Units conveyed therewith, shall not be separated or separately conveyed, and such interests shall be deemed to be conveyed or encumbered with its respective Condominium Unit, even though the descnption m the instrument of conveyance or encumbrance may refer only to the fee title to the Condominium Urut. (g) Easements Reserved Automatically When an undivided common interest m the Common Area is conveyed by Declarant to an Owner, an easement shall be deemed automatically reserved over the Common Area m favor of Declazant, for ingress and egress, and for the construction or completion of construction of utilities, landscaping, parking area, and other amenities included m plans approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The easement shall automatically terminate four (4) years after the recordation of this Declaration. 2 4 Rights of Entrv and Use The Condominium Uruts and Common Area (including Restncted Common Area) shall be subject to the following nghts of entry and use (a) The right of the Association agents or employees to enter any Condommmm Unrt to cure any violation of thus Declaration or the Bylaws, provided that the Owner has received notice and a heanng as required by the Bylaws (except in the case of an emergency) and the Owner has failed to cure the violation or take steps T-l2 19965 2 . necessary to cure the violation or take steps necessary to cure the violation within thirty (30) days after the finding of a vtolatton by the Association (b) The access nghts of the Association to maintain, repair, construct, or replace improvements or Property located m the Common Area as descnbed m Section 5.2(e) (c) The nghts of the Owners, the Assoctahon, and the Declazant to install, maintain, repair, or replace utilities as descnbed m Article 6 (d) The encroachment easements descnbed m Section 9 5. (e) The nghts of the Declazant dunng the construction penod as described to Section 2 3(g) (f) The nghts of Owners to make improvements or alterations authonzed by Cahfomia Civil Code § 1360(a)(2), subject to the provisions of Section 7.9 to the extent applicable 2.5 Partition Prohibited. The Common Areas shall remain m the ownership of the Owners and shall remain undivided, as set forth above. Except as provided by Cahfomia Civil Code § 1359, no Owner shall bnng any action for partition, it being • agreed that this restnchon is necessary m order to preserve the nghts of the Owners with respect to the operation and management of the Project Judicial partition by sale of a single Condomimum Umt owned by two (2) or more persons and division of the sale proceeds is not prohibited hereby, but partition of title to a single Condominium Unit is prohibited ARTICLE 3. ASSOCIATION, ADMINISTRATION, MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS 3.1 Association to Mana>;e Common Areas. Subject to nghts expressed m this Declazation with respect to certazn Restncted Common Areas, the management of the Common Area shall be vested m the Association m accordance with its Bylaws. The Owners of all the Condominiums covenant and agree that the administration of the Project shall be m accordance with the provisions of this Declazation, the Articles and Bylaws of the Association 3.2 Membership The Owner of a Condominium Umt shall automattcally, upon becoming the Owner of same, be a member of the Association, and shall remain a member thereof until such time as the ownership ceases for any reason, at which time the membership m the Association shall automattcally cease Membership shall be held m accordance with the Articles and Bylaws of the Assoctahon. • 3 3 Transferred Membership Membership m the Association shall not be transferred, pledged, or alienated m any way, except upon and m conjunction with the 9 Z-t3 19965 2 sale or encumbrance of the Condommlum Unit to which it rs appurtenant, and then only • to the purchaser, in the case of a sale, or Mortgagee, in the case of an encumbrance of such Condomrmum On any transfer of tale to an Owner's Condommlum Unit, mcludmg a transfer on the death of an Owner, membership passes automatically with title to the transferee A Mortgagee does not have membership nghts until it obtains tale to the Condominium by foreclosure or deed m lieu thereof Any attempt to make a prohibited transfer rs void. No member may resign lus or her membership On nonce of a transfer, the Association shall record the transfer on its books 3.4 Membershin Classes and Votine 12i>;hts The Association shall have one (1) class of voting membership titled Class A Memberships Class A members shall be all Owners mcludmg the Declazant and shall be entitled to the number of votes set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein for each Condomrmum Unit owned When more than one (1) person holds an interest m any Condominium Umt, all such persons shall be members. The vote for such Condominium Unit shall be exercised as they among themselves determine, but in no event shall more votes than an Owner is entitled be cast with respect to any Condominium Unit. (a) Any action by the Association which must have the approval of the members before being undertaken shall require the vote or wntten assent of a ma~onty of Class A members Voting nghts attnbutable to Condominium Units shall not vest until • assessments against the Condommlum Units have been levied by the Association ARTICLE 4. MAINTENANCE AND ASSESSMENTS 4 1 Creation of the Lren and Personal ObhQation of Assessments The Declazant, for each Condominium Unrt within the Project, hereby covenants, and each Owner of any Condominium Unit by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not rt shall be so expressed in such deed, covenants, and agrees: (1) To pay the Association annual assessments or charges, and special assessments for purposes permitted herein, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided; and (2) To allow the Association to enforce any assessment lien established hereunder by non- ~udreial proceedings under a power of sale or by any other means authonzed by law The annual and special assessments, together with interest, late chazges, collection costs, and reasonable attorney fees, shall be a charge on each of the Condominium Units and shall create a continuing hen upon each Condominium Unit against which each such assessment is made, the lien to become effective upon recordation of a notice of delinquent assessment Each such assessment, together with interest, late charges, collection costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees, shall also be the personal obligation of" the person who was the Owner of such Condominium Umt at the time when the assessment fell due. No Owner shall be exempt from liability for payment of assessments by waiver of the use or enjoyment of the Common Areas or by the abandorunent of the Owner's Condomrmum Umt • to z-~y 19965 2 . 4.2 Purpose of Assessments The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote the economic interests, health, safety, and welfaze of all the Owners, and to enable the Association to perform rts obligations hereunder 4.3 Assessments (a) Annual Assessments The Boazd shall establish and levy annual assessments m an amount that the Boazd estimates will be sufficient to raise the funds needed to perform the duties of the Association dunng each fiscal yeaz. The annual assessment shall include a portion for reserves m such amounts as the Boazd m rts discretion considers appropnate to meet the costs of the futwe repair, replacement, or additions to the mayor improvements and fixtures that the Association is obligated to maintain and repair. Reserve funds shall be deposited in a separate account and the signatures of at least two (2) persons who shall either be members of the Board or one officer who is not a member of the Board and a member of the Board shall be required to withdraw monies from the reserve account Reserve funds may not be expended for any purpose other than reparnng, replacing, or adding to the mayor improvements or fixtures that the Association is obligated to marntam without the consent of Owners holding a ma~onty of the voting power, either at a duly held meeting or by wntten ballot (b) Snecial Assessments. The Board, at any time, may levy a special assessment in order to raise funds for unexpected operating or other costs, insufficient • operating or reserve funds, to satisfy assessments made against the Property pursuant to the Master Project Restnctions, or such other purposes as the Boazd in its discretion considers appropnate Special assessments shall be allocated among the Condominium Units m the same manner as annual assessments, provided that: (1) Any special assessments agarnst Owners to raise funds for the repair, replacement, or addition of that portion of the Common Area that contains the Condominium Units shall be levied on the basis of the ratio of the square footage of the floor area of the Condominium Unit to be assessed to the total square footage of floor azea of all the Condominium Units to be assessed, and (2) the Board may levy a special assessment agarnst a member to reimburse the Association for costs incurred m bringing the member and rts Condominium Umt into compliance with the provisions of the Project Documents 4 4 Reserves for Relacement As part of the regulaz annual assessments for maintenance authonzed above, the Board of Directors shall annually fix the amount to be contnbuted pro rata by each member to reserve funds for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost or estimated cost of any reconstruction, repair, or replacement ' of improvements, including fixtures and personal Property related thereto Such determination shall be made after consideration of the need for additional funds and of the Association's capital position The Board shall marntam a separate account for those reserve funds The Board shall fix the method of payment of such assessments and shall be empowered to permit either lump sum or monthly payments Repair and maintenance funds shall be used solely for repair and maintenance within the Project. Reserve funds • shall be used solely for reconstruction or replacement of improvements, including fixtures and persona] Property. ii Z-\rj 19965 2 4.5 Nonce and Ouorum for Any Action Authonzed Under Section 4 3. Any • action authonzed under Section 4 3, which requues a vote of the memberstup, shall be taken at a meeting called for that purpose, wntten notice of which shall be sent to all Members not less than ten (] 0) nor more than ninety (90) days in advance of the meeting specifying the place, day, and hour of the meeting and, m the case of a special meeting, the nature of the business to be undertaken The action may also be taken without a meetng pursuant to the provisions of California Corporation Code §7513. 4 6 Division of Assessments Except as provided in Section 4 3, all assessments, both annual and special, shall be chazged to, allocated among, and paid by the Owners of the Condominium Units m the same proportion as voting nghts and Shazes are allocated and established in Exhibit B Assessments may be collected on a monthly basis 4.7 Date of Commencement of Annual Assessment Due Dates The regnlaz assessments provided for herein shall commence as to all Condominium Units covered by this Declaration on the first day of the month as selected by the Declazant, provided that assessments shall commence no later than the first day of the month following the conveyance of the first Condominium Umt sold by Declazant. Subject to the provisions of Section 4 3 hereof, the Boazd of Directors shall determine and fix the amount of the annual assessment against each Condominium Umt and send wntten nonce thereof to every Owner at least forty-five (45) days in advance of each annual assessment period. The due dates shall be established by the Boazd of Directors. The Association shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable chazge, furnish a certificate signed by an officer of the • Association setting forth whether the assessments on a specified Condominium Unit have been paid. Such a certificate shall be conclusive evidence of such payment 4 8 Effect of Nonnayment of Assessments Any assessment not paid within fifteen (15) days after the due date shall bear interest at the rate often percent (10%) per annum commencing thirty (30) days after the due date until paid, and shall incur a late payment penalty in the amount of Fifty Dollazs ($50 00) or ten percent (10%) of the delinquent assessment, whichever is greater 4 9 Transfer of Condominium Umt by Sale or Foreclosure Sale or transfer of any Condominium Unit shall not affect the assessment hen However, the sale of any Condominium Unit pursuant to foreclosure of a Mortgage shall extinguish the hen of such assessments (including attorney's fees, late charges, or interest levied m connection therewith) as to payments which became due pnor to such sale or transfer (except for assessment hens recorded pnor to the Mortgage) No sale or transfer shall relieve such Condominium Umt from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due or from ' the lien thereof Where the Mortgagee of a Mortgage of record or other purchaser of a Condominium Unit obtains title to the same as a result of foreclosure of any such Mortgage, such acquirer of tale, his successor and assigns, shall not be liable for the share of the assessments by the Association chazgeable to such Condominium Umt which became due pnor to the acquisition of title to such Condominium Umt by such acquirer (except for assessment liens recorded pnor to the Mortgage) Such unpaid shaze of • assessments shall be deemed to be Common Expenses collectible from all of the Owners including such acquirer, his successors or assigns. If a Condominium Umt is transferred, tz Z-~b 19965 2 • the grantor shall remain liable to the Association for all unpaid assessments against the Condominium Unit through and including the date of the transfer. The grantee shall be entitled to a statement from the Association, dated as of the date of transfer, setting forth the amount of the unpaid assessments against the Condominium to be transferred and the Condommlum shall not be subject to a hen for unpaid assessments m excess of the amount set forth in the statement provided, however, the grantee shall be (table for any assessments that become due after the date of the transfer. 4 10 Pnonttes• Enforcement, Remedies If an assessment is delinquent, the Association may record a notice of delinquent assessment and establish a hen against the Condomimtm Unrt of the delinquent Owner pnor and supenor to all other hens except (1) All taxes, bonds, assessments, and other levies which, bylaw, would be supenor thereto, and (2) The hen or charge of any Mortgage of record made m good faith and for value The notice of delinquent assessment shall state the amount of the assessment, collection costs, attorney's fees, late charges and interest, a descnptton of the Condommlum Umt against which the assessment and other sums aze levied, the name of the record Owner, and the name and address of the trustee authonzed by the Assoctation to enforce the lien by sale The notice shall be signed by any officer of the Assoctation or any management agent retained by the Association (a) An assessment lien may be enforced to any manner permitted by law, including sale by the court, sale by the trustee designated m the notice of delinquent • assessment, or sale by a trustee substituted pursuant to California Civil Code §2934(a). Any sale by the trustee shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of §§2924, 2924(6), 2924(c), 2924(f), 2924(g), and 2924(h) of the Cahfomia Civil Code, including any successor statutes thereto, applicable to the exercise of powers of sale in mortgages and deeds of trust, or m any other manner permitted by law Nothing herein shall preclude the Association from bnnging an action directly against an Owner for breach of the personal obligation to pay assessments. (b) Fines and penalties for violation of restrictions aze not "assessments," and are not enforceable by assessment lien (c) The Assoctation, acting on behalf of the Owners, shall have the power to bid for the Condominium Untt at foreclosure sale, and to acquire and hold, ]ease, mortgage and convey, the same Where the purchase of a foreclosure Condommtum Unit will result m a Five percent (5%) or greater increase m assessments, the purchase shall require the vote or wntten consent of a majority of the total voting power of the Association Dunng the period a Condominium Unrt is owned by the Assoctation following foreclosure (1) No nght to vote shall be exercised on behalf of the Condommtum Umt, (2) No assessment shall be assessed or levied on the Condomimim Umt, and (3) Each other Condommlum Umt shall be charged, in addition to its usual assessment, its pro rata share of the assessment that would have been charged to such Condominium Umt had rt not been acquired by the Association as a result of foreclosure. • (d) After acquinng title to the Condominium Unrt at foreclosure sale following notice and publication, the Assoctation may execute, acknowledge, and record 13 Z - ~, 19965 2 a deed conve}~ng tale to the Condommmm Umt, which deed shall be binding upon the Owners, successors, and all other parties. 4.11 Unallocated Taxes In the event that any taxes are assessed against the Common Area, or the personal Property of the Assoc~at~on, rather than against the Condomm~um Umts, the taxes shall be included m the assessments made under the provisions of Section 4.1 and, ~f necessary, a special assessment maybe levied against the Condominium Unrts m an amount equal to the taxes, to be pard m two (2) rnstallments, thirty (30) days pnor to the due date of each tax installment 4 12 No Offsets All assessments shall be payable m the amount spectfied by the assessment, and no offsets against such amount shall be permitted for any reason, mcludmg without hmitat~on, as a result of a clam that the Association ~s not properly exerc~smg its dunes and powers as provided m this Declazation 4.13 Initial Ca~rtahzat~on. Concurrent with the ~mtial purchase of each Condomm~um Umt from Declarant or its successor, the purchasing Owner shall contnbute to the Association an amount equal to one month of the then applicable assessment for such Condomm~um Umt ARTICLE 5. DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE ASSOCIATION 5 1 Duties. In addrt~on to the duties enumerated m its Bylaws, or elsewhere • provided for m this Declaration, and without hmrting the generality thereof, the Association shall perform the following duties• (a) Maintenance Except as herein otherwise provided, the Association shall maintain, repair, replace, restore, inspect, keep clean, operate, and manage all of the Common Area and all facilities (mcludmg the utility fac~hties to the extent descnbed m Section 6.3), improvements, fum~shmgs, egwpment, and landscaping thereon (mcludmg, without hmrtation, drainage swales and culverts, slopes, banks, and landscape areas, and underground commonly owned service and utility improvements), and all other Property that is Common Area, provided that each Owner shall maintain any Restncted Common Area appurtenant to that Owner's Condomm~um Umt m a neat and clean condition Maintenance shall include (without hmrtat~on). painting, maintaining, cleaning, repamng, and replacing of all Common Areas, mcludmg landscaping, plumbing and water fines from and before the point of any connection servtces only m the Common Areas, and any fire spnnklers and extingwshers located m the Common Area. The responsibrhty of the Association for maintenance and repair shall not extend to repairs or replacements ans~ng out of or caused by the willful or negligent act or omission of an Owner, or lus guests, tenants, or invitees, the cost of which is not covered by insurance tamed by the Association Such repays shall be made by the responsible Owner, provided the Board approves the person actually making the repairs and the method of repair If the responsible Owner fads to take the necessary steps to make the repairs within a reasonable time under the circumstances, the Association shall make the repays and chazge the cost thereof to the responsible Owner, which cost shall beaz interest at the rate • often percent (10%) per annum (but no greater than the maximum rate authonzed by 14 = - ~ 8 19965 2 • law) until paid m full If an Owner disputes his or her respons~bilrty for the repairs, the Owner shall be entitled to notice and a heanng as provided m the Bylaws before any chazge maybe imposed Individual water heaters (rf any) located within the Condomimum Umt served thereby, shall be maintained by the Owner of the Condominium Unit The Association shall have the Common Area penod~cally (at least on an annual bans) inspected for tenmtes and shall take appropnate corrective measures therefor. In addition, the Association ~s responsible for prov~dmg the penodic maintenance and operational testing (at least on an annual basis) of any fire protection devices m the Common Area, to be carried out by qualified personnel m accordance with manufacturers' specifications (b) Insurance The Association shall maintain such policy or policies of insurance as are required by Section 9 8 of this Declaration (c) D~schazge of Dens The Association shall discharge by payment, if necessary, any hen against the Common Area, and chazge the cost thereof to the member or members responsible for the existence of the hen (after notice and a heanng, as provided to the Bylaws). (d) Assessments. The Association shall fix, levy, collect, and enforce assessments as set forth ~n Article 4 hereof. (e) Payment of Expenses. The ASSOCIatIOn shall pay all expenses and • obligations incurred by the Association m the conduct of its business including, without limitation, all licenses, taxes, or governmental charges levied or imposed against Property included as Common Area (f) Enforcement The Association shall enforce this Declazation 5 2 Powers In addition to the powers enumerated in its Bylaws, or elsewhere provided for herein, and without limiting the generality thereof, the Association shall have the following powers (a) Utility Service The Association shall have the authonty to obtain, for the benefit of all of the Condomimum Umts, all water and refuse collection, power washing for the buildings, and extenor window cleaning sernces The Boazd may determine that an increased share of any commonly metered uttlrty costs wrll be allocated to a part~culaz Condommturn Unrt if tt reasonably appears to the Boazd that a particular Condominium Umt does, or can reasonably be expected to, use more than an average amount of such utilities In the event any Owner disagrees wrth the Boazd's allocation of commonly metered utility costs, that Owner may have the matter submitted to azbitration under the rules of the Amencan Arbitration Association. • 15 ~-~~ 19965 2 (b) Easements The Association, on behalf of the Owners, shall have • authonty, with the approval oftwo-thirds (2/3) of the total voting power of the Association, to grant easements m addition to those shown on the Map, where necessary for utilities, cable television, and sewer facilities over the Common Area to serve the common and open space azeas and the Condomtmum Units (c) Manager The Association may employ a manager or other persons and contract with independent contractors or managing agents to perform all or any part of the duties and responsibilities or the Association, except for the responsibility to levy fines, impose discipline, hold heanngs, file suit, record or foreclose hens, or make capital expenditures, provided that any contract with a firm or person appointed as a manager or managing agent shall not exceed a one (1) year teen, shall provide for the nght of the Association to tennmate the same at the first annual meeting of the members of the Association, and to terminate the same for cause on thirty (30) days wntten notice, or without cause or payment of a tennmation fee on ninety (90) days wntten notice. The Association may terminate the contract of any person or fine engaged by Declazant to perform management or maintenance duties three (3) months after the Association assumes control of the Project or any time thereafter. (d) Adontion of Rules The Association or the Boazd may adopt reasonable rules not inconsistent with this Declaration or the Master Project Restnctions, as amended, relating to the use of the Common Area and all facilities thereon, and [he conduct of Owners and their tenants and guests with respect to the Property and other Owners • (e) Access For the purpose of performing construction, replacement, maintenance, or emergency repair for the benefit of the Common Area or the Owners m common, the Association's agents or employees shall have the nght, after reasonable notice (not less than twenty-four (24) hours except in emergencies) to the Owner thereof, to enter any Condomimum Umt or to enter any portion of the Common Area at reasonable hours Such entry shall be made with as little mconvemence to the Owner as practicable, and any damage caused thereby shall be repaired by the Board at the expense of the Assoclatton. (f) Assessments, Liens, and Fines The Association shall have the power to levy and collect assessments in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 hereof. The Association may Impose fines or take disciplinary action against any Owner for failure to pay assessments or for violation of any provision of the Project Documents Penalties may include, but aze not limited to• Fines, temporary suspension of voting nghts, or other appropnate discipline, provided that the member is given notice and a heanng as provided to the Bylaws before the imposition of any fine or dtsctpltnary action (g) Enforcement The Assoclatton shall have the authonty to enforce flits Declaration as per Article 9 hereof (h) Acquisition and Disposition of Property. The Assoclatton, on behalf • of the Owners, shall have the power to acquire (by gift, purchase, or otherwise), own, 16 Z -20 19965 2 • hold, improve, build upon, operate, maintain, convey, sell, lease, transfer, or othenv>ISe dispose of real or personal Property m connection with the affairs of the Association. Any transfer of Property shall be by document signed or approved bytwo-thirds (2/3) of the total voting power of the Association. (i) Loans The Association, on behalf of the Owners, shall have the power to borrow money, and only with the assent (by vote or wntten consent) of two- th~rds (2/3) of the total voting power of the Association to mortgage, pledge, deed in trust, or hypothecate any or all of rts real or personal Property as secunty for money borrowed or debts incurred ~) Dedication. The Association shall have the power to dedreate all or any part of the Common Area to any public agency, authority, or utility for such purposes and subject to such condrt~ons as maybe agreed to by the Members No such dedication shall be effective unless an instrument has been signed bytwo-thirds (2/3) of the total voting power of the Association, agreeing to such dedication. (k) Contracts The Association shall have the power to contract for goods and/or services for the d~schazge of its respons~biltt~es, subject to the limitations, tf any, set forth m the Condominium Documents. (1) Delesat~on The Assoc~ahon, the Boazd, and the officers of the Association shall have the power to delegate their authonty and powers to committees, • officers, or employees of the Association, or to a manager employed by the Association, provided that the Boazd shall not delegate rts respons~bihty (i) To make expenditures for capital additions or improvements chargeable against the reserve funds, (ii) To conduct heanngs concemmg compliance by an Owner or his tenant, lessee, guest, or mvrtee with the Declaration, Bylaws, or rules and regulations promulgated by the Boazd, (m) To make a decision to levy monetary fines, impose special assessments against mdrndual Condominmm Umts, temporanly suspend an Owner's nghts as a member of the Association, or otherwise impose discipline, (iv) To make a decision to levy annual or special assessments; or (v) To make a dec><sion to bnng suit, record a clarm of hen, or mst~tute foreclosure proceedings for default m payment of assessments (m)Secunty The Association shall have the power (but not the obligation) to contract for secunty service for the Common Area • (n) Appointment of Trustee The Association, or the Boazd acting on behalf of the Association, has the power to appoint or des>Ignate a trustee to enforce t~ _ -Z~ 19965 2 assessment hens by sale as provided m Section 4.10 and m Cahfomia Civil Code (o) Lrt~gation The Boazd of Directors has authonty to file a snit against Declarant, or file a demand for azb~tration, for alleged deficiencies m design or construction only after getting the vote at a duly noticed and properly held membership meeting, of two-thirds (2/3) of the members other than Declarant Amendment of tlns prov~s~on shall require the vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the Members other than the Declazant (p) Voting The Assoc~ahon, or the Boazd acting on behalf of the Association, has the power and the duty to exercise all voting nghts accorded the Property under the Master Project Restnctions, which voting nghts shall be exercised by the Board on behalf of the Association m a manner which, m the Board's sole discretion, enhances the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Project; (q) Master Protect Restnctions. The Association shall have the power and the duty to cause the Project to comply with the Master Project Restnctions, and (r) Other Powers In addition to the powers contained herein, the Association may exercise the powers granted to a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation under Cahfom~a Coroorahons Code §7140. ' 5.3 Commencement of Association's Dunes and Powers Until formation of • the Association, all dunes and powers of the Association as descnbed herein, including all nghts of consent and approval, shall be and remain the duties and powers of Declazant. From and after the date of incorporation of the Association, the Association shall assume all dunes and powers, and Declarant shall be relieved of any further liability therefor ARTICLE 6. UTILITIES 6 1 Owners' R~ehts and Duties. The nghts and dunes of the Owners of Condomm~um Units with respect to sanitary sewer, water, drainage, electnc, gas, telephone ec(wpment, tines, and exhaust flues (hereinafter refened to, collectively, as "utility facil~hes") shall be as follows (a) Whenever utility facilmes are installed within the Property, which utility facilrt~es or any pomon thereof ]yes m or upon Condominium Units owned by other than the Owner of a Condominium Unit served by the utility fac~hties, the Owners of any Condominium Unrt served by the utility fac~hties shall have the nght of reasonable access for themselves or for uUl~ty companies to repair, replace, and generally mazntam the utility facilities as and when necessary (b) Whenever utility facilities are installed within the Property, which uhhty facilities serve more than one (1) Condominium Umt, the Owner of each Condominium Umt served by the utility facilities shall be entitled to the full use and enjoyment of such portions of the utility facilities as service its Condomrum Unit • t8 i -22 19965 2 (c) In the event of a dispute between Owners with respect to the repau, maintenance, or rebuilding of the utility facilities, or with respect to the shanng of the cost thereof, then, upon wntten request of one (1) of such Owners addressed to the Association, the matter shall be submitted to azbitration pursuant to the rules of the Amencan Arbitration Association, and the decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and conclusive on the parties (d) Common Area utilities costs and utilities included on a master meter and billed to the Association shall be included in assessments and shall be prorated based upon the Owner's Shaze unless the Boazd makes a special allocation of such costs pursuant to Section 5.2(a) 6 2 Easements for Utilities and Maintenance Subject to Section 2 3(g), easements over and under the Property for the installation, repair, and maintenance of electnc, telephone, water, gas, and sanitary sewer fines and facilities, cable, or master television antenna lines, drainage facilities, walkways, and landscaping as shown on the recorded Map of the Property, and as may be hereafter required or needed to service the Property, are hereby reserved by Declazant and its successors and assigns, until the sale of the first Condominium Unit, and thereafter by the Association for the benefit of the Owners, together with the nght to grant and transfer the same Said easement shall be m favor of Declarant, and its successors and assigns for the benefit of the Prod ect, and for the benefit of the Owners 6.3 Association's Duties The Association shall mazntain all utility facilities located m the Common Area except for those facilities mamtamed by utility companies, public, pnvate, or municipal, and those mamtamed by the Owners as descnbed m this Declazation. The Association shall pay all charges for utilities supplied to the Project, except those sepazately metered or charged separately to any Condominium Umt The Association shall funush dunng normal business hours and such other times as maybe authonzed by the Association, electncity for normal extenor fighting. Association shall mamtam and fight the Common Area and maintain, water, and replace the landscaped azeas of the Common Area, and shall mamtam the parking lot 6.4 Owners' Duties Condominium Owners shall, at their own expense, mamtam all aspects of heating and air conditioning systems (if any) servicing their respective Condominium Units, and all fight fixtures and appliances therein, and pay all utility bells metered therefor, and all connections to common utility lanes. Owners shall have the nght to install air conditioning amts and ducting, and may make any reasonable or necessary alteration to the Common Area to facilitate such installation (and thereafter for maintenance and repair), all at such Owner's cost, provided, however, that any matenal modification to Common Area shall be approved by the Boazd or the Architectural Control Committee appointed by the Board, and further provided that no alteration shall affect the structural or aesthetic mtegnty of the Common Area. Each Condommmm Unit shall have a separate meter for its gas (if any) and electncity, and the Owner shall be responsible for payment of all charges based on said meter. In the event that separate meters cannot be mamtamed for each Condominium Umt, the utilities 19 Z ~ Z 3 19965 2 expenses shall be charged to and allocated among the Condom~mum Units based on the . Owner's Share 6.5 Metenn¢ of Utilities The Association shall pay all utilities metered to a central meter and shall maintain and repair central utilities serving the Project as a whole 6 6 Access Easements The Association and its members shall have nonexclusive easements for ingress and egress over the portions of the Common Area containing open space, and parking and dnveway areas. ARTICLE 7. USE RESTRICTIONS In addition to all of the covenants contained herein, the use of the Property and each Condommmm Umt therein ~s subject to the following. 7.1 Condommlum Use No Condomrmum Unit shall be occupied and used except for uses permitted under local zoning ordinances. 7.2 Nnisances No noxious, illegal, or offensive activities shall be tamed on upon any Condommlum Unrt, or m any part of the Property, nor shall anything be done thereon which maybe, or may become, an annoyance or a nuisance to, or which may m any way interfere with the quiet enjoyment of any Owner's Condommlum Unrt, • or which shall m any way increase the rate of insurance for the Project, or cause any insurance policy to be canceled, or to cause a refusal to renew the same, or which will impair the structural integrity of any building, or which will endanger the hues or health of occupants. 7 3 Hazardous Matenals. Subject to the remaining provisions of this pazagraph and the hmttations imposed by the Assocrahon's insurers, an Owner shall be entitled to use and store only those hazazdous matenals that are necessary for such Owner's business, provided that such usage and storage is m full compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal statutes, orders, ordinances, rules and regulations (as interpreted by~udicial and administrative decisions) and further provided use and storage does not void or cause a breach of any insurance policy held by or for the Association Each Owner shall give to the Association wntten nonce of any spills, releases, or discharges of hazazdous matenals wrtlun rts Condomrmum Umt or m any Common Area of which said Owner has knowledge, regardless of whether or not such spill, release, or d~schazge was caused by such Owner. Each Owner covenants to rnvestigate, clean up, and otherwise remedy any spill, release, or discharge of hazazdous matenals caused by the acts or omissions of such Owner, or its agents, employees, representatives, mvrtees, 1lcensees, tenants, customers, or contractors at such Owner's sole cost and expense Such mvestrgation, clean up, and remed~ation, rf regazdmg the Common Area, shall be performed after such Owner has obtained the Assocration's wntten consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld provided, however, that such Owner shall be entitled to respond immediately to an emergency without first obtarmng the Association's written consent Each Owner shall indemnity, defend, and hold the Association and all other zo Z -2y 19965 2 • Owners harmless from and against any and all claims, tudgments, damages, penalties, fines, liabilities, losses, suits, admimstraUve proceedings, and costs (including, but not limited to, attorneys' and consultants' fees) ansing from or related to the use, presence, transportation, storage, disposal, spill, release, or discharge of hazardous matenals within such Owner's Condominium Unit or m the Common Area if caused by the acts or omissions of such Owner, its agents, employees, representatives, invitees, licensees, tenants, suppliers, customers, or contractors 7.4 Vehicle Restnctions and TOW1nQ No Vailer, camper, mobile home, boat, inoperable automobile or similaz equipment shall be permitted to remain upon any area within the Property No truck larger than 3/4 ton shall be pazked on the Property other than delivery trucks or moving vans making dehvenes No noisy or smoky vehicles shall be operated on the Property No unlicensed motor vehicles shall be operated upon the Property The Association may install a sign at each vehuculaz entrance to the Protect containing a statement that public parking is prohibited and that all vehicles not authonzed to pazk on the Protect will be removed at the Owner's expense The sign shall contain the telephone number of the local traffic law enforcement agency and shall not be less than 17x22 inches m size with lettenng not less than one (1) inch m height and shall otherwise comply with applicable law and ordinances The Association may cause the removal of any vehicle wrongfully parked on the Property, mcludmg a vehicle owned by an occupant If the identity of the registered Owner of the vehucle is known or readily ascertainable, the Chief Executive Officer or President of the Association or his or her • designee shall, within a reasonable time thereafter, notify the Owner of the removal m venting by personal delivery or first class mail In addition, notice of the removal shall be given to the local traffic law enforcement agency immediately after the vehicle has been removed The nonce shall include a descnption of the vehicle, the license plate number, and the address from where the vehicle was removed If the identity of the Owner is not known or readily ascertainable, and the vehicle has not been returned to the Owner within one hundred twenty (120) hours after its removal, the Association immediately shall send or cause to be sent a wntten report of the removal by mail to the California Department of Justice m Sacramento, and shall file a copy of the notice with the propnetor of the public garage m which the vehicle is stored Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Association may cause the removal, without nonce, of any vehicle pazked m a marked fire lane, within fifteen (15) feet of a fire hydrant, m a pazking space designated for handicapped without proper authonty or m a manner which interferes with any entrance to, or exit from, the Protect or any Condominium Umt, pazking space, or garage located thereon The Association shall not be liable for any damages incurred by the vehicle Owner because of the removal m compliance with this Section, or for any damage to the vehicle caused by the removal, unless such damage resulted from the intentional or negligent act of the Association or any person causing the removal of or removing the vehicle If requested by the Owner of the vehicle, the Association shall state the grounds for the removal of the vehicle. 7 5 SiQris No signs shall be displayed to the public view on any • Condominium Units or on any portion of the Property except such signs as aze approved by the Board or the Architectural Control Committee appointed by the Board Signs shall zt Z-25 19965 2 conform to all applicable local ordinances and regulations, and any regulations • established by the Associarion No advertising or promotional activities such as pennants, lights, or amplified sound or music, shall be permitted without the pnor consent of the Board 7 6 Animals No animals, reptiles, insects, or birds of any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept m any Condominium Umt, or on any portion of the Property 7.7 Garbase and Refuse Disposal All rubbish, trash, and garbage shall be regularly removed from the Property, and shall not be allowed to accumulate thereon Trash, garbage, and other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers Al] equipment for the storage or disposal of such matenals shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition All equipment, garbage cans, or storage piles shall be kept screened and concealed from view of other Condominium Units, street, and Common Areas The Associarion shall be responsible for removal of non hazardous matenals, garbage, and waste matena] from the central pickup point(s) No toxic or hazardous matenals shall be disposed of within the Protect by dumping m the garbage containers or down the drams, or otherwise All toxic or hazardous matenals shall be disposed of at the cost of, and as a responsibility of, the Owner responsible for the presence of the same on the Protect. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary m this Declaration, only rubbish, trash, garbage or other waste that is generated on-site at the Protect shall be put into sanitary containers at the Project 7 8 Radio and Television Antennas No Owner may be permitted to • construct and/or use and operate his own extemal radio and/or television antenna or satellite dish, without the consent of the Board. In considenng whether to approve applications, the Board shall consider and give great weight to considerations of aesthetics and umfonnrty of appearance m the Project, and even greater weight to the business needs of the applicant. 7 9 Architectural Control. No Improvements shall be commenced, installed, erected, painted, repainted, or maintained upon the Property, nor shall any alteration or improvement of any kind be made thereto, until the same has been approved in wntmg by the Board, or by an Architectural Control Committee appointed by the Board Improvement or alterations to Condominium Umt mtenors are not subject to review or control by the Committee, but are up to the Owners, provided that an Owner shall not (m the course of remodeling its Condominium Unit), damage or interfere with utility tines or facilities which serve other Condominium Units (a) Plans and specifications showing the nature, kind, shape, color, size, matenals, and location of any proposed improvements or alterarions shall be submitted to the Board or to the Architectural Control Corunittee for approval as to quality of workmanship and design and harmony of external design with existing structures (b) The Architectural Control Committee shall consist of three (3) members Declarant may appoint all of the onginal members of the Committee and all . replacements until the Declarant's Class A member voring class nghts terminate as Zz ~-2l~ 19965 2 • provided m Section 3 4. Members appointed to the Archltectural Control Committee by the Declarant need not be members of the Association A ma~onty of the Architectural Control Committee may designate a representative to act for it. In the event of death or resignation of any member of the Commrttee, the successor shall be appointed by the person, entity, or group which appointed such member until Declazant no longer has the nght to appoint any members to the Committee, and thereafter the Boazd shall appoint such a successor Neither the members of the Committee nor its designated representatives shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant hereto. In the event the Committee fails to approve or disapprove plans and specifications within thirty (30) days after the same have been submitted to it, approval will not be required, and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with (c) Before commencement of any alteration or improvements approved by the Arclitectura] Control Committee, the Owner shall comply with all appropnate governmental laws and regulations Approval by the Committee does not satisfy the appropnate approvals that maybe required by a governmental entity with appropnate ~unsdichon (d) The Association shall not cause or allow any Owner to make or permit any changes m or on the extenor, roof, or structural portion of a building without the wntten consent or vote oftwo-thirds (2/3) ma~onty in percentage interest of • Owners 7 10 Drapes All drapes, curtains, window covenns, shutters, or blinds visible from the street or Common Areas shall be of colors, matenals, and patterns which are approved by the Board or the Archltectural Control Committee 7.11 Liability of Owners for Damage to Common Area The Owner of each Condominium Unrt shall be liable to the Association for all damage to the Common Area or improvements to the extent descnbed m Section 5.1(a) 7 12 PazkmQ, Spaces Pazkmg spaces maybe used by all Owners, their tenants and guests, subject to the use restnction set forth m Section 2 3(d) The Boazd may from time to time adopt rules and regulations for parking. 7 13 Utility Usaee Owners shall not, without wntten consent of the Association, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, use any machine, apparatus, or device m their Condominium Units which uses m excess of 240 volts Owner shall not connect with electnc current, except through existing electncal outlets m the Condominium Unit(s), any apparatus or device for the purpose of using electnc current If Owner requires electnc current in excess of that famished as a part of the Condominium Unit's ongmal construction, Owner shall first procure the wntten consent of the Association (which the Association may refuse to give) to the use thereof, and shall • make all costs of any charges necessazy thereto The Association may cause a sepazate water and gas meter to be installed m the Condominium Unit(s) to measure the amount of water and gas consumed for such use. The cost of installation, maintenance, and repair of 23 Z ' 2~ 19965 2 any such meters shall be paid by Owner, as shall be the cost of any water, gas, or sewer • connection by the Owner Owner will pay to Association promptly upon demand for all such water, gas, and electnc cunent consumed as shown by the meters, at the rates charged for such services by the local public utility famishing the same, plus any additional expense incurred m keeping account of the water, gas, and electnc current so consumed If a separate meter is not installed, such excess cost for such water, gas, and electnc current maybe established and adjusted from lime to lime by an'estimate made by a utility company or electncal engineer. 7 14 Overloading No machinery, appazatus, or appliance or equipment shall be located in any Condominium Umt or m the Common Area which will m any manner structurally overload the building, or m any manner vibrate, shake, or otherwise damage any portion of any building 7 15 Compliance with Master Protect Restnctions Nothing m this Article 7 shall be construed as limiting the additional azchitectural or other approvals required by the Master Project Restnctions and the County. ARTICLE 8. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION 8.1 Pnonty of Mortgage Lien No breach of the covenants, conditions or restnctions, nor the enforcement of any hen provisions contained m this Declazation, shall affect, impair, defeat or render invalid the lien or charge of any Mortgage made m • good faith and for value encumbenng any Condomimum Umt, but all of said covenants, conditions and restnchons shall be binding upon and effective against any Owner whose title is derived through foreclosure or trustee's sale, or otherwise, with respect to a Condomimum Umt 8.2 Cunng Defaults Subject to Sections 4 9, 4 ]0 and 9.6 of this Declaration, a Mortgagee, or the immediate transferee of such Mortgagee, who acquires title by judicial foreclosure, deed m lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale shall not be obligated to cure any breach of the provisions of this Declaration which is non-curable or of a type which is not practical or feasible to cure The detennmation of the Boazd made m good faith as to whether a breach is non-curable or not feasible to cure shall be final and binding on all Mortgagees ARTICLE 9. GENERAL PROVISIONS 9 1 Enforcement The Association, or any Owner, shall have the nght to enforce, by any proceeding at law or m equity, all restnctions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, and chazges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this Declazation, the Articles and the Bylaws, and m such action shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees as are ordered by the Court. Failure by the Association or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restnction herein contained shall m no event be deemed a waiver of the nght to do so thereafter • 2a Z-28 19965 2 • 9.2 Invalidity of Any Provision. Should any provision or portion hereof be declared mvahd or m conflict with any ]aw of the ~unsdiction where this Project is situated, the validity of all other provisions and portions hereof shall remain unaffected and m full force and effect. 9 3 Tenn The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall rim with and bind the Property, and shall inure to the benefit of and shall be enforceable by the Association or the Owner of any Property subject to this Declazation, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of thirty (30) years from the date this Declazation is recorded, after which time they shall be automatically extended for successive periods often (10) years, unless an instrument m writing, signed by a ma~onty of the Owners of the Condominium Units, has been recorded within the year preceding the beginning of each successive period often (10) years, agreeing to change the covenants and restrictions m whole or m part, or to terminate the same. 9 4 Amendments After the close of escrow upon the sale of the first Condomimum Umt, this Declazation maybe amended only by the affirmative vote (m person or by proxy) or wntten consent of Members representing a majority of the total voting power of the Association However, the percentage of voting power necessary to amend a specific clause shall not be less than the prescribed percentage of affirmative votes required for action to be taken under that clause. Any amendment must be certified m a writing executed and acknowledged by the Clmef Executive Officer, President or • Vice President of the Association and recorded m the Recorder's Office of Los Angeles County Notwithstanding the foregoing, so long as there aze any First Lenders holding Mortgages on any Condominium Units, then the following shall apply (a) The consent of at least fifty-one percent (51 %) of Mortgage Holders (as hereinafter defined) holding first Mortgages on Condominium Units that have at least fifty-one percent (51 %) of the votes of the Condomimum Umts, shall be required to add or amend any material provisions of the Prol ect Documents that establish, provide for, govern, or regulate any of the followmg• (i) voting rights, (u) assessment liens, the priority of assessment liens, or increases in assessments that raise the previously assessed amount by more than twenty-five percent (25%); (ui) reductions m reserves for maintenance, repair, and replacement of Common Areas; (iv) responsibility for maintenance and repairs, (v) reallocation of interests m any Common Areas, or rights to their use; (vi) convertibility of Condominium Units into Common Areas, or vice-versa; (vii) expansion or contraction of the Project, or withdrawal of any property to or from the Project, (vui) hazazd or fidelity insurance requirements; (ix) imposition of any restrictions on the leasing of Condominium Umts; (x) imposition of any restrictions on an Owner's right to sell or transfer their Condominium Unit; (xi) restoration or repatr of the Project (after damage or partial condemnation) m a manner other than that specified m the Project Documents, or (xii) any provisions that expressly benefit Mortgage Holders, insurers, or guarantors, . (b) A Mortgage Holder who receives a wntten request to approve additions or amendments without delivering or posting to the requesting party a negative zs T - Z°I 19965 2 response within thirty (30) days after the nonce of the proposed addition or amendment • shall be conclusively deemed to have approved that request, provided the notice has been delivered to the Eligible Mortgage Holier by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested; and (c) The term "Mortgage Holder" shall mean and refer to any First Lender who has given the Chief Executive Officer, President or Secretary of the Association nonce of a demand to be given notice of matters which require the approval of fifty-one percent (51%) of the Ehg~ble Mortgage Holders holding first Mortgages on Condomm~um Units that have at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the votes of the Condominium Units, pursuant to this Section 9.4 9.5 Encroachment R~ is If any portion of the Common Area encroaches on any Condominium Unit or any part thereof, or any portion of a Condominium Umt encroaches on any Common Area due to engineenng errors, errors or adjustments m ongmal construction, reconstruction, repair, settlement, shifting or movement of the building, or any other cause, the Owner of the encroachment or the Association shall have the nght to maintain, repair, or replace the encroachment, as long as rt exists, and the nghts and obligations of Owners shall not be altered in any way by said enforcement, settlement or sh~ftmg; provided, however, that no nght shall be created in favor of an Owner or Owners ~f sazd encroachment occurred due to the intentional conduct of said Owner or Owners other than adjustments by Declarant m the onginal construction. In the event a structure is partially or totally destroyed, and then repazred or rebuild, the Owners • agree that minor encroachments over ad~ommg Condominium Units or Common Area shall be permitted, and that there shall be appropnate nghts for the maintenance of said encroachments so long, as they shall exist In the event that an en•or m engineering, design, or construction results m an encroachment of a building into the Common Area, or into or onto an ad~oimng lot, or into a required setback area, a correcting modification may be made m the Subdivision Map and/or Condominium Plan. Sazd modification shall be m the form of a certificate of correction and shall be executed by Declarant (so long as Declarant ~s the sole Owner of the Property) and by Declarant's engineer (m the case of a Condominium Plan) and, m addition, by the City engineer (m the case of a Subd>ision Map or Parcel Map) If the correction occurs after title to the first Condommmm Umt has been conveyed to a purchaser, the Association shall also execute the certificate of correction. The Board of Directors may, by vote or wntten approval of a majority o the directors, authonze the execution of the certificate of correction. 9 6 Additional R~Qhts of First Lenders. Notw~thstandmg any provision m the Project Documents to the contrary, First Lenders shall have the following additional nghts: (a) Copies of Protect Documents The Association shall make available to Owners and First Lenders to holders, insurers, or guarantors of any first mortgage, current copies of the Declaration, Bylaws, Articles, or other rules concerning the Project and the books, records, and financ~a] statements of the Association "Avazlable" means available for inspection and cop}nng, upon request, dunng normal business hours or • under other reasonable circumstances The Board may impose a fee for providing the 26 Z - ~~ 19965 2 • foregoing, which may not exceed the reasonable cost to prepare and reproduce the requested documents (b) Audited Statement. The holders of fifty-one percent (51%) or more of first mortgages shall be entitled, upon wntten request, to have an audited financial statement for the immediately preceding fiscal year prepared at their expense if one is not otherwise available Such statement shall be famished within a reasonable time following such request. (c) Notice of Action. Upon wntten request to the Association, identifjnng the name and address of the First Lender, and the Condommmm Unit number or address, such First Lender will be entitled to timely wntten nonce of• (1) Any condemnation loss or any casualty loss which affects a matenal portion of the Project or any Condominium Unit on which there is a first Mortgage held, insured, or guazanteed by such First Lender, as applicable, (2) Any default in perfonnance of obligations under the Project Documents or delinquency m the payment of assessments or chazges owned by an Owner of a Condominium Unit subject to a first Mortgage held, insured, or guazanteed by such First Lender, which remains uncured for a penod of sixty (60) days, (3) Any lapse, cancellation, or matenal modification of any insurance policy or fidelity bond maintained by the Association, or (4) Any proposed action which would regwre the consent of a specified percentage of First Lenders as specified m Section 9 6(d) The Association shall dischazge its obligation to notify First Lenders by sending wntten notices required herein to such parties, at the address given on the current request for nonce • (d) Consent to Action. (i) Except as provided by statute or by other provision of the Project Documents m case of substantial destruction or condemnation of the Project, and further excepting any reallocation of interests m the Common Area(s) which might occur pursuant to any plan of expansion or phased development contained in the onginal Project Documents, the consent of Owners of Condominium Units to which at least sixty- seven percent (67%) of the voting power of the Association aze allocated, and the approval of First Lenders holding mortgages on Condominium Units which have at least sixty-seven percent (67%) of the voting power of Condominium Units subject to first Mortgages, shall be required to terminate the legal status of the Project as a condominium project (ii) Except as provided by statute m case of condemnation or substantial loss to the Condominium Umt and/or common elements of the condominium Project, unless the holder(s) of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the First Lenders (based upon one (1) vote for each first Mortgage owned), and the Owners of the mdnndual Condominium Units have given their pnor wntten approval, the Association and/or the Owners shall not be entitled to (A) By act or omission, seek to abandon or terminate • the condominium Project (except for abandonment or termination provided by law) in the z7 = - 31 19965 2 case of substantial destruction by fire or other casualty, or in the case of a taking by • condemnation or eminent domain, (B) Change the pro rata interest or obligations of any individual Condominium for the purpose o£ (i) levying assessments or chazges or allocating distributions of hazard insurance proceeds or condemnation awazds, or (tt) determimng the pro rata shaze of ownership of each Condominium Umt m the Cormnon Area (such ownership corresponds to the Share allocated each Owner as established under Exhibit B , (C) Partition or subdivide any Condomimum Unit; (D) By act or omission, seek to abandon, partition, subdivide, encumber, sell, or transfer the Common Area (The granting of easements for public utilities or for other public purposes consistent with the intended use of the Common Area by the condominium Project shall not be deemed a transfer within the meaning of this clause); (E) Use hazard insurance proceeds for losses to any condominium Property (whether to Condominium Units or to Common Area) for other than the repair, replacement, or reconstruction of such condominium Property. (e) Reserves Condominium dues or charges shall include an adequate reserve fund for maintenance, repairs, and replacement of those improvements which the • Association is obligated to maintain that must be replaced on a periodic basis, and shall be payable in regulaz installments rather than by special assessments (f) Pnonty of Liens Each holder of a first mortgage lien on a Condominium who comes into possession of the Condominium Umt by virtue of foreclosure of the Mortgage, or any purchaser at a forecloswe sale under a first deed of trust, will take the Condominium Unit free of any claims for unpaid assessments and fees, late chazges, fines, or interest levied m connection therewith, against the Condorriimum Unit which accrue prior to the time such holder comes into possession of the Condominium Unit, except for assessment liens recorded prior to the Mortgage (g) Distribution of Insurance or Condemnation Proceeds No provision of the Condominium Document gives an Owner, or any other party, priority over any rights of first Mortgagees of Condominium Units pursuant to their Mortgages to the case of a distribution to Owners of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards for losses to or taking of condominium and/or common elements (h) Restoration or Repair Any restoration or repair of the Project, after a partial condemnation or damage due to an insurable hazard, shall be performed substantially m accordance with the Declazahon and the original plans and specifications, unless other action is approved by First Lenders holding Mortgages on Condominium Units which have at least fifty-one percent (51 %) of the votes of Condomtum Umt • subject to first Mortgages zs 3 -3Z 19965 2 • 9 7 Owners RIQht and Oblisation to Mamtam and Reoair Except for those portions of the Protect which the Association is required to mamtam, repair, or replace, each Condominium Owner shall, at his sole cost and expense, mamtam and repair them Condominium Unit(s), keeping the same m good condition Each Owner shall bear the cost of maintenance, repair, and replacement of all hems within or serving such Owner's Condominium Unit(s), mcludmg the followmg• Extenor and mtenor surfaces of all penmeter and mtenor roofs, walls, ceilings, and floors (mcludmg carpeting, tile, wallpaper, paint, or other covenng), light fixtures, and all appliances; mtenor doors, mcludmg all hardware thereon, fight bulbs, plumbing and other fixtures, furniture and furnishings, air conditioning and heating units, ducts, and electncal facilities serving such air conditioning and heating units. Utllrties serving the general common elements shall be a common expense of the Assoclatlon Owners shall mamtam, repair, and replace the extenor doors and windows of their respective Condominium Units. 9 8 Insurance Obhgatons of Assoclatlon The Association shall obtain and mamtam m effect insurance and fidelity bond coverage m the amounts and with endorsements deemed adequate by the Board for (1) public liability, (u) fire and casualty insurance to cover any insurable Improvements belonging to the Association including common personal property and supplies, (III) fidelity bends to cover losses resulting from dishonest or fraudulent acts on the part of anyone who handle., or is responsible for funds held or administered by the Association, (iv) Worker's Compensation insurance, if deemed necessary by the Boazd, (v) errors and omissions insurance, and (vi) any other • insurance deemed by the Boazd to be appropnate (a) Waiver of Owners. All insurance obtained by the Association shall be maintained by the Association for the benefit of the Association, the Owners and the Mortgagees as then interests may appeaz As to each of said policies which will not be vended or impaired thereby, the Owners hereby waive and release all claims against the Association, the Boazd, other Owners, the Declarant and agents and employees of each of the foregoing, with respect to any loss covered by such insurance, whether or not caused by negligence or breach of any agreement by said persons, but only to the extent of insurance proceeds received m compensation for such loss 9.9 Insurance Obligations of Owners. Each Owner is responsible for insunng its personal property and all other property and improvements within its Unit for which the Association has not purchased insurance pursuant to Section 9 8 above. Each Owner is also responsible for carrying public liability insurance m an amount such Owner deems desirable to cover such Owner's individual liability for damage to person or property occumng inside such Owner's Condominium Unit Such policies shall not adversely affect or diminish any liability under any insurance obtained by or on behalf of the Association, and duplicate copies of such other policies shall be deposited with the Boazd upon the Boazd's request If any loss intended to be covered by insurance tamed by or on behalf of the Association occurs and the proceeds payable thereunder are reduced due to insurance Gamed by any Owner, such Owner shall assign the proceeds of such • insurance to the Association, to the extent of such reduction for application by the Boazd to the same purposes as the reduced proceeds are to be applied. z9 S - 33 19965 2 9 10 Qualrtv of Construction Future improvements to the Protect will be • consistent with initial improvements m terms of structure type and quality of construction 9 11 All Easements Part of Common Plan. Whenever any easements aze reserved or created or are to be reserved or created in this Declazation, those easements shall constitute equitable servitudes for the mutual benefit of all Property m the Protect, even if only certazn Units are specifically mentioned as subject to or benefiting from a particulaz easement Easements referred to m this Declazation shall be part of the common plan created by this Declaration for the benefit of all Owners within the Project. 9 12 Constructive Notice and Acceptance Every person or entity who now or hereafter owns, occupies, or acgwres any nght, title, or interest m or to any portion of the Property is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every covenant, condition, and restnction contained herein, whether or not any reference to this Declazation is contained m the instrument by winch such person acgwred an interest m the Property 9 13 Captions. The captions of articles and pazagraphs herein aze used for convenience only and are not intended to be a part of this Declazation or in any way to define, limit or descnbe the scope and intent of the particulaz article or paragraph to which they refer. 9.14 Effect of Invalidation If any provision of t}us Declaration is held to be . invalid by any court, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions hereof 9 15 Compliance With Law Indemnity Each Owner, by acceptance of title or possession to any Condominium Umt, covenants that rt shall comply with all governmental laws and regulations affecting the ownership, use and activities upon the Property and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Association and its Board from any and all liability, including without limitation attorneys' fees and litigation expense, ansing from or out of a breach of the foregoing covenant. 9.16 Compliance With Master Protect Restnctions. (a) All Owners of a Unit, by their acceptance of their respective deeds, acknowledge that, m addition to being subject and bound by the restnctions and obligations contained in this Declazation, all Owners are subject to and bound by the restnctions and obligations contained m the Master Protect Restnctions, and that the Owners' compliance with or performance of the restnctions and obligations contained herein will not be m lieu of complying with or performing the restnctions and obligations contained m the Master Protect Restnctions In the event of any inconsistency between this Declazation and the Master Protect Restnctions, the terms of the Master Protect Restnctions shall control 30 =3~ 19965 2 • (b) Declarant and its successors and assigns, all future owners of any Umt, and their successors and assigns, by their acceptance of their respective deeds, and the Association each agree to be, and they hereby aze, bound by and subject to all laws and ordinances of the County and all other applicable govenunental laws or regulations and the Master Project Restnct~ons No Improvements or addmon or change or alteration thereof shall be commenced, constructed, erected, placed, altered, maintained or penmtted to remain on any of the real property w~t}un the Property, mcludrng the Common Area, which is m v~olahon of any of the laws or ordinances of the County or any other applicable governmental laws or regulations or the Master Project Restnctions • st I-35 19965 2 IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Declarant herein, has • executed this Declaration this _ day of , 2006, and hereby certifies that Declarant consents to the recordation of the Condominium Plan recorded sequentially with this Declazation and incorporated herein pursuant to the requirements of California Civil Code §§1350-1372 DECLARANT MILLIKEN, LLC, a California hmrted liability company By _ Name Title: \J 32 .L -~j~ 19965 2 • On , 2006, before me, , personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the bans of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscnbed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same m }us authonzed capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entrty upon behalf ofwhich the person acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal (Signature of Notary Public) (This area for notanal seal) • • .~ - 3 7 19965 2 EXHIBIT LIST • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B' SHARES AND VOTING RIGHTS FOR THE OWNERS OF THE RESPECTNE iJNITS • • Z - 3 ~3 19965 2 . EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 3 of Pazcel Map No 16238, m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardmo, State of Califomla, as per Map recorded m Book 202, Page 84 to 86, inclusive, of Pazcel Maps, m the Office of the County Recorder of said County Assessor's Parcel No 0210-082-70-0-000 • • 3 -3~ A-1 19965 2 EXHIBIT "B" . CLASS A MEMBERS Condommlum Umt Usable Square Owner's Votes Footage Shaze Suite lA ],609 6% 6 Suite 1B 2,801 10% 10 Suite 1 C 2,505 9% 9, Suite 1D 2,371 8% 8 Swte 2A 2,433 9% 9 Suite 2B 1,838 6% 6, Suite 2C 1,684 6% 6 Suite 2D 3,545 13% ,13 Suite 3A 2,433 9% 9, Suite 3B 1,838 6% 6 Suite 3C 1,684 6% 6 Suite 3D ~ ~ 1~lu ~ TOTAL 28,244 100% 100 The above sets forth, for each Condommlum Umt, the Owner's Share, and the number of votes per Unit Upon any dissolution of the Association, Owners shall take an undivided interest m the Common Area equal to such Owner's Shaze *The measurements used for Certificates of Compliance for the Umts may differ, as they may not be measured per the same measurement standazds. Notwithstanding the accuracy of the Declazant's usable square footage measurements set forth above, the squaze footage based number of votes and the Shares percentages set forth above are conclusive and binding on each Owner • =-40 B-] 19965 2 • RESOLUTION NO 06-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17938, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 1 47 ACRE OF LAND TO OFOFICE BUILDING (SHIELL BUALDANG) NTO 12 CONDOM NOIUMS WITHIN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT (SUBAREA 18), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 5TH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN. 0210-082-70 A Rentals 1 Bob Gallishaw, Inc , filed an application for approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17938, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The subtect property is within the Empire Lakes development(Subarea18), and b The application proposes to convert an existing, vacant professional office budding into 12 condominium units, 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b That the design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d That the design of the condominium subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and ~-42 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-33 SUBTT17938 -BOB GALLISHAW April 12, 2006 • Page 2 e That the Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f That the design of the Tentative Tract Condominium Map wdl not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision g The proposal is compatible with the obtective, policies, elements, and program specified in the General Plan, and The design or improvement of the protect is consistent with applicable General Plan; and i The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 17 Development Code, Chapter 17 22, and The proposal promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City 4 This protect is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth • below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) A copy of the proposed Declaration of Plan for Condominium Ownership for Building 3 of the Milliken Corporate Center which will apply and which shall include an agreement for common area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees anticipated for such maintenance, a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a project, and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit 2) Tenant's Right to Purchase As provided in Government Code Section 66427 1(b), any present tenant or tenants of any unit shall be given a nontransferable right of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a price no greater than the price offered to the general public The right of first refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later Engineering Department 1) Provide on Sheet 2 of the Tentative Tract Map the following • ~-43 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-33 SUBTT17938 -BOB GALLISHAW • Apnl 12, 2006 Page 3 a) Provide on top the same information as shown on the top of Sheet 1 and add below for office condominium purposes The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS u T_-'-~ `~ 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW BUDGET PAID 02 State of Cal Itornia BUAGET WORK9AF.ET Department of Real Estate RE 673 (Rev, LO~.DRE Approved Form ID B 623002ap0p02 AI4~saI - -- _- - ^~ GENERAL INFORMATION This budget is a eaod faith catimate than plans P~~to California Clvil Code. If that budget is lei than 1096 or(>,reatcr construction andlor mmplodon (tor new projceu) or hnm a than 2055 from this budget you should txrnleci the Daperonart combination ofplare and/a site inRpcRlons (for exisdng of Real Estate- The ruasocialion logy InctrnRe or decfrase rtg prof ecb.) for ociStmg proletts. (hero may have been hictpr_ budget. it is typrpl for costs to inereavc w the project ate, - tcal data as support for some line iteere, but changes to the 7Te eswciatlon should conduu a rt§ervc sdMy at2ri ib fact protect may make hisrorleal dam not apphcabk ar lekabtc y®r ofoperation m edptst trio reserve fl7ndirrY plan ~ any This budge was prepared for flu purpose of obtaining a dutngcs whidr may have taken place during tonsWaion pubik report The esaoivation mart adopt a budgM in atzordenoc with DREFlf,E M1MDER (IF KNOWN) ~Masta DRF Fdc tl ~(7~lJrY ASSIGNED (IF KNOWN) _-- - -- _ __ _ __ `- 9UBrNVr810N IB6N1'tPICATn7N AND l-OCAIiON -~ - NAMCAtJfMpRTIinCFMfMaOt .- - -.. _.__ ..- _- -. _. ...- _._ Mlllken Corp. Center _ _ NAMF, 70 D2 USLT)MADVERTISnW(IF INFFERENT TtW1NAMa OR 7RACr NUMBERI- -- -- -- - I,EGAI.OFSCRfFI1lpJ I t9ndG('2pE: -- _-- -- ~ .__. Traot Tract -La FiCG - ~ - -- -- Sbetsts: srneer AODRFSS im nnv> - I}I Giir ~ couN'rv MAIN ACCPS9 ROAD(S) -- I NEAREST 7UWN~CITY --- _- -~MII,ESIpIRBLTION FROFf Cr7Y • - ~ ~ L-_ --_ I-_ - 7Y-e OF SIIaNAV1510N ~~ a Condaminmm _ CondominiuroConversion 91OCIC COirpe}afiK _ Stock Cooperative Ctarvcrston _ Limited Fqutry Housing Corp. f - ~ PlaMed ihwcbpment Planned Dcvelrrymart land ProJea Planned DevclopneM Mohile Home ------ill Communlry Aparvnatt Out-af•Sbu Undivided Interest L- Undhidcd Interest lend NO OP WT9NNrf5 _~PHASF,N TAI N IH PRM3(T T PIOUS DRE I•n.Ea rl)F ACREB -- - 29802 1 1 _ 0.23 - - ---I---- I ---•- - -- •-~--- •- Bt7OOB7' PRB~AReA NAME -- -. __ -iATTENItON S~IFPNOTrE DGW Budget Preparation Barbara Welder (949) 234.1899 ADDneas - --- -- -- Icm . - -- zlFmoa - 30230 Rancho Viejo Rd., Ste 206 _ LSenJuariCapistrerlo 92675 - - - ~~ 1 dnclan underpe+ra!!y of par/nry dm the rtrpresrntmlore midanseers m gauhan In !Aa dxwroer and o!ldoermarlr.n,Mslard as a porn of the honrearner'e hadPe! orc our amdcnmykre le lho Avr! gfmy knarohdgat and bellgf. 7ir underN~ slap carlyim. then lMt elechonfe reoaslron nJhR6Jwm a]3 eomWnea!learr the aan.,nJamra!lon os av~ORE apprmtdjonn /DY B1Jaa700NM1] SIGNATURE OF BUIXIF,?PREPARF,R -_- - - -. ~DATR --. _- - ~ -- -- -- -- -- -~ -- 06-Feta10 -- • EXHIBIT C T_y 5 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW ]~JI)GET PAGE B3 RE 613,DR E Approved Form lD N 6230040DB002 - -- - -. __ __ Page 1 of /5 IMPROVEMENTS WORKSHEET - ~- - -- '-- • if this phase will have any line rtrnts shown on pages 3, 4 and 5 hereof exempted from paymart of essessmcnte under Regulation 2792 16(c} +rsmrisk those kerns on pager 3, 4 end 5 end list eny paetially deferred cash on a eeperate sheet showing calculations and mtarA. All escmpttd improvemerds must be voverod by reasonoble ttrreogemerrls for complctron, Include Plaruted Cnnshttction 3tafement (RE 611A) for review, I. Numbcrof bulhdirtgs containing reakkmial oohs 2. fiulmated wmplaian date for the ttsidentiel units included rn this phase 3. Fstitttttted completion deft for the wmmon area and facikGa incloded in ffiis phase 4. Typeofrurdmtielbuildingforthrsproled(uc.,high- riac, cluster. garden, etc.) 3. Type of cotbhmcUtm far these buildings (r.c., sled, con• uete wood flame, toe) 6. Type of roof (i.e., shake. ere.) 7. Type of paving used fn the pro)ea 9 Type of extotior w¢II &r rcsideatlal buildings 9 Numbaoftcvidrntiattmitsperboilding 10. Number offloors per truilding 11, Number of bedrooms per unk 1Z Rquerc Rrotagc of units (list number and sac of cash unit type) i 1 1 Plan 1A (~ 1809 s.f. 7 -F'Tan~ ® 2801 ~ s.~- ~ Pro 1C _ ~7 0~ s.f 1 ~~1I~-~ 2371 s.f - 1 Plan 2A _ Q _ 2433 9.f. 1 Plan 28 _ ~ 9838 s~ ~ f' aTn ~C- ~ 16&4- s.7. - 1 Plan 2D ~ 3E4 1 -~Tan~4- ~ ~~ s~ ~ ~n ~~~ (~- 1638 s~- ~ Plan 3G (~ 1 8~ s.f - ~1 ~ PIan~D ~ - _ '33b3- s.f. 13 Type of parking feel Ildes and numbs of spaces (I e , daached grtraQC tuck-render, subtcrramm~. tarpon, open eu.) ...... ..... .......... Centp/ere II arA/SjwP&attd Cmedoedafuns Projects Only 14 Have you aubntitted budPds for ail phases to be compkpd within the next thrx ealerrder yams tend a hditooi bodget7 .... . ...... .. ~~ Yq ~ No 1 S. Hthis condnmintttm prtJed irrvolvp phesing wilt a single bt submit a budget for each phase plus a budgd which will he used if fututt phases arc oat oompldtui (Commonly rcfcrrcd to as a worst txse budget) • PHASE: 1 O6-Feb-10 Z-~~ 02/23/2006 11:49 2341890 lk"aW BLID(~T PAGE 04 RE 623~ORE Appmve4 Porn lb H 6230020013002 - - - - - - - -page 3 of I S _ - -- 8UD!sET Sf71NDiGf11X . PI3ASENUMBER DATE OP BUDGET - - -- - - - "- -rpREPILENUMBF,R - •-- -- _1 _ _ __ _ _ O6-Fats-10 NUMBER OP UNITS I TRACE NIJMBER/NArvtG OP PROICCI' --- - - - - I- '- -' - - - - 29802 Millken Corp. Center PcrSQ,Fl I rorcf rord __ -- -_ I PtrMonth Monehy- I __ Mnad 100 F7%ED C08T6 •-- -~ - - - TI - -- -- -_ _- _-. 101. Fropctty Twos -_ -_ - -- I = -_ ~ - ~ - - 10x, COrpOtffimnFranchiscTat:ec i - - - _ _103. liRUrarrre (attach prcPosaq _ 002 683 _~ - - -. 10a, Local Lrcrnve R Inspection Fep ~QQ~I ~ $U~ - - - 103. Estimat0a Iocomc taus I- _. ~- ~ - 100 -SUBTOTAL 0.0237 j 708 I 8,480 200 OPEIiATRrIG COSTS I -_ _ --_ xAt Eleeblefty (attach work shttil _ _- -_ ~ 0 04001 _ i,isi l ia,2b8 _ aox c~ (umra, ~k sn~) _ --.. r - - - - - 203. Wetea (attneh work shttt) 1-~~ 1~ ~ 1~~8 204 Sencr/Septte Tanks (include if not In 203) ~ ~ - 205- Cable TV/Masta Antenna -- zo7. cu~toa~1 area 3605 -- - _ _ _ _ fl OfRe5tr0oror _ -6I - 0.0438 _ 1.30tl i 1b,&00 • Rr4b. $0.36 208. Landscape Arse; FLAT SF: •~ 50.15 SLOPE SO.D7 FUEL MOD, $0.03 DRY F.M. 50.01 NATURAL - EXtRA9_ -- - ~ -~- 209. Refuse D~Sposal Vendor Name & Telephone Number ONOTASSOCIATIONEXP6TISE 1- x10. Ekvaton - _ - Numbal~Type _-1 _O.OWOI -- -208 _.2.600 -- -- 21 I. Ptlvste Streetr, Driveways, Parking Anse - I -- ~--- ~ - _ Atyn: ,JI. 212 Hcafing & Atr Condttioning Maintenmroc - _ Arta. -- ~ 38051 0.0010 _ 30 ~ 380 No. Pools- x13. Pool Star ~ ~ - NO 3pas• SpaS{a- ~ - - Months Heated; --, 114. TenniA Cotttts•Numbcr _ ~ ' _- - 215 Access Control: Guard hrslday: I -t p ofMotoriud Gates: 'type of Gape: PHASE: 1 O6-F~b-10 - t-~~ 02/23/2006 11:49 234109(3 DGW BUDC~T PAGE B5 RE 623:DRF, Approvod Fonn ID tM 623002(106002 - _ - - _ _ __ Pcye 4 aj/J Per SQ,F7' r Tara! - r Tuaf - • - _- - - - - - - -- - - .- _ l Po Math I - MoerGly _- I _ Aarm! - 21fr, Reserve Study -- -- I - _. j - -- - - - -- - -2 _~- , I - ._ _ ~ _ _ _ 17. MtacclLvtootu •_. _- _. - -_ --_ -•~ ~-Minor Repabs -- - • --,- _ ~ -- 0- - ° - -- -- _ - __ _ -. - - - ~ 100 1,20b _: ~ _ - _ - - -= Pest Cunanl A -- _. l -. ~~ Dt~$ I~-• --- 7~L - ~ = Malta smciation Dues _ - Oth S & D - - ~ - 0.0783 - ---~ _ 2~~5 - X17,300 - ewer er ram Linos -' - - -- - - _ - - - --Odic Peyphooe - Other Lighting Mairdenanx •-- - - __ - ~ - -' - -a p ,- ~Y _- -- -- - 0 100 1, 200 ~ - - - Oher• Firscptinkla Mainttatana & Monitoring - - 200Si1BTOTAL - I(~ -I ~_ ~6 ---'0 187 _ r200 ~- _ 2,40(f . 0 $,572 ~;$~ 300 RESERVER - 301.313 (atrach work Sheet) - -.- -_ - - I 0.0208 I 820 7,446 3gasusTOTAL - - ~ 0.0208 _ 8201 - 7.446 401. Merggvrrent A -_ -_402 Legal Scrvlceb - - - - 403. Accounting --• -- 404 CAacadoa - •- _405. Mixellaneous atAce expense ~ - - - - -- aoosu6TOTA% TOTA 4 (] DO-400) - • - I - 0.0188 I 500 .. 8,000 - - - ~ -_ . 0_~~ ~ 6~ X00 S00 CONTIIVGEPIICY _ S01 New Canstnktlon 795 - _ 902. GonvenionsS% -- -- - 503. Revrnuc OfPxb (aaegl documentation) TOT.9L ~- DRI: rc$afahons albw the u: of vatiabk assessmalts agalrtst units ooh If one unit wlll derive es much u 10 permnt more than another unit m die value of common goods and Services supplied l+y the association After deurmmmg the percent of benefd derived from sedvsccs tsmwded (page 1 S) by the assaciadan, an easy ahazt to R>tlow would be: Lass than 1095-cgnal assesrnenw From 1095 - 20%- vanable or equal Over2095 - variable assSCSnxms The budget and management doamrnrs Indicate, (CCxk appropNatn boxp Use equal acsacsmntm _X - I Use variable ussec5mrnb PHASE- 1 ~ -- 0.0190 ~67 800 _ _ 0.2505 I - • 7,4t3't ~ -- 8 ,600 _~ _0:0075 _ 224 _2,888 -- I ~• 0.2581 7.6911 92.2t3R rt- The tmvttary and gtrwhttea used In the ptcparNon of this budge ere normally derived from plans cornpletad pAor to conrtruchon and tttay vary alighNy from actual field conditians. The oaleuittlcd budget Is a good faidt esbttmte ofthe pmjechd costs and should be deemed c than one year, The Beard of Directors should conduct an annual rcvlow oflho Adsoeietion's actual rnsts erd rsvise the budget tuwrdiogly. O DopendurR span the lave! of tarvfCl releeted by the AddaGlahprr, rtre amarrni /haven may be Ir+~IC1FM Id cover tke cart and maybe lYgfrer. OFaFeb-10 Z -~~ 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW BUDGET PAC- 06 RE 623_DRE Approved Fonn ID $ 61300200B002 Page 5 of I S _ __ _ _ _ _ rrR~~ES6R[~SWOR_KSIIE'~ -- - - - -- -- - -- DREFTLENUMBFR .- rC(NnMBFJtR/AME -- -- - - -_ - .- - --' • - ___ - _ - - _ II TMnf~llken_Corp. Center _ ~~^^ -.I ~ ~ ®O) ~ I lt1a~ --I YFaily Na¢rve I -- [mr _. P+ I Negpnf~ L('r,(wa 1+7 Pa G1rN -.. _. _ _ -. lle~ Sq Pm I 7Wi C.ar ~ Re ucrnem a nwnMr HOA A6nrm/ (aY I+fr v!.{ I P~~iNxYh I I maim _ _ _ _ -19~bs r -off, --- -- -~ - - _ 2,e; Ti -_o o~8d1 Woad Srdmg (painVstatn) - -~ - -. type• Buih-u ROOT- - F --- ~ --~.~34I _ 0.2~ -~ - -I 1~$7~ ' ~W56 Ronf-type; 47a ~ "' ~Wa~o HeakrB _ _- _~ __ _ ~ - _~ -~__~_- ~- - ~---1= _ ~F,hterlor Ltghts I ~ - ~Floors. type, Carper _ ~ 1~`J1 L-- ~45r -- I _.- ..- --6~7' ~7 I Flaxe- typo The ~- - ---~'Z~, ~ (f~ ~- -- 4g'~ ~j01~ Ekvmors _ -. _~._ .-. _l - 1,200 - _-~-- - _t-200~~_0034 -Streets & lkrres -_ _- I - -~ r`- _ fieartng & Coolm& I _ ~ _300 ~ - ~_ 0.0~ I Pool Raplaster T -- I - - II Pool Heater _-_ _- ~ -~ -~-- ~---~ ~+- -- - POOI Filter `~ Spa Re-Plaeer _- ~ ~ _-~- SpaHeata -- -----h~ - -• ~ -- Spa Hl~r - ~ ~ -~ PoOUS{re Pumps_Nn - - Tmnis Covets _ _ ~Ishmgs/F,quipmmt _' I ~ -_ - ~ • Fences (ropalrhaplace}Type ~ ~ ~ - - _ -wady (Paint) -~ .-~ - H'~a1~61fepeir/Rpt80C) Wrought Iron (paint) SF Wrought iron (rcpeidrpl-) LF jl-- 4Vtotors-type_ - ~ ~- Iv1oWriYtd Gies ~ I - ~ -- -' -- - ~~ ~ I-- -- - ~ - --- - SepticTank I - ~ - Other - -- --- -""r ~ ~~ J }-~_-- Other - ~ --- - -- { .._.. -- - -- -ONar;- - - -~ -- ---~ .- _~ - Other. _- - -~ _~ __ fod,Or - - -- -L-- ~ Z'OTA~-,R~SESVE ~ 7,A46 L- ---b~~2 Nou: Ror space parposes, we have included only toe sompona((h most frequently found in commoMntenatt suhdlvisiona, Reserve IMms should not k Iiroited m Nis Bst shore, but M talYred M your parNwler project . PHASE: 1 O epeNcWyrWmiOan, OB-FB~10 -~~ 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW BUDGET PAGE 07 R6 623_DRE Approved Form tD N 621002008002_ _- -. - -_- -- _ p~ 6 ajlS -_ • GENERAL PROJECT INV,EN7IDRY • Complete 9ohcdules 1 through 6 below, dwt transfer the totals ro 3itc 9ummttry area, • Fttquently several hmldmgs will be repeated in a aubaivtsion, These may be cwnbmed on one line Whernvcr eddttronal spatt IS rcqulred, t>mch corrtputehoneon a separate ¢1CR SiPE SUMMARY - TOTAL SUBDIY4910N AREA - 0.228053 atxp s 43560 = - 9_934 yawl Square tceE 1 Building(s) footprint 9,934 s.E PLAT s.f. 2, C,eregw or Carports ~ s.f SLOPE _ ~ S.L 3 Recrcatianal thciihies ~,~~ s f FUEL MOD. - s f. - - 4. Paved wrfeuce - a.f. DRY F M. - - s.f -- S. Rgtieted eomtnon ands s.f. NATURAL e.f. - 6.Otha(etrochdesariptlon) _ s.f. PRTYD _ -- __s.f Sub Total (I.6) 13,539 s f, Prcv, Phargs) _ s£ • Total 9ggare Feet(from aheve) 9,934 9.f. Subtract Sub Toml (t-6) . 13, '~ s,t. Remoleda= Landrevpe arm =(3,b`~ s.f. Total Landscape arcs s E INDNIDUAL SUMMARY SCHEDULES i. Bu7dfagsContelningUnits Deecnpbon Area of Ao q( Toto! Area Lexytlr x Wrath = Each 811(¢, f BuildlrrRr Sgvore Fad Bldg A Irregular x - 8,934 x 1 9,934 Brg 9 -- - x - •- x - e - -- - Bldg C- - - x _ ~ - x - _ - -- Bldg D __ __ _ _ x - _ - _ - x __ _ Bldg E - x - - - x -- - _ - BI~. -. .- x - _ •- x -- -- _ • - -- Bldg G -- - x --- - -. -- - x - - ~ - - li - • x •-- - --- - x •- ~ - -• rotaljarSLntmaryhaniabara 9,834 2, Multiple Detached Oateges end Catpats x x = - --- - ~ -- -- _ -- x -• • - _ -- - ramr jo, Stunnmry ftmr ?above • PHASE: 1 T -50 06-Feb-10 02/23/2006 11:49 2341896 DGW >~JDGET PAGE 88 RE 623,DRE Approved Form ID h 623002008002__ - _ - Page 7 of lS 3. Reacatlonei Padlitla - - -- -- -- -- - -- - • a. Common Area Lobby. bathrooms and hallways Total Area iLencrh x width - rwa! sgaare jeu) Irregular- x Irregular = - 3,895 --- 9,605 s.f. b. Pools Numb¢r Six: - -•- - --- - -- s.[ c Spas -- - -- - -- - Number Sfae: - - -- s.f, d. Trams Cour13 - - - - -. Number Size: - - Sarfon Type. _ s.f e Other (dacrib~ -- - -- - s.f - -- -- - - -- s.E -- -~ eTdal jar 5ununary loon 3 atone ~Jf s.L 4 Paved Ales (streets, parking. tvelkwaya, asphalt, etc) -- -- (length x width = square jaot area) Paving Maurial (Concrete,Asphalteta ) --- x -' '-- - - - x e - x --- - _ -- - - TdaljorSanunaryNanlabove t.f, 5- Rcstrleted Common Areas Use (patiq etc) Descr(he and attach aalcalotions Tiitel jar Sanrmary~ Nern3 above aL 6. Othm- Dcsaibe and attach caleulatlons Terdjor 9anrrney Nan d abmnc s f. PHASE: 1 0&Feb~10 Z -5 • • 02/23/2006 11:49 2341890 DGW ~.IDGET PAGE 09 RF, 623,DRE 4ppmved Fotm iD fl 6230070013002 _- ___ __ __ • ~- •__ F¢~ 8 of 13 • ROOFR,P,4ERVF K'ORASIYEET (See Pape 75) - Building _ - O I - Flat Aookd Arcs _ r ~ SShingled Are0. {~ CemenN9pmdeh Tilo --- - - -- -° - - _~ I or Wood Shake Atca 9.934 _ -- - •- - - I--- --- -- ~ -- - -- -~- -- -- - -~ i.._~ __.~ -- - ~` _- -- -- -~-- -- -- •- - •-- -- ~- I- -- ~ - ._ _ ~ _ - 77Dttfr~ 9_934 _ ~_-- - ~ - Modiflci_HOaa _ -I _ x 1.14 x ~ z - 1.14 x • _ -- GrcndT ~ 9,934 -_ -Ill' - ROOFP/TCNTi1BL6 _ Phch I Rise Multlpller One Eighdr 7" to 12" 1.03 Onc Stxlh 4" in 12" 1.D6 Fivc 24tlts S" kt I2' 7,08 One Quarter 6" m 72" 1.12 One 7Litd B" in 12" 1.2 Oee I IaIF l2" is 12" 1.42 Fivc Eighths 13"in t2" 1.6 L Three Quertcn 18" in 12• 1.8 - ^. - _~ J O Take aree9 of all buildinga Ilsted m Sections f,1, and 3a. Add 6°/, (¢ 1,06 multipFot) !breach foot oftnofovdhang. In eddltlott, ac~ittat for mof pitch based upon the table below The table Converts hot{zantal ores W roof arra • PHASE: 1 O6-Fe1~10 T-52. 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 OG41 BUDGET PAGE 1B RE 62] pRE Approved Tmm ID d 623002000003 Page 94f 1J PA7M/[!yC WORXSfiBET ---- -- -- EXTERIOR Eramor painting arcs is determined by toeawnng the structure to find the pcntoGer (total dr8tstice aroondJ and rnuhiplyiag that by 10 for tech stun. Use a separate lirx: for each story d• the eenfigmation of the building changes ttom story to story (jw wrnod eldlag sa lrea 30l In lira Carr Manrm/) Buildu{gs (lndudegaragey xexallnn baildr~ ~ypegfSurJttee Prrrmerer x lOfi, z kofSrartu x Mgf9ldg. - TamlAxa stucco - -. 380 x I O R x 3 x_ _,1 = - --- -- -- x l0 R x - ---- x - -- - . --- - - __ x I O R x - -. t - - ° -_ --_- __ x 10 R x x - - x 10 R x -. x --- - ._.. - -- - x 10 R x ~ x - ° ----- •- •-- x IOR. x -- -- x -- _ -._. -- - x 10 R x -_ x ° - Tore! dail~ng IeinlAxo galls L1marFeer s Hrigkt z Agjstdra O = TetarAxa x 3 x 2 = _ - x ~ 5 x ~d °i-' - - x - ~- - '-_ -- x --- •- -- - Tarp/ Wag PalarAxa ~ - Total EsYOior Pplnl Axe INTERIOR Interpr painting rescrro is determined by nloazurtng the room paimeter and molt Rnwn Tppe Wills z 8Jt - Wa!! + arecrrµ Pa/ntrra Area 500 x 8 R . 4,000 ~ _-_ - - --- x 8 R = - + x Rft - + -- - - -- x 81L = - + FENCE9 Fence requmrrg paint of stain (tee Item 312 in manual fm wood and wrought hon.) Compute cepetelcly udng higher cost - put oo sepmatc line on page 3 of the R WOtksltca. Lrrrear Foer r Xe(ghl x 2 Q - Taal Area x 4 x = --- x - ~- x -2 = --- - -- x 8 x _ -- - x 2~- z --2 - _ -- - ~ Tole! Frace PaiatArm Always multipb by 2 to coves the area for both sties of the wall or fenco stained only on one side. adiust your eolculasions and make appmprisie PHASE: 1 I -5 11,400 - 'i~,~00 = 11,400 ng by 8' and adding caling arm Csll/ng . (Lerrxrlrx R'idd~ x 3,605 - -- X _. - _ - - x ~ - _ X Teta! Interior Prnat Aran EXTERIOR AND INTER1pR If the wall m fence will be painted or mton on worksheC. 08-Feb10 • • ToraJAxa 7,605 _~~ ~~ • 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DG4J BUDGET PACE 11 RE 623,DRF, Approved Form ID y 623002008002 E.LEG`7'RICAL ENBIP~ONSUhlP O IirORLSIi~} pogr JO sj15 --- -- A. Lighb (see Note ~ ~ ' li (number ! tax -~ al Igh ava,cge wall par ltglu per monM x atYrage nuarber ofhoara in uae ptr Jay x.09 = KWHper mantle I. Interbt Ligfits (hallways, lobbies garage, stairnd~ etc.) 32 x _ 160 x _ 12 x nn3 = 1,152 2 Oaragc Light9 bt Ctittsidc Buliding Llghts _ - - x -,- - x x 0,03 = 3. Outdoor Gghls and Walkway Lights - --. x - ---- x - -- x 0 03 = - x - -- x x 0 03 = 4, Street Lights I ~ LF.,ISED -. - * - -- - x _ * o n~ - _ B. Elevators (nambar ofeabr x numbarJJoor aropa par mb s f 67 KWH = /<'IVJ/par monN~ _ ~ x 3 x 1ti7 KWH = - c~1 - - - G Trnnis Court Lights (mrmber ojcotntt * 1 D00 KWX = ICWH per mantlt) • _ x 100(1 KWH v - D. EleetrlcHeating - tt12J KWHx aq.1? heaad = KWHprr month for warm dlnoleaJ (!7 63KWHx xq. f} hcared = KWHper monlhjarcdd clbnalesJ -3,605 x 0.25 901 E. Hot Water Heating (3Y0 KWHx camber gf40 gafloa tank = RWHper aroroltl 320 KWH x _ !),33 t 106 - F. AtrCondittonittg (rmarberojsq JL coolads.3lKWFl-KW/lpermaathJ - 3,605 x 3aKWH = 1a~ O.EleetricalMntots(sceNotes ® and ® 1 (horsepowarx wattrx hoary of uae par days 03 x % of jYm in uxa =1~W//parmoyl~ M°t°t l -. _ z z x 0.03 x __ _ __ _ Motor 2 x z x D.03 x ~ - Mntor 3 _ x - -- x - ~ x 0.43 x n ~ --- - Motnr4 ` x -- x -x 0.03 x r - AMWr 5 _ _ z x -- -x 0.03 z- -- _ - -- ' - •- - - H PooVSpa Heeling _ (N~+~ 4/healers x KWN ralfngx hours ofda/ly use x 30 dayo = KWHpar mondtl z - -- x -- x 30 days = TotaIICWAi°esMaag6 3 8~~ • _ PHASE: 1 , OB-Feb~10 T-sy 82/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW BUDGET RE 623,DRP. Approved Frma iD d 62300200B002 __ _ -_ L rout Monthly Cost (!Deal KWNpcr month a reh per iCWH - tWd coal) PAGE 12 Page ll af15 ~_ - __ _3,886 r f_ 0.80 - S ~ 1,166 Momhly conmwn mctcr chargc f 25 Tout Monthly Cost S 1,191 Utility Corr4wry Name: SOUtherTl CalifOfnfe Edrstxl Telephone Nurabc (y14) 635 - 8200 Nader O bo not include leascd lighter ltustrad use kax egcement with rate sehcdule with budget work sheet Put II monthly ohergc na0 Ikm 201 leased lighter USC a mloimwr+ oC 10 hours per d~ average usage Tar exterior lighting. II ®Motors are found in swirnming pool Dumping systems, clwlating hot water sYanrtrs, ventrlation systems bt subterraneM gauges, srx~b' Baaec interior hdlways, and interior stairwells end also to pnratc water II 5yskms and fountaitrs. (Hours of use foe pool pumps - sa Item 201 iu the Coat Manual} A Nommlly 1,000 watb pcr horseptnver should bt used. Cheek plan nn molar or menuttotuezra speaifice. tiorts. If wattegc Is not lGstcd, it ten be calculated 1>y muldplying amps z units, II PHASE: 1 O6-Feb~tO • • • Z -5 5 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGId BUD(~T PACE 13 RE 623.DRE Approved Form ID 3 627f>D'100B002 -•- -- •- •- --- -- -- -- --° - Page J2e~'JJ • GAS COIVSUJNPTTO;V WORBSAE'.ET 1 WaterHanar9 (number ojdrallntq anftr on axextatfon maters +laardiy ranau * outdoor rhowero +rccrealrour rooms - onto Therma bar roirtr x 2~ 17rermd = Thenas per moruhJ _ + + + - 2. Pool (sccnote O below) --• (JYTUra;ngx hears ofdo;ly un x MJ(J3 x 96 ofydor !n uae - iTrerw) Pool tll _ _ _ x z 00003 x % Pool Wl - - x - ---- x 0.0003 x --- - ex ' -- wader =- x _------- x 0.0003 x --'7(r % . - • -- J. spa (number njspas (by xlra) x therms r{mRr - Therms Lard/ Spagl Spa82 _-- - -•-- (g'diamcter) x 300Thetms -' -- (10'diamdra) x 3JOThemt9 '-- -- - (12' diaaxter) x 400 Therms 4 Central Heating (DTUratfngxawmgehoevrojdoilyusrx OfMJ=Tlrermeamd) x x 00003 5. Other (eumbrr oJgar ha,•.bacaer, JFrrplatrs, eet)x J = Therms x S (therms r ruts - menehfy charge) Tolol ~~ --- x - $100 - S Megr Charge f Total Moathy Cost $ UtdhyComparrvNamc: Telcphane Nurttlxr: ~ The prewmption is a tectmtion pool wdth heating txluipttxrrt wall ba u9ed all year a I (qSG. Far very hot orcold clLnatrs where a heater will not of satmot be used all year, s 70% usage will soffiee Lass then 70Yo uaigc will require a Special Nate m the Subdivistan Public Ropott • PHASE: 1 OB~Fe~7O -L. - S 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW BUDGET PA(~ 14 RF, 627.DRG Approved Furm Ih 16230!)2008002 - -- - -• -- --- -- --- --- -Page 13 oj/S- --- WATER AND S,BWER WORRS,F,iEET A Dome+ne (eue only tf tur/L are billed rhrotigh acraelanon) (number of umu/welw/e rac reonrJ x ro1e/JI)0 CFs /0 ^ Water Cast) _ -- 3• x _- $1_20 x to B. lrrigedon (sec Note O ) (bndscape areox mrc/1l)D CFx _OIr133 = Wc4r Cart) --_ - x -- $1.20 x ,0033 C. Secures (sec Nate A ) (Charge per unit per month x rrombc tmhs ^ Sewer Cost) 5 x mm eltemate oelculation (%of A sod B. eta) (A) x f4 D. Meter Charge $ST,pp 1 of meteB - --~ Ltnc Siza 2 (2",3°,eta) Charge ptt month Mnafk(y Wmn Calf Utiltry CamparryNeme: TGryhone Numbs. water Cest S 38 -S °S °a - a 8T - S 93 R^----_-~T- _.~~ ~- II Naa O Average usage cs four • aerC feet of water pa acre of landscaping perycer. This formula is based vn four II II acre feet of saga Same areas Nkc tha low dexrt will use g to 12 -acre foci per acre Of Imd~tpitlg per I` ysar cod the •B" figure should he adjusted aeonrdmgty, (examplo, 4 x flguro fbr B - 14 • aar feet) ~ A If some other medwd of billing is sera for the sewage charge and/or tlris wilt not be a eommon expenre, provide a letter from are sanitation dr.4net end or weer company (whichever applkeble) whtcA eo smtaq. PHASE: 1 06-Fts~10 =-57 • 92/23/2886 11:49 2341898 DGW $1DGET RE t113, ORE~ipnrm~ed Fam 1U s 613Q996B013 PRORA170NSCAEAU,Z;R WOR/i.S9EET Section l Variabk Assaameot Cowpotatlaa A Variable Cosh Descnption Monthly Cost 1. lnxurenu S 683 2. Domestic Gas (if ootmtmo) S - - 3. Domestic Wtttcr/Sewer S 4 Peint f ~r -- ~. Roaf S _ 6. Hut Water Hector j 7. ikFa S -- --- ToW Variable Cort f 92iS B. Total Iht+ble square footage of all onus from coadam(nium plan; C. VarisbleFactpr (vertaylemonth/ycana/sgawefoorgge=roaria6kJFsctor) Multiply this factor by each unit size blow in Section tlt Scenon P Equal AseeunentCompohtion A. Total Monthly Budget S _ 7,691 leas Vanabk Caste S Total Motitlty Equal Cosh S ~ ~~ B Moothly Brae Assesstmtc S 023 (aotn! momltly cnrl/nunrber ofwilrr = monthly 6arc osrearoarnlJ Section IO Aasnaroeal Sehedok Pttite 14 of IS PAGE 15 28,244 0.0326755 Utar S(ro s varlab/e Fntor = variwbla + paae ~ Twa(Monthly x Unit Tde! Monthly .fsaeumenf Asurament Asteument Count Badge! to 1,808 x 0.032576 ° 52.41 + 753.06 ° 805.48 (1) 3805 IB _ 2801- x X2678 - --J7.24 + X53.05 8~t.29 (1) - --~~4 tC _ -~5 x 0.032 76 - ~.b~ + ~~.~i - (1) -`- $836- ID 2,371 x ~3~ _ _ -~7.~4 + 7,~~i (1) ~83b 2A _ 2,~ x _ O.b 6 = - 79.28 + -'~53.0~ = 892.31 (1) ~~ 2B _- 838 x 0.f)'.)25J'8 = - y$.87 + 753.85 - ~1~.92~ (1) _ ~~ zC _ 1,88~d- x 0.032576 = - _ 54.88 + 753.b~ _ ~ ~~ (1} X08 2D 3,545 x Sb 3257 _ ~15.d8 + 753.05 _ = 888.$;1 (1) ~~ 3A - 2,d3~ x ~3 578 7~~ + ~.85 - x.31- (1) - 832 3B X38 ~ x _ 0.032576` ~ 59.87_ + ~5~35 ~~2.92 (1) __ ~ 81 3C _1,684 ~ z _~7v g _ _ 64.88 - + - 80991 (1) -- ~ 3U 9,5D3 x 0.03257 1'1~ + - ~ 753 - -'689~~ (1) -887 VERIFICATION OF COMFUTATION9 Total Monthy Budget (Section IlI) -9,957 • TotnlAasavrtentzmrmbaofanlCSOftachtypc. TotalMonlhlyB Udgtx(SectionilA) - 7,6~{ Seetiao 1V -- --- H(glrev !.owes! / Loa+eal - 9(, dusvmaV .lstYSSmen! Asaesmnent D[JJ'ennYa7 $868.53 $805.46 / • PHASE: 1 - $805.48 = 7.8316 06-Feb-10 S-5g 02/23/2006 11:49 2341898 DGW BUDGET PAGE 16 RE 623.ORE Approved Form ID d 623002006002 _- .~ pgge 1J BrlS SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET LANDSCAPE A. Complete ehen and transfer "total Wlldscape cost per year' to line tl208 on page 3 ~cumulethre per phasel: -Type `_ ~Pe,cent~ _ Area -Tnnwl Cost Tois! Cost _ ~~ 11 per S.F. per rype Ground Cover - Lewn Open Spaoe Maintained _ - _-_ ---- Open spaoe Non-Irtigated _~_ ~ ~ -- Openspeca non-maintained _ - --• -- ~acepe RepairlSuppliea - Other ~- - N/A -- TOTAL - ~ - - I 100QR ~ •- _ TOTAL LANDSCAPE COST Pf]1 YEAR B. Please provide information regarding water requvoments of drought resistant plantalareas,lf any, indicate as a percentage of normal or standard watering requirements and provide source o} intormati0lr. ROOf A. N tharo fa only are type of roof, wkh a constant amps tetra across e0 roof surfaces, the following ahert may not neatl to be comploted. When this Chart fs completed, tr'ansfd total m roof Me kem on papa b. Bur7dmg Typa of Rool Wx11A of Quanflry X __ Overhg fnd orhpl - X X X X _ _ _ x - -._~ ~__i _ ~ 'C Pinch ArRiusred X Annul Cost •• TotelAnnue/ Muhip!!er _ S.F. ~ per S F. Cos! _ X = = X - = X - - x = X = = X Tm TOTAL ROOF COST PER YEAR i 8. If a mansard w01 ba/Ia constructed phrase provide the measurements and type of material m be used. PHASE: -5`~ • I~.J .i~f COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17938 SUBJECT: CONDOMINIUMS APPLICANT: BOB GILLISHAW, INC LOCATION: SOUTHWEST OF 5TH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ComoleUOn Date General Requirements ~. 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a ~_/ complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1 The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, ~ /_ architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fde in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Empire Lakes (Subarea 18) criteria 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~~_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. • SC-1-05 ~ S-~ ~ Protect No SUBTT77938 Completion Date All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion, or approved • use has commenced, whichever comes fvst Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all ~~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval in accordance with the ~~ adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map. 6. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 7 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Owners' Association are sublect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or pnor to the issuance of Bwlding Permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Owners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes D. Landscaping For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for _(~ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and . maintained in healthy and thnwng condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 2 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in ~~ the required landscape plans and shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan; c Floor Pian, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; _/_/ • SC-1-OS 2 =-LO~ Protect No SU8TT77938 Completion Date f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and av • conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , SUBTT17938) clearly identified on the outside of all plans h. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Budding and Safety Department F. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTT17938) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Bwlding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable32 handouts 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limded to. City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and • Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). G. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness construction 2 The protect shall be designed tom comply with the 2001 California Building Codes (CBC), the California Fire Code and with RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39 3. Provide compliance with the Calfornia Building Code for required occupancy separations. 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the requved fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A • 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ___/-J- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- -J~- ~~- ~~ _/-/ ~~- SC-1-OS s ~ - l~ Z- Protect No SUBTT17938 Completion Date 7 Provide the required restroom facilities per the CBC Appendix Chapter 29 ~~- 8 All exit components must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (adtoining rooms, ~~ rated corridors, door swrngs, separation of exits, etc ) ~ 9 At the time of tenant Improvement plan check submittal, additional requrements may be required ~_/ 10 Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with ADA regwrements for the disabled. ~~_ 11 A registered architect must sign and stamp the plans H. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Califomia Bulding Code, City Grading ~~_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~~_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the J~_ time of application for grading plan check. 4 At the time of tenant improvement plan check submittal (for construction), additional requirements may be required. 5 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, ~~_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of bwlding permits 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~~ existing buildings where improvements being proposed wail generate 50 cubic yards or more of ~ combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomia registered Civil Engineer. Note on title sheet that tenant improvement plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division d you have any questions about the procedures at (909) 477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED u SC-1-OS a ~ -ly3 -~•~,~„ -, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • ~ - District .,, --- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS February 23, 2006 Fauway View (3) Story Fairway View and 6th St Assume Tentative Tract for Condominium Purpose SUBTT17938 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http•//www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Private Water Supply • 1 The private water supply must be maintained by the owners association as it was originally approved. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Automatic Fire Sprinkler System The fire sprinkler system's riser and the fire alarm panel must be accessible from outside the building by all tenants Please prowde a user room with a 3'0"x6'8" exterior door for access into the riser and alarm room. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Shall be maintained as approved. Prior to any alteration to the approved site access RCFPD review is required Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1 S' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are • a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet Z-19~ c The minimum outside turn radws shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches • f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). ~. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways• Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows• a. In buildings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access ' • roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fue District access to all required openings. 4 Access Walkways. Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings. 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates. Any gate installed across a Fue Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply. a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00. f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second • 2 .i - l~ 5 g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override dewce and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the • locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mecharncal malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6 Fire Lane Identification. Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the mirnmum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan rewew. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be requred for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogerncs • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-Produang Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents . Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Frwt Ripening Plants Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Open Burning Orgarnc Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Special Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations 3 T.,-~~ • Hazardous Materials Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Tents, Canopies and/or Air Tire Storage . Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the faality is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwldmg & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2 Any business that ooerates on rented or leased oropertv which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subfect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property • owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Bwldmg, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FCS-14 Map Recordation RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are regwred on this protect The protect appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is regwred to be recorded between property owners and the Fire Distract The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. • 4 ~-L2~ Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, • favoring the Fire Distract for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. 2. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On prvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 3 Access Control Gates. vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 4. Fire Access Roadways: The fire access roadways must be maintained in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 5 Address: Commeraadindustnal buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated • dunng periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites Hazardous Materials: The applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services Confidential Business Occupancy Information. The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 8. Mapping Site Plan An 8'h" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be prepared by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 9. Please reference the following requirements from the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Comply with all issues pertaining to the Life/Fire Safety of the Building and site 5 T- ~~ 17.22.030 Application Information requirement. G A copy of the proposed declaration of CC and Rs which will apply and which shall include • an agreement for common area maintenance, including faalities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the initial assessment fees antiapated for such maintenance, a description of a provision for maintenance of vehicular access areas within a protect; and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each umt; and H A physical elements report, which shall include but not be limited to A report detailing the condition and estimating the remaining useful life of each element of the project proposed for conversion roofs; foundations; exterior paint; paved surfaces; mechanical systems; electrical systems, plumbing systems including sewage systems swimming pools sprinkler systems for landscaping; utility delivery systems; central or commurnty heating and air-conditioning systems; fire protection systems including automatic sprinkler system, alarm systems, or standpipe systems; and structural elements Such report shall be prepared by an appropriately licensed contractor or architect or by a registered civtl engineer other than the owner. For any element whose useful life is less than five years, a replacement cost estimate shall be provided; and, 2. A structural pest control report. Such report shall be prepared by a licensed structural pest control operator pursuant to Section 8516 of the Business and Professions Code; and 3. A building history report including the following. . a. The date of construction of all elements of the protect; and b. A statement of the mafor uses of said protect since construction; and c. The date and description of each mayor repair or renovation of any structure or structural element since the date of construction For the purposes of this subsection a "maior repair" shall mean any repair for which an expenditure of more than one thousand dollars ($1000) was made; and, d. Statement regarding current ownership of all improvements and underlying land, and e. Failure to provide information required by Subsections a through d in this section shall be accompanied by an affidavit, groen under penalty of penury, setting forth reasonable efforts undertaken to discover such information and reason why the information cannot be obtained 17.22.040 Property development standards. B. A~Plication Requirements. The applicant shall provide the city with a tentative subdivision map in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance and a development plan of the protect including, but not limited to: 1 Dimensions and location of each building or umt and the location of all fences or . walls, and 6 S ~D`1 2 Building elevations indicating the type of construction material existing and proposed; • 3 Typical floor plans of existing units with square footages of umt indicated and the number of units per plan, 4. Location of common area and amenities existing or proposed, 5. Location and dimensions of parking garage, carport, parking area, access ways, and any other on-site area reserved for vehicular use; 6. Location of areas for exterior storage space for mdiwdual occupants; and 7 Landscape plan per city standards, which specifies proposed trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and indicates existing landscape massing. Species, quantity, and sizes shall be indicated for proposed landscaping only; and, 8 Evidence that a notice of intent to convert shall be delivered to each existing tenant's dwelling unit The form of the notice shall be as approved by the Community Development Department and shall contain not less than the following. a Name and address of current owner; and, b. Name and address of the proposed sub diwder, and, Approximate date on which the tentative map is proposed to be fled; and d Tenant's right to purchase; and, e. Tenant's right of notification to vacate; and, f Tenant's right of termination of lease, and, g Provision for special cases, and, h. Provision of moving expenses, and, Tenant's nght to purchase. As provided in Government Code Section 66427 1(b), any present tenant or tenants of any umt shall be given a nontransferable nght of first refusal to purchase the unit occupied at a price no greater than the pace offered to the general public The nght of first refusal shall extend for at least 60 days from the date of issuance of the subdivision public report or commencement of sales, whichever date is later, and, Vacation of units Each non purchasing tenant, not in default under the obligations of the rental agreement or lease under which he occupies his unit, shall not less than 120 days from the date of receipt of notification from the owner of his intent to convert or from the filing date of the final subdroision map, whichever date is later, to find substitute housing and to relocate, and, k. Other information as may be deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. • Z Any other information that the Director of Community Development deems necessary to determined whether the proposed protect is consistent with this chapter • u • S -~ Staff Report DATE April 12, 2006 TCr Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, Assistant Planner, MPA SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423 - CIP REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 3 37 net acres of land into a single parcel for 26 condominium units m the in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay District located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway - APN 0210-081-017 Related File Development Review DRC2005-00585 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This item will be continued to the May 10, 2006 agenda ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE -The design review of 9 professional office buildings (including 2 existing buildings) on 3 37 net acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay District located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway - APN 0210-081-017 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Protects PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Professional Office Park (under construction), Industrial Park and Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6) South - Vacant land, Industrial Park, Industrial Park and Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6) East - Office Buildings (Research and Development), Industrial Park and Haven Avenue Overlay Distract (Subarea 6) West - Industrial Buildings, Industrial Park and Haven Overlay District (Subarea 6) B General Plan Designations Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park • East _ Industrial Park West Industrial Park ITEM J & K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTTM17423 & DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE April 12, 2006 • Page 2 C Site Characteristics The undeveloped portion of the site presently drains from the north to the south With the exception of the existing street trees along Haven Avenue, there are no other existing trees on the undeveloped portion of the site There are no mature trees on the vacant portion of the subject site D Parkins All proposed parcels would be developed with regwred parking for their assoaated buildings There is enough parking for each parcel and approved land use There will also be reaprocal vehicular access between all of the parcels The total regwred parking for the protect is 205 stalls with a total of 281 proposed parking stalls ANALYSIS Parcel Map In contunction with the development proposal, the applicant has submitted a tentative parcel map division for the proposed buildings into 26 "for sale" condominiums The Development Code exempts the protect from the minimum parcel size requirements because it is a master planned development This item must be continued to the May 10, 2006 agenda in order to complete environmental review and the required legal noticing Background The site is part of The Gateway Master Plan that is developed with two existing professional office buildings and amulti-tenant business park A portion of the parcel to the north is undeveloped The Gateway Master Plan is "intended to encourage the development of a prestigious office park and business environment" and assures that "a cohesive integrated development program can be achieved through the design control of the site plan, architecture, and landscaping and protect implementation " The master plan has strong identity and pedestrian orientation wherein buildings are "clustered around plaza areas which are interconnected by walks „ or arcades Further, the master plan emphasizes only multi-story bwldmgs facing Haven Avenue The master plan calls for "sophisticated style" architecture that avoids trendy themes or elements The primary architectural elements, as evident in the existing buildings, "will be expressed through the use of steel, glass and concrete, in contunction with curtain wall, poured in place and concrete tilt-up construction techniques " Main building entrances will protect a formal entrance statement through the use of landscape plazas, architectural articulation of building form, and more formalized landscape planting General The protect is a single-phase development The protect is to develop four single-story professional office buildings, and three two-story office bwldmgs which will front along Haven Avenue The two existing professional office buildings will have a free standing architectural enhancement element that will reflect the proposed architectural style of the proposed buildings The square footage of the buildings will range from 4,040 to 9,228 square feet A Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee reviewed the site, building elevations, materials, and conceptual landscaping plans on January 3, 2006, and directed the applicant to address outstanding site plan and elevation issues On February 28, 2006, the applicant resubmitted the protect with all of the issues addressed as directed by the Committee The Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Coleman) recommended approval subtect to design recommendations The Committee complimented the applicant on their design A condition of approval incorporating the ~,K- 2 Committee's recommendations has been included in the proposed Resolution of • Approval B Gradino Review Committee The Grading Committee reviewed the protect on January 3, 2006 The Committee recommended approval C Environmental Assessment This infill project is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15332 The map will be continued to the May 10, 2006 agenda to allow for the processing of an Initial Study and the circulation of a proposed Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts D CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Tentative Parcel Map S PM17423 to their May 10, 2006 agenda and approve Development Review nar~nn. n585 th ouah adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions DaTreuteman Acting City Planner DC DF/Is Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Draft Reso • - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 - Site Plan - Grading Pian - Building Elevations and Floor Plans - Landscape Pian - Design Review Comments dated January 3, 2006 ution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00585 ~ ~, - 3 LEWIOESLRIP11gV wuES$oR$P.wcELSrvumER one-Q~ oWwen .PFL.CANr c• .~~.,.o. a ENLINEEq `V,m•rto9mR+n: rxc .rtm. veLn WAIEq$EgKE nweGn fLM"+eni{e paixi $Ewffl yFWLE ELEC IpILygNLE Lrc Maxr NI VML WSYgYKE yin RLfpNN£$E/RSE LA$LE RIM$gV EERNCE x FPE PgOIELIM awl EMW'J ~ee/ Aw V N' 4AO V$EOEWJY iIpv 9EMNnINF ~o'Yetc a RELpRO E<$EMFNT$ ~..~- OI:~. wLOe~~rrc rew .,f~.u "s .. ~ ~o e~-~m,.o oe v 9i ~ Y -~: ~~ -==r=- A- - -:~~ - ,~ {' 11A!f~{{_AYg{l _[~ ~ 1 ~f. f -~~ IliA Mq~ pA~YwAY E E h -,.,_~ 6i- ~,~^ --r-~- ~ -~-o- _-=--t=-'~ I rrtaigti_nv uur= TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 17423 FGR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 26 UNITS PROPOSED PARCEL 1 OF PARCiL AfAP NO 9egB IN THE CiTT OF RaNCHO CJCmAONCa COUM1IY DF SAN DERNARDMO SiA i~ OF lAllp)NNIA AS PFR 4AP RECORDED I~~ RpDh W2 OF onNCEL MAPS P1GF.5 J nND } RCC9R05 OF SAID CObN 1Y 1 ^ ~ i CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA I J f ' I~ ~ 1 ~u f 11 O- f '_r!_+ 'i I" 6 I!. ~ t:f gym/ It ~ au.a~o.__ '( ~ I. DRC 200500585 - SUBTPM17423 _ NPCWIiY M1V _ n ~1 {If~'~ A 1{ ~~ ~ fL Fi f i ^ 1 fit ° AE Ii (, ;~ ~ yi .~ - ,I I;~ ...'~ ~ PARCEL 1 _ i f • f' i ~t I .w.c. fe oM I_ .i1 -,_ - .d~ i - a ~ /~i ~ \ tPr q "/ i PXEPMEO6Y AOA0.'IyleA ELgInSeIA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 17423 +. f~i ~: ~:~ °. .::,:. sr~~~m STORE W.VEN EItECUfNFPMR yPli 1 ~~ ~~ -'r..~ +, 1 I ~I 1 I -_~1 ~~ I 1 I +~ i s. ~ " • • ro ecf In/ormenon site plan keynotes o..., i.s.ew m ^ °m r- ° P InIAr" m • ( P 8°a. _ +e nwva. - O.^ .o - - .. ...».e.. 0 u..._.....~......e ~i ~••••• ~] - pP'~f~~~-n~~~ _ 1 _ Ayx.~n/t/°IIIn1x O~TU bw~• I ' a~UILDZnG3 ~~I. - Ul`'.',Y r. ~e~4 eu u "~'~ ~~{7L'~1I1 ~1 ':' 1J ~ I~ ~...A...., _.,q'm. Y'°°.~e ..,... ryn I~ i 1 utlsFl rbal Im ,a 1LfJ-^-._,o'~ --ePl .n~.-'_!.w_"'pl~`~, mr.n _YI .n,~eJ~l i°' Lwo.nmae ~'~:R.G,~.a._~..~........_w le 1 +SF( tlilmq $ CCC P 1 1 i I i 111 1 TOTAL 896fl SF r~Sl II'r~ ~ ~ _--_- rL~ , )->= e wd . _ _.?_° ° 4 1 MWI~~~.wo. rs.p~, .. ~.°............ I' 1 :~ - , p' (cif. ~;~ ~ f ~~II ~ ~ ~ A'~~ 1 Y ~~ '~ r 1 v , ~e~ -F_-~-1 I i UUILpINGB ~ ~IR~ .,I 9l] SF ~ -- - BUILDINGS /' yI WW )f ~ Ius `Itr ~---_ i ~~v-8 .."a i unrPlluma' ...r g~ Sfi90SP yl 71 /O I ._ °! \'f i .1 r wry ~M^-" I~SLOra0.MY) 1- L t ryry 881 I " OUILDINGJ ; In T ]_~IL - ~~ ~ -t~_trTl s 2 it 1',.1~ usvl Flarl •`t~~ 1111 -- -_-_ Lyl~IS a _r i,`~ i W ' i ~ TOTALAl095F J' UILDING }Its -_'_--"'ES_' - _ 5° o "" P 1 ~ ' ~...~-,~.__~ F~ FI ~~, )T99SF "y~~T - ~ -1A,`~` UUILDING) 1 :1~ ~ ~ ~p I 1_i-': ~ I~, Uslnxll L - 1 ~~ JAW 98 1 1 ~ ~ ' ill ~ ~ i I Il~s,w~ R' E ~~ "I I tlBU1LDW IS ~~~Y~"~1~~~ 0/ ~wsx M.O +~ ~~~ eiet III . tl esr I Fbwl § iI y . tl `} .. 1 ijm• nrnsF rzM rMI 1 1 ~V a E%ISTMG 8 ~ , r, ,p '9JI ' TOI AL 91 49 IT1ff11 r~ ~ILDMC2 0 I 1 'I Iu; ~@~%{' ~~y~ x~~~ I rr~ ~, I 1 r"1 r 95839E ~ ~ 9`~ -~ --_{ ~ •~ i ~ful~l+~ o n,n llss08vl a A~`('L1, 1~• $~i~ yl ' I' 11 ,a.,~'rpary~, a I. ., ~~ri P I _ . _ i ~- ~ 43t ,~,,~`'isA' ,yyp. ~ 9f°n~ ~'f'~R,\ ~rl~rn ~ .+L ~s'~`Y ~ . ., gar ' '6' ~~`" ,+ ~, ~Aj~ ,... I ~-r, Y"~ ..:~w ~~-- .. I I 95159E ' .~i / ___- -. I ' ~~ 4 p II Si00.Y1 ~ , r ~3`"/ r ~ ~ J ~~~~(( J, „ - ~ ~ - ~I 1 ~~--a_ i• 1~~ ~ +in ~Qf~ ~ ~~ - ~ l a ~~______ _ ~. II A -r-~ CS `f~~ F li~.~ r A ~~ ... __ A 1r 1tlPPOlEGT DATA . -~Iy .r /- ._.~ .^ -' v(cln(ty map O ./.N4" I AI ~_ f h ~~.. rd nn" nn an a m "" ' ' _r_a STONE HAVEN i ~ - -- - - -- _ - = _ _- - _ _ - __ ~• ~•- ~ _ = EXECUTIVE PARK ~ - - .....M.A... >• .. 61P REAL ESTATE PTUAL SITE PLAN -ALTERNATE SCHEME 3a ~-~"-~" ~ = ~'°~°°°°°' -~°W ~ - ~°""° ~_ ~1 ~~ .i , la l T OF NANUFIU GUGAMONGA DRC 2005-00585 SD6TPM17423 Aeeoslala ErzsNarte ®~~~~ P IMI wNE e4RO B ~wi ~• •w - ° ---~--w•= ~~ ,~:~ HAV_EHN„nYEN!I _ n_e I ' _ TRADEMAiCyPAld(WAY ;I I L -t__ . T--__ kiN3IOr+ nvEgH.E_ ~~ = = .~, ' SECIgN A-A i, _ a.~ ~t I~ - _~.,,.,.-.. d - ~ ~_ :~• ~~ _sECrnwe-R_ a ._ ~~, s~~ r ~-.~ ~~ ~,b ,~.1' ,;~-' ~, ~pH Q_e _ ' CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN Ci2 ~•,n z STONE HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARI( ~ __ _. - __ w.munmv ~_-_.___ ~ o' • ! ~ f : c I ~ f I ~ WI i R,f ~~ €4 t W olrF ~pl~i~e 4~ ~ '~ p ! P t ~ f i g; ~ ,I t Rfi~; C ~: of r f ++ S 51 f S d :: f ~: o ~ I ` _. f 7 t @: r " S ifS i '< i Cfi i 4e a R °: I °~ a ! O pv i tt. :r m! F F F i ~ { a@@ Y5 Cf w 4Bi ~ S4etp 5~~rEfi"1146a[f~0 p~ t{C- .C.• Sf- ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ . ~~ 4_I <~ ~ ~_ ~~(a. ~'~ --- E --,u --- - ---i -_i~~-VI - -~- E EE i ~ i ~ l^J E - O i ~ J I t ^ E s I ~: l-'1---4Eul E a . 6~ ~ ; ~--~ :-~ I _; .~ 9 LL I O O y ~ I yl r' n I ~ Z V' °; I E u ~ m W SV I F yJ ~ a Wo c-~ W ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ( m ~' E C~ C w C m ~ I I IIiO Q ~ i a .Y I ~ E ' ~U Q1 ' I __ ___ _ 111__ _ -~j _ E __ - ~T V V i ml t rc s ° 4 { e 1 R. 4 4 Fa Y • ~ : ii W " • iF 3e~ ,. iag i c:t , ~ C 4 n4H v~( .f E _.~ai ' I i ~-' O G . E I I _ -- - !I _ V 1 p T~ 4$, I, I _i I E ~ ~ ,1 Ix~ ~ I `+ I ;I T ~ ~~! i 1, I I i e E I - _I ~ I~ i ~ ~~I Zi ~ {. ~ i t~ ~ ` I kl ~ f I I ~N I~ k a R~ ^I 'i I i V' io. ~T; ±r I j =i ^ 1, I._ I , °I U { Z ~ a i@ Q ~@ !~ ggW L~ L5 6 L z~ ~ 0 ~e ~ ar Z ter' p ~t ~ 3 m s Z m HI R yl W X `g ~~ ( o1 { i ~Y i ii ~( F ~ ~ ~ ` tl y { } F'. € w i eg WIVE ~~.~I! I'' Pt ~~ f I ' tfil ~' { ~} fS I P ~ J F ~j ~~ r C' 7~ [( g o~~< o i; ~ l ii i = !( QQQ 1 F ~I Y F ~ a: "PFi €FFF ~ P .P~P €€FFF ~l i e ~t F s. { el r . 4 ~ $~ E~~ IYE t F P~ . ~f.}1 I !i!. [; F j [ of p G .... uI000 ~~J~ i -__ ~ F~ .E Yo I -1 /~ 'rl~/ E "{'~ I -~ I~ _, II „ b' I II Isl i r M, -- -1 ' ~ ` I _i ~€~ ' v ~ ¢'' E 0 ~ i x i1 ~ I .1 o~_ -i ~~ rE ~ % N _ v i ~ w N w LI ~lJ I z ~ ^' ~ Z ~ a S y 0 m w .LL -0 W m ? a~ ~J m E E- ~, _G ~-ll ' ---- o I ~~.; ~ ~, _ ______._T_ _ ____ ____ ~f~ ~~ ~ t ~ ( b g t€ o' E F ;e f C i t s z' ~F{ji{P Y ' ' : {~ t ~ to yf Fit EF~tC~eEt tic ~~. J l: I E '~~ ~- . 5 ' I 01- -.,~ -- O J,K-3 ~ I_ I ~e -I cl le~ ~ ~ :I I I~`i ate; I =~- ,. _ 2i I i I^ 'I a I x, ~_ i~ z a a I4/ a i W1 j€` z 0 3N~i I Q ~? Flo Ear; s!x ,~ WI I • IAMB I 7~ !1~ ~~ ~NM v_ 1 ~i :~~ .~ O tI n' 1 - i e~ I I C ~ 1-+. t I -~ I^ ~~_ ~~~ pl_ 1 1 i __ X11 .3 9i I%~ AF- I-~ -- i~--L---- - - I '~~a bm C')^~ _ ~ " ~-- - - _~ `~"° BUILDING 4 MC> _ ,~a~L I __~ i A 1188E ICI FIamI x.181 BF I3nU FbaJ BUILDING ABEAI 8,302 S.F KEYNOTES FLOOR PLAN ~'~'J"' BXELL OFFICE BPACC ~ ON EAGK FLOOR ~ ~ I, ,~ v , Ill rl n, .i. _ _ _ _______ __ BUILDD~G C •FLQQA_E4~~_ YP ER jLL~VEL~A) „~ „~ WE T E4~YAUUK(1 ___-_ ___ ERST•~LEYA 7S4Nll ~~ 1, GENERAL NOTES -FLOOR PLAM _ KEYNO~EB-ELEVATIONS <~ ro:~'-~,~-w-•w f = ~._~ OEKEPAI MOTEB - ELEVATIONB COLOR BCNEOULE - ELEVATIONS (~ T.....+........ ^ U..-... r... ... ~.vrt_.n_ (•J ...~. ... _ STONE HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARK CIP REA( ESTATE FLOOR PLAN 8 ELEVATIONS -BUILDING 4 ___ ___ ____ _ NPA, INC L~QH7M~4F.-YRTIQy1 E 1 -- SOUTtl.E6~ 012~~ l--- 1- I -I IO ~ m ~. f~ it ~. n m ~,` __ ______ TNAS_M_ENCLQSUNE~-OOByIAN 6 LEVA nlQ~~yp (B, 'A B1 (0101 f--- ~`-- ,, -.LI ~ --" _ __ ,~~~ i ,-- P 'I i ~~,1 i _ ~ - I ~ ~ ---- w ? ,~~~~uQxG -- - -_ _ EAST ELE~Q lJ (BJb i-I I I =1 a~ i_ ~ II m ,~, ~F~~- o.- ti) I"s -_- --_"~ +~ ~ ~ o t~{ _ _ t}r i i r~ 1-r_I I I I ~' i r l I II I I III !~ ii ~ BUILDING 3 -{~m 1.11E 6F (NI FNOrI 1,610 9F IL~I Fleerl BUILDING ABEAM 8,989 SF 'O^' 9NELL OFFlCE SPACE ON E~CN FLOON _ ,_ ~~ -: ~ . S~ 1"_-__ ___1E -v~ ~I -i.-~l - t I ~" i ~~el ~_ 1 II 91 .-~p __~ ; I = ~_~~_ .ol ~ ~ - , 181 111 NEYNOTE8 FLOOR PLAN ~ .., .,.~ «~ ..... R .,..., () b ~. ~.. ' OENERAX'NOTES1 ~FLOOR1 PLAN _-_--_BUILNQ,7-(:LQQ~4A~i._LYV._EACH;I~~YEL(Al ^..,..a „~" „'w'. NI ,1) REYNOTEH -ELEVATIONS Sw..k..u J' OENEIIAL NOTES - ELEVA~10~8 COLOR BLMEOVLE - EL_EVATIOMB p ..........n.... ~ a CU -•^ O-••-•~ __ _--_ a.~ro.~wc...ruu a STONE HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARK ~ SEAL ESTATE _„~_~ , M~HPA,,INC,O ~9UIH-E4EVAaWN~ -- ~ - - --~-TtLg€yA?uQn(J • • ~ iq IB I, , --- ~, --- - ~ ~ i ._, it I ~ I I I _ I =~~n }-_-- bm ~m mmo- O~• BUILDING 5 -~ 8,860 S F (LI fIOOU mo-. ~ R Y ,1 6 E)6 8 F Ib,b Flogl l a m BUILDING AREA, 9,174 S P ._{,) ~I ^}__ gNELI OFFICE 6FBC -_1,1~_ ON EeCN FL00 . _ _ _y=1_-_~ ' ~-N 8 - I ~ i ~;f- om mo-- `-Om~ I ~ -~ ~~ I~ I „I~?--~ r,^ ~i T-~ I ql -~ i ee ! - - -- ___ I __ - _ - _ 4-~-?_'__ 4~ n rig -- __ -_~_~- al Is -- ---- __@IH4p_ING 5 • F~OB_PlA~7, TYP ~j1GHlE~ELCA~ -- - NEST ELEy~?!GH© ~ ~ _ __r (j, I ~~~ ~ Ai ~T YJ^ ~m~,l-~"~~m~ng~Vrl _ k =~~~ .! NI ~ ~ - I ~ 81 F ~ I r--r - i - ---- ,, -rNI,== , SQOTH,_g,EVA_T~ONr~ _ ®~KE^YNOTES -.BOOB PUN r [ OEuEKALYNOTEB'^TFLOOB PLAN NEYNOTEB - ELEWITIONB ~ _ OENEAIIL NOTES -^ELemgT,lONO coLOK_bcxEOULe_- ELEVgnoxc p ....... ~...-.. C'j m,,,. .,.. .M..._ U .s.,....., ...._ _._.,.,,~ _ r -W- _ n.K.,..L, -.s___ FLOOR PLAN d ELEVATIONS_ BUILDING 5 `J ar non .w eow.,xr ax.u Fr ~ rcxmiFe rr Foar nn~rEr STONE HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARK qP REAL ESTATE HPA, INC -_____- _-_~9NTiI E1Eyo11~~Qy~p~ V r ~1;ni ,s' (s) 4P~u +1--- _i - - I~I -- -_ '--- ~ = ~ _r+ I Jr ' '1 - 1„ _ ~ I ~ ~~ ' I~ T _ I ~1~ Uli' - i' I I ' L f-y_ I B ~~ Y-I ____ -~--~--~8~ tii i =~ BUILDING 6 --O > ' 1161aY1 1c~J_-I ILDIND ARE rd- i ~~% A1 3,795 S SHELL OFFlCE 6PACF ~ i ~,.,__ 1~ `E ~ I I~ I I I hr ' F ~1~RS 121 86 ,~~ (AIAt :B` IC` DI O91E1 _ _~NwE^YNOtlTEB' FmOORPPLAN ~` n, _. ' OE~NERA^`NOTES``'FLOOR PLAN ___ NETYNO~EB - ELEVATIONS .. OEMERAI NOTES - fLEVATION9 _-BAST pE<eYA olo~ N RT ttaL-~~V ___@QVTHELEY~I. oION~ FLOOR PLAN & ELEYAT~NS -BUILDING 8 COLORCOLOR BCMED~_ELEYATIONB n~ ,,.. ~, ..~ -__ - pm..m1 ..... ... ~_ u,._ O ~-., , .-. -__ _ _ t_l -- _ __ _ __ U~........ e_ STONE HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARK CIP REAL ESTATE _~ ~_ v,. PA, INC WES _.. ~ ~A-o V 1 i C1~ ___________ _BOILDIND7•FLOA$f~AN~ fl~ ~~ ~-•,; °`°•-°~-"•^• -- -we~a~v~l0~ I u9 Im ~cl INl utGl I T T I -- „-~----N -~~-----~ { GM' _ ~ _ ~^^ _~______ '--- e 1 wni' ~ I GENERAL NDTE6 - FL[VATION6 COLDR tCXEOULF - ELEVATION6 _ xo9_i~EVnnoN ~ ---•-- - ---- - FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS -BUILDING 7 ill (t'O { /9) ,Y 09(A, _ _ KEYNOTES _ FLOOR PLAN ~ ~ ~ 1- t r= ; 1- ~ . ,a, - - t~,D, ~ ~~ BUILDING 7 `~-~. ~ " e - m~~ - 1181mY1 ~ i , ~-~' " -- '~ tCk~- - 5--- BUILDIND AREA, 4,880 S F ---r-L~-(c , DENERAL NDTE6 -_FLOOR PLAN .,,„ _ n - P i "~~~- 6XELL OFFICE SPACE ~ ~ ~ YM i T,T 1. I .,-- ' -- I i _ __ ~ ...o. ...... .......- ..... (EN -l~ ~ J i ~ I ,~ e ~ ____ i_~li ~_~- ~ { - 'M _ ~ l I-__^ __I -_ n - if ~~ ___ KEYXOTE6-ELEVATIONS - ~ .r ..-__-__-__ ~, i 1;41 t, -- 8 __-_ 0.9U` l ,........e 0.6 ) e w - ~.........., F ewe ...a.. «~...,..... p ..v...-_, ....-. ~~,.a.,.-,.Y p._,.. .._. ,...~ .....,.,.-~,.._ p ..,,....,,.. m. - ..._- STONE-HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARK CIP REAL ESTAff ELEVATI N D __ souTNW ^a .... a. ~ w „ HPA, INC a 1'P o e F ~~: a r£y.3 1€~ t° .c.. .:, ~r c.. -" ? J, T ~ ~ e F s ~ t i ,1 ii E' ; , ~ i~4 i FC~ F +fp'91~ PE ~ ~l:l i. G~ ~ s 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ i Z li u f # nF ~ ' d W~ 'i ~~~ [ ~~F{~ p ad. ~IE ~ { ~ 2 ~ €i ~i l; j Q ly r~ ~ ~ 1, F ie . °a 'v~ `P 1 B i •G3 1 ~~E .5 `SE esY f ii6 I i ~ ? ~ 1 j iEE ~~ a lx ° . .i : p; i Fr 3 T i~ , a°E I ~ 9g ; ~tP zE $ ;E; ~~ R 7 7 i E f e E ~C a x z ~ ~ ~ ~ SF !€R ~'~~ ~f E i ~ 4 { ) d F ! 3.. 'Sy j d f~ i.,'F~. ~,! 1 i[Ig EeF3 p I ! F E m... S YE 2 ! ~ W s fS ~ e P F' 'EIEC ,f,}} ¢ F i g ~ k FI §s~ F 6 ~~i ~ ~ i o i e {{ { E 6 9 • ~ ~ :d 2 F F- i 9 fl. , : se e, a~ /)f t I tiY f~ sf ` i 9 i- ^ 11', ~ o • 7 la.F ~ . ~ S d6ili a u ~ Q Q ! ~F YYY - , ^ , 0000'JO~JO .Z • _ 2 W g i IEi O ~ ~ p3 f IF I~ ~yy ~ 6I 6 IS " --1 ,'r -___~_ ____-_'_ _ .i---•-_ n __t- .I' I ' ! OI-,^, ' 1 ~~~~~ ^~_ - f E ~' I I~IE ~~ 1 ~' ~ ~ r, ~ , n _ ~ LL !F~ ~ . I I N V^. 1 x~ N U _ V ~ i ' ~ ~ l , y__ E Z _. , ~ W E ~~I~ - ~ - - -I ~ a J i•. ~I ~ O i I I_ ~ f m ?~ f I 0 r E I , .;I -~-Q j i _J m Cr-~ EE C~ a €E ~~ - a i E -~____________________ E I ~ c ~ E ~ ~__~ _ _ ,. ai Q ~~ ~i 1 I ~ ___ ~i-- } __- _____ y- __ T___ R S m) ~U~ 4 O' .W I ~S.~.__ ~% _' c _ .. i ~_. 'm~E ~ ~ 'u"T f Ci I i-i - T I - ~I f ~.I~= <~` c• ~ - J,~c-~y N ,,,,,, ~~--- i~ ., ,~, 1M- '~~ ~ ~ I i ate-'1 =i -,I I1 ~j I I`~"~ lar' ~ .f--- ~,m ~'-' I~~m BUILDING 9 I r- _ H 61ap1 ~. ~' - 9UILDINO AREA, 5,890 S F I _I i _~~ 6MELL OFFICE 6PRCE m' IC1 - {- - I _ ~ : _{pA I „ - - ~r l~ iL D I ,1 I ~ ~'~" , 1 I --- +6 i-- - -~- L M- h)h 1 - (i) ~Ja) lpup} ~gi ~i~ p I ~ ,1 -~Ir ~ ~~ -Cr~> n ~~~~ ~~~ ,C CEIDI .11.1.1 ~t~ 191 DR P _-__ ~--'~ L`~I __--_-_ _ _ ~r -' --- 1 1~ ----- 1 -- ----~- I ~~ 1 ! ~ tl i I ~ , I . ________~7EST~LEV~~I EAST EIF,YAi14N~1 FLOOR PLAN 8 ELEVATIONS -BUILDING 9 ___ NONTILE4~YA~DN{.J • __ KEYNOTE6 -NFLOOR,PLRN _ GEMENpI NOTES -FLOOD PLpN NEYMOTEB - ELEVITIONB tr .. ~...-., ..~ a. ...... Dexexu Notws -~LEV -noxs COLON fiLNEDULE - ELEVNTIONe a.......u ......_ - -_ m,.-.,.. .~ .. ~__ _ p....,, ...... __- O_.. _, _ Cg .. ... ...~_ - - STONE HAVEN EXECUTIVE PARK CIP REAL ESTATE HPA, INC SOUTN_w4~Yo alONl ^ 1 z W u wj J~ z <: ~;_ 6 ~t ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ h ~~ ' i ~i`: it t, ++1,". ~ _ . s 3 ~!~ ~ i' t 3 i !tt I ~t xr a L ~^° 8 e"~~ ol~ _' ,~ 3 4 ~i ~ a ~ a 4 ~ •~ b ~~a U a ~a ~ „gf ~ G ~ °, 0 W >~ U U ~ G ~o i og~ a a_ : L~ ~ U ~~ y s b ~aa ~°a ~~ a o~ ~o ~ U W z =~a ~~:~~ ~Ii1e t W~! ~W III o ~.-f-_~~L._«-.~~~ ~-- ----------- '--- • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Doug Fenn January 3, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17423 -CIP REAL ESTATE - A request to subdivide 5 61 net acres of land into a single parcel for 26 condominium units in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway -APN 0210-081-017 Related file Development Review DRC2005-00585 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00585 -CIP REAL ESTATE -The design review of 9 professional office bwldings (including 2 existing buildings) on 5 61 net acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway -APN 0210-081-017 Related fde Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17423 Design Parameters The subject site is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway The site is part of The Gateway master plan (see attached) and is developed with two existing professional office bwldings A portion of the parcel to the north is undeveloped The proposed protect would create a new master plan Although The Gateway master plan expired, it is useful for companson The Gateway master plan was "intended to encourage the development of a prestigious office park and business environment" and assures . that "a cohesive integrated development program can be achieved through the design control of the site plan, architecture, landscaping and protect implementation " Many of these design controls should be continued for consistency because portions of the master plan have already been implemented The master plan had strong identity and pedestrian orientation wherein buildings were "clustered around plaza areas which are interconnected by walks or arcades " Further, the master plan emphasized only multi-story buildings facing Haven Avenue The master plan called for "sophisticated style" architecture that avoids trendy themes or elements The primary architectural elements, as evident in the existing bwldings, "will be expressed through the use of steel, glass and concrete, in contunction with curtain wall, poured in place and concrete tilt-up construction techniques " Main bwlding entrances will protect a formal entrance statement through the use of landscape plazas, architectural articulation of building form, and more formalized landscape planting The master plan was approved with a three-story office binding in addition to the two existing office bwldings, whereas, the proposed protect features seven new bwldings (four 1-story and three 2-story) To the north is vacant land, and across the street of Winston Avenue is a vacant parcel, to the south of Trademark parkway is vacant land, and to the west across Haven Avenue is an office binding and vacant land The undeveloped portion of the site presently drains from the north to the south With the exception of the existing street trees along Haven Avenue, there are no other existing trees on the undeveloped portion of the site There are no mature trees on the vacant portion of the subtect site The protect is a single-phase development The protect is to develop four single-story professional office bwldings, and three two-story office bwldings which will front along Haven Avenue The two existing professional office bwldings will have a free standing architectural enhancement element that will reflect the proposed architectural style of the proposed bwldings The square footage of the bwldings will range from 4,040 to 9,228 square feet ~iVlrl~~I~ ~' J,1~ -~~ DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17423 AND DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE January 3, 2006 Page 2 • The exterior of the existing buildings will be enhanced to match the materials of the proposed buldings The existing glazing will be replaced with a blue reflective color and metal accent awning, and a stone work will clad the proposed free standing concrete panels The proposed bwldings will have the same materials Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 Site Plan -Only three out of the seven new buildings are clustered around plazas, and only one successfully The proposed Site Plan has scattered freestanding pads surrounded, and separated by, parking 2 All of the buildings need a substantial amount of second primary bulding material, particularly Bwldmgs 3 through 5 which will be visually prominent along Haven Avenue 3 The following enhancements are recommendations to improve the following buildings Bwldinos 1 and 2 a Add a cornice element overhang on the existing bwiding as depicted on Bwidings 3 • through 5 Bwldmgs 3 through 5 a The primary material should cover the entire facade were the sections of the buildings are depicted with the metal canopy element This is especially important were the metal canopy is over the primary entry of the buildings b The applicant must clarify what areas of the glazing is wsion or spandrel c The subtle recesses of the building are negligible and need to be at least two to three feet in depth They are too small in relation to the mass and size of the buildings d Between Bwldmgs 4 and 5, an artistic element feature should be installed on the west end as visible from Haven Avenue This should be incorporated as a strong and aesthetically pleasing pedestrian plaza area e All of the sides of the tower like elements should be glazed This will strengthen the professional office look and, in the spirit of the Planning Commission's instruction, obtain a significant amount of glazing on professional office bwldings along the Haven Avenue overly corridor Bwlding 6 through 9 • a Delete the stone material on the tower like element and replace all of the sides of the tower feature with glazing J,K-~ 8 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17423 AND DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE January 3, 2006 Page 3 b Because of the smaller size and scale of these bwldings, the stone material should cover the entire facade of the bulding sections that are not glazed This must be done on all sides and on every building c Provide either, or a combination of, artwork, a water feature, or seating area with decorative trellis in the pedestrian plaza between Budding 6 and the existing Building 2 Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues• 1 Provide pedestrian connection from Bwldings 2 and 6 to Budding 7 2 All pedestrian paths between the buildings must be of a durable decorative material and submitted to the review committee for review and approval 3 The proposed futuristic bus shelter and shade structure should be redesigned to match the architectural style of the project Label materials 4 The ledge stone material board color does not match the stone color of elevations • 5 Call out the detail materials and color of the decorative pavement within drive entry throats (outside public right-of-way) 6 An enhanced detail of the trash enclosure needs to match the architecture of the project Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised and returned for further review Attachments Design Review Committee Action Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner Doug Fenn The applicant was instructed to redesign the Site Plan and work of the other outstanding design items with the project planner and return to DRC at a later date r~ LJ J,K-\q RESOLUTION NO 06-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2005-00585, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 9 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS (INCLUDING 2 EXISTING BUILDINGS) ON 3 37 NET ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6) IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TRADEMARK PARKWAY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0210-081-017 A Recitals 1 CIP REAL ESTATE, filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2005-00585, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on Apnl 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway, and b The application is m conjunction with the condommwm subdivision of 26 professional office units, and d The prolect, together with the recommended conditions of approval, meets or exceeds all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and e The project wdl prowde professional buildings in moderate size, conveniently located relative to the professional office/industrial area and regional circulation routes m the area, and • f The architectural design of the protect incorporates stonework, reflective glazing, plaster accents, and metal work Each building has 360-degree architecture, thereby meeting the ~,k -2a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-34 DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE April 12, 2006 . Page 2 design goals of the Industrial Park District by providing ahigh-level of architectural design with budding entrances that are well articulated 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectwes of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 This infill project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15332 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, • this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Department 1) Undulating berms shall be provided in the landscaped setback area along Haven Avenue Berms shall have an average height of 3 feet, and final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval 2) Tables, chairs, and shade shall be provided in each employee outdoor eating area 3) A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc , shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 4) Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza They shall be of bnck/tde pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submitted for City Pianner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5) All future bwlding pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion • control Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation J,k - ZI PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-34 DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE • April 12, 2006 Page 3 plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior to the issuance of building permits 6) The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot hghUng fixtures Enaineering Department 1) Haven existing public improvements shall be protected in place or replace, as required a) Condwt and pertinent structures for a fiber optic cable link shall be installed, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer b) Provide a northbound busbay per City Standard 119 at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark Parkway 2) Trademark Parkway existing public improvements shall be protected in place or replace, as required a) Remove the most westerly drive approach on Trademark Parkway and install curb and gutter, sidewalk and street trees 3) Winston Avenue existing public improvement shall be protected in place or replace as required a) Reconstruct existing drive approach to a minimum of 35 feet wide per City Standard 101 Type C 4) Rewse existing street improvement plans to reflect the required additional public improvements a) Existing street improvement plans shall be reviewed for additional street trees on Winston Avenue and Trademark Parkway including the median and Haven Avenue 5) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City, prior to approval of the final map or issuance of budding permit The amount shall be one-half of the actual cost of undergrounding of said utilities fronting Haven Avenue frontage The reimbursement fee is unavailable at this time since said reimbursement has not been submitted yet by Universal Techrncal Institute • 6) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications or electrical) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to map J,K-ZZ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-34 DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE Apnl 12, 2006 • Page 4 approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted umt amount times the total distance measured from existing power poles north of Trademark Parkway to centerline of Trademark Parkway 7) The WOMP dated June 21, 2005, has been reviewed and thefollowmg items need to be completed a) Protect Site Information - Prowde SIC Codes http //www osha gov/pls/imis/sicmanual html b) Project Categories -Additional Category (#8 Parking lots of 5,000 sq ft) This will affect multiple sections Please revise WOMP as needed c) Section 1 2 -Prowde permit numbers [List Tract or Parcel Map #, DRC#, PMT#, and WDID#] d) Section 1 3 - Provide a site plan identifying storm dram facilities and structures, structural BMPs, stormwater flow (drainage), and the receiving water e) Section 2 1 -Complete this section (Gwdance pages available at • Engineenng's front counter) f) Section 2 2 -Complete this section g) Section 2 3 -Complete this section h) Section 3 2 -Complete this section (Use format provided by the template) Section 3 2 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream " /) Section 3 2 - Provide specfications for filtration devices referenced k) Section 3 2 -Prowde all the fact sheets referenced m the table Section 3 2 -Review and revise maintenance responsibility and funding source for O 8 M for reach BMP m) Section 3 3 -Complete this section (Use format provided by the template) n) Section 3 4 - Refer to the California stormwater BMP Handbook • for definitions and specifications for Treatment Control BMPs J, K- 2 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-34 DRC2005-00585 - CIP REAL ESTATE • April 12, 2006 Page 5 Verify whether selections in the table meet definitions and specifications in the Handbook htto //www cabmphandbooks coin/Development asp o) Section 3 4 1 -Complete this section (Flo-Gard Fossil Filters are flow-based BMPs) p) Section 6 -Notarize and record the City's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan " (Copies available at Engineering's front counter) q) Plan Review -Show and label applicable BMP's that are identified m the WQMP on the Grading Plan The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS J,k- Zy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIE DRC2005-00585 SUBJECT: 9 OFFICE BUILDINGS APPLICANT: CIP REAL ESTATE LOCATION: NORTHEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TRADEMARK PARKWAY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Ctty its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Ctty, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-34, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading actiwttes and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDestgn Review approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and gradmg on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the • Development Code regulations SC-1-OS ~ Completion Date / / / / / / / I i \plannmg\final\pingcomm12006 res 8 stf rptWrc2005-00685cond4-12doc doc V, K- 2 5 Project No DRC2005-00585 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business actroity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner • 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect ad/scent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_I_ the number of trash receptacles shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of budding permits D. Bui lding Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from ad/scent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwlding plans 2 For commercial and industrial pro/ects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_I_ budding colors E. Par king and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _I_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide SC-1-05 2 2 (D r \planning\final\pingcomm~2006 res & stt rPndrezoos-oosssconda-7zdoc doc J r k Prgect No DRC2005-00585 Comolehon Date 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Tri p Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided to all commeraal, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher • whole number r vided for h ll b ld b / / 2 e p o ing s a u Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the _ _ _ commercial, office, and industrial faalities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet 3 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided Bus _/_/_ shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commeraal and office pro/ects, shall be speamen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/ stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view ad/scent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of bulding • SC-1-O5 i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & stf rpndre2oo5-oo5esconda-~zdoc doc ~,K- z~ Pro,ect No DRC2005-00585 Comolehon Date All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s¢e shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet m vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted m staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent urigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained m healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertil¢ing, mowing, and tramming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 9 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, speamen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along HaenAvenue. 10 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined m Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits Environmental Mitigation measures are regwred for the pro/ect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 495 00 prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit / / --- • / I -~ /- / / / I -/-/- • -/-- _/_ . -/-/- -/- - ~, SC-1-05 i \piannmg\final\pingcomm\2006 res 8 stf rPndrezoos-oosasconda-udoc doc J,1c - 28 Protect No DRC2005-00585 Comoletion Dale Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub)ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, . f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Pro)ect Number (i e , DRC2005-00585) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect'slEngineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the Ctty pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2005-00585) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department far availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development pro)ect or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may • include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program SC-1-O5 -/-I- / I / / / / / / I / / / / / i \planning\final\pingcommt2006 res & sH rpttdrezoos-oo5s5conda-t~ c~doc J, K -6 Protect No DRC2005-00585 Completion Date deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Budding and Safety Offiaal after tract parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_I_ counter) M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_!_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 7 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed _/_/_ N. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_I_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is requred for all new construction pro/ects and for _/_/_ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ • SC-1-05 i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & set rpc~drezoos-oosesconda-~zdoc doc J,K - 3D Protect No DRC2005-00585 Completion Date P. • •C-1-05 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trell Median Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X X X X X (e) Trademark Parkway X X X X Winston Avenue X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Busbay Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Puli boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer / / / / / I / / / / / / / / i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res 8 stf rpttdrezoo5-oosasconda-'12doc doc JiK- 31 Protect No DRC2005-OOSaS Completion Date Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway to each lot or parcel (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC) The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subfect to City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever cpmes first Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program SC-1-OS • • i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & stf rpndrezoos-oosasconda-lzdoc doc J,k - 32 Protect No DRC2005-00565 6 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation to those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Pro/ect Engineer Mm Common Grow Street Name Botanical Name Name Space Spacing Size oty Haven Avenue Magnolia grandiflora'St Mary' NCN 3' 20' O C 15 FIII Primary Tree In Brachychiton populneus Bottle 8' 25' O C Gal In masses, mainly Tree Informal 15 FIII behind sidewalk Gal In Trademark Prunus bllreiana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Parkway Gal P A Less than 8' Winston Avenue Platanus acerifofia London 8' 30' O C 15 Plane Gal Tree Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clry Inspector Any unusual towcities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Q. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to /pin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be fled with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue R. Improvement Completion If the required public Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an Improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the Clty well be required for Haven Avenue, Trademark Parkway, and Winston Avenue S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required SC-1-OS Completion Date -/-/- -/-- -/-/- -/-/- / / i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & sir rpndrezoos-oosesconda-t2doe doc J,K-33 Protect No DRC2005-00585 Completion Date 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the _I_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be sub/ect to any requirements that may be recerved from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_I_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bulding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ V. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors Ifwindows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used W. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility r~ LJ SC-1-OS 10 i \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & stf rPndrezoos-oosasconda-tzdoc doc ~ , K - 3~1 Pro,ect No DRC2005-00585 Comolehon Date 2 At the entrances of commeraal or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of . protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be incompliance with Sign Ordinance, Including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department 3 All developments shail submit an 8 Y:" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of aliniulti-tenant developments to the Police Department X. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~C-1-OS / ~ / I ~ ~ I / 11 I \planning\final\pingcomm\2006 res & stf rptldre2oo8-oosssconda-lzdoe doc J,k- 35 ~,,,,.~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS November 2, 2005 Stone Haven Executive Pazk (7) Commercial Buildings SUBTPM17423 & DRC2005-00585 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants m commercial/industnal protects is 300-feet No portion of the extenor wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de- sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants aze to be located The preferred lOCat10I1S for fire hydrants aze 1 At the entrance(s) to a commercial, mdustnal or residential protect from the public roadways 2 At intersections 3 On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible 4 As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct 5 A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route azound the extenor of the facility or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided g Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The reginred fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch This requirement is made m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances 2 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire spnnklers aze installed is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per squaze inch This flow reflects a 50- percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire spnnkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 wRh central station momtonng This requirement is made m accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distnct Ordinances 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect maybe used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow Firewater plans are regmred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems J,K-3l~ Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submrt plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to subm~ttmg the overhead fire spnnkler system • plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed m 1 Commercial or mdustnal structures greater than 7,500 squaze feet 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Bu~ldmgs 3 "All structures that do not meet Fire D~stnct access requirements (see Fire Access) 4 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 5 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 6 When any applicable code or standazd requires the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor azea (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the Cahfom~a Bu~ldmg Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standazd #10-6 and/or the Cahfomia Fire Code 2 Pnor to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the bu~ldmg or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building pennrt must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire Alann Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of spnnkler heads, the spnnkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system • FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire D~stnct access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standazd 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1 s` story extenor wall shall be located within I50-feet of Fire Distnct vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the extenor of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences aze deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The mm~mum unobstructed width ~s 26-feet b The maximum ms~de loin radms shall be 20-feet c The mm~mum outside loin radms shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for col-de-sacs ~s 45-feet e The minimum vertical cleazance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any pnvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the dnving surface shall not exceed 12% ~ Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GV W) 1 Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept tnmmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- mches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department appazatus Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows a In buildings without high-pled storage, access shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 Cahfomia Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided m each 100 lineal feet or mayor fraction thereof, of the extenor wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed prov~s~ons shall be made to maintain Fire D~stnct access to all required openings 2 J,k-3~ 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire appazatus access road to all regmred building extenor openings •5 CommerciaUIndustnal Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be m accordance with Ftre Distnct Standazd #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Pnor to the fabncation and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Ftre Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates m service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open honzontally or swing inwazd c Gates maybe motonzed or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of dnve access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motonzed gates must open at the rate ofone-foot per second g. The motonzed gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual ovemde device and afail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motonzed gates shall be equipped with a Knox ovemde key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate m a visible and unobstructed location i For motonzed gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief pnor to installation Brdirectional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the vanous entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distnct standazds shall be included m [he azchitectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be cleazly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit apphcatton for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically descnbed below, which m the judgment of the Fire C}uef is likely to produce conditions that maybe hazardous to life or property • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Hazardous Matenals • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Coustruction Services lans shall be submitted and approved pnor to construction of buildings and/or the mstallatton of equipment ~esigned to store, use or dispense hazazdous matenals in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electncal Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD 15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application J,K-30 Fire Construction Sernces staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire Distnct "Apphcat~on for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation • RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply aze required on this project The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivrded A reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favonng the Fire Distnct to gam access to the subject property The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, burldmg or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distnct Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favonng the Fire Distnct for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the pnvate water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities m general) The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire Distnct The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bemazdmo Recorders Office The Fue Construction Services Umt shall approve the agreement poor to recordation The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office The Fire Construction Services Umt shall approve the agreement, poor to recordation Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire D~stnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnct Standazds Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans ~s required poor to any building pennrt issuance for any structure on the site Pnvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-8 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Sernces will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable poor to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a cleazance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants w~thm a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All reginred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable poor to dehvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushrg Fue Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water • system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road a J,k-3°I 4 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow mfonnation from CCWD and submrtt~ng the letter to Fire CORStruCUOn Services Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway m accordance with the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Engmeenng Standazd Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed spnnkler contractor, m the presence of Fire Construction Sernces, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire Ime contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for h~nng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services venfymg the fire flog+- ava~lable The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow m accordance with the Cahfonua Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Frre Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire spnnkler momtonng system must be tested and accepted by Fue Construction Sernces The fire spnnkler . momtonng system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire spnnkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazazd protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy ~s granted and/or egwpment is placed m service 6 Fire Alarm System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Sernces 7 Access Control Gates Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standazds #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance wrth the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit pazkmg, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who ~s responsible for the required annual mspect~ons and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 9 Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerc~alhndustnal and multi-family bu~idings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, v~s~ble from the street and electncally illuminated dunng penods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with lazge setbacks m multi-tenant commercial and industnal buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (m wnhng from the County) that the facility has met or ~s meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernazdmo County Fire Department, Hazardous Matenals/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Sernces ~,K-yu 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Distnct "Confidential Business Occupancy Infonnat~on" form This form provides contact information for Fue D~stnct use m the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual locarion of all devices and building features as required m the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • • 6 ~,K-~lF T H E C I T Y O F R A N C U O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner gy Larry Henderson AICP, Pnnapal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corndor to Mixed Use with a Master Plan designation, amending the Parks and Recreation chapter and the Flood Hazards chapter for the development of 9 single-family detached residences, 126 multi-family residential units (14 77 acres), and 2 office bwldmgs (3 66 acres) of one and two story design totaling 44,782 square feet on a total net site area of 14 31 • acres located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Design Review DRC2005-00071 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC , - A request to change the Development Distract Map from Flood Control to Mixed Use on a total net site area of 14 31 acres located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Design Review DRC2004-00071 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE'TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to subdivide 14 77 gross acres of land into 10 numbered lots and two lettered lots for the sale of 135 residential condominium units m the Flood Control District (Mixed Use District proposed), located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, and Design Review DRC2004-00071 r~ LJ ITEM L, M, N, 0, P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01197/DRC2005-00001/SUBTT17435/SUBTPM17460 AND DRC2005-00071 April 12, 2006 • Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17460 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to subdivide 3 36 net acres of land into 3 numbered lots for the sale of 2 office condominium units in the Flood Control Distract (Mixed Use Distract proposed), located at the southwest corner of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Development Review DRC2004-00071 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00071 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to develop aMixed-Use protect comprised of 2 office buildings totaling 44,782 square feet for 126 residential attached Condominium Units and 9single-family detached units on a total net site area of 14 31 acres located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density Residential 12 33 units per acre Office is Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 30 B Surroundino Land Use and Zoning North - Single-Family, Low Density South - Office and Institutional (CVWD Egwpment Maintenance Yard), Industrial Park East - Vacant, Office West - Single-Family, Low Density C General Plan Desionations Protect Site -Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor, Proposed Mixed-Use with a Master Plan North - Low Density (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) South - Industrial Park East - Office West - Low Density (2-4 Dwelling Urnts per acre) p Site Characteristics The project site is located in an urbanized area and has been previously disrupted during construction and operation of the existing detention basin Based on a letter containing the results of a Biological/Regulatory Constraints Analysis conducted for the proposed project', no special status species were observed on the project site during site reconnaissance conducted in January 2004 Because of the lack of suitable habitat, the project site is not expected to support any specal status plants ' acreeSan Bernardino County FloodSControlnBasm propertyRocated n Rancho (Cucamonga, San Bee ardino County, • California, April 29, 2004 L_,r1,N I~,~, 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01197/DRC2005-00001/SUBTT17435/SUBTPM17460 AND DRC2005-00071 . April 12, 2006 Page 3 A wetland delineation has been prepared for the protect site2 All areas with depressions, drainage channels, or wetland vegetation were evaluated utilizing U S Army Corps of Engineer (Corps) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) criteria A total of 0 62 acre of /urisdictional waters of the U S was found to be present within the study area Of the 0 62 acre, 0 53 acre is /urisdictional wetlands and 09 acre is turisdictional non-wetland waters of the U S The 0 62 acre area is also riparian/streambed and is, therefore, subject to California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) turisdiction Development of the proposed protect will eliminate the on-site jurisdiction areas Effects to waters of the United States are regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act This permit is required prior to the placement of fill material within any area under Corps jurisdiction Prior to issuance of a Section 404 Permit, a Section 401 Water Quality Permit must be issued Affected CDFG turisdictional areas are regulated by Fish and Game Code Section 1602, which regulates alterations to streambeds of lakes A streambed Alteration Agreement is required for any pro/ect that will divert or obstruct the natural flow of water, change the bed, channel or bank of a stream or use any material from a streambed Initial Studies Part 1 and Part 2 were prepared and it was determined that with Mitigation Measures incorporated into the pro/ect, the environmental impacts have been reduced to an acceptable level If the Planning Commission concurs, the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts would be in order E Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvae of Use Footage Ratio Reouired Provided Residential 207 covered, 270 garage spaces, 84 open 92 open Office 44,782 square 1/250 square 179 185 feet feet for general office ANALYSIS A General The project site is proposed as a future community park in the City's General Plan' The San Bernardino County Flood Control District offered the property to the City at the time that they determined the property to be surplus The City declined purchasing the property, citing lack of funds to develop it into parkland Exhibit III-10 of the City's General Plan also designates the proposed protect site as a proposed community park (Floating Designation) = Delrneatron o/Wetlands and Junsdret~onal Waters, Church Street Basrn, LSA Associates, November, 2004 3 City of Ranch Cucamonga 2001 General Plan, page III-141 L, N1ri~i of~i3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01197/DRC2005-00001/SUBTT17435/SUBTPM17460 AND DRC2005-00071 April 12, 2006 • Page 4 This exhibit states that Proposed park sites and Speaal Use Facilities are considered floating designations until the final location of the site is determined " At the time of General Plan approval, the City had a population of 125,585 residents with developed parkland, trails, and speaal use faalities totaling 549 1 acres and undeveloped parkland totaling 150 acres The City has a park standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents At build-out of the General Plan in year 2010, the City protects a population of 189,123 residents, which will regwre a total of 945 acres of parkland Development of future parks under the General Plan will contribute 232 5 acres to the City's existing total parkland acreage The 232 5 acres of future parkland when combined with the existing 549 1 acres and the undeveloped 150 acres of parkland will total approximately 931 6 acres, a deficiency of the desired 945 acres by 14 01 acres or 1 48 percent Loss of the proposed protect site that is 14 77 acres in size, as a future park site, would reduce the total amount of parkland available at build-out of the General Plan to approximately 917 acres, which is less than the desired goal of 945 acres Although the protect site is proposed as a future community park m the City's General Plan text, the General Plan Parks and Recreation Plan Exhibit III-10 does state that such designation is considered "floating" until the final location of the site is determined Additionally, loss of the proposed protect site as future parkland will not alone result in the City being unable to meet its parkland goal of 5 acres per 1,000 residents Currently, the protect site is designated Flood Control in the City's General Plan The protect includes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the site to Mixed Use The proposed protect fulfills policies of the General Plan including the promotion of residential mfill, the provision of a transition between commeraal and lower density uses, and the provision of a variety of housing opportunities The proposed protect does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection Although the protect site is proposed as a future community park in the City's General Plan, the City declined to purchase the property, and loss of the protect area will not result in the City being unable to meet the parkland regwrement of 5 acres per 1,000 residents, therefore, impacts related to this issue are less- than-significant The multi-family component of the proposed protect includes a pool with a spa faality, tot lot, barbeque areas, open lawn area, and an exerase course/togging path Because the proposed protect includes the development of housing units, it will cause an increase m population of the City, however, because of the relatively small size of the housing development, and the requirement of the developer to pay Parkland Fees, impacts to recreational faalities is considered less-than-significant B Parks and Recreation Commission Reviewed General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 on February 16, 2006, and by minute action, recommended to the Planning Commission and City Council the deletion of the text as shown on Page III-152 of the General Plan, retain the Parks and Recreation Plan Exhibit III-10 without modification indicating a floating Community Park Designation at the intersection of Haven and Church, and, the modification of the Open Space and Conservation Plan Exhibit IV-4, with the deletion of the Basin area as Flood Control C Desion Review Committee Reviewed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 and Architectural Plans on January 17, 2006, and recommended approval ~ / ~'~ ~ -~~ , o, P, y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01197/DRC2005-00001/SUBTT17435/SUBTPM17460 AND DRC2005-00071 • April 12, 2006 Page 5 D Techrncal Review Committee Reviewed and recommended approval with conditions on January 17, 2006 E Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant on October 18, 2005, at the Central Park Commurnty Center The neighborhood residents were generally concerned about the density and intensity of the development proposed and the inadequacy of traffic-related improvements A copy of the meeting notes is attached for reference F Environmental Assessment A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for certification FACTS FOR FINDING 1 General Plan Amendment -The Master Plan and Architectural Plans illustrate the land use amendment and meets the criteria contained in the General Plan relative to Mixed- Use designation 2 Development Code Amendment -The Master Plan and Architectural Plans illustrate the Development Code Amendment meets the criterion contained in the General Plan, relative to a Mixed Use designation, and is conformance with the intent of the Development • District designation contained in the Development Code 3 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 -The plans as submitted and conditioned are in conformance with the amended General Plan, Development Distract Map and Code, and the Califorrna Subdivision Map Act 4 Development Review -The plans as submitted and conditioned are in conformance with a With the ob/ectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the pro/ect site This item was originally scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006, but was pulled from the agenda for a lack of quorum The item was re-advertised for the April 12, 2006 meeting On March 21, 2006, a . letter was received from a resident, Jonathan Ausubel, 7653 Cartilla Avenue, regarding traffic concerns and pedestrian safety The Engineering Department addressed the concerns and a memorandum responding to Mr Ausubel's letter is attached The Engineering Department has L~Nlr~~i~l P rj PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-01197/DRC2005-00001/SUBTT17435/SUBTPM17460 AND DRC2005-00071 April 12, 2006 Page 6 added a condition requiring the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Church Street and Center Avenue RECOMMENDATION Approval of the project by the adoption of the attached resolutions recommending approval by the City Counal General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, and final action on Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, and Development Review DRC2005-00071 with conditions, subject to a 10 day appeal period Staff also recommends the adoption of a Mitigated Nelgatlve Declaration of environmental impacts Dan Coleman Acting City Planner DC LH/Is Attachments Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 Site and Architectural Plans Neighborhood Meeting Notes Correspondence Memo from the Engineering Department dated Apnl 3, 2006 Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Minutes dated November 1, 2005 and January 17, 2006 Exhibit I - Initial Study Part I and Part II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 Draft Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 Draft Resolution of Recommending Approval of Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001 Draft Ordinance Approving Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2005-00071 • • • r 3 G J -' - 'RAC7 9J35 _____________-- - 7RaCi 891A ~ ~; 2 r• r 1 I =1 ~ :'~}~n~ N-rr ,Awli ~ '$5 Y f I I t rt,~ I 7Rn Ci`8570'r I "i :';~1°"~ I ..ra'rLrT'd: 'H }5 P I A`kl. ~~,Y, 1 r :~~d I I ~. _ I 1 PA~aNI I (.z.,SY,,-A- I I .~ ;I ~~~ ~,,- '~ r SITE UTILIZATION MAP SUOTT 17435 and DRC2005-00071 DIVERSIFIED r~~~ C7~ua~cd~ aid adeaB DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC City of Rancho Cucamonga FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO 11435 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIk ORNIA voxnoN or Lor. rAACr MAR No 1zD1 MB 3aifil RELOADS D(SAN BENNAM1pNO COUNAV IULY 192005 'AxUAR~1005 HI4(Af$GADSS ONUMO[A[O LDr llE^e0.(D ~5 IDLY6 IDOR Ir 1v pCA(5 xD Ap0.1L 16 1005 JANUARY 151005 JN )66 19II NADOLF b ASSOCIATES, INC err ~~~ , • ~ , ; ~14a~~s.^ I ~I -. cl Fh.4; k~^ ul. Iri alll At~~~ ~ V,I 4~,'~r,/, „,I {ni ~1' - ~~ ' 1-., kf.J .~'yyc .,I , VICINITY MAP 4 1 F,1 17~ I(1 Au, E~ J ~A°~~~w LEGEND --=-- - ~~ ,.,.A,,. ,;» ,e ~..x,. L> nm me +.wsr• ASST ARCIiITECT51Nc ,. ,~,: ,.. ,~, ,.,,:......, r,.,~„ I ,,,, ,., ~~., „ ..,~.,,..,.,^ I I ~ ~q ' e J(.I i ~ C-' i ~ t\r ll' Y r 1~ i= i~ y I Lel __ _ A 1 I - 5 - -- --- --~I'~ --;,.~- LI f __ .. ~_ _ ~ _ -I ~~_' Cl-IURCH_SIREET~~ -? -mil - --- _ _ _ - • YF I J 7 '"'-~~^Rri'Ip` ~w.r~T^YI-..% ~.... _ ~.-_. ~. .... hP +'II / d i J qFl r 1 I ~ I- I L I ?-'- .p I . T ~ I I'li W ,I „-~' : I u_ - r Ili >m - J Ilrl, L/ . I I i _ _ - d'e - -- -- III ~ .. '~-.~-._{„-~7C;?°~....-;' nl,-~ ~ 'Iv it ~ ~ ry~l I _' vl __ ~ Its ~;~ I I ~ I II ~ °~' 1~-I ~ ~ III= v l W I I- at _ )~ 1 11 I I P I` I- v 1 r ~k I I ~~ I I I~ I 5 I I`.r .I _~. r' r I 1 h_ ~- _ III 6 _ - . I I . _ _ _ _ " ~ • - '$i~ Lor ¢ u~- C5~ I i I 1 I, h 1 of . -~ , . e.. I r .Z.-___~m_____._ ~ 1 1 VIII I III I II I~ % ' $WLE ~ °EC I I I . -~~ _ _ nls coN•+n , ,.... ~ J ..., n^~ ... ervno.Fe ..... p~ CiuL IxCwEFI„ A I SOiIS InQU lv4 ' III y'•~,.,:J Im""<a ~~ \I I ' NEMUNOEP ^CpCEL'f ' ' 1 I _6 p> ~~ II , ' ~ 1 ~1 Ir VIII `[ I' I h II 's ~ I ~ t 'sa ,. ~ I ..: 1_ti?~ ~-_ Lot + V ~.lln_L._~_ _ ~i II _ S I 1', 1I } II I F ~ 196.4 5. 1 C -T~-' _ \ I 4 { ~ "~f~61 I I I I ~' lya` -I [ p I II I I /Iw.rvv in ~I I _ _ III L ~____i~_, ~~~~ `"'` _~ ~ -_-__ ~~ ~~. II .F:.,.... L'rt,nrti:Ily. 'fu'_~. ~II~~ ~..~„1(.- ~~ Ir t i'I I 1 - a' ,,. _ I I F _ I ~ ° + ~ +~ CpVN[L'CWO ~~ y r C[ViU StIIR e ~ M ..n CNUAM SP[R + • 'v.iC.L:L(IgV ` t•'MaL:LC410N ^' °~ TTK.L StRw. ,s• F =~- _ -- 1 ~-N 1 I ~r-~ _I• 'I :a'~;~'~~''~; FN nV{VU[ rvM+L 1lRtlV U~StINL tin![T~YNp~FU(Vi --- -~ ;-- --~ N^nwnmrvtwA. xaw9 mrvLwnrwn cm[i ' ' '"'Y=° ; •-N'° - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ~,r~.^c<'w. rv."~`:"¶`~ SUBTT 17435 and DRQ005-00071 DIVERSIFIED r~~ , DEt'ELOPMEM GROUP • [NiY+NCF O[NTNnY LFxCM NMS 0.6 M ~~ Y^ IIf fOC 5ALG6w[Ni4l CCA0WIHIpN INrty ym R pN FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES d' TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 17435 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICINITY MAP AIB i°."Ei°x"E°<odos ak s:H ecariAaolN2o mLrm IUlY 19 2°05 f'+UMY 2P05 IU24AE5 c4015 OxUNeFB[D W' 2L[II[At0'O S IULY6 2005 u26np[$xEl APRIL 26, 2005 OQOBER A, 2005 IANUARY 75 2005 lx 266 1921 C'h urch and Haven ~- "°°°LE `~5°`uT~,="°-- City of Rancho Cucamonga r<< T= °~~~ • PITASSI ARCHITECTSIr,< . ,. ,,.,ID `, ,., ,,,, ,, . ,~.....,,,,,.,,, . W r J _U ... ' `, • I I ,' I f , ~ r<!_~iU~iJ ~ 11-1(_ ;' ~ ~ ~ i I_ i I~TI ~ CHURCH ST ' __ __.,~____,I _ `- L ~ ~m,~x __y!_~ ~1.L:1_____~__-_ ___ 4 _I I (~ ~~ I ~. _,~ _ I I 1 I, 6 , ` I •e l p ' ~ ~ oARCEI 1 (. n PARCELA ~'~~ _ __ __ _.. 10__.x__ __G__~~ '4b°`.. ACC°;' ~ f', ,f`, . :. .n ~ a, e ea p PARCEL] _____-____~_~„T ~ I . „ ,., ~i~ ~ I .. ,~ - , I 1 __~__.^1._,___ ___ ~ I - _ -~~-- ~ -_ ~j l~' , f , I I r J ~ I a I,~j ~'t I I I alt 1 I , I I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTP 17460 and DRC2005-00071 DIVERSIFI~E//D~~ DEVELOPMi~(.~,/ II 1 I I I ~ ., I I - I ~ , ,. _~. ~___ _. .___ enr -- _~ j • j ~ ~ ;1; ~ 16 l ~ i G SG O; "1 0,; ~ ~, ' T y v ~ I ] I }y l~]f it e ~ I W I ' ~~ ~ ~ I i 1 a ~~SI r ~ ~` ~ ~ I ~,, 3 ~~ . I ~ 11: 1 'jl ~ i ~~ { PARCELS Ir i ~ i ~' „/ I I f l l ,~ I~A n I t(Q Ri l I in rtn u+.[ :ti~~__~~ ___~ C~ ___ _,l_ _ _ _` VICINITY MAP ~w i_ ___ __, __ 1 - _ 1_ I I rvwiu ss o. ,n>+ow...u (i,(i mvl.c seen ~w+ro+euen. // ~ ~i wu+cn sam nwca now. 1Church anus ~Slave~a City of Rancho Cucamonga _ ~--_-_ iy ~.,,, J~:-1 ~s~ ~ c MF+b~ O+ivFV.., I ~" F SYn(y 5IC1gN _..f _-~ ~--J-h- r: { , II I~w- ' D f nrzpm+wivlw..w v - -nc. s=alw~- [vl+.Kf w 1013 (rvG"t_u5 1FOr SALE OfR(E(ONDOMINIUM UNI[$ FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE PARCEL NO 17460 IN ThIE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN 8E0.NARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNI B[ING A $U9CIN$i0N J[ iNE PFMAwDEII >AgCE[ Of T0.>CT MAG I Ta ]$ lUlr if tWf 1J6 a[pf5 t+05f-+O Isp+([.5 oaoen+ tons ah 19 zoos NNI$ 3005 IN )66 1911 PIADOLF •ASSOCLITES, INC , I r~~ ~~.,,...... Ilf PITASSI ARCHITECTS~Y+ II ICI i ~I ~ ' I I I~; I IXISTING I SFD I I I , ' '' '' I " I ' I '' ~:1,~ I ri %~- I r~l%~1,~ '~~yr~~i~l-'!! ,(~/ir/~~ °V/~//1~1 ~~~{I~i~;l('~/1~~~~~~~r~l/~ ~ ~~' III' i II~~~I ~ ~-I_//%;- ~r~ ~\~(~_ 1--_4'~~I ~~\ -~~'/'eeT~`Y/~/n ! ___{ I-"-~'~' "'~J'-_s _^_~~j~ °~~ I~I~I I~•i' \ ' ..._.~.. ~.~. z _ ~~ ~. ~ ~ 7__ ' ~' L ,1 _ _ ~ - may,., __--- ~.___._........__ ,.~.~---~ --~._,......_ ___..-= ~ ~--. ~.~.~___..._.._-.~.~. ~~..:._:y ;~- -- ~ -C-Kurth-.. ~ J - - --- -- - -~- - - ~--- - --- - -3E - -- - -- - --.. ~.--- --°' , - --I , :; ~'P 4 ' •~_ I ~_'- _ _ -__ _ - _ - !~ ~ 11 ~-,c-~_.-rt_a -_1o~9=__ t=^~l _ __; ~~ __~*"~I L,~~_~l~~y II ~ li~h ~rt ~ {r (I- { -I I ^Tf~.=± P--~° II ~~ rf j ~ ~ I ;''j11, r~. {lIII~JN,._.- }}_ `Iri , 105C I~~ Z~ jl.L3.-li~ ~~ I I 2SC'~;li JC ' CSC s,,l :~ -I~r} ~_ i' pp~ I I, lij li I I ill ® ~ ill = zu ' r V II~ ~I( ~ - I A ~;J ~ ~ ~:~i ~ I I"I _j' ~~ ~ ~~I ~~ z L 'I ~ .I ~ II _ ~l ~ ~ r ~ !~'~. i s ~ ' ~ ~ rJ +~ ~ ! i I x ~°' s '- 1C~ I ~, ~. ~ i 'I'i % ~ ~ -- 1 . G ~ --- _-- -- ~- 'JI ' ~ . ~ r - - _- I~ -- - ~ ! ,~ ~ ~ Ir~,~_ " t; i, 3~I' ~ 1 \_..S' IR~' ,~r~'7-J~~~_RESIE3EN~ L- "MIF-~-Ir,,;,~,~,~ 4rp(,f-r j~ ~ ,fir t, ~ i~ P; i• I,,- '; i' II /, s ~ _, il~ 4C ' ~' ~ ~ I . 4 a •: - s'~ ~I ($r ;.~.`r i-~ ' SC~~~ i ~slt ~oFFiCES ~ \ ~ .' I I~ I! ' - I I ' I + ru -' I -~~ ' I~55 1• J' I R~~? _~r~ ~l ~ _ _ -~~~ M~ ~< .~\~~~~ ~~ l~j, I ~ II ~, r i L '--I- ~I_~ f ~.s~_l li .~ p I >, -III sc -„vli I 16 It-i~, I• -_i.,; 'ii ,'!tt-~=>c°`~ I }~,,oc I',~ -- ~ 11 _- ~._~^ ;J 'I I ~,i r "+ I I 1 p ielsc '' u c ~' ,___-fib' v t , a sC 1~, ---- I I '1i f~ ,, I u' I~ ~ 6~C I • I' °~~~~ (`N I ~,t~'-`~1I. 1„ .I~ 11,3 5C {-j' ~ ~ ; I: I ~ 9 ~~~ i'I b C~ ~~~I ' I ~ I I i 1. I . ~ ---e II l 4 ra, I 'I, , II_w CSC ~ ~ I! I .z+,_ ~a ,zC~l nsc I I' ~ ___.{{{__~--,~~,,, ..L--- _z ,` ~ -J -~ ; I 1 ~ I ~ I -~=d ~~ rGREENBELi•, - ,+ y ~ i ~ i~ 'v ^'I I '~'--rte t ~ I~ p ~; I,r I v 6~1~ il~ ~'I Gi I~ Y. I ~~ l I~ , I~I I~ I I - I II'4- r 1. , I I ~ ~~"~~~ 'rt r ,a i ~ I rl w' I II- ac~', ,~ .~ y iL~.J r ~ ~~d' I'iC ~ r 1 SC '` a i.' I ~i°-~_95C ~I; I~ 7C }ij N5N5 ~t~ bI I I' _-.'..,.II+I S I I~ i II ./ ~'I-- _ ~ ; ~ _ ,1_~ / I ,` ,, S-:~ I r r~ ~- t r bl(Ir c; o; r4-~ tl ~i' I I II; `.. J V ~~ L/ I I I'I~n l er _r -`I~ e_ ,;. ~ol~_ i-I- -~:,1`t I L~~~- a Jr~ C~- i I , ~/ ~' ~• III 9~ ~~ ,~~~ r''1n F.l_r'I '~~ - "I~ 'I - __ ~ .I_1 I ~ ' - __ ~~: ~.. r 3+~ 1 ! Lam. _- <d ~+a - - ~Y'.•r~.w->~-trC^~~r%~a, ~. ~iT._'`FJ. .. - ~ __...~..~. ..j'., I~..~.._; i~.71 IJi~ I_f~_i~ 1 ~_~~ i f ~i "II~ _ I "I" ~ . I ___1_ _ _ rieemlock~i I ~ - - - - - - --~ -I I I i~fir a~ -- , I i , I I- I fi I I'~ ~ I I I I I j P[slulmut ~ orecF ~~-~ ,~ i l ~ I i%~~/ ~%,y ~~ III ' I' I 1' I I T I i I I I y, ` I ill ~~' , , ~ Pgp9xd Zme '\,U' MU I ' ~~'l/%/=LL. // r n~' I I~ ~ ~_- - / __- - 'I 'Ili '/r ~ ~ ~' %-1 l ~ !! Nr~Me~area.., 1095 ac ll6 ¢ l _ _- __ __ _ _ j! •, ~~ ~ , re / ~q J ~ I ` 1 y I~ w.,, i u:< ns ~ nm olrsa I ~- - - - - p _: - --_ -- - ~ ~ ~ ,'i, ' I ab M• Bld` i ± not _~ - E- ~L _ (. ~` y ~r` .~ \,\ ~ / i I 9 4 1B o f ~ •/ r ~ v ~ ~ 'III i I C -Cnhm+n Bkai •nov - CVWD ,/\') \' i. ~// C=', i . / tC' ~ ; ~" ~ I I' II sd: ;, na~°a, ue1 ,i ..1 I'~~'ii„ir ~..,il --~/i/i~%~i /~ ~r ~, .'/' >`c v~~, l' I e'I III ~ 1J`ySfdMOflq i ~ i I~ ~~/. ~i, y~j~~~~ '.. //.%%~~ ~i~~r ~. i/~~ %' A~` I( ~ /~ ~~ ~ / ~~ 'I i Parma revved 90' mverM '19 / ~~ ~ ~ \% ~ ' / r / ' B+ open __ Patine pmMM fro corned 1B5 91 npe^ ]6] DIVERSIFIED ~EVELOP~~t DETAILED SITE PLAN SUBTT 17435 and DRC 2005 00071 Church and Haven City of Rancho Cucamonga C~ idBUU110N OF MU04IM11FY 0.E910FNBAl imil vea +x9+69 il er!&g meaae 1NUt,I PamB Cam+ae 16696 d la'drtVe area u1Nx U Pma,e 6oMd wnn 1990 ,I Common Mea 16)pil it 9d5 mn B71 >n +A .~ ~~ o w ixo :oo Nnn 1~ V I7 PITASSI ARCHITECTSINc r.•W,~ .~,r~..w_.~.~.~ - -- f_ -_- _._~~ ~~ I ~I I I~ ---_ _ -~~....4 - -aNlavw -- -- -- -~ -- -tlllLL tlV~- - i II - -ll3NeOB- -----~ i ~~ ~ -- -133 a1S a31NlJ- - 0 L~r"~/~~~~~4~1 5 t- € y, ' _ 'L ~ ,` .. < Z ~E _ ~ 'F r ~ ='~! y t r y~ T ~; J ~. Q ~~ ,, ~_ s o ~ ~ ~ i i S 1 ~ f _ a . 3 _al` _6``4 'o ."%> i7Y -`~ -- `~ if ;t ;ty'g °' o ~ ~'~1 ~ `' ~ o a ~ m U U Q .t+ - " U ~^~I, 6 ~ F ~ C a } ~ (y„y 'i.6s~ A'ii~ ~4. i~ -l--`s4i~~ ii+ ~ rte, ~tt'1 ~£'ECt~ U ~`~l-h~~v n^ICM~^/~/~^Kx~'.C~J l`lcKKl . -;_ 1 ~-a l! S { C i ~ { i ~ W ~- - ~ d 2 f~4 i_- _ 0 U W (~` J `. a ~r_^ ,~ o U V l \~`Y\11v\ ~~ ~ w `~,v O •Y"\ > o Q w 0 N ®A < _ a W ~ O i N I ~ ' I ~_ -C~-_ __-I -_ _ _ _- -- __ _ -_ ~r-~Q {} '- -CHURCH STREET-_ JZ __~- ~ - i+EIALOCK AShIFORD DIVERSIFIED DEVELOP~~D FETT6RE LEGEND C^Q~J 'Y4~.~N. Nom.. ~~ ~.~o-, ~~1 .^. e4~Y ~'..~.~V.`i 4~W~_ CONCEPTUAL HARDSCAPE/WALL PLAN SUB iT 17435 DRC2W5-00071 Church and Haven City of Rancho Cucamonga inxbll ~~h `P<Illlll'YIPF II, , ~.. ,I Ili ~"msin. ^I~... i I -T -I kl II lup I~iP 0 b' I]tlT~~I ]~] xer1~ .- PITASSIMARCHITEC 15 me r~ (~ I 1~ ~' FEATURE LEGEND .nn~om n Lm r AIgACmu(wl. trxnroN } Il tlltAa51[Flial4Y CA1l 1N~'9ll.lf lCl P{N)l Airn DFCJaAiN( W+l[Wn\ rll Ili IIV-NRf fir YlU 1 1 JDI nrv ~C `wiLl wrvJ Clu Fa ' 9AUf(fx CiRC11iAY 5YA a AlICI1~.1 xU01 )UNMrq ne{natlt l7r(Uq+l(\IOAIV~- iU+h (OmuUVllvl Wt f. tUUVIO+Cl~a1 Y+Vlnl nt la`(i~ANI+ 9 IARGf Ut~Aif N1}S N111\+aVA CO(09 LL utH)OOwOl +g90¢IVIq BAgBICU[r¢LLly 1 P<H( VAI~bI'~nlq\ `I~Pl11n4 \i![II~\ 11 \CI+I IVI1~~p~q Ulnllal MI A5I1Nt V JI M[wNUtX Nt. COw,u~~\Ilv \•n~aW+\ I~x1i vI5I+U0u Wf IW[¢ Ia(I llr i5 Nellr[U M1NIII)~loiv[Nl Sltlq+li+vln '6 UI+mUa'1 CI n0{U Iq(LNIII r~\l7Nr\51': salt ul 111Rnr Si xl( lvl nip il.ll111 r1(~U al no n inul a tuuoal n l l m(v u¢an I wu nnl.x~l u Aa (v rnasr nu xa glwuNn ur nvn nev }f X+a9(111InXt\\I 11 ln(NClntlll\+NIIINA\r~4[(tl lA ril 11 V r+ 11 RI Vt+` ngfn 3 OI..rNnlht l.n Lt ](i PIi Nlt nX[ 1 wi I I I lFmnl V~~l! l ARJ ~ « 1 f Nr 3; ~(~XmA x051 (\V'1^N INN+. UYA ., pgi,> ,4„AA VW+Y DIVERSIFIED /ASP'?'~~~~~~ DEVELOPMENT GROUP LlC CONCEPTUAL ENLARGEMENTS SUBTi 17435 DRC2005-00071 Church and Maven City of Rancho Cucamonga FI,• .n ~a(Nn(C`L a( / S~IE ^~a ilx4 ~~ ~ ~rH ~+n ]Nri lid I~ 4 ®~ U IL IU SJ ~i~U PITASSI A~IIIEC:TSwc CHILDREN'S TOT LOT AREA POOL/SPA RECREATION AREA GAZEBO/PICNIC AREA ~r ~d V ~~ -~-.` 'Y ~' ~~a o ~ ~~ I~ -1,- i,~~ ~n ~ -~~. ~b ~~-6~rc;- ~_`,- ~ r,,, ,y, I fl II ~ ' ~ ~ I I I Y I 51pf [liVn-OVI c ~~~ -~...,~~ PERIMETER FENCIVL ALONG CHL'R<H/COMMERCIAL SITC '. 6 MILK UbUTAF SfEI EfnChO \YI IM Sf 6NP flIUCK PILnAf V CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS DIVERSIFIED SUBTT 17435 DRC2005-OD071 ,.„as~.~E <a.~,lF-ASE ~~~~ - Ch iar-ch and Haven °,__;;.,:n",n, ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga "I DEVELOPMENT GflOUP L L C ,,,, „ ., • vvnon sHaul A,noR vT Pl vu 0kum [lP \r~nv vl 19 n, ~1~~ PITASSI ARCHITECTSN( M Y'4M'oI ~ Y+Pa G~~s.~ 4 nm i~a~W.uu ~u i~~~n~~~e~nvs. • woon srl DoE ARNOU Al Pool PIJk II EVn IIUW T,111UI AR STLk! E V iR1 LAff ADD T~2 E!L6 A7 POO' r 3 Z d V • DIVERSIFIED DEVELOPM//~~O EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUBTT 17435 and DRC 2005 00071 C'h~rch and Maven City of Rancho Cucamonga BUILDING ONE EAST BUILDING TWO EAST p e :. ep PITASSI ARCHITECTSivc EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUBTT 17435 and DRC 2005 00071 DIVERSIFIED r~~~~ Church and Haven DEVELOPMENT GROUP lLC City of Rancho Cucamonga BUILDING ONE NORTH BUILDING ONE WEST BUILDING ONE SOUTH o e :. yo PITASSI A ITECTSi~c • r _z _±, V J BUILDING TWO WEST BUILDING l WO SUU iH DIVERSIFIED ~~~ . DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SUBTT 17435 and DRC 2005 00071 Church and Haven City of Rancho Cucamonga I I a e z~ eo PITASSI ARCHITECTSa~c BUILDING TWO NORTH r y G '~ (TJ 2nd floor DIVERSIFIED r~~ DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC • BUILDING • 1 ~; L__ 1st. Floor BUILDING FLOOR PLANS SUBTT 17435 and DRC 2005 00071 C'h arch and Haven City of Rancho Cucamonga -~ o is w is PITA551 ARCHITECTSwc • I 1 • i '( S. ~: Aa-•, .5t ~, i.. e: ac's s~ 7,t r I 3 ~ °, k = _ '' ~_i ~~ ~i o "~ 0 1 :~ ,~ . ~_~, ~ Z_' 6~ _ _ ~ _ •` ~ ;: ._Y (i~a o ~+ .! .A I ~ s~j . - ~- _ ...vp.= ~h . a f~ m5 ~ n 7 ~„ e §„ ~ ~ ' I. __ _ _ ___ __ _._- tt • ~ m.. i~ jai i iii I ~i'~ii v LJ °li "~ ~,, ~, ,~;,~~, ._ __ Z < ~ v ~~~~_ ___ _ `W ~l ~~ ~_ - ._ R ~~ 4~ _ r .u - l ~ f, ~ _ a ~~f ~` R - _. - _ -~_ - a -. ~ __ _~ v~ i j ~, ~_; o ~- ~o ^~^ 1' O r U o A~ m ("~ U P1 /^'~ ~ ~ U C ~ U ~+ ~ m~ U U J Q J w a O _ ~ U N Z N ~ W ~ o \ J W J O L.~M~IRV,D,? \~ ,___ _ _ ~_ ~. .. N ¢ i ~ ~ 1 _'~ i F .y a x' s I z~ ,, ,,~ ~ .. ~ o ~ ~-... ~_ ~ _ - ~, iN a: ~ __ _- - - i _ ~_ ,, , _; -, _ ~, - _ ~ _---- -- _ ~ ' ~ -- : 2 I . ~ t ~ --- , - ., ~, -- ., ~ o .~ ~ o~ m -- - ~ ~~ ~~ ~; ,. ~ _ __ ~ i ~ - i ~'~~ ~=- - _a %-- -- m -- ~1.r ~ - -- ~, .-_ , h' i. "' ;,~ ~ - _~ ga e I Y°~'~ _ _- ~ - ~1 ~`~ ~ __- ___ j ~ + •~ 1 7 o t ~~ z' f ~ ~_~_ =,'ice-'- _ .. J - _ ~ L~NI,N~I~~Q ~2~~ ~,' ~.` e r~,. • I o ~ N U hhh~~~"""I/I c • p ~ J ~ ~ U 1^ V1 ~ J ~ N U G ~ ~"'~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ 1+ U .1 Q ~ _ J J a o LL . ~ [7 _ ~ z ~ W \ o . J W J • .; ;~ N.- , ~ v~ S ,~~ . .~, ^• ~r ~l ~~ ~ .~ rte, w r. 0i _. -v6~ ?, ,~~ ~ :. i -I a~! c; c n u u C L' 4 N h L U ~~ ht,N, ~7, ~, 2\ c d. u a~ C v x; G ~~ ~~ ~p~~ _ ~o 1_ __l~ e o r ~1~, O v/ O O o r N ~ bCp ~ '~ ~ Q ~ ('~ U ^ .. C ~ U O n U ~ ~ M H ~ 0 ]~ ~ ~U U _J Q J W ~ a ~ O ~ ~ _ ~ U' (~ z W o \ J W O ~~ ~~ ~•;,~ -l• ~. r-- ~- -~-, ~~~ 7 c u 0 G O ~ I v: t N ~ b4 ~ ~~ ~ • r b ~ ~ ~ U ~ ,~ ~ m 0 U ~U H ~ ~~ o ~ ~U U Q W J J ~ a O ~ _ (n ~ ~ C7 z W o • J W D O ~,N1,N,~,P, ~2 • i• ,e ~" . .M ~, . e` ~\.Y^ ham. 9/ J ~a ~ ~ ,.-,nq~- ,. t ' -~.~ ' K21 <_ ~~ ~ = __ \' l~' ~L J e~ v, W c~ 0 LL~ G C U u, L,M, N,c7,~2- 3 J a u W u C v, r Vi '~ i~ _ Ie p 1- A~ O O O 0 ~ G~ r ~y ~ ~ v }~ '~ ~ (~ U (~ '~ U U ~ N ~ ~ 'MI' J ~U J Q J w ~ a 0 LL ~ _ . c9 (n z L.L_ ~ W O J w ~ o i _ e ~ ; ~'~ i ~ i e S r r T J Q N t n"•-'.:Yt~~~' j-)y"~`-i5y`r.7~a ~Y,~'~`~{p''~v~i ~-r3 i~{~'b,v~~~~r +~'..'*' ~' '' t. i, i~ G ___ _~ F r r~ :, r-,~c~~° i - ~ ~ t S[?an~sh - LeR Elevat~an Spam sh - 2~ght ElcvaU On DIVERSIFIED sus-r-r ~ ~4ss and DRC 2005-00071 ~~~~ Church and Haven DEVELOPMENT GROUPLLC City Of RanCt1O Cocain Origa • • ,;,. ~~ C~ L~ JI CI I I J m~ ?I • . 1~ I j x~ I WI ~I _' • ,I _~ L u, ~~ J JI ~I k [r LI ~~ ~I ~I W' J v~ ©~ ~' ~~ >, ~~ ~I r- ~I V ul %i ~I ~I I~ L\ S it ~~ ~~ II ~!~ ~ - i 'I__ a ~ i ~ i L~ i I j --~~ (LI I ~I JI i OI LL d ~ c ml I ~ ~I `~ 9 -~ 1 ~ ~ ~ G ~ a ~' i~ U. W J ~Jl Y~I ~ v PI ~I ^I ^ O N I ~ O J N ~ ~1 ~' a 7~ J r' (~ U w; ro j `' ~ lJ ~I ro a p ~ %i I ..mjj ~ / \ J f y `i lA_ V r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U ~' Q J J ~,` a ai W . o =i ~ ~ ~ ~ w W o \ J W ~ ~, O i_-yM,N,O,P.25 , , I i _a ,~ `r a~~rl ~.. t~~i .ry^--~~.~~ ~.~ -S ~~ rya y~ i:~ - .. R "i~ e. rt ~ 1 I ~ a' '4_ e ~ - s __ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ "yyyylrrJL ~ry± \ I `YILL~~ ~~ ; I~~ I ~ ) ._,f _;~ ~ \;: p )9 i ~ { ~ ~~ , ) ,, ' ,~ ~',; g ~ pi . ~~ `l ~.,~.~, ai 0 __ . _ ' ~O ' ' J ~, i t - s ~~ ~ ~n, ~ t `ji b ,i ) ~ I ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ n ; ~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~i __- ~ _ __ Yli9 ~- , ~S tadda =1' a))i 54 i v •, _ 93lY~a _ii'~~J - ~- - .x a u ._ _ &I r~~, __ ~ j ~~ , n _ , ~T -- , ., ~; 4 ,~ o i ~;- d ~~ i a-_~ _ '-'3 L C n a_ ~ ~i '~ U fj.,~ _JJ_ I i ~„ ~Nh- Nit ^v '~c:, moo.. nor - r, r, 1 J <~44 L1CL '~AI \f O V o W °o ~ N ~ ^~~D hhh}"'"''"''~lll 0 • V Q r U G c~ U r W F ~~ ~ ~U J Q J LL! a O r_/~ • U n ~ Z ~y W L1 G W o J / W • c., N~, N, ~,P, Z~ • i • i • '~I U~_~I ~ u ~i ~~~ i v 4I r, ~, ~ ~ L~ M,N,c~, t~l z7 i~ ~^ ~_ -I - ~_ o ~i ~ r,NhN rlv„ _ t„v N -a- ~ v, C nC~ ?7 n ` J Q .7f ~r.+4Q ~cCa i O r ~ (d U ~ M ~ ~ ~ U r " ~ ~ ~ ~, ~; ~ U U J Q J W a ~ O ~ ~ ~ C7 _ (~ 2 W o J W O i ,.Y f+ ~ r a~ - -, ~- ~ •y ~ ~ g g 33 e; FI ~! i ~~ ul L,hI,N, c7,~~ ; z~ .~ ~~o ~. ~ L. n Nnn NNE ~T- nab c _~ n F U z;~a az<e _cCc ~ •--' ~ ^, W I C Q N ~{J'~ `V ~ w ' ~' U q hhh~~~iii ~ ~ c • ro ro ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ U o v r ~ N ~ ~ ~ U ~~ Q W ~ ~ U J J a ~ O ~ _ N l.6 ~ ~ C7 Z ~ W o J W • J O _ o ~ • f '~ Ih/ ~ o _-l: ~___~ nnna nn^ egri ~P .~ hP ror -n n F U GO~C` a ~~ad 1~ u ~~ N~ v ~I r A~, O V! O O O U ~~ ro ~~ m ~U ~~ ~~ ~U C 0 m U 7 U 0 U x 0 u U J Q J _W a O ~ ~ _ • C7 N Z L.L ~ W o \ J , _~ i I 1 - .-- - ; ~, , h -t ~ :~. i ~., ~ `_~ f -,, 1 ~ I /~/~^~ ~ ~ t ~1~~ JJJ ~~ 1 ~ ~771 I_ '~ ~ . ~L11~i~ y r .. , ~ 'r-~~ ~ `ay ~- -! ~i~q~l~ ~ ~ ~ ~,- i ~ r fj~l I U ~i ~ '~, _1~ --- ~ ',N ry' rr~ ' i,t }- , r ~~ ~ ~~ i I , l.~M~N~ Uj~ ~ 3~ ~~, • nnn- v,r= Nor, .- NT N~:n N' V z,~LL <oQ~ JS~Q °N c o o ~ _ ct9-;i o N ti G~ ~ I~I~ «a-~` ~i !~ k `+` U~// {.. ~cr+ y • iV ;~ i ,~ ~ 0 ~ U G ll'' '~ M N ~. p ~ ~, J v. ~ J U Q J J W a LL ~ O ~ ~ ~ r z l.l.l o J W 1 • O • ~;~~` - --- - - 7 `? ~~ r 7 z _O -t7 Ftcar S~dc Legit-S,(,e R ., -- ~~_ ~j ~+ , I Aught S,dc DIVERSIFIED sus-r-r 174135 and DRC 2005-00071 ///+C~ ~ GG DEVELOPMENT GRDUPLLC Church C:~ly of Rancho PLAN 21223[2 and Haven PROIi'CT x5099932 o.~l r- 9-15-03 PA<: P_ 2 Cucamonga ~ ~~~Y~~!!! i ~ ,o v,„, f o . G aye ~ .'s, 33r c € '~~, 3 3 s CI GI F v, ~I i U €'f ~ ~~ -- - - - ~ -- C ~ I ~ r i I •7 I i \~ ~ «~, ~ ~-~ m ~r/. T I .C'V K ' ~ i I ___ _ _ _~ t ~ it ~I ~ L er r- ~-. %- ~- - ~ ~ t f 1 ~ ______ ~ i i Sri { x L • ~~: i~, '-''sky - _ /~ ~i}V: ~fxi ijJ~ i rI ~ { ;~ ~ ;' ~ /~ ~ x`~ i~ i/'___~c_ ___-- a J' w lag ~ V ~~ ,\ 2 ~~ ~ :r~ 1 ~ `-' _ ~~~~ - ,--- ' _.4j ~ __~f ~~~ , l 14~. ~• ~: nnv-; Nv NQv a_ NPr ri v, r, Z~~a j~<~ cafe r i O /}~ ~V O • ~ ~ U (~ J ~ c ~ ~ ~ ^ U U ~~ ~ ~ ' •• ~i ~ w L [~' n V L U ~~ V J Q J W a _ O c~ _ (n z ~ ~ W o J W 1 • O ~, :~ ~I YI P ~~ nn•a nhc nP; NTH roe Nn r F ZWwa <OFJ .C<< _cOc • ~~ vl ~! ~~ L,M,N, O, P 33 J~ :, J ~, 0 I U ~~ v m ~U ~~ UU 0 U J J V U r 0 U J Q J W ^` a • `\V~, ~ O ~ ~ '_^ • U' n W I..L ~ W o J / w I. '' Ix ., 1J; 'I' Aa[ IV 4CI -- - , ; .~ ',} , -- ,E-,IOX . r.. ~ ' Z O cP ~NEML -_ -_ _ -' Il "' r`~ I M , > > ~ I . ~ ; 1 - , I _T_-- I _r__ _ s• ~ I---~ .I_ r ~a ~~1 ~ ~ l y- ~ ~ I ~.a- ,. I m.Xnt m4Ar' ~. ~ ~ ~. I t.- '° A _J~.~~ -~--'.X^~~'.-y'~I~_~~.. 97f _•¢•t s~nlw ~_ s•' sr u~vaaw. - i~c+v+cx suss` _- . wus ... A ' ;il ... „_ sa ..w.s i 1, ii11C.C S[CxOH 4 ry121t fFRIxV M [4}IIX43LS[[l l`e9grE4Mi ,:~ ~` ~~ 4 - ~, r I ,~,~ .~ I ,. ',~,,, ~ _ 6. I _~ "^„~T''17"!F- ~ .„~~'S~~p'T wTrnlo. oslvew.: ~. SIC',ON 0 SFCi o' C SECTOX A nrlo~. c ucno. s ~ DIVE/~~ D DEVELOPMEM GROUP LLC • CONCEPTUAL GRADING MAP SUBi7 17435 and DRC2005-00071 C'1iua~cla and Maven City of Rancho Cucamonga • -- o.~A ,,,.. ;a;u°r,~'u,A'., p4~ [wC_x.ll. ,[Lx~ }'w~~'1 9 ~,~ Imr~o n ss,r r ;` ,.,~. ~. , ~.V v~~v .,, '`I ~i~ yl ~ E ;*`F II,r .31~n ~{~~ ' 2 y u ` s ; ~ '; jh;~ rd FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES :t,~, y.i., ,A.c Ja ; `, ` TENTATIVE TRACT NO 17435 , t,~,~ V~,;,;,, ~ IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, VICINITY MAP COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CAUFORNIb -~i~- - GOATION Oi LOT < TPACT M W NO ZI01 MB 3a(6] 0.EC00.050i 5xN 0E0.N40.01NO COONTY 1JLY 192005 1Axp4Ar 1f00 IA )l4EA[S LAOf310xJ40fAE0t0T 1LE'iFRF]tPS IA 2s4cus NEr Nlr s 2005 AB0.1L 26 2005 NNU40.Y 15 2005 (N 256 1911 M1LIDOLF L ASSOCLCIES, INC ~~~ ~ ~~=~~~ I PITASSI ARCHITECTSINc • I q[r j~ ~ f ° 'j '~ ~~ I -' ~ li~ ,F.,~114r I ,~ -.: I I ~ , 4 ~1 ~. I'! I w' i N Id, Id .'I ill ~ ~~-I qW, H ~ I' r ; W., I ` V I I ? '' >; +' I i ~ ~ }`, ~. Z LI 1~ ~~ 1, ` I s ..1-_ L V'~ I h1EML I nmm nmi wnxm. WM1S I4CnF[SS _ JacxlrHl L_ 1d`r~H'' . r .~__~._~.-. _.~____..._.,.-__". - i r~ --"- ^,._...v~_ ______ ~ . _..__•__ f ce.~y;-'~y ~, _; '~~., .,.,,ate, IEGENO {/~~~%~ % / - \ ,) -~~ • ~ __ • ; ..~. ~ a°. rtur uqa' T. • I w iz w , ~Z kw , Q 1= .' .~ i It -{'= - ~ I: ~II FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT NO 17435 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN RERNARDINO, $lATE OF CALIFORNI RUR+ION OR LOT . TRACT MPR NO 3301 MB 1V6) RECOAf150F SAN 8fRN4AOINO COJNTY VICINITY MAP pNVAAY IWS ~d 114[A[$GROSS IONW IfA[D IOi , EiRAED IGLS -_„~.•• FIRE ACCESS PLAN ,N~:'b,loDl H36 AG[S V[i rXyH °°'"'° nORR lE,1005 SUBTT 17435 and DRC2005-00071 imr 19 :oos 1ANUAAV Is :oos 1N 166-1911 DIVE'RS~I'FIjED C'hurrch and Haven MADOLEAASSOCIATES,IVC -~ ~ /~~~=r;~(~~i r~~ -~~..~•4 PITASSI AR~ ITECTSIti DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC City of Rancho Cucamonga 'N•••~'~~" ~""' •°°° °'•^^"•' It ' jgrA fH I ' is ~_i . ~ I ~J - - - --I :<.A[ ~~ is YY~H 4 OCK ~ I ~ ,. i/ I I '' I , I I ~ . ' ~ __ - oCx !Y ~3 ~ IL ~ ~ i,-. ~C E. i~ ( . •i I } ~~11 - rJ ' I I ' w +' ' - ~'"I~' ~ mli~.,,, ,~ Iw ~ ' z •w, U II 3 (j', ~ ~ I -- ~ a , I I, ~~ ~ ;I II1 I lel { ~ f i ~ , D I ` I _ , j~ I f I I~~ II s. I ~_I.~. CHEMLOCK ~ I J W i~ G I u' __ _ .. J=a~ru '~ _ _ _ 0nno•a ovL n~wna emu no.u.e DIVERSIFIED r~~ DEVELOPMENT GROUP J I ~~ A ~ f~ Xl l --~ w .~.......-___ ~hE ~..-__-_r,. ~_ LECENo ... ,~,. Fro ~ ...~...,. ~ i '~ ~2 ~ ~ _ ~A ~ _ ~ I M1I~.: Dr, IY f~~tl i ~tifl'!~ CA'lHa, ~ '-- PHASING PLAN SUBTT 17435, SUBTPM 17460 and DRC2005-00071 C'liurc~i acid Haven City of Rancho Cucamonga I ~~ I. (~ Iyy' i I~1 e e SUL(~'~(F4 eexcx..~. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TENTATIVE TRACT N0, 17435 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 17460 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA COUNTV OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA V04ilON OF LOi• LNKT MAV NO 2}D} MB 1b61 AEC00.090f SAN AERNA0.01Y0 CO~niV pxWA~}WS iL }; KAB 4A01110 xLNA[1E0 LOi }IEIiFAfOlOR N }644[f xfi JANUAAV ~0 2006 JN }fifi 1921 NADOI F b ASSOCIATES, INC l rrr ,.Vn.~. PITAS51 A~ ITECTSInc _ VICINITY MAP Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Design Review DRC2004-00071, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES • Attendance at the Neighborhood meeting was good with 21 adults and 8 children in attendance The following topics were raised at the Neighborhood Meeting on October 18, 2005 relative to the development applications for the Church and Haven Project 1 Traffic Signal needed at Center and Church intersection The resident at the intersection indicated they did not want a traffic signal flashing m then window 2 Wdl the unimproved lots on Church be improved with street widening on the north side of Church at and west of Centers Staff will check on the availability of right of way to accomplish the physical improvements 3 The Marine and Church intersection has many traffic collisions will the improvements solve this problem? ' 4. Consider using Haven only access during construction 5. Consider as alternative land use all Single Family detached to lower traffic impacts associated with the proposed Mixed Use Land Use and limd access to Center Avenue only. 6. Off site perimeter improvements and grading will be accomplished during the first phase. 7 Too much density and condominiums m the area already 8. When is the signal scheduled for Hermosa and Church? 9. Will the power Imes on the north side of Church be put under ground with this Project? 10 Will parkway landscaping be installed on the north side of Church across from this Protect? 11 Will parkway landscaping be installed on the south side of Church west from this Project to Hermosa? • r1 L J EXHIBIT E L~M~,~IP,~-~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Plamm~g Division . City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7653 Caztilla Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 March 20, 2006 rlaR 21 zoos RECEIVED -PLANNING To whom it may concern r~ U • Because I am unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting on March 22, 2006, I waste in reference to Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, the proposed development of condominiums, houses, and office space on the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street m Rancho Cucamonga. Having reviewed the paperwork on file at the City Plannutg Division, I must express concern over two apparent oversights in the proposal--the unproper defimtion of "peak hours" m this location and the inadequate modifications to Church Street to mitigate traffic. The traffic study Summary and Conclusions state that, "With the addition of traffic generated by the protect to opening day conditions, the study intersections are protected to operate at satisfactory levels m both peak hours" (22). However, the study seems not to have accounted for the fact that the mtersectron of Church Street and Camilla Avenue is busiest dunng the hours when students from the Dona Merced School are coming and going. At these tunes, the pedestnan and veluculaz traffic already make it quite difficult to exit Caztilla Avenue onto Church Street. I do not see how it is possible that traffic will remain "satrsfactory" with the extension of Caztilla Avenue into the proposed development. This is especially true if the City follows the suggestron that the Church Street crosswalk should be moved from Center Avenue to Cartrlla Avenue (22, Conclusion 7). I am also concerned about safety at the mtersectron of Camilla and Church: It seems unplausible that the existrng through-traffic on Church Street, a crosswalk, and veludes tunung left and nght onto Church northbound and southbound from Camilla will not create hazardous conditions for pedestnans and dnvers alike. It also seems likely that traffic on Church Street will backup given that Church Street will not be widened at Center Street: Four lanes of traffic along Church between Haven and Cornell will squeeze into lust two lanes at Center Street. An obvious solution to these traffic concerns is to close the entrance to Dona Merced School on Cartrlla Avenue. Tlus would ehmmate both vehiculaz and pedestnan traffic from the school and thus mitigate both traffic and safety hazards. Ph.D. ~,NI, N, ~, P' , 3 ~ MEMORANDUM • ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: Apnl 3, 2006 C,UCAMONGA To: Dan James, Senior Ciwl Engineer From: Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer Subject: DRC 2005-00001, Southwest corner of Haven and Church On March 21, 2006, a letter was received from Mr Jonathan Ausubel regarding the subject development Mr Ausubel had several comments on traffic issues Mr Ausubel's concerns and staffs responses are as follows Concern The study did not account for the fact that the intersection of Church and Cartilla is busiest when students from the Dona Merced Elementary School are coming and going Response The Dona Merced Elementary School starts at 8 50 AM and lets out grades 1-3 at 2 45 PM and grades 4-6 at 3 05 PM The traffic study collected traffic counts from 7-9 AM and from 4-6 PM Therefore, the 7-9 AM traffic counts include traffic from Dona Merced Elementary School The City's 24 hour traffic count record dated April 9, 2001, indicates that the heaviest traffic volume on Church Street occurs between the hours of 4 and 6 PM The total traffic volume on Church Street • between 2-3 PM and 3-4 PM was 472 and 485 vehicles respectively The traffic volume on Church Street between 4-5 and 5-6 PM was 650 and 698 respectively. The traffic volume on Church Street from 2-3 PM is only 67% of the traffic volume from 5-6 PM Therefore, the traffic volume on Church Street is not heaviest when the students are leawng Dona Merced Elementary School Concern The traffic on Church Street will back up at Center Avenue if Church Street is not widened from 2 to 4 lanes Response Then traffic study indicates that the intersection of Church and Center wtll operate at an acceptable level of service (Level of Service C), even without installing a traffic signal or widening Church Street However, if the proposed protect is approved, the project will be conditioned to install a new traffic signal at the intersection of Church and Center, and to widen the north side of Church Street from Center Avenue westerly to the Park The developer will be reimbursed for constructing these improvements from the City's Transportation Fee program, less the Transportation Fees owed by this protect The City's Transportation Fee charges $3,658 per single family dwelling unit, $2,195 per multi-family dwelling unit, and $4,390 per 1000 sf for office space This development will owe approximately $500,000 in Transportation Development fees for the mitigation of new traffic generated by this protect Concern The traffic study suggested moving the schoof crossing from the intersection of Church and Center to the intersection of Church and Camilla Response City staff is recommending that the intersection of Church and Center be improved to its ultimate width and that a traffic signal be installed Students liwng on the south side of Church Street will be directed to cross Church Street at the signal at Center Avenue • ~./NI,N,p,P, 3~1 DRC 2005-00001, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AND CHURCH n ,..... z enni PAGE2 Concern If the entrance to the Dona Merced Elementary School on Cartdla Avenue could be closed, it would eliminate vehicular and pedestrian traffic on Cartilla Avenue going to and from the school Response The entry gate to the Dona Merced Elementary School is controlled by the School Distract. City staff does not see a safety problem wdh the school entry from Cartdla Avenue If the residents on Cartdla Avenue desire to have this school entry closed, they need to address their request to the Central School Distract. If you have any questions, please call me at extension 4051 C Joe O'Ned, City Engineer u • Z~r~iNi ~~ P, L{l7 ~~~ . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS Lar Henderson November 1, 2005 7.30 p m. ry ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 -PITASSI ARCHITECT, INC. - A proposed 10-lot subdivision map for Condominium purpose on a total net site area of 10 95 acres with a 3.36 acres remainder, located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN: 1077-401-35 and 36. Related files: Development Review DRC2004-00071, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001. , ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00071 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC. -The proposed development of two office buildings totaling 44,762 square feet, 126 residential Condominium units, and nine single-family detached units on a total net site area of 14.31 acres, located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN: 1077-401-35 and 36. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001. Desion Parameters: The project site is a surplus retention basin that the San Bernardino County Flood Control District has sold for development The approximately 14-acre site is within an • established neighborhood that is bordered by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Maintenance Yard on the south and single-family single story residences to the west and north. The Pesitlential uselthat sffcompatibletwfth neighboring ndustrial and reshdentaal usess to create a new A neighborhood meeting was held on October 16, 2005, at Central Park Community Center. The peoposed and the inadequacy of traff c-related mprovementsnsA copy'of the mee rig notes s attached for reference. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The current design for the single-family homes creates arear-on orientation to Center Street, which is contrary to the existing front-on single-family residences across Center Street. The homes on the west side of Center Street have a front yard setback of approximately 37 feet to the curb face while the current new development design proposes a 17-foot parkway side walk and landscape area to the rear tract wall. A redesign of the single-family homes to front onto Center Avenue (rather than turn then backs onto the existing neighborhood as shown) maybe a consideration. The single-family homes could be designed with rear-loaded garages that access from the interior of the protect site similar to the John Laing Homes project that has single-family homes fronting on San Bernardino Road. • 2. The residential portion of the protect has a density of 12.4 dwelling units per acre. Although Streelt,~he Committeeashould di cuss whether simgar tranlsit ontshou dhoccusalong Church ~,Nj,N, ~, P , y\ ., DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC. November 1, 2005 Page 2 Street. The existing single-family neighborhood to the north, across Church Street, is 70 percent comer side-on and 30 percent rear-on. The proposed condominiums are approximately 140 feet from the nearest house to the north. The basin will be filled to develop the site and pad grades are proposed at 2 to 4 feet below Church Street and 4 to 6 feet below the houses to the north. 3. The entire protect utilizes two architectural styles: Spanish Colonial and Craftsman. The Office development is Spanish Colonial, with the condominiums and single-familydetached a mixture of both styles. In keeping with the Commission's review of similar projects, the consideration of creating a neighborhood theme within a neighborhood may be appropriate to consider with architectural styles applied to creating a neighborhood pod within the development that would provide a greater degree of identttythan the random piacementof the two styles. 4. Office Buildings -The applicant must submit elevations of the sides and rears of both buildings. A colored rendering of the protect as viewed from Haven Avenue should also be provided. Secondary Issues: Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: • 1. It is recommended that project entrances be designed so that they could be retrofitted in the future to meet City standards for a private gated community, particularly fuming radius (see • Engineering Department handout). Many of the City's apartment and mobile home protects are now retrofitting gated entries. 2. Consider providing a gated pedestrian access to the Office use area in order to create a truer mixed-use project. 3. Mailbox location(s) should be labeled on the Site Plan. 4. A mixed-use protect is usually recommended to be bwlt m one phase; however, a Phasing Plan would be considered if submitted. No Phasing Plan was submitted; hence, it must be assumed that the entire block will be developed at one time. This is not a true mixed-use protect because the residential and office portions are physically independent Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the project be modified to address those issues the Committee determines warrant further study. Attachment Desion Review Committee Action: Members Present: Stewart, Coleman (McPhail abstained) Staff Planner. Larry Henderson The Committee recommended that the applicant revise the project to mcludesingle-family homes as • a density transition along Church Street. The Committee recommended that the applicant review the latest architectural plans for Lewis' °Amador' protect. The Committee noted that the City is taking a more cautious approach to m-fill protects to ensure design sensitivity. L~ M , N' ~, P,~- Z f DRC ACTION AGENDA J SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC. November 1, 2005 • Page 3 The Committee noted that the applicant is requesting a "Mixed-Use' land use and zoning designation; however, indicated that there is nothing mixed about the Site Plan concept. The residential and office portions have been designed as totally separate. The Committee expressed concern that the residential Site Plan is too rigid. The Committee indicated that they would support use ofthree-story buildings on the southerly portion of the prolect'rf single-family homes were provided along Church Street. The Committee stated that the office portion was attractive; however, full elevations of all sides of both buildings need to be submitted for their review. The Committee recommended that the project be revised and return as a full item. • • ~,M,N', o, ('~ ti 3 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:10 p.m. Larry Henderson January 17, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 -PITASSI ARCHITECT, INC. - A request to subdivide 14.77 gross acres of land into 10 numbered lots, and two lettered lots, for the sale of 135 residential condominium units in the Flood Control Distract (Mixed Use Distract proposed), located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN: 1077-401-35 and 36. Related files: Design Review DRC2004-00071, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, and Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00071 PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC. - A request to develop a Mixed Use project comprised of two office buildings totaling 44,782 square feet, 126 residential attached condominwm units and nine single-family detached units, on a total net site area of 14.31 acres, located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN: 1077-401-35 and 36. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001. • Oral presentation will be given by Principal Planner. Plans will be available at the meeting. Attachments Desion Review Committee Action. Members Present: Stewart, McPhail, Coleman Staff Planner: Larry Henderson The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented. • L,N~,N, c~,P~ uu • ENVIRONMENTAL _ ' INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) Ctty of Rencno Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one one to the next Ime ) Planmrg Dmsron (g09) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuantto City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, tr I anon will not betdeemed complete geological reports may be required. The project app unless the identified special studies/reports ace submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. ED Please note that It Is the responslbllrty of the appl~rant to ensure that stafl will not be available to peAorm work regwred to provide missing the appllcai mformahon Appl~catlon Number for the protect to which this /orm pertains Pro~ectTitle Residential/Office Mixed Use Project Diversified Pacific Development Group, Phil Burum Name 8 Address of pro/ect owner(s) 10621 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name&Addresso/developer orpro~ectsponsor Diversified Pacific Development Group. Phil Burum, 10621 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamon a CA 91730 Clef Fns ;,' ~_1 ,1; ,,~iliii 1._,M~ N,O,P~I mrnr ~~ '~ -~ ~~,N411AIf; Contact Person & Address Peter J. Pitassi, AIA, Pitassi Architects, Inc. 8439 White Oak Avenue, Suite 105 • Rancho•Cucamonga, CA 91730 NameBAddressofpersonprepanngth~s/orm(ddr(ferentfromabove) Peter J. Pitassi AIA Pitass¢iArchiteets, Ihc:r_8439 White Oak Ave., Suite 105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Information indicated by an asterisk (7 is not required o/non-construchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by slat/. '1) Provide a full scale (8-12 z 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the prgect sde, and lnd~gte the site boundaries 2) Provde a set of color photographs that show representahve views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representahve mews of signrrcant features from the site lnGude a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/ectLocation(descnbe) 14.77 acres in two parcels at the southwest corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet d necessary) 1077-401-35 & 36 '5) Gross Site Area (adsq h) 1 4.77 acres '8) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications) 14.31 acres • 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet d necessary) The parcels are currently designated "Flood Control - Utility Corridor". We are proposing to amend the general plan to designate these parcels as "Mixed Use". • Telephone Number (909) 980-1361 8J Include a description o1 all pes which wtll be necessary from the City of Ranc• ucamonga and othergovemmental agenaes in order to fully implement the protect • G.P.A., Development District Amendment, Design Review Approval, Parcel Maps, Condominium Tract Map, Grading Permit, Building Permits. A Section 404 Permit from the Army Corp. of Engineers, and a 1602 Permit from the CDFG. We will also require a WDR from the RWQCB. 9) Describe the physcal setting of the ste as rt exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stabdrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any ewshng structures on sde (mcludmg age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of sgnrra3nt features described In addition, ate all sources o/mformahon (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeolog~a31 surveys, traf(c studies) The site is vacant and was formerly used as a detention basin by the County Flood Control District. As a result of recent flood control improvements in the vicinity, the County deemed the property "surplus" and sold the parcels to Diversified Pacific Development Group through a public auction. The property is bermed on 4 sides and includes several storm drain outlets along the northern edge including control structures at the southeast corner. There are no buildin s on the site. Attached is a detailed Biological Study prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates and a Focused Survey prepared by LSA These studies describe the physical=setting and address biological issues in rester detail. 10J Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o/the site Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral h~storyJ No known historical or cultural significance is associated with this site. u ~,MfNJ~fP~ ~~~ 11) Describe any noise sources and them levels that now afect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Haven Avenue is a Mayor Divided Highway and generates traffic • noise. The CVWD facility to the south could generate noise from maneuvering vehicles 12) Describe the proposed protect in detail This should provide an adequate descnphon of the site rn terms of ult~male use that will result from the proposed project Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the eMent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach add~tronal sheet(s) rf necessary See attached sheet. 13) Describe the sunoundmg properties, rnGudmg information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/ development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) To the north and west of teh site, one story single family homes are present. To the south, the CVWD Administration and Maintenance Facility occupies the majority of property. Commercially zoned and developed property exists along Haven Ave. east and south of the site. 14) ~!I the proposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project No. Our proposal will provide appropriate transitions between the industrial uses to the south and the residential uses to the • north and west. L,Nt,NI~,P , ~~ 12. The proposed mixed use project includes an office use adjacent to Haven Avenue and multi-family residential use within the middle of the site. Single family detached units will be positioned along Center Avenue. The office use along Haven Avenue is consistent with other commercial development south and east of the site. The multi-family residential use provides an appropriate transition between the industrial and maintenance uses to the south and the existing single family homes north of Church Street. Our proposal includes the positioning of single family detached units along Center Avenue to provide a softer transition to the existing homes which front along this street. To accomplish the transition uses envisioned for this infill site, a General Plan designation of "MU" or "Mixed Use" is requested. • • c.-,ht,N,c~, P , y`~ 15) Indicate the type of short-teed long-term nose to be generated, including soe and amount How wdl these noise levels affect ad/scent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed ~ No noise generating uses are proposed. Onsite vehicle noise may be generated from the drives and parking areas. • '15J Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees None. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the sde drams The site will continue to drain to the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. b CommerciaUlnd (gal/day/ac) ~ Peak use (ga ~ Septic Tank ~ Sewer 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system ~s proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga Valtey Water D~stnct at 987-2591 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further danficat~on, please • contact the Cucamonga Valley Water D~stnct at 987-2591 aUda ~ Peak use (gaUDay) x 2 7 7. 2 0 2 a Res~denbal (g yJ 3 8 6 01 ( ) 1 5 568 Umn/ac) (x2) 31 , 1 36 (assume 16 tenants ) 26 370 a Resdenttal (gal/dayJ ~- 6,384 b CommerciaUlndustnal (gaUday/acJ RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units 1 3 5 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Nine (9) lots averaging 5 000 s ft Attached (mdtcate whether units are rental or for sale units) 126 for sale condominium units. • LfhI,N1(~) ~, 50 21) Antiapated range of sale paces and/or rents • SalePnce(s) $200,000.00 to $ 400,000.00 Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number ofbedrooms by unit type Single family will be 3 and 4 bedrooms. Multifamily will be equally divided between 2 and 3 bedroom units. 23) Indicateant~apatedhouseholds¢ebyuniltype All units can anticipate occupancies of singles to households of up to 5 people. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the pro/ect Contact the appropriate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment 8 . a Elementary Central School District K-8 = .48/unit 135 x .48 = 65 b Jumw High c Semw High 1 3 5 x. 2 7 = 3 6 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 26) Describe type of use(s) and maw function(s) of commeraal, industrial w mshtuhonal uses Professional and medical office. 26) Total floor area o/commeraal, mdustnal, or institutional uses by type Approximate 20,000 sq. ft. of medical office use. Approximate 20,000 sq. ft. of professional office use. 27) Indicate hours of operation Normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p. m. • 28) Numberofemp/oyees Total Unknown at this time Mawmum Shitt Time of Maximum Shift ~,r~,N, ~, P , 5 ~ 29) Provide breakdown o/anticipated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate of hire (or each classdication (attach add~t~onal sheet ~f necessary) Unknown at this time. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that cunently reside in the City Unknown '31) For commeraal and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount o/air pollution em~ssons (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Duality Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) N/A r1 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fie, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been crontacted to detemune their abdrfy to provide adequate service to the proposed profecty If so, please indicate their response • CVWD can provide water and sewer service to the site from existing infrastructure. Flood control capacity exists in the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. See the attached Hydrology Report and correspondence from the Army Corp. 33) In the known history of this property, has theca been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/ortox~c matenals Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not l~mrted to PCB's, rad~oact~ve substances, peshc~des and herbrades,fuels,ods,solvents, andotherflammableligwdsandgases Also note undergroundstorageofanyoftheabove Please list the matenals and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known None to our knowledge. • ~,n-(,N, o,~, 52 34) Will the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, ordischarge ofhazardous and/ortoxic materials, • including but not l~mrted to those examples listed above I/yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans No. l hereby certify that the statements furnished above and m the a adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best o/myabdity, that the tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that a adequate evaluation can be made by the Qty of Rancho Cucamo~ Date November 15, 2004 Trtle- Archi • u present the data and information required for ormahon presented are true and correct ho ay required to be submitted before an 1-.iM,N, (7~ P ~5 3 ~ ~ i HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT • I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962 5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (OPR) I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of executing this Statement, OPR has not yet compiled and distrubted a list of hazardous waste sites as required by said Section 65962 5 I am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a hazardous waste site. I declare under penalty of penury of the laws of the State of California that the . foregoing is true and correct Dated: lU~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ Applicant L,M,tU~pi(~,5`~ ATTACHMENT "A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multi-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Insttutional/Govemment Industnal Park Large General Industnal Heavy Industnal (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/umt (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/urnt (tenant) Sewer Flows • Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Govemment Industnal Park Large General Industnal Heavy Industnal (distribution) 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/daylacre 1863 gal/day/acre Source Cucamonga Valley Water D~stnct Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • ~ PLANNING\FINAL~FORMS\COUNTER11niUal SNdy Part1 docPa~~~of 1a 0 t P ~ ~ ~ Rev 3/17/04 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Lme Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • • L~I~(~NfO) ~ ,S14~ Rev 3/17/04 ~ \PLANNING\FwAL\FORMS\COUNTERUnihal SNdy Part1 docPage 10 of 10 ~ i~ rr^ n~ L, /~1,N, D~ {~ , S -1 ~~ 1~~i t~ n ~~' ~~l~ r} i `r ~'~` ^ C A_` ^l W Y eo y~any~ 30 ~~anos - •an~/ iaaua7 ~o apis 3saNi ' l l _ ~4.~ ,:y .5,.=:Y'i±`': a~' s•~. Wit' e),, i ' - ~ 1 , ~ ~ .~ 5 ~ qe iiYr i • f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 i ~ , t ~ + ~ :- ~ ". .. - ' ~ ~~4:~ ea a ~ ~kf~ ~ . 1 fi `~ - _,,..... +rr•v.<~b;+# mitt 1~'~wi,`'m uxi ti Y~i ^' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~P' N 4~y'y+'S~". ~~ ~~ «il .d~ r. } -_ ~ , , .~~ ~ ~ ~,~ i ~• '' .' .i~ y__ •i.; ri.;~7 .5Y t .L ~ . `~%; E ~3s.. .. .~ ~ ~~i t° rt•^k r . 41 . ti ~.'a fi' Y.. r vi>~~Sv _~ ~~. ~~ .. ~~r~ ~~ ~. .y. q,, h', ~^ r _.}( . ^:} 'fir ~ K~~~. ` " •1 i ~`.~~ ~, - i _ Asa .~'~ <' '~~~~~ ~~ ~'S .. t ~.. .~ ~_.~,' - ~~- ;off-~" rist• _ '~, e r . FS ~~ _ r :. w~ t} ' ~, ~ L' ;~' L V 7 s V w 0 t 0 /~ V aH Q .y H V l~ ~y ,r i' X ,,: .Frt~ A.~! ~:~• - :s[i .~ )~ _ 2 =^~~' ;e;t'~t~x %-sy ~r YM >~C.~ . ~ =R:S ~ +. + ~~~ 1 „; ~?~' .. ~, ^ {~ v ~. "~i J '~-`yC ~.~ ~ ~4Fiv (h '_ 5z_ ~ y5 ~l,ax>`~ '. n ~~ _~ :,ii # ~i: ~°> 5~: =1:~ c ' ..4 ~` 1'~ a 4 3 ~titi 1 a-~~ ~i YY~t^+S~~Xy~\WAi ^ 4ht,~ir,P,~~~ Ykee' ~L ~ ` a-' r : r~. ~~'`ir:~- '~ _ .i~'~T l~:SE„ -mow. ~ ?n ''~ h'a j io ~l :1z`: P' '.f ~.:~~t 4~i 1 .iY _ _ °~ ,~~ ~r, - . ~. ~ _ ..~.~$ ~• ~S ~-trw max- _+ 3^~ £" _ _ t +.' T: it ^J X ~ u~~h ~"~ T~iu:,~ l.i + ~ ~- ,_ ~1:~.~~J i`.:Y.y°Cwi-:'WYE °µ~^I ~i..y. Rx=a f ov.Y l._ -f~x)pti u~i ~}s 1~aT~Y tom;"iA -: sue. ' ~ ..$ .r v <<' ~ '~+i+~+E4»s"' ' ~4~\*TY try, 5'~~`'ry)~ . ir:' ~ J~ yh~ ~. ~~ -]+'_ _ e s ` ~ `~~ H • .~ ~ , 3~ , ; , ; j i . r~, s c: L U w 0 r v~~. ti ~. c Ci ~- O .y «.r N rr.-y,~.„ ~-r MrN~ l~, ~ ~ \ t - `'(`,N"-'^~tf:~"~• `sir: • W bt~} d ~ ..- ~a ~ ~ ,.'~'" y x z - 1~ ~~ n~ -yM11~/n~`• t ~w t s ~_ ...y, 5.. y~°tnu~t.~: M,~ . _~ 44,. ~ _~ "'.„~.M~,;. ~.'..J`x.. ma'r'..',`°•.r:. u'.,. , 7n ` h ~7 `^ _ hex n 4%."(~s~p'Niu S . ,s `~.5~'~.~,7~e~t :ts~~4 w3y,'~'t'Y_4^ ' ~'. f :-::.Le --.'DTI. Si~~{s~~i' ~Y .~ ..'~r'9'~l t~~ i~`-s1 ~- G .~5 ~Y N~ _ 1 _ ~"~~ ~J~ .l-~S ~~~.. ~, t t ~~ _ i t -,r-. `- wig i.v. ~'n --'~'} .c 'm . ~~ ny. x _ ;±~ [~4~ "~ a•(~I ` rs. ~~r 1 ,,. .; '~ '~ - ~~ ` r x.Y-'ti~j~`-_s 'i tin ,° . " ~ vii' •:: s~TY'°Jl `~IT~`~ ~; ~.~7 ~. Sira~i• .. 5.;. y;~_ ry ti ~ n_, d~ ~S~ f~~~~ ". . Gam' s.r'.• ~ ~~-, r •'Jy ~YI~ a•tJ-.~l~~y.,t K~>~Y^•~ry V•i '-r.'- ._ ~ ~-^..i_Lf- i -~ .or-.__ e~° .. _ ,_ _ -~is.c~i .r. ~. e1~ ~ ~~ ~ _ +~• ~a Y•. • /~ V C ~J C 67 L L V O T~ V N ~~ ."~.r • =~~~P~~'T+a¢`~ ~A~ ~i"~ ~2Ybh ~~+.j.Mi' It t Y, a ` 1 ~ ~ ~,~ m.~'.p:`ti~~C» ~+Wh~`'4,,~~uu~~Yx.fin~ r.J; -~Sa :, T .. .. - '?fi°: LS.~ `.,j Cx~ ., E ~ - t~' .' ~ -~.~J ~e 'e a ~~{.. - > ., '(.'~'^'" .ca ^,~ ^Xr t'a~x cif^;•~``?~''„ .co-. '~l~' ..»"~~-~"~i w~,r: '~s~h~~,._~~~1.~~r 'ok~m' f "` L -' ~ 1 , i Y~ "]F 3~Ft rhl - V } 1 S .hx -z'S~ ..e .=r Ayi3A.i~~ ~ „. .".•S . -' " . r~ ~,.Tl " / ~.,+_'~-~~~ 25.E 4 ~x -3i~~~y ~-~ Aacy. - .Y°'3 Ems,` ~. '-' TAP 4 3ir'T ~~ ~-"ri, ,-~ az s-:'r~F .r n-•I', -'~,'-, xa.. '~C1~}~.g ,~.; c.r ~~~•',fs }J~~ 'y,~~~fr w-ia'C ~.~=3~~~=n~ ;-". ,`,,rF:,~. ..T;i ilt,~~':.:.''`ii y„; y~i..<f~x ~`t~~? 't~3.',Sv,F'>"~K~~}r~, ,~;7~,~'~ v,i.~b~ `~~:;.'i:,irw r~,~.; •-,~~{c"~_'". ~~'~r'?,~ j:s}1:~y -~1t;7~?: K="~-~` ze',?Xr.as~.`a~kE^,'~e.`i~ ... . , k, ::n,,:i"`,.kF±,tl'~trt .-:~3.~w~~,'ss.'-:-~~~:.,~ s~fy.,``f s*v~ `ca#-~?_~.h~y,i '~f`'ty~,. • ,~. ~ . ~~~a: 3! ~. i~.iJ R Y. ~,~'Yd ~! f~ fiJ.:, - $.aic',.. .,~~'Xi~ri _'~`.tv ttH.. lyjj.~~+M i~,F"~'n°~'-`i ~!• ,~r ', r,c~rz,~;+; kic~yt''n€.'2~^~"{^Me,`h R'tT~>4^'~f. Y~tl~ a ,>,.';.;"~,tr,_~,',~??~r~;. ~~,:, ~,uy`ra,Cai~%~7 V . -d a = =r: ~,i '.,'.}t„`~y i4. .~w ~f i~- ~i~t Ea'r`n., N ~'v>~S~t L @@~, s'~tXF`~q :'t ~, .y , .4._ f `ice' :'v.~~ "`"~,,? 5:. k~ sF Y{vu' ~}llY , ~y.~ i,- M1`~t v[1-s f ~~ )~~tr ,I:~Q. 1 ~ t'k ~a&5;~+ o-t ,y~~ ~k~ .~. "-g;'^- %y t~jry .3.~-,-+'i;z^ ' 2`'. .", T# :wit ~' t'n,..~ ~ i - 'tr ~,~-' LPrrv -,l~l~, ,yy~T `i+ {w<<^.3.j':7`t T=xw~';S ~;, _ .. .. _'`'',Y'ti.; __ i,'ra i." yy { ~~~ 1 lQ .. ~' .i: S : }` _ ~ _ ` ~i _ ~ ~ .. C~ l1 /~ J s U L L U w O t ..+ .. v H GJ Y ~} 4 L" • lr ~. ~ ~ ~ G:.. i t >,i.' ~5 +~3 +~~ r ..F, t . ~- _ , . . ~~` -, F. , i ~~ i%~~dyy~j yt~ 4ti (.,, r~-nui q~~Y) 1 ~~ ~y ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~_~~ ,, ^~s ~~{.:' M.-p ~v~ y~l •~Liy T A, G:'h.. E C^ ~' 1 ~G LI .F~- ~' .l :a 1p .. ~ _ 1 ~ i 1 ' 1C. 3 ~ ~+-, . . • ' Ff Y. n1 y _ , .~~,- . ~~ e SSA i `~ - 1~ F:o l ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ u ~ !t , _ . F` C cc f va .~ St `~. b ~ ~~ _ " ~.~z,~ t V L V w O L_ 7 O i V ~~ ^~ W ^Q` TW V H r • 1/ 11 u s v L s U w 0 s 0 ~: L r_ U w r ~J J r. ~d atr_.' .7. ACS ~.n ~. ~'_.`. `~~i.__. _ 2.=~..=:_~... x..~ -.~` __•_ ...,3 =..r..~a-,.X.:'d 7.":.ar~ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Protect File: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - To Amend The General Plan Land Use Map From Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor to Mixed Use with a Master Plan designation, amending The Parks And Recreation chapter, and The Flood Hazards chapter, for the development of 9single-family detached Residences, 126 multi-family residential units (14 77 Acres), and 2 office buldings (3 66 Acres) of one and two story design totaling 44,782 square feet on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 and Design Review DRC2005-00071 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC ,-A request to change the Development District Map from Flood Control to Mixed Use on property on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue- APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Design Review DRC2004- 00071 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to subdivide 14 77 gross acres of land into 10 numbered lots, and two lettered lots, for the sale of 135 residential condommwm units m the Flood Control District (Mixed Use District proposed) located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 8 36 Related Fdes General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001 and Design Review DRC2004-00071 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00071 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to develop a Mixed Use protect comprised of 2 office buildings totaling 44,782 square feet for 126 residential attached Condominium Units and 9single-family detached units, on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT-17435, Tentatwe Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 2. Related Files. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17460 -PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC - A request to subdivide 3 36 net acres of land into 3 numbered lots for the sale of 2 office condominium units in the Flood Control District (Mixed Use District proposed) located at the southwest corner of Church Street between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue -APN 1077-401-35 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, and Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001 and Design Review DRC2004-00071 3 Description of Protect: The proposed protect envisions the development of office and residential uses on a 14 77 acre site located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Figure 1) Currently, the protect site is undeveloped The protect • proposes to develop up to 45,000 square feet of office/medical uses m two structures on the eastern portion of the site along Haven Avenue One of these structures will be two stories in height, while the other will consist of a single floor The office portion of the site will include 185 parking spaces Access to these uses will be from bath Haven Avenue and Church Street ~, r-t, +U,(~,P, ~o~ Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga nRC9004-01197. DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 2 On the central portion of the site, the protect proposes the development of up to 126 multi-family residences (condominiums) and nine single-family residences on minimum 5,000 square foot lots The condominium units will be clustered in twenty-one multi-story bwldings The residential area of the proposed protect will include 2- and 3-bedroom units Recreational amenities within this area of the protect site include a pool and spa faality, tot lot, barbeque area, open lawn area, and an exercise trailgogging path The multi-family portion of the site will include 362 parking spaces Access to the multi-family area will be from two entries along Church Street Taken together, bwlding coverage and vehicular parking areas cover approximately sixty percent of the protect site Landscaping covers the remaining forty percent of the site To faalitate the development of the proposed protect, it is anticipated the following actions will be regwred A General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment amending the General Plan from Flood Control/Utility Corridor to Mixed-Use and amending the Development District from Flood Control to Mixed-Use Design Review Approval for development of up to 45,000 square feet of office use with associated parking, 9 single-family residential dwelling units and 126 multi-family condominwm dwelling units Condominium Tract Map for residential purposes Parcel Map for Office Condominwms 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Phil Burum Diversified Pacific Development Group 10621 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Existing Open Space Flood Control/Utility Corndor, Proposed Mixed-Use 6. Zoning: Existing Flood Control, Proposed Mixed-Use 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The proposed pro/ect is located within the mid-central portion of the City Developed single-family residential neighborhoods consisting primarily of one story dwelling units are located on the north and west boundaries of the protect site Haven Avenue, a mator divided arterial street, is located to the east, further east is vacant land Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) administrative offices and maintenance yard facilities are located south of the protect site Surrounding land use designations include Low Density Residential to the north and west, Office Professional to the east, and Industrial Park to the south 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is regwred): U S Army Corps of Engineers (404 Permit) California Department of Fish and Game (1602 Permit) Rev 11 9 05 nal Water Quality Control Bo~ rd 0411 ~rmi~ PI r ~ I 1 ~~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga nor~nne_n~ ~ 07 nR~~nnS-00001. SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 3 . GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG - Reactive Organic Gases PM,o - Fme Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that ,s a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) giologicai Resources ()Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population 8 Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportationlfraffic ()Utilities 8 Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is regwred () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or • NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is requred ~,N~ ,N, o,P ~q Rev 11/9!05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197 5-0 01, SU 17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 4 Date ~ G • Prepared By Date 2// 5~~0( Reviewed By • • L,M,N,O,P,~~ Rev 11/9/05 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 5 • Lass roan Sign,M1wnt Leas ' Poren~elly WN Tnen Issues and Supporting Information Sources s0nifiwn~ Mioaeovn sivnifiwnl He d I Im aC Into reteE Im ad m a EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substanhal affect a scenic wsta~ O O (~) ( ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (~) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (~) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments• a) The prolect site is located within a developed area at the southwest corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue Haven Avenue ~s designated as a wew corridor according to (General Plan Exhibit III-15) The two proposed office structures are located along Haven Avenue Community Design Policy 6 4 6 1 states that trees and structures should be • used to frame views along north-south roadways The proposed multi-family uses will provide a buffer between non-residential uses east and south of the prolect site, while the single-family uses along Center Avenue will act as a transition from similar uses to the west The design of the prolect site will incorporate applicable City design and construction requirements and will not include the construction of structures or features that would obstruct the wew corridor on Haven Avenue Impacts associated with scenic vistas are considered less than significant b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, therefore, no impact associated with this issue will occur c) The prolect area is characterized by urban development including single-family residential neighborhoods to the north and west, Haven Avenue and vacant land to the east, and the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) administration offices and maintenance yard to the south The proposed prolect will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and west and commeraal development to the east Development of the proposed site is consistent with surrounding uses and is not expected to substantially degrade the existing casual character or quality of the site and its surrounding City standards require the developer to underground new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution No impacts assocated with this issue will occur d) The site is currently vacant with no light generating use The occupation and operation of the proposed on-site use will create new sources of light and glare The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which regwre review for consistency • with City standards regwnng shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the prolect site, therefore, impacts associated with light and glare are considered less than significant I Ir,~r~/~,~ ~~ 1 Rev 11/9/05 L-• Initial Study for DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Leaa Tfien Sipnifiwnl Less Vl~Vi Tfien Mmpabon Siprvficent No AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project 2 . a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (~) Farmland of Statewide Importance (farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (~) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (~) which, due to then location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments: a) The protect site is not designated as Prime, Unique, or Statewide Importance farmland, therefore, no impact related to this issue will occur b) Because there are no agriculturally zoned land or Williamson Act land within the City, no impact associated with this issue will occur c) The protect area is characterized by urban development including single-family residential neighborhoods to the north and west, commercial development to the east, and CVWD administration offices and maintenance yard to the south The proposed protect site is not located within close proximity to any Farmland and will not cause the conversion of any farmland to non-agricultural use No impact to agricultural resources will occur AIR QUALITY. Would the project 3 . a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (~) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (~) O ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality wolaUon~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (~) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (~) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial O O O (~) n~lmber of oeoole~ • • • LtMtN,I~,P , l~ L Rev 11I9/OS Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17a35 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 7 • Less man Sipruficent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patenaally sipnifiwnt Nhih nuaeaacn Then siprvlnnl Na Im act Into ralatl I ea Im ed Comments• a) The protect is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and is within the furisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The SCAB is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east It includes all of Orange County, the non- Antelope Valley portions of Los Angeles County, and the non-desert portions of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties The current regional air quality plan is the 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District on August 1, 2003 The 2003 AQMP updates the attainment demonstration for the standards for ozone and PM,p, replaces the 1997 attainment demonstration for the Federal carbon monoxide (CO) standard, provides a basis for a maintenance plan for CO for the future, and updates the maintenance plan for the Federal nitrogen dioxide (NOS) standard that the SCAB has met since 1992 The SCAB is currently a Federal and State non-attainment area for PM,o and ozone In order to accurately assess the environmental impacts as a result of new or renovated developments, environmental pollution and population growth are protected for future scenarios Because the pollutant emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD's established • daily emissions thresholds and no CO hot spots would occur, the proposed protect is not expected to delay the protected attainment schedule included in the AQMP It is therefore considered consistent with the most recently adopted AQMP The SCAQMD has developed the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) that establishes suggested significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted According to the Handbook, any protect in the Basin with daily emissions that exceed any of the following thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively signficant air quality impact 55 Ibs per day of ROC (reactive organic compounds) (75 Ibs /day during construction) 55 Ibs per day of NOx (oxides of nitrogen) (100 Ibs /day during construction) 550 Ibs per day of CO (carbon monoxide) (550 Ibs /day during construction) 150 Ibs per day of PM,o (150 Ibs /day during construction) 150 Ibs per day of SOx (oxides of sulfur) (150 Ibs /day during construction) Air pollutant standards for CO are as follows e California State on-hour CO standard of 20 0 ppm (parts per million) e California State eight-hour CO standard of 9 0 ppm r1 L_J Rev 11/9105 L'M ~~f(~i' i~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 8 Lass man S,Bmficanl Less Polenaally WN Tl,en Issues and Supporting Information Sources S,Bmficem M,upaOOn Significant No d I Im ed Into orale0 m e Im aq b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a prolect- specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venflcation. \J 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit • construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local . ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Rev 11/9/05 L I r "i ~ I ~ f`) ~ I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 9 u Lssa Tian frpnifirenl Less Potentially Whh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sipnifiwnl Mitipehon Sipnifiwnt No Im ect Incp oralatl Im ad Im ed Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. • 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~p emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6~ of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM~p would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. • 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Rev 11/9/05 L~h1, N, D r P , ~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 10 Less Then Significant Less Pateniielly Wilh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mnipaaon Significant No Im ad Inca oralaC Im act Im ad • 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, arc conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the Cdy Council d) The proposed protect Includes a General Plan Amendment which will change the land use designation for the protect site from (Flood Control/Utility to Mixed-Use (MU) The construction and operation of the proposed protect will not generate emissions In excess of SCAQMD thresholds Additionally, the Implementation of measures required by SCAQMD Rules 402, 403, and 1113 will further reduce protect related emissions, no significant Impact related to this Issue will occur As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development within the Clty would contribute to the pollutant levels In the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was • ultimately adopted by the City Council In Ilght of this acknowledged condition, no significant impact resulting from the construction or occupation of the proposed protect will occur Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD Identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabllltation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic faculties According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts If they are located within 0 25 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants Identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The closest sensitive receptors to the protect site are residential structures located directly across Center Avenue and Church Street The proposed protect does not involve industrial process, nor does It Include any use that would generate or emit toxic substance Into the atmosphere As stated In the response to Checklist Question 3(b), the emission of pollutants during the construction and operation of the proposed on-site uses does not exceed SCAQMD thresholds The protect site Is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor Potential Impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there Is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse Impacts are anticipated Rev 11/9/05 Ll~~ INr~~Pr Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 11 U • Lass Than Sipmfiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant W0 Mmpatlon Tllan SiBnifiwnt No Im act Inca ratatl Im ad Im ed 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () (/) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on npanan habitat O (/) O ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () (/) () ( ) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation piano Comments. a) The pro/ect site is located in an urbanized area and has been previously disrupted during construction and operation of the existing detention basin Based on a letter containing the results of a Biological/Regulatory Constraints Analysis conducted for the proposed project', no special status species were observed on the project site during site reconnaissance conducted in January 2004 Due to the lack of swtable habitat, the pro/ect site is not expected to support any special status plants The site has limited potential to provide foraging habitat for several special status birds, including the California horned lark, loggerhead shrike, Cooper's hawk, and sharp-shinned hawk, however, due to the small size of the property and the low quality of available foraging habitat, impacts to foraging habitat for these species is considered less than signrficant ' Lener from Glenn Lukos Associates containing Biological/Regulatory Constraints Analysis conducted for the 14 78- acre San Bernardino County Flood Control Basin property located in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, Caldomia, Aprd 29, 2004 p Rev 11/9/05 L t ~"1 y IV _l ~(1 ~ -1 ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC20O4-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 12 Less Then Significant Leas Potanfislly WiOf Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources SiBml ant iUpaO O n M Sp nt Ne t S t ee I ~ m aa c ~ • A focused survey was conducted to document to presencelabsence of the Western burrowing owl (Athene cunrculana hypygea) Four days of focused surveys were conducted in accordance with the recommended protocol, however, no burrowing owls were detected during the focused surveys2 Because the pro/ect site is not expected to support any special status plants, the Western burrowing owl, or other special status species, impacts associated with this issue are considered less than significant A wetland delineation has been prepared for the pro/ect site3 All areas with depressions, drainage channels, or wetland vegetation were evaluated utilizing U S Army Corps of Engineer (Corps) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) criteria A total of 0 62 acre of jurisdictional waters of the U S was found to be present within the study area Of the 0 62 acre, 0 53 acre is jurisdictional wetlands and 0 09 acre is jurisdictional non- wetland waters of the U S The 0 62 acre area ~s also ripananlstreambed and is therefore subject to California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) jurisdiction Development of the proposed project will eliminate the on-site jurisdiction areas Effects to waters of the United States are regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act This permit is requred prior to the placement of fill material within any area under Corps jurisdiction Prior to issuance of a Section 404 Permit, a Section 401 water quality permit must be issued Affected CDFG jurisdictional areas are regulated by Fish and Game Code Section 1602, which regulates alterations to streambeds of lakes A Streambed Alteration Agreement is required for any protect that will divert or obstruct the • natural flow of water, change the bed, channel, or bank of a stream, or use any material from a Streambed The project site supports one speaal-status habitat Freshwater Marsh Areas of freshwater marsh occur in the low-flow areas within the basin, and are dominated by southern cattails Adherence to the mitigation identified below will reduce the significance of any impact to this speaal status habitat The project site is not located within critical habitat for any endangered or threatened species The mitigation measure below has been identified to ensure the appropriate permits are secured prior to project development Adherence to this measure and the conditions of the required permits will reduce potential impact related to this issue to a less than significant level 1) Prior to the commencement of project grading, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City that all permit requirements mandated by the U S. Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, andlor the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, have been satisfied. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are antiapated e) There are no heritage trees on the project site, therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance s Focused Survey Report for the Burrowing Owl, LSA Assoaates, August, 2004 ' Delineation of Wetlands and Junsdtchonal Waters, Church Street Basin, LSA Assoaates, November, 2004 Rev 11 /9/05 ~ f (~r N f Q)w~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 13 • L°°S TII°n Sipnifirenl L°u Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g v°'onp81y Sipmfiwnt """ MRip°ton m°" S~pnlficont N° Im ep Into oretetl Im as Im etl The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhlblt IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () (/) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () (/) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () (/) () outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site does not contain any existing structures, nor has it been identified as a • "Historic Resource" in the City No impact to historical resources will occur with implementation of the proposed protect b) The proposed protect site was formerly used as a detention basin by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) and is approximately 15 feet below surrounding grade Any archeological resources that may have existed at the proposed protect site would have been greatly modified or destroyed by the soil excavation activities associated with preparation and operation of the detention basin The possibility of unearthing archeological resources at the protect site is very low due to the disturbed nature of the site and surrounding areas, therefore, impacts associated with archeological resources are considered less than significant c) The City is located on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City or its sphere-of- influence As stated in the Draft EIR for the General Plan, areas of the City covered by older alluvium are considered to have a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources According to General Plan Exhibit V-2, the western portion of protect site is underlain by older alluvial fans deposits While a portion of the protect site is underlain by older alluvium, the past construction, operation, and maintenance of the site for flood control uses has significantly reduced the potential for any such on-site resource Had any significant paleontological resources existed on the site, they would have been discovered during past usage of the site Because of the disturbed nature of the protect site, impacts associated of paleontological resources are considered less than significant d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by soil excavation activities associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance of the detention • basin No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required far all development, Rev 11/9/05 L~l`~t~l~l~i~~'1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Leas man Sipn,ficanl Lees Polanaally WiN Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sipn^r~wm ^~i ~o?e1Btl Sipmpe ^' 1 "ey no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site Impacts associated with this issue are considered less than significant 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Paolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 11) Strong seismic ground shakings U O O (~) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (~) liquefaction () () () (/) iv) Landslides b) Result in substantial sotl erosion or the loss of topsoih O O (~) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, O O O (~) or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (~) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (~) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) (i) Fault ZonefaBased on the Gene aISP an and General PlantElR, ithe protecgt site srinot located within the City-designated Special Study Zone established for the Red Hill Fault As the site is not located within any designated fault hazard zone, no fault rupture hazards will occur (11) The Red Hill Fault is located roximat/el 3Y m les tT hese faults arehboth capable of Cucamonga Fault Zone lies app Y producing magnitude 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to magnitude 7 5 earthquakes is 13 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to magnitude 8 2 earthquakes, is 11 northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and other City standards will ensure that ground shaking hazards impacts are reduced to a less than significant level Rev 1119/05 r"'l ~~ ! N I ~ t P i CN • • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 15 Lass Than S,Bmficent Lesa PotenYeliy W0 Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sign^ficsnt MN9e0on S~gnificsnt No .., r mmmoreteC ImDecl Im Bid (iii) Only one area (at the base of Red Hill) in the City has been identified as being susceptible to liquefaction As the protect site is not located within this area, no liquefaction hazard exists on-site No impact related with this issue will occur (iv) The protect site is not located within an area identified by steep slopes Because of the location of the site, the absence of adjacent hillsides, and the present of adjacent development, no landslide impact will result from the construction or operationloccupation of the proposed on-site uses Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant b) The proposed protect will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is sub/ect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) Subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the underlying aquifer The proposed protect does not include wells or other uses that will withdraw groundwater The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic umt or soil type per the General Plan, therefore, no significant impact associated with this issue will occur No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits Soll types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sands These soils are typically excessively drained on nearly level to moderately sloping soils and are not considered to • be expansive No adverse impact is anticipated Rev 11/9/05 ~/ ~/ N/ !~~ I r~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435AND DRC2005-00071 Page 16 Leaa man Sign,ficant Less Polanhelly With Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sipn,ficant MNpe4on Sipn,ficant No I p d I ry l E Impptl Impact e) The proposed protect well connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system The proposed pro/ect does not include the installation of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal system, therefore, no impact related to this issue will occur 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the O O (~) ( ) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a signficant hazard to the public or the O O (~) ( ) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () (~) ( ) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) ee located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For apro/ect located within an airport land use plan or, O O O (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the pro/ect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For apro/ect wdhin the vicinity of a private airstrip, O U O (~) would the pro/ect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the pro/ect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an O O O (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (~) loss, in/ury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a-b) The proposed protect will result in the development of single-family residential uses The volume of household hazardous waste material (e g , cleaners, pesticides, fertilizers, paint products, and petroleum products) is anticipated to be small with exception of medical or dental materials or wastes, the pro/ect will not generally involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The transport, storage, and disposal of any such waste will conform to required local, State, or Federal requirements The City participates in a County-wide interagency coalition that is considered afull-service Hazardous Materials Division, and has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to hazardous materials emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations • • u Rev 11/9/05 Li r'~ r t~) ~l~ i S Z Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 17 Issues and Supporting Information Sources X496 n18n $IQlII~ICBlIt Le{S With Than No concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to level less than significant No adverse impacts are expected c) The Dona Merced Elementary School is located within Y. mile of the protect site As previously stated, the construction and operation/occupation of the proposed residential and office uses is not anticipated to result in a significant hazardous material impact Compliance with applicable hazardous material handling standards will ensure impacts assoaated with this issue are less than significant No impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The protect site is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path The protect site is not located within the airport land use plan established for this facility No impact assoaated with this issue is anticpated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Arport, is located approximately 5 5 miles west of the pro/ect site No impact is anhapated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes polices and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fue District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City requirement and standard, including local fve ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticpated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements~ () () (~) ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () (~) ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defect m agwfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the O O (~) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result m substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the O O (~) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site t Rev 11/9/05 ~,r~-r,w~v,~~,~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 18 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Lasa man SiBmficenl Leaa Potentially WN TNan frpnificant MNpaaon Sgnifiu No e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed O O (~) ( ) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () (~) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () (~) ( ) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () (~) ( ) that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () (~) ( ) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O (~) ( ) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction actroity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction actroities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including sde clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water • Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To comply with the NPDES, the protect's construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Rev 11/9/05 L~~I~Nf D~~,, ~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 19 Leas 7110n Siprofiwnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g raetlaally Siprofitam wrn MNpaaan may Siprofitsnl No Im eq Inm atatl Im aq I eq Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant is regwred to submit a WQMP, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surtaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be regwred to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically Identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm • drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that Identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are Initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust In order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable Rev 11/9/05 L/M(Iv l ~ 1 ~ ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 20 Loss men Sign,ficant Lau Potenpelly With Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~om ean, ~i0°~ e dnt s~emfi a , c e Im e growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater m the Cucamonga and Chino Basins This existing aquifer is estimated to be approximately 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface The protect site is not designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan The proposed protect will not intercept the groundwater table and does not include wells or other features that would result in direct drops to local groundwater levels The proposed protect wdl consume approximately 54,170 gallons of water per day (108,340 gallons on peak days) This volume of water does not represent a significant reduction in the local supply Impacts related to this issue are less than significant c) Due to the amount of new building and hardscape and the construction of a new storm drain system proposed on the site, the protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff The protect wdl not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed wa the proposed storm dram facilities to existing storm drain facilities (e g ,Day Creek channel), which have been designed to handle anticipated future flows The protect design includes landscaping of non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect wdl not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d-e) All runoff will be conveyed to the proposed storm drain facilities to existing storm drain facilities (e g ,Day Creek Channel), which have been designed to handle the flows The proposed storm drain facilities will convey approximately 369 cubic feet per second (cfs) to the Day Creek Channel which is less than the acceptable maximum discharge of 438 cfs established by the US Army Corps of Engineers A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The design and construction of on-site drainage faciities will conform to standards established by the City Adherence to all applicable drainage requirements will ensure potential impacts associated with this issue are less than significant f) Grading activities associated with the construction penod could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minim¢e water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), mcluding a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004. \J • Rev 11/9/05 ~/~~t~ 1 ~) ~ I ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 21 • Less Then Sipmfieenl Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sipn,ficant Wih M,UBeUtn Than Sipn,fiunl No Im ed Inm oreleE Im aQ Im acl 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Clty Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g-h) According to the General Plan Exhibit V-5, the protect site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area and is designated as Zone A (area with no base flood elevations determined) Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map 0607108630 F dated March 18, 1996) The new storm drain facilities proposed for the prolect will be designed to collect runoff from the 100-year storm north of Church Street and convey those flows to the existing Day Creek Channel Development within flood hazard zones are required to comply with provisions of Chapter 1912 (Floodplain Management Regulations) of the City's Municipal Code, thus no significant impacts are anticipated i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is protected from flood by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and • provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The new storm drain facilities proposed for the prolect are designed to collect runoff from the 100-year storm north of Church Street and convey them to Deer Creek Channel therefore, no adverse impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the prolect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the prolect a) Physically divide an established commundy~ O O O (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O (~) ( ) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan O (/) O 0 or natural community conservation plan • Comments: a) The site is located on the south side of Church Street between Haven Avenue and Center Street The prolect area is characterized by urban development including single-family Rev 11/9/05 L/~(/ flirt ~t ~ I ~~ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 22 LESS TnBn $IQN(IGm L065 Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotentiellY s~en,fi~.m Wtfi hLUDaocn 7Ten sipnificenl No Im aq Inm oretOE Im ed Im eci residential neighborhoods to the north and west, Haven Avenue and vacant land to the east and CVWD facilities to the south This prolect will be of similar design and size to surrounding resldentlal development to the north and west and commercial development to the east The proposed mixed-use development will provide a buffer between the CVWD facilities to the south, and the residential neighborhood to the west, because office professional uses are proposed on the east, multifamily residential uses (condominiums) are proposed in the center and single-family residential uses are proposed on the western boundary of the prolect The prolect will become a part of the larger community and will not divide an established community due to its infili nature and mixed-use concept No adverse impacts are anticipated • b) The prolect site is proposed as a future community park in the City's General Plan The SBCFCD offered the property to the Clty at the time that they determined the property to be surplus The City declined purchasing the property due to lack of available funding at that time Exhibit III-10 of the City's General Plan also designates the proposed prolect site as a Proposed Community Park This exhibit states that "Proposed park sites and Special Use Facilities are considered floating designations until the final location of the site is determined " Development of future parks under the 2020 General Plan will contribute 232 5 acres to the City's existing total parkland acreage The 232 5 acres of future parkland, when combined with the existing 549 1 acres, and the undeveloped 150 acres of parkland, will total approximately 931 6 acres, exceeding the required 782 acres by 149 6 acres Loss of the proposed prolect site, which is 14 77 acres in size, as a future • park site would reduce the total amount of parkland available at build out of the General Plan to approximately 917 acres, which is still in excess of the required 782 acres Although the prolect site is proposed as a future community park in the City's General Plan, the General Plan does state that such designation is considered "floating" until the final location of the site is determined The City has identified an additional 48 5 acres in the City as potential parkland The identified parcels and their locations are as follows Two (2) contiguous vacant parcels totaling 13 85 acres located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue One (1) vacant 1798 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue Three (3) contiguous vacant parcels totaling 16 67 acres located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard opposite Center Street and west of Haven Avenue Additionally, loss of the proposed prolect site as future parkland (14 77 acres) will not result in the City being unable to meet its parkland requirement of 5 acres per 1,000 residents Currently, the prolect site is designated Flood Control/Utility in the City's General Plan The prolect includes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of the Site to "MU" (Mixed Use) The proposed prolect fulfills policies of the General Plan, including the promotion of residential infili, the provision of a transdion between • ° City of Ranch Cucamonga 2001 General Plan, page III-141 s City of Ranch Cucamonga 2001 General Plan, page III-148 ~~ Rev 11/9/05 L / ~ti~ IN ! ~) • • • Initial Study for DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Lass may Sigm6wnt Less wnn man ...~._a ,.., s~,,,,,eum No commeraal and lower density uses, and the provision of a variety of housing opportunities The proposed pro/ect does not interfere with any policies for envvonmental protection There are additional vacant parcels of similar size in the same general area which could be obtained for future park development as noted above Although the protect site is proposed as a future community park in the City's General Plan, the City declined to purchase the property, and loss of the pro/ect area wdl not result in the City being unable to meet it parkland regwrement of 5 acres per 1,000 residents, therefore, impacts related to this issue are less than significant c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the pro/ect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the pro/ect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan However, a wetland delineation has been prepared for the protect siteb All areas with depressions, drainage channels, or wetland vegetation were evaluated utilizing U S Army Corps of Engineer (Corps) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) criteria A total of 0 62 acre of /urisdictional waters of the U S was found to be present within the study area Of the 0 62 acre, 0 53 acre is furisdictional wetlands and 0 09 acre is /urisdictional non-wetland waters of the U S The 0 62 acre area is also riparianlstreambed and is therefore subtect to California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) /urisdiction Development of the proposed protect wdl eliminate the on-site furisdiction areas Effects to waters of the United States are regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act This permit is required prior to the placement of fill material within any area under Corps turisdiction Pnor to issuance of a Section 404 Permit, a Section 401 water quality permit must be issued Affected CDFG turisdictional areas are regulated by Fish and Game Code Section 1602, which regulates alterations to streambeds of lakes A Streambed Alteration Agreement is regwred for any protect that will divert or obstruct the natural flow of water, change the bed, channel, or bank of a stream, or use any material from a streambed The protect site supports one specal-status habitat Freshwater Marsh Areas of freshwater marsh occur in the low-flow areas within the basin, and are dominated by southern cattails Adherence to the mitigation identified below will reduce the significance of any impact to this special status habitat The protect site is not located within critical habitat for any endangered or threatened speces The mitigation measure identified m 4-1 will fully mitigate this loss 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Result m the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (~) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, speafic plan or other land use plan nahneahon of Wetlands and Junsdichonal Waters, Church Street Basin, LSA Associates, November, 2004 Rev 11/9/05 ~, N~,N, o~ P, a`1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 24 Less Than SiBnifiwnt Less Polant,elly NAth Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~en~fir~m M,agaUOn s,vn,fiwnt No Im as Into orates Im ep Im ad Comments: a) The site Is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the Clty General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there Is no Impact b) The site Is not deslgnated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there Is no Impact 11. NOISE. Would the protect result In a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels In U (~) O ( ) excess of standards established In the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (~) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise O O O (~) levels In the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase en O (~) O ( ) ambient noise levels In the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (~) would the protect expose people residing or working In the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments• a, c-d) Construction Noise A Noise Impact Analyses was prepared (LSA, April 12, 2005) to determine noise Impacts and appropriate mitigation measures Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed protect may range up to 86 dBA at the closest residences adtacent to the protect site for very limited times when construction occurs near the protect's boundary Construction-related noise Impacts from the proposed protect would be potentially adverse, however, compliance with the CIty's construction hours requirement would reduce the impact to a less than significant level The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise Impacts to a less than significant level 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 8:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line Rev 1 vs/o5 L ~ h-It /~l t Ot PI q D • r1 LJ u Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 25 Leas man Sipmficem Leea Issues and Supporting Information Sources r°'BO0e0y Sipnifiram vim N4Ype0on Sipmfirent Than No Im acl Into oralea Im ad Im aC Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. • Operational Noise Protect related long-term vehicular trip increases are anticipated to be moderate However, proposed on-site residential uses would be potentially exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the exterior noise standard of 60 dBA Ldn and interior noise standard of 45 dBA Ldn Traffic noise under the opening year (2005) baseline condition in the protect vicinity ranges from low (Center Avenue, Cornell Avenue, and Cartilla Avenue, where the 60, 65, and 70 dBA CNEL contours are confined within the roadway right-of-way) to moderate (Church Street, where the 70 dBA CNEL contour is confined within but the 60 and 65 dBA CNEL extend beyond the roadway right-of-way) to high (Haven Avenue, where the 60, 65, and 70 dBA CNEL all extend beyond the roadway right-of-way) An increase of 3 dBA is perceptible by the human ear and is considered potentially significant Pro/ect-related traffic would add up to 0 4 dBA to traffic noise along roadway segments in the protect vicinity This range of noise level changes is small and not perceptible, therefore, no significant traffic noise impacts on off-site uses would occur While proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic over existing levels, according to General Plan Exhibit V-13, at build-out both Haven Avenue and Church Street create noise levels that exceed City noise standards The proposed protect will contribute to that exceedance The following measures are provided to mitigate the traffic noise impacts • 5) Minimum sound wall height required for aground-floor backyard/patio is 8 feet for the following buildings along Church Street: Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21. 6) A 5-foot sound wall is recommended for balconies associated with the following buildings along Church Street that are directly exposed to Church Street traffic: Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21. Balconies outside of 500 feet Rev 11/9!05 L,/ti1,N,~IP , q\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 26 Leaa Than $ipmfiwnl Less Polenfielly Wnfi 71tan Issues and Supportng Information Sources $iprvfifant MNpa4on $ipmfiwnt No Im ad Inm rated Im ed Im ad from the Church Street centerline or those that are blocked by the intervening structures (including those on the sides of the building facing away from Church Street) do not need balcony walls. 7) Bedrooms in Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 that are within 382 feet of the Church Street centerline and directly exposed to traffic require a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system. 8) Bedrooms in Buildings 4 through 7 that are within 792 feet of the Haven Avenue centerline and directly exposed to the traffic require a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system. e) The pro/ect site is located approximately 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario International Airport and is offset north of the Flight path The site is not located within an airport land use plan No impact associated with aircraft noise well occur f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 5 5 miles west of the protect site No noise impact associated with this airport will occur 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (~) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O O (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating O O O (~) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce significant population growth The proposed 135 residential units represent less than a 26 per cent of the total number of dwelling units envisioned in the City's General Plan Construction activities at the site will be short-term, will likely employ local workers, and will not attract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees due to the size (approximately 45,000 square feet) of office professional use The pro/ect will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impact assoaated wilh this issue wtll occur b) The project site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • • • LrMrNr(~1P `1Z Rev 11/9/05 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 27 • Lass Tien Sipnifiunl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenhelly significant Wah Miapa4on Then sipmficant Nfi Im act Into orates Im act Im as 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the prolect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated wdh the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pen`ormance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () (~) ( ) b) Police protections () () (~) ( ) c) Schools () () () (~) d) Parks O O (~) O e) Other public facilities () () () (~) Comments• a) Fire protection service is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) Station 172 is located less than 2 miles from the proposed prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing • facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Development of the prolect site with the proposed prolect would incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services Adherence to requirements established by the RCFPD and payment of required development fees will reduce potential impacts related to the provision of fire protection services to a less than signfcant level b) Police protection service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is provided through contract by the San Bernardino County Sheriff (SBCSD) Surrounding areas contain existing development Development of the prolect site with the proposed prolect would incrementally increase the demand for police services Adherence to requirements established by the SBCSD and payment of required development fees will reduce potential impacts related to the provision of police protection services to a less than significant Ievei c) Central School District (K-t3) and Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract (9-12) serve the prolect area The proposed prolect is expected to generate approximately 65 new students for Central School District, and approximately 36 new students for Chaffey Joint Union High School District Currently, Central School District assesses a fee of $1 55 per square foot of residential development, and $0 25 per square foot commercial development' Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract currently assesses a fee of $1 02 per square foot of residential development, and $011 per square for square foot commercial developments Per California Government Code (§ 65995[h]), "The payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts on the provision of adequate school facilities " Upon payment of required fees, no impact related to the provision of school services will occur • ' Telephone conversation with Donna Rogers, Administrative Assistant, Central School Distract, January 21, 2005 e Telephone conversation with Denise Tiberi, Secretary, CJUH(S~D, January 21, 2005 Rev 1119/05 L i M fNl o, P i -1 3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 28 Lesa Tftan $ipmfiwnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Ppten4elly sipn,ncam Wipl lN4paspn Then sipn,ncam No Im as Inw oratetl Im ad Im as d) Please see responses 14(a) and (b) e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The protect will not require the construction of any new off-site facilities or alteration of any existing off-site facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City No signfcant impact associated with this issue will occur 14. RECREATION. Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () (/) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational faahties or O O (/) ( ) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments: a) The protect site is located in a developed area The nearest park is located less than one mile northwest of the protect site Because the proposed protect includes the development of housing units, it may increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities The developer will be required to meet park land requirements by payment of "in-lieu" fees The payment of fees will reduce potential recreation impacts to a less than significant level b) As discussed in the Land Use and Planning section of this initial study, the proposed protect site is proposed as a future community park m the City's General Plan Although the protect site is proposed as a future community park, SBCFCD offered the property to the Clty, which the City declined, citing lack of funds to develop it into parkland The loss of the protect site for parkland will not result in the City being unable to meet its parkland requirement of 5 acres per 1,000 residents Please refer to question 9b for the complete discussion of the loss of the protect site for future parkland The multifamily component of the proposed protect includes a pool with spa facility, tot lot, barbeque areas, open lawn area, and an exercise courseltogging path Because the proposed protect includes the development of housing units, it will cause an increase in population of the City, however, due to the relatively small size of the housing development, and the requirement of the developer to pay parkland fees, impacts to recreational facilities is considered less than signifcant • • Rev 1119/05 L! (~~1Ni ~l 1 1 Ct Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 29 • • Less men Sipn,ficent Leas Polen4elly WiVI Then Issues and Supporting Information Sources SiBmfimnt M,upaeon Sipreficenl No Im eq Inca oreteC Im eq Im aq 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the pro/ect a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in O U (~) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result m a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (~) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (~) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access O O O (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (~) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments• a-b) Based on the Traffic Study completed for the proposed protect, implementation of the proposed protect will generate 1,320 daily vehicle trips, with 131 trips occurring during the a m peak hour and 142 trips during the p m peak hour As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the City and surrounding area Based on the traffic study completed for the proposed protect, after development of the protect, all study intersections operate at satisfactory levels of service in both the a m and p m peak hours (opening day plus protect conditions) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local turisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement This protect will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated p Traffic Study ChurchMaven Residential and Office "Pro/ect, LSpA~Ass~ rates, January 2005 Rev 11/9/05 ~- ~ ~'~ f t / (~ r I t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga nRC9004-01197. DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 30 Less man Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially sianifiwnt WM1h Mingaaon Then s~enmaam Na Im ad Inca oretea Im ect Im ea c) Located approximately 3 5 miles north of the Ontario International Auport, the proposed prolect site is not wdhin the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticpated d) The proposed prolect is located in an area that is adjacent to existing development The prolect itself will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The prolect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or the perpetuation of farming uses The prolect will not, therefore, create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The prolect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The prolect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anhapated g) The prolect design includes, or the prolect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (~) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Regwre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (~) wastewater treatment faciities or expansion of existing faalities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Regwre or result in the construction of new storm () () () (~) water drainage facilities or expansion of existng facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) prolect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (~) provider, which serves or may serve the prolect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand m addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted O O O (~) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (~) regulations related to solid waste • • • Rev 11/9/05 ~iNl,N,01 P ~ ~~`' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 31 • Less man s~pnificant Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 relenaally Siprcfiwnl wU Ndepaeon roan SiBn'ficanl No Im ap Inm rataE Im a~i Im ad Comments• a) The proposed pro)ect well be served by the CVWD sewer system Waste water flows from the proposed on-site uses will be conveyed and treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) at the Regional Plant 4 (RP-4) treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity The pro)ect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB regarding wastewater No impact associated with this issue is anticipated b) The pro)ect is served by the CVWD water and sewer system The proposed pro)ect is expected to use an average of approximately 54,169 gallons (38,601 gallons of water for residential uses and 15,568 gallons of water for commercial uses) of water per day, with peak day usage estimated at approximately 108,338 gallons (77,202 gallons for residential uses and 31,136 gallons for commercial uses) The proposed pro)ect is expected to generate approximately 32,754 gallons (26,370 gallons per day for residential uses and 6,384 gallons per day for commercial uses) of sewage for disposal per day CVWD has indicated that it can provide water and sewer service to the site from existing infrastructure, therefore, no impact related to this issue will occur c) The proposed pro)ect includes the design and construction of an underground storm drain system to convey storm runoff to Deer Creek Channel The storm drain facilities will be designed to collect the runoff from a 100 year storm event A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Offcial and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits, therefore, no impact associated with storm water facilities are anticipated to occur d) Please refer to response 16(b) above The pro)ect is served by the CVWD water system CVWD has indicated that it can provide water service to the proposed pro)ect site from existing infrastructure Additionally, the proposed protect does not tugger the requirement (500 dwelling units) for preparation of a water supply assessment as set forth in Section 10910-10912 of the California Water Code The CVWD has established conditions that development pro/ects in its service area must meet and the RCFPD has established standards to satisfy fire flow requirements As compliance with the water service requirements (and payment of fees) of the CVWD and RCFPD is required to obtain water service, no impacts associated with water supply are anticipated e) The proposed pro)ect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill (Mid-Valley Landfill in Rialto) Based on a solid waste generation of 8 pounds per day ~er residential unit and 5 pounds per day per 1,000 square feet of commercial uses °, the proposed pro)ect is anticipated to generate approximately 467,200 pounds (233 6 tons) of waste per year (1,280 pounds/day ') The Mid-Valley Landfill has a daily permitted throughput of 7,500 tons per day The estimated closure date for the Mid-Valley Landfill is in 2033 Development of the proposed pro)ect • 10 City of Ranch Cucamonga General Plan Update Draff EIR, page 5 9-19 " (8 Ibslunitlday ^ 135 residential units = 1,080 Ibs/day for residential uses) + (5 Ibs/day/1,000 sq ft x 40,000 sq ft of commercial uses = 200 Ibs/day for commercial uses) = 1,280 Ibs/day • 365 days/year = 467,200 Ibs/yr Rev 1 vs/o5 Lr N1, N l O~ (~ I c -] Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 32 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Lees Than Sipmfirant Lass WN Then Miopeoon Sipnfiunl No will not significantly impact current operations or the expected lifetime of the landfill On- site uses will be regwred to comply with the City and State waste reduction and recycling standards No impact associated with solid waste disposal will occur g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (~) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the maior periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the protect have impacts that are mdroidually O O O (~) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have envvonmental effects that will O O O (~) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or mdirectly~ Comments. a) No endangered or threatened species were identified on-site during the general or focused biological reconnaissance of the protect site Due to the absence of any sensitive or speaal status species, the development of the proposed protect will not cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels Because of the nature of surrounding uses and the condition of on-site habitat, the development of the proposed on-site uses will not restrict the movemenUdistnbution of a rare or endangered species Potential impacts to turisdictional waters will be mitigated to a less than significant with adherence to Mitigation Measure 4-1 Because of the disturbed nature of the protect site, its past utilization as a detention basin, and the absence of any previous identified on-site historic, paleontological, or archeological, no impact to these resources wdl occur I~ b) The analysis prepared to support the proposed protect identified and addressed potential short- and long-tem impacts that would result from the construction and operation/occupation As stated in the preceding responses, the proposed on-site uses wdl not significantly impact noise levels or traffic conditions ether mdroidual or • cumulatively Because the pollutant emissions associated with the proposed protect ~,M,~l,~~P, ~~ Rev 11/9105 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 33 • would not exceed the SCAQMD's established daily emissions thresholds and no CO hot spots would occur, no impact on the attainment schedule of the AQMP would occur The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for sigmficant adverse environmental effects associated with future growth and development in the City The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects including air quality While mdigahon was identfied, potential air quality impacts remained significant The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) While the proposed protect includes a General Plan Amendment, the proposed development still fulfills policies identified in the General Plan including the promotion of residential mfill, the provision of a transition between commercial and lower density uses, and the provision of a variety of housing opportunities Furthermore, the proposed protect represents a logical pattern of development and is compatible with adjacent uses As such, the cumulative effects of the proposed pro/ect are anticipated to be no more significant than those identified in the General Plan EIR As the potential cumulative impacts associated with development are consistent with that associated with the General Plan, and because the City has previously overridden any significant impact assoaated with build out of the General Plan, the cumulative effects of the proposed protect are less than significant c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant • impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from av quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this pro/ect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Drnsion offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Draft (June 2001) REFERENCES • California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Adam P Fisher, Environmental Saentist, • Letter dated January30, 2006 Air Quality Impact Analysis, LSA Associates, Inc ,January 18, 2005 Draft Traffic Study Church/Haven Residential and Office Protect, LSA Associates, Inc , Rev 11/9/05 L,r'( ~NtQt\ ~ _`~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001, SUBTT17435 AND DRC2005-00071 Page 34 January 11, 2005 • • Delineation of Wetlands and Junsdictional Waters, LSA Assoaates, Inc ,November 8, 2004 • Focused Survey for the Burrowing Owl, LSA Associates, Inc ,August 2004 • Hydrology and Hydraulics Calculations, Development Resource Consultants, Inc ,July 2004 • Flood Control Permit Application, San Bernardino County Flood Control Distract, July 16, 2004 • Noise Impact Analysis, LSA Assoaates, Inc ,January 19, 2005 • Results of Biological/Regulatory Constraints Analysis, Glen Lukos Assoaates, April 29, 2004 • Uniform Application Part I, City of Rancho Cucamonga, November 15, 2004 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature= Date ~- />" c> ~ Pnnt Name and Title Z7 re c.~ ~ic.~ P p f~ ~ • • Rev 11/9/05 ~r~l~N/ ~ ~ I `~O • • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being arculated for public review m accordance with the California Environmental Oual~ty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197; Development Distnct Amendment DRC2005-00001; Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Development Review DRC2005-00071, and SUBTPM17460 Public Review Penod Closes: March 22, 2006 Project Name: Project Applicant: Pitassi Architects, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the south side of Church Street between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue - APN 1077-401-35 and 36 Protect Description: To Amend The General Plan Land Use Map From Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor to Mixed Use with a Master Plan designation, amending the Parks And Recreation chapter, and the Flood Hazards chapter, for the development of 9 single-family detached residences, 126 multi-family residential units (14 77 Acres), and 2 office bwldings (3 66 Acres) of one and two story design totaling 44,782 square feet on a total net site area of 14 31 acres, located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue The protect also includes an amendment to the Development District map changing the Flood Control zoning designation to Mixed Use as well as a request to subdwide the 14 77 gross acres of land into 10 numbered lots, and two lettered lots, for the sale of the residential condominium units and for the development review of those units and single family residences. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions m the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be regwred. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- . NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration dunng the review period. March 22. 2006 Lt ~tr N t ~j ) ~ ~ • RESOLUTION NO 06-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDINGAPPROVAL OF DRC2004-01197 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OPEN SPACE- FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORRIDOR TO MIXED USE, WITH A MASTER PLAN DESIGNATION, AMENDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION CHAPTER, AND THE FLOOD HAZARDS CHAPTER FOR 14 77 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET, BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 A Rentals 1 Pdassi Architects, Inc filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 14 77 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration located on the south side of Church Street, between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue and is presently vacant, undeveloped, and was previously used as a Flood Control Detention Basin Said property is currently designated as Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the east is designated Office Space and is vacant, and, the property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distract m a manner consistent with the General Plan and • with the related development, and L/~`'<<N O,~t ~t~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-20 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 12, 2006 Page 2 d This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives ofthe Land Use Element, • and e This amendment would not be materially intunous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subtect property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distract in terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, and c That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the • findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed in the Monitoring Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, in • ~,M,N,o;~ t o3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-20 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Apnl 12, 2006 • Page 3 accordance with the attached Draft City Counal Resolution including Exhibits A, B and C and in accordance with the condition listed below Plamm~g Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting ofthe Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS • ~tM,NI o,P,~~ ~~ • RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197, CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM OPEN SPACE-FLOOD CONTRODUTILITY CORRIDOR TO MIXED USE, WITH A MASTER PLAN DESIGNATION, AMENDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION CHAPTER, AND THE FLOOD HAZARDS CHAPTER FOR 14 77 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET, BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE,ANDMAKINGFINDINGSINSUPPORTTHEREOF-APN 1077- 401-35 AND 36 A Rentals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On Apnl 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No 06-20 recommending approval by the City Counal 3 On May 17, 2006, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that day 4 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Counal hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal during the above- referenced public hearing on May 17, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Counal hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 14 77 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration located on the south side of Church Street, between Haven Avenue and CenterAvenue and is presently vacant, undeveloped, and was previously used as a Flood Control Detention Basin Said property is currently designated as Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the east is designated Office • Space and is vacant, and, the property to the south is designated Industral Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park L, f`'l , N ~ QI~Q, l O j CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO "" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 17, 2006 Page 2 c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan • and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistentwith the General Plan and with the related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Councl during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed distract in terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative • Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council, and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed in the Monitoring Program attached and incorporated herein by this reference c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Tdle 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Councl finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in • Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~,~~ .N, pt (~'~, ~ ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO "" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-01197 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 17, 2006 • Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Counal hereby approves General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, including Exhibits A, B and C and in accordance with the condition listed below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution ~~~'~~~~Qf'P~ ~0~7 Haven and Church ~ DRC2004-01197 (GPA) D m z ® PROPOSED MIXED USE (MU) GENERAL PLAN ~L 0 LM M 500 0 500 1000 Feet CC <;~<~ GC asoso OPK IP . 0 FC f,*~-=1 OS TABLE 111-2B LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY- NON•RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS CITY AREA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TOTALS "°'~ Probable Target W Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Total Square Feet (in Owellrng (rn (rn Total Target Percenf ® Land Use Desr patrons Acrea a Dwelling Unrfs Qn thousands' thousands' Acrea a Unrts thousands' thousands' Acreage DUs o/ Total NON RESIDENTIAL ~ , L - uttice (4-1 0 FAR 128 - 2,230-5,575 2 230 Neighborhood Commercial (25- 35 167 1,819-2,546 , 1 819 128 4 FAR) , 167 5 Community Commercial (25- 35 109 -- 1,187-1,661 1 187 FAR , 109 3 General Commercial 25- 35 FAR 528 5,750-8,050 5 750 Recreation Commercial 25- 35 FAR) 9 -- 98-137 , 98 528 2 Subtotal 941 11,084-17,969 11,064 9 941 03 Mixed Use 25-1 0 FAR 685 - 11,905-34,185 16 361 3 Subtotal 685 11,905.34,185 , 16,361 685 685 2 Industrial Park (4- 6 FAR) 657 -- 11,448-17,171 11 448 2 Haven Overla 4-1 0 FAR 198 3,450-8,625 , 3,450 855 3 General Industrial 5- 6 FAR 2 016 43,908-52,690 43 908 Z Heav Industrial 4- 5 FAR) 904 15,751-19 689 , 15 751 2,016 6 Subtotal O en S ace 0- 1 du/ac 3,775 491 NA , 74,557.98,175 , 74,557 904 3,775 3 12 I Conservation 86 NA NA 2,512 0-158 3,003 158 10 Flood ControllUhlit Corndar 1 705 - NA NA 1,262 1,348 4 S b l , NA NA 1,928 -- 3 633 11 u tota 2,282 - 5 702 G CrviGRe tonal 4-1 0 FAR 166 - 2 892-7 231 2 892 , 7,981 25 Communit Colle a 1-2FAR) 191 -- , , 832-1,664 , 832 166 191 5 Elements School 1- 2FAR 169 736-1,472 736 169 6 5 High School 1- 2FAR 118 -- 514-1,028 514 118 4 Junior Hi h School 1- 2FAR 131 - 571-1,141 571 131 4 Park 371 - NA NA 371 1 Subtotal 1,146 5,545-12,536 5,545 1,146 4 Arterials/Freewa 4,063 - NA NA 100 - 4,613 13 Non-Residential Subtotal ,12,891 - 103,091.162,685 107,547 5,802 18,694 59 GRAND TOTAL 24,600 32,692=(17,387 103,091x182,685 107;547 7,152 198-2,924 31,742 55,749 100 Rannn n( en, o.e r....,~..e .~ ue ...,.d..,., . ,r .-.,.e..,.,_ .. ___- __., ..__ _. _,. _, _• - - - . .. .. x ~ -_..,,, -• --._-•- •~~•~y~ •~ •~ ~., r~..,.,.,., .., p,waum ~NVc, a„~ unesiwm of nnensry range mmnpnee oy me numoer of acres, antl muntletl to [he whole number Target intensity is the pmbable level of development ~ Nan-residential FAR Range lower number is the probable FAR on average but in some cases it may be lower Higher number is the maximum FAR for any specdic protect Mixed Use allows both revdenual antl non-residental uses Table III-ia reflects the residential potential Table III-1b inda:ates non-residential potential s Dwelling units, not square Footage Open space is the only non-residential category that permits residential units Numbers of units are maximum yield based on a target of 62 5°/ of the range The Open e pace desgnation within the Qty area is appbed only to existing golf courses Residential potential is therefore consitlered zero Percentages have been rounded to equal 100 • • r ~t~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN W TABLE III-28 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY- NON-RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS CITY AREA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TOTALS W Probable Target Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Total Square Feet (m Dwelling lm (m Total Target Percent =~ Land Use Desr nations Acreage Dwellm Unlfs In thousands' thousands)' Acrea a Unrfs thousands' thousands)' Acreage DUs of Total NON-RESIDENTIAL _~ _Z _Q ~~ Office 4-1 0 FAR 128 2 230-5,575 2,230 128 4 Neighborhood Commercial (25- 35 FAR 167 -- 1,819-2,546 1,819 167 5 Community Commercal (25- 35 FAR 109 -- 1,187-1,661 1,187 109 3 General Commercial 25- 35 FAR 528 5,750-8,050 5,750 528 2 Recreation Commercal 25- 35 FAR 9 98-137 98 9 03 Subtotal 941 11,084-17,969 11,084 941 3 Mixed Use (25-1 0 FAR 665 -- 11,905.34,185 16,361 685 2 Subtotal 665 11,90534,185 16,361 685 2 Industrial Park (4- 6 FAR) (Haven Overlay 4-1 0 FAR) 657 198 -- 11,448-17,171 3,450-8,625 11,448 3,450 855 3 General Industrial 5- 6 FAR 2,016 43,908-52,690 43,908 2,016 6 Hea Industrial (4- 5 FAR 904 -- 15,751-19,689 15,751 904 3 Subtotal 3,775 74,557-98,175 74,557 3,775 12 O en S ace 0- 1 du/ac 491 NA NA NA 2,512 0-158 3,003 158 10 Conservation 86 NA NA 1,262 1348 4 Flood Control/Uhlit Corridor 1,705 -- NA NA 1,928 3,633 11 Subtotal 2,282 -- 5,702 7,981 25 CiviGRe tonal 4-1 0 FAR 166 2,892-7 231 2,892 166 5 Communal Colle e 1- 2 FAR 191 832-1,664 832 191 6 Elements School (1- 2 FAR) 169 736-1,472 736 169 5 High School 1- 2 FAR 118 -- 514-1,028 514 118 4 Junior Hi h School 1- 2 FAR 131 571-1,141 571 131 4 Park 371 NA NA 371 1 Subtotal 1,146 5,545-12,536 5,545 1,146 4 Arterials/Freewa 4,063 NA NA 100 4,613 13 Non-Residential Subtotal 12,891 -- 103,091.162,885 107,547 5,802 18,694 59 GRAND TOTAL 24,600 32,692.67„387 103,091.162,685 107,547 7,152 198-2,924 31,742 55,749 100 Rance nr srnure Innlano is the nrndurl of nrobahle uoner and threshold of mlensdv ranee mu lhohed by the number of acres and rounded to the whole number ~ Target mtensity is the probable level of development 'Non-residential FAR Range lower number is the probable FAR on average, but in some cases it maybe lower Higher number is the maximum FAR for any specific protect ° Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential uses Table III-ta reflects the residential potential, Table III-1b mdicates non-residential potential s Dwelling units, not square footage Open space is the only non-residential category that permits residential units Numbers of units are maximum yield based on a target of 62 5 % of the range The Open Space tlesignation within the Qty area is applied only to existing golf wurses Residential potential is therefore considered zero e Percentages have been rounded to equal 100 _ Pnge /II-20 I IPLANNINGLLARRy1GENERAL PLANIFinaI 2003 GP LU Master Report docrev4-i6 doc The Plnnnrng Cenlet 2.5.3.6 Mixed Use (Probable FAR of 0.40 and . Maximum FAR of 1.0) The purpose of the Mixed-Use designation in the General Plan is to stimulate and gwde development in speaal opportunity areas where land use change is desired Mixed Use development may occur in two ways 1) as a combination of uses in a single development protect on a single parcel of land, or 2) as a combination of uses on multiple parcels within a specified district of the City In either case, the intent is to achieve a complete integration of the uses and their support functions into a common concept The effect of mixed-use development in the nine opportunity areas in which it is applied is to create speaal urban places within the general suburban pattern of single uses somewhat isolated from each other While such a mixture would not be feasible over extensive portions of the City, it can be desirable within limited, focused areas The expectations commonly required of mixed use developments through site planning, design, and use configuration is that they 1 Provide safe and convenient pedestrian movement into and within the site 2 Provide uses that are interconnected rather than being rigidly separated 3 Include uses that are highly urban in character, with . generally higher intensities of use than in surrounding areas 4 Contain usable public open space that is highly accessible and convenient to residents and visitors 5 Express a common design theme that may be carried out by architectural styles, landscaping and lighting treatment, street improvements and street furniture, or other means of unifying the development This does not precluded an eclectic mix of architectural styles, only that the development be tied together in its physical form by some means 6 Involve a variety of scales and spaces to provide interest and diversity in the environment being created 7 Include an integrated arculation system of arterial access, internal arculation, parking facilities, pedestrian pathways, bicycle routes, transit stops (where applicable), and related signage It is intended that movement within the entire opportunity area be feasible on site without being forced to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Page III-30 The Planning Censer P ICRA-01 OGIMan;h 2002 Frnal GPIGP LU Masfe~ Repotl for pnnGny doc October 17, 1001 use adtacent arterial highways to move to other portions of d-use development h • e mixe t 8 Exhibit considerable flexibility in design in achieving EXHIBIT B-2 ~-/MfNf~IPi ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Pagelll-30 The Plann/ng Center P ICRA-07 OGIMarch 2002 Fina/ GPIGP LU Master Report /or pnn6ng doc October 17, 2001 use adjacent arterial highways to move to other portions of the mixed-use development 8 Exhibit considerable flewbility in design in achieving maximum site potential and sensitivity to adjacent uses 9 Apply CPTED (Came Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles to provide both the reality and perception of public safety 10 Provide a unique and engaging experience for both residents and visitors, similar to those often found in older aUes Each application of the Mixed-Use designation on the Land Use Plan has a specific intent Therefore, the gwdance for each one is tailored to that area Aland use table is provided for each mixed-use designation to establish the uses to be permitted and the general area to be devoted to each use Flexibility is provided in the ranges to permit combinations of uses at a variety of overall Intensities Unless otherwise speafied, the most intensive combination is the most desirable The six areas designated for Mixed-Use development under these provisions of the General Plan are 1 The Regional Center area, bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, I-15 and the Day Creek Flood Control Channel, 2 A "Town Center" node at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, 3 The north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Hellman, 4 The western entrance to the City along Foothill Boulevard in the area generally know as Bear Gulch, 5 The Terra Vista Mixed Use Area, located along Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, and 6 The Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18, generally located west of Milliken Avenue, south of the railroad tracks, north of 4v, Street, and east of Utica Avenue 7. The Foothill Boulevard -Cucamonga Channel Area, located at the base of "Red Hill," located near the Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. 8. This Historic Alta Loma -Amethyst Site, on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and the original commercial center. 9. The Haven and Church site, located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. Once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin, the site was declared surplus because of drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became available for private development. EXHIBIT B-3 L/M,NIo-G'r~~~~_ III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY 2.5.5.7 Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site This 7 24-acre site is significant within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Districts At the southern base of "Red HIIi," the site is strategically located near the northwest corner Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue Like other newly designated Mixed Use districts, this site presents an opportunity to expand commercial office activity, while providing an opportunity for new multi-family development in the Clty The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area TABLE III-f0 ~....~.~... on~ncvnvn_r11rnMONGACHANNELSITE Medium Residential 0%-100% I 0-724 acres (8 14 Dwelling Units Per Acre)` I 0 7 24 acres Office _ ._ __-' 0 / 100 / I This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium reign nesiae~i a t ...o~ .r .io"oi~~Pd m conjunction with a Senror Housing Overlay District (SHOD) 2.5.5.8 Historic Alta Loma -Amethyst Site This is a relatively small (3 24 acres), but significant, site within the historic Afta Loma commercial area Once the location of a large citrus packing house, the site, now vacant, Is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and original commercial center This vacant parcel presents an opportunity to bring new activity into the historic town center either with new commercial office ventures, or with new multiple family developments, possibly aimed to provide housing for our growing senior citizen population The following table specifies the uses and range of development that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area TABLE 111-11 ALTA LOMA AMETHYST MIXED-USE Land Use Mrx % Ran a Acrea a Ran e Medium-High Residential 0% -100% 0 - 3 24 acres 14-24 dwelljn units er acre Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3 24 acres Page /II-43 Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan rl NNINGV.1RaYiC1ENERAL PIAMFina12003 GP L[I Mawr October 17, 2001 Lt A.~ r lC 11 OI D I 1 ~ e:ten a°~n.aie a°° EXHIBIT B-4 t l lV ~ 2.5.5.9 Haven, and Church Site This 14.77-acre site is located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues. Once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin, the site was declared surplus because of drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became available for private development. The site represents a transition area between single family residential to the north and west and mdustriaUinstitutional (CVWD Maintenance and Office Facility) to the south and future Office uses across haven to the east The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. TABLE Ill-12 HAVEN AND CHURCH -FLOOD CONTROL BASIN Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 10.95 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre ' Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3 36 acres ' This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). I \PLANNING\LARRY\HAVEN AND CHURCH\GPA SUB area Description doc EXHIBIT B-5 l..,M,~/,c7,f', qty III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY Clty ojRancho Cucamonga Genera! Plan October 17, 2001 Page III-141 P ICIU-01 OGUrarch 1003 Fmd GAGP LU Mw'trr Rcport far pnn6ng doc Various youth sports leagues have been assigned fields at particular schools for games and practice This has been necessary because there are not enough athletic fields at City parks to accommodate the large number of children participating m orgarnzed sports Although the City is not party to the use agreements between schools and sports leagues, we can and have provided support to the organizations in seeking point-use agreements and improvements to the school sites Our City maintains a park standard of five (5) acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents Pursuant to Government Code Section 66477, also known as the Quimby Act, we are able to collect three (3) acres of parkland or in-lieu fees from new residential subdivision, for every 1,000 residents Pursuant to the Quimby Act, we have adopted a Local Park Ordinance (Ord No 105) that contains the provisions and procedures for implementing park and recreational land dedication requirements In order to reach our objective or standard of five acres per 1,000 residents, we must pursue alternative funding sources for adding park acreage and/or park improvements Such sources include general fund revenues, developer impact fees, state and federal grants, user group contributions, and school district toint-use contributions Other methods for supplementing our park system include encouraging the development of pnvate open space and recreational amenities (beyond public park regwrements) to be incorporated in large residential protects We should also seek to improve access and facilities at local school sites so schools can handle a greater demand for certain activities such as sports leagues School grounds and facilities are an important part of our recreational system and can be counted, to a limited degree, towards meeting our parkland standard We are currently and will continue to pursue the toint-use (or ultimate use) of utility district lands, for both parks and trails uses. EXHIBIT B-6 ~-/~~~~'/o,~l "~ • 'u ~ r~ y .. r 11 C a / Q O ~ ¢ ~ C YIl ^ j ° L ~ a ~t~ ~ z s O U r 5~ ^ v ,..1 ~ N N ' ~ c V y s~~ a A D fi u ~ b [: R ~ µj G F[.'+` _ O m F ' a U E S 55? p, - ~ ~ W J qq y S_ K a S Q L 3 a~ g a ~ ®© ©®~® ~ d °_ E N ~ ~I • • EXHIBIT C 3Atl tlONtllv1113 spy 3AV N3NIllIW 3AV N3AtlN 3Atl tl50Wtl3H 3Atl Oltl3lH~tltl 3AV Nb'Yf1l3N ~ M~ N,~j ~ ~~ ~ - C Y _ _ > - `o_ v J ~ = z _ i~ ~ = C !, = I x U u L Y ~ 6 C ~ ~ Q ~ n U n A ~, v ;~ F = a - i 2 i 5~ _ Y u a °a a ~ u ~ E e ~ - a„~ _ o a 3 e ~~ ~~1~ ~ ~ M1 5 N - ee ~t~ei 1. ~'~`vT[e t~i'i j-~~1'.~ i ~~~T j~~i J;,ii+"~ '-"•'~t: r- a - jjSTi.i:. +s'a iid+ E1'~i i5 ~~ S'iaii i~ .;SiI 6~Se•j S ~+iie~tT '• {ie~€: °~.~ii' .S~L+`is ~: i.~ ;tI 2e~a li ~d EXHIBIT C-1 ~~MiN,Di$~ 1~~1 t7 p~ ~~4 " a aaad~ S ~ 1 i z ~ l7C l - ~f - m ~ ~ X w ~ ~ ~ ~ - -~ C4 W > Z ~ m . u W O =~ S J v NO O ° I ao 3Atl tlONVM113 S L-I 3AV N3NIllIW 3AV N3AVH 3AV VSOWY3H 3AV ON81H~Eltl 3AV NVVf1l3H • • • r "' _ a ~ O c < ~ m x • m x _ -------- ---~ ~ - l------, ( -~ -- r ( W ~ ( ~ ( ~ ~ 1 ( Fhwd Hazmd~ J ~ II ~ E~lubu \"-~ ~l I ~~ I ~ I `', HILLSIDE AVE O I I I I N ~ ~ ~ I 24th BT BANYAN ST ~~^ ~ ',~ 1 FOOTHILL ISR b) FREEWAY Imn sT ? 845E UNE RD , ~ ~~ ~ BABE LINE RD z ~-~ oo a o /~ FOOTHILL BLVD ~ IIr-~``` ~ FOOTHILL BLVD `v ~~~~ ~ BPe ual Flaod Hazard Neas ~~~/// Inundalad by 100 Yaar Flootl r Aqq OW RT O f / PAROw RT ~ ~ ~ Itllfl// a gsm sr a 0 a <9 c~ w ul 5 41b BT . W N z Z Z~ Q Y Q ~ W,mY.elmluM1 W I L 2 S ~ ~ ~ F.x G • ]-JO 1 W-m (1h of Rnnrho(Lcqunmsft (,ENEK-~L PLAN • RESOLUTION NO 06-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FLOOD CONTROL TO MIXED USE FOR 14 77 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 A Recitals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc filed an application for Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Distract Amendment is referred to as 'Yhe application " 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No 06-20 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 be approved 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 14 77 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration located on the south side of Church Street, between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue and is presently vacant, undeveloped, and was previously used as a Flood Control Detention Basin Said property is currently designated as Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the east is designated Office Space and is vacant, and the property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park . c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and (.~ ~t ,N~ ~ .~ (~, \ 19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-21 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 12, 2006 Page 2 • This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be materially in~unous or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial ewdence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mtigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no ewdence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations . 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-21 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Apnl 12, 2006 • Page 3 DRC2005-00001 in accordance with the attached Draft Ordinance and Exhibits A and B and in accordance with the condition shown below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th, day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS I Z 1 L,M,N~©~~ 1 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00001 TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO MIXED USE FOR 14 77 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 A Recitals 1 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No 06-21, recommending that the City Counel of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Draft Ordinance 2 On May 17, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance The City Counctl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1 This City Council hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct SECTION 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 17, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 14 77 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration located on the south side of Church Street, between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue and is presently vacant, undeveloped, and was previously used as a Flood Control Detention Basin Said property is currently designated as Open Space-Flood Control/Utility Corridor, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-faintly residential, the property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the east is designated Office Space and is vacant, and the property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park c This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pollees of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the distract, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DEVELOPMENT DISTRIC AMENDMENT - DRC2005-00001 May 17, 2006 Page 2 This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element, and e This amendment would not be materially incurious or detrimental to the adcacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties, and SECTION 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Councl finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated there under, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent cudgment of the City Council, and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negatroe Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations SECTION 4 The Development Distracts Map is hereby amended to change from Flood Control to mixed use for 14 77 acres of land, located on the south side of Church Street between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A and B" and in accordance with the condition shown below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any LtNi,N, ptP~ 1 23 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DEVELOPMENT DISTRIC AMENDMENT - DRC2005-00001 May 17, 2006 Page 2 Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition SECTION 5 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the deasion of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such deasion or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation SECTION 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and arculated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California L~ L,rt,N,o,P ~1~ti Haven and Church ~ DRC2005-000001 (DDA) D m z ;~~~ PROPOSED MIXED USE (MU) ZONING ~L 0 LM M 500 0 500 1000 Feet CC 0 GC OPK • IP 0 FC OS ~XHf~IT ~, M,N, o, Q, ~~~~ Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Seaton 17 08 030 Land Use Mtx Percent Range Acreage Range Medium-High Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 3 24 acres Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3 24 acres The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in Development Code Chapters 17 08 and 17 10 All uses that may be authorized under the Office designation are subject to Conditional Use Permit approval The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17 08 and 17 10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable within the Mixed Use Distract 2 Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue Site This 31 5 acre site is located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site- Land Use Mtx Percent Range Acreage Range High Residential 40% - 45% 12.6 -14 2 acres Office 55% - 60% 17 3 - 18 9 acres The land use categories within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined m Development code Chapters 17 08, 17 10, and 17 30 All uses and actmties that are permitted, or may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, under the High Residential, Office/Professional, General Commercial, and Industrial Park designations are subject to the same permitting processes and development standards as listed in Chapters 17 O6, 17 10, and 17 20, shall be applicable to any development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site 3 Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site This 7 24-acre site is located at the base of "Red Hill" on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and the Cucamonga Channel The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medum Residential 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre ' Office 0% - 100% 0 - 7.24 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17 08, 17 10, and 17 32 All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to a Conditional Use Permit approval The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17 O8, 17 10, and 17 32 for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District " • This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medum-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) it developed m conjunction with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) • EXHIBIT B 1708i'_ M,,v,o,P,- Z~° y04 Rancho Cucamon a Develo merit Code Section 17 08 040 • 4 Haven. Church and Center Site: This 14 77-acre site is located on the south side of Church Avenue, between Center and Haven Avenues The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site. Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Range Range Medium Residential 0%-100% 0 -10.95 acres 8-14 dwellin units er acre Office 0% -100% 0 - 3.36 acres The land use categories proposed within the Mixed Use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the Development Code Chapters 17.06, and 17.10. All uses that may be authorized under office designations are subject to Development Code Chapter 17.10. The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17.08, and 17.10, for each permitted land use shall be applicable to the development within the Mixed Use District, or shall be subject to a Master Plan of Development approved by the Planning Commission specifically for this site. ' This Mixed Use site may be considered with a base zoning of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). Section 17.08.040 -Site Development Criteria The Site Development Criteria are intended to provide minimum standards for residential development These site development standards should be used in contunction with the design gwdelines which are set forth in Section 17 08 090 of this chapter This section shall not be construed to supersede more restrictive site development standards contained in the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions of any property or dwelling unit However, in no case shall private deed restrictions permit a lesser standard in the case of a minimum standard of this section or permit a greater standard in the case of a maximum standard of this section A Development Standards The development standards for residential development are arranged into two categories (1) basic development standards, and (2) optional development standards These standards are used in contunction with the Absolute Policies and Design Gwdelines during the residential land developmenUdesign review process as discussed in Chapter 17 06 Each residential development must conform to either the basic standards or the optional standards Basic Development Standards These standards are intended to provide basic standards, which wail ensure good quality and compatible protects A residential development over four units per acre is generally limited to the mid-point of the density range for which it is designated These standards, as well as the density limitation, are intended to create a development, which will be compatible and provide for proper transitions from more sensitive or less intense residential development 2 Optional Development Standards These standards are intended to provide high standards for the development of protects of superior quality and compatibility The optional standards allow development at the higher end of the designated density range However, the standards and development expectations have been increased . above and beyond the basic standards in order to ensure proper transitions and buffers from lower intense residential uses 04103 17 08-11 L,rit iN,ol PI )z~ • RESOLUTION NO 06-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 14 77 GROSS ACRES OF LAND INTO 10 NUMBERED LOTS AND 2 LETTERED LOTS FOR THE SALE OF 135 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (MIXED USE DISTRICT PROPOSED), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET, BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 A Recitals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 request is referred to as "the application " 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred . B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the south side of Church Street, between Center Avenue and Haven Avenue, with a street frontage of 463 feet on Haven Avenue and lot depth of 1,234 feet along Church Avenue and is presently improved with an abandoned retention basin, and, b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the east is designated Office Space and is vacant, and the property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 • and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ~,r2~~v,c~,P,~z~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 2 • a That Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b The design or improvements of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is phy~~cally suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and Tentatrve Tract Map SUBTT17435 is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows . a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared, therefore, reflect the independent judgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mformation provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~, N1, rv, SIP , ~ ~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 • Page 3 Planning Department 1) Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 is granted subiect to approval and adoption by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 and Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00001 Engineering Department 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Mator Divided Highway" standards as required and including (7 1/2-foot median, 12 feet, 1 l feet, 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane and 11-foot bus bay south of Church Street or 7 1/2 -foot median, 13 feet, 11 feet, 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane mid-block) a) Provide a bus bay/deceleration/right-turn lane on Haven Avenue to entrance b) Revise traffic signing and striping and protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Haven Avenue, as required c) Protect or provide additional Traffic Signal equipment, as regwred and in accordance with Focused Traffic Study • 2) Chu rch Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, and drive approach as required b) Provide traffic signing and striping and protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Church Street as regwred c) Re-stripe Church Street to provide left turn pockets at proiect entrances at Marine and Camilla Avenues d) Protect or replace existing Traffic Signal equipment as required 3) Center Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Co llector" standards as regwred and including a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights and street trees, as required b) Protect R26 "No Parking" signs along Center Avenue, as required c) Revise traffic signing and striping, as required A d) venue- No residential driveways to Center L~h1,Nt0/Pr t3~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 4 • 4) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 fCV electrical) on the opposite side of Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever comes first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted umt amount times the length of the protect frontage from the center of Church Street and Haven Avenue to the center of Church Street and Center Avenue 5) All service utility lines crossing Church Street shall be undergrounded 6) Provide a 25-foot wide public storm dram easement for the proposed storm drain Provide a blanket access easement over the remainder parcel for City maintenance crews to access manholes Also provde a private storm drain easement for that portion of storm drain that serves Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435 over the remainder parcel 7) Dedicate vehicle restriction rights to the City except at location approved with the Development Site Plan 8) BMPs proposed in the Water Quality Management Plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer 9) As required by the City Engineer, install and/or coordinate with City +, capital improvement protect the installation of public improvements along the north side of Church Street from Cornell Court to easterly boundary of Church Street Park Improvements may include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, street pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, street lights, and any private improvements to restore adjacent properties Also install traffic signal for the intersection of Church Street and Center Avenue All improvements are eligible for Transportation fee credit and or reimbursement Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction egwpment will be . utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction ~, r-~ „~v , o, P~ - 3 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 5 measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall complywith SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403) 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use ~~''`i,N,o,P,,3z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 6 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs requinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be requred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules m conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources 1) Prior to the commencement of protect grading, the protect applicant shall submit evidence to the City that all permit regwrements mandated by the U S Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, have been satisfied Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions i ~,Nt ~N totP~ -33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 7 Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post-Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a prolect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent L,1`-),Nlpl Q~ 1 3y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 8 • practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permd Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Offiaal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Operational Nose 5) Minimum sound wall height required for aground-floor backyard/patio is 8 feet forthe following buildings along Church Street Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 . L-r}~~~J,c~y{~, 13S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17435 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 9 • 6) A 5-foot sound wall is recommended for balconies assoaated with the following buildings along Church Street that are directly exposed to Church Street traffic Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 Balconies outside of 500 feet from the Church Street centerline or those that are blocked by the intervening structures (including those on the sides of the bwlding faang away from Church Street) do not need balcony walls 7) Bedrooms in Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 that are within 382 feet of the Church Street centerline and directly exposed to traffic regwre a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system 8) Bedrooms in Buildings 4 through 7 that are within 792 feet of the Haven Avenue centerline and directly exposed to the traffic requue a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS L,N,,yJ,o~P,,3to Project File No.: DRC2005-00001, SUBTPM17460 PROGRAM • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Development Review DRC2005-00071, and This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 L-r N1 ~ N, 0 ~ f ; l 37 Mitigation Monitoring Program General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tract Map Subtt17435, Development Review DRC2005-00071, and SUBTPM17460 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reportmg Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reportmg Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise regwring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances regwring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitonng/reportmg plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits • ~-rM,lv'~O~ I~ , X38 • i MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Design Review DRC2005-00071, and Development Dlstnct Amendment DRC2005-00001 Applicant: Pltassl Architects Initial Study Prepared by: L J Henderson AICP, Principal PlannerDate February 14, 2006 . . .. . . . ~ .. .. . ~ i~ ,f •„_ Av Ouahry. ,- r r ~ • ~ : ,~„a~:z: . , ~, ,' ~, . -,'~ ~.~ ., , ar _' _ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2l4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verrficahon Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD) as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC 2l4 performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 r ~_ S V 1 of 8 .. .. -. ~. .. All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAOMD BO C Review of plans AIC 214 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally,' contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans A/C 2l4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2l4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 exposed excavated soil durng and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material m BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound ' engineering practices ~ Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 ~ by the Cdy if silt is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of G construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C Dunng A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions _r f ~$ • r _~ ... -. • ~. .. The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement thatwork crews will shut off equipment when not in use All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial faalities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2l3 more employees shall be regwred to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 ' more employees shall be regwred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high efficiencyllow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Revew of plans C 2l4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biologlcal'~Re§ourees:;;.'. ~":r.'.: "-,;:.~ :`~`e,f~~c.~ c~.~;^ z~:~=° ;"c~i:r+ '~~,~-~~4~`:: " 1=,.=r~,..a:'~ ~~:.~,:az , -.~, t : -'-' ` '~ - ~°s ~' - - Prior to the commencement of protect grading, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 protect applicant shall submit evidence to the City that ail permit requirements mandated by the U S Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, have been satisfied 3 of 8 r ~' C .C f .. ... -. -. .,y- 3. , ~ 11 P~: Y 1• E .- a:. :#r•a .,~u,~, Geologyand~Sods ~k~Wt lf~i E"~• +~tiG ...,Z ~,.,;, 3, 'Y4 •~"n~v-fi sr. >ry,M1i~ a. ,~,-r~ ;~ 3 \~'M1id M' ifA Fk ~.tV ck.~~?~ ' fit • ~ ~p } ~ a~;x x+4Y•~~'r" J'^ ~~ }~ aSa,~~.. ^ 2"~at~~,~ - ,- _. , _ r ~ _ . ~- a ,~ , The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C Dunng A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction ~ areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 1 4 Cry '. 'K N> -~ 11 . t. `! c ivri ,, ' ,: £H drolo y and N/ater Qual ty ~ ~ ~ ~ •• : f ` :' >. t Y . ' ~f.' ; ~ ~ s i ' ri +,- 't ~ s';;'•-r ~ - H> ^a.' r i J .i _-.. µ M ~ =,<<=;. r'Mi >`!('v.di . '~ t~•i - ~C • ~ : : - r14nr`- ~ -' <; ~ ' ,, y g , i , , ,,. ; , .. ; ; ~ , ~ • , _ , ~ Prior to issuance of grading permds, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical • ~$ _r 7 L .. ... -. -. .. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on- siteand off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing achvdies are radiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the sde Insert other speafic BMPs from WOMP CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2l4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (name/date) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 5 of 8 .. _ ~ • ~ • ~ . .. ... ' , • ~. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/q controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water ? Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines :~ for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 ~ Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/CID Revew of plans AIC 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permd '~ „L;-<'~ ~'~„ •~z{~i:- _ ,Noi§e`r''~*,:'~~w- ~ r~"w.~. ,~~*~~~°," - £~~' ;,:• : , ~ ~ ,;.: r-- ~' ~b::~z~-c 1 ss.~ .. , _ t - . ~3 ~ j , ~ ~ _ _ , M Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C Dunng A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 6of8 i ~i ~ ... .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bulding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above r standards, then construction activities shall be reduced 7 in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise -' standards or halted Z The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A ~j as possible m the first phase construction ~ Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 ~ hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Minimum sound wall height regwred for aground-floor CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 backyard/patio is 8 feet for the following bwldings along Church Street Buldings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21 A 5-foot sound wall is recommended for balconies CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 assoaated with the following buildings along Church Avenue that are directly exposed to Church Avenue traffic Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21 Balconies outside of 500 feet from the Church Avenue centerline or those that are blocked by the intervening structures (including those on the sides of the building facing away from Church Street) do not need balcony walls 7 of 8 f-- Key to Checklist Abbrevtatlons 7 _~ d L .Responsible'Person-.' ~ ~'~;'• .{~~•-- Monitoring Frequency~.~'.;:;' • =Mlethod of.Ve_rification:•~ . -_ _- _ . r. Sanctions - CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B - Olher Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Cdy Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C -Plan Check 3 - W rthhold Certficate of Occupancy BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Ober PO -Police Captain or designee E - Operaflng 5 -Retain Deposd or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP ~ 7 -Citation i \planningUary~haven and church\final subtt17435 mmchklst-rev6-8-05final doc ~8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT17435 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC LOCATION: HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET - APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any actton brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appltcant shall reimburse the City its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such actton The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such actton but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Tract No SUBTT17435 is granted subject to the approval of DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001 and DRC2005-00071 B. Time Limits 1 Thts tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 2 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subfect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering • Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning SC-1-OS 1 ~-r Nl , N t Ot ~> ~ `"~ 7 Completion Date -~-~- ~ ~ I I Protect No SUBTT17435 Comolelion Date Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior arculation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas E. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of 5495 prior to the issuance of budding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE. ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. Site Development Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracUparcel map recordation and poor to issuance of budding permts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on Church Street 33 total feet on Center Avenue 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Center Avenue, Church Street, and Haven Avenue 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to ail parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, where no map is involved SC-1-OS / I / / / /_ - - / / / / _/_/_ I / / / / I / / • 4M,N, o,P, ~~~ Protect No SUBTT17435 Completion Date 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring Ioint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 7 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 8 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs 9 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Church Street from Cornell Court to easterly boundary of Church _ _.._ ____ .__i..a......,u ,.,,h6r,mnrnvamantS shall he H. Street Improvements . 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X X C X X X X (e) Church Street X X X X X X Center Avenue X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Bus Bay 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety light; on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civi Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall bt SC-1-05 3 f~~i,Nto,Pl~+9 / / -/-/- / / I / I I / I Protect No SUBTTt7435 Comolehon Date posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to f irst final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _I_/_ Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _!_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program SC-1-05 ~-, r~-~,rv, o~P, ~s c~ Protect No SUBTT17435 Completion Date 5 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as fo~ows The completed • legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall Include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be Installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Protect Engineer Mm Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Slze Qty Cenler Avenue Brachychiton popuheus Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 Gal FIII m Church Sveet P A 8' or greater Magnolia grandiFlora NCN 8' 30' O C 15 'Samuel Sommef P A Less than 8' Magnolia grandigora NCN 3' 20'O C 15 Gal 'St May Haven Avenue Foreground P A 8' or greater Magnolia grandifio2 NCN 8' 60' O C 15 Gal Generally in front of 'Majestic Beauty Intentionally sidewalk spaced this far apart P A less than 8' Magnolia grandigora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal 'St Mary' Pnmary tree in Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree B' 25' O C 15 Gal masses, mainly informal if behind sidewalk mamtamed by City Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, Including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue i S~-,~5 / / / / -/-/- -/-/- ~,N~,N/O~~t~sl Protect No SIiBTT17435 Completion Date K. L. Drainage and Flood Control 1 The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection _/_/~ measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed _/_/_ from the project area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection faalities The developer's engineer shall prepare ail t " " ion designa X sufficient to obtain an unshaded necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall uance of building permits th _/_I_ , e iss approval or be installed as required by the City Engineer 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adtacent areas 5 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is regwred for work within its _/_I_ right-of-way Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility bl _/_/_ e electric power, telephone, and ca Standards Easements shall be provided as required / /~ 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary - - 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the t (CVW D) t t D _/_/_ , is ric er Cucamonga Valley Wa Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required poor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first ter district within 90 days prior to final map approval th b e wa y Such letter must have been issued in the case of subdrvision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects q Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved uirements that may be received from _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any req them General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwidmg permd issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall osit is fully refundable if m The de P _/_/_ p rogra be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to rst building permit application is submitted to Building and f th h i e en the Engineering Department w Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction andlor demolition protect . SC-1-05 6 L,fr-1~N,O,P,~52 Protect No SUBTT17435 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION ~LANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • Sc-~ -os 7 ~-~ ~.,) ~ Ntp~t 1 S 3 ,,,,,• . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection - District - Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 8, 2005 Church & Haven MFR Subdivision Multi-Family Tentative Tract & Design Rewew SUBTT17435 & DRC2005-00071 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Pnvate Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fue hydrants in commeraalhndustrial projects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is ' 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall faang the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commeraal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible F d f h e ire s o t iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational nee D~stnct t., r•~,Iv, o, P ~~ ~ iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct v A minimum of forty-feet (40 feet) from any building If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided g. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station monitonng This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for structures located m the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provde the requred fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fue hydrants on ad,acent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 4. Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire spnnkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 Multifamily structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Multi-family residential structures m excess of 4 units 3 All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access) 2 ~,N~,~~a,p~~ss 4 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure 5 When the building access does not meet the regwrements of the 2001 California Bwlding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #F191 10 20 6 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwlding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2 Pnor to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and speafications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire Distract Site Access Fue District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets dnve aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 151 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the • exterior of the bulding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire Distract access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radws shall be 50-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the mirnmum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) z ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred bwlding exterior openings 5 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design regwrements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are regwred to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before plaang the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan . review 4 4Nt.N~b~ P ~s~ FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to fife or property Compressed Gases Public Assembly Cryogenics LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Welding and Cutting Operations Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bulding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk • Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased orooertv which is regwred to submit a Plan, is also regwred to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subiect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous matenals in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 revew fee FCS-14 Map Recordation . 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access ~-./ 1`'1, ~ r ~t 158 a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or • c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire Distract The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subtect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire Distract access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a • regwred private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adtacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation, or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the prvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities Distract #85-1 or #88-1 is regwred pnor to the issuance of grading or bwlding permds • L.,M,N,o,Q ,IS`~ Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services wdl perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services"'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of . Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location ~-'/r~~Ni otT . `~~ 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, m the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 The CCBR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, speafy the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 10 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 11 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercal/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, wsible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial bwldings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shalt be provided on the front and back of all swtes 12 Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area . regwrements 8 L, M,,N, o,Pl t ~ ~ 13 Hazardous Materials Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in venting from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Diwsion The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 1 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subject bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 2 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • • L, Nl, N,©, P,~ I,~v~ RESOLUTION NO 06-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17460, A SUBDIVISION OF 3 36 NET ACRES OF LAND INTO 3 NUMBERED LOTS FOR THE SALE OF 2 OFFICE CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (MIXED USE DISTRICT PROPOSED), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET, BETWEEN CENTER AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-401-35 A Rentals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 request is referred to as "the application " 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred . B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the southwest corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue, with a street frontage of 463 feet on Haven Avenue and is presently improved with an abandoned retention basin, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential, the property to the east is designated Office Space and is vacant, and the property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a That Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and L~ M rN~~~ ~f l In 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC Apnl 12, 2006 Page 2 . b The design or improvements of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife ortheir habitat, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 is not likely to cause serous public health problems, and f The design of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 wdl not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the • California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared, therefore, reflect the independent fudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wdl result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project wtll have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference • ~,r),N~o~ P ,i~u PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 3 Engineenno Department 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Mayor Divided Highway" standards as requred and including (7 1/2-foot median,12 feet, 11 feet, 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane and 11-foot bus bay south of Church Street or 7 1/2-foot median, 13 feet, 11 feet, 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane mid block) a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, and dove approach as required b) Drive approach shall be a minimum of 35 feet wide per City Standard 101 Type C c) Provide a bus bay/deceleration/right turn lane on Haven Avenue to entrance d) Revise traffic signing and striping and protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Haven Avenue as required e) Protect or provide additional Traffic Signal equipment, as required and in accordance with Focused Traffic Study 2) Church Street frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Se condary" standards as regwred, including a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, drive approach as required b) Provide traffic signing and striping and protect R26(s) 'No Stopping" signs along Church Street as required c) Proposed entrance locations shall be per City "Driveway Policy" d) Protect or replace existing Traffic Signal equipment as regwred 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead uttlities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the protect frontage from the center of Church Street and Haven Avenue to the westerly protect boundary 4) All service utility Imes crossing Church Street shall be undergrounded 5) Provide a 25-foot wide public storm drain easement for the proposed storm drain Provide a blanket access easement over the remainder parcel for City maintenance crews to access manholes ~~~/N/~, P~~~s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 4 6) Dedicate vehicle restriction rights to the City except at location approved with the Development Site Plan 7) Best Management Management Plan Engineer Practices proposed in the Water Quality must be reviewed and approved by the City Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobtle construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South CoastAir Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work penods L~ ~,N1,N, C7, P , ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 5 Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 regwrements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs requmng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required .to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolmk schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters ~~MIN,~,P ~ ~~"1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 6 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be requved to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Biological Resources 1) Prior to the commencement of protect grading, the protect applicant shall submit evidence to the City that all permit requirements mandated by the U S Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, have been satisfied Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed . 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site durng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actiwties entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be . included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or L~M,(~l,c~t{~,1tr.F~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 7 • off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site Post -Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water Quality Management Plan to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be • submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permts 7) Pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 S) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of • 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 8 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Offiaal Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Offical within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Operational Noise 5) Minimum sound wall height required for aground-floor backyard/patio is 8 feet forthe following buildings along Church Street Bwidings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21 6) A 5-foot sound wall is recommended for balconies assoaated with the following buildings along Church Street that are directly exposed to Church Street traffic Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 Balconies outside of 500 feet from the Church Street centerline or those that are blocked by the intervening structures (including those on the sides of the bwlding facing away from Church Street) do not need balcony walls 7) Bedrooms in Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 that are within 382 feet of the Church Street centerline and directly exposed to traffic regwre a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system 8) Bedrooms in Buildings 4 through 7 that are within 792 feet of the Haven Avenue centerline and directly exposed to the traffic require a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • • ~,N~,Nlot P~'~° • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-23 SUBTPM17460 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC Apnl 12, 2006 Page 9 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl, 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS ~i ~1 C~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT17382 and DRC2004-01270 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported . 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 L,I'`1,N , o t P, I ~7 Z Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTT17382 and DRC2002-01270 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the protect planner 4 The project planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reportmg Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protectplannerorresponsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached . hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits i ~--, Ni , (~/, O 1 Q~ 11 3 • • i MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17382 and DRC2004-01270 Applicant: Lewis Investment Company, LLC Initial Study Prepared by: L. J. Henderson AICP Date: January 31, 2006 _d ~_ ... -. All construction equpment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 through seeding and watering z 1 of 8 . . .. . . ... .. • -. ~. . . Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Rev f l iew o p ans A/C z/q • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC areas to erosion over extended periods of time 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC Z/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work penods • Dispose of sur lu p s excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Swee street d p s accor ing to a schedule established BO C During q by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction f~' ~ Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C Dunng q wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction 4 SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements ~ Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During q ~ haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction 4 swtable means ~ The site shall be treated with water or other BO C Dunng q 4 ~ soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction-Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 2 of 8 • r O Z O .. All residenl~al and commercial structures shall be BO C/D ... , regwred to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting Review of plans C 2/4 heating, air conddioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial stru t c ures shall be regwred to in BO CID Review of plans C corporate thermal pane windows and 2/4 weather-stripping Cultural Resources ` :;~ ~,``, '°' 'a;~s> ~~='~~;r`:6 ;•;s , .. ._ ~ ~ e ` ~ ` ~ ` ~ n b w "_;^,~~f _~~:~ 'R'r .r<36'~,u. ~ K~ ~~ ~~ ~.c: . „ ~ ~'~.. n: s fu 4 ~ at rgyw ^ t,~:.,'} a"w y ' . .-~, ~ _ • , r aC i' + , ~ ,Ck ~--: , C ,y ` ; -~1x: `` .. t V ~. .'h .. .mfi ~ Ir i If any prehistoric archaeological r ~~ esources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to r t t d CP/BO p o ec un esignated sites from demolit C Review of report A/D 3/4 ion or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value I Consider establishing provisions to require incor t CP/BO C Revew of report A/D 3l4 pora ion of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the ubli b ' CP/BO p c a out the area s archaeological heritage C Review of report AID 3/4 • Propose mitigation measure d CP/BO C s an recommend Review of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on signficant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resour CP C ces management report, Revie f AID 3/ documenting the inventory, evaluation, and w o report 4 proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 3of8 _Z Q -'b .. .. .. ~. ~. .. If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report AID 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mingaUon measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mingadon monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activdies • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO BIC Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing achwties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) Geology and Sods - ~ - .- - .' The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and construction RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions associated wdh vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction ~8 ~ ! ~ f 7 4 . . . .. .. ... . Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,p emissions ,r ~a n ^'4; ~v~Y.,;~°-. H drolo y and Water Qualit '.~ ~.:N U, +,`..':xqr ~ < :t&a~,.~?~'~;ul.3a".,_~ r~` ;"".«_.M .~f4,'i - ~ '%~G: ~;r~`'{-. ; ~~,~7 „~.,!'{~i ~ .{{r. ,' '~r~. - - y g y. ,r,- ;, } <, , . : ~.• ~, . ~, , ~ , „ Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2l4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed ~ protect that idenbhes specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading I This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specrfied hme frame Dunng construction, temporary berms such as BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2l4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5 of 8 ~C C~ V .. . . .. . . . . . .. . ~. ~. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole 8 Associates, Inc dated December 10, 2004, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/CID Review of plans AIC 214 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on- site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent wdh the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 214 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National "Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Z ~ -~ s ~$ s r _~ _~ _d "~ ... ~. ~. Noise . >~.- - ..: ,; ~ ~~ _5, 's ° ., ~x~~ : ` .~•.s- • . -_~ : ~- .r. p -~~, , c- - ;_ -- For ail residences along Center Avenue and Arrow BO C During A 4 Route, provide air-conditioning units to allow windows to construction remain closed, thereby reducing noise Provide afree-standing noise wall for all residences CP C Durng Plan A A along Arrow Route m accordance with the Noise Check and consultant's recommendations construction Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards speafied in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Bulding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Offiaal within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted ' The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 7 of 8 .. ~ .. . -. ~. •c r`. ~~ -ip, a ,t ,+ a ro' Transpiirta46nfTraffic.:~c~ '~~~'"_,_ ~- .-:i~'Fwy.~;h."~~c^'e~m . z.. .•S~ r! .~ ry• `~ ~;r~t~x„`'•~. r~;~ _ _ +/.+~' .:"l..~ti M. 3wN' k H w~. r~ ~ ~°1 3~ . -CND r4'.+ p=ro ~ ~,t"~.- ~'.~~ V.~~4t~ ~"t l ~ ,~ pin .N~R' . .: ri !%.e-, ~'vfle~ 'S ~~_;~.., ~ r~: ~ r ~ The pro)ect shall pay the "fair share" contribution for traffic Impacts estimated in a study to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer The mitigation measures specified in the previous TIA are hereby incorporated by reference Mitigation Measure TC-9 from the GP EIR, permitting certain key Intersections (including Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard) to operate at level of service E or better, is hereby Incorporated Into the pro)ect Key to Checklist Abbreviations 3 Z .~ p ,. ~ ;~;: ~ d ~ `~',~' ~~ <Res onsible Person;, '~ iati'~ .~ r ~•- .~:~~ ~~Monitoring,F.reguenisy~ + •~ ~MetFiod;of Vertfjcatiiin..~'~,.,--~:~ _~- . _ Sanction's, ~~;, _ CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C - Pian Check 3 - W dhhold CertiTicate of Occupancy BO -Building OKcial or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submidai (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fire Chiet or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation i \plannmgVarryVewis protects\vintnersmmchklsl-rev8-8-OSfinal doc ~f $ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM17460 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC LOCATION: HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET - APN 1077-401-35 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense to the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 is granted sub,ect to the approval of DRC2004-01197, DRC2005-00001 and DRC2005-00071 B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Owners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or poor to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer ~ The Owners' Assocation shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the • name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes SC-1-OS 1 Comolehon Date -~-~- ~ ~ ~tr~ ,tv, o,~, ~~ 2 Protect No SUBTPM17460 Comple4on Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: D. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on Church Street 2 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedlcated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Church Street and Haven Avenue 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of budding permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shaii bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 7 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 8 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured~from the face of curbs E. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X X C X X X X (e) Church Street X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Bus Bay Improvement Plans and Construction SC-1-05 • / I I / / I / I / I I / / I I / / /_ -- / / / I ~,Nt1~l Dr P, ~ ~3 Protect No SUBTPM17460 Comole6on Dale a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safely lights _/_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil • Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and _/_I_ interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction _/_/_ protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remarn open to traffic at all times with _I_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_I_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/_ accordance with the City's street tree program SC-1-05 ~/M,/J,~I P~\~~I Protect No SUBTPM17460 Completion Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Mm Grow Space Spacing Size ~ Church Street P A 8' or greater Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 30' O C 15 'Samuel Sommet P A Less than 8' Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 20'O C 15 Gal 'St Mary' Haven Avenue Foreground P A 8' or greater Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 60' O C 15 Gal Generally m front of 'Matestic Beauty Intention sidewalk ally spaced this far apart P A less than 8' Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3' 15 Gal 'St Mary 20' O C Pnmary Vee in Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree 8' 15 Gal masses, mainly behind sidewalk 25' O C informal if mamtam ed by ary Construction Notes for street i tees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be fumtshed to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection Ime of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required F. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of budding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue SC-1-05 / / u • / I / / / I 4 L,M,N~Vi~t~~5 Project No SUBTPM1746o Comolehon Date G. Drainage and Flood Control . 1 The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection faalities suffiaent to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 5 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is requred for work within its right-of-way H. Improvement Completion 1 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City • will be regwred for Church Street and Haven Avenue curb/gutter, street lights, street trees, drive approaches, sidewalk, a c pavement, bus bay, and bike trail I. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them J. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to bulding • permit issuance if no map is involved SC-1-05 5 ~tM r-N,~,P, ~ ~ I_/_ / I / I I / I I I / I / / / I I I / I I Protect No SUBTPM17460 Comolehon Date Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Dversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable rf at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from • landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction andlor demolition protect r L SC-1-OS 6 L,M~N,otP~B~ RESOLUTION NO 06-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00071, A MIXED USE PROJECT COMPRISED OF 2 OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 44,782 SQUARE FEET,126 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND 9SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ON A TOTAL NET SITE AREA OF 14 31 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET, BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 A Recitals 1 Pitassi Architects, Inc filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2005-00071, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,ect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the south side of Church Street, between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue and is presently vacant, undeveloped, and was previously used as a Flood Control Detention Basin, and b The property to the north of the sub,ect site is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential The property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed single-family residential The property to the east is designated Office Space and is vacant The property to the south is designated Industrial Park and is Office and Institutional (CVWD Equipment Maintenance Yard) Industrial Park 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows ~,r~,N, ~,Py~~B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC Apnl 12, 2006 Page 2 a The proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed in the Mitigation Monitonng Program c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plamm~g Deoartment 1) Approval of Development Review DRC2005-00071 is granted subtect to approval and adoption by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 3 Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17460 Engineering Department 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Ma/or Divided Highway" standards as regwred and including (7 1 /2-foot median, 12 feet, 11 feet, 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane and 11-foot bus bay south of Church Street or 7 1/2-foot median, 13 feet, 11 feet, 11 feet thru lanes, 5-foot bike lane mid block) a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees and drive approach, as required b) Drrve approach shall be a minimum of 35 feet wide per City Standard 101 Type C c) Provide a bus bay/deceleration/right turn lane on Haven Avenue to entrance d) Rewse traffic signing and striping and protect R26(s) "No Stopping" signs along Haven Avenue, as required e) Protect or provide additional Traffic Signal equipment, as required and m accordance with Focused Traffic Study 2) Church Street frontage improvements to be m accordance with City "Se condary" standards as requved and including a) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, 9500 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, drive approach, as regwred b) Provide traffic signing and striping and protect R26(s) 'No Stopping" signs along Church Street, as regwred c) Proposed entrance locations shall be per City "Driveway Policy " d) Protect or replace existing traffic signal equipment, as regwred 3) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundmg of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage from the center of Church Street and Haven Avenue to the westerly project boundary 4) All service utility Imes crossing Church Street shall be undergrounded L,M,N,D, P ~ ~~Iv PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 4 5) Provide a 25-foot wide public storm drain easement for the proposed storm drain Provide a blanket access easement over the remainder parcel for City maintenance crews to access manholes 6) Dedicate vehicle restriction rights to the City except at location approved with the Development Site Plan 7) Best Management Management Plan Engineer Environmental Mitigation Practices proposed in the Water Quality must be reviewed and approved by the City Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods L/M,N,p,P,l`~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-0007 1- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 5 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commeraal facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate high effiaency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, . appliances, and water heaters ~l~lN~a P)~~2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 6 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Biological Resources 1) Prior to the commencement of protect grading, the protect applicant shall submit evidence to the City that all permit requirements mandated by the U S Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, have been satisfied Geology and Sotls 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) dailyto reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed • 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing actiwties are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be • included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or L,M,N, O,P,~~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 Page 7 off-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post-Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, • including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for rewew and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise • 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday L,rt,N, o, Pf ~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC Apnl 12, 2006 Page 8 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase , 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 datly trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings • Operational Noise 5) Minimum sound wall height regwred for aground-floor backyard/patio is 8 feet forthe following buildings along Church Street Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 6) A 5-foot sound wall is recommended for balconies associated with the following buildings along Church Street that are directly exposed to Church Street traffic Butldings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 Balconies outside of 500 feet from the Church Street centerline or those that are blocked by the intervening structures (including those on the sides of the bwlding facing away from Church Street) do not need balcony walls 7) Bedrooms in Bwldings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, and 21 that are within 382 feet of the Church Street centerline and directly exposed to traffic require a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system C~ ~- I ~`~,(v,0,~, I q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-24 DRC2005-00071- PITASSI ARCHITECTS, INC April 12, 2006 . Page 9 8) Bedrooms in Buildings 4 through 7 that are within 792 feet of the Haven Avenue centerline and directly exposed to the traffic regwre a mechanical ventilation system, such as an air-conditioning system 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary • I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS C~ L,,r-~ ,N, c~, P, i ~ ~ Protect File No.: DRC2005-00001 SUBTPM17460 PROGRAM • CJ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development Distract Amendment Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Development Review DRC2005-00071, and This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Farm will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~-~ f`'~, N, Dt ~, ~ ~ 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00001, Tract Map Subtt17435, Development Review DRC2005-00071, and SUBTPM17460 Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development. 5. All MMP Reportmg Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reportmg Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planneror responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9 In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of building permds. • ~-. ,1~-1 ~ N , C~ 1 ~, \G ~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-01197 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17435, Design Review DRC2005-00071, and Development Dlstnct Amendment DRC2005-00001 Applicant: Pltassl Architects Initial Study Prepared by: L J. Henderson AICP, Pnnclpal PlannerDate February 14, 2006 r ~~ _~ .. .. ~ -. . Air(luahty~ Y.- - 11 .I,SY: iL1k(?~i a'''~ ~ -i ~'~4~§iyV-Tl~r` --'. '~` `fY_~b .. . ' ~ ~ ' - All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2l4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Rewew of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Dlstnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans AIC 2l4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 1 of 8 _r Z _~ Z r' Q C ~ . - -. .. All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2l4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended perwds of time ~ • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if sill is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds Q e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordancewith construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical sod stabd¢ers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions ~f 8 r 3 _~ G 0 .. ... .. .. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All industrial and commercial faalities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industrial and commercial faalities shall designate CP C Review of plans A/C 2/3 preferential parking for vanpools All industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or CP C Review of plans D 2l3 more employees shall be requred to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high effiaencyllow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping ~rBiolo' iCel esburcesn"uk:~#,'`~y``'~;,, "`';4,:k;.~9~~v,~.y.°. ~ ,~ ~. ~ti ` ~ 9 ~ ~ z n` :.: ,,`4„ ~ ~1 ~ .4 '.L~~ ,.~ty47- ~,Y j F,, ~:a x;c Vi ~+, e '# ^~ r ~~ ~,~~ ,x Y}f~~~ Frt~ 'k<,+i.~'; ' ~ : ~~ ~ l ~ i . '~'^~ ;; ~"sir, ,; ~ r ~ G: r~' ~ ~,, Yy~; ~.~ xH / F ~4 ?~ ~ ~ , i; ~,;,;,-.,4 _ ~ i nJ s . 1,1 ": /~ ? A.- XF:rv Y.^'1 nb ,~ 1,'P ~~ ~ v1j~ Y j',CrF\ IJC),~". +- Y i yR.~Y • b}^V1 t a. B ~-Y ~l 1 .. ~'~. _ y y a4 S(a + ? ~ f 'N l i. ~ • Prior to the commencement of protect grading, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 protect applicant shall submit evidence to the City that all permit regwrements mandated by the U S Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, have been satisfied N 3of8 3 Z G N c, r .. ~. , • • .. ~ ~ ~'~ 4+~ ~:F~'/~~~~f ,+J4a-E% M : % ' S d • G l d ~= -^~ i -:~T ~ -~• 'f=' ~ Lm~~C(~^' 1".<,^~ ~` ~ ^ f' ~T'~~, ~ 1 ~;"~:?~'z . ~') ATA~ ~ `~+` ~- ' ~ ,.~ 'iN^{3.t•! ~ ~ ~$~ti-ti'tr -v ~ ~ _. f • , ~ o s eo ogyan ~ ~ : ,~~, -3, ,~~,.; > ` . a31:'h ; ~; ., , . , . The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and constructon RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construchon Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Durng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site durng such episodes ~ Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all mactrve construchon construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions {6 ~.•"' 'M `"1d~~ ^: .5' .. ~` I v'WI'h w"'t"-..: Y V•~. ',*,'~. ~T4• b`f"N.~•.~x,a ~i~ R nd WaterzQuali{~lr~. K ~ y~C ~Xdrolo i ` Y„ ~ ~ ~k~'Ac~ti il~i('~t „y ~ t ,. ?. ~ , ~~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ f`i~•.:t~....~r .,;•,~~~ g ~~ °t' X!.W.N,t^~ • 1~u~T.~k{~4,}yyxA~ ~~e~ ~t,,~ ~,` , ` 0 f i ''m' tsf #,t~"~r';. ';` •. ~. ~t'~~" f`*£°'5} P, ~.~` ~~~ ~l }~ ~t .' ",p,*i'Y."+~f K-'Y, ,~: ,•' , t.?r ~R g )" ~ri~~J '~Y K~-4. .s L e l r. i , at+' F w• n u ~ .t <? i Q, : ~ W , ¢p b~ , ~ ~,. ~ .. •~ , . , _ t Prior to issuance of grading permds, the permit applicant BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2~4 shall submd to Bwlding Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speaficaily identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. ~f$ _Z O CJ U' • i • ~ . ,. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO 8/CID Review of plans AIC 2l4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- siteand off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as 80 BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 cleaning wdl be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Insert other specific BMPs from WOMP CE BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Qualdy Management Plan prepared by (name/date) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 5of8 .r T Z _Q _~ N CJ r .. ... -. . . Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2l4 controlling and minimi2ing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Pnor to issuance of budding permds, the applicant shall CE B/CID Revew of plans AIC 214 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2l4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwlding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit `~,J. i'Y.; ' t~ ~~*. ;.4..',i °.~~~ " 4". 4.. :^ 'N i e "- ~;_' ` ~ ' >' }: r: ,~r •..y , ~ `' ~~k~a t-ii a,~ .~ w. ~~•-~ ^-' ';` ~. ~ , . r -'°"Ye* `e -> ,= .' -'v'ht^~~ ~/";V:.~ o s _ .~.;, . • x-::: ,~ _,': ~. . ~~, _ , , . ! y x __ Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday • ~$ r _~' =0 N rJ N -. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other Gmes may be required by the Building Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding Offical wdhm 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as passible in the fvst phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of t3 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Minimum sound wall height required for aground-floor CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 backyardlpatio is 8 feet for the following buldings along Church Street Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21 A 5-foot sound wall is recommended for balconies CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 assoaated with the following buildings along Church Avenue that are directly exposed to Church Avenue traffic Bwidings 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21 Balconies outside of 500 feet from the Church Avenue centerline or those that are blocked by the intervening structures (including those on the sides of the bwlding facing away from Church Street) do not need balcony walls 7 of 8 Key to Checklist Abbrevlattons ~' , . .51: Responsible~Person ~~~ ~~ =~r ".~> >` t_~_ -~ -+;, 5 +lnr~.. ;;Monitoring"Frequency; r~+i.'~r .r { - 4 e _ _.~ 1. '~ _ , ~ "' r- ?Metliod+of Verification;x~^ "~_ \ u"~+-~" r Sanctionsr_ - CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map - CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit f O CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction ccupancy C -Plan Check 3 - Wdhhold Cert+ficate o G BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (ReporlslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds ,Q 6 -Revoke CUP rJ FC - Fue Chief or designee 7 -Citation O i \planning\larn7\haven and church\final subtt17435 mmchklst-rev8-8-0Sfinal doc ~f $ • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2005-00071 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC LOCATION: HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET - APN 1077-401-35 AND 36 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-24, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations • SC-1-OS ComoleBOn Date -/-/- / / / / / / LiM rN, O,S?,~o-7 Project No DRC2005-00071 Comolenon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bulding and Safety The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to l iance Department to show comp occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bwldmg elevations incorporating all ConditOns of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _/_/_ bwldmg, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all licable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the and a O d _/_/_ pp inances, r other applicable City time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan; including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved rtment (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits D l P _/_/_ epa ice o by the City Planner and Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, IocaGOn, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view g Trash receptacle(s) are required for office development and shall meet City standards The final _/_/_ design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits . 10 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete ner For single- Pl t C an y i or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the nsformers shall be placed in underground vaults t t ra s, family residential developmen 11 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _I_I_ including proper illumination 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape homeowners' assoaation r _/_/_ , , owne maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of building permits 13 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _/_/_ requirements, special street posting, phone IisGng for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 14 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining roperty owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' p s owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project perimeter 15 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along intenor side and rear property lines), ratherthan _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency • SC-1-OS ~-,M,N~~I (',Zo~3 Protect No DRC2005-00071 Comolehon Date 16 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_I_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC • 17 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decoratwe masonry _/_/_ 18 For multtple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as regwred by the _/_I_ Development Code 19 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space _/_/_ shall be provided 20 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as regwred by the _/_/_ Development Code 21 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Ail parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a bwlding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk ad/scent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across arculation aisles shall be provided _/_/_ throughout the development to connect dwellings/unitslbwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreattonal uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _I_I_ • and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers tf driveways are less than 18 feet to depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk 6 The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehtcies on _/_/_ this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than m designated visitor parking areas 7 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, Cary Engineer, and Rancho _/_/_ Cucamonga Fue Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking Into the public right-of-way 8 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 9 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _I_I_ parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet E. Bui lding Design 1 Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Assoaation shall be submitted for Ctty _/_/_ Planner and Bwlding Official review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits • SC-1-OS +-'/r`~+,N1 of Pt~~ Protect No DRC2005-00071 Comoletion Date All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment andlor protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bulding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans F Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces requred are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the office bwldings shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office bwldings and other non-residential development G. 4 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided on Haven Avenue Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adtoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the protect 0%-48-inch box or larger 10%- 36-inch box or larger, 10%-24-inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 3 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial protects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office protects, shall be speamen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 6 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy u / / / / / / ~ i / / / / / / / / SC-1-OS 4 L,N1,N,O, P, ~-i ~ Protect No DRC2005-00071 Comolehon Date 7 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger s¢e shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 8 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 9 For mulct-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 10 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 11 Speaal landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Haven Avenue 12 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 13 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 14 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Crty Planner rewew and approval prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 15 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code H. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs A Uniform Sign Program for the office development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall requue separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to issuance of bwlding permits SC-1-05 / / / / / / I / -~-~- I / / / / I / / L~M,N~OI Pt 211 Protect No DRC2005-00071 Completion Date 1. Environmental 1 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained In the final report 3 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Bulding & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 4 Mitigation measures are required for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $495 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit J. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEWtS) K. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2005-00071) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential pro,ect or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance SC-1-05 _/_/~ I I / / / / / / / / / / ~,~~,N,o, Pl ~(Z Probed No DRC2005-00071 Completion Date 3 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the BuOding and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 4 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwlding and Safety Offiaal after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 6 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on Church Street 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Church Street and Haven Avenue 4 Recprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC8R5 or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded poor to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 7 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 8 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs M. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is requred unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that m developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as regwred by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of ail improvements regwred by these conditions of approval of development SC-1-05 7 ~,M,y~p,P,2f3 / I / I / / / I / / / / / I / I / I / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2005-00071 Comoletion Date Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Orive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Btke Trail Other Haven Avenue X X C X X X X (e) Church Street X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of constructlon fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Bus Bay Improvement Plans and constructlon a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street Ilghts, and Intersection safety Ilghts on future slgnal poles, and traffic slgnal plans shall be prepared by a registered Clvtl Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clry Englneer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the CIty Englneer and the CIty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, pnor to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineer's Office In addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new constructlon or reconstruction protect along mayor or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the CIty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless othenvlse specified by the CIty Englneer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per CIty Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during constructlon Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provlded to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satlsfactlon of the CIty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per CIty Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program ~ / / I / / / I / / / / / / / / / / SC-1-05 %,M,IV) ~,P,2tiy Protect No DRC2005-00071 Comolehon Date 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to ad/ust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size Cry Church Street P A 8' or greater Magnolia grentligora NCN B' 30' O C 15 'Samuel Sommer P A Less than 8' Magnolia granditlora NCN 3' 20'O C 15 Gal 'St Mary' Haven Avenue Foreground P A 8' or greater Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8' 60' O C 15 Gal Generaly in front of 'Maiestic Beauty' Intentionally sidewalk spaced this far apart P A less than 8' Magnolia grandigora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 Gal 'St Mary' Primary tree in Brachychiton popuineus Bottle Tree 8' 25' O C 15 Gal masses, mainy informal if behind sidewalk maintained by City . Constructton Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic Bolls report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill Boll amendments, as determined by the Clty Inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only 6 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, Imes of sight shall be plotted for all protect Intersections, Including driveways Local residential street Intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required N. Public Maintenance Areas \ 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue O. Drainage and Flood Control 1 The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Clvll Engineer and approved by the Clty • Engineer SC-1-OS / / / / / / / / / / ~,~,N,o,Pz-5 Protect No DRC2005-00071 Comolehon Date 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed _/_/_ from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all • necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adtacent areas 5 A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is regwred for work within its _/_I_ right-of-way P. Uti lities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agenaes involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be sub/ect to any requirements that may be received from them Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is involved 2 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition pro/ect • SC-1-05 10 ~-,MrNiotP,2~~ Protect No DRC2005-00071 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All bwldings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures S. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking dewce, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices 4 All roof openings giving access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed T. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner 2 Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic 3 Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede entry to burglars 4 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire U. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department All developments shall submit an 8 Y:" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department V. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and Yves SC-1-OS 11 / / / I / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / / / / / / I / / ~, N1, N, d, (?~--~1 Protect No DRC2005-00071 Completion Date 2 Alarrn companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 _~_~_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • SC-1-05 12 ~;,,,;~ , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection _ District ---- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 8, 2005 Church & Haven MFR Subdivision Multi-Family Tentative Tract & Design Review SUBTT17435 & DRC2005-00071 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants incommercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants inmulti-family residential protects is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet No portion of the exterior wall facng the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet d For single-family residential protects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet e Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercal, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections iu On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible • iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District ~,M~n,,~ o,p~Z~q iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A mirnmum of forty-feet (40 feet) from any building If any portion of a factlity or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the extenor of the faality or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fve flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed is 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire spnnkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R with central station morntonng This regwrement is made in accordance with the Californa Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire Distract Ordinances 2 The regwred minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous fire area shall be not less than 1,750 gpm at 20-psi residual For structures in excess of 36,000 square feet use CFC Table A-III-A-1 3 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subtect to Fire Distract review and approval Pnvate fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 4 Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 5 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Pnor to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, speafications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained pnor to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards regwre an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed in 1 Multifamtly structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Multi-family residential structures in excess of 4 units • 3 All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (see Fire Access) 2 L, M , N, ~, ~, zZo 4 When regwred fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure • 5 When the bwlding access does not meet the regwrements of the 2001 California Bwlding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #F191 10 20 6 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be spnnklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) regwres an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the Californa Budding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard #F191 10 200 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are ~ a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) • 3 ~, M ,rv, o, p2,z_ ~ Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design regwrements apply a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afad-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mecharncal malfunction h Motorized gates shall be egwpped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review • • 4 L,M, w, ~, P, zzz FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the iudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Compressed Gases Public Assembly Cryogenics LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Bwldings Flammable and Combustible Ligwds Welding and Cutting Operations Hazardous Materials Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure regwrements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased proDerty which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subiect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shalt be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of egwpment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation 1 Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access L,M,N, v/ PZ~ 3 a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or • d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the submittal The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subtect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radn and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a w regwred private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property Ime, or c Provide service to adtacent properties, or Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assocation, or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the prvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits ~-,M , N,c~,P, z z ~i Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard • Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Prvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the protect All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivenng any combustible framing matenals to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the firnshed surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The budding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of • Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On pnvate property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location ~,(~,N,OP, zz5 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer • and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler morntoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 10 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 11 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercal/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial bwldings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 12 Fuel Modification Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area • regwrements [-,M,N, qP, z-~-.~ T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE April 12, 2006 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner BY Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00339 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An application to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope within a mixed use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Paafic Road Right-of-Way -APN 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related • Files Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Councl will be separately noticed ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2004-00352 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An application to amend the Development Code to allow the development of the land that contains a 30 percent slope within amixed-use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way -APN. 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This action will be forwarded to the City Councl for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES- A residential subdivision of 8 lots for condominwm purposes on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distracts, located on the north side of ITEM Q, R, S, T, U, V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/SUBTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 Apnl 12, 2006 Page 2 Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Paafic Rail Road Right-of-Way -APN 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related Files Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominiums on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Corridor area within Sub area 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way - APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Rewew DRC2004-00826 VARIANCE DRC2005-01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant on property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard at the intersection of San Bernardino Road -APN. 0207-101-24. Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00637, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -Parking lot, loading area modifications and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant, located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard - APN 0207-101-24 Related Files. Development Review DRC2003-00637, Varance DRC2005-01061, and Tentative Tract SUBTT16605. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Protect Density 9 8 Dwelling Units per acre B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Condominwms and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South - Across Foothill Boulevard is developed with office and commercial uses designated Mixed Used East - Abandoned Southern Pacific Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Mixed Use West - Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adjacent to the Medum Density residential development Q, R, S, T, U, V C~ r1 LJ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/SU BTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 . Page 3 C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Mixed Use North - Medum Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Mixed Use East - Open Space West - Mixed Use, Medium Density Residential, and Open Space D Site Characteristics Slopes are a motor feature of the site with over 34 percent of the site having slopes of 30 percent or greater. A matority of the site is disturbed, and replanted with non-native species, however, there are numerous mature trees Site features include a large, concrete drainage facility (abandoned reservoir) that has the remains of spray cans, graffiti, and dumping and the pad area for a demolished water tank. Evidence of squatters' campsites, and trash dumping is present in canyon areas Significant visual features that frame the site are the historic Sycamore Inn on the west, the Red Hill Bluff to the north, and the abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad embankment to the east Mature heritage trees are existing on- and off-site and are discussed m a revised Arborist Study dated February 2005, by David Evans and Associates E Parking Calculations Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided 2 bedroom condo 1,104 to 1,256 1 8/unit 206 covered 214 covered 165 open 157 open 52 guests 52 guests 82 covered tandems Existing Restaurant 11,000 1/100 sq ft 110 167 TOTAL 533 672 Pre-Application Review Staff referred the protect to the Planning Commission on August 13, 2003, because of the scope of the protect, historic sensitivity of the Sycamore Inn restaurant, and potential public controversy (Exhibit K) ANALYSIS A General• The protect site land use designation is Mixed Use The proposed protect is the request to construct 206 condominiums on 21 acres The developer is proposing to construct the development on land with up to 30 percent slopes, which regwres a Development Code and a General Plan Amendment The development is anticpated to generate a ratio of 2 6 persons per unit or approximately 585 additional residents • However, growth was anticipated and is designed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter 17 32, Foothill Boulevard Districts gwdelmes for development of Subarea 1 Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/SUBTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 4 The protect site has not been identified as an "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Murncipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) An Historical Assessment of the protect site was conducted by Stephen R Van Wormer in May 1990, and revealed the following four historic resources were identified as a result of research and field survey and include 1) the Cucamonga Stage station site, 2) the Sycamore Inn, 3) the Red Chief Motel (now demolished), and 4) the San Bernardino Museum. Archaeological Information has noted the presence of two previously recorded historic bridges (CHS-1786-1 and CHS-1786-6) as well as the old Los Angeles to San Bernardino Road route (PS-BR-3-H) adtacent to the protect boundaries These resources are outside the protect area and will not be impacted It is noted that the Sycamore Inn site is affected from asite-specific impact, since the main access to the residential protect is through the parking lot. Careful attention to the current restaurant needs of the Inn was considered with the residential design so that the economic viability of this unique historical resource is not adversely affected The most significant change was a shifting of the main driveway entrance on Foothill Boulevard further west in order to better align the intersection with San Bernardino Road and eliminate most of the pedestrian vehicular traffic conflict with a matority of the Sycamore Inn parking spaces Linocut Law & Greenspan Engineers conducted a Traffic Impact Study in July 2003. The study focused on seven intersections to determine the potential traffic impacts during the morning and evening commute peak hours (between 7 00 a m and 9:00 a.m and 4 00 p m and 6 00 p m. on a typical weekday) The study concluded that the protect would generate on a typical weekday approximately 1,283 daily two-way taps, with 96 taps (15 inbound, 81 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 118 trips (79 inbound, 39 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour The results of the traffic analysis indicated that the proposed protect will not adversely impact any of the seven key study intersections when compared to City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Upland, and San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Level of Service standards and significance traffic impact criteria The seven key study intersections currently operate, and are protected to operate with the inclusion of protect traffic, at an acceptable service level during AM and PM peak commuter hours B General Plan and Development Code Amendment The Mixed Use Designation in the General Plan is neither a residential nor commeraal category of the General Plan Land Use Map In recognition of its unique classification, it is a separate category. This is obwous since the density is not assigned per parcel but on an area wide basis subtect to design and land use review Therefore, the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code, such as prohibiting development where slope is greater than 30 percent, were never intended to apply as uniformly as with a residentially designated parcel from a slope density calculation stand point The intent of the Hillside density restrictions was to address natural slopes, in this case we have a 20 acre fractured site surrounded by developed land In fact, the case can be made the site has been so altered (Foothill Boulevard , R R. Line, a water reservoir, and a water tank) with graded access roads that the site is not natural as to not even being within the intent of the Hillside density regwrement of the Development Code Also, the natural drainage courses have been subtect to urban runoff for years from the developed Red Hill neighborhood to the north and therefore do not qualify as intended by the General Plan or the zoning • regwrements To clarify the intent of the Hillside Requirements, text amendments to the General Plan and Development Code are contained in the attached Resolutions. Q, R, S, T, U, V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/SU BTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 • Page 5 C Tract Map and Development Review Based on Design Review Committee input, the protect was re-designed to reduce the height of the buildings adjacent to Foothill Boulevard by changing from three-story to two-story, and re-oriented those structures 90 degrees The design changes have resulted in a lower visual profile when viewed from Foothill Boulevard This profile, combined with approximately 900 trees being planted throughout the protect will substantially soften the visual impact along the Foothill Boulevard corridor In addition, the remaining structures and pads were lowered several feet into the site topography to further reduce visual profile from the properties to the north Photo exhibits have been provided that demonstrate the results of these design features The protect uses a craftsman architecture theme with gable style roofs, and cornices, consistent with the historic nature (Sycamore Inn) of the area The retaining walls for the shared access and Sycamore Inn parking areas utilize river rock, which are materials that will carry this theme and visual connection with the historic Sycamore Inn The shared entryway for the Sycamore Inn and condominium protect branches off in a smooth natural transition of the area to the grand entry for the clubhouse The secondary point of access to the west of the protect will be for emergency vehicles only, but provides for a nice connection to the on-site pocket park The site has many amenities including pool and overhead shade trellis with seating located in the recreation area, recreation center with teaching kitchen, billiard and exercise area, recreational trails with benches, spa, and bwit-in gas barbecues throughout the site A shade structure gazebo is also located on the west end of the site There is a tot lot • park near the center of the proposed condominiums The site contains trails and pedestrian connections throughout and the bwldings are literally tucked into the hillside providing for a blending of the existing contours of the site D Variance and Minor Development Review Parking lot, loading area modifications, and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant, and the Variance request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to the existing parking lot, are necessary to develop a shared access connection for the condominiums and the restaurant Although the revised parking layout setback is less than the Code allows, there will be far more landscape setback area provided than currently exists on the site In addition, the improvements will result in a complete upgrade of the landscaping and hardscape surfaces for the historic restaurant while protecting the historical resources (building and mature sycamore trees). E Tree Removal Permit The site contains 71 heritage trees, including Oak, Sycamore, Pepper, Elm, and a few Eucalyptus, according to the arborist report Although the applicant proposes to remove many of the trees, hundreds of new trees will be planted as mitigation Out of 71 heritage trees, 44 of them are located in the northwest corner of the site, and the Site Plan has been revised to minimize disturbance in this area F Design Review Committee The Committee reviewed the protect on August 17, 2004, and requested extensive design changes The Committee reviewed revised plans on January 31, 2006, and unanimously recommended approval of the design plans • G Technical Review Committee The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended approval of the design plans on January 31, 2006 Recommended conditions are contained in the appropriate attached resolutions Q, R, S, T,U,VS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-0035?JSUBTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 6 • H Environmental Assessment Although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and is recommended for certification FACTS FOR FINDING General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment The application applies to approximately 21 acres of land, basically an irregular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Paafic Road Right-of-Way, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Mixed Use, and Properties to the north are developed with condominiums and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commercal uses East of the site is the abandoned Southern Pacific Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the project site adtacent to the Medum Density residential development • Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code were never intended to apply as uniformly as with a residential designated parcel from a slope density calculation stand point The intent of the Hillside density restrictions was to address natural slopes, in this case we have a 20 acre fractured site surrounded by developed land In fact, the site has been so altered (Foothill Boulevard, R R Line, a water reservoir, and a water tank) with graded access roads that the site is not natural as to not even being within the intent of the Hillside density regwrement of the Development Code Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and This amendment promotes the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for the implementation of the Mixed Use designation in this area, and In as much as an Office Commercal use allowed under the Mixed Use Designation would not be subject to the Hillside Density provisions of the General Plan and Development Code, but would allow anon-residential protect of the same or more intense building mass, this amendment would not be materially incurious or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties Q, R, S, T, U, V to PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/SU BTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 7 • Tentative Tract Map The tentative tract map is designed in conformance with the Mixed Use Designation, and Hillside Development Regulations, as recommended for amendment, therefore, the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The tentative tract map design and conditions of approval for improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The tentative tract map and special studies included within the Initial Study demonstrate that the site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and The tentative tract map and special studies included within the Initial Study support that the design of the subdivision and demonstrate it is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serous public health problems as demonstrated by the information contained within the Initial Study; and The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acgwred by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision Development Review Subfect to the amendment of the Hillside Provisions of the General Plan, the Mixed Use designated protect has demonstrated through the plans, Initial Study, and Conditions of Approval that the proposed protect is consistent with the obfectives of the General Plan, and Subfect to the amendment of the Hillside Provisions of the Development Code Mixed Use designated Project has demonstrated through the plans, Initial Study, and conditions of Approval that the proposed design is m accord with the obfectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Mixed Use designation and Hillside Regulations as recommended for amendment m the Development Code, and The Mixed Use designed protect has demonstrated through the plans, Initial Study, and conditions of approval that the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially infurious to properties or improvements in the vianity Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/SUBTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC200S01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 8 Variance Although the revised parking layout setback is less than the Code allows, there will be far more landscape setback area provided than currently exists on the site In addition, the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard, therefore, the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the obfectives of the Development Code There are exceptional or extraordinary arcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties m the same distract since the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprave the applicant of privileges enfoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district since the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district since the deficent setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially infunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity since there will be far more landscape setback area provided than currently exists on the site. In addition the improvements will result in a complete upgrade of the landscaping and hardscape surfaces for the Historic Restaurant while protecting the historical resources (Building and mature sycamore trees) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING A neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicant on January 18, 2006 (Exhibit O), and previously on February 24, 2005 (no minutes available), and on August 10, 2004 (no minutes available) CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the protect site Staff has received 12 letters from neighbors opposed to the protect (Exhibit N), dating from January 30, 2004, through April 4, 2006 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for General Pian Amendment DRC2004-00339 and Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, and approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 by the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions • • Q, R, S, T, U, V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352JSU BTT16605/DRC2003-00637/DRC2005-01061 /DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 9 DC LJH\ma ~J Attachments Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Conceptual Landscape Plans Exhibit C -Fire Access Plan Exhibit D -Parking Lot Demolition (Minor Development Review) Exhibit E -Precise Grading Plan (Minor Development Review) Exhibit F -Parking Lot Entrance Plan (Minor Development Review) Exhibit G -Tentative Tract Map 16605 Exhibit H -Cross Sections (SUBTT16605 and DRC2004-00826 Exhibit I -Conceptual Grading/Drainage (SUBTT16605 ii< DRC2004-00826) Exhibit J - Bwlding Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit K -Pre-Application Review Comments dated August 13, 2003 Exhibit L -Design Review Comments dated August 17, 2004 Exhibit M -Design Review Comments dated January 31, 2005 Exhibit N -Residents Letters dated January 30, 2004, through Apnl 4, 2006 • Exhibit O -Neighborhood Meeting Information and Meeting Minutes Exhibit P -Applicant's Response to Letters dated April 5, 2006 Exhibit O -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 Draft Resolution Approving General Pian Amendment DRC2004-00339 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 Draft Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 Draft Resolution Approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605 Draft Resolution Approving Development Review DRC2003-00637 Draft Resolution Approving Vanance DRC2005-01061 Draft Resolution Approving Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 Q, R, S, T, U, V \ • Acting City Planner /1 --F i ~C H i g i t A Q, R, S, T. ~, V l~ ~' ~~~ `~~e ~R ~: ~~{ ~~-:~ ~ , U§r. g ~ ~x~a ~~~° ~ iii: ~---~ ~moumoono mstmens \ € ~ ~ ! ~ ~! E a ~ ~ ~ $$ pp ! I' y8 r~ . z y \3a P C $o- ~F E S3 i Sp~~~E i~'I !~ ~ & :d o i ~` P~6 !a X43 €r ~ @ ~~31!€E i:P ; s, mm~ ~~ ~~C~~@.'~ ~I1, PI~P#~F93P}~ ~ ;q~~F9's~3l~c'sP~~~~~: - ~ ~ « za p y yy 7 F Agg 3 gqE€i~- t € €3 ~epea ~ 9k ~~ ~? mV ~e': p ~i 52e~2 ~.lePl~T~~a~1~~€~SA 1~~ee~F6YPPi~li F~6o-1 4 ~ oO F~~= ~ u\oomoeo}~aogommmammommmommmmmmmm mm mmmmmmm mmmmm m3{i 4 \ ® Oe~ -~ ~~ , ~ .H a ~~ ~~~ w w i w ! ! ~ w i s i ~ O ,~ 6 ! e ' ~ a a ~ ~ `@ tt ! e i i iP F ~ ~ Q v I j l€ i ,1' € i l ty ( e 1 \\ € I ~~ d€ `~ ggg~, ~f~ g~ °g~~ "•} ~~ s ai ~' g4~ i i I9j{>~1}~ ~ O~®®O®O®O ®®O 1~ ~~ ,~ `~~ w \ - ~. -~ `~~, ~~lilil.oi~isi ~~~ \ a E ~n a' •;~ L~i ~~~~ ~F~ _ _ _ „ P~~el`s~sil~ii - ~ N~a~ ~ ~ m~. ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ o ~~¢~~ € ~ II ~ ~U 7 ~ • ~ ~~ W ~ U ~o 1 J33NF 335 3NIlHJ1YW ~" • U C!~ ~x N ~ ~~ T B -1 Q, R, S, T, U, V 4 • ~ • i z _, N cn -~ c N G~ SYCAMORE VILLAS DAVIDEVAN9 1 1 O O ..o A990CIATESi.c wv ~ Nn~.Sr.v Sur Ul ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r ~ ~.:~: ,;'„" ' a90133HS 33S -oZQ 3Nf1FI~1VM1 ~ • - ~ i u ~~ ~ tix` i 'tr ` .' i7 _~ I ~ ~t I ' ?' ~w~ I ' h^, ~ ~ 1~ ~ r -'~ i; _ J __ - i ~ ~ J ~£ / ~f±- 4 I t ~ _ __ , , ;,~ {' ` ` Y 1 Y.. v 5 i i=i. I _ V } l_, _A _- "~ ~ ;: _ , - __ _ ., . _ ~__ - , ,f ~~ ~~ , ~; ( ~ 1 _ , }~ Q$> ~/~- ~~ Q ~ ' ~.. ~1 ~ W Q Q, R, S, T, U, V 13 ~Z~ ~~ ~3 + ~F~ °_~~e ~~~ a jja ~~j ypir •Y 9:a ~'~8 e gee ~~6 ~P6 ~3i~5 °a o u rc ~ U a V ~ G n oa • I~ ~~ m A ~ ~ n A N ~ N ~ a 0 i 6~ . nE~e ~~~ ``$ @~. as •-: j'i F_. as s~~~ P ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ i~ :. 4~ i~~ Il1.,_ ~, ~~*** ~1 ~`\ ,~ aZG~ 8 p~ ~ p\` ~I '~ - 0 ~ ~\ ;\ , ~~r~ r,~nnlsar~ ~_~ J~8~~~3 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C61 i _ i 1 ~~~ ~~ i t ~ - - ~ ~~ ~~ , ,;, - ; N' _ '_ _- -_ - ~i I - _ --- ~ - I ~- ' _ - 3 . - Ff ~f; . _ , ~ Fy S - ``~ \ _ \ ,~ 1 \~~ ~. ~ ` ~~, ` `~ _ `~ \ \ 1 \ .. ~~ • ~ ~ d~~ ~ a~~ • l ~ T ~ A~ I ,I J .',Vi ExF1-t~i'r C-3 ~- ~ZQ I ~ I~ ,-~ {I' ~ I I k~P .~ k ° 2~ ~° ~~ ~~ e ~~ B ~~go~in5~9 V Z U U - ~ 3 z ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ Y W Z J U3j ~ 6 IZ Z O ,2y R ~ J U U ~ _ O O N K CC11 /~i a U ~ W 6 ~ J ~ E ,i 1 i1 Li u ~55Y ~ga ~f®Y~~ ~[~ Q, R, S, T, U, V ~S • CJ • ~ '/'fide' '"4G:~ ', ;~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~I ~ eGd i . -/ I a r / ~~ ' Ill i i 1 /l4{ ~ ~i / ~ I i~l it ~ I 1I 1 1 ~ ~e I i--. I ~ _ AT° L f r ", ~; .: 'I ~ '• ~ ,r ~. ..,,•. %Jl\- .>~ /~ ' \ -~;r-, r +: .~F ': c ~~%.. _ _. .~ <.; ',; G~/ : r ~ i , ` -. "ALL' /i,.r..._ I ' o ~ :fib ) ~' ; v tl~ ,~ 1~ ~z:- A (^J~ \ ~l4 }per t\ t 1 .; ~•- c~,=~", ~ ,-; ;~ ~ ~'^,''s 'r'r : ~ , : i . xis. -+, i~- i_ ..m'. .L),c-'ran -. ~} I ~I~ I I I ~~ L l f I! ~y f~~ I~T •. _i-'~, ' _ .o-.8 ~~ ,' t~ ~, ~ :+ ~ ~ ~ .~-- ~ ~ ~ ~ lgl 1' ~ - ~ ` , ~~ ~. i ~/ ~~~~ ~~ Jam} ~ 11~~~ ' ~ ~~ 7 . ~~` ~ ~ ~/ ~ _ R, S, T, U, V ~ Lp 0 r, 4 m y''', /i I/ , ~ ' i / I , ~ ' 1 r i ` „ ~ ; ~~ , ~ .' /` i -~ ~ i 1 ~ // II , E ~ ` ~~"_~~~, ~ '~,, ti ,,, ~ _ i .1 ~ ;', g gS . ~oa~ ii 0 i o i~e SPz~ (~Fi317 ~ ~ ~ ® e yy~a7 1 @~i 3 @ C ~ !~ - ~+~-~ @f~@;e~S ~P~r 3_@I i.0' 8i@ ~~ - ~, ,~}, ~.g y /~ /~ ~~ ,~y~ , ii h111~ '4 ~]6 e IwL _ ~~~ ' ~ - E w I~ ~-I{ ~~i i~ i A , f y a % i1 ~i/ 1 '~ i ~~,~~ y ~~ --F- , ~, i .? C ~ ~i ~ _ ~ ' ! ~ ~ . . ,I~, ~' ^1 ~.Q~a /; ~n ~ g e~ , ~ ~ ~ ~\ a~~~ \I` i _ o- _ y.ti v ~.tRl Q, R, S, T, U, V i -~_~,~ ~~ ~ e -/ '~ ff ?. I ~ ® y i / g P ,Nin ye ~ 3 is e.u~ , ~ Q ~- ~ .~a ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ T~ /` ,e~ :Y k C ~, ~i{ - ~ , = ~~ ~;, F~, ~ 1 P@~ 9~/~ ~~~ ~. ~ ~ ~3 A - ~ 1 l i ,. x1 TC, • ~ ~~` + I x, j ~' 1 ~@ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 6 a e9 i ~1, O ~9pp4 `' .,_ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~I~~Z ~ ~ @ i w ~ , -I ~ ~ m ~ i ~ z eL - ~; Q ~~ ,_1 ~ ~ ,i • I• • ~~ il,, ~ ~~ ~1 ~t ~ V~ '. • u €° ~ i a; ~ a ~ ~ ~ZQ v F. 3 F = / ~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,_ ~: f,: j; i i a r = ~ to ~ i ~- i ; ~~ ~~ , 0 ---- ~ l $ ~ ~ ~/ ~ ~~ I ~oa rows ~ ~ /~ 0 ~ l a~ ° / ~, is ~ ' ~ ." i ~ 1 , ~ ~/ 1~°p i ' i _ ` ice/ l~~ % " 1~///~ ~ a / ~ ~ ~ i // izl~ w ~ a / 4 ~ .< K ! i c a. " \e \ 1 ~w\~ ~ ~€~ yy '~ e - ® I SIC '!' i 1 eI ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 0I I41ee ~ \ a ~ a. ~ • \\ ~ - . ~/, \ \ / 543\ a \~ 11 ~~F: _ A { 1 ~$°~ ~ \ ~~ s ---- ~ z kl . ~ 1 ~~ I _ (~~ fi, ~ ~. - -ate .1 0 ' FC ., .. Q - ,~. ~a z :I °' ~ ~ / ~ w ~I ml / / ~ ~ z /- / ~ ~ ~ a. U° 4' R' S' T' ~' ~ ~ U' Z'b-~ 1~~HS ~~S r ? 3 i i BN17 Ho1VW -'ZQ ~ e u nn I ~7~- ~1 V I,. S ; ~\Y \ \ t~1 .~ T;\6 \ I+ S O - ~ ~,e. \ ,~ s ~ ~ O r ~~~a€ s8 ~' ~ \~ ` ~~ III '~'~~ ~ d ~ I a~ ~ f ~i~t ~ ~ oa o O' 4 ~ r I °a ~ ~ I = = - -_ ._ loo ~ ~~^R ~ a y -_ = Im ~ a ~ ~ ' ~~ of ¢ 4 I ' ~ __ . ¢ 1 US~g 5`I•SYFd` F' [~ o a ~_ ~ I I t~jld. ~,3~i l 0 Q a I ~ f;1;Ej3 ~: ~R i ~ ~ nn17 ;ji i u ~G ~I ~ I j~'LSj3ij'~~: i i t a ~ s. °' <N _ I ~~ t ,~ i/ i 8~i3ei~~:3ljf ~ajiEf O ° ~ / r r ~L~, t ` 1 e Lr' i - r ," I~j ~/i~ i ~e ~~Sag~P~ 2 Q~ e 1 -_~ I I IS / 1 iC yC i~ 4 gad - -y '1~~ -- -- t, i ~ ' ° I~1 .r T~ 0 ®o G~ § ~ ~ z N ~~ ~ / • yl ' V a // I ~ s ~~Ct~t~tT U-l / ,/ • L~ Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ q • `J - -.N . 4 Qr e tl Qa U _ N Z~ 9 a] yy M II3: ,nuO~ ~ N V ~° ~!; Q \ r~f ~ ~~ '~ ggg~777 ~A a~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~,, \ ; a \ '~ ~a ~ ~ \ \\ ~ a \,\ ~ O ~ •, J~ o ~~ \ \;,~ ~ o , \,~ ~'\ ~~ ,~ \ ~~ L b-~ 1~~HS ~3S ~N17 H~1b'W o~i~i~~e~,~3 ~ e ~Qie~~ 31E0~ e S ~ ~, ~f ~~lee ~ ~ S5gd~Ei1t-~3~a~e~ ~ i ~ R B 13EacE°,P~~:1 ~ 5 i GX I 1 ~ 1.8••a ~~~s ~,e; . s" s 31'r !~ - 2 iE 3is~l':~6f ai4i$E Q, R, S, T, U, V ZO g ~ I r i ~~ SSSSSSS9SSIIt ISe-Se ~XHtB~T ~-~ -I =' ~3 - r~ ----- I~, _ -- ~--' - ~ -~ __ e y~ ~ -I a ~ ,~ -r- - - ~ ----- -;--- ~La - --' - ~ --~ ~e ~, i e S S e S S S!-~ f e e l Q, R, S, T, U, V Zt 1 G ~ 8 ~ ~ @ a a • ~ ' w U ~ l0 '. P ^ U Q ~ W g i ~ F W O s Sie ,e F ¢ ~ ^ ^ ^ u ~ a VIQf ~ ~ ~g ~Wg e ` Z 6 ~~ 6 ~p, 6~~." I r ~3 ~3 i• i~ ~, ~ ,~j~, "- \ ''I I ` -4_ ~1 ! i i~ ~, i i~ _ ~_ ii 1 \ II' ~ I ` ~ I t "~~~I - „ r -- '% '~ { I~ ',i ~, --J-'- - - -~-- x ~.______ _ _ __ _ I_ ' i ' } 'i ' _ I ~ ~, ; ' ~ I 1 -- _~ l i i --i---- -~~ '~~ ~~ _ ~~g iee ~~e..leeet6 y~y~ ~-_ nJ ~ _ _ ~yy '1 1 ~I _I ~i _ --~ ---~! r ~~~,,\ ' o° t,. ~3 K2 t _ _ ~~ _i _____ - __ _ 1 Q, R, S, T,U,V ZZ Se eeeeeee.eeeeeeeg~' F ^~ ~ ~I x ~I ~ ~'~yy \ aa'1 ay ~ 8 .~ a 1 ~e~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {E (~~! 6 t a^~ i 1 ~ ~ii~ "s N N U U Q I I w~ K F Lt Q I a e ~Y .~~.~• f~ W ~~ V .. -______ wlsm~.a• ________ _ _ E I _r _ _ _ . iM'IY10 VV _ I _ _ _ _ _ W __ wMLL= =_ - _ __ON ~~ SECTICN'A-A' 1~L f~` SECTpN'B-B' SECTN7N'C-C' -rt __-_-~- =-Pi=---- - I-= -----__ __--_ :- -_ _ ___ 80' 3: RROPOSEO R 0 I t 11 -_ _--50 I _ Eg51 ROW ~~ I I - - -_- ___ `__ I _ I_ _ r - ~- -- Ep i I'- _ I I _____ ________ _ _ I I~ . tl E%IS lINC GROUND _ --- _ _ _ ___ _ ___ _ I FOOTH_I L_L _ __ ._ ~ _ _ _ B ~" R -E" CuU ' _ -__ _ _ _ __ - -- ~ 'r RETAINING WALL - __- _ _ _-- _ ______ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ - PROPOSED - _----__-_- -___-- - -- __ _ ____ ' fOOTXIIL ___ __ _ ' _ - ~ - NiDENING -_ __-----_ __ _ __ __= SCALE f-b' 4 L 4 ~. ~~>° •tla I 1//~// N ---- y //-~- p BE G P{'QAHED FOR CAAE~ Fi0AE9 Pf$!Ji® BY ^^!F Hall & Foreman Inc. ^^r i G~EiV+wN ~"^M SunMN Rok xb~s .aa u.+.... an. .m ..... a weox-.w. naam-.aoo +... ra.v.....+m..~~vn g ~T~ u, • 4 FIRE ACCESS PATH ~6fDaea6 au one iDD~"Q~R7S '• PAil0 I 1 y -ZQ u ~ij F' Eli ~ Isi IY{ 111; g 9 e e ~7 F ~a~ ' ~LS337~ P FY p o n ~°^ e~ w j g ~. i'x ~f - Y e 75 iP G F F !€ 9 Y9 / tltl/ p 1 '?c e I ~ t CY i ~ g ?i i? efi G A9 . I f ~~ ~ j Z Z-0133HS 33S ? pg ~ 8 z Y ° 4 `° r = < eF SI 5 ge'e'! w 14~~~. 0 m 1~~~ y~ fl p e i °il ??5P4 a 9 ~• ~- Q9 g612PF a ~ 552• s g ®e Yi:R ' E6 S~ ~~o ~` fig: -:~ ~F: ~~-a : f 'e¢~ ~ ~ s ®~~ ,a i ®~~6 ~~~: g 'I' { -. F ~ ~. e p~n Y tl ~,. 4 ~i r ~,. Y ~~:. `-~>saYl~°i APE Qeviqq`;i~ s ; '^ 3 ~F f jsa R3Qil3Q:?F~ lil,7~::3 z I. o e - 3 p DO1~e7~.;.{.6ceo.f°.S~; o:. .p i 6 = c 0 ~ Qw ei q E! 33 k ! A ! !ii p i 9i e_ F i $ P C !i w Y. _' g !Y . Fi Y ~ F i .3 iv ~ °} ; ~~~ r "'w m ~i iP : # C o • o.:: t % ®e~~ a ~ F 6C _ igiF ~ I I 1 fl 0 0~., \ ~~ \\\. ~\ ~ ~. ;°~\ \ <<\\ q ~- \ \ ~' ~ ,~ ,\ _ ~ ,, \ ` ~ ~ - ~ ~ << Eii ~~ a €' 'ie - ae < 'F1 o !~ - ~~ ~!fis ~.;~: ~ ~: ~. , w<, ~, ~ ~~ . , . ..;~ , x,,, '.,1 r `~ ~` ~ - ~+ '` ~ ~ I q iorlP'~~, ql~ up ,, ;~ _ - 7 `x ` ;~ ~ . _ N~i'~~' ~ ~ f f-~ .. '~~ ~ ~ J -~., /, r ~ _ ,_ ~~ ,~ ~ i ~ i. ~= s ..._. e .-,- _; •. - _ ' : ' :a I~ ~_ ,4I J F ~ L L ; ~` ,, . , ' ,\_ ' Y• . ~, ~ , ~. ~ '} ~Y'"1' ~ I, ~~ ~~ ~~, l~ ~ I' i, ~~ '~~d ,l~ ~! I,;II .,~ ~.~~ ~'~'1 ii I' d. ~, „~ '~, ,~c~",,I.y i~ Y ~, ~~ ~,. ~ ~ I lul ! ~ ~ h, ~•~~~ a;. , F `` F ,,,- ~~, \ \~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ li W21°J ~ '~S \ I ~I , l` ~. • %. \ \ \ i Ex ! ~~ °~~' , ~ a. ~ ~ 4~3 I ~ ~~~~ ~Y~u\\~~ 441 - . Q, R, S, T, U, V 2S a3s iw ~i~~ ~,lR ~~ ~gg° d~ OV F. ~~¢a e y~ ._ ~Y ~~ ~a ~~~% ~ iii: 3nv a3NVe • u 9 F~ ~° Z Fri k !y!y 7~ E~ ~ ~ • ~~ ~ ~F ~~ 3~ P ~P a=g ~ d" ~5 ~ _ ~ 9 ~ B~ ~~. ~6 ~ ~: . 8 ~ • ~~p i p~ ~ i ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~^ ~~ ~~3 E ~9 6g ~9 ~ 98 ai 98 z Wa o ~W ~ <~ W ~ wo ~ ~~~ Tp w ~~ ~ '-$ w ~~_ ~N x =- H ~o x o~ ° 0 `: z =m 3.c ~' ~ E~ E" C T 0 0 o ^' ° `~ o pp U y° z 0 H a z e ~ w d ~ w a y H ° -" ~ ~ ' U o w e W ra Q 3 w w ` ~"~ r ~ H o x a o a W a Q ~ w Q ~ A o~'~~ ~ g~y$`a € ~e:~~ • ~Xi~fl~~T ~I ~ Q R S T U, V Zl~ ~ ~ 's § ~ 3 F~ an ~ $. E ~ pCp ~ ° ~~ ~ ~ e 7 9 ~ ~~ ~ ~e~~~ ~•~ o~: 3$ ~ ~~€°~ oe€ i ii ^ y~e 3~ ~~ pg ~~:~~~ ~~E 8 ~ ~g ~~8 yECE ; ~• ~; s gg€ 3~ ~ S ~ " ~9~ EY i ~~: ~ ~9 S°~ e9 ~• 90 • aopp ... 8 .~~ .~ • .d .. s8 a s8 z Q ° aA w -a w- -~ w 3 a `a of ¢°,I 5 9 ~~~ 9 i ~.C Y;F ~.} Y~~~ T 0 o ^ ,`~ °o ~# a y° z 0 F Q o w Q • F"a ° w ~ o QR x ~ ~ U wa O W d e wR . w o ; " ~ • U H~ ° ~ Q o ] w U a ~ a A a oa a ,~~ ~~ ~ g~~`a @ ~~~ ~~}~gt~ -~ 2 Q, R, s, T, u, v Z ~ x L~ W --~ C C N 03 • ~° pGtlYpflrOp aMO,Y® NAM w4G nW rn, OYi Ysmf ruc MA aemr oa. xn YYNi ROOF 1ST FLOOR ^~~ ^ BLDG "A" COMPOSITE PLANS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUaTT16605 DRC~k 2003 00637 Rancho Cucamonga, California Y,n,~,.; ..~i\'S~.,,~n... r_^" ..__ ~am.w ^~ 2ND FLOOR ,~;, ~ ~ . ~.~~ s Q,Q. SCiF'~ w s a a °o a a A z N a 0 °a ~. Q a a °o a w F n n b O O O N ~ O . N [-~ [ f'~ ~ 00 a 7 i 0 v z a a ~ W ~l~ o F WD ~, ~, a ~ > U 0 r W Wa" 0 O V • U ~ o ~ w ° Q o U e ~ a C7 `~ Q ..1 G J~~ ~~~a ~ ~ ~~~ € ~° ~7~1'-L1Ul'~ 1 `~ Q, R, s, T, u, V "Z ~ ~ 9 9 E o~' 3 ~c :€ ~5 ~ •~ s C~ oz i e ~o ~gR~ ~E'se~~~~9~ . ~d 8 3C ~~ p e ~ aagg ~3 ~ 5 i g i99 oe~ 8~ i ~~ . w wiiii8 +6 . + ~EcE ~ 4 s~ a °$ € ~~ F ~~ g ~ ; s °e3 sk gga E ~S SS pS a8 ea tl6 z o~ H ap w w- H~ ~~ W l , ti~ x 8 L ~~ ~'i ~.~ 0 o~ `o °o ~ } U N Q O HL l~' z Q p w a . o H~ ~ W a=~ ~/ ~ > o U w° o w o w° p . W a ^ x3• H ~ o Hz a ~ Q a ;7 W V a O ~ ~ C7 A a 04 ~~ g~$`a @ ~ ~~~ g of E~cHl1g1"C ~ 5 Q. R, S, T, U. V 3~ SCI S .~ /~ •~%' -i c 1~\ EXTERIOR MATERIAL,§, CI L FALIS COLO0. COAT8D BCDCCO L RDOP BLHN DOD C11NC0.6r6'fILVd L MILINOt W w IRL VINTL ACRBCB P PATl04 BALCONIPA AND iO1LNHLV® R.V NTBD NITN ACCOM COLOR l OARAOH D00114 NOOD GRAIN iBRTVRHD OYBRNHAD tTHHL tRLTONAL DOO}L MINMD NITII wttanr cal.av x aLav Mva vx aetdwn NooD YAtuw YAmren wrrx Accenr colon R Y.LLL srACRtmnB 1 ORCOMTCVH r11Y RmfLO MCrN ACCBMT COL00. OYBI FYIAY IBpBR TO OHCAIL ON BIIBLT A l L YIDT[HNBi VINTL RVNI'HD Mn'II ALCBNT COLOR C CRINNBT BLHYHNT NICIBRIOR PLABCHR 10. TRBLLD VINTL NDMBBRB CAInrDD NRH ACCBNi COLOR Il nRCOMTVB RKRBRI AND OVrLOORHN} RIdAMM VOOD PAINTHO YITII AfCHNT COLOI 11 }OBr' FHBAMM ICOOD }AINTHO MrCH ACCBNi rnLOa --ti--~~ L e BLDG "B" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS dYaD auntm SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTTI6605 um a.11 DRt DRCR 200300637 Nwpan taY a CN40 rBL an D+wt Rancho Cucamonga, California PAL pNl nBnN ~ C FIOT NO ICC1Y] ® KTOY GRIXIPI~ r~~ CIICBf M alllpl • U WEST ELEVATION o~--~' N NORTH ELEVATION ~,t ~r- r f'~ *>~ _~ r~ W N I [, i C cAmxo xores x..w~R `me u rMSo rl1. a»++sim nAx aR uHan RmY Im lmRli ~ i ~ -1 -4 FS G,- _~ °3 .~ ~i~~a~e~ EAST ELEVATION XTP,ALA MATERIALS 1 i wwLU cawncowran srvcco 1 RMR 8L8NHHD CONCRHfH TILH! 0. RAILINOR IRi m W VIxYL EICRHI] ~ rAT00 HAWONIHG•ANU rdAN81V88 PAIMBO Wf}N ACCBM oD1An ~ owawoe DHDPa wvoD DRUn ivxrDRHD OVH6X18wO fTH8L f8LT]ONAL DOORf PAINI'eD Wlfll wCC iCOWP x Noon awVH ix nexnwx wooD PA+clw rAlxrvD wrtx nicnxr col.oa s wALL srwcRrronn neM0.ATVH TRIM BNCCO MTTI wCCHM COWR OVBI POA4 REPeR r0 H81'.VL ON BXHHI A i 0. EHNTBP! VIML IAINTIO WRH AIGBNT COIAR Y CIIIMNHY HL8M8M 1xT80.10R PLARHR IC TRBLLIR VINYL tl8MH8P8 lAIMtlD w1r11 ACCRNi wLDn v~o vuwNieo vliclRi wncE~cuni coLO~RHHa RrenwN IL rOrr' R88hwN WUOO IAINreU M(fN ACCBM rnWH SOUTH ELEVATION (VIHW FAOM FOOTHILL) e ~ is ^ r~ ^ BLDG "C" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTT16605 DRC# 2003 OOfi37 Rxncho Cucamonga, Ca1lPornix KT6Y GROUF'~ alert AH inNre i_~ fit X ~~~--ll ~1`• ~~J~ V\1 _~D~l ,J.^/ V/ /~ I`W V ~ C 0 ~~ WEST ELEVATION (o ENTRY ADIACENT TO REC BLDG) WEST ELEVATION ~ e I n ~ -~r--`~ NORTH ELEVATION EXTERIO$Sf9TERIALS ~~ L wwLU c-LORmArm tlfxco l poop. vl.ex-aD mxcRRm rn.v x Rwrtroat of ., ix• YINn mc[en . PAnoR BALCONIPD. AND POIHNHLVHL I.VNTIO NRX ALCHXi COLOR OAMOR fNMR! NOO-OHAIN THRNRNO OVHRMHAD LTHHL tBCIIONAL 00040 PAINIH- NIIN ACCHXT COLOR f ROOP CAVC fR RCTAWN N00-PALCIA PAIHTHD W ITM ACCRNT COL04 0. MAIL 1l ACtmVNf1 f -HCOMTIVR TRIN kTVECO NIIH ACCHM COI OH OVOR PoAV RHPHRMORTAIL ON LIINCT Af L OM VTTCR! VINYL PAIHTHD NfLN ACCINT C-LO0. R EHIMNBT HLHMHHT RRTOR100. PLAHfCR le TRlLLa~ YIMYL NHNRHRt PAINiOO WITII ACCYNT COLOR 1 DOCORAIIYH [ICtRRI ANO OIRLOORHPk PH]AWN WOOD PAINTR- WITII AECHNT COLIIR WfTi RRMMN HOOD PAINTYO MffN ACCtlNI CVIAH H • 16 ^ ~- f e BLDG "C" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CAMQO HOMa9 SYCAMORE VILLAS SUHTTI6606 uN plea fNm x..Pee vN,a cA rHN DRC# 2003 00637 P~ wn ~anl Rancho Cucamonga, California Rrar caourl ,.. enlm A I t-NN • u ~ • ~a a- i~ -~-1 i~ _~ p C W nm Qu0 iwba' Nwpan EetA CA 11Y0 lEl. Mnwwf PAZ MfInWM L' amr em aew~ IST FLOOR P P n ^~-^ ~ u BLDG "D" COMPOSITE PLANS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTTI6605 gTGV GROUP: ~^~ DRC# 2003 00637 ®i:.~'- ---- Rancho Cucamonga, Celdornia ~xxxr w~u ui»n ~ ~ .. r 2ND FLOOR -- -- - - -------- - --- -- -- - ---- - - 1 3RD FLOOR /ROOF PLAN }~1 ~~ .~. ~~ ~l ~--1 .~ fJ C IG V ' I ~~ ., 2ND FLOOR __ _ __ ___ ___ __ . _~~r _ __- ,ar. _ _ e ~ u ^~-^ ~ u BLDG "C" COMPOSITE PLANS CAK00 XOM69 SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTTI6605 nm a..u men x..wn wet cA nMe DRC# 2003 00637 rM. wn nuwu rNC wn sswne Rancho Cucamonga, Cehfornia ~ ~ umr no ~mme • __ _ _~ /+~ KT6Y GftOl1Pe~ Pi~Ci?J!1 yV' ,: mum m unuue • L 3RD FLOOR /ROOF PLAN i _ ~ `z > E 3 ., - _ g~ c i 8 ~°+ Y'' Fo °~ : ~' `z o F o 8 ~Z ~` < ue °~i i u ~ i ~ 4e ,, °,~ _ a • .Y ~ _ e ee ° 0 0 Q, ~ yZ a~ o S° s ° ? ou _ ~ i °~ ° ~ r ii = aa ~ <e s z ~ a E im go t ~° ~ ~ _ •i o 6 a E~ r kC° ~ t°c ~ m i "'; 3 O O '~O G ° Y i> Q> >o ~ KI ~ B ~~9 om°y 8, : o°p ~ ~9 08 0 8~= t~ ~~ ~~ ~~ tu xvw sc z o G' H >^ w -a ~% er W a=-~ 6 ~ is 9:~ Y ~• Y=~ m 0 0 o^ .~ ~ N ~~ ~, v a z N° 0 F a z o w a ¢ w m ? Ha ~ w >a a ~ ~ w~ o w e a/ E wa ~ o M ~r ~ ~ ~ w U a ~ A ( /~ A °zd~~a g °~' ~! : zd~m" ~?_._ U ~xI '4 ~ ~? T i 1 Q, R, s, T, ~, ~ 3 to ~ - a 9 ~ ~ a g~ Fv o= m~ 3 ~ ' ~< m °u t m v ~e 3 ~i ~ ~e ~ ~ c o f 2 1q~ ~ o 4 ~ <e < ~ ~ ~ Oy O \~ ~~ O ,,-, y 6~ < Z Q a p0 ~ o f ~ CQ f~ p~ Cj F a ~ G= O ~Oj FZ fpof s ~ v O4 L < d 6 ~ Y ~ ~ Z >° ~o L jY i 0 i C~ ~ v y y 47 0 ~ ~~ ~ Zy m r x ~ i is 0 ~ z ~ Oi EE b'~ aK9 >mk~ 4 :~x a, ~ ~~ 09~ am " 3,, ~< _ ~ ~a . '~ , v $t• ~'C~ uzrow .s o `' I ~ I W a ~1 9Pd .L33HS 33S -:~~ `~ • g ~ •~ ~ o-= 3 i VVR>.•., F•. ,~ Y-a. 0 0 a `^ .~ g ~ N ~p U a z y° 0 H z o w dm E-+, o ,~ W a~ ra ~o a 0.; ~ W Wa ~ Wo Wa ~" W OE e n U ^ F ~ ~ ~ V ~ O ~ I ^ V, ~ , w v' U A a L' ~=) :_ ._ a o=°~= ° ~3`a`a ~ 0 ~a~~~ • ~xN ,. t3+T` `. 2.. Q, R, s, T, u, v 3 ~ i y ' a ~ o< ~ a o 1 ~ ^z ° _ - m " e ~ :~ ° a 9 m m` S K ~ ¢ `i J ° i r.~1~ C E ~~ tl Z ~ S ° ° ° = m ~ o° m °'" j c i C . °_ z z8 g ° iz z ~~ ¢° ly ~ ~ u is w e ~ m <m ~~ i °° s ~° Z n i~ ° F ~ m r i 5 ~~ ~ ~n Z Y~ g yyy V° ea `c6 } a ~~ ~ ~i 2 j t Yj >< O ° m ` c~ ~ co 'm i ~:? r'e ` ~ x r ~ ~ g i ° °s 91 V .1HdHS H2S_ ~~~~ z ~~~ _ ~ ~~ ~ __ ~ _ ¢ , w ° a w- . r W .~. 3 O 1 ~ \ \\ ~I> ~i ~, ,,, L'. I ill a~ i ''~~ gl ii ~e.i ~ 5~ ~~ T.~ Y~c >! m 0 0 r n 0 0 ~ e N m y N O F.~ Q o w Q a a a ~ ~"; °w ~ = >o _ °~ ~ ~ w~ a o w e ~ wa .~ ~ tl ~ w a . O u U ^ ¢ RiZ w ~ ~ ~ ~ z A ~ V °s~ ~ s s~ s c. °m~ dd z ua~~~ ,Ri i ~7C2"'t~,`~" ,~ ? ~ Q, R, S, T, U, V 3 8 W \~~ (~ Y ~, ~~ .--~.. CAtlBD a0tla1 noa a. eu.a x..r~aa a nave rea. d>f ntaoa rAx d~ awn ~ 7 cmr xu annn • ~ i ryI I ^ '~~ ~ u BLDG "E" COMPOSITE PLANS SYCAMORE VILLAS Rancho Cucamonga. California 3RD FLOOR /ROOF PLAN 2ND FLOOR IS'I' FLOOR SUBTT16605 DRC# 2003 00637 KT6Y (31IX1P1 ..~ eneir A n uann c U ~ ,l~l i _~ ~t7 "l _f..! (n _~ O 11_ _ ~I Inu1~4~N ~ ~I -- Y P~ ~ , 1111r ~_ ~ ~I ~~ ~ II II II WEST ELEVATION cAreeo non/w nm w.v mw Nwren bM. CA C}MC THI. wnwwe rAR MCI NLnN INIT NO ]OrMII EAST ELEVATION L' EXTERIOR pfq'~$il_IAI~ ~ wwLU COLOtl.cOwTRD nvciv i ROOP eLRN-vn CONfRIR-TIL® A PAILINOtr 1%f er I.G VIxTL nCRnre ~ 1AT104 rALCtlN101. AN- rOlf NILV DO rA1NTNn «rtfl ACLRM COWR e OARAOr OOnR/ «OOO ORAIN Tn%TVRND wNRMYw- Rent rvCnONwL WO0.e IAIMN- MITN ACCtlNT COLOR smr vwvn u anwwn woon ewx1A rwmtan wlTx wcevM cows a wu.l_ erwctlnnNv r -vmunva TnIN~ erDCCO wrrN wccvM wl.-n wva roAe/ Reeva TD -eruL on exevr we a exvrrnne nML ruxra- wRCI Accent town a CNINNBT nLWOM CRTIR/OI PL/JiN0. 10 T LLIS YINTL MINOnr! rA1NTNV «ITn ACCRNi COIAR . -ncnawmv Rn:tlcus wx--vnoD%nne RrYwx wao- PuxTVn wnn ALCaM town rx wwo rw~nreo «ITN wccnM SOUTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) v e a ^~1~^ BLDG "E" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTT16605 DRC# 2003 00637 Raacho Cucamonga, California f+~ NT6V GROIR= /NICTAN avem L "'~ NORTH ELEVATION--~~ - ; -~ el- - ~ ©-- ~ o- ~ i i ~~ 'C'SC: `(':1 id ~ j ~ ~ ~ Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 1 w ~ _ Nr~c ' I c i( NO,c ~. v 9 Y ~•• ~QVaii Y•. it a w ~ Q a 0 zw ~ aNwF F° d c o y7< e o0 Ny N ~ o P. V H m a NG w (/~ OJ a ~ ,~ m NO ~ U° d'wa3 _ H Q ~ a U Q7Q dig ~ rTl W m d NNZd ®P1F . a ~/ W E zwox E" O m amw`- ~ ~ ~ e ~ ' U W~? ¢ u m ~ C a w y 0 .-n N m0 Now ~-~U w a (ayH~ N^ a z 3 ^wag ~ ~~~ ~z~ ~nPFd d ;~ggSS °: =~ ~aZ~7 ~ a 0. • • • >C I . a~ ~.- w ~~ ~' .~ ~T /Y^ V' N •-~,. , -- -- - --- ,> ~. _. ,. _ ~`~' .~ b \~ _ ~ ~JJ W ~ ~aa~ ^^ ~ 1\ ~~ -~ ~~ -" ~ ~ ¢\ j ,,_ ,i.,,I i. um P+Y eeaenME9 x..P=n l.»a cA mw Pei. MnPawi PAR MII aDal{ _ L lmr xo ifelfe 1, ~l r ~ ~ ~_. / ---A _' o o ' _-~' ~, ~ -_ Y ][^ ~ to - - -- - - -------- - --- - ~ 1- ,. e ~,~,. 1elerIe 2968 S.F. 0 A 16 ^ -fit{-- L~ x e REC BLDG PLAN SYCAMORE VILLAS Rancho Cucamonga, CalifornPa SUDTTI6604 KTfSY GROUP ~.. DRC# 2003 00637 ~:~ • if =~-=.. i1100f A{) 111140] t~~ -^~ w ~~ ~~ ~s, =~ W ~ ~, 7 • PLAN 2 - 2 AR / 2BA 1143 5 F PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 245 SF CAN80 a0tA8f nw a..~ xwgen CA eflb vu- wn n*w~ vAx. wn ~nem Aror xo vwewv IST FLOOR PLAN 3 2 BR / 2HA TOWN 1256 S F PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 235 SF R4xAO6 ]lf V a e ~e [7 ~-- ;] t UNIT PLANS SYCAMORE VILLAS Rancho Cucamonga, California SUBTTI6605 DRCR 2003 00637 3RD FLOOR ~~r~iy KT6V GROUPS ~~ ~T/r_^ ~'e y_ evc~t A u uueu _i ~~ -,- -- 2ND PLOOR krr-- ,.4 Vlq ~- 1 L} r..~ l~ V! c S L --~-~ EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION cAaaeo xomea nY DWu wWI NwPeN NY6 G HW TPL MTf]SY1a PAx MN HeeM E2STEAS79 R_MATB RI AL9_ L WALU coma rnAreo eTDCCo v aoor paexonD cDNCRere mn mxve IRa W uL YINTL ncaan r ewnoa ewicowea wxv lDTSnevvli rwlNreD Nml wccpirr coven • OARAOtl 000RHi WOOOOWNrBI(TVRHD VVBIMBAV RBBL epCT10NAL OOOVH rNNTeO MTII wCCBM COLOI ~ Roor ewvm u Rmwwx wovD PAecu eNNreD IlH wccaxT cows W.v.a ermoroxa f OBCORwr1VB TRIP LTVCCO WITH AOCBNT COLOR OVna PO.W RBlea r0 DRTwIL ON exv8i A i L eHVRVae~ YINTL rNNinD MTN ACl-BNT COLOB R CNIYNBT L.pMBNT HRri0.10B PIABCeR Ie IReLLIe YINTL YBMBHRB rNNTBD Wlrll .KCHNt COLOR 11 DHCORATIVH nICn80.e wNO OVTLOORON RMwWN W000 9.V NTpD WIrN .KCBNT COLOR li tOel` R8]wNN WOOD rNMHD WITN MGMT -°-~- ~ a e REC BLDG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTT16605 DRC# 2003-0063'7 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahfomia /!~ KT6V GROIPI~. KdvIJ r :.I.T 611[LT w li IIIICtl ^ xroT xD NeNla r = € ~ pm i i = V y a ° ° ` ` '_ F~ i~ ! ~< m e t °s i b' x` < ~o $ g u oe F ~9„g ° Ex`e ;4p & $ o= p m e i b 3 c~ ~ 8E` ~ w e i~ p~ if po a ~° ; p 9 m$ o g < ~S~' ~ ~oo9s r=s „C8 m s8 ~m K F m6 ~ d ~ ra = V p Rp q p $ y •' ~ Fm 8 o e i SC9 io F9 o e 9 <~ s v O i:~d D<ya~;a< =m ~;~ u _ t$ a° ~ M dSU e~< Ma i np J • dy .a 'J Il ~z-a~ ,~ _ ~ ~.~ - :~ ifs- ,~~~`~;1`~-<3, ~- ,~_ i.~`g ;( ,7 ~t ~, ^,v I ~~ , ~i~ L z O .-c ~'=} T' ,~ 4l W 3 f~aaJ[P ~ ,~ 1 ~ . {~ ~~ 'y; >.- ~:~ Y_y r b O 0 O ^ ° `° o ~ N F t" ~ m U z a y~ 0 H z w ~ ~ ~ a ~ F' r ~ ~ ~° ro/ °'~ T '~ ~ +, ~ J ~ S g ~ ~ )) r1 s ~ J F i.Ty ~~ ~ V !9 ~„ ° ~ r ••'1 e ~ r ~ ~ 1 } C ` d ~ y r K! ~ /~ / iWl W ~ <a~ c EE~a m =figg?? °_ saF~7 • Q, R, S,T'~'V ' ~ ~ - housing portion along San Bemardlno Road With elther plan, she felt the architecture needs to be supenor • Commissioner Stewart saki that she dId not care for elther design as presented be they both look over built. While she commented that she dId not care for auto-courts added that she could support an auto-court plan that has an appropnate amount of open She believed that a tRoute 66estreetscapePrShe feltth ghsquallty landscaping Isgn oot d along thee Foo9h II Boulevard frontage. Chairman Macias agreed Nnth Commissioner Ste at he was not fond of the auto court concept; however, he preferred the auto-court plan bungalows along Foothill Boulevard had merit wlthian Commissioner Stewart's suggestion reg 9 the "Route 66" context. He also be d that both plans appear too dense and that a reduction in units might be warranted He dad by saying that any plan needs to be pedestrian friendly and a tot lot is a must for the ex Brad Buller, City PI er, summanzed the comments of the Commission. He stated that the plans conform to the 's multiple family density range. Further he added that single story bungalow type elements d be appropriate along Foothill Boulevard and that such features might provide a less dense earence from the major street frontage. He advised the applicants that they could move r„ with submittal of a Design Review application for elther type of project ..... NEW B_ U 4LBTT1Bfi05 AND DEVELOPMENT • g. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ~- REVIEW DRC2003-00637 -SYCAMORE TOWN HOMES -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOGATES - A pre..Appllcation Revlew to consider a conceptual design concept for the proposed development of ti6 town homes and 133 flats on 20.00 acres of land in the Western Foothill Boulevard Muted Use Comdor area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Dlstncts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bemardmo Road and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-101-31 and 34. Brad Buller, Clty Planner, introduced the item and gave an overview of the Pre-Application Rewew des gn overall and itssrelaU'onship to theosurtoundmg erea.op ~s to look at the proposed project Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Assoaates, introduced the development team and gave an overview of the profeC. He Indicated that the protect is currentty going through the development process with the City, and added that there have been some revisions to the project layout that were not reflected on the plans the Commissioners received for the workshop However, he thought the Commissioners an esthand flattened out ann areanhowever, they have not been able to d scoverowho grading on the prop rty did it. Victor Mahony, Chief Financial Officer for Cameo Homes, discussed the proposed probed in detail Using photo simulations of the sde for reference, he explained the proied layout. He also noted that the adiacent property owner, Sycamore Inn, Is In support of the project. Chns Glamm~l, Associate Landscape Architect, added that the applicant's intention is to save as many trees on-site as possible ~JU~~`~ -~ August 13, 2003 /~r~ dloumed Minutes Q, R, S, T, U, V ~~ • Commissioner Fletcher asked the developer if the protect was a gated commurnty The developer indicted it would be Warren Morelron, Assistant Planner, pointed out the following four key items for the Planrnng Commissioners to consider 1) Development on hillside slopes 30 percent or greater, 2) Building heights exceeding 30 feet in the Hillside Overlay, 3) Architecture of the buildings, and 4) Layout of pnvate open space and entrances. Mr. Buller, stated his contain with the proposed probed as it relates to the Htllside Ordinance. He indicated that the project, as proposed, does not meet the Hillside Ordinance. He also stated his contain with the photo simulations the applicant presented to the Commissioners because they did not appear to accurately depict the proposed development on the hillside. He noted that the existing Sycamore Inn pariung lot on the east side of the restaurant would be separated from the restaurant by the development of the Foothill Boulevard entrance to the protect, but felt comfortable that pedestnan access from the parking lot to the restaurant crossing over the project entrance can be worked out He questioned whether d was possible to save trees wnth the proposed grading scheme that will mass grade the site and fill in the natural ravines. He indicated that in his conversations with the owner of the Sycamore Inn, their support for probed was very conditional. He stated that cross sections and sight line analysis from the Red Hill town homes is important. Mr Buquet said that they will submit a section through every unit on Red Hill Mr. Giannini clarified that the only trees that the developer could possibly save were on the perimeter of the probed because of the pro~ed's mass grading concept. Commissioner Stewart stated she likes the project location next to the Sycamore Inn restaurant and wants it to move forward. She also indicated that she would like the ske to be designed with a village feel that included wood motif street signs and other elements. Commissioner Fletcher stated he liked the overall concept of the probed, however, was contained the misleading depiction of the project on the photo simulations. He asked the applicant to revise the simulations to be more reflective of the actual protect proposed. Commissioner Macias echoed Commissioner Stewart and Fletcher's feelings for the project. He indicated that the protect was unique He stated, that although there could be issues with the probed, he thought they could be worked out He also thought it was important for the applicant to submit realistic photo simulations of the project so the Commissioners could get a true picture ofthe proposed proined He then directed the applicant to work future issues out with staff and the Sycamore Inn Mr. Buller summanzed the comments of the Commission and directed the applicant to move forward with the development process .. C, pR - ICATION REVIEW DRC2003-00733 - HOGLE IRELAND, INC - A review of conceptua n concept for the proposed development of 10 duplexes consisting of 20 units and 5 single-fame es on 4 20 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (48 dwelling units per acre) Foothill Distnds (Subarea 3), located south of Foothill Boulevard, at the terminus of Hampshire evon Streets - APN 020&331-1 B. This item was continued to August 27, 2003, request of the applicant. ...,. _~ August 13, 2003 PC Adtoumed Minutes Q, R, S, T, U, V C-{ g DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 20 p m Larry Henderson August 17, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A residential subdivision of 7 lots for condominium purposes on 21 acres of land in the Western Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area of the Foothill Districts (Subarea 1), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-101-13, 31, and 34 Related files Development Review DRC2003-00637, Minor Exception DRC2003-01082, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 225 condominiums on 21 acres of land in the W estern Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Corridor area of the Foothill Districts (Subarea 1) located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue - APN• 0207-101-13, 31, and 34 Related files• Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Minor Exception DRC2003-01082, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 Design Parameters• The site is located in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant The site contains 71 heritage trees. To the north are the Red Hill Condominums (Medium Residential 8-14 dwelling umt per acre). To the west is the Sycamore Inn, vacant land, and single-family homes. To the east is the elevated and abandoned Pacific Electric Railway corridor To the south is Foothill Boulevard, and further south, Knocker's • bar, and an automotive repair shop The properties to the west are Mixed-Use (MU) land use, and • Office/Commercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adtacent to the medium density residential development. The most significant design challenge is the steep topography, in which 34 percent of the site is greater than 30 percent slope Development on land with over 30 percent slopes requires both Development Code and General Plan Amendments The proposed protect must also be designed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter 17.32, Foothill Boulevard Districts, Guidelines for Development of Subarea 1 The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) An Historical Assessment of the protect site was conducted by Stephen R Van wormer in May 1990, and revealed the following: four historic resources were identified as a result of research and field survey and include 1) the Cucamonga Stage station site, 2) the Sycamore Inn, 3) the Red Chief Motel (recently demolished), and 4) the San Bernardino Museum Archaeological Information has noted the presence of two previously recorded historic badges (CHS-1786-1 andCHS-1786-6) as well as the old Los Angeles to San Bernardino road route (PS-BR-3-H) adtacent to the protect boundaries These resources are outside the protect area and will not be impacted It is noted that the Sycamore Inn site is affected from asite-specific impact, since the main access to the residential protect is through the parking lot. Careful attention to the current restaurant needs of the Inn must be considered with the residential design so that the economic viability of this unique historical resource is not adversely affected Pre-Application Review The Planning Commission conducted a workshop on August 13, 2003 (see attached minutes) Staff identified four mator issues 1) development on hillside slopes 30 percent or greater contrary to the Hillside Development Ordinance, 2) building heights exceeding 30 feet • maximum allowed in Hillside areas, 3) architecture, and 4) private open spaces and entrances. The • Commissioners (Macias, Fletcher, Stewart) liked the overall concept and provided direction to applicant C~~~~1 ~ `~ Q, R, S, T, U, V ~~ DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16605 AND DRC2004-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • August 17, 2004 Page 2 Staff Comments. The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues wdl be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect 1 View Protection - As an infdl, hillside site, consideration and sensitivity to protection of neighbors' views is critical The applicant has provided sight-line sections through each adtoining Red Hdl Condominwm unit The developer was asked to conduct a neighborhood meeting to obtain community input prior to this meeting 2 Architecture -The Community Recreation Bwlding is well articulated with a high degree of materials and definite 360-degree architecture policy compliance. However, the multi-family bwldings are not on the same level of architectural development and lack sufficient articulation of the building planes for the ends and rear Because of the relatwe large massing of the residential structures, additional movement of the building planes is recommended. In addition, the stacked stone should be an element that is utilized on all sides of the proposed residential architecture 3 Bills dle bu do g enOvelohped The IOrdn ante en clurages steppe g bwlding cThesappl cants requesting a Development Code Amendment to resolve this issue; however, the Committee . should still discuss whether the upper floors should be stepped back more than the 2 to 3 feet proposed to soften the height impact. 4 Tree Preservation -The site contains 71 heritage trees on-site, including Oak, Sycamore, Pepper, Elm, and a few Eucalyptus trees The City tree ordinance, which states, `The Eucalyptus, Palm, Oak, Sycamore, Pine, and other trees growing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are a natural aesthetic resource which helps define the character of the city Such trees are worthy of protection in order to preserve the scenic beauty, prevent sod erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air pollution ° An Arbonst Report (Dawd Evans and Assoaates, September 2003) identified the existing conditions of the trees and reported on their type and general health (predominately focusing on Sycamores, Oaks, and Ornamentals) Pertaining to sycamore trees, if drainage is altered, it may affect the amount of water that the sycamores receive The trees could be adversely effected if they were to receive significantly less water than they have received historically Should this be, the developer should be regwred to replace the lost water with an irrigation system In addition, it is recommended that grading be prohibited with the drip line of trees, which are to be protected in place Also, it is recommended that the drainage source or proposed irrigation be designed in such a manner that additional moisture is not encouraged at the base of a tree trunk or allowed to collect immediately adtacent to the tree truck, as this can cause rot There are 44 heritage trees are located in the northwest corner of the site. This is an area that has been revised by the applicant, since the Pre-Application Review, to reduce the number of buildings from three to two and shifted the on-site driveway to the west. The arborist recommended preservation of 35 on-site trees The developer is proposing to save 25 on-site trees, however, 10 of these are not those recommended by arborist. Preservation of all 35 trees recommended by arborist would require mator site plan revisions Further, based upon the Arborist Report, staff believes that the proposed improvements would cause the demise of ® four trees the developer has proposed to save Tree #s 39, 43, 45, and 59 The Tree Preservation Ordinance establishes the following priorities 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved-in-place, then trans olwntstock avai ableslThe deve opeass resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery g proposing to plant hundreds of new trees, ranging from 15-gallon up to 36-inch box. Q, R, S, T, U, V S'D DRC ACTION COMMENTS SUBTT16605 AND DRC2004-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 17, 2004 • Page 3 Secondary Issues: Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 Recreation Amenities -The protect requires a minimum of five amenities, however, onlythree qualifying amenities have been provided Most of the items proposed do not qualify under Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.08 040 H gazebos, trellis, and individual rooms within the Recreation Building (kitchen, billiards, exercise) Only one BBO facilityatthe pool is shown, hence, does not meet the regwrement for more than one Also, staff recommends that a tot lot be provided for children (to qualify, multiple tot lots are required). 2. Architecture -The remote garages and trash enclosures are plain in comparison to all the other buildings, with stucco being the sole wall surface material. The incorporation of the stacked stone would create an integrated appearance to the overall protect 3. Architecture -Vary garage door designs. 4 Grading - In at least three locations near on-site driveways or parking lot, 5-foot retaining walls are proposed which exceeds the 3 5 feet (downslope) and 4 feet (upslope) allowed under Hillside Development Ordinance The applicant is requesting a Development Code Amendment to resolve this issue. 5 Grading - "Brow ditches," "bench drains,' and cross and down drains are a prominent feature • of this protect The Hillside Development Ordinance requires speaal "naturalized appearance" with river rock as a liner or within a closed drainage pipe 6 A mailbox center should be incorporated into the recreation bwlding or designed as a stand alone structure designed m keeping with the architectural style and materials of the complex Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the applicant re-design and re-submit the protect based on staff and Committee comments as appropriate Desian Review Committee Action: Members Present Fletcher, Fong, Stewart Staff Planner Larry Henderson The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff to resolve the following critical design areas and return to the Committee for further review of the revised plans 1 The height and mass of the buildings needs to be reduced. Increasing the height of retaining walls and greater variation in bwldmg and roof planes is required 2 The amenities package is not adequate and a tot lot needs to be added as well as spreading out the amenities to a greater level and making the main recreation area more centralized to all the units • 3 The Sycamore Inn entry area is not acceptable and must be safe as well as workable for the operation of the Inn 4 Greater definition and planning for Heritage Tree preservation needs to be addressed Q, R, S, T,U,VSI • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8 10 p m Larry Henderson January 31, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A residential subdivision of 8 lots for condominium purposes on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within the Foothill distracts (Subarea 1), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Pacific Road Right Way -APN 0207-101-13, 01 and 34 Related files: Development Review DRC2003-00637, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominwms on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Corridor area within the Foothill Distracts (Subarea 1), located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Pacific Road Right Way - APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related files. Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - • Parking lot, loading area modifications, and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant, located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard -APN. 0207-101-24 Related files. Variance DRC2005-01061, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, and Development Review DRC2003-00637 Variance DRC2005-01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - Variance request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant on property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard at the intersection of San Bernardino Road -APN 0207-101-24 Related files Minor Development Revew DRC2004-00826. Desion Parameters The site is located in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant The site contains 71 heritage trees To the north is Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre) and is developed with the Red Hill Condominwms, to the west is the Sycamore Inn, vacant land, and single-family homes, to the east is the elevated and abandoned Pacific Electric Railway corridor, and to the south is Foothill Boulevard, and further south, Knocker's bar and an automotive repair shop The properties to the west are Mixed-Use (MU) land use, with Office/Commercial to the southwest Red Hill Country Ciub Drive, and beyond the Red Hill Golf course, is located northwest of the protect site, adtacent to the medwm density residential development The most significant design challenge is the steep topography, of which 34 percent of the site is greater than 30 percent slope Development on land with over 30 percent slopes regwres both Development Code and General Plan Amendments The proposed protect must also be • designed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter 17 32, Foothill Boulevard Districts, Guidelines for Development of Subarea 1 ~N~ ff/ I I ~ Q, R, S, T, U, V 5 Z DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16605/DRC2003-00637, -00826, AND -01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 31, 2006 Page 2 • The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) An Historical Assessment of the protect site was conducted by Stephen R Van Wormer in May 1990, and revealed that four were identified as a result of research and field survey and include: 1) the historic resources Cucamonga Stage station site, 2) the Sycamore Inn, 3) the Red Chief Motel (recently and 4) the presence of two previously recorded historic bridges (CHS-1786-1 and demolished) , as noted by the San Bernardino Museum Archaeological Information, as well as CHS-1786-6) , the old Los Angeles to San Bernardino Road route (PS-BR-3-H) adtacent to the protect boundaries These resources are outside the protect area and will not be impacted. It is noted that the Sycamore Inn site is affected from asite-specific impact, since the main access to the residential protect is through the parking lot Careful attention to the current restaurant needs of the Inn must be considered with the residential design so that the economic viability of this unique historical resource is not adversely affected Pre-Apol~cation Review. The Planning Commission conducted a workshop on August 13, 2003 (see attached minutes) Staff identified four mator issues. 1) development on hillside slopes 30 percent or greater is contrary to the Hillside Development Ordinance, 2) bwiding heights exceeding 30 feet maximum allowed in Hillside areas, 3) architecture, and 4) private open Stewart) liked the overall Fletcher M , acias, spaces and entrances The Commissioners ( concept and provided direction to the applicant. Design Review Committee The Committee reviewed the protect on August 17, 2004, (Fletcher, • Stewart, Fong). See attached minutes. Staff Comments Staff has met with the applicant on many occasions since the previous meeting and the following changes have been made• 1 The protect was re-designed to reduce the height of the buildings adtacent to Foothill Boulevard by changing from three-story to two-story, and reoriented those structures 90 degrees In addition, the remaining structures and pads were lowered several feet into the site topography to further reduce visual impacts. The changes also resulted in reducing the number of units from to 225 to 206 The protect has added a tot lot and barbeque area to the center and east end of the 2 . protect, respectively, in order to address the amenities package the Committee recommendation. The applicant respectfully declined to move the main recreation area to amore central location 3 The Sycamore Inn entry area concerns have been addressed through revisions to the related Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 The historic Sycamore Inn parking lot has been included as part of the protect application package and a Variance Application has also been filed as required as part of the MDR for less than the regwred street setback 4. The applicant has submitted a revised Tree Study from David Evans and Associates, Inc , dated February 2005 (included with plans) As indicated by the submitted Landscape Plan • (see Sheets L-1 and L-2) the changes to the Condominwm and Restaurant Site Plans have further reduced the number of heritage trees that are affected (to be removed) Q, R, S, T, U, V ~j 3 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT16605/DRC2003-00637, -00826, AND -01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 31, 2006 • Page 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval subtect to Committee comments as appropriate. Attachments Design Review Committee Action Members Present Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Larry Henderson The applicant presented colored plans and a written statement responding to all staff comments The Committee recommended approval of the protect I~1 U • Q, R, S, T, U, Vrjy January 30, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEB 0 4 2004 Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Deaz Crty Council RECEIVED • PLANNING ~ ~, ,~ rv OF RANCHO COCAA++ON ~ ~. ~ ~.,, rT,. , r, ~., FEB 0 2 2004 7,8,9,10,1 1 12, +,L,3,4,~,a There are signs posted on Red Ilill Country Dnve across from the golf course and I believe on Foothill around the Sycamore Inn regarding Notice of Filing We are very much against the condos and homes The City has already taken FooUill and made it a very unfriendly Ivghway by making it a divided highway When driving eastbound, rt is almost impossible to turn into a business on the north side without traveling a long distance to a signal and then waiting forever to make a U-turn and, of course, the same is true when traveling westbound and wanting to shop at business on the south side The azea m question is the north side of Foothill, west of the Cucamonga Charnel There are already signals at Grove, San Bernardino Road at Sycamore Inn, Baker, for the new residentuil azea on the south side of Foothill, and at Vineyard More housing on the north side will create more traffic problems because there will be vehicles coming from both the north and south sides of Foothill Because of the congestion on Foothill between Grove and Vineyazd, people aze already traveling over Red Hdl to avad the traffic Citizens have called the police to have them monitor the traffic on Red I-hll, but nothing has been done City is allowing a new multi-dwelling on the west side of Vineyard, south of Foothill and a shopping center The Albertson shopping center has already created traffic problems in the area and now you want to create more traffic problems azound the comer The City has also allowed more housrng on the west srde of Camehan, north of Red Hill Country Club Dnve This is already a very dangerous area and has caused yet another signal to be installed-creating three signals between Foothill and Baseline Because of the opening of the 210 Freeway, we have a lot more industrial trucks traveling up and down Carnelian wlvch the street does not seem to be bwlt to handle the excessive weight of these trucks We hope the Council will not allow the development This is such a lustonc area it should be left alone Sincerely, Charles and Lynda Teenor 8731 Red I-hll Country Club Drive Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~y~~rT i/ Gt, R, S, T, U, V • i r~ ~~ LJ Dale 8 Barbara Pnce 8066 Calle Carabe Place Rancho Cucamonga, Ca- 91730 August 27, 2004 The CIty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Attn: Mr. Brad Buller Ref: Cameo Homes Proposed Sycamore Villas The above proposed development has made a lot of people extremely unhappy. The residents of Red Hill On-The-Green as well as the residents of Red Htll proper have chosen to live to that area precisely because of the location: the serenity of the area, the abundance of cotters and the ambiance of a generation long forgotten. The proposed project volt negatively Impact both Red Htll and the adjacent Rancho Cucamonga areas in numerous ways: -~ Create traffic problems - on Red Hill Country Club Dr as well as on Foothill Blvd. ~ Land movement -potential storm drainage problems, land slide and fire hazards ~ Development has inadequate parking/garage -vehicles most likely left on the street ~ Pool/Rec Room (for 200+ units and families) is located directly below Red-Hill•On-The- Green which translates into an unbearable noise traveling "upwind". The shenff's department might as well rent a unit on site. ~ Project will negatively impact the value of [he surrounding area -~ Overcrowd existing schools Purchasing a home is probably the stogie largest ftnanoal decision that many of us will make. Most of us, at least partly, base this dectston on the rural character of the area. We have been residents to Rancho Cucamonga for over twenty-five years. While tt would be naive to think that the area would never be developed, we certainly hoped the aty would preserve the existing character and not compromise the integnty of the history of our qty. In 2001 the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department posted their General Plan. This Plan was based on a long-term vision of the community, identifying values and qualities that will guide the evolution over the next 20 years. These values and qualtttes Included the following~ A belief in our families and the need to promote their well-being; An abtdtng respect for the hentage we share. An unusually strong dedtcatton to community planning. It is in the spint of the City's Intent that we strongly oppose the proposed Sycamore Villa Development. Sincerely, Dale @ Barbara Pnce Q, R, S, T, U, V 5!A bep CITY GF F,kf~i;i~G GUS%idiuNGA City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA , 91730 Attn Plamm~g Dept Re Sycamore Villas P~~,R ~ 1 2005 ~~~;_,, ~~ _ ~~ °,~ninc Crentlemen, I can't believe this ill conceived protect has surfaced once again I can't Dunk of a single advantage of having such a project m Rancho Cucamonga I'd hke to list a few key ob~ecUOns 1) Extremely high density as compazed to any nearby projects Tlus can only reduce property values 2) Insufficient pazkmg Ow condom~mum homes (Red Hill) have two and three caz gazages This project will create widespread parking problems and blocked access roads 3) Twohundredsix (206) amts with one swimming pooh This is going to create a health hazard of untold proportions 4) "Young Professionals" This project looks hke entry level housing to me and will lead to slum or ghetto condittons m a short time 5) Just recently we expenenced severe mud-slide srtuattons all over Southern Cahfonua Any heavy dirt movement ~s swe to cause some real problems to the existing homes as well as any new butldtngs 6) The developers call this a high-end project, yet most of the amts are under 1,000 square feet of living space T}us isn't even apartment sized 7) The increased traffic dumped onto Foothill Blvd will cause even more gndlock 8) The emergency entry/exit on Red Ihll Country Club nght m the middle of a cwve is extremely dangerous 9) Overall this protect degrades what ow city is all about I sincerely hope that ow city planners come to then senses and remove this project for the books Sincerely, Burt ~c Nancy'~SGourt 8485 Red I-hll Country Club Dr Rancho Cucamonga Q, R, S, T, U, V S~ • CITY OF Fi(1iCl,~-.u ~~Ch~:~ONGA 8082 Calle Carabe Place ! ~nl`. (1 ~ Zo~~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 February 28, zoos ~~(~~""-~ '" ",NNING Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Attention Mr Larry Henderson 10500 Crv~c Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE Proposed Sycamore Villas Protect Dear Mr Henderson and Members of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department We attended the recent meeting regarding The Sycamore V Alas and have some very serous issues which need to be resolved Therefore, we were very disappointed to discover, by Mr Buquet losing his temper, that the property is thew already and they can do as they wan[ as long as codes are followed Frankly, they must be very confident that this protect will be approved by Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department That's a red flag in our book The Police have been called out numerous tunes in our area due to the noise and music at the "Strawberry Patch " It is located grate a bit farther away than the proposed Recreation Room and Pool Area The high • density will produce a lot of nurse at all horns whrch will travel up the Gulch and hdl and affect nearly everyone in our Red Hill Green Association It definitely will be considered a nwsance call which will keep our Police from more unportant dunes We felt we were not told all the truth about the socalled emergency entrance/exit on Red Htll Dr People exning or entenng from this road will create even more hazardous condmons on Red Hill Dr and the other roads on this hill At fast we were told that only emergency vehicles would use this road but at this meeting Mr Buquet said that maybe rust for the first yeaz that would be the case Another red flag is upi As far as we can tell, the builder and people associated wttt~ this group aze in for the money and then they will move on and we are left with the noise, view changes in some instances, and traffic affecting our so-far wonderful quality of life The city of Rancho Cucamonga must be diligent in order to insure quality of life to all of it's citizens and voters We urge you to address these rssues before approving any of this protect Sincerely, Ken and Helen Brown cc Brad Buller, Ctty Planner cc Rancho Cucamonga Shenff Station cc Charles Joseph Associates u b Q. R. S, T, U, V ~ b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MaR O1 2005 RECEI~~~~ -PLANNING Dear Sirs, The peace, safety, and value of our homes will be significantly threatened by the proposed Cameo Homes "Sycamore Villas" project - a 206 unit project located on 20 acres at the NWC of baker and Foothill Blvd. In Rancho Cucamonga. These very high-density apartment-like structures will degrade the value of our homes on the hill above the proposed site. The grading required to develop this site may create serious instability of our hillside. The many rodents that now inhabit the proposed site when they are forced to migrate . up the hill will infest our homes. The construction will produce ahigh- decibel noise from 6:30 AM to 8:00 PM, six days a week for a period of one to two years. The possibility of egress on to Red Hill GC. Drive will create unreasonable traffic congestion. Respectful , Robert Fromer • Q R S T,U,V eJ~ Dale & Bazbaza Price 8066 Calle Cazabe Place • Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 February 28, 2005 The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Attention Mr Brad Muller Reference• Proposed Sycamore Villa Project /Cameo Homes Gentlemen. CITY GF RAi~~GriO ~:~Gnid~GNGA MAR 0l 20D5 ~,F(,,-„ ~ _ ~~ ,~,~~NING Attached is a copy of our original letter to you dated 8/27/04 in which we vehemently objected and opposed the above proposed project. Progress, growth and prosperity seeming to be the city's main priorities - rt appeazs this development is "moving forward". We were told there would be an "emergency exit" directly onto Red Hill Country Club Drive -now we understand this has now been designated as one of the complex's main • entrance and exits. This is not only imnosstb!e - for a rural two-lane road to accommodate what will be approximately 400 vehicles intersecting with an already busy, nosy road - it is dangerous!! (And what other surprises do the builder and the city have iu store for us?) You have received letters of opposition from numerous existing homeowners in the Red Hill azea opposing, complaining and imploring the city to reconsider this project. Does the community have a voice? Is anyone listening??? The City of Rancho Cucamonga is renowned for their stringent building codes and the high standazds that must be met before permits aze issued. How is it possible that something like this is even being considered How can the city compromise everything that has made Rancho Cucamonga so unique? Tlus project will lower existing property values, agitate existing homeowners (and current tax-payers) and destroy the beauty of an historical azea It will be like living in Fontana or San Bernardino -which should make anyone wince. PLEASE - do something to stop this development!! in ely, _ o /+-~Ge~ • Dale and Bazbaza Price Bep. Q, R, S, T, U, V Lo O .. CITY GF RH(dGI~G GUCAMGNGA MAR Ol 2005 ~F~r,.,_r _ r' ANNING Melvin H. Dieterich 8525 Calle Carabe Rancho Cucamonga, CA 71730 February 28, 2005 The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Red Hill area residents recently attended a second Community Meeting held by the promoters of the "Sycamore Villas" Condominium Project. We wish to have our concerns voiced at the Design Review Committee meeting to be held on March 1, 2005. Although the builders have modified plans to somewhat address our concerns, it has done nothing to alleviate the major problems the residents and the city will face if this project is allowed to proceed as currently designed. The Planning Commission has received dozens of letters protesting this project with legitimate concerns and yet we feel our voices have fallen on deaf ears. It hardly seems unreasonable to expect our city officials to have a dialogue with affected residents. The "Sycamore Villas" project calls for 206 units of two and three story buildings on approximately 20 or so acres. Although the density may well be within the requirements for such a project, that doesn't make it right or good for this area. I am on the Board of Directors at the Red Hill Green Condominiums and am well acquainted with problems facing complexes such as this. The promoters stated that studies and their "demographics" have indicated that this project would be geared to attract "young professionals." That may be well and good, but the fact remains that anyone that comes in with money will not be turned away, and that means investors will look at this as an attractive buy for income property. I have been an investor in real estate for over twenty years and I speak from experience. We at Red Hill Green are also faced with this problem within our own complex and it is of great concern to us. The Board cannot dictate to an owner to whom he may sell his property. The proposed price range of the "Sycamore Villas" puts it pretty much at the entry level housing market and that's exactly what the buildings resemble. This will definitely not benefit the property values in the Red Hill area. The promoters have insisted that this is a "high-end" complex and we take serious issue with that. Units start at less than 1000 square feet. The largest unit at the "Sycamore Villas" comes in less than that of the SMALLEST unit at Red Hill Green. These are not condominiums - they are apartments. • • • Q, R, S, T' ~' v ~ \ One swimming pool is proposed for "Sycamore Villas" with 206 units which is, frankly, a joke. Red Hill Green has two swimming pools for only 74 units and I can assure you that two pools is not sufficient. And our residents are made up mostly of retirees - not "young professionals." How could one pool possibly serve 206 units? The number of units proposed with its single point of entry would further add to the congestion on Foothill Boulevard. With 206 units, we belreve that an additional 400 vehicles will be added to that congestion. The promoters dispute that. It's a fact that two and three car families are the norm - not the exception. If your project supposedly caters to "young professionals," then young professional couples have a car each. You cannot have the argument both ways. Additional projects currently under way all along Foothill Boulevard add to the traffic problem. Has any impact study been performed to assess this? The proposed emergency ingress/egress planned for Red Hill Country Club Drive is nothing but a disaster waiting to happen. The street is already an extremely dangerous area. Why would we want to make this situation worse? This "high-end" project shows units with one car garages and remote garages with insufficient additional parking. (EVERYONE at Red Hill Green has a THREE car garage and most have driveways.) The units at • the complex at the southeast corner of Foothill and Baker, "Vintage Townhomes," have one car garages. Talking to residents there, I learned that garages are used mostly for storage and cars are left outside. Parking is grossly inadequate and visitors often have to park outside on public streets. Is not the same problem going to occur at the "Sycamore Villas?" What these issues boil down to is quality of life issues. We don't need additional congestion, noise, declining property values or our safety compromised. The promoters have pretty much managed to gloss over these problems. We feel that the Planning Commission should be more concerned with the quality of life of everyone concerned, not just those of us who live here now, but those who might wish to make Rancho Cucamonga their home. Red Hill has long been a desirable and unique area. We would be much more inclined to accept a project of really high end single family homes. The attendant problems and strain on city services would be considerably reduced with such a project as opposed to the "Sycamore Villas." We urge the Planning Commission to reject the "Sycamore Villas" project outright, or, for now, at least, postpone approval until consideration of this alternative be addressed along with an in depth study of the concerns herein put forth. Thank you. Melvin H. Dieterich Q, R, S, T, U, V (~ 2 FROM DRVIDSON PHONE NO ~.~ a~ ~ aoor~ C;Tv OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIAR O 1 200pSp To Whom tt may concezn; t1ar E2 2005 t.?.03RI• Pl These are our concerns about the proposed 206 untt Condominium Cameo 'tort ies "Sycamore Vrllas" at the NWC of Baker sail Foothill Blvd to Rancho C'ucamc nga_ i Traffic pattern and safety. Access is only across one end of the pro~ec-t.1f t~,~. v,ere a fire on that on the one and only road, whtch connects from Foothill to R ed =Till Gwn1 ry Club RAad-the t~esidents would be trapped! 2 Public sernces for police fire deuartment, mail services, and trash ::ervice< would be increased 3 There wtll be a need for new schools/class room gnaee - children F re alloy v ~i_ ~k they have the right to a decent public school system. 4 Dust during constructtoa (some local people have asthma). 5. Notre lnerease ra consump4on of scarce and/or costly resources such as N:~der„ el~~tncty, an as 7 Strain on sewer system and probable need for more tresunent plant:, All of the above hems affect the quality of life and health! We strongly otge'..'.o tl•t slze and plan of the condominium project Annette Davidson tt Q,Hwiu~ ~ aV~lbb... Richard A Davidson ~ .n ~'. ~ 8077 Cale Carabe Place Rancho Cucamonga ~~ Q, R, S, T, U, V l.P 3 n U March 7, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga Plenning Department P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Mr. Brad Buller Dear Mr Buller, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAR 17 2005 RECEIVED -PLANNING As a Red Hill resident, I am most concerned about the Cameo Homes Development. I attended the February 25'" meeting at the Sycamore Inn, but the discussion there did not satisfactorily address these considerations: Safe The 200+ homes will add traffic that will severely impact our area. The elementary school children in these homes are v~nthm walking distance of Valle Vista School, but there is no safe walking route The only access road from Foothill Boulevard, Red Hill Country Club Drive, is a two lane road, no sidewalks and has two blind curves In fad, all of the roads m our community are two lane, narrow and the only ones with sidewalks are in the Red Hill Greens project and the area lust below Valle Vista School • Traffic: Red Hill is a golf-oriented area and golf carts are legal on many roads The adddion of extra cars, narrow roads, and aRemate dnwng patterns would create adddional hazards Also, ' the traffic impact on Foothill Boulevard is a concern. Camelian~neyard Avenue is a dared route linking the 210 and 10 freeways and San Antonio Community Hospdal is two miles away. We live above the exact area of the development, Vineyard to Baker to Grove, and nightly we observe accidents regwnng police cards, fire trucks and ambulances Flood Control: Cameo Homes proposes to move existing flood drainage serviGng the Red Hill Greens area and remove existing watershed In the wake of recent flood damage in surrounding areas, d seems an imprudent plan that would open the city to lawsuds, should problems occur _ To allow a development of this magndude to continue could be a blueprint for disaster, not just creating safety hazards for the residents of the surrounding area, but also causing a multitude of problems for the new, and often unaware, homebuyers. We urge the Planning Commission to seriously consider our concerns before granting perrnission for this protect as d is currently designed ~~~ G~ ~~ ~'~ Donn and hirley O'Morrow • Q, R, S, T, U, V ~y March 18, 2005 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission ,~ ,N ~ ~ ~ fj'QNU'}'}a%i NM,AR 22p~5 ~~ %~-CTII irn ,~ Subject: Cameo Homes Project -Sycamore Villas ~~G AiWC of Baker & Foothill As owner and occupant of a townhouse at the southeast corner of Baker and Foothill, I wish to express my opposition to subject project My principle objection is the high density of this project, which I understand will accommodate 206 one and two bedroom units in an area of rough terrain I also understand that the buildings housing these units will be two and three stones and that many of the units will have remote uncovered parking accommodations The parking situation m my complex, Vintage Townhomes, is bad enough With insufficient attached covered parking we have the continued problem of space availability for visitors. I feel that the proposed project only increases the problems of insufficient attached parking garages, including the increase m the density of the units I appreciate the nght of a property owner to develop his property but this nght must be balanced by the rights of others to enjoy the use of their properties ~cnthout the traffic and other problems created by high density developments Thank you for your consieration of these comments S~mcerely, Donald M Stevenson 8284 Chappellet Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Q, R, S' T' u' v ~~ L~ C~ r 1 \J CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Crv~c Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA , 9 ] 730 Attn Planning Commission MAR 2 0 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING • • Re Charles Joseph Assoctates Protect Gentlemen, As residents of Red Htll Country Club Green for 31 years, we are concerned about the proposed protect below our property Over the years there have been senous problems with flooding waters running offour property to the slopes below and onto Foothill Boulevard The cumng and removal of any earth m this location wtll cause irreparable damage to the slopes and v~nll surely undermine the foundations of the condo's above, which could cause severe damage not only to the units but nsk mtury or death to the homeowners We strongly hope the City Planning Commission will retect this poorly conceted protect Smce~~~2~~ Burt Court ~_ /~-<'I-l~'~~- ~~c~iJ// Nancy Court 8485 Red Hill Country Club Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA , 91730 Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~ 8so9 Ca~.L.E CRRABE RAtiCAU Ci;CAMoI.Ga~CA `Ii73n ~9a9) ~3i- 0~5.5- RPRf~. N ~ Zoo6 GP • CITY NoFG R I.icHOO CucAMoNGR PPN~~~c~GP~\oN c` OF Rte; PROPaSEA sYoAMoRc ulc-l-Rs ~1FVEl-a~rn~NrpeRo~~'~~PN\NG G GfJT I.E M G IJ RE~~\V~O . P~ AS A HoMtc owNE-2 v~(HcSC PROPERLY ABUrs i'~fE PR6tbS~D pEU~I-oPMEIJT~ I MRUE SEVERRC. MRJOR Co~UC~R~Is ABoU-r -THIS PROJECT WNICH ARc NIGH!-lGHTED rll THE r-ot~c.o'vv ING- PARi~GRHPHS, C-EIJ~RA~. PLRU AMENpMENT ORC Zooy- 00339 pEUI~~.OPMa=NT CODE AMCNDMEIJT DRC zoo4- oo~z. F{o~/ CAN 't"f-fE CI.Y of RAIJCNU CUCRMONGA ~U~IJ S~RIO~.ISI.y CcNS I p ER RI.LoW I~G A N IGf~- qr Ns ITy C zod UNITS oN zi AcRC~S)~ R1UL.TIPLE-STORE/ .pEU~G.aPMENT orJ ~-RND • WNICH cauTAlNs R 3a PERCENT st,apc ? WE NRUE HRD sEUGRAL INSrI~NcF.s aF s~-oP~S GIU~-JG wRY ~~ oUR ow~J pEU~~.OPME~T RpJ(~CEIJT TD THE SUBJECT pRoPCI~TY, THIS PRaJ~cT h{F}S TrIE POTENTfAL FOR QE-STA&il-1z~NG THE WHOLE I'(ILL.SIDE, I AM NOT RT ALL COMFORTED RY THE I~sSURAtJCE.S Y~/E HAUE RECEIUEp T NIT THIS C.RdJD CAIJ 8E DEUEI.OPEp SAFE1-Y, I flM CERTRIAI TNRT pS'Opti~' IN PLACES' 1,IKE 1^RG-U-„A NILiS AND LAUREL, C'RIJYON WNERE i-(IL.~.SIAE piSASTGRS HgUE ocCURRED r~FCEIIJFp TH~,S~ SRME fl•SSUR1INCES WNEti PRoJC--CTS WARE ~UfL--" GIJ S~o~~s wNI~N srroul.D I~lRuE NEU~R -~~~~ pEUEG,OP~~, H~.50~ RUL1or-'F' FRolvi THE 'roP of THE HILL F~oWs iNRL1UGN iHls PR6pCRTY 1N S'6Ur`R~~- PLr9C6S /~1JD TNERE ARE GREAT RccuMU!-ATfo--u' OF WRTaER Rr THE BoTToM of THE SLOPE (~FTGR EuGRY S~R-lq, T'NE A{.RNS i I~IAVE SEEAJ po NoT sEEYVI To RDEGr UATEIy /}pQRESS ~pRRIN/~GE Issur-s, Q, R, S, T, U, V (,p~ M171GATED NECATIUC ,D1=CL~ARATtoti) aF EIJUIROI~IM~A)T'd}L IMPA~Ts HaW CAIJ THE NEO-ATIUE 1MP-~C-T of s~U~R~~ HU~JDRED ~IIIONRI.. iIEHIcI.FS PoRIN~ or~Tn 1=OOTNILL BGuc.E~RRQ EI}Ct-~ l~/~Y P~IaI~V RE /1'11 TIG/~TED ? THE FOUTNILL CoRRIpGIZ IS RL.REAI~Y HEADILY CGN~F,S'TED, H~;D THE PaRTl0~l.1 r3ETWEEJ~J U IIJEVRR D A IJ P GRGJE 15 o1JE OF Tr•1E WOACIST STRETCHES, THE ROAAWAY Uu(JER THE RAILROAf7 OUERPI~S' is ~AREL~/ ~{ L/~lJES WIDE ~ WITH NO SHOULpFF?S) (~tiiQ THE UrvCONTROLr.EO INTER.SEC'TIOIJ RT FoaTN1L.L Au0 h?Ep HIL.I. COUIJTRI( CLU$ pRil3E C~CEiJE OF ~'IANY (+CCIpF-~is) Is FXT REMEI~y NAZARpOUS, `1H15 pFUELOpMEDJT WILL O1JI..Y I11RKE MI}TT~'RS tNORS~. IT SNOUT-D RL.SG $E IJOTEfJ TMAT tiARRON/~ WlNA11JG R~0 111 LL COUIJ'1'RY CLUB pRIUE WILL !}ISO .BF 1~1EAUILy IN]pACTEp, ~TFtF SPFCiFIC PR081-EY11S r Nl}UE i'l1EUTIGIJEQ (~13dUE~ COUPI-ED WITH THE AIR AIJp NOISE f oLLC7Tl01J CRE/}T~D (3y TN IS I~ I GH - AElJS I T Y .p EUEt_OPMrc'IJT~ WILL GRE/~TI-~/ ~EGRA~DE THE QUALITY of i~IF'E FaR TNO.SE DF US L.IUI~UG THE SURROUNPII~lG AREA. URGE THE PL~AIJNINC CaMMtsslorJ TG ~OF'N THE REQUC~STED GENERAL PLRIJ ~~D OEUEI-O PMEU7' cDAfi f~MElJ0Y11EWTS~ /~S WELL A5 THE NEGRTIUE AI:CLl9(~RT10W5~ ~UEC~SS'ARY TO ALLOW TNIS PRO~EI~ IJEUEL,OPMI~'IJT TO MOUE FDt?WHRA, TI-1ArJK YOU FOR YOUR TIME RIJD ATTENTIGN , S I NCERE~.Y I ~~~~ H~uRY ~., "NIiuK" STOy C,p; MAYOR BILL ALEXANDER MAYOR PRO TEM OIAIJE WILLIArvIs Co~uCllrrnl=Ml3ER REX G-Ui IERRE~ • CouuclLnIEMBER a7ENfJ15 M rCNAEL COUNcILn~6MB~R sAM SQAC3-iJO~D Q, R, S, T, U, V COg Charles Joseuh Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Cameo Homes Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Meeting Date August 10w, 2004 6pm to 8pm 1 Presentation Included the project elevations, color landscape plan with proposed upgrade to parking lot entrance in front of Sycamore Inn that well provide access to the property 2 Presentation of hillside ordinance and request for variance as to hIIlslde cuts Concerns raised that this would not hold and should not be allowed. Client explained that this portion of property had been adversely eroded by the years of neglect and poor drainage from the Red HIII Condos It was discussed that the property owners have the right to develop the land and fix the erosion from the properties to the north. 3 Concerns about traffic created along Red HIII Country Club; client response was to create this secondary point of access as emergency purposes only 4 Questions were raised about the mass of buildings along foothill and the property and blocking of views, concerns about trees blocking the views Presentation of cross sections were provided and discussed that showed buildings were not being blocked Client offered to prepare photo exhibits for another neighborhood meeting and to look at adjusting the screening of the buildings along Foothill. 5 Questions regarding interaction between homeowners on the north property line as It relates to types of trees blocking view. Landscape architect Informed the neighbors that smaller trees that do not grow that high would be installed and view preservation was primary component with tree selection. 6 Conversations regarding view preservations and a house sales and anticipated sales. Response was that cannot anticipate selling price but informed that new product Is comparable sales at a per square foot basis. 7 Concerns about existing traffic on the Red HIII country club road realignment Neighbors were informed that this would be a Clty Project that Is not part of the Cameo project scope Concerns about homeless people on site Client response was that they would follow up with police action to remove the trespassers. Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 Ctry Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Sutte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 T A CALIHORNIA CORPORATION l~lT U ~ ~~ Q, R, S, T, U, • -8 Concerns about the existing trees, vegetation and integnty of the hdl Client response was that they would be looking at removing some of the bwldings at the North west end of the project and preserving more trees • • (~, R, S, T, U, V -1 O I;:harles Joseph Associates -` PUBIIClPRn/ATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES . P,ugusf 2, 2~)C4 Rr /1~g~st 3'", 2004 Communrty Meeting r;ameo Homes Proied located a, the tJWC of Baker and Foothill Blvd , in Rancho Cucamonga Dear Propery Owner ThIS IeJter is tc invr:e you to a Commurnty Meeting concemrng the Cameo Homes "Syc~ mom 4illas' a 211 Und Condominwm prated located at the NWC of Baker and Foottdl Blvd , in Rancho Cucamonga. This rr.eet~rg ~nnll give us the opportunity to share wRh you our plans for this high quality Condonarnun development project that we believe uvdl be a posihve addition to your neighbciitoorl, and cue opportunity to discuss the specifics of this project and to answer any questions that you may have with regard to this proled. Alt proposed condominium Iluildings Have been designed to preserve exrshng Red Hill views 1Ne app~ec Iate• you :along time out of your busy schedule to join us on Tuesday, August °Otn, 2704 at fi 00 F M. The meeting +nnll be held at The Sycamore Inn, lopted at 8318 . f"oothill 31vo., =:ancno Cucamonga The meeting will be held downstairs, rn the Grove Room and the: project team will be available to answer any questions or wncems that you may have at thu meeting. LagM refreshments will be served. VVe are loo nn: forward to meeting with you. Should you have any questions or need any additior al info rmatior, In advance of this meeting, please feel free to give me a call at your earlle:t cplwrtt. Wiry Sincert: ~~•, r--~~ ~~,e_~ C.iavies .,. Eluc uet C iariz3 Joseph Asstxiates nalosure cc tarry -tend>rson City Planning z d Or3ce 909.481•]822 888.240.1822 Faz 909.481.1824 • C.q ~Cr.rcr + 10681 Footru8 Blvd, Sum 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 9]730 A CAI~NORNIA CORPORATION Q,R,g T,U,V1 .ZEti TEtb 6 aanbng slony~ d6b~Z0 40 ZO 9ny ~~ •_;> ~;a :o E E,I~t; r..> }$ 8 Co t'i p G~ ~ ~~ ~ t~. u ~~ ~y ~ YYAy 1r\` ~: ~; H . ~ tr ' ,,; t) C~ t ~; iy ~~ " C~1 I Iti ~~ It. Hi C' ~ V A ~ ^j / ' _ ~> ~ i hi ] i k7 '~ fi ti i . l+1 } -~ /h 1b r .i l \/ t1 ~~ M+ t1 G~ ~+ ;D' 7-j ~~ a ,., F, 7 ~ c' z; ~1 ~ tj 1 ^' i n <n c> ~n ~• ii {1 Y:y` 7'~i ~i` ~~ 1 1 .. F- U ~: ,~ ~; a ~' i .L• Z L. n `n `1 `s '~ `~ ~.: g d .~'E~~8b 6 Zan6nH ~ 4~ n • d6b~Z0 b0 ZO ~~H ~i'-0" MAX_ HT_ Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Cameo Homes Neighborhood Meeting Minutes • Meeting Date: February 24, 2005 530 pm to 7pm Presentation of the revised project elevations, color landscape plan with proposed upgrade to parking lot entrance in front of Sycamore Inn that will provide access to the property. Client informed neighbors that the Foothill Elevations were reduced to 2 story elements from feedback by City staff and turned sideways 2. Concerns were raised about the lack of amenities, and neighbors were informed since our last meeting additional amenities, including a tot lot per Clty requirements Concerns raised about tot lot and not wanting residents to have children. Client explained this was not legal to exclude children and a tot lot is required for multifamily development with the only exception being senior housing. 3 Presentation of hillside ordinance and request for general plan amendment as to hillside cuts Client explained that this portion of property had been adversely eroded by the years of neglect and poor drainage from the Red HIII Condos and the previous variance determination. The proposed development will improve the poor • drainage at the sites. 4 Concerns about traffic created along Red HIII Country Club for student trip generation, client response was to this secondary point of access as emergency purposes only and a study was prepared to demonstrate student traffic along Red HIII. 5 Presentation of cross sections and preservation of existing views being preserved. 6 Questions regarding interaction between homeowners on the north property line as it relates to types of trees blocking view Landscape architect informed the neighbors that smaller trees that do not grow that high would be installed and view preservation was pnmary component with tree selection 7. Conversations regarding home sales and anticipated sales. Response was that cannot anticipate selling price but informed that new product is comparable sales at a per square foot basis. Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 i Ctty Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Swte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Q, R, S, T,U,V 73 8 Concerns about existing traffic on the Red Hill country club road realignment Neighbors were informed that this would be a City Project that is not part of the Cameo project scope. Concerns about homeless people on site. Client response was that they have been arresting and prosecuting these offenders, and that if the development is approved this would not be an issue i Q, R, S, T,U,V~y Cclr~'1E;0 .-{orrtss 2/24!05 Community Meeting Sign In Sheet Address Phone # _N_t~tme__ /. ~~ f '~ a4z¢~ti ~)c: .~ ~•~~ ; ° ~ ~ti~w~-mss 859 Ca ! ~a~eab~ ~ _ •~ ~.., La.~~a •ac+.v;tc'0. E353S 1~G-o 11.~~.. GL -~'~-. 1 ` -'_`-- iCD d- I,fIA,CD R~dl:'n2 S . 1 3 ~ / O Bg~ (~1../L Z iR /E iL G ~ '~ - ;~j,NN3e~..~ltil,~iY2/+J ~ '~ fIb ~Z Ck _ ~n~t ~ ~ ~ne~ x' ~ fir.. -_~~- ~2.~~ Gha~P~11R ~l. ~Z.~ C z ~b ~ C~" -~ v-~,~3o'~I z3 ~~!.~1?/f~%~ Ji~sT6,pi &s~.sC"r~-ti Cs ~ /r ~~ ~ ~5 ~( seer za ~ ~~~c_S~_- ~5 i Q, R, S ~ T' ~' v 50/L0 39dc1 Hd350f 53121tIH~ 4Z8IL0D6 9L~D0 S00L/8Z/Z0 n U Q, R, S, T' U' U ~ t` 50/E0 c9Cd Hd350C 53'RidFiO 4ZBLZ846 91~D0 500Z/8Z/Z0 C~ C~ C Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 1 50/b0 ~9d~i Hd350C S3~2iGH~ ~~o.IBb6 9T~b0 500Z/BZ/Z0 Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIGPRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES C~ Sycamore Inn MDR Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Meeting Date. January 19th, 2006, 5pm to 7pm Presentation Included the revised parking lot layout and traffic signal relocation. This was the primary goal of this meeting. We provided confirmation that the Red HIII Country Club rear access well be for emergency purposes only and that the Sycamore Inn access and business operations well not be adversely effected by the shared driveway approach r• U 2 Questions were raised regarding the types of trees to be removed and Installed on the site; there will be over 300 trees for the MDR application and nearly 900 (actual 1100) trees for the condo project. Several questions as to the types of trees and size of trees and landscape architect addressed landscape Issues 3 Questions regarding Interaction between homeowners on the north property Ilne as It relates to types of trees blocking view Landscape architect informed the neighbors that smaller trees that do not grow that high would be installed and view preservation was primary component with tree selection. 4 Conversations regarding view preservations and a house sales and anticipated sales The subtect of this meeting was to discuss the Sycamore Inn parking lot, but we cannot anticipate selling price but informed that new product is comparable sales at a per square foot basis. 5 Concerns about existing traffic on the Red HIII country club road realignment Neighbors were reminded that this would be a City Protect that is not part of the cameo protect scope. Concerns about homeless people on site and peeping toms Informed neighbors that the police have been actively arresting the homeless people and that when development occurs this will no longer be an issue. Comments from homeowners wanting to know when the protect was going to be approved and construction timelines. Timelines regarding plan check and construction discussed and offer extended to homeowners to participate In communication with the City for support for the protect. • Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.48U1824 Gty Centet • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Swte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORA 170N Q, R, S, T, U, V '-~ Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Cameo Homes Neighbdrhp~od Meeting Minutes Meeting Date. January ~, 2006, 5pm to 7pm 1. Presentation included the revised parking lot layout and traffic signal relocation Confirmation that the Red Hill Country Club rear access will be for emergency purposes only. 2. Questions were raised regarding the types of trees to be removed and installed on the site; there will be over 300 trees for the MDR application and nearly 900 (actual 1100) trees for the condo project. Several questions as to the types of trees and size of trees and landscape architect addressed landscape issues 3. Questions regarding interaction between homeowners on the north property line as it relates to types of trees blocking view. Landscape architect informed the neighbors that smaller trees that do not grow that high would be installed and view preservation was primary component with tree selection. u 4 Conversations regarding view preservations and a house sales and anticipated sales. We cannot anticipate selling price but informed that . new product is comparable sales at a per square foot basis. 5. Concems about existing traffic on the Red Hill country club road realignment. Neighbors were reminded that this would be a City Project that is not part of the cameo project scope. Concerns about homeless people on site and peeping toms. Informed neighbors that the police have been actively arresting the homeless people and that when development occurs this will no longer be an issue. 6. Comments from homeowners wanting to know when the project was going to be approved and construction timelines. Timelines regarding plan check and construction discussed and offer extended to homeowners to participate in communication with the City for support for the project. Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fax 909.481.1824 • Gty Curter • 10681 Foothill Bivd , Swte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORA770gN Q, R, S, T, U, V 1 I 01/31/2006 00.51 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 02/ea U Cameo Homes 1/19/2006 Commurnty Meeting Name Address Phone # ' ~ri~, ~ ~~ - ~- 'csL~' ~n~L ~ <~2 2 ~ .r q 3 C,,r-,1~,(~.~ti ,~t~Ik~~.r,.~n.e ~53s f~,! I~-I II C;~,~,~k,Z. CL6 dt 4 1, E N l: ~ ~ 1-4 11 11 I~ !/ 5 8 r n n ~/ 7 eCt,J-> ~JC ~'~~ 1,1,E ' -~~r 8 , a _ //il/G: i~ /~ L~tc=.t4-~ x'93 ~ lr,"LGL' l ~ , ^G S 10 , ~- 11 ~i7- x7yo ~ ~ ~~ D 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 Q, R, S, T, U, V 01/31/2006 00 51 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PA6t ediea Cameo Homes 1/19/2006 Community Meeting Name Address Phone # 1 ~ ~ ~~/ L+r. 7 ~. Ui3G'' -~ r. ~y 2 ~~iw:..~~--~i~/1 ~ / + L6r.Cly :/Z._ r~ 9,Ji C9 ^ __ 3 s ~M C/ Qes~"['A~cce a9~P.9~8~d'r O ~~G9Y~10~/Crl4- 7 t(LaiR ~~1' • - ~ ~ J,~c,~ r ~,4 / ~. ~ac~- a3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 t i r C Q, R, S, T,U,V U' 01/31/2006 00.51 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 04/04 • • • Cameo Homes 1/19/2006 Community Meeting Name Address Phone # 1 ~o ur 83 ~?3 00 ~v„( 9BI-`1~Z2- 2 1 ~ 6 ~ 'I ~ zoo 3 ~ ~ ~j jQ_d~ a s 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 20 21 Z2 23 24 Q, R, S, T,U,V ~Z Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANF GEMENT SERVICES January 6th, 2006 Re Community Meeting Cameo Homes Protect located at the NWC of Baker and Foothill Dear Property Owner CIiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA• JAN 0 9 2006 ~FCFh%~~? -PLANNING Blvd , In Rancho Cucamonga This letter Is to Invite you to a Community Meeting concerning the Cameo Homes "Sycamore Villas" a 206 Unit Condominium protect located at the NWC of Baker and Foothill Blvd , In Rancho Cucamonga This meeting will give us the opportunity to share with you our plan revisions for this high quality Condominium Development protect that we believe will be a positive addition to your neighborhood, and the opportunity to discuss the specifics of this protect and to answer any questions that you may have with regard to this protect All proposed condominwm buildings have been designed to preserve existing Red HIII views We appreciate you taking time out of your busy schedule to loin us at 5 00 PM on January 19th, 2006 The meeting lvlll be held at The Sycamore Inn, located at 8318 Foothill Blvd ,Rancho Cucamonga The meeting well be held downstairs, in the Grove • Room and the protect team well be available to answer any questions or concerns that you may have at this meeting Light refreshments well be served We are looking forward to meeting with you Should yoL~ have any questions or need any additional Information In advance of this meeting, please feel free to give me a call at your earliest opportunity Smcerely, C Charles J Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Enclosure cc Larry Henderson, City Planning cc Dan Coleman, Clty Planner Ofti~c 911n..1Sl•18''_ 88fi•2~0•IS2^ Fay 909.481.1823 • ran (inr~r ~ U1GS1 Foothill Bh d bwre i93 ~ R unho Cucamonga, CA ~ 91730 \~ \I II URII\l (11:P(1R \11O\ Q, R, S, T,U,V ~3 ~~~. _ ~ ~_=i ,_~ ,I - ~: ._._:~.. __ te=e" ; .. _ ~ % • \ .9r- r4~ ~, - i ~%`n=~~~-.G;1sxe`u ; ~_ ~_ .~~ ~ ;`T`F~~~~t'\ ~^~ _-{1~1~{~~~_r~... ,„.ter _~ . S~"~ .,! r -__.__ ~'yx1,s. "~ l'] .., s '^'µsi ~. '-ii~.~ y;,, ~ ;qtr,' - - _ _~ h ., may./~ i / ~",. _~ E ''Y'S"~? ~-.+_/ f ~, l fop' ~ ~, __ ~ ~ '~ Vii. ~"R F ~' ~ f wF-~ J ~, _,I ,~ ~ _ ;, ~~ _ \ i; ^-~% / 1~, :%.£p_. I _~_ .~l ~}^~ ca x`51'`= ~)~5~\ , \//: - n_ ~ - ~"','~F, =1, l~-i=r.~~il °`,i \~ 'iii '~,'c,t'_- __ ,~ ~, yam` ` ~"'"~' `J ~ "~----~ "~ =~ ', C ''~ G ~// Z • I i ~, U I i NNi- ~w~_ > a_' E's a L,V::e >N.°. <N ~~_ OQ. O u~~~ C ~< z raj r/ r-~ ~ r \~ L ~..J L Q, R, S, T,U,V S4 Charles ose h Associates pFgA"`'HpC~~ JPUBLIC/PRI~ SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Q qPR ~s 9~pN~,,~ Neighborhood Letter Summary ,1FCF/OFD, p` ?O~s We have compiled responses to the Issues raised by the neighbors dunng the 9NN//~/~, Neighborhood meeting and letters received by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which was then in tum provided to us Below is a summary of each letter and discussion of dems addressed. Copies of these letters are in the staff report. Ken and Helen Brown Mr and Mrs Brown are concerned about the following issues regarding the proposed Sycamore Villas Protect: noise levels, view changes, and traffic Response: View impacts been mitigated by lowering the profile of the building, a photo survey was conducted to demonstrate the ultimate Roof Condition south of the property. The traffic issues raised in this letter have been addressed by the traffic study that will not create adverse impacts for traveling to the elementary school as there will be a low student trip generation. Noise -already present from Farm, more from Recreation/Pool-Complaints about what was verbally described dunng the neighborhood meeting as "migrant music" coming from the strawbeny patch farm workers Response; We can not control the noise levels generated from the workers at the strawberry patch as it is not subject to the application. We can not control the type of music desired by the residents of a project The complaints are coming from a property that is approximately a '/+ mile, or 1200 linear feet from the subject property. Emergency entrance/exd hazardous. The northerly exit is for Fire Ingress/Egress only and has been designed as such. There's a perception of developers greed. The developer will be responsible for paying over 4 million dollars in associated "impact fee" costs to the community. This fee was something that was not required for the existing condo project to the north. Annette and Richard Davidson Project's one access would be hazardous in case of emergency, i.e. fire. The northerly exit is for Fire Ingress/Egress only and has been designed as such. Public services would be increased The developer will be responsible for paying over 4 million dollars in associated "impact fee" costs to the Office 909.487.1822 800.240.1822 Fas 909.481.1824 Crty Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd , Swte 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ~~I~~ ~ P Q, R, S, T. U, V ~s community. This fee was something that was not required for the existing condo project to the north. The project will be paying to mitigate future services with an estimate of approximately $ 753,548 for Traffic, $721,000 for park fees, $1,772,218 for school fees, $361,000 for storm drain fees and construction of master planned stone drain improvements that will benefit the existing condo project, $1,669,218 for water fees. All fees totaling an estimate of 3 681 984 dollars in impact fees as well as over a million dollars in street improvements as currently conditioned. New schools and classroom needed See relative to school fees. Construction dust will affect local people with asthma Project will comply with necessary air quality management during construction for dust control. Noise Project will comply with noise standards and have an HOA in place for control of noise standards on site; same as the condo to the north. Increase m consumption of scarce and/or costly resources, ie Water, electncity and gas. Project will be paying almost 2 million dollars in water fees, which is something that was not paid for by the Condo's to the north. Strain on sewer system See above response, project will be paying millions of dollars in infrastructure fees, something the condo project to the north was not required to do. In fact, Red hill condos existing drainage creates more of a safety hazard on the area than the proposed project because of the lack of stone drain improvements and drainage that was allowed to sheet flow from the existing condo project, which as part of this • development will be fixed beyond the property line. Dale and Barbara Price Traffic problems on Red Hdl and Foothill, The northerly exit is for Fire Ingress/Egress only and has been designed as such. Traffic increases have been anticipated as part of the General Plan and appropriate street widening plans have been approved and are moving forward to accommodate all growth of Rancho Cucamonga along this corridor. Potential storm drainage problems, land slides and fire hazards Insuffiaent parking/garages The project site will be over parked and includes 82 extra tandem spaces as part of the overall approval and are in addition to City required parking. The parking will not affect the property to the north. Unbearable upward traveling noise from Pool/Rec Room. As part of the CCBR's noise levels will need to be controlled by the property management which have more control than say a single family development Devaluation of surrounding area and rural quality of area Brand new development tends to increase the price per square foot, the price per square foot for the proposed development is higher than the existing condos. Q, R, S, T,U,V 8~ Overcrowding of existing schools This 2 bedroom type product does not generate high numbers of students and nationally have been negligible, however the developer will be contributing $1,772,218 for school fees. Charles and Lvnda Teenor Entry point into site wdl create traffic problems. The traffic signal entrance has been designed to meet all applicable City Traffic Engineering requirements. This particular resident lives approximately 1 mile from the project development, near the Vineyard traffic signal. Melvin Dietench Please note that Mr. & Mrs. Dieterich have sold their condo and moved. Devaluation of surrounding area due to the fact that protect buildings resemble an entry level housing market and not a high end complex Brand new development tends to increase the price per square foot; the price per square foot for the proposed development is higher than the existing • condos. Traffic/congestion problems escalated by single entry into protect site. Since Mel reviewed the plans, the traffic signal entrance has been revised as outlined above, and project will also be paying City Transportation fees. Insufficient parking The project site will be over parked and includes 82 extra tandem spaces as part of the overall approval. The parking will not effect the property to the north. One pool insufficient The project will have other amenities provided such as a clubhouse, pocket park and tot lot and not just 2 pools similar to what was provided for the condo project Dale and Barbara Pnce Emergency exd, designated as a main entrance and exit, is impossible, noisy, and dangerous The northerly exit is for Fire Ingress/Egress only and has been designed as such and will not be dangerous since residents will not use that ingress/egress. Q, R, s, r, u, v g ~~ • Devaluation of property values, agitation of homeowners and destruction of historical area Brand new development tends to increase the p-~ce per square foot; the price per square foot for the proposed development is higher than the existing condos. Rancho Cucamonga will become into Fontana We are not sure how to respond to this comment Burt and Nancv Court Our fine spoke at Great length with Mrs. Court regarding the development Friday March 31~. The same issues raised were conveyed regarding the responses with an additional response to the drainage issues. The decay of the soil for the existing condos can not be mitigated by our developmenty we will provide for an appropriate drainage acceptance of the condo project The existing drainage problems of the condos is not for our client to solve. The condos could decide to generate funds to address the storm drain issues, and we are happy to provide copies of the drainage study to an engineer to evaluate the existing drainage flows. High density will reduce property values • Insufficient parking/garages Health hazard as result of insufficient swimming pools Entry-level housing unRs will become ghetto. Dirt movement will cause damage to existing homes Increased traffic along Foothill Emergency entry/exit dangerous Degrades city Earth removal will cause damage to slopes and undermine the foundation of the condo's above Sever damage will be caused to units and lead to injury or death of homeowners. Robert Fromer Our firm spoke at Great length with Mr. Fromer regarding the development Friday March 31~. It appeared his primary concern was noise and he mentioned that he could not hear the construction noise for the Red Hill Country Club construction, and therefore would not likely hear the noise from the Cameo project during construction. Hillside stability will need to be addressed by the Civil Engineer of record, but we were told that the buildings and proposed development would actually serve to help hold the hillside intact and property accept and control drainage/run off from the existing condo project Devaluation of surrounding property • Hillside instability will be created by grading Rodents will migrate to surrounding homes Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ g Noise issue • Traffic congestion as result of exit onto Red Hdl Thank you for the opportunity to provide responses to the letters on file at the City Sincerely, Charles Buquet Charles Joseph Associates C~ • Q R, S, T, U, V g~ n yM'~ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM st a (Part I -Initial Study) ary orRandro Cucamonga (Please type or punt Beady using ink Use the tab key to move from one bne to the next IrrreJ Poannmq Omsron (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuantto City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. • r 1 L_J Applrcahon Number for the pro/ect to which this form pedams DRC 2003-00637 Pro/ect Tdle S camore Villas Name 8 Address of pm/ect owner(s) Nicholas Coussoulis IRA No 61133912, McKay Group I, LLC Name 8 Addn;ss o/ developer or pro/ect sponsor Kim Berry, Cameo Homes -1105 Quad Street Newport Beach, CA 92660-2705 Contact Person 8 Address Chuck Buquet - Charles Joseph Associates, 16081 Foothill Bivd Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name 8 Address o/person prepanng this form (rf ddferent from above) Chuck Buquet - Charles Joseph Assocates, 16081 Foothill Blvd Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number E v mentalCam Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ (~ Created on 5!22/2003 12 03 PM INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note mar rl rs me responsmnny v. r,rr; ar,Nn,.a... •~ ~••~••~•~ ~ •-•~ the apphcahon rs complete at the bins of submittal, Crty staff will not be available to perform work required to provide mrssrng rnformahon ~J '1) Provide a full scale (8-1l1 x 11) cropy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whtch includes the protect sde, and mdtcate the sde boundanes 2) Provide asst o/color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west, views into and from the sde from the pnmary access points that serve the sde, and representative views of srgnfia3nt features from the sde InGude a map showing loar6on o/each photograph 3) Protect Location (descnbe) protect Is located north of Foothlll noRh & east of Sycamore Inn _ west of the Railroad overpass on Foothlll The northern boundary Is rust south of the Red HIII condommlum ro ect 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach addfional sheet d necessary) 0207-101-34-0-000,0207-101-31 '5) Gross Sde Area (arJsq ft) 21 00 '6) Net Sde Area (total sde srze minus area of pu6ltc streets & proposed 19 75 ded~arbons) 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/ect sde (attach additional sheet d necessary) None 8) Include a descnphon of all permds which will be necessary fmm the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes in order to fully implement the protect Gradm & Bwidm rmlts 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the sde as d exists before the pm/ect rndudmg mformabon on topography, sod stability, plants and ammals, mature bees, bads and roads, drainage courses, and samc aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (including age and condthon) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of stgnrficant features descnbed In addition, ate all sources of information (t e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheolog~cal surveys, traffic studies) Site Is sloped North from Foothlll with vanous plants and trees There Is an abandoned water basin on the east portion of the site adtacent to the "ralis on trails" proposed by the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga • EnvvonmentalCameo Page 2 of 9 Created on 5/22/2003 12 03 PM Q, R, S, T, U, V q' Information rndtcated by an astensk (`) rs not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise 2quested by staff i 10) Describe the known cultural and/or hrstoncal aspects of the srte Crte a0 sources of mlormabon (books, pubbshed repoRs and oral history) Protect site is north of Route 66 and nearby City Landmark Sycamore Inn dabng back as a Stagecoach Trading Depot during agricultural development of Rancho Cucamonga ' 11) Describe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (arroraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Foothill Blvd (Route 66) traffic voice that Hall be addressed m accordance to cily specficabons 12) Describe [he proposed protect rn detail Thrs should prowde an adequate descnptron of the srte m terms of ultrmate use that will result from the proposed protect Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the antrclpated completion of each rncrnment Attach additional sheet(s) rf necessary The protect is 225 attached for-sale residential umt community designed for a hillside site Because of its h~ghty visible location the protect intends to be a "gateway" mto Rancho Cucamonga It ubl¢es spld level bwldmgs of townhomes and stacked flat product type in an effort to mitigate the hillside terrain It Hell have a variety of 2 bedroom plans with the matonty of the units hawng an mdiwdual garage m the same bwdimg A few remote garage structures will be to Gose proximity to the unds as well as uncovered • parkmg spaces located among lush landscapmg Because of its close proximity to the Sycamore Inn, the protect Env~ronmentalCameo Page 3 of 9 Created on 5122/2003 12 03 PM Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~ well share the same entry as well as similar craftsman style of architecture to compliment the existing structure Amenities such as a pool spa fitness room among others, will cater to the residents A system of landscaped walking paths traverse through the sde and will connect to the future City Rails to _ 13) Descnbe the surmundrng properties, rncludrng information on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indreate the type of land use (residential, commemial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) North of the sde Is the Red Hill Condo Community & County club East is a future site of community trail East of the trail crossing Is a vacant property zoned Multi Family South of the sde Is Foothill Blvd , with resturants on the south side of Blvd West of the site Is vacant property and the Sycamore Inn 14) Wll the proposed protect change the pattem, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the pro/ect~ The proposed pro/act vrnll not change the pattem scale or character of the area The proposed protect Is _ generally consistent with the spirt and Intent of the Sycamore Inn specific plan 15) Indreate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, incuding source and amount How xnll these norse levels affect ad/scent pmpert~es and on-site uses What methods ofsoundproofing ere proposed Short term construction norse only no long term Impacts Residential protect will comply with applicable CI noise standards '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenrc trees Any tree removal determined as necessary dunng Clty review/approval process vinll be subtect to CI tree removal ermit re uirements 17) Indicate any bodies of water (rncludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams None EnvironmentalCameo Page 4 of 9 Created on 522/2003 12 03 PM Q, R, S, T,U,V ~3 18) Indreate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficatron, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gaUday) 87.600 00 Peak use (gaUday) 175.200 00 b CommeroraUlnd (gaUday/ac) 0 00 Peak use (gaUmrNac) 0 00 19) Indreate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Sephc Tank ®Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolahon tests 1/discharge to a sandary sewage system rs proposed indrrate expelled daily sewage generebon (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For /urther danbcahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal (gal/day) 43.800 00 b Commeroral/Industnal (gal/day/ac) 0 00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units 225 Detached (md~cate range o(parcel sizes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot size N/A Attached (militate whether units are rental or /or sale units) • For sale units, see below 21) Anhppated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $230.000 00 to $275.000 00 Rent (per month) $0 00 to $0 00 22) Specr/y number of bedrooms by unit type Bulldmg Type 1 1 116 sq ft total of 119 units Building Type 2 1 143 sq ft total of 21 units Bulldmq Type 3 1 231 sq ft total of 86 units 23) Indicate anhppated household srze by unit type Afl 2 bedroom units 2 6 • EnwronmentalCameo Page 5 of 9 Created on 5222003 12 03 PM Q, R, S, T,U,V gy 24) Indicate the expected numberofschool children who will be msrdmg w~thm the pm/ect Contact the appropnate School Dtstnds as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary 37 b Junior High 15 c Senior High 53 COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or (unctton(s) o/ commercial, mdustnal or inshtutronal uses N(q 26) Total boor area of commen:ral, mdustnal, or mshtutional uses by type N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation N/A 28) Numbero/employees Total 0 • Mawmum Shift _ Time of Maximum Shift 29) Pmwde breakdown o/ anbc~pated/ob class~ficahons, including wage and salary ranges, as welt as an rndicabon of the rate of hire for each c/assficahon (attach additional sheet d necessary) 30) Esbmabon of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside rn fhe ~' 0 '31) For commen;tal and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o(atr pollution em~ssons (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Atr Quality Management Dtstnct, at (818) 572-6283) • EnwronmentalCameo Page 6 of 9 Cn:ated on 5222003 12 03 PM Q, R, S, T, U, V q S ALL PROJECTS C~ • 32) Have the water, sewer, bre, and flood control agencies serving the protect been contacted to detennme then ability to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ If so, please indicate their response All agenaes have indicated their ability to prowde adequate service to the pro~ect site 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals Examples of hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's, rad~oachve substances, peshades and herbiades, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, rl known None 34) X11 the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limned to those examples listed above 1/yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans No I hereby cerb/y that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation ofthis pm/ect to the best of my abilAy, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ 1 further understand that additional information may be roquired to be submitted beloro an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date 1/28/04 Signature Tale Chuck Buquet President Charles Joseph Associates EnwronmentalCameo Paae 7 M C Q, R, S, T, U, V q (p Created on 522/2003 12 03 PM iq __-_ ~~ '~ - _ _ ~+ N5 ~ r :# -a , .~ ~ ,~ -~ ^~ a,'. ~ ~~,. f'';~,,.~ .. , t.~ _~. _~ _ .,._ (. _1 ~..' 727 i ;Trarf®r ~' - .r i .. - 1~,-j - y s ~ -° _ ~... 0. ~ .a~L.,_... ....,ni J 4y~,: ~v 1,, ~ ., '' .- ti~ rr,' `~ iC/-. - -- ' i~ v ---; '" ' !.. ~ , ~ , ~ ,tU A, i ~"• ' )3 1 e • ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~^, ~ ~ J ~' ~I r F ~ ~ 1~ ~', +.• ~ ~ - _ ,~w = ' _ jy~iw w - ~1~: :~ V9lR!~ ! y: i Wrl~ _ =~ ~;~~{~-~ ter, >.~~.; ,r _~II . ~~~ Yi t i~ ~ °k`" _ ~Sci:r - - , .. trl~ , *~, } v ,,~1 ~1'~_'~' i ; °_ +p• ~; 5 ~ ~~_w.iw.~ I', ~, i • • .e '~ ' ' °~ w _ v~ w w _ {i _- _ -~ -FGQ.TMiL J •y~ ~~ ' T rftr~L ~~~ . ~~~' . ,. ~- ~' ~ ~ _~. _ ~I~ - w 3.r y,,n~~».~ ~ may. -r. i~+Y.+a Iw _ L' . • r•.•.~ t' ~~4 =,,,, r~`~ . ,yam ~i ~ ;. w ~t n _ .r ~~r`. s 4 ~MM a~~e' w ~~ U 1 ,,. J w ~'1° `?"~~'l E rC~ir_s rr~~l wr~~n+~~n JWY 2003 place ~ Site Viclnlty Charles JosephAssoaates . Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Protect Fde. General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 2 Related Files Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 3 Description of Pro~ect• ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00339 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An application to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope within a mixed use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Paafic Road Right-of-Way -APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related Files Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentatrve Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2004-00352 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An application to amend the Development Code to allow the development of the land that contains a 30 percent slope within amixed-use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way -APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review • DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES- A residential subdivision of 8 lots for condominwm purposes on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way -APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related Files Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2003-00637, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, DRC2005-01061, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominiums on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Corridor area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way -APN 0207-101-13, 31 and 34 Related Files General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Minor Development Review, DRC2004-00826, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 VARIANCE DRC2005-01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant on property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard at the intersection of San Bernardino Road -APN 0207-101-24 Related File Development Review DRC2003-00637, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -Parking • lot, loading area modifications and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant, located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard -APN 0207-101-24 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~j City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 4 Protect Sponsor's Name and Address. • Charles Joseph Assoaates 16081 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation. Mixed Use 6 Zoning Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 1) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Paafic Rail Road right-of-way Properties to the north are developed with condominwms and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commercial uses East of the site is the abandoned Southern Pacific Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed-Use land use and OfficelCommercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the project site adjacent to the Medum Density residential development Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner • (909)477-2750 10 Other agenaes whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report. CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less-than-significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages • Q, R, S, T, U, V 9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 r1 LJ (/) Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils () Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality () Land Use & Planning () Mineral Resources (/) Noise () Population 8 Housing (/) Public Services () Recreation (/) Transportation(Traffic () Utilities & Service Systems (/) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets • An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required Prepared By • Reviewed By Date 2 ~ Date Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ DD City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Sgmfipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Polenlially $~gmfipnl WM1h MNgaLw Than Sgmfiranl No I d Into tee I tl I ad EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not U O O (~) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (~) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (~) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area • Comments• a/b) There are significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site However, the site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 It is the City's desire to have permanent locations within the City where scenic vistas of the foothills, in particular, can be leisurely entoyed Turnouts at the northern terminus of certain roadways (Haven, Archibald, Milliken, Etiwanda Avenues, as well as the Day Creek Channel) provide an unsurpassed • opportunity to create these vista points Views of existing condominium residents on Red Hill to the north have been reasonably preserved by the design of the proposed protect The proposed protect is surrounded by development Attached condominiums occupy the properties north of the protect site, which are within the Red Hill area Slopes are a major feature of the site, with a matority of the site disturbed, and replanted with non-native species Site features include a large, concrete drainage facility (abandoned reservoir) that has the remains of spray cans, graffiti, and dumping and the pad area for a demolished water tank Evidence of squatters homes, camp sites, and trash dumping is present in canyon areas Significant visual features that frame the site are the historic Sycamore Inn on the west, the Red Hill Bluff to the north, and the abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad embankment to the east Mature heritage trees are existing on- and off-site and are discussed in a revised Arborist Study dated February 2005, by David Evans and Associates c) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Southern Pacific Rail road-right-of-way and is zoned Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 1), Mixed-Use The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant • Q, R, S, T,U,V ~p\ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 • Less Tfian Sigmfipnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PolenlNlly SipmfiWm W6fi Mnigauon Tfian Sgnificanl No I h Inw letl I act I ad 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (~) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict wdh existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (~) Williamson Act contract c) Involve other changes in the exsting environment, which, O O O (~) because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue and is zoned Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 1), Mixed-Use, and is characterized by developments to the north, south, east, and west There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is • either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue and is zoned Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 1), Mixed-Use and is characterized by existing developments to the north, south, east and west The nearest agricultural use is more north of Arrow Route (marginal grape production) from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY Would the protect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (~) air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (~) () ( ) to an existing or projected air quality wolation~ Q, R, S, T,U,V~p2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than SiBn~fipnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pgtentally Sigrvfitant Wtlh Miliga0on Ilan Sigrvfipnl No 1 h Inro teE I ct I h c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (`~) criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (~) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number O O O (~) of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions • In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aproject-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers" specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for Crty verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in • SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. o, R, s, r,u,v ~p3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 • Less Than Sigmfirant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Pdemia~ly sigrnfiwm wpm Mnigafion than sgmficant No I act Inco IeE I ct I h 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is • carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans mclude a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 2002 (URBEMIS2002) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the SCAQMD • The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures Tables 1 and 1A show construction emission results Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgmfiram wen Mmgauon roan Sigmfirant No I C Into aratetl I ct I d Table 1 URBEMIS2002 Site Grading Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~g Mit Mit Mit Mit Demolition Site Gradin ROG NOx CO PM~g Fu hive Dust - - 20 00 Off-Road Diesel 17 23 144 19 118 01 6 72 Worker Tri s 0 19 0 37 3 93 0 02 Total 17 42 144 56 121 94 26 74 SCAOMD Thres 75 100 550 150 Si nificance No Yes No No Table 1A URBEMIS2002 Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM~g Mit Md Md Mit Bld Const 26 15 212 09 184 33 9 76 Worker Tri s 2 60 5 64 57 13 0 27 Arch Coatin 434 22 -- - -- As halt 0 83 3 15 0 59 0 04 Total 463 80 220 88 242 05 10 07 SCAOMD Thres 75 100 550 150 Si nficance Yes Yes No No As indicated in Table 1, grading emissions exceed the SCAOMD threshold for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Table 1A the construction emissions exceed the SCAOMD thresholds for two of the four criteria air pollutants, Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and NOx The grading and construction of a development this size is anticipated to exceed thresholds levels However, the construction emissions are short-term (approximately twelve months) and are not considered significant Once construction is complete, the operational levels are well below SCAOMD thresholds as indicated in Table 2 Operational Emissions The site is located within the Foothill Boulevard District (Subarea 1), Mixed-Use, and the project would remain consistent with the designated land use, with the approval of a Minor Exception Residential developments currently surround the project site The majority of the emissions impacts associated with the project would result from vehicles traveling to and from the site • Mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (6th edition) values programmed into the URBEMIS 2002 model In order to reflect the nature of the proposed project, the default value of 5 76 per dwelling unit was used to reflect the vehicle trips that would most likely be associated with the proposed project Emissions associated with these vehicle trips are listed in Table 2 • Q, R, S, T,U,V ~O~j City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 LJ less Tfian Sipmficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Poteneaoy Significant wnn M,Ogaeon rnan Spmfipnt Na I act Inco ted I n I d Table 2 URBEMIS 2002 Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,p Mil Mit Mit Mil Area Source 11 22 1 70 1 31 0 00 Mobile Source 15 87 15 43 172 15 13 17 Totals 27 10 17 13 173 46 13 18 SCAOMD Thres 55 55 550 150 Si nficance No No No No After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, NO,,, ROG, and Fine Particulate Matter (PM~p) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively signifcant if they cannot be mitigated on a pro/ect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council • In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mtigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of . pollution than the population at large The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they Q, R, s, r, u, v) (~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tian Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g FdenUai~r sgmficam won MmgaGOn roan sgmfimnt No I n Into grates ~ n ~ n are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified ~n SCAOMD Rule 1401 The protect site is adtoining the nearest sensitive receptor (existing residences) Therefore, adverse impacts are anticipated Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anbapated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project () (~) () ( ) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or speaal status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (~) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (~) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (~) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sdes~ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting U (~) O ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (~) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments. a/b) In July 2003, Ecological Sciences conducted a Habitat Suitability Evaluation on the protect site The level of constraint a sensitive biological resource would pose to potential developments typically depends on the fallowing criteria The relative value of that resource The amount or degree of impact to the resource • • • Q, R, S, T,U,V~~`j City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less than Sigmfimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potemially SiBn~ficanl wiN Mmga~on roan Sigrufimnl No I ct Inw rates I d I act Whether or not impacts to the resource would be in violation of State and/or federal regulations or laws Whether or not impacts to the resource would require permitting by resources agencies The degree to which impacts on the resource would otherwise be considered "significant" under CEQA Based on an evaluation using these criteria, existing disturbed/disced areas were considered of a relatively low biological constraint and value given the context in which they occur This designation is because of the high level of disturbance that has resulted in low biological diversity, absence of special-status species to utilize or reside within these areas Because no threatened or endangered species are likely to occur in disturbed areas because of the highly disturbed conditions present in a predominantly degraded environment, construction activities in these areas would not likely jeopardize the continued existence of listed species, nor would construction adversely impact designated critical habitat Impacts to disturbed areas would also not be expected to substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor would impacts be expected to substantially alter diversity of wildlife in the area because of the current degraded habitat conditions The protect site is located in an area developed with mixed uses The site has been • previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The ma/Drily of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a tree ordinance, which states, "The Eucalyptus, Palm, Oak, Sycamore, Pine, and other trees growing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga are a natural aesthetic resource which helps define the character of the City Such trees are worthy of protection in order to preserve the scenic beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening, and counteract air pollution " David Evans and Associates Incorporated conducted an Arborist Report and Tree Inventory analysis in September 2003 and revised it in February 2005 They identified the existing conditions of the trees and reported on their type and general health (predominately focusing on Sycamores, Oaks, and Ornamentals) Pertaining to Sycamore trees, if drainage is altered, it may affect the amount of water that the Sycamores receive The trees could be adversely effected if they were to receive significantly less water than they have received historically Should this be, the developer would be advised to replace the lost water with another source, namely irrigation • Q, R, S, T,U,V ~L>rQ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 Potentially sie~e~am With Mitigation Than Significant No 1 cl Inco IeE 1 ct I ct f) An area northwest of the protect site is identified as a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 The Red Hill Golf Course occupies the adtacent area identified No conflicts with habitat conservation plans wilt occur 1) In accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a tree preservation and replacement program based on the following priorities will be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits: 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved-in-place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect () () () (~) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined In § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change m the significance O (~) U ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () ('~) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those Interred () () () (~) outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) An Historical Assessment of the protect site was conducted by Stephen R Van wormer m May 1990 and revealed the following Four historic resources were Identified as a result of research and field survey and include 1) the Cucamonga Stage station site, 2) the Sycamore Inn, 3) the Red Chief Motel, and 4) the San Bernardino Museum Archaeological Information has noted the presence of two previously recorded historic bridges (CHS-1786-1 and CHS-1786-6) as well as the old Los Angeles to San Bernardino road route (PS-BR-3-H) adtacent to the protect boundaries These resources are outside the protect area and well not be impacted However, the Sycamore Inn site is being used as access to the protect The use of a portion of the Sycamore Inn site has required some realignment of the parking layout and drive aisles but the Impact is not significant b) An Archaeological Assessment was prepared in May 1990 by Kathleen C Del Chario for the protect site The assessment concluded that all exposed ground surfaces within the protect area were examined and neither artifacts nor any indication of a subsurface deposit, or midden, was encountered Because of this, no further prehistoric archaeological investigations are recommended However, since a prehistoric scatter was previously recorded in this location, and because of the intense prehistoric activities in the local area, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented u r1 LJ 1) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or • preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation Q, R, s, r,u,v~p~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Leu Tnan Signifinnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenWflY Significant Wito Mrtigaeon Tian Sigmficanl No I cl Inwr oratetl I n I atl measures (I e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Cfty to establish Its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require Incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, Including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site Is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (I e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring Is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures• Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If . construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should Immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the fend o, R, s, r, u, v 1 I ('~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 nRC2oo4-00339. -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Sgnificanl Less Potenpally With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significam MiogaYOn Sigrvfirant No I act Inm orote0 I tl I ct Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The protect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of ongin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is regwred for all development, no mitigation is regwred in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would fhe project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, intury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (~) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shakings O O (~) ( ) m) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (~) liquefaction iv) Landshdes~ O O O (~) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the toss of topsoii~ () (~) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (~) that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined m Table 18-1-B () (~) () ( ) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (~) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) Eberhart Consultants, Inc prepared a Geotechnical Investigation and Fault Study The investigation concluded the following No known active faults pass through the site and the subtect property has experienced strong groundshaking from earthquakes that have occurred L J Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 nRC?n04-00339. -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 less Tfian Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PoleNially signi6tanl Wilfi Meigaaon Tfian Significant No 1 act Inco letl I ci I act in the southern California region and will likely experience strong ground shaking in the future The largest estimated median and 84th percentile PHGA are 0 473g and 0 7538, respectively associated with a 7 OMw earthquake on the Cucamonga Fault The potential for on-site liquefaction is considered low No known landsliding exists on the sublect property However, approximately the eastern third of the site is within an Earthquake Fault Zone, along the Red Hill Fault, in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1l4 mile of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 5 miles north These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes, is 1 5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is 15 mile northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is sublect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403, or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer Widespread subsidence, on the order of 1 to 2 feet, because of groundwater withdrawal has been predicted for the southern part of the City The protect site is located in the southern portion of the City and it could be sublect to subsidence However, there are no known indications that this is occurring The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy (0-9 percent slopes), Saugus Sandy Loam (30-50 percent slopes), and Ramona Sandy Loam (9-15 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No • adverse impacts are anticipated Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~ Z City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRCQ005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Sigrnficant Less Poteneally Wtl~ Tftan ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sgmfi~nl MNgaYOn Sgmfipm No I d Into letl I act I tl d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Saugus Soil, and Ramona Sandy Loam (9-15 percent slopes) associations, according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 These soils are typically well-drained, steep soils Slopes are 30 to 50 percent and elevation is approximately 1,200 to 2,500 feet Several recommendations for the design and construction of manufactured slopes were identified in the Geotechnical Investigation and Fault Study prepared by Eberhart Consultants 5) Fill slopes 30 feet or less in height should have a keyway toe (a special backfilled excavation, which is constructed beneath the toe area of a planned fill slope on sloping ground to improve the stability of the slope). Fill slopes greater than 30 feet in height should have a keyway width equal to one-half the slope height with a depth of 5 feet at the keyway toe All keyways should be tilted a minimum of 2 percent towards the back of the keyway • 6) Backcuts for stabilized slopes 30 feet or less in height should be excavated at a 2.1 gradient Backcuts for stabilized slopes greater than 30 feet in height can be excavated at gradients up to 1.5 1 provided the fill at the top of these slopes is at least 15 feet thick. All stabilized slopes should be constructed and drained in . accordance with the specifications and details in Appendix H of the Geotechnicai Investigation and Fault Study (specifications 5.50 thru 5 57). Adherence to these design specifications would ensure stable construction slopes. 7) For residences, setbacks from bottom outer edges of foundations, walls, etc. adtacent a top-of-slope should be setback from the slope face a horizontal distance of one-third the slope height under consideration in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code The horizontal distance should not be less than 5 feet 8) Buildings adtacent the toe of a slope should be set back a horizontal distance equal to one-half the vertical height of the slope in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code with minimum and maximum setbacks of 3 feet and 15 feet, respectively In addition the following recommendations should be included in the CCBR's for the homeowners association To ensure proper maintenance of the slopes 9) All slopes should be landscaped with drought resistant vegetation. A landscape architect should be consulted for recommendations on appropriate plant types and planting configuration 10) Interim measures should be considered to protect the slopes prior to the establishment of landscaping. These measures may Include the utilization of geotechnical erosion fabrics or acceptable alternatives 11) Drainage devices should be inspected and maintained at regular intervals and . should not be obstructed. Q, R, S, T,U,V 1~3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 1r1 \_ Leu Than Sigmfignt Less Issues and Su ortin Informatics Sources PP 9 Potentially Sipn,fipnt w~N NLagaoon roan Sipmfipnl No I d Inc tea I n I d 12) The slopes should be periodically inspected for the presence of burrowing rodents. If an infestation of burrowing rodents is confirmed, they should be eliminated from the slopes 13) Provisions should be made to interrupt automatic timing devices of irrigation systems during the rainy seasons e) The prolect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the prolect () () () (~) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (~) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (~) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1l4 mile of an existing or proposed school d) Be located on a site which is included on a hst of O O O (~) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area f) For a prolect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstnp, would U U O (~) the prolect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the prolect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an O O O (~) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (~) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Q, R, S, T,U,V IIy City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than $tgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polenuany Significant With Mingahon Than Signifipnt No I C Inco lea I h I C Comments a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies In addition, PIC Environmental Services completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report in June 2003 and concluded that based upon the results of the Phase I assessment, and the research of available records, there was no evidence that environmental impairments exist at the subject property Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected u b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated • c) There are no schools located within 1l4 mile of the project site The nearest existing schools are located 41 mile to the northeast (Valley Vista Elementary), to the south (Los Amigos Elementary), and to the southeast (Bear Gulch Elementary) Typically, the uses proposed do not create obtectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site The Phase I site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The protect site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the protect includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire . hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 Q, R, S, T,U,V rl~s City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 u Less Tnan Sgmfioant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentally Significant wan MM1igaaon Tnan Sgmfipnt No 1 ad Into g21etl I d I d 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project () () () (/) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge regwrements~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere U (/) O (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defeat in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () (/) ( ) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capaaty of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as O (/) O ( ) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other Flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () (/) () ( ) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () (/) () ( ) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp I) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ O O O ('~) Comments a) Water and sewer service is to be provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource • Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Q, R, S, T, U, V ~~ CO City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tfian Significant Less PolenaallY WM1fi Tfian Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sigrvfipnt Miuga4on Sigrvficanl No I acl Inco orale0 I C I cl Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of clonstruction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Construction Permit The General Construction Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs • Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction protect for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the protect will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) for • post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WOMP, prepared by Hall and Foreman, Inc dated May 2004, that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping, can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Constructon Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include • the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to Q, R, S, T,U,VI~-] City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tfian 9gruficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgmficanl win MM1igaUOn roan Sgnificam No I n Inmr tetl Im C I n ensure that any erosion which does occur ether on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remedmtion or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) Durng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed poor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust m order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 5) It shall be the hired contractor's responsibility to inspect and maintain all BMPs m good working order Inspection and maintenance responsibility shall remain for the duration of the protect Post-Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Hall and Foreman, Inc dated May 2004 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpestiades/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval poor to the issuance of grading permits b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a Master Plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development atywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City • Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, an increase in runoff from the site will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The Impact is not considered signfcant Q, R, S, T, U, V I ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentally Sigeufipnt With Mifiga4on Than S,Bn~firant No I act In<o le0 I C I n d) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect wdl not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, an increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff wdl be conveyed to existing storm drain faalities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result m substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, an increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities assoaated with the construction period could result ~n a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented S) Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval a WOMP, including a protect descnption and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004. 9) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Offiaal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g/h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year Flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected t) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche • and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~ C'~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 f)RC2004-00339. -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 • Less Than $ignifi~ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially $ig,ufirant With Mifiga4on Than Significant No I n Inco tea ~ d ~ n Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O U (~) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or O O U (~) natural community conservation plan Comments• a) The site is located within the Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts and is characterized by mixed commeraal and residential developments to the north, south, east, and west The protect includes the development of 21 acres into 206 condominiums The protect would not conflict with any environmental plans or policies upon approval of the proposed General Plan and Development District Code Amendments The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are antiapated b) The protect site land use designation is Mixed Use The proposed protect is the request to construct 206 condominiums on 21 acres The developer is proposing to construct the development on land with up to 30 percent slopes, which regwres a Development Code and a General Plan Amendment See Section 6 of the General Plan FEIR for a discussion of geotechnical requirements to ensure that the protect can be developed under these conditions The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan with the proposed amendment and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no tmpacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered speaes of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project () () () (~) a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result m the loss of avadabddy of a locally important O O O (~) mtneral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Q, R, S, T,U,V I Z~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenUally Signifinnl W~Vi Mnigahon Than Sigmfiranl No 1 act Inrn led I n I tl Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result rn () (~) () ( ) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (~) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels O O O (~) in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () () () (~) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing withcut the protect e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan or, O O O ('~) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels f) For a protect wthin the vianity of a private airstrip, would O O O (~) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out BridgeNet International conducted an Exterior Noise Analysis in September 2003 The total noise exposure level will consist of the sum of the traffic noise combined on an energy basis The traffic noise exposure will be dominated by the noise generated from traffic on Foothill Boulevard at the southern portion of the protect site The total unmitigated noise exposure level at the condominiums closest to Foothill Boulevard will be as high as 68 3 dB CNEL The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p.m and 6.30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line lr1 u Q, R, S, T,U,V ~Z~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 u Less Than Signifiwnl Less PolenOally Wah Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sign,fipnl M,Lga4on SignifiWnl No I n In tea I n I C Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Department. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase b) The uses associated with this type of proiect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The proiect site is located within the Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts The proiect includes the development of 21 acres into 206 condominiums The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the proiect • d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 5) Once building plans are submitted for permits, an interior noise analysis shall be done for buildings in this protect to determine the type of building materials to be used to ensure that buildings meet interior noise standards of 45d6 CNEL 6) Noise barriers should be constructed around the patios and balconies of the buildings along the southern portion of the protect site, adfacent to Foothill Boulevard The first floor patio barriers shall be 5 112 feet in height and the second and third floor balcony barriers shall be 5 0 feet in height. • e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ Z Z City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than Significant Less Potenlully Wafi Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources $ignifipm Miogafion Significant No I n Inco lea I n I n f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the protect () () () (~) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing hcusing, () () () (~) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (~) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population _ growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and well not attract new employees to the area The protect includes the development of 21 acres into 206 condominiums The development is anticipated to generate a ratio of 2 6 persons per unit or . approximately 585 additional residents However, growth is anticipated and is designed in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter 17 32, Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines for development of Subarea 1 No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services () () (~) ( ) a) Fire protection () () (~) ( ) b) Police protections () () (~) ( ) c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Parksv e) Other public faclhties~ O O (~) ( ) Comments• a) Fire Protection -The Insurance Services Office, Inc (ISO) collects information on a community's public fire protection and analyzes the data using their Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS) They then assign a Public Protection Classification (PPC) on a scale from one to ten Class one represents the best public protection, and Class ten indicates less than Q, R, S, T, U, V l Z 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tnan Sigrufiram Less PolentullY W~Ifi Tfian Issues and Supporting Information Sources $iB^~fimnl -M^~igaLOn Sgnifia _ .«..~,.n o-,.,ac No the minimum recognized protection Each Fire District is evaluated every five years and is reported to insurance companies as a factor in setting the premiums they charge for property insurance, the better the community's PPC grade, the lower the premiums for property insurance According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Construction Services, the City is rated a Class Three According to the ISO, a class three rating in California is m the upper 15 percent of the entire state The site would be served by a fire station located approximately 2 miles from the protect site This site, designated Mixed-Use, is intended for the development of 206 condominwms The proposed development would generate approximately 585 residents The City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District indicates that for every 1,000 atizens, an average of 0 27 firefighter is on-duty (based on conversation with John Thomas, City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Construction Serv~ceslPlan Check Manager, January 2003) Under existing considerations, the Fue Protection District would be able to provide adequate fire protection for the proposed condominium development and the impact would be less-than-sigmficant The protect wdl not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline m the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Bwlding and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Police protection -The City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department (SBSD) and currently has 96 uniformed officers assigned to the City With an estimated population of 154,780 people, the ratio of officers to citizens is approximately 0 62 per 1,000 residents (based on conversation with Dan Waters, Crime Analyst assigned to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, January 2003) The average response time to an emergency call for service is approximately four minutes, response times are evaluated on a monthly basis The Sheriffs Department reviews response times annually, and the ratio of officers to the City's population to determine if more officers are needed to keep the response time below five minutes The proposed protect would generate approximately 585 people This would result in a demand for less than a one percent increase in officers to maintain the City's current level of service The impact is considered less-than-significant Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and wail not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) Schools -Rancho Cucamonga is divided into four different elementary and intermediate school districts Alta Loma, Central, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda A total of twenty-one elementary schools and seven middle schools currently exist within the City of Rancho Cucamonga This site is served by the Central School District The Central School District serves the western portion of Rancho Cucamonga and includes five elementary schools and two tumor-high schools with a capaaty of 5,885 students Portable classrooms are used to alleviate overcrowding problems Funding is the deterrent to faality expansion and the City and school districts are addressing the problem by requesting State and Federal funding The City also meets the needs for schools by collecting developer school impact fees The fees currently are $1 93 per square foot for residential construction and $ 31 per square foot for commeraal and industrial developments • The elementary and the high school districts share revenues generated by the school impact fees The proposed protect is anticpated to generate approximately 105 students (37 Elementary students, 15 Middle School students and 53 High School students) The Q, R, S, T,U,V ~Zy City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tfian Significant Less Potentially Wa0 Tftan Issues and Supporting Information Sources S,gnifiram Mmgahon Sigmfirant No I C Inco tee I C I ct developer will be required to pay the appropriate schools fees prior to occupancy Therefore, this impact is considered less-than-significant In addition to the primary and intermediate schools, the City of Rancho Cucamonga includes four high schools within the Chaffey Joint Unified School District The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the prolect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the school districts are not considered significant No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest parks are located 8 mile northeast (Red Hill Community Park) and southeast (Bear Gulch Neighborhood Park) from the prolect site The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facllltles or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative • development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the prolect () () () (~) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the prolect include recreational facilities or require () () () (~) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located 3l4 mile from the prolect site Various recreational facilities are available within the City According to the General Plan EIR, the City has approximately 261 • acres of developed parks (excluding trails) Neighborhood parks range in size from 5 to 10 acres, while community parks generally range from 12 to 44 acres in size The regional and community trail system within the City includes an additional 248 acres of Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~-5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 • less Tfian Sipnifipnl Less Potentially W~fi T1wn Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sipn~fiwnl I MNpafion Significant No r ,....,,,~,en Invatl Irtpa recreational lands Approximately 150 acres of proposed recreational lands exist within the City that has not yet been developed Residents within the City also have limited use of school faalities for various recreational actiwties and sports leagues through agreements between the certain school districts and surrounding communities The City's current goal regarding parks involves designating 5 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents Based on this goal, the City ~s currently expenencing a deficiency of approximately 118 9 acres of developed parkland The City currently collects 3 acres of parkland or in-lieu fees for every residential subdivision of 1,000 residences Some additional sources of funding for parklands include general fund revenues, developer impact fees, State and Federal grants, user group contributions, school district toint use contributions, concessions, and encouraging large residential protects to incorporate private recreational facilities beyond the City's regwrements The General Plan EIR indicates the City estimates development of approximately 232 acres of recreational faalities (parks, special use faalities) by 2020, in addition to the currently designated 150 acres of designated area intended for recreational purposes, but not yet developed These areas, when combined with the existing recreational facilities within the City, would total 891 acres Based on the General Plan population protections for 2020, the City would require a total of 781 acres of parkland to meet the City's parkland goal The proposed protect would generate approximately 585 people and a standard condition of . approval will regwre the developer to pay park development fees andlor designate area for parklands With the protection of the General Plan for the availability of parklands exceeding demand, the protect would not significantly impact recreational facilities within the City b) See a) response above • 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relaticn to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) () () () (~) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (~) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (~) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (~) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm egwpment)~ e) Result in inadequate emergency access O O O (~) f) Result in inadequate parking capacdy~ O O O (~) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () (~) ( ) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Q, R, S, T, U, V j Z, (D City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tfian Signifiwnl Less Potenfially Wt~ Tfian Issues and Supporting InformaUOn Sources Significant Mmgaaon Sigmfiranl No I n Inc led I tl I ad Comments a) Llnocut Law & Greenspan Engineers conducted a Traffic Impact Study in July 2003 The study focused on seven Intersections to determine the potential traffic Impacts during the morning and evening commute peak hours (between 7 00 and 9 00 a m and 4 00 and 6 00 p m on a typical weekday The study concluded that the protect would generate on a typical weekday approximately 1,283 dally two-way trips, with 96 trips (15 inbound, 81 outbound) produced In the AM peak hour and 118 trips (79 Inbound, 39 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour The results of the traffic analysis indicated that the proposed protect well not adversely Impact any of the seven key study Intersections when compared to City of Rancho Cucamonga, Clty of Upland, and San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Level of Service standards and significance traffic impact criteria The seven key study Intersections currently operate, and are protected to operate with the Inclusion of protect traffic, at an acceptable service level during AM and PM peak commuter hours • As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development well contribute to the traffic load, in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street Improvements existing or Included In protect design The protect will not create a substantial Increase In the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at Intersections The protect site well be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per Clty • roadway standards In addition, the Clty has established a transportation development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The protect will generate 1,283 two-way peak hour trips, which Is less than 250 two-way peak hour trips for non-retail land use, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino CMP criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect is In an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The protect will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site Is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are anticipated d) The protect is in an area that Is mostly developed The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site Access to the site Is from Foothill Boulevard and Red HIII Country Club Drive The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The protect design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho • Cucamonga Development Code and well therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, parking associated with the Q, R, S, T,U,V ~Z7 Page 31 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Than SigmBCant Less Potenlally Wilh Titan Issues and Supporting Information Sources Sigmfirant Muigaoon Signifipnl No Im C Inro IeE I n ~ n protect should be approximately 405 spaces, the protect developer has provided a suffiaent number of spaces No impacts are anticipated g) The protect site is within the Foothill Corridor Mixed Use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts According to the Rancho Cucamonga Draft General Plan Exhibit III-13 "Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan," the southeast portion of the site adjoins the abandoned Southern Paafic Rail Road -Proposed Multi-Purpose Regional Trail The regional Multi-Purpose Trail serves as the backbone of the public trails system, covering long distances and connecting to regional parks, open space preserves, national forests, and other regional trails leading beyond the community This trail should provide for equestrian, pedestrian, and bicycle use The right-of-way standard for regional trails is 30 feet minimum width The Planning Commission, based on physical constraints, may grant an exception to the standard Additionally, according to Exhibit III-7 "General Bikeway Plan," the site also adjoins a Class I (southeast portion of the site abandoned Southern Pacific Rail Road - Proposed Multi-Purpose Regional Trail) and Class II (Foothill Boulevard) Bikeway Plan Class I consists of bicycle trails that are essentially "off-street" and separated from motor vehicles They are a minimum of 8 feet in width for two-way travel and include bike lane signage and designating street crossing where needed A Class I bike path may parallel a roadway (within the parkway) or may be a completely separate right-of-way that meanders through a neighborhood or along a flood control channel Class II bikeways are located next to the curb or edge of paved roadway and are a minimum of 5 feet in width They include bike lane • signage, special lane lines, and other pavement markings Adherence to the City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan," and "General Bikeway Plan," this impact is considered less-than-significant The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) • 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project () () () (~) a) Exceed wastewater treatment regwrements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () (~) ( ) wastewater treatment faalities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () (~) ( ) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facildies, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (~) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed () () () (~) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capaaty to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments O O O (~) f) Be served by a landfill wdh sufficient permitted capacdy to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs Q, R, S, T, U, V~ Z~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Less Than $igmfiranl Less POlenUally WM1h Tlwn $igmfifant MlllgaYOn $ipmfinnt NO g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O O O (~) regulations related to solid waste Comments• a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana RWOCB regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b/e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana RWOCB regarding wastewater CVWD is an independent special district that provides sewer collection, water treatment and distribution services to 152,000 customers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, portions of the cities of Ontario, Fontana, and Upland, and a portion of the unincorporated area of the County Annually, the CVWD adopts afive-year CIP for infrastructure improvements and new protects Every five years, the CVWD completes a Water and Sewer Master Plan Study, which was most recently updated in 2000 (Cucamonga County Water District LAFCO SpherelService Review Report, September, 2002) The CVWD water sources include groundwater, surface ("Canyon") water, and imported water There are currently a total of 23 groundwater wells (17 in the Cucamonga Basin and bin the Chino Basin) The CVWD total capacitmofaumopxmatelun5l 800 acrde-feet/year) both basins is 32,121 gallons per minute (gp ) (pp Y Capital improvement funds are budgeted annually to recondition and rehabilitate wells as needed Three water treatment facilities treat local surface water and imported water The total treatment capacity of all three plants is 57 5 million gallons per day (mgd) with an additional 18 mgd expected to be on-line in mid-2003 These plants currently provide treatment for an average of 32 mgd The distribution system has approximately 230 miles of primary distribution Imes Pipelines include cement mortar lined and wrapped steel pipe and cement mortar coated steel pipe (Cucamonga County Water District LAFCO Sphere/Service Review Report, September, 2002) The CVWD funds water and sewer system capital improvements, primarily through developer fees ("Development Capacity Charges") for the right to connect to CVWD systems The amount of the charge is based on the size of a meter installed for a new customer (Cucamonga County Water District LAFCO Sphere/Service Review Report, September, 2002) The protect developer will be required to pay fees for service to the CVWD The impact to the District's water treatment and distribution system is determined to be less-than-significant c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect would increase demand upon storm drain systems because of the increased runoff from new hardscape and rooftops proposed A Final Drainage Report would address protected storm flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is less-than-significant ~J • LJ Q, R, S, T, U, V I Z 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 `r 1 u Less Than I Sgnificanl Less Potenfially With Tnan Issues and Supporting Information Sources SiBn~ficam Mmgamn Significant No I act Inco oraleE I act Im ad d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There Is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No Impacts are anticipated f/g) Soled waste dlsposal well be provided by the current Clty contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's soled waste dlsposal needs Soled waste collection and dlsposal services are currently supplied by the City's contracted hauler and transported to the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill in the City of Rialto or other County landfills in the Valley San Bernardino County of Public Works, Solid Waste Management Department (SWMD) operates the landfills According to the General Plan EIR, the City generates approximately 270 tons of solid waste per day The EIR indicates that the City would generate an increase of approximately 236 tons per day by 2020, which accounts for an 87 percent increase over the existing generated solid waste The current permitted capacity of the Mid-Valley Landfill is estimated to the year 2035 SWMD does not foresee any significant impacts resulting from protected growth and solid waste generation since the countywide waste management system is planned for expansions to meet the growing demands within the County's service area This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The Clty of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () (~) ( ) a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () (~) ( ) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () (~) ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly Comments a) The site is not located m an area of sensitive biological resources as Identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street Improvements, It is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site However, portions of the site support remnants of native scrub habitat of varying quality and composition The occurrence potential for most special-status species associated with this habitat type would generally be considered low because of the fragmented (e g ,from various Q, R, S, T, U, V 130 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 Less Tfian Significant Less Potentially Wilfi Tfian Issues and Supporting Information Sources $iB^~fieant h4agauon $iq~ufipnt No I act Into letl I C I n anthropogenic disturbances) and often degraded conditions (e g ,from invasive vegetation) of scrub habitats present, relatively small habitat patch sizes, and surrounding land uses that have Isolated the site from larger contiguous habitats Nonetheless, the potential pnatcatcherf several special-status species associated with scrub habitats (e g , g rufous-crowned sparrow, and sage sparrow) may impose some degree of constraint to development Depending upon the particular species, as well as the nature, extent, and seasonal timing of proposed construction activities, special mitigation measures to avoid or reduce potential protect-related impacts to these sensitive biological resources (if present) may be required pursuant to CEQA The mitigation measures recommended under Section 4, Biological Resources, has addressed this concern b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The proposed protect Is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as proposed to be amended The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the Clty and Sphere of Influence The Clty made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce Impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the Clty adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits Include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts Is required c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Adding pollutants to an area where air quality Is a problem will have an affect on achieving goals, however, all pollutant levels area at a point below thresholds set to avoid adverse health effects associated with the pollutants The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained In this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less- than-significant levels Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 nRr.~nnn-nns39. -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 r1 l~ • \_J EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Foothill Boulevard Specifc Plan EIR (SCH #87021615, certified September 16, 1987) (/) Cameo Homes Arborist Report and Tree Inventory, prepared by David Evans and Assoaates Revised February 2005 (/) Eberhart Consultants, Inc, Geotechnical Investigation and Fault Study (/) Ecological Sciences, Habdat Suitabddy Evaluation, July 2003 (/) BridgeNet International, Exterior Noise Analysis, September, 2003 (/) Linocut Law & Greenspan Engineers, Traffic Impact Study, July 2003 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Date ~ - y -U 6 Signature -~ Pnnt Name and Title ~~~` ~)~ ~ `-~ e Se~ ~ r ~S~ ~~S ~S$OCra~' Q, R, S, T, U, V / 3 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declarahon is being circulated for publrc review in accordance with the Cal~forma Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 0(the Public Resources Code. Prolect Fde No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Vanance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 Public Review Penod Closes: April 12, 2006 Prolect Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map)• Located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hdl Country Club Drive and Southern Pacific Road Right-of-Way - APN 0207-101-13, 31, and 37, and 8318 Foothill Boulevard - APN 0207-101-24 Prolect Descnption: An application to amend the General Plan and Development Code to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope within a mixed use area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, a residential subdivision of 8 lots for condominwm purposes, and design review of bwlding elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominwms on 21 acres of land in the western Foothill Boulevard Mixed Use Corridorarea within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Distncts, and a request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet of an existing parking lot, and a request to construct a parking lot, loading area modifications, and covered patio area at the Historical Sycamore Inn Restaurant FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Envvonmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is mulled to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration dunng the review period. April 12 2006 Date of Determination Adopted ey Q, R, S, T,U,V X33 • RESOLUTION NO 06-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00339 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS A 30 PERCENT SLOPE UNDER SPECIFIED CONDITIONS, INCLUDING LAND, WITHIN A MIXED USE AREA WITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-13, 01 AND 34 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on Aprii 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically fords as follows a The application applies to land having a 30 percent or greater slope that is located south of Banyan Street, including an approximately 21 acres of land, basically an irregular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Dnve and the Southern Panfic Road Right-of-Way, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Mixed Use, and b Properties to the north are developed with condommwms and single-family homes designated Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commernal uses. East of the site is the abandoned Southem Panfic Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed • Use land use and Office/Commernal to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adtacent to the Medium Density residential development, and Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 3 ~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-36 DRC2004-00339 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 c Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code were not intended to apply as uniformly as with a residential designated parcel from a slope density calculation stand point The intent of the Hillside density restrictions was to address natural slopes, particularly those located north of Banyan Street In this case we have a 20 acre fractured site surrounded by developed land located south of Banyan Street In fact, the site has been so altered (Foothill Boulevard , R R Line, a water reservoir, and a water tank with graded access roads), that the site is no longer in a natural condition Few, if any other saes with 30 percent slopes exist south of Banyan Street and so this amendment will have limited application in the City Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for the implementation of the Mixed Use designation m this area, and e In as much as an Office Commercial use allowed underthe Mixed Use Designation would not be subject to the Hillside Density provisions of the General Plan and Development Code but would allow anon-residential project of the same or more intense bwlding mass, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties r1 LJ 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the subject property is swtable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, and b That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the envvonment nor the surrounding properties, and That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed . below as conditions of approval Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 3 S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-36 DRC2004-00339 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 3 c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, by amending the General Plan Text, as shown in the attached Exhibits A, C, and D, and m accordance with the conditions shown below PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a • result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS . NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS Q, R, S, T,U,V ~3~ TABLE 111-27 SLOPE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Natural Guidelines Slo e 5 or less This is not a hillside condition Grading with conventional, fully padded lots and terracin is acce table 5 to 7 9 Development with grading is permitted in this zone, but existing landforms must retain their natural character Padded building sites are permitted, however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and fill, and split level architecture, or padding for the structures only, may be regwred to reduce grading When in contunction with the techniques described above, and for a protect within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider the use of mass grading techniques adtacent to theses ecial desi n features as artial coin Hance with this standard 8 to 14.9 This is a hillside condition Speaal hillside architectural and design techniques that minimize grading are regwred in this zone. Architectural prototypes are ected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split level exp foundations of greater than 18 inches, stem walls, stacking and clustering. In contunction with the alternative techniques described above, and for a protect within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider padded building sites adtacent to those specal features when it is found that said grading creates a better relationship between that s ecial desi n feature and the ad acent lots 15 to 29 9 Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less casually prominent slopes, and then only where it can be shown that safety, encaronmental and aesthetic impacts can be minimized Use of larger lots, variable setbacks and variable building structural techniques such as stepped, or pole foundations are expected. Structures shall blend with the natural encaronment through their shape, materials, and colors Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by followin natural contours, or usin rade se arations 30 and This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited unless all the over following are satisfied (il the property is located south of Banyan Street, (u) at least 75°/ of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures and (ui) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site EXHIBIT A Q, R, s, r,u,v 137 • r1 LJ 6.4.8.2 Hillside development should minimize alteration of the natural landforms and be • clustered where feasible to retain maximum open space. Discussion: Our obfectives for managing development in hillside areas are to maintain existing slopes, vegetation, wildlife corridors, drainage patterns, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines wherever feasible Furthermore, we should avoid development that would result in fire, flooding, landslide, erosion, and other safety hazards W e seek hillside development that limits the extent of grading alterations to natural landforms, and provides for innovate design and arrangement of building sites that retain significant natural habitats and features Existing slopes vegetation wildlife ____..~__....as....l ....L.d.lnne ,no • • EXHIBIT C Q, R S, T, U, V ~ 3 ~j 2.1.2 Geologic Hazards The City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, is primarily underlain . by five different types of geologic deposits metamorphic basement rock of the eastern San Gabrel Mountains, • older alluvium underlying the Red Hdl area, • alluvial fan deposits ranging from Pleistocene to recent times, alluvial deposits in modern washes, and • wind-blown sands underlying the south-central portion of the City. These different types of geologic deposits, in large measure, control the distnbution of geologic hazards in the City They are further detailed on Exhibit V-2, Geology of Rancho Cucamonga An additional component of our geologic heritage is reflected in Exhibit V-3, Soil Types of Rancho Cucamonga Examination of these two exhibits reveals the clear dominance of alluvial fans that extend out from the San Gabriel Mountains The alluvial areas are dominated by various degrees of sandy loam, although a significant deposit of wind-blown sands has importance in the southerly portion of our City. As discussed further in the policy section, a key consideration in how geologic and soil conditions are managed under our policies is the slope condition combined with these natural attributes We make a distinction between slopes with the following characteristics, which are illustrated in Exhibit V-4, Slopes of Rancho Cucamonga • Slopes less than 10% slope No speaal treatment is regwred because of slope. Slopes between 10 and 30% Special treatment under our hillside development standards is required Slopes in excess of 30%: No development is permitted m these areas, It is important to keep in mind, particularly in the hillside development areas, that geologic and sod conditions can cause properties of a similar steepness to be managed differently because of differences in their vulnerability to erosion, failure, or other complications resulting from grading and development activity Our debris-flow hazard depends on numerous factors soil depth and composition, the kind of vegetation and the size of tree roots, subtle variations in slope shape, road cuts, drainage pipes, incongruities in underlying bedrock, and even the presence of small animal burrows In addition, water can collapse a slope after traveling beneath the surface from miles away. • EXHIBIT D-1 o R s.r,u,v 13`~ 2.3.2. Geological Hazards • 2.32.1 We shall continue enforcement of our Hillside Development Gwdelines to ensure prudent development and redevelopment for all property greater than 10% m slope, and continue to preserve as open space property greater than 30% in slope except as otherwise provided below. Discussion: The most effective way we have to protect lives and property from debrs flows and slope instability is to continue to prohibit development on property that exceeds about 30%in slope, in accordance with current ordinances, unless all the following are satisfied (i) the property is - - .,- -~ --- .~_ _..~..,,,. ,.a a~ Ucvcly Illc~u u u........... ... .. ~_..__..___ _ roposed protect is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological actors of the site. Property having a natural slope betweenl0% and 30% can be made unstable by actiwties of man Therefore, we have adopted hillside development gwdelines for those areas Our hillside development gwdelines enforce the existing grading standards and regwre aesthetic treatments that both improve the appearance of the hillsides and preserve the stability of the slopes These measures include returning slopes to their natural appearance and steepness after grading Environmental preservation of the eastern San Gabnel Mountains is also requved to reduce debris flow potential Development of the hillside terrain will only increase the potential for debris flows to damage the City unless the situation is carefully managed • EXHIBIT D-2 Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ y • RESOLUTION NO 06-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2004-00352, AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND THAT CONTAINS A 30 PERCENT SLOPE WITHIN AMIXED-USE AREA WITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY - APN~ 0207-101-13, 01 AND 34, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates fled an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 21 acres of land, basically an irregular configuration, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Dnve and the Southern Panfic Road Right-of-Way, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Mixed Use, and b Properties to the north are developed with condominiums and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commernal uses East of the site is the abandoned Southern Paafic Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed • Use land use and Office/Commernal to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adtacent to the Medum Density residential development Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-37 DRC2004-00352 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apn112,2006 Page 2 c Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code were never intended to apply as urnformly as with a residential designated parcel from a slope density calculation stand point The intent of the Hillside density restrictions was to address natural slopes, in this case we have a 20 acre fractured site surrounded by developed land In fact, the site has been so altered (Foothill Boulevard , R R Line, a water reservoir, and a water tank with graded access roads, that the site is not natural as to not even being within the intent of the Hillside density requirement of the Development Code Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and wdl provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for the implementation of the Mixed Use designation m this area, and a Inasmuch as an Office Commercial use allowed underthe Mixed Use Designation would no be subject to the Hillside Density provisions of the General Plan and Development Code but would allow anon-residential project of the same or more intense budding mass, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows C~ a This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c The proposed amendment wdl not be detnmentat to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity, and The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code, and The proposed amendment is m conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared • therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~{Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-37 DRC2004-00352 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 . Page 3 b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant envvonmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wail have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl 2006 by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS' ABSENT COMMISSIONERS Q, R, S, T, U, v I y 3 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2004-00352, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND THAT CONTAINS A 30 PERCENT SLOPE UNDER SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES INCLUDING LAND WITHIN AMIXED-USE AREA WITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A Recitals 1 On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearng with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 06-37, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Amendment 2 On May 17, 2006, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordnance have occurred B Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1 This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct SECTION 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on May 17, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to land having a 30 percent or greater slope that is located south of Banyan Street, including an approximately 21 acres of land, basically an irregular configuration, located on the north side of Foothtll Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Paafic Road Right-of-Way, and is presently vacant Said property is currently designated as Mixed Use, and b. Properties to the north are developed with condominiums and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and ~s developed with office and commercial uses East of the site is the abandoned Southern Paafic Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to • the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adtacent to the Medium Density residential development, and O ~ ~ r,u,v ~4y CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2004-00352 May 17, 2006 Page 2 c Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code were not intended to apply as uniformly as with a residential designated parcel from a slope density calculation stand point The intent of the Hillside density restnctions was to address natural slopes, particularly those located north of Banyan Street In this case we have a 20 acre fractured site surrounded by developed land located south of Banyan Street In fact, the site has been so altered (Foothill Boulevard , R R Line, a water reservoir, and a water tank with graded access roads), that the site is no longer in a natural condition Few, if any other sites with 30 percent slopes exist south of Banyan Street and so this amendment will have limited application in the City Therefore, this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Pollees of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and d This amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for the implementation of the Mixed Use designation in this area; and e In as much as an Office Commercial use allowed under the Mixed Use Designation would not be subtect to the Hillside Density provisions of the General Plan and Development Code but would allow anon-residential protect of the same or more intense building mass, this amendment would not be materially incurious or detrimental to the adtacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties SECTION 3 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, this Counel finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Irntial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent cudgment of the City Counel, and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain sigmficant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Irntial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Councl during the public heanng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse • effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Q. R ~, T, U, V I `~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO DRC2004-00352 May 17, 2006 . Page 2 SECTION 4 Chapter 17 24, is hereby amended to change 17 24 050 Hillside designation, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A " SECTION 5 17 24 080 Density, is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in Exhibit B SECTION 6 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent furisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance The City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation SECTION 7 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published m the City of Ontario, Californa, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California • • Q, R, S, T,U,V ~ylo Title 17 DEVELOPMENT CODE . Chapter 17 24 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 17.24.050 Hillside designation. The following shall serve as general standards for the five established slope zones to ensure that development will compliment the overall character of the landform In order to permit the extension of a logical design concept, the standards for one zone may be applied to limited portions of the adtacent zone Slope Zone % Natural Slope Standards 1 5 or less This is not a hillside condition Grading with conventional fully padded lots and terracing is acceptable 2 5 to 7 99 Development with grading is permitted in this zone but existing landforms must retain their natural character Padded budding sites are permitted, however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and fill, and split level architectural prototypes, or padding for the • structures only, may be regwred to reduce grading In contunction with the techniques described above and fora protect within a master plan which includes specal design features, such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, as exemplified in the following cluster development, the planning commission may consider the use of mass grading techniques adtacent to these special design features as partial compliance with this standard. C~ EXHIBIT A Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~=zr b p / ~, ?i ~° e O O ~ . _( -i ~-. ~~ °U 7 mow' e.'~-..,;.ten C':~~ -, , 3 8 to 14 9 This is a hillside condition Special hillside architectural and design techrnques that minimize grading are regwred in this zone Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split level foundations of greater than eighteen inches, stem walls, stacking, and clustering In conjunction with the alternative techniques described above and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features, such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, the planning commission may consider padded bwlding sites adjacent to those special features when it is found that said grading creates a better relationship between that special design feature and the adjacent lots 4 15 to 29 9 Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less visually prominent slopes, and then only where it can be shown that safety, environmental, and aesthetic impacts can be minimized Use of • larger lots, variable setbacks, and variable bwlding structural techniques Q, R, S, T,U,V ~y8 such as stepped or pole foundations are expected Structures shall blend • with the natural environment through their shape, materials, and colors Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by following natural contours or using grade separations 5 30 and over This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street (u) at least 75% of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development aoolication are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures, and (ui) the proposed project is determined to aooropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site C~ C1 Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ y r1 LJ r1 ~J 17.24.080 Density. Slope density regulations which correlate intensity of development to steepness of terrain will be used to minimize grading, removal of vegetation, land instability, and fire hazards The total allowable residential dwelling units shall be calculated based on the total (bwldable) land area within each slope category multiplied by the capacity factor for each to the slope category A Calculation of Density The maximum number of units that may be permitted in a proposed development shall be determined by multiplying that area of land in each slope category by the capaaty factor shown in the following table, taking the products of these calculations converted to square feet, and dividing this figure by the regwred site area unit in square feet prescribed m the underlying zoning district (except the hillside residential district where there is no minimum lot size required) In the hillside residential district, the allowable amount of buildable area resulting from the capacity factor calculation will constitute the adjusted net buildable area B Land Capacity Schedule 'Buildable Adjusted Net Slope Area in square Capacity Buildable Area Category feet Factor (square feet) 10 d X 100 = er Un percent X 75 0 = 10-14 9 . percent g g X 0 50 = 15.1 percent 4 g X 0 25 = P0.2 percent g X 0 025 = 25.29 percent t X 0 0 = 30+ percen Divided by Permitted minimum number of lot units size regwrement of underlying zoning distract except m Hillside Residential 'Bwldable area is a contiguous area of the lot which is less than thirty percent in natural slope or in the area determined, through environmental studies and investigation, as bwldable EXHIBIT B Q,R 3, T,U,V~~j~ C Exceptions The following land areas, meeting any or ail of the following criteria, shall not be included in the calculation of total allowable dwelling urnts 1 All land areas, regardless of slope, which will be subject to inundation during a one hundred year storm after development has occurred, 2 All land which is in a geologic hazard zone, as defined in the safety element of the general plan of the city, and for which no feasible mitigation measures are proposed, 3 4 • Q, R 3 T, U, V I S l All land area which lies within a federally recogrnzed blue Ime stream, or contains significant npanan or stream bed environs (Ord 416 § 6 (part), 1990) • RESOLUTION NO 06-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 8 LOTS FOR 206 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 21 ACRES OF LAND IN THE WESTERN FOOTHILL CORRIDOR MIXED USE AREA W ITHIN SUBAREA 1 OF THE FOOTHILL DISTRICTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-13, 01 AND 34 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearng on the application and concluded said hearng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Htll Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way, with a street frontage of 560 feet and lot depth of 620 feet, and is presently improved with an abandoned water reservoir, and b Properties to the north are developed with condominwms and single-faintly homes designated Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commercial uses East of the site is the abandoned Southem Pacific Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adtacent to the Medium Density residential development • 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows f1, R, S, T, U, V ~52 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 . a. The tentative tract map is designed in conformance with the Mixed Use Designation and Hillside Development Regulations as recommended for amendment, therefore, the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The tentative tract map design and conditions of approval for improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The tentative tract map and special studies included within the Initial Study demonstrate, the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d The tentative tract map and special studies included within the Initial Study support the design of the subdivision and demonstrate it is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems as demonstrated by the information contained within the Initial Study, and f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained m the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code • of Regulations Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ S'J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apn112,2006 . Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 is granted contingent upon approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 and Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 2) Subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of Development Review DRC2003-00637 and all applicable conditions thereto. Engineering Department 1) Dedicate Lot B to the City 2) Extend Master Plan Storm Drain Lme III-1 from its current terminus south of Foothill Boulevard (south of the Paafic Electric RR trail) to Red Hill Country Club Drive, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan factlities, in accordance with City policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted bythe City, all rights of the developerto reimbursement shall terminate a) Construct private, on-site storm drains to collect all project runoff and discharges from adjacent properties and convey to the Master Plan Storm Dram "Adjacent properties" include the redeveloped Sycamore Inn parking lot and other properties b) Final drainage study shall also determine the need for local storm drain facilities in Foothill Boulevard to maintain Oro 10-foot dry lanes, Ozs under top-of-curb, and O,~within right-of-way c) The Master Plan Storm Drain shall allow for City access to manholes Provide manholes at public-private junctions. 3) Proposed driveway entrance (street type) on Foothill Boulevard shall align with San Bernardino Road on the south side 4) Provide a driveway aisle from Foothill Boulevard to the condo project with three lanes one entry lane, 14 feet wide contmwng to the condo project, and two outbound lanes, one 14-foot right-tum and one 11-foot for through/left-turn lane and to extend from the condo project to Foothill Boulevard Q, R, S, T,U,V 1'j~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 4 5) Record an access easement across the Sycamore Inn property, from the signalized drive approach to the project entry, prior to final map approval If not successful, re-design the prolect to take right-turn-only access to Foothill from its own frontage (no median break) 6) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the ultimate nghts-of-way 7) Coordinate installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements with the City prolect 8) Modify the existing traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, as needed 9) Foothill Boulevard Parkway improvements, including special streetlights, street trees, sidewalk, and median, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard Distracts guidelines outlined in the Development Code and the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. 10) Make acontribution in-lieu of construction for the prorated share of the prolect for a future landscaped median on Foothill Boulevard. 11) On the Red Hiil Country Club Dnve frontage, install street improvements per the attached Standard Conditions, and per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Improvements shall extend from the prolect site north to loin those south of Calle Carabe for pedestrian traffic a) Vehicle access on Red Hill Country Club Dnve shall be emergency access only (not an "Exit Only" access) Drive approach shall be installed per Standard Drawing 105-C, with thicker concrete or reinforced sidewalk to meet Fire Distract standards b) The curb-adjacent sidewalk shall have a minimum 6-foot width, per City standards. Install retaining walls as required c) Provide 5,800 lumen streetlights along the frontage 12) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1 foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb, along all street frontages 13) On-site terminus to dnve aisle that ends at emergency access to Red Hili Country Ciub Dnve shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 14) Process a Lot Line Adjustment on the lot lines shared with the Sycamore Inn property so that they correspond with the proposed improvements and in particular, so that lot lines are at tops of slopes Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ S S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 5 15) Draining onto the Pacific Electric RR trail and the public right-of-way fronting Foothill Boulevard is not approved Provide private drainage facilities to direct flows to the Master Plan Storm Drain, including concrete ditch at the toe of the 2 1 slope along the property Ime 16) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) from the protect site to the south side of Foothtll Boulevard and the overhead utilities from the protect site to the pole 120 feet north of the site shall be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 17) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) dated June 17, 2005, has been conceptually reviewed and the following items need to be completed a) Section 1 2 -Provide permit numbers [List Tract, PMT# and W DID#] b) Section 2 1 -Provide source for Mill Creek (Hydrologic Unit No 801 24) c) Section 3 2 -Check Section numbers for Section 3 2, 3 3, and 34 d) Section 3 2 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream " e) Section 3 2 -Roof Runoff Controls (SD-11) Provide source for comment that "Infiltration practices are not recommended m San Bernardino County due to potential impact to groundwater resources " f) Section 3 3 -Bacteria and Viruses should be a "yes" since they are expected/potential pollutants of concern g) Section 4 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream " h) Section 6 -Notarize and record the City's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" (Copies • are available at Engineering's front counter) Q R S T,U,VI~JI~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 6 i) Plan Review -Locate proposed Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan 18) Maintenance of BMPs identified m the WQMP shall be addressed m the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restriction (CC&Rs) Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers" specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the foliowmg provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended perods of time Schedule activities to minimiie the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material m accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Q, R, S, T,U,VIS~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 7 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB]) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading lans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when p not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping. B~olog~cal Resources 1) In accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a tree preservation and replacement program based on the following prionties will be submitted and approved by the City Planner pnor to the issuance of grading permits 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot bepreserved-in-place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available Cultural Resources 1) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take • appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , Q, R, S, T, U, V ~S [~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 8 paleontological monitoring) that may be appropnate Where mitigation • monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modfication wdhout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County • Archaeological Information Center for permanent archroing 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropnate depository (i.e ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ S I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Aprii 12, 2006 • Page 9 Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce (PM,o) emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403, or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) Fill slopes 30 feet or less in height should have a keyway toe (a speaal backfilled excavation, which is constructed beneath the toe area of a planned fill slope on sloping ground to improve the stability of the • slope) Fill slopes greater than 30 feet in height should have a keyway width equal to one-half the slope height with a depth of 5 feet at the keyway toe All keyways should be tilted a minimum of 2 percent towards the back of the keyway. 6) Backcuts for stabilized slopes 30 feet or less in height should be excavated at a 2 1 gradient Backcuts for stabilized slopes greater than 30 feet m height can be excavated at gradients up to 1.5 1 provided the fill at the top of these slopes is at least 15 feet thick. All stabilized slopes should be constructed and drained in accordance with the specfications and details m Appendix H of the Geotechmcal Investigation and Fault Study (specifications 5 50 thru 5 57) Adherence to these design specifications would ensure stable construction slopes 7) For residences, setbacks from bottom outer edges of foundations, walls, etc adjacent atop-of-slope should be setback from the slope face a horizontal distance of one-third the slope height under consideration in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code The horizontal distance should not be less than 5 feet 8) Buildings adjacent the toe of a slope should be set back a honzontal distance equal tonne-half the vertical height of the slope in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code with minimum and maximum setbacks of 3 feet and 15 feet, respectively r 1 u Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ (p O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apni 12, 2006 Page 10 9) Ail slopes should be landscaped with drought resistant vegetation. A • landscape architect should be consulted for recommendations on appropriate plant types and planting configuration 10) Interim measures should be considered to protect the slopes prior to the establishment of landscaping These measures may include the utilization of geotechnical erosion fabrics or acceptable alternatives 11) Drainage devices should be inspected and maintained at regular intervals and should not be obstructed. 12) The slopes should be periodically inspected for the presence of burrowing rodents If an infestation of burrowing rodents is confirmed, they should be eliminated from the slopes 13) Provisions should be made to interrupt automatic timing devices of irrigation systems during the rainy seasons. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Actiwt~es• 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Bwlding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices • (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed prolect that identifies speafic measures tocontrol on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a mirnmum. a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to mirnmize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this prolect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site • Q, R, s, r,u,v1C~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 11 5) It shall be the hired contractor's responsibility to inspect and maintain all BMPs in good working order Inspection and maintenance responsibility shall remain for the duration of the project Post-Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified m the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Hall and Foreman, Inc dated May 2004 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The • WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 g) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State W ater Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the W aste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly nose level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Planning • Department. Said consultant shalt report theirfindings to the Planning Department within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning (~ R, S, T, U, V ` In 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-38 SUBTT16605 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 12 Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 5) Once bwlding plans are submitted for permits, an mtenor noise analysis shall be done for bwldings in this protect to determine the type of budding materials to be used to ensure that bwidings meet mtenor noise standards of 45dB CNEL. 6) Noise barriers should be constructed around the patios and balconies of the bwldmgs along the southern portion of the protect site, adtacent to Foothill Boulevard The first floor patio barriers shall be 5 1/2 feet in • height and the second and third floor balcony barriers shall be 5 0 feet in height 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. Q, R S, T, U, V 1193 l__J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Vanance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use m implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared m compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 1 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This • procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 1 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept m the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following . address Q, R, S, T, U, V L ~ y MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 3 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 4 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 5 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible forapproving any such refinements oradditions An MMP Reporting Form wail be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational • personnel 6 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 7 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 8 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits • Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~ S • s • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00339, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2004-00352, TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637, VARIANCE DRC2005-01061, MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 Applicant: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Initial Study Prepared by: Larry Henderson Date: March 8. 2006 fJ --I C r .. •. •. ~. _ _ _ All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equpment ~s being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction sde for Cdy venticatron Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible far the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2l4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1106 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD 60 C Review of plans AIC 2~4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans A/C 2~4 through seeding and watering 1 of 10 fJ --I C ~ ,. ~ .. . . .. Pave or apply gravel to any on-sde haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time Schedule activdies to minimize the amounts of exposed BO C Review of plans A/C 2l4 excavated soil during and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance BO C Review of plans A 4 with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by BO C Dunng A 4 the City rf silt is carved over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operatwns dunng high winds (i a ,wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 construction requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction sudable means ' The site shall be treated with water or other sod- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use ~ ~'° i • ~ i . .. . . ... .. . _ All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2l4 regwred to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2l4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping BwlogicalResources,~ ~ -~ _ ~ _ '''" ,+ - _ In accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a CP B/C AIC/D AIC 2l4 tree preservation and replacement program based on the following priorities will be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved-in-place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available Cultural Resources , - - • - - -- - -~ ~ --- Y ' If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the - developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to mondor _ construction activities, to take appropriate measures to ~ protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specfic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitgation mondonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites CPIBO C Review of report AID 3l4 from demolition or significant modification wdhout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation CPIBO C Review of report AID 3l4 of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's CPIBO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage _~ 7: U' -~ C r Q 3 of 10 p u. C 6 .. .. .. ~. ~. .. Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3l4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the pro/ect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report AID 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological mondonng) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped CP B Review of report AID 4 to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval > of earth-disturbing actvities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or BO B/C Review of report AID 4 graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate ail recovered fossils for CP O Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) 4 of 10 • fJ _~ C C • C~ .. ... . .. ... . .. ~. .. .. Geology and Sods' ~ ~'' - -, _ - ='' - - - '~~ - The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce Fme Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403, or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Durng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactwe construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Fill slopes 30 feel or less in height should have a BO C During A 4 ' keyway toe (a speaal backfdled excavation, which is construction I constructed beneath the toe area of a planned fill slope on sloping ground to improve the stability of the slope) Fill slopes greater than 30 feet in height should have a keyway width equal to one-half the slope height with a depth of 5 feet at the keyway toe All keyways should be tilted a minimum of 2 percent towards the back of the keyway Backcuts for stabilized slopes 30 feet or less ,n height BO C During A 4 should be excavated at a 2 1 gradient Backcuts for construction stabilized slopes greater than 30 feet m height can be excavated at gradients up to 1 5 1 provided the fdl at the top of these slopes is at least 15 feet thick All stabilized slopes should be constructed and drained in accordance with the speafications and details in Appendix H of the Geotechnical Investigation and Fault Study (speaf~cations 5 50 thru 5 57) Adherence to these design speafications would ensure stable construction slopes 5 of 10 fJ C J .. ... ~. ~. .. For residences, setbacks from bottom outer edges of BO C Dunng A 4 foundations, walls, etc adjacent a top-of-slope should construction be setback from the slope face a horizontal distance of one-thud the slope height under consideration in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Budding Code The horizontal distance should not be less than 5 feet Bwldings adjacent the toe of a slope should be set back BO C During A 4 a horizontal distance equal tonne-half the vertical height construction of the slope in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code with minimum and maximum setbacks of 3 feet and 15 feet, respectively All slopes should be landscaped with drought resistant BO/CP B Plan Check and AIC 2/3 vegetation A landscape archdect should be consulted During for recommendations on appropriate plant types and construction planting configuration Interim measures should be considered to protect the BOICP BIC Plan Check and AIC 2/3 slopes prior to the establishment of landscaping These Dunng measures may include the utilization of geotechnical construction erosion fabrics or acceptable alternatives Dramage devices should be mspected and maintained BO C On-going A 3/4 at regular intervals and should not be obstructed The slopes should be periodically inspected for the BO C On-going A 5 presence of burrowing rodents If an infestation of burrowing rodents is confirmed, they should be eliminated from the slopes Provisions should be made to interrupt automatic timing BO B C A 3 devices of irrigation systems during the rainy seasons .Hydrologyand Water Quality s- ,' `. ~ -s. ~ - ~-,. ~ <, ~ ~ ~' :. ~ - Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO BIC/D Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical • ~10 . fJ to C J 1J • • ~. .. Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in An BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actrodies are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff Durng construction, to remove pollutants, street BO BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site It shall be the hired contractor's responsibility to inspect CE B/CID Review of plans AIC 2/4 and maintain all BMPs in good working order Inspection and maintenance responsibility shall remain for the duration of the protect The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE BICID Review of plans AIC 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Hall and Foreman, Inc dated May 2004 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7of10 (J C _J .. .. .. ~. • ~. .. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerslpesticides/herbiades Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to i ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise- . ,. a v~,.W<~„=,~ ~,r~,.. ,,,. .,., .. .,, r. ~,~• ., , ~ ~ between the Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During A 4 hours of S 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday • ~10 . fJ C J -~. • C~ ~ .. ~ .. ~. . ~. . Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Department Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the POIBO C During A 4/7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Nose Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Once bwlding plans are submitted for permits, an CP B Plan check C 2 interior noise analysis shall be done for bwldings in this project to determine the type of bwlding materials to be used to ensure that bwldings meet interior noise standards of 45dB CNEL Noise barriers should be constructed around the patios CP B/D Plan check and AIC 2l3 and balconies of the bwldings along the southern portion Final inspection of the project site, adjacent to Foothill Boulevard The first Floor patio barriers shall be 5 1/2 feet in height and the second and thud floor balcony barriers shall be 5 0 feet in height 9of10 Key to Checklist Abbrevlatrons Responsible Person=_ ~;:: ° ~~; ~^~,~:'_~= + ~ ~ ?.Monltoring,Frequency ~=_~,~'~ ;Method.ofrVerifcation~= '',%F;' tip? ,~'~~',';~ ~ :Sanctlons~ :r ~? '- - - - - CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Reconfadon of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit CE - Crty Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWCtion C -Plan Check 3 - W dhhold Certdicate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies) Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - Citatwn G~ _~ _~ C ._..t • 1~ 10 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16606 SUBJECT: SYCAMORE VILLAS APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES NORTHSIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE LOCATION: AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date ~. General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or to the attemative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/~_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 2 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 3 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the ~_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~ Protect No SJBTT16605 Completion Date 4 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be . provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 5 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property -/~- owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 6 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all -/~_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for communityconcems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) t The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on -/-/- this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the prolect The applicant is responsible for the cost of _J-/- implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requved to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $475 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used by the City to • retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/~- communitytrails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentatve map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from -/~- street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard prolect site and Sycamore Inn Frontaoe -J-/- 30 total feet on Red Hill Country Club Drive ~-/- 3 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except far -/-/- approved openings Red Hill Country Club Drive 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by -!-/- deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved Q, R, S, T,U,V ~~~ Protect No SUBTT16605 Completion Date 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring toint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC 8 R's or • deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 7 Easements for public sidewalks trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 8 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained bythe City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Master Plan Storm Drain south of Foothill Boulevard G. L J Street Improvements Ail public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted bythe City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or umt, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to s Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard, protect X X (c) (e) X X (d) (f) site and Sycamore Inn (9) frontage (h) G) Red Hlll Country Club X X X X X X (g) Dnve Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Street type (f) ADA access ramps (g) Necessary drainage facilities (h) Depending on school district requirements, provide a bus bay Westbound Foothill Boulevard east of drive entrance, dedicated additional right-of-way as necessary (i) Modify traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road Improvement Plans and Construction / / -/-/- / / -/-/- _/_J_ -/-/- _/~_ Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ -~ 6 Prgect No SUBTT76605 Comolehon Dete a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Cary Engineer 2) Condwt shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Cary Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ 1 -/-~- • _/-l- -~-~- ~~- ~~. -/J- • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • Protect No SUBTT76605 Completion Date 6 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape Improvement plans The City Engmeer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Protect Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Spaee Spaemg Size oty Foothill Boulevard in Prunus X N C N 3 ft 20' O C informal 15 gal Fill in ROW and Median Blveiana groupings not more than 25 % of total frontage trees Foothill Boulevard on- Platanus London Plane 8 tt s- Sp~ce st 75 gal site acerifolia Tree O C su ested 99 Foothill Country Club Platanus London Plane 8 k 30' O C 75 gal Drive acerifolia Tree Construction Notes for Street Trees t) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project • intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required H. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard Drainage and Flood Control 1 The protect (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Clty Engineer 2 It shall be the developer's responsibilltyto have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection faculties sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraullc calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the Clty Engineer _/-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~~- Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ Prgect No SU8TT16605 Comoletion Date 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the I _/~- property from adtacent areas 5 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_. from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk J. Utilities 7 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary ~-/- 2 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the _/_J- Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compilance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdrnsion or prior to the Issuance of permits In the case of all other residential protects 3 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies involved _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them K. General Requirements and Approvals 1 The separate parcels contained within the protect boundaries shall be legally combined Into one ~_/- parcel prior to Issuance of building permits 2 An easement for a toint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of ~_/_ bulding permits, whichever occurs first, for . 3 Permits shall be obtained from the following agenaes for work within then right of-way San _/_/~ Bernardino Area Government 4 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 5 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall ~~_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from and appropriate documentation is provided to the Clty Form CD-1 shall be submitted to landfills , the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Q, R, S, T~ U, V ~ ~~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS July 14, 2004 Charles Joseph & Assoaates Cameo/Sycamore Town Homes N/S foothill Blvd between San Bernardino & Baker DRC2003-00637 & SUBTT16605 MFR complex THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The public water supply must be tested by CVWD at the point of connection. The test must be conducted prior to the issuance of permits for the Commercial or Condominium buildings in the development. The water supply must meet or exceed the minimum fire flow requirement for the most demanding building. All Structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers "thought-out" in accordance to • NFPA 13. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants. The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet c Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fue hydrants are' At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwldmg. • Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~ 2 If any portion of a faality or bwlding is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided e. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subtect to Fire District rewew and approval. Private fire hydrants on adtacent property shall not be used to provde requued fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Bwldmg permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for rewew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and the approved RCFPD alternative method require that all structures in this development be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers m accordance to NFPA 13 "Fully Sprinklered" FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1 Per the approved alternative method all sprinkler systems in this development must be monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwldmg Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a bwlding permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 • • 2 Q, R, S, T, U, V ~S~ FSC-6 Fire District Site Access • Fire Distract access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1S' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are• a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radws shall be 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. • h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscape access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all regwred building exterior openings 5 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed m accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design regwrements apply. a All automatic gates shall be provided with a .Fue Distract approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire Distract Knox Key Switch • c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adfacent to the gate for use m the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate 3 Q, R, S, T, U, V ) ~jy d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall • automatically reset 6 Fire Lane Identification• Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: The approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the fudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Public Assembly, LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles m Assembly Buddmgs Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures, Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement: The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, bwlding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m • the submittal 4 Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~S a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties • included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subtect to the agreement c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a required pnvate fire mains or appurtenances a. Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line; or c Provide service to adtacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation; or e Is shared by multiple owners. Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. ~i1 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any bulding permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the . locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and 5 Q, R, S, T,U,V )t~J'(o witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4. Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwlding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers• All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- sitefire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow m accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service. 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be mstalled, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. w 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire • Construction Services 6 o, R, s, T,u,v ~a1 8 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fue access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 9 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciaUindustrial and multr family bwldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial bwldings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • Q, R, S, T, U, V ~ ~ g RESOLUTION NO 06-39 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 FOR 206 CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-13, 31 AND 34 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Development Review DRC2003-00637, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of Apnl 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows • 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on Apnl 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports including public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows 3 The application applies to the property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way, with a street frontage of 560 feet and lot depth of 620 feet, and is presently improved with an abandoned water reservoir, and 4 Properties to the north are developed with condominiums and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commercial uses East of the site is the abandoned Southem Pacific Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commercial to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adjacent to the Medwm Density residential development 5 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 • and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows Q, R, S, T, U, ~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 a Subject to the amendment of the Hillside Provisions of the General Plan the Mixed • Use designated Project has demonstrated through the plans, Initial Study, and conditions of Approval that the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and b Subject to the amendment of the Hillside Provisions of the Development Code, the Mixed Use designated project has demonstrated through the plans, Initial Study, and Conditions of Approval that the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Mixed Use designation and Hillside Regulations as recommended for amendment in the Development Code, and d The Mixed Use designed project has demonstrated through the plans, Initial Study, and Conditions of Approval that the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vianity. 6. Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the • findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as conditions of approval. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 7 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Q, R, S, T,U,V ~9~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 Page 3 • Plamm~a Department 1) Approval of Development Review DRC2003-00637 is granted contingent upon approval of Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, and Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 2) Subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of Development Review DRC2003-00637 and all applicable conditions thereto 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082 is hereby approved subject to replacement planting per the mitigation measures Eng ineering Department 1) Dedicate Lot B to the City 2) Extend Master Plan Storm Drain Line III-1 from its current terminus south of Foothill Boulevard (south of the Pacific Electric RR trail) to Red Hill Country Ciub Dnve, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy The • developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a) Construct private, on-site storm drains to collect all prolect runoff and discharges from adjacent properties and convey to the Master Plan Storm Dram. "Adjacent properties" include the redeveloped Sycamore Inn parking lot and other properties b) Final drainage study shall also determine the need for local storm drain facilities in Foothill Boulevard to maintain Qio 10-foot dry lanes, Ozsundertop-of-curb, and O,oowithin nght-of-way c) The Master Plan Storm Drain shall allow for City access to manholes Provide manholes at public-pnvate junctions 3) Proposed driveway entrance (street type) on Foothill Boulevard shall align with San Bernardino Road on the south side. 4) Provide a driveway aisle from Foothill Boulevard to the condo prolect with three lanes one entry lane, 14 feet wide continuing to the condo prolect, and two outbound lanes, one 14 foot nght-turn and one 11-foot for through/left-turn lane and to extend from the condo prolect to Foothill Boulevard Q, R, S, T,U,V Ian PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 4 5) Record an access easement across the Sycamore Inn property, from the signalized drive approach to the prolect entry, prior to final map approval If not successful, re-design the prolect to take right-turn-only access to Foothill from its own frontage (no median break). 6) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the ultimate rights-of-way 7) Coordinate installation of Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements wdh the City prolect. 8) Modify the existing traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, as needed 9) Foothill Boulevard Parkway improvements, including speaal streetlights, street trees, sidewalk, and median, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard Districts gwdelines outlined in the Development Code and the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan 10) Make a contribution in-lieu of construction for the prorated share of the prolect for a future landscaped median on Foothill Boulevard • 11) On the Red Hill Country Club Drive frontage, install street . improvements per the attached Standard Conditions, and per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Improvements shall extend from the prolect site north to loin those south of Calle Carabe for pedestrian traffic a) Vehicle access on Red Hili Country Club Drive shall be emergency access only (not an "Exit Only" access.) Drive approach shall be installed per Standard Drawing 105-C, with thicker concrete or reinforced sidewalk to meet Fve Distract standards b) The curb-adjacent sidewalk shall have a minimum 6-foot width, per City standards Install retaining walls as regwred. c) Provide 5,800 lumen streetlights along the frontage. 12) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1 foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb, along all street frontages 13) On-site terminus to drive aisle that ends at emergency access to Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 14) Process a Lot Line Adjustment on the lot Imes shared with the Sycamore Inn property so that they correspond with the proposed improvements and m particular, so that lot Imes are at tops of slopes Q, R, S, T, U, v ~ ~ Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 5 15) Draining onto the Pacific Electric Rail Road trail and the public right-of-way fronting Foothill Boulevard is not approved Provide private drainage facilities to direct flows to the Master Plan Storm Drain, including concrete ditch at the toe of the 2 1 slope along the property Ime 16) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) from the protect site to the south side of Foothill Boulevard and the overhead utilities from the protect site to the pole 120 feet north of the site shall be undergrounded, priorto public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 17) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) dated June 17, 2005, has been conceptually reviewed and the following items need to be completed • a) Section 1.2 -Provide permit numbers [List Tract, PMT# and W DID#] b) Section 2 1 -Provide source for Mill Creek (Hydrologic Unit No 801 24) c) Section 3 2 -Check Section numbers for Section 3 2, 3.3, and 3.4 d) Section 3 2 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream." e) Section 3 2 -Roof Runoff Controls (SD-11) Provide source for comment that "Infiltration practices are not recommended in San Bernardino County due to potential impact to groundwater resources " f) Section 3 3 -Bacteria and Viruses should be a "yes" since they are expected/potential pollutants~of concern g) Section 4 -The City of Rancho Cucamonga Catch Basin Labeling Standard is "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Down Stream " • h) Section 6 -Notarize and record the City's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Pian" (Copies are available at Engineering's front counter) Q, R, S, T,U,V Ict 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 6 • i) Plan Review -Locate proposed Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan. 18) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WOMP shall be addressed in the protect Covenants, Conditions, and Restriction (CC&Rs) Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction egwpment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers" specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed bythe South Coast Air Quality Management District • (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff. 3) Ali paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule actroities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Q, R, s, r, u, v ~ q `~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 7 • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dadyto reduce Fme Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible. • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading h en plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment w not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) Ail residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping B~olog~cal Resources 1) In accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a tree preservation and replacement program based on the following priorities will be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits 1) preserve-m-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot bepreserved-in-place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available Cultural Resources 1) If any paleontological resource (i.e plant or animal fossils) are . encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also prowde Q, R, S, T,U,V IC1.S PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 8 specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., • paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to requve incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources • within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing actiwties Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for • documentation m the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum). Q, R, S, T,U,V lib PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 9 ILJ Geology and Sotls 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403, or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) Fill slopes 30 feet or less in height should have a keyway toe (a special backfilled excavation, which is constructed beneath the toe area of a planned fill slope on sloping ground to improve the stability of the • slope) Fill slopes greater than 30 feet in height should have a keyway width equal to one-half the slope height with a depth of 5 feet at the keyway toe All keyways should be tilted a minimum of 2 percent towards the back of the keyway 6) Backcuts for stabilized slopes 30 feet or less in height should be excavated at a 2 1 gradient Backcuts for stabilized slopes greater than 30 feet m height can be excavated at gradients up to 1.5 1 provided the fill at the top of these slopes is at least 15 feet thick All stabilized slopes should be constructed and drained m accordance with the specifications and details in Appendix H of the Geotechnical Investigation and Fault Study (speafications 5 50 thru 5 57) Adherence to these design specifications would ensure stable construction slopes 7) For residences, setbacks from bottom outer edges of foundations, walls, etc adjacent a top-of-slope should be setback from the slope face a horizontal distance of one-third the slope height under consideration in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Bwlding Code. The horizontal distance should not be less than 5 feet. 8) Buildings adjacent the toe of a slope should be set back a horizontal distance equal tonne-half the vertical height of the slope m accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code with minimum and maximum setbacks of 3 feet and 15 feet, respectively. • 9) All slopes should be landscaped with drought resistant vegetation. A landscape architect should be consulted for recommendations on appropriate plant types and planting configuration Q, R, S, T,U,V ~`'1~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 10 10) Interim measures should be considered to protect the slopes prior to the establishment of landscaping These measures may include the utilization of geotechnical erosion fabrics or acceptable alternatives. 11) Drainage devices should be inspected and maintained at regular intervals and should not be obstructed 12) The slopes should be periodically inspected for the presence of burrowing rodents If an infestation of burrowing rodents is confirmed, they should be eliminated from the slopes 13) Provisions should be made to interrupt automatic timing devices of irrigation systems during the rainy seasons Hydrology and Water Quality r~ ~J Construction AcGviGes 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum • extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced m southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning wdl be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) It shall be the hired contractor's responsibility to inspect and maintain all BMPs in good working order Inspection and maintenance • responsibility shall remain for the duration of the protect. Q ~~ S, T, U, V ~ ~ fS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 11 • Post-Constructon OperaLonal 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Hall and Foreman, Inc dated May 2004 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiades/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June • 2004 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall _ obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified m Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified m Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Plamm~g Department Said consultant shall reporttheirfmdingstothePlanning Department within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Plamm~g Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then . construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted Q,~ s r,u,v ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-39 DRC2003-00637 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 12 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m the first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6:30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 5) Once budding plans are submitted for permits, an interior noise analysis shall be done for buildings in this protect to determine the type of building materials to be used to ensure that buildings meet interior noise standards of 45dB CNEL. 6) Noise barriers should be constructed around the patios and balconies of the buildings along the southern portion of the protect site, adtacent to Foothill Boulevard The first floor patio barriers shall be 5 1/2 feet m height and the second and thud floor balcony barriers shall be 5.0 feet in height • 8 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS r1 LJ Q, R, S, T, U, V 2-C~(7 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC2003-00637, Vanance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 This Mitigaton Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements p o eidure necessaryltohensure complcanceigThenmitigationsmeasurerconditons of approvadl are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 1 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This . procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. plane ermass geed by the City P anneirl, shall ooordinategenfolrcement oftthepMMPt The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 1 coMespond ngrtmitgigation melasueePdentfiedf nrthe Mit gateoniMlon tonng Checkl stcatta hed hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address Q,R~S'T'~'v 2~1 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2004-00339, -00352\SUBTT16605\DRC2003-00637\DRC2005-01061\DRC2004-00826 April 12, 2006 Page 2 • City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 2 Appropnate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the protect planner 3 The pro/ect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forrn After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development 4 as omP etedob I the pro ect r iannePor respons ble City departhment at the bottombof the MMP p Y 1 P Reporting Form 5 Unanticipated circumstances may anse requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 6 constucti nclontractors f Pomphance' wth any aspects of theuMMP tnottoccumng after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupanaes if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 7 respons bdity of he'tCityfof Rancho Cucamonga Planning DvisiontThe Divas on shall) requhe the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred penod of time 8 In those instances regwnng long-term project monitonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation actvities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The CommurntyrDevellopment D relcto~or CitytPlannerlpnor to the ssuancle of bu ding perrmts e \_J Q, R, S, T, U, ~ Zc~Z • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2004-00339. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2004-00352, TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16605. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637. VARIANCE DRC2005-01061 MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 Applicant: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Initial Study Prepared by: Larry Henderson Date: March 8, 2006 iJJ -i C N .. . . .. ... . . AirQu811tj!",';v*s:"~.;'`'~`Sr~~rl";~''~'`:'~"";`,q~" `q` ; -,~ '„: ^^ ~~ ~ '~`~• •t~ ~~'y •. ~~ s d ~ Wi't`' ~ t` .. r ~ ~'I 'r "`9S "7k F:' 7 ia: e + ~ .yy ~ G. s. ~"~. :eT .. _ . ~, Lti r: .° r., ,. a ',xJ`~ i'ai :+e 9~.` ~ .,t- .~,^., w~._, .. , ~'i_ ~t~e~.~ - All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CPIBO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment wtll be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and ccatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering 1 of 10 (J 7J C N O L ... ~. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2l4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 excavated soil during and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance BO C Review of plans A 4 wdh local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by BO C During A 4 the Cdy if silt is carved over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations durng high words (i a ,wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 construction requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods BO C Dunng A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB)) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Rewew of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel-powered equpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use • ~f 10 • • All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 2/4 regwred to incorporate high efficiencyllow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 214 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping .BiologlcahResotJrdes, ;~~, ~_e`- „r .~-.~ .",~~. ~~-~~- .u~.~'u'~L SitV ~It ~~'~l ~~~ • ~. til,~ ~ .S:w Y ~ i : ~-;x,~,,~a, .w r} ;,'+~' ~'- ?.~f. 7 ti y ~ ~ r ~~ yy l 5Y{ ~ ` ~ ~1 ~~~}`.~ ~a ~ ~ e .'k, < _ ti. ~ ,;t "`, . ~~: v ~ ~ e . 'it+'' Rn t'' 'if 1 •1..Y 5 J?~.i,-TYL'S'~w - ~ { l,,+ h ignl Y^, , M ~M t1S .'f~. '£"`•nr ^S. s 4'. ~~tii~~ , , (- ~nZ: In accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a CP BIC AICID AIC 2/4 fray nraearvafinn anri ronlacamanf nrnnram haeeri nn fJ 7J C N C ~~ the following priorities will be submitted and approved by the Cely Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved-in-place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available r,, ~. 4-,.ti ^: u..' iim ~e• ., ~- , e y,, 't•; l'~ a',. ; y'~':s'.~ ~ =,Culttiral:ReSdtirces;X `~„>,a~ +- s Ts•~"a'~ : ` :~(efK,4;~ t'~' ; - , i:.?~. "a"k ~" ~ ~ ~ r•`.v p.,., d '(;° ~.;~.~'~~.~~~~ • yP, 1~ ry eY ."'m:~'~'fe $?`,~-, ? 1~:x~`~'c{ ~~Y„ 7 ' ' - yi'wt`g,a~ :~~;~ ~`.;, ~ ~, ~'~' ~. , , _ . . . y*~,p~.....+-,+ mq•,..,r. 3,.~~. ?' .y~, r ...'i ;_'x:.K .r~{,..~ ?ti !.`i<bz... _.f°i. , , -""lar _ +m`.. . !+ ..L:.. ~~ 3;• 4 r If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Enact interim measures to protect undes~gnated sites CP/BO C Review of report AID 3l4 from demolition or significant modification wdhout an opportunely for the City to establish its archaeological value Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation CPIBO C Review of report AID 3/4 of archaeological sites within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage 3 of 10 Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report AID 314 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report AID 314 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources wthin the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archmng If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal CP B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor ~ construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist { shall submit a report of findings that will also provide = specfic recommendations regarding further mitigation - measures (i a ,paleontological monitoring) that maybe ~ appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, ~ the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped CP B Review of report AID 4 to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or BO B/C Review of report AID 4 graded, divert earth-disturbing actvities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for CP D Review of report D 3 documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) fJ S u • • 10 • fJ 77 N _~ C Q .. .. ~. -. - .. 'Geblb ~ ~r,d,SSon`s° t~r;~~j~ -~yY~~, ~ 9Y`e, ~:di"t "~~~:hY~- ~.,Y;i L°ry~'3 , s,nYJS ~ :~~y'~,~iy~w ~ :.. ~1v. *RR~' ~.y~g~~7 - >•' •v' ~ Y~r tj ~~~ ~ry~7~~..:1. *~~~;,;~~~~as;~,:>; j~ 1>+~"cJ~ t: , The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C Dunng A 4 slabdizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) construction daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403, or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-sde Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site during such episodes Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C Dunng A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions Fill slopes 30 feet or less in height should have a BO C Dunng A 4 keyway toe (a speaal backfilled excavation, which is construction constructed beneath the toe area of a planned fill slope on sloping ground to improve the stability of the slope) Fill slopes greater than 30 feet in height should have a keyway width equal to one-half the slope height with a depth of 5 feet at the keyway toe All keyways should be tilted a minimum of 2 percent towards the back of the keyway Backcuts for stabilized slopes 30 feet or less m height BO C Dunng A 4 should be excavated at a 2 1 gradient Backcuts for construction stabilized slopes greater than 30 feet rn height can be excavated at gradients up to 1 5 1 provided the fill at the top of these slopes is at least 15 feet thick All stabilized slopes should be constructed and drained in accordance with the specifications and details in Appendix H of the Geotechnical Investigation and Fault Study (specfications 5 50 thru 5 57) Adherence to these design specifications would ensure stable construction slopes 5of10 £~ 7J -I C .. .. ~ ~. .. . .. For residences, setbacks from bottom outer edges of BO C During A 4 foundations, walls, etc adfacent atop-of-slope should construction be setback from the slope face a horizontal distance of one-third the slope height under consideration in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Budding Code The horizontal distance should not be less than 5 feet Buildings adfacent the toe of a slope should beset back BO C During A 4 a horizontal distance equal to one-half the vertical height construction of the slope in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code with minimum and maximum setbacks of 3 feet and 15 feet, respectively All slopes should be landscaped with drought resistant BOICP B Plan Check and AIC 2l3 vegetation A landscape architect should be consulted During for recommendations on appropriate plant types and construction planting configuration Interim measures should be considered to protect the BO/CP BIC Plan Check and A/C 2l3 slopes prior to the establishment of landscaping These During measures may include the utilization of geotechrncal construction erosion fabrics or acceptable alternatives Drainage devices should be inspected and maintained BO C On-going A 3/4 at regular intervals and should not be obstructed The slopes should be periodically inspected for the BO C On-going A 5 presence of burrowing rodents If an infestation of burrowing rodents is confirmed, they should be eliminated from the slopes Provisions should be made to interrupt automatic timing BO B C A 3 devices of vngation systems during the rainy seasons aHydp ! Y d' te~~Clilali ~~~. err"' ;~%~ ??'yy~~~~ t~ Sr~~ ~ .y, a'k`t~'S ~ r~Y -~aYu '~n~'w'~~^:b ~}r~: 'by w ~ ~ r~Lr-~':c~k ~t~'~ q. -~..,la(~ i~`uL'~3G°~$ K r ,r .~' ;lq r ~ ~, 1i~-r Y;:zy"i '"r1'k;;:^'~Sk;..r,;~. A fie.. Nw 2~;,,,Zm~.t~,t~, "yi4, ~ Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to Buldng Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical • ~ 10 . • fJ -i C N .. .. ~ .. ~ An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO ~. B/CID Review of plans . AIC .. . 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the dine of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame During construction, temporary berms such as BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site It shall be the hired contractor's responsibility to inspect CE 8/C/D Review of plans A/C 2l4 and maintain all BMPs in good working order Inspection and maintenance responsibd~ty shall remain for the duration of the protect The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Hall and Foreman, Inc dated May 2004 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7of10 C ~_ d Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pestiadeslherbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Pnor to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall CE submit to the City Engineer for approval a WOMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004 Pnor to issuance of grading or pawng permits, the BO applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the NPDES General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State W ater Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the Cdy Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit ac BIC/D ~ Rewew of plans ~ AIC AIC 214 Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday • ~f 10 -~ C N • .. ... -. . ~ ~. .. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level moneloring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Department Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actiwhes shall be reduced in intensely to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C Dunng A A as possible in the first phase construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4l7 hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Once building plans are submelted for permits, an CP B Plan check C 2 interior noise analysis shall be done for bwldings in this protect to determine the type of building materials to be used to ensure that buildings meet interior noise standards of 45dB CNEL Noise barriers should be constructed around the patios CP BID Plan check and A/C 2/3 and balconies of the buildings along the southern portion Final inspection of the protect site, adtacent to Foothill Boulevard The first Floor patio barriers shall be 5 112 feet in height and the second and third Floor balcony barriers shall be 5 0 feet in height 9 of 10 Key to Checklist Abbreviations ~13ea ons bl~'P~`~son P, ...~, ..3 r__ .e.. .,,, ,..~.. ~ ~ - u'~, ito ~9~~e~~e ~Y. ~ ~ P ~ < fsis r, ~* r ,~l~ ~a $ CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development . A - On-site Inspection ~ F, „ , . .. : »., : . 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B - Other Agenq Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Bwlding Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chiet or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation fJ -~ C N • 1Qof 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-00637 SUBJECT: SYCAMORE VILLAS APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES NORTHSIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN REDHILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND LOCATION: SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at Its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-39, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to ail parties involved in the construction/grading actmties and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development ~ The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code . regulations, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Comolehon Date -/-/- / I I / / / Q, R, S, T, U, V X13 Project No DRC2003-00637 Comoletion Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, ail Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as ail Uniform Building Code and _/_/_• State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 A detatled on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/~_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwlding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, ail trash pick-up shall be for individual units with ~~_ all receptacles shielded from public view 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For smgle- • family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10 All bulding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/~_ homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 12 The project contains a designated Historical Landmark Any further modifications to the site _/~_ including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of bwldings or structures, or changes to the site, shall regwre a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval 13 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all ~_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for communityconcems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 14 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 15 For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as requved by the ~~_ Development Code 16 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space _/~~ shall be provided Q, R, S, T, U, V '~~ Protect No DRC2003-00637 Comolehon Date 17 For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the . Development Code 1 S Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers maybe manufactured products D. Building Design 1 An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of egwvalent capacity and efficiency All swimming pools installed at the time of initial p ansoand sha I be submPtted foreC ~tPlanneheeview aDndaapprovlabpnorl tot he ssuancel of building permits 2 Plandner andtBu ding Offnc a~rev ew and app oval prior to s trance of bwld rig permits for City 3 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the budding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 albuading, watlc suppolrt co umnt orl other obst utction, thehspacelshall be apminimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape Islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-Inch walk adtacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 throughoutetdhetdevelopment to connect dwel rigs/umts/bwld rigs twithaopen spaces plaaas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 hhs s to un ess they are the pn do opal sotu~ce of tra sportat on ftorrthe ownerrand proh bit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated wsitor parking areas 6 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provde adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- -/-/- _/~- ~-/- ~-/- F. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commeraal, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential protects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces W arehouse distribution uses shall provide btcycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Q, R, S, T, U, V Z~-j Project No DRC2003-00637 Completion Date G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and urigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_. the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdiwsion 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in ~_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within ~_/_ the protect 0% - 48-inch box or larger 10% - 36-inch box or larger, 10 % - 24-inch box or larger, 80% - 15-gallon, and 0% - 5 gallon 4 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/_ stalls 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, vngated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2'1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq tt of slope area 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq tt of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq tt of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for ~_/_ the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be keptfree from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within diseased ed dead dama An , , , g y and trimming 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/~_ the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner revew and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~_/_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department 11 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval ~_/_ prior to issuance of bulding permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 12 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ~_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code • Q, R, S, T, U, V Z l to Protect No DRC2003-00637 ComoleLOn Date H. Signs • 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs 2 Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condomtnwm, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall requre separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to Issuance of bulding permits I. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to final occupancy release The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA 3 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Clty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report • 4 The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of Interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards Certification shall be submitted to the Building 8 Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes 5 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant Is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of 495 00 prior to the issuance of bulding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds maybe used bythe Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit J. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multifamily residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Clty Planner review and approval pnor to the Issuance o1 budding permits • Q, R, S, T, U, V 2 ~ _/-~. -~-~- -~-~- -./~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- 5 Protect No DRC2003-00637 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following -/-/- a Site/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Pian, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2003-00637) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report ~-/- Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to -/-/- the Cary pnor to permd issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls -/-1~ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the ~-/- Bwlding and Safety Department 6 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can ~-/- contact the Bulding and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements L. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~-/- marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2003-00637) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application- Contact the Bwiding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or motor addition, the applicant ~-/- shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/-/- matoraddition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to • the Bwlding and Safety Def~~nmant prior to permits issuance Q, R, S, T, U, V Z ~ s Protect No DRC2003-00637 Comolellon Date 4 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding and Safety Official after tracVparcel map -/_J- recordation and prior to issuance of bwlding permits • 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 6 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public -/_J- counter) 7 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department -/~- for approval M. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code (CBC) for property line clearances -/-/- considering use, area, and fire-resistroeness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations -/-/- 3 Rooting material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions ~-J- 4 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental -/-/- Health Services prior to issuance of bwlding permits 5 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC -/~- Section 1505 6 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common wails -/-/- 7 Roofing materials shall be Class "A " -/-/- • 8 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A -/-/- 9 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A ~-/- 10 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the ~-/- construction type shall be V-1 Hour minimum 11 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour -/-/_ fire-resistive construction 12 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC Section 906 ~-/- N. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading es The final grading plan shall be in substantial t -/-/_ ic Standards, and accepted grading prac conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to .-/-/- perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the .-/-/- time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding ld B ~-/- ing u submitted, and approved by the permits • Zl°I Q, R, S, T, U, V 7 Project No DRC2003-00637 Completion Date 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for -/-!- existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Ciwl Engineer • APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, ~~- communitytrails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~~- street centerline)- 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard project site and Sycamore Inn frontage -/-/- / / 30 total feet on Red Hill Country Club Drive - - - 3 Vehicular access nghts shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for ~-/- approved openings Red Hill Country Club Dnve 4 Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by -/-/- deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pnor to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved 5 Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint ' ~-/ s or maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R deeds and shall be recorded pnor to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map 6 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the ~~- final map 7 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be ~~- dedicated to the City 8 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquve the required off-site property interests ~~- necessary to construct the requred public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days pnor to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an lete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and om t t p o c agreemen 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquve the property interests required for the improvements Such agreement shall prowde for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acgwre the off-site property interests regwred in connection wdh the subdiwsion Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Master Plan Storm Drain South of Foothill Boulevard P. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (intenorstreets, drainagefacilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped -/-/- etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards areas , Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees • Q, R, S, T, U, V Z2O Protect No DRC2003-00637 Comolellon Date 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard, protect X X (c) (e) X X (d) (f) site and Sycamore Inn (g) Frontage (h) (i) Red HIII Country Club X X X X X X (g) Drive Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-IleNecessatrdramaf eefacilaitlies provided for this item (e) Street type (f) ADA access ramps (g) ry 9 (h) Depending on school district requirements, provide a bus bay foe westbound Foothill Boulevard east of drive entrance, dedicated additional right-of-way as necessary (i) Modify traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the publlcand/or private street improvements, prlorto final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstructior protect along malororsecondary streets and at intersectionsforfuturetraffic signals anc interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 20( feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Cif! Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Q, R, S, T, U, V Z Z-I 9 / / _/~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- Protect No DRC2003-00637 Completion Date Q. R. f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Slze oty Foothill Boulevard in Prunus X N C N 3 ft 20' O C informal 15 gal Fill in ROW and Median blireianz groupings not more then 25 % of total frontage trees Foothill Boulevard on- Platanus London Plane 8 ft Space per on-site plans- 15 gal site ecerifolia Tree 30' O C suggested Red Hill Country Club Platanus London Plane Bft 30' O C 15 gal Drive ecenfolia Tree Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard Drainage and Flood Control The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer Q, R, S, T, U, V 2 Z Z -~-~- ~~- _J-/- -~-~- -~-~- u -~-~- _J-~- ~-~- -~-~- • 10 Project No DRC2003-00637 Completion Date 2 It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed • from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA pnor to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first 3 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs fvst All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 4 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas 5 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk S. Utilities 1 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 2 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occursroval Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days pnor to final map app in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 3 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 The separate parcels contained within the protect boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits 2 An easement for a toint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first, for Entrance driveway on Foothill Boulevard 3 Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their nght of-way Sar Bernardino Area Governments 4 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for al new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwldinc permit issuance if no map is involved 5 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shat be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable i at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted iron landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Fonn CD-1 shall be submitted tt the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Budding anc Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days foilowinc the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect Q, R, S, T,U,V 2Z 3 _/-/- J-/- _/~_ _/~- ~_/ ~~- -/-/- / / -/-/- ~1~- -/-/ ~~- tt Protect No DRC2003-00637 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. V. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 4 All roof openings giving access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed W. Security Fencing All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police wa the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 X. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire Y. Building Numbering At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department All developments shall submit an 8'/z" x 11"sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED Q R, S, T, U, V 2 2 ~I ~-/_ _/~_ -~-~- _/_J- ~~- _/~- ~-/- _/~_ _/~- ~~- _f~- `J 12 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS July 14, 2004 Charles Joseph & Assoaates Cameo/Sycamore Town Homes N/S foothill Blvd between San Bernardino & Baker DRC2003-00637 & SUBTT16605 MFR complex THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. The public water supply must be tested by CVWD at the point of connection. The test must be conducted prior to the issuance of permits for the Commercial or Condominium buildings in the development. The water supply must meet or exceed the minimum fire flow requirement for the most demanding building. All Structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers "thought-out" in accordance to NFPA 13. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelines for the spacing and location of fue hydrants a The maximum distance between fue hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential protects is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 150-feet. c Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are• i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. u At intersections ui On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv. As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fue District • v. A minmum of forty-feet (40') from any bulding. Q, R, S, T, U, v 2 Z5 If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fue hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwlding, additional private or public fue hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be • provided e. Prowde one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fue flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station morntonng This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fve Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed project may be used to provde the requred fire flow subject to Fire Distnct review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are regwred for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Bwlding permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and the approved RCFPD alternative method regwre that all structures in this development be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance to NFPA 13 "Fully Spnnklered". FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. Per the approved alternative method all sprinkler systems in this development must be monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwlding Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 Q, R, S, T,U,V ZZ~ u 2 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fue lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access - Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the bwlding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radws shall be 24-feet c The minimum outside turn radws shall be 50-feet d The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent • h The maximum grade of the dnwng surface shall not exceed 12% i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) I Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscape access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required budding exterior openings 5 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire Distract approved, compatible traffic pre- emption deuce The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and speafications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use m the event that the traffic pre-emption device fads to operate 3 Q, R, S, T, U, V '2Z 7 d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset 6 Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire Distnct standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: The approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is regwred with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not speafically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Public Assembly, LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures, Liquefied Petroleum Gases FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fue Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when • submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the requved Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Is shared by multiple owners; or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please prodde a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distnct approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in • the submittal 4 Q, R, S, T, U, V Z Z • a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subject to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fue District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement. The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line; or c Provide service to adjacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association; or e Is shared by multiple owners Please provde a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the private water mains, fue hydrants and fire protection equipment essential to the water supply The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The • agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino [_hrnnntc~aical Summarv of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for revew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fue supply system must be designed m accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services wdl inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the • locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radws of the project All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD5 personnel shall inspect the installation and Q, R, S, T, U, V Z Z~j witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fue Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The bwldmg construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, m the • presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subfect to the release of power) 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed m service 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire • Construction Services 6 Q, R, S, T, U, V 2 3 ~ 8 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire • Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all requred fire access roadways 9 Address: Pnor to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street. When bwldmg setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry 10 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industnal and multr family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electncally illuminated dunng penods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial bwldings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes. 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides • contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subiect building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Plan Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwldmg features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • 7 Q,R S, T,U,V23~ RESOLUTION NO 06-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2005-01061 TO REDUCE THE PARKING LOT SETBACK FROM 45 FEET MINIMUM TO 10 FEET TO ALLOW IMPROVEMENTS TO AN EXISTING PARKING LOT FOR THE SYCAMORE INN RESTAURANT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-24 A Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the issuance of Varance DRC2005-01061 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3. All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 2006, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Pacific Rail Road Right-of-Way, with a street frontage of 560 feet and lot depth of 620 feet, and is presently improved with an abandoned water reservoir, and b Properties to the north are developed with condominwms and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commercial uses East of the site is the abandoned Southem Paafic Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use Other properties to the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commercial to the southwest. The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adtacent to the Medium Density residential development . 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. Q, R S, T, U, V Z 3 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-40 DRC2005-01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 a Although the revised parking layout setback is less than the Code allows there will be far more landscape setback area provided than currently exists on the site (no landscaping currently exists at this location) In addition, the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard therefore, the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speafied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code b There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract since the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard c That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprave the applicant of privileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district since the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard d That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district since the deficient setback is a common characteristic of the existing development in this section of Foothill Boulevard e That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity since there will be far • more landscape setback area provided than currently exists on the site In addition, the improvements will result in a complete upgrade of the landscaping and hardscape surfaces for the historic restaurant while protecting the historical resources (building and mature Sycamore trees) 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines thatthe protect identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the Slate CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon thefindingsand conclusions setforth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condtion 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution . O, R, S, T,U,V233 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-40 DRC2005-01061 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Apnl 12, 2006 • Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannmg Commission held on the 12th day of Apnl 2006, by the following vote-to-wit• AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS• u Q, R, S, T, U, V Z'J 1~ RESOLUTION NO 06-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826, PARKING LOT, LOADING AREA MODIFICATIONS AND COVERED PATIO AREA ATTHE HISTORIC SYCAMORE INN RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 8318 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-101-24 A. Recitals 1 Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the approval of Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 12th day of April 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that ail of the facts set forth m the Recitals, • Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on April 12, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to the property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Southern Paafic Rail Road Right-of-Way, with a street frontage of 560 feet and lot depth of 620 feet, and is presently improved with an abandoned water reservoir, and b Properties to the north are developed with condommwms and single-family homes designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), respectively South of Foothill Boulevard is designated Mixed Used and is developed with office and commercial uses East of the site is the abandoned Southern Paafic Rail Road (future Regional Trail and possible future rail) and is designated Open Space To the west is the Sycamore Inn Restaurant and is designated Mixed Use. Other properties to the west are Mixed Use land use and Office/Commeraal to the southwest The Red Hill Golf course is located northwest of the protect site adjacent to the Medum Density residential development 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- . referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and Q, R, S, T, U, V Z 3 cj PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-41 DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Subtect to the approval of DRC2004-00826 and SUBTT 16605 by the Planning Commission and Compliance with all applicable conditions thereof • 2) In accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a tree preservation and replacement program based on the following priorities will be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of grading permits 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot bepreserved-in-place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available 3) The Los Oso Bear Statue (Local Landmark) shall be protected during construction by the use of appropriate fencing, barricades, cones, delineators or other devices approved by the City Planner as part of the regwred grading and bwldmg plans Engineenno Department 1) Install a portion of Master Plan Storm Drain Line III-1 across the protect site consistent with its ultimate extension north and south Provide a 25-foot public storm dram easement for pipes 60-inch in diameter or larger Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan factlities, in accordance with City policy The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public . improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate Q, R, S, T, U, V Z ~j lp PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-41 DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 3 2) Provide private access easements allowing adjacent properties to reach the traffic signal 3) Provide public easement for installation and maintenance of traffic signal egwpment 4) Proposed driveway entrance (street type) on Foothill Boulevard shall align with San Bernardino Road on south side 5) Provide a driveway aisle from Foothill Boulevard to the condo prolect with three lanes one entry lane 14 feet wide continuing to the condo prolect, and provide two outbound lanes, one 14-foot right-tum and one 11-foot through/left-turn lane, and extend from the condo prolect to Foothill Boulevard 6) The northerly entrance to the parking lot on the west side of the Sycamore Inn is to be rotated to the northwest along the condo drive aisle approximately 30 feet to improve line-of-sight to the south. 7) Modify the existing traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road as needed • 8) Foothill Boulevard Parkway improvements, including street trees, th e sidewalk, special design streetlights, and median, shall conform to Foothill Boulevard Districts guidelines outlined in the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. 9) Provde public easement for sidewalks that extend outside the right-of- way to accommodate driveway crossings and ADA access around traffic signal poles 10) Process a Lot Line Adjustment on the northern lot lines so that they correspond with the proposed improvements and, in particular, so that lot lines are at the tops of slopes. Show proposed adjusted lot Imes on submitted drawings 11) Make a contribution in-lieu of construction for the prorated share of the prolect for a future landscaped median on Foothill Boulevard 12) The Grading Plan shall show the following. a) Indicate which storm drains will be constructed with the parking lot and label each one "public" or "private " b) Show BMPs (Best Management Practices) consistent with the WOMP (Water Quality Management Plan). 13) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from one foot behind the sidewalk to the top of curb, along all street frontages Q, R, S, T, U, V 2- 3~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-41 DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 4 14) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the ultimate nghts-of-way 15) The WOMP dated January 3, 2006, has been conceptually reviewed and the following items need to be completed a) Section 1 1 -Provide telephone number for protect owner b) Section 1 2 -Provide permit numbers [List Tractor Parcel Map#, PMT# and WDID#] c) Section 2 1 -Provide source for Mill Creek (Hydrologic Urnt No 801.24) d) Section 21 - "Heavy Metals" is an "Expected" pollutant of concern for this protect e) Section 2 1 -Delete the title "Parking Lot" on the Summary Table since these are the expected/potential pollutants for the restaurant and parking lot. f) Section 2.2 - Provde response to 1.6 g) Section 3 1 1 -There is a discrepancy with percentage of land being landscaped (25 percent versus 50 percent). h) Section 3 2 -Check section numbers for Section 3.2, 3 3, and 34 i) Section 3 2 -Spill Contingency Plan -This protect cannot be considered a residential protect t) Section 3 2 -Common Areas Catch Basin Inspection and Landscape Planning should be marked yes since implementation descriptions are provided k) Section 3 3 - "Organic Compounds" and "Metals" should be a "yes" since they are expectedlpotential pollutants of concern I) Section 3 4 1 -Provide BMP Design Calculations per the revised June 9, 2005, Template m) Section 3 4.2 -Provide BMP Design Calculations per the revsed June 9, 2005, Template n) Section 4 -Complete table o) Section 6 -Notarize and record the Cites "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" (Copies available at Engineering Department front counter) ~J Q, R, S, T, U, V ZJ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 06-41 DRC2004-00826 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 • Page 5 p) Plan Review -Locate proposed BMPs on the Grading Plan 16) Standard Conditions apply Please refer to the attached 6 pages 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2006 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Plannmg Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannmg Commission held on the 12th day of April 2006, by the following vote-to-wit AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • Q, R, S, T, U, V 2 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00826 SUBJECT: SYCAMORE INN DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNADINO ROAD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Dete General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its J~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftemative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 06-41, Standard ~_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not requred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Minor Development Review approval shall expire tf building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and Development Code regulations, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan • 2 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~- submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits Q, R, S, T, U, V 2 ~f ~ Project No DRC2004-00826 ComoleUOn Date D. 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/~_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance • 4 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved ~_/_ by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of bwlding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 5 Trash receptacle(s) are regwred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits a Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City Planner b Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) c Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors d Large enough to accommodate two trash bins e Roli-up doors f Trash bins with counter-weighted lids g Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis h Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view 6 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/~ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _J_/- homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape owner , maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits 8 The protect contains a designated Historical Landmark Any further modifications to the site _/_/_ including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subtect to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval 9 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all ~_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for communrtyconcerns, hours of construction actroity, dust control measures, and security fencing Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/- a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide Q, R, S, T, U, V Z LI Prgect No DRC2004-00826 Completion Date 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) • 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Crty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivrsron- 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborrst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 4 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 5 Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species 6 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code F. Trip Reduction 1- Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in ail commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to free percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the regwred automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number 2 Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area N • covered, the veRical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet ~_/ -/~- _/~- ~-/- ~-/- ~~- ~~ ~-/. ~-/- ~~- ~J_ _/J_ Q, R, S, T, U, V 'Zt-f Z Protect No DRC2004-00826 Comolehon Date G. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Bwlding Code, City Grading _/_/_• Standards, and accepted grading practices The ftnal grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access t Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the Ctty for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from ~~_ street centerline) 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard oroiect site ~-/- 3 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map I. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Cary Standards Interior street tmprovements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Councl Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source ~_/_ of energy, fuel or power to any building service egwpment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is regwred unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all tmprovements regwred by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted bythe Ctty Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all tmprovements regwred by these conditions of approval of development • Q, R, S, T,U,V 2~3 Prgect No DRC2004-00826 ComoleLOn Date • Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard protect X X (c) (e) X X (d) (f) frontage (9) 0) (k) Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Street type (f) ADA access ramps (g) Necessary drainage facilities (i) Modify traffic signal at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road (k) Coordinate with City civil protect slated for 2007 construction • 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street Ilghts, and intersection safety Ilghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified • e Handicapped access ramps shalt be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer t Existing Clry roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Ciry Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per Clty Standards In accordance with the Citys street tree program / ~ -~-~- ~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~~ / / / / _/~_ -~-~- Q, R, S, T, U, V "Z~-I 1 Protect No DRC2004-00826 Comoletwn Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min Grow Space Spacing Size Gty Foothill Rhus lancea African Sumac 5 ft 20' O C 15 Fill Boulevard in informal gal in ROW and groupings not Median more than 25% of total frontage trees Foothill Plantanus London Plane Tree 8ft Space per on- 15 Boulevard on-site acerifolia site plans-30' gal OC suggested Construction Notes for Street T rees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficienaes may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersectons and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required J. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard K. Drainage and Flood Control The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone, therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as requred by the City Engineer Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas _~-~- • -~-~- _/~_ _J-/- -~-~- -~-~- • Q, R, S, T, U, V Z~I Project No DRC2004-00826 Comolellon Date Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk ~. Utilities The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary M. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a toint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first, for Entrance drrvewav on Foothill Boulevard 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bulding permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Prior to the issuance of bulding permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administratwe fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the CRy Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bwlding and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition protect APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~N. Security Lighting • 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 Lighting rn exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED / / ~-/- ~~- ~_~. / / _/-/- ~~- Q, R, S, T, U, V 2~-1 lv "~ w-,~ . Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 15, 2005 Sycamore Inn -Parking Lot Improvements 8318 Foothill Blvd DRC2004-00826 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways u At intersections ni. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As regwred by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwldmg c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bwldmg, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided. d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of regwred fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this protect is 2,000 gallons per minute at a mirnmum residual pressure of • 20-pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III- A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances Q, R, S, T, U, V Z~ 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subiect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow . 3 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for revew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 1. RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Bwldmg Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the budding or swte's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a budding permit must be obtained Plans and speafications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is regwred to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access 'The approved access plans for the Sycamore Inn do not include complete Fire access to the condominium project (SUBTT76605) please submit separate plans. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The mirnmum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent • Q, R, S, T, U, V ZL{ b The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% • i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 1. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Bwlding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b In buildings with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4 Access Walkways• Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates• Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fue District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fue • Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be egwpped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be egwpped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location i For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~ If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation • must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be regwred due to complexity of the various entry configurations. o, R, s, r, u, v Zy ~ 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval • 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan revew FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or budding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required pnor to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property Candles and open flames m public assemblies Compressed Gases Public Assembly Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles m Assembly Bwldings FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form • along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the regwred Fire Department access a Is located on property which is not under the control of the applicant; or b Crosses a property Ime, or c Is shared by multiple owners, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire Distract approval The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino To assist Fire Construction Services m reviewing the agreement the following shall be included m the submittal • Q, R, S, T, U, V ZS~ CJ a The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement b The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subfect to the agreement c A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 2 Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement The plans as submitted indicate that a regwred private fire mains or appurtenances a Pass through or are located on property not under the control of the applicant, or b Crosses a property line, or c Provide service to adfacent properties, or d Is located on common space under the control of an owner's association, or e Is shared by multiple owners u Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the prvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or bwlding permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any budding permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distract Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Pnvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Bwlding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delroenng any combustible framing matenals to the site Fve construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distract and CCWD Q, R, S, T, U, V 2`7 On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any • combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' °Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire . hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, °Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers°. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hinng the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the regwred fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service 4 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fve Construction Services 5 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 6 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access • roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services Q, R, S, T,U,VZ~Z The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and • contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the regwred annual inspections and the maintenance of all regwred fire access roadways 7 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buldings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or bwlt with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all swtes 8 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distnct use in the event of an emergency at the subiect bwlding or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 9. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and bwlding features as regwred in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Q, R, S, T, U, V Z`J.3 f • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE April 12, 2006 TO' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner SUBJECT REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES/AIM ALL STORAGE - A review of the construction and operation of an existing Aim All public storage facility on 6 13 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the east 210 Freeway on-ramp The purpose of this review is to ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent with conditions of approval or in a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially intunous to properties in the vianity pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 17 04 035 G.2 - APN 1076- 331-02 and 1076-341-01 Related file Variance DRC2004-00050 • ABSTRACT. The purpose of tonight's meeting is to review the progress made by Aim All Storage in addressing their neighbor's concerns On January 25, 2006, the Planning Commission agreed to hold an ~~ evidentiary hearing to consider whether there ~s sufficent evidence to warrant a full examination" of the Conditional Use Permit for Aim All Storage, however, postponed the hearing for at least 60 days ANALYSIS Since the January 25th Planning Commission meeting, Aim All Storage has been working with the neighbors Staff presented five unresolved issues Freeway Noise -The building permit was issued for the sound wall on January 30, 2006 The wall is approximately one-third complete Aim All Storage believes that they will complete the wall by April 12, assuming there are no significant ram delays The residents wanted a sound wall to connect from the existing freeway sound wall to the new Aim All Storage Building B Code Enforcement measurements of noise levels during the weeks of January 9 and 16, 2006 indicated that noise did exceed City's interior standards 2 Security -Residents were previously concerned that the perimeter wall and gap(s) in said wall are not sufficient to keep someone from entering into the Aim All Storage project and then gaining access to their rear yards The gaps were filled prior to January 25, 2006 On December 24, 2005 a burglar broke into Aim All Storage via the front gate on Haven Avenue 3 Lighting Glare -Aim All Storage removed every other light bulb and painted the lenses black to direct lighting downward Residents had requested that lights be turned off or shielded, • however, residents are now requesting that these lights be put on motion sensors so that they ITEM W PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-00850 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES April 12, 2006 Page 2 " stay off until needed The lights are directly visible from their second floor windows Code Enforcement measured lighting levels on January 18 and 19 and determined that lighting did not exceed the City's 5 footcandle maximum The highest level measured 4.6 footcandles directly under the parking lot light near Haven Avenue The lighting level along the east-west drive aisles between storage units, which is what affects neighbors, measured only 7 footcandles 4 Sunlight glare on white rooftops of 1-story storage buildings -Aim All paid $1,500 each for all affected residents to have their windows professionally tinted Residents had requested that roofs be painted a darker color The rooftops are directly visible from their second floor wmdows While glare is clear from visual inspection, Code Enforcement's measurements of lighting levels on January 19 were inconclusive because there is no practical way to determine how much was dust from normal sunlight versus reflected sunlight 5 Noise of rainfall on metal rooftops -Following an intense storm in October 2005, residents complained of noise emanating from rain falling onto metal roofs Building G abuts their backyards Residents requested that a different roof material be used. The plans presented to the Planning Commission, and approved, indicate that roof material was to be "UltraDek" or equal with a "Galvalume" finish UltraDek is a standing seam metal roofing product Although staff has visited the site on numerous occasions, none were during rainstorms During heavy rainfall, because there will be noticeable noise as ram falls on a variety of surfaces, such as pavement and roofs, including the roofs of homes in the neighborhood, pools, and concrete patio and pool deck surfaces, there is no practical way to measure ram noise from metal roofs of storage buildings The Building Offiaal researched potential finishes or materials that may be applied to metal roofs of storage buildings Generally, there are two choices 1) insulation, such as sprayed-on polyurethane expanding foam, or 2) weatherproofing, such as sprayed-on rubberized coatings None of the manufacturers or installers contacted had any data on the noise reduction characteristics of these products CORRESPONDENCE Public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the Aim All Storage site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the hearing the consider testimony, and determine through minute action whether the issues have been adequately addressed or, if not, determine that suffiaent evidence exists to warrant a full investigation by staff and noticing a public hoarinn to-rewew the Co io al Use Permit and consider possible modification or revocation Acting City Planner DC/Is Attachments Exhibit A - Letter from Aim All Storage • • • 2 AIM ALL STORAGE CENTER • 6599 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 909-481-5550 March 16, 2006 Gordon and Eileen Crowl 6550 Valmda Avenue Alta Loma, California 91737 RE: Aim All Storage Center, 6599 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. and Mrs. Crowl• Over the past several weeks, we have been in the process of trying to address and resolve the issues and concerns of the neighbors of Aim Ail Storage Center We have eliminated half of the lights and painted out the lenses on the remainder of the lights so that the I~ghts wdl illuminate in a downward direction. This will resolve the lighting issue. On the NorthEast end of the property we have started the construction of a new sound wall and • it will be completed in a couple of weeks This will eliminate two concerns, access to the back of the property from the freeway and greatly reduce freeway noise We have been in contact with the Crowl's about all of the above mentioned issues in addition to the glare from the buildings They have supplied us with an estimate to have window treatments done on the windows that face the property We feel that it is only fair to offer each two-story homeowner the same offer. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of fifteen hundred dollars to address the issue of he glare from the roof We would appreaate if this indeed does address your concerns and issues, that you would contact Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at 909-477-2750 and let him know. Sincerely, Mike Giurbmo -Manager Aim Ail Storage ZSO, LLC VII 3 AIM ALL STORAGE CENTER 6599 Haven Avenue • Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 909-481-5550 March 16, 2006 Mr Harry Hearn 6560 Valinda Avenue Alta Loma, California 91737 RE Aim All Storage Center, 6599 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr Hearn Over the past several weeks, we have been in the process of trying to address and resolve the issues and concerns of the neighbors of Aim All Storage Center. We have eliminated half of the lights and painted out the lenses on the remainder of the lights so that the lights will illuminate in a downward direction. This will resolve the lighting issue On the NorthEast end of the property. we have started the construction of a new sound wall and it will be completed in a couple of weeks. This will eliminate two concerns, access to the back of the property from the freeway and greatly reduce freeway noise • We have been in contact with the Crowl's about all of the above mentioned issues in addition to the glare from the buildings They have supplied us with an estimate to have window treatments done on the windows that face the property We feel that it is only fair to offer each two-story homeowner the same offer Enclosed please fnd a check in the amount of fifteen hundred dollars to address the issue of he glare from the roof. VJe would appreaate if this indeed does address your concerns and issues, that you would contact Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at 909-477-2750 and let him know. Sincerely, Mike Gwrbmo -Manager Aim All Storage 210, LLC u W AIM ALL STORAGE CENTER • 6599 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 909-481-5550 March 16, 2006 Mr. and Mrs Jiles 6580 Valinda Avenue Alta Loma, California 91737 RE. Aim All Storage Center, 6599 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. and Mrs Jiles: Over the past several weeks, we have been in the process of trying to address and resolve the issues and concerns of the neighbors of Aim All Storage Center We have eliminated half of the lights and painted out the lenses on the remainder of the lights so that the lights will illuminate m a downward direction. This will resolve the lighting issue. On the North East end of the property we have started the construction of a new sound wall and • it will be completed in a couple of weeks This will eliminate two concerns, access to the back of the property from the freeway and greatly reduce freeway noise. We have been in contact with the Crowl's about all of the above mentioned issues in addition to the glare from the buildings They have supplied us with an estimate to have window treatments done on the windows that face the property We feel that it is only fair to offer each two-story homeowner the same offer. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of fifteen hundred dollars to address the issue of he glare from the roof We would appreoate if this indeed does address your concerns and issues, that you would contact Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at 909-477-2750 and let him know Sincerely, Mike Giurbino -Manager Aim All Storage 210, LLC • w J AIM ALL STORAGE CENTER 6599 Haven Avenue • Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 909-481-5550 March 16, 2006 Mr and Mrs Wayne Moore 6600 Valinda Avenue Alta Loma, California 91737 RE. Aim All Storage Center, 6599 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr and Mrs Moore: Over the past several weeks, we have been in the process of trying to address and resolve the issues and concerns of the neighbors of Aim All Storage Center. We have eliminated half of the lights and painted out the lenses on the remainder of the lights so that the lights will illuminate in a downward direction. This will resolve the lighting issue. On the NorthEast end of the property. we have started the construction of a new sound wall and it will be completed in a couple of weeks This will eliminate two concerns, access to the back of • the property from the freeway and greatly reduce freeway noise We have been in contact with the Crowl's about all of the above mentioned issues in addition to the glare from the buildings They have supplied us with an estimate to have window treatments done on the windows that face the property We feel that it is only fair to offer each two-story homeowner the same offer Enclosed please find a check in the amount of fifteen hundred dollars to address the issue of he glare from the roof. We would appreaate if this indeed does address your concerns and issues, that you would contact Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at 909-477-2750 and let him know. Sincerely, Mike Giurbino -Manager Aim All Storage 210, LLC AIM ALL STORAGE CENTER . 6599 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 909-481-5550 March 16, 2006 William and Trina Stone 6610 Valinda Avenue Alta Loma, California 91737 RE• Aim All Storage Center, 6599 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr and Mrs. Stone Over the past several weeks, we have been in the process of trying to address and resolve the issues and concerns of the neighbors of Aim Ali Storage Center. We have eliminated half of the lights and painted out the lenses on the remainder of the lights so that the lights will illuminate in a downward direction This will resolve the lighting issue. On the North East end of the property we have started the construction of a new sound wall and • it will be completed in a couple of weeks This will eliminate two concerns, access to the back of the property from the freeway and greatly reduce freeway noise. We have been in contact with the Crowi's about all of the above mentioned issues in addition to the glare from the buildings They have supplied us with an estimate to have window treatments done on the windows that face the property. We feel that it is only fair to offer each two-story homeowner the same offer Enclosed please find a check m the amount of fifteen hundred dollars to address the issue of he glare from the roof We would appreaate if this indeed does address your concerns and issues, that you would contact Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner for the City of Rancho Cucamonga at 909-477-2750 and let him know Sincerely, Mike Giurbino -Manager Aim All Storage 210, LLC r1 LJ W i, C~ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA CuRc~o GA APRIL 12, 2006 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Maaas Fletcher _ McPhail _ Munoz _ II. NEW BUSINESS A PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW - DRC2006-00207 -MARK SATER - A request for a gas station of 2,900 square feet with 8 fueling dispensers and 2 diesel pumps for light trucks, an 1,800 square foot fast food faality with drive thru, and 375 square feet of patio area, in the General Industrial District, (Subarea 8), located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route APN 0229-141-11 III. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the hme and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda IV. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/ournment hme If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission I, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 6, 2006, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamong a ~~'' Vicinity Map Planning Commission Workshops April 12, 2006 N ~ Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ Sphere1.shp • /\/ City Boundary (as of 12/20/2005) PC ITEM: A DRC2005-00287 LOUIS HSIAO Tony C and Tina H T TRS 206 Goldenrod Drive Walnut, CA 91789-2051 Dr Molabe 9555 Foothill Boulevard A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 PC ITEM B DRC2005-00810 MIKE D Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 St Peter and St Paul Church 9135 Banyan Street Alta Loma, CA 91737 PC ITEM: C-F DRC2005-01000/ DRC2005-01002/ D R C2005-01006/ D R C2005-01003 DONALD Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Ontaro 303 East B Street Ontario, CA 91764-4105 PC ITEM G&H PC ITEM L-P DRC2005-00256/ DRC2004-01197/DRC2005-00001/ SU BTPM 17077/ SU BTT17435/SU BTPM 17460/ DRC2005-0071 DOUG LARRY Peninsula Retail Partners Brett Del Valle 301 Shipyard Way Newport Beach, CA 92663 I-15 Rancho Pacrfic, LLC 8300 Utica Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3879 San Bernardino County Flood Control District 825 East 3rd Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-1000 Pitassi Architects Inc 8439 White Oak, Swte 105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 PC ITEM I SUBTT17938 DOUG Bob Gall~shaw 3419 Via Lido, Swte 483 Newport Beach, 92663 Silver Oak Development 8175 East Kaiser Boulevard Anaheim , CA 92808-2214 PC ITEM J&K DRC2005-00585/SU BTPM17423 DOUG Associated Engineers Inc 3311 East Shelby Ontario, CA 91764 HPA Inc Hoon Keun Park 4931 Birch Street Newport, CA 92660 PC ITEM O-V DRC2004-00339/DRC2004-00352/ SU6TT16605/DRC2003-00637/ DRC2005-01061/DRC2004-00826 LARRY Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Cameo Homes 1105 Quail Street Newport Beach, CA 92660-2705 PC ITEM W DRC2003-00850 DAN State of California P O Box 231 San Bernardino, CA 92402-0231 Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard Swte 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 PLANNING COMMISSION: 4-12-06 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: 4-12-06 CITY PLANNER: 4-11-06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 27, 2006 Mike Diaz 11AR 3 0 2006 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department RECEIVED -PLANNING 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr Diaz, at StntlPetee and St elPau~ Chu ch elswouldr notr o~pposee the~l prolept if a couple of problems are resolved. My biggest concern is the matter of parking, Presently there is not enough parking for the church. On Sundays and other special occasions the parking lot is full and the over flow spills over on both sides of Banyan east and west and across Beryl Avenue, on Beryl and up Falling Tree Lane The intersection of Falling Tree Lane and Banyan is very dangerous dunng these times, and a serous accident can occur at any time. It is almost impossible to turn on to Banyan during these occasions. Also, the small number of extra parking slots planned is insufficient to rectify this current problem much less increased traffic. Secondly, all of the new roo s indicate that a estoa lott moore actvities. anticipated. Certainly the (ll~lr~~1f of rooms sugg numb~erdo carsdroppu$i~g offeh ildre, n and pickl g tthemhup would add 90 the ~cj~Q problem. can not make the meetingg ~~1jh the Pl~nnin~ Comlpj~sion because of a long standing business com-i~ii+jpi~rl~. ~~h~r w~sg I wou c~ ~R~~ar. Th~a~~k~s for your consideratiorj; CFrdrles ~ra~rne,~'~`~'-- 6019 Falling Tre~L~e Alta Loma, CPE'~' 909 944-5438 ~' x-><e~ 3 From the desk of Anonymous Homeowner Regency Way Alta Loma, CA 91737 04/03/06 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ref Aonlication of St Peter and St Paul Church (9135 Banvan) to build new office bmldmsr This letter is in response to the notice of heanng for the pernut to allow construction of a new pastoral center at 9135 Banyan As a local resident, I wish to voice an opposition to this new construction I do not believe any construction should be allowed until the out of control pazlnng situation is dealt with The church should not be allowed any more building until more pazkmg is added Every weekend and often dunng the week we have to deal with cazs parked m front of our house I have also been told that they intend to remove the existing office building once the new building is built How can we be assured this will really happens I find it difficult to behave they will do this when they are trying to achieve more office / meeting space Please review the pazkmg situation and insist that they deal with that before any more buildings aze added I would suggest you visit the area on a Sunday mommg and look at the situation Sincerely, Anonymous Homeowner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APR 0 5 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING .~~~ !J r .! N•5 F,) ~, ~~~ i~ ~, t, 1~ ~- n c( "a ,~ ~ 'f^1 P~ ~~ ° '~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~.~ - ~ c M r ~ ~ 3 ,} ~ Q. 3~~ o ~ F o oa ~ 2 a- ~ t' V~ ~ v ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~v~ ~ 0 J ~ V ~ ~~ ~ ~ Z 0 ~~~~ H I` ,a it I'~ C~ '+ m 04/12/2006 01'14 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 01/06 Charles Joseph Associates Office 909-481.1822 688.240.1822 Pas 909.481.•1824 Cxcg Ceamx • 10681 PoorbrA Blvd , Swtc 395 • Faiocbo Cucamonga, CA • 91730 4~ r. ' ~ ``,~~ per; Apnl 12, 2006 Pages: 6 (Indudng thrs Fax Cover SAeet1J To: Pnncipal Planner and Commissroners Fr~p- Chuck Buquet/sb Compan Crty of Rancho Cugmlmga Fax :-uo.: 909-477-2847 sutHect: Response letter to the attached nei hbor letter to Council CC: All Planning Commissioners and Larry Henderson To the commissioners and Mr. Henderson. Attached is a response fetter to Mr. Stoy's letter sent to the Council, as well as his onginal letter Respectfully, Charlie CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APR 12 2006 RECEIVED -PLANNING Please cell (909) 481-i822 Hyou did no! raC9lVe a/!pages a8 indicated above. Thank Youl 04/12/2006 01.14 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 02/06 Charles Joseph Associates PUBLICIPRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Apnl 11, 2006 Mr Hank Stoy 8509 Calle Carabe Rancho Cucamonga, 91730 Re' Cameo Homes Sycamore Villas Parcel Map 16605 Dear Mr Stoy, This letter is in follow up to the positive dialog and discussions this week over the phone concerning points of concerns which were raised in your Apnl 4~', 2006 letter, which were 1 Development on 30% slope area of "High pensity" 2 Run off flows being property captured 3 Structural integrity of Red Hill Condos; examples of other areas 4 Foothill Congestion & Accidents First, I would like to provide some clantications Tho proposed development is not a "high density" (which would be 2430 units per acre) as the project is only 9.98 dwelling units per acre, which would fall under the City ,Zoning designation of "Medium Residential". It is my understanding from City zoning records that the existing Red hill condo project is 13.50 +/- net acres with a total of 75 unds; which equates to 5.5 units per acre There are slope areas that are 30% on our site Our Civil Engineer indicated that a majority of these slopes are man made and created by unknown persons to deal with the uncontrolled drainage overflow from the Red Hill Condos. After the proposed grading Is completed, the site will be a building industry standard for slope construction that wouki meet the City, local, state and international grading and building codes and be much less of a slope than the current condition That being said, our proposed amendments to the code will be consistent with the spent and intent of the Development Code for prowdmg controlled residential development on the hillside Also, it is important to note, that 30% Hillside development standards for residential standards do not apply to ~mmercial development. Hence, this site could be developed entirety as commercial wilhout the proposed General plan and Development cede amendment since those standards do not apply to chat use. There is also precedent for development on this slope from 1991 for an office product wdh a 3 story profile for our GienYs property We have these old plans available in our office and at the City for review at your leisure. Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Pa 909.481.1824 Cary Center .10681 Poodvll Blvd , $Wie 395 • Aaucho Cneamonga, CA • 91730 A CALIFORNIA CORPORA'1TON 04/12/2006 01:14 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 03/06 Second, in your letter you mentioned that in your revew of the plans, atlequate capture of the drainage was not provided by our development. Unfortunately, you are incorrect in this regard. All drainage will be accepted according to local, regronal and state standards. This was something presented at all three neighborhood meetings, iwo of which you attended- We are more than willing to go over this plan in detail with you further with City Engineenrtg staff or provide you with a copy of the drainage report for your review and evaluation Third, it is our understanding that the structural integnty of the existing row of Red Hill condos, one of which you reside, were designed prior to the current Building code standards of development From what we can gather, the existing Red Ffill condos do not have a proper storm drain system to properly control water drainage and the existing drainage sheet flows across the streets and into the condos foundation. Current building codes require that ell drainage drain away from structures, however the current Red Hill condo drainage does the contrary by draining to the building structures. This likety has contntxated to the years of erosion you have expenenoed as well as exacerbated the existing slopes making them more than 30% which will continue to occur until proper drainage infrastructure is in place to accept and channel this uncontrolled drainage runoff. Our geotechnical engineer has confirmed that the Sycamore Villas protect will not destabilize the whole hillside as you suggest As a part of the expensive geotechnicai investigation of this property, slope stability analyses were performed on the proposed slopes These analyses were performed under both saturated and seismic conditions The resuks indicate that the slopes will have safety factors against failure in excess of those required p e, 1.5 for saturated conditions and 1 1 for seismic conditions) As for places like Laguna Beach and Laurel Canyon, homes in those arses where landslides have ocxurred were, far the most part, constructed prior to development of current hillside building codes. Today's building codes require geologic and geotechnical investigation, particularly in hillside areas to prevent this from happening again. Lastly, we wanted to address the traffic issues mentioned in your letter We are aware of the current traffic conditions for vehiGes pulling out into cross traffic which has a potential to create acadents on Foothill as well as the concern about residential egress congestion Our project will help with this in three ways. First, our project will be conditioned to relocate the traffic signal for the proper flow into and out of the project site consistent with City Traffic Engmeenng studies. Second, we will be required to provide additional land to be dedicated to the Cdy for widening the existing Foothill Blvd road in front of our Project for the City's street widering protect The City vnll be reconstructing the old rail overpass crossing and widernng the road for safer travel along Foothill Blvd 04/12/2006 01 14 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 04/06 Thud, we will be required to construct a landscape median along the Foothill in front of our project. The construcLon of this median will prevent vehicles from pulling out in front of cross traffic which can cause accidents In other words, the cars pulling out from the existing businesses on the south side of Foothill (Knockers, Automotive, sell storage, office, Ynce's, etc) Hell no longer be able to cross traffic and head west, nor vnll westbound vehicles be able to turn left on Foothill into these businesses. They will be required to utilize the traffic tum signal to make a "U-turn" to get to these businesses or udltze the San Bernardino road connection conversely These controlled intersection turn movements combined with the 'right in, nght ouC movements from the businesses onto Foothill will tre much more controlled and safer than pulling out into cross traffic and should help to significantly decrease the traffic accident concerns you mentioned m your letter- Lastly, the anticipated Foothill Blvd improvements and traffic studies which provided for the mixed use designation of development for either residential or commercial for the subject property anticipated traffic movements abng Foothill and the proposed protect will not exceed those thresholds respectively. We thank you again for the opportunity you provided us to discuss these matters m detail over the phone last week and believe the proposed improvements planned over the last 3 years with Crty Traffic, Planning, Fire and Engineenng staff address the concerns that you have raised We remain available to discuss any other details regarding the project at your leisure. Please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions regardmg this matter and Thank you for the opportunity to provide response and dialog from your letters mailed to the City Sincerety, ~~7. Charlie Buquet Charles Joseph Associates Cc, Larry Henderson, Acting Principal Planner Cc; Planning Commissioners Cc, Mayor 8 City Council Cc, Cameo Homes 04/12/2006 01 14 9094611624 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 05/06 &S~9 CRl.L~ GARRBE RA~lGH4 etxAMoI.~A,CA R1T34 C404} q,il- oi9ss RPRIL. Ht zoo6 ~6P p6fjhliJiiJG ~IUISION Gi7Y aF RAIJCFFO CUCAt140A3~.R Rts; PRopa~Ep SYCFIM[-RE Urr.t-A:s' GE1JTl,ti= M EIJ ' 0 ~,~y of ~'NG~~c~cP~ ~~~.Q~~ fl.S R Hb~dIEOW~1frf2 VYIicSSL PROPER~'Y A8Ui3 TFfE PR6fpS~D O~UEIroPM~IJ"I'- I HHUE SEV~RRL MH.IOR ColvC~iQrJs f960UT Tf~iS PROJECT WFtIcN RRe= F1fGH~.IGNTEA /A] THE ~ot.t,oW IWG PaRRGRAPhIS, G~u~ gt~ ~t.~ai AMEtJAMFiJT ORC zooy~ 00339 pt~u~roP~l~u"r cow Arn~+~~/rn~ur~RC zDOy-no3s2_ Had,/ CAIJ `fkE C+TY 41= RAIUCt~(7 CUCHMoIUQA ~U~t~3 ~6RIOU<SI.V Cai.-sip~R R1.L~ow-t~G. ft HIG-N-gEiU5lry L~o6 vNl7s ~N zl A~~'~t.MUt-TIP~E-SitaRY DEU~1.aAMEiU~r o~u r~A-UD YNICN Cou~rAius R ~a P~Rcr;+VT st.ap~ ? WE NRUE NRO ~~U~IPAt. ir~9'r'ANcES OF S--0PF5 ir-UING WHY 1fJ OUR ouv~2 >EUEt~oPME0.1'r (~AJAC~IJ`7' To TI-tE s(]BJ~CT PROPt-IQ-rY, "HIS PRc~.tfaC.T Mt}3 '7'Nf* PQTt'NrtAL ~R p&-S`T'ABf!~ixilJG'- rH>w WHAf,t~ FtI~i,SrpE. 1 HM NOT Ar RtL CoMFOR7E'0 BY THE i~URAAJC,.ES Wr= HAUE RECEIUI~A TNR7 THt$ LR~~ :AtJ 8E DEUELOPrA SAFELY, I Na! GERTRIA) THE}T P~'OPt-E' PI P~f~c~s 1.1KE 4.fi(>:UNA Fli~l S AuA l.flURfKL. 4A~1Y4N WNi`R~ IIL.l.SID~ AtSRSTEI~S MAUI 4aCVRREU i~t~c~tUEA TNE3~ IRME Yf:SSURAf~C~S WHF~ pRoJLC7~ W1=RE BUILT c51.) LoP~s wHrCH sttou~.p NR~E N~-tt=R r31=t~u o~uEC,d1~t±A, AL50/ RuIJ~~ FROM -fHE "-~P of '1"HE HILL Ft,01ACS MRDt>C;Ff THIS PROPERTY IN S6l1ERAf- Pl./~cES' BfJO TMER~ R~ aRr`RT f~CCUMUl.ATioJJs dF WAr~R ~r TH>;' Ao-rmal of HE SLOPt~ AFi ~R Eu~leY s-['aRM. 't't1E AI~AAi5 I NRV~ 3EEIl? o NOT sEEnq To ffQE4 uArEly RAAREss ~PRAIIUAG~ SsuES. 04/12/2006 01.14 9094811824 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC PAGE 06/06 MIT+G/JrsD `Nl=cartU~.R~.rcpt~Ttox7 ~F ,~~~~~t1Tl~L ! cis HpW CItIJ -t•N~ n1~c~-ArtUE tMPfic.Y o~ S>~f1!*1QI~L h{D~JAR~D RApITlotJAl~ V~HIcL.I~.s PoRINc~ oN7~ Fa[srHt~t, l3ovr.l;uR~D Ct?eN p(~Y Posslac.V e~ rnl'CIGR7R'D ? THE FOaTWILL CoRRIAOR, IS RL.R~AAY H~Rulr-.Y CoNGFSi ED, IRhJp 'r"hE PaRrrotil ~W~~I~ ~! iN~yAt~ D R tJ P GROUE is ou ~ OF ; ~E wbk~ST ~5`r'RETC,t{~', iNF RoApw&Y utUAER 'r'N~ RHI~RoAl9 ov~R~ss ,~s ~BRa,E,r_y N LRIJ~S 1/dIOE,~~Vt7-I•~ nfo .SMAUL-D~'f?5) /~tsp THE UNCQN'T740t,~aD INT>=RSECr+otJ A-t' EoorHlt_t_ R>Jlj REA I•ilL,l_ cot,lJrR~f CLUB aRlv~~sc~u~ of ~~ (~CCIp6~UTS) Is l~K~"RE/y~!-~/ !^(q~#J-~potJS, i"Hrs r,>vU~c.oAM~'a~T wII.L o~;~.Y Ml3KE Mr3Tr~Rs waRs>=. iT ~'HC~Ul.p RRso $!~ IJOT~IJ T HRT NRRROWr WIAI pl+VG RED I~ILL C0UU'1"R~( CL.U6 ARN~ WILL. I~LSQ .8>; NFl~U1L~/ 1MPACTr;R, TitE SP>=cI~1C pRoBt-~i~t.S t r(r}UE M~'rJrr0~7~f? HSdvEJ COUP--~D WITN THE R+R RNA Nols~~ Pot.1.~~rr0~J cR~A~T~p $Y TN-s N1GH- P~eaSt~ ~pEUEi.oPM6WT~ WILL GRr`l~Tl.~j DEGR9DE' 7N~ q~uAI,ITY AF LtfiE FAR -r-rtos~ o~ t1S b.rUl~G 1N THE' SURR0UNAI(~1G HREA. I ORG~E THE Pl.AA}AlI1JG Coryn~t.sstatil "7v .p~N THE REQUESTED GEtJ~RAl. Pl.A1J RuD OEUEl.QPMEIJ~" COAIa HMI"IJ0Y4tEWTS~ RS WE'LL. AS THE NEGA'1'IUI~ ~~r-.Rf~AITbDJS~ N~e~sseRY `r0 At.i-OW THIS (~RQf~~~ alrU~L,oPM+~'!JT T'Q MQd~" FoRWBRA, ThtArJK yoU t=oR YOUR T1M~ r~up ~~T~'rJTtoN , s rNc~R~E.Y ~ ~~~ f-ft=URy L, ~/NAIJ~(~~ STDy CG' MRYOR $Iti.L. RL.E7(ANPER MAyoR PRO TAM 01A1JE Wtd.LIRMS Co~uetLrrot~MSER Rt_x (~uTII;RRE~ C.ouuCtlal'N6M8GR OEtiuIS M 1CNN~t, CoUNG>,M5M6~'R SAM SAAa1J0~.a P \~ ~~ ~\{ e (,~ ~ !2, f ~ lA~ IO i i~ i i ~ i i i !~ i i i i ~ ~ m 3 n 0 S 0 B v 0 b T 14 ~5 z 0 f7 c n m 0 0 d 0 d O C M--~ r r ~.~w1 V I "_~SI ='~ .-~ Y `~ ~ N ~e° I r~It l2 ~,i'41~fi 4?I+ `. ~~~ Y* r I r ~4ll iap }~{. e.5 '4 , Y~ i ` `• , Y E: b .t, zf„ ~~z ~ti 'r ~~~Yt` ~~ ~~, " r p'F °,-ii « A 4 ~- L * r '. A =w~ S ~i * q ~ ' S: ,{ n +' a• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA SYCAMORE VILLAS Project Description Location: NEC of San Bernardino & Foothill Blvd. The project is located on Foothill Blvd between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue Cameo homes is proposing a residential subdivision of 7 lots for town homes purposed on 21 acres of land The design of the 206 town homes are Craftsmen style town homes, with lush landscape and meandering walking paths throughout The entrance to the Sycamore Villas well be to the North of the Sycamore Inn creating a lush an Intimate entrance that will be shared by the Sycamore Inn and the Villas The project well branch off In a naturalistic style of the area to the grand entry to the Clubhouse The Sycamore Inn site will be improved with landscaping, parking lot lights and a new parking lot Type of Land Use surrounding Protect: North of the site is the Red HIII Condo Community & County club East is a future site of community trail East of the trail crossing is a vacant property zoned Multi Family South of the site is Foothill Blvd ,with restaurants on the south side of Blvd West of the site is vacant property and the Sycamore Inn Site Size: 21 2 Gross AC Density: 10 DU/AC Open Space: 53% Common Open Space: 59% 490,806 SF Private Open Space: 5% 43,842 SF Usable Open Space: 58% 534,648 SF Building Summary: 206 Units 8 "A" Buildings 5 units/bldg 12 "B" Buildings 7 units/bldg 3 "C" Buildings 6 units/bldg 3 "D" Buildings 8 units/bldg 4 "E" Buildings 10 units/bldg ~- UNIT SUMMARY Plan 1 2br/2ba flat @ 1~` floor Building A 1104 SF 16 units Plan 1 2br/2ba Flat @2nd floor Building A 1104 SF 16 units Plan 1 2br/2ba Flat @1 st floor Building B 1179 SF 24 units Plan 1 2br/2ba Flat @2nd floor Building B 1104 SF 24 units Plan 1 2br/2ba Flal @3rd floor Building B 1104 SF 24 units Plan 2 2br + Den 2ba Flat @2ntl floor Building B 1143 SF 20 units Plan 3 2br/2ba Townhouse Buildings C, D, E 1256 SF 82 units Total number of uni ts 206 Parking Requirements Required 423 Spaces (206 Covered) Provided 423 Spaces (214 Covered) (82 Covered tandems in addition) RECREATIONAL BUILDING Consisting of 2,968 S F Teaching Chef Kitchen High Tech stainless steel built- in appliances Beautiful stone counter tops Business Center Rooms Billards Area State of the Art Exercise Room PROJECT AMENITIES Pool and Spa within Recreation Area Overhead Shade Trellis Area with Seating located in Recreation Area Recreation Center with Teaching Kitchen, Billiard Area & State of the Art Exercise Area Business Center within Recreational building Recreational Trails throughout site with benches with access to the Rails for Trails Public System Walking Bike Path located at the Easterly end of the property Three (3) Built-in Gas Barbecues located at the West end of site, also in the pool area, and at the East end of the site Shade Structure Gazebo located on West end of site at the Park Two (2) large Parks with Natural Vegetation on West end of site that totals over 1'/: acres One (1) Vlew Point Vista with Seating and Gazebo on East end of site One tot lot centrally located centrally In the protect Gated Community with Modem Access to unit Impressive Lush Landscape with over 900 trees planted Accent Paving with historic scenic entry to Protect UNIT AMENITIES Views from several units Voluminous 10 foot ceilings Solid core entry door with stylish lever handle Operable Windows Prewlred for Instant connectivity -fiber optic, high speed computer broadband, in-house networking, telephone, and TV reception Durable concrete flooring Classic hardwood flooring Hookup for vent-less combination washer/dryer Central-air conditioning Energy efficient water source heat pumps for heating & cooling with programmable thermostats COOL KITCHENS Sleek European-style cabinetry with maple overlay doors, concealed hinges and metal slide drawer guides Distinctive stone countertops Under cabinet lighting Convenient eating bar Dual stainless steel sinks with garbage disposal and pullout faucet Automatic ice maker pre-plumbed for refrigerator High-tech General Electric® stainless steel built-in appliances 30" self-cleaning electric oven 36" Profile 6-burner gas cooktop with pilot-less start 36" hood with Profile spacemaker microwave oven Energy effiaent and sound insulated Triton EX automatic dishwasher WELL-APPOINTED BATHS Sleek European-style cabinetry with maple overlay doors, concealed hinges and metal slide drawer guides Impressive stone vanity countertops with square edge detailing Seamless glass mirror Elegant bathtub with complementing ceramic file surrounds per plan Ceramic tiled walk-in shower with clear glass enclosure per plan Ceramic Tile Floors Auxiliary infrared heater pampers body and soul ~ Il• ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Project Team ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Developer. Cameo Homes 1105 Quail Street Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact Victor Mahony Kim Berry Tel 949-955-3832 Fax 949-250-8574 Kim(a)Gcompanies coin Architect/Planner: KTGY Group, Inc 17992 Mitchell South Irvine, CA 92614 Contact Manny Gonzalez, AIA Principal Kai Lau, Designer Tel 949-851-2133 Fax 949-851-5156 klauCc~ktgy coin Landscape Architect: David Evans and Associates 800 North Haven Avenue, Suite 300 Ontario, CA 91764 Contact Chris Giannini, L A Tel 909-481-2133 Fax 909-481-5757 cco(a~deainc coin Civil Engineer: Hall 8 Foreman 420 Exchange, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602-1301 Contact Mark Reader, P E Tel 714-665-4500 Fax 714-665-4501 MReader(a~hfinc coin Consultant: Charles Joseph Associates Consultants 10681 Foothill Blvd ,Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Chuck Buquet Tel 909-481-1822 Fax 909-481-1824 chuck(a.chasioseph coin 0 w v~ rn N :, I E XT E R I_Q R_ M IRT f; R I,A LS I vwLU coLDRCrowreD nucco 1 IODI' \LXNOHD CONC\e!e TLCO _ 1 RAILINOi IY] x 1;~ VINYL LICCL7) ~ PAiIOC LAIR-ANICL AND tO1tNCLV e{ PAIXTHO MTN ACCINT COIAR ~ OARMB OOp{6 R'ODD OIAIN TH;TV ILD OYeINLAO RCLL LLCI'IOXAL pOORI PAIMTCD VITM wttexr COLOR e aaDP ewve u Re;wvn gooD PAOCU PAIxreD evrrx wccvxr coLOa a vwLL rrwc;none 1 DLCOIATIYH Tl1Y CiVLCO MRM ACCINT COL06 OVER PoAY RHPLR TO DLT.UL On OX86IA] l ]N ViTHRi VINYL PAINT;O MrtX ACCHNT CO LOC f CNIYNLT HLLYLNT B;THg10R PLACTLR 10. TRHLLI0. VINYL YLYLHRE MIM'eD MRN ACCHXT COLD{ IL OeCORATVH CICCHIt AND OVTLOOCeRi 0.PJArIN MOOp IAINTBD VRN AfLHNT COLOR Il PoSI` RPIAMN MOOD PAINTHD MITX ACCBNT COLOR NORTH ELEVATION D i Ic IJ -Z~~- f_I a \ REC BLDG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CwMPD HOMPS SYCAMORE VILLAS um owl OD.X SU BTTI6605 ieL M»o"+x+°+u: "Y0 DRC# 2003-00637 vAZ IYn HO UI. Rancho Cucamonga. California ~~ Lror Nn wean KTGV GROUP .. sxem AD uL]wl Il WEST ELEVATION 1 EXTERIOR MATERIALS I WALLB CO LORSOATED SNCCO ' °^'M tLCNOEp CONCRCPC TILC9 LIXDS I%3 0~ IXa VINYL PKCETC o PATIOy NIL] AND POI3NELV CB CAINTCp MITM ACCENT .ML DOOt9 WOpp GRAIN TC%TURCD IBAp b'I'EtL 3LCTIONAL DOORS PAINTCp WITH T COLOR T pAVL L[ RISAMN WOOp PACCIA CAINTCD \CCCMT COLOR .L STACCSI'ONC ORAIIVC TBItl STVCCO WITN ACCLM COLOR !OAtl RCPCR TO ptiA1L ON SNCCT A E RERS VINYL MINTCD WITN ACCENT COLOR 4NCY CLCNCNT E%TERIOR PLASTCR SLLIS VINYL MENtCRB PAINTED WITN ACCENT OMTIVC CICCCRS AND OUTLOOKCRA RPAAWN PAINTED MITN ACCCM COLOR T RESAWN MOOD PAINTED WITN ACCEM SOUTH ELEVATION z e REC BLDG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CAMEO HONES SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTT16605 IIM Quul N,ed ""PN' °ic" 41 9°60 DRC# 2003 00637 eu IMSSp noun Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornta CTOY Np 30M(ME KTGY GROIW ~... sneer A N lE)SIVf 7 L~ EAST ELEVATION i C~ ~ a u ,. - 3 '~ a r~ E 131h-St ~ ~ ~ RANCHO' ~ , ~ ~ CUCAMONGA~ A it S n ~ Red HIII ~ n a t k, Country Club ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ D ~ E ~ th a ~ a a ~ --- ILBhai CYJit1 (arahn [r =Red Hdl ~~ .~~ ,~*c~ $an Bernardino Rd ~"`~ o ( y Upland ~ ~~~ ~~- ~ ~'~ ptadda cz Avenida Vefar E Arrow Hwy Arrow Roule 4 ~' ~i .~ a ~ E $dllnd $t $dlind $t ~ ~ ~ ~'j ~ ~- E 9th 3t 9th St _ ~ Q Bowen St - E ~ ~ Bowen $t Chaffee St a } ~ Chaffee St ~ ~~-~, ~ a Mdn SY - ` , ~ 1 u e p¢~'Ir~a~ Dr 420031dwwzoacory, ®200~Nawecn ana/orcot,wc E eth $t VICINITY MAP r~~aa.an• ~ MapPoint' ~~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ o o h ~ J Estacia Sf 5ti Deum J Konocti St Calle Velar T ~ Q J ~ ~ ~- - ~~ ~ ~, r ~ _. 0 A. ~ NN9TRUCf10N LEGEND ~N \ _ _ __ / / ~ ~ PIANf-ALET15_ _ ._ Y=---- • / /t1~ ~S ~ ® G ~~ G 9 _."_ i ~ ~ _ 1 L1_v~E WSUmw • ~ A _ _ ~• i~ W~ ® ~ ® ~ .~. 1 _ ~~ ~/ PPD1ECf AMFNf11F.5 0 ~~ _ _ d • _` ._._ CONCEPTOAL LANDSCAPE. PLAN SYCAMORE VILLAS _ ~ CITY OF RANNO NCAMONGA ~ v m ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ PLANT PALETTE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QTY SIZE ~,;,, DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE "` Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 118 24"BOX, 36" BOX ~ { . } DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREE ~,r" Cercis canadensis'Forest Pansy' Eastern Redbud 56 24"BOX, 36" BOX DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE Aescuius cornea Red Horsechestnut 98 15 GAL, 24" BOX O EVERGREEN ACCENT PATIO TREE (fawn home site only) Raphiolepis'Maleshc Beauty' Rhaphiolepis Indica 41 24" BOX DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 217 15 GAL, 36"BOX DECIDUOUS UPRIGHT TREE (town home site only) Alnus rhombifolia White Alder 190 15 GAL ~~'1~ 2 ~ ' ' EVERGREEN SHADE TREE (town home site only) ~•L~ Quercus agnfolia Coast Live Oak 111 15 GAL, 24" BOX O+ DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE (town home site only Quercus englemenu Mesa Oak 53 15 GAL, 24" BOX EVERGREEN SHADE TREE (town home site only) Prunus ihcifoha Hollyleaf Cherry 54 15 GAL, 24"BOX DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE Platanus acerifolia'Bloodgood' London Plane Tree 63 24" BOX, 36" BOX DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREE Lagersiroemia mdica Crape Myrtle 11 24"BOX, 36" BOX O EXISTING HERITAGE TREES TO REMAIN - PROTECT IN PLACE NO HERITAGE TREES WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SYCAMORE INN PROPERTY O HERITAGE TREES TO BE REMOVED & REPLACE W/ 2 48"BOX TREES PER HERITAGE TREE ® Shrub and Ground Cover Planting Areas 5 Gal, 1 Gal, & Rooted Cuttings California Native Hydroseed Mix (town home site only) Hydroseed mix & 5 Gal Sodded Turf Sod Note Trash enclosure & utility areas to be screened appropriately Tree sizes shall be as follows per City of Rancho Cucamonga's Development Code 80% 15 gallon 10% 24" Box 10% 36" Box or greater Trees Required 915 Trees Proposed 925 Approximate Total Landscaping 56% r r +~e~ ~s r1 r ~ r Ar r ~ r, ~ ! ~ CONSTRUCTION LEGEND ® PRIMARY MONUMENT SIGNAGE ® PATIO COVER/ TRELLIS ACCENT PAVING ^ PLANTER POT ® COLORED CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN WALK INTERSECTION ® TUBULAR STEEL PEDESTRIAN GATE TUBULAR STEEL FENCING POOL AND RECREATION AREA ® SPA ® BUILT IN GAS BARBECUE ® CLUBHOUSE BUILDING W/ RESTROOMS ® TRAIL SYSTEM TURF AREA ® ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ® VINE COVERED SPLIT FACE BLOCK RETAINING WALL RECREATIONAL TRAIL CONCRETE WALKWAY 0 GUEST CALL BOX SYCAMORE INN PROPOSED REDESIGN OF SYCAMORE INN PARKING AREA VEHICULAR GATE-RESIDENTS 8 GUESTS PLANTER AREA PARKING AREA ® BENCH SEATING ® SEATWALL ® BLOCK PILASTER AT TUBULAR STEEL FENCE ^ BIKE RACK ® VEHICULAR GATE-RESIDENTS ONLY TRASH ENCLOSURE 12"WIDE CONCRETE PAVING ADJACENT TO ALL PARKING STALLS SYCAMORE INN DELIVERY AREA RETAINING WALL W/STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH BUILDINGS PICNIC/SHADE SHELTER w/BARBECUE ACCESS TO RAILWAY TRAIL SYSTEM ACCESS RAMP PLAY STRUCTURE SWING SET RUBBER PLAY SURFACE RETAINING WALLS PER SEPARATE PLANS PREPARED BY PARSONS BRINKERHOFF OUAITE & DOUGLAS EXISTING SYCAMORE INN SIGN TO REMAIN KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL SYSTEM W/PLANTABLE CELLS MAILBOX KIOSK SECONDARY MONUMENT SIGN LOS OSOS BEAR STATUE TO REMAIN i~ 1 1 1 t ~~ r CAMEO HOMES 1105 Quctl Sleal N~'potl &¢S CA 93660 TEL ~W91955JU3 FAX IN9135065A ~. KTGT NO E00](M3 BLDG "A" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SYCAMORE VILLAS suB-rrl6ws DRC# 2003-00637 Rancho Cucamonga, CahforJna KTGV GROUP ._ SHEET A 3 11130W o~ U ~ SOUTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) WEST ELEVATION i 1 1 t ~1 1 CAMEO aOM ES 1105 Qunl Strtel Nevpotl BncM1 CA 93660 TEL (9c91955)U3 PAX Iw9135085)~ ,_ Xrcv No zaolwz BLDG "B" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTTI6605 DRC# 2003 00637 Rancho Cucamonga, CalSforma KTGY GROUP ~._ SNEET A 5 N zzow _~ SOUTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) ~~ i 1 1 1 ~ ~ NORTH ELEVATION (SAME GARAGE ELEVATION ON BLDG "A") BLDG "B" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CAMEO HOMES SYCAMORE VILLAS "'°"'°°°' ~~ II05 Qunl 54at x=rwn eaon a 90660 DRC# 2003 00637 ~~ _ __....w TEL (919 9s51U3 rex ~w9)350891 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma CTGY NO 300)013 sxex-r n6 vzoos J WEST ELEVATION i r SOUTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) O • 16 ^ -vi- u BLDG "C" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CAMFA HOMES SYCAMORE VILLAS sus7T)e6os 1105 Qu11 SIR{I ""'°" °er`~" 'i`°0 DRC# 2003 00637 eu ni»a'a'Owni Rancho Cucamonga, Cehforma KTGY GRQF .. f11[LE M tt)IOOi NORTH ELEVATION r° ~~ ~ {.~ ,~, _ ' rLo , I ~~~ ~ ~' CAMEO aOMFS II05 Ouvl Sven ' NewOOn Buch CA 93f60 TEL 1989195538II FA% (W9I JSO BSH 1_ I[TOY NO TDD)~eZ ~h ~, .~Y SOUTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) BLDG "D" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (BLDGS "C" & "E" SIMILAR) SUBTT16605 ~~ KTGV GROUP .~ SYCAMORE VILLAS ~,,: ~ ~~ DRC# 2003 00637 ..~~._~ Rancho Cucamonga, CaLforn3a SHE6i A II 313Y45 ~I I L 1 1 1 r' WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) BLDG "D" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (BLDGS "C" & "E" SIMILAR) CAMEO HOMES SUBTTI6605 ~~ KTGV GROUP ~.. Ne pQeneBa:~~~CA n060 SYCAMORE VILLAS „_• , rep iw9l 9ss 3u3 DRC# 2003-00637 ... ..._.._~ Fex iw9~ao esn Rancho Cucamonga, Cal3forma sxeer w is ^ ~ ~_ KTOT NO 30939E SI300f [~ NORTH ELEVATION i+~n .'~ SOUTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM FOOTHILL) o • ie L' -Y~- x e BLDG "E" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS im w.n w.~ `"""°"°"~ SYCAMORE VILLAS x,~pw, 4r4 CA 1]660 uz wn mm: Rancho Cucamonga, Califorme [NT MO %O]M] .. _ ~. SUBTTIG605 DRC# 2003 00637 sxeer A u ~, i H i x I!~`(~y {{~. 1 s ]'za ]~~'K Y~ Y A "2 KTaY GROUP K l]3ItW ~' ~OUiICOKEM STNCFSTdiF ARCHITECTURAL ARTICULATIONS cn[teo noeees Krov c,~zouP „E,~>,~., SYCAMORE VILLAS _ - Ne~yen9hTO4CA 93NW DRC# 2003.00637 P,el[` wn i~+eui. Rancho Cucamonga, Cal9forma [TOT NQ 3001W1 YIWI GP110 VCREr FENCE - CECIiiATNE 91UTiEi ARCHITECTURAL ARTICULATIONS PoT SHELL CAMEO HOPES SYCAMORE VILLAS suBrri~aos KTGY GRIXIP 1105 QuY YrtG r"c Mn`5`n'i "~0 DRC# 2003.00637 ._ •• _~..Y ruz an z5wn~ Rancho Cucamonga, Celiforma ~ cmr Ha mo5o5x aamo. i i t 1 1 1 1 c~veeo xorNa um c..o av.a Narym~ M~4 G fal0 iBL a~rlfS]al PNC aNa aouN PLAN 1 . 2 BR / 2HA PLAN 1 - 2 HR / 2BA 1104 S F (o IST FLOOR) 1104 S F (0 2ND FLOOR) PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 248 SF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE I50 SF woomoN.u ~a a+ o.uwon ae u waomoNU. rtoa m owawoa me v o ~ ~a a UNIT PLANS SYCAMORE VILLAS SUBTTI6605 DRC# 2003.00637 Rancho Cucamonga, California KT6Y Q3IXPi ~.. ~NO81 MY {IILCI J PLAN 2 - 2 BR / 2BA 1143 S F PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 245 SF FroAwos •n cF CANEO HOMES II~S t)ull 6vc Negart le,l CA 1]Ib lEL M11 Hf Ml] FA%. M11114 ~fl1 nVY Na IMMi] 1ST FLOOR PLAN 3 - 2 BR / 2HA TOWN 1256 S F PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 235 S F novae vs cF 0 ~ 16 ^ --~T~ ^ 1 ~ UNIT PLANS SYCAMORE VILLAS Rancho Cucamonga, California SUBTT16605 DRC# 2003-00637 3RD FLOOR KTOY GROIRi ~~• 1N8R AJ{ il1]DY 2ND FLOOR Lnw OJfice of Edward A. Hopson 655A North Mountain Avenue Upland, Cahfonua 91786 [elephone (909) 920-6464 jacs~n~ile (909) 920-3727 Apn112,2006 By US. Marl & E-Mail (clucck(n~,chasjoseph.cout) Chuck Buquet Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 205 Rancho Cucamonga, Cahforma 91730 Re Sycamore Vi[laspr•oject Dear Mr Buquet As you know, I represent the pnncipals and owners ofBear Gulch, Inc Bear Gulch (formerlyknown as Sycamore Inn, Inc) is the owner of the real property and the restaurant building which for years has housed the Sycamore Inn Restaurant The restaurant building and property is currently leased to Chuck Keagle of Cask `N' Cleaver fame, through one of tins affiliated corporations ` We have worked for several years with the developer of the Sycamore Villas protect, Cameo Hoines In October, 2004, we negotiated and Bear Gulch, Inc granted an ingress/egress easement m favor of Cameo Homes/Rancho Cucamonga Development 212 L P to permit the Sycamore Villas condomimum development to gam access across the Sycamore Inn property from the traffic signal Ultimately, the area covered by that recorded easement proved not to be workable . With the assistance of Pete Pitassi, the land owner and the restaurant operator worked with Cameo Homes to amve at an alternative location for the ingress/egress easement which is shown m the proposals up for consideration tonight While the final details of the relocated easement are not completely finalized, the revised location ofthe access to the Sycamore Villas protect from Foothill Boulevard which was Iomtly developed is reflected on the matters which are up for consideration before the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission this evening, as Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment DRC 2004-00352, Enviromnental Assessment and Tentative Tract SubTT16605, aztd Environmental Assessment and Development Review bRC 2003-00637 In connection with construction of ingress and egress across the Sycamore Inn property, Cameo Homes has agreed to construct, at its expense, a number of improvements which we believe will sigmficantly upgrade and enhance the operation of the Sycamore Inn Some of these aze the subl ect Bear Gu1chV..etter to Chuck Buquet wpd ~j ~~, s ; ~,, ~ Chuck Buquet April 12, 2006 Page -2- of addtttonal ttems on the Raucho Cucamonga Platmmg Comnusston agenda tomght, conststmg of Variance DRC 2005-01061 and Mmor Development Revtew DRC 2004-00826 Val Crean, the Prestdent of Bear Gulch, Inc ,whose family operated the Sycamore but for nearly four decades, and I appeazed at the Destgn Revtew Comtmttee hearing on thts protect to mdtcate our support for approval of the various Cameo Homes' applications and submtttals m connection wtth both the Sycamore Inn property and their Sycamore Villas protect Unfortunately, neither Mrs Crean nor I can attend the Platmmg Cotnmtsston hearing tomght I would tike you to provide a copy of this letter to the Platmmg Cotmmsstoners to assure them that the proposals which they are revtewmg tomght which relate to the Sycamore hm property have the full support and endorsement of the property owner (Bear Gulch, Inc) as well as the tenant of the Sycamore but (Cucamonga Restaurants) and that we urge Plamm~g Commission approval Very truly your / J Edward A Hopson EAH rv cc Client Bear Gulch~Letter to Chuck Buquet wpd Page 1 of 2 Coleman, Dan From Spirit4everl@aol com Sent Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10 57 AM To Coleman, Dan Subject Aim-All Storage Dear Mr Coleman, I'd like to apologize for sending this a-mail so late, but I will not be able to attend tonight's Planning Commission meeting due to illness On or about March 16, 2006, Mike Tormey came to our door and handed me an envelope He said that it would explain "everything that's going on back there "Inside the envelope was a letter and a check for $1500 00 The letter explained that checks had been issued to all two story houses on the block that are adjacent to the storage facility far window tinting based on the estimate that Eileen Crowl had received for her windows Since our windows are more than 25 years old (not brand new like the Crowl's), they will have to be replaced before they can be tinted So we really do appreciate the gesture and will try to put the money towards replacing our windows The letter, also, stated that a wall was being constructed at the northeast side of the property not only to close that area off, but to help reduce noise I honestly have not seen that wall, but have been told that it is indeed being built However, the last time I went by that area (Friday, April 7, 2006) there was still a chain link fence up against the block wall To me, that still makes access to the storage facility, and ultimately our properties, fairly easy I would like to see some kind of resolution to that issue The letter informed us that the lights at night had been dimmed (I had actually noticed that before we got the letter) and the domes over the lights had been painted Once again, I appreciate that effort, but my bedroom window is right where the emergency vehicle lane enters the faality so the light still floods out from that area I really don't know what else they can do about that other than the motion-sensor lights Nowhere in that letter did it address the issues that I have with the wall they put up in my backyard At the last Commission meeting, Mr Guirbino stated that he talked to my husband about the wall and that he was "happy "Actually, my husband was satisfied that the safety issue (the gap between that horrible sloping wall & our neighbor's wall) had been addressed My issue is Not with the color of the block nor the way it was engineered, but, instead with the slop way in which it was constructed Like I've said before, the color of the grout is far, far darker and the grout lines are bigger and more uneven than our existing wall Also, there is grout splattered on the wall We still have water seeping (not pouring through as before) through the wall where the sloping retaining wall meets the concrete where their rain gutter is located This, in my opinion, is happenning because they were allowed to build 3 feet above our property level And since they built that retaining wall right behind our existing wall, we have a major leeching problem even with the new portion of the wall The view from my bedroom window is that of a step-down wall, a severely sloping retaining wall, and another not-so-severely sloping wall in the distance It used to be of the hills (& sunsets) west of us When we cut down the trees in our backyard, we'll have another lovely view of that severely sloping wall that runs along the back of our neighbor to the south's wall I'm sure that no one assoaated with this project would be "happy" to have this their own backyard~~~ Please believe me, I am not complaining lust to complain I honestly feel that these issues adversely affect our property value in a way that we can't correct (the bushes & trees can be removed, but the storage faality is there to stay apparently) I lust feel that it is completely unfair that the interest of a business owner (especially a business that is a "cash cow" for the owner, but generates relatively low revenue for the aty in which it is built) should supercede the interests of property owners that have been there (& paying taxes) far longer However, I do not feel that this is all Mr Gwrbino's fault In fact, I feel that Charles Joseph Associates, The City Council, The Planning Commission, and the Planning Department (especally Brad Buller since he thought this was such a great idea) are all to blame and should be held equally responsible for what has happened to our neighborhood in general and our property specifically Do I feel that Mr Guirbino's business permit should be revoked Believe it or not, I would hate to see anyone lose their business, even Mr Gwrbino I feel that it would be unfair to punish him since it was the City that approved everything and it does seem that he is finally addressing some of the concerns of the neighborhood I would, however, like to see my issues addressed (with respect and not disdain) and not lust blown off the way they have been Sincerely, ~ / 1~~7 (//,f`~/ 4/ 12/2006 / Trina Stone PS Did you see that 10 grenades & a cache of weapons were found in a storage facility in the L A area yesterday Page 2 of 2 4/12/2006 Planning Commission Meeting of ~/L-~0 6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM 1 C ~u~~ ~1o~2d! ~;z'rfwc*~3Pcf~ ~ 2 ,,..gg ~/ ~ ~- 4 Jv l Ufi `~(//G~W ~- 5 _ ~'ll~~rt, t~'V~'~!~`~VIfGIG -lq~~I b~(VI~ ~cf~~i1~/~` ~lrl `~-? ~ar~. ~'µrl°s"~ ~ dbo J~A`-~ fw~ (/ Git P1~ G~ Gi46~ 6 ~ 7 ~, f~~//l~f ~/q'~ I.~Q~`k~t ~uiu ~ ~ 4, n,,~T~,C/' [~ ~(?Q~.~r~~~F 3; l.~ ~- YZ~ Fzx,c~~!/a[v~,fi~ ~Z roo ~~,r,vr ~1 ~S-.4r{~c ~zA.er2 12 ~3r~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~l, 14 ~~~K •~77V 15 J„1~~ulr~ C~' ~r~a Ftr~~ 16 i~~.`y ~-nrsl s ~ [ 17 ~ /d- i 9- )~ 18 ~ C G' ~,~ 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 i-(20 ~kC11~~~/~(C~SZ Si~[oo 8soq Ct~~.~l~ CRRe$~ ~~ ~, w l~~18 3 C~ I~ t ~iyre,~ 6 t k4p3 ~tl~ ~,~2.~12 sS-5~~~ C.~I~B~ ~~F63 ~wL ~~~,~a~- /~c ~ac~ ,m,;~ ~l (~ Rr ! q 17.0 ~~ [~ ~ ~ ~)~?~ 2C 9~~ 3u ~~9i73 D ~~ 9~~~ v -~~-T~~ ~ ~ 9~~3-~ c~- v ~v ~-v _~V ~-v ~~v